City Council Agenda Packet 10-11-1999
.
.
.
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL
Monday, October 11,1999 - 7 p.m.
Mayor:
Roger Belsaas
Council Members:
Roger Carlson, Clint Ilerbst, Brian Stumpf and Bruce Thielen
1 . Call to Order
2 A. Approval of minutes of the regular meeting of September 27,1999.
3. Consideration of adding items to the agenda.
4. Citizen comments/petitions, request and complaints.
5. Consent agenda.
A. Consideration to review GMEF Loan No. 017 (fwin City Die Castings Company)
for compliance with EDA-GMEF Business Subsidy Criteria.
B.
Consideration to approve a proclamation proclaiming the week of October 25-29,
1999 to be City of Monticello Minnesota Manufacturers Week.
C. Consideration of adoption of a resolution establishing a negative declaration of
impact relating to the Groveland Subdivision Environmental Assessment
Worksheet.
D. Item 5D was removed from the agenda.
E. Consideration of Conditional Use Permit to allow three or more business signs on
a commercial building at 106 & 106 1;2 West Broadway - Applicant: Gregory
Dunn, DDS.
F. Consideration of a request for a Conditional Use Permit within the 1-1 Zoning
District to allow outdoor storage of equipment and materials. Applicant: Mainline
Distribution Properties.
G.
Consideration of approval of applicants who currently hold retail on-sale liquor
licenses to become liquor providers at the Monticello Community Center for
calendar year 2000.
H.
~ ~tJ"v
Consideration of approval of preliminary plat 'of Monticello Commerce Center 4th
Addition. Applicant: City of Monticello.
6. Consideration of items removed from the consent agenda for discussion.
.
.
.
Agenda
Monticello City Council
October 11, 1999
Page Two
7. Consideration of Wright County Economic Development - Heidi Peper.
8. Consideration to approve funding for acquisition of the property located at I Locust
Street
9. Review of bids for Project 98-15C, Bridge Park Lift Station and consideration of
awarding contract.
10. Consideration of approval of Change Order #1 to Project No. 99-01C, Kjellberg
Sanitary Sewer Extension.
11. Discussion speed limit on County Road 75 from the Middle School to freeway
Councilmember Herbst
12. Approve bills for October.
13.
Adjourn.
~~~_ Cil- {.-"fr~crlo,v .' tilt., /:4Lft:-.-r7 cy4e.
~ ~ ~ ru~~~nL
It.
.
.
.
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL
Monday, September 27, 1999 - 7 p.m.
Members Present:
Roger Belsaas, Roger Carlson, Clint Herbst, Brian Stumpf and Bruce
Thielen.
Members Absent:
None
Mayor Belsaas called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. and declared a quorwn present.
2.A. Approval of minutes of the reswIar meeting: held September 13. 1999.
CLINT HERBST MOVED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 13,1999.
ROGER CARLSON SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
3.
Consideration of adding: items to the agenda.
Clint Herbst requested that discussion of the parking at the new Goodyear Tire site be added to
the agenda.
4.
Citizens comments/petitions. requests. and comuIaints.
Chris Thelen, president of the student body, came before the Council to request approval of a
bonfire on October 6,1999 as part of the homecoming activities. The fire department
personnel will be present at the bonfire.
BRIAN STUMPF MOVED TO APPROVE THE BONFIRE AS PART OF THE
MONTICELLO HOMECOMING ACTIVITIES CONTINGENT UPON THE FIRE
DEPARTMENT PERSONNEL BEING ON HAND. CLINT HERBST SECONDED THE
MOTION. MOTION CARRIED.
Chris Thelen also asked if City approval is needed for the route for the Homecoming parade.
Mayor Belsaas indicated that the route should be okayed by the Wright County Sheriffs
Department.
Roman Brauch came before the Council regarding a business being conducted from a residence
located at 705 Wcst River Street and requested that the City take action. The owner of the
business will be relocating to the Grimsmo Funeral Horne when that site is vacated. Because
the problem would be resolved when the business was relocated, it was not brought before the
Council. However, the business owner was contacted by the City concerning the vehicles
dR
.
.
.
Council Minutes - 9/27/99
parked at the site. The City had initially issued a home occupation permit on one site for the
business. The business is currently operating out of two residential sites. It was noted that
home occupations have restrictions on number of employees, parking, etc. and Mr. Brauch did
not feel the business was in compliance with these restrictions. The City will contact the
business owner regarding his business operation in a residential zone.
5.
Consent Agenda.
A. Consideration of a resolution establishing various fees and charges relating to licensing
of tattoo/body piercing establishments. Recommendation: Approve resolution setting
forth license, application and investigative fees for tattoo/body piercing
establishments.(RES. #99-55)
B. Consideration of approving a three (3) month membership fee for the Monticello
Community Center and approving a Combined Membership plan and fees between Life
Fitness Centers and MCC. Recommendation: The City Council approve the three (3)
month Fun Pass and the Combined Membership program as written.
C.
Consideration to approve Business Subsidy Agreement between the EDA and Aroplax
Corporation for GMEF Loan No. 016. Recommendation: The City Council approve
the Business Subsidy Agreement between the EDA and Aroplax Corporation [or GMEF
Loan No. 016.
Clint Herbst questioned the breakdown of fees on item 5B on the consent agenda. Kitty Baltos
indicated that she would get the information that would clarify how the fee rates were
determined.
BRUCE THIELEN MOVED TO REMOVE ITEM #5B FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA
AND TABLE IT TO LATER IN THE MEETING. BRIAN STUMPF SECONDED THE
MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
BRUCE THIELEN MOVED TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. BRIAN STUMPF
SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSL Y.
6. Consideration of items removed from the consent ae:enda for discussion.
Item #5B was removed from the consent agenda and discussion was tabled until later in the
meeting.
7.
Public Hearing - Consideration of issuing an on-sale liquor license - Monticello Country
Club.
Mayor Belsaas opened the public hearing for the on-sale liquor license application for the
Monticello Country Club. Clint Herbst expressed his concern about the liquor license for this
2
;}A
.
.
.
Council Minutes - 9/27/99
facility. He noted that the minimum standards for restaurants that the Council had adopted
indicated that a restaurant facility with an on-sale license would be a full time operation. When
the expansion of the facility was reviewed by the Planning Commission there were concerns
about the amount of traffic that would be generated by the expansion. The applicant at that
time indicated that the restaurant facility would be somewhat seasonal and its operation would
coincide with the golf season. He felt there was some inconsistency in what was presented to
the Planning Commission and what was being presented in order to meet the standards for an
on-sale license. The impression that was given at the Planning Commission was that this was a
banquet facility and not a full service restaurant. It appears now that in order to obtain an
on-sale license it would have to be a full service restaurant. There was Council discussion on
the standards established for the on-sale license and whether the Council may want to add
to the criteria. It was pointed out that the applicant did meet the existing criteria for an on-sale
license for a restaurant. Mayor Belsaas closed the public hearing.
BRIAN STUMPF MOVED TO APPROVE THE ON-SALE LIQUOR LICENSE FOR THE
MONTICELLO COUNTRY CLUB WITH THE COUNCIL TO REVIEW THE LIQUOR
LICENSE AT THE END OF ONE YEAR AND ALSO THE CRITERIA FOR ON-SALE
LICENSES. BRUCE THIELEN SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED
UNANIMOUSL Y.
8.
Public Hearine: - Consideration to adopt a resolution authorizine: application to DTED for
funding an economic development project.
Ollie Koropchak explained the purpose of the public hearing and introduced Lenny Kirseht who
presented information to the Council concerning the grant application for Twin City Die
Castings Company. The City is requesting $500,000 which would be a loan to the company to
assist them in purchasing equipment for their facility located at 520 Chelsea Road
(Lot 1, Block 1, Monticello Commerce Center 4th Addition). The building size is 36,000 sq. ft.
with plans for future expansion and will create approximately 89 new jobs. The project cost is
$7,900,000. Mayor Belsaas then opened the public hearing. There was no one present to speak
for or against the proposal. Mayor Belsaas then closed the public hearing.
BRUCE THIELEN MOVED TO APPROVE THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT RESOLUTION,
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM AUTHORIZING APPLICATION TO THE
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRADE AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FOR THE
TWIN CITY DIE CASTINGS COMPANY. ROGER CARLSON SECONDED THE MOTION
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. (RES. 99-56)
9.
Consideration of a request for a Conditional Use Permit within the B-3 Zoning District to
allow Outdoor Sales and Display of automobiles and a Conditional Use Permit Planned
Unit Development to allow the automobile sales operation to be located on two separate
parcels. Applicant: Automaxx Car Stores.
At a special meeting of the Planning Commission on September 27, 1999 at 5:30 the Planning
3
dA
.
.
.
Council Minutes - 9/27/99
Commission acted upon a request for an auto sales facility in a B-3 Zoning District and a request
for a conditional use permit fl)f planned unit development which would allow the operation to be
located on two separate parcels. JeffO'NeiJl summarized the Planning Commission review of
the request and informed the Council that the Planning Commission had recommended approval
based on the revised site plan that was submitted. The original site plan showed a 5' setback
while on the revised site plan the setback was 1'. The Planning Commission felt that under the
Planned Unit Development it was acceptable to go with the I' setback in order to enhance tral1ic
flow on the site and allow adequate drive access.
BRIAN STUMPF MOVED TO APPROVE THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR AUTO
SALES/DISPLA Y FOR AUTOMAXX CAR STORES BASED ON A FINDING THAT
THE USE IS APPROPRIATE FOR THE ZONING DISTRICT AND THE PROPOSED SrrE
SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS LISTED IN THE REVISED EXHIBIT Z. BRUCE
THIELEN SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
BRIAN STUMPF MOVED TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT BASED ON A FINDING THAT THE SHARED DISPLAY AREA IS A
REASONABLE USE OF THE PARCELS IN THIS LOCATION AND THAT THE
REDUCTION IN SETBACK TO ONE FOOT IS NECESSARY FOR ENHANCED TRAFFIC
FLOW AND SAFE DRIVE ACCESS. CLINT HERBST SECONDED THE MOTION.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
10.
Consideration of an offer to purchase City owned parcel adiacent to newly created
Chelsea Road East between TH 25/Cedar Street.
City Administrator, Rick Wolfsteller, summarized the proposals received. There was discussion
with the City Engineer about enlarging the parcel by adding a ten foot strip from the right-of-way
on one side of the parcel. The City received two proposals as follows:
. Mielke - $3.00/sq. ft. with the contingency that the City relocate the watermain
situated on the parcel.
. Peterson - $4.25/sq. ft. with no contingency.
It was also pointed out by Mr. Mielke that he has first right of refusal and under that right is to be
informed of all the terms and conditions of the Peterson offer. Mr. Mielke asked if any
variances, access or signage had been approved by the City as part of the negotiations on the
Peterson offer. Rick Wolfsteller indicated that there were no conditions or terms negotiated.
The only issue that was discussed was the watermain on the property. If the City decides for
some reason to relocate the watermain, the City would bear the full cost of relocation. If the
property owner decides to relocate the line, then the property owner would bear the cost of
relocation.
4
dA
.
.
.
Council Minutes - 9/27/99
BRIAN STlJMPF MOVED TO AGREE TO SELL THE REMNANT PARCEL OWNED BY
THE CrI'Y TO MR. PETERSON AT $4.25/SQ. FT. NOTING TIIA T MR. MIELKE WOULD
I-IA VE TEN DAYS TO MATCH THE OFFER AS PROPOSED PER THE RIGHT OF FIRST
REFUSAL AGREEMENT. BRUCE THIELEN SECONDED THE MOTION.
At this point Mr. Mielke requested the opportunity to make a counterproposal. Noting that his
motion was still on the t1oor, Brian Stumpf stated he would remove his motion from
consideration at this time. Brucc Thielcn agreed to remove his second to the motion Mr. Mielke
then submitted his proposal to purchase the property at $4.25 sq. ft. with the contingency of the
City relocating the watermain. Mr. Mielke fclt that the value of his offer with the development
that would take place would be worth the cost of relocating the line for the City.
Discussion continued on the type of development that would take placc on thc parcel. At a
previous meeting a value figure of $3,000,000-$4,000,000 was discussed for the Mielke
development. In the presentation made tonight Mr. Mielke referred to a valuation of $1 ,000,000
to $1,500,000 and Mr. Mielke was asked to clarify the figures. He responded that the $3,000,000
to $4,000,000 was the cost of developing the parcel and the $1,000,000 to $1,500,000 was the
estimated valuation the assessor's office would show for the development.
BRIAN STUMPF MOVE TO REINSTATE HIS ORIGINAL MOTION. BRUCE THIELEN
SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED WrTH ROGER CARLSON VOTING IN
OPPOSITION.
The City was requested by Dan Mielke to submit a complete legal description ofthe parcel along
with all the terms and conditions of the offer from Dave Peterson
11. Consideration of an ordinance amendment reeulatine solicitors. peddlers and transient
merchants.
The Council reviewed the proposed amendment to the transient merchant ordinance that would
require peddlers and solicitors to register with the City. The ordinance does contain a provision
that would exempt charitable and religious organizations. The Council discussed what problems
cxist with the peddlers and solicitors, what changes would resolve the problem and what type of
changes could be made in the ordinance that could be easily enforced. The Council felt that the
City should start with the ordinance amendment as proposed and then review the ordinance
again at a later date if problems persisted with peddlers and solicitors.
CLINT HERBST MOVED TO ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT AS PROPOSED
THAT WOULD REQUIRE THE REGISTRATION OF ANY PEDDLER OR SOLICITOR
INCLUDING RELIGIOUS AND CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONS AND WOULD
CONTINUE THE PROCESS OF PERMITTING TRANSIENT MERCHANTS. BRIAN
STUMPF SECONDED THE MOTION. MaTrON CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
5
.
.
.
Council Minutes - 9/27/99
12.
Consideration of establishiU1! a process for the sale of senior citizens facility.
City Administrator, Rick Wolfsteller informed the Council that he had received several inquiries
about the senior citizens facility and brought this up to the Council to get some direction on how
they want to handle it. After discussing the various options, it was felt that the Council should
set a price and then they could review any oiTers that were received.
BRIAN STUMPF MOVED TO SET AN ASKING PRICE FOR THE SENIOR CITIZEN
FACILITY AT $190,000 AND ACCEPT OFFERS FOR A PERIOD OF 60 DA YS WITH ALL
OFFERS AND TERMS CONSIDERED BY THE COUNCIL BRUCE THIELEN SECONDED
THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
13. Approve pavment of bills for second half of September.
BRIAN STUMPF MOVED TO APPROVE PAYMENT OF BILLS. ROGER CARLSON
SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
The Council then discussed Item 5B which had been tabled earlier in the meeting. Kitty Baltos
explained how the fees for the combined membership were arrived at. The monthly rate for each entity
was discounted 25% and then combined. Mayor Belsaas pointed out that the fees could be adjusted
at a later date if needed.
ROGER CARLSON MOVED TO APPROVE THE THREE MONTH FUN PASS AND THE
COMBINED MEMBERSHIP PROGRAM AS WRITTEN. BRUCE THIELEN SECONDED THE
MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Clint Herbst brought up the parking on Cedar Street by the Goodyear Tire store. In previous Council
action the staff was directed to place "No Parking" signs on Cedar Street but none had been installed.
The Council directed that the signs be erected
BRUCE THIELEN MOVED TO ADJOURN AT 8:35 P.M. BRIAN STUMPF SECONDED THE
MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSL Y.
Recording Secretary
6
dA
. City Council Agenda - 10/11/99
5A. Consideration to review Greater Monticello Enterorise Fund (GMEF) Loan No. 017
(Twin City Die Castine:s Company) for comoliance with the EDA-GMEF Business
Subsidy Criteria. (O.K.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
The EDA requests the City Council review GMEF Loan No. 017 for compliance with the
EDA-GMEF Business Subsidy Criteria. The GMEF Guidelines state: "The EDA shall
have authority to approve or deny loans; however, within 21 days of ED A approval, the
City Council may reverse a decision by the EDA to approve a loan if it is determined by
Council that such loan was issued in violation of the GMEF Guidelines."
On September 28, 1999, the EDA approved GMEF Loan No. 017 for Twin City Die
Castings Company. The approval was subject to funding commitments from the state and
on the bonds and evidence of the company's financial creditibility. For your review,
enclosed as supporting data is the outline used by the EDA for determination of GMEF
public purpose and policy compliance.
.
The machinery and equipment loan was approved for $100,000 at a 6.25% fixed interest
rate with amortization up to 7 years. Loan fee set at $200 and GMEF legal fees the
responsibility of the applicant. The GMEF loan will take a shared second-position with
the Minnesota Investment Fund and behind the industrial revenue bonds. Collateral,
guarantees, and other condition requirements to be determined and prepared by the GMEF
attorney. The Monticello facility will employ 89 people by June 2002 and they will
construct an approximate 52,000 sq ft building in two phases. At least 90% of the new
jobs to pay a rate equal to or greater than 160% ofthe federal minimum wage, exclusive
of benefits, for individuals over the age of20 during the term of the assistance. Annual
written reports are required until termination date. Failure to meet the job and wage level
goals require partial or full repayment of the assistance with interest. After preparation of
the Loan Agreement and at a future Council meeting, the Council will be asked to approve
a Subsidy Agreement between the EDA and Twin City Die Castings Company to comply
with the new statutory requirements. Because the assistance does not exceed $100,000, a
public hearing is not required.
This expansion is located at 520 Chelsea Road in the Monticello Commerce Center.
After review ofthe EDA outline for GMEF public purpose and policy compliance, the
EDA requests the City Council consider the following actions.
.
1
.
City Council Agenda - 10/11/99
B.
ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1.
A motion stating that City Council has determined the EDA approval of GMEF
Loan No. 017 for Twin City Die Castings Company was approved without
violation ofthe EDA-GMEF Business Subsidy Criteria; therefore, Council
supports the decision by the EDA for loan approval.
2.
A motion stating that City Council has determined the EDA approval of GMEF
Loan No. 017 for Twin City Die Castings Company was issued in violation ofthe
GMEF Guidelines; therefore, the Council reverses the decision by the EDA for
loan approval.
c.
ST AFF RECOMMENDATION:
The City Administrator recommends Alternative No.1. The loan approval complies with
the EDA-GMEF Criteria and the City's objective and goals. At the EDA meeting, the
commissioners reviewed the three-year financial statements of the company and
Koropchak pointed out the positive current asset to current liability ratio and the net
income was sufficient to cover the projected debt service ofthe expansion project without
increased profits.
.
D.
SUPPORTING DATA:
GMEF criteria used by the EDA, preliminary application, and GMEF approval form.
.
2
.
.
.
EDA Agenda - 9/28/99
4.
Consideration to review the oreliminary GMEF loan aoolication from Twin City Die
Castings Company for comoliance with the EDA Business Subsidy Criteria.
A. Reference and Background:
GMEF Loan Request: See Attachment A.
$100,000 Machinery and Equipment Loan.
Project Summary:
Jay Eller, Marketing Manager, at Twin City Die Castings Company will be at the EDA
meeting. Jay will be the plant manager of the facility in Monticello. Previously, the
company owners Jim Harmon and Steve Harmon visited Monticello.
Twin City Die Castings Company (TCDC) is an 80-year old manufacturer of cast metal
parts headquartered in Minneapolis, MN. Between its headquarters and its Watertown,
SD facilities, TCDC employs approximately 300 people and generates annual sales in
excess of $40 million per year.
TCDC is proposing the establishment of a Magnesium Casting division in Monticello.
Although a relatively new process, TCDC anticipates that it will be able to provide cast
parts at a very competitive level in this fast growing market. Magnesium castings are
becoming increasingly in demand as the automotive industry seeks to utilize lighter, high
quality parts in its efforts to improve fuel economy. While raw materials are more
expensive than aluminum, the company will achieve better efficiency with magnesium,
thereby achieving acceptable margins.
TCDC site location in Monticello is a six-acre parcel lying south of Chelsea Road and
immediately west of the new high school entrance road. The Phase Ia construction project
consists of an approximate 36,000 sq ft office/manufacturing facility with occupancy
scheduled for June 2000 and the Phase Ib construction project consists of approximately a
16,000 sq ft addition with occupancy for June 2002. Total employment of89 jobs at an
average wage of $17. 06 per hour plus a benefit value of $5.47 per hour. The company
anticipates this facility in the future to consist of a total of 80,000 sq ft.
Uses and Sources
In order to save time, please see Attachment B which is the estimated uses and sources
statements as prepared by Lenny Kirscht who is packaging the application for the
Minnesota Investment Fund. You will notice, there are individual uses and sources for the
real estate financing and the machinery and equipment financing. The GMRF will be a
1
SA
.
.
"
.
EDA Agenda - 9/28/99
part of the machinery and equipment financial package and the GMEF will be in a shared
second-position with the Minnesota Investment Fund behind the industrial revenue bonds.
Also attached is a list of the equipment for purchase.
Please review the application for compliance with the EDA-GMEF Business Subsidy
Criteria.
GREATER MONTICELLO ENTERPRISE FUND GUIDELINES
PUBLIC PURPOSE CRITERIA: Must comply with four or more of the criteria listed
below, criteria #1 being mandatory.
