The URL can be used to link to this page

City Council Agenda Packet 06-26-2017AGENDA CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, June 26, 2017 — 5 p.m. Academy Room AGENDA 1. 5 p.m. — 2016 Audit Review 2. 5:45 p.m. — Review Street Projects CIP and Financing City Council Agenda: 06/26/17 2. Review Street Proiects CIP and Financing Below is an outline of the topics to discuss at the workshop. Enclosed is a map of the proposed street improvements and estimated costs. 1. Project Descriptions- street, sidewalk and trail considerations 2. Construction timing 3. Financing considerations • Recommended maximum bonding of $5,000,000 per year • Property Tax Revenue • Reserves 4. Other Items to consider • Fallon Ave sewer extension study and service area determination. • Complete traffic volume analysis after Fallon Overpass constructed and development (Mills Fleet Farm, etc). • Signal warrant analysis at School Blvd/Cedar Street and Chelsea Road/Cedar Street. • Flashing yellow arrow retrofits on TH 25 signals- priority and timing • 95th St Extension- finalize feasibility study and decision • Future workshop on trail and sidewalk gap connections and prioritization 2018-2022 CIP 6/26/17 Proposed Estimated Construction Project PROJECT Year Cost Fallon Ave Overpass 2018 $8,400,000 7th Street- Cedar to Washington 7th Street mill and overlay $300,000 7th Street trail 2 "overlay $95,000 7th Street sidewalk- south side $135,000 Total 7th Street- Cedar to Washingtron 2018 $530,000 Cedar St, south of 7th St- keep rural 2018 $120,000 Chelsea Road 2019 Chelsea Road Reconstruction- Edmonson to Fallon $1,000,000 Chelsea Road mill and overlay - 25-Edmonson $175,000 Chelsea Road Trail -north side $125,000 Chelsea Road Sidewalk- south side $140,000 Chelsea Road FM extension- TBD $435,000 Total Chelsea Road $1,875,000 Fallon Avenue 2020-20XX Fallon Ave Reconstruction - Chelsea to School $1,500,000 Fallon Ave Trail - Chelsea to School $140,000 Fallon Ave trunk sewer extension- Chelsea to School TBD $2,500,000 Total Fallon $4,140,000 Balbou Street Recon (Area 6 ) 2020 $1,500,000 Briar Oaks, Oakridge Street Recon (Area 7B) 2021 $1,500,000 Cardinal Hills - mill and overlay or reclaim and pave 2022 $2,500,000 FINANCING PLAN BONDING YEAR BONDING AMOUNT MAX $5M Fallon Avenue Overpass 2017 $3,000,000 2017 Street and Utility Improvements 2017 $2,000,000 Total 2017 $5,000,000 Fallon Avenue Overpass 2018 $5,000,000 7th Street and Cedar Street 2018 Total 2018 $5,000,000 Fire Station 2019 $3,000,000 Chelsea Road Reconstruction 2019 $2,000,000 Total 2019 $5,000,000 Fallon Ave Reconstruction 2020-20XX $2,000,000 Fallon Aven Trunk Sewer Extension- TBD 2020-20XX $2,500,000 Tota 1 $4,500,000 Balboul Recon (Area 6) 2020 $1,500,000 Briarwood, Oakridge Recon (Area 7B) 2021 $1,500,000 Cardinal Hills mill and overlay or reclaim and pave 2022 $2,500,000 Property Tax Revenue and/or Reserves $650,000 Monticello Geographic Information System P O sTN 5"1 N� I ---� �—1 I REST CT \ ? PRI411 R❑ y11LL n P \�. O �V LIEFERT OR CRF �i jF N STNE m \ COUNTY ROAD 39 NE \\\ GWE VIEW DR -` GOLF COUP Y1 \� "FAIR I cr = O I z I -0 1,250 2,500 Feet POTENTIAL STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS 2018-2022 OSTW VP 3 �� OLL-9f- pRl�q !DR TI . -S PARk z R a WFSz h 0 T S I CT,y Du nR iao� F -I DEEGAN u�/ �EnPce° Ha wARo° :;TG� 2020 2 24? FA.RMST>-."M x(+•10 - z ? 0� �i u �4 44. II P ° / w __—_ �. EaaLEBROOK DK p � •. "" A P0.I rnN P G] HARV m.cr _ —_-- �% < NF_ O RIVER 7/f� vv Oq NE -. CTNE.. b��P port-t�Rff LNG AVE NE TO E8' 194 \ � F9 \\ _ STH ST NE 94TH I.l Ar — SAD a O BRIAR OAK,,o Sn %49 E S ISI 0IE`I'1 LN p \ \ yoRW EAST OAK DR\\ F _ \ w _ Q sIS'GN CIR EE's" K. Z m'lll� w U 8�e ST DEER y �G O Z NE O/R (n O w x BA nr,E R15L 2&4DGERC-R_ ¢ w I x 4 84THS"! L. St NE. � I 0� I _-�2NLLSS11E 1 inch = 2,092.828706 feet so ary of Monticell o G1 CITY OF 1MVIoLntikelfflo 1 9 m o m COUNTYRnAD39NE = 2018 = 2019 2020 = 2021 2022 \ P5TH ST NE z �E J— a N w�E Ewument Path J4gis4clty4MONllMaps4Basemapmxd s June 26, 2017— AGENDA REGULAR MEETING — MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, June 26, 2017 — 6:30 p.m. Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETINGIWORKSHOP Academy Room 5 p.m. 2016 Audit Review 5:45 p.m. Review Street Projects CIP and Financing Mayor: Brian Stumpf Council Members: Jim Davidson, Bill Fair, Charlotte Gabler, Lloyd Hilgart 1. General Business A. Call to Order & Pledge of Allegiance B. Approval of Meeting Minutes • Special Meeting Minutes from June 12, 2017 • Regular Meeting Minutes from June 12, 2017 C. Consideration of Adding Items to Agenda D. Citizen Comments E. Public Service Announcements/Updates • Construction Update F. Council Liaison Updates • Library Board • EDA • MOAA G. Department Updates • City Administrator Update • Congressional Update — Stacy Morse, 61 District Director 2. Consent Agenda A. Consideration of approving payment of bills B. Consideration of approving new hires and departures for City departments C. Consideration of approving the sale/disposal of surplus city property D. Consideration of shifting to paperless agendas beginning the first City Council meeting in July 2017 E. Consideration of approving an application for a temporary on -sale liquor license for the Monticello Lions Club for their Brewfest event on August 19, 2017 F. Consideration of approving a Special Event Permit allowing exclusive use of West Bridge Park and related assistance in conjunction with the Brewfest event on August 19, 2017. Applicant: Monticello Lions Club G. Consideration of approving a Special Event Permit for outdoor entertainment at Chatter's Bar & Grill on July 14 and 15, 2017. Applicant: Steffens, Brooke/Chatters Restaurant H. Consideration of approving annual liquor license renewals for 2017-2018 I. Consideration of approving the Finance Manager to attend 2017 Accela Finance and Administration National Training in Portland, OR on 7/19/17 through 7/20/17 at an estimated cost of $1,750 J. Consideration of approving the Community Center Director to attend the 2017 National Recreation and Parks Association Conference in New Orleans, LA on 9/25/17 through 9/28/17 at an estimated cost of $1,537 K. Consideration of approving a request for Development Stage Planned Unit Development and Preliminary Plat for Spaeth Industrial Park for a multi -lot industrial development in an I-2 (Heavy Industrial) District. Applicant: Spaeth, Ken L. Consideration of approving Summary Ordinance No. 671A for amendment to the Monticello Zoning Ordinance Chapter 4, Section 3 — Fences and Walls; Chapter 4, Section 5 for regulations for multi -tenant building signage, Chapter 5, Section 3 for regulations on Accessory Use Dwellings, and Chapter 5, Section 4 for regulations for Temporary Uses — Food Trucks M. Consideration of calling for a public hearing on `date' by the Monticello Planning Commission on the amendment to the Monticello Comprehensive Plan for adoption of the Downtown Small Area Plan N. Consideration of approving installation of new electrical service at Well House #2 by Olson & Sons Electric (OSE) for $12,259 and Xcel Energy for $12,912.85 (total of $25,171.85) O. Consideration of approving an outside cleaning service to clean city buildings at a cost of $53,100 annually P. Consideration of approving the replacement of Community Center aquatic play structure by Recreation by Lemmie Jones at a cost of $99,765 Q. Consideration of approving the plaster resurfacing of the pool vessel at the Community Center by Northern Pool Restoration at a cost of $79,653.29 R. Consideration of approving payment of sick time balances, estimated at $81,760, into the MN State Healthcare Savings Plan for Union employees transitioning to the City's PTO plan 2A. Consideration of items removed from the consent agenda for discussion 3. Public Hearings A. PUBLIC HEARING - Consideration of adopting Resolution 2017-29 approving property tax abatement related to infrastructure improvement in the City of Monticello 4. Regular Agenda A. Consideration of accepting the 2016 Audit Report B. Consideration of a request for Comprehensive Plan Amendment for `Places to Shop' to `Places to Work' and a request for Rezoning from a B-4 (Regional Business) District to a I-1 (Light Industrial) District. Applicant: Jim Bowers and John Chadwick C. Consideration of approving a request for Amendment to Planned Unit Development, Development Stage Planned Unit Development, and Preliminary Plat for Chelsea Corner for Office, Service, and Warehouse Uses in the Red Rooster Planned Unit Development. Applicant: Red Rooster Properties, Inc. D. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2017-27 accepting grant and committing to local matching funds, estimated at $110,000, for the 2017 MnDOT Stand -Alone Noise Barrier Program 5. Added Items 6. Adjournment MINUTES SPECIAL MEETING — MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, June 12, 2017 — 5 p.m. Academy Room City Hall - Monticello Community Center Present: Brian Stumpf, Jim Davidson, Bill Fair, Charlotte Gabler, Lloyd Hilgart Absent: None Others: City staff. Jeff O'Neill, Wayne Oberg, Angela Schumann, Shibani Bisson, Rachel Leonard, Tom Moores, Sarah Rathlisberger, Mat Stang, Tracy Ergen, Jim Thares, and Matt Theisen Others: Chuck Keyes, Veolia Water North America Project Manager, and Margaret Becker, Veolia Water North America VP of Operations 1. Call to Order Mayor Brian Stumpf called the special meeting to order at 5 p.m. 2. WWTP Operation Management Alternative — Management Contract vs. City Staff Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator, introduced the item and gave a presentation. The presentation included: history of WWTP operations and operations comparison of private contract versus city staff. Mr. O'Neill stated that the decision of private contract versus city staff does not have to be made at the present time, however, a letter needs to be sent stating non -renewal 120 prior to expiration or the contract automatically renews. Some of the considerations discussed during the workshop were: facilities maintenance; staffing; technical support; and capital improvements. Chuck Keyes, Veolia Manager, addressed the City Council and provided information on the operations of the facility and what Veolia provides in service. He added that Monticello has a complicated system. Mat Stang, Public Works, responded that the system is complex, however, city staff would be able to operate at current level. Wayne Oberg, Finance Director, gave a brief history of expenditures. Mr. Oberg commented that implementing a change in operations to city staff would save approximately $121,000 annually. The notice of non -renewal is on the regular meeting agenda. 3. Adjournment By consensus the meeting was adjourned at 5:55 p.m. Recorder: Jennifer Schreiber Approved: Attest: City Administrator City Council Special Meeting Minutes—June 12, 2017 REGULAR MEETING — MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, June 12, 2017 — 6:30 p.m. Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center Present: Brian Stumpf, Jim Davidson, Bill Fair, Charlotte Gabler, and Lloyd Hilgart Absent: None. 1. General Business A. Call to Order & Pledge of Allegiance Mayor Stumpf called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. All City Councilmembers were present. B. Approval of Meeting Minutes Special Meeting Minutes from Mav 22, 2017 Councilmember Gabler moved approval of the special meeting minutes of May 22, 2017. Councilmember Hilgart seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Regular Meeting Minutes from Mav 22, 2017 Councilmember Fair moved approval of the regular meeting minutes from May 22, 2017. Councilmember Davidson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. C. Consideration of Adding Items to the Agenda • None. D. Citizen Comments • Chuck Keyes, WWTP Manager - Veolia, noted that Veolia has achieved the Outstanding Compliance, Maintenance and Management Award from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency for each year managing and operating Monticello's Wastewater Treatment Facility. E. Public Service Announcements Mayor Stumpf thanked various entities for their help with the storm aftermath — Wright County Sheriff's Department, Fire Department, City Staff — Public Works and Administration/Communications. Rachel Leonard, Communications Coordinator, provided additional information on storm cleanup. City Council Minutes —June 12, 2017 Page 1 1 9 • Rachel Leonard, Communications Coordinator, provided an update on the following: - Summer Kick Off at Bertram Chain of Lakes will be June 17, 2017. - Movie in the Park will be June 24, 2017 at Pioneer Park. • Shibani Bisson, WSB/City Engineer, provided a construction update on the following: - TH 25/7th Street Intersection - most of the concrete work is completed and the permanent signal will be up within a couple weeks. The total project will be completed by the end of June, weather permitting. 2016 Street Reconstruction project — the streets between TH 25 and Washington Street and between Broadway and 7th Street will receive final pavement beginning June 19. It will take four days to complete. 2017 Street Reconstruction project — reconstruction in the area of Gillard Avenue and Mississippi Drive will begin June 26 and notification has been sent to residents, including those in Sunset Ponds. Gillard Avenue will be open to traffic. Haug, 90th St., and 95th St. project area will begin the middle of July. Hart Blvd. and Sandberg Rd. area is scheduled for August. The total project is expected to be completed by September. F. Council Liaison Updates • Parks and Recreation Commission — Councilmember Fair provided an update on the commission meeting. Some of the items reviewed were a new commission member, vandalism, scholarship program, the Ellison house committee, and a presentation on the Downtown Area Study. • IEDC — Mayor Stumpf gave a brief overview of the meeting and mentioned that Dahlheimer is hosting a tour of their expansion on June 6, 2017. • Planning Commission — Councilmember Gabler provided an update which included the agenda items of CentraCare PUD amendment, Mills Fleet Farm sign amendment, Red Rooster PUD amendment, outdoor storage, and the Small Area Study. • I-94 Coalition — Charlotte Gabler noted that the Coalition received an update on the Corridors of Commerce funding. G. Department Updates • Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator, provided an update on the following: 1. The committee on the Ellison house has been established and there is still the need for an additional EDA member. Quotes were received and there is authorization to begin a hazardous waste survey of the house. 2. Cost estimates were obtained in regard to a safe sell sit and they were significant. This item will be addressed in the 2018 budget. City Council Minutes —June 12, 2017 Page 2 1 9 3. Wright County has a board meeting on June 13, 2017, at which time they will be voting on a local option sales tax. 4. Monticello has been invited by Sherburne County to attend a meeting on WWTP long range planning. Shibani Bisson gave an update on the Noise Barrier open house. Approximately 15 people attended and staff received positive feedback. Ms. Bisson also noted that a Special City Council workshop will be held on June 26 to review future street projects and funding. 2. Consent Agenda Councilmember Fair moved approval of the Consent Agenda excluding items D and J. Councilmember Hilgart seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. A. Consideration of approving the payment of bills. Recommendation: Approved the bill and purchase card registers for a total amount of $1,052,582.96. B. Consideration of approving new hires/departures. Recommendation: Approved the hires for the MCC, Liquor Store, and Water and the terminations for MCC and Parks. C. Consideration of approving the sale/disposal of surplus city property. Recommendation: Approved the surplus list as presented. D. Consideration of approving Resolution 2017-22 accepting donations for the Farmer's Market, Walk `n Roll, and Summer Movie in the Park series for a total donation amount of $1,443. Recommendation: ITEM WAS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA. E. Consideration of approving a Special Event Permit allowing use of Ellison Park, West Bridge Park, Pioneer Park, core City public right of way, Community Center parking lot and related city assistance in conjunction with the annual Riverfest community celebration on July 13-16, 2017. Recommendation: Approved the Special Event Permit allowing the use of Ellison Park, West Bridge Park, Pioneer Park, Community Center Parking Lot, City rights of way and related City staff assistance in conjunction with the annual Riverfest celebration on July 13-16, 2017, contingent on the continued site plan and traffic control coordination with Public Works and the Wright County Sheriffs Office and lot closure signage and notification in coordination with the Street Superintendent as needed. F. Consideration of approving a Special Event Permit allowing use of city streets and related assistance for the Downtown Block Party on July 12, 2017. Recommendation: Approved the Special Event Permit allowing temporary closing of Walnut Street from 7 a.m. until 10 p.m. on Wednesday, July 12, 2017, including the use of public parking facilities, staff resources and City Council Minutes —June 12, 2017 Page 3 1 9 amenities as described in the application, contingent on continues site coordination with Street Superintendent and restoration of the 3rd Street parking lot to satisfaction of Public Works Department. G. Consideration of approving a Special Event Permit allowing use of Ellison Park and related assistance in conjunction with Art in the Park/Taste of Monticello on Saturday, July 15, 2017. Recommendation: Approved the Special Event Permit allowing use of Ellison Park and related assistance in conjunction with the Art in the Park/Taste of the Town celebration on July 15, 2017. H. Consideration of adopting Ordinance 668 amending Title 3, Chapter 3, Section 5 — Municipal Liquor Store. Recommendation: Approved Ordinance 668 amending Title 3, Chapter 3, Section 5 — Municipal Liquor Ordinance. I. Consideration of approving Resolution 2017-23 calling for a public hearing and granting preliminary approving for the Issuance of Conduit Revenue Bonds for the benefit of SRCS Building Company. Recommendation: Approved Resolution 2017-23 calling for a public hearing granting preliminary approval for the issuance of conduit revenue bonds for the benefit of the SRCS Building Company. J. Consideration to renew 2017 membership in the MN Public Broadband Alliance for $1,500. Recommendation: ITEM WAS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA. K. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2017-24 approving a Master Partnership Contract with MnDOT. Recommendation: Approved Resolution 2017-24 approving a Master Partnership Contract with MnDOT. L. Consideration of approving Resolution 2017-25 accepting a petition and calling for a public hearing on July 10, 2017 on vacation of drainage and utility easements for Lot 2 and Lot 3, Block 1, Monticello Commerce Center Fifth Addition. Applicant: Laurentian Properties, LLC. Recommendation: Approved Resolution 2017-25 accepting the petition and calling for a public hearing on Monday, July 10, 2017 to consider the vacation of a portion of drainage and utility easements over and across Lot 2 and Lot 3, Block 1 Monticello Commerce Center Fifth Addition. M. Consideration of appointing a representative to the Parks and Recreation Commission. Recommendation: Approved the appointment of Karen Vetsch to the Monticello Parks and Recreation Commission with her term ending December 31, 2019. N. Consideration of approving a request for amendment to Mills Fleet Farm Planned Unit Development for proposed changes to signage. Applicant: Ramerth, Tim — Wideseth Smith Nolting. Recommendation: Approved Ordinance 670 City Council Minutes —June 12, 2017 Page 4 1 9 approving the amendment to the Mills Fleet Farm PUD Ordinance for sign allowances, per the submitted plans, based on the findings in Resolution No. PC -2017-010, and incorporating the conditions of Exhibit Z of the staff report. O. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2017-26 authorizing preparation of a Feasibility Report for 7th Street, Chelsea Road and Washington Street Improvements as related to the Fallon Avenue Overpass Project. Recommendation: Approved Resolution 2017-26 authorizing preparation of a Feasibility Report for improvements to 7th Street, Chelsea Road and Washington Street Improvements as related to the Fallon Avenue Overpass Project. P. Consideration of authorizing final design services for Fallon Avenue Overpass Project, City Project No. 16C006. Recommendation: Approved authorizing WSB to provide final design services at an estimated cost of $420,000 for the Fallon Avenue Overpass Project, City Project 16C006. Q. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2017-28 committing local matching funds for FAST ACT federal funding for the Fallon Avenue Overpass Project, City Project No. 16C006. Recommendation: Approved Resolution 2017-28 committing local matching funds for FAST ACT federal funding for the Fallon Avenue Overpass Project, City Project No. 16C006. R. Consideration of a request for amendment to Conditional Use Permit for Development and Final Stage Planned Unit Development for entrance and building additions in a B-2 (Limited Business) District. Applicant: Lemke, Lenore — CentraCare Health Monticello. Recommendation: Approved the amendment to Conditional Use Permit for Development Stage Planned Unit Development for CentraCare Health Monticello, contingent on compliance with the findings in Resolution #PC -2017-009 and those conditions specified in Exhibit Z. S. Consideration of approving Ordinance No. 671 for amendments to the Monticello Zoning Ordinance Chapter 4, Section 3 — Fences and Walls; Chapter 4, Section 5 for regulations for multi -tenant building signage, Chapter 5, Section 3 for regulations on Accessory Use Dwellings, and Chapter 5, Section 4 for regulations for Temporary Uses — Food Trucks. Applicant: City of Monticello. Recommendation: Approved Ordinance 671 for amendments to the Monticello Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 4, Section 3 — Fences and Walls; Chapter 4, Section 5 for regulations for multi -tenant building signage, Chapter 5, Section 3 for regulations on Accessory Use Dwellings, and Chapter 5, Section 4 for regulations for Temporary Uses — Food Trucks, based on findings in Resolution PC -2017-015. City Council Minutes —June 12, 2017 Page 5 1 9 2A. Consideration of items removed from the Consent Agenda for discussion. D. Consideration of approving Resolution 2017-22 accepting donations for the Farmer's Market, Walk `n Roll, and Summer Movie in the Park series for a total donation amount of ,$1,443. Mayor Stumpf removed the item from the Consent Agenda to recognize the donors — Stellis Health, Riverside Church, West Metro Buick, Quarry Community Church, Allina Health, and Lori and Charles Long. Mayor Stumpf moved approval of Resolution 2017-22 accepting donations. Councilmember Gabler seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. J. Consideration to renew 2017 membership in the MN Public Broadband Alliance for $1,500. Mayor Stumpf removed the item from the Consent Agenda and questioned the need for membership now that Arvig is operating as manager of Fibernet. Jeff O'Neill responded by noting its significance for networking, information exchange, and lobbying issues. Councilmember Gabler moved approval of renewing 2017 membership in the MN Public Broadband Alliance for $1,500. Councilmember Fair seconded the motion. Motion carried 4-1; Mayor Stumpf voted against. 4. Regular Agenda A. Consideration of a request for Comprehensive Plan Amendment for `Places to Shop' to `Places to Work' and a request for Rezoning from a B-4 (Regional Business) District to a I-1 (Light Industrial) District. Applicant: Jim Bowers and John Chadwick. Mayor Stumpf noted that the applicant requested that the City Council table the item. Councilmember Gabler moved to table the item per applicant's request. Councilmember Fair seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. B. Consideration of approving waiver of garbage disposal service charges for mobile home sites. Jeff O'Neill provided a brief background on garbage disposal service charges for mobile home sites. He referenced a letter from Kjellberg Inc. requesting that mobile home parks be switched from the commercial category to the single family category in regard to fees for service. Mr. O'Neill commented on a document that City Council Minutes —June 12, 2017 Page 6 1 9 was distributed at the meeting by Kjellberg Inc. He requested that this will need to be reviewed by staff. Wayne Oberg stated that the MN Attorney General's Office staff informed them that this decision is a policy matter and there is no statutory restriction. In addition, the City Attorney is comfortable with a denial of the request. Mr. Oberg displayed a schedule of property taxes and garbage fees for mobile homes versus rental units/duplexes versus rental unit/single family. Kirk Kjellberg, representing Kjellberg Inc., addressed the City Council. Mr. Kjellberg expressed his frustration with the current policy and would like to see the garbage service be provided to the mobile home owners in the same manner as other residents. In his opinion he feels that it is economic discrimination. Discussion ensued among the City Council. Councilmember Gabler questioned the process of paying for garbage since it isn't included in property taxes. Wayne Oberg responded that the owners of Kjellberg Inc. receive a monthly utility bill which include the garbage fees. Councilmember Gabler moved to table the item to further review the document distributed by Kjellberg Inc. at the meeting and the current city policy. Councilmember Davidson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. C. Consideration of authorizing notification of contract non -renewal to Veolia Water for Wastewater Treatment Plant services. Jeff O'Neill provided a brief overview and noted that the two-year extension of the prior five-year agreement with Veolia expires on December 31, 2017. The (5) year contract automatically renews for five years unless a written notice of nonrenewal is provided 120 days prior to expiration. The notice will provide the city the opportunity to study the contract further. Mayor Stumpf added that a final decision should be made by the end of the year. Councilmember Fair moved approval of authorizing notification of non- renewal to Veolia Water for Wastewater Treatment Plant services. Councilmember Hilgart seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. D. Consideration to modify Hi-Wav Liquor Hours to accommodate Sundav Sales. Wayne Oberg provided a brief introduction and noted that due to recently passed legislation the city is permitted to open on Sundays beginning July 2 between the hours of 11 a.m. and 6 p.m. He commented that staff supports allowing Hi -Way liquors to be open on two Sundays of the year — December 24 and December 31 while remaining closed all other Sundays. Randall Johnsen, Liquor Store Manager, presented to the City Council. He spoke of operational concerns and City Council Minutes —June 12, 2017 Page 7 1 9 quality of life. In Mr. Johnsen's opinion, the store should stay with the current schedule, which is closed on Sunday. He is concerned about the increased costs of opening the store on Sundays with additional revenue being unknown. Mr. Johnsen commented that there is the thought that no additional purchases would be made, but instead purchases would only shift from Saturday or Monday to Sunday. Discussion ensued among Council members. Mayor Stumpf commented that if the choice is to stay closed because of local values, then the store should be closed all Sundays and not open for the two holidays. Councilmember Gabler expressed that she would support a 3 -month trial period for Sunday sales. Councilmember Fair would not support being open every Sunday, but he agreed that there is value in being open some Sundays. Councilmember Hilgart would support being open a few Sundays but encouraged staff to make sure these days are advertised well. Councilmember Davidson commented that he doesn't have a problem being open the two Sundays but encouraged councilmembers to carefully consider the reasoning behind the decision. Councilmember Fair moved to approve changes to the liquor store schedule to allow Sunday sales on December 24 and December 31 of 2017 for hours allowed by Statute and to provide sales data at the end of the year. Councilmember Davidson seconded the motion. Motion carried 3-2; Mayor Stumpf and Councilmember Gabler voted against for reasons listed above. By consensus the meeting was adjourned at 8:17 p.m. Recorder: Jennifer Schreiber Approved: Attest: City Administrator City Council Minutes —June 12, 2017 Page 8 1 9 City Council Minutes —June 12, 2017 Page 9 19 City Council Agenda 06/26/2017 2A. Consideration of avvrovin2 vavment of bills (WO) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: City staff submits the attached bill registers and purchasing card registers for approval by Council. The bill registers contain all invoices processed and the purchasing card registers contain all card purchases made since the last Council meeting. Subject to MN Statutes, most invoices require Council approval prior to releasing checks for payment. The day following Council approval, payments will be released unless directed otherwise. A credit purchasing agreement and policy was approved by Council initially and card purchases must comply with the policy. If Council has no questions or comments on the bill and purchase card registers, these can be approved with the consent agenda. If requested, this item can be removed from consent and discussed prior to making a motion for approval. Al. Budget Impact: None A2. Staff Workload Impact: No additional work required B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the bill and purchase card registers for a total amount of $742,600.36. 2. Motion to approve the registers with changes directed by Council. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends Alternative #1 or #2, per direction of Council. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • Bill registers and Purchase Card registers Accounts Payable Computer Check Proof List by Vendor User: Debbie.Davidson T Printed: 06/16/2017 - 2:55PM Batch: 00201.06.2017 - 201.06.2017 US Bank Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Vendor: 4263 CAYAN Check Sequence: 1 372539 May 2017 (3) Genius Srv. Fee- cc machine renta 89.85 06/15/2017 609-49754-424100 372539 May 2017 (13,788) Trans. Fee 965.16 06/15/2017 609-49754-443980 Check Total: 1,055.01 Vendor: 3241 LINCOLN FINANCIAL GROUP Check Sequence: 2 6/1/2017 June 2017 1,733.14 06/15/2017 101-00000-217066 Check Total: 1,733.14 Vendor: 1593 MN DEPT OF REVENUE - ACH Check Sequence: 3 May May Use Tax - General 98.38 06/15/2017 101-00000-208100 May May Use Tax - General -0.38 06/15/2017 101-00000-362900 May May Waste Tax - General 717.21 06/15/2017 101-00000-208120 May May Waste Tax - General -0.21 06/15/2017 101-00000-362900 May May Use Tax - MCC 5,721.41 06/15/2017 226-00000-208100 May May Use Tax - MCC -0.41 06/15/2017 226-45122-362900 May May Use Tax - Water Fund 670.00 06/15/2017 601-00000-208100 May May Use Tax - Cemetary 4.50 06/15/2017 651-00000-208100 May May Use Tax - Cemetary 0.50 06/15/2017 651-49010-443990 May May Sales Tax - Hi Way Liquor 46,344.81 06/15/2017 609-00000-208100 May May Sales Tax - Hi Way Liquor 0.19 06/15/2017 609-49750-443990 May May Use Tax - Hi Way Liquor 7.01 06/15/2017 609-49754-421110 May May Use Tax - Hi Way Liquor -0.01 06/15/2017 609-00000-362900 Check Total: 53,563.00 Vendor: 1426 CITY OF MONTICELLO Check Sequence: 4 UB Apr 2017 UB 5250- Bridge Prk- 107 River St W 22.67 06/15/2017 101-45201-438200 UB Apr 2017 UB 7224 - WWTP 1,357.48 06/15/2017 602-49480-438200 UB Apr 2017 UB 7885 - Help Center 17.24 06/15/2017 217-41990-438200 UB Apr 2017 UB 8086 - 4th St. Warming House 13.66 06/15/2017 101-45201-438200 UB Apr 2017 UB 8114- Hi -Way Liquor 45.29 06/15/2017 609-49754-438200 Moiiii6effo Y Reference ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: True AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/16/2017 - 2:55 PM) Page 1 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number UB Apr 2017 UB 8117 - MCC 727.72 06/15/2017 226-45126-438200 UB Apr 2017 UB 8119 - Fire Station 17.24 06/15/2017 101-42200-438200 UB Apr 2017 UB 8120 - Bldg. hispec. Garage 13.66 06/15/2017 101-41940-438200 UB Apr 2017 UB 8177- Library 44.36 06/15/2017 101-45501-438200 UB Apr 2017 UB 8631- Animal Shelter -203 Chelsea Rd 13.66 06/15/2017 101-42700-438200 UB Apr 2017 UB 8903- PW Shop/Clerical 431.17 06/15/2017 101-43127-438200 UB Apr 2017 UB 8904 - PW Vehicle Storale 13.72 06/15/2017 101-43127-438200 UB Apr 2017 UB 8905 - PW Office 13.66 06/15/2017 101-43127-438200 UB Apr 2017 UB 10128- 118 6th St W- Office Facility 13.66 06/15/2017 101-41941-438200 Check Total: 2,745.19 Vendor: 4470 US BANK - BONDS Check Sequence: 5 0020373NS GO Bonds 2014A - Interest 80,680.63 06/15/2017 318-47000-461100 0020373NS GO Bonds 2014A - Interest 5,230.00 06/15/2017 703-00000-461100 0029083NS GO Bonds 2015B - Street Reconstruction & Imp 28,750.00 06/15/2017 319-47000-461100 0040903NS GO Bonds 2016A - Street Reconstruction & Imp 58,595.84 06/15/2017 320-47000-461100 Check Total: 173,256.47 Vendor: 2811 US BANK CORPORATE PMT SYSTEM Check Sequence: 6 06/06/2017 Boyer - refund tax charged -17.20 06/15/2017 101-43120-422110 06/06/2017 Grady's - misc. connectors; poly tubing 33.36 06/15/2017 101-45201-421650 06/06/2017 Grady's - plugs 1.29 06/15/2017 601-49440-422100 06/06/2017 Grady's - (6) hex screw 2.40 06/15/2017 101-45201-421650 06/06/2017 Grady's - GreatstuffFoaml2oz 4.59 06/15/2017 602-49490-422100 06/06/2017 Grady's - (2) bushing; teflon joint tape 5.97 06/15/2017 101-45201-421650 06/06/2017 Grady's - couple galv.; (2) nipple 5.97 06/15/2017 101-43120-421990 06/06/2017 Grady's - mounting tape 7.59 06/15/2017 101-45201-421650 06/06/2017 Fastenal - (200) misc. parts - Hot Box 9.68 06/15/2017 101-43120-422100 06/06/2017 Fastenal - (4) 17oz Marking Paint for prk. lots 9.88 06/15/2017 101-43120-421510 06/06/2017 Grady's -#125- couple; (3) connector; steel strap 12.75 06/15/2017 101-43120-422100 06/06/2017 Monti Napa- #130 trailer wire 15.39 06/15/2017 101-43120-422100 06/06/2017 Fastenal - safety vest 16.99 06/15/2017 101-43127-420650 06/06/2017 Home Depot - mailbox; letters- 501 4th St 20.71 06/15/2017 101-43120-421990 06/06/2017 Home Depot -(3) 100pk orange stake flags 23.94 06/15/2017 101-45201-421650 06/06/2017 Grady's -(4) 601b. contrete mix 26.36 06/15/2017 101-45201-421650 06/06/2017 Cub - resale - (30) limes; (10) lemons 28.70 06/15/2017 609-49750-425500 06/06/2017 Martie's -1 gal. Glystar 29.20 06/15/2017 101-43120-422500 06/06/2017 Martie's -1 gal. Glystar - weed killer center medi 29.20 06/15/2017 101-43120-422500 06/06/2017 Streichers - (6) name tags - Fire 30.00 06/15/2017 101-42200-421990 06/06/2017 Pipeline - curb box repair lid w/ plug 30.45 06/15/2017 601-49440-422100 06/06/2017 Runnings - clear box; (2) 6pk paper twls; (6) 24I 34.91 06/15/2017 101-42200-421990 Reference ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: True AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/16/2017 - 2:55 PM) Page 2 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 06/06/2017 Grady's - (2) padlocks; (6) 250pk keyblank 39.92 06/15/2017 101-45201-421650 06/06/2017 Runnings - replacement knife blades; (7) retract. 43.42 06/15/2017 101-43127-421990 06/06/2017 Martie's -Tuff Turf- seed Dundas Circle 49.00 06/15/2017 101-43120-422500 06/06/2017 Runnings - asst. pvc coupling; asst tee pvc; etc 72.78 06/15/2017 101-45201-421650 06/06/2017 Runnings - (6) 2pc rainsuit 101.94 06/15/2017 101-45201-420650 06/06/2017 Streichers - (3) Traffic Vests 104.97 06/15/2017 101-42200-421990 06/06/2017 G & K - mat srvc- #1043750053; 6043755726; E 163.36 06/15/2017 609-49754-431990 06/06/2017 Runnings -Trimmer- gas loop handle 323.96 06/15/2017 101-45201-421650 06/06/2017 Zep- (2) doz. Zep2000; (2) dz. Brake wash; cs C 521.46 06/15/2017 101-43127-421600 06/06/2017 City of Monti - ZPARKS-ELLPRK- permit 596.76 06/15/2017 229-45202-453010 06/06/2017 Spectrum Supply- Nitrile gloves; pap. twls; can 1 645.29 06/15/2017 101-45201-421650 06/06/2017 Martie's -30 gal drum Surge- broadleaf killer 1,858.80 06/15/2017 101-45201-421600 06/06/2017 Home Depot - threaded handle 4.98 06/15/2017 602-49490-421990 06/06/2017 Martie's -(2) Peat Moss 29.98 06/15/2017 101-45201-440900 06/06/2017 Monti Napa- (3) Nitrile D- Shop 38.97 06/15/2017 101-43120-421990 06/06/2017 General Rental - (2) 100 lb. propane- crack fillin 136.60 06/15/2017 101-43120-421990 06/06/2017 RAINWORKS.COM- invisable spray - Parks 158.30 06/15/2017 101-45201-421650 06/06/2017 Site One- utility pump hose;(2) rain shut off devi 419.20 06/15/2017 101-45201-421650 06/06/2017 PayPal- (5) bbq grill replacements 599.85 06/15/2017 101-45201-421650 06/06/2017 Martie's - 50 lbsTuff Turf 88.00 06/15/2017 101-45201-421650 06/06/2017 Cub - Batteries 6.39 06/15/2017 101-41310-421990 06/06/2017 Amazon - Return Printer Ribbon -139.94 06/15/2017 217-41990-421990 06/06/2017 NBP - Acrylic Sign Holders (8), Paper 118.82 06/15/2017 226-45122-421990 06/06/2017 NBP - Envelopes, Paper, Pens, Calculator 249.04 06/15/2017 217-41990-421990 06/06/2017 NBP - Tape, Post Its, Log Books 41.57 06/15/2017 101-41310-421990 06/06/2017 NBP - Label Writer Cleaning Cards 14.03 06/15/2017 101-41310-421990 06/06/2017 Holiday - Unleaded Fuel 8.251 gals @ $2.299 18.97 06/15/2017 217-41990-421200 06/06/2017 Walmart - Bananas, Cupcakes 51.95 06/15/2017 226-45125-425410 06/06/2017 Kwik Stop - Unleaded Fuel 9.670 gals @ $2.299 22.23 06/15/2017 217-41990-421200 06/06/2017 G & K - Mats Inv# 6043767101 15.60 06/15/2017 217-41990-421990 06/06/2017 Home Depot - Caution Tape (3 pk), Duct Tape (2 35.91 06/15/2017 226-45126-421990 06/06/2017 Home Depot - Hooks for FI 29.80 06/15/2017 226-45127-421981 06/06/2017 Home Depot - Spray for Weeds, Chain for Play 60.69 06/15/2017 226-45126-422990 06/06/2017 Home Depot - Ceiling Panels, Cable Hook 28.75 06/15/2017 101-45501-421990 06/06/2017 Home Depot - Extension Cord for Vacuums 9.68 06/15/2017 226-45126-421990 06/06/2017 Home Depot - Hooks for FI 2.97 06/15/2017 226-45127-421981 06/06/2017 Grady's - Bolts for Basketball Hoop (6) 6.50 06/15/2017 226-45126-440100 06/06/2017 Grady's - Screws for Hooks at FI 12.20 06/15/2017 226-45126-422990 06/06/2017 Grady's - Pain Roller, Tray, Brush, 10.77 06/15/2017 226-45126-422990 06/06/2017 Grady's - Anchors, Screws, Bug Stop 10.79 06/15/2017 226-45126-422990 06/06/2017 Office Max - Farmers Market Posters Laminated 23.88 06/15/2017 226-45127-421990 06/06/2017 Office Max - Phone for FI 48.99 06/15/2017 226-45127-421981 06/06/2017 Victory Parking - Parking @ Public Sector Digit. 11.00 06/15/2017 101-41310-433100 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/16/2017 - 2:55 PM) Page 3 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 06/06/2017 JP Cooke - Heavy Duty Deputy Dater Stamp (1) 77.07 06/15/2017 217-41990-421990 06/06/2017 3M Health & Service - Online Respirator Eval C 29.00 06/15/2017 101-41800-431990 06/06/2017 Domino's Pizza - Meal for Meeting 5/8 53.86 06/15/2017 101-41110-443990 06/06/2017 Lehigh Valley - Oscillating Wall Mount Fan for 1 242.98 06/15/2017 226-45124-421990 06/06/2017 US Post Office - Priority Mail 5lbs 10 oz 12.50 06/15/2017 217-41990-432200 06/06/2017 Fred Pryor Career Track - Excel Classes (2) DC 128.00 06/15/2017 101-42400-433100 06/06/2017 Grady's - All Purpose Glue, Nut 4.29 06/15/2017 226-45126-440440 06/06/2017 Horizon Pool - Certified Pool Operator Training 276.50 06/15/2017 226-45122-433100 06/06/2017 Home Depot - Hooks 38.74 06/15/2017 226-45126-422990 06/06/2017 Grady's -(2) elbow - irrigation parts 3.58 06/15/2017 101-45201-421650 06/06/2017 Monti Napa- Gr Hose; Super Duty Grease 13.18 06/15/2017 101-43127-421990 06/06/2017 Monti Napa- Blade 17.49 06/15/2017 101-43127-421990 06/06/2017 Cub - resale - (20) limes; (5) lemons 18.30 06/15/2017 609-49750-425500 06/06/2017 Grady's -valve sprinkler 19.99 06/15/2017 101-45201-421650 06/06/2017 Grady's -irrigation parts for downtown planters 25.70 06/15/2017 101-45201-421650 06/06/2017 General Rental - #140- (33 lbs) propane fill 27.13 06/15/2017 101-43120-421990 06/06/2017 Dakota Supply Group- curb bx repair lid w/ plug 30.45 06/15/2017 601-49440-421990 06/06/2017 Cub - Gatorade- Fire Dept. 33.95 06/15/2017 101-42200-421990 06/06/2017 Home Depot - sprinkler wire - 7th St/Hwy 25 37.17 06/15/2017 101-45201-421650 06/06/2017 Monti RV- soft bi-level brush; Por -fit Disc. Sub 45.56 06/15/2017 101-43127-421100 06/06/2017 Cub - resale - (60) limes 47.40 06/15/2017 609-49750-425500 06/06/2017 DISH- June service 64.16 06/15/2017 609-49754-432500 06/06/2017 Monti Napa- #124- (4) oil/grease seals 84.68 06/15/2017 101-43120-422100 06/06/2017 Auto Value -#124- battery; axle bearing; taper cu 92.95 06/15/2017 101-43120-422100 06/06/2017 Spectrum Supply -(12) cowhide gloves; (2) bx ea 110.10 06/15/2017 101-45201-421650 06/06/2017 Spectrum Supply -credit (12) pigskin gloves -149.28 06/15/2017 101-45201-421650 06/06/2017 Spectrum Supply(12) XL cowhide gloves; (24) I 161.04 06/15/2017 101-43120-420650 06/06/2017 Dyna - shop supplies- (5) cryobits; (50) cap scre, 157.87 06/15/2017 101-43127-421990 06/06/2017 Sherwin Williams - (20) 5 gal. white 206.00 06/15/2017 101-45201-422990 06/06/2017 TRS- (12) 600pk Labels;(6) 250ct labels 283.87 06/15/2017 609-49754-421990 06/06/2017 Elk River Landfill- (2.55) T- MSW- Farm Junk 356.42 06/15/2017 101-43127-431990 06/06/2017 Aramark - uniforms April 2017- Parks 109.92 06/15/2017 101-45201-441700 06/06/2017 Aramark - uniforms April 2017- Sewer 72.72 06/15/2017 602-49490-441700 06/06/2017 Aramark - uniforms April 2017- Water 72.72 06/15/2017 601-49440-441700 06/06/2017 Aramark - uniforms April 2017- PW 181.22 06/15/2017 101-43120-441700 06/06/2017 Aramark - shop towels -April 2017- PW 168.14 06/15/2017 101-43127-421990 06/06/2017 WHCE- Street Light contract 3/16-4/15 1,964.05 06/15/2017 101-43160-431900 06/06/2017 WHCE- Sunset Ponds 321 kWh 54.04 06/15/2017 602-49490-438100 06/06/2017 WHCE- 1645 & 1675 CR 39 37.43 06/15/2017 602-49490-438100 06/06/2017 WHCE- DMV 19.95 06/15/2017 217-41990-431900 06/06/2017 WHCE- 2171 W River St- Parks 36.45 06/15/2017 101-45201-431900 06/06/2017 WHCE- Fire Dept 27.95 06/15/2017 101-42200-431900 06/06/2017 WHCE-5980 Jason Ave- Water 19.95 06/15/2017 601-49440-431900 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/16/2017 - 2:55 PM) Page 4 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 06/06/2017 WHCE-MCC 27.95 06/15/2017 226-45126-431900 06/06/2017 WHCE- 207 Chelsea Rd. 32.95 06/15/2017 601-49440-431900 06/06/2017 WHCE- 209 Cedar St. 29.95 06/15/2017 601-49440-431900 06/06/2017 WHCE- 132 E Broadway St. 29.95 06/15/2017 601-49440-431900 06/06/2017 WHCE- 107 River St. W 19.95 06/15/2017 101-45201-431900 06/06/2017 WHCE- Hi -Way Liquor June 2017 21.32 06/15/2017 609-49754-431900 06/06/2017 WHCE- MCC June 2017 19.95 06/15/2017 226-45126-431900 06/06/2017 WHCE- 200 Dundas Rd June 2017 29.95 06/15/2017 601-49440-431900 06/06/2017 WHCE- 909Golf Crs. Rd June 2017 19.95 06/15/2017 101-43110-431900 06/06/2017 WHCE-- General Street Lighting 1,292.60 06/15/2017 101-43160-438100 06/06/2017 Advanced Disposal - April 2017 37,776.25 06/15/2017 101-43230-438400 06/06/2017 Advanced Disposal - April 2017 - Recycling 12,559.95 06/15/2017 101-43230-438400 06/06/2017 Advanced Disposal - April 2017 35.80 06/15/2017 101-43127-438400 06/06/2017 Advanced Disposal - April 2017 47.74 06/15/2017 101-45201-438400 06/06/2017 Advanced Disposal - April 2017 23.87 06/15/2017 101-45201-438400 06/06/2017 Advanced Disposal - April 2017 113.38 06/15/2017 602-49480-438400 06/06/2017 Advanced Disposal - April 2017 247.48 06/15/2017 226-45122-438400 06/06/2017 Advanced Disposal - April 2017 11.93 06/15/2017 101-45501-431990 06/06/2017 Advanced Disposal - April 2017 23.87 06/15/2017 609-49754-438400 06/06/2017 Advanced Disposal - April 2017 23.87 06/15/2017 101-45201-438400 06/06/2017 Walmart - File Folders 8.44 06/15/2017 226-45122-421990 06/06/2017 Walmart - Protein Bars, Apples, Bananas for Coi 37.26 06/15/2017 226-45125-425410 06/06/2017 Walmart - First Aid Kit 5.87 06/15/2017 226-45124-421990 06/06/2017 Walmart - Bikes for Walk & Roll (20) 1,143.68 06/15/2017 101-45130-444140 06/06/2017 Walmart - Bikes for Walk & Roll (18) 1,512.37 06/15/2017 101-45130-444140 06/06/2017 Walmart - Bikes for Walk & Roll (4) 367.94 06/15/2017 101-45130-444140 06/06/2017 Runnings - Tires for Two Wheeler (2) 39.98 06/15/2017 226-45126-421990 06/06/2017 Constant Contact - Monthly Email Service 60.00 06/15/2017 226-45122-430900 06/06/2017 Wall Street Journal - Monthly Subscription WO 36.99 06/15/2017 101-41520-443300 06/06/2017 Office Max - Printer for MCC at Prairie Center ( 199.99 06/15/2017 702-00000-424100 06/06/2017 Monti Chamber - April Lunch JT 15.00 06/15/2017 213-46301-443300 06/06/2017 Monti Chamber - May Lunch RL 15.00 06/15/2017 101-41310-443990 06/06/2017 Grady's - Painting Brush; Tape 18.48 06/15/2017 226-45126-421990 06/06/2017 Grady's - Screws & Anchors 13.99 06/15/2017 226-45126-421990 06/06/2017 Grady's - O Ring for Sink 1.29 06/15/2017 226-45126-422990 06/06/2017 Grady's - Ear Plugs 3.49 06/15/2017 226-45126-421990 06/06/2017 Sherwin Williams - 5 Gal Paint, 1 Gal Paint, & S 374.39 06/15/2017 226-45126-440100 06/06/2017 Target - Food for Special Council Meeting 36.57 06/15/2017 101-41110-443990 06/06/2017 Cub - Snacks for CPR/AED Training Session 18.53 06/15/2017 101-41800-443990 06/06/2017 Holiday - Unleaded Fuel 9.226 gals @ $2.359 21.76 06/15/2017 217-41990-421200 06/06/2017 Randy's - Shredding Service (DMV) 17.62 06/15/2017 217-41990-431990 06/06/2017 Randy's - Shredding Service (CH) 17.62 06/15/2017 101-41310-431990 06/06/2017 Paula Paulsen - Draping for Wedding 425.00 06/15/2017 226-45123-431990 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/16/2017 - 2:55 PM) Page 5 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 06/06/2017 Verizon - March 21 - April 20 26.02 06/15/2017 101-43120-432100 06/06/2017 Verizon - March 21 - April 20 140.04 06/15/2017 101-42200-432100 06/06/2017 Verizon - April 4 - May 3 50.71 06/15/2017 101-42400-432100 06/06/2017 Verizon - April 4 - May 3 31.27 06/15/2017 226-45122-432100 06/06/2017 Verizon - April 4 - May 3 104.82 06/15/2017 101-43120-432100 06/06/2017 Verizon - April 4 - May 3 45.99 06/15/2017 601-49440-432100 06/06/2017 NBP - Paper 299.56 06/15/2017 101-41310-421990 06/06/2017 NBP - Laminating Pouches, Markers, Plates, Let 250.80 06/15/2017 101-41310-421990 06/06/2017 NBP - Clipboard, Paper 4.85 06/15/2017 226-45122-421990 06/06/2017 Home Depot - Gift Card for Safety Bingo Prize 35.00 06/15/2017 101-41800-421990 06/06/2017 Home Depot - Air Mover Fan 199.00 06/15/2017 226-45126-421990 06/06/2017 Home Depot - Toilet Seats (2) 47.96 06/15/2017 226-45126-440100 06/06/2017 Home Depot - Door Stops (2 pks) 8.42 06/15/2017 226-45126-422990 06/06/2017 Home Depot - Wall Scrappers for Waxing Projec 17.93 06/15/2017 226-45126-421990 06/06/2017 G & K - Uniforms, Towels, Mops (3 invoices) 221.13 06/15/2017 226-45126-431990 06/06/2017 G & K - Uniforms, Towels, Mops (3 invoices) 148.14 06/15/2017 226-45126-431990 06/06/2017 Mail Finance - Postage Machine Lease Payment 564.33 06/15/2017 101-41310-441500 06/06/2017 Monti Napa - Plug & Bolts for Scrubber 2.91 06/15/2017 226-45126-422990 06/06/2017 Verizon - April 4 - May 3 45.99 06/15/2017 602-49490-432100 06/06/2017 Grady's -Padlock 13.99 06/15/2017 101-42200-421990 06/06/2017 Monti Napa- filter for generator lift station 17.18 06/15/2017 602-49490-422100 06/06/2017 Monti Napa -(2) filter for generator lift station 20.66 06/15/2017 602-49490-422100 06/06/2017 Grady's - saw hole; drill bit 18.58 06/15/2017 101-43127-421990 06/06/2017 Monti Napa- #113; 109- (2) connnectors 19.38 06/15/2017 101-43120-422110 06/06/2017 Facebook- Wine Sale Post Boost 20.00 06/15/2017 609-49754-434990 06/06/2017 Fastenal -crimp tool; (100) cable tie 24.58 06/15/2017 601-49440-421990 06/06/2017 Fastenal -4th St. Hoops- Brite Mark; misc. 26.44 06/15/2017 101-45201-421650 06/06/2017 Runnings -flashlight 26.71 06/15/2017 602-49490-421990 06/06/2017 Auto Value -trailers- (3) 7 Pole RV Blade 29.97 06/15/2017 101-43120-422100 06/06/2017 Cub - resale - (50) limes; (10) lemons 49.40 06/15/2017 609-49750-425500 06/06/2017 Home Depot -(3) 16" Drain Spade - Cedar 104.91 06/15/2017 101-43130-421990 06/06/2017 Home Depot -(100 lb) propane fill 136.60 06/15/2017 101-43120-421990 06/06/2017 Sherwin Williams - Bridge Vandalism -(5) 5 gal 229.45 06/15/2017 101-45201-422990 06/06/2017 Sherwin Williams - return (5) 5 gal Yellow 4/13/ -80.00 06/15/2017 101-45201-422990 06/06/2017 G & K - mat srvc-# 6043767103; 6043772822; E 162.02 06/15/2017 609-49754-431990 06/06/2017 Safety Kleen- (8) waste combustable liquid 192.01 06/15/2017 101-43127-431990 06/06/2017 Big Lake Lumber- ZPARKS-ELLPRK - Flex Wi 198.82 06/15/2017 229-45202-453010 06/06/2017 Monti Napa- shop- 5W30 qrt oil; misc. filters; et 259.80 06/15/2017 101-43127-422120 06/06/2017 Arctic Glacier - resale inv. #1956712812; 19567 878.96 06/15/2017 609-49750-425500 06/06/2017 TRS- Total Care Keystroke- renwl; renewal Soft 1,485.56 06/15/2017 609-49754-431900 06/06/2017 Martie's -adopt a park- 7 invoices- plants 2,461.83 06/15/2017 101-45201-440900 06/06/2017 NightHawk- Fire Alarm Panel replaced- New Ve 1,475.95 06/15/2017 101-42200-431900 06/06/2017 NightHawk- Security monitor/cellular- June; par 84.28 06/15/2017 101-42200-431900 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/16/2017 - 2:55 PM) Page 6 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 06/06/2017 Cub - resale - (25) limes; (25) lemons 39.50 06/15/2017 609-49750-425500 06/06/2017 Cub - resale - (30) limes; (10) lemons 33.60 06/15/2017 609-49750-425500 06/06/2017 Cub - Paper Plates for Concession 9.98 06/15/2017 226-45125-421990 06/06/2017 Home Depot - ZPARKS ELLPRK - 2x4xl2 - (1: 64.08 06/15/2017 229-45202-453010 06/06/2017 Home Depot - ZPARKS ELLPRK - Various Boa 471.27 06/15/2017 229-45202-453010 06/06/2017 Home Depot - ZPARKS ELLPRK - 2x8x8 (5); 2 152.23 06/15/2017 229-45202-453010 06/06/2017 Home Depot - Door Bell for Front Desk 16.97 06/15/2017 226-45122-421990 06/06/2017 Home Depot - Smoke/CO2 Detectors, Door Aler 238.81 06/15/2017 226-45127-421981 06/06/2017 NBP - Batteries, Tape, Staples, Candy 136.34 06/15/2017 609-49754-421990 06/06/2017 Walmart - Food for Training Session 17.80 06/15/2017 101-41800-443990 06/06/2017 Walmart - Lighters for Candles for Weddings (4) 4.00 06/15/2017 226-45123-421990 06/06/2017 Walmart - 3M Hooks, Curtain, Dry Erase Board 40.19 06/15/2017 226-45127-421981 06/06/2017 Monti Napa- Lens (3) 7.47 06/15/2017 101-43120-422100 06/06/2017 Monti Napa- Sealer for Sweeper (2) 36.32 06/15/2017 101-43120-422100 06/06/2017 Grady's - Rings & Nuts (4) 0.72 06/15/2017 226-45126-422990 06/06/2017 Grady's - Knife, Blades, 13.17 06/15/2017 101-45201-421650 06/06/2017 Grady's - Lube for Pool Equip; Graphite for Doo 9.96 06/15/2017 226-45126-421990 06/06/2017 Grady's - Keys (2); Hose 48.97 06/15/2017 226-45126-421990 06/06/2017 Target - Food for Small Area Study Open House 23.75 06/15/2017 101-41110-443990 06/06/2017 Target - Food for Small Area Study Open House 23.75 06/15/2017 101-41910-443990 06/06/2017 Target - Food for Small Area Study Open House 23.75 06/15/2017 213-46301-443990 06/06/2017 Tavern @ Wild Marsh - Admin Luncheon JO 16.35 06/15/2017 101-41310-433100 06/06/2017 Tavern @ Wild Marsh - Admin Luncheon JO 0.37 06/15/2017 101-00000-115030 06/06/2017 Monti Printing - Observation Notices (2,000) 336.00 06/15/2017 101-42400-421990 06/06/2017 When To Work.com - Staff Scheduling Program 80.00 06/15/2017 226-45127-421981 06/06/2017 Net Brands Media - Wristbands for Walk & Roll 148.03 06/15/2017 226-45122-421990 06/06/2017 Net Brands Media - Wristbands for FI 71.90 06/15/2017 226-45127-421981 06/06/2017 MRO Supply - Vinyl Floor Mat (5) 999.00 06/15/2017 226-45124-421990 06/06/2017 Holiday - Unleaded Fuel 9.906 gals @ $2.399 23.76 06/15/2017 217-41990-421200 06/06/2017 Dollar Tree - Napkins 1.00 06/15/2017 217-41990-421990 06/06/2017 Dollar Tree - Giveaway Items for Walk & Roll 18.00 06/15/2017 217-41990-434990 06/06/2017 Martie's - Tretlan (2) 70.00 06/15/2017 101-45201-421600 06/06/2017 Runnings - Chain 14" 16.95 06/15/2017 101-43127-422100 06/06/2017 Cub - Juice for Training 8.55 06/15/2017 101-41800-443990 06/06/2017 Domino's Pizza - Meal for Open House 5/31 68.03 06/15/2017 226-45127-421981 06/06/2017 Streichers - Face Cap Assembly & Lamp 19.98 06/15/2017 101-42200-421990 06/06/2017 Dakota Supply Group - Valve for Washing Hose 28.92 06/15/2017 101-42200-422100 06/06/2017 Fastenal - Safety Vest, T Shirt, Weld Gloves, Eye 75.34 06/15/2017 101-43120-420650 06/06/2017 General Credit Forms - Credit Card Paper 95.93 06/15/2017 217-41990-421990 06/06/2017 Nat'l Recreation & Park Assoc - Membership Du 165.00 06/15/2017 226-45122-443300 06/06/2017 Trusted Employees - Background Checks (4) 106.00 06/15/2017 226-45122-431990 06/06/2017 Trusted Employees - Background Checks (2) 79.00 06/15/2017 101-45201-431990 06/06/2017 Trusted Employees - Background Checks (2) 74.00 06/15/2017 101-43120-431990 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/16/2017 - 2:55 PM) Page 7 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 06/06/2017 Trusted Employees - Background Checks (3) 69.00 06/15/2017 609-49754-431990 06/06/2017 Trusted Employees - Background Checks (1) 18.50 06/15/2017 601-49440-431990 06/06/2017 Trusted Employees - Background Checks (1) 18.50 06/15/2017 602-49490-431990 06/06/2017 MN Pollution Control - WWTP WaterApplicatic 1,240.00 06/15/2017 602-49480-443700 06/06/2017 Dakota Paper - First Aid Items 44.14 06/15/2017 226-45122-421990 06/06/2017 Dakota Paper - Bathroom & Locker Room Supp] 1,974.27 06/15/2017 226-45126-421990 06/06/2017 Dakota Paper - Concession Supplies 98.96 06/15/2017 226-45125-421990 06/06/2017 Dakota Paper - Trash Can Liners 29.64 06/15/2017 101-41941-421990 06/06/2017 Dakota Paper - Trash Can Liners 26.14 06/15/2017 101-45501-421990 06/06/2017 Fastenal - Ear Plugs (200) 43.72 06/15/2017 101-43120-420650 06/06/2017 Home Depot - (4) 601b concrete mix 12.40 06/15/2017 101-45201-421650 06/06/2017 Runnings - valve in line; solenoid replacement -1 27.48 06/15/2017 101-45201-421650 06/06/2017 Auto Value -trailer- (4) grease seals 47.96 06/15/2017 101-45201-421650 06/06/2017 Dakota Supply Group -(40) pvc pipe; rainshine t 51.27 06/15/2017 101-45201-421650 06/06/2017 Grady's - Irrig. & sprayer- Mag 2" combo; valve 53.14 06/15/2017 101-45201-421650 06/06/2017 Midway Iron & Metal- ZPARKS-ELLSPRK-8' s 88.80 06/15/2017 229-45202-453010 06/06/2017 Home Depot - (40) 801b concrete mix 172.00 06/15/2017 101-45201-421650 06/06/2017 Home Depot -ZPARKS-ELLPRK - Brt. Smth Pa 336.35 06/15/2017 229-45202-453010 06/06/2017 Rivard Co.- Central Wood Prod- (100) yds mulcl 1,604.95 06/15/2017 101-45201-422500 06/06/2017 Grady's -(2) 249-L Soc CP; (2) washer flat 1.14 06/15/2017 101-42200-421990 06/06/2017 Grady's 4132- padlock 12.99 06/15/2017 101-43120-422100 06/06/2017 Amazon - Time Card Rack - Buddy Products 31.11 06/15/2017 101-45201-421650 06/06/2017 Monti Napa- UHl- Mul-Tow Con; connector - F 37.48 06/15/2017 101-42200-422110 06/06/2017 Amazon - Displays2go- acrylic sign holder 38.99 06/15/2017 101-45201-421650 06/06/2017 Monti Napa- #132 & shop- Battery; grease can;, 102.72 06/15/2017 101-43120-422100 06/06/2017 OSC- (2) Blade; (5) Elctd: T80/T60; (5) shld Ca 234.12 06/15/2017 101-43127-421520 06/06/2017 Northern Tool- (2) covered BBQ Grill Smoker -1 709.98 06/15/2017 101-45201-421650 06/06/2017 Grady's - (4) keyblank - 1/2 3.98 06/15/2017 601-49440-422300 06/06/2017 Grady's - (4) keyblank - 1/2 3.98 06/15/2017 602-49490-421990 06/06/2017 Grady's-ZPARKS- ELLPRK- couple; (2) elbow 15.77 06/15/2017 229-45202-453010 06/06/2017 Home Depot -ZPARKS-ELLPRK- Alum Square 19.93 06/15/2017 229-45202-453010 06/06/2017 Home Depot -ZPARKS-ELLPRK- (4) RZB 16B 103.88 06/15/2017 229-45202-453010 06/06/2017 Cub - Walk & Roll water tasting- (5) cups; (2 1) 33.60 06/15/2017 601-49440-421990 06/06/2017 General Rental - (2) 20# propane fill 35.56 06/15/2017 101-43120-421990 06/06/2017 MN Dept. Health- Monitoring Well Permit 5893, 50.00 06/15/2017 601-49440-443700 06/06/2017 Facebook- Farmer's Market Ad 5.00 06/15/2017 226-00000-220100 06/06/2017 US Post Office - Postage Stamps for Mailing 40.38 06/15/2017 101-41910-432200 06/06/2017 Monti Chamber - City Float in Riverfest Parade 50.00 06/15/2017 101-41310-443990 06/06/2017 Amazon - Batteries (3/48 pks); Vinyl Chair Mat 73.51 06/15/2017 226-45122-421990 06/06/2017 Amazon - Lego's for FI 160.91 06/15/2017 226-45127-421981 06/06/2017 US Bank Quarterly Rebate -5,104.87 06/15/2017 101-00000-362970 06/06/2017 NBP - utx- Riverfest Parade candy 393.34 06/15/2017 609-49754-421990 06/06/2017 Cap City Parking - Parking Fee @ MN DEED M 11.00 06/15/2017 213-46301-433100 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/16/2017 - 2:55 PM) Page 8 Invoice No 06/06/2017 Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Grand View Lodge - EDAM Meeting Lodging (F 340.38 06/15/2017 213-46301-433100 Check Total: 86,524.16 Total for Check Run: 318,876.97 Total of Number of Checks: The preceding list of bills payable was reviewed and approved for payment. Date: 6/26/17 Approved by Mayor Brian Stumpf AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/16/2017 - 2:55 PM) Page 9 Accounts Payable Computer Check Proof List by Vendor User: Julie.Cheney Printed: 06/21/2017 - 2:09PM Batch: 00204.06.2017 - 204.06.2017 AP Invoice No Description Vendor: 2087 ALL WAYS HEATING AND AC INC 5772 809.45 Replaced Motor & Capacitor Check Total: Vendor: 1977 ANCOM COMMUNICATIONS INC 70128 (5) Minitor V Standard Charger 101-42200-421990 238.00 Check Total: Vendor: 3991 ANOKA RAMSEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE 00417865 CPR & AED Training 5/23 - Contract #849 700.00 Check Total: Vendor: 1039 AQUA LOGIC INC 46308 Sand & Lateral Replacement Check Total: Vendor: 3491 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3183226 850.00 resale- beer Check Total: Vendor: 4502 ARVIG 6/8/2017 Battery Backup/Surge Protector/Server/Desktop 6/8/2017 157.50 IT Services - May/June 2017 Check Total: Vendor: 1062 BEAUDRY OIL COMPANY 450846 (3) cylinder gas for forklift Amount Payment Date Acct Number Check Sequence: 1 809.45 06/27/2017 226-45126-431990 809.45 Check Sequence: 2 238.00 06/27/2017 101-42200-421990 238.00 Check Sequence: 3 700.00 06/27/2017 101-41800-431960 700.00 Check Sequence: 4 850.00 06/27/2017 226-45126-431990 850.00 Check Sequence: 5 157.50 06/27/2017 609-49750-425200 157.50 Check Sequence: 6 3,558.48 06/27/2017 702-00000-424100 7,215.00 06/27/2017 702-00000-431990 10,773.48 Check Sequence: 7 58.00 06/27/2017 101-43120-421200 Moiiii6effo Y Reference ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: True AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/21/2017 - 2:09 PM) Page 1 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/21/2017 - 2:09 PM) Page 2 Check Total: 58.00 Vendor: 1065 BELLBOY CORPORATION Check Sequence: 8 ACH Enabled: True 59147000 freight -2.20 06/27/2017 609-49750-433300 59147000 resale - liquor credit inv. #59118800 -92.00 06/27/2017 609-49750-425100 59220400 resale - liquor 546.00 06/27/2017 609-49750-425100 59220400 freight 11.00 06/27/2017 609-49750-433300 59322600 resale - liquor 905.10 06/27/2017 609-49750-425100 59322600 freight 16.13 06/27/2017 609-49750-433300 95897300 resale - liquor credit -2.63 06/27/2017 609-49750-425100 95910500 resale - mix 60.00 06/27/2017 609-49750-425400 95910500 freight 0.27 06/27/2017 609-49750-433300 95974900 freight 0.39 06/27/2017 609-49750-433300 95974900 resale - mix 84.49 06/27/2017 609-49750-425400 Check Total: 1,526.55 Vendor: 1067 BERNICK'S Check Sequence: 9 ACH Enabled: False 63268 resale - soda pop 85.60 06/27/2017 609-49750-425400 63268 resale -juice 32.80 06/27/2017 609-49750-425500 63269 resale - beer 1,922.55 06/27/2017 609-49750-425200 64092 resale - pop, gatorade, water, juice 478.55 06/27/2017 226-45125-425410 66511 resale - soda pop 160.25 06/27/2017 609-49750-425400 66511 resale -juice 32.80 06/27/2017 609-49750-425500 67138 resale - pop, gatorade, water, juice 300.00 06/27/2017 226-45125-425410 68512 resale - beer 2,484.75 06/27/2017 609-49750-425200 Check Total: 5,497.30 Vendor: 1080 BRAEMAR MAILING SERVICE INC Check Sequence: 10 ACH Enabled: False 58110 UB May 2017 Invoices - (3773) FNM Insert 37.73 06/27/2017 656-49870-434990 58110 UB May 2017 Invoices - (3773) Print, Fold, Env 553.08 06/27/2017 601-49440-431800 58110 UB May 2017 Invoices - (3773) Print, Fold, Env 553.09 06/27/2017 602-49490-431800 Check Total: 1,143.90 Vendor: 3632 BRIAN BRAMLEY Check Sequence: 11 ACH Enabled: True 8881 Emergency Response - (7) Extication gloves 281.74 06/27/2017 101-42200-421120 8886 Emergency Response - (4) Helmets 1,148.81 06/27/2017 101-42200-421120 8899 Emergency Response - (5) PAC II P-84 Hood 199.35 06/27/2017 101-42200-421120 8903 Emergency Response - (2) Firedex FDXL leathe 601.16 06/27/2017 101-42200-421120 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/21/2017 - 2:09 PM) Page 2 Invoice No Description Check Total: AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/21/2017 - 2:09 PM) Amount Payment Date Acct Number 2,231.06 633.50 150.26 12.37 130.50 1,520.35 524.27 36.59 36.00 83.10 3,126.94 961.00 160.00 320.00 320.00 126.62 64.00 1,951.62 15,133.95 226.80 18,291.85 64.20 -47.25 33,669.55 75.60 75.60 7.91 7.91 Check Sequence: 12 06/27/2017 609-49750-425100 06/27/2017 609-49750-425300 06/27/2017 609-49750-433300 06/27/2017 609-49750-425200 06/27/2017 609-49750-425100 06/27/2017 609-49750-425300 06/27/2017 609-49750-433300 06/27/2017 609-49750-425400 06/27/2017 609-49750-425200 Check Sequence: 13 06/27/2017 101-41610-430400 06/27/2017 101-00000-220110 06/27/2017 101-41910-430400 06/27/2017 101-00000-220110 06/27/2017 101-42400-430400 06/27/2017 400-43300-451020 Check Sequence: 14 06/27/2017 609-49750-425200 06/27/2017 609-49750-425400 06/27/2017 609-49750-425200 06/27/2017 609-49750-425400 06/27/2017 609-49750-425200 Check Sequence: 15 06/27/2017 226-45124-421600 Check Sequence: 16 06/27/2017 101-41110-431990 Reference ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False Page 3 Check Total: Vendor: 4328 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN WINE & SPII 1080646590 resale - liquor 1080646590 resale - wine 1080646590 freight 1080646591 resale - beer 1080649444 resale - liquor 1080649444 resale - wine 1080649444 freight 1080649444 resale - wine n/a 1080649445 resale - beer Check Total: Vendor: 1091 CAMPBELL KNUTSON PA 2348-000G 178 General Legal - May 2017 2348-000G 178 201706 - Prairie Ponds PUD - May 2017 2348-000G 178 Planning & Zoning - May 2017 2348-000G 178 201720 - -May 2017 2348-001 G 105 General Code Enforcement - May 2017 2348-125G 21 16C006 - Church of St.Henrys/Fallon Ave Impro Check Total: Vendor: 4646 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES L.P. 1906903 resale - beer 1906903 resale - beer n/a 1915534 resale - beer 1915534 resale - mix 365-60 resale - beer credit Check Total: Vendor: 1106 CENTRAL MCGOWAN INC 00125485 Bulk Carbon Dioxide (243 lbs) Check Total: Vendor: 4315 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 6/1/2017 Digital Receiver Check Total: AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/21/2017 - 2:09 PM) Amount Payment Date Acct Number 2,231.06 633.50 150.26 12.37 130.50 1,520.35 524.27 36.59 36.00 83.10 3,126.94 961.00 160.00 320.00 320.00 126.62 64.00 1,951.62 15,133.95 226.80 18,291.85 64.20 -47.25 33,669.55 75.60 75.60 7.91 7.91 Check Sequence: 12 06/27/2017 609-49750-425100 06/27/2017 609-49750-425300 06/27/2017 609-49750-433300 06/27/2017 609-49750-425200 06/27/2017 609-49750-425100 06/27/2017 609-49750-425300 06/27/2017 609-49750-433300 06/27/2017 609-49750-425400 06/27/2017 609-49750-425200 Check Sequence: 13 06/27/2017 101-41610-430400 06/27/2017 101-00000-220110 06/27/2017 101-41910-430400 06/27/2017 101-00000-220110 06/27/2017 101-42400-430400 06/27/2017 400-43300-451020 Check Sequence: 14 06/27/2017 609-49750-425200 06/27/2017 609-49750-425400 06/27/2017 609-49750-425200 06/27/2017 609-49750-425400 06/27/2017 609-49750-425200 Check Sequence: 15 06/27/2017 226-45124-421600 Check Sequence: 16 06/27/2017 101-41110-431990 Reference ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False Page 3 Invoice No Description Vendor: 3831 RAELYNN COOK 6/20/2017 Mileage Reimbursement - Payroll Northstar Cha Check Sequence: 17 Check Total: Vendor: 4329 MITCH COOPMAN 06/03/17 101-41520-433100 (3) donuts- Cub reimbursed Check Total: Vendor: 4694 CUNNINGHAM GROUP ARCHITECTURE IN 47760 Small Area Plan Through May 2017 Check Sequence: 18 Check Total: Vendor: 2935 CUSTOMIZED FIRE RESCUE TRAINING IN( 1049 101-42200-421990 Cargill Rmbrs.- Confined Space; Haz.Mat; High 1050 MBFTE Rmbrs.- Active Shooter Response; Rea( Check Total: Vendor: 1129 DAHLHEIMER BEVERAGE LLC 1283856 Check Sequence: 19 resale -beer 1283867 False resale -liquor 1283867 213-46301-431990 resale -mix 149133 resale -rootbeer 149588 resale -beer 150218 resale -beer 150269 Check Sequence: 20 resale -beer 150460 False resale -beer 150644 101-42200-433100 resale -beer 150644 resale -beer n/a 150701 101-42200-433100 resale -beer credit inv. 150460 151027 resale -beer Check Total: Vendor: 4475 DAKOTA SUPPLY GROUP D083706 Freon - 301b Cylinder Check Total: Vendor: 1131 DAMA METAL PRODUCTS INC 14521 S-3 Model F.D. Key Box w/Tamper SW - For R( Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Check Sequence: 17 ACH Enabled: True 33.01 06/27/2017 101-41520-433100 33.01 Check Sequence: 18 ACH Enabled: True 26.97 06/27/2017 101-42200-421990 26.97 Check Sequence: 19 ACH Enabled: False 25,000.00 06/27/2017 213-46301-431990 25,000.00 Check Sequence: 20 ACH Enabled: False 2,000.00 06/27/2017 101-42200-433100 2,200.00 06/27/2017 101-42200-433100 4,200.00 Check Sequence: 21 ACH Enabled: True 112.00 06/27/2017 609-49750-425200 41,853.85 06/27/2017 609-49750-425100 283.00 06/27/2017 609-49750-425400 74.00 06/27/2017 609-49750-425400 1,890.30 06/27/2017 609-49750-425200 2,362.50 06/27/2017 609-49750-425200 962.40 06/27/2017 609-49750-425200 680.83 06/27/2017 609-49750-425200 2,824.03 06/27/2017 609-49750-425200 33.60 06/27/2017 609-49750-425400 -9.82 06/27/2017 609-49750-425200 687.30 06/27/2017 609-49750-425200 51,753.99 Check Sequence: 22 ACH Enabled: True 898.58 06/27/2017 226-45126-440440 898.58 Check Sequence: 23 ACH Enabled: False 2,060.00 06/27/2017 101-42400-421990 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/21/2017 - 2:09 PM) Page 4 Invoice No Description Amount Check Total: Vendor: 1833 DAN & JERRY'S GREENHOUSEES INCORP( 357592 (5) 10" planters; (2) l Oct. Proven winners- East I 736.50 Check Total: Vendor: 1153 ECM PUBLISHERS INC 498947 Tax Abatement Hearing Ad# 693393 279.85 Check Total: Vendor: 1166 ESRI 93299910 9/1/17 - 8/31/18 ArcGIS Desktop/Server Workgr 242.38 Check Total: Vendor: 1170 FASTENAL COMPANY MNMON102124 (30) 40# Floor Dry Clay MNMON102272 picnic table hardware MNMON102314 picnic table hardware 06/27/2017 Check Total: Vendor: 2561 FERGUSON WATERWORKS #2516 0242573 Neptune Repair 0242815 T10 Meter 0242822 LF Meter Flg. Kit; (2) Coup. w/ wire 0243049 LF 2 Meter Flg. Kit Check Total: Vendor: 2273 FIBERNET MONTICELLO - ACH 6/8/2017 City Hall Phone - June 2017 6/8/2017 MCC Phone - June 2017 6/8/2017 Ballfrelds Phone - June 2017 6/8/2017 DMV Phone - June 2017 6/8/2017 Hi Way Liquor Phone - June 2017 6/8/2017 Fire Hall Phone - June 2017 6/8/2017 Public Works Phone - June 2017 6/8/2017 Parks Phone - June 2017 6/8/2017 Prairie Center Phone - June 2017 6/8/2017 Sheriff Phone - June 2017 Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 06/27/2017 2,060.00 736.50 06/27/2017 702-00000-432100 19.43 06/27/2017 702-00000-432100 279.85 06/27/2017 Check Sequence: 24 ACH Enabled: False 174.75 242.38 06/27/2017 101-45201-440900 290.93 06/27/2017 174.75 113.73 06/27/2017 702-00000-432100 14.16 06/27/2017 702-00000-432100 69.73 06/27/2017 Check Sequence: 25 ACH Enabled: True 1,052.22 06/27/2017 101-41310-435100 1,052.22 Check Sequence: 26 ACH Enabled: False 2,200.00 06/27/2017 101-43111-430910 2,200.00 Check Sequence: 27 ACH Enabled: False 204.00 06/27/2017 101-42200-421990 34.05 06/27/2017 101-45201-421650 43.54 06/27/2017 101-45201-421650 281.59 Check Sequence: 28 ACH Enabled: False 370.00 06/27/2017 601-49440-422100 255.15 06/27/2017 601-49440-422710 188.28 06/27/2017 601-49440-422710 146.53 06/27/2017 601-49440-422710 il11%Ti AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/21/2017 - 2:09 PM) Page 5 Check Sequence: 29 ACH Enabled: True 685.84 06/27/2017 702-00000-432100 736.50 06/27/2017 702-00000-432100 19.43 06/27/2017 702-00000-432100 279.85 06/27/2017 702-00000-432100 286.63 06/27/2017 702-00000-432100 242.38 06/27/2017 702-00000-432100 290.93 06/27/2017 702-00000-432100 113.73 06/27/2017 702-00000-432100 14.16 06/27/2017 702-00000-432100 69.73 06/27/2017 702-00000-432100 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/21/2017 - 2:09 PM) Page 5 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 6/8/2017 City Hall Internet - June 2017 124.95 06/27/2017 702-00000-432300 6/8/2017 MCC Internet - June 2017 10.00 06/27/2017 702-00000-432300 6/8/2017 Ballfields Internet - June 2017 10.00 06/27/2017 702-00000-432300 6/8/2017 DMV Internet - June 2017 41.95 06/27/2017 702-00000-432300 6/8/2017 Hi Way Liquor Internet - June 2017 41.95 06/27/2017 702-00000-432300 6/8/2017 Fire Hall Internet - June 2017 41.95 06/27/2017 702-00000-432300 6/8/2017 Animal Shelter Internet - June 2017 29.95 06/27/2017 702-00000-432300 6/8/2017 Public Works Internet - June 2017 69.95 06/27/2017 702-00000-432300 6/8/2017 Sheriff Internet - June 2017 41.95 06/27/2017 702-00000-432300 6/8/2017 City Hall Cable - June 2017 12.95 06/27/2017 101-41310-431990 6/8/2017 MCC Cable - June 2017 319.39 06/27/2017 226-45127-432500 6/8/2017 City Hall Data Hosting - June 2017 500.00 06/27/2017 702-00000-431900 6/8/2017 City Hall Service Contract - June 2017 250.00 06/27/2017 702-00000-431900 Check Total: 4,234.17 Vendor: 4391 WIL GOETSCH Check Sequence: 30 ACH Enabled: True 6/14/2017 Referee Mens Hockey - 5/10 & 5/14 Adjustment 40.00 06/27/2017 226-45127-431990 Check Total: 40.00 Vendor: 4720 JIM HACKENDORF Check Sequence: 31 ACH Enabled: False 6/13/17 Escrow Refund - 8273 Gatewater/Carisle 2,000.00 06/27/2017 101-00000-220110 Check Total: 2,000.00 Vendor: 4218 HOHENSTEINS, INC Check Sequence: 32 ACH Enabled: False 899006 resale - beer 1,162.50 06/27/2017 609-49750-425200 Check Total: 1,162.50 Vendor: 1242 HOLIDAY CREDIT OFFICE Check Sequence: 33 ACH Enabled: True 06182017 acct. 1400-017-223-399 fule slips 5/18-6/11/17 439.64 06/27/2017 101-42200-421200 Check Total: 439.64 Vendor: 1253 J H LARSON COMPANY Check Sequence: 34 ACH Enabled: False S101503856.001 250 W Lamps (24) 170.64 06/27/2017 226-45126-421990 Check Total: 170.64 Vendor: 3369 JAKE'S EXCAVATING INC Check Sequence: 35 ACH Enabled: True 3137 Simpson- 5/8/17 400.00 06/27/2017 651-49010-431150 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/21/2017 - 2:09 PM) Page 6 Invoice No Description Vendor: 1260 Check Total: Vendor: 1259 JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING 2669168 resale - beer 2689653 resale - beer 2689653 resale - beer n/a 2689653 freight 2689680 resale - beer 5742576 Check Total: Vendor: 1260 JME OF MONTICELLO INC SYS42189 Parts- Engine 4- suspension & frame- replace ste SYS42189 Labor Engine 4- suspension & frame- replace ste Check Total: Vendor: 1263 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 5742575 resale - liquor 5742575 freight 5742576 freight 5742576 resale - mix 5742576 resale - wine 5742577 resale - beer 5745304 resale - liquor 5745304 freight 5745305 freight 5745305 resale - mix 5745305 resale - wine 5745306 resale - beer 5746753 freight 5746753 resale - liquor 5746754 resale - wine 5746754 resale - mix 5746754 freight 5746755 resale- beer 5748173 resale- liquor 5748173 freight 5748174 freight 5748174 resale - wine 5748174 resale - wine n/a 5750906 freight Amount Payment Date Acct Number 400.00 Check Sequence: 36 129.00 06/27/2017 609-49750-425200 2,969.90 06/27/2017 609-49750-425200 105.50 06/27/2017 609-49750-425400 3.00 06/27/2017 609-49750-433300 3,347.50 06/27/2017 609-49750-425200 6,554.90 Check Sequence: 37 2,913.05 06/27/2017 101-42200-440500 805.00 06/27/2017 101-42200-440500 3,718.05 Check Sequence: 38 1,059.59 06/27/2017 609-49750-425100 14.16 06/27/2017 609-49750-433300 28.80 06/27/2017 609-49750-433300 129.34 06/27/2017 609-49750-425400 799.50 06/27/2017 609-49750-425300 73.80 06/27/2017 609-49750-425200 6,359.41 06/27/2017 609-49750-425100 80.64 06/27/2017 609-49750-433300 27.36 06/27/2017 609-49750-433300 35.00 06/27/2017 609-49750-425400 752.80 06/27/2017 609-49750-425300 73.80 06/27/2017 609-49750-425200 98.51 06/27/2017 609-49750-433300 6,906.45 06/27/2017 609-49750-425100 1,627.10 06/27/2017 609-49750-425300 114.70 06/27/2017 609-49750-425400 54.72 06/27/2017 609-49750-433300 87.96 06/27/2017 609-49750-425200 1,484.62 06/27/2017 609-49750-425100 19.08 06/27/2017 609-49750-433300 39.02 06/27/2017 609-49750-433300 1,580.25 06/27/2017 609-49750-425300 28.85 06/27/2017 609-49750-425400 18.96 06/27/2017 609-49750-433300 Reference ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: False AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/21/2017 - 2:09 PM) Page 7 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 5750906 resale - liquor 2,336.63 06/27/2017 609-49750-425100 5750907 resale - wine 625.25 06/27/2017 609-49750-425300 5750907 freight 18.72 06/27/2017 609-49750-433300 628270 resale - liquor credit inv. #5718525 -7.81 06/27/2017 609-49750-425100 629657 resale - liquor credit inv. #5737410 -224.00 06/27/2017 609-49750-425100 629657 freight credit inv. #5737410 -1.44 06/27/2017 609-49750-433300 629934 freight credit inv. # 5741290 -1.44 06/27/2017 609-49750-433300 629934 resale liquor credit inv. # 5741290 -98.00 06/27/2017 609-49750-425100 630685 resale - beer credit inv. #5742577 -24.60 06/27/2017 609-49750-425200 Check Total: 24,117.73 Vendor: 4722 LILIA LANTTO Check Sequence: 39 ACH Enabled: True 6/8/2017 Mileage Reimb - Life Guard Training in Becker 28.25 06/27/2017 226-45122-433100 Check Total: 28.25 Vendor: 4717 EUGENE LARKIN Check Sequence: 40 ACH Enabled: False Rvrfst 2017 -1 July 15 Riverfest appearance 1,250.00 06/27/2017 609-49754-425550 Check Total: 1,250.00 Vendor: 2304 LEGACY MECHANICAL SERVICES LLC Check Sequence: 41 ACH Enabled: True 154 Test RPZ in Boiler Room & Pool Room 450.00 06/27/2017 226-45126-431990 Check Total: 450.00 Vendor: 4718 SCOTT LEIUS Check Sequence: 42 ACH Enabled: False Rvrfst 2017 July 15 Riverfest appearance 1,250.00 06/27/2017 609-49754-425550 Check Total: 1,250.00 Vendor: 3550 RACHEL LEONARD Check Sequence: 43 ACH Enabled: True 6/8/2017 Mileage to Annual REP/DEOC/P10 Training - S 51.90 06/27/2017 101-41310-433100 Check Total: 51.90 Vendor: 4456 LUPULIN BREWING LLC Check Sequence: 44 ACH Enabled: False 1638 resale - beer 346.50 06/27/2017 609-49750-425200 1707 resale - beer 540.00 06/27/2017 609-49750-425200 Check Total: 886.50 Vendor: 1300 DOUGLAS WILLIAM LYSENG Check Sequence: 45 ACH Enabled: True 1361 Renewals: Antivirus Software (101 licenses), So 3,391.88 06/27/2017 702-00000-424100 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/21/2017 - 2:09 PM) Page 8 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number 3,391.88 Reference Check Total: Vendor: 3896 M & M CARPET & UPHOLSTERY CLEANIN 1326 06/27/2017 Office Furniture Cleaning Check Total: Vendor: 1303 M AMUNDSON CIGAR & CANDY CO, LLP 239378 resale - cigarettes; juice 239378 resale - tobacco; can coolers; cups; etc ACH Enabled: Check Total: Vendor: 2819 MADDEN GALANTER HANSEN LLP May 2017 Labor Relations Services - May 2017 299.37 06/27/2017 Check Total: Vendor: 4721 MAMAC SYSTEMS 442142 Duct Temperature Sensor (2) Check Total: Vendor: 3745 MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 20315417 Enabled: (685) gal 1 gas @$2.30 20315419 06/27/2017 (927) gal diesel gas @$2.03 20330525 (623) gal 1 gas @$1.84 424888 (915) gal 1 gas @$1.94 Check Total: Vendor: 1308 MARCOINC 332952423 Enabled: 6/10/17 - 7/10/17 Contract Payment 40.75 06/27/2017 Check Total: Vendor: 1914 MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS 20501741 (24.01) TN Rip Rap - Storm Water Mntc. Check Total: Vendor: 1314 MCDOWALL COMPANY 234978 Enabled: Annual HVAC Maint Agreement Contract #C05 - 234979 06/27/2017 Annual HVAC Maint Agreement Contract #C05 - Amount Payment Date Acct Number 3,391.88 Reference AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/21/2017 - 2:09 PM) Page 9 Check Sequence: 46 ACH Enabled: False 272.00 06/27/2017 101-41310-431990 272.00 Check Sequence: 47 ACH Enabled: True 998.38 06/27/2017 609-49750-425500 299.37 06/27/2017 609-49750-425400 1,297.75 Check Sequence: 48 ACH Enabled: False 71.50 06/27/2017 101-41800-430400 71.50 Check Sequence: 49 ACH Enabled: False 40.75 06/27/2017 226-45126-440440 40.75 Check Sequence: 50 ACH Enabled: True 1,575.17 06/27/2017 101-43120-421200 1,879.53 06/27/2017 101-43120-421200 1,148.27 06/27/2017 101-43120-421200 1,772.94 06/27/2017 101-43120-421200 6,375.91 Check Sequence: 51 ACH Enabled: True 2,736.72 06/27/2017 702-00000-441500 2,736.72 Check Sequence: 52 ACH Enabled: False 597.85 06/27/2017 101-43130-421990 597.85 Check Sequence: 53 ACH Enabled: False 332.00 06/27/2017 101-45501-431900 170.00 06/27/2017 101-41941-431900 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/21/2017 - 2:09 PM) Page 9 Invoice No Description 234980 Annual HVAC Maint Agreement Contract #C05.' Amount Check Total: Vendor: 2512 MONTICELLO PLBG HTG AC LLC 16837 (400) lb solar salt @ .175/lb. 16863 Replaced Condensor, Filter; Test Refrigerant 226-45126-431900 Check Total: Vendor: 1373 MONTICELLO SCHOOL DISTRICT #882 6/8/2017 Refund: Overcharge for Water Access 6/8/2017 Refund: Under Charge for Water Meter 6/8/2017 Refund: Under Charge for Water Meter Tax 6/8/2017 Refund: Under Charge for Shipping on Water M Check Total: Vendor: 1377 MONTICELLO SENIOR CENTER June 2017 Monthly Allocation - June 2017 70.00 Check Total: Vendor: 1379 MONTICELLO UMPIRE ASSOCIATION MCC Softball Umpire Monday & Tuesday Softball Leagues - Check Total: Vendor: 1390 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 1121282 Shaft PTO; shaft pivot; (2) bearing; (4) bushing - 1121706 Repl. Brom; set (38) Spring Tine replacement 2,004.50 Check Total: Vendor: 4390 MICHAEL MUELLER 6/20/2017 Referee Mens Hockey - 5/14 Game Check Total: Vendor: 2518 NEOFUNDS BYNEOPOST 06/03/2017 Postage 06/03/2017 Postage Purchased 5/22/17 06/03/2017 Postage for Pkgs to Dept Public Safety - May 20 Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 466.00 06/27/2017 226-45126-431900 968.00 Check Sequence: 54 ACH Enabled: False 70.00 06/27/2017 101-42200-421990 1,934.50 06/27/2017 226-45126-431990 2,004.50 Check Sequence: 55 ACH Enabled: False 2,781.00 06/27/2017 265-43190-341100 -1,458.24 06/27/2017 265-43190-341100 -100.25 06/27/2017 601-00000-208100 -40.00 06/27/2017 601-00000-362900 1,182.51 Check Sequence: 56 ACH Enabled: True 4,880.00 06/27/2017 101-45175-444310 4,880.00 Check Sequence: 57 ACH Enabled: True 1,904.00 06/27/2017 226-45127-431990 1,904.00 Check Sequence: 58 ACH Enabled: False 711.36 06/27/2017 101-45201-422100 391.81 06/27/2017 101-45201-422100 1,103.17 Check Sequence: 59 ACH Enabled: False 40.00 06/27/2017 226-45127-431990 40.00 Check Sequence: 60 ACH Enabled: False 39.00 06/27/2017 101-41310-443990 1,000.00 06/27/2017 101-00000-155010 164.07 06/27/2017 217-41990-432200 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/21/2017 - 2:09 PM) Page 10 Invoice No Description Check Total: Vendor: 4368 OFFICE DEPOT INC 933659848001 (2) 250pkpaper 933659924001 Post -it notes 933659924002 Post -it notes- backorder received Amount Payment Date Acct Number 1,203.07 Check Total: Vendor: 1411 OLSON & SONS ELECTRIC INC 18210 06/27/2017 400W Lamps (4) 10.44 06/27/2017 Check Total: Vendor: 1412 OMANN BROTHERS INC 12709 (10.03) SPWEA240A Check Total: Vendor: 1951 PAPCOINC 103496 Repair Auto Scrubber - Battery Cable, Cable Enc Check Total: Vendor: 1273 PAUSTIS & SONS WINE CO 8592812 resale - wine 8592812 freight 233.06 06/27/2017 Check Total: Vendor: 1427 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS CO 2178136 freight 2178136 06/27/2017 resale - liquor 2178137 06/27/2017 resale - wine 2178137 freight 2180009 resale - liquor 2180009 06/27/2017 freight 2180894 06/27/2017 freight 2180894 06/27/2017 resale - liquor 2180895 06/27/2017 resale - wine 2180895 06/27/2017 resale - mix 2180895 06/27/2017 freight 2181869 06/27/2017 freight Amount Payment Date Acct Number 1,203.07 Check Sequence: 61 30.38 06/27/2017 101-43110-421990 10.44 06/27/2017 101-43110-421990 10.44 06/27/2017 101-43110-421990 51.26 Check Sequence: 62 97.76 06/27/2017 226-45126-421990 97.76 Check Sequence: 63 469.00 06/27/2017 101-43120-422400 469.00 Check Sequence: 64 233.06 06/27/2017 226-45126-431990 233.06 Check Sequence: 65 713.74 06/27/2017 609-49750-425300 10.50 06/27/2017 609-49750-433300 724.24 Check Sequence: 66 12.96 06/27/2017 609-49750-433300 910.10 06/27/2017 609-49750-425100 1,123.40 06/27/2017 609-49750-425300 31.68 06/27/2017 609-49750-433300 1,033.09 06/27/2017 609-49750-425100 10.22 06/27/2017 609-49750-433300 17.31 06/27/2017 609-49750-433300 1,970.45 06/27/2017 609-49750-425100 1,157.33 06/27/2017 609-49750-425300 64.00 06/27/2017 609-49750-425400 35.28 06/27/2017 609-49750-433300 10.08 06/27/2017 609-49750-433300 Reference ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/21/2017 - 2:09 PM) Page 11 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 2181869 resale - wine 307.35 06/27/2017 609-49750-425300 2181869 resale - liquor 34.50 06/27/2017 609-49750-425100 2183715 freight 28.92 06/27/2017 609-49750-433300 2183715 resale - liquor 2,156.78 06/27/2017 609-49750-425100 266606 resale - mix credit inv #2178137 -58.80 06/27/2017 609-49750-425400 266606 freight credit inv # 2178137 -1.44 06/27/2017 609-49750-433300 Check Total: 8,843.21 Vendor: 4022 REINHART FOODSERVICE LLC Check Sequence: 67 ACH Enabled: False 808465 Food for Concession Resale 463.43 06/27/2017 226-45125-425410 808465 Freight 7.99 06/27/2017 226-45122-433300 Check Total: 471.42 Vendor: 1474 PATRICIAA SALZWEDEL Check Sequence: 68 ACH Enabled: True June 2nd Semi Monthly Contract Payment 1,593.75 06/27/2017 101-42700-431200 Check Total: 1,593.75 Vendor: 4716 SAVE A LIFE CORPORATION Check Sequence: 69 ACH Enabled: True 4419 First Responder Crs- M. Coopman 595.00 06/27/2017 101-42200-433100 Check Total: 595.00 Vendor: 4719 SCHMITZ EXCAVATING Check Sequence: 70 ACH Enabled: False 1276 312 Excavator remove roof -charged to ins. of he 500.00 06/27/2017 101-42200-431990 Check Total: 500.00 Vendor: 4627 SCOTT COUNTY Check Sequence: 71 ACH Enabled: False IN20109 2017 MN Public Broadband Alliance Membersh 1,500.00 06/27/2017 656-49870-431990 Check Total: 1,500.00 Vendor: 2443 SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA INC Check Sequence: 72 ACH Enabled: False W5679437 6/3/17 - Wedding Security 140.00 06/27/2017 226-45123-431992 Check Total: 140.00 Vendor: 1490 CYNTHIA R SIMPSON Check Sequence: 73 ACH Enabled: False 965208 June 2017 Cleaning - Fire Hall 100.00 06/27/2017 101-42200-431990 Check Total: 100.00 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/21/2017 - 2:09 PM) Page 12 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Vendor: 3309 SOUTHERN GLAZER'S WINE AND SPIRITS, Check Sequence: 74 ACH Enabled: False 1553031 resale - liquor 1,708.63 06/27/2017 609-49750-425100 1553031 freight 18.55 06/27/2017 609-49750-433300 1553032 freight 10.50 06/27/2017 609-49750-433300 1553032 resale- wine 691.56 06/27/2017 609-49750-425300 1555865 resale - wine 400.00 06/27/2017 609-49750-425300 1555865 freight 14.00 06/27/2017 609-49750-433300 1555866 freight 21.70 06/27/2017 609-49750-433300 1555866 resale - liquor 2,250.90 06/27/2017 609-49750-425100 1555867 resale - wine 882.58 06/27/2017 609-49750-425300 1555867 freight 15.40 06/27/2017 609-49750-433300 Check Total: 6,013.82 Vendor: 4672 SPECIALTY SOLUTIONS LLC Check Sequence: 75 ACH Enabled: False 146760 (80) 50 lb. Fertilizer BCOL 1,396.00 06/27/2017 101-45201-421650 Check Total: 1,396.00 Vendor: 3594 STRATEGIC EQUIPMENT, LLC Check Sequence: 76 ACH Enabled: False 2885452 asst. bags; cs. coffee 274.76 06/27/2017 609-49754-421990 Check Total: 274.76 Vendor: 1518 TDS TELECOM Check Sequence: 77 ACH Enabled: True 763-271-3257 TDS 90.66 06/27/2017 702-00000-432100 763-295-2005 TDS 18.09 06/27/2017 702-00000-432100 763-295-3714 TDS 330.52 06/27/2017 702-00000-432100 Check Total: 439.27 Vendor: 1519 THEIN WELL CO Check Sequence: 78 ACH Enabled: False 8695 Sealed (7) monitor wells on old WWTP sludge s 1,800.00 06/27/2017 602-49490-431990 Check Total: 1,800.00 Vendor: 1537 UHL COMPANY INC Check Sequence: 79 ACH Enabled: True 51815 Control System Service Call WO #B70524009 318.00 06/27/2017 226-45126-431990 Check Total: 318.00 Vendor: 1544 US POSTAL SERVICE Check Sequence: 80 ACH Enabled: False 6/9/2017 PI 42 - UB May Billing (3,773 pcs) (1/2) 854.59 06/27/2017 601-49440-432200 6/9/2017 PI 42 - UB May Billing (3,773 pcs) (1/2) 854.58 06/27/2017 602-49490-432200 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/21/2017 - 2:09 PM) Page 13 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Check Total: 1,709.17 Vendor: 4715 UTILITY CONSULTANTS, INC. Check Sequence: 81 ACH Enabled: False 95066 (20) Phosphorus - Sample date: 5/10/17 100.00 06/27/2017 601-49440-422740 Check Total: 100.00 Vendor: 1552 VIKING COCA COLA BOTTLING CO Check Sequence: 82 ACH Enabled: True 1963160 resale - soda pop 370.50 06/27/2017 609-49750-425400 Check Total: 370.50 Vendor: 1684 VINOCOPIA Check Sequence: 83 ACH Enabled: True 0182419 resale - wine 80.00 06/27/2017 609-49750-425300 0182419 freight 2.50 06/27/2017 609-49750-433300 0182425 freight 10.00 06/27/2017 609-49750-433300 0182425 resale- liquor 360.00 06/27/2017 609-49750-425100 Check Total: 452.50 Vendor: 1561 WATER LABORATORIES INC Check Sequence: 84 ACH Enabled: False 6221 May 2017 Water Testing 240.00 06/27/2017 601-49440-422740 Check Total: 240.00 Vendor: 1567 WES OLSON ELECTRIC LLC Check Sequence: 85 ACH Enabled: False 8280 ZPARKS-ELLPRK- Parts- (4) breaker; (12) coni 183.41 06/27/2017 229-45202-453010 8280 ZPARKS-ELLPRK- Labor- Engzd Panel; remv c 456.00 06/27/2017 229-45202-453010 Check Total: 639.41 Vendor: 1572 THE WINE COMPANY Check Sequence: 86 ACH Enabled: True 39559 resale - wine 488.00 06/27/2017 609-49750-425300 39559 frieght 8.25 06/27/2017 609-49750-433300 Check Total: 496.25 Vendor: 1573 WINE MERCHANTS INC Check Sequence: 87 ACH Enabled: False 7134368 resale - wine 1,720.00 06/27/2017 609-49750-425300 7134368 freight 23.76 06/27/2017 609-49750-433300 7137213 resale - wine 285.00 06/27/2017 609-49750-425300 7137213 freight 4.32 06/27/2017 609-49750-433300 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/21/2017 - 2:09 PM) Page 14 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number 2,033.08 Check Total: Vendor: 1206 WINEBOW INC. MN00022384 resale - liquor MN00022384 freight Vendor: 1581 Check Total: Vendor: 2645 WRIGHT CO AUDITOR-TREAS 1 Re Issue - 2017 Asssessment Fees Amount Payment Date Acct Number 2,033.08 Check Total: Vendor: 1577 WRIGHT CO AUDITOR-TREAS - ACH 6/13/2017 Court Fines & Fees for May 2017 01494-700 45 Check Total: Vendor: 1581 WRIGHT CO RECORDER 201700000047 Approval #A 1344009 201700000047 201706 -Amendment Misc #A 1344010 Amount Payment Date Acct Number 2,033.08 Check Total: Vendor: 1584 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 01160-38158 Standard Specification & Design Guidelines - A 01494-700 45 General W WTP - April 2017 01494-780 24 MS4/SWPPP Services - April 2017 01494-800 40 100009 - CSAH 75/TH 25 Intersection Improvei 01494-950 32 14C002 - Phosphorus Construction Phase 4 - Al 01627-680 15 16D002 - Mills Fleet Faun Plan Review - April 02596-010 28 2017 General Engineering Services Phase 5 - Al 02596-010 28 2017 General Engineering Services Phase 5 - Al 02596-010 28 2017 General Engineering Services Phase 5 - Al 02596-020 11 State Aid Network - April 2017 02596-030 19 Maps -April 2017 02596-100 23 15C001 - 2016 Street Reconstruction Project - A 02596-160 16 15C004 - 7th Street/TH25 Intersection Improve 1 02596-2208 201710 - Monti Middle School Expansion Phase 02596-2904 Monticello Business Center Drainage Study - A 02596-3202 Rolling Woods Park Sidewalk Extension - April 02596-3304 16D004 - Wamert/Sherburne Bank Plan Review 02596-3407 2016 - 2017 Market Matching - April 2017 Amount Payment Date Acct Number 2,033.08 Check Sequence: 88 204.00 06/27/2017 609-49750-425100 2.25 06/27/2017 609-49750-433300 206.25 Check Sequence: 89 1,144.20 06/13/2017 101-41550-431250 1,144.20 Check Sequence: 90 2,036.91 06/27/2017 101-42100-430410 2,036.91 Check Sequence: 91 46.00 06/27/2017 101-41910-431990 46.00 06/27/2017 101-41910-431990 92.00 Check Sequence: 92 452.00 06/27/2017 101-43111-430300 2,307.00 06/27/2017 602-49480-430300 192.00 06/27/2017 101-43111-430300 1,872.00 06/27/2017 400-43300-430300 3,991.75 06/27/2017 602-00000-165010 330.00 06/27/2017 101-00000-220110 2,660.00 06/27/2017 101-43111-430300 2,660.00 06/27/2017 601-49440-430300 2,660.00 06/27/2017 602-49490-430300 163.50 06/27/2017 101-43111-430300 814.00 06/27/2017 101-43111-430300 5,994.50 06/27/2017 400-43300-459011 39,533.75 06/27/2017 400-43300-459014 76.00 06/27/2017 101-00000-220110 4,156.50 06/27/2017 263-49200-431990 1,152.50 06/27/2017 229-45202-453910 1,207.00 06/27/2017 101-00000-220110 2,608.00 06/27/2017 213-46301-431990 Reference ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: True AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/21/2017 - 2:09 PM) Page 15 Invoice No Description 02596-3505 17D001 - Camping World Plan Review - April, 02596-3607 16CO03 - 2017 Street Improvements - April 201 02596-4004 16CO06 - Fallon Ave Improvements - April 201' 02596-4202 201710 - Spaeth Plan Review - April 2017 47,169.50 Check Total: Total for Check Run: Total of Number of Checks: Amount Payment Date Acct Number 407.00 06/27/2017 101-00000-220110 41,877.75 06/27/2017 400-43300-459016 47,169.50 06/27/2017 400-43300-459018 76.00 06/27/2017 101-00000-220110 162,360.75 423,723.39 92 The preceding list of bills payables was reviewed and approved for payment. Date: 6/26/17 Approved by: Mayor Brian Stumpf Reference AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/21/2017 - 2:09 PM) Page 16 City Council Agenda 6/26/17 2B. Consideration of approving new hires and departures for Citv departments (TE) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The Council is asked to ratify the hiring and departures of employees that have occurred recently in the departments listed. It is recommended that the Council officially ratify the hiring/departure of all listed employees including part-time and seasonal workers. By ratifying departures, the council also approves the expenditure for final amounts due to terminated and otherwise departing employees. Al. Budget Impact: (positions are generally included in budget) A2. Staff Work Load Impact: If new positions, there may be some training involved. If terminated positions, existing staff would pick up those hours, as needed, until replaced. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to ratify the hire/departures of the employees as identified on the attached list. 2. Motion to deny the recommended hires and departures. C. RECOMMENDATION: By statute the City Council has the authority to approve all hires/departures. City staff recommends Alternative #1, for the Council to approve the hires and/or departures as listed. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • List of new/terminated employees NEW EMPLOYEES Name Title Department Hire Date Class Kirsten Olson Guest Service MCC 6/12/2017 PT Nicholas Lostetter Climbing Wall MCC 6/12/2017 PT Nathan Hoglund Parks Worker Parks 6/12/2017 Seasonal Charlie Voller Parks Worker Parks 6/22/2017 Seasonal TERMINATING EMPLOYEES Name Reason Department Last Day Class Danielle Kinler Involuntary MCC 6/19/17 PT Marina Livarchuk Involuntary MCC 6/19/17 PT New Hire and Terms City Council 2017: 6/21/2017 City Council Agenda 06/26/2017 2C. Consideration of approving the sale or disposal of surplus Citv property (WO) There is no report this City Council cycle. City Council Agenda: 06/26/17 2D. Consideration of shifting to paperless agendas beginning the first Citv Council meeting in Julv 2017 (JS) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: On Feb 13, 2017, City Council directed staff to research the City Council shifting to paperless agenda packets. After some research, staff agreed that the Microsoft Surface Pros would be the designated device for use. Five Surface Pros were purchase for City Council and one for City Staff. This device will be a take-home device. The Surface Pros allow for a pdf version of the Council agenda to be downloaded onto the device for Councilmembers to read, make notations, and organize packet information. The proposed model includes Wi-Fi networking, which allows connection to the Internet and checking e-mail if you have a wireless router at home or are otherwise using the device near a wireless hotspot. Staff is proposing to cease the printing of agenda packets for City Council members beginning July 10. Al. Budget Impact: The cost of the devices, covers, & pens totaled approximately $5,422. A2. Staff Workload Impact: There was some staff time in researching and reviewing the devices. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the transition to a paperless agenda beginning at the City Council meeting on July 10, 2017. 2. Motion to deny. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends Alternative #1. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • None. City Council Agenda: 06/26/17 2E. Consideration of approving an application for temporary on -sale liquor license for the Monticello Lions Club for their Brewfest event on August 19, 2017 (JS) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The Monticello Lions Club is requesting approval of an application for a 1 -day temporary on -sale liquor license on August 19, 2017 for their annual Brewfest event. The Lions Club will be setting up the event in West Bridge Park, located at 107 West River Street. The Lions Club has provided a certificate of insurance for this event and will be submitting an application for a special event permit for use of West Bridge Park in the coming months. City Council is required to approve temporary liquor applications prior to sending them to the State Alcohol and Gambling Division for approval. Al. Budget Impact: None A2. Staff Workload Impact: Minimal staff time to send application to State Alcohol and Gambling Division for approval. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the application for a temporary liquor license for the Monticello Lions Brewfest event on August 19, 2017 at West Bridge Park. 2. Do not approve the application for a temporary liquor license. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends Alternative #1 for approval of the application. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Application for temporary liquor license B. Certificate of Liability Insurance MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY o � I Minnesota Department of Public Safety Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division 445 Minnesota Street, Suite 222, St. Paul, MN 55101 651-201-7500 Fax 651-297-5259 TTY 651-282-6555 APPLICATION AND PERMIT FOR A 1 DAY TO 4 DAY TEMPORARY ON -SALE LIQUOR LICENSE Name of organization 44 im Address -i)G �bx ti Name of person making application V�\ICkd) )� Cy/' Date(s) of event Icy, c.s� r 9, eW 7 Organization officer's name �l p (k�oX/ Organization officer's name I Organization officer's name I Organization officer's name I Location where permit will be used. If an outdoor area, describe. Es.rl�iye , /07 wpm�'�P� f�PP7`, �'L�6JjCe If the applicant will contract for intoxicating liquor service give the name and address of the liquor license providing the service. If the applicant will carry liquor liability insurance please provide the carrier's name and amount of coverage. APPROVAL APPLICATION MUST BE APPROVED BY CITY OR COUNTY BEFORE SUBMITTING TO ALCOHOL AND GAMBLING ENFORCEMENT City or County approving the license Fee Amount P/ -70/7 Date Fee Paid Date Approved Permit Date City or County E-mail Address City or County Phone Number Signature City Clerk or County Official Approved Director Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement CLERKS NOTICE: Submit this form to Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division 30 days prior to event. ONE SUBMISSION PER EMAIL, APPLICATION ONLY. PLEASE PROVIDE A VALID E-MAIL ADDRESS FOR THE CITY/COUNTY AS ALL TEMPORARY PERMIT APPROVALS WILL BE SENT BACK VIA EMAIL. E-MAIL THE APPLICATION SIGNED BY CITY/COUNTY TO AGE.TEMPORARYAPPLICATION@STATE.MN.US Date organized OAS q V1 197 Tax exempt number I I Q- K02 City State Zip Code �/ f .N Y-i'C_r IMN 11- Business phone Home phone - -�I 61z , --? 6�� II�rz 6�a7�7 Type of organization E] Club ❑ Charitable ❑ Religious Other non-profit State Zip Code `City IMN c, I I City J State Zip Code I I IMN I State Zip Code ( {City J I I IMN I City State Zip Code 1 1 I IMN I I Location where permit will be used. If an outdoor area, describe. Es.rl�iye , /07 wpm�'�P� f�PP7`, �'L�6JjCe If the applicant will contract for intoxicating liquor service give the name and address of the liquor license providing the service. If the applicant will carry liquor liability insurance please provide the carrier's name and amount of coverage. APPROVAL APPLICATION MUST BE APPROVED BY CITY OR COUNTY BEFORE SUBMITTING TO ALCOHOL AND GAMBLING ENFORCEMENT City or County approving the license Fee Amount P/ -70/7 Date Fee Paid Date Approved Permit Date City or County E-mail Address City or County Phone Number Signature City Clerk or County Official Approved Director Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement CLERKS NOTICE: Submit this form to Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division 30 days prior to event. ONE SUBMISSION PER EMAIL, APPLICATION ONLY. PLEASE PROVIDE A VALID E-MAIL ADDRESS FOR THE CITY/COUNTY AS ALL TEMPORARY PERMIT APPROVALS WILL BE SENT BACK VIA EMAIL. E-MAIL THE APPLICATION SIGNED BY CITY/COUNTY TO AGE.TEMPORARYAPPLICATION@STATE.MN.US 1 a I DATE (MM/DD/YYYY) A`� o CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE 6/7/2017 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). CONTACT PRODUCER NAME: Lucas Olson Christensen Group Insurance I FAX (952)653-1100 PHONE (952) 653-1000 IANC. No. Extl: IA/C, No): 11100 Bren Road West E-MAIL ADDRESS: lolson@christensengroup.com INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC # Minnetonka MN 55343 INSURERA:West Bend Mutual 15350 INSURED I INSURER B: Monticello Lions Club I INSURERC: PO BOX 673 I INSURER D: INSURER E: Monticello MN 55362 I INSURER F: COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER:17-18 Liab REVISION NUMBER: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. INSR'ADDLSUBR POLICY EFF POLICY EXP I LIMITS ITR TYPE OF INSURANCE (MSD WVn POLICY NUMBER IMM/DD/YYYYI IMM/DD/YYYYI X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY A CLAIMS -MADE ❑X OCCUR A107246 GENT AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: POLICY ❑ PRO ❑ LOC X PRO- JECT OTHER: AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY _ ANY AUTO ALL OWNED SCHEDULED _ AUTOS AUTOS NON -OWNED HIRED AUTOS H AUTOS UMBRELLA LIAB OCCUR EXCESS LIAB HCLAIMS-MADE DED I I RETENTION $ WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY Y / N ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE ❑ N / A OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? (Mandatory in NH) If yes, describe under DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below A LIQUOR LIABILITY I A107247 EACH OCCURRENCE DAMAGE TO RENTED PREMISES (Ea occurrence) 1/1/2017 1/1/2018 I MED EXP (Any one person) PERSONAL & ADV INJURY IGENERAL AGGREGATE PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG $ 1,000,000 $ 100,000 $ EXCLUDED $ 1,000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT $ (Ea accident) BODILY INJURY (Per person) $ BODILY INJURY (Per accident) $ PROPERTY DAMAGE $ (Per accident) $ EACH OCCURRENCE $ (AGGREGATE $ $ PER STATUTE I IEERH E.L. EACH ACCIDENT $ E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE $ E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT $ 1/1/2017 1/1/2018 EACH COMMON CAUSE AGGREGATE $1,000,000 $1,000,000 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS I LOCATIONS I VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached if more space is required) RE: Monticello Lions Brewfest - West Bridge Park Certificate Holder is included as an Additional Insured under the Commercial General Liability and Liquor Liability when required by written contract. CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE City of Monticello THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. 505 Walnut St Monticello, MN 55362 AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE Bruce Christensen/LMO ©1988-2014 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. ACORD 25 (2014/01) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD INS025 (201401) City Council Agenda: 06/26/17 2F. Consideration of approving a Special Event Permit allowing exclusive use of West Bridge Park and related assistance in conjunction with the Brewfest event on August 19, 2017. Applicant: Monticello Lions Club (JS/PW) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The City Council is asked to consider approval of a special event permit for the Brewfest event, a craft beer -tasting fundraiser organized by the Monticello Lions Club. The request has several associated considerations: a) Approval for use of West Bridge Park from 7 a.m. — 10 p.m. (to accommodate set-up and tear -down) b) Approval of the use of city parking lots in the downtown area C) Approval for city staff assistance for preparation and set-up d) Closure of portions of W. River Street and Walnut Street This adult-oriented community event is proposed to occur Saturday, August 19, 2017, from 3 to 7 p.m., and is being promoted and held in cooperation with eligible Minnesota craft brew vendors and local food vendors. Brewfest organizers are expecting 120 brew types at 45 tables, as well as local restaurant vendors, and an attendance of 1500 persons. Brewfest representatives have indicated that the set-up for the park will be very similar to last year's event. As a condition of approval, the Brewfest Committee will be asked to coordinate with the Parks Superintendent and Streets Superintendent on site planning and parking coordination. City staff will begin advertising closing of the park two weeks in advance of the event. The event is proposed to be located in West Bridge Park. Event attendees would access the park from different locations nearby, with restricted points of entry into the event area in the park itself. The Brewfest Committee indicates in the attached application narrative that the event area within the park will be sectioned off with temporary fencing in order to restrict the point of entry to those over 21 years of age, as this event will be limited to only those persons over 21 holding an event ticket. The Lions Club will be responsible for placement of fencing around the park perimeter and for signage at the parking lots, with snow fence and posts provided by the City as is available. The Brewfest event will include a band for background listening. It is not anticipated that this would create any concerns about sound or volume. However, the Lions Club is being asked to provide advance notice of the event to surrounding homes and businesses within a 2 -block radius. The Brewfest Committee is seeking City assistance for providing barricades, cones, picnic tables, and set-up of those items. The Committee will be asked to verify trash and portable restroom services for the event. The Committee has requested use of the park from 7 a.m.— 10 p.m. to accommodate set-up, clean-up and tear -down by Lions Club members. City Council Agenda: 06/26/17 As with the 2016 event, Public Works staff has proposed a plan to block off some streets in the area of West Bridge Park in order to control traffic flow into and out of the park vicinity. Any approval is contingent on coordination with the Streets Department and Wright County Sherriff's Office for final security, traffic control and street closures. A map of the proposed closures and site plan has been prepared by the Street Superintendent and is attached for reference. The Sheriff's Office has reviewed the permit application and has indicated no issues with the proposed permit; the Sheriff's Office noted that the event organizers have in the past hired an off-duty deputy to assist with security. The Monticello Lions Club is required to obtain insurance to cover the event and its activities, including liquor liability coverage, with the City named as second insured. The Lions Club is responsible for verifying that individual food and beverage vendors have the appropriate insurance coverage and state permits. The Lions Club is expected to provide security for the event through the Wright County Sheriff's Department. Al. Budget Impact: None. A2. Staff Workload Impact: The Lions Club is requesting City assistance for delivery and pick-up of barricades, cones, and picnic tables. These will be delivered to the site and picked up during regular staff hours by the Parks Department (estimated 16 hours). The Street Superintendent will also prepare and provide a site plan for barricade and cone placement. The Streets Department will be responsible for placing and removing all street barricades and signage (estimated 12 hours). B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the Special Event Permit allowing temporary use of West Bridge Park for the Monticello Lions Brewfest event from 7 a.m. to 10 p.m. on Saturday, August 19, 2017, including City assistance, use of municipal parking lots, and street closures. The approval is contingent on: a. Continued site plan and parking use coordination with the Street Superintendent and Park Superintendent. b. Appropriate signage and fencing in coordination with the Street and Park Superintendents. C. Continued coordination with the Chief Building Official on any tent permits that may be needed. d. Verification of trash and portable bathroom services for the event. e. Verification of notification of affected local businesses and residents within a 2 -block radius of the Park by permit holder, no later than two weeks prior to event. f. Event coordination with Wright County Sheriff's Office. 2 City Council Agenda: 06/26/17 2. Motion to deny Special Event Permit for Brewfest event on August 19, 2017. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff supports Alternative #1 above. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Application & Narrative — Lions Club B. Certificate of Liability Insurance C. Aerial Image showing proposed street and parking lot closures CITY Ur Monticello Property Address CITY OF MONTICELLO Community Development 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1 Monticello, MN 55362 (763) 295-2711 . info(i ,ci.monticello.mn.us Property Legal Description Property ID Number Owner Name Owner Address Owner Phone Owner Email PROPERTY INFORMATION PROPERTY QWW$ INFORMATION .sos- u,,A: I &- a rWe t- APPUCANT INFORMATION Special Event Permit Application Checklist Applicant Name 04 �f� 0416 i 44 Applicant Address Q ph' Applicant Phone I A,- /0 �,/� /Z 3(tp 0717 Applicant Email 141 / C 1(r le— a , aoAi.\ Name of Event 9,00(1 / Cp to k116 S AIIPW 'fps 2el7 Location/Address of Event I /,{i S rlc�RP N % C(//�S IQrvQr .I�eell Dates & Times of Event -5) 0L � #9 j� ��, 7 p /7 7 AA4 � /d A^ y Complete Application Required The review and consideration of an application submitted shall only occur if such application includes all items that are required in support of the application and is deemed complete by the City Clerk's Office. Application Submission Schedule Application, required information, and payment must be submitted no later than 30 working days prior to desired approval date. Application Information Applicants shall note that in addition to a special event permits, any liquor license or permit, sign permits and building permits for tents may also be required and are not included within the special event permit application and approval. Any requested use of City facilities, City staff resources, City equipment, and/or City property (including rights of way) and/or any requested waiver of application fee or park rental fees requires review and approval by the City Council. In addition, events which occur after 10 PM may requires review and approval by the City Council as related to noise ordinances. Please provide clear information in the application regarding these requests. 07/25/16 APPUCANT APPUCATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS CITY CHECK-IN CHECK A written narrative including: 1. A description of the proposed special event, how it will function on the property, hours and dates of operation, and any other information necessary to fully describe the request; and 2. An explanation of how the proposed special event will meet, each of the review criteria specified by code (on reverse), as well as any additional criteria that may apply for the specific use. 3. Any requested use of City facilities, City staff resources, City equipment and City property (including rights of way) and/or any requested waiver of application fee or park rental fees requires review and approval by the City Council A site plan showing all information necessary to accurately depict how the proposed use will function on the site. Information required on the site plan shall include but not be limited to: 1. The location of all existing and proposed structures; 2. Driveways and parking areas; 3. Proposed storage spaces; 4. Natural features such as woodlands, wetlands, shorelines, etc; 5. Proposed number of parking spaces (if applicable). If deemed necessary by the Community Development Department, a survey may be required to be submitted with the application in addition to a site plan. Certificate of insurance/liability coverage. Electronic copies of all written narratives and plan sets required above. Application fee of $50.00. Special Event Review Process • The City Clerk will review all Temporary Use Permit applications. • Applications determined to conform with the approval criteria outlined in Monticello Zoning Code Section 2.4(L)(4)(a) and listed below shall be approved by the Community Development Department with any conditions deemed necessary. A copy of the approved permit shall be provided to the applicant which includes all conditions and comments. • Applications not conforming with the approval criteria outlined in Section 2.4(L)(4)(a) shall be denied by the Community Development Department. • A notice of denial shall be provided to the applicant which includes all identified reasons for denial. Special Event Temporary Use Permit Approval Criteria Approval of a Temporary Use Permit shall only be granted once the City Clerk has determined the use shall: • Not be detrimental to property or improvements in the surrounding area or to the public health, safety, or general welfare; • Be compatible with the principal uses taking place on the site; • Not have substantial adverse effects or noise impacts on nearby residential neighborhoods; 07/25/16 Special Event Temporary Use Permit Approval Criteria, cont. • Not include permanent alterations to the site; • Not maintain temporary signs associated with the use or structure after the activity ends; • Not violate the applicable conditions of approval that apply to a site or use on the site; • Not interfere with the normal operations of any permanent use located on the property; and • Contain sufficient land area to allow the temporary use, structure, or special event to occur, as well as adequate land to accommodate the parking and traffic movement associated with the temporary use, without disturbing environmentally sensitive lands. • Not create an unreasonable risk of significant: 1. Damage to public or private property, beyond normal wear and tear; 2. Injury to persons; 3. Public or private disturbances or nuisances; 4. Unsafe impediments or distractions to, or congestion of, vehicular or pedestrian travel; 5. Additional and impracticable or unduly burdensome police, fire, trash removal, maintenance, or other public services demands; and 6. Other adverse effects upon the public health, safety, or welfare. The special event shall not be of such a nature, size, or duration that the particular location requested cannot reasonably accommodate the event. The special event shall not conflict with another permitted special event at the same location in a manner that will negatively impact the public health, welfare, or safety. Special Event Temporary Use Permit Conditions of Approval In approving the Temporary Use Permit for the special event, the City Clerk's Office is authorized to impose such conditions upon the issuance of the permit as may be necessary to reduce or minimize any potential adverse impacts upon other property in the area, as long as the condition relates to a situation created or aggravated by the proposed special event. The Community Development Department is authorized, where appropriate, to require: 1. Provision of temporary parking facilities, including vehicular access and egress. 2. Control of nuisance factors, such as but not limited to, the prevention of glare or direct illumination of adjacent properties, noise, vibrations, smoke, dust, dirt, odors, gases, and heat. 3. Regulation of temporary buildings, structures and facilities, including placement, height and size, location of equipment and open spaces, including buffer areas and other yards. 4. Provision of sanitary and medical facilities. 5. Provision of solid waste collection and disposal. 6. Provision of security and safety measures. 7. Use of an alternative location or date for the proposed special event. 8. Modification or elimination of certain proposed activities. 9. Regulation of operating hours and days, including limitation of the duration of the special event to a shorter time period than that requested or specified in this subsection. 10. Submission of a performance guarantee to ensure that any temporary facilities or structures used for such proposed special event will be removed from the site within a reasonable time following the event and that the property will be restored to its former condition. Duration of Permit A temporary use permit for a special event authorized in accordance with this subsection shall be limited to a maximum duration of 14 days per site per calendar year, unless otherwise specifically authorized by the City Clerk. 07/25/16 3 Property Owners Statement I I am the fee title owner of the described property and I agree to this application. I certify that I am in compliance with all ordinance requirements and conditions regarding other City approval that have been previously granted. (Signature) ! ApplkaWs Statement (Date) This application shall be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding the application. I have completed all of the applicable filing requirements and I hereby acknowledge that I have read and fully understand the applicable provisions of the City Ordinances and current policies related to this application and that the documents and information I have submitted are true and correct. (Signature)/%/C%X/IF j� WY APPROVAL (City Clerk Signature) (Community Development Director Signature) Special Event Permit Approval is granted with the following conditions: Internal review checklist (as applicable): Public Works Routing Law Enforcement Notification Building Department Monticello Community Center Room/Park Reservations Post -Approval Routing/Requirements Applicant Public Works Law Enforcement Notification City Clerk Monticello Community Center Room/Park Reservations Liability Insurance Certificate Received Surrounding Property Owner Notification Complete (Date) 7 7-" /�7 (Date) (Date) Approved ❑ I Denied ❑ Admin I Parks I Streets I Director 07/25/16 4 Monticello Lions — PO Box 673 — Monticello, MN 55362 b�0 �yIfRNAT10�a� We Serve 1 June 2017 Staff and Council City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street Monticello, MN 55362 Greetings, As you are likely aware, the Monticello Lion's Club has a long tradition of serving the Monticello community, especially the humanitarian needs of our less fortunate residents, and having fun as we serve. We raise money for programs in a variety of ways and are currently planning an event that we need your help with in order for us to be successful. The event we are planning is the 2017 Monticello Lions Brewfest, a "Craft Beer Tasting Festival". We are expecting 120 plus beer "flavors" from craft brewers to be presented for tasting. We are planning to make it a celebration of not only craft beer from small brewers, but also a festival of music and food from local restaurants. Our participation goal for the2017 Brewfest is 1500 attendees. The date of the festival is August 19, 2017. Consider the mission statement for this event, "To establish and promote a signature craft beer tasting event for the purpose of raising revenue, in order to continue and expand the community service tradition of the Monticello Lions by using the funds raised for humanitarian purposes. The motto of the Monticello Lions and Lions everywhere being, "We Serve". We are hoping to build on the success of the previous years festivals. Our goals are to increase the number of beer vendors, the number of beers to taste, the number of attendees, and the amount of net revenue, and to improve the experience for all in attendance. Judging by the response of all of the stakeholders including brewers, distributors, food vendors, attendees and the Lions, we are well on our way to achieving this goal. Last year the Lions were able to give more than $30,000.00 back to the community as a direct result of the Brewfest festival. Just a few of the beneficiaries of these funds include the Monticello Food Shelf, the Monticello Fire Department, 320 families and individuals that received food baskets last Christmas, and many other programs that serve the community, especially the less fortunate among us. The actual use of West Bridge Park will be to set up to 45 tables, some or all with small pop-up tents over them, for Craft Beer Brewers to display their craft beers for sampling. Festival attendees will be given a two ounce sampling glass to use to sample as many of the craft beers present as they wish to. In addition to the craft beer brewers there will be up to six local restaurants with tables and small tents selling their culinary specialties. We have also retained a band with a comfortable bluesy rock flavor to provide a pleasant musical background for the event. The event will take place rain or shine. We have had great days, weather wise, for the last five year's events, and are hoping for another just like it this year. The tasting hours for this event will be from 3 — 7 PM. By Minnesota statute, a tasting festival can only run for four hours. We are requesting reservation of the park from 7:00 AM to 10:00 PM to accommodate set-up and tear -down / clean-up. At the end of the event Lions members will take down, pack up and remove all materials, structures, trash, etc. from the site. To accomplish the goal of a successful, orderly and peaceful event, we request that the park be closed to all other uses for that day. We intend to place a fence around the perimeter of the space that we will be using. All Brewfest activities will take place within the fence. All persons inside the fence must be 21, must have purchased a Brewfest ticket, and be wearing a wristband that we will issue. This narrative is attached to the permit application. We have had extensive contact with City of Monticello employees that may be affected by this event, and communicated with them so as to set up in a manner that is acceptable to the City of Monticello. Several City of Monticello employees are also members of the Monticello Lions Club. Sincerely, Mike Cyr Monticello Lions Brewfest Committee 612.366.0717 SUB -TOTAL RENTAL FEE Renters Email Address KEY/CLEAN-UP DEPOSIT • $200 $200'DEPOSIT WILL BEREFUNDED AFTER KEYISRETURNED AND/OR FACILITY HAS BEEN INSPECTED TOTAL AMOUNT DUE PAID CASH I CREDIT CARD CHECK# �1T l'� tY'.'all:'1'i'I'1 { la�'.,1'r �I • a1 i1 iA,.a 1'17t �1 x,41.1 11 yI.l 11��' , -1% ! a 4i N �L'-ni�I �_ IA j.a"1l1'a •yJ..N Jl\MoLmSi 1, KaiiW'..4s« I (NAME: �orN 4 6, i C)I ) (ORGANIZATION: ��e.CuS� _ — NON-PROFIT ID: JIADDRESS: _ JCITY: �r� �-(� �� t�� STATE: ZIP: PHONE: (RESERVATION DATE REQUESTED. I L FROM: ANI/PIV TO: Apq/ph1 i I HAVE RECEIVED, READ AND AGREE TO ABIDE BY ALL PARK ORDINANCES, RULES AND REGULATIONS, AS WELL AS ALL CONDITIONS SET FORTH IN THIS PERMIT ANP IN THE PARK RESERVATION POLICY J SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT: C� r /] , i L �^ l7 4'1s� V W DATE: ISSUED BY: / I e6 n DATE: q I/T� / I 7 r IKey 6 garbage bags Copy of reservation confirmation SIGNED BY. DATE Guest Services Associate Renter Signature IKEY ISSUED: Y / N (KEY #: FACILITY INSPECTED BY. IKEY RETURNED: Y/ N GATE: DEPOSIT CHECK RETURNED: Y / N I DATE: PERMIT FAUST BE TURi IED ISI TO CIT`( HALL AT SOS INALNU f STREET, SUITE 1, mot iTICELLO, PAS I CALL 753-297-2711 INITH QUESTIONS RENTAL FEE INCLUDES NIN STATE SALES c� g TAX elMn'¢ W PARKS FAi3L1 f NON <�`\ 4 o` iiii y�'¢3_ RESIDENT RESIDENT ti�P¢ a"ym'¢'ro''y L°`�¢tiDcti`$r�,= rte arca' as�a`' r� i�IMENNITIaj EAST BRIDGE PARK GAZEBO $100 $125 5.2o O O O — ---RIVER OVERLOOK ELLISON PARK GAZEBO $100 $125 5.3 0 0 fl 0 0 'a a HANDICAP PLAY AREAS ELLISON PARK LOG SHELTER $100 $125 5.3 0 0 O 0 HANDICAP PLAY AREAS 7C WEST BRIDGE PARK (COMMUNITY ROOM $100 $125 2.50_O 0 O 0 0 0 00 000 FISHING PIER, CANOE LAUNCH X WEST BRIDGE PARK (PICNIC SHELTER $100 $125 2.50_0 CPO 00 O 0 0 O O _O _I-- FISHING PIER, CANOE LAUNCH PIONEER PARK CONCESSION STAND $100 $125 23.2 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GROVELAND PARK PICNIC SHELTER $100 $125 4.20 0 0 0 OTTER CREEK PARK GAZEBO $50 $75 0.4 0 • 0 o m 0 CREEKOVERLOOK SUB -TOTAL RENTAL FEE Renters Email Address KEY/CLEAN-UP DEPOSIT • $200 $200'DEPOSIT WILL BEREFUNDED AFTER KEYISRETURNED AND/OR FACILITY HAS BEEN INSPECTED TOTAL AMOUNT DUE PAID CASH I CREDIT CARD CHECK# �1T l'� tY'.'all:'1'i'I'1 { la�'.,1'r �I • a1 i1 iA,.a 1'17t �1 x,41.1 11 yI.l 11��' , -1% ! a 4i N �L'-ni�I �_ IA j.a"1l1'a •yJ..N Jl\MoLmSi 1, KaiiW'..4s« I (NAME: �orN 4 6, i C)I ) (ORGANIZATION: ��e.CuS� _ — NON-PROFIT ID: JIADDRESS: _ JCITY: �r� �-(� �� t�� STATE: ZIP: PHONE: (RESERVATION DATE REQUESTED. I L FROM: ANI/PIV TO: Apq/ph1 i I HAVE RECEIVED, READ AND AGREE TO ABIDE BY ALL PARK ORDINANCES, RULES AND REGULATIONS, AS WELL AS ALL CONDITIONS SET FORTH IN THIS PERMIT ANP IN THE PARK RESERVATION POLICY J SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT: C� r /] , i L �^ l7 4'1s� V W DATE: ISSUED BY: / I e6 n DATE: q I/T� / I 7 r IKey 6 garbage bags Copy of reservation confirmation SIGNED BY. DATE Guest Services Associate Renter Signature IKEY ISSUED: Y / N (KEY #: FACILITY INSPECTED BY. IKEY RETURNED: Y/ N GATE: DEPOSIT CHECK RETURNED: Y / N I DATE: PERMIT FAUST BE TURi IED ISI TO CIT`( HALL AT SOS INALNU f STREET, SUITE 1, mot iTICELLO, PAS I CALL 753-297-2711 INITH QUESTIONS AC"R" CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE DATE(MM/DD/YYYY) I 6/7/2017 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). PRODUCER I CONTACT NAME: Lucas Olson Christensen Group Insurance I HONE .ext/: (952) 653-1000 I AIC. No): (952) 653-1100 11100 Bren Road WestIADDRESS:lolson@christensengroup.com INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC # Minnetonka MN 55343 I INSURER A :West Bend Mutual 15350 INSURED I INSURER B: Monticello Lions Club IINSURER C: PO Box 673 INSURER D INSURER E: Monticello MN 55362 INSURER F: COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER:17-18 Liab REVISION NUMBER: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. INSR ADDL SUBR POLICY EFFPOLICY EXP LTR TYPE OF INSURANCE wgn wvn POLICY NUMBER (MM/DD/YYYYI I (MM/DD/YYYYI I LIMITS X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY A -� CLAIMS -MADE X❑ OCCUR A107246 GEML AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: POLICY PRO ❑ LOC X JECT OTHER: AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY ANY AUTO ALL OWNEDSCHEDULED AUTOS AUTOS NON -OWNED HIRED AUTOS AUTOS UMBRELLA LIABHOLAIMS CCUR EXCESS LIAB C -MADE DED I I RETENTION $ WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY Y / N ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? Ll N/A (Mandatory in NH) If yes, describe under DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below A LIQUOR LIABILITY I A107247 1/1/2017 1/1/2018 EACH OCCURRENCE $ DAMAGE TO RENTED PREMISES (Ea occurrence) $ MED EXP (Any one person) I $ PERSONAL & ADV INJURY $ GENERAL AGGREGATE I$ PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG I $ I$ COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT $ (Ea accident) BODILY INJURY (Per per $ BODILY INJURY (Per accident) $ PROPERTY DAMAGE $ (Per accident) EACH OCCURRENCE $ (AGGREGATE $ $ PER I STATUTE I IEERH I E.L. EACH ACCIDENT Is I E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYE $ E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT $ 1/1/2017 1 1/1/2018 EACH COMMON CAUSE AGGREGATE 1,000,000 100,000 EXCLUDED 1,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS / VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached if more space is required) RE: Monticello Lions Brewfest - West Bridge Park Certificate Holder is included as an Additional Insured under the Commercial General Liability and Liquor Liability when required by written contract. CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE City of Monticello THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN 505 Walnut St ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. Monticello, MN 55362 AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE Bruce Christensen/LMO ©1988-2014 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. ACORD 25 (2014/01) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD INS025 (201401) City Council Agenda: 06/26/17 2G. Consideration of approving a Special Event Permit for outdoor entertainment at Chatter's Bar & Grill on Julv 14 and 15, 2017. Applicant: Steffens, Brooke/Chatters Restaurant (JS) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The City has received a Special Event permit application from Chatters Restaurant for live entertainment activities after 10 p.m. Special Event permits are also brought to the City Council if there is the potential that the activity proposed could impact the City's regulations pertaining to noise. The Special Event Ordinance allows the City Council to approve Special Event permits for activity after 10 p.m. 3-19-2: (D) Special events shall not operate before 7 a.m. or after 10 p.m. unless a Special Event Permit (or other) for such activity has been approved by the City Council. Such permit supersedes the provisions of City Code 6-1-10(B). In this case, Chatter's Restaurant has applied for a Special Event permit for Friday evening, July 14, 2017, and Saturday, July 15, 2017. Their outdoor events are proposed to take place both evenings from 9:00 p.m. to 1:00 a.m. The applicant intends to have live music Friday evening, and a DJ service on Saturday evening. As described by the applicant in their site plan and narrative, it is their intent to have the activity occur in the west area of their parking lot. The Chatters property itself is located directly adjacent on its west property line to Highway 25. The site is surrounded to the north, east and south by commercial property. The property is located approximately 735 feet from the nearest residential property, which is in the Groveland neighborhood. The Groveland neighborhood is separated from the site by both commercial property and Highway 25. The applicant's narrative indicates that the band would be oriented north inside the tent for the event. By orienting the band to the north, the restaurant is intending to minimize the potential the noise impacts to the residential area located to the west. The restaurant is also proposing to enclose the band and activity area with a 30' x 60' tent. The area will also be fenced. The Wright County Sheriff's Office received a copy of the permit application for review. In 2015 the Sheriff's Office did receive a call for response to a disturbance, but indicated that there were no concerns regarding issuance of this year's permit. Al. Budget Impact: None. City Council Agenda: 06/26/17 A2. Staff Workload Impact: Minimal staff time was necessary to review the request and prepare this report. No additional staff time is anticipated for this request. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the Special Event Permit for outdoor entertainment at Chatter's Restaurant Bar & Grill for July 14 and 15, 2017, as described in the application materials, including: a. Exemption from the noise ordinance b. Pending approval of Chief Building Official on tent permit. 2. Motion to deny the Special Event Permit for outdoor entertainment at Chatter's Restaurant Bar & Grill, based on findings to be made by the City Council. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends Alternative #I above. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Application & Narrative B. Certificate of Liability Coverage C. Event Map 2 CITY �o r CITY OF MONTICELLO i Community Development 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1 Special Event Permit Monticeffo Monticello, MN 55362 (763) 295-2711 . info iki.monticello.mn.us Application Checklist PROPERTY INFORMATION Property Address Li491 l_ t -CJ +-. Ct - M tM (r j I P , h �-i 56V Z 1 Property Legal Description ' Property ID Number Owner Name Owner Address `�I! Owner Phone Owner Email Applicant Name Applicant Address ( (�dq,�''i -fi M001(IrA 10 M 0 �3U Z Applicant Phone ;` )-I I ` D 6 h ) I✓�.I� °�l-k I XJ i0 (W 1) Applicant Email ��I d � 1 AA- (b Name of Event p b. " Location/Address of Event 6J1 - Dates & Times of Event�r,�'"k.pi-1AM4yz/�tVhwAAjjkAj+- h - Complete Application Required The review and consideration of an application submitted shall only occur if such application includes all items that are required in support of the application and is deemed complete by the City Clerk's Office. Application Submission Schedule Application, required information, and payment must be submitted no later than 30 working days prior to desired approval date. Application Information Applicants shall note that in addition to a special event permits, any liquor license or permit, sign permits and building permits for tents may also be required and are not included within the special event permit application and approval. Any requested use of City facilities, City staff resources, City equipment, and/or City property (including rights of way) and/or any requested waiver of application fee or park rental fees requires review and approval by the City Council. In addition, events which occur after 10 PM may requires review and approval by the City Council as related to noise ordinances. Please provide clear information in the application regarding these requests. 07/25/16 APPLICANT APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTSI CITY CHECK-IN CHECK A written narrative including: 1. A description of the proposed special event, how it will function on the property, hours and dates of operation, and any other information necessary to fully describe the request; and 2. An explanation of how the proposed special event will meet each of the review criteria specified by code (on reverse), as well as any additional criteria that may apply for the specific use. 3. Any requested use of City facilities, City staff resources, City equipment and City property (including rights of way) and/or any requested waiver of application fee or park rental fees requires review and approval by the City Council A site plan showing all information necessary to accurately depict how the proposed use will function on the site. Information required on the site plan shall include but not be limited to: 1. The location of all existing and proposed structures; 2. Driveways and parking areas; 3. Proposed storage spaces; 4. Natural features such as woodlands, wetlands, shorelines, etc; 5. Proposed number of parking spaces (if applicable). If deemed necessary by the Community Development Department, a survey may be required to be submitted with the application in addition to a site plan. Certificate of insurance/liability coverage. Electronic copies of all written narratives and plan sets required above. Application fee of $50.00. Special Event Review Process • The City Clerk will review all Temporary Use Permit applications. • Applications determined to conform with the approval criteria outlined in Monticello Zoning Code Section 2.4(L)(4)(a) and listed below shall be approved by the Community Development Department with any conditions deemed necessary. A copy of the approved permit shall be provided to the applicant which includes all conditions and comments. • Applications not conforming with the approval criteria outlined in Section 2.4(L)(4)(a) shall be denied by the Community Development Department. • A notice of denial shall be provided to the applicant which includes all identified reasons for denial. Special Event Temporary Use Permit Approval Criteria Approval of a Temporary Use Permit shall only be granted once the City Clerk has determined the use shall: • Not be detrimental to property or improvements in the surrounding area or to the public health, safety, or general welfare; • Be compatible with the principal uses taking place on the site; • Not have substantial adverse effects or noise impacts on nearby residential neighborhoods; 07/25/16 2 Special Event Temporary Use Permit Approval Criteria, cont. • Not include permanent alterations to the site; • Not maintain temporary signs associated with the use or structure after the activity ends; • Not violate the applicable conditions of approval that apply to a site or use on the site; • Not interfere with the normal operations of any permanent use located on the property; and • Contain sufficient land area to allow the temporary use, structure, or special event to occur, as well as adequate land to accommodate the parking and traffic movement associated with the temporary use, without disturbing environmentally sensitive lands. • Not create an unreasonable risk of significant: 1. Damage to public or private property, beyond normal wear and tear; 2. Injury to persons; 3. Public or private disturbances or nuisances; 4. Unsafe impediments or distractions to, or congestion of, vehicular or pedestrian travel; 5. Additional and impracticable or unduly burdensome police, fire, trash removal, maintenance, or other public services demands; and 6. Other adverse effects upon the public health, safety, or welfare. The special event shall not be of such a nature, size, or duration that the particular location requested cannot reasonably accommodate the event. The special event shall not conflict with another permitted special event at the same location in a manner that will negatively impact the public health, welfare, or safety. Special Event Temporary Use Permit Conditions of Approval • In approving the Temporary Use Permit for the special event, the City Clerk's Office is authorized to impose such conditions upon the issuance of the permit as may be necessary to reduce or minimize any potential adverse impacts upon other property in the area, as long as the condition relates to a situation created or aggravated by the proposed special event. The Community Development Department is authorized, where appropriate, to require: 1. Provision of temporary parking facilities, including vehicular access and egress. 2. Control of nuisance factors, such as but not limited to, the prevention of glare or direct illumination of adjacent properties, noise, vibrations, smoke, dust, dirt, odors, gases, and heat. 3. Regulation of temporary buildings, structures and facilities, including placement, height and size, location of equipment and open spaces, including buffer areas and other yards. 4. Provision of sanitary and medical facilities. 5. Provision of solid waste collection and disposal. 6. Provision of security and safety measures. 7. Use of an alternative location or date for the proposed special event. 8. Modification or elimination of certain proposed activities. 9. Regulation of operating hours and days, including limitation of the duration of the special event to a shorter time period than that requested or specified in this subsection. 10. Submission of a performance guarantee to ensure that any temporary facilities or structures used for such proposed special event will be removed from the site within a reasonable time following the event and that the property will be restored to its former condition. Duration of Permit A temporary use permit for a special event authorized in accordance with this subsection shall be limited to a maximum duration of 14 days per site per calendar year, unless otherwise specifically authorized by the City Clerk. 07/25/16 3 Property Owner's Statement I am the fee title owner of the described property and I agree to this application. I certify that I am in compliance with all ordinance requirements and conditions regarding other City approval that have been previously granted. (Sinatur) (Date) Applicant's Statement This application shall be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding the application. I have completed all of the applicable filing requirements and I hereby acknowledge that I have read and fully understand the applicable provisions of the City Ordinances and current policies related to this application and that the documents and information I have submitted are true and correct. (Signature) r �� (Date) 1 CITY APPROVAL (City Clerk Signature) (Date) (Community Development Director Signature) I (Date) Special Event Permit I Approved ❑ I Denied ❑ Approval is granted with the following conditions: Internal review checklist (as applicable): Public Works Routing Law Enforcement Notification Building Department Monticello Community Center Room/Park Reservations Post -Approval Routing/Requirements Applicant Public Works Law Enforcement Notification City Clerk Monticello Community Center Room/Park Reservations Liability Insurance Certificate Received Surrounding Property Owner Notification Complete Admin I Parks I Streets Director 07/25/16 4 Aii'DSOR" ® CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCEI DATE(MM/DD/YYYY) 06/05/2017 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). PRODUCER CONTACT Cheryl Johnson NE Advantage 1 Insurance { /C No' Ext,: 320-253-3525 FAX No,: 320 650-1361 3801 N 3rd Street, Suite 100 I t MAIL ADDRESS: info@advantageoneins.com eoneins.com S SAINT CLOUD, MN 56303 I INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE I NAIC# INSURER F: COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: 00000000-641678 REVISION NUMBER: 8 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. ILTR TYPE OF INSURANCE N� WVD i POLICY NUMBER (MML/DDY) IMMIDDEFF NYYYI XP i LIMITS A X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY Y '08093251 07/01/2017 07/01/20181 EACH OCCURRENCE $ 1,000,000 CLAIMS -MAGE OCCUR DAMAGE TO RENTED I PREMISES (Ea occurrence) I $ 300,000 GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: POLICY n JEPRO- n LOC OTHER: A AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY ANY AUTO OWNED SCHEDULED AUTOS ONLYAUTOS X HIRED AUTOS ONLY X AUTNOOS ONLY A X UMBRELLA LIAB OCCUR EXCESS LIAB I—XI CLAIMS -MADE DED I X I RETENTION $ 10,000 B WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY Y / N ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? ❑ N / A (Mandatory in NH) It yes, describe under DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below A Liquor Liability INSURERA: Auto Owners Insurance Co. INSURED WEST RIVER RESTAURANTS INC INSURERB: Ram Mutual Insurance DBA CHATTERS RESTAURANT & BAR INSURER C: 4089 CEDAR ST INSURERD: MONTICELLO, MN 55362,4524 I INSURERE: INSURER F: COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: 00000000-641678 REVISION NUMBER: 8 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. ILTR TYPE OF INSURANCE N� WVD i POLICY NUMBER (MML/DDY) IMMIDDEFF NYYYI XP i LIMITS A X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY Y '08093251 07/01/2017 07/01/20181 EACH OCCURRENCE $ 1,000,000 CLAIMS -MAGE OCCUR DAMAGE TO RENTED I PREMISES (Ea occurrence) I $ 300,000 GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: POLICY n JEPRO- n LOC OTHER: A AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY ANY AUTO OWNED SCHEDULED AUTOS ONLYAUTOS X HIRED AUTOS ONLY X AUTNOOS ONLY A X UMBRELLA LIAB OCCUR EXCESS LIAB I—XI CLAIMS -MADE DED I X I RETENTION $ 10,000 B WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY Y / N ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? ❑ N / A (Mandatory in NH) It yes, describe under DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below A Liquor Liability DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS I LOCATIONS I VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached If more space is required) Restaurants with sale of 30% or more butless than 75% liquor. City of Monticello is listed as additional insured in regards to the special event being held July 14 & 15th 2017. CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN City of Monticello ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. 505 Walnut St #1 Monticello, MN 55632 AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE (CU) ©1988-2015 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. ACORD 25 (2016103) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD Printed by CLJ on June 05, 2017 at 02:15PM MED EXP (Any one person) $ 10,000 1 PERSONAL&ADV INJURY $ 1,000,000 GENERAL AGGREGATE I $ 2,000,000 PRODUCTS-COMP/OPAGG $ 11000,000 08093251 07/01/2017 07/01/2018 I Ea accideD SINGLE LIMIT I $ 1.000 000 BODILY INJURY (Per person) $ BODILY INJURY (Per accident) I $ PROPERTY DAMAGE $ I (Per accident/ $ 4902028700 07/01/2017 07/01/2018 I EACH OCCURRENCE $ 1,000,000 AGGREGATE .. _._ $, 1,000,000 WC 190485.05 07/01/2017 PER 07/01/2018 X I STATUTE I EERH I E.L. EACH ACCIDENT Is 500,000 I E.L. DISEASE- EA EMPLOYE $ 500,000 I E.L. DISEASE-POLICYLIMIT� $ 500,000 08093251 107101/2017 07/01120181 Liquor 1 1,000,000 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS I LOCATIONS I VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached If more space is required) Restaurants with sale of 30% or more butless than 75% liquor. City of Monticello is listed as additional insured in regards to the special event being held July 14 & 15th 2017. CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN City of Monticello ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. 505 Walnut St #1 Monticello, MN 55632 AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE (CU) ©1988-2015 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. ACORD 25 (2016103) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD Printed by CLJ on June 05, 2017 at 02:15PM Chatters Restaurant and Bar with be hosting Diamondback (live band) on Friday July 14th 2017 from 9:OOpm to 1:OOam and a DJ (live music) on Saturday July 15`h 2017. We would like to have the band & DJ perform on our front parking lot. The band will be facing north towards the restaurant. The band/DJ will not be facing residential housing. We are also providing a party tent that will cover the entire band/DJ along with all of our customers which will help with a lot of the noise. We will have a 30x60 ft. tent that will also be fenced off along with a small part of the parking lot. A site plan is attached to show you what spots we will be using. If you have any further questions please feel free to contact me at 763-271-0070. Thank You, Brooke Steffens -Owner 11 CED4R 5TREET [SITE FI—AN WSTA7 4 BAR City Council Agenda: 6/26/17 211. Consideration of approving annual liquor license renewals for 2017-2018 (JS) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: City Council is asked to approve the liquor license renewals for 2017-2018 as listed below. The businesses listed are the current license holders on record and have submitted their approval for renewal. When paperwork and payment was returned, staff reviewed each renewal to ensure that paperwork was completed in compliance with State Alcohol & Gambling rules and state laws. Renewal forms were sent to the County Sheriff for verification and signature. The completed renewals, following tonight's approval, will be sent in to the State Alcohol & Gambling Division for their stamp of approval, which allows the license holders to purchase alcoholic beverages from approved wholesalers. The City is responsible for issuing the annual licenses and sending them to the licensed premises, where they are to be displayed on site. The following licenses are submitted for approval. Liquor - On -Sale (fee $3,750) 1. Applebee's Neighborhood Grill & Bar (Apple Minnesota LLC) 2. Beef O'Bradys (TMC & J Taylor Corp.) 3. Buffalo Wild Wings #210 (Blazin Wings Inc.) 4. Capitan Pancho Villa (IC Enterprises LLC) 5. Chatters Restaurant & Bar (West River Restaurants Inc.) 6. Cornerstone Cafe & Catering (Cornerstone Cafe & Catering Co.) 7. Hawk's Sports Bar & Grill (Hawk's Sports Bar & Grill Inc.) 8. Monticello Country Club (Monticello Country Club Inc.) 9. Rancho Grande (Rancho Grande Mex. Rest. Inc. #2) 10. River City Extreme (River City Extreme Inc.) 11. VFW 8731 (Club Dorchester) Liquor — On -Sale, Sundav (fee $200) 1. Applebee's Neighborhood Grill & Bar (Apple Minnesota LLC) 2. Beef O'Bradys (TMC & J Taylor Corp.) 3. Buffalo Wild Wings #210 (Blazin Wings Inc.) 4. Capitan Pancho Villa (IC Enterprises LLC) 5. Chatters Restaurant & Bar (West River Restaurants Inc.) 6. Cornerstone Cafe & Catering (Cornerstone Cafe & Catering Co.) 7. Hawk's Sports Bar & Grill (Hawk's Sports Bar & Grill Inc.) 8. Monticello Country Club (Monticello Country Club Inc.) 9. Rancho Grande (Rancho Grande Mex. Rest. Inc. #2) 10. River City Extreme (River City Extreme Inc.) 12. American Legion Club 260 13. VFW 8731 (Club Dorchester) Liquor - Club (fee -set by statute based on membership) 1. American Legion 260 - $500 City Council Agenda: 6/26/17 Liquor - Wine/Strong Beer Combination ($1,200) 1. Bluestone Grill (Pauly Companies Inc.) Liquor — Wine (fee $250) 1. Asian Cafe Sushi Grill Inc. 3.2% Beer - On -Sale (fee $275) 1. Bluestone Grill (Pauly Companies Inc.) 2. Asian Cafe Sushi Grill Inc. 3. China Buffet (Lin, Chuan) 4. Monticello Community Center Concessions at Ballfields (City of Monticello) 3.2% Beer - Off -Sale (fee $100) 1. Cub Foods (Monticello 1998 LLC) 2. Kwik Trip #177 (Kwik Trip Inc.) 3. Kwik Trip #345 (Kwik Trip Inc.) 4. SuperAmerica #4479 (Northern Tier Retail LLC) 5. Target Store T-2180 (Target Corporation) 6. Wal-Mart Supercenter #3624 (Wal-Mart Stores Inc Al. Budget Impact: The license fees established for the annual renewals are intended to cover the costs of the renewal processing. A2. Staff Workload Impact: City staff prepares and mails the billings, handles the renewal paperwork and payments, and then issues the licenses after all steps are completed. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the license renewals for 2017-2018 effective July 1, 2017 to June 30, 2018. 2. Motion to deny all or selected license renewals at this time. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative #1. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Copies of Renewal of Liquor, Wine, Club or 3.2% Licenses for local businesses 2 Minnesota Department of Public Safety Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement 445 Minnesota Street, Suite 222 Alcohol & Gambling Enforcement St. Paul, MN 55101 651-201-7500 RENEWAL OF LIQUOR, WINE, CLUB OR 3.2 % LICENSES No license will be approve or released until the $20 Retailer ID Card fee is received by Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Licensee: Please verify your license information contained below. Make corrections if necessary and sign. City Clerk/County Auditor should submit this signed renewal with completed license and licensee liquor liability for the new license period. City Clerk/County Auditor are also required by M.S. 340A.404 S.3 to report any license cancellation. License Code ONSS License Period Ending 6/30/2017 ID# 30773 ISSUING AUTHORITY Monticello Licensee Name Apple Minnesota LLC Trade Name Applebee's Neighborhood Grill & Bar City, State, Zip Code *9386 Deegan Ave Monticello MN 55362 Business Phone 7632956337 License Fees: Off Sale On Sale $3,750.00 Sunday $200.00 By signing this renewal application, applicant certifies that there has been no change in ownership on the above named licensee. For changes in ownership, the licensee named above, or for new licensees, full applications should be used. Sf back of this application for further information needed to complete this renewal. Applicant's signature on this renewal confirms the following: Failure to report anv of the following may result in civil penalties. 1. Licensee confirms it has no interest whatsoever, directly or indirectly in any other liquor establishments in Minnesota. If so, give details on back of this application. 2. Licensee confirms that it has never had a liquor license rejected by any city/township/county in the state of Minnesota. If ever rejected, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below. 3. Licensee confirms that for the past five years it has not had a liquor license revoked for any liquor law violation (state or local). If a revocation has occurred, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below. 4. Licensee confirms that during the past five years it or its employees have not been cited for any civil or criminal liquor law violations. If violations have occurred, please give details on back of this renewal, then sign below. 5. Licensee confirms that during the past license year, a summons has not been issued under the Liquor Liability Law (Dram Shop) MS 340A.802. If yes, attach a copy of the summons, then sign below. 6. Licensee confirms that Workers Compensation insurance will be kept in effect during the license period. Licensee has attached a liquor liability insurance certificate that corresponds with the license period in city/county where license is issued. $100,000 in cash or securities or $100,000 surety bond may be submitted in lieu of liquor liability. (3.2& liquor licenses are exempt if sales are less than $25,000 at on sale, or $50,000 at off sale). Licensee Signature DOB SS# Date (Signature certifies all above information to be correct and license has been approved by city/county.) City Clerk/County Auditor Signature Date (Signature certifies that renewal of a liquor, wine or club license has been approved by the city/county as stated above.) County Attorney Signature County Board issued licenses only(Signature certifies licensee is eligible for license). Date Police/Sheriff Signature Date Signature certifies licensee or associates have been checked for any state/local liquor law violations (criminal/civil) during the past five years. Report violations on back, then sign here. Minnesota Department of Public Safety r Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement i 445 Minnesota Street, Suite 222 Alcohol & Gambling Enforcemem St. Paul, MN 55101 651-201-7500 RENEWAL OF LIQUOR, WINE, CLUB OR 3.2% LICENSES No license will be approve or released until the $20 Retailer ID Card fee is received by Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Licensee: Please verify your license information contained below. Make corrections if necessary and sign. City Clerk/County Auditor should submit this signed renewal with completed license and licensee liquor liability for the new license period. City Clerk/County Auditor are also required by M.S. 340A.404 S.3 to report any license cancellation. License Code ONSS License Period Ending 6/30/2017 ID# 29468 ISSUING AUTHORITY Monticello Licensee Name TMC & J Taylor Corp. Trade Name Beef O'Bradys City, State, Zip Code 254 W Broadway St Monticello MN 55362 Business Phone 7633558702 License Fees: Off Sale On Sale $3,750.00 Sunday $200.00 By signing this renewal application, applicant certifies that there has been no change in ownership on the above named licensee. For changes in ownership, the licensee named above, or for new licensees, full applications should be used. Si back of this application for further information needed to complete this renewal. Applicant's sicnature on this renewal confirms the followinc: Failure to report anv of the following may result in civil penalties. 1. Licensee confirms it has no interest whatsoever, directly or indirectly in any other liquor establishments in Minnesota. If so, give details on back of this application. 2. Licensee confirms that it has never had a liquor license rejected by any city/township/county in the state of Minnesota. If ever rejected, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below. 3. Licensee confirms that for the past five years it has not had a liquor license revoked for any liquor law violation (state or local). If a revocation has occurred, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below. 4. Licensee confirms that during the past five years it or its employees have not been cited for any civil or criminal liquor law violations. If violations have occurred, please give details on back of this renewal, then sign below. 5. Licensee confirms that during the past license year, a summons has not been issued under the Liquor Liability Law (Dram Shop) MS 340A.802. If yes, attach a copy of the summons, then sign below. 6. Licensee confirms that Workers Compensation insurance will be kept in effect during the license period. Licensee has attached a liquor liability insurance certificate that corresponds with the license period in city/county where license is issued. $100,000 in cash or securities or $100,000 surety bond may be submitted in lieu of liquor liability. (3.2& liquor licenses are exempt if sales are less than $25,000 at on sale, or $50,000 at off sale). Licensee Signature DOB SS# Date (Signature certifies all above information to be correct and license has been approved by city/county.) City Clerk/County Auditor Signature Date (Signature certifies that renewal of a liquor, wine or club license has been approved by the city/county as stated above.) County Attorney Signature County Board issued licenses only(Signature certifies licensee is eligible for license). Date Police/Sheriff Signature Date Signature certifies licensee or associates have been checked for any state/local liquor law violations (criminal/civil) during the past five years. Report violations on back, then sign here. Minnesota Department of Public Safety Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement 445 Minnesota Street, Suite 222 Alcahol & Gambling Enimmemeni St. Paul, MN 55101 651-201-7500 RENEWAL OF LIQUOR, WINE, CLUB OR 3.2% LICENSES No license will be approve or released until the $20 Retailer 1D Card fee is received by Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Licensee: Please verify your license information contained below. Make corrections if necessary and sign. City Clerk/County Auditor should submit this signed renewal with completed license and licensee liquor liability for the new license period. City Clerk/County Auditor are also required by M.S. 340A.404 S.3 to report any license cancellation. License Code ONSS License Period Ending 6/30/2017 ID# 26234 ISSUING AUTHORITY Monticello Licensee Name Blazin Wings Inc. Trade Name Buffalo Wild Wings #210 City, State, Zip Code *9221 Cedar Street Monticello MN 55362 Business Phone 2187225100 License Fees: Off Sale $0.00 On Sale $3,750.00 Sunday $200.00 By signing this renewal application, applicant certifies that there has been no change in ownership on the above named licensee. For changes in ownership, the licensee named above, or for new licensees, full applications should be used. Si back of this application for further information needed to complete this renewal. Applicant's signature on this renewal confirms the following: Failure to report anv of the following may result in civil penalties. 1: Licensee confirms it has no interest whatsoever, directly or indirectly in any other liquor establishments in Minnesota. If so, give details on back of this application. 2. Licensee confirms that it has never had a liquor license rejected by any city/township/county in the state of Minnesota. If ever rejected, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below. 3. Licensee confirms that for the past five years it has not had a liquor license revoked for any liquor law violation (state or local). If a revocation has occurred, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below. 4. Licensee confirms that during the past five years it or its employees have not been cited for any civil or criminal liquor law violations. If violations have occurred, please give details on back of this renewal, then sign below. 5. Licensee confirms that during the past license year, a summons has not been issued under the Liquor Liability Law (Dram Shop) MS 340A.802. If yes, attach a copy of the summons, then sign below. 6. Licensee confirms that Workers Compensation insurance will be kept in effect during the license period. Licensee has attached a liquor liability insurance certificate that corresponds with the license period in city/county where license is issued. $100,000 in cash or securities or $100,000 surety bond may be submitted in lieu of liquor liability. (3.2& liquor licenses are exempt if sales are less than $25,000 at on sale, or $50,000 at off sale). Licensee Signature DOB SS# Date (Signature certifies all above information to be correct and license has been approved by city/county.) City Clerk/County Auditor Signature Date (Signature certifies that renewal of a liquor, wine or club license has been approved by the city/county as stated above.) County Attorney Signature County Board issued licenses only(Signature certifies licensee is eligible for license). Date Police/Sheriff Signature Date Signature certifies licensee or associates have been checked for any state/local liquor law violations (criminal/civil) during the past five years. Report violations on back, then sign here. Minnesota Department of Public Safety Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement 445 Minnesota Street, Suite 222 Alcohol?§ GamblingEntorcemem St. Paul, MN 55101 651-201-7500 RENEWAL OF LIQUOR, WINE, CLUB OR 3.2% LICENSES No license will he approve or released until the $20 Retailer ID Card fee is received by Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Licensee: Please verify your license information contained below. Make corrections if necessary and sign. City Clerk/County Auditor should submit this signed renewal with completed license and licensee liquor liability for the new license period. City Clerk/County Auditor are also required by M.S. 340A.404 S.3 to report any license cancellation. License Code ONSS License Period Ending 6/30/2017 ISSUING AUTHORITY Monticello Licensee Name IC Enterprises LLC Trade Name Capitan Pancho Villa City, State, Zip Code 100 7th Street W Monticello MN 55362 Business Phone 7633140454 License Fees: Off Sale On Sale $3,750.00 Sunday ID# 33416 $200.00 By signing this renewal application, applicant certifies that there has been no change in ownership on the above named licensee. For changes in ownership, the licensee named above, or for new licensees, full applications should be used. SI back of this application for further information needed to complete this renewal. Applicant's signature on this renewal confirms the following: Failure to report anv of the following may result in civil penalties. 1. Licensee confirms it has no interest whatsoever, directly or indirectly in any other liquor establishments in Minnesota. If so, give details on back of this application. 2. Licensee confirms that it has never had a liquor license rejected by any city/township/county in the state of Minnesota. If ever rejected, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below. 3. Licensee confirms that for the past five years it has not had a liquor license revoked for any liquor law violation (state or local). If a revocation has occurred, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below. 4. Licensee confirms that during the past five years it or its employees have not been cited for any civil or criminal liquor law violations. If violations have occurred, please give details on back of this renewal, then sign below. 5. Licensee confirms that during the past license year, a summons has not been issued under the Liquor Liability Law (Dram Shop) MS 340A.802. If yes, attach a copy of the summons, then sign below. 6. Licensee confirms that Workers Compensation insurance will be kept in effect during the license period. Licensee has attached a liquor liability insurance certificate that corresponds with the license period in city/county where license is issued. $100,000 in cash or securities or $100,000 surety bond may be submitted in lieu of liquor liability. (3.2& liquor licenses are exempt if sales are less than $25,000 at on sale, or $50,000 at off sale). Licensee Signature DOB SS# Date (Signature certifies all above information to be correct and license has been approved by city/county.) City Clerk/County Auditor Signature Date (Signature certifies that renewal of a liquor, wine or club license has been approved by the city/county as stated above.) County Attorney Signature County Board issued licenses only(Signature certifies licensee is eligible for license). Date Police/Sheriff Signature Date Signature certifies licensee or associates have been checked for any state/local liquor law violations (criminal/civil) during the past five years. Report violations on back, then sign here. Minnesota Department of Public Safety i Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement 445 Minnesota Street, Suite 222 Alcohol & Gambling Enforcement St. Paul, MN 55101 651-201-7500 RENEWAL OF LIQUOR, WINE, CLUB OR 3.2% LICENSES No license will be approve or released until the $20 Retailer lD Card fee is received by Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Licensee: Please verify your license information contained below. Make corrections if necessary and sign. City Clerk/County Auditor should submit this signed renewal with completed license and licensee liquor liability for the new license period. City Clerk/County Auditor are also required by M.S. 340A.404 S.3 to report any license cancellation. License Code ONSS License Period Ending 6/30/2017 ISSUING AUTHORITY Monticello Licensee Name West River Restaurants Inc. Trade Name Chatters Restaurant & Bar City, State, Zip Code 4181 Cedar St Monticello MN 55362 Business Phone 7632710070 License Fees: Off Sale On Sale $3,750.00 Sunday ID# 22836 $200.00 By signing this renewal application, applicant certifies that there has been no change in ownership on the above named licensee. For changes in ownership, the licensee named above, or for new licensees, full applications should be used. SI back of this application for further information needed to complete this renewal. Anulicant's sienature on this renewal confirms the following: Failure to report anv of the followine may result in civil penalties. 