City Council Agenda Packet 08-23-1999
.
.
.
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO CITY COtJNCIL
Monday, August 23,1999 - 7 p.m.
Mayor: Roger Belsaas
Council Members: Clint Herbst, Brian Stumpf, Roger Carlson, Bruce Thielen
1. Call to order.
2.
Approval of minutes of the regular meeting held August 9, 1999.
A.
3. Consideration of adding items to the agenda.,
A. )i1J) ''I ~.> (h I tli, t' ') 11,~l'J (vi" dJ .# II ')
B.
C.
4.
Citizens comments/petitions, requests, and complaints.
,~ ,
Consent agenda. 1\f."7r. 'i'.
1, \) ,.
\
A. Consideration of a adopting a resolution approving Monticello Heartland
Express 2000 Budget and Transit Assistance application.
5.
B. Consideration of accepting Environmental Assessment Worksheet for the
Groveland preliminary plat and authorize publication and advertisement for
public comment.
C. Consideration of Resolution Declaring intent to Reimburse Project Costs
through Bond Sale Proceeds.
E. Consideration of approval of on-sale liquor license transfer - lP's.
F. Consideration of Change Order #22 on WWTP Project 93-14C.
G. Consideration to adopt a resolution calling for a public hearing for establishment
of Business Subsidy Criteria.
H. Consideration of East County Road 75 Project Street Lighting
I.
Consideration of adopting a resolution to modify Central Monticello
Redevelopment Plan and establish TIF plan TIF District 1-26,.
6. Consideration of items removed from the consent agenda for discussion.
.
.
.
Agenda
Monticello City Council
August 23, 199
Page Two
1"/
, ).1.1,
7.
Consideration of selecting a developer for further negotiations on the sale
and development of City property at 5th Street and Walnut Street (Former ~O
I ('t' VIe.- II
Ferrell Gas site) C \.-lr ,:;;j..f .
'V
I,' ,..-""'(
~' '..'
,-r.{ I
/( : I
8. Consideration of granting concept stage planned unit development approval
for five 12-unit apartment buildings. Applicant: Monticello Village Apartments.
Location: Northwest corner of intersection of Minnesota Street & 7th Street.
9. Consideration of zoning ordinance amendments establishing tattoo and body
piercing parlor as a permitted use in a B-4 zone and consideration of adopting
a city ordinance establishing a licensing requirement for operation of same.
10. Consideration of an offer to purchase a City owned parcel adjacent to newly created
Chelsea Road East between Highway 25/Cedar Street - Dan Mielke
11 . Consideration of authorizing underground portion of electrical work for South
Highway 25 Project.
12.
Consideration to review public comments from the North Anchor informational
meeting and Council direction thereafter.
13. Consideration of bills for the month of August.
14. Adjournment
.
.
.
MINUTES
MEETING - MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL
Monday, August 9,1999
Membcrs Present:
Roger Bclsaas, Roger Carlson, Clint llerbst, Brian Stumpf and
Bruce Thielen.
Members Absent:
None
Mayor Belsaas called the meeting to order at 7 p.m. and declared a quorum present.
2. Approval of minutes ofthe rel!ular meeting held on Julv 26, 1999.
BRIAN STUMPF MOVED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF
JULY 26,1999 AS PRESENTED. ROGER CARLSON SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION
CARRIED WITH ROGER BELSAAS ABSTAINING.
3.
Consideration of adding items to the al!enda.
Rick Wolfsteller, City Administrator, added to the consent agenda a Resolution to Reimburse
Certain Expenditures from the Proceeds of Bonds to be issued by the City. The City Administrator
also added for discussion the scheduling of meeting datcs to work on the 2000 budget and
discussion of future plans for the liquor store building. The bid on the Walnut Street Project was
also placed on the consent agenda with the intent to reject all the bids received because they
exceeded the City Engineer's estimate and add the work to thc Chelsea Road Project bids. Bruce
Thielen requested that a report on the Library Board meeting of August 9th be added to the agenda.
Ollic Koropchak asked that Item #11 be removed from the agenda as the property owner is
uncertain whether he wants to give up the 7 foot strip of land.
4.
Citizens comments/petitions, requests and complaints.
Mike Gair from McCombs, Frank, Roos & Associates and Shawn Weinand came before the
Council regarding a change in the preliminary plat of Groveland that was discussed at the MOAA
meeting of August 4th. On the proposed preliminary plat at the entrance from Chelsea Road into
the development there was area on both sides of the access road designated for multi-family.
The developer has since acquired additional property adjacent to the proposed plat. It was discussed
at the MOAA meeting about possibly changing the land use from medium density to commercial.
The developer was asking input from the Council on the suitability of converting the medium
density area to commercial. This item had been discussed with the City Planner, Steve Grittman
who indicated that this proposal was more consistent with what had originally been contemplated
for the area. The developer was proposing to have a letter drafted to the MOAA stating that the City
Council concurred with the proposed change. Roger Belsaas noted that the MOAA Board has
scheduled a public hearing at their September meeting on the proposed change. The staff was
directed to send a letter to the MOAA Board regarding the proposed change.
1
L
.
.
.
Council meeting - 8/9/99
Mike Gair added that Chelsea Road is an important component to this proposed development and
the developer has provided right-or-way for the road in the area where the developer has control
over the property. There was a brief discussion on the status of right-of-way acquisition in this
area.
5. Conscnt al!cnda.
Clint Herbst asked that items 5A, 5E and 5F be removed from the consent agenda for discussion.
A. Consideration of Change Order # 1 on County Road 75 Project 98-17C for realignment of
sewer. Recommendation: Approve Change Order #1 in the anlount of$20,140.59.
B. Consideration of a revised preliminary plat for RoUingWoods Subdivision.
Recommendation: Approve a motion to make a finding that the changes to the proposed
Rolling Woods plat do not constitute revisions which are significant enough to trigger a
new preliminary plat hearing.
C.
Consideration of accepting bids and awarding contract for Project 98-24C Booster Station.
Recommendation: Accept the bids and award the contract for the building, pumps, controls
and pressure sustaining station to Moorhead Construction, Inc. for a grand total base bid
01'$244,100.
D. Consideration of approval of plans and specifications - Chelsea Road East Improvement
Project 98-08C. Recommendation: Adopt a resolution approving the Chelsea Road
Improvement Project construction plans and specifications and authorizing advertisement
for bids.
E. Consideration of short term contract extension for operation of WWTP by PSG.
Recommendation: Authorize a one year extension with PSG for operations at the
Monticello Wastewater Treatment F aci lity with the operations cost to be $445,145, the same
as 1999, with the pass through costs continuing for electrical, gas and chemicals which is
estimated at an additional $83,000.
F. Consideration of confirming hiring of Night/Weekend Liquor Store Supervisor.
Recommendation: Confirm the hiring of Brenda Hegge as the replacement
Night/Weekend Liquor Store Supervisor.
G. Consideration of authorizing a $181,000 loan to HRA for advance TIF payment to
Midwest Graphics. Recommendation: Authorize the City to execute documents making
$181,000 loan to the HRA at 7% interest rate.
H.
Consideration of accepting submission of year end 1998 Authority and Municipal
Reports and Annual Disclosure. Recommendation: Move to acknowledge the receipt ofthe
TIF Authority and Municipal Reports and Annual Disclosure Statement for year end 1998.
2
.
.
.
Council meeting - 8/9/99
Authorize purchase of a new 2000L T -9500 Sterling cab and chassis from Boyer Trucks of
Minneapolis based upon the state contract bid of $69,730 plus sales tax for a total of
$74,262.45.
J. Consideration of accepting the vending company bid for the Monticello Community Center
and approving designation of the up-front cash payment on the vending contract.
Recommendation: Approve the vending contract with Bernick's Pepsi and approve the
designation of $20,000 up front cash payment as per the Small Group's suggestion.
BRUCE THIELEN MOVED THE AMENDED CONSENT AGENDA WITH TIIE DELETIONS
OF ITEMS SA, 5E AND SF AND THE ADDITION OF ITEMS 5K (RES. TO REIMBURSE
CERTAIN EXPENDITURES FROM BOND PROCEEDS) AND 5L (REJECT BIDS ON
WALNUT STREET EXTENSION AND INCLUDE WORK AS PART OF CHELSEA ROAD
PROJECT). CLINT HERBST SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED
UNANIMOUSL Y.
6.
Consideration of items removed from the consent a2:enda for discussion.
SA. Change Order #1 to Project 98-17C - Clint Herbst asked if the change order amount was
going to be picked up by the City or the property owner. Mike Nielsen from WSB indicated that the
work covered by the change order was done in exchange for permanent easement and that some of
the items covered in the change order would be needed in the future anyway. Approximately
$6,000-$8,000 of the change order amount were for items that would be needed in the future. A
portion of the cost is being picked up by trunk sewer fees. Clint Herbst asked about the easement
situation. Mike Nielson stated that the property owner is agreeable to granting the easement but the
easement description has not been prepared because the exact alignment of the pipe has not been
determined.
SE. Contract Extension for WWTP - It was proposed to extend the City's contract with PSG
through December 31,2000. Roger Belsaas stated he was of the understanding that the City was
considering going out for bids on the contract to operate the wastewater treatment plant. Public
Works Director, John Simola pointed out that the plant has only been in operation since May and
the City doesn't have good numbers on operating costs because of the limited time of operation. He
also added that the trained people who can operate the plant are employees of PSG and that the City
does not have any employees trained in the operation of the plant. John Simola reiterated that he
would like to have the figures for one full year of operation of the plant before the City take this
step. Clint Herbst stated that a six month extension would be more in line. It was noted that the
contract contained provisions so that it could be terminated prior to December 31, 2000.
SF Night/Weekend Liquor Store Supervisor - Clint Herbst asked about the staffing at the liquor
store and the hours the manager and assistant manager worked. Joe Hartman, Liquor Store Manager,
explained that both he and the assistant manager were in the store from 8-4 and the person proposed
to be hired would be thcre evenings and weekends. Clint Herbst questioned whether the assistant
manager could be scheduled so his hours overlapped with the time the evening supervisor would be
there, ie. 2 p.m. to 10 p.m.
3
.
Council meeting - 8/9/99
BRIAN STUMPF MOVED TO APPROVE ITEMS SA, 5E AND SF. ROGER CARLSON
SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
7. Review of six month liauor store report.
Joe Hartman, Liquor Store Manager, was present to review with the Council the operations of the
liquor store. It was noted that the sales appear not to have been impacted by the construction along
TH 25. Joe Hartman felt that the location ofthe building was one reason it has been so successful.
Clint Herbst asked about the storage and the dumpster being out of the enclosure area in the back.
Joe Hartman indicated that cardboard that is generated by the business is the reason for that.
Currently the cardboard bales are picked up onee a week but he wi 11 check with the hauler to see if
pickup could be made more often. There was discussion on the existing space and what amount of
space was needed. Joe Hartman stated at the present time there is 5600 sq. ft. of space and he
believes that to stay competitive the building would have to be expanded to 8000 sq. ft.
.
At this time the Council discussed future plans for the liquor store building. Rick Wolfsteller noted
that the request for proposals had gone out on the Ferrell Gas site which had incorporated the liquor
store. The City, however, had not fully determined whether the liquor store should have a new
building or expand the existing building. Before the City proceeds further with RFP's on the
Ferrell site the City should clarify its position on the liquor store facility. There was discussion on
if a new building was constructed where would it be located and how would it be financed. There
is room for expansion on the existing site and that option was discussed. Bruce Thielen suggested
that the City should consider doing a space needs study. The consensus ofthe Council was that
rather than look at constructing a new building, expansion ofthe existing facility should be
considered and any RFP should reflect that.
BRIAN STUMPF MOVED TO ACCEPT THE SIX MONTH LIQUOR STORE REPORT. BRUCE
THIELEN SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
8. Consideration of approvine: purchase of a video imagine: camera for the Fire Department.
Scott Douglas, Fire Chief, was present to explain the request and to allow the Council to examine
the video imaging camera the Fire Department is looking at. The Fire Department has an
opportunity to buy the used model at a substantial savings. They were requesting Council approval
of the purchase and would also be going before the Township. In addition, approximately $8,000
in donations would be applied towards the purchase of the camera.
.
CLINT HERBST MOVED TO APPROVE THE PURCHASE OF THE VIDEO IMAGING
CAMERA FOR THE FIRE DEPARTMENT FOR $15,500 WITH $8,000 RECEIVED IN
DONATIONS APPLIED TOWARDS THE PURCHASE. ROGER CARLSON SECONDED THE
MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
9.
Consideration of grantin~ an increase to the individual pension for Volunteer Firefie:hters
Relief Association members.
Brian Stumpf stated he would not be voting on this item as he is a vested member of the relief
4
.
Council meeting - 8/9/99
association. Mayor Belsaas if the City Administrator was comfortable with the proposed increase.
Rick Wolfsteller replied that there should be suiTicient revenue to handle the $2,025 and $2,050
increase but the $2,075 increase may require a contribution form the City.
CLINT IJERBST MOVED TO GRANT AN INCREASE OF $2,025 IN THE INDIVIDUAL
PENSION FOR THE VOLUNTEER FIREFIGHTER RELIEF ASSOCIATION MEMBERS AND
REVIEW IT AGAIN IN A YEAR. BRUCE THIELEN SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION
CARRIED WITH BRIAN STUMPF ABSTAINING.
10. Consideration of approving balance of schedule for user and rental fees and also policies for
the Monticello Communitv Center.
The Council reviewed the balance of the user and rental fees schedulc and also the policies for
the Monticello Community Center. One area of discussion was the possible conflict bctween
scheduled events with the times that the National Guard would need the facility. There were
qucstions and comments on the dress code, use of the telephone, decorations and security
requirements. The COlUlcil recommended that this be submitted to the City Attorney for review.
.
BRUCE THIELEN MOVED TO APPROVE TIrE FEES, RENTAL RATES AND POLICIES
AS PRESENTED AND SUBMIT IT TO THE CITY ATTORNEY FOR REVIEW. ROGER
CARLSON SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
11.
Consideration to authorize acquisition of a 7-foot walkway between Broadwav and Public
Parkin!! Lots.
Removed from agenda.
12. Consideration of preliminary plat and final plat for Hart Boulevard Addition - City of
Monticello.
John Simola, Public Works Director indicated that he had spoked to the property owners and they
had expressed their interest in purchasing the piece abutting their lot but the plat had not bcen
reviewed as far as easements.
CLINT HERBST MOVED TO APPROVE THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF THE HART
BOULEV ARD ADDITION SUBJECT TO REVIEW BY THE CITY STAFF AND CITY
ENGINEER FOR NECESSARY EASEMENTS. BRIAN STUMPF SECONDED THE MOTION.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
13.
Consideration of approval of plan allowin!! angle parkin!! at 108 Cedar Street.
.
Fred Patch made a presentation to the Council on the request for angle parking within the street
right-of-way. The Council asked ifthe applicant had seen the alternate parking plan prepared by the
staff. Fred Patch indicated that it was not submitted to the applicant. The Council also questioned
if there were commcnts from neighboring property owners. Fred patch stated that no public hearing
was required. Roger Belsaas felt that angle parking would increase the likelihood of accidents and
5
.
.
.
Council meeting - 8/9/99
that establishing angle parking in this area could set a precedent. There was some discussion on the
parking requirements and Clint Herbst suggested that if this matter came back, the city should notify
the adjacent property owners.
BRUCE THIELEN MOVED TO DENY I'HE PETITION FOR ANGLED PARKING IN THE
BOULEVARD AT 108 CEDAR STREET. BRIAN STUMPF SECONDED THE MOTION.
MOTION CARRIED WITH ROGER CARIJSON VOTING IN OPPOSITION.
Library Board Meetine Update
Bruce 'l'hielen reviewed with the Council the status of the roof repair and building repairs to the library.
However, he felt the City should look at the long term needs and suggested that a space needs study be done
and have the same firm conduct the space needs study for the liquor store. Fred Patch suggested
Blumentals Architecture, Inc. as a possibility.
BRUCE THIELEN MOVED TO AUTHORIZE BLUMENT ALS ARCHITECTURE, INC. TO
APPROACH THE LIBRARY BOARD AND THE LIQUOR STORE MANAGER TO CONDUCT SPACE
NEEDS STUDIES FOR THE LIBRARY AND THE LIQUOR STORE WITH THE INFORMATION TO
BE PRESENTED, IF POSSIBLE, AT THE SEPTEMBER 13TH COUNCIL MEETING. BRIAN STUMPF
SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Setting date for budget workshop
The time frame for approving the preliminary budget was discussed. At the September 13th meeting, the
Council should approve the preliminary budget for 2000. The City staff will be working on preparation of
the preliminary budget within the next week with a workshop meeting scheduled for August 23rd at 5 :30
p.m. The City Administrator will check into whether a public hearing is now required for the preliminary
budget as well as the final budget.
Clint Herbst asked about stop signs being installed on Gillard A venue at the crest of the hill. John Simola
stated that since part of the road is in the township they would have to be involved. In his opinion he did
not feel that stop signs were appropriate in this location.
Roger Belsaas asked about the blight situation at the Spur Station. Fred Patch updated him on what has
taken place to this point. Bruce Thielen asked if some type of report on the blight/nuisance incidents could
be submitted periodically to the Council. The Council discussed blight/nuisances and the enforcement of
the nuisance ordinances.
6
. Council meeting - 8/9/99
14. Consideration of bills for the month of AUl!Ust. 1999.
BRIAN STUMPF MOVED TO APPROVE PAYMENT OF BILLS. BRUCE THIELEN
SECONDED 'fHE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
BRIAN STUMPF MOVED TO ADJOURN AT 9 P.M. BRUCE THIELEN SECONDED THE MOTION.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Recording Secretary
.
.
7
.
SA.
.
.
Council Agenda ~ 08/23/99
Consideration of adootin~ a resolution aoproving Monticello Heartland Exoress
2000 Budget and Transit Assistance aoplication. (C.S., J.O.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
City Council is asked to review the proposed Monticello Heartland Express Budget Plan
for 2000 and adopt a resolution for City participation in funding the program. The
proposed Budget Plan does include some changes for 2000 which are itemized in the
following paragraphs.
The City intends to renew the contract with Hoglund Transportation for an additional
year as provided in the current contract as long as any increases do not exceed 4 perccnt.
The total cost to operate the Heartland Express in 2000 is projected at $89,297. This
would amount to a 3.24% increase in the Hoglund Transportation contract from $64,850
to $66,953 for 2300 hours of service. Other proposed budget costs are wages at $3,600;
dues, ticket printing and advertising at $900; and fuel at $5,300. In addition, we are
proposing to add an extra 400 hours of service provided through a second vehicle at a
cost of $11 ,644 for service and $900 for fuel. The proposal for additional hours will be
reviewed with Noel Shughart, MnDOT Regional Transit Director, and Hoglund
Transportation. The projected increases are to be included in the Transit Assistance
application which is subject to approval by the state.
The total projected budget 01'$89,297 would be funded by $14,000 in farebox revenue,
$21 ,719 local share through the City of Monticello, and the balance of the cost ($53,578)
would be paid by state and federal sources.
Ridership has maintained a fairly steady usage with the bus running continuously
throughout the day. It is projected that the Heartland Express will provide over 14,000
rides in 1999, which is less than was estimated when the transit plan application was
written last year. Some of the possible reasons that ridership numbers are not increasing
are:
a) It appears that our ridership has peaked at what the bus can currently
handle.
b) Recently, the Monticello-Big Lake Hospital District began operating a
clinic bus which provides rides for medical and related appointments.
c) With enlarged city boundaries, it takes longer to move riders across town.
d) Construction is impacting the time it takes to pick up and deliver riders.
We updated the bus brochure and have made it available again to the public. Our
Heartland Express bus service was also included in an advertising flyer put out by the
Wright County Transit Task Force featuring all the transit systems available in Wright
County. The proposed 2000 budget includes funds for marketing to increase exposure
and awareness of the Heartland Express bus service. Weare hoping to increase our
ridership to 18,000 for 2000 if we can offer the additional hours with a second vehicle.
.
Council Agenda - 08/23/99
We feel that there are enough upcoming changes that may impact ridership after 1999
such as annexation of Kjellberg' s West Mobile Home Park, 5t Benedict's Center senior
housing project, completion of the Community Center, downtown redevelopment, the
opening of another school, and the continued growth in the city. It is anticipated that any
or all of these could increase ridership noticeably if we can offer additional hours and
market thc bus service aggressively..
B. AL TERNA TIVE ACTIONS:
I. Motion to adopt a resolution approving the Heartland Express 2000 Budget Plan
and Transit Assistance application.
This option would provide a projected budget of $89,297 to operate the
Monticello Heartland Express Bus, with the city share at $21,719.
2. Motion to deny approval of the Heartland Express 2000 Budget Plan and Transit
Assistance application.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
.
Alternative #1 is recommended. The Heartland Express Bus is providing a cost-efficient
responsive transportation service to residents of the community. Cost increases have
stayed relatively low, while fares remain at no more than $1 per ride for city residents.
Reduced fare tickets are available in books of 40 for $25 and senior citizens receive 10
free tickets with each book of 40. We believe the Heartland Express provides a valuable
service for the citizens of our community and should be continued.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Resolution for adoption.
.
CITY OF MONTICELLO
.
RESOLUTION 99 - 45
Resolved that City of Monticello Heartland Express
enter into an Agreement with
the State of Minnesota to provide public transportation service in City of Monticello
Further resolved that City of Monticello Heartland Express
agrees to provide
40% percent of the total operating cost from local funds and 20% of the total capital costs.
Further resolved that authorization to execute the aforementioned Agreement and any
amendments thereto is hereby given to the Deputy City Administrator or the Finance
Assistant
Further resolved that the
Deputy City Administrator or the Finance
Assistant
is hereby authorized to execute requests for reimbursement to the Minnesota
Department of Transportation.
. CERTIFICATION
1 hereby certify that the foregoing resolution is a true and correct copy of the resolution presented
to and adopted by
23rd day of
City of Monticello at a duly authorized meeting thereof held on the
August
, 19 ~ as shown by the minutes of said meeting in my
possession.
City Administrator
Mayor
ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF NOTARY:
State of
County of
On , 19 , whom I know personally to be the signer of the above and
he/she acknowledged that he/she signed it.
.
Notary
5A
.
.
.
5.B.
City Council Agenda -08/23/99
Consideration of acceptill!! Environmental Assessment Worksheet for the Groveland
preliminary plat and authorize publication and advertisement for public comment.
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROlJND:
City Council is asked to consider accepting the Environmental Assessment worksheet
describing the affect of the Groveland plat on the environment. Council is also asked to
authorize publication of documentation for submittal to the public and various state agencies
for comment.
The next step in the EA W process involves review and response to comments, followed by
City Counci I consideration of a "Negative Declaration Impact". Approval ofthe preliminary
plat is contingent on the City Council making its declaration.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS
1.
Motion to accept the Environmental Assessment Worksheet and authorize
publication.
2.
Motion to deny acceptance of the Environmental Assessment Worksheet.
c. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
The City Administrator recommends alternative 1.
D. SUPPORTING DATA
Copy of the Environmental Assessment Worksheet.
.
.
.
Council Agenda - 08/23/99
SC.
Consideration of Resolution Declarin2: intent to Reimburse Project Costs throu!!h
Bond Sale Proceeds. (R.W.)
A.
REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND
Two additional improvemcnt projects that have recently been authorized or are in the proccss of
being bid relate to the Dundas Road Paving projcct adjacent A-Max Storage and the extension
of Chelsea Road East from Cedar Strcet to service the new Comfort Inn Suites and adjoining
properties. Ifthe City wants to be able to finance these improvements in the future through a
bond sale, this resolution should be adopted.
Assuming that the Chelsea Road East project bids are favorable, the total City cost ofthe various
projects we havc now in progress will be tabulated and a recommendation will be made to the
Council on the amount of a bond that may be needed. This will likely occur sometime in
September for Council consideration.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTION
1.
Adopt a resolution indicating the City's intent to reimburse itself through
a future bond sale for the projects noted.
c. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
The recommendation of the City Administrator is that the resolution be adopted to allow the
City to consider a bond sale in the future if needed. Adoption of the resolution does not
necessarily mean that the City has to proceed with the bond sale, only that it has the ability
to do so.
D. SUPPORTING DATA
Copy of resolution.
.
.
.
RESOLtJTION 99-44
RESOLtJTION DECLARING THE OFFICIAL INTENT OF THE
CITY OF MONTICELLO TO REIMBURSE
CERTAIN EXPENDITURES FROM THE PROCEEDS OF
BONDS TO BE ISSUED BY THE CITY
WHEREAS, the Internal Revenue Service has issued Treas. Reg. 1.150-2 providing that
proceeds of tax-exempt bonds used to reimburse prior expenditures will not be deemed spent
unless certain requirements are met; and
WI IEREAS, the City expects to incur certain expenditures which may be finance temporarily
from sources other than bonds, and reimbursed from the proceeds of a bond;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF TIIE CITY OF
MONTICELLO (THE "CITY") AS FOLLOWS:
I.
The City reasonably intends to make expenditures for the projects described in Exhibit A
(the "Projects"), and reasonably intends to reimburse itself for such expenditures from the
proceeds of debt to be issued by the City in the maximum principal amount described in
Exhibit A.
2. The City Administrator is authorized to designate appropriate additions to Exhibit A in
circumstances where time is of the essence, and any such designation shall be reported to
the Council at the earliest practicable date and shall be filed with the official books and
records of the City as provided in Section 3.
3. This resolution is intended to constitute a declaration of official intent for purposes of
Treas. Reg. 1.150-2 and any successor law, regulation, or ruling.
Adopted by the City Council this 23rd day of August, 1999.
Roger Belsaas, Mayor
ATTEST:
5C
Rick Wolfsteller, City Administrator
.
.
.
Resolution 99-42
Page 2
EXHIBIT A
TO OFFICIAL INTENT RESOLlJTION
ADOPTED AUGUST 9, 1999
MAXIMUM PRINCIPAL
DATE OF . AMOUNT OF DEBT
DECLARATION DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT FOR PROJECT
, , ,
8-23-99 Dundas Road Paving Project $ 48,000
Chelsea Road East Improvement
8-23-99 Project 98-08C $455,900
sc-
.
.
.
Council Agenda - 08/23/99
SE.
Consideration of aooroval of on-sale liquor license transfer - .J.P.s (R. W.)
A.
REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
A liquor license application has been received from Chad and Jennifer llinz who indicate
they are going to be acquiring the .T.P.'s restaurant and bar. As part ofthc transfcr, they are
requesting approval of the on-sale liquor license transfer to their name. They anticipate taking
over ownership of the restaurant sometime around September 1 Sl through 15th.
Council approval of this license transfer should be contingent upon the Hinz's providing proof of
liability insurance and background investigation to be conducted by the sheriff s department.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTION:
1. Counci 1 could authorize the on-sale liquor license for J. P. 's to be transferred to
the new owners, Chad and Jennifer Hinz.
2. Do not approve the transfer.
C.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Since the staff is not aware of any reason why the Hinz's would not qualify for an on-sale liquor
license, it is recommended that the license transfer be approved contingent upon submittal of
liquor liability insurance coverage.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
A copy of license application.
.
.
JClJa., ltno~
CITY OF MONTICELLO
LICENSE APPLICATION
This application is being submitted for the following license(s):
Set~up license
I On~sa1e, intoxicating liquor
On-sale, non-intoxicating liquor
_ Off-sale, non-intoxicating liquor
_ On~sale, wine
_ On-sale, wine/3.2 beer
Applicant Name: ChtuL '*:T~w J.h n2- Phone: (lPJJ) ~o-b,;J;) 7
Applicant Address: ~~~~AP'1'{.j'{p ~
Social Security #: LlIl.l}Cfir go IhO l Cha4/te of Birth:
H-~D-J J5-6JCJ-30d
if )1)1 J 7 d.
.
Driver's License #:
Business Name:
Business Address:
Business Phone:
MN Business ill #:
Describe nature of business operation:
bar <<:1-- P-esf-tWftU'd'
If Corporation:
Officers:
8f!!t!n t-h n2-
erutJ-fe/ I-J-1 r1 Z.
Directors:
Do you or does your corporation, partnership, etc., currently hold any license
allowing the sale of wine, intoxicating liquor, non-intoxicating liquor, or set-ups?
_Yes ANa
If yes:
Name of Business:
Business Address:
.
Business Phone:
Type of License:
Years Held:
LIQLIC.APP: 10/3/95
References:
.
~ - 2:i ?4
q, -,5;;/ /
~..E- 6r?35"
Credit References Qist at least one bank you do business with):
Name ~~ ~?~'~
~'!!/~~~L K~~~~~~fSD 4lJ/~/G7D
Amount of investment, excluding land: 315iJOD
(only applicants for on-sale, intoxicating liquor must provide this information)
Have you ever been convicted of a felony or of violating the National Prohibition Act
or any state law or ordinNt relating to manufacture or transportation of
intoxicating liquors? 0
I declare that the above information is true and correct to
;gIll) qc;
Date of Application
.
******************************************************************************
(For City Use Only)
Surety Bond
Liquor Liability
Insurance Certificate
Application Fee License Fee
Sheriff, Wright County Mayor
Date
City Admlnlstrator
.
Date
LIQLIC.APP: 1013/95
.
.
--
SF.
Council Meeting - 8/23/99
Consideration of Change Order No. 22 for the Monticello Wastewater Treatment
Plant Exuansion Project #93-14C. (J.8.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
Change Ordcr No. 22 involves two changc proposal requests (CPR's) for work at the
wastewater treatment plant expansion. The first CPR, # 186, involves rerouting softened
water for the boilers so that it would serve just the boilers and not the entire digestcr complex
and air compressor coolant. This change amounts to $2,547. The second change involved
demolition of some additional electrical conduit and instrumentation at the wastewater
treatment plant that was not shown on the old plant drawings and was discovered during
construction. That change amounted to $649. The total of the two changes is $3,196.
This brings the total amount for all change orders to date to $485,470.50, or 4.3% of the
original contract amount. This brings the final contract amount so far at the wastewater
treatment plant to $11,768,670.50.
Progress on finishing up the remaining items at the wastewater treatment plant is proceeding
well. Only final testing on the sludge covers, testing of the exceptional quality Class A
sludge heat pasteurization system, and a few punch list items remain to be completed. We
have yet to work out some final financial issues, however, with the contractor.
An open house is scheduled for Saturday, the 25th of September. More information on the
schedule and actual event will be forthcoming shortly.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. The first alternative is to approve Change Order No. 22 for City of Monticello Project
#93-14 C, Monticello Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion, in the amount of
$3,196.
2. The second alternative would be not to approve the change order.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is the recommendation ofthe City Administrator, Public Works Director, and HDR, our
consulting engineer, that the City Council approve Change Order No. 22 as outlined in
alternative #1.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of Change Order No. 22.
AUG-20-99 FRI 8:33 AM PUBLIC WORKS
i=lLL 19 '99 14:56 FR H[R ENGltEERl1'li tNC
A"t1'~. -
It
I'll ..
jl.,,~ '10
~
If
W" ."
.
. ;';,'.:
, ,~
"
.. 1'1
," ~
, '
~
lit- '
It" ~.
. "
HDR
project Name: WAS18Wlll9r T...erm91\t Plant ~.lon
Project o,vngc: Qt. MooticallO, UN
PrOject cootrac1Ol': AllOlrsorl ancI Pat9l!101'\
It II egl"ll'lClllO modify NConnc, metred to.bOYO u rono.l:
1
2
mo - eJIl'lta wal'k
FAX NO, 16122713272
612 591 5413 TO 92713272
P. 2/ 3
P.,01/02
Change Order No.. 22
~---~..Ij..,_.,......
HDR Prejeo\ No.; 0812Ao-OO4-166
..----~......-
>-
eon",
Dlcr.ul
o
o
6wmm1ry: It is li"- to moo;liry th. contract ,eferr. to abOve 'lIlallow$:
Conlfeot Pit!>> prior to this Change Order
L~,414.50
NiSrll'le'O~O (decreUI) of IfIIt Ct1.ng& Order
~.Jll6
FI&\llsed Contract price wlt\'l all approved Changl Orde"
ConlJilOO\ 11m. pr\OI' to thiS C~. OI'Cl$t
nterin'l COmplOtion Dales:
bruary Ut98. Uatch 1, t 99& and Apn11. 19ge
._J
...- -
NIllncreau (dloreas.) of It\lI CI'l.ngt Orela'
o
(' 1 ,768.670,$0 Interim ComplQlJon D8.tes:
Febl\l'lY 1, 1.. Maf~ 1, 1 eea ancl Aj:Il'.l '. , Si8
,"alOo ' . ,
'theeha.,geSTtlcIUded In tl\1' C/'II"I' Qtdtt .,. to bt aocomp"SI'IM lit ...ordanc' with the terml. .tlpulatlonl anlJ'
e61\dltlcn, ef till Mlgln.1 Conne. a tltoug" IftelucfIN fh....ift.
~.. "'~"" .
Lma~[j.h)~>
Ascomm~ndQd ror ApPl'Cl~a1lly (MDA Engineering, Inc.)
~rovtd fur O'f/nllr I>>y:
Oi.~,ibl.lllon~ L--JOwn.r
Revfled CootT...\ Time wltn all APprovl!ld CrJll.nge c~der.s
J
L-JconnftOl'
I
Artal
L-J0fflc.
I
Dare
I 'bli'i /'11
tlare
I
0<<.1.
L-J'II'" LJIMf'
II
fOJlM U,","lo.a (VllSlcIIl,O 0<' llO'l
ccp)l1prl"IIl.Pl\ pgltJWill$o I...
--1
I
----ll
T... mo
S'F'
III-'O:<!-%
FAX NO. 16122713272
AUG 19 ''39 14;5G F=R HDR ENGlNEERlHJ INC G12 591 5413 TO 92713272
AUG-20-99 FRI
8: 33 AM
PUBLl C WORKS
.
Change ()rd8r No. 22
Wa:r.tewatiK Tfi.unent Plant Expan$iOn
MonticellO, UN
I.
II'?:
J
"II :+
",. ,.
o ,...
DescriPtion
\iiei1ifPR NO:'
\, ,e6 fie-routed softefltO pW lor DoillJl5
" f'I>tOQ'" Citt ....._." _.... _,od pW" ,,",or"""" w.... "" non-
'p ~ to re t tertl
_2 ' l'.:leotrical demolllion item& . e)CtrA WO","
Put S8'. In'Ei\TV(T\llnt5 not ~ <In oeM
\
,
" \
'1\1
.';"., i 1
. I '
. ,~. l1li1 \
\
\
\
I
\
To co NO, at:
Drllll'le' Can~ Amounr.
Ch,nge orClM NO.
1
2
II
Sl1.UUQO.oo
.
$0.00
(".;.Q1,00)
~.e~.OO
"o,a76,OO
S10,&35.oo
" a,g&2.,~O
539,882.00
$25.143,00
So.QC1
1;'7,047.00
ISt,201,QO
526.074.00
$0.00
52',174.50
156.041.00
S32,024.oo
S9!.542.50
S20,2'0.00
$Ia,081.oo
$.,21 , .00
110,181.00
SS,1'6.oo
II
II
1
8
sA
10
11
.. ..
!I't, '"
~~' I,,.
