Planning Commission Agenda Packet 02-22-1994 SpecialAGENDA
SPECL46L MEETING - MONTICELLO PLANNING COM11dMION
Tuesday, February 22, 1884. 8 p.m.
1. Call to order.
2. Public Hearing --Consideration of an amendment to the zoning map which
would change the zoning district designation of Part of Lot 4, Block 1, of the
Lauring Hillside Terrace Addition, from R-3 (multi -family residential) to
PZM (performance zone mixed) zoning. Applicant, Vaughn Veit.
3. Public Hearing --Consideration of an amendment to a conditional use permit
which would allow expansion of an existing restaurant in a PZM
(performance zone mixed) zone. Applicant, Hillside Partnership.
4. Adjourn.
e9 6,4-
a
,4 - Sys
� p
i P,e s F I F �w • t,n.�u�►f
-V 46loseJ $o►tk- /1 , .P ke d -
d f4,- uiaa„J of Po /xo /6i''/.
N L..�t1Yai • A*4— ;1 4.
1. �trM �e+�tJa W�t4 ate of Ail
a; ta- palC4t
'ss flit o.
U va J b S of*v:dss -
C;,%4L$ ,L w t ► M'It St4
AMS o_ � ��� ,p, c%.•� �.ss�..l�61L V-3 6A 1.1.0 E.W;l
C-vP - #fo, c po ek •O
At 4volta
40.41 eF CIO p .
/Vi GHvK% k�
nd
��� fi ✓ ' het sp i f �' C e «►e41 -J
Avu.dae fOb / se I..- r%«.. - cs.
`'� w;.►de�s - 7 w:4%4k.,.e %t„.,. 110
Sri,.-v
G. VA t.• f�eF dit GP-/V-Vl.
'z. 4� . �i arc t �•t k� Ic.�+ V �t
"0%
a
PEO -22-914 TIDE 7: 15 0 P 02
FACNorthwest Associated Consultants, Inc.
U K a A N PLANNING • e K 8 I O N. MARKIT K e a K A p c N
MEMORANDUM
TO: Jeff O'Neill
FROM: Stephen rrittman
DATE: 22 February 1994
RE: Monticello - Hillside Partnership - Sixth Street
Annex Parking Expansion
FILE NO: 191.07 - 94.08
This report outlines the procedural steps necessary for the
expansion of the parking facilities for the sixth street Annex
Shopping Center. The proposed parking would be located on a parcel
adjacent to the current shopping center, however it is currently a
separate lot of record. The moat desirable processing is to permit
a subdivision of the now parcel and recombine thepuking expansion
ares to the existing parcel containing the shopping center.
Once this is accomplished, the Boning of the newly split lot would
need to be addressed, since the parking expansion area would still
be zoned R-7, Multiple Family Residential. There are two options
for the City to pursue. The entire parcel, prior to subdivision,
could be zoned PZM to accommodate the shopping center's parking, or
the PZM sone could be extended only as fax as the newly created tot
line.
In the latter case, the remaining land not being utilised for
parking would stay 2-9, consistent with the land uses on the
aurroundin lots. it the PZM sone were extended to encompass the
entire subject property, future land uses would be controlled by
the Comprehensive Plan. To the extent.that the primary surrounding
land use is multiple family residential, the City would have
adequate controls in place to restrict any expansion of commercial
uses.
2-94 TUE 7:16 0
P . 0 3
It would not appear that either proposal would have distinct
advantages over the other. Whereas the PZM designation would infer
other potential land uses beyond multiple family, any such use
would be subject to public hearing and extensive review. This
review would also occur if the R-3 designation were retained, but
a landowner proposed a zoning change to allow a different use.
This review would not occur, however, if the landowner proposed to
construct a multiple family project under the R-3 zoning Ia
permitted uses.
Regardless of the zoning on the residual parcel, this proposal
would appear to be positive in that parking supply Me been an
issue in previous reviews of the Sixth Street Annex. it could be
expected that without additional facilities, parking will continue
to cause problems for occupants of the center.