Loading...
Planning Commission Agenda Packet 06-09-1987AGENDA L REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, June 9, 1987 - 7:30 p.m. Members: Richard Carlson, Joyce Dowling, Richard Martie, Barbara Koropchak, Jim Ridgeway. 7:30 p.m. 1. Call to Order. 7:32 p.m. :1. Approval of the Minutes of the Regular Meeting Held May 12, 1987. 7:34 p.m. 3. Public Hearing - A conditional use request to allow more than 12 apartment unite in a downtown commercial building. A variance request to allow five existing apartments to remain on the first floor of a downtown commercial building as a non -conforming use. Applicant, Gary Hammer. 7:49 p.m. 4. Public Hearing - A variance request to allow construction of a garage/porch addition within the sideyard setback requirement. Applicant, Max and Sue LeVelle. 8:09 p.m. S. Consideration to approve the final platting of a roplatted lot to be known as Colony by the Greene Third Addition. Applicant, Jay 6 Vivian Miller. Additional Information Items 8:19 p.m. 1. A request for partial subdivision of a residential outlot, Outlot H, Meadow Oak Addition, to be known as the Meadow Oak Fourth Addition. Applicant, Dickman Knutson. Council Action: Approved with conditions. 8:24 p.m. 2. Conditional use request to allow minor auto repair in a B-4 (Regional Business) Zone. Applicant, James Eioolo. Council Action: Approved with conditions. 8:29 p.m. 3. Consideration of adopting Tax Increment District 47. Council Action: Approved. 6:31 p.m. 4. A request for open discussion of proposed sketch plan for unplatted property. Applicant, Rivera Financial and Development Corporation. Council Action: Send back to Planning Commission. 8:33 p.m. S. Annexation Update. 6:53 p.m. 6. Set the next tentative date for the Monticello Planning Commission for Tuesday. July 14, 1987, 7:30 p.m. 8155 p.m. 7. Adjournment. MINUTES REGULAR MEETING - 14ONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, May 12, 1987 - 7:30 p.m. Members Present: Richard Carlson, Joyce Dowling, Richard Martie, Barbara Koropchak Members Absent: Jim Ridgeway Staff Present: Cary Anderson, 011ie Koropchak 1. The meeting was called to order by Chairperson Richard Carlson at 7:28 p.m. 2. Motion by Joyce Dowling, seconded by Barbara Koropchak, to approve the minutes of the April id, 1987, Planning Commission meeting. Motion carried unanimously. 3. Public Hearing - A conditional use request to allow minor auto repair in a B -C (Regional Business) Zone. Applicant, James Eisele. Mr. James Eisele was present to propose his request for renovation of an existing old storage building. Zoning Administrator Anderson indicated to Planning Co=icoion members Mr. Eisele's request to remodel the existing structure to accommodate the existing use of the building and also an additional type of use for the building. The current use of the building is storage for cold storage of restorable old care. Mr. Eisele would like to restore old cars there and repair them to like -new condition. However, before purchasing this property, Mr. Eisele would like to have approval to, at acme point in time, develop this into a business restoring old automobiles. In doing so, Mr. Eisale-s request requires a conditional use permit before a business of hie type will be allowed. The question was raised by Planning Commission members as to when or at what point in time would the minimum off-street parking requirements be put in and any screening should Mr. Eisele have outdoor storage of equipment, material, etc. Zoning Administrator Anderson countered that at ouch time when Mr. Eisele would apply for a sign permit to advertise his now prospective business, at that time the conditions would then kick in to minimum off-street hard surfaced parking and screening of outdoor otorago. With no further input from Planning Commission members, motion was made by Richard Martie, seconded by Joyce Dowling, to approve the conditional use request to allow minor auto repair in a B -d (Regional Business) Zone. Motion carried unanimously. 6. Consideration of Adopting Tax Increment District 07. 011ie Koropchak, Monticello Economic Development Director, was present -1- Planning Commission Minutes - 5/12/87 to explain to Planning Commission members Tax Increment District 47. The district is being created to facilitate development of the North American Window Company, the Norwegian Window Company relocating to Monticello from Norway. The proposed new building would be approximately 28,400 sq ft of floor area, with 25,000 eq ft of area for warehouse/ manufacturing, and 3,400 aq ft devoted to office/sales area. Some proposed projections for employment would be 21 new jobs created in the 0-2 year range, and an expected 40 jobs to be created in the 2-5 year range. With no further input from the Planning Commission members, motion was made by Barbara Koropchak, seconded by Richard Martie, to approve Tax Increment District 47. Motion carried unanimously. At 8:09 p.m., Barbara Koropchak left the meeting. 