Planning Commission Agenda Packet 05-03-1994AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION
Tuesday, May 3, 1984 - 7 pm
Members: Cindy Lemm, Richard Carlson, Jon Bogart, Richard Martie, Brian
Stumpf
1. Call to order.
2. Approval of minutes of the regular meeting held April b, 1994.
3. Public Hearing Continued --Consideration of preliminary plat of the
Eastwood Knoll subdivision.
4. Public Hearing Continued --Consideration of the Emmerich/Klein rezoning
and comprehensive plan amendment request, and consideration of the
Hoglund/Lundsten rezoning.
5. Public Hearing --Consideration of a conditional use permit allowing a church
facility to operate in an R-1 zone. Applicant, A Glorious Church.
8. Public Hearing --Consideration of granting conditional use permits allowing
a minor auto repair and towing operation and allowing associated outside
storage in a B-3 (highway business) zone. Applicant, Jerry s Towing/Milton
Olson.
7. Public Hearing --Consideration of an amendment to Section 34 (G) of the
zoning ordinance that further defines minimum floor area requirements for
various styles of single family residential structures. Applicant, Monticello
Planning Commission.
8. Public Hearing --Consideration of a variance request to allow a garage
addition onto an existing house within the ten (10) foot side yard setback
requirement. Applicant, Harold Austin. (Gary verbal report at meeting)
9. Public Hearing --Consideration of variance requests which would allow
placement of a sign on a public right of -way. Applicant, Monticello -Big
Lake Hospital District, (Jeff verbal report at meeting)
10. Adjourn.
Planning Commission Agenda - 6/3/94
P_ ublle Hearing Continued. -Consideration of nreliminam plat of the
Eastwood Knoll subdivision. (J.O. )
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
At the previous meeting of the Planning Commission, Planning Commission
reviewed revisions to the original subdivision design and discussed other
design alternatives for development of Outlots C and D. As a result of the
discussion, it was determined that the item should be tabled. Staff was
directed to prepare a new design for the subdivision. The new design
features a less direct route through the general area, thereby reducing the
level of cut -through traffic. City Engineer Bret Weiss obtained input from
Jon Bogart regarding this third option and has prepared a sketch plan
accordingly. Subsequent to Planning Commission action, the City Council
authorized City staff to solicit proposals from developers in purchasing the
property outright. Any proposals will be considered at the City Council
meeting on May 9, 1994.
As you can see, the new plan shifts the connection point between Briar
Oakes and Eastwood Knoll to the west. Making the connection at this
location will have the effect of eliminating the exclusive cul-de-sac planned
for the final phase of the Briar Oakes subdivision. Perhaps this plan could
be improved by shifting the connection point slightly to the east, thereby
saving the Briar Oakes cul-de-sac. This plan also places the collector
roadway on the portion of the terrain where grades are the steepest.
Although through traffic will be reduced because of the design, the through
traffic that does use this road will be traversing significant grades on
Eastwood Knoll. Finally, the design as shown does not eliminate access to
Meadow Oak Lane. In fact, it could occur that traffic from Briar Oakes
might find it preferable to use Meadow Oak Lane to get to the freeway
access versus the collector road. This is because using Meadow Oak Lane is
the most direct route to the freeway under this design.
Planning Commission is asked to review the three basic designs proposed
for the Eastwood Knoll subdivision and determine a preference.
�-VIIlUUII SI.LhI�I[i�:E
Motion to approve the preliminary plat of the Eastwood Knoll
subdivision under the orieinal design.
Planning Commission Agenda - 6/3/94
Under this alternative, the City will be assured of achieving its goal
of creating an exclusive, isolated neighborhood. As a result,
additional traffic impacts will be experienced by the existing Meadow
Oak neighborhood.
As a variation of this alternative, the connection to Briar Oakes could
be eliminated, thereby maintaining separation as envisioned under
the original PUD design.
