Planning Commission Agenda Packet 05-02-1995AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMIBBION
Tuesday, May 2. 1998 - 7 p m -
Members: Dick Frie, Jon Bogart, Richard Carlson, Rod Dragsten, Richard
Martie
1.
Call to order.
2.
Consideration of adopting agenda. Consideration of approval of minutes of
the special meeting held April 18, 1996.
3.
Public Hearing --Consideration of adopting an ordinance amendment
providing for interim uses. Applicant, Jay Morrell.
4.
Public Hearing --Consideration of adopting an ordinance amendment
establishing outside storage and interim use in I-1 and I-2 zones.
Applicant, Jay Morrell.
6.
Public Hearing --Consideration of granting an interim use permit to allow
outside storage and interim use at Lot 2, Block 3, Oakwood Industrial Park.
Applicant, Jay Morrell.
6.
Public Hearing --Consideration of a variance request to the side yard setback
requirement for driveway. Location: Block 23, Lots 8 and 9, Original Plat.
Applicant, Eugene Bauer.
r I 7.
Public Hearing --Consideration of a conditional use permit which would
allow two 3 -unit townhome buildings in an R-2 district. Location: Block 23,
Lots 7, 8, 9, and 10, Original Plat. Applicant, Eugene Bauer.
8.
Public Hearing --Consideration of a preliminary plat request to subdivide an
existing plat of residential lots into two 3 -unit townhome building lots into a
residential subdivision known as Pinehurst. Location: Block 23, Lots 7, 8,
9, and 10, Original Plat. Applicant, Eugene Bauer.
9.
Public Hearing --Consideration of amendment to the Monticello Zoning
Ordinance that would amend Chapter 3.9 (C) by changing the sign setback
from 16 R to 60% of the building setback applicable in the zoning district or
16 R, whichever is less. Applicant, Monticello Planning Commission.
10.
Adjournment.
NUNUTES
SPECIAL MEETING - MONTICELLO PI ANN1 NG C011011MON
Tuesday, April 18, 1998. 7 p.m.
Members: Dick Frie, Jon Bogart, Richard Carlson, Rod Dragsten,
Richard Martie
Stall. Jeff ONeill, Gary Anderson, Wanda Kraemer, Steve Grittman
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Dick Frie at 7:00 m.m.
2. f&n-ideration of ammroval of minutes for regular meeting held March 7.
I2•
RICHARD CARLSON MADE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE MINUTES
OF THE MARCH 7, 1995 MEETING. SECONDED BY JON BOGART.
Motion passed unanimously.
3. Nblic Hearing - Consideration of a variance request to the setback
£ninimums ghat would allow construction of a double -car Amm. Amulicant.
Dennis Anderson.
Gary Anderson, Building Official, explained that when the public hearing
notice was prepared and sent for publication, an encroachment into the
front yard setback should have also been included in the public hearing
notice in addition to the rear yard setback. However, the intent of the
public hearing notification requirement had been demonstrated via the
notice sent out, therefore no additional notice will be sent out.
The applicant is proposing to build an attached garage onto the front of his
existing garage, with its proposed location to be within 4 ft of the required
10 -ft side yard setback requirement and 22 ft 8 in from the required 30 -ft
front yard setback. Mr. Anderson's situation is somewhat similar to other
structures in the inner city in the Lower Monticello and Original Plat
additions where the house and/or garage were placed where they wanted to
place them on the lots. In Mr. Anderson' situation, the existing house and
garage were centered on the lot with no consideration for future expansion
of the garage. By today's standards, a single -car garage with 12 -ft width is
inadequate.
Anderson's house does line up with the other houses on the block.
Typically, when considering a variance request within a setback
requirement, especially a front yard setback, the closest one can come
forward with an addition in the front yard that is equal with the existing
houses on either We if they were the same or half the difDrence between
Page 1
O
Special Planning Commission Minutes - 04/18/95
setback of his residence and an adjoining residents on either side of him.
However, in Anderson's case he's proposing to come forward farther than
any of the houses in that block which is inconsistent with the ordinance and
there is no precedent for grunting this variance. The encroachment into the
minimum 10-R side yard has been allowed many times before by the
Monticello Planning Commission when it has been demonstrated that a
variance is necessary to enable development of a two car garage.
Chairman Frio opened the public hearing.
Dennis Anderson told the Commission that he bought the house originally
for a temporary place to live. His family likes the house and location so he
has started remodeling. The single -car garage is not big enough. There is
room in the back of his lot but the driveway would be expensive because of
the length. Anderson stated he would like the Commissioner's views.
Chairman Frie, inquired if there were any neighbors at the hearing with
input. The neighbors were not in attendance at the meeting.
Chairman Frio closed the public hearing.
The Commissioners discussed the variance and did not have a problem with
the side setback but the variance for the front setback would be a problem.
A front yard setback variance of this magnitude has never been granted in
the past. Granting a variance in this case would set a bad precedent and
impair the intent of the ordinance.
JON BOGART MADE A MOTION TO APPROVE A 6 -FT VARIANCE
REQUEST TO THE SIDE YARD MINIMUM SETBACK, WHICH WOULD
ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A DOUBLE CAR GARAGE BUT TO DENY
A 22 Fr 6 IN VARIANCE REQUEST TO THE FRONT YARD SETBACK
MINIMUM, WHICH WOULD ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A DOUBLE -
CAR GARAGE. MOTION TO APPROVE THE SIDE YARD VARIANCE
BASED ON THE FINDING THAT THE VARIANCE IS NECESSARY TO
ALLOW DEVELOPMENT OF A TWO CAR GARAGE. MOTION TO DENY
THE VARIANCE BASED ON THE FINDING THAT SIGHTLINE
PROBLEMS WOULD BE CREATED THUS AFFECTING THE SAFETY
AND INTEGRITY OF NEIGHBORHOOD AND THE BETTER CHOICES
FOR THE APPLICANT IS TO BUILD A DETACHED GARAGE IN THE
REAR. THEREFORE, AN OPTION FOR BUILDING A TWO CAR
GARAGE IS AVAILABLE AND NO HARDSHIP DEMONSTRATED.