5. A request for o4en discussion on a Qroposed sketch plan for unplatted property. Applicant, Rivera Financial and Development Corporation. Zoning Administrator Anderson indicated to Planning Commission members Mr. Rivera -a conceptual request to get some input from Planning Commission members on his proposed rezoning request from B-3 (Highway Business) to R-1 (Single Family Residential). The part which Mr. Rivera would like to develop would be only what is existing in the city limits, with further development to extend further out into the annexation area. A preliminary review for utility services has been submitted to Mr. Rivera from our Consulting Engineer, Orr-Schelen-Mayeron. Mr. Dennie Taylor, Taylor Land Surveyors, was also present to explain how the original layout was developed by his firm and how the development will further project into the Orderly Annexation Area. The general consensus of the three Planning Commission members present was to have the developer meet with the City staff to go over everything that is needed for the preparation of Mr. Rivera'• proposed Highland Heights Subdivision site plan. Additional Information Items 1. A request for a partial subdivision of a residential outlotl Outlot H, Meadow Oak Additions to be known as the Meadow Oak Fourth Addition. Applicant. Dickman Knutson. Mr. Knutson -s request came before the City Council at their May 11, 1987, meeting. Zoning Administrator Anderson indicated to Planning Commission members that the City Council had tabled Mr. Knutson -s request until further drainage problems can be worked out with the City -s Consulting Engineer, John Badalich of OSM. -2- O Planning Commission Minutes - 5/12/87 2. A request for open discussion on a proposed concept plan for unplatted property. Applicant. James Boyle. Mr. Boyle, through his development agent, Lynn Clark:, has not pursued any further with their plane for possible development of the unplatted light industrial land. Zoning Administrator Anderson indicated that he had received no comments from Ms. Lynn Clark in regards to the proposed platting of this unplatted light industrial property. 3. The public hearing for annexation of the Monticello Orderly Annexation Area to be held on May 21, 1987, beginning at 1:30 p.m., in the Monticello City Council Chambers has been changed per a supplement received by Planning Commission members from Thomas A. Eidam, City Administrator. The hearing has been changed to June 3, 1967, at the Monticello City Council Chambers. d. Acknowledge receipt of letter from Monticello Times. Editor and Publisher, Donald Q. Smith. Planning Commission members present felt that it was a very good article on Maple Grove, realizing the City of Monticello is probably the next example of the Maple Grove situation. Planning Commission members indicated to Zoning Administrator Anderson that he send Mr. Donald Smith a latter thanking him for sending them a copy of the newspaper with the article enclosed on the city of Maple Grove. 5. Set the next tentative date for the Monticello Planning Commission for June 9, 1987, 7:30 p.m. Motion by Joyce Dowling, seconded by Richard Martie . to set the next tentative data for the Monticello Planning Commission meeting for June 9, 1987, 7:30 p.m. 6. Zoning Administrator Anderson indicated before Planning Commission members consider the next agenda item 16 that a final platting of Colony by the Greens was received by the City office personnel Into Friday afternoon. Mr. Jay Millar, part owner in the development of this project, would like to have had the Planning Commission conaider it at tonight's meeting. Motion by Joyce Dowling, seconded by Richard Martio, to table Mr. Miller'e request for final plat approval of Colony by the Groans Third Addition to the next regularly scheduled mooting data of June 9, 1987, 7:30 p.m. Motion carried unanimously. Motion by Joyce Dowling, seconded by Richard Hartle. to adjourn the meeting. The motion carried unanimously. The meeting adjourned at 8:21 p.m. Reopec+t/ful submitted, Gary Anderson zoning Administrator 0 Planning Commission Agenda - 6/9/87 3. Public Hearin? - A conditional use request to allw more than 12 apartment units in a downtown commercial building. A variance request to allow five existing; apartments to remain on the first floor of a downtown commercial building as a non-conforminq use. Applicant, Gary Hammer. (G.A.