Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
City Council Agenda Packet 07-24-2017
AGENDA REGULAR MEETING — MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, July 24, 2017 — 6:30 p.m. Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING/WORKSHOP North Mississippi Room 5 P.M. Budget Workshop Mayor: Brian Stumpf Council Members: Jim Davidson, Bill Fair, Charlotte Gabler, Lloyd Hilgart 1. General Business A. Call to Order & Pledge of Allegiance B. Approval of Meeting Minutes • Special Meeting Minutes from July 10, 2017 • Regular Meeting Minutes from July 10, 2017 C. Consideration of Adding Items to Agenda D. Citizen Comments E. Public Service Announcements/Updates • 2017-2018 Monticello Royalty Introductions • Community Partnership Grant Presentation • Movie in the Park • Construction Update F. Council Liaison Updates • BCOL • Planning Commission • EDA • MOAA • Ellison Property Committee G. Department Updates • City Administrator Update • Wright County Sheriff Quarterly Update • FiberNet Quarterly Update 2. Consent Agenda A. Consideration of approving payment of bills B. Consideration of approving new hires and departures for City departments C. Consideration of approving the sale/disposal of surplus city property D. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2017-40 accepting donations for Farmers Market, Summer Movie in the Park, and 2017 Mississippi Rampage Tournament for total of $1,095 E. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2017-44 approving the issuance of General Obligation Bonds, Series 2017A F. Consideration of approving an amendment to a Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development and Development State PUD Review for multi -tenant commercial building in a B-3, Highway Business District. Applicant: Larson, Andy/Crown Bay G. Consideration of adopting Ordinance 667 and Summary Ordinance 667A for amendments to Monticello Zoning Ordinance Chapter 5, Section 3 for regulations for accessory use outdoor storage in industrial districts. Applicant: City of Monticello H. Consideration of adopting Ordinance 672 and Summary Ordinance 672A amending the Monticello Zoning Ordinance and amending the official zoning map for rezoning from I-2 (Heavy Industrial) to Planned Unit Development for Spaeth Industrial Park, to approve a Final Stage PUD, a Final Plat for the Spaeth Industrial Park, and Development Contract for the Spaeth Industrial Park. Applicant: Spaeth, Kenneth I. Consideration of authorizing a payment to Coalition of Utility Cities for city share of CUC membership dues in the amount of $26,419 J. Consideration of approving lighting upgrades by Wes Olson for the Community Center gym for $9,750, Community Center indoor playground for $3,010, and Hi - Way Liquors for $10,055.58 (total of $22,815.58) K. Consideration of approving UHL recommissioning proposal for cost of $26,900 L. Consideration of approving modification of Greater Monticello Enterprise Fund (GMEF) Guidelines reducing equity contribution and adjusting minimum interest rate M. Consideration of approving an additional performance bond fee of $3,825 to the original quote submitted by Recreation by Lemmie Jones LLC for aquatic play structure 2A. Consideration of items removed from the consent agenda for discussion 3. Public Hearings 4. Regular Agenda A. Consideration of adopting Ordinance 673 and Summary Ordinance 673A amending the PUD, Final Stage Planned Unit Development and Final Plat for Chelsea Corner for Office, Service, and Warehouse Uses in the Red Rooster Planned Unit Development. Applicant: Red Rooster Properties B. Consideration of approving a request for Comprehensive Plan Amendment reguiding Outlot C, Otter Creek Crossing from `Places to Shop' to `Places to Work' and adopting Ordinance 669 amending the official Monticello zoning map for rezoning the subject parcel from B-4 (Regional Business) District to a I-1 (Light Industrial) District. Applicant: Jim Bowers/JX Bowers LLC; Applicant John Chadwick/John Chadwick Farms, LLC has withdrawn his application C. Consideration of approving a request for Development Stage Planned Unit Development for Vehicle Sales and Rental, Auto Repair — Minor, and Accessory Office and Retail Uses in a B-3 (Highway Business) District, including allowance for 130' flag pole height. Applicant: FRHP Lincolnshire, LLC D. Consideration of authorizing members of the City Council to participate in the upcoming I-94 Coalition lobbying effort (September 12 and 13) in Washington D.C. at an estimated cost of $1,000 per participant 5. Added Items A. CITY COUNCIL CLOSED MEETING Time: (After Regular Agenda) Topic: Sale of a portion of City -owned parcel: 213-100-081400 (former City bio - solids site) (Address: 1645 County Road 39 NE) 6. Adjournment AGENDA CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL WORSHOP MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, July 24, 2017 — 5 p.m. North Mississippi Room, MCC AGENDA 1. Call to Order 2. Purpose of Workshop: 2018 Budget Presentations 3. Adj ournment MINUTES SPECIAL MEETING — MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, July 10, 2017 — 5:30 p.m. North Mississippi Room City Hall - Monticello Community Center Present: Brian Stumpf, Jim Davidson, Bill Fair, Charlotte Gabler, Lloyd Hilgart Absent: None Others: City staff. Jeff O'Neill, Wayne Oberg, Angela Schumann, Shibani Bisson, Rachel Leonard, Tom Moores, Sarah Rathlisberger, Tracy Ergen, Matt Theisen, Carolyn Granger, and Jim Thares 1. Call to Order Mayor Brian Stumpf called the special meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. 2. 2018 Budget Introduction Wayne Oberg, Finance Director, introduced budget discussion for 2018. He led the presentation with a projected schedule for the budget process, levy information, and potential budget impacts. These impacts include the possibility of additional police hours and new hires of Public Works Director, Engineer, and Full-time Fire Chief. The format for budget presentations will relate to the newly developed strategic goals. The goals are: Create and Preserve Sustainable Livability; Build a Connected Community; Strengthen Our Image as a Destination; Support a Vibrant Economy; Be a Regional Leader; and Invest in People. 3. Budget Presentations Wayne Oberg presented the Hi -Way Liquors budget. The presentation touched on the liquor store's involvement in the community and Chamber of Commerce, the contribution to city funds, and workload measures. Carolyn Granger, Deputy Registrar Manager, presented the DMV budget. She revealed performance measures for the DMV along with measurable workload items. Wayne Oberg commented that the DMV processes more transactions with fewer hours worked versus previous years due to the good management of the department. 4. Adjournment By consensus the meeting was adjourned at 6:15 p.m. Recorder: Jennifer Schreiber Approved: Attest: City Council Special Meeting Minutes—July 10, 2017 City Administrator REGULAR MEETING — MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, July 10, 2017 — 6:30 p.m. Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center Present: Brian Stumpf, Jim Davidson, Bill Fair, Charlotte Gabler, and Lloyd Hilgart Absent: None. 1. General Business A. Call to Order & Pledge of Allegiance Mayor Stumpf called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. All City Councilmembers were present. B. Approval of Meeting Minutes Special Meeting Minutes from June 26, 2017 Councilmember Gabler moved approval of the June 26, 2017, special city council meeting minutes. Councilmember Fair seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Regular Meetiag Minutes from June 26, 2017 Councilmember Gabler moved approval of the June 26, 2017, regular city council meeting minutes. Councilmember Fair seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. C. Consideration of Adding Items to the Agenda • None. D. Citizen Comments • Sue Anderson, Monticello Soccer Club, acknowledges City Council and city staff for their efforts in the development of the BCOL Athletic Complex. E. Public Service Announcements • Anna Bohanon, Wright County, provided an update on: Live Wright; Regional Active Living; community health survey; and Regional Active Transportation. • Riverfest celebration is July 13-16, 2017. • The following movie in the park events are scheduled: Moana will be played on July 29 and is sponsored by Fibernet; and Sing! was rescheduled for August 11 and is hosted by Camping World and All Elements, Inc. City Council Minutes—July 10, 2017 Page 1 1 6 Bertram Blast is looking for volunteers for the race. Construction Update: Shibani Bisson, WSB/City Engineer, commented on TH 25/7th Street Intersection project which will be complete by end of the week. She added that the city is receiving positive feedback from the community in regard to the new monument on the corner of TH 25 and 7th Street. F. Council Liaison Updates • Highway 25 Coalition — Mayor Stumpf updated on the following items: 1) Distribution of Highway 25 Coalition Flyer; 2) Coalition's work plan for 2018; 3) Update on Monticello Downtown Area Study; 4) Coalition's budget for 2018; and 5) Updates from MnDOT and Tom Emmer's office. • BCOL — meeting was rescheduled for July 14, 2017. G. Department Updates Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator, provided updates on the following: 1. The city has been contacted by Hillside Farms neighborhood in regard to information on installation of a trail. Mr. O'Neill will contact Wright County to find out timeline on roadway and will report back. 2. At a special City Council meeting on July 24, 2017, the Wright County Sheriff's Office will present a request for additional hours. Their quarterly update will be presented at the regular meeting. 3. City phones are in the process of being updated. Mr. O'Neill thanked staff, specifically Rachel Leonard, and Arvig for implementation. 4. A closed meeting is being scheduled for July 24, 2017 following the regular City Council meeting. The meeting is in regard to the sale of biosolids site. 2. Copsent Agenda Councilmember Fair moved to remove item 4A and list under the Consent Agenda as item M. Councilmember Gabler seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Councilmember Gabler moved approval of the Consent Agenda excluding items I and J. Councilmember Davidson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. A. Consideration of approving the payment of bills. Recommendation: Approved the bill and purchase card registers for a total amount of $1,382,001.50. B. Consideration of approving new hires/departures. Recommendation: Approved the hires for MCC, Liquor Store, and Engineering. C. Consideration of approving the sale/disposal of surplus city property. Recommendation: No report this cycle. City Council Minutes —July 10, 2017 Page 2 1 6 D. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2017-30 accepting a donation from the Ellison family of property located at 707 West Broadway with an estimated market value of $169,600. Recommendation: Adopted Resolution 2017-30 accepting a donation from the Ellison family of property located at 707 West Broadway. E. Consideration of approving individual pension contribution amounts for Volunteer Firefighter Relief Association members. Recommendation: Approved setting the 2017 pension benefit level at $3,900 for current Fire Relief Association members and the deferral rate at 2.5% for past members with acknowledgement that future benefit levels shall be adjusted to maintain healthy surpluses and avoid deficits. F. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2017-39 approving the release of temporary easement located in Lot 6, Auditor's Subdivision No. 1. Recommendation: Adopted Resolution 2017-39 approving the release of temporary easement located in Lot 6, Auditor's Subdivision No. 1. G. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2017-31 calling for a public hearing on August 14, 2017, for vacation of a portion of drainage and utility easements as legally described for Monticello Big Lake Community Hospital District Second Addition. Recommendation: Adopted Resolution 2017-31 accepting the petition and calling for a public hearing on Monday, August 14, 2017, to consider the vacation of a portion of drainage and utility easements over and across Lot 1, Block 1, Monticello Big Lake Community Hospital District Campus Second Addition. H. Consideration of approving amendment to Conditional Use Permit for Final Stage Planned Unit Development for entrance and building additions in a B-2 (Limited Business) District and an encroachment agreement for building entrance. Applicant: Lemke, Lenore — CentraCare Health Monticello. Recommendation: Adopted Resolution 2017-36 approving an amendment to Conditional Use Permit for Development Stage Planned Unit Development for CentraCare Health Monticello, contingent on compliance with the findings in resolution and conditions specified in Exhibit Z and approved the encroachment agreement for entrance canopy and drive area for CentraCare Health Monticello. I. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2017-32 authorizing preparation of a feasibility report for improvements to Chelsea Road (between TH 25 and Fallon Avenue) (estimated cost of $85,000). Recommendation: ITEM WAS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA. Consideration to adopting Resolution 2017-33 authorizing preparation of a feasibility report for improvements to 7th Street (Cedar Street to west of Washington Street) and Cedar Street (south of 7th Street) (estimated cost of City Council Minutes —July 10, 2017 Page 3 1 6 $35,000). Recommendation: ITEM WAS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA. K. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2017-35 declaring the official intent of the City of Monticello to reimburse certain expenditures from the proceeds of bonds to be issued by the city for Chelsea Road (west of Fallon Avenue to TH 25) utility and street improvements and 7th Street (Cedar Street to west of Washington Street and Cedar Street (south of 7th Street) street improvements. Recommendation: Approved Resolution 2017-35 declaring the official intent of the City of Monticello to reimburse certain expenditures from the proceeds of bonds to be issued by the city for the Chelsea Road (west of Fallon Avenue to TH 25) utility and street improvements and 7' Street (Cedar Street to west of Washington Street) and Cedar Street (south of 7 t Street) street improvements. L. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2017-37 accepting the bid and awarding a contract for the 2017 stoplight painting project to Pole Painting Plus of Albertville in the amount of $33,800. Recommendation: Adopted Resolution 2017-37 accepting the bid and awarding contract to Pole Painting Plus of Albertville, MN based on their bid of $33,800. M. Consideration of a request for Comprehensive Plan Amendment requiding Outlots C & D, Otter Creek Crossing from `Places to Shop' to `Places to Work' and a request for rezoning the subject parcels from a B-4 (Regional Business) District to a I-1 (Light Industrial) District. Applicant: Jim Bowers and John Chadwick. Recommendation: Item was tabled. 2A. Consideration of items removed from the Consent Agenda for discussion. I. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2017-32 authorizing preparation of a Feasibility Report for improvements to Chelsea Road (between TH 25 and Fallon Avenue) (estimated cost of $85, 000). Councilmember Gabler questioned the higher cost for the Chelsea Road feasibility report versus the feasibility report for 7th Street/Cedar Street. Shibani Bisson explained that the feasibility report for Chelsea Road is a more extensive report and the information is provided in the staff report. Councilmember Gabler moved to adopt Resolution 2017-32 authorizing preparation of a Feasibility Report for improvements to Chelsea Road (between TH 25 and Fallon Avenue). Councilmember Fair seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. J. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2017-33 authorizing preparation of a feasibility report for improvements to 7th Street (Cedar Street to west of City Council Minutes —July 10, 2017 Page 4 1 6 Washington Street) and Cedar Street (south of 7th Street) (estimated cost of $35,000). Councilmember Gabler moved to adopt Resolution 2017-33 authorizing preparation of a Feasibility Report for improvements to 7' Street (Cedar Street to west of Washington Street) and Cedar Street (south of 7' Street). Councilmember Davidson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. 3. Public Hearing A. PUBLIC HEARING — Consideration of adopting Resolution 2017-34 anmoving the vacation of a nortion of the drainage and utility easements for Lot 2 and Lot 3, Block 1 of Monticello Commerce Center Fifth Addition. Applicant: Laurentian Properties, LLC. Angela Schumann provided background information and noted that the proposed vacation is requested to allow the current owner to improve the two properties in accordance with a conditional use permit granted in 2016. Mayor Stumpf opened the public hearing. No one testified. Mayor Stumpf closed the public hearing. Councilmember Hilgart moved Alternative 1 - to adopt Resolution 2017-34 approving the vacation of drainage and utility easements for Lot 2 and Lot 3, Block 1 of Monticello Commerce Center Fifth Addition. Councilmember Gabler seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. B. PUBLIC HEARING — Consideration, of adonting Resolution 2017-38 authorizing_ the is,sgance of conduit revenue bonds for the benefit of the SRCS Building_ Company Wayne Oberg presented the item and noted that the SRCS Building Company is issuing the bonds to refinance school facilities, finance certain capital improvement, and to pay the costs of issuance. There is no general or moral obligation of the City. Mayor Stumpf opened the public hearing. No one testified. Mayor Stumpf closed the public hearing. Councilmember Gabler moved Alternative 1— to adopt Resolution 2017-38 authorizing the issuance, sale and delivery of revenue Notes and approving the form of and authorizing the execution and delivery of the Notes and related documents for the SRCS Building Company (Swan River Montessori Charter School). Councilmember Fair seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. City Council Minutes —July 10, 2017 Page 5 1 6 Added Items Mayor Stumpf commented on Riverfest and reminded the City Councilmembers of the Open Meeting Law and to refrain from conducting any city business. Mayor Stumpf announced that Tim Hennagir is leaving the Monticello Times and acknowledged him for his years of work. Mr. Hennagir addressed the City Council. By consensus the meeting was adjourned at 7:22 p.m. Recorder: Jennifer Schreiber Approved: Attest: City Administrator City Council Minutes —July 10, 2017 Page 6 1 6 Residential & Business Subscribers Service Q4 - 2015 Q2 - 2016 Phone Only 32 28 Internet Only 664 717 Television Only 74 73 Phone &Internet 164 I 156 Phone & Television I 44 42 Internet & Television I 316 I 280 Triple Play I 278 I 254 Total Subscribers I 1574 I 1550 Total Phone I 518 I I 480 Total Internet I 1424 1407 Total Television 714 I 649 I 253 July 1st 2016 215 A"ig's 1st Day Q3-2016 Q4-20161 Q2-2017 25 28 IQ1-2017 27 24 765 829 880 915 72 72 69 66 152 145 I 156 I 164 40 I 39 35 I I 34 281 I I 279 255 I 252 254 I I 253 230 I 215 1589 I I 1,645 1,652 I 1,670 471 I I 4651 448 I 437 1452 I 1,506 I 1,521 I I 1,546 647 643 I 589 I I 567 Business Subscribers Service Q4 - 2015 Phone Only 10 Internet Only 37 Television Only 1 Phone & Internet 70 Phone & Television 1 Internet & Television 3 Triple Play 15 Total Subscribers 137 Total Phone 96 Total Internet 125 Total Television 20 Residential Subscribers Service Q4 - 2015 Phone Only 22 Internet Only 627 Television Only 73 Phone & Internet 94 Phone&Television 43 Internet & Television 315 Triple Play 263 Total Subscribers 1437 Total Phone 422 Total Internet 1299 Total Television 694 Q2-2016 Q3-2016 Q4-20161 Q1-20171 Q2-20171 10 10 13 12 10 31 31 35 35 35 2 2 2 1 1 66 66 60 64 67 1 1 I 39 I 35 I 1 4 4 I 4 3 I 3 15 15 I 19 17 I I 16 129 I 129 I 133 132 I I 133 92 I 92 I 92 I 93 I I 94 I 116 I 116 I 118 I 119 I I 121 22 I 22 I 25 I 21 I I 21 Q2-2016 Q3-2016 Q4-2016'' Q1-20171 Q2-2017 18 17 15 15 14 686 734 794 845 880 71 70 70 68 65 90 87 85 92 97 41 I 39 39 I 35 33 276 I 277 I 275 I 252 249 239 I 239 I I 234 I 213 199 1421 I 1463 I I 1,512 I I 1,520 1,537 388 I 382 I I 373 I I 355 343 1291 I 1337 I I 1,388 I I 1,402 1,425 627 I 625 I I 618 I I 568 546 Entity: FiberNet From: Arvig Enterprises, Inc. Subject: Monthly Netting Statement Netting Period: 4/01/2017-4130/2017 Revenues FiberNet Entity: Subscriber Billings 140,664.00 Arvig Enterprises, Inc. Total Revenues: Arvig Enterprises, Inc. 140,664.00 Expenses Subject: Monthly Netting Statement Subscriber Fee (62,645.10) Netting Period: Management Fee (12,875.00) Entity: Fixed Fee (58,350.00) Subscriber Billings 140,543.00 Total Expenses: Total Revenues: (133,870.10) Net Income 136,248.00 $ 6,793.90 Entity: FiberNet Entity: FiberNet From: Arvig Enterprises, Inc. From: Arvig Enterprises, Inc. Subject: Monthly Netting Statement Subject: Monthly Netting Statement Netting Period: 5/01/2017 - 5/31/2017 Netting Period: 6/01/2017 - 6/30/2017 Revenues: Entity: Revenues: Entity: FiberNet Subscriber Billings 140,543.00 Subscriber Billings 136,248.00 Total Revenues: 140,543.00 Total Revenues: 136,248.00 Expenses: Expenses: Subscriber Fee (62,037.74) Subscriber Fee (61,380.13) Management Fee (12,875.00) Management Free (12,875.00) Fixed Fee (58,350.00) Fixed Fee (58,350.00) Total Expenses: (133,262.74) Total Expenses: (132,605.13) Net Income $ 7,280.26 Net Income $ 3,642.87 Entity: FiberNet Entity: FiberNet From: Arvig Enterprises, Inc. From: Arvig Enterprises, Inc. Subject: Netting Statement Subject: Netting Statement Netting Period: 2nd Quarter 2017 Total Netting Period: YTD 2017 Total Revenues: Subscriber Billings 417,455.00 Total Revenues: 417,455.00 Expenses: Subscriber Fee (186,062.97) Management Fee 38,625.00 Fixed Fee 175,050.00 Total Expenses: (399,737.97) Net Income $ 17,717.03 Subscriber Billing 852,954.00 (Revenues: 852,954.00 Subscriber Fee (381,931.37) Management Fe J77,250.00 Fixed Fee (350,100.00 Expenses: (809,281 Income $ 43,672.63 Capital Expense Report; Budget versus Spend Q2 2017 Mapcom - Plant Records - 95,000 95,000 Total 56,754 259,900 (56,754) Note from 2016 CapEx Budget: Budget Spent Head End - Analog 29,500 8,984 20,516 Noted in Q1: * $20,516 Budgeted in 2016 We were able to update and condense this equipment for an additional outlay of only $806.39 in 2017. Leaving an unspent budgeted (favorable variance) amount of $19,710 (20,516 - 806) YTD - Q2 Budget Variance HE/CO Equipment 3,965 27,650 23,685 Drops - 44,750 44,750 CPE Equipment 52,790 55,000 2,210 Mediaroom (MMR) Transition - 37,500 37,500 $ 56,754 $ 164,900 $ 108,146 Mapcom - Plant Records - 95,000 95,000 Total 56,754 259,900 (56,754) Note from 2016 CapEx Budget: Budget Spent Head End - Analog 29,500 8,984 20,516 Noted in Q1: * $20,516 Budgeted in 2016 We were able to update and condense this equipment for an additional outlay of only $806.39 in 2017. Leaving an unspent budgeted (favorable variance) amount of $19,710 (20,516 - 806) Financial Projections PRELIMINARY January - June 2017 FIBERnet oeu.e.m ny arvig Prelim Budget Jan -June 2017 Jan -June 2017 Variance Projected Revenue: $852,954 $873,993 ($21,039) Expenses Subscriber COGS 381,931 $406,576 ($24,644) Fixed Cost 350,100 $332,609 $17,492 Cash flow from Operations $120,923 $134,809 ($13,886) Management Fee: Fixed 77,250 $77,250 $0 Adjusted EBITDA $43,673 $57,559 ($13,886) Management Fee: Incentive - 50% Capital Expense: (56,754) ($129,950) $73,196 City Cash Flow (13,081) (154,684) $141,603 Marketing Update Q2 FiberNet • FiberNet participated in the Movie in the Park and the Monticello Rock'n' Roll. We'll also have representation in the Riverfest parade. • FiberNet had success with the Gig Price For Life promo to residential. • FiberNet has been inserting, monthly, into the City of Monticello invoices. • FiberNet has been inserting, monthly, into the Chamber newsletter. • Created, updated and notified FiberNet customers re: the change to the MetaSwitch for phone service and the voicemail changes. • Created and updated FiberNet television materials to launch MMR Entertainment Plans. • Created FiberNet inControl (customers can set their TV recordings via the website) • Updated/printing FiberNet Hold Harmless Forms • FiberNet Facebook: o Total Number of Likes: 293 o Most engaged post: Get Gig price for life. 230 reached, post clicks: 20, comments/shares/reactions: 5 • Facebook Advertising — Gig price for life —110 ad recall lift, 1502 reach • Google Adwords (month of June) o Business Display & Search are running o Residential —Gig Price for life Display & Search with over 36,700 impressions and 91 clicks • Online form fills: o May: 13 o June:20 Monticello City Law Enforcement Quarterly Review 2nd QUARTER 2017 April 1 St -June 30th 2017 City of Monticello Activity for 2nd Quarter (April 1 St -June 30th 2017) Same time period comparison ! 2016 Activity (Time Period April 1sT -June 30th 2016) 3145 Calls For Service assigned in Monticello w 1673 cases assigned to patrol Property Crimes: - 6 Burglaries 10 Damage to Property • 62 Gen al Thefts w 9 T ft from vehicle - 3 Gas Drive -Off 15 Shoplifting 38 rug Complaints Juvenile Complaints 84 Motor Vehicle crashes (10 of those involved injuries) 5 Assault Complaint 62 Domestic Disturbance Complaints 660 Traffic Stops 246 Citations issued 3 individuals booked into jail 2017 Activity (Time Period April 1st -June 30th 2017) 3022 Calls for Service assigned in Monticello M 1679 cases assigned to patrol m Property Crimes: M 4 Burglaries m 30 Damage to Property • 42 General Thefts M 7 Theft from vehicle m 37 Gas Drive -Off m 16 Shoplifting M 28 Drug Complaints m 54 Juvenile Complaints m 78 Motor Vehicle crashes (7 involved injuries) M 11 Assault Complaint m 50 Domestic Disturbance Complaints 817 Traffic Stops m 317 total citations issued m 42 individuals arrested/booked in jail City of Monticello Law Enforcement Activity By Division w Patrol Division w 3022 Calls for Service which resulted inl 679 Patrol Cases � Criminal Investigations Division(CID) 38 cases assigned; /Fraud, Theft and CSC (Criminal Sexual Conduct) cases were the most frequent crime investigated Several victims of Identity Theft and scams (internet and phone) throughout Monticello and the surrounding area w Notable Investigations: Several counterfeit bills have continued to be passed at different businesses around the city. w Major Crimes Investigation Unit (MCIU) w 5 cases assigned CDP (Criminal Damage to Property), Death investigation, and assault were cases that were processed by MCIU this quarter. r of Monticello Law Enforcement Activity by Division (Cont.) w School Resource Officers w 39 Cases Assigned Theft, Social Media and Harassment continued to be the most common cases reported in the schools this quarter. Mental Health issues continued to be common problem in all the schools throughout the school year. w Special Investigations Unit 12 Cases Investigated w Majority are Drug Crimes r of Monticello Law Enforcement Activity by Division (Cont.) w Special Investigations Unit: (continued) 2 Controlled Buys 3 Narcotic Search Warrants Served .57 grams of Methamphetamine seized .26 grams of cocaine seized 8 Tabs of LSD seized 3 Felony Arrests for Controlled Substance Violations 4 Vehicles Seized QUESTIONS? City Council Agenda 07/24/2017 2A. Consideration of avvrovin2 vavment of bills (WO) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: City staff submits the attached bill registers and purchasing card registers for approval by Council. The bill registers contain all invoices processed and the purchasing card registers contain all card purchases made since the last Council meeting. Subject to MN Statutes, most invoices require Council approval prior to releasing checks for payment. The day following Council approval, payments will be released unless directed otherwise. A credit purchasing agreement and policy was approved by Council initially and card purchases must comply with the policy. If Council has no questions or comments on the bill and purchase card registers, these can be approved with the consent agenda. If requested, this item can be removed from consent and discussed prior to making a motion for approval. Al. Budget Impact: None A2. Staff Workload Impact: No additional work required B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the bill and purchase card registers for a total amount of $820,297.24. 2. Motion to approve the registers with changes directed by Council. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends Alternative #1 or #2, per direction of Council. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • Bill registers and Purchase Card registers Accounts Payable Computer Check Proof List by Vendor User: Julie.Cheney Printed: 07/14/2017 - 1:34PM Batch: 00201.07.2017 - 201.07.2017 US Bank Invoice No Description Vendor: 2968 BOND TRUST SERV CORP - Wire Transfer 35948 33,275.00 Series 2010A GO Improvement & Refunding Be 35949 312-47000-461100 Series 2011A GO Refunding Bonds - Interest Check Total: Vendor: 2439 DEPT OF EMPLOYMENT & ECON DEVELO 7/10/2017 2,252.45 Qtr 2 2017 Unemployment Benefits 7/10/2017 101-45201-414200 Qtr 2 2017 Unemployment Benefits 07/15/2017 Check Total: Vendor: 3241 LINCOLN FINANCIAL GROUP 7/1/2017 July 2017 Check Sequence: 3 Check Total: Vendor: 1593 MN DEPT OF REVENUE - ACH June June Sales Tax - Hi Way Liquor June June Sales Tax - Hi Way Liquor June Check Sequence: 4 June Use Tax - General June 07/15/2017 June Use Tax - General June June Waste Tax - General June 72.30 June Waste Tax - General June 101-00000-208100 June Use Tax - MCC June 07/15/2017 June Use Tax - MCC June June Use Tax - Water Fund June -0.35 June Use Tax - Water Fund Check Total: Vendor: 1426 CITY OF MONTICELLO UB May 2017 5002-000 1510 Hart Blvd sprinkler UB May 2017 5003-000 1460 Hart Blvd sprinkler Amount Payment Date Acct Number Check Sequence: 1 13,571.25 07/15/2017 317-47000-461100 33,275.00 07/15/2017 312-47000-461100 46,846.25 Check Sequence: 2 2,252.45 07/15/2017 101-45201-414200 270.19 07/15/2017 101-43120-414200 2,522.64 Check Sequence: 3 1,693.05 07/15/2017 101-00000-217066 1,693.05 Check Sequence: 4 2,904.84 07/15/2017 609-00000-208100 -0.84 07/15/2017 609-00000-362900 72.30 07/15/2017 101-00000-208100 -0.30 07/15/2017 101-00000-362900 717.35 07/15/2017 101-00000-208120 -0.35 07/15/2017 101-00000-362900 5,775.34 07/15/2017 226-00000-208100 -0.34 07/15/2017 226-45122-362900 1,546.84 07/15/2017 601-00000-208100 0.16 07/15/2017 601-49440-443990 11,015.00 Check Sequence: 5 6.27 07/15/2017 101-43120-438200 6.27 07/15/2017 101-43120-438200 Moiiii6effo Y Reference ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: True AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/14/2017 - 1:34 PM) Page 1 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number UB May 2017 5004-000 1390 Hart Blvd sprinkler 5.45 07/15/2017 101-43120-438200 UB May 2017 5026 -000 Ellison Park 148.65 07/15/2017 101-45201-438200 UB May 2017 5248 -000 Bridge Park 112.83 07/15/2017 101-45201-438200 UB May 2017 5249-000 Bridge Park W. sprinkler 14.96 07/15/2017 101-45201-438200 UB May 2017 5250-000 Bridge Park W. 107 River St 38.94 07/15/2017 101-45201-438200 UB May 2017 5637-000 Meadow Oak Dog Park 5.45 07/15/2017 101-45201-438200 UB May 2017 7224 -000 WWTP 1,716.96 07/15/2017 602-49480-438200 UB May 2017 7441-000 200 W Broadway sprinkler 7.51 07/15/2017 101-43120-438200 UB May 2017 7885-000 Help Center 22.67 07/15/2017 217-41990-438200 UB May 2017 8086-000 4th St Warming House 13.66 07/15/2017 101-45201-438200 UB May 2017 8114-000 4Hi-Way Liquor 56.31 07/15/2017 609-49754-438200 UB May 2017 8117-000 MCC 962.56 07/15/2017 226-45126-438200 UB May 2017 8119-000 Fire Station 33.52 07/15/2017 101-42200-438200 UB May 2017 8120-000 Bldg. Inspection Garage 110.54 07/15/2017 101-41940-438200 UB May 2017 8177-000 Library 65.75 07/15/2017 101-45501-438200 UB May 2017 8394-000 Riverside Cemetery sprinkler 15.21 07/15/2017 651-49010-438200 UB May 2017 8488-000 Hillcrest Park sprinkler 54.33 07/15/2017 101-45201-438200 UB May 2017 8533 -000 Chelsea Rd W sprinkler 6.27 07/15/2017 602-49490-438200 UB May 2017 8622-000 Pioneer Park bathroom 92.48 07/15/2017 101-45201-438200 UB May 2017 8631-000 Chelsea Rd. Animal Shelter 48.88 07/15/2017 101-42700-438200 UB May 2017 8674-000 Reservoir- 207 Chelsea Rd sprinkler 10.00 07/15/2017 601-49440-438200 UB May 2017 8903 -000 PW Shop/Clerical 190.70 07/15/2017 101-43127-438200 UB May 2017 8904-000 PW Vehicle Storage 14.96 07/15/2017 101-43127-438200 UB May 2017 8905 -000 PW Office 13.66 07/15/2017 101-43127-438200 UB May 2017 10063-000 Front St.Park sprinkler 11.24 07/15/2017 101-45201-438200 UB May 2017 10128-000 118 6th St W office 13.66 07/15/2017 101-41941-438200 UB May 2017 13953-000 SPR Hwy 25/SE Broadway -100 E. B 9.23 07/15/2017 101-43120-438200 UB May 2017 10267-000 Community Garden sprinkler 6.27 07/15/2017 226-45127-438200 Check Total: 3,815.19 Vendor: 2811 US BANK CORPORATE PMT SYSTEM Check Sequence: 6 07/06/2017 Facebook - Ad for Farmer's Market 4.95 07/15/2017 226-00000-220100 07/06/2017 Facebook- Wine Sale Promo. 25.04 07/15/2017 609-49754-434990 07/06/2017 Home Depot - ZPARKS-ELLPRK- tough tape; ( 27.68 07/15/2017 229-45202-453010 07/06/2017 Runnings- (6) 32oz. multi -mix for sm. engines S 29.70 07/15/2017 101-42200-421200 07/06/2017 Grady's -ext. pole; floor squeegee; handle 30.57 07/15/2017 101-45201-421650 07/06/2017 Mt. Olympus - Fraud charge -Credit next stmnt.- 34.16 07/15/2017 101-00000-115030 07/06/2017 Grady's- 8"pruner; pruner bypass forged; 6" prur 61.56 07/15/2017 101-43120-421990 07/06/2017 Monti Napa- #232 & shop- air filter; drain pan 61.85 07/15/2017 101-43127-421990 07/06/2017 Home Depot - Industrl Hose; (2) scrub brush; (2; 98.11 07/15/2017 101-45201-421650 07/06/2017 ZEP- (20) 20oz. sunscreen 100.62 07/15/2017 101-45201-420650 07/06/2017 Wisc. Ducks - Fraud charge -Credit next stmnt.- 120.00 07/15/2017 101-00000-115030 Reference ACH Enabled: True AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/14/2017 - 1:34 PM) Page 2 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 07/06/2017 Applied Mntc.- 12pk black aerosol paint - Shop 128.20 07/15/2017 101-43127-421510 07/06/2017 Home Depot - ZPARKS-ELLPRK- (20) 10'R& 143.32 07/15/2017 229-45202-453010 07/06/2017 Dyna -(6) Flap -Wheel High Density A/O;(50)cal 199.08 07/15/2017 101-45201-421650 07/06/2017 Home Depot - ZPARKS-ELLPRK- (15) 10'R& 278.10 07/15/2017 229-45202-453010 07/06/2017 ZEP- (4) cs garb. bag;DZ Aero Erase; CS Hnd Si 423.90 07/15/2017 101-45201-421650 07/06/2017 Boyer- #111 - credit -358.30 07/15/2017 101-43120-422110 07/06/2017 Monti RV - propane 20lbs 18.80 07/15/2017 101-43120-421990 07/06/2017 Big Lake Lumber- ZPARKS-ELLPRK-(3) Inv. - 2,000.00 07/15/2017 229-45202-453010 07/06/2017 Winterland - credit from order 3/31/17 -17.78 07/15/2017 101-45201-421650 07/06/2017 Home Depot - (10) 6'U -Post 44.80 07/15/2017 101-43120-421990 07/06/2017 Dyna - doz. Termi-Kleen PS Elec; (100) cable tit 341.38 07/15/2017 101-43127-421990 07/06/2017 Home Depot - return OSB - original purch. 6/8/1 -11.55 07/15/2017 101-45201-421990 07/06/2017 Home Depot -(3) 20pk locking cable ties 7.08 07/15/2017 101-45201-421650 07/06/2017 Olson & Sons - cord connect 7.50 07/15/2017 101-45201-421650 07/06/2017 DSG - 20 ft Core pipe 9.20 07/15/2017 101-45201-421650 07/06/2017 Grady's - 4 oz lube; plug cored 10.08 07/15/2017 101-45201-421650 07/06/2017 Home Depot - Gal.. Bushing; (2) PVC elb; adapt 12.51 07/15/2017 101-45201-421990 07/06/2017 Grady's -9v batteries 12.99 07/15/2017 101-45201-421650 07/06/2017 Home Depot -(250) pk wirenut wire conn. 13.97 07/15/2017 101-43160-421530 07/06/2017 Grady's -wire stripper 14.95 07/15/2017 609-49754-421990 07/06/2017 Hoglund Bus - #109- (11) Pin Slack 29.56 07/15/2017 101-43120-422110 07/06/2017 Monti Napa- (10) grease for loader 31.40 07/15/2017 101-45201-421990 07/06/2017 Grady's 4105 (2) brooms; Hex Bushing; Strt Ell 33.46 07/15/2017 101-43120-422110 07/06/2017 Martie's- (4) peony cage - Adopt -a -Park 35.96 07/15/2017 101-45201-440900 07/06/2017 Kwik Trip - (18.097) gal. unleaded @$2.459 44.50 07/15/2017 101-45201-421200 07/06/2017 Kwik Trip 4215 (19.722) gal. unleaded @$2.4'_ 48.50 07/15/2017 101-45201-421200 07/06/2017 FirstSource - drug screen T. Moshier- Parks 50.95 07/15/2017 101-45201-431990 07/06/2017 NBP- (2) cleaner 51.29 07/15/2017 609-49754-421990 07/06/2017 Martie's-25# Sunny Grass 58.00 07/15/2017 101-43120-422500 07/06/2017 Home Depot - ZPARKS-ELLPRK-sleeve anchor 70.46 07/15/2017 229-45202-453010 07/06/2017 DSG -(3) galv. brs. seat;(3) teflon tape; etc 80.79 07/15/2017 101-45201-421650 07/06/2017 Cub Foods- resale box limes; (12) lemons 97.88 07/15/2017 609-49750-425500 07/06/2017 G & K - mats- mv. #6043764178; 6043789897 113.13 07/15/2017 609-49754-431990 07/06/2017 Home Depot - ZPARKS-ELLPRK- palm nailer; 121.88 07/15/2017 229-45202-453010 07/06/2017 NBP- (2) bx gloves; ct disinfect. wipes; gal. clea 122.28 07/15/2017 609-49754-421990 07/06/2017 Paypal-CSP Outdoors- ZPARKS-MOVTIV-(3) - 170.05 07/15/2017 101-45201-421990 07/06/2017 Runnings- STORM -170611 224.30 07/15/2017 101-46102-421990 07/06/2017 Boyer Truck- #109- (4) Slack Adj - PW 263.96 07/15/2017 101-43120-422110 07/06/2017 Moon Motors- Engine 1 fixed generator-carburc 279.23 07/15/2017 101-42200-440440 07/06/2017 Traffic Control Corp- (12) asst. LED lights 380.25 07/15/2017 101-43160-421530 07/06/2017 Monti Napa -(2) 35 T Service Jack 399.98 07/15/2017 101-43127-421990 07/06/2017 Beacon Athletics -(4) pitching rubber 451.44 07/15/2017 101-45203-421990 07/06/2017 Runnings- ZPARKS-MONTIVI-chain saw; blow 453.89 07/15/2017 101-45201-421990 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/14/2017 - 1:34 PM) Page 3 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 07/06/2017 ESS Bros.- (6) Truncated Domes 2x2 486.00 07/15/2017 101-43120-422400 07/06/2017 MN PCA- Hazz. Waste Fees-inv. #33643 570.91 07/15/2017 101-43127-443700 07/06/2017 Arctic Glacier -resale - inv. 1956714909;19567 1 997.27 07/15/2017 609-49750-425500 07/06/2017 Target - Food for EDA Meeting 29.99 07/15/2017 213-46301-443990 07/06/2017 Target - Ear Buds 13.49 07/15/2017 101-41910-421990 07/06/2017 Holiday - Unleaded Fuel 10.275 gals @ $2.359 24.24 07/15/2017 217-41990-421200 07/06/2017 Holiday - Unleaded Fuel 9.253 gals @ $2.299 21.27 07/15/2017 217-41990-421200 07/06/2017 Holiday - Unleaded Fuel 8.144 gals @ $2.279 18.56 07/15/2017 217-41990-421200 07/06/2017 Holiday - Unleaded Fuel 15.050 gals @ $2.299 34.60 07/15/2017 226-45126-421200 07/06/2017 Grady's - Keys (2) & Lock Ease 7.47 07/15/2017 226-45126-422990 07/06/2017 Grady's - Cement Primer, Pipe, Bolts, for FI 37.92 07/15/2017 226-45126-422990 07/06/2017 Grady's - Sand (2) for Farmers Market 13.18 07/15/2017 226-45126-422990 07/06/2017 Grady's - Wire Connectors; Grease 11.27 07/15/2017 226-45126-422990 07/06/2017 Grady's - Hose & Clamp for Faucet; Extension C 21.75 07/15/2017 226-45126-440440 07/06/2017 Grady's - Wall Anchors (5), Toggles (5) 13.05 07/15/2017 226-45126-422990 07/06/2017 Grady's - Belts (2); Screws (4) 18.58 07/15/2017 226-45126-440440 07/06/2017 Grady's - Painters Tape (6 pk) 17.99 07/15/2017 226-45126-421990 07/06/2017 Grady's - Nts (4); Screws (4) to fix C8 3.00 07/15/2017 226-45126-440440 07/06/2017 Grady's - PVC Cap 1.79 07/15/2017 226-45126-422990 07/06/2017 Grady's - Kilz Primer/Sealer (1 gal) 18.74 07/15/2017 226-45126-440100 07/06/2017 Grady's - Drywall Knife & Broad Knife 23.98 07/15/2017 226-45126-422990 07/06/2017 Walmart - Returned Extra Juice -7.62 07/15/2017 101-41800-443990 07/06/2017 Walmart - Batteries 23.56 07/15/2017 101-41110-443990 07/06/2017 Walmart - Candy for Walk & Roll 21.90 07/15/2017 101-45130-444140 07/06/2017 Walmart - Sunscreen; Craft Supplies for FI 57.80 07/15/2017 226-45127-421981 07/06/2017 Walmart - Candy for Walk & Roll 18.52 07/15/2017 217-41990-434990 07/06/2017 Home Depot - PVC Cap for Farmers Market 28.28 07/15/2017 226-45126-422990 07/06/2017 Home Depot - Command Hooks, Washer, Cable 24.83 07/15/2017 226-45126-421990 07/06/2017 Home Depot - 1x6xl2 Boards for FI (2) 31.96 07/15/2017 226-45126-440100 07/06/2017 Home Depot - Recycling Bins (13), 18' LED Rol 101.35 07/15/2017 226-45126-421990 07/06/2017 Sherwin Williams - Ceiling Paint 37.03 07/15/2017 226-45126-440100 07/06/2017 Office Max - Foam Board (3) 26.94 07/15/2017 101-41910-443990 07/06/2017 Office Max - Poster Boards 14.29 07/15/2017 101-45130-444140 07/06/2017 Office Max - Staple Remover, Markers, Hanging 26.87 07/15/2017 226-45122-421990 07/06/2017 Amazon - 19" LED Monitor 549.99 07/15/2017 226-45122-424100 07/06/2017 Amazon - Corkboards (2 - 4pks) 20.09 07/15/2017 226-45122-421990 07/06/2017 Monti Chamber - Advertising on Kiosk 30.00 07/15/2017 226-45124-434990 07/06/2017 G & K - Uniforms, Towels, Mops (2 invoices) 96.04 07/15/2017 226-45126-431990 07/06/2017 Dacotah Paper - Concession Supplies 70.82 07/15/2017 226-45125-421990 07/06/2017 Dacotah Paper - Bathroom & Locker Room Supl 237.24 07/15/2017 226-45126-421990 07/06/2017 Dacotah Paper - Bathroom & Locker Room Supl 602.06 07/15/2017 226-45126-421990 07/06/2017 Dacotah Paper - Bathroom Supplies 33.86 07/15/2017 101-45501-421990 07/06/2017 Verizon - April 21 - May 20 26.02 07/15/2017 101-43120-432100 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/14/2017 - 1:34 PM) Page 4 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 07/06/2017 Verizon - April 11 - May 10 25.02 07/15/2017 101-43115-432100 07/06/2017 Randy's - Shredding Services (CH) 17.55 07/15/2017 101-41310-431990 07/06/2017 Randy's - Shredding Services (DMV) 17.55 07/15/2017 217-41990-431990 07/06/2017 NBP - File Folders, Legal Pads, Paper, Spoons 74.42 07/15/2017 101-41310-421990 07/06/2017 NBP - Paper, Post Its, Flags, Eraser 69.81 07/15/2017 101-41310-421990 07/06/2017 NBP - Labels, Paper 76.06 07/15/2017 101-41310-421990 07/06/2017 NBP - Paper, Scissors, Stapler, Staples, Tape, 107.46 07/15/2017 226-45122-421990 07/06/2017 Monti Chamber - June Lunch (RL) 15.00 07/15/2017 101-41310-443990 07/06/2017 Super America - Windshield Washer Fluid 3.41 07/15/2017 217-41990-443990 07/06/2017 123 Sign Up Payroll Seminar 6/15 (RLC) 25.00 07/15/2017 101-41520-433100 07/06/2017 3M - Online Respirator Evaluation 29.00 07/15/2017 101-41800-431990 07/06/2017 JP Cooke - Custom Stamper LN 45.95 07/15/2017 217-41990-421990 07/06/2017 J C Penney - Field Trip T -Shirts for FI (32) 278.68 07/15/2017 226-45127-421981 07/06/2017 Recreation Supply - Pool Wall Clock 46.62 07/15/2017 226-45124-421990 07/06/2017 Stellis Health - Vaccinations (2) KP 158.00 07/15/2017 101-42200-431990 07/06/2017 Domino's Pizza - Meal for Workshop Meeting (6 72.82 07/15/2017 101-41110-443990 07/06/2017 Banners.com - Park Banners for Walk & Roll (2) 116.47 07/15/2017 101-45201-421650 07/06/2017 Allied Parking - ZZZNEP- Annual P10 Training 7.50 07/15/2017 101-42500-433100 07/06/2017 Master CPE - CPA 12 Month Unlimited Subscril 149.00 07/15/2017 101-41520-433100 07/06/2017 APStylebook.com - 2017 AP Style Book (RL) 36.69 07/15/2017 101-41310-443990 07/06/2017 Sam's Club - Ballfield Concession Supplies: Can 54.63 07/15/2017 226-45125-425410 07/06/2017 Sam's Club - Cupcakes 12.98 07/15/2017 226-45127-421460 07/06/2017 Sam's Club - Cleaning Wipes 8.98 07/15/2017 226-45122-421990 07/06/2017 Sam's Club - Annual Membership 100.00 07/15/2017 226-45122-443300 07/06/2017 Verizon - April 21 - May 20 140.04 07/15/2017 101-42200-432100 07/06/2017 Verizon - May 11 - June 10 25.02 07/15/2017 101-42400-432100 07/06/2017 Verizon - May 4 - June 3 50.71 07/15/2017 101-42400-432100 07/06/2017 Verizon - May 4 - June 3 31.27 07/15/2017 226-45122-432100 07/06/2017 Verizon - May 4 - June 3 104.82 07/15/2017 101-43120-432100 07/06/2017 Verizon - May 4 - June 3 45.99 07/15/2017 601-49440-432100 07/06/2017 Verizon - May 4 - June 3 45.99 07/15/2017 602-49490-432100 07/06/2017 Dacotah Paper - Concession Supplies 70.82 07/15/2017 226-45125-421990 07/06/2017 Dacotah Paper - Bathroom & Locker Room Supl 780.69 07/15/2017 226-45126-421990 07/06/2017 Advanced Disposal - May 2017 37,888.82 07/15/2017 101-43230-438400 07/06/2017 Advanced Disposal - Recycling - May 2017 12,597.00 07/15/2017 101-43230-438400 07/06/2017 Advanced Disposal - May 2017 35.80 07/15/2017 101-43127-438400 07/06/2017 Advanced Disposal - May 2017 47.74 07/15/2017 101-45201-438400 07/06/2017 Advanced Disposal - May 2017 23.87 07/15/2017 101-45201-438400 07/06/2017 Advanced Disposal - May 2017 113.38 07/15/2017 602-49480-438400 07/06/2017 Advanced Disposal - May 2017 208.87 07/15/2017 226-45126-438400 07/06/2017 Advanced Disposal - May 2017 11.93 07/15/2017 101-45501-431990 07/06/2017 Advanced Disposal - May 2017 23.87 07/15/2017 609-49754-438400 07/06/2017 Advanced Disposal - May 2017 23.87 07/15/2017 101-45201-438400 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/14/2017 - 1:34 PM) Page 5 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 07/06/2017 Walmart - Food for Volunteer Picnic 119.65 07/15/2017 101-41800-443990 07/06/2017 Von Hansons - Burgers, Hot Dogs & Buns for Vc 219.96 07/15/2017 101-41800-443990 07/06/2017 Amazon - Desk Chair & Arms (SR) 358.31 07/15/2017 101-41520-421990 07/06/2017 Grady's - Measuring Spoons for Pool Chemicals 1.79 07/15/2017 226-45124-421990 07/06/2017 General Rental - CO2 for Coils 62.70 07/15/2017 226-45126-421990 07/06/2017 Como Town - Ride Wrist Bands for FI 110.00 07/15/2017 226-45127-431990 07/06/2017 Home Depot - Round Up Weed Spray; Multi Apl 25.95 07/15/2017 226-45126-421990 07/06/2017 Home Depot - Ceiling Paint, Foam Roll Covers 53.61 07/15/2017 226-45126-422990 07/06/2017 G & K - Uniforms, Towels, Mops (2 invoices) 97.98 07/15/2017 226-45126-431990 07/06/2017 Office Max - Computer Mouse (GH) 19.99 07/15/2017 226-45122-421990 07/06/2017 Amazon - File Folders (10 boxes) 165.90 07/15/2017 226-45122-421990 07/06/2017 Cragun's Lodging for State Conference (MRPA) 234.09 07/15/2017 226-45122-433100 07/06/2017 Wall Street Journal - Monthly Subscription (WO 36.99 07/15/2017 101-41520-443300 07/06/2017 Fastenal - (6) 5/16-18X1 5S/S FHSCS- Fire Dep 2.23 07/15/2017 101-42200-421990 07/06/2017 Fastenal -(100) for meters 3.89 07/15/2017 601-49440-422701 07/06/2017 Grady's 14 oz propane cyl. 3.99 07/15/2017 601-49440-421990 07/06/2017 Grady's - nipple 4.99 07/15/2017 601-49440-422100 07/06/2017 Grady's - ZPARKS-ELLPRK- coupler 6.99 07/15/2017 229-45202-453010 07/06/2017 USPS- postage -chains for cutters edge 7.15 07/15/2017 101-42200-432200 07/06/2017 Grady's -AA battery 9.99 07/15/2017 101-43127-421990 07/06/2017 Runnings- shed- screws 9.99 07/15/2017 101-43127-421990 07/06/2017 Home Depot - 2x8 Galv. Nipple 10.02 07/15/2017 601-49440-421990 07/06/2017 Auto Value - #105- Elec. Flasher 10.99 07/15/2017 101-43120-422110 07/06/2017 Monti Napa- #109- mirror 11.29 07/15/2017 101-43120-422110 07/06/2017 Home Depot - bar & chain oil 11.99 07/15/2017 101-43127-421990 07/06/2017 Grady's - hook knife; 5pk blades 13.58 07/15/2017 101-45201-421650 07/06/2017 Auto Value - 7 RV Blade to 6 Pole 16.99 07/15/2017 101-45201-421650 07/06/2017 Monti Napa- #108- air filter 21.54 07/15/2017 101-43120-422110 07/06/2017 Runnings- (10) 24pk water; (2) bowl cleaner; so: 29.57 07/15/2017 101-42200-421990 07/06/2017 Monti RV -(10) gal propene 35.00 07/15/2017 101-45201-421650 07/06/2017 Runnings- (2) chain; 3pk files- trim saw 41.39 07/15/2017 101-43120-422100 07/06/2017 Home Depot - Poly Scoop; bar/chain oil; leaf rat 42.92 07/15/2017 101-43120-421990 07/06/2017 Cub Foods- resale (40) limes; (12) lemons 43.48 07/15/2017 609-49750-425500 07/06/2017 Auto Value - (10) Moly-Graph Ext. Pres. 54.90 07/15/2017 101-45201-421650 07/06/2017 Monti Napa- flasher; (4.7) hyd. HD; (2) hyd hos( 58.07 07/15/2017 101-43120-422110 07/06/2017 Active 911- (5) annual fire responders app 61.15 07/15/2017 101-42200-421990 07/06/2017 DISH- July 2017 service 64.16 07/15/2017 609-49754-432500 07/06/2017 Monti Napa- #117- (4) hyd. hose fit; (8) Hyd. HI 73.56 07/15/2017 101-43120-422100 07/06/2017 Home Depot - ZPARKS-ELLPRK- (4) 165' Tyv( 76.37 07/15/2017 229-45202-453010 07/06/2017 General Rental -ZPARKS-ELLPRK- screened cc 98.43 07/15/2017 229-45202-453010 07/06/2017 Northern Tool -hitch- Dual Purp. Pintle w/2 99.99 07/15/2017 101-43127-422100 07/06/2017 Titan Mach.- FF coupler- Blacktop Mill 110.36 07/15/2017 101-43120-422100 07/06/2017 Fastenal -(8) 3pc. Rainsuit 119.92 07/15/2017 101-43120-420650 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/14/2017 - 1:34 PM) Page 6 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 07/06/2017 Runnings- (2) 201b propane; BBQ tool set; (2) a< 125.85 07/15/2017 101-45201-421650 07/06/2017 Emergency Auto. Tech- #103- LED Beacon 135.54 07/15/2017 101-43120-422100 07/06/2017 Dyna - (2) Flexmaster UV; (100) 501b cable tic; 152.23 07/15/2017 101-43127-421990 07/06/2017 Central Hyd- swivel 90 elbow; female swivel; o- 162.77 07/15/2017 101-43120-422100 07/06/2017 Home Depot - ZPARKS-ELLPRK- (2) pool trom 168.35 07/15/2017 229-45202-453010 07/06/2017 Boyer- #111- 24SI HP AL; V -Belt 213.35 07/15/2017 101-43120-422110 07/06/2017 Runnings-BloweerAttach. Helmet; 14" chain 221.89 07/15/2017 101-46102-421990 07/06/2017 Home Depot -(14) 12' Douglas Fir; Jig Saw blad 244.03 07/15/2017 101-45201-421650 07/06/2017 General Rental -ZPARKS-ELLPRK- scaffold; bi 458.64 07/15/2017 229-45202-453010 07/06/2017 Discount Steel - (5) galv. per£ tube- sign posts 727.82 07/15/2017 101-43120-422600 07/06/2017 WHCE- Sunset Ponds May usage (298) kWh 55.21 07/15/2017 602-49490-438100 07/06/2017 WHCE- 1645 & 1675 CR 39 54.50 07/15/2017 602-49490-438100 07/06/2017 WHCE- DMV 19.95 07/15/2017 217-41990-431900 07/06/2017 WHCE- 2171 W River ST- Parks 36.45 07/15/2017 101-45201-431900 07/06/2017 WHCE- 5980 Jason Ave- Water 19.95 07/15/2017 601-49440-431900 07/06/2017 WHCE- MCC 27.95 07/15/2017 226-45126-431900 07/06/2017 WHCE- 207 Chelsea Rd 227.95 07/15/2017 601-49440-431900 07/06/2017 WHCE- 209 Cedar 29.95 07/15/2017 601-49440-431900 07/06/2017 WHCE- 132 E Broadway 29.95 07/15/2017 601-49440-431900 07/06/2017 WHCE- 107 River St. W 19.95 07/15/2017 101-45201-431900 07/06/2017 WHCE- Hi -Way Liquor - July service 21.32 07/15/2017 609-49754-431900 07/06/2017 WHCE- MCC - July service 19.95 07/15/2017 226-45126-431900 07/06/2017 WHCE-200 Dundas - July service 29.95 07/15/2017 601-49440-431900 07/06/2017 WHCE-909 Golf Course Rd - July service 19.95 07/15/2017 101-43110-431900 07/06/2017 WHCE- General Street Lighting 1,334.00 07/15/2017 101-43160-438100 07/06/2017 Boyer- #111 - ECU Max: Lever -RF; return old o 4,966.78 07/15/2017 101-43120-422110 07/06/2017 Grady's - (2) 601b concrete mix 13.18 07/15/2017 101-43120-422600 07/06/2017 Kwik Trip - (6.156) gal.oxigenated @ $2.699- fc 16.62 07/15/2017 101-42200-421200 07/06/2017 Kwik Trip - (10.417) gal bio diesel. @ $2.399- fi 24.99 07/15/2017 101-43120-421200 07/06/2017 Runnings- Stihl- parts only 42.16 07/15/2017 101-42200-422100 07/06/2017 Runnings- 50' hose; chain sharpen; fitting pipe; e 85.18 07/15/2017 101-43127-422100 07/06/2017 Runnings- water pump- mist. coupler; adapt.; fit 93.39 07/15/2017 101-43120-422100 07/06/2017 Clarke Mosquito Cntrl- (2) cs 4 gal. Clarke Flit 378.00 07/15/2017 101-45201-421600 07/06/2017 Northern Tool- water pump 399.00 07/15/2017 101-43120-422100 07/06/2017 Site One - Irrigation Pump 1,258.29 07/15/2017 101-45201-421650 07/06/2017 Site One -relief valve repr kit; rbr prts; inlet sprit 368.00 07/15/2017 101-45201-421650 07/06/2017 Site One -Freeway backflow -(3) sprinkler; (4) A 336.53 07/15/2017 101-45201-421650 07/06/2017 WHCE- Street Light contract 4/16-5/15/2017 1,964.05 07/15/2017 101-43160-431900 07/06/2017 Home Depot - Grout for Tile at Senior Center 42.69 07/15/2017 101-45175-440100 07/06/2017 NBP - Dictation Recorder, Tape, Pens 161.06 07/15/2017 101-41310-421990 07/06/2017 NBP - Paper, Fingertip Moistener 115.57 07/15/2017 217-41990-421990 07/06/2017 NBP - Staples 5.94 07/15/2017 217-41990-421990 07/06/2017 NBP - Paper, Pen Refills 11.71 07/15/2017 226-45122-421990 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/14/2017 - 1:34 PM) Page 7 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 07/06/2017 NBP - Returned Letter Sorter -32.92 07/15/2017 101-41310-421990 07/06/2017 Amazon - Coffee 114.88 07/15/2017 101-41310-421990 07/06/2017 Amazon - Paper Plates, Paper Towels, Kleenex,1 122.14 07/15/2017 101-41310-421990 07/06/2017 Holiday - Unleaded Fuel 7.628 gals @ $2.229 17.00 07/15/2017 217-41990-421200 07/06/2017 Holiday - Unleaded Fuel 10.314 gals @ $2.259 23.30 07/15/2017 217-41990-421200 07/06/2017 Grady's - Lock for File Cabinet 13.99 07/15/2017 101-41310-421990 07/06/2017 Grady's - Carpet Sprayer 17.99 07/15/2017 226-45126-422990 07/06/2017 Grady's - Key 1.99 07/15/2017 226-45126-431990 07/06/2017 Grady's - Cable; Ferrule & Stop for Gator Repair 15.13 07/15/2017 226-45126-440440 07/06/2017 Grady's - Snap Rings (10) for Hand Dryer in Wo 2.30 07/15/2017 226-45126-440440 07/06/2017 Walmart - Snacks & Juice for F. I. 33.88 07/15/2017 226-45127-421981 07/06/2017 Walmart - White Board Cleaner for F. I. 5.94 07/15/2017 226-45127-421981 07/06/2017 Walmart - Protein Bars for Concession 38.33 07/15/2017 226-45125-425410 07/06/2017 Cub - Snacks for Meeting 17.78 07/15/2017 101-41310-443990 07/06/2017 Cub - Milk for F. I. 8.96 07/15/2017 226-45127-421981 07/06/2017 Target - Food for CC Meeting 29.99 07/15/2017 101-41110-443990 07/06/2017 Runnings- G. C for Safety Bingo Prize 40.00 07/15/2017 101-41800-421990 07/06/2017 Constant Contact - Monthly Email Service 60.00 07/15/2017 226-45122-430900 07/06/2017 Monti Printing - Plan Review Stamps (6) 199.00 07/15/2017 101-42400-421990 07/06/2017 American Red Cross - CPR Training for Guest S 108.00 07/15/2017 226-45122-433100 07/06/2017 Eventbrite - 2017 Accela Finance Nat'l Training 499.00 07/15/2017 101-41520-433100 07/06/2017 Eventbrite - Airfare to Accela Nat'l Training Pori 393.00 07/15/2017 101-41520-433100 07/06/2017 Ausco - Staff Shirts 162.50 07/15/2017 226-45122-421110 07/06/2017 Ausco - Kids Shirts for F.I (65) 552.50 07/15/2017 226-45127-421981 07/06/2017 Ausco - Staff Shirts (21) 178.50 07/15/2017 226-45127-421110 07/06/2017 Ausco - Staff Shirts (52) 338.00 07/15/2017 226-45122-421110 07/06/2017 Monti Vacuum Center - Box of Bags for F.I Vact 17.95 07/15/2017 226-45127-421981 07/06/2017 Paula Paulson - Ceiling Drape for Wedding 425.00 07/15/2017 226-45123-431990 07/06/2017 Pier B Resort - Hotel for Excel Training (DC) 406.58 07/15/2017 101-42400-433100 07/06/2017 Dacotah Paper - Bathroom Supplies 33.86 07/15/2017 217-41990-421990 07/06/2017 Paypal-CSP Outdoors- ZPARKS-MOVTIV-(3) - -11.20 07/15/2017 101-45201-421990 07/06/2017 Monti Napa- pelican Mirror 11.29 07/15/2017 101-43120-422100 07/06/2017 Grady's - scrub brush for washing trucks 11.99 07/15/2017 101-43127-421100 07/06/2017 Walgreens - sharpies; wall calender 18.12 07/15/2017 609-49754-421990 07/06/2017 Runnings- (4) 24pk water; charcoal- Montiview 18.45 07/15/2017 101-45201-421650 07/06/2017 Von Hanson -Montivew clean up day 25.15 07/15/2017 101-45201-421650 07/06/2017 Office Max - (2) sharpie; desk calendar 28.82 07/15/2017 609-49754-421990 07/06/2017 Facebook- Riverfest Promo. 31.89 07/15/2017 609-49754-434990 07/06/2017 General Rental -ZPARKS-ELLPRK- Power Troi 60.06 07/15/2017 229-45202-453010 07/06/2017 General Rental -ZPARKS-ELLPRK- Screed Cor 76.00 07/15/2017 229-45202-453010 07/06/2017 Cub Foods- resale(145) limes; (12) lemons 96.88 07/15/2017 609-49750-425500 07/06/2017 G & K - mats- mv. #6043795590; #6043801259 106.77 07/15/2017 609-49754-431990 07/06/2017 Home Depot - Exp. Joint; (10) 24' stl. stake; (10) 119.54 07/15/2017 101-43120-422400 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/14/2017 - 1:34 PM) Page 8 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number 07/06/2017 Elk Rvr Landfill- ZPARKS-MONTIV- Clean-up 201.80 07/15/2017 101-45201-431990 07/06/2017 Sherwin Williams - (2) 5gal white 206.00 07/15/2017 101-45203-421990 07/06/2017 BigMouth.com- resale- (36) cooler bags 324.00 07/15/2017 609-49750-425400 07/06/2017 Aramark May 2017 - Parks 94.52 07/15/2017 101-45201-441700 07/06/2017 Aramark May 2017 - Sewer 72.72 07/15/2017 602-49490-441700 07/06/2017 Aramark May 2017 - Water 72.72 07/15/2017 601-49440-441700 07/06/2017 Aramark May 2017 - PW Uniforms 181.24 07/15/2017 101-43120-441700 07/06/2017 Aramark May 2017 shop towels 168.90 07/15/2017 101-43127-421990 07/06/2017 Arctic Glacier - resale - inv.716310;716709;717. 771.43 07/15/2017 609-49750-425500 07/06/2017 Dacotah Paper - (10) 100pk can liner; hand soap, 580.24 07/15/2017 101-45201-421650 07/06/2017 Dacotah Paper - (6) cs paper towel; (2) cs cups; c 255.48 07/15/2017 101-43127-421990 07/06/2017 Midwwest Landscapers -Shrubs (69) asst. 2,200.65 07/15/2017 101-43120-422500 07/06/2017 Hillyard - Floor Cleaners 182.13 07/15/2017 226-45126-421990 07/06/2017 Walmart.com - Socks for Resale at Concession (1 17.88 07/15/2017 226-45125-425411 07/06/2017 Walmart.com - Cleaning Supplies 27.96 07/15/2017 226-45122-421990 07/06/2017 Grady's - Filters for Pool; Brushes for Tile 37.93 07/15/2017 226-45126-422990 07/06/2017 Grady's - Hardware for Garbage Door at Prairie 1 9.83 07/15/2017 101-41941-422990 07/06/2017 Ausco - Staff Clothing 5/20 Invoice 632.00 07/15/2017 226-00000-115030 07/06/2017 Ausco - Staff Clothing 5/20 Invoice 18.00 07/15/2017 226-45122-421110 Check Total: 93,757.75 Vendor: 2438 VANCO SERVICES LLC Check Sequence: 7 00008277830 Vanco - Gateway Exchange - June 2017 17.90 07/15/2017 656-49870-443980 00008277830 Vanco - Gateway Exchange - June 2017 60.16 07/15/2017 601-49440-443980 00008277830 Vanco - Gateway Exchange - June 2017 60.16 07/15/2017 602-49490-443980 Check Total: Total for Check Run: Total of Number of Checks: 138.22 159,788.10 7 Reference ACH Enabled: True The preceding list of bills payables was reviewed and approved for payment. Date: 7/24/17 Approved by: Mayor Brian Stumpf AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/14/2017 - 1:34 PM) Page 9 Accounts Payable Computer Check Proof List by Vendor User: Julie.Cheney Printed: 07/19/2017 - 2:43PM Batch: 00203.07.2017 - 203.07.2017 AP Invoice No Description Vendor: 1003 AM PROMOTIONS 7/10/2017 Bags for Power of Produce Kids Club Promotior Check Sequence: 1 Check Total: Vendor: 3878 ACI ASPHALT & CONCRETE, INC 61524 226-00000-220100 Resurface- Meadow Park Basketball Court 61525 Cracksealing; Resurface- West Bridge Park 61526 Resurface; Crackseal; Patching; Traffic Control Check Total: Vendor: 1021 AME RED E MIX INC 113742 False ZPARKS-ELLPRK- (11) CY 4000AE; (11) BG 1 113911 101-45201-440800 ZPARKS-ELLPRK- (6) CY 4000AE; (6) BG Bu Check Total: Vendor: 1977 ANCOM COMMUNICATIONS INC 70866 Stand. Palm Mic 07/25/2017 101-45201-453010 Check Total: Vendor: 3991 ANOKA RAMSEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE 7/11/2017 Seasonal Safety Training 6/5; AWAIR Training E Check Total: Vendor: 1036 APEC AQUISITIONS INC 121809 False Filters 16x123 (6) 07/25/2017 229-45202-453010 Check Total: Vendor: 3491 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY Moiiii6effo Y Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Check Sequence: 1 ACH Enabled: False 963.47 07/25/2017 226-00000-220100 963.47 Check Sequence: 2 ACH Enabled: False 561.63 07/25/2017 101-45201-440800 842.91 07/25/2017 101-45201-440800 47,906.39 07/25/2017 101-45201-453010 49,310.93 Check Sequence: 3 ACH Enabled: False 1,664.00 07/25/2017 229-45202-453010 919.00 07/25/2017 229-45202-453010 2,583.00 Check Sequence: 4 ACH Enabled: False 88.00 07/25/2017 101-42200-421990 88.00 Check Sequence: 5 ACH Enabled: False 1,350.00 07/25/2017 101-41800-431960 1,350.00 Check Sequence: 6 ACH Enabled: True 169.88 07/25/2017 226-45126-422990 169.88 Check Sequence: 7 ACH Enabled: False AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/19/2017 - 2:43 PM) Page 1 Invoice No Description 3191660 resale - beer Amount Payment Date Check Total: Vendor: 4502 ARVIG 265114 June 2017- Calix; Border States; Adv. Media Tec 265115 Enetwork Supply; return Vecima Networks -orig Check Total: Vendor: 1061 BBF PROPERTIES INC TIF 1-22 Pay As You Go - 1st 2017 07/25/2017 656-49877-421800 Check Total: Vendor: 1064 BECKER SOD LLC 10855 ZPARKS-ELLPRK- (450) yds sod delivered 10864 ACH Enabled: False ZPARKS-ELLPRK- (75) yds sod picked up 07/25/2017 213-46581-465110 Check Total: Vendor: 1065 BELLBOY CORPORATION 59622400 resale - liquor 59622400 ACH Enabled: False freight 59743800 229-45202-453010 freight 59743800 07/25/2017 resale - wine 59743800 1,095.80 resale - liquor 96083600 resale - mix 96083600 Check Sequence: 11 freight 648.53 07/25/2017 Check Total: Vendor: 1067 BERNICK'S 73417 resale - pop, water, juice, milk 75742 609-49750-433300 resale - soda pop 75742 07/25/2017 resale -juice 75743 762.00 resale - beer 76389 Pop 7733 609-49750-425500 reslae - coffee 78763 07/25/2017 resale -juice 78763 1,723.38 resale - soda pop 78764 resale - beer 78932 Check Sequence: 12 reslae - pop, gatorade Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 233.50 07/25/2017 609-49750-425200 233.50 Check Sequence: 8 ACH Enabled: True 15,270.39 07/25/2017 656-49877-421800 806.39 07/25/2017 656-49877-421800 16,076.78 Check Sequence: 9 ACH Enabled: False 18,416.12 07/25/2017 213-46581-465110 18,416.12 Check Sequence: 10 ACH Enabled: False 942.50 07/25/2017 229-45202-453010 153.30 07/25/2017 229-45202-453010 1,095.80 Check Sequence: 11 ACH Enabled: True 648.53 07/25/2017 609-49750-425100 7.43 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 18.00 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 216.00 07/25/2017 609-49750-425300 762.00 07/25/2017 609-49750-425100 71.09 07/25/2017 609-49750-425500 0.33 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 1,723.38 Check Sequence: 12 ACH Enabled: False 596.42 07/25/2017 226-45125-425410 123.50 07/25/2017 609-49750-425400 16.40 07/25/2017 609-49750-425500 1,765.90 07/25/2017 609-49750-425200 160.00 07/25/2017 226-45123-421460 131.04 07/25/2017 226-45125-425410 49.20 07/25/2017 609-49750-425500 87.00 07/25/2017 609-49750-425400 2,792.50 07/25/2017 609-49750-425200 307.50 07/25/2017 226-45125-425410 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/19/2017 - 2:43 PM) Page 2 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number 6,029.46 Reference Check Total: Vendor: 1080 BRAEMAR MAILING SERVICE INC 58158 UB June 2017 Invoices (3785) Print, Fold, Envel 58158 UB June 2017 Invoices (3785) Print, Fold, Envel 58158 UB June 2017 Invoices (3785) DMV Insert 58158 UB June 2017 Invoices (3785) FNM Insert 58158 UB June 2017 Invoices (3785) MCC Insert 217-41990-434990 Check Total: Vendor: 3632 BRIAN BRAMLEY 8994 Air Quality tst; Comprss. Srvc; (25) ACBA Flo -A 18.93 Check Total: Vendor: 4738 BRAND MANUFACTURING 57967 set of (2) stainless steel chutes- Fire Dept. Check Total: Vendor: 4328 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN WINE & SPII 1080659005 resale - liquor 1080659005 resale - wine 1080659005 freight 1080659006 resale - beer 1080662296 resale - liquor 1080662296 resale - wine 1080662296 freight 766.47 Check Total: Vendor: 1084 BROCK WHITE COMPANY LLC 12798094 ZPARKS-ELLPRK- (23) 30BX 10OZ. Limeston 12798816 ZPARKS-ELLPRK- Kure & Seal; concrete clear Check Total: Vendor: 2890 BROTHERS FIRE PROTECTION CO 104167 Maintenace on Fire Extinguishers (7) 609-49750-425100 Check Total: Vendor: 1091 CAMPBELL KNUTSON PA Amount Payment Date Acct Number 6,029.46 Reference AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/19/2017 - 2:43 PM) Page 3 Check Sequence: 13 ACH Enabled: False 554.69 07/25/2017 601-49440-431800 554.70 07/25/2017 602-49490-431800 18.92 07/25/2017 217-41990-434990 37.85 07/25/2017 656-00000-202099 18.93 07/25/2017 226-45122-434990 1,185.09 Check Sequence: 14 ACH Enabled: True 2,389.00 07/25/2017 101-42200-440440 2,389.00 Check Sequence: 15 ACH Enabled: False 766.47 07/25/2017 101-42200-421990 766.47 Check Sequence: 16 ACH Enabled: False 2,542.40 07/25/2017 609-49750-425100 644.32 07/25/2017 609-49750-425300 33.84 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 182.70 07/25/2017 609-49750-425200 1,506.71 07/25/2017 609-49750-425100 496.00 07/25/2017 609-49750-425300 37.13 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 5,443.10 Check Sequence: 17 ACH Enabled: False 158.73 07/25/2017 229-45202-453010 242.91 07/25/2017 229-45202-453010 401.64 Check Sequence: 18 ACH Enabled: True 259.00 07/25/2017 226-45126-431990 259.00 Check Sequence: 19 ACH Enabled: True AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/19/2017 - 2:43 PM) Page 3 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 2348-103G 114 FiberNet General 160.00 07/25/2017 656-49870-430400 2348-142G 1 Estate of John Ellison (Conveyance) 2,078.36 07/25/2017 400-43300-430400 Check Total: 2,238.36 Vendor: 4646 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES L.P. Check Sequence: 20 ACH Enabled: True 1941547 resale - beer 12,539.55 07/25/2017 609-49750-425200 1941547 resale - beer n/a 181.70 07/25/2017 609-49750-425400 1941547 resale - wine 72.92 07/25/2017 609-49750-425300 1946552 resale - beer 10,753.80 07/25/2017 609-49750-425200 1946552 resale - beer n/a 279.55 07/25/2017 609-49750-425400 Check Total: 23,827.52 Vendor: 1094 CAREFREE LAWN SERVICE INC Check Sequence: 21 ACH Enabled: True 16237 (2) mowings 6/7 & 20; Litter/Debris Removal 320.00 07/25/2017 101-45201-431050 16237 (2) mowings Riverside -6/17 & 29 1,100.00 07/25/2017 651-49010-431050 Check Total: 1,420.00 Vendor: 4089 CARLSON & LYTER DISTRIBUTING, INC Check Sequence: 22 ACH Enabled: True 375-95 resale - beer 114.10 07/25/2017 609-49750-425200 733197 resale - beer 82.50 07/25/2017 609-49750-425200 Check Total: 196.60 Vendor: 1106 CENTRAL MCGOWAN INC Check Sequence: 23 ACH Enabled: False 00091321 Monthly Tank Rental 45.00 07/25/2017 226-45124-421600 00129490 Bulk Carbon Dioxide (227 lbs) 72.40 07/25/2017 226-45124-421600 00131667 Bulk Carbon Dioxide (296 lbs) 86.20 07/25/2017 226-45124-421600 00133195 Bulk Carbon Dioxide (352 lbs) 97.40 07/25/2017 226-45124-421600 Check Total: 301.00 Vendor: 4315 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS Check Sequence: 24 ACH Enabled: False 7/1/2017 Digital Receiver 7.91 07/25/2017 101-41110-431990 Check Total: 7.91 Vendor: 4740 KEN CHRISTIANSEN Check Sequence: 25 ACH Enabled: False 7/17/2017 Reimburse Over Paid Membership Fees 11.00 07/25/2017 226-45127-347910 Check Total: 11.00 Vendor: 3883 CLAYTON'S APPLIANCE REPAIR Check Sequence: 26 ACH Enabled: False AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/19/2017 - 2:43 PM) Page 4 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 44169 Labor/Serv. Call- Refrigerator Knob replaced 119.00 07/25/2017 101-45201-431990 44169 Parts/Shipping- Refrigerator Knob replaced 45.67 07/25/2017 101-45201-431990 Check Total: 164.67 Vendor: 1973 CLIMATE MAKERS INC Check Sequence: 27 ACH Enabled: False 55641 Repair A/C @ Prairie Center 424.35 07/25/2017 101-41941-431990 55811 Credit on Inv #55641 - Repair A/C @ Prairie Cei -108.23 07/25/2017 101-41941-431990 Check Total: 316.12 Vendor: 2511 CONSOLIDATED CONTAINER COMPANY L Check Sequence: 28 ACH Enabled: False 101462 (53) 55gal Containers- Green 1,256.03 07/25/2017 101-45201-421650 Check Total: 1,256.03 Vendor: 1092 CSI SOFTWARE INC Check Sequence: 29 ACH Enabled: True 92097 Annual Software & Hosting Fees 9,520.17 07/25/2017 226-45122-430900 Check Total: 9,520.17 Vendor: 4205 MICHAEL CYR Check Sequence: 30 ACH Enabled: False TIF 1-29 Pay As You Go 1st 2017 Principal 4,044.91 07/25/2017 213-46529-465110 TIF 1-29 Pay As You Go 1 st 2017 Interest 5,968.55 07/25/2017 213-46529-465110 Check Total: 10,013.46 Vendor: 1129 DAHLHEIMER BEVERAGE LLC Check Sequence: 31 ACH Enabled: True 1289431 resale - beer 23,649.32 07/25/2017 609-49750-425200 1289431 resale - beer n/a 295.50 07/25/2017 609-49750-425400 1289448 resale - beer 9,836.10 07/25/2017 609-49750-425200 152285 resale - beer credit inv. 151804 -51.00 07/25/2017 609-49750-425200 152429 resale - beer credit -56.00 07/25/2017 609-49750-425200 152493 resale - beer 397.85 07/25/2017 609-49750-425200 152646 resale - beer credit -7.30 07/25/2017 609-49750-425200 152652 resale - beer 1,180.00 07/25/2017 226-45125-425410 152775 resale - beer 120.00 07/25/2017 609-49750-425200 152787 resale - beer 19,114.68 07/25/2017 609-49750-425200 152787 resale - beer n/a 144.40 07/25/2017 609-49750-425400 152929 resale - beer 284.90 07/25/2017 609-49750-425200 152929 resale - beer n/a 168.00 07/25/2017 609-49750-425400 153037 resale - beer 315.00 07/25/2017 609-49750-425200 153191 resale - beer 817.25 07/25/2017 609-49750-425200 153376 resale - beer -20.00 07/25/2017 609-49750-425200 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/19/2017 - 2:43 PM) Page 5 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number 153935 resale - beer 459.00 07/25/2017 609-49750-425200 153955 resale - beer 460.00 07/25/2017 609-49750-425200 7/15/17 resale - beer- (3) Mount. Ale 101.40 07/25/2017 609-49750-425200 7/15/17-2 resale - beer -(5) Henry's Hard Grape 112.00 07/25/2017 609-49750-425200 Check Total: 57,321.10 Vendor: 4475 DAKOTA SUPPLY GROUP Check Sequence: 32 D123858 Valve Flush Kits (3) 595.47 07/25/2017 226-45126-422990 D133790 PVC Pipe - Various 336.33 07/25/2017 226-45126-421990 Check Total: 931.80 Vendor: 1153 ECM PUBLISHERS INC Check Sequence: 33 505339 201722 - KB Properties Hearing #702933 101.53 07/25/2017 101-41910-435100 505340 201721 - Larson Building Hearing Ad #702936 101.53 07/25/2017 101-41910-435100 505341 Outdoor Storage Hearing Ad# 702939 92.30 07/25/2017 101-41910-435100 505342 Small Area Business Hearing Ad# 702948 92.30 07/25/2017 101-41910-435100 505343 2017011 - Camping World Hearing Ad# 705799 110.76 07/25/2017 101-41910-435100 507773 201719 - PH Vacation of Drainage & Utility Eas 221.52 07/25/2017 101-41910-435100 509369 Ad #703088 - Riverfest 460.00 07/25/2017 609-49754-434990 511279 Ad #703087 - Sat. Shop & Save July Wine Sale 287.00 07/25/2017 609-49754-434990 Check Total: 1,466.94 Vendor: 2561 FERGUSON WATERWORKS #2516 Check Sequence: 34 0248031 (10) 150" Gskt; (25) 2 Rub DI Meter Gskt; (25) 101.16 07/25/2017 601-49440-422710 0249803 1 T10 Meter Ecdr Usg 1/Tip; LF 1 T10 MTR V4 605.72 07/25/2017 601-49440-422710 Check Total: 706.88 Vendor: 2273 FIBERNET MONTICELLO - ACH Check Sequence: 35 7/8/2017 City Hall Phone - July 2017 950.21 07/25/2017 702-00000-432100 7/8/2017 MCC Phone - July 2017 431.64 07/25/2017 702-00000-432100 7/8/2017 Ballfields Phone - July 2017 19.42 07/25/2017 702-00000-432100 7/8/2017 DMV Phone - July 2017 279.48 07/25/2017 702-00000-432100 7/8/2017 Hi Way Liquor Phone - July 2017 286.39 07/25/2017 702-00000-432100 7/8/2017 Fire Hall Phone - July 2017 242.31 07/25/2017 702-00000-432100 7/8/2017 Public Works Phone - July 2017 290.62 07/25/2017 702-00000-432100 7/8/2017 Parks Phone - July 2017 113.70 07/25/2017 702-00000-432100 7/8/2017 Prairie Center Phone - July 2017 14.16 07/25/2017 702-00000-432100 7/8/2017 Sheriff Phone - July 2017 69.72 07/25/2017 702-00000-432100 7/8/2017 City Hall Internet - July 2017 124.95 07/25/2017 702-00000-432300 7/8/2017 MCC Internet - July 2017 10.00 07/25/2017 702-00000-432300 Reference ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: True AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/19/2017 - 2:43 PM) Page 6 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 7/8/2017 Ballfields Internet - July 2017 10.00 07/25/2017 702-00000-432300 7/8/2017 DMV Internet - July 2017 41.95 07/25/2017 702-00000-432300 7/8/2017 Hi Way Liquor Internet - July 2017 41.95 07/25/2017 702-00000-432300 7/8/2017 Fire Hall Internet - July 2017 41.95 07/25/2017 702-00000-432300 7/8/2017 Animal Shelter Internet - July 2017 29.95 07/25/2017 702-00000-432300 7/8/2017 Public Works Internet - July 2017 69.95 07/25/2017 702-00000-432300 7/8/2017 Sheriff Internet - July 2017 41.95 07/25/2017 702-00000-432300 7/8/2017 City Hall Cable - July 2017 12.95 07/25/2017 101-41310-431990 7/8/2017 MCC Cable - July 2017 319.39 07/25/2017 226-45127-432500 7/8/2017 Data Hosting - July 2017 500.00 07/25/2017 702-00000-431900 7/8/2017 Service Contract - July 2017 250.00 07/25/2017 702-00000-431900 Check Total: 4,192.64 Vendor: 1180 FIRST HOSPITAL LABORATORIES INC Check Sequence: 36 ACH Enabled: False FL00177040 DOT Urine Drug Screen- Roger H. 50.95 07/25/2017 101-43120-431990 Check Total: 50.95 Vendor: 1413 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL INC Check Sequence: 37 ACH Enabled: True 7060577 June 2017 (319) tickets- 1/2 215.33 07/25/2017 601-49440-432770 7060577 June 2017 (319) tickets- 1/2 215.32 07/25/2017 656-00000-202099 Check Total: 430.65 Vendor: 4743 GRAND CASTLE Check Sequence: 38 ACH Enabled: False 7/11/2017 Escrow Refund - 413 4th St W 2,000.00 07/25/2017 101-00000-220110 Check Total: 2,000.00 Vendor: 1223 HAWKINS INC Check Sequence: 39 ACH Enabled: True 4097876 Pool Chemicals -48.09 07/25/2017 226-45124-421600 4098335 Pool Chemicals -15.24 07/25/2017 226-45124-421600 4106421 Pool Chemicals 786.93 07/25/2017 226-45124-421600 Check Total: 723.60 Vendor: 1228 HERC U LIFT INC Check Sequence: 40 ACH Enabled: False W334140-2 Lift Motor Repair 238.14 07/25/2017 226-45126-431990 Check Total: 238.14 Vendor: 3092 HIRSHFIELDS - MONTICELLO Check Sequence: 41 ACH Enabled: False 30044733 Picnic Table (2) 4gal dark green; (5) tray liner 102.43 07/25/2017 101-45201-421650 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/19/2017 - 2:43 PM) Page 7 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 102.43 Check Total: Vendor: 1239 HOGLUND BUS COMPANY INC 126757 Spartan Metro Star- Left Rear brake; brackets - I 170626121 Check Total: Vendor: 4218 HOHENSTEINS, INC 000132 resale - beer 904218 resale - beer Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 102.43 Check Total: Vendor: 1244 HORIZON COMMERCIAL POOL SUPPLY 170626121 Pool Chemicals ACH Enabled: Check Total: Vendor: 3369 JAKE'S EXCAVATING INC 3183 Christenson 6/17/17 624.36 Check Total: Vendor: 1259 JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING 2685219 resale - beer 2685219 Enabled: resale - beer n/a 2685219 07/25/2017 freight 2689763 resale - beer 2689763 07/25/2017 freight Check Total: Vendor: 1260 JME OF MONTICELLO INC 66586 ZPARKS-ELLPRK- (117) Riverrock 66648 ZPARKS-ELLPRK- (54) Riverrock 66650 Enabled: ZPARKS-ELLPRK- (12) Londonstone Riverfocl 180.04 07/25/2017 Check Total: Vendor: 1263 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 5763842 resale - liquor 5763842 freight 5763843 resale - mix 5763843 Enabled: freight Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 102.43 Check Sequence: 42 ACH Enabled: True 624.36 07/25/2017 101-42200-440500 624.36 Check Sequence: 43 ACH Enabled: False 994.00 07/25/2017 609-49750-425200 1,156.50 07/25/2017 609-49750-425200 2,150.50 Check Sequence: 44 ACH Enabled: False 180.04 07/25/2017 226-45124-421600 180.04 Check Sequence: 45 ACH Enabled: True 450.00 07/25/2017 651-49010-431150 450.00 Check Sequence: 46 ACH Enabled: False 1,939.20 07/25/2017 609-49750-425200 21.50 07/25/2017 609-49750-425400 3.00 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 3,498.34 07/25/2017 609-49750-425200 3.00 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 5,465.04 Check Sequence: 47 ACH Enabled: True 627.45 07/25/2017 229-45202-453010 345.10 07/25/2017 229-45202-453010 60.10 07/25/2017 229-45202-453010 1,032.65 Check Sequence: 48 ACH Enabled: False 8,777.08 07/25/2017 609-49750-425100 95.40 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 70.00 07/25/2017 609-49750-425400 2.88 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/19/2017 - 2:43 PM) Page 8 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 5765041 freight 87.13 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 5765041 resale - liquor 7,603.70 07/25/2017 609-49750-425100 5765042 resale - Mix 124.05 07/25/2017 609-49750-425400 5765042 resale - wine 824.80 07/25/2017 609-49750-425300 5765042 freight 33.12 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 5765043 resale - beer 153.93 07/25/2017 609-49750-425200 5767883 resale - liquor 1,937.90 07/25/2017 609-49750-425100 5767883 freight 8.15 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 5767884 freight 13.68 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 5767884 resale - wine 825.46 07/25/2017 609-49750-425300 5767885 resale - liquor 5,649.98 07/25/2017 609-49750-425100 5767885 freight 67.67 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 5767886 freight 7.20 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 5767886 resale - mix 120.30 07/25/2017 609-49750-425400 5767887 resale - beer 123.00 07/25/2017 609-49750-425200 5769525 resale - ligiuor 6,710.64 07/25/2017 609-49750-425100 5769525 freight 81.12 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 5769526 freight 90.01 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 5769526 resale - wine 3,268.02 07/25/2017 609-49750-425300 5769526 resale - mix 171.00 07/25/2017 609-49750-425400 5769527 resale - beer 65.97 07/25/2017 609-49750-425200 5770836 freight 1.44 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 5770837 freight 18.72 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 5770837 resale - wine 564.25 07/25/2017 609-49750-425300 5773602 resale - liquor 6,124.99 07/25/2017 609-49750-425100 5773602 freight 116.65 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 5773603 freight 7.20 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 5773603 resale - wine 237.50 07/25/2017 609-49750-425300 632850 resale - wine credit inv. #5758245 -52.00 07/25/2017 609-49750-425300 632850 freightcredit inv. #5758245 -1.44 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 633399 resale - wine credit inv #5720390 -13.15 07/25/2017 609-49750-425300 633400 resale - wine credit inv #5692842 -7.33 07/25/2017 609-49750-425300 633401 resale - wine credit inv #5758245 -9.65 07/25/2017 609-49750-425300 633402 resale -Liquor credit inv #5762471 -76.50 07/25/2017 609-49750-425100 633402 freight credit inv #5762471 -1.44 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 633775 freight credit inv #5763842 -4.32 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 633775 resale - ligiuort credit inv #5763842 -302.10 07/25/2017 609-49750-425100 634027 resale - ligiuor credit inv #5763842 -238.29 07/25/2017 609-49750-425100 634027 freight credit inv #5763842 -2.88 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 Check Total: 43,273.84 Vendor: 2641 JOHNSON MATERIALS INC Check Sequence: 49 ACH Enabled: False AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/19/2017 - 2:43 PM) Page 9 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 3009 ZPARKS-ELLPRK- (70.3) CL5 Base 406.17 07/25/2017 229-45202-453010 3132 ZPARKS-ELLPRK- (37.06) CL5 Base 214.95 07/25/2017 229-45202-453010 3133 ZPARKS-ELLPRK- (20.22) Con Bit 219.39 07/25/2017 229-45202-453010 3162 (17.76) CL5 Base 103.00 07/25/2017 101-43120-422400 Check Total: 943.51 Vendor: 1274 KNIFE RIVER CORPORATION -NORTH CEN' Check Sequence: 50 ACH Enabled: False 42224 ZPARKS-ELLPRK- (11.5)CY 4000 EXT; (11.5) 1,937.63 07/25/2017 229-45202-453010 Check Total: 1,937.63 Vendor: 4494 LAXMI HOTEL INC Check Sequence: 51 ACH Enabled: False TIF 1-22.5 Pay As You Go - 1st 2017 Interest 4,335.39 07/25/2017 213-46585-465110 Check Total: 4,335.39 Vendor: 1292 LEROY JOB TRUCKING INC Check Sequence: 52 ACH Enabled: True 18840 Animal Charge (2) 23.40 07/25/2017 101-42700-431990 Check Total: 23.40 Vendor: 4456 LUPULIN BREWING LLC Check Sequence: 53 ACH Enabled: True 1866 resale - beer 378.00 07/25/2017 609-49750-425200 1952 resale - beer 495.00 07/25/2017 609-49750-425200 Check Total: 873.00 Vendor: 1303 M AMUNDSON CIGAR & CANDY CO, LLP Check Sequence: 54 ACH Enabled: True 241096 resale - cigarettes; juice 1,118.14 07/25/2017 609-49750-425500 241096 resale - tobacco; soda pop; cork screws; can cool 420.68 07/25/2017 609-49750-425400 Check Total: 1,538.82 Vendor: 2819 MADDEN GALANTER HANSEN LLP Check Sequence: 55 ACH Enabled: False June 2017 Labor Relations Services - June 2017 72.84 07/25/2017 101-41800-430400 Check Total: 72.84 Vendor: 1229 MARRS ADVERTISING & DESIGN INC Check Sequence: 56 ACH Enabled: True 1436 (500) business cards Matt T. 52.00 07/25/2017 601-49440-421990 Check Total: 52.00 Vendor: 3745 MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY Check Sequence: 57 ACH Enabled: True AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/19/2017 - 2:43 PM) Page 10 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 20360391 (500) gal. diesel @ $2.05 1,027.16 07/25/2017 101-43120-421200 20360401 (698) gal. unleaded @ $1.94 1,357.21 07/25/2017 101-43120-421200 Check Total: 2,384.37 Vendor: 1309 MARTIE'S FARM SERVICE INC Check Sequence: 58 ACH Enabled: False 344929 Cat Food; Salt Pellets (6) 65.04 07/25/2017 101-42700-443990 Check Total: 65.04 Vendor: 4742 DAVE & kATHY MATUSKA Check Sequence: 59 ACH Enabled: False 7/7/2017 PID 155-062-001010 - 2012-2017 Principal Pd c 497.42 07/25/2017 300-00000-361010 7/7/2017 PID 155-062-001010 - 2012-2017 Interest Pd Stj 129.34 07/25/2017 300-00000-361020 Check Total: 626.76 Vendor: 1314 MCDOWALL COMPANY Check Sequence: 60 ACH Enabled: False 235236 Contract C0560- cooler fans iced up 1,082.18 07/25/2017 609-49754-440440 235238 Contract C0520 - Replace Spring Return Actuatc 557.58 07/25/2017 226-45126-431990 Check Total: 1,639.76 Vendor: 3816 MINNESOTA PIPE & EQUIPMENT COMPAN Check Sequence: 61 ACH Enabled: False 0380817 (10) Traffic Repair Kit for Pacer 2,011.80 07/25/2017 601-49440-422220 0380819 (100) Cplug w/ Gkt- 3/4" Meter 917.01 07/25/2017 601-49440-422220 0380853 Upper Valve Rod w/ stud & nuts 171.91 07/25/2017 601-49440-422220 Check Total: 3,100.72 Vendor: 1738 MN DEPT OF HEALTH Check Sequence: 62 ACH Enabled: False Qtr 2 2017 Community Water Supply Service Conn. Fee Qti 6,761.00 07/25/2017 601-49440-443750 Check Total: 6,761.00 Vendor: 1349 MN DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION Check Sequence: 63 ACH Enabled: False P00008086 15C004 - MNDOT Material Testing & Inspectioi 104.47 07/25/2017 400-43300-459014 Check Total: 104.47 Vendor: 1743 CITY OF MONTICELLO Check Sequence: 64 ACH Enabled: False 7/17/2017 Sewer Camera Rebuild (MT) (1/27/17) 60.00 07/25/2017 602-49490-422100 7/17/2017 Refund to Customer - CC Was Charged Wrong A 1.00 07/25/2017 101-00000-202010 7/17/2017 AG Preservation Fee to County (JT) (4/12/17) 5.00 07/25/2017 229-45202-453011 7/19/2017 2 Pairs of IOlnAnkle Weights (1/24/17) 32.04 07/25/2017 226-45127-421720 7/19/2017 Ping Pong Balls (3/26/17) 6.39 07/25/2017 226-45127-421460 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/19/2017 - 2:43 PM) Page 11 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number 7/19/2017 FI Supplies - 5/19/17 10.79 07/25/2017 226-45127-421981 7/19/2017 FI Supplies - 6/1/17 20.85 07/25/2017 226-45127-421981 7/19/2017 FI Supplies (Crayons, Art Books, Bags) - 6/1/17 13.00 07/25/2017 226-45127-421981 7/19/2017 FI Supplies (Tinker Toys & Lincoln Logs) - 6/2/ 10.00 07/25/2017 226-45127-421981 7/19/2017 FI Supplies (Art Easel) - 6/2/17 18.00 07/25/2017 226-45127-421981 7/19/2017 FI Supplies (Lincoln Logs) - 6/7/17 10.00 07/25/2017 226-45127-421981 7/19/2017 FI Field Trip Lockers @ Como Zoo -6/20/17 10.00 07/25/2017 226-45127-441500 7/19/2017 FI Supplies (Misc Games) - 6/26/17 10.64 07/25/2017 226-45127-421981 7/19/2017 Parking @ Rural Water School (3 Days - MT) (3 15.00 07/25/2017 601-49440-433100 7/19/2017 Light Bulbs (3) (4/10/17) 4.56 07/25/2017 101-43110-421990 Check Total: 227.27 Vendor: 1377 MONTICELLO SENIOR CENTER Check Sequence: 65 July 2017 Monthly Allocation - July 2017 4,880.00 07/25/2017 101-45175-444310 Check Total: 4,880.00 Vendor: 4186 MONTICELLO TOWING, LLC Check Sequence: 66 21732 Chip Seal Proj- Tow Commuter Lot- Civic Wind 150.00 07/25/2017 101-43120-440990 Check Total: 150.00 Vendor: 4549 ANN MOSACK Check Sequence: 67 6/23/2017 Mileage Reimbursement - 111.3 miles 59.55 07/25/2017 226-45122-433100 Check Total: 59.55 Vendor: 1687 NORTHLAND SECURITIES INC Check Sequence: 68 5013 Property Tax Abatement Project 1,750.00 07/25/2017 213-46301-431990 Check Total: 1,750.00 Vendor: 1401 NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS Check Sequence: 69 23039 June 2017 - Technical Assistance - City Projects 2,271.58 07/25/2017 101-41910-431990 23040 201710 - Spaeth Industrial PUD Concept - June : 929.10 07/25/2017 101-00000-220110 23040 201712 - Carlisle Paxmar PUD Amendment - Ju 81.50 07/25/2017 101-00000-220110 23040 201716 - Red Rooster PUD Amendment - June 2 733.50 07/25/2017 101-00000-220110 23040 201721 - Lamont Travel Center PUD - June 201 961.70 07/25/2017 101-00000-220110 23040 201720 - Autumn Ridge PUD Amendment - Jun 978.00 07/25/2017 101-00000-220110 23040 201717 - Mills Fleet Farm Sign PUD - June 201 782.40 07/25/2017 101-00000-220110 23040 201720 - Weinand - Paxmar Residential Concept 423.80 07/25/2017 101-00000-220110 23040 201722 - Affordable Storage PUD - June 2017 1,320.30 07/25/2017 101-00000-220110 23041 June 2017 - Technical Assistance - Meetings 150.00 07/25/2017 101-41910-431990 Reference ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: True AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/19/2017 - 2:43 PM) Page 12 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number 8,631.88 Check Total: Vendor: 1775 NORTHWESTERN POWER EQUIPMENT CO 170298TE 07/25/2017 Well #2 Clay Valve parts- CSC swing ck; valve; 425.66 Check Total: Vendor: 4368 OFFICE DEPOT INC 942310227001 25 pk Menu pouch; 25 pk laminating pouch; (2) 101-43110-421990 69.46 Check Total: Vendor: 1412 OMANN BROTHERS INC 12787 1,792.00 (28) AC Fines mix 12798 1,792.00 (28) AC Fines mix 12804 641.28 (10.02) AC Fines mix 12812 128.64 (2.01) AC Fines mix 12820 288.98 (6.18) SPWEA240A 12833 64.64 (1.01) AC Fines mix 101-43120-422400 4,707.54 Check Total: Vendor: 1421 PARK SUPPLY OF AMERICA INC 218721200 19.84 Plumbing Items: Brass Closet Spud (1); Flanged 226-45126-422990 19.84 Check Total: Vendor: 1273 PAUSTIS & SONS WINE CO 8595817 1,556.99 resale - wine 8595817 20.00 freight 609-49750-433300 1,576.99 Check Total: Vendor: 1427 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS CO 2192011 1,858.54 resale - liquor 2192011 12.24 freight 2192753 71.04 freight 2192753 5,517.30 resale - liquor 2194614 908.37 resale - wine 2194614 46.60 resale - liquor 2194614 19.44 freight 2194615 17.28 freight 2194615 955.50 resale - liquor Amount Payment Date Acct Number 8,631.88 Check Sequence: 70 425.66 07/25/2017 601-49440-440600 425.66 Check Sequence: 71 69.46 07/25/2017 101-43110-421990 69.46 Check Sequence: 72 1,792.00 07/25/2017 101-43120-422400 1,792.00 07/25/2017 101-43120-422400 641.28 07/25/2017 101-43120-422400 128.64 07/25/2017 101-43120-422400 288.98 07/25/2017 101-43120-422400 64.64 07/25/2017 101-43120-422400 4,707.54 Check Sequence: 73 19.84 07/25/2017 226-45126-422990 19.84 Check Sequence: 74 1,556.99 07/25/2017 609-49750-425300 20.00 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 1,576.99 Check Sequence: 75 1,858.54 07/25/2017 609-49750-425100 12.24 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 71.04 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 5,517.30 07/25/2017 609-49750-425100 908.37 07/25/2017 609-49750-425300 46.60 07/25/2017 609-49750-425100 19.44 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 17.28 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 955.50 07/25/2017 609-49750-425100 Reference ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/19/2017 - 2:43 PM) Page 13 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number 2194616 resale - condiments 214.68 07/25/2017 609-49750-425500 2194616 freight 5.76 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 2195621 freight 30.60 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 2195621 resale - liquor 2,954.45 07/25/2017 609-49750-425100 2195622 resale - wine 1,185.75 07/25/2017 609-49750-425300 2195622 freight 24.48 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 2196498 freight 10.31 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 2196498 resale - liquor 847.20 07/25/2017 609-49750-425100 2196499 freight 34.56 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 2196499 resale - wine 1,303.46 07/25/2017 609-49750-425300 2196499 resale - mix 64.00 07/25/2017 609-49750-425400 2198019 resale - liquor 742.93 07/25/2017 609-49750-425100 2198019 freight 0.48 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 2198453 resale - liquor 8,386.92 07/25/2017 609-49750-425100 2198453 freight 137.53 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 268522 resale - liquor credit inv. #2140127 -7.69 07/25/2017 609-49750-425100 268523 resale - liquor credit inv. #2191256 -183.05 07/25/2017 609-49750-425100 268523 freight credit inv. #2191256 -0.60 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 269046 resale - liquor credit inv. #2194616 -58.80 07/25/2017 609-49750-425100 269046 freight credit inv. #2194616 -1.44 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 Check Total: 25,097.84 Vendor: 4741 AMANDA PRODOEHL Check Sequence: 76 7/12/2017 Reimburse for F.I. Supplies 47.34 07/25/2017 226-45127-421981 Check Total: 47.34 Vendor: 1450 RAILROAD MANAGEMENT CO III LLC Check Sequence: 77 351296 License Fees - Sewer Piipeline Crossing 10/16/1 194.55 07/25/2017 602-49490-431990 351303 License Fees 194.55 07/25/2017 263-49200-431990 Check Total: 389.10 Vendor: 4739 RATWIK, ROSZAK & MALONEY, P.A. Check Sequence: 78 60768 Professional Employment Services 5,281.91 07/25/2017 101-41800-430400 Check Total: 5,281.91 Vendor: 4022 REINHART FOODSERVICE LLC Check Sequence: 79 833933 Food for Concession - Resale 318.37 07/25/2017 226-45125-425410 841520 Food for Concession Resale 396.90 07/25/2017 226-45125-425410 841520 Food for Parry 16.39 07/25/2017 226-45127-421460 841520 Food for Block Party 1,167.99 07/25/2017 101-45130-444210 Reference ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/19/2017 - 2:43 PM) Page 14 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 841520 Food for Friendship Island 254.91 07/25/2017 226-45127-421990 Check Total: 2,154.56 Vendor: 4744 RJ MECHANICAL Check Sequence: 80 ACH Enabled: False 6/23/17 refund Refund Water Use Permit- Deposit $650-$518.6: 131.38 07/25/2017 601-49440-371120 Check Total: 131.38 Vendor: 4705 S2 SERVICES INC Check Sequence: 81 ACH Enabled: False MN -0169 EnduraGlaze - Mens & Childcare Restrooms 2,422.50 07/25/2017 226-45126-431990 Check Total: 2,422.50 Vendor: 1474 PATRICIAA SALZWEDEL Check Sequence: 82 ACH Enabled: True 7/6/2017 Mileage Reimbursement - June (280 miles) 149.80 07/25/2017 101-42700-433100 July 2nd Semi Monthly Contract Payment 1,593.75 07/25/2017 101-42700-431200 Check Total: 1,743.55 Vendor: 3827 SAMBATEK INC Check Sequence: 83 ACH Enabled: True 10023 Code Updates - Project Admin Services thru 6/2, 33.75 07/25/2017 101-41910-431990 Check Total: 33.75 Vendor: 2443 SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA INC Check Sequence: 84 ACH Enabled: False W5699272 6/24/17 - Security (5 hrs) 140.00 07/25/2017 226-45123-431992 W5709381 7/1/17 - Security (5 hrs) 140.00 07/25/2017 226-45123-431992 Check Total: 280.00 Vendor: 1484 SENSUS USA INC Check Sequence: 85 ACH Enabled: True ZA17022233 software support renewal 9/23/2017-9/22/2018 1,715.95 07/25/2017 601-49440-431900 Check Total: 1,715.95 Vendor: 1490 CYNTHIA R SIMPSON Check Sequence: 86 ACH Enabled: False 965209 July 2017 cleaning service - Fire Dept. 100.00 07/25/2017 101-42200-431990 Check Total: 100.00 Vendor: 1903 LINDA SMITH Check Sequence: 87 ACH Enabled: False TIF 1-20 Pay As You Go - 1st 2017 Principal 638.00 07/25/2017 213-46520-465110 TIF 1-20 Pay As You Go - 1st 2017 Interest 3,310.35 07/25/2017 213-46520-465110 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/19/2017 - 2:43 PM) Page 15 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Check Total: 3,948.35 Vendor: 3309 SOUTHERN GLAZER'S WINE AND SPIRITS. Check Sequence: 88 ACH Enabled: False 1537640 resale - wine 1,240.00 07/25/2017 609-49750-425300 1564191 resale - liquor 1,689.02 07/25/2017 609-49750-425100 1564191 freight 17.97 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 1564192 freight 13.54 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 1564192 resale - wine 628.08 07/25/2017 609-49750-425300 1566852 resale - wine 337.50 07/25/2017 609-49750-425300 1566852 resale - liquor 1,342.95 07/25/2017 609-49750-425100 1566852 freight 22.99 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 1566853 resale - wine 1,430.48 07/25/2017 609-49750-425300 1566853 freight 20.42 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 credits 7/10/17 resale - liquor credits -772.23 07/25/2017 609-49750-425100 credits 7/10/17 resale - wine credits -666.75 07/25/2017 609-49750-425300 credits 7/10/17 freight credits -7.00 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 Check Total: 5,296.97 Vendor: 3594 STRATEGIC EQUIPMENT, LLC Check Sequence: 89 ACH Enabled: False 2898631 asst. bags; hand soap; multi -fold towels; canlinct 196.26 07/25/2017 609-49754-421990 Check Total: 196.26 Vendor: 1518 TDS TELECOM Check Sequence: 90 ACH Enabled: True 763-271-3257 TDS 96.58 07/25/2017 702-00000-432100 763-295-2005 TDS 19.51 07/25/2017 702-00000-432100 763-295-3714 TDS 340.46 07/25/2017 702-00000-432100 Check Total: 456.55 Vendor: 4656 TRUE FABRICATIONS, INC. Check Sequence: 91 ACH Enabled: False 241119 resale - wine packaging items- twine; boxes; etc 187.46 07/25/2017 609-49750-425400 241119 frieght- wine packaging items- twine; boxes; etc 28.13 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 241224 resale - misc. gift bags; bottle stoppers; etc 346.32 07/25/2017 609-49750-425400 241224 labels 25.99 07/25/2017 609-49754-421990 Check Total: 587.90 Vendor: 1544 US POSTAL SERVICE Check Sequence: 92 ACH Enabled: False 7/11/2017 PI 42 - UB June Billing (3,785 pcs) (1/2) 857.31 07/25/2017 601-49440-432200 7/11/2017 PI 42 - UB June Billing (3,785 pcs) (1/2) 857.30 07/25/2017 602-49490-432200 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/19/2017 - 2:43 PM) Page 16 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number 1,714.61 Reference Check Total: Vendor: 1552 VIKING COCA COLA BOTTLING CO 1975120 resale - soda pop 1981438 resale - soda pop Vendor: 1567 Check Total: Vendor: 1684 VINOCOPIA 0183786 resale - liquor 0183786 resale - wine 0183786 freight 0184390 resale - liquor 0184390 resale - wine 0184390 resale - wine Amount Payment Date Acct Number 1,714.61 Reference Check Total: Vendor: 1561 WATER LABORATORIES INC 6270 June 2017 Water Testing 42460 Check Total: Vendor: 1567 WES OLSON ELECTRIC LLC 8292 Well #2- Solenoid Porblem- troubleshoot 8300 Labor - Mississippi Room Lighting 8300 Materials - Mississippi Room Lighting - Transfr 8320 Chelsea Lift Sta.- Trblshoot found bad Transforn Amount Payment Date Acct Number 1,714.61 Reference Check Total: Vendor: 1572 THE WINE COMPANY 42460 resale - wine 42460 freight 519.00 Check Total: Vendor: 1573 WINE MERCHANTS INC 7140460 resale - wine 7140460 freight Check Total: Vendor: 2645 WRIGHT CO AUDITOR-TREAS Amount Payment Date Acct Number 1,714.61 Reference AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/19/2017 - 2:43 PM) Page 17 Check Sequence: 93 ACH Enabled: True 622.75 07/25/2017 609-49750-425400 519.00 07/25/2017 609-49750-425400 1,141.75 Check Sequence: 94 ACH Enabled: True 199.92 07/25/2017 609-49750-425100 224.00 07/25/2017 609-49750-425300 10.00 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 74.00 07/25/2017 609-49750-425100 296.00 07/25/2017 609-49750-425300 4.00 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 807.92 Check Sequence: 95 ACH Enabled: False 240.00 07/25/2017 601-49440-422740 240.00 Check Sequence: 96 ACH Enabled: False 72.00 07/25/2017 601-49440-440600 396.00 07/25/2017 226-45126-431990 65.00 07/25/2017 226-45126-431990 72.00 07/25/2017 601-49440-440600 605.00 Check Sequence: 97 ACH Enabled: True 722.67 07/25/2017 609-49750-425300 8.25 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 730.92 Check Sequence: 98 ACH Enabled: False 1,718.74 07/25/2017 609-49750-425300 31.68 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 1,750.42 Check Sequence: 99 ACH Enabled: False AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/19/2017 - 2:43 PM) Page 17 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 7/7/2017 PID 155-062-001010 2nd Half Payment Proj #2S 45.22 07/25/2017 300-00000-361010 7/7/2017 PID 155-062-001010 2nd Half Payment Proj #2S 4.97 07/25/2017 300-00000-361020 Check Total: 50.19 Vendor: 1577 WRIGHT CO AUDITOR-TREAS - ACH Check Sequence: 100 ACH Enabled: True 7/12/2017 Court Fines & Fees for June 2017 3,527.71 07/25/2017 101-42100-430410 July July 2017 Deputies Contract 101,470.00 07/25/2017 101-42100-430500 Check Total: 104,997.71 Vendor: 1584 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC Check Sequence: 101 ACH Enabled: True 010148-000 1 201716 - Red Rooster Properties Plan Review - 456.00 07/25/2017 101-00000-220110 010266-000 1 201721 - Crown Bay Retail - May 2017 51.00 07/25/2017 101-00000-220110 01494-700 46 General WWTP -May 2017 5,411.25 07/25/2017 602-49480-430300 01494-800 41 100009 - CSAH 75/TH 25 Intersection Improves 468.00 07/25/2017 400-43300-430300 01494-950 33 14C002 - Phosphorus Construction Phase 4 - M 682.00 07/25/2017 602-00000-165010 01627-680 16 16D002 - Mills Fleet Farm Plan Review- May 2 2,552.00 07/25/2017 101-00000-220110 02596-010 29 General Engineering Services - Project Mgmt - - 240.00 07/25/2017 101-43111-430300 02596-010 29 General Engineering Services - Phase 5 - May 2 2,660.00 07/25/2017 101-43111-430300 02596-010 29 General Engineering Services - Phase 5 - May 2 2,660.00 07/25/2017 601-49440-430300 02596-010 29 General Engineering Services - Phase 5 - May 2 2,660.00 07/25/2017 602-49490-430300 02596-030 20 Maps - May 2017 488.00 07/25/2017 101-43111-430300 02596-040 23 GIS Support Services - May 2017 427.00 07/25/2017 702-00000-431990 02596-100 24 15C001 - 2016 Street Reconstruction Project - I 3,690.50 07/25/2017 400-43300-459011 02596-160 17 15C004 - 7th Street/TH 25 Intersection Improver 45,389.00 07/25/2017 400-43300-459014 02596-1907 ZVERIZ - Verizon Water Tower Plan Review -1\ 152.00 07/25/2017 101-00000-220110 02596-2507 16D003 - School District PUD Plan Reivew 621.00 07/25/2017 101-00000-220110 02596-2805 201638 - IRT Plan Review 608.00 07/25/2017 101-00000-220110 02596-2905 Monticello Business Center Drainage Study - M 2,156.00 07/25/2017 263-49200-431990 02596-3305 16D004 - Warnert/Sherbume Bank Plan Review 228.00 07/25/2017 101-00000-220110 02596-3408 2016 - 2017 Market Matching - May 2017 700.00 07/25/2017 213-46301-431990 02596-3506 17D001 - Camping World Plan Review - May Z 456.00 07/25/2017 101-00000-220110 02596-3608 16C003 - 2017 Street Improvements - May 201' 5,940.50 07/25/2017 400-43300-459016 02596-3903 201706 - Monticello Specialty Clinic - May 201' 1,604.00 07/25/2017 101-00000-220110 02596-4005 16C006 - Fallon Ave Improvements - May 2017 75,425.16 07/25/2017 400-43300-459018 02596-4203 201710 - Spaeth Plan Review - May 2017 3,232.00 07/25/2017 101-00000-220110 R010149-000 1 201720 - Autumn Ridge 3rd Addition Replat - n 306.00 07/25/2017 101-00000-220110 R010150-000 1 201715 - CentraCare Health Plan Review - May 380.00 07/25/2017 101-00000-220110 Check Total: 159,643.41 Vendor: 1585 XCEL ENERGY Check Sequence: 102 ACH Enabled: False AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/19/2017 - 2:43 PM) Page 18 Invoice No Description 553870434 Contract #1562630 Well 2 Adv. Payment Requi Check Total: Total for Check Run: Total of Number of Checks: Amount Payment Date Acct Number 12,887.38 07/25/2017 601-00000-165010 12,887.38 660,509.14 102 The preceding list of bills payables was reviewed and approved for payment. Date: 7/24/17 Approved by: Mayor Brian Stumpf Reference AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/19/2017 - 2:43 PM) Page 19 City Council Agenda 7/24/17 2B. Consideration of approving new hires and departures for Citv departments (TE) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The Council is asked to ratify the hiring and departures of employees that have occurred recently in the departments listed. It is recommended that the Council officially ratify the hiring/departure of all listed employees including part-time and seasonal workers. By ratifying departures, the council also approves the expenditure for final amounts due to terminated and otherwise departing employees. Al. Budget Impact: (positions are generally included in budget) A2. Staff Work Load Impact: If new positions, there may be some training involved. If terminated positions, existing staff would pick up those hours, as needed, until replaced. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to ratify the hire/departures of the employees as identified on the attached list. 2. Motion to deny the recommended hires and departures. C. RECOMMENDATION: By statute the City Council has the authority to approve all hires/departures. City staff recommends Alternative #1, for the Council to approve the hires and/or departures as listed. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • List of new/terminated employees NEW EMPLOYEES Name Title Department Hire Date Kara Ziemer Clerk Liquor Store 7/11/2017 PT Branden Lemke Clerk Liquor Store 7/14/2017 PT Nashelly Gomez Slide Attendant MCC 7/18/2017 PT Isabella Ward Guest Service 2 MCC 7/18/2017 PT Jayden Wistrom Climbing Wall MCC 7/18/2017 PT Name Noah Thompsen Nora Kowalke Involuntary Involuntary TERMINATING EMPLOYEES Reason New Hire and Terms City Council 2017.xlsx: 7/18/2017 Department MCC MCC Last Day 7/7/17 PT 7/11/17 PT Class Class City Council Agenda 07/24/2017 2C. Consideration of approving the sale or disposal of surplus Citv property (WO) There is no report this City Council cycle. City Council Agenda: 07/24/17 2D. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2017-40 accepting donations for the Farmer's Market, Summer Movie in the Park, and 2017 Mississippi Rampage Tournament for total of $1,095 (JS) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The Council is being asked to approve the donations/sponsorships for the Farmer's Market, the Summer Movie in the Park series, and the 2017 Mississippi Rampage Tournament. Sponsors of the Farmer's Market are Stephanie Ellingson and Allina Health System/Buffalo Hospital Foundation. The sponsors for the movie are Camping World and All Elements. North Risk Partners/Apollo Insurance is a Grand Slam level sponsor of the 2017 Mississippi Rampage Tournament. As required by state statute, if the City accepts the donation of funds, the City Council needs to adopt a resolution specifying the amount of the donation and its use. Al. Budget Impact: The donation/sponsorship will pay for expenses of the run or movie programming. A2. Staff Workload Impact: Staff participates in the events. Our sponsors will be recognized in all our advertisement and banners. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to adopt the Resolution approving the contribution and authorize use of funds as specified. 2. Motion to not approve the contribution and return the funds to the donors. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommendation is to adopt the resolution accepting the contributions. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • Resolution 2017-40 City of Monticello RESOLUTION NO. 2017-40 RESOLUTION APPROVING CONTRIBUTIONS WHEREAS, the City of Monticello is generally authorized to accept contributions of real and personal property pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Sections 465.03 and 465.04 for the benefit of its citizens and is specifically authorized to maintain such property for the benefit of its citizens in accordance with the terms prescribed by the donor. Said gifts may be limited under provisions of MN Statutes Section 471.895. WHEREAS, the following persons and or entities have offered to contribute contributions or gifts to the City as listed: DONOR/ENTITY Stephanie Ellington Allina Health System/Buffalo Hospital Foundation North Risk Partners/Apollo Insurance Camping World All Elements Inc. DESCRIPTION VALUE Cash $75 Cash $225 Cash $200 Cash $297.50 Cash $297.50 WHEREAS, all said contributions are intended to aid the City in establishing facilities, operations or programs within the city's jurisdiction either alone or in cooperation with others, as allowed by law; and WHEREAS, the City Council hereby finds that it is appropriate to accept the contributions offered. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Monticello: 1. The contributions described above are hereby accepted by the City of Monticello. 2. The contributions described above will be used as designated by the donor. This may entail reimbursing or allocating the money to another entity that will utilize the funds for the following stated purpose: DONOR/ENTITY PURPOSE/AMOUNT Stephanie Ellingson $75/Monticello Farmer's Market Allina Health System/Buffalo Hospital $225/Monticello Farmer's Market Foundation North Risk Partners/Apollo Insurance $200/2017 Mississippi Rampage Tournament Camping World $297.50/Movie in the Park All Elements Inc. $297.50/Movie in the Park Adopted by the City Council of Monticello this 24th day of July, 2017. Brian Stumpf, Mayor ATTEST: Jennifer Schreiber, City Clerk City Council Agenda: 7/24/17 2E. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2017-44 approving the issuance of general obligation bonds, series 2017A (WO) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The attached resolution authorizes the mayor and city administrator to approve the sale of $5,000,000 in bonds with a true interest cost not to exceed 3.5%. The bond issue proceeds will finance improvements related to the 2017 street reconstruction and utility projects throughout the city and Fallon Avenue overpass. The city has passed reimbursement resolutions for expenditures made in advance of the debt issuance. Further, the city is issuing debt to cash flow engineering and other street reconstruction costs until the next bond issue --anticipated for 2018. Debt service payments will be made with a mix of property taxes and a special assessment. The first interest payment is due June 15, 2018 and the first principal (plus interest) payment is due December 15, 2018. The 2018 draft budget includes debt service on this issue. Total annual debt service is estimated at $480,000 for the 2017 bonds. This debt issue maximizes the $5 million small -issuer exception for debt issued by the city in 2017. The small -issuer exception allows the city avoid costly future arbitrage rebate calculations associated with spend down requirement timelines. The city has secured the services of a pricing opinion provider to assess the competiveness of this negotiated bond sale. The approximate $2,000 cost of this service will be rolled into the bond issue. Al. Budget Impact: Detailed above. A2. Staff Workload Impact: Internal coordination of issuance - otherwise little to no impact on the staff. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS Motion to adopt Resolution 2017-44 approving the issuance of general obligation street reconstruction and improvement bonds, series 2017A. Motion to deny Resolution 2017-44 approving the issuance of general obligation street reconstruction and improvement bonds, series 2017A. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The City staff supports Alternative #1. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Resolution 2017-44 B. Debt Calendar CERTIFICATION OF MINUTES RELATING TO GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS, SERIES 2017A ISSUER: City of Monticello, Minnesota BODY: City Council KIND, DATE, TIME AND PLACE OF MEETING: A regular meeting held on Monday, July 24, 2017, at 6:30 p.m., in the City Offices MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT: Documents Attached: Extract of Minutes of said meeting. RESOLUTION 2017-44 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ISSUANCE OF GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS, SERIES 2017A I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting recording officer of the public corporation issuing the obligations referred to in the title of this certificate, certify that the documents attached hereto, as described above, have been carefully compared with the original records of said corporation in my legal custody, from which they have been transcribed; that said documents are a correct and complete transcript of the minutes of a meeting of the governing body of said corporation, and correct and complete copies of all resolutions and other actions taken and of all documents approved by the governing body at said meeting, so far as they relate to said obligations; and that said meeting was duly held by the governing body at the time and place and was attended throughout by the members indicated above, pursuant to call and notice of such meeting given as required by law. WITNESS MY HAND officially as such recording officer on July 24, 2017. City Clerk EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO, STATE OF MINNESOTA HELD: Monday, July 24, 2017 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Monticello, State of Minnesota, was duly held on Monday, July 24, 2017 at 6:30 p.m. Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ISSUANCE OF GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS, SERIES 2017A BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota (herein, the "City"), as follows: The City Council hereby finds and declares that it is necessary and expedient for the City to sell and issue its fully registered general obligation bonds in the total aggregate principal amount not to exceed $5,000,000 (herein, the "Bonds"). The proceeds of the Bonds will be used to finance infrastructure improvements and associated street improvements and the costs of issuing the Bonds. 2. The City Council desires to proceed with the sale of the Bonds by direct negotiation with Northland Securities, Inc. (herein, "NSI"). NSI will purchase the Bonds in an arm's- length commercial transaction with the City. 3. The Mayor and City Administrator are hereby authorized to approve the sale of the Bonds in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $5,000,000 and to execute a bond purchase agreement for the purchase of the Bonds with NSI, provided the true interest cost is less than 3.50%. 4. Upon approval of the sale of the Bonds by the Mayor and the City Administrator, the City Council will take action at its next regularly scheduled or special meeting thereafter to adopt the necessary approving resolutions as prepared by the City's bond counsel. 5. NSI is authorized to prepare an Official Statement related to the sale of the Bonds. 6. If the Mayor and the City Administrator have not approved the sale of the bonds to NSI and executed the related bond purchase agreement by December 31, 2017, this resolution shall expire. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS, SERIES 2017A PROPOSED SCHEDULE OF EVENTS The following checklist of items denotes each milestone activity as well as the members of the finance team who will have the responsibility to complete it. Please note this proposed timetable assumes regularly scheduled City Council meetings. june2017 Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat July 201 7 Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Mon Tue Wed 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 29 30 31 August 2017 28 29 30 Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Authorizing Resolution Adopted - 6:30 p.m. City Council Action, 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 July 201 7 Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat mtember 2fi Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 26 27 28 29 30 mtember 2fi Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Tax Abatement Approval Hearing City Council Action July 17th Trigger Resolution Sent to City for Council Packets Northland, Bond 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Date Action Responsible Party May 22 Call Public Hearing for Tax Abatement City Council Action May 27 -June 15th Publication of Notice of Public Hearing on Tax City Abatement June 26th Tax Abatement Approval Hearing City Council Action July 17th Trigger Resolution Sent to City for Council Packets Northland, Bond Finance Plan Sent to the City Counsel July 241h Trigger Resolution for Bonds Adopted City Council Action, Northland, Bond Counsel August 17th Preliminary Official Statement Sent to City for Sign Off Northland, City and to Rating Agency Week of August Rating Conference Call Northland, City, 28th Rating Agency September 14th Rating Received Rating Agency, City, Northland September 21St Bond Pricing Northland, City Bond Purchase Contract Signed September 25th Authorizing Resolution Adopted - 6:30 p.m. City Council Action, Northland, Bond Counsel October 24th Closing on the Bonds (Proceeds available) Northland, City Staff, Bond Counsel NORTHLAND ,-%r, SECURITIES 2F. City Council Agenda — 7/24/17 Consideration to approve an amendment to a Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development, and Development Stage PUD Review of a multi -tenant commercial building in a B-3, Highwav Business District. Applicant: Larson, Andv/Crown Bav (NAC) Property: 110 Chelsea Road Lot 6, Block 1, Monticello Travel Center 2nd Addition Planning Case Number: 2017-021 A. REFERENCE & BACKGROUND Request(s): Deadline for Decision: Land Use Designation: Zoning Designation: Current Site Use: Surrounding Land Uses: North: East: South: West: Project Description. Amendment to a Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development and Development Stage PUD approval that would accommodate the development of a 4,942 square foot multiple tenant retail building in the B-3 District. August 4th, 2017 Places to Shop (Comprehensive Plan) B-3, Highway Business District Vacant Mixed Use — Convenience Retail/Motor Fuel Commercial Lodging Multi -tenant Commercial Retail Convenience Retail/Motor Fuel PUD Development Stage - Site Plan Review Proposed Use. The applicants propose a mix of commercial tenants, including retail sales and services as allowed by the B-3 Zoning District, with the specific request that commercial office uses (allowed by Conditional Use Permit in the B-3) would be included in the initial approval. Commercial and professional office uses are compatible City Council Agenda — 7/24/17 with the proposed B-3 retail activities, and are present in other parts of the Travel Center complex. Parking requirements are similar, and no conflicts are foreseen. For other potential tenants, the applicants will be required to comply with the City's change of use permitting as tenants change over time, to ensure zoning compliance and compatibility. PUD Flexibilitv. The project proposes to utilize PUD flexibility to accommodate the need for cross -parking and access with adjacent uses, and potentially, for signage identification (discussed further below). Lot Size. The B-3 District provides for no specific minimum lot size, but requires a minimum lot width of 100 feet on a public street. The subject property is .75 acres in area, 32,723 square feet. The parcel has approximately 114 feet of frontage on Oakwood Drive, and 136 feet of frontage on Cedar Street. Site and Building Data. The proposed building is about 4,942 square feet in size. The applicants indicate that after development, about 87% of the lot area will covered with building or pavement, leaving 13% pervious green space. The site layout relies on access from a common driveway shared with the Holiday Station to the west with access from Oakwood Drive, and another common driveway shared with the retail center to the south, with access from Cedar Street. A service drive would also provide access from Cedar Street for delivery vehicles. The applicants show a trash enclosure adjacent to the south wall of the building with access from the south driveway. Parking bays are arrayed along the north and west side of the building, utilizing the west driveway access. Off -Street Parking. Parking supply for the site is proposed at 28 parking spaces. The requirement for commercial retail use is one space per 200 square feet, resulting in a parking standard of a minimum of 25 spaces. The site complies with this standard, provided no eating establishments are tenants of the facility. Because the facility is included in a shared/cross parking arrangement with the retail portion of the Travel Center to the south, the applicants could potentially request a future amendment that includes an eating establishment where parking supply could be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. As such, changes to the tenant mix that propose eating establishments would require a change of use permit, and possibly a PUD amendment. Landscaping. A variety of planting have been proposed on the site, including plantings along the perimeter of the site, within off-street parking areas and around the perimeter of the building. In regard to site landscaping, the following comments are offered. Caliper Inch Requirements. According to the Ordinance, 10 caliper inches (ACI) of tree planting (including at least one evergreen) must be provided for each acre of site area, plus 2 shrubs per 10 feet of building perimeter. Thus, the landscaping W City Council Agenda — 7/24/17 requirement for the .75 acre site would be 8 caliper inches of trees, and a total of 58 shrubs for the 288 feet of building perimeter. The landscaping plan shows 17.5 caliper inches of trees, plus one evergreen tree, along with 49 shrubs and 9 additional perennial grasses, meeting the requirement. Ground Cover. As noted, about 13% of the site is green space, including the planting areas with rock mulch, and lawn grass. The applicants have not noted whether the landscaped areas will be irrigated, although that would be recommended, given the materials and small areas. Buffer Yards. No bufferyards are required with all adjoining property zoned and guided for commercial uses. Building Size, Finish Materials. The proposed building is 90 feet in length by 54 feet in depth, with 2-3 separate retail tenant bays shown on the preliminary floor plan. The building elevations show a stepped parapet -edged building wall height of up to 28 feet (although the drawings appear to scale to 24 feet). Building materials include rock -faced concrete block along the base, below dominant glass windows on the front (north), as well as the west and east sides. The windows are divided by brick veneer pillars, with the upper portions of the fagade covered with stucco -finish EIFS. Primary entrances also include horizontal awnings. All materials are consistent with the requirements of the zoning ordinance for commercial structures. The south face (service side) of the building is rock -faced concrete block, with EIFS along the upper parapet. The drawings show that the trash enclosure will be constructed of matching block. Trash/Recvclin2. As noted, the applicant has proposed a trash handling enclosure adjacent to the south wall of the building which would be accessed from the driveway separating the proposed building and the adjacent retail building. Whtim A separate site lighting plan is included in the plan set. Building elevations indicate wall -mounted lighting on the brick pillars, and the site plan shows three 20 foot tall poles around the site to light the parking lot. The photometric shows compliance with the code requirements for light intensity at the perimeter. The applicants should verify that the light fixtures will be hooded or directed to cast light downward, and will not glare on adjacent property or the public streets. The lighting plan appears to be compliant with the applicable codes. Sianaae. Wall signs are proposed on all four walls of the building identifying the tenants. Based on 15% of the building walls facing the two streets, the applicants are permitted up to 465 square feet of wall signage. The plans show this amount. The applicants also City Council Agenda — 7/24/17 propose a monument sign near the main entrance from Oakwood Drive. For such signs, the code allows up to 100 square feet of sign area. The proposed plans identify this standard in a note, but the illustrated sign is approximately 46 square feet in area, and just under 10 feet in height. The plans show a rock -faced block base matching the building materials. The developer may choose to construct a compliant sign up to 100 square feet by sign permit at a later date without a PUD modification. In addition, under the original Planned Unit Development approval for this development, the adjoining property owner to the south retains a private easement right and approval to construct a 57 -foot tall pylon sign in the southeast corner of the site. The applicant has suggested that they may attempt to negotiate the termination of this easement in exchange for other Travel Center identification on the proposed monument sign. This would be consistent with the intent of the PUD treatment of the site. Grading and Utilities. The submitted grading and utility plans should be subject to review comment by the City Engineer. Planning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission reviewed this item and held a public hearing on the amendment to CUP and Development Stage PUD on July 11th, 2017. Property owner Robert Lamont addressed the Commission regarding the proposed project. The Commission confirmed with Mr. Lamont that no drive-through facilities are proposed for the current project. Mr. Lamont confirmed that there are no drive-throughs proposed. Adjacent property owner Dan Mielke also addressed the Commission regarding the item. Mr. Mielke noted that there are existing cross easements within the original PUD which run with the land and govern the north/south and east/west access through the site and PUD. Mr. Lamont confirmed the easement for access remains in place. After discussion, the Planning Commission recommended unanimously to approve the amendment to Conditional Use Permit. Final Stage PUD Application Following the City Council's decision on the Development Stage PUD, the applicant will be required to submit a Final Stage PUD application and plans meeting all conditions Development Stage approval. The Final Stage PUD will then be considered by the City Council. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS 2 City Council Agenda — 7/24/17 The Planning Commission unanimously recommends Alternative #1 below for Development Stage PUD. 1. Motion to approve an amendment to Conditional Use Permit for Development PUD, based on the findings in Resolution No. PC -2017-017, and contingent on compliance with the conditions listed in Exhibit Z. 2. Motion to deny an amendment to Conditional Use Permit for Development and PUD, based on findings identified by the City Council 3. Motion to table action. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends Alternative 1, approval of the CUP/PUD. The project is, with only minor notes, fully compliant with the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance for B-3 development. Moreover, it is consistent with the initial expectations of the original PUD approvals granted in 2005. D. SUPPORTING DATA A. Resolution PC -2017-017 B. Subject Site Aerial Image C. Applicant Narrative D. Applicant Plan Submittal, including: a. Title Sheet b. Certificate of Survey C. General Notes & Specifications d. Standard Details e. Grading Plan f. SWPPP g. Paving Plan h. Landscaping Plan i. Site Plan and Floor Plan j. Elevations k. Site Photometric Plan 1. Stormwater & Drainage Calculations, digital only E. City Engineer's Letter, dated 7/5/17 Z. Conditions of Approval 5 City Council Agenda — 7/24/17 EXHIBIT Z Conditional Use Permit/Planned Unit Development And PUD Development Stage Site Plan Review Lot 6, Block 1, Monticello Travel Center Conditions of Approval 1. Proposed Tenants include those listed in the B-3 District as Permitted Uses, in addition to commercial and/or professional office space (a Conditional Use in the B-3 District). 2. The applicants complete Change of Use process requirements as tenants change to verify continued compliance with zoning requirements. 3. Verification of executed cross -parking and access agreements within the Travel Center PUD. 4. Verification that lighting fixtures meet the requirements of the zoning ordinance as specified in this report. 5. Compliance with comments from the City Engineer in the Engineer's letter dated June 5th, 2017. 6. Payment of required development charges and submission of required landscaping security. 7. Other comments of the Planning Commission and Staff provided at the Public Hearing. Con CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2017-017 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A DEVELOPMENT STAGE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR CROWN BAY, LLC LOT 6, BLOCK 1, MONTICELLO TRAVEL CENTER 2nd ADDITION WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted a request to develop its property along Oakwood Drive and Cedar Street, Lot 6, Block 1, Monticello Travel Center 2nd Addition; and WHEREAS, the applicant concurrently proposes to develop the property for commercial uses; and WHEREAS, the site is guided for commercial uses under the label "Places to Shop" in the City's Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the proposed PUD, is consistent with the long-term use and development of the property for commercial uses; and WHEREAS, the proposed project is consistent with the original intent for the Monticello Travel Center; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on July 11, 2017 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: 1. The PUD provides an appropriate means of furthering the intent of the Comprehensive Plan for the site by constructing a proposed building for commercial use. 2. The proposed improvements on the site under the Development Stage PUD are consistent with the needs of the PUD in this location as a commercial area. 3. The improvements will have expected impacts on public services, including sewer, water, stormwater treatment, and traffic which have been planned to serve the property for the development as proposed. 4.. The PUD flexibility for the project, including parcels with cross access and parking, as well as joint signage, are consistent with the intent of the City's CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2017-017 economic development objectives, as well as with the intent of the original approved PUD plans. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, that the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the Monticello City Council approves the Development Stage PUD, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit Z as follows: 1. Proposed Tenants include those listed in the B-3 District as Permitted Uses, in addition to commercial and/or professional office space (a Conditional Use in the B- 3 District). 2. The applicants complete Change of Use process requirements as tenants change to verify continued compliance with zoning requirements. 3. Verification of executed cross -parking and access agreements within the Travel Center PUD. 4. Verification that lighting fixtures meet the requirements of the zoning ordinance as specified in this report. 5. Compliance with comments from the City Engineer in the Engineer's letter dated June 5th, 2017. 6. Payment of required development charges and submission of required landscaping security. 7. Other comments of the Planning Commission and Staff provided at the Public Hearing. ADOPTED this 11th day of July, 2016, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. ATTEST: MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION LO -5 K Brad Fyle, Chair CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2017-017 Angela Schumann, Community Development Director Larson Building, Inc. -Request for Amdt. to Conditional Use Permit for Devel. Stage PUD Created by: City of Monticello Lot 6, Block 1 Monticello Travel Center 2nd Addition 1155-202-001060 & 155-202-001061 June 5, 2017 To: Community Development Director, City of Monticello, MN To Whom It May Concern: Crown Bay LLC, fee title property owner of Lot 6, Block 1, Monticello Travel Center 2nd Addition, petitions on behalf of Crown Bay LLC, for a CUP/PUD Development Stage Amendment. A CUP for a development stage PUD was previously granted by order on November 28th, 2005. It allowed for a drive-in convenience food establishment, motor fuel station/convenience store, car wash, joint parking and drives, open and outdoor storage and a retail commercial development on Lots 6 and 7, Block 1, Monticello Travel Center 2nd Addition. Lot 7 was developed, Lot 6 was not. This petition seeks to revitalize with amendment the earlier granted CUP/PUD for Lot 6. Though there are changes to the commercial development of Lot 6, such as building type, building design, and site layout, it still fully meets the criteria required to grant a CUP as set out by City code. Numerous site constraints have been overcome, limiting the request for PUD flexibility to one instance; a setback encroachment at the southeast building corner. The proposed 4,942 sq.ft. retail/commercial building is located in an existing 133- Highway Business zoning district and has two to three tenant spaces serving primarily "permitted" B3 uses. One possible exception is the "conditional" B3 use - office. Office use allowance exists in the adjoining development and is specifically requested in this petition. Any other conditional use will be by separate application. The excess on-site parking and the seven additional owner/tenant parking spaces available in the south Holiday lot gives flexibility for uses requiring additional parking. No tenants are secured at this time. Construction will begin in September or October 2017. Certain City Development Fees apply to the PUD (including those for SAC, WAC, Trunk Sanitary and Trunk Water). Submittal documents establish that CUP Approval criteria are met or exceeded. The proposed use is consistent with surrounding uses. The building's 3 -front design, material use, limited size and site placement complements and enhances the current and future adjoining development types and property values. The building is specifically sized and located to maintain visibility to the neighboring building to the south. (Jimmy John's). Future area development will likely consist of the same type of uses. The use provides improvement to the health, safety and welfare of persons, replacing the detrimental issues of the now vacant parcel with code -compliant features_ Existing utilities and roads are of current design; able to accommodate the use. The use meets or exceeds City code requirements. The use will not result in any nuisance nor impact natural features. The use adheres to criteria of Chapter 5 of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance. Thank You. Robert LaMont, Chief Manager, Crown Bay, LLC CROWN BAY RETAIL BUILDING PUD DEVELOPMENT STAGE PLAN - JUNE 5, 2017 Atti0 Mini 8 nrage Rr SU Alrrience u •r r r� e r 1 } R IMMN. ✓ R y� ti •, : Y. V CID!! r - 1 Jimmy John's ,R staurants ` • �f a AERIAL ,; 110 OAKWOOD AVE E 14 MONTICELLO, MN 55362 4 YSt nticello Country Club WB A� 7Monticello olf Course Rd GaffCourse Rd Gat Course Ry%6w3,d�fY�3 0 Monticello a �' aCammomtyeemer i 4 £E 7v 41 0 Moon Motoreport6 m CibFaod,il Si" YlY yt � v o 994 O�systatianst9res A 2�vndas Rd DuW.d Rd Dundas Rd u nde°Rd 0 0 s ReA River.. Entre eQ mead Dr o v' Aoo ichaeis m 3 AFI rl ng&Deeign R m �� -,gee shddla,dm� MAP DRAWING INDEX T1 TITLE SHEET SH 1 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY CIVIL C1 GENERAL NOTES & SPECIFICATIONS C2 STANDARD DETAILS C3 GRADING PLAN C4 SWPPP — NOTES C5 SWPPP — STANDARD DETAILS C6 SWPPP — PLAN VIEW C7 PAVING PLAN CL1 LANDSCAPE PLAN ARCHITECTURAL Al SITE PLAN & FLOOR PLAN A2 ELEVATIONS ELECTRICAL E1.1 SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN CONTACTS OWNER CROWN BAY LLC 2435 BARTON AVE NW BUFFALO, MN 55313 P H . 763.682.3790 CONTACT. ROBERT LAMONT GENERAL CONTRACTOR LARSON BUILDING, INC. 200 1ST STREET SOUTH BUFFALO, MN 55313 P H . 763.688.5430 CONTACT. ANDY LARSON ARCHITECT STONE TENT ARCHITECTURE 15001 140TH ST FORESTON, MN 56330 PH. 612.508.8099 CONTACT. ERIK JOHNSON CIVIL SCHULTZ ENGINEERING & SITE DESIGN 18 SOUTH RIVERSIDE AVENUE SUITE 230 SARTELL, MN 56377 P H . 320.339.0669 CONTACT. BRIAN SCHULTZ ARCHITECTURE © 2017 STONE TENT ARCHITECTURE, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED This drawing is an instrument of service and is the sole property of Stone Tent Architecture, any use of this drawing without written consent by Stone Tent Architecture is prohibited. The architect shall not have control or charge of and shall not be responsible for construction means, methods, deviations, techniques, sequences or procedures, or for safety precautions and programs in connection with the work, for the acts or omissions of the contractor, subcontractors or any other persons performing any of the work, or for the failure of any of them to carry out the work in accordance with the contract documents. Always use dimensions as shown. Drawings are not to be scaled. Drawing scales as indicated are for reference only and are not intended to accurately depict actual or designed conditions. Written dimensions shall govern. 15001 140th st foreston, mn 56330 ph. 612.508.8099 erik@stonetentarchitecture.com stonetentarchitecture.com 11 CARSON BUILDf NG No. Date Appr Revision Notes 1 6/5/17 ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL 2 6/20/17 REVISED SUBMITTAL z O No. Date Issue Notes U I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision (� and that I am a duly Licensed Z Architect under the laws of the State O of Minnesota. U Signature O H O ZArchitect Erik P. Johnson T / \� /� Registration L1 J 0 50962 Date 0 JUNE 5, 2017 z Project Title CROWN BAY w RETAIL BUILDING C� Q Project ID 1020 z w Sheet Title J TITLE SHEET Ill / Sheet No. w Q D LEGEND • Found Iron Monument A Found Mag Nail ® Found Chiseled X O Set Iron Monument #41226 ID Water Gate Valve 1711 Sign ® Storm Sewer Manhole ❑ Pedestal ® Curb Stop 0 Light Pole � Fire Hydrant ❑ Catch Basin 0 Sanitary Sewer Manhole X Spot Elevation A Set Mag Nail UTILITY PIPE LEGEND (Pipe Size Type) Denotes "per city plans or record drawing" Existing Storm Sewer Existing Sanitary Sewer w Existing Watermain Electric Transformer--- 959.0 (Flow Line) At 375 SPRUCE AVENUE NORTH IIIII.- WEBB P.O. BOX 323 SURVEYING LLC MAPLE LAKE, MN 55358 1 763-898-9999 959.9 111 Sanitary Sewer Manhole -- RIM = 956.28 CER TIFICA TE OF S UR VE Y Catch Basin ,---Concrete Curb RIM = 955.90 .---Storm Sewer Manhole 956.0 RIM = 955.78 �r 956.1 r\ Coo 956.7 r\ Hefei \ \ 956.8 s�ao J a \� 956.8 Storm Sewer Manholer-- \J 00 RIM = 956.19 a \J 956.8 956.8 17, T_ ---Benchmark \ ' 1 ; / f (See Note 2) 956.7 \ \ 956.0 J \ r \ ' -' 957.2 \ \ 56.2 \ J \ J 956.6 \ ;' Concrete Curb \ J \ \° J \ 67.0' 956.6 956.9 \ I \ 956.1 C \ / r 000~e 956.3 Catch Basin \ r \ 56.2(Flow Line) 111, r Holiday Gas Station Sign RIM = 956.00 INV = 953.07 956.N Seo \ i� r 0, \ / kf n / 56.1 \ \ I \J X 56.5 r \J 957.3 70 etes�ae 6.6 G6y ti�1 r, 956.4 _ 5u6 I \J Sanitary Sewer Manhole Edge of Concrete--, oroC 956.7 O r Q \ \J RIM = 957.26 J C X., QG2� C1O1 /� r INV NW,SE = 942.26 �L n /dray -.,956.2 \ 57.1 956.6 \ \ \\ INV S = 944.26 Concrete Curb (6612) u5 \ 56.8 \ro , \ % 957.6 %��tum �. •• Storm wer b r V AJ �; .91 (15 HD r \ X956.3 / �, .,,6 , 957.6 I J \J !y 957.2 y►e�n ` tch Basin- \' \ cc 957.2 RIM = 9566 90 �8�5�� O `` INV =X53.25 Q ', O \ S 1 °0509 \ 956.8 i i 1 57.4 -7 957.2 i X 0.42 \ i� i J X 1 X 3/ \ 2�� \ oc957.5 �t v 957.5 �g 95 Vii /' ` \ ° O / X Oma\ �Sljo fest ^ \ \J \ r, i���` b� /� �, X i ID 958.4 6 S` V ao I J ❑ pQ O i •, C 7 957.2 t 6'. r \ U" -Concrete urb 6618 J and �sement 6� V A ;' ) \ 957.3 0 �7 i3 / ��' j perplat� �� V V J G° .' L56 957.1 / ^ J u ( Y ` \ \ •�. ••••'• /� �\ I 56.9 r \ 957.5 57.7 n /, / X958.7 F r / \' \� 9a. \ \ I sr \ o Lea�zn--' X Q 957.7 �� y 957.9 i ��X958.2 / 59.0 �, \. X958.7 \ r p� Catch Basin / X,_ / �, / u',. I\ 57.0(Flow Line) 957.9 / %� / \ `` \F`' • - Telephone RIM = 957.31 >( 958.6 ui�• ' •• p ^ \ \ 57.2 ` RIM Storm 957.61 Sewer Manhole <- 7.4 CO 958.3 �� 1 30' Front Setback- �� \9�'•. Manhole \ r < 958.0 ' / dge of Bitumi per Alta Survey X y INV 951.73 / / 957.6 nous ,� X \ ( ' I --Catch Basin Edge of Gravel/Dirt = 958.8 < � /' 9 / 959.2 \ UndQro�nd as pe s\. `' RIM = 957.43 958.9 J( gop qr one ma X ` ---Underground Fi er Optic a 957.9 a i X958.5 -1856 _ - - - I 9�58.� / per gopher on marks r 957.5 o r 10' Setback ` 958.8 ( \ Drainarid ljtility Easement ^ 957.3 _ _ er plat X ^ 958.2 / L - - - - Gravel/Dirt Area 20' Side Setback ....... I : X I 57.5 r i ¢-- per Alta Survey 585t \�� i O I I 958 6 /' r'r )( Drainage and Utility Easement vacated -----• -••,;, 1 I ti ? /� 959.2 �b "' Catch asin rr / 959.3 ® per City Resolution No. 2017-15 / �� h� X RIM 957.43 r 958. r / .,/ I 958 INV - 954.08 X 957.8 X959.2! C �/ X958.8 957.6 ^ r Storm Sewer Manhole r�58.3 / 959.9 n; / // )59.2 / roGirO 59.7 �� X LOT 6 �i Bituminous ce Imo: :� TDS Teleco 57 g - f RIM = 958.07 X �Ia �: Duct per go her �° J INV NE = 952.24 r _ one mark iI •0 i / ^ VN\V \ SW W=952.31Underground Electric Edge of Bitumino per gopher one marks wo �///958.5 096 ^�` 9589Line V \ r 6 Ir�tric Sin 960.4 �� _ _ ` _ _ - _ _ _ _ - / �° 8S6- - - �/V o ` / rf g X a�� \ \ /j Edge of Gravel/Dirt-' 960.5 / •� 958.5 X \ , )"-storm Sewer Manhole Q / 958.9 ', 99 Conc�te Curb (B618)--' .1 _ ��. 959. r � � X _ '\XI � I ,-c ,.,. I •,. X °� / 958.3 / v���• � RIM = 957.95 Bituminou Curb 960.3 X X9.0- 1 r 1 1 1 1 ; 1 \� ♦ o " %' ^ G 958. T 960.7 '\ - /' -1 _- T`/-1 T t 1`� T 11h: 1, N2.3�7 /• 1J°' (~r= ��i^��\��1 1 r ` x961.2\/ \•,, 9601X /'�; 9 7 ?9.. 959.2'` 1 ter- `/ r 96 °--Underground Telephone "�I / IM: I ^) �� 1 X 961.1 1 per gopher one marks li/ �: ^ QX 961.1 961.2 / / -I / I;�: \ I 8. X \ ReaSeitSack - - _ J ^ \ �� %� Z. 959.7 X960.5 I 959.5 per Alta Survey 960.3 - X X959.9 X / 960.0 I i h * I 58.4 960.0 \ ... Drainageand UtilityEasement \����� 960.6 960.8 / / \\ X9597/ O 9Q0. ` per plat 959.5 \ X � / S 83%21'22"� \ I \ ' I ' ` iyn Easement per Doc N%.,'(157614 / /19.69 E \ 960.0 959.3 59.8 60.226.10 X / / X j ro / 958 / ¢� 959.0 15.00 ! 957. X( 7 : lb<n ° 58.5 $ %o \ \� 957.1 O i A. 60.5 ?3'�2„ \ 4 Us Roaaw \ %! /x'5.3 G 958.8 ,,, \ X 2°3 ' W: • F' ay \ �,` /, 3 ' X9 6 - 'G 958.9 Par 14j-�t \ `� t. \� f i / X 960.4 kih8 43.096 Edge fB1turn no+�X\ / d e o •• ms`s ;• :Stalls : ' ; ' � � \ � ,••Water Service 959.8 959.6 �'�, ; � N 62°38'15"�W 10.10' "--' �^ per city plans � , 960.2 , ✓ rn 1 ; I958 8 Z, X c ^ , 56 8 59 � \ 1 / 59.6 ,,.. c° '-N.62° 8'15" W 21.50' '1_ _ - I 960.1 / 58 8 i r j t If' N62�\-- N 27%23'54" ; 13.09,; ' Electric � I �_- ` 8'7S,\ er _____________s N 26° 8" E ^ Sanitary Sewer F Trans former 959.6 /� $ s2a38, 11r4 j 8°7 I / / I city ty marks Service r rt9gUitan X 59.1 9 Underground Electric - 58.8 9 4 V° I / I 958.7 Concrete Curb---' per gopher one>.�arks / R•8 97 ^ / I •c 24" Surmountable Curb-- 9 .Q \\ Q• X Sanitary Sewer Manhole -- / a 58'9 ® RIM = 959.62-- 959 2 'Edge o W %> > �> 59.0(Flow Line) / Concrete Curb- -I / (6618)/X959.3 // I �/ 958.9 / / 1 / 1 / Sanitary Sewer Manhole RIM = 959.41 ^ / INV N = 945.11 I ,---Catch Basin RIM = 958.95 /Catch Basin - RIM = 958.97 Storm Sewer Manhole--:� RIM = 959.41 ` RCpJ Storm Sewer Manhole INV = 953.24 / RIM = 959.16 CLIENT: Andy Larson Larson Building, Inc. 3 Hwy 55 West Buffalo, MN 55313 PROJECT LOCATION: 110 Oakwood Ave E Monticello, MN 55362 PID NI 155202001060 & 155202001061 ch Basin I = 957.61 I hereby certify that this survey, plan, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. C�` f"- `•UJB' Date: 01/31/17 Charles E. Webb, Jr. License No. 41226 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: Lot 6 and 7, Block 1, MONTICELLO TRAVEL CENTER SECOND ADDITION, Wright County, Minnesota. NOTES: 1) The legal description as shown hereon was obtained from Title Commitment File No. NCS-808341-MPLS issued by as a proform by First American Title Insurance Company . The review and depiction of any easements other than the platted easements and sign easement was not within the scope of this survey. 2) Benchmark: Top nut of fire hydrant located on the northeasterly side of Oakwood Drive East as shown hereon. Elevation= 959.37 feet (NGVD 1988 datum) 3) Area: 32723 SgFt 0.8 Acres 4) Location of utilities existing on or serving the surveyed property as determined by observed evidence and markings by utility companies and other appropriate sources (are shown hereon), subject to the following restrictions: A. Utility operations do not consistently respond to locate requests through the Gopher State One Call service for boundary purposes such as this. B. EXTREME CAUTION MUST BE EXERCISED BEFORE AN EXCAVATION TAKES PLACE ON OR NEAR THIS SITE. BEFORE DIGGING, YOU ARE REQUIRED BY LAW TO NOTIFY GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE AT (651) 454-0002. C. The exact location of underground features cannot be accurately depicted without excavation or "potholing". D. Per Gopher State One -Call Ticket No. 170300505, the following utilities and municipalities were notified: TDS TELECOM 763-295-2301 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 800-778-9140 CITY OF MONTICELLO/FIBERNET 763-314-0113 CENTER POINT ENERGY 608-223-2014 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 651-366-5750 NORTHERN NATURAL GAS 651-674-4488 TDS METROCOM 218-821-7672 XCEL ENERGY 800-848-7558 A Drawn by: TTH REVISIONS Checked by: CEW Jr. INO. DATE BY DESCRIPTION 1 05/08/17 TTH Added City Resolution I I I I 19zefflgro etelur3a]=rl1z11bi SHEET: 1 OF 1 STANDARDS AND REFERENCES Materials and construction methods specified in the plans reference the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MNDOT) Standard Specifications for Construction. The Contractor shall obtain a current copy of MNDOT's Standard Specifications for Construction and review the specification sections applicable to the plans. It is mandatory that the Contractor be knowledgable of the applicable MNDOT specification sections during construction. No additional compensation will be paid to the Contractor for additional work due to unfamiliarity with the applicable specification sections. Contractor shall refer to the geotechnical report for additional requirements and recommendations. EARTHWORK NOTES PROTECTION 1) The Contractor shall maintain all benchmarks, monuments and other reference points. If any are disturbed or destroyed, they shall be replaced at the Contractor's expense. 