HRA Agenda 05-13-1996 Special JointAGENDA
SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND HRA
Monday, May 13, 1996 - 5:30 P.M.
City Counci Chambers
MEMBERS: Mayor Brad Fyle and Councilmembers Shirley Anderson, Clint Herbst, Tom
Perrault, and Brian Stumpf.
HRA MEMBERS: Chairperson Al Larson, Vice Chairperson Brad Barger, Tom St.
Hilaire, and Roger Carlson.
GUESTS: Mark Ruff, Publicorp, Inc.
John Komemk, Developer.
I. CONSIDERATION TO REVIEW FOR APPROVAL THE OVERALL CONCEPT
PLAN FOR THE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT KNOWN AS PRAIRIE WEST.
A. ESTABLISHMENT OF TIF DISTRICT NO. 1-20, A REDEVELOPMENT
DISTRICT.
B. COMMITMENT OF A LOCAL CONTRIBUTION RELATING TO THE
CITY PARCEL.
C. ACCEPTANCE OF THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 14(H) WEST
BROADWAY FOR USE AS GREEN SPACE.
C
CITY COUNCIL AND HRA AGENDA
� MAY 13, 1996
1 l' '. :.L1. 1. 1 . - r: .Ill t I . .1 i.. y .P 11 91
A. Reference and Back8mund:
At the HRA meeting of May I. 1996, the commissioners approved entering into a
Preliminary Agreement with the developer. Cednss Creek Craftsman. Inc. (John
Komemk). The agreement authorizes Publicorp. Inc. to begin preparation for
establishment of the TIF District and Kennedy & Graven to begin preparation of the
Private Redevelopment Contract. A Preliminary Agreement has been executed by
both parties and the developer has delivered a cashier's check in the amount of
$5AX)in order to secure payment of costs incurred by the HRA. Prior to incurring
any costs, the commissioners requested a special meeting with Councilmembers to
review for approval the overall concept plan of the redevelopment project area. It
is important to remember and focus on the overall goals of this redevelopment
project: Removal of blight, increase property values, and create a public green
space.
For the purpose of identifying the overall concept plan, the project area is divided
into four additions: 1st Addition, original Prairie West. 2nd Addition, proposed TIF
District; 3rd Addition, City parcel: and 4th Addition, 14(q) West Broadway.
Council perviously approved the final plat for Prairie West, I st Addition. The I st
Addition is a pan of the overall concept plan; however, the I st Addition is financed
strictly through private dollars.
Mark Ruff, a development consultant/Financial advisor with Publicorp, Inc., (an
association of Ehlers and Associates. Inc.) will be present at the meeting to provide
additional insight. Additionally, John Komemk, the developer, will be present.
ESTABLISHMENT OF TIF DISTRICT NO. 1-20. A REDEVEIAPMENT
DISTRICT.
The proposed TIF District No. 1-20 boundary, o Redevelopment District, includes
the Ilanowalt and Banyai properties and the easterly small parcel of the City lot and
is identified as the 2nd Addition. The maximum life duration of a Redevelopment
District is 25 years; however, the proposed $1300X) (NPV) TIF assistance is
amortized over 2() years. The projected tax increment is sufficient to retire the HRA
debt service based on the proposed construction of 6 units valued at $I3()AX)each
and 4 units valued at $1SOAH)each. Filly percent of the traits will he constructed in
7
Page I
CITY COUNCIL AND HRA AGENDA
MAY 13. 1996
1997 and the remaining 50% constructed in 1998. The developer has purchase
agreements on both the Hanawalt and Banyai properties. The existing buildings will
either be moved or demolished by the developer.
It has been determined through a Prairie West Feasibility Analysis completed by
Publicorp. Inc. that the project requires HRA assistance in the amount of $130.(99)
plus the city property in order for the developer to receive a total sales return of
6.5`16. Typical development returns are 9.5%. Without HRA assistance and the city
property, the return is 2.1 %. The proposed TIF District satisfies the "but for" test.
