HRA Agenda 03-11-1992l MONTICELLO HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Wednesday, March 11, 1992
City Hall
MEMBERS: Chairperson Al Larson, Ben Smith, Lowell Schrupp,
Everette Ellison, and Tom St. Hilaire.
STASH MEMBERS: Rick Wolfsteller, Jeff O'Neill, and 011ie
Koropchak.
GUEST: Tom Sherer, Representative of Charles Ehlen, current
owner of the Monticello Post Office building.
1. CALL TO ORDER.
2. CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE THE FEBRUARY 12, 1992 HRA MINUTES.
3. CONSIDERATION TO HEAR OF THE POST OFFICE RELOCATION OPTIONS
AND CONSIDERATION TO RECOMMEND SUPPORT.
4. CONSIDERATION TO REVIEW ADDITIONAL SITES FOR THE COTTEGE HOME
HOUSING CONCEPT.
8. CONSIDERATION TO ELECT 1992 RRA OFFICERS.
S. CONSIDERATION OF AN UPDATE ON THE REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL TO
CERTIFIED TANK REMOVAL CONTRACTORS.
7. OTHER BUSINESS.
a. Copy of the BDS February billing.
B. ADJOURNMENT.
MINUTES
MONTICELLO HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Wednesday, February 12, 1992 - 7:OOPM
City Hall
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairperson Al Larson, Lowell Schrupp, and Ben
Smith.
MEMBERS ABSENT: Everette Ellison and Tom St. Hilaire.
STAFF PRESENT: 011ie Koropchak.
STAFF ABSENT: Rick Wolfsteller and Jeff O'Neill.
1. CALL TO ORDER.
Chairperson Larson called the HRA meeting to order at 7:03 AN.
2. CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE THE JANUARY 18, 1992 HRA MINUTES.
Lowell Schrupp made a motion to approve the January 11.5, 1992
HRA minutes, seconded by Ben Smith and with no corrections or
additions the minutes were approved as written.
3. CONSIDERATIOP OF AN UPDATLK ON REQUAST FOR PPOPOSAL FOR ABOVR
GROUND CLEAN-UP AND TANK REMOVAL/ SAMPLING OF THE GILLS
PROPERTY.
Koropchak reported of her conversation with the County Auditor
regarding the property tax forfeited Gille Parcel. The County
Planning Commission Is checking on PCA guidelines, and on
liability and Environment Assessment issues. At this time,
the City has not been notified of the land use, land
classification, or land valuation. After land valuations are
determined, it is the intent of the County Auditor to hold one
Public Sale for all forfeited property.
Koropchak further reported of her conversation with Catherine
Serier (297-8879) of the PCA office. Inorder to comply with
the State's requirement, Koropchak has requested a current
list of certified contractors to mail a requeot for proposal
for the removal of fuel tanks and necessary samplings. An
Environmental Assessment should include a history of the
property, a view of the property, a work plan, and estimated
costs. These costa are not covered by the Petro Fund but are
the liability of the responsible party. Fuel tank
leak/contamination clean-up costs can be recovered up to 90%.
if PCA Guidelines are followed.
HRA MINUTES
2-12-92
For other contamination such as fuel or oil spills from a body
shop business is referred to as "solvents" and those clean-up
costs are not covered by the Petro Fund. Those costs are
covered under the Super Fund Law which does not reimburse
costs but allows the State to go after the responsible party
for payment or collection. This is with the Property Tax
Technical Assistance Program, Jerry Stackey, 297-1459.
The HRA agreed on the need to follow the PCA's requirments and
not to duplicate any County research therefore recommended
staff contact qualified contractors for estimates to complete
an Environmental Assessment and to follow up on the Super Fund
Law.
4. CORSIpERATION TO DETERMINE SITE LOCATIONS FOR THE COTTEOE HOME
HOUSING CONCEPT.
