City Council Agenda Packet 09-27-1999
.
4.
.
~
R#o~ B.
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING ~ MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL
Monday, September 27,1999 - 7 p.m.
Mayor: Roger Bclsaas
Council Members: Clint Herbst, Brian Stumpf, Roger Carlson, Bruce Thielen
1. Call to order.
2.
A.
Approval of minutes of the regular meeting held September 13, 1999.
,.,
.J.
5.
Consideration of adding items to the agenda.
A. !::r(2.U(N(r- e ?')Q.vv {2tJ'Ic..(!T'P€"" riJr
B.
C.
Citizens comments/petiti.ons\requests, and c.omplaints. C .rt,~r~ '"' /&~:~~S) ~~f
f7oW'1~ b~ - ~\o..l^"\.t(i AAo~t-Go.).l~ ~ (f<lJfV'O>-
Consent agenda. '\ ~2- of v-4rv(r I;' /(" I
( rlj)
A. Consideration of a resolution establishing various fees and charges relating to
licensing of tattoo/body piercing establishments.
Consideration of approving a three (3) month membership fee for the Monticello
Community Center and approving a Combined Membership plan and fees
between Life Fitness Centers and MCC.
C.
Consideration to approve Business Subsidy Agreement between the EDA and
Aroplax Corporation for GMEF Loan No. 016.
6. Consideration of items removed from the consent agenda for discussion.
7. Public hearing - Consideration of issuing an on-sale liquor license - Monticello Country
Club.
8. Public Hearing - Consideration to adopt a resolution authorizing application to DTED for
funding an economic development project.
9. Consideration of a conditional use permit allowing a commercial planned unit
development and a conditional use permit allowing outside sales.
.
10.
Consideration of an offer to purchase City owned parcel adjacent to newly created
Chelsea Road.East between TH/Cedar Street.
.
.
.
Agenda
Monticello City Council
September 27, 1999
Page Two
11. Consideration of an ordimmce amendment regulating solicitors, peddlers and transient
merchants.
12. Consideration of establishing a process for the sale of senior citizens facility.
13. Approve payment of bi lis.
14. Adjourn
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL
. Monday, September 13,1999 -7 p.m.
Members Present: Roger Bclsaas, Roger Carlson, Clint Ilerbst, Brian Stumpf and
Bruce Thielen.
Members Absent: None
Mayor Belsaas called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. and declared a quorum present.
2.A Approval of minutes ofthe reuular meeting of August 23.1999
On the motions for items #8 and #11 it was noted that the minutes should have read Roger Carlson.
BRIAN STUMPF MOVED '1'0 APPROVE THE AMENDED MINUTES OF THE REGULAR
MEETING OF AUGUST 23, 1999. ROGER CARLSON SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION
CARRIED WITH BRUCE THIELEN ABSTAINING.
2.B Approval of the minutes of the special meetinu of Au~ust 23. 1999.
.
ROGER CARLSON MOVED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF
AUGUST 23, 1999. CLINT HERBST SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED WITH
BRUCE THIELEN ABSTAINING.
2.C Approval ofthe minutes ofthe special meetin~ of September 7. 1999.
CLINT lIERBST MOVED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999. BRUCE THIELEN SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED
WITH BRIAN STUMPF ABSTAINING.
3. Consideration of addine items to the auenda.
BRIAN STUMPF MOVED THAT AGENDA ITEM # 11 (CONSIDERA nON OF AUTHORIZING
CITY MAINTENANCE OF SCHOOL BOULEVARD ADJACENT TO THE STORMW A TER
PONDS BETWEEN EIDER LANE AND PELICAN LANE) BE MOVED TO THE CONSENT
AGENDA AS ITEM 5M. CLINT HERBST SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED
UNANIMOUSL Y.
4. Citizen comments/petitions. reQuests and complaints.
Susan Menzel of Big Lake representing the Monticello Women of Today came before the Council
with a request to proclaim September 19-25, 1999 as Women of Today Week.
.
;}A
~.,.-
.
.
.
Council Meeting - 09/13/99
BRUCE THIELEN MOVED TO AUTHORIZE TilE MAYOR TO PROCLAIM SEPTEMBER 19-25,
1999 AS WOMEN OF TODAY WEEK. CLINT I-IERBST SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Glenn Posusta, Amax Storage camc before the Council to express his concern about the signage on thc
'Ill 2S I mprovement Project and submitted a letter from Dean Rasmussen of Glass Hut who also had
concerns about the signage. They indicated that there were no signs placed that indicated how traffic
was to access their businesses sincc normal access was disrupted by the road construction. Brett Weiss
of WS R indicated that there should be signs for these properties and that hc would take care of the
matter.
5. Consent Al!enda
A. Consideration of adopting resolution approving a Drug and Alcohol Testing Policy for
the City of Monticcllo/l-leartland Express. Recommendation: Adopt a resolution
accepting the City of Monticello/Heartland Express Drug and Alcohol Policy for the
year 2000. (RES. #99-51)
B. Consideration of Rcsolution supporting a fee increase for Deputy Rcgistrar.
Recommendation: Adopt a resolution supporting attempts to increase the fees for
Deputy Registrar transactions. (RES.# 99-50)
C.
Consideration to modify the EDA Business Subsidy Criteria/Greater Monticello
Enterprisc Fund (GMEF) Guidelines. Recommendation: Approve the
recommendations to modify the GMEF Guidelines as recommended by the EDA.
D. Consideration to review Greater Monticello Enterprise Fund (GMEF) Loan No. 016
(Schoen Properties Limited Partnership) for compliancc with the EDA-GMEF
Business Subsidy Criteria. Recommendation: Approve a motion stating that the City
Council has determined the EDA approval ofGMEF Loan No. 016 for Schoen
Properties Limited Partnership was approved without violation of the EDA-GMEF
Business Subsidy Criteria, and therefore, the Council supports the decision by the
EDA for loan approval.
E. Consideration of a request for a final planned unit development permit within the CCD
Zoning District to allow a mixed use feed and rctail operation. Applicant: Little
Mountain Feed. Recommendation: Approve the final stage PUD subject to the
conditions in Exhibit Z and based on a finding that the proposal meets the intcnt of the
CCD District and previous development stage PUD approval.
F.
Consideration of granting a conditional use permit allowing a small expansion to
Hawks Sports Bar and Grill. Recommendation: Approve a conditional use pcrmit
allowing expansion of a restaurant in a B-3 zone contingent on meeting rcquirements
outlined in Exhibit Z. Motion based on the find that the expansion under the
2
.
.
Council Meeting - 09/13/99
conditions listed will upgrade the area and will not result in a negative impact on the
nearby residential area.
G.
Consideration of concept and development stage residential planned unit development
consisting offive 12 unit apartments. Recommendation: Motion to approve the
revised concept stage PUD subject to the conditions listed in the original staff report
as well as the additional recommendations made in Exhibit Z and a motion to approve
the development stage PUD subject to the recommendations in Exhibit Z.
H.
Consideration of an application for renewal of an interim use permit allowing a public
school use in an I-I Zone. Recommendation: Approve the issuance of an interim use
permit to the Monticello School District to operate an alternative school program at
1248 Oakwood Drive East subject to the findings that the proposed use will not
interfere with the City's long range objectives to encourage industrial development in
the area and subject to the following conditions:
I. The interim use permit will expire on August 31,200 I. Extension of the use of the subject property for
public school use beyond the termination date may only be allowed by re-applieation to the City.
2. The District agrees to expand the parking area at the direction of the City. The City will direct expanded
parking based on its observation of parking demand which may cause the use of on-street parking at any
time.
3.
The use of the subject property will be during normal school hours only.
4. The granting of this interim use permit shall not be effective until after inspection and approval ofthe
building and property by the City Building Omcial.
1. Consideration of establishing park dedication requirements for multi-family
developments and establishing a policy implementing pathway development fund.
Recommendation: Adopt an ordinance amendment establishing the park and trail
dedication fee and establishing the fee at $950/housing unit. ORD. AMD. NO. 331.
J. Item pulled from the agenda.
K. Review of proposals for Riverside Cemetery caretaker and consideration of award of
contract. Recommendation: Moved to approve a contract with Mr. Bill Kearin for
caretaker services at the Riverside Cemetery for $325/month.
L. Consideration of amending the City of Monticello Liquor Ordinance to allow
dispensing of intoxicating liquor at the Monticello Community Center.
Recommendation: Approve adoption of the MN State Statute 340A.404
Subdivision 4 and incorporation into the Liquor Ordinance for the City of Monticello
with the amendments as written. ORD. AMD. NO. 332.
.
M.
Consideration of authorizing City maintenance of School Boulevard adjacent to
stormwater ponds between Eider Lane and Pelican Lane. Recommendation: Move to
3
.
.
.
Counci I Meeting - 09/13/99
authorize city staff to mow boulevard areas isolated from private residences by
stormwater pond along School Boulevard. Motion to include the requirement that the
affected property owners continue to keep the side slopes free from noxious weeds.
However grasses can be allowed to grow higher than six inches. (Was agenda item #11)
CLINT HERBST MOVED TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS SA-SM.
BRUCE THIELEN SECONDED TIlE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
6. Consideration of items removed from the consent agenda for discussion.
None
7. Public hearing - Consideration to adopt City criteria for awardin2 business subsidies.
The purpose of the public hearing was to meet the requirements of State Statute Section 116J.993-116J-994
relating to criteria for awarding business subsidies. Ollie Koropchak informed the Council that a revised
draft of the criteria which contained some minor changes as recommended by the HRA attorney was being
submitted to the Council.
Mayor Belsaas opened the public hearing on the adoption of criteria for awarding business subsidies. No
one came forward to speak for or against the proposed criteria. Mayor Belsaas then closed the public
hearing.
CLINT HERBST MOVED TO ADOPT THE SECOND DRAFT OF THE BUSINESS SUBSIDY
CRITERIA FOR THE CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA AS PRESENTED. ROGER CARLSON
SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
8. Public Hearing - Consideration of a resolution authorizill!! a tax rate increase.
City Administrator, Rick Wolfsteller, informed the Council that if the City was looking at a budget or tax
levy that would result in a tax increase, the City must adopt a resolution authorizing a tax rate increase.
The passing of the resolution does not necessarily mean that the City will increase their tax rate but it is a
safety measure to allow for changes caused by market value adjustments that might affect the tax rates.
Mayor Belsaas opened the public hearing. No one came forward to speak for or against the resolution.
Mayor Belsaas then closed the public hearing.
BRIAN STUMPF MOVED TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION WHICH INDICATES THAT A TAX RATE
FOR THE 1999 LEVY COLLECTIBLE IN THE YEAR 2000 MAYBE HIGHER THAN THE TAX
RA TE LEVIED FOR 1999. CLINT HERBST SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED
UNANIMOUSL Y. (RES. #99-49)
9.
Consideration of resolution adoptin2 the preliminary 2000 budget and tax levv.
4
Council Meeting - 09/13/99
.
City Administrator, Rick Wolf:'iteller, summarized the work to date on the budget and tax levy. The
preliminary hudget and tax levy up for Council approval reflected the Council direction that there be no
more than a 5% increase from last year. Preliminary figures from Wright County indicate that the City
should see a slight increase in valuation. Ilowever, until the City gets firm numbers from the County it is
difficult to say how the tax levy would affect a particular type of property. Rick Wolfsteller reiterated that
by adopting this levy amount this would be the maximum amount the City could levy. They could always
go lower than this amount but they could not increase it. The City could add $360,000 to the budget
amount and still meet levy requirements. It was pointed out that with a proposed future bond sale a portion
of the levy would be earmarked for bond debt payments. Contributions to outside agencies and other items
will he discussed at future budget workshops to be scheduled prior to the adoption of the final budget.
At this time the Council is also required to set a date for the hearing on the budget and tax levy. It was
suggested that the hearing be scheduled for Wednesday, December 8, 1999 at 5:00 with the final budget to
be adopted at the regular Council meeting on December 13, 1999.
CLINT HERBST MOVED TO ADOPT THE PRELIMINARY BUDGET AND TAX LEVY AS
PREVIOUSL Y DISCUSSED SETTING THE LEVY AT $4,848,611,5% HIGHER THAN 1999 AND TO
SET WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 8,1999 AT 5:00 P.M. AS THE DATE FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING
ON THE BUDGET. BRIAN STUMPF SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED
UNANIMOUSL Y. (RES. #99-48)
10.
Consideration of a reQuest for rezoning from R-l (Sinele family) to A-a (Agricultural-
apenSpace) and a conditional use permit within the A-a Zoning District to allow a eolf
course and club house. Aoplicant: Monticello Country Club.
.
The change in zoning from R-1 to A-O would make the golf course a conforming use and would allow the
existing use to be expanded. Deputy City Administrator, Jeff O'Neill reviewed Planning Commission
action on this request and reviewed the five conditions of the conditional use permit.
Clint Herbst asked about the provision for curb and gutter. The Planning Commission will be reviewing
this and if there is justification for not including curb and gutter as part of this request it would come back at
a later date for approval. Clint Herbst noted that if the curb and gutter requirement is waived there should be
a valid reason for doing so. However, at this time the applicant is proceeding as if curb and gutter is being
required.
Represcntatives of the Monticello Country Club werc present and stated that they had met with neighboring
property owners regarding the buffer between the golf course and adjacent properties. Some owners
favored buffering while others preferred viewing the golf course. The Monticello Country Club will try to
find a plan that will provide a balance betwecn the two views. The Council also reviewed the parking space
requirements and access.
.
CLINT HERBST MOVED TO APPROVE THE REZONING FROM R-1 TO A-O BASED ON A
FINDING THAT THE GOLF COURSE BETTER MEETS THE INTENT OF THIS DISTRICT AND
THA T THE FUTURE LAND USE OF THIS AREA IS BETTER PROTECTED BY AN A-O ZONING
5
.
.
.
Council Meeting - 09/13/99
DESIGNATiON. BRUCE THIELEN SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED
UNANIMOUSL Y. (ORD AMD. #333)
BRIAN STUMPF MOVED TO APPROVE THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT BASED ON A
FINDING TlIAT THE PROPOSAL MEETS THE STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO THIS USE AND
SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
I. Compliance with all performance standards of the City's Zoning Ordinance including parking
lot development.
2. Review and approval of a drainage plan by the City Engineer.
3. Expansion of the parking lot to a minimum of 139 spaces, as recommended in the Planning
Commission report.
4. Subm ission of a landscaping plan which buffers the neighboring residential development
(Monticello Country Club Court) from the parking area and the maintenance building activity,
in conformance with the City's landscaping and buffering requirements.
5. Staff has the opportunity to review the maintenance building plans for the purpose of evaluating
exterior design compatibility with nearby buildings.
ROGER CARLSON SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
11.
Consideration of authorizing City maintenance of School Boulevard adjacent to
stormwater ponds between Eider Lane and Pelican Lane.
This item was moved to the consent agenda as Item 5M.
12. Consideration of reviewinc bids for Chelsea Road and Walnut Street Improvement and
award of contract.
Mike Nielson from WSB reviewed the bid results with the Council. The first time the project was bid the
Council rejected the bids because they were high. This time the bids carne in $47,000 less than the last time
the project was bid. The engineer's estimate for the Walnut Street portion of the project was $165,000.
Mayor BeIsaas asked if better unit prices could be obtained if the City waited until spring. Several
members of the Council expressed concern about having another street torn up.
The engineer also reviewed the costs for the Chelsea Road project which was bid as part of the
Walnut Street project. The total estimated cost, including indirect costs for engineering, legal, etc. carne to
approximately $628,000. Mike Nielsen noted several items unique to the project and how they impacted
project costs. These included removal of 4" of topsoil over the project area, reconstruction of the Cedar
Street/Chelsea Road intersection and the use of prestressed concrete pipe to match the existing pipe.
The Council discussed whether or not to proceed with both projects. The consensus of the Council was that
the City needed to proceed with the Chelsea Road portion of the project now. John Simola, Public Works
Director stated he would like to see the City do the Walnut Street project at this time. He was concerned
about the lack of drainage on Walnut Street and pointed out parking concerns as well. He added that the
6
.
.
.
Council Meeting - 09/13/99
blacktop surface of Walnut Street is only 2" or 2 W' and he felt that the blacktop could be broken up pretty
badly by spring. Bruce Thielen added that the City had no assurance that by re-bidding the project, the unit
prices would be any better. Mike Nielsen stated that the street closing for Walnut Street would be
primarily for the installation of the paver block at the crosswalk. Otherwise the driving lanes would be
narrowed when curb and gutter would be installed but the street would be passable.
BRUCE THIELEN MOVED TO APPROVE A RESOLUTION A WARDING TIlE CONTRACT FOR
BOTH WALNUT STREET, CITY PROJECT NO.98-13C AND CHELSEA ROAD EAST, CITY
PROJECT NO. 98-08C TO BUFFALO BITUMINOUS IN THE AMOUNT OF $694,301.50 WITH THE
UNDERSTANDING THAT THE CITY WOULD DELAY THE PAVER WORK FOR THE
CROSSWALK UNTIL SPRING. CLINT HERBST SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED
WITH BRIAN STUMPF VOTING IN OPPOSITION. (RES. #99-52)
13. Consideration of approving Groveland preliminary plat and adopting a ioint resolution
supportine: annexation for Phase I of the Groveland plat.
The Planning Commission reviewed this plat at their July and August meeting and
recommended approval with conditions including submittal of a phasing plan, sidewalk along the UP A
easement and extension of sidewalk from Chelsea Road to the residential area. Also the EA W process must
be completed and Wright County Soil Conservation District must give approval to the wetland impact
mitigation plan. When the proposal carne before the Planning Commission a portion of the development
was proposed for multi-family. At the time the proposal was submitted to the MOAA Board the area that
was proposed for multi-family was changed to commercial which the MOAA Board agreed to.
The Council discussed access to the proposed development. It is proposed to start construction of the
residential phase of the development this fall. The City Engineer noted a temporary road is shown as
coming into the site. Clint Herbst suggested that certificate of occupancy not be issued for any homes in the
development until Chelsea Road was complete. Brett Weiss, City Engineer indicated the temporary road
would be paved so access to the site during the construction phase would be fairly good.
Phase I is the boundary of the legal description in the annexation resolution. If a road was cut into the
development it would run through land in the township and not included in the legal description of the
annexation area. John Simola suggested that the road be platted as part of the first phase. Any proposal for
the road through township land would have to go back to the MOAA.
BRUCE THIELEN MOVED TO GRANT PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL TO THE
GROVELAND RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING
CONDITIONS:
1. Developer must submit a phasing plan which facilitates access to the westerly point on Chelsea Road as
early as possible.
2. Pathway located along the UPA easement should be shifted to the parallel right-of-way as sidewalk.
3.
City Council must make a negative declaration of impact as a result of the environmental assessment
review process.
7
.
.
.
Council Meeting - 09/13/99
4.
Wright County Soil Conservation District must review and approve the wetland impact mitigation plan.
5.
Approval of sewer, water and final plan by the City Engineer and Public Works Director.
6. That Chelsea Road be platted as part of Phase I or deeded to the City.
CLINT HERBST SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
In further discussion, Mike Gair representing the developer indicated that he would be in contact with the
MOAA Board regarding the access issue. He noted that the original petition covered 255 acres and that was
reduced down to cover only the area covered in Phase 1. Mike Gair indicated that the developer would
prefer to sec the road costs going to the Chelsea Road construction rather than to the construction of a
temporary road.
BRUCE THIELEN MOVED TO APPROVE A JOINT RESOLUTION SUPPORTING ANNEXATION
OF THE GROVELAND PLAT CON'fINGENT UPON ANNEXATION OF LAND NECESSARY TO
CONSTRUCT ROAD ACCESS AS NEEDED TO SUPPORT PHASE I DEVELOPMENT AND THAT IT
MEET TOWNSHIP REQUIREMENTS AS WELL. ROGER CARLSON SECONDED THE MOTION.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. (RES. #99-53)
14. Consideration of approving plans and specifications and authorizine advertisement for
bids for West Bridge Park Lift Station Improvement.
The engineers estimate for the project is $225,000 not including the generator, alarm system or
off-street parking. The Park Board was supportive of getting the lift station done so that park
development could occur but the parking improvements were not critical to their development
plans.
BRIAN STUMPF MOVED TO APPROVE THE PLANS AND SPECIFICA nONS PRESENTED BY
THE CITY ENGINEER FOR THE WEST PARK LIFT ST A nON IMPROVEMENT WHICH DOES NOT
INCLUDE THE GENERATOR, ALARM SYSTEM OR OFF-STREET PARKING IMPROVEMENTS.
BRUCE THIELEN SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. (RES.#99-54)
15. Consideration of an offer to purchase City owned parcel adjacent to re-alie:ned Chelsea
Road - Dan Mielke.
Previously the Council directed that this parcel be advertized for sale. As a result of the advertisement, the
City did receive a couple of inquiries. An ofTer was submitted to the City by Dave Peterson. Dan Mielke
who had also submitted an offer to the City was present and eXplained the basis for his proposal. The
Council felt that tabling this item would allow the parties involved some additional time to firm up and
clarify their proposals.
BRIAN STUMPF MOVED TO TABLE ACTION ON THE SALE OF THE CITY OWNED PARCEL TO
ALLOW ALL PARTIES ADDITIONAL TIME TO PREPARE PROPOSALS AND OFFERS. CLINT
HERBST SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
8
.
.
.
Council Meeting ~ 9/13/99
16.
Consideration of a zoning text amendment to allow external illuminated projecting wall
signs. Applicant: City of Monticello.
The Council reviewed the proposed ordinance amendment to allow externally illuminated projecting wall
signs. This amendment would apply to the Broadway area of the CCD. It was proposed that the
projecting wall signs would be limited to one sign per business and two signs per building. Susie
Wojchouski from DAT submitted pictures for Council review depicting dilTerent examples of the projecting
wall signs. If the Council approves the ordinance amendment, applications for projecting signs in the CCD
would be reviewed by DA 1'. In reviewing the ordinance amendment, the Council felt language should be
added to specify that projecting wall signs could not advertise a specific product.