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Mr. Gary Hammer is proposing to convert the restaurant portion of the former Friends Cafe building where Pete -e Kitchen currently is into retail/office rental space. The use of this existing building is currently operated under a conditional use permit for which an ordinance amendment was drafted precisely to allow this type of activity within this building. By classifying it as a boarding house, Mr. Hammer vas allowed to renovate the upstairs into ten apartments and the rear portion of the lower level into five apartment units, with the front portion of the lower level being used for a restaurant. Mr. Hammer has had a tough time finding a renter that can make a living after paying the rent and expenses in renting just the restaurant portion of this building. Mr. Hemmer owns all of the equipment and just rents the equipment within the restaurant back to a prospective renter for the restaurant business. e Mr. Hemmer would like to romove all the restaurant equipment within the building and divide the entire restaurant space into retail or office rental apace. Before he can be allowed to do so, we have to consider the existing use of the building and how it would conform to the existing zoning ordinance. Retail/office apace in an allowable use in a B-4 Zone. But what isn-t allowed is more than 12 apartment building unite in a B-4 Zone and apartment unite on the main level of the building if the restaurant is put out of use. The only way his request could be considered is if you consider a conditional use request to allow more than 12 apartment unite in a B-4 Zone and also consider the existing five units on the main floor to the rear of the building be allowed as a non -conforming use in a B-4 Zone. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Deny the conditional use request to allow more than 12 apartment units in a B-4 (Regional Business) Zone. 2. Deny the variance request to allow, an a non -conforming use, five apartment units on the main floor of a commercial business building. H Al Planning Commission Agenda - 6/9/87 3. Approve the conditional use request to allow more than 12 apartment unite in a B-4 (Regional Business) Zone. 4. Approve the variance request to allow five apartment unite on the main floor of a commercial business to remain as a non -conforming use. C. STAFF RECOIBIBNDATION: Because the restaurant business portion of this building cannot be sufficiently operated for a prospective ranter or leasee of this restaurant business, we would recommend approval of a conditional use request to allow the ten existing apartment units upstairs and the five units downstairs as a conditional use allowing a total of 15 apartment unite in a B-4 (Regional Business) Zone. Also recognizing that five of these unite are on the main floor of a commercial business building, we recommend they be allowed to remain as a non -conforming use in a B-4 (Regional Business) Zone. This is a tough decision to render by the City staff in that losing an existing downtown restaurant business and acquiring more retall./office rental space doesn't seem practical at this time in that we have other commercial business buildings with retail/office space available which remains vacant. However, the owner of this building should have a feeling of how he can make hie business building more profitable with full use of this building rather than a partial use with a vacant restaurant portion of this building. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of the location of the proposed conditional use and variance request; Copy of the conditional use request allowing a boarding house in a B-4 (Regional Business) Zone; Copy of the B-4 (Regional Business) Zoning allowable commercial business uses. -2- 10-14-4 10-14-4 8. Wherever fuel pumps are to be installed, pump islands shall be installed. 9. At the boundaries of a residential district, a strip of not less than five (5) feet shall be landscaped and screened in compliance with Section 10-3-2(G) of this Ordinance. 10. Each light standard landscaped. 11. Parking or car magazine storage space shall be screened from view of abutting residential districts in compliance with Section 10-3-2(G) of this Ordinance. 12. Vehicular access points shall create a minimum of conflict with through traffic movement, shall comply with Section 10-3-5 of this Ordinance and shall be subject to the approval of the City Engineer. 