Koropchak informed the RRA that Ben Smith and herself had
viewed several sites as a preliminary start for the HRA to
consider as possibilities for the cottage home housing concept
development. Koropchak felt inorder to market a development
of upscale quality the location becomes an important factor.
Additionally, to establish a TIF Redevelopment District it
must meet the substandard (blight) requirements and to
establish a base value the property would require one year HRA
ownershlr. Costs for the project would include property
acquisition, demolition, and relocation. A preliminary figure
of estimated taxes to be generated by seven homes with a
estimated marks t value (EKV) of 8103,700 would be
approximately $9,000.
Based on the site plan shown the HRA the previous month by
Prestige Builders, seven cottege homes were developed in a
straight line on a parcel 75 feet by 330 feet or on 24,750 sq
ft. Therefore, a Monticello parcel of one street length 330
feet and two 66 ft lots for a total of 43,560 sq ft should be
sufficient for development and to comply with Monticello
setbacks (Example Block 33). One-half block would consist of
one street length 330 feet and 165 feet for 54,450 sq ft.
With the use of a+n overhead, the HRA reviewed the information
on Blocks 54 and 55 along River and Front Streets between
Walnut and Linn. Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, Block 55 consists of
four property owners and has a total EMV of 6212,600, this was
earmarked as the most attractive area by the HRA.
Next, the HRA reviewed the information on Blocks 9, 10, and 11
along Fifth Street between Linn and Vine. Smith and Koropchak
Page 2
HRA MINUTES
2-12-92
considered this area, of those viewed, to beat fit the blight
requirements and the EMV's were comparatively lower.
The easterly Lots of Block 33: Lots 4, 3, 6 were earmarked by
the HRA as the most convenient location to the commercial
areas. The redevelopment would consist of three property
owners and has a total EMV of 9139,800.
Block 29 had been viewed by Smith and Koropchak, however, not
presented to the HRA.
The HRA was most interested in the areas of Block Sb and Block
33 and agreed to further look at sites along East Broadway and
Block F.
b. coxsrDERATZON TO ELECT 1992 HRA OFFICERS: CHAIRPERSON AND
VICE CHAIRPERSON.
Tabled until more members are present.
6. CONSIDERATION TO REVIEW ODS, INC. BILLING.
The HRA reviewed the monthly billing from BDS, Inc. and
acknowledged the receipt and preference of the monthly
statement.
7. ¢ONS1DfFATJON TO REVTFW A1{D AC)0J0NLEDgg RECE1?T OF 'EFE 1991
ECO)IOMIC ACTAVITY REPORT, THE 199$ E¢ONOMIC DEVELOPMENT WORK
PLAN, AND THE 1992 BRE SURVEY RESULTS.
The HRA appreciated the well-prepared reports and acknowledged
having received the Star City required reports. The HRA noted
the number of times property taxes were mentioned.
6. OTHER BUSINESS.
None.
9. ADJOURNMENT,
The HRA meeting adjourned at 8:16 PM.
KLro�9_
011ie Koropchak, HRA Executive Director
Page 3
HRA Agenda
March 11, 1992
Consideration to Hear of the Post Office Relocation Options
and Consideration to Recommend Support.
Reference and Backaround.
On Monday, March 9, Mr. Tom Scherer, a representative for Dr.
Charles Ehlen of St. Cloud visited my office on a referral
from Chairperson Larson. Dr. Ehlen is the owner of the
Monticello Post Office Building which currently has an
estimated market value of $193,900 and generates annual taxes
of $6,888.98. It is my understanding that Mr. Scherer is
looking for city/HRA/group recommendations and support to the
location of the Post Office and requested to be on the HRA
agenda.
The current facility located along West Broadway is
approximately 3,600 sq ft. The proposed site on East 7 Street
(east of Burger King) Is approximately 8 acres with the intent
of the US Government to construct a 7,000 sq ft building (tax
exempt).
Some thoughts for the HRA to consider:
1. Potential vacant building in downtown area.
2. Lose of downtown pedestrian traffic and Impact to
downtown businesses.