1.
Job Goal:
89 new full-time jobs to the City of Monticello within two years of
the benefit date.
Wage Goal:
At least 80 of the new jobs must be at a rate equal to or
greater than $8.24, excluding benefits, for individuals over
the age of 20 during the term of the assistance.
Annual reports are required until termination date. Failure to meet job and wage
goals require partial or full payment of the assistance plus interest.
See Attachment C - Job and wage-level goals.
2. Increases the community tax base: The construction of the Phase la 36,000 sq
ft manufacturing/warehousing space
($1,018,000 EMV) is estimated to increase
the tax base by $43,643 annually.
The construction of the Phase 1b 16,000 sq
ft manufacturing space ($468,810 EMV) is
estimated to increase the tax base by $20,988
annually.
3.
Factors:
To assist a new manufacturing business to expand their
manufacturing operations.
Other factors for consideration but not limited to: Nature of
business (manufacturing), present availability of service and
product (similar to Remmele Engineering), potential adverse
environmental effects (none), and compatibility to the
comprehensive plan and zoning policy (yes, expansion tip-up
panel).
2
5A
,
.
EDA Agenda - 9/28/99
4.
U sed as a secondary source to supplement conventional financing:
The GMEF will be the third source of funding with the bonds and MN
Investment Fund for the equipment financing. The total project including
real estate will utilize conventional financing, SBA., and TIF.
5. Used as gap financing: Used as gap financing (Letter forward coming from
Lender) and as an incentive to encourage expansion
development.
6. Used to assist other funds: In addition to the GMEF, other funds obtained are
SBA., Bonds, MN Investment Fund, TIF, and equity.
GREATER MONTICELLO ENTERPRISE FUND POLICIES
1. BUSINESS ELIGffiILITY:
Industrial business: Yes.
.
Located within city limits: Yes, Zoned I-IA.
Credit worthy existing business:
F or determination by Lenny Kirscht, Park
National Bank. (Letter to be provided at
meeting. )
$10,000 loan per each job created. $10,000 X 89 = $890,000.
$5,000 per every $20,000 increase in property market valuation, whichever is
higher. $1,486,810 divided by $20,000 = 74 X $5,000 = $371,702.
Criteria: $100,000.
II. FINANCING METHOD:
Companion Direct Loan:
All such loans may be subordinated to the primary
lender(s) if requested by the primary lender(s). The
GMEF is leveraged and the lower interest rate of the
GMEF lowers the effective interest rate on the entire
project.
.
Criteria: The GMEF take a shared second-position with the Minnesota Investment
Fund behind the Bonds on the machinery and equipment.
3
sA
EDA Agenda - 9/28/99
.
ill
USES OF PROCEEDS:
Machinery and equipment.
IV. TERMS AND CONDITIONS:
Loan Size: Maximum not to exceed 50% of the remaining revolving loan fund
balance. Approximate balance September 27, 1999, $404,227.66
Request: $100,000. Criteria: $100,000. Remaining balance
thereafter, $304,227.66.
Leveraging: Minimum 60% private/public non-GMEF. Maximum 30% GMEF.
Minimum 10% equity of GMEF loan.
State Bonds
MN Investment Fund
GMEF
Equity
TOTAL
$4,550,000 (82%)
$ 500,000 (9%)
$ 100,000 (2%)
$ 392,000 (7%)[>10%EDA]
$5,542,000 (100%)
.
Loan Term: Personal property term not to exceed life of equipment (generally
5-7 years).
Criteria: Term seven years.
Interest Rate: Fixed rate not less than 2% below Minneapolis prime rate. Prime
rate per National Bank (First Bank) of Minneapolis on date of ED A
loan approval. Prime rate September 28, 1999 is %. ~ . ~ S
Criteria: Minimum'- :)9/0 fixed rate.
Loan Fee:
Minimum fee of $200 but not to exceed 1. 5% of the total loan
project. Paid by applicant to the EDA within five working days
after City Council approval of GMEF loan. Non-refundable. Loan
fee may be incorporated into project cost. EDA retains the right to
reduce or waive loan fee or portion ofloan fee.
Criteria: Minimum fee of $200, due and payable not later than October 16,
1999.
Prepayment Policy: No penalty for prepayment.
.
4
5A
. EDA Agenda - 9/28/99
Deferral of Payments: 1. Approval of the EDA membership by majority vote.
2. Extend the balloon if unable to refinance.
verification letter from two lending institutions
subject to Board approval.
Late Payment Policy: Failure to pay principal or interest when due may result in
the loan being immediately called.
Interest limitation on guaranteed loans:
Not applicable.
Assumability ofloan: None.
Business equity requirements:
Subject to type ofloan; Board of Directors
will determine case by case. analysis under
normal lending guidelines.
Collateral:
Machinery and equipment liens (except equipment exempt from
bankruptcy) and personal and/or corporate guarantees (requires
unlimited personal guarantees) as per the GMEF attorney.
.
Non-performance:
An approved GMEF loan shall be null and void if funds are
not drawn upon or disbursed within 180 days from date of
EDA approval.
September 28, 1999 EDA approval - loan becomes null and void March 28,
2000.
Non-performance extension: Not applicable.
Legal Fee:
Responsibility of the GMEF applicant.
B. Recommendation:
Recommendation is to review this information prior to the EDA meeting for discussion
and potential questions. Jay Eller will be present at the EDA meeting. Consideration to
approve or deny GMEF Loan No. 017 is the next agenda item.
C. Suooortinsz Data:
.
Preliminary GMEF application. job and wage-level goals. uses and sources. equipment list,
and executed waivers.
'b'~.5Y
~ 5
sF\
.
.
.
GREATER MONTICELLO ENTERPRISE
250 EAST BROADWAY
MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA
A""6 fJ"'~
A
PRELIMINARY APPLICATION FOR LOAN
APPLICANT: ,..)AI...\ E.rf e;;:(L
FIRM OR TRADE NAME:----.:JW;N l:-.h.. rLe CAS.(..;~ 50 (1("\
BUSINESS ADDRESS: lC7() se\ ~:;!'.sl A\J\:'
CITY/STATE: m~I\.....'~e..4.noL'<... ()1f'J ZIP CODE: S5i.J/L{
TELEPHONE: (BUS.) ~!:il- b<-f<-3t,.,tl (HOME) b(2.-q3s-1oIb~
DATE ESTABLISHED: ) '11 t:t EMPLOYER I.D.#
SOLE PROPRIETOR X CORPORATION PARTNERSHIP
- - ~ -
MANAGEMENT
OWNERSHIP %
PROJECT LOCATION: o{Jc ChElSeA- i?cAd.
--X-NEW LOCATION
TOTAL PROJECT COST ESTIMATE: $ ?:; ~t'Cj COt'
i\1orvt'c= llo ff]r-J.
_EXISTING BUSINESS
PROPOSED USES:
REOUEST:
AMOUNT OF LOAN $ 106 , () 0 D
MA TURlTY & TER..\1S
REQUESTED
APPLICANT'S EQUITY
LOAN PURPOSE
LAND $ ~ 16tC'CC
EXISTING BUILDING
CONSTRUCTION ~ ~
MACHINERY CAPITAL . ~ D
WORKING CAPITAL
OTHER
TOTAL USES: $
PROPOSED BEGINNING DATE:
ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE:
~[,L 'Ern re12.
..2l L\ n E
ICJQ4
~ C~Cl
TITLE TO
PROJECT ASSETS TO BE HELD BY:
X OPERATING ENTITY
C,'~ ~J.&('A' nl.p(s,. f()~
(Address) / r '/_ ~
fif:f9: tc'P {- .03 c<c
(Telephone #)
ALTER EGO
PARTICIPATING LENDER: fw:,.:J
(Name)
:s AN ~ @JvAlA - 15 CLr~=; (L
(Contact P rson)
PRESENT # OF F.T. EMPLOYEES:d eLl PROJECTED # OF F.T. EMPLOYEES(witbin 2 years) ~ ~O
PROJECTED AVERAGE WAGE PER HOUR: .Sf 11,0 '='
ADDmONAL PROJE'cr INFORMATION:
qa'1'f.~
DATE SIGNED: q-lC'- C'J'1
APPLICANT SIGNATURE:
SA
.
APPROVAL OF
GREATER MONTICELLO ENTERPRISE FUNDS
BY
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
IN AND FOR THE CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA
Preliminary Loan Application Approval.
September 28. 1999
Loan terms negotiated and agreed upon between
the developer, the lending institution, and the
EDA Executive Director.
State, Developer, and EDA
Formal Loan Application and Financial Statement
analyzed by the lending institution,~ Inc. or City
staff.
Lenny Kirscht and State
Building and Site Plan Preliminary and/or Final Review.
Building Permit approval or construction commitment.
Loan documents reviewed and/or prepared by the
City Attorney.
Kennedy & Graven
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY APPROVAL OR DISAPPROV AL:
.OANNUMBER: GMEF Loan No. 017 LOAN APPROVED: Yes
BORROWER: TWIN CITY DIE CASTINGS COMPANY
ADDRESS: 1070 33 AVENUE SE, MPLS, MN 55414 DISAPPROVED:
LOAN AMOUNT: ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLOARS AND NO CENTS (Machinery and equipment)
RATE: 6.25% Fixed rate DATE: September 28, 1999
TERMS Seven Years
FEE $200 paid within five working days of Council approval. October 16, 1999.
**OTHER (SECOND PAGE)
A motion was made by EDA Commissioner Barb Schwientek
Greater Monticello Enterprise Funds in the amount of One-=-Hup.dred
($100,000.00)
to (approve -~)
Thousand Dollars and NO Cents
dollars and cents to developer
Twin City Die Castings Company
this _~_ day of September ,1999
Seconded by EDA Commissioner Darrin Lahr
YEAS:
Demeules
NAYS:
None
Schwientek
Lahr
Hoglund
Carlson
Maus
.NIEF disbursed
ABSENT:
Herbst
, ~__~_ by Check No.
EDA Treasurer
CITY COUNCIL MAY REVERSE AN EDA LOAN DECISION WITHIN TWENTY-ONE DAYS OF EDA
APPROV AL. TO CITY COUNCIL, _---
SA
GMEF Approval
Page 2
-ACCEPTANCE OF TERMS
I (We) hereby accept the terms stated above as approved by the Economic Development Authority in and for the
City of Monticello.
DA TED:
10 -~-71
** JOB GOAL:
89 NEW FULL-TIME JOBS TO THE CITY OF MONTICELLO WITHIN TWO YEARS OF
BENEFIT DATE (June 2002).
WAGE GOAL:
AT ALL TIMES, AT LEAST 90% OF THE JOBS TO PAY A RATE EQUAL TO OR GREATER
THAN 160% OF THE FEDERAL MINIMUM WAGE, EXCLUSIVE OF BENEFITS, FOR
INDIVIDUALS OVER THE AGE OF 20 DURING THE TERM OF THE ASSISTANCE.
ANNUAL WRITTEN REPORTS ARE REQUIRED UNTIL TERMINATION DATE. FAILURE TO
THE JOB AND WAGE ELVEL GOALS REQUIRE PARTICAL OR FULL REPAYMENT OF
THE ASSISTANCE WITH INTEREST.
MACHINERY AND EQUIPMENT LOAN SHARE A SECOND-POSITION BEHIND THE INDUSTRIAL REVENUE BONDS.
-
GMEF LEGAL FEES RESPONSIBILITY OF APPLICANT.
COLLATERAL:
PERSONAL/CORPORATE GUARANTEES (requires unlimited personal guarantees)
OR PER THE GMEF ATTORNEY.
APPROVAL SUBJECT TO STATE FUNDING AND BOND APPROVAL.
LOAN BECOMES NULL AND VOID MARCH 28, 1999 IF FUNDS HAVE NOT BEEN DISBURSED.
GMEF DOLLARS DISBURSED FROM UDAG AND GMEF ACCOUNTS.
MONTICELLO LOCATION ADDRESS: 520 CHELSEA ROAD, MONTICELLO, MN 55362
LEGAL TO BE KNOWN AS: LOT 1, BLOCK 1, MONTICELLO COMMERCE CENTER FOURTH ADDITION.
.
5"A
.
.
.
5B.
City Council Agenda - 10/11/99
Consideration to aoprove a Proclamation oroclaimine the week of October 25-29.
1999. City of Monticello. Minnesota Manufacturers Week. (O.K.)
A. Reference and Background:
F or the past six years, the State of Minnesota has acknowledged the manufacturers ofthe
State. Today, there is approximately 8000 manufacturers in the State. The City of
Monticello through the efforts of the Industrial Development Committee and Marketing
Committee have in the past participated through various recognitions. On a yearly basis,
these groups sponsor activities such as visit existing industries, hold a gratis breakfast and
golf outing, hold receptions and award plaques to expanding and new industries, and
recognize industries in the City Newsletter "Business Spotlight".
As oftoday including Twin City Die Castings Company, the City of Monticello has 37
industries of which 23 are true manufacturers. A couple of activities planned this year
during Manufacturers Week is a recognition ad in the local newspaper and shopper,
presentation of a Certificate from the State of Minnesota at the banquet, and recognition
at the Industrial Banquet of October 26.
Proclaiming the week of October 25-29 as Manufacturers Week is consistent with the
objectives and goals ofthe City of Monticello: To expand and retain the industrial tax and
employment base.
B. Alternative Action:
1. A motion to approve a Proclamation proclaiming the week of October 25-29,
1999, City of Monticello, Minnesota Manufacturers Week.
2. A motion to approval of a Proclamation proclaiming the week of October 25.29,
1999, City of Monticello, Minnesota Manufacturers Week.
C. Recommendation:
City Administrator recommends Alternative No.1.
D. SuoportinlZ Data:
Copy of Proclamation for approval.
1
<-", '0"\ "'1' ',~
/'"".. "\\ \'.' \.~ ...~ .~,
' ,\."b' '~I' i\
.r.,\..'\( <':". .t:(?:
c;-' . ii'
,'/;,:, :.
<e~l . ~'. V ,: \
/'". .,;~, )
, i, ""/7JJln'j~'\'v./, ,"
\ . .'./
" ,..
", ,II'. ,\.'
'.Ij, (, "
'1 ),1: /1', II ~, ~,\,
J,I \: .~ "','
hereas:
Whereas:
Whereas:
Whereas:
Whereas:
Minnesota Manufacturers Week
Manufacturing has the largest total
payroll of any business sector in Minnesota.
Providing $16 billion in 1996 wages, and
Manufacturing produces $27.1 billion for the
State economy and is the second largest single
share (18.9%) of our gross product, and
~\\OTA k"
,~ 4' d':
~ ~
c:..
c=
-
.....
-.
..
~..,.
'\~
Manufacturing exports brought nearly
$9.53 billion into the Minnesota economy
in 1997, and
Manufacturing provides high skill, high
wage jobs which significantly contribute
to Minnesota's high standard of living and
economic vitality; and
""
....
..
..
.-
.".
/~
;}, 'J
Manufacturing contributed nearly $216
million in corporate income taxes in
Minnesota, more than any other business
sector, and almost 28 percent of total
corporate income taxes in 1998;
Now Therefore, I Roger Belsaas. Mayor of the City of Monticello,
Minnesota, do hereby proclaim the week of October 25-29, to be
The City of Monticello
Minnesota Manufacturers Week
In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and
caused the Great Seal of the City of Monticello, Minnesota
to be affixed at the City Office this Eleventh day of
October, One Thousand nine hundred and ninety-nine.
Mayor
City Administrator
5[3
.
.
.
s.c.
City Council Agenda - 10/11/99
Consideration of adoption of a resolution establishing a negative declaration of
impact relating to the Groveland Subdivision Environmental Assessment
Worksheet. (JO)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
Attached you will find a report from WSB & Associates relating to the Environmental
Assessment Worksheet process. As you will note in the report, there were letters from
MnDOT, Wright County Soil Conservation District and State Historical Society with
questions relating to the development which are addressed in WSB's report. Also in the
report is a finding of fact relating to this project which supports a motion of a negative
declaration of impact.
If the City Council is comfortable that the proper action is to make this negative
declaration, an Environmental Impact Statement is not necessary. In the event Council
feels that there are significant environmental issues that have not been completely
addressed, then it may want to table action relating to this negative declaration, or deny
the negative declaration of impact. If a negative declaration of impact is not established,
it will be necessary to complete an Environmental Impact Statement before this project
can proceed.
As you may recall, the approval of the preliminary plat was subject to completion of the
EA W process and contingent upon the approval of the Wetland Mitigation Plan by
Wright County Soil Conservation District. The Wetland Mitigation Plan has not been
approved at this time, however comments on the plan have been received by WSB and
the developer has been providing information to Wright County Soil Conservation
District that will enable this agency to make its findings relative to the Wetland
Mitigation Plan. Please note that the final plat and the development agreement will not
be processed until the Wetland Mitigation Plan has been approved by Wright County Soil
Conservation District.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1.
Motion to adopt a resolution establishing a negative declaration of impact relating
to the Groveland Subdivision. Motion based on the findings outlined in the report
submitted by WSB & Associates.
2.
Motion to deny making a negative declaration of impact.
Under this alternative, City Staff and City Engineer will be doing further research
with regard to the questions posed through the Environmental Assessment
Worksheet process.
.
City COLIne i I Agenda - 10/11/99
3.
Motion to deny adoption of a resolution establishing a negative declaration of
impact and require preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement relating to
the Grovcland Subdivision.
Council should select this alternative if it feels that the environmental issues are
not completely understood and that an environmental impact statement is
necessary prior to development of the subdivision as proposed.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
If City Council is comfortable with the responses to questions posed via the EA W
process by various agencies, City Council should adopt a Negative Declaration ofImpact
based on the findings outlined in the report provided by WSB & Associates.
SUPPORTING DATA:
. Copy of reports provided by WSB & Associates
.
.
.
.
.
350 Westwood Lake Office
8441 Wayzata Boulevard
Minneapolis, MN 55426
612-541-4800
FAX 541-1700
& Associates, Inc.
October 8, 1999
Monticello City Council
PO Box 1147
Monticello, MN 55362
Re: Statement of negative need for an EIS for Groveland Development
WSB Project 1010.95
Dear Monticello City Council:
B.A. Mittelsteadt, P.E.
Bret A. Weiss, P.E.
Peter R. Willenbring. P.E.
Donald W Srerna, rE.
Ronald B. Bray, rE.
The public comment period for the Groveland Development Environmental Assessment Worksheet
(EA W) ended Wednesday, October 6, 1999. Responses to comments and Findings of Fact have
been prepared. From this process, we conclude that this project does not have the potential for
significant environmental impacts. Therefore, we recommend the City Council issue a negative
declaration of need for an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Groveland Development.
Sincerely,
S4Cj;C
Bret A. Weiss, P.E.
Y ice President
c: Jeff O'Neill, City of Monticello
Bret Weiss, WSB & Associates
JW
Minneapolis · St. Cloud
Infrastructure Engineers Planners
EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
F.. \ WPWINlI010. 95\I00699mcc. WI'''
5C
.
.
.
B.A. Mittelsteadt, P.E.
Btet A. Weiss, P.E.
Peter R. Willenbring, P.E.
Donald W. Sterna, P.E.
Ronald B. Bray, P.E.
.
WSD
I .
& Associates, Inc.
350 Westwood Lake Office
8441 Wayzata Boulevard
Minneapolis, MN 55426
612-541-4800
FAX 541-1700
October 8, 1999
Mr. Jeff O'Neill
City of Monticello
PO Box 1147
Monticello, MN 55362
Re: Environmental Assessment Worksheet for Groveland Development
WSB Project No. 1010.95
Dear Jeff:
Enclosed, please find copies of the Findings of Fact and Responses to Comments generated by the
Groveland Development EA W process. Also attached is WSB' s recommendation regarding the
negative need for an EIS.
Attached to this document is a letter from the City to John Larsen at the Environmental Quality
Board (EQB) regarding the Negative Declaration of Need for an EIS. This letter can be copied onto
City letterhead, signed, and sent to the EQB once the Council has made an official recommendation
regarding an EIS for Groveland Development.
If you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact me at 541-4800.
Sincerely,
~~7XC'
Bret A. Weiss, P .E.
Vice President
Attachments
c. Bret Weiss, WSB & Associates
amIjw
F:I WPWIMIOIO, 9.51 I0069~jo, wINI
Minneapolis · St. Cloud
Infrastructure Engineers Planners
EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
5C
.
.
.
October 12, 1999
Mr. John Larsen
Environmental Quality Board
300 Centennial Office Building
658 Cedar Street
St. Paul, MN 55155
Re: Statement of negative need for an EIS for Gold Nugget Residential Development
WSB Project 1010.95
Dear Mr. Larsen:
The public comment period for the Groveland Development Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EA W)
ended Wednesday, October 6, 1999. Responses to comments and Findings of Fact have been prepared
and are attached. From this process, we conclude that this project does not have the potential for
significant environmental affects. Therefore, the City has issued a Negative Declaration of Need for an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Groveland Development.