SECONDED BY ROD DRAGSTEN. VOTING IN FAVOR: FRIE, MARTIE.
ABSTAINED: CARLSON.
Page 2
Special Planning Commission Minutes - 04/18/96
Public Hearing - CongideMUgn of a vWiange request to the side yard
setback reauirement for a driveway. Location is Lot 1. Block 2. Creekside
Terrace•
Subsequent to filing of application, the applicant withdrew this request
because the property sold.
Public Hearing - ConsideratioWj° an gunendment ,o a conditional use
permit allowing a garden center in a B-4 zoning district. Applicant. Cedar
Street Garden Center.
Steve Grittman, City Planner, explained that Cedar Street Garden Center
(Formerly "Fair's") had applied for an amendment to a Conditional Use
Permit originally issued to their predecessor "Fair's Garden Center" in 1989.
The purpose of the amendment is to relocate rock bins from the Broadway
frontage to the northeast corner of the site, currently devoted to equipment
storage. The rock bins would be replaced with additional parking. No other
changes are proposed at this time. Amendments to Conditional Use
Permits are processed as if they were new applications. The amendment to
the garden center Conditional Use Permit is an opportunity to remove an
incompatible use fiom the Broadway Street frontage, in addition, the
expansion of the off-street parking should serve to reduce congestion in the
area during peak season of use, and reduce the potential for adverse
impacts from unpaved areae in and near the Central Business District.
Gnttman also discussed Cedar Street Garden Center's freestanding sign
which is situated in a non -conforming location adjacent to the Broadway
Street right of way. The Monticello Zoning Ordinance requires a setback for
such signs of fifteen feet firom the property line. Modification of the sign
will likely be proposed by the new operators to reflect the name change.
According to staff information, the sign was not granted any special
permission to be located within the required sign setback. As such, the
location of this sign would need to be addressed in order to be able to make
a finding that the proposed Conditional Use Permit will meet the standard
of the Zoning Ordinance, a typical factor in the City's consideration of such
permits. There are three possibilities which the Planning Commission may
wish to consider.
The sign be relocated to meet the required fifteen foot setback.
It may require the elimination of one of the perking spaces.
A variance from the sign setback requirements. A variance
will require a finding of special conditions relating to a non -
Page 3
Special Planning Commission Minutes - 04/18/95
economical physical hardship which would otherwise preclude
compliance with the performance standards.
An amendment to the sign regulations relating to freestanding
sign setbacks. There may be some justification in this
alternative in that which freestanding signs are required to be
set back fifteen feet from the right of way, building can be
constructed with a zero setback in this zoning district. Tying
the sign setbacks to building setbacks may be reasonable
approach which the Planning Commission should discuss.
Frie opened the public hearing
Leslie Delis4 owner of Cedar Street Garden Center, told the Commission
that all the requirements on the Conditional Use Permit would remain the
same except for moving the bins. The reason for moving the rock bins was
for site appeal from Broadway and to improve the traffic flow in the parking
lot.
Also, Delisi has been wonting with a sign company as changing the current
sign and would like the Planning Commission to dHrect her on this issue.
Chairman Frie closes the public hearing.
Jeff O'Neill, Assistant Admini trator, stated that there is a need to address
the setbacks for pylon signs and suggested a public hearing be called for on
this issue because it is not limited to the Garden Center's sign but other
signs in this area as well.
DICK MARTIE MADE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE AMENDMENT TO
THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT BASED ON THE FOLLOWING
CONDITIONS:
THE GARDEN CENTER DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE
WITH ALL PREVIOUSLY IMPOSED CONDITION OF THE
ORIGINAL CUP ISSUED IN 1989.
THE AREA FROM WHICH THE ROCK BINS ARE BEING
REMOVED IS TO BE PAVED AND CURBED, PER
ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR COMMERCIAL
PARKING LOTS AND PER THE EX3PECTATION OF THE
1989 PERMIT APPROVAL.
Page 4
Special Planning Commission Minutes - 04118/95
THE AREA SURROUNDING THE NEW ROCK BIN
LOCATION IS DETERMINED TO BE ADEQUATELY
SCREEN AT PRESENT, OR ADDITIONAL SCREENING
EFFORTS ARE REQUIRED.
MOTION BASED ON THE FINDING THAT THE AMENDED
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT IS CONSISTENT OR IMPROVES ON
THE ORIGINAL CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT. SECONDED BY
RICHARD CARLSON. Motion passed unanimously.
RICHARD CARLSON MADE A MOTION TO CALL FOR A PUBLIC
HEARING ON THE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS OF PYLON
SIGNS IN THE B4 ZONING DISTRICT. SECONDED BY JON
BOGART. Motion passes unanimously.
6. Public Hearing - Consideration of adopting an ordinance amendment
providing for interim uses. Applicant Jay Morrell.
7. Public Hearing - Consideration of adopting an ordinagce amgndmgnt
establishing outside storage as an interim uses. Applicant. Jav Morrell.
8. hiblig Hearing - Considerajion of granting an interim Use nerinit to allow
outside storage as an interim use at Lot 2. Block 3. Oakwood Industrial
applicant. Jav MoUln.
These three items were not published by the Monticello Times; therefore,
the public hearing cannot be held at this time on these three items and
must be continued to the next meeting.
A. Steve Grittman, City Planner, explained the next phase of the
Comprehensive Plan will involve a summary of the issues developed
in the Tactics and Inventory phases. The effort will be to distill the
information gleaned from the physical inventory and the
informational interviews into usable data on which the City can make
decisions. For instance, one of the most thoroughly discussed issues
in the Tactics interviews was the community's housing supply. There
is a wide range of issues associated with housing, all of which will
require the City to set a defined path throughout goals, objectives,
and policies. These include the range of housing choices in the
community, the range of housing growth, types of housing, active or
passive involvement of the City in housing development, issues
Page B
O
Special Planning Commission Minutes - 04/18/98
relating to affordable housing, and other demographically defined
issues such as senior housing.