Consideration: To approve the concept plan for establishment of TIF District No.
1-20, a Redevelopment District, as presented.
At a later date, the Council will call and hold a public hearing for adoption of a
resolution establishing the TIF District.
COMMITMENT OF A LOCAL CONTRIBUTION RELATING TO THE CITY
PARCEL.
This parcel is the westerly larger parcel owned by the City (previous Gille property)
and is identified as the 3rd Addition. This parcel is not included in the TIF District
because a resolution was not adopted prior to demolition of the structure and clean-
up of the underground tanks finding the property was occupied by a structurally
substandard building and providing a three-year window for inclusion in a TIF
District.
As stated above, the redevelopment project requires HRA assistance plus the city
property. A City can avoid a HACA loss if it commits to a local contribution of at
least 5 % of the expected tax increment. The City of Monticello used S35.188) of
general fund dollars to clean up this city owned parcel. If the City gifted S20,INH)of
the value of its property and received a payment of $15,1981, the HACA penalty
would be avoided and the city would receive some compensation for HACA losses
in other districts in addition to tax revenues from the 19 units of housing not
included in the TIF District. Mr. Ruff is available to the Council for questions
relating to the IIACA Penalty.
Considerations 1'o commit a local contribution gifting $20,(8H1 of the value of the
City owned property.
4
Page 2
CITY COUNCIL AND HRA AGENDA
MAY 13. 1996
Although the city owned parcel is not within the boundary of proposed TIF District
No. 1-20, the local contribution is anticipated to be a provision of the Private
Redevelopment Contract.
ACCEPTANCE OF THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1400 WEST
BROADWAY FOR USE AS GREEN SPACE.
This property located at 1400 West Broadway (Katzmarek parcel) is the last piece
of the redevelopment puzzle and is identified as the 4th Addition. This parcel is not
included in the proposed TIF District because the parcel does not abutt the
identified District No. 1-20 boundary. A separate TIF District is not proposed, as
a portion of the 1400 West Broadway parcel is non -buildable, therebye, generating
little or no tax increment. Lastly, the 1400 West Broadway parcel was not included
in the Prairie West Feasibility Analysis and is a priority project of the HRA.
At the May meeting, the NRA commissioners approved acquisition of the 10) West
Broadway property with the intent to deed the property to the City for use as green
space. It is my understanding, the Parks Commission is aware of the proposed green
space and has a preliminary concept plan for development of the park in its natural
habitat (prairie gross.) This a carry -through of the prairie grass and natural habitat
along the pedestrian/bike trail running westerly towards NSP and the Montissippi
Park. It is anticipated the public park would be accessible to trail users only.
Mr. Ruff will suggest the HRA clean-up the parcel prior to the HRA transfer of the
deed to the City. The amount of the purchase price including estimated relocation
costs; attorney, relocation consultant, and appraisal fees associated with the eminent
domain process; and the public goodwill created by eliminating the eminent domain
process is $145,(X)0. The acquisition and clean-up costs are proposed as
compensation for previous or future HACA losses.
Consideration- To accept the property located at 14M West Broadway for use as
green space.
Again, it is important to remember and focus on the overall goals of this
redevelopment project: Removal of blight, increase property values, and create a
public green space. Prior to moving ahead on the overall concept plan for
redevelopment of Prairie West, the HRA requested a meeting with the City Council
to discuss the project for conceptual approval.
Page 3
CITY COUNCIL AND NRA AGENDA
MAY 13. 1996
B. Alternative Action:
Approve the overall concept plan for the redevelopment project known as
Prairie West.
a) Establishment of TIF District No. 1-20.a Redevelopment District.
b) Commitment of a local contribution relating to the City parcel.
c) Acceptance of the property located at 14110 West Broadway for use as
green space.
2. Approve the overall concept plan for the redevelopment project known as
Prairie West with certain modifications.
3. Deny the overall concept plan for the redevelopment project known as Prairie
West.