BRUCE THIELEN MOVED TO APPROVE THE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT ALLOWING
PROJECTING WALL SIGNS IN THE CCD DISTRICT WITH THE RESTRICTION THAT
PROJECTING WALL SIGNS CANNOT ADVERTIZE A SPECIFIC PRODUCT. CLINT HERBST
SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. (ORD. AMD. #334)
17. Approve pavment of bills for September.
BRUCE THIELEN MOVED TO APPROVE PAYMENT OF BILLS. BRIAN STUMPF
SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
BRUCE THIELEN MOVED TO ADJOURN AT 9: 15 PM. CLINT HERBST SECONDED THE
MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Recording Secretary
9
. Applicant Type:
_Individual (Complete pages 1 and 4)
_Partnership (Complete pages 1,2 and 4)
_Corporation (Complete pages 1,3 and 4)
/Business Name: I
(Attach certified copy of certificate as required by Minnesota Statutes 33301)
Business Address:
Legal Description:
If construction or alterations are planned for the property, preliminary plans must be furnished to the City
Real estate and personal property taxes on this premise current? ( ) Yes ( ) No (If not please list amounts due)
MN Tax 10#
Applicant Name:
Date of Birth: Place of Birth:
Residence Address:
Telephone Number:
U.S. Citizen: ( ) Yes ( ) No Social Security No.:
Have you ever used or been known by another name? If so, list name and dates and places where used:
. Street addresses of applicant's residence for preceding five years:
The type, name and location of every business or occupation in which applicant has been engaged during the
preceding five years and the name(s) and address(es) of the applicant's employer(s) and partner(s), if any,
for the preceding five years:
Have you ever been convicted of a felony, crime, or violation of any ordinance other than a petty misdemeanor?
( ) Yes ( ) No If yes, furnish information relative to the time, place and offense for conviction(s). This question
must be answered by each individual, partner and corporate officer; attach separate sheet if necessary.
Do you currently hold a tattooing license from any other governmental unit?
. Have you ever been denied a tattooing license from any other governmental unit?
Forms.xls:Tattoo Lie. App.:9/7/99
SA
.
Complete this page if the business is a partnership. Information must be provided on all general, limited partners
and managing partners.
Partner Name: Financial Interest %
Date of Birth: Place of Birth:
Residence Address:
U.S. Citizen: ( ) Yes ( ) No Social Security No.:
Partner Name: Financial Interest %
Date of Birth: Place of Birth:
Residence Address:
U.S. Citizen: ( ) Yes ( ) No Social Security No.:
Partner Name:
Date of Birth:
Residence Address:
U.S. Citizen: ( ) Yes ( ) No
Financial Interest %
Place of Birth:
Social Security No.:
Partner Name: Financial Interest %
Date of Birth: Place of Birth:
Residence Address:
U.S. Citizen: ( ) Yes ( ) No Social Security No.:
Partner Name: Financial Interest %
Date of Birth: Place of Birth:
Residence Address:
Attach a true copy of the partnership agreement to the application. If the partnership is required to file a certificate
as to a trade name pursuant to statutes, section 333.01, a certified copy of such certificate must also be
attached to the application.
.
Forms.xls:Tattoo Lic. App.:9/7/99
2
.
Complete this page if the business is a corporation. Information must be provided on all officers. Also list
name(s) of stockholder(s), manager(s), propritor(s), or other agent(s) in charge of the business.
CORPORATION NAME:
STATE OF INCORPORATION:
Officer Name:
Date of Birth: Place of Birth:
Residence Address:
Telephone Number:
U.S. Citizen ( ) Yes ( ) No Social Security No.:
Officer Name:
Date of Birth: Place of Birth:
Residence Address:
Telephone Number:
U.S. Citizen ( ) Yes ( ) No Social Security No.:
Officer Name:
Date of Birth:
Residence Address:
Telephone Number:
U.S. Citizen ( ) Yes ( ) No
Place of Birth:
Social Security No.:
Officer Name:
Date of Birth: Place of Birth:
Residence Address:
Telephone Number:
U.S. Citizen ( ) Yes ( ) No Social Security No.:
Officer Name:
Date of Birth: Place of Birth:
Residence Address:
Telephone Number:
U.S. Citizen ( ) Yes ( ) No Social Security No.:
Attach a true copy of the certificate of incorporation. If the applicant is a foreign corporation, a certificate of
authority as required by Section 303.06 must be attached to the application.
.
Forms.xls:Tattoo Lic App.:9/7/99
3
. "I hereby certify that the foregoing statements are true to the best of my knowledge."
Signature of Applicant
Date
CERTIFICATE OF ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
(for use when business individual or partnership)
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF
On this day of ,19_, before me personally appeared
, to me personally known to be the person descirbed in and who executed the foregoing
instrument and acknowledge that _he executed the same as the free act and deed of the individual.
(notarial seal)
CERTIFICATE OF ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
(for use when business is a Corporation)
. STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF
On this day of , 19_ before me personally appeared
and , to me personally known who, being duly sworn, each did say that they are
respectively the and
of , that the seal affixed to the foregoing instrument is the corporate seal of said
corporation; and that said instrument was executed on behalf of the corporation by authority of its Board of
Directors and said and
acknowledge the instrument to be the free act and deed of the corporation.
Notary Public
(notarial seal)
Issuing Authority Approval:
Sheriffs Department:
Health Department:
Zoning Department:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Forms.xls:Tattoo Lic. App.:9/7/99
4
.
.
.
Council Agenda - 09/27/99
SA.
Consideration of a resolution establishine various fees and eharees relating to
licensing of tattoo /bodv viercing establishments. (R W.)
A. RKFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
On August 23rd, the City Council adopted a new ordimmce amendment allowing body piercing
establishments and tattoo parlors as permitted uses in a B-4 District. The ordinance also
specified the licensing procedures that these establishments would have to meet in order to obtain
a license. The ordinance requires that the Council pass a resolution adopting fees for the license.
The new ordinance indicates that three fees can be charged including an application fee, an
investigative fee and the actual license fee. Two other communities have similar ordinances,
New Hope and Lakeville, and in checking with them, the fees they currently charge are as
follows:
Lakeville:
- Application Fee
- License Fee (includes inspection costs)
-Investigative Fee (one time only)
$300.00
$300.00
$350.00
A separate license fee is required if body piercing is also done.
New Hope:
License Fee
Investigative (City part only)
$300.00
$400.00
Based on the survey, it is recommended that the fee schedule for Monticello be as follows:
Application Fee
Investigative Fee
License Fee
$300.00
$350.00 (City portion only)
$300.00
The above fee for a license is for a tattoo parlor or body piercing and if both services are
requested, the fee would be doubled. In addition, the Wright County Public Nurse indicated that
if the County served as the City's health inspection authority for these establishments, any
inspections conducted by the County would be billed separately to the applicant. It is also
possible that Wright County will soon adopt its own ordinance that could be more restrictive than
the City's.
Although we do not currently have any applicant waiting to apply for either of these
establishments, the Council should adopt the resolution establishing the fees.
H.
ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
I. The Council could adopt the resolution establishing the fees for tattoo/body
piercing establishments as follows:
.
.
.
Council Agenda - 09/27/99
Application Fee
Investigation Fee
License Fee
$300.00
$350.00
$300.00 (each)
2. Council could adopt a different fee schedule.
c. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is the recommendation of the City Administrator that the fees be established as recommended
under Alternative #1. The fees are in line with those of other communities who have similar
ordinances.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
. Copy of resolution
· Application Form
.
.
.
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING VARIOUS FEES AND CHARGES
RELA TING TO LICENSING OF TATTOO/BODY PIERCING ESTABLISHMENTS
WHEREAS, the City of Monticello passed Ordinance No. 329 which establishes licensing
procedures for tattoo/body piercing establishments and directs that fees for the license be set by
Council resolution; and
WHEREAS, the City of Monticello intends to charge fees for the license in order cover the cost
of reviewing and processing the license application,
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF MONTICELLO:
The following fees are hereby established for licenses for tattoo parlors or body piercing
establishments:
Application Fee
Investigation Fee
Li eense Fee
$300
$350 (City part only)
$300
ADOPTED this
day of
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Administrator
sP\
.
5.B. Consideration of approvin2 a three (3) month membership fee for the Monticello
Community Center and approvin2 a Combined Membership plan between Life
Fitness Centers and the Monticello Community Center. (K.B.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
Three (3) Month Fun Pass:
The three (3) month Fun Pass would be a full membership opportunity for the users of the
Community Center. Our current fee schedule only allows pass uses for specific areas ofthe
Community Center (i.e. pool pass, skate park pass, etc.) or a twelve (12) month membership
option. It was felt that some members may want an all inclusive short-term membership option.
Reminder, the climbing wall and the skate park are not included as part of the annual membership
and would not be included in the Fun Pass either. The Small Group has evaluated and approved
this fee amount and recommended bringing it to the City Council for final approval. (See full
schedule offees approved including proposed Fun Pass)
.
Combined Membership - Life Fitness Centers and Monticello Community Center:
Todd Swanson, owner of Life Fitness Centers, and I have worked to prepare a membership
option that would allow for a combined membership to Life Fitness Centers and the Monticello
Community Center under one monthly fee. There were some internal details that required quite a
bit of consideration to make this a viable option. We needed to determine a fair monthly payment
amount, how the billing process would work, contracts for membership, the cancellation process
and the collection process. We believe that the program we're recommending will be the easiest
for Life Fitness Centers and for the Community Center to manage. The most important issue for
both of us is good customer service and a positive experience for the members. Below is the table
of fees and how the membership will work:
Regular Rate Resident Rate
Monthly payment for 12 months Monthly payment for 12 months
Junior / Senior 33.75 30.00
Single 47.25 43.50
Family 69.75 66.00
.
Membership Information:
1. Term of membership will be 12 months - to run date to date
2. Monthly payment would be required through electronic funds transfer (EFT) on the 10th of
the month
3. The first months payment would be due at signing
4. Combined membership allows full membership status, as defined by LFC and MCC
policies, to Life Fitness Centers in Monticello, Buffalo and Zimmerman and the Monticello
Community Center.
5. Members will be given one membership card with one common membership number to be
used at both facilities.
6. Cancellation of membership would require a $50 cancellation fee and any past due
amounts.
7. EFT files would be managed by Life Fitness Centers. The Community Center would pay a
small administration charge for cost to LFC for this.
8.
9.
Infonnation will be relayed daily to ensure full facility use by the new member.
There will be no monthly bills generated due to the EFT payment plan, however LFC will
manage the account initially ifan EFT request is NSF. Ifa membership needs to be
canceled due to nonpayment, the collection process would be the responsibility ofthe
facility where the member signed up.
MCC would like to offer this option at the same time that Charter Memberships are sold.
.
10.
The Small Group has reviewed the Combined Membership program on two occasions and have
approved the fees and the program details. They are excited about offering a combined
membership that will be successful for Life Fitness Centers and the Monticello Community Center
and very appealing to the general public. They recommended that it be brought the City Council
for final approval.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. The first alternative would be to approve the three (3) month Fun Pass and the Combined
Membership program as written.
2. The second alternative would be to approve either the three (3) month Fun Pass or the
Combined Membership program and return the other for further review and reworking.
3. The third alternative would be to not approve either the three (3) month Fun Pass or the
Combined Membership program and send it back to City stafffor reworking.
. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is the recommendation of the City Administrator that the City Council approve the three (3)
month Fun Pass and the Combined Membership program as written.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Full fee matrix which includes the three (3) month Fun Pass.
.
.
Monticello Community Center
Membership Options and Rates
Resident - Residence within the city limits of Monticello
Regular - Residence outside the city limits of Monticello
Included in membership: Gymnasium, resistance equipment, cardiovascular equipment, walk/jog track, pool,
pool slide (when open) indoor playground, locker rooms and fitness classes.
Membership Daily Pass Annual Pass Annual Pass Annual Pass Annual Pass Fun Pass
Options Monthly Quarterly Semi. Paid in Full 3 Month
Payment Payment Annual Pass
Payment Paid in Full
Re2ular
Jr/Sr 4.00 22.00 64.00 124.00 240.00 69.00
Single 5.50 30.00 85.00 160.00 300.00 90.00
Family 20.00 35.00 10.00 190.00 360.00 105.00
Residen t
Ir/Sr 3.00 17.00 49.00 94.00 180.00 54.00
Single 3.50 25.00 70.00 130.00 240.00 75.00
Family 15.00 30.00 85.00 160.00 300.00 90.00
Junior (Jr)
Individual between the ages of 14 and 17 years of age. Requires proof of age and parent or
guardian signature on contract.
Individual 55 years of age or older. Requires proof of age.
Individual between and including the ages of 18 and 54.
At least one adult (parent or guardian) with all children living at the same address under the age
of 18, or under the age of 22 if still in college (proof of enrollment will be required).
Senior (Sr)
Single
Family
.
.
.
.
Council Agenda - 9/27/99
sc.
Consideration to approve the Business Subsidv Aereement between the EDA and
Aroplax Corporation for GMEF Loan No. 016. (O.K.)
A. Reference and Back!2:round:
The City Council is asked to consider approval of the Business Subsidy Agreement
between the EDA and Aroplax Corporation for GMEF Loan No. 016. As you recall to
meet the new requirements of Minnesota Statutes 1161.993 through I 16J.994, the local
elected governing body must approve the subsidy agreement of an HRA, EDA, or other
governmental unit.
On September 13, the City Council ratified the action of the EDA stating GMEF Loan
No. 016 was not in violation of the EDA-GMEF Business Subsidy Criteria. The subsidy
agreement for approval outlines wage and job goals, remedies, reporting requirements by
the recipient and the grantor, and other criteria as defined by the new statute. The
agreement was prepared by EDA Attorney Dan Greensweig, Kennedy & Graven, along
with the other loan closing documents. Since the amount of the subsidy did not exceed
$100,000, the EDA was not required to hold a public hearing.
A copy of the agreement or excerpts from the agreement are attached. This is a
housekeeping item for the consent agenda unless Council has questions.
B. Alternative Action:
I. A motion to approve the Business Subsidy Agreement between the EDA and
Aroplax Corporation for GMEF Loan No. 016.
2. A motion to deny approval of the Business Subsidy Agreement between the EDA
and Aroplax Corporation for GMEF Loan No. 016.
3. A motion to table any action.
C. Recommendation.
Recommendation is Alternative No. I.
D. SupDortin!2: Data:
Copy or excerpt of Business Subsidy Agreement.
I
.
.
.
LOAN AGREEMENT
",f~):",.
THIS AGREEMENT is made this _ day of , 1999 by Aroplax Corporation, a
Minnesota corporation (the "Borrower") and the Monticello Economic Development Authority, a
public body corporate and politic under the laws of Minnesota (the "Lender").
RECITALS
A. Borrower desires to acquire certain property in the City of Monticello (the "City")
legally described on the Exhibit A attached hereto (the "Property") for the purpose of expanding its
existing business and increasing the number of jobs available within the City.
B. In consideration for the loan contemplated by this Agreement, Borrower has
executed and delivered a Mortgage (the "Mortgage") to Lender in substantially the form of Exhibit
B attached to this Agreement.
C. Lender agrees to loan to Borrower the maximum amount of $100,000 in order to
pay a portion of the purchase price of the Property and thereby enable Borrower to expand its
business in a manner that will lead to the greatest creation of jobs within the City.
ACCORDINGLY, to induce Lender to make the Loan to Borrower, and for good and
valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties
hereto agree as follows:
1. The Loan Amount. Subject to and upon the terms and conditions of this
Agreement, Lender agrees to loan to Borrower the sum of One Hundred Thousand and noll GOths
Dollars ($100,000), or so much thereof as is disbursed to Borrower in accordance with this
Agreement (the "Loan"). The Loan shall be evidenced by a promissory note ("Note") payable by
Borrower to Lender and substantially in the form of Exhibit C attached to this Agreement, which
shall be dated as of the date of this Agreement. Proceeds of the Loan shall be disbursed in
accordance with Section 3 hereof.
2. Repavment of Loan. The Loan shall be repaid with interest as follows:
(a) Interest at the rate of six and one-quarter percent (6.25%) per annum shall
accrue from the Loan Closing Date (as hereinafter defined) until the Loan is repaid in full.
(b) Payments of principal and interest shall commence on the flfst day of the
first month immediately following the Loan Closing Date, and continue on the frrst day of
each and every month thereafter until paid in full. Such payments shall fully amortize the
principal and interest over twenty (20) years; provided, however, the entire remaining
unpaid balance of principal and interest shall be due and payable in full on the flfSt day of
the sixtieth (60th) month following the Loan Closing Date.
D1O-169185
MN325-7
5C
.
.
.
3.
Disbursement of Loan Proceeds.
(a) The Loan proceeds shall be paid to Borrower on
(the "Loan Closing Date").
, 1999
(b) The following events shall be conditions precedent to the payment of the
Loan proceeds to Borrower on the Loan Closing Date:
(i) Borrower having executed and delivered to Lender no later than
three days prior to the Loan Closing Date, without expense to Lender, executed
copies of this Agreement, the Note, and the Mortgage;
(ii) Borrower having provided evidence satisfactory to Lender that
Borrower has established a separate accounting system for the exclusive purpose of
recording the receipt and expenditure of the Loan proceeds;
(iii) Borrower having provided evidence satisfactory to Lender of
commitment and approval of a loan from Stearns Bank N.A. to Borrower for the
purpose of purchasing the Property (the "Bank Loan") and of a loan from the Small
Business Administration to Borrower for the purpose of purchasing the Property
(the "SBA Loan") and together such loans sufficient in amount to do so (the "Bank
Loan");
(iv) Borrower having paid to Lender $200 in loan origination fees;
(v) Borrower having paid all attorney fees, costs, and expenses incurred
by Lender in connection with this Agreement, the Note, and the Mortgage; and
(vi) Execution and delivery to Lender by Jerald J. Schoen, Mary E.
Schoen, and Schoen Properties Umited Partnership of a Guaranty Agreement
substantially in the form shown at Exhibit D to this Agreement.
4. Reoresentations and Warranties. Borrower represents and warrants to Lender that:
(a) Borrower is a corporation duly organized and existing in good standing
under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
(b) Borrower is duly authorized and empowered to execute, deliver, and
perform this Agreement and to borrow money from Lender.
(c) The execution and delivery of this Agreement, and the performance by
Borrower of its obligations hereunder, do not and will not violate or conflict with any
provision of law or the articles or bylaws of Borrower and do not and will not violate or
conflict with, or cause any default or event of default to occur under, any agreement binding
upon Borrower.
D1O-169185
MN325-7
2
.
(d) The execution and delivery of this Agreement have been duly approved by
all necessary action of Borrower, and this Agreement has in fact been duly executed and
delivered by Borrower and constitutes its lawful and binding obligation, legally enforceable
against it
(e) Borrower warrants that it shall keep and maintain books, records, and other
documents relating directly to the receipt and disbursements of Loan proceeds and that any
duly authorized representative of Lender shall, at all reasonable times, have access to and
the right to inspect, copy, audit, and examine all such books, records, and other documents
of Borrower respecting the Loan until the completion of all closeout procedures and the
final settlement and conclusion of all issues arising out of this Loan.
(1) Borrower warrants that it has fully complied with all applicable state and
federal laws pertaining to its business and will continue said compliance throughout the
terms of this Agreement If at any time Borrower receives notice of noncompliance from
any governmental entity, Borrower agrees to take any necessary action to comply with the
State or Federal law in question.
(g) Borrower warrants that it will use the proceeds of the Loan made by Lender
solely for the purchase of the Property.
.
(h) Borrower warrants that it will not create, permit to be created, or allow to
exist any liens, charges, or encumbrances prior to the lien of the Mortgage, except as
expressly permitted by the Mortgage.
(i) Borrower shall create within two years of the date of this Agreement (such
date two years hence is referred to herein as the "Compliance Date"), at least ten (10) new
full-time equivalent jobs (37.5 hours per week per job) on the Property over and above any
jobs f1lled by Borrower in the State of Minnesota prior to the date of this Agreement. At
least nine (9) of the jobs required by this paragraph 4(i) shall be at minimum hourly wages
of at least the lesser of: (i) $8.24; or (ii) 160% of the federal minimum wage, in either case
exclusive of benefits. Borrower shall satisfy this requirement by submitting to Lender on or
before the Compliance Date a written report in a form reasonably satisfactory to Lender
showing that, at any time before the Compliance Date, Borrower has caused creation of the
jObs and attainment of the wage levels specified in this Section, and that such jObs and wage
levels have been maintained for at least 30 days.
(j) Borrower shall continue its operations on the Property for at least five (5)
years following the date of this Agreement
5. Event of Default bv Borrower. The following shall be Events of Default under this
Agreement:
.
(a)
failure to pay when due any principal or interest on the Loan;
(b) any breach or failure of Borrower to perform any other term or condition of
this Agreement (other than a default specified in Paragraph 5(a)) and such failure shall
D10-169185
MN325.7
3
.
continue for thirty days after Lender has given written notice to Borrower specifying such
default or breach unless Lender shall agree in writing to an extension of such time prior to
its expiration; provided, however, that if the failure stated in the notice cannot be corrected
within the applicable period, Lender will not unreasonably withhold its consent to an
extension of such time if corrective action is instituted by Borrower within the applicable
period and is being diligently pursued until the default is corrected, but no such extension
shall be given for a default that can be cured by the payment of money (i.e., payment of
taxes, insurance premiums, or other amounts required to be paid hereunder);
(c) any representation or warranty made by Borrower herein or in any
document, instrument, or certificate given in connection with this Agreement, the Note, or
the Mortgage shall be false when made;
.