The next step in the Comprehensive Plan would be to schedule a joint
workshop with the City Council, HRA, Parks Commission, and
Planning Commission.
DICK FRIE, CHAIRMAN, MADE A MOTION TO MEET WITH THE
HRA AT THEIR FIRST AVAILABLE MEETING TIME AND
DISCUSS THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, TAX INCREMENT
FINANCING, AND THE CITY/SCHOOL DISTRICT EFFORTS TO
COORDINATE FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT. SECONDED BY
ROD DRAGSTEN. Motion passed unanimously.
B. Receive an update on the status of the ordinance amendment
regulating pole buildings in the business campus and business
district.
Jeff O'Neill, Assistant Administrator, reported on the status of pole
buildings in the Business Campus and Business District. He directed
the Planning Commission to decide if the pole buildings issue should
be studied in the comprehensive plan process or if the Planning
Commission is concerned about the possibility of pole buildings to be
built this year.
The Commission discussed the pros and cons of pole building
construction and decided this issue would best be handled through
the comprehensive plan process. They would like Steve Grittman to
develop five or six statements that could be looked at during the
workshop sessions.
C. Review Shadow Pines development proposal.
Jeff O'Neill, Assistant Administrator, informed the Planning
Commission that this is just an informational report so as the
comprehensive plan is developed this area is addressed It is a 40
acre site south of Oakwood Drive West and West of Highway 25 in
the urban service area which is relatively easy to annex. The
development of this area would not be until about 1998 but there is
still the problem of the waste water treatment plant.
Tom Holthouse, Value Plus Homes, described the development to be
comparable to the Par West area townhomes. There would be a
combination of four -unit upper scale townhomes and upper scale
Page 6
Special Planning Commission Minutes - 09(18!95
single family homes. The ares is zoned for business now and would
need to be rezoned to residential. Holthouse suggested this be looked
at during the comprehensive planning process because the location is
a distance from Highway 25 and might be better served as a
residential area.
Dan Fria, Wright Sherburne Realty, this development was also shown
to the Industrial Development Committee with regards to an
industrial park south of this development. One of the main reasons
this was brought to the meeting was for information on the waste
water treatment schedule. Would it be advisable to continue with the
development plans or wait?
O'Neill noted that the land use questions relating to the Shadow
Pines development area will be a major topic to cover as part of the
comprehensive plan update process. As part of the proceea, the City
will be seeking input ti9m the developers as well as input from the
IDC and others interested in creating the beat possible mixed land
uses in the area
The Planning Commission at this point could not give direction to
the development of Shadow Pines until there is a decision from the
City Council regarding the study of the wastewater treatment plant's
capacity. There was concern that the area surrounding the
development is zoned industrial and commercial and might not be the
ideal location for a residential development but this could be studied
during the comprehensive plan process.
D. Discuss Planning Commission involvement in preparation of an
updated capital improvement plan and consider providing input on
HRA/City Council use of pooled TIF funds.
O'Neill reported that the HRA is in the process of developing a TIF
plan for utilization of pooled Ands. This plan must be reviewed by
the Planning Commission for consistency with the comprehensive
plan. He noted that the Planning Commission could provide input of
the TIF plans as part of the up coming joint meeting.
E. Update: City/School District efforts to coordinate facilities
development.
Jett O'Neill, Assistant Administrator, reported that a committee of
Dick Fria, Planning Commission Chairman; Clint Herbst, City
Page 7
O
Special Planning Commission Minutes - 04/18/95
Council; Bruce Theilen, Parka Commission Chairman, and Jeff
O'Neill, Assistant City Administrator, met with the school district on
the coordination of the joint facilities development. The school
district was open to discussion with the City but at this point was
still in the preliminary stages. The next meeting would be April 26th
at 7:00 p.m. After the joint meeting, May 3rd, with the City Council,
Planning Commission, Parke Commission, and HRA a better direction
from the City could be taken.
10. Review conditional use hermit enforcement issues.
Jeff 0' Neill, Assistant City Administrator, in the past the city has been
handling conditional use permit enforcement issues on a case by case basis
when is a complaint. It is impossible at this time for the staff to spend
adequate time in this area because new construction has taken priority.
One thing that could be done is an inventory of the problem cases that the
Planning Commission could go through.
The Planning Commission requested staff to assemble a list of enforcement
issues of current conditional use permits.
it !lir_ _ • '.r-T-1M.1-M.L 1.' • . !L-l'l-1 M7.7",
Orrin Thompson requested the city and township to tour the area they are
looking into developing. Even though the wastewater treatment plant
might force a moratorium on new construction the commissioners thought
this would be a worthwhile trip. The date for the tour is tentatively set for
May 24th, this day would be kept even if the township does not attend.
11H. -IN r.TrWAir---71s1±
Steve Orittman, City Planner, explained that the Chamber of Commerce is
proposing to display a permanent reader board at the intersection of State
Highway 25 and Broadway. The sign would be three -sided, 10 feet high,
and located in "court yard" area on the side of the chamber building. The
Chamber would contract with a person who makes signs, there would be no
administration by the chamber. The fee for advertising on the sign would
be approximately $26. It to an off premiss sign that would need an
ordinance amendment to allow.
Page 8
O
Special Planning Commission Minutes - 04/18/95
The Planning Commission discussed the reader board and decided that the
idea was good but the design proposed at that location was not the best.
The sign location could cause viability problems when turning, the sign
location would be hard to read while driving by, and would not enhance the
courtyard effect that the Park's Commission recommended for the corner.
The Planning Commission directed the Chamber of Commerce to act within
the current ordinance that does allow an elevated pylon sign or wall sign.
Steve Grittman, City Planner, introduced Rchard McLaughlin, Northwest
Consultants, to the Commission. If Grittman is unable to attend a Planning
Commission meeting Mr. McLaughlin would attend in his place.
18. Adiournment
DICK MARTIE MADE A MOTION TO ADJOURN THE MEETING.
SECONDED BY JON BOGART.