2). The Contractor shall contact the Engineer immediately if any unknown functioning underground utilities are discovered during the course of the project, which may interfere with construction. The Contractor shall wait for instructions before proceeding. 3) The Contractor shall be responsible for any damage to functioning underground or overhead utility lines. Damaged utilities shall be repaired immediately and service restored at no additional cost to the Owner. 4) The Contractor shall provide barricades, shoring and other safety measures required by OSHA. 5) The Contractor shall protect all adjacent existing facilities from damage, including, but not limited to settlement due to excavations, erosion, etc. The Contractor shall be responsible for the repair of such damages. PROJECT CONDITIONS 1) The Contractor shall become familiar with the project site, and compare actual conditions in the field with those shown on the project drawings. The Contractor shall contact the Engineer immediately if any inconsistencies are found between the existing conditions and the project drawings. 2) No extra compensation will be allowed due to unusual conditions which could have reasonably been determined or anticipated by examination of the project site and project drawings. PLAN GRADES 1) Elevations shown on the project drawings are finished grade elevations, unless noted otherwise. Elevations not specifically indicated shall be determined by interpolation of uniform slope between spot elevations and/or contours, or between such points and existing elevations. Adequate slope shall be constructed to provide positive drainage away from structures. 2) If inconsistencies exist on the plans between contours and spot elevations, the spot elevations shall govern. TOPSOIL 1) Adequate imported and/or stockpiled salvageable topsoil shall be utilized for this project. 2) Topsoil shall be free of clay lumps, roots, brush, large stones, and debris, and shall have a minimum organic content of 5 percent. 3) Remove topsoil to its entire depth from areas, which are to be disturbed by new construction work. Existing lawn areas, which are not in the proposed construction area (s) shall remain in place. The Contractor shall field verify topsoil depths between any soil borings, and remove to greater depths than indicated in the soils report if such conditions are encountered. Salvaged topsoil shall be maintained in stockpiles. 4) Stockpiled topsoil shall only be used for finish grading of new lawn areas. Excess topsoil shall be removed from the site by the Contractor. 5) Protect all existing lawn areas, plantings, and other landscaping to remain in place. Any damaged areas shall be replaced at the Contractor's expense. UNFORESEEN OBSTACLES 1) The Engineer shall be contacted immediately if any unforeseen major obstacles are encountered during excavation, such as abandoned wells, abandoned or functioning utilities, subsurface streams or rock, etc., which would add significant expense to the Contractor. 2) The Contractor shall still be responsible for completing all work required for this project where encountered conditions may be reasonably determined from a soils/geotechnical report and review of the project site and contract documents. DEWATERING 1) Surface drainage shall be provided during construction in a manner so as not to create a nuisance to adjacent areas. 2) All excavations shall be free of water during construction within the excavations. Dewatering shall be accomplished by pumping or trenching, and shall be conducted regardless of the cause, source, or nature of the water. 3) Berms, cofferdams, or piling shall be provided as necessary to protect excavations. 4) Excavations shall be sloped to drain, and necessary pumps, hoses and other equipment shall be provided to keep excavation free of water. 5) All temporary equipment used for dewatering shall be removed from the site when no longer necessary. FILLING AND GRADING 1) Rough grading of all areas within the construction limits, including adjacent transition areas shall be reasonably smooth and compacted. The rough graded subgrade surface generally shall not be more than 6 inches above or below the established subgrade elevations. All ditches, swales, and gutters shall be graded to drain adequately. The subgrade shall be evenly sloped to provide drainage away from building walls in all directions at a minimum slope of 1 %. The Contractor shall provide rounded transitions at top and bottom of banks and other breaks in grade. 2) Fill and backfill materials shall be inorganic soils free of roots, rocks, boulders, and debris. 3) Bedding material or granular backfill larger than 2" in its largest dimension shall not be allowed within 2 feet of new underground pipes. Material larger than 3" in its largest dimension shall not be allowed within 1 foot of subgrade elevation. 4) Imported compacted fill material shall have a maximum of 12 percent passing the #200 sieve, by weight. The proposed fill material shall be tested by an independent testing lab for suitability as compacted fill for this project. The Contractor shall pay for the testing services and provide a copy of the test results to the Engineer. 5) The Contractor shall fill and grade as necessary to bring surface to required elevations, and provide all materials necessary, whether obtained on or off the project site. 6) The Contractor shall place compacted material in uniform horizontal lifts not exceeding 8" in depth for clay soils, and 12" in depth for sandy soils, and compact as required to achieve specified density. 7) Compaction shall be obtained with the use of vibratory rollers or rammers. During compaction, fill material shall contain moisture content, as necessary, for the required compaction as indicated by an independent testing laboratory. The moisture shall be uniform throughout each lift. If the material is too dry, water shall be added with approved equipment and methods, which will not wash out fine material. If the material is too wet, it shall be dried by harrowing, disking, blading, or other approved methods recommended by the independent testing laboratory. 8) Areas designated for pavement in excavated (cut) areas shall be scarified to a depth of 1 foot. The Contractor shall bring the subgrade material to optimum moisture content as indicated by the independent testing laboratory, and compact the subgrade to the specified density listed below for soils underneath pavements. 9) The Contractor shall not place fill material when either the fill material, or the material on which it is to be placed, is frozen. Any soft or yielding areas appearing in the fill resulting from frost, rain, or any other reason whatsoever shall be scarified, removed, recompacted and/or otherwise rectified to the satisfaction of the Engineer before any new fill is placed. COMPACTION TESTS 1) Utility Trench Backfill: The Contractor's independent soils technician and approved testing laboratory shall perform in-place density and moisture tests at random depths in trench backfill at 100 foot intervals, or fraction thereof. Compaction of trenches shall be a minimum of 95% of the maximum dry density (as determined by the independent testing laboratory) in lawn areas, and at depths greater than 3 feet below areas designated for pavement. Compaction of trenches at depths within 3 feet of paved surfaces shall be a minimum of 100% of the maximum dry density. 2) Compacted Fill Under Pavements: Compaction tests shall not be required beneath new pavements. Adequate compaction of materials under pavements shall be determined by test rolling the subgrade, and checking for excessive rutting. Test rolling shall be performed as per MNDOT Spec. 2111. 3) Areas exhibiting a failed compaction test shall be re -compacted and re -m tested to the satisfaction of the Engineer prior to acceptance of the project. 4) Copies of all compaction testing and test roll observation reports shall be provided to the Engineer. 5) Optimum moisture -density relationship will be determined by testing laboratory in accordance with ASTM D698 and maximum density determination made by Method D of ASTM D698 unless otherwise noted in these specifications. SUBGRADE PREPARATION 1) Finished subgrade elevations shall be as follows: a) Bituminous pavement: 9" below finish grade. b) Concrete sidewalk: 8" below finish grade (plus thickened edge). c) Lawn areas: 4" below finish grade. d) Planting areas: See Landscaping Plans/Details 2) The tolerance for areas to be paved shall not exceed 0.15 feet above or below plan subgrade. 3) The Contractor shall protect newly graded areas from erosion. Settlement or washing that occurs prior to acceptance of the Work shall be repaired and grades re-established. DISPOSAL OF EXCESS WASTE MATERIALS 1) The Contractor shall remove excess excavated material, debris, and waste materials, from the Owner's property and legally dispose of it in accordance with all governing codes. SPREADING TOPSOIL AND FINISH GRADING 1) Scarify subgrade to depth of 3" prior to placing topsoil. Spread topsoil evenly over complete subgrade as follows: a) Lawn Areas on Private Property: Spread 4" lightly compacted layer of topsoil. b) Lawn Areas in Public Right-of-way: Per City requirements c) Planting Areas: See Landscape Plan/Details 2) Finish grade accurately within 0.15 feet of finish grades shown on the project drawings, less the thickness of any sod where it is to be installed. Slope all grades away from buildings to provide positive drainage. 3) Prepare topsoil suitable to receive seed and/or sod. Grading of areas designated for topsoil shall be reasonably smooth and even, and in accordance with MNDOT Spec. 2105.3G and 2574.3A4. All debris and stones exceeding 3" in diameter shall be removed from the soil surface of these areas prior to seeding. Areas compacted by vehicles or storage of materials shall be plowed, disked and harrowed to match texture of other finish graded areas. 4) Grass seed shall be in accordance with MnDOT Spec. 3876, seed mix No. 25-131, applied at the rate of 220 pounds per acre or as indicated on the landscape plans. Mulch shall be applied and discanchored to all seeded areas and shall meet the requirements of MnDOT Spec. 3882, Type 3 or as otherwise indicated by the Engineer. UTILITY NOTES STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS 1) The following standard specifications shall apply to this project: a) Minnesota Plumbing Code - MN Rules Chapter 4714 (MN Dept. of Labor and Industry-MNDLI) b) Uniform Plumbing Code, latest edition (UPC) c) "What you need to know about utility service connections in the 2015 Minnesota Plumbing Code" http://www.dli.mn.gov/CCLD/PDF/pe_usc.pdf d) City Engineers Association of Minnesota (CEAM) Standard Specifications e) American Society for Testing Materials (ASTM) f) American National Standards Institute (ANSI) g) American Water Works Association (AWWA) h) Minnesota Department of Transportation "Standard Specifications for Construction" (MN/DOT) 2) The Contractor shall comply with all local ordinances and codes 3) Certifications of all utility materials, as well as shop drawings, shall be submitted to the Engineer for review POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC) PIPE AND FITTINGS - SANITARY 1) Smooth walled polyvinyl chloride pipe and fittings shall consist of SDR 26 or SDR 35 pipe, unless noted otherwise, and meet the requirements of ASTM D3034 and Section 2621.2A5 of the CEAM Standard Specifications 2) All pipe and fittings shall be SDR 35 for depths of up to 20 feet, and SDR 26 for depths exceeding 20'. 3) Pipe joints shall meet the requirements of Section 2621.3A3 of the CEAM Standard Specifications. DUCTILE IRON (DIP) PIPE AND FITTINGS - WATER 1) Ductile iron pipe and fittings shall meet the requirements of Table 604.1 of the UPC, and Section 2611.2A1 of the CEAM Standard Specifications 2) Pipe joints shall meet the requirements of Section 605.5 of the UPC, and Section 2611.3B of the CEAM Standard Specifications. Stainless steel fasteners shall be prohibited. 3) 6" pipe shall be Class 52. 8" and larger pipe shall be Class 50. POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (C900 PVC) PIPE AND FITTINGS - WATER 1) Polyvinyl chloride pressure pipe and fittings shall meet the requirements of Table 604.1 of the UPC, and Section 2611.2A3 of the CEAM Standard Specifications 2) Pipe joints shall meet the requirements of Section 605.4 of the UPC, and Section 2611.3B of the CEAM Standard Specifications. GATE VALVES - WATER 1) Gate valves shall meet the requirements of Sections 2611.2C and 2611.3D of the CEAM Standard Specifications HYDRANTS - WATER 1) Hydrants shall meet the requirements of Sections 2611.2B and 2611.3D of the CEAM Standard Specifications 2) Hydrants shall be Waterous WB67, or approved equal BLOCKING AND ANCHORING - WATER 1) Water main blocking and anchoring shall meet the requirements of Section 2611.3A4 of the CEAM Standard Specifications 2) Provide thrust reaction blocking consisting of concrete with a minimum 28 day compressive strength of 2000 psi. 3) Place between undisturbed ground and the fitting to be anchored. Place thrust blocking so that the pipe and fitting joints are accessible for repair. 4) Mega -Lugs may be used in lieu of thrust block if allowed by local utility. WATER SERVICE PIPE AND CURB STOPS 1) Copper tubing for water services shall meet the requirements of Table 604.1 of the UPC, and Section 2611.2D of the CEAM Standard Specifications 2) HDPE pressure pipe for water services shall meet the requirements of ASTM D2239, ASTM D2737, ASTM D3035, AWWA C901, CSA B137.1, and Section 2611.21D of the CEAM Standard Specifications 3) Curb stops for water services Section 2611.2D of the CEAM Standard Specifications HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE PIPE (HDPE) AND FITTINGS - STORM 1) HDPE pipe and fittings shall meet the requirements of ASTM F2306, and Section 2621.2A8 of the CEAM Standard Specifications 2) Pipe joints shall meet the requirements Section 2621.3A3 of the CEAM Standard Specifications 3) Minimum wall thickness shall be 0.035 inches for 12 and 15 inch diameter pipe, and shall be 0.05 inches for 18 and 24 inch diameter pipe. 4) HDPE storm sewer crossing above and within 10 -ft of existing or proposed water main or services shall meet the following standards per the MN plumbing code: 4"- 10" Diameter: AASHTO M252 12" - 60" Diameter: ASTM F2306 Fittings: ASTM D3212 REINFORCED CONCRETE SEWER PIPE (RCP) AND FITTINGS - STORM 1) RCP pipe and fittings shall meet the requirements of ASTM C76, and Section 2621.2A3 of the CEAM Standard Specifications 2) Pipe joints shall meet the requirements of Section 2621.3A3 of the CEAM Standard Specifications 3) The ASTM strength class of pipe shall be Class III unless otherwise shown on the Plans. 4) The pipe shall be drawn together by some approved method of jacking or winching. This pressure must be maintained until sufficient backfill is placed to keep the joint from opening. END SECTIONS - STORM 1) End sections shall be provided at all pipe inlets and outlets. 2) The end sections shall consist of material matching the material of the pipe, which it is being connected to. Materials and joints shall be as per the specifications described above for the applicable pipe material. 3) The last 3 joints of RCP shall be tied, and the end section shall the be provided with an approved trash guard. MANHOLES AND CATCH BASINS - SANITARY AND STORM 1) Unless otherwise noted, manhole and catch basin structures shall consist of precast concrete, and meet the requirements of Section 719.6 of the UPC (sanitary only), and Sections 2621.2C and 2621.3D of the CEAM Standard Specifications 2) Catch basins shall be provided with the following castings: a) Along curbline: 27" Structure: Neenah R -3075-L, 48" (or larger) Structure: Neenah R -3067-L b) Isolated (in paved area): Neenah R-2553 c) Isolated (in vegetated area): Neenah R -2560 -EA w/ type "C" grate 3) Manholes shall be provided with the following castings: a) Sanitary: Neenah R-1733 w/ concealed pick hole b) Storm: Neenah R-1733 lettered "STORM", center pick hole INSTALLATION 1) Unless otherwise noted, installation of all water and sewer pipe, fittings, and appurtenances shall be as per the CEAM Standard Specifications. TESTING REQUIREMENTS 1) Water and sewer pipe, fittings, and appurtances shall be inspected and tested as per Sections 2611.3E -2611.3H and 2621,3F -2621.3H of the CEAM Standard Specifications. 2) In the event of discrepancies between the testing requirements of the MN Plumbing Code and the CEAM Standard Specifications, the most stringent will govern. BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT NOTES STANDARDS 1) Minnesota Standard Specifications for Highway Construction, most recent edition. GRANULAR BASE COURSE 1) Compacted thickness of finished base course: 6' 2) Process material for aggregate base shall meet the requirements of MNDOT Spec. 3138, Class 5.. 3) The subgrade shall be tested and observed to the satisfaction of the Engineer prior to placement of aggregate base material. Install base material as required to accommodate new plan grades. 4) Wet base material to approximate optimum moisture content either prior to delivery to job site or as soon as practical after being placed on subgrade. 5) Place in layers not exceeding 4" thickness (loose). 6) Compact with pneumatic or vibrating steel drum rollers. 7) After base course has been graded and compacted, thoroughly wet and slush roll with roller until all aggregates are thoroughly embedded. 8) Allow base course to cure for a minimum of 72 hours prior to bituminous course application. BITUMINOUS BASE AND SURFACE COURSE 1) Mix Designation Numbers for the bituminous mixtures on this project are per MNDOT Spec. 2360 2) Pavement smoothness requirements will be waived for this project. 3) Density for the bituminous mixture on this project will be the ordinary compaction method (MNDOT 2360.6C). 4) Bituminous Base course shall conform to MnDOT 2360, Type SPNWB330B and shall be 1J inches thick after compaction. Bituminous Surface course shall conform to MnDOT 2360, Type SPWEA340B and shall be 1J inches thick after compaction. 5) Place no asphaltic mixture when the atmospheric temperature is below 45 degrees and falling, nor should pavement be placed under wet conditions. 6) Mixing a) Paving mixture: Uniform mixture of course aggregate, fine aggregate, mineral filler and asphaltic material. b) Grading and mixing: Conform to applicable sections of the Minnesota Standard Specifications for Highway Construction, Section 2360. CONSTRUCTION METHODS 1) Properly clean base course and deliver hot mix asphaltic concrete in clean tight vehicles with covers if necessary. 2) Lay to a smooth surface without segregation of material and attain compaction as early as possible. Commence rolling while the material is hot, (minimum spread temperature 250 degrees F.) as soon as it will support the roller without undue displacement or hairline cracking and continue until a minimum of 96% of maximum has been attained, no further compression can be attained and all roller marks are eliminated. 3) The completed surface: Smooth, free of pockets that will retain water and shall not vary more than 1/16" per foot nor more than 1/4" under a 16' straight edge. Entire surface must drain. No flat areas are permitted. 4) Perform all Work in accordance with the applicable requirements of the Minnesota Standard Specifications for Highway Construction. PAINTED LINES 1) Special marking paint compound especially for striping bituminous paving in one coat. 2) Manufacturers: Pratt & Lambert, Inc.; Sherwin Williams Co. or DuPont Co. 3) Colors: Use white paint for concrete and asphalt. 4) All surfaces to be painted must be thoroughly clean and dry. 5) Lay out painted lines with chalk on pavement in accordance with Project Drawings. 6) Accurately apply paint to the chalk marks, using striping machines, 4" wide stripes. 7) Apply paint in strict accordance with the manufacturer's directions. 8) Protect all paint from damage by traffic until dry. 9) Apply handicap logo at handicap stall. FIELD QUALITY CONTROL 1) Aggregate Base Testing: a) The granular base course shall be test rolled and observed by the Contractor's independent soils technician as per MNDOT 2211.3C2 (Quality Compaction Method). Once the base course has been tested to the satisfaction of the Engineer, pavement may be placed. b) One mechanical analysis (ASTM D-422) per 500 cubic yards of base or fraction thereof. 2) Bituminous Testing: a) Test temperature of first truck. b) Ordinary compaction (MNDOT 2360.6C) CONCRETE PAVEMENT, CURB & GUTTER, AND SIDEWALK STANDARDS 1) ACI 318, ACI 315, CRSI, ACI 301, latest adoptions. 2) Minnesota Standard Specifications for Construction, most recent edition GRANULAR BASE COURSE MATERIAL 1) Compacted thickness of finished base: 6' - Concrete Pavement/Aprons 4" - Concrete Sidewalk 2) Base material shall consist of MNDOT 3149.262 Select Granular Borrow. AGGREGATES 1) Coarse: MnDOT Spec. 3137. 2) Fine: MnDOT Spec. 3126. WATER 1) Clean, fresh and potable, MnDOT Spec. 3906. AIR ENTRAINING ADMIXTURES 1) ASTM C260. 2) Provide entrainment of 4 - 7 percent by volume. PORTLAND CEMENT 1) ASTM C 150, Type I plus an approved air entraining agent, or Type IA air -entraining Portland cement. OTHER ADMIXTURES 1) MnDOT Spec. 3113. 2) Calcium Chloride or materials containing chlorides or nitrates shall not be allowed. PROPORTIONING AND DESIGN OF MIXES 1) MnDOT Spec. 2461.3 2) Concrete Classifications a) Curb and gutter, slip -formed concrete: 3A22 b) Sidewalk, aprons, incidental concrete, manual curb & gutter: 3A32 c) Concrete pavements or aprons: 3Y43 d) Repair concrete, fast strength concrete: 3Y43 3) Concrete Specifications: a) 3A22: 1-2" slump, 3900 psi, 4-7% air b) 3A32: 2-3" slump, 3900 psi, 4-7% air c) 3Y43: 3-4" slump, 4300 psi, 4-7% air d) Temperatures of all concrete during placement shall be 50 -deg F to 90 -deg F CONCRETE PLACEMENT 1) Place concrete as soon as possible after mixing. Place before initial set has occurred, and in no event after it has contained its water content for more than one hour. 2) Avoid overworking concrete or allowing concrete to fall unrestricted for excessive vertical distances, and other situations which can cause segregation of the aggregates. 3) Concrete pavements shall be placed in accordance with applicable portions of MnDOT 2301. 4) Sidewalks shall be placed in accordance with MnDOT 2521. 5) Curb and gutter shall be placed in accordance with MnDOT 2531. PROTECTION 1) Provide adequate protection against rain, sleet and snow before and during placement and finishing of concrete. 2) Protect concrete from premature drying. Provide temporary covering as required. Keep concrete continuously moist for 7 days. 3) Treat concrete with membrane curing compound in accordance with MnDOT 2531.3G. COLD WEATHER CONCRETE 1) Do not place concrete when the atmospheric temperature is below 40 degrees F., or when the concrete is likely to be subjected to freezing temperatures within 24 hours after it has been deposited unless adequate temporary heating is provided. 2) Maintain concrete temperature of 40 to 90 degrees F. for 3 days. Protect from freezing for the following 5 days. 3) No frozen materials may be used in the concrete. Chemicals may not be used to prevent freezing unless approved by the Engineer. 4) Perform all cold weather concreting in accord with ACI 306. HOT WEATHER CONCRETE 1) Do not place concrete when the atmospheric temperature is above 100 degrees F. 2) Maintain concrete temperature of 40 to 90 degrees F. for 3 days. Protect from temperatures over 90 degrees for the following 5 days. 3) Thoroughly wet dry porous surfaces before concreting. 4) Water reducing admixtures with retarding properties are required for all concrete placed when the temperature exceeds 80 degrees F. 5) Perform all hot weather concreting in accord with ACI 305. FINISHING 1) Provide a broomed finish on exterior sidewalks and ramps unless noted otherwise. QUALITY CONTROL 1) The Contractor shall hire an independent testing firm to provide the following tests: a) The independent testing technician shall perform random field testing of the fresh concrete including slump, air content, and temperature. (ASTM C143, C173, C231 and C138). One series of the aforementioned tests shall be performed on the first load of concrete. b) The independent testing technician shall cast a set of four compression test cylinders for the first load of concrete as well as 1 set for every 100 cubic yards, or fraction thereof, of concrete thereafter. Compression tests shall be performed on one test cylinder at 7 days and two test cylinders at 28 days. The fourth test cylinder shall be retained in the event of failing compression tests on the 28 -day test cylinders. GENERAL NOTES & SPECIFICATIONS Z 0Z D J02 Z O F - w U LU 0 cn U O N W U) O M J U c O O Z a N N N U U N N F 0 Q = N W F-- c/) Q F-- O N w0 U W O W J Ln(/ �C N (1) `t }- "- N O 0 00 w J 0 � QU W r/ o Z Q O O o0 Ln U O N? U 0 010 O 0 N Q CL N O m v (0 00 O Z or" i I N CY) CO > I..L Z (y) (0 c @) LLJ CD C f 2 w _ WQ_LLJ co CO N Z LL -c ' ^ v Q U O Z C W UJ N~ W Ax W 2 Q N V J N� > Z 1 -c O \ 0 N - \` O C0N � W W Z 0Z D J02 Z O F - w U LU 0 cn w J_ Z O o V) W F-- c/) Q F-- w0 LU O W Q Q:� Z N (1) `t V Z 0 J_ W F-- c/) Q F-- w0 LU W Q > Q Z ZZ Z 0 00 J 0 � QU W r/ Z U o0 3 PROJECT NUMBER: 17029 a) Q U7 O N O r - Cl OF 7 USE NEENAH R -1642—A FOR LOW PROFILE APPLICATIONS USE NEENAH R1755—G FOR WATERTIGHT APPLICATIONS LETTERING TO READ: SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER OR WATER MAIN WHICH EVER IS APPLICABLE. KIPP'MAH R-1642 WITH 3 SOLID LID JE BEARING OR CONCEALED PICKHOLES (2) " EAT OPPOSITE SI EXCEPT FOR LETTERI 25 3/4 " CONTRACTION AND EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL BEARIN SURFACE 7 TO BE MACHINED 2521.3C2 COVER 24- 28 1/2 " 36" FRAME I Isle: Standard Frame andard Plate Library and Cover City of Monticello 03-05 Date: Plate No. Revised: 1002 03-15 I I A D A CURB INLET FRAME AND CURB BOX O NEENAH NO. R -3067-V I I 4" CONCRETE COLLAR ADJUSTING RINGS 4" MIN - 12" MAX ENCASE IN CONCRETE COLLAR USE CONCRETE CURB MIX FOR COLLAR 35 1/4 43" ALL STORM SEWER CASTING ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THE PLANS HAVE BEEN DEPRESSED 0.10' BELOW GUTTER ELEVATION (SEE DETAIL 5003) i' '\ 24" k FINISH - GRADE 31" 2" 5" 3'- 6" 34" 4" MIN. 4" MIN. ' 4" CONCRETE COLLAR NOTES: SECTION A—A POUR A 3" TO 4" CONCRETE COLLAR AROUND RINGS EXTENDING FROM THE CASTING TO THE PRECAST SECTION CATCH BASINS LOCATED IN DRIVEWAYS SHALL BE TYPE MnDOT DESIGN H. THE CASTING SHALL BE NEENAH R -3508-A2. Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Title: Standard Catch Basin Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised: 0,3 -15 4002 0 TOP OF PROPOSED SUBGRADE rTHE TOP 3' SHALL BE COMPACTED AT A MIN OF 100% OF STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY (MN/DOT 2105) _�_A OF 2' LIFTS TO BE WETTED AND CONSOLIDATED BY VIBRATORY MEANS AND COMPACTED TO A MIN OF 95% OF STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY (MN/DOT 2105) 4' COVER COMPACTED TO 95% OF STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY WITHOUT THE USE OF HEAVY ROLLER EQUIPMENT GRANULAR BEDDING AS PER MN/DOT 3149.2F GRANULAR FOUNDATION WHERE ORDERED BY THE ENGINEER SHOVEL, PLACE, AND HAND COMPACT AROUND PIPE TO 12" ABOVE PIPE. VIBRATORY COMPACTION REQUIRED EACH SIDE OF PIPE, AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. Standard Plate Library City of Monticello I Isle: Typical Trench Compaction and Class B Bedding Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised: 03-15 1007 A 35-1/4" 43" / t i PLAN CASTING TO BE SET 0.10' CURB INLET FRAME AND CURB BOX BELOW GUTTER ELEVATION STANDARD CASTING - NEENAH R -3067-V ADJUSTING RINGS 4" MIN - 12" MAX ENCASE WITH CONCRETE MANHOLE COVER TO BE 48" DIA COLLAR 6" OP ENING TYPE II WITH 24"x 36" *15" 24" 9" CONCRETE DOGHOUSE REQUIRED ON OUTSIDE AND INSIDE OF STRUCTURE AND PIPE CONNECTION RCP PIPE CONCRETE CATCH BASIN MANHOLE J NOTES: AND BASE TO BE CRETEX TYPE 4338 OR APPROVED EQUAL 1. BASE TO BE GROUTED TO FORM A SMOOTH INVERT TO OUTLET. SECTION 2. PIPE CUT-OUTS TO BE LOCATED WHERE REQUIRED. CATCH BASIN MANHOLES REQUIRED IN GREEN SPACES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF PRECAST CONCRETE ONLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH Mn/DOT STANDARD PLATE 4006L. THE CASTING SHALL BE NEENAH R-4342. CATCH BASIN MANHOLES LOCATED IN DRIVEWAYS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH AN ECCENTRIC TOP SLAB WITH A 27" ROUND OPENING. THE CASTING SHALL BE NEENAH R -3508-A2. Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Title: Catch Basin Manhole Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised: 0,3 —15 4003 / -- TIES REQUIRED TO CLEAN OUTS USE 4" OR 6" CISP PLUG AND CAP, TOP TO BE 1/2 " BELOW FINISHED GRADE FINISHED GRADE [T 6" PVC RISER FOR NON—RESIDENTIAL 4" PVC RISER FOR RESIDENTIAL VARIES 10' TO 20' 4" OR 6" VERTICAL WYE (PVC) 1/8 BEND -- CONCRETE ENCASEMENT 12" ALL AROUND (INCIDENTAL) /// WATER TIGHT GASKET / OR CEMENTED PLUG iF PVC HORIZONTAL WYE (PVC) THRUST BLOCKING FOR CLEANING EQUIPMENT 1. PAYMENT FOR 6" RISER PIPE, 6" VERTICAL WYE 45' BEND AND PLUG WILL BE PAID FOR AT UNIT PRICE BID PER EACH. 2. CLEAN—OUTS REQUIRED AT 70' INTERVALS FROM MAIN SEWER LINE. Standard Plate Library for the City of Monticello BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SECTION O Title: Sanitary Clean -Out Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised: 3005 03--07 11" BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE (MNDOT 2360 TYPE SP W EA340B) TACK COAT BETWEEN BITUMINOUS COURSES 11" BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE (MNDOT 2360 TYPE SPNWB330B) 6" MNDOT CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE APPROVED COMPACTED SUBGRADE — PARKING LOT 4" CONCRETE (MNDOT CONCRETE MIX 3A32) 1" CHAMFER 6.. T �- 4" MNDOT 3149.282 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW CONTRACTION AND EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AS PER MNDOT SPEC. APPROVED COMPACTED 2521.3C2 SUBGRADE OTHICKENED EDGE SIDEWALK J, NOTES J' PER FT SLOPE 1. FOR AREAS WHERE DRAINAGE IS DIRECTED AWAY FROM THE CURB, THE GUTTER SHALL BE TILTED TO DRAIN FROM THE CURB CONCRETE 2. CONCRETE SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF 6' MNDOT CONCRETE MIX 3A22 3. MNDOT 8612 CURB AND GUTTER SHALL MEET THE 1 REQUIREMENTS OF STANDARD MNDOT PLATE 7100 Cl) • a' I� le .,a•..•a. .. •• ••� 1 _ _ 2" MIN. COMPACTED MNDOT III—III-1 I—I I—I I—I I—III CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE —1 I— -� I— III—I I III BELOW CURB AND GUTTER - III—I I 1- I I El I I-1 APPROVED COMPACTED `- 20" _ SUBGRADE 2 CURB & GUTTER (MNDOT B612) NTS NTS 4" CONCRETE (MNDOT CONCRETE MIX 3A32) • ; r 4" MNDOT 3149.282 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW I �—III—III—III—III—III—III—III—III—III—III—I I -1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 I M —I I—I I—I I I—I 11-1 11-1 11-1 I—I I —I III -1 11-1 11-1 I I=— 11 —III =1 1 II I II IIl i lII �- -I II II I II APPROVED COMPACTED SUBGRADE CONTRACTION AND EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AS PER MNDOT SPEC. w 2521.3C2 4 NTS CONCRETE SIDEWALK SECTION J w *48"(TYP) _ > U N c� *DIMENSION VARIES O N BASED ON STRUCTURE O U DIAMETER CONCRETE DOGHOUSE REQUIRED ON OUTSIDE AND INSIDE OF STRUCTURE AND PIPE CONNECTION RCP PIPE CONCRETE CATCH BASIN MANHOLE J NOTES: AND BASE TO BE CRETEX TYPE 4338 OR APPROVED EQUAL 1. BASE TO BE GROUTED TO FORM A SMOOTH INVERT TO OUTLET. SECTION 2. PIPE CUT-OUTS TO BE LOCATED WHERE REQUIRED. CATCH BASIN MANHOLES REQUIRED IN GREEN SPACES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF PRECAST CONCRETE ONLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH Mn/DOT STANDARD PLATE 4006L. THE CASTING SHALL BE NEENAH R-4342. CATCH BASIN MANHOLES LOCATED IN DRIVEWAYS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH AN ECCENTRIC TOP SLAB WITH A 27" ROUND OPENING. THE CASTING SHALL BE NEENAH R -3508-A2. Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Title: Catch Basin Manhole Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised: 0,3 —15 4003 / -- TIES REQUIRED TO CLEAN OUTS USE 4" OR 6" CISP PLUG AND CAP, TOP TO BE 1/2 " BELOW FINISHED GRADE FINISHED GRADE [T 6" PVC RISER FOR NON—RESIDENTIAL 4" PVC RISER FOR RESIDENTIAL VARIES 10' TO 20' 4" OR 6" VERTICAL WYE (PVC) 1/8 BEND -- CONCRETE ENCASEMENT 12" ALL AROUND (INCIDENTAL) /// WATER TIGHT GASKET / OR CEMENTED PLUG iF PVC HORIZONTAL WYE (PVC) THRUST BLOCKING FOR CLEANING EQUIPMENT 1. PAYMENT FOR 6" RISER PIPE, 6" VERTICAL WYE 45' BEND AND PLUG WILL BE PAID FOR AT UNIT PRICE BID PER EACH. 2. CLEAN—OUTS REQUIRED AT 70' INTERVALS FROM MAIN SEWER LINE. Standard Plate Library for the City of Monticello BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SECTION O Title: Sanitary Clean -Out Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised: 3005 03--07 11" BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE (MNDOT 2360 TYPE SP W EA340B) TACK COAT BETWEEN BITUMINOUS COURSES 11" BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE (MNDOT 2360 TYPE SPNWB330B) 6" MNDOT CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE APPROVED COMPACTED SUBGRADE — PARKING LOT 4" CONCRETE (MNDOT CONCRETE MIX 3A32) 1" CHAMFER 6.. T �- 4" MNDOT 3149.282 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW CONTRACTION AND EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AS PER MNDOT SPEC. APPROVED COMPACTED 2521.3C2 SUBGRADE OTHICKENED EDGE SIDEWALK J, NOTES J' PER FT SLOPE 1. FOR AREAS WHERE DRAINAGE IS DIRECTED AWAY FROM THE CURB, THE GUTTER SHALL BE TILTED TO DRAIN FROM THE CURB CONCRETE 2. CONCRETE SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF 6' MNDOT CONCRETE MIX 3A22 3. MNDOT 8612 CURB AND GUTTER SHALL MEET THE 1 REQUIREMENTS OF STANDARD MNDOT PLATE 7100 Cl) • a' I� le .,a•..•a. .. •• ••� 1 _ _ 2" MIN. COMPACTED MNDOT III—III-1 I—I I—I I—I I—III CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE —1 I— -� I— III—I I III BELOW CURB AND GUTTER - III—I I 1- I I El I I-1 APPROVED COMPACTED `- 20" _ SUBGRADE 2 CURB & GUTTER (MNDOT B612) NTS NTS 4" CONCRETE (MNDOT CONCRETE MIX 3A32) • ; r 4" MNDOT 3149.282 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW I �—III—III—III—III—III—III—III—III—III—III—I I -1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 I M —I I—I I—I I I—I 11-1 11-1 11-1 I—I I —I III -1 11-1 11-1 I I=— 11 —III =1 1 II I II IIl i lII �- -I II II I II APPROVED COMPACTED SUBGRADE STANDARD DETAILS NTS CONTRACTION AND EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AS PER MNDOT SPEC. w 2521.3C2 4 NTS CONCRETE SIDEWALK SECTION J �c0 STANDARD DETAILS NTS z 0z 0C) IJ 02 z O IL U LU LU 0 U O 0. CV w c0 0 >' co 't J �c0 O z L U N c� E' -U D_ N O U U J LU O 0:� 7- N M 't vJ s= Q � — } } — � N i3 w � C w0 LU o_ U} Q 70 Q o 04 Q i7 N N C U O O U LO O U O z 0 W 1L 1L •V/ �_ ' .L D J C — i n w 0 m `J 01:� I0O 0 O Z U 00 � U —:2 Z � (05 UJ CD o-0) w 17029 co ( N z a LL L N O UC N C O V z C2 of 7 W w N N 1 �~ �J ) � J a) 06 Q N rUn v L N O . LO 11z z O a� (\ \ \\ )N O N T) 00 T VJ VJ z 0z 0C) IJ 02 z O IL U LU LU 0 LU Z I-- 0 0 c� W LU O 0:� 7- N M 't z z W J Q W Q � � w0 LU w Q Q Z z CIO 0 z 0 00 J 0 �w QU 01:� Oz U o0 —:2 PROJECT NUMBER: '� 17029 a� 0 rn N O C2 of 7 Catch BasinConcrete Curb RTM = 955.9[1 �\ tch Basir A = 957.4 lanhole GENERAL GRADING NOTES: 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS INCLUDING LOCATIONS, AND RIM AND INVERT ELEVATIONS, OF EXISTING DRAINAGE AND SANITARY STRUCTURES. LOCATION AND SIZE OF EXISTING SANITARY, WATER, AND STORM SEWER STUBS, AND EXISTING GRADES SHALL ALSO BE VERIFIED. 2. EXISTING TOPOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION WAS OBTAINED FROM A TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY PROVIDED BY WEBB SURVEYING, MAPLE LAKE, MN (763) 898-9999. 3. BENCHMARK: TOP NUT OF HYDRANT LOCATED ON NORTHEAST SIDE OF OAKWOOD DRIVE (SEE PLAN) - ELEV = 959.37 (NGVD '88 DATUM) 4. NOTIFY ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF ANY INCONSISTENCIES ARE DISCOVERED BETWEEN ACTUAL SITE CONDITIONS AND WHAT IS SHOWN ON THE PLANS, WHICH ARE SIGNIFICANT ENOUGH TO ALTER THE INTENT OF THE DRAWINGS. 5. IF REQUIRED BY THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY, THE OWNER OR CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A PLUMBING PERMIT PRIOR TO THE INSTALLATION OF ANY STORM SEWER UTILITIES. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER ONE CALL AT (800) 252-1166 FOR A UTILITY LOCATE PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION AND VERIFY LOCATIONS OF UTILITIES BEFORE BEGINNING WORK. 7. SEE SHEET C2 FOR STANDARD DETAILS. 8. HDPE STORM SEWER CROSSING ABOVE AND WITHIN 10 -FT OF EXISTING OR PROPOSED WATER MAIN OR SERVICES SHALL MEET THE FOLLOWING STANDARDS PER THE MN PLUMBING CODE: 4"- 10" DIAMETER: AASHTO M252 12" - 60" DIAMETER: ASTM F2306 FITTINGS: ASTM D3212 SEE SHEET C6 FOR LOCATIONS OF NEW WATER MAIN AND SERVICES. 9. FINISHED ELEVATIONS OF LAWN/GREEN AREAS ADJACENT TO BUILDINGS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 6" BELOW FINISHED FLOOR OR TOP -OF -BLOCK ELEVATION. 10. CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM CALCULATIONS TO VERIFY EARTHWORK QUANTITIES. CONTRACTOR'S BID SHALL BE BASED ON EARTHWORK CALCULATIONS COMPLETED BY THE CONTRACTOR 11. SPOT ELEVATIONS ARE FLOW LINE AND/OR FINISHED GRADES, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. TOP OF CURB ELEVATIONS ARE 6" ABOVE THE FLOW LINE SPOT ELEVATION SHOWN ON THE PLANS, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 12. "EX" DENOTES EXISTING SPOT ELEVATIONS 13. ALL PROPOSED ELEVATIONS ARE TOP OF PAVING OR GUTTER, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. PROPOSED ELEVATIONS ARE INTENDED TO PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE TOWARDS CATCH BASINS AND/OR OUTLETS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO PROVIDE THE REQUIRED ELEVATIONS, WHICH WILL PROMOTE POSITIVE DRAINAGE THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT SITE. NOTE: CADD FILES FOR ESTIMATING EARTHWORK QUANTITIES ARE AVAILABLE TO CONTRACTORS FOR PREPARING BIDS. IN ORDER TO RECEIVE THE CADD FILES, THE CONTRACTOR WILL NEED TO SIGN A HOLD -HARMLESS AGREEMENT PROVIDED BY SCHULTZ ENGINEERING & SITE DESIGN, AND AGREE TO PAY A $50 PROCESSING FEE. THE CADD FILES WILL BE RELEASED UPON RECEIPT OF THE CHECK GRADING PLAN c c� N O 0 20 40 80 r` U O C E�� 0 :U N N N 'U-0 U� N Q N Q E E O N O 4 a N N Q O 70 U O O -0 3 '5 Ln N N O � C L" w � O m` ol N Cl) 0 Z N N U J 0 O N 0 1010 O MF1 v w (5 00 O Z Z or" i W L-1) i N C0 (0 I..L Z c @) LL] CD c ffo 0c) w _ M CO N Z o Q_ li ' ^ v Q U O Z O C W w Z N~ (1) v z U W -12 Z) Ax W 2 Q 1N vJ L N� > z 1 � \ O 0 N — \` O 07N �WW z `^' 0z Q J� Z O F- 0 - U LU n cn w Q Z W L-1) Q w0 O o Q V) Z Im o Z O00 LU O 0 Q:� Z N (1) v V Z In J_ m PROJECT NUMBER: 17029 N kk SCALE: 1 ''=20' C3 OF 7 Q W L-1) Q w0 LULU Q Qz Z Im o Z O00 0 � �U W i� O z U o0 -12 PROJECT NUMBER: 17029 N kk SCALE: 1 ''=20' C3 OF 7 PROJECT INFORMATION Project Description This project will consist of the construction of a new commercial retail building with an approximate footprint of 5,000 SF, as well as bituminous parking lot and concrete sidewalk areas. Disturbed Area & Impervious Surface Tabulation (within proposed construction area) Anticipated Disturbed Area 0.6 acres Existing Impervious Area 0.21 acres Proposed Impervious Area 0.48 acres Net Impervious Area Increase 0.27 acres Permanent Site Drainage The proposed project is designed to drain to an existing 15" storm sewer stub located near the north corner of the project site via new private storm sewer to be constructed as part of the project. Receivinq Surface Waters The following surface waters could receive storm water runoff from this project, and are within 1 mile of the project site: Surface Water Type of Impaired Special USEPA Approved TMDL Comments Surface Water Water? Water? for Impaired Water? Project not subject to NPDES Permit SEDIMENT AND OTHER POLLUTANTS This SWPPP has been designed mainly to provide erosion and sediment control of naturally occurring soils at this site (ie: sands, foams, and clays). Although this SWPPP does address pollution prevention of other man-made materials, it is assumed that these materials will consist of debris from existing structures and pavements to be demolished, or debris and chemicals (ie: fuels, new paints, etc.) resulting from new construction. There are no known solid wastes or hazardous materials buried below grade at this site. If such wastes or hazard materials are discovered during construction, the SWPPP Coordinator (described below) will be responsible for notifying the Engineer. This SWPPP will then be revised to address he presence and disposal of these additional pollutants EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS Standards and References Materials and construction methods of all BMPs included in this SWPPP shall be as per the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MNDOT) Standard Specifications for Construction, latest edition. The Contractor and SWPPP Coordinator shall obtain a current copy of MNDOT's Standard Specifications for Construction and familiarize themselves with the specification sections applicable to this SWPPP, as there are several BMPs that specifically reference these sections. The Contractor and SWPPP Coordinator shall be expected to be familiar with the applicable MNDOT specification sections during construction. No additional compensation will be paid to the Contractor for additional work due to unfamiliarity with these specification sections. Undisturbed Areas If shown on the plan, the Contractor shall delineate areas that are not to be disturbed on the site. This may be done with flags, stakes, signs, silt fence, etc., and shall be completed prior to the start of any grading operations. Regardless of the delineation method the Contractor chooses to use, the Contractor must communicate to his/her personnel and subcontractors that these areas are not to be disturbed and construction equipment (including trucks and personal vehicles) shall not be allowed in these areas. The Contractor shall minimize compaction and preserve topsoil as much as possible at the site. In pervious ("green") areas that are not essential to the construction of the project, the Contractor shall avoid construction traffic and maintain the existing condition of these areas. Temporary and Permanent Stabilization All exposed soil areas (including stockpiles) shall be provided with temporary or permanent cover within 14 days of construction activity temporarily or permanently ceasing in that portion of the site. Temporary or permanent drainage ditches or swales, which drain off-site or to a surface water, and are within 200 lineal feet of the property line or surface water shall be provided with temporary or permanent cover within 24 hours of construction. Placement of temporary or permanent cover shall be initiated immediately upon suspension or completion of excavation operations. Temporary Cover: If the Contractor chooses to halt grading operations in a portion of the site (or the whole site) for a period exceeding 14 days, and grading operations (rough or finish grading) in the affected areas has not yet been completed, temporary cover shall be placed. Affected areas consisting of drainage ditches or swales connected to, and within, 200 lineal feet of a property line or surface water shall be provided with temporary cover within 24 hours of connection. Depending on the Contractor's schedule, the temporary cover shall consist of one of the following BMPs: 1). Discanchored Mulch a). Discanchored mulch may be used in an area of the site (or the whole site) if the Contractor is halting grading operations for a period that is relatively short, but exceeds 14 days. b). The mulch shall be Type 3 per MNDOT Spec. 3882 c). An adequate quantity of mulch shall be evenly distributed to achieve 90% coverage of the exposed soils. d). Mulch shall be placed as per MNDOT 2575.3F. e). All mulch shall be disc anchored as per MNDOT 2575.3G. Prior to the placement and discanchoring of the mulch, the soils shall be loosened and the area smooth -rough graded per MNDOT 2575.3B1. f). Any areas that are exposed as a result of wind action after the initial mulch placement shall be covered with additional mulch to maintain 90% coverage. 2). Temporary Seeding with Mulch a). Temporary seeding with mulch may be used in areas of the site (or the whole site) if the Contractor is halting grading operations for a period that is relatively long. Although mulch still needs to be applied as described above, once the temporary seeding/turf is established, the mulch will no longer need to be maintained. The temporary seeding/turf will require very little maintenance. b). Prior to the sowing of temporary seed, the soils shall be loosened and the area smooth -rough graded per MNDOT 2575.361. c). Contractor shall utilize Seed Mixes 100, 110, or 130 per MNDOT Spec. 3876 for temporary seeding. d). Temporary seeding shall be sown per MNDOT Spec. 2575.3D. e). Once temporary seeding has been sown, mulch shall be placed over the area as described above. Permanent Cover: Upon completion of finish grading and/or placement of topsoil, initiation of the placement of permanent cover shall begin immediately over all exposed areas. This includes areas designated for impervious surfacing (ie: buildings, pavements/gravel bases, sidewalks, etc.). Where the construction schedule will not allow for the placement of the permanent impervious surfacing within 14 days of the completion of finish grading, temporary cover shall be provided in these areas, as described above, until the permanent impervious surfacing can be constructed. Affected areas consisting of drainage ditches or swales connected to, and within, 200 lineal feet of a property line or surface water, shall be provided with permanent cover within 24 hours of connection. Areas designated for permanent turf establishment shall be provided with one or more of the following BMPs (see plan): 1). Permanent Seeding with Mulch a). Unless otherwise noted on the plans, all areas designated for turf establishment shall be provided with permanent seeding. b). In addition to the plan included as part of this SWPPP, the Contractor shall verify if a Landscaping Plan has been included in the plans by the Architect. If a Landscape Architect has specified higher quality permanent cover (ie: sod, hydroseeding, etc.), the Contractor shall provide this permanent cover in lieu of the permanent seeding specified in this SWPPP. c). Prior to the sowing of permanent seed, the soils shall be loosened and the area smooth -rough graded per MNDOT 2575.361. d). Contractor shall utilize Seed Mix 260 per MNDOT Spec. 3876 for permanent seeding. e). Permanent seeding shall be sown per MNDOT Spec. 2575.3D. f). Once permanent seeding has been sown, mulch shall be placed over the area as described above (under Temporary Cover), unless noted otherwise. 2). Erosion Control Blanket a). Erosion control blanket shall be placed in areas as shown on the plan included in this SWPPP. These areas shall still be provided with permanent seeding, as described above, beneath the erosion control blanket. b). Erosion control blanket shall meet the requirements indicated in MNDOT Spec. 3885. See plan for category(s) of erosion control blanket. c). Erosion control blanket shall be installed as per MNDOT Spec. 2575.3J2. d). Erosion control blanket specified in drainage ditches and swales connected to, and within 200 lineal feet, of a property line or surface water shall be installed within 24 hours of the completion of finish grading (including permanent seeding). 3). Riprap a). Riprap shall be placed in areas as shown on the plan included in this SWPPP. b). All riprap shall be underlain with Type 4 geotextile fabric. The fabric shall meet the requirements of MNDOT Spec. 3733 and shall be installed as per MNDOT Spec. 2511.3B2. c). Riprap materials shall meet the requirements of MNDOT Spec. 3601, and shall be Class 3, unless noted otherwise on the plans. d). Riprap shall be considered "Random Riprap" and shall be placed as per MNDOT Spec. 2511. e). Although it is permitted for the riprap to be placed with machinery, it will be necessary for the Contractor to hand place some of the riprap in order to provide a dense, well -keyed layer of stones with the least practical quantity of void space. f). The minimum thickness of the riprap shall be 18 inches, unless otherwise noted on the plans. g). Riprap designated at the end of pipe outlets shall be placed within 24 hours of installation of the pipe outlet end section. h). Riprap specified in drainage ditches and swales connected to, and within 200 lineal feet, of a property line or surface water shall be installed within 24 hours of the completion of finish grading. Sediment Control The following sediment control BMPs shall be implemented as part of this project: 1). Silt Fence a). Silt fence shall be installed at the locations shown on the plan included in this SWPPP. b). Silt fence shall be machine sliced and materials shall meet the requirements of MNDOT Spec. 3886. c). Silt fence shall be installed as per MNDOT Spec. 2573.3C1. d). Silt fence shall be installed prior to any upgradient grading operations, and shall remain in place and maintained adequately until upgradient areas achieve Final Stabilization (see below) e). Silt fence shall be repaired or replaced if damaged during, or after, rain events, or if accumulated sediment on the upstream side of the fence reaches 1/3 of the height of the fence. Repair or replacement of silt fence shall be completed within 24 hours of discovery. f). Portions of silt fence may be removed to accommodate short-term activities, such as vehicle passage. Short-term activities shall be completed as quickly as possible, and new silt fence installed immediately after completion of the short-term activity. If rainfall is imminent or forecasted in the near future, new silt shall be installed regardless of if the short term activity has been completed or not. The Contractor is advised to schedule short term activities during dry weather as much as practicable. No additional compensation will be paid due to additional silt fence associated with short-term activities. g). Temporary soil stockpiles shall be placed on the site in areas upgradient from silt fence. Where the Contractor chooses to place temporary soil stockpiles outside designated silt fenced areas, the stockpiles shall be surrounded by additional silt fence. Under no circumstances shall temporary soil stockpiles be placed over surface waters, curb and gutter, catch basins, culvert inlets or outlets, or ditches. 2). Catch Basin Protection a). WIMCO Road Drain protection devices, as manufactured by WIMCO, shall be used for catch basin protection on this project. WIMCO can be contacted at (952)-233-3055, and their web page is www.roaddrain.com. b). "Road Drain Top Slab" devices shall be installed at all catch basin locations immediately after placement of the catch basin structures. "Road Drain Top Slab" devices shall remain in place and be adequately maintained until permanent surfacing is constructed (ie: curb and gutter, pavements, and/or gravel surfacing). In areas designated for turf establishment, "Road Drain Top Slab" devices shall remain in place until Final Stabilization of all upgradient areas is established. c). Upon construction of the permanent surfacing, the "Road Drain Top Slab" devices shall be replaced with the WIMCO product specified on the plans. The WIMCO devices shall remain in place until Final Stabilization of all upgradient areas has been established. d). The contractor shall install and maintain the catch basin protection devices as per the manufacturer's instructions and specifications. 3). Culvert Inlet Protection a). Culvert inlet protection shall be provided at all culvert inlet locations immediately after construction of the culvert. See plan included in this SWPPP for culvert inlet locations. b). Culvert inlet protection shall consist of geotextile fabric wrapped around, and completely covering the inlet end section. The geotextile fabric shall be the same fabric used in silt fence applications and meet the requirements of MNDOT Spec. 3886. c). The culvert inlet protection shall remain in place and adequately maintained until Final Stabilization of all upgradient areas has been established. d). Culvert inlet protection shall be repaired or replaced if damaged during, or after, rain events, or if accumulated sediment reaches 1/2 of the diameter of the culvert pipe. Repair or replacement of culvert inlet protection shall be completed within 24 hours of discovery. 4). Temporary Rock Construction Entrance a). Temporary rock construction entrances shall be installed at the locations shown on the plan included in this SWPPP. See detail for temporary rock entrance design. b). If the Contractor chooses to access the site from locations other than where temporary rock entrances are specified on the plans, additional temporary rock entrances shall be placed at these locations, as well. c). Temporary rock entrance shall be constructed prior to the start of grading operations, and shall remain in place and be adequately maintained until Final Stabilization has been established. d). Temporary rock entrances shall be maintained in such a manner that the entrances prevent sediment tracking onto adjacent streets. If a temporary rock entrance is found to be ineffective, it shall be replaced or improved within 24 hours of discovery. e). The Contractor has the option to place Type 4 geotextile fabric beneath the temporary rock entrance. The fabric may extend the life of the entrance as it will reduce rock "sinking" into the underlying soils. If the Contractor chooses to use fabric, it should meet the requirements of MNDOT Spec. 3733 and shall be installed as per MNDOT Spec. 2511.3B2. f). If sediment tracking from the site is discovered on adjacent streets, the sediment shall be removed with a street sweeper or other approved method within 24 hours of discovery. This shall be done throughout construction of the project. This sediment may be returned and graded over exposed areas of the site, or disposed of off site per MPCA requirements. The City may order street sweeping to be performed at the Contractor's or Owner's expense if City staff find that construction activities are resulting in sediment or debris being tracked onto City streets. 5). Filter Logs a). Filter logs shall be installed at the locations shown on the plan included in this SWPPP. b). Filter logs shall consist of Type Wood Fiber biorolls and meet the requirements of MNDOT Spec. 3897. c). Filter logs shall be installed as per MNDOT Spec. 2573.3-1. d). Filter logs shall be installed immediately after placement of erosion control blanket. e). Filter logs shall remain in place for the life of the project, and shall be allowed to degrade naturally. Dewatering If dewatering of sandy subsoils is required for this project, the pump discharge shall be treated prior to discharge off-site or into a surface water. Treatment of discharge shall be achieved with the use of a "Dandy Dewatering Bag" (or approved equivalent), as manufactured by Dandy Products,lnc. Dandy Products, Inc. can be contacted at (877) 307-0141, and their web page is www.dandyproducts.com. The "Dandy Dewatering Bag" shall be installed, utilized, and maintained per the manufacturer's instructions and specifications. Once dewatering water has been treated, it may be discharged off-site or to a surface water. The discharge shall be visually checked to ensure that it is relatively clean and not visibly different from any receiving waters. If discharge is noticeably "dirty", the Engineer shall be contacted as additional treatment methods may be necessary. Adequate erosion control shall be provided at the point of discharge if it is located in an area with exposed soils or established turf. This erosion control may consist of temporarily placed rip rap, or other approved energy dissipation measures. The type of erosion control measure shall be at the Contractor's discretion, depending on the location of the dewatering discharge and the unique site characteristics. The erosion control measures shall be effective and shall be maintained adequately such that no erosion occurs at the point of discharge. Pollution Prevention Manaqement Solid waste accumulated during construction, including collected sediment, construction materials, floating debris, construction debris, paper, plastics, and other solid wastes shall be disposed of in accordance with MPCA disposal requirements: 1). Building products that have the potential to leach pollutants shall be maintained under cover (e.g., plastic sheeting or temporary roofs) to prevent the discharge of pollutants or protected by a similarly effective means designed to minimize contact with storm water. 2). Pesticides, herbicides, insecticides, fertilizers, treatment chemicals, and landscape materials shall be maintained under cover (e.g., plastic sheeting or temporary roofs) to prevent the discharge of pollutants or protected by similarly effective means designed to minimize contact with stormwater. 3). Hazardous materials, toxic waste, (including oil, diesel fuel, gasoline, hydraulic fluids, paint solvents, petroleum-based products, wood preservatives, additives, curing compounds, and acids) shall be properly stored in sealed containers to prevent spills, leaks or other discharge. Restricted access storage areas shall be provided to prevent vandalism. Storage and disposal of hazardous waste or hazardous materials shall be in compliance with Minn. R. ch. 7045 including secondary containment as applicable. 4). Solid waste shall be stored, collected and disposed of properly in compliance with Minn. R. ch. 7035. 5). Portable toilets shall be positioned so that they are secure and will not be tipped or knocked over Sanitary waste must be disposed of properly in accordance with Minn. R. ch. 7041. The Contractor shall take steps to prevent the discharge of spilled or leaked chemicals, including fuel, from any area where chemicals or fuel will be loaded or unloaded including the use of drip pans or absorbents unless infeasible. The Contractor shall conduct fueling in a contained area unless infeasible. The Contractor shall ensure adequate supplies are available at all times to clean up discharged materials and that an appropriate disposal method is available for recovered spilled mate(als. The Contractor shall report and clean up spills immediately as required by Minn. Stat. § 115.061, using dry clean up measures where possible. If the Contractor washes the exterior of vehicles or equipment on the project site, washing shall be limited to a defined area of the site. Runoff from the washing area shall be contained in a sediment basin or other similarly effective controls and waste from the washing activity shall be properly disposed of. The Contractor shall properly use and store soaps, detergents, or solvents. No engine degreasing shall be allowed on site. The Contractor shall provide effective containment for all liquid and solid wastes generated by washout operations (concrete, stucco, paint, form release oils, curing compounds and other construction materials) related to the construction activity. The liquid and solid washout wastes shall not contact the ground, and the containment shall be designed so that it does not result in runoff from the washout operations or areas. Liquid and solid wastes shall be disposed of properly and in compliance with MPCA rules. A sign must be installed adjacent to each washout facility that requires site personnel to utilize the proper facilities for disposal of concrete and other washout wastes. FINAL STABILIZATION Final Stabilization shall be considered established once the following requirements have been achieved: 1). All soil disturbing activities at the site have been completed and all soils are stabilized by a uniform perennial vegetative cover with a density of 70 percent of its expected final growth density over the entire pervious surface area, or other equivalent means necessary to prevent soil failure under erosive conditions 2). The permanent storm water management system is constructed, and is operating as designed. Temporary or permanent sedimentation basins that are to be used as permanent water quality management basins have been cleaned of any accumulated sediment. All sediment has been removed from conveyance systems and ditches are stabilized with permanent cover. 3). All temporary synthetic and structural erosion prevention and sediment control BMPs have been removed from the project site. BMPs designed to decompose on site may be left in place. SWPPP NOTES W U) J Q L m W a� 0 Z I n o- n Cn N O U O � C O 0 E R O E N N N U -0 U N Q N aE O N a N N i Q O 70 O N C Z) a U O O — Ln N 0 C N O N .— C N QQO)C C LU LU o_ O m` a` N M O Z V) N U J O N Ln 0 1010 O M� F1 v (0 00 O Z or" co (0 I..L Z c @) LTJ CD N ffo co) UJ _ MCO N Z li -c ' ^ v Q U O Z C W UJ N��~^ vJ C C J (D Ax W 2 Q N vJ _0 L LCO q N > Z 1 � \ O 4.1 0 N — \` O U) N CO�c� T-- Z O Q_ U LU cn w Z O o LU O � Z V Z LU Z 0^/ U PROJECT NUMBER: 17029 Q W 0 LU LU > Z Q Z 0b 0 00 00 a wm m c - y - U O 0 L m pi N o + U- C O I I mad C M U .D CL 0 0 -2 UU N p O C OO WN~ ai�U II II II II II I _O C2 E 01 I-alMOI�,� H Z - y - U O J 01 >1 z W¢¢ 7C) + >,7C3 M U- C O } J Q L W M� W 0 0 0:al ma G N p O C OO WN~ IY] _O C2 E w Q O O II w D' CLI Z UqL 7C)� N FD i QU-)(D ^/ L.L p 0 o 3 J W I >-3:Z/i00 O N _W I G m 0 �W 2 — i v> W < 17029 } J Iw-a p W OLy ZpW 0" � 3 II 'o j >? I I �' � M N co (fl W (D p� = W ZZ F- m O H ¢ N Q p U ww a U > O (qW -� rn •L c N p w II y Q m Z 6 W �' x FI.�WIZ fw— F W� w Of Cn Cr N � a <'> ti¢ Ld NQ~ J w� It� W LLI a Q II W r � U ~ O NF'p¢ > L% p Hw F W wm m Q p mW � C J 7 � N = O Zw ZO d~ ¢� p- OJ F In of II II a u,2 a( U Z W ¢p¢ pJ Z¢ n J W LLOQO� m J WN lea T I I W Ca L,W Q� SU Q lL 0 II 1 Z QQ O?m Li W � tr O<' wW p Z� I I UJ 0J ¢ a' W �j� W II L m LLJ (n mNQa Q� LWJQ a� Mm JP li '�' Q WW (np O~ II >N ww 0 �IUH Ld ¢� wW UO -= Y Z Z p O H W W Z W~~ a O [] F a a 0 W K Z E; w zN W JW JHS Q� pw� -m w W QW ¢3 �mU1 O r (, F- N N WWF �� �W Ja V) -j it �J O -J = 0of gO O �r 0 � � UJ D' v~iwa- Fmw Z� laWl JO W¢li �} wvHi m} �F aW NmN II I .m-. O� OF aaa� X¢U H~N co N �W 1wH JPO p¢ Hp �M O� WS ZO -O o Em O u p� z Q �N cVa. L, L, ¢O N?¢ �� II UU U ~OMw Boz a I ® a¢ I Nom ZF- o::� ��V-JjW 1�x w ,. - Z J mW ap w II ��� N a W m X (/) i i Q °° Ja_ wp �' ma OW oo �o xZ ZN.. Qa p� Na ~ II Z Q�mO (= o~ OWVI Zma0O U Q _ p I NpW Up NQ nw Um W ¢� �<n �ro� w w 0 m¢ n= ow O' °�d II W w9 �W a� ,= W c°;c 1 ' pvl �O Z N o II QUQ -7 �Op 'M �! U Qa m HJ w W —?�, mow I I N W Fa-•Wp pfz� Z z U wa pmQ 5l ww wN �0 0a' M II ` 1 o >' NOQa a Z �� Ii ocn N= ow w0 }W <W II II cn F-F�a ¢ IJ-ip O U J Q¢ M pQw I I CD F- } Wgd N zw WL -U � II N U, U 2 Q- W- O W Z O ON Ow¢ wZwO c I I o WCL U_ Zln� ZUw F-<��O OOlwi F -W 3 3 � J II II N -JDX afn 0a � _ ZfnZJ Z r H Z p _ U"f0 O U (n�f0 << zo) �IW ¢ W X >- �ZZVJIIII A CALL TO GOPHER STATE ONE (454-0002) v� x v) m IS REQUIRED A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Gravel pad(s) MnDOT Class CA -15 or CA -25 Riprap RPS nn PRIOR TO PERFORMING ANY EXCAVATION. Title: Residential Building Erosion Control )ate: 03-05 Plate No. Revised: 03-05 6006 03-15 Geotextile fabric NOTES: Channelize runoff to sediment trapping device CD z Cn xl w 11114 Match Existing Grade SECTION B -B (not to scale) Original grade Ribbed or Corrugated steel plates Original SECTION A -A grade (not to scale) Sediment Trapping Device 0 E 0 U O O U a a vi 1\191IL UI VVUy PLAN Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Title: Commercial Gravel Construction Entrance Date: Plate No. 06-14 Revised'03-15 6002 \\1 Title: Inlet Protection Catch Basin Insert )ate: 03-07 I Plate No. Revised: 03-151 6004 10% MAX 0 + UJ-LLw EXISTING 11 ll PAVED 12' MIN ----I CONSTRUCTI❑N MATS, WOVEN OR TRM ROADWAY 50' MIN END OVERLAP 18' MIN TRM END OVERLAP WITH SPIKES OR STAKES STRAP CONNECTORS C❑NSTRUCTI❑N MAT END OVERLAP INTERL❑CK WITH STRAP CONNECTORS END OVERLAP, ° ° ° ° . ° i DISTURBED AREA, C❑NSTRUCTI❑N SITE, STABILIZED STORAGE AREA OR STAGING AREA SIDE OVERLAP SIDE ° ° 0 0 l ° C ° ° , OVERLAP _ 0 C ° ° J Q _U CL } 60 1 ° ° ° ° _1 0 ______________ PAD AREA (ANY SIZE) Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Title: Mud Mat Entrance Date: 06-14 Revised: 06-14 Plate No. 6003 OVERFLOW SLOT IN SHROUD WING NUT/ ATTACHMENT HOOK • • SILT FABRIC SLEEVE ® . • , PER MnDOT SPECIAL • • • ® PROVISION 3886 1 • II I I A _ it Q A . 4 �- r ' d A. A OVERFLOW SLOT IN SHROUD SILT FABRIC SLEEVE PER MnDOT SPECIAL PROVISION 3886 - - - - - - - - - - - - - I Title: _ _ _ Inlet Protection Standard Plate Library Grate Inlet Cover City of Monticello Date: Plate No. 03-07 Revised: 03-15 1 6005 SWPPP DETAILS z O CL U LU LU D - y - U O J 01 W 7C) + >,7C3 M U- C O z Q L N N N U 0 M� W 0 0 G N p O C OO U J IY] _O C2 E w Q O LLJ }} — "- (U O w _� CLI Z UqL 7C)� N FD i QU-)(D ^/ L.L U)U U O O U .0 >-3:Z/i00 O N � o C N I O O.- L U C C m 0 NUMBER: — i v> W < 17029 (0 O (.000 U _Z Z � M N co (fl W (D o a� W U) N / Z a 0 U N Z O W �' fw— U) 1 � a : C 20,5C U Q N N r � U > L% Cr z � C 7 � N = O T- U) U) z O CL U LU LU D I— Q F— w� ww Z Q Z C 0 0� J � w Q 0z 00 LU Z F- _J M� W 0 0 W 10:L LLJ O m CLI Z CV M d I— Q F— w� ww Z Q Z C 0 0� J � w Q 0z 00 V _Z to _J M� W W 10:L Q m Z �0 3 v ^/ L.L U)U 0 I PROJECT NUMBER: n 17029 rn N O I— Q F— w� ww Z Q Z C 0 0� J � w Q 0z 00 Catch BasinConcrete Curb RTM = 955.9[1 �\ tch Basir A = 957.4 lanhole SWPPP PLAN I 0 20 40 80 U O C O E R O cL- N N N U 0 U N Q O E JO Q N C) C) a Q�70 ON O U O O 0 5 Ln a� Lom.-� N 0- u) u) w � V z 0. Z W (D W C/) Zw V Z Ww N J �06 U U) LU O U O\ CD � O c m o co O 0 r U C7 N i i � � co co co co O C&a) 0 co 00 N E LL � cD U E O U C O1 N 0) Q N Cf)� LFr z� -r :3 N = O CD N .1 00 rU)U) Z O F- 0 - U LU n cn w Z O o V) LU O Q:� z N (1) v V z n J_ im Q W L/) Q w0 LULU Z Q Qz z O00 � W 0 �U it O z o U o0 PROJECT NUMBER: 17029 N , Cf) SCALE: 1''=20' O C6 OF 7 Catch BasinConcrete Curb RTM = 955.9[1 �\ UTILITY AND SURFACING NOTES: WATER AND SANITARY SEWER UTILITIES 1. WATER MAIN AND ANY WATER SERVICE LINES SHALL BE PLACED AT A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 8 FEET BELOW FINISHED GRADE. 2. IF CONFLICTS ARE DISCOVERED WHERE WATER MAIN CROSSES EXISTING SANITARY SEWER, SERVICE LINES, OR STORM SEWER, THE WATER MAIN SHALL BE RAISED OR LOWERED APPROPRIATELY WHILE STILL MAINTAINING A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 8 FEET BELOW FINISHED GRADE. 3. INSULATION SHALL BE PLACED AT ALL LOCATIONS WHERE STORM SEWER CROSSES SANITARY SEWER, WATER MAIN, OR ASSOCIATED SERVICES. INSULATION SHALL CONSIST OF AN 8 -FT X 8 -FT SQUARE OF 3" -THICK RIGID INSULATION. INSULATION SHALL BE PLACED BETWEEN THE STORM SEWER AND PIPE CROSSING WITH THE EDGES OF THE INSULATION PARALLEL TO THE PIPING AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE. 4. INSTALL SANITARY SEWER SERVICE LINE CLEANOUTS AS REQUIRED BY THE MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE 5. SEE SHEET C3 FOR STORM SEWER GRADING, AND SHEET C2 FOR MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS RELATING TO THE PLACEMENT OF THE UTILITIES. 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION. 7. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OF SANITARY SEWER, AND ORDERING ASSOCIATED MATERIALS, THE CONTRACTOR'S PLUMBING DESIGNER SHALL PROVIDE THE ENGINEER WITH THE TOTAL DRAINAGE FIXTURE UNITS (DFUs) FOR THE INTERIOR PLUMBING TO VERIFY THE CORRECT SIZING AND SLOPE OF THE SANITARY SEWER SERVICE OWNER/CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A PLUMBING PERMIT FROM THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY PRIOR TO THE INSTALLATION OF ANY SANITARY SEWER OR WATER UTILITIES. CONSTRUCTION OF SANITARY SEWER OR WATER UTILITIES SHALL NOT COMMENCE UNTIL AFTER THE PLUMBING PERMIT HAS BEEN OBTAINED, AND ANY AND ALL PERTINENT COMMENTS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED ON THE PLAN AND IN THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. SURFACING SUBGRADES SHALL BE SCARIFIED AND/OR COMPACTED AS NECESSARY TO ATTAIN THE REQUIRED COMPACTION DESCRIBED IN THE GENERAL NOTES (SHEET Cl). TEST ROLLING OF THE SUBGRADE SHALL BE OBSERVED BY A QUALIFIED GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER OR TECHNICIAN. LOCATIONS EXHIBITING EXCESSIVE RUTTING (PER MNDOT SPEC. 21 1 1) SHALL BE REPAIRED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO THE PLACEMENT OF AGGREGATE BASE. COMPACTION TESTING IN UTILITY TRENCHES SHALL BE PERFORMED BY AN INDEPENDENT TESTING FIRM. 2. GRAVEL BASE COURSES SHALL BE ROLLED AND COMPACTED. TEST ROLLING OF THE GRAVEL BASE SHALL BE OBSERVED BY A SOILS ENGINEER TO VERIFY STABILITY. tch Basir 3. ALL EXISTING BITUMINOUS OR CONCRETE EDGES, WHICH WILL ABUT NEW BITUMINOUS A = 957.4 OR CONCRETE SURFACING SHALL BE SAWCUT TO OBTAIN A VERTICAL EDGE. lanhole 4. EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL BE PLACED AT ALL LOCATIONS WHERE NEW CONCRETE ABUTS EXISTING CONCRETE, AND AT ALL LOCATIONS WHERE SEPARATE CONCRETE POURS ABUT EACH OTHER. 