(d) Borrower shall fail to pay its debts as they become due, shall make an
assignment for the benefit of its creditors, shall admit in writing its inability to pay its debts
as they become due, shall file a petition under any chapter of the Federal Bankruptcy Code
or any similar law, state or federal. now or hereafter existing, shall become "insolvent" as
that term is generally defined under the Federal Bankruptcy Code, shall in any involuntary
bankruptcy case commenced against it file an answer admitting insolvency or inability to
pay its debts as they become due, or shall fail to obtain a dismissal of such case within thirty
(30) days after its commencement or convert the case from one chapter of the Federal
Bankruptcy Code to another chapter, or be the subject of an order for relief in such
bankruptcy case, or be adjudged a bankrupt or insolvent, or shall have a custodian, trustee or
receiver appointed for, or have any court take jurisdiction of its property, or any part thereof,
in any proceeding for the purpose of reorganization, arrangement, dissolution or liquidation,
and such custodian, trustee or receiver shall not be discharged, or such jurisdiction shall not
be relinquished, vacated or stayed within thirty (30) days of the appointment;
(e) Borrower shall be dissolved, liquidated, or wound up, or shall fail to
maintain its existence as a going concern in good standing (excepting reorganizations,
consolidations and/or mergers into or with affiliates owned by, owning or under common
'control of or with such entity or into the parent of such entity, provided the succeeding
organization assumes and accepts such entity's obligations hereunder); or
(t) a garnishment summons or writ of attachment is issued against or served
upon Lender for the attachment of any property of Borrower in Lender's possession or any
indebtedness owing to Borrower, unless appropriate papers are filed by Borrower contesting
the same within 30 days after the date of such service or such shorter period of time as may
be reasonable in the circumstances.
6. Lender's Remedies upon Borrower's Default. Upon an Event of Default by
Borrower and after receipt of written notice from Lender, Lender shall have the right to exercise any
or all of the following remedies (and any other rights and remedies available to it):
.
(a) declare the principal amount of the Loan and any accrued interest thereon to
be immediately due and payable upon providing written notice to Borrower; provided,
however, that if the implicit price deflator as defmed in Minnesota Schedules, Section
010-169185
MN32S-7
4
.
.
.
275.50, Subdivision 2 exceeds six and one-quarter percent (6.25%) on the date of the
earliest Event of Default, Borrower shall additionally pay to Lender the difference between
the present value of the interest actually accrued on the Loan as of the date of such payment
and the amount of interest that would have accrued on the Loan if the interest rate on the
Loan at all times had been equal to the implicit price deflator on the date of the earliest
Event of Default;
(b) suspend its performance under this Loan Agreement; and
(c) take any action provided for at law to enforce compliance by Borrower with
the terms of this Loan Agreement, the Note, and the Mortgage.
7. Lender's Costs of Enforcement of Allreement. If an Event of Default has occurred
as provided herein, then upon demand by Lender, Borrower will payor reimburse Lender for all
expenses, including all fees and disbursements of legal counsel, incurred by Lender in connection
with the enforcement of this Agreement, or in connection with the protection or enforcement of the
interests and collateral security of Lender in any litigation or bankruptcy or insolvency proceeding
or in any action or proceeding relating in any way to the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement.
8. Subordination. Notwithstanding the provisions of this Agreement, any and all
rights, title and interest Lender may acquire by operation of this Agreement are subordinate to the
Bank Loan and the SBA Loan.
9. Miscellaneous.
(a) Waiver. The performance or observance of any promise or condition set
forth in this Agreement may be waived only in writing. No delay in the exercise of any
power, right or remedy operates as a waiver thereof, nor shall any single or partial exercise
of any other power, right or remedy.
(b) Assienment. This Agreement shall be binding upon Borrower and its
successors and assigns and shall inure to the benefit of Lender and its successors and
assigns. All rights and powers specifically conferred upon Lender may be transferred or
delegated by Lender to any of its successors and assigns. Borrower's rights and obligations
under this Agreement may be assigned only when such assignment is approved in writing
by Lender.
(c) Law Governine: Other Maners. This Agreement shall be governed by the .
substantive laws of the State of Minnesota. Any disputes, controversies, or claims arising
out of this Agreement shall be heard in the state or federal courts of Minnesota., and all
parties to this Agreement waive any objection to the jurisdiction of these courts, whether
based on convenience or. otherwise. If any provision or application of this Agreement is
held unlawful or unenforceable in any respect, such illegality or unenforceability shall not
affect other provisions or applications which can be given effect, and this Agreement shall
be construed as if the unlawful or unenforceable provision or application had never been
contained herein or prescribed hereby. All representations and warranties contained in this
DJG-169185
MN325- 7
5
.
Agreement or in any other agreement between Borrower and Lender shall survive the
execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement and the creation and payment of any
indebtedness to Lender. Borrower waives notice of the acceptance of this Agreement by
Lender. This Agreement, the Note, the Mortgage, and any other document of Borrower
respecting the Loan may only be amended or modified by a writing signed by Borrower and
Lender.
(d) Definition of Tenns. The terms capitalized herein have the same meaning as
provided in the Development Agreement unless otherwise defmed herein.
(e) Notice. All notices required hereunder shall be given by depositing in the
U.S. mail, postage prepaid, certified mail, return receipt requested, to the following
addresses (or such other addresses as either party may notify the other):
To Lender:
Monticello Economic Development Authority
P.O. Box 1147
250 East Broadway
Monticello, Minnesota 55362
Attn: Executive Director
To Borrower:
Aroplax Corporation
200 Chelsea Road
Monticello, Minnesota 55362
.
(f) Tennination. If the Loan is not disbursed pursuant to this Agreement by
February 29, 2000, this Agreement shall tenninate and neither party shall have any further
obligation to the other, except that if the Loan is not disbursed because Borrower has failed
to use its best efforts to comply with the conditions set forth in Section 3 of this Agreement,
then Borrower shall pay to Lender a $200 loan origination fee and attorney fees, costs, and
expenses incurred by Lender in connection with this Agreement, the Note, and the
Mortgage.
10. Indemnification.
(a) Borrower shall and does hereby agree to indemnify against and to hold
Lender, and its officers, agents, and employees, hannless of and from any and all liability,
loss, or damage which it mayor might incur under or by reason of this Agreement, and of
and from any and all claims and demands whatsoever which may be asserted against Lender
by reason of any alleged obligations or undertakings on its part to perform or discharge any .
of the terms, covenants or agreements contained herein.
.
(b) Should Lender, or its officers, agents, or employees incur any such liability
or be required to defend against any claims or demands pursuant to this Section 10, or
should a judgment be entered against Lender, the amount thereof, including costs, expenses,
and reasonable attorneys' fees, shall bear interest thereon at the rate then in effect on the
Note, shall be secured hereby, shall be added to the Loan, and Borrower shall reimburse
Lender for the same immediately upon demand, and upon the failure of Borrower so to do,
DJG-169185
MN325-7
6
.
.
.
Lender may declare the Loan immediately due and payable.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been duly executed and delivered by the
proper officers thereunto duly authorized on the day and year first written above.
DJG~169185
MN325-7
MONTICELLO ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
By
Its Chair
By
Its Executive Director
AROPLAX CORPORATION
By
Its
By
Its
7
. 7.
.
.
Council Agenda - 09/27/99
Public Hearin~ - Consideration of issuinl! an on-sale liquor license - Monticello Country
Club. (RW)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
With the recent conditional use permit being granted to the Monticello Country Club to allow for
expansion of a new clubhouse to include a restaurant facility, they are now requesting approval for the
future issuance of an on-sale liquor license. City ordinances indicate that the Council will hold a public
hearing prior to the issuance of an on-sale license allowing for the public to comment on the granting of
the license. A hearing notice has been published for this purpose.
In October, 1998, the City Council adopted an ordinance amendment requiring that new on-sale liquor
licenses issued to restaurants need to meet the following minimum standards.
1. A restaurant shall have seating capacity for at least 100 guests in a formal dining
area.
2. The restaurant should have a full service menu prepared on site in a licensed
commercial kitchen.
3. The meals shall be regularly served at tables to general public with the
appropriate wait staff.
In reviewing the plans that have been proposed by the Monticello Country Club for their new banquet
and restaurant facility, the country club would be meeting all of the requirements noted above.
The Monticello Country Club is requesting approval of issuance of a license at this time in order for
their plans to proceed. The actual license would not be issued lmtil the facility has been built and is
ready for occupancy.
B. AL TERNA TIVE ACTIONS:
1. After close of the public hearing, the Council could grant approval for the future
issuance of an on-sale liquor license to the Monticello Country Club.
2. If the investigation or facts presented at a public hearing are determined by the Council
to be sufficient cause to not issue a license, the approval could be denied.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is the recommendation of the City Administrator that the license application be approved contingent
upon proof of proper liability insurance. The new banquet facility and restaurant as proposed meet the
minimum requirements previously established by the Council and I am not aware of any reason why the
license would be denied.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
. License Application
.
.
"
DEC 04 '98 04:30PM CITY OF MONTICELLO
P.3/4
CITY OF MONTICELLO
LICENSE APPLICATION
This application is being submitted for the following Ucense(s):
Set~up license Off-sale, non-intoxicating liquor
Y On-sale, intoxicating liquor _ On~sa1e, wine
On~sa1e, non~intoxicati.ng liquor On~sa1e, wine/3.2 beer
Applicant Name: JIl1/)nf/ee//TJ (}ov~rfr.y C/v~ Phone: tb/d-d)9S""-$/6s3
Applicant Address: rJ on+i <-e/!t, ~1!v~ d~
fl., Box!oS" ;11 IJff-lce 10.;t(1t). 5S ..3~d).
Social Security #:
Date of Birth:
Driver's License #:
Business Name:
/YJ on .I,'~< / If)
/30)( /.t;5/
t:oun./vy (! jtl~
rrl()nl;'c.~J If) I MAl. 5536~
Business Address:
Business Phone: (P/r;}-c)'15.- '-It:, 53
Describe nature of business operation;
If Corporation:
ba~€1 f? Frl'€-_
::r-4cx p()7( €f1..
+::Jd ~jl~~QiJI ,/
#:Zu f1 ~~~~~AJ
k:: t'" I-!-o/ (~ y
Ken &.sI-eA/
.pies ;d€o.rl-
VlCF r.t>st'cI~Hr
I;.ec; .sUr"/!' r
c re:l-a ,. Ii
I
Officers:
Directors:
&nn/e /11~VPr:
,
Do you or does your corporation., partnership, etc., currently hold any license
allowing the sale afwine, intoxicating liquor, non~intoxicating liquor, or set~ups?
)( Yes No
.
If yes: Name of Business: d;tf;c-e>/Io ~f.)"~( flvi
Business Address: AOK ~5" I
I"Y}tJNTICEUO, /Yf1V .ss.3~.;;J.
Business Phone: &/dJ - d9S - o/"~ s: 5
Type of License: 01\- sale. w;,,€.. ,/3..;./ b~'(' Years Held; 30 yeqv<:;
LIQLIC..APP; 10/3/95
I
DEC 04 '98 04:30PM CITY OF MONTICELLO
P.4/4
References:
. N~me
ArirlTej:lS
Phone Number
Credit References Gist at least one bank you do business with):
N::mu'!
F/f'sl- NU+i/;!ti I &J1k
i~~e;~!{ SI
/l /C~ ~ ;NJI/~ 5;5.51;2
, Phone .~umber
fo/~ -OJ S-~9D
Amount of investment, excluding land: -4 '-!O(J; tJOO +
(only applicants for on-sale, intonca.ting liquOI." must provide this information)
Have you ever been convicted of a felony or of violating the National Prohibition Act
or any state law or ordinance relating to manufacture Or transportation of
intoxicating liquors? N CJ
r declare that the above information is true and CO.L~l::l, to the:est ~fmy k:nowle~e.
. !-d(P-1c; CJ0~ f? ~ t?~
Date of Application Applicant Signature ?W ~i, (}. (l.
.*******************.........******************......****..*****.....**+*~
(For City Use Only)
Surety Bond
Liquor Liability
Insurance Certificate
Application Fee License Fee
Sheriff, Wright County Mayor
Date City Administrator
. D~
LIQLICAPP: 1013195,
I
.
.
.
Council Agenda - 9/27/99
8.
Public Dearine - Consideration to adopt a resolution authorizine application to the
Minnesota Department of Trade and Economic Development (DTED) for funding
an economic development proiect. (O.K.)
A. Reference and Background:
PUBLIC HEARING
The Mayor should open the public hearing for comments or questions.. The public
hearing notice appeared in the Monticello Times, September 16 and 23, 1999, for
compliance of Minnesota Statutes.
As you are aware, Twin City Die Castings Company has selected the City of Monticello
for its proposed expansion project. The six-acre site is located along Chelsea Road to the
south and immediately west of the new high school entrance road. Phase I consists of
approximately 36,000 sq ft with an occupancy date of June 2000. Phase II consists of
16,000 sq ft with an occupancy date of June 2002 and a total employment of89.
Knowing the company expansion plans met the criteria of the city and the state funding
programs, Koropchak contacted the DTED representative as to the State's interest to
participate in this expansion project. With the State's immediate interest in the proposed
project and as a part of the recruitment process, Lenny Kirscht, Park National Bank, was
called aboard to package the Minnesota Investment Fund (MIF) Application. The
estimated 7.9 million dollar project has two separate funding uses and sources statement.
The real estate costs estimated at 2.4 million dollars and the machinery/equipment costs
estimated at 5.5 million dollars. The Monticello facility will establish a magnesium casting
division for the company requiring a large investment in die casting machines and CNC
machinery. The funding sources proposed for the machinery/equipment are Industrial
Revenue Bonds, Minnesota Investment Fund, Monticello GMEF, and equity.
After hearing comments and questions from the public, the Mayor should close the public
hearing.
RESOLUTION FOR ADOPTION
The resolution for adoption states that the City of Monticello has the legal authority to
apply for financial assistance, will enter into certain agreements and comply with all
applicable laws, and authorizes application to the Department of Trade and Economic
Development for the Twin City Die Castings Company project.
.
Council Agenda - 9/27/99
The City of Monticello will apply for a grant in the amount of $500,000. Upon receiving
the grant, the City will loan the $500,000 to Twin City Die Castings Company at terms
negotiated between the city and company. Lenny Kirscht and Mark Ruff, Ehlers &
Associates, report terms of a 3% fixed interest rate over 10 years are typical for this type
of program. However, the Small Cities Economic Development Grants of a few years
ago to Aroplax and Standard Iron were at 6%. Again, the $500,000 is part of the
machinery/equipment funding. The State is proposing the MIF dollars be from the State's
federal dollars which means the City of Monticello retains the full $500,000 principal plus
interest for the purpose of providing future loans to assist expanding businesses. In other
words, the principal and interest payback payments will go into the GMEF.
The purpose of the Minnesota Investment Fund Program is to create new and retain the
highest quality jobs possible on a state wide basis with a focus on industrial,
manufacturing, and technology related industries; to increase the local and state tax base
and improve the economic vitality for all Minnesota citizens. Eligible projects include
loans for land, building, equipment and training. Funds may also be used for infrastructure
improvements necessary to support businesses located or intending to locate in Minnesota.
Ineligible projects include working capital, retail business, and industrial park
development.
.
Mr. Lenny Kirscht will be present at the Council meeting to review the application process
and legal obligations of the City. It is anticipated the completed application will be
submitted to the State on September 30, 1999. The HRA/EDA Attorney will prepare the
State's loan closing documents as well as the GMEF and TIF documents. The City's
Economic Development Director administers the awarded State funds and programs. At
a later date, the Council will hold a public hearing relative to the $500,000 loan and
approve a business subsidy agreement relative to the $500,000 loan and the estimated
$40,000 TIF Local Contribution.
B. Alternative Action:
1. A motion to approve the Local Government Resolution, Economic Development
Program, authorizing application to the Minnesota Department of Trade and
Economic Development for the Twin City Die Castings Company.
2. A motion to deny approval of the Local Government Resolution, Economic
Development Program, authorizing application to the Minnesota Department of
Trade and Economic Development for the Twin City Die Castings Company.
3. A motion to table any action.
.
2
.
Council Agenda - 9/27/99
The City of Monticello will apply for a grant in the amount of $500,000. Upon receiving
the grant, the City will loan the $500,000 to Twin City Die Castings Company at terms
negotiated between the city and company. Lenny Kirscht and Mark Ruff, Ehlers &
Associates, report terms of a 3% fixed interest rate over 10 years are typical for this type
of program. However, the Small Cities Economic Development Grants of a few years
ago to Aroplax and Standard Iron were at 6%. Again, the $500,000 is part of the
machinery/equipment funding. The State is proposing the MIF dollars be from the State's
federal dollars which means the City of Monticello retains the full $500,000 principal plus
interest for the purpose of providing future loans to assist expanding businesses. In other
words, the principal and interest payback payments will go into the GMEF.
The purpose ofthe Minnesota Investment Fund Program is to create new and retain the
highest quality jobs possible on a state wide basis with a focus on industrial,
manufacturing, and technology related industries; to increase the local and state tax base
and improve the economic vitality for all Minnesota citizens. Eligible projects include
loans for land, building, equipment and training. Funds may also be used for infrastructure
improvements necessary to support businesses located or intending to locate in Minnesota.
Ineligible projects include working capital, retail business, and industrial park
development.
.
Mr. Lenny Kirscht will be present at the Council meeting to review the application process
and legal obligations of the City. It is anticipated the completed application will be
submitted to the State on September 30, 1999. The HRAlEDA Attorney will prepare the
State's loan closing documents as well as the GMEF and TlF documents. The City's
Economic Development Director administers the awarded State funds and programs. At
a later date, the Council will hold a public hearing relative to the $500,000 loan and
approve a business subsidy agreement relative to the $500,000 loan and the estimated
$40,000 TIF Local Contribution.
B. Alternative Action:
1. A motion to approve the Local Government Resolution, Economic Development
Program, authorizing application to the Minnesota Department of Trade and
Economic Development for the Twin City Die Castings Company.
2. A motion to deny approval of the Local Government Resolution, Economic
Development Program, authorizing application to the Minnesota Department of
Trade and Economic Development for the Twin City Die Castings Company.
3. A motion to table any action.
.
2
.
Council Agenda - 9/27/99
c.
Recommendation:
The City Administrator and Economic Development Director recommend alternative
action no. 1 and recommend the terms of the loan be negotiated at a 3% or 4% fixed rate
over 10 years for the Minnesota Investment Fund. The GMEF loan will follow its
guidelines. Ifthe State contributes to the TIF district project, the City can be reimbursed
for the local contribution by tax increment though a certain formula.
D. Supporting Data:
Resolution for adoption, public hearing notice, estimated uses and sources statement, and
job and wage-level goals.
.
.
3
.
.
.
RESOLUTION NO. 99
LOCAL GOVERNMENT RESOLUTION
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
BE IT RESOL VED, that the City of Monticello act as the legal sponsor for project(s) contained
in the Business and Community Development Application to be submitted on September 30,
1999 and that thc Mayor of the City of Monticello and the City Administrator are hereby
authorized to apply to the Department of Trade and Economic Dcvelopment for funding of this
projcct on behalf of the City of Monticello.
BE IT .FURTHER RESOL VED, that the City of Monticello has the legal authority to apply for
financial assistance and the institutional, managerial, and financial capability to ensure adequate
construction, operation, maintenance and replacement of the proposed project for its design life.
BE IT FURTHER RESOL VED, that the City of Monticello has not incurred any costs and has
not entered into any written agreements to purchase property.
BE IT FURTHER RESOL VED, that the City of Monticello has not violated any Federal, State,
or local laws pertaining to fraud, bribery, kickbacks, collusion, conflict of interest or other
unlawful or corrupt practice.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that upon approval of its application by the state, the City of
Monticello may enter into an agreement with the State of Minnesota for the above referenced
project(s), and that the City of Monticello certifies that it will comply with all applicable laws
and regulations as stated in all contract agreements and described on the Compliance
Certification of the Business and Community Development Application.
AS APPLICABLE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City of Monticello has obtained
credit reports and credit information {[om Twin City Die Castings Company and Doug and Steve
Harmon. Upon review by the City of Monticello and the City Attorney no adverse findings or
concerns regarding, but not limited to, tax'liens,judgments, court actions, and filings with state,
federal and other regulatory agencies were identified. Failure to disclose any such adverse
information could result in revocation or other legal action,
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Mayor of the City of Monticello and the
City Administrator, or their successors in office, are hereby authorized to execute such
agreements, and amendments thereto, as are necessary to implement the project(s) on behalf of
the applicant.
Adopted by the Monticello City Council on the 27th day of September 1999,
ATTEST:
Roger Belsaas, Mayor
Rick Wolfsteller, City Administrator
~
.
.
.
I CERTIFY THAT, the above resolution was adopted by the City Council on Septelllber 27,
1999.
SIGNED:
WITNESSED:
Mayor
Date
City Administrator
Date
.
lpportunities
ursday, Sept. 16. 1999
-
.~~~
=~ Manager
d and motivated con~
nage and to meet and
:r department in the
responsible. for the
i administration of client
liS and department ini~
ndents achieve busi~
or certified educational
p/supervisory experi
e experience, familiar
ra
environment and expe
nmunications a must
ness and to become a
1 addition to competitive
,:fit package. Qualified
e and salary require~
Incorporated
Services
;36
~5 365
Area Public
Notices
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
CITY OF MONTICELLO
COUNTY OF WRIGHT
STATE OF MINNESOTA
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City of Monticello will hold a public hearing on
Monday, Sept. 27, 1999 at approximately 7:00 p.m., at the Monticello City Hall, 250 E.
Broadway, Monticello, MN 55362, to consider making an application for funding from the
State of Minnesota under the Small Cities Economic Development Program for an eco-
nomic development project. The program and its requirements wnl be explained.
Comments and questions will be welcome. Under consideration will be a proposal to
assist Twin City Die Castings Company with its proposed expansion project.
. The State's program is designed to provide assistance to private businesses in get-
ting started or in expanding, while benefitting low and moderate-income persons. For
information, call Ollie Koropchak, Economic Development Director at (612) 295.2711.
- Rick WOlfsteller, City Administrator
(Sept. 16 and 23, 1999)
:r
. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS
Notice is hereby given that public hearings will be held by the City of Monticello
Planning Commission on September 27,1999,5:30 p.m.. in the MonticellO City Hall to
consider the the following matter:
PUBLIC HEARING: Consideration of a conditional use permit allowing a commercial
planned unit development and conditional use permit allowing outside sales.
Location; 1201 Highway 25 S., Monticello, MN
Applicant Automaxx Car Stores
Written and oral testimony will be accepted on above subjects, and all persons desir-
ing to be heard on referenced subjects will be heard at this meeting.