13. All signing and informational or visual communication devices shall be minimized and shall be in compliance with Section 10-3-9 of this Ordinance. 14. Provisions are made to control and reduce noise. 15. No outside storage except as allowed in compliance with 1 Section 10-13-4 of this Ordinance. t� 16. Sale of products other than those specifically mentioned in Section 10-13-4 be subject to a conditional use permit and be in compliance with Section 10-13-4(F) of this Ordinanco. 11. All conditions pertaining to a specific site are subject to change when the Council, upon investigation in relation to a formal request, Linde that the general welfare and public betterment can be served as wall or bettor by modifying the conditions. 18. The provisions of Section 10-22-1(E) of this Ordinance are considered and satisfactorily met. (E) Machinory Saloo. (5-10-76 113). (F) Commercial plannod unit dovolopment as regulated by Chapter 20 of thia Ordinance. (5-8-78 450) (G) Boarding Mouse, provided that: 1) The building/structure is found to be oubotandard and/or blighted or contributing to blight, and in need of substantial rehabilitation. 0 10-14-4 10-16-6 a) The applicant must provide an overall development i concept plan. b) The applicant must demonstrate that said rehabilitation is the most feasible use alternative, and that said rehabilitation is not remodeling or simple structural alterations to accommodate a change in use. 2) There shall be no less than ten (10) unite nor more than 18 units, and that each unit shall be of a design considered to be an efficiency apartment. 3) At least one unit shall be on ground floor fully accessible to handicapped persons. 6) At least 501 of the floor area on the ground floor shall be developed as complete restaurant facilities with a minimum seating capacity of two seats per dwelling unit but in no case lose than 25 seats. a) Restaurant shall not be eligible for licensee regulating the sale of intoxicating liquors, non -intoxicating malt liquors, vine, or the display and consumption of liquors. b) The restaurant shall be so equipped to provide food service to the dwelling units if requirod. 5) The architectural appearance and functional plan of the building and site shall not be so dissimilar to the existing buildings or area as to cause impairment in property values or constitute a blighting influence within a reasonable distance of the lot. 6) All conditions pertaining to a specific site are subject to change when the Council, upon investigation in relation to a formal request, finds that the general welfare and public betterment can be served an well or better by modifying the conditions. (7/23/80 1136) 11 03 .l CHAPTER 14 "B-4" REGIONAL BUSINESS DISTRICT SECTION: 14-1: Purpose 14-2: Permitted Uses 14-3: Permitted Accessory Uses 14-4: Conditional Uses 14-1: PURPOSE: The purpose of the "B-4" Regional Business District is to provide for the establishment of commercial and service activities which draw from and serve customers from the entire community or region. 14-2: PERMITTED USES: The following are permitted uses in e -B-4" District: e (A) All permitted uses as allowed in a "B-1", "B-2", and "B-3" District. (BI Antique or gift shop. 1 (C) Amusement places (such as dance halls or roller rinks.) I [D) Auto accessory stores. (E) Enclosed boat and marine sales. [P) Books, office oupplies or stationery stores. i (GI Bowling alleys. [BI Carpet, rugs and tile. (II Coin and philatelic stores. [J) Copy service but not including press or nowspaper. (KI Costume, clothes rental. (L) Department and discount stores. (N) Dry cleaning including plant accessory thereto, pressing and repairs. (N) Dry goods store. (D) . Electrical appliance stores including incidental I repair and assembly but not fabricating or manufacturing. IN Employment •genies. CU IQ) Finance companies. (R] Furniture stores. [U] Haberdasheries and ladies ready-to-wear. [V] Insurance sales, claims and branch offices. [W] Jewelry stores and watch repair. (X] Leather goods and luggage stores. [Y] Record - music shops. (2] Restaurants, tea rooms, cafes, taverns and off -sale liquor stores. (AA) Sewing machine sales and service. [BB] Shoe stores. [CC] Tailor shops. [DD) Theatres, not of the outdoor drive-in type. (EE) Toy stores. IM Travel bureaus, transportation ticket offices. (GG] Variety stores, S 0 10 stores, and stores of similar nature. [HH) Wearing apparel. (II) Government and public utility buildings. 14-3: PERMITTED ACCESSORY USES: The following are permitted acceaaory uceo in a "B-4" District: (A) All permitted accooaory ucco in a "B-3" Diatrict. 