1. Licensee confirms it has no interest whatsoever, directly or indirectly in any other liquor establishments in Minnesota. If so, give details on back of this application. 2. Licensee confirms that it has never had a liquor license rejected by any city/township/county in the state of Minnesota. If ever rejected, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below. 3. Licensee confirms that for the past five years it has not had a liquor license revoked for any liquor law violation (state or local). If a revocation has occurred, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below. 4. Licensee confirms that during the past five years it or its employees have not been cited for any civil or criminal liquor law violations. If violations have occurred, please give details on back of this renewal, then sign below. 5. Licensee confirms that during the past license year, a summons has not been issued under the Liquor Liability Law (Dram Shop) MS 340A.802. If yes, attach a copy of the summons, then sign below. 6. Licensee confirms that Workers Compensation insurance will be kept in effect during the license period. Licensee has attached a liquor liability insurance certificate that corresponds with the license period in city/county where license is issued. $100,000 in cash or securities or $100,000 surety bond may be submitted in lieu of liquor liability. (3.2& liquor licenses are exempt if sales are less than $25,000 at on sale, or $50,000 at off sale). Licensee Signature DOB SS# Date (Signature certifies all above information to be correct and license has been approved by city/county.) City Clerk/County Auditor Signature Date (Signature certifies that renewal of a liquor, wine or club license has been approved by the city/county as stated above.) County Attorney Signature County Board issued licenses only(Signature certifies licensee is eligible for license). Date Police/Sheriff Signature Date Signature certifies licensee or associates have been checked for any state/local liquor law violations (criminal/civil) during the past five years. Report violations on back, then sign here. Minnesota Department of Public Safety Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement 445 Minnesota Street, Suite 222 Alcohol & Gambling Eaimcemem St. Paul, MN 55 101 651-201-7500 RENEWAL OF LIQUOR, WINE, CLUB OR 3.2 % LICENSES No license will be approve or released until the $20 Retailer ID Card fee is received by Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Licensee: Please verify your license information contained below. Make corrections if necessary and sign. City Clerk/County Auditor should submit this signed renewal with completed license and licensee liquor liability for the new license period. City Clerk/County Auditor are also required by M.S. 340A.404 S.3 to report any license cancellation. License Code ONSS License Period Ending 6/30/2017 ID# 22042 ISSUING AUTHORITY Monticello Licensee Name Cornerstone Cafe & Catering Co. Trade Name Cornerstone Cafe & Catering City, State, Zip Code 154 W Broadway/PO Box 535 Monticello MN 55362 Business Phone 7632953888 License Fees: Off Sale On Sale $3,750.00 Sunday $200.00 By signing this renewal application, applicant certifies that there has been no change in ownership on the above named licensee. For changes in ownership, the licensee named above, or for new licensees, full applications should be used. SI back of this application for further information needed to complete this renewal. Applicant's sienature on this renewal confirms the followine: Failure to report anv of the followins may result in civil penalties. 1. Licensee confirms it has no interest whatsoever, directly or indirectly in any other liquor establishments in Minnesota. If so, give details on back of this application. 2. Licensee confirms that it has never had a liquor license rejected by any city/township/county in the state of Minnesota. If ever rejected, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below. 3. Licensee confirms that for the past five years it has not had a liquor license revoked for any liquor law violation (state or local). If a revocation has occurred, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below. 4. Licensee confirms that during the past five years it or its employees have not been cited for any civil or criminal liquor law violations. If violations have occurred, please give details on back of this renewal, then sign below. 5. Licensee confirms that during the past license year, a summons has not been issued under the Liquor Liability. Law (Dram Shop) MS 340A.802. If yes, attach a copy of the summons, then sign below. 6. Licensee confirms that Workers Compensation insurance will be kept in effect during the license period. Licensee has attached a liquor liability insurance certificate that corresponds with the license period in city/county where license is issued. $100,000 in cash or securities or $100,000 surety bond may be submitted in lieu of liquor liability. (3.2& liquor licenses are exempt if sales are less than $25,000 at on sale, or $50,000 at off sale). Licensee Signature DOB SS# Date (Signature certifies all above information to be correct and license has been approved by city/county.) City Clerk/County Auditor Signature Date (Signature certifies that renewal of a liquor, wine or club license has been approved by the city/county as stated above.) County Attorney Signature County Board issued licenses only(Signature certifies licensee is eligible for license). Date Police/Sheriff Signature Date Signature certifies licensee or associates have been checked for any state/local liquor law violations (criminal/civil) during the past five years. Report violations on back, then sign here. Minnesota Department of Public Safety Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement 445 Minnesota Street, Suite 222 Alcohol& Gambling Enforcement St. Paul, MN 55101 651-201-7500 RENEWAL OF LIQUOR, WINE, CLUB OR 3.2 % LICENSES No license will be approve or released until the $20 Retailer 1D Card fee is received by Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Licensee: Please verify your license information contained below. Make corrections if necessary and sign. City Clerk/County Auditor should submit this signed renewal with completed license and licensee liquor liability for the new license period. City Clerk/County Auditor are also required by M.S. 340A.404 S.3 to report any license cancellation. License Code ONSS License Period Ending 6/30/2017 ID# 1625 ISSUING AUTHORITY Monticello Licensee Name Hawk's Sports Bar & Grill Inc. Trade Name Hawk's Sports Bar & Grill City, State, Zip Code 9697 Hart Blvd Monticello MN 55362 Business Phone 7632959990 License Fees: Off Sale $0.00 On Sale $3,750.00 Sunday $200.00 By signing this renewal application, applicant certifies that there has been no change in ownership on the above named licensee. For changes in ownership, the licensee named above, or for new licensees, full applications should be used. Si back of this application for further information needed to complete this renewal. Applicant's signature on this renewal confirms the followine: Failure to report anv of the followine may result in civil penalties. 1. Licensee confirms it has no interest whatsoever, directly or indirectly in any other liquor establishments in Minnesota. If so, give details on back of this application. 2. Licensee confirms that it has never had a liquor license rejected by any city/township/county in the state of Minnesota. If ever rejected, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below. 3. Licensee confirms that for the past five years it has not had a liquor license revoked for any liquor law violation (state or local). If a revocation has occurred, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below. 4. Licensee confirms that during the past five years it or its employees have not been cited for any civil or criminal liquor law violations. If violations have occurred, please give details on back of this renewal, then sign below. 5. Licensee confirms that during the past license year, a summons has not been issued under the Liquor Liability Law (Dram Shop) MS 340A.802. If yes, attach a copy of the summons, then sign below. 6. Licensee confirms that Workers Compensation insurance will be kept in effect during the license period. Licensee has attached a liquor liability insurance certificate that corresponds with the license period in city/county where license is issued. $100,000 in cash or securities or $100,000 surety bond may be submitted in lieu of liquor liability. (3.2& liquor licenses are exempt if sales are less than $25,000 at on sale, or $50,000 at off sale). Licensee Signature DOB SS# Date (Signature certifies all above information to be correct and license has been approved by city/county.) City Clerk/County Auditor Signature Date (Signature certifies that renewal of a liquor, wine or club license has been approved by the city/county as stated above.) County Attorney Signature County Board issued licenses only(Signature certifies licensee is eligible for license). Date Police/Sheriff Signature Date Signature certifies licensee or associates have been checked for any state/local liquor law violations (criminal/civil) during the past five years. Report violations on back, then sign here. Minnesota Department of Public Safety Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement 445 Minnesota Street, Suite 222 Alcohol & Gambling Eaiorcemem St. Paul, MN 55101 651-201-7500 RENEWAL OF LIQUOR, WINE, CLUB OR 3.2 % LICENSES No license will be approve or released until the $20 Retailer ID Card fee is received by Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Licensee: Please verify your license information contained below. Make corrections if necessary and sign. City Clerk/County Auditor should submit this signed renewal with completed license and licensee liquor liability for the new license period. City Clerk/County Auditor are also required by M.S. 340A.404 S.3 to report any license cancellation. License Code ONSS License Period Ending ISSUING AUTHORITY Monticello Licensee Name Monticello Country Club Inc. Trade Name Monticello Country Club City, State, Zip Code * 1209 Golf Course Rd Business Phone License Fees: Off Sale Monticello 7632954653 $0.00 On Sale 6/30/2017 ID# 6356 MN 55362-0575 $3,750.00 Sunday $200.00 By signing this renewal application, applicant certifies that there has been no change in ownership on the above named licensee. For changes in ownership, the licensee named above, or for new licensees, full applications should be used. Si back of this application for further information needed to complete this renewal. Applicant's sienature on this renewal confirms the followine: Failure to report anv of the followine may result in civil penalties. 1. Licensee confirms it has no interest whatsoever, directly or indirectly in any other liquor establishments in Minnesota. If so, give details on back of this application. 2. Licensee confirms that it has never had a liquor license rejected by any city/township/county in the state of Minnesota. If ever rejected, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below. 3. Licensee confirms that for the past five years it has not had a liquor license revoked for any liquor law violation (state or local). If a revocation has occurred, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below. 4. Licensee confirms that during the past five years it or its employees have not been cited for any civil or criminal liquor law violations. If violations have occurred, please give details on back of this renewal, then sign below. 5. Licensee confirms that during the past license year, a summons has not been issued under the Liquor Liability Law (Dram Shop) MS 340A.802. If yes, attach a copy of the summons, then sign below. 6. Licensee confirms that Workers Compensation insurance will be kept in effect during the license period. Licensee has attached a liquor liability insurance certificate that corresponds with the license period in city/county where license is issued. $100,000 in cash or securities or $100,000 surety bond may be submitted in lieu of liquor liability. (3.2& liquor licenses are exempt if sales are less than $25,000 at on sale, or $50,000 at off sale). Licensee Signature DOB SS# Date (Signature certifies all above information to be correct and license has been approved by city/county.) City Clerk/County Auditor Signature Date (Signature certifies that renewal of a liquor, wine or club license has been approved by the city/county as stated above.) County Attorney Signature County Board issued licenses only(Signature certifies licensee is eligible for license). Date Police/Sheriff Signature Date Signature certifies licensee or associates have been checked for any state/local liquor law violations (criminal/civil) during the past five years. Report violations on back, then sign here. Minnesota Department of Public Safety Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement 445 Minnesota Street, Suite 222 Alcohel & Gambling Enfamemem St. Paul, MN 55101 651-201-7500 RENEWAL OF LIQUOR, WINE, CLUB OR 3.2 % LICENSES No license will be approve or released until the $20 Retailer ID Card fee is received by Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Licensee: Please verify your license information contained below. Make corrections if necessary and sign. City Clerk/County Auditor should submit this signed renewal with completed license and licensee liquor liability for the new license period. City Clerk/County Auditor are also required by M.S. 340A.404 S.3 to report any license cancellation. License Code ONSS License Period Ending 6/30/2017 ID# 18063 ISSUING AUTHORITY Monticello Licensee Name Rancho Grande Mex. Rest. Inc. #2 Trade Name Rancho Grande City, State, Zip Code 615 Locus Street Monticello MN 55362 Business Phone 6126167648 License Fees: Off Sale On Sale $3,750.00 Sunday $200.00 By signing this renewal application, applicant certifies that there has been no change in ownership on the above named licensee. For changes in ownership, the licensee named above, or for new licensees, full applications should be used. SI back of this application for further information needed to complete this renewal. Applicant's signature on this renewal confirms the following: Failure to report anv of the followine may result in civil penalties. 1. Licensee confirms it has no interest whatsoever, directly or indirectly in any other liquor establishments in Minnesota. If so, give details on back of this application. 2. Licensee confirms that it has never had a liquor license rejected by any city/township/county in the state of Minnesota. If ever rejected, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below. 3. Licensee confirms that for the past five years it has not had a liquor license revoked for any liquor law violation (state or local). If a revocation has occurred, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below. 4. Licensee confirms that during the past five years it or its employees have not been cited for any civil or criminal liquor law violations. If violations have occurred, please give details on back of this renewal, then sign below. 5. Licensee confirms that during the past license year, a summons has not been issued underthe Liquor Liability Law (Dram Shop) MS 340A.802. If yes, attach a copy of the summons, then sign below. 6. Licensee confirms that Workers Compensation insurance will be kept in effect during the license period. Licensee has attached a liquor liability insurance certificate that corresponds with the license period in city/county where license is issued. $100,000 in cash or securities or $100,000 surety bond may be submitted in lieu of liquor liability. (3.2& liquor licenses are exempt if sales are less than $25,000 at on sale, or $50,000 at off sale). Licensee Signature DOB SS# Date (Signature certifies all above information to be correct and license has been approved by city/county.) City Clerk/County Auditor Signature Date (Signature certifies that renewal of a liquor, wine or club license has been approved by the city/county as stated above.) County Attorney Signature County Board issued licenses only(Signature certifies licensee is eligible for license). Date Police/Sheriff Signature Date Signature certifies licensee or associates have been checked for any state/local liquor law violations (criminal/civil) during the past five years. Report violations on back, then sign here. Minnesota Department of Public Safety ' Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement 445 Minnesota Street, Suite 222 Alcohol & Gambling Enlorcemem St. Paul, MN 55101 651-201-7500 RENEWAL OF LIQUOR, WINE, CLUB OR 3.2% LICENSES No license will be approve or released until the $20 Retailer ID Card fee is received by Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Licensee: Please verify your license information contained below. Make corrections if necessary and sign. City Clerk/County Auditor should submit this signed renewal with completed license and licensee liquor liability for the new license period. City Clerk/County Auditor are also required by M.S. 340A.404 S.3 to report any license cancellation. License Code ONSS License Period Ending 6/30/2017 ID# 42745 ISSUING AUTHORITY Monticello Licensee Name River City Extreme Inc. Trade Name River City Extreme City, State, Zip Code 3875 School Blvd Monticello MN 55362 Business Phone 7632953390 License Fees: Off Sale $0.00 On Sale $3,750.00 Sunday $200.00 By signing this renewal application, applicant certifies that there has been no change in ownership on the above named licensee. For changes in ownership, the licensee named above, or for new licensees, full applications should be used. Si back of this application for further information needed to complete this renewal. Aanlicant's signature on this renewal confirms the following: Failure to report anv of the following may result in civil penalties. 1. Licensee confirms it has no interest whatsoever, directly or indirectly in any other liquor establishments in Minnesota. If so, give details on back of this application. 2. Licensee confirms that it has never had a liquor license rejected by any city/township/county in the state of Minnesota. If ever rejected, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below. 3. Licensee confirms that for the past five years it has not had a liquor license revoked for any liquor law violation (state or local). If a revocation has occurred, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below. 4. Licensee confirms that during the past five years it or its employees have not been cited for any civil or criminal liquor law violations. If violations have occurred, please give details on back of this renewal, then sign below. 5. Licensee confirms that during the past license year, a summons has not been issued under the Liquor Liability Law (Dram Shop) MS 340A.802. If yes, attach a copy of the summons, then sign below. 6. Licensee confirms that Workers Compensation insurance will be kept in effect during the license period. Licensee has attached a liquor liability insurance certificate that corresponds with the license period in city/county where license is issued. $100,000 in cash or securities or $100,000 surety bond may be submitted in lieu of liquor liability. (3.2& liquor licenses are exempt if sales are less than $25,000 at on sale, or $50,000 at off sale). Licensee Signature DOB SS# Date (Signature certifies all above information to be correct and license has been approved by city/county.) City Clerk/County Auditor Signature Date (Signature certifies that renewal of a liquor, wine or club license has been approved by the city/county as stated above.) County Attorney Signature County Board issued licenses only(Signature certifies licensee is eligible for license). Date Police/Sheriff Signature Date Signature certifies licensee or associates have been checked for any state/local liquor law violations (criminal/civil) during the past five years. Report violations on back, then sign here. Minnesota Department of Public Safety Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement 445 Minnesota Street, Suite 222 Alcohol & Gambling Enforcement St. Paul, MN 55101 651-201-7500 RENEWAL OF LIQUOR, WINE, CLUB OR 3.2% LICENSES No license will be approve or released until the $20 Retailer lD Card fee is received by Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Licensee: Please verify your license information contained below. Make corrections if necessary and sign. City Clerk/County Auditor should submit this signed renewal with completed license and licensee liquor liability for the new license period. City Clerk/County Auditor are also required by M.S. 340A.404 S.3 to report any license cancellation. License Code ONSS License Period Ending 6/30/2017 ID# 1145 ISSUING AUTHORITY Monticello Licensee Name VFW 8731 Trade Name Club Dorchester City, State, Zip Code 713 S Cedar St Monticello MN 55362 Business Phone 6122953792 License Fees: Off Sale $0.00 On Sale $3,750.00 Sunday $200.00 By signing this renewal application, applicant certifies that there has been no change in ownership on the above named licensee. For changes in ownership, the licensee named above, or for new licensees, full applications should be used. SI back of this application for further information needed to complete this renewal. Annlicant's signature on this renewal confirms the following: Failure to report anv of the following may result in civil uenalties. 1. Licensee confirms it has no interest whatsoever, directly or indirectly in any other liquor establishments in Minnesota. If so, give details on back of this application. 2. Licensee confirms that it has never had a liquor license rejected by any city/township/county in the state of Minnesota. If ever rejected, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below. 3. Licensee confirms that for the past five years it has not had a liquor license revoked for any liquor law violation (state or local). If a revocation has occurred, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below. 4. Licensee confirms that during the past five years it or its employees have not been cited for any civil or criminal liquor law violations. If violations have occurred, please give details on back of this renewal, then sign below. 5. Licensee confirms that during the past license year, a summons has not been issued under the Liquor Liability Law (Dram Shop) MS 340A.802. If yes, attach a copy of the summons, then sign below. 6. Licensee confirms that Workers Compensation insurance will be kept in effect during the license period. Licensee has attached a liquor liability insurance certificate that corresponds with the license period in city/county where license is issued. $100,000 in cash or securities or $100,000 surety bond may be submitted in lieu of liquor liability. (3.2& liquor licenses are exempt if sales are less than $25,000 at on sale, or $50,000 at off sale). Licensee Signature DOB SS# Date (Signature certifies all above information to be correct and license has been approved by city/county.) City Clerk/County Auditor Signature Date (Signature certifies that renewal of a liquor, wine or club license has been approved by the city/county as stated above.) County Attorney Signature County Board issued licenses only(Signature certifies licensee is eligible for license). Date Police/Sheriff Signature Date Signature certifies licensee or associates have been checked for any state/local liquor law violations (criminal/civil) during the past five years. Report violations on back, then sign here. Minnesota Department of Public Safety Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement 445 Minnesota Street, Suite 222 Alcohol &Gambling ErAorcemem St. Paul, MN 55 101 651-201-7500 RENEWAL OF LIQUOR, WINE, CLUB OR 3.2 % LICENSES No license will be approve or released until the $20 Retailer 1D Card fee is received by Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Licensee: Please verify your license information contained below. Make corrections if necessary and sign. City Clerk/County Auditor should submit this signed renewal with completed license and licensee liquor liability for the new license period. City Clerk/County Auditor are also required by M.S. 340A.404 S.3 to report any license cancellation. License Code MCLONSS License Period Ending 6/30/2017 ID# 1143 ISSUING AUTHORITY Monticello Licensee Name American Legion 260 Trade Name City, State, Zip Code 304 Elm St/Box 806 Monticello MN 55362 Business Phone License Fees: Off Sale 7632952574 $0.00 On Sale $500.00 Sunday $200.00 By signing this renewal application, applicant certifies that there has been no change in ownership on the above named licensee. For changes in ownership, the licensee named above, or for new licensees, full applications should be used. Si back of this application for further information needed to complete this renewal. Auglicant's signature on this renewal confirms the following: Failure to reuort anv of the following may result in civil penalties. 1. Licensee confirms it has no interest whatsoever, directly or indirectly in any other liquor establishments in Minnesota. If so, give details on back of this application. 2. Licensee confirms that it has never had a liquor license rejected by any city/township/county in the state of Minnesota. If ever rejected, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below. 3. Licensee confirms that for the past five years it has not had a liquor license revoked for any liquor law violation (state or local). If a revocation has occurred, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below. 4. Licensee confirms that during the past five years it or its employees have not been cited for any civil or criminal liquor law violations. If violations have occurred, please give details on back of this renewal, then sign below. 5. Licensee confirms that during the past license year, a summons has not been issued under the Liquor Liability Law (Dram Shop) MS 340A.802. If yes, attach a copy of the summons, then sign below. 6. Licensee confirms that Workers Compensation insurance will be kept in effect during the license period. Licensee has attached a liquor liability insurance certificate that corresponds with the license period in city/county where license is issued. $100,000 in cash or securities or $100,000 surety bond may be submitted in lieu of liquor liability. (3.2& liquor licenses are exempt if sales are less than $25,000 at on sale, or $50,000 at off sale). Licensee Signature DOB SS# Date (Signature certifies all above information to be correct and license has been approved by city/county.) City Clerk/County Auditor Signature Date ,Signature certifies that renewal of a liquor, wine or club license has been approved by the city/county as stated above.) County Attorney Signature County Board issued licenses only(Signature certifies licensee is eligible for license). Date 3olice/Sheriff Signature Date signature certifies licensee or associates have been checked for any state/local liquor law violations (criminal/civil) during the past five years. Report violations on back, then sign here. Minnesota Department of Public Safety Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement 445 Minnesota Street, Suite 222 &92 Aleohal&Gambling Enfomemem St. Paul, MN 55101 651-201-7500 RENEWAL OF LIQUOR, WINE, CLUB OR 3.2 % LICENSES No license will he approve or released until the $20 Retailer )D Card fee is received by Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Licensee: Please verify your license information contained below. Make corrections if necessary and sign. City Clerk/County Auditor should submit this signed renewal with completed license and licensee liquor liability for the new license period. City Clerk/County Auditor are also required by M.S. 340A.404 S.3 to report any license cancellation. License Code MWNONSB License Period Ending 6/30/2017 ID# 29481 ISSUING AUTHORITY Monticello Licensee Name Pauly Companies Inc. Trade Name Bluestone Grill City, State, Zip Code 9351 Cedar St Monticello MN 55362 Business Phone 7633140500 License Fees: Off Sale On Sale $1,200.00 Sunday $200.00 By signing this renewal application, applicant certifies that there has been no change in ownership on the above named licensee. For changes in ownership, the licensee named above, or for new licensees, full applications should be used. SI back of this application for further information needed to complete this renewal. Applicant's signature on this renewal confirms the following: Failure to report anv of the following may result in civil penalties. 1. Licensee confirms it has no interest whatsoever, directly or indirectly in any other liquor establishments in Minnesota. If so, give details on back of this application. 2. Licensee confirms that it has never had a liquor license rejected by any city/township/county in the state of Minnesota. If ever rejected, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below. 3. Licensee confirms that for the past five years it has not had a liquor license revoked for any liquor law violation (state or local). If a revocation has occurred, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below. 4. Licensee confirms that during the past five years it or its employees have not been cited for any civil or criminal liquor law violations. If violations have occurred, please give details on back of this renewal, then sign below. 5. Licensee confirms that during the past license year, a summons has not been issued under the Liquor Liability Law (Dram Shop) MS 340A.802. If yes, attach a copy of the summons, then sign below. 6. Licensee confirms that Workers Compensation insurance will be kept in effect during the license period. Licensee has attached a liquor liability insurance certificate that corresponds with the license period in city/county where license is issued. $100,000 in cash or securities or $100,000 surety bond may be submitted in lieu of liquor liability. (3.2& liquor licenses are exempt if sales are less than $25,000 at on sale, or $50,000 at off sale). Licensee Signature DOB SS# Date (Signature certifies all above information to be correct and license has been approved by city/county.) City Clerk/County Auditor Signature Date (Signature certifies that renewal of a liquor, wine or club license has been approved by the city/county as stated above.) County Attorney Signature County Board issued licenses only(Signature certifies licensee is eligible for license). Date Police/Sheriff Signature Date Signature certifies licensee or associates have been checked for any state/local liquor law violations (criminal/civil) during the past five years. Report violations on back, then sign here. Minnesota Department of Public Safety Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement 445 Minnesota Street, Suite 222 Alcohol & Gambling Enforcement St. Paul, MN 55101 651-201-7500 RENEWAL OF LIQUOR, WINE, CLUB OR 3.2% LICENSES No license will be approve or released until the $20 Retailer 1D Card fee is received by Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Licensee: Please verify your license information contained below. Make corrections if necessary and sign. City Clerk/County Auditor should submit this signed renewal with completed license and licensee liquor liability for the new license period. City Clerk/County Auditor are also required by M.S. 340A.404 S.3 to report any license cancellation. License Code 3.2ONSS License Period Ending 6/30/2017 ID# 33266 ISSUING AUTHORITY Monticello Licensee Name Pauly Companies Inc. Trade Name Bluestone Grill City, State, Zip Code 9351 Cedar St Monticello MN 55362 Business Phone 7633140500 License Fees: Off Sale On Sale $1.00 Sunday By signing this renewal application, applicant certifies that there has been no change in ownership on the above named licensee. For changes in ownership, the licensee named above, or for new licensees, full applications should be used. Si back of this application for further information needed to complete this renewal. Applicant's signature on this renewal confirms the following: Failure to report anv of the following may result in civil penalties. 1. Licensee confirms it has no interest whatsoever, directly or indirectly in any other liquor establishments in Minnesota. If so, give details on back of this application. 2. Licensee confirms that it has never had a liquor license rejected by any city/township/county in the state of Minnesota If ever rejected, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below. 3. Licensee confirms that for the past five years it has not had a liquor license revoked for any liquor law violation (state or local). If a revocation has occurred, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below. 4. Licensee confirms that during the past five years it or its employees have not been cited for any civil or criminal liquor law violations. If violations have occurred, please give details on back of this renewal, then sign below. 5. Licensee confirms that during the past license year, a summons has not been issued under the Liquor Liability Law (Dram Shop) MS 340A.802. If yes, attach a copy of the summons, then sign below. 6. Licensee confirms that Workers Compensation insurance will be kept in effect during the license period. Licensee has attached a liquor liability insurance certificate that corresponds with the license period in city/county where license is issued. $100,000 in cash or securities or $100,000 surety bond may be submitted in lieu of liquor liability. (3.2& liquor licenses are exempt if sales are less than $25,000 at on sale, or $50,000 at off sale). Licensee Signature DOB SS# Date (Signature certifies all above information to be correct and license has been approved by city/county.) City Clerk/County Auditor Signature Date (Signature certifies that renewal of a liquor, wine or club license has been approved by the city/county as stated above.) County Attorney Signature County Board issued licenses only(Signature certifies licensee is eligible for license). Date Police/Sheriff Signature Date Signature certifies licensee or associates have been checked for any state/local liquor law violations (criminal/civil) during the past five years. Report violations on back, then sign here. T innesota Department of Public Safety Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement 445 Minnesota Street, Suite 222 Alcohol & Gambling Enforcement St. Paul, MN 55101 651-201-7500 RENEWAL OF LIQUOR, WINE, CLUB OR 3.2 % LICENSES No license will be approve or released until the $20 Retailer ID Card fee is received by Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Licensee: Please verify your license information contained below. Make corrections if necessary and sign. City Clerk/County Auditor should submit this signed renewal with completed license and licensee liquor liability for the new license period. City Clerk/County Auditor are also required by M.S. 340A.404 S.3 to report any license cancellation. License Code 3.20NSS License Period Ending 6/30/2017 ID# 63861 ISSUING AUTHORITY Monticello Licensee Name Asian Cafe Sushi Grill Inc. Trade Name City, State, Zip Code 514 Pine St Monticello MN 55362 Business Phone 7632721509 License Fees: Off Sale On Sale Sunday By signing this renewal application, applicant certifies that there has been no change in ownership on the above named licensee. For changes in ownership, the licensee named above, or for new licensees, full applications should be used. Si back of this application for further information needed to complete this renewal. Applicant's signature on this renewal confirms the followine: Failure to report anv of the followinc may result in civil penalties. 1. Licensee confirms it has no interest whatsoever, directly or indirectly in any other liquor establishments in Minnesota. If so, give details on back of this application. 2. Licensee confirms that it has never had a liquor license rejected by any city/township/county in the state of Minnesota. If ever rejected, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below. 3. Licensee confirms that for the past five years it has not had a liquor license revoked for any liquor law violation (state or local). If a revocation has occurred, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below. 4. Licensee confirms that during the past five years it or its employees have not been cited for any civil or criminal liquor law violations. If violations have occurred, please give details on back of this renewal, then sign below. 5. Licensee confirms that during the past license year, a summons has not been issued under the Liquor Liability Law (Dram Shop) MS 340A.802. If yes, attach a copy of the summons, then sign below. 6. Licensee confirms that Workers Compensation insurance will be kept in effect during the license period. Licensee has attached a liquor liability insurance certificate that corresponds with the license period in city/county where license is issued. $100,000 in cash or securities or $100,000 surety bond may be submitted in lieu of liquor liability. (3.2& liquor licenses are exempt if sales are less than $25,000 at on sale, or $50,000 at off sale). Licensee Signature DOB SS# Date (Signature certifies all above information to be correct and license has been approved by city/county.) City Clerk/County Auditor Signature Date (Signature certifies that renewal of a liquor, wine or club license has been approved by the city/county as stated above.) County Attorney Signature County Board issued licenses only(Signature certifies licensee is eligible for license). Date Police/Sheriff Signature Date Signature certifies licensee or associates have been checked for any state/local liquor law violations (criminal/civil) during the past five years. Report violations on back, then sign here. A innesota Department of Public Safety Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement 445 Minnesota Street, Suite 222 Alcatml & Gambling Enforcement. St. Paul, MN 55 101 651-201-7500 RENEWAL OF LIQUOR, WINE, CLUB OR 3.2% LICENSES No license will be approve or released until the $20 Retailer 1D Card fee is received by Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Licensee: Please verify your license information contained below. Make corrections if necessary and sign. City Clerk/County Auditor should submit this signed renewal with completed license and licensee liquor liability for the new license period. City Clerk/County Auditor are also required by M.S. 340A.404 S.3 to report any license cancellation. License Code MWNONSB License Period Ending 6/30/2017 )D# 63860 ISSUING AUTHORITY Monticello Licensee Name Asian Cafe Sushi Grill Inc. Trade Name City, State, Zip Code 514 Pine St Monticello MN 55362 Business Phone 7632721509 License Fees: Off Sale On Sale $250.00 Sunday By signing this renewal application, applicant certifies that there has been no change in ownership on the above named licensee. For changes in ownership, the licensee named above, or for new licensees, full applications should be used. SI back of this application for further information needed to complete this renewal. Applicant's signature on this renewal confirms the following: Failure to report anv of the followine may result in civil penalties. 1. Licensee confirms it has no interest whatsoever, directly or indirectly in any other liquor establishments in Minnesota. If so, give details on back of this application. 2. Licensee confirms that it has never had a liquor license rejected by any city/township/county in the state of Minnesota. If ever rejected, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below. 3. Licensee confirms that for the past five years it has not had a liquor license revoked for any liquor law violation (state or local). If a revocation has occurred, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below. 4. Licensee confirms that during the past five years it or its employees have not been cited for any civil or criminal liquor law violations. If violations have occurred, please give details on back of this renewal, then sign below. 5. Licensee confirms that during the past license year, a summons has not been issued under the Liquor Liability Law (Dram Shop) MS 340A.802. If yes, attach a copy of the summons, then sign below. 6. Licensee confirms that Workers Compensation insurance will be kept in effect during the license period. Licensee has attached a liquor liability insurance certificate that corresponds with the license period in city/county where license is issued. $100,000 in cash or securities or $100,000 surety bond may be submitted in lieu of liquor liability. (3.2& liquor licenses are exempt if sales are less than $25,000 at on sale, or $50,000 at off sale). Licensee Signature DOB SS# Date (Signature certifies all above information to be correct and license has been approved by city/county.) City Clerk/County Auditor Signature Date (Signature certifies that renewal of a liquor, wine or club license has been approved by the city/county as stated above.) County Attorney Signature County Board issued licenses only(Signature certifies licensee is eligible for license). Date Police/Sheriff Signature Date Signature certifies licensee or associates have been checked for any state/local liquor law violations (criminal/civil) during the past five years. Report violations on back, then sign here. Minnesota Department of Public Safety ® Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement 445 Minnesota Street, Suite 222 Alcalml & Gambling Enlarcement St. Paul, MN 55 101 651-201-7500 RENEWAL OF LIQUOR, WINE, CLUB OR 3.2% LICENSES No license will be approve or released until the $20 Retailer ID Card fee is received by Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Licensee: Please verify your license information contained below. Make corrections if necessary and sign. City Clerk/County Auditor should submit this signed renewal with completed license and licensee liquor liability for the new license period. City Clerk/County Auditor are also required by M.S. 340A.404 S.3 to report any license cancellation. License Code 3.20NSS License Period Ending 6/30/2017 ID# 15553 ISSUING AUTHORITY Monticello Licensee Name Lin, Chuan Trade Name China Buffet p 0 City, State, Zip Code �3'1"1 Cedar Street Monticello MN 55362 Business Phone 7632958300 License Fees: Off Sale On Sale $275.00 Sunday By signing this renewal application, applicant certifies that there has been no change in ownership on the above named licensee. For changes in ownership, the licensee named above, or for new licensees, full applications should be used. S4 back of this application for further information needed to complete this renewal. Applicant's sienature on this renewal confirms the following: Failure to renort anv of the following may result in civil penalties. 1. Licensee confirms it has no interest whatsoever, directly or indirectly in any other liquor establishments in Minnesota. If so, give details m back of this application. 2. Licensee confirms that it has never had a liquor license rejected by any city/township/county in the state of Minnesota. If ever rejected, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below. 3. Licensee confirms that for the past five years it has not had a liquor license revoked for any liquor law violation (state or local). If a revocation has occurred, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below. 4. Licensee confirms that during the past five years it or its employees have not been cited for any civil or criminal liquor law violations. If violations have occurred, please give details on back of this renewal, then sign below. 5. Licensee confirms that during the past license year, a summons has not been issued under the Liquor Liability Law (Dram Shop) MS 340A.802. If yes, attach a copy of the summons, then sign below. 6. Licensee confirms that Workers Compensation insurance will be kept in effect during the license period. Licensee has attached a liquor liability insurance certificate that corresponds with the license period in city/county where license is issued. $100,000 in cash or securities or $100,000 surety bond may be submitted in Neu of liquor liability. (3.2& liquor licenses are exempt if sales are less than $25,000 at on sale, or $50,000 at off sale). Licensee Signature DOB SS# Date (Signature certifies all above information to be correct and license has been approved by city/county.) City Clerk/County Auditor Signature Date (Signature certifies that renewal of a liquor, wine or club license has been approved by the city/county as stated above.) County Attorney Signature County Board issued licenses only(Signature certifies licensee is eligible for license). Date Police/Sheriff Signature Date Signature certifies licensee or associates have been checked for any state/local liquor law violations (criminal/civil) during the past five years. Report violations on back, then sign here. Minnesota Department of Public Safety t Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement 445 Minnesota Street, Suite 222 Alcohol & Gambling Enioicemem St. Paul, MN 55101 651-201-7500 RENEWAL OF LIQUOR, WINE, CLUB OR 3.2% LICENSES No license will be approve or released until the $20 Retailer ID Card fee is received by Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Licensee: Please verify your license information contained below. Make corrections if necessary and sign. City Clerk/County Auditor should submit this signed renewal with completed license and licensee liquor liability for the new license period. City Clerk/County Auditor are also required by M.S. 340A.404 S.3 to report any license cancellation. License Code 3.2ONSS License Period Ending 6/30/2017 ID# 22952 ISSUING AUTHORITY Monticello Licensee Name City of Monticello Trade Name Monticello Community Center City, State, Zip Code 2175 W River St Monticello MN 55362 Business Phone 7632713268 License Fees: Off Sale On Sale $137.00 Sunday By signing this renewal application, applicant certifies that there has been no change in ownership on the above named licensee. For changes in ownership, the licensee named above, or for new licensees, full applications should be used. SI back of this application for further information needed to complete this renewal. Applicant's siLynature on this renewal confirms the following: Failure to report anv of the followine may result in civil penalties. 1. Licensee confirms it has no interest whatsoever, directly or indirectly in any other liquor establishments in Minnesota. If so, give details on back of this application. 2. Licensee confirms that it has never had a liquor license rejected by any city/township/county in the state of Minnesota If ever rejected, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below. 3. Licensee confirms that for the past five years it has not had a liquor license revoked for any liquor law violation (state or local). If a revocation has occurred, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below. 4. Licensee confirms that during the past five years it or its employees have not been cited for any civil or criminal liquor law violations. If violations have occurred, please give details on back of this renewal, then sign below. 5. Licensee confirms that during the past license year, a summons has not been issued under the Liquor Liability Law (Dram Shop) MS 340A.802. If yes, attach a copy of the summons, then sign below. 6. Licensee confirms that Workers Compensation insurance will be kept in effect during the license period. Licensee has attached a liquor liability insurance certificate that corresponds with the license period in city/county where license is issued. $100,000 in cash or securities or $100,000 surety bond may be submitted in lieu of liquor liability. (3.2& liquor licenses are exempt if sales are less than $25,000 at on sale, or $50,000 at off sale). Licensee Signature DOB SS# Date (Signature certifies all above information to be correct and license has been approved by city/county.) City Clerk/CountyAuditor Signature Date (Signature certifies that renewal of a liquor, wine or club license has been approved by the city/county as stated above.) County Attorney Signature County Board issued licenses only(Signature certifies licensee is eligible for license). Date Police/Sheriff Signature Date Signature certifies licensee or associates have been checked for any state/local liquor law violations (criminal/civil) during the past five years. Report violations on back, then sign here. 1VIinnesota Department of Public Safety Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement 445 Minnesota Street, Suite 222 Alcohol & Gambling Eufmcement St. Paul, MN 55101 651-201-7500 RENEWAL OF LIQUOR, WINE, CLUB OR 3.2% LICENSES No license will be approve or released until the $20 Retailer 1D Card fee is received by Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Licensee: Please verify your license information contained below. Make corrections if necessary and sign. City Clerk/County Auditor should submit this signed renewal with completed license and licensee liquor liability for the new license period. City Clerk/County Auditor are also required by M.S. 340A.404 S.3 to report any license cancellation. License Code 3.2OFSL License Period Ending 6/30/2017 I[U# 15558 ISSUING AUTHORITY Monticello Licensee Name Monticello 1998 LLC Trade Name Cub Foods City, State, Zip Code 216 7th Street Monticello MN 55362 Business Phone License Fees: Off Sale 7632716800 $100.00 On Sale Sunday By signing this renewal application, applicant certifies that there has been no change in ownership on the above named licensee. For changes in ownership, the licensee named above, or for new licensees, full applications should be used. SI back of this application for further information needed to complete this renewal. Annlicant's signature on this renewal confirms the following: Failure to report anv of the following may result in civil aenalties. 1. Licensee confirms it has no interest whatsoever, directly or indirectly in any other liquor establishments in Minnesota. If so, give details on back of this application. 2. Licensee confirms that it has never had a liquor license rejected by any city/township/county in the state of Minnesota If ever rejected, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below. 3. Licensee confirms that for the past five years it has not had a liquor license revoked for any liquor law violation (state or local). If a revocation has occurred, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below. 4. Licensee confirms that during the past five years it or its employees have not been cited for any civil or criminal liquor law violations. If violations have occurred, please give details on back of this renewal, then sign below. 5. Licensee confirms that during the past license year, a summons has not been issued under the Liquor Liability Law (Dram Shop) MS 340A.802. If yes, attach a copy of the summons, then sign below. 6. Licensee confirms that Workers Compensation insurance will be kept in effect during the license period. Licensee has attached a liquor liability insurance certificate that corresponds with the license period in city/county where license is issued. $100,000 in cash or securities or $100,000 surety bond may be submitted in lieu of liquor liability. (3.2& liquor licenses are exempt if sales are less than $25,000 at on sale, or $50,000 at off sale). Licensee Signature DOB SS# Date (Signature certifies all above information to be correct and license has been approved by city/county.) City Clerk/County Auditor Signature Date (Signature certifies that renewal of a liquor, wine or club license has been approved by the city/county as stated above.) County Attorney Signature County Board issued licenses only(Signature certifies licensee is eligible for license). Date Police/Sheriff Signature Date Signature certifies licensee or associates have been checked for any state/local liquor law violations (criminal/civil) during the past five years. Report violations on back, then sign here. Minnesota Department of Public Safety 6Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement 936,10 AM 445 Minnesota Street, Suite 222 Alcohol & Gambling Etdomsement St. Paul, MN 55101 651-201-7500 RENEWAL OF LIQUOR, WINE, CLUB OR 3.2% LICENSES No license will be approve or released until the $20 Retailer 1D Card fee is received by Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Licensee: Please verify your license information contained below. Make corrections if necessary and sign. City Clerk/County Auditor should submit this signed renewal with completed license and licensee liquor liability for the new license period. City Clerk/County Auditor are also required by M.S. 340A.404 S.3 to report any license cancellation. License Code 3.20FSL License Period Ending 6/30/2017 ID# 29008 ISSUING AUTHORITY Monticello Licensee Name Kwik Trip Inc. Trade Name Kwik Trip 4345 City, State, Zip Code 9440 State Hwy 25 Monticello MN 55362 Business Phone License Fees: Off Sale 7632958857 $100.00 On Sale Sunday By signing this renewal application, applicant certifies that there has been no change in ownership on the above named licensee. For changes in ownership, the licensee named above, or for new licensees, full applications should be used. Si back of this application for further information needed to complete this renewal. Aunlicant's sisnature on this renewal confirms the followimn Failure to report anv of the followine may result in civil aenalties. 1. Licensee confirms it has no interest whatsoever, directly or indirectly in any other liquor establishments in Minnesota. If so, give details on back of this application. 2. Licensee confirms that it has never had a liquor license rejected by any city/township/county in the state of Minnesota If ever rejected, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below. 3. Licensee confirms that for the past five years it has not had a liquor license revoked for any liquor law violation (state or local). If a revocation has occurred, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below. 4. Licensee confirms that during the past five years it or its employees have not been cited for any civil or criminal liquor law violations. If violations have occurred, please give details on back of this renewal, then sign below. 5. Licensee confirms that during the past license year, a summons has not been issued under the Liquor Liability Law (Dram Shop) MS 340A.802. If yes, attach a copy of the summons, then sign below. 6. Licensee confirms that Workers Compensation insurance will be kept in effect during the license period. Licensee has attached a liquor liability insurance certificate that corresponds with the license period in city/county where license is issued. $100,000 in cash or securities or $100,000 surety bond may be submitted in lieu of liquor liability. (3.2& liquor licenses are exempt if sales are less than $25,000 at on sale, or $50,000 at off sale). Licensee Signature DOB SS# Date (Signature certifies all above information to be correct and license has been approved by city/county.) City Clerk/County Auditor Signature Date (Signature certifies that renewal of a liquor, wine or club license has been approved by the city/county as stated above.) County Attorney Signature County Board issued licenses only(Signature certifies licensee is eligible for license). Date Police/Sheriff Signature Date Signature certifies licensee or associates have been checked for any state/local liquor law violations (criminal/civil) during the past five years. Report violations on back, then sign here. Minnesota Department of Public Safety Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement EEO 445 Minnesota Street, Suite 222 Alcohol & Gambling Eirforcement St. Paul, MN 55101 651-201-7500 RENEWAL OF LIQUOR, WINE, CLUB OR 3.2 % LICENSES No license will be approve or released until the $20 Retailer ID Card fee is received by Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Licensee: Please verify your license information contained below. Make corrections if necessary and sign. City Clerk/County Auditor should submit this signed renewal with completed license and licensee liquor liability for the new license period. City Clerk/County Auditor are also required by M.S. 340A.404 S.3 to report any license cancellation. License Code 3.20FSL License Period Ending 6/30/2017 ID# 46003 ISSUING AUTHORITY Monticello Licensee Name Kwik Trip Inc. Trade Name Kwik Trip # 177 City, State, Zip Code 9855 Hart Blvd Monticello MN 55362 Business Phone License Fees: Off Sale $100.00 On Sale Sunday By signing this renewal application, applicant certifies that there has been no change in ownership on the above named licensee. For changes in ownership, the licensee named above, or for new licensees, full applications should be used. Sl back of this application for further information needed to complete this renewal. Auplicant's sienature on this renewal confirms the followine: Failure to resort anv of the followine may result in civil penalties. 1. Licensee confirms it has no interest whatsoever, directly or indirectly in any other liquor establishments in Minnesota. If so, give details on back of this application. 2. Licensee confirms that it has never had a liquor license rejected by any city/township/county in the state of Minnesota. If ever rejected, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below. 3. Licensee confirms that for the past five years it has not had a liquor license revoked for any liquor law violation (state or local). If a revocation has occurred, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below. 4. Licensee confirms that during the past five years it or its employees have not been cited for any civil or criminal liquor law violations. If violations have occurred, please give details on back of this renewal, then sign below. 5. Licensee confirms that during the past license year, a summons has not been issued under the Liquor Liability Law (Dram Shop) MS 340A.802. If yes, attach a copy of the summons, then sign below. 6. Licensee confirms that Workers Compensation insurance will be kept in effect during the license period. Licensee has attached a liquor liability insurance certificate that corresponds with the license period in city/county where license is issued. $100,000 in cash or securities or $100,000 surety bond may be submitted in lieu of liquor liability. (3.2& liquor licenses are exempt if sales are less than $25,000 at on sale, or $50,000 at off sale). Licensee Signature DOB SS# Date (Signature certifies all above information to be correct and license has been approved by city/county.) City Clerk/County Auditor Signature Date (Signature certifies that renewal of a liquor, wine or club license has been approved by the city/county as stated above.) County Attorney Signature County Board issued licenses only(Signature certifies licensee is eligible for license). Date Police/Sheriff Signature Date Signature certifies licensee or associates have been checked for any state/local liquor law violations (criminal/ civil) during the past five years. Report violations on back, then sign here. Minnesota Department of Public Safety Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement t 445 Minnesota Street, Suite 222 Alcohol & Gambling Enforcement St. Paul, MN 55101 651-201-7500 RENEWAL OF LIQUOR, WINE, CLUB OR 3.2 % LICENSES No license will be approve or released until the $20 Retailer ID Card fee is received by Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Licensee: Please verify your license information contained below. Make corrections if necessary and sign. City Clerk/County Auditor should submit this signed renewal with completed license and licensee liquor liability for the new license period. City Clerk/County Auditor are also required by M.S. 340A.404 S.3 to report any license cancellation. License Code 3.20FSL License Period Ending 6/30/2017 ID# 15560 ISSUING AUTHORITY Monticello Licensee Name Northern Tier Retail LLC Trade Name SuperAmerica 44479 City, State, Zip Code 109 Oakwood Dr Monticello MN 55362 Business Phone License Fees: Off Sale 7632950444 $100.00 On Sale Sunday By signing this renewal application, applicant certifies that there has been no change in ownership on the above named licensee. For changes in ownership, the licensee named above, or for new licensees, full applications should be used. So back of this application for further information needed to complete this renewal. Applicant's signature on this renewal confirms the followine: Failure to report anv of the followim may result in civil nenalties. 1. Licensee confirms it has no interest whatsoever, directly or indirectly in any other liquor establishments in Minnesota. If so, give details on back of this application. 2. Licensee confirms that it has never had a liquor license rejected by any city/township/county in the state of Minnesota If ever rejected, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below. 3. Licensee confirms that for the past five years it has not had a liquor license revoked for any liquor law violation (state or local). If a revocation has occurred, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below. 4. Licensee confirms that during the past five years it or its employees have not been cited for any civil or criminal liquor law violations. If violations have occurred, please give details on back of this renewal, then sign below. 5. Licensee confirms that during the past license year, a summons has not been issued under the Liquor Liability Law (Dram Shop) MS 340A.802. If yes, attach a copy of the summons, then sign below. 6. Licensee confirms that Workers Compensation insurance will be kept in effect during the license period. Licensee has attached a liquor liability insurance certificate that corresponds with the license period in city/county where license is issued. $100,000 in cash or securities or $100,000 surety bond may be submitted in lieu of liquor liability. (3.2& liquor licenses are exempt if sales are less than $25,000 at on sale, or $50,000 at off sale). Licensee Signature DOB SS# Date (Signature certifies all above information to be correct and license has been approved by city/county.) City Clerk/County Auditor Signature Date (Signature certifies that renewal of a liquor, wine or club license has been approved by the city/county as stated above.) County Attorney Signature County Board issued licenses only(Signature certifies licensee is eligible for license). Date Police/Sheriff Signature Date Signature certifies licensee or associates have been checked for any state/local liquor law violations (criminal/civil) during the past five years. Report violations on back, then sign here. Minnesota Department of Public Safety r Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement 445 Minnesota Street, Suite 222 Alcohol & Gambling Enforcement St. Paul, MN 55101 651-201-7500 RENEWAL OF LIQUOR, WINE, CLUB OR 3.2% LICENSES No license will be approve or released until the $20 Retailer ID Card fee is received by Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Licensee: Please verify your license information contained below. Make corrections if necessary and sign. City Clerk/County Auditor should submit this signed renewal with completed license and licensee liquor liability for the new license period. City Clerk/County Auditor are also required by M.S. 340A.404 S.3 to report any license cancellation. License Code 3.2OFSL License Period Ending 6/30/2017 ID# 22126 ISSUING AUTHORITY Monticello Licensee Name Target Corporation Trade Name Target Store T-2180 City, State, Zip Code 1447 E 7th Street Monticello MN 55362 Business Phone License Fees: Off Sale 7632711100 $100.00 On Sale Sunday By signing this renewal application, applicant certifies that there has been no change in ownership on the above named licensee. For changes in ownership, the licensee named above, or for new licensees, full applications should be used. SI back of this application for further information needed to complete this renewal. Applicant's signature on this renewal confirms the followine: Failure to report anv of the following may result in civil aenalties. 1. Licensee confirms it has no interest whatsoever, directly or indirectly in any other liquor establishments in Minnesota. If so, give details on back of this application. 2. Licensee confirms that it has never had a liquor license rejected by any city/township/county in the state of Minnesota If ever rejected, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below. 3. Licensee confirms that for the past five years it has not had a liquor license revoked for any liquor law violation (state or local). If a revocation has occurred, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below. 4. Licensee confirms that during the past five years it or its employees have not been cited for any civil or criminal liquor law violations. If violations have occurred, please give details on back of this renewal, then sign below. 5. Licensee confirms that during the past license year, a summons has not been issued under the Liquor Liability Law (Dram Shop) MS 340A.802. If yes, attach a copy of the summons, then sign below. 6. Licensee confirms that Workers Compensation insurance will be kept in effect during the license period. Licensee has attached a liquor liability insurance certificate that corresponds with the license period in city/county where license is issued. $100,000 in cash or securities or $100,000 surety bond may be submitted in lieu of liquor liability. (3.2& liquor licenses are exempt if sales are less than $25,000 at on sale, or $50,000 at off sale). Licensee Signature DOB SS# Date (Signature certifies all above information to be correct and license has been approved by city/county.) City Clerk/County Auditor Signature Date (Signature certifies that renewal of a liquor, wine or club license has been approved by the city/county as stated above.) County Attorney Signature County Board issued licenses only(Signature certifies licensee is eligible for license). Date Police/Sheriff Signature Date Signature certifies licensee or associates have been checked for any state/local liquor law violations (criminal/civil) during the past five years. Report violations on back, then sign here. Minnesota Department of Public Safety Iff Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement 445 Minnesota Street, Suite 222 Alcohol & Gambling EnfoASI;rcement 651-201-7500 Paul, MN 55101 651-201-7500 RENEWAL OF LIQUOR, WINE, CLUB OR 3.2 % LICENSES No license will be approve or released until the $20 Retailer 1D Card fee is received by Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Licensee: Please verify your license information contained below. Make corrections if necessary and sign. City Clerk/County Auditor should submit this signed renewal with completed license and licensee liquor liability for the new license period. City Clerk/County Auditor are also required by M.S. 340A.404 S.3 to report any license cancellation. License Code 3.20FSL License Period Ending 6/30/2017 ID# 19139 ISSUING AUTHORITY Monticello Licensee Name Wal-Mart Stores Inc. Trade Name Wal-Mart Supercenter #3624 City, State, Zip Code 9320 Cedar Street Monticello MN 55362 Business Phone License Fees: Off Sale 7632959800 $100.00 On Sale Sunday By signing this renewal application, applicant certifies that there has been no change in ownership on the above named licensee. For changes in ownership, the licensee named above, or for new licensees, full applications should be used. Si back of this application for further information needed to complete this renewal. Applicant's sienature on this renewal confirms the followiney: Failure to report anv of the following may result in civil penalties. 1. Licensee confirms it has no interest whatsoever, directly or indirectly in any other liquor establishments in Minnesota. If so, give details on back of this application. 2. Licensee confirms that it has never had a liquor license rejected by any city/township/county in the state of Minnesota. If ever rejected, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below. 3. Licensee confirms that for the past five years it has not had a liquor license revoked for any liquor law violation (state or local). If a revocation has occurred, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below. 4. Licensee confirms that during the past five years it or its employees have not been cited for any civil or criminal liquor law violations. If violations have occurred, please give details on back of this renewal, then sign below. 5. Licensee confirms that during the past license year, a summons has not been issued under the Liquor Liability Law (Dram Shop) MS 340A.802. If yes, attach a copy of the summons, then sign below. 6. Licensee confirms that Workers Compensation insurance will be kept in effect during the license period. Licensee has attached a liquor liability insurance certificate that corresponds with the license period in city/county where license is issued. $100,000 in cash or securities or $100,000 surety bond may be submitted in lieu of liquor liability. (3.2& liquor licenses are exempt if sales are less than $25,000 at on sale, or $50,000 at off sale). Licensee Signature DOB SS# Date (Signature certifies all above information to be correct and license has been approved by city/county.) City Clerk/County Auditor Signature Date (Signature certifies that renewal of a liquor, wine or club license has been approved by the city/county as stated above.) County Attorney Signature County Board issued licenses only(Signature certifies licensee is eligible for license). Date Police/Sheriff Signature Date Signature certifies licensee or associates have been checked for any state/local liquor law violations (criminal/civil) during the past five years. Report violations on back, then sign here. City Council Agenda: 6/26/17 2I. Consideration of approving the Finance Manager to attend 2017 Accela Finance and Administration National Training in Portland, OR on 7/19/17 through 7/20/17 at an estimated cost of $1,750. (SR) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: City Council is asked to consider approving the Finance Manager's attendance at the upcoming 2017 Accela Finance and Administration National Training in Portland, OR on July I 91 & 20th. The current City policy allows for out-of-state training for the City Administrator and Department Heads upon approval of the City Council. The Personnel Committee recently met to discuss this request and based on the information provided recommends approval of attendance. Al. Budget Impact: The estimated cost of attendance is $1,750 including roundtrip airfare ($500), hotel for 2 nights ($650), conference fee ($500), meals for 3 dinners ($75), and ground transportation in Portland ($25). This training was not specifically budgeted for in 2017, but there are funds available in the Finance department's travel and training budget for this conference. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS 1. Motion to approve the Finance Manager to attend the 2017 Accela Finance and Administration National Training in Portland, OR on 7/19/17 through 7/20/17 at an estimated cost of $1,750. 2. Motion to deny the Finance Manager from attending the 2017 Accela Finance and Administration National Training in Portland, OR on 7/19/17 through 7/20/17 at an estimated cost of $1,750. B. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative #1. The item was recommended for approval by the Personnel Committee. C. SUPPORTING DATA: A. 2017 Accela Finance and Administration National Training Agenda B. Personnel Policy Relating to Out -of -State Training • Portland, OR E Accela F: Finance P: Payroll S: Systemwide UB: Utility Billing 8:00 AM - 9:00 AM Registration and Breakfast 9:00 AM -10:00 AM Company Update and O&A 10:00 AM -11:00 AM Product Roadmap 11:00 AM -11:45 AM Networking 11:45 AM - 12:30 PM Lunch Room 1 12:30 PM - 1:20 PM F: Budgeting (Basic) Instr: Marti Moore 1:30 PM - 2:20 PM S: Cash Receipts for Managers Instrs: Carol Almer, Carolyn Towle Room 2 S: Preparing for Audit Instr: Carolyn Towle UB: Online-bills.com Instr: Valerie Lenk Room 3 S: Systems and Security Instr: Carol Almer S: Becoming a Power User (Basic) Instr: Marti Moore 2:30 PM - 3:20 PM F: UB: P: General Ledger Account Management and Payroll Time Entry Instr: Carol Almer Service Requests Instr: Carolyn Towle Instr: Valerie Lenk 3:30 PM - 4:20 PM F: UB: F: Reporting Tools (Basic) New Features Procurement Instr: Carol Almer Instr: Valerie Lenk Instr: Marti Moore 4:45 PM - 6:30 PM Happy Hour at Accela Portland Office 1000 Broadway Suite 1900, Portland, OR 97205 Each class qualifies as 1 CPE credit. Three classes will be offered during each 50 minute session. The categories are Utility Billing (UB), Finance (F), Payroll (P) and Systemwide (S). There are no prerequisites for classes, however the suggested skill level is listed next to the class name where applicable. E Acce la 2 8:00 AM - 9:00 AM Breakfast Room 1 Room 2 Room 3 8:30 AM - 9:20 AM F: UB: S: Fixed Assets Meter Management Becoming a Power User Instr: Marti Moore Instr: Valerie Lenk (Advanced) Instr: Carol Almer 9:30 AM - 10:20 AM F: UB: F: Fixed Assets Billing Reports Instr: Marti Moore Instr: Valerie Lenk Instr: Carol Almer 10:30 AM -11:20 AM S: UB: S: Internal Controls Adjustments Customer Information Instr: Carolyn Towle Instr: Valerie Lenk, Systems Modules Amanda Babajan, Instr: Carol Almer 11:20 AM - 12:30 PM Lunch 12:30 PM -1:20 PM UB: UB: P: Past Dues Reporting Payroll Computer Checks Instr: Valerie Lenk Instr: Carol Almer, Instr: Carolyn Towle Amanda Babajan 1:30 PM - 2:20 PM UB: Balancing UB to GL Instrs: Valerie Lenk, Carol Almer 2:30 PM -3:20 PM F: Budgeting (Advanced) Instr: Marti Moore UB: Online Payments for Utility Billing, Business Tax and Business Licenses Instrs: Amanda Babajan, Ken Hoffmann F: Reporting Tools (Advanced) Instr: Carol Almer P: Payroll Processes Instr: Carolyn Towle P: Payroll Tools (Advanced) Instr: Carolyn Towle Each class qualifies as 1 CPE credit. Three classes will be offered during each 50 minute session. The categories are Utility Billing (UB), Finance (F), Payroll (P) and Systemwide (S). There are no prerequisites for classes, however the suggested skill level is listed next to the class name where applicable. E Acce la 3 Finance (F) Budgeting (Basic) Budgeting is something everyone has to do. Let our software help your organization make budgeting easy. See some of the new features in the applications, such as Budget Groups, which support multi-year budgets and position budgeting. Budgeting (Advanced) Are you ready for even more information on Advanced Budgeting? This class will provide an in-depth view of the advanced features available in extended budgeting. Attendees will learn about budget administration/selection, creating roles to limit user views, editing GL account budgets, export and import options, committing the budget, and utilities such as copying revisions, copying entries, generating trend analysis and online budget display. Fixed Assets Do you only use Fixed Assets once a year just to book your depreciation? Take a more in-depth look at Fixed Assets and other features it has to offer, learn about changes made in recent versions that affect calculation of life and value, and preview upcoming new features. New to Fixed Assets or evaluating adding the module? Learn about the import process and how it works. General Ledger The beating heart of all government agencies. See how to manage your general ledger accounts, provide access to non -finance employees, journal entry tips and more. Procurement This class will cover the procurement process from purchase orders through sending checks to vendors, as well as requisitions and reporting. Reports Are you getting all that you can from the reports in your Accela Software? Join us for a class on reporting and the different reporting tools the General Ledger has to offer. Reporting Tools (Basic) Reporting is a critical part of any organization. This is a two-part class to cover the various methods of reporting across the application. The first part will focus on standard reports, formats, publishing and QBE. Reporting Tools (Advanced) This is an advanced class that will focus on finance reporting tools such as Query Manager and VRI. E Accela 4 Payroll (P) Payroll Computer Checks Welcome to check processing A -Z. This class will include best practices, off period checks, special checks, cycles and split periods. Payroll Processes Take a more in-depth look at Payroll. See how to use advanced features like Retro -pay and Manual Checks for making payroll corrections. We will also review the configurable check option, to provide flexibility and meet new reporting requirements for Oregon and California. We will also take a tour of payroll reports. Payroll Time Entry This class will address general short cuts and tips, and demonstrate how employees can center time directions into the application and the timesheet approval process. One of the newest features in Payroll is the ability to enter timecards from a configurable import via Excel. We will also cover how to publish reports for pay period or quarterly reporting. Payroll Tools (Advanced) Learn more about the functionality of the Payroll Employee Wizard and the seamless entry of new employees. Learn to use the COLA Batch process and Pay Adjustments, and understand how the HR Module interfaces with Payroll. There will be an overview of Position Control, Plan Templates and PAF Workflows for electronic approvals. Systemwide (S) Becoming a Power User (Basic) Are you ready to take your skills to the next level? Here's your chance to become a Finance and Administration Power User! In this series of classes we will cover the application -wide features and processes that every Accela user should master. This first session will cover general application settings controlled through the User Preferences window and will provide a detailed investigation of Accela data grids. Becoming a Power User (Advanced) The second class in this series will cover more advanced application features. These include configurable forms, published reports, batch naming, sharing forms and reports via e-mail. E Accela 5 Systemwide (S) - continued Cash Receipts for Managers If you manage staff that receives cash, you have special concerns. Security and control are paramount but so are processes, reports, and even hardware concerns like receipt printers and cash drawers. This session covers CR managerial topics without getting bogged down in the processing details. You'll learn how to set things up to be safe, secure and efficient. Customer Information Systems Modules This class provides an overview of Accounts Receivable, Business Tax, Licenses and Permits, Special Assessments and Parking Ticket modules. Will provide time for questions and discussion of how the modules can be used most efficiently. Internal Controls Developing and following strong internal controls can be difficult. How much control is necessary? How much is too much? This session will cover the current best practices for internal controls with a focus on how to implement them in Accela. Preparing for Audit Audits are a necessary part of a finance officer's duty. This class will walk you through tips on how to prepare for audits and tools that are available in the Accela application. Systems and Security This class covers the various details and considerations every Finance and Administration Administrator should evaluate before setting up security privileges for their organization. Utility Billing (UB) Account Management and Service Requests Signing up a new customer for service is more than just keying in a name and address. There are a lot of details and considerations, like verifying identity and ensuring service is turned on at the right time. Learn strategies for efficient management of customer accounts and service orders. Adjustments Whether it's a meter misread, a returned payment, or a forgiven penalty, we have the tools to help you through just about any account adjustment. We even have processes to perform some adjustments en masse, like refunds or write-offs. E Acce[a 6 Utility Billing (UB) - continued Balancing UB to GL Periodic balancing can be a challenge without a good routine. We'll help you with a range of tools and reliable processes for balancing your Utility Billing system to your general ledger. Billing We know how important your bills are. From calculating charges eight ways from Sunday, to helping you catch variances before the bill goes out, to printing a truly informative statement for your customer, we've got you covered. Meter Management You've got a lot riding on metering processes — accuracy of bills and accountability for consumption revenue, just to name a couple. Whether you offer a single metered service or several, we offer everything from interfaces to meter software, and tools to review and validate readings. New Features See the newest features added to the Utility Billing system in the last year, all of which are available to cloud customers today! Also, see a sneak peak of the roadmap and what's to come. Online Payments for Utility Billing, Business Tax and Business Licenses Online Bills processing and PCI compliance. Online Bill enhancements. Online-bills.com Be a more efficient utility with the power of Online-bills.com. This is an overview class that will discuss the benefits of citizen engagement through e -billing, account access and payment processing. Past Dues Automating Journal Entry Topics include importing large journal entries, recurring journal entries, reversing journal entries and automatic interest allocation journal entries. This session covers setup and usage of these journal entry processes. We will also discuss how to use automated processes to correct journal entries committed to incorrect periods. Reporting You need reports, we've got 'em! Learn how to make the most of our comprehensive selection of standard reports. We'll also help you leverage export options and Query by Example for those times you need to crunch your data in external applications like Excel. E Acce la 7 18. EMPLOYEE EDUCATION AND TRAINING The City promotes staff development as an essential, ongoing function needed to maintain and improve cost effective quality service to residents. The purposes for staff development are to ensure that employees develop and maintain the knowledge and skills necessary for effective job performance and employees are provided with an opportunity for job enrichment. General Policies A. The City shall encourage training sessions involving employees of the same department or of similar job classifications where necessary to aid in work performance. B. Supervisors shall provide an orientation program for new employees. C. The immediate supervisor shall ensure training is provided for the operation of new equipment as required. D. The City encourages contact with personnel from other municipalities and public agencies in order to learn more efficient job procedures. E. The City encourages the use of in-house talents and skills in training as well as the expertise of local citizens, companies and agencies. F. Training that costs the City money must be approved in advance by the employee's supervisor. G. Upon completion of the training the supervisor may request a certificate of completion or a short summary by the employee. General Guidelines General guidelines for training where the City provides financial support and/or time off work are as follows: Work interference shall be minimal. 2. Training shall not duplicate recent training. 3. Training costs shall be within budgetary limits. 4. Preference shall be given to training that provides the most benefit to the City at the least cost. 5. The department head shall ensure that there is adequate coverage of departmental responsibilities before approving training applications. 6. Training shall relate to an employee's job or health/safety. 7. Efforts shall be made to distribute training equitably within a department. 8. Training shall be structured to provide information that will aid in an employee's growth or maintenance of professional standards. 9. Temporary, seasonal, casual part-time and intermittent employees shall be excluded unless approved by their department head. Safety training shall be provided to all employees. 10. If attendance is required at a seminar, the City will pay tuition/registration fees and hourly wages for all required hours of attendance. Expenses will be paid in accordance with standard practices. This applies to regular full-time and part-time employees. 11. Employees should be aware at all times that they are representing the City while attending any conference, meeting, class or outside training. Employees should conduct themselves as if they were at work. Improper conduct at any City authorized or sponsored event reflects poorly on the City and will be subject to disciplinary action as if it occurred during regular working hours. National and Regional Training To be approved for national or regional training sessions, the employees must meet the following requirements: Be employed as a regular full-time or benefit -earning part-time employee for a minimum of six (6) months with the City. 2. Training must be approved in advance by the City Council. 3. Training sessions will normally not exceed five (5) workdays. 4. Council may require an employee reimburse the City for airfare, hotel, and registration fees for an approved national or regional training event if the employee voluntarily terminates employment within six (6) months of completion of the training. The classes of employees eligible for national training sessions (out of the region) are the City Administrator and Department Heads. Exceptions may be approved by the City Administrator. All management and supervisory staff are eligible for regional training sessions in Wisconsin, Iowa, North Dakota, and South Dakota, assuming general guidelines of this policy are met. On an exception basis, non -supervisory staff may be approved for regional training by the City Administrator. Training Sessions Within Minnesota Professional and technical employees are eligible for training sessions held anywhere within the State of Minnesota assuming general guidelines of this policy are met. All employees are eligible for local training (Monticello, St. Cloud or the Twin Cities metro -area) under the same assumptions. Employees are expected to attend training sessions in the closest proximity to their work or home. Pavment or Reimbursement for Training Whenever possible employees should use their City Purchasing Card to pay for approved training and follow applicable procedures for substantiation of payment. If not possible, the City will pre -pay tuition or registration costs directly to the organization sponsoring the training. A copy of the conference or meeting agenda listing registration fees, meals included therein, and official starting and ending dates must be provided to the finance department with prepayment requests. Requests for reimbursement of training costs must include a copy of the conference or meeting agenda listing registration fees; meals included therein, official start and ending dates and proof of payment. Tuition Reimbursement Full-time and part-time benefited employees are eligible for tuition reimbursement for courses taken for credit at an approved post -high school educational institution subject to the following criteria: A. Courses must be directly related to the employee's present position (whether required for a degree program or not); or B. Courses must be directly related to a reasonable promotional opportunity in the same field of work as present position (whether part of a degree program or not). C. Courses must be approved in advance of the first day of class by the Department head and City Administrator in accordance with established procedures and the cost must be included in the approved City budget. The employee education request should cover any adjustment in the work schedule that may be necessary. D. Any costs other than tuition and course materials will not be reimbursed by the City. E. Employees are required to take courses outside of their work schedule whenever possible. All work schedule adjustments must be approved by the supervisor. The City will pay 50% of the cost of tuition and course materials upon successful completion (C grade), 75% reimbursement upon completion with a `B" or "A" grade. Courses taken "pass/fail" will be reimbursed at the same percentage as a C grade (if passed). All reimbursements will be prorated for benefit -earning part-time employees. The maximum reimbursement will be $1500 per year per employee, subject to budget limitations. Employees must reimburse the City if they voluntarily leave employment within twelve (12) months of reimbursement. Memberships and Dues The purpose of memberships to various professional organizations must be directly related to the betterment of the services of the City. Normally one City membership per agency, as determined by the City Administrator is allowed, providing funds are available. Upon separation of employment, when allowed by the professional organization, individual memberships paid for by the City will remain with the City and will be transferred to other employees by the department head. *For additional information regarding training and reimbursement procedures contact the Human Resources Manager or Finance Department. 19. TRAVEL AND REIMBURSEMENT POLICY Purpose The purpose of the travel and reimbursement policy is to establish uniform and consistent guidelines for the reimbursement of money spent on official city business. The guidelines were developed using City practices, State regulations, and State Auditor recommendations. The policy and procedures relative to such travel are contained in the following statement. Travel by City officials and employees to attend a professional or municipal association meeting is beneficial to progressive local government. A person engaged in such travel for the benefit of the City has a responsibility to keep accurate, substantiated records and to submit a request for reimbursement in accordance with this policy. Training Training must be approved in advance by the department head. All out-of-state training must be approved by the City Council. Whenever possible the City will prepay tuition or registration costs directly to the organization sponsoring the training. A copy of the conference or meeting agenda listing registration fees, meals included therein, and official starting and ending dates must be provided to the finance department with prepayment requests. If it is not possible to prepay tuition or registration cost the employee will be reimbursed the cost. Requests for reimbursement of training costs must include a copy of the conference or meeting agenda listing registration fees; meals included therein, official start and ending dates and proof of payment. Travel Mileage will be reimbursed at the current IRS mileage reimbursement rate. Reimbursable mileage will be the lesser of actual miles driven from normal work location to training/meeting/conference location or the actual miles traveled from departure location to destination less the mileage of commute to normal work location. If this results in the employee traveling less miles, the City will not reimburse the employee for mileage. When more than one City employee uses the same personal car for travel, reimbursement shall be based upon the IRS mileage reimbursement rate, payable to the owner of the vehicle. Out -Of -State Travel: All out-of-state travel must be approved by the City Council. A copy of the conference or meeting agenda listing registration fees, meals included therein, and official starting and ending dates must be provided. Airfare or train fare for out-of-state travel in coach or economy class or the lowest available fare shall be the preferred mode of transportation. When authorized, an employee may choose to drive their personal vehicle and will be reimbursed the current mileage rate or the cost of coach or economy class fare, priced at least 14 days in advance of the travel, whichever is less. If the employee travels by some other mode than by air, the additional time required over the time the air would require will be taken as vacation or compensatory time for full and part-time employees. Fire department personnel will not be reimbursed (paid) for extra time required for driving. Reimbursement for vehicular travel (meals, mileage, and lodging) shall not exceed what the total cost of what airline travel would have been. Local transportation such as taxicab and bus fares to and from airport, train station, lodging and conference, seminar or meeting is reimbursable only if circumstances require such travel. Receipts must be submitted for reimbursement. Costs for local transportation not pertaining directly to City business will not be reimbursed. Rental Vehicles: Reimbursement for the costs of renting a vehicle shall be made only when the necessity of such rental is for City purposes. Travel Credits: Whenever public funds are used to pay for travel or vehicle rental by an elected official or City employee, any credits or other benefits issued by the provider must accrue to the benefit of the City of Monticello. Request for reimbursement must include receipts or statements clearly stating dates and cost of travel fares paid and/or cost of the transportation paid. Reimbursement for rental vehicles must include dates of rental, vehicle type and fees paid. Meals The City will reimburse the elected official or City employee up to a maximum allowance of, $12.00 for breakfast, $20.00 for lunch and $25.00 for dinner, including sales tax and gratuities/tips, whichever is less, while on City business. The reimbursement for gratuity/tip should not exceed 15% of the total costs of reimbursable costs. Alcoholic beverages are not eligible for reimbursement. The limits do not apply when meal expense is included in the cost of the training, conference, or seminar. Additionally, the City does not reimburse cost on a per diem basis but for actual cost incurred. Itemized receipts must be submitted to qualify for reimbursement and must clearly state the date, name of the establishment (pre-printed form), itemized list of purchased items, total, and gratuity (if appropriate) of no more than 15%. Reimbursement request without a receipt or non -itemized credit card receipts will not be reimbursed. Elected officials or employees may occasionally be in the position of having to provide a meal for other persons who have official business with the City. In addition receipts for these meals must include the name of each person attending the meal along with a description of the public purpose/benefit of the meeting. The actual cost of the meals will be reimbursed in these instances however the cost of any alcoholic beverages will not be reimbursed. Lodging Hotel, motel or other authorized accommodations will be reimbursed at actual cost not to exceed the base occupancy rate and should be chosen based on reasonableness of cost and proximity to conference, meeting or training site. Each employee shall be allowed a base room. Unless previously approved by the City Administrator, overnight stays within 60 miles of the City will not be reimbursed. Detail lodging receipts must be submitted for reimbursement. The receipts must include the dates of the stay, nightly room rate and any incidental expenses charged. Only incidental costs related to the room charges will be reimbursed. Lodging costs, unless previously approved by the City Administrator, shall be reimbursable only from the night preceding a conference, seminar, or training through the night immediately following such event. Miscellaneous Exuenses Hourly employees may receive overtime pay if the training/seminar/meeting hours including travel to/from exceed normal work hours. The employee's supervisor will approve all overtime prior to registering for the training/seminar/meeting. If the training/seminar/meeting hours including travel to/from are less than the normal work hours employees will use vacation or compensatory time to achieve normal work hours. Employees will be paid eight (8) hours of paid for training/seminar/meeting, which require overnight stays. Telephone expenses incurred will be reimbursed only when their necessity for City purpose is fully accounted for. Reimbursable parking is limited to daily parking at destination business (meeting, conference, training, etc.) site and/or hotel site (when applicable). Valet parking and all other parking are not allowable. Detail receipts including date, times and costs of parking should be provided when requesting reimbursement. Gratuities/tips for service providers may be reimbursed as long as reasonable and serve the public purpose of the trip. Non -Reimbursable Expenses The City shall not pay for any expenses, of which the costs are included in the registration fees. Costs for alcoholic beverages shall not be reimbursed. The City shall pay no expenses for a spouse/guest who accompanies the city official/employee to a conference, seminar, or meeting including the incremental lodging expenses of occupancy rates over base occupancy rates. The City will not reimburse for personal telephone calls, rental of luxury vehicles, or recreational expenses such as golf or tennis unless included as part of the registration fees or previously approved by the City Administrator. Reimbursement Process To apply for reimbursement, an elected official/City employee must complete an "Employee Reimbursement Voucher" form. The completed form with expenditures totaled, detailed original receipts attached, and signed should be submitted to the Department Head, who shall review and approve (by signing) such request. The Department Head shall forward the request to the Finance Department for reimbursement. The Finance Department will review the report and supporting documentation for completeness and accuracy. If complete the reimbursement check will be processed during the next regular accounts payable processing. If the request is not complete or supporting data does not meet policy guidelines, the request will be returned to the employee. Any exceptions to this policy must receive approval from the City Administrator whenever practicable prior to the conference, seminar or training. City Council Agenda 06/26/2017 2J. Consideration of approving the Communitv Center Director to attend the 2017 National Recreation and Parks Association Conference in New Orleans, LA on 9/25/17 through 9/28/17 at an estimated cost of $1,537. (AM/JO) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: City Council is asked to consider approving the Community Center Director's attendance at the upcoming 2017 National Recreation and Parks Association (NRPA) conference held in New Orleans, LA September 25 -28th. The current City policy allows for out-of- state training for the City Administrator and Department Heads upon approval of the City Council. The Personnel Committee has urged that the City Administrator as well as all department directors develop their capabilities, knowledge and network via attendance their respective national conferences. B. BUDGET IMPACT The estimated cost of attendance is $1,537 including round trip airfare ($500), hotel for 5 nights (free -staying with a colleague from another city), conference fee ($535), meals ($342), and ground transport to and from airports ($160). This training was not specifically budgeted for in 2017, but sufficient funds remain available in the MCC's travel and training budget to cover this request along with other staff training opportunities as they arise. C. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the Community Center Director to attend the 2017 National Recreation and Parks Conference in New Orleans, LA on 9/25/17 through 9/28/17 at an estimated cost of $1,537. 2. Motion to deny the Community Center Director from attending the 2017 National Recreation and Parks Conference in New Orleans, LA on 9/25/17 through 9/28/17 at an estimated cost of $1,537. D. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: The City Administrator and the Personnel Committee recommends Alternative #1 approving out-of-state training for the Community Center Director. Approval of the request was based on the following criteria: prior attendance, budget impact/cost, and relatedness to the position. E. SUPPORTING DATA: A. 2017 Conference Agenda B. Personnel Policy Relating to Out -of -State Training EARLY BIRD DISCOUNT ENDS AU6UST I i RL61STER No� AT �6N R PA National Recreation ��-NRPAAKXONFFRFNU and Park Association Because everyone deserves a park A- J - -- .� - The 2017 NRPA Annual Conference is not coming to New Orleans by coincidence. This event actually has a lot in common with The Big Easy. For one, it's BIG! The conference is comprised of more than 7,000 total attendees, nearly 500 exhibitors, more than 500 expert speakers and nearly 300 education sessions. It's also easy in a lot of different ways. It's easy to make connections with all the networking opportunities. It's easy to be inspired by the high-caliber speakers. And, sometimes, it's easy to get lost in the awe of the exhibit hall with such amazing displays to distract you. The 2017 NRPA Annual Conference is coming to New Orleans September 26-28 and we hope you will be part of the experience. Come to New Orleans. Come be inspired. THANK YOU TO THE SPONSORS OF THE 2017 NRPA ANNUAL CONFERENCE P L-AYC 0 R E Building communities through play & recreation'" Burice. PLAY THAT MOVES YOU (Gamewme) Greenfields Outdoor Fitness PLAT CORE comoaro Promoting Wellness& Fighting Obesity One Community at a Time. USM find yourself in the game XMIki 11('1 111.1.ii1 r IBIB ----------------------------------------------------------------- Register now at www.nrpa.org/Conference 11 S(ULDULL AT A 6LAN(L 9 SATURDAY, SEPTEMBER 23 (oaE-coNFERE NCE) 8:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. Certified Playground Safety Inspector (CPSI) Course SUNDAY, SEPTEMBER 24 (PRE -CONFERENCE) 8:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. Certified Playground Safety Inspector (CPSI) Course 8:30 a.m. - 5:30 p.m. Aquatic Facility Operator (AFO) Course and Exam 2:00 p.m. - 4:00 p.m. Parks Build Community: Lafitte Greenway Dedication MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 25 (PRE -CONFERENCE) 7:00 a.m. - 2:00 p.m. Golf Tournament (presented by New Orleans Local Host Committee) 8:00 a.m. -12:00 p.m. Certified Playground Safety Inspector (CPSI) Exam 8:00 a.m. - 5:30 p.m. PCW: Choose the Path to Certification CPRP 8:30 a.m. - 5:30 p.m. Aquatic Facility Operator (AFO) Course and Exam 9:00 a.m. -11:15 a.m. PCW: Leading to Create Organizational Excellence 9:00 a.m. -12:15 p.m. PCW: Grant Writing with a Purpose: Connecting Dreams to Resources 9:00 a.m. - 4:45 p.m. PCW: MarCom Camp: Engage Your Community, Get More People in Your Parks (Lunch provided) 9:00 a.m. - 5:30 p.m. Off -Site Institutes (presented by New Orleans Local Host Committee) 12:30 p.m. - 4:45 p.m. PCW: Agency Accreditation and CAPRA Visitor Training: A Mark of Excellence! 1:00 p.m. - 4:15 p.m. PCW: President Trump, Attorney General Sessions, and the ADA: Rollback, Revision, or Racing Ahead for Parks and Recreation Agencies? 2:30 p.m. - 4:30 p.m. NRPA Student Recreation Challenge 8:00 p.m. - 9:30 p.m. Gold Medal Reception (By Invitation Only) TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 26 9:00 a.m. -10:30 a.m. NRPA Opening General Session Disclaimer: Due to unforseeable 1:00 p.m. - 5:25 p.m. Education Sessions circumstances, this information 5:00 p.m. - 6:30 p.m. Exhibit Hall Happy Hour may change after printing. 6:30 p.m. - 9:00 p.m. NRPA Opening Reception: Mardi Gras World (sponsored by GameTime) PCW = Pre -Conference Workshop WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 27 9:00 a.m. -10:30 a.m. Speed Sessions 12:00 p.m. - 2:00 p.m. Research Poster Sessions 2:30 p.m. - 3:45 p.m. George R. Butler Lecture 2:30 p.m. - 5:30 p.m. Education Sessions 6:30 p.m. - 7:30 p.m. Best of the Best Ceremony (sponsored by Vortex) 7:30 p.m. - 8:30 p.m. Best of the Best Reception THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 28 7:00 a.m. - 9:00 a.m. 5k Fun Run and Walk (presented by New Orleans Local Host Committee) 8:00 a.m. - 4:30 p.m. Education Sessions 8:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. Off -Site Institutes (presented by New Orleans Local Host Committee) 11:00 a.m. -1:30 p.m. Ethnic Minority Society Luncheon (with the Empty Bowls Project) ---------------------------------------------------------------- 2 1 Register now at www.nrpa.org/Conference �J OTA (Sponsored by US ) The 2017 NRPA Annual Conference is packed full of inspirational and innovative education sessions and workshops. Nearly 300 education sessions will cover a variety of tracks in an array of formats. This is the best opportunity for park and recreation professionals to be challenged and learn from some of the top thought leaders in the field. Education Formats A variety of session formats allows attendees to choose what fits their learning style best by getting out of their chairs to get active, spending time outside, interacting directly with speakers and much more. • NRPA General Session • Speed Sessions • Pre -Conference Workshops (PCW) • Mobile Workshops • Learning Playground • Directors' Corner • Research Sessions • Off -Site Institutes (OSI) Education Tracks 11 education tracks allow attendees to follow a track that best suits their needs, or participate across all tracks for a well-rounded experience. New this year, the Aquatics education track is debuting to meet the needs of the hundreds of aquatics professionals who attend each year. • Advocacy • Aquatics • Conservation • Employee/Volunteer Management • Health & Wellness • Leadership & Management • Planning, Design & Maintenance • Professional Development • Public Relations/Marketing • Recreation & Sports Programming • Research • Revenue/Customer Service -------------------------------- 4 1 Register now at www.nrpa.org/Conference Earn CEUs to Maintain Your Certifications Attendees can earn at least 0.1 Continuing Education Units (CEUs) for attending most education sessions and have the potential to earn up to 1.8 CEUs total. To earn CEUs, attendees must attend the entire education session. Some sessions are not eligible for CEUs and this will be indicated in the Conference App and the onsite pocket guide. New This Year: • You can now earn 0.1 CEU for attending three Speed Sessions. • CEUs will easily be tracked electronically. ^10NDAY, SIPTI�`1PIR 25 PRC -CONFERENCE ORMHOPS Get the most out of your trip to New Orleans by attending a Pre -Conference Workshop. Covering topics such as leadership, marketing and communications, accreditation, and certification, these workshops provide hands-on instruction and in-depth information. The PCWs are eligible for CEUs. • Agency Accreditation and CAPRA Visitor Training: A Mark of Excellence • Leading to Create Organizational Excellence • Choose the Path to Certification — CPRP • • • Grant Writing with a Purpose: Connecting Dreams to Resources • MarCom Camp: Engage Your Community, Get More People in Your Parks • President Trump, Attorney General Sessions, and the ADA: Rollback, Revision, or Racing Ahead for Parks and Recreation Agencies? For detailed descriptions and to register, visit www.nrpa.org/Conference OFF-SITE INSTITUTES Sign up for an Off -Site Institute and join the Local Host for an inspiring tour of the unique cultural attractions in New Orleans. The Off -Site Institutes are eligible for CEUs. • Rolling Down the River to Jean Lafitte National Historical Park • Bayou Segnette Park and Swamp Tour [SOLD OUT] • Recreation District Shares Secrets to Their Success • A Taste of New of Orleans: Afro -Brazilians, Mardi Gras Indians. Second Lines and Brass Bands • Connecting Communities: Walking Workshop on the Lafitte Greenway • Eco Tour of Barataria Preserve and Oyster Boat Experience • Designing and Building a Water Park: Touring BREC's Liberty Lagoon Flowrider Expansion • Freeport-McMoRan Audubon Species Survival Center and Wilderness Park Tour • New Orleans City Park: Recovery from Hurricane Katrina • History of New Orleans Through the Eyes of Recreation ----------------------------------------------------------------- Register now at www.nrpa.org/Conference 15 TUESDAY, SLPTFhARFR 26 • • Education Sessions ADVOCACY Overwhelmed by Accessibility? A Quick Guide to Creating Accessible and Inclusive Temporary Events Elise Niedermeier, Erica Chua, Jennifer Skulski 'Gilt' by Association — We Make You Shine! Eleanor Warmack, Jan Neitzert Inclusion Success: Myth or Bottom Line to ADA Compliance? Ashley Thomas Access and Inclusion in Parks & Recreation Brandon Harris, Tiffany White, Tom O'Rourke, Mariela Fernandez, Local Government Officials' Views of Park & Recreation Services Alan Graefe, Andrew Mowen, Austin Barrett AQUATICS Designing for Inclusivity: Accessible Play Experiences in the Aquatic Splashpad Environment John McGovern, Dennis Scott Managing Risk When Failure Is Not an Option Sandra Kellogg Drownings in Pools with Lifeguards on Duty: Why Submerged Victims Go Unnoticed Maria Bella Three Months of Aquatic Operation Equals One Year's Worth of Work George Deines CONSERVATION Birds as a Conservation Tool for Your Community Jennifer Fee Great Urban Parks Campaign: 4 Green Infrastructure Stormwater Management Projects in Parks Heather Sage, Laura Connelly, Loretta Pineda, Michael Halicki, Richard Dolesh Conservation Partnerships for Parks & Recreation James Gorges, Kent Whitehead, Michael Hecker No Naturalists? No Problem! Shannon Burton EMPLOYEE/VOLUNTEER MANAGEMENT Attracting, Hiring and Developing the Next Generation of Parks & Recreation Professionals Desiree Tabores, Hazel Bhang Barnett, Sosha Pifer It's Up to Us: Preventing Child Sexual Abuse in Our Parks Julia Strehlow, Nikki Ginger Purposed -Based Recognition: Recognizing, Rewarding and Retaining Staff Lori A. Hoffner HEALTH & WELLNESS Commit to Health: Walking the Talk Allison Colman Evidence -Based Landscape Design: Sensory Play Environments Value for Children with Developmental Disorders Lucy Miller, John McConkey Evidence -Based Physical Activity Programs for Older Adults Lesha Spencer -Brown, Shannon Willis, Michele Mercier Lessons from Living on the Brink Ryan Davis Outdoor Music Parks: The Landscape of the Future Donna Codd, Ines Palacios, Richard Cooke Research That Matters: Helping to Shape the Future of Parks & Recreation Aaron Hipp, Jason Bocarro, Teresa Penbrooke Simple Resources to Energize Staff, Children and Families Through Nature Daniel Hatcher, Jennifer Fee Community Shuttle Program Michael Bennett, Amy Deck Fitness Programming Trends and the Well -Qualified Fitness Professional Sheila Franklin Inclusive Outreach for Equitable Results: Using a Logic Model for the Get Moving Initiative Justin Hellier, Lakema Bell Using Health Data to Power Results George Kosovich, Sarah Olson LEADERSHIP & MANAGEMENT If You're Happy and They Know It, Happy Staff! Positive Psychology and Authentic Leadership Michael Bork Creating a Strategy -Focused Organization Barbara Heller Doing Less with More Through Collaboration David Marquardt, Siqi Zhu, Briana Hensold, Connie Chung, Risk Management for Parks & Recreation Dirk Richwine, Kathy Capps Why Work Culture Matters Ray Ochromowicz, Kim Sellars Build a 21st Century Diverse Workforce and Inclusive Work Environment at Your Agency Today Boe Carlson, Denise Barreto In Conflict with Dakota Indian Tribal Wisdom Jamie Sabbach Using Economic Impact Data to Tell Your Agency's Park & Recreation Story Kevin Roth, Terry Clower Every Employee Matters: Supervisor Toolkit for Recognizing Your Greatest Assets Annie Olson, Iris Pahiberg Peterson Lessons from the Legends: America's Expanding Liberal Democratic Tradition Kelly Bricker, Keri Schwab, Matthew Brownlee, Dan Dustin, Public Facility Accessibility with Transgender Populations Michael Clark Quality In/Quality Out: The Intentionality Behind Strategic Partnership Planning Maya Wyche, Shonnda Smith Robert W. Crawford Lecture Calvin Mackie — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — - 6 1 Register now at www.nrpa.org/Conference TULSDAYP S 26 • PLANNING, DESIGN & MAINTENANCE REVENUE/CUSTOMER SERVICE How to Portray the Value of Trails in Your Community Beth Poovey, Candace Damon Break Some Rules: Stop Thinking Like a Municipal Employee Kirsten Barnes, Rich DiGirolamo Planning Backward: An Effective, Simple Approach to Long -Range Planning Stephen Creating a Culture of Guest Service Excellence Neelay Bhatt Madewell Free to Fee: Tiered Program Services for All! Steven Thompson Stabilizing Detroit Neighborhoods Through Parks Juliana Fulton, Meagan Elliott Just Gimme a Number! Jason Moore, Mick Massey National 10 -Minute Walk Campaign Rachel Banner Universal Design in a Park and Zoological Setting Mark Trieglaff Kick Your Park Assets into the 21st Century Todd Reichardt, Troy Sykes Realizing the Promise & Potential of Smart Parks Bobbi Nance, Edward Krafcik PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT 12 Steps to Personal (and Professional) Success Paul Blake Get Off Your Feet! Develop Better Leadership Skills Using Improvisation Bill Evans Effective Communication: The Key to Your Long -Term Success M Michelle Bono The Plight of Middle Management: The Art of Managing Up Jai Cole, Mary Bradford COAPRT Training Julie Lammel, Ruthie Kucharewski Agency Accreditation Basics Seve Ghose, Laura Wetherald COAPRT Visitor Training Jason Bocarro, Doug Kennedy How to Submit a Winning Session or Speed Session Proposal Lucky DAscanio, Michael Klitzing PUBLIC RELATIONS/MARKETING How to Handle a Parks & Recreation PR Communications Crisis Steve Stoler Marketing Strategy: From Practical to Practically Insane Ryan Hegreness Getting the Word Out: How to Promote Your Program/Event/Facility Jill Edwards RECREATION & SPORTS PROGRAMMING Boo! Ghosts as a Tool for Public Engagement Mark Nesbitt, Tim Nealon, Richard Fink 11 Using Parks and Rec to Grow the Next Generation of STEAM Innovators Brittany Lassiter, Lauren Belle Bullying Among Older Adults Jean Keller Connect and Energize Your City Through Recreation Dave Lewis, Ryan O'Connor, Jeffrey Bransford, Carolyn McKnight Play Ball! MLB Youth Programs & Initiatives Bennett Mayfield, David James ---------------------------------------------------------------- Register now at www.nrpa.org/Conference 17 V FDNFSDAY, SIPTIMBIR zf Education Sessions ADVOCACY For Richer, for Poorer: The Impact of Socioeconomics in Parks & Recreation Debbie Woodbury, Tori Spaugh Darensburg A Communications Frame to Replicate California's Green Justice Work Robert Garcia AQUATICS Reinventing the Urban Aquatics System Robin Steinshnider, David Mills Aquatic Management: Training and Mentoring Senior Staff Chris Chamberlain, James Wheeler CONSERVATION Citizen Scientists: Answering the Call of the Wild David Riensche The Best of Both Worlds: Balancing Conservation and Recreation Jai Cole 5 Things Parks Can Do About Climate Change That Make a Difference Maria Nardi, Oksana Shcherba Wildlife Management in a Public Park Setting: Managing the Sometimes Unmanageable Mark Patterson EMPLOYEE/VOLUNTEER MANAGEMENT Empower YOUth: Making Youth Work WORK Lakita Watson, Rickeda Fofana Select, Don't Hire! Kirsten Barnes Embracing Millennials in the Workplace: Seasonal Employees, Interns and Beyond Julie Knapp Policies and Procedures for Volunteer Screening and Supervision Betty Swinners Run!!! The Volunteer Coordinator Person Is Coming Rich DiGirolamo HEALTH & WELLNESS Concussion: It Is NOT Just the NFL Paula Powell, Anthony Salvatore Changing Your Aging Brain Can Be as Simple as Child's Play Denise Medved, Karen Haseley Designing and Implementing Evidence -Based, Family -Based Programming for Health Shari Barkin, William Heerman, Emily Stevens, Melanie Hollingshead, Positioning Local Parks & Recreation as Preventive Public Health Providers Teresa Penbrooke Transforming Communities and Fostering Social Equity Through Inclusive Play Spaces John McConkey, Ingrid Kanics LEADERSHIP & MANAGEMENT Stack the Deck in Your Team's Favor Terry Robertson, Keith Fulthorp, Idris Al-Oboudi Delivering YOUR TED Talk: How to Speak So People Listen Neelay Bhott Disaster Readiness: Before, During and After the Rain, Wind, Fire Rafael Payan, Robert Becker, Tom Shuster, Carolyn McKnight, Park & Recreation Professionals as City Managers Bill Smith Parks & Recreation 2030 and Beyond Tom O'Rourke All in a Day's Work Michael Kirschman CAPRA Accreditation: You Can Do It! Shauna Lewallen How Do I Keep My Head Above Water? Chris Dropinski, Art Thatcher PLANNING. DESIGN & MAINTENANCE City of New Orleans: Strategic Urban Water Management and Recreation Opportunities Jeffrey Hebert, Katie Dignan Next Generation Trail Networks: Rails -to -Trails Conservancy's National Portfolio of Transformative Trail Network Projects Eric Oberg, Elizabeth Thorstensen Trends in Park Planning and Design Leon Younger, Joseph Webb TRENDS: The Future of Recreation Centers Craig Bouck, Mick Massey PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT How Chicago, Houston and St. Louis Park Executives Developed Successful Public - Private Partnerships Joe Turner, Michael Kelly, Susan Trautman Making Creativity Part of Your DNA M Michelle Bono Contemporary Trends in Local Park & Recreation Agency Financing and Employment Kevin Roth, Andrew Mowen, Austin Barrett, Nicholas Pitas What Is Your Awesome Sauce? Cortni Grange, Atuya Cornwell PUBLIC RELATIONS/MARKETING Leveraging Social Media as a Program and Communication Tool Andre Pichly Too Long, Didn't Read: Web Engagement and Social Media Policy Megan Williams RECREATION & SPORTS PROGRAMMING Let's Play Games! Paul Wright Active Adults: Best of the Best — Part 2 Rhonda Pollard, Teresa Grodsky, Lynda Cochran Advancing Your Pickleball Programs Shane Wampler Recreation Program Prioritization: Aligning Your Portfolio with Community Values Alison Rhodes, Dean Rummel, Austin Hochstetler Healthy Military Families: A Case Study for ALL Communities Carol Potter, Matt Enoch REVENUE/CUSTOMER SERVICE Customer Service Boot Camp: Back to the Basics for Professionals Annie Olson, Iris Pahlberg Peterson Financing Parks Projects Without Losing Sleep Caitlin Guthrie, Reggie Hall 40 _ — n L — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — - 8 1 Register now at www.nrpa.org/Conference FDNFSDAY, SIPTIMBIR zf SPEED SESSIONS You can earn 0.1 CEU for attending three Speed Sessions. #NoMoreBoringMeetings Shannon Keleher Three Resources to Energize Your Next Staff Meeting Daniel Hatcher A Funding Source to Renovate Your Tennis Facility Todd Carlson A New Division of Parks and Recreation: Community Engagement Dan Domsic Ageless Grace: Fun Fitness for the Body and Brain Karen Haseley All of the Above: Improving Park Access in Land -Constrained Communities Andrew Dobshinsky Better Together: How to Get the Most Through Collaboration with College Programs Jayne McGuire Bridging the Gap — Healthy Army Communities Timothy Higdon Bringing Civics Back: Introducing a City Government Academy Tony Elliot Bringing People to Parks: Transit, Transportation Contracting and Rideshare Alternatives Jonathan Warning Bringing the Indoors Outside: How to Create Functional Outdoor Gyms That Get Results Anne -Marie Spencer Build Your Own Parks and Recreation Employee Mentoring Program Veronica Schulte Building Your Website Based on Your Customer's Journey, a NOVA Parks Case Study Brian Bauer Changing the Way Youth Tennis Looks Anne Davis Closing the Sale with Exceptional Customer Service Beth Waller Conducting a Successful Grant Search to Fund Your Project Anne -Marie Spencer Creating Spaces to Play: Pocket Parks Laurel Richmond Do We Dare? Sure -Fire Changes for P & R's Future Ellen O'Sullivan Do You Have a Seat at the Table? Connecting Schools, Communities and Recreation Priscilla Wright Do You Have What Sponsors Want? Jasmine Lee Education: The Difference Between Mediocrity and Excellence in Customer Service Tom Diehl Facebook, Airbnb and Baby Carrots. What's Their Secret? What Can We Learn from Them? Ellen O'Sullivan Future -Proofing Your Organization Keith Hobson Giving New Life to Senior Center Programing Trisha Weston Going Smoke Free: The Process, Results and Free Advice Robert Wayt Healthy Office and Break -Room Makeover: Five Things to Try Next Week Daniel Hatcher Help Parents Connect with Their Kids on Game Day — Two Phrases That Work Kevin Riley How Parks and Recreation Can Enhance Racial, Cultural and Religious Harmony in Our Communities Tom O'Rourke Improving Social Equity and Preventing Gentrification Through Parks David Rouse Innovation in 19.5 Minutes Barbara Heller Innovative Ways to Bring Diversity Programming to Your Recreation Center Cathi Ellis Joyful Play the Results Driven Way Sharia Shanklin Kick Your Marketing Up A Notch — How to Develop and Implement an Engaging Brand Message Nicole Van Winkle Learning to Create 60,480 New Games in Minutes John LaRue Let Your Patrons Design Your Program Guide: Why and How to Conduct User Testing for Redesign Sarah -Kate Sharkey Making Meetings Matter: When an Email Just Won't Do Kirsten Barnes Managing Increased Demand for Use of Public Space Kyle Griggs Nurture Your Employees Through an Engaging Culture Beth Waller Parks and Recreation Center Standards Manual Cathi Ellis Photovoice: Involvement That Gives Youth A Community Voice Kimberly Keller Pickpockets: STEAL the Top Three Techniques for Strategic Communication with Style, Speed and Skill Sherenia Gibbs Reclaiming Infrastructure: Increasing Access to Public Space for Community Health Taylor McNeill Recommendations for Pizza ... and More! Rob Schoeber RecStat: Data is the New Bacon Jason Yuckenberg Social Media Graphics Made Easy Catrina Belt Steal This Presentation: Making a Case to Invest in Social Media Marketing Matt Carusona Straight from the Horse's Mouth Shannon Keleher Swimming with Autism, Physical Difficulties, Anxiety and Sensory Challenges Cindy Freedman Task Management Made Easy (and Free): Exploring Trello Becky Dunlap Technology in the Workplace: Innovative Tools for Productivity Becky Dunlap The Four Universal Pillars of Effective Training George Deines The Magic of Thinking Big Ray Ochromowicz The QCC's of Cooking: Sustainable Cooking, Unconventional Lifestyles Nicole Young The Three I's of Sustainability: Introducing, Interpreting and Implementing a Sustainability Plan Joey Furuto The Universal Language of Play Una de Boer Turning Quality Play into Quality Data Matt Toner Use Data Provided by Your Community to Justify the Need to Expand and Enhance Your Organization Tom Diehl What the Heck is Recreation Program Workload Analysis? Steve Cherveny What You Need to Know to Get Hired in Parks and Recreation — An NRPA Job Posting Analysis Gerry Logan Who's on Your Marketing Team? Mary Cherveny Win -Win: The Benefits of Strong Customer Relationships Jessica Moran Register now at www.nrpa.org/Conference 19 THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 2d Education Sessions ADVOCACY Big to Small Ideas of Social Equity Addie Weaver, Claudine Bennett Proceed with Caution: Emergency Preparedness for Individuals with Disabilities Genevieve Jennai, Marybeth Dugan Essential, Indispensable, Vital, Crucial, Fundamental: Redefining Your Park & Recreation Agency Lisa Paradis Addressing Homelessness Through Collaboration Troy Houtman, Matt Townsend Shift into Gear: Considerations for Biking in Your Community Ines Palacios Tale of Two Free Summer Meal Programs: Campaign to End Summer Hunger Mark McCain, Nicholas Forline New Funding for Parks & Rec Education Programs Through the Every Student Succeeds Act Sarah Bodor Use Program Evaluation Data to Increase Your Park Foundations' Fundraising Goals Nathan A. Schaumleffel, Donald Ortale, Amy Dingle, Leah Salmon, Collaborating to Enhance Your Parks: Advisory Groups in Action! Becky Kliber, Maria Dmyterko Stone AQUATICS MAHC: Are You Ready? Kevin Post Why Chlorine Doesn't Cut It: Secondary Sanitizers Risk vs. Reward Nick Rancis Diving into Diversity: Attracting, Training and Growing a Diverse Aquatic Team Nicole Jacobson How Loyal Are Your Customers... After the Waterpark Explodes? Nancy Kaiser Water Wisdom: Planning, Designing and Maintaining Water Play Destinations Chris Thomas, Tom Norquist Spray Play for All: Designing Inclusive Spray Grounds and Splash Parks Bill Hachmeister, John McConkey, Ingrid Kanics Taking Camps SAFELY to the Pool Sandra Kellogg The Third -Party Candidate: Other Options in Aquatic Lessons and Certifications Sara McKay, Alyssa Kellas, Jennifer Fink CONSERVATION Ecologically Sustainable Landscapes: Using Nature to Close the Play Gap Emily Roth, Jaime English Managing Natural Areas: What's Your Problem?! Christopher Matthews, Jai Cole The Ecological Age: Ushering a New Age for Parks in the Face of Climate Change Erich Pfuehler, Ana Alvarez, Brian Holt Innovative Community Gardening and Its Role in Social Justice and Community Resilience Serda Ozbenian Innovative Strategies to Connect Communities to Nature Lori Robertson Creating a Greenways Maintenance Program Trent Rondot Connecting People to Local Waterways Through Restoration and Recreation David Marquardt, Jenny Cox EMPLOYEE/VOLUNTEER MANAGEMENT 10 Tools and Apps for Every Recreation and Park Professional Matt Carusona, Michelle Wells Customer Service in a Recreation World Craig Ward, Josh Wells A Mentoring Program for Large Staff Organizations Debbie Trueblood I.R.Sted Development Shawna Fachet Are My Volunteers Engaged? Holli Browder, Christopher Bass • HEALTH & WELLNESS Live Well: Developing a Healthy Workplace for Employees Joseph Lovell Success Strategies for Outdoor Gyms: Planning, Funding and Execution Allison Abel, Jennifer French What Do Your Customers Really Want? Concessions That Are Good for You and Your Customers Cindy DeBlauw, Natalie Hampton Back2BasicPlay: The Foundation of Cooperative Games — Addressing Character and Healthy Play Habits John LaRue Learn How Communities Are Innovating and Improving Access to Play Spaces for Children and Families Marla Collum Community Assets to Improve Rural Health Through Parks & Recreation Rachel Banner, Mike Meit Finding Work/Personal Life Balance — Humorous Tales and Helpful Tips Carrie Fullerton, Janice Hincapie You Did WHAT in the Heart of Tobacco County?!? Kimberly Boyha, Michael Kirschman Laughter and Latex Workshop: Beating Stress Silly! Michael Bork Public -Private Park Partnerships to Achieve Healthy Equity Kellie May LEADERSHIP & MANAGEMENT Helping Teens Understand the Value of Leadership Lori A. Hoffner Innovative Technology Solutions Felina Harris, Jerrick Gresham Leading Change: Innovation from the Inside Out Kurtis Baumgartner, Mark Westermeier Predicting Trends for an Unpredictable Future Leon Younger, Neelay Bhott A Value Proposition: What's My Park Worth? Brendan Daley Must Do! Implementing Facility Asset Management for Your Agency Steve Wolter, William Roche, Jeff Dillon RUN! They're Talking About Cost Recovery Again Jamie Sabbach 10 Tools for Cost Recovery Jill Slupe EngAGE in Conversation: Challenges and Solutions with the Aging Lynda Cochran Know Before You Fly... Managing and Using Drones in Parks Michael Clark PARC Leadership — Because CRAP Leadership Just Doesn't Have the Same Ring Brad Chambers 'Making Dollars and Sense' the Benefits of Parks & Recreation Art Thatcher Leadership Development: Understanding Leadership Across Generations Tiffany Johnson, Dietrich Williams The Be Attitudes of Influence and Persuasion Ray Ochromowicz, Kim Sellars Gold Medal Panel Session Brian Zimmerman, Doug McRainey, Tim Dentler, Vincent Martorello, Jim Randall, Richard Carman, Carol Potter, Jodie Adams PLANNING, DESIGN & MAINTENANCE How to Ensure Success with Your Synthetics! Kevin Williams, Todd Johnson Resiliency Is Not an Option: It's the Future Richard Dolesh, David Barth Restoration and Resilience of Coastal Systems in Park Design and Planning Roxanne Blackwell, Jennifer Dowdell, Lauren Crapanzano Jumonville, Andrew Duggan VOTE! How to Plan a Successful Bond Program Craig Bouck, Ken Sherbenou Inclusive Play Matters: Whole Child, Whole Environment, Whole Community Solutions Jennie Sumrell, Lisa Moore — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — - 10 1 Register now at www.nrpa.org/Conference THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 2d Creating Nature Play Areas in Community Parks Robin Moore, Sarah Konradi, Vonda Martin Diverse Voices, Diverse Needs: An Interactive Way to Engage and Strengthen Your Community John Todoroff, Anabel Lopez -Salinas, Nicole Paulsen Connecting the City: Building the Dallas Trail Network Willis Winters The Eye of the Beholder: 25 Dimensions of Park Planning and Design David Barth Portland Off -Road Cycling Master Plan: Metropolitan -Scale Recreation Planning Not Lopes, Michelle Kunec-North Parks and R(equity): Leveraging Investments in Parks and Recreation to Create a More Equitable City David Gould, Kathryn Ott Lovell PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT Written Communication: The Right Way, Wrong Way and Army Way Gary Gates The New Professional's Guide to Career Advancement Dan Carpenter, Jennifer Letourneau From the Gym to the Office: Navigating Career Advancement Lakita Watson Gigabyte Gumbo: A Parks & Rec Technology Gameshow Benjamin Denissen, Nick Hermes You Had Me at Hello: Identifying and Owning Your Style of Communication for Talking with Teens and Other Tough People Heidi Pope, Sherenia Gibbs I've Heard of Career Development, But What About Retirement Development? Michael Mulvaney COAPRT Visitor Training Jason Bocarro, Doug Kennedy COAPRT Program Training Julie Lammel, Ruthie Kucharewski PUBLIC RELATIONS/MARKETING Once Upon a Time! Using On -Hand Technology to Achieve Your Marketing and Storytelling Goals Cossi Hayden, Rae Wallace Practical Solutions for Marketing Youth Sports Programs John Engh Ditch Your Marketing Plan: Growth Hack Instead Ian Everett Crisis Communications: When Disaster Strikes, Making Your Agency Shine During the Storm Cheryl Michelet Thinking Outside the Block: The Value of Historic Properties in Parks & Recreation Gina Vaughan, Juanita Moore-Akida, Sheila Taylor RECREATION & SPORTS PROGRAMMING Creating Meaningful Arts Programs Designed to Engage the Community Amy McBride, Mary Tuttle How to Set Up Your Summer for Success: Summer Should Be Fun! Julio Santiago, Greg Bisson Tetrads: A Creative, Fun, Thought -Provoking Program Development Tool Rich DiGirolomo Laureus Model City: Values in Motion Jamie Schmill Are You ALL In? Aron Hall, Diane Ridderhoff, Felicia Barnhart, Sarah Braun Small -Town Recreation: Senior Trips A -Z and More! Cindy Hazelton, Lucky D'Ascanio Team Sports Participation Scouting Report Dustin Dobrin, Nick Rigitano The Inward, Outward and Onward Success of a Louisiana Mobile Outreach Program: BREC on the GEAUX Diane Drake, Michael King Re -LAX: Programming Youth Lacrosse in Your Community TonyAlbertina, Rachael Bishop REVENUE/CUSTOMER SERVICE Recreation: The 5 -Star Way Paul Shockley, Kari Bowman 10 Steps to Branding Your Park District's F&B Operation: A Case Study in Doubling Revenue Mike Holtzman Using Economic Impact Data to Demonstrate an Agency's Relevance Chris Nunes Topline Growth: Growing Golf Revenues in a Stagnant Market Adam Kempton, Bill Rehanek Grant Seeking That Scores Leigh Hersey RESEARCH Health and Quality of Life I How Do Different Aspects of Leisure Impact Broader Well -Being? Shintaro Kono, Gordon Walker Healthcare Costs Associated with Physical Activity: Evidence from U.S. Counties Mikihiro Sato, Yuhei Inoue, James Du Health and Quality of Life II Older Adults' Leisure Activities: Predictors of Social Relationships and Positive Affect Sunwoo Lee, Jungsu Ryu, Jinmoo Heo Leisure Perceptions and Attitudes toward Retirement Chungsup Lee, Jaesung An, Laura Payne Health and Quality of Life III Leisure, Social Support and Life Satisfaction among Individuals with Physical Disability Hyunmin Tim Yang Sports Related Serious Leisure and School Adaptation Chungsup Lee, Sohye Kim, Megan Owens, Toni Liechty Youth and Family I Using Observation to Improve Coach -Created Climate and Youth Development Eric Legg, Aubrey Newland Engaging Youth through High Quality Programming to Promote Outcome Achievement Troy Bennett Youth and Family II Impact Assessment of Youth Knowledge and Attitudes toward Water Safety: An Update William Ramos, Austin Anderson, Angela Beale Use of Motion Monitoring Devices and Its Influence on Level and Perception of Active Recreation among Families in Rural Communities Iryna Sharaievska, Jennifer Zwetsloot, Rebecca Battista Administration and Programming I Administrative Roles in Recreation Management: Testing a Model Jo An Zimmermann Toward Attachment: Motivation and Retention of Small Sporting Event Participants Keri Schwab, Morni Goldenberg, Kevin Lin, Paula Kreider Administration and Programming II Campus Recreation Outdoor Programs' Effect on College Students' Stress Reduction Yun Chang, Curt Davidson, Seann Conklin, Alan Ewert Significant Camp Experiences from Youth with Different Psychosocial Identity Statuses Cindy Hartman, Ann Gillard, Patti Craig Gender and Recreation (Re)productive Women in the (Re)creation Vocation Anna Mousolf Community Project with Women of La Capri, San Jose, Costa Rica: Photographic Documentation of Recreation Experiences in an Urban Setting Susana Juniu, Yuhei Inoue, Carmen Grace Salazar Solas ----------------------------------------------------------------- Register now at www.nrpa.org/Conference 111 LIU1011 HALL U16UL16UTS Try It Before You Buy It More than 400 exhibitors will be showcasing amazing new products and services. Exhibit Hall Happy Hour Stick around the Exhibit Hall for a fun -filled hour of socializing, testing new products, and enjoying food and beverages. Prizes and Cash Giveaways Visit the Exhibit Hall for hourly gift card giveaways (sponsored by Toro) and cash prize drawings during the Happy Hour. Mardi Gras Cash Bonanza The $2,000 cash grand prize will be given to one lucky attendee between 1:00 p.m. and 2:30 p.m. on Wednesday afternoon. You must be present to win so make sure you are in the exhibit hall Wednesday afternoon! Learning Playground The most interactive education sessions happen in the Learning Playground, where you will get out of your seat and collaborate with other attendees. EXPOdition Scavenger Hunt (sponsored by Burke Playgrounds) Complete the Exhibit Hall scavenger hunt for a chance to win iPads, FitBits, 2018 NRPA Annual Conference registrations, gift cards and more! ej) Greenfields Outdoor Fitness. Push Your Limits on Greenfields' Cross Fitness Rig! Greenfields brings new opportunities for high- intensity workouts to the outdoor environment with the 13 -Person Cross Fitness Rig. Dips. Pull- ups. Push-ups. Crunches. Leg raises. Knee raises. Wall ball. And more! The Rig rounds out Greenfields' multifaceted product line, providing exercises to advanced users. Embrace the challenge of functional fitness with Greenfields! X.9 ---------------------------------------------------------------- 12 1 Register now at www.nrpa.org/Conference HY SHOULD f ATTEND? • 75% of attendees come to network. Whether that means meeting new people, reconnecting with colleagues or learning from the best in the business, there are many opportunities to network. • You need to try it before you buy it, right? Visit the Exhibit Hall to test out amazing cutting edge equipment and products from top brands. • 88% of past attendees have been satisfied with their overall experience — you can be too! • Everyone will be there! Don't be left out of the largest annual gathering of park and recreation professionals under one roof. • With hundreds of top speakers, nearly 300 sessions and 11 education tracks, you are guaranteed to learn something new and leave inspired. JUSTIFI(ATION TIPS Sometimes travel budgets can be tight and it might be hard to convince your employer that it is important to attend a national conference. We want to see all of you at the NRPA Annual Conference, so we have put together some tips on how you can talk with your employer about the value of attending. 1. Review the education sessions and plan your schedule. Create an outline of the sessions you want to attend and how they'll support your work. Select sessions that are most beneficial to you, your team, community and your agency. Present this to your supervisors or those who are approving your travel. 2. Show value through CEUs. Education is paramount at the NRPA Annual Conference. Majority of sessions earn you CEU credits, so tally up the number of credits you will get for attending sessions and Pre -Conference Workshops to show the value of attending. 3. Share your great ideas. You are guaranteed to leave New Orleans inspired and filled with great ideas, so when discussing your attendance at the event, commit to a post -conference presentation for your team, town council, board, etc. Plan to highlight what you learned and tie your training to your organization's challenges, goals and strategic plans. For more tips and to download an approval request letter template, visit www.nrpa.org/Conference --------------------------------------------------------------- Register now at www.nrpa.org/Conference 115 AYS TO SAVE • Save up to $250 by registering before the Early Bird deadline, August 1. • NRPA Premier Member Agencies who purchase four full package registrations receive the fifth registration for FREE! • Become a member! Non-members receive one year of membership with registration. Members enjoy so many great benefits, even beyond the conference. • Volunteer and your registration fee can be greatly reduced or you may even be able to attend for free. • Get the most out of your trip by adding a Pre -Conference Workshop • R161STRATION [[IS ALL EDUCATION SESSIONS ✓ ✓ ✓ NRPA OPENING GENERAL SESSION ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ EXHIBIT HALL DAILY ADMISSION ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ NRPA RESEARCH POSTER SESSIONS ✓ ✓ ✓ NRPA OPENING RECEPTION ✓ ✓ ✓ EXHIBIT HALL HAPPY HOUR ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ EARLY BIRD: On or Before 81112017 Member $535 $435 $0 $145 $375 Non-member $765* $575* $95* $195 $375 REGULAR: After 81112017, Before 912412017 Member $695 $595 $0 $195 $395 Non-member $945* $765* $115* $245 $395 ONSITE: On or After 912412017 Member $735 $635 $0 $195 $405 Non-member $1015* $815* $150* $245 $405 *These nonmember registration fees automatically include individual membership to NRPA for one-year. ** Young Professionals are defined as anyone 35 years and younger. ***Students are defined as anyone who is currently enrolled as a full-time or part-time student pursuing a degree in parks, recreation, conservation, or related matters, and is not simultaneously employed as a full-time professional. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — - 16 1 Register now at www.nrpa.org/Conference HOVv` TO R161SILR ONLINE: www.nrpa.org/Conference PHONE OR FAX: P: 800.385.8010 F: 972.349.7715 HOTEL INE0Rr1Al1oN r MAI L: Print the paper form at www.nrpa.org/Conference "+r y. New Orleans Ernest N. Nbrial c Courtyard NO Downtown/Convention Yi'M %01 ! v. A"n r Convention Center Center r ' 0.1 miles from the Center L Embassy Suites NO Convention Center Hampton Inn &Suites NOConvention at r^. 0.1 miles from the Center Center Across the street from the Center Q ti Hilton New Orleans Riverside 0.4 miles from the Center Hyatt Place NO Convention Center Across the Street from the Center Le Ivbridien New Orleans Loews New Orleans Hotel 4 0.4 miles from the Center 0.4 miles from the Center " New Orleans Ivbmott Omni Riverfront New Orleans 0.7 miles from the Center � n r m 4 n � �ulra .rsr,� o SY r MAI L: Print the paper form at www.nrpa.org/Conference 19 DoubleTree by Hilton New Orleans 0.5 miles from the Center Hilton Garden Inn NO Convention Center 0.1 miles from the Center JW lvbrriottNew Or eans 0.7 miles from the Center New Orleans Downtown Ivbmott at the Convention Center Across the Streetfrom the Center Sheraton New Orleans Hotel 0.7 miles from the Center 1pSpringhill Suites byWrriottConvention Renaissance New Orleans Arts Residence Inn byWrriott New Orleans Center III Warehouse District Hotel - Downtown 0.1 miles from the Center 0.3 miles from Center 0.3 miles from the Center The Westin New Orleans Canal Place 0.6 miles from the Center r;3 e'rld.a & iouih.rn 41 "+r y. New Orleans Ernest N. Nbrial c Courtyard NO Downtown/Convention Yi'M %01 ! v. A"n r Convention Center Center fi 0.1 miles from the Center Embassy Suites NO Convention Center Hampton Inn &Suites NOConvention at r^. 0.1 miles from the Center Center Across the street from the Center Q 4 Hilton New Orleans Riverside 0.4 miles from the Center Hyatt Place NO Convention Center Across the Street from the Center Le Ivbridien New Orleans Loews New Orleans Hotel 4 0.4 miles from the Center 0.4 miles from the Center New Orleans Ivbmott Omni Riverfront New Orleans 0.7 miles from the Center 0.1 miles from the Center 19 DoubleTree by Hilton New Orleans 0.5 miles from the Center Hilton Garden Inn NO Convention Center 0.1 miles from the Center JW lvbrriottNew Or eans 0.7 miles from the Center New Orleans Downtown Ivbmott at the Convention Center Across the Streetfrom the Center Sheraton New Orleans Hotel 0.7 miles from the Center 1pSpringhill Suites byWrriottConvention Renaissance New Orleans Arts Residence Inn byWrriott New Orleans Center III Warehouse District Hotel - Downtown 0.1 miles from the Center 0.3 miles from Center 0.3 miles from the Center The Westin New Orleans Canal Place 0.6 miles from the Center r;3 e'rld.a & iouih.rn 41 "+r y. thr Nffjl rLr 0 c 9 Yi'M %01 ! v. A"n r TV-,, w fi Ernest N. Morial Convention Center 900 Convention Center Blvd. New Orleans, LA 70130 BOOK YOUR HOTEL ROOM Hotels will sell out quickly. Book your hotel reservation in the NRPA housing block as soon as you register. Online: www.nrpa.org/Conference By phone: 888.385.8010 To book a room in the NRPA block at certain hotels near the convention complex you must register for the conference first. For a list of these hotels, please visit www.nrpa.org/Conference NRPA reserves the right to cancel reservations in the official conference housing block if the occupants have not registered for the 2017 NRPA Annual Conference by August 25 For more details, visit www.nrpa.org/Conference ----------------------------------------------------------------- Register now at www.nrpa.org/Conference 117 18. EMPLOYEE EDUCATION AND TRAINING The City promotes staff development as an essential, ongoing function needed to maintain and improve cost effective quality service to residents. The purposes for staff development are to ensure that employees develop and maintain the knowledge and skills necessary for effective job performance and employees are provided with an opportunity for job enrichment. General Policies A. The City shall encourage training sessions involving employees of the same department or of similar job classifications where necessary to aid in work performance. B. Supervisors shall provide an orientation program for new employees. C. The immediate supervisor shall ensure training is provided for the operation of new equipment as required. D. The City encourages contact with personnel from other municipalities and public agencies in order to learn more efficient job procedures. E. The City encourages the use of in-house talents and skills in training as well as the expertise of local citizens, companies and agencies. F. Training that costs the City money must be approved in advance by the employee's supervisor. G. Upon completion of the training the supervisor may request a certificate of completion or a short summary by the employee. General Guidelines General guidelines for training where the City provides financial support and/or time off work are as follows: Work interference shall be minimal. 2. Training shall not duplicate recent training. 3. Training costs shall be within budgetary limits. 4. Preference shall be given to training that provides the most benefit to the City at the least cost. 5. The department head shall ensure that there is adequate coverage of departmental responsibilities before approving training applications. 6. Training shall relate to an employee's job or health/safety. 7. Efforts shall be made to distribute training equitably within a department. 8. Training shall be structured to provide information that will aid in an employee's growth or maintenance of professional standards. 9. Temporary, seasonal, casual part-time and intermittent employees shall be excluded unless approved by their department head. Safety training shall be provided to all employees. 10. If attendance is required at a seminar, the City will pay tuition/registration fees and hourly wages for all required hours of attendance. Expenses will be paid in accordance with standard practices. This applies to regular full-time and part-time employees. 11. Employees should be aware at all times that they are representing the City while attending any conference, meeting, class or outside training. Employees should conduct themselves as if they were at work. Improper conduct at any City authorized or sponsored event reflects poorly on the City and will be subject to disciplinary action as if it occurred during regular working hours. National and Regional Training To be approved for national or regional training sessions, the employees must meet the following requirements: Be employed as a regular full-time or benefit -earning part-time employee for a minimum of six (6) months with the City. 2. Training must be approved in advance by the City Council. 3. Training sessions will normally not exceed five (5) workdays. 4. Council may require an employee reimburse the City for airfare, hotel, and registration fees for an approved national or regional training event if the employee voluntarily terminates employment within six (6) months of completion of the training. The classes of employees eligible for national training sessions (out of the region) are the City Administrator and Department Heads. Exceptions may be approved by the City Administrator. All management and supervisory staff are eligible for regional training sessions in Wisconsin, Iowa, North Dakota, and South Dakota, assuming general guidelines of this policy are met. On an exception basis, non -supervisory staff may be approved for regional training by the City Administrator. Training Sessions Within Minnesota Professional and technical employees are eligible for training sessions held anywhere within the State of Minnesota assuming general guidelines of this policy are met. All employees are eligible for local training (Monticello, St. Cloud or the Twin Cities metro -area) under the same assumptions. Employees are expected to attend training sessions in the closest proximity to their work or home. Pavment or Reimbursement for Training Whenever possible employees should use their City Purchasing Card to pay for approved training and follow applicable procedures for substantiation of payment. If not possible, the City will pre -pay tuition or registration costs directly to the organization sponsoring the training. A copy of the conference or meeting agenda listing registration fees, meals included therein, and official starting and ending dates must be provided to the finance department with prepayment requests. Requests for reimbursement of training costs must include a copy of the conference or meeting agenda listing registration fees; meals included therein, official start and ending dates and proof of payment. Tuition Reimbursement Full-time and part-time benefited employees are eligible for tuition reimbursement for courses taken for credit at an approved post -high school educational institution subject to the following criteria: A. Courses must be directly related to the employee's present position (whether required for a degree program or not); or B. Courses must be directly related to a reasonable promotional opportunity in the same field of work as present position (whether part of a degree program or not). C. Courses must be approved in advance of the first day of class by the Department head and City Administrator in accordance with established procedures and the cost must be included in the approved City budget. The employee education request should cover any adjustment in the work schedule that may be necessary. D. Any costs other than tuition and course materials will not be reimbursed by the City. E. Employees are required to take courses outside of their work schedule whenever possible. All work schedule adjustments must be approved by the supervisor. The City will pay 50% of the cost of tuition and course materials upon successful completion (C grade), 75% reimbursement upon completion with a "B" or "A" grade. Courses taken "pass/fail" will be reimbursed at the same percentage as a C grade (if passed). All reimbursements will be prorated for benefit -earning part-time employees. The maximum reimbursement will be $1500 per year per employee, subject to budget limitations. Employees must reimburse the City if they voluntarily leave employment within twelve (12) months of reimbursement. Memberships and Dues The purpose of memberships to various professional organizations must be directly related to the betterment of the services of the City. Normally one City membership per agency, as determined by the City Administrator is allowed, providing funds are available. Upon separation of employment, when allowed by the professional organization, individual memberships paid for by the City will remain with the City and will be transferred to other employees by the department head. *For additional information regarding training and reimbursement procedures contact the Human Resources Manager or Finance Department. 19. TRAVEL AND REIMBURSEMENT POLICY Purpose The purpose of the travel and reimbursement policy is to establish uniform and consistent guidelines for the reimbursement of money spent on official city business. The guidelines were developed using City practices, State regulations, and State Auditor recommendations. The policy and procedures relative to such travel are contained in the following statement. Travel by City officials and employees to attend a professional or municipal association meeting is beneficial to progressive local government. A person engaged in such travel for the benefit of the City has a responsibility to keep accurate, substantiated records and to submit a request for reimbursement in accordance with this policy. Training Training must be approved in advance by the department head. All out-of-state training must be approved by the City Council. Whenever possible the City will prepay tuition or registration costs directly to the organization sponsoring the training. A copy of the conference or meeting agenda listing registration fees, meals included therein, and official starting and ending dates must be provided to the finance department with prepayment requests. If it is not possible to prepay tuition or registration cost the employee will be reimbursed the cost. Requests for reimbursement of training costs must include a copy of the conference or meeting agenda listing registration fees; meals included therein, official start and ending dates and proof of payment. Travel Mileage will be reimbursed at the current IRS mileage reimbursement rate. Reimbursable mileage will be the lesser of actual miles driven from normal work location to training/meeting/conference location or the actual miles traveled from departure location to destination less the mileage of commute to normal work location. If this results in the employee traveling less miles, the City will not reimburse the employee for mileage. When more than one City employee uses the same personal car for travel, reimbursement shall be based upon the IRS mileage reimbursement rate, payable to the owner of the vehicle. Out -Of -State Travel: All out-of-state travel must be approved by the City Council. A copy of the conference or meeting agenda listing registration fees, meals included therein, and official starting and ending dates must be provided. Airfare or train fare for out-of-state travel in coach or economy class or the lowest available fare shall be the preferred mode of transportation. When authorized, an employee may choose to drive their personal vehicle and will be reimbursed the current mileage rate or the cost of coach or economy class fare, priced at least 14 days in advance of the travel, whichever is less. If the employee travels by some other mode than by air, the additional time required over the time the air would require will be taken as vacation or compensatory time for full and part-time employees. Fire department personnel will not be reimbursed (paid) for extra time required for driving. Reimbursement for vehicular travel (meals, mileage, and lodging) shall not exceed what the total cost of what airline travel would have been. Local transportation such as taxicab and bus fares to and from airport, train station, lodging and conference, seminar or meeting is reimbursable only if circumstances require such travel. Receipts must be submitted for reimbursement. Costs for local transportation not pertaining directly to City business will not be reimbursed. Rental Vehicles: Reimbursement for the costs of renting a vehicle shall be made only when the necessity of such rental is for City purposes. Travel Credits: Whenever public funds are used to pay for travel or vehicle rental by an elected official or City employee, any credits or other benefits issued by the provider must accrue to the benefit of the City of Monticello. Request for reimbursement must include receipts or statements clearly stating dates and cost of travel fares paid and/or cost of the transportation paid. Reimbursement for rental vehicles must include dates of rental, vehicle type and fees paid. Meals The City will reimburse the elected official or City employee up to a maximum allowance of, $12.00 for breakfast, $20.00 for lunch and $25.00 for dinner, including sales tax and gratuities/tips, whichever is less, while on City business. The reimbursement for gratuity/tip should not exceed 15% of the total costs of reimbursable costs. Alcoholic beverages are not eligible for reimbursement. The limits do not apply when meal expense is included in the cost of the training, conference, or seminar. Additionally, the City does not reimburse cost on a per diem basis but for actual cost incurred. Itemized receipts must be submitted to qualify for reimbursement and must clearly state the date, name of the establishment (pre-printed form), itemized list of purchased items, total, and gratuity (if appropriate) of no more than 15%. Reimbursement request without a receipt or non -itemized credit card receipts will not be reimbursed. Elected officials or employees may occasionally be in the position of having to provide a meal for other persons who have official business with the City. In addition receipts for these meals must include the name of each person attending the meal along with a description of the public purpose/benefit of the meeting. The actual cost of the meals will be reimbursed in these instances however the cost of any alcoholic beverages will not be reimbursed. Lodgina, Hotel, motel or other authorized accommodations will be reimbursed at actual cost not to exceed the base occupancy rate and should be chosen based on reasonableness of cost and proximity to conference, meeting or training site. Each employee shall be allowed a base room. Unless previously approved by the City Administrator, overnight stays within 60 miles of the City will not be reimbursed. Detail lodging receipts must be submitted for reimbursement. The receipts must include the dates of the stay, nightly room rate and any incidental expenses charged. Only incidental costs related to the room charges will be reimbursed. Lodging costs, unless previously approved by the City Administrator, shall be reimbursable only from the night preceding a conference, seminar, or training through the night immediately following such event. Miscellaneous Expenses Hourly employees may receive overtime pay if the training/seminar/meeting hours including travel to/from exceed normal work hours. The employee's supervisor will approve all overtime prior to registering for the training/seminar/meeting. If the training/seminar/meeting hours including travel to/from are less than the normal work hours employees will use vacation or compensatory time to achieve normal work hours. Employees will be paid eight (8) hours of paid for training/seminar/meeting, which require overnight stays. Telephone expenses incurred will be reimbursed only when their necessity for City purpose is fully accounted for. Reimbursable parking is limited to daily parking at destination business (meeting, conference, training, etc.) site and/or hotel site (when applicable). Valet parking and all other parking are not allowable. Detail receipts including date, times and costs of parking should be provided when requesting reimbursement. Gratuities/tips for service providers may be reimbursed as long as reasonable and serve the public purpose of the trip. Non -Reimbursable Expenses The City shall not pay for any expenses, of which the costs are included in the registration fees. Costs for alcoholic beverages shall not be reimbursed. The City shall pay no expenses for a spouse/guest who accompanies the city official/employee to a conference, seminar, or meeting including the incremental lodging expenses of occupancy rates over base occupancy rates. The City will not reimburse for personal telephone calls, rental of luxury vehicles, or recreational expenses such as golf or tennis unless included as part of the registration fees or previously approved by the City Administrator. Reimbursement Process To apply for reimbursement, an elected official/City employee must complete an "Employee Reimbursement Voucher" form. The completed form with expenditures totaled, detailed original receipts attached, and signed should be submitted to the Department Head, who shall review and approve (by signing) such request. The Department Head shall forward the request to the Finance Department for reimbursement. The Finance Department will review the report and supporting documentation for completeness and accuracy. If complete the reimbursement check will be processed during the next regular accounts payable processing. If the request is not complete or supporting data does not meet policy guidelines, the request will be returned to the employee. Any exceptions to this policy must receive approval from the City Administrator whenever practicable prior to the conference, seminar or training. City Council Agenda — 06/26/2017 2K. Consideration of a request Development Stage Planned Unit Development and Preliminary Plat for Spaeth Industrial Park for a multi -lot industrial development in an 1-2 (Heavv Industrial) District. Applicant: Spaeth, Ken (NAC/AS) Property: Legal: Lot 2, Block 3, Oakwood Industrial Park PID: 155018003020 Planning Case Number: 2017-017 A. REFERENCE & BACKGROUND: Request(s): Subdivide an existing 4.4 acre industrial parcel along the south side of Dundas Road into eight separate parcels, each accommodating a single building and parking bay, along with easement access to common truck circulation areas, utilities, stormwater management, and access drives. Deadline for Decision: July 7th, 2017 Land Use Designation: Places to Work Zoning Designation: I-2, Heavy Industrial The purpose of the "I-2," Heavy Industrial District is to provide for the establishment of heavy industrial and manufacturing development and use which because of the nature of the product or character of activity requires isolation from residential or commercial use Overlays/Environmental Regulations Applicable: NA Current Site Use: Vacant Surrounding Land Uses: North: Industrial East: Industrial South: Multi -family Residential West: Industrial Project Description: The applicant is proposing a multi -lot and building industrial park. Each building is 6,976 square feet in area, for a cumulative total of 55,808 square feet of floor area. Because only the front two parcels front on City Council Agenda — 06/26/2017 Dundas Road, with 6 parcels served by an internal private common drive, the project requires PUD zoning. The layout of the project relies on a perimeter drive that provides access to, alternatively, parking areas serving the front access points of the buildings, then common truck courts that provide truck access to the service sides of each building. The parking and "front" access areas face outward to the north and south of the parcel, including toward Dundas Road on the north, and toward a stormwater pond and then the residential development to the south. The truck and service portions of each of the buildings is internal to the project. The project is anticipated to attract smaller individual industrial concerns that require spaces for office, fabrication, repair, warehousing, and possibly, limited areas of showroom. Occupants would have the opportunity to purchase individual lots subject to the overall PUD and association management requirements. Each building has about 12 parking spaces allocated to their parcel, however, it will be necessary that the parking and grounds will be commonly maintained under an association, so parking quantities would be shared between parcels. ANALYSIS This project was reviewed as a Concept Planned Unit Development proposal earlier this spring. The proposed Preliminary Plat and Development Stage PUD plans follow the layout of the concept plan. Traffic will enter the one-way perimeter drive aisle on the west side of the property, and enter the parking bays, or truck courts, as appropriate. Typically, the parking bays will provide access to the front entry/office spaces for each of the buildings. The truck court areas will provide access for delivery vehicles or company trucks, etc. to overhead doors for loading and unloading purposes. Exiting traffic will circulate to the east side of the property to leave via the one-way exit lane. Because the perimeter lanes are designed for one-way traffic only, at 20 feet in width, it will be important to properly sign the site to ensure that the drives will function as designed. "Enter Only" or "Exit Only" signs, as well as pavement markings, should be planned to direct traffic as needed. The City Engineer has provided comment on the applicant's circulation plan. City Council Agenda — 06/26/2017 As the site circulation relies on clear routes for the fully -developed parcel, it will be important that no outdoor storage occurs on the parcels as platted. This would include trash disposal, which should be handled indoors. For large vehicles to meet turning movements in and out of the truck courts, they must remain clear of obstruction. As a note, the applicant should update the truck -turning templates to show full-size semi -trucks in and out of the truck court areas - the current template follows the center -line, which limits truck turning. It is expected that there is adequate room using the full width of the truck court, but this should be verified by the applicant. Other staff analysis of the proposal includes the following: Landscapinz. Quantities for landscaping are consistent with the City's general landscape requirements, and include a planting of spruce trees along the south boundary which will screen the use from the abutting residential area. Combined with the ponding area in this location, the plan meets the separation requirements of the bufferyard regulations (at least 20 feet). Those standards also include a requirement for complete landscaping screen. As such, the spruce trees should be no more than 12 feet on center to accomplish this requirement. This would result in a total planting of 25 spruce trees, increased from the 17 proposed. Because the office face of the buildings faces south, and keeps truck operations to the truck court, the building will screen the truck activity, and potential impacts are lessened with this design. One note regarding the landscape materials - staff would suggest replacing River Birch in the rear area with something more long-lived. Birch trees tend to fail much earlier than other overstory trees. Parking. Automobile parking is provided at an average of one space per 581 sf gross, plus truck court temporary space for loading. This ratio should be more than adequate for these buildings, which would do very limited retail customer traffic. Siznaze. The applicant has planned for wall signage, but has not provided specific drawings. Because only two of the planned eight buildings would face Dundas Road, the front entry of each building would be considered to be the "front" for sign purposes. At 15% of building fagade, each building would be allowed approximately 260 square feet of wall signage. The applicant should specify a common signage plan (showing locations and sizes of allowable signs with the PUD) as a condition, to be provided as part of Final PUD approval. Buildin-a Desijzn/Materials. The applicant has proposed metal buildings for each of the eight building in the project. A masonry, cultured stone, wainscot is shown on the "front" (Dundas Road) side of the northernmost buildings, and the south entry side of the southernmost buildings. The sides and truck -court "rear" of each building, as 3 City Council Agenda — 06/26/2017 well as the entry walls of the four middle buildings, show a metal wainscot with an alternative color. Lizhtinz. The applicant has planned for wall -mounted lighting, with a downcast cover to avoid glare onto adjoining property. The photometric plan shows zero or 0.1 foot-candles readings at the west, north, and east property lines, and the southern stormwater pond separates the lighting from the nearest residential property. Fixture specification also meet code requirements. Plat. The proposed plat includes a total of eight lots, each containing one building. As noted previously, each of the lots will be served by a private drive that encircles the project. Lot sizes range from just under 20,400 square feet to just over 32,000 square feet in area. Only lots I and 2 front on a public street (Dundas Road). The two southernmost lots are the largest, and include the stormwater pond and buffer plantings, an area of approximately 20,000 square feet between the two parcels. The layout of the plat requires the creation of an association responsibility for common maintenance of private property. Cross parking and access would be a component of the covenants applicable under this PUD to ensure continued accessibility and operation. The easements and declarations should be subject to review and approval by the City Attorney. Staff notes that there is a question regarding the south boundary line of the property. A narrow strip of land abuts the property between the Oakwood Industrial Park properties and the Klein Farms land to the south. Staff has asked the applicant to verify the legal description of the proposal as a condition of plat approval. After further research and discussion, the applicant has provided a revised preliminary plat adjusting the southern boundary line to reflect the accurate boundary of the proposed plat area. The revised plat reflects slightly reduced lot areas for Lots 7 and 8 given the boundary line adjustment. The City Engineer's comments relating to the civil components of the plat are detailed in a separate letter. The City Engineer has made detailed comments relating to the proposed stormwater management. The applicant will be required to provide detailed information on maintenance of the system as part of a stormwater maintenance agreement and within the cross easement and maintenance agreement for the development. To accommodate these and other requirements of the PUD, the applicant will be required to execute a development agreement relating to PUD approvals, including an incorporation of the phasing elements of the project. Finally, the applicant will need to work with the City Building and Street departments to arrange addressing and mailbox requirements for the project. L! City Council Agenda — 06/26/2017 Planning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission reviewed this item and held a public hearing on the requests on June 6th, 2017. The Commission heard from the applicant's representatives regarding the need for multi -tenant and multi -use buildings as proposed with the project. The Commission also verified that a bufferyard standard would be required to be met on the south line; staff noted the condition requiring an increased number of tree plantings along the south line. Further, the Commission confirmed with the applicant that the buildings facing Dundas Road and the south boundary will include the masonry wainscot, while the buildings internal to the site will have a color differentiation in material, not the masonry wainscot. No members of the public provided comment during the public hearing. After discussion, the Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the development stage PUD and preliminary plat as proposed, with conditions as noted in Exhibit Z. The Commission also recommended approval of the rezoning to PUD, which Council will be asked to consider with final stage PUD and final plat requests, to come at a later date. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: The Planning Commission recommends Alternative 1 below for both Decisions. Decision 1—Development Stage PUD approval. 1. Motion to approve the the proposed Development Stage PUD for the Spaeth Industrial Park, based on the findings in Resolution No. PC -2017-012, and subject to the conditions of Exhibit Z of the Staff report. 2. Motion to deny approval of the Development Stage PUD for the Spaeth Industrial Park, based on findings to be made by the City Council. 3. Motion to table the resolution, subject to submission of additional information. Decision 2 — Preliminary Plat approval for Spaeth Industrial Park. 1. Motion to approve the Preliminary Plat for Spaeth Industrial Park as revised and dated, based on the findings in Resolution No. PC -2017-013, and subject to the conditions of Exhibit Z of the Staff report. 5 City Council Agenda — 06/26/2017 2. Motion to deny approval of the preliminary plat for Spaeth Industrial Park, based on findings to be made by the City Council. 3. Motion to table the resolution, subject to submission of additional information. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the PUD and Preliminary Plat as submitted, Alternative 1 for each of the two decisions. The proposed layout is designed to provide an opportunity for small businesses to establish themselves in the Monticello market by creating buildings that can be owned by individual businesses. Expanding the market for such businesses is consistent with the intent of the Economic Development objectives of the City's Comprehensive Plan. By designing the project as proposed, the project is also consistent with the City's interest in protecting residential neighborhoods from industrial intrusions. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Resolution PC -2017-012 B. Resolution PC -2017-013 C. Draft, Ordinance No. 6XX, Spaeth Industrial Park PUD (to be considered for adoption with final plat and final stage PUD) D. Aerial Site Image E. Applicant Narrative F. PUD Development Plans, including: a. Project Location Plan, Title b. Site Plan c. Grading and Drainage Plan d. Sanitary & Water Utility Plan e. Landscape Plan f. SWPPP g. Existing Conditions and Removals Plan h. Details i. Phasing Plan j. Elevations k. Floor Plan 1. Photometrics G. Preliminary Plat H. Revised Preliminary Plat, dated June 13th, 2017 I. ALTA Survey J. Fire Truck Circulation Plan K. Fire Hydrant Coverage Plan L. Stormwater Calculations, online only M. City Engineer's Letter, dated May 31, 2017 Z. Conditions of Approval G City Council Agenda — 06/26/2017 EXHIBIT Z Spaeth Industrial Park — PUD Zoning and Preliminary Plat PID 155018003020 Lot 2, Block 3, Oakwood Industrial Park 1. Research and revise the Plat and PUD plans as necessary based on the issues raised by the south boundary line with Klein Farms Estates 2nd Addition. 2. As a part of the Final PUD application, provide a Sign Plan for the PUD consistent with City code requirements. 3. Prepare a site circulation signage plan for entry, exiting, and pavement markings as approved by the City Engineer. 4. Prepare cross -access and parking easements and maintenance covenants, and enter into a development agreement with the City, meeting the requirements of the City Attorney for maintenance and required improvements. 5. Update the circulation plan to show full truck turning movements consistent with the comments in the staff report. 6. Verify internal trash handling equipment, and prohibit outdoor storage as a part of the project PUD approvals. 7. Coordinate addressing and mailbox installations with City Building and Streets departments. 8. Increase south bufferyard planting as noted in the staff report. 9. Compliance with the terms and requirements of the City Engineer's report. 10. Compliance with the comments of other staff and Planning Commission. 7 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2017-012 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A REZONING TO "SPAETH INDUSTRIAL PARK PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT" AND DEVELOPMENT STAGE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR SPAETH INDUSTRIAL PARK WHEREAS, the applicant owns property along Dundas Road, PID No. 15501800302; and WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted a request to rezone its property to PUD, subdivide it into eight parcels, and develop it as a common industrial project; and WHEREAS, the applicant concurrently proposes to develop the property for industrial uses; and WHEREAS, the site is guided for industrial uses under the label "Places to Work" in the City's Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the proposed PUD, along with the companion Plat, are consistent with the long-term use and development of the property for industrial uses; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on June 6, 2017 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: 1. The PUD provides an appropriate means of furthering the intent of the Comprehensive Plan for the site by putting the existing and proposed buildings to industrial use. 2. The proposed improvements on the site under the Development Stage PUD are consistent with the needs of the PUD in this location as an industrial area. 3. The improvements will have expected impacts on public services, including sewer, water, stormwater treatment, and traffic which have been planned to serve the property for the development as proposed. 4.. The PUD flexibility for the project, including parcels without public street frontage, are consistent with the intent of the City's economic development objectives, as well as with the intent of the PUD zoning regulations. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2017-012 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, that the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the Monticello City Council approves the Rezoning and Development Stage PUD, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit Z as follows: 1. Research and revise the Plat and PUD plans as necessary based on the issues raised by the south boundary line with Klein Farms Estates 2nd Addition. 2. As a part of the Final PUD application, provide a Sign Plan for the PUD consistent with City code requirements. 3. Prepare a site circulation signage plan for entry, exiting, and pavement markings as approved by the City Engineer. 4. Prepare cross -access and parking easements and maintenance covenants, and enter into a development agreement with the City, meeting the requirements of the City Attorney for maintenance and required improvements. 5. Update the circulation plan to show full truck turning movements consistent with the comments in the staff report. 6. Verify internal trash handling equipment, and prohibit outdoor storage as a part of the project PUD approvals. 7. Coordinate addressing and mailbox installations with City Building and Streets departments. 8. Increase south bufferyard planting as noted in the staff report. 9. Compliance with the terms and requirements of the City Engineer's report. 10. Compliance with the comments of other staff and Planning Commission. ADOPTED this 6th day of June, 2016, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION 2 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2017-012 Brad Fyle, Chair ATTEST: Angela Schumann, Community Development Director CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2017-013 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR SPAETH INDUSTRIAL PARK WHEREAS, the applicant owns property along Dundas Road, PID No. 15501800302;and WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted a request to plat said property into eight parcels, and develop it as a common industrial project under a PUD; and WHEREAS, the applicant concurrently proposes to develop the property for industrial uses; and WHEREAS, the site is guided for industrial uses under the label "Places to Work" in the City's Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the proposed PUD, along with the companion Plat, are consistent with the long-term use and development of the property for industrial uses; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on June 6, 2017 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: 1. The Plat provides an appropriate means of furthering the intent of the Comprehensive Plan for the site by putting the existing and proposed buildings to industrial use. 2. The proposed improvements on the site under the Preliminary Plat are consistent with the needs of the development in this location as an industrial area. 3. The improvements will have expected impacts on public services, including sewer, water, stormwater treatment, and traffic which have been planned to serve the property for the development as proposed. 4.. The PUD flexibility for the project, including parcels without public street frontage, are consistent with the intent of the City's economic development objectives, as well as with the intent of the PUD zoning regulations. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2017-013 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, that the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the Monticello City Council approves the Preliminary Plat for Spaeth Industrial Park, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit Z of the staff report as follows: 1. Research and revise the Plat and PUD plans as necessary based on the issues raised by the south boundary line with Klein Farms Estates 2nd Addition. 2. As a part of the Final PUD application, provide a Sign Plan for the PUD consistent with City code requirements. 3. Prepare a site circulation signage plan for entry, exiting, and pavement markings as approved by the City Engineer. 4. Prepare cross -access and parking easements and maintenance covenants, and enter into a development agreement with the City, meeting the requirements of the City Attorney for maintenance and required improvements. 5. Update the circulation plan to show full truck turning movements consistent with the comments in the staff report. 6. Verify internal trash handling equipment, and prohibit outdoor storage as a part of the project PUD approvals. 7. Coordinate addressing and mailbox installations with City Building and Streets departments. 8. Increase south bufferyard planting as noted in the staff report. 9. Compliance with the terms and requirements of the City Engineer's report. 10. Compliance with the comments of other staff and Planning Commission. ADOPTED this 6th day of June, 2016, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION 2 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2017-013 Brad Fyle, Chair ATTEST: Angela Schumann, Community Development Director ORDINANCE NO.6XX CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 10 OF THE MONTICELLO CITY CODE, KNOWN AS THE ZONING ORDINANCE, BY ESTABLISHING THE SPAETH INDUSTRIAL PARK PUD AS A ZONING DISTRICT IN THE CITY OF MONTICELLO, AND REZONING THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY FROM I-2, HEAVY DISTRICT TO SPAETH INDUSTRIAL PARK PUD, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: LOT 2 BLOCK 3, OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO HEREBY ORDAINS: Section 1. Section 2.4(0) — Planned Unit Developments, Title 10 — Zoning Ordinance is hereby amended by adding the following: (XX) Spaeth Industrial Park PUD District (a) Purpose. The purpose of the Spaeth Industrial Park PUD District is to provide for the development of certain real estate subject to the District for industrial land uses. (b) Permitted Uses. Permitted principal uses in the Spaeth Industrial Park PUD District shall be indoor industrial uses as found in the I-2, Heavy Industrial District of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance, subject to the approved Final Stage Development Plans dated , and development agreement dated , 2017, as may be amended. The introduction of any other use from any district, including Conditional Uses in the I-2 District, shall be reviewed under the requirements of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 2, Section (0) — Planned Unit Developments for Development Stage PUD and Final Stage PUD.. (c) Accessory Uses. Accessory uses shall be those commonly accessory and incidental to industrial uses, and as specifically identified by the approved final stage PUD plans, but shall not include outdoor storage or other activities. (d) District Performance Standards. Performance standards for the development of any lot in the Spaeth Industrial Park PUD District shall adhere to the approved final stage PUD plans and development agreement. In such case where any proposed improvement or use is not addressed by the Final Stage PUD, then the regulations of the I-2, ORDINANCE NO.6XX Heavy Industrial District shall apply. (e) Amendments. Where changes to the PUD are proposed in the manner of use, density, site plan, development layout, building size, mass, or coverage, or any other change, the proposer shall apply for an amendment to the PUD under the terms of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance, Section 2.4 (0)(10). The City may require that substantial changes in overall use of the PUD property be processed as a new project, including a zoning district amendment. Section 2. The zoning map of the City of Monticello is hereby amendment to rezoned the following described parcels from I-2, Heavy Industrial District to Spaeth Industrial Park PUD, Planned Unit Development District: Lot 2, Block 3, Oakwood Industrial Park Addition to Monticello (subject to the replat as Lots 1-8, Block 1, Spaeth Industrial Park). Section 3. The City Clerk is hereby directed to mark the official zoning map to reflect this ordinance. The map shall not be republished at this time. Section 4. The City Clerk is hereby directed to make the changes required by this Ordinance as part of the Official Monticello City Code, Title 10, Zoning Ordinance, and to renumber the tables and chapters accordingly as necessary to provide the intended effect of this Ordinance. The City Clerk is further directed to make necessary corrections to any internal citations that result from said renumbering process, provided that such changes retain the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance as has been adopted. Section 5. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage and publication. The ordinance in its entirety and map shall be posted on the City website after publication. Copies of the complete Ordinance and map are available online and at Monticello City Hall for examination upon request. ADOPTED BY the Monticello City Council this day of , 2017. ATTEST: Jeff O'Neill, Administrator Brian Stumpf, Mayor 2 ORDINANCE NO.6XX AYES: NAYS: Spaeth, Ken - Request for Rezoning to PUD, Development Stage PUD, & Preliminary Plat created by: city of Monticello Lot 2, Block 3 Oakwood Industrial Park 1155-018-003020 1 107 Dundas Road f % 2401 15506000,1030 —1,5 5060001'040 1.55018DD2120 ° ' 1..550.1800211 D 1 '5060001020 1.55060001050 5506000.1010 DUN D 1 155018 - ;1'S523000001'0�,.. M 550 20 1155018003,0030 LU t I Cp:r-:�1 '' A "MR 30L�EN EAGLE Lir--,.... .._ f •i , T •+ yr lJt m. arca ! 3 1 J LU D �� -j Q� 'm�^551:330165 LV Z 1~ !r Z f m 1F l: 155098000030 p C EARMSTEADsDR 7-F 415518800100101 � r + 15509300002 • t At .11 Ken Spaeth Masonry 108 Meadowlark Rd. Se. St. Michael, MN 56557 612-889-3100 05-05-2017 City of Monticello The purpose of the project is to provide individuals or small companies with a land option where they can own or lease a building that makes it affordable for their business. The project would have small lots that will allow them to construct a 4,000-6000 sq. ft. building. The goal is to provide a cost-effective option that they can have ownership while keeping their payments to 3-4000.00 per month. The clients are anticipated to be small businesses that need an office and warehouse. Could be construction related or small business. There is a very strong need for this in the Monticello area without any current options. There are not many comparables for this type project. Pfeifer property management in Buffalo has something similar and it is full. The difference is that his buildings are only available for lease. He does not offer the option of a lot sale. His tenants are plumbers, electricians, computer I.T. and other small business owners. A PUD is required, for the subject property, because the project will have a private street vs. a public street. The requirements for public street would use up too much of the property. Also, a city street is more expensive and the goal is to keep the project affordable. The project will be governed by an association agreement that lease tenants and properties that are owner occupied will have to abide by. The concept is to not have a semi -truck park, but the site is designed to accommodate limited truck traffic. We don't anticipate any loading docks. The buildings will be post -frame buildings with 2 -tone metal cladding. Any building sides facing Dundas street will have a brick or stone wainscoat up 3-4 ft. We will bring sewer and water in from Dundas with individual meters for each tenant. Storm water will be handled on site. We realize that there are townhomes to the south of the project. We have a very extensive landscape plan for this area with a berm and trees. We will also have a chain link fence across the back of the property. Around the buildings we'll have a 3 ft. wide area for landscape rock and on the street side have shrubs. All grass areas will be sodded. All landscaped areas will be irrigated. I expect the project could take 3-4 years to complete. My goal is to own 2-3 buildings myself and sell the remaining lots to owner occupied users. My intent is to provide a small business park that both the city of Monticello and myself can be proud of. Thanks for your time. Ken Spaeth \KITTSON ROSEAU 1 South Haven Southsldel r_ —L1n MARSHALL PENNINGTON RED LAKE r LAKE OF HEODS KOOCHICHING BELTRAM f0XKITASGA CASS BECKER NORMAN MANN- IOMEN , ,,,,, � CLAY SWIFT CASS BECKER PARLE N y , ,,,,, � AITI{IN �o CRQYY__ WING OTTER TAIL I- TODD 4RAN Tb01J-aLA-L= NILL.E %19 MOR RI SON 1 Cs ENT 4N - f� POPE � ST EARNS �y O 11R ISANTI - SWIFT 0 A LO WRIG LAC HIPPEWA� *r4�`� HENN QUI PARLE N y , ,,,,, ARVER RENVILLE rA. CARLTON PINE F RAMSEY WASHINGTON I SIEILEY OOt>HLIE LYON LE EDW.. (COLLET UELIR RIDE BROWN F 10L,MIIRRgY `WOOD "T".EARTH`��rOa 5` 4s O RQClr�OBLES * MARTIN F MOWER P ° lite V MINNESOTA C.Iea orinna 1 I � � IAiddle-ville-Tw .ac Hovra rd; La ke 1717' aarwater Creek Tvrp WINO NlnntiC2llUTwp IaapleLakle Tvrp eke Buffialc Twp 5t. Mich atham Tvrp_C-Buffalo rd Twp ■ paianal Franklin Turps * �. WRIGHT COUNTY SITE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA w �,c Cn r., "Q M o kn c ct O N ct a o v� V �z Cng CL Zi W 0 Ld � U O W U O ct CL CL z 0 N O DOQ W Q � v INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: 0 o a v CO PROJECT LOCATION PLAN FILE NO. 00640 C1 SITE PLAN C2 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN C3 SANITARY AND WATER UTILITY PLAN C4 STORM SEWER UTILITY PLAN C5 LANDSCAPE PLAN C6 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN co C7 EXISTING CONDITIONS AND REMOVALS PLAN C8 DETAILS C9 PHASING PLAN Proiect Location Plan I I ROADDUNDASI I I i i I u 15" R. C.P. ► ► ► ► ► ► i Q; ► ► o �; ► ► a; ► ► ► 11,0 ► i ; cl: ` SAN MH 00 RIM ELEV.=960.04 SAN MH' BUILDING �- �' 11 1p INV. ELEV.=942.8 RIM ELEV.=961.96 SETBACK LINE `° + + + INV. ELEV.=943.7 1 + + + + 30' FRONT 00' 0" E Plat) + + + + + + „ �' \+ + o 4 o �1 + + +' �> N 88°3 53 E a ` ' h 1+ + +; s 14--T-`V- TFL RISER _ �, T T-• T- l C -T T T T 1 -T __ T T T T T T T 20.01- �- L. �3� ► 20 14 1 - 300. 0-- . - - - 14 Y ?--6.0+ + f _ _ I___r__T__T_ t __T+ f _ {�J +-+ \ �+ FLS+ - + + + + + + + \+ + + rn + + + ... + + + + + + + + + + 1+ + + + + + + +1 1 + + ++ + + + + + + + + +o �" + + + + + + + 1 + + 4 +' + + + + + + 1 1+ + + i~ + + + + + 9 `+ + + + + + + + + + + + 9 + + + + + + + + �?' + + p + +I 13 l + + + + + O + + 4 + + '+_I T)o + + + + + + + r + + + + + + _-J 7 + + + �+ +o+ + �'� + + , + +o + + +�+ + + + + + E,1E 1T+ +- T + �. + + + +0+ + , + +l+ , i, \+ + -+ + +►-9.0 --r j +� + +I . + + + \+ + + �+++ ++r0i + + o + +� + + + + + + + + + + ;+ I 5 ` + + +1N + + + + + + + 5 3 6 + + OII �; + +1 O w 1 + I +tr IN,�I + +I _ ren = -- _ _ �f s- -� _ + CD + Y + �1. - -ter -�. �= 18- _ -- �,. _ Il I _b w. �a �� { + + 1 Q 'r+_ + II + + + (n BUILDING ;+++1 ++� j 1 109 109 j a +++I+++ BUILDING SETBACK LINE � I+�+++ I o �' + +I +' •�+I + � I � +++� SETBACK LINE 15 EXISTING +++++'� I �`+++I++ ' 15 EXISTING INTERIOR SIDE *++I+++� I I �;+++I++ INTERIOR SIDE ++1+++ BUILDING A 5.0 BUILDING B t + +1+ + + I 6, 9 76 SF 5.0-- 6,9 76 SF j + + + o I+ +� I LOT 2 I �I+++�+++; ++++ LOT 1 -20.0 t++µ++ 23, 094 SF '+ + ,+ + 23,100 SF + 1+ +1 �-+20.0 0.53 AC 0.53 AC -'o•I +36.0----T-,- N, ' \ ;,-6.0+ o °-0-0-0-0-o-0'"O•-o'og000 + + + \ I+ = 10.0 t„ ,� a v-o-o-o-O-O-o"o"o"'0o o 0 0 0 o o O o 0_0_0_0 _ Im. \ I A v v u -O -O -O -O -O -O -O O-Oma¢°O°O�O°O°O°O 0`00 0�0�00000,•O O O O O O O_O_O_O_t` -'�� + I +;• u O -O -O -O -O -O -O -OHO -O O O O,.O O,.,O..O,.O.. O..O O_ O O 1�c'TI�+ I' �r�36.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 n r T T + ++ +��+ + + + + + + + + + + t + + I 13 �; I+ �� + + + + + + + + +�+ + + + I+ +I + + + + + + + + + + +�++ o * +I= ;+ + 0+--�-�- + + + + + + + + +o +a+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 2 + + + + + + + +; m 13 1 +I+ +�'r + + + 2 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + I ,+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + o+ + + + + + + + + + + 1 + + + ... + + + + + + +1 I j + + + + + + + T + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + f 1+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +11 = 14 d 1 •, + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +' + + + + . + + + + + 1 . , T T T + + + + + F I' d :+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + I 14 T I+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +' + + + + . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + I+ r I+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +1 +1+ + + + + + + + + + + + + 1 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +++++++++++ + + + + + + + + + 4 I+ + + + + + + +T4" + + + + + + + o+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + ++ 2 + + + + + + + + +, + + + + + + + + + + + + +r+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ++ + + + + + + + + 0 ++ + + + + + ++ + + + + + + 0' + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ++ + + + + + +� + + + +1p + + + + + + + + + + + + + +-+ T I + + __.__., + - + -+ + �F - F --4 - --+ + + + + f + I+ + + ,d' + + --fi --r-- r -T - + �- + + + + + + I+ v ° 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0"0 0 - O v o"o I -o!- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0°0°0°0°0°0°0°0°o°o9n°O „o 0 0 0 0.0.0.0.0 v� ++I++ I+v o 0 0-0-0-0 0 0 0 0 0,^0 D o g 0 0 0 0 0 ��'" + + + +y,+ vOOvOOn 0�0o^o_^o_;0D0Dogogogogogo o O O O O O_ O _ Il O 1� f I + + MOW --- I 1 + + + • LOT 4 1 LF + {}VIII+ + + + LOT 3 j 1+ I + LINE I + +++g I 20,390 SF IF+++I+++ �_--MOW ++++++� j 20 400 SF +1 + 0.47 AC 0.47 AC I III + +I + 1 I LINE +++ �+++ ++I+++� I BUILDING C --5•o BUILDING D++++++ I i I �}• F I �I I I I +++I+++ 5.0-- 6, 976 SF I+++1+++ I ++I+++ 6,976 SF + ' �+ + + 11 ,+ +I� I I *+� C�C.1�7 F_NCE i + 2 .6. 0} 4++ C�*, Ej +\- 0 109 9�9 ,+-.- +I + ; +``-35.9 Q + + n �E 109 - I �+ + 36.0 d '• T' I l• . + + +I I .. �/� C A _ _' i _* - - - s,c 87 r .rte 7\\\D - - - - ---- - I + '!l, - 1 +�+-20.0--h I �„ _ _._ _ ,- - - � - - 7 + +t , +"� + + + + + + + I' I ' + l +I41 ;+ + I; I �+ + + + ( 8 )r +� + + 3 0 0 + + +;++++++ 3 23 T +p1 + +ry� '� 00 1 + + II ' t + + i 6 + + + ,+ + + + + + + +5 + T r + + + I CC) 0 I+ + I I VD+ + '' r + + + + + +1 + + + + + + + + + I + + + + +1 I C) ^ rn 1 + \� + + + , + + + + + + + + + ± + _ + + + ,-T + �p + 1 '\ O I+ + 00+++ +,Q3f-t++++ - 7 - - -+ ; +T+T+T--�-�N ++- ++ + 1 +++++++. 7 +++++++ g +++ �5+++++++ O ++I -(+ + + +'� + + + + 9 +1+ + + + ++o+ + + + + -+ + + + IT I, 14 d a 14 I 1 T T + + + + + + + + + i + + + + T + + 9 + + + + + + + + + + o + 4 o•+ 1 + ;h I �c ° , I ' 9 N 7 II I I I I I I I I I Gp� + 1��+ + + ^� + + + + + + + + 7 + + + o��T_-;---r- +-+--- + + + + + + + '�.� + + w"-----CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER +\- 1 + + '� + + + +I + +{�� + + + + + + + + + + + + + + �; 5.1 FT. EAST OF LOT LINE 1++ ++++ 1 >, + +++ + 5 + +9k.0 +o ++ ++ + ++ ++ 5 6 + ++ +++ +++ +23 I+ +++I++ Ii �- I 3 + 12 I+ + + 4 I ; 1 + 3 + 6 + + F + + + 8 + F + + 11 III + + +1 o~ 2 �3 + + \ 8 + + +o o + + + + \ r-�l 11 + I+ 1; 12++I+++ I +�n - r _.�+.._+ - zYl��_i�•=e�r ----r�F'"t 'r_ 7- - - +++++ -� q 1 + I+ + 1 c } ' I II + O iF + + I '- - 11 + + + O f1 _ + + + 109 II + 1+I c}- +1+ I 109 v, ;111+ +1+11 �o CHAINLINK --- ++1+++ o ; +++++ ; o � 00 N o FENCE + \- 1 + + + i ;I + I+ I O o } +1+A 11 + + +•- ON LOT LINE. 1+ + , �} + + + I it + + +-111 O , Q O ++1+++ 1 BUILDING E ��--5.o BUILDING F ' + +1 + ;; COII O 0 + + + j 6, 9 76 SF 5.0- 6,976 SF ';I + + + + +;; k++A LOT 6 III+ +11 1++ i LOT 5 ;II+++11 + t + 20.0 1 + + +� 20,384 SF ' 1++6.0 1 I 20, 400 SF ;�20 0 �� I 0.47 AC 9i 1 -35.9-++ '1' �___5.1 + \- i 0.47 AC + _ v v u O O O O O O O O O O��+ } + I I 0 n6.0 0.0 ° ° o ° o ° o o' o o ° o ° _0.0.0.0_ _ I ' + u-o-O'O-O"O- "O"no+-�OO,-O°O '00oO�O�O�Oo000r,0 O O O O�,O O OoT ^ +t + •�+ ,C� + +Ovou°uOo_O-O_O_o_o�o_o"o"o�O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8n 0 S-/7-+-36.0 + + + i+ +; + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + dp + ++ + + + + + + + + + + + + + ++ + +� - L + +-_.-�,-__i- + + T �-�-- + + �r ++ o+++�___++-+---P� -� + + + + + + + + + + + 1 + + + T + T + . + + + + + + 1fi1 1+ + +�+ ++++++' 2'+++++++++++++++ + + o + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +1i 1 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + T + + + + - + + + + + + + + 1 + + + + + + + + + + + + + ,� 1+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 1++ii d + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +14 1+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ... + + . 1 T T T + + + + + + + +l+l+ ... +'ISI d 14 I + I i - - - - . , , T T T + + + + +I + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + I+ r'l+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +11 ++,+++++++++++++++ + + + a 1 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + BUILDING IF+ ++++++++++++++++++++++ T +++++++0+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 ++++++++++++++ ++'i BUILDING : ++++++++ 2 ++++++++ ++++++++++++++++++ ++++++�.+ SETBACK LINE SETBACK LINE + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +� + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ��_�_-+- + I+ µ + + d' + + + + + + + + +___+__�__ +- r-- F +- -� + + + + + + + + + + + �� + + + o ' 1+ +o+ + + + + + + + + + + + 4 ° ° ° °-o-°- °�0�0 6°0 °o°o°o°o° 1 15 EXISTING u o 0 0 0 0 00 00;0,0° °0000000000000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0-0.o_o_r 0 0+ ++ +; 15 EXISTING +I + + °000 °o °o °o°°°°°°°°°°o_o_o_� _ + +II 1 + + �'-°-° ^ " + + +�; INTERIOR SIDE INTERIOR SIDE ++ j LOT 7 LOT 8'+ + +*i o + + + I b 32,145 SF + 1 t 1 j 32,000 SF++ +�I I+ + '' 0.73 AC 0.74 AC t +1 + +; j ��#+ , + II }++ ++ BUILDING G --5.o BUILDING H++++++ + + +}' j 6 9 76 SF 5.0-- F 6,9 76 SF '�.+ + I + 1? --5.2 + \- I + + + 1 I (O ' .y+++ ++n + 1 + +11 r II I I ! CHAINLINK --� :++ ++++ ++ FENCE + I + + >, ,� + +I \ ++Al i 1 +++1.. 0.5 FT. WEST 1++ +++1 I o 109 �� .g', ++t ++: o OF LOT LINE. 1 ++ +t+�1o•0 109 n 9 3+5 8 '++-36.0+' a + 1 I a _ +1' -+_ 20.0-- I _ _ ' � • �� •--_ -, -�` � • '~=='r -'I i- -�� -�r-r�i�a`=# \�\ �- + + + + + 3i j � 20j o + I+-`r--"-'�- - -+ + ATF + + �+ + + + + + + \ x + + + + I 1+ + W. I II I �~ + \\ + + N +c„+ + I' + + + + + + + + + 3 + n� ++++++I 1 + , + + s< I II, Imo/ + + 3 0 0 + +1 + + + + + + \ 6 +�%'+� 1 i + -6.0 {--6.0 + +`4 I; 1O 6 0 + + j + + + + + + + , 5 + + + ; ° I + I + + '�, I + 5 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + �.�,,.,�'� + + + + + + 0 aim + + 1+ + + + + + + + +11 + + + + + + + + + + + + + O + + 0 + + L 4 + ^�° - \1 o LANDSCAPE °oo ---EDGING/MULCH C4-------------------------- - I ; - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ;� .-- CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER + \- STORM WATER a) 1 5.8 FT. EAST OF LOT LINE MANAGEMENT BASIN o 1 ' ��A I o ,--- SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER +\- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 I 1/4 OF SECTION 14, T. 121, R. 25 0.4 FT. WEST OF LOT CORNER---\ �I-TY-_,� - - - - - - - - - - - _ _ - - _ _ - - - I - 1 °14'00" E N 89 °14'00" E - ~� - - ------ - ' �------- ' �--�-----------------------------„-----------------.-------- --- I ----1899.53------ ------3123.56----- ------------------------ - - - - - - - - - - - - ----`-------- - �- Po" 70 o a: C1 ------ -- °o � \ 0 MOW i ;°o° 000do°o°� '- SHE `� 66 I _A �� meq. ��, a 3( 0n13 2 Pl t) LINE ❑ 15 15 13' cP = 13 - 13 S, 45 13 13 CURB 13 13 13LANDSCAPE 13 �° 13,STOP (N 89 ti, 1 1 W Plat 1 RISER EDGING/MULCH LANDSCAPE -= ' - CB GOLDEN EAGLE ROAD - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ EDGING/ROCK BUILDING - ELEV.=958.16- - -SOUTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL & SHRUBS SETBACK LINE PARK (DOC.# 275353) AS MONUMENTED; ALSO NORTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF KLEIN FARMS 15' REAR %� I ESTATES 2ND ADDITION (DOC.# 753470) A A H I� _T_ A I_T_ F__ A F_'� Fri I_T_ I N i I i I PROJECT LOCATION PART OF THE SWj AND NE4, SECTION 14 TOWNSHIP 121, RANGE 25, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA. EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 2, BLOCK 3, OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA. LEGEND: SITE PLAN NOTES: 1. ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO FACE OF CURB, EDGE OF SIDEWALK OR EXTERIOR OF BUILDING UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR LOCATION OF EXITS, RAMPS, CONCRETE APRONS AND STOOPS. 2. TACK SHALL BE USED ON BITUMINOUS EDGE PRIOR TO PATCHING. MATCH EXISTING GRADES. 3. ALL CONCRETE SIDEWALKS ADJACENT TO BUILDING SHALL BE SEPARATED WITH A 2" EXPANSION JOINT. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL CONDUIT REQUIREMENTS FOR SITE LIGHTING, COMMUNICATION, SPRINKLER, ETC WITH OWNER PRIOR TO PAVING. 5. ACCESSIBLE ROUTE SHALL BE PROVIDED FROM ACCESSIBLE STALLS TO BUILDING ENTRANCE (SEE ADAAG REQUIREMENTS). POLE MOUNT APPROVED SIGNS CENTERED ON STALLS. PAINT INTERNATIONAL SYMBOL OF ACCESSIBILITY ON STALL. 6. CONSTRUCT ACCESSIBLE PEDESTRIAN RAMP PER ADAAG AND MNDOT STANDARDS INCLUDING CONTRASTING DETECTABLE WARNING METAL TRUNCATED DOME PANELS. 7. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING WITH FIRE MARSHAL FOR POSTING OF FIRE LANES, CURB MARKING AND SIGNAGE IF NEEDED. 8. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR DEMOLITION AND REMOVAL OF ALL EXISTING SITE FEATURES THAT INTERFERE WITH NEW WORK AS SHOWN. 9. ALL NEW UTILITIES MUST BE UNDERGROUND. COORDINATE LOCATIONS WITH LOCAL UTILITY COMPANIES. 10.SIDEWALKS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH CROSS SLOPE OF 1.5% WITH ADJUSTMENT +/- 0.5%. SIDEWALKS WILL BE INSPECTED AFTER CONSTRUCTION. ANY SIDEWALK EXCEEDING 2.0% CROSS SLOPE WILL NEED TO BE REPLACED AT CONTRACTORS EXPENSE. GENERAL NOTES: 1. PRIOR TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THAT ALL REQUIRED PERMITS AND APPROVALS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED. NO CONSTRUCTION OR FABRICATION SHALL BEGIN UNTIL THE CONTRACTOR HAS THOROUGHLY REVIEWED ALL PLANS AND OTHER DOCUMENTS APPROVED BY THE PERMITTING AUTHORITIES. 2. WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND THE REQUIREMENTS AND STANDARDS OF THE LOCAL GOVERNING AUTHORITY. THE SOILS REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION SET FORTH THEREIN ARE A PART OF THE REQUIRED CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AND IN CASE OF CONFLICT SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE UNLESS SPECIFICALLY NOTED OTHERWISE ON THE PLANS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER OF ANY DISCREPANCY BETWEEN SOILS REPORT AND PLANS. 3. SITE CLEARING SHALL INCLUDE THE LOCATION AND REMOVAL OF ALL UNDERGROUND PIPING, VALVING, ETC. 4. SITE GRADING SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THESE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND THE RECOMMENDATIONS SET FORTH IN THE SOILS REPORT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVING AND REPLACING ALL SOFT, YIELDING OR UNSUITABLE MATERIALS AND REPLACING WITH SUITABLE MATERIALS AS SPECIFIED. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT A COMPACTION REPORT PREPARED BY A QUALIFIED SOILS ENGINEER, LICENSED WITHIN THE STATE WHERE THE WORK IS PERFORMED, VERIFYING THAT ALL FILLED AREAS AND SUBGRADE AREAS WITHIN THE BUILDING PAD AND PAVEMENT AREAS HAVE BEEN COMPACTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SET FORTH IN THE SOILS REPORT. 5. THE LOCATIONS OF THE UNDERGROUND FACILITIES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE BASED ON FIELD SURVEYS AND LOCAL UTILITY COMPANY RECORDS. IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTACT THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES TO LOCATE THEIR FACILITIES PRIOR TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION. NO ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION SHALL BE PAID TO THE CONTRACTOR FOR DAMAGE AND REPAIR TO THESE FACILITIES CAUSED BY HIS WORK FORCE. 6. ALL EXISTING DIMENSIONS AND GRADES SHOWN ON THE PLANS SHALL BE FIELD VERIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY CONSTRUCTION MANAGER IF ANY DISCREPANCIES EXIST PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION FOR NECESSARY PLAN OR GRADE CHANGES. NO EXTRA COMPENSATION SHALL BE PAID TO THE CONTRACTOR FOR WORK HAVING TO BE REDONE DUE TO DIMENSIONS OR GRADES SHOWN INCORRECTLY ON THESE PLANS IF SUCH NOTIFICATION HAS NOT BEEN GIVEN. 0 30 60 90 r � GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET SURVEY DATA SURVEY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY: MEYER ROHLIN LAND SERVICES 708 1st AVENUE NE BUFFALO, MN 55313 DATED: APRIL 18, 2017 BENCHMARK: MN/DOT GEODETIC MONUMENT "8605 S" ELEVATION = 966.55 NAVD88 DATUM SITE DATA: EXISTING ZONING: 1-2 HEAVY INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT PROPOSED ZONING: PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT EXISTING PID: 155-018-003020 EXISTING LOT AREA: LOT 1 1 : 191,832 SF = 4.40 ACRES PROPOSED BUILDING AREAS: �e 64109 BUILDING 6,976 SF x 8 = 55,808 SF EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA 2,822 SF = 0.06 ACRES PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA 150,032 SF = 3.44 ACRES >> 78.27. CL U W 0013NET IMPERVIOUS AREA INCREASE 147,210 SF = 3.38 ACRES J N O CO W PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA 41,800 SF = 0.96 ACRES >> 21.8% Q wo co Q Nam. 03 to DISTURBANCE AREA 200,441 SF = 4.60 ACRES x L Wi cncc cn Z Wz PARKING DATA: Co W z g REQUIRED PARKING STALLS:� ', 1 C O O CL CL OFFICE @ 1 /200sf; 10% x 55,808 sf / 200 = 28 SPACES > > � W WAREHOUSE @ 1 /2,000sf; 90% x 55,808 sf / 2,000 = 25 SPACES O 0 W Total = 53 SPACES Q z c ORION PROVIDED PARKING STALLS: "waft 1•+ Q. Q � I 9' x 20' SPACES = 90 SPACES (INCL 8 HC SPACES) T O Q waft 11i CL 1-2 MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS Lu INOOR LOCATION: BUILDING PARKING Lu Nam ^^ '' v, FRONT EXISTING 30 6 Q STREET SIDE EXISTING 30 6 INTERIOR SIDE EXISTING 15 6 INTERIOR SIDE PROPOSED 0 0 REAR YARD EXISTING 15 6 a 00 o � KEY NOTES:° °_ a4i 'y � r� V' N cNo N O BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT; SEE SECTION ON DETAIL SHEET ° I , o E LO W d v O CONCRETE PAVEMENT HEAVY DUTY, WIDTH VARIES. 6" CONCRETE co o Z � � I o W/6 X6 ##10/10 W.W.M. CONST. JTS @ 12 O.C.) OVER 4 CLASS 5 AGGREGATE ,� W o BASE. MnDOT 2461 MIX 3Y22A SLIPFORM PLACEMENT OR MnDOT 2461 MIX 3Y32A o C' A I , o o n'°' MANUAL PLACEMENT. yEio W m OCONCRETE PAVEMENT LIGHT DUTY, ° o o U 3 MIN. 5 FT WIDTH. 4" CONCRETE o C` � w° W 6"X6"-#10 10 W.W.M. CONST. JTS @ 6' O.C.). SEE SECTION ON SHEET C4.0. a C `� I o c: MnDOT 2461 MIX 3Y22A (CONST. PLACEMENT OR MnDOT 2461 MIX 3Y32A o oU I -, MANUAL PLACEMENT, INTEGRAL SIDEWALK WITH THICKENED EDGE CURB FACE IS AN ° � a, �, ACCEPTABLE OPTION. _ :3E ;, - \ n 0 ' OD412 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER �'` o v � MIX 3Y22A FOR MACHINE PLACEMENT (MnDOT 2461) c � O m MIX 3Y32A FOR MANUAL PLACEMENT (MnDOT 2461) v oa o o O D612 CONCRETE CURB WITH TIP -OUT GUTTER 4 o MIX 3Y22A FOR MACHINE PLACEMENT (MnDOT 2461) r e o �, o° � MIX 3Y32A FOR MANUAL PLACEMENT MnDOT 2461 3 NOT APPLICABLE WHEN INTEGRAL SIDEWALK WITH HICKENED EDGE CURB FACE IS TO BE CONSTRUCTED. PED. RAMP - IN ACCORDANCE WITH AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT & MnDOT O6 STANDARD PLAN 5-297.250 INCLUDING CONTRASTING DETECTABLE WARNING DEVICES. DEPRESS BACK OF CURB AT RAMP. O PAINT INTERNATIONAL SYMBOL OF ACCESSABILITY WITH WHITE LATEX PAINT. OACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN (MnDOT NOS, R7 -8A & R7-813). CENTER SIGN ON O PARKING STALL. LOCATION PER GENERAL CONTRACTOR. MOUNT ON STEEL CHANNEL POST. O PAINT 4" SOLID STRIPE - WHITE LATEX PAINT, 10 EXISTING PAVEMENT TO REMAIN. O11 EXISTING DRIVEWAY ACCESS AND CULVERT TO BE REMOVED. RESTORE GRADES TO MATCH EXISTING ROADSIDE DITCH. 12 EXISTING ADJACENT OWNERS FENCE TO REMAIN IN PLACE. 13 EXISTING ADJACENT PROPERTY TREES/SHRUBS TO REMAIN IN PLACE. 14 DIRECTIONAL TRAFFIC SIGN ON STEEL CHANNEL POST a STOP b DO NOT ENTER O c DO NOT EXIT d ONE WAY (WITH LEFT ARROW) 15 FENCE, CHAINLINK, 6.0 FT HEIGHT, INSTALL AT 1.0 FT FROM PROPERTY LINE V) 00 0 o m W 0 a v INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: o CO PROJECT LOCATION PLAN C1 SITE PLAN C2 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN C3 SANITARY AND WATER UTILITY PLAN C4 STORM SEWER UTILITY PLAN C5 LANDSCAPE PLAN C6 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C7 EXISTING CONDITIONS AND REMOVALS PLAN C8 DETAILS C9 PHASING PLAN FILE NO. 00633 C1 Site Plan EXISTING BOUNDARY BUILDING SETBACK LINE - - - -- PROPOSED LOT LINE PROPOSED FENCE ------------------------------ PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER TIP -OUT FLOWLINE ® PROPOSED PARKING STALLS •::;•::;•::;•:::•::;•::;•:::•:::•:::•:::•::;I PROPOSED BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT ° o o ° ° o o ° ° o ° ° ° ° 00000000000000000000000000000;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0j PROPOSED HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT°o°oo°°oo°°o°°° - r �� s ''a• PROPOSED LIGHT DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT SITE PLAN NOTES: 1. ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO FACE OF CURB, EDGE OF SIDEWALK OR EXTERIOR OF BUILDING UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR LOCATION OF EXITS, RAMPS, CONCRETE APRONS AND STOOPS. 2. TACK SHALL BE USED ON BITUMINOUS EDGE PRIOR TO PATCHING. MATCH EXISTING GRADES. 3. ALL CONCRETE SIDEWALKS ADJACENT TO BUILDING SHALL BE SEPARATED WITH A 2" EXPANSION JOINT. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL CONDUIT REQUIREMENTS FOR SITE LIGHTING, COMMUNICATION, SPRINKLER, ETC WITH OWNER PRIOR TO PAVING. 5. ACCESSIBLE ROUTE SHALL BE PROVIDED FROM ACCESSIBLE STALLS TO BUILDING ENTRANCE (SEE ADAAG REQUIREMENTS). POLE MOUNT APPROVED SIGNS CENTERED ON STALLS. PAINT INTERNATIONAL SYMBOL OF ACCESSIBILITY ON STALL. 6. CONSTRUCT ACCESSIBLE PEDESTRIAN RAMP PER ADAAG AND MNDOT STANDARDS INCLUDING CONTRASTING DETECTABLE WARNING METAL TRUNCATED DOME PANELS. 7. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING WITH FIRE MARSHAL FOR POSTING OF FIRE LANES, CURB MARKING AND SIGNAGE IF NEEDED. 8. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR DEMOLITION AND REMOVAL OF ALL EXISTING SITE FEATURES THAT INTERFERE WITH NEW WORK AS SHOWN. 9. ALL NEW UTILITIES MUST BE UNDERGROUND. COORDINATE LOCATIONS WITH LOCAL UTILITY COMPANIES. 10.SIDEWALKS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH CROSS SLOPE OF 1.5% WITH ADJUSTMENT +/- 0.5%. SIDEWALKS WILL BE INSPECTED AFTER CONSTRUCTION. ANY SIDEWALK EXCEEDING 2.0% CROSS SLOPE WILL NEED TO BE REPLACED AT CONTRACTORS EXPENSE. GENERAL NOTES: 1. PRIOR TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THAT ALL REQUIRED PERMITS AND APPROVALS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED. NO CONSTRUCTION OR FABRICATION SHALL BEGIN UNTIL THE CONTRACTOR HAS THOROUGHLY REVIEWED ALL PLANS AND OTHER DOCUMENTS APPROVED BY THE PERMITTING AUTHORITIES. 2. WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND THE REQUIREMENTS AND STANDARDS OF THE LOCAL GOVERNING AUTHORITY. THE SOILS REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION SET FORTH THEREIN ARE A PART OF THE REQUIRED CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AND IN CASE OF CONFLICT SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE UNLESS SPECIFICALLY NOTED OTHERWISE ON THE PLANS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER OF ANY DISCREPANCY BETWEEN SOILS REPORT AND PLANS. 3. SITE CLEARING SHALL INCLUDE THE LOCATION AND REMOVAL OF ALL UNDERGROUND PIPING, VALVING, ETC. 4. SITE GRADING SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THESE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND THE RECOMMENDATIONS SET FORTH IN THE SOILS REPORT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVING AND REPLACING ALL SOFT, YIELDING OR UNSUITABLE MATERIALS AND REPLACING WITH SUITABLE MATERIALS AS SPECIFIED. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT A COMPACTION REPORT PREPARED BY A QUALIFIED SOILS ENGINEER, LICENSED WITHIN THE STATE WHERE THE WORK IS PERFORMED, VERIFYING THAT ALL FILLED AREAS AND SUBGRADE AREAS WITHIN THE BUILDING PAD AND PAVEMENT AREAS HAVE BEEN COMPACTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SET FORTH IN THE SOILS REPORT. 5. THE LOCATIONS OF THE UNDERGROUND FACILITIES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE BASED ON FIELD SURVEYS AND LOCAL UTILITY COMPANY RECORDS. IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTACT THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES TO LOCATE THEIR FACILITIES PRIOR TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION. NO ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION SHALL BE PAID TO THE CONTRACTOR FOR DAMAGE AND REPAIR TO THESE FACILITIES CAUSED BY HIS WORK FORCE. 6. ALL EXISTING DIMENSIONS AND GRADES SHOWN ON THE PLANS SHALL BE FIELD VERIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY CONSTRUCTION MANAGER IF ANY DISCREPANCIES EXIST PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION FOR NECESSARY PLAN OR GRADE CHANGES. NO EXTRA COMPENSATION SHALL BE PAID TO THE CONTRACTOR FOR WORK HAVING TO BE REDONE DUE TO DIMENSIONS OR GRADES SHOWN INCORRECTLY ON THESE PLANS IF SUCH NOTIFICATION HAS NOT BEEN GIVEN. 0 30 60 90 r � GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET SURVEY DATA SURVEY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY: MEYER ROHLIN LAND SERVICES 708 1st AVENUE NE BUFFALO, MN 55313 DATED: APRIL 18, 2017 BENCHMARK: MN/DOT GEODETIC MONUMENT "8605 S" ELEVATION = 966.55 NAVD88 DATUM SITE DATA: EXISTING ZONING: 1-2 HEAVY INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT PROPOSED ZONING: PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT EXISTING PID: 155-018-003020 EXISTING LOT AREA: LOT 1 1 : 191,832 SF = 4.40 ACRES PROPOSED BUILDING AREAS: �e 64109 BUILDING 6,976 SF x 8 = 55,808 SF EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA 2,822 SF = 0.06 ACRES PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA 150,032 SF = 3.44 ACRES >> 78.27. CL U W 0013NET IMPERVIOUS AREA INCREASE 147,210 SF = 3.38 ACRES J N O CO W PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA 41,800 SF = 0.96 ACRES >> 21.8% Q wo co Q Nam. 03 to DISTURBANCE AREA 200,441 SF = 4.60 ACRES x L Wi cncc cn Z Wz PARKING DATA: Co W z g REQUIRED PARKING STALLS:� ', 1 C O O CL CL OFFICE @ 1 /200sf; 10% x 55,808 sf / 200 = 28 SPACES > > � W WAREHOUSE @ 1 /2,000sf; 90% x 55,808 sf / 2,000 = 25 SPACES O 0 W Total = 53 SPACES Q z c ORION PROVIDED PARKING STALLS: "waft 1•+ Q. Q � I 9' x 20' SPACES = 90 SPACES (INCL 8 HC SPACES) T O Q waft 11i CL 1-2 MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS Lu INOOR LOCATION: BUILDING PARKING Lu Nam ^^ '' v, FRONT EXISTING 30 6 Q STREET SIDE EXISTING 30 6 INTERIOR SIDE EXISTING 15 6 INTERIOR SIDE PROPOSED 0 0 REAR YARD EXISTING 15 6 a 00 o � KEY NOTES:° °_ a4i 'y � r� V' N cNo N O BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT; SEE SECTION ON DETAIL SHEET ° I , o E LO W d v O CONCRETE PAVEMENT HEAVY DUTY, WIDTH VARIES. 6" CONCRETE co o Z � � I o W/6 X6 ##10/10 W.W.M. CONST. JTS @ 12 O.C.) OVER 4 CLASS 5 AGGREGATE ,� W o BASE. MnDOT 2461 MIX 3Y22A SLIPFORM PLACEMENT OR MnDOT 2461 MIX 3Y32A o C' A I , o o n'°' MANUAL PLACEMENT. yEio W m OCONCRETE PAVEMENT LIGHT DUTY, ° o o U 3 MIN. 5 FT WIDTH. 4" CONCRETE o C` � w° W 6"X6"-#10 10 W.W.M. CONST. JTS @ 6' O.C.). SEE SECTION ON SHEET C4.0. a C `� I o c: MnDOT 2461 MIX 3Y22A (CONST. PLACEMENT OR MnDOT 2461 MIX 3Y32A o oU I -, MANUAL PLACEMENT, INTEGRAL SIDEWALK WITH THICKENED EDGE CURB FACE IS AN ° � a, �, ACCEPTABLE OPTION. _ :3E ;, - \ n 0 ' OD412 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER �'` o v � MIX 3Y22A FOR MACHINE PLACEMENT (MnDOT 2461) c � O m MIX 3Y32A FOR MANUAL PLACEMENT (MnDOT 2461) v oa o o O D612 CONCRETE CURB WITH TIP -OUT GUTTER 4 o MIX 3Y22A FOR MACHINE PLACEMENT (MnDOT 2461) r e o �, o° � MIX 3Y32A FOR MANUAL PLACEMENT MnDOT 2461 3 NOT APPLICABLE WHEN INTEGRAL SIDEWALK WITH HICKENED EDGE CURB FACE IS TO BE CONSTRUCTED. PED. RAMP - IN ACCORDANCE WITH AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT & MnDOT O6 STANDARD PLAN 5-297.250 INCLUDING CONTRASTING DETECTABLE WARNING DEVICES. DEPRESS BACK OF CURB AT RAMP. O PAINT INTERNATIONAL SYMBOL OF ACCESSABILITY WITH WHITE LATEX PAINT. OACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN (MnDOT NOS, R7 -8A & R7-813). CENTER SIGN ON O PARKING STALL. LOCATION PER GENERAL CONTRACTOR. MOUNT ON STEEL CHANNEL POST. O PAINT 4" SOLID STRIPE - WHITE LATEX PAINT, 10 EXISTING PAVEMENT TO REMAIN. O11 EXISTING DRIVEWAY ACCESS AND CULVERT TO BE REMOVED. RESTORE GRADES TO MATCH EXISTING ROADSIDE DITCH. 12 EXISTING ADJACENT OWNERS FENCE TO REMAIN IN PLACE. 13 EXISTING ADJACENT PROPERTY TREES/SHRUBS TO REMAIN IN PLACE. 14 DIRECTIONAL TRAFFIC SIGN ON STEEL CHANNEL POST a STOP b DO NOT ENTER O c DO NOT EXIT d ONE WAY (WITH LEFT ARROW) 15 FENCE, CHAINLINK, 6.0 FT HEIGHT, INSTALL AT 1.0 FT FROM PROPERTY LINE V) 00 0 o m W 0 a v INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: o CO PROJECT LOCATION PLAN C1 SITE PLAN C2 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN C3 SANITARY AND WATER UTILITY PLAN C4 STORM SEWER UTILITY PLAN C5 LANDSCAPE PLAN C6 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C7 EXISTING CONDITIONS AND REMOVALS PLAN C8 DETAILS C9 PHASING PLAN FILE NO. 00633 C1 Site Plan I I I I I I I I I i DUNDAS �� ROAD Y ---- 10" D.I.P. , I � O - 15" R.C.P. � _ vi 00 1 mllilllhlop � � �i ► �� FES-D-�,g6g' AFEShl HC )4 I j SAN Mh' FES -F 1 ; ' I Ch1' o _ 'c� `960 IE=958.80 960.0' 959.9 IN 3 i IE=958.60 ``� FES -E 63 �P 5o )(,, )1 i RIM ELE IE=960.00 c�'`' I 96 1 QAn 56„ ^ `� �� - --- �-��P-960-� QliQ 7Q INV. ELLv.=y�-u.i , °0 1�• i0m, �� IE=959.70 - CB -8 � 960 r '� _ r7 '� � �'_ _ FES -A I °- - � �o_ _ -� RE=961.10 0 0 00 E Plat) c - _ _ ° � 9�9»-� �_ _ IE=958.70 1 �.-959.7. 959.2X IE=957.00 _88 6 53 E X ) I - - _ (X 959.3 T RISER X � ►- l - T T - -�- -T �9� 960 T_ ` - �' 960.6 T --_ - - - - I6'`!�'___�I --- -3DD. D-� �3 �„ x` 1961960 o' - - - ' - 1_-- - --- >Q7 r � -yb `��- �-' 962 1`1 CB-9moi3�� ii�� - - --�'-�»._-»_-____'----" Q�__V1 � 9 - _ --_ rn--- �b1.5 0 SII CB -1 RE=961.20 ; g cP -- - '% 1 X`?-' oa,--' - -----=�b �' ° �' I 1- ei---- ery `b.4 �o �� 1 i1 \ RE=961.20 I E= 95 7.00 1 . , }- 9 I i IE=957.00 IN / 1 I- r N 962 °ti►� , o�� ge°ti _ _ -� > IE=959.00 OUT I IP 6 ? 9 I I�'9ah�`EASE}aPN lis 2 _- -- z.s% X963.0 x 962.9 ,_ I X 963. _ i o I 962.8X Q y i e 01 '1 \ 19 ' 9631 - 1- \ �,? I 1 0'621 I n.2 0' �� 'SSS^"-- ��- ; SII N 16 lL I lO \ --- - w I 1 --- I -'�' -------------------------- -- 1963 ------- ---- - - II �• Q, IT d°--------------------- 963 _ ------ CE ct \ i = Iii I - •'1 , � 109 109 II 'I • I ��i I 11-'- I lil Ig _; 9 2 _ _ ® 2.a% i I • _ _ I \ C) i 2.0% I i X962.2 _---------- - 962-A 1 I\ x963.5 w +i • �ti ► i ��' BUILDING B `� I ' BUILDING A g62 X61.9 11 \� X 9 P.,2 ;5 i 6 9 76 SF 6, 9 76 SF I I I I I \ 963.1 X\ o i i I I1, j CB -16- I \\ , / X 964.2 RE=962.50 FFE=963.50 \ FFE=963.50 IE=959.00 vI `\' X'9 0 \\ 11 1 X 961.9 - ` / °° \� \ 6�3 j� ee� III 1 962.0 i CD , � 0'"0'''0"0"0 � - I � N I � \ �� V V o-O-O'O"O"O_O_A c• , i V o 0 0 0 0 o�o' o' o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 o Ab I V u o -o -o- u '''� 0 0 0 0 0�0 1 M OAO O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 I I \ 1 __LI E I �j O a, 963.7 X - 6� - . - . =�. - . - . - - ° +^ �� g I CB -2 963.7 96 .5X r -.-I. .- 9 '' I o •ge? ti �, z.,% e' -o i, = RE=961.60 CB -1 1 d__ j� 's I ?.� � � ,.7% dee' ,.�% I al (I cn IE=957.00 \ \ RE=961.60 1 ?�� / IPS �, \ 1 \ \ IE= 95 7.00 I I I ° g6� _ _ ---- �--f------- 1 Q rn• t?\ °� X 9•V I-' =------- CB- 1 0------- ; ; u O -a -A- A.'A.'A"O�'A(yOV AVOo00n00^00^00000000"00-y v o-o�o-�-o"'o"o"o"o"o"o"o"0 0 0 0 oqo 0 0 0 o A o o I I X i "� o,o00000000000��° ° °o�° RE=961.90 °!F°° °��_°.a_°_A-A �° 3.0. i 1 ge i 960.9 1 I IX IX 96 MOW -__ ? \ IE=957.00 I 9 s�� LINE ' 3.0% ' ' 1 I 1 II 1-_ -MOW1 I I 1 CO I 1 I I X 961._ �IX961.0 X' 1. \ LINE I ',naon aP �i i� 1 I I i 1 I �v BUILDING D `� BUILDING C 6 976 SF �a62.0�611' X 960.6 1 I X x 963.9 964.5X I I 1 11bM, I; I CO 6, 9 76 SF ,; ey � X 9610. I 96, � CB-17I°,°I I n 1 I II `38 RE=962.50 FFE-963.50 1 1 WO F17NCE FFE=963.50 IE=959.00 - Q / 1 -- , X 1 1 964I� 1 °j i COf9F + \- 109 II - °' -9 ' ON I -IJ �1l LINE \I I ^9 2. �0� i vc�a, 109 ? X9Fl.5 / a � I III o I II Ii I 6 I --- --' ------------- -� ti:.yr:963.__ G - 4_--------- ----- 1 ;I I 1 ' � I 1X°� ----------- -------------------------. me? 96, i,ecA 6 o X95.61 \ I X 963.8 e?fir---- ---- 1\ ; I ° 2.s 1 I c\.o I I I I_ 157 o 11 • ! `'ge d'' 9 62 --- ----- ---- - -1- - - - \ °®rl+- - `96`? _ i I i CE -3 I n' M _p 2.7% °dry 962 2.7% ?O �b ' - � X RE= 9 61.10 � 96� CB- 13�- �ii�.�7�62.31 °�' i 2.7%_ Qdf ?;:% - I o \ IE=957.00 -I X 963.8 RE=961.10 - i# I IE=957.00 ° i I g I g62 �' �`� --- 61.4 ge °°`'` I i �r'I, \ o I III �?°°`� --------- -------- 962 -9 � ° - ° I ��b i oo -----� --,CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER + \- r�ti' - - - CB -12 l �2.5% a, I 5.1 FT. EAST OF LOT LINE I i I 2.5% I' I' \ RE- 9 61.10 1 \ 231- 1- 5 9. 0 \ \ \ I '1� \ IE=957.00 \\ 1 00 i I i 0 I z3 \ \ 963.4X / X 962.7\ I I °M1' --- ��---------� ..----�-- i • II ---��-------F- k----�--- 4----------------------••- - ------------------------- - 1.963 -- --- I' 963 ---- I \ fl o OI \ \ \ / I III I a 109 X 961.3 - Q = d- �' �\\ \ \\ \X 962.4 / ii II 109 I „ I - 1 0\ CHAINLINK---�^ S 2 Ili X 961.8 961.2 x /� j 1i I �1� FENCE +\- 1 if y J / ,� 111 ti+ li /' \ ! 2.0% I Cfl 10 \ rn X 960.5 ON LOT LINE. .,o ,y / 1 0 o o \ il 1.VAb 2.°% �I I BUILDING E 9 BUILDING F I ,l \b \ ~ 76 SF CO i I 1 \ X 958.6 ;IISI //II 6,9 76 SF - 6' 9 1 I X11 a I Ilo. / CB 18 J I I C; I 1 �- co i RE=962.50 FFE=963.50 I o xCri 960.41 i 1 FFE=963.50 IE=959.00 ; ' � 1 1 I ' I I I �' a.o% I -- 5.1 I �I' 61.1 X 961.5 X 9 9; 1 \- �i - I asp I V V u -a -a -o -a -O -O �O. 0O 0 ; J ; O Lo X 962.6 (J 3.0% I ° 0'� 0" 0' 0 0 00o0Soo0opo0o0o0 0'"' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0.0.0_ I ' i I� V o -o-o-0"0"0"0"0"'o'"'0 0 0 0 o a o 0 0 � /� \ V u u-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o''o'o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 J • o"'o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o b i I i - `9� • ; 1 \ I x u I ° 1 1 X 958.7 96�.--•-•� •-• -�\ ° I °�' g 1 I CB -4 I ge a �90i 1y° - e^' ,.7% °dry 2.,% / e'•�o' a 1 RE=961.60 \I \ IE=957.00 RE=961.60 -i = - I -� rn I ,'o gel I a t• o }� a i I 1 6) IE=957.00 •� I '6 }o � 1� I i ° la 4 ISI CB -14 T, g° _ �i 1 0 { �/' RE=961.90 \ 961.4 X I X 961.3,1, JF it 96.4 I CV � ?�I I IE=957.00j 0 \ 1 v F+ S 010-O'O•'O"O"O„Ov OVOo0o0°00 O000000000 o0o0AOr OnO�On0.,0..0,.0^q �` V' I o -o-0-0"0"0"0•'0•'0"0 O O tD 0 0 0 0 0 0 I / 1 Vo-O-O-O'"O•" "O"O•'O•'OVO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O ee? X00 \ i 'I i X959.9 2.8% s0I I it 0111 1X_961.0 ,I 1 X 961.3 , I'IN ' iln II \ �(�= i a 1 I I -P- I, X 962.7 '98% �1, BUILDING G �'\I BUILDING H ;' _ $;rye I, II II o li °etiI 6 976 SF --- - 1 6,976 SF x 961 _ ,�.- --5.� +\- II II I IIII CO CB -19 1i iii 0 30 60 90 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET SURVEY DATA SURVEY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY: MEYER ROHLIN LAND SERVICES S �O� �� BUFFALO, AVENUE 553f 13 DATED: APRIL 18, 2017 BENCHMARK: GO MN/DOT GEODETIC MONUMENT "8605 S" ELEVATION = 966.55 NAVD88 DATUM PROJECT LOCATION PART OF THE SW4' AND NE'r, SECTION 14 TOWNSHIP 121, RANGE 25, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA. EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 2, BLOCK 3, OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA. GENERAL GRADING NOTES: 1. Specifications applicable for this project: Current standard specifications for Monticello, MN, and the latest Minnesota Department of Transportation Specifications for Highway Construction and all NPDES requirements except where modified by these contract documents. 2. OSHA requirements shall be followed for all work on this project. 3. The Contractor shall notify "Gopher State One Call" 48 hours prior to any excavation (1-800-252-1166.) 4. The Grading Contractor shall verify all locations and elevations of underground utilities with utility companies prior to any construction, and immediately notify the Engineer of any conflicts. 5. Erosion Control shall be constructed, as applicable, as sequenced below: A. Silt Fence. B. Rock Construction Entrance. C. Demolition D. Common excavation (grading). E. Seed and mulch or sod (See notes on Landscape plan). 6. Final Plat shall govern for easements and lot dimensions. 7. Any erosion control items necessary to protect adjacent properties shall be constructed by the Grading Contractor. 8. Erosion control maintenance shall be performed by the Grading Contractor, and removed as per the Contract Documents or as directed by the Engineer, followed by all necessary restoration of disturbed area. This work shall be incidental to the grading contract. 9. The Grading Contractor shall schedule the soils engineer to facilitate certification of all controlled fills in a timely fashion. Density tests shall meet the following: A. Within the upper 3' of streets, the Grading Contractor shall utilize approved soils that are within 1% of the optimum moisture content as defined by the Standard Proctor Test -ASTM: D-698 with compaction meeting 100% Standard Proctor Density and not exceeding this compaction by more than 1 %. Below the upper 3', compaction shall meet 95% Standard Proctor Density, and be within 3% of the optimum moisture content. Grading tolerances shall be 0.1'. B. Grading tolerances for the remainder of the site shall be 0.25'. 10. All areas of unsuitable soils found in the pad described above that cannot be corrected shall be located in the field by the Grading Contractor. The Grading Contractor shall immediately notify the Engineer of these areas and provide information as to their size and location. 11. The Grading contractor shall provide positive drainage on the site at all times. 12. The Grading Contractor shall keep public streets and travel ways clear of soil and debris. Daily cleaning at the construction entrance shall be performed, especially at the end of each day's work. 13. All silt fence shall be removed at project completion. 14. All proposed elevations are at flow line unless otherwise noted. 15. All erosion control best manage practices shall be per City standards. CHAINLINK---- X62.3III RE=962.50 aFFE=.FENCE + FFE=963.50 IE=959.00 X 960.7 \ 0.5 FT. WEST I " o I " 109 OF LOT LINE. I11 109 flilb�!V� 1 I II n ' I I 963 ' ae? II, 963 --- ------------ - ,�---------- ---------- j Q2.07 I _ _ co Solt, -- --- ------J- -- - e' N 2 0% �J\ T fi 1 I� \ � 1 ;' \ - CB -6 I \\ �\ b�� ii ; % g61�; ,�1.1 X 960.6 9si.so aP\°6,� RE_961.40 I I °�' °� 951.7 CIP o / e ♦ IE -957.00 o I ° g , 5 ?moo X ax62.4 i I 2 j I, \� I oe�� a e ' �� 2 � � �-- 6 - ,per' � _ ' 0�O N 96 ---------- --- ------ ° :--- --- FP yy I CB -5 962.6X °�°� os,---- _----------------------------------: _ 2 -------------- �- � RE 961.40 p I 962.9x -------------- --- -.� ---�- ---.��;. x.962 \I = 962 -` �� 961 IE=957.00 CB -7961 „h.., �• 960 LANDSCAPE RE=961.40' / 960 l 959 IE=957.00 �� 959' 958 1(J 958 057 \ ` cD ---EDGING/MULCH 957 01� j �\ .-,g6\ � / / ; -- CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER + \- 962.2X - - _ _ X 961.8 0)\ - 5.8 FT. EAST OF LOT LINE �l x FES -B --- 962-� i O O 967.2 X -`\\ IE=957.00 �' L / QI p 9 \ (n 111\ cfl � � -� 1 �i , X96_ ,---SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST 00 �'' < u c�� 7 r 057 1 I i 114 OF SECTION 14, T. 121, R. 25 O CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER + \- `If 957 _ 958 \ m Q) 0.4 FT. WEST OF LOT CORNER --- II; -T'� 959 958 960 959 y�,� _, 1 » v -Pd-. N 89°14 00 E o m o .- 960 _ .� ,tin. I �t 961------------�- --X--- / i _ Z W N 89°14'00„ E , l' \ � 962 -------------------'--------- ---- ------1899.53------ 2 Y ------3123.56----- 964.2 x�---' - 963-a-„�y-r-��0 62.5- --fir _--- - - i - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ ----------------- - - --- _ 1.3 0 o v 963.7* o o�a96�-- Q ------- - ° ° ° �Q__ �,�___--=-_-299.81------961- °° _MOW-!=°°a�q� -_��R - _ �-(300.02_ \ �`� ---SHED-962---'-' ' °°° a'--`�`�" 66 INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: - - LINE �, -960-\\�� TC 958.96 - - Plat) _ _ _ _ _ i X 961.6 g61 Se �� ; _ -960- X 960.2 CO PROJECT LOCATION PLAN FILE N0. 00633 O,�` �� L STORM WATER ��` � �'�CURB 960.5 X I h gs h ' --TEL. LANDSCAPE °� 9�\X� (N INFILTRATION BASIN at STOP i RISER EDGING/MULCH C1 SITE PLAN X NWL = 957.00 - - - - - C2 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN �`� EDGINGSCAPEIROCK , GOLDEN EAGLE ROAD - \ ��-�B � `, _ _ _ _ _ _C3 SANITARY AND WATER UTILITY PLAN 2 YR = 957.82 SOUTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL 10 YR - 958.79 LEV. = 958.16 - - --_ 8c SHRUBS 100 YR = 58.79 1 � PARK (DOC.# 275353) AS MONUMENTED; ALSO C4 STORM SEWER UTILITY PLAN X I NORTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF KLEIN FARMS I I I C5 LANDSCAPE PLAN SEE BASIN DETAIL -)9- 958.7 ON DETAIL SHEET �' I ESTATES 2ND ADDITION (DOC.# 753470) C6 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN -- - - - - - - - _ I - I I I I I I C7 EXISTING CONDITIONS AND REMOVALS PLAN C8 D ETAI LS h C9 PHASING PLAN Grading and A I� A k rr_ r- _T_ A I_T_ F__ ahs ��'� N I I I A III Fri I S I n N i l I I I Drainage Plan LOU CU W 0. 3 O N (0 w z CC 10 Q) a O to Q .� NION ( LOU i -ii.. a:f- w z Co 111Zi_ No W C 0C) -C -Li 0 _Q W O oQ -� a p I z �1•+ ! r Q Q Q W MOM �Cr 0M LCIO� CO v, '^ a o CZqL° Co L42 r7 N (� co N W E LO I o U L O ;moo Z L I O� U x I Q) Qom` o ~ I mm dcnp.� -15 4 j c ~ 100CZ I W°� ai 3 c 3 p 000 U_ �. O00 J IZ l n O i ) `n o an U O O O D N a 3 ° Q a °c" o Z ° J CHAINLINK---- X62.3III RE=962.50 aFFE=.FENCE + FFE=963.50 IE=959.00 X 960.7 \ 0.5 FT. WEST I " o I " 109 OF LOT LINE. I11 109 flilb�!V� 1 I II n ' I I 963 ' ae? II, 963 --- ------------ - ,�---------- ---------- j Q2.07 I _ _ co Solt, -- --- ------J- -- - e' N 2 0% �J\ T fi 1 I� \ � 1 ;' \ - CB -6 I \\ �\ b�� ii ; % g61�; ,�1.1 X 960.6 9si.so aP\°6,� RE_961.40 I I °�' °� 951.7 CIP o / e ♦ IE -957.00 o I ° g , 5 ?moo X ax62.4 i I 2 j I, \� I oe�� a e ' �� 2 � � �-- 6 - ,per' � _ ' 0�O N 96 ---------- --- ------ ° :--- --- FP yy I CB -5 962.6X °�°� os,---- _----------------------------------: _ 2 -------------- �- � RE 961.40 p I 962.9x -------------- --- -.� ---�- ---.��;. x.962 \I = 962 -` �� 961 IE=957.00 CB -7961 „h.., �• 960 LANDSCAPE RE=961.40' / 960 l 959 IE=957.00 �� 959' 958 1(J 958 057 \ ` cD ---EDGING/MULCH 957 01� j �\ .-,g6\ � / / ; -- CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER + \- 962.2X - - _ _ X 961.8 0)\ - 5.8 FT. EAST OF LOT LINE �l x FES -B --- 962-� i O O 967.2 X -`\\ IE=957.00 �' L / QI p 9 \ (n 111\ cfl � � -� 1 �i , X96_ ,---SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST 00 �'' < u c�� 7 r 057 1 I i 114 OF SECTION 14, T. 121, R. 25 O CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER + \- `If 957 _ 958 \ m Q) 0.4 FT. WEST OF LOT CORNER --- II; -T'� 959 958 960 959 y�,� _, 1 » v -Pd-. N 89°14 00 E o m o .- 960 _ .� ,tin. I �t 961------------�- --X--- / i _ Z W N 89°14'00„ E , l' \ � 962 -------------------'--------- ---- ------1899.53------ 2 Y ------3123.56----- 964.2 x�---' - 963-a-„�y-r-��0 62.5- --fir _--- - - i - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ ----------------- - - --- _ 1.3 0 o v 963.7* o o�a96�-- Q ------- - ° ° ° �Q__ �,�___--=-_-299.81------961- °° _MOW-!=°°a�q� -_��R - _ �-(300.02_ \ �`� ---SHED-962---'-' ' °°° a'--`�`�" 66 INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: - - LINE �, -960-\\�� TC 958.96 - - Plat) _ _ _ _ _ i X 961.6 g61 Se �� ; _ -960- X 960.2 CO PROJECT LOCATION PLAN FILE N0. 00633 O,�` �� L STORM WATER ��` � �'�CURB 960.5 X I h gs h ' --TEL. LANDSCAPE °� 9�\X� (N INFILTRATION BASIN at STOP i RISER EDGING/MULCH C1 SITE PLAN X NWL = 957.00 - - - - - C2 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN �`� EDGINGSCAPEIROCK , GOLDEN EAGLE ROAD - \ ��-�B � `, _ _ _ _ _ _C3 SANITARY AND WATER UTILITY PLAN 2 YR = 957.82 SOUTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL 10 YR - 958.79 LEV. = 958.16 - - --_ 8c SHRUBS 100 YR = 58.79 1 � PARK (DOC.# 275353) AS MONUMENTED; ALSO C4 STORM SEWER UTILITY PLAN X I NORTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF KLEIN FARMS I I I C5 LANDSCAPE PLAN SEE BASIN DETAIL -)9- 958.7 ON DETAIL SHEET �' I ESTATES 2ND ADDITION (DOC.# 753470) C6 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN -- - - - - - - - _ I - I I I I I I C7 EXISTING CONDITIONS AND REMOVALS PLAN C8 D ETAI LS h C9 PHASING PLAN Grading and A I� A k rr_ r- _T_ A I_T_ F__ ahs ��'� N I I I A III Fri I S I n N i l I I I Drainage Plan MH -1 48" DIA. CONCRETE WITH OUTSIDE DROP - NEENAH CASTING R-1642 - - - RE=961.50 IE(W)=943.54 (8" IN EX) h IE(E)=943.54 (8" OUT EX) IE(S)=949.33 (8" IN)- IE(DROP)=944.00 (8") DROP=7.82 FT 00 SAN MH h1 RIM ELEV.=961.96 ��• INV. ELEV.=943.7 , � CONNECT TO CITY 10" DIP WATER MAIN 10"x8" WET -TAP WITH 8" GATE VALVE AND RISER DUNDAS �� ROAD I N � \ 00 15 R.C.P. m - s ♦ 1AN MH 9 o h END OFQ EXISTING WATER SERVICE CULVERT ; /g6 RIM ELEV.=960.04 `� (� 960.0° - �� 959.90 INV. EL V,.=942.8 61.11 ,� 6 GATE VALVE - p 1 BURIED off- _� 960.66) _ l );-°6-960so* X60 959.79 's - - - - - 960 %16- '` REMOVE EXISTING 6" x,60 X 958.6 I EXISTING SANITARY ��59 3, REMOVE EXISTING STREET PAVEMENT AS o -��-To4�959.7. = PLUG CONNECT WITH = 960 9 _ -'o.- 8 - - - - �, T -- T �- SEWER SERVICE ,o -T_ o^' �- �0_. RISER NECESSARY FOR UTILITY INSTALLATION; SAWCUT - -9 ° 3� �'-!^'o - �'so _ _ _ _ _ 8"x6" REDUCER AND TO REMAIN WITH �� -=96 i _ FOR CLEAN EDGE; REPLACE PAVEMENT TO MATCH _ Y,� r 8" DIP CL52 PIPE - -_- -_ - - - -_ NO CHANGES �=_ ------------ -_ _�`� "- " > - - EXISTING MATERIALS, SECTION, AND ELEVATIONS. � _ =-_-------= == -�- ' --------- - - -- ---051.5--- ° - X 961.5 mss' ° "----- - - s------- 6, ---- 6 0 ALL WORK TO BE COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE p; ;I . s0 ��o 8 DIPWITH CITY STANDARDS. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE A 1'.� I I 45° BEND L� ` �\"r ,,�J� TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN FOR REVIEW AND ` -CULVERT -g62� Bryk r„�6 / 96� ; °,6�= - 9 . �? _ �� 6� EAS °�`O t 8 „ DIP As . o I > APPROVAL BY THE CITY, AND OBTAIN EXCAVATION I I fl _ R _ PERMIT FROM CITY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT �' ;.� 9oti x g.g 458 BEND X X63.' �, 45° BE Y I6�� I > X 863.0 r I\\\ " ss-- TPRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. , - ?,; �I 1 I I 1- - 6 °, - - - - -9s I �0 62 , X (OI c, �g 4 40 0» 20 LF 6 PVC ? , W �I Ir, I ticP I X00 \ 20 LF - 6 PVC �6�' _ _ __-. _ _SCH 40 @ 2.0%�° 8 DIP m I �� II --- ------------- -- SCH 40 @ 2.0% -----.------- - -- - - SLOPE OR GREATER �., 45*BEND I I SLOPE OR GREATER ! I DOMESTIC SANITARY t Q I II DOMESTIC SANITARY IE=954.10 I IE=954.10 _ 4 I 184 LF 8" �' I 96'.2 PVC SDR 26 '9� ih - 6"x6" DIP TEE _ _ - - - - - - - 6;'x6" DIP TEE \ I }, - - 6 GATE VALVE AND RISER 1 X 963.5 @ 0.40% II o2h? 6" GATE VALVE AND RISER _ l \ \ h 19 B'JILDINC /43 LF - 6" DIP CL52 BUILDING B DOMESTIC " DIP ER CL52 FIRE I X61.9 1 \ 92••5 co DOMESTIC WATER AND FIRE 6, 976 SI- I 963.1 X \ O I I 6,976 _SF SUPPRESSION SUPPLY I� \ \I I X 964.2 \ SUPPRESSION SUPPLY TOP OF PIPE = 956.00 \ F TOP OF PIPE = 956.00 FFE-963.0 II ' I 1 \ FFE =963.0 - Iloh° I \ \ X 96 \ I ss I\ X 961.9 - \962'0 '� X 6"..3 I \ z? . f rn \ I ' \ „ O -O -O -O -O -O O"o"0'0,0.)060608°O°O°O°Oogo,J0 ovo 4J ° ° >o„o„o_o_1_o i' ��°�o�o; -o_o_o ° ° 0000000,00000000000°°°° 197 LF - 8 - -9�U MH -3 I M OE 9s� o --- - --- - @ 0.72% 26 ----- -- I ^° ---- - - -- R0 °oo o ° - m 48 DIA. CONCRETE -'Ro -- --\-- - X o o� X m NEENAH CASTING R-1642 963.7 / 6� - . - L �; -- g6� ' 96�.5x I�s .-.-.-. .-.-.1ro g .-.-. o I _ ryo 1967.. I m RE=963.05 i . 62, ti o s / �, roti �o�'° = IE(NE)=952.05 (8" OUT) MH-2�o 48" DIA. CONCRETE "� 96,., / 1-0 \ 1 \ \ NEENAH CASTING R-1642 I I ° / 96� _ \ N \\ RE=962.10 I - �� I \ �0 8„x8„ IE(E)=950.62 (8 IN) cp I I _ " - - - .----------- X $rsfiao� 1 I �, 8"x8" -- :I --_- 258 LF 8 DIP CL52 - ° ,�, �o DIP TEE IE(S) 950.12 (8 IN) X > gq.�� °o°000000 °o °°°° ° ° ° �° WATER SERVICE INSTALL AT god' I I I \ IE(N)=950.07 (8 OUT) I DIP TEE o„�, i 960.9 _ I 96 DI \ MINIMUM 7.5 FT BURY DEPTH II i i I iX 96� 96Q J ' I I I LINE f I \ \ ' I i I I' - 6"x6" DIP TEE I,-"-M0W I I I I 6x6 DIP TEE /x96 \ ' I 961.7 / 6" GATE VALVE AND RISER LINE I II II \\ X0'„1 f / <'>� 6" GATE VALVE AND RISER i N n�,) n 17 LF - 6" DIP CL52 17 LF - 6 DIP CL52 .1 BUILDING C BUILDING D DOMESTIC WATER AND FIRE it I I DOMESTIC WATER AND FIRE X 960.6 I I 964.5 X I I Ilo�, I C° 6, a 76 SF SUPPRESSION SUPPLY 6, g 76 SF SUPPRESSION SUPPLY I I X 960 �,, X 96X 963.9 I tA I 6250 i TOP OF PIPE = 956.00 I TOP OF PIPE = 956.00 I II �8 ' I WO(�j F_NCE FFE=963.50 FFE=963.50 964.4 I °j 'I COf I'zP + \- / II rn� e m rn CO I --140 LF - 6" PVC 40 LF - 6 PVC ! II ;:, Q o I I \ g,i2YQQ \I,_c�1 LINE a SCH 40 @ 2.0% I � I u cF+ � o 0, SCH 40 @ 2.0% 1 X 9F 1 .5 / ti o I I I I 490 LF - 8" DIP I I `, a SLOPE OR GREATER I ___ _____. =: 963 DOMESTIC SANITARY GREATER i 96 " o I w I 6 1 SLOPE ` CL52 WATER SERVICE I I \ r9s __ ____..____-_:963.__.. DOMESTIC SANITARY ; - 9��e ' 1 ` IE -954.10 ;I 1�6��'' 96� '� O I X95.61\ I\ IIXO X 963.8 INSTALL WATER I s �' \ ?e C _ ; 0 _ I c0 I I 6 J i o IE -954.10 0. o rn I SERVICE AT MINIMUM \ \ I I I 7.5 FT BURY DEPTH/ ^ I I - I �° = �' ;{ 962 l ` ----------�- - 96L'--- G2 9 iI I` O �g 0 6, � X \ 5 5 962- 20 X\ n r n n I 7Q g u 007 0 962.3„ I I I I� 790 LF - 8" DIP CL52 WATER ' I 62 0o 16 II I 9 /9 ho h° -oti- - oti1.4 os mol; �o� o IllRBURY INSTALL DEPTH AT MINIMUM 7.5 CORNER + �- e o ---- 0°� ----- Doti- �`- - e I--- iiFT s __ �� I I ill 0ri96��---- �'�-/4I I I �9oti° rn ! 5.1 1- I. L.ASI UI- LOT LINE ?\ \ \\ \\ I II f ,;� I o 20 LF - 6" PVC s I ; 0 59.0 \ \ 963.4X /X 962.7, I off' o - _ a II 62 �� 20 LF 6 PVC ---- -- Son ---- ------ - o \ / e I'o _____L�-------------• SCH 40 @ 2.0% .� � ,�• II 19 -------- ---------- -- - SCH 40 @ 2.0% - - II rn ; I „ �1 �I I ( SLOPE OR GREATER ;; ,� HYDRANT No. 2 272 LF - 8 I SLOPE OR GREATER 0 PVC SDR 26 ! I DOMESTIC SANITARY » • II I DOMESTIC SANITARY IE=954.10 II 6 GATE VALVE AND RISER @ 0.40% I I rn • II I IE=954L 11.10 _ I; Q;= I 12 LF 6" DIP CHAINLINK ---�^ 92 II X 961.8 961.2 X / 1 II ; 6x8 DIP TEE FENCE 6"x6" DIP TEE _ I GROUND ELV.=963.00 ON LOT LINE. �o �I //, - 6"x6" DIP TEE \ 6" GATE VALVE AND RISER = 0 1\ \\ oX 960.5 0 i ;;I, 6" GATE VALVE AND RISER BL ILDING F 43 LF - 6" DIP CL52 = I B JILDING E43 LF - 6" DIP CL52 / II coo g 7Fj SF DOMESTIC WATER AND FIRE 6; 9 76 S� DOMESTIC WATER AND FIRE = 0 1 \\ X 958.6 , SUPPRESSION SUPPLY II / II SUPPRESSION SUPPLY TOP OF PIPE = 956.00 I \I CO II TOP OF PIPE = 956.00 ! ;; 1 X 60.4 coo FFE =963.T FFE=963.50 II y° o 11 ! ll I ss \,4. � X961.5 -�" X9 .9� v v o 0 0 0 0' o' ► 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0_ / , I ! 2.564'o" o . I 0 `; a�° „ 000�°o X 962.6 �� ° ° ° ° ° ° ° 8" DIP 1 k' °00000000000°oq;oo°°° ° °> ° ° ° °_°_°_° ° 197 LF - 8 ?s s� - - - - PVC SDR 26---�----- XU' / / �� 9 /, 1451° BEND I 11 X 958.7 MH -4 I I - �a -- - ---- - -- -- - @ 0.40% \ , . 48 DIA. CONCRETE \ i1- 6� o • - • -�\ o� / g6� s NEENAH CASTING R-1642 - 7' ' T - - g o 6, \ \ O �' \ RE= 9 61.85 { 96' 90 . \ / C) -0. �,9� eo J °o \ 1 0 \ 1 I IE(E)=951.26 (8 IN) -+ I ✓�� do I I IE(N)=951.21 (8" OUT) I96'�° g66 �� g6�- I. ;�. _;'-� IMH-5 = I \ 961.4 X X 961.5 8" DIP 196 48" DIA. CONCRETE 8"x8" DIP TEE I - \___________. ---------------- 45° BEND I 0 NEENAH CASTING R-1642 �o o"'' ---- _ >< u o o -o ° ° ° ° ° °�°�c00000°�0-0- RE=963.05 AND 8"x6" DIP -• °-o-°-°-°-o- o� ° °o°Doo°Doo°o°o o ° o 0 0 0 oti I REDUCER (SOUTH) s �� °o^°^°^°v°°°°°°°°° °°°°°°" °" ° ° ° ° ° ° ° �° �f = IE(NE)=952.05 (8" OUT) 6"x6" DIP TEE 1 X_961.0 I 6;'x6" DIP TEE 961.3 6" GATE VALVE AND RISER 0 Ili h ; 6 GATE VALVE AND RISER 17 LF - 6" DIP CL52 II X gory^ I BUILDING G 17 LF - 6" DIP CL52 BUILDING H DOMESTIC WATER AND FIRE 0, 962.7 }; w B DOMESTIC WATER AND FIRE SUPPRESSION SUPPLY _ e62' 6, 9 76 SF SUPPRESSION SUPPLY 6, . 76 SF TOP OF PIPE = 956.00 - 5. P + �- TOP OF PIPE = 9.56.00 133 LF - 6" DIP CL52 WATER i 1' FFE-J63.50 \ FFE=963.50 ;' 11 y I' x 960.7 SERVICE INSTALL WATER SERVICE , I� \ ,= AT MINIMUM 7.5 FT BURY DEPTH I �, \ 10" I OF LOT LINE. 40 LF - 6" PVC 40 LF - 6 PVC "r r I I 9 SCH 40 @ 2.0% j j \\ _�Y - SLOPEORGREATER 96a.3p1 I s _ __ _J_-_ - SLOPE OR GREATER =- = �� -_- ----' -C- - DOMESTIC SANITARY f 1 ° 0 I f\ DOMESTIC SANITARY r°v' 1 „ o \ IE=954.10 6 DIP IE -954.10 \ o° o°' 6, ao', _ 9 1.1 22.5° BEND o o" I I I ! ! ti \,,o� I I I I ,! 9 X 960.6 961.80 `\ 9 960 96L I I \ +90 \,w 951.7 90�?° �p ! „' / " T ````_ 9S 6?� i i 1 OOI t 9 / o 19 5 20 I s s ' I X 962.4 I 962 ----- - 0o�oh L-- - - - --- - 962 962.6x q 962.9X o��.-�--------------------------.�------- -� 962 - 0 HYDRANT No. 1� 961 -mow 962 �F2 F i.961.960 .959 0 960 jc��2 � 958 LANDSCAPE 6" GATE VALVE AND RISERI\ // .95g X y 957 ,--EDGING/MULCH GROUND ELV.=962.65 / �/ 958 957 4 1 1 °' 0 ' 919, \ ,g6\' I.-CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER + \- ,�j I�(1 Irl �0 00 ,--�_� I �/ 962.2X____96 -X961.8 �\ ' `I 5.8 FT. EAST OF LOT LINE 967.2 � `�,\\ � / '��\ I �� 2�\- L� / 09 -A\cfl - 1 0>96_ ---SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST 1\i ` X 099 3 957 1 121 R 25 GENERAL UTILITY NOTES n. 0 30 60 90 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET SURVEY DATA SURVEY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY: MEYER ROHLIN LAND SERVICES 708 1st AVENUE NE BUFFALO, MN 55313 DATED: APRIL 18, 2017 BENCHMARK: MN/DOT GEODETIC MONUMENT "8605 S" ELEVATION = 966.55 NAVD88 DATUM PROJECT LOCATION PART OF THE SW4' AND NE'r, SECTION 14 TOWNSHIP 121, RANGE 25, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA. EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 2, BLOCK 3, OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA. 1. Specifications applicable for this project: Current standard specifications for the City of Monticello, MN and all Minnesota Department of Health and MPCA requirements except where modified by these contract documents. 2. OSHA requirements shall be followed for all work on this project. 3. The Contractor shall notify "Gopher State One Call" prior to any excavation (651 -454-0002 or 1 -800-252-1166 out state.) 4. The Contractor shall verify all locations and elevations of underground utilities with utility companies prior to any construction (storm sewer, sanitary sewer, water, natural gas, telephone, electric, etc.), and immediately notify the Engineer of any conflicts. 5. The Contractor shall protect all existing utilities and facilities to allow proper functioning during and after construction. Any required supporting structures shall be supplied by the Contractor as work incidental to the contract. 6. The contractor shall immediately notify the Engineer of any conflicts between existing utilities, and the proposed construction. The Engineer will coordinate with the Utility Company in question to determine the need for relocation of the existing utility. 7. Existing conditions such as sand in manholes or valve boxes shall be identified by the Contractor and these shall be reported to the Engineer prior to excavation by the Contractor. Once construction has begun, all damage to underground utilities will be assumed to have been caused by the Contractor, any repairs necessary shall be performed by the Contractor at the Contractor's expense. 8. Final Plat shall govern for easements. 9. The Contractor shall coordinate with the local jurisdiction to obtain permits and meter for water source. All associated costs shall be incidental to the Contract, including disposal of test water into City's sanitary sewer system. The Contractor shall not operate gate valves or hydrants on the City's water supply system. 10. The Contractor shall notify the City Engineer and the Project Engineer 48 hours prior to starting work or as required by the local jurisdiction or be subject to being shut down. 11. The Contractor shall keep access roads clear of soil or other debris, and perform daily street cleaning as required by the NPDES permit. Positive drainage, controlled with erosion control and erosion prevention measures as required by the NPDES permit shall be performed. Inlet protection shall be installed within 48 hours after inlet construction. Unless specified on the plans or as a bid item on the Bid Form, any temporary culverts, ditches, filter fabric, etc. necessary to accomplish this shall be performed as incidental to the Contract. 12. The Contractor shall preserve and protect the markers and monuments set for the subdivision of the land. 13. The Contractor shall schedule the soils engineer to facilitate certification of all controlled fills in a timely fashion. Density tests shall meet the following: A. Density tests shall be taken on all trenches at locations as determined by the Engineer or his representative. B. Within the upper 3' of streets, private drives and parking lots, Contractor shall utilize approved soils that are within 1% optimum moisture content as defined by the Standard Proctor Test -ASTM: D-698 with 100% Standard Proctor Density and not exceeding compaction by more than 1%. Below the upper 3', compaction shall meet 95%. Grading tolerances shall be 0.1'. 14. The Owner shall pay for all testing of soils compaction. Any areas which fail to meet the above standards shall be corrected and re -tested by the Owner's testing agent at the Contractor's expense. 15. All water main shall be installed with a minimum of 7.5 feet of cover. 16. Contractor shall provide temporary traffic control in compliance with MN/DOT "Temporary Traffic Control Zone Layouts Field Manual" most recent version for construction adjacent to travel ways. 17. Contractor shall be responsible for verification of the depth of existing stubs listed on this plan prior to the ordering of any fittings, structures, castings, etc. Engineer, Owner or City shall not be responsible for any discrepancies found as depths are estimated. 18. The contractor shall coordinate schedule with adjacent property owners to minimize disturbance for water shut down and temporary closure of access if necessary. 19. The contractor shall be responsible for coordinating with utility companies for power pole and/or line relocation required. 20. The contractor shall provide all necessary traffic control. 21. The contractor shall be responsible for all grading and restoration required to restore surfaces to like kind existing condition. 22. Existing curb and pavement damaged or impacted on adjacent property shall be restored with in-kind materials and section. All match lines are to be saw cut. 23. The contractor shall obtain a Utility Excavation Permit from the City Public Works Department prior to commencement of utility connections. CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER 958 .957 ` \ ` - - 959 OF SECTION 14, T. , 0.4 FT. WEST OF LOT CORNER 959 .960 �� _ I N 89°14 00 E T \` 960 ^ _ X y03.4 61 N 89°14 00 E 961-'----r-----962g---------- _-��----- ---- ------ ------3123.56----- -- 962 ----- L.- y. 8 i iv y i 4 cf' t 962 5 y _O _ "- _ - - _ i 1899 964.2X '�--'- 963- -� - f -= ------------------------ ------------------� �G. ��- .7 _��- __ C? It / 961.3 -- _P�__- ^963.70 a�6�Q= ��y ---_ ---------961- 1 / 00000 ,`S�� 3 MOw_, _;o o �°a 00 R __- - 962_--1� -- �.-- 66 INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS. - a° � 4? - - �� - SHED - -LINE - i� \.\`I` TC 958.96 = M- _ _ _ - _ - 1 X 961.6 61 - - 960-Q�\ - �--_ C'k I - _-�_--�9 X960.2 -INoh°'�� / \\� S9� �``��v �� \STOP 960.5x; I; -LANDSCAPE CO PROJECT LOCATION PLAN -- TEL. �G x ,; _X x \ RISER EDGING/MULCH C2 GITE PLAN RADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN LANDSCAPE- GOLDEN EAGLE ROAD h�� '��CB ', _ _ �h EDGING /ROCK °' �LEV.=958.16_ - _--SOUTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL r- - - - - - - _ _ 8c SHRUBS 1 � PARK (DOC.# 275353) AS MONUMENTED; ALSO C3 SANITARY AND WATER UTILITY PLAN SAN MH X I NORTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF KLEIN FARMS I I I C4 STORM SEWER UTILITY PLAN ELEV.=958.59--. 958.7 I ESTATES 2ND ADDITION (DOC.# 753470) I I I C5 LANDSCAPE PLAN ------ -------I� \ � I I I I I I C6 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C7 EXISTING CONDITIONS AND REMOVALS PLAN Ga I I I I I I I C8 DETAILS I I/ JI F__I n I I F__n F_ -)A ,h �` Fr_ (` _T_A I�� ` �h� �� N I I � n n f-`1 I S I /� N I I ► I I C 9 PHASING PLAN w ct kr) W �kr) O� M r^ O ctCn p ct ct WO� CU LU 0 ' z O (0 �, CL _ CC C Q CIO a Cc to ■� Q W) Cn - Lft 1lft a: caw Z �Z W �� ZE Q:� r -LW � W c o w < 0, mm�O m wo O ,v o z '~ mibm O Q ct Q ca W z ■Nam v /co a o V 00 Co CZ q o 42 DoE W oo _;J_ N °c 01 -6 o" c x l o m U U 0 W oo_�._ a Q p N0. 00633 ' �0 c2 o�� c`o c ° U a' �. -I- S J CC\ s q° Q. 2 0 m Cl CL V 00 (DN W DoE W oo �} U �� 01 -6 LLJ x l o m U U 0 W oo_�._ FILE N0. 00633 ' �0 m Cl CL C3 Sanitary and Water Utility Plan V 00 oo W 3 LLJ 0 0 0 FILE N0. 00633 C3 Sanitary and Water Utility Plan I I I I FES-EI ; 18" RCP FES -D; 18" RCP INV=959.70 INV=958.80 - WITH 3.6 CY CL3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - �- _ RIP -RAP WITH FABRIC- - - - - 40 LF 18 RCP CL3 lb ROAD PIPE @ 0.LUD 40 LF 18 RCP CL3 DUNDAS ),°' LENGTH INCLUDES FES I PIPE @ 0.75%; }<a' ' FES -C• 18" RCP LENGTH INCLUDES FES - - - - - n" n I p „ -i I I I I I NV=958.60 I I I -_-144 LF 24" PERFORATED ' 144 LF 24 PERFORATED I WITH 3.6 CY CL3 I FES -F; 18" RCP I DUAL -WALL HDPE PIPE DUAL -WALL HDPE PIPE RIP -RAP WITH FABRIC ' INV=960.00 @ 0.00% WITHIN L� @ 0.00% WITHIN -4- - ' '- '� 5' MH O - ► U � INFILTRATION ROCK g 0� IM ELEV.=96 ♦- INFILTRATION ROCK = I 6 SAN MH I • 61- TRENCH; SEE DETAIL 9�� TRENCH; SEE DETAIL FES -A h1 I �°� Q THIS SHEET 960.OZo - i 959.9 INV. EL V 4215 RCP RIM ELEV.=961.96 �• I THIS SHEET �� - - 60=960 so)<' " 60 959.7 961.11 ---•--fit I X ,� INV=958.70 INV. ELEV.=943.7 , °� � _ _ - 960 r �_ _ _ I ,< _ - - - - __ ss8� gig- -I� - WITH 2.9 CY CL3 �o -960- - - _ _ °,80 4'5 X 958.6 I _---961 9g9 - 959.2X - - XJ) --_ (X 959.3 x- �o�os+' ss -- RIP -RAP WITH FABRIC 959.7. _ 960.6 X T p- - T T T - T T T - T T �S-�9 960 X\ T- -9�0 q6�- -SOI 8>0_. RISER- - - - - g6o� �Ic". �" 1 ' 1 •, _ 1961ro !RL 1 ; 8 LF 18" RCP CL3 - - - - - - ----9b? - - - - - - - - _ ---_-962- PIPE--- ----------- - »_ - - - - - �(I @ 1.67% 962 962.1 s _ - -=- ---- - - 1 �� X- _ - _ _ '6' - - _ s (0--_ 001.5 96��1 LENGTH INCLUDES FES -o A '30 �6ry �. ; 9ts .4 I ! CB -8 -9 - - - - �o # CB -1 }� s 60 DIA CONCRETE s� 9 - - 60 DIA CONCRETE EA SE96 r �� 9s2 - _ NEENAH CASTING R-3067 �`, ti° NEENAH CASTING R-3067 CB -9 ---- X RE=961.10 '1 ��6�� I ' p RE=961.20 962.8X Q ;' �'-ss2� 48" DIA CONCRETE - _ -96 - _ IE(S)=958.00 (12" IN) ss 1 x'62.' X IE(S)=957.00 (24" IN) NEENAH CASTING R-3067 � ? I �' . RE=961.20 33 __.._ __ ____-__---.._-- -- °- IE(W)=957.00 (24" IN) - ---- - ° I `J I m IE(W)=957.00 (24" IN) I rn - ------ 1 - IE(E)=957.00 (24" OUT) ; IE(NE)=959.00 (18" OUT) IE(E)=957.00 (24 OUT) i I IE(SUMP)=954.00 (3 DEPTH) \ _ z I ' IE(SUMP)=954.00 (3' DEPTH) IE(SUMP)=954.00 (3' DEPTH) 109 109 I I !II h IL 9li'.2 86 LF 12" DUAL- WALL CB -16 41 IIS HDPE PIPE @ 1.16% _ _ - 27" DIA CONCRETE ' I 96215 1 148 LF 24" PERFORATED {1 1 o' - "" . �° NEENAH CASTING R-4342 d LLJ i I 96�� i i P°� CO ' \ " BUILDING A 2 RE=962.50 II I X61.9 DUAL -WALL HDPE PIPE \ 9;,2.5 III 976 SF i�g6 ~ IE(E)=959.00 (12" OUT) II I fi 1 @ 0.00% WITHIN 963.1 X) O f I I;; 6' �i ii ;s! \ INFILTRATION ROCK I I \ TRENCH; SEE DETAIL FFE = 963.50 ' 1 THIS SHEET FFE=963.50 �" ° I \ X'9 0- \ 11 I - 144 LF 24" PERFORATED '�6� X 61 ..3 \ �� \ X9157 - `�? I I I ss2sl,; \ 144 LF 24 PERFORATED ly DUAL -WALL HDPE PIPE Nl�; \ DUAL -WALL HDPE PIPE >°°�°0000�°"°°°°°°°° © 0.00% WITHIN -9� 1 LI�JE 9s� ° ° ° \° ° ° @ 0.00% WITHIN __ INFILTRATION ROCK >r0 I \ I / I I _.,o I ----- INFILTRATION ROCK - --- TRENCH; SEE DETAIL / I I'� \ X I - TRENCH; SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET - I' m 1 963.7 96.5 X 1 _ . - . . -THIS SHEET - - - . °o . - . - - I 1 ryo ss�� X\961\8X 963.7 I s I I ° ° \ \ OP Cn -{ 967. I I I �o I / g6� I g6� I * 964.3 I - -L,,�, ° CB -2 [7 1 I �� , - CB -10 X R _o,-� I 60" DIA CONCRETE I rn 1 • CB -11 ---- ; - 48 DIA CONCRETE -°- o /� NEENAH CASTING R-3067 I I X"� 48 DIA CONCRETE °o° °-°-°-°- °"°"° °�w °-° NEENAH CASTING R-2573 °6 I 961 RE=961.60 j�0�/_ I ss2 NEENAH CASTING R-3067 °^° ° ° ^ ^ ^ RE=961.90 IE(S)=957.00 (24 IN) RE=961.60 IE(W)=957.00 (24" IN) " " LINE 11 I I \ ; IE(W)=957.00 (24 IN) co I I IE(E)=957.00 (24 OUT) IE(E)=957.00 (24 OUT) _ X \!-,w M(IE(N)=957.00 (24" OUT) w I IE(SUMP)=954.00 (3 DEPTH)_° IE(SUMP)=954.00 (3 DEPTH) {y I�� A LIIIE(SUMP)=954.00 (3' DEPTH) 'C�t7n (� nl III nlh Ir- n d ii \' I i1 I I I I I ; 11 / BUILDING C �� CB -17 `° I�bti`'° X961 ;''I X 960.6 I I I I I .,o III I X X 963.9 ' ti I', l 6 9 76 SF 27 DIA CONCRETE I 10 ;/ X 9�0. w 96 6 964.5 X I I I I��6I 5�' i NEENAH CASTING R-4342 I ii - 962 I 11 I I II I I 11 962 i / 74 LF 12" DUAL -WALL E(E) 6959 00 (12" OUT) I,1, I 2.50 All,WO 11 INCE FFE 136 LF 24 PERFORATED HDPE PIPE @ 1.35% N 1 W „ 964.4 1 °j 'I COQ + \- `O 109 °' 109 i Il, - I z DUAL -WALL HDPE PIPE 9 i,2., 00N -I -o7 LINE „ ° p @ 0.00% WITHIN I r, v cF, X 961 .5 -144 LF 24 PERFORATED -�6ti� ;; f w I -144 LF 24 PERFORATED 7, DUAL -WALL HDPE PIPE 11 0 I INFILTRATION ROCK = DUAL- WALL HDPE PIPE -------- ----- = 9sr--------- ----- - X96 r9 --- -- - - @ 0.00% WITHIN �;' Ilbti 96 5' O I X TRENCH; SEE DETAIL \ 1 I 9s I I s?8 r @ 0.00% WITHIN ;e° INFILTRATION ROCK 311 I THIS SHEET INFILTRATION ROCK I TRENCH; SEE DETAIL TRENCH; SEE DETAIL '�° __ THIS SHEET 962T �° - _THIS- SHEET o \ °'6 - 6`'� 19s I# �'` F� X1 5 51 o =---'3 ---------- ----- ti �" �. i ;1 titi 0 61• 6ti 962 ° '20 ' \ X I 9 h6��62.3I °° \I q6� ° 1 I ,� a�959.4 �� X 963.8 'I 19s I 962 ° tih° --962.-_9&� °,6�°----a6��u61.4 9s�- .°,eI ISI \\ \ I II 96--- 96-� -- 'tom t I 1 moo,' ° li oo - \---,CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER +�- • .0 6ti _ CB -12 I I, ti° I CB -3 I i i I I i% II It9 I I I I I i „ 1 9rO I i „ 1 II 60 DIA CONCRETE D. 1 59 60 DIA CONCRETE • a CB j 13 - �° NEENAH CASTING R-2573 - 1 9280 " '� NEENAH CASTING R-3067 963.4X /X 962.7 • 11 I ---- s_ II I 62 48 DIA CONCRETE \ 6N j 11 NEENAH CASTING R-3067 963----- �.�--- RE 961.10 f 11 1 I RE=961.10 / 11 '� I IE(N)=958.00 (12;; IN) I 11 mac' 1, � o IE(S) =957.00 (24 IN) IRE=961.10 �- IE(S)=958.00 (12 IN) 11 I I IE(W)-957.00 (24 IN) IE(E)=957.00 (24 OUT) x61.3 01. I IE(N)=957.00 (24 OUT) IE(SUMP)=954.00 (3 DEPTH) IE(W)=957.00 (24 IN) 1I I I 0 1 IE(SUMP)=954.00 (3' DEPTH) CHAINLINK ---�^ 9'2• IEE -957.00 (24 OUT) FENCE + �- 1 i 11 /' f IE(SUMP)=954.00 (3' DEPTH) ON LOT LINE. 74 LF 12 DUAL -WALL 16ti'I I \ \ HDPE PIPE @ 1.35% 5° r I9 I 10, _ 1 \ \ oX 960.5 06 r = IIS BUILDING E CB -18 II - 41.I _ I \ \ 11 • 962��,1 1 \ X 958.6 6, 9 76 SF 27" DIA CONCRETE I I 1i = 0 1 NEENAH CASTING R-4342 \\ RE=962.50 I X 60.4 \ _ I FFE=963.50 IE(E)=959.00 (12 OUT) ° ° I 9 Hyl ' 962 1V61.� X a�1.5 144 LF 24" PERFORATED X 9 _ .9 116 �- �__5.1 \- .50 k 144 LF 24 PERFORATED 0 X 962.6 �l/• I I' r °"° °^° ° ° o ° °_°-o_ DUAL -WALL HDPE PIPE ) I, " o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0"0 0 0 1 k°o°�°uo0o0o0o0 DUAL -WALL HDPE PIPE -^ ^ �� - /a-, / I � 1 • ,'�9s� @ 0.00% WITHIN i i © 0.00% WITHIN �6"'• �` `9 /, I \ INFILTRATION ROCK / 0 1 X 958.7 INFILTRATION ROCK TRENCH; SEE DETAIL 6 / I ` TRENCH; SEE DETAIL �, - , - . - . -- . - • .° 1 \ 1 \ _ , . - . • - oo THIS SHEET s ° I sTHIS SHEET 6ti. I 0 0 I ''90 j7 q .) \ \,9n do6 CB -14 CB -4 CB_ 15 Q I -'�_' 48" DIA CONCRETE < 961.3 �° 1 96\�' 60" DIA CONCRETE () 48" DIA CONCRETE \�____ NEENAH CASTING R-2573----=°6�=---7 I 0 912. NEENAH CASTING R-3067 -_X_9 .5 RE=961.90 °"°�o�o�o�s�o�os h° 1 \\ NEENAH CASTING R-3067 o° °"°"° o ``ro I `RE=961.60 Mill°^ ° ° ° ° ° ° ° �\ IE(W)=957.00 (24" IN) I � RE=961.60 IE(E)=957.00 (24 OUT) IE(E)=957.00 (24 OUT) IE(S)=957.00 (24" IN) IE(SUMP)=954.00 (3' DEPTH) IE(SUMP)=954.00 (3' DEPTH) ! 11 1 X 961. IE(W)=957.00 (24" IN) ",IE(N)=957.00 (24" OUT) i 11 NoI �tih°\ of III nimr� u v il9�i ht X962.7 }96ry SII BUILDING G y� \ CB -19 CO 6ti. �I10 , 6, 9 76 SF I 27 DIA CONCRETE X 90.11 ' I { 962.3 NEENAH CASTING R-4342 CHAINLINK --� I \ I ! II 0 X62.3 RE=962.50 FENCE +�- I -I FFE=963.50 \\ IE(E)=959.00 (12" OUT) I I X 960.7 0.5 FT. WEST: 86 LF 12" DUAL -WALL--' \ 109 i 1 0 1 OF LOT LINE. I HDPE PIPE @ 1.16% � IIR ° 1 I 1 A I ('910 �. 63 1 CV o (0 9s2.3 I� I �- __ 963 -- --- - _- 's - _-_-_-- -C-- ___ �_--- = 9i--t----�---- I -��°1 qIt s -- ---- ----- �� _--_ _-_--- �2 a ,! N IIs? i 14 LF 24" PERFORATED I j0 \ 114 LF 24 PERFORATED JII II I I " \ DUAL -WALL HDPE PIPE 11 fi o X 960.6 110 DUAL- WALL HDPE PIPE I \ @ 0.00% WITHIN o, ! 961 $ Ij / _ X � 1.1 961.80 f @ 0.00% WITHIN ti� o „ 1 9s I I INFILTRATION ROCK titi ! ;; \ ''-9s ?� INFILTRATION ROCK 1, TRENCH; SEE DETAIL i '6 1 0 9 15 j ?20 0 TRENCH; SEE DETAIL 'ss, 9f;2 THIS SHEET -----------J ! THIS SHEET e ---Q61 : 1 962.6X--- ------------------- „------------ _ 0 9629X - .._ --_X-==962_" -°j- .� - - ,.� --+t - - , 62 961 / "I 961 �F2 F 1 960 0 LANDSCAPE 16 LF 24" PERFORATED � 959 DUAL -WALL HDPE PIPE / 960 959 X Jtl�2.� 958 @ 0.00% LENGTH 9 958 957 �� I \ 957 .60" DIA CONCRETE E CORNER +\ - INCLUDES FES - _ < NEENAH CASTING R-3067 >':-1ck( _1 X S,° \- ��--_- // ��/ 962.2X\ -_96 �_�X961.8 LOT LINE 96- FES -B RE=961.40 IE(W)=957.00 (24" IN) LINE OF THE NORTHEAST 24" RCP _ CB -7 C8-6 -957 IE(N)=957.00 (24" OUT) SECTION 14, T. 121, R. 25 CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER INV=957.00 60" DIA CONCRETE ` �' 60" DIA CONCRETE , 958 ' N 89°14'00" E 0.4 FT. WEST OF LOT CC WITH 5.8 CY CL3 �'�' T� - •, _ _ NEENAH CASTING R-3067 I ` �a 1 IE(SUMP)=954.00 (31 DEPTH) „ �er n I T NEENAH CASTING R -3067.27X N 89°14 00 E RIP -RAP WITH FABRIC' 96 = �nJ 4 ------RE= 961.40 ------ - -- -- ------1899.53----- RE-961.40 9. �s i iv � ,y"i � -o_ `1--------,_, -- -----3123.56----- 964.2 �� \ =-963 962- IES -957.00 (24" IN) �--� IE(N)=958.00 (12 IN) - ;�- _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ - _ �< - - () -, IE(W)=957.00 (24 IN) --------------------�=---•-IE(E)=957.00 (24" OUT) /� 961.3 IE(SUMP)=954.00 (3' DEPTH) - - - _ _ - /1,_00 o - - _ IE(E)=957.00 (24" OUT) ° ° s mow- 2- - -lao--- IE SUMP)=954.00 (3' DEPTH) --_Iii r -LINE = -e - -` 960 QR\��V TC 958.96 = M' _ _ - - (` - _ _ _ I X961 -6_q61 " X 960.2 ��. -,CURB XI '---TEL. _ 960 Goho' X \959, °``33 STOP 960.5 I --TEL. '-- LANDSCAPE _X X \ 11% RISER EDGING/MULCH �� LANDSCAPE- GOLDEN EAGLE ROAD h�� '��cB ',, �h EDGING ROCK °' �LEV.=958 16 _ -SOUTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL � / � PARK (DOC.# 275353) AS MONUMENTED; ALSO & SHRUBS SAN MH X \ I NORTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF KLEIN FARMS ELEV.=958.59 958.7 F- - - - - -I- - - - - I ESTATES 2ND ADDITION (DOC.# 753470) I I F__ A IS A ,h am Fr_( -_T_ A I S F__ l N I I A nF_`i I _T_ Gp� 1 INFILTRATION ZONE MNDOT SELECT GRANULAR MATERIAL 1.0' ABOVE PIPE 12" ABOVE PIPE I r- - - - - -- r-- INFILTRATION ZONE " TO 2" WASHED AND CRUSHED STONE MATERIAL 12" TO SIDES AND 12" BELOW PIPE 24" PERFORATED HDPE PIPE 1.0' BELOW PIPE r PROJECT LOCATION PART OF THE SW4 AND NE4, SECTION 14 TOWNSHIP 121, RANGE 25, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA. EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 2, BLOCK 3, OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA. n 0 30 60 90 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET SURVEY DATA SURVEY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY: MEYER ROHLIN LAND SERVICES 708 1st AVENUE NE BUFFALO, MN 55313 DATED: APRIL 18, 2017 BENCHMARK: MN/DOT GEODETIC MONUMENT "8605 S" ELEVATION = 966.55 NAVD88 DATUM GENERAL UTILITY NOTES 1. Specifications applicable for this project: Current standard specifications for the City of Monticello, MN and all Minnesota Department of Health and MPCA requirements except where modified by these contract documents. 2. OSHA requirements shall be followed for all work on this project. 3. The Contractor shall notify "Gopher State One Call" prior to any excavation (651 -454-0002 or 1 -800-252-1166 out state.) 4. The Contractor shall verify all locations and elevations of underground utilities with utility companies prior to any construction (storm sewer, sanitary sewer, water, natural gas, telephone, electric, etc.), and immediately notify the Engineer of any conflicts. 5. The Contractor shall protect all existing utilities and facilities to allow proper functioning during and after construction. Any required supporting structures shall be supplied by the Contractor as work incidental to the contract. 6. The contractor shall immediately notify the Engineer of any conflicts between existing utilities, and the proposed construction. The Engineer will coordinate with the Utility Company in question to determine the need for relocation of the existing utility. 7. Existing conditions such as sand in manholes or valve boxes shall be identified by the Contractor and these shall be reported to the Engineer prior to excavation by the Contractor. Once construction has begun, all damage to underground utilities will be assumed to have been caused by the Contractor, any repairs necessary shall be performed by the Contractor at the Contractor's expense. 8. Final Plat shall govern for easements. 9. The Contractor shall coordinate with the local jurisdiction to obtain permits and meter for water source. All associated costs shall be incidental to the Contract, including disposal of test water into City's sanitary sewer system. The Contractor shall not operate gate valves or hydrants on the City's water supply system. 10. The Contractor shall notify the City Engineer and the Project Engineer 48 hours prior to starting work or as required by the local jurisdiction or be subject to being shut down. 11. The Contractor shall keep access roads clear of soil or other debris, and perform daily street cleaning as required by the NPDES permit. Positive drainage, controlled with erosion control and erosion prevention measures as required by the NPDES permit shall be performed. Inlet protection shall be installed within 48 hours after inlet construction. Unless specified on the plans or as a bid item on the Bid Form, any temporary culverts, ditches, filter fabric, etc. necessary to accomplish this shall be performed as incidental to the Contract. 12. The Contractor shall preserve and protect the markers and monuments set for the subdivision of the land. 13. The Contractor shall schedule the soils engineer to facilitate certification of all controlled fills in a timely fashion. Density tests shall meet the following: A. Density tests shall be taken on all trenches at locations as determined by the Engineer or his representative. B. Within the upper 3' of streets, private drives and parking lots, Contractor shall utilize approved soils that are within 1% optimum moisture content as defined by the Standard Proctor Test -ASTM: D-698 with 100% Standard Proctor Density and not exceeding compaction by more than 1%. Below the upper 3', compaction shall meet 95%. Grading tolerances shall be 0.1'. 14. The Owner shall pay for all testing of soils compaction. Any areas which fail to meet the above standards shall be corrected and re -tested by the Owner's testing agent at the Contractor's expense. 15. All water main shall be installed with a minimum of 7.5 feet of cover. 16. Contractor shall provide temporary traffic control in compliance with MN/DOT "Temporary Traffic Control Zone Layouts Field Manual most recent version for construction s. adjacent to travel ways. Y 17. Contractor shall be responsible for verification of the depth of existing stubs listed on this plan prior to the ordering of any fittings, structures, castings, etc. Engineer, Owner or City shall not be responsible for any discrepancies found as depths are estimated. 18. The contractor shall coordinate schedule with adjacent property owners to minimize disturbance for water shut down and temporary closure of access if necessary. 19. The contractor shall be responsible for coordinating with utility companies for power pole and/or line relocation required. 20. The contractor shall provide all necessary traffic control. 21. The contractor shall be responsible for all grading and restoration required to restore surfaces to like kind existing condition. 22. Existing curb and pavement damaged or impacted on adjacent property shall be restored with in-kind materials and section. All match lines are to be saw cut. 23. The contractor shall obtain a Utility Excavation Permit from the City Public Works Department prior to commencement of utility connections. CASTING I CASTING 954.0011r s ALL SUMP STRUCTURES TO HAVE 2 - 3" WEEP HOLES IN BASE SLAB STRUCTURE AND INFILTRATION ZONE SECTION VIEW TYPICAL SLOPE TRENCH SIDES PER 11 -OSHA REQUIREMENTS - - Illi 12" MINIMUM SELECT GRANULAR i SELECT 1111 -- MNDOT ABOVESPEC P PE 9.2B 111111 �� FILL i - INITIAL ENCASE STONE 12" 12" BACKFILL MATERIAL IN D Illll HAUNCHING - - - GEOTEXTILE FABRIC MNDOT SPEC 3733 - 12" TYPE 1 ll 11111 BEDDING 11111E 11111®11111111116 11111®11111= 1. BEDDING SHALL BE a' TO 2' WASHED AND CRUSHED STONE MATERIAL 2. FILL PLACEMENT SHALL BE PLACED IN 8" MAX. LOOSE LIFTS AND COMPACTED TO 95% STANDARD PROCTOR. 3. GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TO BE PLACE ON TOP AND SIDES OF TRENCH ONLY. NO FABRIC ON BOTTOM. INFILTRATION ROCK TRENCH DETAIL 954.001( r s ALL SUMP STRUCTURES TO HAVE 2 - 3" WEEP HOLES IN BASE SLAB STRUCTURE AND INFILTRATION ZONE SECTION VIEW CB -1 INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: CO PROJECT LOCATION PLAN C1 SITE PLAN C2 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN C3 SANITARY AND WATER UTILITY PLAN C4 STORM SEWER UTILITY PLAN C5 LANDSCAPE PLAN C6 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C7 EXISTING CONDITIONS AND REMOVALS PLAN C8 DETAILS C9 PHASING PLAN 0�4 �m L U CU W O CC CIO 0 L Co W Z UJW a: � O Q. 1 INFILTRATION ZONE '0 1 INFILTRATION ZONE 1.0' ABOVE PIPE MNDOT SELECT GRANULAR MATERIAL W) 1.0' ABOVE PIPE MNDOT SELECT GRANULAR MATERIAL 12" ABOVE PIPE 100 Z 12" ABOVE PIPE O t 1 Q W 0 18" RCP W Lv W OUTLET PIPE O DO 24" PERFORATED INFILTRATION ZONE Qct O 24" PERFORATED INFILTRATION ZONE HDPE PIPE" TO 2" WASHED AND 959.00 HDPE PIPE J" TO 2" WASHED AND ti CRUSHED STONE MATERIAL CRUSHED SHED STONE MATERIAL O 12" TO SIDES AND V TO SIDES AND 12" BELOW PIPE 12" BELOW PIPE V957.00 957.00,1 957.00., I T - A i 1.0' BELOW PIPE 1.0' BELOW PIPE r r 36" SUMP 36" SUMP 954.0011r s ALL SUMP STRUCTURES TO HAVE 2 - 3" WEEP HOLES IN BASE SLAB STRUCTURE AND INFILTRATION ZONE SECTION VIEW TYPICAL SLOPE TRENCH SIDES PER 11 -OSHA REQUIREMENTS - - Illi 12" MINIMUM SELECT GRANULAR i SELECT 1111 -- MNDOT ABOVESPEC P PE 9.2B 111111 �� FILL i - INITIAL ENCASE STONE 12" 12" BACKFILL MATERIAL IN D Illll HAUNCHING - - - GEOTEXTILE FABRIC MNDOT SPEC 3733 - 12" TYPE 1 ll 11111 BEDDING 11111E 11111®11111111116 11111®11111= 1. BEDDING SHALL BE a' TO 2' WASHED AND CRUSHED STONE MATERIAL 2. FILL PLACEMENT SHALL BE PLACED IN 8" MAX. LOOSE LIFTS AND COMPACTED TO 95% STANDARD PROCTOR. 3. GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TO BE PLACE ON TOP AND SIDES OF TRENCH ONLY. NO FABRIC ON BOTTOM. INFILTRATION ROCK TRENCH DETAIL 954.001( r s ALL SUMP STRUCTURES TO HAVE 2 - 3" WEEP HOLES IN BASE SLAB STRUCTURE AND INFILTRATION ZONE SECTION VIEW CB -1 INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: CO PROJECT LOCATION PLAN C1 SITE PLAN C2 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN C3 SANITARY AND WATER UTILITY PLAN C4 STORM SEWER UTILITY PLAN C5 LANDSCAPE PLAN C6 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C7 EXISTING CONDITIONS AND REMOVALS PLAN C8 DETAILS C9 PHASING PLAN 0�4 �m L U CU W O CC CIO 0 L Co W Z UJW a: � O Q. a o 00 qL O2 L• ` I + N0) N (� (0 N C C I p E V L O Z W I OLO O�-6 CO o IZ 4 y p W I m ��- oEo 100UN0 r3 (1: CZ ►, 00 O -cow q,OC v J O -b ", c m U O O D Il ° b C ,J �3 a N '0 Q) QDz �CL O W) CnCL a: I - 100 Z zJ J O w O Q W 0 W Lv W O DO Till Qct O CLU) a o 00 qL O2 L• ` I + N0) N (� (0 N C C I p E V L O Z W I OLO O�-6 CO o IZ 4 y p W I m ��- oEo 100UN0 r3 (1: CZ ►, 00 O -cow q,OC v J O -b ", c m U O O D Il ° b C ,J �3 a FILE N0. 00633 Storm Sewer Utility Plan 100 O N11 O DO V ti Q O O p V FILE N0. 00633 Storm Sewer Utility Plan 0 00 I 1 I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i T 1 Lul O_10 1 SAN MH 1 1 RIM ELEV.=961.96 INV. ELEV.=943.7 ,°��4°• __R_ ,(___-961 960.6 Xj. ooh `��o=T os r 962.1 I 9 _q �N PT ;I .•3o e ,I•i.�l 962.8X Q 0 ✓�' 2 0 X29 / .r 1 ' I DUNDAS �� ROAD �C� - C I X - 1 10 D.I.P. � o \15" R.C.P. i = ► i �- T� m c � I �N MH WB M o -�; 96,0 ooh 1 /96� RIM ELEV.=960.04 `� 960.00 - �� 959.90 INV. ELF�V,.=942.8 6 96 66 r� ) c' - - , °6°�= 960°so) (, 60 \ 959.79 ( - _ 960 p l� I�l�s I~ % * 9°� 1 _ g�9- - - - - - 4 c_-_ � -� �• � »-9-+; _X958.6 �9 �T T - T 96 X 959. q6�6°=��°I-9S8�o_ RISER ,I iii �✓"r-,9b- Hr _ -� , ` _ - ----962 - - p�, 962 X 961.5 ----- ` '� _ _M_ X _ _ ' -6_____60 fir° ' 9uq'.4 'Io .T , 0 9 - �o I o - -�°` �0 962 bry� bti° ss eEAS ,9iT17962�� / ° --- ?A ; _ i' ti° ' '� 'X 963.0 96,I --- - \ 0°- 2� I I� V V \ Lit �i ,v II�0 `°� - --------- -- 963 ---- -----\umm n •0) X96--- ------------------ � -- 963 --------- I �� -- __ _ --- I -- i`�n 1 ill: 11 1 I"I I ,: 1 �< = I II •� I I� I Y - I 0 -1. r SIONL I C) 10 9 6 1- - 109 0 C7 • I MULCH I I -I oP 0 LY - a 96215, �- . \ I X 963.5 II ° I_ X 962.2 K 1 \ EDGING 0 <I I 50; � o°_----------- � II I \ LLI I 962 I1 K FG BUILDING A 862 y°6� BUILDING B 0 it ;I 1 X61.9 \► X 92 ;5 6, 9 76 SF 6, 9 76 SF o 11 I I I\ \ 963.1 X\ 0 1 I I1 0 11 1 ;� \ 1 X 964.2 FFE-963.50 \ I I � fI �/X6 DS- FFE=963.50 0 116ti�1 \ XL96'0962.0 „M� o000°°0000�o�0 0ou°o�000�00�000�000000(bn0n0n0„O,�OB4O,•O_O_O_o_o n n I --LITE 19s�o \1 ----- __ I RomX - X a_ob963.7 96 .5X'1 96�� g X\961j8X 963.7 - -1� - - - . _ . - . - . - . -° - . - . - o6 0r O 0ry \ \ \ \ I -*co 961, ) / I 964.3 1 co I I I X--�65fi�6�� X :9r' .� 1 � -- - �` .... --Ja - ° °oo °o°o°o°oo0ono,�o00 ®�0 1 I I \ J u 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ono D o g o 0.0.0.0 n n 62._ °oOV°�°uou0000000000 0�0�0 o o o o-o-o_n n n rte^ iI i MOW --_ ' 1 96?s� 11 I 960.9 I IX g6�3 IX96�/ LINE ° 11 1 1 11 �X-MOW I I I I 0 0 -1 _ X 961.7 / 961.0 0`1 iN LINE O� � I w 1 /// `�� BUILDING D o�y�o.�.� ;� ► I� I I BUILDING C I I ; 1 Q � � ° ! ' oti' i �9 I I ,,I X 960.6 I I a� 964.5 X I j 1. 16�,o b / 0 6 9 76 SF 6,976 SF ®I ,� 1 0`�., 1 I x 960 x 96,x 963.9 I I ° 11� I o 4 I 1 ---WO _ _NCE 964.4 1 °j'1 CO E +\- .0 )12.; SON -1H _0 LINE I \ I I "962 I \ 11 96 . 1 ` 1 'so ► , �I I 11 ^I 1 I 962 it 1/ �8 U 0 II - I I FFE=963.50 FFE=963.50 1111 1 I 1 1 n l l I I I C ' c C, ; w 0 II I I 109 O / 109 11 1 °' I: Q o l l 1/ 0F1 -7 / ii 1 Q I I N I X 96 1 .9 a 4 -9 11 1 a I �963---- - ,., - o l II o I IIX 6� L � � _-------- --------- III I, I � -- -------------X96 . II o 9 X95.61 ------ 963.-- = -- --------=-------------- 1__ 96a--_ _ _ 6� 6 I' S/ I \0 \ II X 963.8 -- 1 60 1 \ 1 I I 11 i1 \ -�° h° �9 11 1 1 I ° I L. 6 - I 1 9 96ti 9�O 62 -; ;_ ` } foHS I I Fo' I I i 11 1 o_s�s0 + , 9 - ryo �o \ `'�o - 9s, 1 \ C" X 5 51 X 963.8 11'� �j 62.3 °otic \ ob5�o A61 �6ti 862 I 201 ' ■ X� 9594 �- I g / I o6 I ° • I 962 it I i i I 196c?2 ,✓ .y0 11 I9 I I Co KI -1 1 ' I I II 11 11A1 I I I 962 °°i i U)/ 160° 963.4X X 962.7• II h° 5 I ti° 1' \ \ I 862._-9fi1=�e`°�------a6ti�61.4 I 96� �6� I 1I ■ [�_°\ CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER + \- �' I \ I 1T96ti°� 1II 5.1 FT. EAST OF LOT LINE 1 1C\ \ Ex \ � 1 s�1 11 1f� o '59.0 I \ \ \ \-- --------I ..----i-?8° I ii 11 I \ \ \ \\ \ \ --- ------ 9-�r------------------------ - 963 --- - - - - II 10 ■ \ / e --- ---- ?��- -- 9 63 ------- -- I I ---- --------------- -- I I 61 I I \ \ II c -p 11 I l 0 10) I11 111 CHAINLINK ---�^ 9 h FENCE + \- ' II 1• ON LOT LINE. fro I;} / 962 6OI i �}- II II II II II / II II � 111 6 I 962.801.6 1 " r) 1 \ I I I a ' 11 I 1, . 0 I\\ Q 11 \ X 961.3 0 11 - II \\ \ X 962.4 109 II a �. \ X 9610.8 961.2 X j // c 11 I ° I _ 11 / / / o I11 o I \ \ o o \ \ oX 960.5 � 1 BUILDING E ��L BUILDING F o 1962 1I = \ \ I 9 76 SF o x 958.6 6,976 SF 6, o 11 � 11 - 1 1 I X 60.4 \ coo FFE=963.50 FFE.50 0 I X 961.5 \� X9 f9° 1 I 5.1 -cs I ��~Imo\ <o I 0 X 962.6 (� 1 1 1\ I u V o o- o" o 0 0"0 0 0 ono 1 \ V v u V-O-O-O-O`O-O`O"O Ono 0 0 0 4 0 O_O_O_n n V u u o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 onono 0 0 0 0 0 0_0_o_o_n ^ i. - J 1 • - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o_b_n IP o 'r s,o I 1 \ x�`° 8 i' f 9 1 I 1 X 958.7 61. 6� ro� 20 \_ byry° J 961PO ,01' o \ \ 1_� I / 1 1 1 0 9� ✓�� do i I c9 L; 96,->0 - C6b 961.4 X i X 961.3 �o 1? 96\� 4 C3 F - -7 0 d2..0 _ CO5 i - - ___ .: J J --O,�,O--O_O..O..O..OvOvOVOV OVOV O°°O�O�O�O�OI°O�C1°^°C•°^°^°^°^°^°° I X 962.7 CHAINLINK --� FENCE + \- 0.5 FT. WEST OF LOT LINE. II' )A1962.3 , 1962.3 11 I' I 11 I1� I I,1 (0 96Z 3011 0) N 1` i1 I � I 961.80 \ ; 9 �5 .A v u 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O„O_O_O_o_o 0 0 0 ouo°o°o 000000�0�0�0, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 �o \ 0 X 959.9 I I X 961.0 I X 961.3 0 1 1 1(•, TI \ 0 1 ° , Q7 O I 0 BUILDING H I I BUILDING G (. 0 :: `'t \ 6, 976 SF ° 1� I 96ry�1I 0 6,976 SF { 962.3 o I I \ " 751 FFE=963.50 11: 11 FFE=963.50 111 / 11: I X 960.7 C \ 4? \ 109 109 0 1 1 t r I I l \ a I a A 1 1-�- , _ 9 63 ----------- --- o -I ,; 6 N o __ --- --- I ---- -__963_-_ -__� -T=�-------- - �J_ C- T9o��;11 ;;' rn ____ -____I 6y`O° X9 1.1 X 960.6 96ti6 \ 6ti I I 951.7 T �° X 962.4 R g I I I! 96, 962 _� �6�. 962.6X °�h 6� C -- I------------ ---- -------------------- 962.9X ----------------------------C�-------------w -- --- --------------- , 962 s 061. O o - t_ 0 GRAS'S' 961 _ FV& 959 o LANDSCAPE 960 959 3< \��Z•ti `- �� 958 957 \ (o -EDGING/MULCH U) 9s, \ ,96\ ; -- CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER + \- ,,, I`1 I� U) -00 , - - _ Q' _ / , 962.2X - - _ _ X 961.8 �1 5.8 FT. EAST OF LOT LINE \ �C - 191- X 1 967.2 - (Ln Q / I ' �ry \ - - �' \� I'�� o 96� 9 ,--- SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST 1\i X a�2 r 957 1 1 1/4 OF SECTION 14, T. 121, R. 25 CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER + \- ( � E� - - - 957 `_ 958 0.4 FT. WEST OF LOT CORNER --�. --��.AMIL N 89°14'00" E ,�,�I� �' � - \ ------ 818°99.53 '00" E -----3123.56----- 9642X1^ - 3 3 --- --i -------------- 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - -� --- C) '/�^� `� 961.3 R__ _ -- j- "963.7 o o a 9( �� - - - - 1 00000 a S(� _ / �3 �gFMOW-,-=� °aQ�`3Q �R\-F� _961- �96 _�� -- x._,.66 o - - LINE - �, 960-\�� 4C 958.9 - _ - - - _ _ �� _-_SHED 2-= - - - - P _ - - _ _ I X 961.6-961 _ X 960.2 NO S �"3 \ ��` \ �,'CL CHAINLINK FENCE I -TEL - LANDSCAPE oho' CHAINLINK FENCE -J \959 �h 1 7 S � 6.0 FT HEIGHT 1 EDGING MULCH X 6.0 FT HEIGHT X 1 \� AT 1.0 FT FROM RISER LAND AT 1.0 FT FROM'DEN EAGLE ROAD h�. -�\C PROPERTY LINE F THE PLAT OF OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL �h EDGING, PROPERTY LINE °� _ -SOUTH LINE 0 8c SHRUBS \ PARK (DOC.# 275353) AS MONUMENTED; ALSO SAN MH I 1 1 I I/ F__ N I X I NORTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF KLEIN FARMS ELEV.=958.59 -- . 958.7 I ESTATES 2ND ADDITION (DOC.# 753470) 1 1 1 -----I------1 \ F__ A F__) A ,h Tr_ (-- _T_ A I _T_ F__ r- �h� N 1 IA F--"\ Fri I _T_ I fMF6 ♦ { s W& 9E dt i �- _M _ (612) 599-8G75 �crod�raaka r Ra MALS .w >o n.r.waL N- - PLTERNATE METHODS 0' ITEM STAKING PRE SHOWN. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S OPTION TO STAKE TREES: HOWEKR, THE CONTHACION IS RESPONSIBLE POR THE MNNTNNING TT8£S IN A PLUMB PO -ON THRWGHOUT lHE GUARANTEE PEPoOD. %APoI BOTTOM AND SIDES 01' HOLE PPoOR TO PLANRNG. CONI Q TO HAAS SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH UNLESS oTHwvnsT: NOTm. NO NULCH TO BE IN CONTACT WITH TRUNK. CONIFEROUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL rRIEM a SUM WAKE _y ii i(t l j 2-N ,r Min. (I J I L l 1 n. 0 30 60 90 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET SURVEY DATA SURVEY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY: MEYER ROHLIN LAND SERVICES 708 1st AVENUE NE BUFFALO, MN 55313 DATED: APRIL 18, 2017 BENCHMARK: MN/DOT GEODETIC MONUMENT "8605 S" ELEVATION = 966.55 NAVD88 DATUM PROJECT LOCATION PART OF THE SW4 AND NE4, SECTION 14 TOWNSHIP 121, RANGE 25, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA. EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 2, BLOCK 3, OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA. KEY QNTY SIZE NAME 00 ABM 6 2.5" BB Maple, Autumn Blaze RB 5 8' Clump Birch, River BHS 17 6' BB Spruce, Black Hills DS 104 #1 pot Daylily, Stella KFG 32 #1 pot Grass, Karl Foerster LANDSCAPING NOTES The landscape contractor must comply with all applicable federal, state, county, and local regulations governing landscape materials and work. All plant materials will be guaranteed for a period of one year from time of final acceptance from owner. Trees and perennials to be installed with suitable planting soil and fertilizer. Commercial black poly edging to be installed between turf areas and rock beds. 1.5"diameter river rock to be installed at 3"depth in all perennial beds over fabric weed barrier. All trees planted in turf areas to receive a 4' diameter mulch ring. Mulch to be shredded natural hardwood installed 6" deep with no mulch in contact with the tree trunk. Turf areas to be sodded with a locally grown bluegrass blend sod. Native seeding areas to be seeded with a native seed mix to be approved by the owner. Underground irrigation shall be provided for trees, shrubs, and sod areas. 15' POLYPROPWIUM at PaTntBnaE ()0 W. 1-1/r ■DE smAP tw. DOME STRAND 14 DA ME - Y • 1W KMRIAAL CM1 DIME WRAP T) FORT BRANCH T iomtx OE WIN DDME STRAND 04 GUM YM - J PER TEE C -r LAMM OF SHIMCCD WADTDDD MUCH N SAIICt9t-0I0,11) PASP SPARE IVIAL GRACE OF FLANt 911M ONOM GRAM 10O rxraD' SPANEs wr u r APART XMW WE BALL AT At= - 7 PDt �DAIf10RL wT1 "I"M UL �NUFwt PfDBPAL DP NOTES: TWO ALTERNATE METHODS OF TREE STAKING ARE SHOWN. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S OPTION TO STAKE TREES: HOWEVER, THE CONTRACTOR S RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTAINING TREES IN A PLUMB POSITION THROUGHOUT THE GUARANTEE PER, OD. SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF HOLE PRIOR TO PLANTING. DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL HAND LOOSEN ROOTS OF CONTAINERIZED MATERIAL (TYP.). SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF HOLE PRIOR TO PLANTING. SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: CO PROJECT LOCATION PLAN C1 SITE PLAN C2 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN C3 SANITARY AND WATER UTILITY PLAN C4 STORM SEWER UTILITY PLAN C5 LANDSCAPE PLAN C6 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C7 EXISTING CONDITIONS AND REMOVALS PLAN C8 DETAILS C9 PHASING PLAN � w � M oc WO� Lft ca W N O (o 10 w � Ld Q .CO CL Oto 1111111 �z 0111111•+Ca Z Z w CLW � Zi w 0 CL Wc o w< Noma O m wo ,v o z 7- CL O O C) CLW 0''~^^ CO v, FILE N0. 00633 cs Landscape P/an 00 O ti 0 )I - co Q o W W v FILE N0. 00633 cs Landscape P/an I I DUNDASROAD QC, I xo 1 - I ROCK CONSTRUCTION00 o II � 15 C P` L r ,-i ► `ENTRANCE INLET ,N MH Q. h PROTECTION SAN MH ; • 61'' o - `6 `96'0 o`ti (TYP.) M ELEV.=960.04 g 96 0 I.V. EL;},=942.8 RIM ELE INLET I I 961.11 ice' 6" DIA. ;0.66 "'� �C° �X _ )('. - - � �60�0 960 °so* ' X60 959.79 INV. ELE PROTECTION op Q0 -61- ,-� - - -BIO-LOG _ - - ..\ - /r _ 9se�• - -'"� ' e SILT FENCE I I (TYP.) �o -ynv- - - _ i X 95 I --9 1 9•I X �X 959.3 o s �.V 960.6 _ ►: ��'- 59.7. _V959T2.X - - �-� 6 o o S - %� J,0''�.• r: T T ' T T r - r 95�� . i, �� T_ 960 06�- ' �- RISER- _ rGo 1------------ � _- ��==-962 »»y�-- n ----- 961X 961 5`962 9 ---_",.=�_------------_"- � - -- - /-- C /� --- ----==---f °9�,�`- -- 1;��1' yb V ~962.1�o u1 _=__ - '�X�--_ - � _ _ - _ �6 DIA. - 01.5 ,�° 1-TFII��. 1 9t�o 4 �o - �� BIO -LOG II INLET INLET INLET -/ -g _ - 0 1 PROTECTIONPROTECTION ,�o`PROTECTION °6tikse '6v I,�- > (TYP.)(TYP.) A6rl'EASE (TYP.) R I``\lv°1 - - _ -----_ _---r \, 663.0 .9s��40__: rl X 9.9 IX363. _, �N ;I x19962.8X�;0 \ X61 ��o- \ -- 9s?eo'1 { X62. 0 W j; co �IILI -11620 _ 6 --963-=-==--_-- --- ---- -I: 963 ---------------- ---- ---µ- - -------------------- - i i CC) I I Q 109 I it SILT FENCE I II 109 I-oo _ !I-- SILT FENCE I1 9i'.2 __ �6�I I ! �h / I g6215;# \ I\ X 963.5 61. X 962.2 _ - I . 62 bah ; I I! \ 9 BUILDING A g62 +, BUILDING B X 61.9 1 9 ;;;2.15 I 6, 9 76 SF 6, 9 76 SF I 963.1 X; o I I I; INLET I I \ I X 964.2 • 1 PROTECTION X63.50 !,1 /X6 \X96 6) FFE=963.50 (nP.)It ,��6�lX 961.9 962.0.a°O°O I00 4j L \ 5�°�a 000000�o"o"000�00000000n) v�u0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0°0°°°°0 000" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n MW IuOo0ODO0oo O0�0�0�0°On nOr,OnO O O O O O O_o_n n n ---. T -_--_------_-__-- 6U O\ LI E ------ - - ----- - ------ / o - - X a, 0m963.7X96 .5X' 9'-'-C6 X\961j8X963.7 i . _ . - . - . . - . - . ° O ti I 06 1 1V Ito C co 1\ `�• .,o �/ INLET 1014 N �,� INLET 964.3 I I INLET I PROTECTION 1 PROTECTION I c9 P I `n I rn PROTECTION �� °° (NP) `� I __ ___ TYP. I 6�:- -___ moo- u u 00-°= -°�Oo O° On°,.0.°.O o -o o J 9r(TYP- aro 0 0 0 0 0�0�0 0,.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0, I I X I �•� °o°o°o°o°o�°,�,o°o�o„o_o_o_Onnn , I ' � O°b°n°n°n 00000000000000 OOOr,O„OnO,� O O O O O O _ O _ o n {, O . . �� MOW --_ 196 I I I IYY 960.9 I IX g6�3 Ix96�� 1.I LINE I 1 I \ I I I •� i i I " _ 11 -MOWI I I 1 II I _ X 961.7 //X961.0 X �0. \1'I�LINE I I I \� / \ -{y , N I ;�, BUILDING D I SILT FENCE_ 1 BUILDING C ._ ; �6rti�'I , 11 �� X 960.6 1 I X X 963.9 �1° C° 6 9 76 SF 6, 9 76 SF I „ ,a`rR I x 9�0. i `� 961 9 64.5 X I I 06 = I , I l I 962 i I I/ SILT FENCE, I 625°� INLET 11 I rn ; 11 e / PROTECTION 963.50 1 I 1 WOI. F -NCE FFE=963.50 - \II I I\I \ I ''III aI (TYP.) /\ �1nL• AE 00;; 6tiI nV 1 964 COfP109 -�� h ' QQW I oI I1 I ) ON 1_o7 LINE CF1 9 109 ' ,9 X 9F1 .0 A ry Q II I I J 963 ----- ----_ ---- 1X `__�-ti:rX95.619= --------- 96� 5 O I X 96 63.8 96 e ° I �0, I \\\I \ .+ 1 ' ---- - - - --- Ery ---9e CO Q 1 - o =--- 30 ---------------------- - ------ do �o--� ?ao - 9s, X �5 51 6� I1 ti° tip° - 06� 962 I 2a� x \ 959.4 �\� 19 X 963.8 62.3I q6 1 0 5o i �° i; -� �- \ I 9 I g62 ,- -- 6L :61-4- - INLET - .� INLET -� - aso ' 0 1 o PR TION INL NK FENCE CORNER + \- 6�' - 06�=---- A I • INLET �I_ PROTECTION 6ti° ; c FT. EAST OF LOT LINE 11 I PROTECTION \ (NP) �1 a 1� (TYP.) It I (TYP.) \ I I. .o 963.4X X 962.7 11-- / ��--- } --- ---- - -; 963 ------------ --- 1963 II --------------- I \ \ \ i; • III v 1 \ /I ISI 109 X 961.3 11 - Q;=� I I \ \ \ X 962.4 I °' 109 X / " I I \ CHAINLINK ---�^ 9'1'2 961.2 III X 961.8 / / I I / 11 �• I \ FENCE + \- ON LOT LINE. I to III / \, / ;'96I �� = o SILT FENCE rn X 960.5 06x11 I 1 / O - \O I � \ 0 BUILDING E ,- •o�L BUILDING F ;; o,6L' 96201 .I - I - \ \ I �` 9 76 SF CO 11 1' - \ X 958.6 SILT FENCE I I //I CO 6,976 SF 6, ; ; I 1 1 INLET I I 1 � / 1 PROTECTION D63.50 X x{60.4 1 • I FFE=963.50 (�,P) �° 1' 1 9�v 1 1 <, ; I 962 1 !61.� X 961.5 -� X 9 .9 JI Z/ SO k u v o 0 0 0 08080 'o"o"o� J I ° I u u u o 0 0 0 0 0'0' o 0x0„0„0„0o_o_o- 1 �\ I �� ., u 160-0- X962.6 uu0 0° °''o°o°o°o,_-0000I. v u u o 0 0 0 0 0 0'"'0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0_o_o_n n s •- o � 000°O 0 0 0 0 0 o..0_O_b_o n , I / I • ---6666-- -- II I s� _-_--_, ___________�______�_1 \ 7` roM 9 ; - --- - - - - -6666-- \ - \ o - - - ---+_ \ { \\ �6�` - , i'r/ 1 T _ I 1 x 958.7 � n1rl° 967) ;'. \ \ 9 O - 00 ` Q 0 6� 90 \ / 00 \ \ 1 I ✓�� \ �� ' � do INLET INLET ,-AT �1 0 _ PROTECTION INLET PROTECTION X 961.3 0 1 E 1 PROTECTION - ' rn I `� (TYP.) -6666-- ---------------°6 - , o (TYP.) �I 2. (TYP.)---------,- ---i'� :5-6666-- - 6666 --------- ° ° °to -°-o o�oJn opo 0,0,6"606060coco� h° I \ _ v 1o' 0-0-0"0"0"0"0"0"0"0 O O p,,,,0 „0„0,.0_01=0_o n r , 6• I u'O-0-0-0'0"0•'0"0"000 O'O < 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O,�O OnOr,O„O 0 0 0_80' n _ O' 000000000 0 0, 0 0 0 0 opo 0 0 0 o n °�I 6 s' X 959.9 ' 2 00 \\ I 11 : I�X961.0 1 1 X 961.3r14 0 I 16ry1y ,�F��°\ BUILDING H _ ,t II X 962.7 9 �� BUILDING G .� ry'' - �1 6ti� 6, 9 76 SF \I 6,976 SF x a6,h I - --\- ;; 9 i' ' < 962.3 CHAINLINK --� '*62.3 1:, INLET SILT FENCE PROTECTION 963.50 ' �' I I I FENCE + \- -14 FFE=963.50 (TYP.) 11I X 960.7 0.5 FT. WEST 109 i 0 1 OF LOT LINE. 1y 109 T ry I� �° i 1 I I; I - _ - \\ nl u = - -- '6666 -- �I 96ti N ° I SILT FENCE ��. (0 962.3111 I _ - �_ _ 4 963 =____-_ =_____-___-= _saw = -____ -C--=--6666-- - ��°i 1 (0 1 963 A s =- --- 6666-- '� - e 6 I i „ rn rn I s o a \ 9� l 1 \ IJ ( / 7 961.80i i X 9,� 1.1 X 960.6 961.80;96 ; L +9 °'� 951.7 n1 _=- 961,y '9e e?3 i I 06ti x ! 9s, /, o 9 5 ?ao ° X 962.4 6666 I X61. 962 es ' - ---6666-- s L ----o ----6666-- -------------6666-- 6666 �° 's � 962.6X �, �� . °61 I 666 6--------------------------- _--; 61h 61� -----6666-- - - 962.9X _ 6666-6666-- -Itt. 6666 962 - _-� �__ 66 66--6666-- .� " ------0' --6666-- .�---,--, .... - .. � -..-.�---------962�`��.-.��-- i .961 _ -\ - - - --961 -062.5 \ INLET 960 959 958 _ _ INLET LANDSCAPE INLET X .957 PROTECTION ,--EDGING/MULCH PROTECTION (TYP.) PROTECTION ,gyp , , I (TYP.) -- CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER + \- ,�� , _� I ✓VL.LX _ _ '96' _ X 961.8 \ `1 5.8 FT. EAST OF LOT LINE 967.2 X `s ; \ "' INLET - - I �' 62� / �9 \ PROTECTION _ / ` - -' \'�/� 0960' -- SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST (TYP) YaF9 7 raII 1 121 R 25 IMPERVIOUS AND DISTURBANCE AREAS EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA 2,822 SF = 0.06 ACRES PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA 150,032 SF = 3.44 ACRES >> 78.2% NET IMPERVIOUS AREA INCREASE 147,210 SF = 3.38 ACRES PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA 41,800 SF = 0.96 ACRES >> 21.8101. DISTURBANCE AREA 200,441 SF = 4.60 ACRES EROSION CONTROL QUANTITIES ITEM: QUANTITY UNIT ROCK ENTRANCE 1 EA SILT FENCE 1,602 LF INLET PROTECTION 22 EA BIOLOG 6" DIA 30 LF SWPP NARRATIVE This project construction will consist of site clearing, grading, utilities, building, parking lot, drive aisles, and truck court. First, perimeter silt fence and inlet protection shall be installed. Then site work shall commence. The contractor shall dispose all debris off-site within 24 hours. Then the site can be graded, utilities installed, building constructed, curbing and pavements installed, final grade tollerance, and landscape final stabilization. Once final grade is established and certified, the site shall be stabilized with seed and mulch or sod. Once vegetation is established, temporary erosion control measures shall be removed. RUNOFF ROUTING OFFSITE Downstream water bodies receiving storm water runoff from the project site: Select roof drainage is directed to adjacent wetland adjacent to the south property boundary Site pavement and pervious areas are directed to City storm sewer that drains to City regional NURP pond (Karlsburger Pond) approximately 500 ft to the north Otter Creek approximately 1,100 ft to the north Mississippi River approximately 4,750 ft to the east POLLUTION PREVENTION NOTES Solid waste: collected sediment, asphalt and concrete millings, floating debris, paper, plastic, fabric, construction debris and other wastes must be disposed of properly off-site and must comply with MPCA requirements. Hazardous materials: oils, gasoline, paint, and any hazardous substance must be properly stored, including secondary containment, to prevent spills, leaks or other discharge. Restricted access to storage areas must be provided to prevent vandalism. Storage and disposal must be in compliance with MPCA regulations. External washing of trucks or other construction vehicles is not allowed on site. No engine degreasing is allowed on site. Concrete truck washout is not to be allowed on site unless washout waste is contained with no discharge to ground surface or site drainage facilities. Containment systems are to be located a minimum 50 feet away from drainage facilities and watercourses. Containment systems shall have an impermeable liner. Containment system shall be clearly marked with signage. All sanitary waste must be collected from portable toilet units on site by a licensed waste management contractor. The units must be secured and shall be maintained on a regular basis as needed to prevent overfilling. n' 0 30 60 90 r � GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET SURVEY DATA SURVEY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY: MEYER ROHLIN LAND SERVICES 708 1st AVENUE NE BUFFALO, MN 55313 DATED: APRIL 18, 2017 BENCHMARK: MN/DOT GEODETIC MONUMENT "8605 S" ELEVATION = 966.55 NAVD88 DATUM PROJECT LOCATION PART OF THE SW4 AND NE4, SECTION 14 TOWNSHIP 121, RANGE 25, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA. EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 2, BLOCK 3, OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA. EROSION CONTROL NOTES 1. All devices necessary to control erosion and sediment (I.E. perimeter silt fence, rock construction entrances, swales, ponds, berms, ETC.) shall be installed prior to any other construction operations. 2. After completion of final grading, exposed soils must be permanently stabilized within 7 days. Stabilization shall consist of disc -anchored seed & mulch, HECP with fiber reinforced matrix, erosion blanket with seed, or sod. 3. The site must be kept in a well drained condition at all times. The contractor shall be responsible for temporary ditches, or other means necessary to ensure proper drainage. The building pad must be provided with a positive outflow. This work shall be incidental to the grading contract. 4. Entering/exiting of the site shall occur only at rock construction entrance to reduce tracking of dirt onto paved streets. Sediment tracked onto streets during working hours must be reclaimed via street scraping and sweeping at the end of each working day. 5. Stormwater discharge pipe outlet energy dissipation shall be provided by rip -rap with size, quantity, and placement in accordance with City standards. Rip -rap installation shall be within 24 hours of pipe installation. 6. Install silt fence around all temporary inactive stockpiles which are not place within existing silt fence area or other perimeter erosion controls. 7. Stabilization of temporary or permanent drainage ditches that drain water from the construction site must be initiated within 24 hours of connecting the drainage ditch to any storm water conveyance system and must be completed using erosion blanket. 8. Sufficient personell, equipment, and materials shall be mobilized within 24 hours of written order (ie. email) by the owner or owners representative to conduct corrective work and install temporary erosion control work in the case of an emergency. EROSION CONTROL INSTALLATION SCHEDULE 1. Silt fence shall be installed or restored prior to any construction. Silt fence shall be located as shown to intercept runoff. The area located beyond the perimeter silt fence shall not be disturbed during construction. 2. Rock Construction Entrance shall be installed prior to grading operations. 3. All storm sewer inlets shall have inlet protection inserts installed. Inserts shall be "Road rain -Top Slab" or "Road Drain -Curb & Gutter" inlet protection devices as manufactured by WIMCO (or approved equal) and installed per manufacture's recommendations. 4. All erosion control installations shall remain in place and be maintained in good condition by the contractor until the site has been re -vegetated, at which time it shall be removed by the contractor. For proposed paved surface areas, the contractor may remove necessary silt fencing to construct roadway, while maintaining adequate erosion control in adjacent areas. 5. Sufficient topsoil shall be stockpiled to allow for the replacement of 4" topsoil for disturbed areas to be re -vegetated. 6. The contractor shall schedule site grading, utility installation and roadway construction so that the general site can be mulched and re -seeded soon after disturbance. Areas that will not be subject to construction traffic shall be seed and mulched or sodded within 72 hours of final grading. EROSION CONTROL MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE 1. Erosion control measures shall be inspected by the contractor's representative and maintained by the contractor every Friday and within 24 hours after any rainfall event larger than 112" until the project is completed. Maintenance requirements are as follows: silt fence - 1/3 height of fence or damaged, remove sediment and/or repair fence within 24 hours; rock entrance - refresh as necessary to conform to detail; inlet protection inserts - remove sediment after each rain event, clean or replace filter when clogged; surface water - drain and stabilize, within 7 days of discovery; and street sweeping - remove all sediment tracked onto paved surfaces within 24 hours or as directed by City Engineer. 2. Replacement - Fabric shall be replaced promptly when it decomposes or becomes ineffective before the barrier is no longer necessary. 3. Any sediment remaining in place after silt fence is no longer required shall be dressed to conform with the existing grade, prepared, and seeded with appropriate seed mix, as directed by the engineer. 4. Removal of the silt fence- Silt fences shall be removed when they have served their useful purpose, but not before the upward sloping area has beenermanentl stabilized. P Y VEGITATION GROUND COVER SCHEDULE 1. Stabilization of all exposed soil areas must be initiated immediately but in no case completed later than seven (7) days after the construction activity in that portion of the site has temporarily or permanently ceased. 2. Permanent turf ground cover shall include all disturbed areas be covered with a minimum 4" topsoil and sodded or seeded as allowed by City, or as proposed on City approved landscape plan for the project. 3. Temporary ground cover shall be MnDOT seed mix 150 shall be applied at 100 lbs/ac, or equivalent as approved by City. MnDOT Type 1 mulch shall be applied at 2 tons/ac and disc anchored in areas not covered by sod or erosion blanket. 4. Fertilizer shall be MnDOT Type 1 10-10-20 and applied at 200 lbs/ac. Disc fertilizer into top 3" of soil. Specification reference is MnDOT 2575. 5. Dormant seed mix shall be used after November 1 or when temperatures do not exceed 40° F, using some rates specified above. No seed shall be placed on snow or ice greater than 2" in depth. 6. Any seeded areas that do not become established with vegetation shall be reseeded at Contractor's expense. 7. Erosion blanket shall be installed in seed areas with ground surface slopes of 4H:1V or steeper. RESPONSIBLE PARTY Contact information for the responsible party for erosion control is: TO BE DETERMINED CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER +\- eJ iTr _�` 558 57 ' `_ \` 95c.958 - \ I 1/4 OF SECTION 14, T. , 0.4 FT. WEST OF LOT CORNER - Il - - �. 959 __ .960 9n� - N 89°14 00 E N 89°14'00" E 'T \ 960 x �bJ.4 --6666-- 961 ------------- --X--- I ----- ------ �< _----- 961 --- - -- _-_ _� _--- _y_.--_,> _ 962. 962 - ", ------ ---- --- i 1899 53 J, -6666-- --- - - - _ _ 6666-- - ------3123.566666- 964.2'�� 963962\ C �� i\� i4uu t y _._ o ,I ----------------------- �<- _ ___ ------------------mss"_ -rte O^ "' / �--� 961.3 - - 963.7 o �o,o a,,96�= - - 1 / 1 �Poa000 /`S� ` ---MOW-, o� aoS o oo_Q R\�___-- -----961- i� o _vim 66' - �°�°�� - \�TC 958.96 - �_ `SILT FENCE - - _ ��''-SHED 962--- ; _- �-INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS. - - LINE -e -960.\\�� Y-----------6666-_ �� I _-� x961.6g61 I X _ I 960 h�960.2 ��.r �\\9S hw `\�� CURB 960.5XI ' -TEL LANDSCAPE CO PROJECT LOCATION PLAN �Go, X 9� �X� 1 �\ STOP RISER EDGING/MULCH C2 GIRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN LANDSCAPE- GOLDEN EAGLE ROAD �,� '-��CE3 _ _ _ _ _ �h EDGING/ROCK °' �LEV.=958.16_ - _--SOUTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL - - - - _ - 8I SHRUBS \ � PARK (DOC.# 275353) AS MONUMENTED; ALSO C3 SANITARY AND WATER UTILITY PLAN SAN MH X I NORTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF KLEIN FARMS I I I C4 STORM SEWER UTILITY PLAN ELEV.=958.59--. 958.7 I ESTATES 2ND ADDITION (DOC.# 753470) I I I C5 LANDSCAPE PLAN ------ -------I� \ � I I I I I I C6 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C7 EXISTING CONDITIONS AND REMOVALS PLAN Ga I I I I I I I C8 DETAILS I I / JI F__I n I I F__n F__)A ,h �` Fr_ (` _T_A I � � �` �h� � � N I I� � A I� I-`► I _T_I /� N I I ► I I C9 PHASING PLAN MI ■ L U CU LU O CC CU 0 ca W Z W a:O Q. FILE N0. 00633 Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan 00 0 o ti O m Q O p v V FILE N0. 00633 Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan 0 00 I I �� ROAD h DUNDAS - I �. x0 �) 10 D.I.P.10 01 00 AN MH _� �� 9 ��; o h END OF I 960 RIM RIM ELEV.=960.04 I 1' o _ c6 0 _ 6' �, p�' CULVERT I SAN MH h1 �g6 c I = N G �,`° BURIED 960.0 �i 959.90 INV.- ELF .=942.8 RIM ELEV.=961.96 �� 961.11 �' SILT FENCE •0.66 cpl'� C° -' '< P -° ,)( ' - - ��- )< - 959.79 INV. ELEV.=943.7 °� _ �\ �r 1 �� - _959- - � - - - - -f - SILT FENCE CI __ _ -� o I i X 95,.,, I -�-- _L -960- c- �_ --96 -- 959.2X X 5) _ 959.3 -_T--T - cv+- ,(� 959.7. 111:5i -T T T + --_TT�4 RISER 960.6 X- /J�%C-o;-T --rr-_V T T T T _S-g�jg�TI T T-"T.F960�- JJ i7 fes ------ --- �----_yb"1-------------�i`,�`L� ---0-961-------- �-� - - -o - -962- - - - 961.9 �`° - X ---- X ----- X 961.5 962.1-�4---- -_- - - - - X 962.9 ---------- - r�----------- 962.5 �. 962.4 24" CMP '"UTILITY CULVERT ,% x-963__ EASEMENT _ EXISTING -- > ,�- DRI VEWAY X 963.0 962.8X Q 4\ X 962.9 ACCESS TO X 962.5 X' o I 1962.9 \'---MOW REMOVE EXI STI NG - PUBLIC STREET 962'3 LINE CULVERT m II o' = I Q � I SILT FENCE X962.2 SILT FENCE _--� � I \I X 963.5 o X962.2 _----------� t \ \ w X 961.9 X61.9 1 �\ � Y 962.5 �962 Oro 1\ I\ \ 963.1 X) 1 o f \ ` X 964.2 X 96' \ I- -� X 961.3 \I \ X 961.9 �0�� 962.0 N \ M 0 W \\ _ --LINE 1 c \\ I m 963.7 X96 .5 X / X\961j8X 963.7 \ \ 964.3 I I to 1 P I rn 1 X 961.2 X >1 962.5 1 X 961.7 MOW --_ I \\ I 960.9 I g63\�g6Q J LINE I iMOW I I I 1 0 0 I I nc, 7 X961 0 X 961.0 EXISTING VEGITATION ,' LINE I ► I x'962.0TO BE REMOVED �� 96 g 0.6T 1 1, 67) � X 963.9 964.5 X I 1 �� . I/1 X 960.1 i X 96,E SILT FENCEI .---WOOD FENCE w I II 964.4 ' CORNER + \- / o' I 0 ^962.5 ON LOT LINE X 961.7 I 0 1 I I \ X961.5 ( o X 960.4 I I �� 1 1 \ \ w 11 �\ \\ �J11 X 960.7 960.5- 0 I X95.611 \I IIX 0 X 963.8 Qo I I / \ ` 1 FO• I \ \ �," X 5.51 I 6� X 962.3 \ 1 X959.4 ��- I X 963.8 ra 961.4 % 961.4 I --,CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER + - I I 0 0 -_ � \ I a I 5.1 FT. EAST OF LOT LINE I I CONCRETE I 59.0 X I SURFACE I 0 I\ \ \ \ 963.4X 1/X 962.7, I (APPROX.) I I I\\ \ \ \ ° ° ° .961 3 960.9 I II \\ \ \ \X 962.4 CHAINLINK ---�^ 962.5 ) X 961.8 961.2 / I I I \ FENCE + \-�� ON LOT LINE. / SILT FENCE m X 960.5 \ 960.91 \ 0 REMOVE CONCRETE X\ I SILT FENCE �,- // PAVEMENT \ 0 1 1\1 1 I 0 / 1 X 160.41coo I _ X 961.8 X 961.5 X 960.9 --� - 5.1 t \- u I � - X 962.6 �� 1 �\ I 1� \\ 960.8 �' \ \ -961-- 0 1 \ EXISTING FENCE ON EXISTING FENCE ON \ � � � � \ � �' I ,.. \ ADJACENT PROPERTIES i i ADJACENT PROPERTIES - - �� \9s2, \ \ I \I TO REMAIN TO REMAIN \ � - (0 961.4 X X 961.3 0 9 I .4 � O 962.5 X 962.5 CONCRETE a 0 \\ \ ��Q \ SURFACE X 959.9 (APPROX.) I�X961.0 � \ 961.3 \ 0 I \ a I \ X 962.7 1 I 0 I 5.2 +\- X 962.3 1\ X 961.3 --� � I CHAINLINK X 962.3 BROKEN \ a 0 SILT FENCE FENCE +\- CONCRETE REMOVE CONCRETE II X 960.7 0.5 FT. WEST PIECE° 0 1 OF LOT LINE. PAVEMENT � I I SILT FENCE �\\ 961.5 0 1 REMOVE GARDEN PLOTS AND X 61. - yn 1 1 X 960.6 / SHRUBS/TREES I 0 -. 962.5 X 96 .4 I /-MOW 1 I :-�- +.� LINE j 962.6X CONCRETE I + + + + 0 962.9 SURFACE I i ;`+ +++++++ �--- - I X+++++++.++++ -- I (APPROX.) I i1+++++++� +++� `��++++++'I.', 2.6 r -MOW i ; + + + c. + , , + + + +, 0 LANDSCAPE �I \ �i� _ ;� a _ ►° �,_ �962. i LINE i »+;++'�++++{`++c�'�'OF �;+ --EDGING/MULCH }+ + ��++++ +� - ++++ N +\ ; 6\ CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER + i% 6ti BROKEN MOW ��' ` �� \ 1+++++++. ++ ;+++++++I+a.,9--- 9\- ,� o, 62.2X- 4++++ ,+++++;W1 X CONCRETE LINE - -9 +C+961.8 _t 5.8 FT. EAST OF LOT LINE 967.2 `,\\ PIECE / ,-1----= 62��;:+ ++% E A �9 I -A \o M 0 W ESD-_ �'A R E A -- � ' A R '�� 96�' ---SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST 1\i ----------------------- ,-T-r---- ---------,--�C 962.3 CD 1 I -963- i-+-++-+-++++++++++......+++++++++++ p I 1/4 OF SECTION 14, T. 121, R. 25 CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER +\- } +++++++++++++ + + + + + + + + + + + + ++- + + + + + + + + + + E 0.4 FT. WEST OF LOT CORNER--. II ^��° UTILITY- ++++++++++++++++++++++++GARDEN+++�+�+++++++++++++f M 0 W \� I �- N 89°14'00" E �`° EASEMENTi++++++++++++++++++++++++++ + + + +++++++++++/++++++ + + + . 961.8 N 89°14 00 E X------- -- �- j - _ + + + + +X6 + +_++ f ----------------------X--- ------ 1B99.53----- + -------- 62 --�,` - -- 0 C ;++++++ + 299.81 N 89°14'00" E+}++++++" 962.6 �o_,----------- - ---- i - 1899 964.2X ,\ = `- _ o==-±;-- - �� 962.5 - �0::=_, ---------------- -------------------_-� --- .. / �� 961.3 _ �_ ------ 963.7 oo a¢6�- �p0y _ - - - - - - - - 00000 -st- 961-�`e' SHED \962--- -' -- `? -"66 - - - - = SILT FENCE \E -- )r - -LINE " �7r - - \\�`I` TCC 8.96 - �' _ - - - - _ _ ; X 961._696 1 b V - - -� �r - ,= y P� _ _ _ - = '� �� 1 --- --�_--X960.2 ��.. S X I I, - - 960 Goho' X \9,5 �``� STOP 960.5 I --TEL. LANDSCAPE __X X \ ; RISER EDGING/MULCH LANDSCAPE- GOLDEN EAGLE ROA h�� 'r�CB ', �h EDGING ROCK °' �LEV.=958 16_ _ ---_SOUTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL - - - / PARK (DOC.# 275353) AS MONUMENTED; ALSO & SHRUBS EXISTING TREES AT TOP SAN MH X 1 I NORTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF KLEIN FARMS OF BERM ON ADJACENT _ - - - _ ELEV�958.59 -- . 958.7 I ESTATES 2ND ADDITION (DOC.# 753470) PROPERTIES TO REMAIN I �, ctt I �� A I S F__ r- N I I S A n hI I S I Report -Engineering Properties (MN) Map unit symbol and Pct. of Hydrolo Depth soil name map gic unit group 406 -Dorset sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes Dorset 80 B In 0 30 60 90 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET SURVEY DATA SURVEY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY: MEYER ROHLIN LAND SERVICES 708 1st AVENUE NE BUFFALO, MN 55313 DATED: APRIL 18, 2017 BENCHMARK: MN/DOT GEODETIC MONUMENT "8605 S" ELEVATION = 966.55 NAVD88 DATUM PROJECT LOCATION PART OF THE SW4 AND NE4, SECTION 14 TOWNSHIP 121, RANGE 25, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA. EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 2, BLOCK 3, OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA. DEMOLITION NOTES 1. Install perimeter sediment controls as soon as possible during clear and grub operations. See Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan. 2. Provide air quality control measures at the request of the Engineer or City Representatives. Take necessary measures to keep dust levels to a minimum. Provide sweeping of adjacent paving as needed, or as required by the City Engineer. 3. Locate and protect all utility lines prior to and during demolition. Utility locations shown are based on best available information and are not guaranteed. Contact private utility service for disconnection and removal. 4. Remove or relocate all existing site features that interfere with the proposed construction. 5. Protect existing site features that are to remain during construction. Replace anything damaged with new construction. 6. Pavement shall be saw cut at limits of removal unless noted otherwise. Do not impede existing traffic circulation to adjacent businesses or streets. 7. Sufficient topsoil shall be stockpiled to allow for the replacement of 6" of topsoil in disturbed areas to be re-vegitated. 8. All construction and post -construction parking shall be on-site. At no time shall parking, loading, or unloading be allowed on public streets. 9. Storage of materials or equipment shall not be allowed within public Right -of -Way and shall be maintained on site within project boundaries. Engineering Properties (MN) -Wright County, Minnesota USDA texture Classification Fragments Unified AASHTO >10 3-10 inches inches I Pct Pct 0-11 Sandy loam, fine SC -SM, sandy loam, loam Sc 11-20 Loam, sandy loam, SC -SM coarse sandy loam W 'N 20-38 Gravelly coarse SW -SM sand, gravelly 0 sand, very gravelly coarse CC sand, gravelly Q) loamy sand a 38-79 Gravelly coarse SW -SM sand, gravelly rfta sand, very gravelly coarse Z W sand, gravelly Z loamy sand Data Source Information A-2, A-4 Percentage passing sieve number- Liquid Plasticit limit y index 4 10 40 200 Pct 90-100 78-100 57-88 27-50 0-31 NP -10 A-6, 0 0 91-100 79-100 54-83 24-45 0-31 NP -11 A-2-4, A-4 A -1-b, A-1 0 0-2 79-92 54-77 24-41 5-15 0-0 NP A -1-b, A-1 0 0-2 80-93 56-78 24-42 5-15 0-0 NP 0�4 �m L CU U CL W 'N 0 "Noft CC 10 Q) a to .coNo" Lft rfta 0 '~ Co Z W Z W C w NOR" O 0 Q. Q �V �1•+ � r O UJ 0M0 = 2 0 00 0 N11 o m W W INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: o CO PROJECT LOCATION PLAN FILE NO. 00633 C1 SITE PLAN C2 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN - -� - - - - - - C3 SANITARY AND WATER UTILITY PLAN C4 STORM SEWER UTILITY PLAN C5 LANDSCAPE PLAN C6 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C7 EXISTING CONDITIONS AND REMOVALS PLAN C 7 C8 DETAILS C9 PHASING PLAN Existing Conditions and Removals Plan CHIMNEY 5FN.5 I.1NrE1MCAL OR •EYR1wkr rBETEx OR AwRa1Ly Eaara ST.MYN 11wwI.E FRAME ANo COVER LAOa,eID L1EI.IEpN FTPE ARp L sumC1 swt er A. ROM-SHRuxwO LA41T wa MAwHaLE6 � � _�� ANWa Dw aA} Wr CIA W1 .• - NW t�• e r 11RRNT.E SF.C,p1N ro BE Am c-A7a d.ss x Fil - IA�F[SS "A •y - .r aw- uSE 1I-2 GOTTA FOR AM wAA10LE JOFn^ OCKWVTON sK waD i COHKCTCH PIE i0 Nu]elalE " weuR,c µ01C N' ® - - � -a• 1w PAEGSi eorrcM seararN � =;! s,' - ` •%� �'� ,ITR 1Y•ERr - -- e5 AT 12' OC VCH WAY STANDARD MANHOLE FOR SANITARY SEWER NOTES,1a nRc 0 Mw10LE SRPS SNML 6[ Garr HLBN N MA INOOB PS -F -or r p ' �; .I LKeA•orulan TD Au oslw REmAATora ® F DROP a GIMATER THAN N• F101P. M pyTSCE DROP. Title: Standard Plate Library Manhole City of Monticello Data: 03-05 Plate No. Standard Sanitary Revrsed:03-15 3001 POINT ]ANiry LYY 9TAKT w YOPa F IPM J 5• TO ]' Ol AST ROLL EIELOSEO IH PL T[C DR FXvNIER WITI% TYPE 2r STOROLL DITCH CHECK DISE aF RDx+. rFKED AREAS K 2' x ,e- tONO 1KIORM 5tN AT 1 �7 SPACPIC W IWy. STMH S aE PaE�.FsT 1504ryE ANANIOE xcTIDFa ORnEN TNROOaq THE BACK war M THE a'aDRaa AT AM ANGLE NX .s oEulEcs N.n1 concentroted, place sod stips YHr NOP a na srrrc rEMOEM E[wGAL . a P,- PROtyE e• TO O- Di F'MBEfAFENT OE W wwglc N,. FL ax 0. PV-;fl[1E AND Although pegging of sod is not specifically required it is understood that the �I• LI' E1IEa1FNT [CPTH B30ROLL STAKING OET41L r CAST -DI -PLACE y TRIe: NINIMM OP 2' NOTE - City Of Monticello WHEN 1KGK THAN I (BRICK OR &ALK] N. -OWED ONLY IFAPPROVED 8'1 CNCIREER BIORDLVCOpOST LOD IS ` NEEDED, DVERLAP ENDS A AND PIPE CONNECTION MNNIKM OF 6° AND STAKE g E' A'- e• r l Title: Bio Lag Staking St Godard Plate Library Straw or Wood Sia Roll City of Monticello I DIAMETER REQUIRM_ Dote: o3 -Q8 Plate No. MWHDLE STEPS 5HHJ. BE CAST IRON OR MA MODEL PS Revised: 6009 (BY MA INDUSTRIAL INC.) CONFORMING TO ALL OSHA REQU1LATNDHS 03-15 W WV WI' 1G11'1G 1G1G11A VWVV GRASS TURF SEEDING AS APPROPRIATE FOR BASIN FOR COMPLETE TYPE A" QW gfUlON MA DUE SER UMNED AAM Mr. w- R"NOR" n R IIf'RID). 4BOM, F4 PVF: SOPPORr >8 RFAaRED, Title: Outside Drop Section Far ndarPlate Library Sanitary Manhole City of Monticello polo: Plata No. 03-04 I A�d _� Wee&03-15 3002 Where the flow of water is sheeting, place sad strips perpendicular Lo the direction of water flow. SHINGLING SOD OF PaE�.FsT 1504ryE ANANIOE xcTIDFa uuc"" Rp. TEE concentroted, place sod stips OK L9C,H p'� bP w LYu !Y or Ra porotlel to the direction of OVERLAPPING SOD W wwglc NOTE: 0. PV-;fl[1E AND Although pegging of sod is not specifically required it is understood that the - ; IMT AN4 SIX5 repair ar replacement of sod which becomes displaced or damaged due to lack of b r CAST -DI -PLACE y TRIe: "MARIE RHEA Sod Placement City Of Monticello Title: Outside Drop Section Far ndarPlate Library Sanitary Manhole City of Monticello polo: Plata No. 03-04 I A�d _� Wee&03-15 3002 Where the flow of water is sheeting, place sad strips perpendicular Lo the direction of water flow. SHINGLING SOD OF s 3:1 MAX-� SIDE SLOPE WIDTH VARIES Where the flow of water is v concentroted, place sod stips STANDARD FP.wE & COYER,. porotlel to the direction of OVERLAPPING SOD water [law. NOTE: TYPE 3 Although pegging of sod is not specifically required it is understood that the contractor well be responsible for the successful establishment a[ the sod including repair ar replacement of sod which becomes displaced or damaged due to lack of protection or proper care- r CAST -DI -PLACE ASTM C 478 CONCRETE RPE. SEE WDOT STANDARD PLATE SDW (wD TONGUE OR GROOVE AT TOP TRIe: Standard Plate Library Sod Placement City Of Monticello Date:03-07 Plate No. (BRICK OR &ALK] N. -OWED ONLY IFAPPROVED 8'1 CNCIREER 66 ` ReYieed=03-15 6010 s 3:1 MAX-� SIDE SLOPE WIDTH VARIES II ` I I I II I I I I II I II I I II UNDISTURBED AND/OR J UNCOMPACTED INSITU SOIL >_s 3:1 MAX SIDE SLOPE C C4511% ADJUST NO RINGS v 41 ON - 12• MAX STANDARD FP.wE & COYER,. STRAW to MULCH rw DEn,As TYPE 3 r J FOR CER RIUIRFM II ` I I I II I I I I II I II I I II UNDISTURBED AND/OR J UNCOMPACTED INSITU SOIL >_s 3:1 MAX SIDE SLOPE C C4511% ADJUST NO RINGS OVERFLOW M 31 OF 41 ON - 12• MAX STANDARD FP.wE & COYER,. e• &MMN SEE RLATI 10011 T ROADWAY SURFACE rw DEn,As SEE MDOSTANDARD PLATE 4020 11=III=III=1 J FOR CER RIUIRFM '-•: �:•.:: •. :: ,.:-,.MALL CONSTRUC•TON SILaI BE CLASS II -RECO PIPE, Exerm 48- DN MAY BE r CAST -DI -PLACE ASTM C 478 CONCRETE RPE. SEE WDOT STANDARD PLATE SDW (wD TONGUE OR GROOVE AT TOP COMOREIE - OR 60TTCW OF TRK °ACTION]- CAST -IN-PLACE S �• �' t0 10' CONCRETE r1R MASON, CONSTR%CTD N OVERFLOW A' TOP OF FETER ASSEMBLY (BRICK OR &ALK] N. -OWED ONLY IFAPPROVED 8'1 CNCIREER 66 CONCRETE f]OGHQUISE REgIRFIED ON 1UT511E AND INSIDE OF STRUCTURE 3" GALVANIZED STEEL POLE AND PIPE CONNECTION ,n 'I � STRITCiuRE, g E' A'- e• B' POURED CONCRETE BASE. FOR ALTERAATE PRECAST CONCRETE BASE. 59E MnDOT STANDARD PLATE 4011 (MODIFY CU METER Mo 2• RAAEO AREA TO FIT REOURED DIAWETER _- �Ua O1 REFER TO STANDARD PLANS FOR HENT AND I DIAMETER REQUIRM_ PFORARI ruFO WH MWHDLE STEPS 5HHJ. BE CAST IRON OR MA MODEL PS -I -PF (BY MA INDUSTRIAL INC.) CONFORMING TO ALL OSHA REQU1LATNDHS Mo SPACED 18' W. MIR pROTECFNE XAnIG As wWLFACnIREO NO' ADAPTOR IAO. ® MINIMUM STEEL REINFORCEMENT " fl EOIJUALENT STEEL AREA IN WIRE MESH MAY BE USED LIFNKaLE� RLA$IEIgD OR CATCH ExIER" (� GENERAL OIHENSIONS FOR CONCRETE. APPLY TO BRIG[ AND CONCRETE MASONRY UWT BASION DIA CONSTRUCTION ALSO, EXCEPT As NOTED. SEWER BECK (MrZOT SPEC 35161 OLOC% 12 MWIAIUW FOR PRECAST, S BRICKS OR MRSORRr CONSTRUCTION T BLOCK wimmuM FOR MASONRY CONSTUCTION 1 �lI ` WTE YyyE TEE � (T REo6OACEMENT AS PER MIDOT SPEC 3301, GRADE 60. FR01x 1E xmw T Nm rill: Standard Manhole for landard Plate Library AL Storm Server City of Monticello Date: Plate No, 03-Q5 Pcws rRDu rkLc r o TWAANO 4001 R xYlsad: 03-15 11Pa. ■ 40 9 s ■ ■ ■■ ■40 a .7- m .. r1TAPrEF y'p kids_ 1 o _ �� rI,l.wpu:fl•1xn �imm�rnla roun�lld(b ill/sfF�EaIL�.muante He��m,e� �AT� Erasion Control Blanket Standard Plate Library Stapling Patterns & Installation City of Monticello Data:43-Q8 Plate No. Revteea:03_15 6011 t ELV = VARIES TOP BASIN ELV = 959.00 I BOTTOM BASIN ELV = 957.00 IIII III ISI � 1' DEPTH AMMENDED SOIL MEDIUM; SEE GENERAL NOTES ITEM 7. TYPICAL INFILTRATION BASIN CROSS-SECTION NOT TO SCALE INFILTRATION BASIN GENERAL NOTES: 1) INSTALL ALL TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES (IN ACCORDANCE WITH MnDOT GENERAL CONDITIONS 2573) PRIOR TO THE START OF ANY CONSTRUCTION OPERATION THAT MAY CAUSE ANY SEDIMENTATION OR SILTATION AT THE SITE. 2) INSTALL STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION TO PREVENT CLOGGING OF THE STORM SEWER AND SEDIMENT LOADS TO DOWNSTREAM STORM WATER FACILITIES OR WATERBODIES. 3) IF THE STORM WATER BMP IS BEING DESIGNED TO SERVE AS A TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN, GRADE THE BMP TO WITHIN 12" ABOVE THE FINAL GRADE TO PROTECT THE UNDERLYING MATERIAL FROM CLOGGING. ONCE CONSTRUCTION IN THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND THE SITE ISSTABILIZED, EXCAVATE THE INFILTRATION BASIN TO FINAL GRADE AND COMPLETE CONSTRUCTION OF THE INFILTRATION BASIN. 4) GRADING OF THE INFILTRATION BASIN SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED USING LOW -IMPACT EARTH MOVING EQUIPMENT TO PREVENT COMPACTION OF THE UNDERLYING SOILS. SMALL TRACKED DOZERS AND BOBCATS WITH RUNNER TRACKS ARE RECOMMENDED. 5) EXCAVATE THE INFILTRATION BASIN TO THE SPECIFIED DEPTH (ELEVATION). ALL SUB MATERIAL BELOW THE SPECIFIED ELEVATION SHALL BE LEFT UNDISTURBED, UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. 6) IN THE EVENT THAT SEDIMENT IS INTRODUCED INTO THE BMP DURING OR IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING EXCAVATION, THIS MATERIAL WILL NEED TO BE REMOVED FROM THE INFILTRATION BASIN PRIOR TO INITIATING THE NEXT STEP IN THE INFILTRATION BASIN CONSTRUCTION PROCESS. THIS IS ESPECIALLY IMPORTANT IF THE INFILTRATION BASIN HAS BEEN DESIGNED TO INFILTRATE STORM WATER: SEDIMENT THAT HAS BEEN WASHED INTO THE INFILTRATION BASIN DURING THE EXCAVATION PROCESS CAN SEAL THE PERMEABLE MATERIAL, SIGNIFICANTLY REDUCING THE INFILTRATION CAPACITY OF THE SOILS. 7) INFILTRATION BASINS SHALL BE OVER -EXCAVATED TO SPECIFIED DEPTH AND FILLED WITH A WELL BLENDED MIXTURE OF 70%-80% SEMI -COURSE WASHED SAND; 20%-30% MnDOT GRADE 2 COMPOST. ALTERNATE OPTION IS TO IMPORT 3 INCH DEPTH MnDOT GRADE 2 COMPOST AND ROTO -TILL INTO TOP 9 INCH DEPTH NATIVE SOIL PROVIDED NATIVE SOIL IS CONFIRMED TO BE CLEAN SAND MEETING MnDOT SELECT GRANULAR SPECIFICATION AND ALL NON-NATIVE SOILS ARE REMOVED. 8) INFILTRATION BASIN TO BE SEEDED WITH MNDOT SEED MIX 34-181 OR APPROVED EQUAL. SEEDING SHALL CONFORM TO MnDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION, PLANTING SPECIFICATION 3876, 2005 EDITION. 9) PORTIONS OF INFILTRATION BASINS TO BE SEEDED SHALL BE MULCHED WITH CLEAN GRAIN STRAW (MnDOT TYPE 3) AT A RATE OF 2 TONS PER ACRE. 10) SEEDING AND INSTALLATION OF ANY EROSION CONTROL BLANKET NECESSARY SHALL BE COMPLETED WITHIN SEVEN DAYS (7) DAYS OF FINAL GRADING. f e 0- L__J o Sf C '•LL L_ r C, p b J�"•}jS� F g 4 _ .CC• N F. w E.1iL 51 2 C' n R g w A o g a A�A Ca - a a a ap TOe: Standard Plate Library Riprap Detail City or Monticello_Date = 03-05 Plate NO. 1= - 4009 Revise EnSnNc culls CONCRETE ar1M.w °�l,c[ OVERFLOW M 31 OF T e-. a' . s' n1p •AA � ifss MVe 6' ]l``VI�CI��l (�1L- WE CURB SOk HEIGHT e• &MMN SEE RLATI 10011 F16tt rw DEn,As wNMCO ROAD DRIIR LO -23• HIGH FLOW 11=III=III=1 INLET PROTECTION CURD AND GUTTER MODEL DEFLECTOR PLATE OR Cm APPROVED Ea11AL I CONFORM TO MNDOT SPEC. 2461 MENTION 151'• PF EunARE . °� °N SOI 1PE THE CURB 80 EIGHT FRAC eMry 1f1C [rraAED NFUGEl F1M�m cxRx, T, �1 OVERFLOW A' TOP OF FETER ASSEMBLY FILTER A111MOLY DIAMETER, ID• Al LOW PONT HUH -FLOW FAMIC • FOR THE NEW 9 -3290 -VB STANDARD CASTING. IN51ALL WMCA ROAD DRAIN CG -3290 OR CTTY APPROVED EWAL. Title: Inlet Protection Standard Plate Library Catch Basin Insert City of Monticello Data:03 Q7 Plate No, Revl9ed: 6004 03-15 i A A N 1,14 4Y oam RIET n%AgE o d _ i WEIPW HO. R-]OT4cure em s -V - PLAN - r ca.7m Eou.R ANL 510RM 0-0 a SHOW OM THE MAA DLTR+EssEo N1 eE 1 IEVAIKXI CSFE DErNI ADauSTRNG RNOS EHGEE w 2LC.FCNYI3RT[ aMa "Troll ew.ae _ _ N-•� Ya' FINISH N9EIDE 4• COMOrETC MMR Nwl�i, SECTION A -A WR A O' TO a CONCRETE COM.AR a's"' Tore" IHC LASTRG TO Allo PR[C Sr SECTKw us H 4I Le[AHREEHw vOmYEIATS SHARD fZ TWE A1ryOT fRscH H. TIE Swe-Af. Title: `� Standard Plate Library Standard Catch Basin City of Monticello Date: 03-05 Plots No. Revlsld: 4002 fl3-15 0ro,*1 pods] MNDOT Closs CA -T5 or CA -25 Riprap Bedding Geoteklie fabric iginal grade g SECSECRBI iJ SON B-8 {not to stole] Ribbed or Corrugated steel plates "'��rrr mss JJ •d ii7M�J original GeateKile faprio SSEC710 -AA grade (not 10 stole) NOTES: Channelize runoff to sediment Sedimen{ Trapping Device trapping device Ribbed a Corrugoted sleel plates AI A a/ �E d x 4 i CC - CL Q to s z 24• min. k Slope 0Tr0y from LAF highway I% 5D' in. Match Ly Or Right of Way } Existing Grade PLAN TiT1e: Commercial Gravel Standard Plate Library Construction Entrance City of Monticello Data: os- t 4 Plate No. d R°"I$°d:03-15 6002 M -,Jr 4a° PLAN cASTFFG i0 SET 0., b• nae WET F.A AND C+ 1 - BELOW Canal REwPON! Sao CxSTRO - NEENWIr Mot R -DOT] -V M111 OONC IC t �wWNNO1 DOVER ToKi° ADA I •s I I rLONEFEIE doa11]uSE RE �n 'H �01RT.06 AND ONSRE aF STRUCTVRE •Rrrrlvl A1n PIE cOM1ECTOM L gn1FH;x}• VNtNS 6 Ort 51RHc1uR[ GT FrE _ I CCRCRETi CATCH a A+ uwHaE J' ,p,�.T�^ ANIO BASE 10 eE CAEIC, TWE use OR �D EOWL ,. eA6E /o aE aROulEo t0 IbRTI A STnoM VIM, TO ourLEr. SECTION 1 F CO-p/ry TO nE LOGARO 'CRETA[ GFp F.Sw PRwOLES HLUINED M OREETI 6PAOE3 SMLL BE G rAY rED Oi k[FE uxr A-C.;ICA # MIR , V.- IY P n, .00u TSE rj•Snil� 5 W OF g R --M. IN N;I.Tp. 9ALI wPP•0[S LDOT[D IN DRIi><N*S AWL 1C CO UGTED R[H M ra[MRK Top Sub rnM A i]• 40-3 OFUNI THE OAGTwC SP:L BE NEEFaw R-Tsoe-A2. Tale: Catch Basin Standard Plate Library Manhole Cit►° or Monticello Date: 03_05 Data ND. ReRlaed: 4003 fl3-15 rR.asl'1AAu � CONCRETE ar1M.w °�l,c[ e'Wa[ - ATKK ��LE56 TWIN !• T e-. a' . s' n1p •AA � ifss MVe 6' ]l``VI�CI��l (�1L- AT P1 OSSOG WXFOR e• SDRrXPw H -b euro PIIST,C FAY 011 APPROYID COWL yf 'L AJ z1,aa1 SIREIs ,' uoN MSE AFW Y MOTH ANSE 1Kq[- w^ A1GN REAWerED FDR WSTERyWN MInF LESS THM1 S' CMiR x CRA55'1 MGS NW 6' RIRR aNOER PAtt;p A ACES Title: Insulation Standard Plate Library Detail City of Monticello Data: 03-05 Plata No, Rmrlsed: 2004 03-15 NOTC ru 410 PER,AT .(L CrtarvAT10[ NNDAA AMC IP1RS Di 11[ IeLI A]RI rypAA.Y • 1 BE AS rpuMr 1 ] 2 1 ANO pHMAY sIAu,L TAKE PVOK THE Tux Fy LawNO ExGwTTarl oFYTeMrka ' w.L LIu AHO a,EW, x swul nincE RHE -N Or f,1E E GVATKW IE 9.fED FRcx E1[H LQx or it[ CtCww _n ALL ala Ala pASJA,AY I. YE FROM CENTERLBC Oi R TO THE FROAn EDGE W vAe uNLi55 OCA NOK AR[A EiNfAaACKS INTO tIR o1MK LAZE D< rD Ta, TFEH AHE Yr HE RRET SRu IINLLUOE ME Fuµ WIO1.1 br TAE STREET �. LFMm MEA ANiL eE PERTpNDOyLAR ro THE CFMrEq➢E Df THE S,REET IT s m waOE EKcautKN TCAs occas IN I]tE anET1, AHE ENME Bn[R sAR.L er Mum Mo alm.am CURB� LINE E%DAVATRNN AREA 11IR.L HIO aYERLAY A CORRuNt ROAD SA*CLff an BASE I' FROM EXCAVATION EDGE S\ACUI en WEAR 2' FROM !EXCAVATION EDGE CCUBO�C) UNE - - R.o.w - - - - HCTC -Tia, nc OAS,- FRnrlpNs IASE ONSOM TKWE3S GAL li TIC ros,NHG wnAF110Ai KEw COOIGE T,F[awCYS Ia' T.[ rLaLaRIG TIAL ITE rREA fiAR1 K wu.ED AHD 06FNAv ruu oERTF1 sandrt x elTwMars NLASE s eEpF11ED ,• ARGwD LTcwATOH mu Fuµ OEP,H s&RoDn or 9RIIFaTus WEAR s Rpqu%p i' M01I10 rxavf NON Earl 1' 1' en WEAR COURSE BR BASE COURSE 1' - L7.A'S 5 - %7-7, 'STANDARD I I=1[ 959 STANDARD PROCTOR1TION APEI W DT �ES))AP RIOVED STAPES TO EY AIG UiIL -1111-III-1I rile: Utility Excavation in Streets Standard Plate Library that are Less than 5 Years old City of Monticello Date: o3-08 Plate No. - R°RIe°d:03-15 7007 , role: Standard Plate Library Watermain Offset City or Monticello Date: 03-05 Rl�e No. J R-iseir2005 03-15 / r r- v OR s w D a v Calle Prre+oBED sTORN Tc.ER CONCRETE IKrLN OR AT P1 OSSOG WXFOR HIFIAFARNOFA &MMN SEE RLATI 10011 MNDOT SPEC 3149.2B rw DEn,As . 11=III=III=1 6" TO PASS PROOF ROLL WATFPvbr �5 I CONFORM TO MNDOT SPEC. 2461 eI(/KOfr 11.WGEI]R 1 Tor 4ASAAAI EunARE . °� °N SOI 1PE SIGN TYP @ EACH FRAC eMry 1f1C [rraAED NFUGEl F1M�m cxRx, T, �1 Pn�g1yE 2 TE Roes Fha11 {ETU TO M10. RPE JOIFTS MDRI e' _THIS HANDICAP PARKING SPACE OF A BFIIO SHILL EE RESIWW40 a4Ha NE RpoS IOP role: Standard Plate Library Watermain Offset City or Monticello Date: 03-05 Rl�e No. J R-iseir2005 03-15 / r r- v OR s w D a v Calle 4" CONCRETE PAVEMENT CONCRETE IKrLN OR CO HIFIAFARNOFA ifAulp/S PATH ARE PKESEM' MNDOT SPEC 3149.2B -I � I -III -III -III -III -III =1 I -I I -I I -III -III to" VKT]µ IT 1➢10A1R 11=III=III=1 6" TO PASS PROOF ROLL x010" art IX amER iNN: 7". m Q o ro IHSMUFD oN PLW4n CORN. CONFORM TO MNDOT SPEC. 2461 eI(/KOfr 11.WGEI]R 1 Tor 4ASAAAI EunARE . °� °N SOI 1PE SIGN TYP @ EACH FRAC eMry 1f1C [rraAED NFUGEl F1M�m cxRx, T, �1 O _THIS HANDICAP PARKING SPACE uftan IOP 3" GALVANIZED STEEL POLE L� 2 LAKRS g E' A'- e• As REQUIRED P0.Y 0 .0 25 _- �Ua ,ER IT O' DEEP PiT I fi PFORARI ruFO WH I I ° SREL 10µE BW AOAPIpt W Or , C,v. tK CLERR STORE n MIR pROTECFNE XAnIG As wWLFACnIREO NO' ADAPTOR IAO. W �•'I I. N OR APPROyED EIX LI[G1aW NEGRAID O ,L �� co ii a: a M[GkuG 1 �lI ` WTE YyyE TEE � �_ FR01x 1E xmw T Nm oR WINE TEE oR wATERuD W SPTC,F1CD 1'. 1 4'j Pcws rRDu rkLc r o TWAANO Title: Standard Plate Library Typical HydrantInstallation City or Monticello Date: 03_05 Ptots No. A - Revlsad:03 15 2001 1811 4" CONCRETE PAVEMENT �- WHITE ON BLUE CO 4" SELECT GRANULAR BORROW 00 T MNDOT SPEC 3149.2B -I � I -III -III -III -III -III =1 I -I I -I I -III -III \ PARKING BY DISABLED PERMIT ONLY TTOW AWAY BLACK ON WHITE 11=III=III=1 6" TO PASS PROOF ROLL 2DNE�- FINE UP TO $250.00 W/ 1.511 LETTERS HANDICAP SIGNCa m Q o V CONFORM TO MNDOT SPEC. 2461 MIX No. 3Y22A FOR W SIGN TYP @ EACH MANUAL PLACEMENT O _THIS HANDICAP PARKING SPACE uftan CC 3" GALVANIZED STEEL POLE co CL ■ _ Lift FINISH GRADE f � I fi Uj I I ° CONCRETE o Q Z W �•'I I. N •s I I , O ,L �� co ii a: a " Milli1'-0 �_ a) (0 W HANDICAP SIGN co 2" BITUMINOUS WR \ \ \ SPWEB240B MnDOTS ECURSE 2360 2" BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE SPNWB230B MnDOT SPEC 2360 Oo 6" CLASS V AGGREGATE BASE MnDOT SPEC 3138 =1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 I I =1 I -I I -I I -III -III -III SUBGRADE PREPARATION TOP -I I -I I -I 11=1 11=1 I I 6" TO PASS PROOF ROLL BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT NOTE: SOILS SPECIFICATIONS SUPERSEDE ABOVE LISTED SPECIFICATIONS :. 4" CONCRETE PAVEMENT MNDOT SPEC 2461 CO 4" SELECT GRANULAR BORROW MNDOT SPEC 3149.2B -I � I -III -III -III -III -III =1 I -I I -I I -III -III -I I I -III SUBGRADE PREPARATION TOP 11=III=III=1 6" TO PASS PROOF ROLL NOTES: m Q o 1. CONCRETE MIX SHALL CONFORM TO MNDOT SPEC. 2461 MIX No. 3Y22A FOR SLIPFORM PLACEMENT MIX No. 3Y32A FOR MANUAL PLACEMENT 2. CONCRETE PLACEMENT SHALL CONFORM TO MNDOT SPEC. 2301 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL SPACE THE CONTRACTION JOINTS AT 6'-0" O.C. 4. SOILS SPECIFICATIONS SUPERSEDE ABOVE LISTED SPECIFICATIONS CONCRETE PAVEMENT - SIDEWALK L :. ;• •t 6" CONCRETE PAVEMENT . •:•.. .• ,• WITH REINFORCEMENT; SEE DETAIL 6" SELECT GRANULAR BORROW MNDOT SPEC 3149.2B -I � I -III -III -III -III -III -I I I =1 I -I I -I I -III -III -III SUBGRADE PREPARATION TOP 11=III=III=1 6" TO PASS PROOF ROLL NOTES: 1. CONCRETE MIX SHALL CONFORM TO MNDOT SPEC. 2461 MIX No. 3Y22A FOR SLIPFORM PLACEMENT MIX No. 3Y32A FOR MANUAL PLACEMENT 2. CONCRETE PLACEMENT SHALL CONFORM TO MNDOT SPEC. 2301 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL SPACE THE CONTRACTION JOINTS AT 12'-0" O.C. 4. SOILS SPECIFICATIONS SUPERSEDE ABOVE LISTED SPECIFICATIONS CONCRETE PAVEMENT - HEAVY DUTY INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: CO PROJECT LOCATION PLAN C1 SITE PLAN C2 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN C3 SANITARY AND WATER UTILITY PLAN C4 STORM SEWER UTILITY PLAN C5 LANDSCAPE PLAN C6 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C7 EXISTING CONDITIONS AND REMOVALS PLAN C8 DETAILS C9 PHASING PLAN a t; o 00 L•2` 1 I + N0) it N '� 1 U) to N C C I p to O E ° c �to1 0 V L O Z WA., I 7� O�-6 "oo tiw lox 1 0 v4i E ai m ca o `0 L O O � W l� l U� �N U c oA c ~ IW°CLai3 4,�: ti I C: 00 ° V I 0 0 � •E.. a, v 4+ 3 I 4- J -1.. V) �. Q� O t y O N O 13 w O a 2 O N CO rw V toto 00 O � a: m Q o f - m W v v Z w CJ fi O r Q Z CL a t; o 00 L•2` 1 I + N0) it N '� 1 U) to N C C I p to O E ° c �to1 0 V L O Z WA., I 7� O�-6 "oo tiw lox 1 0 v4i E ai m ca o `0 L O O � W l� l U� �N U c oA c ~ IW°CLai3 4,�: ti I C: 00 ° V I 0 0 � •E.. a, v 4+ 3 I 4- J -1.. V) �. Q� O t y O N O 13 w O a 2 O FILE NO. 00633 • Details V CIO 00 O O ti 0 m Q o m W a m W v v FILE NO. 00633 • Details oo0 I 1 I I 1 I 1 I I I I 1 I I I I SAN MH RIM ELEV.=961.96 ��h1 INV. ELEV.=943.7 -961-` 960.6 Xj.Op 962.1 X_ - - M 1 1 ' I D U N DAS �� ROAD 1 I X - 1 10 D.I.P. � O \ 15 R. C. P-00 ' ;� �N MH = �``� ; /960 RIM ELEV.=960.04 �� 960.0V1,__ i' & 959.90 INV. ELF�V.=942.8 961_11 960.66 `� 960 - - )k-,060- 960 °so* ( -°100 959.79 _ _ r _ -960- - - - - ` c--_=`8 °��9»-n, 9 _ X958.6 959 x I X 1 - - _ (X 959.31- 95_9.2 T " 6o�9s+_ RISER 959.7. - T T T T T -, T �9� ^ - 960 T� - °'o /� ° - - - ------- �3�'., X -+961960 1----yb1------------ __ ---------- - »-» --- 962- '==y�----'\1-�0----- ---?°01.5--��' X961.5 _ 962 _ V x - - - -so jaIv I(:g � I1 9t o.4 'po `p �0 962 eryk° rotikp s6 96�o U o aEASF ! 9 62 > i �CLl a I 963.0 X X63.r- I . K 9�9 - I 62.962.8 Q ��4OOc 11 oI-?�nlI "' lI------ - 963 ----_-_ co T a _ Cr - I1 109 -�I 109 I - -00 - 4- 9,, 1.2 -91.'.2 ACCESS DRIVE AND ACCESS DRIVE AND I ti`h 1' - _ _ _ - _ - - - _ - I I g62151# \ ASSOCIATED UTILITIES TO ASSOCIATED UTILITIES TO 0 f961 L! 62.2 �0p- f I I! BE INSTALLED AS PART OF BE INSTALLED AS PART OF w h i 96ti 1 BUILDING 962/ ab BUILDING B I 'I 61.9 PHASE 1 IMPROVEMENTS PHASE 1 IMPROVEMENTS 9 x;2,5 6, 9 7 6, 9 76 SF I I I I I I \ I; F I 963.1 X) o f I _1 11 I ; \ / X 964.2 • FFE=963.50 \� =,l 0 1 \ w x 96' 6, /-'-FFE=963_ I _x I T i X 61 \ 962 ; \ X 961.9 962.0 ' %3 \ \ I so'. u rn \ 1 \ v u O-o-O"o"O"o'"O'"O�O O I `'O'''O 0-0,0- 0 0 0 0 0 0 N � `- IVOOOODO�o�o�ODO�ODO000fb00 O O,O�O„O_O_O_o o r 170 , O � I I (��--LI�JE' 9ss \ 1 10I 1 p I �j o � \ X co �6 2 r o 6 00 - - �ryp 96, ° X\961j8X 963.7 963.7 / �, I• o 96.5x' � .-.-.- 9-�-�-.-.-.- 1� I "{ \ 1 \ \ I 1 ° I / 6� ' 964.3 I -,-- ,- 00, 901 1 ISI I 1 x 0 1_�oO' g I - ��1 \ 9�7 i. I I u u 0 0= "0'`0;0-o I 6 , v 060-0- -o o-o"o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 u v o- -a-o-0"0"0"0"0"0"0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 X ovovou.0000000000000 0 0 0 0 0 0'0_19 0 0 0 0 tg6 I I \ 40000000000 ►+ 960.9 MOW --_ 1 962s1,% \ I +I I �, I IX 1963 Ix96�� 00 LINE I iI \ r---___ I 11 I \ 1 M0w1 I I 1 (,oCO I 1 11 I 1.7 //X961.0 Ix �1• \1� LINE I I I \� I/-�� BUILDING D II I I I 1 BUILDING C - 6,976 SF I '�6�� X961 X 960.6 I 11 w x X 963.9 964.5 I I 16ti`o 1' / 6 9 76 SFz'\O ', 1 X 960. 96 X I I *9 I I �8 962y -i / I1 •---wo F _NCE FFE=963.50 FFE=963.50 n I I I \ 1 1 1111 I r, Q 1 I I 964.4 �r'1 C0 �F + \- / 109 I 11 I °� 1 I CO II \ -9 )12.;�ON _o7 LINE 109 - �1 Q i I 1 X96' .5 "� n - -- -- --- -- .:-___ '_- 66_6 6--_-=-_-= =\ 1F L G 4==-= - -9� I I 1 I I I I x o - -963-- - -------6666-- 6666 96r J 963 --- 96, II o X95.61 ° X 963.8 -- - - r - -- - 966 5' oC I \ I - II ro I I + I\'100 160 �,9 • ; 0 1 3 11 .\ lO \ 1 \ �p �yo - J �;1 I I I / 11 • ` \ ''9 °O \wo'6 Itilt r.2 F�' 1 `o % s? � . 