5. SEE SHEET Cl FOR SPECIFICATIONS REGARDING THE CONSTRUCTION OF PAVEMENTS, AND CURB AND GUTTER. UTILITY & PAVING PLAN I 0 20 40 is U O C O E R O cL- N N N U 0 U N Q Q E E 2 O O 4 0- N N Q O 70 O N a U O O -0 3 '5 Ln N N O � w � O m` 0 O N 0 1010 O LFF1 v w (5 00 O z Z" Z or W L/) 6 (o Cl) (0 I..L Z 5 w o o(.0� w _ co 00 N ZQ_ Q_ILLW ' ^ v Q U � O Z O C W w Z N��~^ (1) v z U vJ -12 06 Q N vJ L N� > z 1 � \ o� 0 N — \` O C0 N 00�c>� rWW z `^' 0z Q J� Z O F- 0 - U LU n cn w Q Z W L/) Q w0 O o Q V) Z Z O00 LU O 0 Q:� Z N (1) v V Z In J_ m PROJECT NUMBER: 17029 N kk SCALE: 1 ''=20' C7 OF 7 Q W L/) Q w0 LULU Q Qz Z Z O00 0 � �U W i� O z U CD0 -12 PROJECT NUMBER: 17029 N kk SCALE: 1 ''=20' C7 OF 7 I Catch BasinConcrete Curb RTM = 955.9[1 � LANDSCAPING SCHEDULE DECIDUOUS TREES QTY. KEY COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME 2 AB AUTUMN BLAZE MAPLE ACER FREMANII 'AUTUMN BLAZE' 1 DN ADEBORAH NORWAY MAPLE �� �i�� �•y, 71Q[ely�[�L^L�7 7� j 1 I BH I BLACK HILLS SPRUCE ACER PLATANOIDES ORNAMENTAL TREES MALUS 'SPRING SNOW' CONIFEROUS TREES PICEA GLAUCA DENSATA SIZE REMARKS 2.5" B&B STRAIGHT TRUNK NO V -CROTCH 2 5" B&B STRAIGHT TRUNK NO V -CROTCH 2.5" B&BI STRAIGHT TRUNK NO V -CROTCH 6' HT.I FULL FORM TO GRADE tch Basir A = 957.4 lanhole NOTE: THIS PLAN HAS BEEN PREPARED FOR THE PURPOSES OF THE SITE PLAN APPROVAL PROCESS. FOR SPECIFIC LANDSCAPING METHODS, DETAILS, AND SPECIFICATIONS A LANDSCAPE PROFESSIONAL SHOULD BE CONTACTED LANDSCAPE PLAN I I I I 0 20 40 80 SHRUBS 01 N w 9 FG FOERSTER'S FEATHER REED GRASS CALAMAGROSTIS X ACUTIFLORA'KARL FOERSTER' 18" HT., CONT. MIN. 5 CANES AT HT. O z Q L 2Oa�O U U SPEC. 17 BS TOR BIRCHLEAF SPIREA SPIRAEA BETULIFOLIA'TOR' 18" HT., CONT. MIN. 5 CANES AT HT. 1 O U J SPEC. 16 JB CRIMSON PYGMY DWARF JAPANESE BARBERRY BERBERIS THUNBERGII 'CRIMSON PYGMY' 18" HT., CONT. MIN. 5 CANES AT HT. SPEC. 10 CB CHICAGOLAND GREEN BOXWOOD BUXUS X'GLENCOE' 24" HT., CONT. MIN. 5 CANES AT HT. } } — � N O SPEC. 6 MP COMPACT MUGO PINE PINUS MUGO PUMILIO 'COMPACT SELECT' 24" HT., CONT. MIN. 5 CANES AT HT. } Q-0 - C } o 04 SPEC. tch Basir A = 957.4 lanhole NOTE: THIS PLAN HAS BEEN PREPARED FOR THE PURPOSES OF THE SITE PLAN APPROVAL PROCESS. FOR SPECIFIC LANDSCAPING METHODS, DETAILS, AND SPECIFICATIONS A LANDSCAPE PROFESSIONAL SHOULD BE CONTACTED LANDSCAPE PLAN I I I I 0 20 40 80 z O IL U LU LU (/) 0 U 01 N w 0 Cl) J b E c O O z Q L 2Oa�O U U N F 0 Q N 1 O U J LU O fl� z N cY) `t � } } — � N O w � U } Q-0 - C } o 04 Q U n C U O O O U O �3:Na�0 L L N Q CL O D C C — i n W m I'1 rno O 7 � 00 U Z CY) UJ CD o�� w c\I ( N Z a LL L 0 OC N C O V Z C Ww .N N E 1 �~ �/ ! C a) �C,6 = a N UO L (D N N (D > Lo °C oz �CY)� \ \\ O N ) 00 :3 eco T n VJ z O IL U LU LU (/) w Z F- 0 o LU O fl� z N cY) `t V z 0 co Q W V) � w0 1U w Z Q Qz z O00 � w 0 QU r Oz U o0 Q PROJECT ° NUMBER: 17029 NIL c J SCALE: N 1 "=20' O rl- CLI OF 1 i! 16'-0" I I I I I II I I 16'-0.. I- I �I I I... ----------- I I I I I I i i I ii I L.�.—.—._._._._._.-._1_._. I _I_ _.J._.I_._._.I i —�-�nL zo o SII I I I I I ;I I I j .I I I i t SII I I i l o I I i I' ii TENANT 1 TENANT 2 TENS I� , I i I, - � , O , I� , I ---------------------- ----- •----------------' I PROPOSED MECHANICAL AREA ; 42'-0" 24'-0" I 90'-0" 1 2 FLOOR PLAN Al Scale: 1/8" = V-0" CODE REVIEW NEW BUILD OCCUPANCY - M CONSTRUCTION TYPE - 2B BUILDING HEIGHTS AND AREA LIMITATIONS TABULAR = 2 STORIES / 55'/ 12,500 SF ACTUAL = 4,634 SQ FT / 1 STORY / UNSPRINKLED RESTROOM COUNT - TBD DEPENDANT ON TENANTS I I SITE SUMMARY PARCEL SIZE GROSS FLOOR AREA TOTAL IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE PROVIDED PARKING SPACES ADDL' PARKING SPACES AVAILABLE TOTAL PARKING PARKING STALL/AISLE DIMENISONS ZONING 32,723 SQ FT /.8 ACRES 4,942 SO FT 87% 28 ON SITE (INCL. 2 H.C.) 7 SPACES @ HOLIDAY SOUTH LOT I35 SPACES AVAILABLE * 9'W X 20'D / 24' AISLE B3 * 4,634 SQ FT INTERIOR FLOOR AREA X 90% = 4,170 SF / 200 SQ FT PER STALL = 20 STALLS REQUIRED -THIS REQUIREMENT WILL BE DEPENDANT ON THE ACTUAL TENANT USE. SITE PLAN N �1 Scale: 1" = 20 ft 'q 1 (010 1 a 140 1 ARCHITECTURE © 2017 STONE TENT ARCHITECTURE, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED This drawing is an instrument of service and is the sole property of Stone Tent Architecture, any use of this drawing without written consent by Stone Tent Architecture is prohibited. The architect shall not have control or charge of and shall not be responsible for construction means, methods, deviations, techniques, sequences or procedures, or for safety precautions and programs in connection with the work, for the acts or omissions of the contractor, subcontractors or any other persons performing any of the work, or for the failure of any of them to carry out the work in accordance with the contract documents. Always use dimensions as shown. Drawings are not to be scaled. Drawing scales as indicated are for reference only and are not intended to accurately depict actual or designed conditions. Written dimensions shall govern. 15001 140th st foreston, mn 56330 ph. 612.508.8099 erik@stonetentarchitecture.com stonetentarchitecture.com LAR ON BUILDING No. Date Appr Revision Notes 1 6/5/17 ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL 2 6/20/17 REVISED SUBMITTAL I. 0 No. Date Issue Notes F -- U I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared �— by me or under my direct supervision (n and that I am a duly Licensed Z Architect under the laws of the State 0 of Minnesota. U ccSignature O IL 0 ZArchitect I Erik P. Johnson T Registration 0 50962 O Date JUNE 5, 2017 z Project Title CROWN BAY UJ RETAIL BUILDING C� Q C/) r1 Project ID Vj-J 1020 z w OSheet Title W SITE PLAN WSheet No. 0 Q D P1 .._._....... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... —._._....... ...... ...... ...... ...... .._._........ I I --------------------------- -------------------- ' UGNAGIE :OGNAGE: ' 74 SO FT ; 50 SQ FT --------------------............ F-- --I I I I I I II II II II II I II II II II II II ' �- ------ 3 EAST ELEVATION 5-- A2 Scale: 3/16" = 1'-0" NORTH ELEVATION Scale: 3/16" = 1'-0" 1 SOUTH ELEVATION A2 Scale: 3/16" = 1'-0" x 11 8 1 2 I � _,_,_,_,_,_,_ ,------------------------- --------------------- UGNAGE &IGN GE 56 SO FT '---------- --------- 35 SO FT ' ------------------- II II II II II II = 4 WEST ELEVATION A2 Scale: 3/16" = 1'-0" 14 7\--O ------------- SNIGMAGE ' 35 SQ FT PARAPET EL. 28'-0 PARAPET I I EL. 22'-0" -------------------------, PARAPET L. ' E 19'-4 G Nk�I ----35-SQ FT----; PIER CAP EL. 13'-4 WINDOW HEAD EL. 9'-4" WINDOW SILL SLAB i -------------------------- / --------------- ------------ q I re -1-0 I a 10 0 1 ARCHITECTURE © 2017 STONE TENT ARCHITECTURE, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED This drawing is an instrument of service and is the sole property of Stone Tent Architecture, any use of this drawing without written consent by Stone Tent Architecture is prohibited. The architect shall not have control or charge of and shall not be responsible for construction means, methods, deviations, techniques, sequences or procedures, or for safety precautions and programs in connection with the work, for the acts or omissions of the contractor, subcontractors or any other persons performing any of the work, or for the failure of any of them to carry out the work in accordance with the contract documents. Always use dimensions as shown. Drawings are not to be scaled. Drawing scales as indicated are for reference only and are not intended to accurately depict actual or designed conditions. Written dimensions shall govern. 15001 140th st foreston, mn 56330 ph. 612.508.8099 erik@stonetentarchitecture.com stonetentarchitecture.com LA R SO ELEVATION KEY NOTES B U I L D I N G 1. EIFS (STUCCO APPEARANCE) 2. EIFS W/ PREFINISHED METAL ROOF EDGE 3. EIFS PILLAR CAP W/ PREFINISHED MTL FLASHING No. Date Appr Revision Notes 4. AWNING - COLOR TO BE COORDINATED WITH TENANT BRAND 1 6/5/17 ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL 5. ROCKFACE BLOCK VENEER 2 6/20/17 REVISED SUBMITTAL 6. BRICK VENEER PILLARS 7. ALUMINUM STOREFRONT WINDOWS & DOOR 8. PAINTED STEEL SUN SHADE - COLOR TO BE COORDINATED WITH TENANT BRAND 9. ROCKFACE BLOCK TRASH ENCLOSURE W/ PREFIN. MTL ROOF EDGE & PAINTED STEEL GATES 10. PAINTED HOLLOW METAL DOOR 11. ROCKFACE BLOCK VENEER PILLAR 12. PAINTED BOLLARD 13. WALL PACK LIGHT 14. DECORATIVE UP/DOWN ACCENT LIGHT SIGN SUMMARY BUILDING ELEVATION SQUARE FOOTAGE ON THE TWO STREET FRONTS = 3,100 SQ FT z ALLOWABLE WALL SIGNAGE SQ FT = 15% = 465 SQ FT 0 No. Date Issue Notes FREE STANDING MONUMENT SIGN - SEE 5/A2 I hereby certify that this plan, rr specification, or report was prepared I-- by me or under my direct supervision Cf) and that I am a duly Licensed T-8" Architect under the laws of the State PREFINISHED METAL O of Minnesota. BACKLIT BOX SIGN BY SIGN U MFR \ I �I rr Signature LL O Z Architect o NOT TO EXCEED t 100 SQ FT PER SIDE Erik P. Johnson T \ Registration O 50962 Date O JUNE 5, 2017 \ Project Title g CROWN BAY LU RETAIL BUILDING \ \ ROCKFACE BLOCK BASE Ill )( Ji Q Project ID i i V J 1020 z - - CONCRETE FOUNDATION LJJ OSheet Title 5 MONUMENT SIGN W ELEVATIONS A2 Scale: 3/8" = 1'-0" WSheet No. 0 0 D 2 I I x 11 8 1 2 I � _,_,_,_,_,_,_ ,------------------------- --------------------- UGNAGE &IGN GE 56 SO FT '---------- --------- 35 SO FT ' ------------------- II II II II II II = 4 WEST ELEVATION A2 Scale: 3/16" = 1'-0" 14 7\--O ------------- SNIGMAGE ' 35 SQ FT PARAPET EL. 28'-0 PARAPET I I EL. 22'-0" -------------------------, PARAPET L. ' E 19'-4 G Nk�I ----35-SQ FT----; PIER CAP EL. 13'-4 WINDOW HEAD EL. 9'-4" WINDOW SILL SLAB i -------------------------- / --------------- ------------ q I re -1-0 I a 10 0 1 ARCHITECTURE © 2017 STONE TENT ARCHITECTURE, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED This drawing is an instrument of service and is the sole property of Stone Tent Architecture, any use of this drawing without written consent by Stone Tent Architecture is prohibited. The architect shall not have control or charge of and shall not be responsible for construction means, methods, deviations, techniques, sequences or procedures, or for safety precautions and programs in connection with the work, for the acts or omissions of the contractor, subcontractors or any other persons performing any of the work, or for the failure of any of them to carry out the work in accordance with the contract documents. Always use dimensions as shown. Drawings are not to be scaled. Drawing scales as indicated are for reference only and are not intended to accurately depict actual or designed conditions. Written dimensions shall govern. 15001 140th st foreston, mn 56330 ph. 612.508.8099 erik@stonetentarchitecture.com stonetentarchitecture.com LA R SO ELEVATION KEY NOTES B U I L D I N G 1. EIFS (STUCCO APPEARANCE) 2. EIFS W/ PREFINISHED METAL ROOF EDGE 3. EIFS PILLAR CAP W/ PREFINISHED MTL FLASHING No. Date Appr Revision Notes 4. AWNING - COLOR TO BE COORDINATED WITH TENANT BRAND 1 6/5/17 ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL 5. ROCKFACE BLOCK VENEER 2 6/20/17 REVISED SUBMITTAL 6. BRICK VENEER PILLARS 7. ALUMINUM STOREFRONT WINDOWS & DOOR 8. PAINTED STEEL SUN SHADE - COLOR TO BE COORDINATED WITH TENANT BRAND 9. ROCKFACE BLOCK TRASH ENCLOSURE W/ PREFIN. MTL ROOF EDGE & PAINTED STEEL GATES 10. PAINTED HOLLOW METAL DOOR 11. ROCKFACE BLOCK VENEER PILLAR 12. PAINTED BOLLARD 13. WALL PACK LIGHT 14. DECORATIVE UP/DOWN ACCENT LIGHT SIGN SUMMARY BUILDING ELEVATION SQUARE FOOTAGE ON THE TWO STREET FRONTS = 3,100 SQ FT z ALLOWABLE WALL SIGNAGE SQ FT = 15% = 465 SQ FT 0 No. Date Issue Notes FREE STANDING MONUMENT SIGN - SEE 5/A2 I hereby certify that this plan, rr specification, or report was prepared I-- by me or under my direct supervision Cf) and that I am a duly Licensed T-8" Architect under the laws of the State PREFINISHED METAL O of Minnesota. BACKLIT BOX SIGN BY SIGN U MFR \ I �I rr Signature LL O Z Architect o NOT TO EXCEED t 100 SQ FT PER SIDE Erik P. Johnson T \ Registration O 50962 Date O JUNE 5, 2017 \ Project Title g CROWN BAY LU RETAIL BUILDING \ \ ROCKFACE BLOCK BASE Ill )( Ji Q Project ID i i V J 1020 z - - CONCRETE FOUNDATION LJJ OSheet Title 5 MONUMENT SIGN W ELEVATIONS A2 Scale: 3/8" = 1'-0" WSheet No. 0 0 D Luminaire Schedule Symbol Label QTY Catalog Number 3 CL1-90L-4K-4-BC Description Lamp Number Lumens LLF Wattage Mounting Height Lamps per Lamp CIMARRON CL1 90 LEDs - 4000K - 70 CRI 1 18194.73 1 205 20' IMARR N U1If T,p � SFORUL.01�� LED SPEClRII PRODUCT w4cpErfs) Congftctilm + LED W> yem have ouoiA powFr I;wr- •Stplishuerkallylinvisiddig- fftsold rmp v111a4e over-G4ergntprrlrarho¢I an ShDrt Yaousll'g for muim1iiii11 hffit tf wit: rirLlb FralerJion wilh sola r+�;auery Stop s cos um 01 Lin s'1g11111 debris from 9glflering on top of th e f alsM A + 1054 rru3 Myer available wilh 90L con. Nufmon ror in crea3itl lurneR OLOD(A +AuugggF h9l++e-die-[�896luminlinilea 1*0 vi sir�c arr�derat thermal managemerrr + 1_Ed el ectinwi 5. inadng PR mdoptirr&esPM2mdaplicalperrar- devioee,rgnyurrinnppmerin rn2r1 A 911il'aft' Eta69 ■ Sepmftoprcal errd eleetnciSoamper4- ■ RIC F%=eandesine �09eC" &Ad 910 LE} T4 U1E1h+ W LED rnUM tK gp¢r941m e4�rppgWi; p9rgogn P�Dy1dC8 i t51!d ISgN Rr4P�:1F rk 9*nm • Ulrel ppl1eas bra cul 5iliturle gas4let Enmrm Sw?e Lgcabpn C or ,'. TheISPO I, w6�IR9rprWmal smundeach desIlgWwlthAdAFV (if 1GIXIv If�9i�idu21 LED 18f IRE rdi: A4 312D@rk Lll�Ih�bit Gy i 32rd2rd �:'-;.� ■ &VdQhtGnhd;BCJDp4cd1ervn110t9eJDF 65% spllIigir9tlt00fl,,won't r .YE, Cnm fbmmeaperncearEPArelmmd Dmff:a e-T*YelrnrniRgytdn�r4. for Tpear!TyeIVdlebftbana PhD1o�etandc[[U rysamaraavailable for cur oto nrdrdf and drrnrnirlg aautta 13D LEO 110 u 1, + Stamped bagel pfovxlesmxhaniral canpression-taSe.8IME006alnR%Mry Lumenmainmmee; + 120 84 W.0IX0 BIp1rS J0QKtxI per IBM 094ENSOONB e CaFOKwn TW Humbal Sumwagt TI.I.111 aerie9 of aetdDDr 1rAJre9 lnslelleltion: •4YeI•45.0por.Inds,EPA •1.3IF•Twadie•cal.alurninumarm d99igns:The dKYaWarnloRersaMeakL+psweptlool4 kl Pl9rar �� ■ Suitable mr appIIcsUarrs r 3G W" "estralgMarmf0vMS WlenoL�xlgS Wsdrrg pre9enped by A?G 1 c�rr4Cglred IInert ro wnNuAy of We � Optica + FiAra shpe whh arm inglak4 far �e oif F • E�IUicaof 72rryhtrigr hmm LED umlip- irmWislianand mounts is 62 droit palm I ratioris WRh ifidI acIIC IEfm s tally he p !e7 tar IB y e II, III, W and ■ MI draeke6 mast arm IrWr and pale wd19 I�rllGpns a€> smr9e88feaftvanallie ahowlnQ.a molin1lpgfor VvKkEft I rE� 1 •,4em Dptl[5 desl ed farirnrlt mw 1A and My WPHMllon irlleriDr rarn5 2A9ee Ztrihu5 on Inder urwwgam page 3 F b t _ + Mf G I fxmOBa4 Pahl+ pOawdBt paIAL +OCT`.30001C 400mKrr-111 rxllahaDPIWatnornlral 5mlllhk;kness LEp n?'a purtlehiendl�Nlrberarmnly Fh a year Iimihed warranty lly ff rntse irdor- • {At 7f] Ir13hG[I vralt�rr=1,Yrx;r.nuhh@ArutdmLF.cartu lixilversal Irvul 4di8gIB 120-2771610, LhaNlg 5(YStl E# ■ Lks9eq 11r L1L15J9 and GSA C222a2%0- elep-darn transfoerner for 3+47.4f gaigrwet1q IMnI �& • Modal9 meal Dwe glllI CArrear- bum LCEnllallicalklns,tw1>>c7all kDEOX mgtorriKVa4KFCI]46C fACulfebslG`tarmor. Mbn:?PAWW.tlrSIdr'Aahts armn]pl ■ krtpmelic Mern191 Se2f-ploh54'ilDn ■ CA apwM d t IP66 • r)n44fo nid 1 greater than 9Crlro- JIRHar facbx antl less Clan 1 G% THD ■ OR9 x1an81 uAry oanbrlLh)aYal�Me d 0 ip 107 Dr C +wet C15h17 7mmidA TIMI: IlljfTLurq A,esr �,1a "M149 Y woo #I ORDERING INFORMATION stt Nw PACS 5PR1J1_DIRkG Sp" Long «gpi fillennluntk deuait • GreeGmllse, 9C 296Qf • Phone: 214 ri;'tl--..Wb�• l.. UMMO l Due le Uur{ulieuhlllr�Rti101q'IIour pifr]u�Os.L„dJu.1Wrlicalhfa ee2AkLILPLEe4`niCur'KAiL, au�■u LLahtlWo Q Ia' S SW-UMG LGFML 4 Wk.Il eeemd • W [ge.Flansim dih w rrt6¢M. xv jHWNprllrtH+pot'n r -.Si Q1 LGHM elrr ORW RIAW NVVMATION OitIDERrNG EXAMPL Ltrt-A 941.11 5It f7B APA3 1.1 i 71 s F --r--] - - F] 1 a a w - k CL1 b p1 LEL 9D4 Hyhhre}mhdeaiSr! � Lhr�7YY27L7FiQ i.e9.penuklrr� �C` [�cJigMcemml KHghlrepirrY.iL& ISM H[ IIC 900GrL 706frJrl�rrdeL @L,., -. 304 ;9C4gk4*-q'bre LEtq S 12W SK 51041 C4�co r CV Conlln.rr4•sdmmirq 2 2C8i AMWFMrim 11]6 1096 w9 ylfelhrawet W7�d!! � 9iQf911 q se wm A -vAnI*xMmebmk5�'s73MYumgell Ahl '11"�rmw girb III armmLiIt.acceptiIfor 90- M,r RPM 3`Roundpdeaoepier pr�il RPM 4'RVUWeaiapler (Arrroximpo 5 AIR N IC 1m1Yl b9hT,l AM V %yld pde PI AID M%W&R mrir,n7le# WI a: 6maa• F UN. 00 H7 6.k4aweoarmI&mr pL&ernr� 7�p,'�r� CIS lH'kHra,ar. RFM SrMind paoadapio- i m, UMN uralkr'Ial RCER (rapes X WR MM A WritfluxlQlmLurlrsliI re 91. Bkd nbue;1-120..2-20W. 2 'mrorlarm4lackel.indpdafi' WN YI 3'20Y,A-MV.5-4&045 i&*hl Agid &m s 11Xe I! GR f3.,. &134M 3 T li RS p4llnarrSNW SSB SiWntmL,% e14FI)omd PULE; A Typeru ao Ri6C 411 vinnl"ro SSS -20-40-1-A -,1m I�.muncOM CGNTRDL DPTIDNS 013-041 GS TYy)e V FB Fav!Greun SrPW 4 16.1-efri vmnu'°0lm WIR 'A'SCAPE 5W TS" 4 411de CC Ggldm coibr 1ki- ;wPLgtw9%=M;III4'&4WY 2L Tyw I1 hipIrC 97 MR Y11RP4: V1dChPE rnmlan oonlfar � a�T � raFro 0TWbe0m A IypIPP+ora4ad KilM HAIL TiMSmlrhdmodde 8 Fkd*oDwfolPIrhut"-I $CPk+ MWammehlamellGaow4V- 5. sriiaM kal,d r,rn to 2M 41L Type rp himud W W trererlS is 10%5 PhYnooF.niar<nrildmYaKl IOn Y d Peox-e"mi.ro*16101dNFA lIIIIIIliM 2R rypcll140.71 sgr60hl 7. kh"'�.+;Lf+.aAw. R■4{Uffr Irt6 4'.31.1 D - la; gcichrtafiri4xrieuveacviy■mtrdnv,l 3R TypeIIPUVAd GrFIGr1 trot+root,rdFlr'jitrm.nalogQmmPdarar&-gM AA r eNEWri ht P{1A W' ok NEAYITZ1�6cellre€�p1a€iB uTP1e;e N -mill ,off e MiSrT'i71FN'IeTr 1A A•Io-FrWRowTlpsl 11L1a1I-277.5=9911.6=347? 1AR AIFranrMwT1p9IROM W'nghl 10.1. Aub Fnwil Rx Tlqre I AUUW WL lett 2A A0 FM P;* TY" 1 2AA AM Prom Row TM 1 Rcmed 911` riI Ptd AMO Frmrt Row T1Pe 1 RociLad Jr1` InH ENEursAyNsaw 0 3Z 1 1 +0.1 +0.1 +0. 0.+0.1 +0.2 0 a 0.2 +0.2 +0.2 .2 +0.2 + +0. 51,0\ +0.2+0. +.3 0. + 0.6 0.7 0.7+.5+. ++ + + + + + + + + + 0.2 0.2 0.2 3 0 .8 1.1 1.1 1.0 1.0 0.8 . 0. + + + + + + + + + + + + + 0.1 0.2 0.2 .3 9 1.5 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.5 1.3 1.3 1.1 6 0.4 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + L J T 7 0.2 0.2 . 1.1 2.3 . 2.9 2.6 2.3 2.1 2.0 1.9 1.8 1.2 0. 0.4 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 0.2 0.2 . 0.3 .4 0. 1.3 3. 4.0 3. 1 3.0 2.8 2.6 2.5 2.4 1.3 5 0.3 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 0.2 0.2 0 0.2 .3 0. 0.5 0.9 2 3.0 .0 4.9 .8 5.3 4. 4.1 3.9 3. .3 2.6 1.0 0. 0.3 + + + 10.210.2 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 3 .3 0.2 0.2 0.5 1.1 .7 .0 4.5 .4 6.0 6.3 6.6 5.9 5. 5.1 4 4.8 .9 4.2 �.9 2.2 3 0.2 + + \ } .3 0.3 . 0.4 0.3 .4 0.5 1.2 2.6 4.7 4.5 4.7 7.3 7.6 7. 7.0 6 4 6. 2 6.3 .8 5.1 4.7 3.2 1.2 0.3 0.2 +0.3+0.4+.5+0.5+0.4+0. I. +.8+1.9+3.3+3.5+.0+4.2+4.1 +4.5+5.3+6.8+7.4+6.8+.5+6.5 .0 .6 7.0+6. +4.7+3. +2.5+1. +.4+0.3+0.2 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 4+ + + +0.1 0.5 0. 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.6 .6 1.1 2.2 3. 4.3 4.7 5. 4.3 4.2 4.4 5.0 6.1 6.0 5.5 5.5 5.7 6.7 7. .3 7. 5.2 4. 0.3 0.2 10.710 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +5.5+4.8 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 0.7 0 0.8+11.0 1.0 9 .9 1.1 2.0 2.9 3.7 4.2 5.3 6.9 .1 4.4 4.8 5.7 5.5 4.8 4.2 4.5 4.5 5.3 6.3 5.5 8 4.1 4. 1.1 .3 0.2 0.1 0.1 + + + + + + + + + 16.61 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 0.3 1.4 1.5 1.7 1. 3.8 4.8 5.7 6.6 5. 5.3 5.5 5.1 4.5 3.9 3.6 3.7 3.7 4.6 5.6 5.2 4.3 1 4.0 4.1 3.7 2.0 0. 0. . 0.1 0.1 1 2.1 2.3 2.6 2.5 2. 2.2 2.3 3.3 +.3+5.4 6.1 5.6 4.9 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.4 3.3 3.2 .1 5.0 5.6 4.5 4. 5.1 3.7 3.3 1.7 0. 0. 0.1 0.1 0 +0.0 .2+1.9+3.7+4.0+3.9 4.1 + +3.4+2.8+2.2+.1 +2.8 .44.2 4.6 4.1 .4+3. 9+2.9+.9+3.0+3.2+3. +.2+5.2 4.6+5.7+6. +4.8+4.0+2.9+1.0+ +0.1 0.1 +0 0.0 .1 0.3 3.7 5.7 6.8 6.3 5.8 .6 4.3 2.9 2.1 2.5 .1 3. 3.6 3. 2 .5 2.4 .4 2.6 2.8 3. 3.5 4. 6 6.4 5.9 4. 3.7 2.9 1.7 0.1 0�0 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 0.0 0 5.7 7.2 8.6 9.7 7.4 2.6 1.9 .7+3. 3.1 .7 0�\9 +2.0+2. 2.4 2. 2.9 3. 3.9 .6 4.6 .8 2.6 1.9 .6 0.2 '0.1 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +4.6-4 + + + 0.0 0 0 .2 1. 5.1 7.6 11.711.1 8.0 4.8 3.7 2.4 1. .7 1.5 1. 1.6 1. 1.9 .1 2.2 .4 2.9 3.9 4.6 4. 9 2. 1. 1.0 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 0.0 0 0. 0.1 0.3 7.9 6.6 7.9 8.8 7.9 4.6- 1 .3 1.4 1.5 .6+11.9 2.2 2.7 3.3 3. 3.2 . 2. 1.2 0.9 0. + ++ + + +AA4+ + + + + + I + + + + + + + + + 0.0 0. 0. .0 0.1 3 7.8 6.6 6.8 8.5 8.0 5.2 3.8 2.7 .0 \ T \ 8 2. 3.0 3 2 2. .2 1.7 .3 1. 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0. 0.5 4.2 6.4 6.9 7.1 9.0 7.5 4.9 .7 1.4 1.1 0.7 0.5 \ + + + + + + + +11. + + + + + + /\ 0.0 .0+0.0+0 0.0 0 1 0. 6.0 7.9 11.9 9.4 8.7 .2 4.4 3.3 0 + +0. +0. + + + + + + +10.6'10.97.4 + + + + + + + 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.1 .1 1. 5.9 7.2 10.010.9 7.4 4.4 3.4 2.6 1. 1.3 .3 1.1 +0�O(0.0+0.0+0.0+0. +0.1 10.2+ 2+4.7+6.7+7.7+7.8+6. +. +.1 +2.0+1 4g��/ �T +.9+0.8+0. .6+0 0.0 0:00 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 i0.3 .8 3.1 4.1 4.8 5.6 5.8 4.4 2.6 1. 1 7 0. 0.5 0.5 0. z� + + + t + + + + + + + + 28 ST�� + + \ o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0.3 1.4 2.0 2.7 3.3 3.9 4.2 . 1.3 0. 0.6 0 0.4 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ON SITE/ + +0.4 + + 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 1.0 1.3 1.8 2.2 2.3 2.6 2.5 1.7 1.1 .4 0.4 0.3 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +7 OFF SITE + + + + + 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 �.2 1. 1.6 3 3 0.3 + + t 10. 10. +0. +0. +0. t t + + + t + + + t t + + 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2 0. 7 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.7 0.5 .4 0. 0.2 0.2 0. .2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 .3 0.4 0.5 0. 0.6 0.4 0 0.3 0. .2 0.2 0.2 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 3 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0. .1 0-0- 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.2 3 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0 0.1 0. 0.1 .1 0.1 0.1 0 0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 .1 0 0.1 0.1 0 .1 1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0. 0.0+0.1 0 .1 S + + + + + + + + + + +0. +0. +0. + +0.0+0. + a h 1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. +0.1 +0. + .1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 .0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 .0 + 0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0%% +0.0 +0.0 + .0 + S � a < < +0.0 +O.O +O.O +O.O +O.O +O.O +O.O +O.O +O.O +O.O +O.O +O. b + 0 .0 0.00.00.00.0 )z ' \ t+++++0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 _ \\\ 0 +0. +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 .0 + +0.0 +00 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0 /J + +0.0 +0.0 .0 LOT 5 SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN 1 N 1 " = 20'-0" x�W04 Z o Z flerfecmr CSS s x CoQ Tk w fiemmn¢ 010o111m Kl lf9r 1 +k d r J tl Ead4 b"64 Ii" i 11 lib YM wi TKNA 160L -W 14th l S7 133Cp 1 ZO42 13125 -131961 13675' 129.51 467KI rrA [971.-Ri 214 27 19664 19dpG 15212 -AW IN% 1�T3, 6�Tm4inA f9llL it•165 39& -383 Pm 2521 29P-0 26M] V445 6011150 nii 1301.-4E Td v Fiat 8109 8104 84471 6439 RM 207DNM Iax-M 1A0• 157 liM 1t4S 1203& 124361 12581 11Rm7 46700gLA I KL -49 2111- 227 17143 19973 17#0 185211 20224, 17394 607OW � I n.4•105 330 383 23496 23612 24199 24MI 25357 23129 "1161", I U,x N 97 4 805 4668 488641M dz? 4K11 7GAnp3 1 x L-311 1411, 157 ma 3175 9356 9499I Eat 8&141 4 mcnp; 1 % fir 214- 277 13350 19&31- 13575 1 9331 14004 tagm3jl- 7m0nna � lU-X- 9� -3-- 17M 1-412 - 174R" 179-A t13v1' 1 E0105 nu � At+?'UM1J'FrVF �€ALA4S!'!IP OF77CS is ■ ids ILILit Lou. Cdr Pr.Ito;noG-re f] oadafship bppiatltrls Sp&A9F19119r1Udg hes 8kc+51opdd Trm 4p1iC9 - aleagnaC roof minibad 2nd propet 4hmng of IRB aub tla2lot�ip iquO.Iaridu an d 1h9If ni.MIT 1AantliffWrlmrrows2R{SeeCL1 tliStrldJGonIlslmrin2:iNter JelaN Cow 1A ■ W gimum iifumin6linn an fFUFO FUW diSPIRY • W-Ximum paba spabrg Uplic 2A + Exaellentirorm row uluminaition and dnve lane • Qptirnal ureformdy for driMg tans and inperipr {ow5 AGCE95THEYS EE NIM PACE ! 1JLE31 4 Lyrting - 401 Wlennhlm God eu m Greanilla. SC 2DW • fhoare: 461&IND Del to tullFukJ IS lrfmiuo+Our kl aae-MraDsm dre erLle[t La$rrtlW lmke. • �i Fe.■hrrn ■ F11111111"LlI . , • urr enLel'J pna Lk1s. utJ wltrehL Q Cie" 5'kl WAG Lfr1115 {J Rrkh arir*�ed + ra ewr rJm�ax+' ■w ur ■etdt va'rFpmrr + }nL•tl r';E+4 aursaa� sna 0 3Z 1 1 +0.1 +0.1 +0. 0.+0.1 +0.2 0 a 0.2 +0.2 +0.2 .2 +0.2 + +0. 51,0\ +0.2+0. +.3 0. + 0.6 0.7 0.7+.5+. ++ + + + + + + + + + 0.2 0.2 0.2 3 0 .8 1.1 1.1 1.0 1.0 0.8 . 0. + + + + + + + + + + + + + 0.1 0.2 0.2 .3 9 1.5 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.5 1.3 1.3 1.1 6 0.4 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + L J T 7 0.2 0.2 . 1.1 2.3 . 2.9 2.6 2.3 2.1 2.0 1.9 1.8 1.2 0. 0.4 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 0.2 0.2 . 0.3 .4 0. 1.3 3. 4.0 3. 1 3.0 2.8 2.6 2.5 2.4 1.3 5 0.3 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 0.2 0.2 0 0.2 .3 0. 0.5 0.9 2 3.0 .0 4.9 .8 5.3 4. 4.1 3.9 3. .3 2.6 1.0 0. 0.3 + + + 10.210.2 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 3 .3 0.2 0.2 0.5 1.1 .7 .0 4.5 .4 6.0 6.3 6.6 5.9 5. 5.1 4 4.8 .9 4.2 �.9 2.2 3 0.2 + + \ } .3 0.3 . 0.4 0.3 .4 0.5 1.2 2.6 4.7 4.5 4.7 7.3 7.6 7. 7.0 6 4 6. 2 6.3 .8 5.1 4.7 3.2 1.2 0.3 0.2 +0.3+0.4+.5+0.5+0.4+0. I. +.8+1.9+3.3+3.5+.0+4.2+4.1 +4.5+5.3+6.8+7.4+6.8+.5+6.5 .0 .6 7.0+6. +4.7+3. +2.5+1. +.4+0.3+0.2 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 4+ + + +0.1 0.5 0. 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.6 .6 1.1 2.2 3. 4.3 4.7 5. 4.3 4.2 4.4 5.0 6.1 6.0 5.5 5.5 5.7 6.7 7. .3 7. 5.2 4. 0.3 0.2 10.710 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +5.5+4.8 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 0.7 0 0.8+11.0 1.0 9 .9 1.1 2.0 2.9 3.7 4.2 5.3 6.9 .1 4.4 4.8 5.7 5.5 4.8 4.2 4.5 4.5 5.3 6.3 5.5 8 4.1 4. 1.1 .3 0.2 0.1 0.1 + + + + + + + + + 16.61 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 0.3 1.4 1.5 1.7 1. 3.8 4.8 5.7 6.6 5. 5.3 5.5 5.1 4.5 3.9 3.6 3.7 3.7 4.6 5.6 5.2 4.3 1 4.0 4.1 3.7 2.0 0. 0. . 0.1 0.1 1 2.1 2.3 2.6 2.5 2. 2.2 2.3 3.3 +.3+5.4 6.1 5.6 4.9 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.4 3.3 3.2 .1 5.0 5.6 4.5 4. 5.1 3.7 3.3 1.7 0. 0. 0.1 0.1 0 +0.0 .2+1.9+3.7+4.0+3.9 4.1 + +3.4+2.8+2.2+.1 +2.8 .44.2 4.6 4.1 .4+3. 9+2.9+.9+3.0+3.2+3. +.2+5.2 4.6+5.7+6. +4.8+4.0+2.9+1.0+ +0.1 0.1 +0 0.0 .1 0.3 3.7 5.7 6.8 6.3 5.8 .6 4.3 2.9 2.1 2.5 .1 3. 3.6 3. 2 .5 2.4 .4 2.6 2.8 3. 3.5 4. 6 6.4 5.9 4. 3.7 2.9 1.7 0.1 0�0 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 0.0 0 5.7 7.2 8.6 9.7 7.4 2.6 1.9 .7+3. 3.1 .7 0�\9 +2.0+2. 2.4 2. 2.9 3. 3.9 .6 4.6 .8 2.6 1.9 .6 0.2 '0.1 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +4.6-4 + + + 0.0 0 0 .2 1. 5.1 7.6 11.711.1 8.0 4.8 3.7 2.4 1. .7 1.5 1. 1.6 1. 1.9 .1 2.2 .4 2.9 3.9 4.6 4. 9 2. 1. 1.0 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 0.0 0 0. 0.1 0.3 7.9 6.6 7.9 8.8 7.9 4.6- 1 .3 1.4 1.5 .6+11.9 2.2 2.7 3.3 3. 3.2 . 2. 1.2 0.9 0. + ++ + + +AA4+ + + + + + I + + + + + + + + + 0.0 0. 0. .0 0.1 3 7.8 6.6 6.8 8.5 8.0 5.2 3.8 2.7 .0 \ T \ 8 2. 3.0 3 2 2. .2 1.7 .3 1. 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0. 0.5 4.2 6.4 6.9 7.1 9.0 7.5 4.9 .7 1.4 1.1 0.7 0.5 \ + + + + + + + +11. + + + + + + /\ 0.0 .0+0.0+0 0.0 0 1 0. 6.0 7.9 11.9 9.4 8.7 .2 4.4 3.3 0 + +0. +0. + + + + + + +10.6'10.97.4 + + + + + + + 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.1 .1 1. 5.9 7.2 10.010.9 7.4 4.4 3.4 2.6 1. 1.3 .3 1.1 +0�O(0.0+0.0+0.0+0. +0.1 10.2+ 2+4.7+6.7+7.7+7.8+6. +. +.1 +2.0+1 4g��/ �T +.9+0.8+0. .6+0 0.0 0:00 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 i0.3 .8 3.1 4.1 4.8 5.6 5.8 4.4 2.6 1. 1 7 0. 0.5 0.5 0. z� + + + t + + + + + + + + 28 ST�� + + \ o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0.3 1.4 2.0 2.7 3.3 3.9 4.2 . 1.3 0. 0.6 0 0.4 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ON SITE/ + +0.4 + + 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 1.0 1.3 1.8 2.2 2.3 2.6 2.5 1.7 1.1 .4 0.4 0.3 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +7 OFF SITE + + + + + 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 �.2 1. 1.6 3 3 0.3 + + t 10. 10. +0. +0. +0. t t + + + t + + + t t + + 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2 0. 7 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.7 0.5 .4 0. 0.2 0.2 0. .2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 .3 0.4 0.5 0. 0.6 0.4 0 0.3 0. .2 0.2 0.2 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 3 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0. .1 0-0- 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.2 3 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0 0.1 0. 0.1 .1 0.1 0.1 0 0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 .1 0 0.1 0.1 0 .1 1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0. 0.0+0.1 0 .1 S + + + + + + + + + + +0. +0. +0. + +0.0+0. + a h 1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. +0.1 +0. + .1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 .0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 .0 + 0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0%% +0.0 +0.0 + .0 + S � a < < +0.0 +O.O +O.O +O.O +O.O +O.O +O.O +O.O +O.O +O.O +O.O +O. b + 0 .0 0.00.00.00.0 )z ' \ t+++++0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 _ \\\ 0 +0. +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 .0 + +0.0 +00 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0 /J + +0.0 +0.0 .0 LOT 5 SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN 1 N 1 " = 20'-0" 0 IIIIIIIII U x�W04 Z o Z o�1 CSS s x CoQ L���Qzz ca) � 7 Z > C 4� E�r'"W� W 0 IIIIIIIII U x�W04 Z o Z Fa.� �� CSS o x L���Qzz ca) � 7 Z > C LLI E�r'"W� W Ew-- W H 0 z� �..2dz�� w r�k 00 00 . o W ZX �QZ>a IY. L) W r�nU ■ z�OW aw�zE- x�W04 U) CO �aw�W Z Fa.� �� CSS E-�E�a�o U�D W x L���Qzz ca) � 7 Z > C LLI E�r'"W� W Ew-- W H 0 z� �..2dz�� w Mx�E E,Wrs. Z W ZX �QZ>a IY. ■ o t! LO C\2 C\2 E- LCA efl O ■ ■ O Q WO U� W ZZ O Z M ■ ■ Sheet Number 0 0 0 E - w a W E- �QZ>a L) W C)Qw w z U OEC W >Qd x <� x x W �:) E- ■ ■ ■ ■ O Q WO U� W ZZ O Z M ■ ■ Sheet Number 0 0 0 eosin . RIM = 956.91 INV = 95321 e� 'Rin'="ms.i n ee RM = 95l . 6M -h- 1 M1 RIM = 957. ..s 'M RIM = 957.91 RIM - 95761 Ot 1 5507900 1 t Printed: 2:06 PM, 6/29/2017 Page 1 of 1 M:\01272-03\Excel\LaMont SS_20140818 STORM SEWER DESIGN PROJECT NAME:LaMont Retail Bldg YEAR STORM: 10 DATE: 6/5/2017 NOTE: Pipe lengths are from center of I PROJECT LOCATION: Monticello, MN structure to center of structure DESIGN BY: BJS MANNING'S "N" 0.013 CHECKED BY: BJS Structure Number Offset to Length Area Area Area Total Te to Time " i " Runoff Slope Pipe Capacity Velocity Upper Sump Lower Upper Lower Upper Lower Structure PIPE NOTES From To Station Center Feet Acres "C" x"C" C x A Inlet in Pipe in/hr (cfs) % Dia. In. Q (cfs) V (fps) Invert Elevation Invert Casting Casting Build Cover Cover Dimension CLASS CB1 CB2 80 0.22 98 0.22 0.22 10.00 0.48 5.8 1.25 0.37 12 2.17 2.76 954.45 954.15 958.45 959.00 4.00 3.00 3.85 48" V CB2 CB3 50 0.01 61 0.01 0.22 10.00 0.30 5.8 1.29 0.37 12 2.17 2.76 954.15 953.97 959.00 958.25 4.85 3.85 3.28 48" V CB3 CB4 140 0.08 93 0.07 0.30 10.00 0.85 5.8 1.72 0.37 12 2.17 2.76 953.97 953.45 958.25 957.50 4.28 3.28 3.05 48" V RD CB4 70 0.11 98 0.11 0.11 10.00 0.29 5.8 0.63 2.00 6 0.79 4.04 955.35 953.95 N/A 957.50 N/A N/A 3.05 48" V CB4 STMH1 20 0.16 98 0.16 0.56 10.00 0.09 5.8 3.25 0.50 15 4.57 3.72 953.45 953.35 957.50 957.60 4.05 2.80 3.00 48" V Printed: 2:06 PM, 6/29/2017 Page 1 of 1 M:\01272-03\Excel\LaMont SS_20140818 WSB Building a legacy — your legacy. July 5, 2017 Ms. Angela Schumann Community Development Director City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1 Monticello, MN 55362 Re: Crown Bay Retail City Project No. 2017-021 WSB Project No. 010266-000 Dear Ms. Schumann: 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763-541-4800 Fax: 763-541-1700 We have reviewed the site and civil plans received on June 5, 2017 as prepared by Stone Tent Achitecture and Schultz Engineering and Site Design and offer the following comments. Site Plan 1. The existing northerly access from Cedar Street could pose traffic conflicts given the proximity to the intersection with Oakwood Drive and the southerly access drive adjacent to Jimmy Johns. The northerly access is being proposed as a service drive only for truck deliveries and trash service in order to separate these trucks from the heavier used southerly access. The proposed service drive should be properly signed as such. 2. Note on the plans that all sidewalk and pedestrian ramps shall comply with MnDOT and ADA standards. Grading Plan 3. This plan sheet includes removals and proposed storm sewer and should be labeled as such. 4. Label percent grades and show drainage arrows for the parking lot. 5. Provide detail on the type and color of the retaining wall. Equal Opportunity Employer wsbeng.com K:\010266-000\Admin\Docs\LTR-a-schumann-Crown Bay 070517.docx July 5, 2017 Page 2 Utilitv and Paving Plan 6. The line type weights are all the same and difficult to decipher the actual proposed utility notes. A separate utility plan is preferred and will be required with the as -built drawing submittal. 7. Confirm the water service pipe size. The as -built indicate a 6 -inch service stub from the main. An existing 2 -inch water stub is identified on the plans. Depending on the use(s) of the building, the applicant should demonstrate that the proposed water service size is adequate for the user and if fire suppression is needed. If there are multiple tenants in the building, it will be required to split the service inside the building for each tenant and have separate meters for each tenant. 8. A note should be added to the plans that the City will not be responsible for any additional costs incurred that is associated with variations in the utility as -built elevations or pipe sizes and material types. These items shall be verified in the field prior to construction. 9. A utility excavation permit must be obtained from the Public Works department prior to commencement of utility connections. 10. Provide an as -built utility plan once construction is complete. Details 11. Detail plates shall be updated per the City's April 2017 General Specifications and Standard Detail Plates for Street and Utility Construction located on the City's website - Engineering department. Stormwater Management 12. We believe the existing 15" storm sewer stub that is extended to the site was designed to accommodate runoff from development of the site based on the capacity of the stub. So rate control will only need to be provided if you are exceeding the capacity of the stub. 13. The SWPPP indicates that the proposed site improvement does not create 1 acre or more of new impervious surface, thus volume reduction and water quality is not required. 14. Provide drainage calculations for the proposed storm sewer. 15. Identify all emergency overflow routes and elevations for the proposed parking lot catch basin on the grading plan. The EOF should be a minimum of 1.5' below the low building opening. 16. The minimum storm sewer pipe size shall be 15 -inch per City Design Manual. 17. Grading, drainage and erosion control shall comply with City's zoning ordinance. See Chapter 4, section 4.10 related to grading, drainage, stormwater management and erosion K:\010266-000\Admin\Docs\LTR-a-schumann-Crown Bay 0705l7.docx July 5, 2017 Page 3 control and the City's Design Manual- updated May 2017 located on the City's website - Engineering department. Please have the applicant provide a written response addressing the comments above. Please give me a call at 763-271-3236 if you have any questions or comments regarding this letter. Thank you. Sincerely, WSB & Associates, Inc. Shibani K. Bisson, PE City Engineer cc: Steve Grittman, NAC Enclosure skb K:\010266-000\Admin\Docs\LTR-a-schumann-Crown Bay 070517.docx City Council Agenda — 07/24/2017 2G. Consideration to approve Ordinance 667 and Summary Ordinance 667A for amendments to Monticello Zoning Ordinance Chapter 5, Section 3 for regulations for accessory use outdoor storage in industrial districts. Applicant: Citv of Monticello (AS) Property: City of Monticello Planning Case Number: 2017-020 A. REFERENCE & BACKGROUND The City Council is asked to review and adopt proposed amendments to the City's zoning ordinance for outdoor storage in the I-1 and I-2 industrial zoning districts, consistent with the Planning Commission's recommendation. Recent discussions by the EDA and IEDC regarding the availability of industrial land and the tools needed to achieve the City's comprehensive plan goals for attracting and retaining living wage jobs and diversification and growth of tax base have led to a staff review of the current zoning ordinances pertaining to industrial use types and more specifically to outdoor storage. The use of land for the construction of bricks and mortar buildings which produce both jobs and tax base is at the core of the rationale for the proposed changes to the outdoor storage regulations. At present, the City allows outside storage in the I-1 and I-2 zoning districts as a permitted use (except when directly adjacent to residential uses) in an amount that may be as large as the principal building of the principal use of a parcel. As such, large amounts of industrial land may be used to support outdoor storage accessory uses rather than preserving land which could be used for new or expanded principal use buildings. One of the primary goals for the amendment is to balance the need for outdoor storage for industrial uses with the preservation of industrial land for buildings and jobs. In addition, the proposed amendments attempt to address the comprehensive plan goal of encouraging step-up development overall and with maintaining compatibility with other land uses. Finally, the standards for the storage in terms of screening, fencing and surfacing lack needed clarity and clear references to other sections of applicable code. The proposed amendments address these issues through the following: Addition of a requirement for conditional use permit for outdoor storage in where outdoor storage is proposed to be located adjacent to non -industrial uses in both the I-1 and I-2 districts. Limiting the allowable area for outdoor storage specific to the district. Less outdoor storage would be allowed in the I-1 unless authorized through conditional use permit, while the current allowance for outdoor storage in the B. City Council Agenda — 07/24/2017 I-2 District (up to the size of the principal building) would be maintained. • Limiting the locations of outdoor storage to side and rear yards and side yards on double -fronting lots. Refined standards for fencing in both I -1 and I-2 Districts. Requires surfacing of outdoor storage and a reference to City codes for erosion control and stormwater management to support compliance with MPCA industrial stormwater permitting standards and City stormwater management best practices. Zoning ordinance definitions for light industrial and heavy industrial uses and allowable principal uses within each district are included for reference. Also attached are current examples of outdoor storage in Monticello. The examples vary in the amount of outside storage relative to the principal building. IEDC AND EDA Review The proposed amendments were reviewed by the IEDC in March and April. The IEDC recommended adjustment to the original amendment language proposed by staff. Staff had proposed language limiting outdoor storage in the I-1 District to 30% of the square footage of the principal building, with an allowance of up to 50% of the square footage of the principal building by CUP for the I-1 District. The IEDC recommended allowance for 50% of square footage of the principal building and up to the same square footage as the principal building by CUP. The EDA reviewed the proposed ordinance in May and concurred with the IEDC's recommendation to allow additional storage opportunity in the I-1. The EDA also requested some additional language clarifications and adjustment. As such, the EDA and IEDC's recommendations are reflected in the proposed ordinance amendments. Planning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission reviewed the attached staff report and materials for proposed amendments to outdoor storage ordinances in June. The Planning Commission acted to approve the proposed amendment, later rescinding the motion as the public hearing was not opened. The Planning Commission then held a public hearing on July 11th and held further discussion on the item. There was no public present to address the Commission on the item during either hearing. After discussion on July 11th, the Planning Commission recommended unanimously to approve the ordinance amendments as proposed. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: Planning Commission unanimously recommends alternative I below. Decision 1: Ordinance No. 667 Oil City Council Agenda — 07/24/2017 Motion to adopt Ordinance No. 667 for amendments to Monticello Zoning Ordinance Chapter 5, Section 3 for regulations for accessory use outdoor storage in industrial districts, based on findings in Resolution PC -2017-014. 2. Motion to deny adoption of Ordinance No. 667 for amendments to Monticello Zoning Ordinance Chapter 5, Section 3 for regulations for accessory use outdoor storage in industrial districts, based on findings to be made by the City Council. 3. Motion to table action for additional information. Decision 2: Summary Ordinance 667A 1. Motion to adopt Ordinance No. 667A for summary amendments to Monticello Zoning Ordinance Chapter 5, Section 3 for regulations for accessory use outdoor storage in industrial districts, based on findings in Resolution PC -2017-014. 2. Motion to deny adoption of Ordinance No. 667A for amendments to Monticello Zoning Ordinance Chapter 5, Section 3 for regulations for accessory use outdoor storage in industrial districts, based on findings in Resolution PC -2017-014. 3. Motion to table action for additional information. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the adoption of the proposed ordinance amendments. The proposed amendments support the comprehensive plan goals of attracting and retaining living wage jobs and diversification and growth of tax base through the maximization of industrial land for building and job creation. The ordinances also support a review for compatibility between differing land uses and maintenance of development requirements and standards. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Resolution PC -2017-014 B. Draft — Ordinance No. 667, Outdoor Storage Amendment C. Draft — Ordinance No. 667A, Summary Ordinance Amendment D. Excerpt, Monticello Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 5, Section 3 E. Excerpts, Monticello Comprehensive Plan 3 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2017-014 RECOMMENDING AMENDMENTS TO TITLE 10 OF THE MONTICELLO ZONING CODE RELATED TO CHAPTER 5, SECTION 3(D) — ADDITIONAL SPECIFIC STANDARDS FOR CERTAIN ACCESSORY USES WHEREAS, the Comprehensive Plan provides for goals of attracting and retaining jobs and increasing tax base; and WHEREAS, the Zoning Ordinance serves as the primary implementation tool of the City's Comprehensive Plan goals and objectives; and WHEREAS, Chapter 5, Section 5(3)(D) of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance relating to Outdoor Storage within industrial districts has been identified as benefitting from amendment in support of these comprehensive Plan goals; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on June 6th, 2017 on the amendments and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: 1. The proposed amendments improve the ability of the Planning Commission and City Council to direct land use and land use policy in the City. 2. The proposed amendments are consistent with achieving the goals and objectives outlined in the Comprehensive Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, that the Commission recommends that the City Council adopts the proposed amendments as presented and approved. ADOPTED this 6th day of June, 2017 by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2017-014 MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION Brad Fyle, Chair ATTEST: Angela Schumann, Community Development Director ORDINANCE NO. 667 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 10 OF THE MONTICELLO CITY CODE, KNOWN AS THE ZONING ORDINANCE, ADDRESSING CHAPTER 5, SECTION 3(D) —ADDITIONAL SPECIFIC STANDARDS FOR CERTAIN ACCESSORY USES AND STRUCTURES IT IS HEREBY ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota: Section 1. Chapter 5, Section 3(D) — Additional Specific Standards for Certain Accessory Uses and Structures is hereby amended to read as follows: (26) Outdoor Storage J%L (b) ft -_2 districts, the following shall apo (i) When abutting a zoning district or use of than industrial, roses distriet or r-esidefAial use, the outdoor sto use shallrequire authorization through a conditional use p it following the provisions of Section 2.4(D) of this ordinance. 14 (ii) The storage area shall be located within yard, except that an outdoor storage area may also include that area between the front building line and the rear yard along the interior lot side. Storage may not be located beyond the side building line on the street side of a corner lot. On a double fronting lot, outdoor storage may be located in the side yard only. (iii) In the I-1 District, outdoor storage shall be limited to 50% of the gross square footage of the principal building. Storage may be increased up to 100% of the gross square footage of the principal building by conditional use permit. (iv) In the I-2 District, outdoor storage shall be limited to an area not to exceed the gross square footage of the principal building. (v) In the I-1 District. outdoor storage areas shall meet the minimum building setback from all side and rear property lines per the requirements of this ordinance and when adjacent to zoning districts or uses other than industrial, shall be located a minimum of 50' feet from the adjacent property line. (vi) In the I-2 District, outdoor storage shall be setback 10' from all side and rear property lines and when adjacent to zoning districts or uses other than industrial, shall be located a minimum of 50' feet from the adjacent property line. ORDINANCE NO. 667 (vii) The area is fenced and screened from view of neighboring r-esiden4ial uses and from the public right of way in compliance with this section its sefflflrrarw i L OGC60. 4.1 a. In the I-1 district, screening shall consist of masonry walls or fencing constructed of wood or vinyl and shall provide for 100% opacity. Such fences or walls shall meet all other the requirements of Section 4.3 of this ordinance. b. In the I-2 District, metal fences may be permitted when the materials have been recycled and reprocessed to resemble new building materials and are designed for use as a fencing material, and when such materials are designed to resemble allowed materials as listed in section 4.3(J)(1). c. Additional landscaping of one evergreen tree per 6' of linear fenceline is required to be planted along the exterior of outdoor storage area in conformance with ection 4.1 of this ordinance. Trees may be staggered along fenceline. Fences and walls shall not exceed 15' in height as measured from the existing grade to the top of the fence panel. e. Height of storage may not exceed the screen in wall or fence, or the height of required landscaping. (viii) Outdoor storage shall be allowed only on improved surfa of asphalt or concrete. ft) Storage in shipping containers shall be prohibited unless h storage occurs within the screened outdoor storage area. (x) There shall be no storage of hazardous waste, as defined by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. (xi) Exterior storage areas shall comply with all applicable fire codes and no portion of the outdoor storage shall block access to hydrants, fire sprinklers, or other fire -fighting equipment. (Nifi) I,era (xiv) Vehiele storage sha4l not be pefmitted in front yards. (xv) Noise shall be controlled consistent with the standards of this ordinance. (xvi) All lighting shall be in compliance with Section 4.4 of this ordinance. (xvii) Does not take up parking space as required for conformity to this ordinance. 2 ORDINANCE NO. 667 (xviii) Outdoor storage areas shall comply with all requirements for grading, drainage, stomrwater managment and erosion control per Section 4.10 of this ordinance. Section 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to make the changes required by this Ordinance as part of the Official Monticello City Code, Title 10, Zoning Ordinance, and to renumber the tables and chapters accordingly as necessary to provide the intended effect of this Ordinance. The City Clerk is further directed to make necessary corrections to any internal citations that result from said renumbering process, provided that such changes retain the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance as has been adopted. Section 3. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage and publication. The ordinance in its entirety shall be posted on the City website after publication. Copies of the complete Ordinance are available online and at " Ar- `iceno City Hall for examination upon requf A .4 MEV V & I ATTEST: Jeff O'Neill, Administrator AYES: NAYS: Brian Stumpf, Mayor SUMMARY ORDINANCE NO. 667A CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA A SUMMARY ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 10 OF THE MONTICELLO CITY CODE KNOWN AS THE ZONING ORDINANCE FOR ADDRESSING CHAPTER 5, SECTION 3(D) — ADDITIONAL SPECIFIC STANDARDS FOR CERTAIN ACCESSORY USES AND STRUCTURES NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, on July 24, 2017, Ordinance No. 667 was adopted by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota Due to the lengthy nature of Ordinance No. 667, the following Summary Ordinanc 66;heen prepared for publication as authorized by state law. 'Aj� The ordinance adopted by the Council amends Title 10 of the Monticello Zoning Code. The general purpose of the ordinance amendments are to clarify various chapters and sections with changes to the following: 5.3 (D) (26). Outdoor Storage A printed copy of the whole ordinance is available for inspection by any person during the City's regular office hours. The complea ordinance be posted on the City's website following publication. -_ �M, APPROVED FOR PUBLYR 24'h day of July, 2017. L ATTE Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator VOTING IN FAVOR: VOTING IN OPPOSITION: A Monticello, Minnesota, this JNTICELLO Brian Stumpf, Mayor CHAPTERS: USE STANDARDS Section 5.1 Use Table Subsection (A) Explanation of Use Table Structure Vehicle fuel Sales C C CI 1� 5.2(F)(30) Vehicle Sales and Rental C 5.2(F)(31) Veterinary Facilities C 5.2(F)(32) (Rural) Veterinary Facilities C C C 5.20(32) (Neighborhood) Wholesale Sales P P P None Industrial Uses Auto Repair — Major C �P P 5.2(G)(I) Bulk Fuel Sales and P P 5.2(G)(2) Storage Contractor's Yard, Temporary 5.2(G 3 Extraction of Materials I I I 5.2(G)(4) General Warehousing C C P P 5.2(G)(5) Heavy Manufacturing C 5.2(G)(6) Industrial Services C P None Land Reclamation C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C 5.2(G)(7) Light Manufacturing P P P 5.2(6)(8) Machinery/Truck Repair P P 5.2(G)(9) & Sales Recycling and Salvage C C 5.2(G)( 10) Center Self -Storage Facilities P C P 5.2(G)( I1) Truck or Freight C P P 5.2 G I2 Terminal Waste Disposal & IC 5.2(�(13) Incineration Wrecker Services C P 5.20(14) Commercial Day Care Commercial Lodging C P C C C P C none none 5.2(F)( 12 5.2(F)(8) City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 321 CHAPTERS: USE STANDARDS Section S.3 Accessory Use Standards Subsection (C) Table of Permitted Accessory Uses Indoor Storage P P P P P P 5.3(D)(20) Incidental Light P P P P P P P P 5.3(D)(2 1 Manufacturing Machinery/Trucking C 5.3(D)(22) Repair & Sales Office P P P P P P none Off-street Loading Space P PC P P P P P P P 49 Off-street Parking P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P 4.8 Open Sales P C C C 5.3(D)(23) Operation and storage of agricultural vehicles, P 5.3(D)(24) equipment, and machinery Outdoor Sidewalk Sales & P P P P P P P P 5.3(D)(25) Display (businesses) Residential 5.3(D)(25)(a) Outdoor Storage P P P P P P P P P P Industrial 5.3(D)(25)(b) Park Facility Buildings & P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P 5.3(D)(26) Structures (public) Private Amateur Radio P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P 4.13(B) Private Receiving Antennae and Antenna P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P 4.13(C) Support Structures Retail Sales of Goods (as part of an office or P P P P P P C C 5.3(D)(27) industrial use) Shelters (Storm or P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P 5.3(D)(28) Fallout) Sign(s) P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P 5.3(D)(29) Solar Energy System P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P 5.3(D)(30) Swimming Pool P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P 5.3(D)(3 1 Taproom (Retail Sales Accessory to Production WF7 C C C C C C 5.3 D 33 Brewery) Large Trash Handling and P P P P P P P P P P P P 5.3(D)(34) Recycling Collection Area Page 370 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Section 4.8: Off - Street Parkinz CHAPTERS: USE STANDARDS Section 5.3 Accessory Use Standards Subsection (D) Additional Specific Standards for Certain Accessory Uses (26) Outdoor Storage (a) In all zoning districts, all materials and equipment, except as specifically denoted in this ordinance, shall be stored within a building or fully screened so as not to be visible from adjoining properties except for the following: (i) Clothes line pole and wire. (ii) Recreational equipment and vehicles, subject to off-street parking regulations in Section 4.8 of this ordinance. (iii) Construction and landscaping material currently being used on the premises. (iv) Off-street parking of passenger vehicles, emergency vehicles and -small commercial vehicles in residential areas, unless otherwise required to be screened according to Section 4.8 of this ordinance. (v) Propane tanks, fuel oil tanks, and other similar residential heating fuel storage tanks which do not exceed 1,000 gallons in capacity and shall not be located within five (5) feet of any property line. (vi) Wood piles in which wood is stored for fuel provided that not more than 10 cords shall be stored on any property. A cord shall be 4'x4'x8'. (vii) All wood piles shall be five (5) feet or more from the rear and side yard property lines and shall be stored behind the appropriate setback line in front yards. (viii) Solar energy systems. (ix) Wind energy conversion systems. (b) In the I-1 and I-2 districts, the following shall apply: (i) When abutting a residential district or residential use, the outdoor storage use shall require authorization through a conditional use permit following the provisions of Section 2.4(D) of this ordinance. (ii) The area is fenced and screened from view of neighboring residential uses in compliance with Section 4.1(I) of this ordinance. (iii) Storage is screened from view from the public right-of-way in compliance with Section 4.1(I) of this ordinance. (iv) Storage area is grassed or surfaced to control dust. (v) Vehicle storage shall not be permitted in front yards. (A) Noise shall be controlled consistent with the standards of this ordinance. (vii) All lighting shall be in compliance with Section 4.4 of this ordinance. (viii) Does not take up parking space as required for conformity to this ordinance. City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 387 CHAPTERS: USE STANDARDS Section 5.3 Accessory Use Standards Subsection (D) Additional Specific Standards for Certain Accessory Uses (27) Park Facility Buildings and Structures Limitations on number and size for accessory buildings and structures shall not apply to active or passive public park facilities. (28) Retail Sales of Goods (as part of an office or industrial use) (a) Location: (i) All sales are conducted indoors within a clearly defined area of the principal building reserved exclusively for retail sales. Said sales area must be physically segregated from other principal activities in the building. (ii) The retail sales area must be located on the ground floor of the principal building. (b) Sales Area. The retail sales activity shall not occupy more than fifteen (15) percent of the gross floor area of the building. (c) Access. The building where such use is located is one having direct access to a collector or arterial level street without the necessity of using residential streets. (d) Hours. Hours of operation are limited to 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. The provisions of this section are considered and satisfactorily met. (29) Shelters (Storm or Fallout) Storm and fallout shelters shall not alter the character of the premises with respect to the primary use as permitted in the district. (30) Sign(s) All signs within the City shall comply with the finishing standards contained in section 4.5: Signs Section 4.5, Signs. (31) Solar Energy Systems (a) All Solar Energy Systems (i) All solar energy systems shall be operable and maintained in good repair. (ii) Solar energy systems shall meet all required setbacks and height requirements of the underlying zoning district. (iii) Solar energy systems shall be an integral part of the structure to which they are attached. Page 388 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance CHAPTER 8: RULES & DEFINITIONS Section 8.4 Definitions Subsection (B) Lots MANUFACTURING, HEAVY: The manufacturing of products from raw or unprocessed materials, where the finished product may be combustible or explosive. This category shall also include any establishment or facility using large unscreened outdoor structures such as conveyor belt systems, cooling towers, cranes, storage silos, or similar equipment that cannot be integrated into the building design, or engaging in large-scale outdoor storage. Any industrial use that generates noise, odor, vibration, illumination, or particulate that may be offensive or obnoxious to adjacent land uses, or requires a significant amount of on-site hazardous chemical storage shall be classified under this land use. This use shall include any packaging of the product being manufactured on-site. Examples include but are not limited to the production of the following: large-scale food and beverage operations, lumber, milling, and planing facilities; aggregate, concrete and asphalt plants; foundries, forge shops, open air welding, and other intensive metal fabrication facilities; chemical blending, mixing, or production, and plastic processing and production. MANUFACTURING, LIGHT: The mechanical transformation of predominantly previously prepared materials into new products, including assembly of component parts and the creation of products for sale to the wholesale or retail markets or directly to consumers. Such uses are wholly confined within an enclosed building, do not include processing of hazardous gases and chemicals, and do not emit noxious noise, smoke, vapors, fumes, dust, glare, odor, or vibration. Examples include, but are not limited to: production or repair of small machines or electronic parts and equipment; woodworking and cabinet building; publishing and lithography; computer design and development; research, development, testing facilities and laboratories; apparel production; sign making; assembly of pre -fabricated parts, manufacture of electric, electronic, or optical instruments or devices; manufacture and assembly of artificial limbs, dentures, hearing aids, and surgical instruments or parts; manufacture, processing, and packing of food products or cosmetics; and manufacturing of components, jewelry, clothing, trimming decorations and any similar item. MARQUEE: Any permanent roof like structure projecting beyond a theater building or extending along and projecting beyond the wall of that building, generally designed and constructed to provide protection from the weather. MAXIMUM DENSITY: The number of dwelling units allowed per gross acre of land as controlled by an individual or joint ownership group. MEAN GROUND LEVEL: The elevation established for the purpose of regulating the number of stories and the height of buildings. Grade shall be the mean level of the finished surface of the ground adjacent to the exterior walls of the buildings. MICRO DISTILLERY: A distillery that produces 40,000 proof gallons of liquor or less annually. City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 449 Ideally, the Comprehensive Plan does not have an Economic Development chapter. The Land Use Plan would be sufficient to channel market forces to meet the development objectives of the community. In reality, certain development needs cannot be met without public intervention. The Economic Development chapter of the Plan focuses on the aspects of Monticello's future that require particular attention and action by the City. These actions include: ► Attracting and retaining jobs ► Expanding the tax base ► Enhancing the economic vitality of Downtown ► Facilitating redevelopment Attracting and Retaining Jobs The creation and retention of jobs is one of the most important objectives for Monticello. Jobs, particularly jobs with income levels capable of supporting a family, are key to achieving many elements of Monticello's vision for the future. ► Jobs attract residents to the community. Jobs will pay a critical role in creating the type of "move up" housing sought by the City. ► Jobs provide the income needed to support local business and government services. ► Retention of businesses promote community stability by keeping jobs and residents in Monticello. The Community Context chapter of the Comprehensive Plan contains a section on Employment. This section contains data about employment in Monticello and of its residents. Among the key findings in this section are: ► While the community added nearly 5,000 people between 2000 and 2010 according to the U.S. Census, it only added 1,430 jobs according to the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW). In 2010, the community had 6,992 jobs according to the QCEW but 7,093 people in the labor force according to the Census. 2008 Comprehensive Plan — Updated 2013 Economic Development 1 4-1 ► The U.S. Census Bureau, Center for Economic Studies' OntheMap website shows that in 2010 4,597 people leave the community each day to work, while 3,849 people come into the community to work. Only 835 both live and work in the community. ► Approximately 15% of residents in 2010 are employed within the community. This has dropped from 18% in 2002. ► As shown in Figure 4.1, 2012 data from the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development (DEED) on their mnprospector.com website shows that Monticello is made up of a wide range of small to medium sized employers. Only 10 employers have more than 100 employees. Over half have fewer than four (4) employees. ► Workers for Monticello businesses come primarily from Monticello and the surrounding region. Nearly 75% of people working in Monticello live in Monticello, adjacent townships, or other places in Wright and Sherburne counties (2010 OntheMap). ► Nearly 40% of Monticello residents work in Hennepin County, with the largest percentage in Minneapolis, Plymouth, and Maple Grove. Another 15% work elsewhere in Wright County, including Buffalo and St. Michael. ► The 2007-2011 American Community Survey (ACS) Census reported a mean travel time to work of 28.5 minutes. This is up from the 2000 Census travel time of 24 minutes. The mean travel time in the 2007-2011 ACS was 29.7 minutes for Wright County and 24.5 minutes for the region overall. Figure 4-1:2012 Total Establishments by Size 1-4 Employees 254 52.05 5-9 Employees 97 19.88 10-19 Employees 64 13.11 20-49 Employees 42 8.61 50-99 Employees 21 4.30 100-249 Employees 7 1.43 250-499 Employees 2 0.41 500-999 Employees 1 0.20 Background Reports The City of Monticello conducts studies and assessments as needed to help guide its economic development efforts. The findings and recommendations of these studies are summarized below with the most recent provided first. 2010 Business Retention and Expansion Research (BR&E) Report Monticello's Business Retention and Expansion (BR&E) program was initiated by the City of Monticello, the Monticello Chamber of Commerce and Industry, DEED, and the University of Minnesota Extension. It was also sponsored by over a dozen local businesses. Through the BR&E program, 60 businesses were visited. Findings from the visits and data analysis found: ► 78% of the visited businesses were locally owned and operated. ► 20% of businesses were in manufacturing, 18% in retail trade, and 13% in other services. ► The businesses employed over 1,600 full-time and 975 part-time employees, with a trimmed average (an average where the low and high were discarded to prevent skewing) of 15.38 full-time employees, slightly down from 15.52 three years ago. The firms also had a trimmed average of 7.76 part-time employees, up from 6.96 three years ago. ► Most full-time employees are in manufacturing, food and beverage, retail trade, and medical, while part-time employees are in medical, retail trade, and tourism/recreational services. ► Survey results indicated that the medical industry is the highest employer in Monticello, followed by retail trade and manufacturing. ► Businesses in the community are fairly stable with about half expecting some type of change. The BR&E identified four strategies aimed at helping businesses become more profitable. Each strategy was accompanied by a list of potential projects intended to be ideas for the community to explore. The implementation of the projects is intended to be a collaborative effort among the various sectors of the community. The four strategies identified included: 4-2 1 Economic Development City of Monticello ► Improve Business Retention and Expansion Through Technical and Development Assistance. ► Improve Labor Force Availability and Productivity. ► Improve Infrastructure to Help Move Goods, Customers, and the Labor Force More Efficiently. ► Improve and Promote the Quality of Life in Monticello. During the 2013 comprehensive plan economic development update process, it was noted that the 2010 Business Retention and Expansion Research strategies were similar to the 2008 Development Strategies. The review process identified the need to continue similar strategies into the future. Preceding the development of the 2008 Comprehensive Plan an assessment was conducted by St. Cloud State University to determine whether a bioscience park should be established in Monticello. At that time the bioscience industry was an economic development focus statewide. While the attraction of a bioscience business is not a particular focus of Monticello today, there are findings of that study that can be useful to consider in the overall development of economic development strategies for the community. Some of the Monticello's strengths for attracting businesses included: ► Land availability (compared to Metro Area). ► Access to major highways (I-94, U.S. 10 and STH 25). ► Regional growth of employment base. ► Development of local fiber optic system. ► Proximity to universities. ► Overall location. ► Expansive park system. ► Monticello Community Center. Recommended business development activities that apply to the attraction and retention of all businesses include ensuring that there are sites suitable and attractive to potential businesses available and ready for development. The community should continue to explore and establish partnerships with a variety of stakeholders that can work together to support business attraction and retention. This includes the identification of funding sources which may be an incentive for businesses locating in Monticello. When available the City should participate in special tax zones that have been made available at the state and federal level to support business development and retention. Expanding the Tax Base A traditional objective of local economic development planning is the expansion of the property tax base. Under the current system of local government finance, property taxes are the largest source of city revenue. For this reason, it is an important aspect of economic development planning in Monticello. Understanding the Property Tax System Effective strategies to promote the growth of the tax base require a clear understanding of the property tax system. Property Valuation There are three forms of property valuation. The foundation of the property tax system is Estimated Market Value. This amount is the value of a parcel of property as set by the County Assessor. In some circumstances, the State Legislature limits the amount of Estimated Market Value that can be used for taxation. These adjustments result in the Taxable Market Value. The value used to calculate property taxes is Tax Capacity. Tax Capacity Value is a percentage of Taxable Market Value. The percentage factors are set by the State Legislature and vary by class of property. Changes in the Tax System Traditional economic development theory seeks commercial and industrial development as a means of building tax base. Historically, the system supported this approach. A dollar of estimated market value of commercial -industrial property carried a higher tax capacity value than residential property. Over the past twelve years, tax "reforms" by the State Legislature have changed this situation. 2008 Comprehensive Plan — Updated 2013 Economic Development 1 4-3 Facilitating Redevelopment The Comprehensive Plan seeks to create a place where land use plans, policies, and controls work together with private investment to properly maintain all properties in Monticello. It is recognized that this approach may not succeed in all locations. Despite the best plans and intentions, properties may become physically deteriorated and/or economically inviable. In such places, city intervention may be need to facilitate redevelopment and prevent the spread of blight. This intervention may include: ► Acquisition of land. ► Preparation of sites for development. ► Construction or reconstruction of public improvements. ► Provision of adequate parking supply. ► Remediation of polluted land as needed. ► Removal of other physical and economic barriers to achieve community objectives. These actions may require the use of tax increment financing, tax abatement, or other finance tools available to the City. Development Strategies The following strategies will be used to implement the Comprehensive Plan in the area of Economic Development: 1. The City must use the Comprehensive Plan to provide adequate locations for future job - producing development (Places to Work). 2. The City should adhere to the Comprehensive Plan to encourage stable business setting and promote investment and expansion of facilities. 3. The City should coordinate utility planning and manage other development to ensure that expansion areas are capable of supporting new development in a timely manner. 4. The City will continue to work with existing businesses to maintain an excellent business environment, retain jobs, and facilitate expansions. 5. In addition to assisting business seeking to locate in Monticello, the City should actively target and market to businesses which will be a supplier, customer or collaborative partner to existing businesses within the community. 6. The City should target and market to businesses which would benefit from Monticello's utility and communications infrastructure. 7. The City will work with the CentraCare Health System to ensure the retention and to promote the expansion of health care services in Monticello. 