Sincerely,
Jeff O'Neill
Deputy Administrator
City of Monticello
am/jw
F: IWPW/NI/O/O.95\/OU699j1. wpd
5C
..
wss
350 Westwood Lake Office
8441 Wayzata Boulevard
Minneapolis, MN 55426
BA. Mittelsteadt, P.E.
Bret A. Weiss, P.E.
Peter R. Willenbring, P.E.
Donald W Sterna, P.E.
Ronald B. Bray, P.E.
.
& Associates, Inc.
612-541-4800
FAX 541-1700
Memorandum
To:
Dennis Gimmestad, Minnesota Historical Society
Mark McNamara, Wright SWCD
Claudia Dumont, MnDOT-District 3B
Bret Weiss, P.E., WSB & Associates~,ol-
Jeff O'Neill, City of Monticello
From:
Date:
October 8, 1998
Re:
Groveland Development EA W
WSB Project No. 1010.95
Enclosed, please find responses to comments received as part of the EA W process for the Groveland
Development in Monticello, MN. Comments were received from the Minnesota Historical Society,
the Wright Soil and Water Conservation District (SWCD), and from MnDOT.
. Comment
MnDOT. Traffic: Please develop a more detailed table and/or drawing to indicate the
distribution of the TH25/Chelsea Road under year 2005 and 2010 build conditions. If
warranted, the current construction on TH25 may need to allow for future dual left turn lanes
from Chelsea Road to northbound TH25. Please contact Tom Dumont, Assistant District
Traffic Engineer at (320)654-5105, with any questions.
Response. The attached figure shows the projected 2005 and 2009 PM peak hour full build
traffic volumes at the intersection of TH25 and Chelsea Road. Some of the traffic volumes
decrease from 2005 to 2009 as a result of the future extension of school Boulevard west
providing additional access to the proposed development. Based on the projected PM peak
hour volumes and the capacity and level of service analysis conducted as part of the EA W, dual
left turn lanes are not be warranted. By the year 2009, the School Boulevard extension to the
west will provide additional access to the development area west ofTH 25. Future (past 2009)
volumes will primarily split between the Chelsea Road and School Boulevard intersections.
.
Comment
Wright SWCD. In regard to the Wetland Conservation Act the plan indicates there are
numerous wetlands on the site which will be regulated by the Act. My question is, have these
wetlands been officially delineated? The reason for the questions is, I have never seen a
delineation report nor have I reviewed any staking of any of the wetlands on this development.
A delineation and replacement plan application will be required before a WCA permit can be
issued. As a member of the Local Governing Unit Technical Evaluation Panel, one question
F;\ WPWIN\I 0 I 0.95\1 00699commcnt. wpd
Minneapolis · St. Cloud
Infrastructure Engineers Planners rr
EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER ;:) "--"
.
October 8, 1999
Page 2
I know we will asking is why can't the proposed Chelsea Road be shifted to avoid wetland
impacts?
Response. The wetlands present on the Groveland site have been delineated by Kelly Bopray
at MFRA. Mr. Bopray indicated that the wetland delineation has not been reviewed by the TEP
at this time. A wetland delineation report is being prepared by MFRA and will be submitted
for agency review by the week of October 11, 1999. It is anticipated that the wetland
delineation will be reviewed at that time.
It should also be noted that Mr. Bopray indicated that approximately an additional 1800 fe of
wetland impact within the residential development was discovered after the EA W was
submitted for comment. Therefore, approximately 1.20 acres of wetland are proposed to be
impacted by this project. However, it is anticipated that through the permitting process, the
wetland impacts will be minimized to the greatest extent feasible and an acceptable mitigation
plan will be developed.
.
With regard to impacts to Chelsea Road, many different alternatives were explored for the
road's alignment. Some of these alternatives had greater impacts to the wetlands and some had
less impacts. The alternative that had the least amount of wetland impact would have
eliminated the house that is located on the north end of the project area. This was not
acceptable to the land owner. Other alternatives impacted a greater amount of wetland than
proposed. These alternatives were not chosen based on the wetland impact and safety issues.
The alternative that was chosen proposes to impact 1.16 acres of wetland. This option balances
the need to avoid the house at the north end of the property, addresses safety issues, and
minimizes wetland impacts to the greatest extent possible.
It is the intent of the City that the plat will not be approved until wetland issues are resolved
and permits are approved. A wetland replacement plan application needs to be submitted with
a sequencing discussion to address the impacts to these wetlands. This sequencing discussion
will be reviewed by the City and the TEP. As part of the wetland permitting process, the City
will ensure that wetland impacts are reduced to the greatest extent possible.
.
Comment
Wright SWCD. We are concerned that a project this large has a great potential for excessive
erosion. Timing and phasing are two important things to consider when grading this property.
As described in the EA W, this project may be phased over five to ten years. Ifprecautions are
not taken that may only increase the potential for excessive erosion. It is our recommendation
that initial grading on each phase of the project be the construction of both temporary and
permanent stormwater ponds. The permanent ponds should be designed to maintain or reduce
runoff rates using two, ten, and one hundred year storm events. Be advised maintenance must
be done to assure the ponds maintain their storage capacity when final grading and stabilization
is complete. It is our recommendation that each phase be graded to completion and stabilized
within the time frames set forth in the National Discharge and Elimination Systems Permit
requirements, with no graded areas left exposed over winter. If an areas cannot be graded to
F:I WPWINI I 0 I 0.951 I 00699comment. wpd
5C
.
.
.
October 8, 1999
Page 3
completion before winter these areas must be seeded to come temporary cover such as oats or
annual rye grass.
Finally, remember erosion control is a two part process installation and maintenance. It has
been our experience that usually some Best Management Practices are installed, however, the
maintenance phase tends to be lacking.
Response. When reviewing the final plat, the City will ensure that proper erosion control
measures are included in the design. These measures would include temporary and permanent
stormwater ponds, the use and maintenance of silt fence, and vegetating disturbed areas as soon
as possible. The City also has been aggressive with the residential home builders to make sure
that the streets are kept clean and the appropriate erosion control is maintained. The City also
does not close out the developers agreement until all ponds and wetlands are inspected for
impacts and are corrected if necessary.
Comment
Minnesota Historical Society. [The EA W] has been reviewed pursuant to responsibilities
given to the Minnesota Historical Sites Act and the Minnesota Field Archaeology Act and
through the process outlined in Minnesota Rule 4410.1600.
While the response to question 26a does reference our letter of 9 December 1998, it fails to
discuss the effects of the project on the cemetery that we cited in that letter.
Please note that this comment letter does not address the requirements of Section 106 of the
National Historic Preservation Act of 1996 and 36CFR800...Ifthis project is considered for
federal assistance, or requires a federal permit or license, it should be submitted to our office
with reference to the assisting federal agency.
Response
The cemetery referenced in the above comment and in the December 9th letter is St. Henry's
Cemetery. The cemetery is located northwest of 90th Street and not within the Groveland
Development. The Groveland Development will not impact the cemetery.
This concludes the responses to comments generated by the Groveland Development EA W. If you
have questions, please contact me at (612)541-4800.
c.
Tony Emmerich, Ocello, LLC.
Mike Gair, MFRA
Kelly Bopray, MFRA
Project File 1010.95
F:\ WPWINlI 0 I 0.95\1 00699comment.wpd
5G
.
.
.
CITY OF MONTICELLO
In the matter of the Decision on the
Need for an Environmental Impact
Statement (ElS) for the Proposed
Groveland Development, Monticello,
MN.
FINDINGS OF FACT
AND CONCLUSIONS
Ocello, LLC has proposed to construct a residential development with some commercial areas on 272
acres ofland west of Trunk Highway 25 (TH25) and south of future Chelsea Road. Pursuant to Minn. R.
4410.4300, subp. 19D, the City of Monticello has prepared an Environmental Assessment Worksheet
(EA W) for this proposed project. As to the need for an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) on the
project and based on the record in this matter, including the EA Wand comments received, the City of
Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions:
FINDINGS OF FACT
I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
A.
Project
The project proposes the construction of a residential development with some commercial
uses on 272 acres of land. This project involves the construction of33 8 unattached units
and 24 acres of commercial property. The site would also contain approximately 35 acres
of wetland, and 8 acres of wooded area.
B.
Project Site
The proposed project is within a 272 acre area immediately west of Trunk Highway 25
(TH25) and south offuture Chelsea Road. The project is located within the NE1/4 of
Section 15, NWl/4 of Section 14, SEl/4 of Section 10, and the SEl/4 of Section 15,
T 121 N, R25W. This site has been cropped in the past and contains 35 acres of wetland.
II. PROJECT HISTORY
A. The project was subject to the mandatory preparation of a EA W under Minnesota R.
4410.4300, subp. 19D.
B.
An EA W was prepared on the proposed project and distributed to the Environmental
Quality Board (EQB) mailing list and other interested parties on August 25, 1999.
F:\WPWINI/OIO.95\FOF. wpd
5G
.
.
.
C.
A press release containing the notice of availability ofthe EA W for public review was
provided to media serving the project area on August 25, 1999.
D. The EA W was noticed in the September 6, 1999 EQB Monitor. The public comment
period ended on October 6, 1999. Comment letters were received from the Minnesota
Historical Society, the Minnesota Department of Transportation, and the Wright County
Soil and Water Conservation District. Copies of the letters are hereby incorporated by
reference. Responses to the comments are also incorporated by reference.
III. CRITERIA FOR DETERMINING THE POTENTIAL FOR SIGNIFICANT
ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS
Minnesota R.441 0.1700, subp. 1 states that "an EIS shall be ordered for projects that have the
potential for significant environmental effects." In deciding whether a project has the potential for
significant environmental effects, the City of Monticello must consider the four factors set out in
Minnesota R.441 0.1700, subp. 7. With respect to each ofthese factors, the City finds as follows:
A.
TYPE, EXTENT, AND REVERSIBILITY OF ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS
The first factor that the City of Monticello must consider is "type, extent and reversibility
of environmental effects," Minnesota R.441 0.1700, subp. 7.A. The City of Monticello
findings with respect to each of these issues are set forth below.
1. The type of environmental impacts anticipated as part ofthis project include: a.an
increased storm water runoff volume and runoff pollutants
b. increased water use
c. increased wastewater discharge
d. increased noise due to traffic within the area
e. impacts due to the potential road connections to TH25
f. wetland impacts from road and residential filling
These impacts will be minimized and mitigated through the permitting and plan
approval processes.
2. The extent and reversibility of environmental impacts are consistent with those of
commercial development.
B.
CUMULATIVE POTENTIAL EFFECTS OF RELATED OR ANTICIPATED
FUTURE PROJECTS
The second factor that the City of Monticello must consider is ''the cumulative potential
effects of related or anticipated future projects", Minnesota R.441 0.1700. supb. 7.B. The
City's findings with respect to this factor are set forth below.
F:\WPWINlJOJO.95\FOF.wpd 5 C.-
.
1.
The construction of the Groveland Development will be in phases. The first phase
will include the extension of Chelsea Road which will serve the northern portion
of the site. Phase 1 will also include the development of20-40 acres of single
family residential area. Phase 1 is proposed to begin in late 1999 with grading
completed by 2000. The remaining phases will include constructing approximately
50-7 Slots per year. The commercial development at the northern portion of the
site is not anticipated to develop for 5-1 0+ years. Erosion and sedimentation was
a concern brought forth by the Wright County Soil and Water Conservation
District. The use of Best Management Practices will be implemented and
maintained throughout all phases of this project to ensure the effects of erosion and
sedimentation are mitigated. The impacts associated with these phases have been
adequately addressed by the EA W process.
C. THE EXTENT TO WHICH ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS ARE SUBJECT TO
MITIGATION BY ONGOING PUBLIC REGULATORY AUTHORITY
1. The following permits or approvals will be required for the project:
Unit of Government Permit or Approval Required
Federal:
. US Corps of Engineers -+ Wetland Impact
State:
DNR -+ Dewatering permit
DNR -+ Impact to DNR Waters/Wetlands
MPCA -+ NPDES Permit; General
Stormwater Permit
MPCA -+ Permit Fee for Sewer Extension
MN Dept. of Health -+ Water Extension System
Local:
City of Monticello -+ Grading and platting plan
City of Monticello -+ Building Permit
LGU - Monticello/SWCD -+ Wetland Impact
. 2. The City of Monticello finds that the potential environmental affects of the project
are subject to mitigation by ongoing regulatory authorities such that an EIS need
not be prepared.
F: \ WPWINl 1010. 95\FOF. wpd SG
.
.
.
D.
THE EXTENT TO WHICH ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS CAN BE
ANTICIP A TED AND CONTROLLED AS A RESUL T OF OTHER
ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES UNDERTAKEN BY PUBLIC AGENCIES OR THE
PROJECT PROPOSER, OR OF EISs PREVIOUSLY PREPARED ON SIMILAR
PROJECTS.
The fourth factor that the City of Monticello must consider is "the extent to which
environmental effects can be anticipated and controlled as a result of other environmental
studies undertaken by public agencies or the project proposer, or ofEISs previously
prepared on similar projects," MinnesotaR.4700.1700, subp. 7.D. The City's findings
with respect to this factor are set forth below:
The environmental impacts of the proposed project have been addressed in the following
plans prepared by the City:
1. City of Monticello Comprehensive Plan
2. City of Monticello Comprehensive Water Resource Management Plan
(draft)
3. City of Monticello Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan
4. City of Monticello Transportation Plan
The City finds that the environmental effects of the project can be anticipated and
controlled as a result of the environmental review, planning, and permitting processes.
CONCLUSIONS
1. The EA W, the permitting process, and comments received on the EA W have generated
information adequate to determine whether the proposed facility has the potential for significant
environmental effects.
2. Areas where the potential for significant environmental effects may have existed have been
identified and appropriate mitigative measures have been incorporated into the project design and
permits. The Groveland Development is expected to comply with all the City of Monticello
standards and review agency standards.
3. Based on the criteria established in Minnesota R.441 0.1700, the project does not have the
potential for significant environmental effects.
4. An Environmental Impact Statement is not required.
5.
Any fmdings that might properly be termed conclusions and any conclusions that might properly
be termed findings are hereby adopted as such by the Monticello City Council.
F;IWPWINI\ 0 \ O.95\FOF.wpd
5G
1999 No / Build - 5450
1999 Build - 6300
2005 No / Build - 6507
2005 Full Build - 9858
2009 No / Build - 7324
2009 Full Build - 10,306
1~44%
.Jf ~ '~,
@128S)
~ 1"4) 281
~ 92) if
33%
2005 Build- 1575
Legend
@ Lane Configuration
XXX 2005 FULL BUILD
(XXX) 2009 FULL BUILD
" ,>, " " "
ADT - Average Daily Traffic
...
WSB
350 Westwood Lake omce
8441 Wsyzala Boulll\lsrd
Minneapolis, MN 55426
EAW
612.s.41~
&.A.ssocialU, Inc. FAX &41&1700
INFRASTRUCTURE . ENGINEERS . PLANNERS
Lyman - Emmerich Devlopment
j; \ 1010.95\cad\ fig-O' ,d~n
I
7th
~
1998 Exist . 12,265
1999 No / Build - 12,548
1999 Build - 12,755
- 2005 No / Build. 14,382
2005 Full Build - 16,470
2009 No / Build - 15,750
2009 Full Build - 17,498
WSB ProjedNo. 1010,95
Date: December 9, 1998
Site Traffic Distribution
Existing & Proposed ADT
5~
.
.
.
City Council Agenda - 10/11/99
5.E. Consideration of a reauest for a Conditional Use Permit to allow three or morc
business si1!ns on a commercial building at 106 & 106'l'Z West Broadway.
Applicant: Gregory W. Dunn. DDS. (FP)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
The Planning Commission has recommended that a conditional use permit be issued to
allow the erection of a 4' x 6' internally illuminated business identification wall sign on
the east wall of the building located at 106 & 106 1;2 West Broadway. The business signs
are needed to advertise three separate businesses from the same building.
In the CCO district, a conditional use permit is required for signs where there are three or
more business uses in one building. The total allowable sign area allowable for the
building will not be exceeded and the sign is consistent in design with other signs erected
on the East Broadway side of the building.
The sign plan for the building has been reviewed and found to be in compliance with the
required conditions for the conditional use permit.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1.
MOTION TO APPROVE THE ISSUANCE OF A CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT FOR THE ERECTION OF THIS 4' X 6' SIGN AT 106 AND 106 1;2
WEST BROADWAY, AS REQUESTED BY THE APPLICANT, SUBJECT TO
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
1. All signs for tenants shall be consistent in design, material, shape,
and method of illumination; and,
2. Prior to making any alteration of signs, sign location, sign size, or
number of signs, the building owner shall submit an application
and revised sign plan to the City, and receive an amendment to this
conditional use permit.
3. There shall be no other sign other than directional and address
placed on the South wall.
4. Prior to installation, the sign will be approved by City Building
Official.
2.
MOTION TO DENY THE ISSUANCE OF THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
FOR (reasons to be determined by City Council).
.
City Council Agenda - 10/11/99
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends Alternative 1. for the issuance of a conditional use permit for 106 &
106 12 West Broadway to allow signs to be erected as illustrated by the sign plan
submitted by the applicant, and subject to the conditions required by ordinance and
provided in the motion above.
Attachments:
. Copy of Applicable Ordinance Section: 3-9 [E] 3.
. Copy of Sign Plan for 106 & 10612 West Broadway as submitted
by applicant.
.
.
(a) In the case ofa building where there are three (3) or more business
uses, but which, by generally understood and accepted definitions,
is not considered a shopping center or shopping mall, a conditional
use shall be granted to the entire building in accordance with an
overall site plan under the provisions of Option A or Option B
. (described in 2 (b) i and ii above) provided that:
1. The owner of the building files with the Zoning
Administrator a detailed plan for signing illustrating
location, size in square feet, size in percent of gross
silhouette area, and to which business said sign is
dedicated.
11. No tenant shall be allowed more than one sign, except that
in the case of a building that is situated in the interior of a
block and having another building on each side of it, one
sign shall be allowed on the front and one sign shall be
allowed on the rear provided that the total square footage
of the two signs does not exceed the maximum allowable
square footage under Option A or Option B described in
2(b)i and ii above.
iii. No individual business sign board/placard shall exceed
twenty-five percent (25%) of the total allowable sign area.
IV. An owner of the building desiring any alteration of signs,
. sign location, sign size, or number of signs shall first
submit an application to the Zoning Administrator for an
amended sign plan, said application to be reviewed and
acted upon by the Zoning Administrator within ten (10)
days of application. If the application is denied by the
Zoning Administrator, the applicant may go before the
Planning Commission at their next regularly scheduled
meeting.
v. In the event that one tenant of the building does not utilize
the full allotment of allowable area, the excess may not be
granted, traded, sold, or in any other way transferred to
another tenant for the purpose of allowing a sign larger
than twenty-five percent (25%) of the total allowable area
for signs.
VI. Any building identification sign or building directory sign
shall be included in the total allowable area for signs.
vii. Any sign that is shared by or is a combination of two or
more tenants shall be considered as separate signs for
. square footage allowance and shall meet the requirements
thereof.
Vlll. All signs shall be consistent in design, material, shape,
MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE and method of illumination.
5E
~ OCT-04-99 02:25 PM
-X
- .
.1
.
I
.
I '
;
DR. GREG DUNN. DDS
6126S2506Sl
~~~~='!J!~:~::~\1{~(::~~t%'i~~~~~~~~;~~'f;;!~.:..;s~ila~fl,t:~.~~J~,~;'.;';:=F!~=If~
'02 Many CrtYe Phone(812)8B2.21ot
!Jutrllo, Mln,.ota S5313 11-.(812)6&2-5069
. E-Mlil BrbSmIfIBrteOAOL.caft
~'
DR. a,REG DUNN, DDS
Family Dentistry & Orthodontics
"Msk;ng ~miles Msgic"
295.2905
'.ntranc. In r..r of 8ulldlnal
6"
/l"1-1);.' ~.e(.
P.01
51::
.
.
.
City Council Agenda -10111/99
5.F. Consideration of a request for a Conditional Use Permit within the 1-1 Zoning District
to allow Outdoor Storage of Equioment and Materials. Applicant: Mainline
Distribution Properties. (JO)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
Steve Groebner, on behalf of Mainline Distribution, has requested a Conditional Use Permit
to use a portion of the property for accessory outdoor storage. The property is currently
developed with an existing building and a paved and curbed parking/driveway area. 'rhe
proposed outdoor storage will be located on a Class 5 gravel pad to the east of the building.
The applicant proposed to fence in the pad with a chain link fence, using slats in the fence
to screen the storage area.
As a developed site, there are few issues relating to the current or proposed use of the
property. The specific conditions of the Zoning District relating to outdoor storage appear
to be met, including screening and setbacks. The site would be subject to bufferyard
requirements, however. The bufferyard ordinance requires that existing development is
subject to the bufferyard improvements at the time of expansion or alteration. The addition
of the storage area would qualify as an expansion of the activity on the site.
BufTeryard requirements for an industrial use adjacent to an institutional use (elementary
school) are one half of the planting requirements, defined as 120 plant units per 100 feet of
shared property line. The property line appears to be approximately 420 feet in length,
resulting in a bufferyard plant requirement of 504 plant units, 252 of which are required by
this applicant. The applicant shows an existing tree line consisting of II evergreen and 10
deciduous trees, a total of 255 plant units. Therefore, the existing bufferyard is in
compliance with the ordinance.