9 - ry0 �o \ �o - 96, I+! �'` C X 5.51 11 - yo 6� 6ti 9 g2 20 X I 9 I 62.31 °0 qb�' �9 `' I 0959.4 �� X 963.8 9 lI 962 yo - ••�,� =� I ICHAINLINK FENCE CORNER + \- • o. \ 196ti°I 1I I 5.1 FT. EAST OF LOT LINE I I1 I 0 \ \ 1 � 11 • 11 �lO \ \ I 911 59.0\ \\ \ \ \ 963.4X X 962.7' 9 0" 196-----------------6666-- ----�\ -- 963 66 66-6666-- 6666--=o 66 66--6666-_ _ --- 963°� I II I. I I \\ \\\\ g2 n LOp 6Ni 1 - - 11-00, T 1 ■ a II //1 I 111 109 X 961.3 I I I I \\ \ \\ \X 962.4 I . ;; 1 109 61.L / Q`1�• I I \ ,• I o I \ CHAINLINK ---�^ 912 111 X 961.8 FENCE +\- 1 II /' /� _�� // I �11 I I ON LOT LINE. I,0 -11 / \' / I 1'19601 til it = 0 \ \ \\ OX 960.5 Aro I It _ BUILDING E ��'� BUILDING F d- 11 I 962°I„ Nt- X 958.6 11 1 �� 11 CO 6,976 SF 6,9 76 SF I - ' FFE=963.x960.4 50 FFE=9\ 11 63 _ ; 1 962.5014`1�61.X 961.5 -� x 9:x.9 1v u u o 0 0 080- 0 0 ( 1 �� ., u u o- o`�"o"o"o'"o"'0 0 0 0 �°o 0100 0_0_0_0.0 X 962.6 ; \ u 0 0 0 0 0 0 0''0' 0"0° 00000000000000' 0' 0 0 0 0 0� 4 0 0 0 \-9 1 o I 1 \ 1 X�uo; .8 , i �M 1 1_ I 1 X 958.7 1 _ I e6 y I O 96, I 1 1 s6�9T �ti° - °6ti 06"'� / '�0 " 0 ACCESS DRIVE AND ° - 06 9� q 11 ASSOCIATED UTILITIES TO ACCESS DRIVE AND � -*V - - I `<-� rn i ASSOCIATED UTILITIES TO - ] BE INSTALLED AS PART OF 1 96'0 - g6� I _ g6� I II PHASE 1 IMPROVEMENTS BE INSTALLED AS PART OF 1 / / \' 961.4 x X 961.3 o =1 96.4 \ PHASE 1 IMPROVEMENTS \; ov - I T Gpl n. 0 30 60 90 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET SURVEY DATA SURVEY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY: MEYER ROHLIN LAND SERVICES 708 1st AVENUE NE BUFFALO, MN 55313 DATED: APRIL 18, 2017 BENCHMARK: MN/DOT GEODETIC MONUMENT "8605 S" ELEVATION = 966.55 NAVD88 DATUM PROJECT LOCATION PART OF THE SW4 AND NE4, SECTION 14 TOWNSHIP 121, RANGE 25, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA. EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 2, BLOCK 3, OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA. PROJECT PHASING TIMELINE PHASE 1 2017-2018 PHASE 2 2018-2019 PHASE 3 2020-2021 PHASE 4 2022-2023 MARKET CONDITIONS MAY RESULT IN MODIFICATION OF PHASING TIMELINE AND PHASING OF SITE IMPROVEMENTS ^, v u o o6060 -o o g I .. u u o, 4000-0-0- 0"0000 000000 6y 1 u u-o-o-o•'o"o"o 0 0"0 0 0 0 0 0 0 v u-0'0`0-0- 00-"0"0"0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 �o 1 00000000�0„0„0„0„01'0 _ o_ o o '•Oj = 1 / 1 962s1 , \X 959.9 X_961.0 1 I X961.3 1C14 II I1 \ 1 a 0 I I X 962.7 96ti`y �� BUILDING G �� \\ BUILDING H ID 1 = bry,11 o } \ 6, 9 76 SF x 96n 9 -- 5. P + \- 11 96��I1' 6, 976 SF „ I 11 , < \ I 11 I 11 1 : 0 CHAINLINK --� 1 1962.3 1, 1 \\ FFE963.50 I1I / FENCE +\- ;� FFE=963. \ = r I I X 960.7 0.5 FT. WEST OF LOT LINE. 1 109 109 ;s' 1 0 1 13 0 I I n 1 I1 I9 � \ 96I 3----- A-6- N o 62.30' - -6_666- s -66-r- - co963 I rn .6 101Z` 1-1 ' %�g6, •$O', - 1.1 X 960.6 :. I O - ! i ssiso ,. 1 96ti. \96ti 951.7 6ti� o - ;; / 11 _ 9.962 � , I %9 5 / \ ?� ° X962.4 I s1 „ / 6h ° i I 26666-� I 63, �� I 6666 962.6X °6�. 962 °b��o I ``1��6666----------- 962 962.9x 90 _ 6666 6666- 96 - _ _- _ 6666-- ---- 6.666----- � g62 -ter.-.-- -- ------ o / --'''- 962 J`�� .961 961 960 -- �� F IZ 960 959 958 0 LANDSCAPE t 959 958 \ 957 -EDGING/MULCH 957 O 1 \ 1 01 Q 9s, �� -' / \ ,g6� ; -- CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER + \- �� `(1 I� -0 _ _ _ - _ / / 962.2 96 / _ °' \ `I - ' 5.8 FT. EAST OF LOT LINE ° / �-�-_ / X--__ X961.8 967.2 `,\\ / _� �� 9 i\�\ u aFP 3 - -' \\ r 957' 096' I ---SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER + \- 1Ii ' - 958 957 ` �' _ - - 959 958 1 /4 OF SECTION 14, T. 121, R. 25 0.4 FT. WEST OF LOT CORNER 959 .960 bbl N 89°14'00" E \ c 960 X 96,T4 -1899 5 E _ 961-----6666-- �- -x--- � X- 6666-- 961 -----r- ----------------6666-- -- _6666-- 6 ------------ ------ ------ -; 6666 --- 6666-- ------3123.56-- -' ,\ -- 962 ---2yy 81 N �,y f�Uu E - y9.? �0-,1 - li 1899 --- 964.2x 963-- _ ------------------------- _ -0 962.5 r ---------------�_ ,, -�-� C? // 961.3 963.7 �� o -&- "�s�Q = _ �� _ _ - - _ - - - _961- / 1 00000 `S�� Mow_, o �°� R -__ - ----- - �,- �9s2__-�� INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: - a°��4? - - �� SHED - - LINE - �, i�--960- SQA\�� - 4C 958.96 = M' _ _ - - _ ` �� _ _ 1 X 961.6 961-f- -- 1 --- --�_--X960.2 \\\959 ah�vSTOP 960.5X; -L60- ANDSCAPE CO PROJECT LOCATION PLAN --TEL. �G x _x x \ RISER EDGING/MULCH C2 GITE PLAN RADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN �co LANDSCAPE- GOLDEN EAGLE ROAD h�� --CCB FL ', _ _ _ _ _ �h EDGING/ROCK °' �LEV.=958.16_ - _-=SOUTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL � r- - - - - - -r - & SHRUBS \ PARK (DOC.# 275353) AS MONUMENTED; ALSO C3 SANITARY AND WATER UTILITY PLAN SAN MH x I NORTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF KLEIN FARMS I I I C4 STORM SEWER UTILITY PLAN ELEV.=958.59--. 958.7 I ESTATES 2ND ADDITION (DOC.# 753470) I I I C5 LANDSCAPE PLAN ------ -------I� \ � I I I I I I C6 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C7 EXISTING CONDITIONS AND REMOVALS PLAN Ga I I I I I I I C8 DETAILS I I/ F__I n I I F__n F_ -)A ,h �` 11- �` _T_n _T_ F_ �` �h� n I I n n I -`i I S I /� N I I ► I I C 9 PHASING PLAN � w � ct kr) W 0 kr) o� M O 0 cn ct ct W ct 0�4 cu Lu CL ' N O co w "Nom CC 10cv) Q •co a O t to cn Lft a 1-Zm•+ ZZ z g W Ld Zia - w 0 Q) W c _O __j z O O o= •- CL •� CL O Z r ° o MOM co W CL o = ^^ '' v, a o co may' ��lo �0E ° c CW` Lj co Lo I o V L O Z W I OLO c: -6 Its 4 y p W Ico 0 m oEo `a°i�V)0U�U c ~ w�+ ai3 o�� 4 j ~ i p c 3 o� 0 J O U O O D IZ L Q ra X, " o b 2 0 FILE N0. 00633 C9 Phasinq Plan O O 0 DO o a v FILE N0. 00633 C9 Phasinq Plan TRUSS BRNG. ELEV. 109'-0" TRUSS BRNG. ELEV. 116'-O" STEEL SIDING COLOR "A' TRUSS BRN�. ELEV. 109'- " CORNER TRIM FIN. FLOOR ELEV. 100'-0" CULTURED STONE PROVIDED ON NOi OF NORTH BUIDINC SOUTH WALL OF SOUTH BUILDINGS ONLY WOOD POST W/ METAL WRAP 3C,4LE: 1/8" = 1'-O" TRUSS BRNG. ELEV. 116'-O" EEL SIDING COLOR "A" CORNER TRIM STEEL SIDING COLOR "B" FIN. FLOOR ELEV. 100'-O" TRUSS BRNG. ELEV. 116'-O" STEEL SIDING COLOR "f CORNER TRIM STEEL SIDING COLOR "B" ,AFIN. FLOOR ELEV. 100'-0" METAL WRAP j C ,4 L: I/ 8 = I'— V ,JbTRUSS BRNG. ELEV. 116'-O" STEEL SIDING COLOR " CORNER TRIM STEEL SIDING COLOR "B" �JhFIN. FLOOR ELEV. 100'-0" SCALE: 1/8" = I' -U" METAL WRAP TRUSS BRNG. ELEV. 109'-O" F�E,4R ELEV/4T10N SC,4LE: 1/8" = 1'-O" fv � I.I.I N w ZH GJ s s z CK m 0 m w F ro,leat No. °2 1,101,91 0 C Iasue Dzte ?-?? J C oc iment S t: V???? 0 w 0 J d TRUSS BRNG. ELEV. 116'-0" STEEL SIDING COLOR "A" TRUSS BRNG. ELEV. 109'-0" CORNER TRIM 10• I AFIN. FLOOR ELEV. 100'-0" CULTURED STONE PROVIDED ON NORTH WALL OF NORTH BUIDINGS AND SOUTH WALL OF SOUTH BUILDINGS ONLY TRUSS BRN� ELEV. 116'- -- 2 1:2 12 STEEL SHAKE SIDING WOOD POST W/ METAL WRAP TRUSS BRNG. ELEV. 116'-0" FfP,,0 NT ELE\/� SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 12 / TION �i STEEL SIDING COLOR "A" STEEL SIDING COLOR "A" TRUSS BRNGG,-NP�I ELEV. 109'- b ------- CORNER TRIM CORNER TRIM ,,—STEEL SIDING COLOR "B" STEEL SIDING COLOR "B" FIN. FLOOR FIN. FLOOR ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------- ------ ELEV. 100'-0" ELEV. 100'-0" SIEDE ELEVATION SIIDE ELEV74TION WOOD POST SCALE: 1/8„ , „ „ , = I O SCALE: 1/8 = 1'-0” „ 4:: TRUSS BRNG. ELEV. 116'-0" J STEEL SIDING COLOR "A" } CORNER TRIM i STEEL SIDING COLOR "B" q FIN. FLOOR ELEV. 100'-0" _= awi WOOD POST W/ METAL WRAP RE,,4R ELE\/�TI0N SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 4:1: TRUSS BRNG ELEV. 109'- ■ 0 ■ z s U z rn, i�Ti •7R�� I'10i9 0 C Issue Otte; w ??-;?-?? C oc ime nt S t: ■ ■ �i J_ r � Z --I ■ 0 ■ z s U z rn, i�Ti •7R�� I'10i9 0 C Issue Otte; w ??-;?-?? C oc ime nt S t: ■ ■ �i 109'-01, 61_01; 2,_3„ 12,_6„ 3,_3„ 61_01, 6,_O„ 6,_O„ 2,_9„ 12,_6„ 2,_9„ 3,_311 12,_6„ 2'-3" 6'-O" 6'-O" 6'-6" ®EM�® 3070 I mmm mmm 3070 3070 INSUL. U L ®■® - - INSUL. - - - INSUL. - - - STEEL J x I IXI I F #� _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Iw I • Ix] 1 Ixl x Ixl I I #� IXI I I )CI I I Iw Ixl 1XI �F ° _ _ _ _ _ _ _ �lxl 1XI I ________ IXI I ?� I — 4020 `—� `I `— ----4020 �_� �t —I, I_ ABO 4020 U) ABOVE I ABOVE I I ABOVE I I I I I I U Ep � U o�c I o�c I I o�2 ODl9 9) al �� u / \\ I I I I I I / \ � Ln y� 0 I I I I I I I I d N 3 I I X 3 I I I I I I ap I, I I I I y I I 12' x-14' O.H.D. 1 12'_x 14' O.H.D. I 12'—x 14' O.H.D. �- � I I — E +' i c p I X X I 10 v y y N I I U u' a m I m _ E Q a l y a u> m I v' Q �-N ' 7 QI y � " WHAREHOUSE WHAREHOUSE WHAREHOUSE _ $ .' _ 1 I �I y E r 8,_2,. �,_1„ 1q,_6„ �,_6„ 81_211 8,_2„ 5,_�„ 18,_O„ 1q,_6„ �,_1„ R '01 ME 73 q)57< X X m v \\ \\ aSL W 73 F O � I � 0 I n I (n (n (n x (LLJn cLU LU n cn X '.. a- a- 0- I 3070 II t INSUL. 3070 r= II - ----- --I 3070 oo I- U v' :STEEL �, IF INSL.��FNSUL. Z pv 1-- -STEEL -STEEL - \ X R-STROOM I RES fR00M RESTROQM \ X 4,-- * ------ ---' * i 3070 3070 3070 INSUL. INSUL. INSUL. STEEL STEEL STEEL L O r O - 0 — z C5.. OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE z o O ao z 4020 4020 - 4020 4040 / v / v / v_ABOVE / / �v / v 4040 / v / �v / �v ABOVE _,' �v �v / v ABOVE _1_ v / �v / �v 4040 X I I j l XI I I IXI I 1 .. � SITE NOTES 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL LABOR, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT NECESSARY FOR A COMPLETE AND FUNCTIONAL ELECTRICAL SYSTEM. 2. MATERIALS AND INSTALLATION SHALL COMPLY WITH CODES, UTILITY REQUIREMENTS, LAWS AND ORDINANCES OF FEDERAL, STATE, OSHA AND LOCAL GOVERNING BODIES HAVING JURISDICTION. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL CODES AND STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO THIS PROJECT THAT ARE LISTED BUT NOT LIMITED TO: NEC, NFPA, NEMA, ANSI, IES, IEEE, NFPA LIFE SAFETY 101, ASHRAE 90.1, IECC ENERGY CODE AND IBC BUILDING CODE. 4. PRIOR TO ANY DIGGING, TRENCHING, ETC. CONTACT ALL LOCAL UTILITY COMPANIES AND MUNICIPALITIES AND CONFIRM EXACT LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. 5. MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT SHALL BE LISTED AND/OR LABELED BY UL OR ANOTHER NATIONALLY RECOGNIZED TESTING LABORATORY. 6. ALL MATERIAL, EQUIPMENT, WIRING DEVICES, ETC SHALL BE NEW, UNLESS SPECIFICALLY NOTED AS EXISTING TO BE REUSED. 7. ALL MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT SHALL BE STORED, HANDLED, ERECTED, INSTALLED, CONNECTED, CLEANED, ADJUSTED, TESTED, CONDITIONED AND PLACED IN SERVICE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUFACTURERS DIRECTIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. 8. COORDINATE THE UTILITY COMPANY SERVICE FEEDS AND INSTALLATION. 9. ALL POLE FIXTURES TO BE LOCATED 4' AWAY FROM EDGE OF CURB. 10. ALL EXTERIOR LIGHT FIXTURES TO BE CONNECTED TO A COMMON EQUIPMENT GROUND. USE #8, TYPE THWN. 11. ALL CIRCUIT TO BE PLACED IN 1" CONDUITS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. CIRCUIT TO USE COPPER WIRE, TYPE THWN. 12. THE CONTROLLING LIGHTING CONTACTORS SHALL BE MOUNTED INSIDE THE BUILDING WITH TIME -CLOCK CONTROL & REMOTE PHOTOCELLS LOCATED ON THE EXTERIOR SIDE OF THE BUILDING WALL. INSTALL PHOTOCELLS AT LOCATIONS WHERE BUILDING OR OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS WILL NOT INTERFERE WITH THEIR PROPER OPERATION. FINAL BRANCH CIRCUIT SUPPLY CONNECTIONS WILL BE PROVIDED BY THE BUILDING ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS. 13. MIN. BURIAL DEPTH FOR THE LIGHTING CIRCUIT SHALL BE 24". A SLIGHT DECREASE IN DEPTH IS ALLOWED WITHIN 10' OF THE POLES. 14. VERIFY CONSTRUCTION AREAS ON OTHER SITE PLANS FOR POTENTIAL OBSTACLES AND CONSTRUCTION LIMITS. ELECTRIC GENERAL NOTES 1. ALL WORK SHALL BE COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH NATIONAL, STATE AND LOCAL ELECTRICAL CODES. 2. ENERGY CODE WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASHRAE 90.1 2010. 3. COORDINATE WORK WITH ALL OTHER TRADES. 4. EQUIPMENT SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. 5. ALL WIRING SHALL BE INSTALLED IN APPROVED RACEWAYS. 6. ALL EQUIPMENT GROUNDING CONDUCTORS SHALL BE INSTALLED AT ALL LOCATIONS. 7. ALL MEASUREMENTS TO TOP OF BOX. RECEPTACLES SHALL BE 20" A.F.F. SWITCHES SHALL BE 48" A.F.F. 8. GFI PROTECT ALL RECEPTACLES WITHIN 6' OF EVERY SINK. II II �I t1 II T -rte �� '-----------------------------� II II 11 I I II II II 1 II I I n +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 II + + + + + +0 + + + \ 10. + +0.71 1 1� 02dI 0.4 05 0.4U0 0.5 0.6 0.5 03 0.7 0.7 06 0.6 1,0 0. 1 i�a1 ii \ II II II + + + + + + X11 + 11 + 0.1 11 0.3 .5 2.8 1.3 6.4 1.0 6.2�, AA 2.6 l!l2 0.1 1 0.1 ii O AA AA n AA " AA qA" II i0.1 .111 0.2 11 0.1 +0.3 11 0.1 i I I 0.2 .1 11 11 I /� II +0.1 +0.11 +0.7 l i 1.2 BUILDING A ; BUILDING B +2_i +0.9 i i '122 +0.1 I I 1 i, J.2 II SAA 11 AAc 6 976 SU 6,976 SC ;; 11 0.2 +0.1 t)` I 1.3 i +4.-/ 9 +30 +0.9 +0.2 +0.1 11 + +0.211 ill i ii 10.2 + � II + + I + 1 + _V1 0.1 +0.211 0.6 n. 0.9 0 0.3 11 II I j 1 II 0.1 ii 11 I i I to.1 7W11 i i +0.2 +d'� AA + a +„ + + u + + + + + 1.7 4.7 1.6 0.7 3.1 3.3 1.7 4.7 1.1 + 0.2 11 0.1 0.1 i i l 0.1 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + .1 11 0.2 0.8 2.2 1.5 1.7 1.8 0.8 1.0 1.9 1.5 1.8 1.1 0.7 1.3 1.4 1.2 1.4 0.7 0.2 11 111 0.1 l i !I 11 II+ + + + + + + _ _ _ _ _ - - -- - ---- � - 1 n --_F -F--- + + + + + + Q1 11 0.2 0.6 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.0 0.7 0.8 1.2 1.2 1.2 0.9 0.7 1.1 + + + + 1.2 1.0 1.2 0.7 0.2 11 0.1 10.1 + II 1 0.1 II 1 11 0.2 0.9 2.9 1.8 2.3 2.8 0.8 1.2 3.6 ¢'.0 3.8 1.8 0.8 3.0 2.9 1.5 4.4 _+1.2 0.2 1111 +�Oi1 1 - O O 1 11 // n n L --- O -- ___� I L - -_� L -_-J 0.1 +@i 11 +0.2 �I"+0.2--- ---� 1 J 11 +0.411 II +0.3 i i +C2 +0.1 0.2 �.1'II II I I 1 1 I II II n n I 1 ! 11 +0.1 +2 +0.5 11 +0.8 i 1.9 { { 1.0 i i +6112 +0.1 0.2i1' " BUILDING C BUILDING D H 9 76 SC SAA 11 ii .3 +0.1 +0131 i 1.0 i i+6 c 6, 9 7 6 S C 9 +4.4 111 1.5 111 +0.3 +0.1 0.2 10. 11 0.3 +0.1 +012 Iii +0.7 }2.0 i +0.8 1 +0.6 i i +0+Q.2 +0.1 III II 1 I I I II -01 }0.211 II I i 1 11 II 1111 �+ T0. + AA + IAA' + ii ii 11 `AA AA +O.Q Iii +0.3 11'1+0.4 u uAq 0.2 1.9gq 7.1 9 8Y + + 0.4 + 10.11 .1 11 0.2 it 0 0.1 0.1 II _ =�__-___= _�_-===�-T=====__� + + - Lr+- ----+- + + + + + + + + +� + + +14 + + 0..1 0.1 0.2 1.4 2.8 L 11 11 i 11 9 1.3 1 3 2.1 0.6 LO 1.8 0.8 1 U 1.0 1.0 1 4 0.4 I I 0.1 0.1111 � \ I I 11 + I + + + + + + + + + + +\ + + + + 0.2 0.3 0.3 ' 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.� 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 +0.1 11 II II _._.- -------- i -- - - - - - ---_-._._._._ - --- -- - ---_- - - u-- - - - - -- #----4 ----+ _ + _ + -+ + + + + + + + + + + 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 II II II rrf � II n �' 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 \ \D 0.4 0.5 0. 0.4 0.7 0.5 \\ 0.6 0.6 0.8 i1 0.3 I 0.1 11, � 111 II II ii I� \ 11 II II IIL � -_ "kms =_ _� --=t=- �L k __ _ _ _-___ -_ +- _ �++ +-_ -+- �- + + +0.1 2 LT�� r� 1 =_- - - 5.1 0.6 1.3 7. O.5 0.1 11'+0.1 0.1 I I OAA X0.1 i i i i AA 0 AA AA _ n AA AAo II II I I I I 1 II 11 0.1 +0.1 '0.1 1 i +0.2 2 i 1 '0.2 +0.3 110.2 +0.1 + II +0.1 0.2 11 0.1 0.1 11 0.4 0 2.0 11 1.6 0.4+0.2 +0.1 + + ' 11+ �I BUILDING S + 17- +0.211 BUILDING E SAA 11 + + 0.311+ 11 AAc 6 9 76 SU 1 6 9 9 76 SC 1111 + Illill -0.2 + 0.1 0.2 11 0.7 5 9 2.6 1.9 �.4 0.1 0.2 10.311 1 II II I I I II + + I+ +I + + 0.1 0.1 10.2ii 0.5 1i 1 0.4 11 2'0.1 0.1 I I III II I I I I II r '01 r ---r I r ---r 0 1 11 U V i +0.1 • 1+0.2 +0 u.2 " +2.6 + . 1.4 3.6 2.6 +0.4 I .1 0.1 +0.1 n 1 +0.1 111+0.2 +0.5 1.9 +2.3 1.5 +2.4 1.1 +0.8 1.9 1.9 1.8 1.8 +0.8 1.0 1.7 1.2 1.5 1.2 +0.4 14.1 +0.1 +0.1 ; I I 0.1 0.1 911111@.r ---0.'t---0.8---.6_- 1.0 1.0 0.8 --0.7 0.9 1.1 1f 1.1 1.0 0.7 ---0.8 1.1 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.4._._._111_,. n n 1 n 0.1 10.1 + F + + + + + + + + + ' + + + + + + + + + 0.1 1 110.1 0.4 1.5 2.2 1.4 2.5 1.2 0.7 2.2 2.4 ! 2.3 2.8 0.8 1.4 3.4 1.4 2.7 2.5 0.4 �1 �0.1 0.1 11 0 I�--- A L 1 I -- IL - 0.1 0.1 0. - 1.a .4 �---� ' ` - I 1. I 1 11+0.2 11 0.1 +0.111 I� ii it i0.1 II II I I 1 I II II +0.1+ 0.2 1 11.1 +oi +0.2+0.1 °•211 BUILDING G BUILDING H + 11 SAA ;; ;II 0.2 +0.1 00.4 +2.11 AAc 6 976 S C 1+3.2 +0! +0.1 1 ;1 6, 976 SC 9 10.211 .1 0.2 i I I +0.11.4 1.� i.6 i 1 1.0 +Oil 0.2+0.1 0.211 11 I I I 1 ! I I q1 F + r 1 ! 0.1 +0.1 0.1 '�.2 +0.� 1.2 u F j AAu u AA AAu Y0.9 S.2 +0!1 +0.1 + l u AA AAu AA 111 1 i0.1 0.1 �i1 0.11 0.5 115 1.5 1.� 3.5 0.9 34 1.21 I 0.6 27 1.3 22 0.9 2.2 1 0.9 0.1 I \� 11 � � 1 � � I /i 1 N i \ II + + + + + + ! + + + + +0 II 0.1 ) 0.4 '0.4 0.L 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.3 '0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 1 ELECTRICAL SITE LIGHTING PLAN E1.1 SCALE: 1" = 30' 0 15' 30' 60' LIGHTING LEGEND F-7-1 RECESSED 2x4 FLUORESCENT FIXTURE Z RECESSED 2x2 FLUORESCENT FIXTURE 0 INDICATES NIGHTLIGHT FIXTURE INDICATES EMERGENCY FIXTURE ® INDICATES EMERGENCY/NIGHTLIGHT FIXTURE I� SURFACE MOUNT 1x4 FLUORESCENT FIXTURE D HIGH BAY 2x4 FLUORESCENT FIXTURE SURFACE WALL MOUNTED FLUORESCENT FIXTURE SURFACE CEILING MOUNT FLUORESCENT FIXTURE 0 RECESSED DOWNLIGHT + SURFACE WALL MOUNTED FIXTURE SURFACE MOUNTED FIXTURE SURFACE MOUNTED PENDANT FIXTURE OUTSIDE POLE -MOUNT LIGHT FIXTURE EXTERIOR GROUND MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE EMERGENCY LIGHTING FIXTURE LED EXIT SIGN -SHADED AREA INDICATES ILLUMINATED FACE LED EXIT/EMERGENCY SIGN -SHADED AREA INDICATES ILLUMINATED FACE EXTERIOR EMERGENCY EGRESS LIGHT SINGLE POLE SWITCH $2 2 -POLE SWITCH $3 3 -WAY SWITCH $4 4 -WAY SWITCH sp SWITCH W/PILOT LIGHT OS1 WALL MOUNTED SINGLE LEVEL OCCUPANCY SENSOR FO -S2 WALL MOUNTED DUAL LEVEL OCCUPANCY SENSOR OS CEILING MOUNTED OCCUPANCY SENSOR NL INDICATES FIXTURE TO REMAIN ON FOR SECURITY PURPOSES A,B INDICATES LIGHT FIXTURE SWITCH -LEGS P -X INDICATES PANEL AND CIRCUIT NUMBER O INDICATES LIGHT FIXTURE TYPE EX INDICATES EXISTING FIXTURE RL INDICATES RELOCATED FIXTURE TC INDICATES FIXTURE CONTROLLED BY TIMECLOCK EM INDICATES EMERGENCY FIXTURE LIGHTING FIXTURE SCHEDULE TYPE LAMPS WATTAGE DESCRIPTION NOTES AA LED 26 LED WALL PACK, 4000K - NOTES: WPLED26 F I Projrct: Typo: Prepared By: Oats: Driver Info LED tela Type: Corstant Current Wars- 21 4'0 121111: 0211A Color Tel 500DK 2D6V- 0.16A Color Accuracy. 70 CRI 24611- 0.14A L7o Lhilitil 100000 21711:0.12A Lumens: 2.662 Inpvl Watts: 30W Elncacy: 90 LPW LED 26W Wallpacks. PA -1: Pending Ilrerrrral managerl system. 1f10•a00 hour Eflfclerl 88% L7011fespan$ Year Warranty. Color Ill Weigni 7.5 lbs Technical Specifications z Listings Ambient Tamporature: Country of Origin: UL Listing: Suitable for use in old°C ambienl lemperelwes. Designed by RAB in New Jersey and assembled in the Sullable for wet Iorallpns Suitable far moungrlg vat Cold Weather Slarll ng: USA by R9B's IBEW LWAI3 markers. 1.2m (4a) of the gmurM. Country of Origin: Dark Sky Approved: The minimum starting IampereWre is 40.6. Thermal Management: Designed by RA13 In New Jersey and assembled in The Internallbnal Dark Sky Assmalron has approved Taiwan. this Product as a full -toff, lolly shielded fumineire. Cast aluminum Thennel Management system forTrade Agreements Act Compliant: DLC Listed: optimal heat Sinking. The LPACK is designed for coal operation, most efficient oulpol and maximum LED life Thig product is a product of Taiwan and a "oesignaled TMs product Is on the Deatgn Lights CMSorl (DLC( by minimizing LEDjunctim tampetALUM. col end product that camptles w11h rile Trade Oualfaed Products List and is eligible fa raberes from Green Technology: Agreements Aa- DLCMember utilities. w GSA Sichedul0: DLC Preduat Code- Pa000170I Mercury and uV free. RoH3 car lianl components. U LED Charactaristica PplyEsler powder coat finish formulated wftout the Suitable in accordance vin FAR Subpar 25.4. O use of VDc or toxic Heavy metals. Equivalency: Lifespan: For use on LEED Buildings: to 175W Molal Halide. 100,0Mhour LED lifespan basad on IES LM -80 IDA Dark Sky means foal dos fhQure can ba Optical Opdea[ results and TW21 nal-ulatluna. used 10 ecmave TEED Credits for Light Pollution a LEEDl Calor Consistency: Reduction, BUG Rating: 7 -step Machdam Edlpse Wring to achlave oonsistanr Eloctrioal B1 U0 Go fl dune-ro-0alure -tor. Driver! BUG Rating: Color Stability: MuQicMp 26W high oulput long life LED Driver 61 Lia Go LED color tamperatum is warranded! Io shift no more Constant Current, 720rnA, Class 2, BkV Surge ii 200K in CCT over a 5 year period. Protection, l llDV-277V, 50.89 Mg. 100.24011.4 AMPS. Color Uniformity: THD' RAB's range of CCT (Correlated Color Temperature] 7.5% at 12W, 11%at 27711 follows trm g"'IdInes of he Amarican National other 5lonrded for Spedrmdon5 for rhe Chrom irity of Solid Slate Lignling 1831] Products. ANSI C7a.977- California Title 24: 2015. Sea WFLE02r><PC for a 2013 California Tfte 24 Construction compliant modal. IP Rating: Patients: Ingress Protection rating or IKE for dust end water Th. WPLED design ie protected by U.S. Pat. D594878, Canada Pat 134878, CNna Pat. Finish; CN301949IXi45. Cor envimnmenuft friendly polyester powder coatings are lormilill for high -d rmblll and long-lasting calor, and contains no VOC a twcic heavy metas. Need harp? Tach help line: 1886) FLAB- 5000 Email: ealss@r.1-Bl .corn Wabslla: www.rahwah.com Copynghl l 2014 RAB Llghfu+g Inc. AN Rights Reserved NMB: sperigcatill am subject W change at any are without notice WPLED26 ❑irnensions IIvlrte lfreR fkt�Ya __4 Jrrna. ao.r pL rdW Ordering Matrix Family watts Color Temp -PLED I 211= 2fiW Blank = ii (Cocl) V = 3DWK (Warm} N = 40ODK lNeutral) Pegs 1 or 1 Features kfign performance LED right engine Nsainlaina 70% of initial -mens at 100,0010 hauls WealheprdOf high temperature silicone gaskets Supanor heal Sinking with die cast aluminum Musing and external fins 1Da up to 277 Vohs `✓year Warrarry Sensor Filml Prow l Dimming Blank = No Sensor Blank - Bnonm Blank = No Photocell Blank = No Dfmmlrrg MS = Mini Sensor W = white Me = 12011 Button 1610 = Dlmrrlable ]PCS = 120V Swivel Ill = 277V Budde Need relp? Te h holy tine (seal RAB-t000 Email. sales*rabwub.com Wobsnel www.rabwob.com Copyngh192014 RAB Lighting Inc. All Rights Reserved Note: Specifioauons are subject to change at any time will real w a 0 w a z z 0 U Cn LLJ 0 z 0 Ld IY •• z O = LL_ CD U W W D F__ O Cn M w Q W U M M o O Lv Lv In O LIJ U J J � Z z = Q w 0 •• z O = LL_ CD U W W D F__ O Cn z Q W U O o J J ry In O c U 0 LLI 3 z W SHEET N0. E1.1 I 1 I I I ! 1 1 I I I I DUNDASROAD - _ � I 10" D.I.P. I NEW ACCESS 15R.C.P L: DRAINAGE AND �_ SAN MH NEW ACCESS UTILITY EASEMENT SAN MH I RIM ELEV.=960.04 1 RIM ELEV.=961.96 INV. ELEV.=943.7 (TYPICAL) INV. ELEV.=942.8 j I i (S 90000'00" E Plat) �15b0 T N 88°36,' 53 E 300.00 T �T~TT T T T »� »2-0. -» ---TEL. RISER20.00 - - - - - .6.0 »- Qp - `--------------------- 1 - -U TILI T\0 o 't 710.01 EASEM Er�1T I I o 9.0 o WHO q9 qq \w i - IN _ jj \ 19 Im DRAINAGE AND AND - ___-_-- UTILITY EASEMENT Q _ UTILITY EASEMENT it a_ (TYPICAL) (TYPI CAL)III it j 109 109 i II ; ;� 00 11 I 11; ! c� 11 I I o -- 10.0i- b - I �f- �d BUI L NG A �, - BUILDING B II 6,9 76 SF y --5.0 6,976 SF II i LOT 1 5.0- t LOT 2 II i I If 'i' j 23,100 SF 23,094 SF? s o - 1j X20.0-#; ; 6.0 0.53 AC 0.53 AC 10. I ---f-, 36.0- ,. 36.0 I I L_: I Hsi'---LIJE I I i II • i i � I i 1 1 15 0. 0 i f ! 150.0Fp i I If I I I o I I , MOW 11 i� 1 I I ii LINE !1 i; LOT 3 -y- LOT 4 11 i 20,400 SF o y --5.0 20,390 SF !� 0.47 AC 5.0- 0.47 AC _10.0i__ I 11 I • 10.0 - I- BUILDING C G BUILDING D II II '� 11 it C° 6,9 76 SF 6, 9 76 SF I' I i! II i I � I n 11 "d_ - WOj f7NCE 14-20.0- COIF JE +\- I i 6.0- o 9.9 i ON i;; n 109 - i T-35.9- I -� 6.0 _� 0.0 E 9 C3 36.0-'r-- n + i i A I ^� h 11 I I a 120.0: __ -1`- ---------- --- --'------------------------- -.1� ---------------- -- ------------- ------------- -- ---- ---,� I \\\ Wc�co !;' i! lO \ oo 0 jii O M 9.0 o cv) Ii I o N I CO O co II i ' t o N i i 150.0 0 14 11 • ; 11 1 i;% !; Q- 11 1 N) II I III IIOI \ o \ �l O O III i! I I , 1 Ij If ! it CHAINLINK ---� Io I II 109 �, 109 --j' io.j-- 11 i1 p i II i FENCE + ON LOT LINE. III i! 111 Q6 III II BUILDING F n -"110.0 -BUILDING E 11 i 6,976 SF 6,976 SF 11 II DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT (TYPICAL) 11 ill � 6, 976 SF 6,9 76 SF I 1` CHAINLINK 11 i1 Imo_, I! I FENCE +\-- ` 0.5 FT. WEST OF LOT LINE. CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER +\- 0.4 FT. WEST OF LOT CORNER - N 89°14'00" E -------------- ill C' i1. 01 --i*j 10.0 109 1 -36.0+H - A ~H I -20.0 --------------- --- - � � I -6.09. O :L0 0 m I_" ---M 0 W p LINE I I I I I ! I 1 I I I I I 0 00 I 1 I I I I I 1 I I I 1 I I 1 I I II ill j I � -5. 0 LOT 5 LOT 6 I I , 0 SF = 3.44 5.0-- F 20,400 SF 20, 384 SF I 6.0 26.0 I 1 r--120.0-rI i 116.0 I I I 0.47 AC 0.47 AC � 9.9 % ' 135.9- i l o ___-_--- I -�;j,1o.o � I : 0,, I DISTURBANCE AREA + I - � � 36.0 11 I '-t- I I - - �• ) U' .° a) 11 ! , • I + -- I I + ! ----- _-----_----_-_. ,o •pi ' ° o o.-.-.�r-.-L I i � I i i �-�---5.1 4, o o ] o +\ !I i 150.0 i i 149.9 X I^ _O T ' 11 i o �]� O Z I I I LOT 7 LOT 8 ! I 41 I j Qui 4� o 32,000 SF p -5.0 32,145 SF �!! i 0.73 AC 5.0~ 0.74 AC 1 11--i'1�0.0 - 11 BUILDING G BUILDING H s.s If 11 ill � 6, 976 SF 6,9 76 SF I 1` CHAINLINK 11 i1 Imo_, I! I FENCE +\-- ` 0.5 FT. WEST OF LOT LINE. CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER +\- 0.4 FT. WEST OF LOT CORNER - N 89°14'00" E -------------- ill C' i1. 01 --i*j 10.0 109 1 -36.0+H - A ~H I -20.0 --------------- --- - � � I -6.09. O :L0 0 m I_" ---M 0 W p LINE I I I I I ! I 1 I I I I I 0 00 I 1 I I I I I 1 I I I 1 I I 1 I I 0 0 0 DRAIN o AGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT (TYPICAL) it II II II II 5.2 +\- I- I� -- II II II II II II II 11 �I .I li 0 .I II II I o II II 11 0 ill ii n ii o i 0 STORM WATER DRAINAGE AND l MANAGEMENT UTILITY EASEMENT (TYPICAL) p U\'PL_I TY-- EASEMEN - ' o-----299.81 N e,9°14'00" E ---- o-------- /---------------- '00.0 Ov V ---- -- _ , `'�oo�oao$. 0 ��t �`��' -- 299.81, 149.8 I ° o°° LINE - m p A° �q' ��- m (300.02 Plat) ---SHED ' ° ° I S 9016' 45" '--CURB LANDSCAPE --EDGING/MULCH -- CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER + \- 5.8 FT. EAST OF LOT LINE 0-0- ,--- SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 14, T. 121, R. 25 N 89°14'00" E --- I ------1899.53 ------ ti _ ----------------------- `3�66 (N 89021'11" W Plat STOP -TEL. LANDSCAPE LANDSCAPE- / GOLDEN EAGLE ROAD ----CB IF RISER EDGING/MULCH EDGING/ROCK & SHRUBS F-------I------ i ! SAN MH ELEV. = 958.59 - r-- - - -- -- ` I I ! A r-� n 11- � A I � I- ELEV. = 958.16 _ _ \---SOUTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK (DOC.# 275353) AS MONUMENTED; ALSO NORTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF KLEIN FARMS ! 1 ESTATES 2ND ADDITION (DOC.# 753470) 1 I n I A nFj I -T-I n f\ iI r------ 7--- I i 0 30 60 90 Mimi GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET SURVEY DATA SURVEY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY: MEYER ROHLIN LAND SERVICES 708 1st AVENUE NE BUFFALO, MN 55313 DATED: APRIL 18, 2017 BENCHMARK: MN/DOT GEODETIC MONUMENT "8605 S" ELEVATION = 966.55 NAVD88 DATUM PROJECT LOCATION PART OF THE SWC AND NE4, SECTION 14 TOWNSHIP 121, RANGE 25, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA. EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 2, BLOCK 3, OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA. SITE DATA: EXISTING ZONING: PROPOSED ZONING: EXISTING PID: EXISTING LOT AREA: LOT 1 1: 1-2 HEAVY INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT 155-018-003020 191,832 SF = 4.40 ACRES PROPOSED BUILDING AREAS: 64x109 BUILDING 6,976 SF x 8 = 55,808 SF EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA 2,822 I � 0.06 Q PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA 0 SF = 3.44 ACRES >> 78.2% 0 147,210 I 1 3.38 I I I PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA 00 SF = i l o ___-_--- -a-CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER + \- DISTURBANCE AREA 5.1 FT. EAST OF LOT LINE SF = 4.60 � � d Z I Awa ° o how I a`�� ° U' .° a) o j�� s l ! ,c)"� c � ' ° o r/1 O o co0 i �-�---5.1 4, o o ] o +\ 0 0 0 DRAIN o AGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT (TYPICAL) it II II II II 5.2 +\- I- I� -- II II II II II II II 11 �I .I li 0 .I II II I o II II 11 0 ill ii n ii o i 0 STORM WATER DRAINAGE AND l MANAGEMENT UTILITY EASEMENT (TYPICAL) p U\'PL_I TY-- EASEMEN - ' o-----299.81 N e,9°14'00" E ---- o-------- /---------------- '00.0 Ov V ---- -- _ , `'�oo�oao$. 0 ��t �`��' -- 299.81, 149.8 I ° o°° LINE - m p A° �q' ��- m (300.02 Plat) ---SHED ' ° ° I S 9016' 45" '--CURB LANDSCAPE --EDGING/MULCH -- CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER + \- 5.8 FT. EAST OF LOT LINE 0-0- ,--- SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 14, T. 121, R. 25 N 89°14'00" E --- I ------1899.53 ------ ti _ ----------------------- `3�66 (N 89021'11" W Plat STOP -TEL. LANDSCAPE LANDSCAPE- / GOLDEN EAGLE ROAD ----CB IF RISER EDGING/MULCH EDGING/ROCK & SHRUBS F-------I------ i ! SAN MH ELEV. = 958.59 - r-- - - -- -- ` I I ! A r-� n 11- � A I � I- ELEV. = 958.16 _ _ \---SOUTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK (DOC.# 275353) AS MONUMENTED; ALSO NORTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF KLEIN FARMS ! 1 ESTATES 2ND ADDITION (DOC.# 753470) 1 I n I A nFj I -T-I n f\ iI r------ 7--- I i 0 30 60 90 Mimi GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET SURVEY DATA SURVEY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY: MEYER ROHLIN LAND SERVICES 708 1st AVENUE NE BUFFALO, MN 55313 DATED: APRIL 18, 2017 BENCHMARK: MN/DOT GEODETIC MONUMENT "8605 S" ELEVATION = 966.55 NAVD88 DATUM PROJECT LOCATION PART OF THE SWC AND NE4, SECTION 14 TOWNSHIP 121, RANGE 25, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA. EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 2, BLOCK 3, OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA. SITE DATA: EXISTING ZONING: PROPOSED ZONING: EXISTING PID: EXISTING LOT AREA: LOT 1 1: 1-2 HEAVY INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT 155-018-003020 191,832 SF = 4.40 ACRES PROPOSED BUILDING AREAS: 64x109 BUILDING 6,976 SF x 8 = 55,808 SF EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA 2,822 SF = 0.06 ACRES PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA 150,032 SF = 3.44 ACRES >> 78.2% NET IMPERVIOUS AREA INCREASE 147,210 SF = 3.38 ACRES PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA 41,800 SF = 0.96 ACRES >> 21.8 DISTURBANCE AREA 200,441 SF = 4.60 ACRES PARKING DATA: REQUIRED PARKING STALLS: OFFICE @ 1 /200sf; 10% x 55,808 sf / 200 = 28 SPACES WAREHOUSE © 1 /2,000sf; 90% x 55,808 sf / 2,000 = 25 SPACES Total= 53 SPACES PROVIDED PARKING STALLS: 9' x 20' SPACES = 90 SPACES (INCL 8 HC SPACES) SETBACK: 1-2 MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS LOCATION: BUILDING PARKING FRONT 30 6 INTERIOR SIDE 15 6 STREET SIDE 30 6 REAR YARD 15 6 L V cu W O N � cc GO M ,cu Q. O� 4) �•+ zto IGGGG ccz 6_ W y Usct 11iW C w p DGuam - O ctcr 0.O c O MINING cu LLW IGGGG co FILE NO. 00633 Preliminary Plat o c0 O 0 cco 1.2 j 1- I p C N � (� co N a CIO m I 42 Z I a`�� ° U' .° a) o j�� s l I 0 X I N fbca �oQ)N� c 4, o L/ft I^ 00o ' �]� O Z LC U p y 41 Qui 4� o ti co 3 - rr. FILE NO. 00633 Preliminary Plat O 0 cco ((O o � � CIO m o m W o FILE NO. 00633 Preliminary Plat I I I I DUNDAS ROAD I I _ 1 I I ' 10" D.I.P. I �� NEW ACCESS 0 ' ' =� 4 ` ' 15� R.C.P �i > DRAINAGE AND SAN MH °p '�T i NEW ACCESS o UTILITY EASEMENT SAN MH I RIM ELEV.-960.04 RIM ELEV.=961.96 I I i (TYPICAL) INV. ELEV.=942.8 INV. ELEV.=943.7 j i - (S 90000'00" E Plat) N 88036'53" E ►- " "-©- ; "� T T - -iv T T T T T 1- r20.0- + 15 b. O 300,00 T T T T T T T y / T T20` %- TEL. RISER -- •'b r `\ O �1 I � 10.0-- U TILI T 4y1 o EASEMENT o Q \ \ w III it • IN �I \ p p I \ _ 11 I DRAINAGE AND DRAINAGEAND i I r - ___- _-__ ___ -___- _ ---' __ _ . - r= -____ __ - -_ -__ E=__�=__ =- =_- ____ _ ___�_ ---- =_ =__-_ _�__. -,;1 �' I m UTILITY EASEMENT Q o° ''r S UTILITY EASEMENT (TYPICAL) I i 109 icn 1 _ (TYPICAL) f 109 cn I i I it I li O li I i1 - li ii 1 '• �O II I II ii I O 11 . I 0.01-- I �� I I ; BUILDING A �,; BUILDING BI� L0 6,9 76 SF 6,976 SF ill LOT 1 F --5.oLOT 2 III III 23,100 SF 5 0~ 23,094 SF i 6.0 1+20.0 -*1 0.53 AC -- 10. 3- r- i IIB 0 II' 0.53 AC y ? 36.0 36.0 •----LIJE } i L \'-- o I O ica II- i I I 1 cr_ I i I j co i 150.0 i 150.0 i © III i I i p i i l III I, I i r 1 II MOW I i i LINE i• ii LOT 3 -- LOT 4 ill 20,400 SF O y20i -5.0 ,390 SF I I �, � �----mow III !II 0.47 AC 5.0- 0.47 AC 1'0.0, I p LINE 10.0- BUILDING C BUILDING D II I III C° 6,9 76 SF 6,9 76 SF LI I1 ' I iII I i I I I I i I I ,WD F -NCE ;_20.0 ' -��1� 0S�\�F'+ 6.-1,'I- 0 9.9NNE 109 x35.90 109_+_41 6. . Q -- 3 6. 0__jJ A + I i I I 1., -II C) I+�20.o-I+I __ 1 -1`--------------- __'== _'___-� ALTA I NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY FOR KENNETH SPAETH I � r� i ol: `, h i - - 10" D.I.P. l i- \ ® 15" R.C.P. m a ro � �� P, o END OF { �N MH 00 i - - s � 0, 960 RIM ELEV.=960.04 ' SAN MH DUNDAS ROAD o L z 60 ono �O. ,CULVERT < o BURIED 960.0 959.90 INV. ELE)�.=942.8 RIM ELEV.=961.96 �� 961.11 / 960.66, , ��p D - ' I 6 ) ( - ) ( ) ` 959.79 i i INV. ELEV.=943.7 °� _ _ _ - - ( - 960-(S 90°00 00 E Plat) _ ". _ x 958.6 _ - -959- - - i - -961- 1�1 X 9.7 959.2X N 88°36 53 E 9 - '�C 959.31 T - T- cv - i 960.6 X� --fi T T T 300. �0� - S9 �T� -I�� q5n_ EL. RISER - -� I- - - - - - - , L -0-961- -- - - - - X_-- ---o -962----�- 961.9 6� � X - X - `� X961.5 962.1 962.9__`- __--�C-- - -- - -_ _ rt� - ---�--J�61.5 0,`� i 962.5- 962.4 24" CMP -962- _ I\� '-UTILITY CULVERT \- --96,3- EASEMENT- - - - - _ DRIVEWAY 963.0 X 962.9 ` _ X 963. f-_ ACCESS TO X 962.5 1 0 962. 9 962.8X Q 9\ --MOW -963- - - PUBLIC STREET 962.3xI LINE °D cl� c I Q X962.2 -_// \ I T T o X962.2 X963.5 X 961.9 X61.9 l 962.5 / 963.1 X � o / ` 1 1 X 964.2 r - \g ` / 1 \ I X \ U 19 X 961.9 / 962.0 X 961.3 X 96�>Q 5 \ � \ I N �� Mow \ \ I 0963.7 X it X 961.5 96.5X i X \9B11 BX 963.7 �� 964.3 h �o �I X 961.2 � X 962.5 X 961.7 II \ l MOW -,I LINE I \ I I I LEGEND -T UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE SANITARY SEWER STORM SEWER WA TERMAIN \, ❑ ❑ X 961.7 / rX961.0 X 961.0 i` -MOW LINE I \ j C 62.0II II 964.5 X�96�\ i X 960" X 950. ? U' X g63 963.9 I --WOOD FENCE w I 964.4 I I ��' CORNER .1(� ❑ -962.5 ON LOT LINE X 961.7 - X 961.5IX 60.4 I I I I 96� -950- •� I \ X 960.7 �X 960.5' X959.6 X 963.8 - - - -952- PILE OF BRUSH/SMALLTREES (RECENTLY �\ o� x 961.1 �� X 59.5 6�• p Imo•• \ / / CLEARED FROM SITE) Xc�° I 19 0 o �o X 962.3 I 9� 9. ( X 963.8 o f I 9ze, 1.4 co \CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER +\- ❑ o �l I - Z I �� ^ 5.1 FT. EAST OF LOT LINE I 59.0 \ \ \ 963.4X / X 962.7 I / (APPROX.) I o 961.3 960.9 �I a' = \ 962.4 Il CHAINLINK -y= 962.5 X 961.8\� / 961.2/ } W o\ \ \\ FENCE +\- / "i' ; Qo ON LOT LINE. ^^ < \ / o 4 p1 \ ID 960.5 960.9• i �Q \o 1/ SANITARY MANHOLE CATCH BASIN HYDRANT GATE VALVE WATER SHUTOFF 0 - CHAIN LINK FENCE ❑ WOOD FENCE DECIDUOUS TREE CONIFEROUS TREE SHRUB INDEX CONTOUR - - - INTERMEDIATE CONTOUR SPOT ELEVATION CUL VERT TELEPHONE RISER POWER BOX SIGN BI TUMINOUS SURFACE �00 7°0000 Lur o°°?o0 °0°�°° o LANDSCAPED AREA X 60.4 / i I L------------� X961.8 X961.5 / J X960.9-5.1\-� I-----------� \ / I TILLED GARDEN X 962.6 v ` � \ K 960.8 / / \961 1 X 958.7 -a- � a o CONCRETE SURFACE o \ / \ \ � o 1 961.4 X X 961.3 9611.4 962.5 X 962.5 \ CONCRETE-- o \ 1 \ SURFACE (APPROX.) / 1X 959.9 \ X 961.0 \ 961.3 a o X 962.7 \ \ -y +\- CHAINLINK -y X 962.3 BROKEN \ o % FENCE + \- CONCRETE-- X 962.3 X961.3 -5.f \ X 960.7 0.5 FT. WEST PIECE OF LOT LINE. \- `J \ 961.5 0 \ X 961.7 X962.4 I r- 962.5 �.,,, �-MOW I � CONCRETE-. I ',---�.�\ �\ 11 LINE I 962.6X 962 9 SURFACE ��X\ (APPROX.) 0 �i i c) �� o � 962.6MOWi i Q 1 -- � r LANDSCAPE \\�\��/ ��v a r°/� ),-962 .0-+ II LINE i i QO _\ 9/�'�,-EDGING/MULCH NER X�'6� CONCRETE�E�� _ ,,,,-'�/ / y\ 962.2._ _96 X gs g \\��`--- 1\`> 1 O' i 5.8AI FT.NK FENCE EAST OF LOT LINE + \ EAST QUARTER CORNER OF--\ -- QUARTER CORNER OF 967'2 x- °` �\ � , PIECE ----- I / `� ,' A 9 SECTION 14, T. 121, R. 25 SECTION 14, T. 121, R. 25 IF i M 0 W E� /AREA RE r��96�' -SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEASTFOUND WRIGHT COUNTY MONUMENT) -963- - 1 --------------------- ------------- Y 962.3 1/4 OF SECTION 14, T. 121, R. 25(CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER +\- Spj E D�i(FOUND P.K. NAIL) `O UTILITY--.` N��FR GARDEN i M 0 W 961.8 c ~ I N 89'14'00" E 0.4 FT. WEST OF LOT CORNER i � 1 \ N 89'14'00" E r °� EASEMENT �` + _ i yFgp, X 963.4 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ i �- _ --- 3123.56--- --ti , - _ - - -E - -� � - � - -�- � --1899.53--- __- - �,� -299.81 N 9'14 00' E--- 962.6 ---- 3123.56--- 964.2X rc --- o +��-_ �- _ - -� y-96711 Uo'er 961.3 963.7X°"°o299.8--- _g61 40°°°° 9 `S� i3 �\ SHED 962_ o °o LINE - 960 TC 958.96 -� -(300.02 Plat)- -�� _ i X 96 �g61 f �r X960" X 960.2 Ticket Check Status Ticket Number: 170740852 As of 3/21/17 13:15 CDT, participating facility owners have responded to Ticket Check as follows: Company Name Typesy Status Time Comments TDS TELECOM - Marked 03/16/17 BRDGWT01 9:06 AM CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS - TV,FO CHACAB03 Not yet 03/15/17 responded 1:18 PM CITY OF MONTICELLO/FIBERNET E,FO,S,W Non- �� 9S9\x�h (SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN S 89016 45 -CU " � STOP 960.5 x' 960.5 I - �-TEL. -LANDSCAPE CENTER POINT ENERGY Clear/No 03/21/17 �G X i ( N 89°21' 11 Wx Plat \ Clear/No r RISER EDGING/MULCH G GAS - NNGAS03 conflict 8:30 AM LANDSCAPE -' GOLDEN EAGLE ROAD �,� °' �- GB LEV.=958.16-SOUTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL _ - EDGING/ROCK & SHRUBS SAN MH PARK (DL AS LSO 4 X NORTH NE#OF7THE3PLAT OF KLEIN FARMS ELEV.=958.59-- 958.7 ESTATES 2ND ADDITION (DOC.# 753470) T - L - �� I I I �_r I I I �- L [-F-r- ��1 12A - II r- I n I r- A ) A . T A X A n I T I r 4_ L_ I I V I I /-\ I\ I V I/-\ I I L_ I 1 I Ticket Check Status Ticket Number: 170740852 As of 3/21/17 13:15 CDT, participating facility owners have responded to Ticket Check as follows: Company Name Typesy Status Time Comments TDS TELECOM - Marked 03/16/17 BRDGWT01 9:06 AM CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS - TV,FO CHACAB03 Not yet 03/15/17 responded 1:18 PM CITY OF MONTICELLO/FIBERNET E,FO,S,W Non- 03/16/17 (SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN - CMTCLO01 Excavation 11:23 AM AS -BUILT PLANS PROVIDED) CENTER POINT ENERGY Clear/No 03/21/17 G - MINGASO4 conflict 11:25 AM Clear gas and power. NORTHERN NATURAL Clear/No 03/16/17 G GAS - NNGAS03 conflict 8:30 AM XCEL ENERGY - XCEL01 N:\Land Projects\17168 - Spaeth\dwg\17168.dwg Clear/No 03/21/17 conflict 11:26 AM PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Lot 2, Block 3, OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK, according to the recorded plat thereof, Wright County, Minnesota. PARCEL IDS#: 155-018-003020 SURVEYORS NOTES: 1. Matters of record are shown according to Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company Commitment for Title Insurance issued by Preferred Title, Inc., Order Number: 6321428, Reference Number: 04001-17, Effective Date April 04, 2017. 2. Gross land area=4.40 acres 3. Underground utilities are shown according to ground markings per Gopher State One Call Ticket Number 170740852 (non -excavation request). Meyer-Rohlin Land Services is not responsible for utilities that were not marked on the ground. Location of underground utilities must be verified prior to any excavation by contacting Gopher State One Call @ 651-454-0002 or gopherstateonecoi/.org. See "Ticket Check Status" on this drawing for list of utilities & response to ticket provided by Gopher State One Call. 4. Project Benchmark: Mn/Dot Geodetic Monument "8605 S" Elev. 966.55 (NA VD88 Datum) 5. Bearing orientation is based Wright County Coordinate System, NAD 83 Datum (86 Adjustment). 6. Rights of Way, easements, and servitudes listed in Schedule B, Section 2 of the Commitment for Title Insurance (refer to Note #1): Exception 9. - Utility easements as shown on the recorded plat of Oakwood Industrial Park are indicated on this drawing. 0 40 80 120 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET O DENOTES IRON MONUMENT SET • DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND DENOTES CAST-IRON MONUMENT FOUND DENOTES P.K. NAIL FOUND To Kenneth J. Spaeth and Theresa L. Spaeth, and Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company. This is to certify that this map or plat and the survey on which it is based were made in accordance with the 2016 Minimum Standard Detail Requirements for ALTA/NSPS Land Title Surveys, jointly established and adopted by ALTA and NSPS, and includes items 1, 4, 5, 8, 11 of Table A thereof. The fieldwork was completed between March 22 and April 5, 2017. Date: April 18, 201177 Abram A. Niemela License No.` 48664 „ Iil" IIIIIIIIII1111111IIIIli REVISIONS SERVICES 708 1 ST AVENUE NE, 41 BUFFALO, MN 55313 DATE 0411 8I 17 PH. 763.682.1781 WWW.MEYERROHLIN.GOM DRAWN BY BOOK 387 SHEET 1 OF FILE NO. AAN PAGE 40 1 SHEETS 17168 I I . 10" D.I.P. - II— I 1 o S ► � ► ► ► ► ► 15 R. C. P.00 ► ► s ► ► ► s ► s �; ► SAN SAN MH RIME liadl�elfil iif -� o- �� I .= E �O iiVl/. tLtV.=9, INV. ELEV.=943.7 —� Iy---�- T T T T T T T T T 52�� I!• I+ T�T T T T T T T T T � T —T-----IT`� � �_--TEL. RISER -� w—x-- -- --- -----� --- -- I — -- -• - ---=---------- ""-_,-'"�___--ter------------==---------=----------=---- - � - ----------- ----� I '"UTILITY { EASEMENT T - -- I +rv10 VA \ '� I \ � I ; i O JI I II I I CE 11 I I I I I -I N = - ---- -- - - - --- _- _-_ -__ -___ = --�J \ I� ' ------------ ---- ---- -- - L m 111 T 1, P'1 I� �. Q. a \ I I =- 109 - '! �` I I. 109 , DUNDAS ROAD - I II I II 1, II I , , • II �I I IT LLJ 1; BUILDING A BUILDING B o II I CO 6,976 SF 6,9 76 SF it I FFE=963.50 FFE=963.50 II I, , I . I ' y u u u U-O'O-O"O �p..OvO.:Oupupu0 7/�� II 0 0 OBD O_e_n OeOn0�0,�0„O„O„O- o o e e 0 a a 0 a a 0 0 0 o�eOnOnO�O,�0e0 O O_O_o_on a _-- --- ; 'E'�_ - O I _ f I _ 1; I m I I r—.—��—�—�—�—�—�—�—�—�—�—� I 1, • II !1i mew _L i, L�I I • i I I I � • � ' i ' 1 --- ., v u U 0 U"O"O"O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 g O O.O.O. n o I I; • �%' O�O�o°o Oe O�O,u,O,°O�0�0�00 000°O°On0 O O O O_O.O.O.n n n ^p s O O"O"O O O"O�O�O�O�O�0�0�00�0�00p0pap MOW LINE I 1 II 1 1 I II I j it I i 1 it It --MOW I� I LINE !I • I BUILDING C BUILDING D C° 6, 9 76 SF 6,976 SF I li 11 I I iI I I � 11 I it I .I 01_ F -NCE FFE=963.50 FFE=963.50 I ,IEP. +Uj ' II 1 L-07 LINE 109 109 'I • ' ' I Q a I 1 a 1 0 �' • I--------------------- ---------'•---------------"-- ---- f III ;lO �Qp I I 1 Il \ 1 \ o 0 CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER + \- - __, - 1'I \ \19 II � I 5.1 FT. EAST OF LOT LINE II I I�1 Ii0 \ \ SII I I' I ---- ---- I -------------- _ - r l I I I �LL _�-yr------ =-- =-- — = = �____�___ �____-=_==—=-y-c �r------- -----� rl • n a I i a I I o CHAINLINK ---� 1 109 109 ;' FENCE + \- ' °I II ON LOT LINE. III III I I III I I II -I I%• p -II BUILDING E BUILDING F 6,976 SF 6,9 76 SF ' II III o II it FFE=963.50 FFE=963.50 I I O II / ., u u o-o•;vTa,.o"o"o'"o`''o"o"o°o°o°o°ol°o°o°o°o°o�o°noeo„ono„o„o-o_o_o_p I u u u o-o-o-o-O"o"o'"o"'o'"o"0�o�o4oQo°o°o°o°o°o°oopopo„ono4o„ _. _o_o_o_o n n e n �i°o°epn°no„O„o„o„o_o_o_�,_o n • ^�..:� j I I I • _ I i - // I II I f/ I ISI I I . I II O I 1 • _ � : I I v -o 0 0 0 0 0 ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O"O 0 0 0 0 . e n n n �\ O O--O--°O p p`/Ou0u0U0°O°O°O°00"O`'O O�J°� 0 0 0 0 0 0 \ I II ?00-09 O O�OeO,,,�O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i 1 .O.n n 1 I I_ II I ii 0 I I II 1 li 1 II I II II II I I „ o BUILDING G y BUILDING H I I• 6,976 SF 6,9 76 SF -- 5.2 + \- CHAINLINK---� 1� FENCE + - - - ° 'I II \ ! li' FFE-963.50 FFE=963.50 i' 0.5 FT. WEST II= II OF LOT LINE. I1 I' 109 109 1" II II I, II n �• 1 I II %�-----------------------------------'----------------- ----,, ---- --- I I 11 1 r 17 �------ I I II \ II �II i� 11 I p O - s Dpi dad k�e � fiti¢ig YI�III I � ; , ------ ------- ---------------------------_w ------• -------- ----------_S�1.L -- --- O \ ° LANDSCAPE \ ---EDGING/MULCH --CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER + \- 5.8 FT. EAST OF LOT LINE I , 1 , I , 1 , CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER +\- °moo o- ;---SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST 0.4 FT. WEST OF LOT CORNER 1/4 OF SECTION 14, T. 121, R. 25 N 89 °14'00" E \I EASEMENT i i „ ------3123.56----- --- ` -----------1 N _ i ---------------------------------- N 89°14 00 E --------------------t-------- ---- o ----- 299.81 N (; 9 °14'ff E -------------i ----- ----- -_ �----- o ----------- 1899.53 - — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — ��, n. w\ n �. _� n fy 3 , '°oo°od°o°\`°MOW ° o so '° o .LINE l e � SHED s .J ('--CURB I' STOP -TEL. LANDSCAPE RISER EDGING/MULCH LANDSCAPE— EDGING/ROCK GOLDEN EAGLE ROAD CB \ ELEV.=958.16_ _ _SOUTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL & SHRUBS SAN MH i PARK (DOC.# 275353) AS MONUMENTED; ALSO -I r- ELEV.=958.59NORTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF KLEIN FARMS I ESTATES 2ND ADDITION (DOC.# 753470) I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 l i g r— � �� 1 r— n n n -T– n l -T- r— r-- � n l r� i � n rte► I� I � n l l I I 0 30 60 90 I GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET SURVEY DATA SURVEY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY: MEYER ROHLIN LAND SERVICES 708 1st AVENUE NE BUFFALO, MN 55313 DATED: APRIL 18, 2017 BENCHMARK: MN/DOT GEODETIC MONUMENT "8605 S" ELEVATION = 966.55 NAVD88 DATUM PROJECT LOCATION PART OF THE SW4 AND NE4, SECTION 14 TOWNSHIP 121, RANGE 25, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA. EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 2, BLOCK 3, OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA. 49 1 F7 I ").0L� 17.083 -4.829' Oshkosh TI -3000 Aircraft Rescue * Flreflgghtinq Vehicle Overall Lenqqth 39. 1 G7ft Overall Width I 0.000ft Overall Body Netght 1 1.83 1 ft Min Body Ground -"Clearance I .G 12ft Track Width 9.583ft Lock -to -lock time 4.005 Wall to Wall Turning Radius 50.033ft M�Lo ,, L V ca W O N M ,CU Q. O� 4) mmftLos 1"'Ift cc z �•+ z z `� CL � W Us Z w c 0 W�- - > �= w� O p gym♦ � � _V 6 CL O O `J ICU W co 2 0 FILE NO. 00633 Fire Truck Circulation Plan O 1.2 ' L •h co C� I o � � co N . W W '')cOLO 1 o c Z 110) U � •p ~I � �AImO ' � x I N �__ y H q s W m CZL Q Lij , y ,QO 003 A) w Q V J 0y 1 I 4� o ti 3 t rr. FILE NO. 00633 Fire Truck Circulation Plan O 0 co o � � � m m m W Q ti Q Q O O Q V FILE NO. 00633 Fire Truck Circulation Plan EXISTING — -� -HYDRANT 00 SAN MH I RIM ELEV.=961.96 INV. ELEV.=943.7 R=100 R=200 R= 300 R=300 R=200 I ----------------- FENCE + \- 0.5 FT. WEST OF LOT LINE. PROPOSED---_ HYDRANT CHAINL K FENCE CORNER +\- \1 0.4 \- 0.4 FT. WEST OF LOT CORNER ---,\ U)RLITY- N 89°14'00 E EASEMEN ------3123.56-- ----------- ----------------<------------ MOW LINE a LANDSCAPE EDGING/ROCK & SHRUBS r -- — — — — — I------� I I I I �----- 299.81 N � 9�0"�E------ ^ GOLDEN EAGLE ROAD SAN MH ELEV. = 958 r -- — — — — — I ----- I I I I I EXISTING HYDRANT I I SAN MH RIM ELEV.=960.04 INV. ELEV.=942.8 TEL. RISER R=100 NCE CORNER + \- OF LOT LINE r,- LI NCE CORNERAS OF LOT LINE --- SOUTI'""-IORTHEAST 1/4 0 R=300 -. 121, R. 25 N 89°14'00" E ------1899.53----- - — — — — — — — — — — — — -TEL LANDSCAPE RI R EDGING/MULCH 5.16-- --_SOUTH LIN OF THE PLAT OF OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL _ PARK (DO .# 275353) AS MONUMENTED; ALSO NORTH LI E OF THE PLAT OF KLEIN FARMS ESTATES 2NDADDITION (DOC.# 753470) I I I I I I I I I I n I n n IF h► I �I 0 30 60 90 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET SURVEY DATA SURVEY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY: MEYER ROHLIN LAND SERVICES 708 1st AVENUE NE BUFFALO, MN 55313 DATED: APRIL 18, 2017 BENCHMARK: MN/DOT GEODETIC MONUMENT "8605 S" ELEVATION = 966.55 NAVD88 DATUM PROJECT LOCATION PART OF THE SW4 AND NE4, SECTION 14 TOWNSHIP 121, RANGE 25, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA. EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 2, BLOCK 3, OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA. N 0�60 ,,two a co V 5 W o O N I (n co N %momoC �'Li V' M c Z Q. o 4) ,cu � � Ox I N I m �- y � H W m (o `12 a�Q-_ S_ Q Q� y W Us y w N a I y Zo +. JIS U 1 p ww or O I Room �o 10 4� o ti cu W o~ 0 c a a 5 Ia� o o C � I (n co N . L �'Li V' � (D U) o c Z I a�� U � •p 01 ~I � A � � Ox I N I m �- y � H W m (o `12 a�Q-_ S_ Q WQ_�ai3 y o y w N a I y Zo +. JIS U 1 I an 4� o ti 3 t rr. FILE N0. 00633 -1 /_1 Fire Hydran t Coverage Plan o � � m m o m W o ti Q v 0 o a FILE N0. 00633 -1 /_1 Fire Hydran t Coverage Plan Spaeth Industrial Park Site Improvement Project 107Dundas Road Monticello, MN DRAINAGE ANALYSIS Prepared for: Ken Spaeth 108 Meadowlake Road SE St. Michael, MN 55376 Phone: (612) 889-3100 spaethmasonry@gmail.com Prepared bv: Civil Engineering Site Design Attn: Scott Dahlke PO Box 566 118 East Broadway Street Monticello, MN 55362 Phone: (763) 314-0929 sdahlke@civilesd.com May 08, 2017 CESD Project # 00633 TABLE OF CONTENTS Narrative o Proposed Project o Site Location o Requirements o Rate Calculations o Existing Site Conditions o Proposed Site Conditions o Volume Abstraction and Water Quality Calculations o Soils Data o Summary o Certification Appendix A — Existing Conditions Drainage Calculations o Existing Conditions Drainage Area Map o 2 -Year (2.81 -Inch), 24 -Hour Event o 10 -Year (4.18 -Inch), 24 -Hour Event o 100 -Year (6.93 -Inch), 24 -Hour Event Appendix B — Proposed Condition Drainage Calculations o Proposed Conditions Drainage Area Map o 2 -Year (2.81 -Inch), 24 -Hour Event o 10 -Year (4.18 -Inch), 24 -Hour Event o 100 -Year (6.93 -Inch), 24 -Hour Event Appendix C — Volume Abstraction 1.0" Rainfall on New Impervious Surface o Infiltration Worksheet o Stage -Storage Containment Volume Appendix D — Soils Data o Soils Data per Web Soil Survey Spaeth Industrial Park, Monticello, MN Drainage Analysis Page 2 NARRATIVE PROPOSED PROJECT: The project proposes site improvements for multiple small industrial buildings. Site improvements include new buildings, pavement, utilities, and associated items. The project proposes collection of impervious surface drainage with storm sewer configured to function as an underground infiltration system with overflow storm water routed to existing roadside ditch of Dundas Road. SITE LOCATION: The site address is 107 Dundas Road in the City of Monticello, MN. The project is in the SW 1/4 of the NE1/4, Section 14, Township 121, Range 25, Wright County, MN. Access to the site can be achieved from Dundas Road along the north boundary. REQUIREMENTS: Stormwater management design for the project is subject to review by the Monticello. Stormwater requirements for the project as received from City staff are as follows: This property falls within a subwatershed that discharges to a regional pond to the northeast. The regional pond was designed in the City's Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan and assumes a CN equal to 80 for the proposed Mini - Storage parcel. Any modeling and/or proposed design should demonstrate that a CN equal to 80 is not exceeded. Infiltration will also be required for the proposed project. RATE CALCULATIONS: The storm water runoff and calculations of this report are based on Nationwide Urban Runoff Program (NURP) and the Soil Conservation Service Synthetic Unit Hydrograph Method incorporated into the software program HydroCad 10.0. Rainfall precipitation depths used in calculations are current NOAA Atlas 14 Point Precipitation Frequency Estimates for Monticello, Minnesota for the 2 -Year (2.81 -inch), 10 -Year (4.18 -inch) and 100 -Year (6.93 -inch) rainfall events. EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS: The existing site is vacant property that has been designated as industrial development property. Most of the existing site has grass turf coverage. Small areas of concrete pavement exist at various locations at the site remaining from previous industrial site activity. Existing storm water runoff for the site is primarily directed by natural topography to adjacent property to the east, small areas of runoff drains north to Dundas Road ditch, and a small area drains south to adjacent property. Existing Conditions Drainage Area Map and associated HydroCAD Analysis calculation model printouts can be found in attached Appendix A. The flow rates from the existing site are summarized in the table below: Spaeth Industrial Park, Monticello, MN Drainage Analysis Page 3 EXISTING FLOW RATES DISCHARGING OFFSITE 2 -Year (2.81") Runoff 10 -Year (4.18") 100 -Year (6.93") Rate (cfs) Runoff Rate (cfs) Runoff Rate (cfs) TOTAL EXISTING 0.03 0.61 6.59 CONDITION PROPOSED SITE CONDITIONS: The site is proposed to be improved with multiple buildings, pavement, utilities, and associated site improvements. Storm water improvements for the project are needed to limit rate control to Existing Conditions discharge rates, and provide volume control for water quality requirements. The project proposes collection of impervious surface drainage with storm sewer configured to function as an underground infiltration system. A surface infiltration basin is provided at the south end of the development and is connected to the storm sewer system. The infiltration basin provides additional storm water storage volume and additional system infiltration capacity. Storm water overflow is routed to Dundas Road ditch at the north east corner of the site. Proposed Conditions Drainage Area Map and associated HydroCAD Analysis calculation model printouts can be found in attached Appendix B. The flow rates from the proposed site are summarized in the table below: Total Proposed Conditions PROPOSED FLOW RATES DISCHARGING OFFSITE 2 -Year (2.81") Runoff Rate (cfs) 0.04 10 -Year (4.18") Runoff Rate (cfs) 0.12 VOLUME ABSTRACTION AND WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS: 100 -Year (6.93") Runoff Rate (cfs) 4.03 Volume abstraction is required to be provided for 1.1" rainfall on new impervious surface. Storm water system improvements are to incorporate infiltration ability with volume and capacity necessary to satisfy this requirement. The existing site impervious surface is 2,822 sf. The proposed site impervious surface is 150,032 sf. The resulting net impervious surface increase is then 150,032 — 2,822 = 147,210 sf. The project proposes collection of storm water runoff into a storm sewer system with perforated pipe and an outlet control structure with an elevated discharge outlet pipe. The elevated discharge outlet pipe provides containment of storm water volume within the system and allows infiltration of storm water into natural granular soils at the site. Pretreatment of storm water runoff within the system is provided by sumps incorporated into catch basins that collect runoff into the system. Infiltration Worksheet and Stage -Storage containment volume data printouts can be found in Attached Appendix C. The following table summarizes the calculation of required and proposed infiltration volumes: Spaeth Industrial Park, Monticello, MN Drainage Analysis Page 4 VOLUME ABSTRACTION 1.1" INFILTRATION Item New Impervious 1.1" Runoff 48 hr System Storage Surface Area Volume Infiltration Volume Below (sf) Required Volume Outlet (cf) Capacity (cf) (cf) Underground 147,210 13,494 45,523 35,993 Infiltration System Since abstraction of 1.1" rainfall on new impervious surface is achieved, City of Monticello standards for water quality are also achieved. SOILS DATA: Soils in the project area are understood to be hydrologic Group A soil based on available soil data provided web soil survey for the project site. Type A soils at the site allow for an infiltration rate of 0.8 in/hr allowed by the MPCA Minnesota Storm Water Manual. Soils data for the site as obtained to date can be found in attached Appendix D. SUMMARY: The calculations show that the proposed design provides reduced stormwater runoff flow rates, achieves required volume control, and required water quality control for the proposed condition. The project improvements and drainage analysis satisfy the City of Monticello requirements for storm water management. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Scott Dahlke, P.E. Reg. No. 24348 Spaeth Industrial Park, Monticello, MN Drainage Analysis 05/08/2017 Date Page 5 APPENDIX A Existing Conditions Drainage Calculations Spaeth Industrial Park, Monticello, MN Drainage Analysis (S3) Ex Cond Onsite Ex Cond Onsite Draining East S2 Ex Cond Offsite Draining East to Area S1 North Ex Cond Onsite Draining South Ital Project SubCat Reach on Link Routing Diagram for 00633 Ex Cond Prepared by Hewlett-Packard, Printed 4/18/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 01607 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Spaeth Industrial Park, Monticello, MN 00633 Ex Cond MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81 " Prepared by Hewlett-Packard Printed 4/18/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 01607 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 2 Summary for Subcatchment S1: Ex Cond Onsite Draining East Runoff = 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0 cf, Depth= 0.00" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81" Area (sf) CN Description 2,822 98 Impervious, HSG A 174,456 39 Pervious, HSG A 177,278 40 Weighted Average 174,456 98.41 % Pervious Area 2,822 1.59% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 20.0 Direct Entry, User Defined Summary for Subcatchment S2: Ex Cond Offsite Draining East to Area S1 Runoff = 0.03 cfs @ 13.36 hrs, Volume= 576 cf, Depth= 0.06" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81" Area (sf) CN Description 20,886 98 Impervious, HSG A 93,042 39 Pervious, HSG A 113,928 50 Weighted Average 93,042 81.67% Pervious Area 20,886 18.33% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 20.0 Direct Entry, User Defined Summary for Subcatchment S3: Ex Cond Onsite Draining North Runoff = 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0 cf, Depth= 0.00" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81" Area (sf) CN Description 0 98 Impervious, HSG A 11,215 39 Pervious, HSG A 11,215 39 Weighted Average 11,215 100.00% Pervious Area Spaeth Industrial Park, Monticello, MN 00633 Ex Cond MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81 " Prepared by Hewlett-Packard Printed 4/18/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 01607 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 3 Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, User Defined Summary for Subcatchment S4: Ex Cond Onsite Draining South Runoff = 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0 cf, Depth= 0.00" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81" Area (sf) CN Description 0 98 Impervious, HSG A 3,336 39 Pervious, HSG A 3,336 39 Weighted Average 3,336 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, User Defined Summary for Reach 1 R: Total Project Inflow Area = 305,757 sf, 7.75% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.02" for 2 -Year event Inflow = 0.03 cfs @ 13.36 hrs, Volume= 576 cf Outflow = 0.03 cfs @ 13.36 hrs, Volume= 576 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Spaeth Industrial Park, Monticello, MN 00633 Ex Cond MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" Prepared by Hewlett-Packard Printed 4/18/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 01607 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 4 Summary for Subcatchment S1: Ex Cond Onsite Draining East Runoff = 0.07 cfs @ 13.38 hrs, Volume= 1,271 cf, Depth= 0.09" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" Area (sf) CN Description 2,822 98 Impervious, HSG A 174,456 39 Pervious, HSG A 177,278 40 Weighted Average 174,456 98.41 % Pervious Area 2,822 1.59% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 20.0 Direct Entry, User Defined Summary for Subcatchment S2: Ex Cond Offsite Draining East to Area S1 Runoff = 0.61 cfs @ 12.43 hrs, Volume= 3,704 cf, Depth= 0.39" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" Area (sf) CN Description 20,886 98 Impervious, HSG A 93,042 39 Pervious, HSG A 113,928 50 Weighted Average 93,042 81.67% Pervious Area 20,886 18.33% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 20.0 Direct Entry, User Defined Summary for Subcatchment S3: Ex Cond Onsite Draining North Runoff = 0.00 cfs @ 13.26 hrs, Volume= 62 cf, Depth= 0.07" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" Area (sf) CN Description 0 98 Impervious, HSG A 11,215 39 Pervious, HSG A 11,215 39 Weighted Average 11,215 100.00% Pervious Area Spaeth Industrial Park, Monticello, MN 00633 Ex Cond MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" Prepared by Hewlett-Packard Printed 4/18/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 01607 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 5 Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, User Defined Summary for Subcatchment S4: Ex Cond Onsite Draining South Runoff = 0.00 cfs @ 13.26 hrs, Volume= 18 cf, Depth= 0.07" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" Area (sf) CN Description 0 98 Impervious, HSG A 3,336 39 Pervious, HSG A 3,336 39 Weighted Average 3,336 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, User Defined Summary for Reach 1 R: Total Project Inflow Area = 305,757 sf, 7.75% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.20" for 10 -Year event Inflow = 0.61 cfs @ 12.43 hrs, Volume= 5,056 cf Outflow = 0.61 cfs @ 12.43 hrs, Volume= 5,056 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Spaeth Industrial Park, Monticello, MN 00633 Ex Cond MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Prepared by Hewlett-Packard Printed 4/18/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 01607 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 6 Summary for Subcatchment S1: Ex Cond Onsite Draining East Runoff = 2.34 cfs @ 12.39 hrs, Volume= 12,053 cf, Depth= 0.82" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Area (sf) CN Description 2,822 98 Impervious, HSG A 174,456 39 Pervious, HSG A 177,278 40 Weighted Average 174,456 98.41 % Pervious Area 2,822 1.59% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 20.0 Direct Entry, User Defined Summary for Subcatchment S2: Ex Cond Offsite Draining East to Area S1 Runoff = 4.19 cfs @ 12.33 hrs, Volume= 15,456 cf, Depth= 1.63" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Area (sf) CN Description 20,886 98 Impervious, HSG A 93,042 39 Pervious, HSG A 113,928 50 Weighted Average 93,042 81.67% Pervious Area 20,886 18.33% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 20.0 Direct Entry, User Defined Summary for Subcatchment S3: Ex Cond Onsite Draining North Runoff = 0.23 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 695 cf, Depth= 0.74" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Area (sf) CN Description 0 98 Impervious, HSG A 11,215 39 Pervious, HSG A 11,215 39 Weighted Average 11,215 100.00% Pervious Area Spaeth Industrial Park, Monticello, MN 00633 Ex Cond MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Prepared by Hewlett-Packard Printed 4/18/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 01607 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 7 Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, User Defined Summary for Subcatchment S4: Ex Cond Onsite Draining South Runoff = 0.07 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 207 cf, Depth= 0.74" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Area (sf) CN Description 0 98 Impervious, HSG A 3,336 39 Pervious, HSG A 3,336 39 Weighted Average 3,336 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, User Defined Summary for Reach 1 R: Total Project Inflow Area = 305,757 sf, 7.75% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.12" for 100 -Year event Inflow = 6.59 cfs @ 12.35 hrs, Volume= 28,410 cf Outflow = 6.59 cfs @ 12.35 hrs, Volume= 28,410 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs APPENDIX B Proposed Conditions Drainage Calculations Spaeth Industrial Park, Monticello, MN Drainage Analysis (S3) Pro Cond Oi Draining Ni S1 Pro Cond Onsite to System P 1 Under Ground System and Basin S2 Ex Cond Offsite Draining East to Area S1 Pro Cond Onsite Draining South I Pro Cond Onsite Draining East Project Subcat Reach on Link Routing Diagram for 00633 Pro Cond Prepared by CESD HydroCADO 10.00-18 s/n 01607 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Spaeth Ind Park, Monticello, MN 00633 Pro Cond MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81 " Prepared by CESD HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 01607 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 2 Summary for Subcatchment S1: Pro Cond Onsite to System Runoff = 7.51 cfs @ 12.29 hrs, Volume= 24,285 cf, Depth= 1.57" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81" Area (sf) CN Description 148,981 98 Impervious, HSG A 29,704 39 Pervious, >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 6,422 49 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG A 185,107 87 Weighted Average 36,126 20.0 19.52% Pervious Area 148,981 80.48% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 20.0 Direct Entry, User Defined Summary for Subcatchment S2: Ex Cond Offsite Draining East to Area S1 Runoff = 0.03 cfs @ 13.36 hrs, Volume= 576 cf, Depth= 0.06" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81" Area (sf) CN Description 20,886 98 Impervious, HSG A 93,042 39 Pervious, HSG A 113,928 50 Weighted Average 93,042 81.67% Pervious Area 20,886 18.33% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 20.0 Direct Entry, User Defined Summary for Subcatchment S3: Pro Cond Onsite Draining North Runoff = 0.04 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 86 cf, Depth= 0.46" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81" Spaeth Ind Park, Monticello, MN 00633 Pro Cond MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81 " Prepared by CESD HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 01607 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 3 Area (sf) CN Description 1,052 98 Impervious, HSG A 1,213 39 Pervious, >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 2,265 66 Weighted Average 1,213 53.55% Pervious Area 1,052 46.45% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, User Defined Summary for Subcatchment S4: Pro Cond Onsite Draining South Runoff = 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0 cf, Depth= 0.00" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81" Area (sf) CN Description 0 98 Impervious, HSG A 1,517 39 Pervious, >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 1,517 39 Weighted Average 1,517 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, User Defined Summary for Subcatchment S5: Pro Cond Onsite Draining East Runoff = 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0 cf, Depth= 0.00" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81" Area (sf) CN Description 0 98 Impervious, HSG A 2,942 39 Pervious, >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 2,942 39 Weighted Average 2,942 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, User Defined Spaeth Ind Park, Monticello, MN 00633 Pro Cond MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81 " Prepared by CESD HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 01607 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 4 Summary for Reach 1 R: Total Project Inflow Area = 305,759 sf, 55.90% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.00" for 2 -Year event Inflow = 0.04 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 86 cf Outflow = 0.04 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 86 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Summary for Pond P1: Under Ground System and Basin Inflow Area = 299,035 sf, 56.81 % Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.00" for 2 -Year event Inflow = 7.51 cfs @ 12.29 hrs, Volume= 24,861 cf Outflow = 0.42 cfs @ 14.02 hrs, Volume= 24,861 cf, Atten= 94%, Lag= 103.9 min Discarded = 0.42 cfs @ 14.02 hrs, Volume= 24,861 cf Primary = 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0 cf Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 957.82' @ 14.02 hrs Surf.Area= 22,730 sf Storage= 15,465 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 408.1 min calculated for 24,858 cf (100% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 408.1 min ( 1,227.0 - 818.8 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storaqe Description #1 956.00' 13,966 cf 4.00'W x 1,951.00'L x 3.00'H Underground System Rock Encasement Z= 41,043 cf Overall - 6,129 cf Embedded = 34,914 cf x 40.0% Voids #2 959.00' 7,613 cf 12.00'W x 1,951.00'L x 1.00'H Sand over Rock Encasement Z=1.0 25,376 cf Overall x 30.0% Voids #3 957.00' 6,129 cf 24.0" Round Pipe Storage Inside #1 L= 1,951.0' #4 957.00' 39,081 cf Infiltration Basin (Conic)Listed below (Recalc) 66,788 cf Total Available Storage Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store Wet.Area (feet) (sq -ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) (sq -ft) 957.00 6,422 0 0 6,422 958.00 8,142 7,265 7,265 8,168 959.00 9,133 8,633 15,898 9,213 960.00 11,796 10,436 26,334 11,900 961.00 13,722 12,747 39,081 13,867 Device Routinq Invert Outlet Devices #1 Discarded 956.00' 0.800 in/hr Exfiltration over Horizontal area #2 Primary 959.00' 15.0" Round Pipe Outlet L= 18.0' RCP, end -section conforming to fill, Ke= 0.500 Inlet/ Outlet Invert= 959.00'/ 958.70' S=0.0167'/' Cc= 0.900 n=0.012 Concrete pipe, finished, Flow Area= 1.23 sf 00633 Pro Cond Prepared by CESD HydroCAD® 10.00-18 Spaeth Ind Park, Monticello, MN MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81 " s/n 01607 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Discarded OutFlow Max=0.42 cfs @ 14.02 hrs HW=957.82' (Free Discharge) L1=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.42 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs HW=956.00' (Free Discharge) L2=Pipe Outlet ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Paae 5 Spaeth Ind Park, Monticello, MN 00633 Pro Cond MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" Prepared by CESD HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 01607 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 6 Summary for Subcatchment S1: Pro Cond Onsite to System Runoff = 13.25 cfs @ 12.29 hrs, Volume= 43,227 cf, Depth= 2.80" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" Area (sf) CN Description 148,981 98 Impervious, HSG A 29,704 39 Pervious, >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 6,422 49 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG A 185,107 87 Weighted Average 36,126 20.0 19.52% Pervious Area 148,981 80.48% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 20.0 Direct Entry, User Defined Summary for Subcatchment S2: Ex Cond Offsite Draining East to Area S1 Runoff = 0.61 cfs @ 12.42 hrs, Volume= 3,704 cf, Depth= 0.39" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" Area (sf) CN Description 20,886 98 Impervious, HSG A 93,042 39 Pervious, HSG A 113,928 50 Weighted Average 93,042 81.67% Pervious Area 20,886 18.33% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 20.0 Direct Entry, User Defined Summary for Subcatchment S3: Pro Cond Onsite Draining North Runoff = 0.12 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 226 cf, Depth= 1.20" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" Spaeth Ind Park, Monticello, MN 00633 Pro Cond MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" Prepared by CESD HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 01607 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 7 Area (sf) CN Description 1,052 98 Impervious, HSG A 1,213 39 Pervious, >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 2,265 66 Weighted Average 1,213 53.55% Pervious Area 1,052 46.45% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, User Defined Summary for Subcatchment S4: Pro Cond Onsite Draining South Runoff = 0.00 cfs @ 13.24 hrs, Volume= 8 cf, Depth= 0.07" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" Area (sf) CN Description 0 98 Impervious, HSG A 1,517 39 Pervious, >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 1,517 39 Weighted Average 1,517 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, User Defined Summary for Subcatchment S5: Pro Cond Onsite Draining East Runoff = 0.00 cfs @ 13.24 hrs, Volume= 16 cf, Depth= 0.07" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" Area (sf) CN Description 0 98 Impervious, HSG A 2,942 39 Pervious, >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 2,942 39 Weighted Average 2,942 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, User Defined Spaeth Ind Park, Monticello, MN 00633 Pro Cond MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" Prepared by CESD HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 01607 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 8 Summary for Reach 1 R: Total Project Inflow Area = 305,759 sf, 55.90% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.01" for 10 -Year event Inflow = 0.12 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 250 cf Outflow = 0.12 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 250 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 958.79' @ 15.28 hrs Surf.Area= 27,657 sf Storage= 32,257 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 692.3 min calculated for 46,931 cf (100% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 692.3 min ( 1,503.1 - 810.8 ) Volume Invert Summary for Pond P1: Under Ground System and Basin Inflow Area = 299,035 sf, 56.81 % Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.88" for 10 -Year event Inflow = 13.69 cfs @ 12.29 hrs, Volume= 46,931 cf Outflow = 0.51 cfs @ 15.28 hrs, Volume= 46,931 cf, Atten= 96%, Lag= 179.3 min Discarded = 0.51 cfs @ 15.28 hrs, Volume= 46,931 cf Primary = 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0 cf Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 958.79' @ 15.28 hrs Surf.Area= 27,657 sf Storage= 32,257 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 692.3 min calculated for 46,931 cf (100% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 692.3 min ( 1,503.1 - 810.8 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storaqe Description #1 956.00' 13,966 cf 4.00'W x 1,951.00'L x 3.00'H Underground System Rock Encasement Z= 41,043 cf Overall - 6,129 cf Embedded = 34,914 cf x 40.0% Voids #2 959.00' 7,613 cf 12.00'W x 1,951.00'L x 1.00'H Sand over Rock Encasement Z=1.0 25,376 cf Overall x 30.0% Voids #3 957.00' 6,129 cf 24.0" Round Pipe Storage Inside #1 L= 1,951.0' #4 957.00' 39,081 cf Infiltration Basin (Conic)Listed below (Recalc) 66,788 cf Total Available Storage Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store Wet.Area (feet) (sq -ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) (sq -ft) 957.00 6,422 0 0 6,422 958.00 8,142 7,265 7,265 8,168 959.00 9,133 8,633 15,898 9,213 960.00 11,796 10,436 26,334 11,900 961.00 13,722 12,747 39,081 13,867 Device Routinq Invert Outlet Devices #1 Discarded 956.00' 0.800 in/hr Exfiltration over Horizontal area #2 Primary 959.00' 15.0" Round Pipe Outlet L= 18.0' RCP, end -section conforming to fill, Ke= 0.500 Inlet/ Outlet Invert= 959.00'/ 958.70' S=0.0167'/' Cc= 0.900 n=0.012 Concrete pipe, finished, Flow Area= 1.23 sf 00633 Pro Cond Prepared by CESD HydroCAD® 10.00-18 Spaeth Ind Park, Monticello, MN MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" s/n 01607 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Discarded OutFlow Max=0.51 cfs @ 15.28 hrs HW=958.79' (Free Discharge) L1=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.51 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs HW=956.00' (Free Discharge) L2=Pipe Outlet ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Paae 9 Spaeth Ind Park, Monticello, MN 00633 Pro Cond MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Prepared by CESD HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 01607 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 10 Summary for Subcatchment S1: Pro Cond Onsite to System Runoff = 24.92 cfs @ 12.29 hrs, Volume= 83,478 cf, Depth= 5.41" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Area (sf) CN Description 148,981 98 Impervious, HSG A 29,704 39 Pervious, >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 6,422 49 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG A 185,107 87 Weighted Average 36,126 20.0 19.52% Pervious Area 148,981 80.48% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 20.0 Direct Entry, User Defined Summary for Subcatchment S2: Ex Cond Offsite Draining East to Area S1 Runoff = 4.21 cfs @ 12.33 hrs, Volume= 15,456 cf, Depth= 1.63" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Area (sf) CN Description 20,886 98 Impervious, HSG A 93,042 39 Pervious, HSG A 113,928 50 Weighted Average 93,042 81.67% Pervious Area 20,886 18.33% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 20.0 Direct Entry, User Defined Summary for Subcatchment S3: Pro Cond Onsite Draining North Runoff = 0.32 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 594 cf, Depth= 3.15" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Spaeth Ind Park, Monticello, MN 00633 Pro Cond MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Prepared by CESD HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 01607 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 11 Area (sf) CN Description 1,052 98 Impervious, HSG A 1,213 39 Pervious, >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 2,265 66 Weighted Average 1,213 53.55% Pervious Area 1,052 46.45% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, User Defined Summary for Subcatchment S4: Pro Cond Onsite Draining South Runoff = 0.03 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 94 cf, Depth= 0.74" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Area (sf) CN Description 0 98 Impervious, HSG A 1,517 39 Pervious, >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 1,517 39 Weighted Average 1,517 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, User Defined Summary for Subcatchment S5: Pro Cond Onsite Draining East Runoff = 0.06 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 182 cf, Depth= 0.74" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Area (sf) CN Description 0 98 Impervious, HSG A 2,942 39 Pervious, >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 2,942 39 Weighted Average 2,942 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, User Defined Spaeth Ind Park, Monticello, MN 00633 Pro Cond MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Prepared by CESD HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 01607 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 12 Summary for Reach 1 R: Total Project Inflow Area = 305,759 sf, 55.90% Impervious, Inflow Depth= 1.17" for 100 -Year event Inflow = 4.03 cfs @ 12.94 hrs, Volume= 29,857 cf Outflow = 4.03 cfs @ 12.94 hrs, Volume= 29,857 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 960.12' @ 12.94 hrs Surf.Area= 58,925 sf Storage= 55,432 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 482.5 min calculated for 98,920 cf (100% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 482.7 min ( 1,282.8 - 800.2 ) Volume Invert Summary for Pond P1: Under Ground System and Basin Inflow Area = 299,035 sf, 56.81 % Impervious, Inflow Depth = 3.97" for 100 -Year event Inflow = 28.99 cfs @ 12.29 hrs, Volume= 98,934 cf Outflow = 5.08 cfs @ 12.94 hrs, Volume= 98,934 cf, Atten= 82%, Lag= 39.0 min Discarded = 1.09 cfs @ 12.94 hrs, Volume= 69,947 cf Primary = 3.99 cfs @ 12.94 hrs, Volume= 28,987 cf Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 960.12' @ 12.94 hrs Surf.Area= 58,925 sf Storage= 55,432 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 482.5 min calculated for 98,920 cf (100% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 482.7 min ( 1,282.8 - 800.2 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storaqe Description #1 956.00' 13,966 cf 4.00'W x 1,951.00'L x 3.00'H Underground System Rock Encasement Z= 41,043 cf Overall - 6,129 cf Embedded = 34,914 cf x 40.0% Voids #2 959.00' 7,613 cf 12.00'W x 1,951.00'L x 1.00'H Sand over Rock Encasement Z=1.0 25,376 cf Overall x 30.0% Voids #3 957.00' 6,129 cf 24.0" Round Pipe Storage Inside #1 L= 1,951.0' #4 957.00' 39,081 cf Infiltration Basin (Conic)Listed below (Recalc) 66,788 cf Total Available Storage Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store Wet.Area (feet) (sq -ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) (sq -ft) 957.00 6,422 0 0 6,422 958.00 8,142 7,265 7,265 8,168 959.00 9,133 8,633 15,898 9,213 960.00 11,796 10,436 26,334 11,900 961.00 13,722 12,747 39,081 13,867 Device Routinq Invert Outlet Devices #1 Discarded 956.00' 0.800 in/hr Exfiltration over Horizontal area #2 Primary 959.00' 15.0" Round Pipe Outlet L= 18.0' RCP, end -section conforming to fill, Ke= 0.500 Inlet/ Outlet Invert= 959.00'/ 958.70' S=0.0167'/' Cc= 0.900 n=0.012 Concrete pipe, finished, Flow Area= 1.23 sf 00633 Pro Cond Prepared by CESD HydroCAD® 10.00-18 Spaeth Ind Park, Monticello, MN MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" s/n 01607 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Discarded OutFlow Max=1.09 cfs @ 12.94 hrs HW=960.12' (Free Discharge) L1=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 1.09 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=3.99 cfs @ 12.94 hrs HW=960.12' (Free Discharge) L2=Pipe Outlet (Barrel Controls 3.99 cfs @ 4.56 fps) Paae 13 APPENDIX C Volume Abstraction 1.0" Rainfall on New Impervious Surface and Stage -Storage Containment Volume Data Spaeth Industrial Park, Monticello, MN Drainage Analysis SPAETH INDUSTRIAL PARK, MONTICELLO, MN INFILTRATION WORKSHEET Requirements: Infiltrate runoff generated from a 1.1" rainfall over the applicable new impervious surface within 48 hours. Step 1: Determine areas of impervious surfaces area and effective infiltration. New impervious surface area = 150,032 sf removed existing impervious surface = 2,822 sf Net increase impervious surface = 150,032 - 2,822 = 147,210 sf Effective Infiltration Area = Underground System + Infiltration Basin Underground System = 1,951 if x 4 ft = 7,804 sf Infiltration Basin = 6,422 sf at bottom contour 957 elevation Total = 7,804 + 6,422 = 14,226 sf Step 2: Calculate runoff volume from increase impervious surface generated by 1.1" storm. 147,210 sf x 1.0 x 1.1 inch x 1 ft/l 2inch = 13,494 cf Net Increased Coefficient Rainfall Volume Impervious Required to be Surface Area Infiltrated Step 3: Calculate volume capacity of being infiltrated on site in 48 hours. Use infiltration rate for Type A soils = 0.80 in/hr. 14,226 sf x 0.80 in/hr x 48 hrs x 1 ft/ 12inch = 45,523 cf Effective Infiltration Volume Infiltration Rate Capacity Area in 48 Hours Step 4: Compare volume capacity to volume required to be infiltrated. 45,523 cf > 13,494 cf Volume Volume Capacity Required to be in 48 Hours Infiltrated 00633 Pro Cond MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Prepared by Hewlett-Packard Printed 4/30/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 01607 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Stage -Area -Storage for Pond P1: Under Ground System and Basin Elevation Horizontal Storage Elevation Horizontal Storage (feet) (sq -ft) (cubic -feet) (feet) (sq -ft) (cubic -feet) 956.00 7,804 0 958.60 26,727 28,891 956.05 8,000 158 958.65 26,973 29,782 956.10 8,195 320 958.70 27,220 30,675 956.15 8,391 486 958.75 27,467 31,568 956.20 8,586 656 958.80 27,714 32,461 956.25 8,782 829 958.85 27,961 33,352 956.30 8,977 1,007 958.90 28,208 34,241 956.35 9,173 1,188 958.95 28,455 35,123 956.40 9,369 1,374 959.00 52,115 35,993 956.45 9,564 1,563 959.05 52,436 36,805 956.50 9,760 1,756 959.10 52,759 37,627 956.55 9,956 1,954 959.15 53,082 38,457 956.60 10,151 2,155 959.20 53,406 39,298 956.65 10,347 2,360 959.25 53,731 40,147 956.70 10,543 2,568 959.30 54,056 41,006 956.75 10,739 2,781 959.35 54,383 41,875 956.80 10,935 2,998 959.40 54,710 42,752 956.85 11,130 3,219 959.45 55,039 43,640 956.90 11,326 3,443 959.50 55,368 44,537 956.95 11,522 3,672 959.55 55,698 45,443 957.00 18,140 3,904 959.60 56,029 46,360 957.05 18,417 4,488 959.65 56,361 47,285 957.10 18,695 5,100 959.70 56,694 48,221 957.15 18,973 5,732 959.75 57,027 49,166 957.20 19,251 6,381 959.80 57,362 50,122 957.25 19,531 7,047 959.85 57,697 51,087 957.30 19,810 7,727 959.90 58,033 52,062 957.35 20,091 8,421 959.95 58,370 53,047 957.40 20,371 9,128 960.00 58,708 54,042 957.45 20,653 9,848 960.05 58,801 54,634 957.50 20,935 10,580 960.10 58,894 55,230 957.55 21,217 11,324 960.15 58,988 55,832 957.60 21,500 12,078 960.20 59,082 56,438 957.65 21,783 12,844 960.25 59,176 57,049 957.70 22,067 13,620 960.30 59,271 57,664 957.75 22,352 14,406 960.35 59,366 58,285 957.80 22,637 15,202 960.40 59,461 58,910 957.85 22,922 16,008 960.45 59,557 59,540 957.90 23,208 16,823 960.50 59,653 60,174 957.95 23,495 17,647 960.55 59,749 60,814 958.00 23,782 18,479 960.60 59,846 61,458 958.05 24,027 19,319 960.65 59,943 62,107 958.10 24,271 20,165 960.70 60,041 62,761 958.15 24,516 21,017 960.75 60,139 63,420 958.20 24,761 21,875 960.80 60,237 64,084 958.25 25,006 22,737 960.85 60,336 64,753 958.30 25,251 23,605 960.90 60,435 65,426 958.35 25,497 24,476 960.95 60,534 66,105 958.40 25,743 25,353 961.00 60,634 66,788 958.45 25,988 26,233 958.50 26,234 27,116 958.55 26,481 28,002 APPENDIX D Soils Data Spaeth Industrial Park, Monticello, MN Drainage Analysis a Dundas Pd e s Z O Q O LL Z Ca G z LU 0 Lu J a f: M O O (O N N N ° 95 «. 91 Q O V c9 7 y @ co C' 9) y I a' a a 91 O ,� m m m r 9S � a m N O o m °Toa a° r- o m Co o c -O O U V) N m Q v1 7 V°i N — O) M.N w a a m m O v c0 p n m� �' N 7 v E .w Q O N 'Q_ @@ — -1 m m co a U) N O m y Cl) 9s @ a E 'a m CO O m 0 a) U w� o g y� .: c N ° y° t ° @moo 5 m 3 y 0)m o y U) a y a):2m Z �N 3 @ @° `O ;Q@@ ac m mn3 U @ nt y9Cl) U c9 m O Q w E 0m ICL coa 0 a) U T �CQ 9) N > 0 U�°OOw o E>'c . ° om m E m� Oo 0°°a ° m E ,�wLa)omoos iai'ano a Q Uym > — 2o Q.OQO 2— .09 v co E NCyE Oo 0) o N O� w E0) w Z�� >mLaim� a°i:? m o'rnaa) >. o a O V7 Q m T aa) �'' f0 f0 7 C a m Q N O -0 N O- m — c�� O� m�� yea c Q ..as m o-0Qm cn tp a°i Ern > E �<p m @ 0 z o 0 am D E N O m a �' ° 'p 6 D O m N O m Q Q O 9) a -° O o C:) c o a 91 m 7 m N > 3 T O O O al 0 fL `� 'O U C i Q O m e cn 'L Q m co y y m (/� m O Q N 91 O 91 co" Q N m 7 y� _ O y N >@ C N C O U m p >> m p 9) O to _� U 's w 'p 7 'p �? 95 p t 0 t H > W _ U y a E u) > U 2 a'a Q 95 H O (n (n (n — D N H U ._ y T m Z 3 U) (D O Z U) 7 m — 9s O m U) n -0 i y y j 0 76 as T > cc CL LL U r- as c U) a) a 0 N N p Nd C J a7 m O O @ L Z Q O O.N m p W af a .0 C Z, N N i y O 0 @ O L_ y _ a) U CL 0 U) CL U) > 0 U) CO O w S � J a a a1 au�o O d16 a 1 [[ co M y wOL ° m CD = oca U) 0 S o a 2 0 ` y a w a N N m a a d a a U)y d sU o o w o O o m m m d 3 U) � a T= a ° o 0 > 0 0 Q co a 3 o T y > > m i v ami c > Y a) a N .0 •O •� C O Z5 2 O (i0 2 N N @ C_ N O O @ a7 ID C � O d a U U U '0 m m U U iD (D J J a a' U co U U U fn m a m CL cn � y 0 y O m � tL m 7 y w 0 l6 O Z U Soil Map—Wright County, Minnesota Map Unit Legend Wright County, Minnesota (MN171) Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 406 Dorset sandy loam, 0 to 2 5.5 100.0% percent slopes Totals for Area of Interest 5.5 100.0% usDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 4/24/2017 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3 Engineering Properties (MN) ---Wright County, Minnesota Engineering Properties (MN) This table gives the engineering classifications and the range of engineering properties for the layers of each soil in the survey area. Hydrologic group is a group of soils having similar runoff potential under similar storm and cover conditions. Soil properties that influence runoff potential are those that influence the minimum rate of infiltration for a bare soil after prolonged wetting and when not frozen. These properties are depth to a seasonal high water table, saturated hydraulic conductivity after prolonged wetting, and depth to a layer with a very slow water transmission rate. Changes in soil properties caused by land management or climate changes also cause the hydrologic soil group to change. The influence of ground cover is treated independently. There are four hydrologic soil groups, A, B, C, and D, and three dual groups, A/D, B/D, and C/D. In the dual groups, the first letter is for drained areas and the second letter is for undrained areas. The four hydrologic soil groups are described in the following paragraphs: Group A. Soils having a high infiltration rate (low runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist mainly of deep, well drained to excessively drained sands or gravelly sands. These soils have a high rate of water transmission. Group B. Soils having a moderate infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of moderately deep or deep, moderately well drained or well drained soils that have moderately fine texture to moderately coarse texture. These soils have a moderate rate of water transmission. Group C. Soils having a slow infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of soils having a layer that impedes the downward movement of water or soils of moderately fine texture or fine texture. These soils have a slow rate of water transmission. Group D. Soils having a very slow infiltration rate (high runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of clays that have a high shrink -swell potential, soils that have a high water table, soils that have a claypan or clay layer at or near the surface, and soils that are shallow over nearly impervious material. These soils have a very slow rate of water transmission. Depth to the upper and lower boundaries of each layer is indicated. Texture is given in the standard terms used by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. These terms are defined according to percentages of sand, silt, and clay in the fraction of the soil that is less than 2 millimeters in diameter. "Loam," for example, is soil that is 7 to 27 percent clay, 28 to 50 percent silt, and less than 52 percent sand. If the content of particles coarser than sand is 15 percent or more, an appropriate modifier is added, for example, "gravelly." Classification of the soils is determined according to the Unified soil classification system (ASTM, 2005) and the system adopted by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO, 2004). usDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 4/24/2017 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 3 Engineering Properties (MN) ---Wright County, Minnesota The Unified system classifies soils according to properties that affect their use as construction material. Soils are classified according to particle -size distribution of the fraction less than 3 inches in diameter and according to plasticity index, liquid limit, and organic matter content. Sandy and gravelly soils are identified as GW, GP, GM, GC, SW, SP, SM, and SC; silty and clayey soils as ML, CL, OL, MH, CH, and OH; and highly organic soils as PT. Soils exhibiting engineering properties of two groups can have a dual classification, for example, CL -ML. The AASHTO system classifies soils according to those properties that affect roadway construction and maintenance. In this system, the fraction of a mineral soil that is less than 3 inches in diameter is classified in one of seven groups from A-1 through A-7 on the basis of particle -size distribution, liquid limit, and plasticity index. Soils in group A-1 are coarse grained and low in content of fines (silt and clay). At the other extreme, soils in group A-7 are fine grained. Highly organic soils are classified in group A-8 on the basis of visual inspection. If laboratory data are available, the A-1, A-2, and A-7 groups are further classified as A -1-a, A -1-b, A-2-4, A-2-5, A-2-6, A-2-7, A-7-5, or A-7-6. As an additional refinement, the suitability of a soil as subgrade material can be indicated by a group index number. Group index numbers range from 0 for the best subgrade material to 20 or higher for the poorest. Rock fragments larger than 10 inches in diameter and 3 to 10 inches in diameter are indicated as a percentage of the total soil on a dry -weight basis. The percentages are estimates determined mainly by converting volume percentage in the field to weight percentage. Percentage (of soil particles) passing designated sieves is the percentage of the soil fraction less than 3 inches in diameter based on an ovendry weight. The sieves, numbers 4, 10, 40, and 200 (USA Standard Series), have openings of 4.76, 2.00, 0.420, and 0.074 millimeters, respectively. Estimates are based on laboratory tests of soils sampled in the survey area and in nearby areas and on estimates made in the field. Liquid limit and plasticity index (Atterberg limits) indicate the plasticity characteristics of a soil. The estimates are based on test data from the survey area or from nearby areas and on field examination. References: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). 2004. Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling and testing. 24th edition. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00. usDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 4/24/2017 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 3 Z � $ 4) E @ CL 0 L- a. tm � .� � � .7 � W � 0 � � � k$ » G- z a a a z z z z \ / 0 i 2 \ $ \ r r c § ■ $ OP/ ? .LD 2 / 3 3 @ 8 E a \ < & \ ( / \ f § le/ @ g a \ \ $ \ 2 U) / f A j CL / C§ • 0 0 6 E U) 7LLA ) ¢ 0 - c o c o ( ¥ / \ 4 C 1- 3 ƒ k § 4 a** 4 f § ; � ] tE e % \ e CO ƒ § 0 \° CO \ \ a 7 e o\ m m "y %± ± $a > \ ) E 4) )ƒ»0 )ƒb§\\ / « {f \m ;±&m ;2§m Ul \ ƒf\{ ƒ\\/\( /$°33 /))\m2 §mm=mg )ee 2 200 § m & \ _ \ PI - C6 /50 _ 0) m )CL - co 2E k >D .0 \ k �r \} E0. wc� E_ m £ \/\ j « wn \ 2 z S §\ 0 kC z3 0 1WSB Building a legacy — Your legacy. May 31, 2017 Ms. Angela Schumann Community Development Director City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1 Monticello, MN 55362 Re: Spaeth Industrial Park Preliminary Development Stage PUD -Site Plan Review City Project No. 2017-017 WSB Project No. 02596-420 Dear Ms. Schumann: 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763-541-4800 Fax: 763-541-1700 We have reviewed the civil plans, dated May 8, 2017 and the drainage analysis dated May 8, 2017, as prepared by Civil Engineering Site Design and offer the following comments below and on the enclosed is a stormwater plan review checklist. Stormwater Management 1. Proposed stormwater management for the site includes an underground infiltration system consisting of perforated storm sewer under a majority of the paved areas with 0% grades and an infiltration basin along the south property line. The ultimate discharge elevation of this system to the ditch along Dundas Road is at an elevation of 958.7 feet which is 1.7 feet above the infiltration system elevation of 957.0. This creates a situation where, apart from infiltration, runoff will only leave the site after water builds up 1.7 feet. In the event that the infiltration system plugs up and fails, the underground pipe network will be filled with water. Flat pipes across the entire site will likely result in maintenance problems. This is not an ideal or a recommended design if not properly maintained, as it could create a risk for on-site flooding. City staff has discussed alternate stormwater management techniques with the applicant, such as outletting the system to the south east corner of the property and directing it to the ditch/channel that serves the industrial park or filling the site to provide a positive outlet. There are additional property constraints and costs associated with these alternatives that the applicant has reviewed and has chosen not to undertake. Ultimately the proposed stormwater management system is privately owned and maintained and should not impact the City's ditch/channel system and adjacent properties if properly maintained. Equal Opportunity Employer wsbeng.com K:\02596-420\Adm1n\Docs\050817 submittal Spaeth Industrial Park May 31, 2017 Page 2 2. An operation and maintenance plan for the stormwater management system is required. The City will provide an operation and maintenance plan for the owner to sign. At a minimum the plan will include: an inspection schedule/frequency for the infiltration system and maintenance schedule for cleaning out the sumps. The proposed site design must provide for a means to visually inspect and maintain the entire system. This will require visual ports throughout the site, in order to locate and repair problem areas if the system fails. 3. The infiltration system should be designed to provide a means to visually verify that the system is discharging through the soil surface within 48 hours or less. Also, the system must be designed for adequate maintenance access. 4. The NRCS Soil Survey indicates HSG B soils throughout the site and contributing offsite area. The HydroCAD model and narrative should be updated to reflect type B soils. Infiltration rates surrounding the perforated pipe system should be updated according to those listed in the Minnesota Stormwater Manual. 5. Depth to groundwater and bedrock must be confirmed in the proposed infiltration areas to ensure infiltration is not being proposed within 3 feet of the seasonally high water table or bedrock. This information should be obtained from a soil boring investigation. Soil classifications from the investigation can be used for preliminary design purposes. Soil borings should extend to a minimum of 5 feet below the bottom of the infiltration practice. The lowest (i.e. most restrictive) infiltration rate within 5 feet shall be used for design purposes. 6. Because the entire site is underlain by the infiltration area, confirmation of design infiltration rates during construction should be completed. The infiltration system needs to be confirmed that it will function as it was designed with preliminary estimates. This can be accomplished by performing infiltration testing, such as double ring infiltrometer tests. The MPCA guide for determining the number of infiltration tests and borings is provided here: 7rereaitormwater control measure (BMF)(ft) i000 to 5000 50M to 40000 (>1©U00 borings Fits Fermeameter tests 5 2 2 10 3 3 15 41 41 202 'an additional soil boring or pit should be completed for each additional 2,509 fr above 12,500 fit= tan additional five permeameter tests should be completed for each additional 3,W ft2 alawe 15,004 dtt KA02596420\Admin\Docs\050817 submittal\SpaethDrainageReview 053117.doa Spaeth Industrial Park May 31, 2017 Page 3 7. Soils that have infiltration rates more than 8.3 inches per hour must be amended to slow the infiltration rate below 8.3 inches per hour, per the CSWGP. The CSWGP does allow for the local unit of government (the City) flexibility with this rate criteria. 8. Provide rational method calculations confirming adequacy of the storm sewer design for the 10 -year storm event. Calculations should adhere to the following guidelines: • The rational method runoff coefficient (c) is designated by land use and should be assigned a value no less than 0.7. • Minimum allowable velocity in closed conduit = 3.0 fps • Maximum allowable velocity in closed conduit = 12.0 fps 9. Rate control is assumed to be accommodated in the existing north -south ditch/channel and downstream pond located on the north side of Chelsea Road, just west of Fallon Avenue at the City's water reservoir site. The applicant has indicated they are providing rate control with the infiltration system and shall revise the system as needed. 10. Grading, drainage and erosion control shall comply with City's zoning ordinance. See Chapter 4, section 4.10 related to grading, drainage, stormwater management and erosion control and the City's Design Manual- updated May 2017 located on the City's website- Engineering department. HvdroCAD Model 11. The proposed stoimwater management system (as it currently is designed) should be modeled with a starting water elevation of 958.7 feet for establishing the 100 year HWL elevation. 12. Proposed discharge rates exceed existing in the 2 -year event. Rates should be summarized at each point of discharge from the site (North, East and South). 13. Time of concentrations should be updated to more accurately reflect the proposed subcatchments based on land cover and average slope. 14. There is a discrepancy in the primary outlet device from Pond Pl, labelled 15" in the model and 18" in the plans. If the pipe is designed to be an 18 -inch RCP, additional rip -rap is required (3.6 CY rather than 2.9 CY). SWPPP Refer to the MPCA's SWPPP Checklist for a complete list of requirements. 15. Describe the procedures to amend the SWPPP and establish additional ESC BMPs as necessary. 16. Describe methods used to minimize soil compaction and preserve topsoil K:\02596420\Admin\Docs\050817 submittal\SpaethDmInageReview 053117.do Spaeth Industrial Park May 31, 2017 Page 4 17. Since 1 acre or more of the site is being disturbed, a NPDES/SDS Construction Storm Water General Permit and SWPPP shall be provided with the grading permit or with the building permit application for review, prior to construction commencing. 18. The SWPPP mentions select roof drainage is directed to the wetland adjacent to the south property boundary. This note is incorrect. Site Plan 19. Provide a truck turning template for a semi -truck accessing the truck access areas on the site. The applicant has indicated that semi trucks will not be entering the site, however it does, the City would like a template showing how circulation will be accomplished and the ability for trucks to be contained within the curbed area. Grading and Drainage Plan 20. Clearly define an emergency overflow elevation (EOF) on the plans. Sanitary and Water Utilitv Plan 21. A note should be added to the plans that the City will not be responsible for any additional costs incurred that is associated with variations in the utility as -built elevations. These elevations shall be verified in the field prior to construction. 22. The development agreement will include language on City maintenance of the sanitary sewer mainline and watermain system within the site. 23. A utility excavation permit must be obtained from the Public Works department prior to commencement of utility connections. 24. Provide an as -built utility plan once construction is complete. Storm Sewer Utilitv Plan 25. Confirm that the HDPE perforated pipe being proposed under pavement throughout the site is designed to handle the loads it will experience. 26. Label the storm sewer pipe between CB -3 and CB -5. Site Details 27. It is recommended to add a trash guard for flared end sections per City Detail 4007. 28. Include City Detail 6003- Mud Mat Construction Entrance. K:\02596420\Admin\Docs\050817 submittal\Spaeth Dr inageRevie% 053117.doa Spaeth Industrial Park May 31, 2017 Page 5 29. Include City Detail 30. Applicable detail plates shall be updated per the City's April 2017 General Specifications and Standard Detail Plates for Street and Utility Construction located on the City's website- Engineering department. Please have the applicant provide a written response addressing the comments above. Please give me a call at 763-271-3236 if you have any questions or comments regarding this letter. Thank you. Sincerely, WSB & Associates, Inc. Shibani K. Bisson, PE City Engineer cc: Steve Grittman, NAC skb K:\0259"20\Admin\Docs\0508175ubmittal\SpaethDrainageReview 053117.doa t ;•«.- =..r i �'� �r Jst <rtt w... 4',t• ra la-:.. � •tr« i •{��a`.,, . .- . 41. ;'•i/r9 .7 �{:;e � _'`. 'i'r �:! .•�`r T e«."•'• +•1�� . -. - .. ..�ra - 1Qwk • f� >�<-tit ' }'- � • .t�„ ` '�t ..`, •w ! , �, tt ,r•'�''. :i"<'"1's: i� p tl�►r ,ri �:. i1, •'".: �• ,t►+. `�. _ - m s s, • t"iit T's".�v�i ., r" •ii � , c � a M � ' • • i �.'r , � is ir•�, r1 >•�/�+. �`f t AMoCIiiAo City of Monticello — Stormwater Site Plan Review 107 Dundas Road, Address: Monticello, MN Permit No: PID: I Date Approved: Date Received: 5/12/2017 Signature: Area of Site Size (acres): 14.40 Disturbance(acres): 1 4.60 ExistingI Proposed Impervious (acres): 0.06 Impervious (acres): 1 3.38 A Stormwater Management Plan is required for: Any land disturbing activity that may ultimately result in the addition of one acre or greater of impervious surfaces, including smaller individual sites that are part of a common plan of development that may be constructed at different times. The construction of any new public or private road; or - Any land disturbance activity, regardless of size, that the City determines is likely to cause an adverse impact to an environmentally sensitive area or other property. Submittals Received Date Document Author 5/8/17 Preliminary Plat, Spaeth Industrial Park Scott Dahlke, Civil Engineering Site Design 5/8/17 Civil Site Plans, Spaeth Industrial Park Scott Dahlke, Civil Engineering Site Design 5/Scott Dahlke, Civil8;'17 Drainage Analysis, Spaeth Industrial Park Engineering Site Design 5/5/17I Spaeth Project Narrative I Ken Spaeth, Ken Spaeth Masonry General Site Plan Yes No 1. Scale of Survey. Minimum scale 1" = 50'. Maximum size plan sheet 24" x 36" ® ❑ 2. Survey signed by a registered survey with elevations in NGVD-1929 datum for the following locations: • Each lot corner ® ❑ • Grade elevation at the foundation and elevation of top of foundation of structures on N ❑ adjacent lots • Grade elevation at the foundation, elevation of top of foundation and garage floor of © ❑ proposed new construction • Lowest point of entry (i.e. door sill or top of window well) of proposed and existing © 7 construction • Lowest floor of proposed and existing construction ® ❑ 3. Any proposed retaining wall must have a top and bottom elevation and bottom elevation ❑ ❑ would be finish grade. Also, no retaining wall is allowed to be built on private property October 2016 4. Retaining walls greater than 4.0 feet in height have been designed and certified by a ❑ ❑ licensed professional engineer and a building permit has been acquired 9. Waste control 5. All drainage and utility easements are shown? N ❑ 6. Easements are clear of any encroachments? N ❑ 7. New curb cuts proposed? ❑ ❑ 8. If new curb cut is proposed, stamp all survey maps with the curb cut stamp. Also, write a N ❑ note on the Residential Plan & Routing Approval form reminding the builder that a curb ❑ ❑ cut permit is required if the driveway is moved or a new driveway is added N ❑ 9. Low floor a minimum of 4.25' (feet) above the sanitary sewer invert elevation N ❑ Comments: N ❑ Erosion/Sediment Control Plan Yes 1. SWPPP notes provided on the plan 2. Temporary stabilization measures provided 3. Erosion control blankets provided on all slopes greater than 3:1 4. Perimeter Control i.e., Silt Fence, Filter Log, etc. 5. Phasing for sites that are > 1 acre 6. CB Inlet Protection 7. Dewatering 8. Sediment control 9. Waste control 10. Concrete washout 11. Rock entrance N N El N N 12. Street sweeping schedule ❑ 13. Permanent restoration plan N 14. Erosion protection at all outlet pipes N 15. SWPPP includes an erosion and sediment control inspection schedule and person ❑ responsible for maintenance Comments: A street sweeping schedule needs to be added to the SWPPP. FI Provide the name and contact information of the person responsible for SWPPP implementation and long term operations and maintenance of the permanent stormwater management system, including certification number. Stormwater Management Plan '1 Yes 4 No 4 1. Delineation maps for existing and proposed conditions N ❑ 2. Modeling calculations for existing and proposed conditions using Atlas 14 storm events with an MSE3 type distribution. • 2 year 24 hr. (2.84"), 10 year 24 hr. (4.22"), 100 (6.87"), 10 -day snowmelt (7.211) N ❑ • Modeled direct connected impervious separate N ❑ 3. Off-site drainage included N ❑ 4. Wetlands shown on plans and wetland permitting completed ❑ N 5. Pretreatment N ❑ October 2016 6. Skimmer structures provided on the outlets of all ponds. ❑ ❑ 7. Soil borings ❑ N 8. Design Infiltration Rate Determination — Geotechnical Report or Infiltration Testing ❑ ❑ 8. Proposed ponds meet or exceed NURP design criteria provided ❑ 9. If infiltration of LF' is not feasible, water quality goals are met with NURP pond on site? 9. Seasonal High Water Elevation ❑ 10. Open channel flow calculations ❑ 171 11. Storm sewer calculations — 10 year event ❑ N 12. Narrative describing the following: a. Existing Conditions: Yes b. Proposed Conditions: Yes c. Stormwater Management for Proposed Site: Yes Comments: Separation distance from bottom of infiltration features to seasonally high water table and bedrock must be determined. Amended soils are being proposed within infiltration basin, but soil borings should be taken to confirm infiltration rates of the soils surrounding the perforated pipe (MRCS soil survey indicates HSG B) Provide operation and maintenance plans for the sumps and infiltration system. Water Quality and Volume Reduction "The Chy of Monticello has adopted MPC4 Minimal Impact Design Standards in Chapter 4 of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Section 4.10. MIDs Infiltration design criteria as described in the MPC4 Stormwater Manual .shall be followed for the proposed project. " Yes 4 No � 1. Volume control provided as per the City's Engineering Design Standards and M1DS (1.1" ® ❑ over new impervious surface) 2. Impervious area equal to or greater than the net increase in impervious surface is routed ® ❑ through infiltration BMP 3. Sequencing provided for alternatives where infiltration is infeasible ❑ ❑ 13494 4. Required Volume Reduction: Cf 5. Provided Volume Reduction: 35993cf 6. Separation to groundwater and/or bedrock is a minimum of 3 feet from bottom of ❑ infiltration BMP 7. Drawdown time for infiltration BMP is within 48 hours N ❑ 8. Proposed ponds meet or exceed NURP design criteria ❑ ❑ 9. If infiltration of LF' is not feasible, water quality goals are met with NURP pond on site? ❑ ❑ Comments: Rate Control I Yes J No 4 1 October 2016 1. Peak Proposed Discharge Rates < Existing ❑ N 2. Existing infrastructure can accommodate peak discharge rates for 10 year storm? ❑ ❑ 3. Existing infrastructure and EOF for proposed 100 year peak discharge rate? ❑ N 4. Proposed flow patterns do not create flooding impacts for structures adjacent to the N ❑ property? Comments: Rates exceeded in 2 -year event Provide rational storm sewer design sheet to demonstrate existing infrastructure can accommodate peak discharge rates for 10 -year Define an EOF for 100 -year event Yes J No 1. Building Opening: • 2' above the critical 100 -yr HWL of local basins, wetlands, & infiltration basins N ❑ • 2' above EOF of local basins, wetlands, & infiltration basins N ❑ • 2' above the 100 -yr flow elevation of a swale or channel at the point where the swale N ❑ channel is closest to the building 2. Low Floor Elevation: • 2' above the critical 100 -yr HWL of major basins N ❑ • 2' above EOF of major basins ® ❑ • For landlocked basins: 2' above the HWL from back to back 100 -yr rainfalls or 2' above the HWL from the 100 -yr 10 -day snowmelt, whichever is higher. Starting elevation of the basin/waterbody prior to runoff is one of the following: o Existing Ordinary High Water level established by the Minnesota Department ❑ ❑ of Natural Resources o Annual water balance calculation approved by the City ❑ ❑ o Local observation well records, as approved by the City ❑ ❑ o Mottled soil ❑ ❑ October 2016 Council Meeting — 06/26/2017 2L. Consideration of adopting Ordinance 671A amending the Monticello Zoning Ordinance Chapter 4, Section 3 — Fences and Walls, Chapter 4, Section 5 for regulations for multi -tenant building signage, Chapter 5, Section 3 for regulations on Accessory Use Dwellings, and Chapter 5, Section 4 for regulations for Temporary Uses — Food Trucks (JS) A. REFERANCE AND BACKGROUND: On June 12, 2017 the City Council adopted Ordinance 671 amending the Monticello Zoning Ordinance Chapter 4, Section 3 — Fences and Walls; Chapter 4, Section 5 for regulations for multi -tenant building signage, Chapter 5, Section 3 for regulations on Accessory Use Dwellings, and Chapter 5, Section 4 for regulations for Temporary Uses — Food Trucks. Due to the lengthy nature of the ordinance, staff is asking Council to adopt a summary ordinance. The summary ordinance will be used for publication as required by state statutes. Summary ordinances are typically brought forward at the same time as the original ordinance, however, this was not presented on June 12. Al. Budget Impact: Approving this item will significantly reduce the cost of publishing the full ordinance. A2. Staff Workload Impact: NA. B. ALTERNATIVES ACTIONS: 1. Motion to adopt Summary Ordinance 671A amending the Monticello Zoning Ordinance Chapter 4, Section 3 — Fences and Walls; Chapter 4, Section 5 for regulations for multi - tenant building signage, Chapter 5, Section 3 for regulations on Accessory Use Dwellings and Chapter 5, Section 4 for regulations for Temporary Uses — Food Trucks 2. Motion to deny. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative #1. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • Draft Summary Ordinance 671A SUMMARY ORDINANCE NO. 671A CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA A SUMMARY ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 10 OF THE MONTICELLO ZONING CODE FOR CHAPTER 4, SECTION 3 — FENCES AND WALLS; CHAPTER 4, SECTION 5 FOR REGULATIONS FOR MULTI -TENANT BUILDING SIGNAGE, CHAPTER 5, SECTION 3 FOR REGULATIONS ON ACCESSORY USE DWELLINGS AND CHAPTER 5, SECTION 4 FOR REGULATIONS FOR TEMPORARY USES — FOOD TRUCKS NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, on June 12, 2017, Ordinance No. 671 was adopted by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. Due to the lengthy nature of Ordinance No. 671, the following Summary Ordinance No. 671A has been prepared for publication as authorized by state law. The ordinance adopted by the Council amends Title 10 of the Monticello Zoning Code. The general purpose of the ordinance amendments are to clarify various chapters and sections with changes to the following: 4.3: Fences and Walls 4.5: Signs - Multi -tenant Building Signage 5.3: Accessory Use Standards 5.4: Temporary Uses — Food Trucks A printed copy of the whole ordinance is available for inspection by any person during the City's regular office hours. The complete ordinance will be posted on the City's website following publication. APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION by the City Council of Monticello, Minnesota, this 26th day of June, 2017. CITY OF MONTICELLO Brian Stumpf, Mayor ATTEST: Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator VOTING IN FAVOR: VOTING IN OPPOSITION: City Council Agenda — 06/26/2017 2M Consideration call for a public hearing on Julv 11, 2017 by the Monticello Planning Commission on the amendment to the Monticello Comprehensive Plan for adoption of the Downtown Small Area Plan. Applicant: Citv of Monticello (AS) Property: City of Monticello Planning Case Number: 2017-023 A. REFERENCE & BACKGROUND The City Council is asked to direct that a public hearing be held by the Monticello Planning Commission on a comprehensive plan amendment for the adoption of the Downtown Small Area Plan. Similar to the Embracing Downtown Plan, the Downtown Small Area Plan is proposed as an appendix to the Monticello Comprehensive Plan. The Downtown Small Area Plan provides guidance on land use, economic development, parks, and transportation components of the Comprehensive Plan specific to the core downtown area. As such, a comprehensive plan amendment to incorporate the document and amend text within the existing Comprehensive Plan is necessary. Comprehensive Plan amendments require a public hearing process. The Parks Commission reviewed the plan on May 26th, recommending that it move forward to the City Council for adoption. The EDA will review the plan on June 21St for recommendation to the Council. The next step in the review process prior to Council consideration of the Downtown Small Area Plan is Planning Commission's public hearing for the related Comprehensive Plan amendments and the Commission's review and recommendation on the Downtown Small Area Plan. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to call for a public hearing by the Monticello Planning Commission on July 11th, 2017 to consider amendments to the Monticello Comprehensive Plan for adoption of the Downtown Small Area Plan. 2. Motion to table action for additional information. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends alternative #1 above. The Downtown Small Area Plan process has followed the scope of work laid out in the contract for the project and is in draft form for review and public hearing by the Planning Commission. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Public Hearing Notice NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statute 13D.04, notice is hereby given that a public hearing of the Monticello Planning Commission is scheduled to consider the following matter: TIME: 6:00 p.m. DATE: Tuesday, July 11th, 2017 HEARING LOCATION: Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center HEARING SUBJECT: Consideration of a request for amendment to the Comprehensive Plan for adoption of the Downtown Small Area Study PROPERTY LOCATION: City of Monticello APPLICANT: City of Monticello Angela Schumann, Community Development Director Oral testimony will be accepted on the above subjects, and all persons desiring to be heard on referenced subjects will be heard at this meeting. Written comments may be taken at the Monticello City Hall, 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1, Monticello, MN 55362 until the date of the hearing. Questions may be directed to the City of Monticello at 763-295-2711. Note: Recommendations of the Planning Commission will be subject to the approval or denial of the City Council. Date Posted: June 19th, 2017 Date Published: June 29th, 2017 City Council Agenda: 06/26/17 2N. Consideration of avvrovin2 installation of new electrical service at Well House #2 by Olson & Sons Electric (OSE) for $12,259 and Xcel Energv for $12,912.85 (total of $25,171.85) (MT) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: City Council is asked to consider the installation of a new electrical service for Well #2 located at 209 Cedar Street. Well #2 was installed in 1970, and currently Xcel Energy supplies a service drop to Well House #1 (132 E. Broadway), consisting of 240v Delta 3 phase power. At the point of attachment to Well House #1, there are a set of current transformers mounted on the mast. On the load side of the current transformers there are service conductors feeding Well House #1 and an underground lateral feeding Well House #2, approximately 250' feet away. Each of the well houses have independent service equipment and soft starter equipment sized to accommodate a 100 HP motor. Due to higher water demands in the City of Monticello, it is necessary to run both of these motors simultaneously, something that has been avoided in the past due to service installation. It has been determined to comfortably run both wells simultaneously, these well houses need to have separate services. In the 5 -year Capital Improvement Plan we have a new well (Well #6) on schedule for 2019, in the amount of $1.2 million. We have been pushing that back for the past eight years, and if we install the new electrical service to Well #2, we can keep pushing that back another five or more years. The cost to install a separate electrical service to the well house is $12,912.85 for Xcel Energy to add a 3-phase pole on Cedar Street between the alley and 3rd Street, 3-phase transformer bank, and overhead service to the building. The new incoming service would be 400 amps, 208 volts, 3-phase fed, approximately 25' from the northeast corner of Well House #2. Wes Olson Electric came in with the lowest quote to run the new electrical service overhead for $10,013. This would include removing the service lateral from Well House #1 feeding Well House #2 and establish an independent service at Well House #2. They would supply and install everything that is listed in the RFP (which is in the supporting data). To run the new electrical service underground from the new Xcel Energy pole, Olson & Sons Electric (OSE) had the lowest quote of $12,259. This would include removing the service lateral from Well House #1 feeding Well House #2 and establish an independent service at Well House #2. They would supply and install everything that is listed in the RFP. Al. Budget Impact: The appropriate funds will be allocated from the Water Improvement Fund for the installation of the new electrical service at Well House #2. A2. Staff Workload Impact: Installing the new electrical service to Well House #2 is minimal. City Council Agenda: 06/26/17 B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve installation of a new electrical service for Well House #2 for the total of $25,171.85, including the new pole from Xcel Energy and underground service installed by Olson & Sons Electric. Staff is recommending the underground service due to the revitalization of Block #34, as the underground installation is preferred and less complicated for future development and expansion. 2. Motion to approve installation of a new electrical service for Well House #2 for the total of $22,925.85, including the new pole from Xcel Energy and above -ground service installed by Wes Olson Electric. 3. Motion to deny the installation of a new electrical service to Well House #2 at this time. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends Alternative 1 — installation of new electrical for Well House #2 for a total of $25,171.85, including the new pole from Xcel Energy and underground service installed by Olson & Sons Electric. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Quote tabulation for electrical improvements by contractor B. Xcel Energy cost for second service on Cedar Street C. City of Monticello Capital Improvement Plan for Well No#6 D. History of Wells #1 and #2 motor sizes and GPM E. City of Monticello historic maximum water demand F. RFQ d W epi CO W J Q N N F N 00 O N O w W O N N a W N� z z Q Z W p Z Q W U l"I F it � N O O � w z O � � V O Q m O WWc W ~ � �i N Il1 p N Z :) W 0 Q C7 z � J O N � O' ci W M O Q LL D cc u0 W W u W U z z W J W W = LL O O H I j N o � K F. g O 7 a W d W epi CO W J Q N N N 00 O N O w W N a z z Q p W Q W U it � N O O � Q N Z :) W 0 Q C7 z N N N w H ci W M O w D cc vN W W _ z z W � LL O O I j N o � K F. g W w 7 a c0 � F m W Q � 3 N O Z O U yR O N N z Q p ~ C O c Q co W p ~ F O ~ Q N wO x O ZO w U O U W z O A z O � Ln L!1 J z0 2 U z O O w LM Ln 0 W 0 2 V C W W p p p N o Ln 'A zzcc O W O 2 U U W p Q > K Y w c0 oc O N W N a z O p W W U K N Q N w H �.- O w D O vN W W _ z z � LL O O I j N � K F. g W w 7 c0 � F � W Q � 3 Z O U i p w z = Q ~ c Q ccW F Q N I 0 Y G 9 L Q M ai O Q L Q m a) L Y L ° W N N ° U N L H W N N Ol N N N O N Ca) E 0 V a) 3 w L V O Y v 3 ° Q E 75_ °- o V N 0 01 Y d ♦+ W W 0 (ai a E U N < d Q c ° y_ V N d 3 � L C U C O N C v O w Q U N v u y a) N O t T'a� a A N m E N L 9 FL -9 C Z Lo CO U O m N O m a E a ai r m O 0 N d O N C L w O M a to C UCO ° r X L C N �'aLn Q y C c °U 0L Ou d 01g0) V N L —N� %`O W (, N ° ''' N 01 a1 0 IE W c a)° R C N -O N Z O °(D LU V JIB V) N ro r Vi m x¢�atil xa g I Capital Improvement Plan City of Monticello, Minnesota Project # UTW-13-003 Project Name Well #6 Description Construct and drill well #6. 2018 dtru 2022 Department Utility -Water Contact Pubhe Works Director T7 pe improvement Useful Life 40 years Categon Water System Priorit) 3 Important (COULD -DO) Justification Increase the city's water availability and maintain proper water system capacities Total Project Cost: $1,200,000 Expenditures 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total Construction/Maintenance 1,200,000 1,200,000 Total 1,200,000 1,200,000 Funding Sources 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total Water Fund 1,200,000 1,200,000 Total 1,200,000 1,200,000 BudgetImpact(Other Well become part of the city's water system maintenance schedule and there will be increased electncal costs for operating the pumps. Produced Lung the Plan -h Capital Planwn I. Soho a re YEAR GPM 2018 2017 2016 1258 2015 1259 2014 1279 2013 1274 2012 1280 2011 1300 2010 1310 2009 1212 2008 1231 2007 1239 2006 1300 2005 1297 2004 1325 2003 1312 2002 1272 2001 1279 2000 1294 1999 1317 1998 1328 1997 1325 1996 1315 1995 1322 1994 1300 1993 1315 1992 1300 1991 1388 1990 I 1388 IC 1989-) 1200 1988 1200 1987 I 1200 om 1985 I — 1984 1983 1982 HISTORY OF WELL #1 AND WELL #2 WELL #1 MOTOR HP 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 75 75 M 1 COMMENTS I I GPM * E3 * *# � II � II Mar 1986 - burned up 60 hp; installed 75 hp July 1984 - rebuilt July 1983 - rebuilt � _II 1350 1368 1388 1369 1398 1400 1300 1345 1300 1288 1300 1308 1315 1300 1317 1311 1301 1325 1329 1324 1063 1065 1075 1050 1050 1035 1035 1160 1160 1160 WELL #2 MOTOR HP 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100- 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 75 75 75 75 75 75 COMMENTS * 75 I * ' used the 75 hp from Well #1 60 60 60 60 60 Sept 1985 -rebuilt I 60 I Aug 1984 - rebuilt—1 � � I KEY: * = 7 year regular maintenance service # = Replaced pump in Well #1 after pumping 2,556,476,000 gallons of water from 1989 to 2010 Q = Year the 800,00 gallon water tower went "on-line" -pressure up by 29 P.S.I F:\ADMIN\Spread\WATER DEPT\HISTORY OF WELL #1 AND WELL #2-2010 6/16/2017 Table 2. Historic water demand (see definitions in the glossary after Part 4 of this template) Year Pop. Served Total Connections Residential Water Delivered (MG) CJI/I Water Delivered (MG) Water used for Non- essential Wholesale Deliveries (MG) Total Water Delivered (MG) Total Water Pumped MG ( ) Water Supplier Services Percent Unmetered/ Unaccounted Average Dail y Demand (MGD) Max. Daily Demand (MGD) Date of Max. Demand Residential Per Capita Demand (GPCD) Total per capita Demand (GPCD) 2005 10,211 3,665 344.197 132.528 54.965 .261 532.951 572.784 I 1.000 I 6.9 1.569 4.889 7/16/2005 92 154 2006 10,662 3,826 419.892 135.294 48.622 .834 604.642 665.925 2.480 8.8 1.569 5.271 7/11/2006 108 171 1.260 I 2007 11,136 3,849 467.673 140.554 47.703 .759 656.689 701.133 6.1 1.921 5.150 7/1/2007 115 172 2008 11,253 3,897 409.880 132.025 52.154 .209 594.268 640.320 1.555 6.7 1.754 4.728 8/10/2008 99 155 2009 11,366 3,969 423.082 146.581 64.992 .238 636.894 659.541 2.001 3.4 1.807 I 4.496 5/28/2009 102 159 I .676 I 2010 12,759 3,969 376.688 137.226 47.227 .675 561.816 593.175 5.2 1.625 I 4.171 5/31/2010 81 127 2011 12,759 3,969 348.580 135.165 44.220 .254 528.219 568.253 1.156 I 6.8 1.557 4.116 6/7/2011 75 122 2012 12,840 3,983 426.358 143.936 47.866 .271 618.431 657.908 6.051 5.0 1.798 4.590 7/1/2012 91 140 6.127 I 2013 12,901 4,045 383.079 134.774 42.207 1.269 561.329 591.889 4.6 1.621 4.269 8/25/2013 81 126 2014 12,993 4,112 328.836 117.679 35.566 3.967 486.048 511.234 6.469 3.6 1.401 4.031 8/3/2014 69 108 2015 13,125 4,148 325.188 115.181 37.006 .437 477.812 513.676 4.797 6.0 1.407 3.203 6/16/2015 68 107 2016 13,311 4,225 329.069 120.203 36.648 .937 486.857 519.364 4.532 5.3 1.423 3.450 06/28/2016 67 106 Avg. 12,896 2010- 2015 MG - Million Gallons 4,037 364.788 130.660 42.348 1.145 538.942 572.689 4.213 5.2 1.568 4.063 77 1 122 MGD- N illion Gallons per bay GPCD-Gallons per Capita >er Day SENARIO # 1 SENARIO # 2 GALLONS PUMPED PER WELL# MINUTE (GPM) 1 1,300 2 1,300 4 1,800 5 1,750 6,150 GPM X 1,440 min/day 8.850 million gallons SENARIO # 2 SENARIO # 3 GALLONS PUMPED PER WELL# MINUTE (GPM) 4 1,800 5 1,750 3,550 GPM X 1,440 min/day 5.112 million gallons GALLONS PUMPED PER WELL# MINUTE (GPM) 1 or 2 1,300 4 1,800 5 1,750 4,850 GPM X 1,440 min/day 6.984 million gallons SENARIO # 3 GALLONS PUMPED PER WELL# MINUTE (GPM) 4 1,800 5 1,750 3,550 GPM X 1,440 min/day 5.112 million gallons City of Monticello REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) PROJECT NAME: Electrical Improvements to Well House 1 (_132 Broadway El and Well House 2 (209 Cedar Stj The City of Monticello is soliciting proposals/quotes for the following: Xcel Energy currently supplies a service drop to Well House 1 (132 Broadway E), consisting of 240v Delta 3 phase power. At the point of attachment to Well House 1, there are a set of current transformers mounted on the mast. On the load side of the current transformers there are service conductors feeding Well House 1 and an underground lateral feeding Well House 2, approximately 250' away. Each of the well houses have independent service equipment and Soft Starter equipment sized to accommodate a 100 HP motor. Due to higher water demands in the City of Monticello, it is necessary to run both of these motors simultaneously; something that has been avoided in the past due to service installation. It has been determined to comfortably run both wells simultaneously, these well houses need to have separate services. SCOPE OF WORK: Remove service lateral from Well House 1 feeding Well House 2 and establish an independent service at Well House 2. The incoming service shall be overhead; 400a 208v 3 phase fed from a new Xcel Energy pole located approximately 25 feet from the northeast corner of Well House 2. Supply and install an outdoor Milbank #U4911 -X -QT -BL 3 phase meter socket on the exterior east side of Well House 2. Penetrate a precast rooftop overhang, approximately 12" thick and install service mast of rigid steel conduit from the meter socket. Size length of the mast to accommodate NEC code restrictions on overhead wire clearances above public sidewalk areas and rooflines. Supply and install means of attachment to mast for Xcel Energy service conductor drop. Install guide wire for support of mast if the mast length exceeds a 60 to 40% ratio, 40% being above roof line. Supply and install a 400a 3 phase fusible WP manual transfer switch (MTS), Sq.D or approved equal, or exterior of building, between meter socket and existing service equipment. Allow for future wall space to accommodate electrical connection to portable generator system. Penetrate through an approximately 10" concrete/brick wall into existing service equipment. The lower portion of service equipment is 36" side by 24" high, empty area adequate for this install. City of Monticello REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) PROJECT NAME: Electrical Improvements to Well House 1 (_132 Broadway El and Well House 2 f209 Cedar St1 Ground and re -bond MTS as per NEC. Isolate neutrals from grounds within interior service equipment. Remove existing lugs from bus bar and discard. Supply 4 new tandem 250 MCM lugs for reattachment to bus bars after the bus bars have been thoroughly cleaned. Wire shall be parallel 3/0 copper THHN conductors for each phase and neutral. Due to voltage change to Well House 2 from 240v Delta to 208v Y, the Soft Start parameters will have to be reprogrammed to accommodate the increase on current values and decrease in voltage values. See Soft Start manual on site. NOTES: All Xcel Energy expense for new service hookup will be paid by the City of Monticello. Inspection and permit fees will be paid by contractor. Roof repair and patching around the mast is the responsibility of the contractor. Removal of existing service lateral and mast feeding Well House 2 is the responsibility of the contractor. Underground lateral to Well House 2 can be abandoned and left in place but no wire or conduit is to be visible above ground (remove the old mast from Well House 1 wall). Well House 1 shall maintain the 240v Delta 3 phase service currently in place. The contractor shall coordinate the new service install and hookup with Xcel Energy to minimize the downtime of Well #2 and acquire an accepted downtime schedule from the City of Monticello representatives. The Xcel Energy Contact person is Mike Pratt 763-273-7963. Alternate 1: Eliminate the overhead service drop equipment and add an underground service lateral approximately 30 feet to the Xcel Energy pole, in conduit, and approximately 30 feet vertically up the pole. Conduits shall be rigid steel at pole side location up the pole 8 feet. Rigid PVC schedule 80 may be used underground and stubbed into the meter. City of Monticello REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) PROJECT NAME: Electrical Improvements to Well House 1 (132 Broadway El and Well House 2 (209 Cedar Std. Please contact the following person or department for more information and specifications for the RFP: Name: Department: Phone and/or Cell: Email: Matt Theisen Water and Sewer Department 763-271-3274 or 763-370-7442 matt.theisen@ci.monticello.mn.us To submit an RFP or quote, the submission should be sealed and plainly marked with the project name on the sealed envelope. Proposals can be dropped off or mailed to the following address: City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street Suite 1 Monticello, MN 55362 Proposals are due by: (date/time) p2©i 7 Base bid amount: Alternate 1 amount: City of Monticello REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) PROJECT NAME: Electrical Improvements to Well House 1 (_132 Broadway El and Well House 2 (209 Cedar Stj NOTES The City of Monticello reserves the right to reject any or all Proposals, to waive technical specifications or deficiencies, and to accept any Proposal that it may deem to be in the best interest of the City. The Contractor must comply with all local and State laws, rules, and regulations; provide their state contractor licensing information, and provide proof of other licenses or certifications that might be required as a condition of the project. Contractor will be required to meet the insurance specifications as needed for the project and as required by law. It shall be the responsibility of the Contractor to supply all necessary tools, supplies and equipment to perform the work as requested. The Contractor shall invoice the City within 30 days of the completed project at the rates agreed to in the contract. The City shall make payment within 35 days of receipt of invoice unless other terms are written in the contract. The City of Monticello shall retain the right to terminate the contract with seven (7) days notice should the Contractor fail to perform work in a professional manner or perform the work within the demands and time constraints established by the City of Monticello. Failure to maintain necessary licenses and/or insurance coverage is grounds for termination of the Contract. The contract could be terminated upon mutual agreement between the Owner and the Contractor, provided that at least 30 days notice is given by either party prior to termination. Contractor will be required to indemnify the City against all suits, claims, judgments, awards, loss, cost or expense (including attorney's fees without limitation) arising in any way out of the Contractor's performance or non-performance of its obligations under the Service Contract. Contractor will defend all such actions with counsel satisfactory to Owner at its own expense, including attorney's fees, and will satisfy any judgment rendered against Owner in such action. 20. City Council Agenda: 6/26/17 Consideration of approving an outside cleaning service to clean citv buildings for $53,100 annually. (AM) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: We are asking that the City Council approve an outside commercial cleaning service to clean the following City buildings: Community Center, Library, City Hall, Senior Center, Prairie Center, and Head End. The Community Center currently manages several part-time Custodians and full-time Custodians and Maintenance Technicians to clean and maintain the above listed facilities at an average annual cost of $281,500. If we were to utilize a commercial cleaning service to replace our part-time custodians we could see a savings of $49,400 per year. The lowest bidder, Carefree Cleaning offers a 30 day written notice to cancel at any time. Our goal with utilizing a cleaning service is to decrease costs while increasing services and efficiencies. Quotes have been requested from three commercial cleaning companies and three quotes have been received. These quotes were received as follows: Quotes for Commercial Cleaning Services COMPANY DESCRIPTION TOTAL QUOTE ServiceMaster Commercial cleaning services $75,756.00 annually for Community Center, Library, City Hall, Senior Center, Prairie Center, and Head End Building Mid City Cleaning Commercial cleaning services $219,384.00 annually for Community Center, Library, City Hall, Senior Center, Prairie Center, and Head End Building Carefree Cleaning Commercial cleaning services $53,100.00 annually for Community Center, Library, City Hall, Senior Center, Prairie Center, and Head End Building Al. Budget Impact: By utilizing the cleaning service the City would save $49,400 annually on its custodial costs. City Council Agenda: 6/26/17 A2. Staff Workload Impact: We would eliminate our part-time custodial staff, therefore we would reduce the staff management hours for the Facilities Maintenance Supervisor to schedule, hire, and supervise part-time staff. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the commercial cleaning service for $53,100.00 annually by the lowest bidders as highlighted in green as identified in the previous table. 2. Motion to deny the commercial cleaning service. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the approval of the outside commercial cleaning service. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Cleaning Contracts/Estimates B. Estimated Costs Spreadsheet 2 Carefree Cleaning, LLC PO Box 579 Tel: (763)248-8414 Your Satisfaction is our Guarantee Elk River, MN 55330 www.carefreecleaning.co City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street, Suite 4 Monticello, MN. 55362 Att. Jerry Hanson Commercial Cleaning Services Proposal 5/27/2017 Head End - Job Saecifications Bathrooms: Clean / Disinfect mirror, sink, dispensers and walls Disinfect the entire toilet Check / Fill dispensers Empty trash, replace soiled liners and wipe spills from the waste baskets Sweep and mop the floors (including behind the toilet) Break Room: Empty trash, replace soiled liners and wipe spills from the waste baskets Sweep and mop floor Wipe sink and counter Wipe spills / stains from walls Main Area: Vacuumlehll rugs Empty trash, replace soiled liners and wipe spills from the waste baskets Sweep and mop hallways and offices As Needed: Wipe chair bottoms Detail floor corners and crevices using a crevice tool Detail (scour) sinks and toilets eliminating hard water rings and stains Carefree Cleaning, LLC PO Box 579 Your Satisfaction is our Guarantee Elk River, MN 55330 City of Monticello Commercial Cleaning Service Proposal Tel: (763)248-8414 www.carefreecleaning.co Prairie West - Job Saecifications Commons and FiberNet Wipe entry glass and entryway doors Empty trash, replace soiled liners and wipe spills from the waste baskets Dust all flat surfaces Sweep and mop tile entry Vacuum all carpeted areas (including hallways, stairs, elevator and entry rugs) Clean drinking fountains (if applicable) Wipe the inner elevator walls with stainless steel polish Bathrooms Wostairs and downstairs) Empty trash, replace soiled liners and wipe spills from the waste baskets Check /fill dispensers Clean mirrors, sinks, counter, walls and dispensers Disinfect entire toilet Sweep and mop floors As needed Squeegee entryway glass Detail (scour) sinks and toilets eliminating hard water rings and stains Detail carpeted and hard floor surface corners and crevices using a crevice tool Wipe chair bottoms Carefree Cleaning, LLC Po Box 579 Your Satisfaction is our Guarantee Elk River, MN 55330 City of Monticello Commercial Cleaning Service Proposal Bathrooms: Tel: (763)248-8414 www.carefreecleaning.co Senior Center - Job Saecifications Empty trash, replace soiled liners and wipe spills from the waste baskets Check / fill dispensers Clean mirror, sink, walls and dispensers Disinfect entire toilet Sweep and mop floors Pottery Room: Empty trash, replace solid liners and wipe spills from the waste baskets Sweep and mop floors Main Area: Empty trash, replace soiled liners and wipe spills from the waste baskets Dust all flat surfaces Vacuum all carpeted floors including Pam's office and reception area Mop tile floor (aware to mop under the garbage by the coffee) As needed: Detail (scour) sinks and toilets eliminating hard water rings and stains Detail carpeted and hard floor surface corners and crevices using a crevice tool Wipe chair bottoms Carefree Cleaning, LLC Po Box 579 Your Satisfaction is our Guarantee Elk River, MN 55330 City of Monticello Commercial Cleaning Service Proposal Main Area: Tel: (763)248-8414 www.carefreecleaning.co Citv Hall - Job Specifications Empty trash, replace soiled liners and wipe spills from the waste baskets Empty recyclables Dust all flat surfaces Clean entry windows / doors Vacuum all carpeted areas Break Room: Empty trash, replace soiled liners and wipe spills from the waste baskets Wipe down counter Wipe down table Wipe the face of the cabinets Vacuum all carpeted area Detail carpeted corners and crevices along the baseboard using a crevice tool Wipe spills and stains on walls Wipe chair bottoms TBD: Squeegee exterior windows Carefree Cleaning, LLC Po Box 579 Your Satisfaction is our Guarantee Elk River, MN 55330 City of Monticello Commercial Cleaning Service Gym: Tel: (763)248-8414 www.carefreecleaning.co Gvm - Job Soecifications Empty trash, replace soiled liners and wipe spills from the waste baskets Dust all flat surfaces Clean door frames and spot clean walls Clean and polish drinking fountains Sweep and mop the gym floor using the floor machine As Needed: Detail the floor edges using a backpack vacuum and a crevice attachment Carefree Cleaning, LLC Po Box 579 Your Satisfaction is our Guarantee Elk River, MN 55330 City of Monticello Commercial Cleaning Service Proposal Main Area: Tel: (763)248-8414 www.carefreecleaning.co Library - Job Specifications Empty trash, replace soiled liners and wipe spills from the waste baskets Dust all flat surfaces Vacuum all carpeted areas Sweep and mop all hard floor surfaces Break Room: Empty trash, replace soiled liners and wipe spills from the waste baskets Clean sink and counter Sweep and mop floors Sweep and mop halls Bathrooms: Empty trash, replace soiled liners and wipe spills from the waste basket Empty sanitary napkin receptacle Empty diaper receptacle Check / fill dispensers Clean mirror, sink and walls Clean toilets and urinals Sweep and mop floors As Needed: Detail floors corners and crevices using a backpack vacuum and a crevice tool Wipe chair bottoms Squeegee glass entry Detail (scour) sinks and toilets eliminating hard water rings and stains Carefree Cleaning, LLC Po Box 579 Your Satisfaction is our Guarantee Elk River, MN 55330 City of Monticello Commercial Cleaning Service Proposal Tel: (763)248-8414 www.carefreecleaning.co Communitv Center - Jobs Specifications Entrvways: Empty trash, replacing soiled liners and wiping spills from the waste baskets Clean glass doors Sweep and mop hard surface floors Vacuum rugs Partv Room: Wipe / dust any surfaces needed Sweep and mop the floor Front desk: Empty trash, replacing soiled liners and wiping spills from the waste baskets Sweep and mop hard surface floor Romn and Stoma. FYK and The Warehouse: Empty trash, replacing soiled liners and wiping spills from the waste baskets Dust all flat surfaces Sweep, mop or vacuum all floor surfaces Spot clean glass Main Lobbv Restrooms: Empty trash, replacing soiled liners and wiping spills from the waste baskets Clean mirrors, sinks, counters, dispensers and walls Check / fill dispensers Sanitize the toilets Carefree Cleaning, LLC PO Box 579 Your Satisfaction is our Guarantee Elk River, MN 55330 City of Monticello Commercial Cleaning Service Proposal Tel: (763)248-8414 www.carefreecleaning.co Communitv Center - Job Specifications Continued Boom Island. Bridae Room and Mississinni Room: Empty trash, replacing soiled liners and wiping spills from the waste baskets Dust all flat surfaces Sweep and mop or vacuum all floor surfaces Spot clean glass Hidden kitchen and back hallways: Empty trash, replacing soiled liners and wiping spills from the waste baskets Sweep and mop hard surface areas Dust all flat surfaces Main Lobbv: Empty trash, replacing soiled liners and wiping spills from the waste baskets Dust all flat surfaces Sweep and mop hard surface areas Vacuum rugs Spot clean glass Caroeted Hallway and Office: Empty trash, replacing soiled liners and wiping spills from the waste baskets Dust all flat surfaces Spot clean glass Vacuum all carpeted areas Carefree Cleaning, LLC Po Box 579 Your Satisfaction Is our Guarantee Elk River, MN 55330 City of Monticello Commercial Cleaning Service Proposal Tel: (763)248-8414 www.carefreecleaning.co Communitv Center - Job Specifications Continued r-TILI=-- Orra Detail floor corners and crevices using a backpack vacuum and a crevice tool Wipe chair bottoms Detail (scour) sinks and toilets eliminating hard water rings and stains Carefree Cleaning, LLC PO Box 579 Tel: (763)248-8414 Your Satisfaction is our Guarantee Elk River, MN 55330 www.carefreecleaning.co Service Aareement City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street, Suite 4 Monticello, MN 55362 Scone of Service A. Carefree Cleaning LLC. will furnish all labor and supervision. City of Monticello will supply the toilet paper, paper towels, tissue, hand soap and trash liners, cleaning equipment and cleaning chemicals required. B. Buildinas Serviced and Freauencv: 1. Head End: Cleaned on Tuesdays and Fridays 2. Prairie West: Cleaned on Tuesdays and Fridays 3. Senior Center: Cleaned on Mondays and Thursdays 4. City Hall: Cleaned on Tuesdays and Fridays 5. Gym: Cleaned on Tuesdays and Fridays (touched up daily) 6. Library: Cleaned on Mon, Tue, Wed, Thu, Fri, Sat 7. MCC: Cleaned seven days per week C. All work will be performed after business hours and completed before opening the following day. D. All work will be professionally performed with quality workmanship per specifications. E. Contractor employees will not be expected to work on Holidays observed by each individual building 1. Duration A. This written agreement contains the entire agreement between both parties. B. This agreement including pricing shall remain in effect for one year from the starting date and shall be renewable or renegotiated annually. C. Customer agrees to notify contractor of any complaints and allow time for prompt correction. D. Either party may terminate this agreement with a 30 day notice. Should a customer cancel without a 30 -day notice, Contractor will be entitled to a 30 -day service charge. 2. Leaal Responsibility A. Contractor agrees to maintain required liability and accidental insurance. Carefree Cleaning, LLC PO Box 579 Tel: (763)248-8414 Your Satisfaction is our Guarantee Elk River, MN 55330 www.carefreecleaning.co B. Contractor agrees to hold harmless customer from claims for injury, death, or property damage due to negligence or accident on part of the contractor, its employees or agents. C. Contractor agrees to employ safe and professionally accepted cleaning procedures. D. Customer agrees not to hire any worker or person employed by the contractor during the term of this agreement and for 365 days after the expiration of this agreement. E. Contractor is an Independent Contractor with control over its procedures, employees and agents. 3. Charae Per Buildina Head End $216.00 per month Prairie West $260.00 per month Senior Center $294.00 per month City Hall $294.00 per month Gym $166.00 per month Library $1005.00 per month Community Center $2190.00 per month A. Customer agrees to pay the contractor: $4.425.00 + sales tax per month Due on the 15th day of the following month. Additional Services offered shall be charged with the next billing cycle at a price of $25.00 an hour. 4. Billing A. Accounts shall be considered delinquent after the 1511 of the following month. A late charge of $30, collection fees (payable by customer) or cancellation of service may result if delinquency persists. B. If customer requests a change in frequency or coverage of service, a new price may be negotiated. C. If unforeseen events occur beyond the contractor's control (construction obstacles, natural calamities, major tax increase or national economic crisis) a new price may be negotiated. Customer Representative: Contractor: Date: Note: Verbal authorization by customer to commence work including issue of building keys implies agreement with the above terms including payment of proposed prices. This proposal is valid for 60 days. S'MiCLMASTER Clean, June 2, 2017 City of Monticello Jerry Hanson 505 Walnut Street Monticello, Mn. 55362 Dear Mr. Hanson: SW9° MMASTER SIZAA Restore e.;r Thank you for this opportunity to submit a janitorial cleaning proposal for your Monticello facilities (6) in Monticello, Minnesota. ServiceMaster would provide the following quotes per building/per department for your review: • Senior Center cleaned 2 x per week. • City Hall cleaned 2 x per week. • Head End cleaned 2 x per week. • Prairie West Building 2 x per week. • Library building 6 x per week • Community Center common areas & gym 2 x per week 7 x per week Monthly cost is $290.00 plus tax Monthly cost is $580.00 plus tax Monthly cost is $490.00 plus tax Monthly cost is $433.00 plus tax Monthly cost is $1430.00 plus tax Monthly cost is $3090.00 plus tax ServiceMaster would provide cleaning for all 6 sites... We would not be interested in splitting them up and providing only five or less facilities. The pricing would change (increase significantly per building) and would not be ideal for ServiceMaster to provide service profitably. ( Let me know if we are within your budget to continue the dialog for SM to provide service.) Expendable Items such as hand soap, toilet paper, paper towels garbage liners would be provided by City of Monticello. The Auto scrubber would also be provided by City of Monticello. ServiceMaster would provide back ground checks and training and supervision for ServiceMaster employee at each building. We at ServiceMaster look forward to partnering with you to provide a professional cleaning for your facilities in the Monticello area. ServiceMaster Professional Services Toll Free: 800-245-4622 13355 SO'h Av. N. Ste, 102 Fax: 763-444-1479 Plymouth, MN 55441 www.svmps.com Servicrosm Servicrosm Clean Restore 5CnYMNAMR Sincerely, Bradley P. Hegman Regional Commercial Account Manager ServiceMaster Professional Services Toll Free: 800-245-4622 13355 10th Av. N. Ste, 102 Fax: 763-444-1479 Plymouth, MN 55441 www.svmps.com Ann Mosack From: Sent: To: Subject: More info from Mid City Jerry Hanson Tuesday, June 20, 2017 8:14 AM Ann Mosack FW: Propsal From: Chad Weiers [mailto:chad@midcitycleaning.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 7:22 AM To: Jerry Hanson<jerry.hanson@ci.monticello.mn.us> Subject: Re: Propsal Based on or walk through I feel you need three full time employees and three part time employees. Sorry I'm downtown working on this sick time ordinance requirements for all downtown employers. I'll send the proposal when I get back to the office. Thankyou Chad Weiers Mid City Cleaning Chad(ca midcitvcleanina.com On Jun 20, 2017, at 7:05 AM, Jerry Hanson <ierry.hanson(caci.monticello.mn.us> wrote: Hi, Chad So how many full time and part time employees are we talking about? Can you email me the proposal? Thanks From: Chad Weiers fmailto:chad(o)midcitvcleanine.com] H 9 (e. 00 X 3 — 1Zf5$0O Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 6:57 AM t DO X ' /, To: Jerry Hanson <ierry.hanson(a)ci.monticello.mn.us> b�� 3 S W��• 00 Subject: Re: Propsal Hi Jerry t 1$J2—C4-2. Pm For every full time emplyee your monthly cost would be $4196.00 per a month plus sales tax . For every I rte+ ' " part time employee working four hours your cost would be $ 1898.00 per a month plus sales tax. I'm sorry I was not able to drop off the proposal in person. We can mail it if you want. Thank you Chad Weiers Mid City Cleaning 8000 University Ave NE 1 Maintenance and Custodial Staffing Costs Part-time Custodians/Maintenance Full-time Custodian (Grade 4) Full-time Maintenance Tech (Grade 9 -Step 8/Step 1) Full-time Maintenance Tech (Grade 9 -Step 3) Contract Cleaning Service Totals Note: Added 15K insurance and 15.15% for FICA/Medicare/PERA Current Costs (6/2017) $ 79, 500.00 $ 56,000.00 $ 78,000.00 $ 68,000.00 $ 281,500.00 Proposed Costs $ 47,000.00 $ 64,000.00 $ 68,000.00 $ 53,100.00 $ 232,100.00 2P. City Council Agenda: 06/26/2017 Consideration of approving the replacement of Community Center aquatic play structure by Recreation by Lemmie Jones for $99,765. (AM) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: City Council is asked to consider replacing the original aquatic play structure at the Community Center. A picture of the existing play structure is attached for the Council's reference. The play structure was painted last September as part of the pool maintenance shut down, but we are still having issues with the internal structure of the unit. The total expense of painting the structure was $2,350, which esthetically made the structure look great in the interim of the replacement, but issues with the play structure still remain. The base of the play structure is also very slippery and we have had several minor injuries from patron slips and falls on the structure. It also makes sense to replace the play structure at the same time as the pool re -plaster project, since removal of the structure will leave a foot print of the old plaster surface that will have to be repaired. Quotes have been requested from three contractors and three have been received for the play structure project. The goal is to have the entire project finished in September of the current year. These quotes were received as follows: Quotes for Aquatic Play Structure Replacement CONTRACTOR DESCRIPTION Aquatix Rain Drop Products (play structure only) and Badger Swimpools (removal and install only) Recreation by Lemmie Jones Removal of current structure and Installation of new aquatic play structure. Removal of current structure and Installation of new aquatic play structure Removal of current structure and Installation of new aquatic play structure TOTAL QUOTE $115,081.50 total package of play structure, removal and install $87,814.50 for play structure and $126,745 for removal and install for a total of $214,559.50 $99,765.00 total package of play structure, removal and install Al. Budget Impact: Amounts expended above the budget are financed through the MCC operations and maintenance fund balance (prior years accumulation of revenues in excess of expenditures). The current balance is over $700 K. This expenditure will help draw down this balance for a needed item. Please note that there are other maintenance items that will be needed in the next few years as noted on the attached summary which will further draw down this balance. A2. Staff Workload Impact: Staff time will include coordinating the temporary pool closure for the project and working with the contractor to finalize the project. City Council Agenda: 06/26/2017 B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the replacement of Community Center's aquatic play structure for $99,765.00 by the lowest bidders as highlighted in green as identified in the previous tables. 2. Motion to deny. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: 1. City Administrator and Community Center Director recommend Alternative 1 as the timing of play structure installation is done most efficiently if completed in conjunction with the pool resurfacing. 2. Finance Director recommends Alternative 2 based on other needs of the facility. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Picture B. Quotes C. List of possible future capital improvement projects 2 PROJECT QUOTE: Monticello, MN June 5th, 2017 (Quote Valid for 45 Days.) SPRAY • EQUIPMENT J y� n 1TI11Coynik a."a ' „ K A ' ;, Q Fun Deck Play Stricture: (1) 6' square Deck, 4' tall B .�„t.2ti;°��.� Hand jets c `°' "s� Radial Fan Jets D.iti-1 Foamy jets (Deck) ,54ar Radial Down jets F y"e2 ie Foot jets G ,'Z=`; ? Deck Pop jets Lt Radial Arching jets x 1v ,54ar Double Racer Slide Slide Pad K :1 ADA Accessible Stairs (Curved Landing) L 1 Cascading Water Table (2 -Way) M 1 Water Dome C 11 (Option #1) $99,765.00 Included 1 Stainless -Steel Manifold and Plumbing Package 1 Mounting & Assembly Hardware 1 Wrapping I Packing / Crating 1 Shipping (LTL - In Crates) to Job Site (F.O.B. Monticello, MN) 1 Installation n 1 � MEP (Mechanical, Electrical or Plumbing) &Stamped Engineering Drawings _ � }�y,,,.,K,fT is''w'i1e:W��Y.-vr;:..?rST.`-;ry-,S"irt'x"C.';:,W'S'?a4'?''cU' :sr^Y•�r�- _ _-_ �x(la":�;i,%.W.:c.:«%%. Included fScooe of Workl: Equipment Package as listed above, SS Manifold, Mounting & Assembly Hardware, Tear -Out of Existing Structure, Installation of New Structure, Stamped Submittal Drawings, Two Site Visits, Packaging & Crating, Freight to the Job Site, Un -Loading at the Job -Site Upon Delivery, O&M Manual & Manufacturer's Limited Liability Warranty. Not Included: M.E.P. - Mechanical, Electrical or Plumbing, Sales Tax, Union Fees, Prevailing Wage, Stub -Up Piping, Pump, In - Ground Plumbing Equipment or Labor, Electrical Equipment or Labor, Bid Bond, Performance Bond, Required Permits or Inspection Fees. Payment Terms: 50% Deposit Payment due upon Execution of Proposal, 40% Pre -Ship Payment due prior to shipping, & 10% After Commissioning sign -off by owner (Or 30 days after delivery if installation is delayed due to no fault of Recreation by Lemmie Jones, LLC, whichever is shorter). Payment Due Upon Receipt of Invoice. No warranties are valid until final payment is received. All payment terms are subject to credit approval from Recreation by Lemmie Jones, LLC. Lead -Time is 12-16 weeks and is based on receipt date of Deposit Payment I Color Selections I Signed Agreement I Work Load at the time order is finalized. Notes: Adequate site access to be provided to accommodate a Loader with Extendable Forks, Facility Shutdown required during Installation Process. It is agreed that Recreation by Lemmie Jones, LLC I Des1gn2Play, LLC shall be permitted to process our work without interruption or delay. The Owner hereby agrees that Recreation by Lemmie Jones, LLC will be reimbursed In full for all costs associated with any delays. These reimbursable costs include, but are not limited to, re -mobilization costs and equipment rental / deliveryfees. This agreement must become part of the final contractual agreement. w signing below yon agree to the terms and conditions of this agreement (Owner( Signature & Printed Name Date (Recreation by LI Signature & Printed Name Date Remit To: Recreation by Lemmie Jones, LLC 2112 Carrie Street Carthage, MO 64836 TE+1.417.793.1613 E-mail: lemmie@recreationbylemmiejones.com��` B■ www.recreationbvlemmleiones.com BY LEMMIE JONES LLC a �Y� .L Z wi C6 ro J � g eJ m 3 L1G u Lu 1 1 ice.--•��\ i / g � a o i ig t w , a v O Cqq L i v � o m 1 � w � z t 0 1 \ n t y m t , o � a m � H v a y W .Ai F" ''`i�I�'1■44�e NaY�ed97: �NaauNN o pe 0 -NL1_ 0 MU —00 W O a0¢0QryyFp e�OU ad . W G wigogcnamauu3 m n- A aquatix by landscape structures Dated: 6/20/2017 Project Name: Monticello Community Cntr. Prepared For: Ann Mosack Aquatix Proposal Number: 17249A-2 Community Center Director Phone: 763.271.3268 Dear Ann: Aquatix by Landscape Structure is pleased to provide a quote of products for the referenced project. This proposal is based on the information provided in the bid request. Detailed product specifications are attached. It is our understanding that Aquatix by Landscape Structures is to provide the following water play features for the above referenced project. Water Play Features QtV Description Unit Sales Price Final Sales Price 1 HydraHub1 $112,000.00 $112,000.00 2 4'x 6' Landing Pads $3,185.00 $6,370.00 Water play feature design notes: • All above water play features are to be the standard product of Aquatix by Landscape Structures. A Pricing Summary I Total Price for Equipment as described above: $118,370.00 Total Marketing Package Discount: ($17,755.50) Discount is valid if order is installed prior to Oct, 2017. Owner consents to allowing Aquatix to take marketing photo/video. Removal & Disposal of Existing SCS Strucure $7,855.00 Removal and disposal of existing SCS strucure. "Required plaster finish repair not included. Delivery and Installation of Structure: $6,612.00 Installation is for the new structure only and does not include removal or disposal of existing structure. Does not include pool floor refinish or repair if needed. Access to be provided for product and materials. No other work is included. Final Contract Amount: $115,081.50 *Quote is for product supply only. 'Aquatix by Landscape Structures offers operating system components at additional costs. I General Conditions *Terms of payment are 25% down with order and balance due prior to shipment. *Proposal is subject to the attached terms and conditions. *Proposal and pricing valid for 30 days. *This proposal and pricing is based on our interpretation of the sections of the RFP or specification that have been made available to us. Exceptions have been noted where ever possible. In the event of a conflict between the language in the specification and the proposal, the language in the proposal takes precedence and is the basis of the proposed pricing. Aquatix by Landscape Structures reserves the right to reject any order based on differences in pricing. Aquatix by Landscape Structures reserves the right to reject any order based on differences in interpretation of the specification, or for any reason, at the time an order is tendered. *Aquatix by Landscape Structures will not initiate work with out a fully executed contract or purchase order. Fabrication will not be initiated until complete submittal approvals have been received. *Submittals will be provided within two -three weeks of receipt of a fully executed contract or purchase *The proposed equipment can generally be shipped within 6-8 weeks after receipt of completely approved submittals. Lead time will be updated at the time of order execution. *Sales tax is not included in the prices quoted. All applicable Federal, State and Local sales or use taxes must be paid by the customer. *Freight is FOB Eden Prairie, MN. If you have any questions or comments concerning this information, please feel free to call me at 952- 345-6440. Thank you for the opportunity to bid on this project. Sincerely, Amy Altman Sales Manager Acceptance of Proposal PO Number: Client Name: Company: Bill To Address: Ship To Name/Address: "Purchase orders shall be addressed to Landscape Structures Phone Number: Install Name/Address (If Different From Ship to Address): Proposal Amount $ Sales Tax Amount $ Final Contract Amount $ (when applicable) ** Sales tax will be added to your invoice if no tax exempt or resale certificate is received Client Authorized Signature Print Date The signing of this proposal hereby authorizes the client's acceptance of the above work as described. The client has read, understands and agrees with the terms and conditions of this proposal. 601 7th Street South Delano, MN 555328 9 landscape structures, �J.iY�ydE i41 liln '.I li..anlili it .d la. euea'i._le gni I u. ii,il iu,u•.0 i i ii, W D t' iowN A_w0 NNr —i v o o H S mRd N —� aN 3 mV�0OF oN o@ C=D --i3 rC� x xp j ou�'im r �o -0 O C/J i Badger Swimpools CONSTRUCTING INNOVATIVE AQUATIC FACILITIES June 20, 2017 City of Monticello Ms. Ann Mosack 505 Walnut Street #4 Monticello MN Re: Proposal to install a Rain -drop Typhoon structure at the Monticello Community Center, Monticello, MN. Dear Ann: We are pleased to provide a proposal for installing a Typhoon play feature in the activity pool of the Monticello Community Center, Monticello, MN. We do not include the cost for engineering work and/or for any state/local approvals for work. All work will be completed according to Minnesota building and swimming pool codes. We propose to furnish all materials, labor and equipment necessary to complete the following work: • Remove the existing SCS feature • Saw cut and remove a portion of the pool floor • Reroute piping as required • Repour the pool floor • Plaster the new concrete • Install the Typhoon play feature Total: $126,745 This proposal does not include • Plan Generation or State submittal • Pool mechanical work (including: pump replacement) • Electrical bonding • Draining, filling or balancing the pool All standard general requirements and administration is included in the costs above. This proposal is valid for 30 days from the above date. Please call our office at (608) 643-6440 with any questions or if you wish to proceed. We look forward to working with you and thank you very much. Sincerely yours, BADGER SWIMPOOLS, INC. Robert E. Jelinek, P.E. bielinek Owbad2crswimpools.com Badger Swimpools, Inc.