Note: Decisions of the Planning Commission will be subject to the approval or denial of
the City Council and will be heard on Monday, September 27,1999, at 7 p.m., at the
. Monticello City Hall.
- Fred Patch, Zoning Administrator
(Sept. 16, 23, 1999)
NOTICE OF SALE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that default has occurred in the conditions of the follow-
ing described lease for stor<:ge of personal property;
DATE OF LEASE: January 30,1998
LESSOR; AMAX Storage Facilitators
LESSEE: Hub Vamer
AMOUNT DUE AND CLAIMED TO BE DUE AS OF DATE OF NOTICE: $451.00
PROPERTY HELD; Miscellaneous Property .
PURSUANT to the power of sale contained in said lease, the above described prop-
erty will be sold by auction as follows;' .
DATE AND TIME OF SALE: October 1..1999 at 4:00 p.m.
PLACE OF SALE:AMAX Storage Facilitators
36 Dundas Road .
Monticello, MN 55362
DATED: September 10. 1999, AMAX Storage Faciliiators
Stephen R. Conroy
Attomey for Lessor
. 261 E. Broadway
P.O. Box 999
Monticello, MN 55362
(Sept. 16. 23. 1999)
NOTlCE OF SALE
NOTICE .IS HEREBY GIVEN. that default t'las occurred.in the conditions of the follow- -
NOT
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that dete_
.. ing described lease for storage of person"
DATE OF LEASE: April 1, 1999
LESSOR: AMAX Storage Facilitators
LESSEE: Mike Eisele
AMOUNT DUE AND CLAIMED TO 8f
PROPERTY HELD: Miscellaneous Pr
PURSUANT to the power of sale cont
erty will be sold by auction as follows:
DATE AND TIME OF SALE: October
PLACE OF SALE:AMAX Storage Fac
36 Dundas Road
Monticello, MN 553f
DATED: September 10,1999, AM AX
Stephen R. Conroy
Attomey for Lessor
261 E. Broadway
P.O. Bqx 999
Monticello, MN 55362
(Sept. 16, 23, 1999)
NOT
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that deb
ing described lease for storage of person2
DATE OF LEASE: April 10, 1999
LESSOR:-AMAX Storage Facilitators
LESSEE: Robert Ranthum
AMOUNT DUE AND CLAIMED TO 6;'
PROPERTY HELD: Miscellaneous Pre
PURSUANT to the power of sale cont;
erty will be sold by auction as follows:
DATE AND TIME OF SALE: October
PLACE OF SALE:AMAX Storage Fac
. 36 Dundas Road
Monticello, MN 55310
DATED: September 10,1999, AMAX
Stephen R. Conroy
Attomey for Lessor
261 E. Broadway
P.O. Box 999
Monticello, MN 55362
(Sept. 16, 23, 1999)
'6
BRIDGE PA
LIFT STATION. SANITARY
CITY PRt
FOR THE C:
WRIGHT C(
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN th8
Monticello at the office of the City Aa
the City Hall and will be publicly open.
tatives of the City of Monticello. Said ~
rials for the construction, complete in-r
- 1 LS Duplex Submersible Lift
1 ,100 LF 10" PVC C900 Sanitary ,
670 LF 12wPVC, 15" PVC, and 1_
The bids must be submitted on the
Contract Documents, Plans, and Spe
Inc., 350 Westwood Lake Office, 844
which are on file with the City Adminis:
of the Consulting Engineers or at the (
Copies of Proposal Forms and Plar
mitting a bid may be obtained from the
350 Westwood Lake Office, 8441 Wa
deposit of Thirty-Five Dollars ($35.00)
No bids will be considered unless
Monticello and accompanied by a cas:
bond made payable to the City of Mon
be forfeited as liquidated damages in t.
fail to enter promptly Into a written cor
. . N~. bJ~s T,ay ~~ wit~?!~~~ !?~ ~p_e
SEP-21-1999 10:51
PARK NATIONAL BANK
e
TWIN CITY DIE CASTING
EQUIPMENT FINANCING
USES OF FUNDS
Buhl.r
Fumac..
Trims
Comprossors
Automobile
CNC Maohinery
Soft COltIlCQl1tinien~>,
TOTAL
SOURCES OF FtJNDS
e
$~~I ot MN' :Bond :p~o~
MN InvI.tmeut Pund
MOI'A~ic.llo EAtftpri.. Fund
iQ\lity Capital
TOTAL
COLLATERAL COVERAGE
Estimated FF&E (Full Val\lc)
Less: Bond Procoeds
Total ExceslI Collateral '
L TV for Bond Program
s
$
ESTIMATED DEBT SERVICE
State Of MN Bond Program
:MN Investment Fund '(~ ~./o
Monticello Enterprise Fund yOlo " "'ls' 0...-
Equity Capital
t3L ~"
6125912764 P.03/04
2,872,000.00
1_0561000,00
352.000.00
58,000.00
34.000.00
920,000.00
250,000.00
5,542,000.00
.. ~ - .~
4,550,000.00
$00,000.00
100.000.00
~92!..OOQ.QQ.
5,542,000.00
S,S42.000.00
4.550,000.00
992,000.00
82%
S2,24S.00
4.828.00
1,460.00
el
TOTAL
ANNUAL
58,533.00
702,396.00
't
SEP-21-1999 10:51
PARK NATIONAL BANK
6125912764 P.04/04
.
.
. ,
I
"{
TOTF=lL F'.04
e
e
el
SEP-21-1999 10:51
PARK NATIONAL BANK
TWIN CITY DIE CASTING
REAL ESTATE PROJECT
USES OF FUNDS
LAND ACQ'01SttION.. cS ar::tol @ S35,OOO/aor.
,BtJlt.t>ING CONSntlC'I'toN'
CONtXNOBNCY" SOFT COSTS
~' ~ . .
TOTAL
SOlJ'RCJ:S OF li'UNnS
BANK.. TCM + 2.75%.20 YEARS, 1ST REM
SBA 504 LOAN. 8.5%, 20 YRS. 2ND REM
BQUITY CAPITAUT AX INC, FINANCING ·
-'Ii""
TO"!""",
COLLATERAL COVERAGE
Facility Value (est. value)
Leal: 1.t Morta.,e
'rotal Sxcesl Collateral
L TV for Bank
$
$
ESTIMATED DEBT SERVICE
BANK. TeM + 2,75%. 20 YEARS, 1ST:REM
SBA 504 LOAN. 8.5%. 20 YRS, 2ND REM
TOTAL
ANNuAL
6125912764 P.02/04
210,000.00
2.140.000.00
35,000.00
~...
2,385,000.00
-
1.135.000.00
1,000,000,00
2$0,000,00
..
=,~85,OQO.C~
2,385.000.00
1,13S,OOO.OO
- -
1.2'0,000.00
48%
10,030.00
8,680.00
18,710.00
%24,520.00
1>
,ll! r-:',II....r::,'r'
, , ../
, "
-~
ji
~ ~
,.. -
~ \1J
.v
-j:-;
\j 0
~
~ = z
.- 0 0
'1 == l-
E (- ~ ~
_ _ z
o ~ <(
" LL. G)._ ::=
nI ee a:
'Wi C'O c.. W
C z..... a..
mC'O -
en:i:'
OJ c:;:
.mi 1
~ .~ C'O
i 5
CD CD
E III
:r:r ~
.a m
.c
o
..,
-I
J
w
-
-
c:::
Q)
l::
C'CI
E
Q)
c..
-
5i
e
t
~
-
~
~
8
c,~
~'!
~t-
G:I ~
::a_ ~..r.1
I:;~
~.a ~
c
Q)
CD
... ~
CD
llii 5
::10 .c
cu
i gJ
VI ;
j ~ - -... ........ ~
c!
CD
U ~
i~ ~
III 1Il
..5
I~ B r--.
~ -
I~ ; 1
~01 fA>
'.,5 8,
. ~
1iI~ t/I
UJ >-
_l! ">- S
~j
,I;;
.€I t
~C .!.
Ql q ~ lJl ~-" ~ <:) '.n ~ ~ ~ ~ \t'
;; C)
~~ ~ ~ C"1. 1.11
. tD ~
~~ \I) ~ .....s IJ) ~ ~ ~ ';t- T'
~c!
~ (./1 j'"
!€ Ie C ~ (l Cl 0 rf') \n 1~
<;::) .~ ~ og ~ ~ .1.t1 ,... uoo
Q:i .n ..
~ . ('() ~
-!'al ~ ~ ~ lV1 C"j -: ~ ~o
:::J 0 -...... - - - -
~l ....... s
loQ
~'. :2.
I::: ; S
~~ ~
- ~ , \n lG ~ rob
cr~.! ~ - c1 ti -
~ =111.2,
-:! -
~ \.
-..a. 1 \U '-~
<3 ~ ~ i ') ~ l1"""
~ ~ 2i ~ .. ~ ~
w ~
~ ~ .
~ ~ ()L 4- ~ ~ ~ "
z G ~ 1 "4 oJ ~ ~
0 ~ ~ ,~
E \)j cS ~ E ~
~ I_ S a;
~
ZOO 'd
08ZS vv9 IS9:131
snNI1SVJ 310 A1IJ NIM1
90:01 II"Mdl66 ,01- 'd3S
~ 'E&!j
5 j ~ .
1'- ,5 CD ,$I lJl
e :S~Ri
,g 'Oie
~ ~lD!
CD ....=
~~ i~~
~l :i~
ClIo .owZ'-
!!== -o..c::
"'. ~ '" :::J
0;;1 8 =i8
i~ 11~
N! !'1~
~= i...c
:= !I 2:--
ie, ~.5
~selD:g,3
c.~C ~Qj,g
!!5i::l !""
~;gl!~
tf~1!lt
.! '" j ~ ~ 1
!.", CCI)J:9
a'j3 ~~.! ~
p.rZ i 5:1: ~
Ii . ~ 0.....:.:.=
'EZ.,lYEa:loi!:
.9l~{J8~~
r;v - t;;]I j::: ClI
t f ~ :; ,~ c3
~j~~l.~
~Sie"'ij
N!I~~~ii
Sc=tt~g-
all c "1:1 !~
,If,I'g $~:;
~ ClILL ._
af5' i~~
UUf 1f!
llJ >~c
. c; u z,f
. i iil
41'3 ~~.o
~i ~~i
~~ ~~1J
0._ ClIX
,u = G)
. I .~~ ~
E ~jSJ
8 l:ll nl
->0 ;!lD.o
"'3 ~Clll
o 8 all
z::. .!..5~
.n J!l iz::.
~ ~;;a
~ 0.8.
t:.
~ ~
~
\5
j
u
:d
-.:;:r
li
CD
j
.!2
c::
o
=
nl
E
.s.
.5
I
.2
=-
5
4l
.Ii:
i~
==~
g J!:'-
=:e~
i ~~
~ ~
'1
.
.
.
City Council Agenda -09/27/99
9.
Consideration of a rea uest for a ConditionallJse Permit within the B-3 Zoning District
to allow Outdoor Sales and Displav of automobiles and a Conditional Use Permit
Planned Unit Development to allow the automobile sales operation to be located on two
separate parcels. Applicant: Automaxx Car Stores. (NAC)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
The agenda information below will be reviewed by the Planning Commission at a special
meeting immediately prior to the City Council Meeting. The Planning Commission
recommendation will therefore be provided as part of the agenda item presentation.
Automaxx Car Stores has applied to develop an automobile sales facility on portions of two
parcels currently owned by Jay Morrell. The properties are at 1205 and 1219 Highway 25
South - the former Royal Tire building and the Glass Hut property. The operation would
utilize the Royal Tire building for its inside activities, including office and some minor
detailing. The lot area of the Royal Tire building would be used for customer parking and
automobile display, together with the northerly portion of the Glass Hut property. The
property line between the two parcels runs just 10 feet south of the Royal Tire building,
resulting in the overlap of uses.
The developer has asked to accommodate customer parking for the Automaxx use by
providing 14 parking spaces on the east and south walls of the building. The Zoning
Ordinance does not specify the required number of spaces for this type of use. Based upon
other available data, it would appear that the fourteen spaces proposed should be adequate,
assuming that no other uses will be made of the building, such as service or parts. A
condition of any PU D approval should be that the facility provide additional parking spaces
in the event that the proposed fourteen spaces do not prove to be enough.
There are a few issues related to the parking spaces, and the proximity of the display area.
A regulation parking space requires 20 feet of depth and at least 22 feet of drive aisle to
accommodate backing and turning space. Because of the siting of the display vehicles, only
three of the nine spaces on the west side of building would have adequate area to pull into
and out of. On the south side of the building, four of the five spaces do not have adequate
backing space. The display area should be rearranged to accommodate these needs. It would
also be beneficial to clearly delineate the difference between customer parking and vehicle
display. Given the layout of the site, it would probably be impractical to require curbed
medians separating the two areas. However, pavement markings would be a positive
addition to avoid parking in the display area or vice-versa. The layout should be revised as
suggested on the attached staff sketch to ensure adequate parking and circulation.
The site plan shows a proposed curb line along the front and north side property lines,
complying with the five foot setback. There are two areas where the curb has been
.
City Council Agenda -09/27/99
discontinued. The first is at the primary site entrance along Sandberg Road. The zoning
ordinance directs a maximum curb cut opening of 24 feet to control traffic flow. The
proposed curb should be revised as shown in the stafT sketch to comply with this standard.
The second area is along Marvin Road, which is currently unimproved. The applicant is
requesting flexibility under the PUD to defer curbing in this area, pending a City decision
on the status of this right~of"way. Both full street construction and vacation have been
discussed, and the City Council is expected to consider this issue in the near future. Given
this potential change, it may be reasonable to defer this improvement until the Marvin Road
status is resolved.
The City has a requirement on commercial sites that one tree per 50 lineal feet of site
perimeter be planted on the property. The pun site contains just over 1 ,250 lineal feet,
resulting in a requirement for 25 trees. The applicant has complied with this requirement on
the proposed site plan.
.
The remaining issue involves improvements to the Glass Hut property. The Glass Hut site
includes an area of existing concrete paving, and a proposed customer parking area along the
Highway 25 frontage. At just 30 feet in width (minus the 5 foot curb setback) the parking
area which is proposed is too narrow to allow for effective parking and circulation. An
accessible parking area for this building should be added to the site plan. Due to the setback
ofthe building, the area along the Highway 25 frontage may provide room for a driveway,
but parking will need to be located elsewhere on the site. Under the PUD, the applicant may
wish to consider a joint parking arrangement, if appropriate. It would appear the Glass Hut
site would be a potential redevelopment site at some time in the future.
Finally, the applicant has indicated an expectation for 96 cars on display. With the pavement
markings suggested above to protect parking and circulation, staff believes that organization
of the display area would not require a maximum number of cars. The primary issue would
be keeping them in the appropriate locations on the site, allowing for tight circulation or
double stacking of vehicles, not normally permitted in standard parking lots.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS
Dccision 1: Conditional Use Permit for Auto Sales/Display
1. Motion to recommend approval of the CUP for Auto Sales/Display, subject to the
conditions in Exhibit Z, based on a finding that the use is appropriate for the zoning
district and the proposed site.
2.
Motion to recommend denial of the CUP, based on a finding that the use cannot be
contained on the existing parcel of record.
.
.
City Council Agenda -09/27/99
3.
Motion to table action on the CUP, subject to additional information.
Decision 2: CUP for a Planned Unit Development
1. Motion to recommend approval of the PUD, based on a finding that the shared
display area is a reasonable use of the parcels in this location.
2. Motion to recommend denial of the PUD, based on a finding that there is no showing
that the development will further the City's planning objectives or result in a higher
standard of development.
3. Motion to recommend tabling of the PUD, subject to additional information.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
.
Staff recommends approval of the CUP and pun, only on the conditions listed in Exhibit
Z. If the modifications to the plan are made, the plan will comply with the general intent of
the Conditional Use Provisions ofthe B-3 District. The use ofPUD in this case is somewhat
problematic in that PUD is intended to be applied to projects which offer a higher standard
of development than the basic requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. In this case, the use
ofPUD is primarily a convenience to avoid resubdivision. Nonetheless, it may be that it is
appropriate in this situation since PUD allows the City to flex its standards to allow
reasonable use of the property, pending a future redevelopment of the area. Growth in the
Monticello area, along with the reconstruction of Highway 25, may result in an future
economic incentive to replace the existing buildings with higher quality commercial
structures.
D. SUPPORTING DATA
Exhibit A - Site Location
Exhibit B - Site Plan
Exhibit C - Staff Sketch
Exhibit Z - Conditions of Approval
.
I.
I 1 ,. HICH",;.. 'f
I J ·
--- ,
i - , -...... ·
~ -,
i
i I
r
f
:; , (/) ; ':t
J . . w .. ... - ", . t'" '- .. . ~ ~ f. 11II I III III ... .-;:
. "~ ~
.; . =i t
oS ~T-E' -l r
Lol..Ait1of'.r >- t--
I r-- ,
Z;i
i '
,
f
,
f
THOMAS PA K
o
::D
<
,."
._"._"~It-.~
CHELSEA
cr
-
("J
is !
DUNDAS ~ ROAD
~
g
i
, .
_.......III.-..~...................III~"414.........I.I..iIt..1
. , .
I
.
II ~ ~ _ J
. . ....
_ : EXHIBIT A · SITE L~Cf
f'}tlLLBE~~ q A : ~
\
\
\
\
\ 'J:l
I 3'
,
; \
! ,
,
\
1
1
\~
,?Q
\<
\'Z
,
1
.\
.1
,
\
,
. \
\
\
\
\~
\ '=I
\
,
\
,
,
.\
\
,
\ "
,
,
\
.
.
. ,
.
/
I
I'
I
I
,
\
&,lJtj, liS SfM(CD
(\ ~.
\, ....
., "-... s4M '""-...
" ~ '-... .. 0~'" "'-....
.. e 34. 68 ,r.-., ''/ ~ -C;"'G" ..
::c , n. 1/1(, " ~
'.
.
\
88. 36
.
i I
,: \
\
\
\
.
i
j , ,
I
,
.
\
\
\
\
\ "
"
(
I '
,
\
BLlIG. AS SrA/tCQ
( ,
\ ~,.
\, ... -..........
. \, ~ ~~'.......
2: ~," ...."':'-"l ' "," 17 .;
:I 1'1.".,., J.II'A At A
"
/(].
\
I
\~
I :;0
\ <
\'%
\
\
.\
\
\
\
,
, ,
\
\
,
\ .
,~
'. >
\ ~
,
,
\
,
,
.\
,
,
\ ,3
,
,
\
\
\
'/
I
I'
I
I
II
/
I
/.
,
'~ I,
B /':
.1 ;
_.~ I,
I
/
/
/
/
/
I '- .qC
/ ,
88. ~XHIBIT. C . .sT~FF SKETCH
I
~~
~
~
Co,
.~
.
.
.
PUD/CUP Conditions of Approval - Automaxx Car Sales
1. Paving and curbing constructed in all areas as delineated on site plan, with the following
alterations:
a. Addition of a conforming 24 foot wide curb cut at Sandberg Road.
b. Addition of conforming parking stalls for the Glass Hut Parcel.
c. Pavement markings which preserve 149' x 20' parking stalls with 24' drive aisles on
the Automaxx parcel.
2. Ability to expand parking area on the Automaxx parcel if the Plmming Commission finds
that additional parking supply is necessary.
3. Paving and curbing along the Marvin Road frontage within twelve months ofa resolution
of the status of Marvin Road by the City Council.
4. Landscaping of the parcel per site plan.
5. Recommendations of other City Staff, induding the City Engineer.
EXHIBIT Z
q
.
Council Agenda - 9/27/99
10.
Consideration of offer to purchase City owned Darcel adiacent to ncwlv created Chelsea
Road East between TH 25/Ccdar Street (R W)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
At our last meeting. the Council reviewed separate proposals from Dan Mielke and Dave Peterson for
the purchase oUhe 12,420 sq. ft. remnant parcel adjacent to Chelsea Road/Cedar Street. The Council
had tabled any action on the proposals to allow time for the staff to address concerns that were noted in
the proposal from Dave Peterson and to allow for any additional proposals to be presented for
consideration.
A third party that had expressed interest in the parcel has not presented an offer, and at this point the
Council has two proposals to consider. Mr. Mielke has indicated that he would like the Council to
consider his original offer of $3.00/sq. ft. for the property, but with the contingency that the City be
responsible for relocating the existing watermain along the north boundary of the parcel. As our
engineer had noted, the estimated cost to relocate the water line could be $18,000 or more, depending
on the amount and location of the line that has to be moved.
.
In reviewing the size of the parcel with Mr. Ron Bray ofWSB, it appears that the City could add an
additional 10 feet of the boulevard along Chelsea Road to the parcel to make the parcel more suitable for
development. This reduction in the boulevard is not anticipated to cause any problems in the future
provided we do not reduce the boulevard size along the western half of the block near TH 25. It is
recommended that the City continue to have a larger right-of-way near TlI 25 in case an additional turn
lane would ever be needed on TH 25. The result is that this additional 10 foot area would increase the
size of the lot to 13,949 sq. ft.. with a building area of 6,314 sq. ft.
The concerns that were addressed by Mr. Peterson in his original tentative offer have been resolved and
Mr. Peterson has submitted a new offer that amounts to $4.25/sq. ft. for the 13,949 sq. ft. totaling
$59,283.25. The offer is not contingent upon the City being involved in the relocation of the watermain
and it indicates that the cost of relocating the watermain would be borne by whichever party initiated the
action. Mr. Peterson indicates they have not intention of relocating the watennain at this time. The
offer was submitted with a $1,000 earnest money check to demonstrate their seriousness of this
purchase.
In conversations with Mr. Mielke he indicated they may be submitting another offer to the City Council
Monday night for consideration. Without knowing what that ofTer may be, the following is a summary
of what the current offers are:
.
1. Mielke Proposal- $3.00/sq. ft. for a total of$4l, 847.00 (Assuming they are willing to
purchase the new lot dimensions of 13,949 sq. ft.) This offer would be subject to the City
expenditure of an estimated $18,000 to relocate the water line resulting in a net revenue to the
City of approximately $23,850.
2. Peterson Proposal- $4.25 sq. ft. for a total 01'$59,283.25. The offer does not require the City
to spend any money to relocate the water line.