14-4: CONDITIONAL USES: The following are conditional uaca in a "B-4" Diatrict: (Requ.irea a conditionat use pe4m t based upon paocedurea set 6oath in and aegutated by Chapter Yf o6 th.:a 04dinance.) (A) Open and Outdoor storage as an acceaaory uco provided that: 1. The area 1a fenced and screened from view of neighboring residential uses or if abutting a residential district in compliance with Chapter 3. Bection 2 (G) of this Ordinance. 0 Planning Commission Agenda - 6/9/87 6. Public Rearing - A variance request to allow construction of a garage/porch addition within the sideyard setback requirement. Applicant. K&x and Sue Lavelle. (G.A.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The LeVelle's are proposing to be allowed to construct an addition onto their existing garage to accommodate a screen porch and new garage addition. The existing garage would be renovated into a family room. Their request in to be allowed to put the addition onto the existing garage to within 12 feet of the southeast corner of the garage/porch addition and to within 17 feet of the southwest corner of the proposed garage/porch addition. The minimum requirement in the LaVelle's case, their -s being a corner lot, would be a 20 -foot aideyard setback. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Deny the variance request to allow construction of a garage/porch addition within the eideyard setback requirement. 2. Approve the variance request to allow construction of a garage/porch addition within the eideyard setback requirement. C. STAFF REC0KNENDATION: �. Staff recommends approval of the variance request to allow construction of a screen porch/garage addition to within 12 foot of the southeast corner of the proposed garage addition and to within 17 fest of the southwest corner of the proposed garage/porch addition. Consideration should also be given with the large amount of county road easement right-of-way, we see no problem with site line distances created by the construction of this addition. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of the location of the proposed variance requost! Copy of a site plan for the variance request; Copy of a floor plan layout for the proposed variance request. ------------------------ A variance request to allow construction 0 f aria 9 raga/porch addition within the sideyard setback requirement. -------------- Applicant: Max & Sue Lavelle GC V •;: - w•U7 160'0 -���---- 1\ ., 1� •1 (,,z[ � — _ , ss\\` ` 6 I Tie=, T-1 .�-_ . 1; r! A 01, AL1', PEF441T NUMER - A W. : ' Oil' -GAL: ;CRIP TION :%IJ0T­' CLOCK AMITIO, eT71 filAsyge— so. rT. or 31TE AREA� 30. rT. Or AREA OCCUPIED BY WILDING A c &XISri 0,01. 8- AifAmA jo enw C; A: V 2) INSTRYCt101a 'to jFI`Llycl- TmIS PC AM NEED NOT BE USED WHEN PLOT PLANS DRAWN TO SCALE ARE ritto WITH THE PCRHIT APPLICATION. ra, M CW BUILDING PROVIDE THE fOLLOVI NO INfORMATIO"l LOCATION Of PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION AND EXISTING IMF*oVtl4eNTS. :.* :NOW :U!LTpltMOTSClT. AND 39TaAC FINISH COMT*UA3 0* DRAINAGE. V I. A C T;.....W 11.10ITI, !I:IITLFLOCIR rLVIATION STREET L AT IN AND L VA SNOW LOCATION or WATER. SE -C-. GAS, It C C To ICAL ;.lRV:.C.9 IIMCI*INOW LOCATIONS or su*vcT P,"3, Owl" THE USE or CACH 60LOINCO EACH MAJOR AT ED ,.• .. . ... ....... rI INDICATE NORTH IN CIRCLE I EACH GRAPH SQUARE EQUALS 101-0" BY 100-0' ­ .. .- — — — —11." . *"_ I - F­T­l'_­, "T- ­ two Colify thill lhe prupoud co"trwionROI caftlom totimidlow,410mMIO Wan ONI—iibmerto thal nochamps-Ilbo .IW- «61houl TV ;c CIM ................ 00 ......... ........... ll` Iron ILHED APPADVED OY DATE I { a4' 1 m� t too -sq&( D v w- 9 ty; F q ab' S'ro�AGt WOLK �G.ostr To 8� RE,vwoa� NEui a6 XI � �OA/ ya' ae' �.4rZA6c W ,_ Planning Commission Agenda - 6/9/87 �. 5. Consideration to approve the final platting of a replotted lot to be known as Colony by the Greene Third Addition. Applicant. Jay 6 Vivian Miller. (G.A.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Mr. and Mrs. Jay Miller are proposing final platting of the replat of an existing residential townhouse lot in the Par Nest Addition. The proposed replatting of this existing lot will create eight townhouse lots with an outlot around these eight townhouse lots. The replotting of this residential lot into townhouse lots to be known as Colony By the Greene Third Addition does most all the minimum setback and square footage requirements of the Monticello City Ordinance. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Approve the final platting of a replat of a residential lot to be known as Colony by the Greene Third Addition. Z. Deny the request for final platting of a residential lot to be known as Colony by the Greene Third Addition. C. STAFF RECOMMENNDATION: Staff recommends approval of the final platting of a residential replotted lot into the Colony by the Greens Third Addition. The applicant has met the minimum requirements of the Monticello City Ordinance. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of the location of the proposed final platting request; Copy of the location of the final plat to be known as Colony by the Greens Third Addition. 4- db ----------- ----L----------------- \ I� N, \ . 1 f Consideration to ap o� he final j pletting;of ear iatt to be � —^j known as ''colo$y bythe G third Addition.; _ / Jay G viv Millar. / ----- — 6 T TZ[ 1 E IMIZ0% RNIE u LT1 rTT.�-. A UOLONY BY THE GREEN9 THIRD ADDITION E r�� r�� M -v1w u.. r •4 ..... M11. .41k III JERRYt1EF� - DRtYE / 8 trivarw A � 4 - o.w•rw'a'r �N'N'01'r Mm � M➢D Mao Nw • Mm Mm Mai M.GD i ' H $ rt r D �g / �8 r a� • � g$ vM04 G j MOO WIMM. OC _ MfA tW W MOO Mw I -Jaw 0r -m. R V A w ! 0 V8 G QP4 I L... –/ /ri/'prw ROAD -• E Council Minutes - 5/26/87 0. Consideration of Granting Approval to a Final Plat for Meadow Oak Fourth Addition. City Administrator Eidem introduced a proposal for the final plat of Meadow Oak Fourth Addition. He noted that Dickman Knutson, the owner/applicant had to be absent. Eidem noted that a staff meeting with Mr. Knutson had resulted in agreements on not only Meadow Oak Fourth Addition but previous conditions under Meadow Oak PUD. Eidem pointed out that all of Outlot H would be platted into the Fourth Addition, but the public improvements would be installed in two phases. He noted that the City had required the developer to accommodate all water retention on private property rather than on public rights of way, and further, the original grading plan proposed and submitted would need to be reinitiated. Councilmember Bill Fair inquired as to the potential development of a fifth addition prior to the completion of the public improvements in the Fourth Addition. Eidem noted that by agreement, and that the Council ought include it in their motion of approval, that no other platting shall occur on lands controlled by Mr. Knutson until phase two in Meadow Oak Fourth Addition is complete. Motion by Fran Fair, second by Bill Pair, and carried unanimously granting final approval to the final plat known as Meadow Oak Fourth Addition provided that: 1) the grading and drainage plan be restored to conform with the original grading and drainage plan submitted with the overall Meadow Oak plat; 2) a letter requesting discharge of the surface water from that area described as A-3 into a marshy area be drafted and submitted to the Wright County Board. The intent of the letter is to initiate final discharge permission into Ditch 33 for the southeasterly area of Meadow Oak; 3) Outlot H in its entirety shall be platted and recorded as Meadow Oak Fourth Addition. The developer shall provide to the City all the necessary plans, drawingo, specifications, and documentation as originally required in the Planned Unit Development approvals; d) construction shall be allowed to occur as follows: Stage I A) Street Construction The entire roadbed from Meadow Lana will be graded to the wont boundary of the plat. The area to the cant of the intorooction of Rod Oak Lane will be paved with curb and gutter. The intoroection of Red Oak Lane and the area to the went will be left in cubgrads condition, somewhat below final grade, but elevated above the surrounding low area so that no water will stand on the platted street right-of-way. Temporary blacktop spillways shall be built from the end of the curb and gutter on both the north and south video of Meadow Lane to direct the water to temporarily pond on Lot 1, Block 0, and Lot 8, Block I. Council Minutes - 5/26/87 8) Storm Sever No storm sever shall be required to be completed with the first phase other than the temporary storm ponding as mentioned under street construction, Item A above. C) Sanitary Sever The sanitary sever will be completed along Meadow Oak Lane to the intersection of Red Oak Lane. Construction shall include the manhole for access at the intersection of Red Oak Lane and Meadow Lane. All services east of Red Oak Lane shall be installed. D) Water Service The water system shall be completed along Meadow Lane until It can be terminated vest of the and of the paved street at a location defined by and acceptable to the City Engineer. Stage II Stage II shall consist of the remainder of all construction within Meadow