The Planning Commission reviewed the request and recommended approval per alternative
1 below.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS
1. Motion to recommend approval of the Conditional Use Permit for outdoor storage
for Mainline Distribution, based on a finding that the proposed CUP complies with
all of the standards for outdoor storage in the 1-1, Light Industrial District.
2. Motion to recommend denial of the CUP, based on findings to be made following the
public hearing.
3.
Motion to table action on the CUP, subject to additional information.
.
City COLIne i I Agenda -10111/99
c.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
StalT recommends approval of the Mainline Distribution outdoor storage CUP. The
application appears to bc in full compliance with the City's zoning regulations for this use
and this location.
D. SUPPORTING DATA
Exhibit A - Site Location
Exhibit B - Site Plan
Exhibit Z - CUP Requirements
.
.
/J\ : \ :.:' ./ C~'~'~("~'~:'!!' ,.:'..../>~~.~';!/ .~~,/</.'<: .:../' /,>" ,.'<t(44:/,'>"', _~,
.J , .." Y , . .' >';"~, '. . i " ~.'.. ,... ' . .': .. I' ~ .....--..:!... ...[. ,
~-- ' . );\ ., ""j ~. t.,' I , '. . , ',>" ',', 'I ' , .
-~ ... .t............~.~ I,' I, l, /.' / ,,~. ~',., , "VI '. ',',' ,f ',/" 11.. l.' I Jf:- ...'of....)-...... ~....~ I 'f...
~-'- '<' ( .. ,,' '- ~, ~.....! ' .' ' ;); .' '. ..', .. " ,'~, ", ) ")-."'" ,
---, : i ,,,-~,.. I ;".< i:'I/~ '~'" ",'. . JI(\., " I... ,', : .,'.: '...... "L.-C:. (', .
I. ... -....~ ...' It., .............. I '~,. . 1 .... _ ~1.. , \.
' I I , '/ ", ~" ,.~. ,-' ,,_t_' _____'n.~-n .. "'",:
: i 1 i .: tf., S-"';;::'-<~J ~,:' ',' , :,' ".-/~ '--'. ~. ", ' '. " \ _~
.~ i ! i / :' ;,','. rlJ~/"''.;......" <~, I 11 :-'---.,~:.,'.,CQ~---.-_____ /f Ca".. -" <'~"r. j...
. J! .. ,,~ f '" -,...... / / 'I' ':0' l:D-- -'- . ~ " ", ()
, ,!.:':;,::, I ' ~,.~~ ....~.,.... / ! 0\ \.... -fjilfj--__ ~----__ "__ /i q... ;-.". '~.. ""<'
I ; f ,. " , .........~. ( '. y. ~ v'll. IN---------- ------..__ r ,'-, ".
..-.'-----L. ! / i:'.''': / . . \ ) ) ~ o/' r- G r Cif..(\ --'--.........,. "'-,
--~ J ! , !.', , \ V )-'0(( I \ ',_, ' ',',
-'-J.:_~:'/ /./ I ....' --\,/ '-. ; \ M'Q' 'tJ "-"""
--""'i. / : . -. (' Z ----z!._.!./ r. '-....,
,--,.~~ --<---------. ,/': \ -3--"~C'
: : ~(/)"A. ~ -~ ./ . -_ --'~__.~ / ..' ..' '. j' -.J
: ,u.' :'___ ~-'._.' . <(
. i <I'r-to" INO. 9 ------_ ~~~" LL
'{i~l-r--l i 1 '-_______ ~'"
: I J :x: I ~ l : , '"-______... ~
. 'I I I , ___
' --'-- _~....n-___o-"_'__"--'------~--":' -----......... ~.............
I THO~AS ~ 1 '-"":---..~, '~'"
~ i : 0 ) ~'-- ............
1'-rT-~ ---- ~__m '-../~ "~~
L i i ......... i. '- '..........
~.~':---'~ ' . ' ",~ -.....-....,
FHELS1EA l RQiAD' : I ~~ I;'> ~"~',
I I I -", ' 'II 14"
i \ i ! ,.." :: \ \' ciitt::-::,.... s i4};,.,
: I I i.' I \ ' St.A"'~:'~ ~ ~,
; I ," i I "'f.
" .--- --...'.:: ! '---~~~.....--- ~~~- ~_... . ..~-..............,
, ..J << ~ ._1. --.. ~~~_r"'" I '-
.... .. m\_ -- -- - r-'-' -. 6/;i Il -...........'-==:'-,~.,.
: j i^ ,.......i.\ I ....... _
I i r .~\ (m) _____, ~~<~:::>_
.! !-~' Ln., I I ~04D--:
!\ROA~ 0\: i~=\ SiTe
i'i. .' Ir
i ' \ \ ! " :i j
~ 'I i : : i
' I
'1 . ,..,l...._l__-..... l....... ..1.__... ........_...m__.___...___~,___~.....__."ln..u___..
I ~"'?- lEAD !!Iill'.E" ...,~ ~r-~? ~~~) I
I r ~---/-nil ~i n-i. ;--'-", '-'~""?b/ ( . ^~ .' 'l' I 1
.-- ... I ~ I I I .. ~ ~ \ '''; . , ~ \,)\'" ~J. ~ ~ ~.. I
I ::...// !-~j d -~:. ~T.R~<.~~ ...~,?)\~"\Q,\'i~- f~- I
l._-:J Ie, CY":-\~' '\'~" \~}'-r -~''''J L"";. I
\.).':. h-""'-< "~. ,./' .' ......... /_.. In... t-'
0: !! ....(,'t"/-s::.., ...,(<\~\. "..!' ~~-'!
,\I_,I.,l... ~v. \.AO . . -0.,., ....- ... ,u 1/
/z/ I HP~$/( '~-~.\ . '~\' .._,~_l--,)~ :
!"?J (-11;-( :"'1()1O~.\-' ',?' ':'Rt~.. . i . ::.:: w. SCH.-P.QL
[u l U.l .-'___L I.... ...:..:.~_J l__~_~.1 .: I : __ u ------;z..- ._._n_____n~'...~_
I --==~;::::\\:~OO~~}\',~==~~===I r-.M~if:~~IvE t-,~ [aIn1~;AVE
/ '.' _v'" ". \ORTve:ll i.:; '. \ .' I ! . [[ i I i l _ ) ). .,ZU. . \--. - ,- ,0--:--.:.--1.....'.-. f-
A..- ,- /\,-~.;., i", '. . I ..j-.~--j-,... t '-<'(")' _ ) . I I ,.
..- ./ /~ ~ '-.'-......1.....- .. ~-: '. ..\ \ ' I _n. . I, I ....- ....... ';.l I 'L' ' . .
\.~ (' /, . "y\\ . \'" d.H( YENNE '\. .. . L-=--=____=.-:~_.-.~:. ::~~=:.:...=-=~,' >- ;..~J L..::j~. . -. / s.' TAR i1 NG .
':~\ ~\rl ""~~~\ \~ 0' r",.!COUR,T ~l.y lJ~~~~~~: ~,/ '~':~-::Ci:TrORTvt:;:'~i'~~:=~z:'-:"
.~ ~ ';:;--- '\ a: 'f ~II i .;...,' . Ii l'r' "", ,.-~1:, Li...l..j.;~Ll\qq, .
... . . I "I' V r , ~ _"'J I _ n . \ \
'. \~ 'I --z . l >- " '. ,/ I ~ . , 'I . ,
,\ ~'-''-, 'n. -~lJJ " '..'<.I. ~
;. ,u.. ;"" ' 'a: > I - - f"'- . ~ I
. .'! r ',' //:~~ .-~~~ ~___ (~:' ~.
( '> I ;' I I T i, kif ,y-' - n I lY' , 1
r.:
"~~:"'.4J.Ji
Exhibit A - Site Locatio
...
3;
t-,I'
~
J
r
~- ,.0
~;}I"?
:z :r.' J;/.
- a..(.:Jo.
I- \f\ .
'1:'4.
J5
\
., !
"
en
oc
::J
\J-:;\
~~
~~~
~3
t-'
"'~ "
;:<'3
ill
e
~
~
\}
b~
~\:1
~
IJ ._____
~.
it
'-=-'
!ilQ
1(\'1)
'"' t<'\ '
V\~
. ,
"''''
~~
cj
ii];,
i!
od 0:( -
ffi~~
ffi~E
~~~
,
:.)
- Q73lj ":"1,,'Y(U 7n:JI:Y~{I fV3dO--
~t
r---~---------1
I ~ ~ I
, ta '
': Bl/!~U' I
I ,~~ ~ I
I ~Ii:~ I
~1l1.1l
~ I ~ ' tio I
I @ I
I
i
I
.LWNdSY ~MLr;t>/;;
I
, '--------.
~-
(
..--.
....
\1-
3 ~ \...
0-0
:fP
~
, I '6
.;~J 8
- (;)..
<r
. w
\.f,.,.::r
-;r. -- t>/
_2W
J- ~ :::0-
tCl"O
w~
I
--!l
z
9
:s
. l':C'
\S
Z
;~
ix
tU
I
~
N
--'
ill
\;3
QJ
','
" ~
, <' (:': /1i\',
l ' . (c:1'\
I :, 'L[)
'.:..::~ttl)N<<~..:.;.,-f'-;>:::f~llXiY_7 ,~ "'~:'" ::'::-:-;-::--:"_~ c
~ :Ki
,
I- I
(: I
j*
(
I
~u_._
i
?i
dtJ~
Z~cL.
r::o...r:f
V' -c'-
)(<{
(LI
~...:.........-
...
;e
,
~ t i -~~j , ~
.. _I ;j 8!. I i '~ ~
-~w \J"" I""~ ~4.<:i
. 0,)( '~........ ii:: 2-~
. uJ.Q I ~ l"t~~
cJfuJ,., ::I: 'CO I ,..r, ll.i,
~ I "'I' ...... I.J
C! 2: Q. ,: ~,' ~
Vb:": Il... f;:~~
~5 ~g; I . ~~lt
~ 9 ~ ~ i R': "-~__'___'h .--.-~--. \
II 0 U : tr
~~ ~ ~; ~ I ' -
~ ~ ~ 1- VI: , ,(P-'M .:JIII l/(J'
{::> \J 1
~~ ;1g~ m."~~ . .ur---
~; ~~I.i ~I ~(jJ 'l :
;It ~~ \1J81~.h ~".'..J~ . !
ill " r~ ..... I ,
~ ~ <E] '!':~!: ~ ~ .
, I:t"to.t-:-M
I' ,::t
:((1'
I,: . I
~'I ~.~ ~ b~",,:
':::i ::-.. ~
~ 1".:\ ~~
~~:::';(j -..J
~ . :'t
~'" ~ ~ .,,-
.w' ~-.. fr
~~tJ. ~'?i ,
;f~ ~ ~ I
Q ~~ ~.~ il
~ ~ .... I-u '>-.. ~
\ ::.....i ,~~."{:.... I I
..g}~b.~:sa,~ I. ,I
~~ ~ ~ :::'~.: \
~~ ~~J r~';~ !
~ ~ ~'~ h ~ ~
~ I,j ~ ~ ~', ~ \l: ~
~~t(j~~l\~ "-
Ij ~. . '.' ~ \J ~
~ ~ ~ ~'\ c;.
Qr~~st~~
~~ ~ ~ ~ 'lrt-:
~; ~ ~ ~ :) ,Q' ~
~Q ~ !u ~ ~ ~t,1
1'\- J I I
Q)
'B/I~ /v077f!:::t --~
~
ft
8JI
-t-
n
W ii!
~ ~ f~
1 ",M
I IdQ
~l
-0--
(8
~'jf.
--
'0
....
-
IIJ
7-
...J
W
ill
~
~l Q
z
F
':t
X'
W
-$
I
~
4::
v
j::;
...,
"
~
""
"
8
~
~
,'t
~
~'
I.ij
I
I
-.-
Exhibit B - Site Pia
.
.
.
[Al
City Council ^gcnda -10/ II /99
CONDITIONAL USES IN AN I-I DISTRICT
Open and outdoor storage as an accessory use provided that:
1. Thc area is lEmced and screened from vicw of neighboring residential uses or, if
abutting a residential district, in compliance with Chapter 3, Section 2 [Gl, of this
ordinance.
2. Storage area is grassed or surfaced to control dust.
3. Storage is screened from view trom thc public right-of~way in compliance with
Chapter 3, Section 2 [OJ, of this ordinance.
4. All lighting shall be hooded and so directed that the light source shall not be visible
from the public right-of-way or from neighboring residences and shall be in
compliance with Chapter 3, Section 2 [H], of this ordinance.
5. The provisions of Chapter 22 of this ordinance arc considered and satisfactorily met.
Exhibit Z
.
.
.
5.G. Consideration of approval of applicants who currently hold retail on.sale liauor
licenses to become liauor providers at the Monticello Community Center for
calendar year 2000. (K.B.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
At the September 27, 1999 City Council meeting, our liquor ordinance was amended that allows
intoxicating liquor being served for events at the community center. At this time the provision for
authorizing was also established as an application process and authorization done annually. After
this ordinance was approved, letters were sent to holders of retail on-sale liquor licenses in
Monticello and adjacent communities to apply for authorization. Seven (7) businesses are
requesting authorization, they are:
Russell's Of Course, Inc - Russell Vetsch
25 Central Ave, St Michael
Days Inn - Arlo Johnson
200 E. Oakwood, Monticello
Monte Club, Inc - William and Natalie Hoffman
8932 Fenning Ave NE, Monticello
Chin Yuen Silver Fox Inn - Onn Khauv
1114 Cedar St, Monticello
American Legion Post #260 - Tim Genung
304 Elm St, Monticello
Becker's Blue Herron. Scott Pauly
14000 Clubhouse Lane, Becker
Nature's Hideaway. Jason Hines
21431 - 141s1 Ave. N, Rogers
I have verified, with the State, that each of these businesses hold a current retail on-sale liquor
license. They are also required, and have complied, to name the City of Monticello on their
liability insurance. All ofthis information will be kept on file in the Community Center
administrative files.
I spoke with the State about Nature's Hideaway not being immediately adjacent to the City of
Monticello. Al Erickson at the State told me that as long as the City Council approves them for
authorization, it would be okay with the State. Rogers is considered a neighboring community to
Monticello.
The American Legion #260 does hold a Club License. The State does recognize their license for
this special provision use, however they would be eligible for their members only.
.
.
.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
I. The first alternative would be to approve the seven (7) businesses requesting authorization
to become liquor providers at the Monticello Community Center for calendar year 2000.
2. The second alternative would be to not approve the seven (7) businesses with a
recommendation to City staff as to how to proceed.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The City Administrator, after reviewing the applications, would recommend that the list of seven
(7) businesses requesting authorization be approved for the calendar year 2000.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
A copy of Monticello's Liquor Ordinance allowing this authorization.
(D)
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Council may, upon proper
application as stipulated in 3-4-2, issue a permit for the display and consumption
of intoxicating liquor and the serving of any liquid for the purpose of mixing with
intoxicating liquor for a period of one day. No more than five such permits may
be issued in a single year. No more than two such permits shall be issued to the
same organization or an affiliate in a single year. The fee for such permit shall be
set from time to time by the Counc'il but shall not exceed $25.00. All permits
issued under this provision shall be approved by the Minnesota Department of
Public Safety. The permit issued pursuant to this section shall be valid only for
the day indicated on it.
(#116, 6/28/82)
(E) Applicants receiving authorization under Section 3-4.4 to be a Liquor
Provider at the community center shall pay a fee to the City as set by
Council resolution. (#332, 9/13/99)
.
3-4-4 SPECIAL PROVISIONS; SPORTS, CONVENTIONS OR CULTURAL
FACILITIES, COMMUNITY FESTIVALS.
(A)
.
The City may authorize the holder of a retail on-sale intoxicating liquor
license issued by the City or by an adjacent municipality to dispense
intoxicating liquor at any convention, banquet, conference, meeting or
social affair conducted in the Community Center. The licensee (Liquor
Provider) must be engaged to dispense intoxicating liquor at the event held
by a person or organization permitted to use the premises and may
dispense intoxicating liquor only to any person attending the event. The
licensee may not dispense intoxicating liquor to any person attending or
participating in an amateur athletic event held on the premise.
(B) Community Center Liquor Provider Authorization: Authority to be a
Liquor Provider will be granted by the City Council on an annual basis, term to
run January 1 to December 31. The Community Center Director will accept
applications, screen and make the formal request for authorization to the City
Council. Applications for authorization to become a Liquor Provider will be
accepted throughout the year, but will require a six to eight week waiting period
for approval. If approved, the term will expire at the end of the calendar year,
December 31.
(C)
.
Tennination of Liquor Provider Authorization: The City Administrator
may suspend or terminate the license of a Liquor Provider for conducting
illegal operations, for maintaining insufficient insurance coverage, for loss or
suspension of its retail liquor license, and for violating the policies set forth in
the Monticello Community Center policy manual. The Liquor Provider may
appeal any such suspension or termination to the City Council within ten days
after receipt of notice of suspension termination. Such appeal shall be served
on the City Administrator and the Council shall commence a hearing within
21 days after receipt of the notice of appeal.
(#332,9/13/99)
MONTICELLO CITY ORDINANCE
TITLE IIl/Chpt 4/Page 2
5G
.
.
.
City Council Agenda - 10/11/99
5. H. Consideration of approval of Preliminary Plat of "Monticello Commerce Center Fourth
Addition". Applicant: Monticello Industrial Park Inc.. Pfeffer Co. Inc. (JO)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
The City Council is requested to review and consider approval of the preliminary plat of
Monticello Commerce Center Fourth Addition. This plat is located directly north ofthe new high
school property in the I-IA zoning district. The plat consists of 6.38 acres which is being
separated from approximately 70 acres of land owned by Monticello Industrial Park Inc. This
plat is being established in conjunction with a development of the Twin City Die Castings
facility. Twin City Die Castings will be developing a facility that produces machine parts from
magnesium. 'fhe first phase of the facility will contain 36,000 sq. ft. of usable space. The
property area is intended to house a future expansion which all together will result in an 80,000
sq. ft. facility. No outside storage is planned.
The 6 acre plat is tucked into the far southeasterly corner of the property owned by Monticello
Industrial Park Inc. The private service drive providing Chelsea Rd access to the high school
wraps around the southeast corner of the site. Please note that according to the buffer yard
ordinance, the site plan for the development will need to include construction of a buffer yard to
the south and east.
The site is serviced by Chelsea Road on the north. Water and sewer service is available, therefore
no public improvements are necessary. There may need to be an extension of a watermain
internal to the site to provide additional fire protection. This extension will be done in
conjunction with development of the facility.
Detailed grading, parking or utility plans were not provided in conjunction with the development
of the plat. This is because this is a single lot plat that will be developed simultaneously to
development of the facility. Plan review for grading and utilities will occur in conjunction with
the site plan development process. Since this site is zoned 1-1, the Planning Commission will not
review the site plan unless there is a need for a variance. Planning Commission reviewed the plat
and recommend approval by the City Council.
B.
AL TERNATIVE ACTIONS
1.
Motion to approve Monticello Commerce Center Fourth Addition preliminary plat.
Motion based on the finding that development of the industrial plat at this location is
consistent with the comprehensive plan and zoning ordinance.
2.
Motion to deny approval of the preliminary plat.
c.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat as submitted.
D.
SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of preliminary plat
1 :d_
---~'J i -- -jl---- ~-- c_
~~~!~f
; III i ~
15 ;il
If:f~:
~;Hjj
f. ~In!d
rOij!li
I ~j'j'l I
.... 15lf -111
~ 111-
!! lillS
! & U {Ii
; - J ~ '0'&
lit; j IJ
! III I '0 ..
:1. 'Ii!
.:sl...l'll
~il~.J.,1
I
~
~
..t)
151!o:1
t-t)
<Cl::
~~
_ j8:
g3:
ll. ~.
t)~
&::;
::Z:~
0'-
::IiI!'
;-
i i ~ ..
~ J -
ll!~ .! i J il~
:el . .. I 1I
...b ,.~j J,
...... :5 'i llj
7~ j j!ft: IlllJ
j~ 11: ;iJ~ !!.I ~ii
~:ll jji !.:l~i~ i 1 ItZ.
" r 1 Js u~t~ :.1 j j"'iJ
~ fG2G....
J; f JbJ ~HI~ ; i ~ U
o
~
?i
0(
~
1Il~:
~~
~~J
9ii~ ..,
l7i ~:
~IP""
o<i'
-1-1...:_
ilU~
!.I~!
'!~~ri
illl~h
I':ie;
Jd510
i
d~; .
--- ;& Ii .. Ii;
llil!
". "j,
~
Ii II
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
..
Z-II llNINOZ
ZKIlIl .... 'O,'B:lU~
'.IS NOUlNtiSYII\ Zot
ZIIII 'ON .I:l11l1S1O lOOtOS .INlClN3dllaNl
'1I3NNoO
~
,Ij
"1
,- ,
'Lt9-. -.