12
13
14
15
\8
'1
18
Ii
20
21
22
_ $4I!.470.!!!L ...ao~ QlCll'i\YoW~gnI''''-'
o"n\' 51' ,7t;8 l31O.iO
. '.-
~" i'
. .
.
,......
II
i~1,'1'
" I
. .
.
rs
r, J! J
P.12I2/02
AnIOU~
$2.541
eel4S
---
U 198.00
--
.,...,.
*'" TOTAL PAGE.12I2 11<:+:
.
.
SG.
.
City Council Agenda - 8/23/99
Consideration to approve a resolution calling for a public hearing by the City Council on
the proposed adoption of Business Subsidy Criteria. (O.K.)
A Reference and Background:
The City Council is asked to call for a public hearing date of September 13, 1999, for the
consideration to adopt the Business Subsidy Criteria for the City of Monticello.
This becomes necessary as the legislature repealed the existing Section 116J.991, Article
12 of the omnibus tax bill and enacted new rules governing all business subsidies granted
by state and local government. A business subsidy includes a grant, contribution of
property or infrastructure, the principal amount of a loan at rates below those
commercially available, reduction or deferral of any tax or fee, any guarantee of any
payment of any loan, lease, obligation, or any preferential use of governmental facilities.
Numerous items are expressly excluded such as a subsidy ofless than $25,000.
All business subsidies must meet a public purpose other than increasing the tax base. Job
retention is a public purpose only where job loss is imminent and demonstrable. Before
granting any subsidy, a grantor must have adopted criteria for awarding business subsidies
at a public hearing. The criteria must include a policy regarding wages.
The grantor and recipient must enter a subsidy agreement and the agreement must be
approved by the local elected governing body, which means any assistance provided by an
HRA or EDA requires approval by the corresponding city council. The agreement must
include wage and job goals. A public hearing is required for any local government
subsidy over $100,000. The agreement must, at a minimum, require a recipient failing to
meet the stated goals to repay the assistance in hold or partial plus interest. The recipient
must file detailed reports to the grantor for 2 years following the benefit date.
The City of Monticello would be a grantor in the case where the City receives a grant
from the State and the City then lends the grant money to a business (recipient). Another
case would be when the City contributes greater than $25,000 of trunk fees or other
reductions as the Local 10% HACA Contribution for TIF.
The HRA is the grantor for TlF and the EDA is the grantor for the GMEF and DMEF
programs. However, in the future the HRA and EDA subsidy agreements or private
redevelopment contracts will be considered for approval by the Council. The criteria for
the HRA has been drafted and reviewed by the HRA and their attorney with the HRA
public hearing and adoption scheduled for September 8, 1999. A draft copy of the
criteria for the EDA is written for review by the attorney prior to the EDA public hearing
scheduled for August 31, 1999. Attached is a copy of the proposed Business Subsidy
Criteria for the HRA and EDA The City's criteria will be similar in part or hold. Should
1
City Council Agenda - 8123/99
you have specific recommendations to include in the City's criteria, please contact me.
Also, if you have questions or comments on the proposed HRA and EDA criteria, please
contact me. It is important for the governmental bodies to hold the public hearings and
adopt their respective criteria, as the EDA has a request for funding from Aroplax. And
with Twin Die Casting selecting Monticello as their site location, will come the requests
for TIF, GMEF, and the State Grant assistance.
B. Alternative Action:
1. A motion to approve a resolution calling for a public hearing by the City Council
on the proposed Business Subsidy Criteria.
2. A motion to deny approval ofthe resolution.
3. A motion to table any action.
C. Recommendation:
The City Administrator's recommendation is Alternative No.1.
D. Supporting Data:
Copy of the resolution for adoption and HRA and EDA criteria for review.
2
CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO:
RESOLUTION CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING BY
THE CITY COUNCIL ON THE PROPOSED ADOPTION OF
BUSINESS SUBSIDIES CRITERIA.
WHEREAS, the State Legislature has adopted Minnesota Statutes, Sections 116J. 993 to
1161.995 (the "Statute") governing business subsidies granted by cities; and
WHEREAS, thc City of Monticello (the "City") fits the definition of "grantor" in the
Statute; and
WHEREAS, a grantor is required to adopt a set of criteria for awarding business
subsidies.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (the "Council") for the
City of Monticello, Minnesota, as follows:
Section 1. Public Hearing. The City Council shall meet on Monday, -_.'
1999, at approximately 7:00 p.m., to hold a public hearing on the proposed adoption of criteria
for awarding business subsidies in accordance with the Statute; and
Section 2. Notice of Public Hearing. City staff is authorized and directed to work with
Ehlers and Associates, Inc., to prepare the criteria. The City Administrator is authorized and
directed to cause notice of the hearing to be published at least once in the official newspaper of
the City not later than 10 days prior to , 1999, and to place a copy of the
proposed criteria on file in the City Administrator's office at City Hall and to make such copy
available for inspection by the public.
Dated:
Adopted:
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Administrator
E) G)
/)~.ItJ:,.
MONTICELLO
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
IN AND FOR THE CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA
Business Subsidy Criteria
Public Hearing and Adoption the _ day of
, 1999.
1. PURPOSE
1 :01 The purpose of this document is to establish the Housing and Redevelopment Authority's
criteria for granting of business subsidies, as defined in Minnesota Statutes 116J. 993,
Subdivision 3, for private development. This criteria shall be used as a guide in processing
and reviewing applications requesting business subsidies.
1:02 The criteria set forth in this document are guidelines only. The Housing and
Redevelopment Authority reserves the right in its discretion to approve business subsides
that vary from the criteria stated herein if the Housing and Redevelopment Authority
determines that the subsidy nevertheless serves a public purpose.
1: 03 The Housing and Redevelopment Authority may amend the business subsidy criteria at
any time. Amendments to these criteria are subject to public hearing requirements
pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 1161.993 through 1161.994.
2. ST A TUTORY LIMIT A TIONS
2:01 In accordance with the Business Subsidy Criteria, Business Subsidy requests must comply
with applicable State Statutes. The Housing and Redevelopment Authority ability to grant
business subsidies is governed by the limitations established in Minnesota Statutes
1161.993 through 1161.994.
3. PUBLIC POLICY REQUIREMENT
3:01 All business subsidies must meet a public purpose other than increasing the tax base. Job
retention may only be used as a public purpose in cases where job loss is imminent and
demonstrable.
1
5~
MonticeJlo City Hall, 250 E. Broadway, PO Box 1147, Monticello, MN 55362-9245' (612) 295~2711 . Fax: (612) 295-4404
Office of Public Works, 909 Golf Course Rd., Monticello, MN 55362 . (612) 295~3170 . Fax: (612) 271-3272
BRA Business Subsidy Criteria
4. BUSINESS SUBSIDY AFPROY AL CRITERIA
4: 0 1 All new projects approved by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority should meet the
following minimum approval criteria. However, it should not be presumed that a project
meeting these criteria will automatically be approved. Meeting these criteria creates no
contractual rights on the part of any potential developer or the Housing and
Redevelopment Authority.
4:02 The project must be in accord with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinances, or
required changes to the plan and ordinances must be under active consideration by the
City at; the time of approval.
4:03 Business subsidies will not be provided to projects that have the financial feasibility to
proceed without the benefit of the subsidy. In effect, business subsidies will not be
provided solely to broaden a developer's profit margins on a project.
4:04 Prior to approval of a business subsidies financing plan and when deemed appropriate by
the Housing and Redevelopment Authority, the developer shall provide any required
market and financial feasibility studies, appraisals, soil boring, information provided to
private lenders for the project, and other information or data as requested.
4:05 A recipient of a business subsidy must make a commitment to continue operations at the
site where the subsidy is used for at least five years after the benefit date.
4:06 Recipients of any business subsidy will be required to meet wage and job goals determined
by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority on a case-by-case basis, giving
consideration to the nature of the development, the purpose of the subsidy, local economic
conditions, and situational circumstances.
5. TAX INCREMENT PROJECT EY ALUATION CRITERIA
5:01 The Housing and Redevelopment Authority will utilize Tax Increment Financing to
support the community's long-term economic, redevelopment, and housing goals.
5: 02 Each Tax Increment Financing subsidy will be analyzed and evaluated by the Housing and
Redevelopment Authority. Each project shall be measured against the general criteria in
Sections 1 through 6 and the specific criteria in this Section 5 applicable to tax increment
financing business subsidies.
5:03 Following are the evaluation criteria that will be used by the Housing and Redevelopment
2
5G
HRA Business Subsidy Criteria
Authority.
A. All business subsidy requests shall meet the "but for" test. The "but for" test
means that the project would not develop solely on private investment in the
reasonable future. The developer shall provide findings for the "but for" test.
B. Business subsidy requests should create the highest feasible number of jobs on site
from date of occupancy where deemed appropriate.
c. For manufacturing and warehousing business subsidy requests, at least 90% ofthe
jobs created must pay a wage of at least 160% of the federal minimum wage
requirement for individuals over the age of20. Annual written reports are required
until termination date. Failure to meet the job and wage level goals require partial
or full repayment of the assistance with interest.
D . F or other business subsidy requests, jobs created must meet as a minimum the
federal minimum wage requirement. Annual written reports are required until
termination date. Failure to meet the job and wage level goals require partial or
full repayment of the assistance with interest.
E. All business subsidy requests should create the highest possible ratio of property
taxes paid before and after redevelopment.
F. Business subsidy requests should facilitate redevelopment or elimination of
"substandard" or "blighted" areas where deemed appropriate.
G. Business subsidy requests should facilitate the "clean-up" of environmentally
unsound property where deemed appropriate.
H. Business subsidy requests should increase moderate priced housing options for
area residents where deemed appropriate.
1. All business subsidy requests should be deemed to promote additional desired
"spin-off' development.
1. All business subsidy requests should demonstrate "community involvement"
including demonstrated degrees of the various factors:
a) Local residency ofthe company's owners and employees, or
b) Local residency of the contractors involved in the project, or
c) Membership in local business organizations, or
d) Other similar factors.
3
s [~
lIRA Business Subsidy Criteria
6. PROCEDURES
*
Meet with appropriate Staff to discuss the scope of the project, public participation
being required, and other information as may be necessary.
The request shall be reviewed by Staff on a preliminary basis as to the feasibility of
the project.
The project concept shall be placed on the Housing and Redevelopment Authority
agenda for concept review. The applicant will make a presentation of the project
Staffwill present its findings.
If the Housing and Redevelopment Authority's concept review is positive, Staff
will provide the City Council with an informational concept review.
The applicant will execute and submit the Preliminary Development Agreement
accompanied by a non-refundable fee of $5,000.
*
*
*
*
*
Building and site plans submitted to the Chief Building Official.
If Planning and Zoning Commission action is required, it will be necessary for the
applicant, at this time, to make application to the Commission.
*
*
Staff will authorize the following steps:
_ Preparation for establislunent of the Tax Increment Finance District and the Tax
Increment Financing Plan if required.
_ Preparation of the Private Redevelopment Contract (Subsidy Agreement) based
upon agreed terms.
When action is required for the Tax Increment Finance Plan, Private
Redevelopment Contract, or Zoning/Ordinance; the Housing and Redevelopment
Authority, Commission, and City Council shall take appropriate action such as
public hearings and consideration of approvals.
Building permit issued after the Tax Increment Finance District and Plan is
approved by City Council, the Private Redevelopment Contract is executed by the
developer and the Housing and Redevelopment Authority, and the Building Pennit
Fees are paid.
*
*
4
SC7
HRA Business Subsidy Criteria
Eligible Tax Increment Finance expenditures: Land acquisition, site improvements, public
improvements, and demolition and relocation costs.
Tax Increment Finance time: Generally six to eight weeks from time of authorization to begin
drafting plan and contract.
Zoning/Ordinance time: Varies per project.
busub.crit
5
SG
--
~~.A
"1:-,.
.
MONTICELLO
ECONONfiCDEVELOPMENTAUTHORnY
IN AND FOR THE CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA
Business Subsidy Criteria
Public Hearing and Adoption the _ day of
, 1999.
1. PURPOSE
1:01 The purpose of this document is to establish the Economic Development Authority's
criteria for granting of business subsidies, as defined in Minnesota Statutes 1161.993,
Subdivision 3, for private development. This criteria shall be used as a guide in processing
and reviewing applications requesting business subsidies.
.
1:02 The criteria set forth in this document are guidelines only. The Economic Development
Authority reserves the right in its discretion to approve business subsides that vary from
the criteria stated herein if the Economic Development Authority determines that the
subsidy nevertheless serves a public purpose.
.
1: 03 The Economic Development Authority may amend the business subsidy criteria at any
time. Amendments to these criteria are subject to public hearing requirements pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes, Sections 1161.993 through 1161.994.
2. STATUTORY LIMITATIONS
2:01 In accordance with the Business Subsidy Criteria, Business Subsidy requests must comply
with applicable State Statutes. The Economic Development Authority ability to grant
business subsidies is governed by the limitations established in Minnesota Statutes
1161.993 through 116J.994.
3. PUBLIC POLICY REQUIREMENT
.
3:01 All business subsides must meet a public purpose other than increasing the tax base. Job
retention may only be used as a public purpose in cases where job loss is imminent and
demonstrable.
1
.
s~
Monticello City Hall. 250 E. Broadway. PO Box 1147. Monticello, MN 55362-9245 . (612) 295-2711 . Fax: (612) 295-4404
Office of Puhlic Works, 909 Golf Course Rd., Monticello, MN 55362. (612) 295-3170. Fax: (612) 271-3272
. EDA Business Subsidy Criteria .
4. BUSINESS SUBSIDY APPROVAL CRITERIA
4:01 All new projects approved by the Economic Development Authority should meet the
following minimum approval criteria. However, it should not be presumed that a project
meeting these criteria will automatically be approved. Meeting these criteria creates no
contractual right on the part of any potential developer or the Economic Development
Authority.
4:02 The project must be in accord with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance, or
required changes to the plan and ordinances must be under active consideration by the
City at, the time of approval.
4:03 Prior to approval of a business subsidies financing plan and when deemed appropriate by
the Economic Development Authority, the developer shall provide any required market
and financial feasibility studies, appraisals, soil boring, information provided to private
lenders for the project, and other information or data as requested.
4:04 A recipient of a business subsidy must make a commitment to continue operations at the
site where the subsidy is used for a least five years after the benefit date.
. 4:05 Recipients of any business subsidy will be required to meet wage and job goals determined .
by the Economic Development Authority on a case-by-case basis, giving consideration to
the nature of the development, the purpose of the subsidy, local economic conditions, and
situational circumstances.
5. GREATER MONTICELLO ENTERPRISE FUND PROJECT EVALUATION
CRITERIA
5:01 The Economic Development Authority will utilize the Greater Monticello Enterprise Fund
to support the community's long-term economic goals.
5:02 Each Greater Monticello Enterprise Fund subsidy will be analyzed and evaluated by the
Economic Development Authority. Each project shall be measured against the general
criteria in Sections 1 through 4 and the specific criteria in this Section 5 applicable to the
Greater Monticello Enterprise Fund subsidies.
5:03 Following are the evaluation criteria that will be used by the Economic Development
Authority.
.
.
2
sc?
EDA Business Subsidy Criteria
GREATER MONTICELLO ENTERPRISE FUND GUIDELINES
.
CITY OF MONTICELLO
250 EAST BROADWAY
MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA 55362
(612) 295-2711
.
INTRODUCTION
The purpose of the Greater Monticello Enterprise Fund (GMEF) is to encourage economic
development by supplementing conventional financing sources available to existing and new
businesses. Through this program administered by the Economic Development Authority and
participating lending institution(s), loans are made to businesses to help them meet a portion of their
financing needs. All loans must serve a public purpose by complying with four or more of the
criteria noted in the next section. In all cases, it is mandatory that criteria #1 be satisfied, which
requires the creation of new jobs. It is the responsibility ofthe EDA to assure that loans meet the
public purpose standard and comply with all other GMEF policies as defined in this document.
Along with establishing the definition of public purpose, this document is designed to outline the
process involved in obtaining GMEF financing.
DEFINITION OF PUBLIC PURPOSE
.
1.
To provide loans for credit worthy businesses that create new jobs.
(a) One job is equivalent to a total of 37.5 hours per week.
.
(b) At least 90% of the jobs to pay a rate equal to or greater than 160% of the federal
minimum wage, exclusive of benefits, for individuals over the age of20 during the
term of the assistance. Annual written reports are required until termination date.
Failure to meet the job and wage level goals require partial or full repayment of
the assistance with interest.
2. To provide loans for credit worthy businesses that would increase the community tax base.
3. To assist new or existing industrial or commercial businesses to improve or expand their
operations. Considerations for loans shall take into account factors including, but not limited
to, the nature and extent of the business, the product or service involved, the present
availability of the product or service within the city of Monticello, the compatibility of the
proposed business as it relates to the comprehensive plan and existing zoning policies, and
the potential for adverse environmental effects of the business, if any.
4. To provide loans to be used as a secondary source of financing that is intended to supplement
conventional financing (bank financing).
.
5.
To provide loans in situations in which a funding gap exists.
.
6. To provide funds for economic development that could be used to assist in obtaining other
funds such as Small Business Administration loans, federal and state grants, etc.
KARENIOFFICEIPOLlCIESIGMEF: 8/31/99
3
SG
.
EDA Business Subsidy Criteria
THE GREATER MONTICELLO ENTERPRISES
REVOLVING LOAN FUND POLICIES
.
I. BUSINESS ELIGIBILITY
*
Industrial businesses
Non-competitive commercial businesses which enhance the community
Businesses located within the city of Monticello
Credit worthy existing businesses
Non-credit worthy start-up businesses with worthy feasibility studies (Deny all
historical non-credit worthy businesses)
$10,000 loan per each job created, or $5,000 per every $20,000 increase in property
market valuation, or $5,000 per every $20,000 increase in personal property used for
business purposes, whichever is higher.
*
*
*
*
*
II. FINANCING METHOD
* COMP ANION
DIRECT LOAN - Example: Equity 20%, RLF 30%, and bank 50%.
(All such loans may be subordinated to the primary
lender(s) if requested by the primary lender(s). The
. RLF loan is leveraged and the lower interest rate of .
the RLF lowers the effective interest rate on the entire
project.)
* PARTICIPATION LOAN- RLF buys a portion of the loan (the RLF is not in a
subordinate position, no collateral is required by the
RLF, and the loan provides a lower interest rate).
* GUARANTEE LOANS - RLF guarantees a portion of the bank loan. (Personal
and real estate guarantees handled separately.)
III. USE OF PROCEEDS
.
*
*
*
Real property acquisition and development
Real property rehabilitation (expansion or improvements)
Machinery and equipment
.
sG
KARENIOFFICEIPOLlCIESIGMEF: 8/31/99
4
EDA Business Subsidy Criteria
. IV. TERMS AND CONDITIONS .
* LOAN SIZE - Minimum of$5,000 and maximum not to exceed 50% of the
remaining revolving loan fund balance; for example, if the
remaining revolving loan fund balance is $50,000, the
maximum loan issuance is $25,000.
* LEVERAGING - Minimum 60% private/public non-GMEF
Maximum 30% public (GMEF)
Minimum 10% equity EDA loan
* LOAN TERM - Personal property term not to exceed life of equipment
(generally 5-7 years). Real estate property maximum of 5-
year maturity amortized up to 30 years. Balloon payment at
5 years.
* INTEREST RATE- Fixed rate not less than 2% below Minneapolis prime rate.
Prime rate per National Bank of Minneapolis on date of ED A
loan approval.
* LOAN FEE - Minimum fee 01'$200 but not to exceed 1.5% ofthe total loan
. project. * Fees are to be documented and no duplication of .
fees between the lending institution and the RLF. Loan fee
may be incorporated into project cost. EDA retains the right
to reduce or waive loan fee or portion of loan fee.
*Fee to be paid by applicant to the EDA within 5
working days after City Council approval of GMEF
loan. Nonrefundable.
*
PREPAYMENT
POLICY -
No penalty for prepayment.
*
DEFERRAL OF
PAYMENTS -
1.
Approval of the EDA membership by majority vote.
2.
Extend the balloon ifunable to refinance, verification
letter from two lending institutions subject to Board
approval.
.
.
sC:,
KARENIOFFICEIPOLlCIESIGMEF: 8/31/99
5
.
.
.
*
INTEREST
LIMITATION ON
GUARANTEED
LOANS-
*
ASSUMABILITY
OFLOAN-
*
BUSINESS EQUITY
REQUIREMENTS -
*
COLLATERAL-
*
NON-PERFORMANCE -
*
NON-PERFORMANCE
EXTENSION -
*
LEGAL FEE -
EDA Business Subsidy Criteria
.
Subject to security and/or reviewal by EDA.
None.
Subject to type of loan; Board of Directors will
determine case by case, analysis under normal lending
guidelines.
*
Liens on real property in project (mortgage
deed).
Liens on real property in business (mortgage
deed).
Liens on real property held personally (subject
to Board of Directors - homestead exempt).
Machinery and equipment liens (except
equipment exempt from bankruptcy).
Personal and/or corporate guarantees (requires
unlimited personal guarantees).
.
*
*
*
*
An approved GMEF loan shall be null and void if
funds are not drawn upon or disbursed within 180
days from date of ED A approval.
The 180-day non-performance date can be extended
up to an additional 120 days.
1. A written request is received 30 days prior to
expiration of the 180-day non-performance
date.
2. Approval of the EDA membership by majority
vote.
Responsibility of the GMEF applicant.
The Greater Monticello Enterprise Fund is operated as an equal opportunity program. All applicants
shall have equal access to GMEF funds regardless of race, sex, age, marital status, or other personal
characteristics.
KAREN\OFFICE\POLlCIES\GMEF: 8/31/99
.
t;c:'
6
EOA Business Subsidy Criteria
.
ORGANIZATION
.
The Greater Monticello Enterprise Fund is administered by the City of Monticello Economic
OevelopmentAuthority (EOA), which is a seven-member board consisting oftwo Council members
and five appointed members. EDA members are appointed by the Mayor and confirmed by the City
Council. Formal meetings are held on a quarterly basis. Please see the by-laws of the EDA for more
information on the structure of the organization that administers the Greater Monticello Enterprise
Fund.
PARTICIPATING LENDING INSTITUTION(S)
1. Participating lending institutions(s) shall be determined by the GMEF applicant.
2. Participating lending institution(s) shall cooperate with the EDA and assist in carrying out
the policies of the GMEF as approved by the City Council.
3. Participating lending institution(s) shall analyze the formal application and indicate to the
EDA the level at which the lending institution will participate in the finance package.
LOAN APPLICATION/ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES
.
The EDA desires to make the GMEF loan application process as simple as possible. However,
certain procedures must be followed prior to EDA consideration of a loan request. Information
regarding the program and procedures for obtaining a loan are as follows:
.
City Staff Duties:
The Economic Development Director, workinginconjunctionwith the Assistant City Administrator,
shall carry out GMEF operating procedures as approved by the EDA and Council. Staff is
responsible for assisting businesses in the loan application process and will work closely with
applicants in developing the necessary information.
Apolication Process:
1. Applicant shall complete a preliminary loan application. Staff will review application for
consistency with the policies set forth in the Greater Monticello Fund Guidelines. Staff
consideration of the preliminary loan application should take approximately one week.
Staffwill ask applicant to contact a lending institution regarding financing needs and indicate
to applicant that further action by the EDA on the potential loan will require indication of
support from a lending institution.
.
2.
If applicant gains initial support from lending institution and if the preliminary loan
application is approved, applicant is then asked to complete a formal application. If the
preliminary loan application is not approved by staff, the applicant may request that the EDA
consider approval of the preliminary application at the next regularly scheduled meeting of
the EDA.
.
KAREN\OFFICE\POLlCIES\GMEF: 8/31/99
7
5G
EDA Business Subsidy Criteria
. 3. Ifthe preliminary loan application is approved, applicant shall complete a formal application. .
Formal application shall include a business plan which will include its management
structure, market analysis, and financial statement. Like documentation necessary for
obtaining the bank loan associated with the proposal is acceptable. Attached with each
formal application is a written release of information executed by the loan applicant.
4. City staff will meet with applicant and other participating lender(s) to refine the plan for
financing the proposed enterprise.
5. City staff shall analyze the formal application and financial statements contained therein to
determine if the proposed business and finance plan is viable. Staff may, at its discretion,
accept the findings of a banking institution regarding applicant credit and financial viability
of the project. After analysis is complete, City staff shall submit a written recommendation
to the EDA. A decision regarding the application shall be made by the EDA within 60 days
of the submittal of a completed formal application.
6. The EDA shall have authority to approve or deny loans; however, within 21 days of EDA
approval, the City Council may revetse a decision by the EDA to approve a loan if it is
determined by Council that such loan was issued in violation of GMEF guidelines.
7. Prior to issuance of an approved loan, the City Attorney shall review andlor prepare all
. contracts, legal documents, and intercreditor agreements. After such review is complete, the .
City shall issue said loan.
ORIGINAL REVOLVING LOAN FUNDING
"LETTER OF CREDIT" FROM MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL - $200,000
SOURCE - City Liquor Store Fund
City shalI transfer needed loan amount from existing accounts at such time that individual loans are
approved. Revenue created through this program shall be under the control of the EDA and shall
not be transferred to City funds unless the City Council determines that reserves generated are not
necessary for the successful operation of the Authority. If such is the case, such funds must be
transferred to the debt service funds of the City to be used solely to reduce tax levies for bonded
indebtedness ofthe City (see Section 5 B ofthe ordinance establishing the Monticello EDA).
REPORTING
\. Staff shalI submit quarterly summaries andlor annual report detailing the status of the
Monticello Enterprise Fund.
.
FUND GUIDELINES MODIFICATION
.
1.
At a minimum, the EDA shall review the Fund Guidelines on an annual basis. No changes
to the GMEF guidelines shall be instituted without prior approval of the City Council.
SG
8
KAREN\OFFICE\POLlCIES\GMEF: 8/31/99
.
.
.
EDA Business Subsidy Criteria
LOAN ADMINISTRATION
1. City staff shall service City loan, shall monitor City position with regard to the loan, and
shall assure City compliance with intercreditor agreement.
2. All loan documents shall include an intercreditor agreement which must include the
following:
A. Definition of loan default, agreements regarding notification of default.
B. Agreements between lending institution and City regarding reproduction of pertinent
information regarding the loan.
3.
All loan documentation shall include agreements between borrower and lenders regarding
release of privacy regarding the status of the loan.
KARENIOFFICEIPOLlCIESIGMEF: 8131199
9
5~
.
.
.
. Council Meeting H 8/23/99
5I1. Consideration of median liehtine: system for County Road 75 East. (1.S.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
The City Council, at an earlier meeting, while reviewing the CR 75 plans, deleted all of the
pathway lighting but kept seven double fixture light poles on the median at several key
locations. These key locations were at points where the median tapered or was the widest
and longest. City staff indicated to the engineer that we wish to have the general contractor
on the highway project bid the lighting as an alternate but then also have Northern States
Power (NSP), our local electrical supplier, bid the project as well. NSP includes all
maintenance and an extended 25-year warranty on the system.
Since only the underground work such as the light bases, conduit and junction boxes were
included in the original CR 75 bid, it was necessary to put together specifications for the
poles and fixtures, wiring and control boxes so that we could get a complete bid from the
general contractor prior to getting a bid from NSP.
.
City staff asked the assistance of the Monticello Design Advisory Team to select both the
pole and fixture to be used on the project as it would be an entrance to the city of Monticello.
The design advisory team and staff looked at the aesthetic purpose of the seven light poles
with double fixtures, but also the safety purpose to light the roadway and possibly spill some
lighting over to the pathway. Since the purpose of the lighting system itself was not to light
that end of the city up like an airport runway, the design advisory team and staff
unanimously selected the high performance 150 watt, high pressure sodium, Acorn fixture,
manufactured by King, along with an ornamental fiberglass pole. This light and pole
combination is aesthetically pleasing, has very good lighting characteristics, and is in the
low to moderate price range. The poles will also include a receptacle to be used for seasonal
lighting and irrigation controllers.
The design advisory team recommends that the Acorn lighting be used on the entrances to
the city and the Colonial lighting to be used in the downtown area, as well as the Walnut
corridor. When the round globe ornamental streetscape fixtures reach their useful life they
should be replaced with the Colonial lighting fixtures.
The bids for the lighting are as follows:
R. L. LARSON:
Light bases, underground conduit, and junction boxes ................... $21,206.00
.
7 fiberglass, fluted, decorative poles with receptacles, and 14 high
performance Acorn lights, to include all wiring and controllers ......... $64,247.00*
TOT AL BID $85,453.00
. This is a bid by Granite City Electric, R. L. Larson's subcontractor on the job, and does not include a markup
allowed to R. L. Larson.
.
Council Agenda - 08/23/99
NSP:
7 fiberglass, fluted, Washington light poles with receptacles bases, and 14 high
performance Acorn fixtures, including all wiring, controls, conduits, bases
and installation ................................................ $60,790.00
Seven sets of banner brackets ....................................... $1,025.06
TOT AL BID $61,815.06
The difference between the two bids is $23,637.94. The system provided by R. L. Larson
would be owned and maintained by the City of Monticello, with a I-year warranty. We
would pay the monthly lighting bill at two separate service cabinets, which is estimated to
be under $1,000 per year.
The bid from NSP includes everything as the bid from R. L. Larson, with the exception that
it includes a banner support at each pole and a 25-year warranty which includes bulb
changes. The charge per fixture per month would be $7.65, which includes the electrical
charge, for a total of $1,285.20 per year. This is a few hundred dollars higher than strictly
paying for the electrical charge as with the system provided by the highway contractor.
.
B.
ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. The first alternative would be to award the lighting contract for the median lighting
on CR 75 East to NSP for a cost of$61,815.06.
2. The second alternative would be to award the contract for the median lighting on
CR 75 East to R. L. Larson at an estimated cost of$85,453.00 (this does not include
the markup on subcontractors by R. L. Larson for the poles, fixtures, wire, etc.).
C. . STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is the Staff recommendation, consisting ofthe City Administrator, Public Works Director
and Street Superintendent, that the City Council authorize the lighting contract with NSP as
outlined in alternative #1. This contract would have an immediate savings of$23,637.94 on
the project itself, and would save hundreds if not thousands of dollars in maintenance costs
over the next 25 years.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
.
Copies of the proposal from NSP, the original bid from R. L. Larson, and the subcontractor
proposal from Granite City Electric, R. L. Larson's electrical subcontractor.
Copy of Acorn fixture.
.
Mil
~
lJff..orthem'States Powe' Company ~
Outtioor Lighting
One Main Street SE, Suite 600
Minneapolis, MN 55414
Telephone (612) 362-2801
April 23, 1999
John Simola
City of Monticello
250 E Broadway
P.O. Box 1147
Monticello, MN 55362
Dear John,
.
Northern States Power is pleased to submit a bid of $60,790 to install a Purchase Option
(Group V) street light system consisting of: 7-15' dark green fluted fiberglass poles with
screw-in bases and 14-150 watt HPS twin high performance acorn light fixtures based on the
plans and specs provided to us. This bid also includes the cost of a single feed point control
cabinet which will allow us to turn on/off all of the units at once, conduit for all the cable
runs and receptacles on each pole for seasonal lighting. Under the purchase Option rate
NSP will install, own and maintain the system for 25 years. The monthly charge for each
light fixture will be $7.65.
I hope this is the information you were looking for. If you have any questions please contact
me or John Olson ( 362-2803). When you are ready to proceed with the project, please let us
know and we will prepare the necessary contracts. We also will want to review the
particular color green that matches, as close as possible, the downtown lighting LUlits. Thank
you for considering NSP for the lighting opportunity.
Sincerely,
e:3 ~ r'J ~ 0\L-
3^,~,F)~~ j\ ~\~ 3c~ -\-~~f
<;.~ \1\(. ~ 'f. "\ ~O\..:S .: \ 0'2.$ ~
)
-"It r ~ 0"8
~o\(;>.L 1O\~\~-
)
~.t[;.l~
Stuart E. Fraser
Principal Lighting Consultant
.
st--\
IL',," -12=99 02: 42P "'WSB St Cloud
=:: A):; 1.1 '';1;J l:lb:~ ~1<H'1.11t.."'.1IT t.Lt.\"."
jll'" ' '
,..", iIo- ..--';7
......;,.~.1~..... -,
IIJO::.~'- ~ifiilt CdY
f4~ "... .'
.F ~ , I" ~.. .
// ...' ~r.::J~.),,,V:; /-fJ..
I i ~,_;"'.J'.::::..~~.I'~..,Jt. _, ,.!,. ,.,r...
--
.
'.......... P'0~3~
. . 0"""
. SO 10th Avenue South I ,..,
Waite l.'rk. Miunesota 56387 ' ~
Tetephomt (~~O) ZSJ.-4034 Fu (.320) l51-"t137
320-252-3100
AUGUST 1 O. 1999
,
'. 4~"
1l'Tl,","','
, ,
illl"
MR. DOUG MOEN
R. l.LARSON"EXCAVATlNG,INC.
2255 ~ 12f" STR~ET SO~EAST
5T. CLOUD. MN S63Q4-9705 '
"
RE: 'SAP 86--675-1"2. MONT(CEU.O CSAH 75
DEAR DOUG,
j~~" if'" ,
. .' .
MR. MICHAEL NIELSON OF WSB & ASSOCIATES HAS REQUESTeO THAT I PROVIDE A
PRICE TO FUR"U~ ANO INSTALL STREET UGHnr~';G AND.AssocIATED EQUIPMENT AS
AN ADDITION TO OUK CONTRACT WORK FOR CsA.H 75 RECONSTRUCTION
PROJECT IN MONllCELLO: WE HERESY PR.OPOSE TO FURNISH AND INSTAll THIS
WORK FOR THE AMOUNt QET AilED BELOW.
I :
.
MATERIAL &.t AX
LABOR. 327 @ $41.49
f'~ItMrr
1 SIt OH & PROFIT
$ 41.865.00
13,941.00 -
, 61.po
8.380.00
.- $ 6<4,247.00
It
i
!
...,. "
THIS PROPOSAL INCLUDES;
, ~I
M
. FURNISH.AND INSTAU sevEN LIGHT POLES WITH LUMINAIRES. POLES TO BE
SHAKESPEARE 'AP2Q-l.4.5FS 11 OS WITH *830-NSP~COI.OR BRACKEr' AND 'TWO
KING .1(' le.1150HPS LUMINAIRES WITH LAMPS. LIGHT BASES ARE NOT
INCLUOED. THEY WERE INCLUDEO IN ORIGINAL CONTRACT PRICE.
. FURNISH AND INSTAll TWO UGHTING SERVICE CABINETS. U"GHTING CABINeTS
TO 8E SlATES aECTRIC TYPE T1 MODIFIED', .
. FURNISH AND INSTALL CONCRETe PADS FOR L1GHTI~G se~vlce CA8INETS.