4. Table any action.
C. Recommendatoon.
The Assistant Administrator and the HRA Members and Executive Director
recommend Alternative No. I as the overall concept plan meets the goals of a
redevelopment project. Additionally, the project is a win/win for the city and a local
developer. Lastly, a local lending institution has agreed, conceptually, to participate.
D. Su=rtina Data:
Copy of a map outlining the four additions of the redevelopment project and copies
of the information submitted to the HRA as prepared by Mark Ruff.
C Page 4
14k� .JEST BROAIYWAX
-CITY, PAkEb,,, 3RD ADDITION
EASTERLY_ CITY PARCEL BANYAI.
I - PROPOSED
�ND I ANA�ALT PROPERTIES
TIF DISTRICT NO. 1-20, 2ND ADDITION
Total U', -I1
r IST ADDITION
ou
IPA,.
PRAIRIE WEST aft
016111LOT A
RPR 29 '96 12:16PM EA.ERS & RSSOCIRTES P.2/6
INMEWML
10 LE not Rt IN PUBLIC IF 11 AMCI
April 27, 1996
TO: 011ie Koropehak, City of Monticello
FR: Mark Ruff
RE: Revised Prairie West Analysis
Attached is a revised analysis of the Prairie West redevelopment project. The fust change is that the number
of units in the tax increment district is less than previously projected. Instead of 12 units, the units in the
district boundaries will be 10 out of the 29 total units. Attached is a projection which shows that the tax
increment over 15 years would be S 116,000 at a 8.5% into" rate and S13S,000 over 20 years.
We have also reviewed Mr. Kornarek's pro forma and have fotmd that a total of S 135,000 in assistance with
$65,000 of initial assisnocc and 565.000 of pay-as-you-go plus the value of the City land would be justifiable
for a reasonable maim on the project based upon inform on coats and revenues provided by Mr. Komarek.
Without HRA assistance the reams an total sake to the developer would be 2.1 %. With HRA assistance, the
$130,000 plus the City property would provide a 6.5% development fee to Mr. Komarek, not including any
fees he may pay to hbnsdf for construction management or broker, if any. This amount is lower than a typical
town house development fee of 9.5% for this type of product.
The method of delivery of the usisronce and the timing of the up -front payments are yet to be f aWizcd. Mr.
Komarek has requested that 50% of the $63,000 in up-fralt assistance be paid at the time of closing on the
pruparties in the proposed tax increment districts (die Hanawan and Bmyai propertin) and SO% at the time
ofconsuirctionofmadimprovements for the fust phase oftheproject. Weamrecommending that theup•front
assistance be paid ac three increments. A portion would be paid at closing, approximately 1110,000 per unit
be paid at the compladon of construction on each twlnhome or quad until the 565,000 limit is reached. The
remaining $65,000 of auistace would be paid over 10 years to Mr. Komarek. The attached cash Flows on
the total project have assumed a general payout schedule which will nced to be rolled.
The HRA would also be repaid its 1165,000 out oftu ineremeat over 20 years. The priority of payments to
the City or the pay-as-you-go note will also be finalized. We recommend that the split be 60/40
(HRA/devcloper) with HRA receiving at least enough to amortize its debt over 20 yearn.
As you arc aware, the City can avoid a HACA lou if it commits to a local contribution of at least 5% of the
expected tax Increment. It is our understanding that the City has used $35,000 of general Rind dollars to ekan
up the City owned property involved with this project. If tho City were to giR 520,000 of the value of the City
awed property mad receive a payment of approximately $15.000. the HACA penalty would be avoided and
the City would receive some compensation for HACA losses in other districts to addition tow revenues fiom
the 19 units of housing not included in a tax increment district.
We expect that a public hearing on tM establishment of the tax Increment district will not behold prior to the
signing of a development agnxment. We recommend that the issues of sablishing a tax increment district
and the City trensfn of the City owned land be discussed at the May 13th City Council meating to ensure that
the City Council will approve a tax increment district if the HRA signs a developmem agreement: with Mr.