Under this alternative, the future connection of Briar Oakes to
Eastwood Knoll would be eliminated, thereby eliminating any
possibility of cut -through traffic traveling in either direction. Briar
Oakes traffic created by 64 lots would enter and leave at one location;
Meadow Oak/Eastwood Knoll traffic consisting of traffic generated by
62 lots would also enter and leave the subdivision at one location.
This alternative is not consistent with the standard practice of
providing at least two outlets from each development; however, due to
the relatively small size of each subdivision and due to the potential
of the road becoming a shortcut for traffic outside the development, it
might make some sense to select this alternative. This alternative
will impact the efficiency of snow removal, bus service, and police
patrol services by requiring longer travel distance between
subdivisions.
Motion to approve the preliminary plat of the Eastwood Knoll
subdivision following the Meadow Oak Lane bvoass" design.
The alternative plan features the extension of the roadway from Briar
Oakes extending through the site, thereby providing direct access to
Meadow Oak Avenue and bypassing" Meadow Oak Estates. Under
this configuration, additional traffic impact on Meadow Oak Lane will
be minimized, and the roadway connecting the Briar Oakes area to
Meadow Oak Lane through Eastwood Knoll can be constructed to a
313-R, wide minimum, which is the City standard for this type of
roadway. By keeping additional traffic out of the Meadow Oak
Estates area, property values in Meadow Oak Estates can be
maintained.
The downside of this alternative is that the lots created along either
side of the collector road on Eastwood Knoll will not be as exclusive
as under the original design and will likely, therefore, fotch a lower
Planning Commission Agenda - 5/3/94
price. This design will not affect the exclusivity of the lots on the
Eastwood Knoll cul-de-sac to the west. Under this alternative, the
City's goal of creating an exclusive neighborhood for the entire area is
diminished; however, preserving the exclusivity of the original
Meadow Oak Estates is maintained.
As a final note, the City will need to acquire a lot along Meadow Oak
Avenue for a through street. According to Rick, there is at least
$25,000 in delinquent taxes and assessments against this property.
He is relatively certain that the City can acquire it through the tax
foreclosure process or through a direct sale of the property by
Dickman Knutson to the City.
As a variation of this alternative, the connection of the through street
to Briar Oakes could be eliminated, thus eliminating the drive-
through traffic and maintaining exclusivity. This would also result in
creation of a separate entrance to Eastwood Knoll apart from the
Meadow Oak entrance. From a marketing standpoint, it may be an
advantage in creating a separate entrance, as it would provide the
opportunity for placement of landscaping, signage, etc., which would
assist in creating an attitude supporting higher -end housing.
Motion to recommend approval of the latest subdivision design.
Under this alternative, the Planning Commission prefers the latest
design submitted by the City Engineer, which calls for shifting of the
Briar Oakes/Eastwood Knoll connection point farther to the west,
thereby creating a less direct route through the area, which achieves
the goal of providing a through street while at the same time
inhibiting or discouraging cut4through traffic due to the convoluted
nature of the road configuration.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Although the latest design (3) does appear to achieve the goal of
discouraging cut -through traffic, it will also result in the loss of the Briar
Oakes cul-de-sac. City staff is certain that the developer of the Briar Oakes
subdivision would not support this alternative. In addition, we are
concerned that under this design, Meadow Oak Lane will likely be used as
Cho collector road, as it provides the most direct route from Briar Oakes to
the freeway. Rather than recommending a specific design for the Planning
Commission, City staff recommends that the following two goals be achieved
with whatever design the Planning Commission selects.
Planning Commission Agenda - 5/3/94
The fust goal would be to make sure that design of the
subdivision does not dump excessive amounts of traffic through
the Meadow Oak Estates neighborhood. This goal would
appear to eliminate alternative til.
The design should not negatively impact the Briar Oakes
subdivision design. This goal would appear to eliminate
alternative #3 or require that this design alternative be
modified.