* N789 Golf Road, Prairie do Sac, WI 53578 *Pit: 608-643-6440; Fx: 608-643-3732 ••r`�Pl'OdUdS,LLC Date: To: Purchaser: Billing Address: 6/19/2017 Ann Mosack City of Monticello Community Center 505 Walnut Street #4 Monticello, MN 55362 PROPOSAL Reference: Project Name: Salesperson: 1563311 City of Monticello WaterPlay S EHER First Shipment Address: Quantity Item # Item Description 1.00 /TYPHOON7-107 TYPHOON STRUCTURE 1.00 SITE SERVICE -STANDARD -001 SITE SERVICE -STANDARD VISIT INSTALLATION SUPERVISION SUPPORT Unit Price $92,655.00 $2,500.00 Extended Amt $92,655.00 $2,500.00 Total Order $95,155.00 Less discount at a rate of 10.00% -$9,265.50 Freight $1,925.00 N.TPA AWARDED' Taxes - See General Terms, Conditions and Warranty $0.00 4 CONTRACT Net Order $87,814.50 Inquire about our nationwide cooperative purchasing programsl Payment Terms: Net 30 Estimated Delivery Date upon placement of Order: 12-16 weeks See the following pages for General Terms, Conditions and Warranty related to this Proposal 2121 Cottage St. Ashland, Ohio 44805 • Phone 800-343-6063 • Fax 419-496-0711 • www.rain-drop.com 01 ��Pr,odLICBILC PROPOSAL Reference: Project Name: Salesperson: 1563311 City of Monticello WaterPlay S EHER GENERAL TERMS, CONDITIONS AND WARRANTY 1) Purchase: By executing this proposal (the "Proposal"), or submitting a purchase order pursuant to this Proposal (which shall incorporate the terms of this Proposal into such purchase order specifically by reference) which is accepted by Rain Drop Products, LLC ("Rain Drop") the purchaser identified above ("you" or the "Purchaser") agrees to purchase the products as detailed in this Proposal (the "Products"), or in the purchase order accepted by Rain Drop, for use by Purchaser or for installation by Purchaser on behalf of a third -party who will be the ultimate owner of the features and/or equipment (the ultimate owner of the features and/or equipment, whether Purchaser or a third -party, being the "Owner"). 2) Proposal: The above proposal is valid for sixty days from the date first set forth above. After sixty days Rain Drop reserves the right to increase prices due to the rise in costs of raw material, fuel or other cost increases, 3) Short Shin Claims: Purchaser has fifteen days from receipt of the Products to file a short ship report in writing to its sales representative. Rain Drop will not honor claims made after this time. 4) Standard Exclusions: Unless specifically included and detailed in this Proposal , this Proposal does not include, and Rain Drop will not provide services, labor or materials for any of the following work: (a) removal or disposal of any materials containing asbestos or any hazardous materials as defined by the EPA; (b) moving Owner's property around the installation site; (c) repair or replacement of any materials supplied by Purchaser or Owner; (d) repair of concealed underground utilities not located on prints, supplied to Rain Drop by Owner during the bidding process, or physically staked out by Owner, and which are damaged during construction; or (e) repair of damage to existing surfaces that could occur when construction equipment and vehicles are being used in the normal course of construction. 5) Bonding Guidelines: If Purchaser uses or provides the Products for an Owner other than Purchaser (including, without limitation, as a subcontractor of Purchaser), Purchaser will include the following statement in Purchaser's contract with Owner: "The manufacturer's warranty for the Rain Drop Products brand water components is a separate document between Rain Drop Products, LLC and the ultimate owner of the Rain Drop brand water components, which will be provided to the ultimate owner at the time of final shipment for products manufactured by Rain Drop . Due to surety requirements, any performance and/or payment bond will cover only the first year of Rain Drop Products, LLC warranty." 6) Insurance Reaulrements: Rain Drop will not provide any insurance coverage in excess of its standard insurance, a copy of which is available for your review priorto acceptance of this Proposal. 7) Payment Terms of payment are defined in the "Payment Terms" section of this Proposal and are specific to this contract.. All payments must be made to Rain Drop Products, LLC, 2121 Cottage Street, Ashland, Ohio 44805. If the Purchaser or Owner fails or delays in making any scheduled milestone payments, Rain Drop may cease continued manufacturing until such payments with penalties are made, or Rain Drop may be relieved of its obligations hereunder if payment is more than sixty days past due. Rain Drop shall be entitled to certain payments previously made as liquidated damages. Rain Drop may use all remedies available to it under current laws, including but not limited to filing of liens against the property and using a collection agency or the courts to secure the collection of the outstanding debt. All payments made pursuant to the installment payment process shall not be available to be recovered by 2121 Cottage St. Ashland, Ohio 44805 • Phone 800-343-6063 • Fax 419-496-0711 • www.rain-drop.com 8) Taxes: Unless otherwise specifically included and detailed in this Proposal, prices do not include any taxes, including sales, use or excise taxes. It is the Purchaser's responsibility to furnish evidence of any sales tax exemption in the appropriate states and have compliance documents, where applicable, on file at Rain Drop. 9) Lien Releases: Upon request by Owner, Rain Drop will issue appropriate partial lien releases as corresponding payments are received from Purchaser, but prior to receiving final payment from Purchaser or Owner. Rain Drop will provide a full release of liens upon receipt of final payment. In accordance with state laws, Rain Drop reserves the right to place a lien on the property if final payment has not been received ten days prior to the filing deadline for liens. 10) Site -Dian Aooroval. Permits. Permit Fees. Plans. Engineering Drawings and Surveving: Site -plan approval, permits, permit fees, plans, engineering drawings and surveying are specifically excluded from this Proposal unless specifically detailed herein. Rain Drop does not in any way warrant or represent that a permit or site plan approval for construction will be obtained. 11) Manufacturing & Deliverv: Manufacturing lead-time from Rain Drop's receipt of this Proposal executed by Purchaser, or submittal by Purchaser of a purchase order pursuant to this Proposal (which shall incorporate the terms of this Proposal specifically by reference) which is accepted by Rain Drop is approximately twelve (12) to sixteen (16) weeks depending on the size and complexity of the components ordered. 12) Changes In the Work: During the course of this project, Purchaser may order changes consisting of additions and deductions in the work. The cost of these changes will be determined by Rain Drop, and a change order form must be completed and signed by both Purchaser and Rain Drop , which will detail the scope of the change order. Should any change order be essential to the completion of the project, and the Purchaser refuses to authorize such change order, then Rain Drop will be deemed to have performed its part of the project, and the project will be terminated. Upon such termination, Rain Drop will submit a final billing to Purchaser for payment, less a labor allowance for work not performed but including additional charges incurred due to the stoppage. No credit will be allowed for materials sold and supplied, which will remain the property of Purchaser. 13) Restocking Fee There will be a 30% restocking fee applied to all Products returned by Purchaser. Prior approval must be obtained from Rain Drop before any product is to be returned. All returns are at Rain Drop's discretion. 14) Limited Warrantv The limited warranties of Rain Drop Products LLC (collectively, the "Limited Warranty") are as follows: 5 Year Product Limited Warrantv. Rain Drop warrants that the Products are warranted for five years from date of shipment against any defects in material or workmanship under normal use and service. This warranty does not cover normal wear and tear, improper operation or improper installation of any Rain Drop Product. 25 Year Product Limited Warrantv. In addition, the fiberglass reinforced plastic ("FRP") furnished with any Product has a twenty-five year warranty from the date of shipment against rust and corrosion only. 2121 Cottage St. Ashland, Ohio 44805 • Phone 800-343-6063 • Fax 419-496-0711 • www.rain-drop.com PROPOSAL P PO d Ll C t S, L L C Reference: 1563311 Project Name: City of Monticello WaterPlay S Salesperson: EHER Purchaser so long as Rain Drop Products is not in default under the agreement. 8) Taxes: Unless otherwise specifically included and detailed in this Proposal, prices do not include any taxes, including sales, use or excise taxes. It is the Purchaser's responsibility to furnish evidence of any sales tax exemption in the appropriate states and have compliance documents, where applicable, on file at Rain Drop. 9) Lien Releases: Upon request by Owner, Rain Drop will issue appropriate partial lien releases as corresponding payments are received from Purchaser, but prior to receiving final payment from Purchaser or Owner. Rain Drop will provide a full release of liens upon receipt of final payment. In accordance with state laws, Rain Drop reserves the right to place a lien on the property if final payment has not been received ten days prior to the filing deadline for liens. 10) Site -Dian Aooroval. Permits. Permit Fees. Plans. Engineering Drawings and Surveving: Site -plan approval, permits, permit fees, plans, engineering drawings and surveying are specifically excluded from this Proposal unless specifically detailed herein. Rain Drop does not in any way warrant or represent that a permit or site plan approval for construction will be obtained. 11) Manufacturing & Deliverv: Manufacturing lead-time from Rain Drop's receipt of this Proposal executed by Purchaser, or submittal by Purchaser of a purchase order pursuant to this Proposal (which shall incorporate the terms of this Proposal specifically by reference) which is accepted by Rain Drop is approximately twelve (12) to sixteen (16) weeks depending on the size and complexity of the components ordered. 12) Changes In the Work: During the course of this project, Purchaser may order changes consisting of additions and deductions in the work. The cost of these changes will be determined by Rain Drop, and a change order form must be completed and signed by both Purchaser and Rain Drop , which will detail the scope of the change order. Should any change order be essential to the completion of the project, and the Purchaser refuses to authorize such change order, then Rain Drop will be deemed to have performed its part of the project, and the project will be terminated. Upon such termination, Rain Drop will submit a final billing to Purchaser for payment, less a labor allowance for work not performed but including additional charges incurred due to the stoppage. No credit will be allowed for materials sold and supplied, which will remain the property of Purchaser. 13) Restocking Fee There will be a 30% restocking fee applied to all Products returned by Purchaser. Prior approval must be obtained from Rain Drop before any product is to be returned. All returns are at Rain Drop's discretion. 14) Limited Warrantv The limited warranties of Rain Drop Products LLC (collectively, the "Limited Warranty") are as follows: 5 Year Product Limited Warrantv. Rain Drop warrants that the Products are warranted for five years from date of shipment against any defects in material or workmanship under normal use and service. This warranty does not cover normal wear and tear, improper operation or improper installation of any Rain Drop Product. 25 Year Product Limited Warrantv. In addition, the fiberglass reinforced plastic ("FRP") furnished with any Product has a twenty-five year warranty from the date of shipment against rust and corrosion only. 2121 Cottage St. Ashland, Ohio 44805 • Phone 800-343-6063 • Fax 419-496-0711 • www.rain-drop.com in�Di�op® � 0* "P1'0dL1CtS,LLC PROPOSAL Reference: Project Name: Salesperson: 1563311 City of Monticello WaterPlay S EHER Original Manufacturer Warrantv. With respect to equipment not manufactured by Rain Drop but used in conjunction with any Product, any applicable warranty is covered by the original manufacturer of such equipment and not by Rain Drop. This equipment includes, but is not limited to filtration, chlorination and re- circulation equipment. This warranty is in lieu of all other warranties express or implied. All claims, questions and inquiries should be directed to the original manufacturer. Limitations on Warranty Limited Remedv. The remedy for breach of Rain Drop's Limited Warranty as described above is limited to the replacement or repair of any Product which is determined to be defective under the reasonable judgment of Rain Drop. Further, the warranty coverage is only for that Product that has been properly installed and maintained accordingto the instructions provided by Rain Drop. Discovery of Defect. In the event of any defective Product covered under this Limited Warranty, written notice of such defect must be delivered to Rain Drop at the following address: Rain Drop Products, LLC 2121 Cottage Street Ashland, Ohio 44805 within the warranty period and within fifteen days after such defect is discovered. Upon confirmation that the defect exists, Rain Drop will, within a reasonable period of time, replace or repair the defective Product. Rain Drop shall not be liable for the shipping cost of returning any claimed defective Product to Rain Drop or for shipping costs of replacement materials. Rain Drop has the ultimate discretion to determine whether a defect exists and whether to replace or repair such defect. Disclaimer of Warranties. ALL OTHER CONDITIONS, REPRESENTATIONS, AND WARRANTIES, WHETHER EXPRESS, IMPLIED, STATUTORY OR OTHERWISE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY IMPLIED WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, ARE HEREBY DISCLAIMED BY RAIN DROP TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW. If the foregoing disclaimer of additional warranties is not given full force and effect, any resulting additional warranty shall be limited in duration to the express warranties and be otherwise subject to and limited by the terms of Rain Drop's warranty set forth above. Limitation of Liability. To the extent permitted by law, Rain Drop shall in no event be liable in connection with its products for (a) any indirect, special, incidental, liquidated or consequential damages, based on tort, contract or other 2121 Cottage St. Ashland, Ohio 44805 • Phone 800-343-6063 • Fax 419-496-0711 • www.rain-drop.com PROPOSAL - oo, P p 0 d U � t S, L L Reference: 1563311 Project Name: City of Monticello WaterPlay S Salesperson: EHER legal theory, whether or not advised of the possibility of such damages, or (b) any damages whatsoever in excess of an amount equal to the purchase price for such product. The right to recover damages within the limitations specified herein is the purchaser's exclusive alternative remedy in the event that the remedy provided herein fails of its essential purpose. Effective Date and Reservation of Rights. This Limited Warranty is dated as of March 1, 2012 and supersedes and replaces any previous warranties. Rain Drop reserves the right to revise, amend or modify this Limited Warranty at any time and in any manner without obligation to notify any individual or entity. 15) Indemnification: To the fullest extent permitted by law, Purchaser shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless Rain Drop and its consultants, agents and employees or any of them from and against claims, damages, losses and expenses, including but not limited to attorneys' fees, related to the installation of products manufactured and supplied by Rain Drop , provided that such claim, damage, loss or expense is attributable to bodily injury to, sickness, disease or death of a person or to injury to or destruction of tangible property, but only to the extent caused by the negligent acts or omissions of the Purchaser or its agents, employees, or subcontractors or anyone directly or indirectly employed by them or anyone for whose acts they may be liable, regardless of whether or not such claim, damage, loss or expense is caused in part by a party indemnified hereunder. Such obligation shall not be construed to negate, abridge or reduce other rights or obligations of indemnity that would otherwise exist as to a party or person described in this Section.. 16) Intellectual Pmoertv RI¢hts Purchaser acknowledges and agrees that Rain Drop will remain the owner of any and all intellectual property rights, including, but not limited to, copyrights, service marks, and trademarks in, on orto the Products. 17) Assemblv/Installation: Rain Drop does not provide installation services. If requested and specifically detailed in this Proposal, construction site services are intended to imply supervision and consulting services only. All labor required for the assembly, construction or removal of Products manufactured and supplied by Rain Drop will be the Purchaser's and/or Owner's responsibility. 18) Site/Use Review by Purchaser: Rain Drop relies on the Purchaser to determine that the Products are appropriate and safe for the Owner's installation site and/or intended use. 19) Disoute Resolution: Any controversy or claim arising out of or related to this Proposal must be settled by binding arbitration administered in Ashland, Ohio by a single arbitrator selected by the parties or by the American Arbitration Association, and conducted in accordance with the construction industry arbitration rules. Judgment upon the award may be entered in any court havingjurisdiction thereof. 20) Entire Agreement: No Reliance: This Proposal, if accepted by Purchaser, represents and contains the entire agreement between the parties. Prior discussion or verbal representations by the parties that are not contained in this Proposal are not part of this Proposal. Purchaser hereby acknowledges that it has not received or relied upon any statements or representations by Rain Drop or its agents which are not expressly stipulated herein, including. without 2121 Cottage St. Ashland, Ohio 44805 • Phone 800-343-6063 • Fax 419-496-0711 • www.rain-drop.com PROPOSAL in4Di-,oFY y•'"'�PPOdL1CtS,LLC Reference: 1563311 Project Name: City of Monticello WaterPlay S Salesperson: EHER limitation any statements as to the Products, warranties provided hereunder 21) No Third -Party Beneficiaries: This Proposal, if accepted by Purchaser, creates no third party rights or obligations between Rain Drop and any other person, including any Owner who is not also a purchaser. It is understood and agreed that the parties do not intend that any third party should be a beneficiary of this Proposal. 22) Governing law: The Proposal will be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Ohio. Notwithstanding any other law or venue available in any country or jurisdiction, the parties specifically reject all other venues and jurisdictions other than the United States of America, State of Ohio. 23) Assignment: Purchaser may not assign this Proposal, by operation of law or otherwise, without the prior written consent of Rain Drop. The Proposal, if accepted by Purchaser, shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of Rain Drop and the Purchaser, and their successors and permitted assigns. 24) Miscellaneous: Rain Drop objects to the inclusion of any different or additional terms in Purchaser's acceptance of this Proposal and if such terms are included in Purchaser's acceptance, Purchaser agrees that a contract of sale will nevertheless result only on the original terms stated in this Proposal. If any portion of this Agreement shall be declared invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. This Agreement shall be binding upon the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, either of which may be deemed an original, but all of which shall constitute one and the same document. Each person executing this Agreement for and on behalf of Purchaser represents and warrants that that person has the authority to execute this Agreement and all corporate action necessary to authorize the execution delivery of this Agreement. 2121 Cottage St. Ashland, Ohio 44805 • Phone 800-343-6063 • Fax 419-496-0711 • www.rain-drop.com 0 PROPOSAL PI'OdLICtS,LLC Reference: Project Name: Salesperson: Executed to be effective as of the date executed by the Company: PURCHASER: Signature: By: (Print Name) Title: Date: 1563311 City of Monticello WaterPlay S EHER 2121 Cottage St. Ashland, Ohio 44805 • Phone 800-343-6063 • Fax 419-496-0711 • www.rain-drop.com R J \ f \ E-A § { a /\; aJ� ,\ KA R 6` N M 0 9\ m + � B — —< G®) \ r)� \b $\} C I)&( �( - () ) P-1—DE: $ $ ! \ \( \ \ \\ � ....... .. IN M <\ /§,.> �§(( 4 ) ! �~ B — —< \ r)� C / P-1—DE: \ B R M-9 U 2 t, I N Em B §�) \\ !\$} -b®} t=§! \/ (] ) \\ \ / _, \( \ ( §/ « CD §i S -- - - - - - - - -| ± !]) { & \ 2 /§ B Possible Future Capital Improvement Projects for the Community Center • Surveillance Cameras and Card Access Reader Installation • New Recreation/Facility Software • New Patio in Wheel Park Area • Waterslide Replacement • Flooring Replacement • Mechanical Updates/Recommission • Front Counter/Concessions Replacement • Possible Roof Repairs Please note: The ending 2016 MCC fund balance (reserve) was $761,829 WU A. City Council Agenda: 06/26/2017 Consideration of approving the plaster resurfacing of the pool vessel at the Communitv Center by Northern Pool Resotration at a cost of $79,653.29. (AM) REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: City Council is asked to consider resurfacing the pool vessel of the Community Center per the improvement plan provided to the City Council at the MCC budget presentation. The pool vessel is in need of resurfacing and it is not recommended that we wait another year to complete this project. Pictures of the existing pool vessel are attached for the Council's reference. Quotes have been requested from several contractors and three have been received for the plaster resurfacing project. The goal is to have the entire project finished in September of the current year. These quotes were received as follows: Quotes for Pool Vessel Plaster Resurfacing Work CONTRACTOR DESCRIPTION Northern Pool Restoration Horizon Commercial Pool Supply Global Specialty Resurface lap pool, activity pool, and plunge pool. Polish two, 8 foot diameter spas. Resurface lap pool, activity pool, and plunge pool. Resurface lap pool, activity pool, and plunge pool. TOTAL QUOTE $79,653.29 $80,335.00 $139,780.00 Al. Budget Impact: Amounts expended above the budget are financed through the fund balance (prior year accumulation of revenues in excess of expenditures). This project will be funded through the Community Center's fund balance, since the 2017 budget has been expended for building improvements. A2. Staff Workload Impact: Staff time will include coordinating the temporary pool closure for the project and working with the contractor to finalize the project. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the plaster resurfacing of the pool vessel for $79,653.29 by the lowest bidders as highlighted in green as identified in the previous tables. 2. Motion to deny. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends Alternative 1. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Pictures B. Quotes ce: City Council Agenda: 06/26/2017 �llorthern Pool Restoratlan Northern Pool Restoration, LLC 1491 92nd Lane NE Blaine, MN 55449 P.763-762-8198 F.763-208-0847 Item/Cost Code 17041 Monticello Community Pool Description 1 Resurface lap pool, activity pool, and plunge pool 2 Polish two 8 foot diameter spas Re -surface Indoor Pools as Follows: Proposal 04/23/17 Job Number: 17041 Project Location Monticello Community Pool 505 Walnut Street Monticello, MN 55362 Amount 75,790.90 3,862.39 Grand Total: 79,653.29 1. Remove existing step trim tile, racing lane tile, and transition lines. 2. Chip down several inches below existing waterline tile and around inlets. 3. Clean pool thoroughly to prep for bond coating. 4. Install a bonded plaster base coat and let cure. 5. Install new blue 2" wide (2x2 -bullnose) step trim tile. (Owner to choose from our samples) 6. Install 2" wide white transition lines where needed to allow for multiple days of plastering. 7. Install new blue 12" wide racing lanes, 6" wide belly band, and tile accents (per existing). 8. Install a smooth troweled "Blue" Pearl Bright plaster finish. Notes 1)Bid is based on pool being sound and not needing additional preparation such as Jack hammering or sandblasting. If additional preparation is needed there will be extra costs. We will not proceed with work involving extra costs without written approval from owner. 2) Bid does not include any crack repair. 3) Owner to be responsible for filling the pool with water, all start-up procedures and balanced water chemistry. We propose hereby to furnish material and labor - complete in accordance with the above specifications, for the sum of: $79,653.29 Payment to be made as follows: 50% Down; The final 50% drawl to be paid within 30 days of our work completion. All matedal is guaranteed to be as specified. All work to be completed in a professional manner according to standard practices. Any alteration or deviation from above specifications Involving extra costs will be executed only upon written orders, and will become an extra charge over and above the estimate. All agreements are contingent upon strikes, accidents or delays beyond our control. Authorized ACCEPTANCE OF PROPOSAL -The above prices, specifications and Conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted. You are authorized to do the work as specified. Payment will be made as outlined above. Signature Signature NOTE: This proposal may be Date of Acceptance: withdrawn by us if not accepted within days. Report 6-1-11-19 04/23/17 Randy Page 1 of 1 11:22 AM To: City Of Monticello Address: 505 Walnut St. Monticello, MN 55362 Project Name: Monticello Community Center Pool Replaster Project Location: Monticello Community Center Swimming Pool, Monticello, MN Line # Item Description General Conditions Demolition New Finishes Notes: • Building Permit included • Price includes removal of delaminated plaster • New tile Included • Owner fill and balance pool • Taxes not included ACCEPTED: The above prices, specifications and conditions are satisfactory and hereby accepted. Buyer: Signature: Date of Acceptance: Contact: Phone: Fax: Bid Number: Bid Date: Ann Mosack 763-395-2954 763-295-4404 4/24/2017 Total Bid Price: $139,780.00 CONFIRMED: Global Specialty Contractors, Inc. Authorized Signature: Estimator: Zach Brazier (651) 406-8232 zbrazler@globalspecialty.net 4/27/2017 11:28:25 AM Page 1 of 1 Quoted to: Monticello Community Center 505 Walnut St. Monticello, MN 55362 2125 ENERGY PARK DRIVE, ST. PAUL, MN 55108 W WW.HORIZONPOOLSUPPLY.COM 1-800-969-0454 LOCAL 651-917-3075 FAX 651-917-3087 Customer Proposal / Quotation Contact 1: Ann Mosack Contact 2: Phone: (763)295-2954 Fax: (763)271-7105 Description: MON04 Resurface INDOOR Swimming Pool as follows: Pool: Aquatic Center Pool HORIZ N COMMERCIAL POOL SUPPLY Date: 6115117 Good Through: 7130117 Quote #: 20170615 MON04 Quotedby., Jason Gillet HYDRA Z0_ - Saw cut and chip under water line tile and all fittings as necessary. - Chip out any hollow spots in plaster (up to 10 sq. ft.) - Clean pool to prepare for bond coating. - Install a bonded base coat. - Install necessary safety centerline and step border tiles in contrasting color. - Install a premium, smooth troweled Aquavations Hydrazzo "Grecian White" pool plaster wl blue exposed aggregate (or equivalent) finish (additional colors available upon request for additional charge). NOTES: • Please read & initial attached Proposal Notes. Depth tilesimarkings, drain covers, and other fittings are excluded unless otherwise specified. Excludes draining and filling of pool unless otherwise specified. OPTION: • Fill pool with pre-treated, chemically balance water. Highly recommended in areas of hard water. Add $375 per 5,000 gallons of water and initial here Pricing: Quantity Item Number Description Resurface swimming pool as specified. ACCEPTANCE OF PROPOSAL — I am authorized to sign on behalf of the owner and I have read the attached Terms & Conditions and Proposal Notes and the above prices, specifications and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted. You are authorized to do the work as specified. Payment(s) will be made as specified. Quote Accepted By: Date: Authorized Signature: Unit Price 80,335.00 Total Price Total: I $80,335.00 $80,335.00 1 1 1 1 1 1 • Products and equipment used to complete job are subject to applicable stale & city sales taxes. • Quotes exceeding $2,000 will require a payment of 50% upon quote acceptance and the remainder is due Net 10 Days. • Please read all attached Terms & Conditions, Proposal Notes, and product information. This quote, once signed, is a contract between Horizon Commercial Pool Supply & the property owner. Page 2 of 6 City Council Agenda: 6/26/17 2R. Consideration of approving pavment of sick time balances, estimated at $81,760, into the MN State Healthcare Savings Plan for Union emplovees transitioning to the city's PTO plan. A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: City Council is asked to consider approving payment of sick time balances, estimated at $81,760, into the MN State Healthcare Savings Plan for Union employees transitioning to the city's paid time off (PTO) plan. At the 2017 contract negotiations earlier this year the Union employees agreed to consider and vote on adopting the PTO program in 2017 separate from the contract negotiations. A vote was held on June 1St and the by a vote of 8-5 the employees voted to accept the PTO program as proposed. The union program is identical PTO program adopted in 2016 for non-union employees including the 50% payout of sick time balances into the MN State Healthcare Savings Plan. Al. Budget Impact: The anticipated cost under to transition all Union employees to the PTO system will be approximately $81,760 based on sick time balances as of June 9, 2017. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve payment of sick time balances, estimated at $81,760, into the MN State Healthcare Savings Plan for Union employees transitioning to the city's PTO plan. 2. Motion to deny payment of sick time balances into the MN State Healthcare Savings Plan for Union employees transitioning to the city's PTO plan. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Personnel Committee and Staff recommend Alternative #1. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • Copy of PTO policy Paid Time Off (PTO) — Hired after 12/31/1990 Paid time off (PTO) provides all full-time and part-time benefited employees with paid time away from work that can be used for any purpose. PTO must be scheduled in advance and have supervisory approval, except in the case of illness or emergency. The PTO policy takes the place of vacation and sick leave. PTO does not replace pay for City observed holidays, jury duty, or military leave. Transition to PTO (hired prior to 12/31/2015) Vacation balances as of 12/31/15 will be converted to PTO hours on an hour for hour basis on January 1, 2016. Example: Vacation balance as 12/31/15 + Annual PTO = PTO balance as of 1/1/2016 Sick balances as of 12/31/15 will be paid out at 50% into the MN State Healthcare Savings Plan (HCSP). Remaining sick time hours after payment will be transferred to an Extended Medical Bank (EMB). Extended Medical Benefit (EMB) Any remaining sick hours after payment into the HCSP will be placed in an EMB which provides income protection insurance for employees in case of a serious illness. EMB hours may be used after the first forty (40) consecutive work hours of an absence for a Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA) qualifying leave. This benefit is meant as insurance. There is no additional accrual to this bank and it is not paid out upon termination. Types of PTO Leave 1. Planned PTO is requested and approved prior to the date the employee is taking off. 2. Unplanned PTO is time off reported on the date the employee will not be reporting to work. When leave is unplanned, the employee must notify their supervisor within one hour of the employees scheduled work day, or if the employee is already at work, the employee must notify their supervisor prior to leaving work. Unplanned leave may be denied if it would result in the department not being able to meet minimum staffing levels unless the absence is due to illness. If an employee's use of unplanned leave indicates a pattern suggesting abuse that interferes with the minimum staffing levels or the ability of the department to conduct business appropriately, the supervisor shall notify the employee. If such abuse continues the employee may be subject to denial of unplanned leave or disciplinary action. Medical Certification Good attendance is an essential job function for all City employees, if unplanned absences exceed 3 days, a doctor's certification may be required. Annual PTO Schedule Non -Exempt (Hourly): Less than 6 years 128 hrs/16 days 6 thru 10 years 168 hrs/21 days 11-24 years 224 hrs/28 days 25 years 232 hrs/29 days 26 years 240 hrs/30 days 27 years 248 hrs/31 days 28 years 256 hrs/32 days 29 years 264 hrs/33 days 30 years 272 hrs/34 days Exempt (Salaried): Less than 8 years 168 hrs/21 days 8 -24 years 224 hrs/28 days 25 years 232 hrs/29 days 26 years 240 hrs/30 days 27 years 248 hrs/31 days 28 years 256 hrs/32days 29 years 264 hrs/33 days 30 years 272 hrs/34 days The hours listed above are 50% for part-time benefited employees (30-35 hours per week). PTO hours will be placed in the employees bank on January 1 st of each year based on time with the City as of January 1St of each year. Example: An hourly employee who celebrates their 10 year anniversary on June 6th will receive 168 hours the following January 1St plus an additional 28 hours (56 hrs./12 mo.*6 mo.) of prorated PTO for a total of 196 hours. Mid -year hires and terminations will be pro -rated accordingly. The month of hire does not count towards pro -rated credit in the first year of employment. For mid -year terminations, if an employee has used more than their pro -rated amount for the year, the overpayment of PTO will be deducted from their final paycheck. Probationary Employees Probationary employees are not able to use more than forty (40) hours of time off during their first six (6) months of employment. Annual Usage Requirement Employees must use at least 50% of their annual accrual each year. Annual Contribution to the MN State Healthcare Savings Plan (HCSP) PTO balances over 320 hours as of the first payroll in December will be paid into the HCSP (maximum of 48 hours) based on the employee's current hourly rate of pay. The HCSP deposit does not count towards an employee's 50% usage requirement. Employees who use bereavement leave during the year will not be allowed to roll hours into the HCSP. Carry -Over Employees may carry over up to 320 hours of PTO each year into the next year. Any hours over 320 will be forfeited at year-end, unless due to a qualifying (unusual or non-recurring) circumstance the City Administrator approves an extension or cash payment to avoid a loss of PTO time. All qualifying circumstances must be reported to the Personnel Committee on an annual basis. Unpaid Leave Employees must normally use all earned PTO prior to taking an unpaid leave. If the leave qualifies under the Parenting Leave or Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA), the employee may retain a balance of forty (40) hours when going on an unpaid leave. Any exceptions must be approved by the City Administrator. PTO Donation Employees may transfer their PTO hours from one employee to another under the following conditions: A. Such transfers can be made only after the showing of unique or special circumstances and only upon the approval of the City Administrator. Before such transfer will be approved, the proposed recipient of the transfer must have used all of his/her PTO. B. PTO transfer shall be limited to forty (40) hours per donor. Such transfer shall be made on a dollar for dollar basis. The worth of the leave shall be adjusted to the pay level of the donor. Therefore, if the salary of the donor is greater than the recipient, one day of leave from the donor shall result in more than one full day to the recipient. Conversely, if the salary of the donor is less than the recipient, the one -day of leave from the donor shall result in less than one full day. C. Requests for such transfer of PTO must be submitted in writing, to the Human Resources Manager or designee, who shall handle all communications between recipient and donor. When a donor volunteers such transfer, he/she must first execute a release document for such transfer that will be kept on file in the Human Resource Department. D. When a transfer has been finalized in accordance with the rules and approved by the Human Resources Manager and City Administrator, the Finance Department shall take the necessary accounting action to reflect such transfer. Council Agenda: 6/26/17 3A. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2017-29 Approving Prouerty Tax Abatement Related to Infrastructure Improvements in the Citv of Monticello (WO) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: On May 22, 2017, the City Council called for a public hearing on June 26, 2017, as required by the tax abatement process to issue debt for construction of the Fallon Avenue overpass and related street improvements. The notice of public hearing was published in the Monticello Times. The following is from the Mav 22nd staff report: The city plans to issue abatement bonds to finance construction of the Fallon Avenue overpass and related street improvements. The city is issuing these bonds under the abatement statute because no other general obligation bonding mechanism is available for the project as it is proposed. As part of the process, the city has identified properties that will benefit from the project for inclusion in the abatement project area. The benefitting properties will pay property taxes in the same manner as non -benefitting properties. In that sense, the term abatement is misleading. On February 13, 2017, the city passed a resolution declaring its intent to seek reimbursement (up to $8.4 million) for project costs from bond issue proceeds. The abatement project will be combined with other improvement projects for one bond issue this Fall. Two separate bond issues will support the project, with the first issue in 2017 having a 15 year term. The second issue will have a 14 year term. No hearing will be required for additional issuances. The total combined abatement bonds to be issued over a two-year period will not exceed $9,000,000, supported by an annual abatement levy collected over a term of 15 years. Al. Budget Impact: By adopting this resolution the city would have the ability to include this project in a future bond issue. A2. Staff Workload Impact: Minimal. A3. Legal Review: The resolution was prepared by legal counsel. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to close the public hearing and approve Resolution 2017-29 — Resolution Approving Property Tax Abatement Related to Infrastructure Improvements in the City of Monticello. 2. Motion to close the public hearing and deny approval of Resolution 2017-29. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City Staff recommends Alternative #1. Council Agenda: 6/26/17 D. SUPPORTING DATA: Resolution 2017-29 CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2017-29 RESOLUTION APPROVING PROPERTY TAX ABATEMENT RELATED TO INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS IN THE CITY OF MONTICELLO BE IT RESOLVED By the City Council (the "Council") of the City of Monticello, Wright County, Minnesota (the "City"), as follows: Section 1. Recitals. 1.01. The City has contemplated granting a property tax abatement in order to help finance infrastructure improvements primarily consisting of the construction of the Fallon overpass and associated street improvements (the "Project"), which will benefit certain property in the City, all pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.1812 through 469.1815, as amended (the "Act"). 1.02. Pursuant to Section 469.1813, subdivision 1 of the Act, the City may grant an abatement of all or a portion of the taxes imposed by the City on a parcel of property to pay for all or part of the cost of acquisition or improvement of public infrastructure, whether or not located on or adjacent to the parcel for which the tax is abated. 1.03. The City has identified nine hundred sixty-eight (968) parcels located in the City, identified in EXHIBIT A hereto (the "Abatement Property"), which will be benefitted by the Project and from which the City proposes to abate a portion of the City's share of taxes to help finance the Project, subject to all the terms and conditions of this resolution. 1.04. The City intends to issue one or more series of general obligation bonds, a portion of which will be designated as tax abatement bonds in the approximate aggregate principal amount of $9,000,000 (the "Abatement Bonds") and will be issued to pay the costs of the Project pursuant to the Act and are expected to be paid primarily through the collection of Abatement revenues (as defined herein). 1.05. On the date hereof, the Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the Abatement at which the views of all interested persons were heard. Section 2. Findings. 2.01. It is hereby found and determined that the benefits to the City from the Abatement will be at least equal to the costs to the City of the Abatement, because (a) the Abatement will help finance the Project, which is necessary to provide improved transportation and safety and to prevent deterioration of road infrastructure conditions in the City; and (b) the increased City taxes collected from the Abatement Property upon termination of the Abatement are expected to far exceed the amount of the Abatement collected from the Abatement Property during the term of this resolution. 2.02. It is hereby found and determined that the Abatement is in the public interest for the reasons described in Section 2.01 hereof. 501817v2 MNI MN190-154 Section 3. Actions Ratified. Abatement Approved. 3.01. The Board hereby ratifies all actions of the City's staff and consultants in arranging for approval of this resolution in accordance with the Act. 3.02. Subject to the provisions of the Act, the Abatement is hereby approved and adopted subject to the following terms and conditions: (a) The term "Abatement" means the City's share of the real property taxes generated from the improvements on the Abatement Property, in the amounts described in this Section: (i) The aggregate Abatement paid by the City during the term of this resolution will not exceed the amount necessary to pay the principal of the Abatement Bonds, up to a maximum of $9,000,000. (ii) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, the Abatement payable on any August 1 and subsequent February 1, combined, will not exceed the amount produced by extending the City's total tax rate for the applicable year against the tax capacity of the Abatement Property, as of January 2 in the prior year. (iii) In accordance with Section 469.1813, subdivision 8 of the Act, in no year shall the Abatement, together with all other abatements approved by the City under the Act and paid in that year, exceed the greater of 10% of the City's net tax capacity for that year or $200,000 (the "Abatement Volume Cap"). The City may grant any other abatements permitted under the Act after the date of this resolution, provided that to the extent the total abatements in any year exceed the Abatement Cap, the allocation of Abatement Cap to such other abatements is subordinate to the Abatements under this Agreement. (b) The City will pay the Abatement in semiannual installments each February 1 and August 1, commencing June 1, 2018, and continuing through February 1, 2033. The City will pay the Abatement solely to finance the cost of the Project, through application of Abatement amounts toward debt service payments on the Abatement Bonds (including any bonds issued to refund the initial Abatement Bonds). (c) This resolution may be modified only with the prior written approval of the City, and any modification is subject to Section 469.1813, subdivision 7 of the Act. (d) In accordance with Section 469.1815 of the Act, the City will add to its levy in each year during the term of the Abatement the total estimated amount of current year Abatement granted under this resolution. 3.03. The Mayor and City Administrator are authorized and directed to execute and deliver any agreements, certificates or other documents that the City determines are necessary to implement this resolution. 501817v2 MM MN190-154 2 Approved by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, this 26`h day of June, 2017. Mayor Attest: City Clerk 501817v2 MNI MN190-154 EXHIBIT A ABATEMENT PROPERTY Parcel Identification Numbers: 155221001010, 155212001020, 155229001020, 155178002030, 155207001020, 155209001010, 155211001010, 155212001030, 155220001010, 155207001010, 155212001010, 155216001010, 155219000010, 155221000010, 155229001010, 155208001020, 155208001010, 155069001010, 155069001090, 155069002030, 155069002060, 155069003010, 155069003040, 155073001010, 155073002010, 155073003050, 155073003080, 155073003110, 155073003140, 155073005020, 155073005130, 155073006010, 155073006040, 155078001030, 155078002020, 155078002050, 155078002080, 155078002160, 155078003020, 155078003050, 155078003080, 155078003110, 155078003190, 155078004010, 155078004040, 155082001030, 155082001060, 155082001090, 155082002030, 155082002090, 155082002170, 155082002200, 155082003030, 155082003060, 155082003090, 155082003170, 155082004010, 155082004040, 155082004070, 155082005010, 155088001030, 155088002010, 155088002040, 155088003020, 155088003050, 155088004020, 155088005010, 155088007020, 155090001030, 155090001060, 155090002020, 155090002050, 155090002080, 155090002140, 155090003020, 155090003050, 155090003080, 155090003110, 155090003140, 155090003220, 155090004030, 155090004060, 155090005030, 155093001010, 155093001040, 155093001070, 155093001150, 155093001180, 155096001040, 155096001070, 155096001100, 155096001130, 155096001160, 155096002080, 155096002110, 155096003030, 155096003060, 155096003090, 155102001030, 155102001060, 155102001090, 155102001120, 155102002020, 155102002100, 155102003010, 155102003040, 155102003070, 155102004020, 155103001060, 155103001090, 155103002010, 155103002040, 155103003030, 155103003110, 155103003170, 155105001060, 155105001090, 155105001150, 155105003030, 155105004030, 155105004060, 155105004090, 155105004120, 155105004150, 155105005080, 155105005110, 155105005140, 155105005170, 155105005200, 155105006010, 155105006040, 155105006070, 155105007010, 155105007040, 155105008050, 155105008080, 155110001020, 155110001080, 155110001220, 155110001250, 155110001280, 155110001310, 155118001010, 155118001040, 155118001070, 155118001100, 155118002010, 155118002040, 155124001020, 155124001050, 155124001080, 155124002020, 155124003010, 155124003090, 155124003120, 155124003150, 155124003180, 155129001030, 155129001060, 155130001040, 155130001070, 155130001100, 155130001130, 155130002030, 155130002060, 155133001160, 155133001560, 155133001620, 155147002030, 155147003030, 155147005010, 155154004020, 155154006050, 155155001070, 155155004180, 155172002040, 155172003090, 155175004010, 155175005100, 155177002070, 155180002010, 155180003020, 155180004060, 155133001020, 155133001050, 155133001130, 155133001190, 155133001220, 155133001250, 155133001280, 155133001360, 155133001420, 155133001480, 155133001590, 155147001020, 155147001050, 155147002060, 155147005040, 155147006030, 155147007020, 155147008020, 155154001010, 155154001040, 155154002030, 155154003030, 155154005040, 155154005070, 155154006020, 155154007020, 155155002030, 155155003020, 155155003050, 155155003130, 155155004010, 155155004040, 155155004070, 155155004150, 155170001030, 155170001060, 155170002030, 155172002010, 155172002100, 155172003060, 155172003120, 155175001040, 155175002010, 155175002040, 155175002070, 155175003160, 155175003190, 155175004040, 155175005070, 155175005130, 155180002070, 155180002180, 155180002210, 155069001040, 155069001070, 155069002010, 155069002040, 155069002070, 155069003050, 155069003070, 155073002040, 155073003030, 155073003060, 155073003090, 155073003120, 155073005050, 155073005080, 155073005100, 155073005110, 155073005140, 155073005160, 155073005170, 155073006070, 155078001010, 155078001040, 155078002030, 155078002110, 155078002140, 155078002170, 155078003030, 155078003060, 155078003140, 155078003170, 155078003200, 155078004020, 155078004050, 155078004070, 155082001010, 155082001040, 155082001070, 155082002010, 155082002060, 155082002120, 155082002150, 155082002180, 155082003010, 155082003040, 155082003120, 155082003150, 155082003180, 155082004020, 155082004050, 155082004080, 155088001010, 155088001040, 155088002070, 155088002100, 155088003030, 155088003060, 155088004030, 155088007050, 155090001090, 155090001120, 155090002030, 155090002060, 155090002090, 155090002110, 155090002170, 155090002200, 155090003030, 155090003060, 155090003090, 155090003170, 155090003200, 155090003210, 155090004010, 155090004040, 155090005010, 155090005060, 155090005090, 155093001020, 155093001100, 155093001130, 155093001160, 155093001170, 155096001020, 155096001050, 155096001080, 155096001110, 155096002030, 155096002060, 155096002090, 155096003010, 155096003040, 155096003070, 155102001010, 155102001040, 155102001070, 155102001100, 155102002050, 155102002080, 155102002110, 155102002130, 155102002140, 155102003020, 155103001010, 155103001040, 155103001070, 155103001100, 155103002020, 501817v2 MM MN190-154 A-1 155103003060, 155103003090, 155103003120, 155103003140, 155103003150, 155103003180, 155103003200, 155105001010, 155105001040, 155105001070, 155105001100, 155105001120, 155105001130, 155105002010, 155105002030, 155105003060, 155105004010, 155105004040, 155105004070, 155105004100, 155105005030, 155105005060, 155105005090, 155105005120, 155105005150, 155105005230, 155105005260, 155105006020, 155105006050, 155105006080, 155105007070, 155105008030, 155105008040, 155105008060, 155105008090, 155110001030, 155110001050, 155110001110, 155110001140, 155110001170, 155110001190, 155110001200, 155110001230, 155110001260, 155110001340, 155118001020, 155118001050, 155118001080, 155118001110, 155118002070, 155124001010, 155124001030, 155124001060, 155124003040, 155124003070, 155124003100, 155124003110, 155124003130, 155124003160, 155129001010, 155130001020, 155130001050, 155130001080, 155130001110, 155130002010, 155133001080, 155133001110, 155133001120, 155133001140, 155133001170, 155133001200, 155133001230, 155133001310, 155133001340, 155133001350, 155133001370, 155133001390, 155133001400, 155133001430, 155133001450, 155133001510, 155133001540, 155133001570, 155133001580, 155133001600, 155133001630, 155147001030, 155147002010, 155147002040, 155147003060, 155147004010, 155147004030, 155147005020, 155147006010, 155147006040, 155147007030, 155147007050, 155147009010, 155147009020, 155147009040, 155154001020, 155154002010, 155154004050, 155154005020, 155154005050, 155154005080, 155154006030, 155155001020, 155155001050, 155155002040, 155155003080, 155155003110, 155155003140, 155155003160, 155155003170, 155155004020, 155155004100, 155155004130, 155155004160, 155170001010, 155170001040, 155170002040, 155170002060, 155172002020, 155172002050, 155172002070, 155172003010, 155172003040, 155172003070, 155172003100, 155172003130, 155175001020, 155175001050, 155175002020, 155175002050, 155175003020, 155175003050, 155175003080, 155175003110, 155175003140, 155175003170, 155175003200, 155175005020, 155175005050, 155175005080, 155175005110, 155177002020, 155177002050, 155180001050, 155180002040, 155180002050, 155180002130, 155180002160, 155180002190, 155180002220, 155180004010, 155180004090, 155069001020, 155069001030, 155069001050, 155069001060, 155069001080, 155069002020, 155069002050, 155069002080, 155069003020, 155069003030, 155069003060, 155073001020, 155073001030, 155073002020, 155073002030, 155073003010, 155073003020, 155073003040, 155073003070, 155073003100, 155073003130, 155073004010, 155073005010, 155073005030, 155073005040, 155073005060, 155073005070, 155073005090, 155073005120, 155073005150, 155073005180, 155073006020, 155073006030, 155073006050, 155073006060, 155073006080, 155073006090, 155078001020, 155078002010, 155078002040, 155078002060, 155078002070, 155078002090, 155078002100, 155078002120, 155078002130, 155078002150, 155078003010, 155078003040, 155078003070, 155078003090, 155078003100, 155078003120, 155078003130, 155078003150, 155078003160, 155078003180, 155078003210, 155078004030, 155078004060, 155078004080, 155082001020, 155082001050, 155082001080, 155082002020, 155082002040, 155082002050, 155082002070, 155082002080, 155082002100, 155082002110, 155082002130, 155082002140, 155082002160, 155082002190, 155082003020, 155082003050, 155082003070, 155082003080, 155082003100, 155082003110, 155082003130, 155082003140, 155082003160, 155082003190, 155082004030, 155082004060, 155082004090, 155082005020, 155082005030, 155088001020, 155088001050, 155088002020, 155088002030, 155088002050, 155088002060, 155088002080, 155088002090, 155088003010, 155088003040, 155088004010, 155088004040, 155088006010, 155088007010, 155088007030, 155088007040, 155090001010, 155090001020, 155090001040, 155090001050, 155090001070, 155090001080, 155090001100, 155090001110, 155090002010, 155090002040, 155090002070, 155090002100, 155090002120, 155090002130, 155090002150, 155090002160, 155090002180, 155090002190, 155090003010, 155090003040, 155090003070, 155090003100, 155090003120, 155090003130, 155090003150, 155090003160, 155090003180, 155090003190, 155090004020, 155090004050, 155090005020, 155090005040, 155090005050, 155090005070, 155090005080, 155090005100, 155090006010, 155093001030, 155093001050, 155093001060, 155093001080, 155093001090, 155093001110, 155093001120, 155093001140, 155096001010, 155096001030, 155096001060, 155096001090, 155096001120, 155096001140, 155096001150, 155096002010, 155096002020, 155096002040, 155096002050, 155096002070, 155096002100, 155096003020, 155096003050, 155096003080, 155102001020, 155102001050, 155102001080, 155102001110, 155102001130, 155102002010, 155102002030, 155102002040, 155102002060, 155102002070, 155102002090, 155102002120, 155102002150, 155102003030, 155102003050, 155102003060, 155102003080, 155102004010, 155103001020, 155103001030, 155103001050, 155103001080, 155103001110, 155103002030, 155103003010, 155103003020, 155103003040, 155103003050, 155103003070, 155103003080, 155103003100, 155103003130, 155103003160, 155103003190, 155103003210, 155105001020, 155105001030, 155105001050, 155105001080, 155105001110, 155105001140, 155105002020, 155105003010, 155105003020, 155105003040, 155105003050, 155105003070, 155105003080, 155105004020, 155105004050, 155105004080, 155105004110, 155105004130, 155105004140, 155105005010, 155105005020, 155105005040, 155105005050, 155105005070, 155105005100, 155105005130, 155105005160, 155105005180, 155105005190, 155105005210, 155105005220, 155105005240, 155105005250, 501817v2 MM MN190-154 A-2 155105005270, 155105006030, 155105006060, 155105006090, 155105007020, 155105007030, 155105007050, 155105007060, 155105008010, 155105008020, 155105008070, 155105008100, 155110001010, 155110001040, 155110001060, 155110001070, 155110001090, 155110001100, 155110001120, 155110001130, 155110001150, 155110001160, 155110001180, 155110001210, 155110001240, 155110001270, 155110001290, 155110001300, 155110001320, 155110001330, 155118001030, 155118001060, 155118001090, 155118001120, 155118002020, 155118002030, 155118002050, 155118002060, 155118002080, 155124001040, 155124001070, 155124001090, 155124002010, 155124002030, 155124002040, 155124003020, 155124003030, 155124003050, 155124003060, 155124003080, 155124003140, 155124003170, 155124003190, 155129001020, 155129001040, 155129001050, 155129001070, 155129001080, 155130001010, 155130001030, 155130001060, 155130001090, 155130001120, 155130002020, 155130002040, 155130002050, 155133001010, 155133001030, 155133001040, 155133001060, 155133001070, 155133001090, 155133001100, 155133001150, 155133001180, 155133001210, 155133001240, 155133001260, 155133001270, 155133001290, 155133001300, 155133001320, 155133001330, 155133001380, 155133001410, 155133001440, 155133001460, 155133001470, 155133001490, 155133001500, 155133001520, 155133001530, 155133001550, 155133001610, 155133001640, 155147001010, 155147001040, 155147002020, 155147002050, 155147003010, 155147003020, 155147003040, 155147003050, 155147004020, 155147004040, 155147005030, 155147006020, 155147007010, 155147007040, 155147007060, 155147008010, 155147008030, 155147008040, 155147009030, 155154001030, 155154002020, 155154003010, 155154003020, 155154003040, 155154004010, 155154004030, 155154004040, 155154004060, 155154005010, 155154005030, 155154005060, 155154006010, 155154006040, 155154007010, 155154007030, 155154007040, 155155001010, 155155001060, 155155002020, 155155003010, 155155003030, 155155003040, 155155003060, 155155003070, 155155003090, 155155003100, 155155003120, 155155003150, 155155004030, 155155004050, 155155004060, 155155004080, 155155004090, 155155004110, 155155004120, 155155004140, 155155004170, 155170001020, 155170001050, 155170002010, 155170002020, 155170002050, 155172001010, 155172002030, 155172002060, 155172002080, 155172002090, 155172002110, 155172002120, 155172003020, 155172003030, 155172003050, 155172003080, 155172003110, 155172003140, 155175001010, 155175001030, 155175001060, 155175002030, 155175002060, 155175002080, 155175003010, 155175003030, 155175003040, 155175003060, 155175003070, 155175003090, 155175003100, 155175003120, 155175003150, 155175003180, 155175003210, 155175004020, 155175004030, 155175004050, 155175005010, 155175005030, 155175005040, 155175005060, 155175005090, 155175005120, 155177001010, 155177002010, 155177002030, 155177002040, 155177002060, 155180001010, 155180001030, 155180001060, 155180002030, 155180002060, 155180002080, 155180002110, 155180002120, 155180002140, 155180002150, 155180004040, 155180004070, 155180004080, 155154006060, 155155001040, 155175003130, 155180004030, 155155002010, 155155004190, 155180001020, 155180001040, 155180002020, 155180002100, 155155001030, 155155003180, 155180002090, 155180002170, 155180002200, 155180003010, 155180004020, 155180004050,155241001020 501817v2 MM MN190-154 A-3 Council Agenda: 06/26/16 4A. Consideration of approving acceptance of the 2016 Audit Renort (WO) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: A transparent organization trusted with properly managing public dollars, the city of Monticello and all Minnesota cities are statutorily required to have a private third parry conduct an annual audit of its financial statements. For the seventh year, Malloy, Montague, Kamowski, Radosevich & Co., P.A. (MMKR) conducted the city's audit. All Finance Department personnel contributed to audit process, with the finance manager providing a substantial and critical role. The city's 2015 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) received the Government Finance Officers Association's (GFOA) Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting. This is the sixth time the city has received the award, but the second time staff prepared the report. The 2016 CAFR was prepared and submitted by staff to the GFOA for grading and comment. Finally, the CAFR format allows credit rating firms to compare the city's financial position with other cities. Such comparison could lead to a better bond rating. Jim Eichten, Principal of MMKR, will present a summary of their findings and summarize the highlights of the City's 2016 CAFR. Information presented at the workshop and council meeting will be available on-line at the city_ 's website under city_ services — finance. No extra copies will be available for distribution. Al. Budget Impact: Acceptance of the audit report results in no costs. A2. Staff Workload Impact: Prepare agenda item and post to website. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: Motion to accept the 2016 Audit Report. 2. Motion to not accept the 2016 Audit Report at this time. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff supports Alternative #1. The finance director would like to thank all city and departmental staff for their participation in the audit process, adherence to procedures/policies/statutes, and contribution to the final product. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. The 2016 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (Available online — printed copy provided at the City Council meeting) B. Special Purpose Audit Report C. Management Letter '.S' �� *till+ ,� lyT�? � �i� •��• l .�, y. ` �.� •+ � • �" CITY fifiONTIC" �NN S Comprehesive An nuaL.Firlancial Repo r - _ ... o4j ... FOR THE FISC SEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 201 -- * y OAK .+t •' ��5. t w, ,� �, ice• ; ti -�, - f � w �t `� �.+i • _ yam' �� ^• 4'l�"_- ter./'• y •l• t ar or 10 411 IwIt 46 yf '• • - � _"._• .fir A 4�=� �i'� �i `� � r. � -�� /f'' _ l� T � `. . {t-IPfw + 10 f• � `- � .:l� 'fit ra ,� �— �� City of Monticello Wright County, Minnesota COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016 Prepared by THE "FINANCE TEAM" Julie Cheney, Finance Assistant Debbie Davidson, Finance Clerk Sarah Rathlisberger, Finance Manager RaeLynn Cook, Payroll -Finance Clerk Pat Kovich, Utility Billing Specialist Wayne W. Oberg, Finance Director CITY OF MONTICELLO Comprehensive Annual Financial Report Table of Contents December 31, 2016 INTRODUCTORY SECTION Letter of Transmittal GFOA Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting Organization Chart Directory of Officials FINANCIAL SECTION Independent Auditor's Report Management's Discussion and Analysis Basic Financial Statements Government -wide Financial Statements Statement of Net Position Statement of Activities Fund Financial Statements Balance Sheet - Governmental Funds Reconciliation of the Governmental Funds Balance Sheet to the Statement of Net Position Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Governmental Funds Reconciliation of the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds to the Statement of Activities Statement of Net Position - Proprietary Funds Statement of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Net Position - Proprietary Funds Statement of Cash Flows - Proprietary Funds Notes to the Financial Statements Required Supplementary Information Schedules of Employer's Share and Non -Employer Proportionate Share of Net Pension Liability Schedules of Employer's Pension Contibutions Schedule of Changes in the Fire Relief Association's Net Pension Liability (Asset) and Related Ratios Schedule of Funding Progress Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual - General Fund Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual - Community Center Fund Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual - Economic Development Authority Fund Notes to the Required Supplementry Information Combining and Individual Fund Statements and Schedules Nonmajor Governmental Funds Combining Balance Sheet Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance (continued) Paqe 1 4 5 6 19 21 22 23 24 25 26 29 30 32 57 58 59 60 62 64 65 66 67 68 CITY OF MONTICELLO Comprehensive Annual Financial Report Table of Contents December 31, 2016 (continued) Internal Service Funds Paqe Combining Statement of Net Position 69 Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Net Position 70 Combining Statement of Cash Flows 71 Other Supplementry Schedules Schedule of Revenues (Sources) and Expenditures (Uses) - General Fund 73 Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual - Minnesota Investment Fund 77 Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual - Cemetery Fund 78 Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual - CDBG-Revitalization Fund 79 Schedule of Assets, Liabilities, and Fund Balances - Economic Development Authority 80 Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Other Financing Sources (Uses) - Economic Development Authority 82 Schedule of Assets, Liabilities, Deferred Inflows of Resources, and Fund Balances - Debt Service Activities 84 Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Other Financing Sources (Uses) - Debt Service Activities 85 STATISTICAL SECTION Financial trends Net Position by Component - Last Ten Fiscal Years 87 Changes in Net Position - Last Ten Fiscal years 88 Fund Balances of Governmental Funds - Last Ten Fiscal Years 90 Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds - Last Ten Fiscal Years 91 Governmental Funds Tax Revenues by Source - Last Ten Fiscal Years (modified accrual basis of accounting) 92 General Governmental Tax Revenues by Source - Last Ten Fiscal Years (accrual basis of accounting) 93 Revenue capacity Tax Capacity Value and Estimated Market Value of Taxable Property - Last Ten Fiscal Years 94 Property Tax Rates - All Direct and Overlapping Governments - Last Ten Fiscal Years 95 Property Tax Levies and Collections - Last Ten Fiscal Years 96 Principal Property Taxpayers - Current Year and Nine Years Ago 97 Water Sold by Customer Type (gallons) - Last Ten Fiscal Years 98 Water and Sewage Utility Rates - Last Ten Fiscal Years 99 Debt capacity Ratios of Outstanding Debt by Type - Last Ten Fiscal Years 100 Ratios of Net General Obligation Bonded Debt Outstanding - Last Ten Fiscal Years 101 Legal Debt Margin Information - Last Ten Fiscal Years 102 Computation of Direct and Overlapping Debt 103 Schedule of General Obligation Revenue Bond Coverage - Last Four Fiscal Years 104 Economic and demographic information Demographic and Economic Statistics - Last Ten Fiscal Years 105 Principal Employers - Current Year and Nine Years Ago 106 Operating information City Government Employees by Function/Program - Last Ten Fiscal Years 107 Operating Indicators by Function - Last Ten Fiscal Years 108 Capital Assets Statistics by Function - Last Ten Fiscal Years 110 II - _ -_�-_ s= �_- `- - �TRODU�T - � T 1�i1 - - = - s, Letter of Transmittal CIOr IZMontiiceflo 4awmm Finance Department June 20, 2017 To the Honorable Mayor, Members of the City Council, and the Citizens of the City of Monticello: I am pleased to present the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) of the City of Monticello, Minnesota (the city) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016. Responsibility for both the accuracy of the data and the completeness and fairness of the presentation, including all disclosures, rests with the city. To the best of our knowledge and belief, the enclosed data is accurate, in all material respects, and is reported in a manner designed to present fairly the financial position and results of operations of the various funds of the city. All disclosures necessary to enable the reader to gain an understanding of the city's financial activities have been included. Management assumes full responsibility for the completeness and reliability of the information contained in this report, based upon a comprehensive framework of internal control that it has established for this purpose. Because the cost of internal control should not exceed anticipated benefits, the objective is to provide reasonable, rather than absolute, assurance that the financial statements are free of any material misstatements. The city's financial statements have been audited by Malloy, Montague, Karnowski, Radosevich & Co., P.A. (MMKR), a firm of licensed certified public accountants. The goal of the independent audit was to provide reasonable assurance that the financial statements of the city for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 are free of material misstatements. The independent audit involved examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. The independent auditor concluded, based upon the audit, that there was a reasonable basis for rendering an CITY OF MONTICELLO unmodified opinion that the city's financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, are fairly presented in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The independent auditor's report is presented as the first component of the financial section of this report. The preparation of this CAFR is a requirement of state law. Also, the CAFR is required by the bond rating agencies before they will rate the city's bonds. The report can be used by the city council and the citizens of the city to gain a better understanding of the financial condition of the city. Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that management provide a narrative introduction, overview, and analysis to accompany the basic financial statements in the form of Management's Discussion and Analysis (MD&A). This letter of transmittal is designed to complement the MD&A and should be read in conjunction with it. The city's MD&A can be found immediately following the report of the auditors. PROFILE OF THE CITY The city is situated in a prime location on Interstate 94 between the cities of Minneapolis/St. Paul and St. Cloud. The city has experienced remarkable growth within the last 15 years in the residential, commercial, office, and retail sectors. The city is freestanding urban fringe community encompassing approximately 5,000 acres and a population of 13,299. The city is home to one of Minnesota's two nuclear power plants, both owned by Xcel Energy, Inc. (NYSE: XEL). With a small carbon footprint, the Xcel plant is also the city's largest employer and property taxpayer. Additionally, Monticello's business friendly environment provides a home for Cargill Kitchen Solutions. The privately -owned, agri-giant is the city's largest customer of water and sewage utility services. The city was founded by second -generation Americans who migrated west in the mid -1800s. Early settlers found the gently sloping banks and shallow river levels of the Mississippi River made a logical place for a river crossing. Incorporated in 1856, the city grew quickly during the early settlement years and then leveled to a population of about 1,300. It was this original settlement that became the core city and survives today as downtown Monticello. The city has 501(a) status and operates under the "Optional Plan A" form of government as defined in Minnesota Statutes. Under this plan, the government of the city is directed by a city council composed of an elected mayor and four elected council members. The city council exercises legislative authority and determines all matters of policy. The city council appoints personnel responsible for the proper administration of all affairs relating to the Letter of Transmittal city. Council members serve four-year terms, with two members elected every two years. The mayor is elected for a two-year term. The mayor and members of the city council are elected at large. The city provides a full range of services: the construction and maintenance of streets and other infrastructure; snow removal; park and cemetery maintenance; recreational and cultural activities; water, sewer, surface water, residential garbage, and recycling systems; community development, building inspection, planning, police, fire, and liquor store operations; a city -run fiber optic system and community center; and general government operations, including administration, finance/accounting, information systems, community information, and general government buildings. The city council is required to adopt a final budget by late December for the subsequent year. The budget is prepared by fund, function (e.g. public works), and department (e.g. streets and alleys). Transfers of appropriations between funds require the approval of the city council. The legal level of budgetary control is the department level in the General Fund and fund level in all other funds. Budget amendments require city council approval. FINANCIAL PLANNING AND THE LOCAL ECONOMY The city is recovering slowly from recent economic woes that have affected other communities in Wright County and throughout the state of Minnesota. The nuclear power plant provides the city with a relatively stable tax and employment base. During the economic downturn, new commercial development came to virtual standstill and today growth remains anemic. However, the city lost very few of its local businesses, although some reduced their workforce and scaled back operations. The rapid residential growth starting nearly a decade ago has slowed significantly but the city was not hit with a large number of foreclosed homes. In the past, the state of Minnesota has reduced local government aid (LGA) and the market value homestead credit (MVHC) to cities and counties as a way to balance its own budget. Since the city does not receive LGA, the city's finances are relatively insulated from the state's budget problems. In 2012, the state eliminated the MVHC and replaced it with a Market Value Exclusion program, which the city incorporated into its 2016 budget. The new program shifted more of the tax burden to nonresidential property taxpayers. The economy and housing market has also affected city revenues for building permits. The city issued 1,323 building permits in 2006 with a total valuation of $45,572,690. In 2016, the city issued 802 permits with a total valuation of $59,426,683. New residential infrastructure construction will need to occur to support the same level of residential building permits in the future. CITY OF MONTICELLO Fortunately, the city does not rely on the state as a major funding source (LGA). In addition, the city has budgeted conservatively over the years, resulting in very modest growth in the property tax levy. To assist external stakeholders, the city is exploring various ways to better represent its financial position, such as the elimination of all interfund loans/receivables in 2012. Other initiatives include consolidating funds with similar purposes, distributing unallocated expenses and aggregating similar costs for distribution as single amounts to each budget unit. Further, staff continues to refine the chart of accounts with the goal of providing better information to decision makers. MAJOR INITIATIVES The city has three major ongoing initiatives in 2016. The first ongoing initiative is the revitalization of its historic downtown. The downtown is the oldest part of the city and many buildings are in need of maintenance or demolition. In addition, the amount of traffic on State Highway 25 and County Road 75 makes both vehicle and pedestrian traffic difficult to move from one area of the downtown to another. Because of these issues, a number of the store fronts are unoccupied. To address these issues, the city completed an Embracing Downtown Monticello initiative with the goal to identify needed improvements and enhancements, which will once again make the downtown area a vibrant shopping and resident destination. The challenge moving 2 Letter of Transmittal forward will be the implementation of the plan and creating development opportunities within the downtown area for new and existing businesses. The second ongoing initiative is the joint purchase with Wright County of Bertram Chain of Lakes properties. The city and Wright County closed on the last 245 acres of this originally plan park area. This 1,258 acre site includes four pristine lakes and woodlands, which when developed will become a regional park. Wright County and the city obtained matching grants from the state to purchase much of acreage in the park. Stabilizing the operations of the city fiber optics operations is the last initiative. After a succession of general managers and settlement of the bondholder claims, the city is positioned to move forward with a leaner, less expensive telecommunications utility. INTERNAL CONTROL The management of the city is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal control designed to ensure that the assets of the city are protected from loss, theft, or misuse and that adequate accounting data is compiled to allow for the preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The city's internal controls are designed to provide reasonable, but not absolute assurance that these objectives are met. The concept of reasonable assurance recognizes that: 1) the cost of a control should not exceed the benefits likely to be derived, and 2) the valuation of cost and benefit requires estimates and judgments by management. The city's internal controls are subject to periodic evaluation by management and the Finance Department staff of the city. BUDGETING CONTROLS In addition, the city maintains budgetary controls. The objective of these budgetary controls is to assure compliance with legal provisions embodied in the annual appropriated budget approved by the city council. Activities of the General Fund are included in the annual appropriated budget. The level of budgetary control (that is, the level at which expenditures cannot legally exceed the appropriated amount) is established by department within the General Fund. The city council also adopts a five-year Capital Improvement Program as a financial planning document for its capital project and enterprise funds. As demonstrated by the statements and schedules included in the financial section of this report, the city continues to meet its responsibility for sound financial management. CITY OF MONTICELLO ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada (GFOA) awarded a Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting to the city for its CAFR for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015. This was the fifth year that the city has achieved this prestigious award. In order to be awarded a Certificate of Achievement, the city had to publish an easily readable and efficiently organized CAFR. This report must satisfy both accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and applicable legal requirements. A certificate of Achievement is valid for a period of one year only. We believe that our current CAFR continues to meet the Certificate of Achievement Program's requirements and we are submitting it to the GFOA to determine its eligibility for another certificate. The 2016 CAFR meets the highest professional standards and was prepared in a timely and cost effective manner. The preparation of this report would not have been possible without the efficient and dedicated service of the entire staff of the finance department and through the helpful guidance and assistance from our auditing firm, MMKR. I wish to express my appreciation to all members of the department who assisted and contributed to the preparation of this report. Credit also must be given to the mayor and city council for their unfailing support for maintaining the highest standards of professionalism in the management of the city's finances. Respectfully {submitted, S 0,� Wayne W. Oberg, MBA, CPA Sarah K. Rathlisberger Finance Director Finance Manager Certificate of Achievement 6� Government Finance Officers Association Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting Presented to City of Monticello Minnesota For its Comprehensive Annual Financial Report For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2015 Executive Director/CEO CITY OF MONTICELLO The Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada (GFOA) awarded a Certificate for Excellence in Financial Reporting to the City of Monticello, Minnesota for its Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015. The Certificate of Achievement is a prestigious national award recognizing conformance with the highest standards for preparation of state and local government reports. In order to be awarded a Certificate of Achievement, a governmental unit must publish an easily readable and efficiently organized Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, whose contents conform to program standards. Such reports must satisfy both generally accepted accounting principles and applicable legal requirements. A Certificate of Achievement is valid for a period of one year only. We believe our current report continues to conform to Certificate of Achievement program requirements, and we are submitting it to the GFOA. 4 Organization Chart Citizens of Monticello 1 City HCommissions Council &Boards 1 City lAdministratorl Human Finance Community City Public Resource - Director - Development - Engineer - Works Director Director Director Finance Economic Construction Streets - Department - Development - Inspectors - Department Data Building Consulting Parks - Processing - Inspections - Engineer - Department Audit Receptionist Utilities - - - Department Department Consulting Refuse - of Motor - Planner - Collection Vehicles Liquor - Operations Community Deputy Center City Director Clerk Community Elections Center CITY OF MONTICELLO Fire Contracted Chief - Services Fire City Department - Attorney Sheriffs - Department Animal - Control County Assessor FiberNet Operation Directory of Officials MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL CITY STAFF Position Name Term Expires Mayor..................................................................................... Brian Stumpf 12/31/2018 Council.................................................................................. Glen Posusta 12/31/2016 Council................................................................................... Tom Perrault 12/31/2016 Council.................................................................................... Lloyd Hilgart 12/31/2018 Council..............................................................................Charlotte Gabler 12/31/2018 City Administrator .......................... Finance Director ............................ Community Development Director Public Works Director ................... Economic Development Director.. City Clerk ....................................... Human Resource Manager........... Liquor Store Manager ................... DMV Manager ............................... Finance Manager .......................... Utility Superintendent .................... Street Superintendent ................... Parks Superintendent ................... Community Center Director .......... Chief Building Official .................... Fire Chief ....................................... Communications Coordinator ....... PROFESSIONAL SERVICES City Attorney........ City Engineer....... Law Enforcement Financial Advisor. ...............Jeff O'Neill .......... Wayne Oberg ...Angela Schumann ..........Wayne Oberg ...............Jeff O'Neill ...Jennifer Schreiber ........... Tracy Ergen ..... Randall Johnsen ..... Carolyn Granger Sarah Rathlisberger .......... Matt Theisen ............Tom Moores ............ Tom Pawelk ............ Ann Mosack ...............John Rued ..............Daryl Gilles .......Rachel Leonard ..........Campbell Knutson, P.A. .................. WSB & Associates Wright County Sherriff's Office ........Northland Securities, Inc. CITY OF MONTICELLO 0 `�` _ - - -- _.�7E _`_�� - _71�_.P-' •.mow-_� - - - L 77 -vy1 - + ��_ _��-'' �►1 ' � -�_' �` - � _ - � - r - - moi' - �� . _ _ � _ ' -J; Y;-� STI air— _ a� CERTI FIEI ACCOUN INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT To the City Council and Management City of Monticello, Minnesota REPORT ON THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS We have audited the accompanying financial statements of the governmental activities, the business -type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City of Monticello, Minnesota (the City) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016, and the related notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the City's basic financial statements as listed in the table of contents. MANAGEMENT'S RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America; this includes the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. AUDITOR'S RESPONSIBILITY Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable Princivals Thomas A. Karnowski, CPA Paul A. Radosevich, CPA William J. Lauer, CPA James H. Eichten, CPA Aaron J. Nielsen, CPA Victoria L. Holinka, CPA assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement. An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor's judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the City's preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the City's internal control. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinions. OPINIONS In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the respective financial position of the governmental activities, the business -type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City as of December 31, 2016, and the (continued) Malloy, Montague, Karnowski, Radosevich, & Co., P.A. 7 5353 Wayxaca Boulevard • Suire 410 • Minneapolis, MN 55416 • Telephone: 952-545-0424 • TeleFax: 952-545-0569 • www.mmkr.com respective changes in financial position and, where applicable, cash flows thereof, for the year then ended, in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. OTHER MATTERS Required Supplementary Information Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that the management's discussion and analysis and the required supplementary information (RSI), as listed in the table of contents, be presented to supplement the basic financial statements. Such information, although not a part of the basic financial statements, is required by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board, who considers it to be an essential part of financial reporting for placing the basic financial statements in an appropriate operational, economic, or historical context. We have applied certain limited procedures to the RSI in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, which consisted of inquiries of management about the methods ofpreparing the information and comparing the information for consistency with management's responses to our inquiries, the basic financial statements, and other knowledge we obtained during our audit of the basic financial statements. We do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on the information because the limited procedures do not provide us with sufficient evidence to express an opinion or provide any assurance. Other Information Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming opinions on the financial statements that collectively comprise the City's basic financial statements. The introductory section, combining and individual fund financial statements and schedules, and statistical section, as listed in the table of contents, are presented for purposes of additional analysis and are not required parts of the basic financial statements. The combining and individual fund statements and schedules are the responsibility of management and were derived from and relate directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and certain additional procedures, including comparing and reconciling such information directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the basic financial statements or to the basic financial statements themselves, and other additional procedures in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. In our opinion, the information is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the basic financial statements as a whole. The introductory and statistical sections have not been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, accordingly, we do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on them. OTHER REPORTING REQUIRED BY GOVERNMENTAUDITING ,STANDARDS In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated June 20, 2017 on our consideration of the City's internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, grant agreements, and other matters. The purpose of that report is to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over financial reporting and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on internal control over financial reporting or on compliance. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards in considering the City's internal control over financial reporting and compliance. Minneapolis, Minnesota June 20, 2017 12 -;1r-:_ — ,''+�--`' _ � l '�r'`s�->>►' -w '_tom 47'r � � ,�` `'-?. ts- r -- -� Ira dlp -- E�NT�I`SC= AND I11i LYSISmr- T Management's Discussion and Analysis Management's Discussion and Analysis As management of the City of Monticello, Minnesota (the city), we offer readers of the city's financial statements this narrative overview and analysis of the financial activities of the city for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016. We encourage readers to consider the information presented here in conjunction with additional information that we have furnished in our letter of transmittal, which can be found on pages 1-3 of this report. Overview of the Basic Financial Statements The discussion and analysis are intended to serve as an introduction to the city's basic financial statements. The city's basic financial statements comprise three components: 1) government -wide financial statements, 2) fund financial statements, and 3) notes to the financial statements. This report also contains other supplementary information in addition to the basic financial statements themselves. COMPONENTS OF THE ANNUAL FINANICAL REPORT ----------------- n Management's Basic Required Discussion and Financial Supplementary Analysis Statements Information ------------------� Government -wide Fund I Notes to the Financial Financial Statements Financial Statements Statements Summary q Detail Government -Wide Financial Statements — The government -wide financial statements are designed to provide readers with a broad overview of the city's finances, in a manner similar to private sector businesses. CITY OF MONTICELLO The Statement of Net Position presents information on all of the city's assets and deferred outflows of resources, and liabilities and deferred inflows of resources, with the difference between them reported as net position. Overtime, increases or decreases in net position may serve as a useful indicator of whether the financial position of the city is improving or deteriorating. The Statement of Activities presents information showing how the city's net position changed during the most recent fiscal year. All changes in net position are reported as soon as the underlying event giving rise to the change occurs, regardless of the timing of related cash flows. Thus, revenues and expenses are reported in this statement for some items that will only result in cash flows in future fiscal periods (delinquent taxes and special assessments). Both of the government -wide financial statements distinguish functions of the city that are principally supported by taxes and intergovernmental revenue (governmental activities) from other functions that are intended to recover all or a significant portion of their costs through user fees and charges (business -type activities). The governmental activities provided by the city include general government, public safety, public works, sanitation, transit, recreation and culture, and economic development. Business -type activities include water, sewage, liquor, fiber optics, and deputy registrar activities. The government -wide financial statements include not only the city itself (known as the primary government), but also the Economic Development Authority (EDA). The EDA is a legally separate entity which functions, in essence, as a department of the city, to provide redevelopment assistance through the administration of various programs. Therefore, the EDA has been included as an integral part of the city's financial statements. The government -wide financial statements can be found on pages 19-21 of this report. Fund Financial Statements — A fund is a grouping of related accounts that is used to maintain control over resources that have been segregated for specific activities or objectives. The city, like other state and local governments, uses fund accounting to ensure and demonstrate compliance with finance -related legal requirements. All of the funds of the city can be divided into two categories: governmental funds and proprietary funds. Governmental Funds — Governmental funds are used to account for essentially the same functions reported as governmental activities in the government -wide financial statements. However, unlike the government -wide financial statements, governmental fund financial statements focus on near- term inflows and outflows of spendable resources, as well as the balances of 0 Management's Discussion and Analysis spendable resources available at the end of the fiscal year. Such information may be useful in evaluating a government's near-term financing requirements. Because the focus of governmental funds is narrower than that of the government -wide financial statements, it is useful to compare the information presented for governmental funds with similar information presented for governmental activities in the government -wide financial statements. By doing so, readers may better understand the long-term impact of the government's near-term financing decisions. Both the governmental funds Balance Sheet and Statement of Revenue, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances provide a reconciliation to facilitate the comparison between governmental funds and governmental activities. The city maintains several individual governmental funds. Information is presented separately in the governmental funds Balance Sheet and in the governmental funds Statement of Revenue, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances for the General Fund, Community Center Special Revenue Fund, EDA Special Revenue Fund, Debt Service Fund, and Capital Projects Fund, all of which are considered to be major funds. Data from the remaining governmental funds are combined into a single, aggregated presentation. Individual fund data for each of these nonmajor governmental funds is provided in the form of combining statements elsewhere in this report. The city adopts an annual budget for its General Fund and major special revenue funds. A budgetary comparison schedule has been provided within the required supplementary information for the General Fund and major special revenue funds to demonstrate compliance with the adopted budgets. The governmental fund financial statements can be found on pages 22-25 of this report. Proprietary Funds — The city maintains two different types of proprietary funds. Enterprise funds are used to report the same functions presented as business - type activities in the government -wide financial statements. The city maintains five enterprise funds which are considered proprietary funds. Enterprise funds are used to report the same functions presented as business -type activities in the government -wide financial statements. The city uses enterprise funds to account for its water and sewage service operations, liquor sales operation, fiber optics, and deputy registrar operations. Internal service funds are an accounting device used to accumulate and allocate costs internally among the city's various functions. The city uses internal service funds to account for benefits accruals, information technology (IT) services, and central equipment services. Because these internal service fund activities predominantly benefit governmental rather than business -type functions, they have been included within governmental activities in the government -wide financial statements. CITY OF MONTICELLO Proprietary funds provide the same type of information as the government -wide financial statements, only in more detail. The proprietary fund financial statements provide separate information for each of the enterprise operations. The internal service funds are combined into a single, aggregated presentation in the proprietary fund financial statements. Individual fund data for the internal service funds is provided in the form of combining statements elsewhere in this report. The proprietary fund financial statements can be found on pages 26-31 of this report. Notes to Basic Financial Statements — The notes to basic financial statements provide additional information that is essential to obtaining a full understanding of the data provided in the government -wide and fund financial statements. The notes to the basic financial statements can be found on pages 32-55 of this report. Other Information — In addition to the basic financial statements and accompanying notes, this report presents required supplementary information on activity related to the defined benefit pension plans and the other post - employment benefits (OPEB) plan as well as budgetary comparison information. Combining statements for nonmajor governmental funds, internal service funds, and other supplementary schedules including activities of the General, nonmajor Special Revenue, Economic Development Authority, and Debt Service funds, can also be found in the combining individual fund statements section of this report. Required supplementary information and combining individual fund statements can be found starting on page 57. 10 Management's Discussion and Analysis Financial Highlights The assets and deferred outflows of resources of the city exceeded its liabilities and deferred inflows of resources at year-end by $122,538,258 (net position). Of this amount, $29,876,760 (unrestricted net position) may be used to meet the city's ongoing obligations to citizens and creditors. As of the close of the current fiscal year, the city's governmental funds reported combined ending fund balances of $30,275,002, an increase of $1,298,752, or 4.5 percent. Nonspendable, restricted, and assigned uses of fund balance totaled $24,132,527, leaving an unassigned fund balance of $6,142,475. The 2016 year-end unassigned fund balance is $1,268,981 or 26 percent, higher than the 2015 ending balance. At the end of the current fiscal year, unassigned fund balance for the General Fund was $6,142,475, or 87.8 percent, of total General Fund expenditures for 2016. The city targets 45 percent of next year's expenditure budget as the optimum fund balance level, providing a reserve for cash flow during the first six months of each subsequent year until property tax receipts are released from the county treasurer's office and distributed to the local levels of government. The state auditor recommends that local governments maintain an unrestricted fund balance of approximately 35-50 percent of operating revenues or no less than five months of operating expenditures for the General Fund. The General Fund's heavy dependence on property tax revenues validates the 45 percent target. (Source: Minnesota Office of the State Auditor: Fund Balance Reporting and Governmental Fund Type Definitions, based on Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement No. 54, 2010-1003 Revised July 2012). In 2016, government -wide capital assets increased by $3,271,997 due to disposals and depreciation on existing assets lagged acquisitions. All governmental activities land acquisitions occurred at Bertram Chain of Lakes park. The $1,017,795 increase included the portion of land the city is responsible for maintaining and excluded the portion Wright County is responsible for maintaining. Wright County is a 50/50 partner and will maintain the lakes and trails section of the park. The city will maintain the athletic facilities section. Other acquisitions include improvements at the intersection of TH25 CITY OF MONTICELLO and County Hwy 75 as well as the 2016 Street Reconstruction project and a retaining wall along Hillside Cemetery on 7th Street to prepare for intersection improvements at TH25 and 7th Street to be completed in 2017. Internal service funds acquisitions include two new vehicles, a pavement cutter, and a 10 -foot mower. The city's total long-term bonded indebtedness decreased by $54,418, or 0.2 percent, in 2016. Principal payments made on outstanding debt totaled $6,367,483. The city issued $4,900,000 in general obligations bonds to finance capital project costs and $1,413,065 of PFA loan for wastewater treatment plant improvements in 2016. The 2016A general obligation bonds are accounted for in the Debt Service Fund and will be paid from special assessments and property taxes. The PFA loan is accounted for in the Sewage Fund and utility customer charges will generate the cash needed for repayment of this debt. 11 Management's Discussion and Analysis GOVERNMENT -WIDE FINANCIAL ANALYSIS Current and other assets Capital assets Total assets Deferred outflows of resources Long-term liabilities Other liabilities Total liabilities Deferred inflows of resources Net position Net investment in capital assets Restricted Unrestricted Total net position NET POSITION Governmental Activities Business -Type Activities 2016 2015 2016 2015 $ 37, 757,171 60, 637, 933 98, 395,104 1,522,334 24,958,930 1,723,032 26,681,962 763,930 41,077,683 10, 569, 693 20, 824,170 $ 36,074,680 58, 497, 221 94,571,901 270,113 24,186, 732 1,399,698 25, 586, 430 378,179 38, 099, 568 12,633,770 18,144, 067 $ 10, 607, 848 45, 429, 326 56, 037,174 524,942 5,748,887 543,065 6,291,952 203,452 41,014,122 9,052,590 $ 9,984,124 44,298,041 54, 282,165 129,955 4,762,207 541,740 5,303,947 222,104 40, 722, 087 8,163, 982 CITY OF MONTICELLO Total 2016 2015 $ 48, 365, 019 $ 46, 058, 804 106, 067, 259 102, 795, 262 154,432, 278 148, 854, 066 2,047,276 30, 707, 817 2,266,097 32,973,914 967,382 82,091,805 10, 569, 693 29, 876, 760 28, 948, 939 1,941,438 30, 890, 377 600,283 78,821,655 12, 633, 770 26, 308, 049 $ 72, 471, 546 $ 68, 877, 405 $ 50, 066, 712 $ 48, 886, 069 $ 122, 538, 258 $ 117, 763, 474 By the far the largest portion of the city's net position (67%) reflects investment in capital assets (e.g. land, buildings, structures, systems, machinery, equipment, infrastructure, and intangible assets), net of any related debt used to acquire those assets that is still outstanding. The city uses assets to provide services to citizens; consequently, these assets are not available for future spending. Although the city's investment in capital assets is reported net of related debt, it should be noted that resources needed to repay this debt must be provided from other sources, since capital assets themselves cannot be used to liquidate these liabilities. A small portion of the city's net position (9%) represents resources that are subject to external restrictions on how they can be used. The remaining unrestricted net position of $29,876,760 may be used to meet the ongoing obligations to citizens and creditors. Of the unrestricted net position, $9,052,590 (30%) is attributable to business -type activities. The unrestricted governmental activities net position increased $2,680,103 (15%), while business -type activities unrestricted net position increased $888,608 (11 %). The government -wide total unrestricted net position increased $3,568,711 (14%), reflecting revenues exceeding conservative budgeted estimates. The $2,140,712 (4%) increase in governmental activities capital assets is reflective of capital asset purchases and reinvestment exceeding depreciation and disposals. Business -type capital assets increased $1,131,285 (3%) also due to reinvestment exceeding depreciation. Net investment in capital assets, which is capital assets less related debt, increased with Bertram Chain of Lakes land acquisitions and improvements at the wastewater treatment plant. The land was not acquired with debt. A grant along with debt financed the treatment plant improvements. 12 Management's Discussion and Analysis Revenues Program revenues Charges for services Operating grants and contributions Capital grants and contributions General revenues Property taxes Tax increments Franchise taxes Unrestricted investment earnings Gain on sale of assets Total revenues Expenses General government Public safety Public works Sanitation Transit Recreation and culture Economic development Interest and fiscal charges Water utility Sewage utility Liquor Fiber optics Deputy registrar Total expenses Increase in net position before transfers and special items Transfers Special item: contribution of land to county Special item: transfer of operations Change in net position Net position, January 1 Net position, December 31 CITY OF MONTICELLO CHANGE IN NET POSITION Governmental Activities Business -Type Activities Total 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 $ 3,524,892 $ 2,663,578 $ 7,107,373 $ 6,912,512 $ 10,632,265 $ 9,576,090 389,005 355,041 - - 389,005 355,041 3,297,265 2,667,710 2,000,456 1,454,980 5,297,721 4,122,690 9,270,592 8,683,585 - - 9,270,592 8,683,585 668,352 727,617 - 668,352 727,617 412,217 333,484 - - 412,217 333,484 375,614 278,465 128,080 108,191 503,694 386,656 11,180 30,473 5,218 88,157 16,398 118,630 17,949,117 15,739,953 9,241,127 8,563,840 27,190,244 24,303,793 1,694,111 1,447,725 - - 1,694,111 1,447,725 2,187, 363 1,960,009 - 2,187, 363 1,960,009 5,480,074 5,312,612 - 5,480,074 5,312,612 600,300 563,477 - 600,300 563,477 41,250 40,000 - 41,250 40,000 3,998,945 3,524,979 - 3,998,945 3,524,979 756,620 1,547,875 - 756,620 1,547,875 565,774 735,753 - - 565,774 735,753 - - 1,168,473 1,102,610 1,168,473 1,102,610 - 2,618,887 2,661,990 2,618,887 2,661,990 - 831,809 798,631 831,809 798,631 - 2,483,262 2,536,461 2,483,262 2,536,461 - - 345,492 313,968 345,492 313,968 15,324,437 15,132,430 7,447,923 7,413,660 22,772,360 22,546,090 2,624,680 607,523 1,793,204 1,150,180 4,417,884 1,757,703 969,461 2,301,045 (969,461) (2,301,045) - - - (5,511,547) - - (5,511,547) - 356,900 356,900 3,594,141 (2,602,979) 1,180,643 (1,150,865) 4,774,784 (3,753,844) 68,877,405 71,480,384 48,886,069 50,036,934 117,763,474 121,517,318 $ 72,471,546 $ 68,877,405 $ 50,066,712 $ 48,886,069 $ 122,538,258 $ 117,763,474 13 Management's Discussion and Analysis Property 52° Revenues by Source - Governmental Activities Investment Charges for earnings services 2% 20 rl--ri.,7 grants & rutions 4% rrancnise taxes 2% Program Expenses and Revenues - Governmental Activities $6 $5 $4 $3 c $2 0 r1 Cie Q -e Goo c�ece ■ Program Expenses ■ Program Revenues I grants & 'ibutions 18% CITY OF MONTICELLO Governmental Activities. The most significant revenue source for governmental activities is property taxes at 52% of total revenues. Property taxes support the General Fund, Community Center Fund, Capital Project Fund, and Debt Service Fund. Charges for services accounts for 20% of revenues, most of which is generated by the Community Center. Capital grants and contributions include special assessments and revenues from other sources restricted to capital asset acquisition. Investment earnings include both interest received and the increase (decrease) in the investment fair values. Tax increments are property taxes collected in tax increment financing districts and are restricted for development purposes. Public works (engineering, streets, ice and snow removal, shop and garage, street lighting, etc.) expenses are the most significant (36%), followed by recreation and culture (26%), public safety (14%), general government (11 %), economic development (5%), sanitation (4%), and others (4%). Included in these amounts is depreciation expense, which is 27% of the total expenses for governmental activities. Governmental activities revenues increased $2,209,164 (14%) in the current year, with the most significant portions of the increase attributable to charges for services and capital grants & contributions. In 2016, the negative change in investment fair values decreased the interest earnings by 2%. Governmental activities investment earnings for 2016 totaled $375,614. Property taxes increased by 6.8 percent, bolstered by the addition of new HRA levy of $280,000. Capital grants and contributions were affected by new assessments and federal/state aid for road construction. Governmental activities expenses increased $192,007 (1 %) in the current year. The most significant changes in program expenses were as follows: • Recreation and culture increased $473,966 (13%) with larger operational and development planning expenditures and recognition of additional employee pension benefits. • Recognition of additional pension benefits had major impacts on public safety (+12% or $227,354), public works (+3% or $167,462), and general government (+17% or $246,386) • Economic development expenses decreased $791,255 (51%) with a much smaller downward value adjustment of land held for resale and less activity in the tax increment financing districts. • Interest and fiscal charges declined 23% with amortization and redemption of higher interest debt and the addition of lower interest debt. 14 Management's Discussion and Analysis Capital grants & Revenues by Source - Business -Type Activities Investment earnings $4.5 $4.0 $3.5 $3.0 $2.5 $2.0 $1.5 $1.0 $0.5 Charges for services 77% Program Revenues and Expenses - Business -Type Activities Water Utility Sewage Utility Liquor ■ Revenues ■ Expenses Fiber Optics Deputy Registrar CITY OF MONTICELLO Business -type Activities. Business -type activities increased the city's net position by $1,180,643, which is $2,331,508 more than the prior fiscal year decrease of $1,150,865. Key elements of the change are as follows: A grant (capital contribution) for wastewater treatment plant improvements and lower transfers to the Debt Service Fund are primarily responsible for the increase in net position. The enterprise funds started supporting debt service when water and sewage impact fees declined. Business -type activities investment earnings for 2016 totaled $128,080. This is a $19,889 increase over the prior year's investment earnings of $108,191. Swings in investment fair values did not have a significant impact on net investment earnings in 2016. Capital grants and contributions for water and sewer trunk charges are now accounted for in each respective enterprise fund. The city also recorded capital contributions from a MPFA grant. Capital contributions for 2016 totaled $2,000,456, an increase of $545,476 (37%) over the prior year. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS OF THE CITY'S FUNDS Governmental funds. The focus of the city's governmental funds is to provide information on near-term inflows, outflows, and balances of spendable resources. Such information is useful in assessing the city's financing requirements. In particular, spendable fund balances may serve as a useful measure of a government's net resources available for expenditure at the end of the fiscal year. At December 31, 2016, the city's governmental funds reported total ending fund balances of $30,275,002, an increase of $1,298,752 (4%) when compared with the prior year. Nearly 23% or $6,987,234 of the total ending fund balances constituted restricted fund balances, which are considered unavailable for appropriation for general operations. The $3,824,575 nonspendable fund balance accounted for 13% of total governmental fund balances and is comprised of land held for resale and prepaid items. At the end of the fiscal year, the General Fund reported a fund balance of $6,276,720, increasing $1,289,924 (26%) from the prior year. General fund revenues were $633,910 (8%) more than the prior fiscal year and expenditures increased by $277,443 (4%). Transfers out decreased by $297,012 to zero. 15 Management's Discussion and Analysis General government expenditures increased $24,434 (2%) with most of the increase related to employee costs. Streets & alleys and public works inspections were largely responsible for the $93,821 (5%) increase in public works expenditures. Recreation and culture expenditures increased by $57,324 (6%) primarily caused by additional internal service fund equipment leasing and rises in employee costs. Public safety expenditures increased $63,729 (3%) with inflation to the Wright County law enforcement contract and increased activity in building inspection. The fund balance in the Community Center Fund increased $132,387 (21 %) to $761,829. Charges for services decreased $5,451 (less than 1 %) to $1,395,573 in 2016. Expenditures increased $76,802 (5%) to $1,654,445. The community center debt was fully amortized at the end of 2015. The fund balance in Economic Development Authority (EDA) Fund increased $579,465 (9%) to $7,142,330. The assigned fund balance, which is available for general EDA activity, equaled $2,835,268 at year end. Land held for resale declined $489,000 (18%) to $2,193,957. Land held for resale receives the same accounting treatment, lower of cost or fair value, as inventory. The EDA recorded a $288,402 gain on the 2016 sale of one parcel with a book value of $418,900. The EDA received $279,422 in property tax revenue in 2016. At year end, the restricted $2,274,667 portion of the fund balance is attributable to tax increment districts and loan programs. The fund balance in the Debt Service Fund decreased $1,838,663 (34%) to $3,543,551. This planned fund balance decrease reflects prior year accumulation of resources to make the February debt service payment, which in one case is the last large payment due on an issue. Additionally, the city redeemed early a total of $1,061,000 in debt principal on two issues. Special assessment revenue decreased $1,420,856 (64%) to $812,547. One property owner's payment of future assessments contributed significantly to the 2015 total. In governmental funds, assessments are recorded as a revenue when collectible, whether it is in the current period or soon thereafter. The Capital Projects Fund provides the accounting for acquisition of general government capital assets. Accordingly, the fund accumulates resources from various sources and expenditures may or may not occur in the same year of accumulation. Consequently, the fund balance in the Capital Projects Fund increased $1,492,016 (28%) to $6,884,229. The $1,631,789 nonspendable portion of the fund balance is land held for resale. Proceeds from a 2016 $4,900,000 general obligation bond issue are accounted for in this fund. Various assessment and street reconstruction projects were financed by this issue. The $753,500 transfer to the Park and Pathway Dedication Fund went toward Bertram land acquisition or will finance various 2017 park projects. CITY OF MONTICELLO Proprietary funds. The proprietary funds provide the same type of information found in the government -wide financial statements, but in more detail. Water Fund expenses increased $67,006 (6%) with higher personal services costs. Utility employee personal service costs are divided between the Water Fund and Sewage Fund based on activity. The Water Fund transferred $199,327 to Debt Service Fund for improvements related to the water system. The fund's net position increased $61,726 (less than 1%) to $14,390,486. Depreciation expense for the fund totaled $502,447. Sewage Fund expenses decreased $28,244 (1%). The Sewage Fund transferred out $770,134 to the Debt Service Fund for improvements related to the sewage system. The 2016 capital contributions of $1,812,602 included a $726,157 grant for wastewater treatment plant improvements. The fund's net position increased $675,582 (3%) to $20,489,128. Depreciation expense for the fund totaled $1,142,479. The Liquor Fund's net position increased $236,021 (26%) to $1,141,827. The fund's sales decreased $40,846 (1 %) to $5,448,584. A road construction project contributed to the decline. Gross profit decreased $112,483 (7%) to $1,407,360. The Liquor Fund transferred $350,000 to the Fiber Optics Fund in 2016. Operating expenses increased $34,503 (4%) to $836,048 in 2016. Depreciation expense for the fund totaled $40,512. The Fiber Optics Fund's net position decreased $38,671 to $13,361,470. The fund's 2016 sales increased $28,536 (2%) to $1,692,935. Excluding depreciation, the operating loss decreased from $367,607 to $331,799 in 2016. Depreciation for the fund totaled $419,555. The city contracted for FiberNet management an operations starting July 1, 2016. The Deputy Registrar Fund (DMV) net position increased $220,047 (54%) to $629,881. Charges for services increased $30,367 (6%) to $561,775 and operating expenses increased $33,431 (9%) to $352,117. Depreciation for the fund totaled $3,185. In 2016, the DMV processed 75,891 transactions, a 5% increase over the prior year. Other factors of the changes in income from operations have previously been discussed in the government -wide financial analysis of business -type activities. 16 Management's Discussion and Analysis GENERAL FUND BUDGETARY HIGHLIGHTS General Fund revenues and other financing sources totaled $8,282,736 and exceeded budget by 686,736 (9%). Licenses and permits and other revenues were $329,702 (97%) and $178,824 (210%) higher than budget, respectively. Licenses and permits were impacted by the increase in building permits. Other revenues include an insurance dividend, which varies from year-to-year and is never budgeted. General Fund expenditures totaled $6,992,812 and were $603,188 (8%) less than budget. With position vacancies, low fuel costs, and mild winter, public works was $443,118 (20%) less than budget. One function exceeded budget (transit). Within the functions, eight of thirty-five reporting units exceeded budget. CAPITAL ASSETS AND DEBT ADMINISTRATION CITY OF MONTICELLO The General Fund year end fund balances since 2011 are as follows: CAPITAL ASSETS Year Amount 2011 $ 4,410,637 2012 3,478,507 2013 3,914,563 2014 4,331,058 2015 4,986,796 2016 6,276,720 Net total $ 60, 637, 933 $ 58, 497, 221 Capital assets. The city's investment in capital assets for its governmental and business -type activities at December 31, 2016 totaled $106,067,259 (net of accumulated depreciation). This investment in capital assets included land, construction in progress, structures, systems, machinery and equipment, intangible assets, and infrastructure. $ 45, 429, 326 $ 44, 298, 041 $ 106, 067, 259 $ 102, 795, 262 Central Equipment Fund of $138,236. Business -type capital assets acquisitions included wastewater treatment plant improvements—two digester covers and building and equipment for phosphorous reduction. The total increase from the prior fiscal year is approximately 3%; governmental activities increased nearly 4% and business -type activities increased 3%. Major governmental activities capital assets changes: a $1,017,795 acquisition of Additional information on the city's capital assets can be found in the notes to the Bertram Chain of Lakes park land; purchase of equipment in the internal service financial statements on pages 42-43. 17 Governmental Activities Business -Type Activities Total 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 Land $ 9,573,164 $ 8,555,369 $ 1,197, 945 $ 1,197, 945 $ 10, 771,109 $ 9,753,314 Construction in progress 3,276,184 1,264,456 3,683,078 1,491,882 6,959,262 2,756,338 Buildings and systems 95,713,651 92,636,026 80,099,747 79,100,343 175,813,398 171,736,369 Machinery and equipment 5,518,993 5,425,323 2,480,276 2,543,832 7,999,269 7,969,155 Less: Accumulated depreciation (53,444,059) (49,383,953) (42,031,720) (40,035,961) (95,475,779) (89,419,914) Net total $ 60, 637, 933 $ 58, 497, 221 Capital assets. The city's investment in capital assets for its governmental and business -type activities at December 31, 2016 totaled $106,067,259 (net of accumulated depreciation). This investment in capital assets included land, construction in progress, structures, systems, machinery and equipment, intangible assets, and infrastructure. $ 45, 429, 326 $ 44, 298, 041 $ 106, 067, 259 $ 102, 795, 262 Central Equipment Fund of $138,236. Business -type capital assets acquisitions included wastewater treatment plant improvements—two digester covers and building and equipment for phosphorous reduction. The total increase from the prior fiscal year is approximately 3%; governmental activities increased nearly 4% and business -type activities increased 3%. Major governmental activities capital assets changes: a $1,017,795 acquisition of Additional information on the city's capital assets can be found in the notes to the Bertram Chain of Lakes park land; purchase of equipment in the internal service financial statements on pages 42-43. 17 Management's Discussion and Analysis OUTSTANDING INDEBTEDNESS Governmental Business -Type Activities Activities 2016 2015 2016 2015 CITY OF MONTICELLO Total 2016 2015 General obligation bonds $ 7,686,000 $ 9,563,000 $ 2,460,000 $ 2,930,347 $ 10,146,000 $ 12,493,347 Certificate of indebtedness 265,000 325,000 - - 265,000 325,000 Special assessment bonds 12,730,000 11,689,653 - - 12,730,000 11,689,653 Public facilities authority loan - - 1,927,850 615,268 1,927,850 615,268 Total $ 20,681,000 $ 21,577,653 $ 4,387,850 $ 3,545,615 $ 25,068,850 $ 25,123,268 Long-term Debt. The city's outstanding long-term debt --including general obligation bonds, special assessment bonds, revenue bonds and certificates of indebtedness—totaled $25,068,850 at December 31, 2016. Business -type long-term debt increased with the addition of debt (public facilities authority loan) related to the wastewater plant improvements. Meanwhile, the city issued $4,900,000 in general obligation bonds to finance 2016 and 2017 street projects. In 2016, the city redeemed $1,266,000 in bonds due in 2017 and 2018. All other changes are the result of normal amortization. Additional information on the city's long-term liabilities can be found in the notes to the financial statements on pages 43-46 of this report. ECONOMIC FACTORS AND NEXT YEAR'S BUDGETS AND RATES • The unemployment rate for the Wright County, Minnesota area for December 31, 2016 was 4.3%, which is above the state average (4.1%) and below the national average (4.5%). • The state and local economy are improving. New commercial and residential development grew at a sustainable pace in 2016. • The occupancy rate of the city's business district has remained constant over the last three years and new commercial construction is growing. • Inflationary trends in the region compare favorably to national indices and housing prices have risen the last two years. • The prospects for continued residential and commercial growth in 2017 look promising. REQUESTS FOR INFORMATION This financial report is designed to provide a general overview of the city's finances for all those interested in governmental finance. Questions concerning any information in the report or requests for additional information should be addressed to City of Monticello, Finance Department, 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1, Monticello, MN 55362. i�eflo Mon 18 AMID- - EIIIENTs 411111 CITY OF MONTICELLO Statement of Net Position December 31, 2016 The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement. 19 Governmental Business -type Activities Activities Total ASSETS Cash and investments $ 28,924,233 $ 8,789,589 $ 37,713,822 Receivables Unremitted taxes 31,401 - 31,401 Deliquent taxes 62,473 - 62,473 Unremitted special assessments 10,307 162 10,469 Deliquent special assessments 146,904 14,960 161,864 Deferred special assessments 4,035,675 188,465 4,224,140 Accrued interest 129,564 - 129,564 Accounts, net uncollectibles allowance 74,511 938,279 1,012,790 Due from other governmental units 268,289 81,277 349,566 Internal balances (53,920) 53,920 - Inventory - 480,648 480,648 Prepaid items 162,029 60,548 222,577 Notes receivable 116,779 - 116,779 Land held for resale 3,825,746 3,825,746 Pension asset 23,180 - 23,180 Capital assets Nondepreciable 12,849,348 4,881,023 17,730,371 Depreciable, net 47,788,585 40,548,303 88,336,888 TOTAL ASSETS 98,395,104 56,037,174 154,432,278 DEFERRED OUTFLOWS OF RESOURCES Deferred pension resources 1,522,334 524,942 2,047,276 TOTAL DEFERRED OUTFLOWS OF RESOURCES 1,522,334 524,942 2,047,276 LIABILITIES Accounts and contracts payable 685,493 378,354 1,063,847 Accrued interest payable 99,455 5,283 104,738 Other accrued liabilities 47,080 3,336 50,416 Due to other governmental units 35,337 152,142 187,479 Unearned revenue 14,620 3,950 18,570 Escrow deposits 841,047 - 841,047 Long-term liabilities: Due within one year 4,141,613 331,183 4,472,796 Due in more than one year 20,817,317 5,417,704 26,235,021 TOTAL LIABILITIES 26,681,962 6,291,952 32,973,914 DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES Deferred pension resources 628,126 203,452 831,578 Unavailable revenue - MSA state aid 135,804 - 135,804 TOTAL DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES 763,930 203,452 967,382 NET POSITION Net investment in capital assets 41,077,683 41,014,122 82,091,805 Restricted for Debt service 7,009,231 - 7,009,231 Economic development 2,669,216 2,669,216 Perpetual care 30,489 30,489 Tax increment 860,757 - 860,757 Unrestricted 20,824,170 9,052,590 29,876,760 TOTAL NET POSITION $ 72,471,546 $ 50,066,712 $ 122,538,258 The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement. 19 lZCIOF MontikeHo (This page left blank intentionally) 20 CITY OF MONTICELLO Statement of Activities For the Year Ended December 31, 2016 The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement. 21 Program Revenues Net (Expense) Revenue and Changes in Net Position Operating Capital Charges for Grants and Grants and Governmental Business -type Functions/Programs Expenses Services Contributions Contributions Activities Activities Total Governmental activities General government $ 1,694,111 $ 274,309 $ - $ $ (1,419,802) $ $ (1,419,802) Public safety 2,187,363 894,311 194,586 (1,098,466) (1,098,466) Public works 5,480,074 527,425 194,419 2,690,864 (2,067,366) (2,067,366) Sanitation 600,300 89,956 - - (510,344) (510,344) Transit 41,250 - - (41,250) (41,250) Recreation and culture 3,998,945 1,437,659 508,898 (2,052,388) (2,052,388) Economic development 756,620 301,232 - (455,388) (455,388) Interest and fiscal charges 565,774 - - 97,503 (468,271) (468,271) Total governmental activities 15,324,437 3,524,892 389,005 3,297,265 (8,113,275) (8,113,275) Business -type activities Water Utility 1,168,473 1,172,258 - 187,854 191,639 191,639 Sewage Utility 2,618,887 2,223,252 1,812,602 1,416,967 1,416,967 Liquor 831,809 1,409,406 - 577,597 577,597 Fiber Optics 2,483,262 1,739,566 (743,696) (743,696) Deputy Registrar 345,492 562,891 - 217,399 217,399 Total business -type activities 7,447,923 7,107,373 - 2,000,456 1,659,906 1,659,906 Total primary government $ 22,772,360 $ 10,632,265 $ 389,005 $ 5,297,721 (8,113,275) 1,659,906 (6,453,369) General Revenues: Property taxes 9,270,592 - 9,270,592 Tax increments 668,352 668,352 Franchise taxes 412,217 - 412,217 Unrestricted investment earnings 375,614 128,080 503,694 Gain on sale of capital assets 11,180 5,218 16,398 Special item - transfer of operations - 356,900 356,900 Transfers 969,461 (969,461) - Total general revenues, special item, and tranfers 11,707,416 (479,263) 11,228,153 Change in Net Position 3,594,141 1,180,643 4,774,784 Net Position, January 1 68,877,405 48,886,069 117,763,474 Net Position, December 31 $ 72,471,546 $ 50,066,712 $ 122,538,258 The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement. 21 CITY OF MONTICELLO Balance Sheet Governmental Funds December 31, 2016 The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement 22 Economic Total Total Community Development Debt Capital Nonmajor Governmental General Center Authority Service Projects Funds Funds ASSETS Cash and investments $ 7,091,381 $ 788,331 $ 4,951,330 $ 3,534,824 $ 5,726,923 $ 5,589,167 $ 27,681,956 Receivables Unremitted taxes 29,500 - 1,901 - - - 31,401 Delinquent taxes 61,733 740 - - 62,473 Unremitted special assessments - - 9,975 332 10,307 Delinquent special assessments 325 9,279 137,300 146,904 Deferred special assessments 1,760 3,356,946 676,969 4,035,675 Accrued interest 129,564 - - - - 129,564 Accounts 63,233 11,178 100 - - 74,511 Due from other governmental units 30,398 - - 150,127 87,764 268,289 Prepaid items 134,245 24,907 1,638 - 1,239 162,029 Notes receivable - - - - 116,779 116,779 Land held for resale - - 2,193,957 - 1,631,789 - 3,825,746 TOTAL ASSETS $ 7,542,139 $ 824,416 $ 7,149,666 $ 6,911,024 $ 8,323,440 $ 5,794,949 $ 36,545,634 LIABILITIES Accounts and contracts payable $ 291,777 $ 37,435 $ 6,596 $ 1,248 $ 335,901 $ 11,827 $ 684,784 Other accrued liabilities 47,080 - - - - - 47,080 Due to other governmental units 21,697 10,532 3,108 35,337 Unearned revenue - 14,620 - 14,620 Escrow deposits 841,047 - - - - - 841,047 Total liabilities 1,201,601 62,587 6,596 1,248 339,009 11,827 1,622,868 DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES Unavailable revenue - property taxes 61,733 - 740 - - - 62,473 Unavailable revenue - special assessments 2,085 - 3,366,225 814,271 - 4,182,581 Unavailable revenue - notes receivable - - - 116,779 116,779 Unavailable revenue - grants receivable 150,127 - 150,127 Unavailable revenue - MSA state aid - - - 135,804 - 135,804 Total Deferred Inflows of Resources 63,818 - 740 3,366,225 1,100,202 116,779 4,647,764 FUND BALANCES Nonspendable 134,245 24,907 2,032,395 - 1,631,789 1,239 3,824,575 Restricted - - 2,274,667 3,543,551 - 1,169,016 6,987,234 Assigned - 736,922 2,835,268 - 5,252,440 4,496,088 13,320,718 Unassigned 6,142,475 - - - - - 6,142,475 Total fund balance 6,276,720 761,829 7,142,330 3,543,551 6,884,229 5,666,343 30,275,002 TOTAL LIABILITIES, DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES, AND FUND BALANCES $ 7,542,139 $ 824,416 $ 7,149,666 $ 6,911,024 $ 8,323,440 $ 5,794,949 $ 36,545,634 The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement 22 CITY OF MONTICELLO Reconciliation of the Governmental Funds Balance Sheet to the Statement of Net Position December 31, 2016 Amounts reported for governmental activities in the statement of net position are different because Total fund balances - governmental funds $ 30,275,002 Long-term assets from pensions reported in governmental activities are not financial resources and, therefore, are not reported as assets in the funds. 23,180 Capital assets used in governmental activities are not financial resources and, therefore, are not reported in the funds. Land $ 9,573,164 Construction in progress 3,276,184 Buildings and systems 95,713,651 Machinery and equipment 4,541,125 Accumulated depreciation (53,256,979) 59,847,145 Governmental funds do not report long-term amounts related to pensions. Deferred outflows of resources $ 1,522,334 Deferred inflows of resources (628,126) 894,208 Long-term liabilties that pertain to governmental funds, including bonds payable, are not due and payable in the current period and, therefore, are not reported as fund liabilities. All liabilities, both current and long-term, are reported in the Statement of Net Position. Bonds payable $ (19,956,000) Unamortized bond discounts 21,032 Unamortized bond premiums (180,298) Other post -employment benefits obligations (326,044) Net pension liability (3,532,958) (23,974,268) Internal service funds are used by management to charge the costs of central equipment, information technology, and benefit accrual services to individual funds. The assets and liabilities of the internal service funds are included in governmental activities in the Statement of Net Position. Internal service fund net position included in the governmental activities $ 1,046,875 Less internal services net position allocated to to business -type activities (53,920) 992,955 Some of the city's property taxes, special assessments, and notes receivable will be collected after year-end, but are not available soon enough to pay for currrent period expenditures and, therefore, are reported as deferred inflows of resources in the governmental funds. 4,511,960 Interest on long-term debt is not accrued in governmental funds, but rather is recognized as an expenditure when due. Accrued interest for general obligation bonds is included in the Statement of Net Position. (98,636) NET POSITION OF GOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES $ 72,471,546 The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement. 23 CITY OF MONTICELLO Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance Governmental Funds For the Year Ended December 31, 2016 24 Economic Total Total Community Development Debt Capital Nonmajor Governmental General Center Authority Service Projects Funds Funds Revenues Property taxes $ 6,204,429 $ 364,000 $ 279,422 $ 2,084,000 $ 364,132 $ $ 9,295,983 Tax increments - - 668,352 - - 668,352 Franchise taxes 263,900 - - 70,527 77,790 412,217 Special assessments 242 812,547 171,601 - 984,390 Licenses and permits 668,602 - - 668,602 Intergovernmental 389,005 - 1,652,357 - 2,041,362 Charges for services 351,702 1,395,573 - 475,200 2,222,475 Fines and forfeitures 30,656 - - - - - 30,656 Investment earnings 99,237 14,986 60,528 36,423 54,783 91,155 357,112 Other revenues 263,783 12,273 290,409 - 5,000 17,929 589,394 Total revenues 8,271,556 1,786,832 1,298,711 2,932,970 2,318,400 662,074 17,270,543 Expenditures Current General government 1,489,892 - - - - - 1,489,892 Public safety 2,036,777 - - 2,036,777 Public works 1,802,884 120,326 18,540 1,941,750 Sanitation 600,300 - - 600,300 Transit 41,250 - - 41,250 Recreation and culture 1,021,709 1,654,445 - 80,218 2,756,372 Economic development - - 530,746 - - 530,746 Capital outlay Public works - 4,843,011 49,460 4,892,471 Recreation and culture - - 1,342,558 1,342,558 Debt service Principal 5,681,653 - 5,681,653 Interest and fiscal charges 529,116 - 529,116 Bond issuance costs - - - - 107,050 - 107,050 Total expenditures 6,992,812 1,654,445 530,746 6,210,769 5,070,387 1,490,776 21,949,935 Excess (deficiency) of revenues over expenditures 1,278,744 132,387 767,965 (3,277,799) (2,751,987) (828,702) (4,679,392) Other financing sources (uses) Long-term debt issued - - - 4,900,000 4,900,000 Premium on long-term debt issued - 97,503 97,503 Sale of capital assets 11,180 - - - 11,180 Transfers in - 1,439,136 753,500 2,192,636 Transfers out - (188,500) - (753,500) (281,175) (1,223,175) Total other financing sources (uses) 11,180 - (188,500) 1,439,136 4,244,003 472,325 5,978,144 Net change in fund balances 1,289,924 132,387 579,465 (1,838,663) 1,492,016 (356,377) 1,298,752 Fund balance at beginning of year 4,986,796 629,442 6,562,865 5,382,214 5,392,213 6,022,720 28,976,250 Fund balance at end of year $ 6,276,720 $ 761,829 $ 7,142,330 $ 3,543,551 $ 6,884,229 $ 5,666,343 $ 30,275,002 The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement. 24 CITY OF MONTICELLO Reconciliation of the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds to the Statement of Activities For the Year Ended December 31, 2016 Amounts reported for governmental activities in the Statement of Activities are different because Net change in fund balances --governmental funds $ 1,298,752 Governmental funds reported capital outlays as expenditures. However, in the statement of activities the cost of those assets is allocated over their estimated useful lives and reported as depreciation expense. This is the amount by which capital outlays exceeded depreciation in the current period. Capital outlays $ 5,605,108 Capital contributions 508,898 Disposals (6,858) Depreciation (4,020,765) 2,086,383 Proceeds from long-term debt provide financial resources to governmental funds, but the issuing of debt increases long-term liabilities in the Statement of Net Position. (4,900,000) Repayment of long-term debt principal is an expenditure in the governmental funds, but the repayment reduces long-term liabilities in the Statement of Net Position. 5,681,653 Some expenses reported in the Statement of Activities do not require the use of current financial resources and, therefore, are not reported as expenditures in the governmental funds. Amortization of bond discounts $ (4,703) Amortization of bond premiums 35,633 Change in OPEB obligation (20,481) Change accrued interest payable 55,644 66,093 Long-term pension activity is not reported in governmental funds Pension revenue from state contributions 13,765 Pension expense (643,432) Deferred inflows of resources are revenues included in the change in net position, but are excluded from the change in fund balances until they are available to liquidate liabilities of the current period. Taxes $ (25,391) Special assessments (96,010) Notes receivable (212,500) Grants receivable 150,127 (183,774) Internal service funds are used by management to charge the costs of certain activities to individual funds The net revenue of the internal service funds is reported with governmental activities. Internal service fund activity included in governmental activities $ 200,639 Subtract internal service fund activity allocated to business -type activities (25,938) 174,701 Change in net position of governmental activities $ 3,594,141 The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement. 25 CITY OF MONTICELLO Statement of Net Position Proprietary Funds December 31, 2016 (continued) 26 Governmental Business -Type Activities - Enterprise Funds Activities - Deputy Internal Water Sewage Liquor Fiber Optics Registrar Totals Service Funds ASSETS Current assets Cash and investments $ 4,035,865 $ 2,596,530 $ 1,037,180 $ 303,008 $ 817,006 $ 8,789,589 $ 1,242,277 Receivables Unremitted special assessments 162 - - - - 162 - Deliquent special assessments 14,960 - 14,960 Deferred special assessments 176,102 12,363 - - 188,465 Accounts 217,192 568,485 1,000 151,602 - 938,279 Due from other governmental units - 36,447 - - 44,830 81,277 Inventory - - 480,648 - - 480,648 Prepaid items 12,984 25,515 16,283 3,541 2,225 60,548 - Total current assets 4,457,265 3,239,340 1,535,111 458,151 864,061 10,553,928 1,242,277 Noncurrent assets Capital assets: Land 208,143 984,202 5,600 - - 1,197,945 - Buildings and systems 20,807,724 43,467,040 840,217 14,896,665 88,101 80,099,747 - Machineryandequipment 262,198 1,763,559 134,528 305,726 14,265 2,480,276 977,868 Construction in progress - 3,683,078 - - - 3,683,078 - Total capital assets 21,278,065 49,897,879 980,345 15,202,391 102,366 87,461,046 977,868 Less accumulated depreciation (11,142,752) (27,902,574) (802,991) (2,146,835) (36,568) (42,031,720) (187,080) Total capital assets (net) 10,135,313 21,995,305 177,354 13,055,556 65,798 45,429,326 790,788 TOTAL ASSETS 14,592,578 25,234,645 1,712,465 13,513,707 929,859 55,983,254 2,033,065 DEFERRED OUTFLOWS OF RESOURCES Deferred pension resources 80,760 100,950 222,091 - 121,141 524,942 - (continued) 26 Statement of Net Position Proprietary Funds December 31, 2016 (Continued) LIABILITIES Current liabilities Accounts and contracts payable Accrued interest payable Other accrued liabilities Due to other governmental units Unearned revenue Bonds and loans payable - current Compensated absences due within one year Total current liabilities Noncurrent liabilities Bonds and loans payable - net current portion Compensated absences payable Net pension liability Total noncurrent liabilities TOTAL LIABILITIES DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES Deferred pension resources NET POSITION Net investment in capital assets 10,135,313 17,580,101 177,354 13,055,556 65,798 Unrestricted 4,255,173 2,909,027 964,473 305,914 564,083 TOTAL NET POSITION $ 14,390,486 $ 20,489,128 $ 1,141,827 $ 13,361,470 $ 629,881 Adjustment to reflect the cumulative internal balance for the net effect of the activity between the internal service funds and the enterprise funds over time Net position of business -type activities (page 19) CITY OF MONTICELLO The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement. 41,014,122 65,788 8,998,670 981,087 50,012,792 $ 1,046,875 53,920 $ 50,066,712 27 Governmental Business -Type Activities - Enterprise Funds Activities - Deputy Internal Water Sewage Liquor Fiber Optics Registrar Totals Service Funds $ 17,279 $ 122,633 $ 88,093 $ 149,496 $ 853 $ 378,354 $ 709 - 5,283 - - - 5,283 819 - - 3,336 - - 3,336 - 16,405 2,561 56,240 2,741 74,195 152,142 3,950 - - - - 3,950 - - 289,000 - - 289,000 120,000 9,118 9,118 16,766 - 7,181 42,183 100,613 46,752 428,595 164,435 152,237 82,229 874,248 222,141 - 4,126,204 - - - 4,126,204 605,000 13,829 13,829 17,049 5,483 50,190 159,049 190,971 238,714 525,169 286,456 1,241,310 - 204,800 4,378,747 542,218 - 291,939 5,417,704 764,049 251,552 4,807,342 706,653 152,237 374,168 6,291,952 986,190 31,300 39,125 86,076 - 46,951 203,452 - The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement. 41,014,122 65,788 8,998,670 981,087 50,012,792 $ 1,046,875 53,920 $ 50,066,712 27 lZCIOF MontikeHo (This page left blank intentionally) 28 Statement of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Net Position Proprietary Funds For the Year Ended December 31, 2016 Sales and cost of sales Net sales Cost of sales Gross profit Operating revenues Charges for services Other Total operating revenues Operating expenses Personal services Materials and supplies Other services and charges Content and access charges Depreciation Total operating expenses Operating income (loss) Nonoperating revenues (expenses) Investment earnings Interest expense Gain on sale of capital asset Total Nonoperating revenes (expenses) Income (loss) before capital contributions, special items, and transfers Capital contributions Special item - transfer of operations Transfers in Transfers out Change in net position Net Position, January 1 Net Position, December 31 CITY OF MONTICELLO 29 Governmental Business -Type Activities - Enterprise Funds Activities - Deputy Internal Water Sewage Liquor Fiber Optics Registrar Totals Service Funds $ 5,448,584 $ 5,448,584 (4,041,224) (4,041,224) 1,407,360 1,407,360 $ 1,130,260 $ 2,195,310 - $ 1,692,935 $ 561,775 5,580,280 $ 526,285 41,998 27,942 2,046 46,631 1,116 119,733 - 1,172,258 2,223,252 2,046 1,739,566 562,891 5,700,013 526,285 258,066 347,717 571,520 310,161 309,701 1,797,165 33,504 181,393 17,828 26,445 160,835 4,342 390,843 41,101 230,330 1,046,286 197,571 1,210,958 34,889 2,720,034 169,454 - - - 389,411 - 389,411 - 502,447 1,142,479 40,512 419,555 3,185 2,108,178 83,907 1,172,236 2,554,310 836,048 2,490,920 352,117 7,405,631 327,966 22 (331,058) 573,358 (751,354) 210,774 (298,258) 198,319 67,959 32,402 12,663 5,783 9,273 128,080 18,502 - (68,230) - - - (68,230) (16,182) 5,218 - - - 5,218 - 73,177 (35,828) 12,663 5,783 9,273 65,068 2,320 73,199 (366,886) 586,021 (745,571) 220,047 (233,190) 200,639 187,854 1,812,602 - - - 2,000,456 - - - 356,900 356,900 350,000 350,000 (199,327) (770,134) (350,000) - - (1,319,461) - 61,726 675,582 236,021 (38,671) 220,047 1,154,705 200,639 14,328,760 19,813,546 905,806 13,400,141 409,834 846,236 $ 14,390,486 $ 20,489,128 $ 1,141,827 $ 13,361,470 $ 629,881 $ 1,046,875 Adjustment to reflect the consolidation of internal service fund related to enterprise funds 25,938 Change in net position of business -type activities (page 21) $ 1,180,643 The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement. 29 Statement of Cash Flows Proprietary Funds For the Year Ended December 31, 2016 Cash flows from operating activities Cash received from customers and users Cash from interfund services provided Cash paid to suppliers for goods and services Cash paid to employees Cash paid to other funds for services provided Net cash provided (used) by operating activities Cash flows from noncapital financing activities Transfers from other funds Transfers to other funds Net cash provided (used) by noncapital financing activities Cash flows from capital and related financing activities Capital contributions Acquisition of capital assets Long-term debt issued Principal paid on long-term debt Interest and fiscal charges paid on long-term debt Net cash provided (used) by capital and related financing activities Cash flows from investing activities Interest on investments Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents Cash and cash equivalents, January 1 Cash and cash equivalents, December 31 CITY OF MONTICELLO (continued) 30 Governmental Business -Type Activities - Enterprise Funds Activities - Deputy Internal Water Sewage Liquor Fiber Optics Registrar Totals Service Funds $ 1,198,109 $ 2,256,947 $ 5,450,088 $ 1,613,032 $ 558,669 $ 11,076,845 $ - - - - - - - 526,285 (397,914) (1,054,939) (4,202,188) (1,657,929) (12,063) (7,325,033) (195,696) (238,850) (325,569) (530,193) (322,670) (289,191) (1,706,473) (13,234) (12,845) (14,907) (26,929) (23,295) (91,210) - 548,111 863,594 702,800 (394,496) 234,120 1,954,129 330,589 - - - 350,000 - 350,000 - (199,327) (770,134) (350,000) - (1,319,461) (199,327) (770,134) (350,000) 350,000 (969,461) 187,854 1,776,155 - 1,964,009 (975,000) (2,270,325) (24,404) (3,269,729) (159,041) 1,413,065 1,413,065 (570,830) (570,830) (115,000) (78,002) (78,002) (16,259) (787,146) 270,063 - - (24,404) (541,487) (290,300) 67,959 32,402 12,663 5,783 9,273 128,080 18,502 (370,403) 395,925 365,463 (38,713) 218,989 571,261 58,791 4,406,268 2,200,605 671,717 341,721 598,017 8,218,328 1,183,486 $ 4,035,865 $ 2,596,530 $ 1,037,180 $ 303,008 $ 817,006 $ 8,789,589 $ 1,242,277 (continued) 30 Statement of Cash Flows Proprietary Funds For the Year Ended December 31, 2016 (Continued) Reconciliation of operating income (loss) to net cash provided (used) by operating activities Operating income (loss) Adjustments to reconcile operating income (loss) to net cash provided (used) by operating activities Depreciation and amortization (Increase) decrease in assets Special assessments receivable Accounts receivable, net Due from other governmental units Inventory Prepaid items (Increase) decrease in deferred outflows Deferred pension resources Increase (decrease) in liabilities Accounts and contracts payable Other liabilities Due to other governmental units Unearned revenue Compensated absences Net pension liability Increase (decrease) in deferred inflows Deferred pension resources Net cash provided (used) by operating activities Schedule of noncash investing, capital and financing activities: Net amortization of bond premium (discount) Disposal of capital assets CITY OF MONTICELLO $ - $ (2,985) $ $ - $ $ (2,985) $ $ 34,000 $ - $ $ 78,419 $ $ 112,419 $ The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement. 31 Governmental Business -Type Activities - Enterprise Funds Activities - Deputy Internal Water Sewage Liquor Fiber Optics Registrar Totals Service Funds $ 22 $ (331,058) $ 573,358 $ (751,354) $ 210,774 $ (298,258) $ 198,319 502,447 1,142,479 40,512 419,555 3,185 2,108,178 83,907 13,953 (5,420) - - - 8,533 - 14,348 39,115 (1,000) (120,258) 40,608 (27,187) - - - (44,830) (44,830) 71,708 - 71,708 - (1,733) (1,147) (2,198) 13,019 (1,023) 6,918 26,873 (66,711) (83,389) (183,456) - (100,067) (433,623) - (12,147) (5,084) (24,945) 73,077 322 31,223 (12,014) - - 458 (6,276) - (5,818) 14,455 2,561 3,580 (9,750) 4,574 15,420 (2,450) - - - (2,450) - 7,487 7,487 9,073 (12,509) 2,917 14,455 33,504 71,151 88,939 195,665 106,726 462,481 - 7,289 9,111 20,045 10,934 47,379 - $ 548,111 $ 863,594 $ 702,800 $ (394,496) $ 234,120 $ 1,954,129 $ 330,589 $ - $ (2,985) $ $ - $ $ (2,985) $ $ 34,000 $ - $ $ 78,419 $ $ 112,419 $ The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement. 31 Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2016 NOTE 1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES The basic financial statements of the City of Monticello, Minnesota (the city) have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles (GAAP) generally accepted in the United States of America as applied to governmental units, as applied by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB). GASB is the accepted standard-setting body for establishing governmental accounting and financial reporting principles. The significant accounting policies of the city are described as follows: A. Reportina entitv The city of Monticello was incorporated 1856 and is under Minnesota Statutes with a mayor -council form of government. The city falls under section 501(a) of the Internal Revenue Code. The five -member mayor -council is elected on staggered, even -numbered years. Councilors are elected at -large to four-year terms while the mayor is elected to a two-year term. The governing body appoints an administrator to implement policies and oversee daily operations. The accompanying financial statements include all funds, departments, agencies, boards, commissions, and other organizations that comprise the city, along with any component units. Component units are legally separate entities for which the city (primary government) is financially accountable, or for which the exclusion of the component unit would render the financial statements of the primary government misleading. The criteria used to determine if the primary government is financially accountable for a component unit includes whether or not the primary government appoints the voting majority of the potential component unit's governing body, is able to impose its will on the potential component unit, is in a relationship of financial benefit or burden with the potential component unit, or is fiscally depended upon by the potential component unit. The Monticello Economic Development Authority (EDA) is fiscally dependent upon the city, and its governing body consists of city council members and other members appointed by the city council. The city is able to impose its will on the EDA by significantly influencing the programs, projects, activities, or level of services performed or provided by the EDA. There is a potential for the EDA to provide specific financial benefits to, or impose specific burdens on, the city. Therefore, the EDA is included as a component unit of the city. The EDA's financial data has been blended with that of the city (i.e. reported as though its funds were funds of the city) and reported as a special revenue fund. Therefore, the EDA does not issue separate financial statements. CITY OF MONTICELLO The mayor and council are responsible for appointing some members of other organizations. However, the city's accountability for these organizations does not extend beyond making appointments. B. Government -wide and fund financial statements The government -wide financial statements (i.e., the statement of net position and the statement of activities) report information on all of the activities of the primary government and its component unit. For the most part, the effect of inter -fund activity has been removed from these statements. Governmental activities, which normally are supported by taxes and intergovernmental revenues, are reported separately from business -type activities, which rely to a significant extent on fees and charges for support. The statement of activities demonstrates the degree to which the direct expenses of a given function or segment is offset by program revenues. Direct expenses are those that are clearly identifiable with a specific function. Program revenues include 1) charges to customers or applicants who purchase, use, or directly benefit from goods, services, or privileges provided by a given function or segment and 2) grants and contributions that are restricted to meeting the operation or capital requirements of a particular function or segment. Taxes and other items not properly included among program revenues are reported instead as general revenues. Separate financial statements are provided for governmental funds and proprietary funds. Major individual governmental funds and major individual enterprise funds are reported as separate columns in the fund financial statements. The city applies restricted resources first when an expense is incurred for which both restricted and unrestricted resources are available. Depreciation expense is included in the direct expense of each function. Interest on long-term debt is considered an indirect expense and is reported separately on the Statement of Activities. Aggregated information for the remaining nonmajor funds are reported in single columns in the respective fund financial statements. C. Measurement focus, basis of accountina, and financial statement presentation The government -wide financial statements are reported using the economic resources measurement focus and the accrual basis of accounting, as are the proprietary fund financial statements. Revenues are recorded when earned and 32 Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2016 expenses are recorded when a liability is incurred, regardless of the timing of related cash flows. Property taxes and special assessments, if levied, are recognized as revenues in the year for which they are levied. Grants and similar items are recognized as revenue as soon as all eligibility requirements imposed by the provider have been met. Governmental fund financial statements are reported using the current financial resources measurement focus and the modified accrual basis of accounting. Revenues are recognized as soon as they are both measurable and available. Revenues are considered available when they are collectible with the current period or soon enough thereafter to pay liabilities of the current period. For this purpose, the city considers revenue to be available if they are collected within 60 days of the end of the current fiscal period. Expenditures generally are recorded when a liability is incurred, as under accrual accounting. However, debt service expenditures, as well as expenditures related to claims and judgments, net pension liabilities, and compensated absences, which are recognized as expenditures to the extent they have matured. Capital asset acquisitions are reported as capital outlay expenditures in the governmental funds. Proceeds from long-term debt are reported as other financing sources. Property taxes, franchise taxes, licenses, and investment interest associated with the current fiscal period are all considered to be susceptible to accrual and have been recognized as revenues of the current fiscal period. All other revenue items are considered to be measurable and available only when cash is received by the city. Since governmental fund statements are presented using a measurement focus and basis of accounting different from that used in the government -wide statements' governmental column, a reconciliation is presented that briefly explains the adjustments necessary to reconcile ending net position and the change in net position. In the fund financial statements, financial transactions and accounts of the city are organized on the basis of funds. The operation of each fund is considered to be an independent fiscal and separate accounting entity, with a self -balancing set of accounts recording cash and/or other financial resources together with all related liabilities and residual equities or balances, and changes therein, which are segregated for the purpose of carrying on specific activities or attaining certain objectives in accordance with special regulations, restriction, or limitations. Maior Governmental Funds — The major governmental funds reported by the city are as follows: CITY OF MONTICELLO General Fund — The General Fund is used to account for all financial resources except those required to be accounted for in another fund. Community Center Fund — The Community Center (special revenue) Fund accounts for the revenues and expenditures related to the community center. In addition to a property tax allocation, the community center generates significant revenue from charges for memberships, program activities, and space rentals. Economic Development Authority (EDA) Fund — The EDA (special revenue) Fund is used to account for revenues and expenditures related to the blended component unit. Tax increments, generated mainly by economic and redevelopment districts, are the EDA's primary revenue source. Debt Service Fund — The Debt Service Fund is used to account for the accumulation of resources for and the payment of long-term debt principal, interest, and related costs. Capital Projects Fund — The Capital Projects Fund is used to account for financial resources to be used for the acquisition or construction of major capital facilities (other than those financed by proprietary funds). Maior Proprietary Funds — The city reports the following major proprietary funds: Water Fund — The Water (enterprise) Fund is used to account for all activities necessary to provide water services to the residents and businesses of the city. Sewage Fund — The Sewage (enterprise) Fund is used to account for all activities necessary to provide sewage services to the residents and businesses of the city. Liquor Fund — The Liquor (enterprise) Fund is used to account for the operations of the city's liquor store. Fiber Optics Fund — The Fiber Optics (enterprise) Fund is used to account for all activities necessary to provide fiber optic services to the residents and businesses of the city. Deputy Registrar Fund — The Deputy Registrar (enterprise) Fund is used to account for the operation of city's department of motor vehicles. 33 Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2016 Additionally, the city reports the following fund type: Internal Service Funds — These funds account for the city's information technology, benefit accrual and central equipment services. Internal service funds operate in a manner similar to enterprise funds; however, they provide services primarily to other city departments. As a general rule, the effect of inter -fund activity has been eliminated from the government -wide financial statements. Exceptions to this general rule are charges between the city's enterprise funds and various other functions of the city. Elimination of these charges would distort the direct costs and program revenues of the various functions concerned. Amounts reported as program revenues include 1) charges to customers or applicants for goods, services, or privileges provided, 2) operating grants and contributions, and 3) capital grants and contributions, including special assessments. Internally dedicated resources are reported as general revenues rather than as program revenues. Likewise, general revenues include all taxes the city has the authority to impose. Proprietary funds distinguish operating revenues and expenses from non- operating items. Operating revenues and expenses generally result from providing services and producing and delivering goods in connection with a proprietary fund's principal ongoing operations. The principal operating revenues of the city's enterprise and internal service funds are charges to customers for sales and services. Operating expenses for enterprise and internal service funds include cost of sales and services, administrative expenses, and depreciation on capital assets. All revenue and expenses not meeting this definition are reported as non-operating revenues and expenses. Aggregated information for the internal service funds is reported in a single column in the proprietary fund financial statements. Because the principal user of the internal services is the city's governmental activities, the financial statements of the internal service funds are consolidated into the governmental column when presented in the government -wide financial statements. The cost of these services is reported in the appropriate functional activity. D. Cash and Investments Cash and investments include balances from all funds that are combined and invested to the extent available in savings accounts, certificates of deposit, U.S. government obligations, and other securities authorized by state statutes. Earnings from investments are allocated to the respective funds on the basis of applicable participation by each fund. CITY OF MONTICELLO For purposes of the statement of cash flows, the city considers all highly liquid debt instruments with an original maturity from the time of purchase by the city of three months or less to be cash equivalents. The proprietary fund's equity in the government -wide cash and investment management pool is considered to be cash equivalent. Investments are generally stated at fair value, except for investments in external investment pools, which are stated at amortized cost. Short-term highly liquid debt instruments (including commercial paper, banker's acceptances, and U.S. treasury and agency obligations) purchased with a remaining maturity of one year or less are reported at amortized cost. Investment income is accrued at the balance sheet date. The city categorizes its fair value measurements within the fair value hierarchy established by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The hierarchy is based on the valuation inputs used to measure the fair value of the asset as follows: • Level 1 inputs are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets • Level 2 inputs are significant other observable inputs • Level 3 inputs are significant unobservable inputs. Debt securities classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy are valued using a matrix pricing technique. Matrix pricing is used to value securities based on the securities' relationship to benchmark quoted prices. See Note 2 for the city's recurring fair value measurements as of December 31, 2016. E. Property Taxes Property tax levies are set by the city council each year, and are certified to Wright County for collection in the following year. In Minnesota, counties act as collection agents for all property taxes. Wright County spreads all levies over taxable property. Such taxes become a lien on January 1 and are recorded as receivables by the city on that date. Property taxes may be paid by taxpayers in two equal installments on May 15 and October 15. Wright County provides tax settlements to cities and other taxing districts several times throughout the year. Taxes which remain unpaid at December 31 are classified as delinquent taxes receivable and are offset by deferred inflows of resources in the governmental funds financial statements. Within the governmental fund financial statements, the city recognizes property tax revenue when it becomes both measurable and available to finance expenditures of the current period. The portion of delinquent taxes not collected 34 Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2016 by the city in January is fully offset by deferred inflows of resources because it is not available to finance current expenditures. Deferred inflows of resources in governmental activities are susceptible to full accrual on the government -wide financial statements. F. Special Assessments Special assessments are levied against the benefited properties for the assessable costs of special assessment improvement projects in accordance with Minnesota Statutes. The city usually adopts assessment rolls when individual public improvement projects are complete or substantially complete. The assessments are collectible over a term of years generally consistent with the term of years of the related bond issue. Collection of annual installments (including interest) is handled by the county in the same manner as property taxes. Property owners are allowed to prepay total future installments without interest or prepayment penalties. Once a special assessment roll is adopted, the amount attributed to each parcel is a lien upon that property until full payment is made or the amount is determined to be excessive by the city council or court action. If special assessments are allowed to go delinquent, the property is subject to tax forfeited sale and the first proceeds of that sale (after costs, penalties, and expenses of sale) are remitted to the city in payment of delinquent special assessments. Generally, the city will collect the full amount of its special assessments not adjusted by city council or court action. Pursuant to state statutes, a property shall be subject to tax forfeit sale after three years of delinquency except for homesteaded, agricultural or seasonal recreational property, which is subject to sale after five years. These assessments are recorded as delinquent (levied, but unremitted) and deferred (certified, but not yet levied) special assessments receivable, and are offset by deferred inflows of resources in the governmental fund financial statements. Unremitted special assessment amounts collected by Wright County are recorded as unremitted special assessments. G. Receivables Utility and miscellaneous accounts receivable are reported at gross. Since the city is generally able to certify delinquent amounts to the county for collection as special assessments, no allowance for uncollectible accounts has been provided on current receivables. CITY OF MONTICELLO The city utilizes an allowance for uncollectible accounts to value its receivables only in the proprietary Fiber Optics Fund. Account (trade) receivables are carried at original billing amount less an estimate made for doubtful receivables based on a review of all outstanding amounts on a regular basis. Management determines the allowance for doubtful accounts by identifying troubled accounts and by using historical experience applied to an aging of accounts. With approval from council, trade receivables are written off when deemed uncollectible. Recoveries of trade receivables previously written off are recorded when received. A receivable is considered past due if any portion of the receivable balance is outstanding for more than 30 days. Interest is charged on receivables that are outstanding for more than 30 days. Accrual of interest is not suspended until a receivable is determined to be uncollectible. Provisions for bad debts would be insignificant and none has been made for 2016. Interest receivable is recorded as revenue in the year the interest is earned and is available to pay liabilities of the current period. The interest receivable balance is reported as one amount in the General Fund while all other funds receive interest revenue distributions in cash. H. Inventories The inventories of the proprietary funds are stated at cost on the first -in, first -out basis. Enterprise fund inventory consists of merchandise held for resale at the city -owned Hi -Way Liquors store. I. Prepaid Items Payments to vendors for services that will benefit future accounting periods are recorded as prepaid. Prepaid items are accounted for using the consumption method. Fund balance in an amount equal to the prepaid balance in the related funds is not available for appropriation. J. Notes Receivable Notes receivable consist of loans made by the city to area businesses for development or redevelopment purposes. The terms and interest rates of the individual loans vary. Notes receivable are offset by deferred inflows of resources in the governmental funds. 