Respectfully submitted,
Wanda Kraemer
Development Services Technician
Page 9
O
Planning Commission Agenda - 6/=
1-71 Tt-!TTTC
PuNe Headnp-C ndderation of ado nd" an ordinance
amendment estabLehina outside stomas and interim nee in I.1 and
H noses. AnnHcant Jas Morrell AND
Please see the attached report Brom City Planner Steve Grittman.
RPR-13-1995 1602 NRC 612 595 9837 P.05/12
JrN Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc.
C URBAN P L •MMI M 6 -01310% • M A R K a T RIESMARCH
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Jeff O'Neill
FROM:
Ridwd MCT caghlin/Stephen G>ittman
DATE
13 April 1995
RE.
Maw - Interim Use Ordimam
Paz NO:
191.06 -95.03
BACKGROUND AM REFERENCE
Racemly, the City has bees appmsehed by a Lndawmr (Mr. V Moael0 It, am the along,
of Www and teaihn on an mdaaoW pi rcd as a p dn*al m of pioMty. The T.oniog
Otdim m dw not aaarilly have s=b a use, and the higbM and best use of this pared is
Beady a moi, hm=e bWusU al user. However, a tpecifie use may be q Ip S oaate for a limited
dmo until the aitimsse use an be m"z,d Ibis meeuonodum will omltae the cddw factor
which eom ml hard- uses and allow for their enactive imply.
ANALYSIS OF ALTEtMTXM
Carseat Conditlom lar City of blamicielo Z=ing Onibmce don am bave say and
conditions for IMMAM asn within tp%ft zmft dimiQs. A moms by a indowaer of
an indasaW pa cd to uw the had Nr adhnr thea the permitm I or eond>tiand wan gxdfed
baought to the +mead- of the City the poubility of acco=odadog uses+ of Lad an a tmrporary
bads. If it Can be shown that the no was to inoosr>padbk with the wan of aanotmding
pmpardes, or conflict with the fang tam developumm famr speci&d by the City's
C=Vmbmdve No. as fatedm use gVomh May be appaoprtaoe
In light of thn rmmt nqueu, the City OWN choose to deny the appy, peamtt the Ute
through an o1dbum amradmmt, or immdnce iraft uan. This report .-- .... ......... j an
addidoa to the 74dag Orditmate, Vecifleatly the Admbdsmdion swdm ad the Buinen
Dinner Pmvtdoaa socslw. Subd. 16, I-2. Hoary IrdUsnfal, to indole ........ Criteria
ICgarding the ImpkmenWon of fated- UM
5775 Wayzata Blvd. - Suite 555 • St. Louis Park. MN 55416 • (812) 595.9836 -Fax. 595-9837
APR -13-1995 16:92 IHC
Purpose and Intent. 7U andedyiq putpose of allowing a spedfic use within. a designated
zoning district is to ensure the ow= d a specific parcel, ncaghbortag property owners, and the
City, a pmdimble level of advby aid impact expected from use of that specific parcel. For
this reason, no rases are allowed other than those opacified by the Zoning Ordinance as
Pte. may, of oomditiotn1.
On occasion, however, the City may discover oestrin urea for a property which ass temporary
in nature, serve a ipecific faction in a designated location, and offer Hale, if my, detameatai
effects m neighboring lendowtms. la the nae of a particular use on a sped8c property anal
a permanent location for tbu use own be found, or a use which will be replaced with auticipamd
development or---.. 9 ,, coLfb=tng to the permitted, accessory, or conditional nerd of
the zoning district, or a use mflearve of the long mage development goals of the area, aflowft
that an on a trmporary bads may be a bcndlcW development stratm. In inch cases. all
parties rt>copize the Warpoury mutt of such a use, and that at —d—fan of the interim use
permit, the specified use will termiatte, —d as otherwise reinstated by the City.
Procedure and Comaal Standardis With tgprd to processing of htterim Use permits, there
aro two conditions which apply. The first is a 'gmndfadwdng• condition, in which an ercisdng
lgd or legal ., i., .,.',,,;, fntetiim use is oonsidered allDwabb and crated troordkg m the
existing standards and as eco interim sae in a spocitied =rig diatdct lie second condition is
when a new Merit use, allowable in the zoning district as etch, is applied for. Under such
a Utaation the application it Ie 1 ere 1 similar to the procedures noel standards associated with
a conditional use pensrit to ensure tlbm riot gdty of the use to the specified zoning district and that
the use will not Impose any eddidoml burden an the City or neighboring properties.
Termh adon. Pwhaps the most 8pdicant component of an Interlin use is Its epaifled
tetminatlaa. Without a omminallon date. a specified land use is uodernwd to be permanent,
whether it Is a pe®ined or con0c ml use in the district. R may be that a vklatfon of the use
pesmb conditions, a change in the City's Zoning OrdWince, or redeveloper of the use
property tender the haterim use permit tamisamd berme the spedl9ed termination dam.
However, bar fag sad ecediti=. the psopmty owner can expect the h—hn use pewit to
aVW on a specified data At that time, continued activity on sari a property would be
canUdered anon -conforming and po s ty Mqd. unless otherwise spedtiad by the City.
lurterbu Use b an LtdosarW Tmfin{ Dfarkt. The City of Monticello is currently contideriag
a request by a landowner to paovM outdoor atmage of trucks and trucking egttipment an a
parcel zoned for iadustrtd bvebpmxzL To address this request. as well as any others whirb
may be applied to the I.2 Zmiag Dhtrkt, the ftiodammnl purpose of the zo tog district const
be preserved.
The fhndsmeaW purpose of the 1-2 Dlatrfa is to provide building Uta for heavy fumundal
activity ranoved from the less inleadve activity of nnideudd and commercial land Uses.
Outdoor storage of vehiclm and e"mew does cot connimte the Millett and best use of this
prowtY. However, boranse a via = indutrW ht may be the mast sppop dm pisco to some
C?
RPR -13-1995 1602 WAC 612 t�'b Iv8Se r.l7riu
vehicles and equipman until a more suitable site is located, an hm-im use permit for dds
purpose may be considered a desirable ahetoadve to leaving the land vacant until an im�gzal
building and use is proposed for the sate.