Council Agenda - 9/27/99
. As I have noted prcviously, the City has over $4.00/sq. ft. invested in this parcel acquisition. Bascd on
our investment in the propcrty, it appcars that Mr. Peterson's proposal would provide over $35,000 more
in revenue to the City than the original offer from Mr. Mielke.
B. AL TKRNA TIVE ACTIONS:
1. The Council consider agreeing to sell the remnant parcel to Mr. Peterson at $4.25/sq. ft.
Acceptance by the Council of this proposal would allow Mr. Mielkc ten days to match
the offcr as proposed per the right of first refusal agreement.
2. The Council could accept an offer proposed by Mr. Mielke at $3.00/sq. n. with the City
being liable for relocation of the water line estimated at $18,000.
3. The Council could decide not to sell the property at this time.
c. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
.
The offer proposed by Mr. Peterson would allow the City to recover the cost of acquiring this parcel.
Because the proposal docs not have any contingency, there would be less uncertainty over our net sale
proceeds. Because the difference bctween the offers is substantial at $35,000 or more, it is my
recommendation the offer proposed by Mr. Peterson be accepted. While this parcel could ccrtainly be
an attractive addition to the property Mr. Mielke owns, I don't feel that it has been demonstrated that the
Mielke property could not be developed without this remnant parcel. If the adjacent property owner
feels that this parcel is absolutely necessary for any development to occur in the area, the right of first
refusal basically guarantees them the option of matching the highest offer.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
· Sketch plan of revised lot
· Original proposal from Dan Mielke
· Proposal from Dave Peterson
.
\ ",'
T TA\. IV.
I"'", J
J ,it
...-- ~ 0--
SEP-21-1999 16:28
J>.- ~~ S ,';. i..---
~
---
-
----==-
~~.." I
-.--. .-- .- - .-" .-\ ". -, \
or....)' \
\ t" \\
\\ ,\ \
. -..- ~~\.,-,... \ ,)
, ..," -" .\ '
, - -- -,- .-"
'"-- - -
--.. "'-"~ ~'...... \
~'" ~~ .....'" "....!II .'"
\ ~ ~ ,-
._--......-..~-.-... ;~
, ;
,
.....-
, ,I '
o , ," \ /
'\ \....~.
I .~ ,....._ , .;
'. II..... \ ~~;
, "'.'" ,,,- " ,.,"';' "
I ~t... I'_ .11.1~ ,
. ".. -""'". ._..11 .... \
.. \ I
,
.,
,
~.=..~ _ _ -. _u.. _ .A
WSB & ASSOCIATES INC.
6125411700 P.02/02
u
-I-
--j
......
,-
o
o
l\
. D'l \11.1"" ,,~._~;:;
,u"e~~..~~.~~'-' . - 1 ~]!~ ~
____ ... .. A.
. \\' -------.-
..-,_...-.~ - ~
,.,_.... ~ - - r--'~'
\ (':.A-~~ ......._ ....
, ...... I
II ~::.. (j' 1"'.) -,....,..-.
.i:>>l. ..e.. 1l" '~ )
~ ,,' - " I. /'
."~. III (~. J"
\ -1' r '~
~ '\,
\i .\ \'----\
" ,,c:. -.... ..\\-\@\"
..., l \
. ,
\,,--, .-... ...-,\-,-. \
,
'.
..~---"C--
----...
(-'"{
~ I
(
,...--., __. ' \.~""",
iIot_.. _""'"
I':
l, /
I 'H4o...
,
" '
"-
,
(
,.,...,..,,- ...............-----......"'....,.....
" ""
": 19' ( '2'A9=EkSl
' '. )' l_
\ . -, '-, ..-...
,
"
1,1tI'~II.'I~"!~I~iII'_~1In,11fI ..."',....."'...,."'..'.1 "
Cedar Str.et +600
CD NJDS IA" SQ n '110M OIHCINN.
(j) IlT m'Ia rJNlr ....'Ut.s " UTluTIlS Mt. IfIUlCATID.
...
trlf
* WIllwood lAke Otlic:e
"" 1 Wlyzall 801.1loiii111
MilI,.UOh. MN NGO
"a..,4CIO
I"M ",.f1OD
IN'NAlITl""C~. . IiHOIN"'" - Jll.ANNMI
I" lU3.00\...".. ....2.. 2.21.~,..
'UI~OINO AAI4 0' I.~ II. '.31~ la fT CD
TOTAL AfttA ~ 28ft IS · 13.S~9 sa FT
II Trunk lligbway 25
WSI Prqect No. fClU,OQ
D* Jr,q. l!l!l11
-
Parcel Layout
Reviled 9/21/99
City of Monticello, Minnesota
\0
TOTAL P. 02
,i>'-' ___
\~~' ' /,<~\~, - =......-- --...... --<~:..~-~:-<-.---~~:-- -
I \' . '~ :----;;u_~ .- , .-"
-~?~~~~~- ~-_/-:~:~~-
. .---_.- ...... .--,;.-_.. ..-~ ,'.
- ..._----~;::-__=___~ _ -"f'~---
-.----~. U \ 'I .
.~"~;S-r'~ \,"r.___ --\ \ ....4-
\ \ ,-", ':;, ~- \ \ ~C
Ii \', 'l \ 1996 ADT 19 ~:. .<',
,,~.,.:3 j"', ~. \~ \ ,600
~..i@O' \" \,-~~~'20J8 ADT 35 720 '"
.' 1 1 B \ " i;<. ~,6 \ '
\,-:...~l'~': \ \
. ~ f \ ":!to.... _ . .co
\ \ ...-- . ?i~~ \ \, 1.:,'
~"\ ~ f"\"~j \, \ \
I \ '._----~..........-- \"., \
15 m R \ .,\ \
(
'?-~
~~
'\
"
-,~.\.
)
@
153.
... , . : '. ,. --....-. ..:,;....~--_:'-..-----.:... .
.......,~-------.-~#I-'--'~~'-'-'-- - . ~
.,eo
,~"~..
~
....
..
,...
u,.
':"'"-----
-,"-
~ .
~i
L:'~
~
:--'e-'~'~~--~~
-'.
@
::'
------,..-.-
CLOSED IN 5 YEARS
JCTION OR IF SAFETY.
rs.
, I :
~
~
~
~~
p;
.
,
\
,
\
\
\
\
, ~--"'
i....... I ,..,
=\~--:..... -
.
\
\
\
\ '.-'1
,: \ _~._:::-~~ i
OB ,~-. /, ~
"":;" U~~_.AD~-C HRl
CUL:PB"~~c~!.-GO ,..- - nON
_,_ ....._ornmtSE-A <,,'
;K- /-'" ,/'~ ". 10
..... ""..,"" - ....-' ~".,.. \
-I
r---:-, ~:TJ
.0:
From:
City of Monticello
Alvin Mielke, Adium Marketing
Dan Mielke, Mielke Brothers LLC
Offer to purchase Remnant Parcel
8/17/99
Re:
Date:
We are looking at a 3 to 4 million dollar property development project as illustrated on the enclosed
footprint (attachment 1).
To properly layout this project, we would like to acquire the small irregularly shaped 12,420 sq. fl. remnant
parcel (attachment 2). This small remnant originally desigoStcd as a retaining pond was created by the
alignment and construction of Chelsea Rd east off of hwy 25 S.
A Monticello city water line currently runs under the property line between the remnant and our property.
Our offer to purchase the referenced remnant is $37,260.00 ($3.00 per sq. ft.) + one contingency-
In the event any portion of the referenced city water line needs to be moved due to construction of any
structures requiring its movement, the city water line is to be moved by the city at its own expense. The
movement of the water line is to be coordinated with the construction project requiring its movement.
~ offer of$3.00 per sq.:ft. for the remnant is the same price per sq. ft. the city paid AIvin.{Adium Marketing)
. the 6,508 sq. ft. of his property needed by the city to satisfy its obligation to provide SUBWAY its new
access.
Acceptance of our offer.
1. provides the city $37,260.00
2. puts the remnant on the tax. roles
3. allows for significant property development
4. city does not have to maintain it
.
\cJ
MONTICELLO
r--... -.:;;00.,. '-/ .r: <<T"'"--.. ~ + ~ ~ n ~
P.O. BOX 68 MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA 55362
lORD · MERCURY 295-2056 TOLLFREEBOO-450-2056
September 23, 1999
City Council
City of Monticello
250 East Broadway
Monticello, Minnesota 55362
The parcel of land at the intersection of Cedar Street and Chelsea Road, designated parcel
28R, has been discussed before your body on several occasions. At your last meeting I
provided you with a conditional offer to buy this land subject to various concerns.
Having resolved those concerns I want to make the following offer for the purchase of
the parcel.
The amount of$4.25 per square foot will be paid for the parcel. The current area is now
defined as 13,949 square feet. With verification of this area, our offer would be
$59,283.25. The twenty-foot easement along the northern edge of the property could be
moved at the total expense of the party (the city or myself) who wishes the utilities to be
. relocated. At present I have no intention of relocating these services.
This offer expires ten days from the city council meeting held on September 27, 1999 at
the end of the business day (Thursday, October 7, 1999 at 5:00 pm).
I enclose a check for $1,000.00 as earnest money to demonstrate my good faith to the
City of Monticello.
so:~
David B. Peterson
.
See us at our Website www.monticelloford.com10
.
.
Council Agenda - 09/27/99
11.
Consideration of an ordinance amendment regulating solicitors. peddlers. and transient
merchants. (R W)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
The City's current ordinance regulating transient merchants has been modifIed a few times in the
past to address the issue of allowing vegetable ffi1d garden produce to be sold during the summer
months. The original transient merchant ordinance attempted to require that an individual or
business attempting to sell merchandise in the city limits needed to conduct their activity on
private property, and not within the city boulevard or right-of-way. The ordinance requires that
permission be obtained from the property owner and that the activity be conducted in the proper
commercial business zone. Finally, the ordinance required trffi1sient merchants to obtain a permit
at a cost of $50 per day. An exception was made lor produce stands during the summer months
whereby the daily fee was reduced to $10.
Although our ordinance made a couple of references to solicitors and peddlers in its text, the city
staff has taken the position that this ordinance was intended to regulate transient merchant
operations from a specific location, not the individual door to door peddling or solicitation. There
have been a number of court cases that have indicated prohibiting peddlers, solicitors and transient
merchants entirely could be construed as unconstitutional. Many communities have simply
required registration through the city for soliciting, which is proposed in our ordinance
amendment. Although I do bclieve that peddlers can be required to obtain a permit, I believe the
enforcement of this could be difficult and I question whether there would be suflicient benefits in
attempting to obtain a permit fee from a peddler. Simply requiring registration of peddlers or
solicitors who go door to door will at least give the city a record of who is out soliciting or
peddling products and could reduce the risks of scam artists as the city will know who each
person is and how to contact them should a citizen have a complaint.
If the Council would prefer to add peddlers to the permitting process, information I have obtained
from the League of Minnesota Cities indicates that we could establish a permitting process and fee
schedule for this activity as defined in our definition section. Although some solicitors may also
be selling merchandise door to door, their products are delivered at a later time and because of
interstate commerce laws, it becomes more questionable whether a permit can be required of this
group.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
.
1. The Council could adopt the ordinance mnendment as proposed that would require the
registration of any peddler or solicitor including religious and charitable organizations and
it would continue the process of permitting transient merchants.
2.
The Council could direct staff to prepare an amendment to our transient merchant
ordinance that would also require peddlers to be permitted with solicitors being required
to register before going door to door.
This option would allow thc Council to also establish a daily or annual fee for any peddler
.
.
.
Council Agenda - 09/27/99
as part of the permitting process in addition to the transient merchant fee that is already
established on a daily basis.
3.
Do not amend the transient merchant ordinance at this time.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is the recommendation of the City Administrator that the ordinance amendment be adopted
that will require peddlers and solicitors in the future to register with the City prior to conducting
their activities. If in the future the City receives numerous complaints of peddlers and solicitors
becoming a problem, the Council could then look at requiring daily or annual permit fees to
discourage peddlers. I don't believe it has necessarily been a problem so far in that the permitting
of transient merchants is appropriate and should continue in its present format with daily fees
and permitting being required.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
· Copy of proposed ordinance amendment
.
SECTION:
3 -10-1:
3-10-2:
3-10-3:
3-10-4:
3-10-5:
3-10-6:
3 -10- 7:
3-10-8:
3-10-9:
3-10-10:
3 -10-11:
3 -1 0- 1 2:
3-10-13:
3-10-1:
.
.
CHAPTER 10
TRANSIENT MERCHANTS, SOLICITORS AND PEDDLERS
Definition
Permit Required
Exemptions
Application
Reeistration
Religious and Charitable Organizations, Exemption
I nvestigation and Issuance
Duty of City Administrator to Enforce
Revocation of License
Appeal
Reapplication
Expiration of Permit
Penalty
DEFINITION: When used in this ordinance, the following term has the following
meanmg:
(A) "Transient merchant" includes any person, firm, or corporation, whether as
owner, agent, consignee, or employee, who engages in a temporary
business (five days or less per month) of selling and delivering goods,
wares, and merchandise, or buying and receiving goods, wares, and
merchandise within the city and who, in furtherance of such purpose,
hires, leases, uses, or occupies any building, structure, motor vehicle,
trailer, tent, railroad boxcar, boat, public room in hotels, lodging houses,
apartments, shops, or any street, alley, or other place within the city for the
exhibition and sale of such goods, wares, and merchandise either privately
or at public auction, provided that such definition does not include any
person, firm, or corporation who, while occupying such temporary
location, does not sell from stock but exhibits samples for the purpose of
securing orders for future delivery only. Location utilized by transient
merchants shall be consistent with uses identified as permitted in
particular zoning district and adequate off-street parking is available.
(#243, 10/11/93)
ill}
A peddler shall mean a person who goes from house to house. door to
door. business to business. street to street. or any other type of place to
place. for the purpose of offering for sale. displavinl! or exposinl! for sale.
selline or attemotinl! to sell. and deliverin~ immediately uPon sale. the
l!oods. wares. products. merchandise. or other oersonal property. that the
person is canl'ine or otherwise transporting. The term peddler shall mean
the same as the term hawker.
l \
.
.
......
,.,
3-10-2:*
(g
A solicitor shall mean a person who goes from house to house. door to
door. business to business, street to street. or any other type of place to
place. for the purpose of obtaining or attempting to obtain orders for
goods. wares, products. merchandise or other personal property. or
services. of which he or she may be carryint: or transporting samples,
or that may be described in a catalof:ue or bv other means, and for which
deliverv or performance shall occur at a later time. The term solicitor
shall mean the same as the term canvasser.
PERMIT REQUIRED: It is unlawful for any transient merchant to engage in any such
business within the City of Monticello without first obtaining a permit thcre1'eJre in
compliance with the provisions of this ordinance.
(A) A daily permit shall be required for any "transient merchant" as defined in Section
3-10-1(A).
1.
An annual permit which may be issued only to the owner or proprietor of a
private premise such as motel, hotel, shopping mall, banquet facility,
service club, etc., wherein a transient merchant as defined in Section 3-10-
1 (A) may lease or otherwise occupy space to engage in said temporary
business. An applicant for an annual permit must provide the City with
assurances that each transient merchant engaged in business upon his/her
premise meets the minimum requirements of this ffild all other applicable
ordinance.
2. The transient merchant shall operate from within a permanent structure on
the premise. Outdoor sales from parking lots or other open space is hereby
prohibited under the provisions of the annual permit.
3. No holder of an annual permit shall allow in excess of 12 vendors, stands,
booths, or similar sales area to operate per day without the written
permissions of the City Council.
(B) FEES: Fees shall be set and adopted by the City Council as follows:
1. Daily permit fees.
2.
Daily permit fees for a permit issued to a transient merchant under the
authority of the annual permit, said fees to be collected by the holder of an
annual permit and remitted to the City Administrator prior to the conduct
of any business, **exceot that transient merchants conducting their
business within the confines of the commons area of any shopping mall
shall not be required to remit a daily fee.
3. Annual permit fees.
2
.
.
a
.,
3-10-3:
*(#129,11/14/83)
**(#131, 1/23/84)
(C)
PERMISSION OF PROPERTY OWNER REQUIRED:
1. No transient merchant shall sell or offer for sale any goods, wares, or
merchandise within the city from a stationary location or public or private
property without first obtaining the written consent of the property owner
or occupant.
2. No transient merchant license shall be issued for sales from any location
which does not have sufficient parking for clIstomers and for areas where
customer parking would interfere with normal tramc flow.
3. Only one (1) transient merchant license shall be issued per location
(property owner) at any given time.
(#194,8/13/90)
EXEMPTIONS: This chapter does not apply to the following:
(A)
Vendors of milk, groceries, bakery products, or other perishable commodities; or
vendors of soft water service or laundry and dry cleaning pickup and delivery who
make an uninvited call upon the occupant of a resident as a preliminary step to the
establishment of a regular route service for the sale and delivery of such
commodities or the providing of such services to regular customers; or for the sale
of goods, merchandise, or services to business, commercial, or industrial users at
their place of business.
(B) Sidewalk sales authorized by the City Council.
(C) Limited open sales and limited rummage/garage sales. (See Permitted Accessory
Sales, Chapter 6, Section 3, of the Zoning Ordinance for regulations governing
open sales and rummage/garage sales.)
(#209,5/13/91)
(D) Any bona fide auction sale by a city resident.
(E) Any sale tmder court order.
(F) The sale of regularly published newspapers.
(0)
The sale of goods or merchandise on behalf of bona fide charitable, religious,
civic, education, or political organization subject to provisions of 3-1 0-2(C) and
3-10-5.
(H) Sale of farm or garden fruits and vegetables from June 15 through September 15
3
.
.
..-..
......
3-10-4:
3-10-5:
subject to the provisions of 3-1O-2(C) and the daily permit fees cstabl ished by
Council.
(#310, 6/8/98)
(#194,8/13/90)
APPLlCA TION: Applicants for a transient merchant permit under this ordinance shall
file with the City Clerk a sworn application in writing on a form to be furnished by the
City Clerk. The application shall give the following information:
(A) Name and physical description of applicant;
(B) Complete permanent home and local address of the applicant and, in the case of
transient merchants, the local address from which proposed sales will be made;
(C) A brief description of the nature of the business and the goods to be sold;
(D) The name and address of the employer, principal, or supplier of the applicant
together with credentials therefrom establishing the exact relationship;
(E) The length of time for which the right to do business is desired;
(F) General description of items to be sold;
(G)
The names of at least two property owners of Wright County, MilUlesota, who
will certify as to the applicant's good character and business respectability or, in
lieu of the names of references, such other available evidence as to the good
character and business responsibility of the applicant as will enable an
investigator to properly evaluate such character and business responsibility;
(H) The last municipalities, not to exceed three, where applicant carried on business
immediately preceding date of application and the addresses from which such
business was conducted in those municipalities;
(I) At the time of filing the application, a fee of $3 .50 shall be paid to the City Clerk
to cover the cost of investigation of the facts stated therein plus a fee schedule
adopted by the City Counci I.
(#107, 11/23/81)
(#194,8/13/90)
REGISTRATION REOUIRED: All peddlers and solicitors shall be required
to reeister with the City. Registration shall be made on a form supplied bv the
City Clerk. but no fee shall be required. The application shall eive the followin~
information:
A.
B.
Name of aPDHcant(s).
Complete permanent home and local address of the applicant(s).
4
.
E.
F.
G.
c.
A brief description of the nature of the business and the goods to be
offered for sale or to be sold or the purpose of the solicitation.
Name and address of the employer, principal, or supplier for the
applicant,or the name of the organization the applicant is representing.
The length of time for which the reeistration applies to.
The general description of any items to be sold or distributed.
The last municipalities, not to exceed three, where applicant has carried
on a similar business actiyity or solicitation immediately preceding the
date of application.
D.
Upon completion of the required registration form, the City Clerk shall issue to
the registrant a signed copy of the registration form as proof of the applicants
registration. The applicant shall shall be required to carry with them a copy of the
registration while conducting solicitation or during the peddling of merchandise.
3-10-6:
RELIGIOUS AND CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONS, EXEMPTION: Any
organization, society, association, or corporation desiring to solicit or to have solicited in
its name money, donations of money or property, or financial assistance of any kind, or
desiring to sell or distribute any item of literature or merchandise for which a fee is
charged or solicited from persons other than members of such organizations upon the
streets, in office or business buildings, by house-to-house canvass, or in public places for
a charitable, religious, patriotic, or philanthropic purpose shall be exempt from the
provisions of Section 4 of this ordinance provided there is filed a sworn application in
writing on a form to be furnished by the City Clerk which shall give the following
information:
.
(A) Name and purpose of the cause for which permit is sought;
(B) Names and addresses of the officers and directors of the organization;
(C) Period during which solicitation is to be carried on;
(D) Whether or not any commission, fee, wages, or emoluments are to be expended in
connection with such solicitation and the amount thereof.
3-10-7:
Upon being satisfied that such organization, association, or corporation is a
religious, charitable, patriotic, or philanthropic organization, the Clerk shall issue
a permit without charge to such organization, association, or corporation to solicit
in the city. Such organization, association, or corporation shall furnish all of its
members, agents, or representatives conducting solicitation credentials in writing
stating the name of the organization, name of agent, and purpose of solicitation.
INVESTIGATION AND ISSUANCE:
.
(A)
Upon receipt of each application, it shall be referred to the City Administrator,
who will immediately institute such investigation of the applicant's business
5
.
.
.
3-10-8:
3-10-9:
and moral character as he deems necessary for the protection of the public
good and shall endorse the application in the manner prescribed in this section
within 72 hours after it has been filed by the applicant with the City.
(B)
lf~ as a result of such investigation, the applicant's character or business
responsibility is found to be unsatisfactory, the City Administrator shall
endorse on such application his disapproval and reasons for the same and
notify the applicant that his application is disapproved and that no permit will
be issued.