Komarek prior to the end of June. Please call with any questions or comments.
OFFIe[9 IN YDiNEAPOLIS. a1M AND BROOKFIELD, col
2950 Norwnt linter. 90 $outs 8avent11Street . Minn"Dolls. MN 5aap2•4100
reloWwonD 612.339.8291. FAX 612.339415&
P761rrW40 F4 bW._.;:w YN01a16 N91A As4b1�o
J
1410196 7rtlO109 bWII00 "096 Iw0197 2r.KMI 3.dOt97 404297 I4 M V.MM 3.0!90 thOM 1ROM 2.00199 TOT.
1.A d Ud1
a Two SNW Q04d
N4r.gm d Urdb Edd
S" d 8460-d (W*w b - SIM)
Sd4 d Apar (Oo4d4 - $132%)
MRA R44e ~ncn%
T0il1L6AlEs ---
D19PER616ENTS
lrrd P- . PnYY Wod
laid Pm - IIF 201ra
L1wd Prot. - C1q SWM
S. -Y are TM40n0
01126.464
611. R.Ow b 1
U40wwap9p
rw� U16W 4
.taro 4q • AbiiJ4Y/bn
i 11rr1
3aa41 Con44uctbn
4p.1 Fop
?.*n aayn 6 D-bm-d
DWldap W Ea BuMd/
D4411-dC-i Cop
Aran Canty : -
TOTILLbILWIERLYOUMV_ _ _
OUARIERLV GROSS 4C04E
GROSS RETURN ON LOST
Y4watl oa4l(10%)
a Bu*- p%)
OUARIERLY NET DKIDUE
NET RE TURN OM COSI
,LOAM SUA/ME
m
N
48!'96 PO4- TV P16a,-WEMaw P.D. 1
2
2
2
J
O
J
J
2
,
2
] 71
0
4
e
J
2
t
J
4
2
J
7
t
]
] 29
312,000
312.000
]12,000
]12.000
0
]12,000
312.000
0
]12.000
312.000
3121
466,000 3.27e,00D
0
0
0
0
526.000
0
0
920.000
0
0
0
0 1,056.000
0
tl 0]3!.400
717,000
312.000
3-120OD-sae0006211000
_�LI2,000
j__IZOm _312
000 _
1n 4,j)2,.
0,
70.1137
30.913
70.6]]
30.033
30.637
30.673
- - -161.M
190.000
196aoD
34.500
34.500
3000
13.000
16.000
10.000
10.000.
2,a00
7,ODD i
4.000
4.000
4.000
4.OW
6.000
4.000
4.000
4,0D0
4.000
4,o90
4.000
6400 54.00o,
1 280
9,325
30,5361
13, tao
414100
30,000
91.250,
17.700
16.600
30.500
6000
6.000
t5A00
15.000
30000
240.000
740.000
346000
240.000
14D,000
24D,0110
MA00
240.000
240000
70D.000 2.570,000
_
_ 246,560__2_03
716003
24,706
430,000
339,2]3 406033
34,633
244,004
430000
43" =
_
34.000
_
21.000
744,000
690,000
IB5000 4,046W
(20.500)
(30,463)
34.907
26.7/2
p7.r33)
60.167
►,161
66,000
66000
Up00
.,000
"ADD
102.000 297.317
661%
0
6.213
1.370
6.096
4,14
3.24
SAW
2,09
SAW
4,131
7.114
1,3640
67,446
0
4.60D
SAW
4.60o
6400
17.700
SAW
9.000
31.200
9.600
SAW
SAW
14.400 135.200
(246,600)
(46.3M
19,937
11,24
(43.241)
31,2D4
(9,209)
.,311
66.94
54,260
55,626
67,014
67,600 U.272
705%
70,500
74,196
112654 _
24,663
706,610
274,VS !ea 545
137,T34
WS )40
110,471 _
115 344
0
_ o
48!'96 PO4- TV P16a,-WEMaw P.D. 1
a
NC06E
110o.0 Ul h
IT.o ISOM Quad
,N.m.r a 17110. sad
;S,..d Bomhwmd 4=kWb - 6156k)
'S.1. of Aspm (Quad. - 6132W
NM R.irbur menl-
TOTALSALES
]ISPEReMEMS
L.Roc-T w"I -_-_
1250 P,- - TT Z -
LOVA P1..- - C./ P.owty
Damdoon
Sb Rwor.9.n
l.Od..&V
Pd..R UIYa..