The subdivision design should incorporate the natural features
of the site.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Site plans showing alternative &1 (original design), alternative q2 (bypass
design), alternative #3 (eliminate Briar Oakes/Oak Ridge connection).
11
I ul- MONTICELLO WRIGHT hDUN7Y MI
-VICINIt-mp
-6
AWPOSED WNIAC
RAIMO WIT OEVROPWNr #Wj
0-1 RESIDWIAL
..................
C)
VA
.
T
12
. 04
ZP
-72 P
Of
-VICINIt-mp
-6
jftef�rLC' #�a-•r �'
ell•;.
MEADOW OAK AVE.
Drown F3r, L Drawing iiuq
R G 0 ..tg.,ne.
DuU, Oylrw • 4,1„�M.. n...M.. ew�a.
3/20/94
0 290 A
SCALE IN FEET
Cwroa. l
3445.
L3
Amtemi;ue 016.
MEADOW OAK AVE. -- = "- : ' • `
r
Urown eyl
Drawing Title
R G D
gKolon
Dale,
ejoel�te.. IAO.
C '26/94
ap..o.. erau.w . n...».. e....,.,.
O M n.. e.r. • WM. h..w�
e....rw►o �arur.aawure
0 290 4�0
SCALE IN FEET
Comm. No.
3445.00
Figure
B
rwr.v.w+
9
Planning Commission Agenda - 5/3/94
4. Public Hearinu Continued—Consideration of the Emmerich/Wein
rezoning and comprehensive plan amendment renueat. and
consideration of the Hoalund/Lundsten rezoninq. (J.0.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
At the previous meeting, Planning Commission was provided additional
information which outlined the impact of various land use development
patterns for the subject area. The presentation was geared to address
questions pertaining to proper land use transitions and concerns regarding
maintenance of industrial land inventory. In the presentation, a video was
provided which showed examples of how the City of New Hope has made
transitions between industrial and residential land. An inventory of available
land by type of use was provided, which provided rough projections as to
available supply in terms of years remaining by type of land use.
The purpose of this presentation is to give you information not already
presented at the previous meeting and to add clarity to the discussion by
reducing alternatives.
NEW INFORMATION
At the previous meeting, Planning Commission acted to table the matter
further and requested that staff follow-up the New Hope video by contacting
New Hope City Hall with specific questions regarding the effectiveness of the
berming shown in the video. Questions to be asked include the following: Are
property values for residential property negatively impacted by proximity to
industry? Do industries report problems with trespassing? Aro multi -family
vacancy rates impacted? Etc. A report on this issue as compiled by Northwest
consultants will be provided at the meeting,
Also as follow-up to the last meeting, I asked Northwest Consultants to
prepare a land use configuration that would preserve additional industrial land
on the north half of the Klein site. A sketch plan showing this alternative
along with a report is also provided for your review.
B. ALTERNATIVE; ACTIONS:
DECISION 1: Emmerich Rezoning Request
A. Motion to adopt or modify and adopt the zoning map amendment
request based on the finding that the rezoning is consistent with the
58
Planning Commission Agenda - 5/3/94
comprehensive plan, consistent with the character and geography of the
area, will not result in a depreciation in land values, and there is a
demonstrated need for the types of land uses proposed.
B. Motion to deny the zoning map amendment request.
DECISION 2: Klein Comprehensive Plan Amendments
A. Motion to amend the comprehensive plan by specifically identifying
acceptable land uses as requested by Klein.
Under this alternative, the Planning Commission is satisfied with the
land use plan as proposed. The next step for Klein is to request
annexation followed by a rezoning process. Klein's property, when
annexed, enters the city with the AG designation and must subsequently
be zoned to match the comp plan designation.
B. Motion to amend the comprehensive plan by identifying industrial and
residential land uses in the north 80 acres of the Klein site.
DECISION 3: Hoglund/Lundsten Rezone
Motion to adopt or modify and adopt the zoning map amendment
request based on the finding that the rezoning is consistent with the
comprehensive plan, consistent with the character and geography of the
area, will not result in a depreciation in land values, and there is a
demonstrated need for the types of land uses proposed.