. FURNISH AND INSTALL UNDERGROUNp SERVICE CONDUIT AND CONDUCTORS
FROM NEW-SERVice CAB!NETS TO UTilITY COMPANY TRANSfORMERS. IT IS
ASSUMED TH,+.,T SAID TRANSFORMERS WILL ee WITHIN TW8'IIfY ~ OF NEW
SERVICE CABtNETS. '
. FURNISH AND INSTALL WtRING BETWEEN UGHlING SERVICE CA&INETS AND
l.IGtotT Po~s- ' WIRING TO CONSIST OF FIVE (5) ONE CONDUcToR # I TYPE
USE/XlP COPPER (THREE WIRES FO~ UGHTlNG CIRCUITS AND TWO WIRES FOR
I~RIG^TION CONTROL 13 OX CIRCUIT) AND ONE {I tONE CONOUCTOR *6 TYPE
USE/Xlfll COPPER GROUND WI~E. CONDUIT IS NOT INCL:UDEO. IT wAs
INCLUDED UNDER ORI~I,NAL CONTRACT. .
ELECl'~CAL CON'I1lACTORS : suPPUES AND SERY.ICE-:...
I
~~
.~
"I~~
.'
5~
Aug-12-99 02:42P *WSB St Cloud
RUG 11 '~ ~b:4~ ~HN11~ L!IY ~~~L.
320-252-3100
P.04
"..:JtQ
2
.
2t
t..........
t!If .
..
I.....,.
j".' .1,
. FURNISH AND INSTAll SIX (6) PVC HANDHOlES WITH COVERS. FOUR
HANDHOlES WERE INCLUDED UNDER THE ORIGINAL CONT~ACT. THE
DRAWINGS SHOW A TOTAL OF fEN (10) HANDHOLES. '
. FURNISH ANO INSTALL A GFl RECEPTACLE At FOlIR lOCATIONS. ONE IN EACH
MEDIAN AREA.. FOR CONNECTION OF IRRIGATION CONTROLlERS. .
RECEPTACLES TO BE CONTROllEO BY A TIME SWITCH IN EACH LIGHTING
. SERVICE CABINET. RECEPTACLES TO BE 'FED ay A %" CONDUIT AND THREE #10
CONDUCTORS FROM A LlGHT eASE IN EACH MEDIAN. ~ THE PURPOSes OF
THtS PROPOSAL IT WAS ASSUMED THAt THE IRRIGATION CONTROt.. BOX WOULD
~E LOC^TeO WITHIN TWENTY FeET OF THE' f'OLE.: ,
. ~Ll.LA80rt.MfSCEU.ANEOIJS MATERIAlS, TAX,Af'JO peRMrT AS REQUIRED.
, ' ,
,.. ft'
i
. ~!-:
<. ...
THlSPROPOSAL DOES NOT .INCLUOE:
. REl.OCAnON OF EXISTING NSP STREET LIGHTS OR "''NY ASSOCIATED WIRING.',
THERE. ARE THReE LOCATIONS ON THE, PLANS SHOWING A RELOCATED NSP
UGHf. I HAVE ASSUMED THAT,THIS WORK IS.TO BE DONE BY NSP.
. ANY UTILITY COMPANY CONNECTlqN OR SERVIC'c CHARGES. THESE TO BE
PAID & Y THE OWNER.
. P AINTtNG OF POW OR SI!RVICE CABINETS.. '
. ANY COSTS FOR OVERTIME LA80R~ IT IS ASSUMED THA.T THE WORK IN
QUESTION CAN BE PERFORMED,DuRING NORMAL WORKING HOURS.
,:
!
, ,
I HAVE ATTACHED A COPY OF MY MATERIAL ANDlA80RTA~EOfF, LA80R COST
SHEET, STATES ElECTRIC QUOTATION AND GRAYBAR ELECTRIC QUOTATION fO~
YOUR REFERENC~. PlEASE FORWARO ,t.,LONG WITH )'O!JR'PROPOSAL TO THE
'OWNER.
WE HOPE 'tHAT THIS PROPoSAL WilL MeeT WITH YOUR APPROVAL IF YOU HA \IE
ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CALL. . '
,.~
<:0 <l..~ I)
6frS2's ( 3 S-~'\;)
~ '\~\D~~ ~9~~
2l' 'CfOS~ 9 'q ~o
f.;rJ 8<:;f:;..c3 . \ ~ e.o
E 2 \ '2..0lQ
I
r
" "'.
I
ENCl: TAKEOFF, 2 PAGES
LABOR COST SHEET
STAlES ELECTRIC QUOTE, 8/10/99
G~AY8AR ELECTRIC QUOTE. 8i10/99 .
COPY: MICHAEL NIElSON, WSB &.. ASSOC.
0-....'
.'" ..'"
.
5~l
'"
II~ D.
~-
6125411700 P. 15/20 @
~ If:J H~ Op~
N"!1 I
i ~~~I
WS8 & ASSOCIATES INC.
APR-21-1999 08:48
."
~
Q ~
-
.
00
ISo ~
ii
...
ll.l j
~ ~
- ~
- "
.. !
- ~
...c a
- :a
N :S
..
~ !
- ~
~ 11
,.;j
.~ - ~
>
ie i
.
11"\
o!'I
;, ~
CI,I
en
~
o
, .,...c
.....
()
QJ
- lZl
~
. .....
~
p
'"tj
(1)
en
o
P..
e
~
to
~
~
r.rJ.
U
s c.'d
l=I ......,
0
00
0)
.~
~
...
0
-oc
~
OJ
U
.-c
d
~ 0
~
~
0
~f ~
.-c
U
1"1
M
..
0
"'"
.-i
Q\
Q\
C1'o
.-i
....
rl
:
c:
l:II
'd
t
I
....
'!j
~
'tI
13
-
."
~(lj
...
....
5~
-- - -.-
.
In
c.-
~~
\~
~
.
:'.,--::.:::.\>~r;,: .
..,... ," . ,.'
.
.
5 1.
.
City Council Agenda - 8/23/99
Consideration to approve a resolution callimz for a public hearing bv the City on the
proposed adoption ofthe modified Redevelopment Plan for Central Monticello
Redevelopment Proiect No. L and the proposed establishment ofTIF District No. 1-26
therein and the adoption ofthe proposed TIF Plan therefor. (O.K.)
A. Reference and Backl!round:
As part of the TIF process, the City Council is asked to call for a public hearing for the
establishment ofTIF District No. 1-26 for Twin City Die Casting, Inc. Late Thursday
afternoon, I heard from Jay Eller that the company has selected Monticello as their
location for construction ofthe Phase 1,40,000 sq ft office/manufacturing facility subject
to necessary development approvals. The target date for a ground breaking is no later
than November 1, 1999. The selected 6-acre site is located on the south side of Chelsea
Road and in the most easterly section of the Monticello Commerce Center, next to the
high school's new road entrance off Chelsea Road.
In the August 9 Council agenda, you received a copy of a letter to Mr. Harmon relating to
the TIF assistance offered to the company based on given assumptions. This stands as
our proposed TIF assistance.
The resolution calls for a public hearing date of Monday, October 25, 1999.
B. Alternative Action:
1. A motion to approve a resolution calling for a public hearing by the City on the
proposed adoption of the modified Redevelopment Plan for Central Monticello
Redevelopment Project No 1, and the proposed establishment ofthe TIF District
No. 1-26 therein and the adoption ofthe proposed TIF Plan therefor.
2. A motion to deny approval of a resolution calling for a public hearing.
3. A motion to table any action.
C. Recommendation:
The City Administrator recommends Alternative No.1.
D. Supporting Data:
Copy of the resolution for approval.
1
.
.
.
P.2/3
RUG 18 '99 11:31RM EHLERS & RSSOCIRTES
CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION CALLING FOa A PUBLIC HEARING BY TIlE CITY ON
THE PROPOSED ADOPTION OF THE MODIFIED REDEVELOPMENT
PLAN FOR CENTRAL MONTICELLO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
NO.1, AND THE PROPOSED ESTASLISHM,ENT OF TAX INCREMENT
FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 1-26 THEREIN AND THE ADOPTION OF
THE PROPOSED TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN THEREFOR.
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (the "Council") for the City of Monticello, Minnesota (the "City"),
as follows:
Section 1. Public Hearing. This Council shall meet on Monday, October 25 , 1999. at
approximately 7:00 pm, to hold a public hearing on the proposed adoption of the Modified Redevelopment
Plan for Central Monticello Redevelopment Project No.1, the proposed establishment of Tax Increment
Financing District No. 1-26, (an economic development district), and the proposed adoption of a Tax
Increment Financing Plan therefor, all pursuant to and accordancewith Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469,001
through 469.047, inclusive, as amended, and Minnesota Statutes, SCI;tions 469.174 through 469.179,
inclusive. as amended, in all effort to encourage the development and redevelopment of certain designated
areas within the City; and
Section 2. Notice of Publ ie HearinSl:. Filin2 of Plans. City staff is authorized and directed to work
with Ehlers and Associates, Inc., to prepare tbe Modified Redevelopment Plan and the Tax Increment
Financing Plan (the "Plans") and to forward documents to the appropriate taxing jurisdictions including
Wright County and Independent School District No. 882. The City Administrator is authorized and directed
LO cause notice of the hearing, together with an appropriate map as required by law, to be published at least
once in the official newspaper of the City not later than 10. nor more than 30, days prior tOOe t"nbPr 7') ,
1999, and to place a copy of the Plans on file in the City Administrator's office at City Hall and to make such
copy available for inspection by the public.
Dated:
Adopted:
Mayor
A n'EST:
City Administrator
1II:\MiMl1)lI\M1)IIU.olloITlFl.26I<ily.a1I...,Wpd
5sC
P.2/2
AUG 20 '99 09:35AM EHLERS & ASSOCIATES
SCHEDULE OF EVENTS
.
MONTICELLO' 1I0USlNG AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
AND THE
MONTICELLO' CITY COUNCIL
FOR THE MO'DIFICATIO'N TO THE REDEVELO'PMENT PLAN FOR THE
" CENTRAL MO'NTICELLO' REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO'. 1
August 23 1999
September 23 ~ 1999
S~ptember 24, 1999
.
October 5, 1999
October 6, 1999
October 6, 1999
October 12, 1999
October 14, 1999
October 14, 1999
Octob~r 25, \ 999
October 25, 1999
.
November 1999
AND THE ESTABLISHMENT OF
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO'. 1-26
(an economic development district)
As of AUl!ust 20. 1999
City Council calls for public hearing on the modification of Central Monticello
Redevelopment Project No.1 and the establishment of Tax. Increment financing District No.
1-26.
Date of publication of hearing notice on business subsidies criteria public hearing by the
BRA (at least 10 days prior to hearing). {Monticello Times puhlic"lion deadline Tuesday
September 21, 1999J
Fiscal/economic implications received by School District and County Board (at least 30
days prior to public hearing). [Sent by September 22. 1999]
Planning Commission reviews Plans to determine if they are in compliance with CitY's
comprehensive plan.
HRA holds public hearing on setting business subsidies criteria.
HRA considers the Plans.
Contirm with the City whether building permitS have been issued on the property to be
included in District No. 1-26.
Date of publication of hearing notice on business subsidies criteria public hearing by the
City Council (at least 10 days prior to hearing). [Momicello Time.'; publication deadline
Tuesday October J2, 1999J
Date of publication of hearing notice and map (at least 10 days but not more than 30 days
prior to hearing). [Monticello Times publication deadline Tuesday October 12" 1999J
City Council holds public hearing On setting business subsidies criteria.
City Council holds public hearing at 7:00 pm on the modification of Central Monticello
Redevelopment Project No.1 and theestablishmentofTax Increment Financing District No.
1-26 and passes resolution approving the Plans. [Council packet information sent by
Oclober 17. 1999]
Ehlers certifies Plans with county and state.
. \ ~.'jk,~~~,~
.srf
.
.
.
City Council Agenda - 8/23/99
7.
Consideration of selecting a developer for further ne2:otiations on the sale and
development of City oroperty at 51h Street and Walnut Street (Former Ferrell Gas site).
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND
As you recall, some weeks ago a request for proposal process was initiated for the purpose
of City sale and development of the Ferrell Gas site. At the previous meeting ofthe City
Council, it became apparent that the City Council is interested in selling the Ferrell Gas site
and allowing development of the property apart from any new or expanded development of
the Liquor Store site. However, development ofthe parking lot for the two sites should be
coordinated. The City received two proposals and now requests that Council direct City
Staff to direct the City Administrator to negotiate with one or the other prospective
developer, or table the matter.
Developer Responses
Attached you will find development proposals from Rod Dragsten and Ken Barthel. Each
proposal included an option for development of the Liquor Store site. Based on Council's
desire to deal only with the Ferrell Gas site, the option provided by the developer for
developing the Liquor Store site is not included in the proposal comparison summarized
below.
Site Design and Layout
The direction provided by the RFP combined with site constraints resulted in two very
similar site plans. In addition, each developer expressed flexibility in meeting
redevelopment plan design guidelines, thus each proposal is essentially equal in terms of site
design and layout. In addition, both plans will need to be modified slightly by reducing the
building site in order to accommodate the wide setback demands by the deep trunk line under
51h Street.
Proposed Uses
The Dragsten proposal is intended to support development of a meat market along with other
uses. The Barthel proposal indicates the potential for a medical clinic. Both will combine
retail and office spaces.
Selling Price
The Dragsten proposal selling price is $215,000. The Barthel price will be based on the
higher of two appraisals to be determined. Based on appraisals already done on the site, it
.
City Council Agenda - 8/23/99
is expected that the formal appraised value under the Barthel proposal will be somewhere
between $250,000 and $300,000.
Please note that as part of the further negotiations, City Staff will be working with the chosen
developer to come up with a parking plan that will compliment the Liquor Store use. Also,
any cost or loss of use to the City resulting from sharing of Liquor Store parking wi 11 need
to be quantified and recovered via a commensurate increase to Ferrell Gas site selling price.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS
1. Motion to direct the City Administrator to negotiate with Rod Dragsten.
2. Motion to direct the City Administrator to negotiate with Ken Barthel.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
.
In terms of price, the Barthel proposal appears superior. In terms of proposed uses, if retail
uses are preferred over office uses, the Dragsten proposal appears superior.
Once a developer is selected, the City Administrator will negotiate specific terms relating to
final price, parking lot joint use, deadlines for performance, site design finalization, etc.
D. SUPPORTING DATA
Proposals
Site plans to be available at the meeting.
.
.
Silver Creek
D eveJopment Ltd. UC
14000 Veit Place. Rogers, MN 55374-9583
Ph. 612/428-3772 · Fax 612/428-8348
.$Ij'_ ~h~~~-A
/JiJ:..'2!!.f1)) - I"'> \~h_
July 13, 1999
Mr. Jeff O'Neill, Deputy Administrator
City of Monticello
Monticello City Hall
250 East Broadway
P. O. Box 1147
Monticello, MN 55362-9245
RE: 6TH AND WALNUT STREET RETAIL SITE
. Silver Creek Development is pleased to present the following proposal to the City
of Monticello for the 6th and Pine Retail Redevelopment. The proposal consists
of two altematives. Option A contemplates the development of Parcell with
Parcel 2 being left in its "as is condition". Option B contemplates the renovation
of the liquor store together with the development of the remaining land in Parcel
2 plus all of Parcel 1.
Dear Mr. O'Neill:
Under Option A, Silver Creek will acquire and develop Parcell as shown on the
plan. Ingress and egress to both parcels will continue to be present at the
current locations of 5-1/2 Street. Silver Creek will improve the half of this street
closest to Parcell after the street is vacated. The City will be responsible for
developing and maintaining the half of this vacated street closest to Parcel 2.
Cross easements for accesS between Parcels 1 and 2 will be required for the
vacated street. An easement in favor of Parcel 1 will be required along the
length of Parcel 2 closest to Highway 25. This easement will extend from the
entrance to Parcel 2 on 6th Street and extend to Parcel 1. This easement will
allow northbound traffic on HighwaY 25 to access Parcel 1 without needing to
travel to Walnut Street.
Under Option B, Silver Creek will acquire all Parcel 1 and that portion of Parcel 2
which is not associated with the liquor store. In addition to the new development
shown on the plans for both parcels, Silver Creek will undertake the
redevelopment of the liquor store at a cost to the City to be determined during the
negotiations of the development agreement. The reconstruction costs and
maintenance for the vacated street will be handled in the same way as under
.
~A
,-
~ .-
~ ......~
.
Mr. Jeff O'Neill
July 13, 1999
Page 2
Option A. Although a specific parking area has been identified for the liquor store in
order to meet its minimum parking requirements, cross easements will be needed for all
parking areas, so that customers of the liquor store or the businesses in the new
development will be able to park anywhere on either parcel.
The RFP identifies certain performance standards which the City expects for this
project. This proposal meets those standards. These are specifically addressed in
Exhibit A, which is attached to this proposal.
Silver Creek expects to enter discussions with the City to complete and execute an
exclusive development agreement with the City within ninety days after it is selected as
the developer for this project. The purchase price for the land under either option will be
determined by an MAl appraisal assuming the site is stable and free from any
environmental contamination. The City will be responsible for any costs which are
needed to correct the site if either condition is not as assumed. Silver Creek will close
on this transaction within six months from the date the development agreement is
executed.
.
This proposal is being made under the assumption that 5-1/2 Street will be vacated.
The vacating of this street is a condition for this proposal to move forward. Silver Creek
also understands that Walnut Street will be reconstructed by the City as part of this
redevelopment project. This proposal contemplates that no special assessments for the
reconstruction of Walnut Street will be made against the property being acquired by
Silver Creek pursuant to this proposal.
Thank you for your consideration of this proposal by Silver Creek Development. We will
be happy to answer any questions or address any additional concerns that the City may
have about this proposal as it is being condered.
since~
1rBarthel
Project Manager
leer
. Attachment (Exhibit A)
'1~
.~~'~..~
: '::>-:-~,
.
.
.
EXHIBIT A
6TH AND WALNUT STREET RETAIL SITE
A. We have reviewed the A New Bridae (Revitalizina Monticello's Downtown and
Riveriront) Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance. The proposal will meet this
requirement. The building, as proposed, will be essentially an all brick building with
accent materials for canopies, roofs or signage.
B. The Building meets the property lines on the north (railroad side) with service
through the front of the businesses. There is a service area along 6th Street for the
liquor store and connected retail. No drive-through business is proposed.
C. A monument sign facing Highway 25 is located on the site plan and the message
board is located along Walnut. Signage along Walnut will be limited and externally
lit.
D. The site plan shows proposed parking for each option. In Option B the site area is
designated to meet the parking requirements of the Liquor Store but it is understood
that this would be shared parking with all businesses on the site. The site
boundaries have been revised to meet the new Walnut Street layout and shows
parking as proposed on Walnut.
E. The design has been prepared to allow views through the site between the existing
Liquor Store and the new building to the north. Building height will be twenty feet or
less in height.
F. A sidewalk aligns with the entrance to the Community Center and the proposed
buildings and along 6th Street. Walks lead through the site to the east, west, north
and south.
G. Light fixtures will be provided as specified.
H. Landscaping areas are delineated on the plan. Islands are indicated as required.
I. Option A represents a proposal that leaves the existing Liquor Store site intact
without modification except for potential parking lot cross easements. Option B
suggests additional development on the Liquor Store site to enhance the quality of
the development, maximize development of a valuable parcel, and integrate the
Liquor Store to the remaining development. With the addition, the Liquor Store will
have 9,000 s.f. of gross building area. This size is shown because it is the practical
maximum area that fits with the remaining development. This can be modified to
any appropriate size, which is desired by the City and after analysis of the existing
building. This proposal assumes the City would maintain ownership of the Liquor
Store building and sufficient site area for parking. Any improvements or
enlargement would be at the option of the City and at the City's cost. The developer
will cooperate with the City to complete the renovation of the Liquor Store as part of
this project including the management of the construction for the City.
J. The proposal contains a general mix of retail and commercial business uses
including a potential medical clinic. The proposal would not include any industrial,
manufacturing or vehicle service businesses.
rT" . .-~#
- J""'" ~ ,- ~
:;?'
.
.
.
PROPOSAL OF THE
FUTURE USE OF THE
GAS AND LIQUOR STORE SITE
MONTICELLO MN. 55362
Building design and materials: In considering the proposed building we wanted to blend the old
with the new. We also felt a name was important that would represent this important area, thus
the Walnut Corners was born. The building will be 90% brick (not including windows) with a
contrast stucco columns that will also have bands of brick. Beginning on the Hwy. 25 side of the
building, the base of the front of the building with have 18" of metal base to protect the building.
Glass will make up much of the front of the building for excellent retail exposure. Above all of
the stores will be canopies which also blend with the central downtown traditional area. The roof
lines vary somewhat to provide a mix of the downtown area architecture as well as the newer
constructed buildings in the neighborhood.. The interior ceiling height will be 10' with sidewalls
being 16'. This will keep the rooftop mechanical equipment out of site. The Walnut street side
of the building, (6000s. f) would originally be constructed as a 1 story building with the
capabilities of adding a 2nd. floor. This side of the building would be used for professional
services to accomodate the Walnut 51. angled parking in front of each office. The interior comer
of the Walnut Comers Mall will have a 2 story area which could either be a large open area for
a single user or for an elevator when a second floor is added.
Yard: The building will comply with the zero setback with all deliveries to the back of the.
building. None of the proposed businesses will be granted drive through access.
Signs: Will comply with all zoning ordinances.
Parking: Parking layout will allow shared parking with the liquor store . Fifth street on the site
plan is vacated per instructions.
'7 b ""'.~
.
.
.
Activities: This is a list of possible uses that would blend well at the Walnut Comers mall. Old
Fashioned Meat Market. small coffee shop, ice cream parlor bakery type restaurant with outdoor
seating. Other possible stores would be a video store, 1 hour photo, liquor store, dry cleaners,
barber and hair salons. The professional building portion could include dentist, accountants,
attorneys, travel agency, realestate office, insurance and other similar type businesses that would
lend itself well to the angle parking on Walnut Street.
Liquor Store: The current liquor store could be expanded to 8,500 s.f. Your request for
proposal wanted to expand the current liquor store however updated and enlarged without having
any interruption of business. Much thought has been given to this, with our proposal it is our
suggestion that the liquor store be moved into the new proposed mall along with other retail
shops. The other shops would blend well together and offer a variety of services in one area. If
the liquor store is not moved, the remodeling costs and retrofitting the current building would
not be cost effective. Those costs many times will be 1 ~ to 2 times the cost. The new store
could be constructed with a change in business location completed in one day. The current liquor
store building could then be redeveloped without business interruption for a new user or users.
The current liquor store would then be improved to the standards of the new strip mall in likeness,
quality and style.
'IE.
"'... .
.
.
.
Price and otTering:
Option #1 The price offering for the block which includes the current liquor store, gas site
vacated 5th St. is; $605,000 subject to survey, soil testing.
~ Option #2 The price offering for the gas site alone to be $215,000.
Option #3 Cost to build out an 8500 S.L liquor store will be approximately $119,000. This
includes walls ceilings, electrical, plumbing, hvac and floor covering. This does not include
coolers and trade fixtures needed to operate the liquor store. The build out costs can be deducted
from the purchase price or paid separately.
Respectfully sub~tted By:
~~~
~:dn:; ~rls~en and Partners
of Walnut Comers
'1 f-~.~
.
.
.
City Council Agenda -08/23/99
8.
Consideration of a reQuest for a review of a Concept Sta!!e Planned Unit Development
and Concept Stage Office/I ndustriallRef!ional Storm Water Pond development for two
parcels totaling approximately 11 acres in size. Applicant: Monticello Villag:e
Apartments.
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND
Based on site plan information presented on 8/3/99, the Planning Commission recommended
approval of the concept stage planned unit development. However, subsequent to Planning
Commission review, the site plan needed to be amended to incorporate a drainage
pond/swale along the northern boundary ofthe site. There is also a deep trunk sanitary sewer
line along the northern boundary that affects the position of one of the apartment buildings.
In avoiding these two facilities, the buildable area was thus reduced which forced the
buildings closer together. City Staffis concerned about approval of the site plan with five
units under these revised site conditions.
The balance of this report is identical to the information presented to the Planning
Commission with the exception that the alternatives and exhibit Z have been modified to
reflect the change in site conditions noted above.
Hagen Companies, Inc. has applied for consideration of a residential Planned Unit
Development and adjacentoffice/industrial use. The submitted concept plans consists of two
parcels totaling approximately 11 acres located west of Minnesota Street, south of Ruff?s
Auto, and east of Elm Street. The first stage of development would include the construction
of the residential PUD and regional storm water pond. Construction of the proposed
officelindustrial building, regional stormwater ponding facilities and extension of 7th Street,
between Minnesota and Elm Streets, would occur as a second stage.
The Comprehensive Plan guides the subject parcels for future commercial uses. Both parcels
are zoned PZ-Mixed Use Zoning District. The purpose of this district is to provide for
transitions between high density residential land uses and low intensity business uses, as well
as an intermixing of the uses as part of a given project. Developments within the PZ-M
District are processed as a planned unit development.
Procedurally, the City should consider the PUD concept plan, making comments and
requirements for the developer's further planning. The review of the concept plan is for the
purpose of identifying issues in the design which would raise concern for the City. A PUD
project is assumed to be a departure from the zoning standards, but with a superior design
and development not likely through the strict application ofthose standards. Therefore, the
ultimate finding which the City must make is that the project design meets the intent of the
PUD ordinance. Following the concept plan review, the developer will need to apply for a
development stage PUD for both parcels.
City Council Agenda -08/23/99
.
7th Street
Access to the residential element ofthe project is proposed from Minnesota Street. The City
has long anticipated that development west of Minnesota Street would necessitate the
extension of 7'h Street west to Elm Street, as guided by the Comprehensive Plan. The
applicant is proposing that this construction would not occur unti I the construction of an
office/industrial building on the western parcel. As part of the residential PUD first phase,
the right-of-way for 7th Street must be dedicated and the development agreement must
contain a provision that waves any objections by the developer to assessments to the A-I
parcel for the construction of 7th Street when the construction occurs.
Parcel A-l, High Density Residential PUD
The eastern parcel, labeled Parcel A-Ion the site plan, is proposed to contain a high density
residential PUD and is approximately 3.4 acres in size, excluding proposed right-of-way.
Consideration of a PUD is necessary because more than one building is proposed for the site.
Five, 12-unit apartment buildings (60 units) are proposed for this site. Multiple family
dwelling structures containing 12 or less dwelling units are a permitted use in the PZ-M
Zoning District. The parcel exceeds minimum lot size and width requirements.
.
Lot Area per Unit, Multiple Family
The development must provide 10,000 square feet of lot area for the first unit, 2,000 square
feet for each additional one bedroom unit, and 3,000 square feet for each additional two
bedroom unit. The applicant has not provided information on the number of bedrooms per
unit; however, it appears that sufficient lot area is provided for the number of units proposed.
The plan must include 500 square feet of usable open space for each dwelling unit, or 30,000
square feet total. The concept plan is compliant with this requirement. The applicant will
need to provide floor plan information to determine ifthere is sufficient lot area for the units
proposed. The subject site may not support the maximum number of units allowed under
these requirements in order to provide required buffer yards and building location.
Buildings
Five principal structures are proposed, each with 12 units. The buildings have a defined
height of 23 feet, measured to the midpoint of the pitched roof. The buildings have lap
siding with aluminum trim and fiberglass shutters. The material and color of the building
siding has not been specified.
.
All of the buildings meet required perimeter setbacks. Regarding internal setbacks, A
general standard is that buildings should be no eloser than one-half the sum of the heights
of the two buildings. In this case, the buildings should be separated by at least 23 feet.
Buildings in the concept plan are spaced only 15 to 18 feet apart. As such, the site plan
should be revised in increase the building separation. As noted earlier in this report, the
buildings were moved even closer together due to encroachment on utilities along the
City Council Agenda -08/23/99
.
northern boundary of the project.
Landscaping
Landscape plans have been provided that do not includc plant types, quantities, or sizes.
This information will be required at the development stage. Multi-residential sites are
required to contain a minimum of one tree per dwelling unit. Additional trees will be
required on the west side of the proposed garages to provide screening for second story
apartments. A buffer yard is required along the western and northwestern boundaries ofthe
site between the existing industrial use (auto salvage yard) and the proposed office/industrial
use.
The buffcr yard establishes increased building setbacks and requires a minimum landscaped
yard consisting of specific amounts of planting materials. Because the abutting residential
and proposed office/industrial use parcels are under joint ownership, the 40 foot landscaped
yard may overlay the property line. However, the applicant must provide an intensively
landscaped yard completely on the subject site to screen the auto salvage yard to thc
northwest.
.
The plan show garages on parcel A-I setback ten feet from the western property line, which
would encroach into the required landscaped yard. The Zoning Ordinance does allow for the
landscaped yard to be reduced if a fence or berm is provided. In that the garage in not an
occupied building, it may be considered similar to a fence for buffering purposes. This is
also supported by the fact that the A-I parcel is being buffered from more intensive uses to
the northwest and west. While the garages provide screening at the ground level, views from
second floor apartments would not be screened. A revised landscaping plan illustrating
bufferyard plantings will be required as part of the development stage review. The
landscaping should be composed primarily of coniferous trees to provide second story
screemng.
Parking
The site plan provides a sufficient number of parking stalls, including 30 garage stalls and
91 open parking stalls. All of the garages are located along the western property boundary,
a distance of approximately 300 feet from the eastern buildings. An alternative layout that
provides garages in closer proximity to all of the buildings would be preferable.
Refuse
While information regarding refuse location and enclosure is not required in a concept plan,
it is an issue that may affect site layout and screening, and should, therefore, be considered
early in the site design process. Refuse information will be required at the development
stage.
.
City Council Agenda -08/23/99
.
Parcel A-2, Office/Industrial/Regional Storm Water Pond
The western parcel is labeled A-2 on the site plan and is proposed to be developed with an
officelindustrial structure and regional storm water pond. The site is approximately 7.4 acres
including proposed rights-of-way. The site plan for parcel A-2 is very conceptual at this
point. No landscaping, building elevations or floor plans have been submitted. All of these
will be required as part of a subsequent development stage application.
The proposed use ofthe building must be clarified. Professional offices are a conditional use
in the PZ-M District, but industrial uses are not allowed. Depending on the specific type of
use, a low intensity industrial use may be accommodated as part ofthe pun. Allowing sueh
a use would be dependent upon compatibility with surrounding uses, traffic generation, etc.
Particular concern would be compatibility with the residential uses proposed on parcel A-I.
.
The developer is proposing to construct a regional storm water pond on parcel A-2 that the
City has identified as being needed in this general area. The pond would be constructed as
part ofthe first phase of the project to City standards with the expectation ofthe developer
receiving financial compensation from the City for the land value, excavation of soil, and
permanent outlet infrastructure for the pond. The developer is proposing to use the
excavated material to raise the elevation of the residential site. The pond would help to
provide a physical separation between the auto salvage yard to the north and the proposed
development.
Brennan Property
A sketch plan should be provided by the developer demonstrating how the parcel south of
the proposed pun could be developed. This parcel is not owned by the applicant and is not
expected to be developed at this time; however, the extension of 7th Street will impact the
developable area of this parcel As such, a sketch plan is necessary illustrate that the property
will continue to have access and development potential with the extension of 7th Street as
proposed.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS
Concept Plan for Parcel A-I, Village Apartments
1.
Motion to recommend approval of the PUD Concept Plan based on a finding that
the proposed plan is consistent with thc intent of the Comprehensive Plan and PZ-
M District, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit Z.
.
Approval with conditions listed under exhibit Z would likely require reducing the
number of buildings from 5 to 4.
City Council Agenda -08/23/99
.
2.
Motion to table item and request the Planning Commission to review the amended
plan prior to City Council consideration.
3. Motion to recommend denial ofthe pun Concept Plan based on a finding that the
proposed land use is inconsistent with the policies of the Comprehensive Plan and
intent of the PZ-M District.
C. ST AFF RECOMMENDATIONS
The proposed concept plan is generally consistent with the provisions ofthe PZ-M Zoning
District and Comprehensive Plan guiding for the site. The density is acceptable in terms of
the City Code, however, there is concern that the buildings are too congested. In addition,
more detailed plans are required for site landscaping to ensure that the proposed residential
use will be compatible with existing and planned uses of the area. Regarding the proposed
office/industrial use, more information is necessary about the proposed use in order to
determine if it will be appropriate in the area. Further, more specific plans regarding
development of this site, including building and landscape plans are necessary. All of these
issues, however, may be evaluated and decided as part of a final development stage review.
.
D.
SUPPORTING DATA
Exhibit A ~ Site Location
Exhibit B - Concept Plan
Exhibit B-1 _ Revised Site Plan developed subsequent to Planning Commission review
Exhibit C ~ Landscape Plan
Exhibit Z - Conditions of Approval
.
JUL-29-1999 13:20
NAC
612 595 9837 P.18
City of Monticello I
o !to lOCO 2000
~ ~
ICAI.& IN
':;\~
~.
.-S~2
R
\II
..
!
,.J
>-
~U
0'1
o
83
If
""'t
,..~..
~-., ....
[
.
----..,.....--
EXHIBIT A
~
/
t I'.
'/k'
':: ;
,?i I
I.<> '
~I
,
/
j'- --. -. - ---. -
I
. I
I
I
.
:/:---.....
. I
JUL-29-1999 13:21
I !- I'
~..__._--""f."."_.__.,,, "
i~~ i 'ot~/;:r +c; i h
~n I !..:.,. "'b (IS
R. ii I "Ii ",', '" : ~ ~
~;::~ t---' i-L----I 60
"c~: l .~. .r" I ~2:
!g= ~I '>".../ I~!> '" I' ..~
It'''' "1 \ ,. I >
~t: i."'''' I ~I . ~
.~ L i f.. ~~1 , :
~~..____....______----J
I ,
NAC
"
~.:-
". P', ','..
. ,
/ '. .;:.
.,
r .
" "":; . I
I
. 1
I
r-
!l
i ~ i ~.~ Cl 1Iii!\ tool
;H ~s SJ !~t !i .
, ; I =:: ~ II! ~
ft" i'
... .J .~~ ;s
~i~.;c ~ " .
'.~^
. ~ a ~..::
~ . a i~ ;;: ..'
'"
~:b f;: ~ ~~ !
~ ",11.
. i 7- ~~ ' ,
1'1 ~.!ill
j~~~3 ~.
..;, , :
. ;. a; I I
~ .i
I HI
~ ;
~ ~
i
.'
. '.
."
'C
-<I!)--
COJIICePT PLAN
'j
. .
u, i
. II:
.... I
~~ I : .
..~. I'
. ;~ i
, .
I
"" .."j,
~ ....
. . IfAG!M eOMPANIU. INC.
11110 ~..OICSOOI IT_tIT Hi.
.....;, . '. . .. _.......... ... ~~.'a
1...11&
I EXHIBIT . '
. :et
PAOPOIeo
RISIP.HTlAI. 110 UNIT
APARTMeNTS
llONTtcR1.Q. ....lilT I
'~. ".....~~~~.
~. -..,
-.
. .... ...ala:::::::'
~ ~
08/20/99 11;38 FAX 6129331153
RLK-KUUSISTO
141 002
/
I
/
/
I w IJ--.~--' ~-_ni S ~,I
~il : ,,:', .. 1>: ~ ~ ! ,I
;:Iiis 1--- ,:~." :-.-----1 ,,~ """ /
U;j.....,/L' .c : Sz:: ~ i
~~ ~~L_n~-J eg /
I I.
...___-1_______.
,
/
I
J.------..-. -..
.
ii i Ii i
I!I'~ ~
;il~li
Illlla
~ I !