Englomming 1 Adnr 40ian
Jr...
1.9.1 cava
P,Wo D"W & O.wbyrrlal
t1..6ap.d l.1 Sbk"
B..rw.. Jd Caw Cap
.A.Pm C- 1 C.4
fOTAI OUARTERtYOUTt AY
QUARTERLYOROSS INCOME
GROSS RETURN ON COSI
..n.m Cal 17D%)
5140..1.(1x)
QUART L RLY NET MCOMF
4E RETURN ON COOT
LOAN BALANCE
01011"
Pam* W..1 Fem"ity y.nWT HRA Aad.b1106
1.10198 2rd0196
&00t96
MOM 1s112197
211601/7
3rd=7
1160197
1.10,91
2.dw"
3110)190
WKIM
1.10610
71M/0199 TOT --
2
2
2
i 2
0
2
2
2
2
2
-- 1 21
01
1
1
2
J
2
2
1
J
2
1
2
2
2
]12.000
312.000
311,000
]12.000
0
312.000
312.000
0
312.0m
212,000
312.000
166,000 7]76.000
0
0
0
0
63.000
0
0
529.000
0
0
0
0 1,056.000
71.600
10 Gm _
_
20.000
77,500
7,500
6169,59q
_0 34 712,000
712`00
712.000
- 312000_ 526,000
712,000
339.500
676,000 _
712,_000
_ _ _
717.000
_ ]12,000_
535.500 4SO1,6o0
0
70.67.1
76,43
36 833
30 SM
_
30.!33
10.016
184.m
190,000
190,000
31.600
31,600
7,000
ISAW
10.000
10.1
10,0
0,00028m
2.8m
2.800
1.000
4,001)
4.O00
I,om
6.000
4,000
4.0m
6,000
1.000
.000
4,000
(1,000 66,000
1,260
9,375
W630
17.160
Ie,1m
30,Dm
91,200
13.700
lepra
30.6uo
6.000
6. ODD
is ow
IBSDD
30.0001
240000
210,om
20.000
240.000
240.001)
240,000
210400
240.000
240.ODD
300,Om 2,520.0001
. YI,ODD
430,000
_ J�600
317,4]_276,09]
0A 701
21
779,737
460813
701.67]
2" Om
130,0110
2 4 WO
7744,000
_
14,020
__"DOW
366,1100 (14,667
(24,000)
(10,183)
SSADI
27,792
(7,733)
50,161
7,167
9600
90,000
16,000
66,000
88.000
160.900 166,117
1055%
0
6,750
6,918
6.171
6,180
6.127
1,616
1,997
2.915
1,279
0
0
0 11.113
0
Slow
9,em
9.600
9.600
17.200
0.600
Spm
17.200
9.000
9.000
9,600
4,100 I»2W
(24.000)
(26.437)
20.321
12.74
(31,127)
J6,210
0,116)
60.903
60.178
17.111
".100
54.100
106.100 711,901
016%
71� OOO
]36,133
210,10
706 3W
776.891
192,015
106,695
118,191
19,161
0
0
0-
_0_
A.P/ad by PLEhapl:Nha
P.D. 1
PPR 29 '96 12:17PM DIE% & PSSOCIATES
P.5/6
Ou26raa r.auae NIA 10 D.aI Ur* n a Pr yya.Iaaawom w Dano Pp. r
T.I.F. CASH FLOW ASSUMPTIONS
lrlRat m Ram,
0.0000%
Irumt Rete:
6.500%
Tu E.tarsiol Ran:
1.117890 Pray 96
Focal Otapalltlea Rab:
0.00%
BASE VALUE INFORMATION
Pay 96
Value
Parcel 0n55AM434305
105.000
Parcel 0155600-033401
54600
P- 015560G433402
Total Ottp7W Mortal Vaara
Class Rab: Nonrataac > 972.000
2.0000% Py M
f1or1MIS 1a00 < 3M2 M
1.0000% Py 96
Otlprul Tax Q4'W
1.671 Py 96
PROJECT VALUE INFORMATION
Type of Tex aroraaeme D.u1ct
RoOwabpnMra
Typo of OaaalopabnC
tlorrresaaa0
Total lata
Type d Tory Tatmy
Tam
Ma" YOkat
.—yN Tama... D^_rl Caetft.._.