An interim use permit for outdoor storage of trucks and trucking equipment should imbude rim
following conditions:
1. The permit. would be camded to the ptopaty owner for a maltimnm um of yarn
agreed span by the landowner and tie City under a u..,.,.,,.:,.,. nun. W. At
texudoadon the landowner may apply for another im-Im use permit However, both
rho landowner and the City will be requited to assess ria ..., .,,, ,,,i watmn of the
application, and detedfae wbether gouning another imrim use permit is in the best
intoes of the City and nald boring property owners.
2. The iotedm one permit would require the appliaat to meet the appiinble
Of Chapmer 3, Section 2, General and Mbimacm A.., r:'....,,.,,. , similar to ft
requiremea necessary to receive a conditional use permit in this disoim
3. The I use pormit would include as a conffition of approval ptddddog parkin g of
automobiles.
4. The immim use permit would req*c a gravel aufaoe, suitable for otmdotr somM% and
tciafordog the eempmmy nous of the use on this site.
S. The iotedm use pe:mic would regntee visual taeeatog In compliance wkb Chapmer 3,
Section 2.d of the Zoning Ordance regar tag fcm tog, landscatog, and scretmtog. Of
Particular significance is the screening's opacity and use of aataral via otmg as a
component of the screening. The anent of the s=wing sad necessary lnve mem by
the landowner should be at the discretion of the City. However, the —dm— agreed
upon doold be documented as a compoamc of the Issued permit.
6. The Interim use permit would toga', any hndng and storage of trucks and eqt
to comply with the suck amWk ons of Chapter 3, Section 3 of the City's Zonfng
Ordinance. Icor the '42' Zoning Disma, an fencing and coup shall have a 30 foot
mfnimnm h m and res yard wftck, and 30 fact -Intn— side yard s bwJcL
Mm coudidoos mmtlonod above apply to the specific m of arodoam storage for ntrcly and
teueldog egtd=— If the City finds there are other types of storage uses to be fsohrded fa tics
section, spedflC conditions may be required of them a well. However, tie general immt of
keeping vfsuallyr attractive, non-obttoalve toad uses wipdr the b dusodol dis der should be
p -
FPR -13-199.5 1603 NRC 612 595 5337 P. U6, 12
In mpom to the City of Mondccllo's fm- in cabUs all i»oeaam um oomponast to thdr
Taming Ofdi m=. our offim hags shafted sock all ordknmw. 'his ordinance Serb to aatldpate
;. ,. !. of the City to t xdd ao xWm which wm= an imedm to
pamait, wb& an the same time g potemial adv= dfam of to am on the diatdd
is which they ace allowed. The City should esta6Nsh the eve wmpoaem of the
imean rue permit procadane, sub that interim um may be humdsd is nxHvt&d naming
dimft when the teed as deaim is wasted.
Under the Chy's Toning Oxftm oe, the PLooimg Cammisdan is to condda five Actoes in hs
anddamdon of an ammdmet The Phud q Coanmissim b to tbam maim a fiodrag of fad and
.... ... —I.. I I.:1.1" i to the city Council mgavft the pmpomd ameadatm lbs Svc hmn ate
U follows
L 1Rdatiamft to to C „ „., s..... . Pim
Tk ha-irn on of outdoor sman for trucks aatd tmddng eqnbmmt, if k athletes to the
o=dWons dewrUnd in the as0mce, will mppo:t the imemioe of the
Plan to m amaative, f nimaml h>dssoeial park in MamtlaIlo.
L Geogmphk area invahed in the ragnsst.
C
The outdoor storage of uucb and ttacffig cquk=em is aompatihle with the otdsaty
acdvides of the iodoa dal pmt in whkh the hmedm nae is pmpored.
J. ?mdew of the proposal to deptechft lite as+am.
It b highly tmliimly tbat the pmpaamd use foUminS nogadted cmddm for aappaoval wM
depeedate the van of aaighbathtg psopeetin is the Z-2•, Envy bdustdd Zamisg
Mot=
4. Charaada of the aaottooadiq aces.
The htcadm for the proposed intedm me hu the tuck =dvity ad amoamory outdoor
anlage typhal of Medal part. The huhulon d an attcdaoc smrago an is typhal
of indaurial parks. The hadmdam of an outdoor asaatsge hCa ty dodintad to taurks and
buck ng equIpmm is highly can p 2b whh the chasm of the alas.
S. II ......... 1 goad for tits am
The laodoa m bas . ........... .. l as insdWa t mm on the edrdsg lot bcb* used Ibr
tr wkWg bulmaa mdvity. 7berdm, aditmd Lod ibir ammage of tro I ad troeidag
equipattamt would alloy pea n udhy of the imdoamath hrt whh a pan nftd am.
4
RPR -13-1995 1683 NAC bll b'» xW r.rniu
In reviewing the rtquu by W. Mo=14 the Clay has due aption for :
F1114 dw City may 0110050 to deny the regent, usefog a fiodiegs of A= which Elates the
p oposed use is not is the best iatetest of the Qty or adjacent isndownem. lie City may
de=mim mat it is is tbair best b to pursue a pozmaoaat rase sad bailmag A, d.,,.......
program for the paoperty, and to leave the land vacaat uadl such time a pemtincd at conditional
land use is proposed.
Second, the C:y may choose to do6ae the proposed use u a permitted or comdidand use in the
'1-2' Zoafmg UsUict, issuing a find iioga of met which states the proposed an 13 desi n and
nm"b=Jve in this dintict an a petmaot bash. lie City may determine that i storage of
MmIcs and uuddng eadon m is compatilito with the iinmdal dame er of the district and
t1eae6 in the best iota" of the City, this use may be chuifiaed as peumlued at eoadWmaL
Finally, the City may choose to dedfoe the tegaeat as an interim use In the 1I-2'. Induguhl
Morlm In this case, the muting chsAficathm would ... �m a speehl a� .... ... .... of
oemporary moue. This action would have the et%et of pemtitdag a use an a psoparty wbkb
Would ordinarily remain vaunt oadl a petmat<m. use could be established. Mote gmdflcdiy,
the potendal to use a site in an endAishmd iodasmial diauits for the scourge of tincts and
ttuCkft equfDomt M% would the tcMp=y needs of the landowner wftboat
povWing adverse impact to the City or adjacent landowners.