8. The City will use the Comprehensive Plan to maintain and enhance the quality of life in Monticello as a tool for attracting businesses and jobs. 2008 Comprehensive Plan - Updated 2013 Economic Development 1 4-7 City Council Agenda — 07/24/2017 211. Consideration to approve Ordinance No. 672 and Summary Ordinance 672A for amendment to the Monticello Zoning Ordinance and amendment to the Official Zoning Map for rezoning from I-2 (Heavv Industrial) to Planned Unit Development for the Spaeth Industrial Park, to approve a Final Stage PUD, a Final Plat for the Spaeth Industrial Park, and Development Contract for the Spaeth Industrial Park. Applicant: Spaeth, Kenneth. (AS) Property: Legal: Lot 2, Block 3, Oakwood Industrial Park PID: 155018003020 Planning Case Number: 2017-017 A. REFERENCE & BACKGROUND Request(s): Final Stage Planned Unit Development Final Plat Rezoning to Planned Unit Development Development Agreement Deadline for Decision: July 7th, 2017, extended to Land Use Designation: Places to Work Zoning Designation: I-2, Heavy Industrial The purpose of the "I-2," Heavy Industrial District is to provide for the establishment of heavy industrial and manufacturing development and use which because of the nature of the product or character of activity requires isolation from residential or commercial use Overlays/Environmental Regulations Applicable: NA Current Site Use: Vacant Surrounding Land Uses: North: Industrial East: Industrial South: Multi -family Residential West: Industrial Project Description: The applicant is proposing a multi -lot and building industrial park. Each building is 6,976 square feet in area, for a cumulative total of 55,808 square feet of floor area. Because only the front two parcels front on City Council Agenda — 07/24/2017 Dundas Road, with 6 parcels served by an internal private common drive, the project requires PUD zoning. The layout of the project relies on a perimeter drive that provides access to, alternatively, parking areas serving the front access points of the buildings, then common truck courts that provide truck access to the service sides of each building. The parking and "front" access areas face outward to the north and south of the parcel, including toward Dundas Road on the north, and toward a stormwater pond and then the residential development to the south. The truck and service portions of each of the buildings is internal to the project. The project is anticipated to attract smaller individual industrial concerns that require spaces for office, fabrication, repair, warehousing, and possibly, limited areas of showroom. Occupants would have the opportunity to purchase individual lots subject to the overall PUD and association management requirements. Each building has about 12 parking spaces allocated to their parcel, however, it will be necessary that the parking and grounds will be commonly maintained under an association, so parking quantities would be shared between parcels. ANALYSIS Final Stage Planned Unit Development & Final Plat Ken Spaeth has submitted application for final plat and final stage PUD. The site and building plans continue to be consistent in configuration, scope and use as proposed under the development stage PUD. Planning Commission reviewed the Development Stage PUD, Preliminary Plat and rezoning to PUD in June, forwarding their recommendation for approval on to Council on the Development Stage PUD, rezoning and preliminary plat on June 26ffi. Council may wish to reference the staff report of June 26th, 2017 for the specific analysis of the uses and site plans within the plat and PUD. The final plat is consistent with the proposed preliminary plat in terms of lot configuration and size. The preliminary has also been revised to address the section line and plat boundary issue on the south side of the property. The final plat reflects the required boundary per the preliminary plat. 2 City Council Agenda — 07/24/2017 Staff have reviewed the revised plans and corresponding comment response letter. The revised preliminary plat and final plat package include many of the revisions requested by the City Engineer as detailed in the applicant's comment letter. Minor revisions to the civil plans are still required as a result of the review of revised plans. The City Engineer has submitted a secondary letter addressing the remaining items to be resolved. Final plat and PUD approval are contingent on the reconciliation of these items. In accordance with requirements of Zoning Ordinance 2.4(0) for Planned Unit Development, the applicant has also revised their PUD plans to address the conditions of the Exhibit Z approved with the Development Stage application. The applicant has provided a revised landscaping plan, pavement marking plan and truck circulation plan as required in the development stage approval for the PUD. The applicant has further indicated that building signage or business signage signage will be limited to entry and service doors only at this time. The applicant has provided a cross easement and association declaration, which has been reviewed by the City Attorney. Staff has recommended revisions to the document in reference to the stormwater maintenance agreement and will require those comments be addressed as a condition of approval. Any approval is contingent on compliance with the remaining conditions of approval for the plan sets, those conditions which are on-going, and those as related to the final execution of the development contract and review for building permit. Rezoning to PUD The City Council considers rezoning to Planned Unit Development in conjunction with the review of the final stage PUD and final plat. An ordinance has been prepared for the rezoning of the proposed plat of Spaeth Industrial Park Planned Unit Development District. The ordinance outlines the allowable principal and accessory uses within the PUD, incorporating the development plans by reference. Development Agreement A draft development contract for the plat and planned unit development district has been prepared. Consistent with past agreement and City policy, the agreement outlines the responsibilities of the development in regard to the public improvements within the plat, including the public water main and sanitary sewer serving the development lots. Specific requirements relating to the private stormwater improvements are provided for in Section 15 of the document. The agreement also documents procedures for erosion control and grading of the site. The development contract provides for the payment of required development fees, including trunk area charges and escrows related to the inspection and administration of the plat and development. The agreement is currently structured to include 3 City Council Agenda — 07/24/2017 payment of trunk area charges for all lots, including the outlot. The development agreement currently allows for the developer to pay the trunk area charges at the time of final platting, or the charges may be apportioned based on square footage to each lot as an assessment. Security and insurance requirements are also included within the agreement. Payment and submission of these items is required at the time of final plat approval. The agreement is binding on all successors, heir and assigns, including those entities which may purchase or lease development parcels or buildings within the plat. Final comments from the developer have not been received as of the time of this report, and as such, minor revisions to the agreement may occur. Substantive changes will require review by Council. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS The applicant is seeking a rezoning to PUD, approval of a final stage PUD, final plat, and corresponding development contract and PUD agreement. Planning Commission previously recommended approval of the Development Stage PUD, rezoning and preliminary plat. Decision 1: Rezoning to PUD and Final Stage PUD 1. Motion to adopt Ordinance No. 672 approving a rezoning to PUD for the Spaeth Industrial Park PUD District, and to adopt Resolution No. 2017-41 approving a Final Stage Planned Unit Development for Spaeth Industrial Park, based on the findings in said resolution, and the conditions attached to this staff report as Exhibit Z. 2. Motion to deny Ordinance No. 672 approving a rezoning to PUD for the Spaeth Industrial Park PUD District, and to deny adoption of Resolution No. 2017-41 approving a Final Stage Planned Unit Development for Spaeth Industrial Park, based on the findings to be made by the City Council. 3. Motion to table action on the request, based on findings to be stated by the City Council. Decision 2: Final Plat and Development Contract 1. Motion to adopt Resolution No. 2017-42 approving a Final Plat and Development Contract for Spaeth Industrial Park, based on the findings in said resolution, and the conditions attached to this staff report as Exhibit Z. L! City Council Agenda — 07/24/2017 2. Motion to deny adoption of Resolution No. 2017-42 approving a Final Plat and Development Contract for Spaeth Industrial Park, based on the findings to be made by the City Council. 3. Motion to table action on the request, based on findings to be stated by the City Council. Decision 3: Summary Ordinance 1. Motion to adopt Ordinance No. 672A, a summary ordinance for publication approving a rezoning to PUD for the Spaeth Industrial Park PUD District. 2. Motion to deny Ordinance No. 672, a summary ordinance for publication approving a rezoning to PUD for the Spaeth Industrial Park PUD District, based on the findings to be made by the City Council. 3. Motion to table action on the request. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Based on the revised plat and PUD plans submitted, staff recommends approval of the Final Stage Planned Unit Development, Rezoning to PUD District and Final Plat with the conditions in Exhibit Z. Further, staff recommends approval of the Development Contract as proposed and included for review with this report. As noted in the Development Stage PUD & Preliminary Plat analysis, the project varies from the standard zoning regulations in a few significant ways, but uses this flexibility in keeping with the City's overall development objectives. D. SUPPORTING DATA A. Resolution 2017-41 B. Resolution 2017-42 C. Ordinance #672 D. Summary Ordinance #672A E. Finance Plan — Spaeth Industrial Park F. Development Contract & Planned Unit Development Agreement — Spaeth Industrial Park G. Aerial Site Image H. Applicant Narrative I. Preliminary Plat, Revised J. Final Plat K. PUD Development Plans — Revised, including: a. Project Location Plan, Title b. Site Plan c. Grading and Drainage Plan 5 City Council Agenda — 07/24/2017 d. Sanitary & Water Utility Plan e. Landscape Plan f. SWPPP g. Existing Conditions and Removals Plan h. Details i. Phasing Plan j. Elevations k. Floor Plan 1. Photometrics L. ALTA Survey M. Fire Truck Circulation Plan N. Fire Hydrant Coverage Plan O. Pavement Marking Plan P. Truck Circulation Plan Q. Stormwater Calculations R. Stormwater Facilities Maintenance Agreement S. City Engineer's Letter, dated July 19th, 2017 T. Applicant Response Letter, dated July 12, 2017 U. City Engineer's Letter, dated May 31, 2017 Z. Conditions of Approval G City Council Agenda — 07/24/2017 EXHIBIT Z Rezoning to PUD, Final Stage PUD, Final Plat for Spaeth Industrial Park The applicant shall revise plans to address the remaining comments of the City Engineer per the letter dated July 19th, 2017. 2. The applicant shall execute and record the stormwater facilities maintenance agreement. 3. The applicant shall provide additional language related to the stormwater maintenance system within the required cross -access and parking easements and maintenance covenants supporting the planned unit development per the City Attorney's recommendations and shall execute and record the covenants. 4. Outdoor storage shall be prohibited within the planned unit development. 5. Building or business signage shall be limited to entry and service doors only at this time. 6. Continue to coordinate addressing and mailbox installations with City Building and Streets departments. 7. The applicant shall execute and record the development contract with the City specifying and securing all relevant aspects of the project. 7 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2017-41 APPROVING A FINAL STAGE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A MULTI -LOT INDUSTRIAL PARK FOR SPAETH INDSUTRIAL PARK WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted an application for approval of a final stage PUD and a request for rezoning to PUD, Planned Unit Development District; and WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted a request to rezone its property to PUD, subdivide it into eight parcels, and develop it as a common industrial project; and WHEREAS, the site is guided for industrial City's Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the subject property is currentl3q official Monticello Zoning Map and ordinance, the la>3IPlaces to Work" in the I-2, Heavy Indust X ing to the R WHEREAS, the proposed PUD zoning will accommodate the flexibility from fhe otherwise application regulations to allow a development project consistent with the required on the Monticello Comprehensive Plan; and L WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on June 6, 2016 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the applicant has revised and submit t Final Stage PUD plans in accordance with t e Development tuncil tage PUD, and 4 WH RE A , the City has considered all of the comments and the staff report for the Final Sta D, which are incorpor*y reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendatioIn of approval: 1. The PUkvides an appropriate means of furthering the intent of the Comprehensive Plan for the site by putting the existing and proposed buildings to industrial use. 2. The proposed improvements on the site under the Development Stage PUD are consistent with the needs of the PUD in this location as an industrial area. 3. The improvements will have expected impacts on public services, including sewer, water, stormwater treatment, and traffic which have been planned to serve the property for the development as proposed. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2017-41 4.. The PUD flexibility for the project, including parcels without public street frontage, are consistent with the intent of the City's economic development objectives, as well as with the intent of the PUD zoning regulations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOL VED, by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, The Monticello City Council hereby approves the Rezoning and Final Stage PUD for the Spaeth Industrial Park, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit Z as follows: A 1. The applicant shall revise plans to address the remaining comments of the City Engineer per the letter dated July 19th, 2017. 6 2. The applicant shall execute and recolyd the stormwater facilities maintenance agreement. 3. The applicant shall provide,*iditional language related to the stormwater maintenance system within the required crossiaccess and parking easements and maintenance covenants supporting the Manned uflq&Lvelopment per the City Attorney's recommendations and shall eute an d the covenants. Admah.- 4L 4. Outdoor storage shall be prohibited within the pla d development. 4 A 5. Building or bus' ess signage shall be limited to entry and service doors only at this time. 6. Continue to coordinate addressing and mailbox installations with City Building and %t�reets departments. 7. The applicant shall execute and record the development contract with the City specifying and securing all relevant aspects of the project. ADOPTED this 24th day of July, 2017, by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL K ATTEST: Jeff CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2017-41 Ul-A Brian Stumpf, Mayor CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2017-42 APPROVING FINAL PLAT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR SPAETH INDUSTRIAL PARK WHEREAS, the Monticello Planning Commission held a public hearing on June 6th, 2017, for the consideration of the preliminary plat of the Spaeth Industrial Park; and WHEREAS, after taking public comment, the Planning Commis n recommended approval of the preliminary plat of the Spaeth Industrial Park to the City Council; and WHEREAS, the Monticello City Council reviewed the rP Commission and approved the preliminary plat of Spaeth of the Planning on June 26th, 2017; and WHEREAS, the Monticello City Council rev d the final plat ofSdustrial Park on July 24th, 2017; and WHEAREAS, the preliminary and final plat for the ustrial Park identles the specific plans and uses for the proposed Spaeth Indus ial Park; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY IN C IL OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA, that the final plat of the Spaeth Industrial Park, rainage and utility easements as required, is hereby approved contingent upon meeting all conditions of the subdivision ordinance; and the follovying conditions: 1. The applicant shall revise plans to address,remaining comments of the City Engineer per the letter dated July 19th, 201 2.applicant sh cute a ecord the tormwater facilities maintenance agreement. 3. The pplicant shall provide addit l language related to the stormwater maintenance system within the required cross -access and parking easements and maintenance covenants supporting the planned unit development per the City Attorney's recommendations and shall execute and record the covenants. 4. Outdoor storage shalLbe prohibited within the planned unit development. 5. Building or business signage shall be limited to entry and service doors only at this time. 6. Continue to coordinate addressing and mailbox installations with City Building and Streets departments. 7. The applicant shall execute and record the development contract with the City specifying and securing all relevant aspects of the project. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MONTICELL0, MINNESOTA, that the document titled "Development Contract and Planned Unit Development and for Spaeth Industrial Park," with assignment of the specific terms and conditions for public improvements and the specific terms and conditions for plat development, is hereby approved. ADOPTED BY the Monticello City Council this 24th day of July. 2017. CITY OF MONTICELLO Brian Stumpf, Mayor ATTEST: Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator ORDINANCE NO. 672 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 10 OF THE MONTICELLO CITY CODE, KNOWN AS THE ZONING ORDINANCE, BY ESTABLISHING THE SPAETH INDUSTRIAL PARK PUD AS A ZONING DISTRICT IN THE CITY OF MONTICELLO, AND REZONING THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY FROM I-2, HEAVY DISTRICT TO SPAETH INDUSTRIAL PAJ&PUD. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: LOT 2 BLOCK 3, OAKWOOD JWPU L PARK THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF M�ELLO HER RDAINS: Section 1. Section 2.4(0) — Planned Unit Developments, Title 10 — Zoning Ordinance is hereby amended by adding the following: (XX) Spaeth Industrial Park PUD Dis (a) Purpose. The purposeA7paeth ndus ial Park PUD District is to provide for the development of certain reestate subject to the District for industrial land uses. -'W(b) Permitted tses. Permitted principal uses in the Spaeth Industrial Park PUD District shall be indindustrial uses as found in the I-2, Heavy Industrial District of the ticello Zoning Ordinance, subject to the approved Final Stage Development Plans dated , and development agreement dated , 2017, as may be amended. The introduction of aby other use fromany district, including Conditional Uses in the I-2 I istrict, shall be reviewed under the requirements of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 2, Section (0) — Planned S46, Unit Developments for Development Stage PUD and Final Stage trictofthe S I (c) Accessory Uses. Accessory uses shall be those commonly accessory and incidental to industrial uses, and as specifically identified by the approved final stage PUD plans, but shall not include outdoor storage or other activities. (d) District Performance Standards. Performance standards for the development of any lot in the Spaeth Industrial Park PUD District shall adhere to the approved final stage PUD plans and development agreement. In such case where any proposed improvement or use is not addressed by the Final Stage PUD, then the regulations of the 1-2, ORDINANCE NO. 672 Heavy Industrial District shall apply. (e) Amendments. Where changes to the PUD are proposed in the manner of use, density, site plan, development layout, building size, mass, or coverage, or any other change, the proposer shall apply for an amendment to the PUD under the terms of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance, Section 2.4 (0)(10). The City may require that substantial changes in overall use of the PUD property be processed as a new project, including a zoning district amendment. Section 2. The zoning map of the City of Monticello is hep amendment to rezoned the following described parcels from I-2, Heavy Industrial District to Spaeth Industrial Park PUD, Planned Unit Development District: Lot 2, Block 3, Oakwood Industria Additio onticello (subject to the replat as Lots 1-8, Block 1, Spaeth In strial Park). Section 3. The City Clerk is hereby directed to mark the official zoning map to reflect this ordinance. The map shall not be republished at this time. Section 4. The City Clerk is hereby directed to make the changes required by this Ordinance as part of the Official Monticello City Code, Title 10, Zoning Ordinance, and to renumber the tables and chapters accordingly as necessary to provide the intended effect of tJ1jM Ordinance. The City Clerk is further directed to make necessary correc 'ons to any internal citations that result from said renumbering process, provid that such changes retain the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance as has be Zpted. Section 5_ This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage and publication. The ordinance in its entirety and map shall be posted on the City website after publication. Copies of the complete Ordinance and map are available online and at Monticello City Hall for examination upon request. ADOPTED BY the Monticello ' Council this 24th day of July, 2017. ATTEST: Jeff O'Neill, Administrator Brian Stumpf, Mayor 2 ORDINANCE NO. 672 AYES: NAYS: SUMMARY ORDINANCE NO. 672A CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA A SUMMARY ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 10 OF THE MONTICELLO ZONING CODE, KNOWN AS THE ZONING ORDINANCE, SECTION 2.4 (0) — PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTS BY ESTABLISHING THE SPAETH INDUSTRIAL PARK PUD DISTRICT NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, on July 24, 2017, Ordinance No. 672 was adopted by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota Due to the lengthy nature of Ordinance No. 672, the following Summary Ordinanc 672A has been prepared for publication as authorized by state law. The ordinance adopted by the Council am#s Title 10 of the Monticello Zoning Code. The general purpose of the ordinance amendments is to establish the Spaeth Industrial Park PUD District by adding the following section and to rezonthe affected parcels as noted. IF' 4iL Section 2.4(0) — Planned Unit Developments, Title 10 — Zoning Ordinance is hereby amended by adding the following: the CitM following Spaeth Industrial Park PUD striw* Rezone the following parcels from I-2, Heavy Industrial District to Spaeth Industrial Park PUD, P, Tanned Unit Development District: Parcels: Lot Blo , Oakwood Industrial Park Addition to Monticello (subject �g replat% Lots 1-8, Block 1, Spaeth Industrial Park) ad copy of the whole ordinance is available for inspection by any person during lar office hours. The complete ordinance will be posted on the City's website 20' day of July, 40 PU ATION by the City Council of Monticello, Minnesota, this T CITY OF MONTICELLO Brian Stumpf, Mayor ATTEST: Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator VOTING IN FAVOR: VOTING IN OPPOSITION: SUMMARY OF EXPENSES/FINANCE PLAN - v2 Full Development 6/12/2017 Total Acres in Development 4.4 gross 3.88 net Total Acres in Phase 4.4 gross 3.88 net Total Units in Development 8 Total Units in Phase 8 Trunk Area Charges & Dedication Assessment Park & Pathway Dedication 12.0% 0.53 Not applicable as of 2/24/16 for commercial/industrial Park Dedication Provided Lot 2 12.0% 0.53 Park Dedication Required (11 %) to be assessed against lot Lot 3 10.7% Park Dedication Deficiency $7,717 to be assessed against lot Lot 4 Park Dedication Deficiency as a % of total 0.47 $7,717 to be assessed against lot Prevailing Park Dedication 10.7% 0.47 paid at prevaling rate at time of platting Net Park Park Dedication Required per Unit Lot 6 10.7% 0.47 Total Park Dedication Required to be assessed against lot NA 16.6% Special Assessments $11,972 to be assessed against lot Lot 8 Road Reconstruction 0.73 NA to be assessed against lot Lift Station NA $72,117.68 Booster Station NA Sanitary Sewer (gross acres) $3,316 4.4 $14,590.40 2017 non-residential rate; paid at prevaling rate at time of platting Watermain (gross acres) $2,452 4.4 $10,788.80 2017 non-residential rate; paid at prevaling rate at time of platting Storm Sewer (net acres, base fee) $3,543 3.88 $13,746.84 2017 industrial rate; paid at prevaling rate at time of platting Storm Sewer (net acres, alternate ponding fee) $8,503 3.88 $32,991.64 2017 industrial rate; paid at prevaling rate at time of platting Total amount to As $17,814 $72,117.68 Per Unit Assessment Lot 1 12.0% 0.53 $8,654 to be assessed against lot Lot 2 12.0% 0.53 $8,654 to be assessed against lot Lot 3 10.7% 0.47 $7,717 to be assessed against lot Lot 4 10.7% 0.47 $7,717 to be assessed against lot Lot 5 10.7% 0.47 $7,717 to be assessed against lot Lot 6 10.7% 0.47 $7,717 to be assessed against lot Lot 7 16.6% 0.73 $11,972 to be assessed against lot Lot 8 16.6% 0.73 $11,972 to be assessed against lot $72,117.68 City Fees/Deposit City Fee ( General overhead and Admin) 2.00% Legal 2.00% Planning 2.00% Engineering and Inspection Grading and Restoration 2.00% Streets and Utilities 5.00% GPS Locate $60 Total City Fees $2,805.40 Actual; cost reconciled at project completion $2,805.40 Actual; cost reconciled at project completion $2,805.40 Actual; cost reconciled at project completion Inspector/Engineer cost reconciled at project completion, Based $3,977.56 on cost of $198,878 $7,013.50 Inspector /Engineer cost reconciled at project completion 8 $480 Actual; cost reconciled at project completion $19,887.26 1 Improvement Construction Costs (Used to Calculate City Fees/Escrows/Securities) Notes Sanitary Sewer & Watermain Storm Sewer Roads, Driveways and Sidewalks/Trails Lighting, Street Signage, Mailboxes Grading Construction total (for purpose of calculating other fees) Lot Corners/Iron Monuments $300 8 Total Construction Cost for the purpose of calculating LOC Letter of Credit Amount (Total cost X 125%) Maximum allowable reduction prior to acceptance and bond ADDITIONAL REQUIRED LETTERS OF CREDIT Landscaping Prairie Restoration Tree Preservation Grading Total Additional LOC $140,270 NA NA NA $140,270 $2,400 $142,670 $178,337.50 90.00%1 $160,503.75 NA NA $3,000 4.4 $13,200.00 $52,000.00 (reserved for recording information) DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (Developer Installed Improvements) SPAETH IND USTRIAL PARK AGREEMENT dated , 2017, by and between the CITY OF MONTICELLO, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City"), and KENNETH J. SPAETH and THERESA L. SPAETH, husband and wife (collectively, the "Developer") REQUEST FOR PLAT APPROVAL. The Developer has asked the City to approve a plat and Planned Unit Development approval for SPAETHINDUSTRIAL PARK (referred to in this Contract as the "plat" and the "Development") consisting of 55,808 square feet and 4.4 acres to equal eight (8) industrialial lots. The land is situated in the County of Wright, State of Minnesota, and is legally described as: Lot 2, Block 3, Oakwood Industrial Park. 2. CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL. The City hereby approves the plat on condition that the Developer enter into this Contract, furnish the security required by it, and record the plat with the County Recorder or Registrar of Titles within 100 days after the City Council approves the final plat or the execution of this Contract, whichever occurs later. 193238vl The City hereby grants approval to the Planned Unit Development provided the development is consistent with the conditions of this Contract and the specific City conditions, requirements and PUD flexibility as set forth in City Resolution 2017-0, adopted by the Monticello Council on July 24t1'„ 2017, and subject to the conditions of Exhibit Z of the Staff Report 3. RIGHT TO PROCEED. Within the plat or land to be platted, the Developer may not grade or otherwise disturb the earth, remove trees, construct sewer lines, water lines, streets, utilities, public or private improvements, or any buildings until all the following conditions have been satisfied: 1) this agreement has been fully executed by both parties and filed with the City Clerk, 2) the necessary security has been received by the City, 3) the plat has been submitted to the Wright County Recorder's/Registrar's Office, and 4) the City has issued a letter that all conditions have been satisfied and that the Developer may proceed. 4. PHASED DEVELOPMENT. If this plat is a phase of a multi -phased preliminary plat, and the City may refuse to approve final plats of subsequent phases if the Developer has breached this Agreement and the breach has not been remedied. Development of subsequent phases may not proceed until the City approves Development Contracts for such phases. 5. PRELIMINARY PLAT STATUS. If this Plat is a phase of a multi -phased preliminary plat, and the preliminary plat approval for all phases not final platted shall lapse and be void unless final platted into lots and blocks, not outlots, within three (3) years after preliminary plat approval as specified by state law. 6. CHANGES IN OFFICIAL CONTROLS. For two (2) years from the date of this Contract, no amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan, or official controls shall apply to or affect the use, development density, lot size, lot layout or dedications of the approved plat unless required by state or federal law or agreed to in writing by the City and the Developer. Thereafter, notwithstanding 2 193238v1 anything in this Contract to the contrary, to the full extent permitted by state law, the City may require compliance with any amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan. 7. ZONING. Except as otherwise provided herein, the subject property shall be subject to the zoning regulations for the Planned Unit Development District and the requirements and standards of the I-2 District, in effect at the time the final plat is approved. 8. CONDITION FOR SUBSEQUENT APPROVALS. No final plat for changes or amendments to this PUD Agreement shall be approved, nor shall construction commence for such additional land uses, until an amendment of the PUD Agreement is processed and approved, subject to the requirements of the Monticello Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances. 9. DEVELOPMENT PLANS. The plat shall be developed in accordance with the following plans. The plans shall not be attached to this Contract. With the exception of Plans A and B, the plans may be prepared, subject to City approval, after entering the Contract, but before commencement of any work in the plat. If the plans vary from the written terms of this Contract, the written terms shall control. The plans are: Plan A - Final Plat Plan B - Final Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan Plan C - Project Location Plan Plan D - Site Plan Plan E - Existing Conditions and Removals Plan Plan F - Sanitary and Water Utility Plan Plan G - SWPPP Plan Plan H - Details Plan Plan I - Phasing Plan Plan J - Elevations Plan Plan K - Floor Plan Plan L - Photometrics / Lighting Plan 3 193238v1 Plan M - Landscape Plan Plan O - Signage Plan Plan P — Pavement Marking Plan 10. IMPROVEMENTS. The Developer shall install and pay for the following: A. Sanitary Sewer System B. Water System C. Private Storm Sewer System D. Private Streets E. Concrete Curb and Gutter F. Street Lights G. Site Grading, Ponding, and Erosion Control H. Underground Utilities I. Setting of Iron Monuments J. Surveying and Staking The improvements shall be installed in accordance with the City subdivision ordinance; City standard specifications for utilities and street construction; and any other ordinances. The Developer shall submit plans and specifications which have been prepared by a registered professional engineer to the City for approval by the City Engineer. The City may, at the City's discretion and at the Developer's expense, have one or more City inspectors and a soil engineer inspect the work on a full or part-time basis. The Developer, its contractors and subcontractors, shall follow all written instructions received from the City's inspectors subject to Developer's plans and specifications. The Developer or his engineer shall schedule a pre -construction meeting at a mutually agreeable time at the City Council chambers with all parties concerned, including the City staff, to review the program for the construction work. Within thirty (30) 4 193238v1 days after the completion of the improvements and before the security is released, the Developer shall supply the City with a complete set of reproducible "as constructed" plans, an electronic file of the "as constructed" plans in an auto CAD.DWG file or a .DXF file, and two complete sets of blue line "as constructed" plans, all prepared in accordance with City standards. In accordance with Minnesota Statutes 505.021, the final placement of iron monuments for all lot corners must be completed before the applicable security is released. The Developer's surveyor shall also submit a written notice to the City certifying that the monuments have been installed. 11. PERMITS. The Developer shall obtain or require its contractors and subcontractors to obtain all necessary permits, including but not limited to: • Wright County for County Road Access and Work in County Rights -of -Way • Wright County Soil Conservation District • MnDot for State Highway Access • Minnesota Department of Health for Watermains • NPDES Permit for Stormwater Connections • MPCA for Sanitary Sewer and Hazardous Material Removal and Disposal • DNR for Dewatering • City of Monticello for Building Permits 12. DEWATERING. Due to the variable nature of groundwater levels and stormwater flows, it will be the Developer's and the Developer's contractors and subcontractors responsibility to satisfy themselves with regard to the elevation of groundwater in the area and the level of effort needed to perform dewatering and storm flow routing operations. All dewatering shall be in accordance with all applicable county, state, and federal rules and regulations. DNR regulations regarding appropriations permits shall also be strictly followed. 13. TIME OF PERFORMANCE. The Developer shall install all required public improvements by August 30th of the year following the year of recording of the final platThe Developer may, however, request an extension of time from the City. If an extension is granted, it shall be 5 193238v1 conditioned upon updating the security posted by the Developer to reflect cost increases and the extended completion date. 14. LICENSE. The Developer hereby grants the City, its agents, employees, officers and contractors a license to enter the platted property to perform all work and inspections deemed appropriate by the City in conjunction with plat development. 15. EROSION CONTROL AND STORM WATER CONTROL. A. Prior to initiating site grading, the erosion control plan, Plans `B" and "G", shall be implemented by the Developer and inspected and approved by the City. The City may impose additional erosion control requirements if reasonably required. All areas disturbed by the excavation and backfilling operations shall restored as identified in the Construction Stormwater General Permit/SWPPP, unless authorized and approved by the City Engineer, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. Except as otherwise provided in the erosion control plan, seed shall be in accordance with the City's current seeding specification to provide a temporary ground cover as rapidly as possible. All seeded areas shall be maintained as necessary for seed retention. The parties recognize that time is of the essence in controlling erosion. If the Developer does not comply with the erosion control plan and schedule or supplementary instructions received from the City, the City may provide Developer with written notice of default. If the Developer does not cure the default within two (2) days after receipt of such notice, then the City will take such action as it deems appropriate to control erosion. The City will endeavor to notify the Developer in advance of any proposed action, but failure of the City to do so will not affect the Developer's and City's rights or obligations hereunder. If the Developer does not reimburse the City for any cost the City reasonably incurred for such work within thirty (30) days after receipt of the City's written request (which request shall include all supporting and related evidence necessary to substantiate the actual cost), the City 6 193238v1 may draw down the letter of credit to pay any reasonable and actual costs. No development, street or utility construction will be allowed unless the Plat is in full compliance with the approved erosion control plan. B. The Developer shall inspect, maintain, operate and replace in a good state of repair and safe condition all proposed drainage improvements, including, without limitation, the private storm sewer and infiltration systems on the Subject Property. Operation and maintenance shall be as provided in the recorded Stormwater Maintenance Agreement for the Subject Property. C. Operations and maintenance of the private stormwater system shall be specified within and provided for in the private covenant and association documents applicable to all lots within the development. 16. GRADING PLAN AND CERTIFICATION. The plat shall be graded in accordance with the approved grading plan, stormwater control measures and erosion control plan as set forth in Plan "B" and "G". The plan shall conform to City of Monticello specifications. Within thirty (30) days after completion of the grading and before the City approves individual building permits (except as permitted by this agreement or the Building Official), the Developer shall provide the City with an "as constructed" grading plan certified by a registered land surveyor or engineer that all ponds, swales, and ditches have been constructed on public easements or land owned by the City. Additionally, the "as constructed" grading plan will include a certification that the grading following construction activities has been undisturbed or has been returned to the state required in the grading plan. The "as constructed" plan shall include field verified elevations of the following: a) cross sections of ponds; b) location and elevations along all swales, wetlands, wetland mitigation areas if any, ditches, locations and dimensions of borrow areas/stockpiles, and installed "conservation area" posts; and c) lot corner elevations, and building pads. The City will withhold issuance of building permits until the approved certified grading plan is on file with the City and all erosion control measures are in place as determined by the City Engineer. The 7 193238v1 Developer certifies to the City that all lots with building footings placed on fill have been monitored and constructed to meet or exceed applicable specifications. 17. CLEAN UP. The Developer shall clean dirt and debris from streets that has resulted from construction work by the Developer, home builders, subcontractors, their agents or assigns. Prior to any construction in the plat, the Developer shall identify in writing a responsible party and schedule for erosion control, street cleaning, and street sweeping. The Developer shall pay a penalty of $100.00 a day for each calendar day that the streets are not cleaned in accordance with this paragraph. If the Developer repeatedly fails to clean streets in accordance with this paragraph, the City may, in its discretion, perform the work or contract to have the work completed and bill the costs to the Developer. The City will endeavor to notify the Developer in advance of any proposed action, but failure of the City to do so will not affect the Developer's and City's rights or obligations hereunder. If the Developer does not reimburse the City for any cost the City incurred for such work within ten (10) days from the date notice of the amount owed to the City is mailed, the City may draw down the Irrevocable Letter of Credit to pay any costs. No development, utility or street construction will be allowed and no building permits will be issued unless the Plat is in full compliance with the requirements of this Paragraph. 18. OWNERSHIP OF IMPROVEMENTS. A. Upon completion of the work and construction required by this Contract, the improvements lying within public easements shall become City property without further notice or action, with exception of the private streets and stormwater and stormsewer system. B. The City shall maintain the watermain and sanitary lines located within the easement in a safe and good condition, and shall maintain, operate, repair, replace and remove, if required, the watermain and sanitary sewer lines in compliance with all applicable governmental rules, regulations, and requirements. 193238v1 C. IF the surface of the easement area of any portion thereof shall be disturbed by the operation, maintenance, replacement or removal activities in connection with the use of the easement, said surface and improvements shall be promptly restored by the fee owner of the easement area to their condition prior to the disturbance. 19. CITY ENGINEERING ADMINISTRATION AND CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION. A. The Developer shall pay a fee for the City's engineering administration as related to the Public Improvements. City engineering administration will include monitoring of construction observation related to Public Improvements, consultation with Developer and its engineer on status or problems regarding the project, coordination for final inspection and acceptance, project monitoring during the warranty period, and processing of requests for reduction in security. Fees for this service shall be at standard hourly rates per the City's adopted fee schedule estimated to be five percent (5.0%), of the estimated construction cost of the Public Improvements, assuming normal construction and project scheduling. Developer will provide a $7,013.50 escrow, which is separate and in addition to any other escrow funds for this Development, to pay the fees owed to the City under this Section. The Developer shall pay for construction observation performed by the City's consulting engineer. Construction observation shall include part or full time inspection of proposed public utilities and will be billed on standard hourly rates per City's adopted fee schedule. The cost of the construction observation is included in the five (5%) estimate. B. The Developer shall pay a fee for the City's engineering administration as related to grading and restoration of the Subject Property. City engineering administration will include monitoring of construction observation related to grading and restoration of the site, consultation with Developer and his engineer on status or problems regarding the project, coordination for final inspection and acceptance, and processing of requests for reduction in security. Fees for this service shall be at standard hourly rates per the 9 193238v1 City's adopted fee schedule estimated to be two percent (2.0%), of the estimated construction cost of the Subject Property grading and restoration cost, assuming normal construction and project scheduling. Developer will provide an $3,977.56 escrow, which is separate and in addition to any other escrow funds for this Development. The Developer shall pay for construction observation performed by the City's consulting engineer. Construction observation shall include part or full time inspection of proposed public utilities and will be billed on standard hourly rates per City's adopted fee schedule. C. The fees owed by the Developer to the City under this Section shall be paid from the escrows amounts. Any amounts not utilized from the escrow account shall be returned to the Developer when all the Development has been completed in accordance with this Agreement. If additional escrow amounts are required for such costs incurred beyond the escrow deposit, the Developer shall be billed directly for such costs and there shall be no issuance of occupancy permits until all such obligations have been fully paid. 20. CITY PLANNING, LEGAL AND ADMINISTRATION. A. The Developer shall submit an escrow deposit for fees for City staff administration relating to processing of the Plat and associated administration. Fees for this service shall be at standard hourly rates per the City's adopted fee schedule estimated to be two percent (2.0%), or $2,000 minimum, of the estimated construction cost of the Public Improvements, assuming normal construction and project scheduling. Developer will provide a $2,805.40 escrow, which is separate and in addition to any other escrow funds for this Development. This amount is subject to reconciliation based on actual costs at the completion of the project. B. The Developer shall submit an escrow deposit for fees relating to City planning -related expenses associated with the Plat development. Fees for this service shall be at standard hourly rates per the City's adopted fee schedule estimated to be two percent (2.0%), or $2,000 minimum, of the estimated construction cost of the Public Improvements, assuming normal construction and project scheduling. Developer will provide a $2,805.40 escrow, which is separate and in addition to any other escrow funds for 10 193238v1 this Development. This amount is subject to reconciliation based on actual costs at the completion of the project. C. The Developer shall submit an escrow deposit for fees relating to City legal -related expenses associated with the Plat development. Fees for this service shall be at standard hourly rates per the City's adopted fee schedule estimated to be two percent (2.0%), or $2,000 minimum, of the estimated construction cost of the Public Improvements, assuming normal construction and project scheduling. Developer will provide a $2,805.40 escrow, which is separate and in addition to any other escrow funds for this Development. This amount is subject to reconciliation based on actual costs at the completion of the project. D. The fees owed by the Developer to the City under this Section shall be paid from the escrows amounts. Any amounts not utilized from the escrow account shall be returned to the Developer when all the Development has been completed in accordance with this Agreement. If additional escrow amounts are required for such costs incurred beyond the escrow deposit, the Developer shall be billed directly for such costs and there shall be no issuance of occupancy permits until all such obligations have been fully paid. 21. CLAIMS. In the event that the City receives claims from labor, materialmen, or others that work required by this Contract has been performed, the sums due them have not been paid, and the laborers, materialmen, or others are seeking payment from the City, the Developer hereby authorizes the City to commence an Interpleader action pursuant to Rule 22, Minnesota Rules of Civil Procedure for the District Courts, to draw upon the letters of credit in an amount up to 125 percent of the claim(s) and deposit the funds in compliance with the Rule, and upon such deposit, the Developer shall release, discharge, and dismiss the City from any further proceedings as it pertains to the letters of credit deposited with the District Court, except that the Court shall retain jurisdiction to determine attorneys' fees pursuant to this Contract. 1932380 22. STORM SEWER AREA CHARGE. The Development is subject to a total storm sewer area charge of $46,738.48. The area charge is based on the gross area of the final plat less any area credit for pond area, and is calculated as follows: BASE STORM SEWER AREA CHARGE 3.88 acres x $3,543/net acre = $13,746.84 ALTERNATE STORM SEWER ARE CHARGE3.88 acres x $8,503/net acre = $32,991.64 The total storm sewer area charge for the Development of $46,738.48 shall be apportioned to each lot of the final plat based on square footage and assessed against each property if not paid by the Developer in cash at the time of final plat approval at developer's option. If assessed, an interest rate of 1.5% per annum over the prime interest rate as published in the Wall Street Journal shall apply. [See Paragraph 30(D).] 23. SANITARY SEWER AREA CHARGE. The Development is subject to a sanitary sewer area charge of $14,590.40. The area charge is based on the gross area of the final plat and is calculated as follows: 4.4 acres x $3,316/acre = $14,590.40 The Developer shall be assessed or shall pay the sanitary sewer area charge in cash at the time of final plat approval at developer's option. The amount of the area charge shall be apportioned to each lot of the final plat based on square footage and assessed against each property if not paid by the Developer in cash at the time of final plat approval at developer's option. If assessed, an interest rate of 1.5% per annum over the prime interest rate as published in the Wall Street Journal % shall apply. [See Paragraph 30(D).] 24. WATER MAIN AREA CHARGE. The Development is subject to a water main area charge of $10,788.80. The area charge is based on the gross area of the final plat and is calculated as follows: 12 193238v1 4.4 acres x $2,452/acre = $10,788.80 The Developer shall be assessed or shall pay the sanitary sewer area charge in cash at the time of final plat approval at developer's option. The amount of the area charge shall be apportioned to each lot of the final plat based on square footage and assessed against each property if not paid by the Developer in cash at the time of final plat approval at developer's option. If assessed, an interest rate of 1.5% per annum over the prime interest rate as published in the Wall Street Journal shall apply. [See Paragraph 30(D).] 25. PARK DEDICATION AND TRAILS. Not applicable. 26. SPECIAL PROVISIONS. The following special provisions shall apply to plat development: A. Implementation of the recommendations listed in the Monticello Resolution 2017- 0, dated , 2017. G. Developer shall prepare cross -access and parking easements with maintenance, covenants and improvements to ensure continued accessibility and operation. Said easements and declarations are subject to review and approval by the City. I. Developer shall verify internal trash handling equipment, and prohibit outdoor storage as a part of the project PUD approvals. J. Developer shall coordinate addressing and mailbox installations with City Building and Streets departments. L. The Developer shall post a $2,400.00 security for the final placement of interior subdivision iron monuments at property corners. The security was calculated as follows: 8 units at 13 193238v1 $300.00 per unit. The security will be held by the City until the Developer's land surveyor certifies that all irons have been set following site grading and utility and street construction. M. The Developer is required to submit the final plat in electronic format. The electronic format shall be either AutoCAD.DWG file or a .DXF file. All construction record drawings (e.g., grading, utilities, and streets) shall be in electronic format in accordance with standard City specifications. The Developer shall also submit one complete set of reproducible construction plans on Mylar. 27. SUMMARY OF SECURITY REQUIREMENTS. A. To guarantee compliance with the terms of this Contract, payment of real estate taxes including interest and penalties, payment of special assessments, payment of the costs of all public improvements, and construction of all public improvements, the Developer shall furnish the City with a letter of credit, in the form attached hereto, from a bank ("security") for $178,337.50, plus a cash fee of $19,887.00 for City engineering, expenses and administration and planning, legal and City administration expenses. The amount of the security was calculated as follows: CONSTRUCTION COSTS: Sanitary Sewer & Watermain $140,270 Storm Sewer/Draintile/Infiltration Basin $N/A Internal Streets $N/A CONSTRUCTION SUB -TOTAL (ESTIMATED) $.00 OTHER COSTS: $ 00.00 Lot Corners/Iron Monuments $2,400.00 14 193238v1 TOTAL COSTS $142,670.00 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION SECURITIES: Total Costs X 125% $178,337.50 This breakdown is for historical reference; it is not a restriction on the use of the security. The bank shall be subject to the approval of the City Administrator. The security shall be for a term ending when maintenance bond is posted. Individual security instruments may be for shorter terms provided they are automatically renewed on an annual basis until expiration. The City may draw down the security with 30 days written notice to Developer, for any violation of the terms of this Contract or if the security is allowed to lapse prior to the end of the required term. If the required public improvements are not completed at least thirty (30) days prior to the renewal of the security, the City may also draw it down. If the security is drawn down, the proceeds shall be used to cure the default. Upon receipt of proof satisfactory to the City that work has been completed and financial obligations to the City have been satisfied, with City approval the security may be reduced from time to time by ninety percent (90%) of the financial obligations that have been satisfied. Ten percent (10%) of the amounts certified by the Developer's engineer shall be retained as security until all improvements have been completed, all financial obligations to the City satisfied, the required "as constructed" plans have been received by the City, a warranty security is provided, and the public improvements are accepted by the City Council. The City standard specifications for utilities and street construction outline procedures for security reductions. B. The Developer shall also furnish the City with a Security for $13,200.00 for grading in compliance with approved Plan `B". This amount was calculated as follows. $3,000/acre X 4.4 acres = $13,200.00 C. The Developer shall furnish the City with Security for $38,800.00 to guarantee the completion of Subject Property landscaping improvements in compliance with approved Plan "O". This 15 193238v1 amount was calculated based on the Developer's estimate of Subject Property landscaping plan installation costs. 28. SUMMARY OF CASH REQUIREMENTS. The following is a summary of the cash requirements under this Contract which must be furnished to the City prior to the time of final plat approval: Legal $ 2,805.40 Planning $ 2,805.40 Engineering Administration, Inspection $ 7,013.50 Engineering (grading) $ 3,977.56 Administrative Escrow for City Administration $ 2,805.40 GPS Locate Fee $ 480.00 Total Cash Requirements $19,887.26 * Fees reconciled to actual expenses at close of project. 29. WARRANTY. The Developer warrants all improvements required to be constructed by it pursuant to this Contract against poor material and faulty workmanship. The warranty period for underground utilities is two years and shall commence following completion and acceptance by City Council. The Developer or its Contractors shall post maintenance bonds in the amount of twenty-five percent (25%) of final certified construction costs to secure the warranties. Maintenance Bonds of the prime contractor maybe accepted subject to City approval. The City shall retain ten percent (10%) of the security posted by the Developer until the maintenance bonds are furnished the City or until the warranty period expires, whichever first occurs. The retainage may be used to pay for warranty work. 30. RESPONSIBILITY FOR COSTS. A. Except as otherwise specified herein, the Developer shall pay all actual costs incurred by it or the City in conjunction with the development of the plat, including but not limited to, legal, planning, engineering and inspection expenses incurred in connection with approval and acceptance of the plat, the preparation of this Contract, review of construction plans and documents, and all costs and 16 193238v1 expenses incurred by the City in monitoring and inspecting development of the plat. The Developer shall deposit with the City the amount set forth in Section 28 to be used for the payment of these fees and enforcement fees. If the amount in the deposit account drops below 15% of the initial amount, the Developer will make additional deposits in amounts set by the City. At the completion of the project and following payment of all expenses related to the project, the City shall return the remaining deposit funds to the Developer. B. The Developer shall hold the City and its officers, employees, and agents harmless from claims made by it and third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred resulting from plat approval and development. The Developer shall indemnify the City and its officers, employees, and agents for all costs, damages, or expenses which the City may pay or incur in consequence of such claims, including reasonable attorneys' fees and costs. C. The Developer shall reimburse the City for costs incurred in the enforcement of this Contract, including engineering and attorneys' fees. D. The Developer shall pay, or cause to be paid when due, and in any event before any penalty is attached, all special assessments referred to in this Agreement. This is an obligation of the Developer and shall continue in full force and effect even if the Developer sells a part or parts of the platted land. E. The Developer shall pay in full all bills submitted to it by the City for obligations incurred under this Contract within thirty (30) days after receipt. If the bills are not paid on time, the City may halt plat development and construction until the bills are paid in full. Bills not paid within thirty (30) days shall accrue interest at the rate of eighteen percent (18%) per year. F. In addition to the charges and special assessments referred to herein, other charges and special assessments may be imposed such as but not limited to sewer availability charges ("SAC"), 17 193238v1 water availability charges ("WAC"), City water connection charges, City sewer connection charges, and building permit fees. 31. DEVELOPER'S DEFAULT. In the event of default by the Developer as to any of the work to be performed by it hereunder, the City may, at its option, perform the work and the Developer shall promptly reimburse the City for any expense incurred by the City, provided the Developer, except in an emergency as determined by the City, is first given notice of the work in default, not less than forty- eight (48) hours in advance. This Contract is a license for the City to act, and it shall not be necessary for the City to seek a Court order for permission to enter the land. When the City does any such work, the City may, in addition to its other remedies, assess the cost in whole or in part. 32. MISCELLANEOUS. A. The Developer represents to the City that the plat complies with all city, county, metropolitan, state, and federal laws and regulations, including but not limited to: subdivision ordinances, zoning ordinances, and environmental regulations. If the plat ceases to comply with county, metropolitan, state and federal laws and regulations, the City may, at its option, refuse to allow construction or development work in the plat until the Developer does comply. Upon the City's demand, the Developer shall cease work until there is compliance. B. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City under this Contract. C. Breach of the terms of this Contract by the Developer shall be grounds for denial of building permits, including lots sold to third parties. D. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase of this Contract is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Contract. 18 193238v1 E. If building permits are issued prior to the acceptance of public improvements, the Developer assumes all liability and costs resulting in delays in completion of public improvements and damage to public improvements caused by the City, Developer, its contractors, subcontractors, material men, employees, agents, or third parties. No sewer and water connection permits may be issued and no one may occupy a building for which a building permit is issued on either a temporary or permanent basis until the streets needed for access have been paved with a bituminous surface and the utilities are accepted by the City Engineer. F. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this Contract. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Contract shall not be a waiver or release. G. This Contract shall run with the land and may be recorded against the title to the property. The Developer covenants with the City, its successors and assigns, that the Developer is well seized in fee title of the property being final platted and/or has obtained consents to this Contract, in the form attached hereto, from all parties who have an interest in the property; that there are no unrecorded interests in the property being final platted; and that the Developer will indemnify and hold the City harmless for any breach of the foregoing covenants. H. Developer or its prime contractor shall take out and maintain or cause to be taken out and maintained until six (6) month after the City has accepted the public improvements, public liability and property damage insurance covering personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage which may arise out of Developer's work or the work of its subcontractors or by one directly or indirectly employed by any of them. Limits for bodily injury and death shall be not less than $500,000 for one person and $1,000,000 for each occurrence; limits for property damage shall be not less than 19 193238v1 $200,000 for each occurrence; or a combination single limit policy of $1,000,000 or more. The City shall be named as an additional insured on the policy, and the Developer shall file with the City a certificate evidencing coverage prior to the City signing the plat or when any construction commences, whichever later occurs. The certificate shall provide that the City must be given ten (10) days advance written notice of the cancellation of the insurance. I. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in addition to every other right, power or remedy, express or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to City, at law or in equity, or under any other agreement, and each and every right, power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy. The Developer may not assign this Contract without the written permission of the City Council, unless such assignment is to a principal of Developer or another entity in which the Developer is a principal. The Developer's obligation hereunder shall continue in full force and effect even if the Developer sells part or parts of the platted land, until all conditions of assignment are met. 33. NOTICES. Required notices to the Developer shall be in writing, and shall be either hand delivered to the Developer, its employees or agents, or mailed to the Developer by certified mail at the following address: Kenneth J. and Theresa L. Spaeth, 108 Meadowlark Road SE, St. Michael, Minnesota 55376. Notices to the City shall be in writing and shall be either hand delivered to the City Administrator, or mailed to the City by certified mail in care of the City Administrator at the following address: Monticello City Hall, 505 Walnut Street, Monticello, Minnesota 55362, with a copy to the City Attorney by regular mail at: Campbell Knutson, P.A., Grand Oak Office Center I, 860 Blue Gentian Road, #290, Eagan, Minnesota 55121. 20 193238v1 Remainder of page intentionally left blank. Signatures on the following pages. 193238v1 21 CITY OF MONTICELLO Lo (SEAL) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (Ss. COUNTY OF WRIGHT ) Brian Stumpf, Mayor Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2017, by Brian Stumpf and by Jeff O'Neill, respectively the Mayor and City Administrator of the City of Monticello, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. Notary Public Campbell Knutson Professional Association Grand oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, #290 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (651) 452-5000 JJJ 22 193238v1 DEVELOPER: Kenneth J. Spaeth Theresa L. Spaeth STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF WRIGHT ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2017, by Kenneth J. Spaeth and Theresa L. Spaeth, husband and wife, Developer. Notary Public DRAFTED BY: Campbell Knutson Professional Association Grand oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, #290 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (651) 452-5000 JJJ 23 193238v1 MORTGAGE HOLDER CONSENT TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT , which holds a mortgage on the subject property, the development of which is governed by the foregoing Development Contract, which mortgage is dated and recorded with the Wright County Recorder/Registrar as document number , agrees that the Development Contract shall remain in full force and effect even if it forecloses on its mortgage. Dated this day of , 2017. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (Ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2 , by Notary Public DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL, KNUTSON Professional Association Grand Oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (651) 452-5000 JJJ 24 193238vl IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT No. Date: TO: City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street Monticello, Minnesota 55362 Dear Sir or Madam: We hereby issue, for the account of (Name of Developer) and in your favor, our Irrevocable Letter of Credit in the amount of $ , available to you by your draft drawn on sight on the undersigned bank. The draft must: a) Bear the clause, 'Drawn under Letter of Credit No. , dated 12 , of (Name of Bank) it, b) Be signed by the Mayor or City Administrator of the City of Monticello. c) Be presented for payment at (Address of Bank) . on or before 4:00 p.m. on November 30, 2007. This Letter of Credit shall automatically renew for successive one-year terms unless, at least forty-five (45) days prior to the next annual renewal date (which shall be November 30 of each year), the Bank delivers written notice to the Monticello City Administrator that it intends to modify the terms of, or cancel, this Letter of Credit. Written notice is effective if sent by certified mail, postage prepaid, and deposited in the U.S. Mail, at least forty- five (45) days prior to the next annual renewal date addressed as follows: Monticello City Administrator, Monticello City Hall, 505 Walnut Street, Monticello, MN 55362, and is actually received by the City Administrator at least thirty (30) days prior to the renewal date. This Letter of Credit sets forth in full our understanding which shall not in any way be modified, amended, amplified, or limited by reference to any document, instrument, or agreement, whether or not referred to herein. This Letter of Credit is not assignable. This is not a Notation Letter of Credit. More than one draw may be made under this Letter of Credit. This Letter of Credit shall be governed by the most recent revision of the Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits, International Chamber of Commerce Publication No. 600. We hereby agree that a draft drawn under and in compliance with this Letter of Credit shall be duly honored upon presentation. Its 25 193238v1 CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE PROJECT: CERTIFICATE HOLDER: City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street Monticello, Minnesota 55362 INSURED: ADDITIONAL INSURED: City of Monticello AGENT: WORKERS' COMPENSATION: Policy No. Effective Date: Expiration Date: Insurance Company: COVERAGE - Workers' Compensation, Statutory. GENERAL LIABILITY: Policy No. Effective Date: Expiration Date: Insurance Company: () Claims Made () Occurrence LIMITS: [Minimum] Bodily Injury and Death: $500,000 for one person $1,000,000 for each occurrence Property Damage: $200,000 for each occurrence -OR- Combination Single Limit Policy $1,000,000 or more COVERAGE PROVIDED: Operations of Contractor: YES Operations of Sub -Contractor (Contingent): YES Does Personal Injury Include Claims Related to Employment? YES 26 193238v1 Completed Operations/Products: YES Contractual Liability (Broad Form): YES Governmental Immunity is Waived: YES Property Damage Liability Includes: Damage Due to Blasting YES Damage Due to Collapse YES Damage Due to Underground Facilities YES Broad Form Property Damage YES AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY: Policy No. Effective Date: Insurance Company: (X) Any Auto LIMITS: [Minimum] Bodily Injury: $500,000 each person Property Damage: $500,000 each occurrence -OR- Combined Single Limit Policy Expiration Date: $1,000,000 each occurrence $1,000,000 each occurrence ARE ANY DEDUCTIBLES APPLICABLE TO BODILY INJURY OR PROPERTY DAMAGE ON ANY OF THE ABOVE COVERAGES: If so, list: Amount: $ [Not to exceed $1,000.00] SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL MAIL TEN (10) DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE PARTIES TO WHOM THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED. Dated at On BY: Authorized Insurance Representative 27 193238v1 Spaeth, Ken - Request for Rezoning to PUD, Development Stage PUD, & Preliminary Plat created by: city of Monticello Lot 2, Block 3 Oakwood Industrial Park 1155-018-003020 1 107 Dundas Road f % 2401 15506000,1030 —1,5 5060001'040 1.55018DD2120 ° ' 1..550.1800211 D 1 '5060001020 1.55060001050 5506000.1010 DUN D 1 155018 - ;1'S523000001'0�,.. M 550 20 1155018003,0030 LU t I Cp:r-:�1 '' A "MR 30L�EN EAGLE Lir--,.... .._ f •i , T •+ yr lJt m. arca ! 