3. Convenient and within walking distance.
6. Central location.
6. Vehicle traffic.
6. Future needs of poet office.
7. Adequate site size.
8. Expand at location or new downtown location.
9. Time frame.
Information will be available at the HRA meeting as to the
boundary linea of TIB Redevelopment District e2.
Dr. Ehlen and Mr. Scherer were present at the City Council
meeting of Monday evening, March 9th. The council adopted a
resolution in support of the two parties (Dr. Ehlen and the US
Poot Office) working together to retain the local post office
In a downtown location. They further suggested that the
Individuals complete a public survey of the citizen's desire.
Again, Mr . Scherer Is looking for a recommendation and support
to the location of the poet office.
PIDI 153 -010 -
TIP REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
12 BOUNDARIES
DISTRICT DURATION 2010
— 1 %2
(if
132—��
—�'�r'—^152
—�
' \d
I
I
� ON
JONES 0501♦
:.TANNER
QUIS-T 0501I, 10
my 151.010
O
EM87.800
OSOlIo
T 1447.68
MV
E 54000 -
T $874.30-
T EMV 166.901
1
;
T 1361.16
' I
T 1411.70
III
RIVER PARR VIEW 051170
EMV 1760ADO -
I
I
I
T {16,475.92
I
uDlln6 'k. 050111
I.
M174.6
T 1905.90
/S �¢
ILEASURE
13 �� 051y N
41.800
.�
I
E.
T $1.455.40 J
METCA F LARSON
L
'f OSOOIp► M011,1
I I
I 6
8ROA0WY PARTNERS
p0
n
I -
m�
I
(
1
I�
g g
I I. "DOI
mQ
I
I I
I
-
BROADWAY SQUARE PAJI'M
'�
I
1
(
I m
$
I 11
TT OF LIMITED t
FqV
NTI 051020 �+ `•
9071689,700 �g OFg
}II
I
I
I
70101
1100. T IU,496. 18�s7
1
J CULPi 05001}
ry� �
V' IS • TpsTi
I �
flt i
o
�T
c
619127.600
JD1V 61,6001
m� T I9.770. 16
OS 070
11971900
T 16.88898
a i F
I I I 1
'�.
1 :;t,
=
E21v . ul
1 +
T {2,270.88
i
\J.
I
3 4� 3
G 1 7 G 9� '0
6�••K sO
Broadway
TIF REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT 0 2
CURRENT POST OFFICE
BUILDING: 56 X 52 = 2,912 SQ FT
ENTRY 7 x 11 = 77 SO FT
2,989 SQ FT
DOCK AREA 1.860 S9 FT
TOTAL 4,539 SQ FT
PROPOSED POST OFFICE 7,000 SQ FT
CURRENT SITE
LOTS 4, 5, 6 A 7
LOT 8 ( 30 X 118 )
TOTAL
POSSIBLE EXPANSION
21,780 SQ FT
3.300 S9 FT
28,080 SQ FT
CITY OF MONTI (82.5 X 99) = 8,167.8 SQ FT
CULP (82.5 X 99) = 8,167.5 SQ FT
L HOLLENBECK (82.5 x 132) = 10.899 S9 gT
TOTAL 27,228 SQ FT
TOTAL POTENTIAL SITE 52,305 SQ FT
BUILDING EXPANSION 7,000 SQ FT
HRA Agenda
March 11, 1992
Consideration to Review Additional Sites for the Cotteae Home
Housina Concept.
A. Reference and Backaround.
Last week Al Larson, Everette Ellison, and Boropchak toured
Monticello for additional potential sites for redevelopment
and construction of the cottage home housing concept. The
enclosed may and information of property owners, estimated
market values (EMV), and property size has been color -coded
for your convenience.