It is the r.".,. of our office to adopt an otdioanee which perju IsUrtm aces in
zoning dish, provided they ate developed and maintained for m "buttdve activities. In
addition, our office ., the hoelusim of outdoor storage for, sad tsuddng
egodpaaena as an fated- use in the Z-2'. Heavy loduebtl Zoning District.
To tilt end. we have p ovidcd a Draft Otdioaoce in -tee sections for the Qty's mvlaw. Tim
rim section amends the dde of Chapoer 22 of the MomdeeQo Zoning Ordttmnoe to b chide
Lmeatm Qtes. Tim smooad section amends Chapter 22 to fxhde the admiadmadoa of ituerim
oma s000tding to the Moemkelto Zoning Otdiamoa. The mind mcdon &meads Chsptar 16.-1.
21. Heavy IaduWfal Mulct smoduds to Include outdoor amtage of uur]m and uukbS
eooipmeat, and the oemdhtfons under which It tiny be smoved.
it is our bmmdm by puvvidlog the previcm roue dismulon and me Draft Otdimoce mat the
City of Monticello wM have the n ecemty ioformaarinn by which an effective revoose may be
dellvemd to Mr. MoadPs requen
FPR -13-1995 1604 NAC old. » �, r.-1.
DRAFT . DRAFT - DRAFT
OBDINMCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE ACING TIlE ADbID1 STRATZVE SECTION OF TEM
MONiTICK[J.O ZONING MINANCE TO INCLUDE AN ADBC04 SMTM
PROCESS PROVIDING FOR IN1MW USE PZMff S.
TBE C[IY COUNCII. OF Tm CTTY OF MONTICE= DOES EMRMY ORDAIN:
Sfsdm31. The iYt1e of 22 of die Motttlodlo Zoaiog Ordinam be an=ded to
tnd: Admbimadam - Am -d,—. Condidoml UN Pte, ad Interim Use Permits.
SWUML Secdm 33.41 fateaim Use Permit, be added to Chapter 22, A -
Ameodmc=, Coadldoml Use Permits, and IatWm Use Aermfta of the MonelCelo Zmft
OnUnanw to read as follows:
22.4 ENTERIM USE PERNoW
A PURPOSE AND D TIii M The pug= and iamm of allowing fatedm usw W
1. To allm a on for a bd d pettfod d dw Hord a permanent foeall m is obtained
or wwk ft pct l =l= is ottder mmetetlon.
2. by the City Cotm % tart that
with aodcW=d tL .......,.,, or mdavelopmmot. Will sot be aCooptable In the
florae of arm be upbsoed in the tmn by a petmfed or oo ndki nal ase allowed
whtrin toe tetpeotive flame,
3. To aloes a me wbkh L aftdve of aodabmd Ioag tsmge change to as am and
whkb is in nue wttb dte C....... ,,., t, . PLn provided that am rue
uwlmWuhuuxMuWcompatWkywM=n=mft uses sad L ha beeping with
the awlbcmtal chm= and dedp staff of edsdag uses ad develmment.
FPR -13-1995 1604 NRC blt X= `JbJ( r.iiiic
B. PROCEDURE:
1. Existing Use Uses defined as ime m rue which pteuady erdst as a legal an
or a legal non oonfaaming use within a respective riming dist la shall be
cow approved and sball be treated u allowable uses.
2. New Use: Uses defined u httrsim nae whkh do not paesendy edit within a
tespeatve mmiaa dhada dial]. be pmocessed to the naodetda and
procedures for a coaditioml use permit as etablished by Section 22 of this
Ordinance.
C. GEMAL STANDARD& An ioses>m use doll comply with the fallowing:
I. Br3ating Use: Shall be in cankmance with zoning and bmildbsg standards in
effort at the time of iridal constracdan and davelopmt and shall core to be
governed by sash tegalsdom in the ane.
2. New Use:
L Mew the standards of a confitional use permit net foal to Section 22-3
of this Chapter.
b. Confbrrns to the eppiirable aft in [oath In 3.
Section 2, of this losing Ordinance.
C. Mw use is allawad as an h-rhn use In the nmpm&e toting dlsttfct
d. The dace or even; that will termtrwte the use can be idmdfied with
may
C. The ore will oras impose tddMwA oosta on the public if it L neoatsuy for
the public to Wm the pmpcm in the !bete.
E The uta agnea to any coodhlam that the City Cwswfl dmw appmpotiete
for pestuisabm of the rue.
D. TERMINATWN: An ltnedm nae d all tetmbmte on the hoppesioa cf any cf the
fallowing ev=h whiehm flts ancon:
1. The date sated in the permit.
2. Upon vloladw of conthdoaa unba which the permit was famed.
2
,Y
APR -13-1996 16:04 -Nuc - - --- - 612- s9s 9Hsr a: 12/12 �
3. Upon dtange in the City's wHng tegulstions which readers the use mo-
g.
4. The .: 1— 11...,,,,,,. of tbt use and property upon whk h it Is loomed to a pertained
or tonal use as allowed within the mgecttm aonlog &Uict.
Section 3. Section 16-5, Itmedm Uses, be added to Chspser 16, -1-2-, Heavy ladusmal
Dispiet, to mad s Wow
1" AgTiiM UMM: The following are itumfm uses to as 112' Distdct Oegohas as
iatedm use permit bused an the Iraes at forth In sad ttsgolated by (2taptec 22 of
this Osie):
A. Outdoor amp of trucks and trucdgg agatpmeza, provided that
1. A spoaifled tomfu9cm date is doameoled.
2. She gob=e , ,,,,.,.....,,,. ad C'Itsater 3, Section 2, Goad >
ate toot.