3 1 J LU D �� -j Q� 'm�^551:330165 LV Z 1~ !r Z f m 1F l: 155098000030 p C EARMSTEADsDR 7-F 415518800100101 � r + 15509300002 • t At .11 Ken Spaeth Masonry 108 Meadowlark Rd. Se. St. Michael, MN 56557 612-889-3100 05-05-2017 City of Monticello The purpose of the project is to provide individuals or small companies with a land option where they can own or lease a building that makes it affordable for their business. The project would have small lots that will allow them to construct a 4,000-6000 sq. ft. building. The goal is to provide a cost-effective option that they can have ownership while keeping their payments to 3-4000.00 per month. The clients are anticipated to be small businesses that need an office and warehouse. Could be construction related or small business. There is a very strong need for this in the Monticello area without any current options. There are not many comparables for this type project. Pfeifer property management in Buffalo has something similar and it is full. The difference is that his buildings are only available for lease. He does not offer the option of a lot sale. His tenants are plumbers, electricians, computer I.T. and other small business owners. A PUD is required, for the subject property, because the project will have a private street vs. a public street. The requirements for public street would use up too much of the property. Also, a city street is more expensive and the goal is to keep the project affordable. The project will be governed by an association agreement that lease tenants and properties that are owner occupied will have to abide by. The concept is to not have a semi -truck park, but the site is designed to accommodate limited truck traffic. We don't anticipate any loading docks. The buildings will be post -frame buildings with 2 -tone metal cladding. Any building sides facing Dundas street will have a brick or stone wainscoat up 3-4 ft. We will bring sewer and water in from Dundas with individual meters for each tenant. Storm water will be handled on site. We realize that there are townhomes to the south of the project. We have a very extensive landscape plan for this area with a berm and trees. We will also have a chain link fence across the back of the property. Around the buildings we'll have a 3 ft. wide area for landscape rock and on the street side have shrubs. All grass areas will be sodded. All landscaped areas will be irrigated. I expect the project could take 3-4 years to complete. My goal is to own 2-3 buildings myself and sell the remaining lots to owner occupied users. My intent is to provide a small business park that both the city of Monticello and myself can be proud of. Thanks for your time. Ken Spaeth I I I I DUNDAS ROAD I I _ 1 I I ' 10" D.I.P. I �� NEW ACCESS 0 ' ' =� 4 ` ' 15� R.C.P �i > DRAINAGE AND SAN MH °p '�T i NEW ACCESS o UTILITY EASEMENT SAN MH I RIM ELEV.-960.04 RIM ELEV.=961.96 I I i (TYPICAL) INV. ELEV.=942.8 INV. ELEV.=943.7 j i - (S 90000'00" E Plat) N 88036'53" E ►- " "-©- ; "� T T - -iv T T T T T 1- r20.0- + 15 b. O 300,00 T T T T T T T y / T T20` %- TEL. RISER -- •'b r `\ O �1 I � 10.0-- U TILI T 4y1 o EASEMENT o Q \ \ w III it • IN �I \ p p I \ _ 11 I DRAINAGE AND DRAINAGEAND i I r - ___- _-__ ___ -___- _ ---' __ _ . - r= -____ __ - -_ -__ E=__�=__ =- =_- ____ _ ___�_ ---- =_ =__-_ _�__. -,;1 �' I m UTILITY EASEMENT Q o° ''r S UTILITY EASEMENT (TYPICAL) I i 109 icn 1 _ (TYPICAL) f 109 cn I i I it I li O li I i1 - li ii 1 '• �O II I II ii I O 11 . I 0.01-- I �� I I ; BUILDING A �,; BUILDING BI� L0 6,9 76 SF 6,976 SF ill LOT 1 F --5.oLOT 2 III III 23,100 SF 5 0~ 23,094 SF i 6.0 1+20.0 -*1 0.53 AC -- 10. 3- r- i IIB 0 II' 0.53 AC y ? 36.0 36.0 •----LIJE } i L \'-- o I O ica II- i I I 1 cr_ I i I j co i 150.0 i 150.0 i © III i I i p i i l III I, I i r 1 II MOW I i i LINE i• ii LOT 3 -- LOT 4 ill 20,400 SF O y20i -5.0 ,390 SF I I �, � �----mow III !II 0.47 AC 5.0- 0.47 AC 1'0.0, I p LINE 10.0- BUILDING C BUILDING D II I III C° 6,9 76 SF 6,9 76 SF LI I1 ' I iII I i I I I I i I I ,WD F -NCE ;_20.0 ' -���1� 0S�\�F'+ 6.-1,'I- 0 9.9NNE 109 x35.90 109_+_41 6. . Q -- 3 6. 0__jJ A + I i I I 1., -II C) I+�20.o-I+I __ 1 -1`--------------- __'== _'___-� A TH 1 1 (\ 11 A^ L) /1 A r-\ 0 1 �: I\ 00 0 (S 90°00' 00" E Plat �--EXISTING UTILITY EASEMENT f CREATED BY THE PLAT OF N 88°36'53" E ;i OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK s ---300.00--- --- 92.13--- ♦ r/' o o \ 150.00 0 34.81 \ 150.00 - - - - - - ro N .:,___-_----DRAINAGE AND --rte ---DRAINAGE AND-- r`rj / UTILITY EASEMENT UTILITY EASEMENT _ _ 2` -i 1 —� � i \ o / I 15 51 \ �,' rn I co I c 0)1 IN^ LO I I 1 _ WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 14, T. 121, R. 25 (FOUND P.K. NAIL) N 89'14'00" E -3123.56--- — I , I 1I--�55L-- -- -- -- __Ile� i o N N \ 149.95 1 % 150.00 i N 88'36'42' E i 1 I- N 8836'42" E ,'''---- ----- DRAINAGE AND ----------- - N z UTILITY EASEMENT5 5[ Q I- I I ; C)pz I3 I o 01 I ao I o o l I M Cfl tp N INDUSTRIAL PARK VICINITY MAP SECTION 14, T. 121, R. 25, WRIGHT COUNTY, MN 0 1000 2000 3000 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 1 INCH = 1000 FEET CHELSEA RD. 4 94 � I DUNDAS RD. 3 Q � I 'Z I II I -----29--y ----34--y1 _ _ _-�5 .5L-- -- -- -- o _ 149.91 U \\ 150.00 N 88'36'42" E o N 8836'42' E i ' '`_ _ _ _ _ DRAINAGE AND --''Lo 5 5� j i o _ O) . UTILITY EASEMENT --29-_- t- 00 C'20 I I L o n2 co I I I I me° o O N`p \`� co _ �z- :21 .. o / 5 00 0o i u p I (6 I P01 SERV 0 40 80 120 ----34- ---I / / �I I ��----''__-� > DRAINAGE AND I I UTILITY EASEMENT o GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET I �_ 55 _ � - - - -- 1 /NCH = 40 FEET A.N N 149.86 + ;; --160.00 150.00 1 a I/ N 88.36'42" E I y ' • DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND N 88'36'42" E N o N N N ' ' (6 O DENOTES IRON MONUMENT SET, MARKED BY LICENSE NO. 48664 -- -- —15 5F— i DENOTES CATCH BASIN TO BE CONSTRUCTED AT LOT CORNER �I DENOTES WRIGHT COUNTY ' I 0 'a MONUMENT FOUND wo A 1 1 I I 1= � I I: I BEARING ORIENTATION: o Z nI I °0 `a 8 I THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST 7 o N N 1/4 OF SECTION 14, T. 121, R. 25 IS 00 N "' NI I o I ASSUMED TO BEAR N 89°14'00" E. �N1 I IZ I I \� 55 --- 105.65 --- - ---105.82--- - �� - - - -�- N 88736'42" E �� N 88'36'42" E \ / C I \\';=---DRAINAGE AND n UTILITY EASEMENT--_:, KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That Kenneth J. Spaeth and Theresa L. Spaeth, husband and wife, owners of the following described property situated in the County of Wright, State of Minnesota, to wit: Lot 2, Block 3, OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK, Wright County, Minnesota. Have caused the some to be surveyed and platted as SPAETH INDUSTRIAL PARK and do hereby dedicate to the public for public use the drainage and utility easements as created by this plat. In witness whereof said Kenneth J. Spaeth and Theresa L. Spaeth, husband and wife, have hereonto set their hands this day of 20 Kenneth J. Spaeth Theresa L. Spaeth STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF This instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20 , by Kenneth J. Spaeth and Theresa L. Spaeth, husband and wife. (Signature) (Name Printed) Notary Public, County, Minnesota My Commission Expires I, Abram A. Niemela, do hereby certify that this plat was prepared by me or under my direct supervision; that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor in the State of Minnesota; that this plat is a correct representation of the boundary survey; that all mathematical data and labels are correctly designated on this plat; that all monuments depicted on this plat have been, or will be correctly set within one year, that all water boundaries and wet lands, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.01, Subd. 3, as of the date of this certificate are shown and labeled on this plat; and all public ways are shown and labeled on this plat. STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF WRIGHT Dated this day of , 20 Abram A. Niemela, Licensed Land Surveyor Minnesota License No. 48664 n The foregoing Surveyor's Certificate was acknowledged before me this day of 20 by Abram A. Niemela, Land Surveyor, Minnesota License No. 48664. EAST QUARTER CORNER OF--,' -SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST SECTION 1 T. R. 25 (FOUND WRIGHT COUNN TY MONON UMENT) 1 o 1 1 1/4 OF SECTION 14, T. 121, R. 25 i o � ii N 89'14'00" E -�- ' ------ -- ��------------------ �— --- 1899.53--- -- --- -f ---- i 149.80 ! 150.01 — - • - ——,�,_—=+ — — — — — — 5. 0 (300.02 Plat) %'EXISTING UTILITY EASEMENT N 89014'00" E `-SOUTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK CREATED BY THE PLAT OF (N 89°21'11" W Plat) (DOC.# 275353) AS MONUMENTED; ALSO NORTH LINE OF THE OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK PLAT OF KLEIN FARMS ESTATES 2ND ADDITION (DOC.# 753470) C L_ L_ I I �I r n Imo) A /l F- I _-- A --- T -- I /-\I \ IVI � L_� I/-\ I L_� n I n n n � I V L/ /-\ LJ J (Signature) (Name Printed) Notary Public, County, Minnesota My Commission Expires MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION This plat of SPAETH INDUSTRIAL PARK was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, at a meeting held this day of . 20 Chairperson Secretary CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA This plat of SPAETH INDUSTRIAL PARK was approved and accepted by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, at a regular meeting thereof held this day of 20 and said plat is in compliance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.03, Subd. 2. Mayor Clerk WRIGHT COUNTY SURVEYOR I hereby certify that in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.021, Subd. 11, this plat has been reviewed and approved this day of , 20 Wright County Surveyor WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITOR Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 272.12, there are no delinquent taxes on the land hereinbefore described on this plat and transfer entered this day of , 20 By: Wright County Auditor Deputy WRIGHT COUNTY TREASURER Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.021, Subd. 9, taxes payable for the year 20 on the land hereinbefore described have been paid this day of . 20 Wright County Treasurer By: Deputy WRIGHT COUNTY RECORDER I hereby certify that this instrument was filed in the office of the County Recorder for record on this 20 at o'clock .M., and was duly recorded in Cabinet No. , Sleeve day of as Document No. Wright County Recorder KITTS -ON ROSEAU LAKE OF HE WOODS MARSHALL KOOCHICHING BELTRAMI PENNINGTON RED LAKE COOK [fi LAKE POLK ITASCA ST. LOUIS NORMAN (OMEN 7. LASS CLAY BECKER AITKIN �y GROW CARLTON OTTER TAIL :* WING PINE TODD MLLE GRAN T "OLIGLAS MOR Ri SON a ENTON {' POPE Bla'� STEARNS TONE URNS I9ANTI 1 SWIFT 'rte ANo �O � W RI G LAC HIPPE4hfA 4a'$RAMSEY QUIHENNE- PARLE ILT N WASHINGTON — , -1.1RENVILLE a 111R SOLIth Haven SQUthsidef Ineh1Laka Twp M— 44 - , ) CokatO Twp AL L IF --5tc Twrp SI®LEY LYON REDWOOD ICOLLET LE GOOl3HUE DEUR RIDE WABASHA BROWN �I HURRAY GWOOD - X11 ANN' EARTH °i� �fff� Oa0 OLMSTED O WINO NOBLES �r0 � MARTIN 1*000 -l' I POO MOWER FILLMORI, MINNESOTA Clearwater wparwazer Iwp Silver Creek Twp or nna Twp i, Maple Lake TwF Mapl e, Lake Albivii Twp Ichatham,WiTw6g:bLIA Midclleville Twp M.arysville Twp -Ve 111w ..,) fvlontrose HDvia rd; La ke Waverly —Victor,Twv Waodland�Twis I M1r�r�tic�ll�, Ta�r��:• f Al LN 13Dffialo Twp pro,St. Michael' I _ Han T� minklifivTwp, WRIGHT COUNTY SITE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT i5 � 64 00030, 4 c c' nrAnnn''In S MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA or ..4 `� ■�IfN1■I�w�MiM - SC H+ I 107 INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: CO PROJECT LOCATION PLAN C1 SITE PLAN C2 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN C3 SANITARY AND WATER UTILITY PLAN C4 STORM SEWER UTILITY PLAN C5 LANDSCAPE PLAN C6 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C7 EXISTING CONDITIONS AND REMOVALS PLAN C8 DETAILS C9 PHASING PLAN �4 W J � N 'o cC co CL o to I— z a; z w � �w �o �O oMUM CD ?a oc FAM UU Wy Q z (DCL zo � J U ct CL z 0 N 0 C) m o 0 LL, 0 Q o a v v FILE NO. 00640 co Proiect Location Plan I I ROADDUNDASI I I � 10" D.I.P. I I I I I 1 1 I I I I- II I I I I I � 15" R.C.P. I I > Q, ► o �� ► ► ► a� ► ► ► ► ; > -� QL "? SAN MH RIM ELEV.=960.04 SAN MH' BUILDING ��' 11 1p i INV. ELEV.=942.8 RIM ELEV.=961.96 SETBACK LINE + + + INV. ELEV.=943.7 I I -,, +� + + +� 30' FRONT 00' 0" E Plat) '+ + + , , ' / O \+ + + I; 7 (�! ., , _ N_88 3 53 EcD 14 -r T N�'-I- TFL RISER iV`_'`•J ' ';-�T -;T-'OT 14 150.0 150.0 7 -�- -300. 0=T__ T , T- 150.0 _T -T 1 _ --/ 20.,0-• �-- 14.b - c 20.0 i 1 �� + 16 d a -- c, }i i-6 0+u----------------------'---r--T- T � � f � f � � + +_+ I - ---------0000-- _ - i; + �Q_+ +_+ + + + ++ + `'+--�++-++ + + I+ + + + + + + + F + + + + +�+ `+ + {I + + 1+ + + + - + + + + + + +7+7 + + + I + + + + + + + + + 404+ + + + + + + + 4 + + + + 1+ + + ++ + F + + 9 + + + + 9 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + p+ + + r + + + + + + ++ o+ + +13 IT T-11 +o+ + ++ + + ++ + + +__ -I.+_- _+ T +. + + +o+ + ++�0-+ _+ + + 9.0 + + + + + + [ ++-+ + + + ++ + + + + + + + + + + + ++ + + 5 ++ + + + + + +6 + I '' ; Q / ; + +a + + + + +1 + + s+ \8 ,.+.. + � ++ + ; �3 6 m 13 +±vO v+Co o+ + + + + + + + + +�R++1w + + + + + 9.1 cr 1 1 ct _FA Q +� +, + + 11 cn, BUILDING + +1 + " ;+++I ++� 109 �, 109 + I+ +I BUILDING SETBACK LINE +I+++ +++ +'11 SETBACK LINE 15' EXISTING ++++'� F,}+J++ 1 o; 15' EXISTING INTERIOR SIDE � + 1++ +� �` + + , L� o }+1}+A � -5.0 BUILDING B � p1+++�++� �, INTERIOR SIDE 1 +}1+}+ BUILDING 6,9 76 SF 5.0� 6,976 SF 111+Ln + C T_ I + + + �1++++++;I t++�+} LOT 1 LOT 2 1.20.0+ t++►F++ 23,100 SF 23, 094 SF 11+ -6.0-? 10. + + +� ---20.0A 0.53 AC I I+ + I + 11 ;++' 0.53 AC 36.0 ,I 1-6.0+ANI 0 0 u .0006°-°-°-°-°-°-°1°,1°u°°° + + I + ;I I+ {F v o-O-o"O-ot Jquo:OvOv°u°u�o�0�0�0�0�000�000�00010 O O O O O O �%•� } 1F }II ` I U O.O_O-O-O"O`O"O.:OvOvOVOu�ODO�ODO�ODO�ODO�Ou O O O O O OI°O.. .f( +36. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 + + + + + + + + + + +1+ + + + +I +io 13 + T�� + + + + + + + + + + I+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 1 + O + +11 :+ + o + T + + + + + + + + +• + wF + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 2 + + + + + + + +11 13 W ++ +Qtr + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + - + + + + + + + + Ii m 1 1+ + + + + + 2 + + + + + + + + + + of + + + + + + + + + + 1 + + + + + + + + + + + +l I + + + + + + + T + + + + + 1 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + I,; d 1+ + + + + + + + + F + + + + + + + + + + + ..... + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +" = 14 1 ++++++++++ 150.0 +++++,++++ ++� � T+++++1+ . T d i+ { + + + + + T T + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + t + it 14 +++++++++++++�+' ++T++++ +++++++ 150.0 ++++++++++++ ;+ * + + + + + + + + + + + +++ + + + + ++ + + + + + + + ++ + + + + + + + + +;1+ + + + + + + +T4-.. + + +++ + 0''0- + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 2 + + + + + + + + + II © 1 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + o +1+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + o. + + + ++ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + �' i ++ +� . + + + + + + + + + + + + +� + + + + + {_ * }---F---r-- T- -T - f- + + + + + + + + + iw�-r + + y +0-0"0"0"0"0 ++1+ +. -T t + + + + +(I++ + y J u o 0 0 0 - o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0, 0 0.0.00 + +I +;+ } � +�$ av v u-o"O-O-O-O "O•'O"O�O�O°0°O 001000000000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o._o_O �� + +++��o°o°o°o°o°oo^000000000�0 0 0, 0 0 0 0 0 0._ o_ 0 0 ° o + + MOW _-- 1 + + + LOT 4 + + + + + 111 LOT 3 LINE ; I + �+ + 0 ,F + + 20, 400 SF 20 390 SF ++ ++ I I + + + , � + +I + 11 ;�---mow 1F +1 + � , + 1+I 1 + I+ + � 0.47 AC 0.47 AC + + + ;1 LINE 'f + I + *' O o ; + y --5.o BUILDING D + �; + + + �I 1 +I + BUILDING C+ + Q0 i + + + ;� 5.0-- F 6,9 76 SF + + ++++++11 6 976 SF ill+ +I -FI + „ 1 1 + 4 + 14 M+ +1 + 11 ; 1--=20.0-*' 1 i*+ 4(t) F -NCE ++ s.oF-+7 Q y' 9.9 IM` �. W 0 109-j5 + + 11 w +, + n7E 109 1 35.9 + 11 Q 0.0 + + +11 -� X6.0 + p - '. 6.0 • J�' I l� �• ° : I + + + + +I 20.0 - �-�'• f'_7 + + + + + + +// Q�\j\+ + + + + + + + +� + 1 +;; o + + +7�' + + + I + + + +� + + .. . . + + + + + + � l! � + � r - -+ + + I I 1+ 1 li wCC) ;+ + 1� �,F + + + +� CJ �r + + + N +�+, + + + + + + + + + ��+ + 6 3 3 ' + +11 O ; + + + f + + I �i \ 6 + + 3 0- o + + + + + + + + + + j + + + + + + ^ 1+ + + + + + + h + r -0 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + - + + + + +11 I + + + + 5 + + + 9+0 � + + + + + + + + + + + +I + + +1 + I+ + + , �cot + + O I l 1 + + + + + + + �+ + + +� + + + + + + + + .} .' - 1_- - T �- + + + ) + + + O co �}- 1+ +oo+�++ +;Q3++++++1+++ +--+ +++N F ++. ++ +_ 1 }+}+}++ 7 F+++++++ , ++++ ++++++ �p ++ 00 Mid +��+++0+++7+ 9 150.0 F�+o++ ++ ++++++++ �g �` 1 I� 14d O d _ � I+ + + + + + + + + + �- + i T + + + + + + + +-p+ + + a o 1 + n O -O ° 0 14 i1 1 T T + +'+ + + + + + + KI + + +T+ + 9 150.0 7 + + + + + + o+ + +apt + r� I I 1 I I I I I I I I J� O F + + + + T7++ + + + 'b•+ + + + + +-+ + + + + +++ + + + + + + IF + ++ + + + + + + + + + + + + + +ir + + I .-� - CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER I+ Q + a1 1 T + + + + + + + + + + + + + ++ '� +! + + F ++ + + + F + + + + 5.1 FT. EAST OF LOT LINE + + + + + +' j + + ++ + + + + + + + 126 [F + 1 + F 3 + �� +1 + A +1 0 d + + F 8 �. + + 1-1 �I I I 1F ++ +� '- - + +I + ++ +11 f 109 �' + I+ f +1 + 109 + + + CHAINLINK ++1+++ o +++++_1 O c0 00 � FENCE + \- 1 + + + + + fi1 I 0 O ON LOT LINE. O 1+ ++ +++r�++';I 1 ) O o --5.0 BUILDING F + 1+ +11 ++; ++ BUILDING E F+ + + II + +II ++ ++ 6, 976 SF 5.0� 6,9 76 SF �+ + + ;; O + {IF + LOT 5 LOT 6+ + + I, 1++IF++ 20,384 SF 26'0 20.0 20, 400 SF 0.47 AC ~ 9.9 1 35.9�- I -t-1++ 0.47 AC _ + + 1i 6'0+ + o•o o'o 0 0�0°0"o e°s.� o`°'O�° ° ou00000000000000000000°0°0 0 0 0 0 0_0_0 + + + i O-O-O-O-O-O`O"O " O"O�0"0"606"606081808 . O_o_° 1+ �O O O O o o° />T --T ++ _i44 -36.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0_0.0_ °T + `� + 1� + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +�cP +ii 1+ { + p +I + + + _�__+ __+ -� I I Y:P - . + + + '+ + + + + + + + + 1 + 1 + + + + + T + / ,�-, \� + + + + + +;; 0 1 + + Q�•+ + + + + + + + + + + + 0 + + + + . + + + + + + + + + + + + + ` L J+ + + + + + + :++I + �+ + + + +0+ + + + + + + + + + O- + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +' + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + T + + + + + + + + + + + + 1 + + + + + + + + + + + + + 1+ + + + + + + + + + + + + ... + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 11 d +++++++++++ 150.0++++++++ ++++++++++++++++++� 14 I+ + + + + + + + + + + + . + + + + + + 1 ' , T T T + + + + + + + + + + + it + II,iI - I + I a T T T + + + + +I + + + + " + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 1f1 d 14 ;+ +, +"+ + + + + + +' +' + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + . 150.0 . + + + + + + + + + + + +;I + + + + + + + + + + + + a 1 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + �, BUILDING ++ ++++++++++++++++++++++ T ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 ++++++++++++}.a + BUILDING ! } } } } } } } } 2 } } } } } } } } } } } } } } } } } } } } } } } } } + , } } } } } } �. }I SETBACK LINE SETBACK LINE '; + + -p + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +0 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + _ ; I 1 + + +1 µ +, + 0' + + + + + + + + + + + +4 -�- F- �- + + T + + + + + + + + + + t ��,-�-O-a r +1 + ;; ° 15' EXISTING o y v u u° -O -O -O -O -O O O•'O O A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • T� 1+ +�F--�--t + + + + + +� -t ✓u-�-o--'o, "�"0�0�0�0"0=0t o, o�O�O�0�0�0�O�0o000,,o O O�O,,,O„O.,O.O.o_o_r+ + +� 15 EXISTING ;� + + + a� °o°o°o°o°o°o°°° ° ° ° 0-0-0-0 ° ° O_o_°_° ;_ + + INTERIOR SIDE INTERIOR SIDE ;F +I + I LOT 7 LOT 8 + + + it 31,605 SF+i 1! I t++ 1 + A 1 31,398 SF " t+ + 0.73 AC +++ +'+ 1 0.72 AC I + + "ji + + 11 } } + + } BUILDING G y --5.0 BUILDING H `� +' k + + A 6, 9 76 SF , ;►I + ,F 1+ I~ + 11R i 6,976 SF 5.0-- l ,I+ + + 5.2 +\- { + + +� I r �'r+ + + IF + +i-- CHAINLINK :++V ++ 1 j i1,+++ ++Ico FENCE + �- I + + + J 1 r a + +I I r �,�-20.0 0.5 FT. WEST LO I+ + 14 C, 1 f �1 + IF +I N OF LOT LINE. oo . ++t++ 4 ' 109 109 9.8 +L+ ; O ; +I+-110.0 4I J1 35.8 N i++ 36.0+-- i 4� �' • ' �, - �: ° r e .. rc I +++ I ++i o --2101.0 , _ _ + + +a"+i`+�+'I lF + + + + + + + + + + + + + + I + 1 ++ I+++ � ;1 , + + + + + + +,V +(,in+ + 4 +I + + + + + + + + + + + 1 +1 It 0 0 + + - + + + + + + \ 6 3 - + + -6.0 x-6.0 + + f® + 16 3 + +a + + + + + + + + + + + 5 + + + �1 + + + h 0 + + + o� +111 5 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + I' + + +� 'A,� 0 + + I' + + R�� + + + + + IF + + + + + + + i + + + + + + + + + + + be + + + + + + ;; I 1 2 \f + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +�+ + + + + + + + 7 + + + + +�+ + + + + + + 0 + + + + + +, 13 + + + 7 + + + + + + N + + + 1 + r + + + + + + + + + + l y; I + + + + + + + + +? + + + + + r + + + + 9 +++ 7 4 + + ... + + + + ; +�+ 4 + + + - + +__+_ ±+_O___E +.j + -` 1 1 1 + T - f-""�- + + + + + + + + + + fes' ------- \y + + + + +---+--- - f --T - T + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + , + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + f t--------- --*---�--f= t== __ _= Y == --------------- - -- �o 12 �-__-.�--L---1-_-�-- -- -- 00 00-__:.___::__:: __= ---------- .11 000-0000-- •o .11 - \i o LANDSCAPE - - -- --- ;� EDGING/MULCH - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ; % --CHAINLINK CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER + \- I STORM WATER 1 5.8 FT. EAST OF LOT LINE 1 o MANAGEMENT BASIN � L -w -r- ' 1 0 o ,-- SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER +�- I�--,. - 5� - - 15�- - - 1/4 OF SECTION 14, T. 121, R. 25 0.4 FT. WEST OF LOT CORNER _--\\ 1� =�- - - - - - - - - - - _ _ " N 89°14'00" E \ \ ` EASE _N \`� i --- 150.0 _ -t--0000-- _ -- ----- ------ - N 89°14 00 ` --------------------0000-- -- 149.8 -0- ---� 1899 53 0000- ----- -- ------3123.56----- ----�, . --- o 0000- 99.81 N °14'00" E - 0000 _ I >Oou° -_--> -----------0000-- - - �V - - - - 0 ° ,°°o°°°�° °a°\ °° MOW °° °d°°°°OO66, °° SHE C0LINE 13' cP - 13 13 SI " 13 �0 13 13 -CURB 13 13 13 --LANDSCAPE 13 �% ° 13 , STOP (N 89 ti , 1 1 W Plat ; RISER EDGING/MULCH LANDSCAPE -= ' ��'-- - CB � \ G OLDEN EAGLE ROAD - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ EDGING/ROCK BUILDING - ELEV.=9.16- - \�'-=SOUTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL 8c SHRUBS SETBACK LINE PARK (DOC.# 275353) AS MONUMENTED; ALSO NORTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF KLEIN FARMS I I 1 15' REAR %� 1 ESTATES 2ND ADDITION (DOC.# 753470) 1 1 1 F-- - -- ------ F -- - - - - -I - I 1 A A H r� _T_ A I_T_ F__ I F-"\ n F--'\ F'i I_T_ I /-`\ N i I PROJECT LOCATION PART OF THE SWj AND NE4, SECTION 14 TOWNSHIP 121, RANGE 25, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA. EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 2, BLOCK 3, OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA. LEGEND: SITE PLAN NOTES: 1. ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO FACE OF CURB, EDGE OF SIDEWALK OR EXTERIOR OF BUILDING UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR LOCATION OF EXITS, RAMPS, CONCRETE APRONS AND STOOPS. 2. TACK SHALL BE USED ON BITUMINOUS EDGE PRIOR TO PATCHING. MATCH EXISTING GRADES. 3. ALL CONCRETE SIDEWALKS ADJACENT TO BUILDING SHALL BE SEPARATED WITH A 2" EXPANSION JOINT. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL CONDUIT REQUIREMENTS FOR SITE LIGHTING, COMMUNICATION, SPRINKLER, ETC WITH OWNER PRIOR TO PAVING. 5. ACCESSIBLE ROUTE SHALL BE PROVIDED FROM ACCESSIBLE STALLS TO BUILDING ENTRANCE (SEE ADAAG REQUIREMENTS). POLE MOUNT APPROVED SIGNS CENTERED ON STALLS. PAINT INTERNATIONAL SYMBOL OF ACCESSIBILITY ON STALL. 6. CONSTRUCT ACCESSIBLE PEDESTRIAN RAMP PER ADAAG AND MNDOT STANDARDS INCLUDING CONTRASTING DETECTABLE WARNING METAL TRUNCATED DOME PANELS. 7. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING WITH FIRE MARSHAL FOR POSTING OF FIRE LANES, CURB MARKING AND SIGNAGE IF NEEDED. 8. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR DEMOLITION AND REMOVAL OF ALL EXISTING SITE FEATURES THAT INTERFERE WITH NEW WORK AS SHOWN. 9. ALL NEW UTILITIES MUST BE UNDERGROUND. COORDINATE LOCATIONS WITH LOCAL UTILITY COMPANIES. 10.SIDEWALKS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH CROSS SLOPE OF 1.5% WITH ADJUSTMENT +/- 0.5%. SIDEWALKS WILL BE INSPECTED AFTER CONSTRUCTION. ANY SIDEWALK EXCEEDING 2.0% CROSS SLOPE WILL NEED TO BE REPLACED AT CONTRACTORS EXPENSE. GENERAL NOTES: 1. PRIOR TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THAT ALL REQUIRED PERMITS AND APPROVALS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED. NO CONSTRUCTION OR FABRICATION SHALL BEGIN UNTIL THE CONTRACTOR HAS THOROUGHLY REVIEWED ALL PLANS AND OTHER DOCUMENTS APPROVED BY THE PERMITTING AUTHORITIES. 2. WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND THE REQUIREMENTS AND STANDARDS OF THE LOCAL GOVERNING AUTHORITY. THE SOILS REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION SET FORTH THEREIN ARE A PART OF THE REQUIRED CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AND IN CASE OF CONFLICT SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE UNLESS SPECIFICALLY NOTED OTHERWISE ON THE PLANS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER OF ANY DISCREPANCY BETWEEN SOILS REPORT AND PLANS. 3. SITE CLEARING SHALL INCLUDE THE LOCATION AND REMOVAL OF ALL UNDERGROUND PIPING, VALVING, ETC. 4. SITE GRADING SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THESE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND THE RECOMMENDATIONS SET FORTH IN THE SOILS REPORT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVING AND REPLACING ALL SOFT, YIELDING OR UNSUITABLE MATERIALS AND REPLACING WITH SUITABLE MATERIALS AS SPECIFIED. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT A COMPACTION REPORT PREPARED BY A QUALIFIED SOILS ENGINEER, LICENSED WITHIN THE STATE WHERE THE WORK IS PERFORMED, VERIFYING THAT ALL FILLED AREAS AND SUBGRADE AREAS WITHIN THE BUILDING PAD AND PAVEMENT AREAS HAVE BEEN COMPACTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SET FORTH IN THE SOILS REPORT. 5. THE LOCATIONS OF THE UNDERGROUND FACILITIES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE BASED ON FIELD SURVEYS AND LOCAL UTILITY COMPANY RECORDS. IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTACT THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES TO LOCATE THEIR FACILITIES PRIOR TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION. NO ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION SHALL BE PAID TO THE CONTRACTOR FOR DAMAGE AND REPAIR TO THESE FACILITIES CAUSED BY HIS WORK FORCE. 6. ALL EXISTING DIMENSIONS AND GRADES SHOWN ON THE PLANS SHALL BE FIELD VERIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY CONSTRUCTION MANAGER IF ANY DISCREPANCIES EXIST PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION FOR NECESSARY PLAN OR GRADE CHANGES. NO EXTRA COMPENSATION SHALL BE PAID TO THE CONTRACTOR FOR WORK HAVING TO BE REDONE DUE TO DIMENSIONS OR GRADES SHOWN INCORRECTLY ON THESE PLANS IF SUCH NOTIFICATION HAS NOT BEEN GIVEN. 0 30 60 90 � I � r i GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET SURVEY DATA SURVEY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY: MEYER ROHLIN LAND SERVICES 708 1st AVENUE NE BUFFALO, MN 55313 DATED: APRIL 18, 2017 BENCHMARK: MN/DOT GEODETIC MONUMENT "8605 S" ELEVATION = 966.55 NAVD88 DATUM SITE DATA: EXISTING ZONING: 1-2 HEAVY INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT PROPOSED ZONING: PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT EXISTING PID: 155-018-003020 EXISTING LOT AREA: LOT 11: 190,770 SF = 4.38 ACRES PROPOSED BUILDING AREAS: �4 64109 BUILDING 6,976 SF x 8 = 55,808 SF X EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA 2,822 SF = 0.06 ACRES PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA 150,032 SF = 3.44 ACRES >> 78.27. CL V W 001NET IMPERVIOUS AREA INCREASE 147,210 SF = 3.38 ACRES J N O co PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA 41,800 SF = 0.96 ACRES >> 21.8% Q co man a 03 to W DISTURBANCE AREA 200,441 SF = 4.60 ACRES X L 0 W ft PARKING DATA: W _ g REQUIRED PARKING STALLS: Z W C Q [zLij OFFICE @ 1 /200sf; 10% x 55,808 sf / 200 = 28 SPACES > WAREHOUSE @ 1 /2,000sf; 90% x 55,808 sf / 2,000 = 25 SPACES 0 Total= 53 SPACES O Za:man" �o PROVIDED PARKING STALLS: a. 00 9' x 20' SPACES = 90 SPACES (INCL 8 HC SPACES) r O 12 waft SETBACK: 1-2 MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS W Lu m"^ LOCATION: BUILDING PARKING ''� v, FRONT EXISTING 30 6 Q STREET SIDE EXISTING 30 6 INTERIOR SIDE EXISTING 15 6 co INTERIOR SIDE PROPOSED 0 0 REAR YARD EXISTING 15 6 a o KEY NOTES: ° 0q) q) O BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT; SEE SECTION ON DETAIL SHEET ° -c I ,, Lo o E 0 Lo O CONCRETE PAVEMENT HEAVY DUTY, WIDTH VARIES. 6" CONCRETE 0 2 I o "O c W/6 X6#�#10/10 W.W.M. CONST. JTS @ 12 O.C.) OVER 4 CLASS 5 AGGREGATE c BASE. MnC�'OT 2461 MIX 3Y22A SLIPFORM PLACEMENT OR MnDOT 2461 MIX 3Y32A o A I CO o on m.°' MANUAL PLACEMENT. y o W •� L O O W U O U 3 CONCRETE PAVEMENT LIGHT DUTY, MIN. 5 FT WIDTH. 4" CONCRETE o ` � cw° CL O W 6"X6"- 10 10 W.W.M. (CONST. JTS 6' 0. . SEE SECTION ON SHEET 4.0. a c a `� I o / # (C @ C C C a 100 0 MnDOT 2461 IX 3Y22A SLIPFORM PLACEMENT OR MnDOT 2461 MIX 3Y32A 42 o o P r -U I - c MANUAL PLACEMENT. INTEGRAL SIDEWALK WITH THICKENED EDGE CURB FACE IS AN '� ° ac, v, �, a - ACCEPTABLE OPTION. ;, o ' OD412 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER �N' 3 ° r- MIX 3Y22A FOR MACHINE PLACEMENT (MnDOT 2461) e 0 m MIX 3Y32A FOR MANUAL PLACEMENT (MnDOT 2461) O D612 CONCRETE CURB WITH TIP -OUT GUTTER � a o MIX 3Y22A FOR MACHINE PLACEMENT (MnDOT 2461) MIX 3Y32A FOR MANUAL PLACEMENT MnDOT 2461) 3 � a NOT APPLICABLE WHEN INTEGRAL SIDEWALK WITH THICKENED EDGE CURB FACE IS TO BE CONSTRUCTED. PED. RAMP - IN ACCORDANCE WITH AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT & MnDOT O6 STANDARD PLAN 5-297.250 INCLUDING CONTRASTING DETECTABLE WARNING DEVICES. DEPRESS BACK OF CURB AT RAMP. O PAINT INTERNATIONAL SYMBOL OF ACCESSABILITY WITH WHITE LATEX PAINT. OACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN (MnDOT NOS. R7 -8A & R7-813). CENTER SIGN ON O PARKING STALL. LOCATION PER GENERAL CONTRACTOR. MOUNT ON STEEL CHANNEL POST. O PAINT 4" SOLID STRIPE - WHITE LATEX PAINT. 10 EXISTING PAVEMENT TO REMAIN. O11 EXISTING DRIVEWAY ACCESS AND CULVERT TO BE REMOVED. RESTORE GRADES TO MATCH EXISTING ROADSIDE DITCH. 12 EXISTING ADJACENT OWNERS FENCE TO REMAIN IN PLACE. 13 EXISTING ADJACENT PROPERTY TREES/SHRUBS TO REMAIN IN PLACE. 14 DIRECTIONAL TRAFFIC SIGN ON STEEL CHANNEL POST a STOP b DO NOT ENTER O c DO NOT EXIT d ONE WAY (WITH LEFT ARROW) 15 FENCE, CHAINLINK, 6.0 FT HEIGHT, INSTALL AT 1.0 FT FROM PROPERTY LINE V) 0 0 0o W W Q � v 0 a v INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: o CO PROJECT LOCATION PLAN C1 SITE PLAN C2 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN C3 SANITARY AND WATER UTILITY PLAN C4 STORM SEWER UTILITY PLAN C5 LANDSCAPE PLAN C6 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C7 EXISTING CONDITIONS AND REMOVALS PLAN C8 DETAILS C9 PHASING PLAN FILE NO. 00633 C1 Site Plan EXISTING BOUNDARY BUILDING SETBACK LINE - - - -- PROPOSED LOT LINE PROPOSED FENCE ------------------------------ PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER -=-=-=-=-=-=-= --= PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER TIP -OUT FLOWLINE ® PROPOSED PARKING STALLS .............:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:al PROPOSED BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT ° °-°-°-°-°-°-°-°-°-°-°0000-° °°°°°°°°°°°°°° 00000000000000000000000000000 PROPOSED HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT o°o°o°o°o°o°o°o°o°o°o°o°o°o°o s PROPOSED LIGHT DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT SITE PLAN NOTES: 1. ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO FACE OF CURB, EDGE OF SIDEWALK OR EXTERIOR OF BUILDING UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR LOCATION OF EXITS, RAMPS, CONCRETE APRONS AND STOOPS. 2. TACK SHALL BE USED ON BITUMINOUS EDGE PRIOR TO PATCHING. MATCH EXISTING GRADES. 3. ALL CONCRETE SIDEWALKS ADJACENT TO BUILDING SHALL BE SEPARATED WITH A 2" EXPANSION JOINT. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL CONDUIT REQUIREMENTS FOR SITE LIGHTING, COMMUNICATION, SPRINKLER, ETC WITH OWNER PRIOR TO PAVING. 5. ACCESSIBLE ROUTE SHALL BE PROVIDED FROM ACCESSIBLE STALLS TO BUILDING ENTRANCE (SEE ADAAG REQUIREMENTS). POLE MOUNT APPROVED SIGNS CENTERED ON STALLS. PAINT INTERNATIONAL SYMBOL OF ACCESSIBILITY ON STALL. 6. CONSTRUCT ACCESSIBLE PEDESTRIAN RAMP PER ADAAG AND MNDOT STANDARDS INCLUDING CONTRASTING DETECTABLE WARNING METAL TRUNCATED DOME PANELS. 7. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING WITH FIRE MARSHAL FOR POSTING OF FIRE LANES, CURB MARKING AND SIGNAGE IF NEEDED. 8. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR DEMOLITION AND REMOVAL OF ALL EXISTING SITE FEATURES THAT INTERFERE WITH NEW WORK AS SHOWN. 9. ALL NEW UTILITIES MUST BE UNDERGROUND. COORDINATE LOCATIONS WITH LOCAL UTILITY COMPANIES. 10.SIDEWALKS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH CROSS SLOPE OF 1.5% WITH ADJUSTMENT +/- 0.5%. SIDEWALKS WILL BE INSPECTED AFTER CONSTRUCTION. ANY SIDEWALK EXCEEDING 2.0% CROSS SLOPE WILL NEED TO BE REPLACED AT CONTRACTORS EXPENSE. GENERAL NOTES: 1. PRIOR TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THAT ALL REQUIRED PERMITS AND APPROVALS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED. NO CONSTRUCTION OR FABRICATION SHALL BEGIN UNTIL THE CONTRACTOR HAS THOROUGHLY REVIEWED ALL PLANS AND OTHER DOCUMENTS APPROVED BY THE PERMITTING AUTHORITIES. 2. WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND THE REQUIREMENTS AND STANDARDS OF THE LOCAL GOVERNING AUTHORITY. THE SOILS REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION SET FORTH THEREIN ARE A PART OF THE REQUIRED CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AND IN CASE OF CONFLICT SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE UNLESS SPECIFICALLY NOTED OTHERWISE ON THE PLANS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER OF ANY DISCREPANCY BETWEEN SOILS REPORT AND PLANS. 3. SITE CLEARING SHALL INCLUDE THE LOCATION AND REMOVAL OF ALL UNDERGROUND PIPING, VALVING, ETC. 4. SITE GRADING SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THESE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND THE RECOMMENDATIONS SET FORTH IN THE SOILS REPORT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVING AND REPLACING ALL SOFT, YIELDING OR UNSUITABLE MATERIALS AND REPLACING WITH SUITABLE MATERIALS AS SPECIFIED. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT A COMPACTION REPORT PREPARED BY A QUALIFIED SOILS ENGINEER, LICENSED WITHIN THE STATE WHERE THE WORK IS PERFORMED, VERIFYING THAT ALL FILLED AREAS AND SUBGRADE AREAS WITHIN THE BUILDING PAD AND PAVEMENT AREAS HAVE BEEN COMPACTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SET FORTH IN THE SOILS REPORT. 5. THE LOCATIONS OF THE UNDERGROUND FACILITIES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE BASED ON FIELD SURVEYS AND LOCAL UTILITY COMPANY RECORDS. IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTACT THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES TO LOCATE THEIR FACILITIES PRIOR TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION. NO ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION SHALL BE PAID TO THE CONTRACTOR FOR DAMAGE AND REPAIR TO THESE FACILITIES CAUSED BY HIS WORK FORCE. 6. ALL EXISTING DIMENSIONS AND GRADES SHOWN ON THE PLANS SHALL BE FIELD VERIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY CONSTRUCTION MANAGER IF ANY DISCREPANCIES EXIST PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION FOR NECESSARY PLAN OR GRADE CHANGES. NO EXTRA COMPENSATION SHALL BE PAID TO THE CONTRACTOR FOR WORK HAVING TO BE REDONE DUE TO DIMENSIONS OR GRADES SHOWN INCORRECTLY ON THESE PLANS IF SUCH NOTIFICATION HAS NOT BEEN GIVEN. 0 30 60 90 � I � r i GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET SURVEY DATA SURVEY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY: MEYER ROHLIN LAND SERVICES 708 1st AVENUE NE BUFFALO, MN 55313 DATED: APRIL 18, 2017 BENCHMARK: MN/DOT GEODETIC MONUMENT "8605 S" ELEVATION = 966.55 NAVD88 DATUM SITE DATA: EXISTING ZONING: 1-2 HEAVY INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT PROPOSED ZONING: PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT EXISTING PID: 155-018-003020 EXISTING LOT AREA: LOT 11: 190,770 SF = 4.38 ACRES PROPOSED BUILDING AREAS: �4 64109 BUILDING 6,976 SF x 8 = 55,808 SF X EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA 2,822 SF = 0.06 ACRES PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA 150,032 SF = 3.44 ACRES >> 78.27. CL V W 001NET IMPERVIOUS AREA INCREASE 147,210 SF = 3.38 ACRES J N O co PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA 41,800 SF = 0.96 ACRES >> 21.8% Q co man a 03 to W DISTURBANCE AREA 200,441 SF = 4.60 ACRES X L 0 W ft PARKING DATA: W _ g REQUIRED PARKING STALLS: Z W C Q [zLij OFFICE @ 1 /200sf; 10% x 55,808 sf / 200 = 28 SPACES > WAREHOUSE @ 1 /2,000sf; 90% x 55,808 sf / 2,000 = 25 SPACES 0 Total= 53 SPACES O Za:man" �o PROVIDED PARKING STALLS: a. 00 9' x 20' SPACES = 90 SPACES (INCL 8 HC SPACES) r O 12 waft SETBACK: 1-2 MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS W Lu m"^ LOCATION: BUILDING PARKING ''� v, FRONT EXISTING 30 6 Q STREET SIDE EXISTING 30 6 INTERIOR SIDE EXISTING 15 6 co INTERIOR SIDE PROPOSED 0 0 REAR YARD EXISTING 15 6 a o KEY NOTES: ° 0q) q) O BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT; SEE SECTION ON DETAIL SHEET ° -c I ,, Lo o E 0 Lo O CONCRETE PAVEMENT HEAVY DUTY, WIDTH VARIES. 6" CONCRETE 0 2 I o "O c W/6 X6#�#10/10 W.W.M. CONST. JTS @ 12 O.C.) OVER 4 CLASS 5 AGGREGATE c BASE. MnC�'OT 2461 MIX 3Y22A SLIPFORM PLACEMENT OR MnDOT 2461 MIX 3Y32A o A I CO o on m.°' MANUAL PLACEMENT. y o W •� L O O W U O U 3 CONCRETE PAVEMENT LIGHT DUTY, MIN. 5 FT WIDTH. 4" CONCRETE o ` � cw° CL O W 6"X6"- 10 10 W.W.M. (CONST. JTS 6' 0. . SEE SECTION ON SHEET 4.0. a c a `� I o / # (C @ C C C a 100 0 MnDOT 2461 IX 3Y22A SLIPFORM PLACEMENT OR MnDOT 2461 MIX 3Y32A 42 o o P r -U I - c MANUAL PLACEMENT. INTEGRAL SIDEWALK WITH THICKENED EDGE CURB FACE IS AN '� ° ac, v, �, a - ACCEPTABLE OPTION. ;, o ' OD412 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER �N' 3 ° r- MIX 3Y22A FOR MACHINE PLACEMENT (MnDOT 2461) e 0 m MIX 3Y32A FOR MANUAL PLACEMENT (MnDOT 2461) O D612 CONCRETE CURB WITH TIP -OUT GUTTER � a o MIX 3Y22A FOR MACHINE PLACEMENT (MnDOT 2461) MIX 3Y32A FOR MANUAL PLACEMENT MnDOT 2461) 3 � a NOT APPLICABLE WHEN INTEGRAL SIDEWALK WITH THICKENED EDGE CURB FACE IS TO BE CONSTRUCTED. PED. RAMP - IN ACCORDANCE WITH AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT & MnDOT O6 STANDARD PLAN 5-297.250 INCLUDING CONTRASTING DETECTABLE WARNING DEVICES. DEPRESS BACK OF CURB AT RAMP. O PAINT INTERNATIONAL SYMBOL OF ACCESSABILITY WITH WHITE LATEX PAINT. OACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN (MnDOT NOS. R7 -8A & R7-813). CENTER SIGN ON O PARKING STALL. LOCATION PER GENERAL CONTRACTOR. MOUNT ON STEEL CHANNEL POST. O PAINT 4" SOLID STRIPE - WHITE LATEX PAINT. 10 EXISTING PAVEMENT TO REMAIN. O11 EXISTING DRIVEWAY ACCESS AND CULVERT TO BE REMOVED. RESTORE GRADES TO MATCH EXISTING ROADSIDE DITCH. 12 EXISTING ADJACENT OWNERS FENCE TO REMAIN IN PLACE. 13 EXISTING ADJACENT PROPERTY TREES/SHRUBS TO REMAIN IN PLACE. 14 DIRECTIONAL TRAFFIC SIGN ON STEEL CHANNEL POST a STOP b DO NOT ENTER O c DO NOT EXIT d ONE WAY (WITH LEFT ARROW) 15 FENCE, CHAINLINK, 6.0 FT HEIGHT, INSTALL AT 1.0 FT FROM PROPERTY LINE V) 0 0 0o W W Q � v 0 a v INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: o CO PROJECT LOCATION PLAN C1 SITE PLAN C2 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN C3 SANITARY AND WATER UTILITY PLAN C4 STORM SEWER UTILITY PLAN C5 LANDSCAPE PLAN C6 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C7 EXISTING CONDITIONS AND REMOVALS PLAN C8 DETAILS C9 PHASING PLAN FILE NO. 00633 C1 Site Plan I I REGRADE DITCH; COORDINATE h O�^� WITH VENDOR UTILITY �h� RE -GRADE DITCH; DAYLIGHT PROVIDERS FOR RELOCATION )( DITCH FLOWLINE TO DRAIN; RCADOF UTILITIES \ COORDINATE WITH VENDOR 10" D.I.P. ' ' UTILITY PROVIDERS FOR i i r i RELOCATION OF UTILITIES " �7 \ �j 15 e 1< / 1 ���� / 0, "? �N MH o �; ► ► n I I- � FES -F I ,g6G FES -E )4 I SAN Mh' I • I h1'' o. `96o IE=958.50 960.0" i ° 959.9 IN IE=958.00 6 I FES -H '\ RIM ELE IE=959.70 co'`� J I ;0 96 1 FES -G QRn 56 -co,�� 6'-°' - -- ---= 3�= 9so4''�, ; -��p - - FESQliQ A7Q I / INV. ELLv.=y,,ri.i :(�' a, �'• IE=959.50 - CB -8 �I -� )( 960 =� _;` " *9 9--� �;* I / RE=961.10 (- _ _ x�;�o »-, »-�� _ X IE=958.00 I JI X ), uaSQ 3 +' ��.- » 959.7. T 959T2X IE=957.70 v 960 V T-,,°�'-�o, / -eg� RISER- - - 960.6 Xj �o� -T �; - - -. .. 960 T.� , x� 9F 0 - - - - - - - _� o r' ----------- --= ----------- yb 1--7--`�(- -,^-_ -IT»_ `9 - 962 ' 961 - t- - - - - - z - - ------ ,----tom`----1-' ---- - - --------- 0.- -■ ■ ■ CB -9 -t 3% - 962 - - mo---- �,q p �! QF1 F rea_ m,vX----rn----� �o�b1.5 e o -C -1 9 RE=961.20-�e -- - d'-- -- Y.��- - `�_'= e,------- ----=`6 sq`' o �' I' IE=958.00 P, �1 •'°�6 00� �(. ; �.4 ?° b' - , -9&2\ I 10 jI RE=961.20 I I l } 9 �p IE=956.50 IN l� r�� N g62 or�A IM o,�,'P °e - -oti l �- > IE=958.00 OUT --- - - - I I -g �2 gFWEASE}o�V 77962 ------ -- -- �- -- _o ,�", \. > �.- 'f? oo'►' _ _ - - r , '\ ofvry° ' � X 963.0 >C 962.9 x a63.'�_ _, \ `2.5% ' O I Q I�• �e'' 1 M7, I I I \n .lI 6 21I I X962.8x ( 096J96j.-- w ---- ---- -- `O ��------------------•-------- ----- -------- 0) 963 - - cr_ I II I'' I 109 109 Il I II I l 4P II ; 11 g .2 ' g , r !0z.o% 11 X 9 62.2 l I g621g1 \\ +i I UNDERGROUND w 11 e�tiIepl i / oEv BUILDING B I I 1 \61 SYSTEM �I BUILDING A 962 ;! X NWL = 958.00 \ i 9 2.5 I i 6,9 76 SF 6, 9 76 SF I I I 12 YR = 958.59 963.1 X) O 11 I II CB -16- I \\ 10 YR = 959.34 '-•2 11 I I RE=962.50I ; 100 YR = 960.73 FFE=963.50 IE=959.00 FFE=963.50 • I I lo,�� I SEE DETAIL THIS _ t o 6` 3 SHEET \ X 961.9 I I eee I 1 962.0 ! \ \ 3. \ �� u v-o"O-O'O"O"O"O O"'O"'O O O O„O_O_O 0 0 0 ° , �'o a �- 1 , o= o- O- a a O a O °oao boa„°„a O a O a O a •----------------------------- -- 7� --L1ME • - + I� - -°'6 I------- - - Io 0 la 1 963.7X X I I CO 1 / ----- 96�-.-.-�.-.-. -�-fir I �^ o �6� °e I m CB -2 963.7 9 6.5 �I �' I / . - . - . . - . - • Ir , I I .g, - oti° ,.�� Q��° �° (c=n RE=961.60 , - CB -1 1-r� h I I a ,'-� �o I I IE=956.50 1\ RE=961.60 I IE=958.20 I ni I ,�et➢ °l!- ��`------------- 60-60-8o; va oo O0 O0 O0�I a_ _ C O`•�O O 9OX I OaO"O OO"°o .go. A ° oogo;ouo RE=961.90 ° °0°oapa° °uu° 3.o °° °uoaoao°ao°oaoaoa I 960.9 MOW IE=958.70 II IIX \ 6 1 3.0% LINE I I I 6 I1. I \ r MOWI I I I QD Q0I I I I X 961 CY)�IX961.0 - xl 1.� \ LINE N i t �' I rn BUILDING C �� BUILDING D ;; I ;1 I II '+ I 'off' 2.o6'I X 960.6 I I rn I ' 964.5 X I I I II Myo I • / `�° 6, 9 76 SF 6, 9 76 SF I „ ,4 l/I X 9610.1• �^' X 96� 963.9 40' 2.0% � �} CB -17 Ill 198ti II I I I 8 I I 'I l I 98yyo1'1 / � RE=962.50 III n I I I I FFE=963.50 I WO FI_NCE FFE=963.50 IE=959.00 _ I I -- II I I Q I 964.4 1 °j � I CO , F4 + �- �/ 109 II 10' 1 Q 9 .2.. ON - 4- �1� LINE M I • v ca, 109 ,- I X 961.5 / I I \ I I --- ---- --- - bC{•4ti I I I I II 6 --- --- I ' \ r e _ I e ti: J 1:963 --�lf --------- ---- ----� 1 I I ^ I �►? -r---- ------ 963 .-- - I--- ---- ------ , - m r---- ------ I I' w� X96 o I X 95�. 611 \ IX X 963.8 I \ I 9d z.s I l , 9� 23 a rn I I p1 I e� - -------- - --- - - - --- - --- -`- - o� - l CB- X l.' -- 2.71 Ao g62 2.71 ??O °ec►'� X RE- 961.1096 963.8 CB -13 -�k'e` 62.31 2.77 ��,ti 2.71_, i I 0- IE=956.50 - I RE=961.10 -- -- I .4 �. 1 I IE=957.90 I 1 962 o`�-� --- x"61.4 --- '�e -- I I I•. ---,CHAINLINK I I °@ �` ory_-- -- 962.-_9�-�.4 4 e ------ I- -- ,; Id oo ------ FENCE CORNER + �- ------ -- 0 - o r- ----- t� , Io ` g0ti�' - ---- -------, - CB -12 "'� I I1�N�2.5% I 5.1 FT. EAST OF LOT LINE I rl RE=961.10\ \ I 2.5% I' _ I \ I I?59.0 \ \ IE -957.60 � \ I I \ \ \ X /X962.7 9�v,1 e 963.4 I d° • i i �90� --- --------��--, 963 -- -----� ----� ----�- o -i ------------- ---- -- -fin -�, 963 ---- I --- --- _ J it 01, I n I ► r \ a I I `J ^ I 0 I \\ 1 • Ill I 11 I I 1 \ 1110 I II 109 109 X 961 3 { it % I II \\ \\ \X 962.4 CHAINLINK 9 2 Il I' X 961.8 961.2 X ' 1 \ ONELIOT LINE. �o II /\ J �� i 2.0% 1 0 \ 1 \ rnX960.5 °;�I gz BUILDING E BUILDING F o • e I 76 SF I 1 1 X 958.6 69 I X 962.6 1 I /Ill j Q0 6,9 76 SF 1_ NII ° 1 II CB -18 C° Cri RE=962.50 i I I X 60.41 FFE=963.50 • Ill FFE=963.50 IE=959.00 I I QIP I 0 1 ' X 9 .91 00 -3.or � I I I �I''61 I� X 961.5 - I �---5.1-c`on � f': ' ' J i 0 �o u u o-o-o-o-o"o"o"o9090 , f- , 0 0_0_0_0_0_ - , 1 (J l 3.0% v u o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 . 1 1 ���/ --- - - --- - ---- -} - - --- _0 % 1 I 1 X 958.7 960, - . - . - . . - . -�� _I o'' °6� �1� e lCB-4 7 r� oo4,�cQ o,°g� 2.,9 / e'fi' - :i:�\ RE=961.60 1 CB- 15 1010_I la �2.17 • I IE -956a0�. 5 0 RE=961.60 °e = (o . 1 0IE=957.40 }g69CB-14 ' 96.49 X 961.34 RE=961.90 \ 1 ' rn IE= 958.70 --- --------------------z----------- � :932. r----�E-9 ��o-oa-° ° \ u o o -o -o -o o�o �\ �^ ____-_-__-_-_- 4 0� o-o-o`o8o"o"o"o o 0 0 0„0„0.0.01°0_°.� I t5�-- - - - - - o u a o o -o 0 0 00"0 o ;o m°o 0 0 0 0_0.0.0 O ��• Q, I / u v u u-o-o=o- -o"0 0-? 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0.0.0 _ 0 91 2-g� e ? ; , I ,�oaoa�a ,a a„ ° a ° a ° a ° \ I -� i X 959.9 }} 1 .aye s0 I I� oll hX 961.0 1 l 1 X 11 961.3 'Co,\ I 0 I� 1 �� , 1 l yg s � ladti° 1,.a% I' I BUILDING G\ I ' _~ �� 7 � BUILDING H ., , I �pti�i. i 6 976 SF --- - �� 11 6,976 SF x 961 1 co , f I l s !11 l CB -19 � � � I I VIII I X 962. CHAINLINK --� X l962.3 Ill RE=962.50 \ FFE=963.50 I ! 0I1 a FENCE +�- I� 1 ;I I FFE=963.50 IE=959.00 \ I' 1/ X960.7 0.5 FT. WEST OF LOT LINE. 'll 109 Y 109 1 0 I A I 1 I 2.0% e I ;1 I- -9_&3------- ------- �pIN 0 . (n e?3° 1 -------------�----��-- --- -------- - --- ,-- 1$ CB -6 ,O \ I ► Qp \ r J ep, , >< 9901.1 X 960.6 „° oraA \ QP RE=961.40 \ }ooM \ `�� 951.7 � eg / t IE=957.50 �b X 62.4 i `.9 ,5 ?o I I 1962�I - ' NI m ---------------------------- �. I°$ 962.9X 0.61 �° 0.e,7962.6x oy I -Y0.s,% I e----------------==- -- ° -----o----=__=- ___=_------------- r -------------------------- -_ -=- --- 0 RE 961 40 962---------------------------�C��962 ---� CY 960 ��I I IE=956.50 / , 0 1111 LANDSCAPE RE=961.40' , / -960 - - ��2 959 + IE=957.00 959,958 l� �� 958 957 - �\ 40 1 ,--EDGING/MULCH \ I 1 956 957 C =�, N ' 956 / $ �'+ ( - -_ CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER + \- ,��^`1 $ �� 962.2 \ FES -BJ °e ' - � -�__ FES-C� � X ---_g \ ! =' 5.8 FT. EAST OF LOT LINE IE=957.50 I 62 `- `, IE=958.50 $ O 967.2 ,\ FES -D _� ,' 96 -- SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST \\ 9 ill\rn ` IE=957.00 X956 u Uk') a 956 dei �O-X 0- J CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER + �- SIC ` 957 - \, 958 957 3 1\ l 1/4 OF SECTION 14, T. 121, R. 25 0.4 FT. WEST OF LOT CORNER L` `-T 959 958 ` g5c _ I , ' '960 - � N 89°14 00 E N 89°23.06--E -- `a,,� 962 960 -- -�---- n :an.,_--------- ------ 001------------=�n--�--- "-----_---- i ---- 1899.53------ , �, Uif C --- y 962 _ 1--------- - ----- 964.2x - AFS �' �/ JVG.J I o°o° ------------------------ -------------------�_ X -G9- �0 i��- X_ l `;� a�� --X961.3 - �- _ _--- 963.7 0 0 o a,, 63 _ F� y - - - L/L`�- -6� 1 _ / l o ` �3 �2" P - _�� -mow 962- 0 °a°a°o°o�° R�`__------------ --96 c� g6 o o _��__•6 a° - �E _ _ SHED - 2- - - 6 - _ LINEQFC\�� -,C 958.96 - - - - - - _ _ ��� _ X 961.6 - �q�`.�� l --- --�--- g61;'_ _�\-960- X960.2 o, STORM WATER N1CURB 960.5 XI -TEL. '-- LANDSCAPE �h 959�\Xlh INFILTRATION BASIN "\ STOP I RISER EDGING/MULCH �G X LANDSCAPE -= ' NWL = 958.50 CB 1 EDGING /ROCK GOLDEN EAGLE ROAD 2 YR YR = 956.97 589 3 � LEV.=958.16- - _-=SOUTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL _ _ _ _ _ _ - - 8c SHRUBS 100 YR = 959.49 1 � PARK (DOC.# 275353) AS MONUMENTED; ALSO ;g X �� I NORTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF KLEIN FARMS SEE BASIN DETAIL -- 958.7 ON DETAIL SHEET I ESTATES 2ND ADDITION (DOC.# 753470) � --- 1-----� i---- i A r-, n H r� _T_ A I_T_ F__ ahs N I I I A F--'\ Fes► I_T_ I /--"\ N I I I I I 0 30 60 90 r i r GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET SURVEY DATA SURVEY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY: MEYER ROHLIN LAND SERVICES 708 1st AVENUE NE BUFFALO, MN 55313 DATED: APRIL 18, 2017 BENCHMARK: MN/DOT GEODETIC MONUMENT "8605 S" ELEVATION = 966.55 NAVD88 DATUM PROJECT LOCATION PART OF THE SW41 AND NES, SECTION 14 TOWNSHIP 121, RANGE 25, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA. EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 2, BLOCK 3, OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA. GENERAL GRADING NOTES: 1. Specifications applicable for this project: Current standard specifications for Monticello, MN, and the latest Minnesota Department of Transportation Specifications for Highway Construction and all NPDES requirements except where modified by these contract documents. 2. OSHA requirements shall be followed for all work on this project. 3. The Contractor shall notify "Gopher State One Call" 48 hours prior to any excavation (1 -800-252-1166.) 4. The Grading Contractor shall verify all locations and elevations of underground utilities with utility companies prior to any construction, and immediately notify the Engineer of any conflicts. 5. Erosion Control shall be constructed, as applicable, as sequenced below: A. Silt Fence. B. Rock Construction Entrance. C. Demolition D. Common excavation (grading). E. Seed and mulch or sod (See notes on Landscape plan). 6. Final Plat shall govern for easements and lot dimensions. 7. Any erosion control items necessary to protect adjacent properties shall be constructed by the Grading Contractor. 8. Erosion control maintenance shall be performed by the Grading Contractor, and removed as per the Contract Documents or as directed by the Engineer, followed by all necessary restoration of disturbed area. This work shall be incidental to the grading contract. 9. The Grading Contractor shall schedule the soils engineer to facilitate certification of all controlled fills in a timely fashion. Density tests shall meet the following: A. Within the upper 3' of streets, the Grading Contractor shall utilize approved soils that are within 1% of the optimum moisture content as defined by the Standard Proctor Test -ASTM: D-698 with compaction meeting 100% Standard Proctor Density and not exceeding this compaction by more than 1 %. Below the upper 3', compaction shall meet 95% Standard Proctor Density, and be within 3% of the optimum moisture content. Grading tolerances shall be 0.1'. B. Grading tolerances for the remainder of the site shall be 0.25'. 10. All areas of unsuitable soils found in the pad described above that cannot be corrected shall be located in the field by the Grading Contractor. The Grading Contractor shall immediately notify the Engineer of these areas and provide information as to their size and location. 11. The Grading contractor shall provide positive drainage on the site at all times. 12. The Grading Contractor shall keep public streets and travel ways clear of soil and debris. Daily cleaning at the construction entrance shall be performed, especially at the end of each day's work. 13. All silt fence shall be removed at project completion. 14. All proposed elevations are at flow line unless otherwise noted. 15. All erosion control best manage practices shall be per City standards. INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: CO PROJECT LOCATION PLAN C1 SITE PLAN C2 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN C3 SANITARY AND WATER UTILITY PLAN C4 STORM SEWER UTILITY PLAN C5 LANDSCAPE PLAN C6 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C7 EXISTING CONDITIONS AND REMOVALS PLAN C8 DETAILS C9 PHASING PLAN LM ca W � N O (0 z mow, C Q J . soft (U a. p w �•+ z z UCo LU cc z :3 Z -a z_ o Cw .Q Q� IQ CL soft 00C �z ■�1 O Q C Q W 121:� ca UU C� _R"^ v, 00 a lZ 14 N �4 (n cp N C C ~ I p Lo E C44�co� I o p Lo r- -6 W o, c C W 00 Q� 3 CX C ti v1 I c 3 q)42 ° o CO2 V I� �CL tea,°w = g�� o S `�, 1-1 C� c co W q) O 3 a ° °' C t " o a) ° ZZ 11-, Q_ W 101 FILE NO. 00633 Grading and Drainage Plan (n O m O m O W p W ti 0 Q o a W v FILE NO. 00633 Grading and Drainage Plan I MH -1 48" DIA. CONCRETE WITH OUTSIDE DROP NEENAH CASTING R-1642 _- RE=961.50 IE(W)=943.54 (8" IN EX) IE(E)=943.54 (8" OUT EX) IE(S)=949.33 (8" IN) IE(DROP)=944.00 (8") DROP= 7.82 FT 00I s SAN MH h1 RIM ELEV.=961.96 �• INV. ELEV.=943.7 � � �11 -, ___� -, �_, CONNECT TO CITY 10" DIP WATER MAIN 8", GATE VALVE VALVE A DIT RISER DUNDAS ���� ROAD 1 ----�� 10" D.I.P. � o \ \ 15" R.C.P. °o i � � Nk \\ �_ o h END OF 60� �N MH - EXISTING WATER SERVICE p�' CULVERT ; /g RIM ELEV.=960.04 p 960.08 - / �6 959.90 INV. EL V.=942.8 I 61.11 i� 960.66 � 6 GATE VALVE - �( BURIED ,0�°'-960s0��= oo ��959.79 �c ' � 960 � � X 958.6 I r REMOVE EXISTING 6 EXISTING SANITARY - ♦95 -9 7 _ PLUG-- CONNECT WITH -T T -- T SEWER SERVICE - - T_ - - 6^6 / --SBoo- RISER REMOVE EXISTING STREET PAVEMENT AS / , �o o -T -6 T ,� ; _ - - X� 96 0 NECESSARY FOR UTILITY INSTALLATION; SAWCUT - 95°'3 -I 6;?o _ J » - - - - - -� �7 =-962 961 - - - 9s �' _ 8x6 REDUCER AND TO REMAIN WITH _ FOR CLEAN EDGE; REPLACE PAVEMENT TO MATCH-- _ �_ _ _ 8 DIP CL52 PIPE - - - I ____ NO CHANGES "- " > - - EXISTING MATERIALS, - --_=_ "`---'`_ ' _ - - - - �° - X 9 61.5 -� _=_ �m------_-- sX-------.6, 0--- \01.5 61�' SECTION AND ELEVATIONS. g - �o - u --- I - - �\\' 0 ALL WORK TO BE COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE 's, 8" DIP °�, I I WITH CITY STANDARDS. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE A Ipi45' BEND \ '� o� �o �o - - - - - �° I TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN FOR REVIEW AND }I �o CULVERj g62� _ _ _ \- 9 a- '0 n ,. _ ? , APPROVAL BY THE CITY, AND OBTAIN EXCAVATION I '9E%s?A - ?`' �°� EAS 9`°t » DIPr� 8" DIP T`Si do I > Y ti X 963.0 PERMIT FROM CITY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT �;� ;.0_ °'`°� >C 9�.9 45' BEND �� ! X a63. r' 45° BEND} ;%° 1, PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. " \96? 1;�� 7 I 1 1-- I i - - ' " " �T 9 I 0)62.11 X ^' Q A i�9 / �O1;M01�1� _ 631- �o- 20 LF - 6 PVC _ . 1 \ •I20 LF 8" DIP "LI ti PVC _ __-- SCH 40 C� 2.0% N I I � 1 I 11 00 --- -- � � 0 `L ;9- ------ -- SCH 40 ® 2.0% !I - - 45° BEND m . SLOPE OR GREATER Lr- If I ! SLOPE OR GREATER DOMESTIC SANITARY ! I = Q ! DOMESTIC SANITARY 1 l; IE=954.10 IE=954.10 �1 �o I• I 184 LF - 8" I 91>-1.2 h # I I I 6"x6" DIP TEE � \ PVC SDR 26 °tip II - 6"x6" DIP TEE - _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ I X 963.5 9 6 GATE VALVE AND RISER \ \ ®0.40 16� 5° 6 " GATE VALVE AND RISER B �' I L D I N G B 43 LF - 6" DIP CL52 x61.9 1 "� 1 9 1 B J I L D I N C / 43 LF - 6" DIP CL52 � X 9 1,25 I DOMESTIC WATER AND FIRE 6 976 Si DOMESTIC WATER AND FIRE II I I 963.1 x ` o f III 6' 976 �1 SUPPRESSION SUPPLY SUPPRESSION SUPPLY \ \� / X 964.2 • I TOP OF PIPE = 956.00 TOP OF PIPE = 956.00 \ \� FFE =963.E FFE =963. II ° \ w X 9 \I X 614-3 962S0I \ X 961.9 J 962.0 rn \ nLl ° u ° -o- -o-e"o-e"o-�e"ououoo_ 1 9 7 LF - 8 �� °_°_� -9� I \ ' MW' IU°uo°0°0°S°0°0°0°0°�°'•'4 ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° . 6� MH -3 E PVC SDR 26 ° I O A° I Cr- 48" DIA. CONCRETE 1 Ro I I ®0.72! �� I m NEENAH CASTING R-1642 X 1 I X � � i o,`O I 'S 963.7 X % 1 1 / 1 -.-I.-.- 96� - �-'-��'- do g6 96, II' RE=963.05 96� 5 I �9 I 00 �. „ . 62. ti° ��' A6 ° _ MH -2 iF I s I / _. 06� �° -»----»--»--»--»--» -» �- � IE(NE)=952.05 (8 OUT) . \ 48" DIA. CONCRETE / �, \ 1 \ \ NEENAH CASTING R-1642 !'I ° I / g�� g6� I �' \ I \ RE=962.10 o „ „ \ F-- - 1 \ I - -- 96� ° . IE(E)=950.62 (8" IN) � � °' � � � _ ��, � 8x8 IE(S)=950.12 8" IN °' 9 • ,9" 8"x8" ----- -- 258 LF - 8 DIP CL52 ° u_o 0 o DIP TEE _-- '� ° ° e WATER SERVICE INSTALL AT �eoeo oeoeoeoeoe °° ' ( ) X •� 8-8"8"8"8 o�o o°o°o°o�� „o„o�o„o �� i.o�rO I I \ IE(N)=950.07 (8" OUT) I ss �; DIP TEE ° ° ° °- °- MINIMUM 7.5 FT BURY DEPTH ! ! I I � 960.94 I IX 1X9 LINE I I r 6"x6" DIP TEE I MOW I I I I I i II „„ 6»x6 DIP TEE ' 961.7 i/X96 6" GATE VALVE AND RISER \� LINE I I I \\ c,, I II <\� 6 GATE VALVE AND RISER 17 LF - 6" DIP CL52 \ I I I / nezo n „ , o , I I I I I I• I / 17 LF - 6 DIP CL52 B U I c D I N G D DOMESTIC WATER AND FIRE BUILDING C DOMESTIC WATER AND FIRE � X 960.6 1 1 964.5 I I" ��O I I C° 6, °a 76 SF SUPPRESSION SUPPLY 6, . 76 SF SUPPRESSION SUPPLY I I Q„i X 9 X 963.9 X I I 06' +f i TOP OF PIPE = 956.00 11 X 9�0. �I I 6�� I Ijl �5° TOP OF PIPE = 956.00 n I 1 ' i i 96 � / I I a) FFE-963.50 ! '' wo , .� INCE FFE=963.50 964.4 1 °j �j COI SER +\- - » ,l 40 LF - 6" PVC II I °' `' Q I a' I rn I �� g9p2 ON 1 LINE -4c 40 LF 6 PVC SCH 40 ®2.0% ' o V n O' n ' X 9F� .5 / a �.- 15\_1 I SCH 40 ® 2.0% 6 490 LF - 8 DIP I -- - - _ 963 -SLOPE {=-'9 r--=-.---_-_-_-_-_� L SLOPE OR GREATER 9 „ i ! w I I gb CL52 WATER SERVICE I1; II , ,962 _�_.._---=-- DOMESTIC SANITARY - I s��o ti• 1 363 --\ IE 954DOMESTIC0 SANITARY ;i . I9°tio� 96� I X" 61\ \ IX X 963.8 _ I INSTALL WATER ! 96 II 1 8o IE=954.10 - SERVICE AT MINIMUM \ III ?Oo• \o sort 9 !I I !{ I 1 0o I 7.5 FT BURY DEPTH �\\I -, 1, 30 , , 962 - \ ' 0 9 � 1# I I 6� 0 I.. ' = = -? I' o g 62 s 20 X 5 5 # v� 62.3»--» r- -�-»- X _ \ 19 n c z o I ° » » 790 LF 8 DIP CL52 WATER ' _Q6 ti`'°61.4 �6 I II SERVICE INSTALL AT MINIMUM 7.5 s 162 ` ob r ?o;°.. o i CORNER + I� / I FT BURY DEPTH \- 1 I I `r�' I I ` 31 9°� I a, I 5.1 1- I. LAS I UI- LOT LINE 1 » I I� 59.0\ \ \ \ \ .1 o 20 LF - 6 PVC 6 0 \ 963.4X X 962.7 1 I g62�°I I;Oo 20 LF - 6" PVC I I �'' =�60 . SCH 40 ®2.090 HYDRANT I ; --------------------.--SCH 40 ® 2.0% I1 I272 LF - 8" �`I I II / o SLOPE OR GREATER i 1 7 SLOPE OR GREATER �� o HNo. 2 PVC SDR 26 I !! DOMESTIC SANITARY II I I { = 6 GATE VALVE AND RISER �\ I„ I DOMESTIC SANITARY IE=954.10 = ® 0.40q 1 !I I IE=954.10 _ 12 LF 6" DIP CHAINLINK ---�� 9 2• 961.2 X " I; x 961.E � I i II 1 � 6x8 DIP TEE FENCE + \- I II I �/ / - 6"x6" DIP TEE I GROUND ELV.=963.00 ON LOT LINE. 1 �o I' // - 6��x6" DIP TEE \, 6" GATE VALVE AND RISER o \ \\ oX 960.5 6 GATE VALVE AND RISER I I \ \ I • 9y25B J I L D I N G E 43 LF - 6" DIP CL52 BL ILDINC F 43 LF - 6 DIP CL52 DOMESTIC WATER AND FIRE DOMESTIC WATER AND FIRE X 958.6 6,976 SF 6, 9 76 S' SUPPRESSION SUPPLY ° \ I SUPPRESSION SUPPLY TOP OF PIPE = 956.00 �II I `\ 01 / II F TOP OF PIPE = 956.00 FFE - 963.0 Ili 1 11 X 60.4 \ FFE =963...0 " 0 , 0 1 I I1 X 961.5 -� X 9x.9,; I ss '4 61. I I 2•S0A# l u u o o -o -o-080-8 o i i J o X 962.6 [��. 1`; ° u ° ° ° ° ° ° » °°s°o°opo°o°o°o ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ,1 Pe' e"eueeoeoeoeoeoeoeoebeo°-0-0-0�� °_8.8.8.8_° ° 197 LF - 8�. , _,o 8 DIP • _------ PVC SDR 26 \ I x . o �. i 9 �, 45° BEND \ !96� u, 1 X 958.7 MH -4 I I 70 I I @ 0.40% \ i / 48" DIA. CONCRETE �� 6, . , . - - � ob g6� NEENAH CASTING R-1642 -' ?' 1 -' -' - g o° ,� I - y.° / 96�� ' \\ 967. I O 0l o 0 _ o \ RE= 9 61.85 1 90 \ / o°�� \ \ --° _... \ \ 1 i 9 I IE(E)=951.26 (8" IN) -¢ ) .I - ' _ - I �� Qo IE(N)=951.21 (8" OUT) a 960 �6� I g6� I ! _��I MH -5 i I - 961.4 X 961 ! I 9648- DIA. CONCRETE 8"x8" DIP TEE 1�`� \ x I 8 DIP 1 0 NEENAH CASTING R-1642 �o I \ _ 45° BEND o AND 8"x6" DIP �1 I °' _ x 2L:✓ ° ° e'e e e 8 8 8 8uo°0000e�e�e� �- I RE=963.05 .+-°� -- -- --___ u u-o-o-o"o"o"o"o"o"o'o u 8000000000000000"0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 �6�• REDUCER (SOUTH) 1 962 -°V°v°v°v ° ° ° ° ° ° ° e - I e IE(NE)=952.05 (8" OUT) 0 0 0 = I [ X 961.0 ' 68x6" DIP TEE - I 68x6" DIP TEE � 961.3 6 GATE VALVE AND RISER 1 I1 6" GATE VALVE AND RISER 17 LF - 6" DIP CL52 X 96ti1� I I. U 'L D I N G G 17 LF - 6" DIP CL52 BUILDING H DOMESTIC WATER AND FIRE 962.7 B DOMESTIC WATER AND FIRE 6, <<76 SI- SUPPRESSION SUPPLY __ 5. P + \- II g\ II 6,,) 76 SF SUPPRESSION SUPPLY TOP OF PIPE = 956.00 1 , TOP OF PIPE = 956.00 I _i I 133 LF - 6" DIP CL52 WATER �I I \ FFE - 963.50 SERVICE INSTALL WATER SERVICE' _ ;; ! FFE=963.50 \ ;I I; I I I X 960.7 AT MINIMUM 7.5 FT BURY DEPTH 11 I \ II I o I OF LOT LINE. !! 1 �� 10 40 LF - 6 PVC ! I 1 �! 40 LF - 6 PVC "T .; \ 4 SCH 40 @ 2.0% a _ I y SLOPE OR GREATER �� N SCH 40 � 2.0% /�� co 96.2 I l f =_=_=-=_- -= - _. �" SLOPE OR GREATER =,-= .9 - - -- --'DOMESTIC 0 6 SANITARY DIP DOMESTIC SANITARY -o \ \ IE=954.10 I \ E=954. 10 \o \ 6o R 1.1 I 22.5 BENDo \� 6" \ 6ti °� x 960.6 ssl.so , 6ti. 6v }o �o� 951.71 1 62 0C6 t 10 X 962.4 9 .5 = I / g62 `I / 6� , I 6, �-� 6 s o 962.6X\ ' 6 `'0 ��' 6�� e- __________---------- -------------------- - 962.9 o o I ;--- 9 ------------ - _-y---------- �....� so o X--_ __________ -===-o-----------------------------_ ���r���962 L 962 e� ��6 o LANDSCAPE HYDRANT No. 1 e 1 Qhs I 960 959 4 I 'S 6" GATE VALVE AND RISER'/ /� i 960.959 X \�Z•� 958 957-9s \ +960) ; --EDGING/MULCH GROUND ELV.=962.65 958 957O I � ` 956 9S 9EO _ �e�' `� s g6\' ; -- CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER + \- / o , 962.2X\\ - - _ _ X 961.8 \6� 1 5.8 FT. EAST OF LOT LINE 967.2 - ( �, � % °o - X` 96' �\\- -' �- +9'�0 96� 9 ; - SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST \1 _ 956 r X Q A 9 74956 r 957 6/ - 1 121 R 25 n. 0 30 60 90 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET SURVEY DATA SURVEY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY: MEYER ROHLIN LAND SERVICES 708 1st AVENUE NE BUFFALO, MN 55313 DATED: APRIL 18, 2017 BENCHMARK: MN/DOT GEODETIC MONUMENT "8605 S" ELEVATION = 966.55 NAVD88 DATUM PROJECT LOCATION PART OF THE SW4' AND NE'r, SECTION 14 TOWNSHIP 121, RANGE 25, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA. EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 2, BLOCK 3, OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA. GENERAL UTILITY NOTES 1. Specifications applicable for this project: Current standard specifications for the City of Monticello, MN and all Minnesota Department of Health and MPCA requirements except where modified by these contract documents. 2. OSHA requirements shall be followed for all work on this project. 3. The Contractor shall notify "Gopher State One Call" prior to any excavation (651 -454-0002 or 1 -800-252-1166 out state.) 4. The Contractor shall verify all locations and elevations of underground utilities with utility companies prior to any construction (storm sewer, sanitary sewer, water, natural gas, telephone, electric, etc.), and immediately notify the Engineer of any conflicts. 5. The Contractor shall protect all existing utilities and facilities to allow proper functioning during and after construction. Any required supporting structures shall be supplied by the Contractor as work incidental to the contract. 6. The contractor shall immediately notify the Engineer of any conflicts between existing utilities, and the proposed construction. The Engineer will coordinate with the Utility Company in question to determine the need for relocation of the existing utility. 7. Existing conditions such as sand in manholes or valve boxes shall be identified by the Contractor and these shall be reported to the Engineer prior to excavation by the Contractor. Once construction has begun, all damage to underground utilities will be assumed to have been caused by the Contractor, any repairs necessary shall be performed by the Contractor at the Contractor's expense. 8. Final Plat shall govern for easements. 9. The Contractor shall coordinate with the local jurisdiction to obtain permits and meter for water source. All associated costs shall be incidental to the Contract, including disposal of test water into City's sanitary sewer system. The Contractor shall not operate gate valves or hydrants on the City's water supply system. 10. The Contractor shall notify the City Engineer and the Project Engineer 48 hours prior to starting work or as required by the local jurisdiction or be subject to being shut down. 11. The Contractor shall keep access roads clear of soil or other debris, and perform daily street cleaning as required by the NPDES permit. Positive drainage, controlled with erosion control and erosion prevention measures as required by the NPDES permit shall be performed. Inlet protection shall be installed within 48 hours after inlet construction. Unless specified on the plans or as a bid item on the Bid Form, any temporary culverts, ditches, filter fabric, etc. necessary to accomplish this shall be performed as incidental to the Contract. 12. The Contractor shall preserve and protect the markers and monuments set for the subdivision of the land. 13. The Contractor shall schedule the soils engineer to facilitate certification of all controlled fills in a timely fashion. Density tests shall meet the following: A. Density tests shall be taken on all trenches at locations as determined by the Engineer or his representative. B. Within the upper 3 of streets private drives and parking lots Contractor shall utilize approved soils that are within 1% PP � P P 9 PP optimum moisture content as defined by the Standard Proctor Test -ASTM: D-698 with 100% Standard Proctor Density and not exceeding compaction by more than 1%. Below the upper 3', compaction shall meet 95%. Grading tolerances shall be 0.1'. 14. The Owner shall pay for all testing of soils compaction. Any areas which fail to meet the above standards shall be corrected and re -tested by the Owner's testing agent at the Contractor's expense. 15. All water main shall be installed with a minimum of 7.5 feet of cover. 16. Contractor shall provide temporary traffic control in compliance with MN/DOT "Temporary Traffic Control Zone Layouts Field Manual" most recent version for construction adjacent to travel ways. 17. Contractor shall be responsible for verification of the depth of existing stubs listed on this plan prior to the ordering of any fittings, structures, castings, etc. Engineer, Owner or City shall not be responsible for any discrepancies found as depths are estimated. 18. The contractor shall coordinate schedule with adjacent property owners to minimize disturbance for water shut down and temporary closure of access if necessary. 19. The contractor shall be responsible for coordinating with utility companies for power pole and/or line relocation required. 20. The contractor shall provide all necessary traffic control. 21. The contractor shall be responsible for all grading and restoration required to restore surfaces to like kind existing condition. 22. Existing curb and pavement damaged or impacted on adjacent property shall be restored with in-kind materials and section. All match lines are to be saw cut. 23. The contractor shall obtain a Utility Excavation Permit from the City Public Works Department prior to commencement of utility connections. 24. City will not be responsible for costs incurred that are associated with variations in the utility as -built elevations. These elevations are to be field verified prior to construction. 25. City will maintain sanitary sewer mainline and watermain system within the site. Property owners will be responsible for maintenance of storm sewer system. 26. Installation of fire suppression systems in buildings to only be installed when deemed necessary by building department based on building use and/or occupier activity. CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER + \- F�� - - - 957 I� _ - - `- �. 958 So I 1/4 OF SECTION 14, T. , I I 958 _ 959 - I , „ 0.4 FT. WEST OF LOT CORNER --�. l O FT T'�. 959 _ - .960 �n 1 N 89°14 00 E O \ 960 ^ - X �dJ.4 N 89°1400 E _ ----- �o�-----r-�---- col ----- -- ��--- --- ----- ------ --------------------------- - - 962 ----- L y 9.6 ! N � 9 i 4 i� ii E ------ y 9 62 = No - j ----- _ ---- ------3123.56----- 964.2"\ - -- 963 \ ' 1[ *00_� _801 o "" _ ----------------------- -------------------- � x �-�� _��_/ �_ -� X- //, `� 961.3 ------963.7 �oY o�o a 96- 0- - - - - - - a MOW_, o °°�o� `��_-��R�`y - --- _ _ - - 7 _g61-�� SHED \962--��� _�`�66 INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: - - LINE- �,%'��_ 960= \�`�-TC 958.96-- __-______ ��_1 X961.6g61 \- X960.2 0�0��T \\\959 OhCv --TEL. STOP 960.5X I; T LANDSCAPE CO PROJECT LOCATION PLAN X ;' _X 1 \\ I RISER EDGING/MULCH C2 GITE PLAN LANDRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN EDGINGSROCK GOLDEN EAGLE ROAD Chi '-,�\B �- - _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ � LEV.-9.16- _ _--SOUTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL & SHRUBS PARK (DOC.# 275353) AS MONUMENTED; ALSO C3 SANITARY AND WATER UTILITY PLAN SAN MH X I NORTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF KLEIN FARMS I I I C4 STORM SEWER UTILITY PLAN ELEV.=958.59--, 958.7 I ESTATES 2ND ADDITION (DOC.# 753470) 1 I 1 C5 LANDSCAPE PLAN I -----I----------I------� \ I I I I I C6 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C7 EXISTING CONDITIONS AND REMOVALS PLAN Ga I I I I I I I C8 DETAILS F__n F-) I\ ,h �` Fr_ (` _T_A I�� C--�h� n I I� A n F`i I S I /� N I I I I I C 9 PHASING PLAN w ct kr) W � kr) O M ct N On ct Ct W O ct N z CIL 0 LO 0 L w� 4-1 � 1- z �z C j O li:� O C) -Q) Iz U CL 00 -� - O III Q) W Q �nn frr-cn vl u J a o 00 2 0 Q3 q) co N `oma'` o V L O Z W I OLO �-6 eDca00 4 Z3 0 o� o �CL (51 t v L �n5 O S � V , \. •c C m Q Q) a o -b -°c " o a3 ° � 3 w -'moi.., O Z 8 FILE NO. 00633 Sanitary and Water Utility Plan 0 0 ti 0 m Q o W a W v v FILE NO. 00633 Sanitary and Water Utility Plan I I I GFES-G; 15" RCP FES -F; 18" RCP INV=958.50 INV=958.50 WITH 2.9 CY CL3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ,� - RIP -RAP WITH FABRIC- - - - - 40 LF 18 RCP CL3 » Ib ROAD PIPE ® 1.259; l 40 LF 15 RCP CL3 DUNDAS )(�' LENGTH INCLUDES FES l PIPE ® 0.50%; _ _ _ _ }<�' FES -E• 18" RCP LENGTH INCLUDES FES - „ I I I INV=958.00 � ,` I \I ,\ 10 O.I.P. I I I I I I I I i 1 FES -H; 15" RCP WITH 3.6 CY CL3 RIP -RAP WITH FABRIC INV= 958.70 � - � 15 R. C. P L _ � s � s � � - MH cl�SAN MH - 6\'�/ o _ 'c� `9so o`ti``� I g60 IM ELEV.=96 FES -A l _ h1 I I �g �6, �� 0.O�o i �� 959.9 INV. EL V 42 21" RCP RIM ELEV.-961.96 �� , - 9 961.11 960.66 -( - - > 6°' - 960 0 ; °0 959. / INV. ELEV.=943.7 , °� ,� _ _ - �< - - - - -�` 9600 ,�- - _ INV=958.00 ,( oro - - I RFd , _ _ - _ 9s8 4. 9- -I� - WITH 4.6 CY CL3 ___-96 - * /� 900 960 - » / °,so »-r- »-cw,�-1 _ X 958.6 , � - 144 LF 12 DUAL -WALL ----� _ -t - - -9 +� - RIP -RAP WITH FABRIC �. 9 959.7. _ 959.2X T _ �� x 9._5q .3 X60- s, sg800 RISER- - - HDPE PIPE @ 0.21 % _ 960.6 Xj,�o� °-Tod T T T - 960 - T T -'_ �' ��-T--960 _�6' - �a 16^�-o ----- ---- - ---- J.' 1, '961 '% 18 L 21" RCP L3 962 _ - 'w- �-�.----=-- -------------- -'9s »- » ° _ PIPE F ® 0.00q; C --� 96------- _----y `9 62 _ _ - 962.1 g- o - u--- ��T - - - -- LENGTH INCLUDES FES --- 001.5 pl 6'30 �ry' .5 �, I / / - ii JJ # 144 LF 12» CB DUAL -WALL � -8 -9 - - _ � �o � CB 1 / I /LLTO » 96 �bti; i11� » }I 9 HDPE PIPE ®0.21 % _ tia 48 DIA CONCRETE ? 60 DIA CONCRETE I`I = �� NEENAH CASTING R-3067 �, �ti° > NEENAH CASTING R-3067 CB -9 I X RE=961.106 I o RE -961.20 962.SX Q ;' �' -962 2'x3' PRECAST CONCRETE - - -�6�_ IE(S)=958.00 (12" IN) 9s i� I 0'62 ` X IE(S)=956.50 (36" IN) 9 / NEENAH CASTING R-3067 I �6ti� ____ _ �o �� �c w ,3 - - - - IE(W)=957.70 (12" IN) ?� m IE(W)=957.40 (12" IN) �o' RE=961.20 � l IE(E)=958.00 (12" OUT) IE(E)=957.70 (12" OUT) „ rr IE(NE)=958.00 (21 " OUT) Cn IE(SUMP)=953.00 (3' DEPTH) 109 III 109 _I II L. 911 ).286 LF 12" DUAL ALL J# CB -16 _ - - - �6�oI ►`'�-� II h L,J 1i oiI ° HDPE PIPE @ 1.v1 "6-% - 27" DIA CONCRETE �o1I21y � 1�8 LF 36 PERFORATEDNEENAH CASTING R-4342 X61 Cp \\ 2. I BUILDING A 62 ' RE=962.50 I I I II X611.9 DUAL0 WALL HDPE PIPE X 6,976 SF ��9 IE(E)=959.00 (12" OUT) I FIILTRATIONITROCK 963.1 0 I \ TRENCH; SEE DETAIL FFE=963.50 1 THIS SHEET FFE=963.50 \� ' • " / \ -\ X 96 6, I �x - � X 61 \ X 961.9 3 9 \ I \ I I s2so'i, o" \ 962.0 0 \ \ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0"'0' o o I oro , N I •J M�, v u O-O-O-O`O'Q O O•'O'"O O^O„O_O„O„O„O_O_�_O [^ n _ '/' � \ .606 08 2- 0"0"0'"0""o"o„o„o0 --LIE9s� 1 I I I I Ao ct I \\ I 963.7 X _/' I Ao / - - 96 - - t - 144 LF 12" DUAL -WALL 9 5 I m 1 I X 96 .5 ` I .