~~i IJi
e~lli
I :Ii
hi
! -
i '
I~
:IP~
I.~ ~
iI!~
~I
i~
r
/
/
/
/
~
I
to'
._-----;=.=-...-
~....-~ ..
!
r
!
!
i
!
i
i
i
I
--~-----+---..
!
j
i
i
!
!
r-
!
I
~
]
\l1o~~ CO!ol~'lth~.NC- [ ~ ....:::asa J [-
"'HH~-='" ~ _!JIII-==
)
_J
E1[
~ COIolCIPT PI.IUoI
.
~'thiblt- B-1
1)
\
\
1
..--.--..--.'-.-.--- --.-..-.-
08/20/99 11:39 FAX 6129331153
RLK-KUUSISTO
L
I
I
... ..1...----... ........-......-.....-... u_ ... .
-. - - --
-:~
~-
/1
I
I
I
--.J
1
I
I
1
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
J
I
I
I
:..
-I -
,_... ~__ un... "n.~__..._".,""_...~y__....._"..._.._ ' ~, , ,.
4'
12 UNIT APT.
(TYP. )
60.00
1
w
o
<C
~
<:
"
5
w
c..?
<(
a::::
<(
o
\
L
9
----
-.----.
" ."'T""
. :
... ': ..-
','.' .
...... "
'.--a
: ,,"
.- .
.PROPERlY'
'-EXCLUDI;:D',
\
..J ..'
~
'0:'
:.' . r , . .
, '. I
:' . " ' : "
".
'..
'. .'
c:::l
PROPANE:
TANK
c~J1ibit
--
---- - ~
f. I. :~""'"""''''''6:2~''''''''''~
612 595 9837 P.20
JUL-29-1999 13:21
NAC
.
Hagen Companies
MONTICELLO RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
Minnesota Street
Monticello, Minnesota
Project Narrative
Concept Plan submittal
Submitted July 12, 1999
Introduction
This project narrativc is being submitted on bebalf of Magen Companies for a proposed
residential development in the City ofMonticallo. The proposed lXlncept development. identifies
two parcels which are under the ownership oftbo Hagon Companies and Mr. Hagen's partners.
TIle two parcels hereinafter identified as Parcel A-I and A-2 when combined in acreage total
approximately eleven (11) acres. This concept submittal identifies the applicant's intent of
developing a 60 unit apartment complex on approximately 3.7 acres ofpropeItY identifed as
parcel A-I. The 3.7 acre parcel will have aU of its access and utilities taken from Minnesota
Street. The S building 60 unit apartment complex. will provide sufficient parking and garage
parking to meet the city of Monticello codos.
RLK_Kuusisto, Ltd. is servil18 as survoyor, site planner, engineer and landscape architectural
consultant for this project. RLK.Kuusisto, Ltd. is a planning. design and engineering firm
located in Minnetonka. The firm has extensive experience in working with residential
developers and in designing developments to meet the codes of each city. John Dietrich ASLA .
Brian Sullivan, Mark Scholle and Doug Urhammer are the principal contaCts for this project.
Jeff Allman of Allman Associates is the project architect and will be responsible for the building
design and detail. Each building will be similar in design and sha~ for reference a schematic
building elevation has also been submitted with this concept application.
.
.
ConeDt submittal
The submittal is for concept approval and site plan review of approximately 11 acres of property
located west of Minnesota Street, south of R.uff s Auto. oast of Elm Street and north of 13 acres
currently under the ownership of Mr. Brennan. There arc also twO parcels along Minnesota St.
south of parcel A-I which are not a part of this concept submittal. The subject parcel is vacant
and is currently identified as two separate: tax parcels. For purposes of this report Parcel A.l is
3.7 acres and is proposed to be developed as residential and Parcel A.2 is 7.4 acres and wilt be
developed as a regional stonn water pond and a future office/industrial structure. The concept
,ite plan identifies how the two parcels could ultimately be developed. For di~usssion purposes
the site plan has .hown how tbo right-of-way aad 7th StrOot would be aligned If extendtKi
through the property. 7th Streot's SO' riabt-of.wIY has been centered on the .xistins property
line and is consistent witb the right.of.way shown .." of Minnesota Street. A triangular shape
parcel would be left between the regional pond and Jlh Street which if parked at a ratio of 3 caTS
per 1000 sq. ft. would result in a 30 to 36,000 sq. ft. building. Based upon past actions parcel A.
2 could be guided for an industrial use vs a residential use.
June 1999
RLK-Kuusisto. l.td.
.1 .
NAlUVo.TIVB
CSM - SoumWCSl Tech Center
EXHIBIT C
o
.
.
.
612 595 9837 P.21
JUL-29-1999 13:21
NAC
The initial stage of development will be to construct the regional storm water pond to the city
standards along with the 60 unit apartment complex. No extension of 7lh Street is proposed at
this time. Secondly since the two parcels are separate tax parcels a preliminary plat will not be
necessary to develop the apartment complex or stormwater pond. The City of Monticello has
identified the need for a 14 Acre-ft regional stormwater pond to be constructed in this general
area. As shown on the concept site plan, the pond will a'Ct as a buffer to the indusuialland use of
Ruff s ,uto and the futurl d.voLoprnent within parcels "'.1 and A.2.. The pond will be
conatNcted to the City standards wIth th. Ixpeotation of the d.v.lop4r receiving financ;ill
compensation from the CItY for tb. land value, excavation of loil and pcrmenant oudtt
infrastructure to create tho nec:ossary basin of the pond. The excavated material will allow tho 3.7
acre parcel, A.I to be raised to allow the residential site to drain to the pond. The storm water
drainage from the apartment complex. will be treated for water quality and rate control within the
rcaional pond prior to discharge. Based upon Rlk' s understanding the pond will outlet along the
north side of the apartments toward Minnesota Street. Rlk anticipates the City engineer will
provide detail comments on where and at what rate the pond should be discharging.
The subject property is zoned PZM which is classified as a performance based zoning district.
Apartments are an approved use, however when more than one structure is proposed on a lot of
record, a Condition Use Permit is required. The applicant understands this requirement and fully
intends to submit a complete application for site plan review upon receiving comments on this
concept plan..
pr.ltminarv Sits Phm
TIle site plan of parcel A..I conliats of five buildings specifically designed for twelve apartments
within each building. Each buildings footprint is ..pprox. 10S" by 60'. Sufficient parkin; haa
been provided to allow for 2 vehicle spaces per unit. Along the west property line is a row of
garages, which provide a physica.l separation between the future land use of parcel A-2 and the
residential nature of the apartment development. The buildings are oriented around the central
parking area with all having a minimum of two sides facing an open yard. Tho building design
includes either patios or decks for the units. TIle applicant will provide berms and landscaping to
buffer Minnesota Street from the residenecs. Sidewalks will provide accesS to the parking areas
and provide a direct pedestrian connection to Minnesota street.
Juao1999
RLK-Kuusisw,l.td.
NARRATIVE
CSM - Southwest: Tech Cell=-
_2_
~
612 595 9837 P.22
JUL-29-1999 13:22
NAC
.
I" ",'
"
. i I ~,:
1=1 =
"
'. ... ....
:l " ~
Q I
'A
\' d,
0'
.
,
EXHIBIT L>
1;
JUL-29-1999 13:22
NAC
:'~.~'
.
.
",
.. ..... ,. .... ,,., .
.
612 595 9837 P.23
,,:",,:,+~::~."~'i.
~
r
f ?~
~ (
\..~ 40
"
~
~
~"
..;....r
~,-
. .rl-...,...~
).... .~1-
'. ~
. t, :
, ) ~-,-IV/
t ~
'vi-
......... ....... .,
rlJt . ~.- .
.;:., .... ~~.' ::.~'l
~&_.~T"" :..~~,.'l
'. " . ,Il "f'-". -- -~:'
EXHIBIT E
~
612 595 9837
P.24
NAC
JUL-29-1999 13:23
"
~,
~~
~
'.'
.
j'ii.._l~
~.("', ,I
.'r, " I ~-';T"T:'''r...t'T'''TI-T-''''i'~'lir''''f4f'41 . I '.' . i
.1 ,\'~ -Jl-I.' , :.. 1:. I r.l . I I.' .
l.tl I)~""" _"'-:c"".'":'"':.. 'r",.",;;)" ~ ...~ 'C}-~"-l. ,7:, .
._ .(""':7" /....".,......-" "';'1 .~. j'
'..-1 r~.:~, .." ," .14~ .... .:.~" ....lot......1,......._ _.._.,.,~,t{'... T!::.",,::'~ ':;,! 1
!j '1(.' j ...~_~ ..~.::..:..---...... ~fJ"i\.i ~ .,-.....................o.I,.--..t.,i)t.;.....:.!PI"1. I
; " ':"of';"', ,. ."..... \_.._,"'~' -' .,.." ,.........:=;.,~...._.......t.....'. .....f ,.r.." 11.'1
. .r.... ..~; -0" , . ... . "'''... 'II .
:1. .:, ....:; ',:.' .. .. ~I. .:~ "11 It...~":
I ,J' I ' I . .. . ". ,~' t I
jI" . I; ":. I: ".:; i Ij....:1
.t,'I' ""':'11'141'
'" I' .. '. ' l'
:i ....1; <;.;'~i'l 'l!~.:.~~'/til \. . .
:\ "; ..' . I'
. .....:; . t"-I' I .
.1 .i ~...J .' ,.. _.' r..-.......
, " IJ:::l: '1:-4 r :',~. '. ~h;-! . ..~ '"
, '., I' 4: ~ ~ .," I t ,,~'
I, ! "...... t.",;' ".. .....' . .'
. It1:a.,;;"JI; ,.__~r. , -
.~ ..~ ",,,": ,....~ ",..II/
~''''''.(M'''.' '. .
.!. '~ifJ..'. ~.~)_.." -, _.......~
'n- - ...~.... .....,..--....."1' .
:,. I r ' I :
...-..J,.',,_ ...-'t.. ~.l. .... I. ... ........--fiIIM r.ra. ~I:.IIIP'.
_fIIo..__' .,... ...~..........." ,1.1 .,1 .
. t ' , : ~ ~~:"'fi\,~. " ,
"..<,' ............ jc..t..... \~..!!.:.,,_..~
.'"'" fl.,.\ ,'II" .,;' ~ _' ~ 1
\';:-1 . .// \. ~" ~} :'.... :-..
.' ~:I' J /_::1..... . :t-":j
"..;.:. .~. {.: ,", '.' !~. .".'
\}{.~,. .j iL-..:L
\1 '..::t:..:~, J" '. ..
/' "':.".' f'i"~,,;
...\... ~., ~,;,., '.. -il
_ .I . 'I':~ II
'l.'~_ ":'~'~.'j.lCoj\.-.
~! 1:.- '.I,h)\~~.~, I
" i::"""'"~ ~I I
''':''iTi'''r\'"~-:\ l1,
~:l....tJ"..k..,.~......,,-~.. IJ
:. ~!.i -:""~*F":"'~'" ....
,(~,,".::.~, ~1
" .: ",I. ."1
l;V- \ \. ;e il'4' ._..~. I
.. ____.j -'~. ..: iH.:. ,J1
IF I ~,
1, 17". ri lr-
/. oi. ,'\ !f--d
(i,; ~ ('-;';~"l"~:'\' )J U';i~
I ~ J If,)1 ~~IIIi-CI'II
: '1'\ I" . .... ",.' "J
:,'. \ 1.to..1f" 1-)" r"'1.1
... "'" 4' !,h.. 'I. "...::1
....... '---- .' ... (.I." "
.;'\ .....' ",t: ..".:"\ --v- ' .i1t"~.I' tlpoo-_
":. ~ ,..\/, ~ 1 (~i t.> Iii
._~[~:r.:'ff.:r):].~...~~....:,- !;
I
I
I
'1
I
I
I
:1
I
!
;
I
'1
I
~ . ,
!
i
,
i
. f
I
. f
I
i
J
I
,"
.1
..
.,
I',
1\..
lr'"
.' , .: ~ .
,:.._ Ii .
:~..._~! 1:'
. :;-": j:, ~
d-"''":'~: 7
~ : : I......
;. :V1;....
~I... _..~~.;\.1."\
t!' .1~:~:.\~~
; : "'-j;-
I ' .:, :.:: "-==rr.
:1 I
'~ "
I 'i;
~;_..:::'j
'.i I
': .... ... ~ I
'-:::\ n"
:.! 11
.j ..
I; ":
lie
-1
~
"
. ~l
. h'
"l
;
.
'6
City Council Agenda -08/23/99
.
RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
1 . The applicant submit a development stage application including all plans required by
Section 20-3 [B] of the Zoning Ordinance.
2. The applicant dedicate right-of-way for extension of 7th Street and enter into an
agreement to pay future assessments for construction of said street, subject to revicw
and approval ofthc City Attorney.
3. Building floor plans are provided to demonstrate that there is sufficient lot area based
upon the type of residential units proposed.
4. The site plan for parcel A-I is revised to provide a minimum distance between
buildings equal to one-half the sum of the adjacent building heights. (This may not
be possible without reducing the number of units from 5 to 4).
5
A detailed landscaping plan is provided specifying the type, size and location of all
existing and proposed plantings. The landscape plan shall provide a buffer yard as
required by the Zoning Ordinance on the west and north lot lines of parcel A-I.
(Pond may limit ability to install buffer yard on north side).
.--
6. The site plan of parcel A-I is revised to provide garage space in closer proximity to
the east structures.
7. All exterior refuse locations are identified on a revised site plan for parcel A-I
8. The intended use of parcel A-2 is specified.
9. Grading and drainage plans for the regional stormwater pond are submitted, subject
to review and approval of the City Engineer.
10. A sketch plan illustrating potential development of the small parcel to the south with
extension of 7th street is provided by the applicant.
11. Comments of other City Staff.
EXHIBIT Z
.
tr
.
.
.
City Council Agenda -08/23/99
9.
Tattoo and Body Piercing amendments to the City Code and Zunin!! Ordinance.
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND
At the regular meeting of the Planning Commission on August 3, 1999, thc Planning
Commission reviewed the Planner's report below, conducted a public hearing and acted to
recommend adoption of the proposed amendments based on the findings in this report.
Monticello has been discussing the adoption of regulations for tattoo parlor uses. These uses
create two issues ofpublic concern. The first is a land use matter focused upon appropriate
locations for such uses. The second issue relates to public health and safety concerning the
potential to spread disease. Other communities have addressed these issues through their
zoning and licensing powers. An annotated bibliography of research sources regarding the
content coverage and control of tattoo parlors and body piercing establishments has been
prepared and attached as Exhibit A to this report.
From a zoning perspective, tattoo parlors are considered commercial operations. Based on
previous research, there is a lack of documentation or support for an approach to regulating
these uses as sensitive uses that must be separated from other uses to avoid negative impacts
(i.e. adult uses). Rather, these uses are basic service businesses, much like a barber shop or
beauty parlor, which are appropriate in commercial zoning districts. Not allowing the uses
in the City is also an option. However, this approach may only servc to create
"underground" uses and also forfeits the City's opportunity to closely regulate tattoo parlors
through a licensing requirement in the City Code. Therefore, the intent of protecting the
public health and safety may be better served by a combination of allowing the uses in
specific Zoning Districts and licensing requirements.
In considering the existing Zoning Districts established in the Zoning Ordinance, our office
would recommend making tattoo parlors and body piercing establishments a permitted use
in the B-4 Regional Business District. As a commercial use, body piercing establishments
or tattoo parlors have no unique characteristics that would require a conditional use. The B-4
District is most appropriate for the use given the broad range of uses allowed within the
District and its anticipated trade area potential. These same considerations make including
these uses in more limited neighborhood commercial districts less appropriate, in part due
to potential greater access by minors. A Zoning Ordinance amendment making tattoo parlors
and body piercing establishments a permitted use in the B-4 District has been prepared and
attached as Exhibit B.
The primary concern with tattoo parlors and body piercing establishments is the potential to
spread disease and negatively effect public health and safety. A secondary concern is also
to restrict access to these businesses by minors due to the heath aspects and permanency of
tattoos and/or piercing. The operation of businesses related to these issues are best regulated
.
City Council Agenda -08/23/99
through a City's licensing powers.
An amendment to the City Codc has been prepared (Exhibit C) based upon Minnesota State
Department of Health and Family Service regulations, Minneapolis Division of
Environmental Health, similar regulations of other local communities, as well as the
Association of Professional Piercers. The proposed City Code amendment addresses the
following issues, which cover the public health concerns of tattoo and piercing uses.
1. Training of the operator.
2. Verification of sanitation procedures.
3. Identification of safety precautions and customer screening.
4. Identification of facilities and equipment.
.
The licensing amendment establishes procedures for application, conditions under which the
license application may be denied, violation penalties and general operation conditions and
requirements. Approved licenses would be valid until December 31 st of the year in which
the it was issues. Thus, a new inspection would be required with each application for
renewal. The license provisions will be administered by the City. However, the code does
provide that the City may designate an outside representative or agency for the investigative
duties (i.e., Wright County). As such, the application requires three fees, an application fee,
an investigation fee, which would cover any costs for inspections and an license fee. Staff
is still coordinating the inspection issue with Wright County Public Health Staff.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS
1. Approval
a. Motion to approve an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance allowing body
piercing establishments and tattoo parlors as a permitted use in the B-4
District. Motion based on the findings contained in this report.
b. Motion to approve an amendment to the City Code establishing licensing
requirements for body piercing establishments and tattoo parlors.
2. Motion to deny an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance allowing body piercing
establishments and tattoo parlors as permitted uses in the B-4 District, based upon
a finding that such uses are inconsistent with the purpose of said District.
3. Motion to table action on the proposed amendments to obtain additional information
or allow further discussion.
.
.
City Council Agenda -08/23/99
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
The material is provided for review and discussion. Stafl recommends approval of the
Zoning Ordinance and City Code amendments subject to any further comments of Wright
County Public Health, the Planning Commission or City Council.
D. SUPPORTING DATA
Exhibit A -
Exhibit B -
Exhibit B-1
Exhibit C -
Exhibit Z -
Annotated Bibliography
Zoning Ordinance Amendment - draft
Zoning Map showing B-4 area
City Code Amendment - draft
Conditions of approval
.
.
JUL-30-1999 09:26
NRC
612 595 9837 P.02
,
I
I
7/30/99
DRAFT - DRAFT - DRAFT
ORDINANCE NO.
CITY OF MONTICELLO
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA
AN ORDINANce AMENDING TITLE 3, THE BUSINESS AND LICENSE REGULATIONS
OF MONTICEllO CITY CODE BY ESTABLISHING LICENSE REGULATIONS FOR
TATTOO AND BODY PIERCING BUSINESSES.
THE CITY COUNCil OF THE CITY OF MONTICEllO DOES HEREBY ORDAIN:
Section 1. That the Monticello City Code Title 3 be amended by adding thereto a
new Chapter 14 to read as follows:
3-14-1
3-14-2
3-14-3
3-14-4
3-14-5
3-14-6
3-14-7
3-14-8
3-14-9
3-14-10
3-14-11
3-14-12
3-14-13
3-14-14
3-14-1
CHAPTER 14
TATTOO AND/OR BODY PIERCING ESTABLISHMENTS
Purpose
Definitions
License Required
Application Content~License Application
Application Execution
Application Verification
Fees
Persons Ineligible for License
Locations Ineligible for a License
General License Requirements
Health and Sanitation Requirements
Sanctions for License Violations
Penalty
Severability
PURPOSE: The purpose of this section is to regulate the business of
tattooing and/or body piercing in order to protect the health, safety and
welfare of the general public. The City Council finds that the experience of
other cities indicates that there is a connection between tattooing/body
piercing, and hepatitis and other health problems. The City Council finds
<=1 eXHIBIT C
JUL-30-1999 09:26
3-14-2
NAC
612 595 9837 P.03
that the stringent regulations governing tattooing and bOdy piercing can
minimi;ze the hepatitis and disease risk, and therefore protect the general
health and welfare of the community.
,
DEFINITIONS: The following words and terms, when used in this Chapter,
shall have the following meanings unless the context clearly indicates
otherwise.
BODY PIERCING:
Penetrating or making a hole in or through the
human body to place jewelry or objects of metal
or plastic On any area for cosmetic purposes.
CERTIFICATE OF
INSPECTION:
Written approval from the deSignated City
representative or agency that the tattooing
and/or body piercing establishment has been
inspected and meets all the requirements of the
chapter relating to physical facilities, equipment
and layout for the operation of the
establishment.
CLEAN:
The absence of dirt, grease, rubbish, garbage,
and other offensive, unsightly or extraneous
matter.
,
EMPLOYEE: Any person over eighteen (18) years of age
other than an operator who renders any service
in connedlon with the operation of a tattoo
and/or body piercing establishment and receives
compensation from the operator of the business
or its patrons.
GOOD REPAIR: Free of corrosion, breaks, cracks, chips, pitting,
excessive wear and tear, leaks, Obstructions,
and similar defeds so as to constitute a good
and sound condition.
ISSUING AUTHORITY: The City Administrator or his/her designee.
OPERATOR:
Any individual, firm, company, corporation or
association that owns' or operates an
establishment where tattooing and/or bOdy
I
2
612 595 9837 p.04
JUL-30-1999 09:26
NAC
-
.
I
3~ 14-3
3-144
piercing is performed and any individual who
performs or practices the art of tattooing/body
piercing on another person.
TATIOO, TATTOOING:
Any method of placing designs, letters, scrolls,
figures, symbols or any other market upon,
under or in the skin with ink or any other
substance resulting in the coloration of the skin
by the aid of needles or any other instruments
which puncture any portion of the skin to any
degree.
LICENSE REQUIRED: No person shall operate any establishment where
tattooing and/or body piercing is practices, nor engage In the practice of
tattooing and/or body piercing without being licensed pursuant to this
Chapter. All licenses issued pursuant to this Chapter shall expire on
December 31st of the year in which the license is issued. Renewal of an
expired license shall be administered pursuant to application for a new
license as set forth in this Chapter. A state licensed physician who engages
in the practice of tattooing and/or body piercing shall be exempt from the
license requirement. Jewelry stores and accessory stores that provide
exclusively ear piercing services using piercing guns shall be exempt from
this license requirement.
APPLICATION CONTENT ..LICENSE APPLICATION: Every application for
a license under this Chapter shall be made on a form supplied by the Issuing
Authority and shall request the following information:
(A) If the applicant is a natural person:
1.
The name, place and date of birth, street residence address,
and phone number of the applicant.
2.
Whether the applicant is a citizen of the United States, a
resident alien, or is able to legally be employed in the United
States.
3.
Whether the applicant has ever used or has been known by a
name other than the applicant's name, and jf so, the name or
names used and information concerning dates and places
where used.
3
q
JUL-30-1999 09:26
NAC
612 595 9837 P.05
4.
The name of the business if it is to be conducted under a
designating name, or style other than the name of the
applicant and a certified COpy of the certificate as required by
Minnesota Statutes, Section 333.01.
.
5. The street addresses at Which the applicant has lived during
the preceding five (5) years.
6. The type, name and lacaDon of evary businass or OCCUpation
In Which the applIcant has been engaged during the Preceding
five (5) years, and the name(s) and addresses(S) of the
applicant's employer(s) and partner(s), if any, for the
preceding five (5) years.
7. Whether the applicant has ever been COnvicted of a felony,
er/me, or violation of any ordinance other than a petty
miSdemeanor. If so, the applicant shall furnish information as
to the time, place and offense for Which conVictions were had.
(8) If the applicant is a partnership:
1.
The name(s) and address(es) of all general and limited
partners and all infonnation concarning each general partner
required In sub-part A of this Section.
2. The name(s) of the managing partner(s) and the interest of
each partner in the tattooing establishment
.
3. A true copy of the partnership agreement shall be submitted
with the application. If the partnerShip ;s required to file a
certificate as to a trade name pursuant to Minnesota Statutes,
Section 333.01, a certified copy of SUch certificate shall be
attached to the application.
(C) If the applicant is a COrporation or other business:
1. The name of the corporation or business fanned, and if
incorporated, the state of incorporation.
2. A true COpy of the Certificate of Incorporation. Articles of
incorporation or aSSOciation agreement, and bYlaws shall be
attached to the application.
4
I
612 595 9837 P.06
JUL-30-1999 09:27
NRC
.
I
I
3-14~5
3-14-6
3.
The name of the manager(s), proprietor(s), or other agent(5)
in charge of the business and all information concerning each
manager, proprietor, or agent required in sub-part A of this
section.
(0) For all applicants:
1. Whether the applicant holds a current tattooing and/or body
piercing license from any other governmental unit.
2. Whether the applicant has previously been denied a tattooing
andlor body piercing license from any other govemmental unit.
3. The location of the business premises and the legal
description thereof.
4. Whether all real estate and personal property taxes that are
due and payable for the premises to be licensed have been
paid, and if not paid. the years and amounts that are unpaid.
5.
Whenever the applications for premises either planned or
under construction or undergoing substantial alterations, the
application shall be accompanied by a set of preliminary site
and building plans, if not already on file with the City, showing
the design of the proposed premises to be licensed.
6. Such other information the City Council or the Issuing
Authority may require.
APPLICATION EXeCUTION: All applications for a license under this
Chapter shall be signed and sworn to. If the application is that of a natural
person, it shall be signed and sworn to by such person; if that of a
corporation, by an offer thereof; if that of a partnership, by one of the general
partners; and if that of an unincorporated association, by the manager or
managing officer thereof. Any falsification on a license application shall
result In the denial of a license.
APPLICATION VERIFICATION: All applications shall be referred to the
Issuing Authority for verification and investigation of the facts set forth in the
application, including any necessary criminal background checks to assure
compliance with this Chapter. The application shall be issued or denied by
5
C\
JUL-30-1999 09:27
NAC
612 595 9837 P.07
the Issuing Authority in accordance with Sections 8 and 9 of this Chapter. .
The City Administrator shall issue a tattoo and/or body piercing
establishment permit within thil1y (30) days of receipt of the application,
unless the Administrator finds that:
(A) The COITecllicense fee has not been tendered to the City and, in the
case of a check or bank draft, honored with payment upon
preSentation.
(8) The Operation, as proPOSed by the applicant if pennitted, Would not
CDmpIy with all applicable laws, InclUding, but not limited to, the City's
bUSiness, zoning and health regulations.
(C) The applicant has knOWingly made any false, misleading or frauduient
statement of fact in the application for the permit or in any dOcument
required by the City in connection therewIth.
(D) The applicant has operated a tattoo establiShment and has had a
license denied, revoked or suspended for any of the above cases by
the City or any other sate or local agency within two (2) years prior to
the date of the application.
(E) The applicant if an IndivicfuaJ, or any of the Officers and directors if the ,
applicant is a corporation, or any of the partners, inclUding limited
partners, if the applicant is a partnership, and the manager or other
person Principally n charge of the operation of the business Is not
over the age of twenty--one (21) years.
3"14-7
FEES:
(A) Application Fee:
1. The application fee shall be set by resolution of the City
Council.
2. The license application fee shall be paid in full before the
application for a license shall be accepted. Upon rejection of
any application, the license fee shall be refunded in full to the
applicant except where I'eject;oo is for a willful misstatement in
the license apPlication.
6
I
JUL-30-1999 09:27
.
3.
NAC
612 595 9837 P.08
Separation application fee shall be paid for establishments
providing both tattooing and body piercing services.
(B) Investigation Fee: Art applicant for any license under this Chapter
shall pay the City at the time an original application is submitted, a
nonrefundable fee at a rate set by the City Council resolution to cover
the costs involved in verifying the license application and to cover the
expense of any investigation by the City's designated representative
or agency needed to assure compliance with this Chapter. In the
event an establishment is adding more than one service at a different
time, additional investigation fee shall be paid for investigation
needed to assure compliance with this Chapter.
(e) License Fee:
1. Separate license fees shall be paid for each process of
tattooing and body piercing service. This fee shall be paid
annually with the license expiring on December 31 of the year
in which the license is issued.
,
2. The annual license fee shall be set by City Council resolution.
3-14-8
PERSONS INELIGIBLE FOR LICENSE:
(A) No license under this Chapter shall be issued to an applicant who is
a natural person if such applicant:
I
1.
Is a minor at the time the application is filed.
2.
Has been convicted of any crime directly related to the
occupation licensed as prescribed by Minnesota Statutes,
Section 364.03, Subd. 2, and has not shown competent
evident of sufficient rehabilitation and present fitness to
perform the duties of the licensed occupation as prescribed by
Minnesota Statutes, Section 364.03, Subd. 3.
3.
Is not a citizen of the United States, a resident alien, or does
not have the legal authority to be employed in the United
States.
4.
Is not of good moral character or repute.
7
q
JUL-30-1999 09:27
NFlC
612 595 9837 P.09
(B) No license under this Chapter shall be issued to a partnership if such .
partnership has any general partner or managing partner.
1. Who is a minor at the time the application is filed.
2. Who has been convicted of any crime directly related to the
occupation licensed as prescribed by Minnesota Statutes,
Section 364.03, Subd. 2, and who has not shown competent
evidence of sufficient rehabilitation and present fitness to
perform the duties of the licensed occupation as prescribed by
Minnesota Statutes, Section 364.03, Subd. 3.
3. Who is not a citizen of the United States, a resident alien, or
does not have the legal authority to be employed in the United
States.
4. Is not of good moral character or repute.
(C) No license under this Chapter shall be issued to a corporation or
other organization it such applicant has any manager, proprietor, or
agent in charge of the business to be licensed:
1. Who is a minor at the time the application is filed. ,
2. Who has been convicted of any crime directly related to the
occupation licensed as prescrIbed by MInnesota Statutes,
Section 364.03, Subd. 2, and Who has not shown COmpetent
evidence of sufficient rehabilitation and present fitness to
Perfonn the duties of the licensed OCCUpation as prescribed by
Minnesota Statutes. Section 364.03, Subd. 3.
3. Who is not a citizen of the United States, a resident alien, or
does not have the legal authority to be employed In the United
States.
4. Is not of good moral character or repute.
3-14-9
LOCA TrONS INELIGIBLE FOR A LICENSE; The following locations shall
be ineligible for a license under this Chapter:
8
I
612 595 9BS( r.......
JUL-30-1999 09:28
NAC
-
(A) Taxes Due on Property. No license shall be granted or renewed for
operation on any property on which taxes, assessments, or other
financial claims of the state, county, school district, or City are due,
delinquent, or unpaid. In the event a suit has been commenced
under Minnesota Statutes, Section 278.01 ~278.03, questioning the
amount of validity or taxes, the City council may on application waive
strict compliance with the provision; no waiver may be granted,
however, for taxes or any portion thereof which remain unpaid for a
period exceeding one (1) year after becoming due.
(B) Improper Zoning. No license shall be granted or renewed if the
property is not properly zoned or. does not qualify as a legal non-
conforming use for tattooing and/or body piercing establishments
under Title 10 of this Code.
(C) Premises Licensed for Alcoholic Beverages. No license shall be
granted or renewed if the premises is licensed for the furnishing 01
alcoholic beverages pursuant to Title 3, Chapter 2 of this Code or is
licensed as a sexually-oriented business pursuant to Title 3, Chapter
of this Code.
-
......
.
3~14-10
GENERAL LlCENSE REQUIREMENTS:
(A) Ta\lOOS on Minors. No person shall tattoo any person under the age
of eighteen (18) except in the presence of, and with the written
permission of, the parent or legal guardian of such minor. The
consent must include both the custodial and non-custodial parents,
where applicable.
(B)
Prohibition on License Transfer. The license granted under this
Chapter is for the operator and the premises named on the approved
license application. No transfer of a license shall be permitted from
place-to-place or from person-lo.person without first complying with
the requirements of an original application, except in the case in
which an existing non-corporate licensee is incorporated and
incorporation does not affect the ownership, control, and interest of
the existing licensed establishment.
Hours of Operation. A licensee under this Chapter shall not be open
for business for tattooing and/or body piercing before 7:00 AM nor
after 11 :00 PM.
(C)
I
9
q
~UL-~~-1999 09:28
NAC
612 595 9837 P.ll
(D) licensed Premises. The tattoo and/or body piercing establishment .
license is only effective for the COmpact and contiguous Space
SPecified in the approved license application. Jf the licensed
premises is enlarged, altered. or extended, the licensee shall infonn
the Issuing Aulhority. No person shall engage in the practice of
tattooing at any place other than the place or localion named Or
deScribed in the application and license. A separate room shall be
required for body Piercing and tattooing services. The applicant shall
submit a drawing to scale of the rattoolbody piercing facilities.
(E) Effect of license SUspension or Revocation. No person Shall solicit
businesses or offer to perfonn tattooing services while under license
suspension or reVocation by the City.
(F) Maintenance of Oreler. The licensee shall be responsible for the
conduct of the business being operated and shall at all times maintain
COnditions of order.
(G) Employee Lists. The licensee shall provide to the ISSuing AuthOrity
a list of employees inclUding operators who Perform taIIoo/ng at the
licensed establishment and shall verify that each employee has
receiVed a COpy of Sections 10 and 11 of this Chapter. Each Operator .
shall Submit eVidence of apprenticeship of at least thirty days under
a licensed tattoo artist.
(H) liability Insurance. All licensees shall have al all times a Valid
certificate of insurance IssueQ by an Insurance company licensed to
do bUsiness in the State of Minnesota indicating that the licensee is
currenuy cov&red in the lattao business by a liability insurance POlicy.
Such insurance shall be kept in force during the term of the license
and shall provide for notification 10 the City Prior to tenninating or
cancellation. A certificate of insurance shall be filed with the City.
The minimum limits of coverage for SUch insurance shall be:
1. Each claim, at least two hundred thousand dollars ($200,000).
2. Each group of claims, at least five hundred thousand dollars
($500,000).
3-14-11
HEALTH AND SAN/TA nON REQUIREMENTS: No person shall engage in
the practice Of tattooing and/or bOdy Piercing at any place in the City without
COmplying with the fOllOWing regulations:
10
I
JUL-30-1999 09:28
NAC
612 595 9837 P.12
.
(A) Lavatory Requirement. Every place where tattooing andlor body
piercing is practiced shall be equipped with an adequate and
conveniently located toilet room and hand lavatory for the
accommodation of employees and patrons. The hand lavatory shall
be supplied with hot and cold running water under pressure; shall be
maintained in good repair at all times; and shall be kept in a clean
and sanitary condition. Toilet fixtures and seats shall be of a sanitary
open front design and readily cleanable. Easily cleanable, covered
receptacles shall be provided for waste materials. Every lavatory
facility shall be provided with an adequate supply of hand cleansing
compound and single service sanitary towels or hand drying devices.
(B) Skin Infection. No person having any skin infection or other diseases
of the skin shall be tattooed or body pierced.
.
(C) Sterilization and Disposal of Bio-Hazardous Materials. All needles,
razor blades, sharps or other equipment utilized for penetrating the
skin shall be individually pre-packaged, pre-sterilized and disposable.
No such equipment shall be used on more than one customer. All
bio-hazardous waste shall be disposed of in accordance with law, and
disposal procedures shall be approved by the Issuing Authority.
Sterilizing solutions and methods may be used for the purpose of
sterilizing instruments other than needles, razor blades, sharps or
other equipment utilized for penetrating the skin when such sterilizing
solutions and methods are approved by the Issuing Authorityl
Sterilizing solutions and methods may be used for the purpose of
sterilizing instruments other than needles, razor blades, sharps or
other equipment utilized for penetrating the skin when such sterilizing
solutions and methods are approved by the Issuing Authority, and
Wright County Public Health Department.