3. The pemit putt the patkiag of maa®obiles.
4. The Penh specbHes a gravel mdke, nimble for the padobtg of trucks.
S. The permit spedsiea visual succulag
6. The permit =CWes the sppaopdste es fentdgg aid storage in
compiimae wbh Chapmer 3. Socdm 3 of Ondinamm and drat these
sem ate dearly designated an the sato to be Wmved.
IAO S/
3
rNAM 13-1995 1622 NPC 612 595 9M P.01
Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc.
Cj Ya9A M PLAMMI Mn • DESIGN • MARKET KtSGA RCM
bEEMRANDUM
TO: Monticello
FROM ]RI =6�1
DAIS 13
MOodeQIID - r—m* site plan
PRE NO; 191.06- 95.03
Attached please find an eonnlple of a doe plan for ft ptopaty b&g ¢amddaed for nae u an
01 storage ales for ttucb am1 UUCk ag COW=. Among the faa+rea ea p cmd on a doe
AM are:
1. Lot dhnmainmt
2. Aman of vdbde nom laehodiog Wm
3. Miaimnm wed setbacb
4. Rn mt of mrbaoed aria
S. parldog W&W tnstesial
6. Fandog, tocbft detail of type of bendag to be us4 sorb m mWog graphic
7. Scsminspbmwg typa iQaIffled
g. D:atmtgo p mm
9. Otber bnmm load at to ette aloe.
We flops fibs undo the appH= In pavvi ft the City the necasaty .%- , ,1,, , fan• ef8dmt
evaht d= of the mmoaed pr*m
Sho m you flaw aq "emwm, plmae 00.
5775 Wayzata Blvd • SLdte SSS • St. Lour Park, W4 55416 • (612) 595.SM-Fax. 595
�-98.'+7
I
WR -13-1995 16=22 NAC
t
T 300'
-612 5% 9537 P.02
�uNpR� mil bop
`�,,,• �}uess
t'Pta4dV,
9ar�,r.� rrx,d�al
m
s,.
J
'540,"LE Sire 'Ram
KA
A1e:47 NAC 612 595 9837 P.B2/06
Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc.
C URBAN PLANNING - DESIGN - MANKRT HISEARCH
iT:+.TT1)�Ia Zi
M. MOatlO0U0 Planning Caonniuioa
FROM Stephen GdM=
DAM Ap 9 28. 1993
REL, Moadoft - Iatrim Use Otte Ammdmeat
FILE NO: 191.06 -95.03
Ibis memoraodum L invaded os salve u a applemeot to our report of 13 April 1993. TIM
Planning Cammialoo hu narrate obligstiOm i4 thO omn8den don of a Zoning Or Wanoe
ate. Dae . 'ol.. ,c,.,. mum be Shea to 8ve 1ltctms, among others, which am
snmmarimd an page 4 of that neporL Vpoa . , ., ;',ti,,, of these iltCam the Phoning
Comb to bele its —. „.,,,....'atlon on speel90 dogs of tact. Our 13 Apd1 report
s®mad>ss those poalble findim and abema lvee, and do have reprodooed thorn below for your
Ah m dm 1.7Ibe Planning CommWlon may mow to de" the aqua for an Owe
sad for an In - - Use plecmit under any such Ordinmoe.
FW&W a nWm 4fDedd-
7be proposed ase is not in rho best iotenat of the City God hs
.1'b ).
7be proposed me b not In the best immea of the saaonndiog laodowoen.
A pannat>ms ase b do spprapetste use of inMulal peeperty, and an totedm
no would totedme whh that e4Octive.
5773 Wayzata Blvd. - Suite 555 - St. Louts Park- MN 55416 - (612) 595.9836 -Fax. 395-989
3��
FFR -20-1996 1047 W 612 995 9037 P.03i06
Ai'ii mdm 2. The Plmsiog Comatisdoo tray move to teoommmd an Otdmaaoe ameadmmt to
�. allow outdoor amrtsof naris and tttulsiog equi mmM 6a ao Inmrim Use as
permit,. or condition saes to the I-2 Distim
pbwkp a nopm 014 PVMMM m &&MdAtd or
. ibe stmage of ttttc' and tttaddoig etpd� m the I-2 D3ateiet b dedahle aad
aompatihlo with mmrommeling ass (wft main merl8ed eoedt omo. ad in fhM
ambaon the U tyr of the dw t as an haduattiai ama.
ibis ahs>mtive wasid =qWm the oondhlm that the epPHcant supply an appsopntate and
oostfomtog site phtn ibr the me of the pa and in gm000.
Akvn&*# J. Tho Phmbg Comsais m may move to nwommmd as Ozd}aame amendment to
allow the otaWw sa=p of tttseb and UmWS egttWm= as an Iometim Use in
mo I.2 Dlatdet sad to brans sorb a pemit to me applicant.
Pblew in sappm opm ! "O f las:
ibe emp of WcIm and ttaddag mpdvom to the I-2 D 19d t Is amr r i tI I as
a tt+mposaty me of psopmty tants such then as ib highest and beat ase of pmpetty
dit=u odxzwiso.
t- An Iamdm Use apym ch wadd ptamlt the Cfty to control the mom dory of nts
of oatloar omp ar w& o to wast with the psWmty owom ttatvud the evemd
o mOm of the tm mV6 tend a pets mm tate of the property.
Lim AlmmOm 2. ft tppzomb wetild tithe a aandithm anaclu d to any pe mit approval mat
the appl = wM sq* an ameptable and aoalbamI , tdte phm.
3-S
Planning Commission Agenda - bl?J9b
8. Public Searina--Consideration of an amendment to the Monticello
Zoning Ordinance that would amend Chanter 3.8 (Q by Phan
the sign setback from 15 It to 60% of the 11x11
in the sowing district or is it whicbevPr is lees. Anakant.
Monticello Planning Commission (J.O.)
Please see the attached report fiom City Planner Steve Grittman.
PFR -28-1995 1048 WC 612 595 9837 P.04/06
FAC Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc.