B. Motion to deny the zoning map amendment request.
Under this alternative, Planning Commission could decide to defer any
decisions on this matter until road system development needs are better
understood. As noted earlier, it is possible that Chelsea Road could be
extended along the northern boundary of the rezone, site which would
provide improved access, thus making the site a better candidate for B-3
zoning.
In addition, in order to control where adult uses locate, the City must
provide a percentage of available land 11-21 for such uses. The Lundsten
property, with its 1-2 designation, provides a place for adult uses some
distance from residential uses. If the City provides only a very small
9b
Planning Commission Agenda - 5/3/94
supply of land available for adult land uses, then it could be accused of
excluding adult uses, which could be used as a justification for an adult
use locating in another section of the city.
Reasons for su000rting the Emmerich/Iaein or000saL
or alternatives 1. A. and 2. A.
a. Land inventory - sufficient industrial land currently within the city is
available to handle short- and medium-term needs (1-15 years). Land
is available within the township to address long- term needs. Plan for
new interchange in 15 to 20 years on NW side of community.
b. Proper transition for industrial and residential land uses can be
achieved. Isolation of 1-2 area can be achieved through berming and
separation of residential and industrial traffic.
C. A district to serve regional commercial enterprises needs to be
established to allow Monticello to compete with other communities.
d. Land use configuration will encourage timely and economical
development of Fallon Avenue and School Boulevard. Congestion and
unacceptable mixing of industrial and residential traffic is occurring at
various locations. In addition, Fallon Avenue needs to be widened. This
alternative matches current land use demand and will, therefore, result
in development of roadways at a quicker pace.
e. The Kjellberg property is better suited for commercial use than
residential use due to pipeline and powerline easements.
Reasons for sunoorting niternativm 1. B. and 2. B.
a. Land in the city is finite. Industrial land should be preserved when
possible to assure long-term solid tax base.
b There are no guarantees that land in township could be zoned or
developed for industrial use in the long-term future.
C. The City should consider sharing utility extension expenses through
future industrial areas in order to protect industrial land inventory.
50
Planning Commission Agenda - 5/3/94
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff supports the Emmerich/IQein plan; however, we agree that strong steps
are needed to develop industrial land in the city and to preserve potential
industrial land outside of the city. The steps proposed are outlined on the
attached area map.
Staff recommends that the Hoglund/Lundsten rezoning question be tabled or
denied pending completion of the transportation study and completion of the
comprehensive plan.
SUPPORTING DATA:
Recommendations: HRA, IDC, Chamber of Commerce; Area map outlining
Planner's recommendation; Planners comments - New Hope berming efforts,
to be provided at the meeting; Planner's comments/map - North Iflein
industrial; Draft infrastructure plan; Excerpts from comprehensive plan.
sd
MAY- 2-94 MON 17:12 0 P.02
NrNorthwest Associated Consultants, Inc.
URBAN VL AN NI NO • DESIGN • MARKS? R lSR A RCN
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Jell O'Neill
FROM:
Alan erixius
DATE:
2 May 1994
&E:
Monticello - industrial Screening
FILE NO:
191.07 - 94.02
As per your request, we have contacted Kirk McDonald, Assistant
City Administrator and Doug Sandstad, City Building inspector of
the City of New Hope and interviewed them regarding industrial
residential land use screening. Specifically, lour sites were
discussed.
mac'" f^1[
New Hope staff prefaced their responses with the following
comment •1
i. The City is an older community. The City deals with never
development and in-place expansion with stricter screening
standards now than may have originally been applied. Through
the City,a growth experience, the City has learned what to
effective with regard to screening.
2. Effective land use transition and compatible land use patterns
deal with more than screening. Setbacks, building
orientation, limitation on outside activity areas in
combination with screening provide the most effective
transition between industrial and residential properties.