35 Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2016 K. Land Held for Resale Land held for resale is recorded in the governmental fund which purchased it at the lower of cost or market. Fund balances are nonspendable or restricted in an amount equal to the land's carrying value is reported in the governmental funds as these assets are not available for appropriation. L. Capital Assets Capital assets, which include property, plant, equipment, and infrastructure assets (roads, bridges, sidewalks, and similar items) are reported in the applicable governmental or business -type activities columns in the government - wide financial statements. Such assets are capitalized at historical cost, or estimated historical cost for assets where actual historical cost is not available. Donated assets are recorded as capital assets at their estimated acquisition value at the date of donation. The city restructured the capitalization policy which had a single threshold level of $5,000 or more for capitalizing capital assets. The restructured policy divides each asset into a class with a related threshold as follows: Class of Asset Threshold Level Land $1 Land improvements $50,000 Building/building improvements $20,000 Primary infrastructure and utility $75,000 Secondary infrastructure $25,000 Equipment $10,000 Software and non -tangible $10,000 The cost of normal maintenance and repairs that does not add to the value of the asset or materially extend asset lives is not capitalized. The city has elected to fully capitalize the infrastructure capital assets of its governmental activities regardless of their acquisition date or amount. Capital assets are recorded in the government -wide and proprietary fund financial statements, but are not reported in the governmental funds financial statements. Interest incurred during the construction phase of capital assets for business -type activities is included as part of the capitalized value of the assets constructed. Capital assets are depreciated using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives. Since surplus assets are generally sold for an immaterial CITY OF MONTICELLO amount when declared as no longer needed for city purposes, no salvage value is taken into consideration for depreciation purposes. Useful lives vary from 10 to 40 years for infrastructure; 5 to 20 years for vehicles, machinery, and furniture and equipment; 12 to 40 years for buildings; and 10 to 20 years for improvements other than buildings. Capital assets not being depreciated include land and construction in progress. M. Deferred Outflows of Resources In addition to assets, the statement of net position and/or balance sheet will sometimes report a separate section for deferred outflows of resources. This separate financial statement element represents a consumption of net position that applies to future periods and so will not be recognized as an outflow of resources (expense/expenditure) until that time. The city has only one type of item, which arises under a full accrual basis of accounting, that qualifies for reporting in this category. Accordingly, the item, deferred pension resources, is reported only in the statement of net position. This item results from actuarial calculations and current year pension contributions made subsequent to the measurement date. N. Long -Term Liabilities In the government -wide and proprietary fund financial statements, long-term debt and other long-term obligations are reported as liabilities. Bond premiums and discounts, if material, are deferred and amortized over the life of the bonds using the straight-line method. In the fund financial statements, governmental fund types recognize bond premiums and discounts during the current period. The face amount of debt issued is reported as other financing sources. Premiums received on debt issuances are reported as other financing sources while discounts on debt issuances are reported as other financing uses. Issuance costs, whether or not withheld from the actual debt proceeds received, are reported as debt service expenditures. O. Compensated Absences Payable City employees earn vacation or paid -time -off (PTO) based upon the number of completed years of service. The city compensates employees for unused vacation/PTO upon termination of employment. Some non -PTO employees are entitled to paid sick leave at various rates for each month of full-time service. Full-time employees who resign or leave city employment voluntarily and in good standing, after giving proper notice, shall be compensated for up to 50 days of unused sick leave under the following guidelines: 36 Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2016 For union employees, one-fourth of the unused sick leave times the hourly rate at the time of giving notice is paid. After five years of non-union employment, one-fourth of the unused sick leave times the hourly rate at the time of giving notice is paid. After 10 years of employment, all employees accrue one-half of the unused sick leave, times the hourly rate at the time of giving notice. All compensated absences are accrued when incurred in the government -wide and proprietary fund financial statements. The liability for governmental funds is recorded in the internal service Benefit Accrual Fund. Resignations and retirements of employees reduce the liability in the Benefit Accrual Fund or the applicable enterprise fund. P. Pensions For purposes of measuring the net pension liability, deferred outflows/inflows of resources, and pension expense, information about the fiduciary net position of the Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) and additions to/deductions from PERA's fiduciary net position have been determined on the same basis as they are reported by PERA except that PERA's fiscal year end in June 30. For this purpose, plan contributions are recognized as of employer payroll paid dates and benefit payments and refunds are recognized when due and payable in accordance with the benefit terms. Investments are reported at fair value. The PERA has a special funding situation created by a direct aid contribution made by the state of Minnesota. The direct aid is a result of the merger of the Minneapolis Employees Retirement Fund into the PERA on January 1, 2015. Q. Deferred Inflows of Resources In addition to liabilities, the statement of net position and/or balance sheet will sometimes report a separate section for deferred inflows of resources. This separate financial statement element represents an acquisition of net position that applies to future periods and so will not be recognized as an inflow of resources (revenue) until that time. The city has three types of items that qualify for reporting in this category. First, unavailable revenue, which arises under both the full- and modified- accrual bases of accounting, is reported in the statement of net position and the governmental funds balance sheet. Governmental activities report unavailable revenue from MSA state aid, and the governmental funds report unavailable revenue from five sources: property taxes, special assessments, notes receivable, grants receivable, and MSA state aid. These amounts are deferred and recognized as an inflow of resources in the period CITY OF MONTICELLO the amounts become available. Second, deferred pension resources, which arises under a full accrual basis of accounting, is reported only in the statement of net position. These amounts are the result of actuarial calculations involving net differences between projected and actuarial earnings on plan investments and changes in proportion, and are deferred and recognized as an inflow of resources in accordance with actuarial calculations. R. Net Position In the government -wide and proprietary fund financial statements, net position represents the difference between assets and deferred outflows of resources, and liabilities and deferred inflows of resources. Net position is displayed in three components: • Net investment in capital assets — Consists of capital assets, net of accumulated depreciation, reduced by any outstanding debt attributable to acquire capital assets. • Restricted net position — Consists of net position restricted when there are limitations imposed on their use through external restrictions imposed by creditors, grantors, or laws or regulations of other governments. • Unrestricted net position — All other net position that does not meet the definition of "restricted" or "net investment in capital assets." S. Fund Balance Classifications In the fund financial statements, governmental funds report fund balance in classifications that disclose constraints for which amounts in those funds can be spent. These classifications are as follows: • Nonspendable — Consists of amounts that are not in spendable form, such as prepaid items, inventory, and other long-term assets. • Restricted — Consists of amounts related to externally imposed constraints established by creditors, grantors, or contributors; or constraints imposed by state statutory provisions. • Committed — Consists of internally imposed constraints that are established by resolution by the city council, which is the city's highest level of decision-making authority. Those committed amounts cannot be used for any other purpose unless the city council modifies or rescinds the commitment by resolution. 37 Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2016 Assigned – Consists of internally imposed constraints. These constraints consist of amounts intended to be used by the city for specific purposes but do not meet the criteria to be classified as restricted or committed. In governmental funds, assigned amounts represent intended uses established by the governing body itself or by an official to which the governing body delegates the authority. Pursuant to city council resolution, the council, city administrator, or finance director are authorized to establish assignments of fund balance. • Unassigned – The residual classification for the General Fund which also reflects negative residual amounts in other funds. When both restricted and unrestricted resources are available for use, it is the city's policy to first use restricted resources, then use unrestricted resources as they are needed. When committed, assigned, or unassigned resources are available for use, it is the city's policy to use resources in the following order: 1) committed, 2) assigned, and 3) unassigned. T. Budget Budgets for the General Fund and major special revenue funds are adopted on a basis consistent with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Reported budget amounts are as originally adopted or as amended by city council -approved supplemental appropriations and budget transfers. No supplemental budget amendments were adopted during the year. Budget appropriations lapse at year-end. The legal level of budgetary control is at the department level in the General Fund and at the fund level in the major special revenue funds. U. Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses/expenditures during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. V. Future Change in Accounting Standards In June 2015 GASB issued Statement No. 74, Financial Reporting for Postemployment Benefits Plans other than Pension Plans, and Statement No. CITY OF MONTICELLO 75, Accounting and Financial Reporting for Postemployment Benefits other than Pensions. Both statements replace the requirements of GASB Statements related to postemployment benefits other than pensions (OPEB). Statement No. 74 is intended to make the OPEB accounting and financial reporting consistent with the pension standards outlined in Statement No. 67. It applies to OPEB plans, and parallels Statement No. 67 and replaces Statement No. 43. This statement is effective for the city's fiscal year ending December 31, 2017. Statement No. 75 is intended to make OPEB accounting and financial reporting consistent with the pension standards outlined in Statement No. 68. This will include recognizing a net OPEB liability in accrual basis financial statements. It applies to government employers who provide OPEB plans to their employees. It parallels Statement No. 68 and replaces Statement No. 45. This statement is effective for the city's fiscal year ending December 31, 2018. In January 2016 GASB issued Statement No. 80, Blending Requirements for Certain Component Units – An Amendment of GASB Statement No. 14. The objective of this Statement is to improve financial reporting by clarifying the financial statement presentation requirements for certain component units. This Statement amends the blending requirements established in paragraph 53 of Statement No. 14, The Financial Reporting Entity, as amended and the blending requirements for the financial statement presentation of component units of all state and local governments. The additional criterion requires blending of a component unit incorporated as a not-for-profit corporation in which the primary government is the sole corporate member. The additional criterion does not apply to component units included in the financial reporting entity pursuant to the provisions of Statement No. 39, Determining Whether Certain Organizations Are Component Units. The requirements of this Statement are effective for reporting periods beginning after June 15, 2016. In March 2016 GASB issued Statement No. 81, Irrevocable Split -Interest Agreements. The objective of this Statement is to improve accounting and financial reporting for irrevocable split -interest agreements by providing recognition and measurement guidance for situations in which a government is a beneficiary of the agreement. Split -interest agreements are a type of giving agreement used by donors to provide resources to two or more beneficiaries, including governments. Split -interest agreements can be created through trusts—or other legally enforceable agreements with characteristics that are equivalent to split -interest agreements—in which a donor transfers resources to an intermediary to hold and administer for the benefit of a government and at least one other beneficiary. Examples of these types of agreements include 38 Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2016 charitable lead trusts, charitable remainder trusts, and life -interests in real estate. This Statement requires that a government that receives resources pursuant to an irrevocable split -interest agreement recognize assets, liabilities, and deferred inflows of resources at the inception of the agreement. Furthermore, this Statement requires that a government recognize assets representing its beneficial interests in irrevocable split -interest agreements that are administered by a third party, if the government controls the present service capacity of the beneficial interests. This Statement requires that a government recognize revenue when the resources become applicable to the reporting period. The requirements of this Statement are effective for financial statements for periods beginning after December 15, 2016. In March 2016 GASB issued Statement No. 82, Pension Issues — An Amendment of GASB Statements No. 67, No. 68, and No. 73. The objective of this Statement is to address certain issues that have been raised with respect to Statements No. 67, Financial Reporting for Pension Plans, No. 68, Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pensions, and No. 73, Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pensions and Related Assets That Are Not within the Scope of GASB Statement 68, and Amendments to Certain Provisions of GASB Statements 67 and 68. Specifically, this Statement addresses issues regarding (1) the presentation of payroll -related measures in required supplementary information, (2) the selection of assumptions and the treatment of deviations from the guidance in an Actuarial Standard of Practice for financial reporting purposes, and (3) the classification of payments made by employers to satisfy employee (plan member) contribution requirements. In November 2016 GASB issued Statement No. 83, Certain Asset Retirement Obligations. This Statement addresses accounting and financial reporting for certain asset retirement obligations (AROs). An ARO is a legally enforceable liability associated with the retirement of a tangible capital asset. A government that has legal obligations to perform future asset retirement activities related to its tangible capital assets should recognize a liability based on the guidance in this Statement. This Statement establishes criteria for determining the timing and pattern of recognition of a liability and a corresponding deferred outflow of resources for AROs. This Statement requires that recognition occur when the liability is both incurred and reasonably estimable. The determination of when the liability is incurred should be based on the occurrence of external laws, regulations, contracts, or court judgments, together with the occurrence of an internal event that obligates a government to perform asset retirement activities. Laws and regulations may require governments to take specific actions to retire certain tangible capital assets at the end of the useful lives of those capital assets, such as decommissioning nuclear reactors and dismantling and removing sewage treatment plants. Other obligations to retire tangible capital assets may arise from contracts or court judgments. Internal obligating events CITY OF MONTICELLO include the occurrence of contamination, placing into operation a tangible capital asset that is required to be retired, abandoning a tangible capital asset before it is placed into operation, or acquiring a tangible capital asset that has an existing ARO. The requirements of this Statement are effective for reporting periods beginning after June 15, 2018. NOTE 2. CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS, AND INVESTMENTS A. Components of Cash and Investments Cash and investments at year-end consist of the following: Deposits Investments Cash on hand $ 12,531,994 25,174,288 7,540 Total cash and investments — Statement of Net Position $ 37,713,822 B. Deposits In accordance with applicable Minnesota Statutes, the city maintains deposits at depository banks authorized by the city council, including checking accounts and non-negotiable certificates of deposit. The following is considered the most significant risk associated with deposits. Custodial Credit Risk — In the case of deposits, this is the risk that in the event of a bank failure, the city's deposits may be lost. Minnesota Statutes require that all deposits be protected by federal deposit insurance, corporate surety bond, or collateral. The fair value of collateral pledged must equal 110 percent of the deposits not covered by federal deposit insurance or corporate surety bonds. Authorized collateral includes treasury bills, notes, and bonds; issues of U.S. government agencies; general obligations rated "A" or better; revenue obligations rated "AX or better; irrevocable standard letters of credit issued by the Federal Home Loan Bank; and certificates of deposit. Minnesota Statutes require that securities pledged as collateral be held in safekeeping in a restricted account at the Federal Reserve Bank or in an account at a trust department of a commercial bank or other financial institution that is not owned or controlled by the financial institution furnishing the collateral. The city's investment policy does not provide further requirements regarding custodial credit risk. 39 Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2016 At year-end, the carrying amount of the city's deposits was $12,531,994 while the balance on bank records was $12,919,690. All deposits were covered by federal depository insurance, surety bonds, or by collateral held by the city's agent in the city's name. C. Cash on hand Cash on hand consists of cash in the possession of the city, including petty cash and change funds. D. Investments Custodial Credit Risk — For investments, this is the risk that in the event of a failure of the counterparty to an investment transaction (typically a broker-dealer) the city would not be able to recover the value of its investments or collateral securities that are in the possession of an outside party. The city's investment policy does not provide additional requirements beyond state statutes, but the city typically limits its exposure by purchasing insured or registered investments, or by the control of who holds the securities. Credit Risk — This is the risk that an issuer or other counterparty to an investment will not fulfill its obligations. Minnesota Statutes limit the city's investments to direct obligations or obligations guaranteed by the United States or its agencies; shares of investment companies registered under the Federal Investment Company Act of 1940 that receive the highest credit rating, are rated in one of the two highest rating categories by a statistical rating agency, and all of the investments have a final maturity of 13 months or less; general obligations rated "A" or better; revenue obligations rated "AX or better; general obligations of the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency rated "A" or better; bankers' acceptances of United States banks eligible for purchase by the Federal Reserve System; commercial paper issued by United States corporations or their Canadian subsidiaries, rated of the highest quality category by at least two nationally recognized rating agencies, and maturing in 270 days or less; Guaranteed Investment Contracts guaranteed by a United States commercial bank, domestic CITY OF MONTICELLO branch of a foreign bank, or a United States insurance company, and with a credit quality in one of the top two highest categories; repurchase or reverse purchase agreements and securities lending agreements with financial institutions qualified as a "depository" by the government entity, with banks that are members of the Federal Reserve System with capitalization exceeding $10,000,000; that are a primary reporting dealer in U.S. government securities to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York; or certain Minnesota securities broker-dealers. The city's investment policy does not further address credit risk. Concentration Risk — This is the risk associated with investing a significant portion of the city's investment (5 percent or more) in the securities of a single issuer, excluding U.S. guaranteed investments (such as treasuries), investment pools, and mutual funds. The city's investment policy requires that no more than 5 percent of the overall portfolio may be invested in the securities of a single issuer, except for the securities of the U.S. government and in agencies or an external investment pool. More than 5 percent of the city's investments are invested with the Federal Home Loan Bank. These investments are 7.5 percent of the city's total investments. Interest Rate Risk — This is the risk of potential variability in the fair value of fixed rate investments resulting from changes in interest rates (the longer the period for which an interest rate is fixed, the greater the risk). The city's investment policy does not further address the duration of investments. The Minnesota Municipal Money Market Fund (4M Fund) is a common-law trust organized in accordance with the Minnesota Joint Powers Act, which invests only in investment instruments allowable under Minnesota Statutes. It is an external investment pool regulated by Minnesota statutes and the Board of Directors of the League of Minnesota Cities. The 4M Fund is not registered with the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC), but it follows the same regulatory rules of the SEC. The city's investment in the 4M Fund is measured at the net asset value per share provided by the pool, which is based on an amortized cost method that approximates fair value. 40 Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2016 The following schedule provides information on credit and interest rate risks by investment type for the city's investments CITY OF MONTICELLO Percent of Holdings 1.8% 2.9% 7.5% 1.6% 41.1% 8.6% 3.9% 1.4% 5.2% 5.0% 1.2% 19.7% 100.0% 41 Credit Risk Interest Risk — Maturity Duration in Years Fair Value Measurements No Less More Investment Type Rating Agency Using Maturity Than 1 1 to 5 5 to 10 Than 10 Total U.S. agency securities Federal Farm Credit Bank AA+ S&P Level 1 $ $ $ $ 456,696 $ - $ 456,696 Federal Agriculture Mortgage Corporation AA+ S&P Level - 734,667 734,667 Federal Home Loan Bank AA+ S&P Level 1 250,143 807,392 840,397 1,897,932 Federal National Mortgage Association AA+ S&P Level 198,614 195,594 - 394,208 Negotiable certificates of deposit N/R N/A Level 1 4,667,699 4,750,977 937,780 - 10,356,456 Local government securities AAA S&P Level 1 - - - 2,169,285 2,169,285 Local government securities AA+ S&P Level 1 - 568,502 423,472 991,974 Local government securities AA S&P Level 1 357,396 - - 357,396 Local government securities Aaa Moody's Level 1 - - 1,299,582 1,299,582 Local government securities Aa1 Moody's Level 1 140,920 1,108,125 1,249,045 Local government securities A2 Moody's Level 1 299,712 - 299,712 4M Fund N/R N/A Level 1 4,967,335 - - 4,967,335 Total investments $4,967,335 $5,025,095 $5,768,236 $2,838,094 $6,575,528 $25,174,288 N/A — Not Applicable N/R — Not Rated Percent of Holdings 1.8% 2.9% 7.5% 1.6% 41.1% 8.6% 3.9% 1.4% 5.2% 5.0% 1.2% 19.7% 100.0% 41 Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2016 CITY OF MONTICELLO NOTE 3. CAPITAL ASSETS Capital asset activities for the year end December 31, 2016 are as follows: January 1, Transfers and December 31, Beginning Completed Ending Internal Service Governmental Internal Service Governmental Balance Additions Deletions Construction Balance Fund Assets Funds Total Fund Additions Fund Additions Governmental activities Nondepreciable capital assets: Land $ 8,555,369 $ 1,017,795 $ - $ - $ 9,573,164 $ $ 9,573,164 $ $ 1,017,795 Construction in progress 1,264,456 5,096,211 (6,858) (3,077,625) 3,276,184 3,276,184 5,096,211 Total capital assets, not depreciated 9,819,825 6,114,006 (6,858) (3,077,625) 12,849,348 12,849,348 6,114,006 Depreciable capital assets: Buildings and systems 92,636,026 - - 3,077,625 95,713,651 95,713,651 - Machinery and equipment 5,425,323 138,236 (44,566) - 5,518,993 977,868 4,541,125 138,236 Total capital assets, depreciated 98,061,349 138,236 (44,566) 3,077,625 101,232,644 977,868 100,254,776 138,236 Less accumulated depreciation for: Buildings and systems (45,502,235) (3,871,298) - - (49,373,533) - (49,373,533) - (3,871,298) Machinery and equipment (3,881,718) (233,374) 44,566 (4,070,526) (187,080) (3,883,446) (83,907) (149,467) Total accumulated depreciation (49,383,953) (4,104,672) 44,566 (53,444,059) (187,080) (53,256,979) (83,907) (4,020,765) Net capital assets, depreciated 48,677,396 (3,966,436) - 3,077,625 47,788,585 790,788 46,997,797 54,329 (4,020,765) Total governmental activities $58,497,221 $ 2,147,570 $ (6,858) $ - $60,637,933 $ 790,788 $59,847,145 $ 54,329 $ 2,093,241 Business -type activities Nondepreciable capital assets: Land $ 1,197,945 $ - $ $ $ 1,197,945 Construction in progress 1,491,882 2,191,196 3,683,078 Total capital assets, not depreciated 2,689,827 2,191,196 4,881,023 Depreciable capital assets: Buildings and systems 79,100,343 999,404 80,099,747 Machinery and equipment 2,543,832 48,863 (112,419) 2,480,276 Total capital assets, depreciated 81,644,175 1,048,267 (112,419) 82,580,023 Less accumulated depreciation for: Buildings and systems (38,418,330) (1,989,182) - (40,407,512) Machinery and equipment (1,617,631) (118,996) 112,419 (1,624,208) Total accumulated depreciation (40,035,961) (2,108,178) 112,419 (42,031,720) Net capital assets, depreciated 41,608,214 (1,059,911) - 40,548,303 Total business -type activities $44,298,041 $ 1,131,285 $ - $ $45,429,326 42 Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2016 Depreciation for the year ended December 31, 2016 was charged to WWTPDewaterlmprovements function/programs as follows: WWTF Phosphorus Reduction/Digester Governmental activities 2016 Street Reconstruction General government $ 39,365 Public safety 71,520 Public works 3,394,372 Recreation and culture 515,508 Capital assets held by the City's internal service funds — charged to the various functions based on usage of assets 83,907 Total depreciation expense — governmental activities $ 4,104,672 Business -type activities Water $ 502,447 Sewer 1,142,479 Liquor 40,512 Fiber Optics 419,555 Deputy registrar 3,185 Total depreciation expense — business -type activities $ 2,108,178 NOTE 4. COMMITMENTS During fiscal 2016, the city awarded contracts for various construction and remodeling projects. The city's commitments for uncompleted work on these contracts at December 31, 2016 are approximately as follows: Fund Project Description Sewage WWTPDewaterlmprovements Sewage WWTF Phosphorus Reduction/Digester Capital projects 2016 Street Reconstruction Capital projects TH 25/7th St Intersection Improvments Nonmajor 61,037 governmental BCOL Interim Park Improvements NOTE 5. LONG-TERM LIABILITIES A. Description Contract Amount $ 141,975 2,723,671 3,890,673 1,200,588 220,507 200,430 20,078 CITY OF MONTICELLO and net pension liability. • General Obligation Bonds — Three of the four outstanding general obligation bond issues financed street improvement projects and construction at the wastewater treatment plant. The fourth issue financed a settlement with telecommunication revenue bondholders and capital equipment purchases in the Central Equipment Fund. • General Obligation Certificates of Indebtedness — The city issues general obligation certificates of indebtedness to provide financing for capital equipment. Debt service is covered by general property taxes. General obligation certificates of indebtedness are direct obligations that pledge the full faith and credit of the city. • Special Assessment Bonds — These bonds are payable primarily from special assessments levied on the properties benefiting from the improvements funded by these issues. Any deficiencies in revenue to fund these issues will be provided from general property taxes. • General Obligation Revenue Bonds — The outstanding general obligation revenue bonds both financed improvements to the city's sewer system. They will be repaid from revenues pledged and are backed by the taxing power of the city. Net operating revenues were $2,223,252 and principal and interest payments were $547,921 for a percentage of revenues of 24.65%. • PFA Loan — This loan was issued for improvements to the wastewater treatment plant and is payable primarily from user fees which benefit from the improvements. • Compensated Absences — The city provides vacation and sick leave benefits to certain eligible employees. The liability will be repaid by the Benefit Accrual fund or respective enterprise fund for which each employee is employed. $8,177,414 $6,166,982 $2,010,433 Net OPEB Obligation — The city provides post -employment benefits to certain eligible employees through the city's OPEB Plan. The liability will be repaid based on a pay-as-you-go financing requirement as well as any additional amounts determined annually by the city. The liability will be repaid by the General Fund. The city has the following types of long-term liabilities outstanding at December 31, 2016: general obligation (G.O.) bonds and certificates of indebtedness, special assessment improvement bonds, Public Facilities Authority (PFA) loans, compensated absences, net other post -employment benefits (OPEB) obligation, • Net Pension Liability — The city contributes to the Minnesota PERA defined benefit retirement fund per Minnesota state statute. The liability is a reflection of the City's portion of the total net pension liability of the PERA plan based on a percentage of contributions into the plan. 43 Amount Paid Remaining To -Date 12/31/2016 $ 99,383 $ 42,593 2,662,634 61,037 3,204,535 686,138 - 1,200,588 200,430 20,078 CITY OF MONTICELLO and net pension liability. • General Obligation Bonds — Three of the four outstanding general obligation bond issues financed street improvement projects and construction at the wastewater treatment plant. The fourth issue financed a settlement with telecommunication revenue bondholders and capital equipment purchases in the Central Equipment Fund. • General Obligation Certificates of Indebtedness — The city issues general obligation certificates of indebtedness to provide financing for capital equipment. Debt service is covered by general property taxes. General obligation certificates of indebtedness are direct obligations that pledge the full faith and credit of the city. • Special Assessment Bonds — These bonds are payable primarily from special assessments levied on the properties benefiting from the improvements funded by these issues. Any deficiencies in revenue to fund these issues will be provided from general property taxes. • General Obligation Revenue Bonds — The outstanding general obligation revenue bonds both financed improvements to the city's sewer system. They will be repaid from revenues pledged and are backed by the taxing power of the city. Net operating revenues were $2,223,252 and principal and interest payments were $547,921 for a percentage of revenues of 24.65%. • PFA Loan — This loan was issued for improvements to the wastewater treatment plant and is payable primarily from user fees which benefit from the improvements. • Compensated Absences — The city provides vacation and sick leave benefits to certain eligible employees. The liability will be repaid by the Benefit Accrual fund or respective enterprise fund for which each employee is employed. $8,177,414 $6,166,982 $2,010,433 Net OPEB Obligation — The city provides post -employment benefits to certain eligible employees through the city's OPEB Plan. The liability will be repaid based on a pay-as-you-go financing requirement as well as any additional amounts determined annually by the city. The liability will be repaid by the General Fund. The city has the following types of long-term liabilities outstanding at December 31, 2016: general obligation (G.O.) bonds and certificates of indebtedness, special assessment improvement bonds, Public Facilities Authority (PFA) loans, compensated absences, net other post -employment benefits (OPEB) obligation, • Net Pension Liability — The city contributes to the Minnesota PERA defined benefit retirement fund per Minnesota state statute. The liability is a reflection of the City's portion of the total net pension liability of the PERA plan based on a percentage of contributions into the plan. 43 Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2016 CITY OF MONTICELLO Long-term liabilities at year-end are summarized as follows: B. Changes in Long -Term Liabilities Final Original Interest Maturity Balance - Issue Rate % Issue Date Date End of Year January 1, December 31, Due Within Governmental activities 2016 Additions Retirements 2016 One Year General obligation bonds 2008B Sewer revenue Governmental activities refunding bonds $9,270,000 3.00% 04/17/2008 08/01/2018 $ 1,496,000 General obligation bonds $ 9,563,000 $ $(1,877,000) $ 7,686,000 $1,901,000 2014A General obligation bonds: Certificate of indebtedness 325,000 (60,000) 265,000 65,000 judgment portion 6,080,000 1.00-3.50 12/18/2014 12/15/2030 5,730,000 Special assessment bonds 11,689,653 4,900,000 (3,859,653) 12,730,000 2,075,000 equipment portion 515,000 1.00-3.05 12/18/2014 12/15/2024 460,000 Add premiums on bonds 215,931 - (35,633) 180,298 - Less discounts on bonds (25,735) - 4,703 (21,032) - Other general obligation debt Compensated absences 226,158 233,598 (200,094) 259,662 100,613 2013A Certificate Net OPEB obligation 305,563 36,672 (16,191) 326,044 - of indebtedness 500,000 0.35-2.10 04/26/2013 12/01/2020 265,000 Net pension liability Special assessments bonds GERF 1,887,162 2,130,162 (484,366) 3,532,958 2007 Improvement bonds 5,137,903 4.00 12/27/2007 02/01/2018 525,000 2010A General obligation Total governmental activities $24,186,732 $ 7,300,432 $ (6,528,234) $24,958,930 $ 4,141,613 refunding and improvement bonds 3,255,000 0.40-2.70 09/14/2010 02/01/2021 1,420,000 Business -type activities 2011A General obligation General obligation refunding bonds 10,735,000 2.00-3.00 10/19/2011 02/01/2023 3,425,000 revenue bonds $ 2,930,347 $ - $ (470,347) $ 2,460,000 $ 180,000 2015B General PFA loans 615,268 1,413,065 (100,483) 1,927,850 109,000 obligation bonds 2,605,000 1.50-3.00 11/05/2015 12/15/2030 2,460,000 Add premiums on bonds 31,213 - (3,859) 27,354 - 2016A General Less discounts on bonds (874) - 874 - - obligation bonds 4,900,000 2.00-3.00 11/21/2016 12/15/2030 4,900,000 Compensated absences 77,919 86,771 (72,317) 92,373 42,183 Net premiums Net pension liability (discounts) on bonds 159,266 GERF 1,108,334 632,663 (499,687) 1,241,310 - Compensated absences payable 259,662 Total business -type activities $ 4,762,207 $2,132,499 $ (1,145,819) $ 5,748,887 $ 331,183 Net OPEB obligation 326,044 Net pension liability 3,532,958 Total governmental activities $24,958,930 Business -type activities General obligation revenue bonds 2013B Wastewater treatment bonds 3,000,000 2.00 - 3.35 12/05/2013 12/01/2028 $ 2,460,000 Public Facility Authority loan (2015A) 2,391,483 1.06 09/23/2015 08/20/2035 1,927,850 Net premiums (discounts) on bonds 27,354 Compensated absences payable 92,373 Net pension liability 1,241,310 Total business -type activities $ 5,748,887 44 Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2016 C. Minimum Debt Payments Minimum annual principal and interest payments to maturity for bonds payable are as follows CITY OF MONTICELLO Business -Type Activities General Obligation Bonds PFA Loan Principal Governmental Activities Principal Interest $ 180,000 $ 63,398 $ 109,000 General Obligation Special 59,798 Year Ending General Obligation Bonds Certificate of Indebtedness Assessment Bonds December 31, Principal Interest Principal Interest Principal Interest 2017 $ 1,901,000 $ 197,253 $ 65,000 $ 4,590 $ 2,075,000 $ 280,088 2018 410,000 166,759 65,000 3,713 1,590,000 231,074 2019 415,000 160,609 65,000 2,673 1,265,000 203,005 2020 420,000 152,931 70,000 1,470 1,290,000 177,303 2021 435,000 143,691 - - 1,320,000 148,475 2022-2026 2,220,000 533,741 3,460,000 349,475 2027-2031 1,885,000 166,938 1,730,000 124,925 2032-2035 - - - - CITY OF MONTICELLO Business -Type Activities General Obligation Bonds PFA Loan Principal Interest Principal Interest $ 180,000 $ 63,398 $ 109,000 $ 12,177 185,000 59,798 111,000 23,195 185,000 56,098 112,000 22,015 190,000 52,398 113,000 20,824 195,000 48,598 114,000 19,623 1,055,000 169,235 589,000 79,661 470,000 23,440 622,000 47,665 - - 157,850 13,915 $ 7,686,000 $1,521,922 $ 265,000 $ 12,446 $ 12,730,000 $1,514,345 $2,460,000 $ 472,963 $1,927,850 $ 239,074 D. Conduit Debt F. Abatements The city has issued Senior Housing Refunding Revenue Bonds to provide financial The City currently has four agreements that would be considered tax assistance to private sector entities for the acquisition and construction of senior abatements under GASB Statement 77: housing facilities deemed to be in the public interest. The bonds are secured by the property financed and are payable solely from payments received on the underlying mortgage loans. Upon repayment of the bonds, ownership of the acquired facilities transfers to the private sector entity served by the bond issuance. The City is not obligated in any manner for repayment of the bonds. Accordingly, the bonds are not reported as liabilities in the accompanying financial statements. As of December 31, 2016, there was one series of Senior Housing Refunding Revenue Bonds outstanding. The original issue amounts totaled $3,000,000 with an interest rate of 4.75 percent. This balance has been reduced through annual payments and partial call prepayments. The outstanding balance as of December 31, 2016 is undetermined. E. Pay -As -You -Go Tax Increment Note The City, in order to spur economic development and redevelopment has entered into private development and redevelopment agreements to encourage developers to construct, expand, or improve new or existing properties and buildings or clean-up and redevelop blighted areas. These agreements may in substance be a tax abatement but will depend on their individual circumstances. Name Purpose 1-20 Outstanding Prairie 22 twinhome and 8 fourplex West Townhouse housing units 1-22 Redevelopment activities in Downtown 1997 Downtown and 2010 District Embracing Downtown plans 1-24 St. 60 unit elderly (senior Benedicts citizen) housing facility 1-29 Front Porch 27 townhouse housing units; Assoc owner -occupied Amount of taxes Outstanding abated principal Date of during the balance at required fiscal year year end decertification $ 6,333 $ 77,890 12/31/2024 $ 48,751 $ 684,816 12/31/2024 $ 20,520 $ - 12/31/2026 $ 16,969 $ 164,650 12/31/2029 45 Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2016 The City is authorized to create a tax increment financing plan under Minnesota Statute 469.175. The criteria that must be met under the statute are that, in the opinion of the municipality: • the proposed development or redevelopment would not reasonably be expected to occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future; and • the increased market value of the site that could reasonably be expected to occur without the use of tax increment financing would be less than the increase in the market value estimated to result from the proposed development after subtracting the present value of the projected tax increments for the maximum duration of the district permitted by the plan. The requirements of this item do not apply if the district is a housing district; • that the tax increment financing plan conforms to the general plan for the development or redevelopment of the municipality as a whole; and • that the tax increment financing plan will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the municipality as a whole, for the development or redevelopment of the project by private enterprise. The city has development agreements with private developers for a property in the city's tax increment districts. As part of the agreements, the city has agreed to reimburse the developers for certain costs through pay-as-you-go tax increment notes. These notes provide for the payment of principal equal to the developers' costs, plus interest at rates ranging from 5.0 percent to 8.5 percent (interest accrual commencing upon the developer completing the project). Payments of the notes will be made at the lesser of the scheduled note payments or the actual net tax increment received during the period specified in the agreement. The note will be canceled at the end of the agreement term, whether it has been fully repaid or not. The outstanding principal balances as of December 31, 2016 are listed in the previous table. These notes are not included in the city's long-term debt, because repayment is required only to the extent sufficient tax increments are received. The city's position is that this is an obligation to assign future and uncertain revenue sources and is not actual debt in substance. G. Arbitrage Rebate In accordance with the provisions of Section 148(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, bonds must satisfy certain arbitrage rebate requirements. Positive arbitrage is the excess of (1) the amount earned on investments purchased with bond proceeds over (2) the amount that such investments would CITY OF MONTICELLO have earned had such investments been invested at a rate equal to the yield on the bond issue. In order to comply with the arbitrage rebates requirements, positive arbitrage must be paid to the U.S. treasury at the end of each five-year anniversary date of the bond issue. As of December 31, 2016, there are no amounts of arbitrage rebates. H. Revenue Pledged Future revenue pledged for the payment of long-term debt is as follows: 2013B G.O. Wastewater Description Treatment Bonds PFA Loan Use of proceeds Sewage Fund Sewage Fund Revenue pledged Type Utilitycharges Utilitycharges Percent of total debt service 57% 43% Term of pledge 2013-2028 2013-2025 Remaining principal & interest $ 2,932,963 $ 2,166,924 Current year Principal and interest paid $ 246,998 $ 100,483 Pledged revenue received $ 1,260,306 $ 935,004 NOTE 6. DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLANS — STATE-WIDE A. Plan Description The city participates in the General Employees Retirement Fund (GERF) cost- sharing multiple -employer defined benefit pension plan administered by the Public Employees Retirement Association of Minnesota (PERA). PERA's defined benefit pension plans are established and administered in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Chapters 353 and 356. PERA's defined benefit pension plans are tax qualified plans under Section 401 (a) of the Internal Revenue Code. General Emolovees Retirement Fund (GERF) All full-time and certain part-time employees of the city are covered by the General Employees Retirement Fund (GERF). GERF members belong to either the Coordinated Plan or the Basic Plan. Coordinated Plan members are covered by Social Security and Basic Plan members are not. The Basic Plan was closed to new members in 1967. All new members must participate in the Coordinated Plan. 46 Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2016 B. Benefits Provided PERA provides retirement, disability, and death benefits. Benefit provisions are established by state statute and can only be modified by the state legislature. Benefit increases are provided to benefit recipients each January. Increases are related to the funding ratio of the plan. Members in plans that are at least 90% funded for two consecutive years are given 2.5% increases. Members in plans that have not exceeded 90% funded, or have fallen below 80%, are given 1% increases. The benefit provisions stated in the following paragraph of this section are current provisions and apply to active plan participants. Vested, terminated employees who are entitled to benefits but are not receiving them yet are bound by the provisions in effect at the time they last terminated their public service. GERF Benefits Benefits are based on a member's highest average salary for any five successive years of allowable service, age, and years of credit at termination of service. Two methods are used to compute benefits for PERA's Coordinated and Basic Plan members. The retiring member receives the higher of a step -rate benefit accrual formula (Method 1) or a level accrual formula (Method 2). Under Method 1, the annuity accrual rate for a Basic Plan member is 2.2% of average salary for each of the first ten years of service and 2.7% for each remaining year. The annuity accrual rate for a Coordinated Plan member is 1.2% of average salary for each of the first ten years and 1.7% for each remaining year. Under Method 2, the annuity accrual rate is 2.7% of average salary for Basic Plan members and 1.7% for Coordinated Plan members for each year of service. For members hired prior to July 1, 1989, a full annuity is available when age plus years of service equal 90 and normal retirement age is 65. For members hired on or after July 1, 1989, normal retirement age is the age for unreduced Social Security benefits capped at 66. C. Contributions Minnesota Statutes Chapter 353 sets the rates for employer and employee contributions. Contribution rates can only be modified by the state legislature. GERF Contributions Basic Plan and Coordinated Plan members were required to contribute 9.1% and 6.50%, respectively, of their annual covered salary in calendar year 2016.The city was required to contribute 11.78% of pay for Basic Plan members and 7.50% for Coordinated Plan members in calendar year 2016. The city's contributions to the GERF for the year ended December 31, 2016, were $267,516. The city's contributions were equal to the required contributions as set by state statute. CITY OF MONTICELLO D. Pension Costs GERF Pension Costs At December 31, 2016, the city reported a liability of $4,774,268 for its proportionate share of the GERF's net pension liability. The city's net pension liability reflected a reduction due to the State of Minnesota's contribution of $6 million to the fund in 2016. The State of Minnesota is considered a non - employer contributing entity and the state's contribution meets the definition of a special funding situation. The State of Minnesota's proportionate share of the net pension liability associated with the city totaled $62,387. The net pension liability was measured as of June 30, 2016, and the total pension liability used to calculate the net pension liability was determined by an actuarial valuation as of that date. The city's proportion of the net pension liability was based on the city's contributions received by PERA during the measurement period for employer payroll paid dates from July 1, 2015, through June 30, 2016, relative to the total employer contributions received from all of PERA's participating employers. At June 30, 2016, the city's proportion share was 0.0588% which was an increase of 0.0010% from its proportion measured as of June 30, 2015. For the year ended December 31, 2016, the city recognized pension expense of $293,219 for its proportionate share of the GERF's pension expense. In addition, the city recognized an additional $18,602 as pension expense (and grant revenue) for its proportionate share of the State of Minnesota's contribution of $6 million to the General Employees Fund. At December 31, 2016, the city reported its proportionate share of the GERF's deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources related to pensions from the following sources: Deferred Outflows Deferred Inflows 47 of Resources of Resources Differences between expected and actual economic experience $ - $ 386,097 Changes in actuarial assumptions 1,035,342 - Difference between projected and actual investment earnings 814,208 290,719 Changes in proportion 38,869 105,694 Contributions paid to PERAsubsequent to the measurement date 130,590 - Total $ 2,019,009 $ 782,510 47 Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2016 $130,590 reported as deferred outflows of resources related to pensions resulting from contributions paid to PERA subsequent to the measurement date will be recognized as a reduction of the net pension liability in the year ended December 31, 2017. Other amounts reported as deferred outflows and inflows of resources related to pensions will be recognized in pension expense as follows: $ 1,105,909 E. Actuarial Assumptions The total pension liability in the June 30, 2016, actuarial valuation was determined using the following actuarial assumptions: Inflation 2.50% per year Active Member Payroll Growth 3.25% per year Investment Rate of Return 7.50% Salary increases were based on a service -related table. Mortality rates for active members, retirees, survivors and disabilitants were based on RP 2014 tables for males or females, as appropriate, with slight adjustments. Cost of living benefit increases for retirees are assumed to be 1 % per year for all future years. Actuarial assumptions used in the June 30, 2016, valuation were based on the results of actuarial experience studies. The most recent four-year experience study in the GERF was completed in 2015. The following changes in actuarial assumptions occurred in 2016: • The assumed post-retirement benefit increase rate was changed from 1.0% per year through 2035 and 2.5% per year thereafter to 1.0% per year for all future years. • The assumed investment return was changed from 7.9% to 7.5%. The single discount rate was changed from 7.9% to 7.5%. CITY OF MONTICELLO • Other assumptions were changed pursuant to the experience study dated June 30, 2015. The assumed future salary increases, payroll growth, and inflation were decreased by 0.25% to 3.25% for payroll growth and 2.50% for inflation. The State Board of Investment, which manages the investments of PERA, prepares an analysis of the reasonableness on a regular basis of the long-term expected rate of return on a regular basis using a building-block method in which best -estimate ranges of expected future rates of return are developed for each major asset class. These ranges are combined to produce an expected long- term rate of return by weighting the expected future rates of return by the target asset allocation percentages. The target allocation and best estimates of arithmetic real rates of return for each major asset class are summarized in the following table: Long -Term Target Expected Real Asset Class Allocation Rate of Return Domestic Stocks Pension Yearended Expense December 31, Amount 2017 $ 288,092 2018 172,585 2019 472,768 2020 172,464 $ 1,105,909 E. Actuarial Assumptions The total pension liability in the June 30, 2016, actuarial valuation was determined using the following actuarial assumptions: Inflation 2.50% per year Active Member Payroll Growth 3.25% per year Investment Rate of Return 7.50% Salary increases were based on a service -related table. Mortality rates for active members, retirees, survivors and disabilitants were based on RP 2014 tables for males or females, as appropriate, with slight adjustments. Cost of living benefit increases for retirees are assumed to be 1 % per year for all future years. Actuarial assumptions used in the June 30, 2016, valuation were based on the results of actuarial experience studies. The most recent four-year experience study in the GERF was completed in 2015. The following changes in actuarial assumptions occurred in 2016: • The assumed post-retirement benefit increase rate was changed from 1.0% per year through 2035 and 2.5% per year thereafter to 1.0% per year for all future years. • The assumed investment return was changed from 7.9% to 7.5%. The single discount rate was changed from 7.9% to 7.5%. CITY OF MONTICELLO • Other assumptions were changed pursuant to the experience study dated June 30, 2015. The assumed future salary increases, payroll growth, and inflation were decreased by 0.25% to 3.25% for payroll growth and 2.50% for inflation. The State Board of Investment, which manages the investments of PERA, prepares an analysis of the reasonableness on a regular basis of the long-term expected rate of return on a regular basis using a building-block method in which best -estimate ranges of expected future rates of return are developed for each major asset class. These ranges are combined to produce an expected long- term rate of return by weighting the expected future rates of return by the target asset allocation percentages. The target allocation and best estimates of arithmetic real rates of return for each major asset class are summarized in the following table: Long -Term Target Expected Real Asset Class Allocation Rate of Return Domestic Stocks 45% 5.50% International Stocks 15% 6.00% Bonds 18% 1.45% Alternative Assets 20% 6.40% Cash 2% 0.50% Total 100% F. Discount Rate The discount rate used to measure the total pension liability was 7.5%, a reduction from the 7.9% used in 2015. The projection of cash flows used to determine the discount rate assumed that employee and employer contributions will be made at the rates set in Minnesota statute. Based on these assumptions, the fiduciary net position of the GERF was projected to be available to make all projected future benefit payments of current plan members. Therefore, the long- term expected rate of return on pension plan investments was applied to all periods of projected benefit payments to determine the total pension liability. G. Pension Liability Sensitivity The following presents the city's proportionate share of the net pension liability calculated using the discount rate disclosed in the preceding paragraph, as well 48 Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2016 as what the city's proportionate share of the net pension liability would be if it were calculated using a discount rate 1 percentage point lower or 1 percentage point higher than the current discount rate: 1 % Decrease 1% Increase In Discount Discount In Discount Rate (6.50%) Rate (7.50%) Rate (8.50%) Citys proportionate share of the GERF net pension liability $ 6,780,876 $ 4,774,268 $ 3,121,370 H. Pension Plan Fiduciary Net Position Detailed information about the GERF pension plan's fiduciary net position is available in a separately -issued PERA financial report that includes financial statements and required supplementary information. That report may be obtained on the Internet at www.mnpera.org. NOTE 7. DEFINED CONTRIBUTION PENSION PLANS — STATE-WIDE Three Council members of the city are covered by the Public Employees Defined Contribution Plan (PEDCP), a multiple -employer deferred compensation plan administered by PERA. The PEDCP is a tax qualified plan under Section 401(a) of the Internal Revenue Code and all contributions by or on behalf of employees are tax deferred until time of withdrawal. Plan benefits depend solely on amounts contributed to the plan plus investment earnings, less administrative expenses. Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 353D.03, specifies plan provisions, including the employee and employer contribution rates for those qualified personnel who elect to participate. An eligible elected official who decides to participate contributes 5% of salary which is matched by the elected official's employer. Employer and employee contributions are combined and used to purchase shares in one or more of the seven accounts of the Minnesota Supplemental Investment Fund. For administering the plan, PERA receives 2% of employer contributions and twenty-five hundredths of 1 percent (0.0025) of the assets in each member's account annually. Total contributions made by the city during fiscal year 2016 were: Contribution Amount % of Covered Payroll Required Employee Employer Employee Employer Rate $ 1,140 $ 1,140 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% CITY OF MONTICELLO NOTE 8. DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLAN - MONTICELLO FIRE RELIEF ASSOCIATION A. Plan Description All members of the Monticello Fire Department (the Department) are covered by a defined benefit contribution plan administered by the Monticello Fire Relief Association (the Association). As of December 31, 2016, the plan covered 29 active firefighters and 3 retirees and beneficiaries. The plan is a single -employer retirement plan that is established and administered in accordance with Minnesota statute, chapter 69. The Association maintains a separate Special fund to accumulate assets to fund the retirement benefits earned by the Department's membership. Funding for the Association is derived from contributions from the city and 2% fire aid from the State of Minnesota. Funds are also derived from investment income. B. Benefits Provided Upon approval by the Board of Trustees, lump sum retirement benefits are either paid or deferred as follows: Each member who is at least 50 years of age, has retired from the fire department, has served at least 10 years of active service with such department before retirement and has been a member of the Association in good standing at least 10 years prior to such retirement, shall be entitled to a lump sum service pension in the amount of $3,600 for each year of service but not exceeding the maximum amount per year of service allowed by law for the minimum average amount of available financing per firefighter as prescribed by laws. A year of service may be prorated to twelve monthly slices, if a full year of active service is not reached. If a member of the Association shall become permanently or totally disabled, the Association shall pay the sum of $3,600 for each year the member was an active member of the Association. If a member who received a disability pension subsequently recovers and returns to active duty, the disability pension is deducted from the service pension as approved by the Board of Trustees. According to the bylaws of the Association and pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, members who retire with less than 20 years of service and have reached the age of 50 years and have completed at least 10 years of active membership are entitled to a reduced service pension not to exceed the amount calculated by multiplying the member's service pension for the completed years of service times an applicable nonforfeitable percentage. 49 Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2016 During the time a member is on deferred vested pension (not yet reached age 50), they will earn interest on the deferred benefit amount at a rate equal to the actual time weighted total rate of return as reported by the Minnesota State Auditor's Office, up to five percent, compounded annually. A deferred vested member will not be eligible for disability benefits. C. Contributions Minnesota statutes, chapters 424 and 424A authorize pension benefits for volunteer fire relief associations. Contributions by the city are determined as follows: • Normal cost for next year (increase in pension benefit obligation) • Plus estimated expenses for next year and 10 percent of any deficits • Less anticipated income next year and 10 percent of any surplus The plan is funded by fire state aid, investment earnings and, if necessary, employer contributions as specified in Minnesota statutes and voluntary City contributions (if applicable). The State of Minnesota contributed $123,656 in fire state aid to the plan on behalf of the City Fire Department for the year ended December 31, 2016, which was recorded as a revenue. Required employer contributions are calculated annually based on statutory provisions. The City's statutorily -required contributions to the plan for the year ended December 31, 2016 were $123,656. The City's contributions were equal to the required contributions as set by state statute. The City made no voluntary contributions to the plan. Furthermore, the firefighter has no obligation to contribute to the plan. D. Pension Costs At December 31, 2016, the city reported a net pension asset of $23,180 for the FRA plan. The total pension liability used to calculate the net pension asset in accordance with GASB 68 was determined by Robinson Associates LLC applying an actuarial formula to specific census data certified by the fire department as of December 31, 2016. For the year ended December 31, 2016, the Fire Department recognized pension expense of $179,441. CITY OF MONTICELLO At December 31, 2016, the fire department reported deferred outflows/inflows of resources: Deferred Deferred Outflows Inflows of Resources of Resources Differences between expected and 6,029 actual economic experience $ - $ 49,068 Net difference between projected (6,180) and actual investment earnings $ 28,267 $ - $ 28,267 $ 49,068 Amounts reported as deferred outflows and inflows of resources related to pensions will be recognized in pension expense as follows: Pension Year ended Expense December 31, Amount 2017 $ 6,029 2018 6,029 2019 6,033 2020 (6,180) 2021 (4,089) Thereafter (28,623) $ (20, 801) E. Actuarial Assumptions The total pension liability at December 31, 2016, was determined using the entry age normal actuarial cost method and the following assumptions: Retirement eligibility at 100 percent service pension at age 50 and 20 years of service, early vested retirement at age 50 with 10 years of service vested at 60 percent and increased by 4 percent for each additional year of service up to 20 and eligibility for deferred service pension payable at age 50 and 20 years of service. 50 Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2016 CITY OF MONTICELLO Salary Increases 2.00% per year G. Changes in the Net Pension Liability Cost of living increases 2.00% per year Investment rate of return 4.19% Total Plan Net Pension Pension Fiduciary Liability 20 year municipal bond yield 3.57% Liability (TPL) Net Position (Asset) (a) (b) (a -b) There were no changes in actuarial assumptions in 2016. Beginning balance 12/31/15 $ 1,017,135 $ 1,026,460 $ (9,325) The 4.19 percent long-term expected rate of return on pension plan investments was determined using a building-block method in which best estimates for changes for the year expected future real rates of return (expected returns, net of inflation) were Interest cost 79,730 79,730 developed for each asset class using the plan's target investment allocation Interest total pension liability 44,225 44,225 along with long-term return expectations by asset class. Inflation expectations Change inn TPL due to changes in were applied to derive the nominal rate of return for the portfolio. benefit terms 90,761 90,761 Differences between actual and expected experience in measurement of TPL (53,157) - (53,157) The target allocation and best estimates of arithmetic real rates of return for each Contributions from employer 123,656 (123,656) major asset class are summarized in the following table: Supplemental benefits reimbursed - Net investment income 55,902 (55,902) Long-term Benefit payments (1,168) (1,168) - Target Expected Real Administrative expenses - (4,144) 4,144 Asset Class Allocation Rate of Return Ending balance 12/31/16 $ 1,177,526 $ 1,200,706 $ (23,180) Cash 6.5% -0.7% Mutual funds 93.5% 3.8% H. Pension Asset Sensitivity The following presents the city's net pension (liability) asset for the FRA plan, 100.0% calculated using the discount rate disclosed in the preceding paragraph, as well as what the city's net pension (liability) asset would be if it were calculated using F. Discount Rate a discount rate 1 percent lower or 1 percent higher than the current discount rate: The discount rate used to measure the total pension liability was 4.19 percent. The projection of cash flows used to determine the discount rate assumed that 1% Decrease 1% Increase contributions to the FRA plan will be made as specified in statute. Based on that In Discount Discount In Discount assumption and considering the funding ratio of the plan, the fiduciary net position Rate (3.19%) Rate (4.19%) Rate (5.19%) was projected to be available to make all projected future benefit payments of Net Pension current active and inactive members. Therefore, the long-term expected rate of return on pension plan investments was applied to all periods of projected benefit Asset (Liability) $ (10,355) $ 23,180 $ 55,183 payments to determine the total pension liability. I. Pension Plan Fiduciary Net Position The Association issues a publicly available financial report that includes financial statements and required supplementary information. A copy of the report may be obtained at Monticello City Hall. 51 Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2016 NOTE 9. OTHER POST -EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS (OPEB) PLAN A. Plan Description The city provides post -employment insurance benefits to certain eligible employees through the city's OPEB Plan, a single -employer defined benefit plan administered by the city. All post -employment benefits are based on contractual agreements with employee groups. The Retiree Health Plan does not issue a publicly available financial report. These contractual agreements do not include any specific contribution or funding requirements. These benefits are summarized as follows: Post -Employment Insurance Benefits — All retirees of the city have the option under state law to continue their medical insurance coverage through the city from the time of retirement until the employee reaches the age of eligibility for Medicare. For members of all employee groups, the retiree must pay the full premium to continue coverage for medical and dental insurance. The city is legally required to include any retirees for whom it provides health insurance coverage in the same insurance pool as its active employees, whether the premiums are paid by the city or the retiree. Consequently, participating retirees are considered to receive a secondary benefit known as an "implicit rate subsidy." This benefit relates to the assumption that the retiree is receiving a more favorable premium rate than they would otherwise be able to obtain if purchasing insurance on their own, due to being included in the same pool with the city's younger and statistically healthier active employees. B. Funding Policy The required contribution is based on projected pay-as-you-go financing requirements, with additional amounts to pre -fund benefits as determined annually by the city. C. Annual OPEB Cost and Net OPEB Obligation The city's annual OPEB cost (expense) is calculated based on the ARC of the city, an amount determined on an actuarially determined basis in accordance with the parameters of GASB Statement Nos. 43 and 45. The ARC represents a level funding that, if paid on an ongoing basis, is projected to cover normal costs each year and amortize any unfunded actuarial liabilities (or funding excess) over a period not to exceed 30 years. The following table shows the components of the city's annual OPEB cost for the year, the amount actually contributed to the plan, and the changes in the city's net OPEB obligation to the plan: CITY OF MONTICELLO ARC $ 42,120 Interest on net OPEB obligation 12,223 Adjustment to ARC (17,671) Annual OPEB cost (expense) 36,672 Less contribution made 16,191 Increase in net OPEB obligation 20,481 Net OPEB obligation — beginning of year 305,563 Net OPEB obligation — end of year $ 326,044 The city's annual OPEB cost, the percentage of annual OPEB cost contributed to the plan, and the net OPEB obligation for the last three years are as follows: Fiscal Year Beginning Annual Percentage Beginning OPEB OPEB Employer of AnnualOPEB Net OPEB January 1, Obligation Cost Contribution Cost Contributed Obligation 2014 $ 255,604 $ 34,718 $ 6,761 19.5% $ 283,561 2015 283,561 35,817 13,815 38.6% 305,563 2016 305,563 36,672 16,191 44.2% 326,044 D. Funded Status and Funding Progress As of January 1, 2014, the most recent actuarial valuation date, the plan was zero percent funded. The actuarial accrued liability for benefits was $265,486 and the actuarial value of assets was $0, resulting in an unfunded actuarial accrued liability (UAAL) of $265,486. The covered payroll (annual payroll of active employees covered by the plan) was $3,914,601, and the ratio of the UAAL to the covered payroll was 6.78 percent. Actuarial valuations of an ongoing plan involve estimates of the value of reported amounts and assumptions about the probability occurrence of events far into the future. Examples include assumptions about future employment, mortality, and the healthcare cost trend. Amounts determined regarding the funded status of the plan and ARC of the employer are subject to continual revision as actual results are compared with past expectations and new estimates are made about the future. The Schedule of Funding Progress immediately following the notes to basic financial statements presents multi-year trend information about whether the actuarial value of plan assets is increasing or decreasing over time relative to the actuarial accrued liabilities for benefits. The city's net OPEB obligation is typically liquidated using the General fund. 52 Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2016 E. Actuarial Methods and Assumptions Projections of benefits for financial reporting purposes are based on the substantive plan (the plan as understood by the employer and the plan members) and include the types of benefits provided at the time of each valuation and the historical pattern of sharing of benefit costs between the employer and plan members to that point. The actuarial methods and assumptions used include techniques that are designed to reduce the effects of short-term volatility in actuarial accrued liabilities and the actuarial value of assets, consistent with the long-term perspective of the calculations. In the January 1, 2014 actuarial valuation, the projected unit credit actuarial cost method was used. The actuarial assumptions included: a 4.0 percent investment rate of return (net of administrative expenses) based on the city's own investments; an annual healthcare cost trend rate of 10.0 percent initially, reduced by decrements to an ultimate rate of 5.0 percent after 10 years for medical insurance. The assumptions used did not include OPEB inflation increases. The city has chosen to amortize the entire UAAL as a level dollar amount over a 30 year open period. This method will re -amortize the UAAL each year over 30 years. Absent actuarial gains, the UAAL will never be fully recognized under this method. NOTE 10. RISK MANAGEMENT AND LITIGATION The city is exposed to various risks of losses related to torts; theft of, damage to, and destruction of assets; errors and omissions; injuries to employees; and natural disasters. For the past several years, the city has obtained insurance coverage from various trusts administered by the League of Minnesota Cities. Additionally, the city has effectively managed risk through various employee education and prevention programs. All risk management activities are accounted for in the appropriate fund. Expenditures and claims are recognized when it is probable that a loss has occurred, the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated, and the loss amount exceeds insurance coverage. In determining claims, events that might create claims, but for which none have been reported, are considered. The city attorney estimates that the amount of actual or potential claims against the city as of December 31, 2016 will not materially affect the financial condition of the city. Workers compensation coverage is provided through the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust (LMCIT). This is a group self-insured workers' compensation plan. Nearly every municipality in Minnesota participates in the plan. The city has never had to contribute any additional funds beyond the annual CITY OF MONTICELLO standard premium and deductibles, which is $2,500 per occurrence. The city's annual premium reflects a base rate multiplied by an experience modification of 69%. The city provides health benefit coverage to all full-time employees and certain part-time employees who meet personnel policy set criteria. The city pays a portion of the premium, which is set annually by council action, and is not obligated to make any other payments. The city also purchases property, vehicle, liability and various other insurance coverages from the LMCIT. The standard deductible for most claims is $1,000. State statute sets tort limits for most liability claims at $500,000 per individual and $1,500,000 for all claimants for one incident. Annually, the council can waive the tort limits, but has chosen not to without exception. The city periodically receives a dividend from LMCIT and has never had to contribute additional funds beyond premiums and deductibles. There were no significant reductions in insurance coverages from the previous year and there were no settlements in excess of insurance coverage in each of the past three years. NOTE 11. CLAIMS AND JUDGMENTS The city participates in a number of federal and state programs that are fully or partially funded by grants received from other governmental units. Expenditures financed by grants are subject to audit by the appropriate grantor government. If expenditures are disallowed due to noncompliance with grant program regulations, the city may be required to reimburse the grantor government. As of December 31, 2016, significant amounts of grant expenditures have not been audited by the granting agency, but the city believes that disallowed expenditures discovered in subsequent audits, if any, will not have a material effect on any of the individual funds or the overall financial position of the city. NOTE 12. SPECIAL ITEM — TRANSFER OF OPERATIONS During 2016, the city contracted management of FiberNet Monticello to Arvig Enterprises. As part of this transfer, employees of FiberNet Monticello became employees of Arvig Enterprises. The positive impact of this transfer of operations on the city's long-term liabilities has been reported as a special item in the city's Statement of Activities and the proprietary funds' Statement of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Net Position. 53 Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2016 NOTE 13. FUND BALANCES Classifications At December 31, 2016, a summary of the city's governmental fund balance classifications are as follows CITY OF MONTICELLO 54 Special Revenue Funds Economic Debt General Community Development Service Capital Nonmajor Fund Center Authority Fund Projects Funds Total Nonspendable Prepaid items $ 134,245 $ 24,907 $ 1,638 $ - $ - $ 1,239 $ 162,029 Land held for resale - - 2,030,757 - 1,631,789 - 3,662,546 Total nonspendable 134,245 24,907 2,032,395 - 1,631,789 1,239 3,824,575 Restricted Debt service - - - 3,543,551 - - 3,543,551 Economic development - - 1,413,910 - - 1,138,527 2,552,437 Perpetual care - - - - - 30,489 30,489 Tax increment - - 860,757 - - - 860,757 Total restricted - - 2,274,667 3,543,551 - 1,169,016 6,987,234 Assigned Capital improvements - - - - 5,252,440 4,496,088 9,748,528 Economic development - - 2,835,268 - - - 2,835,268 Community center operations - 736,922 - - - - 736,922 Total assigned - 736,922 2,835,268 - 5,252,440 4,496,088 13,320,718 Unassigned 6,142,475 - - - - - 6,142,475 Total $ 6,276,720 $ 761,829 $ 7,142,330 $ 3,543,551 $ 6,884,229 $ 5,666,343 $ 30,275,002 54 Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2016 NOTE 14. INTERFUND TRANSFERS Interfund transfers for the year ended December 31, 2016 consisted of the following: Governmental funds: Economic Development Authority Debt Service Capital Projects Nonmajor governmental Total governmental funds Enterprise funds: Water Sewage Liquor Fiber Optics Total enterprise funds Total Transfers In Transfers Out 1,439,136 753,500 2,192,636 350,000 350,000 $ 2,542,636 The following schedule reflects each fund transfer $ 188,500 753,500 281,175 1,223,175 199,327 770,134 350,000 1,319,461 $ 2,542,636 Transfers In Transfers Out Amount Debt Service Economic Development Authority 188,500 (1) Water 199,327 (1) Sewage 770,134 (1) Nonmajor governmental 281,175 (1) Nonmajor governmental Capital Projects 753,500 (2) Fiber Optics Liquor 350,000 (3) Total $2,542,636 (1) Transfer for principal and interest payments on various debt issues. (2) Transfer for land acquisition and park development. (3) Transfer to subsidize fund operating and capital expenditures. CITY OF MONTICELLO NOTE 15. CONCENTRATION OF REVENUES Cargill Kitchen solutions is the largest customer of water and sewage services. The company's water purchases account for $78,763, or 6.7 percent, of Water Fund operating revenue; and the company's sewage charges account for $410,130, or 18.4 percent, of Sewage Fund operating revenue. Additionally, Northern States Power Company's (Xcel Energy) net tax capacity for property taxes payable in 2016 is $15,913,229, or 59.9 percent, of the total net capacity of $26,581,226. Accordingly, Xcel Energy's share of the $9.205 million city property tax levy is $5.65 million. The tax capacity on January 1, 2017, is based on market values certified to the state on January 1, 2016. In both 2013 and 2014, Xcel Energy uprated energy producing assets at its Monticello nuclear plant, increasing the company's net tax capacity to $16,970,092, or 60 percent, of the $28,307,628 total tax capacity for taxes payable in 2017. NOTE 16. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS In 2016, the city council approved the early pay off of the remaining $1,006,000 2008B Sewer Revenue Refunding Bonds on February 1, 2017. These bonds had original maturity dates of August 1, 2017 and February 1, 2018. Existing reserves in the debt service fund were used to prepay the bonds. On February 14, 2017, the city purchased 5.701 acres of land from St. Henry's Catholic Church for $969,941 to be used as part of the Fallon Overpass Bridge project. The construction phase of the project is estimated for 2018. ionii� ello 55 IZCITY OF MMontic110 (This page left blank intentionally) 56 j v�-�-. r•. r . _ — _y _ �� Adow- - .mss•=. ..� ��'_�� - _ _ter Azi - IRE SUPP ENRY INE RMA - - CITY OF MONTICELLO Required Supplementary Information Schedules of Employer's Share and Non -Employer Proportionate Share of Net Pension Liability Last Ten Fiscal Years Public Employees Retirement Association - General Employees Retirement Fund Employer's Proportionate Share (Amount) of the Net Pension Liability (Asset) (a) ($9,325) (23,180) Employer's Covered Payroll' (b) N/A N/A Employer's Proportionate Share of the Net Pension Liability as a Percentage of its Covered Payroll (a/b) N/A N/A Plan Fiduciary Net Position as a Percentage of the Total Pension Liability 100.9% 102.0% Note 1: Changes in Plan Provisions. On January 1, 2015, the Minneapolis Employees Retirement Fund was merged into the GERF, which increased the total pension liability by $1.1 billsion and increased the fiduciary plan net position by $892 million. Upon consolidation, state and employer contributions were revised. Note 2: Changes in Actuarial Assumptions. (1) 2015 Changes - The assumed post-retirement benefit increse rate was changed from 1.00 percent per year through 2030 and 2.50 percent per year thereafter to 1.00 percent per year through 2035 and 2.50 percent per year thereafter. (2) 2016 Changes - The assumed post-retirement benefit increase rate was changed from 1.00 percent per year through 2035 and 2.5 percent per year thereafter to 1.00 percent per year for all future years. The assumed investment return and the single discount rate were both changed from 7.90 percent to 7.50 percent. Other assumptions were changed pursuant to the experience study dated June 30, 2015. The assumed future salary increases, payroll growth, and inflation were decreased by 0.25 percent to 3.25 percent for payroll growth and 2.50 percent for inflation. Note 3: The city implemented GASB Statement No. 68 in fiscal 2015 (using a June 30, 2015 measurement date). This schedule is intended to present 10 -year trend information. Additional years will be added as they become available. Note 4: For purposes of this schedule, covered payroll is defined as "pensionable wages." Note 5: The Monticello Volunteer Firemen's Relief Association is comprised of volunteers; therefore there are no payroll expenditures (i.e. there are no covered payroll percentage calculations). 57 Employer's (2) Fiscal (Percentage) of Year Ending the Net Pension Employer's Liability Employer's Proportionate 100.0% 2016 Plan Fiduciary Net (1) Proportion Employer's Share of the State of Employer's Proportionate Position as a PERA Fiscal (Percentage) of Proportionate Share Minnesota's Share of the Net Pension Percentage of the Year Ending the Net Pension (Amount) of the Net Proportionate Share of Employer's Covered Liability as a Percentage of Total Pension June 30, Liability Pension Liability the Net Pension Liability Payroll its Covered Payroll Liability 2015 0.0578% $2,995,496 $0 $3,395,756 88.21% 78.2% 2016 0.0588% 4,774,268 62,387 3,651,024 130.77% 68.9% Monticello Fire Department Relief Association Employer's Proportionate Share (Amount) of the Net Pension Liability (Asset) (a) ($9,325) (23,180) Employer's Covered Payroll' (b) N/A N/A Employer's Proportionate Share of the Net Pension Liability as a Percentage of its Covered Payroll (a/b) N/A N/A Plan Fiduciary Net Position as a Percentage of the Total Pension Liability 100.9% 102.0% Note 1: Changes in Plan Provisions. On January 1, 2015, the Minneapolis Employees Retirement Fund was merged into the GERF, which increased the total pension liability by $1.1 billsion and increased the fiduciary plan net position by $892 million. Upon consolidation, state and employer contributions were revised. Note 2: Changes in Actuarial Assumptions. (1) 2015 Changes - The assumed post-retirement benefit increse rate was changed from 1.00 percent per year through 2030 and 2.50 percent per year thereafter to 1.00 percent per year through 2035 and 2.50 percent per year thereafter. (2) 2016 Changes - The assumed post-retirement benefit increase rate was changed from 1.00 percent per year through 2035 and 2.5 percent per year thereafter to 1.00 percent per year for all future years. The assumed investment return and the single discount rate were both changed from 7.90 percent to 7.50 percent. Other assumptions were changed pursuant to the experience study dated June 30, 2015. The assumed future salary increases, payroll growth, and inflation were decreased by 0.25 percent to 3.25 percent for payroll growth and 2.50 percent for inflation. Note 3: The city implemented GASB Statement No. 68 in fiscal 2015 (using a June 30, 2015 measurement date). This schedule is intended to present 10 -year trend information. Additional years will be added as they become available. Note 4: For purposes of this schedule, covered payroll is defined as "pensionable wages." Note 5: The Monticello Volunteer Firemen's Relief Association is comprised of volunteers; therefore there are no payroll expenditures (i.e. there are no covered payroll percentage calculations). 57 Employer's Proportion Fiscal (Percentage) of Year Ending the Net Pension December 31, Liability 2015 100.0% 2016 100.0% Employer's Proportionate Share (Amount) of the Net Pension Liability (Asset) (a) ($9,325) (23,180) Employer's Covered Payroll' (b) N/A N/A Employer's Proportionate Share of the Net Pension Liability as a Percentage of its Covered Payroll (a/b) N/A N/A Plan Fiduciary Net Position as a Percentage of the Total Pension Liability 100.9% 102.0% Note 1: Changes in Plan Provisions. On January 1, 2015, the Minneapolis Employees Retirement Fund was merged into the GERF, which increased the total pension liability by $1.1 billsion and increased the fiduciary plan net position by $892 million. Upon consolidation, state and employer contributions were revised. Note 2: Changes in Actuarial Assumptions. (1) 2015 Changes - The assumed post-retirement benefit increse rate was changed from 1.00 percent per year through 2030 and 2.50 percent per year thereafter to 1.00 percent per year through 2035 and 2.50 percent per year thereafter. (2) 2016 Changes - The assumed post-retirement benefit increase rate was changed from 1.00 percent per year through 2035 and 2.5 percent per year thereafter to 1.00 percent per year for all future years. The assumed investment return and the single discount rate were both changed from 7.90 percent to 7.50 percent. Other assumptions were changed pursuant to the experience study dated June 30, 2015. The assumed future salary increases, payroll growth, and inflation were decreased by 0.25 percent to 3.25 percent for payroll growth and 2.50 percent for inflation. Note 3: The city implemented GASB Statement No. 68 in fiscal 2015 (using a June 30, 2015 measurement date). This schedule is intended to present 10 -year trend information. Additional years will be added as they become available. Note 4: For purposes of this schedule, covered payroll is defined as "pensionable wages." Note 5: The Monticello Volunteer Firemen's Relief Association is comprised of volunteers; therefore there are no payroll expenditures (i.e. there are no covered payroll percentage calculations). 57 Required Supplementary Information Schedules of Employer's Pension Contributions Last Ten Fiscal Years Fiscal Year Ending December 31, 2015 2016 Fiscal Year Ending December 31, 2014 2015 2016 Public Employees Retirement Association - General Employees Retirement Fund Contributions in Relation to the Statutorily Required Statutorily Required Contribution Deficiency Employer's Covered Contributions Contributions (Excess) Payroll (a) (b) (a -b) (c) $ 266,042 $ 266,042 $ $ 3,547,217 267,516 267,516 3,566,884 Monticello Fire Department Relief Association Statutorily Determined Actual Contributions Contributions Paid (a) (b) CITY OF MONTICELLO Contributions as a Percentage of Covered Payroll (b/c) 7.5% 7.5% $ 108,186 $ 108,186 $ 120,027 120,027 123,656 123,656 Contribution Deficiency (Excess) (a -b) Note 1: For purposes of this schedule, covered payroll is defined as "pensionable wages." Note 2: The Monticello Volunteer Firemen's Relief Association is comprised of volunteers; therefore there are no payroll expenditures (i.e. there are no covered payroll percentage calculations). 58 CITY OF MONTICELLO Required Supplementary Information Schedule of Changes in the Fire Relief Association's Net Pension Liability (Asset) and Related Ratios 2015 2016 Total pension liability Service cost $ 77,343 $ 79,730 Interest 41,888 44,224 Changes in benefit terms 90,761 Experience gain/(loss) (53,156) Benefit payments, including refund of member contributions (128,101) (1,168) Net change in total pension liability (8,870) 160,391 Total pension liability - beginning 1,026,005 1,017,135 Total pension liability - ending (A) 1,017,135 1,177,526 Plan fiduciary net position Contributions - State $ 122,027 $ 123,656 Contributions - Municipal - - Net investment income (17,673) 55,902 Benefit payments, including refund of member contributions (128,101) (1,168) Administrative expenses (3,532) (4,144) Net change in plan fiduciary net position (27,279) 174,246 Plan fiduciary net position - beginning 1,053,739 1,026,460 Plan fiduciary net position - ending (B) 1,026,460 1,200,706 Net pension liability (asset) - ending (A) -(B) (9,325) (23,180) Plan fiduciary net position as a percentage of the total pension liability 100.9% 102.0% Covered payroll' N/A N/A Net pension liability as a percentage of covered payroll' N/A N/A Notes to Schedule: This schedule is built prospectively until it contains ten years of data. 'The Association is comprised of volunteers, therefore, there are no payroll expenditures (i.e., there are no covered payroll percentage calculations) 59 CITY OF MONTICELLO Required Supplementary Information Schedule of Funding Progress City of Monticello Other Post -Employment Benefits Plan Unfunded Unfunded Actuarial Actuarial Actuarial Actuarial Liability as a Valuation Date Accrued Value of Accrued Funded Covered Percentage January 1, Liability Plan Assets Liability Ratio Payroll of Payroll 2008 $ 302,787 $ $ 302,787 % $ 3,080,457 9.83% 2011 362,290 362,290 3,108,685 11.65 2014 265,486 265,486 3,914,601 6.78 IZCITY OF MMontic110 (This page left blank intentionally) 61 CITY OF MONTICELLO Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance Budget and Actual - General Fund For the Year Ended December 31, 2016 (continued) 62 Orginal and Final Variance with Budget Actual Final Budget Revenues Property taxes $ 6,196,500 $ 6,204,429 $ 7,929 Franchise taxes 264,400 263,900 (500) Special assessments 300 242 (58) Licenses and permits 338,900 668,602 329,702 Intergovernmental 300,477 389,005 88,528 Charges for services 268,364 351,702 83,338 Fines and forfeitures 42,100 30,656 (11,444) Investment earnings 100,000 99,237 (763) Other revenues 84,959 263,783 178,824 Total revenues 7,596,000 8,271,556 675,556 Expenditures: Current General government Mayor and council 53,925 57,507 3,582 City administration 320,099 320,450 351 City clerk 42,864 66,031 23,167 Finance 428,980 393,754 (35,226) Audit 45,000 39,273 (5,727) City assessing 52,115 50,415 (1,700) Legal 37,000 29,152 (7,848) Human resources 118,688 116,522 (2,166) Planning and zoning 218,023 210,173 (7,850) Information technology services 11,540 692 (10,848) City hall 215,244 197,006 (18,238) Prairie center building 14,120 8,917 (5,203) Public safety Law enforcement 1,222,627 1,212,080 (10,547) Fire and rescue 333,823 289,010 (44,813) Fire relief 80,000 123,656 43,656 Building inspections 369,663 350,304 (19,359) Civil defense 3,930 1,234 (2,696) Animal control 51,348 46,943 (4,405) National Guard 16,050 13,550 (2,500) (continued) 62 CITY OF MONTICELLO Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance Budget and Actual - General Fund For the Year Ended December 31, 2016 (Continued) 63 Orginal and Final Variance with Budget Actual Final Budget Expenditures (continued) Public works Public works administration $ 194,771 $ 126,327 $ (68,444) Engineering 160,058 111,795 (48,263) Public works inspecitons 88,809 62,100 (26,709) Streets and alleys 976,962 806,098 (170,864) Ice and snow removal 284,280 264,232 (20,048) Shop and garage 204,101 171,079 (33,022) Stormwater 73,121 29,277 (43,844) Street lighting 263,900 231,976 (31,924) Sanitation Refuse and recycling collection 614,437 600,300 (14,137) Transit Bus service 40,000 41,250 1,250 Recreation and culture Community celebrations 2,500 5,684 3,184 Senior center 101,672 99,124 (2,548) Park operations 824,997 775,738 (49,259) Park ballfields 27,300 20,538 (6,762) Shade tree 63,527 75,802 12,275 Library 40,526 44,823 4,297 Total expenditures 7,596,000 6,992,812 (603,188) Excess (deficiency) of revenues over expenditures - 1,278,744 1,278,744 Other financing sources Sale of capital assets 11,180 11,180 Net change in fund balance - 1,289,924 1,289,924 Fund balance at beginning of year 4,986,796 4,986,796 - Fund balance at end of year $ 4,986,796 $ 6,276,720 $ 1,289,924 63 CITY OF MONTICELLO Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance Budget and Actual - Community Center Fund For the Year Ended December 31, 2016 64 Orginal and Final Variance with Budget Actual Final Budget Revenues Property taxes $ 364,000 $ 364,000 $ - Charges for services 1,391,110 1,395,573 4,463 Investment earnings - 14,986 14,986 Other revenues 24,216 12,273 (11,943) Total revenues 1,779,326 1,786,832 7,506 Expenditures Current Recreation and culture Community center operations 1,647,026 1,447,512 (199,514) Community center programming 132,300 206,933 74,633 Total expenditures 1,779,326 1,654,445 (124,881) Net change in fund balance - 132,387 132,387 Fund balance at beginning of year 629,442 629,442 - Fund balance at end of year $ 629,442 $ 761,829 $ 132,387 64 Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance Budget and Actual - Economic Development Authority Fund For the Year Ended December 31, 2016 Revenues Property taxes Tax increments Investment earnings Other revenues Total revenues Expenditures Current Economic development General operations Land held for resale adjustment Developmental activities Total expenditures Excess (deficiency) of revenues over expenditures Other financing uses Transfers out Net change in fund balance Fund balance at beginning of year Fund balance at end of year CITY OF MONTICELLO Orginal and Final 171,171 Variance with Budget Actual Final Budget $ 280,000 $ 279,422 $ (578) 675,994 668,352 (7,642) 65,000 60,528 (4,472) 1,750 290,409 288,659 1,022,744 1,298,711 275,967 305,050 171,171 (133,879) - 96,100 96,100 358,893 263,475 (95,418) 663,943 530,746 (133,197) 358,801 767,965 409,164 (200,000) (188, 500) 11,500 158,801 579,465 420,664 6,562,865 6,562,865 - $ 6,721,666 $ 7,142,330 $ 420,664 65 Notes to the Required Supplementary Information December 31, 2016 Budgetary Information The city follows these procedures in establishing the budgetary data reflected in the basic financial statements: A. Prior to September 1, the city administrator submits to the city council a proposed operating budget for the fiscal year commencing the following January 1. The operating budget includes proposed expenditures and the means of financing them. The city council adopts the proposed budget as amended and adjusted by the city council and certifies the proposed property tax levy to the county auditor according to Minnesota Statutes. B. Public hearings are conducted at the city council's chambers in the Monticello Community Center. C. On or before December 28, the final budget is legally enacted by city council resolution and the final property tax levy is certified to the county auditor. D. Management is authorized to transfer budgeted amounts between departments within a fund; however, any revisions that alter the total expenditures of any fund must be approved by the city council. E. The city has legally adopted budgets for the General Fund and all special revenue funds. Expenditures may not legally exceed budgeted appropriations at the total fund level. Monitoring of budgets is maintained at the department level. All amounts over budget have been approved by the city council through the disbursement process. The city is not legally required to adopt an annual budget for the nonmajor special revenue funds, the Debt Service Fund, and the Capital Projects Funds. Project - length financial plans are adopted for the Debt Service and Capital Projects Funds. F. Budgets are adopted on a basis consistent with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Budgeted amounts are as originally adopted or amended by the city council. All annual appropriations lapse at year-end. CITY OF Monticello CITY OF MONTICELLO v�ZAul 41 Adam— OTC I NA 1©-NMAJ R GC VEA W-ENTA U - s, - L - -iow _ - NONMAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS are used to account for revenue derived from specific taxes or other earmarked revenue sources (other than for major capital projects) that are restricted by law or administrative action to expenditures for specified purposes. Minnesota Investment Fund - Established to account for the administration of loans to local businesses while following state and federal guidelines. Cemetery Fund — Established to account for the activities of cemetery operations. The city maintains two cemeteries: Riverside and Hillside. CDBG Revitalization Fund — Established to account for funding and activities for the CDBG Revitalization Grant. CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS are used to account for resources used for the acquisition and construction of capital assets by the city, except for those financed by proprietary funds. Storm SewerAccess Fund — This fund was established to account for fees collected from building permits for new construction and lot development. The fees will finance major improvements to the city's storm sewer system. City Street Reconstruction Fund— This fund was established to account for annual improvements to the city's infrastructure based on a reconstruction schedule. Street Lighting Improvement Fund — This fund was established to account for activities incorporating street lighting into designated areas throughout the city. A portion of the city's electric franchise fee is the main revenue source for this fund. Park and Pathway Dedication Fund — This fund was established to account for restricted fees collected from developers for park land acquisition and for park and pathway improvements. The fund also accumulates resources from other sources used for the same purposes. CITY OF MONTICELLO Combining Balance Sheet Nonmajor Governmental Funds December 31, 2016 67 Special Revenue Funds Capital Project Funds City Street Street Park & Minnesota CDBG - Storm Sewer Recon- Lighting Pathway Investment Cemetery Revitalization Access struction Improvement Dedication Total ASSETS Cash and investments $ 1,138,164 $ 31,039 $ 363 $ 1,397,396 $ 1,758,513 $ 631,554 $ 632,138 $ 5,589,167 Receivables Due from other governmental units - - - - - 87,764 - 87,764 Prepaid items 1,239 - - 1,239 Notes receivable - - 116,779 - - - - 116,779 Total assets $ 1,138,164 $ 32,278 $ 117,142 $ 1,397,396 $ 1,758,513 $ 719,318 $ 632,138 $ 5,794,949 LIABILITIES Accounts and contracts payable $ - $ 550 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 11,277 $ 11,827 DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES Unavailable revenue - notes receivable - 116,779 - 116,779 FUND BALANCES Nonspendable - 1,239 - 1,239 Restricted for economic development 1,138,164 - 363 1,138,527 Restricted for perpetual care - 30,489 - 30,489 Assigned for capital improvements - - - 1,397,396 1,758,513 719,318 620,861 4,496,088 Total fund balances 1,138,164 31,728 363 1,397,396 1,758,513 719,318 620,861 5,666,343 Total liabilities, deferred inflows of resources, and fund balances $ 1,138,164 $ 32,278 $ 117,142 $ 1,397,396 $ 1,758,513 $ 719,318 $ 632,138 $ 5,794,949 67 CITY OF MONTICELLO Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance Nonmajor Governmental Funds For the Year Ended December 31, 2016 Revenues: Franchise taxes Charges for services Investment earnings Other revenues Total revenues Expenditures: Current Public works Recreation and culture Capital outlay Public works Recreation and culture Total expenditures Excess (deficiency) of revenues over expenditures Other financing sources (uses) Transfers in Transfers out Total other financing sources (uses) Net change in fund balance Fund balance at begining of year Fund balance at end of year Special Revenue Funds Capital Project Funds City Street Street Park & Minnesota CDBG - Storm Sewer Recon- Lighting Pathway Investment Cemetery Revitalization Access struction Improvement Dedication Total $ $ - $ $ - $ $ 77,790 $ $ 77,790 14,517 460,683 - 475,200 17,760 601 5 16,771 28,178 9,328 18,512 91,155 - - - - - - 17,929 17,929 17,760 15,118 5 477,454 28,178 87,118 36,441 662,074 - - - 18,540 - - - 18,540 17,037 - - 63,181 80,218 - 49,460 - 49,460 - - - 1,342,558 1,342,558 - 17,037 - 18,540 - 49,460 1,405,739 1,490,776 17,760 (1,919) 5 458,914 28,178 37,658 (1,369,298) (828,702) - - - - - 753,500 753,500 (235,567) (45,608) - (281,175) - - (235,567) (45,608) - 753,500 472,325 17,760 (1,919) 5 223,347 (17,430) 37,658 (615,798) (356,377) 1,120,404 33,647 358 1,174,049 1,775,943 681,660 1,236,659 6,022,720 $ 1,138,164 $ 31,728 $ 363 $ 1,397,396 $ 1,758,513 $ 719,318 $ 620,861 $ 5,666,343 22 AMID- till r` j r sw --_ INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS are used to account for the financing of centralized services to city departments on a cost -reimbursement basis (including depreciation). Benefit Accrual Fund — This fund was established to account for resources accumulated to satisfy paid -time -off (PTO) and sick leave liabilities of governmental employees. Central Equipment Fund — This fund was established to account for equipment purchase and rental to various governmental fund departments. Information Technology (IT) Services Fund — This fund was established to account for the accumulation and distribution of various IT related costs, including communications, software support, capital and non -capital equipment, and software purchases. CITY OF MONTICELLO Combining Statement of Net Position Internal Service Funds December 31, 2016 Benefit Central IT Accrual Equipment Services Total ASSETS Current assets Cash and investments $ 264,219 $ 764,353 $ 213,705 $ 1,242,277 Noncurrent assets Capital assets Machinery and equipment - 960,855 17,013 977,868 Less accumulated depreciation (175,241) (11,839) (187,080) Total noncurrent assets - 785,614 5,174 790,788 TOTAL ASSETS 264,219 1,549,967 218,879 2,033,065 LIABILITIES Current liabilities Accounts payable - - 709 709 Accrued interest payable 819 - 819 Bonds payable due within one year - 120,000 120,000 Compensated absences due within one year 100,613 - - 100,613 Total current liabilities 100,613 120,819 709 222,141 Noncurrent liabilities Bonds payable, net current portion - 605,000 - 605,000 Compensated absences payable 159,049 - 159,049 Total noncurrent liabilities 159,049 605,000 - 764,049 TOTAL LIABILITIES 259,662 725,819 709 986,190 NET POSITION Net investment in capital assets - 60,614 5,174 65,788 Unrestricted 4,557 763,534 212,996 981,087 TOTAL NET POSITION $ 4,557 $ 824,148 $ 218,170 $ 1,046,875 Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Net Position Internal Service Funds For the Year Ended December 31, 2016 Operating revenues Charges to other funds Operating expenses Personal services Materials and supplies Other services and charges Depreciation Total operating expenses Operating income Nonoperating revenues (expenses) Investment earnings Interest expense Total nonoperating revenues (expenses) Change in net position Net position at beginning of year Net position at end of year CITY OF MONTICELLO Benefit Central IT Accrual Equipment Services Total $ 33,504 $ 193,800 $ 298,981 $ 526,285 33,504 - - 33,504 - 41,101 41,101 - 169,454 169,454 - 80,504 3,403 83,907 33,504 80,504 213,958 327,966 - 113,296 85,023 198,319 4,557 12,125 1,820 18,502 - (16,182) - (16,182) 4,557 (4,057) 1,820 2,320 4,557 109,239 86,843 200,639 - 714,909 131,327 846,236 $ 4,557 $ 824,148 $ 218,170 $ 1,046,875 70 CITY OF MONTICELLO Combining Statement of Cash Flows Internal Service Funds For the Year Ended December 31, 2016 71 Benefit Central IT Accrual Equipment Services Total Cash flow from operating activities Cash received from internal customers $ 33,504 $ 193,800 $ 298,981 $ 526,285 Cash paid to suppliers for goods and services - - (195,696) (195,696) Net cash provided by operating activities 33,504 193,800 103,285 330,589 Cash flows from capital and related financing activities Acquisition of capital assets - (159,041) - (159,041) Principal payments on long-term debt (115,000) (115,000) Interest and fiscal charges paid on long-term debt (16,259) (16,259) Net cash (used) by capital and related financing activities - (290,300) - (290,300) Cash flows from investing activities Interest on investments 4,557 12,125 1,820 18,502 Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 38,061 (84,375) 105,105 58,791 Cash and cash equivalents - January 1 226,158 848,728 108,600 1,183,486 Cash and cash equivalents - December 31 $ 264,219 $ 764,353 $ 213,705 $ 1,242,277 Reconciliation of operating income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities: Operating income (loss) $ - $ 113,296 $ 85,023 $ 198,319 Adjustments to Reconcile Operating Income (Loss) to Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities: Depreciation 80,504 3,403 83,907 Changes in assets and liabilities: (Increase) decrease in prepaid items - 26,873 26,873 Increase (decrease) in accounts and contracts payable - (12,014) (12,014) Increase (decrease) in compensated absences 33,504 - - 33,504 Net cash provided by operating activities $ 33,504 $ 193,800 $ 103,285 $ 330,589 71 lZCIOF MontikeHo (This page left blank intentionally) 72 71i TFI-E s U P L Y SC EDIUL 7Z!t Schedule of Revenues (Sources) and Expenditures (Uses) General Fund For the Year Ended December 31, 2016 Revenue and other sources - summary: Property taxes Franchise taxes Special assessments Licenses and permits Intergovernmental Charges for services Fines and forfeitures Investment earnings Other Sales of capital assets Interfund transfers Total Revenues & Other Sources Revenue and other sources - detail: Taxes Property tax - current Property tax - delinquent Mobile home tax Penalties and interest - taxes Franchise taxes Franchise taxes - electric Franchise taxes - other Special assessments Assessment for services/projects Licenses & Permits Liquor license Beer license Other business licenses & permits Building permits Fire sprinkler permits Variance/conditional use permits Driveway permits Grading permits Mobile home permits Excavation permits Right-of-way permits Sign/banner permits Animal licenses CITY OF MONTICELLO (continued) 73 2016 Variance with 2012 2013 2014 2015 Final 2016 Final Actual Actual Actual Actual Budget Actual Budget $ 5,711,491 $ 5,605,101 $ 5,527,958 $ 5,906,255 $ 6,196,500 $ 6,204,429 $ 7,929 195,500 217,000 216,500 216,500 264,400 263,900 (500) 10,349 22,351 22,808 1,330 300 242 (58) 275,198 331,136 378,810 461,049 338,900 668,602 329,702 301,895 372,632 320,691 354,679 300,477 389,005 88,528 312,807 281,138 319,477 349,601 268,364 351,702 83,338 63,106 41,124 1,900 42,474 42,100 30,656 (11,444) 85,603 (52,134) 150,754 64,037 100,000 99,237 (763) 406,167 169,997 180,104 241,721 84,959 263,783 178,824 - - - 30,473 - 11,180 11,180 1,729 - - - - - - 7,363,845 6,988,345 7,119,002 7,668,119 7,596,000 8,282,736 686,736 5,420,093 5,505,158 5,483,145 5,840,880 6,177,000 6,152,157 (24,843) 249,876 75,279 24,140 46,786 - 31,704 31,704 12,790 13,362 17,575 15,077 14,500 16,324 1,824 28,732 11,302 3,098 3,512 5,000 4,244 (756) 195,000 216,500 216,500 216,500 263,900 263,900 - 500 500 - - 500 - (500) 10,349 22,351 22,808 1,330 300 242 (58) 50,290 50,320 44,612 45,640 48,000 45,895 (2,105) 913 912 964 1,013 900 1,013 113 4,673 3,476 3,707 2,545 3,500 5,295 1,795 207,574 260,981 315,466 395,024 280,000 598,983 318,983 - - - 215 - - - 2,800 2,550 2,600 2,100 1,100 - (1,100) 75 50 25 75 150 30 (120) - - - - 200 - (200) 380 475 95 325 200 180 (20) 1,250 3,050 3,850 6,125 - 7,125 7,125 3,551 3,092 3,158 2,677 - 3,144 3,144 3,320 5,790 4,025 4,135 4,500 5,694 1,194 372 440 308 1.175 350 1.243 893 (continued) 73 CITY OF MONTICELLO Schedule of Revenues (Sources) and Expenditures (Uses) General Fund For the Year Ended December 31, 2016 (Continued) 74 2016 Variance with 2012 2013 2014 2015 Final 2016 Final Actual Actual Actual Actual Budget Actual Budget Intergovernmental Revenue Pera increase aid $ 6,741 $ 6,741 $ 6,741 $ 6,741 $ 6,740 $ 6,741 $ 1 State highway aid - operating 109,379 107,173 111,280 125,258 101,737 131,898 30,161 Fire department aid - operating 74,221 109,594 108,186 120,027 80,000 123,656 43,656 Police department aid - operating 59,062 65,767 63,205 66,814 63,000 68,710 5,710 County operating grant - street/highway 41,370 38,579 - 19,642 19,000 55,780 36,780 County operating grant - civil defense 11,122 11,678 13,157 2,221 12,000 2,220 (9,780) County operating grant - recycling - 33,100 18,122 13,976 18,000 - (18,000) Charges for Services Zoning/subdivision fees 2,500 850 1,200 1,050 700 (700) Sale of maps and publications 38 15 - - 25 - (25) Assessment searches 2,850 7,125 8,174 11,100 2,500 12,760 10,260 Blight notice fee 350 2,200 (1,650) 350 - 320 320 Final plat fee 100 50 250 150 - - - Planning administration fee 30,007 450 550 900 600 5,950 5,350 NSF fee - - 90 30 - 30 30 Inspection/construction fees 451 861 983 826 965 965 Inspection fees - buildings - - - - - - - Contractor licensing fee 550 1,300 1,825 1,075 100 825 725 Fire protections fees - townships 133,773 124,227 124,227 126,439 126,439 131,717 5,278 Fire emergency response fee 7,000 4,250 4,883 11,250 4,000 4,900 900 Fire - other fees 6,024 3,091 2,050 2,165 1,000 3,814 2,814 Blight mowing fees 682 1,865 (559) 625 1,000 450 (550) Rental housing fees 36,415 43,355 55,030 45,210 45,000 49,020 4,020 Animal control fees 28,755 29,539 34,462 36,869 31,000 36,089 5,089 Miscellaneous pubic works 186 - 8,981 - - - - Tree and brush removal charge - 2,200 6,755 1,000 3,290 2,290 Recycling bin fee 485 - - 260 - - - Garbage fee - taxable 44,069 44,199 44,992 90,310 44,000 89,656 45,656 Garbage miscellaneous fee 660 786 17,488 - - - - Garbage surcharge - not taxable 7,863 7,887 2,340 240 2,500 300 (2,200) Field/Tourneyfees 3,250 3,906 4,019 4,544 3,500 5,679 2,179 Park rental fees 4,524 4,982 5,099 6,305 5,000 4,962 (38) Memorial program revenue - - - 1,404 - - - Developer cost reimbursement 138 200 2,843 1,744 750 750 General charges for services 2,137 - - - - 225 225 Fines & Forfeitures Court fines 48,768 39,399 - 41,761 42,000 30,150 (11,850) Animal impound fines 145 225 400 713 100 506 406 Liquor license violation 1,500 1,500 1,500 - - - - Administration offense fines 12,693 - - (continued) 74 CITY OF MONTICELLO Schedule of Revenues (Sources) and Expenditures (Uses) General Fund For the Year Ended December 31, 2016 (Continued) 75 2016 Variance with 2012 2013 2014 2015 Final 2016 Final Actual Actual Actual Actual Budget Actual Budget Investment Earnings Investment earnings $ 73,623 $ (62,833) $ 145,211 $ 64,037 $ 100,000 $ 99,237 $ (763) Interest - loans 11,980 10,699 5,543 - - - - Miscellaneous Revenue City property rental 1,600 1,600 1,600 1,600 1,600 1,600 - Billboard land rental 32,023 19,888 20,146 2,150 20,000 21,149 1,149 Lease - Prairie Center 37,933 38,476 37,511 22,500 21,000 24,006 3,006 Lease - communication tower - - 8,000 22,180 24,000 24,905 905 Contributions 6,277 23,250 4,000 5,958 2,500 5,315 2,815 Sale of city property 3,021 374 1,994 1,831 500 10,650 10,150 Sale of lock boxes 684 1,015 855 1,368 700 1,710 1,010 Tree Sales - - 5,600 6,026 - 7,533 7,533 Copies 381 - 21 49 70 19 (51) Refunds & reimbursables 76,892 44,100 55,030 75,416 - 88,860 88,860 Assessment fee reimbursement 29,850 24,525 24,675 23,026 24,150 24,150 Fire contributions - - 11,400 13,268 7,852 7,852 Insurance claims 195,830 9,433 - 29,926 - - - Other miscellaneous 21,676 7,336 9,272 36,423 14,589 46,034 31,445 Other Financing Sources Sales of capital assets - - - 30,473 - 11,180 11,180 Transfers from other funds 1,729 - - - - - - Total revenues and other sources $ 7,363,845 $ 6,988,345 $ 7,119,002 $ 7,668,119 $ 7,596,000 $ 8,282,736 $ 686,736 Expenditures and other uses - summary General government $ 1,412,578 $ 1,389,599 $ 1,438,346 $ 1,457,376 $ 1,549,577 $ 1,482,666 $ (66,911) Public safety 1,784,357 1,844,833 1,845,073 1,972,986 2,077,441 2,036,777 (40,664) Public works 1,702,395 1,700,161 1,792,870 1,709,063 2,246,002 1,802,884 (443,118) Sanitation 500,037 505,996 517,956 563,477 614,437 600,300 (14,137) Transit - - 10,000 40,000 40,000 41,250 1,250 Recreation and culture 814,260 853,777 792,678 964,385 1,060,522 1,021,709 (38,813) General unallocated 279,302 165,923 12,584 8,082 8,021 7,226 (795) Transfers out and other uses 2,393,502 92,000 293,000 297,012 - - - Total expenditures and other uses $ 8,886,431 $ 6,552,289 $ 6,702,507 $ 7,012,381 $ 7,596,000 $ 6,992,812 $ (603,188) Expenditures and other uses - divisions General government Mayor and council $ 51,988 $ 53,696 $ 52,181 $ 52,572 $ 53,925 $ 57,507 $ 3,582 City administration 228,738 260,322 273,993 312,491 320,099 320,450 351 City clerk 38,933 2,425 41,835 2,979 42,864 66,031 23,167 Finance 337,348 326,510 385,662 377,867 428,980 393,754 (35,226) Audit 39,227 47,823 53,541 37,798 45,000 39,273 (5,727) City assessing 49,600 49,664 49,832 50,466 52,115 50,415 (1,700) Legal 40,275 46,905 29,303 36,946 37,000 29,152 (7,848) (continued) 75 CITY OF MONTICELLO Schedule of Revenues (Sources) and Expenditures (Uses) General Fund For the Year Ended December 31, 2016 (Continued) 76 2016 Variance with 2012 2013 2014 2015 Final 2016 Final Actual Actual Actual Actual Budget Actual Budget General government (continued) Human resources $ 84,041 $ 93,067 $ 90,565 $ 117,249 $ 118,688 $ 116,522 $ (2,166) Planning and zoning 163,629 182,753 220,080 244,976 218,023 210,173 (7,850) Information technology services 130,102 95,572 33,759 19,872 11,540 692 (10,848) City hall 233,602 215,507 193,186 190,833 207,223 189,780 (17,443) Prairie center building 15,095 15,355 14,409 13,327 14,120 8,917 (5,203) Public safety Law Enforcement 1,187,382 1,190,441 1,098,403 1,174,439 1,222,627 1,212,080 (10,547) Fire and rescue 207,778 222,141 306,780 309,970 333,823 289,010 (44,813) Fire relief 74,221 109,594 108,186 120,027 80,000 123,656 43,656 Building inspections 248,376 251,007 266,544 304,858 369,663 350,304 (19,359) Civil defense 2,719 9,707 1,660 1,500 3,930 1,234 (2,696) Animal control 49,594 47,426 49,439 48,754 51,348 46,943 (4,405) National Guard 14,287 14,517 14,061 13,438 16,050 13,550 (2,500) Public works Public works administration 176,457 113,882 122,151 124,504 194,771 126,327 (68,444) Engineering 200,287 224,028 195,841 110,555 160,058 111,795 (48,263) Public works inspecitons 64,827 54,878 36,867 32,084 88,809 62,100 (26,709) Streets and alleys 655,170 689,046 735,629 737,836 976,962 806,098 (170,864) Ice and snow 133,193 210,552 308,387 263,020 284,280 264,232 (20,048) Shop and garage 219,646 186,741 177,644 185,837 204,101 171,079 (33,022) Stormwater 51,468 12,064 16,842 26,712 73,121 29,277 (43,844) Parking lots 4,568 2,965 3,814 2,030 - - Street lighting 196,779 206,005 195,695 226,485 263,900 231,976 (31,924) Sanitation Refuse and recycling collection 500,037 505,996 517,956 563,477 614,437 600,300 (14,137) Transit Bus service - - 10,000 40,000 40,000 41,250 1,250 Recreation and culture Community celebrations 5,165 1,186 688 2,199 2,500 5,684 3,184 Senior center 88,441 90,219 97,547 97,115 101,672 99,124 (2,548) Ice arena 75,000 75,000 - - - - Park operations 533,537 572,985 570,639 706,934 824,997 775,738 (49,259) Park ballfields 29,419 25,517 18,149 16,971 27,300 20,538 (6,762) Shade tree 52,983 53,475 68,891 104,990 63,527 75,802 12,275 Library 29,715 35,395 36,764 36,176 40,526 44,823 4,297 General unallocated Insurances and other 279,302 165,923 12,584 8,082 8,021 7,226 (795) Transfers out and other uses Transfers out 2,393,502 92,000 293,000 297,012 - - - Total expenditures & other uses $ 8,886,431 $ 6,552,289 $ 6,702,507 $ 7,012,381 $ 7,596,000 $ 6,992,812 $ (603,188 Revenue over/(under) expenditures $ (1,522,586) $ 436,056 $ 416,495 $ 655,738 $ - $ 1,289,924 1,289,924 76 Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance Budget and Actual - Minnesota Investment Fund For the Year Ended December 31, 2016 Orginal and Final Budget Actual Revenues Investment earnings $ 25,000 $ 17,760 Fund balance at beginning of year 1,120,404 1,120,404 Fund balance at end of year $ 1,145,404 $ 1,138,164 CITY OF MONTICELLO Variance with Final Budget $ (7,240) $ (7,240) 77 Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance Budget and Actual - Cemetery Fund For the Year Ended December 31, 2016 Orginal and Final Budget Actual Revenues Charges for services $ 26,000 $ 14,517 Investment earnings 1,000 601 Total revenues 27,000 15,118 Expenditures Current Recreation and culture Cemetery operations Net change in fund balance Fund balance at beginning of year Fund balance at end of year 27,000 33,647 $ 33,647 17,037 (1,919) 33,647 $ 31,728 CITY OF MONTICELLO Variance with Final Budget $ (11,483) (399) (11,882) (9,963) (1,919) $ (1,919) 78 CITY OF MONTICELLO Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance Budget and Actual - CDBG-Reviatlization Fund For the Year Ended December 31, 2016 Orginal and Final Variance with Budget Actual Final Budget Revenues Investment earnings $ - $ 5 $ 5 Fund balance at beginning of year 358 358 - Fund balance at end of year $ 358 $ 363 $ 5 79 Schedule of Assets, Liabilities, and Fund Balances Economic Development Authority December 31, 2016 LIABILITIES Accounts and contracts payable $ Intrafund payable Unearned revenue Total liabilities DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES CITY OF MONTICELLO TIF TIF EDA TIF General GMEF ASSETS Future 6(d) Cash and investments $ 1,913,983 $ 1,148,898 $ Receivables 24 Unremitted taxes 523 - Delinquent taxes 740 Accounts receivable 100 Intrafund receivable 971,755 Prepaid items 1,638 Land held for resale 2,030,757 - TOTAL ASSETS $ 4,919,496 $ 1,148,898 $ LIABILITIES Accounts and contracts payable $ Intrafund payable Unearned revenue Total liabilities DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES CITY OF MONTICELLO TIF TIF TIF TIF TIF TIF Future 6(d) 19 20 22 24 $ 703,243 $ 183,566 $ 140,843 $ 561,455 $ 76,641 - - - 163,200 - $ 703,243 $ 183,566 $ 140,843 $ 724,655 $ 76,641 6,596 $ $ - $ $ $ $ - $ - 44,497 386,574 - - 163,200 6,596 44,497 549,774 Unavailable revenue - property taxes 740 FUND BALANCES Nonspendable 2,032,395 - Restricted - 1,148,898 Assigned 2,879,765 - Total fund balance 4,912,160 1,148,898 TOTAL LIABILITIES, AND FUND BALANCES $ 4,919,496 $ 1,148,898 $ (d) = decertified 703,243 183,566 140,843 174,881 76,641 (44,497) - - - - - (44,497) 703,243 183,566 140,843 174,881 76,641 - $ 703,243 $ 183,566 $ 140,843 $ 724,655 $ 76,641 (Continued) M Schedule of Assets, Liabilities, and Fund Balances Economic Development Authority December 31, 2016 (Continued) LIABILITIES Accounts and contracts payable $ Intrafund payable Unearned revenue Total liabilities DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES Unavailable revenue - property taxes FUND BALANCES 134,989 19,715 134,989 19,715 CITY OF MONTICELLO TIF TIF TIF GAAP Total 35 38 39 Reconciliation EDA 2,166 $ $ 56 $ $ 4,951,330 - - 1,901 740 100 (971,755) - 1,638 - - 2,193,957 2,166 $ $ 56 $ (971,755) $ 7,149,666 $ - $ - $ - $ 6,596 115,305 270,675 (971,755) - - - (163,200) - 115,305 270,675 (1,134,955) 6,596 Nonspendable - - - Restricted 101,812 (34,803) 144 2,166 (115,305) Assigned - - - Total fund balance 101,812 (34,803) 144 2,166 (115,305) TOTAL LIABILITIES, AND FUND BALANCES $ 101,812 $ 100,186 $ 19,859 $ 2,166 $ - $ (d) = decertified 740 - 2,032,395 (270,619) 163,200 2,274,667 - 2,835,268 (270,619) 163,200 7,142,330 56 $ (971,755) $ 7,149,666 81 TIF TIF TIF 29 30 34 ASSETS Cash and investments $ 100,434 $ 100,186 $ 19,859 $ Receivables Unremitted taxes 1,378 - - Delinquent taxes - Accounts Intrafund receivable Prepaid items Land held for resale - - - TOTAL ASSETS $ 101,812 $ 100,186 $ 19,859 $ LIABILITIES Accounts and contracts payable $ Intrafund payable Unearned revenue Total liabilities DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES Unavailable revenue - property taxes FUND BALANCES 134,989 19,715 134,989 19,715 CITY OF MONTICELLO TIF TIF TIF GAAP Total 35 38 39 Reconciliation EDA 2,166 $ $ 56 $ $ 4,951,330 - - 1,901 740 100 (971,755) - 1,638 - - 2,193,957 2,166 $ $ 56 $ (971,755) $ 7,149,666 $ - $ - $ - $ 6,596 115,305 270,675 (971,755) - - - (163,200) - 115,305 270,675 (1,134,955) 6,596 Nonspendable - - - Restricted 101,812 (34,803) 144 2,166 (115,305) Assigned - - - Total fund balance 101,812 (34,803) 144 2,166 (115,305) TOTAL LIABILITIES, AND FUND BALANCES $ 101,812 $ 100,186 $ 19,859 $ 2,166 $ - $ (d) = decertified 740 - 2,032,395 (270,619) 163,200 2,274,667 - 2,835,268 (270,619) 163,200 7,142,330 56 $ (971,755) $ 7,149,666 81 CITY OF MONTICELLO Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Other Financing Sources (Uses) Economic Development Authority For the Year Ended December 31, 2016 82 EDA TIF TIF TIF TIF TIF TIF General GMEF Future 6 (d) 19 20 22 24 Revenues Property taxes $ 279,422 $ $ $ $ - $ - $ - $ - Tax increments - 30,972 17,592 281,330 41,634 Investment earnings 20,454 15,544 9,515 2,274 1,830 7,159 894 Interest on intrafund loans 20,525 - - - - - - Other revenues 290,409 - - - - - - Total revenues 610,810 15,544 9,515 33,246 19,422 288,489 42,528 Expenditures: Current Salary and wages 50,910 - - - - - - Benefits 18,048 Supplies 81 - Professional services - legal 25,322 1,023 Professional services - other 59,679 - LPV Insurance 1,867 - - - - Legal and general publications 312 31 31 31 31 Property taxes 1,318 - - - - Marketing 2,500 Dues and membership 4,846 - Utilities 585 228 IT services 1,409 - Travel and conferences 709 Land adjustment to market 50,300 - Other expenses 3,585 1,126 Excess increments - 166,289 Interest on intrafund loans - - - PAYG payments to third parties - - 6,333 48,751 20,520 Total expenditures 221,471 - - 31 6,364 217,448 20,551 Excess (deficiency) of revenues over expenditures 389,339 15,544 9,515 33,215 13,058 71,041 21,977 Other financing uses Transfers out - - - - - - - Net change in fund balances 389,339 15,544 9,515 33,215 13,058 71,041 21,977 Fund balance at beginning of year 4,522,821 1,133,354 (44,497) 693,728 150,351 127,785 103,840 54,664 Fund balance at end of year $ 4,912,160 $ 1,148,898 $ (44,497) $ 703,243 $ 183,566 $ 140,843 $ 174,881 $ 76,641 (Continued) 82 Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Other Financing Sources (Uses) Economic Development Authority For the Year Ended December 31, 2016 (Continued) Revenues Property taxes Tax increments Investment earnings Interest on intrafund loans Other revenues Total revenues Expenditures: Current Salary and wages Benefits Supplies Professional services - legal Professional services - other LPV Insurance Legal and general publications Property taxes Marketing Dues and membership Utilities IT services Travel and conferences Land adjustment to market Other expenses Excess increments Interest on intrafund loans PAYG payments to third parties Total expenditures Excess (deficiency) of revenues over expenditures Other financing uses Transfers out Net change in fund balances Fund balance at beginning of year Fund balance at end of year CITY OF MONTICELLO TIF TIF TIF TIF TIF TIF GAAP Total 29 30 34 35 38 39 Reconciliation EDA $ - $ - $ - $ $ - $ - $ $ 279,422 22,590 9,120 208,243 11,421 45,450 $ (115,305) 668,352 1,330 1,350 135 43 - - 60,528 - - - - (20,525) - - - - - - - 290,409 23,920 10,470 208,378 43 11,421 45,450 (20,525) 1,298,711 31 31 - 3,493 16,969 - 17,000 3,524 6,920 6,946 6,920 6,946 94,892 (41,749) $ 101,812 $ (34,803) $ 50,910 18,048 81 1,957 28,302 - 59,679 - - - 1,867 31 31 31 591 - - - 1,318 2,500 4,846 813 1,409 - 709 45,800 96,100 - 4,711 - - 166,289 4,873 12,159 (20,525) - - - - - - 92,573 31 1,988 4,904 12,159 25,275 530,746 208,347 (1,945) 6,517 33,291 (45,800) 767,965 (188,500) - - (188,500) 19,847 (1,945) 6,517 33,291 (45,800) 579,465 (19,703) 4,111 (121,822) (303,910) 209,000 6,562,865 144 $ 2,166 $ (115,305) $ (270,619) $ 163,200 $ 7,142,330 83 CITY OF MONTICELLO Schedule of Assets, Liabilities, Deferred Inflows of Resources, and Fund Balances Debt Service Activities December 31, 2016 ASSETS Cash and cash equivalents Receivables Unremitted special assessments Deliquent special assessments Deferred special assessments Total assets LIABILITIES Accounts and contracts payable DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES Unavailable revenue - special assessments FUND BALANCES Restricted for debt service Total liabilities, deferred inflows of resources, and fund balances 84 General Obligation Bonds 2007A 2008B 2010A 2011A 2014A 2015B 2016A Improvement Sewer Improvement Refunding Bonds Bonds Bonds Total $ (182,448) $ 1,067,997 $ 1,020,505 $ 1,261,783 $ 36,728 $ 66,621 $ 263,638 $ 3,534,824 6,810 - 3,165 - - - - 9,975 2,555 6,607 117 - - 9,279 297,254 - 159,154 1,927,740 - 154,754 818,044 3,356,946 $ 124,171 $ 1,067,997 $ 1,189,431 $ 3,189,640 $ 36,728 $ 221,375 $ 1,081,682 $ 6,911,024 $ 208 $ 208 $ 208 $ 208 $ 208 $ 208 $ - $ 1,248 299,809 - 165,762 1,927,856 - 154,754 818,044 3,366,225 (175,846) 1,067,789 1,023,461 1,261,576 36,520 66,413 263,638 3,543,551 $ 124,171 $ 1,067,997 $ 1,189,431 $ 3,189,640 $ 36,728 $ 221,375 $ 1,081,682 $ 6,911,024 84 Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Other Financing Sources (Uses) Debt Service Activities For the Year Ended December 31, 2016 Revenues Property taxes Special assessments Investment earnings Total revenues Expenditures Debt service Principal Interest and fiscal charges Total expenditures Excess (deficiency) of revenues over expenditures Other financing sources Transfers in Net change in fund balance Fund balance at begining of year Fund balance at end of year CITY OF MONTICELLO 85 General Obligation Bonds 2007A 2008B 2010A 2011A 2014A 2015B 2016A Improvement Sewer Improvement Refunding Bonds Bonds Bonds Total $ 420,000 $ 500,000 $ 40,000 $ 330,000 $ 544,000 $ 250,000 $ - $ 2,084,000 116,066 - 68,483 336,961 - 27,855 263,182 812,547 674 21,492 7,798 4,794 689 520 456 36,423 536,740 521,492 116,281 671,755 544,689 278,375 263,638 2,932,970 1,124,653 1,472,000 270,000 2,320,000 350,000 145,000 - 5,681,653 58,548 95,706 34,708 107,008 165,519 67,627 529,116 1,183,201 1,567,706 304,708 2,427,008 515,519 212,627 - 6,210,769 (646,461) (1,046,214) (188,427) (1,755,253) 29,170 65,748 263,638 (3,277,799) 685,000 565,636 188,500 - - - 1,439,136 (646,461) (361,214) 377,209 (1,566,753) 29,170 65,748 263,638 (1,838,663) 470,615 1,429,003 646,252 2,828,329 7,350 665 - 5,382,214 $ (175,846) $ 1,067,789 $ 1,023,461 $ 1,261,576 $ 36,520 $ 66,413 $ 263,638 $ 3,543,551 85 IZCITY OF MMontic110 (This page left blank intentionally) 0 >'. -� REM �- TATIC yam' STATISTICAL SECTION The Statistical Section is included to provide detailed data on the physical, economic, social and political characteristics of the reporting government. It is intended to provide the user with a broader and more complete understanding of the government and its financial affairs than is possible from the basic financial statements and supplementary information included in the Financial Section. Paqe Financial trends Net Position by Component - Last Ten Fiscal Years 87 Changes in Net Position - Last Ten Fiscal years 88 Fund Balances of Governmental Funds - Last Ten Fiscal Years 90 Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds - Last Ten Fiscal Years 91 Governmental Funds Tax Revenues by Source - Last Ten Fiscal Years (modified accrual basis of accounting) 92 General Governmental Tax Revenues by Source - Last Ten Fiscal Years (accrual basis of accounting) 93 Revenue capacity Tax Capacity Value and Estimated Market Value of Taxable Property - Last Ten Fiscal Years 94 Property Tax Rates - All Direct and Overlapping Governments - Last Ten Fiscal Years 95 Property Tax Levies and Collections - Last Ten Fiscal Years 96 Principal Property Taxpayers - Current Year and Nine Years Ago 97 Water Sold by Customer Type (gallons) - Last Ten Fiscal Years 98 Water and Sewage Utility Rates - Last Ten Fiscal Years 99 Debt capacity Ratios of Outstanding Debt by Type - Last Ten Fiscal Years 100 Ratios of Net General Obligation Bonded Debt Outstanding - Last Ten Fiscal Years 101 Legal Debt Margin Information - Last Ten Fiscal Years 102 Computation of Direct and Overlapping Debt 103 Schedule of General Obligation Revenue Bond Coverage - Last Four Fiscal Years 104 Economic and demographic information Demographic and Economic Statistics - Last Ten Fiscal Years 105 Principal Employers - Current Year and Nine Years Ago 106 Operating information City Government Employees by Function/Program - Last Ten Fiscal Years 107 Operating Indicators by Function - Last Ten Fiscal Years 108 Capital Assets Statistics by Function - Last Ten Fiscal Years 110 Net Position by Component Last Ten Fiscal Years (accrual basis of accounting) Governmental activities Net investment in capital assets Restricted Unrestricted Total governmental net position Business -type activities Net investment in capital assets Restricted Unrestricted Total business -type net position Primary government Net investment in capital assets Restricted Unrestricted Total primary government net position CITY OF MONTICELLO 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 $ 12,476,536 $ 27,584,763 $ 33,712,370 $ 31,901,676 $ 38,242,040 $ 40,525,009 $ 44,268,757 $ 48,253,810 $ 38,099,568 $ 41,077,683 31,517,792 22,074,427 17,688,193 18,337,866 16,894,936 13,061,044 18,118,070 10,453,449 12,633,770 10,569,693 24,543,501 28,445,230 28,183,161 26,876,421 24,758,269 25,119,107 13,487,299 14,792,521 18,144,067 20,824,170 $ 68,537,829 $ 78,104,420 $ 79,583,724 $ 77,115,963 $ 79,895,245 $ 78,705,160 $ 75,874,126 $ 73,499,780 $ 68,877,405 $ 72,471,546 $ 33,971,151 $ 31,375,890 $ 29,910,696 $ 28,556,355 $ 25,031,043 $ 23,698,091 $ 20,496,832 $ 42,117,264 $ 40,722,087 $ 41,014,122 - 19,350 19,350 19,350 19,350 19,350 - - - - 6,441,470 4,529,830 2,846,018 6,363,148 6,901,353 7,642,046 6,463,638 9,121,952 8,163,982 9,052,590 $ 40,412,621 $ 35,925,070 $ 32,776,064 $ 34,938,853 $ 31,951,746 $ 31,359,487 $ 26,960,470 $ 51,239,216 $ 48,886,069 $ 50,066,712 $ 46,447,687 $ 58,960,653 $ 63,623,066 $ 60,458,031 $ 63,273,083 $ 64,223,100 $ 64,765,589 $ 90,371,074 $ 78,821,655 $ 82,091,805 31,517,792 22,093,777 17,707,543 18,357,216 16,914,286 13,080,394 18,118,070 10,453,449 12,633,770 10,569,693 30,984,971 32,975,060 31,029,179 33,239,569 31,659,622 32,761,153 19,950,937 23,914,473 26,308,049 29,876,760 $108,950,450 $114,029,490 $112,359,788 $112,054,816 $111,846,991 $110,064,647 $102,834,596 $124,738,996 $117,763,474 $122,538,258 $100 $80 c $60 $40 $20 Primary Government Net Position 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 ■ Net investment in capital assets ■ Restricted net position ■ Unrestricted net position Note 1: In fiscal years 2013 and 2012, the city had a change in accounting principle, a change in fund structure, and prior period adjustments. Prior years were not adjusted to reflect these changes. Note 2: The city implemented GASB Statement No. 68 and GASB Statement No. 71 in fiscal year 2015. Years prior to 2015 have not been restated. 87 CITY OF MONTICELLO Changes in Net Position Last Ten Fiscal Years (accrual basis of accounting) Expenses 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Governmental activities General government $ 1,844,320 $ 1,572,389 $ 1,780,972 $ 2,065,463 $ 2,111,710 $ 2,103,737 $ 1,623,727 $ 1,488,243 $ 1,447,725 $ 1,694,111 Public safety 1,693,116 1,792,351 2,849,272 1,766,712 1,788,595 1,819,378 1,884,981 1,880,193 1,960,009 2,187,363 Public works 4,559,460 4,634,167 3,827,501 3,579,291 4,838,544 5,045,729 5,163,461 5,223,345 5,312,612 5,480,074 Sanitation 509,208 514,208 547,160 534,903 495,693 500,037 487,268 517,956 563,477 600,300 Transit - - - - - - - 10,000 40,000 41,250 Recreation and culture 2,703,227 2,729,950 2,855,682 2,636,088 1,753,197 2,719,730 2,875,260 2,882,127 3,524,979 3,998,945 Economic development 769,584 510,126 842,819 2,647,687 1,199,936 803,594 1,005,813 1,084,620 1,547,875 756,620 Interest and fiscal charges 2,193,840 2,136,872 1,673,431 1,464,012 1,248,716 1,298,869 235,265 649,854 735,753 565,774 Total governmental activities expenses 14,272,755 13,890,063 14,376,837 14,694,156 13,436,391 14,291,074 13,275,775 13,736,338 15,132,430 15,324,437 Business -type activities Water utility 973,375 975,846 1,018,098 936,718 1,167,572 1,118,789 1,009,600 1,084,882 1,102,610 1,168,473 Sewage utility 2,000,610 2,085,485 2,074,447 2,495,976 2,340,555 2,480,657 2,466,660 2,762,357 2,661,990 2,618,887 Liquor 644,857 620,743 669,940 637,574 658,999 662,002 689,559 692,976 798,631 831,809 Fiber optics 84,594 1,590,237 2,792,813 3,815,377 5,702,480 5,228,428 5,240,871 2,919,170 2,536,461 2,483,262 Deputy registrar - - - - - - 293,531 300,236 313,968 345,492 Total business -type activities expenses 3,703,436 5,272,311 6,555,298 7,885,645 9,869,606 9,489,876 9,700,221 7,759,621 7,413,660 7,447,923 Total primary government expenses $ 17,976,191 $ 19,162,374 $ 20,932,135 $ 22,579,801 $ 23,305,997 $ 23,780,950 $ 22,975,996 $ 21,495,959 $ 22,546,090 $ 22,772,360 Program Revenues Governmental activities Charges for services General government $ 695,117 $ 523,228 $ 443,976 $ 491,304 $ 521,182 $ 619,992 $ 147,244 $ 180,145 $ 214,087 $ 274,309 Public safety 93,138 99,812 155,036 96,293 202,237 179,540 163,366 164,616 320,158 894,311 Public works 1,994,067 1,544,140 744,241 1,556,098 508,077 383,066 544,404 371,671 521,697 527,425 Sanitation - - 167,119 165,387 52,304 53,077 16,653 48,385 104,786 89,956 Recreation and culture 1,044,699 1,084,622 1,139,199 1,153,113 1,240,970 1,150,273 1,307,149 1,331,581 1,488,197 1,437,659 Economic development 6,768 15,875 155,769 - - - - - 14,653 301,232 Operating grants and contributions 160,147 159,192 269,492 424,845 253,127 252,784 293,710 295,828 355,041 389,005 Capital grants and contributions 3,616,870 948,340 2,067,509 4,124,271 2,083,511 1,841,915 1,079,738 1,774,628 2,667,710 3,297,265 Total governmental activities program revenues 7,610,806 4,375,209 5,142,341 8,011,311 4,861,408 4,480,647 3,552,264 4,166,854 5,686,329 7,211,162 Business -type activities Charges for services Water utility 867,873 973,776 1,019,390 828,635 1,078,133 1,304,923 1,214,570 1,117,226 1,126,718 1,172,258 Sewage utility 1,196,983 1,307,064 1,371,776 1,470,537 1,712,058 1,850,919 1,981,491 2,081,660 2,083,122 2,223,252 Liquor 1,002,933 1,059,479 1,043,256 1,174,767 1,151,171 1,214,745 1,318,276 1,289,369 1,524,338 1,409,406 Fiber optics - - - 456,820 1,610,258 1,747,587 1,606,720 1,761,978 1,642,403 1,739,566 Deputy registrar - - - - - 456,285 497,798 535,931 562,891 Capital grants and contributions 482,412 106,787 - - - - - 488,628 1,454,980 2,000,456 Total business -type activities program revenues 3,550,201 3,447,106 3,434,422 3,930,759 5,551,620 6,118,174 6,577,342 7,236,659 8,367,492 9,107,829 Total primary government program revenues $ 11,161,007 $ 7,822,315 $ 8,576,763 $ 11,942,070 $ 10,413,028 $ 10,598,821 $ 10,129,606 $ 11,403,513 $ 14,053,821 $ 16,318,991 F.E. CITY OF MONTICELLO Changes in Net Position Last Ten Fiscal Years (accrual basis of accounting) (continued) 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Net Governmental activities $ (6,661,949) $ (9,514,854) $ (9,234,496) $ (6,682,845) $ (8,574,983) $ (9,810,427) $ (9,723,511) $ (9,569,484) $ (9,446,101) $ (8,113,275) Business -type activities (153,235) (1,825,205) (3,120,876) (3,954,886) (4,317,986) (3,371,702) (3,122,879) (522,962) 953,832 1,659,906 Total primary government net expense $ (6,815,184) $ (11,340,059) $ (12,355,372) $ (10,637,731) $ (12,892,969) $ (13,182,129) $ (12,846,390) $ (10,092,446) $ (8,492,269) $ (6,453,369) General Revenues and Other Changes in Net Position Governmental activities Taxes Property taxes $ 6,418,124 $ 7,278,152 $ 7,628,547 $ 7,105,319 $ 7,406,358 $ 7,722,214 $ 7,961,229 $ 8,393,374 $ 8,683,585 $ 9,270,592 Tax increment 824,714 1,172,447 1,193,021 1,155,386 1,044,791 1,024,134 965,935 826,363 727,617 668,352 Franchise taxes - - 48,517 371,258 341,362 339,518 320,640 357,409 333,484 412,217 Unrestricted grants and contributions 288,940 158,340 406,735 37,665 19,359 38,618 65,228 27,502 - - Investment earnings 2,170,025 1,461,658 770,178 859,583 1,467,780 767,722 (189,128) 784,347 278,465 375,614 Other - - 41,173 - - 11,575 3,885 217,643 30,473 11,180 Gain on sale of capital assets 528,193 233,326 366,961 442,091 354,501 540,272 489,782 - - - Transfers 997,929 371,245 251,133 (5,774,257) 713,655 (2,420,489) 278,500 (3,411,500) 2,301,045 969,461 Total governmental activities 11,227,925 10,675,168 10,706,265 4,197,045 11,347,806 8,023,564 9,896,071 7,195,138 12,354,669 11,707,416 Business -type activities Investment earnings 326,356 547,703 188,178 236,131 495,484 264,589 (117,175) 399,757 108,191 128,080 Miscellaneous 62,664 136,356 42,360 125,326 1,555,509 100,687 65,468 - 88,157 5,218 Gain on extinguishment of debt - - - - - - - 20,990,451 - - Contribution of land to County - (5,511,547) - Transfer of operations - - - 356,900 Transfers (997,929) (371,245) (251,133) 5,774,257 (713,655) 2,420,489 (278,500) 3,411,500 (2,301,045) (969,461) Total business -type activities (608,909) 312,814 (20,595) 6,135,714 1,337,338 2,785,765 (330,207) 24,801,708 (7,616,244) (479,263) Total primary government $ 10,619,016 $ 10,987,982 $ 10,685,670 $ 10,332,759 $ 12,685,144 $ 10,809,329 $ 9,565,864 $ 31,996,846 $ 4,738,425 $ 11,228,153 Changes in Net Position Governmental activities $ 4,565,976 $ 1,160,314 $ 1,471,769 $ (2,485,800) $ 2,772,823 $ (1,786,863) $ 172,560 $ (2,374,346) $ 2,908,568 $ 3,594,141 Business -type activities (762,144) (1,512,391) (3,141,471) 2,180,828 (2,980,648) (585,937) (3,453,086) 24,278,746 (6,662,412) 1,180,643 Total primary government $ 3,803,832 $ (352,077) $ (1,669,702) $ (304,972) $ (207,825) $ (2,372,800) $ (3,280,526) $ 21,904,400 $ (3,753,844) $ 4,774,784 Note 1: The City made a fund structure change for the period ending December 31, 2013. Prior year data has not been restated as a result of this change. Note 2: The city implemented GASB Statement No. 68 and GASB Statement No. 71 in fiscal year 2015. Years prior to 2015 have not been restated. W CITY OF MONTICELLO Fund Balances of Governmental Funds Last Ten Fiscal Years (modified accrual basis of accounting) M 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 General Fund Reserved $ 430,294 $ 359,303 $ 392,541 $ 336,286 $ $ $ $ $ $ Unreserved 5,131,193 5,819,249 4,705,092 4,644,748 - Nonspendable - - - - 386,616 342,380 258,100 126,327 113,302 134,245 Restricted - - - - - - Committed 3,374,200 Assigned - - - - - - Unassigned 649,821 3,136,127 3,656,463 4,204,731 4,873,494 6,142,475 Total general fund $ 5,561,487 $ 6,178,552 $ 5,097,633 $ 4,981,034 $ 4,410,637 $ 3,478,507 $ 3,914,563 $ 4,331,058 $ 4,986,796 $ 6,276,720 All other governmental funds Reserved $ 27,072,957 $ 16,663,801 $ 10,280,326 $ 7,884,431 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Unreserved Special revenue 7,554,334 14,191,473 18,451,828 18,324,689 Capital projects (630,214) (1,839,478) (2,124,391) (1,532,220) - - - - - - Nonspendable 1,299,057 197,123 1,822,926 1,815,087 4,259,743 3,690,330 Restricted 22,140,662 21,480,938 10,928,985 10,453,449 8,619,905 6,987,234 Committed 2,662,124 - - - - - Assigned 9,138,626 8,655,488 6,485,727 7,321,744 11,109,806 13,320,718 Unassigned Special revenue (141,890) - - - - - Capital projects (1,435,666) - - - - - Total all other governmental funds $ 33,997,077 $ 29,015,796 $ 26,607,763 $ 24,676,900 $ 33,662,913 $ 30,333,549 $ 19,237,638 $ 19,590,280 $ 23,989,454 $ 23,998,282 Note 1: The City made a fund structure change for the period ending December 31, 2013. Prior year data has not been restated as a result of this change. Note 2: The city implemented GASB 54 for the financial reporting period ending December 31, 2011. Prior years have not been restated as a result of this change. M CITY OF MONTICELLO Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds Last Ten Fiscal Years (modified accrual basis of accounting) Note: The city made a fund structure change for the period ending December 31, 2013. Prior year data has not been modified to reflect this change 91 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Revenues Property taxes $ 6,190,599 $ 7,233,582 $ 7,502,844 $ 7,319,154 $ 7,294,635 $ 8,234,086 $ 7,985,695 $ 8,407,627 $ 8,638,401 $ 9,295,983 Tax increments 824,714 1,172,447 1,193,021 1,155,386 1,044,791 1,024,134 965,935 826,363 727,617 668,352 Franchise taxes - - 48,517 371,258 341,362 339,518 320,640 357,409 333,484 412,217 Special assessments 3,112,374 2,566,932 2,462,673 1,465,264 1,856,134 1,902,871 2,065,944 1,912,932 3,318,901 984,390 Licenses and permits 627,751 917,539 266,797 217,184 249,999 275,699 331,711 378,810 461,049 668,602 Intergovernmental 1,764,633 550,283 1,688,895 1,620,771 1,434,420 540,475 1,264,781 732,366 1,520,239 2,041,362 Charges for services 2,888,981 2,290,091 2,518,548 2,890,006 2,239,584 2,076,834 1,846,919 1,722,974 2,063,520 2,222,475 Fines and forfeitures 5,027 2,216 1,220 205 85 14,338 1,725 1,900 42,474 30,656 Investment earnings 2,170,025 1,461,658 770,178 859,583 1,467,780 767,722 (183,242) 738,956 261,856 357,112 Other revenues 372,502 197,988 435,186 643,873 603,019 753,832 700,776 413,113 475,170 589,394 Total revenues 17,956,606 16,392,736 16,887,879 16,542,684 16,531,809 15,929,509 15,300,884 15,492,450 17,842,711 17,270,543 Expenditures General government 1,899,097 1,579,164 1,634,395 1,997,458 2,039,270 2,023,674 1,576,653 1,450,930 1,465,458 1,489,892 Public safety 1,603,331 1,736,962 2,738,768 1,684,296 1,728,409 1,735,579 1,805,434 1,845,073 1,972,986 2,036,777 Public works 1,951,712 2,380,993 2,074,811 1,562,155 1,675,222 1,703,849 1,707,576 1,793,162 1,734,562 1,941,750 Sanitation 509,208 514,208 547,160 534,903 495,693 500,037 505,996 517,956 563,477 600,300 Transit - - - - - - - 10,000 40,000 41,250 Culture and recreation 2,214,108 2,220,368 2,355,669 2,164,534 2,419,369 2,272,595 2,472,987 2,386,832 2,622,991 2,756,372 Economic development 772,852 525,783 842,819 2,647,687 1,198,449 800,540 1,011,961 1,084,620 1,237,107 530,746 Capital outlay 6,430,421 3,522,196 1,946,153 4,138,459 4,067,251 2,829,049 1,357,254 2,220,883 2,238,365 6,235,029 Debt service Principal 3,388,382 5,037,028 6,749,293 5,001,000 4,860,000 5,174,500 5,290,750 5,411,000 5,028,000 5,681,653 Interest and fiscal charges 2,256,311 2,192,063 1,801,392 1,553,661 1,383,095 1,290,430 930,982 658,983 570,753 529,116 Bond issuance costs - - - - - - - - 71,358 107,050 Total expenditures 21,025,422 19,708,765 20,690,460 21,284,153 19,866,758 18,330,253 16,659,593 17,379,439 17,545,057 21,949,935 Excess of revenues over(under)expenditures (3,068,816) (3,316,029) (3,802,581) (4,741,469) (3,334,949) (2,400,744) (1,358,709) (1,886,989) 297,654 (4,679,392) Other financing sources (uses) Long-term debt issued 5,137,903 15,450,000 3,255,000 10,735,000 6,080,000 2,605,000 4,900,000 Premium (discount) on debt issued 83,710 - (19,530) 301,910 (12,374) 46,898 97,503 Refunded bonds redeemed - (15,908,564) (865,000) - (10,690,000) - - Refunding deferred amortized (loss; - (384,432) Sale of land held for resale (103,084) 74,650 - - - - Sale of capital assets 37,520 2,575 62,496 67,569 - 11,575 12,428 - 30,473 11,180 Transfers in 5,202,051 16,818,090 10,172,878 4,687,126 5,710,819 9,990,120 6,906,770 4,914,385 4,261,817 2,192,636 Transfers out (4,204,122) (16,446,845) (9,921,745) (4,431,158) (4,997,164) (10,732,901) (7,158,933) (8,325,885) (2,186,930) (1,223,175) Total other financing sources (uses) 6,153,978 (394,526) 313,629 2,694,007 11,750,565 (731,206) (10,929,735) 2,656,126 4,757,258 5,978,144 Net change in fund balances $ 3,085,162 $ (3,710,555) $ (3,488,952) $ (2,047,462) $ 8,415,616 $ (3,131,950) $ (12,288,4441 $ 769,137 $ 5,054,912 $ 1,298,752 Debt service as percentage of noncapital expenditures 36.9% 43.7% 45.6% 38.2% 42.6% 41.4% 41.7% 40.0% 35.1% 38.0% Note: The city made a fund structure change for the period ending December 31, 2013. Prior year data has not been modified to reflect this change 91 Governmental Funds Tax Revenues by Source Last Ten Fiscal Years (modified accrual basis of accounting) Year 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Change 2007-2016 Source: Finance Department CITY OF MONTICELLO Property Tax Franchise Tax Increment Tax Total $ 6,190,599 $ 824,714 $ $ 7,015,313 7,233,582 1,172,447 - 8,406, 029 7,502,844 1,193, 021 48,517 8,744, 382 7,319,154 1,155, 386 371,258 8,845, 798 7,294,635 1,044,791 341,362 8,680,788 8,234,086 1,024,134 339,518 9,597,738 7,985,695 965,935 320,640 9,272,270 8,407,627 826,363 357,409 9,591,399 8,638,401 727,617 333,484 9,699,502 9,295,983 668,352 412,217 10,376,552 50.2% -19.0% 100.0% 47.9% Tax Revenues by Source 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 ■ Property Tax ■ Tax Increment Franchise Tax 92 General Governmental Tax Revenues by Source Last Ten Fiscal Years (accrual basis of accounting) Year 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Change 2007-2016 Source: Finance Department CITY OF MONTICELLO Property Tax Franchise Tax Increment Tax Total $ 6,418,124 $ 824,714 $ $ 7,242,838 7,278,152 1,172,447 - 8,450,599 7,628,547 1,193,021 48,517 8,870,085 7,105, 319 1,155,386 371,258 8,631,963 7,406,358 1,044,791 341,362 8,792,511 7,722,214 1,024,134 339,518 9,085,866 7,961,229 965,935 320,640 9,247,804 8,393,374 826,363 357,409 9,577,146 8,683,585 727,617 333,484 9,744,686 9,270,592 668,352 412,217 10,351,161 44.4% -19.0% Tax Revenues by Source 100.0% 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 ■ Property Tax ■Tax Increment Franchise Tax 42.9% 93 Tax Capacity Value and Estimated Market Value of Taxable Property Last Ten Fiscal Years $30 $25 $20 N C ° $15 $10 $5 $- 2007 Total Taxable Net % of Tax Capacity Total Value * 1.1% $ 16,204,855 1.4% 17,312,075 1.7% 17,947,260 1.4% 17,400,280 1.4% 16,628,999 1.0% 19,579,693 0.9% 19,021,771 0.7% 24,646,698 0.6% 26,581,226 0.6% 28,307,628 Total Taxable Net Tax Capacity Value (Excludes Personal and Ag/Misc Property) CITY OF MONTICELLO % of Total Direct Total Total Tax Rate Market Value 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Note 1: The fiscal year is for the values in the year levied for taxes collectible in the following year. Note 2: *Tax exempt property values are not included in total net tax capacity value. Source: Wright County Certificate of Taxes and Taxable Properties. 42.458 $ 1,243,461,100 Real Property 1,282,400,700 46.191 1,245,407,600 45.822 1,188,222,100 Residential % of Commercial % of Personal % of Ag/Misc Year Property Total Property Total Property Total Property 2007 $ 6,929,517 42.8% $ 8,913,821 55.0% $ 177,822 1.1% $ 183,695 2008 7,443,331 43.0% 9,455,666 54.6% 176,289 1.0% 236,789 2009 7,506,973 41.8% 9,966,873 55.5% 174,223 1.0% 299,191 2010 6,165,704 35.4% 10,793,836 62.0% 189,563 1.1% 251,177 2011 5,307,260 31.9% 10,897,898 65.5% 194,825 1.2% 229,016 2012 4,611,403 23.6% 14,538,165 74.3% 235,633 1.2% 194,492 2013 4,824,117 25.4% 13,793,916 72.5% 239,129 1.3% 164,609 2014 5,408,138 21.9% 18,818,097 76.4% 235,713 1.0% 184,750 2015 5,861,759 22.1% 20,316,219 76.4% 238,732 0.9% 164,516 2016 6,505,649 23.0% 21,386,874 75.6% 248,668 0.9% 166,437 $30 $25 $20 N C ° $15 $10 $5 $- 2007 Total Taxable Net % of Tax Capacity Total Value * 1.1% $ 16,204,855 1.4% 17,312,075 1.7% 17,947,260 1.4% 17,400,280 1.4% 16,628,999 1.0% 19,579,693 0.9% 19,021,771 0.7% 24,646,698 0.6% 26,581,226 0.6% 28,307,628 Total Taxable Net Tax Capacity Value (Excludes Personal and Ag/Misc Property) CITY OF MONTICELLO % of Total Direct Total Total Tax Rate Market Value 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Note 1: The fiscal year is for the values in the year levied for taxes collectible in the following year. Note 2: *Tax exempt property values are not included in total net tax capacity value. Source: Wright County Certificate of Taxes and Taxable Properties. 42.458 $ 1,243,461,100 46.942 1,282,400,700 46.191 1,245,407,600 45.822 1,188,222,100 46.729 1,106, 541,400 49.773 1,219,719,700 42.234 1,201,075,800 44.709 1,513, 570,400 35.737 1,712,125,200 34.471 1,828,437,600 Residential ■ Commercial Net Tax Capacity as a Percentage of Market Value 1.3% 1.3% 1.4% 1.5% 1.5% 1.6% 1.6% 1.6% 1.6% 1.5% 94 Property Tax Rates - All Direct and Overlapping Governments Last Ten Fiscal Years 60 40 w M m s 20 Overlapping Taxing Districts Monticello School District #882 23.15 25.25 26.08 24.95 27.03 28.26 26.23 28.27 22.88 20.86 Property Tax Rates For the three highest taxing authorities 0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Note 1: Information reflects total tax rates levied by each entity. Tax rates are expressed in terms of "net tax capacity." A property's tax capacity is determined by multiplying its taxable market value by a state determined class rate. Class rates vary by property type and change periodically based on state legislation. Components of the direct rate are not readily available. Source: Wright County Special Districts 2.95 2.52 2.07 1.75 1.50 1.24 0.61 1.08 (Wright District #882 City CITY OF MONTICELLO Total (1) Direct and Overlapping 99.27 106.36 106.91 108.34 114.57 122.72 113.36 116.43 99.21 96.38 95 City Wright Year of Monticello County 2007 42.46 30.71 2008 46.94 31.65 2009 46.19 32.57 2010 45.82 35.82 2011 46.73 39.31 2012 49.77 43.45 2013 42.23 44.29 2014 44.71 43.45 2015 35.74 40.59 2016 34.47 39.97 60 40 w M m s 20 Overlapping Taxing Districts Monticello School District #882 23.15 25.25 26.08 24.95 27.03 28.26 26.23 28.27 22.88 20.86 Property Tax Rates For the three highest taxing authorities 0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Note 1: Information reflects total tax rates levied by each entity. Tax rates are expressed in terms of "net tax capacity." A property's tax capacity is determined by multiplying its taxable market value by a state determined class rate. Class rates vary by property type and change periodically based on state legislation. Components of the direct rate are not readily available. Source: Wright County Special Districts 2.95 2.52 2.07 1.75 1.50 1.24 0.61 1.08 (Wright District #882 City CITY OF MONTICELLO Total (1) Direct and Overlapping 99.27 106.36 106.91 108.34 114.57 122.72 113.36 116.43 99.21 96.38 95 CITY OF MONTICELLO Property Tax Levies and Collections Last Ten Fiscal Years PROPERTY TAXES Collected within the Total Collections Total Tax Year of the Net Levy Collections in to Date Abatements Total Uncollected Fiscal Levy for Tax Net % of Subsequent % of and % of Year Fiscal Year Credits Levy Amount Net Levy Years Amount Net Levy Adjustments Amount Net Levy 2007 $ 6,499,914 $ 261,362 $ 6,238,552 $ 6,044,463 96.9% $ 170,880 $ 6,215,343 99.6% $ (21,679) $ 1,530 0.0% 2008 7,600,189 267,056 7,333,133 7,118,136 97.1% 173,727 7,291,863 99.4% (39,184) 2,086 0.0% 2009 7,750,119 263,587 7,486,532 7,237,730 96.7% 212,481 7,450,211 99.5% (32,806) 3,515 0.0% 2010 7,648,269 278,930 7,369,339 7,155,141 97.1% 183,034 7,338,175 99.6% (26,695) 4,469 0.1% 2011 7,677,351 293,075 7,384,276 7,178,807 97.2% 178,326 7,357,133 99.6% (19,706) 7,437 0.1% 2012 7,850,042 - 7,850,042 7,759,174 98.8% 28,205 7,787,379 99.2% (57,415) 5,248 0.1% 2013 7,900,724 7,900,724 7,827,356 99.1% 36,950 7,864,306 99.5% (33,113) 3,305 0.0% 2014 8,151,086 8,151,086 8,109,373 99.5% 31,225 8,140,598 99.9% (7,012) 3,476 0.0% 2015 8,535,565 8,535,565 8,498,745 99.6% 18,906 8,517,651 99.8% (12,524) 5,390 0.1% 2016 9,205,700 9,205,700 9,177,787 99.7% - 9,177,787 99.7% (3,572) 24,341 0.3% TAX INCREMENTS Collected within the Total Collections Total Tax Year of the Net Levy Collections in to Date Abatements Total Uncollected Fiscal Levy for Tax Net % of Subsequent % of and % of Year Fiscal Year Credits Levy Amount Net Levy Years Amount Net Levy Adjustments Amount Net Levy 2007 $ 889,262 $ $ 889,262 $ 836,397 94.1% $ 1,222 $ 837,619 94.2% $ (51,643) $ 0.0% 2008 1,191,177 1,191,177 1,184,402 99.4% 4,874 1,189,276 99.8% (1,901) 0.0% 2009 1,247,605 1,247,605 1,205,582 96.6% 39,200 1,244,782 99.8% (2,823) 0.0% 2010 1,193,383 1,193,383 1,144,243 95.9% 36,309 1,180,552 98.9% (12,831) 0.0% 2011 1,071,686 1,071,686 1,044,309 97.4% 25,742 1,070,051 99.8% (1,635) 0.0% 2012 955,039 955,039 953,400 99.8% - 953,400 99.8% (1,639) 0.0% 2013 971,745 971,745 970,071 99.8% - 970,071 99.8% (1,674) 0.0% 2014 869,425 869,425 869,339 100.0% 60 869,399 100.0% (26) 0.0% 2015 729,130 729,130 727,558 99.8% - 727,558 99.8% (1,572) 0.0% 2016 668,351 668,351 668,351 100.0% 668,351 100.0% 0.0% Source: Wright County M Principal Property Taxpayers Current Year and Nine Years Ago $ 853,077,700 $ 17,047,664 64.1% (1) The market value and taxable net tax capacity value is for taxes levied in 2015, which are payable in 2016 Source: Wright County Certificate of Taxes and Taxable Properties CITY OF MONTICELLO 2007 Taxable Net Tax Market Value Capacity Value Rank $ 255,253,800 5,097,197 1 12,381,800 246,886 2 5,692,600 113,102 5 Percentage of Total Net Tax Capacity Value 36.6% 1.8% 0.8% 15,438,200 157,844 2016 1.1% 7,142,000 140,102 4 1.0% 5,291,000 Percentage of 6 (1) Taxable Net Tax 101,174 Total Net Tax Taxpayer Market Value Capacity Value Rank Capacity Value Xcel Energy (Northern States) $ 795,999,400 $ 15,913,229 1 59.9% Walmart Real Estate Bus Trust 10,520,000 209,650 2 0.8% Target Corporation 10,120,400 201,658 3 0.8% CentraCare Medical Center (New River) 7,444,000 148,880 4 0.6% Home Depot USA, Inc. 6,720,700 133,664 5 0.5% Muller Family Theatres 5,401,300 106,895 6 0.4% AX TC Retail, LP 5,154,900 101,598 7 0.4% Tapper's Holdings, LLC 3,956,800 77,636 8 0.3% WSI Industries Inc. 3,900,100 77,252 9 0.3% Minnegasco Inc. 3,860,100 77,202 10 0.3% Ocello LLC Individual Individuals Gould Brothers Chev, LLP Individual Monticello Washington Assoc Palf Co. $ 853,077,700 $ 17,047,664 64.1% (1) The market value and taxable net tax capacity value is for taxes levied in 2015, which are payable in 2016 Source: Wright County Certificate of Taxes and Taxable Properties CITY OF MONTICELLO 2007 Taxable Net Tax Market Value Capacity Value Rank $ 255,253,800 5,097,197 1 12,381,800 246,886 2 5,692,600 113,102 5 Percentage of Total Net Tax Capacity Value 36.6% 1.8% 0.8% 15,438,200 157,844 3 1.1% 7,142,000 140,102 4 1.0% 5,291,000 105,070 6 0.8% 5,096,200 101,174 7 0.7% 5,012,100 98,762 8 0.7% 4,592,300 91,096 9 0.7% 4,715,400 82,758 10 0.6% $ 320,615,400 $ 6,233,991 44.7% M Water Sold by Customer Type (gallons) Last Ten Fiscal Years Year 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 % of Residential Total $ 467,672,488 71.3% 409,879,658 69.0% 430,263,791 75.0% 376,687,840 67.1% 348,580,072 66.0% 426,358,402 69.0% 383,079,041 68.8% 328,835,772 68.2% 325,188,041 68.1% 329,068,876 67.7% CITY OF MONTICELLO $700 $600 $500 c $400 0 $300 $200 $100 $0 2007 2008 Source: City of Monticello utility billing department Water Sold by Customer Type (gallons) 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 ■ Government ■ Industrial Commercial ■ Residential M Total % of % of % of Water % of Commercial Total Industrial Total Government Total Sold Total $ 91,517,828 14.0% $ 49,035,750 7.5% $ 47,703,225 7.3% $ 655,929,291 100.0% 84,234,653 14.2% 47,790,000 8.0% 52,154,498 8.8% 594,058,809 100.0% 69,825,753 12.2% 38,713,057 6.8% 34,601,796 6.0% 573,404,397 100.0% 90,001,208 16.0% 47,225,176 8.4% 47,227,405 8.4% 561,141,629 100.0% 84,194,027 15.9% 50,971,196 9.7% 44,219,755 8.4% 527,965,050 100.0% 97,281,410 15.7% 46,654,712 7.5% 47,866,428 7.7% 618,160,952 100.0% 85,819,687 15.4% 45,954,136 8.2% 42,206,803 7.6% 557,059,667 100.0% 79,370,922 16.5% 38,308,124 7.9% 35,566,000 7.4% 482,080,818 100.0% 76,283,322 16.0% 38,897,216 8.1% 37,005,919 7.8% 477,374,498 100.0% 77,795,226 16.0% 42,407,860 8.7% 36,647,583 7.5% 485,919,545 100.0% $700 $600 $500 c $400 0 $300 $200 $100 $0 2007 2008 Source: City of Monticello utility billing department Water Sold by Customer Type (gallons) 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 ■ Government ■ Industrial Commercial ■ Residential M CITY OF MONTICELLO Water and Sewage Utility Rates Last Ten Fiscal Years N/A - Not Available Source: City of Monticello utility billing department 0 Water Sewage Residential Commercial Rate Tier 1 Rate Tier 2 Rate Tier 3 Rate Tier 4 Rate Tier 1 Rate Tier 2 Rate Tier 3 Rate Tier 4 Rate Tier 1 Rate Tier 1 Base Rate 501-4,000 4,001-13,369 Over 13,369 Base Rate 501-4,000 4,001-13,369 Over 13,369 Base Rate Over 500 Fiscal First 500 per 100 per 100 per 100 First 500 per 100 per 100 per 100 First 500 per 100 Year Cubic Feet Cubic Feet Cubic Feet Cubic Feet Cubic Feet Cubic Feet Cubic Feet Cubic Feet Cubic Feet Cubic Feet 2007 $ 10.26 $ 0.62 $ 0.71 N/A $ 10.26 $ 0.62 N/A N/A $ 11.96 $ 2.15 2008 11.91 0.74 0.84 N/A 11.91 0.74 N/A N/A 13.75 2.47 2009 12.40 0.78 0.88 N/A 12.40 0.78 N/A N/A 14.45 2.60 2010 13.00 0.85 0.95 N/A 14.75 0.95 N/A N/A 15.15 2.75 2011 14.30 0.95 1.10 1.20 14.30 0.95 1.10 1.20 16.75 3.00 2012 15.44 1.03 1.19 1.30 15.44 1.03 1.19 1.30 18.76 3.36 2013 17.00 1.13 1.31 1.43 17.00 1.13 1.31 1.43 20.65 3.70 2014 17.00 1.13 1.31 1.43 17.00 1.13 1.31 1.43 20.65 3.70 2015 17.85 1.19 1.38 1.50 17.85 1.19 1.38 1.50 21.69 3.89 2016 18.85 1.22 1.41 1.50 18.85 1.22 1.41 1.50 22.69 3.97 N/A - Not Available Source: City of Monticello utility billing department 0 Ratios of Outstanding Debt by Type Last Ten Fiscal Years Governmental activities General obligation bonds Special assessment Other Tax increment Net premium (discount) Total GO bonds Notes Certificates of indebtedness Total general obligation debt Non -general obligation bonds Revenue Contract for deed Total governmental activites Business -type activities General obligation revenue bonds Non -general obligation Revenue bonds PFA loans Net premium (discount) Total business -type activities CITY OF MONTICELLO 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 $ 28,415,000 $ 24,075,000 $ 21,535,000 $ 21,320,000 $ 29,490,000 $ 26,625,000 $13,010,000 $12,203,653 $11,689,653 $12,730,000 7,132,903 15,737,903 12,822,903 11,531,903 10,196,903 8,877,403 7,506,653 10,487,000 9,563,000 7,686,000 680,000 575,000 470,000 - - - - - - - 691,438 651,542 631,516 572,079 818,803 744,748 265,320 67,350 190,196 159,266 36,919,341 41,039,445 35,459,419 33,423,982 40,505,706 36,247,151 20,781,973 22,758,003 21,442,849 20,575,266 9,515,592 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 445,000 385,000 325,000 265,000 46,434,933 41,039,445 35,459,419 33,423,982 40,505,706 36,247,151 21,226,973 23,143,003 21,767,849 20,840,266 6,157,974 5,742,098 5,209,011 4,612,454 3,690,898 2,739,341 1,782,784 985,000 664,293 564,293 - - - - - - - - $ 53,257,200 $ 47,345,836 $ 40,668,430 $ 38,036,436 $ 44,196,604 $ 38,986,492 $ 23,009,757 $ 24,128,003 $ 21,767,849 $ 20,840,266 $ 907,097 $ 907,097 $ 837,097 $ 747,097 $ 654,097 $ 568,597 $ 3,479,347 $ 3,206,347 $ 2,930,347 $ 2,460,000 26,445,000 26,445,000 26,445,000 26,445,000 26,445,000 26,445,000 - - - - - - - - - 615,268 1,927,850 14,364 (502,517) (479,980) (457,441) (434,904) (412,366) (360,211) 31,941 30,339 27,354 $ 921,461 $ 26,849,580 $ 26,802,117 $ 26,734,656 $ 26,664,193 $ 26,601,231 $ 29,564,136 $ 3,238,288 $ 3,575,954 $ 4,415,204 Total primary government $ 54,178,661 $ 74,195,416 $ 67,470,547 $ 64,771,092 $ 70,860,797 $ 65,587,723 $ 52,573,893 $ 27,366,291 $ 25,343,803 $ 25,255,470 % of personal income (1) 14.3% 18.9% 17.6% 15.8% 16.8% 13.7% 10.5% 5.1% 4.5% 4.3% Per capita debt (1) $ 4,815 $ 6,528 $ 5,879 $ 5,632 $ 5,554 $ 5,071 $ 4,055 $ 2,106 $ 1,931 $ 1,899 (1) See the Schedule of Demographic and Economic Statistics. Note: Details regarding the city's outstanding debt can be found in the notes to basic financial statements 100 CITY OF MONTICELLO Ratios of Net General Obligation Bonded Debt Outstanding Last Ten Fiscal Years (1) Does not include revenue bonds. (2) See the Schedule of Taxable Net Tax Capacity Value and Estimated Market Value of Taxable Property for the estimated actual market value. (3) See the Schedule of Demographic and Economic Statistics. Source: Details regarding the city's outstanding debt can be found in the notes to basic financial statements. 