(C)
If, as a result of such investigation, the character and business responsibility of
the applicant are found to be satisfactory, the City Administrator shall endorse
on the application his approval and deliver to the applicant his permit. Such
permit shall contain the signature of the issuing officer and shall show the
name and address of said permittee, the class of permit issued and the kinds of
goods to be sold thereunder, the date of issuance and the length of time not to
exceed one year from the date of issuance that the same shall be operative, as
well as the permit number and other identifying description of any vehicle
used in such licensed business.
Each fH:ddler, solicitor, 6r transient merchant must secure a personal permit.
No permit shall be used at any time by any person other than the one to whom
it is issued. The Clerk shall keep a permanent record of all permits issued.
DUTY OF CITY ADMINISTRATOR TO ENFORCE: It shall be the duty of the City
Administrator to require any person seen peddling, soliciting, or canvassing, and who
is not known by such City Administrator to have obtained a permit hereunder, to
produce his permit and to enforce the provisions of this ordinance against any person
found to be violating the same.
REVOCATION OF LICENSE:
(A) Permits issued under the provisions of this ordinance may be revoked by the
City Administrator for any of the following causes:
1. Fraud, misrepresentation, or incorrect statement contained in the
application for permit;
2. Fraud, misrepresentation, or incorrect statement made in the course of
carrying on his business as solicitor, canvasser, peddler, transient
merchant, itinerant merchant, or itinerant vendor;
3. Any violation of this ordinance;
4.
Conviction of any crime or misdemeanor;
6
.
.
.
3-10-10:
3-10-11:
3-10-12:
3-10-13:
5.
Conducting the business of peddler, canvasser, solicitor, transient
merchant, itinerant merchant, or itinerant vendor, as the case may be,
in an unlawful manner or in such a manner as to constitute a breach of
peace or to constitute a menace to health, safety, or general welfare of
the public.
APPEAL: Any person aggrieved by the action of the City Administrator or the City
Clerk in the denial of a permit or revocation may appeal to the Council. Such appeal
shall be taken by filing with the Council within fourteen days after notice of the action
complained of and a written statement setting forth fully the grounds for the appeal.
The Council shall set a time and place for a hearing on such appeal, and notice of such
hearing shall be given to the appellant.
REAPPtJCArION: No permittee whose permit has been revoked shall make further
application until at least six months have elapsed since the last previous revocation.
EXPIRATION OF PERMIT: All annual permits issued under the provisions of this
ordinance shall expire at midnight the 31 st day of December in the year when issued.
Other than annual licenses shall expire at midnight on the date specified in the license.
PENAL TY: Any person who violates any provision of this ordinance is gui Ity of a
misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be punished by a fine not exceeding
$500 or by imprisonment for a period not exceeding 90 days or both, plus in either
case the costs of prosecution.
(#97,4/13/81)
7
.
.
.
Council Agenda - 09/27/99
12. Consideration of establishinl! a process for the sale of senior citizens facility. (R W)
A.
REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
With the senior citizens scheduled to move into the new community center around the first of the year, the
existing facility on Cedar Street would no longer have a public use and could be sold. As part of our
financing expectations for the new community center, it was assumed that both city hall and the senior
citizen building would be put back on the tax roll.
In anticipation of an upcoming sale, I had two appraisals completed on the existing building that the
Council can review. Recently the City has received a couple of inquiries concerning this property and we
should therefore decide how we want to market the property. It would also be beneficial to establish an
asking price to enable staff to respond to future inquiries, if we do not simply list the property with a
realtor. Financing terms are also an issue that the Council may want to consider, such as a contract for
deed or the Council may want to only sell the property for cash.
Summaries of the appraisal were provided to the Council under separate cover and these may be useful
for the Council to determine what approach you may want to use for marketing the properties.
B.
ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. The Council could establish an asking price based on appraisals obtained and authorize
staff to bring back any purchase agreements on the property.
2. The Council could authorize the property to be listed by a local real estate finn.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
If an asking price can be established, I would not have a problem with the City staff advertising the
property for sale and bringing to the Council any purchase proposals. From an exposure standpoint, it is
possible that listing it with a real estate firm will gives us a broader market exposure. If we attempt to sell
a property ourselves, we should place an attractive for sale sign on the property as soon as possible after
an agreed upon price has been determined. As you may be aware, parking on site is very limited and I do
not believe additional parking can be accommodated on site. Any use of the property would have to
utilize street parking as its primary source.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Nothing other than appraisal summaries provided earlier.
- - - .- .
8RC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
09/10/1999 12:09:38
.
Payments for Publication
CITY OF MONTICELLO
GL050S-V06.00 COVERPAGE
GL335R
Report Selection:
Aoproval Date...................... 09/27/1999
Cutoff Amount to be Used...........
Payments Through Date.............. 08/31/1999
RUN GROUP... 00831
COMMENT... ADOLFSON CHECK 8/31
-------------- ------------------------
DATA-JE-ID DATA COMMENT
M-08311999-055 ADOLFSON CHECK
Run Instructions:
Jobo Banner COpies Form Printer Hold Soace LPI Lines CPI
J 01 N S 6 066 10
.
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
9/10/1999 12:09:39
.
.
Approved on
Vendor Name
- - .- ,.- ,,- -- .- -
-. -._-"- .-.- ---
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Payments for Publication GL335R-V06.00 PAGE
9/27/1999 for Payments Through 8/31/1999
ADOLFSON & PETERSON. INC
Description Amount
**
-'--'- - -
WWTP PYMT #26
Final Totals...
- -- - - - -
135.182.00
135.182.00
- -, .- -- ,_., -.
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
~09/10/1999 12:09:40
FUND RECAP:
Payments for Publication
FUND DESCRIPTION
----------------------------
DISBURSEMENTS
436
93-14C WWTP EXPANSION PRJ
TOTAL ALL FUNDS
135.182.00
135.182.00
BANI'< RECAP:
BANK NAME
----------------------------
DISBURSEMENTS
GENL GENERAL CHECKING
TOTAL ALL BANKS
135.182.00
135.182.00
~
-- '=----......_, - ==---- -_.
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
09/15/1999 14:57:31
.
Pavmen~s Tor PUblication
Reoort Selection:
,,,"-oarova!
Date. . . . . .
D9/27/1999
.. . .. .. . .. " . ~ ~ .. ~ .. ~ , ..
Payments Through Date.............. 09/16/1999
Cutoff Amount to be Used........ _..
RllN GROll P . .. DO 916
COMMENT. . .
9/16 CHECKS
OATA-JE-ID DATA COMMENT
------.-------- --------~-----------~--_.
0-09161999-058 9/16 CKS
Run Instructions;
Joba Banner Cooies Form Printer Hold SOace LPI
J 01 N S 6
.
.
--- .._-'"
CITY OF MONTICELLO
GL050S-Y06.GO COYERPAGE
GL335R
Lines CPI
066 10
3RC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
9/15/1999 14:57:32
.
-- - -. - "-'-.
,4opr'oved on
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Payments tor Publication GL335R-V06.00 PAGE
9/27/1999 ~or Payments Through 9/16/1999
Vendol~ Name
AFFORDABLE SANITATION
BARTON SAND & GRAVEL CO.
BELLBOY CORPORATION BAR SUPPLY
BERNICK'S PEPSI COLA COMPANY
BERTELSON OFFICE SUPPLIES
CEDAR ST, GARDEN CENTER
CHAMPION AMERICA INC.
CLARK FOOD SERVICE, INC,
COMMERCIAL ASPHALT COMPANY
CULLIG.Ll.N
CUMMINS NORTH CENTRAL INC.
DAHLHEIMER DISTRIBUTING CO
DAY DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
DISCOUNT PAPER PRODUCTS, INC.
EARL F ANDERSON & ASSOCIATES
EHLERS & ASSOC,INC PU8LICORP
GARTNER'S OFFICE PRODUCTS
GRIGGS, COOPER & COMPANY
GROSSLEIN BEVERAGE INC.
HARRY'S AUTO SUPPLY
~AWKINS WATER TREATMENT GROUP
HENRY & ASSOCIATES
~OGLUND TRANSPORTATION
HOLLAND STUMP REMOVAL
JME OF MONTICELLO
JOHNSON BROS WHOLESALE LIQUOR
~EN ANDERSON TRUCKING
KENNEDY & GRAVEN, CHARTERED
i\I NC3/ J .AMES W
M.B.P.
~IRACLE RECREATION EQUIP CO.
MONTICELLO PRINTING
MOON MOTOR SALES, INC.
NATIONAL BUSHING PARTS & CO.
N ET,SOU RCE
OHNST,A.D/ELMER
ONE CALL CONCEPTS. INC.
PEARSON BROS. INC.
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS CO
PHOTO I
,::>IPELINE SUPPLY, INC.
RELIABLE CORPORATION/THE
F\EL I ANT EN ERGY
RICHARD KNUTSON. INC.
RON'S GOURMET ICE
RUFFRIDGE JOHNSON EQUIPMENT
SA.A f~ ION/CARL
SAFETY-KLEEN CORP.
.
- - -., - -- - -. -.. - - -
Description Amount
rOILET RENTALS/PARKS
PARKS
CIGS
BEER
COMP RI88S0NS/C HALL
ADOPT A PARK/TREES
:3 I GNS/ PA.RKS
CITY HALL SUPPLIES
STREETS
RENT.A.L HOUSE
WATER DEPT REPAIRS
BEER
SEER
PAPER/OFF SUP
STREETS
TOF '!-26
CITY HALL OFFICE SUP
l..I OUOR
BEER
PARKS
WATER SUPPLIES
W.A.TER SUPPLIES
HEARTLAND EXPRESS CHS
STUMP REMOV.A:'"
cIRE DEPT REPAIRS
LI OUOR
ANIMAL DISPOSAL FEES
TIP 1-23
RIVERSIDE CMTY LAWN MTC
STREET FUEL
PLAYGROUND EOUIP/PARKS
F'IRE DEPT
STREETS
P.A,RKS
copy PAPER/C HALL
M I LE.A.GE RE I Me
LOCA.TES
SE.A.LCO,A. T I NG
U OUOR
WWTP EXP
DARKS
CITY HALL SUPPLIES
UTII_ITlES
PYMT #4 7THST CONST
ICE
STREETS
PICNIC TASLES/SENCHES/PK
MTC EQUIPMENT/STRTS
428.73
3.09
3,280.76
529..80
122_99
552.14
90.55
94.06
164.15
24.92
62.2:;
4,833.79
'1,505 _ -15
215.02
24 L 01
420.00
41 .64
7.979.29
2.974.51
374_92
2.979.05
191.57
5.624.30
326.38
70.59
1,691.81
115.50
1.306_29
1,453.73
588.84
",471.58
160.39
97.71
65.52
297.59
77.00
180.00
49,885.32
532.78
115.21
207.87
114.34
199_38
51.471.48
229.66
710.46
703.39
82.96
aRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
9/15/1999 14:57:32
.
-
-,._----
._~-,~
.A.oproved on
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Payments for Publication GL335R-V06.00 PAGE
9/27/1999 for Payments Through 9/16/1999
Vendor Name
SCHARBER & SONS. INC.
SCHLUENDER CONSTRUCTION INC
SERVICEMASTER BY HICKMAN
SMOLNIK ELECTRIC
SPECIALTY SEEDS. INC
TDS TELECOM
THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
TOP NOTCH CONSTRUCTION CLEANER
fRI-STATE PUMP & CONTROL. INC.
US FILTER DISTRIBUTION GROUP
VIKING COCA COLA
VOSS LIGHTING
WATER LABORATORIES. INC
WRIGHT-HENNEPIN COOP ELEC ASSO
.*'1<
.
Descriotion
PA.RK REPAI RS
F I LL/COMM CTR:
CARPET CLEANING/F DEPT
COMMUNITY CTR
PARKS
TELEPHONE CHGS
8EER
WINDOW CLEANING/C HALL
SEWER LIFT STATION REP
WATER
POP
LI GH T 8U L 8S
WATER
UTILITIES
:::ina] Tota 1s. . .
Amount
252.61
165.00
178.92
1.188.14
614.00
3.064.94
7.011.15
375.00
2.560.23
805.92
159.45
194.67
20.00
1 3 . 1 0
161.498.58
aRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
09/15/1999 14:57:32
.
FUND RECAP;
Payments tor Publication
=UND DESCRIPTION
'J 0 '1
2 1 1
2 "13
224
225
240
(~:3 6
450
46i
462
(,167
50 'I
602
609
510
651
----------------------------
DISBURSEMENTS
GENERAL FUND
LIBRARY FUND
H Ri.\' FUN D
SHADE TREE FUND
PA.RK FUN D
CAPITAL PROJECT REVOLVING FD
93-14C WWTP EXPANSION PRJ
96-04C HWY25/MNOOT IMPR
98-03C COMMUNITY CENTER
98-12C 7TH STREET EXTENSION
98-17C CSAH 75/E BROW IMPR
WATER FUND
SEWER FUND
MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND
TRANSPORTATION FUND
RIVERSIDE CEMETERY
36,762~25
98 L 54
'1,518.10
326.38
23,640.06
24.92
5"1. 19
9~97
1,353.14
51,471.48
23. 16
4,279~42
2,918.46
31,395.96
5,624.30
1.118.25
TOTAL A.LL FUNDS
.
161,498.58
BANK RECAP;
3AN I~ NAME
----------------------------
DISBURSEMENTS
3ENL GENERAL CHECKING
LIOR LIQUOR CHECKING
130,102.62
31,395.96
rOTA,L ALL BANI\S
.
161,498.58
-.---. - - -.--- - -,_.. -., -. - .-
.--- ------- --------------------
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
09/22/1999 14:38:22
.
Paymen~s for PUblication
CITY OF MONTICELLO
GL050S-V06.00 COVERPAGE
GL335R
Report Selection:
Payments Through Date.............. 09/23/1999
Approval Date...................... 09/27/1999
Cutoff Amount to be Used... ........
RUN GROUP. '. D0923
COMMENT. " 9/23 CHECKS
DATA-JE-ID DATA COMMENT
D-09221999-095 9/23/99 CKS
-------------- ------------------------
Run Instructions:
Jobq Banner COPies Form Printer Hold Space LPI Lines CPI
J 01 N S 6 066 10
.
- - - ~,-,_. -,- - - - -'- ---.--
- - - -,-- - --
BRc FINANCIAL SYSTEM
9/22/1999 14:38:23
.
Approved on
Payments tor Publication
9/27/1999 for Payments Through
Vendor Name
A T & T WIRELESS SERVICE
ACS
ARAMARK
AUTOMATION SUPPLY COMPANY
B & H HEATING & COOLING
BARCO MUNICIPAL PRODUCTS, INC.
BARR ENGINEERING COMPANY
BERNICK's PEPSI COLA COMPANY
CELLULAR 2000 OF ST CLOUD
COMMERCIAL ASPHALT COMPANY
COMPRESS AIR & EQUIPMENT CO.
DAHLHEIMER DISTRIBUTING CO
DAY DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
DESIGN FOR PRINT STUDIO
DONLAR CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
FLESCH'S PAPER SERVICES, INC
GLOBAL EUIPMENT COMPANY
GLUNZ/RAYMOND J
GME CONSULTANTS, INC.
GROSSLEIN BEVERAGE INC.
HAKANSON ANDERSON ASSOC., INC
HDR ENGINEERING, INC.
HOME JUICE
HUBERT COMPANY
JOHNSON BROS WHOLESALE LIQUOR
K MART STORE
MAINSTREET DESIGNS, INC
MAJIRS! ADVERTISING & DESIGN
MCDOWALL COMPANY
MN STATE TREASURER
MONTICELLO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
MONTICELLO COMMUNITY PARTNERS
O'NEILL/JEFF
OLSON & SONS ELECTRIC, INC.
PATCH/FRED
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS CO
PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING
PIPELINE SUPPLY, INC.
PITNEY BOWES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GROUP
RELIABLE CORPORATION/THE
TAYLOR LAND SURVEYORS INC.
THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
U SLINK
Us FILTER DISTRIBUTION GROUP
VIKING COCA COLA
W S DARLEY & COMPANY
WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC
.
CITY OF MONTICELLO
GL335R-V06.00 PAGE
Description
9/23/1999
PHONE CHS
SRVICE AGRMT
SUPPLIES/C HALL
PAPER
FURNACE/LIBRARY/DOWN PYT
SUPPLIES/SHOP
ENG FEES/COMM CTR
BEER
PHONE CHGS
STREETS
DUE ON INVOICE 992637
BEER
BEER
NEWSLETTER PRINTING
COMM CTR PYMT
BAGS
HARD HATS/COMM CTR
DON NAGEL
COMM CTR ENG FEES
BEER
WALKING PATH FEES
WWTP ENG FEES
JUICE
SHOPPING CARTS
WINE
PW OFFICE SUPPLIES
MARKETING FROG/ECON nEVL
MARKETING PRGM/COM CTR
CITY HALL REPAIRS
CERTIFICATION RENEWAL
TRAVEL EXPENSE
MCP CONTRIBUTION
TRAVEL EXPENSE REIMB
COMM CTR COSTS
CLOTHING REIMB/F PATCH
LIQUOR
MIse
SUPPLIES
POSTAGE MACHINE RENTAL
WWTP PYMT
C HALL SUPPLIES
SURVEY FEES/KJELLBERG
BEER
WEB SITE/MAIL FEES
WATER METER
POP
HOSES/RIVER MILL PARK 1M
GARBAGE PICKUP PAYMENT
Amount
183.79
2,157.00
89.90
267.71
7,000.00
455.48
3,547.90
146.05
286.91
21.30
300.00
2,154.99
1,067.70
2,241.82
605,495.80
79.28
54.08
325.00
3,927.50
3,944.37
3,881.25
15,217.85
35.10
644.10
1,033.90
164.68
3,778.41
1,356.50
2,033.98
20.00
10.00
35,000.00
195.36
3,711.91
210.00
1,269.49
340.34
59.37
504.00
37,095.42
242.60
360.00
7,027.40
240.00
170.50
261.30
618.11
4,633.24
ERC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
9/22/1999 14:38:23
.
**
.
Approved on
Vendor Name
WATER LABORATORIES, INC
WATSON COMPANY, INC/THE
- -- ---- ~.---
-~------ -------~,---- '--.--
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Payments for PUblication GL335R-V06.00 PAGE
9/27/1999 for PaymenLs Through 9/23/1999
Description Amount
WATER TESTING
BAGS
20.00
310.30
Final Totals...
754,191.69
~---
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
09/22/1999 14:38:24
.
FUND RECAP:
Payments for Publication
FUND DESCRIPTION
101
211
225
226
240
250
436
450
461
467
601
602
609
651
----------------------------
DISBURSEMENTS
GENERAL FUND
LIBRARY FUND
PARK FUND
COMMUNITY CENTER
CAPITAL PROJECT REVOLVING FD
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTH FD
93-14C WWTP EXPANSION PRJ
96-04C HWY25/MNDOT IMPR
98-03C COMMUNITY CENTER
98-17C CSAH 75/E BROW IMPR
WATER FUND
SEWER FUND
MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND
RIVERSIDE CEMETERY
19,007.42
7,000.00
4,566.73
1,410.58
35,000.00
58.01
15,217.85
360.00
615,015.74
59.37
249.07
37,122,29
18,799.63
325.00
TOTAL ALL FUNDS
tlK
754,191.69
RECAP:
BANK NAME
----------------------------
DISBURSEMENTS
GENL GENERAL CHECKING
LIQR LIQUOR CHECKING
TOTAL ALL BANKS
735,392.06
18,799.63
754,191.69
~~~-------~-------------~~-~~- ~--
:RC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
09/13/1999 09:53:04
.
Schedule of Bills
Report Selection:
RUN GROUP... 00831 COMMENT... ADOLFSON CHECK 8/31
OATA-JE-ID
DA T A COMMEN T
-------------- ------------------------
M-08311999-055 ADOLFSON CHECK
Run Instructions;
Jobo Banner Cooies Form Printer Hold Space LPI Lines CPI
J 01 N S 6 066 10
.
-- ~ -
CITY OF MONTICELLO
GL050S-V06.00 COVERPAG:
GL540R
- - -- -. .-- ..- - .-. -... - ,.- -- - - .- - - -
3RC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
~9/13/1999 09:53:05
~NDOR NAME
DESC R I PTI ON
ADOLFSON & PETERSON, INC
WWTP PYMT #26
.
.- - - - - -.- - - - ..
- - ----.-
Schedule of Bills
AMOUNT
ACCOUNT NAME
FUND & ACCOUNT
135,182.00 PROF SRV - CONSTRUCTION 436.49201.3025
- - .- - ---
- - - -. ~- ---
CITY OF MONTICELLO
GL540R-V06.00 PAGE
CLAIM INVOICE POI F/P 10 LINE
055 00001
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
~/13/1999 09:53:06
FUND RECAP:
FUND DESCRIPTION
Schedule of Bills
DISBURSEMENTS
436 93-14C WWTP EXPANSION PRJ
TOTAL ALL FUNDS
SANK RECAP:
BANK NAME
GENL GENERAL CHECKING
TOTAL ALL BANKS
.
.
135.182.00
135,182.00
DISBURSEMENTS
135.182.00
135.182.00
THE PRECEDING LIST OF BILLS PAYABLE WAS REVIEWED AND APPROVED FOR PAYMENT.
DATE ............
APPROVED BY
CITY OF MONTICELLO
GL060S-V06.00 RECAPPAGE
GL540R
._-._-,-_. - - -
3RC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
09/15/1999 14:50:07
.
Schedule of Bills
~;TY OF MONTICELLO
GL050S-V06.00 COVERPAGE
8L540R
Reoort Selection:
~UN GROUP... D0916 COMMENT... 9/16 CHECKS
DATA-JE-ID
DATA COMMENT
~------------- ------------------------
0-09161999-058 9/16 CKS
iun Instructions:
Joba Banner Copies Form Printer Hold Soace LPI Lines CPI
01 N S 6 066 1C
.
~
~
- - --------- --.-- ----- - - - - - --._---
aRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF MONTICELLO
09/15/1999 14:50:08 Schedule of Bills GL540R-V06.00 PAGE
V.R NAME
JESCRIPTION AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME ':UND & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE POll FIP 10 LINE
AFFORDABLE SANITATION
TOIL:T RENTALS/PARKS 428.73 MISC OTHER EXPENSE 225.45201.4399 990924 058 00056
BARTON SAND & GRAVEL CO.