URBAN PLANNING • 0 9 8 1 0 9 • N a N K I T MESSARCH
MMORAMUM
1�
F94M Smphm Clan
Dara: 27 Apuri1199S
R& MudceDo - Pme sftdiq Sip R=Mdm to the B4 Direst
Fm 10. 191.06
RAIMMMMM
At it tact ataetainp, the Plm da Camtobdm dbcoaaod the Woe of the
Bttxet uft Wp at the Ceder Stmet (index Ceaater. 1n tut tttpoet on the Ondw Ccomes
Caed[tlmal Un Rama mmWldmeeath was a8sed it ft tJp soft* . , , L. fn the R 4
Dtatdet vete i000eaalaor� wlm the � atabatie . ,, r;, , .„ . . 'lbta b ts]ated m the pmdm of
the Sop alphdma wM tegdm pyleaa at o to be @oft t A= the paopeety tine a dimim of
1S feet, vhae boIldioga fn the H-4 Dis&kt array be aamett1e11ed with a mao Det%-&
M ime w o db need to our aepaeatt on the Cedar So= (Wdm Caaeter. 'lie Plemtos
Commiulon'a aomaeesoa wax to aNldtCia rho atp aalthart .., r,' ., ,,,.,.,. in the 13.4 Dtettla u a
000lminty Ozdmm iame, author dw as baue dtleaty mb and to the t u*n Comer Cmd1dwal
Una limit. 'he akmative appaoaohca am teflappad to the folbwbS oeCdoa.
ANAZYMA
• ft Sen alt mi dwe would be to leave the Otdim me bv~ u ft t#aade. M& pmK=
two paeaW .....,� ,. , c e... Piot b the om meatbaed to the Cedar Steoet Darden Oemm
imm The Wift In do D-4 Dt0elts am be loo at the peopeety tine. wbaaeu a pylon
dp mao be uftdl 15 feet (Dee Zansiq Oadtamoe Seta. 3-9 (CJ Saabd. 7.) rbe ammd
5775 Wayzata Blvd • Suite 555 • St. Louis Park. MN 55416 • (612) 595-963&Fax. 593.8837
APR -28-1995 1048 NAC 612 595 91337 P.05/06
pmplem is related to Section 3-9 [E] Subd. 4.(&). This action tegafn 1 pylon 40 to be
located outside of the , - I I I yards in any zooft district. This mom that in those
Mom— which have bWlftg aftacks of more than 15 feet, which Is all di -h- but the
S4. in dm districts the is foot OP Sda* rapbenift is krak"d sh" the building
setback would ptedominam.
IU second alive would be to Mud— the pylon which requires
that such signs man the regular building sotbacit then aher the 15 ADO setback
requirement to a standard of 50 percent of the building setba& Ibs approach would
contlene the CWs policy of rqpgaft pylon signs equally by zoning district and would
eliminate the inconsistency betareasboth the two Ordinance sections and between the
dMorcutial B-4 building wad sign wftcb. A dtaft Ordinance which accomplishes this
effect in attached to this report.
In order to ==vft this WW approach the Planing Commission mat =11m findhigs
which amply with the Zoning Ordinsocc, rcadstioat for --nd—. The Planning
Commission's J l, of an Ordinance affiendoM is to be based upon die following
factors, among others:
1. Rel -i to FIRL
2.The geographical area firvolved.
3. Whether the use will devved— the arm In which h proposed
4. IU dmncw of ft awouzift am
S. The I — I slow for the IM
lnmnbzbigdivan hcwmkbclot that the Ckywill mbeAom)dodo anear rue tato any sea,
but ndw, It will me* be rqpibft the location of an mdatittg use (pylon signs). The palmary
factor of the show items to number 4. die eharatxetof the surrounding arm, and number 5, the
mead for the ase. With regard to the ...... ... . Y,,, seek pylon signs , , " .... I ........
which madam a location bdW the bufld6sg sed" WOMM appear to be an kadond standard.
With regard to d.,,,.,,. I need, there Is Me asgumcot dist clear and ... ..... I business
— ......... . ...... Is a need, and a e4K of IcxW psopetry owner. When the Osdbwm which
ICPIM 60 , ... am plat, ft polkia at the Comprehensive Plan M most SUDY
effectuated. Such a finding In sWm of a matin m amend ft Zaft Ordinance would
a==11th the Orditmm Amcmdom mq&=M
SIM M"Y
The Sign —1— of the 7aft OWhmw booncoWinouglint wadi beffin tegard to is setback
requirements. We would rocanimod in ameadmeal to the Ordinance which corrects the
Inconsistencies. and cluffies the trestateft of pyla dSu In 9-4 Districts. A suggtited draft
Ordinance , Is Attached.
pe: Jeff O'Neill
APR 1995 1014t9 - - NAC - -- ---- - - - 612 595 9637 P.06/m
OBDD DANCE NO.
AN f3MANCS AbWWAG TATE 1% WKM AS UM ZONNG OBDIIHAItiCB OF
THE CUT OFBIMCr 3§=,CBAFM3S,GOAL,i,i..,i,&,.o,iaWMAIM70
9=45, BY RHM A7WG = A LWWABIB SB'BAM KM PYLON SI(M AND
SI(M OVZR 7" SWAM FM III AIISA.
TIM CTIY CO1JNC13. OF TIB Crff OF MON =.LO DO=EOMM ORDAIN:
Sad= 3.9 [C) SdL 7. h booby ammbed to mad a ldowL
7. To uq district, my porAm of NW dp two C2) agoase hast shall be set haft a
do= OW to Slly pemm 00%) of the to m I I building ad=* fa that dhmlot s
ditW in aoctham" [C) of the Mande to Zoaiog OWbumr, as may be amended.
Sotlmi
Sectim 3-9 [B) Sdbd. CA) L hcrrby amended to and as fmUmc
4. (a) Lad= M pylae dp dm8 be bated cbm to the plopeaty lion than as WbwW
In 8ecdon" [C] SdW. 7. In the ate of a coma lot, both dries 6uaft on a
public dght-a?raay shad be deemed the boot.
Sell
Tbia OdWom andl Moe dFm sad be in M Moe h m sad after !tt pauage and puWkeW
0�
TOM P.06