7. Continued code enforcement of noise standards and property
maintenance is also necessary Be the industrial site ages and
equipment may not operate as effectively as when it was new.
MAY- 2-94 M o m 17:13 0
l
Creamettes
P.03
The Creamettes facility is located on 36th Avenue in New Hope. The
site abuts Single family housing on the east and multiple family to
the southeast.
Over the years, this facility has generated complaints with regard
to truck traffic, noise from rooftop equipment and pasta odors.
Over the past ten years Creamettes has expanded a number of times.
With each expansion, the City has attempted to reduce the impact on
adjacent residents.
• The replacement of rooftop equipment has resolved noise issues
in Summer months.
• Re -orientation of the loading dock to the south of the
building and extensive screening has reduced traffic and noise
complaints.
• Extensive screening along the east property line has reduced
site aesthetic concerns.
The City still receives an occasion complaint, however, the past 1
improvements have been effective.
Emerald Pointe Aparbnente
Emerald Point* Apartments is located at 36th Street in New Hope.
This apartment complex abuts industrial on the south and east and
commercial to the west.
This apartment complex was developed after the industrial park.
Site design was important to avoid ccaipatibility concerns.
• The buildings are setback from the industrial and cc=rcial
land uses. Parking and landscape areae are used to provide
distance separation.
• Screening is provided along the periphery of the site.
• The two apartment buildings are designed to orient the
building away from the industrial sites. only a limited
number of apartments have views of the industrial areas.
• The apartment recreation area is located in a center court
yard screened from the industrial areas by the building and
landscaping.
a
MAY- 2-94 M O N 17:13 0
P. 0.4
The complaints from this complex have been sparse and generally
relate to industrial or commercial site appearance for and and 3rd
floor apartment tenants.
491h and Wim Aparturmts
This area is an older area of the City. The apartment abuts a
warehousing facility to the north.
While the City has required extensive screening between the two
uses, the City has received complaints with regard to truck traffic
and noise. The warehouse facility accesses a rail spur to the
north. As a result all building truck traffic and access is south
of the building along the apartment property.
The proximity of the semi -trucks to the apartments has created
noise problems for those residents. The City has placed
restrictions on truck use to reduce the noise problems.
The building inspector relates the land use issues in this.area to
building orientation and the nice of the industrial site.
-gab Street Townhomes
The townhomes located on 50th Street and winnetke abut industrial
to the north. The industrial land was developed after the
townhomse.
in the industrial site development the following design items were
emphasised:
• targe setback from residential area.
• Extensive screening and berming along the south property line
to screen the residential areas.
• Building orientation to reduce activity concerns.
The Building Inspector indicated that currently no complaints have
been recieved. However, past complaints included noise from trucks
at night and odors. The noise problems were resolved by change of
building tenants. The odor problem was corrected through the
required replacement of a facility incinerator.
3
MAY- 2-94 MON 1TS14 0
Conckdon
P.05
Now Hope has a limited supply of vacant land. As ouch, they are
particularly sensitive to any new construction, building alteration
or expaneLon. They stress quality in all aspects of site design
and the City's Design and Review Committee is particularly
effective in its application of screening, landscaping and building
appearance regulations.
IrN Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc.
+ C URBAN PL ANNI 180 • DESIGN • MARK ■ T RESIA FICH
MEMORAIWUM
TO: Jeff O'Neill
FROM: Stephen Grittman
DATE: 27 April 1994
RE: Monticello - Klein Emmerich - Oakwood Industrial
Park Expansion
FILE NO: 191.07 - 94.02
Enclosed is the conceptual expansion of the Oakwood Industrial
Park. The access pointe are from Dundas and Oakwood Drive (County
Rd. 118). The westerly access road from Dundas would be optional,
and in fact, may not provide any substantive benefit. Buffering
would be an issue on the east boundary with the school (along
Fallon Avenue), as well as the transition between the Industrial
and the Multiple Family.