(0) Skin Preparation Procedures. The following procedures shall be
used for skin preparation:
1.
Each operator shall wash his or her hands thoroughly with
soap and water and then dry them with a clean towel before
and after each tattoo and/or body piercing. Operators with
skin infections of the hand shall not perform any tattooing
and/or body piercing services.
2.
Whenever it is necessary to save the skin, pre-packaged, pre-
sterilized, disposable, razor blades shall be used.
I
11
C\.
"
JUL-30-1999 09:29
NAC
612 595 9837 P.13
3.
The skin area to be tattooed and/or bOdy pierced shall be
thoroughly cleaned with germicidal soap, rinsed thoroughly
with water, and sterilized with an antiseptic solution approved
by the issuing authority. Only single service towels and Wipes
shall be used in the skin cleaning process.
(E) Operating Furniture. All tables, chairs, furniture, or area on which a
patron receives a tattoo and/or bOdy pierce Shall be covered by single
service disposal paper or clean linens, or in the alternative, the table,
chair or furniture on which the patron receives a tattoo and/or body
pierce shall be impervious to moisture and shall be properly sanitized
after each tattoo and/or body pierce.
(F) Towels. Every operator shall provide single service towels or wipes
for each customer or person and such towels or wipes shall be stored
and disposed of in a manner acceptable to the issuing authority.
(G) Garments of Operator. Every operator shall wear clean, washable
garments when engaged in the practice of tattooing and/or body
piercing. If gannents are contaminated with blood or body fluids,
such garment shall be removed and changed.
(H) Pigments. Pigments used in tattooing shall be sterile and free from
baderia and noxious agents and substances Including mercury. The
pigments used from stock solutions for each customer shall be placed
in a single service receptacle, and such receptacle and remaining
solution shall be discarded after use on each customer in accordance
with procedures approved by the issuing authority.
(I) Jewelry. Jewelry for the other parts of the body shall be made of
implant grade, hlgh.:quallty stainless steel (300 series), solid 14K or
1 BK gold, niobium, titanium, platinum, or a dense, low-porosity plastic
such as monofilament nylon, acrylic, or Lucite. Eat studs or other
jewelry designed for earlobe piercing are not appropriate jewelry for
other body parts. Jewelry shall have no nicks, scratches, or irregular
surfaces which might endanger the tissues.
(J) Minimum Floor Space. There shall not be less than one hundred fifty
(150) square feet of floor space at the place where the practice of
tattooing and/or body piercing is conducted, and said place shall be
so lighted and ventilated as to comply with the standards approved
by the Issuing Authority.
12
.
.
a
JUL-30-1999 09:29
NAC
612 595 9837 P.14
.
I
a
3-14-13
3-14-13
(K) Influence of Alcohol and Drugs. No person shall practice tattooing
and/or body piercing while under the influence of alcoholic beverages
or illicit drugs. No customer shall be tattooed and/or body pierced
while under the influence of alcoholic beverages or illicit drugs.
(L) Written Instructions. The operator shall provide the person tattooed
and/or body pierced with printed instructions on the approved care of
the tattoo and/or body pierce during the healing process.
(M) Living Quarters. No place licensed as a tattoo and/or body piercing
establishment shall be used or occupied as living or sleeping
quarters.
(N) Other. The operator shall comply with any and all other regulations
or conditions of operation determined to be necessary by the Issuing
Authority, Wright County Public Health Department or the State of
Minnesota for the protection of the public health, safety and general
welfare.
SANCTIONS FOR LICENSE VIOLATIONS:
(A) The City Council may revoke the license or suspend the license for
a violation of:
1. Any provision of this Chapter or any other local law governing
the same activity during the license period.
2. Any criminal law during the license period which adversely
affects the ability to honestly, safely. or lawfully conduct a
tattooing and/or body piercing business.
(B) The City Council may, upon ten (10) days written notice to the
operator and following a public hearing, revoke the license or
suspend the license if the licensee submitted false information or
omitted material information in the license process required by this
Chapter.
PENAL TV: A violation of this Chapter shall be a misdemeanor under
Minnesota law.
13
q
JUL-30-1999 09:29
NAC
612 595 9837 P.1S
3~14-14
SEVERABILJTY:lf any section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase of
this Chapter is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not
affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Chapter. The City Council
hereby declares that it would have adopted the Chapter in each section,
subsection, sentence, clause. or phrase thereof, Or phrases be declared
invalid.
Section 2. This Ordinance shall be effective following its passage and publication.
ADOPTED this _ day of
of Monticello.
1999 by the City Council of the City
CITY OF MONTICELLO
By:
Roger Belsaas, Mayor
ATTEST:
By:
Rick WOlfstelJer, Administrator
14
.
.
,
I
.
.
.
City Council Agenda -08/23/99
RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPRO V AL
1. Review and Comment of Wright County Public Health Department and establishment of
inspection procedures.
2. Comments of other City Stair.
C\
EXHIBIT Z
"
;>
2-
~
~~~
I jl
~
~./>.j .ff4t -......
, J.",L~
0<(: ~II ?'c;;( ~
l~cJ · <
II h <S'
(j ~ >~.
rw / i'- R-PUO\\ 5 ~ .
~.\. .r;[rr).... , \;tJ1--- - <1,."
+-I~')'. "" \i\~~. 1\. . . . d" J. ~ --b _ · ~ \
: ~: ..". "~~ ~ . . ~~ c ~ 0
n 1. . \..y/\ --'-- ..!.. I-;'r>- '7' "~"~'
>--< I1(...... :/. \ ~ l;:t "~. ~ tZ P - 1mr~1i\.:~
-I ~ . '.~. . . ,~:tI --;>; <1> e
-< I--'- "".,," . . ~ ~ 1"1-::<. · , ..c ~ ~ s <p, m ~
~ t.~::::~.~: j ":, ~ ---- - ~ '~1~~-
:: ttB:L"/. t:~~~ c ]r.wti~.~ m v~: ~
~ w.:G~"'~;:""" ~*~~-N. ~~
· :q -,>\,. . " 0- - h ~ J
g. ~(,.. ..I.e:- '. /J' lL
I V~.."+ +1+ J J'~ "
1 - ...."
~ 71 OIL. / ..~ . ~ ~. \.'
"-.l..":;) ..;-.~:.... ! _~
.. ~~,
7r- -:-4 ,.:.. _ ,,~
~. . . L. -- -:- ~ ~ 17 ;
~ '&.\-"!-:- r.T1:n C
~ -;, ,j~ :r.-; i (J)
~. -~'..... ~ :p
-~, '.1I K:\r ()
~~; :~ :c
. . t\ '1ft '"'T"I 0
~. ::.~".." 0
~ ..::n.. ~
~. ., ~ r
j7- t:1 . -.-:-f---i- ~
:p~ ~ -:--,--;- ~
:i a:. ~ ~
:.tFl~ : :
lfJ &rr" '. ';-~ "
'I L~-~ _ I .
tRH:r.~~. '. : I~
~ 11,\ \_~,~ ,---,
f
J
OJ
v.>
1-
.,J::lo.l"
('
('
l"
oJ' -
~
,p I
)>
I
C I Y L I M I T5 j !
,J ~
: r 1 ~
~ @] \ :! !n
'~ -~
U1 ______~l. 0'L\1:~r~_Y 1--_
I'-- c::--...... ~. I S~~08~~ . . .\- ~.. >>-/ ~
"~~' ~~ ~\
I/ci~./1 '.q.~~~. ~ ~ I
r.~' ."~"t q
~-p-/.jOJ ','
'i:.;J v.> ~ .
- ). ~'I....--"""
l j&(
,.. N
-< 'J....'. 1 .
,W ~}1 ~ ~",~_ t
~ .rY~ ~l:t
,I ~~ ~t&
....J'I:;,; 7 . if, ~
"'Jlf.,(],g ........ F
l- I '" I'-...,
1""'-- :n.. .~~
~ (l &<.~
, Iifl):~"";-J.
~
~
1&-. ~.~. ~ ... ~
(l '--:Jjl:..- ~
T\ I'. .
iz ~~l
JJ 'C~~
m /~~~.
A ~ .
~
-:;: q ')~
Smibit ) 'U~~
B" 1 /
-
(
-.,J
n
~
-c
(J)
o
.
lfJ
"-
-1/ /
/
JUL-30-1999 09:29
NAC
612 595 9837 P.16
7/29/99
DRAFT - DRAFT - DRAFT - DRAFT
ORDINANCE NO.
CITY OF MONTICEllO
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 10, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF
MONTICELLO CONCERNING BODY PIERCING AND TATTOO PARLOR
REQUIREMENTS AS A PERMITTED USE IN THE B-4, REGIONAL BUSINESS
DISTRICT.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO DOES HEREBY ORDAIN:
Saction 1. Section 2-2 (Definitions) of Title 10 of the Monticello City Code is
amended to add the following definitions:
[BF.1] BODY PIERCING:
Penetrating, or making a hole in or through the human
body to place jewelry or objects of metal or plastic on
any area for cosmetic purpose.
[FJ TATTOO, TATTOOING: Arty method of placing designs, letters, scrolls, figures,
symbols or any other mark upon, under or in the skin
with ink or any other substance resulting in the
coloration of the skin by the aid of needles or any other
instruments which puncture any portion of the skin to
any degree.
Section 2. Section 14-2 (Permitted Uses - 8-4 Zoning District) of Title 10 of the
Monticello City Code is amended to include the following:
[KK] Body Piercing Establishments
ILL] Tattoo Parlors
EXHIBIT B
q
JUL-29-1999 13:16
NAC
612 595 9837 P.02
SOURCES:
Luedtke Gerald, "spaced-Out Zoning"'. This article identifies various issues while
establishing spacing requirements for land uses.
Minnesota Department of Health, Chapter No. 408, Sec. 25 [609.2246] identifies
requirements for tattooing minors.
Minnesota Oepartment of Health, 0lse818 Control Newsletter. This newalett.r is entitled
Update" Ur1iv.r8al pr.ceutlon. for Prevention of Tran.ml..ion of HIV, Hllp.titll S Virus
and Other Bloodbome Pathogens In Health Care Settings".
Long Gayle, Leland Rockman, "Infectious Complications of Tattoos". This review article
discusses various issues of infectious diseases that are transmitted because of tattooing.
Mathews, "MuniCipal Ordinance". Section 39.262 discusses general license requirements
for tattoo establishments.
Department of Health and Family Support. This memorandum lists the revisions that are
expected to be made to the Minneapolis tattoo licensing ordinance. These revisions are
specifically identified by the Minneapolis Division of Environmental Health.
Association of ProfeSiional Piercers, liThe Basic Ten". Identifies minimum basic standards
which responsible piercers must follow to avoid disease transmission to themselves and
their clients.
"The Point" Issue No. 1-5. General articles by APP discussing history, ethics, legislation
Information regarding body piercing Information.
The following are lists of City Codes for license and zoning that were referenced:
Minneapolis, MN Code - Tattooing
Sherburne, MN Code - Tattooing Ordinance
Shakopee, MN Code - Tattooing
New Hope, MN Code - Tattooing License
Lakeville, MN Code - Tattoo and Body Piercing License
Bloomington, MN Code - Tattooing License
Oak Harbor, WA
Ocean City, MD
Port Orange, FL - Regulations for Tattoo Parlors
Jefferson Parish, LA - Spacing Regulations for Tattoo Parlors
EXHIBIT A
q
Council Agenda - 08/23/99
10. Consideration of an offer to purchase a City owned parcel adjacent to newly created
Chelsea Road East between Hil!hway 25/Cedar Street - Dan Mielke. ({2,IIJ,)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
As part of the Highway 25 Project, the City has been responsible for acquiring various pieces of
right~of-way and closing accesses to businesses in conjunction with the establishment of a new Chelsea
Road intersection at I-hghway 25. This new intersection is located just south of the Ultra Lube facility
and is primarily located on the property once owned by the RV Center.
In order 10 create this new intersection, the City acquired not only the RV Center but also acquired from
Warnet Properties tluee additional lots of the existing Commercial Court development at a square footage
price of approximately $3.50/per sq. ft. In addition to this cost, the City has expended additional funds for
engineering, legal and our acquisition consultant's services bringing the total estimated cost per square
foot to approximately $4.00. The way the Chelsea Road location is designed, there will be a remnant
parcel of property amounting to over 12,420 square feet that is not necessarily needed for the Chelsea
Road right-of-way. A map is enclosed that outlines the parcel in question.
Mr. Dan Mielke and his associates are interested in purchasing this property from the City as it abuts the
property they now own or control. The Mielkes feel this property would be beneficial to be attached to
their property to encourage and promote a better development and use of their property in the future.
They feel the size of the property limits the use by the City. As a result, the Mielkes have proposed to
purchase the referenced parcel for $3.00/per sq. f1. totaling $37,260, but with one contingency. There
currently exists a City water line located on the north boundary of this parcel and they are requesting that
the City be required to relocate the water line if necessary when they develop. Our City Engineer has
estimated the cost to relocate the water line at around $30,000. As you can see, the resulting net proceeds
to the City is substantially less than the $37,000 offer if the City has to commit to spending $30,000 or
more to relocate the water line.
As noted in their proposal, the City paid the Mielkes $3.00/per sq. ft. for an easement to provide access on
the north side of their property to the Subway restaurant and also to the Ultra Lube facility. While this
easement does dedicate an area that needs to be used for driveway and traffic movement purposes, they
continue to own the property and can utilize the space within any future design of their property.
As part of the negotiations in acquiring the access closure documents for the Highway 25 Project, the City
agreed to a first right of refusal agreement with the Mielkes regarding this property. In other words,
the Mielkes would have the opportunity to purchase the property if the City received an offer from a third
party. No terms or price was established only agreeing to give them first right of refusal. While I
certainly believe there is merit in attaching this 12,000 sq. ft. parcel to the adjoining property for future
development, I would also suggest that the City should receive fair value for the property it resells.
While there may be limited uses of this prope11y by itself, it is certainly ndT'unbuildable and could be used
for commercial uses that don't require much parking or that may be need drive~through capabilities only
such as photo shop or a drive-through hamburger shop, etc. The offer price of $3.00/sq. f1. may be a
reasonable amount for both parties if the contingency was not attached as part of the sale. If the water line
relocation is necessary for a $3,000,000 to $400,000 development, it would seem appropriate that the
development should pay the cost, not the City. If the proceeds amount to only $11,000 net to the City,
the Council may want to look at advertising property for sale before committing to an offer.
Council Agenda ~ 08/23/99
At this time it appears the parcel can be very beneficial to the adjoining property in allowing the Mielkes
to maximize the use of their existing parcel. If the property value is not consistent with the value of the
adjoining land that should be a decision the developer needs to determine. Parking and other driving lane
uses could be developed over the property and not require the water line to be removed. Again, the City
should look to recover as much of its cost as possible by offering the property for fair value and if the
purchaser needs to realign any utilities, that should be their decision and their cost.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTION:
1. The Council could consider selling the remnant parcel, 12,420 square feet, for the offered
amount of $3 .OO/sq. ft.
Under this option, the Council would simply be agreeing to sell the property at this value
with no contingencies regarding the relocation of utilities.
2. Council could accept the offer as proposed with the contingency agreeing to move the
water line at the City's expense.
Under this option the net proceeds to the City could be less than $7,000 if the water line
is relocated because of their development.
3. The Council could agree to sell the property to the developer provided a $3,000,000 to
$4,000,000 development occurs and agree to locate the water line as necessary with the
purchase price to be determined by using the square foot value of the entire land within
the project when the development occurs.
Under this option, it would allow the developer the ability to design any project knowing
that this property would be available and that the City would be willing to relocate the
water line as necessary with the price being equal to the value of the balance of the project.
This way the City is not getting more than fair value nor is it receiving less than the value
of similar property in the area.
4. The Council could open up the property for sale to the public by advertisement or other
methods.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is the recommendation of the City Administrator that we should attempt to obtain fair value for
any property we resell. I don't think anyone would disagree that it appears to make the most
sense to attach this 12,000 sq. ft. parcel to the adjoining property and that it would likely create
a better development than by itself. The only question that remains is; what is fair value.
Considering the City has paid between $3.50/sq. ft. and $4.00/sq. ft. for this property I don't
believe it would be beneficial to the City to sell it for $3.00/sq. ft. and commit to a possible
$30,000+ expenditure in relocating the water line. If the adjoining property owner is not
interested in simply acquiring the property without any strings attached, the Council may want
to place the property on the market to see what interest there might be from other pmiies or
develop an agreement outlined under Option #3 which appears to satisfy the needs of the
developer in assuring them that they have the property available and also would insure the
City that it received a fair compensation for the property. It would be my recommendation
Council Agenda - 08/23/99
to accept the offer of $3 .OO/sq. 1'1. but without any contingency requirement on the City.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
A copy of the letter and sketch plan of development and sketch of remnant parcel.
r--:-1 i:"r'J
To: City of Monticello
From: Alvin Mielke, Adiwn Marketing
Dan Mielke, Mielke Brothers LLC
Re: Offer to purchase Remnant Parcel
Date: 8/17/99
Weare looking at a 3 to 4 million dollar property development project as illustrated on the enclosed
footprint (attachment 1).
To properly layout this project, we would like to acquire the small irregularly shaped 12,420 sq. ft. remnant
parcel (attachment 2). This small remnant originally designated as a retaining pond was created by the
alignment and construction of Chelsea Rd east off of hwy 25 S.
A Monticello city water line currently runs under the property line between the remnant and our property.
Our offer to purchase the referenced remnant is $37,260.00 ($3.00 per sq. ft.) + one contingency.
In the event any portion of the referenced city water line needs to be moved due to construction of any
structures requiring its movement, the city water line is to be moved by the city at its own expense. The
movement of the water line is to be coordinated with the construction project requiring its movement.
)or offer of$3.00 per sq.fl for the remnant is the same price per sq. ft. the city paid Alvin.,(Adium Marketing)
for the 6,508 sq. ft. of his property needed by the city to satisfy its obligation to provide SUBWAY its new
access.
Acceptance of our offer,
1. provides the city $37,260.00
2. puts the remnant on the tax roles
3. allows for significant property development
4. city does not have to maintain it
\cJ
. ........ ~
~
\0 - .
.,.._...... ..........""'4ICIIII. - _.1~::!1.7
-G"'e.L.~ A "'f>.
..
....~
. .
i . ..
I
.
f'- - - - -.... - - -
I
,
,
r-----L
, 1t Ir .,
~ I
~~__TL_n-1
I
I
,
. .
. ..
1\
.
.
J:8~
r.8~
~.......
~
~
NO. 639 1010:3
\ \\
.
..
.
.
,
/
-- \,~j't;;/0
h~~'~/)/,--."\ -',
. ;/",/ -:.:~/ \
~'" ~~>'
)
,9S:~:- \ ~.:;/_.;:>~/
~G~j~~=-~*,:~~~:~~~ -
~".-. ~ -~-------~
.:_~-'~---- -----~--;:~f20~-- _ -- -- -- -- :;~---
.".' ~.~,<.._- \ \ \
l~n>O'" ,,- \_\-, S i~ '~:\ 1996 ADT 19 ;~ob
~) QT-' \. ~~.~~--~OJ8 ADT 35,720 0
)~, I' , !----.;"'~\ (-\ \
,;' ~ \ \....;;~ ~,/\ ~s:, \ \ \\
\ \<- . "",~, \,'
---I ""'''''''' \\ \
I ___-~..J . \
....~:~\ " .~~......,_~~='" _ _ ___~~'- ~.....,__-=-c--'"'"" ·
r"..
'--'~ .
! ~ '
\
1;..,
Y:~
;J.,'"
'1io
\, .'
4-
.... .';1.,"1
. ---'~"-
@
~:
"
~: ,0,]
I."
,. ~JO' ,'. "",:,"",""-,
c-
oo
,.,.
~,~
,. _~5 m'!f\
.....' ~ !,,'
_.'C._.-, i,__..J '\ '1'.
",', @ \
~"", 32 \
-:;.,"90\ \
'%
'-
....
-:---.-....
i-',Yl
, L-___
t. ~._-
@
=: CLOSED IN 5 YEARS
ZUCTION OR IF SAFETY.
STS.
~
~
~
9?~
~
.
---
"C
~ ,
---
'- ~
--'
.
\
\
\ \
\ \ ~./fl
\ ..-:-'
\_____-.. __ / -~_ I
~ ___--- ~~I.r y
,\PBLITERA~AD ~DtpNg.-fR.l
CUL-.9E"~AC-'Y/.GO~rnON
,_.~O~~~ /10
/"c:~~. /;::;.-.. ' . , '
1 :: 1\: .
AUG. -O2'~9 (J40N) 12: 32
OLSON USSET l WEINGARDEN P. L. L. P
~#-2
TEL:612 925 5879 P.006
1~.'I.\r!fl'3~'i 1.2:~;. :.1244B4D7~ LJIL-SQN DEVEL..O? :!F;RV
,fUL' 3e-\IoJ~ 11 ~ 14 !.ISH ~ 1ol1l~LJl,.1""c:=' ,,......
~;:
f:
PAGE 02
.....-- .-.....
---
,
'. \
... \
It/' ".~.. ~. .-.... \/~\.. :~\ . ..
, ,
. ,
1, (\"
\, . "4,
\.
.. -.... '\\
\ \ .-",
, .~ . I I ,,11I-' " '
'.-..-" ~--' '\
. .
\....... _" .uot\"-' _ .,._.
l _." . _' ...r-
~; , .'11Io-' ~ \ _..
\,',," .... \.. .,.- ,..-
'\ \ ..tit ,'II"
V"
\ I . .-'
\ ,......... \
, .
, ...
\
,
,
,
t,
"-
....
.~.
- --
,
,
,
\
,
~..~ - ...
\
N '
,
I
.
\ .,
\ ' , S
,
'.
I .
, \ N
lIP
..
, '.
l,
, ,
\ .. ,
, J
,
\
.J__... ,
~--
)J7
"
I.
.......lIIi . ...".
. ...;'''~~V
. ....
.-
"-..--
.
(". ) .,.1 i
~ -........,
t
..
~A. ,:z.
,.. ..'
i.~ rI"
\
"
,
~.
. \ ...._1'
;... -'- .7'4". "...~
....
"
,....-..
, S..
to. \,
I "\,
.Iy,./i I.....
"'~
\
'-. :;!J
.....' '-...
.J _..,....:....
I. '
"v.....
('
,..
" . " "'
..
...
...
.. .)~.. .
)
...
'J
.!
" 1 '..i
, ,_) A
... ~"
, ... ~.,
. .,~ 1, !\...
, ~ " I
. ~. i".'"1III l ~I
...~ - -+------~III.
, . .
, ..,. \, 1 O~. 1 9 ,i J )
.1 ~. I, ;'-.....
, ;). !'''' .....,... . ,.'
, ...
" \
, \
... ',,-},-
, , ,
;
__..r. ......... .
_ . .""".~i___.._. ~
'.
......~......-...II'"'IItI.iIIdI......",.-.-........--.~ . ....
+'00
1""- - _.._._...-....._~~..... ~,..
..,.-........ ..__~.....~....... .....--;,1>- ............ -
,
..
,.
/
I of
\ ,..
(!
-..., t~~~~--_.-~-r---~
\ ,
I "" \
\ \ --.-'\ .'
\ I I
\ \ \
\ I I
,
. ..."...~...
IM1 ___.....,.
..... - - ...
.~.
. ,.........
~.. ...,.tw.., . ....... . ,,~
II. T....k llilllway U
.
C1c7 ofMvAUcel1a, M~11oOl&
'''In''"',lI''1t'I4I' At'
\
i
,
t":l
.....
+
en
-
I.l1
~r
_..,_ -oil. III...
ARtA OF 28R IS '2,~20 FT'
........ .-
---
.a..1 La)'o.C
1Ia.
\0
.
.
.
11.
Council Meeting - 8/23/99
Consideration of underground portion of median street 1i2htinl! for T .H. 25
Imorovement Project. (J.S.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
The City Engineer, WSB, has been doing some preliminary design work on a proposed street
lighting project for T.H. 25. City staff felt that if we were going to light this highway it
would be important to get some conduits in place prior to placement of all the concrete and
bituminous on 'I.H. 25. Ron Bray, working with representatives of Design Electric, have put
together a proposal to install electrical conduit from the entrance to the Kjellberg Mobile
Home Park north to Oakwood Drive. The conduit would be placed down the center of the
highway under the median. Fifteen below ground junction boxes would be placed along the
route and, in selected areas, conduit would run east and west from the median to areas
outside the curbing for hookup of electrical power and controls. In a future year, when and
if street lighting were installed, it could then be installed on the median simply by removing
a single concrete panel in the location of the proposed light. The proposed cost for this
underground conduit is $28,110.
Another approach would be to plan for street lighting on the edges of the highway behind the
curb, similar to that lighting which is located on T.H. 25 from the 1-94 bridge to the
Mississippi River. This could be accomplished in the future with very few electrical conduit
crossings oCr.H. 25.
The cost of the complete lighting system for TH. 25 is unknown at this time. It appears that
MNDOT may require lighting levels so that the placement of the poles would be similar to
that on TH.. 25 north ofI-94 if 30' to 40' high poles are used, or even closer iflower poles
are used.
The design advisory team had hoped to be able to use the high performance Acorn lighting
on TH. 25 as well. However, placing these fixtures at the 15' level to achieve the MNDOT
lighting requirements would almost be cost prohibiti ve due to the spacing requirements. The
other cobra head style or shoebox lighting on stainless steel poles is placed 30' to 40' in the
air and casts a much broader light pattern so the spacing could be greater.
It is possible that the high performance Acorn lighting could be used along the pathway
which runs north and south on the east side ofT.H. 25, and placed merely for aesthetics with
spacing similar to that on C.R. 75.
The City may be able to get funding in the future for the TH. 25 lighting system from the
State of Minnesota if we ordered a Street Light Justitication Report and that report showed
a need for the lighting for safety reasons. How much money we could get from the state is
unknown. The cost ofthe tinallighting system is unknown; and, as we have already learned
on T.B. 25, that MNDOT dollars often come with a price unknown to the city.
.
Council Agenda - 08/23/99
B.
ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1.
The first alternative would be to approve Change Order #9 which would order the
installation of conduit along the center line of T.H. 25 under the median so that
median street lighting could be placed in the future. The cost of this would be
$28,110, totally funded by the city.
2.
The second alternative would be not to install the center median conduit, but propose
to install the lighting behind the curbs when and if it is determined it is needed.
C.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is the City staff opinion that should the Council feel that median lighting would be
appropriate for T.H. 25, that the conduit be installed at this time as it would be at a
significantly higher cost to run this conduit in the future. If the Council feels the lighting
behind the curb, similar to that north ofT.H. 25 would be satisfactory, the conduits could be
installed at a later time with the lighting project.
-.
The lighting proposed with the current T.H. 25 project would light all intersections of city
streets, and since the area is somewhat undeveloped at this time, lighting on the highway
may not be needed for some time.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of proposal from WSB for Change Order #9 to the T.H. 25 Project.
.
Ii
tlI+..
. ~:~;:
.
..
AUG-18-1999 16:11
A..
WSS
.....
& Associates, Il1C.
WSB & ASSOCIATES INC.
6125411700 P.01/D1 @
. B.A. Mictelstudz. RE. t'o.......
Brct A. Wdss. P.E. , ""'J.;
Pcter R. Willenbrin~. p. E. :
Donald W. Sterna, RE.
RonM B. 8\'1lY. RE.
350 Westwood Lake Office
6441 Wa:yzata Boulevard
Minneapolis. MN 55426
612-541-4800
FAX 541-1700
August 18, 1999
Mr. John Simola
Public Works Director
City of Monticello
909 Golf Course Road
Monticello, MN S.5362
J;
I
Itl"''' '
I..~. ,..
Re: S. P. 860'-40 (TH25)
C. P. 96-04C
Future Lighting Provisions
Change Order No.9
Dear Mr. Slmola:
The follQwing is the estimated C05t to add lighting conduit along TII 25 as per our discussions on Tuesday,
August 17, 1999. The conduit would provide for future median lighting along TH 25 without having to bore
under the new roadway. The items include conduit and pillboxes from the Kjellberg Mobile Home Pari:; entrance
to Oakwood Drive. The cost to inc:lude these items is as follows:
_."'-~".
Prke./Unit
$2_0.~?~meter .
SS.SOlMeter
$12,920
Total PrIce
i.. !1Y!1
\ 53 mm Rigid Steel Conduit
QuontiJv
150m
$3,000
-~
1520 m
, 50 nun Non-Metallic Conduit
~'_" --,--'-'
Pullboxes
,--- .,~-
+", ."
,,_ '1. i TOTAL - 528110
d:. I~e ~ of these ~~tions to them 25 contract is 100% Ci~'ofMontice1lo. If~pn>vcd by the Ci~ of
!f Monticello, the above items would be added to the existing 1H 25 contra(:t as change order No.9.
11"1 t;'
"-1
I
15
SSOO.OO/eaeh
$7,500
$4,690
20% Contingency
,.......
Sincerely,
WSB & Associates, Inc.
~ray1.E. 4r
Vice President
cc: Jeff O'Neill, City of Monticello
Rick Wolf steller, City ofMontic:eUo
Bre! Weiss, WSB & Associates,lnc.
Leo Otmscheid, WSB &. Associates. Inc.
,.
eiiW
111'''
Minneapolil · St.
In~. Engineers
Clf1ud
Plannen
.. ''ToTAL'' p': -0"i--'
I)" ,,..
\ I
.
12.
.
.
City Council Agenda - 8/23/99
Consideration to review public comments from the North Anchor informational
meetine: and Council direction thereafter. (O.K.)
A. Reference and Backe:round:
At the City Council meeting of July 12, 1999, Council Members heard a presentation by
Dan Frie, HRA representative on the North Anchor Committee. The Council agreed to
the principles as recommended by the North Anchor Committee and directed staff to hold
a public information meeting for the property owners within the designated boundaries of
the North Anchor. Council took no action for soliciting a request for proposal and elected
to consider the Committee's request for an annual appropriation of $200,000 for
acquisition of North Anchor properties as part of the City Budget 2000 process.
A public information meeting was held on August 3 with approximately 19 property
owners in attendance plus committee members and staff. Attached is a copy of a list of
attendees and a summary ofthe meeting and comments or questions raised. Darrin Lahr,
EDA representative on the North Anchor Committee, made the presentation. Lahr and
other North Anchor Committee members did an excellent job responding to comments
and questions. However, the committee members acknowledged they were not the
elected officials of the City. A request was made by a property owner to notify the
property owners in attendance as to the date the Council will hear the public comments.
All property owners in attendance were notified of the August 23 Council meeting.
Based on the comments at the public meeting and given the economics (supply and
demand), it was a gentleman's agreement among committee members present at the public
informational meeting that perhaps a solicitation for a request for proposal in the purple
area may be premature at this time. Economics: Two proposed redevelopment projects
were unable to cash flow: the medical/professional building on the Amoco site and the
retail space on the BBF Property site. Additionally, the City has a request for proposal
out on the Farrell Gas site. One thing that differentiates the purple area from the other
sites is the recommendation for a mixed-use of housing and retail/commercial.
Again, a summary of past North Anchor recommendations and Council direction.
1. North Anchor _ short and long-term principles. Council- By a consensus agreed with
principles.
2. Council direction to hold public information meeting. Public meeting held August 3.
3. North Anchor _ request for an annual appropriation of $200,000 for acquisition of
parcels. Council will consider request as part of Budget Year 2000 process.
1
.
City Council Agenda - 8/23/99
4. North Anchor _ recommended purple area for solicitation of a request for proposal for
a mixed housing and retail/commercial use. Council needs to address this
recommendation of the North Anchor after reviewing comments and questions from the
public information meeting of August 3.
B. Alternative Action:
I. A motion directing staff to prepare a request for proposal for a mixed housing and
retaiVcommercial use as outlined by the North Anchor Committee and subject to
review by DAT and Council prior to solicitation.
rJ
I
2. A motion to delay solicitation and preparation of a request for proposal for a. : 0 ,) c' J'
mixed housing and retail/commercial use as outlined by the North Anchor (<1" () I
Committee.
3. A motion of no interest to solicit a request for proposal for a mixed housing and
retaiVcommercial use as outlined by the North Anchor Committee.
c. Recommendation:
.
The City Administrator recommends alternative no. 2 to delay solicitation and preparation
of a request for proposal at this time based on the supply and demand and given the
solicitation of the Farrell Gas RFP. It is also recommended to bring forth this agenda
item again in six months to one year.
D. SUDDortine Data:
List of attendees and summary and comments from public information meeting.
.
2
\'\ \) co '->., S '"t ~ - \( I.L \, \ ~ t..., ""! '" ~cJ\. Cv i l' eM..
. ~cA~ ~~~
y\ e~ So e- C; ~ ~- ~'^'
~ ~~ ~~~
~ t/c;f!#if ~ (;tf};;?t-J ~;%~O~
? ~-f 31:< ~ - ~~ ~
3 WCtnd"'- tf'c,erhV Sfqff-
'-\ &..vi SuUl}~1 ~~
./~ lknf6u<-
\0 V~Cs~ &&c
~fL~.
1, lHo.' ~ci&uv~r1
~ ff~'9J~
\t ~ 1t/A:#W62
D, 1/ /:
~ tocu.J ~/
/~ '( U--- B~~__
if
3dllJ. .::1~ ~
~i~-- c:;-~ ~7
;P~~/e:ry /dLd~t7SI -S"";--:-
i..\ 7:J)or ltml 5uJ:!1ors ~W /kow1JJru; /to. /}6K 119
. / T&1.5;/ 7iY c-o,e. !
\ vy. -11<0/1" rr~ ~ ') i;V. ICIVE-lL Ii r.
/3 ())~ Q/~vfry-z- 3/5 /~g fd'
.. ~U'"<s ~-
~~- .
\ '2> WW:t 4[1\1A~ ~~
\ L-\ 151 \ \ 'DeY\1 eJles
\Sa~
\ \..0 3 eo 7TVp vCb-- (/l5
\'1\ 8~ 3()~~
\' ~a.~ ~
L~ "Q~"-~ /
~tJ c9U\,~ \~<A'~
?-\
I 1 ~
~'J-
?-3
~
!!'
~s-
-~~~
..Q)BocTl~
13DA
I 0 l>~ t/ 7 f
Po~ 63Qx ~/ S'
/;;33 Sc\'vJy ~vt~
/0 ;J o? I;Z I
E'W1f\. ~
~ \iCt ~
JJ
.
PUBLIC INFORMATIONAL MEETING
RELATING TO NORTH ANCHOR PRINCIPLES
August 3, 1999
SUMMARY: A total of nineteen business and residential property owners attended the public
infonnation meeting. Although the comments listed helow appear somewhat negative, those
comments were made hy the same one or two individuals. Questions of process and comments of
legitimate concerns were voiced. As a whole the residents were most anxious about the
possibility of being kicked-out of their homes and the appearance and safety of their
neighborhood. They appeared to like the long-term concept of green space in the area of Blocks
54,62,63, and 64, and acquisition of parcels as they come on-the-market. Business owners .
raised concerns relating to the economics and demands? Greatest concern: When does the City
plan to go out for a request for proposal in the purple area?
QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS:
I. What type of housing is recommended for the commercial/residential mixed-use area1
Parking is an issue. How will it be handled?
In prior years, the City purchased land for the public parking lot in Block 52 and the
adjoining property owners were assessed. How would this be handled?
2.
.
3. As business owners, do we have to sell to the city? (Pink area)
4. Will Walnut Street he re-opened? Business owners along this strip were previously
assessed for Walnut Street improvements. How would this be handled?
5. Businesses from Broadway north along Walnut Street would he affected hy the
elimination of parking due to necessary grade slope for opening up Walnut Street.
6. Two husinesses recently completed upgrades or improvements, they deserve
compensation.
7. Request for Proposal area: The City owns a small part of the property. Would developer
approach the business or property owners?
8. As a resident, what if I do not want to sell?
9. As residents, we have no defense. City re-zones, buys us out.
Re-zoned to CCD (Commercial-residential).
.
10.
What gives the City ( elected officials) the right?
11. City appears to put up what they want.
/~
.
12.
What's the plans for Blocks 62, 63, and 64?
13. In green area, what probability do we have in finding a buyer?
14. When will RFP go out for purple area?
15. With change of elected officials, council attitudes change. Then what happens to plan?
Where does that leave us?
16. Economics is the driver for commercial. Commercial needs traffic and the exposure. The
further back from traffic, the less viable.
17.
18.
19.
20.
. 21.
22.
.
The City does what it wants.
Example: Carlson property - City will not issue permit to reconstruct garage.
Can't trust City.
What is an RFP and how does it work?
We just want to live in our houses, don't want change.
Are we allowed to make improvements to our property? Can we get a permit? Appears
City supports deterioration of neighborhood.
23. Requested those in attendance be notified when meeting comments are submitted to City
Council.
24. Resident - Would like to see Block 54 and the river front preserved as green space.
25. Resident - It appeared the principles are for long-term planning.
GENTLEMAN'S AGREEMENT OF COMMITTEE PRESENT - It appears solicitation for a
request for proposal in the purple may be premature at this time, given two proposed
redevelopment projects were unable to cash flow: the medical/professional office building on the
Amoco site and the retail space on the BBF Property site. And given, the City has a request for
proposal out on the Farrell Gas site. One thing that differentiate the purple area from the other
sites is the recommendation for a mixed-use of housing and commercial/retail and the present
demand for housing.
Recorded by Ollie Koropchak.
I;),
8RC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
08/19/1999 11:22:50
.
Payments for publication
Report Selection:
Approval Date.. ............. -. -.... 08/23/1999
Payments Through Date. _ . . . . . . . . . . .' 08/19/1999
Cutoff Amount to be Used...........
RUN GROUP... 00819
COMMENT... 8/19 CKS
DATA-JE-ID DATA COMMENT
~--~~-~~------ ------------------------.
D-08191999-014 8/19 CKS
CITY OF MONTICELLO
GL050S-V06.00 COVERPAGE
GL335R
Run Instructions:
Joba Banner Copies Form Printer Hold Space LPI Lines CPI
J 01 N S 6 066 10
.
.
- -- ~ -.- .- --. - ..--
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Payments for publication GL335R-V06.00 PAGE
BRG FINANCIAL SYSTEM
8/19/1 99 9 1 1 : 2 2 : 5 1
.
.
Approved on
8/23/1999 for Payments Through 8/19/1999
Description Amount
Vendor Name
.
A E MICHAELS
AAA STRIPING SERVICE COMPANY
ACS
AFFORDABLE SANITATION
ALBINSON. INC
AUDIO COMMUNICATIONS
8ALTOS/KATHLEEN M.
BELLBOY CORPORATION
8ERNICK'S PEPSI COLA COMPANY
BRAY/MARY
COMMERCIAL ASPHALT COMPANY
COMPUSA
OJ'S MUNICIPAL SUPPLY
DAHLHEIMER DISTRIBUTING CO
DAY DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
DEHMER FIRE PROTECTION
EARL F ANDERSON & ASSOCIATES
EHLERS & ASSOC,INC PUBLICORP
EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINT.INC
FERBER. INC
GLASS HUT/THE
GLEASON PRINTING, INC.
GRIGGS. COOPER & COMPANY
GROSSLEIN BEVERAGE INC.
GROSSNICKLE/THOMAS P
HERMES/GERALD T
HUBERT COMPANY
IDEAL ADVERTISING
JIM HATCH SALES CO
JOHNSON BROS WHOLESALE LIQUOR
KENNEDY & GRAVEN. CHARTERED
KOVICH/PATRICIA KAY
L & STOOL & DESIGN
LAKELAND TRUCK CENTER, INC
MARCO BUSINESS PRODUCTS, INC
MARCO FINANCING
MARTIE'S FARM SERVICE
MEDTOX LABORATORIES
MN DEPART OF NATURAL RESOURCES
MONTICELLO SENIOR CITIZENS CTR
MUELLER/ROBERT J
NORTH AMERICAN WETLAND ENG, PA
NORTHWEST ASSOC CONSULTANTS
OLSON & SONS ELECTRIC, INC.
ONE CALL CONCEPTS. INC.
PATRICK MICHAEL SUPPLY CO
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS CO
PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING
PARKS
STREETS
COMPUTERS
PARKS
PW INSP
CIVIL DEFENSE SET UP
TRAVEL EXPENSE
LIQUOR
LIQUOR STORE
1ST QTR 1999
STREETS
CLASSES
STREETS
LIQUOR STORE
LIQUOR STORE
FIRE
RIVER MILL PARK
GENERAL
FIRE
COMM CENTER
LIQUOR-:-VANDALISM
BLDG DEPT
LIQUOR STORE
LIQUOR STORE
REIMB FOR GLASSES
AUGUST CLEANING
LIQUOR - SHOPPING CARTS
LIQUOR
STREETS
LIQUOR
RIVER MILL
CH-CLEANING
SHADE TREE
STREETS
CH-COUNTER COPIER M/A
CH-COPIER CONTRACT
SHADE TREE
STREETS
DEP REG
CONTRACT
WAG PRTNSHP & HOGLUND 41
WWTP
VILLAGE APTS PLAN
STREET LIGHTING
JULY CALLS
PARKS
LIQUOR
LIQUOR STORE
25.90
6,274.71
2,157.00
500.63
282.40
578.80
75.34
1,108.17
625.85
900.00
54.93
1.860.00
74.54
4,100.95
809.25
112.74
412.93
105.00
283.76
3,300.00
2,294.48
133.13
271.56
4.349.20
71 .00
227.50
763.38
120.00
289.42
591 .25
462.45
450.00
75.00
32.39
600.75
617.27
143.94
138.00
1,041.00
2,833.33
226.00
1,470:00
2.344.88
369.16
140.00
7.88
1,426.55
398.80
- - .-. - - ..-. -
~---~.-'-~---.- ----..--.--.-
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Payments for publication GL335R-V06.00 PAGE
8RC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
8/19/1999 11:22:51
.
.
Approved on
8/23/1999 for Payments Through 8/19/1999
Description Amount
Vendor Name
PIPELINE SUPPLY. INC.
PITNEY BOWES
PREUSSE/JAMES L
PRO AG CROP CONSULTANTS. INC.
R J THOMAS MFG CO. INC
RELIABLE CORPORATION/THE
RELIANT ENERGY
RESERVE ACCOUNT
RIVERFEST COMMITTEE
RON'S GOURMET ICE
ROYAL PRINTING & OFFICE PROD
ROYAL TIRE OF MONTICELLO
SALZWEDEL/PATRICIA A.
SENSUS TECHNOLOGIES. INC
SERVICE SALES CORPORATION
STEVE'S ELK RIVER NURSERY
TAYLOR LAND SURVEYORS INC.
TDS TELECOM
THOM/SHANNON
THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
TOTAL REGISTER SYSTEMS. INC.
U SLINK
UNITED LABORATORIES
VIKING COCA COLA
WARD/DEBRA
WASTE MANAGEMENT. INC
WATER LABORATORIES. INC
WATSON COMPANY, INC/THE
WILSON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
WRIGHT COUNTY HUMAN SERVICES
WRIGHT COUNTY RECORDER
WRIGHT-HENNEPIN COOP ELEC ASSO
Y M C A - NW
ZEP MANUFACTURING COMPANY
ZIEGLER CAT
**
.
WATER
PW
PUBLIC WORKS
CONSULTATION
PARKS
PUBLIC WORKS - SHREDDER
AN SHELTER
CH - POSTAGE FOR MACHINE
LAND 0 LAKES DONATION
LIQUOR STORE
LIQUOR
WATER
AN CONTROL
WATER
LIQUOR
PIONEER PARK
MEADOW OAK
CH
TRAVEL REIMB
LIQUOR STORE
LIOUOR
WEB SITE
STREETS
LIQUOR STORE
REIMB
REFUSE
WATER TEST
LIQUOR STORE
FILING FEE REIMB
HEARTLAND EXPRESS
FEES
FARMS ELECTRICITY
CONTRACT
STREETS
125KW PORTABLE GENERATOR
Final Totals...
- .-.. - --.-- - ..- -
- -. - - - -.'- --
78.61
148.70
270.00
1,075.00
354.63
329.14
9.59
1,000.00
2,500.00
357.02
46.81
372.30
1.227.43
86.06
70.29
127.80
4,480.00
3.063.39
39.14
6,070.30
151.19
243.61
1,210.37
171.41
5.85
3.573.99
20.00
333.24
13.30
63.00
127.00
12.28
625.00
71.48
40.107.45
113.966.60
ORC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
8/19/1999 11:22:51
. TOTAL NUMBER OF RECORDS
.
.
Payments for Publication
CITY OF MONTICELLO
GL335R-V06.00 PAGE
PRINTED
145
------------~-_.~-- ---_.~--
. .
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
08/19/1999 11:22:53
.
FUND RECAP:
Payments for Publication
DISBURSEMENTS
FUND DESCRIPTION
'101
211
213
224
225
226
450
461
464
601
602
609
610
651
------~-~-~~-------------~--
GENERAL FUND
LIBRARY FUND
HRA FUND
SHADE TREE FUND
PARK FUND
COMMUNITY CENTER
96-04C HWY25/MNDOT IMPR
98-03C COMMUNITY CENTER
98-24C BOOSTER PUMP/WW RIDGE
WATER FUND
SEWER FUND
MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND
TRANSPORTATION FUND
RIVERSIDE CEMETERY
32.853.67
343.50
530.80
218.94
8.595.18
75.34
366.30
3.300.00
39.071.66
703.48
2,762.33
24.182.40
63.00
900.00
TOTAL ALL FUNDS
113.966.60
.
BANK RECAP:
DISBURSEMENTS
BANK NAME
--~---~-------------------~-
GENL GENERAL CHECKING
LIQR LIQUOR CHECKING
89.784.20
24.182.40
TOTAL ALL BANKS
113.966.60
.
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
.iO/1999 08:50:19
Schedule of Bills
CITY OF MONTICEllO
Gl050S-V06.00 COVERPAGE
Gl540R
Reoort Selection:
RUN GROUP... 00812 COMMENT... 8/12015B
DATA-JE-lO
DATA COMMENT
-------------- ------------------------
0-08121999-010 8/12 CHECKS
Run Instructions:
Joba Banner Copies Form Printer Hold Space LPI Lines CPI
J 01 N S 6 066 10
.
.
-...--
8RC FINANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF MONTICELLO
08/10/1999 08:50:20 Schedule of Bills GL540R-V06.00 PAGE 1
.OR NAME
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE POll F /P 10 LINE
A E MICHAELS
STREETS 34.37 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 101.43120.2199 45327 010 00139
STREETS 7.09 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 101.43120.2199 45441 010 00140
STREETS 106.40 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 101.43120.2199 46077 010 00141
14 7.86 *VENDOR TOTAL
A M LEONARD INC
RIVER MILL PK IMP 376.27 IMPROVEMENTS 225.45201.5301 015079540001 010 00001
AUDIO COMMUNICATIONS
RADIOS/PARKS 723.29 OTHER EQUIPMENT 225.45201.5801 43743 010 00002
B & J TREE FARMS
TREES/WWTP 658.47 PROF SRV - CONSTRUCTION 436.49201.3025 1095 010 00003
BARTON SAND & GRAVEL CO.
STREETS 130.26 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 101.43120.2199 010 00132
LI BRARY 130.27 BUILDING REPAIR SUPPLIES 211.45501.2230 010 00133
PLAYGROUND IMPR 35.71 IMPROVEMENTS 225.45201.5301 010 00134
296.24 'VENDOR TOTAL
~OY CORPORATION
UOR 549.90 LIQUOR 609.49750.2510 17019900 010 00208
LI QUOR 179.00 LIQUOR 609.49750.2510 17062500 010 00209
728.90 'VENDOR TOTAL
BELLBOY CORPORATION 8AR
TAXABLE 117.00 MISC TAXABLE 609.49750.2540 2083800 010 00210
TAXABLE 575.00 MISC TAXABLE 609.49750.2540 2104500 010 00214
TAXABLE 73.68 MISC TAXABLE 609.49750.2540 2104600 010 00211
TAXABLE 18.50 MISC TAXABLE 609.49750.2540 2104700 010 00212
SUPPLIES 47.52 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 609.49754.2199 30269200 010 00213
831.70 'VENDOR TOTAL
BERNICK'S PEPSI COLA COM
BEER 547.95 BEER 609.49750.2520 39776 010 00222
POP 53.25 MISC TAXABLE 609.49750.2540 39777 010 00221
601.20 *VENDOR TOTAL
BOYER TRUCK PARTS
STREETS 6.03 VEHICLE REPAIR PARTS 101.43120.2211 1423R 010 00142
BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATI
ENG FEESI7TH AVE 154.00 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 462.49201.3199 180690 010 00004
SEWER 1,590.75 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 602.49480.3199 180701 010 00148
1,744.75 'VENDOR TOTAL
~ALO BITUMINOUS, INC.
STREETS 314.38 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 101.43120.2199 9125 010 00005
- --- -- ----- ------
- -. -~--'- -.- ~_.-
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF MONTICELLO
4lIIi0/1999 08,50,20 Schedule of Bills GL540R-V06.00 PAGE 2
DOR NAME
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE POll F/P 10 LINE
CENTRAL LANDSCAPE SUPPLY
RIVER MILL PARK 281.64 IMPROVEMENTS 225.45201.5301 041361 010 00151
CHADER BUSINESS EQUIPMEN
RECORDER/CITY HALL 318.44 OFFICE EOUIPMENT 101.41301.5101 034624 010 00010
CHASKA CHEMICAL CO.. INC
SUPPLI ES/PARKS 15.00 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 225.45201.2199 26282 010 00011
COMMERCIAL ASPHALT COMPA
STREETS 456.33 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 101.43120.2199 010 00129
CUB FOODS - MONTICELLO
RIVERFEST 21.13 IMPROVEMENTS 225.45201.5301 010 00169
CULLIGAN
RENT AL HOUSE 24.92 RENTAL HOUSE EXPENSES 240.49201.4381 010 00153
DAHLHEIMER DISTRIBUTING
CREDIT 9.40CR BEER 609.49150.2520 501111 010 00204
BEER 3.169.25 BEER 609.49150.2520 50586 010 00206
.ABLE 44.00 MISC TAXABLE 609.49150.2540 50581 010 00201
ER 231.45 BEER 609.49150.2520 50821 010 00205
3.435.30 *VENDOR TOTAL
DAY DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
BEER 980.05 BEER 609.49150.2520 61814 010 00228
DONLAR CONSTRUCTION CaMP
PYMT/COMM eTR 151.361.65 PROF SRV - ENGINEERING F 461.49201.3030 010 00012
EARL F ANDERSON & ASSOCI
STREETS 91.02 EQUIPMENT REPAIR PARTS 101.43120.2210 18694 010 00143
ELECTRO MECHANICAL CONTR
LIGHT REPAIR/PARKS 933.50 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 225.45201.2199 6521 010 00014
ELECTRO-MECH SCOREBOARD
PARKS 85.00 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 225.45201.2199 45643 010 00013
EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAIN
REPAIRS/FIRE DEPT 215.31 REPAIR & MTC - VEHICLES 101.42201.4050 2111 010 00015
ENGLE/GREG
TRAVEL REIMB 192.11 USE 225.45201.3310 225.42501.3310 010 00166
~TLINE PLUS FIRE & RE
.PPLIES/FIRE DEPT 18.98 MIse OPERATING SUPPLIES 101.42201.2199 6618 010 00016
---- ---- -. - --- --- -
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF MONTICELLO
411ii0/1999 OR,SO,20 Schedule of Bills GL540R-V06.00 PAGE 3
OOR NAME
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE POll F/P 10 LINE
G & K SERVICES
UNIFORMS/STREET 139.64 MISC OTHER EXPENSE 101.43120.4399 010 00017
SHOP TOWELS 78.60 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 101.43127.2199 010 00018
UNIFORMS/SEWER 80.50 UNIFORM RENTAL 602.49490.4170 010 00019
UNIFORMS/WATER 95.50 UNIFORM RENTAL 601.49440.4170 010 00020
UNIFORMS/PW 44.50 UNIFORM RENTAL 101.43110.4170 010 00021
UNIFORMS/PW ENG 125.25 UNIFORM RENTAL 101.43115.4170 010 00022
UNIFORMS/STREETS 208.25 UNIFORM RENTAL 101.43120.4170 010 00023
UNIFORMS/PARKS 308.00 UNIFORM RENTAL 225.45201.4170 010 00024
RUGS 69.49 REPAIR & MTC - BUILDINGS 609.49754.4010 105145 010 00215
1,149.73 *VENOOR TOTAL
GARTNER'S OFFICE PRODUCT
OFF SUP/CITY HALL 450.68 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES 101.41301.2099 010 00025
GME CONSULTANTS, INC.
COM CTR 2,031.50 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 461.49201.3199 3393 010 00026
GRIGGS, COOPER & COMPANY
WINE 269.62 WINE 609.49750.2530 86431 010 00180
FREIGHT 12.75 FREIGHT 609.49750.3330 86431 010 00181
.OIT 64.85CR LIOUOR 609.49750.2510 86432 010 00176
EDIT 0.74CR FREIGHT 609.49750.3330 86432 010 00177
FREIGHT 45.00 FREIGHT 609.49750.3330 89592 010 00182
LI QUOR 4,370.16 LI QUOR 609.49750.2510 89592 010 00183
TAX 238.41 MISC TAXABLE 609.49750.2540 89592 010 00184
CREDIT 1. 50 FREIGHT 609.49750.3330 89593 010 00178
WINE 86.46 WINE 609.49750.2530 89593 010 00179
WINE 194.95 WINE 609.49750.2530 89594 010 00185
FREIGHT 4.50 FREIGHT 609.49750.3330 89594 010 00186
5,157.76 *VENDOR TOTAL
GROSSLEIN BEVERAGE INC.
BEER 7,489.37 BEER 609.49750.2520 172365 010 00219
BEER 146.25 BEER 609.49750.2520 172494 010 00220
7,635.62 *VENDOR TOTAL
GRUHLKE/DAN
TREE REPLACEMENT 30.00 TREE REPLACEMENT 224.46102.4391 010 00027
HARRY'S AUTO SUPPLY
SEWER SUP 14.35 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 602.49490.2199 010 00118
STREETS 26.27 MISe OPERATING SUPPLIES 101.43120.2199 010 00119
PARKS 12.11 VEHICLE REPAIR PARTS 225.45201.2211 010 00120
STREETS 97.44 VEHICLE REPAIR PARTS 101.43120.2211 010 00121
SHOP 4.99 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 101.43127.2199 010 00122
.~ DEPT 65.66 EQUIPMENT REPAIR PARTS 101.43120.2210 010 00123
1.68 MIse OPERATING SUPPLIES 101.42201.2199 010 00124
222 .50 *VENDOR TOTAL
---,-- -- -----,--- --,---- --, -- --, ---- -. - - -
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF MONTICELLO
~0/1999 08,50,20 Schedule of Bills GL540R-V06.00 PAGE 4
DOR NAME
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE POll F/P 10 LINE
HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT
SUPPLIES/WATER 91.11 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 601.49440.2199 189708 010 00028
SUPPLI ES/WA TER 95.49 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 601.49440.2199 193922 010 00029
WATER 193.48 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS 601.49440.2160 195783 010 00174
WATER 15.00 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS 601.49440.2160 26532 010 00175
395.08 "VENDOR TOTAL
HIGH TECH ROOFING
REPAIR LIBRARY ROOF 889.53 IMPROVEMENTS 211.45501.5301 99525 010 00030
HOGLUND TRANSPORTATION
HEARTLAND BUS PYMT 5,562.46 PROF SVR - HEARTLAND BUS 610.49801.3060 84185 010 00032
HOGLUND/DEAN R.
LEGAL FEES/COMM CTR 506.38 PROF SRV - LEGAL FEES 461.49201.3040 010 00031
IANO/JAN
REIMB/SUPPLIES 13.00 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES 101.41990.2099 010 00158
IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS
LIBRARY COpy MCH MTC 47.52 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS 211.45501.3190 23429026 010 00155
~F MONTICELLO
FIRE OEPT REPAIRS 235.27 MISC REPAIR & MTC SUPPLI 101.42201.2299 4138 010 00126
JOHNSON BROS WHOLESALE L
FREIGHT 117. 30 FREIGHT 609.49750.3330 1006901 010 00196
WINE 2,153.05 WINE 609.49750.2530 1006901 010 00197
LIQUOR 582.75 LIQUOR 609.49750.2510 1006902 010 00189
FREIGHT 5.95 FREIGHT 609.49750.3330 1006902 010 00190
LI QUOR 174.90 LIQUOR 609.49750.2510 1006903 010 00193
TAXABLE 59.98 MISC TAXABLE 609.49750.2540 1006903 010 00194
FREIGHT 4.25 FREIGHT 609.49750.3330 1006903 010 00195
FREIGHT 6.80 FREIGHT 609.49750.3330 1008296 010 00191
LIQUOR 675.69 LIQUOR 609.49750.2510 1008296 010 00192
3,780.67 *VENDOR TOTAL
K MART STORE
PARK SUPPLIES 46.84 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 225.45201.2199 010 00033
KEN ANOERSON TRUCKING
ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES 165.00 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 101.42701.3199 010 00034
KING/JAMES W
LAWN SERVICE/CEMETARY 1.118.25 PROF SRV - LAWN SERVICE 651.49010.3105 3913 010 00009
LAWN SERVICE/FIRE HALL 79.88 PROF SRV - LAWN SERVICE 101.42201.3105 3920 010 00006
4111tN SERVICE/LIBRARY 95.85 PROF SRV - LAWN SERVICE 211.45501.3105 3920 010 00007
WN SERVICE/LIQUOR 127.80 PROF SRV - LAWN SERVICE 609.49754.3105 3920 010 00008
1.421. 78 "VENDOR TOTAL
-..-. - -.- - .--- -
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF MONTICELLO
~0/1999 08,50,20 Schedule of Bills GL540R-V06.00 PAGE 5
DOR NAME
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE POI F/P 10 LINE
KLEINSTEUBER/MICHELLE
TREE REPLACEMENT 30.00 TREE REPLACEMENT 224.46102.4391 010 00036
KOVICH/PATRICIA KAY
REIMB/CLEANING SUP/C HAL 8.52 CLEANING SUPPLIES 101.41940.2110 287 010 00035
L & L ASPHALT, INC.
LIBRARY PARKING LOT 1,495.00 IMPROVEMENTS 211.45501.5301 010 00159
LARSON'S ACE HARDWARE
LIOUOR 76.42 MISC REPAIR & MTC SUPPLI 609.49754.2299 010 00104
LIBRARY 1. 37 BUILDING REPAIR SUPPLIES 211.45501.2230 010 00105
FIRE DEPT 29.02 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 101.42201.2199 010 00106
WATER 60.56 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 601.49440.2199 010 00107
PARKS 409.02 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 225.45201.2199 010 00108
SHOP 32.01 SMALL TOOLS & EQUIPMENT 101.43127.2410 010 00109
SHOP 8.69 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 101.43127.2199 010 00110
PARKS 62.65 BUILDING REPAIR SUPPLIES 225.45201.2230 010 00111
RIVER MILL PK 7.43 IMPROVEMENTS 225.45201.5301 010 00112
PARKS 10.11 SMALL TOOLS & EQUIPMENT 225.45201.2410 010 00113
EAST OAKS MEADOW PARK 12.76 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 225.45201.2199 010 00114
.ERFEST 11.15 IMPROVEMENTS 225.45201. 5301 010 00115
EETS 63.90 EQUIPMENT REPAIR PARTS 101.43120.2210 010 00116
STREETS 60.67 SMALL TOOLS & EQUIPMENT 101.43120.2410 010 00117
845.76 *VENDOR TOTAL
MARTIE'S FARM SERVICE
RIVER MILL PARK IMP 197.27 IMPROVEMENTS 225.45201.5301 388601 010 00041
RIVER MILL PARK IMP 120.60 IMPROVEMENTS 225.45201.5301 388689 010 00048
317.87 *VENDOR TOTAL
MAUS FOODS
C HALL 17 .35 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 101.41940.2199 010 00170
LI BRARY 74.97 CLEANING SUPPLIES 211.45501.2110 010 00171
ECON DEVELOP 5.39 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 101.46501.2199 010 00172
LI BRARY 6.99 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 211.45501.2199 010 00173
104.70 *VENDOR TOTAL
MENARD, INC
RIVER MILL PARK IMPR 2,063.92 IMPROVEMENTS 225.45201.5301 010 00131
MICHELS TRUCKING, INC
FREIGHT CHGS 20.00 FREIGHT 609.49750.3330 734058 010 00049
MN DEPT OF TRADE & ECON
PRINCIPAL/WWTP 246.188.17 BOND PRINCIPAL 358.47001.6010 010 00050
.EREST/WWTP 291,315.81 BOND INTEREST 358.47001.6110 010 00051
537,503.98 *VENDOR TOTAL
----- --,--'-- ---- --.-'- - - - -
_.-.- --- ----..-----.--.--
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF MONTICELLO
~/1999 GS,SG,2G Schedule of Bills GL540R-V06.00 PAGE 6
V OR NAME
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE POt F/P 10 LINE
MONTICELLO PRINTING
BUS TICKETS 441.12 MISC OTHER EXPENSE 610.49801.4399 010 00125
MONTICELLO TIMES
LEGAL PUB 1.026.57 LEGAL NOTICE PUBLICATION 101.41601.3510 010 00037
BLO PERMIT INFOR 130.00 GENERAL PUBLIC INFORMATI 101.42401.3520 010 00038
PUBLIC HEARING NOTICES 268.83 LEGAL NOTICE PUBLICATION 101.41910.3510 010 00039
LIQUOR PUB 108.80 GENERAL PUBLIC INFORMATI 609.49754.3520 010 00040
LIBRARY PUB 101. 97 LEGAL NOTICE PUBLICATION 211.45501.3510 010 00041
ANNUAL FINANCE REPORT 1,391.91 GENERAL PUBLIC INFORMATI 101.41520.3520 010 00042
WALNUT ST PUB 80.93 GENERAL PUBLIC INFORMATI 101.41910.3520 010 00043
HWY 25 PUB 83.00 GENERAL PUBLIC INFORMATI 450.49201.3520 010 00044
WEB SITE FEES 350.00 PROF SVC - WEBSITE/EMAIL 101.41920.3092 010 00045
3.542.01 *VENOOR TOTAL
MONTICELLO VACUUM CENTER
CITY HALL CLEANING SUP 25.05 CLEANING SUPPLIES 101.41940.2110 23808 010 00052
MOON MOTOR SALES, INC.
PARKS 34.27 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 225.45201.2199 4012539 010 00135
PARKS 90.37 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 225.45201. 2199 4013022 010 00136
.R 8.50 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 602.49490.2199 4013697 010 00137
133,14 *VENOOR TOTAL
MTI OISBTRIBUTING CO.
PARK SUPPLIES 93.38 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 225.45201.2199 1292740 010 00046
NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS
PHONE CHG/JOHN M 68.80 TELEPHONE 601.49440.3210 010 00053
OHONE CHG/TOM B 94.86 TELEPHONE 101.43115.3210 010 00054
PHONE CHG/RICH C 71. 96 TELEPHONE 601.49440.3210 010 00055
PHONE CHG/ROGER M 68.80 TELEPHONE 101.43120.3210 010 00056
PHONE CHG/GARY A 68.80 TELEPHONE 101.42401.3210 010 00057
PHONE CHG/FREO P 68.80 TELEPHONE 101.42401.3210 010 00058
442.02 *VENOOR TOTAL
NORTHERN STATES POWER CO
WATER 5.830.61 ELECTRIC 601.49440.3810 0; 0 000,59
SEWER 226.17 ELECTRIC 602.49490.3810 010 00060
PARKING LOTS 75.65 ELECTRIC 101,43140.3810 010 00061
CIVIL DEFENSE 14.27 ELECTRIC 101.42501.3810 010 00062
LI BRARY 611. 70 ELECTRIC 211.45501.3810 010 00063
DEP REG 109.60 ELECTRIC 101.41990.3810 010 00064
LIOUOR STORE 1.504.94 ELECTRIC 609.49154.3810 010 00065
CITY HALL 1.202.78 ELECTRIC 101.41940.3810 010 00066
ANIMAL SHELTER 165.20 ELECTRIC 101.42701.3810 010 00067
eE STATION 343.39 ELECTRIC 101.42201.3810 010 00068
TAL HS/901 MN ST 5.17 RENTAL HOUSE EXPENSES 240.49201.4381 010 00069
SHOP 788.46 ELECTRIC 101.43127.3810 010 00070
PARKS 1.051.88 ELECTRIC 225.45201.3810 010 00071
STREET LITES 6.412.42 ELECTRIC 101.43160.3810 010 00012
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF MONTICELLO
~/1999 08,50,20 Schedule of Bills GL540R-V06.00 PAGE 7
VE DOR NAME
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE POll F/P 10 LINE
NORTHERN STATES POWER CO
18,402.24 *VENDOR TOTAL
NORTHERN TOOL & EQUIPMEN
STREETS 125.65 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 101.43120.2199 010 00168
OHNSTAD/ELMER
MILEAGE REIMB 33.88 TRAVEL EXPENSE 602.49480.3310 010 00073
OLSON & SONS ELECTRIC.
FIRE DEPT MTC 141.49 MISC REPAIR & MTC SUPPLI 101.42201.2299 17687 010 00074
PARK REPLACEMT LITES 27.42 BUILDING REPAIR SUPPLIES 225.45201.2230 3872 010 00075
168.91 *VENDOR TOTAL
PAUSTIS & SONS
WINE 819.40 WINE 609.49750.2530 113731 010 00227
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
FREIGHT 8.50 FREIGHT 609.49750.3330 010 00203
LI QUOR 1,154.67 LI QUOR 609.49750.2510 520373 010 00202
FREIGHT 69.70 FREIGHT 609.49750.3330 520374 010 00200
.~OR 2.293.00 WINE 609.49750.2530 520314 010 00201
107.50 LIQUOR 609.49750,2510 521519 010 00198
FREIGHT 0.85 FREIGHT 609.49750.3330 521519 010 00199
3.634.22 *VENDOR TOTAL
PHOTO I
COMM CTR 52.64 PROF SRV - CONSTRUCTION 461.49201.3025 010 00149
7TH ST 5.32 PROF SRV - CONSTRUCTION 462.49201.3025 010 00150
PW INSP/MEADOW OAK PKS 2.57 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 101.43115.2199 010 00151
MISC/PW INSP 2.57 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 101.43115.2199 010 00152
63.10 *VENDOR TOTAL
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GR
SUNNY FRESH TESTING/WWTP 1,452.00 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 602.49480.3199 59073 010 00160
RELIANCE DATA CORPORATIO
COMPUTER MTC/C HALL 1,643.00 PROF SRV - DATA PROCESSI 101.41920.3090 24405 010 00156
RELIANT ENERGY
LIO STORE 11.95 GAS 609.49754.3830 010 00167
RIVERFEST COMMITTEE
REIMB/RIVERFEST 2,000.00 IMPROVEMENTS 225.45201.5301 010 00161
RIVERPLACE PHYSICIANS
.TS 85.00 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 101.43120.2199 010 00154
RON'S GOURMET ICE
ICE 374.09 MISC TAXABLE 609.49750.2540 44409 010 00229
- - .- ---~- -. ---. - .--- --. .-- - -- --- .--- -.---'--"-- ,,-
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF MONTICELLO
~/1999 n8,Sn,2n Schedule of Bills GL540R-V06.00 PAGE 8
V OR NAME
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE POll F/P 10 LINE
SCHARBER & SONS. INC.
PARKS 196.59 VEHICLE REPAIR PARTS 225.45201. 2211 208363 010 00128
PARKS 71. 20 VEHICLE REPAIR PARTS 225.45201.2211 208744 010 00127
PARKS 70.97 EQUIPMENT REPAIR PARTS 225.45201.2210 210240 010 00144
PARKS 205.51 EQUIPMENT REPAIR PARTS 225.45201.2210 210359 010 00145
PARKS 226.11 VEHICLE REPAIR PARTS 225.45201.2211 210487 010 00147
770.38 *VENDOR TOTAL
SCRUB A DUB CAR WASH CEN
TOKENS/BLD INSP 100.00 REPAIR & MTC - VEHICLES 101.42401.4050 010 00233
SHADDUCK YOUNG & BROWN.
LEGAL FEES/COMM CTR 1,019.72 PROF SRV - LEGAL FEES 461. 49201. 3040 010 00097
ST CLOUD FIRE EQUIPMENT
OEP REG FIRE EXT MTC 76.77 REPAIR & MTC - BUILDINGS 101.41990.4010 113182 010 00076
LIO STORE FIRE EXT MTC 76.77 REPAIR & MTC - BUILDINGS 609.49754.4010 113182 010 00077
WATERT DP/FIRE EXT MTC 76.78 REPAIR & MTC - BUILDINGS 601.49440.4010 113182 010 00078
230.32 *VENDOR TOTAL
ST CROIX RECREATION CO.