101 Percentage of Less Amounts Estimated General Available Actual Market Obligation in Debt Value of Year Bonds (1) Service Fund Total Property (2) Per Capita (3) 2007 $ 37,826,438 $ 18,520,552 $ 19,305,886 1.55% $ 1,716 2008 41,946,542 9,936,332 32,010,210 2.50% 2,816 2009 36,296,516 2,346,286 33,950,230 2.73% 2,958 2010 34,171,079 2,363,382 31,807,697 2.68% 2,766 2011 41,159, 803 12, 727,140 28,432,663 2.57% 2,228 2012 36,815,748 12,952,896 23,862,852 1.96% 1,845 2013 24,706,320 2,750,079 21,956,241 1.83% 1,694 2014 26,349,350 3,919,070 22,430,280 1.48% 1,726 2015 24,728,535 5,382,214 19,346,321 1.13% 1,474 2016 23,327,620 3,543,551 19,784,069 1.08% 1,488 (1) Does not include revenue bonds. (2) See the Schedule of Taxable Net Tax Capacity Value and Estimated Market Value of Taxable Property for the estimated actual market value. (3) See the Schedule of Demographic and Economic Statistics. Source: Details regarding the city's outstanding debt can be found in the notes to basic financial statements. 101 Legal Debt Margin Information Last Ten Fiscal Years CITY OF MONTICELLO 2013 2014 2015 2016 $35,671,296 $45,407,112 $51,363,756 $ 54,853,128 6,200,000 10,872,000 9,888,000 7,951,000 $29,471,296 $34,535,112 $41,475,756 $ 46,902,128 17.4% 23.9% 19.3% Legal Debt Margin Calculation for Fiscal Year 2016 Market value Debt limit (3% of market value) Debt applicable to limit General obligation bonds 23,141,000 Less amounts for general obligation bonds not subject to debt limit (15,190,000) Total net debt applicable to limit Legal debt margin 14.5% $ 1,828,437,600 $ 54,853,128 7,951,000 $ 46,902,128 Source: Details regarding the city's outstanding debt can be found in the notes to basic financial statements. Market value data provided in Wright County Certificate of Taxes and Taxable Properties. Note: All Minnesota municipalities (counties, cities, towns, and school districts) are subject to statutory "net debt" limitations under the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, § 475.53. Under this provision, beginning with issues having a settlement date after June 30, 2008, the state of Minnesota increased the legal debt limit from 2 percent to 3 percent of the city's taxable market value. 102 Fiscal Year 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Legal debt limit $23,203,682 $ 37,303,833 $38,074,842 $35,646,663 $33,196,242 $36,591,591 Total net debt applicable to debt limit 6,100,000 6,180,000 5,585,000 4,985,000 4,365,000 3,795,000 Legal debt margin $17,103,682 $31,123,833 $32,489,842 $30,661,663 $28,831,242 $32,796,591 Total net debt applicable to debt limit as a percentage of debt limit 26.3% 16.6% 14.7% 14.0% 13.1% 10.4% CITY OF MONTICELLO 2013 2014 2015 2016 $35,671,296 $45,407,112 $51,363,756 $ 54,853,128 6,200,000 10,872,000 9,888,000 7,951,000 $29,471,296 $34,535,112 $41,475,756 $ 46,902,128 17.4% 23.9% 19.3% Legal Debt Margin Calculation for Fiscal Year 2016 Market value Debt limit (3% of market value) Debt applicable to limit General obligation bonds 23,141,000 Less amounts for general obligation bonds not subject to debt limit (15,190,000) Total net debt applicable to limit Legal debt margin 14.5% $ 1,828,437,600 $ 54,853,128 7,951,000 $ 46,902,128 Source: Details regarding the city's outstanding debt can be found in the notes to basic financial statements. Market value data provided in Wright County Certificate of Taxes and Taxable Properties. Note: All Minnesota municipalities (counties, cities, towns, and school districts) are subject to statutory "net debt" limitations under the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, § 475.53. Under this provision, beginning with issues having a settlement date after June 30, 2008, the state of Minnesota increased the legal debt limit from 2 percent to 3 percent of the city's taxable market value. 102 CITY OF MONTICELLO Computation of Direct and Overlapping Debt As of December 31, 2016 Estimated Net percentage Amount bonded debt applicable applicable to Jurisdiction outstanding (1) to city (2) city DIRECT DEBT: City of Monticello $ 20,840,266 100.0% $ 20,840,266 OVERLAPPING DEBT: I.S.D. 882 45, 215, 000 76.3% 34,499, 045 Wright County 59,935,000 18.8% 11,267,780 Total Overlapping Debt 45,766,825 Total direct and overlapping debt $ 66,607,091 (1) Gross bonded debt outstanding. (2) The percentage of overlapping debt applicable is estimated using taxable assessed property values. Applicable percentages were estimated by determining the portion of the government's taxable assessed value that is within the City's boundaries and dividing it by the government's total taxable assessed value. Note: Overlapping governments are those that coincide, at least in part, with the geographic boundaries of the City. This schedule estimates the portion of the outstanding debt of those overlapping governments that is borne by the residents and businesses of the City. This process recognizes that, when considering the government's ability to issue and repay long-term debt, the entire debt burden borne by the residents and businesses should be taken into account. However, this does not imply that every taxpaver is a resident and, therefore, responsible for repavinq the debt of each overlappinq qovernment. Source: The Wright County auditor provided the debt outstanding and estimated applicable percentages for the school district and county. 103 CITY OF MONTICELLO Schedule of General Obligation Revenue Bond Coverage Last Four Fiscal Years Sewaae Fund: Net Revenue Gross Operating Available for Debt Service Requirements (3) Year Revenues (1) Expenses(2) Debt Service Principal Interest Total Coverage 2013 $ 2,006,718 $ 1,476,418 $ 530,300 $ - $ - $ - - 2014 2,081,660 1,570,197 511,463 273,000 91,963 364,963 140.1% 2015 2,083,122 1,479,157 603,965 276,000 84,158 360,158 167.7% 2016 2,223,252 1,411,831 811,421 570,830 78,002 648,832 125.1% (1) Total revenues does not include investment earnings. (2) Total operating expenses excluding depreciation. (3) The first year of bond payments is 2014. Schedule excludes telecommunications bonds. No other revenue bonds existed before 2013. Source: Finance Department 104 CITY OF MONTICELLO Demographic and Economic Statistics Last Ten Fiscal Years Notes/sources: (1) 2010 U.S. Bureau of Census; 2006-2009 and 2011-2015 Minnesota State Demographic Center population estimates. (2) Annual average unemployment provided by the Minnesota Department of Employment & Economic Development. (3) ISD No. 882 enrollment information was obtained from the district audit report. The enrollment information is based on the resident ADMs (average daily membership) served. (4) This estimated personal income number is calculated by taking the per capita personal income and multiplying it by the city's population. Also see note (5) regarding the per capita personal income figures. (5) Per capita personal income data is provided by the Bureau of Economic Analysis. Monticello's estimates are based on Wright County information. Wright County, where Monticello is located, is the smallest, relevant statistical tracking area. Data is subject o annual revisions by the Bureau of Economic Analysis. 105 Per Estimated Capita Unemployment School Personal Personal Year Population (1) rate (2) Enrollment (3) Income (4) Income (5) 2007 11,253 4.8% 3,910 $ 379,102,317 $ 34,374 2008 11,366 5.7% 3,921 391, 740,556 36,162 2009 11,476 7.9% 3,928 384,446,000 37,550 2010 11,501 8.8% 3,932 410,252,171 35,715 2011 12,759 7.5% 4,011 422,820,501 36,212 2012 12,935 6.2% 4,044 477,596,640 38,517 2013 12,964 4.6% 4,016 502, 964,308 40,127 2014 12,993 3.8% 4,089 531,634,581 40,917 2015 13,125 3.7% 4,100 557,116,875 42,447 2016 13,299 4.3% 4,027 586, 525,797 44,103 Notes/sources: (1) 2010 U.S. Bureau of Census; 2006-2009 and 2011-2015 Minnesota State Demographic Center population estimates. (2) Annual average unemployment provided by the Minnesota Department of Employment & Economic Development. (3) ISD No. 882 enrollment information was obtained from the district audit report. The enrollment information is based on the resident ADMs (average daily membership) served. (4) This estimated personal income number is calculated by taking the per capita personal income and multiplying it by the city's population. Also see note (5) regarding the per capita personal income figures. (5) Per capita personal income data is provided by the Bureau of Economic Analysis. Monticello's estimates are based on Wright County information. Wright County, where Monticello is located, is the smallest, relevant statistical tracking area. Data is subject o annual revisions by the Bureau of Economic Analysis. 105 CITY OF MONTICELLO Principal Employers Current Year and Nine Years Ago Source: City of Monticello 2016A Bond Statement and 2007 Bond Statement (1) The city estimates its workforce by using the city's percentage of total county population and multiplying that number by the county's total workforce. 106 2016 2007 Percentage of Percentage of Total City Total City Employer Employees Rank Employment (1) Employees Rank Employment (1) Xcel Energy (Northern States) 700 1 9.9% 422 3 6.8% ISD No. 882 (Monticello) 544 2 7.7% 455 2 7.4% CentraCare Medical Center (New River) 500 3 7.1% 515 1 8.3% Cargill Kitchen Solutions (Sunny Fresh) 450 4 6.4% 396 4 6.4% Wal-Mart Supercenter 325 5 4.6% 325 5 5.3% Cub Foods 180 6 2.6% 122 9 2.0% Ultra Machine Corporation 173 7 2.5% 130 8 2.1% Home Depot 160 8 2.3% City of Monticello 150 9 2.1% 151 6 2.4% WSI Industries, Inc. 100 10 1.4% Denny Hecker Monticello 150 7 2.4% Monticello Clinic 98 10 1.6% 3,282 46.5% 2,764 44.8% Source: City of Monticello 2016A Bond Statement and 2007 Bond Statement (1) The city estimates its workforce by using the city's percentage of total county population and multiplying that number by the county's total workforce. 106 CITY OF MONTICELLO City Government Employees by Function/Program Last Ten Fiscal Years 107 Fiscal Year 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Employees by function General Fund General government 8.60 9.60 9.60 11.00 11.00 11.00 11.00 12.50 12.50 13.50 Public Safety Building Official 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 4.00 4.00 Public works Engineering 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Maintenance(1) 21.50 21.50 19.50 19.50 19.00 19.00 19.00 18.50 18.50 18.50 Culture and recreation Parks 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 Community development 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Special Revenue Funds Culture and recreation Community center -FT 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 7.50 7.50 7.50 Community center-PT(2) 36.50 36.50 36.50 36.50 36.50 36.50 36.50 36.50 36.50 36.50 Enterprise Funds Sewer/water 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 5.00 5.00 Deputy registrar(3) 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 Liquor store 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 11.50 11.50 11.50 FiberNet(4) - - 6.00 11.00 11.50 11.50 8.50 8.50 8.50 - Total 106.60 107.60 111.60 118.00 118.00 118.00 113.00 115.00 117.00 109.50 Employees by fund type General Fund 43.10 44.10 42.10 43.50 43.00 43.00 41.00 42.00 43.00 44.00 Special Revenue Funds 44.50 44.50 44.50 44.50 44.50 44.50 44.50 44.00 44.00 44.00 Enterprise Funds 19.00 19.00 25.00 30.00 30.50 30.50 27.50 29.00 30.00 21.50 106.60 107.60 111.60 118.00 118.00 118.00 113.00 115.00 117.00 109.50 Source: City of Monticello human resources department FT = Full-time PT = Part-time (1) Includes seasonal public works (2) Years 2007-2013 were estimated 2014 levels as data was not previously tracked. (3) Prior to 2013, the deputy registrar function was included with general government. Prior years were restated. (4) Management and operations were contracted beginning July 1, 2016. 107 CITY OF MONTICELLO Operating Indicators by Function Last Ten Fiscal Years 108 Fiscal Year 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Function Fire Calls for service 317 395 375 282 284 203 235 264 251 262 Public works Salt (tons) 274 474 475 521 445 300 475 385 534 370 Sand (tons) 347 611 615 710 547 335 325 600 285 202 Crack sealant (pounds) 14,200 18,150 15,000 23,580 11,384 1,492 25,739 23,282 29,580 49,039 Asphalt repairs (tons of asphalt) 330 200 200 200 253 220 225 190 293 220 Culture and recreation Shade trees planted 384 410 425 150 140 220 275 270 257 280 Diseased trees removed n/a 868 200 180 113 205 71 46 208 60 Trails maintained (miles) n/a 17 17 17 17 17 17 18 18 20 Community center users 168,923 186,429 186,279 183,527 190,014 175,272 211,234 204,134 199,228 197,523 Program sales $ 88,412 $ 129,339 $ 149,829 $ 167,723 $ 168,159 $ 162,227 $ 192,708 $ 184,125 $ 213,924 $ 193,628 Rental revenue $ 139,096 $ 136,547 $ 127,612 $ 184,913 $ 154,962 $ 149,733 $ 163,329 $ 150,964 $ 154,938 $ 168,353 Economic development Permits issued 962 3,681 879 495 372 632 659 721 768 802 Permit valuation $45,917,000 $45,950,000 $11,630,000 $ 9,033,078 $ 5,333,124 $12,285,873 $15,821,223 $19,714,895 $36,242,742 $59,426,683 New single-family dwellings 43 20 9 2 2 22 52 72 44 61 Water Meters/remotes replaced 94 111 280 145 215 418 235 598 694 991 Curb box repairs (water valves) 50 75 200 200 200 100 100 100 100 100 Hydrant repair 175 175 175 175 430 300 300 203 430 250 Residential water gallons used 467,673,488 409,879,658 430,263,791 376,687,840 348,580,072 426,358,402 383,079,041 328,835,772 325,188,041 329,068,876 Avg. daily consumption (MG) 1.921 1.749 1.806 1.625 1.557 1.798 1.621 1.400 1.308 1.419 Max. daily gallons pumped (MG) 5.150 4.728 4.496 3.565 4.116 4.590 4.269 4.031 3.203 3.450 Sewer Sewage flow (MG) 423 408 390 398 431 408 392 435 417 432 Thickened sludge (wet tons) n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1,924 1,549 1,449 Thickened sludge (dry tons) n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 264 236 216 Dry tons as % of wet tons n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 13.7% 15.2% 14.9% Library Items checked out 209,174 216,599 219,694 248,327 228,886 237,938 263,220 199,182 195,235 190,433 Programs offered 145 155 170 164 153 149 173 169 167 212 Program participants 3,537 3,869 4,100 3,604 3,807 3,761 3,773 3,788 3,919 4,306 (continued) 108 Operating Indicators by Function Last Ten Fiscal Years (continued) Fiber optics Customers Service subscriptions TV customers Phone customers Internet customers Liquor store Transactions Average liquor sale transaction Beer sales Liquor sales Wine sales Gross profit margin % - beer Gross profit margin % - liquor Gross profit margin % - wine Deputy registrar (DMV) Motor vehicle transactions DNR transactions Game/fish transactions Drivers licenses transactions Total transactions Dealerships serviced Net revenue per transaction CITY OF MONTICELLO N/A = Not Available MG = Millions of Gallons Note: Indicators are not available for the general government function. Sources: Various city departments 109 Fiscal Year 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1,539 1,574 1,630 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2,755 2,656 2,589 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 813 714 641 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 582 518 461 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1,360 1,424 1,487 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 229,236 237,535 235,901 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a $ 21.90 $ 22.42 $ 22.39 n/a $ 2,066,537 $ 2,187,948 $ 2,289,801 $ 2,328,735 $ 2,483,194 $ 2,539,168 $ 2,604,942 $ 2,763,478 $ 2,768,394 n/a $ 1,129,351 $ 1,214,817 $ 1,251,448 $ 1,343,109 $ 1,396,521 $ 1,506,776 $ 1,546,118 $ 1,634,198 $ 1,624,908 n/a $ 492,183 $ 575,521 $ 657,562 $ 748,908 $ 812,832 $ 860,817 $ 868,779 $ 927,732 $ 889,082 n/a 20.7% 15.7% 20.4% 19.1% 20.3% 22.5% 21.4% 25.6% 21.1% n/a 23.9% 26.8% 29.6% 28.0% 29.3% 27.7% 30.3% 29.8% 29.0% n/a 17.0% 20.2% 26.8% 28.5% 31.4% 29.7% 30.7% 31.5% 32.5% 40,950 45,595 48,000 51,250 54,814 56,211 55,261 60,051 64,927 67,508 5,580 5,913 5,646 5,982 5,616 5,465 5,727 5,949 5,914 6,318 167 235 250 156 325 509 445 433 387 600 n/a n/a 450 605 579 814 951 1,462 1,294 1,465 46,697 51,743 54,346 57,993 61,334 62,999 62,384 67,895 72,522 75,891 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 19 19 19 21 n/a n/a n/a n/a $ 1.71 $ 2.75 $ 2.68 $ 2.91 $ 3.02 $ 3.05 N/A = Not Available MG = Millions of Gallons Note: Indicators are not available for the general government function. Sources: Various city departments 109 CITY OF MONTICELLO Capital Assets Statistics by Function Last Ten Fiscal Years Note: No capital asset indicators are available for the general government and economic development functions. Note: The city contributed jointly -owned land at the Bertram Chain of Lakes to Wright County in 2015. Source: Various city departments 110 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Function Public safety Fire Fire stations in service 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Number of volunteers 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 Public works Streets (miles) 67.6 67.6 68.0 68.0 68.0 68.0 68.0 68.0 68.0 68.0 Recreation and culture Parks acreage - 120 180 509 635 635 696 860 326 367 Parks 19 20 20 28 28 28 28 30 30 30 Park buildings 9 10 11 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 Community center (sq. ft.) 81,000 81,000 81,000 81,000 81,000 81,000 82,000 82,000 82,000 82,000 Water Fire hydrants 700 700 700 700 700 700 700 700 700 700 Note: No capital asset indicators are available for the general government and economic development functions. Note: The city contributed jointly -owned land at the Bertram Chain of Lakes to Wright County in 2015. Source: Various city departments 110 Ir- O�Kw'-Jo-- 43k -0 lojo, Arm, Ab& 4p *q%w V VL 4 Ilk .0 09 ..A CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA Special Purpose Audit Reports on Single Audit, Internal Controls, and Compliance With Laws and Regulations Year Ended December 31, 2016 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA Table of Contents Page Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Independent Auditor's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting and on Compliance and Other Matters Based on an Audit of Financial Statements Performed in Accordance with Government Auditing Standards 2-3 Independent Auditor's Report on Compliance for Each Major Federal Program; Report on Internal Control Over Compliance; and Report on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Required by the Uniform Guidance 4-6 Independent Auditor's Report on Minnesota Legal Compliance 7 Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs 8-11 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK CITY OF MONTICELLO Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Year Ended December 31, 2016 Federal Federal Federal Grantor/Pass-Through Grantor/Program Title CFDA No. Expenditures U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Passed through Minnesota Public Facilities Authority Capitalization Grants for Clean Water State Revolving Funds 66.458 $ 1,413,064 U.S. Department of Transportation Passed through Minnesota Department of Transportation Highway Planning and Construction 20.205 579,445 Total federal awards $ 1,992,509 Note 1: The Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards is prepared on the accrual basis of accounting. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with both OMB Circular A-133, Audits of States, Local Governments, and Nonprofit Organizations and the OMB's Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, when applicable. Therefore, some amounts presented in this schedule may differ from the amounts presented in, or used in the preparation of, the City's basic financial statements. Note 2: All pass-through entities listed above use the same CFDA numbers as the federal grantors to identify these grants, and have not assigned any additional identifying numbers. Note 3: The City did not elect to use the 10 percent de minimus indirect cost rate. -1- THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK PRINCIPAIS Thomas A. Karnowski, CPA Paul A. Radosevich, CPA KR William J. Lauer, CPA James H. Eichten, CPA C E RT I F I E D PUBLIC Aaron J. Nielsen, CPA ACCOUNTANTS Victoria L. Holinka, CPA/CMA INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING AND ON COMPLIANCE AND OTHER MATTERS BASED ON AN AUDIT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS PERFORMED IN FA400 7m - [ ./_YY`__[e��]%�1 �1► �I�[�117�_Y_I�[e;�.y11I:�� 7D I To the City Council and Management City of Monticello, Minnesota We have audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, the financial statements of the governmental activities, the business -type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City of Monticello, Minnesota (the City) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016, and the related notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the City's basic financial statements, and have issued our report thereon dated June 20, 2017. INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements, we considered the City's internal control over financial reporting (internal control) to determine the audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances for the purpose of expressing our opinions on the financial statements, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the City's internal control. Accordingly, we do not express an opinion on the effectiveness of the City's internal control. A deficiency in internal control exists when the design or operation of a control does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or detect and correct, misstatements on a timely basis. A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the City's financial statements will not be prevented, or detected and corrected, on a timely basis. A significant deficiency is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control that is less severe than a material weakness, yet important enough to merit attention by those charged with governance. Our consideration of internal control was for the limited purpose described in the first paragraph of this section and was not designed to identify all deficiencies in internal control that might be material weaknesses or significant deficiencies. Given these limitations, during our audit we did not identify any deficiencies in internal control that we consider to be material weaknesses. However, material weaknesses may exist that have not been identified. (continued) -2- Malloy, Montague, Karnowski, Radosevich & Co., P.A. 5353 Wayzata Boulevard • Suite 410 • Minneapolis, MN 55416 • Phone: 952-545-0424 • Fax: 952-545-0569 • www.mmkr.com COMPLIANCE AND OTHER MATTERS As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the City's financial statements are free from material misstatement, we performed tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements, noncompliance with which could have a direct and material effect on the determination of financial statement amounts. However, providing an opinion on compliance with those provisions was not an objective of our audit and, accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. The results of our tests disclosed no instances of noncompliance or other matters that are required to be reported under Government Auditing Standards. PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT The purpose of this report is solely to describe the scope of our testing of internal control and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the effectiveness of the City's internal control or on compliance. This report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards in considering the City's internal control and compliance. Accordingly, this report is not suitable for any other purpose. WW,07,, WakAr, Minneapolis, Minnesota June 20, 2017 -3- M KR CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT ON COMPLIANCE FOR PRINCIPALS Thomas A. Karnowski, CPA Paul A. Radosevich, CPA William J. Lauer, CPA James H. Eichten, CPA Aaron J. Nielsen, CPA Victoria L. Holinka, CPA/CMA EACH MAJOR FEDERAL PROGRAM, REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER COMPLIANCE, AND REPORT ON THE SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES OF FEDERAL AWARDS REOUIRED BY THE UNIFORM GUIDANCE To the City Council and Management City of Monticello, Minnesota REPORT ON COMPLIANCE FOR EACH MAJOR FEDERAL PROGRAM We have audited the City of Monticello, Minnesota's (the City) compliance with the types of compliance requirements described in the U.S. Office of Management and Budget Compliance Supplement that could have a direct and material effect on each of the City's major federal programs for the year ended December 31, 2016. The City's major federal programs are identified in the summary of auditor's results section of the accompanying Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs. MANAGEMENT'S RESPONSIBILITY Management is responsible for compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of its federal awards applicable to its federal programs. AUDITOR'S RESPONSIBILITY Our responsibility is to express an opinion on compliance for each of the City's major federal programs based on our audit of the types of compliance requirements referred to above. We conducted our audit of compliance in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America; the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States; and the audit requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Those standards and the Uniform Guidance require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether noncompliance with the types of compliance requirements referred to above that could have a direct and material effect on a major federal program occurred. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence about the City's compliance with those requirements and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion on compliance for each major federal program. However, our audit does not provide a legal determination of the City's compliance. (continued) -4- Malloy, Montague, Karnowski, Radosevich & Co., P.A. 5353 Wayzata Boulevard • Suite 410 • Minneapolis, MN 55416 • Phone: 952-545-0424 • Fax: 952-545-0569 • www.mmkr.com BASIS FOR QUALIFIED OPINION ON THE CAPITALIZATION GRANTS FOR CLEAN WATER STATE REVOLVING FUNDS As described in the accompanying Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs, the City did not comply with requirements regarding Capitalization Grants for Clean Water State Revolving Funds procurement requirements, reported as finding 2016-001. Compliance with such requirements is necessary, in our opinion, for the City to comply with the requirements applicable to that program. QUALIFIED OPINION ON THE CAPITALIZATION GRANTS FOR CLEAN WATER STATE REVOLVING FUNDS In our opinion, except for the noncompliance described in the Basis for Qualified Opinion paragraph, the City complied, in all material respects, with the types of compliance requirements referred to on the previous page that could have a direct and material effect on the Capitalization Grants for the Clean Water State Revolving Funds Program for the year ended December 31, 2016. CITY'S RESPONSE TO QUALIFIED OPINION The City's response to the noncompliance finding identified in our audit is described in the accompanying Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs. The City's response was not subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of compliance and, accordingly, we express no opinion on it. REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER COMPLIANCE Management of the City is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over compliance with the types of compliance requirements referred to above. In planning and performing our audit of compliance, we considered the City's internal control over compliance with the types of requirements that could have a direct and material effect on each major federal program to determine the auditing procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances for the purpose of expressing an opinion on compliance for each major federal program and to test and report on internal control over compliance in accordance with the Uniform Guidance, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of internal control over compliance. Accordingly, we do not express an opinion on the effectiveness of the City's internal control over compliance. A deficiency in internal control over compliance exists when the design or operation of a control over compliance does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or detect and correct, noncompliance with a type of compliance requirement of a federal program on a timely basis. A material weakness in internal control over compliance is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over compliance, such that there is a reasonable possibility that material noncompliance with a type of compliance requirement of a federal program will not be prevented, or detected and corrected, on a timely basis. A significant deficiency in internal control over compliance is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over compliance with a type of compliance requirement of a federal program that is less severe than a material weakness in internal control over compliance, yet important enough to merit attention by those charged with governance. Our consideration of internal control over compliance was for the limited purpose described in the first paragraph of this section and was not designed to identify all deficiencies in internal control over compliance that might be material weaknesses or significant deficiencies. We did not identify any deficiencies in internal control over compliance that we consider to be material weaknesses. However, we identified two deficiencies in internal control over compliance, as described in the accompanying Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs as items 2016-001 and 2016-002, that we consider to be significant deficiencies. (continued) 511 CITY'S RESPONSES TO FINDINGS The City's responses to the internal control over compliance findings identified in our audit are described in the accompanying Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs. The City's responses were not subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of compliance and, accordingly, we express no opinion on the responses. PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT The purpose of this report on internal control over compliance is solely to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over compliance and the results of that testing based on the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Accordingly, this report is not suitable for any other purpose. REPORT ON SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES OF FEDERAL AWARDS REQUIRED BY THE UNIFORM GUIDANCE We have audited the financial statements of the governmental activities, the business -type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016, and the related notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the City's basic financial statements. We issued our report thereon dated June 20, 2017, which contained unmodified opinions on those financial statements. Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming opinions on the financial statements that collectively comprise the basic financial statements. The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards is presented for purposes of additional analysis as required by the Uniform Guidance and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information is the responsibility of management and was derived from and relates directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the basic financial statements. The information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the financial statements and certain additional procedures, including comparing and reconciling such information directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the basic financial statements or to the basic financial statements themselves, and other additional procedures in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. In our opinion, the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the basic financial statements as a whole. WW107" /'"( per.. " ��iJLtti� L[ Minneapolis, Minnesota June 20, 2017 -6- THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK M KR CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT ON MINNESOTA LEGAL COMPLIANCE To the City Council and Management City of Monticello, Minnesota PRINCIPAIS Thomas A. Karnowski, CPA Paul A. Radosevich, CPA William J. Lauer, CPA James H. Eichten, CPA Aaron J. Nielsen, CPA Victoria L. Holinka, CPA/CMA We have audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, the financial statements of the governmental activities, the business -type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City of Monticello, Minnesota (the City) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016, and the related notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the City's basic financial statements, and have issued our report thereon dated June 20, 2017. MINNESOTA LEGAL COMPLIANCE The Minnesota Legal Compliance Audit Guide for Cities, promulgated by the State Auditor pursuant to Minnesota Statutes § 6.65, contains seven categories of compliance to be tested: contracting and bidding, deposits and investments, conflicts of interest, public indebtedness, claims and disbursements, miscellaneous provisions, and tax increment financing. Our audit considered all of the listed categories. In connection with our audit, nothing came to our attention that caused us to believe that the City failed to comply with the provisions of the Minnesota Legal Compliance Audit Guide for Cities. However, our audit was not directed primarily toward obtaining knowledge of such noncompliance. Accordingly, had we performed additional procedures, other matters may have come to our attention regarding the City's noncompliance with the above referenced provisions. PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT The purpose of this report is solely to describe the scope of our testing of compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on compliance. Accordingly, this report is not suitable for any other purpose. Minneapolis, Minnesota June 20, 2017 -7- Malloy, Montague, Karnowski, Radosevich & Co., P.A. 5353 Wayzata Boulevard • Suite 410 • Minneapolis, MN 55416 • Phone: 952-545-0424 • Fax: 952-545-0569 • www.mmkr.com THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK CITY OF MONTICELLO Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs Year Ended December 31, 2016 A. SUMMARY OF AUDIT RESULTS This summary is formatted to provide federal granting agencies and pass-through agencies answers to specific questions regarding the audit of federal awards. Financial Statements What type of auditor's report is issued? X Unmodified Qualified Adverse Disclaimer Internal control over financial reporting: Material weakness(es) identified? Yes X No Significant deficiency(ies) identified? Yes X None reported Noncompliance material to the financial statements noted? Yes X No Federal Awards Internal controls over major federal award programs: Material weakness(es) identified? Yes X No Significant deficiency(ies) identified? X Yes None reported Type of auditor's report issued on compliance for major programs? Unmodified X Qualified Adverse Disclaimer Any audit findings disclosed that are required to be reported in accordance with the Uniform Guidance? X Yes No Programs tested as major programs: Program or Cluster CFDA No. U.S. Environment Protection Agency Capitalization Grants for Clean Water State Revolving Funds 66.458 Threshold for distinguishing between type A and B programs $ 750,000 Does the auditee qualify as a low-risk auditee? Yes X No CITY OF MONTICELLO Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) Year Ended December 31, 2016 B. FINANCIAL STATEMENT FINDINGS None. C. FEDERAL AWARD FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER COMPLIANCE AND NONCOMPLIANCE - CAPITALIZATION GRANTS FOR CLEAN WATER STATE REVOLVING FUNDS - CFDA NO. 66.458 2016-001 Internal Controls Over Compliance With Procurement Requirements Criteria — 2 CFR § 1500.10 requires that if the City of Monticello, Minnesota (the City) is satisfied with the qualifications and performance of the architect or engineer who provided any or all of the facilities planning or design services for the Wastewater Treatment Works Project, and wishes to retain that firm or individual during construction of the project, the City may do so without further public notice and evaluation of qualifications, provided the City follows one of three acceptable exceptions. Condition — During our audit, we noted that the City did not obtain the necessary Environment Protection Agency exception documentation in order to continue using the same architect or engineer during construction under the Capitalization Grants for Clean Water State Revolving Funds agreement. Questioned Costs — None. Context — The lack of exception documentation pertains to the Capitalization Grants for Clean Water State Revolving Funds. This was not a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding — This is a current year finding only. Cause — The City did not adequately document one of the acceptable exceptions for choosing to use the same architect or engineer who provided facilities planning or design services and for construction under the Capitalization Grants for Clean Water State Revolving Funds. Effect — This could be viewed as a violation of the award agreement. Recommendation — We recommend that the City review its internal control procedures relating to procurement for the Capitalization Grants for Clean Water State Revolving Funds to ensure proper compliance with this requirement in the future. View of Responsible Official and Planned Corrective Actions — The City agrees with the finding. The City is in the process of reviewing internal controls in place for procurement requirements to ensure compliance with Uniform Guidance in the future. The City has separately issued a Corrective Action Plan related to this finding. In CITY OF MONTICELLO Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) Year Ended December 31, 2016 C. FEDERAL AWARD FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (CONTINUED) SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER COMPLIANCE - CAPITALIZATION GRANTS FOR CLEAN WATER STATE REVOLVING FUNDS - CFDA NO. 66.458 2016-002 Internal Controls Over Compliance With Cash Management, Allowable Costs, Procurement Standards, and Standards of Conduct for Conflicts of Interest Criteria — 2 CFR § 200.302(b)(6) and (7) requires the City to have written cash management procedures, which includes procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with 2 CFR 200 Subpart E — Cost Principles. 2 CFR § 200.318(a) requires the City to have written procurement procedures which reflect applicable federal law. 2 CFR § 200.318(c) and 48 CFR § 52.203-13 requires the City to have written standards of conduct that cover conflicts of interest and govern the performance of its employees in the selection, award, and administration of contracts. Condition — During our audit, we noted that the City did not have documented written controls to ensure compliance with the U.S. Office of Management and Budget's (OMB) Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) cash management, allowable costs, procurement standards, and standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest. Questioned Costs — None. Our testing did not indicate any instances of noncompliance. Context — The lack of written controls pertains to the Capitalization Grants for Clean Water State Revolving Funds. This was not a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding — This is a current year finding only. Cause — This is the first year of implementation of the new Uniform Guidance requirements for federal awards, and some internal control policies, including cash management, allowable costs, procurement, and conflicts of interest were not updated to reflect the necessary changes. Effect — This could be viewed as a violation of the award agreement. Recommendation — We recommend that the City review its internal control procedures relating to cash management, allowable costs, procurement, and conflicts of interest for the Capitalization Grants for Clean Water State Revolving Funds. The City should review the new Uniform Guidance to obtain a better understanding of the new requirements and identify any needed policy and procedure changes, in addition to those already referenced above. We also recommend the City adopt written policies pertaining to cash management, allowable costs, procurement, and conflicts of interest for the Capitalization Grants for Clean Water State Revolving Funds. -10- CITY OF MONTICELLO Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) Year Ended December 31, 2016 C. FEDERAL AWARD FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (CONTINUED) SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER COMPLIANCE - CAPITALIZATION GRANTS FOR CLEAN WATER STATE REVOLVING FUNDS - CFDA NO. 66.458 (CONTINUED) 2016-002 Internal Controls Over Compliance With Cash Management, Allowable Costs, Procurement Standards, and Standards of Conduct for Conflicts of Interest (continued) View of Responsible Official and Planned Corrective Actions — The City agrees with the finding. The City is in the process of reviewing and updating its written policies and procedures relating to cash management, allowable costs, procurement, and conflict of interest standards for its federal programs to ensure compliance with Uniform Guidance in the future. The City has separately issued a Corrective Action Plan related to this finding. D. MINNESOTA LEGAL COMPLIANCE FINDINGS None. -11- CITY OF MONTICELLO Corrective Action Plans and Summary Schedule of Prior Audit Findings Year Ended December 31, 2016 A. FINANCIAL STATEMENT FINDINGS None. B. FEDERAL AWARD FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER COMPLIANCE AND NONCOMPLIANCE - CAPITALIZATION GRANTS FOR CLEAN WATER STATE REVOLVING FUNDS - CFDA NO. 66.458 2016-001 Internal Controls Over Compliance With Procurement Requirements Finding Summary 2 CFR § 1500.10 requires that if the City of Monticello, Minnesota (the City) is satisfied with the qualifications and performance of the architect or engineer who provided any or all of the facilities planning or design services for the Wastewater Treatment Works Project, and wishes to retain that firm or individual during construction of the project, the City may do so without further public notice and evaluation of qualifications, provided the City follows one of three acceptable exceptions. During our audit, we noted that the City did not obtain the necessary Environment Protection Agency exception documentation in order to continue using the same architect or engineer during construction under the Capitalization Grants for Clean Water State Revolving Funds agreement. Corrective Action Plan Actions Planned — The City is in the process of reviewing internal controls in place for procurement requirements to ensure compliance with Uniform Guidance in the future. Official Responsible — The City's Finance Director. Planned Completion Date — December 31, 2017. Disagreement With or Explanation of Finding — The City agrees with this finding. Plan to Monitor — The City's Finance Director will assure appropriate internal controls and procedures are effectively implemented and followed for future federal grants. -1- CITY OF MONTICELLO Corrective Action Plans and Summary Schedule of Prior Audit Findings (continued) Year Ended December 31, 2016 B. FEDERAL AWARD FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (CONTINUED) SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER COMPLIANCE - CAPITALIZATION GRANTS FOR CLEAN WATER STATE REVOLVING FUNDS - CFDA NO. 66.458 2016-002 Internal Controls Over Compliance With Cash Management, Allowable Costs, Procurement Standards, and Standards of Conduct for Conflicts of Interest Finding Summary 2 CFR § 200.302(b)(6) and (7) requires the City to have written cash management procedures, which includes procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with 2 CFR 200 Subpart E — Cost Principles. 2 CFR 200.318(a) requires the City to have written procurement procedures which reflect applicable federal law. 2 CFR § 200.318(c) and 48 CFR § 52.203-13 requires the City to have written standards of conduct that cover conflicts of interest and govern the performance of its employees in the selection, award, and administration of contracts. The City did not have documented written controls to ensure compliance with the U.S. Office of Management and Budget's Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) cash management, allowable costs, procurement standards, and standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest. Corrective Action Plan Actions Planned — The City is in the process of reviewing and updating its written policies and procedures relating to cash management, allowable costs, procurement, and standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest for its federal programs to ensure compliance with Uniform Guidance in the future. Official Responsible — The City's Finance Director. Planned Completion Date — December 31, 2017. Disagreement With or Explanation of Finding — The City agrees with this finding. Plan to Monitor — The City's Finance Director will assure appropriate written internal controls and procedures are updated and in place for future federal grants. -2- CITY OF MONTICELLO Corrective Action Plans and Summary Schedule of Prior Audit Findings (continued) Year Ended December 31, 2016 C. MINNESOTA LEGAL COMPLIANCE FINDINGS None. D. SUMMARY SCHEDULE OF PRIOR AUDIT FINDINGS No findings were reported in the prior year. -3- Management Report for City of Monticello, Minnesota December 31, 2016 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK M KR CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS To the City Council and Management City of Monticello, Minnesota PRINCIPALS Thomas A. Karnowski, CPA Paul A. Radosevich, CPA William J. Lauer, CPA James H. Eichten, CPA Aaron J. Nielsen, CPA Victoria L. Holinka, CPA/CMA We have prepared this management report in conjunction with our audit of the City of Monticello, Minnesota's (the City) financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2016. We have organized this report into the following sections: • Audit Summary • Governmental Funds Overview • Enterprise Funds Overview • Government -Wide Financial Statements • Legislative Updates • Accounting and Auditing Updates We would be pleased to further discuss any of the information contained in this report or any other concerns that you would like us to address. We would also like to express our thanks for the courtesy and assistance extended to us during the course of our audit. The purpose of this report is solely to provide those charged with governance of the City, management, and those who have responsibility for oversight of the financial reporting process comments resulting from our audit process and information relevant to city finances in Minnesota. Accordingly, this report is not suitable for any other purpose. Minneapolis, Minnesota June 20, 2017 Malloy, Montague, Karnowski, Radosevich & Co., P.A. 5353 Wayzata Boulevard • Suite 410 • Minneapolis, MN 55416 • Phone: 952-545-0424 • Fax: 952-545-0569 • www.mmkr.com THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK AUDIT SUMMARY The following is a summary of our audit work, key conclusions, and other information that we consider important or that is required to be communicated to the City Council, administration, or those charged with governance of the City. OUR RESPONSIBILITY UNDER AUDITING STANDARDS GENERALLY ACCEPTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS, AND TITLE 2 U.S. CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS (CFR) PART 200, UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS, COST PRINCIPLES, AND AUDIT REQUIREMENTS FOR FEDERAL AWARDS (UNIFORM GUIDANCE We have audited the financial statements of the governmental activities, the business -type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016, and the related notes to the financial statements. Professional standards require that we provide you with information about our responsibilities under auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, Government Auditing Standards, and the Uniform Guidance, as well as certain information related to the planned scope and timing of our audit. We have communicated such information to you verbally and in our audit engagement letter. Professional standards also require that we communicate the following information related to our audit. PLANNED SCOPE AND TIMING OF THE AUDIT We performed the audit according to the planned scope and timing previously discussed and coordinated in order to obtain sufficient audit evidence and complete an effective audit. AUDIT OPINION AND FINDINGS Based on our audit of the City's financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2016: • We have issued an unmodified opinion on the City's basic financial statements. • We reported no deficiencies in the City's internal control over financial reporting that we considered to be material weaknesses. • The results of our testing disclosed no instances of noncompliance required to be reported under Government Auditing Standards. • We reported that the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the basic financial statements. • The results of our tests noted one instance of noncompliance with requirements that could have a direct and material effect on the City's major federal program: o During our audit, we noted one instance of noncompliance with procurement requirements in which the City did not obtain the necessary Environmental Protection Agency exception documentation in order to continue use of the same architect or engineer during construction under the Capitalization Grants for Clean Water State Revolving Funds agreement. This is also considered a significant deficiency in internal controls as the City did not have adequate controls in place to ensure proper compliance with these requirements. -1- We reported one additional matter involving the internal controls over compliance and its operation that we consider to be significant deficiencies in our testing of major federal programs: o During our audit, we noted that the City did not have documented written controls to ensure compliance with the U.S. Office of Management and Budget's Uniform Guidance cash management, allowable costs, procurement, and conflict of interest standards. • We reported no findings based on our testing of the City's compliance with Minnesota laws and regulations. GENERAL COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Inventory Reconciliation The City operates its liquor store inventory on a perpetual basis and completes an annual inventory count in January after year-end. For the year ended December 31, 2016, the City experienced a significant write-down of inventory to reconcile to what was on hand in the count. The size of this adjustment has increased over the last few years, causing us to have concerns that internal controls over inventory costing are not operating effectively enough to mitigate material year-end adjustments. We recommend the City review its policies and procedures over valuing and monitoring its inventory on a first -in first -out cost basis, improve its internal controls over recording inventory values, and continue to monitor overall inventory activity in the future to ensure inventory is properly recorded and valued at year-end. Untimely Reporting to the Minnesota Public Facilities Authority The City is required to submit a copy of its annual audit report to the public facilities authority within 30 days of the report date. We noted during our audit, that the audit report for the year ended December 31, 2015 was not submitted until 80 days after the audit report date. We recommend the City review its internal controls over grant agreements to ensure compliance with the reporting requirements of all grants. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Management is responsible for the selection and use of appropriate accounting policies. The significant accounting policies used by the City are described in Note 1 of the notes to basic financial statements. No new accounting policies were adopted and the application of existing policies was not changed during the year ended December 31, 2016. We noted no transactions entered into by the City during the year for which there is a lack of authoritative guidance or consensus. All significant transactions have been recognized in the financial statements in the proper period. ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES AND MANAGEMENT JUDGMENTS Accounting estimates are an integral part of the financial statements prepared by management and are based on management's knowledge and experience about past and current events and assumptions about future events. Certain accounting estimates are particularly sensitive because of their significance to the financial statements and because of the possibility that future events affecting them may differ significantly from those expected. The most sensitive estimates affecting the financial statements were: • Depreciation — Management's estimates of depreciation expense are based on the estimated useful lives of the assets. -2- • Other Post -Employment Benefit (OPEB) and Pension Liabilities — These obligations are calculated using actuarial methodologies described in Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement Nos. 45 and 68. These actuarial calculations include significant assumptions, including projected changes, healthcare insurance costs, investment returns, retirement ages, proportionate share, and employee turnover. • Land Held for Resale — These assets are stated at fair value based on management's estimates. • Compensated Absences — Management's estimate is based on current rates of pay and sick leave balances. • Allowance for Doubtful Accounts — Management's estimate of the allowance for doubtful accounts is based on historical revenues, historical loss levels, and an analysis of the collectability of individual accounts. We evaluated the key factors and assumptions used by management to develop these estimates in determining that they are reasonable in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The financial statement disclosures are neutral, consistent, and clear. DIFFICULTIES ENCOUNTERED IN PERFORMING THE AUDIT We encountered no significant difficulties in dealing with management in performing and completing our audit. CORRECTED AND UNCORRECTED MISSTATEMENTS Professional standards require us to accumulate all known and likely misstatements identified during the audit, other than those that are clearly trivial, and communicate them to the appropriate level of management. Where applicable, management has corrected all such misstatements. In addition, none of the misstatements detected as a result of audit procedures and corrected by management, when applicable, were material, either individually or in the aggregate, to each opinion unit's financial statements taken as a whole. DISAGREEMENTS WITH MANAGEMENT For purposes of this report, professional standards define a disagreement with management as a financial accounting, reporting, or auditing matter, whether or not resolved to our satisfaction, that could be significant to the financial statements or the auditor's report. We are pleased to report that no such disagreements arose during the course of our audit. MANAGEMENT REPRESENTATIONS We have requested certain representations from management that are included in the management representation letter dated June 20, 2017. MANAGEMENT CONSULTATIONS WITH OTHER INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS In some cases, management may decide to consult with other accountants about auditing and accounting matters, similar to obtaining a "second opinion" on certain situations. If a consultation involves application of an accounting principle to the City's financial statements or a determination of the type of auditor's opinion that may be expressed on those statements, our professional standards require the consulting accountant to check with us to determine that the consultant has all the relevant facts. To our knowledge, there were no such consultations with other accountants. -3- OTHER AUDIT FINDINGS OR ISSUES We generally discuss a variety of matters, including the application of accounting principles and auditing standards, with management each year prior to retention as the City's auditors. However, these discussions occurred in the normal course of our professional relationship and our responses were not a condition to our retention. OTHER MATTERS We applied certain limited procedures to the management's discussion and analysis, the budgetary comparison schedules, and the pension and OPEB-related required supplementary information (RSI) that supplements the basic financial statements. Our procedures consisted of inquiries of management regarding the methods of preparing the information and comparing the information for consistency with management's responses to our inquiries, the basic financial statements, and other knowledge we obtained during our audit of the basic financial statements. We did not audit the RSI and do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on the RSI. We were engaged to report on the combining and individual fund statements and schedules accompanying the financial statements and the separately issued Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards, which are not RSI. With respect to this supplementary information, we made certain inquiries of management and evaluated the form, content, and methods of preparing the information to determine that the information complies with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, the method of preparing it has not changed from the prior period, and the information is appropriate and complete in relation to our audit of the financial statements. We compared and reconciled the supplementary information to the underlying accounting records used to prepare the financial statements or to the financial statements themselves. We were not engaged to report on the introductory and statistical sections, which accompany the financial statements, but are not RSI. Such information has not been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, accordingly, we do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on it. -4- GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS OVERVIEW This section of the report provides you with an overview of the financial trends and activities of the City's governmental funds, which includes the General, special revenue, debt service, and capital project funds. These funds are used to account for the basic services the City provides to all of its citizens, which are financed primarily with property taxes. The governmental fund information in the City's financial statements focuses on budgetary compliance and the sufficiency of each governmental fund's current assets to finance its current liabilities. PROPERTY TAXES Minnesota cities rely heavily on local property tax levies to support their governmental fund activities. For the 2015 fiscal year, local ad valorem property tax levies provided 39.8 percent of the total governmental fund revenues for cities over 2,500 in population, and 35.6 percent for cities under 2,500 in population. Property tax levies certified by Minnesota cities for 2016 increased about 4.8 percent over 2015, compared to an increase of 4.0 percent the prior year. The total market value of property in Minnesota cities increased about 5.7 percent for the 2016 levy year. While the percentage of market value growth was less than the 8.5 percent increase for levy year 2015, it was considerably larger than the 1.1 percent growth experienced in levy year 2014. Market values increased across all property categories for 2016, with gains in the market values of nonhomestead residential properties (9.1 percent) and other properties (7.3 percent) outpacing the market value gain of residential homestead properties (5.0 percent), commercial/industrial properties (4.9 percent), and farms (0.1 percent). The market values used for levying property taxes are based on the previous fiscal year (e.g., market values for taxes levied in 2016 were based on assessed values as of January 1, 2015), so the trend of change in these market values lags somewhat behind the housing market and economy in general. The City's taxable market value increased 26.0 percent for taxes payable in 2015 and 13.1 percent for taxes payable in 2016. The following graph shows the City's changes in taxable market value over the past 10 years: $1,800,000,000 $1,600,000,000 $1,400,000,000 $1,200,000,000 $1,000,000,000 $800,000,000 $600,000,000 $400,000,000 $200,000,000 Taxable Market Value 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 -5- Tax capacity is considered the actual base available for taxation. It is calculated by applying the state's property classification system to each property's market value. Each property classification, such as commercial or residential, has a different calculation and uses different rates. Consequently, a city's total tax capacity will change at a different rate than its total market value, as tax capacity is affected by the proportion of the City's tax base that is in each property classification from year-to-year, as well as legislative changes to tax rates. The City's tax capacity for taxes payable in 2015 increased 29.6 percent and 7.8 percent in 2016. The following graph shows the City's change in tax capacities over the past 10 years: $27,500,000 $25,000,000 $22,500,000 $20,000,000 $17,500,000 $15,000,000 $12,500,000 $10,000,000 $7,500,000 $5,000,000 $2,500,000 Local Tax Capacity 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 The City's portion of the average state-wide tax rates for 2016 showed a small decrease from the prior year, as levy increases were offset by improvements in property tax capacities. The following table presents the average tax rates applied to city residents for each of the last two levy years, along with comparative state-wide rates: Rates expressed as a percentage of net tax capacity All Cities State -Wide City of Monticello 2015 2016 2015 2016 Average tax rate City 46.9 46.5 35.7 34.5 County 44.7 44.1 40.6 40.0 School 27.1 27.5 22.9 20.9 Special taxing 6.9 6.9 — 1.1 Total 125.6 125.0 99.2 96.5 Average tax rates have been below state-wide averages for the last few years as a result of improved market values and tax capacities. The increase in market values and local tax capacity in 2015 and 2016 is related to significant increases to market values at the Xcel Power Plant. 10 GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS REVENUE AND EXPENDITURES The following table presents the per capita revenue of the City's governmental funds for the past three years, along with state-wide averages. We have included the most recent comparative state-wide averages available from the Office of the State Auditor to provide a benchmark for interpreting the City's data. The amounts received from the typical major sources of governmental fund revenue will naturally vary between cities based on factors such as a city's stage of development, location, size and density of its population, property values, services it provides, and other attributes. It will also differ from year-to-year due to the effect of inflation and changes in its operation. Also, certain data in these tables may be classified differently than how they appear in the City's financial statements in order to be more comparable to the state-wide information, particularly in separating capital expenditures from current expenditures. We have designed this section of our management report using per capita data in order to better identify unique or unusual trends and activities of the City. We intend for this type of comparative and trend information to complement, rather than duplicate, information in the management's discussion and analysis. An inherent difficulty in presenting per capita information is the accuracy of the population count, which for most years is based on estimates. Governmental Funds Revenue per Capita With State -Wide Averages by Population Class The City has generated more property tax revenue for its governmental funds revenue compared to the average Minnesota city. The City continues to generate more tax increment revenue per capita than average, as it has made use of this tool to finance commercial development. The City generates more special assessment revenue (typically used for new development) as the City continues to be in a growth phase. The City's per capita governmental funds revenue for 2016 was $1,297, a decrease of about 4.5 percent, from the prior year. Special assessments decreased $179 per capita, as the City received a large amount of assessments from the I-94 Interchange Project in 2015. Property tax revenue increased $41 per capita based on an increase in the tax levy. Intergovernmental revenue increased $37 per capita, due to the City receiving increased federal, state, and county funding in 2016 for the Highway 25/75 Intersection Project. Licenses and permits revenue increased $15 per capita, due to increased building permit sales related to increased development projects in 2016. Charges for services and other revenues increased $10 and $14 per capita, respectively, based on increased storm sewer trunk charges, higher investment earnings from an increase in investments, and the sale of parcels of land held for resale. EVA State -Wide City of Monticello Year December 31, 2015 2014 2015 2016 Population 2,500-10,000 10,000-20,000 20,000-100,000 12,993 13,125 13,299 Property taxes $ 443 $ 414 $ 443 $ 647 $ 658 $ 699 Tax increments 26 33 37 64 55 50 Franchise fees and other taxes 33 42 39 28 25 31 Special assessments 59 52 59 147 253 74 Licenses and permits 31 31 43 29 35 50 Intergovernmental revenues 285 322 156 56 116 153 Charges for services 110 85 94 131 157 167 Other 69 62 58 91 59 73 Total revenue $ 1,056 $ 1,041 $ 929 $ 1,193 $ 1,358 $ 1,297 The City has generated more property tax revenue for its governmental funds revenue compared to the average Minnesota city. The City continues to generate more tax increment revenue per capita than average, as it has made use of this tool to finance commercial development. The City generates more special assessment revenue (typically used for new development) as the City continues to be in a growth phase. The City's per capita governmental funds revenue for 2016 was $1,297, a decrease of about 4.5 percent, from the prior year. Special assessments decreased $179 per capita, as the City received a large amount of assessments from the I-94 Interchange Project in 2015. Property tax revenue increased $41 per capita based on an increase in the tax levy. Intergovernmental revenue increased $37 per capita, due to the City receiving increased federal, state, and county funding in 2016 for the Highway 25/75 Intersection Project. Licenses and permits revenue increased $15 per capita, due to increased building permit sales related to increased development projects in 2016. Charges for services and other revenues increased $10 and $14 per capita, respectively, based on increased storm sewer trunk charges, higher investment earnings from an increase in investments, and the sale of parcels of land held for resale. EVA The expenditures of governmental funds will also vary from state-wide averages and from year-to-year, based on the City's circumstances. Expenditures are classified into three types as follows: • Current — These are typically the general operating type expenditures occurring on an annual basis, and are primarily funded by general sources such as taxes and intergovernmental revenues. • Capital Outlay and Construction — These expenditures do not occur on a consistent basis, more typically fluctuating significantly from year-to-year. Many of these expenditures are project -oriented, and are often funded by specific sources that have benefited from the expenditure, such as special assessment improvement projects. • Debt Service — Although the expenditures for debt service may be relatively consistent over the term of the respective debt, the funding source is the important factor. Some debt may be repaid through specific sources such as special assessments or redevelopment funding, while other debt may be repaid with general property taxes. The City's expenditures per capita of its governmental funds for the past three years, together with comparative state-wide averages, are presented in the following table: Governmental Funds Expenditures per Capita With State -Wide Averages by Population Class The City's governmental funds current per capita expenditures are higher than state-wide averages for cities in the same population class. The City's per capita expenditures for capital outlay and construction increased significantly from the prior year and will vary on a yearly basis depending on current, ongoing capital projects. Debt service costs are significantly higher than other cities state-wide, due to the stage of development of the City. State -Wide City of Monticello Year December 31, 2015 2014 2015 2016 Population 2,500-10,000 10,000-20,000 20,000-100,000 12,993 13,125 13,299 Current General government $ 134 $ 109 $ 89 $ 112 $ 112 $ 112 Public safety 255 244 261 142 150 153 Street maintenance and lighting 119 117 99 138 132 146 Recreation and culture 88 108 94 184 200 207 All other 64 70 89 124 140 88 660 648 632 700 734 706 Capital outlay and construction 372 389 286 171 171 469 Debt service Principal 181 178 117 416 383 427 Interest and fiscal charges 51 40 33 51 49 48 232 218 150 467 432 475 Total expenditures $ 1,264 $ 1,255 $ 1,068 $ 1,338 $ 1,337 $ 1,650 The City's governmental funds current per capita expenditures are higher than state-wide averages for cities in the same population class. The City's per capita expenditures for capital outlay and construction increased significantly from the prior year and will vary on a yearly basis depending on current, ongoing capital projects. Debt service costs are significantly higher than other cities state-wide, due to the stage of development of the City. GOVERNMENTAL FUND BALANCES The following table summarizes the changes in the fund balances of the City's governmental funds during the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2016, presented both by fund balance classification and by fund: Governmental Fund Changes in Fund Balance As reflected in the table above, total governmental fund balance increased by $1,298,752. The increase was largely due to the increase in fund balance in the Capital Projects Fund from unspent bond proceeds and positive results compared to budget in the General Fund. These were both offset by the decrease in fund balance in the Debt Service Fund, mainly from the decrease in special assessments collected as well as increased principal payments on outstanding debt. In Fund Balance as of December 31, Increase 2015 2016 (Decrease) Fund balances of governmental funds Total by classification Nonspendable $ 4,373,045 $ 3,824,575 $ (548,470) Restricted 8,619,905 6,987,234 (1,632,671) Assigned 11,109,806 13,320,718 2,210,912 Unassigned 4,873,494 6,142,475 1,268,981 Total governmental funds $ 28,976,250 $ 30,275,002 $ 1,298,752 Total by fund Major funds General $ 4,986,796 $ 6,276,720 $ 1,289,924 Community Center 629,442 761,829 132,387 Economic Development Authority 6,562,865 7,142,330 579,465 Debt Service 5,382,214 3,543,551 (1,838,663) Capital Projects 5,392,213 6,884,229 1,492,016 Nonmajor funds 6,022,720 5,666,343 (356,377) Total governmental funds $ 28,976,250 $ 30,275,002 $ 1,298,752 As reflected in the table above, total governmental fund balance increased by $1,298,752. The increase was largely due to the increase in fund balance in the Capital Projects Fund from unspent bond proceeds and positive results compared to budget in the General Fund. These were both offset by the decrease in fund balance in the Debt Service Fund, mainly from the decrease in special assessments collected as well as increased principal payments on outstanding debt. In GENERAL FUND The City's General Fund accounts for the financial activity of the basic services provided to the community. The primary services included within this fund are the administration of the municipal operations, police and fire protection, building inspection, streets and highway maintenance, and recreation and culture. The following graph displays the City's General Fund trends of financial position and changes in the volume of financial activity. Fund balance and cash balance are typically used as indicators of financial health or equity, while annual expenditures are often used to measure the size of the operation. $8,500,000 $8,000,000 $7,500,000 $7,000,000 $6,500,000 $6,000,000 $5,500,000 $5,000,000 $4,500,000 $4,000,000 $3,500,000 $3,000,000 $2,500,000 $2,000,000 $1,500,000 $1,000,000 $500,000 General Fund Financial Position Year Ended December 31, 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 � Fund Balance D Cash Balance Expenditures The City's General Fund cash and investments balance at December 31, 2016 was $7,091,381, which increased $277,443 from 2015. Total fund balance at December 31, 2016 was $6,276,720, up $1,289,924. This fund balance level represents approximately 89.8 percent of the City's annual General Fund expenditures, based on 2016 expenditure levels. The City's adopted fund balance policy requires that the City set aside fund balance to represent 45.0 percent of expenditures for working capital and contingencies. Having an appropriate fund balance is an important factor because a government, like any organization, requires a certain amount of equity to operate. Generally, the amount of equity required typically increases as the size of the operation increases. A healthy financial position also allows the City to avoid volatility in tax rates; helps minimize the impact of state funding changes; allows for the adequate and consistent funding of services, repairs, and unexpected costs; and can be a factor in determining the City's bond rating and resulting interest costs. -10- The following illustration provides you with the components of the City's General Fund revenue compared to budget for 2016: Property Taxes Licenses and Permits Intergovernmental Charges for Services Other General Fund Revenue Budget to Actual p0� SOP �O) p0R�O� SOP p0� �O� �O� p0� zO� zO� p0� Opp, P'�O�p, ��, ODP pp, �0zz, OP Opp, �h�P, ■ Budget ❑ Actual Total General Fund revenues for 2016 were $8,271,556, which was $675,556 (8.9 percent) over the final budget. As reflected in the table above, other revenues were over budget by $166,059, which was mainly due to receiving dividends from the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust that were not expected in the budget. Licenses and permits revenue also exceeded budgeted amounts by $329,702, as a result of increased development and new construction that was not budgeted for. The following graph presents the City's General Fund revenue sources for the last five years: $6,500,000 $6,000,000 $5,500,000 $5,000,000 $4,500,000 $4,000,000 $3,500,000 $3,000,000 $2,500,000 $2,000,000 $1,500,000 $1,000,000 $500,000 General Fund Revenue by Source Year Ended December 31, Ta x es Intergovernmental Other ■ 2012 ■ 2013 ■ 2014 ❑ 2015 ■ 2016 The graph reflects the City's increasing reliance on taxes to finance its General Fund operations. Overall, General Fund revenues increased $633,910 (8.3 percent) from the previous year. Property taxes increased $298,174, due to an increase in the General Fund tax levy. Other revenues increased $301,410, mainly due to an increase in the sales of buildings permits in 2016 related to new home construction and other development projects. -11- The following graph illustrates the components of General Fund spending for 2016 compared to budget: General Governmental Public Safety Public Works Recreation and Culture Other General Fund Expenditures Budget to Actual 6�1 OHO OQO OHO OQO OQO OQO ■ Budget ■ Actual Total General Fund expenditures for 2016 were $6,992,812, which was $603,188 (7.9 percent) under budget. The public works area was under budget by $443,118, mainly in street repairs and administration. The general government area was under budget by $67,706, mainly within the finance department. The following illustration provides you with the components of the City's General Fund spending by function for the past five years: $2,250,000 $2,000,000 $1,750,000 $1,500,000 $1,250,000 $1,000,000 $750,000 $500,000 $250,000 General Fund Expenditures by Function Year Ended December 31, General Public Safety Public Works Recreation and Other Governmental Culture ■ 2012 ■ 2013 ■ 2014 ❑ 2015 ■ 2016 Overall, General Fund expenditures increased $277,443 (4.1 percent) from the prior year. All general fund expenditure functions increased in 2016, with the largest change in public works ($93,821), mainly due to increased equipment rentals. Public safety expenditures increased $63,791, mainly due to increased building inspections. -12- ENTERPRISE FUNDS OVERVIEW The City maintains several enterprise funds to account for services the City provides that are financed primarily through fees charged to those utilizing the service. This section of the report provides you with an overview of the financial trends and activities of the City's enterprise funds, which includes the Water Utility, Sewage Utility, Liquor Operations, Fiber Optics, and Deputy Registrar Funds. ENTERPRISE FUNDS FINANCIAL POSITION The following table summarizes the changes in the financial position of the City's enterprise funds during the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2016, presented both by classification and by fund: Enterprise Funds Change in Financial Position Net position of enterprise funds Total by classification Net investment in capital assets Unrestricted Total enterprise funds Total by fund Water Sewage Liquor Fiber Optics Deputy Registrar Net Position as of December 31, Increase 2015 2016 (Decrease) $ 40,722,087 $ 41,014,122 $ 292,035 8,136,000 8,998,670 862,670 $ 48,858,087 $ 50,012,792 $ 1,154,705 $ 14,328,760 $ 14,390,486 $ 61,726 19,813,546 20,489,128 675,582 905,806 1,141,827 236,021 13,400,141 13,361,470 (38,671) 409,834 629,881 220,047 Total enterprise funds $ 48,858,087 $ 50,012,792 $ 1,154,705 -13- WATER ENTERPRISE FUND The following graph presents 10 years of comparative operating results for the City's Water Enterprise Fund: $1,400,000 $1,300,000 $1,200,000 $1,100,000 $1,000,000 $900,000 $800,000 $700,000 $600,000 $500,000 $400,000 $300,000 $200,000 $100,000 Water Enterprise Fund Year Ended December 31, 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 D Operating Revenue Operating Expense Operating Income Before Depreciation At December 31, 2016, the Water Enterprise Fund had a cash balance of $4,035,865 and a net position of $14,390,486. Net position consisted of $10,135,313 in net investment in capital assets and $4,255,173 in unrestricted net position. Operating revenue in the Water Enterprise Fund is $1,172,258, an increase of $45,540 from the prior year, mostly due to an increase in rates while operating expenses for 2016 were $1,172,236, an increase of $67,000, mainly in personal services. It is important that this fund continue to have positive operating results so as not to place an additional burden on other city funds. It is also important that the City continue to monitor water rates so that they are designed to also provide for future repairs and replacement of the infrastructure assets. -14- SEWAGE ENTERPRISE FUND The following graph presents 10 years of comparative operating results for the City's Sewage Enterprise Fund: $2,800,000 $2,600,000 $2,400,000 $2,200,000 $2,000,000 $1,800,000 $1,600,000 $1,400,000 $1,200,000 $1,000,000 $800,000 $600,000 $400,000 $200,000 Sewage Enterprise Fund Year Ended December 31, 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 O Operating Revenue Operating Expense Operating Income (Loss) Before Depreciation At December 31, 2016, the Sewage Enterprise Fund had a cash balance of $2,596,530 and a net position balance of $20,489,128. Net position consisted of $17,580,101 in net investment in capital assets and $2,909,027 of unrestricted net position. Sewage Enterprise Fund operating revenues for 2016 were $2,223,252, which is $140,130 more than the previous year, due to increased rates and usage. Operating expenses for 2016 were $2,554,310, which decreased $28,244 from 2015. It is important that this fund have positive operating results so as not to place an additional burden on other city funds. It is also important that the City continue to monitor sewage rates so they are designed to also provide for future repairs and replacement of infrastructure assets. -15- LIQUOR ENTERPRISE FUND The following graph presents 10 years of comparative operating results for the Liquor Enterprise Fund: $5,600,000 $5,200,000 $4,800,000 $4,400,000 $4,000,000 $3,600,000 $3,200,000 $2,800,000 $2,400,000 $2,000,000 $1,600,000 $1,200,000 $800,000 $400,000 Liquor Enterprise Fund Year Ended December 31, 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 D Sales v Operating Expenses � Cost of Sales Operating Income (Loss) The Liquor Enterprise Fund ended 2016 with a net position balance of $1,141,827, an increase of $236,021 from the prior year. Of the net position balance, $177,354 represents the investment in liquor capital assets, leaving $964,473 of unrestricted net position. Liquor sales for 2016 were $5,448,584, a decrease of $40,846 from last year. The Liquor Enterprise Fund generated a gross profit of $1,407,360 in 2016, or about 25.8 percent, of gross sales. The Liquor Enterprise Fund's gross profit margin decreased to a more comparative percentage with 2014 and years prior after experiencing an improved gross profit percentage in 2015. Operating expenses for 2016 were $836,048, an increase of $34,503 from last year, due to increased personal services, and materials and supplies to meet the demand of consumers. -16- FIBER OPTICS ENTERPRISE FUND The following graph presents six years of comparative operating results for the Fiber Optics Enterprise Fund: $4,000,000 $3,500,000 $3,000,000 $2,500,000 $2,000,000 $1,500,000 $1,000,000 $500,000 $(500,000) $(1,000,000) $(1,500,000) Fiber Optics Enterprise Fund Year Ended December 31, 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Operating Revenue Operating Expense Operating Income (Loss) Before Depreciation 2016 At December 31, 2016, the Fiber Optics Enterprise Fund had a cash balance of $303,008 and a net position balance of $13,361,470. Net position consisted of $13,055,556 in net investment in capital assets and $305,914 of unrestricted net position. Operating revenue in this fund was $1,739,566, an increase of $97,163, or 5.9 percent, in 2016. Operating expenses also increased $61,128 in fiscal 2016. This was mainly due to turning over the management of the City's FiberNet Monticello to a third party management company, which caused an increase in other service charges. The operating loss before depreciation in this fund during this year was $331,799. This was an improvement of $35,808 in the current year, mostly related to increased operating revenues as the third party management company was better equipped to advertise the service and obtain more customers. As a result of improved, but still poor operating results, we recommend the City continue to monitor the financial results of this fund. The continued monitoring of this fund would include a discussion on how the current financial results compare to the future strategic plan for this fund. Most importantly, the future strategic plan should continue to include a discussion on the impact this fund is having on the overall financial health of the City, including what impact the changes made to the plan are expected to have on the City as a whole in the short-term, but also over the long-term. -17- DEPUTY REGISTRAR ENTERPRISE FUND The following graph presents eight years of comparative operating results for the City's Deputy Registrar Enterprise Fund: $600,000 $550,000 $500,000 $450,000 $400,000 $350,000 $300,000 $250,000 $200,000 $150,000 $100,000 $50,000 Deputy Registrar Fund Year Ended December 31, 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 D Operating Revenue Operating Expense Operating Income (Loss) before depreciation At December 31, 2016, the Deputy Registrar Enterprise Fund had a cash balance of $817,006 and a net position balance of $629,881. Net position consisted of $65,798 in net investment in capital assets and $564,083 of unrestricted net position. Deputy Registrar Enterprise Fund operating revenues for 2016 were $562,891, which is $26,960 more than the previous year, mostly due to an increase in charges for services. Operating expenses for 2016 were $352,117, which is $33,431 higher than 2015, due to increased personal services. GOVERNMENT -WIDE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS In addition to fund -based information, the current reporting model for governmental entities also requires the inclusion of two government -wide financial statements designed to present a clear picture of the City as a single, unified entity. These government -wide statements provide information on the total cost of delivering services, including capital assets and long-term liabilities. STATEMENT OF NET POSITION The Statement of Net Position essentially tells you what the City owns and owes at a given point in time, the last day of the fiscal year. Theoretically, net position represents the resources the City has leftover to use for providing services after its debts are settled. However, those resources are not always in spendable form, or there may be restrictions on how some of those resources can be used. Therefore, net position is divided into three components: net investment in capital assets, restricted, and unrestricted. The following table presents the components of the City's net position as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, for governmental activities and business -type activities: The City's total net position at December 31, 2016 was $4,774,784 higher than the prior year. Of the increase, $3,594,141 came from governmental activities and $1,180,643 from business -type activities. The increase in the net investment in capital assets balance was mostly due to capital outlay activity during fiscal 2016. At the end of the current fiscal year, the City is able to present positive balances in all three categories of net position, both for the government as a whole, as well as for its separate governmental and business -type activities. The same situation held true for the prior year. -19- December 31, Increase 2015 2016 (Decrease) Net position Governmental activities Net investment in capital assets $ 38,099,568 $ 41,077,683 $ 2,978,115 Restricted 12,633,770 10,569,693 (2,064,077) Unrestricted 18,144,067 20,824,170 2,680,103 Total governmental activities 68,877,405 72,471,546 3,594,141 Business -type activities Net investment in capital assets 40,722,087 41,014,122 292,035 Unrestricted 8,163,982 9,052,590 888,608 Total business -type activities 48,886,069 50,066,712 1,180,643 Total net position $ 117,763,474 $ 122,538,258 $ 4,774,784 The City's total net position at December 31, 2016 was $4,774,784 higher than the prior year. Of the increase, $3,594,141 came from governmental activities and $1,180,643 from business -type activities. The increase in the net investment in capital assets balance was mostly due to capital outlay activity during fiscal 2016. At the end of the current fiscal year, the City is able to present positive balances in all three categories of net position, both for the government as a whole, as well as for its separate governmental and business -type activities. The same situation held true for the prior year. -19- STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES The Statement of Activities tracks the City's yearly revenues and expenses, as well as any other transactions that increase or reduce total net positions. These amounts represent the full cost of providing services. The Statement of Activities provides a more comprehensive measure than just the amount of cash that changed hands, as reflected in the fund -based financial statements. This statement includes the cost of supplies used, depreciation of long-lived capital assets, and other accrual -based expenses. The following table presents the change in the net position of the City for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2016: General revenues Property taxes 8,683,585 9,270,592 Tax increments 727,617 668,352 Franchise taxes 333,484 412,217 Investment earnings 386,656 503,694 Gain on sale of capital assets 118,630 16,398 Special item — transfer of operations — 356,900 Special item— contribution of land to Wright County (5,511,547) — Total general revenues and special items 4,738,425 11,228,153 Change in net position (3,753,844) 4,774,784 Net position — beginning of year 121,517,318 117,763,474 Net position — end of year $ 117,763,474 $ 122,538,258 One of the goals of this statement is to provide a side-by-side comparison to illustrate the difference in the way the City's governmental and business -type operations are financed. The table clearly illustrates the dependence of the City's governmental operations on general revenues, such as property taxes and unrestricted grants. It also shows if the City's business -type activities are generating sufficient program revenues (service charges and program -specific grants) to cover expenses. This is critical given the current downward pressures on the general revenue sources. -20- Net Change 2015 2016 Net (expense) revenue Governmental activities General government $ (1,233,638) $ (1,419,802) Public safety (1,284,810) (1,098,466) Public works (2,456,534) (2,067,366) Sanitation (563,477) (510,344) Transit (40,000) (41,250) Recreation and culture (1,645,565) (2,052,388) Economic development (1,533,222) (455,388) Interest on long-term debt (688,855) (468,271) Business -type activities Water 292,437 191,639 Sewer 607,783 1,416,967 Liquor 725,707 577,597 Fiber optic (894,058) (743,696) Deputy registrar 221,963 217,399 Total net (expense) revenue (8,492,269) (6,453,369) General revenues Property taxes 8,683,585 9,270,592 Tax increments 727,617 668,352 Franchise taxes 333,484 412,217 Investment earnings 386,656 503,694 Gain on sale of capital assets 118,630 16,398 Special item — transfer of operations — 356,900 Special item— contribution of land to Wright County (5,511,547) — Total general revenues and special items 4,738,425 11,228,153 Change in net position (3,753,844) 4,774,784 Net position — beginning of year 121,517,318 117,763,474 Net position — end of year $ 117,763,474 $ 122,538,258 One of the goals of this statement is to provide a side-by-side comparison to illustrate the difference in the way the City's governmental and business -type operations are financed. The table clearly illustrates the dependence of the City's governmental operations on general revenues, such as property taxes and unrestricted grants. It also shows if the City's business -type activities are generating sufficient program revenues (service charges and program -specific grants) to cover expenses. This is critical given the current downward pressures on the general revenue sources. -20- LEGISLATIVE UPDATES The 2016 legislative session, falling in the second half of the state's fiscal biennium, was scheduled to be a short session lasting only 11 weeks. Since biennial budgets are adopted in odd -year legislative sessions, less time is usually needed for the even -year sessions. However, because the 2015 Legislature adjourned without passing funding bills in several significant areas, it was anticipated that the 2016 legislative session would be considerably more active than the typical short session. In spite of this, only a few funding bills were brought forth to the Governor by the end of the 2016 regular legislative session, including a supplemental budget bill and an omnibus tax bill. The Governor chose not to sign the tax bill due to a drafting error that would have resulted in an unintended reduction of state revenues. When the framework for a special session could not be agreed upon, the fiscal year ended without the adoption of a new tax bill, capital bonding bill, or transportation funding package. The following is a summary of recent legislation affecting Minnesota cities: Border -to -Border Broadband Grants — The 2016 supplemental budget act appropriated $35 million in fiscal 2017 for a Border -to -Border Broadband Grant Program. The grants, available through the Office of Broadband Development in the Department of Employment and Economic Development (DEED), provide funding to help communities meet state goals for the development of state-wide high-speed broadband access, focusing on areas currently considered to be underserved or with a high concentration of low-income households. Equity -Related Programs and Grants — The 2016 supplemental budget act also appropriated $35 million in fiscal 2017 for the financing of equity -related programs through DEED, the majority of which was allocated for programs and grants for communities of color, people with disabilities, seniors, and youth. Sales Tax Exemption — Effective January 1, 2017, the sales tax exemption on the purchase of goods or services enacted for cities in 2014 is expanded to include all special districts; city, county, or township instrumentalities; economic development authorities; housing and redevelopment authorities; and all joint power boards or organizations. Taxes Covered Under Debt Management Services — Amendments were made to the statutes governing debt management and debt settlement services to clarify the status of delinquent taxes owed to Minnesota local governments and political subdivisions as debt with regard to those services, and include those entities as creditors for the purpose of debt management services. Elections — An omnibus elections law was passed making several changes to elections administration requirements. In addition to establishing a presidential primary to take the place of the current caucus system beginning in 2020, the law modified election procedures in a number of areas, including: absentee balloting, voting station dimensions, election canvassing, candidate filing, the extension of polling hours to accommodate voters in line at closing, and emergency election plans. Police -Worn Body Cameras — A number of new laws were enacted related to portable recording systems (police -worn body cameras) and the data derived from their use, addressing: data retention and destruction, permitted uses of the systems, audits of the data, and vendor practices. Among the changes are a requirement for gathering public input before purchasing or implementing the use of portable recording systems, and requirements for the adoption and dissemination of written policies over the use of portable recording systems. Veteran Preference Act — New language was added to state statutes clarifying that Minnesota cities and towns may require a veteran to complete an initial probationary period when hired. -21- Charitable Gambling — Cities that require charitable gambling organizations to contribute 10 percent of their net profits to the city for charitable purposes are now required to acknowledge the source of the funds, either in communications about the receipt or distribution of the funds. Donation of Surplus Equipment — Local governments are now permitted to donate surplus public works equipment, cell phones, or emergency medical and firefighting equipment to nonprofit organizations. The donation of surplus equipment was added to the list of exceptions to municipal tort liability. Prior to making any such donations, a city must adopt a policy on how it will determine what equipment is considered surplus and eligible for donation and how it will determine which nonprofit organizations will receive such donations. The policy must address the city's obligation to disclose that the donated equipment may be defective and cannot be relied upon for safety. Temporary Family Health Care Housing Permits — A new special land use permit system was established for a specific type of mobile health care -related mobile housing, intended to provide transitional housing for seniors. Cities will be required to implement the new permit system unless they officially act to opt out of the program. The program sets forth requirements for structure and placement, the permit process and duration, applicants, inspections, and the process for opting out. Partition Fence Viewing Exemption — Cities now have the authority to pass a resolution to exempt adjoining owners or occupants from the partition fence law when their land is considered to be less than 20 acres combined, thereby relieving the city of the responsibility of participating in a potentially costly "fence -viewing" process to mediate disputes between adjoining landowners required to share the costs of constructing fences. -22- ACCOUNTING AND AUDITING UPDATES GASB STATEMENT NO. 73, ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL REPORTING FOR PENSIONS AND RELATED ASSETS THAT ARE NOT WITHIN THE SCOPE OF GASB STATEMENT 68, AND AMENDMENTS TO CER TAINPROVISIONS OF GASB STATEMENTS 67 AND 68 This statement extends the approach to accounting and financial reporting established in GASB Statement No. 68 to all pensions, including those not administered through a trust. Governmental employers participating in such plans will be required to report the total of any unfunded pension liability related to the plan in their accrual basis financial statements, rather than the net pension liability. The requirements of this statement that address accounting and financial reporting by employers and governmental nonemployer contributing entities for pensions not within the scope of GASB Statement No. 68, are effective for financial statements for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2016. This statement also clarified the application of certain provisions of GASB Statement Nos. 67 and 68 regarding 10 -year schedules of required supplementary information (RSI) and other recognition issues pertaining to employers and nonemployer contributing entities effective for financial statements for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2015. GASB STATEMENT NO. 74, FINANCIAL REPORTING FOR POSTEHPLOYHENT BENEFIT PLANS OTHER THAN PENSION PLANS This statement establishes new accounting and financial reporting requirements for other post -employment benefits (OPEB) plans, replacing GASB Statement Nos. 43 and 57. It also includes requirements for defined contribution OPEB plans that replace the requirements for those OPEB plans in GASB Statement Nos. 25, 43, and 50. This statement will improve financial reporting primarily through enhanced note disclosures and schedules of RSI that will be presented by OPEB plans administered through trusts meeting the specified criteria. The new information will enhance the decision -usefulness of the financial reports of those OPEB plans, their value for assessing accountability, and their transparency by providing information about measures of net OPEB liabilities and explanations of how and why those liabilities changed from year-to-year. The net OPEB liability information, including ratios, will offer an up-to-date indication of the extent to which the total OPEB liability is covered by the fiduciary net position of the OPEB plan. The comparability of the reported information for similar types of OPEB plans will be improved by the changes related to the attribution method used to determine the total OPEB liability. The contribution schedule will provide measures to evaluate decisions related to the assessment of contribution rates in comparison with actuarially determined rates, if such rates are determined. In addition, new information about rates of return on OPEB plan investments will inform financial report users about the effects of market conditions on the OPEB plan's assets over time and provide information for users to assess the relative success of the OPEB plan's investment strategy and the relative contribution that investment earnings provide to the OPEB plan's ability to pay benefits to plan members when they come due. This statement is effective for financial statements for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2016. Earlier application is encouraged. -23- GASB STATEMENT No. 75, ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL REPORTING FOR POSTEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS OTHER THANPENSIONS GASB Statement No. 75, Accounting and Financial Reporting for Postemployment Benefits Other Than Pensions, establishes new accounting and financial reporting requirements for governments whose employees are provided with OPEB, as well as for certain nonemployer governments that have a legal obligation to provide financial support for OPEB provided to the employees of other entities. This statement replaces the requirements of GASB Statement Nos. 45 and 57. This statement establishes standards for recognizing and measuring liabilities, deferred outflows of resources, deferred inflows of resources, and expense/expenditures. Similar to changes implemented for pensions, this statement requires the liability of employers and nonemployer contributing entities to employees for defined benefit OPEB (net OPEB liability) to be measured as the portion of the present value of projected benefit payments to be provided to current active and inactive employees that is attributed to those employees' past periods of service (total OPEB liability), less the amount of the OPEB plan's fiduciary net position. Note disclosure and RSI requirements about defined benefit OPEB also are addressed. This statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2017. Earlier application is encouraged. GASB STATEMENT No. 80, BLENDING REQUIREMENTS FOR CERTAIN COMPONENT UNITS AN AMENDMENT OF GASB STATEMENT NO. 14 The objective of this statement is to clarify the financial statement presentation requirements for certain component units. This statement amends the blending requirements for the financial statement presentation of component units of all state and local governments. The additional criterion requires blending of a component unit incorporated as a not-for-profit corporation in which the primary government is the sole corporate member. The additional criterion does not apply to component units included in the financial reporting entity pursuant to the provisions of GASB Statement No. 39, Determining Whether Certain Organizations Are Component Units—an amendment of GASB Statement No. 14. The requirements of this statement are effective for reporting periods beginning after June 15, 2016. Earlier application is encouraged. GASB STATEMENT No. 81, IRREVOCABLE SPLIT -INTEREST AGREEMENTS This statement provides recognition and measurement guidance for the accounting and financial reporting of irrevocable split -interest agreements by governments that are the beneficiary of such an agreement. Split -interest agreements are a type of giving agreement used by donors to provide resources to two or more beneficiaries, including governments. This statement requires that a government that receives resources pursuant to an irrevocable split -interest agreement (1) recognize assets, liabilities, and deferred inflows of resources at the inception of the agreement, (2) recognize assets representing its beneficial interests in irrevocable split -interest agreements that are administered by a third parry if the government controls the present service capacity of the beneficial interests, and (3) recognize revenue when the resources become applicable to the reporting period. The requirements of this statement are effective for financial statements for periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and should be applied retroactively. Earlier application is encouraged. -24- GASB STATEMENT NO. 82, PENSIONISSUES ANAMENDMENT OF GASB STATEMENTS NO. 67, NO. 68, AND NO. 73 The intent of this statement is to address certain issues raised with respect to GASB Statement Nos. 67, 68, and 73. This statement amends GASB Statement Nos. 67 and 68, changing the definition of "covered payroll" utilized in schedules of RSI from the payroll of employees that are provided with pensions through the pension plan, to the payroll on which contributions to a pension plan are based. It clarifies that a deviation, as the term is used in Actuarial Standards of Practice, is not considered to be in conformity with the requirements of GASB Statement Nos. 67, 68, or 73 for the selection of assumptions used in determining the total pension liability and related measures. It also clarifies that payments made by an employer to satisfy contribution requirements that are identified by the pension plan terms as plan member contribution requirements should be classified as plan member contributions for purposes of Statement No. 67 and as employee contributions for purposes of Statement No. 68, and requires that an employer's expense and expenditures for those amounts be recognized in the period for which the contribution is assessed and classified in the same manner as the employer classifies similar compensation other than pensions. The requirements of this statement are effective for reporting periods beginning after June 15, 2016, except for the requirements of this statement for the selection of assumptions in a circumstance in which an employer's pension liability is measured as of a date other than the employer's most recent fiscal year-end. In that circumstance, the requirements for the selection of assumptions are effective for that employer in the first reporting period in which the measurement date of the pension liability is on or after June 15, 2017. Earlier application is encouraged. GASB STATEMENT NO. 83, CERTAINASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS This statement addresses accounting and financial reporting for certain asset retirement obligations (ARO), which are legally enforceable liabilities associated with the retirement of a tangible capital asset. This statement establishes criteria for determining the timing and pattern of recognition of a liability and a corresponding deferred outflow of resources for ARO. A government that has legal obligations to perform future asset retirement activities related to its tangible capital assets should recognize a liability when it is both incurred and reasonably estimable. The measurement of an ARO is required to be based on the best estimate of the current value of outlays expected to be incurred, and a deferred outflow of resources associated with an ARO is required to be measured at the amount of the corresponding liability upon initial measurement. This statement requires the current value of a government's AROs to be adjusted for the effects of general inflation or deflation at least annually, and a government to evaluate all relevant factors at least annually to determine whether the effects of one or more of the factors are expected to significantly change the estimated asset retirement outlays. A government should remeasure an ARO only when the result of the evaluation indicates there is a significant change in the estimated outlays. Deferred outflows of resources should be reduced and recognized as outflows of resources in a systematic and rational manner over the estimated useful life of the tangible capital asset. If a government owns a minority interest in a jointly owned tangible asset where a nongovernmental entity is the majority owner or has operational responsibility for the jointly owned asset, the government's minority share of an ARO should be reported using the measurement produced by the nongovernmental majority owner or the nongovernmental minority owner that has operational responsibility, without adjustment to conform to the liability measurement and recognition requirements of this statement. -25- The statement also requires disclosures of any funding or financial assurance requirements a government has related to the performance of asset retirement activities, along with any assets restricted for the payment of the government's AROs. This statement also requires disclosure of information about the nature of a government's AROs, the methods and assumptions used for the estimates of the liabilities, and the estimated remaining useful life of the associated tangible capital assets. If an ARO (or portions thereof) has been incurred by a government but is not yet recognized because it is not reasonably estimable, the government is required to disclose that fact and the reasons therefor. This statement requires similar disclosures for a government's minority shares of AROs. The requirements of this statement are effective for reporting periods beginning after June 15, 2018. Earlier application is encouraged. GASB STATEMENT No. 84, FIDUCIARYACTIVITIES This statement establishes criteria for identifying fiduciary activities of all state and local governments. The focus of the criteria generally is on (1) whether a government is controlling the assets of the fiduciary activity and (2) the beneficiaries with whom a fiduciary relationship exists. Separate criteria are included to identify fiduciary component units and postemployment benefit arrangements that are fiduciary activities. An activity meeting the criteria should be reported in a fiduciary fund in the basic financial statements, which should present a statement of fiduciary net position and a statement of changes in fiduciary net position. This statement describes four fiduciary funds that should be reported, if applicable: (1) pension (and other employee benefit) trust funds, (2) investment trust funds, (3) private -purpose trust funds, and (4) custodial funds. Custodial funds generally should report fiduciary activities that are not held in a trust or equivalent arrangement that meets specific criteria. A fiduciary component unit, when reported in the fiduciary fund financial statements of a primary government, should combine its information with its component units that are fiduciary component units and aggregate that combined information with the primary government's fiduciary funds. This statement also provides for recognition of a liability to the beneficiaries in a fiduciary fund when an event has occurred that compels the government to disburse fiduciary resources, defined as when a demand for the resources has been made or when no further action, approval, or condition is required to be taken or met by the beneficiary to release the assets. The requirements of this statement are effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018. Earlier application is encouraged. -26- City Council Agenda — 6/26/17 4B. Consideration of a request for Comprehensive Plan Amendment reguiding Outlots C & D. Otter Creek Crossing from `Places to Shop' to `Places to Work' and a request for Rezoning the subiect parcels from a B-4 (Regional Business) District to a I-1 (Light Industrial) District. Applicant: Jim Bowers and John Chadwick (NAC) Property: Outlot C & D, Otter Creek Crossing 155-171-000030 & 155-171-000040 Lengthy Legals for Parcels Planning Case Number: 2017-013 A. REFERENCE & BACKGROUND The applicant has requested that the Citv Council table action on this item until July. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS Motion to table action on the request for Comprehensive Plan Amendment reguiding Outlots C & D, Otter Creek Crossing from `Places to Shop' to `Places to Work' and a request for Rezoning the subject parcels from a B-4 (Regional Business) District to a I-1 (Light Industrial) District to the July 10th, 2017 meeting of the City Council. 2. Motion of other. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff defers to Council on the request to table. D. SUPPORTING DATA A. Applicant Request to Table B. Staff Report, 6/12/17, including: a. Resolution 2017- b. Ordinance No. 6XX c. Resolution PC -2017-008 d. Planning Commission Minutes, May 2nd, 2017 e. Aerial Site Image f. Applicant Narrative g. Excerpt, Monticello Comprehensive Plan: i. Land Use Map ii. Economic Development h. Commercial Land Inventory Map i. Industrial Land Inventory Map City Council Agenda — 6/26/17 j. Excerpt, Monticello Zoning Ordinance i. IBC (Industrial Business Campus) ii. I-1 (Light Industrial) iii. Use Table k. Excerpt, Monticello Interchange Study i. Concept Maps 1. Monticello Zoning Map 2 June; 21, 2017 Ms. Angela Schumann, AICP Community Development Director City of Monticello 505 Walnut St., Suite 1 Monticello, MN 55362 RE: Extension of Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning for Outlot C, Otter Creek Crossing, PID #155-171-000030. Dear Angela; I would like to table the application for the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning, for the above referenced property, until one of the July City Council meetings. This letter is stating that the delay is at the request of the applicant, and the city has complied with Minnesota Statute 15.99 as to the required response period. Thank You for your assistance. JX ]Bowers, LLC. Jim owers John Chadwick Farms, LLC June 21, 2017 Ms. Angela Schumann, AICP Community Development Director City of Monticello 505 Walnut St., Suite 1 Monticello, MN 55362 RE: Extension of Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning for Oudot D, Otter Creek Crossing, PID #155-171-000040. Dear Angela; I would like to table the application for the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning, for the above referenced property, until one of the July City Council meetings. This letter is stating that the delay is at the request of the applicant, and the city has complied with Minnesota Statute 15.99 as to the required response period. Thank You for your assistance. Sincerel , 469e J E. Chadwick Vef Manager John Chadwick Farms 4477 Manitou Road Excelsior MN 55331 John Chadwick 952-853-247 johnchadwick@chadwickland.com CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2017 -XX APPROVING A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT REDESIGNATING FROM "PLACES TO SHOP" TO "PLACES TO WORK" FOR OUTLOTS C & D, OTTER CREEK CROSSING WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted a request to reguide the subject property, identified as Outlot C & D, Otter Creek Crossing and legally described in the attached "Exhibit A", resulting in a change from business-related land uses to industrial -related land uses; and WHEREAS, the applicant concurrently proposes to market the property for industrial users; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendment is consistent with the long-term use and development of the property suggested by the Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the City has experienced a need for additional industrial land through development inquiries; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on May 2, 2017 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission, all of the comments of the hearing, and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: 1. The land use plan amendment is an appropriate means of furthering the intent of the Comprehensive Plan for the site. 2. The use of the site for industrial development is consistent with the City's economic development objectives. 3. The amendment results in a land use designation that more closely achieves the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan than would the current regulations. 4. The amendment results in the potential for development that would be compatible and consistent with the existing surrounding land uses in the area. 6. The resulting land uses will have impacts on public services, including sewer, water, stormwater treatment, and traffic which have been planned to serve the property for the subject property as proposed. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA: The Monticello City Council approves the Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan redesignating the subject property as legally described in "Exhibit A" from "Places to Shop" to "Places to Work". ADOPTED BY the City Council of Monticello, Minnesota this 12th day of June, 2017. ATTEST: CITY OF MONTICELLO Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator Brian Stumpf, Mayor EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT PARCELS PARCEL 1: That part of Outlot D, OTTER CREEK CROSSING, according to the recorded plat thereof, Wright County, Minnesota, lying southeasterly of a line parallel with and distant 1689.64 feet northwesterly of, as measured at right angles to the southeasterly line of said Outlot D. PARCEL 2: Outlot C, OTTER CREEK CROSSING, according to the recorded plat thereof, Wright County, Minnesota. :►m That part of Outlot D, OTTER CREEK CROSSING, according to the recorded plat thereof, Wright County, Minnesota, lying northwesterly of a line parallel with and distant 1689.64 feet northwesterly of, as measured at right angles to the southeasterly line of said Outlot D. ORDINANCE NO. 669 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 10 OF THE MONTICELLO CITY CODE, KNOWN AS THE ZONING ORDINANCE, BY REZONING THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY FROM B-4, GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT TO IBC, INDUSTRIAL BUSINESS CAMPUS DISTRICT: OUTLOTS C AND D, OTTER CREEK CROSSING THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO HEREBY ORDAINS: Section 1. The zoning map of the City of Monticello is hereby amended to rezone the following described parcels from B-4, Regional Business to IBC, Industrial Business Campus District: PID NUMBERS: 155-171-000030 & 155-171-000040 (See attached Legal Description) Section 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to mark the official zoning map to reflect this ordinance. The map shall not be republished at this time. Section 3. The City Clerk is hereby directed to make the changes required by this Ordinance as part of the Official Monticello City Code, Title 10, Zoning Ordinance, and to renumber the tables and chapters accordingly as necessary to provide the intended effect of this Ordinance. The City Clerk is further directed to make necessary corrections to any internal citations that result from said renumbering process, provided that such changes retain the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance as has been adopted. Section 5. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage and publication. The ordinance in its entirety and map shall be posted on the City website after publication. Copies of the complete Ordinance and map are available online and at Monticello City Hall for examination upon request. ADOPTED BY the Monticello City Council this day of , 2017. Brian Stumpf, Mayor ORDINANCE NO. 669 ATTEST: Jeff O'Neill, Administrator AYES: NAYS: ORDINANCE NO. 669 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT PARCELS PARCEL 1: That part of Outlot D, OTTER CREEK CROSSING, according to the recorded plat thereof, Wright County, Minnesota, lying southeasterly of a line parallel with and distant 1689.64 feet northwesterly of, as measured at right angles to the southeasterly line of said Outlot D. PARCEL 2: Outlot C, OTTER CREEK CROSSING, according to the recorded plat thereof, Wright County, Minnesota. AND That part of Outlot D, OTTER CREEK CROSSING, according to the recorded plat thereof, Wright County, Minnesota, lying northwesterly of a line parallel with and distant 1689.64 feet northwesterly of, as measured at right angles to the southeasterly line of said Outlot D. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2017-008 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT REDESIGNATING THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM "PLACES TO SHOP" TO "PLACES TO WORK", AND REZONING THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM "B-4", REGIONAL BUSINESS TO "IBC", INDUSTRIAL BUSINESS CAMPUS" WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted a request to reguide and rezone subject property, identified as Outlot C & D, Otter Creek Crossing, resulting in a change from business-related land uses to industrial -related land uses; and WHEREAS, the applicant concurrently proposes to market the property for industrial users; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendments are consistent with the long-term use and development of the property suggested by the Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the City has experienced a need for additional industrial land through development inquiries; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on May 2, 2017 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: 1. The land use plan amendment and rezoning are an appropriate means of furthering the intent of the Comprehensive Plan for the site. 2. The use of the site for industrial development is consistent with the City's economic development objectives. 3. The amendments result in a land use designation that more closely achieves the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan than would the current regulations. 4. The amendments result in the potential for development that would be compatible and consistent with the existing surrounding land uses in the area. 6. The resulting land uses will have impacts on public services, including sewer, water, stormwater treatment, and traffic which have been planned to serve the property for the subject property as proposed. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2017-008 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, that the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the Monticello City Council approves the Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan, redesignating the subject property from "Places to Shop" to "Places to Work", and adopts Ordinance No. rezoning the subject property from B-4, Regional Business to IBC, Industrial Business Campus. ADOPTED this 2nd day of May, 2017, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION L'In ATTEST: Brad Fyle, Chair Angela Schumann, Community Development Director 2 MINUTES REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, May 2°d, 2017 - 6:00 p.m. Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center Special Joint Meeting Mississippi Room - 5:00 PM Concept Stage Planned Unit Development for Detached Townhome Lots Applicant: Carlisle Village, LLC Present: John Alstad, Brad Fyle, Sam Murdoff, Marc Simpson, Lucas Wynne Council Liaison: Charlotte Gabler Staff: Angela Schumann, Steve Grittman (NAC), John Rued 1. General Business A. Call to Order Chairman Brad Fyle called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. B. Consideration of aoDrovine minutes a. Special Meeting Minutes — April 01, 2017 MARC SIMPSON MOVED TO APPROVE THE SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES OF APRIL 4TH, 2017. MOTION SECONDED BY SAM MURDOFF SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED, 5-0. b. Regular Meeting Minutes — April 411, 2017 MARC SIMPSON MOVED TO APPROVE THE REGULAR MEETING MINUTES OF APRIL 4TH, 2017. MOTION SECONDED BY SAM MURDOFF SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED, 5-0. C. Citizen Comments None. D. Consideration of adding items to the agenda Marc Simpson asked to add an item at the end of agenda. 2. Public Hearings A. Public Hearing — Consideration of a reauest for Rezoning to Planned Unit Development, a request for Development Stage Planned Unit Development for Vehicle Sales and Rental, Auto Repair — Minor, and Accessory Office and Retail Uses in a B-3 (Hiehwav Business) District Applicant: FRHP Lincolnshire, LLC Brad Fyle announced that the applicant requested tabling action. Brad Fyle opened the public hearing. Hearing no comments, the public hearing was closed. SAM MURDOFF MOVED TO TABLE ACTION TO THE JUNE 6TH, 2017 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. MARC SIMPSON SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED, 5-0. B. Public Hearing — Consideration of a reauest for Comprehensive Plan Amendment for `Places to Shop' to `Places to Work' and a reauest for Rezoning from a B-4 (Regional Business) District to a I-1 (Light Industriall) District Applicant: Jim Bowers and John Chadwick Steve Grittman stated two parcels were included in the land use application request. The properties are referred to as the Bowers/Chadwick parcels and lie between I-94 and Chelsea Road. It is west of Moon Motorsports and adjacent to the City's industrial development park. Grittman noted that the area was previously rezoned from industrial to commercial due to the economy at the time. Since commercial development has not occurred, the applicants sought to re - guide the property from "Places to Shop" to "Places to Work" and rezone from B- 4 (Regional Business) District to I-1 (Light Industrial). Grittman explained that requests for re -guiding and rezoning, the City examines a number of factors that support the change. Surrounding land use patterns, adequate utilities and roadways, and City policies for Economic Development were all mentioned. The City notes that there is becoming a tighter demand for industrial land and they have been receiving inquiries routinely. Grittman noted that the request would be consistent with the industrial land designations located to the south and west of the parcels. Chelsea Road is a major collector road and is able to accommodate large amounts of traffic. At the current time the land use is compatible with the area, but the City is also working on an interchange land study. Grittman explained that the plan is looking at the intersection of County Road 39 and I-94, which could have implications for development of the Bowers/Chadwick's parcels. Staff believes that the industrial designation would be compatible, but a possible interchange at County Road 39 and I-94 could cause commercial development pressure directly at the interchange location. Staff noted concerns with outdoor storage that would be visible from the freeway that would be allowed under the I-1 District zoning request. Staff therefore recommended rezoning the parcels to IBC (Industrial and Business Campus) District. Grittman noted that the setbacks and uses were similar with the two industrial districts, but outdoor storage would be restricted and site and building design requirements also vary between the two. City staff felt that a visual transition from the freeway to the west and south industrial would be complimentary by having the parcels rezoned to IBC, as the City's industrial park has in place covenants which restrict outdoor storage and require a higher design 2 standard. Staff recommended re -guiding the parcels from "Places to Shop" to "Places to Work" and rezoning to IBC. Brad Fyle asked if the property abuts the freeway right-of-way line. Grittman confirmed and stated there was not a designated easement along the freeway other than the standard drainage and utility easement. Charlotte Gabler commented that she believed either industrial zoning designation would match the area. Marc Simpson asked if the main difference between the IBC and the I-1 District was outdoor storage. Grittman confirmed, stating additional requirements would also apply for building materials and site plan. He also mentioned that the IBC allows a few business related uses such as office and hospitality uses. Sam Murdoff asked if there was an idea of when a possible interchange would be constructed. Grittman stated that until work has been completed on Highway 25 planning, the work on west interchange planning has been put on hold. Marc Simpson asked what the red dotted line around the parcels meant. Grittman stated that the parcels were located in the Special Use Overlay District. Fyle opened the public hearing and invited the applicant to speak first. Wayne Elam, Commercial Realty Solutions, explained that each parcel is 19 acres. He provided history of the reason for the request and stated that he sat in on an EDA Meeting, where Jim Thares noted the City was running short on industrial land. There were requests out there from industrial developers looking for 5 to 20 acres of land and with current industrial needs could not be met with Otter Creek. Following the meeting, Elam met with John Chadwick and Jim Bowers to discuss the City's need for more industrial land. Elam recommended that they request rezoning from business to industrial. Elam echoed concerns industrial developers have with the shape of the lots in Otter Creek Industrial Park and said that rectangle shaped lots were most cost effective for industrial development. Elam stated the City has 317 acres of commercially zoned land with 80 acres of commercial land on the interstate. He expected the commercial development to occur mostly south of Highway 25 or near Mills Fleet Farm. Elam also indicated that they are requesting I-1 and noted some of the differences with the I-1 and IBC Districts. He stated that he didn't feel this location would be good for a hotel. He expressed concerns with precluding outdoor storage. He reiterated the importance of the I-1 designation and offered a better screening requirement as a tradeoff. John Chadwick, 4477 Manitou Lane, Excelsior, explained the history of the parcels. Chadwick mentioned the benefits of the rezoning that would occur with industrial development especially because of the location of the lift -station. Chadwick expressed that the IBC was not consistent in the area, and that I-1 is located adjacent to the property. Gabler stated the City and IEDC are working on increasing the size of the industrial park or land availability. Wayne Elam stated there is currently IBC land located in the City, with 13 vacant, acres east of the Monticello Workforce Center and 7.5 acres in between Mills Fleet Farm and UMC. He noted that there has not been any development on IBC land. Angela Schumann responded that when the City recodified the Zoning Ordinance, the previously distinguished I -A District was removed, while the IBC was added. Land that was designated I -A was either zoned to IBC or I-1. Schumann confirmed that there has been no construction on the IBC districts. Brad Fyle commented that he didn't want to recommend approval of a rezoning if the owner didn't want it rezoned. Elam stated that he was speaking on behalf of the owners and that they wanted to rezone away from commercial to industrial, either IBC or I-1. Elam reiterated the importance of rezoning to I-1. Gabler asked if a future applicant could apply for a PUD for the parcels and request outdoor storage. Schumann confirmed and added that under the I-1, outdoor storage could be as large as the principal building. She noted that staff are currently working on a revised set of standards for screening and outdoor storage that would come forward at a future meeting. Schumann stated that staff recommend staying with the IBC District because of the restrictions on outdoor storage due to the visbilityof the double fronting lots. Fyle expressed he was leaning towards rezoning to IBC because of visibility. Elam added that with the changes that were soon to be proposed for outdoor storage and screening, he suggested increasing the height of screening. Murdoff asked for examples of outdoor storage that could be seen in this area. Grittinan responded that it depended on the development. Lucas Wynne stated that the decision is based on the desire for how Monticello wants to present itself in the future. Wynne expressed desire for a stricter set of zoning standards due to visibility, but also had concerns with restricting the type of industrial development. Elam noted that if the City rezoned the area to IBC that they also needed to look where they would put additional I-1. 11 Murdoff agreed that there was a need for I-1 with outdoor storage, but wasn't sure if those parcels were the right area. He expressed that a rezoning could possibly be a disservice as there currently is no development plans for the area. Schumann noted that the City is very aware of the need for industrial land. She expressed that the City has a Comprehensive Plan which guides areas for places to work. Schumann than talked about outdoor storage, stating that it didn't have to do strictly with the site appearance, but rather the amount of jobs, wages, and tax base. She noted the importance of balancing outdoor storage with increasing jobs and tax base. MARC SIMPSON MOVED TO ADOPT RESOLUTION PC -2017 - 008 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT TO "PLACES TO WORK", AND ORDINANCE NO. 6XX FOR REZONING FROM B-4 (REGIONAL BUSINESS) DISTRICT TO IBC (INDUSTRIAL BUSINESS CAMPUS) DISTRICT AS PROPOSED BY CITY STAFF. BRAD FYLE SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED, 5-0. Schumann stated that the recommendation would be subject to a super -majority vote by the City Council on May 22nd. 3. Regular Agenda A. Consideration of the Communitv Develonnlent Directors Report Angela Schumann thanked Council Member Gabler for being on top of things at the legislature. Schumann noted the League of MN Cities resource information on legislature items such as interim ordinances was provided in the packet. Schumann also noted that on Thursday, May 4th the Small Area Study Steering Committee would be meeting. She expected that a plan would come before the commission in a June or July meeting. There would be a public open house at West Bridge Park. Information about educational sessions was also provided. 4. Added Items Marc Simpson asked Schumann if the Planning Commission could move to electronic agendas. Schumann responded saying that the City Council was trying them out first. She believed that the City Clerk stated within the next few years that the EDA and Planning Commission would also transfer over. 5. Adjournment MARC SIMPSON MOVED TO ADJOURN THE MEETING AT 7:07 P.M. SAM MURDOFF SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED, 5-0. Recorder: Jacob Thunander T7 Approved: May 2, 2017 5 Attest: Angela Scl� Development Director Bowers, Jim/Chadwick, John - Request for Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning Outlot C & D, Otter Creek Crossing 1155-171-000030& 155-171-000040 1 Lengthy Legals Created by: City of Monticello Ahl AO► COMMERCIAL REALTY SOLUTIONS ww:.,.commrealiysolutions.com April 3, 2017 1 �CIEUVE D AP j 1017 RE: Zoning Change Application and Comprehensive Plan Amendment from B-4 to I-1. Properties: John Chadwick Farms, LLC XXXX Chelsea Road West, Monticello Otter Creek Crossing, 19.08 acres, Outlot D PID: 155-171-000040 JX Bowers, LLC XXXX Chelsea Road West, Monticello Otter Creek Crossing, 19.09 acres, Outlot C PID #155-171-000030 This is a joint application. Reason for Request: This property is between the City owned Otter Creek Industrial Park and I-94. There is a need for large acreage industrial parcels. This property is a logical solution for adding additional industrial land without incurring large infrastructure development costs. There is in excess of 300 acres of available property within the City of Monticello that is zoned Commercial, of which approximately 80 acres of that land is located on the interstate. It is a better use of the property for both the City and the Owners to rezone it to I-1 Industrial. 2 �' � f..� � :a�F� - ,�. �.•�t�, '�_"8t . _ � .. � ;I,(�,• •;fit .i. �"" . f. � _ ar: ,�+La„ .ta {..'' t - � " *.Y •i��;. � � fir{ - 1 �w'4+„ � A?��' }II�"a# V'�--ter .,. f , �,4' �; ,�' 7{ L JM.�- �' '` 'T�`M _.. "3•#ct��, � It I .' -. ".� � f � +� d ;�. �3•'�1,� �_ .� � ��4tVNES.:,�,�A.S 4„ +�• r�i�.�s� -- j �j LY Ln r 4 S fv. •,/��/• �w�y,� �f• •% rY ��•f } •..�A'' �� •� � .rain ! .�� ( Y♦ I J_ _- •��r� ILwAY• •n NO�, �' 1G' � 1 ! �. �1.. �� `j'. f _ • ►• �'}' � r . rL�fl {r 4� ��f(q,- '•"4 LO Ck EST � I • p `��p- '� : �a�c ,� �-,�'�e�a.,,`�`�rr` �" �• �� r..�r, l "�•1 � s � �``�'��•-,df � �,,+� ia+..rr ,ut�, �.�� y �� 'r �, '�', � • I .ter-..' �•i/ ♦ i {j4`r'�f'i F A -C' Ln - - ts,. _ • . ,JJ f ��•^- z ; -'- / �► 1,� � .rte,.... `� • �`'' `` �� • �. ": 'I {Y�,J Y moi. p�wt �•. -�� j'5��/ I .• w � y.. 3 _In. F T' � � ,yam ,� • � j 0 V, 1A p .i 1 p t LL 13 I • .. Via. -�._. � _� "' � •r �!W_C�F1.Y-�N�1R� Y.s:.l �_ '` \�:;t �+��'�� YR I1 V'JL'� Y �! Q � ( V FA ILA Birch Lake ° a North 106 e E' Lake 0 Cc 0 0.25 0.5 1 s Miles ► ° a Data Source: MnDNR, Sherburne County, Wright County, and WSB & Associates. June 9, 2014 Amended by City Council Resolution 2014-062, June 9, 2014 Legend Places to Live Lake Qr) + Places to Shop i Places to Work Places to Recreate - L 'p + Places for Community ?r Lake�) + Downtown Mixed Use o Interchange Planning Area a Urban Reserve Infrastructure 0 0� ^- Rivers and Streams iPublic Waters Inventory Wetlands (National & Public Waters Inventories) D root Potential Greenway Q J Potential Interchange ° Future Bridge *%a* Existing Arterial or Collector Road 1 'j*,* Proposed Arterial or Collector Road ^�� Powerline Monticello City Boundary Orderly Annexation Area c "' I I NE � 1�, o Land Use Plan Facilitating Redevelopment The Comprehensive Plan seeks to create a place where land use plans, policies, and controls work together with private investment to properly maintain all properties in Monticello. It is recognized that this approach may not succeed in all locations. Despite the best plans and intentions, properties may become physically deteriorated and/or economically inviable. In such places, city intervention may be need to facilitate redevelopment and prevent the spread of blight. This intervention may include: ► Acquisition of land. ► Preparation of sites for development. ► Construction or reconstruction of public improvements. ► Provision of adequate parking supply. ► Remediation of polluted land as needed. ► Removal of other physical and economic barriers to achieve community objectives. These actions may require the use of tax increment financing, tax abatement, or other finance tools available to the City. Development Strategies The following strategies will be used to implement the Comprehensive Plan in the area of Economic Development: 1. The City must use the Comprehensive Plan to provide adequate locations for future job - producing development (Places to Work). 2. The City should adhere to the Comprehensive Plan to encourage stable business setting and promote investment and expansion of facilities. 3. The City should coordinate utility planning and manage other development to ensure that expansion areas are capable of supporting new development in a timely manner. 4. The City will continue to work with existing businesses to maintain an excellent business environment, retain jobs, and facilitate expansions. 5. In addition to assisting business seeking to locate in Monticello, the City should actively target and market to businesses which will be a supplier, customer or collaborative partner to existing businesses within the community. 6. The City should target and market to businesses which would benefit from Monticello's utility and communications infrastructure. 7. The City will work with the CentraCare Health System to ensure the retention and to promote the expansion of health care services in Monticello. 8. The City will use the Comprehensive Plan to maintain and enhance the quality of life in Monticello as a tool for attracting businesses and jobs. 2008 Comprehensive Plan - Updated 2013 Economic Development 1 4-7 Ideally, the Comprehensive Plan does not have an Economic Development chapter. The Land Use Plan would be sufficient to channel market forces to meet the development objectives of the community. In reality, certain development needs cannot be met without public intervention. The Economic Development chapter of the Plan focuses on the aspects of Monticello's future that require particular attention and action by the City. These actions include: ► Attracting and retaining jobs ► Expanding the tax base ► Enhancing the economic vitality of Downtown ► Facilitating redevelopment Attracting and Retaining Jobs The creation and retention of jobs is one of the most important objectives for Monticello. Jobs, particularly jobs with income levels capable of supporting a family, are key to achieving many elements of Monticello's vision for the future. ► Jobs attract residents to the community. Jobs will pay a critical role in creating the type of "move up" housing sought by the City. ► Jobs provide the income needed to support local business and government services. ► Retention of businesses promote community stability by keeping jobs and residents in Monticello. The Community Context chapter of the Comprehensive Plan contains a section on Employment. This section contains data about employment in Monticello and of its residents. Among the key findings in this section are: ► While the community added nearly 5,000 people between 2000 and 2010 according to the U.S. Census, it only added 1,430 jobs according to the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW). In 2010, the community had 6,992 jobs according to the QCEW but 7,093 people in the labor force according to the Census. 2008 Comprehensive Plan — Updated 2013 Economic Development 1 4-1 ► The U.S. Census Bureau, Center for Economic Studies' OntheMap website shows that in 2010 4,597 people leave the community each day to work, while 3,849 people come into the community to work. Only 835 both live and work in the community. ► Approximately 15% of residents in 2010 are employed within the community. This has dropped from 18% in 2002. ► As shown in Figure 4.1, 2012 data from the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development (DEED) on their mnprospector.com website shows that Monticello is made up of a wide range of small to medium sized employers. Only 10 employers have more than 100 employees. Over half have fewer than four (4) employees. ► Workers for Monticello businesses come primarily from Monticello and the surrounding region. Nearly 75% of people working in Monticello live in Monticello, adjacent townships, or other places in Wright and Sherburne counties (2010 OntheMap). ► Nearly 40% of Monticello residents work in Hennepin County, with the largest percentage in Minneapolis, Plymouth, and Maple Grove. Another 15% work elsewhere in Wright County, including Buffalo and St. Michael. ► The 2007-2011 American Community Survey (ACS) Census reported a mean travel time to work of 28.5 minutes. This is up from the 2000 Census travel time of 24 minutes. The mean travel time in the 2007-2011 ACS was 29.7 minutes for Wright County and 24.5 minutes for the region overall. Figure 4-1:2012 Total Establishments by Size 1-4 Employees 254 52.05 5-9 Employees 97 19.88 10-19 Employees 64 13.11 20-49 Employees 42 8.61 50-99 Employees 21 4.30 100-249 Employees 7 1.43 250-499 Employees 2 0.41 500-999 Employees 1 0.20 Background Reports The City of Monticello conducts studies and assessments as needed to help guide its economic development efforts. The findings and recommendations of these studies are summarized below with the most recent provided first. 2010 Business Retention and Expansion Research (BR&E) Report Monticello's Business Retention and Expansion (BR&E) program was initiated by the City of Monticello, the Monticello Chamber of Commerce and Industry, DEED, and the University of Minnesota Extension. It was also sponsored by over a dozen local businesses. Through the BR&E program, 60 businesses were visited. Findings from the visits and data analysis found: ► 78% of the visited businesses were locally owned and operated. ► 20% of businesses were in manufacturing, 18% in retail trade, and 13% in other services. ► The businesses employed over 1,600 full-time and 975 part-time employees, with a trimmed average (an average where the low and high were discarded to prevent skewing) of 15.38 full-time employees, slightly down from 15.52 three years ago. The firms also had a trimmed average of 7.76 part-time employees, up from 6.96 three years ago. ► Most full-time employees are in manufacturing, food and beverage, retail trade, and medical, while part-time employees are in medical, retail trade, and tourism/recreational services. ► Survey results indicated that the medical industry is the highest employer in Monticello, followed by retail trade and manufacturing. ► Businesses in the community are fairly stable with about half expecting some type of change. The BR&E identified four strategies aimed at helping businesses become more profitable. Each strategy was accompanied by a list of potential projects intended to be ideas for the community to explore. The implementation of the projects is intended to be a collaborative effort among the various sectors of the community. The four strategies identified included: 4-2 1 Economic Development City of Monticello ► Improve Business Retention and Expansion Through Technical and Development Assistance. ► Improve Labor Force Availability and Productivity. ► Improve Infrastructure to Help Move Goods, Customers, and the Labor Force More Efficiently. ► Improve and Promote the Quality of Life in Monticello. During the 2013 comprehensive plan economic development update process, it was noted that the 2010 Business Retention and Expansion Research strategies were similar to the 2008 Development Strategies. The review process identified the need to continue similar strategies into the future. Preceding the development of the 2008 Comprehensive Plan an assessment was conducted by St. Cloud State University to determine whether a bioscience park should be established in Monticello. At that time the bioscience industry was an economic development focus statewide. While the attraction of a bioscience business is not a particular focus of Monticello today, there are findings of that study that can be useful to consider in the overall development of economic development strategies for the community. Some of the Monticello's strengths for attracting businesses included: ► Land availability (compared to Metro Area). ► Access to major highways (I-94, U.S. 10 and STH 25). ► Regional growth of employment base. ► Development of local fiber optic system. ► Proximity to universities. ► Overall location. ► Expansive park system. ► Monticello Community Center. Recommended business development activities that apply to the attraction and retention of all businesses include ensuring that there are sites suitable and attractive to potential businesses available and ready for development. The community should continue to explore and establish partnerships with a variety of stakeholders that can work together to support business attraction and retention. This includes the identification of funding sources which may be an incentive for businesses locating in Monticello. When available the City should participate in special tax zones that have been made available at the state and federal level to support business development and retention. Expanding the Tax Base A traditional objective of local economic development planning is the expansion of the property tax base. Under the current system of local government finance, property taxes are the largest source of city revenue. For this reason, it is an important aspect of economic development planning in Monticello. Understanding the Property Tax System Effective strategies to promote the growth of the tax base require a clear understanding of the property tax system. Property Valuation There are three forms of property valuation. The foundation of the property tax system is Estimated Market Value. This amount is the value of a parcel of property as set by the County Assessor. In some circumstances, the State Legislature limits the amount of Estimated Market Value that can be used for taxation. These adjustments result in the Taxable Market Value. The value used to calculate property taxes is Tax Capacity. Tax Capacity Value is a percentage of Taxable Market Value. The percentage factors are set by the State Legislature and vary by class of property. Changes in the Tax System Traditional economic development theory seeks commercial and industrial development as a means of building tax base. Historically, the system supported this approach. A dollar of estimated market value of commercial -industrial property carried a higher tax capacity value than residential property. Over the past twelve years, tax "reforms" by the State Legislature have changed this situation. 2008 Comprehensive Plan — Updated 2013 Economic Development 1 4-3 CITY OF monff(do Destination Innovation PID Owner Size (Acres) 2013 Taxes Zoning .1. ........1.55.-.171...-.000030 ..............................7. X..Bowers. LLC ...................................................................................19.09..........................................$84.1.00....................................B.-4................ 2.........155.-.171-,000040 ...............................John..Chadwi ck..Farms.LLC............................................... 1.9.09. ......................................... $8.78,00.. .................................. B.-4................ 3.........1.55.-.125-.000040 .............................. Ocello..LLC...................................................................................................1...1.,8.5..........................................$6.,452.00 ............................... .B.-3................ 4.........1.55. -.125-.0......411.0 .............................. Wells. Fargo. Bank.NA................................................................6,28.............................................$6.,042.00...............................B-3................. 5.........1.55.-.125-.000070 .............................. Ocello.. LLC.................................................................................................12.96..........................................$7,.055.00...............................B.-3................ 6.........155-500-.142210 .............................. City..of.Monticello...........................................................................4.1.1..............................................$0..00............................................B.-3................ .7...........155.-.151-,003010 .............................. Bradley.&. Sharon.,Larson.....................................................1.78..............................................$2.,950.00...............................B.-4................ s......1.5.5...1.5.7...00.1.0.1.0 ............................Ghana..Prop.exti�s..l~waxy...LP.............................................5.............................................$.G.,..G8.Q..............................B-4. ... ... ... ... 9.........15.5.-.157-.00.102................................ rma..Property.LLC.....................................................................1.67.............................................$9.,.424.0..0............................... B.-4................ 10 ...1.55 171...001021 ...............................4.134 Deegan Av..enue.NE.LLC......................................1.1.6.............................................$6,304.00...............................B-4................ 1.1.....1.55.-.174-.00.1010 .............................. Ghana.. Properties. Family. LP..........................................0.90.............................................$4.,482.00............................... B.-4................ .12.....1.55 151...004010..............................Ohana. Properties Family.LP..........................................0.57.............................................$2>.476,00...............................B-4................ 13.....155.-.193-00,1020 .............................. Highland. Bank................................................................................... 7.02.............................................$7,984.00............................... B.-`1................ 14 ...1.55 164..000030..............................City of Monticello..........................................................................7.20.............................................$0.00...........................................B-4................ 15.....15.5-164-000050 ..............................City.. of Monticello...........................................................................2.1.4.............................................$0.00 ................................................................................... B-4 16.....155-164-000040 ..............................City. of Monticello ...........................................................................6.14.............................................$0.OO............................................B-4................ 17 155 176..002011...............................City ...... ........ of Monticello...........................................................................1.29........................................... ....... ............. ................. ............ .. $0 OO............................................B-4................ ..... 18.....155-.176-00,1020 ..............................City..of Monticello...........................................................................2.70.............................................$0..00............................................B.-4................ 19 ...155-164-000020 ..............................City of Monticello...........................................................................2.83.............................................$0.00...........................................B-4................ 20. ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 155-210-001010 Kleinbank 1.80 $6,160.00 B-3 2.1.....155-221-000010 ..............................Quad Development LLC ......................................................3.80.............................................$6,474.00...............................B-4 .............. 22. ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 155-227-000010 Ocello LLC 43.15 $0.00 B-4 23,.....155.-500-142400 ...............................John & Mary Lundsten...........................................................38.87.........................................$.1,628.00...............................B.-3................. 24. ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 155-213-001010 Glen & Lois Posusta 1.79 $9,800.00 B-3 .... 25.....155-500-142303 .............................. Cityof Monticello...........................................................................3.07.............................................$$0.00............................................B-3 ........................................................................... ............................................. ........................................... . ................ 26.15.5.-500-142300 ..............................City of Monticello 3.20 $0.00 B.-3................ 27. ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 155-500-142104 Premier Bank Minnesota 18.31 $29,934.00 B-4 28.....155-01.8-001020 .............................. Ci..y..of.Monticello...........................................................................5.1.1..............................................$0..00............................................ B.-2................ 29. ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 155-037-001010 Kean of Monticello, Inc 1.92 $4,938.00 B-2 30.....155-050-000020 Joseph Lofromboise Trust .............................................................................................................................................. 3.13 $3 340.00 .......................................................................... IBC 3.1.....155-029-002130 ..............................G&E Properties LLC..................................................................4.1.8..............................................$5,302.00...............................IBC .............. 32.....155-029-002120 ..............................G&E Properties LLC..................................................................2,03..............................................$2.:.940.00...............................IBC............... 33 ...155 029..002110..............................G&E. Properties LLC..................................................................2.1.1..............................................$3>.054.00..............................IBC............... 34.....155-029-,002,100 ..............................G&E Properties..LLC..................................................................2.20.............................................$3.,.186.00...............................IBC............... 35 l..5..5. -.0.2..9..-.0.0.2.0.9..O .............................G&.E Properties LLC 2.28............................................$3,300.00..............................IBC............... 36. ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 155-029-002050 Kenneth Maus 5.40 .$ ,230.00 IBC 37.....155-068-00.1010 .............................. Riverwood. Bank...............................................................................19.35..........................................$30,286.00........................... B.-3................. 38. ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 155-185-001010 State of Minnesota 1.58 $0.00 B-3 39.....155-202-,00,1060 ..............................IRET.Properties.................................................................................0,51..............................................$0..00............................................ B.-3................. 40.....15.5.-079-00101.0 ..............................Tyoti RPatel..............................................................................................0.79.............................................$0.00............................................B.-3................. 41. ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 155-011-000171 Monticello Industrial Park 40.83 $0.00 B2/IBC. 42.....155-212-001010 ..............................Ryan Companies US INC....................................................1.54.............................................$0.00............................................B.-4................ 43 ...1.55 212..001030 ............................ Kean of.Monticello, Inc.......................................................1.09.............................................$0 OO............................................B-4................ 44.....155-178-002030 ..............................Ryan Companies US INC ....................................................1.27.............................................$0.OO............................................B.-4................ 45 ...155 205..001020 .............. Ryan Companies US INC ................................................................1,87.............................................$0 OO...........................................B-4................ 46.....1.5.5-117-002010 ..............................MMC Land Company LLC..............................................5.04.............................................$0.00............................................B.-4................ 47 155 117-001030 MMC Company LLC... 2.24 ........ $0 00 B-4 .............. 48.....1.55.-086-000010 .............................. SPO.. LLC.......................................................................................................0.95.............................................$0..00............................................ B.-2................ 49.....1.5.5.-.196-.000020 ..............................Monticello.. Industrial. Park, ..Inc ...................................1.4 .............................................. $263.00 ..................................... -PUD..._ JKMonticello Destination for Innovation Updated: 4/2016 CHAPTER 3: ZONING DISTRICTS Section 3.6 Industrial Base Zoning Districts Subsection (C) Industrial and Business Campus District Section 3.6 (C) IBCIndustrial and Business Campus District The purpose of the "IBC" industrial business campus district is to provide for the establishment of limited light industrial business offices, limited light manufacturing, wholesale showrooms and related uses in an environment which provides a high level of amenities, including landscaping, preservation of natural features, architectural controls, and other features. Base Lot Area • Minimum = 8,000 sq ft. Base Lot Width • Minimum= 100 ft. Typical IBC Lot Configuration Typical IBC Building Types City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 123 CHAPTER 3: ZONING DISTRICTS Section 3.6 Industrial Base Zoning Districts Subsection (C) Industrial and Business Campus District REQUIRED YARDS (in feet) [I] Max Height (stories Max Floor Area Max Impervious (% Front Interior Street Rear / feet) Ratio (FAR) of gross lot area) Side Side 2 stories All Uses 50 30 50 40 30 feet (Reserved) (Reserved) [2] [ 1 ]: When any yard abuts a zoning district other than I -I or 1-2, the setbacks for the abutting yard must be 50 feet. [2]: Multi -story buildings may be allowed as a conditional use pursuant to Section 2.4(D)contingent upon strict adherence to fire safety code provisions as specified by the International Building Code as adopted in Title 4. Chapter I of the Monticello City Code. Accessory Structures See Section 5.3(B) for all general standards and limitations on accessory structures. Additional In the IBC district, every effort shall be made to preserve natural ponding areas and features of the land Regulations to create passive open space. ■ Section 3.3. Common District Reauirements Other Section 3.60. Standards ADDlicable to All Industrial Base Zoning Districts Regulations Section 4.1. LandscaDinQ_ and Screening_ Standards to Consult Section 4.5. Signs (not all inclusive) Section 4.8. Off -Street Parking Section 4.9. Off -Street Loading ■ Section 4.11. Buildine Materials is Lots must be a minimum ioo feet wide and more than 8000 square feet in total size z: Front yard and side street setbacks of 50 feet are required 3: High amenities and natural features are to highlight development in the IBC district 4: Maximum structure height of 30 feet unless otherwise authorized by conditional use permit Z . 