�•-•-• •-•-•��•-•-I' oo HDPE PIPE @ 0.21% 0 6 96, 1 X\96118 963.7 • 962, �S / nj`.l° I oiro 96^New 40 >0 I \ \ n _-------------' -' 6 ------------- _ \ \ I I i 110 � / g�� - 96�, � I � � � � � N I 1 I \ 964.3 I 1 1 o CB -2 �P I 110) �� CB -10 �° I I 60" DIA CONCRETE CB_ 11, >1 g ' 96�ko X 9161.5'-I" " " 0 o_° 27" DIA CONCRETE is ° o =\,` ��,o I /� _ NEENAH CASTING R-3067 °^ g� NEENAH CASTING R-2573 o° RE=961.60 2x3 PRECAST CONCRETE I 96 I RE=961.90 I I 96iIES =956.50 36" IN NEENAH CASTING R-3067 1 2so;.'- \ ^ I _ O ( ) l l 1 I IE(E)=958.70 (12 OUT) IE(W)=958.40 (12" IN) RE=961.60 IE(N)=956.50 (36 OUT) IE(E)=958.20 (12" OUT) l 1 _I I _ X 961.7 /X961.0 X'11 \ MI / c� ° r/ - •-1 I N LIQ IE(SUMP)=953.00 (3' DEPTH) -nl^o n ry`' nl III nlnl� n d ; \' { rn I\ I I 1 I BUILDING C , 9 CB -17 11 'AI --96i /II X 960.6 I I 964.5 I I o I I CD 27" DIA CONCRETE I I �o I X 960. J �^' X 96,X 963.9 X I I 1 j„ 6, 9 76 SF >� , „ 162. ;� / �8 NEENAH CASTING R-4342 I III 9 I I I I I j rn{ i-1 I g62y l/ 74 LF 12" DUAL-WALLfI RE=962.50 I III I I n I I I WOE F -NCE IF FE HDPE PIPE ® 1.89.% IE(E)=959.00 (12 OUT) I III �� I w \ 136 LF 36 PERFORATED 964.4 � � CO yEF' + �- / 109 III � I � � jj 109 II - I Q I DUAL -WALL HDPE PIPE ~glj2._�ON-I:,O7 LINE u cF1 a o ®0.00% WITHIN _ I \ d' 4 ��-�-- 06 I I I w I INFILTRATION ROCK 136 LF 12" DUAL-WALL�_I �� 1 -�=F �F:963 --- - 6666 6666- 6666 ----�6 1f o 1 I 963.-- - _ 6666 --- 6666 96r----'---- 6666- - - ;;o�� 96 o I X'TRENCH; SEE DETAIL HDPE PIPE 00.22% III I I,\9s28� 6666-f =--- 6666 '- I \\ 23 I I 9 I _ THIS SHEET I \ 962 " 0 f I I I 00.1 O'' 144 LF 12" DUAL -WALL I II \ I +19 a6�h°6� 621 - = HDPE PIPE ®0.21% °ti�' =9�� CO I I I I } g - Ce �o ��o \ �0 9s,�o � " X � .511 I g6�j 6 I --'--'--'6666-'--'--'-' 6666 6 6 9T � X959. X 963.8 /illa I ____-_ _ %._._._._._._._._.-'-.-'--.-'-.-'- .-.-.---._.+-.._._._._. .666'6 ---- » » »- _...� ....... IQ, .. i 962 -- 6ti�j61.4 I s� 96titi° I �, CB�� 3 j CB -13 j�+I 1 I2 - - �6�6666- oo�- ` I r -- -- 962 .-_ 1 :r�,7, t I I I ?moo;'- °o I o 6 60 DIA CONCRETE + - " I'°�'-6� CB -12 I ti I I NEENAH CASTING R-3067 48 DIA CONCRETE I I 9 I 96 '` RE=961.10 NEENAH CASTING R-3067 11 I I \ 48" DIA CONCRETE j �; 5 „ _ \ �� RE=961.101 oo,' �,1� \ NEENAH CASTING R-2573 6? I II I� IE(S)=956.50 (36 IN) o I 8 T >( 962.7 I 6z \ (6u ---------- ---- _o IE(N)=957.90 (12" IN) �I 9 II o� ` ------- -•----4- 9- ---- � I IE(W)=957.30 (12 IN) / ,o------------------------- ------ - - 963 66 -- -_ RE=961.10 -II 01 1 IES =957.90 12" OUT I I II ( h T I I IE(N)=957.60 (12" IN) II �' I o IE(N)=956.50 (36" OUT) () ( ) / l Ijj i a IE(S)=957.60 (12" IN) II I I' IE(SUMP)=953.00 (3' DEPTH) I °' II I 109 IE(W)=957.60 (12" OUT) a61 3 II 01.: > I I \ III I X961.8 , / ll I 1 o CHAINLINK ---�^ 9'2 FENCE + 74 LF 12" DUAL -WALL( \ \ ON LOT LINE. I ° III / HDPE PIPE @ 1.89% �° , , , ; , , / , I! \ \ oX 960.5 6ti. 111 i � w r. , o BUILDING E CB -18 I - 96ry 1 \\ 136 LF 15" DUAL -WALL �� I 962 /IIINt 6, 9 76 SF ` 27" DIA CONCRETE C° I I X 958.6 \ I / NEENAH CASTING R-4342 I 1 1 HDPE PIPE ®0.22% 1 I �// If RE=962.50 „ / 1 I FFE=963.50 IE(E)=959.00 (12" OUT) 0 136 LF 36 PERFORATED 1 ,� DUAL -WALL HDPE PIPE - ; I s II X61.1 X 961.5 - X 9 �J.9 I � -, --5.'@ 0.00% WITHIN 62.50 I " ° ° ° ° ° ° , % ) 0 INFILTRATION ROCK X 962.6 (7 , rl 11 u u °- 0606o-o"o"'0"''0"0"0„0°0°0 00�000000o�o�or",o,",o"o°o°�S°o°ol°o°o°o°o°o�o°^°^°^°moo?O?O_°_°_°-p I _ I\ " u u o 0 0 0 0 0 0' oj�o"o O O 040 0 0 0 0 0 0 °° TRENCH; SEE DETAIL °°°°°°°°°°° X u ��.8 i' \/ -9 7- l THIS SHEET \ .° / \ -144 LF 12" DUAL WALL - \ �6� 6�� ✓✓✓ l I IIX 958.7 l _ , `- . - HDPE PIPE ®0.76% I ^) 96,E I I� �i 7.90 � �6�' -'- -'- ------------------------ _ _._._............._ .. � 1 x _ _�_ I _ • a te« - - ........d � • I 6'� i i C9 II 96''0 C?I6� CB -14 -� III CB -15 \ ` 27" DIA CONCRETE 961.3 961 CB -4 " 11 �� \ NEENAH CASTING R-2573 96�' 60" DIA CONCRETE 48 DIA CONCRETE . I \I - 660 I \ NEENAH CASTING R-3067 °o' r ---X-962 RE=961.90 °"°uo°o °"°u°°°° NEENAH CASTING R-3067 f . 92. +_9 _ _ °_°_ °- °- ° ° ° ° ,00 6ti I I 0000000 0 0^O O� o .80.0.0-0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 _ RE=961.60 RE=961.60 1 1 9626 , IE(W)=958.70 (12 OUT) IE(S)=956.50 (36" IN) IE(N)=957.60 (12 IN) , II 961. IE(E)=957.60 (12" IN) \ I I IE(N)=956.50 (36 OUT) IX 961.3 IE(S)=957.40 (15" OUT) II ' I I \ I : 1 (.0 o oil X ,96ti�� 1 ISI. l BUILDING G ' 9CB-19 �- i I 962.7 1i o B 1 I° o 1j 6tih , 6,976 SF 1 27" DIA CONCRETE X 96�- II{ 962.3 NEENAH CASTING R-4342 CHAINLINK RE=962.50 151 LF 18" DUAL- WALL"1 -11 I FFE=963.50 \\ IE(E)=959.00 (12" OUT) Il I I / " I: � 151 LF 36 PERFORATED II HDPE PIPE ®0.26% ll I 86 LF 12" DUAL -WALL \ 109 f � DUAL -WALL HDPE PIPE OF LOT LINE. 1 I IHDPE PIPE @ 1.16% �T t I\ II ll C� 0.00% WITHIN N _ -�_--- --g63_---_-=_=,�L - --__---- =T-- �� 1 ' INFILTRATION ROCK 'TRENCH; SEE DETAIL I I �s- J-- X - --- _-- �96 �, THIS SHEET co 962.30 1 - ---- ry�o T \ T I 121 Ir jl lllOO \ 1 i \ �%;' I g6�'g0ii 6X9, -1 CB -6 � . X 960.6 961.80 , ti 6ti' » es' / CB -7 _ %��� }9� o II 48 DIA CONCRETE �� ;; I s �o NEENAH CASTING R-3067 06' ' 9 48 DIA CONCRETE � .5 ', •�o X 962.4 � f �'� „ CB -5 RE -961.40 ss' NEENAH CASTING R-3067 o� ' ( . ---96 : „ 60 DIA CONCRETE RE=961.40 \ o�. 1-----------sem-------------------6666-- ° IE(N)=958.00 (12 IN) � ________so ;NEENAH CASTING R-3067 IE(N)=957.00 (15" IN) ' 06 o��� -----____- IE(S)=957.50 (12 OUT) --6666-- - __ __ _ _ o ---------------6666-- - -- RE=961.40 IE(S)=957.00 (15" OUT) �� - M`962 -------------- 6666-- 6666-- . IE(SUMP)=954.50 (3' DEPTH) ! I s IE(S)=958.50 (18" IN) IE(SUMP)=954.00 (3' DEPTH) "�)� �/ s =� 9Fn QF�`F / 1 959, 958 IE(N)=956.50 (36" OUT) 15 LF 12" RCP CL3 \ 95 7 - s�so \ ��= IE(SUMP)=953.00 (3' DEPTH) @ 0.0% f J; I b� - / ,-- CHAINLINK /-LNCE CORNER + - 9s, LENGTH INCLUDES FES �� ; so ,/ 962 12 LF 18 RCP CL3 ; 961 8 +9g 16 LF 15 RCP CL3 X oo FES -C I 1 i @ 0.09 0,)\ j'so,''' 5.8 FT. EAST OF LOT LINE ® 0.0% FES -D , i" 12" RCP _ j ,I LENGTH INCLUDES FES I FES- LENGTH INCLUDES FES .-SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST 15" RCP _ 956 INV=957.50 �, V 56 r 957 / 18" RCP 114 OF SECTION 14 T. 121 R. 25 CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER - WITH 2.1 CY CL3 '� 958 ' INV=957.00T,�-; -�` 958 _ .959 INV=958.50 „ 0.4 FT. WEST OF LOT CC WITH 2.9 CY CL3, T �., 959 RIP -RAP WITH FABRIC.. '960 a�WITH 3.6 CY CL3 N 89°14 00 E N 89°14'00" E RIP -RAP WITH FABRIC'' 960 - x yn�.� 2 01 -X _ 601 -'----r--------6666 _--- .' _ _'6666-----.96 �_- -- RIP -RAP WITH FABRIC --- 1899.53---- -----3123.56----- 964.2 �><, -962 6666 y� I Ivy �uLi' t ---_L ( _._ -- - i - - - --- \_ 963 ^ - L, zS I r y O �( ��, u7 _�c� I �10,0:, o -=�� --6666----------� X'� �•��=---� - __-X/961.36666-- 963.ooo 0a6�_ �� _- - - - - - -- \ - l °o / S� MOW-, o o �°aQ-� \ER�-- - _ - - - _ _g61-�� SHED \962- '�-� o ,�- �� --.66 ---_LINE -960 Q�\\�� �C 958.96 - --- ���__- X961.6 g61 t� - v �\� CURB X i r, - - 960 x 960.2 Goho' X \\959 �`�� STOP 960.5 1 --TEL. LANDSCAPE _X X ; RISER EDGING/MULCH �Ib LANDSCAPE - GOLDEN EAGLE 1� OAD h�1 ��CB FL ',, �h EDGING ROCK C �LEV.=958 16 _ --_SOUTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL - - - / PARK (DOC.# 275353) AS MONUMENTED; ALSO 8c SHRUBS SAN MH X 1 I NORTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF KLEIN FARMS ELEV.=958.59 -- . 958.7 I ESTATES 2ND ADDITION (DOC.# 753470) -- F ------I------1 \ I I/ JI F__ I n I I F__ A F-) A Fr_ (- _T_ A I_T_ F__ r- �h� �G N I n i A n h► I S I N I I I INFILTRATION ZONE 1 MNDOT SELECT GRANULAR MATERIAL (NATIVE MATERIAL IF DEEMED 1.5' ABOVE PIPE ACCEPTABLE BY ENGINEER) 12" ABOVE PIPE t 1 INFILTRATION ZONE " TO 2" WASHED AND CRUSHED STONE MATERIAL 24" TO SIDES AND 12" BELOW PIPE 36" PERFORATED HDPE PIPE 1.0' BELOW PIPE r PROJECT LOCATION PART OF THE SW4 AND NE4, SECTION 14 TOWNSHIP 121, RANGE 25, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA. EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 2, BLOCK 3, OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA. 0 30 60 90 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET SURVEY DATA SURVEY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY: MEYER ROHLIN LAND SERVICES 708 1st AVENUE NE BUFFALO, MN 55313 DATED: APRIL 18, 2017 BENCHMARK: MN/DOT GEODETIC MONUMENT "8605 S" ELEVATION = 966.55 NAVD88 DATUM GENERAL UTILITY NOTES 1. Specifications applicable for this project: Current standard specifications for the City of Monticello, MN and all Minnesota Department of Health and MPCA requirements except where modified by these contract documents. 2. OSHA requirements shall be followed for all work on this project. 3. The Contractor shall notify "Gopher State One Call" prior to any excavation (651 -454-0002 or 1 -800-252-1166 out state.) 4. The Contractor shall verify all locations and elevations of underground utilities with utility companies prior to any construction storm sewer, sanitary sewer, water, natural as telephone, electric etc. and immediate) notify the Engineer of an conflicts. ( Y 9 P )� Y Y 9 Y 5. The Contractor shall protect all existing utilities and facilities to allow proper functioning during and after construction. Any required supporting structures shall be supplied by the Contractor as work incidental to the contract. 6. The contractor shall immediately notify the Engineer of any conflicts between existing utilities, and the proposed construction. The Engineer will coordinate with the Utility Company in question to determine the need for relocation of the existing utility. 7. Existing conditions such as sand in manholes or valve boxes shall be identified by the Contractor and these shall be reported to the Engineer prior to excavation by the Contractor. Once construction has begun, all damage to underground utilities will be assumed to have been caused by the Contractor, any repairs necessary shall be performed by the Contractor at the Contractor's expense. 8. Final Plat shall govern for easements. 9. The Contractor shall coordinate with the local jurisdiction to obtain permits and meter for water source. All associated costs shall be incidental to the Contract, including disposal of test water into City's sanitary sewer system. The Contractor shall not operate gate valves or hydrants on the City's water supply system. 10. The Contractor shall notify the City Engineer and the Project Engineer 48 hours prior to starting work or as required by the local jurisdiction or be subject to being shut down. 11. The Contractor shall keep access roads clear of soil or other debris, and perform daily street cleaning as required by the NPDES permit. Positive drainage, controlled with erosion control and erosion prevention measures as required by the NPDES permit shall be performed. Inlet protection shall be installed within 48 hours after inlet construction. Unless specified on the plans or as a bid item on the Bid Form, any temporary culverts, ditches, filter fabric, etc. necessary to accomplish this shall be performed as incidental to the Contract. 12. The Contractor shall preserve and protect the markers and monuments set for the subdivision of the land. 13. The Contractor shall schedule the soils engineer to facilitate certification of all controlled fills in a timely fashion. Density tests shall meet the following: A. Density tests shall be taken on all trenches at locations as determined by the Engineer or his representative. B. Within the upper 3' of streets, private drives and parking lots, Contractor shall utilize approved soils that are within 1% optimum moisture content as defined by the Standard Proctor Test -ASTM: D-698 with 100% Standard Proctor Density and not exceeding compaction by more than 1%. Below the upper 3', compaction shall meet 95%. Grading tolerances shall be 0.1'. 14. The Owner shall pay for all testing of soils compaction. Any areas which fail to meet the above standards shall be corrected and re -tested by the Owner's testing agent at the Contractor's expense. 15. All water main shall be installed with a minimum of 7.5 feet of cover. 16. Contractor shall provide temporary traffic control in compliance with MN DOT "TemporaryTraffic Control Zone Layouts Field Manual" most recent version for construction adjacent to travel ways. 17. Contractor shall be responsible for verification of the depth of existing stubs listed on this plan prior to the ordering of any fittings, structures, castings, etc. Engineer, Owner or City shall not be responsible for any discrepancies found as depths are estimated. 18. The contractor shall coordinate schedule with adjacent property owners to minimize disturbance for water shut down and temporary closure of access if necessary. 19. The contractor shall be responsible for coordinating with utility companies for power pole and/or line relocation required. 20. The contractor shall provide all necessary traffic control. 21. The contractor shall be responsible for all grading and restoration required to restore surfaces to like kind existing condition. 22. Existing curb and pavement damaged or impacted on adjacent property shall be restored with in-kind materials and section. All match lines are to be saw cut. 23. The contractor shall obtain a Utility Excavation Permit from the City Public Works Department prior to commencement of utility connections. CASTING I CASTING I INFILTRATION ZONE I INFILTRATION ZONE MNUVI DtLLUI GRANULAR MATERIAL MNUVI stLLUI GRANULAR MATERIAL 1.5' ABOVE PIPE (NATIVE MATERIAL IF DEEMED 1.5' ABOVE PIPE (NATIVE MATERIAL IF DEEMED ACCEPTABLE BY ENGINEER) ACCEPTABLE BY ENGINEER) t 1 12" ABOVE PIPE I 1 21" RCP 12" ABOVE PIPE A OUTLET PIPE 36" PERFORATED INFILTRATION ZONE 36" PERFORATED INFILTRATION ZONE HDPE PIPE" 958.00 HDPE PIPE J" TO 2" WASHED AND J" TO 2" WASHED AND CRUSHED STONE MATERIAL CRUSHED STONE MATERIAL 24" TO SIDES AND 24" TO SIDES AND 12" BELOW PIPE 12" BELOW PIPE Ii956.50 956.50, 956.50., I T_- I 1.0' BELOW PIPE r 1.0' BELOW PIPE r 36" SUMP 36" SUMP 953.5011r s ALL SUMP STRUCTURES TO HAVE 2 - 3" WEEP HOLES IN BASE SLAB STRUCTURE AND INFILTRATION ZONE SECTION VIEW TYPICAL SLOPE TRENCH SIDES PER 111 -OSHA REQUIREMENTS - - Illi 12" MINIMUM / SELECT GRANULAR / SELECT 111111 -- MNDOT ABOVESPEC PPE92B FILL 111111// _ INITIAL ENCASE STONE - 24" 24" BACKFILL MATERIAL IN j D Illll HAUNCHING GEOTEXTILE FABRIC MNDOT SPEC 3733 - 12" TYPE 1 111111 ll 11111 BEDDING 11111E IIIII®11111411116IIIII®11111= 1. BEDDING SHALL BE a' TO 2' WASHED AND CRUSHED STONE MATERIAL 2. FILL PLACEMENT SHALL BE PLACED IN 8" MAX. LOOSE LIFTS AND COMPACTED TO 95% STANDARD PROCTOR. 3. GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TO BE PLACE ON TOP AND SIDES OF TRENCH ONLY. NO FABRIC ON BOTTOM. INFILTRATION ROCK TRENCH DETAIL (INSTALL ON SELECT PIPES AS NOTED ON PLAN) 953.501( r s ALL SUMP STRUCTURES TO HAVE 2 - 3" WEEP HOLES IN BASE SLAB STRUCTURE AND INFILTRATION ZONE SECTION VIEW CB -1 INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: CO PROJECT LOCATION PLAN C1 SITE PLAN C2 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN C3 SANITARY AND WATER UTILITY PLAN C4 STORM SEWER UTILITY PLAN C5 LANDSCAPE PLAN C6 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C7 EXISTING CONDITIONS AND REMOVALS PLAN C8 DETAILS C9 PHASING PLAN 0�4 �m LM CU W O an -an CC CIO CL ■ _ L ca W Z W � O a. "o o aqi 00 N0) N (/� co N C C I p Lo E I o V L O Z W I OLO O�-6 co ca ��- 'n0 coir U c o� c .� 00 O 42 J1 V 41Z 0 q,` U O O D Q a: y O N O 3 C 11-,O Q_ 2 0 N '113C z V (ag O � W� a: 0 oo 0 Q � c v v z_cr O � W V LJ Cn o mum c ::):�i r CL0:� O "o o aqi 00 N0) N (/� co N C C I p Lo E I o V L O Z W I OLO O�-6 co ca ��- 'n0 coir U c o� c .� 00 O 42 J1 V 41Z 0 q,` U O O D Q a: y O N O 3 C 11-,O Q_ 2 0 FILE NO. 00633 Storm Sewer Utility Plan V U) 0 0 oo 0 Q o � a v v FILE NO. 00633 Storm Sewer Utility Plan 0 00 I I I I K I K I I I I K I I I I DUNDAS ROAD i - 10" D.I.P. 1 I I I �h�• I I I I I I I I T � �� 15" R.C.P. 00 �N MH s SAN MH�- ''ABM o I L96, �� I /96� RIM ELEV.=960.04 1 I �g `�� 960.0° 6 I RIM ELEV.=961.96 ��• I 6 - - - - - �6, _ - 959.90 INV. ELF�V =942.8 h 961.11 6 96 66 - -)� 960 ).� �, a,6°�= 960 so) (� - °o ' 959.79 INV. ELEV.=943.7 °� - x _ _ ,' ��' ---_961''--- s*� 960 e!-__ -� �' 9�9»-�-� _ X958.6 T �T --T - T- p\ 60 - ��,` -T-I--Se.00 RISER - --, 962 - ----- - - 962_ y ''- --- !w�_�=----�--�= - _-?{--- �° '- X 961.5 962.1.= - - -----------=-- -� ` - --- _ _ .6- - - - �o - - - - \y°01.5 6`'�' 0 Iv •x`30��ti R I \ p 9 o I 6 9629 S �A I . - XII I 963.0;�X 363. t- O V^ 962.8x 96 62.K_SIN?I �^ X 9E2.9 O 6 m ------�- Li -% ---- 9 63 Y- 0 1 n ----- - -- 963 I S.I ONE 109 C7 109 C7 0 � - ' • f- f' � MULCH .6 ° I I , y -jibv' I POLY -------- 0 k; 9g2`5; \ ° I '- EDGING X 962.2 1 \ X 963.5 o - °--- II \ L`' M' 9625°;; BUILDING A 62� a6v� BUILDING B o I 11 x61.9 I \ `X. 913;2.15 I - K F G 6,976 SF �'g 6,976 SF 0 I I I\ I\ 963.1 X\ o I I II 3 2 i' o. l I \ / X 964.2 \ I' FFE=963.50 \ \ DS- FFE=963.50 ° w o 'll h I \ � x9 6, I . I 116�' I I 6 I \ 9s2s01 v 962.0 i ' ;, ! r' U U u o 0 -0 -o -o -O o od o•,o"ou ooa0000000000'0000' o 0 0 1T 1 ., u u 0-0-0-0 `'/"o'o"o"'0 0 0 0 0„°„0-0_0_�.� ° 7' L N I M�T ° a O ass° o O' O�O���O�o�o�o�o♦?0�0�090�0�� ° ° al°o ° , a -9 I \' �- O O O O y 0 0 0 0 0 0 o n • 6L� I o 'Q61 0LI E I / :1 • z0 I • X o) qPO^� I 1 m 963.7X96 .5X I 1 / I 96%. -�-� I 96 .7 _ _.-.-.- - ° 96� X1961j8X963 K ' s-� �•• •-. . o r Iry ; I 96''0 964.3kr) tP I I N 9 I _g IN I I I I I I rn X 9f~' I •� • J u--U-O-OX-O9"O8i- . -0 0000o00 0O�OUvOO O0OO0Oo0 'or0g0o0000 O60o O o Of,o OOOOo0?900-n 9'9'. 1// _96_0.9_4 II1 IIIX \ X96MOW 60I �1 LINE I \ ® I \ I I I I I IIr- II I MOW X 961.7 /X1.0 1 1 I I Q0(0 I I I I I 96� 1•Q1 \1�- \ rn (y)I II / �.� 11 I ;�N LINE II I I � I� BUILDING C BUILDING IF QO 0 I;�bti`'j 11 X 960.6 1 li w X X 963.9 964.5 x I j �6�1° II! / 6, 9 76 SF ~ I ' 0 Ii 1962 `°I X960 �1 9638 I i i:i I O 9625°i V " I Wo 11 -NCE FFE=963.50 FFE=963.50 0 11 964\ I I ,coJI �I®C ' 109 0 II gi12ON �LINE 109 0 1I VCI aI ' I I X 961 9 o \6 4 btiI i ;I I I 1 I \ M 1I I II O" ' 963 - ---- -------- X 963-9sr--=-_-_-- X95.61 =----- 96 o \ I X 963.8 s° .0 96 I I0,/ I O V 1 I I I • \ \ I +�9 N�6ry. q6�• 62 /I I � � ti' ---`SINS 1 i FF ° \j 'Po 96 it \ X�'v X � 5�.5 I g6� 0 `10 ° 6�ti lad 62 X20 \ \ X62.31 0'6� \� q6��9 q �9 lir- 0959.4 X 963.8 ° it \ I j' • 196 I • ?`'° ✓tl ti�o �°°61.4 -962 9.g62 ti I __- CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER + c6o qC` o - I 1 T96ti°1 i1 rn I 5.1 FT. EAST OF LOT LINE ►I 14= 6 \ 59.0\ \\ \ \ 963.4x / X 962.7' III I I I �91 6--°---------- --------- ----------------------��- -- 963 I -------- --- --- •---- 963 --------- ii�1 I I II \ \\ I h 0 1 \ \ \ \ 109 X 961.3 0 II I I I \\ \ \\ \X 962.4 / 109 / 0 Q I I \ CHAINLINK ---�^ 9''2• III X 961.8 961.2 X / j / 0 II I I I FENCE + ON LOT LINE. 110 I1. /' o \. J �/ �'9o a \ \ rn X 960.5 CD O10I !!� CA 6250. BUILDING E BUILDING F • 9 976 SF o f I 1 \ X 958.6 6,976 SF 6' 0 1i I I� I I • 0 I 1 1 (ten I FFE=963.50 I I X �60.4 1 FFE=963.50 0 96�y� ; �-, 0 , I' 6 X 961.5 X 9 ,}� , rd --5.1 i 9l, 962.50'4I _ I / � v u v-O'O I X962.6 (� -'-t1T,°a °�0O°'°°°°ago°po°a° I v u u o 0 0 0 0 0"0"'0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a o 0 o v u u o 0 0 0 0 0 0'"'0"'0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • o / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o --7 / _ A I I \\ _I x Yo,�j.8 Imo' 1 • ° - \ X6.5. \ X 958.7 I � I� I 1 `- . . . . . r \ 9e, °� \ \ I q(°hti / 96''0 " a \ PO C) 96, I I_ - 961.4 A X 961.3 0 ! ; 96\ .4 Q 11 �� x I -°6�� I Ir i 12. r I o I \ � t o \ 1 O o 0 a 0 O a a o a°°°O°a°O°a° h° 1 I /\ , q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 „0„0„0.0.0.0.0 ,�, I +- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 1 , 0 0 0 0,,,0,_,0°0°0°0°0 00°0000000,0„0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 moo` 9 i ° o_o_o n 0 �6 ! / ,9, , ® \ 1 I X 959.9 °I' 0 ! I I X 961.0 I I � II s I X 961.3 c II I I o I o ' I I �i E I ° i til ° F�� \ BUILDING H " 0 �� _ ,4t I X 962.7 q6 I- Q BUILDING G �� \ `° 0 ti' 11 - s F° U; 6 I I a 6,976 SF I 6,976 SF x ° \- II 9� II < 962.3 \ ^,I I II I ' ii I II ! ;; a CHAINLINK --� 6 2. 3 ; ;; �' \\ FFE-963.50 FENCE +\- 11 slll 4 FFE=963.50 - I 1 '1I I' I' X 960.7 \ 1 0.5 FT. WEST 109 II! o I OF LOT LINE. II 109 �° I i \ AL I I if (0 962.301 0 N � `\\0\1 11967.80 �/' I K I %9T5 962.6X ' oN 962.9x, - C U) �6 y _ 1 X 967.2 X (\\\ CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER + \- lel c 0.4 FT. WEST OF LOT CORNER�� -- N 89 °14'00" E \ l AL I 1 I I I �--=--- ---- --- �; ego N o --------- Y I --- - ��� ---�-------- -- 2♦- T=-----�- I90L� i I % Cl) \ \ \ ° X 960.6 O \ O ro° 1' ' /: / I g01.8 1, _ X 901.1 I I 60 \ 6 I \ r0`L' `aPl'' I 96� } 0 �C6o I I I +o c 951.7 X62. ryti 2 i° I , i Oro ! ! 9 o �o X 962.4 LG ' g62/-9 s�6' ------------� I- O 0� 6' O S 0 __-___ Aft ___________ ------------------- ----- °'-------------------- r---------- ��� -,rte-- 962 �1 ter_+_________��y��y�r-•_- I - C i_ 1 131.) , . 9�Z.0 0 959 s° LANDSCAPE 0� 960.959 x \ I t; 958 957- ss \ +�6°I ; --EDGING/MULCH 956 11 956 e�' s \ �g6; -- CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER + \- o �--�_°� _ / �� 962.2X____9 X961.8 �s; ;' 5.8 FT. EAST OF LOT LINE _ 1- I ' ° / °'1� " ' 960_9 ---SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST 956 f\ X aFP � ��956 r 957 �'! ��-� I 957 _ _ 958 s0 1� I 1/4 OF SECTION 14, T. 121, R. 25 • - I N 89°14'00" E _- -----3123. �-_=------- i ------ 1899.53---- 9642 ° ° ' _ --------------- 2' =_ �_- -----ic� o ° °,.,°�°�Q.,� 6-- 963.7 I,-, ------ - / ° ° a s� P_-- o 0 8 O °° �- R -------------------961- ��,g6 _1 °o° 3 ___MOW -�� °�Q-- LE - - - - - SHED 2-- 1 - `I` -TC 958.9 - - - LINE- �;'- -_-_ X961._6961 - _ - - - - - 960 \� _ _ - C0` ' -960 X 960.2 OhO� CHAINLINK FENCE \ \ \959 OhOv 2 5 �� SL CHAINLINK FENCE L -TEL. LANDSCAPE X 6.0 FT HEIGHT -X 1 \Q�AT 6. 0.O FTFT HEIGHT 1\ RISER EDGING/MULCH EDGING, ROM LAND APROPERTYFLI E ADEN EAGLE ROADChi '�� LL PROPERTY LINE =SOUTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL SAN MH - - - & SHRUBS I PARK (DOC.# 275353) AS MONUMENTED; ALSO X I NORTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF KLEIN FARMS ELEV.=958.59--\T958.7 I ESTATES 2ND ADDITION (DOC.# 753470) F -- -----I------1 \ F__ A F-) A Fr_ (` _T_ A I _T_ F__ �` �`��' �G n I I� i A n F-'� I -T- I I\ I I I I M + -W -' i a. 3 .0 i i MP -90 . � %6 (612) 599-8G75 AwEawaaj- 0 30 60 90 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET SURVEY DATA SURVEY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY: MEYER ROHLIN LAND SERVICES 708 1st AVENUE NE BUFFALO, MN 55313 DATED: APRIL 18, 2017 BENCHMARK: MN/DOT GEODETIC MONUMENT "8605 S" ELEVATION = 966.55 NAVD88 DATUM PROJECT LOCATION PART OF THE SW41 AND NEj, SECTION 14 TOWNSHIP 121, RANGE 25, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA. EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 2, BLOCK 3, OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA. KEY QNTY SIZE ABM 6 2.5" BB LG 5 2.5" BB BHS 25 6' BB DS 104 #1 pot KFG 32 #1 pot LANDSCAPING NOTES NAME Maple, Autumn Blaze Linden, Greenspire Spruce, Black Hills Daylily, Stella Grass, Karl Foerster The landscape contractor must comply with all applicable federal, state, county, and local regulations governing landscape materials and work. All plant materials will be guaranteed for a period of one year from time of final acceptance from owner. Trees and perennials to be installed with suitable planting soil and fertilizer. Commercial black poly edging to be installed between turf areas and rock beds. 1.5"diameter river rock to be installed at 3"depth in all perennial beds over fabric weed barrier. All trees planted in turf areas to receive a 4' diameter mulch ring. Mulch to be shredded natural hardwood installed 6"deep with no mulch in contact with the tree trunk. Turf areas to be sodded with a locally grown bluegrass blend sod. Native seeding areas to be seeded with a native seed mix to be approved by the owner. Underground irrigation shall be provided for trees, shrubs, and sod areas. 1B• POLVPROPMEIE OR Z= DP) E- 1-1/2 W Pgv~i N[ a DOMBIE STRAND 14 OA. YM - 21xfaN7 (w a. �TIa' 3`0 120' MERVAL (TYP.) ITaY1 TT►J - I TREE WRAP lD FIRST aMROR TURNBUCKLE VEIN DOUBLE STRAND ' �7N[ �w To rwr awa /14 GAUGE Iw3 PER ll 1» wOOLii R a00�iw s SUM STAKE r nBa UNB 4'-!' LAYER OF SH EDDED HARDWOOD MULCH N SAUCER -EXTEND PAST STAKE WEItlQADE 70LA-111111! OF EORIGINAL. N aAllal-paN MR RAA[ alatrr a ar Ur APAW _. TER RML AT A a - a Ea Y&YW STAKES SET 120' APART . . _ _.�-_ - 0111BbE 71E BNL AT AIIdE - 3 PER e MIN NAMNN EL �" TREE 2' IN t /, LRm,AL Br � I y_ Nf , - ,..-..-.... BAC*'LL wTH PLANING BDL 1 aonlulao >N• I h 2' ''"1r a[L ( KWITAN PEDESTAL OF I�D KRDISIUEOL I l NO R TWJ PLIERNAIE METIDDS CP TPfE STAKING PRE SHOMM. IT IS TIE C -A -'S OPTION TO STAKE TREES: HO -R, TIE CONIRACTIXV IS RESPWSIBIE POR TIE MAINTAINING MEES IN A PLUMB POSTW NII -T TIE CUARANT:E PE SCA- BOTTOM AND SIDES OP HOLE PRM TO PLANTNC. CONIIQ TO HAAS SHREDDED HPRDMWD MULCH UNUE onlw.. Nona. NO MULW TO BE IN CONTACT WTH TRUNK. CONIFEROUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL NOTES: TWO ALTERNATE METHODS OF TREE STAKING ARE SHOWN. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S OPTION TO STAKE TREES: HOWEVER, THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTAINING TREES IN A PLUMB POSITION THROUGHOUT THE GUARANTEE PERIOD. SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF HOLE PRIOR TO PLANTING DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL HAND LOOSEN ROOTS OF CONTAINERIZED MATERIAL (TYP.). SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF HOLE PRIOR TO PLANTING. SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL PAST ffrAKE KD SOL F INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: CO PROJECT LOCATION PLAN C1 SITE PLAN C2 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN C3 SANITARY AND WATER UTILITY PLAN C4 STORM SEWER UTILITY PLAN C5 LANDSCAPE PLAN C6 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C7 EXISTING CONDITIONS AND REMOVALS PLAN C8 DETAILS C9 PHASING PLAN Qz I -S < �CL J zCL C J Iz og CL a o (n O 00 a°i y m M r I L I Li +� N 0) N C' CI Q o a N p Lo0 E 0 4 �co� I o a�-6 I 0 () Ln 2 ti W oLo LO -renn vJ oY A I mm °CO °'E a ° O W 44 W U UO L lel U� � O C O Uo3 00 a� cl� U )10 CL 00 O -� 4-1 - O f K� a� r 0 J Ci a1 Q_ UJ V ° ° O v J Qz I -S < �CL J zCL C J Iz og CL a o (n O 00 a°i y m M m I L t +� N 0) N C' CI Q o a W v p Lo0 E 44 Wj �co� I o a�-6 I i o 2 ti W oLo oY A I mm °CO °'E a ° O 44 W U UO L lel U� 4j -p toy° � Uo3 00 )10 I _11'J S K� a� r 0 J Ci a1 ca IF V ° ° O q)- 3 L Q- Q t " o q, ° QL W 101 FILE NO. 00633 CS Landscape Plan (n O m o m o W a W ti 0 Q o a W v FILE NO. 00633 CS Landscape Plan I I � 1 DUN DASROAD xc�o 10" D.I.P. ROCK CONSTRUCTION o I I i 1 15" R.C.P. `ENTRANCE INLET , 00 o S 1 � C PROTECTION IN MH 00 \ o I v �6, 1, (TYP-) M ELEV.=960.04 SAN MH I - I �g6 �o� 96 .00 _ �,.V. ELE�V,.=942.8 RIM ELE I ) ( - ) - - '��°°°- 960°so) (, °° I `959.79 INLET 961.11 6 DIA. 0.66 `� 6 INV. ELE PROTECTION �° �- - - f BIO -LOG ___ _ -- 1--I ss ' --%* 9 {-'` SILT FENCE 1 TYP. q6�- AS ' - -- - - - - e gig- - ( ) 1 1-- * ,p -...- -- �uv yov - - �_-�s0 ._-T) --/ I X95�.� I • II 959.7. _ r x_959.3 °s+ 9 8 RISER 1 960.6 X -j nb.�% r�L -T �S7 i-�� T T - 960 - T T - T T rf J^\7�) g 1\'T� -96'0 -q`°_ - `'Q-� - -95: +-� ^ _�> ___J 961 ice; i y q - ---- --- - -- _ _ _ --- -•' -- - L 6_r , -yb�-- - �� uY Viz.=---�-f 962.1 962 ==--_ �� - - - _--- -�=_ --- - -i - -- - -- _ 6 „ IA - 5 - -��l i 61.5 04 �' ;9 X 9 g am_- u Y . �sX- - \ D . s.0 1. a6 � A ;1 1-T�tii Sts 4 �o - ASO /BIO -LOG i1 INLET I\ INLET INLET o o g _ _ �o PROTECTION 1 7 11 PROTECTION ,�o- PROTECTION s6 - cp _ -1,��- , (TYP.) I "1 -5 (TYP.) "g6 EASE (TYP_) 963.0 96 /�, % r X 9 E'2.9 \ I X ?63. 1' 962.8X Q - ?20�� �1 1 \ 96J96� ;6 \0, 62. � 1 �° �i2'9 IIr 0I e 6 0 >� N I I I I ti ----------'-- q- ------------------ ----- 963 - I 1 m I � • � III iq6-------- •------------- � --.963-'-�----. -- _ � 1 I ISI I I a i 1 = I IITIr 109 109 - I! SILT FENCE 1'll SILT FENCE � 62151' \ qro ; - BUILDING B ;; 1 ;� X61.9 \ �\ 9 1,2.15 �; BUILDING A �g62 ;; 6, 976 SF I 963.1 X) o I I II 6,976 SF I I f# \\ \, / X 964.2 \ � INLET , , 1 I PROTECTION 63.50 \ \� I 1 0 1' \ w X 96 6� �'- FFE=963.50 (TYP.) \ I 1:16ti�! 1; I �� I X 6".3 \I I s62s01 \ X 961.9 962.0 1 rn \ I \; 4j „ \ P q u u u o 0 0"0"0"0�0" o'"'o"ouou 0000000000000'0000' o 0 o \ i /I�\"o'"'o'"'o"o"ouo°o°o°o°oi"0400 Ooo'"o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 \h M W ` JOOOOOOOOy0o0000000000 oOnO O O,�OCO„O,.O_O_o_n..n n 1 S ^� o I I LIME79s� A0 I. \\ �' I _ 963.7 96 .5 X ' / 1 g6�' -' -' - - o I � s67 , ca ca X1961j8X 963.7 t 1 I r-'-'-'- o o �; Ise .-.-. .-.-. ti = co try 4. .-.-.-._.._... � I INLET \ \ I.1 ° I S ;INLET N ;� \ 964.3 I I I INLET PROTECTION PROTECTION I (�•P) co tP1I I PROTECTION ` - _ °° I. �. 6 TYP. I I rn I (TYP.) _ 1 o 0 0 0- - 1.- 0 ononon0, O'�O�o_0 0 0 \ I 9'.� - o0 000000000000000000 0 --- X , uJo-0000000000,000oo0o_O_onnn 6 I I 0 0 0 0"O"O"0 o` n �O O- f,OrO O..O,.O,.O _ o_ o n ' i ,� 6? I / 000000„On0n0nO..O..Oe�O o . n n �+ flo, . (� fir' ' 1 960.9 4 I I < IX 96 MOW -�� s so,- 963� LINE MOW I I I I I y X 961.7 �IX96I.0 X ell I\�LINE `° SILT FENCE ,I Ii I / �,��°n .C5 BUILDING D 1 0 ;'°' ;I I I I I, I i BUILDING C ;�: 6 976 SF ��ti�l 9611 ;� X 960.6 I I w X x 963.9 0 1 •� 964.5 X I I I 11 1113 j;� C° 6, 9 76 SF I� 1962 `0 . I� X 960. 96�� SILT FENCE -I� I, iii I g625p� � INLET 963.50 ! " I I I I I -- WO ' F -N CE FFE = 963.50 PROTECTION I co (TYP.) , W 1 I I 964TH �1 CO 1� + \- li 109 4 II 1 °j Q I rn I rn I \-9.��2.,�ON 1,_��T LINE ucF+ 109 a e° II IA o I ry I X 9F1 .5 / 4 96ti• '1 0 l I . n 1 1 1 \ -_ 9 6 3 7- ----------------- - - ----- - --_- �__-O 963.-_.. ----_ ----------- ---s ---------96, o , X95 61 �9s28�== � I I a�° I � 3I ; � 96W o I \ \ I X 963.8 I \ I 9 \ 1 \ # ' \--- 0:I 1 'i 1 �o I II 62001, \\\ 1\, `IO° \q6��0 g6�h0 \ 96%iI� II I ti' \�• \ - �\`1 'ss�d qoq s?`0 1 96 7 1 '\ O X 5.51 gfON q6�' 962 21, - \\ X 9594 1 g X 963.8 7 I +Il ', '9 62.31 q 1 - .._._ _ q, __._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._. ------ ,• »- M- »--» » --« - -M - C-» - »- »- »- -N- � o � U I I _ °;.-._.-._._._..-._.-._._I_._._._._._.-._.__962 -----+ ----. ..__. �° 5o I yo 1 1'I 11 96,, / ti_�°_ ��� _ I INLET ��=-----�6�'61.4 I 9s2� �hX 1�1 INLET AINLINK FENCE CORNER + \- 6 r ti c FT. EAST OF LOT LINE � - .9 �. 0:' o c PROTECTION �1 INLET ! PROTECTION I o ° ; PROTECTION \ I 1 (TYP.) \% �I q I 1 (TYP.) 963.4 ,1 (TYP.) \ I i N1.0 \ I 96� 1 11 11 o p�y.0 X X 962.7 ; I 962 f 1 0 \ i 6 i I ------- _-z-I- _ =�i-- °\ ti \-- g- ---- -- a-----�--- =k-- -_ 963 ---- �9 I \ \ q�-------t--------- ----- --- I- - cam. 9 63 ------------------ Ir --- ----- ----- I - i=---- - I 1, Y 11 6'iI, � I I I \ \ \ \ \ / I I I 1 I\ \\ � o,`°III !I a� 109 X 961.3 II Q:1:1 I 11 \\ \ \\ \X 962.4 II 109 # I \ • I;; X 961.8 I ./ o I \ CHAINLINK 9'2' 9612 X \ \� FENCE + \- 1 1 �' # J �� 11 ��° 1 \ Qo ON LOT LINE. 110 11 / o \, / ;96 ! o SILT FENCE on X 960.5 6�. I .;�y� BUILDING F v 1I I g6ry�ol - 1 \\ o BUILDING E 962 ' , 6, 9 76 SF CO , ; I - o \ x 958.6 SILT FENCE 1 ��I CD 6,976 SF .al, INLET I 1 \ PROTECTION1 1 ; I X 60.4 X63 11 FFE=963.50 .50 16yy° 1 (TYPI . ) +9 1 X 961.5 I -� X 9Uy +, �- --5.1 A\ -Cs 1 1 962.50x )61.,' , ; 1 co I 14 i _ u u u o 0 0 0 0 0 0' 'o"'o �� " v u o 0 0 0 0'"0' o'" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0_0_0_0_ I X 962.6 f I v v u O O "0'"'0`''000000000 00Q_C98o8000000000n0 O �O OI�O O_O_O_o�n n 1 ,,,, 0 u U -o -o-030"0"0•`0'" o"O O Ono„0 O O O O_o_O-O_o n n 1 I 1 _ 1 �,' s�o I I \ 6�` 8 i q 9 X 958.7 7:�I.-•- 96��-'-4740 '-' I' o \ ti ssr \ s o 1 oti 0�Q o \ i1 6''so q6"'� 9 :• .q - •---------------------------------------- - �----' - \ I do rn \ Iil INLET -U� I INLET 0 PROTECTION INLET PROTECTION X 961.3 o ! 1 TYP. 1ti1 N PROTECTION \ _ i (TYP.) 11 = I \ I --- (TYP.) _q6� 1 I I o .9,2rrn (TYP.) i1 1' s?s,,✓� I -,„-- - ----"\ �.h 1!I 1 o0O0"0"0"0 o? s 1 1 X 959.9 0,1 961.0 X 961.3 r, O \ h. I X �6ti`h �'. I BUILDING G , •.;���°\ BUILDING H bry;+ " I I 962.7 f o B I q o I 6,976 SF 1 6,976 SF x 9616 ! ;; - -- 5• I + \- f1< 962.3 INLET '1 I 11 I CHAINLINK --� 'AI962.3 ; 11 1 \ 11 ! 11 o SILT FENCE PROTECTION 963.50 11 11 FENCE +\- 11 s 11 I FFE=963.50 (TYP.) 11 I 1 I I X 960.7 0.5 FT. WEST 1 1 109 1 o I OF LOT LINE. =u1 I, 109 I �1�s 1 =_ -- --- 1 % N ° SILT FENCE0�2.(0� 0 g6I I ' 6 \ loci I .; I 961 901.1 1 `�. 0° I \ bti' 6�' ��\� •4 ! ii X 960.6 961.80 ` ' 6ti' �q6� ' i kq q C 951.7 g6ti' 'x-25" s `6?� �q I I °tij !; 1.9 5 It?130 ° X 962.4 I I INLET CP 96� 1 6h s 1---- PROTECTION i6 - -- 0 ! ss 0 I 6 1 ' ` q--------------------------------� LO 962.6X ' oNyo --------__________- � e I (TYP. ) 962.9X ---- - - - - qb� ------ ' ----------'--ti=---- r- 96 ------------ wt.�r-ter 's w ----------------��.�.962 - - - - - - - - r� - - - - - - - ,ice- ��I rn ---------------------- ------ I .960 - r -- 1Anincr\AE)r7 959 o :INLET X INLET '258 \ EMERGENCY OVERFLOW PROTECTION y 957 - se EROSION CONTROL \ PROTECTION p o I 956 so l s0 0 / I43. (TYP,) J� = 90BLANKET MNDOT CATS )RNER + \- ^�1 I 9s (TYP.) o's x-- INLET+97 8 FT x 12 FT; , '00 INLET o 7VL.L \6s ; T LINE 967.2 X `\ INLET / PROTECTION I 962 PROTECTION °' INSTALL AT FINAL PROTECTION (TYP.) (TYp) t'� GRADING; STAPLE BLANKET OF THE NORTHEAST CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER + \- -,l 11 (NP) - _ - 956 957 - - Y gF?.3 958'. awl �j �6's0 1\ TO SECURE IN PLACE TION 14, T. 121, R. 25 0.4 FT. WEST OF LOT CORNER �Tr-T'�. 959 958 - 960 95c 9n:. \-�1 N 89°14'00" E ° l -. N 89 14 00 E - 960 - X 9n_�_ ; 99.53------ _ % X- ---_-- �✓1-'----r-------------_ - ------=-=y 962 J31 N 964.2��.� ,_.-- ----� ti L -- - --^ ---`_ _----------------------- ------------------ �<s�_ X - -0�``-��- �_6/�`�--X- - C / ° °� X961.3 X o o o 1,96 -- ----- ` %--lL`�- 1 ��0 s� -__MOW-,-_o o �o°`3Q- R�F�y ----- -----961- �a ,96 -�� °°° __��-,`36 ° _ `-- - - LINE �,%'� 96_0\\���-C 958.96 = Crr _SILT FENCE - ��' - -SHED 2-= - 61# - - X I X 961.6-961 _ 960 h��q�,.r � hw CURB 960.5 X ! -TEL.LANDSCAPE o,2 S9� STOP 1 X X \ \\ RISER EDGING/MULCH LANDSCAPE- GOLDEN EAGLE ROAD h�. ' ��CB � �h EDGING/ROCK °' �LEV.=958.16- - _-=SOUTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL � r- - - - - - -r - - - - - PARK (DOC.# 275353) AS MONUMENTED; ALSO & SHRUBS SAN MH X �� I NORTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF KLEIN FARMS ELEV�958.59 -- .\ 958.7 I ESTATES 2ND ADDITION (DOC.# 753470) �--I------- -----I- -1 I I � A F-) A Fr_ (` � A I�� �` �h�G n I I ! A F_'� h► I S I n N I I I IMPERVIOUS AND DISTURBANCE AREAS EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA 2,822 SF = 0.06 ACRES PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA 150,032 SF = 3.44 ACRES >> 78.2% NET IMPERVIOUS AREA INCREASE 147,210 SF = 3.38 ACRES PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA 41,800 SF = 0.96 ACRES >> 21.8% DISTURBANCE AREA 200,441 SF = 4.60 ACRES EROSION CONTROL QUANTITIES ITEM: QUANTITY UNIT ROCK ENTRANCE 1 EA SILT FENCE 1,602 LF INLET PROTECTION 22 EA BIOLOG 6" DIA 30 LF BLANKET MNDOT CAT 5 96 SF SWPP NARRATIVE This project construction will consist of site clearing, grading, utilities, building, parking lot, drive aisles, and truck court. First, perimeter silt fence and inlet protection shall be installed. Then site work shall commence. The contractor shall dispose all debris off-site within 24 hours. Then the site can be graded, utilities installed, buildingconstructed curbing and pavements installed � 9 final grade tollerance, and landscape final stabilization. Once final grade is established and certified, the site shall be stabilized with seed and mulch or sod. Once vegetation is established, temporary erosion control measures shall be removed. RUNOFF ROUTING OFFSITE Downstream water bodies receiving storm water runoff from the project site: Storm water that is discharged from the site is routed into the existing roadside ditch of Dundas Road on the north side of the site. Discharge in the roadside ditch of Dundas Road drains east approximately 750 feet and discharges to City of Monticello designated existing north -south ditch/channel. Discharge in the ditch/channel drains north approximately 1,500 feet into a City of Monticello designated regional pond located on the north side of Chelsea Road, just west of Fallon Avenue at the City's water reservoir site. Discharge from the City of Monticello regional pond drains approximately 3,300 feet to the north through a series of natural drainage ways and city storm sewer to the Mississippi River. POLLUTION PREVENTION NOTES Solid waste: collected sediment, asphalt and concrete millings, floating debris, paper, plastic, fabric, construction debris and other wastes must be disposed of properly off-site and must comply with MPCA requirements. Hazardous materials: oils, gasoline, paint, and any hazardous substance must be properly stored, including secondary containment, to prevent spills, leaks or other discharge. Restricted access to storage areas must be provided to prevent vandalism. Storage and disposal must be in compliance with MPCA regulations. External washing of trucks or other construction vehicles is not allowed on site. No engine degreasing is allowed on site. Concrete truck washout is not to be allowed on site unless washout waste is contained with no discharge to ground surface or site drainage facilities. Containment systems are to be located a minimum 50 feet away from drainage facilities and watercourses. Containment systems shall have an impermeable liner. Containment system shall be clearly marked with signage. All sanitary waste must be collected from portable toilet units on site by a licensed waste management contractor. The units must be secured and shall be maintained on a regular basis as needed to prevent overfilling. SOIL BED PREPARATION Prepare the soil surface to provide a smooth, moist, and evenly textured foundation before sowing seed or placing sod. Complete the tilling after applying soil amendments to the soil. Use cultivating equipment such as disks, harrows, field diggers, or tillers capable of loosening the soil to a depth of at least 6 in on all areas except for slopes steeper than 1:2 (V:H). Till the soil surface to remove track imprints from wheeled or tracked equipment. Operate cultivating equipment on slopes at right angles to the direction of surface drainage. Soil clods, lumps, and tillage ridges 3 in high may remain in place for seeding operations. Soil clods, lumps and tillage ridges 1.5 inch high may remain in place for sodding operations. Multiple passes of the equipment may be needed to meet these requirements. FA 0 30 60 90 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET SURVEY DATA SURVEY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY: MEYER ROHLIN LAND SERVICES 708 1st AVENUE NE BUFFALO, MN 55313 DATED: APRIL 18, 2017 BENCHMARK: MN/DOT GEODETIC MONUMENT "8605 S" ELEVATION = 966.55 NAVD88 DATUM PROJECT LOCATION PART OF THE SW41 AND NEj, SECTION 14 TOWNSHIP 121, RANGE 25, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA. EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 2, BLOCK 3, OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA. EROSION CONTROL NOTES 1. All devices necessary to control erosion and sediment (I.E. perimeter silt fence, rock construction entrances, swales, ponds, berms, ETC.) shall be installed prior to any other construction operations. 2. After completion of final grading, exposed soils must be permanently stabilized within 7 days. Stabilization shall consist of disc -anchored seed & mulch, HECP with fiber reinforced matrix, erosion blanket with seed, or sod. 3. The site must be kept in a well drained condition at all times. The contractor shall be responsible for temporary ditches, or other means necessary to ensure proper drainage. The building pad must be provided with a positive outflow. This work shall be incidental to the grading contract. 4. Entering/exiting of the site shall occur only at rock construction entrance to reduce tracking of dirt onto paved streets. Sediment tracked onto streets during working hours must be reclaimed via street scraping and sweeping at the end of each working day. 5. Stormwater discharge pipe outlet energy dissipation shall be provided by rip -rap with size, quantity, and placement in accordance with City standards. Rip -rap installation shall be within 24 hours of pipe installation. 6. Install silt fence around all temporary inactive stockpiles which are not place within existing silt fence area or other perimeter erosion controls. 7. Stabilization of temporary or permanent drainage ditches that drain water from the construction site must be initiated within 24 hours of connecting the drainage ditch to any storm water conveyance system and must be completed using erosion blanket. 8. Sufficient personell, equipment, and materials shall be mobilized within 24 hours of written order (ie. email) by the owner or owners representative to conduct corrective work and install temporary erosion control work in the case of an emergency. EROSION CONTROL INSTALLATION SCHEDULE 1. Silt fence shall be installed or restored prior to any construction. Silt fence shall be located as shown to intercept runoff. The area located beyond the perimeter silt fence shall not be disturbed during construction. 2. Rock Construction Entrance shall be installed prior to grading operations. 3. All storm sewer inlets shall have inlet protection inserts installed. Inserts shall be "Road rain -Top Slab" or "Road Drain -Curb & Gutter" inlet protection devices as manufactured by WIMCO (or approved equal) and installed per manufacture's recommendations. 4. All erosion control installations shall remain in place and be maintained in good condition by the contractor until the site has been re -vegetated, at which time it shall be removed by the contractor. For proposed paved surface areas, the contractor may remove necessary silt fencing to construct roadway, while maintaining adequate erosion control in adjacent areas. 5. Sufficient topsoil shall be stockpiled to allow for the replacement of 4" topsoil for disturbed areas to be re -vegetated. 6. The contractor shall schedule site grading, utility installation and roadway construction so that the general site can be mulched and re -seeded soon after disturbance. Areas that will not be subject to construction traffic shall be seed and mulched or sodded within 72 hours of final grading. EROSION CONTROL MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE 1. Erosion control measures shall be inspected by the contractor's representative and maintained by the contractor every Friday and within 24 hours after any rainfall event larger than 1/2" until the project is completed. Maintenance requirements are as follows: silt fence - 1/3 height of fence or damaged, remove sediment and/or repair fence within 24 hours; rock entrance - refresh as necessary to conform to detail; inlet protection inserts - remove sediment after each rain event, clean or replace filter when clogged; surface water - drain and stabilize, within 7 days of discovery; and street sweeping - remove all sediment tracked onto paved surfaces within 24 hours or as directed by City Engineer. 2. Replacement - Fabric shall be replaced promptly when it decomposes or becomes ineffective before the barrier is no longer necessary. 3. Any sediment remaining in place after silt fence is no longer required shall be dressed to conform with the existing grade, prepared, and seeded with appropriate seed mix, as directed by the engineer. 4. Removal of the silt fence- Silt fences shall be removed when they have served their useful purpose, but not before the upward sloping area has been permanently stabilized. VEGITATION GROUND COVER SCHEDULE 1. Stabilization of all exposed soil areas must be initiated immediately but in no case completed later than seven (7) days after the construction activity in that portion of the site has temporarily or permanently ceased. 2. Permanent turf ground cover shall include all disturbed areas be covered with a minimum 4" topsoil and sodded or seeded as allowed by City, or as proposed on City approved landscape plan for the project. 3. Temporary ground cover shall be MnDOT seed mix 150 shall be applied at 100 lbs/ac, or equivalent as approved by City. MnDOT Type 1 mulch shall be applied at 2 tons/ac and disc anchored in areas not covered by sod or erosion blanket. 4. Fertilizer shall be MnDOT Type 1 10-10-20 and applied at 200 lbs/ac. Disc fertilizer into top 3" of soil. Specification reference is MnDOT 2575. 5. Dormant seed mix shall be used after November 1 or when temperatures do not exceed 40° F, using same rates specified above. No seed shall be placed on snow or ice greater than 2" in depth. 6. Any seeded areas that do not become established with vegetation shall be reseeded at Contractor's expense. 7. Erosion blanket shall be installed in seed areas with ground surface slopes of 4H:1V or steeper. RESPONSIBLE PARTY Contact information for the responsible party for erosion control is: TO BE DETERMINED INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: CO PROJECT LOCATION PLAN C1 SITE PLAN C2 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN C3 SANITARY AND WATER UTILITY PLAN C4 STORM SEWER UTILITY PLAN C5 LANDSCAPE PLAN C6 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C7 EXISTING CONDITIONS AND REMOVALS PLAN C8 DETAILS C9 PHASING PLAN Q) W Q U� 0� O Ld�z Q J Q OCL -� CL zoo U_ LLJ CLOS a Z 4 (n O aqi 15; 00 W O -4-; Q) W Q U� 0� O Ld�z Q J Q OCL -� CL zoo U_ LLJ CLOS a Z 4 (n O aqi 15; 00 1,°i y m M m o W a N � (� ca N O Q O O Its'' ,, W V p LOC) E 4 � WC;fj �co� I o a�-6 1 i o 2 0LO s' CX o a A I mm on Ej q) c 44 44 Com ` oaf N oOcu Q.CZ�� �00 poi �� S. tea) J S O ) � Co O q)- 3 a- t " o q, ° W is FILE NO. 00633 Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan 4 (n O m o m o W a O Q O O Its'' ,, W V FILE NO. 00633 Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan I � 1 I DUN DAS ROAD X , - I ----- - - - - 10 D.I.P. 15 °Q I CI_ C� �� G �_ o h END OF 6 AN MH 0o r7 - I 960 RIM ELEV.=960.04 \- o _ ci _ 6' �, (�) CULVERT I / 1 SAN MH 1 1 96 z o o Z_ o co 960.04 1i 959.90 INV. ELFDV.=942.8 RIM ELEV.=961.96 ��h I 961.11 � � � � G s�6, j BURIED X < SILT FENCE •0.66, _ _ -� - - - -� )` - K- 959.79 , INV. ELEV.=943.7 °� - - i - -_-_- - - _ _ - = - - - - - - - - - - X - - _-- _ - - _ \ /� �r 1 ,� � - �' 1 - -960- - - - - - < _- -959 _ - - - - SILT FENCE _i X95 I ---961-- 959.2X X >� -- - _ �X959.3 x�=_T "� - 960.6 X - js N - � rr - X 959.7. _ T-�9Sg3�T 1 T ' T T �T- -960 RISER- _ _ - ----====yb"I-------------i�`9s N,. \ ---0-961--------,�>-� --- - -- --o --962------- - 961.9 �__(bX----X----- �.= X 961.5 962.1-�4-----_--- ---X- -_--__6' - �---�- 961.5 �, X 962.9 --_X_------ �- r\----------- 962.5 962.4 24" CMP \\�\` 'UTILITY CULVERT EXISTING - I ; 963_ _ EASEMENT _ _ _ ,�- DRIVEWAY X 963.0 Q ; 4\ =� J X 962.9 _ - - X 963.1- _ - ACCESS TO X 962.5 X' 0 1 962.SX 962 9 -- MOW REMOVE EXISTING - PUBLIC STREET 962'3 LINE CULVERT m I �' I � = I SILT FENCE _ SILT FENCE X962.2 \ I o X962.2 �_--- --� X 963.5 w X 961.9 X61.9 1 \\ �t X 962.5 �,962 CO I\ 1\ \ 963.1 X \ p \ ` X 964.2 1 \, \ w X96 Q \ I\ X 961.9 J O�� \962.0 X 961.3 Q0 I \ � N \ I MOW \\ I >o \ 1 ----LINE 1 c \ I I m 963.7 X 96 .5 X 964.3 I I h I tPl I rn1 X 961.2 11 X> 962.5 1 X 961.7 960.9 MOW I iX96� IX96" / \ I I I LINE I 1 r- I I I 1 � I 1 ., ��, 7X961 0 X 961.0 \I�-- MOW I I I \ c0 / c-= EXISTING VELI TATION ,' LINE I I I x'962.0TO BE REMOVED ��� ��196 6016T FENCEEX 963.9 964.5 X I jI / I �� . /I X 960. J1 X 96�� 3 SILT FENCE -I� I, // / I 11 I I 1 .--"WOOD FENCE w I I 11 964 1 °j CORNER I \ 1 962.5 ON\ LOT LINE X 961.7 /// o I I X 961.5 I I I \ \ X 960.4 w I I 4 �\ \\ �J�1 X 960.7 960.5- I X95.611 \I IIX X 963.8 �o I I \ \ 9 I \�_------� f I \ X 5.51 I 6� X 962.3 \ j X959.4 �1-�I g X 963.8 r0 961.4 \ - )� 961.4 I _-_ -\,CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER + - I oo \ I a I I 5.1 FT. EAST OF LOT LINE I I CONCRETE I 59.0 X I SURFA CE I o I\ \ \ \ 963.4X X 962.7• I (APPROX.) I I I\\ \ \ \ .961 3 960.9 I II \\ \ \ \X 962.4 CHAINLINK ---�^ 962.5 ) X 961.8 961.2 I \ FENCE + \- //�� ON LOT LINE. / SILT FENCE rn X 960.5 I o REMOVE CONCRETE \\� 1960"91 I `\ X \ I SILT FENCE PAVEMENT `\ 0 1 \ 1 / I Q0 / 1 X 160.411 coo _X 961.5 X 960.9 --� - 5.1 \- X 961.8 � � - X 962.6 1� \\ 960.8 \ \ �967- EXISTING FENCE ON EXISTING FENCE ON \� \ �� o \ ADJACENT PROPERTIES � \\96' \ 11 TO REMAIN ADJACENT PROPERTIES TO REMAIN I \�� 961.4X X961.3 9 4 962.5 X 962.5 CONCRETE SURFACE X 959.9 (APPROX.) I�X961.0 \ 961.3 \ o I \ ° I \ X 962.7 \ I 1 X 961.3 __� -- 5. + \- ` X 962.3 1� CHAINLINK --� X 962.3 BROKEN \ a SILT FENCE FENCE + \- CONCRETE REMOVE CONCRETE I I X 960.7 0.5 FT. WEST PIECE a o I OF LOT LINE. PAVEMENT � I I SILT FENCE \� 961.5 I REMOVE GARDEN PLOTS AND _X,X 61. n1.1 X 960.6 / SHRUBS/TREES I 962.5 X 96 .4I i -MOW 1 0 I :-�-.� N� i LINE j 962.6X CONCRETE I + + + ., 0 962.9><, SURFACE I i '+'+'+'+'+'+)�-� \I (APPROX.) I ill+'+'+'+�+++! 0`<�a +'+'+I+�, 2.6 -MOW i , + + + cam+ + I , + + + +, 0 LANDSCAPE ~962. i LINE i I+++++.��++++{ `r+;c��S'p� �;+ --EDGING/MULCH v }+ +��++++ +''- ++++N +l 6\ -- CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER + BROKENMOW �` \ / \ ;++++++++ +++ ;++++++++a.,9 \- ,, ,,, ,� 962.2�r 4++++�C+961.8 ;+++++;�I I ' 1 X CONCRETE LINE� - _ - -9 ; +,+ + ++ t ,_ 1 5.8 FT. EAST OF LOT LINE 967.2 `,\\ PIECE �l ,-1----= =P`� 1 62\ \ �, :+� +% E A p 9 \� i M 0 W E D _� A R E A --1 p R'�0 96_ SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST Ili - - -963- - - - - ----------------------+ ,-_ -- r-,-- r-,-----,--�C 962.3 _ 1 114 OF SECTION 14, T. 121 CHAINLINKFENCE CORNER + \- t } + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +� .+ + + + + + + +++++++i E D � 0.4 FT. WEST OF LOT CORNER_\ II ^�� UTILITY- ++++++++++++++++++++++++GARDEN++++ +` ++++++++++; M 0 W \� I �- 1, N 89°14'00" E l '++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ + + + + + + + 961.8 N 89°14'00" E EASEMENT \ i - I_ X 6 _ _ _ _-_____-__�__-X__- - - +++++++++++ ;+++++_f + ------ 1B99.53----- ----------- --- - ---- ---� -- --C I + . + + 299.81 N 89°14'00„„-E + + + �-962.6--- - �o_-------- ------ I _ +++++++*_;_, 1899 9642 ,- o r r - -+ �'=---------------- I_ - �✓ / -�-�J=L.JX . I I 000e'l-0 - -_� - -------------------tel - - � X _ -gam_ _ _ _ C� It, / � � 961.3 �P2_ _ - j-963.7°°04o`r6`3Q - - �_O�961- �9 - 1 / 00000 3 MOW_, SILT FENCE -"\ETC 8.96 - r1T - - - - - -'\ ---SHED 62- - - LINE �: � FENCE \��-_------ ----- _� i X961.6g61 toX _ y -SQA =�t -- _ _ _ '� �'� 1 --- --�--- i_ -960- X960.2 oho' \ \ \959 �`��vSTOP 960.5 Xj !--TEL. LANDSCAPE X X \ \\ RISER EDGING/MULCH �lb LANDSCAPE - GOLDEN EAGLE 1� OA h�- -��CB t �h EDGING ROCK C �LEV.=958 16 _ --_SOUTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL - - - / PARK (DOC.# 275353) AS MONUMENTED; ALSO 8c SHRUBS EXISTING TREES AT TOP SAN MH X 1 I NORTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF KLEIN FARMS OF BERM ON ADJACENT - - - - _ ELEV =958.59 -- . 958.7 I ESTATES 2ND ADDITION (DOC.# 753470) PROPERTIES TO REMAIN I �, Ch I I/ _T_ A I_T_ F_ r-` �h� �G n I I� i A F--',\ h► I S I Report -Engineering Properties (MN) Map unit symbol and Pct, of Hydrolo Depth soil name map gic unit group 406 -Dorset sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent - slopes Dorset 80 6 in 0-11 11-20 20-38 38-79 0 30 60 90 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET SURVEY DATA SURVEY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY: MEYER ROHLIN LAND SERVICES 708 1st AVENUE NE BUFFALO, MN 55313 DATED: APRIL 18, 2017 BENCHMARK: MN/DOT GEODETIC MONUMENT "8605 S" ELEVATION = 966.55 NAVD88 DATUM PROJECT LOCATION PART OF THE SW4 AND NE4, SECTION 14 TOWNSHIP 121, RANGE 25, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA. EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 2, BLOCK 3, OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA. DEMOLITION NOTES 1. Install perimeter sediment controls as soon as possible during clear and grub operations. See Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan. 2. Provide air quality control measures at the request of the Engineer or City Representatives. Take necessary measures to keep dust levels to a minimum. Provide sweeping of adjacent paving as needed, or as required by the City Engineer. 3. Locate and protect all utility lines prior to and during demolition. Utility locations shown are based on best available information and are not guaranteed. Contact private utility service for disconnection and removal. 4. Remove or relocate all existing site features that interfere with the proposed construction. 5. Protect existing site features that are to remain during construction. Replace anything damaged with new construction. 6. Pavement shall be saw cut at limits of removal unless noted otherwise. Do not impede existing traffic circulation to adjacent businesses or streets. 7. Sufficient topsoil shall be stockpiled to allow for the replacement of 6" of topsoil in disturbed areas to be re-vegitated. 8. All construction and post -construction parking shall be on-site. At no time shall parking, loading, or unloading be allowed on public streets. 9. Storage of materials or equipment shall not be allowed within public Right -of -Way and shall be maintained on site within project boundaries. Engineering Properties (MN) -Wright County, Minnesota USDA texture Classification Fragments Unified AASHTO X10 3-10 S inches inches Pct Pct Sandy loam, fine SC -SM, A-2, A-4 0 0 sandy loam, loam Loam, sandy loam, coarse sandy loam Gravelly coarse sand, gravelly sand, very gravelly coarse sand, gravelly loamy sand Gravelly coarse sand, gravelly sand, very gravelly coarse sand, gravelly loamy sand Percentage passing sieve number- Liquid Plasticit limit y index 4 10 40 200 Pct 90-100 78-100 57-88 27-50 0-31 NP -10 Sc SC -SM A-6, 0 0 91-100 79-100 54-83 24-45 0-31 NP -11 A-2-4, A-4 SW -SM A -1-b, A-1 0 0-2 79-92 54-77 24-41 5-15 0-0 NP SW -SM A -1-b, A-1 0 0-2 80-93 56-78 24-42 5-15 0-0 NP Data Source Information NRCS Web Soil Survey NOTE: FIELD GEOTECHNICAL SOIL BORINGS AND ANALYSIS SUPERSEED NRCS WEB SOIL SURVEY DATA. 0�4 �m LM CU W O N an -an CC 0 (0 0) a to .CU oftoLft �ft c a '~ Z Z Co W W Ca w � O 0 a 0 Q �1•+ � r O cu LLU0L CO co oz� QOQ_ C J z�> -v0 i zCr. CLWQ 2 0 0 0 0o W W 0 a v INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: o CO PROJECT LOCATION PLAN FILE NO. 00633 C1 SITE PLAN C2 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN - -� - - - - - - C3 SANITARY AND WATER UTILITY PLAN C4 STORM SEWER UTILITY PLAN C5 LANDSCAPE PLAN C6 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C7 EXISTING CONDITIONS AND REMOVALS PLAN C 7 C8 DETAILS C9 PHASING PLAN Existing Conditions and Removals Plan f _ FID,e HSA Nn orraA,•.s rxeANnlwH Nxs_na u.rs Tic ru Nn om1u9 sero eE ra raAews 1 L. ALL HAAS lIAu.L R rLm 1-5/t' ` 1 : ALL NAL �w�0 F01e`im fi,Yl R xnte M WO RU TOw PFwVrLO IRaw We [AGE Or an D aOH WrS g1rNLy fFlis NIrERHNL all mrA/N1f AU- [u Nq °tvaAr vNu K rRW [wmaxr v Imtn m THE —T — of aWRP UwISS drAwTON ARIA 04, , Raf.aw m[PA' FOR COOAPLETE TYPE "A" DROP SECT]nN — wR OU! I ANLL WA.,.>< 00Mr. "VoM . 5.ICvu.[D Wn0 TME eR1>Sne I,wE OF TR.9ra. TDV ,NE rH AH[` nV7 •J W! NK'LVOE THE MA '�rR Or nE STr�Er sTPAn fm rwRKxl M4NNaIr IlaOx, 1q FTPr. C, sfi•.: a �• iui°oR or., Noe o Ria00 nc°rdMirK a[.oG swu x rim rw ananrm rawE Allo cmT:R ¢ L • R,4, IF J — .— — — — cxeH UNE sET9R"EN HVE Axn L CASD MAPanNo RHOS S --T wrri Na, viu NcESAIRIELSHM1E +T 4- MN! - 17• A/N[ y m `y jEeS A o A A �IBOC1 wNArOAEE "PH STAHaeRD FRAIQ & COVER 1 ® m ; .. _ ••`! 8 Is 1/E • iS' 1'r [�.• u EXGHrrKfN IAEA xr vw xN } Rda qr suREAcE G r�' J' r Acne ORO` 5EGFOM YNA91 {' W111 12' ((mslAu INrn.. stem r O ;.; CVRa K[r r1W[ Nq Me °Wi O gq MILL ANO 019aAY AREA AANi R 5' ON pal E,TERNY CHW�T 9FAL� ! �E u t STANDARD PUTS i0M N ( .. >- I� �� 5 rrlrHw Na. R -son -r L FOR COVFR RFO111RE1CNF$ }PEI = •..•• xN.L CONSIRUCigH SINLL 6E dLA55 II _J — PRECAST PIPE. EkCEPT 'DA MAY BE -- °, ASTM C 478 aaNCRETE RPE. SEE MODai STAI°NRD 8• CAST^w-PLACE • • PLATE 7006 [Na rCNGaE ORMAI Ai TDP T. H ASNCEE 5EC ION W °E 300"ONSL1, ^,: CONCRETE aR BOiIOY DF illls sECIgN]). CRSC-IH-PULE g PLAN TM c-a%Ct.AY x • CRETE orAASOHRySTRUCTUNCRLV W RUN 9UCruE raH ,EE i' i0 i0' iiLST PLte510N - � NS OCY.] ALtaRLO CNLY IF APPRWEp PLAN cunERurc ROAN ER OtS LarC,N [YO'ggounNe ro K 9ET Ore•Ar G+ N LEA Or PtC r C mare pRTER aLPATRH SUTCVT BR BASE 1' FROM VICWNFCINCONCRETE OOaHO,1SE REGItED GI ,' eDNCRErr CGtLut NL SrDPM SEWER CASTNC nEMTxwi SAMCUT ell 'WEAR 2' FROM, ExCNATION EDriE a IDE ANO INSI E ar SIRVCMW '(] ® NtTx1 AFtu ?,�➢ rw Tri AA HAW BFLr NA " IM RA • W Cup AAI' "AAAI /e0 CAN 8GC ,SE R-2 AWTFORuAIAND PPE CONNECTION g (pTr suLE&INvOW1 rw lett - Ff 1Nfl R -]O ,To NAN Hoc l1LteAt lr�4 CWS r[ FDM Ce4M roz-sex .%5E L. APPRPm EW L o ° — f R.4.w eRC,ar G91ET C crS`t SHALL eI rFPm • cnM.NE,C HORS('J,pE A+a - ::• : S.• F.r+ „5. N• R. cnwicTroN PRE To wrelvlE3 cacxeTr wRru Au sees 'uor srRucruRE— TCH, L .I 67 POURED —RErE DVSE, FOR ALTEraurrTE PRE{YSt COTICAETE, • r � Hq NPO Ca1[CTAe ,NE rRlpw+c „EAR T,[ + A 91+¢i 9E nn bmw1�A. wAnA6Le ' I Y' RluS E AREA Te Pte rCEOIJInEO OW 11r - '• °RTrAT Ye TNC mmw[xc,Na 4nRrns aAsi caulhE ssaTnarrcss TACK COAs RuSUE Wpai sTANDARD PLAT[ W11 sladlvr DIAMETER AND y r NN s, N RXL GEPrN NK,R Or 9rWpVS BASE a Np r Ne}Tm EagwgN EOCE rwt N' � . • Lf 3 � nu xPrN x..cn °r arN.evs wx a sa.Rm Y +uNxw e,�'.nw Ence RR wETue COURSE GST NOrew SeelicN ;.-,�,• a - CCHi[ET 1a MN.a[I p _ _ COME DMNL�` 96' 64�E e°uRSE NAam aS AT 1r OC EACH MY wRI>i s(RER a PLLMERr� RSR-9u� PUHs FOR iE4'Trr AND p -- .••. I— (� MANHOLE SUPS SHHLL 6E CAST IRAN OR MA MODEL PS -I -Pr a � .,��.�� — � I J q�, 1 fey w NDuSTRUL HC.] CONFORMING TO ALL DSNA REGuLATONS Cp.CTErE eaLPA rnNCRLiE dTc�n S aF xwNa[L 7 te0x ST,V6IRP CUSi S I = - ReER aaC AND SPACED 16- OC- SECTION A -A ,HPE sa.!s ON rP` aram Earl r. Z. To wanm m Ewa A sNOnnF 3 I -- STANDARD MANHOLE FOR PRaCroR DENSITY STANDARD SM!'FARY SEWER [� WNIHIM 51EEL RONFORLfNENT a.:221 aAr�. Ha 54iE COMALENT STEEL AREA IN WIRE ,491 PLRSTEREO POUR A s TO W OwICRET[ COAUN SECTION t. aaE -0rAa f0 eE AOOA101 Rnru — — —J-11 Ex'TEAIOR OR 22Fe p siNO TO Tti cR(u5r 2cmlra `-95N STANQIRaPROGENERAL DIMEH.SIOnt F9R ConaREIE APPLE 614N gyCIH .___I I I- I I ,pn� illillilli TO BRICK AND CONCRETE AIASDI/E•r YNR - au CTCH O• -A4 WCP.TEO w alr.E-+9 5.riy er Trn[ Erna[ caval N T,c G1Cx MEw wiR�0.LS R[OUR[D w °KIN SPACES ;wu eE CVIRrRUCTPY OI p4C,1W1iNN1 AREA [1ROlH To INCONSTRUCTION ALSO. EXCEPT AS NOTED. G3W • yiy K WE— F -330E -At PKOTS! LdMAETE OraY w ALCORLv[E >tRt1 vVwl S[.AAWO MTC �OOk. 091A APPfN1RD YOPES 10 IXK ouri'ROA OR rrANmLl Fb+-Pr sow R aRICIC (Mn SPEC .Se1e) ROCK.NY.ro1R1RUL eIC] CCelr^^'.�_ m ALL 09r RE4uATIOf6lnA[O 1E' a [� f2- WaHIMVMEOR PRECAST, 3 aRICIG all IEA,OrRr CONSmLC1rON!A" Ra;N MHHHDIS AD°ATEa N OA ftn SWL ECAR`I IDROP d OPfiiER TNN 2i F,C•iv. u9E OYTSaE DROP, MRIIMVLI FOR NA.SanRr CONSTVCTICRI rrEH7ASPER M,,DOT SPED 9301. GRADE a0. rMn Atr' RpRA1 OFEIxOI I— Title: Title: TRIx Standard Manhole for TIDe Standard Tri Catch Basin Utility Excavation in Streets Standard Sanitary Outside Drop Section For Riprap Detail � `•� Standard Plate Library Standard Plate Library Standard Plate Library Standard Plate Library Standard Plate Library Standard Plate Library Standard Plate Library Manhole Sanitary Manhole Storm Sewer Catch Basin Manhole that are Less than 5 Years Old Citv of Monticello pole; Plate No. City of Monticello ; pate N°• City of Monticello cote: 03—D5 P,Ote Na• City of Monticello a3_DS Plate "° Citi' of Monticello �= p3-45 PI°t° "°• City of Monticello � 03-D5 �'°'° "° Citi° of Monticello oDte: fl3 �8 pl°ie H,. D3-05 D3-04 _ — — — - - - — = RaYhvd: 4001 sReMfesde 40Q9 -- RaNlsed: 4002 _ - 4003 R"lmd: 7007 aedtD3-15 3'0Q1 == __ R -""d:03-15 3002 43-17 03-15 63-17 03-17 03-17 J J J PaaNr ANT© sTARc SiRAx 1. YOOO 's " J 6' TO „ c DA N0.L EACLOSED MD RAST [C OR PDLrESTEN fW'rT]NG TYPE 2� SIOROLL DITCH CHECK. ueE d Rn1b. DRAOED AREAe 2' x tr LO[C Ua[Yix SfH AT 1 ip 9ryCUB Ayv,yy. STARS SHALL eE PHax Tlgo cM ENE .5 ovi Of Min, AiORO,p AT T wWAL Or 93 noels men Tet 10P a Tet SrAxf vaenno rsS1aEAHL EIDNp.L `RNmE e- Tv v' yr FAIPEOMENT vEm,rL .s' FLS ' [e• EH�wENi ¢PTA PIOROLL STAKING DETAIL ENTRENCH A MINI" OF 2• NOTE - WHEN MORE TNeN 1 BIGROLL ALOHFOST Ldp Is NEEDED, DVERP.AP ENDS A HINIKM OF 6• AND STAKE Title: Bio La Staking � g g Standard Plate Library Straw or Wood Bio Roll City of Monticello Data: Plate No, — D3-08 Raves 03-15 6009 r�r�r� r r� r�r� GRASS TURF J SEEDING AS � APPROPRIATE FOR BASIN Where the flow of water is sheeting, place sod strips perpendicular to the direction of water flow. SHINGLING SOD QF s s -s 1<MDTH VARIES s -s s 3:1 MAX 3:1 MAX SIDE SLOPE SIDE SLOPE UNDISTURBED AND/OR UNCOMPACTED INSITU SOIL � r y Title: Erosion Control Blanket Standard Plate Library' Stapling Patterns & Installation City of Monticello note: Plata No. _ 03—D8 ReYiaad:03-15 6011 _j ELV =VARIES BOTTOM BASIN ELV = 956.00 6) IN THE EVENT THAT SEDIMENT IS INTRODUCED INTO THE BMP DURING OR IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING EXCAVATION, THIS MATERIAL WILL NEED TO BE REMOVED FROM THE INFILTRATION BASIN PRIOR TO INITIATING THE NEXT STEP IN THE INFILTRATION BASIN CONSTRUCTION PROCESS. THIS IS ESPECIALLY IMPORTANT IF THE INFILTRATION BASIN HAS BEEN DESIGNED TO INFILTRATE STORM WATER: SEDIMENT THAT HAS BEEN WASHED INTO THE INFILTRATION BASIN DURING THE EXCAVATION PROCESS CAN SEAL THE PERMEABLE MATERIAL, SIGNIFICANTLY REDUCING THE INFILTRATION CAPACITY OF THE SOILS. 7) INFILTRATION BASINS SHALL BE OVER—EXCAVATED TO SPECIFIED DEPTH AND FILLED WITH A WELL BLENDED MIXTURE OF 70%-80% SEMI—COURSE WASHED SAND; 20%-30% J � ITEM 7. TYPICAL INFILTRATION BASIN CROSS-SECTION NOT TO SCALE INFILTRATION BASIN GENERAL NOTES: 1) INSTALL ALL TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES (IN ACCORDANCE WITH MnDOT GENERAL CONDITIONS 2573) PRIOR TO THE START OF ANY CONSTRUCTION OPERATION THAT MAY CAUSE ANY SEDIMENTATION OR SILTATION AT THE SITE. 2) INSTALL STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION TO PREVENT CLOGGING OF THE STORM SEWER AND SEDIMENT LOADS TO DOWNSTREAM STORM WATER FACILITIES OR WATERBODIES. 3) IF THE STORM WATER BMP IS BEING DESIGNED TO SERVE AS A TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN, GRADE THE BMP TO WITHIN 12" ABOVE THE FINAL GRADE TO PROTECT THE UNDERLYING MATERIAL FROM CLOGGING. ONCE CONSTRUCTION IN THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND THE SITE IS STABILIZED, EXCAVATE THE INFILTRATION BASIN TO FINAL GRADE AND COMPLETE CONSTRUCTION OF THE INFILTRATION BASIN. 4) GRADING OF THE INFILTRATION BASIN SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED USING LOW—IMPACT EARTH MOVING EQUIPMENT TO PREVENT COMPACTION OF THE UNDERLYING SOILS. SMALL TRACKED DOZERS AND BOBCATS WITH RUNNER TRACKS ARE RECOMMENDED. 5) EXCAVATE THE INFILTRATION BASIN TO THE SPECIFIED DEPTH (ELEVATION). ALL SUB MATERIAL BELOW THE SPECIFIED ELEVATION To 01 1 SHALL BE LEFT UNDISTURBED, UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. MnDOT GRADE 2 COMPOST. ALTERNATE OPTION IS TO IMPORT 3 INCH DEPTH MnDOT GRADE 2 COMPOST AND ROTO—TILL INTO TOP 9 INCH DEPTH NATIVE SOIL PROVIDED NATIVE SOIL IS CONFIRMED TO BE CLEAN SAND MEETING MnDOT SELECT GRANULAR SPECIFICATION AND ALL NON—NATIVE SOILS ARE REMOVED. 8) INFILTRATION BASIN TO BE SEEDED WITH MNDOT SEED MIX 34-181 OR APPROVED EQUAL. SEEDING SHALL CONFORM TO MnDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION, PLANTING SPECIFICATION 3876, 2005 EDITION. 9) PORTIONS OF INFILTRATION BASINS TO BE SEEDED SHALL BE MULCHED WITH CLEAN GRAIN STRAW (MnDOT TYPE 3) ATA RATE OF 2 TONS PER ACRE. 10) SEEDING AND INSTALLATION OF ANY EROSION CONTROL BLANKET NECESSARY SHALL BE COMPLETED WITHIN SEVEN DAYS (7) DAYS OF FINAL GRADING. I t a• MAk rR.RsrERsc ° euNr nTdnrx arAs 5�a - Hae e' Tv 1r APNOAa stH •Hoa 10- a AAacFn rPaaFc. I�' L A1NabR 9oP - a ev,n ew5 ,. Au TRAvr cuAtuts s+AiL ar rvA.wM2rA rnrn rNvncArlorr PER NnOOr BPEG 3391 a ]]94 I. AxNlEv ro nANW EW smlas u• vR uArm I, Au Nurs AND avLr ATrwwo rRASN cuARo TA Tit Fu#O aA SECTNxI StW.L BE Where the flow of water is a' concentrated, place sod slips STABILIZED TraRADE parallel to the direction of OVERLAPPING SOD water flow. NOTE: S Although pegging of sod is not specifically required it is understood that the will contractor will be responsible for the successful establishment of the sod including repair or of sod which becomes displaced or damaged due to lack Of protectian or proper core- wTT3, VdVEN OR TRN MIX No. 3Y22A FOR Tills: Standard Plate Library Sod Placement City aF Monticello •"' RTI" Date Plan No. SSa.E_410EB4e2 D3-07 � Remold: 6010 03-15 s s -s 1<MDTH VARIES s -s s 3:1 MAX 3:1 MAX SIDE SLOPE SIDE SLOPE UNDISTURBED AND/OR UNCOMPACTED INSITU SOIL � r y Title: Erosion Control Blanket Standard Plate Library' Stapling Patterns & Installation City of Monticello note: Plata No. _ 03—D8 ReYiaad:03-15 6011 _j ELV =VARIES BOTTOM BASIN ELV = 956.00 6) IN THE EVENT THAT SEDIMENT IS INTRODUCED INTO THE BMP DURING OR IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING EXCAVATION, THIS MATERIAL WILL NEED TO BE REMOVED FROM THE INFILTRATION BASIN PRIOR TO INITIATING THE NEXT STEP IN THE INFILTRATION BASIN CONSTRUCTION PROCESS. THIS IS ESPECIALLY IMPORTANT IF THE INFILTRATION BASIN HAS BEEN DESIGNED TO INFILTRATE STORM WATER: SEDIMENT THAT HAS BEEN WASHED INTO THE INFILTRATION BASIN DURING THE EXCAVATION PROCESS CAN SEAL THE PERMEABLE MATERIAL, SIGNIFICANTLY REDUCING THE INFILTRATION CAPACITY OF THE SOILS. 7) INFILTRATION BASINS SHALL BE OVER—EXCAVATED TO SPECIFIED DEPTH AND FILLED WITH A WELL BLENDED MIXTURE OF 70%-80% SEMI—COURSE WASHED SAND; 20%-30% J � ITEM 7. TYPICAL INFILTRATION BASIN CROSS-SECTION NOT TO SCALE INFILTRATION BASIN GENERAL NOTES: 1) INSTALL ALL TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES (IN ACCORDANCE WITH MnDOT GENERAL CONDITIONS 2573) PRIOR TO THE START OF ANY CONSTRUCTION OPERATION THAT MAY CAUSE ANY SEDIMENTATION OR SILTATION AT THE SITE. 2) INSTALL STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION TO PREVENT CLOGGING OF THE STORM SEWER AND SEDIMENT LOADS TO DOWNSTREAM STORM WATER FACILITIES OR WATERBODIES. 3) IF THE STORM WATER BMP IS BEING DESIGNED TO SERVE AS A TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN, GRADE THE BMP TO WITHIN 12" ABOVE THE FINAL GRADE TO PROTECT THE UNDERLYING MATERIAL FROM CLOGGING. ONCE CONSTRUCTION IN THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND THE SITE IS STABILIZED, EXCAVATE THE INFILTRATION BASIN TO FINAL GRADE AND COMPLETE CONSTRUCTION OF THE INFILTRATION BASIN. 4) GRADING OF THE INFILTRATION BASIN SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED USING LOW—IMPACT EARTH MOVING EQUIPMENT TO PREVENT COMPACTION OF THE UNDERLYING SOILS. SMALL TRACKED DOZERS AND BOBCATS WITH RUNNER TRACKS ARE RECOMMENDED. 5) EXCAVATE THE INFILTRATION BASIN TO THE SPECIFIED DEPTH (ELEVATION). ALL SUB MATERIAL BELOW THE SPECIFIED ELEVATION To 01 1 SHALL BE LEFT UNDISTURBED, UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. MnDOT GRADE 2 COMPOST. ALTERNATE OPTION IS TO IMPORT 3 INCH DEPTH MnDOT GRADE 2 COMPOST AND ROTO—TILL INTO TOP 9 INCH DEPTH NATIVE SOIL PROVIDED NATIVE SOIL IS CONFIRMED TO BE CLEAN SAND MEETING MnDOT SELECT GRANULAR SPECIFICATION AND ALL NON—NATIVE SOILS ARE REMOVED. 8) INFILTRATION BASIN TO BE SEEDED WITH MNDOT SEED MIX 34-181 OR APPROVED EQUAL. SEEDING SHALL CONFORM TO MnDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION, PLANTING SPECIFICATION 3876, 2005 EDITION. 