4111fR MILL PK IMP 2.477.35 IMPROVEMENTS 225.45201.5301 11323 010 00079
ST. CLOUD RESTAURANT SUP
MISC 200.25 MISC TAXABLE 609.49750.2540 459855 010 00230
SUPPLIES 16.95 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 609.49754.2199 459855 010 00231
217 .20 "VENDOR TOTAL
STREICHER'S
FIRE 9.59 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 101.42201.2199 113841.1 010 00138
THERMOGAS COMPANY
HWY 25 IMPT 1,054.08 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 450.49201.3199 808986 010 00162
THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMP
BEER 6.285.05 BEER 609.49750.2520 168914 010 00218
TAXABLE 78.70 MISC TAXABLE 609.49750.2540 169048 010 00216
BEER 5.098.75 BEER 609.49750.2520 169049 010 00217
11,462.50 *VENDOR TOTAL
TSR WIRELESS - MINNESOTA
PHONE/PATTY S 16.04 TELEPHONE 101.42701.3210 010 00080
PHONE/ JOHN L 12.48 TELEPHONE 101.45201.3210 010 00081
PHONE/ELMER 0 6.85 TELEPHONE 602.49480.3210 010 00082
PHONE/GREG E 12.85 TELEPHONE 225.45201.3210 010 00083
48.22 *VENDOR TOTAL
_INK
PHONE/PARKS 3.03 TELEPHONE 225.45201.3210 010 00084
PHONE/CITY HALL 55.00 TELEPHONE 101.41301.3210 010 00085
PHONE/ANIMAL CONTROL 9.32 TELEPHONE 101.42701.3210 010 00086
---------- - -- ---
-- ..- ----- .--
.-. -- - - _.~_. .- ,,-
- .-. ~._. --
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF MONTICELLO
~/1999 oa,SO,2U Schedule of Bills GL540R-V06.00 PAGE 9
V OOR NAME
OESCRIPTION AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUNO & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE POll F/P 10 LINE
U SLINK
PHONE/WWTP 33.19 TELEPHONE 101.43110.3210 010 00087
PHONE/BLO INSP 16.69 TELEPHONE 101.42401.3210 010 00088
PHONE/OEP REG 2.68 TELEPHONE 101.41990.3210 010 00089
PHONE/COM CTR 12.30 TELEPHONE 226.45122.3210 010 00090
PHONE/LIQUOR STORE 18.01 TELEPHONE 609.49754.3210 010 00091
WEB SlTE/E MAIL 240.66 PROF SVC - WEBSITE/EMAIL 101.41920.3092 010 00092
390.88 *VENOOR TOTAL
US FILTER OISTRIBUTION G
RESALE/WATER METERS 4,194.11 METERS & VALVES FOR RESA 601.49440.2211 5555950 010 00163
USA WASTE SERVICES, INC
GARBAGE CONTRACT PYMT 4,203.03 PROF SRV - REFUSE COLLEC 101.43230.3100 20642 010 00164
VANOERLINOE/ JUOY
COM CTR LEGAL FEES 522.91 PROF SRV - LEGAL FEES 461.49201.3040 010 00093
VIKING COCA COLA
POP /PO BY LIQ 38.61 MISC OTHER EXPENSE 101.41940.4399 2216169 010 00098
SIB CITY HALL/PO IN ERR 38.61CR MISC TAXABLE 609.49150.2540 2216169 010 00101
_/PO BY LIQ 21.21 MISC OTHER EXPENSE 101.41940.4399 2218248 010 00099
CITY HALL/PO IN ERR 21.21CR MISC TAXABLE 609.49750.2540 2218248 010 00102
POP 212.25 MISC TAXABLE 609.49750.2540 2220135 010 00103
POP 105.33 MISC OTHER EXPENSE 101.43110.4399 2220150 010 00146
POP 46.33 MISC OTHER EXPENSE 101.41940.4399 2220340 010 00100
423.91 *VENOOR TOTAL
VIKING COCA-COLA BOTTLIN
POP 224.20 MISC TAXABLE 609.49150.2540 2221066 010 00232
WATER LABORATORIES, INC
WATER 10.00 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 601.49440.3199 99G-560 010 00130
WATER 20.00 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 501.49440.3199 991'1-041 010 OOW
30.00 *VENOOR TOTAL
WATSON COMPANY, INC/THE
MISC 593.65 MISC TAXABLE 609.49750.2540 548236 010 0022
SUPPLIES 136.51 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 609.49154.2199 548236 01 0 002~
SUPPLIES 0.35 FREIGHT 609.49150.3330 548236 010 002;
SUPPLIES 188.65 MISe OPERATING SUPPLIES 609.49154.2199 548316 010 002"
919.22 *VENOOR TOT AL
WINE MERCHANTS, INC
FREIGHT 1.10 FREIGHT 609.49150.3330 20106 010 001
WINE 168.00 WINE 609.49150.2530 20106 010 00
. 169.10 *VENOOR TOTAL
WRIGHT COUNTY AUOITOR-TR
AUGUST SHERI FF PATROL 33.140.33 PROf SRV - LAW ENfORCEME 101.42101.3050 010 OC
- ~ -- - .- - - -
8RC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
1/1999 08:50:20
V OOR NAME
DESCRI PHON
WRIGHT HENNEPIN SECURITY
DEP REG SECURITY PYMT
PARKS DEP SECURITY PYMT
.
.
Schedule of 8ills
AMOUNT
ACCOUNT NAME
FUND & ACCOUNT
19.12 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS 101.41990.3190
15.98 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS 225.45201.3190
35.10 *VENDOR TOTAL
CITY OF MONTICELLO
GL540R-V06.00 PAGE 10
CLAIM INVOICE PO# F/P 10 LINE
010 00095
010 00096
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
~/1999 08:50:23
FUND RECAP:
Schedule of Bills
FUND DESCRIPTION
DISBURSEMENTS
----------------------------
101 GENERAL FUND
211 LIBRARY FUND
224 SHADE TREE FUND
225 PARK FUND
226 COMMUNITY CENTER
240 CAPITAL PROJECT REVOLVING FD
358 WWTP NOTE
436 93-14C WWTP EXPANSION PRJ
450 96-04C HWY25/MNDOT IMPR
461 98-03C COMMUNITY CENTER
462 98-12C 7TH STREET EXTENSION
601 WATER FUND
602 SEWER FUND
609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND
610 TRANSPORTATION FUND
651 RIVERSIDE CEMETERY
56.559.31
3.515.17
60.00
12.575.68
12.30
30.09
537.503.98
658.47
1.137.08
755.494.80
159.32
11.424.00
3.413.00
43.198.28
6.003.58
1.118.25
TOTAL ALL FUNDS
.
1.432.863.31
BANK RECAP:
BANK NAME
DISBURSEMENTS
----------------------------
GENL GENERAL CHECKING
LIOR LIQUOR CHECKING
1.389.665.03
43.198.28
TOTAL ALL BANKS
1.432,863.31
THE PRECEDING LIST OF BILLS PAYABLE WAS REVIEWED AND APPROVED FOR PAYMENT.
DATE ............
APPROVED BY
...................... .............
.......... .......................
. ~ .. .. .. .. . .. .. . . . .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. . . .. . . . . . .. . .. .. .
.
CITY OF MONTICELLO
GL060S-V06.00 RECAPPAGE
GL540R
aRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
OB/19/1999 11:23:12
.
Schedule of Bills
CITY OF MONTICELLC
GL050S-V06.00 COVERPAGE
GL540R
Report Selection;
RUN GROUP... 00819 COMMENT... B/19 CKS
DATA-JE-lD
DATA COMMENT
-------------- _...... ----------------------
0-08191999-014 8/19 CKS
Run Instructions:
Jobq Banner Copies Form Printer Hold Sp~ce LPl Lines CPI
J 01 Y S 6 066 10
.
.
eRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM . CITY OF MONTICELLC
08/19/1999 11 :23: 13 Schedule of Bills GL540R-V06.00 PAGE 1
.NOOR NAME
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE POI F/P 10 LINE
A E MICHAELS
PARKS 25.90 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 225.45201.2199 46545 014 00036
AAA STRIPING SERVICE COM
STREETS 6.274.71 STREET MAINTENANCE MATER 101.43120.2240 0092075-IN , 014 00034
ACS
COMPUTERS 2.157.00 PROF SRV - DATA PROCESSI 101.41920.3090 1221673 RI 014 00035
AFFORDABLE SANITATION
PARKS 500.63 MISC OTHER-EXPENSE 225.45201.4399 990834 014 00038
ALBINSON, INC
PH INSP 282.40 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 101.43115.2199 816736 014 00037
AUDIO COMMUNICATIONS
BLDG DEPT 53.58 REPAIR & MTC - MACH & EQ 101.42401.4044 44316 014 00039
CIVIL DEFENSE SET UP 525.22 OTHER EQUIPMENT 101.42501.5801 44405 014 00040
578.80 "'VENDOR TOTAL
BALTOS/KATHLEEN M.
TRAVEL EXPENSE 75.34 TRAVEL EXPENSE 226.45122.3310 014 00041
~LLBOY CORPORATION
LIQUOR 479.85 LIQUOR 609.49750.2510 16796300 014 00032
LIQUOR 628.32 LIQUOR 609.49750.2510 17062600 014 00031
1,108.17 *VENDOR TOTAL
BERNICK'S PEPSI COLA COM
LIQUOR STORE 345.55 BEER 609.49750.2520 43379 014 00015
LIOUOR STORE 106.70 MISC TAXABLE 609.49750.2540 43380 014 00016
LIQUOR STORE 173.60 BEER 609.49750.2520 74947 014 00014
625.85 *VENDOR TOTAL
BRAY/MARY
1ST OTR 1999 900.00 PROF SRV - CUSTODIAL/CAR 651.49010.3110 014 00042
COMMERCIAL ASPHALT COMPA
STREETS 54.93 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 101.43120.2199 NP6562 014 00043
COMPUSA
CLASSES 1,860.00 CONFERENCE & SCHOOLS 101.41920.3320 787-011548 014 00044
OJ'S MUNICIPAL SUPPLY
STREETS 74.54 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 101.43120.2199 2440 014 00045
4111tHlHEIMER DISTRIBUTING
LIQUOR STORE 48.00 MISC TAXABLE 609.49750.2540 51002 014 00027
=' LIQUOR STORE 4,052.95 BEER 609.49750.2520 51003 014 00026
4,100.95 *VENDOR TOTAL
--'- ,-,---~--_.- _.'-' -'-'---
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF MONTICELLO
08/19/1999 11:23:13 Schedule of Bills GL540R-V06.00 PAGE 4
.NDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE POll F /P 10 LINE
MUELLER/ROBERT J
WAG PRTNSHP & HOGLUND 41 226.00 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 450.49201.3199 WR-1545 014 00075
NORTH AMERICAN WETLAND E
WWTP 1.470.00 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 602.49480.3199 761 014 00083
NORTHWEST ASSOC CONSULTA
VILLAGE APTS PLAN 608.75 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 101.41910.3199 014 00077
TATTOO CODE 119.00 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 101.41910.3199 014 00079
GENERAL 184.35 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 101.41910.3199 014 00080
OAfs. PLAN 404.03 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 101.41910.3199 014 00081
IONING 225.00 MISe PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 101.41910.3199 8833 014 00078
GROVELAND PLAT/PUD 353.75 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 101.41910.3199 8834 014 00076
JULY MEETINGS 450.00 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 101.41910.3199 8835 014 00082
2,344.88 *VENDOR TOTAL
OLSON & SONS ELECTRIC. I
CH 55.00 MISC REPAIR & MTC SUPPLI 101.41940.2299 17752 014 00086
LI BRARY 61. 00 REPAIR & MTC - BUILDINGS 211.45501.4010 17753 014 00087
STREET LI GHTING 175.09 MISC REPAIR & MTC SUPPLI 101.43160.2299 17767 014 00085
LI BRARY 55.00 REPAIR & MTC - BUILDINGS 211.45501.4010 17799 014 00088
_ARKS 23.07 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 225.45201.2199 4055 014 00084
369.16 *VENDOR TOTAL
ONE CALL CONCEPTS, INC.
JULY CALLS 140.00 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 601.49440.3199 9070507 014 00089
PATRICK MICHAEL SUPPLY C
PARKS 7.88 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 225.45201.2199 68760 014 00090
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
LIQUOR 787.30 LIQUOR 609.49750.2510 522613 014 00029
LIQUOR 175.25 WINE 609.49750.2530 522614 014 00030
LI QUOR 464.00 LIQUOR 609.49750.2510 523575 014 00028
1.426.55 *VENDOR TOTAL
PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING
LIQUOR STORE 398.80 MISC TAXABLE 609.49750.2540 593641 014 0002f
PIPELINE SUPPLY, INC.
WATER 53.31 SMALL TOOLS & EQUIPMENT 601.49440.2410 51368389.001 014 0009
WATER 25.30 SMALL TOOLS & EQUIPMENT 601.49440.2410 51368903.001 014 0009'
78.61 *VENOOR TOTAL
PITNEY BOWES
PW 148.70 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES 101.43110.2099 873834 014 0009
.EUSSE/JAMES L
- PUBLIC WORKS 150.00 PROF SRV - CUSTODIAL 101.43110.3110 014 0009
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF MONTICELLO
08/19/1999 11:23:13 Schedule of Bills GL540R-V06.00 PAGE 5
.ENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE PO# F /P 10 LINE
PREUSSE/ JAMES L
DEP REG 120.00 PROF SRV - CUSTODIAL 101.41990.3110 AUGUST 014 00094
270.00 *VENOOR TOTAL
PRO AG CROP CONSULTANTS,
CONSULTATION 1,075.00 PROF SRV - PSG, INC 602.49480.3080 014 00096
R J THOMAS MFG CO, INC
PARKS 354.63 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 225.45201.2199 00061298 014 00130
RELIABLE CORPORATION/THE
PUBLIC WORKS 45.64 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES 101.43110.2099 014 00103
CH 212.87CR MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 101.41940.2199 PL694100 014 00098
CH 53.76 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES 101.41940.2099 PSY61300 014 00104
CH 74.54 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES 101.41940.2099 PSZ20400 014 00105
CH 8 . 43CR MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES 101.41940.2099 PXY84000 014 00097
CH 121. 14 . MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES 101.41940.2099 PXY84000 014 00100
CH 8.43 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES 101.41940.2099 PX33200 014 00099
PUBLIC WORKS - SHREDDER 212.87 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 101.43110.5701 PYG06600 014 00102
CH 34.06 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES 101.41940.2099 PYG06602 014 00101
329. 14 *VENDOR TOTAL
4IIIlLIANT ENERGY
AN SHELTER 9.59 GAS 101.42701.3830 014 00106
RESERVE ACCOUNT
CH - POSTAGE FOR MACHINE 1.000.00 POSTAGE 101.41301.3220 014 00107
RIVERFEST COMMITTEE
LAND 0 LAKES DONATION 2,500.00 RIVERFEST 225.45215.4410 014 00108
RON'S GOURMET ICE
LIQUOR STORE 357.02 MISC TAXABLE 609.49750.2540 45303 014 00012
ROYAL PRINTING & OFFICE
PARK 8.09 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 225.45201.2199 7217 014 00110
LIQUOR 38.72 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES 609.49754.2099 7218 014 00109
46.81 *VENDOR TOTAL
ROYAL TIRE OF MONTICELLO
PARKS 8.00 VEHICLE REPAIR PARTS 225.45201.2211 069760 014 00113
WATER 347.75 TI RES 601.49440.2220 069915 014 00112
PARKS 16.55 VEHICLE REPAIR PARTS 225.45201. 2211 069961 014 00114
372.30 *VENDOR TOTAL
SALZWEDEL/PATRICIA A.
.AN CONTROL 1,227.43 PROF SRV - ANIMAL CTRL 0 101.42701.3120 AUGUST 31 014 00073
SENSUS TECHNOLOGIES, INC
WATER 86.06 REPAIR & MTC - MACH & EO 601.49440.4044 ZZ90018285 014 00115
-.- .---- .-.- - .-. -.- .-_.-'. -..
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF MONTICELLO
08/19/1999 11:23:13 Schedule of Bills GL540R-V06.00 PAGE 1
.ENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE POll F!P 10 LINE
WATER LABORATORIES, INC
WATER TEST 20.00 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 601.49440.3199 99H-156 014 00136
WATSON COMPANY, INC/THE
LIOUOR STORE 332.89 MISC TAXABLE 609.49150.2540 014 00022
LIQUOR STORE 0.35 FREIGHT 609.49150.3330 548756 014 00021
333.24 'VENDOR TOTAL
WILSON DEVELOPMENT SERVI
FILING FEE REIMB 13.30 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 450.49201.3199 014 00137
WRIGHT COUNTY HUMAN SERV
HEARTLAND EXPRESS 63.00 ADVERTISING 610.49804.3499 014 00138
WRIGHT COUNTY RECORDER
. FEES 127. 00 LAND 450.49201.5101 014 00139
WRIGHT-HENNEPIN COOP ELE
FARMS ELECTRICITY 12.28 BIOSOLIDS FARM IMPROVEME 602.49480.4385 014 00140
Y M C A - NW
CONTRACT 625.00 MIse PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 101.45177.3199 AUGUST 99 014 00141
~P MANUFACTURING eOMPAN
STREETS 71.48 MIse OPERATING SUPPLIES 101.43120.2199 57781915 014 00142
ZIEGLER CAT
125KW PORTABLE GENERATOR 39,071.66 OTHER EQUIPMENT 464.49201.5801 E0947001 014 00146
STREETS 2,089.05 EQUIPMENT REPAIR PARTS 101.43120.2210 PC080048801 014 00144
STREETS 10.32 EQUIPMENT REPAIR PARTS 101.43120.2210 PC080048802 014 00145
STREETS 1,063.58CR EQUIPMENT REPAIR PARTS 101.43120.2210 PR080005174 014 00143
40,107.45 'VENDOR TOTAL
.
....
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
08/19/1999 11:23:13
.ENDOR NAME
DESCRI PTlON
REPORT TOTALS:
.
.
AMOUNT
113,966.60
ACCOUNT NAME
RECORDS PRINTED - 000145
Schedule of Bills
FUND & ACCOUNT
CITY OF MONTICELLO
GL540R-V06,00 PAGE 8
CLAIM INVOICE PO; F/P 10 LINE
- _u ..._'. ~ -"- -...- - .
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF MONTICELLO
OS/19/1999 11:23:16 Schedule of Bills GL060S-V06.00 RECAPPAGE
. GL540R
FUND RECAP:
FUND DESCRIPilON DISBURSEMEtHS
--------------------------_..~
101 GENERAL fUND 32.853.67
211 Ll BRARY fUND 343.50
213 HRA FUND 530.80
224 SHADE TREE fUND 218.94
225 PARK fUND 8,595,18
226 COMMUNITY CENTER 75.34
450 96-04C HWY25/MNOOT IMPR 366.30
461 9S-03C COMMUNITY CENTER 3,300.00
464 98-24C BOOSTER PUMP/WW RIDGE 39,071.66
601 WATER FUND 703.48
602 SEWER fUND 2.762.33
609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND 24.182.40
610 TRANSPORTATION FUND 63.00
651 RIVERSIDE CEMETERY 900.00
TOT AL ALL FUNDS 113,966.60
~NK RECAP:
DISBURSEMENTS
BANK NAME
----------------------------
GENL GENERAL CHECKING
LIOR LIQUOR CHECKING
89,784.20
24,182.40
113,966.60
TOT AL ALL BANKS
THE PRECEDING LIST OF BILLS PAYABLE WAS REVIEWED AND APPROVED FOR PAYMENT.
DATE ............
APPROVED BY
............... ..................."
.............. ....... ..........,..
.. ...................................
.
-~-~- -----
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
~/10/1999 07:26:47
Payments for publication
CITY OF MONTICELLO
GL050S-V06.00 COVERPAGE
GL335R
Report Selection:
Aoproval Date..... ................. 08/23/1999
Payments Through Date... ........... 08/12/1999
Cutoff Amount to be Used.... .......
RUN GROUP... 00812
COMMENT... 8/120IS8
DATA-JE-ID DATA COMMENT
----------~--- -~~-~----------~-~----~-
0-08121999-010 8/12 CHECKS
Run Instructions:
Joba Banner Copies Form Printer Hold Space LPI Lines CPI
J 01 N S 6 066 10
.
.
-----'-- -- - -'--.-
-, ~- ,- -'- -~--- - -
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Payments for publication GL335R-V06.00 PAGE
8RC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
~10/1999 7:26:48
Approved on
8/23/1999 for paymentS Through 8/12/1999
Description Amount
Vendor Name
A E MICHAELS
A M LEONARD INC
AUDIO COMMUNICATIONS
8 & J TREE FARMS
8ARTON SAND & GRAVEL CO.
8ELL80Y CORPORATION
BELL80Y CORPORATION BAR SUPPLY
8ERNICK'S PEPSI COLA COMPANY
BOYER TRUCK PARTS
BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION
BUFFALO BITUMINOUS. INC.
CENTRAL LANDSCAPE SUPPLY
CHADER BUSINESS EQUIPMENT
CHASKA CHEMICAL CO.. INC.
COMMERCIAL ASPHALT COMPANY
CU8 FOODS - MONTICELLO
CULLIGAN
DAHLHEIMER DISTRIBUTING CO
DAY DISTRI8UTING COMPANY
DONLAR CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
EARL F ANDERSON & ASSOCIATES
ELECTRO MECHANICAL CONTR. CO
ELECTRO-MECH SCOREBOARD CO
EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINT.INC
ENGLE/GREG
FRONTLINE PLUS FIRE & RESCUE
G & K SERVICES
GARTNER'S OFFICE PRODUCTS
GME CONSULTANTS. INC.
GRIGGS. COOPER & COMPANY
GROSSLEIN 8EVERAGE INC.
GRUHLKE/DAN
HARRY'S AUTO SUPPLY
HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT GROUP
HIGH TECH ROOFING
HOGLUND TRANSPORTATION
HOGLUND/DEAN R.
IANO/JAN
IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS
JME OF MONTICELLO
JOHNSON BROS WHOLESALE LIQUOR
K MART STORE
KEN ANDERSON TRUCKING
KING/JAMES W
KLEINSTEU8ER/MICHELLE
KOVICH/PATRICIA KAY
L & L ASPHALT. INC.
LARSON'S ACE HARDWARE
.
.
STREETS
RIVER MILL PK IMP
RADIOS/PARKS
TREES/WWTP
LIBRARY
LIQUOR
TAXABLE
BEER
STREETS
SEWER
STREETS
RIVER MILL PARK
RECORDER/CITY HALL
SUPPLIES/PARKS
STREETS
RIVERFEST
RENTAL HOUSE
8EER
BEER
PYMT/COMM CTR
STREETS
LIGHT REPAIR/PARKS
PARKS
REPAIRS/FIRE DEPT
TRAVEL REIM8
SUPPLIES/FIRE OEPT
UNIFORMS/PARKS
OFF SUP/CITY HALL
COM CTR
LIQUOR
BEER
TREE REPLACEMENT
STREETS
WATER
REPAIR LIBRARY ROOF
HEARTLAND 8US PYMT
LEGAL FEES/COMM CTR
REIMB/SUPPLIES
LIBRARY COpy MCH MTC
FIRE OEPT REPAIRS
WINE
PARK SUPPLIES
ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES
LAWN SERVICE/CEMETARY
TREE REPLACEMENT
REIM8/CLEANING SUP/C HAL
LIBRARY PARKING LOT
PARKS
147.86
376.27
723.29
658.47
296.24
728.90
831.70
601 .20
6.03
1.744.75
314.38
287.64
318.44
75.00
456.33
27.73
24.92
3.435.30
980.05
751.361.65
97.02
933.50
85.00
215.31
192.77
78.98
1.149.73
450.68
2.031.50
5.157.76
7.635.62
30.00
222.50
395.08
889.53
5.562.46
506.38
13.00
47.52
235.27
3,780.67
46.84
165.00
1.421.78
30.00
8.52
1.495.00
845.76
- -'- - --"- -.-. --- - -~.~- -. -- -.. .-..-
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Payments for publication GL335R-V06.00 PAGE
8RC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
~10/1999 7:26:48
Approved on
8/23/1999 for Payments Through 8/12/1999
Vendor Name
Description Amount
MARTIE'S FARM SERVICE
MAUS FOODS
MENARD. I NC
MICHELS TRUCKING. INC
MN DEPT OF TRADE & ECON DEVEL
MONTICELLO PRINTING
MONTICELLO TIMES
MONTICELLO VACUUM CENTER
MOON MOTOR SALES, INC.
MTI DISBTRIBUTING CO.
NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS
NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY
NORTHERN TOOL & EQUIPMENT CO
OHNSTAD/ELMER
OLSON & SONS ELECTRIC, INC.
PAUSTIS & SONS
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS CO
PHOTO I
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GROUP
RELIANCE DATA CORPORATION
RELIANT ENERGY
RIVERFEST COMMITTEE
RIVERPLACE PHYSICIANS
RON'S GOURMET ICE
SCHARBER & SONS. INC.
SCRUB A DUB CAR WASH CENTER
SHADDUCK YOUNG & BROWN. LLP
ST CLOUD FIRE EQUIPMENT
S1 CROIX RECREATION CO. INC
ST. CLOUD RESTAURANT SUPPLY
STREICHER'S
THERMOGAS COMPANY
THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
TSR WIRELESS - MINNESOTA
U SLINK
US FILTER DISTRIBUTION GROUP
USA WASTE SERVICES. INC
VANDERLINDE/JUDY
VIKING COCA COLA
VIKING COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO
WATER LABORATORIES. INC
WATSON COMPANY, INC/THE
WINE MERCHANTS, INC
WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITOR-TREAS
WRIGHT HENNEPIN SECURITY SYSTM
.
.
**
RIVER MILL PARK IMP
LIBRARY
RIVER MILL PARK IMPR
FREIGHT CHGS
INTEREST/WWTP
BUS TICKETS
ANNUAL FINANCE REPORT
CITY HALL CLEANING SUP
PARKS
PARK SUPPLIES
OHONE CHG/TOM B
STREET LITES
STREETS
MILEAGE REIMB
FIRE DEPT MTC
WINE
WINE
COMM CTR
SUNNY FRESH TESTING/WWTP
COMPUTER MTC/C HALL
LIO STORE
REIMB/RIVERFEST
STRTS
ICE
PARKS
TOKENS/BLD INSP
LEGAL FEES/COMM CTR
WATERT DP/FIRE EXT MTC
RIVER MILL PK IMP
MISC
FIRE
HWY 25 IMPT
BEER
PHONE/PATTY S
WEB SITE/E MAIL
RESALE/WATER METERS
GARBAGE CONTRACT PYMT
COM CTR LEGAL FEES
POP
POP
WATER
MISC
WINE
AUGUST SHERIFF PATROL
DEP REG SECURITY PYMT
Final Totals...
317.87
104.70
2,063.92
20.00
537,503.98
441.12
3.542.01
25.05
133.14
93.38
442.02
18,402.24
125.65
33.88
168.91
819.40
3,634.22
63.10
1.452.00
1.643.00
11 .95
2.000.00
85.00
374.09
770.38
100.00
1.019.72
230.32
2,477.35
217.20
9.59
1,054.08
11.462.50
48.22
390.88
4,794.71
4,203.03
522.91
423.91
224.20
30.00
919.22
169.70
33,140.33
35.10
1,432,863.31
- .- - - .- -. .-
-- - -- -. - .- - - .- -- -.- .-
.. .. - ,.
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
~10/1999 07:26:49
Payments for Publication
FUND RECAP:
DISBURSEMENTS
fUND DESCRIPTION
'101
211
224
225
226
240
358
436
450
461
462
601
602
609
610
651
~--~--~~~---~~--~--~-~-~---~
GENERAL FUND
LIBRARY FUND
SHADE TREE FUND
PARK FUND
COMMUNITY CENTER
CAPITAL PROJECT REVOLVING FD
WWTP NOTE
93-14C WWTP EXPANSION PRJ
96-04C HWY25/MNDOT IMPR
98-03C COMMUNITY CENTER
98-12C 7TH STREET EXTENSION
WATER FUND
SEWER FUND
MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND
TRANSPORTATION FUND
RIVERSIDE CEMETERY
56.559.31
3.515.17
60.00
12.575.68
12.30
30.09
537.503.98
658.4'7
1.137.08
755.494.80
159.32
11.424.00
3.413.00
43.198.28
6.003.58
1.118.25
1.432.863.31
IAL ALL FUNDS
BANK RECAP:
DISBURSEMENTS
BANK NAME
~---~-~--------------------~
GENL GENERAL CHECKING
LIQR LIQUOR CHECKING
1,389.665.03
43,198.28
TOTAL ALL BANKS
1,432.863.31
.
- -.- -- --. ----. - -- -.- - -- -
350 Westwood Lake Office
8441 Wayzata Boulevard
Minneapolis, MN 55426
BA. Mittelsteadt, FE,
Bret A Weiss, PL
Peter R. Willenbring, I'.L
Donald W. Sterna, PE.
Ronald B. Bray, 1'.E.
& Associates, Inc.
612.541 ~4800
FAX 541~1700
Memorandum
To: Bret Weiss, P.E.
cc: John Simola, City of Monticello
Charles Rickart, P.E. cf'1-
From:
Date:
August 20,1999
Re:
River Forest Access at Gillard Avenue
All Way Stop Sign Assessment
WSB Project No.1 01 0.83
The intersection of the River Forest development and Gillard Avenue was reviewed for the
possible installation of an all way stop. Currently the River Forest Access is stopped at Gillard
A venue.
The traffic control at an intersection such as this is critical to the operation of both intersecting
roadways. If incorrect traffic control is installed for the existing traffic conditions and
topographic characteristics of the intersection, unduly delays and even unnecessary accidents
could occur. The traveling public, especially persons not familiar with the area, typically drive
based on instinct. Drivers subconsciously evaluate their surroundings to determine if a stop sign
should or shouldn't be located at an intersection approach. If stop signs are installed at a location
where they are unnecessary or not warranted, the traveling public over time will begin to ignore
the signs. This will then become an enforcement issue. It is very difficult to determine what the
correct intersection control should be, however, several factors should be evaluated when
determining intersection control. These include:
Traffic Conditions - Traffic volume, speed of traffic approaching the intersection, the
number ofturning vehicles at the intersection and vehicle make-up.
(i.e. trucks, buses, etc.)
Topographic Conditions - The grade of each approaching roadway, location and size of
adjacent buildings or structures, angle of the intersection,
geometries, (i.e. numbers of lanes) and if a school or park is
located near the area.
Human Factors - The age ofthe driver, how the driver responds to certain situations
and physical attributes of the driver.
Based on these conditions and factors, potential intersection control can be evaluated and
determined. Several techniques can be used to determine what kind of intersection control is
warranted at a specific intersection. When developing an assessment of an intersection for all
Minneapolis · St. Cloud
Infrastructure Engineers Planners F:\WPWIMJOJO.83108J999bw_wpd
EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
Bret Weiss, P.E.
August 20,199
Page 2
way stop sign control the traffic conditions and topography conditions can be used quite readily
in the review procedure. The human factors are very difficult to define and evaluated as part of
the analysis procedure. Therefore, engineering judgement should be utilized when evaluating the
human factor of the analysis procedure.
The best procedure in evaluating the need and location of all way stop sign control can be found
in the Minnesota Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MMUTCD), Section 2B-5. The
warrants for an all way stop sign control based on the MMUTCD are:
1. Where traffic signals are warranted and urgently needed, the all way stop can be an
interim measure. Or,
2. An accident problem indicating that five or more reported accidents of a type
correctable by all way stop sign installation. Or,
3. Minimum traffic volumes:
a. A total vehicle volume entering the intersection from approaches must average at
least 500 vehicles per hour for eight hours of an average day. And,
b. The combined vehicular and pedestrian volume from the minor street or highway
must average at least 200 units per hour for the same eight hours, with an average
delay of the minor street vehicular traffic of at least thirty seconds per vehicle.
However,
c. When the 85th percent approach speed of the major street traffic exceeds 40 miles
per hour the requirements can be reduced to 70 percent.
In addition to the requirements found in the MMUTCD, the safe stopping site distance should be
evaluated.
Based on these criteria, additional information should be collected to determine if this
intersection would meet the criteria for an all way stop sign controL My initial observation is
that the intersection will not meet these requirements. However, the sight distance aspects need
to be evaluated further with this traffic volumes to determine the traffic control required at the
intersection.
F:\ WPW/NI/ 0/ 0.83\08/ 999bw. wpd
INFORMATION ITEMS
August 23, 1999
Update on missine liquor ston deposit (R.W.)
LMCIT, our insurance company, has processed the claim to recover our lost deposit, less the
$500 deductible, that occurred last July 4th. We received a check totaling $7,900.00 on the
shortage. As an additional note, the Council should also bc aware that Mike Fishbach,
Assistant Liquor Store Manager, voluntarily completed a lie detector test through the Sheriffs
Department which he passed in regards to this missing deposit. We still don't know what
happened to the deposit, but it is our belief that it was lost somehow by the bank after the deposit
was made.
"
<0 "
JI ... '" P- ~
"
'" ~ fj L.