~
Q
.
.
.
Council Agenda-October I ], 1999
7.
Presentation bv Heidi Peper. the new Executive Director ofthe Wri!!ht County Economic
Development Partnership on the Partnership's Two Year Work Plan. (RW)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
'('he Economic Development Partnership of Wright County recently hired a new Executive Director, Ms.
Heidi Peper. Ms. Peper took over her duties for the partnership in July.
As you are aware, the City of Monticello has been a member of the Wright County Economic
Development Partnership for a number of years and contributes annual dues of $1,004.50 with the
Chamber/IDC also contributing an additional $500 on behalf of the City.
Ms. Peper has asked to briefly review with the Council the goals and objectives of the Economic
Partnership and introduce herself as the new Executive Director. Attached is a copy of the recently
adopted Partnership's two year plan that Ms. Peper will brief1y review.
No specific action is requested at this time.
B. SUPPORTING DATA:
A copy of Partnership's Two Year Plan.
~
.
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIP OF WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA
A NON. PRom PRIVATElPUBlIC PARTNERSHIP
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
September 7, 1999
TO:
Economic Development Partnership of Wright County Members
Heidi Peper, Executive DirectorI\W
FROM:
RE:
Two-year Plan
At the Partnership's board meeting on August 26, the Board of Director's approved the enclosed
Two-year Plan. This is a very aggressive work plan that focuses heavily on marketing Wright
County and its cities, as well as marketing of the Partnership and the services we provide to
businesses and cities in Wright County. The Board and I look forward to spreading the
impressive message of Wright County to existing and potential businesses, residents and visitors.
.
In order to implement the plan, the Partnership has formed three ad-hoc committees: Marketing
Materials, Membership Development and Workforce Development teams. Weare currently
looking to have representation on these teams from the community. If you would like to share
your expertise with any of these teams, please call me at 612/477-3086. Also, call me if you have
any comments on the Two-year Plan.
Thank you.
.
PO Box 525, 6800 ELECTRIC DRIVE, RocKFORD, MN 55373 (612) 477-3086; FAX (612) 477-3054
J
.
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIP
OF WRIGHT COUNTY
A Non-Profit Private I Public Development Partnership
~
TWO YEAR PLAN
2000-2001
.
Submitted by
Heidi Peper, Executive Director
August 1999
.
(
.
CONTENTS
Executive Summary... ... ... ... ... ...... ... ...... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...3
Marketing. . . ... . . . . . . . .. . _ . . . . . . . . . _ . . . . . . . . . _ _ . . . . . . . . . . . _. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . _ . . .4
Workforce Development.. . . . . . _. . . . . _ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Finance... ...... ...... ... ...... ... ......... ...... ...... ... ......... ... ... ... ... ... ......8
Membership. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9
.
.
2
I
.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
In late October of 1998, the Economic Development Partnership of Wright County's Board
of Directors met to develop a long range plan for the organization and to more clearly
define the Partnership's role in the development process. Building on input from
committees and guided by staff, the board continued its discussions at subsequent meetings
in November 1998 and January 1999.
Early on in the process, the Board concluded that the Partnership's role, in addition to
managing the Wright County Enterprise Fund, in Wright County's economic development
process will be that of a one-stop resource for community and economic development.
Although details of development will ultimately be up to each individual community, the
Partnership will encourage community and economic development by providing
information, facilitating resources and establishing networks.
With the organizational role clearly defined, the discussion shifted to how the Partnership
could carry out that role. Four key principles were developed to focus the Partnership's
activities and strengthen its capabilities.
1. Marketing - The Partnership is in an ideal position to market the county, its
communities and itself. Additionally, the Partnership will promote the retention and
growth of existing businesses and attract new business.
2. Workforce Development - The labor shortage in Wright County is not a unique
dilemma but a national phenomena. The Partnership will assist businesses face this
challenge through building a network of resources to help retain, recruit and train
. employees and increase their productivity.
3. Finance - A key component in economic development, the Partnership will continue to
research and seek additional funding options from both the private and public sectors.
Also, investigate sources to grow the Enterprise Fund.
4. Membership - Members provide financial support, input and credibility to the
Partnership. Although a fair portion of the organization's time and effort must be spent
on economic development issues and projects, time must also be taken to maintain and
expand the existing membership base and provide tangible benefits to members.
The following pages set clear objectives as well as specific goals and actions as they relate
to the key principles described above. A timeline for the completion and/or implementation
of the goals has been established and is attached. Additionally, a journal will be kept
detailing the progress of the goals and objectives.
.
3
7
.
.
.
I. MARKETING
Marketing is perhaps the primary activity of economic development. However, marketing
is more than simply placing an ad in a real estate journal or attending trade shows. Rather,
there are four stages in an economic development marketing plan: Research Stage,
Strategic Stage, Implementation Stage and Evaluation Stage. The Partnership's marketing
activities need to focus on promoting Wright County, the cities of Wright County and the
Partnership. The following objectives and goals outline how the Partnership will work
towards a comprehensive marketing plan.
OBJECTIVE 1:
Goal 1-1:
Goal 1-2:
OBJECTIVE 2:
Goal 2-1:
Conduct research to develop a comprehensive base of
information on which to establish a successful marketing
program.
Conduct a situational analysis and identify what Wright County has
o/value to offer businesses and residents, what industries are here
now, who our competitors are and the county's challenges and
opportunities.
1. Update the Wright County business database.
2. Complete a county-wide inventory of available industrial land
and buildings. Also identify development plans and development
tools of Wright County cities.
3. Utilize labor statistics from the Minnesota Department of
Economic Security to identify available workforce.
4. Create a directory of local, regional, state and federal community
and economic development programs.
Completed by 12/31/99
Conduct a situational analysis and identify what amenities Wright
County has to offer residents, workers and visitors.
Completed by 12/31/99
Develop an economic development strategy that matches what
Wright County and its cities otTer and their development goals.
Establish clear marketing goals and objectives.
1. Interview city and county officials and identify what is important
to their community in regards to growth and which industries
match their values and needs.
2. Define measurable results for success.
Completed by 12/31/99
4
.,
Goal 2-1:
Develop a County Marketing Profile that illustrates specific
industries. geographic focus and a database of supporting
materials. This will coincide with updating the OEDP.
Completed by 6/30/00
.
OBJECTIVE 3: Implement the economic development strategies that encourage
existing business retention and expansion, attract new businesses and
entrepreneurial activity and promotes use of recreational amenities.
Goal 3-1:
Undertake activities that retain businesses and encourage them to
expand.
1. Complete Business Retention & Expansion (ERE) surveys with a
cross-section of small and large industrial businesses in Wright
County, identifying which ones have expansion plans.
Completed by 12/31/99
2. Gather data on the University of Minnesota's BRE program,
including funding sources. Determine if the program will be
implemented in Wright County.
Completed by 2/29/00
.
3. Form partnership with the regional SBDC office to promote their
free services, which assist in business development, to Wright
County businesses and to further the Partnership's position as an
informational resource.
Formed by 10/31/99, ongoing
4. Promote the Partnership and its services through presentations at
meetings of chambers of commerce and Rotary.
Ongoing
5. Schedule and implement events and seminars that promote and
enhance businesses. May include business workshops, business
appreciation receptions and educational seminars.
Quarterly
6. Coordinate semi-annual direct-mail piece to existing businesses
promoting the Enterprise Fund and additional resources for
expansIOn.
March/Sept. Yearly
Goal 3-1:
Attract new and expanding companies to Wright County.
.
1. Create database of existing businesses and contacts within fIrms
outside the county who fit our County Marketing Profile.
Completed by 8/31/00
5
I
.
Goal 3-3:
.
Goal 3-4:
.
2. Webpage must be updated quarterly. Links need to be placed
with all appropriate sites (i.e. county, cities, DTED, etc.).
Become involved with TC Web when they expand membership
to market webpage.
Quarterly
3. Press Releases: All projects will receive media attention and
elected officials involved will be recognized.
Ongoing
4. Develop high quality marketing packet.
Completed by 1/31/00
5. Coordinate semi-annual direct-mail piece to qualified businesses
promoting the Enterprise Fund and additional resources for
relocation to and start-up in Wright County.
March/Sept. Yearly
Create and maintain a high-level awareness of Partnership by the
county, cities and businesses. Make it known that the Partnership is
the one-stop resource for new and existing businesses.
1. Publish monthly columns regarding economic development in all
(as many as will agree) community papers. This will coincide
with a montWy spotlight on KRWC.
Begin 2/1100, Monthly Thereafter
2_ Present at monthly meetings of area chambers of commerce,
Rotary and city councils and quarterly presentations to the
Wright County Board.
Ongoing
3. Exhibit at area business expos.
Ongoing
Implement marketing strategies that promote utilization of Wright
County recreational amenities - identified in the research stage - by
residents, workers and visitors.
1. Incorporate these amenities into brochure format so that it can be
marketed to the constituents listed above, potential and current
businesses in Wright County and posted on our webpage.
Completed by 4/29/00
6
I
OBJECTIVE 4:
.
Goal 4-1:
Goal 4-2:
Evaluation of the marketing plan must take place throughout
implementation of the plan and ultimately at the completion of
all stages.
Determine through interaction with community stakeholders what
impact the marketing activities have had on Wright County.
Ongoing
Whenever possible, incorporate a response mechanism in marketing
activities to solicit feedback.
Ongoing
II. Workforce Development
The Business Retention and Expansion survey conducted last year found that many
businesses consider the shortage of labor to be their primary barrier to growth.
Additionally, a report published by the Citizen League in November of 1998 recommended
that economic development efforts place an emphasis on addressing labor shortage issues.
The Partnership will address the labor shortage in Wright County by building a network of
resources that can improve business production.
.
OBJECTIVE I:
Goal 1-1:
.
Develop a network of existing local and state organizations that
can assist Wright County businesses with increasing their
productivity in a tight labor market.
Facilitate and promote the MN Jobs Skills Partnership in Wright
County.
1. Learn more about the MN Job Skills Partnership, which offers
financial assistance to companies working with educational
institutions to train new and existing employees.
. Meet with MN Job Skills Partnership Staff to discuss the
program and the Partnership's role in facilitating it in Wright
County.
. Meet with Standard Iron and other companies who have
used the program.
Meetings held by 12/31/99
2. Establish relationships with area technical colleges, the Wright
Technical Center and the Central Minnesota Jobs & Training
Services.
Meetings held by 12/31/99
3. Determine how the Partnership can coordinate these various
resources.
Determination made by 3/31/00
7
(
.
.
.
Goal 1-2:
Determination made by 3/31/00
4. Promote the program to Wright County businesses.
. Press Releases
. Direct Mail
. Industrial Networking Group
. Individual Meetings
Ongoing
Promote the resources available from Mi1111esota Technology to
Wright County businesses.
1. Staff and Board Members will meet with MN Technology
representatives to discuss how the Partnership can best promote
and/or facilitate MN Technology's resources.
Meetings Held by 12/31/99, Promotion Ongoing
III. FINANCE
Financial resources can spur entrepreneurial investment in the area, encourage existing
business to expand and attract new businesses to the area. Additionally, financial resources
reflect a community's friendly business climate.
OBJECTIVE 1:
Goall~l:
Goal 1-2:
Finance business expansions, start-ups and/or relocations in
Wright County through the Enterprise Fund.
Actively coordinate use of Enterprise Funds in conjunction with
other resources. EDP will be the coordinator that brings all
appropriate parties together to finance a deal(s).
Maintainfiscally sound management of the Enterprise Fund
1. Utilize Fund guidelines and checklists in review of all
applications and upon release of funds.
2. Upon approval, maintain ongoing contact with the businesses
using the Enterprise Fund loan.
8
I
.
.
.
OBJECTIVE 2:
Goal 2-1:
Explore options for establishing additional financial resources to
assist business expansion and attraction.
The Finance Committee will explore in detail each of the fol/owing
options:
1. Grow the dollars in the Wright County Enterprise Loan Fund.
2. Establish a venture capital fund and/or an incubator.
3. Identify grants for eligible projects.
4. Locate alternative sources of financing or capital from the
private sector.
Research into these options, (and others) may include meeting with
outside resources and measuring the interest in various models
within the county. Options could be explored and reported on
quarterly.
Completed by 12/31/00
IV. MEMBERSHIP
Membership is critical to the Partnership's continued success and growth. It provides
financial and political support as well as credibility to the Partnership. It also expands the
organization's network and resources. Not only must the Partnership seek new members, it
must maintain its existing membership base by delivering results.
OBJECTIVE I:
Goal 1-1:
Goal 1-2:
Goal 1-3:
Develop a systematic process that retains currents members.
Meet with existing government and business members throughout the
year to ensure satisfaction and identify their challenges and
opportunities.
Ongoing
Provide events and seminars of value to the membership to further
their knowledge and expand their business network.
Quarterly
Publish a resource guide that outlines all members and their
products/services. Additionally, list resources that assist business
development.
Completed by 6/30/00
9
I
OBJECTIVE 2:
-
Goal2~1:
Goal 2~2
Develop a comprehensive membership development plan that
will grow the Partnerships revenues and expand the resources
available to members.
Recruit new members who benefit from the Partnership's work in
economic development.
1. Identify business and organizations to target for membership.
Generate through existing members, businesses assisted in the
past and business directories.
Ongoing
2. Create a membership prospect package that outlines the benefits
of membership. Ideally, it would utilize the same shell as
marketing packet but with different inserts.
Completed by 1/31/00
3. Actively recruit those identified with mailings, phone calls and
meetings.
Ongoing
Modify cu"ent dues structure to be more reflective of what a
business pays and the extent to which the business benefits.
Completed by 12/31/00; Implement new dues structure 1/1/01
10
I
.
.
.
Council Meeting - 10/11/99
9.
Review of bids for city project #98-1SC, Bridee Park Lift Station Replacement. and
consideration of award of contract. (1.S.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
The bids for the bridge park lift station replacement were due Friday, October 8, 1999, at
10 a.m. five bids were received. They ranged from a high bid of $306,856.00 to a low bid
of $ 273,322.20. The low bid was submitted by Barbarossa and Sons, Inc. of Osseo,
Minnesota. A copy of the bid tabulation is enclosed for your review.
The above work does not include the following items which will be contracted for separately:
1. The alarm system for the lift station.
2. The backup generator for the lift station.
3. The replacement of the east curb along Walnut Street and the construction of angled
parking for West Bridge Park.
4. Reforestation of the trees removed for construction.
5.
Bringing three-phase power to the lift station from the alley behind Golden Valley
Furniture.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. The first alternative is to award a contract to the lowest responsible bidder,
Barbarossa & Sons, Inc. ofOsseo, Minnesota for $273,322.20. The new lift station
is to be on-line and operational by April 1,2000.
2. The second alternative would be not to award a contract.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is the recommendation of the City Administrator, Public Works Director, Sewer & Water
Superintendent, and the City Engineer that the City Council award a contract and proceed
with this project as outlined in alternative #1. This project is being funded through the
Sanitary Sewer Access Fund. This fund has sufficient dollars to fund this project in its
entirety.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of bid tabulation.
....
.
.
,
.
WSB
B.A. Mine/steadt, P.E.
Bret A Weiss, P.E.
Peter R. Willenbring, P.E.
Donald W. Sterna, P:E.
Ronald B. Bray, P.E.
350 Westwood Lake Office
8441 Wayzata Boulevard
Minneapolis, MN 55426
612.541-4800
FAX 541~1700
& Assoaates, Inc.
October 8, 1999
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of Monticello
P.O. Box 1147
Monticello, MN 55362
Re: Bridge Park Improvements, Lift Station, Sanitary Sewer & Appurtenant Work
City of Monticello Project No. 98-15C
WSB Project No. 2014.30
Dear Mayor and Council Members:
Bids were received for the above-referenced project at 10:00 a.m., October 8, 1999, and were
opened and read aloud. A total of five bids were received. The bids were checked for
mathematical accuracy and tabulated. Please find enclosed the bid tabulation indicating the
low bidder as Barbarossa & Sons, Inc., Osseo, MN in the amount of $273,322.20. We
recommend award of the contract to Barbarossa & Sons, Inc. in this amount.
Sincerely,
~;J;G
Bret A. Weiss, P.E.
City Engineer
Enclosures
c: Barbarossa & Sons, Inc.
Rick Wolfsteller, City of Monticello
nm
F: I WPWIM20 14.30Irecmmdtn.{tr-hmc. wpd
Infrastructure Engineers Planners
EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
.
BID TABULATION
Bridge Park Improvements, Lift Station, Sanitary Sewer & Appurtenant Work
Monticello, MN
City Project No. 98-15C
WSB Project No. 2014.30
Bids Opened: 10:00 A.M., October 8, 1999
Contractor Bid Security Total Bid
Barbarossa & Sons, Inc. X $273,322.20
Dave Perkins Contracting X $292,010.00
. Northdale Constr Co Inc X $299,434.25 **
R L Larson Exc Inc. X $306,856.00
LaTour Construction Inc X $317,349.40 **
Engineer's Estimate $249,203.50
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct tabulation of the bids as received on October 8, 1999.
~~~
Bret A. Weiss, P.E.
** Denotes corrected figure
,
.......
.
e
::I
..,.
0::
"'C
..
U
e
8
III
~
0::
..
C
~
(ij
.0::",
l!? 21
<0 '"
:::<Q
'0
z~
~
j
u "
III .l!!
"" III
OQ
i!"
~
0::
..
III
C
o
;I
.l9
VI
-=
~
ui'-f
'E 0 0
E ~ ~ ~
CD c: "II""" ~
> CU I 0:
o s:: = ~
ii ~ ,0
E=Z~Z
:;; Cl.::l! _ u
:;:0 ~.~
a..~:;.cre
~;~ ~ c..
:E~5z:.111
tOVI::l!U3:
.~
.:.; li ".
,~ g :g
!; ...t 2:
Cl.: --
Q3 .~ l
~d:d:
t
~::g
ijiii
I~
..,
...
.5
o
u
~'~18
0'0 LO
1i5 ~ ~!~
8 ~ ~i""
I
~ 8T8 g 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ il~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ & ~
I<;! .... ~ ... ....... ~
, I
i
....
'lii
"
o
u
~ 8 8
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
z ~ fi
gl~
~Ig
'" .....
.... ....
~ ~!~
ai ail.,..;
~ <O'~
... <;I~
I '
I i
~ ~ f?l
N c.j -rr:i
... ... ....
~88~ f?l ~~~Sl~""'~~~
~...~ ~ii a aEi~!~i~E~
Z; tFJ. 97W
....
..
C;I "'C
C;I "'C
g i:ii
~ ~
'" -'
~~
N
8 8 8 8 g 8
10 ~,I~ ~ ~ 8 ~
8~1;;<;""<;~
I
..,.
"
'ii
..
.::>
"
o
U
III
"
~ 0
~ "" lS 0
~:5 ~ ~
~ a.6~
C .... ....
goo 0
8 ~ ~ ~
Nft .. 419- En-
o ....
N ..
'"'C
N "'C
N _
.., III
..; ;;
li.3
g g
o 0
o 0
Il'J <0
ztlW
8 g 8 8 8
g ~ g 8 ~
~~a~~
I
o 0
o 0
o 0
o 0
..... Il'J
.... ....
.;
-= (Ii
:i 8
o
VI
<1/5
co
III
:g g 0
:;""!'loq8
~:5 ii: 15 8 coJ
III ;i ~ ....
888
~ ~ ~
",. N N
... ....
~8goo
~ '8 ~ ~
, ~ "I .... <;
~ w r;j: ~
g88g8
~~~~~
cti~r--:('f)a5
VI' ~0;;
g 8 8
~ 0 0
'" g g
... .... ....
....
"I 0
'" 0
~ ~
.... ..;
...
8 I ~ ~1 8 I~ ' ~ I s:
000 ..q. LQ!~ m
81~ :B f;'j ~ ~'~
z;,.... :H'I iii 1~!~iZ;
I I
+~
8 ol~ 0 ''''111l'J m 0 ~
dO 1"'if'llOl"-mO~O
0015 uil"':Na;i~IO ~
o~ ~ ~ ~ '; ~ ;;i3l~~i 0
~ Ef). ...... w .....,..- ~ I IWi g
w ! .
---I
88888888
~t<igg~Rg~
.... 0 (") 'I:t ,.... ~ ..... C\t
t;; ~t~~z;~fh
.... ...
8 8
N c:.;
.... ....
~8~f?l88
o~g,agj~
~w;; 0-
0::
o
'2
a.
o
~
u
o
o
'0 0
Q) 0
16Uio
" ,58 ;t
.2Ji
"
's,
o
'3 8 0
U""!'l>i~q
c: 'I:: cs
~ 0.. '
;1
888 :5
i ~ j i
....
000
000
o ~ ~
~ .... ....
8!8
010 <<i
~ la i ~~
~!
~
.... ,
"110
~ ~
~ 0
N 0,
.,. ;,;
g 8 888 8i8
,...: ci ~. 0 0 o!o
lD 0 U'"J 0 010
CQcg C'\!I.OO:CT,l
~ a ~ 0;; ;:i~
....