PARKS 3.09 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 225.45201.2199 058 00001
BELLBOY CORPORATION BAR
UOUOR 528.95 LI OUOR 509.49750.2510 17240100 058 00089
LIOUOR 1,252.60 LIOUOR 609.49750.251C 17275200 058 00091
eIGS 1,288.00 MISC TAXABLE 509.49750.2540 2203800 058 00088
eIGS 158.16 MISC TAXABLE 609.49750.2540 26900 058 00090
CREDIT lU6CR MISC TAXABLE 509.49750.2540 30394600 058 00087
MIX 64.81 MISC TAXABLE 609.49750.2540 30479300 058 00092
3,280.76 "VENDOR TOTAL
BERNICK'S PEPSI COLA COM
BEER 529.80 BEER 509.49750.2520 57489 058 00096
BERTELSON OFFICE SUPPLIE
COMP RIBBSONS/C HALL 122.99 DATA PROCESSING SUPPLIES 101.41920.2025 6924670 058 00055
Cl!II!S" GARDEN CENTER
SIPARKS 28.11 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 225.45201.2199 3143 058 00134
A OPT A PARK/TREES 524.03 IMPROVEMENTS 225.45201.530', 3233 058 00135
552.14 *VENDOR TOTAL
CHAMPION AMERICA INC.
SIGNSIPARKS 90.55 BUILDING REPAIR SUPPLIES 225.45201.2230 402728 058 oe068
CLARK FOOD SERVICE, INC.
CITY HALL SUPPLIES 94.06 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES '!01.41940.2199 058 00007
COMMERCIAL ASPHALT COMPA
STREETS 164.15 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 101.43120.2199 058 00006
CULLIGAN
mH AL HOUSE 24.92 RENTAL HOUSE EXPENSES 240.49201.4381 058 00008
CUMMINS NORTH CENTRAL IN
WATER DEPT REPAIRS 62.23 REPAIR & MTC - MACH & EO 601.49440.4044 100-87390 058 00073
DAHLHEIMER DISTRIBUTING
BALANCE DUE 15.90 BEER 609.49750.2520 510031 058 00081
MISC TAX 196.30 MISe TAXABLE 609.49750.2540 52595 058 00084
BEER 2.501.25 BEER 609.49750.2520 52596 058 00086
BEER 36.55 BEER 609.49750.2520 52976 058 00083
. TAX 2.054.99 BEER 509.49750.2520 52994 058 00082
28.80 MISC TAXABLE 609.49750.2540 52995 058 00085
4.833.79 *VENDOR TOTAL
-- -'--,-- --',---- --,---
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF MONTICELLO
09/15/1999 14:50:08 Scneaule of 8ills GL540R-V06.00 PAGE 2
V.R NAME
JESCRIPTION AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME :=UND & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE PO# F/P ID LINE
DAY DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
BEER 1.466.75 BEER 509.49750.2520 11059 058 00100
MIS TAX 38.40 MISC TAXABLE 609.49750.2540 71059 058 00101
1,505.15 *VENDOR TOTAL
DISCOUNT PAPER PRODUCTS,
PAPE.R/OFF SUP 215.02 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES 609.49754.2099 224841 058 00102
EARL F ANDERSON & ASSOCI
STREETS 247.01 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 101.43120.2199 058 00009
EHLERS & ASSOC,INC PUBLI
TOF ;-26 183.75 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 213.46526.3199 16385 058 00077
TIF 1-23 MISC CHGS 105.00 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 213.46523.3199 16467 058 00074
MISC GENERAL CHGS 52.50 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 213.46301.3199 16467 058 00075
TOF 1-26 78.75 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 213.46526.3199 16467 058 00076
420.00 *VENDOR TOTAL
GARTNER'S OFFICE PRODUCT
CITY HALL OFFICE SUP 28.96 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES 101.41301.2099 058 00010
DEP REG OFFICE SUPPLIES 12.68 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES 101.41990.2099 058 00011
. 41.64 *VENDOR TOTAL
GRIGGS, COOPER & COMPANY
FREIGHT 46.50 FREIGHT 609.49750.3330 100846 058 00110
LI OUOR 5,707.90 L10UOR 609.49750.2510 100846 058 00111
cREIGrlT 1. 50 FREIGHT 609.49750.3330 104143 058 00114
MIX TAX 50.74 MISC TAXABLE 609.49750.2540 104143 058 00115
fREIGHT 13.50 FREIGHT 509.49750.3330 104144 058 00118
LI OUOR 1,802.49 L10UOR 609.49750.2510 104144 058 00119
WINE 103.80 WINE 609.49750.2530 104549 058 00116
FREIGHT 2.25 FREIGHT 609.49750.3330 104549 058 00117
WINE 283.11 WINE 609.49750.2530 104550 058 00112
FREIGHT 6.00 FREIGHT 609.49750.3330 104550 058 00113
CRED:T DUE 38.50CR LIQUOR 609.49750.2510 117993 058 00120
7,979.29 *VENDOR TOTAL
3ROSSLEIN BEVERAGE INC.
BEER 2,974.51 BEER 509.49750.2520 174229 058 00099
lARRY'S AUTO SUPPLY
SEWER 48.27 EOUIPMENT REPAIR PARTS 502.49490.2210 058 00028
STREETS 80.75 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 101.43127.2199 058 00029
PARKS 88.94 VEHICLE REPAIR PARTS 225.45201.2211 058 00030
STREETS 39.37 VEHICLE REPAIR PARTS 101.43120.2211 058 00031
SHOP 51.63 SMALL TOOLS & EOUIPMENT 101.43127.2410 058 00032
. 65.96 VEHICLE REPAIR PARTS 101.43127.221 i 058 00033
374.92 *VENDOR TOTAL
- --", -.--- ~-, --. ----~- ,-- -, -- -
~
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF MONTICELLO
09/15/1999 14:50:08 Scnedule of 8i11s GL540R-V06.00 PAGE 3
V.R NAME
OESCRI PTION AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE PO# F/P ID LINE
HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT
WATER SUPPLIES 2,974.05 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS 601.49440.2160 202996 058 00012
WA TER SUPPLI ES 5.00 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS 601.49440.216C 28126 058 00013
2.979.05 *VENDOR TOTAL
HENRY & ASSOCIATES
~.A,iER SUPPLIES 191.57 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 601.49440.2199 4381 058 00014
HOGLUND TRANSPORTATION
HEARTLAND EXPRESS CHS 5,624.30 PROF SVR - HEARTLAND BUS 610.49801.3060 25962 058 00080
HOLLAND STUMP REMOVAL
STUMP REMOVAL FEES 140.00 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 224.46102.3199 058 00015
STUMP REMOVAL 186.38 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 224.46102.3199 058 00072
326.38 *VENDOR TOTAL
JME OF MONTICELLO
cIRE DEPT REPAIRS 70.59 REPAIR & MTC - VEHICLES 101.42201.4050 058 00016
JOHNSON BROS WHOLESALE L
~ISC TAX 267.26 MISC TAXABLE 609.49750.2540 058 00108
!HT 25.50 FREIGHT 609.49750.3330 058 00109
,HT 11. 05 FREIGHT 609.49750.3330 1019567 058 00105
L OUOR 848.20 LIQUOR 609.49750.2510 1019567 058 00106
WINE 539.80 WINE 509.49750.2530 1019568 058 00107
1,691.81 *VENDOR TOTAL
KEN ANDERSON TRUCKING
ANIMAL DISPOSAL FEES 115.50 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 101.42701.3199 058 00017
KENNEDY & GRAVEN, CHARTE
GENERAL 187. 65 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 101.41910.3199 4063 058 00018
TIF 1-21 55.60 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 213.46521.3199 4063 058 00019
TIF 1-23 1,042.50 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 213.46523.3199 4063 058 00020
GENERAL 20.54 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 101.41910.3199 4063 058 00021
1,306.29 *VENDOR TOTAL
KING/JAMES W
RIVERSIDE CMTY LAWN MTC 1,118.25 PROF SRV - LAWN SERVICE 551.49010.3105 3989 058 00005
FIRE HALL LAWN MTC 79.88 PROF SRV - LAWN SERVICE 101.42201.3105 3995 058 00002
U BRARY LAWN MTC 127.80 PROF SRV - LAWN SERVICE 211.45501. 31 05 3995 058 00003
LIOUOR LAWN MTC 127.80 PROF SRV - LAWN SERVICE 609.49754.3105 3995 058 00004
1,453.73 *VENDOR TOTAL
LB. P.
STREET FUEL 588.84 MOTOR FUELS 101.43120.2120 058 00022
i~E RECREATION EQUIP
PLAYGROUND EQUIP/PARKS 1,411.58 IMPROVEMENTS 225.45201. 530 1 491189 058 00069
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF MONTICELLO
09/15/1999 14:50:08 Scheoule of 8i11s GL540R-V06.00 PAGE 4
V.R NAME
JESCRIPTION AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME 'UNO & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE POll F(P 10 LINE
MONTICELLO PRINTING
BLD INSP 35.15 PRINTED FORMS & PAPER 101.42401.2030 058 00023
FINANCE 48.99 PRINTED FORMS & PAPER 101.41520.2030 058 00024
PUBLIC WORKS 21. 30 PRINTED FORMS & PAPER ~O1.43110.2030 058 00025
FIRE DEPT 54.95 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES 101.42201.2099 058 00026
160.39 *VENDOR TOTAL
MOON MOTOR SALES. INC.
STREETS 97.71 EOUIPMENT REPAIR PARTS 101.43120.2210 058 00027
NATIONAL BUSHING PARTS &
CSAH 75 3.57 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 467.49201.2199 058 00052
SHOP 6.07 VEHICLE REPAIR PARTS 101.43127.2211 058 00053
DARKS 55.88 VEHICLE REPAIR PARTS 225.45201.2211 058 00054
65.52 *YENDOR TOTAL
NETSOURCE
coPY PAPER/C HALL 297. 59 PRINTED FORMS & PAPER 101.41301.2030 012051-00 058 00136
OHNSTAD/ELMER
MILEAGE REIMB 77. 00 TRAVEL EXPENSE 502.49480.3310 058 00070
O~LL CONCEPTS, INC.
LOCATES 180.00 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 601.49440.3199 9080507 058 00057
PEARSON BROS. INC.
SEALCOATING 30,723.84 IMPROYEMENTS 101.43120.5301 058 00034
SEALCOATlNG 18,323.72 PATHWAY MAINTENANCE 225.45202.4091 058 00035
SEALCOA TING 837.76 IMPROVEMENTS 211.45501.5301 058 00036
49,885.32 *VENDOR TOTAL
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
CREDIT DUE 9.82CR LIOUOR 609.49750.2510 3200270 058 00124
Ll OUOR 537.50 Ll OUOR 609.49750.2510 530628 058 00103
FREIGHT 5.10 FREIGHT 609.49750.3330 530628 058 00104
532.78 *YENDOR TOTAL
PHOTO I
WWTP EXP 51.19 PROF SRV - CONSTRUCTION 436.49201.3025 058 00037
CSAH 75 19.59 PROF SRY - CONSTRUCTION 467.49201.3025 058 00038
CITY HALL SUPPLIES 34.46 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 101.41940.2199 058 00039
HSWY 25 9.97 PROF SRV - CONSTRUCTION 450.49201.3025 058 00040
115.21 *YENDOR TOTAL
PIPELINE SUPPLY, INC.
ClA:\I<S 207.87 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 225.45201.2199 51374021.001 058 00041
R~LE CORPORATION/THE
CITY HALL SUPPLIES 62.17 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES 101.41940.2099 ODY39400 058 00042
-- -------"'--.-~----. ----.. -..----.-- --.--- ---- -- _.__ _______n ______
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF MONTICELLC
09/15/1999 14:50:08 Scneaule of 8ills GL540R-V06.00 PAGE 5
V. NAME
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE POll F/P ID LINE
RELIABLE CORPORATION/THE
C HALL OFF SUP 52.17 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES 101.41940.2099 OFP28000 058 00121
114.34 :fVENDOR TOTAL
RELIANT ENERGY
ANIMAL CONTROL 9.59 GAS 101.42701.3830 058 00043
UTILI TI ES 15.98 GAS 101.41940.3830 058 00125
UTILITIES 9.59 GAS 101.41990.3830 058 00126
UT I LITIES 9.59 GAS 225.45201.3830 058 00127
UTILITIES 9.59 GAS 601.49440.3830 058 00128
UTILITIES 20.39 GAS 101.42201.3830 058 00129
UTI LI TI ES 96.54 GAS 101.43127.3830 058 00130
UTILITIES 15.98 GAS 211.45501.3830 058 00131
J TI LI TIES 12.13 GAS 602.49480.3830 058 00132
199.38 :fVENDOR TOTAL
RICHARD KNUTSON, INC.
PYMT 114 7THST CONST 51,471.48 PROF SRV - CONSTRUCTION 462.49201.3025 058 00138
RON'S GOURMET ICE
ICE 229.66 MISC TAXABLE 609.49750.2540 48480 058 00098
R~DGE JOHNSON EQUIPM
STREETS 710.46 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 225.45201.2199 C15099 058 00044
SAAR ION/CARL
PICNIC TABLES/BENCHES/PK 703.39 IMPROVEMENTS 225.45201.5301 058 00079
SAFETY-KLEEN CORP.
~TC EOUIPMENT/STRTS 82.96 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS 101.43127.3190 198298 058 00139
SCHARBER & SONS, INC.
;)ARK REPAIRS 239.69 EQUIPMENT REPAIR PARTS 225.45201.2210 01212600 058 00071
PARKS 12.92 EQUIPMENT REPAIR PARTS 225.45201.2210 212430 058 00045
252.61 :fVENDOR TOTAL
;CHLUENDER CONSTRUCTION
~ILL/COMM CTR 165.00 PROF SRV - CONSTRUCTION 461.49201.3025 4174 058 00133
;ERVICEMASTER BY HICKMAN
CARPET CLEANING/F DEPT 178.92 PROF SRV - CUSTODIAL 101.42201.3110 6980 058 00137
;MOLNIK ELECTRIC
COMMUN ITY CTR 1,188.14 PROF SRV - CONSTRUCTION 461. 4920 1.3025 058 00046
PECIALTY SEEDS, INC
.S 614.00 IMPROVEMENTS 225.45201. 5301 2169 058 00123
OS TELECOM
TELEPHONE CHGS 127 .51 TELEPHONE 225.45201. 321 0 058 00058
TELEPHONE CHGS 1,756.51 TELEPHONE 101.41301.321G 058 00059
-.. -.-- -..- -.-. -----~---,. -----
3RC FINANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF MONTICELLO
09/15/1999 14;50:08 Schedule of Bills GL540R-V06.00 PAGE 6
V. NAME
JESCRIPTION AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME "UNO & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE PO# FIP ID LINE
TDS TElECOM
-ELEPHONE CHGS 66.58 TELEPHONE '01.42201.3210 058 00060
TELEPHONE CHGS 49.01 TELEPHONE 101.42701.3210 058 00061
TELEC'HONE CHGS 31.06 TELEPHONE 501.49440.3210 058 00062
TELEPHONE CHGS 529.07 TELEPHONE 101.43110.3210 058 00063
TELEPHONE CHGS 156.95 TELEPHONE 101.41990.3210 058 00064
TELEPHONE CHGS 10.20 TELEPHONE 101.13115.3210 058 00065
TELEPHONE CHGS 130.32 TELEPHONE 509.49754.3210 058 00066
TELEPHONE CHGS 207.73 TELEPHONE 602.49480.3210 058 00067
3.064.94 *VENDOR TOTAL
THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMP
CREDIT DUE 12.50CR BEER 609.49750.2520 171437 058 00093
BEER 6,822.55 BEER 609.49750.2520 172030 058 00094
\1ISC TAX 201.10 MISC TAXABLE 609.49750.2540 172030 058 00095
7.011.15 *VENDOR TOTAL
TOP NOTCH CONSTRUCTION C
WINDOW CLEANINGIC HALL 375.00 PROF SRV - CUSTODIAL 101.41940.3110 058 00078
TRI-STATE PUMP & CONTROL
.~R LIFT STATION REP 2.560.23 REPAIR & MTC - MACH & EO 602.49490.4044 17767 058 00047
US FILTER DISTRIBUTION G
WATER 458.58 METERS & VALVES FOR RESA 601.49440.2271 5643491 058 00048
WATER 347.34 METERS & VALVES FOR RESA 601.49440.2271 5655729 058 00122
805.92 *VENDOR TOTAL
VIKING COCA COLA
POD 159.45 MISC TAXABLE 609.49750.2540 2225678 058 00097
VOSS LIGHTING
_IGi-F BULBS 194.67 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 609.49754.2199 2047941-00 058 00049
WATER LABORATORIES. INC
W.~'-:ER 20.00 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 601.49440.3199 058 00050
~RIGHT-HENNEPIN COOP ELE
UT I L IT! ES 13.10 BIOSOLIDS FARM IMPROVEME 602.49480.4385 058 00051
.
--------------------.--.---
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTE~
09/15/1999 14:50:10
.
Scnedule of Bills
FUND RECAP:
FUND DESCRIPTION
DISBURSEMENTS
101 GENERAL FUND
211 Ll BRARY FUND
213 HRA FUND
224 SHADE TREE FUND
225 PARK FUND
240 CAPITAL PROJECT REVOLVING FD
435 93-14C WWTP EXPANSION PRJ
450 96-04C HWY25/MNDOT IMPR
451 98-03C COMMUNITY CENTER
462 98-12C 7TH STREET EXTENSION
457 98-17C CSAH 75/E BROW IMPR
601 WATER FUND
502 SEWER FUND
609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND
510 TRANSPORTATION FUND
651 RIVERSIDE CEMETERY
36,762,25
981.54
~ ,518.10
326.38
23,640,06
24.92
51. 19
9.9'1
1,353.14
51,471.48
23.16
4.279.42
2,918.46
31,395.96
5,624.30
1,118.25
'OTAL ALL FUNDS
161,498.58
.
BANK RECAP:
SANK NAME
DISBURSEMENTS
GENL GENERAL CHECKING
LIOR LIQUOR CHECKING
130,102.62
31.395.96
TOTAL ALL BANKS
161.498.58
THE PRECEDING LIST OF BILLS PAYABLE WAS REVIEWED AND APPROVED FOR PAYMENT.
DATE ............
APPROVED BY
.
CITY OF MONTICELLO
GL060S-V05.00 RECAPPAGE
GL540R
3RC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
09/22/1999 14:18:14
.
Schedule of Bills
CITY OF MONTICELLO
GL050S-V06.00 COVERPAG:
GL540R
Report Selection:
RUN GROUP... 00923 COMMENT... 9/23 CHECKS
DATA-JE~ID
DATA COMMENT
D~09221999-095 9/23/99 CKS
Run Instructions:
loba Banner Copies Form Printer Hold Space LPI Lines CPI
01 N S 6 066 10
.
.
3RC FINANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF MONTICELLO
09/22/1999 14: 18: 15 Schedule of B111s GL540R-V06.00 PAGE 1
.OOR NAME
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME ~UNO & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE POll F/P 10 LINE
A T & T WIRELESS SERVICE
PHONE CHS 42.14 TELEPHONE :01.41301.3210 095 00003
PHONE CHS 40.99 TELEPHONE 101.41910.3210 095 00004
PHON t CHS 58.01 TELEPHONE 250.46501.3210 095 00005
PHONE CHS 42.65 TELEPHONE 101.4270'1.3210 095 00006
183.79 'VENDOR TOTAL
ACS
SRVICE AGRMT 2.157.00 PROF SRV - DATA PROCESSI 101.41920.3090 1223698RI 095 00001
ARAMARK
SUPoL! Es/e HALL 89.90 MISe OPERATING SUPPLIES 101.41940.2199 6013-913480 095 00002
AUTOMATION SUPPLY COM PAN
PAPER 41.84 PRINTED FORMS & PAPER 101.41920.2030 909085 095 00008
PAPER 225.87 PRINTED FORMS & PAPER 101.41920.2030 90917 2 095 00007
267.71 *VENDOR TOTAL
8 & H HEATING & COOLING
FURNACE/LIBRARY/DOWN PYT 7,000.00 IMPROVEMENTS 211.45501.5301 095 00011
~O MUNICIPAL PRODUCTS
PPLl ES/SHOP 455.48 VEHICLE REPAIR PARTS 101.43127.2211 114142 095 00082
BARR ENGINEERING COMPANY
ENG FEES/COMM eTR 365.50 PROF SRV - ENGINEERING' 461.49201.3030 2386046-B 095 00010
ENG FEES/COMM CTR 3.182.40 PROF SRV - ENGINEERING F 461.49201.3030 2386046-9 095 00009
3,547.90 *VENDOR TOTAL
BERNICK'S PEPSI COLA COM
BEER 92.80 BEER 609.49750.2520 60579 095 00057
MISC 53.25 MISC TAXABLE 609.49750.2540 60580 095 00058
146.05 *VENDOR TOTAL
CELLULAR 2000 OF 5T CLOU
PHONE CHGS 26.87 TELEPHONE 502.49490.3210 095 00012
PHONE CHGS 4.77 TELEPHONE 101.42201.3210 095 00013
PHONE CHG5 112.61 TELEPHONE 101.42401.3210 095 00014
PHONE CHGS 17. 76 TELEPHONE 101.43115.3210 095 00015
PHONE CHGS 58.57 TELEPHONE 601.49440.3210 095 00016
PHONE CHGS 66.33 TELEPHONE 101.43110.3210 095 00017
286.91 *VENDOR TOTAL
COMMERCIAL ASPHALT COMPA
STREETS 21.30 MIse OPERATING SUPPLIES 101.43120.2199 095 00018
~RESS AIR & EOUIPMENT
E ON INVOICE 992637 300.00 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS 101.42201.3190 992637 095 00019
-... ._~- .- - .--
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF MONTICELLO
J9/22/1999 14: 18: 15 Scnedule of Bills GL540R-V06.00 PAGE 2
_NDOR NAME
OESCRIPTION AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE PO# F/P ID LINE
DAHLHEIMER DISTRIBUTING
BEER 2.054.99 BEER 609.49750.2520 52994 095 00062
BEER 125.00 BEER 609.49750.2520 53205 095 00063
CREDIT DUE 25.00CR MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 609.49754.2199 53381 095 00061
2.154.99 "'VENDOR TOTAL
DAY DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
BEER 55.95 BEER 509.49750.2520 71467 095 00059
BEER 1.011.75 BEER 609.49750.2520 71680 095 00060
1.067.70 "'VENDOR TOTAL
DESIGN FOR PRINT STUDIO
NEWSLETTER PRINTING 2.241.82 NEWSLETTER 10i.41301.3195 095 00020
DONLAR CONSTRUCTION COMP
COMM CTR PYMT 605,495.80 PROF SRV - ENGINEERING F 461.49201.3030 095 00021
FLESCH'S PAPER SERVICES.