::; '" 'J ~
-g ~' " e; '" "^ ~
" '" ;.... " ~
" '-' ~
" "E ;. '" " " '" " - ~
" ;:j} 2 ?:' i.O 1'1 ~'
~ ~ ;. ~ :e "d ~
~ is g '" e;
- "E ~ "
6 ~ ~ i:: ~ 2 f:! " ;. - ;:;
::; " :- co g co '" '"
- ~ " '"
U '" '" " '5 g E E " ~ ',e c "0 " "E " f ;:; "E ..:J 2
g " f0- e; ~ "0 I "0 ~
....,; L. " '" '" "E ~ ~ '" .2 -'0 ... ;. '~ ;. ~ ~ " ;. ~
co JC .E? " " " " ~ ~ ... "" ~ .is <5 ~ " "E
;:; 2\ 0;; ~ ." s " '" ~ i ~ ~J " co :E ~ 6 6
:- ]:~ " ~ " 0:: c'J :::) E; " E ~ ~
~ := - g " ~ 0;; g E E
... "E ~ '" -'" ~ "^ "^ ~ '" '" '" '" '" "^ ~, ~
c ;: 0;; <i.: "^ i.: '" !' "0 25 g: Q ; ~ '" '" '" :> g: ~ ~ '<' z '" '" '" ~ l Ii '" '"
'" > ..,. '" co Z " g: is ~ "" " "" ::s 1; ~ ~ - - - ~ ~ z g: ~
"" "" ~ '" ;? C' :z :; ~ ", - - ~ ~ E fa C' - ~ ~ '" ''-,
'r, ~, '" 2 V-i ~ u '" '" i; ::; "., ;::: 'r, ,~ or, '" ;e co '" ;0 ""
.::' ~ '" ""
~ z ~
c Or,
t. - -
.: E "" ;::: v,
~ ~
~ <
'E ~ ~ ~ "" '" '" o, '" o, ~ '" e-, ~ '" '" ~ '" '" o, '" '" o, '" '" ~ ~ ~ '" '" '" e-. o,
~ g: g: ~' '<' g: g: z g: z ~ z ~ ~ '" ~ '" z z z ~ ~ ~ z ~ ~ ~ z ~ z ~ g:
g '" ;; ~ t:: C:.' :K :z :z (2 ~ M .-c -c 00 - z "" ''-'
~ '- S; C' '" "- '" '" ::; .., ~, ::::: ;a ;a C' tc! ;a C' ;a ;a '" 00 ?; "" ;;c
.., .., .., '" .., ,- "., ..., ..., 00 ''-'
::;
u
8 '" o, o, '" '" "" '" '" o, ~ '" '" "" '" '" '" o, '" '" '" o, ~ '" '" e- '" '" ~ ~ '" '" ~ '" '" o, ~ '" ~ '" '" '"
z ~ ~ z z z z ~ ~ ~ ~ z z ~ z z z ~ '<' ~ z ~ ~ z ~ ~ z ~ ~ z ~ ~ z z z z z z '<' z z
c "" 00 ..,. ''-' "" :z :z :.; ..... ~ '" ~ '^, .., - ~ ~ "" :;s ''-' ..,. "" ~ ~
:g '" C' C' C' C' C' ::; ~ (::' tc! >a ~ C' C' ~ '" C' ~
::0 ~ ;;; '" '" '" :'3 '. ~ "" '- 00 00 '- 00 00
0; '" '" 'n 'n Or. ''-, "" ..,. "- or; 00 Or, ''-, 00 "" '" '"
E :S
'"
u
~
~~~ ~ '" '" o, '" '" ~ o, '" o, '" '" ~ ~ o, '" o, '" '" '" '" '" '" ~ '" o, ~ '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '"
"" "" '- ~ Z ~ Z ~ ~ Z Z Z Z Z Z ~ Z ~ Z Z ~ ~ Z Z ~ <::: z z ~ ~ 'Z: $ z z z 0 z $ ~
E ~I.O\O ~ 5! ~ ..,. ..,. ..,. ~ ~ '" ~ '" '" ..... s. ..-, "" S{ '" '" '" :'2 ""
tc! So; C' :i; "" "" C' ;;; ;;a st ~ "" ;; ~ "" "" ~ 8 ~ ~ C' ~ 8 So; C' C'
:S ..., 5'S Or, '" "" Or, ::; Or,
.., 'n or; '" .., ..., "" "- "- ""
.~
Q
z
'" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" g; '" '" '" '" '" ~ '" '" '" '" ~ '" '" '" '" o, e- '" '" '" o, '" '" o, '" '" '" '" '" ~ '" '"
0; ~ ~ '" Z Z Z Z '<' Z Z ) Z Z Z ~ ~ Z Z Z ~ ~ '" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '<' Z ~ Z Z o, ~ '" Z Z ~
.. ::; '" '" '" '" o, ,3:; ..,. ~ ..,. ~ ..,. "" (::' ~ '" '" ,3:; 00 00 '" '" ::; ~ ..,. '"
Q tc! '" C' tc! t:! C' C' tc! ~ ;;; :::: 5i ;;; ;;a '":! C' r::! ~ ;;a C' t::: ~ ~ 8 (::' t:! '" 8 8 8 ~ ~ ~ S; 8 CO
E "" ''-' ''-' ;:::
C Or, .., ..,. ..,. '" "" ..,. Or, ..... ..,. ..... "" ..,. ..,. "- ""
'1 '"
c -
0 ~
..;
C '" ~
~ '" ... " " '" '" " '" '" "
" 1 " " ] ~ ... <> <> " <> <> <>
f,g ~ .~ " ~ <;; .~ -g ~ ] g ~
<;; ~ ~ J .t: "'5 'f ~ -'= j .., ~ ~ ~
d " ~ ~ ... " " " '" '" '" '" '"
:- ~ ~ :- :. ;;. {I ;;. {I {I {I ;;. ~ {I {I ~
..c E "E "'" "0 "'" 'E "0 "0
.... "0 "0 "0 "0 11 "c 2 11 ... ?: "0 " <> ~ "0 "0 " l'i ~ " ~ l'i "0 ""c 'i
'" <> "0 " ~ i 'i? ~ & " ~ & ~ ~ ~ & & " ~ ~ '" & ~ ~
" ~ Of; ~ '= ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
'" '" 1.! ,S c Ii <> c g .lE '" '" Ii Ii
;:8 '" " ~ ~ <> ~ ::2 "5 " .~ .~ " ~ ~ ~ ~
't: ," :s '" ." 't: 't: ::J ." ~ '" " ~ '"
& <2 <2 of g ~ " & <2 ~ ~ " '"
~~ " .to ~ C '" 1: " .; ..c ~ 0 "'.to " 1: -'0 1: ~ 1: 0 1: 1: 1:
;i " " <> ;3 ~ o <> 25 :5 " 0 0 :5 :5
:;) (;) C ~ ~ ~ "" 0 :.:> ~ r:!l r:!l ..sQ :;) 0 0 (;) 0 0 ~ 0 (;) 0 0 0
..
~ "
..Q
S
i/5 "
~
"
s
i
!
i/5
I:; <-
...
e s
"
6 2:
" I:;
s
~ i.:
I:; <-
"
'" s
" "
0 2:
~
~
'"
z
'"
;0
0\
0\
0\
....
~
c
J2
u
~
Eo--
'"
c
.Z
....
i:':
'0
;;
Cl.l
U
C
i:':
C
:c
I.,
o
.0
o
-;:;
"i
.s
~
>
""
':" b
~":J ;;
:g -E' e>,
~ 1: .2
" J ~ < J e>, ~.l
~ .g "
~. '" B '" <<: I "
1'i ~ ~ " " 1 '" l' .i
15 e>, C!
" '" " 0' -
g ? ~ E ~ '" 1 \i2 '" oo ~ '"
.2 .~ ~ '" '" "" ;; :} .2 -'0 "
~ ~ 1'i ~ < !! :>
e ;II:...: < ~ 'r, - c.- o
" '" ~ '" 1 il
U " 1'i " " '" 1'i 1'i '" '" "B "E '" ~ @ " :> ..0 ~ C 0 e
~ ] c ~ ,] f ~ ~ " ~ ~ " " c '" 'r, 5 " ... c.- "-. f!
f- ~ ~ 5 ~ ~ " " ~ ~ ~ " 1! " ;; ~ " ~ C :;., .~ C
-.; -.; ..; "F a ~ c ~ c c g '" ~ 2 - ~ ~ 5 ~ 8 c ;;: c "
> :> ~ E " E e E " :i ~ it '" Z E " "- - "- "
0' ?2 " 0- "" 0' "" "" c- O' ~ "" '" 0' O' '" '" "" Z <5 ~ ~ .~ J < "" '" '" '" 0- O'
~ '" '" 0- ~ ~ so: 0 0 ~ "" ~ ~ ~ c- ~ so: O' O' -;;; <( ~ 'P '" '" '" '" ~
"" '" N '" "" ~ 2; '" ?:: > -'" "; '" .~
'" ;:;; c 00 c O' - '" 00 '" c S "" ;c '"
('I ~1 2! r~ c:' ~I t:. ~, - :a :a - - fi fi - E:' C:' - - 'r, oo ~ -' 5; 00 - E ~
i<; ~ :.0 :.0 ~ .~ .~ i<; i5 " U :.0
'n ;c "" '" '" '" 00 '" '" "'. 'r; 'r, "" "" '" ,- 00
~. '" c- O' O' "" '" O'
". ~ ~ $ .g; ?:: \i2
C '" "" 00 C
,.. 0< .; ~ oo ::: :::
E " 0<
E: oo <r,
~ ~
~ <(
"
'"
g '" "" '" O' O' O' O' "" '" O' '" "" '" '" O' '" O' '" O' "" O' O' '" "" O' O' O' ""
~ ~ '" O' ~ ~ ~ ~ ?:: ?:: ~ ~ O'. ?:: '" ~ ~ '" S2: ~ ~ ~ ~ '" ~ O' ~ ~
'" C:' ;:""1 00 00 Oa 00 ~ O' ~ ~ ;"1 2; '" -
" C:' C:' Sl ~ C' ~. ::: :a :a :a ~ ;;;: S; - 0; Z
~ 00 :.0 " '" ;;.; Oc
;; .r; "- '" '" '0 '" '0 00 00 '" '" 'r;
"
U
" '" O' O' O' '" O' O' O' '" '" '" '" "" '" '" '" O' O' '" '" O' O' '" '" O' O' '" O' '" '" O' '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '"
.... ?:: ?:: ~ '" e: S2: ~ ~ ~ ~ ?:: ~ <: ~ ~ ~ '" ~ ~ ~ ~ '" ~ ~ e: ~ ;; ?:: ~ '" ?:: ~ ?:: ~ '" ?:: ~ '" ~ ~
c: '" " ~ C:' '" ;::; ~ oe ~ oe "" '" ~ '" oe ~ '" '" '" 25 S '"
.. C:' S; f'! oe C:' S r:: ~ " - " ~ ~ ~ C:' C:' ::: Oa - "" ;:? :::: :;; ~ C:'
- :2; 00 '- :;;0
c. .. oe '" '" '" '" '" '" "" '" '0 ;c <r, 'r; 'r; <r, oe " "" ""
e 8
e
U
~
i;;;
O' '" '" '" O' O' '" '" O' O' '" '" '" O' O' '" '" O' O' O' '" '" '" '" O' '" O' '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" O'
go ?:: O' O' '" ~ ~ ?:: ~ '" go O' ~ ~ ~ <: ~ ~ ~ go ~ go ~ ~ ?:: ?:: ~ ?:: S2: ~ '=; ?:: go ~ ~ S2: S2: ~ ~ go
2; '" -- 0< 2!
~ ..... '::': O' '" ~ ~ "" ~ ~ '" '" '::': Q '" Q oe '" '" '!': '" '"
;;;; ~, ~ C:' '" c' :? f;'! '" f;'! ;;;; ;;; "" ;;' "" '" C:' C:' S s: Sf ~
Q <r; :?l :?l :?l " '0 '" '" '0 '" <r; ~- oo
'0 '" '" '" '" "- c'. " oe
.~
0
z:
.& O' O' O' '" '" '" O' '" O' O' O' '" '" O' O' '" ~ O' '" '" O' O' '" O' g '" '" "" '" '" 0' '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '"
go g; ~ ~ 0' '" g; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ go ~ ~ O' ~ ~ "3 ?:: ~ ~ ~ '" ~ ~ ?:: S2: ?:: '" ?::
.. ~, '" ~ ~ ?:: ~ 00 00 N N '" oe '0 '0 ::'l: '" ~ :::::
.& Q C:' c'. Sl S S - '" '" '" C:' f;'! '" r:: r:: ~ ;;;; '::': t:2 ..... S C:' 'r; C'l C:' C:' c'. s: '" C:'
" :.0 :2; '" " '" :2; :2; 00
" 00 " "" '" '" '" "- " " " " "" " '" " c',
~ .$
" i
0
.E
~ ~ ~
'" ,~ '" '" " '" 11 .~ '" '" ~ 11 '" '" -~ '"
-a " " ,..; " " " ~ " " >.
S g ~ ] -.; ..~ <:; ~ <; <:; ~ ~
e "F ~ "ii ~ > "ii :.i:. "" "ii tj "F ~ ] 1! " 1! i5
" l1
U.;g > "to ~ ~ ~ '" '" ~ ~ '" '" ~ '" '" " .;g :> :> .;g :> :> " .;g " :> e> <J::
'" ~ ~ 0 "0 1'1 '" "0 "E "E "0 "0 "0 1'1 '" "0 "0 1'i ~ ~ "to ~ "to ~
... " " ~ "0 ~ " " " " ~ f ~ ~
i~ ~ ;; " " ;; " ~ " ~ " ~ ~ ~ ~ I>: ~ I>: " I>: f;!
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ S ~ '" ~ ~ i5
" Q Q ~ ~ J Q ii ~ " '" .g ii .~ '" ii i
.!,! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ [:1 ~ u ~ .~ '"' 'C ~ 'C ~ ;:c
f- '" :1! '" ~ !(i & '" ~ & ~ & ~ - ~ -'" ~ .0 .D
6 " c3 e: e: e: "2 '2
e: " Q :5 :5 0 .... :5 :5 Q 0 :5 :5 Q 0 " C :5 " Q :5 "
(J ~ ~ ::J (J (J (J (J (J (J (J (J ~ ~ Q (J (J ~ ~ q ;:0 ii:
..
.. ..
.D
f: E
in "
z:
..
s
..
<':
~
in
g "
" e
~ ..
0 z:
" E
e
i ii:
r; "
"
c: S
~ Z
0
" '"
E .J
i
0'1
0\
0\
.....
,
I:lJ.i
c:
J2
~
1:
t-
OIl
c
.:;
"""
e'l:
Q
;;
QJ
~
c:
~
.5
"C
I.,
o
C-
O
0'
2
'"
00
'"
'"
?
v,
2
11;
C
;;;
OJ;
c
12
<:.J
~
I..
f-<
'"
c
o
;:
~
'0
;;
<:.J
<:.J
C
~
c
E
o
a
o
'" oo
- ~ "", C! "
\....: E 'r. e
-':1 - 0.;
C ~ " ~ ;x j
;2 ~ "" -
" /~ '"
'" - "' '" ;2 '" 1l
" '" S-{ '" "
'" 0 "'" - '-" ~ v, 1l g .", >
E " g J ;;: <<:! ~ ~ g
- v, ~ f '" ~ "'" >
s .( ~ " '" '" O' ~ '" & " u 2 " ~ .~ i!
,- ::. ~ O' ~ ~ g: ~ ~ ;> ~ '" c
~ '-' ;,:; e ;,:; .;;' !:./J 1
;2 " '2: ~, 0 "to "' ] ~ '" .2 g - ]
- ~ '" "" "' ~ 2 ~ ~ ~ '" " " " "fJ
v " '" ~ ~ > '2: i! " " c:; ] ~j > ,~ "0 "to "to
~ c; S{ ] g ~ c <;; ] il
" ~ == ;,:; '" :': " ~ .] ~ .~ g ~ " " "
"'" t ~ ;> 0; - - '" c <: " <: iJ " }: c; ~ ~ " ~
< .E ,OJ g c; ~ ~
r. '~ ~ G 11 " i " .E :> c :> " .....: .:= '-' :f! " ;> - ~ ;,:; ;> ~ E '"
f-. "" E ~ ~ - ~ - ~ '" EO
" '" .E ~ '" Q " "'. O' ~ O' '" O' 0- O' O' O' O'
'" i3 '" C O' '" "" .-g -;:; '2: g: " g: 3- ~ }: O' '" g: ~ ~ ,0- O' 2- Z O' '" '" O' ~
g c. 2 ~ '2: oe ~) ;>. ~, '" ;> oe - ~ >(! O' ~ g '2: co oe ~ ~ ~ '" ~ '2: ~ E:'
~. '" '" Q' oe ':" - 1! " C! }: oo :::: C! co .~ - " t! oe C! ('l - c:: :::: '" ~ ~l
Jg U .~ B 'iO. 00 02
"., '" '" '" 'r, "., O'. '" '" '" -r. ..... '" "" ,- 'r, t, 'r. oo oe co co
-Co O' '" O'
~ z 2
;J ~, oe
.= <- '" :::: .....
E oo
" f
'-
'- -::
..!:
<-
:l::
1 O' '" '" O' O' O' O' '" O' O' '" O' '" O' O' o, o, O' O' O' o, '" O' O' o, '" O' O' o, '" O' O'
'" o, g: ~ "" g: :Ii :Ii g: o, '" ~ o, g O' ~ ~ 2: g: z :Ii g 'i':' 'i':' ~ g z. z O' ~ ~ 2:
i'o '" '" "" co oe ::a ~ '" - ~ ;a '" 00 "" ~ '" '" '" ~ O'
t:! $;;1 Q' '" ::a :::: "- ~ :;;; S3 t:! ~ ;; ...... ~ C! C:' C' .r. ;a - ~ co .....,
;; '" 'n 'n v, 'n '" '" '" '" .,., '" vi "" ::a
0
u
1: '" '" '" '" "'. '" O' O' o, '" '" o, o, '" o, O' '" '" O' '" '" '" '" o. '" o, '" '" O' O' '" o. O' '" O' ~ O'
~ ~ E:' g: ~ !2:' Z ~ '" Z ~ '" g: O' !2:' '<: ~ ~ !2:' 2: g: ~ '" ~ '" o, O' !2:' ~ $ !2:' Ii':: !2:' ~ ~ ~
'" '" '" '" ~ '~
~ '" ':" 00 O' O' ;':J - Ii':: '" C! :::: "" '" '" '" Z ~
:;;; t:! C! :::: :::: - '" c:/ (2 t:! '" '" '" ~ ~! '" ~ "' ~ Q' ~
'" '" "- 'r. :n if; :c '" i'o "' 00 ...... <;0; <;0; '" ;a 00 oo
.:: .,., .,., 'r. ." '" '" 'r. 00 '" '"
if "
d 0
2
"-
'" o. '" O' O' o, o, O' O' o. O' '" O' o, O' o, O' o. O' O' o, O' O' o, '" O' '" '" O' O' O' O' ~ O' O' O' O' O'
!2:' Ii':: E:' Z ~ Z Z Z Z ~ $ ~ ~ ~ !2:' ~ %i z !2:' ~ ~ Z 0 !2:' 'i':' ~ g; z $ O' z s $ $ g: ~ o.
" (2 ~ ~ ~ (2 ~ ~ r::> ~ r:::. 0 "" ~ t::' 00 ::a - '" Q
;; 'n .,., ~ ''-' ''-' C" '" '" C! C! :::: .,., (2 (2 r:::, Or, .,., <;0; t::' ~ C! t:! ;a ~ ~ ~ ~
0 '" .,., .,., '" '" '" '" '" '" '" 00 '"
.~
0
2:
.:: o, '" O' o, '" O' o, O' o, o, O' o, O' o, O' O' o, o, O' o, O' O' O' O' O' O' O' o, o, '" o, O' o, '" O' o, O' '"
2; ~ g; ~ Ii':: ~ Z ~ ~ g: $ o, ~ ~ Z ~ Z o, ~ Z ~ ~ Z ";; !2:' g: O' !2:' Z $ z ~ S $ ~ z $ ~
"" Q '~
0 Or. '" O' ~ N ~ O' O' O' 0 "" '" - '" '"
.:: (2 ~ (2 C! ~ t:! C! t:! C! ~ ~ ~ C! t:! ~ ,~ t::' cr, t:! C! S t:! t2 ~ t:! Q' ;a ;a ~ ~ SI ~ ::a
'~ :c ::a
C? c '" '" v, "" "" '" '" "., .,. .,., "" .,. '" '" "" "" '" '" "" 00
,S;
c E
0 ~
~
c $ $ ~
~ '" " '" " '" '" '" v '" '" '" v '" '"
" " " " ~ " " " ~ ] " " " " " " .~ " ,.,
5' ~ ~ ] '" ;> c; :-g ~ ~ :-g c; "" ~ ,g .g ~ ] " ]
i3 '<: ..0 ~ ~ ii ii ~ ;; "" ;> e
0 ~ ,~ ~ " " ~ " " ~ " -;:; ~ " !!
u ;> '" i g '" @) ;> ~ ;> >- ~ ;> ;> ;> '- ~ ;> >- ;> ... " c '" ~ '" " ~ '"
.... ~ ..0 ] .", .", .", .", ~ .", .", ~ .", ~ ~ 0 "':l ~ "0 l c 2 ~ ii -g ~ ii
~ i 8 !t " " <; ~ ~ <: ~ f
0 ~ & f;! ~ Ii! ~ ~ f;! ~ ~ f?! 0 ,~ " ~ f f :1:
" <: f Iii ~ :t 'is. Iii '" .~ '" .~ Iii ~ ij c U " ~
Co " & ~ '" '" " ~ .~ " ~ ~ " '" " ~ ;J: <
>, .= ,>1 ,>1 -;;; ,>1 'c ,>1 ,>1 f:l ~ ,>1 ~ ~ ~
f- '" ~ '" E ..0 " ..0 "
"2 ~ ~ 1:: "2 " <:S ~ "2 " 1:: iE "2 ~ ~ ~ "2 ~ "2 e :3 iE :5 :5 :5 e :;; " ~ " 1:: 1:: " " " "
::0 a v ;::0 <>:: a c:: ::J Ci v ::J ::J ::J ::0 v ::J v "- Ci l: v a
'-
~ <-
..0
e
<i? "
z
"
s
"
z
"
1:
rii
'"
'- ..
<-
c C
>- '"
6 z
.. '"
s '-
i !Z
~
.. 5
c
it "
0 ~
.. '"
E "
:f -l
'"
~' .
~
0'\
0'\
0'\
-
'"
~
o
~
'"
-0
:>
" '-, "
.g~ c - ~ ~J
C i ~ iO
'" -E '= ~
~ " ~
" "' '=
" '" == "" ;;; '"
- '" l':: ~ s: g- '" B
'" " '" ;;.-,
"'" ~- -,,; c
c 2 E:i ~I 2 &' ~ ~ ~ '"
" - l'::
E ~, I""~ >- ~ ~ '" !1 E
d 5' ~ " " <' S:~
f' " 3 :::i " J
"" 1l "E "- " 'n oc "" "'" "" "" "" "" c "" "" ~ "" "" -", --g
" "" ,,", ;;; ;;; " g
" <:: -", c ;:..) C.'I '-. " ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ " ;- ~ i " " ~ ~ "
" ~ ~ ] :j ~ "" ~ 'r~ >- ::: i: " >- i: ~ " ~ c
~ ; C; vi " - ~ c ~ ~ ~ ?; ~ c E E c .; '" ~ ~ c c 0 c
~ >- E ;::
- 0; Ui " ~ ~' "" 11 'r, E ;:: E 5' .:5 E E E E E
.-
'" '" '" " ~j c' .& 'u "" ~ "" >, '" '" "" '" '" '" '" '" '" "" '" '" '" ~ "" '" '" '" ~ '" '"
~ 2: !2 '" '" c u :< .~ v, ..0 ?: g: ~ $; g: !2 -.;; ?: "" 2: ~ !2 3; 2: !2 g; i?' ~ 2: ;; 1;
"", - ~ E ~ g ~ - iii - ,...., :< - 00 00 00 ;;.- "" 0< v-, - 'r: "--' "" "" 0 >
- - - c; r; '" " <:: 3 - - - "" "-' 53 "-' - ~ 53 - '" t:' '" ~, 00
:.0 ;;; " v :;;; 2i ::c ::c 03 ;;;; ;c ::c "
'" '" '" '" 'r, '" 00 ~ '" '" "" '" '" '" '" ,., '" '"
.;;' '" '" '"
f; Z ""
G - ;;
>-. ~ iZ
.= " ,..:'
g ~
.;: <
"
::z::
'" '" '" '" "" '" '" "" '" '" '" "'. "" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" "" '" G- '" "" '" '" '" "" '" '" ""
12 ~ ~ !2 <2: ~ '" <2: 2: ~ g> e: '" 2: ~ <2: ~ '" e: ~ ~ e: ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ e: <2: 2: 23 e: ~ ~
- - ~ '" cr, - "" 00 '" 00 "" 0; if, "-' '" ''', ~ '''' 'r, t:'
-= i:! ::::: ~ t:' ~ '" ;;;; ;;;; - :3 - '--. t:' ;:::: t:' t:' ~ ~ t:' - :a '" ~ "., - t:'
;; .. '" \0 \0 if, '" '" \0 '" \0 '" '" ,., '" '" 00 \0 ;;:; \0 '" :;;; '"
C 0
U Z
" '" '" "" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" "'. '" '" '" "" '" '" '" '" "" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" ~ '" '" '" "" '"
" <2: '" :; :; e: "" '" ~ 2: .g; ::; '" !2 ~ "" ~ "" e: 2: 5'i ~ ~ ~ ::; ~ g; "" 5'i 5'i e: e: 23 ~ "" ~ ~
" '" '" "" '" ;;;; ':;3 ::::: 0< '" "" '" "" oe '" '" '" '" if, '" 00
.;! ~ - ~ ~ '" '" \0 00 ::::: - \is ~ :::: :3 ~ t;' ;:::: 53 t:' ~ ~ 53 t:' t:' 0 t:'
C. " \0 \0 \0 if, \0 ::3 '" - '" .-- '" ;;:; \0 '" \0 <- '" \0 'r.
E ;;
c Q
U
~
ii::
'" '" '" '" '" '" "" '" '" "" '" '" ~ '" '" '" '" '" "" "" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" "" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '"
~ ~ 2 e: g; <2: 2: ~ e: e: ~ ~ ~ '" e: .~ e: "" g; ~ ;!; <2: g; e: ~ e: e: e: 2: <2: e: g: ~ ~ e: ;?;
.. ,...., t:' ,...., t:' '; 0; e: $ 0; oe t:' t:' \0 !:2 '" ~ ~ !:2 t:' !:'2 S;;
"" ::3 '--. ;:::: ;;:; g ::3 "" ~
Q '" \0 '" '" "" 'n '" '" ':;3 '" '" '" ':;3 \0 '" <- '"
'"
~ E
'" ;:
Z :I:
'"
Z
.. ~ "" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" "" '" '" ~ '" 00 '" "" '" '" '" "" '" '" ~ "" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '"
<2: ~ ~ g; e: ~ g; e: g; <2: $ ~ "" ~ <2: g; .g; ~ "" ~ ~ e: g; g; '" g; e: a- e: ~ e: ~ a- ~
Q ~ :3 ~ e: a- a- '" g; ~ oe "3 e: ~ C2 C2 '" '" ~ t:' M ~ C2 0 ?;;
t:' t:' t:' t:' ~ ;:::: ~ ~ ::c 0 ~ '" t:'
.!i '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" " \0
" .". .". .". .". .". '" '" .". .". '"
t1 c -
" .-
0 ..
'"
" .2< ~
-;; '" '" '" '"
c. '" " -0. " " ~ "
e '" ~ <:> ~ ]
-f: '" ~ ~
'" 74 .& " -.;; -.;; ~
u '" v, ;;.- '" ;;.- .g " "B .; " "B .; ;;.- " ~ " " " "B '" -E " {J " " '" '" '" '" ;;.- '"
--g "" --g "" "" --g .", "" --g .", 'E "" 'E --g 11 .", 'E 11
... E ~ g ..; " "" <;; " " " ~ .", " " ~ ~ ~ " "" ~ ""
c " ~ 1A ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1A ~ " ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ " ~ It ~ 1A
~~ ~S ;::; ~ -0. " is ~ c ~ ~ ~ ~ " <; "
,_ I.t.; ~ ~ "E; "E; -~ " J 'U; ~ ~ .2
~" 3; '" -" Q. 'f: u; " E -" E '" I:j E E -"
f:? E ~ .~...o '" :2 " f:? 6 ~ f:? i: f:? f:? f:? f:? f:? 6 ~ f:? f:? f:? " ~
0 <5 0 0 0 0 I'l :5 Vi G 0 0 0 0 => 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S 0 =>
..
~ ..
""
E
Vi ::J
Z
"
e
'"
~
..
::
~
'"
.. E
..
"
it "
0 z
" E
;;
.:: iZ
r; "
1:
i e
0 Z
E
.:: -
-
0'1
0'1
0"1
-
I
bLl
-
:E2
~
E
E-<
"l
C
.~
....
<:'1:1
"0
;;
QJ
~
C
<:'1:1
C
:.c
l.,
o
,e.
o
'"
'"
;y
00
.".
"
?
'"
c
;;
~
~
" "
: ~
6~
"
s _~
~
0'1
0'1
0'1
.....
I
!:liJ
:::
~
<:.i
C':
10.,
E--
"'l
:::
.S
-
C':
~
;;;
~
<:.i
:::
C':
.5
"t:l
10.,
o
.0
U
l:':
11
" '"
s ~
=tZ
~
~
2
r5
~I
Ci >-.
- ~
E~
~ ...
.s
"
0::
'"
t::
Q t
:..: r..
d
"
...
'"
..
'2. ~
2 "
CO
"'"
Ii;
g:~~&~~~
~~;t,~;!;~~
0000 ~\?ioo
0-.0-0-.0"00'10'.0'\
~~~~~~$~
QEa~~:;!~;a;;'
"
...
'0
z:
*~~~~~~~
~:;~fi~~~Ei~
~ .~
6~
~
'"
3 ~
E".-g
'OiJ
W ;:.. "'l u, ~ ~ Vl
~"B~'E~ ~'E
~ g ~ ~ fe ~ l
f-"eel:!"fj!!!1:!
::OdddCOd
" ~
1:: 2
tsl
"
"
z
~
r;;
...
"
2 "Z
~ .-g
lr] 12
'"
;
~
-.!""'C'
Q. .~
c... ~
u ~ .r ~ ~
~ ~-3g g
~E~o ~
o-.OS:~U0
~, 2::E ~ .2
~ :' ~ ~:t ~
"".
C>
~
"".
~
;0
"'~
2::""
11"1;;
~~
0.0,0>,0',0'.0'10>,
~~.~~~$~
~~;;:~:cs:~
O"IC'>O"\ 0'\ 0'\ 0\0\
~~~~~~$
S::2${~~s:;:;
0\0'10--0.0-.0\01
g-2::2:: 2:: g;2::2::
~'::QQQ~~
''>
~g:~~~""""
O;~o-,OO'l~~
~~s~sss
~.~.g.g
~~jj
M~"8"B~
f 5 fi f '3.
.~ ~ .~ .~ ~
:5:3~~&
& ~
,~ ~
~ -3
~~
>- '"
~, ~
"''C
~~
e e
Q:)Q:)
'"
'"
];
o
"
2
-'<
"
"-
..0
"i1
l!
<::
]
...
'.
c
-"
'"
2::
::":
'"
~
'"
""
0\ 0\ 0\01 0\ 0-. C'I
f~~~~z~
~ ~ ~ Ir,
0'10'10\0\0-.0-.0\
~,~~~~~~
or~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~ ~
0'1 0\ 0\0-. 0-. Q'I 0\
~~~~~~~
~(.'!C'!Q1C:!~~1
~~-e:t"~~~~
'" '"
!I,) In IV ...!::l
-g .~ ~ ,g .g
~ltE~-tl~
"3" E -f?- "'c '-' ~
c: ~g.3?;; ~j
-2 _~ ~ 1 ; ~ "
~~&::5c3a3~
g ~ ~
~ g g
222
'.r. ~ "'"
"& i
~~8
{"-... 012.1
--
In In 1"'1
-
'-
<-- <--
:::i'IOI 0-, 0",
~~~~
~ ~-... ::::
10"') In 11"') II"')
-diJ
s;r; i ~
~ ~J
,=i. ...
,. ~
g~
o
~ ~
i.: __
"" '-'
- '"
if, fJ
o
~
"
'"
5 '"
~
"'C~
-"'"
g
-'~' ",,'
~ ~
~:~
~-
~ l:
2~
""
~
';:"
'"
"''''
""2::
~'1::1"
:7
'J
"
'" "0
>- ;;
!;;.I)
:::= ~
~ ~.~ ~
~~2g;
.3'"
~ r:!
~ V',
G
}! -
@~
2~
lr, ~
""
;
~
""
2::
U
f-
Z""
~~
"-l
Z'"
"-l
"-l
'"
0'1 0'> 0-. 0-. 0"l0'l0-.
~$~f~~~
S!S:~\O~~~
"" 0>.
~~
'"
C;}C'!
In '''1
'"
::0
-~
~-----l'----'---'
"
Z
"
~
. ~ C-
- f
" ;1
u ~
~~
g~
;-n if.
:ad
&-
-q- ~
(Ll (; (J
:.; ~:'-o g
"E .v 6 ~ 2
~ J~~ ~
'E 0'0;1) 0;./
~ ~,~~ ~
~ 'I =;::: ~
~ if. ~
'3B;lJ]~
~ ~ B 2; c..
- "G,,: ~ .- ..c
;~~8~'~C
~6~)g~~~
r~ ~~~~
I -c--
-I---- /---;::- f----O'-" g:: ~
(j',a- ~ ~~~
f': g Si VI ~ .,...
$! [;;J ..,
I -'-0::-
I--~t-----g FE ~
C"a'- ~ ;;;~c::!
~~ 8 ~r-1I"1
~;z II")
'"
2::
<".
;~
~I--~
L--~ g~~
"""""""""""""""';5: ><' 2i~;r;
z ~ 2:: 2:: 2:: 2:: Z ><';:;: '::' if. ~
r:c t::'! r:c ;;;; ;:;; ~ r:c;;; ~ on
Ii") ~ ~ ~;f;) II"') 1Ij .",
""
~
<',
:;;:
0'10'10\0'10'.0'10'10"10'
~~~$$~~~~
~SI~S!S{S!SSSJ
"
:~
iJ
:>
'"
11
~
;5
~ ~ t 61 llJ
it .1} ,-g ~ ""0 :0
- - iJ 'f t ~ ~
~ ~ :> '" a ~ "
~'"C--o~ E 011 5
.0&&",""=,,, Jl
~ ~ B .5 ~ ~ u;
~ ,:t ,:t ,:t _~ Ii U .& :i1
~~~~tE~;5C;5
I _,,=""~
r ~~g
~ ......~o
~ g8S
~ ~-.o
-d"
C--.-I-- ~
- '"
-r: ...
~ [1~~
~ c:i ~._
.; :fl--5~
~ ~~]
.-c ;:~~
~ 88~
d..I ;....... r::::
"~ "'2 sr~_
<S ;::;,~,.-
.E~
_r---~'-
_ h.--I--
--I--I----
~
.9
-;;
-0
:>
J...- L..-
Q'\
Q'\
Q'\
......
13
c..
.~
-;:;
^'
~ ;!:
c "
" ~~
E
E ." .~
:'!
Q ~
W ] ~
<:;
" ~
,~ ~ ~
- <2: <2:
"" .". <=>
- ,r.
,,' "" <3
a' ~.
.8
." E
t: .8
~ -<
~
] "" ""
<2: ~
~ "" 2;
Q ~
:; '" '" ""
Q
U
~ ~ ~ "" "" ""
~ <2: <2: <2: ""
c ..... "" .". 2;
.!! - ~
"B. " "" <3 '" "" ""
E ';;
'" Q
U
~
...
'" '" "" "" ""
" $ ~ <2: <2: ;g
.. ;a <3 SQ l::: '"
"" <3
Q
"
.~
-0
z
~ "" '" ~ "" ""
<2: <2: ~ ~
" ~ <:':' 8
~ Q "" "" "" C:'
C .". ""
<i'i .~
.!:
0 "
~
.=
c '"
~ " -"
.0
" ^'
if ~ ~
'" ~ iJ
w '" '" :> "S
...ll ""
'" " ~ 1l ] ~
~~ ~ -~ ij
f- i;1 !! ;:; .:'!
0 ;:; 0
t.::J ~ "
'"
" "
'"
~ E
<ii ::I
Z
"
"
;;
z
0;
:::
<ii
~ "
"
c e
~ Z
0
E "
'"
~ ~
y.
~ E
il: "
0 z
" "
E ..:J
.::
"
-;;:
.;
c
.~
"'15
;:;
'"
<2:
""
;;c
~
=
:;
C,I
E
f-<
'"
=
.s
-
~
'0
>
<I.l
C,I
::
~
::
'E
o
~
U
""
')
COUNCIL UPDATE
August 23, 1999
Update on July 1. 1997 wind storm disaster assistance (R.W.)
The City recently received what should be our final reimbursement from state and
federal sources for disaster assistance relating to the cleanup costs of the July 1, 1997
wind storm.Total reimbursements have amounted to $274,848 to date. This represents
reimbursement of 75% through federal sources and approximately 15% through state
assistance. Our total eligible out of pocket costs amount to about $306,000, not counting
claims that were processed through our insurance carrier. Any items that were eligible
for coverage by our insurance company such as building damages, etc. are not included in
this total.
. .". ~
')
'f
INFORMATIONAL ITEM
By Ollie Koropchak, Economic Development Director
I received a telephone call from the owner of the property located at 1 Locust Street. Due to
destruction of property by the tenant, complains, and Sheriff's calls, the owner has decided to
place this property on the market. On August 11, the owner gave the tenant a 3D-day notice to
move. Via the Sheriff's department, the owner became aware that perhaps the City was
interested in purchasing the property. The HR.A will formally place this on their agenda for
September 8. Although the house is identified in the 25-year North Anchor plan (green area), the
HRA. is aware this was one home noted as a concern by the residents at the public informational
meeting. Council members, take a drive by. HRA.looking for direction. Need money. HRA.'s
policy, first step, go out for an appraisal.
. :...~ ....