After the HRA has agreed to earmark two or three locations,
then I suggest we invite Prestige Builders to take a look at
the locations for adequate development size, compliance with
city ordinances, and marketing features. In the same time,
preliminary numbers for costs and TIF assistance will be
determined. I assume once the NRA and the developer has
determined the project's location, agreed upon the level of
TIF assistance, and the project area has qualified as a
Redevelopment District; the HRA or the developer may want to
meet with the property owners regarding the project concept.
Recommendation is for the HRA to earmark two or three
locations for Prestige Builders to consider.
J
it
ws rJ�% I�1M�•1 �l+,r trtt', •',j��•.�.ii�: // ��1� •rr �. .i � �. .
.ti''1• ��tj-;, �,.+;,�;., ,J i'.,,. .�`� %!!r«, ;,p,, , ro •r _ 1, i 1 / ,/t,r 1•\ -4�. -
7z/�`� �' •� -.... j q ,j yyi•`r� a"4c%, ''t r. � '� r �!r rrj' � � .t f •�!' + "M'1 r� � `1 ���' ��'..� ,'
,- ,.' ���y! � �(�� , I�j'jT`•� ��, ,t,� � !ry: �^r� 7 ']� rli!% � _� 1 1..�n"^r.' "�1 .�
� '^" �' � �N ````'''���++++----::::JJJJ t r `� r. .•r.�• •� ` :�•'+�� r; �; „ F sr � rl' +1�'"t f: Jl��� r7`•!�r. `"�„�5 ' " H
�����; � �Ol�1t' «._.7��f1.. 1.,,..�,t1! �., �g%,.K�i �i'1 ; �rt' '?i' r G`�J ''` • �i�...' `�
.. y� 1r"� �J.'•--.`� i ��""��II�� �lr ...a��, 1f "�'}`•i — �j., ^;:J• JH:. •J. N (/{'j
�� '}•1. In-'"`'�V., .,`�� '!r-.7 r��� ���`J'4II �';;.•�1 +ljl� \w 'r'""�., ``�o �.'
HIGHWAY
A
I
BLOCK::51
6131,900
32,670 or
PROPERTY
LOTS
EMV S 0_ 0 R
Jones
Lot 14 & 15
$83,800
ACREAGE
200 West River
Street
Anderson
Hawkins
So 1/2
of i & 2
$36,300
Warner
No 1/2
of 1 & 2
$71,300
APARTMENT
3,4,&5
Pratt
4 V. - t -Street
$66,100
Schleif
6 & 7
419-,600�
$39,100
O'Connor
7 & 8
$52,800
Kruse (Fire)
No 9 &
10
$52,300
Bostic
So 9 &
10
39,100
$183,300 54,450 or
1.25 acres
(TIP DISTRICT and good. tie-in to Block 55) 300 West River
Street
Quist Lot 11 & 12 $51,000
Part of
Hollenbeck S 1/2 of 11 & $34,000
12
Tanner Lot 13 846,900
Page 1
0
6131,900
32,670 or
3/4 acre
Jones
Lot 14 & 15
$83,800
AUAXW;45�3(Most marketable) 300 W River
Street
Anderson
1 & 1/2 of 2
$43,800
Hollenbeck (new sid)1/2
of 2 & 3
$54,000
Lundborg
4
$48,700
Pratt
5
$66,100
419-,600�
54,450 or
1.25 acres
300 W Front Street
Pratt
some of 6 & 7
$14,000
Boman
other 6 & 7
$47,900
Thimmest
8
$46,000
Schwietering
So 9 & 10
$71,700
Hass
No 9 & 10
040,400
$433,000
108,900 or
2.5 acres
Page 1
0
41LOCt 9 (Most substandard) 600 West 6
Street
Solberg
3
$21,400
Gates
d
$21,900
Florell
5
$60,8007
Decker
6 6 7
$27,500
$111,600
54,650 or
1.25 acres
BLOC[=10 - 500
West 6 Street (Most substandard)
Straw
1,2,1/2 of 3
$ 8,600
Munson
$33,000
$41,600
27,225 or
1/6 of
acre
-'11 (Moet
substandard) 400 West
6 Street
Bialke
1
$44,000
Schultz
2
$46,100
Huseby
3
$27,400
Allen
4 8 some 5
$41,200
$1581000
45,078 or
1.03 acres
8 (Good
location to commercial,
zoned B4 (Regional Business)
Cedar Street between 3rd and 4th
Grandall
4, w 56 ft
$40,300
Lahr