8
o
o
'"
Y>
o 0
o 0
N Iri
Il'J 0
.... ;;
gg~8ga8gg
~~~~~~ai~
~g;';ii;;~~ w
o 0
o 0
N N
... ...
o
8~0~~88
~~~~~ ~
....
~i2 0
~~ ~ ~ ~
;;: :] ..... ...... Ui
Lfjo '"
8 8 0
~ ~ ::
"" :r: Z
o;:UJV1U.>-U.VlUUJo
~ -' ~ ~ UJ -' -' ~ -' ~
~
~
~rn
~
I- fu Ei
Z C
0;: w::l w
,2 :::< -'
,@- ~ ~ 0
~ (!) cr. g: ~ :r:
O!~~~i~ !
~1Eall~~ ~
~~~~~u ~
~ v ~ U
~~~~~1>a~
~ iJ) :::< :::< I~~ ~:::<
:::< d ~ '~rc:if- Li ~
E 1i S
Q) E ~
==:f ~
;; ~
~ lO U')
;; g g
N ~ C\i
'" M '"
(i) ~ :B
g g g
N N N
o
~ ~ ~
.... ~ N
~
~ ci
:.::iZ......N(t')OJ:tIOCC.....a;)Q)
o
8 8 :; 8
~ ~ ! ~
888 8 8 8
~aai~"g
'V'T z; VI-
8 8
~ lri
.... ~
888 8 8 8 8 8
riaia~aia
8 8
a :a
15 8 8
~ a a
888
~ g g
w ~ ~
....
.,.
_.---
o
o g 8 ;::: 0
o c:i f.D 0
g ~~ g ~ g
~;;w~ ~
....
'" 0
'" 0
~Ig
&q.i~
o 0
o 0
o g
Il'J co.
~! ;;.
8 8
g g
;;. ~
I ,
~ g g ~ ~ 8 8 ~!a:~: g
"'~,'~o8 N 8880818,
"'." "'NIl'J,Il'Ja5,mlm
z; w oi r--: r--- ~ r- ~:(P)! ~ i
~~~ ~-4-
g8 88818[
~ ~ ~I~ g g'
;; ;;I~i
;,; I 1
8 8
~ ~
... ....
:5 g g 8 8 g
g g ~ g ~ g
;;;;f.t'ta;z;
~ 8
o 0
~ ~
8 8 8 8
g ~ g 0
:;; ;,; .... 15,
;,;
888
~ ~ g
w w c~
~
....
88888818!
ggg8gg!g
~ "'~ q (0 ~~ ~i o~
~ (")~~w ;;
....
..,.-
~ 8 8
:; ~ ~
.... .... ~
o
o 8 8 8 888 ~
~~Q~g~~~
;,;
Q)
0:>
'"
0..
8 8 8
g g si
z; ;; ~
o
o
g
o
r>i
.,.
""
o
000
000
o 0 g
~ ~ z;
I
o '" 0 8 8 0!8:810
q 0 q . 6 0 "Id 0
~ coJ ~ ~ ~ ori gl~ ~
,
~ 8 8 8 '" 0 8 0
m ~ ~ ~ ~ :3 ~ ;j
o
Il'J
o
!
I
l.l.1(.)
-'i~
I
w
cr.
~
:r: :r: I I :r: :r: :r:
~ >-l.l.U.u.u.U.U.U(.)(.)UU(.)~ l.l. l.l.~u.
SVl~~-'-'~~LtjLDLDLtjLtjLD -'~Ll.I-'
,or: i
~ ~ I I !
00 I
~;; 8' ~
w ~ 6 :E ~ ~
a::~1r~ ~ m ~
~~ ~ a :5
1Jj all a:: e. U) 0..
&, W W (!) W ='
a:: -' ~ zoo
Ow - a:: UJ
o :r: UJ 6 w 0..
~ ~ ~ m ~ I ~ I !;-,
f=~~ ~::;<<l'I~w!~i5
UJ;:(<C UJ mlm <<l wl_..J
X>UJ ~ :::<cr.I-cr.""~
w . @W~~f-..J:::<
o z* UJlu 5,f- U<<l
f-Qo ~~IWZ~~cr.
0!;(cr. Ol{!):tu 8, (!)~
w~;3 m~cr.(.)fu~;!
zVlz~::,::~u>lz'c~
b t;: <C[:; u ~ [5:~ ~llliffil'
u ::J In ~ ~ u u I ~ _t:+C!!~
I I ,I I I
~glggl2 2~fii~I~!fiil
~~~~.<O ~~~~I~:~i
~ N N NI~ ~ NN NiNI N
i I: i !
, ' I
-- -I----+--:l--+----~--,-- ,
:: ~ '" '<t ~ "'..... '" '" '" ~ "I '" ""1'1l'J1""..... """"'0 ~'"
. ~ ......__~ ......__........."INNNNiN NIN:N~(\J,~,
~
~(j)
@.J1?
>-a::~~~~
8 c~
~ :::< (!) ,
_ _ Z~
Zit);;;: iii
~~g::i
w :5 ~ ~
0.. U iii l-
ii: w IWZ
a::UJ~U)Q
W <CC<Cf-
~m~m:5
(/J ~ cr. ~ ~
~~:5.,;~
o ~ ~ (/J W
~ ~ ~"a ~
~ ~
g ~
N N
iii
(!)
z
i=
u:
.J cr. cr.
u w w cr.
Z ~ ~ Ll.I
~ UJ ~ ~
- ~ ~ VI
~ - - >-
W > > ~
u ~ ~ :>
:s (!) (!) ~
u. !El ~ (!)
1tJ cr. Ll.I 1tJ
.J @ @ d
u u (.) 0..
~ it it 5
o N Co to
...... '(- ,-- "f"'"
It) .... ....
~ to ~ ;(;
<0 ~ ~ ~
~~~~~
~
o
~
.... ....
~ lti in
~ ~ ~
w
-'
cr. 0
Ll.I :r:
~ Z
~ ~ 1Jj ~
ii: ii: >- >-
~ ~ W W ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
1Jj m ~ ~ ~ VI (/J
a:: a:: (/J 0.. 0.. (!) (!)
W W ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ g 0 ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ f2 f2
@ @ d :r: :r: 0 0
U U (.) ~ 0, W W
it it it x x ~ ~
~ rc ~ ~ ~ 8 8
IN N N
g g g
~ ~ ~
000
Il'J Il'J Il'J
N N N
--
"'
X
..ci
'"
'0
ill
:::J
W
(.)
(j)
z
~
0..
~
U.
/...~\
tij
~~
::l:Q
,0
z ~
~
"C
~ "
.. -lB
.c: '"
UO
i:'
.l!I
'2
..
Ul
Ii
o
,..
.l!I
Ul
!E
.....
:i~
I:: 0 c:>
E~ fi~
~; ~o
f I:: :I ~
o.~ . 0
E=Z~Z
:; o.:e ... "tl
Ci~.2~'!.
l1. 06- '0' f
.. .... B ~ e..
ell ?t:= -
~&-.6~31
a1Ul==U:=
~
~ g ~
'e- -l ::e
l1. 1i-
QJ '".. ~
1Il ~ e
s: l1. l1.
e
=
ell
'"'
"0
..
U
~
8
-'
o
I::
..
~
o !.... ;; f'~""".
o .....
u . I . g
.5 iil I I~
0 0 "t
u u
J:l a
.. I
'"
8 1 ,.
..
~ "" g ~ ;;:; ....
.J:. 1::. 0
t= :::Ie.. g 0:; 0:;
0 ~ th
Z
0 0 0 ...
l:II 0 0 0 ...
I:: 0:; ;i ~ d
tl iil ~ ...
~ ..
E 8 '" 00 N
th N '"
C ~ ~
0
U
~
:;: 8
i. :t:: 1'3 0 ~ ~
0
.. c: '1:: <<i ~
,. :::Ie.. th th ~
..
c ...
8 ~ ~ liij
u 0:; ~ 8 ~
.5 iil :il
iii 0 .; N ..;
U th N .....
C ~ N
0 ...
Ul
oll
.. ' ---- I---
.. 0
..
f 0
:t:: 8 0 0 ~
.e '" <Xl
c: '1:: N 0:;
... :::Ie.. th th ~
aI
8 8 8 :il
al ~ ;i d ~
0
men :i 0
E 0 i 0
c:;::>u N '"
o VI th t1i
'2 UJ <It
'Q.
0 ....1---
1ii 8
0
U "" 1'3 :il ~ ~
I:: '1:: N
:::Ie.. ~ ;; ~
th
~~ 0 8
0 ~
",- c:i
E g 0 ;i
:;::> ::l <Xl. ~
Lfjo ~ '"
. . "~ -
.- ~ u. Ul
c:
:J ...J ...J
--- r- -
...J
is
en
e..
0
I-
:..
:i
c ~ 0:
0 ~
"" .J
0-
'0 U
.. ~ III
<II ~
Cl ~
<(
:) t:
UJ ~
e.._en (')
~!z (') Z
(') UJ ~ ir
z::l: !Q UJ
- UJ > ~
Cl U UJ ~
8:) ...J
III e....J~'" E- o
I iii
j~ '" .J
15 IN N :!
.0 > >
_ ::l ..... i:5 is 0
z '" l-
N
0
..- - %
~ ci ~ ~ <'i ~
::;z C)
..
x
Li
'"
'S
iii
::i
UJ
()
><
UJ
z
3:
~
Ii
U)
....
..
.. "0
<=!"O
~iii
<=!. :I
~ .9
"'1l
N
c:> ....
"! ..
~~
... aI
~ ~
~...J
c
o
C
'Q.
o
~
U
....
'0
N
'"
g'
n.
.
BlUJ)(lBP."
SANl/IA'RF'
Cl'J!.'Y'1tll i'
Bids Opened: 10:00 a.m.
October 8, 1999
Contractor
ANNANDAlE CONTRACTING, INC.
BARBAROSSA AND SONS, INC.
BROWN & CRIS, INC.
DAVE PERKINS CONTRACTING,INC.
INLAND UTiliTY CONSTRUCTION
LATOUR CONSTRUCTION,INC.
NORTHDAlE CONSTRUCTION
QUAM CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
R.l. LARSON EXCAVATING
. RANDY KRAMER EXCAVATING, INC.
REDSTONE CONSTRUCTION
RICHARD KNUTSON, INC.
S.J. lOUIS CONSTRUCTION, INC.
Engineer's Estimate
Bid Security
WSB & Associates, Inc.
Project No. 2014.30
Total Bid
c~
o
~ 73 Z:Z. ZO
IS fl,_
?,CfZ. 0/ D. DO
,.~
"31, ~ 50.0 (
2 <i <<:t '-13'1. 75
?~-
9b
~Ob 856..()o
$
220,000.00
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct tabulation of the bids as received on October 8,
1999.
.
Bret A. Weiss, P .E.
*Denotes Corrected Figure
F,\WPWIM101'.jOI$pec'hidt.~. "'po
~2
s
q
.
.
.
Co unci I Meeting - 10/11/99
10.
Consideration ofChane:e Order No.1 for the Kjellber~'s West Sanitary Sewer
Extension, City Proiect #99-01C. (1.S.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
The sanitary sewer extension to Kjellberg's West Mobile Home Park has been awarded but
construction is not yet started. Construction was delayed due to a request from Mr. Kjellberg
to reduce the financial security on the project. Construction, however, is slated to begin
within the next week to ten (10) days. During a recent review of the proposed sanitary sewer
line, it was noticed that we had not provided any connections for a major portion of our 68
acre parcel which the line passes through. The City Engineer and City Staff are suggesting
that the Council authorize the installation of at least two connection points along the line for
future development of our property. Change Order No. 1 would add two outside drop
connections at a total cost of $2,592.
Although construction was slated to start in the very near future, some complications have
arisen with the connection to the west park. It appears that Mr. Kjellberg has started
construction of his mobile home park expansion. It appears from observations by the City
Attorney, City Staff, the MN Pollution Control Agency, the MN Health Department and
Wright County Planning and Zoning, that the expansion may be semi-complete in some
areas with the installation of water and sewer services, and the placement of some estimated
35,000 cubic yards of fill material. None of these parties have indicated that they have
issued any permits for this construction. If the assumptions and observations of these
individuals are correct, we may be hooking up a number of illegal connections if we make
the final connection to Kjellberg's sanitary sewer system. The county has issued a stop work
order on the project, however, it appears that some work may still be progressing.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. The first alternative is to approve Change Order No.1 in the amount 01'$2,592 to the
contract with R. L. Larson Excavating, Inc., for the Kjellberg's sewer extension, City
Project #99-01C.
2. The second alternative would be not to approve the change order.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is the recommendation of the City Administrator based on input from the Deputy
Administrator, Public Works Director, City Engineer and City Attorney that the City Counci I
approve alternative # 1, thereby approving Change Order No.1.
.
Council Agenda-October 11, 1999
Discussions with the City Engineer, City Attorney and staff indicate that the construction of
the sanitary sewer extension should not continue until we can verify that no illegal
connections exist to the system and Mr. Kjellberg has met the requirements of our agreement
for the extension of the sanitary sewer.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of change order information from WSB.
.
.
OCT- 8-99 FRI 11:33 AM PUBLIC WORKS
FAX NO. 16122713272
P. 2/ 3
.p..~ ..
.
CHANGE O~DER NO.1
KJElLB~RG'i WEST SANITARY SEWER E!XTI!:NS10N
CITV OP MONTICELlO Pf\OJECT NO. 99.o1C
WSB PROJIOCT NO. 1010.80
_____..__.__.... I. .--------...
Owner;
City of Monti~lI~ .
R. L. Larson Excavating, Inc.
Date of Issuance:
Engineer:
September 15, 1999
WSB & Associates, Inc,
Contractor:
You 8fe direct.ed 10 make the following changes In the Contract Document description:
./-_..1......'
........'.01,:. ...~..., ~Iol\l........ 6.,; .' . _"_' ,....
Contract completion date is extended from August 31. 1999 to October 31,1999.
10' Outside Drop Sections are added to the contract.
Attachment: Itemized schedule
CHANGE IN CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Price:
$107,428.20 Original Contract Time:
August 31, 1999
.", - ----. ....-.. .. . .-"'.----...-..--- .. .~ ..,~_. -.----------
PrevIous Change Orders; No. - to-
$0.00 Net Change from Previous Change Orders: None
.---.-----.- -..- ....
.. ..--.. -........ . \\.- ..--
$107,4~8,~0 Contract Time Prior to This Change Order: August 31,1999
Contract Price Prior to This Change Order:
_.__....._.__..... - . _. ....._._ __. . - ..1.- .. .
Net Increase of This Change Order:
$2.592.00 Net Increase of Change Order:
30 days
...- ------~....-
October 31, 1999
Contract Price With All Approved Change Orders: 5110,020.20 Contract Time With Approved Change
Orders:
-,--.-. .... .... ........---... ---
~
~j)~>
Bret A. Weiss, P .E.
Approved By:
. Approved By:
R. L. Larson Excavatin~. ~____
Contractor
Date of Council Action:
Inc.
City Engineer
City Adminiliitrator
.
10
.
.,.. .
.
OCT- 8-99 FRI 11:33 AM PUBLIC WORKS
FAX NO, 16122713272
P. 3/ 3
~ ~.SI'~~;>":~:~~~~'I).:.\ :r;::' . :'.' :.. ~'I~"'. .;.:: .": /"'1 '.Iv ......:.J....... j. ... '.. \: ....
.. .. .'n' .........
.
.
Change Order No.1
KJELlQ.li.RG'e. WE.ST SANITARY SEWER EXTENSION
CITY OF MONTICEllO PROJECT NO. g9~1C
WSB PROJECT NO. 1010.80
Addid Item
Item ~~~'~:'~~:'-r-- ~..__.- n. . ~e~~~~;i:~'" .. .. -'-"-r-'~~;I . .;-'.' .~~~~. ... ", ~'~i't 'Pri'~~ . . Item Total
N;. ... i "'. OU\~;~~ 0'0; ~;;.,;;;;,;_.. on 0 u_ -- [-;~~"i--~~';;; ~=~~. ; ,2~. O~_ 0 _.. ~.5~200
Total Add
$2,592.00
JO
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
,0/01/1999 10:10:31
Schedule of Bills
CITY OF MONTICELLC
GLOSOS-V06.00 COVERPAGE
GL540',
.
Reoort Selection:
~UN GROUP... 0930
COMMENT... 9/30 CKS
OA T A-J E- ID
DATA COMMENT
0-09301999-098 9/30 CKS
~un Instruct;ons:
joba Banner Coo;es Form Printer Hold Soace LPI Lines CPI
J 01 Y S 6 066 1Q
.
.
3RC FINANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF MONTICELLO
10/01/1999 10: 10: 32 Schedule of ems GL540R-V06.00 PAGE 1
~R NAME
ESCRI PTION AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME ;UNO & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE POll F/P ID LINE
ASSOCIATED MERCHANT PAPE
227.00 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES 609.49754.2099 19390 098 00038
BELLBOY CORPORATION BAR
676.91 LIOUOR 509.49750.2510 17324200 098 00023
BERNICK'S PEPSI COLA COM
77.60 BEER 609.49750.2520 64026 098 00026
98.05 MISC TAXABLE 609.49750.2540 64027 098 00025
175.65 *VENDOR TOTAL
CONSOLIDATED PLASTICS
REFUSE 222.39 RECYCLING BINS ~Q1.43230.2411 4049309 098 00039
DAHLHEIMER DISTRIBUTING
LIOUOR STORE 2,054.99CR 8EER 609.49750.2520 52994 098 00003
LIOUOR STORE 3.987.55 BEER 609.49750.2520 53396 098 00002
LIOUOR STORE 46.00 MISC TAXABLE 609.49750.2540 53397 098 00004
LIOUOR STORE 19.20 MISC TAXABLE 609.49750.2540 53449 098 00005
LI OUOR STORE 207.15 BEER 609.49750.2520 53779 098 00001
2,204.91 *VENDOR TOTAL
D~ETERSON'S FORD-MER
ETS 882.76 VEHICLE REPAIR PARTS 101.43120.2211 93401 098 00040
DNR FIRE CENTER
FIRE 250.00 FREIGHT 101.42201.3330 FREIGHT 098 00076
DYNA SYSTEMS
SHOP 333.84 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 101.43127.2199 10113691 098 00041
EARL F ANDERSON & ASSOCI
WILDWOOD 821. 31 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 101.43111.3199 18168 098 00042
G & K SERVICES
DEP REG 73.78 REPAIR & MTC - BUILDINGS 101_41990.4010 098 00044
ENV CHARGE 183.16 MISC OTHER EXPENSE 101.43120.4399 098 00045
SHOP TOWELS 94.55 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 101.43127.2199 098 00046
SEWER 103.50 UNIFORM RENTAL 602.49490.4170 098 00047
WATER 212.70 UNIFORM RENTAL 501.49440.4170 098 00048
PW ADM 53.40 UNIFORM RENTAL 101.43110.4170 098 00049
PW INSP 150.30 UNIFORM RENTAL 101.43115,4170 098 00050
STREETS 414.35 UNIFORM RENTAL 101.43120.4170 098 00051
PARKS 320.50 UNIFORM RENTAL 225.45201.4170 098 00052
1.606.24 *VENDOR TOTAL
GENERAL RENTAL CENTER
.EER PARK 192 .33 PIONEER PARK IMPR 225.45202.5323 35148 098 00056
SE 35.09 MISC OTHER EXPENSE 101.43230.4399 35182 098 00055
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF MONTICELLO
10/01/1999 10:10:32 Schedule of Bills GL540R-V06.00 PAGE 2
. NAME
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME "UNO & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE POll F/P 10 LINE
GENERAL RENTAL CENTER
PW !NSP 76.63 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 101.43115.2199 35402 098 00054
SHOP 24.01 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 101.43127.2199 605476 098 00053
328.06 "'VENDOR TOTAL
GLEN'S TRUCK CENTER
SHOP 58.46 VEHICLE REPAIR PARTS 101.43127.2211 00134994 098 00057
GRAINGER/W.W.
LIBRARY 475.63 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 211.45501.2199 495-356609-0 098 00058
GREEN SIDE UP LAWN & TRE
PARKS-WEED CONTROL 119.39 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 225.45201.3199 OCT 15 098 00059
GRIGGS. COOPER & COMPANY
LIOUOR STORE 10.50 FREIGHT 609.49750.3330 098 00007
LIOUOR STORE 1. 50 FREIGHT 609.49750.3330 098 00009
LIOUOR STORE 80.25 FREIGHT 609.49750.3330 098 00014
LIOUOR STORE 9,109.87 LIOUOR 609.49750.2510 110084 098 00015
LIQUOR STORE 2.25 MISC TAXABLE 609.49750.2540 110085 098 00011
LIOUOR STORE 182.92 WINE 609.49750.2530 110459 098 00010
LIOUOR STORE 436.80 WINE 609.49750.2530 110460 098 00008
.OR STORE 45.10CR LIOUOR 609.49750.2510 118620 098 00012
OR STORE 30.25CR LIOUOR 609.49750.2510 119082 098 00013
9,748.74 "'VENDOR TOTAL
GROSSLEIN BEVERAGE INC.