Oak Fourth Addition, including grading, streete, water, sever, pathways, and storm sever draining the Fourth f� Addition. Much of the storm sever work is located in Outlot I which in under ownership control of another party. It is expected that Mr. Knutson will immediately pursue all necessary legal arrangemento so that the storm drainage construction can proceed as the Stage II construction commoncoe. Further, Stage II construction shall commence when the inventory of buildable lots is at ten or lees. Stage II of physical construction must commence and be completed before the Planning Commianion or City Council shall further consider the replat of any further additiono of outlota currently under Mr. Knutson -e control. 9) a atatoment clearly delineating the obligations of the dovelopor with reopoat to the public improvements in Outlot 0 shall be laid out in narrative form and in a document suitable for recording at tho Wright County Courthouse. 4Z2 Council Minutes - 5/26/87 , S. Consideration of Granting a Conditional Use for Minor Auto Repair in a B-6 Zone. Applicant, Jim Eisele. Zoning Administrator, Gary Anderson, made an initial presentation of Mr. Eisele's request concerning the desire to renovate an old ' building at the north half of Lot 1 in Block 12, property immediately f adjacent to the new fire hall. Anderson indicated that Mr. Eisele wanted to renovate old vehicles primarily as a hobby, although the project may develop into a business. He indicated that the Planning Commission had agreed to grant a conditional use for the renovation of the existing building, but the applicant was now requesting a new building, a proposal which had not gone before the Planning Commission. In addition, Mr. Anderson indicated that Mr. Eisele was requesting that he not be required to install sewer and water for a period of three years. Anderson indicated Eisele wished to install a holding tank until such time as the project actually turned into a business. Eidem, at this point, intervened and explained that he had not heard of this proposal but felt thet the proposal, as a principal use, required municipal utilities. Eidem attempted to explain that if the conditional use is granted as a principal use, then the utilities are required. If the utilities weren't going to be required, then the structure would have to be considered an accessory use, and therefore not permissible. Councilmember Blonigen indicated that that's what he identified as a problem with ordinances, namely, it prevents a person from working on his/her hobby. Mayor Grimsmo asked what would the holding tank be used for. Eisele indicated that it would be primarily to hold water and maybe spillage during working in the are:. He indicated that it would be disconnected when the city utilities ware installed. Mayor Grimsmo indicated that there didn't seem to be a problem and that it's the Council's job to operate outside of the ordinances if necessary. There was an inquiry of John Badalich as to the estimated cost of installing the sewer and water lines. Mr. Badalich indicated that very roughly it might cost $10 to $15 per foot to install each line. Councilmomber Fran Fair asked Administrator Eidem what would need to be done to make thio legal. Eidem indicated he didn't know. Councilmembor Bill Fair indicated that he was opposed to now construction in a B -a Zono not complying with utility ordinances. Bill Fair indicated that there might be other alternatives that could be evaluated that would allow for the project to happen but that he certainly couldn't veto in good conscience for something that clearly was illegal as defined by the City'o ordinances. At thio point, Mayor Grimomo indicated that it does seem inappropriate for the Council to vote for something that is illegal. Councilmember Fran Fair made a motion to approve a conditional use allowing for a minor auto repair service within a B -d Zone providing that all conditions as stipulated in the Monticello Zoning Ordinance are complied with, plus utility connections and flammable waste traps are installed as required. Motion was duly seconded by Councilmombor 8111 Fair, and was carried unanimously. r A� L I Cfl'Y OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA RESOLUn0N NO. 87-14 RESOLUTION RELATING TO $155,000 TAXABLE GENERAL OBLIGATION TAX INCREMENT BONDS, SERIES 19878, DETERMINING THE EXPEDIENCY OF ISSUING THE BONDS AND PROVIDING FOR THE SOLICITATION OF BIDS THEREFOR BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota (the "City") as follows: 1. Authorization. It is hereby found, determined and declared that it is necessary and expedient to the sound financial management of the City for the City to issue its taxable general obligation tax increment bonds for the purpose of providing funds to finance the capital and administration casts associated with the City's Tax Increment Financing Economic Development District i7 undertaken by the City pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.71 to 273.78.. 