5
$49,300
Lindberg
6 a 22ft of 7
$50,200
$139,800
34,485 or
1/8 acre
Page 2
BLOCK 2, LOWER MONTI 600 East Broadway (NO)
Holker S 100 ft of Lots $104,400
1, 2, 3, & 4
McIntosh Lots 5, 6, 7, & $79,600
E 1/2 of 8
McCormick W 1/2 of 8, 9 & 10 $55,600
BLOCK 3, LOWER MONTI 500 East Broadway (NO)
Ertel Lot 1, 2, E 24 ft $68,800
of Lot 3
Holker W 9 ft of Lot 3, $59,700
4 & 3
Olson (911ghted) Late 6, 7, 8, & $47,900
E 5 ft of 9
Witschen W 28 ft of 9 & 10 $72,700
BLOCK 4, LOWER MONTI 400 East Broadway (Possibility)
McClellan Lots 1, 2, & 3 $52,800
Domke Late 4, 5, & 6 $53,400
Witschen Lots 7 & 8 $40,000
Lindberg Lots 9 & 10 $60,500
$206,700 54,450 or
1.25 acres
BLOCK 5, LOWER MONTI 900 East Broadway (Possibility)
Bachler (Born)
Lots 1 & 2
$109,400
Dorf
Lots 3 & 4
$58,500
Jensen (For Sale)
Lot 5 & 6
$53,500
Dorf
8 100
Dahlheimer
Lots 7 & 8
$47,600
Trunnell
Lots 9 & 10
048,200
$317,300 54,450 or
1.25 acres
4WOMK-k-, ORIGINAL
PLAT 200 East 3rd
and 4th Street (Possibility)
Exception Moeford Building
Patrick
Lot 1
$46,700
Erickson
Lot 2
$45,100
Yager
Lot 3
$37,200
Klein
Lot 4
$72,600
Pitt
Lot 5
$41,400
Major
Lots 6 & 7
$53,700
Olson
Lot 8
S4x,qOO
$338,600 87,120 or
2 acres
Page 3
43L= 9. ORIGINAL PLAT 6th Street and Elm Street (Check)
Unable to find
Rowland
Lot 2 & 3
$35,800
Miller
Lot 4
$64,900
Stelbrach
Lot 5
$61,000
Link
Lots 6, 7, 8,
$71,700
9 & 10
Ruff
Part of
$ 200
$233,400
Pape 4
1 RRA Agenda
March 11, 1992
5. Consideration to Elect 1992 HRA Officers.
A. Reference and Backaround.
Annual election of HRA chairperson and vice chairperson.
6. ConsideratAon of an Update oq the Reauest for Proposal to
Certified Tank Removal Contractors.
A. Reference and Backaround.
Enclosed is a copy of the letter mailed March 6 to certified
tank removal contractors and a list of those contractors.
March 6, 1992
Service West Contracting
P 0 Box 31
Elk River, MN 88330
Dear Sir:
On behalf of the Monticello Housing and Redevelopment Authority
(HRA), I ask your company to submit a response to the HRA's
request. The HRA requests a cost estimate for the completion of an
Environmental Assessment or Property Inventory of a 1.77 acre site
which would meet both the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
(MPCA)/Petro Fund and the Environmental Protection
Agency(EPA)/Super Fund Law requirements.
Prior to the opening of Interstate 94, the mayor route between the
Metro and St. Cloud was Highway 182 and during those years the
property housed a cut-rate gas station and repair facility. It is
my understanding, that the gao station sold diesel, regular, and
premium gasoline. I have been told the underground tanks were
pumped dry and filled with sand, however, this has never been
verified. I believe the concrete islands still remain. The
property has never been served with City sewer and water,
consequently, a private well sand septic system exist somehwere on
the site. The residential properties to the Immediate east and
west also have private oyetemo.