1,908.10 BEER 509.49750.2520 174910 098 00024
HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT
SEWER 783.31 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS 602.49490.2160 207048 098 00061
WATER 221.28 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS 601.49440.2160 207050 098 00060
1. 004 .59 "'VENDOR TOTAL
HDR ENGINEERING, INC.
WWTP 5,385.63 PROF SRV - ENGINEERING F 436.49201.3030 164-15836 098 00062
HERMES/GERALD T
LIBRARY 227.50 PROF SRV - CUSTODIAL 211.45501.3110 OCT 15 098 00063
HOLIDAY CREDIT OFFICE
FIRE-FUEL 45,49 MOTOR FUELS 101,42201.2120 098 00064
JOHNSON BROS WHOLESALE L
144,00 LI QUOR 609.49750,2510 098 00030
9.83CR WINE 609.49750.2530 101109 098 00031
1. 70 FREIGHT 509.49750.3330 1025189 098 00029
. 135.87 "'VENDOR TOTAL
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF MONTICELLO
10/01/1999 10:10:32 Schedule of Bills GL540R-V06.00 PAGE 3
_R NAME
I ESCRI PTION AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE POll F/P 10 LINE
K MART STORE
COMM CENTER 12.33 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 461.49201.2199 140 098 00177
KOROPCHAK/OLlVE
TRAVEL EXP REIMB 70.30 TRAVEL EXPENSE 101.46501.3310 098 00186
CO ATLAS REIMB 15.00 BOOKS & PAMPHLETS 101.46501.4350 098 00187
85.30 "'VENDOR TOTAL
KRAEMER. LORI
PLANNING REIMB 42.18 TRAVEL EXPENSE 101.41910.3310 098 00065
L 'N' R SERVICES - LOCKS
DEP REG 140.37 REPAIR & MTC - BUILDINGS 101.41990.4010 7313 098 00066
LASER SHARP, INC.
DATA PROC 95.85 DATA PROCESSING SUPPLIES 101.41920.2025 28518 098 00067
LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITI
CH 4.465.00 DUES. MEMBERSHIP & SUBSC 101.41110.4330 MEMBER DUES 098 00068
M. B.P.
STREETS 634.54 MOTOR FUELS 101.43120.2120 28817 098 00176
. FINANCING
CH-COPIER CONTRACT 617 . 27 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS 101.41301.3190 SEPT 098 00069
MARTIE'S FARM SERVICE
STREETS 60.01 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 101.43120.2199 385558 098 00072
CREDIT 57.45CR MISC REPAIR & MTC SUPPLI 224.46102.2299 387476 098 00070
RIVER MILL 1. 97 RIVER MILL PARK IMPR 225.45202.5324 388771 098 00071
AN SHELTER 29.98 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 101.42701.2199 389563 098 00073
34,51 *VENDOR TOTAL
MENARD. INC
PIONEER PARK 257.20 PIONEER PARK IMPR 225.45202.5323 76681 098 00074
PIONEER PARK 175.62 PIONEER PARK IMPR 225.45202.5323 76843 098 00075
432.82 *VENDOR TOTAL
MN DEPART OF NATURAL RES
DEP REG 997.00 DNR PAYABLE 101.20811 098 00164
MN DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY
LIOUOR 20.00 LICENSES & PERMITS 609.49754.4370 BUYER'S CARD 098 00077
MN STATE FIRE DEPARTMENT
FIRE 150.00 DUES. MEMBERSHIP & SUBSC 101.42201.4330 STATE DUES 098 00078
1IIIICELLO CHAMBER OF CO
TH 125.00 BROCHURES (MARKETING PRO 101.46501.3560 098 00080
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF MONTICELLO
10/01/1999 10:10:32 Schedule of Bills GL540R-V06.00 PAGE 4
tR NAME
ESCRI PYlON AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME 'UNO & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE POll F/P 10 LINE
MONTICELLO COMMUNITY PAR
FESTIVAL OF COLORS 30.00 GENERAL PUBLIC INFORMATI 101.41940.3520 098 00081
MTI DISBTRIBUTING CO.
PARKS 91. 70 VEHICLE REPAIR PARTS 225.45201.2211 1304034 098 00082
NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS
JOHN M 71.32 TELEPHONE 502.49490.3210 098 00083
TOM B 198.40 TELEPHONE 101.43115.3210 098 00084
RICH C 71.32 TELEPHONE 602.49490.3210 098 00085
ROGER M 71.32 TELEPHONE 101.43120.3210 098 00086
GARY A 71. 32 TELEPHONE 101.42401.3210 098 00087
FRED P 77.02 TELEPHONE 101.42401.3210 098 00088
560.70 *VENDOR TOTAL
NORTHERN STATES POWER CO
WATER 4.460.15 ELECTRIC 601.49440.3810 098 00094
SEWER 205.61 ELECTRIC 602.49490.3810 098 00095
PARKING LOTS 87.95 ELECTRIC 101.43140.3810 098 00096
CIVIL DEFENSE 14.27 ELECTRIC 101.42501.3810 098 00097
LI BRARY 587.15 ELECTRIC 211.45501.3810 098 00098
OEP REG 106.76 ELECTRIC 101.41990.3810 098 00099
.OR STORE 1.518.31 ELECTRIC 609.49754.3810 098 00100
1,122.45 ELECTRIC 101.41940.3810 098 00101
AN SHELTER 110.08 ELECTRIC 101.42701.3810 098 00102
FIRE 264.99 ELECTRIC 101.42201.3810 098 00103
RENTAL HOUSE 6.06 RENTAL HOUSE EXPENSES 240.49201.4381 098 00104
SHOP 718.19 ELECTRIC 101.43127.3810 098 00105
PARKS 880.24 ELECTRIC 225.45201.3810 098 00106
STREET LIGHTS 588.95 ELECTRIC 101.43160.3810 098 00107
10.671.16 *VENDOR TOTAL
NORTHERN TOOL & EOUIPMEN
SEWER 32 .46 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 602.49490.2199 098 00090
STREETS 83.48 REPAIR & MTC - VEHICLES 101.43120.4050 098 00091
PIONEER PARK 784.83 PIONEER PARK IMPR 225.45202.5323 19233257 098 00092
PARKS 837.58 VEHICLE REPAIR PARTS 225.45201.2211 19330618 098 00093
STREETS-l0 CIRCUIT TRANS 425.99 OTHER EOUIPMENT 101.43120.5801 562121 RI 098 00089
2,164.34 *VENDOR TOTAL
NORTHWEST ASSOC CONSULTA
COUNTRY CLUB REZONING 280.50 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 101.41910.3199 098 00197
TATTOO CODE 43.39 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 101.41910.3199 8885 098 00190
GENERAL 281. 70 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 101.41910.3199 8885 098 00191
OAA PLAN 879.39 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 101.41910.3199 8885 098 00192
GROVELAND PLAT 306.00 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 101.41910.3199 8886 098 00193
VILLAGE APTS 213.24 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 101.41910.3199 8886 098 00194
.LING WOODS 119.00 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 101.41910.3199 8886 098 00195
TLE MTN FEED PUB 34.00 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 101.41910.3199 8886 098 00196
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF MONTICELLO
10/01/1999 10: 10: 32 Schedule of Bills GL540R-V06.00 PAGE 5
.R NAME
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE POll F/P ID LINE
NORTHWEST ASSOC CONSULTA
AUGUST MEETINGS 600.00 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 101.41910.3199 8887 098 00189
2,757.22 ~VENDOR TOTAL
NOVAK FLECK, INC
REFUND 14-0403-0001 23.40 ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE 601. 11501 098 00108
OLSON & SONS ELECTRIC, I
ST LIGHTING 177. 50 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 101.43160.3199 17758 098 00110
PARKS 70.07 REPAIR & MTC - BUILDINGS 225.45201.4010 4161 098 00109
247.57 ~VENDOR TOTAL
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
LIOUOR STORE 13.60 FREIGHT 609.49750.3330 098 00016
LIOUOR STORE 104.55 FREIGHT 609.49750.3330 098 00018
13.37CR WINE 609.49750.2530 3201610 098 00036
6.16CR LI OUOR 609.49750.2510 3201611 098 00037
5.95CR WINE 609.49750.2530 3201612 098 00035
3.50CR WINE 609.49750.2530 3201613 098 00034
4.16CR WINE 609.49750.2530 3201614 098 00033
4.81CR WINE 609.49750.2530 3201615 098 00032
!.J OUOR STORE 1.029.85 LIOUOR 609.49750.2510 535083 098 00017
.UOR STORE 4,750.05 WINE 609.49750.2530 535084 098 00019
5.860.10 ~VENDOR TOTAL
PIONEER
PARKS 202.35 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 225.45201.2199 47494 098 00111
PIPELINE SUPPLY, INC.
PARKS 118.57 VEHICLE REPAIR PARTS 225.45201.2211 S1381483.001 098 00114
PARKS 23.17 VEHICLE REPAIR PARTS 225.45201. 2211 S1381483.002 098 00112
CSAH 75 3.73 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 467.49201.2199 S1382447.001 098 00113
145.47 ~VENDOR TOTAL
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GR
WWTP CONTRACT 37,095.42 PROF SRV - PSG, INC 602.49480.3080 AUGUST 098 00115
WWTP CONTRACT 37,095.42 PROF SRV - PSG, INC 602.49480.3080 SEPT 098 00116
74.190.84 ~VENDOR TOTAL
PURCELL'S PLUMBERY
SHOP 14.56 BUILDING REPAIR SUPPLIES 101.43127.2230 004617-1769 098 00179
COMM CENTER 11.44 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 461.49201.2199 004624-1769 098 00180
SHOP 37.90 BUILDING REPAIR SUPPLIES 101.43127.2230 004629-1769 098 00178
PW 125.00 BUILDING REPAIR SUPPLIES 101.43127.2230 015568 098 00117
188.90 ~VENDOR TOTAL
RELIANCE DATA CORPORATIO
.A PROC 1.102.00 PROF SRV - DATA PROCESSI 101.41920.3090 24577 098 00118
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF MONTICELLO
10/01/1999 10:10:32 Schedule of Bills GL540R-V06.00 PAGE 6
_OR NAME
ESCRIPTION AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE POll FIP ID LINE
RELI ANT ENERGY
LIOUOR 11.15 GAS 609.49754.3830 098 00119
RIVER BEND INDUSTRIES,
PARKS 199.49 VEHICLE REPAIR PARTS 225.45201.2211 069163 098 00120
RL LARSON EXCAVATING, IN
CSAH 75 313,903.23 PROF SRV - CONSTRUCTION 461.49201.3025 111 098 00188
RON'S GOURMET ICE
LIOUOR STORE 276.96 MISC TAXABLE 609.49750.2540 49452 098 00006
ROYAL PRINTING & OFFICE
PW 34.52 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES 101.43110.2099 7266 098 00127
PARKS 6.92 FREIGHT 225.45201.3330 7267 098 00126
PARKS 9.16 FREIGHT 225.45201.3330 7268 098 00125
CH 16.87 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES 101.41301.2099 7269 098 00124
PARKS 7. 38 FREIGHT 225.45201.3330 7270 098 00123
PW 105.80 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES 101.43110.2099 7271 098 00122
LI BRARY 42.60 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES 211. 45501. 2099 7272 098 00121
PW 8.71 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES 101.43110.2099 1361 098 00185
PW 79.72 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES 101.43110.2099 7362 098 00183
eSHEL TER 23.00 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES 101.43110.2099 7363 098 00184
21. 62 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES 101.42701.2099 7364 098 00182
356.30 ~VENDOR TOTAL
ROYAL TIRE OF MONTICELLO
PARKS 56.39 EOUIPMENT REPAIR PARTS 225.45201.2210 071106 098 00128
PARKS 12.00 REPAIR & MTC - VEHICLES 225.45201.4050 011386 098 00130
PARKS 325.43 REPAIR & MTC - VEHICLES 225.45201.4050 071393 098 00132
PARKS 23.43 VEHICLE REPAIR PARTS 225.45201.2211 071449 098 00131
PARKS 419.05 REPAIR & MTC - VEHICLES 225.45201.4050 011731 098 00133
PARKS 277.74 VEHICLE REPAIR PARTS 225.45201.2211 071732 098 00129
1.114.04 ~VENDOR TOTAL
SALZWEDEL/PATRICIA A.
AN SHELTER 1.227.43 PROF SRV - ANIMAL CTRL 0 101.42701.3120 OCT 15 098 00079
SCHILLEWAERT LANDSCAPING
SHADE TREE 5,697.75 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 224.46102.3199 633035 098 00134
SHERBURNE COUNTY RECORDE
SUE-NOTARY 25.00 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 101.41301.3199 098 00135
SIMONSON LUMBER COMPANY
STREETS 49.55 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 101.43120.2199 098 00136
PARKS 81.24 REPAIR & MTC - BUILDINGS 225.45201.4010 098 00137
.EER PARK 99.12 PIONEER PARK IMPR 225.45202.5323 098 00138
236.51 ~VENDOR TOTAL
------ ---,-~~,_._-_.,..,- ~-_._-----~-_._,--------- ------
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF MONTICELLO
10/01/1999 10: 10: 32 Schedule of Bills GL540R-V06.00 PAGE 7
.R NAME
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE POll F/P 10 LINE
SIMPSON/CYNTHIA R
FIRE HALL-CLEANING 50.00 PROF SRV - CUSTODIAL 101.42201.3110 SEPTEMBER 098 00139
SOFTWARE SPECTRUM
DATA PROC 256.67 SOFTWARE 101.41920.3091 5314699 098 00141
DATA PROC 150.90 SOFTWARE 101.41920.3091 5315627 098 00140
407.57 *VENDOR TOTAL
TERRA PRODUCTS
RIVERSIDE CEMETARY 215.16 MISC OTHER EXPENSE 651.49010.4399 2758A 098 00142
THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMP
3.756.10 BEER 609.49750.2520 173157 098 00022
TRUEMAN-WELTERS. INC.
SHOP 222.05 BOOKS & PAMPHLETS 101.43127.4350 193971 098 00144
TRUGREEN-CHEMLAWN-MTKA
PARKS-WEED CONTROL 1,491.00 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS 225.45201.2160 735747 098 00143
U SLINK
PARKS 1. 30 TELEPHONE 225.45201.3210 098 00145
.SHEL TER 43.34 TELEPHONE 101.41301.3210 098 00146
7. 80 TELEPHONE 101.42701.3210 098 00147
WATER 1. 37 TELEPHONE 601.49440.3210 098 00148
PW 25.16 TELEPHONE 101.43110.3210 098 00149
BLDG INSP 9.49 TELEPHONE 101.42401.3210 098 00150
DEP REG 4.18 TELEPHONE 101.41990.3210 098 00151
COMM CENTER 3.89 TELEPHONE 226.45122.3210 098 00152
LIOUOR STORE 12.93 TELEPHONE 609.49754.3210 098 00153
109.46 *VENDOR TOTAL
U S POSTMASTER
LIOUOR STORE 33.00 POSTAGE 609.49754.3220 STAMPS 098 00154
US WEST DIRECTORY ADVERT
LIOUOR STORE 33.40 ADVERTISING 609.49754.3499 098 00155
VIKING COCA COLA
PW 87.33 MISC OTHER EXPENSE 101.43110.4399 2225695 098 00157
CH 23.16 MISC OTHER EXPENSE 101.41940.4399 2227677 098 00156
110.49 *VENDOR TOTAL
WASTE MANAGEMENT. INC
REFUSE 5,023.51 PROF SRV - REFUSE COLLEC 101.43230.3100 21778 098 00181
WATER LABORATORIES. INC
eER 20.00 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 601.49440.3199 991-403 098 00159
ER 10.00 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 601.49440.3199 991-603 098 00158
30.00 *VENDOR TOTAL
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF MONTICELLO
10/01/1999 10:10:32 Schedule of Bills GL540R-V06.00 PAGE 8
'OR NAME
ESCRI mON AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE POll F/P ID LINE
WATSON COMPANY. INC/THE
48.44 LIOUOR STORE SUPPLIES 609.49754.2140 098 00028
155.17 MISC TAXABLE 609.49750.2540 551685 098 00027
203.61 *VENDOR TOTAL
WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITOR-TR
HWY 25 947.00 PROPERTY TAXES 450.49201.3710 PROP TAXES 098 00168
COMM CENTER 890.00 PROPERTY TAXES 461.49201.3710 PROP TAXES 098 00169
HRA 327.00 LAND 213.46500.5101 PROP TAXES 098 00170
HRA 374.00 LAND 213.46500.5101 PROP TAXES 098 00171
HRA 127.91 LAND 213.46500.5101 PROP TAXES 098 00172
KRAMER HOUSE 1.309.00 LAND 240.49201.5101 PROP TAXES 098 00173
BOHANAN FARM 1.931.00 PROPERTY TAXES 602.49480.3710 PROP TAXES 098 00174
ISLAND ACROSS PW 264.00 LAND 265.49201.5101 PROP TAXES 098 00175
6.169.91 *VENDOR TOTAL
WRIGHT COUNTY RECORDER
KLEIN FARMS 5TH 41. 50 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 101.41910.3199 1199900000932 098 00160
CHIN YUEN-SILVER FOX 29.50 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 101.41910.3199 1199900000933 098 00161
HWY 25-AD.PETRO 1NC 19.50 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERV1C 450.49201.3199 1199900000935 098 00162
90.50 *VENDOR TOTAL
~T-HENNEPIN COOP ELE
EET LIGHTS 9.00 ELECTRIC 101.43160.3810 098 00165
SECURITY LIGHTS 12.51 ELECTRIC 101.43160.3810 098 00166
21.51 *VENDOR TOTAL
WSB & ASSOCIATES. INC.
CSAH 75 28.961.83 PROF SRV - ENGINEERING F 101.41910.3030 01109.10-00005 098 00167
ZIEGLER CAT
STREETS 4.695.76 REPAIR & MTC - MACH & EO 101.43120.4044 SW080013660 098 00163
.
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
10/01/1999 10:10:32
eR NAME
DESCRIPTION
REPORT TOTALS:
.
,
AMOUNT
501.599.11
ACCOUNT NAME
RECORDS PRINTED - 000194
Schedule of Bills
FUND & ACCOUNT
CITY OF MONTICELLO
GL540R-V06.00 PAGE 9
CLAIM INVOICE PO# FIP 10 LINE
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
10/01/1999 10:10:36
Schedule of Bills
.
FUND RECAP:
FUND DESCRIPTION
DISBURSEMENTS
----------------------------
iOl GENERAL FUND
211 LI BRARY FUND
213 HRA FUND
224 SHADE TREE FUND
225 PARK FUND
226 COMMUNITY CENTER
240 CAPITAL PROJECT REVOLVING FD
265 WATER ACCESS FUND
436 93-14C WWTP EXPANSION PRJ
450 96-04C HWY25/MNDOT IMPR
461 98-03C COMMUNITY CENTER
467 98-17C CSAH 75/E BROW IMPR
601 WATER FUND
602 SEWER FUND
609 MUNICIPAL LIOUOR FUND
651 RIVERSIDE CEMETERY
60.593.28
1.332.88
828.91
5.640.30
7.091.77
3.89
1.315.05
264.00
5.385.63
966.50
913.77
313.906.96
4.948.90
77. 389.36
26.802.74
215.16
TOTAL ALL FUNDS
507.599.11
.
BANK RECAP:
BANK NAME
DISBURSEMENTS
----------------------------
GENL GENERAL CHECKING
LIOR LIQUOR CHECKING
480.796.37
26.802.74
TOTAL ALL BANKS
507.599.11
THE PRECEDING LIST OF BILLS PAYABLE WAS REVIEWED AND APPROVED FOR PAYMENT.
DATE ............
APPROVED BY
..' ...... ........... .............
.. .... ................. ..........
.. ... _to.. ...... ow..... ...........
.
CITY OF MONTICELLO
GL060S-V06.00 RECAP PAGE
GL540R
-----..-.
.
8RC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
10/04/1999 10:58:26
Payments for publication
CITY OF MONTICELLO
GL050S-V06.00 COVERPAGE
GL335R
.
Reoort Selection:
A 0 0 r 0 v al Date...................... '1 0 /1 1 /1 9 9 9
pavments Through Date. ..... .-..-.,. 09/30/1999
Cutoff Amount to be Used... .., -.."
RUN GROUP... D930L
COMMENT. _. 9/30 LIO CKS
DATA-JE-ID DATA COMMENT
-~~~~~--~~-~~- ~-~~~~~~~~-~-~~~~~~--~~-
D-09301999-099 9/30 2ND RUN
Run Instructions:
Jobo Banner Copies Form Printer Hold Soace LPI Lines cpr
J 01 N S 6 066 10
.
.
-~--'-
ORC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
10/04/1999 10:58:27
Payments tor Pub-lication
CITY OF MONTICELLO
GL335R-V06.00 PAGE
.
Aoproved on 10/11/1999 tor Payments Throuqh 9/30/1999
Vendor Name
Description
..\mount
BERNICK'S PEPSI COLA COMPANY
DAHLHEIMER DISTRIBUTING CO
DAY DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
FLESCH'S PAPER SERVICES. INC
G & K SERVICES
GRIGGS. COOPER & COMPANY
GROSSLEIN BEVERAGE INC.