We have tried to make sure that the traffic patterns are not mixed
in an effort to preserve the value of School Boulevard. However,
this necessarily results in an additional access street to serve
the multiple family area. This layout would push the Single Family
area approximately 1,000 feet further south due to the depth of the
Industrial area. The transition between Industrial and Multiple
Family is still required.
While we still believe that the original plan is more responsive to
the realities of the City's future development, the attached layout
would be our recommendation if the City determines that the
preservation of additional industrial land is the better approach.
The memo attached to the plan gives some details to the layout.
5775 Wayzata Blvd. - Suite 555 - Sl. Louts Park, MN 55416.(612) 595 -9636 -Fax. 595-9837
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Stephen Grittman
FROM:
Bob Kirmis
DATE:
26 April 1994
RE:
Monticello - Klein/Emmerich Mixed Use
Concept (Chelsea Area)
FILE NO:
191.07 - 94.02
Attached please find an alternative concept plan for development of
the Klein property located south of the Oakwood Industrial Park and
west of Fallon Avenue. The alternative is intended to make an
allowance for additional industrial land use in the area.
As shown on the attached concept plan, a southern expansion of the
industrial park has been proposed with new lots being serviced by
an internal loop street from Oakwood Drive and Dundas Road. In
total, an additional 52.6 acres of industrial land have been
proposed. Lots within the expansion area range from 2.8 to 6.4
acres in size. To be noted is that southerly street extensions
into the industrial expansion area would overlay existing platted
property within Block 3 of the industrial park. Thus, a
resubdivision will be necessary to accommodate the extensions.
Directly south of the industrial park expansion area, approximately
35 acres of multiple family residential development has been
proposed. Such a use is intended to provide a logical transition
in land use between industrial development to the north and low
density residential development to the south. Multiple family use
would be provided access from an interior loop street from School
Street. Such street overlays an existing United Power Association
easement.
Directly south of School Street, approximately 61 acres of low
density residential development has been proposed.
If you have any questions or comments regarding this material,
please advise.
PROPOSED LAND USES
0 LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
WE • 1-4
® MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL mmm NEW STREET V.808.
® INDUSTRIAL
'ERWO
� MONTICBLLO INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITTBB
����
SPECIAL MEETING, MARCH 31, 1994 - 7:30 A.M.
` CITY HALL
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairperson John McVay, Shelley Johnson,
Cyndie Johnson, Bill Tapper, Dennis Taylor,
Merrlyn Seefeldt, Ron Hoglund, Ren Maus, Jim
Fleming, Don Smith, and Dr. Glenn Nemc.
MEMBERS ABSENT: Kevin Doty, Tom Lindquist, Steven Lemme, Arve
Grimemo, Harvey Kendall, and Jay Morrell.
GUEST: Bill Enders.
STAFF PRESENT: 011ie Koropchak.
STAFF ABSENT: Rick Wolfsteller and Jeff 0' Neill.
THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATIONS WERE MADE BY A GENERAL CONSENSUS OF
THE IDC MEMBERSHIP:
1. Recommends the Planning Commission consider endorsing the
Initiation of a long-range industrial land use study focusing
on freeway access and transportation circulation. (The IDC
was not convinced the Planner had given much thought to this.
2. Rcommende the Planning Commission consider endorsing the
rezoning of the Stuart Hoglund property from 0-3 to I-1. (To
enhance and preserve sellable industrial land.)
3. Recommends the Planning Commission consider endorsing a buffer
•sone". not just a buffer, between the I-2 Zone and the
proposed R-3 Zone of the Klein property. (The IDC views the
abutting I-2 Zone and R-3 Zone as incompatible.)
4. Recommends the Planning Commission consider endorsing the
continuation of the study for potential freeway interchanges
to the east and west of the Highway 28 Interchange and for the
Fallon Avenue Overpass. (To enhance and preserve a long-
range freeway interchange plan and a north/south connector
route for the City of Monticello.)