2. Sale Terms In order to expedite the sale of said bonds, the City Clerk -Administrator of the City, in consultation with Springsted Incorporated, bond consultant to the City, is authorized to prepare the circulate to one or more prospective bidden information relating to the terms and conditions of the bonds and relating to the financial condition of the City and to solicit bids from said prospective bidders for the purchase of the bonds. This Council shall meet on Monday, June 8, 1987, to consider bids for the purchase of the bonds and take such action thereon as is deemed appropriate. Afayor Attea erk-+1 trator ATI—' 43 CERTUnCATION OF NEWTES Municipality: City of Monticello, Minnesota Governing body: City Council Meeting: A meeting of the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota held on the 11th day of May, 1887, at 7:30 p.m. at the City Hall in the City of Monticello, Minnesota Members present: D. Blonigen, F. Fair, W. Fair b W. Smith Members absents A. Grimsmo Documents: A copy of a resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Monticello at said meeting. Certification: 4 Thomas A. Eidem, Clerk -administrator of the City of Monticello do hereby certify the following: Attached hereto is a true and correct copy of a resolution on file and of record in the offices of the City of Monticello, which resolution was adopted by the City Council, at the meeting referred to above. Said meeting was a regular meeting of the City Council, was open to the public, and was held at the time and place at which meetings of the City Council are regularly held. Member W. Fai; moved the adoption of the attached resolution. The motion for adoption of the attached resolution was seconded by Member D. Blonigen , A vote being taken on the motion, the following voted in favor of the resolution: All members present and the following voted against the resolution: None Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. The attached resolution is in full force and effect and no action has been taken by the City Council of the City of Montieello which would in any way alter or amend the attached resolution. Witness my hand officially as the City Clerk -Administrator of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, this lith day of May, 1987. ^ 1//I I � - City C1eril4dministrator r� 4- Planning Commission Agenda - 6/9/87 Additional Information Items 4. A request for open discussion of proposed sketch plan for unplatted property. Applicant. Rivera Financial and Development Corporation. Mr. Rivera has filed for a subdivision plat to be known as Highland Heights Addition and he will be back before the Planning Commission members at their July 14, 1987. Planning Commission meeting with a rezoning request, along with a request for preliminary plat approval of a subdivision to be known as Highland Heights Addition. .g. Council Minutes - 5/26/67 7. Citizens Comments. • Dennis Taylor of Taylor Land Surveying appeared on behalf of Mr. George Rivera, who is proposing a subdivision in the southwest part of the city. Mr. Taylor inquired as to whether or not the Council received the layouts he had mailed to them independently and requested any comments. Mayor Grimsmo noted that it appeared there was a request for rezoning, and such a request would require a hearing at the Planning 'Commission. He advised that Mr. Rivera should follow the proper method. Bill fair inquired if there wasn-t at least a portion that lies outside the city. Mr. Taylor responded that there are two phases to the proposal, to wit, phase one being that area within the city and phase two that area which in currently outside the city but would be included through annexation. Mayor Grimsmo asked if there were any comments from the Council. Councilmember Fran Fair indicated that there seemed to be nothing to properly comment on since it was not a formal proposal at this time. Mayor Grimsmo advised that the process as laid out by the ordinance be adhered to. Planning Commission Agenda - 6/9/87 q Additional Information Items 5. Annexation Update. (C.A.) They have concluded all the public hearings, and they will have up to two years for the Municipal Board to render their decision.