3 5.30 foot interior side yard setbacks required r9o' Max Ht 6. Landscaped parking islands required every 24 spaces in the IBC district 7. Parking areas set back a minimum of 6 feet from property lines #f jr �� • lhdal'strj71 Page 124 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Section 3.6 (D) 1.1 Light Industrial District The purpose of the "I-1," light industrial, district is to provide for the establishment of warehousing and light industrial development. Base Lot Area • Minimum = 20,000 square feet Base Lot Width • Minimum= 100 feet Typical 1-1 Lot Configuration CHAPTER 3: ZONING DISTRICTS Section 3.6 Industrial Base Zoning Districts Subsection (D) 1-I: Light Industrial District Typical 1-1 Building Types City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 125 CHAPTER 3: ZONING DISTRICTS Section 3.6 Industrial Base Zoning Districts Subsection (D) I -I: Light Industrial District REQUIRED YARDS (in feet) [1] Max Height (stories Max Floor Area Max Impervious (% Front Interior Street Rear / feet) Ratio (FAR) of gross lot area) Side Side All Uses 30 15 30 15 2 stories (Reserved) (Reserved) 30 feet [2] [ I ]: When any yard abuts a zoning district other than I -I or 1-2, the setbacks for the abutting yard must be 50 feet. [2]: Multi -story buildings may be allowed as a conditional use pursuant to Section 2.40) contingent upon strict adherence to fire safety code provisions as specified by the International Building Code as adopted in Title 4. Chapter I of the Monticello City Code. Accessory Structures See Section 5.3(B) for all general standards and limitations on accessory structures. ■ Section 3.3. Common District Requirements Other Section 3.60. Standards ADDlicable to All Industrial Base Zoning Districts Regulations • Section 4.1. LandscaDlne and Screening_ Standards to Consult Section 4.5. Signs (not all Section 4.8. Off -Street Parking inclusive) Section 4.9. Off -Street Loading ■ Section 4.11. Building Materials is Minimum street side yard setback of 30 feet. 2: Minimum front yard setback of 3: Minimum lot width of ioo 4et 4: Light manufacturing plant as a permitted use 5: Interior side yard setbacks cf 15 feet 6: Minimum lot size of 2o,000 square feet 7: Rear yard setback of 15 feet, -20.000 SF MINIMUM Page 126 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance CHAPTERS: USE STANDARDS Section 5.1 Use Table Subsection (A) Explanation of Use Table Structure Residential Uses 5.2(C)(1) Attached Dwelling Types 5.2(C)(21(a) - Duplex p C 5.2(C)(2)(b) - Townhouse C p M 5.2(C)(2)(c) - Multiple -Family C P C C 5.2(C)(2)(d) Detached Dwelling p p p p p p None Group Residential P P P P P 5.2(C)(3) Facility, Single Family Group Residential C C C 5.2(C)(3) Facility, Multi -Family Mobile & Manufactured C C C P C 5.2(C)(4) Home / Home Park Civic & Institutional Uses Active Park Facilities P P P P P P P PP P P p p p p None (public) Active Park Facilities P P P P P P P 5.2(D)(I) (private) Assisted Living Facilities C p C I 5.2(D)(2) Cemeteries C C C C C C C C P P C 5.2(D)(3-)! None Clinics/Medical Services Essential Services P P P P P P P P None P P P P P P P Hospitals C PIN P C 5.2(D)-(4-) Nursing/Convalescent C C C C C C C C C PP 5.2(D)(5) Home Passenger Terminal C C C C None Passive Parks and Open P P P P P P P P P P P P p p p None Space Place of Public Assembly C C C C C p C 5.2(D)(6) Public Buildings or Uses C C C C C C C P C C P P C P P 5.2(D)(7) Schools, K-12 C C C C C C I I 5.2(D)(8) Schools, Higher1 None EducationF C Utilities (major) C C C 5.2(D)(9) Office Uses Offices ■ �� P P C P P P P 5.2(E1 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 319 CHAPTER 5: USE STANDARDS Section 5.1 Use Table Subsection (A) Explanation of Use Table Structure Commercial Uses Adult Uses Auction House Auto Repair — Minor Automotive Wash Facilities Bed & Breakfasts Boarding House Brew Pub Business Support Services Commercial Lodging Communications/Broadcasting Convenience Retail Country Club Day Care Centers Entertainment/Recreation, Indoor Commercial Entertainment/Recreation, Outdoor Commercial Financial Institution Funeral Services Kennels (commercial) Landscaping/ Nursery Business Personal Services Production Brewery or Micro -Distillery without Taproom Production Brewery or Micro -Distillery with Taproom or Cocktail Room Recreational Vehicle Camp Site Repair Establishment Restaurants Retail Commercial Uses (other) Specialty Eating Establishments C C P C �� C C• C P C• CICI IP I P P C C P C P PI IP CI PI PIP CIC CP P C P P P P P C I P P P PP C PIP P OP P P I P C I a 3.7(K1 5.2(F)(2) 5.2(F)(3) 5.2(F)(4) 5.2(F)(5) 5.2(F)(6) 5.2(F)(7) None 5.2(F)(8) 5.2(F)(9) 5.2(F)(1 O) 5.2(F)(II) 5.20 (12) 5.2(F)(I 3 5.2(F)(14) 5.2(F)(I 5) 5.2(F)(I 6) 5.2(F)(I 7 5.2(F)(I 8 5.2(F)(22) 5.2(G)(I 01 5.2(F)(24) 5.2(G)(I 11) 5.2(F)(25) 5.2(F)(26) 5.2(F)(27) 5.2(F)(28) 5.2(F)(29) Page 320 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance CHAPTERS: USE STANDARDS Section 5.1 Use Table Subsection (A) Explanation of Use Table Structure Vehicle fuel Sales C C CI 1� 5.2(F)(30) Vehicle Sales and Rental C 5.2(F)(31) Veterinary Facilities C 5.2(F)(32) (Rural) Veterinary Facilities C C C 5.20(32) (Neighborhood) Wholesale Sales P P P None Industrial Uses Auto Repair — Major C �P P 5.2(G)(I) Bulk Fuel Sales and P P 5.2(G)(2) Storage Contractor's Yard, Temporary 5.2(G 3 Extraction of Materials I I I 5.2(G)(4) General Warehousing C C P P 5.2(G)(5) Heavy Manufacturing C 5.2(G)(6) Industrial Services C P None Land Reclamation C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C 5.2(G)(7) Light Manufacturing P P P 5.2(6)(8) Machinery/Truck Repair P P 5.2(G)(9) & Sales Recycling and Salvage C C 5.2(G)( 10) Center Self -Storage Facilities P C P 5.2(G)( I1) Truck or Freight C P P 5.2 G I2 Terminal Waste Disposal & IC 5.2(�(13) Incineration Wrecker Services C P 5.20(14) Commercial Day Care Commercial Lodging C P C C C P C none none 5.2(F)( 12 5.2(F)(8) City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 321 CHAPTERS: USE STANDARDS Section S. I Use Table Subsection (A) Explanation of Use Table Structure Commercial Recreation: Outdoor Convenience Retail Funeral Services Medical / Clinical Services Personal Services Places of Public Assembly Production Brewery or Micro - Distillery with Taproom or Cocktail Room Professional Office -Services Including Financial Institutions Restaurants, Bars < 10,000 SF Restaurants, Bars > 10,000 SF Retail Sales < 10,000 SF Retail Sales > 10,000 SF Retail with Service Specialty Eating Establishments < 10,000 SF Vehicle Fuel Sales Veterinary Facilities Residential — Upper Floors Residential — Street Level Residential — Multiple Family Residential — Townhouse Residential — Single Family Industrial PUD Public Buildings or Uses C C none C P* C C *F-2 Drive Through by CUP — C C = none L-2: NA first floor, C P P P CUP upper floors P P P P L-3: CUP C C C C none C C C C P P P C P P C C P C C P P C C P C C P C C P* P* C* P* C C C* C P C C none L-2: NA first floor, CUP upper floors none none none none L-2: NA first floor, CUP upper floors *Drive Through by CUP L-8 only none P P P P L-2: NA WrC C L-2: NA C C L-2: NA C none C none L-3: PUD Only C I C I C I P I none 5.2(F)(14) 5.2U(! 0) 5.2U(! 6) 5.2U(! 9) 5.20(22) 5.2(F)(23) 5.2(F)(24) 5.2 F 15 5.2(F)(2 1) 5.20 (27) 5.20 (27) 5.2(F)(28) 5.20(28) 5.20(28) 5.20(29) 5.20(30) 5.20(32) Page 322 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Interchange Map Option #1 Legend Proposed Land Uses 0 Commercial W Industrial Medium Density Residential Single Family Residential Gross Land Use Acres: Single Family Residential 1,499 Ac. Medium Density Residential 223 Ac. Commercial 248 Ac. Industrial 116 Ac. Net Land Use Acres (excludes wet areas, greenway & ROW, but incorporates land where existing roads may be removed): Single Family Residential 1040 Ac. Medium Density Residential 146 Ac. Commercial 193 Ac. Industrial 103 Ac. Existing Land Uses Commercial Industrial OInterchange Area /�� Parks and Open Space r-------- i City Boundary -----■ Proposed Roads Existing Roads CConcept Greenway (1000 Ft. Corridor) Wet Areas (Lakes, Rivers, Wetlands) Parcels N 0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. Or/ 4150 Olson Memorial Highway, Ste. 320, Golden Valle V. MN 55422 Telephone: 763.957.1100 Website: www.nacplanning.com Source: NAC, Inc., WSB & Assc., Wright County February 8, 2016 120TH Birch Unnamed a m 100TH Ud La. g Bertram Lake / 1 / m 0 0 0 0 170TH r -- r E Interchange Map Option #2 Legend Proposed Land Uses 0 Commercial W Industrial Medium Density Residential Single Family Residential Gross Land Use Acres: Single Family Residential 940 Ac. Medium Density Residential 123 Ac. Commercial 123 Ac. Industrial 184 Ac. Net Land Use Acres (excludes wet areas, greenway & ROW, but incorporates land where existing roads may be removed): Single Family Residential 769 Ac. Medium Density Residential 115 Ac. Commercial 44 Ac. Industrial 155 Ac. Existing Land Uses Commercial O Interchange Area Industrial Parks and Open Space i --------i City Boundary -----■ Proposed Roads Existing Roads Concept Greenway (1000 Ft. Corridor) Wet Areas (Lakes, Rivers, Wetlands) Parcels N 0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. 4150 Olson Memorial HighwaV, Ste. 320, Golden Valley, MN 55422 Telephone: 763.957.110^ Website: www.nacplanning.com Source: NAC, Inc., WSB & Assc., Wright County 120TH Unnamed Birch 1 1 _. -� i o First Lake 1 100TH /Mud Lake 99TH ; Lake z Bertram Lake � �/ / 9 I 3 u z Interchange Map Option #3 Legend Proposed Land Uses 0 Commercial W Industrial Medium Density Residential Single Family Residential Gross Land Use Acres: Single Family Residential 1,235 Ac. Medium Density Residential 140 Ac. Commercial 405 Ac. Industrial 466 Net Land Use Acres (excludes wet areas, greenway & ROW, but incorporates land where existing roads may be removed): Single Family Residential 941 Ac. Medium Density Residential 127 Ac. Commercial 249 Ac. Industrial 303 Existing Land Uses Commercial Industrial Parks and Open Space r-------- i City Boundary -■ Proposed Roads Existing Roads OInterchange Area Concept Greenway (1000 Ft. Corridor) Wet Areas (Lakes, Rivers, Wetlands) Parcels N 0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. 4150 Olson Memorial Hiqhway, Ste. 320, Golden Valley, MN S5422 Telephone: 763.957.1100 Website: www.nacplanning.com Source: NAC, Inc., WSB & Assc., Wright County February 8, 2016 Interchange Map Option #4 No Build Legend Proposed Land Uses 1w— Medium Density Residential Single Family Residential Gross Land Use Acres: Single Family Residential 1,172 Ac. Medium Density Residential 123 Ac. Net Land Use Acres (excludes wet areas, greenway & ROW, but incorporates land where existing roads may be removed): Single Family Residential 919 Ac. Medium Density Residential 73 Ac. Existing Land Uses Commercial Industrial Parks and Open Space r-------- i City Boundary ------ Proposed Roads Existing Roads Concept Greenway (1000 Ft. Corridor) Wet Areas (Lakes, Rivers, Wetlands) Parcels N 0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. 4150 Olson MemonaI Highway, Ste. 320, 'en valley, MN 55422 Telephone: 763.957.1100 Website: www.nacl)lanning.com Source: NAC, Inc., WSB & Assc., Wright County March 1, 2016 Legend I — — I ICit of Monticello I i Off ici I Zoning M P � � I \ 1 I \ \ I \ \ I \� I \ I \ \ I \ o I \\ 3 \ � I \ \ I � I I ---------— c --- ----_ I — — — — — — — — — — — —I \ Praire Rd Hi W E I \ I � I e�, I BASE ZONING DISTRICTS d Residential DistrictsBusiness Districts i -- Low Residential Densities- \ (k Kama w3 d i i AO R -A R-1 -- Medium Residential Densities T -N R-2 C R -PUD -- High Residential Densities 8-2 8-3 . 8-4 CCD Industrial Districts ] pec 1-1 R-3 ----------, 01 Swan River --------- ; Monticello M -H' PUDs L-------- High School OTHER Water OVERLAY DISTRICTS ----------1 03 il Mills Fleet Farm ----------1 04 1 Red Rooster Performance Based Overlay District Special Use Overlay District Mississippi Wild, Scenic & Rec Overlay District Shoreland District I Freeway Bonus Sign District • • \\�� ` I � c Sys ; h ., � � — \ — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — jfJ/yI►.J[ — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — i I[IIiijm MAN ►■ �■ IIIII �C U � !i ■S = 1111■ ■ 11111111 } -------- City Council Agenda — 06/26/17 4C. Consideration to approve a Development Stage Planned Unit Development and Preliminary Plat for Chelsea Corner for Office, Service, and Warehouse Uses in the Red Rooster Planned Unit Development. Applicant: Red Rooster Properties, Inc. (NAC) Property: Legal: Lot 1, Block 2 (with exceptions), Oakwood Industrial Park; PID 155018002012 Address: 100 Chelsea Road Planning Case Number: 2017-016 A. REFERENCE & BACKGROUND: Request(s): Request to subdivide an existing parcel with multiple buildings to accommodate a new user on the western parcel, and development of a new principal use building and accessory use storage building on newly subdivided parcel for commercial/industrial purposes, through an amendment to an existing Planned Unit Development. Deadline for Decision: July 101h, 2017 Land Use Designation: Places to Shop Zoning Designation: PUD, Planned Unit Development The purpose of the PUD, Planned Unit Development District is to provide greater flexibility in the development of neighborhoods and non-residential areas in order to maximize public values and achieve more creative development outcomes while remaining economically viable and marketable. This is achieved by undertaking a process that results in a development outcome exceeding that which is typically achievable through the conventional zoning district. The City reserves the right to deny the PUD rezoning and direct the developer to re -apply under the standard applicable zoning district. Overlays/Environmental Regulations Applicable: NA Current Site Use: Commercial/Industrial buildings for storage and office Surrounding Land Uses: North: Commercial City Council Agenda — 06/26/17 East: Industrial South: Industrial West: Vacant Commercial Project Description: The applicant is seeking approval of a subdivision to separate a portion of the existing development, with multiple buildings, to accommodate occupancy of a portion of the property by a new user, and development of new buildings for the applicant's commercial/ industrial uses. Both sites would contain a combination of office and storage uses for separate businesses. ANALYSIS Background. The subject property received a Planned Unit Development zoning and approval in 2016 to accommodate the occupancy of the site by the current applicant. That PUD approval permitted the use of the site for office and storage uses by the applicant, as well as limited storage for certain civic organizations seeking temporary storage of equipment used in public events. The 2016 PUD approval accommodated the change in use (from a previous church ownership), and incorporated the then -current level of site improvements, which included fencing, landscaping, and a paved parking lot along the north portion of the site. As a former building materials sales yard, the bulk of the site surrounding the four remaining buildings on the site was unpaved. The proposed project would divide the site into two parcels along a north -south boundary between the westerly 3 buildings and the east portion of the site, which includes a portion of the paved parking, a large concrete pad location of a previous building, and one existing storage building in the southeast corner of the property. The westerly site would be sold to a user that would occupy the main building for office, shop, and storage purposes for an industrial service use. The other two existing buildings are proposed to be used for storage, essentially in their current condition, and for purposes similar to those approved in the 2016 PUD. The easterly site would be occupied by the applicant, and would include a new building in the northeast corner of the property, along with a new parking lot, a future ability to construct an additional accessory building on the empty concrete pad, and use of the existing building for storage. The two parcels would continue to share the current driveway access in common under a cross -parking and access agreement. OJI City Council Agenda — 06/26/17 As noted above, the applicant would use the east parcel, including the new building, the future building, and the existing accessory buildings for the same uses previously approved for the entire parcel under the 2016 PUD. The conditions of that approval included the following: Any expansion of self -storage activities in the PUD District beyond the limited accessory non-commercial self -storage identified in the PUD Site Plan and Narrative shall be subject to an amendment to Planned Unit Development and may require additional improvements, including, but not limited to, paving, curbing, stormwater, and screening. 2. No outdoor storage of materials or equipment shall be permitted in the PUD. 3. Paving and circulation on the site shall be subject to the review and comment of the City Engineer. 4. The applicant enter into a PUD and Development Agreement for the site specifying for the allowable uses and conditions. 5. Conditions recommended by other City staff or the Planning Commission. It is expected that these conditions would carry over to the current PUD project. With regard to new items and proposed improvements raised by the current proposal, staff makes the following observations and recommendations. Existinz Building. The applicant is seeking approval for an Industrial Services use (building maintenance), with accessory office and storage uses within the existing building. Future Building. The applicant is seeking approval of both the first proposed building, and an additional future building to be located on the empty concrete pad, which had previously contained a separate building. No plans or details for the future building have been provided at this time. Staff is recommending that if the City chooses to approve both the proposed and future buildings with this PUD, that the future building approval includes conditions that would require the extension of paved circulation, adequate parking (also paved), building materials and design to be consistent with the existing building on Lot 1, approval of all stormwater and utility recommendations of the City Engineer, and compliance with all other zoning regulations. The future building use should be solely as accessory storage for the principal use in the proposed new building. Landscaping. The existing and proposed landscaping is consistent with the City's zoning regulations, based primarily on previous landscaping requirements imposed at 3 City Council Agenda — 06/26/17 the time of the church occupancy, and then the 2016 PUD. The applicant is proposing to add two deciduous trees to the front yard adjacent to Chelsea Road. Parking. The proposed building is approximately 4900 square feet gross in floor area, with a mix of office and, mostly, storage area. Estimating a maximum parking demand for a commercial/industrial user in such a building at 1 parking space per 350 square feet, would result in a parking requirement of 14 spaces for the new building. The proposed site plan shows 16 provided on the new parcel. The existing building contains approximately 7800 square feet gross floor area. The building will have a mix of office, shop, and storage space, and at the same ratio would require 22 spaces. At least 20 paved spaces are provided, which should suffice given internal net reductions for mechanical, restrooms, etc., and a shared access/parking arrangement with the adjacent parcel. Circulation. The applicant's site plan shows the limits of paving area to be consistent with the existing fence line, which includes the front portion only of the new building. The new building includes both overhead and service door access behind the existing fence line, and as a condition of approval, paving should be extended to access doors for new building, so employees or others are not driving on unpaved surfaces for newly introduced uses. Siznaze. The existing sign will be utilized by the new owner on the west parcel, and small sign will be added for the new building. The proposed new sign is consistent with the requirements for a 15 foot setback for monument/freestanding signs. No other signage is proposed at this time. Any future signage to be added or replaced should meet the requirements of the City's zoning regulations. Trash Handling. The plan anticipates that trash handling equipment will be stored inside the buildings. This would be consistent with the original PUD provisions that prohibit outdoor storage on the property. Buildinz Desizn/Materials. The proposed building is similar in design and materials to the existing building; metal exterior with wood and masonry accents, as well as glass. While the primary exterior materials are not consistent with what the City typically expects of buildings that are in commercial areas, the site is zoned PUD, and adjoins both commercial and industrial property. As a transitional site, the City can consider the proposed materials to be consistent with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed building is set back from the Chelsea Road right of way approximately 93 feet, and 22 feet from the side (east) property line. Lizhtinz The zoning ordinance requires that photometric lighting plan values do not exceed 1.0 foot-candles at the property line, in commercial and industrial areas. The submitted photometric plan shows values that are too high, but do not actually show values at property line. The applicant should revise the photometric plan, and make the required adjustments in lighting fixtures, to meet the requirements of the code. In L! City Council Agenda — 06/26/17 addition, it appears from the lighting detail that light pole height appears to be 28 feet. This detail should be revised to meet the code requirement maximum of 25 feet or less. Preliminary Plat. The applicants are seeking Preliminary Plat approval as a part of the PUD project, dividing the property along a north -south boundary into two lots, as noted above. The plat creates parcels of 1.79 acres (westerly Lot 1) and 1.88 acres (easterly Lot 2). Lot widths along Chelsea Road are approximately 160 feet for Lot 1, and 140.87 feet for Lot 2. As a PUD District, there are no specific lot area or width requirements that apply. For comparison purposes, the past B-2 District would have required 100 feet of lot width, but did not impose a minimum lot area. As noted in the PUD discussion above (and required by Exhibit Z), the City Engineer will comment on grading and utility aspects of the project. Planning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission reviewed this item and held a public hearing on the requests on June 6th, 2017. The applicant, Tom Holthaus of Red Rooster Properties, addressed the Commission, answering questions regarding the proposed industrial service use for the existing building on the westerly lot and the office professional uses proposed for the new building. Mr. Holthaus confirmed that there would be two tenants in the proposed new office building on the easterly lot, Red Rooster Properties and a realty firm. He noted that existing storage buildings on the site would be used for storage for the businesses on site only, with the exception of the option for continued storage for the non-profit community organizations as approved under the original PUD. He explained that although there is not a definitive timeline for the construction of the proposed accessory building on the easterly lot, the current request includes the building in the approval consideration for the PUD amendment. The Commission discussed staff's recommendation that the applicant extend the pavement proposed for the easterly lot's parking and access area to the rear line of the proposed office building, as well as the requirement that the applicant pave the access and parking areas for the proposed accessory storage building on the eastern lot when constructed. Commissioner Murdoff inquired whether there would be a common maintenance agreement for the two properties. The applicant confirmed that there would be a common access and maintenance agreement between the two properties extending from Chelsea to the back of the property, providing for public access to Chelsea, as well as access to the accessory buildings. It was noted that there is no access from Edmonson into the site currently and none is proposed. The Commission members also discussed the building materials treatment for the proposed building on the eastern lot. It was noted that the materials are not consistent 5 City Council Agenda — 06/26/17 with the current standards for building materials in commercial districts, although the materials proposed are consistent with the existing building on the proposed western lot. Chairman Fyle expressed his preference for materials consistent with the commercial building standards, or those of the industrial building adjacent to the east. No members of the public were present to address the Planning Commission regarding the item. Following the discussion, the Planning Commission voted 3-1 to recommend approval of the development stage PUD and preliminary plat, with conditions as noted in Exhibit Z, with a revision to the pavement conditions #4 and 5 allowing for a chip seal product in lieu of pavement. Chairman Fyle voted in dissent, stating his preference for enhanced building materials for the proposed office building. Council will be asked to consider final stage PUD and final plat requests at a future date. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: The Planning Commission recommends Alternative 1 below. Motion to adopt Resolution No. PC -2017- 011 recommending approval of a Preliminary Plat for Chelsea Corner and Development Stage Planned Unit Development for Red Rooster, based on the findings in said resolution, and incorporating the conditions listed in Exhibit Z as recommended by the Planning Commission, allowing for a chip seal or surfacing alternative acceptable to the City Engineer in lieu of pavement for extension to the rear of the proposed office building and accessory building. 2. Motion to adopt Resolution No. PC -2017- 011 recommending approval of a Preliminary Plat for Chelsea Corner and Development Stage Planned Unit Development for Red Rooster, based on the findings in said resolution, and incorporating the conditions listed in Exhibit Z as outlined in the staff report of 6/26/17. 3. Motion to deny approval of a Preliminary Plat for Chelsea Corner and Development Stage Planned Unit Development for Red Rooster, based on findings to be made by the City Council. 4. Motion to table action on approval of a Preliminary Plat for Chelsea Corner and Development Stage Planned Unit Development for Red Rooster, subject to additional information as directed. G City Council Agenda — 06/26/17 C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff is recommending approval of the Preliminary Plat for Chelsea Corner and Development Stage Planned Unit Development for Red Rooster, consistent with Alternative 2, with the conditions as noted in Exhibit Z. The property was originally developed as a lumber yard with multiple metal buildings, and has seen a series of changes to both the land use and zoning regulations, given its location at the transition between commercial and industrial areas. The PUD accommodates uses that have elements of both commercial and industrial activities, and the existing development would raise separate issues in attempting to convert the site to full compliance with commercial zoning regulations. As such, the transitional elements of the proposal appear to be consistent with its location, and with the approvals granted under the 2016 PUD. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Resolution PC -2017-011 B. Draft Ordinance 6X -X, amending Red Rooster PUD (to be considered with final plat and final stage PUD requests) C. Aerial Site Image D. Applicant Narrative, including supplemental information E. Development Plans, including: a. Title Sheet b. Site Plan c. Grading & Erosion Control Plan d. Utility & Removals Plan e. Landscape Plan f. Details g. Photometric Plan h. Building Elevations i. Sign Plan F. Preliminary Plat, Chelsea Corner G. Drainage Calculations, Online Only H. City Engineer's Letter, dated May 31, 2017 Z. Conditions of Approval 7 City Council Agenda — 06/26/17 EXHIBIT Z Preliminary Plat of Chelsea Corner and Development Stage PUD Red Rooster Properties, Inc. 100 Chelsea Road Lot 1, Block 2, Oakwood Industrial Park Any expansion of self -storage activities in the PUD District beyond the limited accessory non-commercial self -storage identified in the PUD Site Plan and Narrative, as approved in the PUD Zoning District, shall be subject to an amendment to Planned Unit Development and may require additional improvements, including, but not limited to, paving, curbing, stormwater, and screening. 2. No outdoor storage of materials or equipment or materials shall be permitted in the PUD. 3. The future building made a part of this PUD shall be consistent in materials, height, design, and color with the currently proposed building. 4. Paving shall be extended to the rear corner of the new office building at the time of construction; Paving shall be further extended to the rear corner of the future storage building at the time of construction of said future building. 6. The applicant shall submit a site and full civil plan set showing the full set of existing, currently proposed, and future building and site improvements as a part of the record Final Stage PUD, including phasing of such buildings and improvements. 7. Lighting and lighting plans in the PUD shall be revised to be consistent with the requirements of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance. 8. Signage shall meet the requirements of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance. 9. Paving and circulation on the site shall be subject to the review and comment of the City Engineer. 10. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations of the City Engineer, per the letter dated May 31St, 2017. 11. The applicant enter into a PUD and Development Agreement for the site specifying for the allowable uses and conditions. The Development N. City Council Agenda — 06/26/17 Agreement shall be accompanied by recordable cross -access and parking agreements for the two parcels. 12. Conditions recommended by other City staff or the Planning Commission. 0 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2017-011 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A PRELIMINARY PLAT OF CHELSEA CORNER AND DEVELOPMENT STAGE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR RED ROOSTER PROPERTIES WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted a request to subdivide its property at 100 Chelsea Road, PID No. 155-018-002012 into two parcels; and WHEREAS, the applicant concurrently proposes to develop the property for business office and accessory storage and industrial service uses, in addition to principal storage for organizations with no other presence on the property; and WHEREAS, the site is guided for commercial uses under the label "Places to Shop" in the City's Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the proposed PUD, along with the companion Plat, are consistent with the long-term use and development of the property for commercial uses; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on June 6, 2017 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: 1. The PUD provides an appropriate means of furthering the intent of the Comprehensive Plan for the site by putting the existing and proposed buildings to limited use. 2. The use of the site for storage for non-profit organizations is consistent with the City's interest in promoting civic charity work and community pride. 3. The proposed improvements on the site under the Development Stage PUD are consistent with the needs of the PUD in this location as a transition between commercial and industrial areas. 4. The improvements will have expected impacts on public services, including sewer, water, stormwater treatment, and traffic which have been planned to serve the property for the development as proposed. 5. The PUD flexibility for the project, including modifying pavement requirements and storage uses, are consistent with the intent of the City's economic development objectives, as well as with the intent of the PUD zoning regulations. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2017-011 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, that the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the Monticello City Council approves the Rezoning and Development Stage PUD, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit Z as follows: 1. Any expansion of self -storage activities in the PUD District beyond the limited accessory non-commercial self -storage identified in the PUD Site Plan and Narrative, as approved in the PUD Zoning District, shall be subject to an amendment to Planned Unit Development and may require additional improvements, including, but not limited to, paving, curbing, stormwater, and screening. 2. No outdoor storage of materials or equipment or materials shall be permitted in the PUD. 3. The future building made a part of this PUD shall be consistent in materials, height, design, and color with the currently proposed building. 4. Chip seal or other surfacing alternative acceptable to the City Engineer in lieu of pavement shall be extended to the rear corner of the new office building at the time of construction; 5. Chip seal or other surfacing alternative acceptable to the City Engineer in lieu of pavement shall be further extended to the rear corner of the future storage building at the time of construction of said future building. 6. The applicant shall submit a site and full civil plan set showing the full set of existing, currently proposed, and future building and site improvements as a part of the record Final Stage PUD, including phasing of such buildings and improvements. 7. Lighting and lighting plans in the PUD shall be revised to be consistent with the requirements of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance. 8. Signage shall meet the requirements of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance. 9. Paving and circulation on the site shall be subject to the review and comment of the City Engineer. 10. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations of the City Engineer, per the letter dated May 31St, 2017. K CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2017-011 11. The applicant enter into a PUD and Development Agreement for the site specifying for the allowable uses and conditions. The Development Agreement shall be accompanied by recordable cross -access and parking agreements for the two parcels. 12. Conditions recommended by other City staff or the Planning Commission. ADOPTED this 6th day of June, 2016, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION Brad Fyle, Chair ATTEST: Angela Schumann, Community Development Director 3 ORDINANCE NO.6XX CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 10 OF THE MONTICELLO CITY CODE, KNOWN AS THE ZONING ORDINANCE, BY AMENDING THE RED ROOSTER PUD ZONING DISTRICT IN THE CITY OF MONTICELLO, CURRENTLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 1, BLOCK 2, OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO HEREBY ORDAINS: Section 1. Section 2.4(0) — Planned Unit Developments, Title 10 — Zoning Ordinance is hereby amended by amending the following: (16) Red Rooster — Chelsea Corner PUD District (a) Purpose. The purpose of the Red Rooster PUD District is to provide for the development of certain real estate subject to the District for office -commercial and industrial services land uses, including the plat of Chelsea Corner. (b) Permitted Uses. Permitted principal uses in the Red Rooster PUD District shall be office -commercial uses as found in the B-2, Limited Business District of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance, and industrial services uses as found in the I-1, Light Industrial District of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance subject to the approved Final Stage Development Plans dated May 23rd, 2016, and as amended on (Council approval date to be inserted), and development agreement dated July 25th, 2016 and as amended on (Council approval date to be inserted), 2017, as may be amended. The introduction of any other use from any district, including Conditional Uses in the B-2 or I-1 Districts, shall be reviewed under the requirements of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 2, Section (0) — Planned Unit Developments for Development Stage PUD and Final Stage PUD. (c) Accessory Uses. Accessory uses shall be those commonly accessory and incidental to office -commercial uses, and as specifically identified by the approved final stage PUD plans. Accessory buildings on the site may be utilized for indoor storage for enterprises which may or may not occupy principal use space on the property and only occasionally have need to utilize the facility, but shall not be operated as self -storage available to the general public. (d) District Performance Standards. Performance standards for the development of any lot in the Red Rooster PUD District shall adhere to the approved final stage PUD plans (including phasing plans) and ORDINANCE NO.6XX development agreement. In such case where any proposed improvement is not addressed by the final stage PUD, then the regulations of the B-2, Limited Business District shall apply. (e) Amendments. Where changes to the PUD are proposed in the manner of use, density, site plan, development layout, building size, mass, or coverage, or any other change, the proposer shall apply for an amendment to the PUD under the terms of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance, Section 2.4 (0)(10). The City may require that substantial changes in overall use of the PUD property be processed as a new project, including a zoning district amendment. Section 2. The zoning map of the City of Monticello is hereby amendment to rezoned the following described parcels from B-2, Limited Business District to Red Rooster PUD, Planned Unit Development District: Lot 1, Block 2, Oakwood Industrial Park. Section 3. The City Clerk is hereby directed to mark the official zoning map to reflect this ordinance. The map shall not be republished at this time. Section 4. The City Clerk is hereby directed to make the changes required by this Ordinance as part of the Official Monticello City Code, Title 10, Zoning Ordinance, and to renumber the tables and chapters accordingly as necessary to provide the intended effect of this Ordinance. The City Clerk is further directed to make necessary corrections to any internal citations that result from said renumbering process, provided that such changes retain the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance as has been adopted. Section 5. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage and publication. The ordinance in its entirety and map shall be posted on the City website after publication. Copies of the complete Ordinance and map are available online and at Monticello City Hall for examination upon request. ADOPTED BYthe Monticello City Council this day of , 2017. ATTEST: Jeff O'Neill, Administrator Brian Stumpf, Mayor 2 ORDINANCE NO.6XX AYES: NAYS: Red Rooster Properties, Inc. -Request for Amdt to PUD, Development Stage PUD, & Preliminary Plat Lot 1, Block 2 Oakwood Industrial Park 1155-018-002012 1 100 Chelsea Road Created by: City of Monticello April 8, 2017 Request: To split lot into two lots, add PUD amendment to accommodate split, to add building on new lot to east. Purpose: To accommodate sale of west portion of property and to make a more efficient use of property that was formerly used as a lumber yard as it is unlikely that a lumber yard will be needed in Monticello. Narrative: Last year Red Rooster applied and was granted a PUD for this property to allow excess space to be used for office, warehouse and self -storage uses. The permitted uses also included limited non-commercial self -storage as an accessory use. We realized that to best utilize this property it would make most sense to split property into two parcels and sell one parcel to someone with a similar business and with similar needs. We have a purchase agreement with Jovan Properties/DBA ProTech. They would be purchasing the main building and the building to the south of the main building.They are a restoration business with 6 to 8 office employees and 6 outside sales agents. They have similar needs as they need office space and warehouse space for equipment and supplies. They have outgrown their current location and would like to expand further in the future. This purchase would allow that. The construction side of their business takes place at customers locations as well as the material deliveries so their need for warehouse space is to accommodate equipment and leftover supplies. Their outside sales agents meet once a week at the office. The level of activity on site would be minimal. The split would accommodate Red Rooster as we could build a new building matching our needs and utilizing the excess space without leasing out as self storage which we do not want to do. Our needs are similar as we have to accommodate a lot of maintenance equipment but also restaurant equipment for replacement and repair, which takes up one of the existing buildings and then some. We are presently donating space to the Monticello Lions and the Monticello Chamber of Commerce which basically uses the second building. If we are to continue donating the space for the Lions and Chamber we would like the ability to also build on the existing slab in the future to accommodate our growth in the future. We are proposing this without improvements to the area around that building as it is not accessible to the public, gets minimal traffic, currently has hard packed gravel base, and has a buffer of asphalt existing before it leads to Chelsea so it doesn't leave mud or debris on the road. We propose to split property North to South at the entrance and have a shared access on the new property line to the South accommodating both parties that both parties would agree to maintain. We feel that the uses described would be a good transition and fit in the current zoning and could be accomplished with an PUD amendment and new plat. Th� nl�lfgu To H I aus Red Rooster Properties, Inc. May 5th 2017 Red Rooster Properties, Inc. understands the financial requirements for the development of the PUD of Chelsea Corner and the financial guarantees for the completion of such improvements. Tom Holthaus President May 15, 2017 RE: Application review Dear Mr. Thunander, Please find response to application review letter dated May 111h, 2017 Clarification of development schedule Plan to start construction as soon as possible after final plat recording. Completion in aprox. 90 to 120 days. Future building on existing slab to be built when necessary not known at this time. Clarification of the types of uses Aside from Red Rooster Properties there will be one tenant Wright Sherburne Realty taking space shown on floor plan already submitted. Exterior lighting Enclosed Specific flexibilities We believe that basically building the same type of building that exists we are complying with the zoning, adding stone, and architectural steel on front as shown on plan. Provide title information Enclosed SWPP Enclosed Trash handling Inside building workshop as shown on floor plan Site plan signatures and setbacks Enclosed Cross Access Agreement Enclosed Thanks, Tom PROJECT BENCHMARK.• Top of hydrant, 30 feet north of centerline of Chelsea Road and 420 feet east of centerline of Edmonson Avenue Elev. = 962.48 Feet (NA VD 88) CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE DIGGING: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL TWIN CITY AREA 651-454-0002 MINNESOTA TOLL FREE 1-800-252-1166 TITLE & INDEX SHEET SITE PLAN OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK o CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA FOR RSD ROOSTER PROPERTIES, SITE IMPROVEMENTS WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN UTILITY & REMOVAL PLAN LANDSCAPE PLAN DETAILS 2 3 0 5 6-7 PINE ST, A IAF `rT -o �2 OPINE ST, W a 0 Ljo Wry Z r- cn o cn O � N LO L f > `n 0 I m m m p W J O Z Z Y � C� Cn Q w U W Q W a� _ J �� U L� c O L- 0)0 o ro - °C O -5 ° ' U c N L o ° d L N +' O Ln �a—Tu°, C; °C 41 .61 c C Z ° C L Lc LJ 00° O a� Q o o� (no W N 0 0 +� oi , W \ U o� ILC) C N Q-•�= J ° +, L Z� N N O "' Z 00 0000 01 r7 N n W Z" p W �(0 r W H W Y W W m OC7Z i jN Z W M Xw li W W >z ♦R �/� d H N C5 04 �wz E1 IN <5 m df Q>Q 0 W qrE �U� NIGH kiq Y 94 � Y OIm m 2Q - a_U U PARK DR. Q 0 F-- CHELSEA RD. v �_ w -Site w �� > o o 0 Q J 3 Q Q Q Y 7- D Q � DUNDAS RD, 0 V) Lv ry 0 LSI Z Z � Lv r1-- O � N U O c� Q w Z LU U � J W W Z > WRIGHT COUNTY NO SCALE D _ m U : U Section 14 Township 121, Range 25 VICINITY MAP z L_ — L — / — / I / I ` / / I L Io o Io U SCALE IN FEET Ld 0 SCALE: 1'' = 10' PROPOSED LIGHT PROPOSED PARKING SUMMARY w POLE Con ven tlonal Spaces 20 — — Hand/cao,oed Spaces 2 UE UEUE UE •UE \ UE UE UE • UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE •-;_- UE UE UE Total Spaces Provided 22 91, Ld� TAPES CURB I ----- —------- =_ ur = = =UL= = =U =_ ------ — — —--------- I� (n (n NO JUI 11�R—UT----UT---- — — -�'— — — ---- — PROPOSED SITE DATA_ I a o I Building 27,126 SF o I \ - 35' 15' 15' 119 I Parkin Areas /0 000 SF `n 41 Parking � I I I Concrete Areas /0,57/ SF m Greensnace Area 34.273 SF 0° m o Ld 5 �- Tota/ Parcel Area 8/, 970 SF w z z w E zz I - ~ Cn J O I o 0 LLJ 0 0 0 N c SBL SBL SBL SBL SBL SBL I I � &RL� SBL SBL SBL SBL ';BL SBL BL SB .2 L L N / U-0C,C O N I I;o� O I 9 aL Ln o I I 1011 -' i I 1 EXIST/NG ZON/NG: B-2 (Limited Business District) � �, + o, � z 1 Minimum Lot Area: No Minimum o E r 9 Minimum Lot Width: l00 feet z N , O C1.2 C 0 0� I m I I I N I I SETBACKS: — g PROPOSED PARKING �� —Denotes buildin setback lines: o a,o � � Q I I _ (B-2) Limited Business District Q• o � (n o I Vk L<, STALLS, TYP. �, Front Yard Setback: 30 feet WIr 612 CURB, TYP. Rear Yard Setback: 20 feet o Side Yard Setback: l0 feetvrn OROPOSED1 / 1 r I I I O I ZV N BITUMINOUS , I SITE PLAN GENERAL NOTES O Z 100 I I I A V E M E N T 1. All dimensions are to top back of curb unless n o N I I , N I I o otherwise noted. � �N m , N 2. All proposed curb to be MNDOT Design B-612 Q W except where noted. W wX I , I J. All parking lot striping to be marked with a Q w< 74' s I a/ky/d-based paint and MnDOT 2564 specific with n m N coats anleast w I 2 td at /t 4" wide. z N r c�zao I I J A^ ° ° ° ° ° ° ° A ° a ° ° ° 1 4. All concrete ramps, sidewalks and van accessible ,' � N N d I I N ° ° ° d ° e ° handicapped parking stalls to conform to current a y �C �N °a ° N i I , ro ° A.D.A. requirements. Q U) z Z wz ,�� ° 5. Typical full size 90° parking stall is 9' X 20' 0 C) _j ��' I �a unless otherwise noted. O� Q -a ow I _jU� –� ° Im allo I , ° I N I I I14 I II MILIJ AND MATCH PEDESTRIAN I PROPOSED 1 LEGEND: I ► E . BITUMINOUS , a°CURB RAMP CONCRETE PANE ENT SECTION ° I SIDEWALK Denotes sanitary manhole I I I ° I ° Denotes telephone pedestal I ° I ° a I Denotes cu/vert I 6 I I ° I Denotes Tree, Coniferous �— I I I I ° I da d Q W I I , I ° `z.rzs` Denotes Tree, Deciduous da d 4 I I N ] I C da -� x -- x -�f—J I I r ° I o � � Denotes bituminous surface _ji I I I I G (D � a l I I I I W a d a Z Denotes concrete surface U) r 1 r I I N I I LU Lr— Q I_L_I Z Denoteswood fence II Z Denotes chainlink fence (1:f Denotes underground Telephone .. r I I I Denotes underground electric — U7 U O d I m I I to I I — — — — — — — —Denotes easement z I I I Denotes righ t of way (D Q w Q a l I I I I I � Denotes building setback Ld z(�U I J I I I � dParking O Stall Count 1 A w Z LLJ Proposed Flared End Section _ O — d � I 1 M U� (n Proposed light pole SHEET N0. Proposed storm sewer 2 / 0 I / I I L INSTALL 10'' FIBER RCP FES LOG, TYP. .j963 ,962 IE=959.00 962 10—LF 12" RCP @ 3.00% \-\\\\10 UE UE UE�\ UE — '�O UE� — — UE � UE � UE UE UE UE � UE UE UE UE — _ INSTALL EROSION 962 i CONTROL BLANKET ----------------_-------------------- -- 62 T— UT UT J ` - = UT � - <C 963_ C� a 9 6 2 963 I I \ �� `— — �,�° 963 0.7% STORM CB RE=962.30 IE=959.30 I I I I I � I I ' PROVIDE ROCK COQ STRIUCTION ENTRAN�E (S - E DLTAILS) I I .25 3.20 3.20 96� 9 .� 9� /� i 3• 963 i FFE=965.6 � , i � 1 i i d j I -� �='X ��63.58 (ME) I � i i r I� i d ° A FFE=964.25 ROOF SLOPE ROOF SLOPE INSTALL 10'' FIBER LOG, TYP. UE UE UJT_:�I EOO X 10 0 10 z 0 I - SCALE IN FEET CnU bi SCALE: III = 101 0 Gradina & Erosion Control Notes I. Contractor shall confine construction operations to the construction limits shown. 2. All work shall conform to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's Storm Water w Permit requirements. Contractor shall obtain NPDES permit and comply with all Q Permit requirements. 0 3. Contractor shall inspect the entire site at least every 7 days and within 24 hours of any measurable rainstorm. Damaged silt fence or other erosion control device w o or practices shall be repaired immediately. Inspection and maintenance of devices z shall continue until the site has undergone final stabilization and a Notice of LEGEND: Denotes major contour Denotes minor contour Proposed Rip Rap X 948.0 Proposed ground elevation Proposed Drainage Flow Proposed Silt Fence Proposed Fiber Log S00 Proposed Major Con tour 800 Proposed Minor Contour Proposed Erosion Control Blanket Proposed Bituminous Surface 00000000000 Proposed Rock Construction Entrance 0 0 0 0 o r ° a Proposed Concrete Surface O Z � M _<J .. W6J� Q of US n I--- Termination is submitted to the MPCA. Z Q 00 Q (D QL N 4. All grading operations shall be conducted in a manner to minimize the U p potential for site erosion. Z W 0LO I Z : 5. The site soil erosion and sediment control facilities shall be installed and M m m Ld 0 Z maintained to conform with the standards specified by the (MPCA). 0 w J O (D Q Z Z Y 26. E Z � Silt fences shall be installed prior the disturbance of any areas and maintained Q w � _ 3 J until all tributary disturbed areas are restored. 0 0 0 U 0 LJ_ 7. All soils tracked onto pavement or any other off—site areas shall be removed o of mU:2 daily. daily. o _0 0_0 (D r7 O 8. The Contractor shall be responsible for the removal of all erosion control a L E, �, ° N o measures, including silt fence and bales, upon establishment of permanent °— 0 o vegetation in said areas. o C z 9. All ditches and areas disturbed during construction shall be restored and vegetated U c ' o 0 as soon as possible. Any finished areas shall be seeded and mulched within ° •° a, z 14 days after finished grading is completed accordance to Mn/Dot 2575. a o o 10. All disturbed areas shall be revegetated with seed mix, mulched, fertilized 0.T ~(n ,� �a 0 II. & disk anchored. Backyard drainage be 1% a=° �� C ° am swales shall graded at a minimum slope. In 12• Inlet protection devices shall be placed in all storm drainage structures 0 L J until vegetation is established on slopes. ° ° �, o T _ol=-:03 C 0 ZN N O "' Z 0),q- 100 0 of LO N n W cl Z" p W Hr W W Y W W M SEEDING SCHEDULE O C7Z zL �w i jN W 00 Seed mix 25-121: 61 Ib/ac. (/� LU LU >Z NN 04 Fertilizer 22-5-10: 350 Ib/ac. Q y C5 04 Mulch Type 1: 2 T/ac. 0 � DZ(D �� U)wZ Ii CO LEGEND: Denotes major contour Denotes minor contour Proposed Rip Rap X 948.0 Proposed ground elevation Proposed Drainage Flow Proposed Silt Fence Proposed Fiber Log S00 Proposed Major Con tour 800 Proposed Minor Contour Proposed Erosion Control Blanket Proposed Bituminous Surface 00000000000 Proposed Rock Construction Entrance 0 0 0 0 o r ° a Proposed Concrete Surface O Z � M _<J .. W6J� Q of US n I--- � Z Q Z Q (D QL U p W Z W Z : 0 Z Q (D Q W (D Z � U Z o _J o _wo Q D_ of mU:2 (D I ~ =I �I \ REMOVE 30 LF PROPOSED BORE EXISTING 0 EXISTING CURB CURB STOP MANHOLE FOR 4" HDPE SANITARY I I WET TAP EXISTING S RVICE - - ! ! SEWER 962 IL o I� I�IIII I II �I l _ rtLII IT / /—rJ-I I IF II I III I I -I t � -962 / �I II I I—► I II I �- 9 �""„q .._] 96/� REMOVE EMOVE IIIIII FENCE _TYP. . u`— uE —ut —`IUE UE .•4• ,\\- / IIIIIII _ nn ' - PROTECT _FEN_CE TYP. _uE 962 W __ 0 964 406 �LFITYPE 0,=\REMOVE PARKING STRIPES IKII COPPER SAW CUT AND REMOVE 157 165 LF - 4 HDPE = SY EXISTING BITUMINOUS SDR 26 @ 2.00% � REMOVE FENCE T PROTEC� FENCE MECHANICAL TO MAE CONNECTIbNTYP. UG 0 4” CLEANOUTS, TYP. o 10 =E / I lit I R��o - ► / � I W O = / I I I A a Q ° ° �° a Q° ° A °a ° Q ° O A av d ° / / d° ° a d v d ad ° ° A av A d A v ° e Q ° ° A Q ° ° a a d ° v ^ ° ° ° e Ad Q ° W I ° V d A v ° Q d v a I v d°Q ° a° ° ° d n v d n ° dO a°a d ° °� ° ° °d a v A A. I I vI n d° I 7 ° d ° ° v A Ad ° ° A O d ° A A ° Q ° A A ° C7 I \ I I ° °v n Q v v n A '04° Q v A a I I A Q° ° Q 8 e ° n° d � ° v e ° ° d a ° Q a v A v A ° / c I ° e v ° Q n I — I UT UT A o° a ° Q° A v ° A Cd Q ° I I I ox: I I--- Ltl Q I I ° v 8 d 5L6 ° ° � ° a v d° � n g d a ° =O i Q� ° a n A Qv W n Q ° V I / a d a ° A° ad a v W I r ----J I i ° °I A A ° A a Q $ A ad I \ e ° a J I v I \o I° — �I' 0 I I7 I ° I I IA 4 A I I0 W I I I2 II o 10CIOne / �D Wo� I a 0 1 I IO I I _ I I �� I a l a \LD L.LJ LEGEND: 20 0 20 Denotes electrical cabinet ® SCALE IN FEET Denotes light pole Z z hydrant Denotes sanitary manhole O Denotes watervalve UTILITY PLAN GENERAL NOTES SCALE: I " = 20' sign CIL Denotes power pole Denotes telephone pedestal I. Underground utilities shown hereon are as per available utility maps Cn Denotes Flared End Section and measurements to visible On–site locate markings. o culvert 2. The contractor is specifically cautioned that the location and/or s� Proposed Sanitary Cleanout wood fence z elevation of existing utilities as shown on these plans are based on Q Denotes records of the various utility companies and limited measurements 0 taken in the field. barbwire fence w J. The contractor must call the appropriate utility company at UJ Denotes underground Telephone least 48 hours before any excavation to request exact field o W — — Denotes overhead electric location of utilities. It shall be the responsibility of the z Denotes contractor to relocate all existing utilities which conflict w wo underground electric ~ O with the proposed improvements shown on the plans. The �z Denotes easement location of utilities shall be obtained by the contractor by J z Denotes right of way calling Gopher State One Call at 1-800-252-1/66 or 811. I\ cn o cn w O Denotes mayor contour z o 4. Prior to construction, the contractor shall obtain the M N necessary federal, state and local permits for the proposed Denotes sanitary sewer o J w work or verify with the owner or engineer that permits have been `n m Denotes I � obtained. Permit fees shall be the responsibility of the contractor O — ~ Denotes waterline unless otherwise arranged with the owner. M M o UJ 5. All electric, telephone and gas extensions and other service lines w cD shall be re–routed and constructed in accordance with the Q w � _ J D D D U D L- specifications of the appropriate utility company. The contractor shall coordinate the service line construction with the utility o companies. ° a s= O N oO 6. All sanitary sewer, storm sewer and water main installations shall a L ° o be in accordance with the city's requirements and the current a) �- C, � z building and plumbing code requirements. aE UJ z 7. All sanitary sewer, storm sewer and water main construction shall o C 0 oN � conform to the City Engineers Association of Minnesota Standard o o Specifications, 20/3 Edition. o -F 0I„ N >� O 8. Coordinate installation of new utilities with the Mechanical plan. z o _ A minimum vertical clearance of 18 inches is required at all O Ute.9. watermain and sewer main crossings. LU N Q 0 J o l0. Manholes in paved areas shall be sumped 0.04 feet and catch basins in gutters sumped 0. IO feet. Rim elevations shown on – ° E these plans reflect sumped elevations. ll. All disturbed roadway areas shall be restored to some thickness Z N and quantity. O Z �� CO00 12. Tracer wire shall be installed along all proposed watermain and oN sanitary services. W y LON l3. Provide minimum 8 feet of cover on all watermains. Insulate any UJ watermains that have less than 8 feet of cover. a LLI a �< �V w M O C,ZZ� i jN w� M �w liCO) W w jz �N c� Cf)wz a O a_ M zJa- >Q .. of W JUS MLd LEGEND: Tree, Deciduous E� Denotes electrical cabinet ® Denotes electric service Denotes light pole Z Denotes hydrant Denotes sanitary manhole ►1 Denotes watervalve Denotes sign CIL Denotes power pole Denotes telephone pedestal ® Denotes electric meter Denotes Flared End Section Denotes culvert Denotes Tree, Coniferous s� Proposed Sanitary Cleanout ` Denotes Tree, Deciduous Z Q Denotes bituminous surface _J 0— Denotes concrete surface _JDenotes wood fence z _J Q Denotes chainlink fence 0 Denotes barbwire fence w 0 Denotes underground Telephone w z W — — Denotes overhead electric z Denotes underground fiber optics w — — — — Denotes underground electric ~ O Q 0 Denotes easement U J z Denotes right of way Q w Q Denotes mayor contour z Denotes minor contour (f)U Denotes sanitary sewer J w z J Denotes storm sewer � O — ~ Denotes waterline M U : /�71– \ – �_ �_ NOTE: CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR I L ALL UNDERGROUND LOCATE REQUIREMENTS. o a- CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE DIGGING: w � GOPHER STATE ONE CALL PROPOSED MAPLE TWIN CITY AREA 651-454-0002 OR 811 j963 —,962 TREE, TYP. MINNESOTA TOLL FREE 1-800-252-1166 OR 811 w 962 • Q 0": C) UE UE UE UE U \ UE I — �—� UE UE UE UE —, UE UE UE UE UE — / UE N ' UE �tlC►UE 962 MOfWMENT SIGN 96j i � �o Ul-- 96 --- ------ — — _ ___ I(n (n - - - - - - - _ �- �!T �1-= I_ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --S UT � �f =�lr= UT = -_— - UT - I UT - - N O T - UT UT - - - - UT -- I I I 963— 10 0 10 °' 963LO � I ---- 1 I SCALE IN FEET m J M m o w SCALE: 1'I = 101 w z z y o I I � � Q w � J I � o 0 0 � o� I CF 0-0 PROPOSED TREE SCHEDULE tS 'oE = N a- z uZ7 v�EC 41L MAPLE (2" DIA.) o O 0)QTY2 0o Z I I _ I , 0-.0 •–T o cn 0 I U C o I I o N U I , n (D vJ o 8 I I I T � o t L �,5= I _oE-o� cn o HARDCOVER CALCULATIONS: / I V DESCRIPTION AREA PERCENT ZN Z PERVIOUS AREA 34,273 SF 41.8% 0 1 00 IMPERVIOUS AREA 47.697 SF 58.2% 000 01 GROSS SITE AREA 81,970 SF 100.0% n LO04 (0 W Vi Z LV W wIL QX / - I i LANDSCAPING NOTES O zz w00 G ° d d ° � Ld 07 A °d ° d ° ° d° d 'd ° W w H I ° d ° d °° d d °d d ° ° ° ° ° d d ° d d °a ° ° I. Areas not paved and to be landscaped shall receive minimum of jz N04 °c ° ° d d G° ° ° ° ° e 4 depth as measured in place of topsoil. All graded slopes greater than or equal Q y �� NN I I ° – d ° a ° ° c d ° d e to 4: I shall be covered by erosion control blanket after topsoil has been placed. cnwz I ° ° 2. Tree protection fence shall be installed and reviewed by the City prior to the 0 zJ� � •. c commencement of grading. Establish other tree injury prevention measures as Q?Q on ° I ° I recommended by a qualified tree care specialist. –<J C- on I , ° I \ I I I d I n I d I ° I �— d I a I , Q I I d° I ° d� as 4 I I XXJLLA]] I ' I X— X I I I C I (� / I I W � Z I I � Z � —JI L�.J I I Q wLLJ Q Z w U 0 o -J o �wz z / / I = 0 Q m U :2-J SHEET NO. / � I PAVEMENT MAXIMUM RED COLOR SLOPE 2% IN ALL DIRECTIONS. CONCRETE WITH TRUNCATED DOMES PER ADA SPECIFICATIONS „ _ -„--SIGN POST WITH s -0 5 0 � 6 o JACCESSIBILITY I SYMBOL (TYP) ° d° • n a 4 < ° ,SLOEE UP -SCOk UP ° ° 1:12 ..�... s 1:12 4 • ° ° ° ° n e • •• •• a ° ° ° a a ••P• •922 °FACE OF WALK • G ° ::: ::: ::.::.:a ° ° a ✓ ° OR CURB 4” WIDE YELLOW PAINT STRIPES (TYP.) 96" min. FOR VAN ACCESS ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES SHALL BE IDENTIFIED BY A SIGN SHOWING THE INTERNATIONAL SYMBOL OF ACCESSIBILITY COMPLYING WITH ANSI 4.28.8. SIGNS SHALL NOT BE OBSCURED BY A VEHICLE PARKED IN THE SPACE. SEE DETAIL REMOVE C FROM CUR CONCRETE 96" min. — INTERNATIONAL SYMBOL OF ACCESSIBILITY; YELLOW —4" PAINTED STRIPING 1'-6" O.C. AT 450 (YELLOW REFLECTIVE) ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE AND HANDICAP RAMP s 36 1/211 NI__ CURB BOX ADJUSTABLE 6" TO 9" 35 1 /411 - 1 7/811 r, 11 511 611 17 3/411 3 1/8 " � 33 � � s 15 (/211 3611 2411 s will— s a 4,311 3 1 11 CASTINGS SHALL BE NEENAH R -3067—L OR EQUAL STANDARD INLET CASTING OUTFALL GUTTER II If 6 � I �I/2"R — __ TOP BIT. MAT 311R \ 3/4" PER FT_ ' —/ 4 „ °a N I BASE 1 4, 4 f� 1 ° I I+■ ° I 1 I1 12" 1 8" 1 STANDARD GUTTER Lt 6 II— j I /—I/211R — - TOP BIT. MAT— � a \ _ 3/8" 3 1 ° ° 11 ° - \ 3RD — L — J= — 3/4" PER FT. a a �I a BASE I a ° ° �I I A—_ I I 11 811 I L I 1211 1 8 1 B-612 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER USE 4" OR 6" CISP PLUG AND CAP. - TOP TO BEI�2" BELOW EXISTING GROUND VARIES 10' TO 20' TIES REQUIRED TO CLEAN OUTS FINISHED GRADE i I I 6' PVC RISER FOR COMMERCIAL 4" PVC RSER FOR RESIDENTIAL 'q BEND 4' OR G" VERTICAL WYE IPVC) I 2000 PSI CONCRETE ENCASEMENT 12' ALL AROUND (INCIDENTAL) r MATER TIGHT GASKET OR CEMENTED PLUG �- ------------��------------ IPVC HORIZONTAL NYE (PVC) 1. PAYMENT FOR 6' RISER PIPE. 6' VERTICCL WYE 45' BEND AND PLUG WILL BE PAID FOR AT UNIT PRICE BID PER EACH. ' 2. CLEAN -OUTS REQUIRED AT 70' INTERVALS FROM MAIN SEWER LINE. Title: Sanitary Clean -Out Standard Plate Library for the City of Monticello bate: 03-05 Plate No. Revised: I 3005 if 1211 MIN 10 FT MAX COVER 12" MIN CAREFULLY COMPACTED SELECT GRANULAR MATERIAL PER MNDOT SPEC 3149.2D Bc MODIFIED TO 100% PASSING THE I" SIEVE MAX LIFT OF 8" LOOSE THICKNESS COMPACTED TO 95% STANDARD PROCTOR \OHO O0O0OC15% Bc � `p0 o <0 6th Ido o I I--0.5 Bc--l THE BOTTOM OF THE TRENCH SHALL BE SHAPED TO FIT THE PIPE BARREL FOR AT LEAST 50% OF THE OUTSIDE PIPE DIAMETER. UL_u u 11VV 1�1r 1 TRIAL PER MN /DOT SPEC 3149.2E COMPACTED TO 95% STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY CLASS B BEDDING NOTE: THE ZONE IMMEDIATELY BENEATH THE PIPE SHALL BE COMPACTED SUFFICIENTLY TO PRODUCE A UNIFORM SUPPORT HDPE DUAL WALL PIPE BEDDING TOP OF PROPOSED SUBGRADE THE TOP 3' SHALL BE COMPACTED AT A MIN OF 100% OF STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY (MN/DOT 2105) A MAX OF 2' LIFTS TO BE WETTED AND CONSOLIDATED BY VIBRATORY MEANS AND COMPACTED TO A MIN OF 95% OF STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY (MN/DOT 2105) 4' COVER COMPACTED TO 95% OF STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY WITHOUT THE USE OF HEAVY ROLLER EQUIPMENT x GRANULAR BEDDING AS PER MN/DOT 3149.21' GRANULAR FOUNDATION WHERE ORDERED BY THE ENGINEER SHOVEL, PLACE, AND HAND COMPACT AROUND PIPE TO 12" ABOVE PIPE. VIBRATORY COMPACTION REQUIRED EACH SIDE OF PIPE, AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. I"Standard Plate Library for - the City of Monticello Title: Typical Trench Compaction and Class B Bedding Date: 03_05 Plate No. Revised: 02-06 3006 NOTE: CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF M ON TI CELLO STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAILS TOP OF CURB CONCRETE GUTTER CURB AND GUTTER TAPER DETAIL PIPE SIZE d < 30" 3" 30" 60" 4" > 60" 6" 1/8 COVER OVER PIPE 6 MIN CAREFULLY COMPACTE GRANULAR SELECTED T Bc MATERIAL. Bc >oo000cJ_6 Bco OO O O OOC I If —0.5 Bch I I 4f -0.5 Bc--I THE BOTTOM OF THE TRENCH SHALL FINE GRANULAR FILL MATERIAL BE SHAPED TO FIT THE PIPE BARREL FOR AT LEAST 50% OF THE CAREFULLY COMPACTED OUTSIDE PIPE DIAMETER. THE MAXIMUM SIZE PARTICLE ALLOWED IS 3/8". OVER EXCAVATED TRENCH CONDITION STD TRENCH CONDITION REFERENCE: NOTE: CONCRETE PIPE DESIGN MANUAL FOR ROCK OR OTHER INCOMPRESSIBLE MATERIALS, THE TRENCH SHOULD BE OVEREXCAVATED A MINIMUM OF 6" PREPARED BY AMERICAN CONCRETE PIPE INSTITUTE AND REFILLED WITH GRANULAR MATERIAL. CLASS C PIPE BEDDING w a 0 O w Z I- (n o (n O N M� Z p O 00 0000 � of N li 1' W W DO U) nj� C5 H N I 0 O Ln LLI r o � W M M m o w w O 0 J O c� (n Q w 0 w Q W a� _ J 0 0 0 U 0 LL. N C o L. J J w Z < a0� _ O U E U :2 0 aL°�o Ln Ino -°'.0 6 Co'�� C L C z +'w•- z -0-0 o C U O C:) +� a� Cf) (no a U) 0�� U \ C U (U Q.� J L 0-0 — ) (n D - o E -o ZN LO N O N M� Z p W 00 0000 W of n C)(3 LO N W In to z I n p W Z W Hr W li 1' W W DO n C)(3 H CD N I jN O Z W 00 Lj LTJ li W LL1 >z nj� C5 H N I ♦R �wz 0 LLI �'(2) O QJE (0r z—W r- .. M JUS W �Q OJ n I-- - � Z V^^ L� W Of 0 LLI Z � W I— O w O 0 U V < W Z � U N J J w Z < _ Ld M U :2 o ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES SHALL BE IDENTIFIED BY A SIGN SHOWING THE INTERNATIONAL SYMBOL OF ACCESSIBILITY COMPLYING WITH ANSI 4.28.8. SIGNS SHALL NOT BE OBSCURED BY A VEHICLE PARKED IN THE SPACE. ANSI 4.28.5 FINISH AND CONTRAST • POSTS TO BE THE CHARACTERS, SYMBOLS AND BACKGROUND PRE -PAINTED GALVANIZED STEEL OF SIGN SHALL BE EGGSHELL, MATTE, OR OTHER NON -GLARE FINISH. CHARACTERS AND SYMBOLS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND, WITH EITHER LIGHT CHARACTERS ON A DARK BACKGROUND OR DARK CHARACTERS ON A LIGHT BACKGROUND. 12" 1 Proposed signs to be placed in accordance BLUE- — - with the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MMUTCD). WHITE— m REFLECTIVE FACE A>B MATERIAL PABMG 80 Go. Alum. + HANN,EL POST (2# Ft.) 5 -5" LONG, cO v— E SURFACE 4' 4" SLOPED Y CONCRETE tea¢ Flo pA°�� co 0 600' I I o �B I I V ° 16u ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN DETAIL s PAVE WEAR COURSE s 1' WIDE MILL 1 " DEEP EX. PARKING LOT SECTION STRAIGHT LINE SAWCUT EX. BIT. FOR REMOVAL PROPOSED WEAR COURSE, - BASE COURSE & AGGREGATE BASE MATCH EXISTING BITUMINOUS SURFACING SPECIAL NOTE: SPECIAL ATTENTION SHALL BE PAID WHEN INSTALLING DRIVEWAYS TO NOT UNDERMINE OR DAMAGE EXISTING SIDEWALKS. 3" OF 1-1/2" ROCK / l ON TOP OF / 6' CRUSHED CONCRETE"OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT / TAPER DEPTH AND WIDTH IN 1 D' SIDEWALK CURB & GUTTER �3" OF 1-1/2" ROCK ON TOP OF 3" CRUSHED CONCRETE Title: Standard Plate Construction CST ;oF , st uction Entrance Monti Library for Qate: Q —d5 Plate No. the City of Monticello ReA9ed: 5015 06-14 t 1 i ► � I I1 A p A A — 1 1/2" BITUMINOUS MAT (Mn/DOT 2360 — SP WEA240B) — TACK COAT (Mn/DOT 2357) —2" BITUMINOUS MAT (Mn/DOT 2360 — SPN WB230B) 6" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE (Mn/DOT 3138) COMPACTED SUBGRADE (Mn/DOT 2105, 2111) TYPICAL BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SECTION VARIES 6x6 W2.9xW2.9 WWF SLOPE VARIES e ° a 1. ° ° °� 6" CONCRETE a COMPACTED SUBGRADE 95 % MODIFIED PROCTOR TYPICAL CONCRETE PAVEMENT SECTION VARIES BROOM FINISH SLOPE VARIES a ° ° 4" CONCRETE a ° e e COMPACTED SUBGRADE 95 % MODIFIED PROCTOR TYPICAL SIDEWALK SECTION TYPICAL MATERIAL SECTIONS LED 900 SHOEBOX NOTE: CHECK WITH OWNER FOR SUPPLIER OF LIGHTS AND MATERIALS LIGHT POLE FOUNDATION i ABOVE GRADE POLE HEIGHT BASE HT. ad ° c BELOW `6 4 GRADE / o ° a ° LIGHT POLE DETAIL 1211 THICK RUNOFF WATER 1811 MINIMUM WITH SEDIMENT III , ; 1 Or — — 1 I 1 11= SEDIMENT FILTERED WATE --CLEAR ROCK (3/411 TO 1 1/211) 411 PVC OVERFLOW PIPE WITH 1/211 PERFORATIONS o°o°o° °°°oooooo °°o°o°°o°°°°° o°o°o° II - PA � 01VI I ' WIRE MESH (1/211 BY 1/21') CATCH BASIN SEDIMENTATION BARRIER nrrl r -r1 -r In nl A Tr EXPAN JOINT I II VI I I LVVV I P1U1\IV —" —"—"— CATCH BASIN INLET PROTECTION A 0 I c 41-011 1`0-------------► 2'-011 —� I I I I of -11 (I �000000000000000010000000000000� >a 0 0 0 0 o° O O 0 0 00° 00° 0° 00 0a 0° 0 °°°°< 0 0 0 0 0 0°0a0p 00° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i°o°o°o°o°o°o°o°o°o°o°o°o°o°o°o°o� �onOnOnOnOnO"O'On nO"OnOnOnOnOnOn( EDGE OF LANDING FIBER LOGS )NG WOODEN STAKES DRIVE THROUGH 2"x2"x4' WOOD ' OF ko FFFF NN((�� ST'ROPEXE "SILT STOP" FABRIC 2' 6" BLY MIN / 10' MINIMUM i EXISTING GROUND BACKFILL % BURY BOTTOM 6" OF FABRIC PROPOSE EMBANKMENT NOTE: SILT FENCE I. SILT FENCES CONSTRUCTED WITH SUPPORT FENCES, POSTS SHALL BE SPACED AT 10' OR LESS, AND DRIVEN AT LEAST 2' INTO THE GROUND. 2. SILT FENCES CONSTRUCTED WITHOUT SUPPORT FENCES, POST SHALL BE SPACED AT 4' OR LESS, AND DRIVEN AT LEAST 3' INTO THE GROUND. 67 1:48 MAX. SLOPE IN ANY DIRECTION FOR LANDING AREA EDGE OF RAMP 1:12 MAX. RUNNING SLOPE 1:48 MAX. CROSS SLOPE FOR RAMP I: 10 MAX. FLARED SIDES SLOPE DETECTABLE WARNING B-612 CURB AND GUTTER 6'-0" I 41-011 6'-0" (5' MIN.) I (3' MIN.) 1 (5' MIN. A EXPANSION JOINT PLAN CURB OR EXPANSION CURB &GUTTERL — — — —6'—p"— — — — J JOINT I ----------- --- _ i I I: 20 1 MAX. —PL COUNTER L — 4" CONC. SLOPE SECTION A—A MAIN ENTRANCE PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP FILTER FABRIC ( A EROSION CONTROL MEASURES n21 SECTION B -B B 4 I I 4 B L PLAN NOTE: RIP -RAP SHALL BE INSTALLED TO PROVIDE EASY REMOVAL OF TRASH GUARD. Q _�: oa 0_ w� �O T_ FILTER FABRIC RIP -RAP A TABLE OF QUANTTIES SECTION A—A NOTE: CLASS 3 N 0)� DIA. PIPE SIZES LARGER d50 = 9" FILTER ROUND L THAN OR EQUAL TO FABRIC Q GEOTEXTILE FABRIC, RIP RAP SHALL COVER THE AREA (IN.) FT. 18" DEPTH CULVERT APRON 3 FT. 0' Cu. YD. SQ.YD. 12" 8 6.9 8 15" 8 7.1 9 18" 10 8.9 12 21" 10 10.4 13 24" 12 11.9 17 30" 15 14.0 21 SECTION A—A RIP -RAP INSTALLATION Z O li U V) W 0 W NOTE: O N 0)� " Z PIPE SIZES LARGER THAN THOSE SHOWN REQUIRE A SPECIAL DESIGN (D FOR PIPES GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO 30". USE 1.5' Q GEOTEXTILE FABRIC, MnDOT SPEC. 3733, SHALL COVER THE AREA > W0 OF THE RIPRAP AND EXTEND UNDER THE CULVERT APRON 3 FT. RIP -RAP INSTALLATION Z O li U V) W 0 W r0 N O N 0)� " Z rn� W CO 00 CO a 0 bjwfyo D < > W0 �N a CO D U 0' �wz I- cn o cn O O W � 0)N 0 O U J ° O �^ V QLij � ZlijU o M N M m 0 Ld J O < z Z Y � W 0 Cf)Q w U w o Q W 0' _ J U 0 LIL. o L o� °_0 O U E L 0-L ° a� + Ln �°—�u°i °C '0) C; o ° C L C C z Z' W - -0o� C O °o° a� Q oo4o N -E(DToCn a�� (no L.L cV m a� _F Cn 0 U ,W \ C U N I, N Q_•� J ° N +, i L L i' D (n /) 0 D — o E -° ZN r0 N O N 0)� " Z rn� W CO 00 CO w00 0 n Q(� r0 N W n " Z p W �r- r- w00 H bjwfyo /Z V < IM n Q(� H C7Z N i jN O w00 bjwfyo /Z V w Lij jz �N a CO D U N I �wz 0 d LiJ a(ro) OQJLo W J>Q of US �bi Q /Z V p LiJ Z � W � 0 O U J �^ V QLij ZlijU N J UJ Z < _ W M U o w a d U � U 3� 4.1.mu.W :, q—a 1Otluew o �1a40:""'Jld LLOULL&A-a M.0 •e ARn U3znoa Lnalv� BupyBr7 --3 a•c7a4O :aweN 4-P U-10--M-od pdedmd !€i .. � .. .• i,�-{ - F O L, E N E N w >- J- 'k ' 6`-4 : 60 • fits - iib : •�� iN ,;, ,•N � : a.`�' -• F O L, E N E N w >- J- 'k ' 60 • fits - iib : •�� iN ,;, ,•N � : a.`�' -• V 00 i---^`'-+,-.,fir--�"-�'•--.-�,L�- - : _ M. N ��.-._..:_ .��:.-:'._,. iV R • N C, LI) ..O':': Lo:'"' yN . �N •N. •(N •� +� 1 40 -j •C) �D C) •CD •p, �p F O L, E N E N w >- I t - _Q Q0 6A nn{ J 9focl v� PARK DR. —T4 Site I -DMDAS RD. I I I I I I I I IN I I I I I NO SCALE Sec. 14, Twp. 121, Rng. 25, Wright County, MN VICINITY MAP CURVE INFORMATION Cl Delta=16030'00" L=21.81 R=75.73 LINE INFORMATION L I N73 °30'00 " 25.80 EXISTING PROPERTY DESCRIPTION. (from Title Commitment No. 0J06,3-17) Lot 1, Block 2, OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK, according to the plat on file and of record in the Office of the Register of Deeds, in and for Wright County, Minnesota, except the South /00 feet thereof. And also excepting: That part of Lot 1, Block 2, OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK, City of Monticello, that lies East of a line drawn 331.5 feet West pf and parallel to the East line of said Lots as measured at right angles thereto, according to plat on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, in and for the County of Wright, State of Minnesota. PROPOSED PARCEL AREA: Lot 1, Block 1-1.79 acres (77,968 SF) Lot 2, Block 1-1.88 acres (81,970 SF) SURVEYORS NOTES: l) Parcel address: l00 Che/sea Road Monticello, MN 2) PID No 155-018-002012 3) Trees were located individually for the purposes of this survey. SOILS CHART (Entire site is comprised of the single following soil type) Map symbol & soil name Hydrologic Water table group dep th (cm) 406; Dorset sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes B >200 CHELSEA CORNER (PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT) CITY OF MONT/CELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MN 0 50 I Inch = 50 Feet PID /55-0/8-00/0/2 ' City of Monticello PID /55-0/8-00/020 — � City of Monticello — 6 � � � � I II g g6 00 ,. , . /. A x-962 • ' X90000'00"E I J N90000'60"'E 46-11 _crPSH 4W. 06 - N90°00'00"E 33/.50 \P �q3 62 H I UE UE \Dc A,00 I I s%%—s�6�� ( seg --' W N I — north line of Lot 1, Block 2 —/Oft utility easement per I I TN a I OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK I l� 33/.50--------------------------� FtL I II I I� I III I m ` �— I / /0 ► o a I I /0 m I l o U g � I I pole building / j 2 S8 38 45 I I� I I / 5/.6 '. �I14 I ' I ' �� s I I �_ 'o I 50ft transmission --ocn ine easement per I i ;•, ','� •� % / . / /. / % . . 3 �I 50 — Doc No 55663/ I I I I R Q PID 155-0/8-0020/1 p 9' B l o I I One .o W K Properties LLC o I I� o 1.1 I I I c of pole building D Z P ' I I I I Ino, I '• ,`, ,dw. f I I �y / 1 / r r I I I I I I� , I ' N-1 � I m N pole building � I "� I I / � •� / I I / 2 01 to ' pole building / `ur I y �D LU I g65I I north line of the 0b 964 � I — South e of � I I o 1, BB 2� I— yes Jes— I3 �622les tae' f -� -- J r------- - J 1 * N 1 0 e j l� �►�n°au PID /55-0/8-0020/3 o I I I Chihos Equities LLC o I south line of I — Lot 1, Block 2 I I f ,551—----------------------------I----------------------------------I —1 N90 °00'00 "E 332.27 •T N90 000'00 "E 331.50 \ I2, OP BO WART PEDERSON, & ASSOCIATES, INC. For the purpose of this survey, the North line of Lot 1, Block 2, OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK, has a bearing of North 90 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds East based on the Wright County Coordinate System NAD83 (1986). O Denotes 1/2 inch x /4 inch iron monument set with a plastic plug stamped R.L.S. 44360. • Denotes iron monument found. Denotes cast iron monument. Drainage and Utility Easements are shown thus: II 6 II --12�--- II II I L----+12— NOT TO SCALE Being 12 feet in width and adjoining right of way lines and plat boundary lines, also being 6 feet in width and adjoining lot lines, unless otherwise indicated, as shown on the plat. REFERENCE BENCHMARK: MnDOT Geodetic Database Station 8605 J, Stamped 8605 J 1967 Elevation = 959.25 (NAVD 88) PROJECT BENCHMARK: Top of Hydrant 30 ft north of centerline of Chelsea Road and 420 ft east of centerline of Edmonson Avenue Elevation = 962.48 (NAVD 88) OWNER & DEVELOPER: Red Rooster Properties, Inc. Tom Holthaus 9495 Deegan Avenue NE Monticello MN 55362 SURVEYORS & ENGINEERS.• Bogart, Pederson & Associates, Inc. 13076 First Street Becker, MN 55308-9322 763-262-8822 ZONING: B-2 Limited Business District Red Rooster PUD MINIMUMS: 100 feet Width Denotes Building Setbacks: SBL SBL 30' from front 20' from rear 10' from interior side, 20' from street side DATE: 5/5/17 FIELD DATE: 4/10/17 BK/PG: — DRAWN BY: ssb CHECKED BY: ssb, jd DWG FILE: 17-0112.00 FILE NO: 17-0112.00 REVISIONS: I hereby certify that this survey, plan, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Signed: Shannon Bollman Date: Lic. No. 44360 BOGART, PEDERSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. LAND SURVEYING CIVIL ENGINEERING MAPPING 13076 FIRST STREET, BECKER, MN 55308-9322 TEL: 763-262-8822 FAX: 763-262-8844 PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR Red Rooster Properties, Inc. Tom Holthaus City of Monticello Wright County, MN Bogart, Pederson & Associates, Inc. LAND SURVEYING CIVIL ENGINEERING MAPPING DRAINAGE CAILCCILAlI'M1�1` S fair 100 Chelsea Rd. Drainage to Chelsea Rd. ROW City of hVli onticeflo, Wright County, MI`s Prepared for: Red Rooster Properties, Me. Date: May 4, 2017 Prepared by: Jeffrey Swanson I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Engineer under the State of Minnesota Statues Sections 326.02 to 326.16 Jeffrey Swanson, P.E. Date: 5/4/2017 Reg. No. 50203 Main Office: Becker Phone: 763/262-8822 13076 First Street Toll free: 888/210-8301 Becker, MN 55308 Fax: 763/262-8844 1. SITE LOCATION AND EXISTING CONDITIONS: Site location: The site is located on Chelsea Road in the City of Monticello. Existing Site Conditions: The site is currently vacant. Total site area = 1.88 acres. Surrounding Land Uses: The property is part of an business/industrial park. Onsite Soils: The onsite soils are primarily Dorser sandy loam. These soils are considered a hydrologic group type `B". 2. PROPOSED SITE IMPROVEMENTS Proposed construction includes an office building, serviced by the proposed paved parking lot in front of the building. The total new impervious area will be 0.24 acre. Grading will take place on 0.35 acres on the site. 3. STORMWATER MANAGMENT Curb and gutter of the proposed parking lot will contain runoff from the driveway and the parking lot. The catch basin will discharge the runoff from the parking lot to the road ditch. A swale will be constructed east of the parking lot and building which will drain to the roadway ditch and prevent any roof runoff from draining east on to the neighboring property. The HydroCAD analysis is attached for the existing and proposed conditions. The 10 year peak flow through the catch basin is 1.91 cfs @ 2.97 fps through the 12" RCP pipe. The discharge rate of the road ditch east of the driveway entrance is as follows: Ditch Discharge Summary Table Discharge 2 year event Existing (0.5 AC) 10.83 cfs Proposed (0.9 AC) 2.06 cfs 10 year event 1100 year event 1.42 cfs 2.78 cfs 3.33 cfs 6.03 cfs The discharge rate of the undisturbed area south of the proposed building that flows to the eastern property is as follows: Offsite Discharge Summary Table Discharge 12 year event 10 year event 100 year event Existing (0.9 AC) 2.61 cfs 4.06 cfs 6.91 cfs Proposed (0.5 AC) 1.42 cfs 2.18 cfs 3.68 cfs 4. NPDES CONSIDERATIONS Since the project will disturb less than 1 acre, a Stormwater Permit for Construction is not required. CB 1P F2R] NW. Ditch NW. Ex. Parking NE. Ex. Parking & Building & Conc. h E of Driveway �A To E. of Site Subcat Reach Aon LinkRouting Diagram for Existing Prepared by BPA, Printed 5/4/2017 I HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Existing Prepared by BPA HvdroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Area Listing (all nodes) Area CN Description (acres) (subcatchment-numbers) 0.085 79 <50% Grass cover, Poor, HSG B (3S) 0.242 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B (1S) 0.529 96 Gravel surface, HSG C (3S) 0.590 98 Paved parking, HSG C (2S, 3S) 1.445 90 TOTAL AREA Existing Conditions Printed 5/4/2017 Paae 2 Existing Conditions Existing Type 11 24 -hr 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81 " Prepared by BPA Printed 5/4/2017 HvdroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 3 Time span=1.00-72.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 7101 points Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN Reach routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method Subcatchment 1S: NW. Ditch Runoff Area=10,522 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=0.30" Tc=15.0 min CN=61 Runoff=0.05 cfs 0.006 of Subcatchment 2S: NW. Ex. Parking Runoff Area=11,491 sf 100.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.58" Tc=15.0 min CN=98 Runoff=0.79 cfs 0.057 of Subcatchment 3S: NE. Ex. Parking & Runoff Area=40,933 sf 34.66% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.26" Tc=15.0 min CN=95 Runoff=2.61 cfs 0.177 of Reach 211: N. Ditch E of Driveway Inflow=0.83 cfs 0.063 of Outflow=0.83 cfs 0.063 of Pond 1P: N. Culvert Peak Elev=961.55' Inflow=0.05 cfs 0.006 of Outflow=0.05 cfs 0.006 of Pond 3P: To E. of Site Inflow=2.61 cfs 0.177 of Primary=2.61 cfs 0.177 of Total Runoff Area = 1.445 ac Runoff Volume = 0.240 of Average Runoff Depth = 1.99" 59.20% Pervious = 0.856 ac 40.80% Impervious = 0.590 ac Existing Conditions Existing Type 11 24 -hr 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81 " Prepared by BPA Printed 5/4/2017 HvdroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paoe 4 Summary for Subcatchment 1 S: NW. Ditch Runoff = 0.05 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 0.006 af, Depth= 0.30" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24 -hr 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81" Area (sf) CN Description 10,522 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 10,522 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 2S: NW. Ex. Parking Runoff = 0.79 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.057 af, Depth= 2.58" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24 -hr 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81" Area (sf) CN Description 11,491 98 Paved parking, HSG C 11,491 100.00% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 3S: NE. Ex. Parking & Building & Conc. Runoff = 2.61 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.177 af, Depth= 2.26" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24 -hr 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81" Area (sf) CN Description 14,188 98 Paved parking, HSG C 23,042 96 Gravel surface, HSG C 3,703 79 <50% Grass cover, Poor, HSG B 40,933 95 Weighted Average 26,745 65.34% Pervious Area 14,188 34.66% Impervious Area Existing Conditions Existing Type 11 24 -hr 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81 " Prepared by BPA Printed 5/4/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paae 5 Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Reach 2R: N. Ditch E of Driveway Inflow Area = 0.505 ac, 52.20% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.49" for 2 -Year event Inflow = 0.83 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 0.063 of Outflow = 0.83 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 0.063 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Summary for Pond 1 P: N. Culvert Inflow Area = 0.242 ac, 0.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.30" for 2 -Year event Inflow = 0.05 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 0.006 of Outflow = 0.05 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 0.006 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary = 0.05 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 0.006 of Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 961.55'@ 12.12 hrs Device Routinq Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 961.45' 15.0" Round RCP Round 15" L= 41.0' RCP, end -section conforming to fill, Ke= 0.500 Inlet/ Outlet Invert= 961.45'/ 961.03' S=0.0102'/' Cc= 0.900 n=0.012 Concrete pipe, finished, Flow Area= 1.23 sf #2 Primary 962.20' 6.0' long x 6.0' breadth 962.2 Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 Coef. (English) 2.37 2.51 2.70 2.68 2.68 2.67 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.66 2.66 2.67 2.69 2.72 2.76 2.83 Primary OutFlow Max=0.05 cfs @ 12.12 hrs HW=961.55' TW=0.00' (Dynamic Tailwater) L1=RCPRound 15" (Barrel Controls 0.05 cfs @ 1.62 fps) 2=962.2- ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Summary for Pond 3P: To E. of Site Inflow Area = 0.940 ac, 34.66% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.26" for 2 -Year event Inflow = 2.61 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.177 of Primary = 2.61 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.177 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Existing Conditions Existing Type 1124 -hr 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" Prepared by BPA Printed 5/4/2017 HvdroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paae 6 Time span=1.00-72.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 7101 points Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN Reach routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method Subcatchment 1S: NW. Ditch Runoff Area=10,522 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=0.91" Tc=15.0 min CN=61 Runoff=0.25 cfs 0.018 of Subcatchment 2S: NW. Ex. Parking Runoff Area=11,491 sf 100.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.94" Tc=15.0 min CN=98 Runoff=1.18 cfs 0.087 of Subcatchment 3S: NE. Ex. Parking & Runoff Area=40,933 sf 34.66% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.61" Tc=15.0 min CN=95 Runoff=4.06 cfs 0.283 of Reach 2R: N. Ditch E of Driveway Inflow=1.42 cfs 0.105 of Outflow=1.42 cfs 0.105 of Pond 1P: N. Culvert Peak Elev=961.68' Inflow=0.25 cfs 0.018 of Outflow=0.25 cfs 0.018 of Pond 3P: To E. of Site Inflow=4.06 cfs 0.283 of Primary=4.06 cfs 0.283 of Total Runoff Area = 1.445 ac Runoff Volume = 0.388 of Average Runoff Depth = 3.22" 59.20% Pervious = 0.856 ac 40.80% Impervious = 0.590 ac Existing Conditions Existing Type 1124 -hr 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" Prepared by BPA Printed 5/4/2017 HvdroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pape 7 Summary for Subcatchment 1 S: NW. Ditch Runoff = 0.25 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.018 af, Depth= 0.91" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24 -hr 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" Area (sf) CN Description 10,522 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 10,522 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 2S: NW. Ex. Parking Runoff = 1.18 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.087 af, Depth= 3.94" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24 -hr 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" Area (sf) CN Description 11,491 98 Paved parking, HSG C 11,491 100.00% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 3S: NE. Ex. Parking & Building & Conc. Runoff = 4.06 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.283 af, Depth= 3.61" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24 -hr 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" Area (sf) CN Description 14,188 98 Paved parking, HSG C 23,042 96 Gravel surface, HSG C 3,703 79 <50% Grass cover, Poor, HSG B 40,933 95 Weighted Average 26,745 65.34% Pervious Area 14,188 34.66% Impervious Area Existing Conditions Existing Type 1124 -hr 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" Prepared by BPA Printed 5/4/2017 HvdroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paoe 8 Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Reach 2R: N. Ditch E of Driveway Inflow Area = 0.505 ac, 52.20% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.49" for 10 -Year event Inflow = 1.42 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 0.105 of Outflow = 1.42 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 0.105 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Summary for Pond 1 P: N. Culvert Inflow Area = 0.242 ac, 0.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.91" for 10 -Year event Inflow = 0.25 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.018 of Outflow = 0.25 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.018 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary = 0.25 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.018 of Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 961.68' @ 12.09 hrs Device Routinq Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 961.45' 15.0" Round RCP Round 15" L= 41.0' RCP, end -section conforming to fill, Ke= 0.500 Inlet/ Outlet Invert= 961.45'/ 961.03' S= 0.0102 T Cc= 0.900 n=0.012 Concrete pipe, finished, Flow Area= 1.23 sf #2 Primary 962.20' 6.0' long x 6.0' breadth 962.2 Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 Coef. (English) 2.37 2.51 2.70 2.68 2.68 2.67 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.66 2.66 2.67 2.69 2.72 2.76 2.83 Primary OutFlow Max=0.25 cfs @ 12.09 hrs HW=961.68' TW=0.00' (Dynamic Tailwater) 12=961=RCPRound 15" (Inlet Controls 0.25 cfs @ 1.62 fps) 2.2- ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Summary for Pond 3P: To E. of Site Inflow Area = 0.940 ac, 34.66% Impervious, Inflow Depth= 3.61" for 10 -Year event Inflow = 4.06 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.283 of Primary = 4.06 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.283 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Existing Conditions Existing Type 11 24 -hr 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Prepared by BPA Printed 5/4/2017 HvdroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pape 9 Time span=1.00-72.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 7101 points Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN Reach routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method Subcatchment 1S: NW. Ditch Runoff Area=10,522 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.65" Tc=15.0 min CN=61 Runoff=0.82 cfs 0.053 of Subcatchment 2S: NW. Ex. Parking Runoff Area=11,491 sf 100.00% Impervious Runoff Depth>6.69" Tc=15.0 min CN=98 Runoff=1.97 cfs 0.147 of Subcatchment 3S: NE. Ex. Parking & Runoff Area=40,933 sf 34.66% Impervious Runoff Depth=6.34" Tc=15.0 min CN=95 Runoff=6.91 cfs 0.496 of Reach 2R: N. Ditch E of Driveway Inflow=2.78 cfs 0.200 of Outflow=2.78 cfs 0.200 of Pond 1P: N. Culvert Peak Elev=961.88' Inflow=0.82 cfs 0.053 of Outflow=0.82 cfs 0.053 of Pond 3P: To E. of Site Inflow=6.91 cfs 0.496 of Primary=6.91 cfs 0.496 of Total Runoff Area = 1.445 ac Runoff Volume = 0.697 of Average Runoff Depth = 5.78" 59.20% Pervious = 0.856 ac 40.80% Impervious = 0.590 ac Existing Conditions Existing Type 1124 -hr 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Prepared by BPA Printed 5/4/2017 HvdroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paae 10 Summary for Subcatchment 1S: NW. Ditch Runoff = 0.82 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 0.053 af, Depth= 2.65" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24 -hr 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Area (sf) CN Description 10,522 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 10,522 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 2S: NW. Ex. Parking Runoff = 1.97 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.147 af, Depth> 6.69" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24 -hr 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Area (sf) CN Description 11,491 98 Paved parkinq, HSG C 11,491 100.00% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) Oft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 3S: NE. Ex. Parking & Building & Conc. Runoff = 6.91 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.496 af, Depth= 6.34" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24 -hr 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Area (sf) CN Description 14,188 98 Paved parking, HSG C 23,042 96 Gravel surface, HSG C 3,703 79 <50% Grass cover, Poor, HSG B 40,933 95 Weighted Average 26,745 65.34% Pervious Area 14,188 34.66% Impervious Area Existing Conditions Existing Type 1124 -hr 100- Year Rainfall=6.93" Prepared by BPA Printed 5/4/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paoe 11 Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Reach 2R: N. Ditch E of Driveway Inflow Area = 0.505 ac, 52.20% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 4.76" for 100 -Year event Inflow = 2.78 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 0.200 of Outflow = 2.78 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 0.200 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Summary for Pond 1 P: N. Culvert Inflow Area = 0.242 ac, 0.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth= 2.65" for 100 -Year event Inflow = 0.82 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 0.053 of Outflow = 0.82 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 0.053 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary = 0.82 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 0.053 of Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 961.88'@ 12.08 hrs Device Routinq Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 961.45' 15.0" Round RCP Round 15" L= 41.0' RCP, end -section conforming to fill, Ke= 0.500 Inlet/ Outlet Invert= 961.45'/961.03' S=0.0102'/' Cc= 0.900 n=0.012 Concrete pipe, finished, Flow Area= 1.23 sf #2 Primary 962.20' 6.0' long x 6.0' breadth 962.2 Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 Coef. (English) 2.37 2.51 2.70 2.68 2.68 2.67 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.66 2.66 2.67 2.69 2.72 2.76 2.83 Primary OutFlow Max=0.82 cfs @ 12.08 hrs HW=961.88' TW=0.00' (Dynamic Tailwater) L2=961=RCPRound 15" (Barrel Controls 0.82 cfs @ 3.30 fps) 2.i ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Summary for Pond 3P: To E. of Site Inflow Area = 0.940 ac, 34.66% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 6.34" for 100 -Year event Inflow = 6.91 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.496 of Primary = 6.91 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.496 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Ai - 2R N. Ditc of Driveway � S N. Culvert NW. Ditch CB 3P 2S CB to N. Ditch NW. Ex. Parking 3S NE. Ex. Parking & Building A4P 4S To E. of Site NE. Ex. Parking & Building & Conc. Subcat Reach Aon LinkI Routing Diagram for Proposed Prepared by BPA, Printed 5/4/2017 HydroCAD®10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Proposed Prepared by BPA HvdroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Area Listing (all nodes) Area CN Description (acres) (subcatchment-numbers) 0.092 79 <50% Grass cover, Poor, HSG B (3S, 4S) 0.242 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B (1S) 0.287 96 Gravel surface, HSG B (3S, 4S) 0.561 98 Paved parking, HSG B (3S, 4S) 0.264 98 Paved parking, HSG C (2S) 1.445 90 TOTAL AREA Proposed Conditions Printed 5/4/2017 Paae 2 Proposed Conditions Proposed Type 11 24 -hr 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81 " Prepared by BPA Printed 5/4/2017 HvdroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 @2016 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paae 3 Time span=1.00-72.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 7101 points Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN Reach routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method Subcatchment 1S: NW. Ditch Runoff Area=10,522 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=0.30" Tc=15.0 min CN=61 Runoff=0.05 cfs 0.006 of Subcatchment 2S: NW. Ex. Parking Runoff Area=11,491 sf 100.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.58" Tc=15.0 min CN=98 Runoff=0.79 cfs 0.057 of Subcatchment 3S: NE. Ex. Parking & Runoff Area=19,277 sf 83.80% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.26" Tc=15.0 min CN=95 Runoff=1.23 cfs 0.083 of Subcatchment 4S: NE. Ex. Parking & Runoff Area=21,657 sf 38.19% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.37" Tc=15.0 min CN=96 Runoff=1.42 cfs 0.098 of Reach 2R: N. Ditch E of Driveway Inflow=2.06 cfs 0.146 of Outflow=2.06 cfs 0.146 of Pond 1P: N. Culvert Peak Elev=961.55' Inflow=0.05 cfs 0.006 of Outflow=0.05 cfs 0.006 of Pond 3P: CB to N. Ditch Peak Elev=959.88' Inflow=1.23 cfs 0.083 of 12.0" Round Culvert n=0.012 L=10.0' S=0.0300 T Outflow=1.23 cfs 0.083 of Pond 4P: To E. of Site Inflow=1.42 cfs 0.098 of Primary=1.42 cfs 0.098 of Total Runoff Area = 1.445 ac Runoff Volume = 0.244 of Average Runoff Depth = 2.03" 42.94% Pervious = 0.621 ac 57.06% Impervious = 0.824 ac Proposed Conditions Proposed Type 11 24 -hr 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81 " Prepared by BPA Printed 5/4/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paae 4 Summary for Subcatchment 1S: NW. Ditch Runoff = 0.05 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 0.006 af, Depth= 0.30" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24 -hr 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81" Area (sf) CN Description 10,522 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 10,522 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 2S: NW. Ex. Parking Runoff = 0.79 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.057 af, Depth= 2.58" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24 -hr 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81" Area (sf) 11,491 11,491 Tc Length (min) (feet) 15.0 Runoff = CN Description 98 Paved parkinq, HSG C 100.00% Impervious Area Slope Velocity Capacity Description (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 3S: NE. Ex. Parking & Building 1.23 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.083 af, Depth= 2.26" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24 -hr 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81" Area (sf) CN Description 16,154 98 Paved parking, HSG B 395 96 Gravel surface, HSG B 2,728 79 <50% Grass cover, Poor, HSG B 19,277 95 Weighted Average 3,123 16.20% Pervious Area 16,154 83.80% Impervious Area Proposed Conditions Proposed Type 1124 -hr 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81 " Prepared by BPA Printed 5/4/2017 HvdroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paae 5 Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) Oft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 4S: NE. Ex. Parking & Building & Conc. Runoff = 1.42 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.098 af, Depth= 2.37" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24 -hr 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81" Area (sf) CN Description 8,270 98 Paved parking, HSG B 12,115 96 Gravel surface, HSG B 1,272 79 <50% Grass cover, Poor, HSG B 21,657 96 Weighted Average 13,387 61.81 % Pervious Area 8,270 38.19% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Reach 2R: N. Ditch E of Driveway Inflow Area = 0.948 ac, 66.95% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.85" for 2 -Year event Inflow = 2.06 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 0.146 of Outflow = 2.06 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 0.146 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Summary for Pond 1 P: N. Culvert Inflow Area = 0.242 ac, 0.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.30" for 2 -Year event Inflow = 0.05 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 0.006 of Outflow = 0.05 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 0.006 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary = 0.05 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 0.006 of Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 961.55' @ 12.12 hrs Device Routinq Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 961.45' 15.0" Round RCP _Round 15" L= 41.0' RCP, end -section conforming to fill, Ke= 0.500 Inlet/ Outlet Invert= 961.45'/ 961.03' S=0.0102'/' Cc= 0.900 n=0.012 Concrete pipe, finished, Flow Area= 1.23 sf #2 Primary 962.20' 6.0' long x 6.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 Proposed Conditions Proposed Type 11 24 -hr 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81 " Prepared by BPA Printed 5/4/2017 HvdroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paae 6 Coef. (English) 2.37 2.51 2.70 2.68 2.68 2.67 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.66 2.66 2.67 2.69 2.72 2.76 2.83 Primary OutFlow Max=0.05 cfs @ 12.12 hrs HW=961.55' TW=0.00' (Dynamic Tailwater) L1=RCP_Round 15" (Barrel Controls 0.05 cfs @ 1.62 fps) 2=13road-Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Summary for Pond 3P: CB to N. Ditch Inflow Area = 0.443 ac, 83.80% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.26" for 2 -Year event Inflow = 1.23 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.083 of Outflow = 1.23 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.083 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary = 1.23 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.083 of Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 959.88'@ 12.06 hrs Device Routinq Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 959.30' 12.0" Round RCP -Round 12" L= 10.0' RCP, end -section conforming to fill, Ke= 0.500 Inlet/ Outlet Invert= 959.30'/ 959.00' S=0.0300'/' Cc= 0.900 n=0.012 Concrete pipe, finished, Flow Area= 0.79 sf PrimaryOutFlow Max=1.23 cfs @ 12.06 hrs HW=959.88' TW=0.00' (Dynamic Tailwater) L1=RCP_Round 12" (Inlet Controls 1.23 cfs @ 2.60 fps) Summary for Pond 4P: To E. of Site Inflow Area = 0.497 ac, 38.19% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.37" for 2 -Year event Inflow = 1.42 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.098 of Primary = 1.42 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.098 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Proposed Conditions Proposed Type 1124 -hr 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" Prepared by BPA Printed 5/4/2017 HvdroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paae 7 Time span=1.00-72.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 7101 points Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN Reach routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method Subcatchment 1S: NW. Ditch Runoff Area=10.522 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=0.91" Tc=15.0 min CN=61 Runoff=0.25 cfs 0.018 of Subcatchment 2S: NW. Ex. Parking Runoff Area=11.491 sf 100.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.94" Tc=15.0 min CN=98 Runoff=1.18 cfs 0.087 of Subcatchment 3S: NE. Ex. Parking & Runoff Area=19.277 sf 83.80% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.61" Tc=15.0 min CN=95 Runoff=1.91 cfs 0.133 of Subcatchment 4S: NE. Ex. Parking & Runoff Area=21.657 sf 38.19% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.72" Tc=15.0 min CN=96 Runoff=2.18 cfs 0.154 of Reach 2R: N. Ditch E of Driveway Inflow=3.33 cfs 0.238 of Outflow=3.33 cfs 0.238 of Pond 1P: N. Culvert Peak Elev=961.68' Inflow=0.25 cfs 0.018 of Outflow=0.25 cfs 0.018 of Pond 3P: CB to N. Ditch Peak Elev=960.06' Inflow=1.91 cfs 0.133 of 12.0" Round Culvert n=0.012 L=10.0' S=0.0300'/' Outflow=1.91 cfs 0.133 of Pond 4P: To E. of Site Inflow=2.18 cfs 0.154 of Primary=2.18 cfs 0.154 of Total Runoff Area = 1.445 ac Runoff Volume = 0.392 of Average Runoff Depth = 3.26" 42.94% Pervious = 0.621 ac 57.06% Impervious = 0.824 ac Proposed Conditions Proposed Type 11 24 -hr 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" Prepared by BPA Printed 5/4/2017 HvdroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 8 Summary for Subcatchment 1S: NW. Ditch Runoff = 0.25 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.018 af, Depth= 0.91" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24 -hr 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" Area (sf) CN Description 10,522 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 10,522 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 2S: NW. Ex. Parking Runoff = 1.18 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.087 af, Depth= 3.94" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24 -hr 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" Area (sf) 11,491 11,491 Tc Length (min) (feet) 15.0 Runoff = CN Description 98 Paved parking, HSG C 100.00% Impervious Area Slope Velocity Capacity Description (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 3S: NE. Ex. Parking & Building 1.91 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.133 af, Depth= 3.61" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24 -hr 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" Area (sf) CN Description 16,154 98 Paved parking, HSG B 395 96 Gravel surface, HSG B 2,728 79 <50% Grass cover, Poor, HSG B 19,277 95 Weighted Average 3,123 16.20% Pervious Area 16,154 83.80% Impervious Area Proposed Conditions Proposed Type 1124 -hr 90 -Year Rainfall=4.98" Prepared by BPA Printed 5/4/2017 HvdroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paoe 9 Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 4S: NE. Ex. Parking & Building & Conc. Runoff = 2.18 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.154 af, Depth= 3.72" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24 -hr 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" Area (sf) CN Description 8,270 98 Paved parking, HSG B 12,115 96 Gravel surface, HSG B 1,272 79 <50% Grass cover, Poor, HSG B 21,657 96 Weighted Average 13,387 61.81 % Pervious Area 8,270 38.19% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Reach 2R: N. Ditch E of Driveway Inflow Area = 0.948 ac, 66.95% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 3.01" for 10 -Year event Inflow = 3.33 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 0.238 of Outflow = 3.33 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 0.238 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Summary for Pond 1 P: N. Culvert Inflow Area = 0.242 ac, 0.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.91" for 10 -Year event Inflow = 0.25 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.018 of Outflow = 0.25 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.018 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary = 0.25 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.018 of Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 961.68' @ 12.09 hrs Device Routinq Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 961.45' 15.0" Round RCP Round 15" L= 41.0' RCP, end -section conforming to fill, Ke= 0.500 Inlet/ Outlet Invert= 961.45'/961.03' S=0.0102'/' Cc= 0.900 n=0.012 Concrete pipe, finished, Flow Area= 1.23 sf #2 Primary 962.20' 6.0' long x 6.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 Proposed Conditions Proposed Type// 24 -hr 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" Prepared by BPA Printed 5/4/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paae 10 Coef. (English) 2.37 2.51 2.70 2.68 2.68 2.67 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.66 2.66 2.67 2.69 2.72 2.76 2.83 Primary OutFlow Max=0.25 cfs @ 12.09 hrs HW=961.68' TW=0.00' (Dynamic Tailwater) �1=RCP_Round 15" (Inlet Controls 0.25 cfs @ 1.62 fps) 2=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Summary for Pond 3P: CB to N. Ditch Inflow Area = 0.443 ac, 83.80% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 3.61" for 10 -Year event Inflow = 1.91 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.133 of Outflow = 1.91 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.133 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary = 1.91 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.133 of Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 960.06' @ 12.06 hrs Device Routinq Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 959.30' 12.0" Round RCP -Round 12" L= 10.0' RCP, end -section conforming to fill, Ke= 0.500 Inlet/ Outlet Invert= 959.30'/959.00' S=0.0300'/' Cc= 0.900 n=0.012 Concrete pipe, finished, Flow Area= 0.79 sf Primary OutFlow Max=1.91 cfs @ 12.06 hrs HW=960.06' TW=0.00' (Dynamic Tailwater) L1=RCP_Round 12" (Inlet Controls 1.91 cfs @ 2.97 fps) Summary for Pond 4P: To E. of Site Inflow Area = 0.497 ac, 38.19% Impervious, Inflow Depth= 3.72" for 10 -Year event Inflow = 2.18 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.154 of Primary = 2.18 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.154 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Proposed Conditions Proposed Type 1124 -hr 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Prepared by BPA Printed 5/4/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paae 11 Time span=1.00-72.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 7101 points Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN Reach routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method Subcatchment 1S: NW. Ditch Runoff Area=10.522 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.65" Tc=15.0 min CN=61 Runoff=0.82 cfs 0.053 of Subcatchment 2S: NW. Ex. Parking Runoff Area=11.491 sf 100.00% Impervious Runoff Depth>6.69" Tc=15.0 min CN=98 Runoff=1.97 cfs 0.147 of Subcatchment 3S: NE. Ex. Parking & Runoff Area=19.277 sf 83.80% Impervious Runoff Depth=6.34" Tc=15.0 min CN=95 Runoff=3.26 cfs 0.234 of Subcatchment 4S: NE. Ex. Parking & Runoff Area=21.657 sf 38.19% Impervious Runoff Depth=6.45" Tc=15.0 min CN=96 Runoff=3.68 cfs 0.267 of Reach 2R: N. Ditch E of Driveway Inflow=6.03 cfs 0.434 of Outflow=6.03 cfs 0.434 of Pond 1P: N. Culvert Peak Elev=961.88' Inflow=0.82 cfs 0.053 of Outflow=0.82 cfs 0.053 of Pond 313: CB to N. Ditch Peak Elev=960.54' Inflow=3.26 cfs 0.234 of 12.0" Round Culvert n=0.012 L=10.0' S=0.0300'/' Outflow=3.26 cfs 0.234 of Pond 4P: To E. of Site Inflow=3.68 cfs 0.267 of Primary=3.68 cfs 0.267 of Total Runoff Area = 1.445 ac Runoff Volume = 0.701 of Average Runoff Depth = 5.83" 42.94% Pervious = 0.621 ac 57.06% Impervious = 0.824 ac Proposed Conditions Proposed Type 1124 -hr 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Prepared by BPA Printed 5/4/2017 HvdroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paoe 12 Summary for Subcatchment 1 S: NW. Ditch Runoff = 0.82 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 0.053 af, Depth= 2.65" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24 -hr 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Area (sf) CN Description 10,522 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 10,522 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 2S: NW. Ex. Parking Runoff = 1.97 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.147 af, Depth> 6.69" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24 -hr 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Area (sf) 11,491 11,491 Tc Length (min) (feet) 15.0 Runoff = CN Description 98 Paved parkinq, HSG C 100.00% Impervious Area Slope Velocity Capacity Description (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 3S: NE. Ex. Parking & Building 3.26 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.234 af, Depth= 6.34" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24 -hr 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Area (sf) CN Description 16,154 98 Paved parking, HSG B 395 96 Gravel surface, HSG B 2,728 79 <50% Grass cover, Poor, HSG B 19,277 95 Weighted Average 3,123 16.20% Pervious Area 16,154 83.80% Impervious Area Proposed Conditions Proposed Type 1124 -hr 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Prepared by BPA Printed 5/4/2017 HydroCADO 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paae 13 Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 4S: NE. Ex. Parking & Building & Conc. Runoff = 3.68 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.267 af, Depth= 6.45" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24 -hr 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Area (sf) CN Description 8,270 98 Paved parking, HSG B 12,115 96 Gravel surface, HSG B 1,272 79 <50% Grass cover, Poor, HSG B 21,657 96 Weighted Average 13,387 61.81 % Pervious Area 8,270 38.19% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Reach 2R: N. Ditch E of Driveway Inflow Area = 0.948 ac, 66.95% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 5.50" for 100 -Year event Inflow = 6.03 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.434 of Outflow = 6.03 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.434 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Summary for Pond 1 P: N. Culvert Inflow Area = 0.242 ac, 0.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.65" for 100 -Year event Inflow = 0.82 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 0.053 of Outflow = 0.82 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 0.053 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary = 0.82 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 0.053 of Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 961.88'@ 12.08 hrs Device Routinq Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 961.45' 15.0" Round RCP Round 15" L= 41.0' RCP, end -section conforming to fill, Ke= 0.500 Inlet/ Outlet Invert= 961.45'/ 961.03' S=0.0102'/' Cc= 0.900 n=0.012 Concrete pipe, finished, Flow Area= 1.23 sf #2 Primary 962.20' 6.0' long x 6.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 Proposed Conditions Proposed Type// 24 -hr 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Prepared by BPA Printed 5/4/2017 HvdroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paae 14 Coef. (English) 2.37 2.51 2.70 2.68 2.68 2.67 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.66 2.66 2.67 2.69 2.72 2.76 2.83 Primary OutFlow Max=0.82 cfs @ 12.08 hrs HW=961.88' TW=0.00' (Dynamic Tailwater) L1=RCP_Round 15" (Barrel Controls 0.82 cfs @ 3.30 fps) 2=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Summary for Pond 3P: CB to N. Ditch Inflow Area = 0.443 ac, 83.80% Impervious, Inflow Depth= 6.34" for 100 -Year event Inflow = 3.26 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.234 of Outflow = 3.26 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.234 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary = 3.26 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.234 of Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 960.54'@ 12.06 hrs Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 959.30' 12.0" Round RCP -Round 12" L= 10.0' RCP, end -section conforming to fill, Ke= 0.500 Inlet/ Outlet Invert= 959.30'/959.00' S=0.0300'/' Cc= 0.900 n=0.012 Concrete pipe, finished, Flow Area= 0.79 sf PrimaryOutFlow Max=3.25 cfs @ 12.06 hrs HW=960.54' TW=0.00' (Dynamic Tai [water) L1=RCP_Round 12" (Inlet Controls 3.25 cfs @ 4.14 fps) Summary for Pond 4P: To E. of Site Inflow Area = 0.497 ac, 38.19% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 6.45" for 100 -Year event Inflow = 3.68 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.267 of Primary = 3.68 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.267 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs z O a 0 Z a a Q Z /W V W J CL 1: M 0 0 to CO N N w cu N Q N In m d a� 0)m � � N ai -o 3 c m a c6 N O 'O mN y E co N c a, E CL U O p) m E O c ^ m N O' (n E N t°o N° N 3 m c a ami y co Q m o ) p) s 2 O E O U w ca c L7 mm 0 c Q) c_cu — a w m 3 m 'en, Q U ~O .°cam' N C n cn m co O_ N W d Q m o 3 U T - 0) aa)i c ca o .c a°) c'� ° c �o m ° o E Tm ° N O d N 2 L "O Q N m E 75 O O @ a N a) c, E N O_ E N m d' .O N O O O N O_'O w -O 'O N O L '` N N may m 0 U U) N � Q O > f6 w (D co Z E -0(1) c O fl_ a) to co N p N 0 - N « T... m m •? � d (9 p) O)m m m0 N m tD) E •� T7 N c �. d> T 0 a) L m m 7 ' N "6 N Q) (6 -O Q. >' O U) ... 3 a 7 7 Q CO ' 7 (6 O m a N N E tq 0 0— m N U O (Oo Q p) a) 2 Q 0 O. O N m L O O O O- N U c 'dN to N m (top `U)=p .O c i p_ N N a) 7 O_ O (n O 'p 3 E 'p w N O m t F r d E p >> N p U> U m O to � U 2 O_ a Q m � "' H O (n CO to for m p O N L p m t H U N T N J U) O ZU) m co .>- = m U) � a _d co m y > N °O U CL co C ti U ca m L L m c m rn O m O >, c m S m m 'o O tp Q Co L O O O. U) to J N N .d.. m a O p m O L 0- Z d N N N O m m CL O U) cn N > a) L O d O_ N L 'ca cn j to O Rv. 7 J Q � � L i dCL ` y N L �y W m F- i o 0 m 0 N L o a a U) m n. y Q > a 3 ) d «. t.. .. q d y0 m 0 m n. pa > a a > m a °o d cn n 3 o m `o o o d _ S m m O _a 0 O W o n d a Q m m m m d LL O T o w "O r O U)> d > U "O 3 N > > m N d U d C d d m Q cn to to o m m U U (9 (D J 2 M 2 a K fn to U) an to to d c G. a) � O U x 0 °'r t X d a � L to 1 y O C m � d � 3 N f6 O Z U �I Soil Map—Wright County, Minnesota Map Unot Legend Wright County, Minnesota (MN171) Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI I 260 Duelm loamy sand, 0 to 2 4.2 0.6% percent slopes 11 406 Dorset sandy loam, 0 to 2 571.7 76.3% percent slopes 441 Almora loam, 0 to 2 percent 10.2 1.4% slopes 1015 Udipsamments (cut and fill 8.2 1.1% land) 1087B Angus-Malardi complex, 2 to 6 0.0 0.0% percent slopes 1288 Seelyeville and Markey soils, 19.6 2.601 ponded, 0 to 1 percent slopes 13628 Angus loam, 2 to 6 percent 2.1 0.3% slopes 1368 Southhaven loam, 0 to 2 5.2 0.7% percent slopes 1377B Dorset -Two Inlets complex, 2 72.1 9.6% to 6 percent slopes 1377C Dorset -Two Inlets complex, 6 33.9 4.5% to 12 percent slopes 1377D Dorset -Two Inlets complex, 12 2.2 0.3% to 20 percent slopes 1377E Dorset -Two Inlets complex, 20 20.1 2.7% to 35 percent slopes Totals for Area of Interest 749.6 100.0%o USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/1/2017 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3 Map Unit Description: Dorset sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes ---Wright County, Minnesota Wright County, Minnesota 406—Dorset sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 2wOm2 Elevation: 660 to 1,710 feet Mean annual precipitation: 25 to 33 inches Mean annual air temperature: 37 to 48 degrees F Frost -free period: 120 to 170 days Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance Map Unit Composition Dorset and similar soils: 80 percent Minor components: 20 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Dorset Setting Landform: Flats Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf Down-slope shape: Linear Across -slope shape: Linear Parent material: Loamy glaciofluvial deposits over sandy and gravelly outwash Typical profile Ap - 0 to 11 inches: sandy loam Bt - 11 to 20 inches: sandy loam 2Bk - 20 to 38 inches: gravelly coarse sand 2C - 38 to 79 inches: gravelly coarse sand Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 2 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Somewhat excessively drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.60 to 2.00 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Calcium carbonate, maximum in profile: 15 percent Salinity, maximum in profile: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos/cm) Available water storage in profile: Low (about 5.0 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 3s Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3s Hydrologic Soil Group: B USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/1/2017 �� Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 2 Map Unit Description: Dorset sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes ---Wright County, Minnesota Other vegetative classification: Sloping Upland, Neutral (G091AN002MN) Hydric soil rating: No Minor Components Corliss Percent of map unit: 10 percent Landform: Flats Landform position (three-dimensional): Rise Down-slope shape: Linear Across -slope shape: Linear Other vegetative classification: Sandy (G091AN022MN) Hydric soil rating: No Oylen Percent of map unit: 5 percent Landform: Flats Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf Down-slope shape: Linear Across -slope shape: Linear Other vegetative classification: Sloping Upland, Neutral (G091 AN002MN) Hydric soil rating: No Forada Percent of map unit: 3 percent Landform: Swales Down-slope shape: Concave Across -slope shape: Linear Other vegetative classification: (G091AN003MN) Hydric soil rating: Yes Forada, occasionally ponded Percent of map unit: 2 percent Landform: Depressions Down-slope shape: Concave Across -slope shape: Concave Other vegetative classification: (G091 AN003MN) Hydric soil rating: Yes Data Source Information Level Swale, Low AWC, Neutral Level Swale, Low AWC, Neutral Soil Survey Area: Wright County, Minnesota Survey Area Data: Version 10, Sep 19, 2016 USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/1/2017 �� Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 2 X z o_ 20 0 20 U O SCALE IN FEET SCALE: I" = 20' E LEGEND. otes electrical cabinet 5 - Denotes Denotes electric service Denotes sanitary service Denotes sanitary manhole �z Denotes watervolve--------- --(T- Denotes sign ut N a `r Denotes power pole .0 ' a Denotes guy wire j o .. Denotes telephone pedestal Denotes electric meter i= Denotes cable television box zZ i Denotes fiber optic service box k3 S2 3 w Denotes underground gas o 0 o v o M Denotes mailbox ' Denotes soll boring Denotes well Eo L N Denotes air conditioning o_ 8 s u0i Denotesas meter i3 d g z Denotes Flared;Etwkored End Section - g - - Denotes culvert ti Denotes Wetland m ° ° az e 3 Denotes Tree, Coniferous -5&.2u, En Denotes Tree, Deciduous rQo$m v v> o a Denotes bituminous surface :� - T P EN tS in o Denotes concrete surface I ( Denotes grovel surface 0 Z crDenotes wood fence $� Wj ------- Denotes chainlink fence W -- - Denotes barbwire fence Q I" �^ Denotes stone wall Q 4 - -- - - _ Denotes underground Telephone m Denotes overhead electric 0 - Denotes underground fiber optics --- _ -. Denotes underground electric Q. Denotes underground gas line 0 o u o J .. Denotes tree linem zsaM -0 +!l 5� -------- Denotes easement Denotes right of way Denotes major contour -- -- - _ Denotes minor contour -- -- - Denotes sanitary sewer -- - - Denotes storm sewer - Denotes waterline — — — — Denotes existing adjoiners Denotes wetland - -- - Denotes open wafer Z X 948.0 Proposed ground elevation f- Q t= Proposed Drainage Flow Z Q e e d Proposed Silt Fence 0 J LLJ ---8pp-- Proposed Major Contour U5CDX00— Proposed Minor Contour Q 0:J Z Q Proposed Erosion Control Blanket W z :2 Q C-- Proposed Bituminous Surface (n O Proposed Rip Rap Q w CD Z LLJ U Z J H H LLJ Z (n 2 0 x M C0 W SHEET N0. 2 a I I - — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — �� H \ 20 0 20 Z O SCALE IN FEET SCALE: I" = 20' o / / Grading & Erosion Control Notes 1. Contractor shall confine construction operations to the construction limits shown. — — — — — — — — — — -- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2. All work shall conform to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's Storm Water Permit requirements. Contractor shall obtain NPDES permit and comply with all _-4 Permit requirements. o \ J 3. i Contractor my r shall Inspect the emir site least rrewithin ld hours of my rainstarm. Damaged silt fence oother son co t oId devl a z or practices shall be repaired immediately. Inspection and maintenance of evicesa" `\ shall continueuntil the site has undergone final stabilization and a Termination Is submitted to the MPCA. I` I o 00 � N f \\� �"` `` 4. All grading operations shall be conducted in a manner to minimize the P" potential for site erosion. W) o /''• i / / / - A I ` A - 5. The site sol erosion and sediment control facilities shall be installed and m maintained to conform with the standards specified by the (MPCA). .Pi 0 l / / I L / ' Z z x r, z 096L912 _.,9961.446 _ X63',071.,_6. Silt fences shall be installed prior the disturbance of any areas and maintained a 13 s 3 a until all tributary disturbed areas are restored. 0 0 0 0 0 r. 7. All soils tracked onto pavement or my other off-site areas shall be removed f - co daily. FES 10 -LF 12 CP O 3.00S - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 8. The site sediment control facilities for the project must be Installed o /01 {'� '"� - - -- - �- --y ,.-.�-`� Por to y t grading ope ration. ContacttheSol and Water - so Conservation District (SWCD once sold facilities are Installed and before any 2E'5�c z •, __r--�-"'----.,..-..ar--,•,. - .•.-.--------- -- - -- . �..•-.'+,.,.-mss..:,_ � _ , _. grading cm take place. - � ��' I _- _ Nva M 1�. _ _.. - _ �a�a 0 d i I -,� R E A 1 I I e _6 -E' �• v1��. - -_. - 9• The Contractor shall be responsible for the removal of all erosion control «� ° w m z �' ;I _ _ p - • - I % 5T OB r measures, including silt fence and bales, upon establishment of permanent "6o_oo mil N 62-M 3o vegetation in said areas. «a-� g653' 10. All ditches and areas disturbed during construction shall be restored and vegetatedo j9$ i �= • I I e0 as soon as possible. Any finished areas shall be seeded and mulched within a; •~ 14 days after finished grading is completed accordance to Mn/Dot 2575. rr'tt ` A m89�= c II. Construction sediment shall be removed from ponds prior to final stabilization. rn {: n 12. All disturbed areas shall be revegetated with seed mix, mulched, fertilized ('& disk anchored. �j 13. Backyard drainage swales shall be graded at a minimum 1% slope. Z ti 14. Inlet protection devices shall be placed in all storm drainage structures Q Z ' until vegetation is established on slopes. (A =m 15. Riprap Is to extend to the bottom of the pond. All riprop shall be granite. 1X 16. All existing wells not used for Irrigation purposes shall be abandoned. W CO UJ lj ge, # , i G I PRanx-'sLT srOP• FABRICF, 2•XL•z4' Waaa—f 11- O Z,as � STAKES O 4 O.C. Id MNYU.1 Ci H j 4c Z I awstacaRaENo as rABwc j PROPOSED [: y EMBA KMw AV A3: SLT FENCE -II I, ' � M1f• ran.e Roe banvmo I Q Q ,j i TEMPORARY WASHED ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE (NTS) 4FFOINr SCHEDUIFF U5�- --, - Seed mix 25-121: 61 Ib/ac. W Q Fertilizer 22-5-10: 350 Ib/ac. Z Mulch Type 1: 2 T/ac. G W Z W k: LEGEND: f U C� j X 948.0 Proposed ground elevation U O Proposed Drainage Flow o Q W � Proposed Silt Fence Z LLj U O -A , _ Do-- Proposed Major Contour � J � CL —8p0-- Proposed Minor Contour _ W Z i _ 0 Z Proposed Erosion Control Blanket m U SHEET NO. Proposed BitinuSurface I f Proposed Rip Rop City Council Agenda: 06/26/17 4D. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2017- 27 accepting grant and committing to local matching funds for the 2017 MnDOT Stand -Alone Noise Barrier Program (SB) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: As discussed at the May 8, 2017 City Council workshop, the City has been selected for funding through the 2017 Greater MN Noise Barrier Program. The Council adopted a resolution on October 10, 2016 supporting the City's application for a noise barrier along I-94 in the Balboul neighborhood located south of Prairie Road between Hedman Lane, Balboul Circle and Marvin Elwood Road. The program requires the City to fund 10% of the project construction cost. MnDOT is estimating the City's share at $110,000, with MnDOT's share at $990,000. MnDOT needs to know by July 1, 2017 if the City will adopt resolution accepting the grant and commit to the 10% share, so they can allocate funds for the project and start the design process. Construction could start in the winter of 2018 with tree removal, if needed, and then the actual construction of the wall would occur in the spring and summer of 2019. The City's share of the cost would be due in 2018 after the project is bid. MnDOT will present the City with a cooperative construction agreement similar to other MnDOT projects completed in the City where there was a City cost share. A neighborhood meeting was held on June 7, 2017 with the resident's in the area and with City and MnDOT staff in attendance. Approximately 15 residents attended out of 61 properties notified between Prairie Road and I-94 in the Balboul neighborhood. All resident's present were supportive of the noise wall. As discussed at the May 8, 2017 Council workshop, the Council still needs to decide whether to pursue special assessments or not for the City's share of the project cost. At the neighborhood meeting, residents were made aware that the Council is still considering funding options for the project, which may include special assessments to the benefiting property owners. A few residents spoke out that they are not in favor of being assessed. There are not many examples of other communities assessing for noise barriers since most are constructed and paid for 100% by MnDOT with a highway expansion project. The Greater MN Noise Barrier Program is in its second year, with the City of Avon being awarded the grant in the first year. The City of Avon started to pursue assessments, until a local property owner/developer offered to fund the 10 % share, therefore assessments were not levied. In the metro, the City of Edina is the only city that has requested (via residents petitioning for the project) and been awarded grants for noise walls and also assessed the 10% city share. Their assessments were based on a tiered approach depending on proximity of property to noise wall. The assessment rates ranged from $1,000 to $3,000 per property. Initial discussions with the City attorney and two City Council Agenda: 06/26/17 appraisers indicated that a special assessments can be justified for benefitting properties. There are 61 properties in the neighborhood, some or all could benefit from the project. A special benefit analysis would determine the assessment amount. If the Council would like to proceed with assessing the benefitting properties, a special benefit analysis by a certified general appraiser could be obtained to determine comparable changes in property values where noise walls have been constructed. The appraisal fee is estimated to be $5,000. In lieu of this, staff could research other methods to calculate the assessments, such as researching comparable property value increases using County parcel data and speaking with County auditor's where these noise walls have been constructed recently. The City of Edina used this method and did not obtain a benefit appraisal, given they had similar property value comparables within their city. If the Council decides to pursue special assessments, the Council will need to follow the Chapter 429 process for special assessments and authorize a feasibility study, hold a public hearing in 2017 or 2018 and then conduct the assessment hearing in 2019 after the wall is constructed. This process will add to the City's cost for the project. It is recommended that before a feasibility report is authorized, a special benefit analysis is authorized. Al. Budget impact: The proposed noise barrier would be approximately 1,700 feet long which would cost approximately $1,100,000 based on MnDOT's construction cost estimate. The City's share of the construction cost is estimated at $110,000 to be paid to MnDOT in 2018 after the project is bid. If the Council decides to pursue special assessments, it is estimated that the cost to complete a special benefit analysis, complete a feasibility report, hold public and assessment hearings, would add approximately $10,000 to the City's costs. An appropriation will need to be made in 2018 from property tax revenue or existing reserves to fund the City's share of the cost. A2. Staff Workload Impact: MnDOT will complete the design, construction management and maintenance of the noise barrier. City staff and consultant time will be required to coordinate with MnDOT and additional time if special assessments are pursued. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to adopt Resolution 2017-27 accepting grant and committing to local matching funds for the 2017 MnDOT Stand -Alone Noise Barrier Program and not pursuing special assessments. City Council Agenda: 06/26/17 2. Motion to adopt Resolution 2017-27 accepting grant and committing to local matching funds for the 2017 MnDOT Stand -Alone Noise Barrier Program and authorize a special benefit analysis be completed at a cost not -to -exceed $5,000. 3. Motion to deny adoption of Resolution 2017-27 at this time. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approving Alternative #1 or #2. If Alternate #2 is selected, it is recommended to have the special benefit analysis completed and staff will report the results to council to then decide if a feasibility report should be authorized. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Resolution 2017-27 B. Project Location Map C. 6/7/17 Neighborhood Meeting comments D. MnDOT noise barrier handout RESOLUTION 2017-27 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING GRANT AND COMMITTING TO LOCAL MATCHING FUNDS FOR THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION GREATER MN STAND-ALONE NOISE BARRIER PROGRAM WHEREAS, the Greater MN Stand -Alone Noise barrier program was recommended by the Office of the Legislative Auditor for its ability to create a pathway for communities outside of the metropolitan area to become eligible for state -funded noise barrier projects; and WHEREAS, the City of Monticello supports the important public need to keep certain lands impacted by traffic noise quiet and preserved; and WHEREAS, the City of Monticello submitted application for the MnDOT Greater MN Stand -Alone Noise Barrier Program; and WHEREAS, the City of Monticello has been awarded grant funds for the program; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that, City of Monticello hereby accepts the grant award commits to the required local financial match of 10% of the project cost for the MnDOT Greater MN Stand -Alone Noise Barrier Program. ADOPTED BY the Monticello City Council this 26th day of June, 2017. CITY OF MONTICELLO Brian Stumpf, Mayor ATTEST: Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of a resolution duly passed, adopted and approved by the Monticello City Council at their scheduled meeting on June 26, 2017, and recorded in minutes of said meeting. Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator Notary Public: Date: (STAMP) OA Proposed Noise Barrier May 24, 2017 7W ! n; 4i p_° • �, ,4 .r ( � r f F fir.. � • .ti:.'Rl�! � �, ; tiP ! t f` IN Ic •MftY`Ir FEki Uft 'FRR1 rr of Monticello 1 inch = 500 feet Map Powered by Datal-ink from WSB & Associates June 7, 2017 NOISE BARRIER NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING COMMENT CARD SUMMARY House Last Name First Name Street Comments Number A sound reducing wall would be beneficial because we would finally be able to utilize and Stegman Elizabeth 132 Marvin Elwood Rd enjoy being in the backyard with our family and animals. It would be wonderful to be able to enjoy our Giroux Shirley 132 Marvin Elwood Rd backyard. Build the wall! We cannot enjoy our backyard because of the noise 24 hrs a day. Find the matching funds and do it without further Giroux Tom 132 Marvin Elwood Rd burden on the residents. Happy residents will help the city grow, unhappy residents will leave the city! Van Meveren James 139 Hedman Ln A great direction Gookin Mark 130 Marvin Elwood Rd We want the wall built. We hope the wall gets built. Even though we are 1/2 mile from 94 we still get loud noise Stachowicz John 1413 Hilltop Dr from the interstate. Sometimes we can't even have the windows open in the house at night. Nyberg Janice 134 Marvin Elwood Rd Yes, we want the wall! I would like the wall but do not want my taxes Wilkes Jacquelyn 127 Hedman Ln to increase. The project is sorely needed and we would Johnson James & Carol 128 Marvin Elwood Rd definitely support it. Metcalf Larry 112 Hedman Ln Build the wall please Myers Sharon 108 Marvin Elwood Rd Yes, that would be good. Yes, please put up the noise barrier so we can Erickson Michelle 106 Hedman Ln enjoy our backyard. Yes, we want the wall. We want to enjoy Skillings Colleen 105 Hedman Ln outside. We are in favor of accepting the grant through the Greater MN Noise Barrier Program. Robertson Dennis & Amy 124 Marvin Elwood Rd Especially as this will not affect our property taxes and add any special assessments. Grimm Jeff 106 Marvin Elwood Rd 106 Marvin Elwood Rd supports the proposed barrier wall. It could go for a bit more on the West end to protect more homes. On the east side the open space of the frisbee golf allows noise to funnel and if going to Otter Creek or over it to the edge of the golf course is feasible that would help. COMPARISON OF NOISE LEVELS Measured in dB(A) B-747-200 Takeoff* �! Food blender 4 •• • at 3 feet Noisy urban daytime Normal speech at 3 feet Dishwasher in next room Quiet urban nightime Quiet rural nightime Threshold of human hearing * As measured along the takeoff path 2 miles from the overflight end of the runway Why is a noise barrier being proposed? Currently traffic noise along 1-94 in Monticello exceeds the state's noise standards. MnDOT has recently developed a program to address noise concerns for existing neighborhoods in greater Minnesota. The City of Monticello applied for funding through this program for your neighborhood. Analysis shows that a noise barrier would reduce noise in your area by at least 5 decibels, which is why the noise barrier has been proposed. Why does MnDOT conduct noise studies? MnDOT conducts noise studies to assess existing noise levels and predict future noise levels to determine noise impacts. All traffic noise studies and analyses must adhere to the requirements established by federal law, Federal Highway Administration Noise Abatement Criteria, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Noise Standards, and MnDOT noise analysis guidelines. How does MnDOT determine whether a noise barrier is needed? A noise barrier must be both feasible and reasonable if it is to be constructed with the highway project. Feasibility and reasonableness are determined by quantifiable criteria such as cost, amount of noise reduction, safety, and site considerations. Noise mitigation is not automatically provided where noise impacts have been identified. Decisions on noise mitigation locations are made on a case-by-case basis. When would the noise barrier be built? The noise barrier would be built as soon as 2019. Frequently -Asked Questions -Am How do noise barriers work? Noise barriers block the direct path of sound waves from the highway to adjacent homes and businesses. However, they will not eliminate all noise - they only reduce the noise by `diffracting' the sound waves from the noise source to the noise receptor. In order to be considered effective, a noise barrier must reduce noise impact to receptors by at least 5 decibels. Noise Source Diffracted Sound Homes, A apartments, schools, businesses, etc. Noise Barrier Noise -Sensitive Receptor Can noise increase as it passes over the barrier? No. Noise does not increase as it passes over the barrier. The further noise travels, the greater the noise reduction. Could trees block the noise instead of a barrier? MnDOT would need to have a width of 100 feet of dense evergreen trees to effectively block traffic noise. There is not enough right-of-way space available to do this in this area. What impacts do noise barriers have on property values? There have not been any studies that link property values to noise barriers. Future buyers may either appreciate the noise reduction the barrier provides, or they may have aesthetic concerns about its presence. CITY OF MontiCeflo COUNCIL CONNECTION JUNE 26, 2017 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ArtPlace Grant The City was informed by ArtPlace applicant Sue Seeger that the 2017 Creative Placemaking grant application for Monticello was not selected among the 70 projects for further funding consideration. More information on the 70 funded projects can be found here: http://www.artplaceamerica.orL/view/pdf?f=/sites/default/files/public/pictures/ncpf 20 17finalists.ydf Although this year's ArtPlace grant was not selected, staff will continue to work with Ms. Seeger on ideas for strengthening a future application to ArtPlace, as well as other grant source opportunities. In addition, staff will be presenting capital improvement items related to some of the concepts discussed for enhancing walkability and interest in the downtown through art as part of this year's CIP project. Improvements — TH25 & CSAH 75 Sue Seeger continues to make progress on the swan sculpture to be located on the EDA's property at the SE corner of TH 25 and CSAH 75. In addition, Public Works will be painting the west side of the former BL Bikes building this summer. Landscaping improvements will be made once the sculpture is in place. To see more on the sculpture's progress: httDs://www.voutube.com/watch?v=dSiEbl2ciiRO httDs://www.voutube.com/watch?v=6tTNMrrmV9rE State Demographer and Housing Report Update The Minnesota State Demographer's Office has provided updated projections for 2016, attached. The EDA has also reviewed and accepted a Housing Study for Monticello, which Council Connection — 6/26/17 provides additional information on the current state of residential and outlining demand in specific residential sectors. Link to report: http://www.ci.monticello.mn.us/vertical/sites/%7B46185197-6086-4078-ADDC- OF3918715C4C%7D/uyloads/Item 5. Consideration of Housing Study.9pt v3.pdf Planning Commission will review the report and hear a presentation on the report in August. Community Sign Update Staff prepared and released a request for quotes for improvements to the community sign at TH 25 and CSAH 75 and the Hi -Way Liquors sign. Unfortunately, only one formal quote for the liquor store sign was submitted by the deadline. Given the potential cost of the sign improvements, staff is extending the deadline in order to obtain additional quotes. DATE: June 1, 2017 TO: Jeff O'Neill, Admin City of Monticello FROM: Susan Brower Minnesota State Demographer SUBJECT: 2016 Population and Household Estimates Your April 1, 2016 population estimate is 13,409. Your April 1, 2016 household estimate is 4,911. If you have any questions or comments about these estimates, please contact the State Demographic Center, 300 Centennial Office Building, 658 Cedar Street, St. Paul, MN 55155, phone (651) 201-2473 or send an e-mail to local. estimates (a,state.mn.us. All challenges must be submitted in writing. Please refer to the enclosed sheet for details HOW TO CHALLENGE THE POPULATION AND HOUSEHOLD ESTIMATES FROM THE STATE DEMOGRAPHER The legal responsibilities of the State Demographer with respect to local population estimates dictate that we be able to defend any revisions to the estimates. Consequently, we need documentation for our files. Cited below are types of information we will accept with a challenge to our estimates. You may select whichever approach is most appropriate for your situation. However, the more information you can provide the better. No challenv-es will be accepted after. June 24. 1. You may send us the number of active residential utility accounts in April 2010 and April 2016. We would prefer electrical accounts, but water and sewer accounts are acceptable. Please summarize your data. We don't need a list of all utility customers. Summary data for intervening years are helpful. Utility data are much more useful when provided together with building permit data (see #2 below). 2. Another approach is to provide the number of housing units added and lost by calendar year for the years beginning with 2010. Building and demolition permits are a good source of such information. Be sure to include mobile homes and apartments, and indicate whether any of the apartments were for the elderly. Please try to be as specific as possible about the type of unit involved (single-family, apartment, mobile home, etc.). 3. An actual count of persons or households maybe accepted, but places with more than 100 people must contact the State Demographer before proceeding with a count. The count you submit should be for 2017. We will interpolate a number for 2016. You must provide the following information: a. List the house number and street name of each housing unit in your city or township. If there is more than one unit at an address, please list each unit and provide an apartment number. b. Indicate whether the unit is occupied or vacant. If the unit is occupied, indicate the number of residents. Only year-round residents should be counted. Young people away at college or in the military, elderly persons who have moved to a nursing home in another town and seasonal (summer) residents should not be counted. c. Group qi grters such as nursing homes, dormitories, jails and grout homes should not be counted as housing units. Give us the name and address of the facility and the number of residents. d. After you have listed each housing unit, you must summarize your data and give us the total number of residents, the total number of vacant units and the total number of occupied units. e. Please indicate when the count was completed. Any additional information you can provide about your community will be appreciated. Changes in vacancy rates, the conversion of summer homes to year-round use, and changes imemployment opportunities are the types of things we like to hear about when we are evaluating an estimate. One final request --when you write to us, please provide your mailing address and a telephone number or e-mail address where you can be reached during the day. Thank you. State Demographic Center 300 Centennial Office Building 658 Cedar Street St. Paul, MN 55155 Telephone: 651-201-2473 TTY: 651-297-4357 Dear Clerk: June 1, 2017 MINNESOTA STATE DEMOGRAPHIC CENTER DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION Jeff O'Neill, Admin City of Monticello 505 Walnut St Ste 1 Monticello, MN 55362-8822 The State Demographer is required by law to produce annual population and household estimates for each of Minnesota's cities and townships. Enclosed you will find a sheet containing the April 1, 2016, population and household estimates for your jurisdiction. These estimates are being sent to you now for review and comment. It's important that our estimates are accurate, as they are used to distribute state aid to cities and townships. If you have questions about how our estimates impact a specific program, please contact the state agency responsible for that program. The enclosed figures represent estimated population and household changes since the 2010 Census. The number of households corresponds to the number of occupied housing units. A household may be a single family, one person living alone, or any group of people who share the same living area. While we believe that our estimates are usually accurate, we realize there may be occasional problems. For this reason, we value your comments. We may not be aware of such changes as housing demolitions, the gain or loss of group quarters (like college dormitories, nursing homes, etc.), construction of public housing and the gain or loss of mobile homes. Please note that our estimates: • pertain to one year ago, not the present; • have also been sent to your county auditor for review; • are subject to change and are not considered final until they are released to the Minnesota Department of Revenue in July. If you are satisried with our estimates, it is not necessary to contact us or provide any further information.. If you wish to challenge our estimates, please send us the appropriate data described in the enclosed challenge guide by June 24, 2017. Questions or comments should be directed to James Hibbs at the address listed on the letterhead. You may also contact us by e-mail at local. estimates a,state.mn.us or by phone at (651) 201-2473. The volume of phone calls is heavy at this time of year, so you may be asked to leave a message on our voice mail system. We will respond promptly. Please remember that we cannot correct problems with the 2010. Census. Thank you for taking time to review these estimates. Sincerely, tui Susan Brower State Demographer Enclosures CITY OF Montido COUNCIL CONNECTION MAY, 2017 113►V Transactions May 2017, the DMV processed 7,623 transactions 417 more than May 2016. DMV year - to date revenue is $283,675.23 an increase of $39,315.95 or 16.1% over the same period last year. Please see the following graphs for more detail. The conversion to the new State MNLARS program will take effect 7/24/17. All deputy registrar offices will not be able to process motor vehicle transactions from 3:OOpm 7/20 thru 7/22. Per the State, all offices will need to be closed on Saturday 7/22. With limited staff, our office will be open on 7/21 to process DNR and driver's license applications only. $60,000 $50,000 $40,000 $30,000 $20,000 $10,000 9,000 8,000 7,000 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 $300,000 $250,000 $200,000 $150,000 $100,000 $50,000 45,000 40,000 35,000 30,000 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 DMV Revenue Comparison May 2011 May 2012 May 2013 May 2014 May 2015 May 2016 May 2017 DMV Transaction Comparison 7 F.71 7 Mr May 2011 May 2012 May 2013 May 2014 May 2015 May 2016 May 2017 DMV Year -to -Date Revenue Comparison May 2011 May 2012 May 2013 May 2014 May 2015 May 2016 May 2017 DMV Year -to -Date Transaction Comparison 38,676 May 2011 May 2012 May 2013 May 2014 May 2015 May 2016 May 2017 CITY OF Monti eff0 COUNCIL CONNECTION JUNE 26, 2017 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Summary of Recent Meetings: • Specialty Dental Clinic Groundbreaking, 3880 Deegan Ct., May 31, 2017 • Small Area Study Open House, West Bridge Park, May 31, 2017 • Meeting with Premier Bank, June 2, 2017 • Rotary Club Meeting, June 5, 2017 • Meeting with developer regarding Housing Study findings, June 7, 2017 • Rotary Club Meeting, June 12, 2017 • Meeting with Barry Fluth regarding Housing Study Findings, June 13, 2017 • Business Retention & Expansion Meeting with Production Stamping, June 14, 2017 • MnDOT/MN DEED Workshop on TED/TEDI Grant Program, Roseville, MN, June 16, 2017 • Meeting with developer regarding concept development, June 19, 2017 • Rotary Club Meeting, June 19, 2016 • Chamber of Commerce Luncheon Meeting, Community Center, June 20, 2017 CITY OF Monti efl0 COUNCIL CONNECTION JUNE 26, 2017 FINANCE DEPARTMENT Telephone Purchase In May 2017 City Council authorized staff to proceed with purchasing a new telephone system at a cost not to exceed $16,000. When staff put together the final phone order, the total cost was $16,177.00. Specifically, the city needed four more sidecars than included in the original quote at $260.00 per sidecar. This maintains the number of phones with sidecars; it is not an increase of equipment in the new system. The additional $177.00 needed to secure the necessary equipment was authorized by the Finance Director. Arvig anticipates completing the transition for the Monticello Community Center and City Hall first, and then moving on to the DMV, Hi -Way Liquors and Public Works. All departments will have the new phones installed by the end of July. CITY OF �01 kdo COUNCIL CONNECTION JUNE 26, 2017 HI -WAY LIQUORS Sales through May 30, 2017 Attached are schedules and charts for total sales in each major sales category through the end of May 2017. Hi -Way Liquors Sales Report 5/31/2017 Total Sales Month 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 CYM-LYM Jan $ 249,670.43 $ 316,280.10 $ 300,631.85 $ 296,838.64 $ 302,114.52 $ 328,004.13 $ 355,029.76 $ 380,425.45 $ 364,675.32 $ 356,295.18 -2.3% Feb 255,440.36 284,988.38 285,584.50 315,239.00 307,385.41 337,923.99 333,487.18 347,777.77 362,746.98 364,836.39 0.6% Mar 295,257.14 318,050.39 324,062.21 335,032.60 388,195.21 408,071.17 377,391.62 388,003.16 401,256.91 417,005.50 3.9% Apr 281,365.81 346,738.34 369,112.88 389,543.24 347,321.09 388,395.50 389,250.82 421,280.89 428,729.44 448,141.63 4.5% May 377,177.10 384,337.08 399,489.67 409,309.12 433,829.01 436,195.21 498,095.67 523,401.05 482,917.95 503,867.81 4.3% Jun 350,727.93 381,782.23 377,458.15 409,726.07 461,423.68 440,255.04 426,392.73 474,203.81 470,585.33 - Jul 409,870.50 430,838.23 466,122.69 466,738.15 447,452.18 485,459.76 479,174.06 542,973.27 527,519.46 Aug 409,575.96 383,523.07 386,245.30 408,734.83 445,158.94 503,181.84 484,955.71 470,505.22 462,669.36 Sep 317,846.07 346,900.80 346,557.62 373,719.64 390,399.33 379,381.19 397,495.82 439,444.29 448,218.93 Oct 351,268.98 360,742.04 375,367.40 365,702.14 372,676.23 396,328.87 409,967.74 460,096.82 454,442.30 Nov 332,605.88 341,875.49 360,661.96 376,855.40 421,960.12 424,038.37 465,299.53 474,241.74 444,533.08 Dec 436,379.03 454,982.63 485,617.01 505,482.70 527,865.36 518,379.58 549,200.76 569,707.38 605,509.16 Total $4,067,185.19 $4,351,038.78 $4,476,911.24 $4,652,921.53 $4,845,781.08 $5,045,614.65 $5,165,741.40 $5,492,060.85 $ 5,453,804.22 $ 2,090,146.51 Change $ 283,853.59 $ 125,872.46 $ 176,010.29 $ 192,859.55 $ 199,833.57 $ 120,126.75 $ 326,319.45 $ (38,256.63) $(3,363,657.71) Change % 7.0% 2.9% 3.9% 4.1% 4.1% 2.4% 6.3% -0.7% -61.7% $600,000 $500,000 $400,000 $300,000 $200,000 $100,000 Monthly Hi -Way Sales Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec ■ 2008 ■ 2009 ■ 2010 ■ 2011 ■ 2012 ■ 2013 ■ 2014 2015 ■ 2017 Y -T -D -2.3% -0.9% 0.8% 1.9% 2.4% Hi -Way Liquors Sales Report 5/31/2017 Beer Month 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 CYM-LYM Y -T -D Jan $ 122,218.36 $ 157,849.78 $ 146,246.32 $ 143,906.08 $ 149,406.45 $ 160,903.32 $ 173,814.13 $ 191,370.26 $ 176,483.68 $ 174,846.99 -0.9% -0.9% Feb 121,734.33 137,055.23 140,624.54 150,075.08 150,589.28 162,865.75 161,168.63 164,508.11 175,055.27 179,346.12 2.5% 0.8% Mar 138,889.05 155,196.13 164,157.70 163,595.55 203,957.25 192,607.52 185,325.68 192,955.79 199,141.66 208,926.70 4.9% 2.3% Apr 146,613.65 178,834.20 189,978.23 194,504.16 179,486.77 186,134.31 198,195.77 219,756.39 228,133.10 234,069.51 2.6% 2.4% May 201,232.14 210,097.48 223,678.47 208,963.65 227,664.73 234,738.30 256,188.77 259,306.91 250,403.11 262,275.25 4.7% 2.9% Jun 193,801.97 207,793.83 206,043.42 224,769.03 259,671.21 243,389.79 238,322.11 263,421.95 263,264.15 - Jul 226,317.96 229,199.79 260,971.50 258,734.60 253,648.64 273,319.54 265,555.32 301,867.65 296,513.68 Aug 226,653.65 203,222.86 211,996.32 216,546.53 242,179.20 281,577.25 267,802.95 253,141.21 250,255.41 Sep 166,679.60 183,586.32 183,865.70 199,170.24 208,974.88 202,213.80 211,854.94 233,215.56 238,333.55 Oct 176,382.34 179,873.10 190,893.27 180,043.06 187,386.57 191,764.20 210,454.13 234,882.09 224,253.93 Nov 158,322.50 154,584.13 168,265.14 171,866.27 195,276.37 192,162.71 202,081.91 207,055.40 213,333.23 Dec 187,691.06 190,655.19 203,080.13 216,560.71 224,952.83 217,491.21 234,178.12 241,996.27 253,223.11 Total $2,066,536.61 $2,187,948.04 $2,289,800.74 $2,328,734.96 $2,483,194.18 $2,539,167.70 $2,604,942.46 $2,763,477.59 $ 2,768,393.88 $ 1,059,464.57 Change $ 121,411.43 $ 101,852.70 $ 38,934.22 $ 154,459.22 $ 55,973.52 $ 65,774.76 $ 158,535.13 $ 4,916.29 $(1,708,929.31) Change % 5.9% 4.7% 1.7% 6.6% 2.3% 2.6% 6.1% 0.2% -61.7% $350,000 $300,000 $250,000 $200,000 $150,000 i $100,000 $50,000 Jan Feb Mar Monthly Beer Sales Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov ■ 2008 ■ 2009 ■ 2010 ■ 2011 ■ 2012 ■ 2013 ■ 2014 2015 ■ 2017 Dec Hi -Way Liquors Sales Report 5/31/2017 Liquor Month 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 CYM-LYM Y -T -D Jan $ 73,930.87 $ 92,370.42 $ 91,472.50 $ 91,279.01 $ 93,085.69 $ 103,977.89 $ 113,943.25 $ 118,577.85 $ 118,211.20 $ 114,509.99 -3.1% -3.1% Feb 74,261.89 83,513.27 85,484.92 96,541.21 92,489.93 106,387.16 107,609.55 112,198.85 113,060.59 117,361.15 3.8% 0.3% Mar 78,870.42 88,569.65 93,133.42 101,047.04 112,244.43 124,487.55 116,316.49 118,269.49 118,839.79 131,238.09 10.4% 3.7% Apr 76,735.80 90,627.19 95,025.54 110,898.81 98,080.67 113,594.37 115,579.47 123,841.34 126,073.89 130,114.53 3.2% 3.6% May 103,409.29 102,041.75 106,395.62 111,586.59 114,299.35 127,622.31 135,370.38 140,116.66 129,009.36 142,237.28 10.3% 5.0% Jun 91,805.81 103,580.02 102,086.20 115,136.72 128,604.32 124,019.90 120,291.71 136,716.81 135,763.26 - Jul 105,782.85 118,883.98 122,861.98 130,624.19 123,672.73 139,270.04 139,967.77 155,436.54 150,173.35 Aug 106,489.25 103,977.01 101,487.43 113,869.37 126,065.14 141,197.73 138,660.76 136,440.40 135,841.14 Sep 88,448.34 94,335.50 94,528.17 103,373.64 109,153.56 107,605.71 115,119.19 129,195.42 130,101.01 Oct 97,046.60 102,236.90 102,983.14 103,533.14 106,326.73 116,677.74 124,271.15 140,198.97 128,290.50 Nov 97,348.39 90,996.73 102,298.02 105,501.75 120,127.29 126,412.24 134,241.85 132,261.11 134,208.12 Dec 135,221.23 143,684.12 153,690.60 159,717.50 172,370.96 175,523.36 184,746.26 190,944.24 205,335.83 - Total $1,129,350.74 $1,214,816.54 $1,251,447.54 $1,343,108.97 $1,396,520.80 $1,506,776.00 $1,546,117.83 $1,634,197.68 $ 1,624,908.04 $ 635,461.04 Change $ 85,465.80 $ 36,631.00 $ 91,661.43 $ 53,411.82 $ 110,255.21 $ 39,341.83 $ 88,079.85 $ (9,289.64) $ (989,447.00) Change % 7.6% 3.0% 7.3% 4.0% 7.9% 2.6% 5.7% -0.6% -60.9% Monthly Liquor Sales $250,000 ■ 2008 $200,000 ■ 2009 ■ 2010 $150,000 — ■ 2011 ■ 2012 $100,000 — ■ 2013 $50,000 — ■ 2014 2015 $_ 61 ■ 2017 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Hi -Way Liquors Sales Report 5/31/2017 Wine Month 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Jan $ 30,700.42 $ 41,810.19 $ 43,324.18 $ 48,437.59 $ 50,238.83 $ 54,949.83 $ 59,391.16 $ 61,128.65 $ Feb 33,407.17 39,410.85 42,230.84 52,847.05 54,642.27 60,573.12 57,228.51 62,600.47 Mar 47,603.93 45,525.38 46,165.18 54,639.16 57,735.22 77,810.58 66,425.24 67,121.51 Apr 31,755.42 48,303.48 61,146.04 62,289.18 57,973.74 79,736.19 63,101.05 63,285.56 May 38,522.75 40,963.86 45,733.08 68,701.95 78,740.40 62,491.07 92,083.62 109,512.94 Jun 31,796.95 37,522.00 44,211.14 49,089.65 56,607.74 59,523.15 54,270.56 59,036.14 Jul 36,909.44 41,813.65 48,334.93 49,664.45 54,467.20 57,115.44 57,743.98 66,029.11 Aug 35,932.62 41,333.00 46,871.28 53,172.68 61,825.30 64,057.61 62,446.04 63,546.01 Sep 33,830.69 39,798.20 47,859.52 53,916.37 60,317.17 59,121.12 59,409.30 62,210.27 Oct 45,750.04 48,422.79 58,081.87 60,949.40 66,423.82 75,606.28 63,659.41 70,038.32 Nov 50,106.64 66,331.86 71,928.30 85,933.28 97,249.52 96,824.40 117,402.23 122,947.90 Dec 75,866.80 84,285.84 101,676.19 109,267.01 116,610.70 113,008.24 115,617.50 120,274.96 Total $ 492,182.87 $ 575,521.10 $ 657,562.55 $ 748,907.77 $ 812,831.91 $ 860,817.03 $ 868,778.60 $ 927,731.84 $ Change $ 83,338.23 $ 82,041.45 $ 91,345.22 $ 63,924.14 $ 47,985.12 $ 7,961.57 $ 58,953.24 $ Change % 16.9% 14.3% 13.9% 8.5% 5.9% 0.9% 6.8% Monthly Wine Sales $140,000 $120,000 $100,000 $80,000 $60,000 $40,000 $20,000 $- Jan Feb Mar Apr May 2016 2017 CYM-LYM Y -T -D 60,454.56 $ 57,275.16 -5.3% -5.3% 64,797.38 58,664.45 -9.5% -7.4% 71,840.82 64,286.75 -10.5% -8.6% 61,268.24 69,415.79 13.3% -3.4% 87,333.35 82,724.29 -5.3% -3.9% 54,889.39 - 60,750.62 60,015.78 65,294.31 89,005.29 83,896.45 129,536.28 - 889,082.47 $ 332,366.44 (38,649.37) $ (556,716.03) -4.2% -62.6% ■ 2008 ■ 2009 ■ 2010 ■ 2011 ■ 2012 ■ 2013 ■ 2014 2015 ■ 2017 Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec $6.0 $5.5 $5.0 c $4.5 $4.0 $3.5 $3.0 Liquor Store Sales - Rolling 12 Month Periods J N w — -6 0 3 E 1 N 0 3 E 1 N 0 3 N w — -6 0 J N w — -6 0 J N w — -6 0 3 91 d 0 3 91 d 0 J d 91 lD O F+ N W A l!1 Ol V CITY OF Monti eff0 COUNCIL CONNECTION JUNE 26, 2017 HUMAN RESOURCES 2017 Pay Equity Report The City was recently notified that based on the 2017 submittal we have met the requirements of the Local Government Pay Equity Act. The next compliance report is due in 2020. Paid Time Off (PTO) - Bargaining Unit Employees At the 2017 contract negotiations earlier this year the bargaining unit employees agreed to consider and vote on adopting the PTO program in 2017 separate from the contract negotiations. A vote was held on June 15t and the by a vote of 8-5 the employees voted to accept the PTO program as proposed. The transition to PTO will occur the first full pay period in July. The bargaining unit program is identical PTO program adopted in 2016 for non -bargaining unit employees. CITY OF �01 kdo COUNCIL CONNECTION JUNE 26, 2017 MONTICELLO COMMUNITY CENTER (MCC) Building Improvements This month we are completing the tile restoration projects of the facility restrooms. The before and after pictures attached are from the women's restroom tile restoration. We have also completed some painting projects and the stripping and waxing of the terrazzo flooring throughout the building. Before Transactions and visits After Year to date (5.31.17), the MCC processed 48,455 transactions, 8,447 less than this time last year. The MCC year to date revenue is $666,779, a decrease of $2,546 from the same time last year. Year to date membership visits are 67,452 total visits, which is 1,726 visits down from last year. MCC memberships are at a total of 2,086 active memberships. u -i o N °Q Y o ro IR o R m W M M mO 4LL'] M1mM1Mam a O J W � MoM1 M1allo'trmui M f+ot pO sp M it NMa PI r �?n Mr ry�M 0 F- m 7 r r r Council Connection - 6/26/17 orf ns �2 M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 is is (313 :'(3a N MmMMM rM1 V oaN MW Ln]m t (2 ep N m N o m M1 M1 a s a m m M m M1 Ln M o r 2 r 11 IM1 f+mmO. om4a��NL ��mri ' ? ep Ln m M m m m m M M1 N N L[7a a¢ m M r a r Q MLv Ln7M rNNNM a r[V ep rut Ln r r Y r h W o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o m o o N o 0 0 aau; m �+a M1Lna aLn LL; LL;aaO mu'7N rr', ra maN r �p J �r~i m p Cp 6- r r W LLJ LLI H w Z 1.1 LA z W dW w W CO LL, W ae W m 0 pJ ZLLI��cfiu3 W YZ W D W z LI =ww0�� U�?w Z)w� LU `mow LLI 5 w��21 F FLLIZ � W LLI R� nj Ello W o o ui m N M1 M1 a o a u'S 0'0 drL LLU}�DdLLU CHH❑ W F L j L,] N Ln O O m a M N m a o N C1 M M r Ln Ln L�, N o m �+ N m r m? M1 M1 m LL'] M1 Nam m o m m m a M o g o m a a q m LL; Ln Ln ry o' ti � g � � r r r g r Nr VM1M1 VCM r ry CVM1rNM1 rNa[VN�r g MM wM1M d N o m a N N m N m m M1 m N W O w M m Mar M m N ui r N a N a M M1 Li m m Q w J raNMrarLv mLnNdNM mN m mouiNorNm m � a CNmo m ep o N ep �ryNar Ln marLn M1Mmm L;N a oaMN �nui ui m aM��Nm � epr ' n �2� LL' mL[; Lc Nom raMN ML+d Lvd N ea Ln to ca �+ m1+[V m M m 1+ n Ln m mNr m M avr W L n N r a w a m r M � N M M r Ln Ln u' S r m N omM1ammoS^'] 4] 4� [•]ao MM1 amaMmNLC]M1 u'] M1M m ep W r r Q m r a l[7 M m m a O m m N am�Mo �a�mNoMu - ' rL N r� a j+ m r a M r m a H9 M a M L m m MMaoo Y+ ml+Ix Nui Ix x1p NO M CS ' �P 6P gym= i roo rY+u'S O [�NMNre NomNMN r o M m a as m MaNNMar oo1-M MmNaroo m m r r N r r a r n s7 67 V ti m m N v m so N W H W M1 rM1 inmMrMM10 r m Iti m aM M1r+j+m M M o m a a�n t�u�N d m N N N �C= a SLC] mmru']a mrn a mj+a '�u'S mj+mmm ' Ir M1 w mM�Of+N mMma arCV Amo m as oui u'S rr+u'S ' iflNmo uim [n N �� ' m rr d� [C.�fr aoroN eo �M a ammrmo m Not?M1 mM1N �C+ mm ry H Ltifro Nm r �r r! Mr rr W rMNa �mNM1oin m m M1i+aa an Lna mM1m as LL; Ln m ao = a m a o a m M1 o a o a m N� m m �+ ' Lp ' m ' a m a M1 r o M a m M M1 N r Q m m� m m o ItiFNM a Nl ro c T N Mr M r mr rM rr M1 M1NoNM1mu�MM1mNu�NMti ti M1NMMmMM1mu�oMu'SMM1oNmrrimN I� 00 W aLC]aoNm l[]Nm M1p r os o N r N a Ln or r o r o m �C Sp eP Mm MMm au"]�C]mNMLC]�C] m[rim j+ u; N u, M— u) c ep 4O eG Q Q_ ~ r _ m C� r M r IY 1 f 1 o = N � M[yrr NNm ea'iaN rrrN M1 rM1 r is7I In ti r h W o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o m o o N o 0 0 aau; m �+a M1Lna aLn LL; LL;aaO mu'7N rr', ra maN r �p J �r~i m p Cp 6- r r W LLJ LLI H w Z 1.1 LA z W dW w W CO LL, W ae W m 0 pJ ZLLI��cfiu3 W YZ W D W z LI =ww0�� U�?w Z)w� LU `mow LLI 5 w��21 F FLLIZ � W LLI R� nj Ello LLI d°°owww n O � !Y 0'0 drL LLU}�DdLLU CHH❑ m aa a a a a a M1 a a a a M1 a a a a a ry Q v m MLL'] O LC] NN o I4o xaMN am LnaMoL4� co v �NL[7ryN�Mry Ln mrryM1 ryd m W F- U z F W LLI 0 U LLI D v - LLI d0� ¢a 1'LLI ~ W W �� In LLI W �0 �UME?Z- HO LU z W [fi 00D U W LLI 0 LLI LLI LLI LLI LL,}d y W W J L.1Zd2u7 u7 u}u}u7 u7 u} � Ww E LLI LLI LLI LLI 0uj w u}u7 u7 u7 u}[f,�� Ov'Z W ILnLL Ewwwwwwrwi,rwi,LL,LL,rLL,rLULLI �Ha r S O J J J J J J IN WJW W YW CL CL CL CL L� LL LL L� L� L� LLH F Q L a rLCLCLCLrLCLCLoa00000 z SLLIr r� u.l [[[111555 W 0 d, d, 0 0 tl, [I- L1 L1 d d d L1 W` a' O d = CITY OF Monti eff0 COUNCIL CONNECTION JUNE 26, 2017 PARKS DEPARTMENT Staff is working on the following tasks listed below: • Chipping requests • Cemetery; selling and locating graves • Locating Riverside grave lot pins • Equipment/vehicle repairs • Park rental setups • Routine building maintenance • Picnic table construction • Fertilizing • Mower maintenance • BCOL field maintenance • Pathway sidewalk tree trimming • Stump grinding • Snow equipment repairs • Park sign repairs • Park sign construction Updates: • Storm Cleanup: Staff has been busy cleaning up storm damage brush for residents, as well as clearing down trees obstructing various pathways. • Montiview Park Cleanup: Volunteers are asked to help with park cleanup in the woods, along the trails and with trail building at Montiview Park on Saturday, June 24ffi, from 10am-3pm. Volunteers should meet at the park at 5980 Jason Avenue and bring gloves and bug spray and the DirtWirx crew will provide tools. Hot dogs will be grilled for the helpers after the cleanup. • Ellison Park: The new structure is 75% complete. Staff poured the concrete floor this week. • 41h Street Park: The new basketball court has been installed. Council Connection — 06/26/17 STREET DEPARTMENT Shop: The shop has been busy doing normal maintenance on equipment and vehicles with other repairs as listed: • With the wind storm our mechanic has also been out on the streets helping with brush clean up and sign repairs. • Replaced gutter brooms on units 132 & 108. Streets: • Sign maintenance. • Boulevard tree trimming in various areas. • Spring sweeping is underway. • We have started our crack seal program and are working in the Groveland area. • Speed trailer is being moved to various areas in the community. • Blacktop patching in the 2017 chip seal areas. Stormwater: • City crews have been doing maintenance in some of the storm water ponds. Storm Damage: The storm that blew threw Monticello on June 11th did quite a bit of tree damage, building damage, sign damage and street light damage from a line east of Edmunson Avenue to the city limits. City crews have been doing cleanup for the past two weeks. Crews have made two passes through all subdivisions and now are on an on-call basis for storm damage brush pickup which we will fit into our normal work schedules. SEWER & WATER DEPARTMENT The Sewer & Water Department has been working on the following items. • Storm damage cleanup throughout the city. • Cleaning sanitary sewers in the northeast quadrant. • Exercising water valves in the northeast quadrant. • Locating water, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer services. • Inspecting new residential and commercial water, sanitary, and storm sewer services. • Installing new water meters in all new buildings. • Checking low and high water usages on residential and commercial accounts. • Will begin working with the Core City Improvement Project on June 26. Storm Update: During the June 11 storm, all the lift stations lost power except the Marvin Road and Chelsea Road lift stations. All five lift station generators ran about 1.5 hours, except Meadow Oak lift station which ran over 13 hours. On the water side, we ran Well #5 for 1.5 hours on generator power and also ran Well #3 with the reservoir boosters for 1.5 hours on generator power.