In about 1977 the property changed ownership and a auto repair and
restoration shop was in operation until about a year ago. At one
time nearly one -hundred vehicles were parked on the site.
Currently, the property has been forfeited to the State of
Minnesota by the Wright County Auditor's Office for property tax
forfeiture. I don't believe the underground tanks have ever been
registered at the County or the PCA.
Service West Contracting
March 6, 1992
Since the propety is located in the City of Monticello, the HRA is
interested in this parcel for a possible Redevelopment District,
but they have no plans to be the responsible party for tank
removal, sampling/boring, or clean-up costs. However, at this time
they are requesting cost estimates, only, for completion of a
required Environmental Assessment or Property Inventory Study which
will be used as a planning aid.
As a MPCA Certified Underground Storage Tank Contractor, please
submit cost estimates to complete the following:
I. Property Audit (History)
II. Environmental Assessment and/or Property Inventory:
A. Locate and show location all underground tanks and
state number of underground tanks.
B. Verify if the underground tanks were pumped dry and
filled with sand.
C. Locate gas dispenser islands and state number of
Islands.
D. Estimate costs for tank(s) removal including
permits and disposal, concrete removal, and site
restoration.
E. Determine the number of soil samplings, borings, or
tests required to determine soil contamination due
to petroleum tank leaks and due to solvent leaks or
spills such as battery lead, oil/brake fluids, and
metal scraps as required by law.
F. Estimate costs for number of soil
samples/boringe/tests (lateral and/or vertical)
Including a qualified technician's time, equipment
rental, certified chemistry or lab testing/analysis
and paper/reporting costs as required by law.
0. Locate existing water wells on the property.
H. Determine the number of water samplings, borings,
or testa required to determine contamination of
ground water or nearby drinking water inclusive of
estimated costs.
I. Estimate the costa for completion of an
Environmental Tank Cloeure Report.
J. Determine and estimate all costs, not limited to
the above list, which may be required by the PCA or
EPA for underground tank removal and sampling to
determine contamination of soils due to petroleum
or solvent leakage/spillage.
Page 2
Service West Contracting
March 6, 1992
A site map Is enclosed for your review. If you have any questions
regarding the HRA's request, please don't hesitate to call me at
(612) 295-2711 or METRO 333-5739. It is the IiRA's intent to review
and retain on file the cost estimates submitted for potential
project authorization in the future.
Please submit the request by Friday, March 27, 1992, to the:
Monticello Housing and Redevelopment Authority
ATTN: 011ie Koropchak
250 Bast Broadway
P 0 Box 1147
Monticello, MN 55362
Thank you for your consideration of the request.
Respectfully,
CITY OF MONTICELLO
011ie Koropchak
Economic Development Director
HRA Executive Director
CC: File
Page 3
Service West Contracting
March 6, 1992
SERVICE WEST CONTRACTING
PO BOX 31
ELK RIVER, NN 53330
HRS CONSTRUCTION INC
23605 COUNTY ROAD 10
LORETTO, MN 55357
SCHLUENDER CONSTRUCTION
ROUTE 4 P 0 BOX 303
MONTICELLO, MN 35362
KELLYS EXCAVATING INC
P 0 BOX 7822
ST CLOUD, MN 56302-7822
R L LARSON EXCAVATING, INC.
HAST
ST CLOUD, MN 56304 - tt - o S
Germundsen Companies, Inc.
20142 156th Street North
Elk River, MN 55330
Page 4
-- - - - -- - Ut lstness Developiiteiii Services, Inc.