Valva .Valyp PayaOM
1.5 - Famplmt BIOpa (0 Urab) 12.610 2,102
11180
M0.000 130,000
2 - T—MoMn (4 1JIIb) 10,196 2.619
9.120
600A00 160,000
0 0
0
0 0
71.11M
20,400
1.360.000 260,000 199610 2000
Aaaultaa SM% tKM b 1997 ono 50% aua n 199(1
wntloar Aaa..a A Eaeopwwww — am
PPR 29 '96 12:17PM EHLERS 8 PGSOCIATES P. 6/6
M.W.. Mu 100.v" UMf •0784.93.47 a.aNloaw+ OWM P.P 2
Y,100.01 M." w - 277
TAX LNCREMENT CASH FLOW
049.
pmi-
Capm9a
SSMI A." AdmhOW
a
Ottw
6m►MnW
NPV
Pate I
E0100
Ta
T
T"
Ta
Gnas Ta
F49
Re -e"
No Tu
Ta. 147)4271447 Dara I
Y..
cap"
C4Dru,y
C4pacaty
.-. jrKf-1L
.10.00%
01va I
:.SO%
MOt. i
( 0.0
1,673
1- $73
0
0
0
0
0
0
_ ._Yr,
02-01 1097
0.0
t.:73
1,873
0
0
0
0
0
0
0841 1997
0.0
1,613
1,473
0
0
0
0
0
0
02-0, 1098
05
1.613
1.673
0
0
0
0
0
0
08-01 1996
1.0
1.673
1,673
0
0
0
0
0
0
02-0, 1999
1.5
1.673
,o,200527
..766
(4771
0
..290
3.3.2
03-01 1999
20
1,673
10,200
:,527
1.766
(4 77)
0
4.290
6.547
02-01 2000
2.5
1,673
20.400
16.727
10.667
(1,017)
O
9.421
13.300
09-01 2000
3 0
1.673
20.400
18.727
10.467
(1,047)
0
9,421
19.777
02-01 2001
3,6
1,673
2,.00
,6.727
10.481
(1.047)
0
9.421
25.990
0"1 2001
4,0
1.673
20.400
16.727
10.467
(1.047)
0
4.04,
31.950
02-M 2002
1.5
1,673
20 400
13.727
10,487
(1.047)
0
9.421
37.667
08-01 2002
So
1.813
2,400
,8,227
10,461
(1,047)
0
9.421
43.151
02-01 2003
9.5
1,673
20.400
13,727
10,467
(1.047)
0
9421
43.111
0841 2003
6.0
1,673
20.400
18.727
10.467
(,,047)
0
9.421
53,457
02-01 2004
65
1,673
20,400
,6.721
10.467
(1,047)
0
9.421
58,297
08-01 2004
7.0
1,673
20.400
13.727
10,467
(1.04T
0
0,121
62.960
02-01 2005
7.5
1,673
20,400
ta.727
10,4a7
171047)
0
9,421
67,394
06-01 2006
00
1,673
20,400
18,727
10.167
(1,967,
0
9,421
71.aaa
02-01 2005
04.5
1,673
20.400
18,727
10.467
(1,047)
0
9421
75.764
060, 2008
9.0
1,673
20,400
,x,727
10.497
(044
0
9,42 179.608
02-01 2007
9s
1,672
20.400
18.727
10.457
0,0.7)
0
9.421
03.4"
08.01 2007
10.0
1,473
20,480
18.127
10.467
(,,047)
0
9,41
87.082
02-01 2008
10.5
1,673
20.400
78.727
10.467
(,.047)
0
9.421
90.551