BAGS 79.28 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 609.49754.2199 1331450 095 00064
GLOBAL EUIPMENT COMPANY
~lARD HATS/COMM CTR 54.08 CLOTHING SUPPLIES 226.45122.2111 79206994 095 00023
GLUNz/RA YMOND J
DON NAGEL 325.00 PROF SRV - EXCAVATION 651.49010.3115 095 00024
GME CONSULTANTS. INC.
COMM CTR ENG FEES 3.927.50 PROF SRV - ENGINEERING F 461.49201.3030 3228 095 00022
GROSSLEIN BEVERAGE INC.
BEER 3.944.37 BEER 609.49750.2520 174533 095 00065
HAKANSON ANDERSON ASSOC.
WALKING PATH FEES 3.881.25 IMPROVEMENTS 225.45201.5301 626 095 00025
HDR ENGINEERING. INC.
WrFP ENG FEES 7.945.27 PROF SRV - ENGINEERING F 436.49201.3030 164-15577 095 00026
WWTP ENG FEES 7.272.58 PROF SRV - ENGINEERING F 436.49201.3030 164-15804 095 00027
15.217.85 "'VENDOR TOTAL
HOME JUICE
.jUICE 35.10 MISC TAXABLE 609.49750.2540 44181 095 00066
HUBERT COMPANY
SHOPPING CARTS 644.10 FURNITURE & FIXTURES 609.49754.5601 095 00067
~HNSON BRaS WHOLESALE L
~~IOUOR CREDIT 19.20CR LIOUOR 509.49750.2510 100473 095 00068
WINE 1,041. 77 WINE 609.49750.2530 1022733 095 00069
FREIGHT CHGS 11.33 FREIGHT 609.49750.3330 1022733 095 00070
1,033.90 "'VENDOR TOTA_
-- -._--_. ----- -~-._-- -. - ---.. -- ---. -- --- -
8RC FINANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF MONTICELLO
09/22/1999 14; 18; 15 Schedule of 811)s GL540R-V06.00 PAGE ,
~
.DOR NAME
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME fUND & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE PO# FIP 10 LINE
K MART STORE
PW OFFICE SUPPLIES 164.68 MISC OTHER EXPENSE '01.43110 4399 095 00087
MAINSTREET DESIGNS. INC
MARKETING PROG/ECON DEVL 3.778.41 BROCHURES (MARKETING PRO 101.46501.3560 4117 095 00039
MAJIRS! ADVERTISING & DE
MARKETING PRGM!COM CTR 1.356.50 BROCHURES 226.45122.3560 095 00040
MCDOWALL COMPANY
CORECT CODING. CK 44159 1.511.04 REPAIR & MTC - MACH & EO 101.41940.4044 095 00031
CORECT CODING. CK 44159 1.511.04CR REPAIR & MTC - MACH & EO 101 .41301 .404~ 095 00032
CORRECT CODING. CK 44202 512.87CR REPAIR & MTC - MACH & EO 101.41301.4044 095 00033
CORRECT CODING. CK 44202 512.87 REPAIR & MTC - MACH & EO 101.41940.4044 095 00034
CORRECT CODING. CK 44417 262.08 REPAIR & MTC - MACH & EO 101.41940.4044 095 00035
CORRECT CODING. CK 44417 262.08CR REPAIR & MTC - MACH & EO 101.41301.4044 095 00036
CORRECT CODING. CK 44920 48.50CR REPAIR & MTC - MACH & EO 101.41301.4044 095 00037
CORRECT CODING. CK 44920 48.50 REPAIR & MTC - MACH & EO 101.41940.4044 095 00038
CITY HALL REPAIRS 1.548.67 REPAIR & MTC - MACH & EO 101.41940.4044 005622 095 00030
LI OUOR REPA I RS 314.31 REPAIR & MTC - MACH & EO 609.49754.4044 005652 095 00029
LIOUOR REPAIRS 171. 00 REPAIR & MTC - MACH & EO 609.49754.4044 005653 095 00028
. 2.033.98 *VENDOR TOTAL
MN STATE TREASURER
CERTIFICATION RENEWAL 20.00 DUES. MEMBERSHIP & SUBSC 101.42401.4330 095 00044
MONTICELLO CHAMBER OF CO
TRAVEL EXPENSE 10.00 TRAVEL EXPENSE ~01.46501.3310 095 00041
MONTICELLO COMMUNITY PAR
Mep CONTRIBUTION 35.000.00 IMPROVEMENTS 240.49201.5301 095 00042
O'NEILL/JEFF
TRAVEL EXPENSE REIMB 195.36 TRAVEL EXPENSE 101.41301.3310 095 00043
OLSON & SONS ELECTRIC.
COMM CTR COSTS 1,989.54 PROF SRV - CONSTRUCTION 461.49201.3025 18030 095 00086
PARK REPAIRS 67.37 REPAIR & MTC - OTHER 225.45201.4095 18068 095 00085
COMM CTR COSTS 55.00 PROF SRV - CONSTRUCTION 461.49201.3025 18078 095 00084
RIVER VIEW SOUARE REP 1.600.00 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 101.43160.3199 18095 095 00083
3.711.91 *VENDOR TOTAL
PATCH/FRED
CLOTHING REIMB/F PATCH 210.00 MOTOR FUELS '01.42401.2120 095 00045
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
.REDIT 28.61CR LIOUOR 609.49750.25iO 3201432 095 00071
IOUOR 1,287.90 LIOUOR 609.49750.2510 533180 095 00072
LIOUOR 10.20 FREIGHT 509.49750.3330 533180 095 00073
1.269.49 lVENDOR TOTAL
-.- -- .--- ---"-.-
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTE~ CITY OF MONTICELLO
09/22/1999 14: 18: 15 Schedule of Bills GL540R-V06.00 PAGE 4
_OOR NAME
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME "UNO & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE POll FIP 10 LINE
PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING
'1ISC 334.50 MISe TAXABLE 609.49750.2540 594490 095 00074
FREIGHT 5.84 FREIGHT 609.49750.3330 594490 095 00075
340.34 "'VENDOR TOTAL
PIPELINE SUPPLY. INe.
SUpoL! ES 59.37 MIse OPERATING SUPPLIES 467.49201. 2199 S1380594.001 095 00046
PITNEY BOWES
POSTAGE MACHINE RENTAL 504.00 EOUIPMENT RENTAL 101.41940.4150 0467084-SP99 095 00048
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GR
WW-P PYMT 37.095.42 PROF SRV - PSG. INe 502.49480.3080 59733 095 00047
RELIABLE CORPORATION/THE
C HALL SUPPLI ES 213.58 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES '01.41940.2099 08693600 095 00049
C HALL SUPPLIES 29.02 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES 101.41940.2099 OG693601 095 00050
242.60 'VENDOR TOTAL
TAYLOR LAND SURVEYORS IN
SURVEY FEES/KJELLBERG 360.00 MIse PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 450.49201.3199 99381 095 00051
~PE DISTRIBUTING COMP 509.49750.2520 095 00076
BE~R 2.384.60 BEER
BEER 3.892.80 BEER 609.49750.2520 172578 095 00078
8EER 750.00 BEER 509.49750 2520 172619 095 00077
7.027.40 "'VENDOR TOTAL
U SLINK
wEB SITE/MAIL FEES 230.00 PROF SVC - WEBSITE/EMAIL 101.41920.3092 095 00055
WEB SITE/MAIL FEES 10.00 PROF SVC - WEBSITE/EMAIL 101.42201.3092 095 00056
240.00 "'VENDOR TOTAL
US FILTER DISTRIBUTION G
tiA'ER METER 170.50 METERS & VALVES FOR RESA 601.49440.2271 5668765 095 00054
VIKING COCA COLA
POD 261.30 MISC TAXABLE 609.49750.2540 2226579 095 00079
W S DARLEY & COMPANY
HOSES/RIVER MILL PARK 1M 618.11 IMPROVEMENTS 225.45201.5301 278472 095 00088
WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC
GARBAGE PICKUP PAYMENT 4,633.24 PROF SRV - REFUSE COLLEC 101.43230.3100 21451 095 00053
WATER LABORATORIES, INC
.ATER TESTING 20.00 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIe 601.49440.3199 991-230 095 00052
WATSON COMPANY, INC/THE
~ISC 130.65 MISC TAXABLE 609.49750.2540 551197 095 00080
BAGS 179.65 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 609.49754.2199 551197 095 00081
-- -----~-,--- ------~-- - .-.-
8RC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
09/22/1999 14:18:15
.NOOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
WATSON COMPANY, INC/THE
Schedule of Bills
ACCOUNT NAME
;'UNO & ACCOUNT
310,30 *VENDOR TOTAL
.
.
""-,- --" -._-- --- --
CITY OF MONTICELLO
GL540R-V06,OO PAGE 5
CLAIM INVOICE PO# FIP 10 LINE
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
09/22/1999 14:18:17
.
Schedule of Bills
CITY OF MONTICELLO
GL060S-V06.00 RECAPPAGE
GL540R
FUND RECAP:
=UND DESCRIPTION
DISBURSEMENTS
'01 GENERAL FUND
21' LIBRARY FUND
225 PARK FUND
226 COMMUNITY CENTER
240 CAPITAL PROJECT REVOLVING FD
250 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTH FD
436 93-14C WWTP EXPANSION PRJ
450 96-04C HWY25/MNDOT IMPR
461 98-03C COMMUNITY CENTER
467 98-17C CSAH 75/E BROW IMPR
501 WATER FUND
602 SEWER FUND
609 MUNICIPAL LIOUOR FUND
651 RIVERSIDE CEMETERY
:9.007.42
7.000.0C
01,566.73
1.410.58
35,000.00
58.01
15.217.85
360.00
515.015.74
59.31
249.07
37.122.29
~8,799.63
325.00
'OTAL ALL FUNDS
/54,191.69
'K RECAP;
BANK NAME
DISBURSEMENTS
GENL GENERAL CHECKING
LIOR LIOUOR CHECKING
735.392 06
18.799.63
TOTAL ALL BANKS
754.191.69
THE PRECEDING LIST OF BILLS PAYABLE WAS REVIEWED AND APPROVED FOR PAYMENT.
DATE ..... . . .. .. .
APPROVED 8Y
.................... +........,...
.
.
.
.
INFORMATION ITEM
September 27, 1999
House Burn -Fire Department: (R W)
Mr. Jerry Burns of Little Mountain Feeds, has applied for a demolition permit to remove a vacffilt
residential structure west of Little Mountain Feeds on Maple Street by means of having the Fire
Department burn the structure.
It is my understanding that the Fire Chief has applied for the proper permits to conduct this
burning, but it does raise a question in my mind as to whether or not the City should establish a
policy regarding the burning of structures for private property owners. According to our burning
ordinance, open burning can be conducted by the Fire Department for bona fide instruction and
training purposes. Our ordinance does not regulate how many burnings the Fire Department
could conduct for private property owners and also no mention is made of whether or not a
property owner should be responsible for all the charges incurred by the City in allowing the Fire
Department to conduct the burning.
I assume that the neighboring property owners will be notified of this controlled burn, but
possibly establishing the procedures in a policy format would be beneficial for the Fire Chief and
Fire Department personnel. In regards to seeking reimbursement for the cost the City incurs in
covering wages and wear and tear on equipment, the City general fund has not been reimbursed
in the past although the Fire Department may have collected these directly. If the Council
desires, J could work with Fire Chief Scott Douglas to prepare a policy that the Council could
adopt that would set out procedures for future burns conducted by the Fire Department on a
volunteer basis.
If the City Council does not have a problem with the burning of this house for Little Mountain
Feeds, the burn will occur sometime in early October.
.
INFORMATION ITEM
September 27,1999
Mcr Matchinl! Contribution (RW)
The MCP has recently provided the City with a copy of their year end (1998) llnancial statements
which indicates they have again met the goal of receiving $35,000 in contributions. As a result,
they have requested the City of Monticello's matching grmlt for $35,000 for the year 1999.
A summary of their financial statements including a list of 1998 contributors is attached.
. Attachment: Financial Information
.
.
.
.
August 16, 1999
Rick Wolfsteller
City Administrator
City of Monticello
PO Box 1147
Monticello, MN 55362
Dear Mr. Wolfsteller:
Monticello Community Partners had another successful year of fundraising in 1998,
raising a total of $35,445 in cash donations from individuals and businesses. In addition,
we received in~kind contributions valued at over $6,540. This level of support shows the
commitment of the entire Monticello community to the goals and objectives of the
Downtown and Riverfront Revitalization Plan. We are especially grateful to the City
Council for its financial commitment in the form of a matching grant up to $35,000. This
grant is crucial to MCP's ability to continue its work on revitalization. I would like to
request payment of the grant at this time. A copy of MCP's Financial Statement as of
December 31, 1999 is enclosed as well as a list of contributors and in-kind contributors.
In addition to financial support, MCP appreciates the outstanding level of cooperation it
enjoys with the City Council, staff, and Commissions. We can be very proud of the work
that has been accomplished in the last three years as a result of collaboration on the
part of Monticello's public, private and nonprofit sectors and the hard work of everyone
involved. Monticello is building an excellent foundation for its future and an enviable
record of achievement that has other cities beginning to take notice. MCP looks forward
to a continued and active partnership with the city.
Please feel free to call me if you have any questions or need any additional information
regarding the matching grant.
Thank you for your support of MCP.
Sincerely, 2J ~J'
/?a ~
Susie Wojchouski
Chair.
Ene.
cc: Bruce Thielen, MCP City Council Representative
Barbara Esse, MCP Secretary
Monticello Community Partners 107 West Broadway, PO Box 984
phone: 612.295.0999 fax: 612.295.0997 mcp@montiwaves.org
Monticello, MN 55362
www.montiwaves.org
.
.
.
1998 In-Kind Contributors
#1 Sun and Styling Studio
Steve and Mary Andrews
Authority Fence and Deck
BBF Properties, Inc
Bernick's Pepsi ofSt. Cloud
Pam Campbell
Cedrus Creek Craftsmen
Rosamund Doty
Barb and Bob Esse
Fleming Law Office
Cheryl Fuller
Jan Goeman
Joanna Hagerstrom
Jam'n Jo Espresso Stop
Steve Johnson
Karen's Kustom Draperies
Marianna Khauv
KRWC Radio Expo
Larson's Ace Hardware
Little Mountain Flowers
Maj its Advertising
Marquette Bank
Claudia and Karl Menzel
Monticello Chamber of Commerce
Monticello Printing
Monticello Times and Shopper
Mosford, Barthel, and Co
Oertel Architects
Royal Printing
Smith and Associates
Snyder Drug
Super America
Gretchen Ulrich
Rita Ulrich
Alan and Susie Wojchouski
1998 Contributors
.
Action Plus Temporary Services
Anderson Enterprises
Barb Esse
BBF Properties
Bill & Rosanna Fair
Biske Enterprises
Cargill / Sunny Fresh Foods
Chin Yuen Silver Fox Inn
Chris Lommel Photography
Custom Canopy
Dan Wickman
Dave & Julie Wik
Dave Peterson's Ford
Don's Cleaners
Esse Technologies
First National Bank
Flicker's TV and Appliance
Fran Fair
Fulfillment Systems, Inc
G. LaBua
Gruys Borden
Hillside Partnership
Hoglund Bus Company
H- Window Company
James and Gruber
Karen and Ken Kinsley
Larson's Ace Hardware
Little Mountain Feed
Little Mountain Flowers
Loch Jewelers
Maggie Gannen
Marquette Bank
Maus Foods
Minnegasco
Monticello-Big Lake Hospital
Monticello Liquor
Monticello Times and Shopper
Muller Family Theater
NSP
Olson State Farm Insurance
Peterson-Grimsmo Chapel
Red's Mobil
Rita Ulrich
Riverfest Committee
Riverwood Inn and Conference Center
Roger and Sonia Carlson
Ron Hoglund Agency
Rosamund Sandusky
Snyder Drug Express
Suburban Manufacturing
IDS Telecom
Ultra Lube, Inc
Wright Hennepin
Wright Way Shopper
.
.
305 CEDAR STREET - SUITE 201
MONTICEllO, MINNESOTA 55362
(612) 295-4800' FAX (612) 295-4804
fI'"
Mosford, Barthel & Co., PLC.
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
OFFICES IN:
COKATO 286-5325
ELK RIVER 441-1384
.
To the Board of Directors
Monticello Community Partners
Monticello, Minnesota
We have compiled the accompanying statement of assets, liabilities, and fund equity - cash
basis of Monticello Community Partners (a non-profit corporation) as of December 31, 1998, the
related statement of revenue, expenses, and fund equity - cash basis for the period then ended, and
the supplementary information included in the accompanying schedules, which is presented only for
supplementary analysis purposes, in accordance with Statements on Standards for Accounting and
Review Services issued by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. The financial
statements have been prepared on the cash basis of accounting, which is a comprehensive basis of
accounting other than generally accepted accounting principles.
A compilation is limited to presenting in the form of financial statements information that is the
representation of the organization. We have not audited or reviewed the accompanying financial
statements and, accordingly, do not express an opinion or any other form of assurance on them.
However, we did become aware of the departures from generally accepted accounting principles
described in the following paragraphs.
. The Organization has not adopted the methods of accounting for contributions and investments
and method of financial reporting and financial statement presentation for nonprofit organizations
required by generally accepted accounting principles. The effect of these departures has not been
determined.
The Organization has elected to omit substantially all of the disclosures ordinarily included in
financial statements prepared on the cash basis of accounting. If the omitted disclosures were
included in the financial statements, they might influence the user's conclusions about the
Organization's assets, liabilities, fund balances, revenue, and expenses. Accordingly, these financial
statements are not designed for those who are not informed about such matters.
~, ~aMIed & (Jp" p~e,
MOSFORD, BARTHEL & CO., PLC.
Certified Public Accountants
August 2, 1999
.
-1-
-'.
The CPA. Never Underestimate The Value.'"
-_._.._-~,_.",--,-,,_._...~'~_. ,. ~--- .,--_.. .~--_. ..--.--.-.-'--
.
.
.
MONTICELLO COMMUNITY PARTNERS
STATEMENT OF ASSETS, LIABILITIES, AND FUND EQUITY - CASH BASIS
DECEMBER 31, 1998
ASSETS
$ 60,452
$ 4,583
1.413
3,170
2.874
11: 66.496
Current Assets
Cash
Furniture and equipment
Furniture and equipment
Less accumulated depreciation
Net Furniture and Equipment
Other Assets
Organizations costs
TOTAL ASSETS
LIABILITIES AND FUND EQUITY
Liabilities
Accrued payroll taxes withheld
Total Liabilities
$
Fund Equity
Fund Balance
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND FUND EQUITY
See Accountants' Compilation Report.
-2-
875
$
875
65.621
$
66.496
MONTICELLO COMMUNITY PARTNERS
STATEMENT OF REVENUE, EXPENSES AND FUND EQUITY - CASH BASIS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998
. REVENUE AND EXPENSES
Revenue
Donations:
Corporations $ 34,424
Individuals 1,021
Matching grants - City of Monticello 35,000
Fundraising:
Garage sale 796
Take-A-Break 420
Fall festival 216
Wa1k and Roll (63)
Insurance refund 1,053
Interest 337
Total Revenue $ 73,204
Expenses
Administrative $ 51,752
Promotions 3,506
Design projects 1,735
Economic projects 1.161
Total Expenses 58 .154
EXCESS REVENUE OVER EXPENSES $ 15.050
.
FUND EOUlTY
BALANCE, BEGINNING $ 50,571
Excess revenue over expenses 15.050
BALANCE, ENDING $ 65.621
.
See Accountants' Compilation Report.
-3-
MONTICELLO COMMUNITY PARTNERS
SCHEDULE OF FUNDRAISING ACTMTIES
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,1998
.
Gross Receipts
Expenses
Garage sale
$
1,122
$
326
Take-A-Break
621
201
Fall festival
1,140
924
Walk and Roll
278
341
.
.
See Accountants' Compilation Report.
-4-
Net Income (loss)
$
796
420
216
(63)
MONTICELLO COMMUNITY PARTNERS
SCHEDULE OF OPERATING EXPENSES
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,1998
. General and Administrative Expenses
Wages $ 30,154
Rent 2,716
Payroll taxes 2,568
Telephone 1,903
Employee benefits 1,806
Office expense 1,698
Annual meeting 1,382
Professional fees 1,214
Newsletter 1,179
Copies and lease 1,135
Depreciation 1,033
Insurance 939
Revitalization plan project 881
Dues and subscriptions 572
Utilities 503
Liquor referendum 474
Supplies 347
Seminars and training 329
HRA lot improvement 249
Advertising 170
Permanent display 148
Fundraising contributions 126
Repairs and Maintenance 122
Bank charges 82
Interest 22
. Total General and Administrative Expenses $ 51,752
Promotional Expenses
Take-A-Break $ 1,883
Walk and Roll 791
Holiday events 442
Buttons 374
Meetings 16
Total Promotional Expenses 3,506
Design Expenses
History project $ 945
Design advisory team 443
Building rehabilitation 249
Reforestation project 71
Design recognition 27
Total Design Expenses 1,735
Economic Expenses
Identity study $ 636
Web page 208
Publications 91
Riverfront development 87
Shop Monticello project 80
Meetings 59
. Total Economic Expenses 1.161
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES :1; 58.154
See Accountants' Compilation Report.
-5-