January 27, 1992
Ms. 011ie Koropchak
City of Monticello
250 Past Broadway
P.O. Box 1147
Montioello, MN 55362
STAT'_1 WN'
Consulting Services -January 17, 19921hrougb Febnrary 15, 1992
Ar>?plax Hou
1117192
LPK-Discussion with Jerry Schoen and 011ie re: commitment to Monticello .75
1/20192
12X-Follow-up/Phone conversation re: Aroplax
Total Hours. 2.00
Marketing -Non -Billable
1/24/92
PWP-Modem Molding and Micro-T"h, review with 011ie 1.25
lid Charphble Kuwa Q{• 27511wr
$1.50.00
TOTAL AMOUNT DUE $150.00
CURRF:. =11-11 QVI"R id1 UYU&M
$150.00
TERMS: NET DUE UPON RECE:PT. 1.3396 PER MONTH SERVICE CHARGE ON
PAST DUE ACCOUNTS
0980 SpinprookDrtvo§8uilo?X@Wwapu4s. MN55437@Plww:012780.6151@Fax:706.9074
a
-' ��'•rf �' ' it ' •'
;�t , l� ) •i,., i,� rC"n`°.' (rJJii �r�l ~(J � :p �. • 1 j •l l l ' 1
t•r � � •1 �q b �%.''ir.^.. rMf Fi'i t:j4 , I �•�.,�,; �(� �'t `' - - \`\
t �,:. •� � r~•wl ~b( _; .; , 1`r ,' ,J, • ( J,�..t •r t'!'{`,uj'. �'\
•\ ", • � ""'`.�, .•rte .j� . , E, ', ' r., I�;Tt» .(Iji',*' j...:,,':{'"�r,�. r ' f ,�l` -w � -' '1
r\-51V�4,•�t �b. •Jµ �.t� «�_,i j( t%i 1'!�,,r�� II'�,.• �� �"�'�O � �
4 ' �L «„" ., � '^.-w .tip• « C ~y `• �� ••� Wr
. .aa _ fit. 1 '+� •I �' C -.r. { sr .ljJ � '.�•. � f' t,
r �� .A • r • rT _
y ;
HIGHWAY
(BLOCK 54
PROPERTY LOTS
Hawkins
So 1/2 of 1 & 2
Warner
No 1/2 of 1 & 2
APARTMENT
3,4,&5
Schleif
6 & 7
O'Connor
7 & 8
Kruse (Fire)
No 9 & 10
Bostic
So 9 & 10
<BL= 55 '
Anderson 1 & 1/2 of 2
Hollenbeck (new aid)1/2 of 2 & 3
Lundborg 4
Pratt 5
Pratt some of 6 & 7
Boman other 6 & 7
Thimmest 8
Schwietering So 9 & 10
Hass No 9 & 10
Solberg
Oates
Florell
Decker
3
4
5
6 & 7
R
$36,300
$71,300
$39,100
$52,800
$52,300
39,100
$183,300
843,800
$54,000
$48,700
$66,100
$14,000
$47,900
846,000
$71,700
940,400
$433,000
$21,400
$21,900
$40,800?
527,500
$111,600
BLOCK 10
Straw 1,2,1/2 of 3 8 8,600
Munson 833,000
$41,600
S Q 0 R
ACREAGE
54,650 or
1.25 acres
108,900 or
2.5 acres
54,450 or
1.25 acres
27,225 or
1/6 of
acre
BLOCS -1-1
Bialke1 $44,000
Schultz 2 $46,100
Auseby 3 $27,400
Allen 4 & some S $41,200
$188,000
BLOCS 33
Orandall 4, w 56 ft $40,300
Lahr 5 $49,300
Lindberg 6 & 22ft of 7 $50,200
$139,800
45,078 or
1.03 acres
34,485 or
1/8 acre
March 2, 1992
Dear HRA Member:
The March HRA meeting has tentatively been reschodulod from March
O to Wednesday. March 11. 7:OOPM ae not to conflict with the
Planning Commission meeting and March 4th being Ash Wednesday.
Thank you for consideration of the change.
Sincerely,
ct)Q n. Kuno
011ie Koropchak
HRA Executive Director