08-01 2008
11,0
1,673
20.400
+6.277
10.467
(1.047)
0
9.421
93.879
02-01 2009
„ s
1.073
20.400
19.727
10.467
(1.047)
0
9. 21
97,072
08-01 2009
12.0
1.673
20,400
18.72
10,487
(1047)
0
9.421
+00034
02-01 2010
t 2,6
,,273
20..00
18.727
10.487
(1,047)
0
9,42,
,03,07,
08-01 2010
1].0
,.673
20.400
78,727
10.487
(,.047)
0
9121
105.869
02-01 201,
13.5
1.613
20,400
18.727
10.487
(1,967)
0
942,
+08.591
08-01 20„
46.0
1.673
20.400
16,12
10.-7
(,.047)
0
942,
,27.164
02.01 2012
+..5
1.673
20.400
10,72
,0. 467
11.047)
0
942,
1, 3.67,
03.61 20,2
15.0
1.873
30.400
16.777
,0.667
(1,047)
0
0.421
116.056
02-0, mU
1 15,5
,,673
20.400
18,777
10.467
(1.047)
0
9421
118.344
08-0, 2013
160
1.673
20.400
18.727
+0,167
(1,0427
0
9.41
120,339
02-01 2014
165
1.673
20.400
,6,127
10.467
(1,87)
0
9.421
,21.645
0041 20,4
170
1.173
20,400
16,727
10,467
(1.047)
0
9421
124. W4
02-0/ 20.5
17 3
1,873
20.480
18.727
10.467
0,047)
0
9.421
126.602
08-01 2015
,1.0
,.613
20,400
18.727
10.467
(,,04 7)
0
9,41
12B,4W
02-01 2016
1810
1.673
20.400
18.72
10,467
(1,047)
0
941
130.242
06-01 20+6
19.0
1.073
28.00
14721
10,467
27.00)
0
0,421
131.962
02-01 20,7
,9 s
,.873
20.400
18,277
,0,461
27,047)
0
9.42,
133,112
Oa.01 20,1
20.0
1.673
20.4.
18,11
10,4
(1,047)
0
9121
13.1
02-0, 2011
20.5
1.873
20,400
1a.727
,0.467
(1,047)
0
9.. 21
136.675
0841 2018
21.0
1,673
20.400
1a, 777
10,-7
(1.047)
0
9421
138.123
02-01 2019
21.5
1,173
20.400
16.727
10,-7
(1,0.7)
0
9.41
139.51,
o9-01 2019
72 0
1 673
".400
1:,727
10.44
(,,047)
0
9,41
+40.843
02-01 tom
22.5
1,673
20,400
13.127
10.467
1, ,0471
0
9,4,
,42.121
06.81 2020
23.0
1.673
20.400
18.rn
10.467
0,047)
0
912,
+43.346
02-0, 2021
23.5
1,673
2.400
19,3
10.467
(1,047)
0
9,.21
,41,x22
0"1 2021
24.0
,.873
20.400
U.n7
10.467
(1,041)
0
9,41
,4Q9S0
0241 2072
24.6
1,673
20.400
18,721
10,-7
11,9671
0
9,4146.732
00-01 2022
25 0
1.673
70.00
18.777
10.467 ... ---,
0.9671
0
9,421
,47 769
02.01 7073
Tom
-91,031 - - - -
(49,193)
0
"Axl
---
i
P --K Vxy"
164.146
,09.4191 0_---
Y,100.01 M." w - 277