JOHNSON BROS WHOLESALE LIOUOR
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS CO
PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING
THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
WATSON COMPANY. INC/THE
LIOUOR STORE
407.80
1,733.20
3.026.15
124.'76
69.49
6.'753.34
10.725.95
19.218.10
2.299.40
237.00
11.319.70
165.45
;:; in a1 Tot a1 s . . .
56.080.34
--t'*
.
.
-- -- - -, --. -,~-- _.,-,~-,- .- ---"- -
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
10/04/1999 10:58:27
~TOTAL NUMBER OF RECORDS
~
~
--
Payments for Publication
CITY OF MONTICELLO
GL335R-V06.00 PAGE
PRINTED
26
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
10/04/1999 10:58:27
'ND RECAP:
Payments for Publication
FUND DESCRIPTION
DISBURSEMENTS
809
MUNICIPAL LIOUOR FUND
56.080.34
TOTAL ALL FUNDS
56,080.34
D.A.N 1'\ RECAP:
BANK NAME
DISBURSEMENTS
LIOR LIQUQR CHECKING
56.080.34
TOTAL ALL BANKS
56,080.34
.
.
~ ~
eRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
10/04/1999 13:08:20
Payments for Publication
CITY OF MONTICELLO
GLOSOS-V05.00 COVERPAGE
GL33SR
.
Report Selection:
Aooroval Date...................... 10/11/1999
Payments Through Date.............. 09/30/1999
Cutoff Amount to be Used...........
RUN GROUP... M930D COMMENT... 9/30 MANUAL CKS
OAT A-J E- I D
DATA COMMENT
-------------- ------------------------
M-09301999-0S2 9/30 MANUAL CHECKS
Run Instructions:
Jobo Banner Copies Form Printer Hold Soace LPI Lines CPI
J 01 N S 6 066 10
.
.
. .
SRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
10/04/1999 13:08:21
Payments for publication
CITY OF MONTICELLO
GL335R-V06.00 PAGE
~ Aoproved on 10/11/1999 for Payments Through 9/30/1999
Vendor Name
BANKVEST CAPITAL CORPORATION
BUFFALO BITUMINOUS. INC.
D & D BUS SERVICE
D-TAIL-IT
DOMINO'S PIZZA
GROSS INGER. DAWN
HARTMAN/JOSEPH A
HOGLUND TRANSPORTATION
KEARIN/WILLIAM F
MN BUILDING OFFICIAL ASSOC
MN DEPART OF NATURAL RESOURCES
MN MUNICIPAL BOARD
MN PARK SUPERVISORS ASSOC.
MONTICELLO DEPUTY REG #002
NORTHWEST MINNESOTA CHAPTER
SHUMAN/CATHY
U S POSTMASTER
WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITOR-TREAS
WRIGHT COUNTY RECORDER
WRIGHT COUNTY TREAS/AUDITOR
WSB & ASSOCIATES. INC.
~
**
.
Descri otion
RENTAL EOUP/COMM CTR
HWY 25
CIVIL DEFENSE
CAR MTC/BLD INSP
FOOD/MTG
TRAVEL EXPENSE REIMS
REIMB/PHONE BATTERIES
CIVIL DEFENSE
RIVERSIDE CEMEMARY
MEETING REG FEE/ANDERSON
DEP REG
ANNEXATION FEE/GROVELAND
1999 HAZARD TREE WKSHOP
TITLE FEES-45 TRUCK SOLD
SLOG-BIMONTHLY MEETING
CAHTY-GFOA CONFERENCE
NEWSLETTER MAILINGS
CC MANOR-REC & DEED PREP
CC MANOR-REC & DEED PREP
NOTARY FEES/LORI K
TH25 CONST SERVICES
Final Totals...
Amount
1.930.60
2.124.139.67
0.00
189.19
39.70
43.86
27.75
0.00
742.86
15.00
2.939.00
52.20
40.00
9.00
15.00
344 .95
560.00
38.30
39.00
50.00
120.674.06
2.130.699.15
- .-. -.. - -. - - .--
aRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
10/04/1999 13:08:21 Payments for Publication
~OTAL NUMBER OF RECORDS PRINTED 77
.
.
CITY OF MONTICELLO
GL335R-V06.00 PAGE
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
10/04/1999 13:08:22
t1tND RECAP:
Payments for publication
fUND DESCRIPTION
DISBURSEMENTS
---------------~------------
101 GENERAL FUND
225 PARK FUND
226 COMMUNITY CENTER
450 96-04C HWY25/MNDOT IMPR
452 97-03P KLEIN FARMS 3RD
461 9B-03C COMMUNITY CENTER
464 98-24C BOOSTER PUMP/WW RIDGE
467 98-17C CSAH 75/E BRDW IMPR
609 MUNICIPAL lIOUOR FUND
651 RIVERSIDE CEMETERY
3.879.72
7. 88
1 .930.60
2.124.139.6'1
29.33 CR
27.75
742.86
TOTAL All FUNDS
2.130.699.15
BANK RECAP:
BANK NAME
~- ----------------------------
GENl GENERAL CHECKING
lIQR lIOUOR CHECKING
DISBURSEMENTS
2.130.671.40
27.75
TOTAL All BANKS
2.130.699.15
.
-- -,~---~_. - .-
CITY OF MONTICEllO
Gl060S-V06.00 RECAP PAGE
Gl335R
---'--~ - - - --. -~ ---- - .-
"
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
10/01/1999 10:10:11
.
Payments tor Publication
Report Selection:
Anorova 'I Date......................: 0/'11/1999
Cutoff Amount to be Used........ ...
Payments Through Date.............. 09/30/oj 999
RUN GROUP... 0930
COMMENT... 9/30 CKS
DATA-JE-ID DATA COMMENT
D-09301999-098 9/30 CKS
Run Instructions:
Joba Banner Cooies Form Printer
J 01
.
.
Hold
1\1
<:::
,-,pace
r
.;J
LPI
f
CITY OF MONTICELLO
GL050S-V06.00 COVERPAGE
GL335R
Lines CPI
066 10
eRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
10/01/1999 10:10:12
.
.
Payments for
Pub') ication
Approved on 10/11/1999 for Payments Throuqh
Vendor Name
.
ASSOCIATED MERCHANT PAPER
BELLBOY CORPORATION BAR SUPPLY
BERNICK'S PEPSI COLA COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED PLASTICS
DAHLHEIMER DISTRIBUTING CO
DAVE PETERSON'S FORD-MERCURY
DNf\ FIRE CENTER
DYNA SYSTEMS
EARL F ANDERSON & ASSOCIATES
G & K SERVICES
GENERAL RENTAL CENTER
GLEN'S TRUCK CENTER
GRAINGER/W.W.
GREEN SIDE UP LAWN & TREE CARE
GRIGGS. COOPER & COMPANY
GROSSLEIN BEVERAGE INC.
HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT GROUP
HDR ENGINEERING, INC.
HERMES/GERALD T
HOLIDAY CREDIT OFFICE
JOHNSON BROS WHOLESALE LIOUOR
K MART STORE
!,\OROPCHAK/OL I VE
KRAEMER. LORI
L. "N" R SERVICES - LOCKSMITH
LASER SHARP. INC.
LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES
M.B.P.
MARCO FINANCING
MARTIE'S FARM SERVICE
MENARD, I NC
MN DEPART OF NATURAL RESOURCES
MN OEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY
MN STATE FIRE DEPARTMENT ASSOC
MONTICELLO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
MONTICELLO COMMUNITY PARTNERS
MTI DISBTRIBUTING CO.
NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS
NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY
NORTHERN TOOL & EQUIPMENT CO
NORTHWEST ASSOC CONSULTANTS
NOVAK FLECK. INC
OLSON & SONS ELECTRIC, INC.
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS CO
PIONEER
PIPELINE SUPPLY, INC.
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GROUP
PURCELL'S PLUMBERY
Descr-1otion
REFUSE
LIOUOR STORE
STREETS
FIF~E
SHOP
WILDWOOD
STREETS
PIONEER PARK
SHOP
LIBRARY
PARKS-WEED CONTROL
LIOUOR STORE
SEWER
WWTP
L I BRA,RY
FIRE-FUEL
COMM CENTER
fRAVEL EXP REIMB
PLANNING REIMB
DEP REG
DATA PROC
CH
STREETS
CH-COPIER CONTRACT
STREETS
PIONEER PARK
DEP REG
LIOUOR
FIRE
BOOTH
FESTIVAL OF COLORS
PARKS
TOM 8
WATER
PARKS
OAA PLAN
REFUND 14-0403-0001
ST LIGHTING
LIQUOR STORE
PARKS
PARKS
WWTP CONTRACT
PW
CITY OF MONTICELLO
GL335R-V06.00 PAGE
9/30/1999
,Amount
227.00
676.91
175.65
222.39
2,204.91
882.76
250.00
333.84
821.31
1.606.24
328.06
58.46
475.63
119.39
9,748.74
1.908.10
1.004.59
5,385.63
227.50
45.49
135.87
12.33
85.30
42.18
140.37
95.85
4.465.00
634.54
617.27
34.51
432.82
997.00
20.00
150.00
125.00
30.00
91 .70
560.70
'10.671 .16
2,164.34
2,757.22
23.40
247.57
5,860.10
202.35
145.47
74,190.84
188.90
.
.
.
eRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
10/01/1999 10:10:12
Payments for Publication
CITY OF MONTICELLO
GL335R-V06.00 PAGE
Accroved on 10/11/1999 for Payments Through 9/30/1999
Vendor Name
RELIANCE DATA CORPORATION
RELIANT ENERGY
RIVER BEND INDUSTRIES, INC
RL LARSON EXCAVATING, INC
RON'S GOURMET ICE
ROYAL PRINTING & OFFICE PROD
ROYAL TIRE OF MONTICELLO
SALZWEDEL/PATRICIA A.
SCHILLEWAERT LANDSCAPING, INC
SHERBURNE COUNTY RECORDER
SIMONSON LUMBER COMPANY
SIMPSON/CYNTHIA R
SOFTWARE SPECTRUM
TERRA PRODUCTS
THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
TRUEMAN-WELTERS, INC.
TRUGREEN-CHEMLAWN-MTKA
U SLINK
U S POSTMASTER
US WEST DIRECTORY ADVERTISING
VIKING COCA COLA
WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC
WATER LABORATORIES, INC
WATSON COMPANY, INC/THE
WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITOR-TREAS
WRIGHT COUNTY RECORDER
WRIGHT-HENNEPIN COOP ELEC ASSO
WSB & ASSOCIATES, INC.
ZIEGLER CAT
*""
Descriotion
DATA PROC
LIOUOR
PARKS
CSAH 75
LIOUOR STORE
PW
PARKS
AN SHELTER
SHADE TREE
SUE-NOTARY
PIONEER PARK
FIRE HALL-CLEANING
DATA PROC
RIVERSIDE CEMETARY
SHOP
PARKS-WEED CONTROL
CH
LIQUOR STORE
LIOUOR STORE
PW
REFUSE
WATER
BOHANAN FARM
KLEIN FARMS 5TH
SECURITY LIGHTS
CSAH 75
STREETS
Fina~l Tota"ls...
Amount
1,102.00
1 1 .15
199.49
313,903.23
276.96
356.30
1,114.04
1,227.43
5,697.75
25.00
236.51
50.00
407.57
215.16
3,756.10
222.05
1,491.00
109.46
33.00
33.40
110.49
5,023.51
30.00
203.61
6,169.91
90.50
21 .51
28,961.83
4,695.76
507.599.11
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
10/01/1999 10:10:12
~ TOTAL NUMBER OF RECORDS
~
.
Payments tor Publication
CITY OF MONTICELLO
GL335R-V06.00 PAGE
PRINTED
194
--
8RC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
10/01/1999 10:10:14
Payments for Publication
.
FUND RECAP:
FUND DESCRIPTION
DISBURSEMENTS
101
211
213
224
225
226
240
265
436
450
461
467
60 -1
602
609
651
GENERAL FUND
LIBRARY FUND
HRA FUND
SHADE TREE FUND
PARK FUND
COMMUNITY CENTER
CAPITAL PROJECT REVOLVING FD
WATER ACCESS FUND
93-14C WWTP EXPANSION PRJ
96-04C HWY25/MNDOT IMPR
98-03C COMMUNITY CENTER
98-17C CSAH 75/E BROW IMPR
WATER FUND
SEWER FUND
MUNICIPAL LIOUOR FUND
RIVERSIDE CEMETERY
60.593.28
1.332.88
828.91
5.640.30
7,091.77
3.89
1,315.06
264.00
5,385.63
966.50
913.77
313.906.96
4,948.90
77,389.36
26.802.74
215.16
TOTAL ALL FUN D~)
507,599.11
.
BANK RECAP:
DISBURSEMENTS
D.A,N K NAME
GENL GENERAL CHECKING
LIOR LIOUOR CHECKING
480.796.37
26.802.74
'TOT AL ALL BAN I'\S
507.599.11
.
~..--..I
f
Change Order
OWNER
ARCHITECT
CONTRACTOR
FIELD
OTHER
C3.J
La. J
[XJ
[ J
[ J
AlA Document G701 -
.Iectronic Format
THIS DOCUMENT HAS IMPORTANT LEGAL CONSEQUENCES; CONSULTATION WITH AN ATTORNEY IS ENCOURAGED WITH RESPECT TO ITS
COMPLETION OR MODIFICATION. AUTHENTICATION OF THIS ELECTRONICALLY DRAFTED AIA DOCUMENT MAY BE MADE BY USING AIA
DOCUMENT 0401.
PROJECT:
(name. address)
Monticello Community and Training Center
6th and Walnut Streets
Monticello. Mn. 55367
TO CONTRACTOR:
(name. address)
Donlar Contractors
41 Riverside Drive NE
St. Cloud. Mn. 56304
The Contract is changed as follows:
This Chanie Order No. 20 contains the followinl!: item:
CHANGE ORDER NUMBER: Twenty
DATE: AUl1ust 31. 1999
ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: 97093.00
CONTRACT DATE: November 9.1998
CONTRACT FOR: General Construction
Proposal Request No. 15. Item #1 ONLY
.ltm1JtL..... Provide fire rated extemalAYg insulation.fur...H::z....H:. Kitchen..liQQd Exhaust Ductwork. Insulation shall~ cominous
from top of hood to bottom ohoaf structure - in the amount of $18.519.
AmJa.- 'DELETE' ~Jf2..fmm Chan~e ~ Number J.2....n<furs.jQ drawin~ PR#17C-ll....Aml..:.c: Mezzanine...at west.Md...cl.
. buildini. clarify steel ~ate. OMIT $1.421.00
The total cost of this Change Order #19 is $17.098.00
AlA DOCUMENT 0701 . CHANGE ORDER. 1987 EDmON. AlA. COPYRIGHT 1987. THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARClllTECTS, 1735 NEW
YORK AVENUE, N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C., 20006-5292. WARNING; Unlicensed photocopying violates U.S. copyright laws and is subject to legal prosecution.
. document was electronically produced with pennission of the AIA and can be reproduced without violation until the date of expiration as noted below.
Electronic Format. G701-1987
. .. User Document: CHANGE -.10/8/1999. AlA License Number 108976, which expires on 12/31/1999 -- Page #1
~~~
f'
jf~'
~:~tll signed by the Owner, Architect and Contractor.
$8.204.800.00
$ 218.113.00
$.8.422.913.00
,1....
.~' (Contract Sum) ~~__.L_j u.!f' ...- n..:..J was
"ge by previously authorized Change Orders
(Contract Sum) Cr< . I J .' n') prior to this Change Order was
(Contract Sum) C'"' . ... . . - n . --} will be (increased) C . j)
by this Change Order in the amount of
";kThe new (Contract Sum) Cr<..~~-_.--" ...' . _. P' I} including this Change Order will be
1':
The ContraCt Time will be f- .~.~ - "} ~" - -- ..I~ (unchanged) by (Q) days.
The Date of Substantial Completion as of the date of this Change Order therefore is unchanied.
NOTE: This summary does not reflect changes in the Contract Sum, Contract Time or Guaranteed maximum Price which have been
authorized by Construction Change Directive.
$ 17.098.00
$8.440.011.00
OWNER
City of Monticello
Address
250 East Broadway
Monticello.Mn.55362
ARCHITECT
Ankeny Ken Architects. P .A.
Address
821 Raymond Ave.. Suite 400
S1. Paul. Mn.55114
---
BY: WIlA.~ ~ . (A~
DATE: q . L c:, .0) '\ lJ
CONTRACTOR
Donlar Contractors
Address
41 Riverside Drive NE
S1. Cloud. MD. 56304
BY: ~./
/ ./.
DATE: ,y4n
BY:
DATE:
.
AlA DOCUMENT 0701 . CHANGE ORDER. 1987 EDmaN. AlA. copYRIGHT 1987 · TIlE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECI'S, 1735 NEW
e:ORK AVENUE. N.W" WASHINGTON, D.C., 20006-5292, W ARNJNG: Unlicensed photocopying violates U.S. copyrisht laws and is subject to legal prosecution.
's document was electronically produced with permission of the AlA and can be reproduced without violation until the date of eltpiration as noted below.
", Electronic Fonnat - G701-1987
User Document: CHANGE _. 9/13/1999. AlA License Number 108976. which expires on 12131/1999.. Page #2
-'
i
./
Iposal Request
JJ-. Document G709 ..
~ctronic Format
OWNER
ARCHITECT
CONSULTANT
CONTRACTOR
FIELD
OTHER
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
THIS DOCUMENT HAS IMPORTANT LEGAL CONSEQUENCES: CONSULTATION WITH AN ATTORNEY IS ENCOURAGED WITH RESPECT TO ITS'
COMPLETION OR MODIFICATION. AUTHENTICATION OF THIS ELECTRONICALLY DRAFTED AlA DOCUMENT MAY BE MADE BY USING AlA
DOCUMENT 0401.
PROJECT:
(Name and address)
Monticello Community and Traininv Center
6th and Walnut Streets
Monticello Mn. 55362-9245
PROPOSAL REQUEST NO.: Fifteen
DATE OF ISSUANCE: Mav 19. 1999
CONTRACT FOR:
General Construction
OWNER:
(Name and address)
Cirv Qf Monticello
250 East Broadwav
Monticello Mn. 55362-9245
CONTRACT DATED: November 9. 1998
TO CONTRACTOR.:
(Name and address)
Donlar Contractors
41 Riverside Drive NE
Sf. Cloud. Mn. 56304
ARCHITECI"S PROJECT NUMBER: 97093.00
ARCHITECT:
(Name and address)
Ankenv Kell Architects
821 Raymond Ave. Suite 400
St. Paul. Mn 55114
.e submit an itemized proposal for changes in the Contract Sum and Contract Time for proposed modifications to the Contract
ments described herein. Submit proposal within .lQ days, or notify the Architect in writing of the date on which you
anticipate submitting your proposal,
THIS IS NOT A CHANGE ORDER, CONSTRUCTION CHANGE DIRECTIVE OR A DIRECTION TO PROCEED WITH THE
WORK DFSrRTBED 1N THF. PROPOSED MOnTFTrATTONS
Description:
(Insert a written description o/the Work.)
~JtL_ ~~v~~e ofi:::d ~::'7:~uct :n~u~~~~ ~o~ 14"x 14" Kitchen Hood Exhaust Ductwork. Insulation.sh~l be continuous
from top 0 0 t 0 cmr . n 0 hall be manufacmred bv "Fire Master". "Thermal Ceramics or equal.
I!ml.!2.._..Ara~~~~~JQ.Ldmn:.ii.!2~~-..in~.lIl!1 the two.ill covers for the handic~pped openers in
Vestibule C133 are also to be 'white' in color to match the interior side of the adiacent aluminum entrance frames,
Item #3. Area 'A', Gymnasium AIDD. Remove the cross brid~M at the Ion!! span roof joists at the location of the ductwork. Install
!hi< ductwork and reinstall brid~n~Jn a horizontal position at the top..m1d bottom chords. This.,gn.mm: be accomplished afterJrn;..
roof load is fully aDplied.
~~ #4. ~~ ~~~ ~o;;k,,:~; :: ~l~ ~r:r~4") ~i,*" "".n=re block sectinns tn. f"?,, . base under tbelocker sections,
coner I ecelV .. led a1Ot" e 1010t between the ceramIC tIle floor and the concrete block base
is to receive a bead of "Silicone Sealant" ,
Attachments:
(List attached documents that support ikscription.)
No drawinws issued with this Proposal Request.
eOCUMENT G709 . PROPOSAL REQUEST - 1993 EDmaN - AlA - COPYRIGHT 1993 · THE AMERICAN INsmurE OF ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW
. _' AVENUE. N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C., 20CJ06..S292. WARNING: Unliccnsed photocopying violates U.S. copyright Jaws and is subject to legal prosecution.
This document was elcctronically produced with permission of the AlA and can be r~produced without violation until the date of expiration as noted below.
Electronic Format G709 - 1993
User Document PR15.DOC - 5/18/1999. AlA License Number 108976, which expires on 12/31/1999 -- Page #1