9) PORTIONS OF INFILTRATION BASINS TO BE SEEDED SHALL BE MULCHED WITH CLEAN GRAIN STRAW (MnDOT TYPE 3) ATA RATE OF 2 TONS PER ACRE. 10) SEEDING AND INSTALLATION OF ANY EROSION CONTROL BLANKET NECESSARY SHALL BE COMPLETED WITHIN SEVEN DAYS (7) DAYS OF FINAL GRADING. I t a• MAk rR.RsrERsc ° euNr nTdnrx arAs 5�a - Hae e' Tv 1r APNOAa stH •Hoa 10- a AAacFn rPaaFc. I�' L A1NabR 9oP - a ev,n ew5 ,. Au TRAvr cuAtuts s+AiL ar rvA.wM2rA rnrn rNvncArlorr PER NnOOr BPEG 3391 a ]]94 I. AxNlEv ro nANW EW smlas u• vR uArm I, Au Nurs AND avLr ATrwwo rRASN cuARo TA Tit Fu#O aA SECTNxI StW.L BE \1 Ensnnc culls OVERFLOW 15 $ OF WE culla Bak HEIGHT PLAN x•IMCO RDAs aRARi Gti-Z3• HIGH FLOW l!Ex ppai[CiION CURS AND GLITTER EraaEL DEFLECTOR PLAiE c:r AQPRO,Ea EQUAL OkERFLOW IS h or THE CURB BDa NErf�Fi oAERrLow a, f— FiTER AssEMeLr F,LTER ASeEMIBLr alANE1EA, B, ON -GRADE 10 ' AT Low PANT r.pt-"Lox rAeRlc •FDR THE HEW R -3290 -Ya STANDARD G1S101C, INSTALL WIMP ROAD MWN cc -32e0 OR CITY APPRaved EnuAL. Title: Standard Plate Library Inlet Protection Catch Basin Insert City of Monticello Data: -Prat, No. Y' 03—D7 _ -- Rewsed:03-15 5Dl]4 nardPlateLibrary Trash [ward far End Section of Monticello Nat°:D3-o5P,°t.H0. ReNleed:D3-15 4�1 Match-------- vaj� Or ar Rghk of way Existing Geode PLAN TRI.: Commercial Gravel Standard Plate Library Construction Entrance City of Monticello pole; 06-14 Plata Ha Rai1aed:03-15 600 GroNN pod[s] MnDOT Cross CA -15 Or CA_25 Riprop Bedding Geolexlae Kobelt Orlgind geode SEC ri�B=R (not In sctAe) fthed a Corrugated steel plates Original GeatextBe fohric 5£CTILUI A -A geode [not to scaee] NOTES= ChonneliEe runoff to sediment Sediment Trapping Device trapping de+nee e RIbhM a Cnrvgoled steel plates I � AI� A � E vl o o 24' min. xSlope axoy from A++ � _ highway 50' min. _Y 2 tr f a' e STABILIZED TraRADE polo: Plata Na 03-05 nAkE:n ue srACIF1a 2004 � S �II�IIIII�IIIIIII� F' HFIIWIc NOTES: EkiSTING P6vEa MSTRnCTIDn wTT3, VdVEN OR TRN MIX No. 3Y22A FOR ROADWAY � MANUAL PLACEMENT HAL .v.rrs wTNa ,v a . eoa slvu R NIa,RMrD u»rc Tec PmS. •"' RTI" � Epy pyE LABe oyEkLIYECLA 18' X]H— 11 ....... SSa.E_410EB4e2 ERN END dNERLAP YITN SP[KEs [R STAIC}:S ` �........... I F...... STRAP CaHNECrdlS 1011111: awsrRucnwT PULE END wEretw INTERLEIOK caro sraAP cERN1Ear[1Rs END dvERLAP Ensnnc culls OVERFLOW 15 $ OF WE culla Bak HEIGHT PLAN x•IMCO RDAs aRARi Gti-Z3• HIGH FLOW l!Ex ppai[CiION CURS AND GLITTER EraaEL DEFLECTOR PLAiE c:r AQPRO,Ea EQUAL OkERFLOW IS h or THE CURB BDa NErf�Fi oAERrLow a, f— FiTER AssEMeLr F,LTER ASeEMIBLr alANE1EA, B, ON -GRADE 10 ' AT Low PANT r.pt-"Lox rAeRlc •FDR THE HEW R -3290 -Ya STANDARD G1S101C, INSTALL WIMP ROAD MWN cc -32e0 OR CITY APPRaved EnuAL. Title: Standard Plate Library Inlet Protection Catch Basin Insert City of Monticello Data: -Prat, No. Y' 03—D7 _ -- Rewsed:03-15 5Dl]4 nardPlateLibrary Trash [ward far End Section of Monticello Nat°:D3-o5P,°t.H0. ReNleed:D3-15 4�1 Match-------- vaj� Or ar Rghk of way Existing Geode PLAN TRI.: Commercial Gravel Standard Plate Library Construction Entrance City of Monticello pole; 06-14 Plata Ha Rai1aed:03-15 600 GroNN pod[s] MnDOT Cross CA -15 Or CA_25 Riprop Bedding Geolexlae Kobelt Orlgind geode SEC ri�B=R (not In sctAe) fthed a Corrugated steel plates Original GeatextBe fohric 5£CTILUI A -A geode [not to scaee] NOTES= ChonneliEe runoff to sediment Sediment Trapping Device trapping de+nee e RIbhM a Cnrvgoled steel plates I � AI� A � E vl o o 24' min. xSlope axoy from A++ � _ highway 50' min. _Y 2 tr PAD AREA ERNE SIZE) IRStindard Plate Library City of Monticello s}aE t � /dYCRLAP Mud Mat Entrance 06-14 plat 77 ` 60fl3 a6-14 IH msrr NmA er,oe - .nr.ot use TNAK s' 6urLNelxa ATeEA, adrsrRUErIDN sfrE, a' e STABILIZED TraRADE polo: Plata Na 03-05 nAkE:n ue srACIF1a 2004 � S �II�IIIII�IIIIIII� F' HFIIWIc NOTES: EkiSTING P6vEa MSTRnCTIDn wTT3, VdVEN OR TRN MIX No. 3Y22A FOR ROADWAY � MANUAL PLACEMENT HAL .v.rrs wTNa ,v a . eoa slvu R NIa,RMrD u»rc Tec PmS. •"' RTI" � Epy pyE LABe oyEkLIYECLA 18' X]H— 11 ....... SSa.E_410EB4e2 ERN END dNERLAP YITN SP[KEs [R STAIC}:S ` �........... I F...... STRAP CaHNECrdlS awsrRucnwT PULE END wEretw INTERLEIOK caro sraAP cERN1Ear[1Rs END dvERLAP PAD AREA ERNE SIZE) IRStindard Plate Library City of Monticello s}aE t � /dYCRLAP Mud Mat Entrance 06-14 plat 77 ` 60fl3 a6-14 IH msrr NmA er,oe - .nr.ot use TNAK s' w rs+ux e•. a- . a- moa LEvi Two 6 a' e sTrNvraar la -Te atuo FrASrL FOW OR AFPRO.FA EpYL AneeA sFir_is .' AerAaln SE ANO Y •G C- IIRUA,pN REWREII FOR N4TF14MM wAM Kms," S' COULR N � AKAS AND IF � IN4'!ER �YEO ^.WTAttS. [, Title: Insulation Standard Plate Library Detail City of Monticello polo: Plata Na 03-05 Re,rleed:D3_ 15 2004 � Title: `� Standard Plate Literary R atermain Unset City of Monticelln Dot,: ❑3-0plot'p,aN,• Revised:03— ] 7 2445 V all a• N ercx WaAa M N CarCllrTl� OR Prism A� HrDANNOR C ",ERRa a-+ JT,WC 140 T11Laf OUT G OAttR TAO y ro R iO U. `�A�FR RyA.a. Cp[N 9 +ETw b�C+•nu. eaRe OR�CVTRR WE I D z�wwNw_ I ' r r en ribur, ` xA s�tw 1 urasoF - As [n ' oPAETFA eK Y aFP Prt RbEN rR➢AtlR �° xRN t!A '5M11 ruK BoMOPIMPT x HOMxAI Or. 1 C.r. 0 6E , NTIH ANOTECTA2 DO11N10 Af I-,�E• �Na CLFM 51 1. �� �AOtPrce A� I NLnN b a r r c aE r1E TIFIvar FTFE Ct Cn 0 T1tle: Standard Plate Literary Typical Hydrant Installation City of Monticello oDt,: 03-05 Rate Na. Ravised:03-17 2t)D1 00 L% � o� v� 1811 � —WHITE ON BLUE T PARKING BY DISABLED PERMIT ONLY TOW A BLACK ON WHITE r NU ZONE FINE UP TO $250.00 W/ 1.5" LETTERS LM V HANDICAP SIGN ccc a W _ THIS SIGN TYP @? EACH O HANDICAP PARKING SPACE '*--3" L FINISH GRADE L1 1-011 MANN LU IBBBBBB co M ca LU I I ° CONCRETE.: o � WCL �- `Rvro;cn sTaIN sENT;x e'x Y WauVRxH rwxm -III III S �II�IIIII�IIIIIII� F' HFIIWIc NOTES: 1. CONCRETE MIX SHALL t MIX No. 3Y22A FOR SLIPFORM P � MANUAL PLACEMENT HAL .v.rrs wTNa ,v a . eoa slvu R NIa,RMrD u»rc Tec PmS. Title: `� Standard Plate Literary R atermain Unset City of Monticelln Dot,: ❑3-0plot'p,aN,• Revised:03— ] 7 2445 V all a• N ercx WaAa M N CarCllrTl� OR Prism A� HrDANNOR C ",ERRa a-+ JT,WC 140 T11Laf OUT G OAttR TAO y ro R iO U. `�A�FR RyA.a. Cp[N 9 +ETw b�C+•nu. eaRe OR�CVTRR WE I D z�wwNw_ I ' r r en ribur, ` xA s�tw 1 urasoF - As [n ' oPAETFA eK Y aFP Prt RbEN rR➢AtlR �° xRN t!A '5M11 ruK BoMOPIMPT x HOMxAI Or. 1 C.r. 0 6E , NTIH ANOTECTA2 DO11N10 Af I-,�E• �Na CLFM 51 1. �� �AOtPrce A� I NLnN b a r r c aE r1E TIFIvar FTFE Ct Cn 0 T1tle: Standard Plate Literary Typical Hydrant Installation City of Monticello oDt,: 03-05 Rate Na. Ravised:03-17 2t)D1 00 L% � o� v� 1811 � —WHITE ON BLUE T PARKING BY DISABLED PERMIT ONLY TOW A BLACK ON WHITE r NU ZONE FINE UP TO $250.00 W/ 1.5" LETTERS LM V HANDICAP SIGN ccc a W _ THIS SIGN TYP @? EACH O HANDICAP PARKING SPACE '*--3" L FINISH GRADE L1 1-011 MANN LU IBBBBBB co M ca LU I I ° CONCRETE.: o � WCL W MOM I •, I I , O I I°00 mumTBIBB HANDICAP SIGN 2" BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE SPWEB240B MnDOT SPEC 2360 � 2" BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE � u SPNWB230B MnDOT SPEC 2360 6" CLASS V AGGREGATE BASE MnDOT SPEC 3138 -I � I -I � I -I � I -III III-IIIIII' =-I � I—I IM IM II—III—III SUBGRADE PREPARATION TOP -I � MI I - III — CO CNoun to III=III 6" TO PASS PROOF ROLL BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT NOTE: SOILS SPECIFICATIONS SUPERSEDE ABOVE LISTED SPECIFICATIONS " CONCRETE PAVEMENT 6" CONCRETE PAVEMENT MNDOT SPEC 2461 4" SELECT GRANULAR BORROW MNDOT SPEC 3149.2B WITH REINFORCEMENT; I' SEE DETAIL 6" SELECT GRANULAR BORROW MNDOT SPEC 3149.2B I � I -III -III -I I I� III -III -I I I UBGRADE PREPARATION TOP —III—III—III—III—III SUBGRADE PREPARATION TOP " TO PASS PROOF ROLL II=III=III=I 6" TO PASS PROOF ROLL NOTES: MNDOT SPEC. 2461 1. CONCRETE MIX SHALL CONFORM TO MNDOT SPEC. 2461 PLACEMENT MIX No. 3Y22A FOR SLIPFORM PLACEMENT MIX No. 3Y32A FOR MANUAL PLACEMENT TO MNDOT SPEC. 2301 2. CONCRETE PLACEMENT SHALL CONFORM TO MNDOT SPEC. 2301 TRACTION JOINTS AT 6'-0" O.C. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL SPACE THE CONTRACTION JOINTS AT 12'-0" O.C. ABOVE LISTED SPECIFICATIONS 4. SOILS SPECIFICATIONS SUPERSEDE ABOVE LISTED SPECIFICATIONS -SIDEWALK CONCRETE PAVEMENT - HEAVY DUTY - 4 -III III S �II�IIIII�IIIIIII� 6 NOTES: 1. CONCRETE MIX SHALL CONFORM TO MIX No. 3Y22A FOR SLIPFORM P MIX No. 3Y32A FOR MANUAL PLACEMENT 2. CONCRETE PLACEMENT SHALL CONFORM � 4. SOILS SPECIFICATIONS Ln \ 3" GALVANIZED STEEL POLE � CO CNoun to III=III 6" TO PASS PROOF ROLL BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT NOTE: SOILS SPECIFICATIONS SUPERSEDE ABOVE LISTED SPECIFICATIONS " CONCRETE PAVEMENT 6" CONCRETE PAVEMENT MNDOT SPEC 2461 4" SELECT GRANULAR BORROW MNDOT SPEC 3149.2B WITH REINFORCEMENT; I' SEE DETAIL 6" SELECT GRANULAR BORROW MNDOT SPEC 3149.2B I � I -III -III -I I I� III -III -I I I UBGRADE PREPARATION TOP —III—III—III—III—III SUBGRADE PREPARATION TOP " TO PASS PROOF ROLL II=III=III=I 6" TO PASS PROOF ROLL NOTES: MNDOT SPEC. 2461 1. CONCRETE MIX SHALL CONFORM TO MNDOT SPEC. 2461 PLACEMENT MIX No. 3Y22A FOR SLIPFORM PLACEMENT MIX No. 3Y32A FOR MANUAL PLACEMENT TO MNDOT SPEC. 2301 2. CONCRETE PLACEMENT SHALL CONFORM TO MNDOT SPEC. 2301 TRACTION JOINTS AT 6'-0" O.C. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL SPACE THE CONTRACTION JOINTS AT 12'-0" O.C. ABOVE LISTED SPECIFICATIONS 4. SOILS SPECIFICATIONS SUPERSEDE ABOVE LISTED SPECIFICATIONS -SIDEWALK CONCRETE PAVEMENT - HEAVY DUTY - 4 -III III S �II�IIIII�IIIIIII� 6 NOTES: 1. CONCRETE MIX SHALL CONFORM TO MIX No. 3Y22A FOR SLIPFORM P MIX No. 3Y32A FOR MANUAL PLACEMENT 2. CONCRETE PLACEMENT SHALL CONFORM 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL SPACE THE CON 4. SOILS SPECIFICATIONS SUPERSEDE A CONCRETE PAVEMENT INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: CO PROJECT LOCATION PLAN C1 SITE PLAN C2 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN C3 SANITARY AND WATER UTILITY PLAN C4 STORM SEWER UTILITY PLAN C5 LANDSCAPE PLAN C6 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C7 EXISTING CONDITIONS AND REMOVALS PLAN C8 DETAILS C9 PHASING PLAN O � m m O m Q � v 0 o a v FILE NO. 2 O 00633 • 1' DEPTH AMMENDED SOIL MEDIUM; SEE GENERAL NOTES Details I I � 1 I I I DUN DAS ROAD x� ' 1 - ----_�\ - - 10" D.I.P. 1 O I ' 15 R.C.P. 00 � �, N MH 000 S"T I �' I �1� I 960 RIM ELEV.=960.04 SAN MH 1 ; • I g6�� 6�� �� 960.Oo - - °s 959.90 INV. ELFDV,.=942.8 RIM ELEV.=961.96 �h I I 960.66 `� �6 )-�' - - 6°�= 960°s )�� - o ' 959.79 INV. ELEV.=943.7 , °��° 1�,0 y 9s� �� 961_11 i )< - - - - - - - -)` 960 s ° q - - - '� 61�'°6- - - �'s r 900 960 - -I - - _ _ /`8so �59»_-n- _ _ _x 958.6 I - -9 �1 g - 959.2X < X I - - - 95n X 9._59.3 960.6 X_ o� ���' T° ( 959.7. - T T T T T T - T T y 960 ; - - _--T- q6�- -tea' -- 800 RISER- - - I * I6^j - sem° ----- - 960 - - - - -_- ?j 1., - X961960 ;--- ----- - - - 962.1 962 1 _�- yb 1- - - --=_j------__ -_-- _ ---<------ -- - »- » - X 961.5 _ �, _ _ 962 - --- -- ---- - - - ° ) ssg-- kSr��� - - -6' ---�� �� 01.5 96,�II -a Ery. 9 E,� 4 - I I� I I 0 C, / 962 EA,0�t(`� 2,� !� q6� X 9E'2.9 _ _- - - X a63. _ oti I 0 �1 963.0 i 962 I '' - I _ - 962.SX Q �' 2o��MI 1 9631 \\7 6,'62.; Lj_jI N 111 L�7�' ti - 06� ---- �-- ----- �'r`=� ' 963 -- --- -- -- -- -- mo' .0q -------- --T-' i"I x.963 -------------------- --------� 1 I. �_ 109 109 I II IIS. 9+. ).2 �6��I ACCESS DRIVE AND ACCESS DRIVE AND I61`h - _ _ _ - _ _ _ - - - I ! I 86215; \ ASSOCIATED UTILITIES TO 5 62'2 I BE INSTALLED AS PART OF ASSOCIATED UTILITIES TO o f� o ; o°- - ; ; BE INSTALLED AS PART OF W 862 I' / ab BUILDING B QO I ;; 61.9 PHASE 1 IMPROVEMENTS 8215 I� BUILDING �g62 6,976 SF I it I ISI PHASE 1 IMPROVEMENTS I I; 6, 9 7 F � I 963.1 X\ O I I ; ; I I ;' \\ I / X 964.2 \ I FFE=963.50 \ I I I o I' / \ W X '9 6� FFE=963. II � I \ I 1 _ \_x i I ' 16 I X 61; \ 6�j� \1 i 96,,. \ X961.9962.0 uuo0 oOoOo'O�o�O�oI I I rn \ v u u o 0 0 0 0 0 0 'o"o o�0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N I I AA/I lit U u u-O"O-O- O" O8O"'Ogou0Uou000000000ep0 Oo o'o`o O O o-00.O,.O_O_4-O-o n _ 9''/• ' IVI IIIVVV - v -o -o -o -os o"o0 0 0 0„0♦?0„0_0_0_0_� n n � O O O O y 0 0 0 0 0 Oho n • 6'� I II O --LI E''= 9sA \ j I ° I .A° o' \\ o I I X 0 qro I I GoIf \ I 963.7X96 .5x / 1 / I 96�, -.-� I g6 I .7 1 ' 9-� '�'-' '-'-' ° I I 963 ti o .y. •>o 62 6 -96 q I •• q I I \\\ \\ \\ ) b5 964.3 I I iiiniiiiii -.4 I �����--+--� , \ I � I �P Ij� I I I co I ° I X _ 6 i u u u o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0�0 0 0 0 0„0_0_ X 9c�. ��O o O O O o O o O o 000 ,oOgoo0oo0000�0�0�0 0 0 0 090 0 o O o 0 0 ' obti I I \ u U U"O-O-O"O�O O Ou0U0 O„ ,�O O O„O,-O,.O-O.O n r OOOo0o0nonon0„O..O,.O..O.• .0.0 n !+ nK 960.94 I IX g IX96� MOW --, 9s?so' \ II I I I I 6�� LINE 11 - \-____ MOWI I I 1 II I 1.7 //X961.0 � Ix',1 \ILINE I • II �I �i i- If ' N neo n • BUILDING C BUILDING D I II I I o II � `° I�,bti�'� X961 i X 960.6 1 1 w X g X 963.9 6 9 76 SF 964.5 X I 1 1�6�, II ► 6,976 SF I II 1962 �� Il n X 960. �I 6_�6 I I I 1 i °• , I 11 ; I 1 g 1 1 I WO F =NCE FFE=963.50 FFE=963.50 964\ C96O iI1�^ \ F _---------- n - i;I1{;I1 II 109 Cn/ ' 1 ON :�T LINE 109 Og,x 9 , 111 I I CaNOi i1 1 II 1 6 5 . 963 --------------- 916 'o X9 .61 X 963_ -------------- - 9 ---- --------==\F I 1 X 963.8 I 16° 23 I 1 LO I o I tib° �\\tib° 96, l' I II }19 q6 �q6 I 62 �; } 10 - I iI i �' 1 I I I I I o s?ao } 9 ti° �o \ ?�0 9s, I� Xc X� 5�.5 1 g6�j 0 6, �� 62.3I °'`°g6ti�q6� g6ti 962 I 20 }' \ o 959.4 �\ X 963.8 I \ I ' II 962 ` o o °tip° sF_� �� �`����-_'' so'- 1! oo ,CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER +�- I� °° I `� I 5.1 FT. EAST OF LOT LINE • I 220 _ f °� -�- �_� -�� I I i / 0 i i \ I g6ti 59.0 1 \ g 963.4 �I . � r I\\ \ \ \ X X 962.7 } I 962ii I16��---------- ------------ --- - 96 ----------------... ---- - -- 963 �` I II do / I / e --- ----�` II !----------- I rl T I 1 a � , I I II 1' O \ \ 1 109 X 961.3 I I I I 1 \\ \\ \X 962.4 11 109 �� Q•�'> I I \ CHAINLINK ---�^ 9'42• �III X 961.8 61.2 X j / I I I \ FENCE + ON LOT LINE. I" �10 II / \ / 1:96ti ,o 0 1 1\ \\ oX 960.5 q6 IIS q6� BUILDING F I ;I I q62 g62� BUILDING E 976 SF `° I II I' I \ Q- 6,976 SF x 958.6 ' � 1 1 FFE=963.50 I x960.4 1 I FFE=963 I II )61. X 961.5 X 9 s Z/ 62.5014 u v u o 0 0 0 0 0 0' 'o"'o ,: o ��y�u�y�0�0 O� O�O�O�O"C} X 962.6 I �` v v u 0 O O O O`O "'O OUO-00000 000 0000000 0 0 0 �� V�n 0 00 01 I I I v u u-O-O-O-O-O"O;O"'O�'O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O_O_O-o n =�,8 cy ( . I 1 • _ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 \.9 1 I • I I M I X, 8 i °' X 958.7 MEN i MINES 9s ° ti 6 / o o ACCESS DRIVE AND 1 , 6 q `I 9O q6� �,9 do I I 11 ASSOCIATED UTILITIES TO ACCESS DRIVE AND I - - BE INSTALLED AS PART OF ASSOCIATED UTILITIES TO a9s'>o g6� ��� g6� I II'I I PHASE 1 IMPROVEMENTS BE INSTALLED AS PART OF / I_ 961.4 X 961.3 0 : I', 961 .4 PHASE 1 IMPROVEMENTS \ I1 %o - X I 06��-- 1.91 ` I o' r- --�E-9 J o o= o ,o 1 6 v u o o -o -O o O In o 0 0 0�0 0 0 0 0 0- , q v 1 0, o O"O O o O O O O O 0 0 0 0 -01=o -O n O �6�• I -t- - -- U O-O"O-O-O�O"O�O�OuO O_ 0 0 0 O O / �O"O"O�Ou0'O„O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 �O "OD O�O900000,�0„O 0 0 0 0 0 0-O.n n ss?s0 X 959.9 X_961.0 I ,I I X 961.3 (; I ;/� ii I \ �1 I;0, I X li 4D �'- I BUILDING G ���\ BUILDING H �6 = ry,�;+ 0 I 1 962.7 fi 962�o i B \I 6,976 SF x as . q6 0 I, 6, 9 76 SF / 11 I \ 111 I I I CHAINLINK --� A1962.3 s II 1 I FENCE +�- 1I \\ FFE=963.50 : ;I / FFE=963. I ''I / X960.7 A 0 30 60 90 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET SURVEY DATA SURVEY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY: MEYER ROHLIN LAND SERVICES 708 1st AVENUE NE BUFFALO, MN 55313 DATED: APRIL 18, 2017 BENCHMARK: MN/DOT GEODETIC MONUMENT "8605 S" ELEVATION = 966.55 NAVD88 DATUM PROJECT LOCATION PART OF THE SW41 AND NEj, SECTION 14 TOWNSHIP 121, RANGE 25, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA. EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 2, BLOCK 3, OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA. PROJECT PHASING TIMELINE PHASE 1 2017-2018 PHASE 2 2018-2019 PHASE 3 2020-2021 PHASE 4 2022-2023 MARKET CONDITIONS MAY RESULT IN MODIFICATION OF PHASING TIMELINE AND PHASING OF SITE IMPROVEMENTS 0.5 FT. WEST II I \ IIt I \ 109 I OF LOT LINE. II 1 109 � ° � 162..30,--- --- f � o 9fi3 1 ` 00) , ', 1.46-- ---------' ----- -- ' 6, �-- --------- 0Ei� 01 2 I ' i /I_901.1 X 960.6 961.80 „0 6ti \ 96� I I �9 ° C 951.7 96y� °tip ?2 I I I 9s o o c 9 X\`. 5 \ o X 962.4 1 �- 962 -� /_9 'ss '�co`� j 6 1 _ ra ' 1 ------------- L° 962.6xq----------- 0) o 962.9X 962 9 J F 960.959 So 0 LANDSCAPE �I 1 960.959 x 152.0 958 \ +9 I \ \11 �( /// 958 ! 957- s� \ s0---EDGING/MULCH \) /l I I c�/ 856 957 �� , 3�1 j \ 956 s so I l I S°g6\ -_ CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER + - /� so 962.2 \ _ 9s1 \ �/ X- 96 X961.8 \ sol / 5.8 FT. EAST OF LOT LINE 967.2 X «' ; / \ - J 956 '�0 9 0 : - SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER + �- lit\ 958956 957 f `_ \ ` X Q6� �.958r 957 ''so I� \ I 1/4 OF SECTION 14, T. 121, R. 25 0.4 FT. WEST OF LOT CORNER I �T'r T'�. 959 _ 960 959 ' ` ��L� _ 1 N 89°14'00" E 11^ \ 960 ^ - x 9n3.4 GG1-------------- ---- ----- ------ N 89°14 00 - --- ' 001-_ -------- -_ ------ _ ------ _ ----r 3123 56 -- a - 962 _�--------- =Lys -psi iv �(yuci' E -1 - i - - ---- y 962 ,o ------ - 9642X -- 963 o°o° ------------------------ -------------------- x ���9j-=Lam'--LKS- X- © / �;--X961.3 _----963.7 i' o-cOo°o as> 6�3 - _ - - - \ / o o°o 3 MOW-, --o o °aQa°o°o°_�- R --- --- -------961- _�� .o o �� _,.6 Z' M- - \�TC 958.96 - �- - - - - - - �� -SHED \962- _-;,- 6 INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: - - LINE -e 1,--96 0-�\�� ,t 958.9 --- _-- �� I -i X961.6g61 60- X CIO SP `\�� CURB X. I - - `-_9 ANDSCAPE2 CO PROJECT LOCATION PLAN X \959 �`�� STOP 960.5 I --TEL. _X X �\ RISER EDGING/MULCH C1 SITE PLAN �lb LANDSCAPE-I'GOLDEN EAGLE ROADOF OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL C2 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN h�1 �CB _ � SOUTH LINE OF THE PLAT �h EDGING/ROCK ELEV.=958.16 r-------r- SHRUBS 1 '-------PARK (DOC.# 275353) AS MONUMENTED; ALSO C3 SANITARY AND WATER UTILITY PLAN &� SAN MH X I NORTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF KLEIN FARMS I I I C4 STORM SEWER UTILITY PLAN ELEV.-958.59--�,958.7 �� I ESTATES 2ND ADDITION (DOC.# 753470) I I I C5 LANDSCAPE PLAN C6 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C7 EXISTING CONDITIONS AND REMOVALS PLAN Ga I I I I I I I C8 DETAILS I I/ JI F__I n I I F__n F -)A ,h �` F �` _T_n I�� �` �h� n I I� A n� I _T_I /� N I I I I I C9 PHASING PLAN w � ct kr) W 0 kr) O M •� ct N On WO� ~ c, N w ( p L Q cj� Lo -+_j W p Zi CL Ld Ow= .v o CL CL 00 o0 u J co a o -;I- No) N co (o N lb � '2 >, Lo E a o "W W Lj ' °coin I o V U Oc) Lo §�� U �-6"oo tiw'�x I a� cE a2i mm L O O `� o, oma c ,� � Li o ma ai 3 o 4 j - C 00 o t o ° V I �� �a� , 1 cl J Q IZ c Z m 2 O 3 Q Q O Q: 4z o 2 O FILE NO. 00633 C9 Phasinq Plan 0 o ti 0 m Q o W a W v v FILE NO. 00633 C9 Phasinq Plan O 100 I_ SAN MH1I RIM ELEV.=961.96 Ch1 I I 1 INV. ELEV.=943.7 , °��°°• 9s� ` I / I ` 1 ___-961 960.6 Xr959.7. co r- - - 962.1- i A ' I DUNDAS ���� ROAD I I I X I 10" D.I.P. ! ! ! ! ! ! \ ! ! ! ! ! 1 \ I 15 " R.C.P. -�-�� 1 00 -5AN MH CL o �6 �6, Ov I /96 RIM ELEV.=960.04 �g6 ��� 960.00' _ � mss° 959.90 INV. ELEV =942.8 1 961_11 960.66) `fl 60 ) - - )�-06° - 960 so (; - �o° 959.79 g - 959.2xX00 960 - < _x\ j _ _ - _ _`8so ��9i- X 958.6 T T T - 960 T T _ T T t-� 960 _ _ XGA `X 959.3960 96160 9s�a-9S800RISER- - - ---- ��'. c -- - ---yb"1--961 --------- -- 77962 ------- - »-» ---- ,I 962 -_ ,-------= ----_- �-- r--=----_----_'-_ -- - - Y----- - - - - - - - - - - -�o - X 961.5 T Y Xi -�si-=-----so \' SII �I- -- � , 9f,�'• 4 'moo �� _ - __q, o tNQ1 "s / I' Q 4,Ci,s9 6 .(`� 2 ' 0 aEASF9,t_.'-_-, !N6ti�o I > X 963.0oXX a63.:i� o I9 962.Sx o,'62.; X o' W C C 9 ti , • � JIIII II I----- - --- -- _ - --------•---- _963 I Cil I .0 •'. I b I I • I a d Y I � I / I 1y 109 I rl III 109 ! _�_ I I .2 _ _ - - !; I �# ACCESS DRIVE AND ACCESS DRIVE AND :1 4113 II' I _ _ _ - - - - - - - / - i I g6215i# \ ASSOCIATED UTILITIES TO ASSOCIATED UTILITIES TO o f9 I p! 62.2 °-- BUILDING B t BE INSTALLED AS PART OF BE INSTALLED AS PART OF W I; i g6� I ' / 96� `o H 61.9 PHASE 1 IMPROVEMENTS I ; BUILDING �g62 1 I I II PHASE 1 IMPROVEMENTS 9 �2 ;5 l° 6,97 F 6,976 SF I I I II \ 963.1 X\ o I I Il�' I I I i1 / \\ / X 964.2 �o FFE=963.50 \ I I FFE=963. w II h° , \ � X 06'rn • I I _ _ �x i Nip � X 61- � � � \I .1 9625II,. I \ X 961.9 962.0 o�o�o I i� 6, II V v u-O-O'O (� O OOOOVO�OOOOOOOOOOOO�OOO u u-O"O-O- O"O�O"O�O'�O on000�0,0 •.O O_ o_o_c n �\/I� vOOn�O^DO�O�O�ODO�OnO'�:oo�no On00„O�On n . �- . - S� ° I (�• - -LIE'= sn \ i - I o I ' /I ct� I 10 Go 963.7X96 .5X' II 1 / I g6�.-.-.-.-.-.- -� I c)� .7 .-.-.- ° 0 96, X196118X963 I I , 96 r o ° eJry ,> ' i 1 .2 ,s I / 061 � --- --- --- 06� eb oC/� I_.� 961' �:_. _ _._._._._._._._ / • \A�� " 964.3 I ; I - III I-[. fi o I 1 I c9 co , o I, M x 6 �p' u n o 0 0 0 o"o"o,ko o„o`o 0_o806 0 8080'o 0' / \ 9 ' .� ,.0�1 V v n o -O -O -O- o�o�ouo�o. o_6 8 8 o�go ����,�n�, 0,0 Oho ;_ Oo: O n o V O -o -o -o -o MOW ``` i• 96 SI% o0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i �- I 960.9 4 I iX g6 1X 96 a,' II I LINE ; \I I I �� MOW II I 1 rn (y LINE 7 /X 96 j 1. \ 1 I I I 3/ rn I I I �,ne�o nBUILDING D II l I II I,1 , I; BUILDING C 6 976 SF (�6� ! 9611 ; I X 960.6 I I °' X X 963.9 964.5 x II i II #�6�1° y�;! CO 6,976 SF III I g621°i' '� n X 960. jI '9638 I I 1; I 962• I + II F`/ FE= 963.50 Wo�� NCE FFE=963.50 N I! W I964.4 COI109 II 0) ON o LINE 9 1099 2.; I QQ I o II I I INI , II11. / �I I aX9 96 -a-r .- -_ • • I \• a CJL{L`Y t • 9 11 17 I I II ^6�. - - --, . Fi 5 3 I �\ I I . , I.9s _ 4363 .__ __ • ---_- 9 ?8\ 6� 1 96hI X95 1.61 I X 963.8 Oi s ZE 0 231 I1 i`°e° 9s I I �\I F I 9�,ti -- s��° 196, I �' CR X 5 .5 a6� .. -«g62 --» --» 2O *-� \ X Ig X 963.8 1�9 2.3I ° 0,6� _»_-_N-- N-_»-_»-_» »--»-- -r I959.4 iI _ _._._._.-._._._._. _._._._._._._._._ _._ ._ _ _ +.._._._._.._._ _._ �- I I � 9 962.... i, oo ,CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER + \- °96ti°j i• I a-)5.1 FT. EAST OF LOT LINE I \ / / ,iI I I �� II11II11I ° 8; a a � �' -v• ' ° .e - I _i I�°•• .. e\ 3 1I 96 I i' 1 IIiIi I� Ii� oI ?59. 0 59.0 I 11' 963.4X X 962.7• ti ? I 1[ 963 �------------ o --- - o X 961.3 II\II I \ \ \\ \ \ \\ \\ \\\ \\ \X 962.4109 /0) CHAINLINK ---�^ 9'4'2A III I X 961.8 I 61.2 X FENCE + \- I II _ J l i SII o 1 \ o ON LOT LINE. I Ito III // \. �� II96��I 10 o \ \\ yo 960.5 1 I' ��'� BUILDING F - BUILDING E �f' i i - °'6ry i I \ I v `°it,- 1 \ X 958.6 • 6, 976 SF _ / Il. 6, 9 76 SF I I - ! 11 I ; II I 1 1 FFE=963.50 "6� - x9,60.4 11 I FFE=96 3 I 1 0 1 1 ! p; h Q. 9 jl)61 X 961.5 I � x 9 9 ,' II --5.1 \-cnZ/ 62.1k I v u o 0 0 0 0 0 0" o" o i J 1 o I X 962.6 (j . I 1 n o 0 0 o o O o v n o o"'o'' 0 0 0 0 0' o 0 0�o S°o ol°0 0 0 0 0 o_o_n ^ \' v u u o-o-o-o-o-o'''o'''o o„0 0 0 o„A,. c._o_o _o_o O n I. I` v u O-O-O-O-O"O�O"O�O''O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n n n Zy I _O"O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ! ; 1 Xuo; 9 �1 �.8 X 958.7 / f " ° Now967 ■ I \ 1 1 96,9 y' 1-cp °6 o. �,._. o ACCESS DRIVE AND it O _ 06 g �+ \-. _._._.. I 1 �,_ -.._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._.__._._._.._._._._.._ ._._._._. fi ASSOCIATED UTILITIES TO ACCESS DRIVE AND -¢ " -' "-». I �� rn I 1 6 �� r, I BE INSTALLED AS PART OF ASSOCIATED UTILITIES TO a9'�o g6� �� g6� I II PHASE 1 IMPROVEMENTS BE INSTALLED AS PART OF ; / / 961.4 TX 961.3 0 ! 1 961 .4 PHASE 1 IMPROVEMENTS \�11 � v \ x I 1 Ij -,v I ! v u o o -o -o -o oY go 1 F 9'• - �o�o poOo onon0 0 0 0 0 �, 1 Ojb "o�o,,,,o„ „o-O_oO^O.O.O_n , Io"o-o"o"o"ovou000000000000000�o;,o 0 1 962so I \ I I I \ X 959.9 < [ X_961.0 it I1 I X961.3 1 BUILDING H X 962.7 gotiy BUILDING G 6,976 SF 11 6, 976 SF x a61. li I CO { CHAINLINK l962.3lI FFE=963.50 lI l FENCE + FFE=963. I I/ X 960.7 0.5 FT. WEST 109 ;I I II OF LOT LINE. 109 1 I 'I ^3 I , , - a\ • e• Y Z I cn 04 0 962.3°I I I -- ---3 ==- - --� _.► s -- - _ 9�i bti��l % rn O) - I I �s-- 6° X � 1.1 � i I I 6° \\ 6° I \ 6L' 6`1'' nCi.;• % ! i i X 960.6 1961.80 ` �G 96ti' �0'6� I I k9 0� 951.7 961 I i \\� 2 4 I I I �o`1'j •`gyp I I 0 ! 9 ii o 20 X 962.4 I ! I 6, /. 9 5 � / h I I -------------- ----------- ! 9 ` ' ------------------ -------------- o / 6 6 s' 962.6X s o1h° �� o61h I _ 61�__________________ - - 962.9 _ 61 ------------- o ------------ 's = ' x ��c�r��� 962 - ------ - ° o 962-----�---------""IL .---------- "- - I C' � 1 .960 \ I �I, . c 960 P62 IZ 959 958 �� s° LANDSCAPE \ I \II �( 959 958 x ' 957- s� \ \\�+9s°I EDGING/MULCH 957 956 s so I l I S° 61 0 ,-_ CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER + - �� 1 ► >6�� 9S� 956 _ �,o^� so / 962.2 \ - M +96 9 \ .°° XX961.8 \ s°I 5.8 FT. EAST OF LOT LINE 967.2 ; - ! \\ / r'�/ 956 +��'�096� 9 ---SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST \� _ _ 956 u QA9 3 957 . 1 I 121 R 25 V 0 30 60 90 GRAPHIC SCALE /N FEET SURVEY DATA SURVEY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY: MEYER ROHLIN LAND SERVICES 708 1st AVENUE NE BUFFALO, MN 55313 DATED: APRIL 18, 2017 BENCHMARK: MN/DOT GEODETIC MONUMENT "8605 S" ELEVATION = 966.55 NAVD88 DATUM PROJECT LOCATION PART OF THE SW41 AND NES, SECTION 14 TOWNSHIP 121, RANGE 25, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA. EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 2, BLOCK 3, OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA. � w � ctW kr)~ O W) ' M ct ct C\� W O ct cn ~ c too co Lu � N O co mow, M .cu a. O W w PROJECT PHASING TIMELINE c CD c o PHASE 1 2017-2018 WORK TO INCLUDE: MASS GRADE PHASE 1-4 AREAS; INSTALL SANITARY, WATER, LV c __j CL AND STORM SEWER ON PHASE 1-4 AREAS; INSTALL STORMWATER MANAGEMENT z c� BASIN; INSTALL TEMPORARY 4" DEPTH TOPSOIL AND ESTABLISH TEMPORARY TURF W O z WITHIN PHASE 2-4 LIMITS; INSTALL BUILDINGS G AND H, CONCRETE CURB, AND p � m IQ PAVEMENT IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN PHASE 1 LIMITS; INSTALL PERMANENT 6" DEPTH ,V TOPSOIL, LANDSCAPE PLANTINGS, AND ESTABLISH PERMANENT TURF WITHIN()c00 C PHASE 1 LIMITS Z v- O CL PHASE 2 2018-2019 WORK TO INCLUDE REMOVE TEMPORARY TURF AND TEMPORARY TOPSOIL WITH uu PHASE 2 LIMITS, INSTALL BUILDINGS A AND B, CONCRETE CURB, AND PAVEMENT IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN PHASE 2 LIMITS; INSTALL PERMANENT 6" DEPTH TOPSOIL, Mom LANDSCAPE PLANTINGS, AND ESTABLISH PERMANENT TURF WITHIN PHASE 2 LIMITS C� PHASE 3 2020-2021 WORK TO INCLUDE REMOVE TEMPORARY TURF AND TEMPORARY TOPSOIL WITH PHASE 3 LIMITS, INSTALL BUILDINGS C AND D, CONCRETE CURB, AND PAVEMENT IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN PHASE 3 LIMITS; INSTALL PERMANENT 6" DEPTH TOPSOIL, LANDSCAPE PLANTINGS, AND ESTABLISH PERMANENT TURF WITHIN PHASE 3 LIMITS PHASE 4 2022-2023 WORK TO INCLUDE REMOVE TEMPORARY TURF AND TEMPORARY TOPSOIL WITH PHASE 4 LIMITS, INSTALL BUILDINGS E AND F, CONCRETE CURB, AND PAVEMENTco o IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN PHASE 3 LIMITS; INSTALL PERMANENT 6" DEPTH TOPSOIL, c:y LANDSCAPE PLANTINGS, AND ESTABLISH PERMANENT TURF WITHIN PHASE 3 LIMITS o N o (oN o U W O w Fr I -02 �d U U) o z � W ° S � MARKET CONDITIONS MAY RESULT IN MODIFICATION OF Q� q m o PHASING TIMELINE AND PHASING OF SITE IMPROVEMENTS. r o ( 1 w °o 4�Q: Lo! a, Q_ c 3 N ►� '00 ra o O � J 'ti -z-,, ta \ m O 3 a - o ai q) CHAINLINK CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER + \- �IiC E`'T - - - 958 957 ` �' _ - - 959 958 SO \ 1 1/4 OF SECTION 14, T. , 0.4 FT. WEST OF LOT CORNER l i T'�. 959 .960 9n1.�' -� N 89°14 00 E „ x �0J.4 ! N 89°14 00 E- X01 960 ---r----- --------- o -------------- --X--- _---- i ----- ------ ------------- ------962-----2yy1 w 14Uu" E----- 9962 �O_,1----- - ------3123.56-- -- �.� ---- -- 963 T -- 1 [ - - - --- 964.2 X ,, J O O - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -------------------- Z x 9�. ��---- X C It / X 961.3 L _ _ _------ 963.7 6�- - \���y - - - - - L = - 61-_962- mow1 / o 3 -, -;° ° °a°°° _�_ R ---_ _-- --9 ca`___ --�-�-- 6 INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: Q6 - - LINE - -e--960 ; Q�\\���� qC 958.96 = _ _ _ _ _ ` _ _SHEDX961-6-961-f-- '960. 961.6 g61 - - _ '` ��T S \�\� CURB xi (- - ``__9 ANDSCAPE2 CO PROJECT LOCATION PLAN Goh°' X \9,59, Oho STOP 960.5 i --TEL. _X X �\ RISER EDGING/MULCH C1 SITE PLAN �1b LANDSCAPE -I GOLDEN EAGLE ROAD h�1 ��CB � ', _ • O � SOUTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL C2 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN Oh EDGING/ROCK ELEV.=958.16----= � r-------r- 8c SHRUBS I � PARK (DOC.# 275353) AS MONUMENTED; ALSO C3 SANITARY AND WATER UTILITY PLAN SAN MH x I NORTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF KLEIN FARMS I I I C4 STORM SEWER UTILITY PLAN ELEV.=958.59--. 958.7 I ESTATES 2ND ADDITION (DOC.# 753470) I I I C5 LANDSCAPE PLAN - - F -- - - - - -I- - - - - -C6 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C7 EXISTING CONDITIONS AND REMOVALS PLAN �`'I I I I I I C8 D ETAI LS I I/ I I I F__n F -)A ,h �` 11- �` _T_n I� F_ r- °h� �N I I n n� I _T_1 C9 PHASING PLAN FILE NO. 00633 C9 Phasinq Plan m o m o W a W ti 0 Q o a W 6 FILE NO. 00633 C9 Phasinq Plan TRUSS BRNG. ELEV. 109'-0" TRUSS BRNG. ELEV. 116'-O" STEEL SIDING COLOR "A' TRUSS BRN�. ELEV. 109'- " CORNER TRIM FIN. FLOOR ELEV. 100'-0" CULTURED STONE PROVIDED ON NOi OF NORTH BUIDINC SOUTH WALL OF SOUTH BUILDINGS ONLY WOOD POST W/ METAL WRAP 3C,4LE: 1/8" = 1'-O" TRUSS BRNG. ELEV. 116'-O" EEL SIDING COLOR "A" CORNER TRIM STEEL SIDING COLOR "B" FIN. FLOOR ELEV. 100'-O" TRUSS BRNG. ELEV. 116'-O" STEEL SIDING COLOR "f CORNER TRIM STEEL SIDING COLOR "B" ,AFIN. FLOOR ELEV. 100'-0" METAL WRAP j C ,4 L: I/ 8 = I'— V ,JbTRUSS BRNG. ELEV. 116'-O" STEEL SIDING COLOR " CORNER TRIM STEEL SIDING COLOR "B" �JhFIN. FLOOR ELEV. 100'-0" SCALE: 1/8" = I' -U" METAL WRAP TRUSS BRNG. ELEV. 109'-O" F�E,4R ELEV/4T10N SC,4LE: 1/8" = 1'-O" fv � I.I.I N w ZH GJ s s z CK m 0 m w F ro,leat No. °2 1,101,91 0 C Iasue Dzte ?-?? J C oc iment S t: V???? 0 w 0 J d TRUSS BRNG. ELEV. 116'-0" STEEL SIDING COLOR "A" TRUSS BRNG. ELEV. 109'-0" CORNER TRIM 10• I AFIN. FLOOR ELEV. 100'-0" CULTURED STONE PROVIDED ON NORTH WALL OF NORTH BUIDINGS AND SOUTH WALL OF SOUTH BUILDINGS ONLY TRUSS BRN� ELEV. 116'- -- 2 1:2 12 STEEL SHAKE SIDING WOOD POST W/ METAL WRAP TRUSS BRNG. ELEV. 116'-0" FfP,,0 NT ELE\/� SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 12 / TION �i STEEL SIDING COLOR "A" STEEL SIDING COLOR "A" TRUSS BRNGG,-NP�I ELEV. 109'- b ------- CORNER TRIM CORNER TRIM ,,—STEEL SIDING COLOR "B" STEEL SIDING COLOR "B" FIN. FLOOR FIN. FLOOR ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------- ------ ELEV. 100'-0" ELEV. 100'-0" SIEDE ELEVATION SIIDE ELEV74TION WOOD POST SCALE: 1/8„ , „ „ , = I O SCALE: 1/8 = 1'-0” „ 4:: TRUSS BRNG. ELEV. 116'-0" J STEEL SIDING COLOR "A" } CORNER TRIM i STEEL SIDING COLOR "B" q FIN. FLOOR ELEV. 100'-0" _= awi WOOD POST W/ METAL WRAP RE,,4R ELE\/�TI0N SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 4:1: TRUSS BRNG ELEV. 109'- ■ 0 ■ z s U z rn, i�Ti •7R���� I'10i9 0 C Issue Otte; w ??-;?-?? C oc ime nt S t: ■ ■ �i J_ r � Z --I ■ 0 ■ z s U z rn, i�Ti •7R���� I'10i9 0 C Issue Otte; w ??-;?-?? C oc ime nt S t: ■ ■ �i 109'-01, 61_01; 2,_3„ 12,_6„ 3,_3„ 61_01, 6,_O„ 6,_O„ 2,_9„ 12,_6„ 2,_9„ 3,_311 12,_6„ 2'-3" 6'-O" 6'-O" 6'-6" ®EM�® 3070 I mmm mmm 3070 3070 INSUL. U L ®■® - - INSUL. - - - INSUL. - - - STEEL J x I IXI I F #� _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Iw I • Ix] 1 Ixl x Ixl I I #� IXI I I )CI I I Iw Ixl 1XI �F ° _ _ _ _ _ _ _ �lxl 1XI I ________ IXI I ?� I — 4020 `—� `I `— ----4020 �_� �t —I, I_ ABO 4020 U) ABOVE I ABOVE I I ABOVE I I I I I I U Ep � U o�c I o�c I I o�2 ODl9 9) al ��� u / \\ I I I I I I / \ � Ln y� 0 I I I I I I I I d N 3 I I X 3 I I I I I I ap I, I I I I y I I 12' x-14' O.H.D. 1 12'_x 14' O.H.D. I 12'—x 14' O.H.D. �- � I I — E +' i c p I X X I 10 v y y N I I U u' a m I m _ E Q a l y a u> m I v' Q �-N ' 7 QI y � " WHAREHOUSE WHAREHOUSE WHAREHOUSE _ $ .' _ 1 I �I y E r 8,_2,. �,_1„ 1q,_6„ �,_6„ 81_211 8,_2„ 5,_�„ 18,_O„ 1q,_6„ �,_1„ R '01 ME 73 q)57< X X m v \\ \\ aSL W 73 F O � I � 0 I n I (n (n (n x (LLJn cLU LU n cn X '.. a- a- 0- I 3070 II t INSUL. 3070 r= II - ----- --I 3070 oo I- U v' :STEEL �, IF INSL.��FNSUL. Z pv 1-- -STEEL -STEEL - \ X R-STROOM I RES fR00M RESTROQM \ X 4,-- * ------ ---' * i 3070 3070 3070 INSUL. INSUL. INSUL. STEEL STEEL STEEL L O r O - 0 — z C5.. OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE z o O ao z 4020 4020 - 4020 4040 / v / v / v_ABOVE / / �v / v 4040 / v / �v / �v ABOVE _,' �v �v / v ABOVE _1_ v / �v / �v 4040 X I I j l XI I I IXI I 1 .. � SITE NOTES 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL LABOR, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT NECESSARY FOR A COMPLETE AND FUNCTIONAL ELECTRICAL SYSTEM. 2. MATERIALS AND INSTALLATION SHALL COMPLY WITH CODES, UTILITY REQUIREMENTS, LAWS AND ORDINANCES OF FEDERAL, STATE, OSHA AND LOCAL GOVERNING BODIES HAVING JURISDICTION. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL CODES AND STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO THIS PROJECT THAT ARE LISTED BUT NOT LIMITED TO: NEC, NFPA, NEMA, ANSI, IES, IEEE, NFPA LIFE SAFETY 101, ASHRAE 90.1, IECC ENERGY CODE AND IBC BUILDING CODE. 4. PRIOR TO ANY DIGGING, TRENCHING, ETC. CONTACT ALL LOCAL UTILITY COMPANIES AND MUNICIPALITIES AND CONFIRM EXACT LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. 5. MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT SHALL BE LISTED AND/OR LABELED BY UL OR ANOTHER NATIONALLY RECOGNIZED TESTING LABORATORY. 6. ALL MATERIAL, EQUIPMENT, WIRING DEVICES, ETC SHALL BE NEW, UNLESS SPECIFICALLY NOTED AS EXISTING TO BE REUSED. 7. ALL MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT SHALL BE STORED, HANDLED, ERECTED, INSTALLED, CONNECTED, CLEANED, ADJUSTED, TESTED, CONDITIONED AND PLACED IN SERVICE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUFACTURERS DIRECTIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. 8. COORDINATE THE UTILITY COMPANY SERVICE FEEDS AND INSTALLATION. 9. ALL POLE FIXTURES TO BE LOCATED 4' AWAY FROM EDGE OF CURB. 10. ALL EXTERIOR LIGHT FIXTURES TO BE CONNECTED TO A COMMON EQUIPMENT GROUND. USE #8, TYPE THWN. 11. ALL CIRCUIT TO BE PLACED IN 1" CONDUITS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. CIRCUIT TO USE COPPER WIRE, TYPE THWN. 12. THE CONTROLLING LIGHTING CONTACTORS SHALL BE MOUNTED INSIDE THE BUILDING WITH TIME -CLOCK CONTROL & REMOTE PHOTOCELLS LOCATED ON THE EXTERIOR SIDE OF THE BUILDING WALL. INSTALL PHOTOCELLS AT LOCATIONS WHERE BUILDING OR OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS WILL NOT INTERFERE WITH THEIR PROPER OPERATION. FINAL BRANCH CIRCUIT SUPPLY CONNECTIONS WILL BE PROVIDED BY THE BUILDING ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS. 13. MIN. BURIAL DEPTH FOR THE LIGHTING CIRCUIT SHALL BE 24". A SLIGHT DECREASE IN DEPTH IS ALLOWED WITHIN 10' OF THE POLES. 14. VERIFY CONSTRUCTION AREAS ON OTHER SITE PLANS FOR POTENTIAL OBSTACLES AND CONSTRUCTION LIMITS. ELECTRIC GENERAL NOTES 1. ALL WORK SHALL BE COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH NATIONAL, STATE AND LOCAL ELECTRICAL CODES. 2. ENERGY CODE WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASHRAE 90.1 2010. 3. COORDINATE WORK WITH ALL OTHER TRADES. 4. EQUIPMENT SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. 5. ALL WIRING SHALL BE INSTALLED IN APPROVED RACEWAYS. 6. ALL EQUIPMENT GROUNDING CONDUCTORS SHALL BE INSTALLED AT ALL LOCATIONS. 7. ALL MEASUREMENTS TO TOP OF BOX. RECEPTACLES SHALL BE 20" A.F.F. SWITCHES SHALL BE 48" A.F.F. 8. GFI PROTECT ALL RECEPTACLES WITHIN 6' OF EVERY SINK. II II �I t1 II T -rte �� '-----------------------------� II II 11 I I II II II 1 II I I n +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 II + + + + + +0 + + + \ 10. + +0.71 1 1� 02dI 0.4 05 0.4U0 0.5 0.6 0.5 03 0.7 0.7 06 0.6 1,0 0. 1 i�a1 ii \ II II II + + + + + + X11 + 11 + 0.1 11 0.3 .5 2.8 1.3 6.4 1.0 6.2�, AA 2.6 l!l2 0.1 1 0.1 ii O AA AA n AA " AA qA" II i0.1 .111 0.2 11 0.1 +0.3 11 0.1 i I I 0.2 .1 11 11 I /� II +0.1 +0.11 +0.7 l i 1.2 BUILDING A ; BUILDING B +2_i +0.9 i i '122 +0.1 I I 1 i, J.2 II SAA 11 AAc 6 976 SU 6,976 SC ;; 11 0.2 +0.1 t)` I 1.3 i +4.-/ 9 +30 +0.9 +0.2 +0.1 11 + +0.211 ill i ii 10.2 + � II + + I + 1 + _V1 0.1 +0.211 0.6 n. 0.9 0 0.3 11 II I j 1 II 0.1 ii 11 I i I to.1 7W11 i i +0.2 +d'� AA + a +„ + + u + + + + + 1.7 4.7 1.6 0.7 3.1 3.3 1.7 4.7 1.1 + 0.2 11 0.1 0.1 i i l 0.1 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + .1 11 0.2 0.8 2.2 1.5 1.7 1.8 0.8 1.0 1.9 1.5 1.8 1.1 0.7 1.3 1.4 1.2 1.4 0.7 0.2 11 111 0.1 l i !I 11 II+ + + + + + + _ _ _ _ _ - - -- - ---- � - 1 n --_F -F--- + + + + + + Q1 11 0.2 0.6 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.0 0.7 0.8 1.2 1.2 1.2 0.9 0.7 1.1 + + + + 1.2 1.0 1.2 0.7 0.2 11 0.1 10.1 + II 1 0.1 II 1 11 0.2 0.9 2.9 1.8 2.3 2.8 0.8 1.2 3.6 ¢'.0 3.8 1.8 0.8 3.0 2.9 1.5 4.4 _+1.2 0.2 1111 +�Oi1 1 - O O 1 11 // n n L --- O -- ___� I L - -_� L -_-J 0.1 +@i 11 +0.2 �I"+0.2--- ---� 1 J 11 +0.411 II +0.3 i i +C2 +0.1 0.2 �.1'II II I I 1 1 I II II n n I 1 ! 11 +0.1 +2 +0.5 11 +0.8 i 1.9 { { 1.0 i i +6112 +0.1 0.2i1' " BUILDING C BUILDING D H 9 76 SC SAA 11 ii .3 +0.1 +0131 i 1.0 i i+6 c 6, 9 7 6 S C 9 +4.4 111 1.5 111 +0.3 +0.1 0.2 10. 11 0.3 +0.1 +012 Iii +0.7 }2.0 i +0.8 1 +0.6 i i +0+Q.2 +0.1 III II 1 I I I II -01 }0.211 II I i 1 11 II 1111 �+ T0. + AA + IAA' + ii ii 11 `AA AA +O.Q Iii +0.3 11'1+0.4 u uAq 0.2 1.9gq 7.1 9 8Y + + 0.4 + 10.11 .1 11 0.2 it 0 0.1 0.1 II _ =�__-___= _�_-===�-T=====__� + + - Lr+- ----+- + + + + + + + + +� + + +14 + + 0..1 0.1 0.2 1.4 2.8 L 11 11 i 11 9 1.3 1 3 2.1 0.6 LO 1.8 0.8 1 U 1.0 1.0 1 4 0.4 I I 0.1 0.1111 � \ I I 11 + I + + + + + + + + + + +\ + + + + 0.2 0.3 0.3 ' 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.� 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 +0.1 11 II II _._.- -------- i -- - - - - - ---_-._._._._ - --- -- - ---_- - - u-- - - - - -- #----4 ----+ _ + _ + -+ + + + + + + + + + + 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 II II II rrf � II n �' 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 \ \D 0.4 0.5 0. 0.4 0.7 0.5 \\ 0.6 0.6 0.8 i1 0.3 I 0.1 11, � 111 II II ii I� \ 11 II II IIL � -_ "kms =_ _� --=t=- �L k __ _ _ _-___ -_ +- _ �++ +-_ -+- �- + + +0.1 2 LT�� r� 1 =_- - - 5.1 0.6 1.3 7. O.5 0.1 11'+0.1 0.1 I I OAA X0.1 i i i i AA 0 AA AA _ n AA AAo II II I I I I 1 II 11 0.1 +0.1 '0.1 1 i +0.2 2 i 1 '0.2 +0.3 110.2 +0.1 + II +0.1 0.2 11 0.1 0.1 11 0.4 0 2.0 11 1.6 0.4+0.2 +0.1 + + ' 11+ �I BUILDING S + 17- +0.211 BUILDING E SAA 11 + + 0.311+ 11 AAc 6 9 76 SU 1 6 9 9 76 SC 1111 + Illill -0.2 + 0.1 0.2 11 0.7 5 9 2.6 1.9 �.4 0.1 0.2 10.311 1 II II I I I II + + I+ +I + + 0.1 0.1 10.2ii 0.5 1i 1 0.4 11 2'0.1 0.1 I I III II I I I I II r '01 r ---r I r ---r 0 1 11 U V i +0.1 • 1+0.2 +0 u.2 " +2.6 + . 1.4 3.6 2.6 +0.4 I .1 0.1 +0.1 n 1 +0.1 111+0.2 +0.5 1.9 +2.3 1.5 +2.4 1.1 +0.8 1.9 1.9 1.8 1.8 +0.8 1.0 1.7 1.2 1.5 1.2 +0.4 14.1 +0.1 +0.1 ; I I 0.1 0.1 911111@.r ---0.'t---0.8---.6_- 1.0 1.0 0.8 --0.7 0.9 1.1 1f 1.1 1.0 0.7 ---0.8 1.1 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.4._._._111_,. n n 1 n 0.1 10.1 + F + + + + + + + + + ' + + + + + + + + + 0.1 1 110.1 0.4 1.5 2.2 1.4 2.5 1.2 0.7 2.2 2.4 ! 2.3 2.8 0.8 1.4 3.4 1.4 2.7 2.5 0.4 �1 �0.1 0.1 11 0 I�--- A L 1 I -- IL - 0.1 0.1 0. - 1.a .4 �---� ' ` - I 1. I 1 11+0.2 11 0.1 +0.111 I� ii it i0.1 II II I I 1 I II II +0.1+ 0.2 1 11.1 +oi +0.2+0.1 °•211 BUILDING G BUILDING H + 11 SAA ;; ;II 0.2 +0.1 00.4 +2.11 AAc 6 976 S C 1+3.2 +0! +0.1 1 ;1 6, 976 SC 9 10.211 .1 0.2 i I I +0.11.4 1.� i.6 i 1 1.0 +Oil 0.2+0.1 0.211 11 I I I 1 ! I I q1 F + r 1 ! 0.1 +0.1 0.1 '�.2 +0.� 1.2 u F j AAu u AA AAu Y0.9 S.2 +0!1 +0.1 + l u AA AAu AA 111 1 i0.1 0.1 �i1 0.11 0.5 115 1.5 1.� 3.5 0.9 34 1.21 I 0.6 27 1.3 22 0.9 2.2 1 0.9 0.1 I \� 11 � � 1 � � I /i 1 N i \ II + + + + + + ! + + + + +0 II 0.1 ) 0.4 '0.4 0.L 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.3 '0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 1 ELECTRICAL SITE LIGHTING PLAN E1.1 SCALE: 1" = 30' 0 15' 30' 60' LIGHTING LEGEND F-7-1 RECESSED 2x4 FLUORESCENT FIXTURE Z RECESSED 2x2 FLUORESCENT FIXTURE 0 INDICATES NIGHTLIGHT FIXTURE INDICATES EMERGENCY FIXTURE ® INDICATES EMERGENCY/NIGHTLIGHT FIXTURE I� SURFACE MOUNT 1x4 FLUORESCENT FIXTURE D HIGH BAY 2x4 FLUORESCENT FIXTURE SURFACE WALL MOUNTED FLUORESCENT FIXTURE SURFACE CEILING MOUNT FLUORESCENT FIXTURE 0 RECESSED DOWNLIGHT + SURFACE WALL MOUNTED FIXTURE SURFACE MOUNTED FIXTURE SURFACE MOUNTED PENDANT FIXTURE OUTSIDE POLE -MOUNT LIGHT FIXTURE EXTERIOR GROUND MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE EMERGENCY LIGHTING FIXTURE LED EXIT SIGN -SHADED AREA INDICATES ILLUMINATED FACE LED EXIT/EMERGENCY SIGN -SHADED AREA INDICATES ILLUMINATED FACE EXTERIOR EMERGENCY EGRESS LIGHT SINGLE POLE SWITCH $2 2 -POLE SWITCH $3 3 -WAY SWITCH $4 4 -WAY SWITCH sp SWITCH W/PILOT LIGHT OS1 WALL MOUNTED SINGLE LEVEL OCCUPANCY SENSOR FO -S2 WALL MOUNTED DUAL LEVEL OCCUPANCY SENSOR OS CEILING MOUNTED OCCUPANCY SENSOR NL INDICATES FIXTURE TO REMAIN ON FOR SECURITY PURPOSES A,B INDICATES LIGHT FIXTURE SWITCH -LEGS P -X INDICATES PANEL AND CIRCUIT NUMBER O INDICATES LIGHT FIXTURE TYPE EX INDICATES EXISTING FIXTURE RL INDICATES RELOCATED FIXTURE TC INDICATES FIXTURE CONTROLLED BY TIMECLOCK EM INDICATES EMERGENCY FIXTURE LIGHTING FIXTURE SCHEDULE TYPE LAMPS WATTAGE DESCRIPTION NOTES AA LED 26 LED WALL PACK, 4000K - NOTES: WPLED26 F I Projrct: Typo: Prepared By: Oats: Driver Info LED tela Type: Corstant Current Wars- 21 4'0 121111: 0211A Color Tel 500DK 2D6V- 0.16A Color Accuracy. 70 CRI 24611- 0.14A L7o Lhilitil 100000 21711:0.12A Lumens: 2.662 Inpvl Watts: 30W Elncacy: 90 LPW LED 26W Wallpacks. PA -1: Pending Ilrerrrral managerl system. 1f10•a00 hour Eflfclerl 88% L7011fespan$ Year Warranty. Color Ill Weigni 7.5 lbs Technical Specifications z Listings Ambient Tamporature: Country of Origin: UL Listing: Suitable for use in old°C ambienl lemperelwes. Designed by RAB in New Jersey and assembled in the Sullable for wet Iorallpns Suitable far moungrlg vat Cold Weather Slarll ng: USA by R9B's IBEW LWAI3 markers. 1.2m (4a) of the gmurM. Country of Origin: Dark Sky Approved: The minimum starting IampereWre is 40.6. Thermal Management: Designed by RA13 In New Jersey and assembled in The Internallbnal Dark Sky Assmalron has approved Taiwan. this Product as a full -toff, lolly shielded fumineire. Cast aluminum Thennel Management system forTrade Agreements Act Compliant: DLC Listed: optimal heat Sinking. The LPACK is designed for coal operation, most efficient oulpol and maximum LED life Thig product is a product of Taiwan and a "oesignaled TMs product Is on the Deatgn Lights CMSorl (DLC( by minimizing LEDjunctim tampetALUM. col end product that camptles w11h rile Trade Oualfaed Products List and is eligible fa raberes from Green Technology: Agreements Aa- DLCMember utilities. w GSA Sichedul0: DLC Preduat Code- Pa000170I Mercury and uV free. RoH3 car lianl components. U LED Charactaristica PplyEsler powder coat finish formulated wftout the Suitable in accordance vin FAR Subpar 25.4. O use of VDc or toxic Heavy metals. Equivalency: Lifespan: For use on LEED Buildings: to 175W Molal Halide. 100,0Mhour LED lifespan basad on IES LM -80 IDA Dark Sky means foal dos fhQure can ba Optical Opdea[ results and TW21 nal-ulatluna. used 10 ecmave TEED Credits for Light Pollution a LEEDl Calor Consistency: Reduction, BUG Rating: 7 -step Machdam Edlpse Wring to achlave oonsistanr Eloctrioal B1 U0 Go fl dune-ro-0alure -tor. Driver! BUG Rating: Color Stability: MuQicMp 26W high oulput long life LED Driver 61 Lia Go LED color tamperatum is warranded! Io shift no more Constant Current, 720rnA, Class 2, BkV Surge ii 200K in CCT over a 5 year period. Protection, l llDV-277V, 50.89 Mg. 100.24011.4 AMPS. Color Uniformity: THD' RAB's range of CCT (Correlated Color Temperature] 7.5% at 12W, 11%at 27711 follows trm g"'IdInes of he Amarican National other 5lonrded for Spedrmdon5 for rhe Chrom irity of Solid Slate Lignling 1831] Products. ANSI C7a.977- California Title 24: 2015. Sea WFLE02r><PC for a 2013 California Tfte 24 Construction compliant modal. IP Rating: Patients: Ingress Protection rating or IKE for dust end water Th. WPLED design ie protected by U.S. Pat. D594878, Canada Pat 134878, CNna Pat. Finish; CN301949IXi45. Cor envimnmenuft friendly polyester powder coatings are lormilill for high -d rmblll and long-lasting calor, and contains no VOC a twcic heavy metas. Need harp? Tach help line: 1886) FLAB- 5000 Email: ealss@r.1-Bl .corn Wabslla: www.rahwah.com Copynghl l 2014 RAB Llghfu+g Inc. AN Rights Reserved NMB: sperigcatill am subject W change at any are without notice WPLED26 ❑irnensions IIvlrte lfreR fkt�Ya __4 Jrrna. ao.r pL rdW Ordering Matrix Family watts Color Temp -PLED I 211= 2fiW Blank = ii (Cocl) V = 3DWK (Warm} N = 40ODK lNeutral) Pegs 1 or 1 Features kfign performance LED right engine Nsainlaina 70% of initial -mens at 100,0010 hauls WealheprdOf high temperature silicone gaskets Supanor heal Sinking with die cast aluminum Musing and external fins 1Da up to 277 Vohs `✓year Warrarry Sensor Filml Prow l Dimming Blank = No Sensor Blank - Bnonm Blank = No Photocell Blank = No Dfmmlrrg MS = Mini Sensor W = white Me = 12011 Button 1610 = Dlmrrlable ]PCS = 120V Swivel Ill = 277V Budde Need relp? Te h holy tine (seal RAB-t000 Email. sales*rabwub.com Wobsnel www.rabwob.com Copyngh192014 RAB Lighting Inc. All Rights Reserved Note: Specifioauons are subject to change at any time will real w a 0 w a z z 0 U Cn LLJ 0 z 0 Ld IY •• z O = LL_ CD U W W D F__ O Cn M w Q W U M M o O Lv Lv In O LIJ U J J � Z z = Q w 0 •• z O = LL_ CD U W W D F__ O Cn z Q W U O o J J ry In O c U 0 LLI 3 z W SHEET N0. E1.1 ALTA I NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY FOR KENNETH SPAETH I � r� I ol: `, h I - - 10" D.I.P. l i- \ ® 15" R.C.P. m a ro cl� _P, o 0END OF { �N MH i i - - s 1 960 RIM ELEV.=960.04 00' SAN MH DUNDAS ROAD o z 60 0 0 0 0,, -CULVERT < o BURIED 960.0 959.90 INV. ELE)�.=942.8 RIM ELEV.=961.96 ��� 961.11 / 960.66, , ��p D - ' 'I 6 ) ( - ) ( ) ` 959.79 i INV. ELEV.=943.7 °� _ _ _ _ - ( �\ - 960-(S 90°00 00 E Plat) _ ". _ x 958.6 _ - -959- - - i - -961- 1�1 X 9.7 959.2X N 88°36 53 E 9 - '�C 959.31 T - T= cv - 960.6 X #� oNt --fi T T T 300. ooh - S9 �T� -I�� �� q�n_ EL. RISER -� I- - - - - - - , L -0-961-- X_-- ---o -962----�- 961.9 6� � X - X - `� X961.5 962.1 962.9__" __--�C-- - -- - -_ _ rt� - ---�--J�61.5 0,`� i 962.5- 962.4 24" CMP -962- _ I\� '-UTILITY CULVERT \- --96,3- EASEMENT- - - - - _ DRIVEWAY 963.0 X 962.9 ` _ X 963. f-_ ACCESS TO X 962.5 > o 962. 9 962.8X Q 9 \--MOW -963- _ - PUBLIC STREET 962.3xI LINE °D cl� c 1 Q X962.2 -_// \ I T T o X962.2 X963.5 X 961.9 X61.9 l 962.5 / 963.1 X � o / ` 1 1 X 964.2 r - \g ` / 1 \ I X \ U 09 X 961.9 / 962.0 X 961.3 X 96�]Q 5 \ � \ I N ��ti Mow \ \ I 0963.7 X it X 961.5 96.5X i X 9B11 BX 963.7 0 964.3 h �o I X 961.2 - X 962.5X 961.7 I III \ MOW, l i 960.9 �C9 �C96� 0 0 LINE LEGEND -T UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE SANITARY SEWER STORM SEWER WA TERMAIN i X961.7 rX961.p X961.0 \i�-MOWI I ❑ LINE I \ I � I / 962.0II II I 964.5 I I / / \96�\ i X 960" X 950. ? U X 96X 963.9 X I ,--WOOD FENCE 964.4 I CORNER +\- I I I I `/ .1(� -962.5 ON LOT LINE X 961.7 I 1 2 -950- - X 961.5 X 960.4 I I I I 96� X 960.7 - X959.6 IX 960.5' 0 I X 963.8 - - - - -952- W \ , PILE OF BRUSH/SMALL a' \ / TREES (RECENTLY - �\ o� x 961.1 p Imo•• CLEARED FROM SITE) '� X X 59.51 196�� po �o X 962.3 I \�9U 9. ( X 963.8 o p i I 961.4 961.4 I\ I co \CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER +\- ❑ oil � , �� I - CONCRETE ^ 5.1 FT. EAST OF LOT LINE I SURFACE 59.0 \ \ \ 963.4X / X 962.7 I / (APPROX.)Q 1 o i 961\3960.9 �I a' = \ 962.4 Il CHAINLINK -y= 962.5 X 961.8 \� / 961.2 ° ° } co W o\ \ \\ FENCE +\- / co Q) ON LOT LINE. < \ / p1 \ oX 960.5 960.9• I \O I '/ �O X 956.6 SANITARY MANHOLE CATCH BASIN HYDRANT GATE VALVE WATER SHUTOFF 0 - CHAIN LINK FENCE ❑ WOOD FENCE DECIDUOUS TREE CONIFEROUS TREE SHRUB INDEX CONTOUR - - - INTERMEDIATE CONTOUR SPOT ELEVATION CUL VERT TELEPHONE RISER POWER BOX SIGN BI TUMINOUS SURFACE L� Lr °°?00 700170 �°�°0o°°°°° o LANDSCAPED AREA X 961.8 X 961.5 / J X 960.9 F X 962.6 v \ / 1 I TILLED GARDEN -o I I L-- -J \ K 960.8 / / \961, , ' I1X 958.7 ° ° ° ° CONCRETE SURFACE / 1 o � o 1 961.4 X X 961.3 9611.4 962.5 X 962.5 \ CONCRETE-- o \ 1 \ SURFACE (APPROX.) / 1X 959.9 \ X 961.0 \ 961.3 a o X 962.7 \ \ -y -+\- CHAINLINK -y X 962.3 BROKEN \ o % FENCE + \- CONCRETE-- X 962.3 X961.3 5.� \ X 960.7 0.5 FT. WEST PIECE OF LOT LINE. \- `J \ 961.5 0 \ X 961.7 X962.4 1 r- 962.5 -MOW I � CONCRETE-. I ',---�.�\ �\ 11 LINE 1 962.6X 962 9 SURFACE \ (APPROX.) 0 �I i c) �� o �1��f�1 962.6 ;-MOW i i Q 1 -- � � LANDSCAPE \\�\���/ ��v a ra/� ),-962 .0-+ II LINE i i QO _\ 9/�'�,-EDGING/MULCH f 1V X�'6 CONCRETE �E �� _ -'�/ / Y 962.2 ._ _96 xgs g \\��`--_ 1\`> 1 O' i 5.8 FT. EAST OFLOT NK FENCE CORNER +\ EAST QUARTER CORNER OF--\ -- QUARTER CORNER OF 967'2 X- °` �\ PIECE ----- I / `� ,' A \ 9 SECTION 14, T. 121, R. 25 SECTION 14, T. 121, R. 25 l i M 0 W E� /AREA = A Rg6 - FOUND WRIGHT COUNTY MONUMENT) E �_ 0' SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER + l -963- - - Sp i -------------------- ------------- Y 962.3 p I 1/4 OF SECTION 14, T. 121, R. 25 ( I�\ (FOUND P.K. NAIL) \ UTILITY --4;, R7V��FR GARDEN I M 0 W E �b_ �' t i N 89'14'00" E 0.4 FT. WEST OF LOT CORNER ^� 1 \ N 89'14'00" E � o� EASEMENT �` + _ i yF4D_ _ X 963.4 _ _ -_ _ _I _ _ - _ 961.8 / i ---1899.53--- ---- il ---3123.56--- 964.2 �r x --- o - > ---299.81 N 89'14 00' E--- 1 962.6 �- -- ~� 11��i lam! ° X- - 9f3.7_ ° ° - 299.8 R °'� 961.3 - °° MOW -i ° °° °°oa63A- _ - - 961,_ ` X96 I ° 9. s�`�� 3s LINE -� TC 958..96 -� -(300.02 Plat) �\ SHED 2- - s -98� ---'� - - `S 89°14'00" W-\� - i X96�g61 �` X960.2 _ - r - X960" (N 89°21' 11" W Plat � -CURB 960.5 Xi 1 -TEL. \- LANDSCAPE �Go X X STOP RISER EDGING/MULCH LANDSCAPE -' GOLDEN EAGLE ROAD 4�. �- CB EDGING/ROCK °' LEV.=958.16-SOUTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL _ - & SHRUBS SAN MH x I NORTHPARK (DL NE#OF7THE3PLAT OF KLE NAS N F RMSLSO ELEV.=958.59-- 958.7 ESTATES 2ND ADDITION (DOC.# 753470) I T I - �� T I I L _ r - II r- I n I I r- A ) A �l I �- T A LT_r- ��,� I\ I n A F� r� I T I r 4_ F/ -\I I V I/-\ I I L_ X I � Ia E I I I I I Ticket Check Status Ticket Number: 170740852 As of 3/21/17 13:15 CDT, participating facility owners have responded to Ticket Check as follows: Company Name Typesy Status Time Comments TDS TELECOM - Marked 03/16/17 BRDGWT01 9:06 AM CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS - TV,FO CHACAB03 Not yet 03/15/17 responded 1:18 PM CITY OF MONTICELLO/FIBERNET E,FO,S,W Non- 03/16/17 (SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN - CMTCLO01 Excavation 11:23 AM AS -BUILT PLANS PROVIDED) CENTER POINT ENERGY G Clear/No 03/21/17 Clear gas and power. - MINGASO4 conflict 11:25 AM verified prior to any excavation by NORTHERN NATURAL Clear/No 03/16/17 list of utilities & response to ticket G GAS - NNGAS03 conflict 8:30 AM Datum) XCEL ENERGY - XCEL01 Clear/No 03/21/17 conflict 11:26 AM PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Lot 2, Block 3, OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK, according to the recorded plat thereof, Wright County, Minnesota. PARCEL ID#. 155-018-003020 SURVEYORS NOTES: 1. Matters of record are shown according to Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company Commitment for Title Insurance issued by Preferred Title, Inc., Order Number: 6321428, Reference Number: 04001-17, Effective Date April 04, 2017. 2. Gross land area=4.40 acres 3. Underground utilities are shown according to ground markings per Gopher State One Call Ticket Number 170740852 (non -excavation request). Meyer-Rohlin Land Services is not responsible for utilities that were not marked on the ground. Location of underground utilities must be verified prior to any excavation by contacting Gopher State One Call @ 651-454-0002 or gopherstateonecall.org. See "Ticket Check Status" on this drawing for list of utilities & response to ticket provided by Gopher State One Call. 4. Project Benchmark: Mn/Dot Geodetic Monument "8605 S" Elev. 966.55 (NAVD88 Datum) 5. Bearing orientation is based Wright County Coordinate System, NAD 83 Datum (86 Adjustment). 6. Rights of Way, easements, and servitudes listed in Schedule B, Section 2 of the Commitment for Title Insurance (refer to Note #1): Exception 9. - Utility easements as shown on the recorded plat of Oakwood Industrial Park are indicated on this drawing. 7. According to the property description of the plat of Oakwood Industrial Park, the south line of the plat is the south line of the Northeast Quarter of Section 14. However, the south line of Oakwood Industrial Park is monumented southerly of the south line of the Northeast Quarter, as indicated on this drawing. We recommend that the property owner contact a real estate attorney regarding possible property rights to the strip lying between the monumented plat boundary and the south line of the Northeast Quarter of Section 14. 0 40 80 120 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET O DENOTES IRON MONUMENT SET • DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND 0 DENOTES CAST-IRON MONUMENT FOUND A DENOTES P.K. NAIL FOUND REVISED 06114117 (SOUTH BOUNDARY LINE) To Kenneth J. Spaeth and Theresa L. Spaeth, and Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company. This is to certify that this map or plat and the survey on which it is based were made in accordance with the 2016 Minimum Standard Detail Requirements for ALTA/NSPS Land Title Surveys, jointly established and adopted by ALTA and NSPS, and includes items 1, 4, 5, 8, 11 of Table A thereof. The fieldwork was completed between March 22 and April 5, 2017. Date: April 18, 2017 Abram A. Niemela License No.` 48664 li •IIIIIIIII 1111111 II Illi Ul;;\iw L' . iwl 111` REVISIONS 06ZI4/17 AW '''-11 LANA SERVICES 708 1 ST AVENUE NE, #' 1 BUFFALO, MN 55313 GATE 0411 8I 17 PH. 763.682.1781 WWW.MEYERROHLIN.GOM DRAWN BY BOOK 387 SHEET 1 OF FILE NO. AAN PAGE 40 1 SHEETS 17168 1 I I 1 I I I I 1 I I I I 1 0 00 DUNDAS ROAD I 1 I I I I . I I I _ I I 10" D.I.P. 1 LO � 15" R.C.P. SAN I . � � SAN MH EAIll lied 4 n fi�¢iy,titi! o (2)I VIM ELLV. =9 C RIM E I � ;Wv. LLLV.=9 INV. ELEV.=943.7 -- »` ,►- », T I�T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T r—rr N i -TEL. RISER 1 , R T■ i I �—UTILITY EASEMENTo vi 10 -- o Ld .I -1N \ ' "ii I -------- �___--------� --------- -- i---=----` -�__ ------ � \-----------••---- ----------------------- -- ----------- - r--------- �—T-7-----------------� m � ' 'I i •' i a I it � C/) 109 109if II II � I I I; BUILDING A BUILDING B O MOW LINE MOW LINE I "' iNE + II ;1 I Q • -5N 11-07 LINE 109 109 ,II I a -- ---- ---- _ -------- �I I_ — - ------------ ------------------ '�'— ---- --------- ---= _ ----—I III i ��___- -----• •--------- - it � - /�_' ____-� / I 1 I I I EXISTING I I I HYDRANT — — — — — I I ' I I I ' I ' 1 ' I ' I - I I , I , ' - I I I 1 I o S "n 0 SAN MH RIM ELEV.=961.96 INV. ELEV.=943.7 I it T N• I rl■ l■/ I -T- R=100 R=200 --------- R= 300 R=300 R=200 I I ' � ;I W II I � ; 1 I I I RO' D DUNDA S , ;10" D.I,P. t� I 15" R.C.P. I Q I 63 , II 11 1 i TT--r�T T T T T T T __ T / I T TT�—N �� T T , T T T T T _''-UTILITY EASEMENT \\ An -_=_- a � D_o_o_o n I OF FENCE + \– I 0.5 FT. WEST III OF LOT LINE. me ISI 1� SII I I 'I II L1 `11 PROPOSED HYDRANT CHAINL K FENCE CORNER + \– '��'�' 0.4 FT. WEST OF LOT CORNER kLITY- N 89 °14'00 E EASEMENT ' ------ 3123.56-- -------------1�- i-------------------- ---�� . ---- ----- 99.81 — — — — — — — — — — -------f---------------- MOW G f• 0°0�0°°o°d°°� � I � LINE --' Or ' d°°o0°0°s- ���, m Sed\ — ---_ LANDSCAPE—,GOLDEN EAGLE ROAD EDGING/ROCK & SHRUBS F-- — — — — —I— — — — —-- I I I I SAN MH ELEV. = 958 r-- — — — — —I-- I I I I A ,h rt— r --IA 6000000- ° 1, a SAN MH RIM ELEV=960.04 INV. ELEV.=942.8 EXISTING HYDRANT R=100 I 1 I -MOW , j LINE -------------- --------------------- --- I I I 1 I 1 I w R= 300 I I � Q W C I U W •y � N _ OLn 0 30 60 90 I GRAPHIC SCALE /N FEET SURVEY DATA SURVEY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY: MEYER ROHLIN LAND SERVICES 708 1st AVENUE NE BUFFALO, MN 55313 DATED: APRIL 18, 2017 BENCHMARK: MN/DOT GEODETIC MONUMENT "8605 S" ELEVATION = 966.55 NAVD88 DATUM PROJECT LOCATION PART OF THE SW4 AND NE4, SECTION 14 TOWNSHIP 121, RANGE 25, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA. EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 2, BLOCK 3, OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA. CE O u C � U W •y � N _ OLn o a.c ti I V) (o N C vii Oi W 4_, i— �, 2� E o o 2— � 1): C� U X j �o q O c� a� W [rT U •� C -0 CL _V oc: ' Q CL I W 4� — o Q) W CE O u \ q LANDSCAPE z o ---EDGING/MULCH CHAINLI NCE CORNER + \– cz i EAS OF LOT LINE -- SOUTFa ! '" T' 'r 'IORTHEAST 1/4 0— R=300 -.121, R. 25 V) I � 1 ----------t-------- I N 89°14'00" E o � a -------__ _- ------ + ------1899.53 ------ _ � � m m ^` 0000—_— — — —/ — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — O m Q Lw o o a Y 66' I, Q cj W I Q o v TEL LANDSCAPE I RI R EDGING/MULCH FILE N0. 00633 --_SOUTH LIN OF THE PLAT OF OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK (DO .# 275353) AS MONUMENTED; ALSO NORTH LI E OF THE PLAT OF KLEIN FARMS ESTATES 2ND ADDITION (DOC.# 753470) I I I I I i I I I I I n l n I- hI I S I Fire Hydra t Coverage Plan •y V L o a.c ti I V) (o N C vii Oi W C'-- 44 1, �, 2� E o o 2— 613p� 1): C� U X q) y q I N Imo y O y W [rT U •� C -0 ' Q CL I W Q ZZ ) I -Z co � �q) �( ��. N Q� p Oy O G� 3 p 0: cj_ \ q LANDSCAPE z o ---EDGING/MULCH CHAINLI NCE CORNER + \– cz i EAS OF LOT LINE -- SOUTFa ! '" T' 'r 'IORTHEAST 1/4 0— R=300 -.121, R. 25 V) I � 1 ----------t-------- I N 89°14'00" E o � a -------__ _- ------ + ------1899.53 ------ _ � � m m ^` 0000—_— — — —/ — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — O m Q Lw o o a Y 66' I, Q cj W I Q o v TEL LANDSCAPE I RI R EDGING/MULCH FILE N0. 00633 --_SOUTH LIN OF THE PLAT OF OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK (DO .# 275353) AS MONUMENTED; ALSO NORTH LI E OF THE PLAT OF KLEIN FARMS ESTATES 2ND ADDITION (DOC.# 753470) I I I I I i I I I I I n l n I- hI I S I Fire Hydra t Coverage Plan PAVEMENT MARKING DIRECTIONAL ARROW; -- WHITE LATEX PAINT (TYI CAL) I j I I II DO NOT EXIT SIGN it ■ PAVEMENT MARKING DIRECTIONAL ARROW; WHITE LATEX PAINT (TYI CAL) DIRECTIONAL SIGN "ONE WAY" WITH LEFT ARROW DIRECTIONAL SIGN "ONE WAY" WITH LEFT ARROW PAVEMENT MARKING DIRECTIONAL ARROW; WHITE LATEX PAINT (TYI CAL) �41 DIRECTIONAL SIGN I "ONE WAY" WITH LEFT ARROW I PAVEMENT MARKING DIRECTIONAL ARROW; WHITE LATEX PAINT (TYI CAL) u DUNDAS v su-u'o--o--o o-"c�o"o"c o o�c�o"o�o�o�o�0000�o�o oao°o°o°o05oc'a ,0000ooa 1600000°o00iolo000°Qo,i k rl-- T n — — — — — — — — — — — 4 — — ROAD DO NOT ENTER SIGN 0 %TOP PAVEMENT MARKING DIRECTIONAL ARROWS; WHITE LATEX PAINT (TYI CAL) DO NOT ENTER SIGN - STOP SIGN PAVEMENT MARKING; 24" LETTERS; 24" WIDE SOLID STRIPE; WHITE LATEX PAINT PAVEMENT MARKING DIRECTIONAL ARROW; WHITE LATEX PAINT (TYI CAL) DIRECTIONAL SIGN "ONE WAY" WITH LEFT ARROW DIRECTIONAL SIGN "ONE WAY" WITH LEFT ARROW PAVEMENT MARKING DIRECTIONAL ARROW; WHITE LATEX PAINT (TYI CAL) DIRECTIONAL SIGN "ONE WAY" WITH LEFT ARROW PAVEMENT MARKING DIRECTIONAL ARROW, WHITE LATEX PAINT (TYI CAL) A I'do ------ — — — — -------- �°°°°°°° p000 00000° i r— rel i --- i 0 30 60 90 I GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET SURVEY DATA SURVEY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY: MEYER ROHLIN LAND SERVICES 708 1st AVENUE NE BUFFALO, MN 55313 DATED: APRIL 18, 2017 BENCHMARK: MN/DOT GEODETIC MONUMENT "8605 S" ELEVATION = 966.55 NAVD88 DATUM PROJECT LOCATION PART OF THE SW4 AND NE4, SECTION 14 TOWNSHIP 121, RANGE 25, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA. EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 2, BLOCK 3, OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA. met � O two co o c c Q.W � m m o O I N %Nam N No co a LZ Q. o W) ,cu tufttwo C co W V •p z No z cs 11i 44 w o c: >W O � p m � oC ao � •— , O o 3 waft 00 4Ci J O r cu 1 LW v, N a � O o c c � m m o m I p C N � Q 1 NM (o N a LZ W C� 10 �0 1 CO Ln 10 3 C cn 0���� V •p s W (.5A I x N I �j O 'I) 44 100 N 41Z�� ti � tij 0 3 lW��ai3 n , O o 3 00 4Ci J O r 1 an O (YI q 3 4� o ti - � O � m m o m o a Q � � Q v V FILE NO. 00633 1 /1 Pavement Markinq Plan 449 I 0 00 SAN MH I RIM ELEV.=961.96 INV. ELEV.=943.7 CHAINLINK ---� FENCE + \— ON LOT LINE. CHAINLINK --� FENCE + \- 0.5 FT. WEST OF LOT LINE. CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER +\- 0.4 FT. WEST OF LOT CORNER N 89 °14'00" E ------ 3123.56---------------- - DUNDAS ROAD 1 Q 4 I W _ 155 - -1 1 Max 10' Vert a Q ' .SS.S ' 4 "- 2 w 0 55.000ft Overall WiN 8.500ft Overall Body Heiqht 12.052ft Min Body Ground Clearance 1.334ft Max Track Width 8.500ft ` 6.00s 0-0-0 17,90° 0 ----; -- 0 In � LC SCO d U 0 0 --5.1 +\- 0 0 0 I kLI TY---..; - - -- -- --- ;--. --- -- -- -- --- -- EASEMENT - - , -------- ice- ----------------------- i --------------------t-------- ----- 99.81 N °14'00" E -- _�U CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER + \- 5.1 FT. EAST OF LOT LINE LANDSCAPE --EDGING/MULCH -- CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER + \- 5.8 FT. EAST OF LOT LINE Ir o a_ ,---SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 14, T. 121, R. 25 N 89°14'00" E 1899.53 G �F� MOW ; f"Ooo °°°d°a°o i Vow 0LINE - D'�s'-��`O�O�g��'�� © -- SHED 1 ,a0_0� ' 13�6 6 ' --CURB STOP '--TEL. LANDSCAPE RISER EDGING/MULCH LANDSCAPE- GOLDEN EAGLE ROAD �----CB � It EDGING/ROCK ELEV.=958.16 _ _ �'�--_SOUTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL SHRUBS SAN MH i PARK (DOC.# 275353) AS MONUMENTED; ALSO ELEV.=958.59 NORTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF KLEIN FARMS �� I ESTATES 2ND ADDITION (DOC.# 753470) r— n n n ,h rt— n l r— IA r--,\ rte► I I 0 30 60 90 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET SURVEY DATA SURVEY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY: MEYER ROHLIN LAND SERVICES 708 1st AVENUE NE BUFFALO, MN 55313 DATED: APRIL 18, 2017 BENCHMARK: MN/DOT GEODETIC MONUMENT "8605 S" ELEVATION = 966.55 NAVD88 DATUM PROJECT LOCATION PART OF THE SW4 AND NE4, SECTION 14 TOWNSHIP 121, RANGE 25, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA. EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 2, BLOCK 3, OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA. .5 14 Aq F 49 z 0 � w � W ct �1 0 ct O U ct WOC/� ct IIU W N _ O _Tj� 0 cl� °� cl� z CL W C: o ~� O ° ca v CL00 U .v _ C: -,-— ° � W � 09 a 4 I I IIMax 56' Horiz _ 155 - -1 1 Max 10' Vert a S ' 10.4 4.R ' ' .SS.S ' 4 "- 2 WB -50 - Intermediate Semi -Trailer Overall Len th 55.000ft Overall WiN 8.500ft Overall Body Heiqht 12.052ft Min Body Ground Clearance 1.334ft Max Track Width 8.500ft Lock -to -lock time 6.00s Max Steering Angle (Virtual) 17,90° z 0 � w � W ct �1 0 ct O U ct WOC/� ct IIU W N _ O _Tj� 0 cl� °� cl� z CL W C: o ~� O ° ca v CL00 U .v _ C: -,-— ° � W � 09 a a Cn 4.o j L •y rA V I ` m m p Q C m 0 I N 'Lo) v0 Q W In � LC SCO d U V � O L(0C: i� 0 o X I N a A I m O 4�� Iwa�N3 �ti y � w J'0 r. t i 13 I� •C�' j p Chi p O q 3 4� o ti FILE N0. 00633 -1 /_1 WB50 Truck Circulation Plan Cn o � m m m Q Q Q � v 0 o a FILE N0. 00633 -1 /_1 WB50 Truck Circulation Plan Spaeth Industrial Park Site Improvement Project 108 Dundas Road Monticello, MN DRAINAGE ANALYSIS Prepared for: Ken Spaeth 108 Meadowlake Road SE St. Michael, MN 55376 Phone: (612) 889-3100 spaethmasonry@gmail.com Prepared bv: Civil Engineering Site Design Attn: Scott Dahlke PO Box 566 118 East Broadway Street Monticello, MN 55362 Phone: (763) 314-0929 sdahlke@civilesd.com May 08, 2017 July 03, 2017 revised CESD Project # 00633 TABLE OF CONTENTS Narrative o Proposed Project o Site Location o Requirements o Rate Calculations o Existing Site Conditions o Proposed Site Conditions o Volume Abstraction and Water Quality Calculations o Soils Data o Summary o Certification Appendix A — Existing Conditions Drainage Calculations o Existing Conditions Drainage Area Map o 2 -Year (2.81 -Inch), 24 -Hour Event o 10 -Year (4.18 -Inch), 24 -Hour Event o 100 -Year (6.93 -Inch), 24 -Hour Event Appendix B Proposed Condition Drainage Calculations o Proposed Conditions Drainage Area Map o 2 -Year (2.81 -Inch), 24 -Hour Event o 10 -Year (4.18 -Inch), 24 -Hour Event o 100 -Year (6.93 -Inch), 24 -Hour Event Appendix C Volume Abstraction 1.0" Rainfall on New Impervious Surface o Infiltration Worksheet o Stage -Storage Containment Volume Appendix D — Soils Data o Soils Data per Web Soil Survey Spaeth Industrial Park, Monticello, MN Drainage Analysis Page 2 NARRATIVE PROPOSED PROJECT: The project proposes site improvements for multiple small industrial buildings. Site improvements include new buildings, pavement, utilities, and associated items. The project proposes collection of impervious surface drainage with storm sewer configured to function as an underground infiltration system with overflow storm water routed to existing roadside ditch of Dundas Road. SITE LOCATION: The site address is 108 Dundas Road in the City of Monticello, MN. The project is in the SW 1/4 of the NE1/4, Section 14, Township 121, Range 25, Wright County, MN. Access to the site can be achieved from Dundas Road along the north boundary. REQUIREMENTS: Stormwater management design for the project is subject to review by the Monticello. Stormwater requirements for the project as received from City staff are as follows: Stormwater management for the site must provide volume control (i.e. infiltration) and meet water quality requirement per the City's stormwater checklist. RATE CALCULATIONS: The storm water runoff and calculations of this report are based on Nationwide Urban Runoff Program (NURP) and the Soil Conservation Service Synthetic Unit Hydrograph Method incorporated into the software program HydroCad 10.0. Rainfall precipitation depths used in calculations are current NOAA Atlas 14 Point Precipitation Frequency Estimates for Monticello, Minnesota for the 2 -Year (2.81 -inch), 10 -Year (4.18 -inch) and 100 -Year (6.93 -inch) rainfall events. EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS: The existing site is vacant property that has been designated as industrial development property. Most of the existing site has grass turf coverage. Small areas of concrete pavement exist at various locations at the site remaining from previous industrial site activity. Existing storm water runoff for the site is primarily directed by natural topography to adjacent property to the east, small areas of runoff drains north to Dundas Road ditch, and a small area drains south to adjacent property. Existing Conditions Drainage Area Map and associated HydroCAD Analysis calculation model printouts can be found in attached Appendix A. The flow rates from the existing site are summarized in the table below: Spaeth Industrial Park, Monticello, MN Drainage Analysis Page 3 EXISTING FLOW RATES DISCHARGING OFFSITE 2 -Year (2.81") Runoff 10 -Year (4.18") 100 -Year (6.93") Rate (cfs) Runoff Rate (cfs) Runoff Rate (cfs) NORTH 0.00 0.00 0.23 EAST 0.03 0.68 6.53 SOUTH 0.00 0.00 0.07 TOTAL EXISTING 0.03 0.61 6.59 CONDITION PROPOSED SITE CONDITIONS: The site is proposed to be improved with multiple buildings, pavement, utilities, and associated site improvements. Storm water improvements for the project are needed provide volume control for water quality requirements. Rate control is provided by City regional pond located north of Chelsea Road and west of Fallon Avenue. The project proposes collection of impervious surface drainage with storm sewer configured to function as an underground infiltration system. A surface infiltration basin is provided at the south end of the development and is connected to the storm sewer system. The infiltration basin provides additional storm water storage volume and additional system infiltration capacity. Storm water overflow is routed to Dundas Road ditch at the north east corner of the site. Proposed Conditions Drainage Area Map and associated HydroCAD Analysis calculation model printouts can be found in attached Appendix B. The flow rates from the proposed site are summarized in the table below: PROPOSED FLOW RATES DISCHARGING OFFSITE 2 -Year (2.81 ") 10 -Year (4.18") 100 -Year (6.93") Runoff Rate (cfs) Runoff Rate (cfs) Runoff Rate (cfs) NORTH (DIRECT) 0.04 0.12 0.32 NORTH (DRAINAGE 1.04 5.07 14.55 SYSTEM DISHARGE) EAST 0.00 0.00 0.06 SOUTH 0.00 0.00 0.03 Total Proposed 0.04 0.12 4.03 Conditions Spaeth Industrial Park, Monticello, MN Drainage Analysis Page 4 VOLUME ABSTRACTION AND WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS: Volume abstraction is required to be provided for 1.1" rainfall on new impervious surface. Storm water system improvements are to incorporate infiltration ability with volume and capacity necessary to satisfy this requirement. The proposed site impervious surface is 150,032 sf. The project proposes collection of storm water runoff into catch basins and storm sewer with routing to either an on site infiltration basin, or an onsite underground system with perforated pipe and an outlet control structure with an elevated discharge outlet pipe. The elevated discharge outlet pipe provides containment of storm water volume within the system and allows infiltration of storm water into natural granular soils at the site. Pretreatment of storm water runoff within the system is provided by sumps incorporated into catch basins that collect runoff into the system. Infiltration Worksheet and Stage -Storage containment volume data printouts can be found in Attached Appendix C. The following table summarizes the calculation of required and proposed infiltration volumes: VOLUME ABSTRACTION 1.1" INFILTRATION Item New Impervious 1.1" Runoff 48 hr System Storage Surface Area Volume Infiltration Volume Below (sf) Required Volume Outlet (cf) Capacity (cf) (cf) Infiltration 150,032 13,753 28,211 23,720 Basin and Underground Infiltration System Since abstraction of 1.1" rainfall on new impervious surface is achieved, City of Monticello standards for water quality are also achieved. SOILS DATA: Geotechnical analysis has been completed at the site with completion of 6 soil borings and 1 double -ring infiltrometer test. Soils at the site have been found to be uniform and have been classified as SP type soils by Geotechnial Engineer. Infiltrometer test was completed in the location of the proposed infiltration basin at elevation 957. Infiltrometer test result is 54.01 inches/hour. Due to high infiltration rate, infiltration basin is proposed to be constructed with 1.0 foot of amended soils in bottom of basin consisting of 70%- 80% sand and 10%-30% compost MNDOT Grade 2. Spaeth Industrial Park, Monticello, MN Drainage Analysis Page 5 Based on geotechnical analysis, soils in the project area are understood to be hydrologic Group A. Type A soils at the site allow for an infiltration rate of 0.8 in/hr allowed by the MPCA Minnesota Storm Water Manual. Soils data for the site as obtained to date can be found in attached Appendix D. SUMMARY: The calculations show that the proposed design provides reduced stormwater runoff flow rates, achieves required volume control, and required water quality control for the proposed condition. The project improvements and drainage analysis satisfy the City of Monticello requirements for storm water management. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Scott Dahlke, P.E. Reg. No. 24348 Spaeth Industrial Park, Monticello, MN Drainage Analysis 07/03/2017 Date Page 6 APPENDIX A Existing Conditions Drainage Calculations Spaeth Industrial Park, Monticello, MN Drainage Analysis (S3) Ex Cond Onsite Ex Cond Onsite Draining East S2 Ex Cond Offsite Draining East to Area S1 North Ex Cond Onsite Draining South Ital Project SubCat Reach on Link Routing Diagram for 00633 Ex Cond Prepared by Hewlett-Packard, Printed 4/18/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 01607 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Spaeth Industrial Park, Monticello, MN 00633 Ex Cond MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81 " Prepared by Hewlett-Packard Printed 4/18/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 01607 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 2 Summary for Subcatchment S1: Ex Cond Onsite Draining East Runoff = 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0 cf, Depth= 0.00" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81" Area (sf) CN Description 2,822 98 Impervious, HSG A 174,456 39 Pervious, HSG A 177,278 40 Weighted Average 174,456 98.41 % Pervious Area 2,822 1.59% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 20.0 Direct Entry, User Defined Summary for Subcatchment S2: Ex Cond Offsite Draining East to Area S1 Runoff = 0.03 cfs @ 13.36 hrs, Volume= 576 cf, Depth= 0.06" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81" Area (sf) CN Description 20,886 98 Impervious, HSG A 93,042 39 Pervious, HSG A 113,928 50 Weighted Average 93,042 81.67% Pervious Area 20,886 18.33% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 20.0 Direct Entry, User Defined Summary for Subcatchment S3: Ex Cond Onsite Draining North Runoff = 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0 cf, Depth= 0.00" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81" Area (sf) CN Description 0 98 Impervious, HSG A 11,215 39 Pervious, HSG A 11,215 39 Weighted Average 11,215 100.00% Pervious Area Spaeth Industrial Park, Monticello, MN 00633 Ex Cond MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81 " Prepared by Hewlett-Packard Printed 4/18/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 01607 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 3 Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, User Defined Summary for Subcatchment S4: Ex Cond Onsite Draining South Runoff = 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0 cf, Depth= 0.00" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81" Area (sf) CN Description 0 98 Impervious, HSG A 3,336 39 Pervious, HSG A 3,336 39 Weighted Average 3,336 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, User Defined Summary for Reach 1 R: Total Project Inflow Area = 305,757 sf, 7.75% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.02" for 2 -Year event Inflow = 0.03 cfs @ 13.36 hrs, Volume= 576 cf Outflow = 0.03 cfs @ 13.36 hrs, Volume= 576 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Spaeth Industrial Park, Monticello, MN 00633 Ex Cond MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" Prepared by Hewlett-Packard Printed 4/18/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 01607 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 4 Summary for Subcatchment S1: Ex Cond Onsite Draining East Runoff = 0.07 cfs @ 13.38 hrs, Volume= 1,271 cf, Depth= 0.09" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" Area (sf) CN Description 2,822 98 Impervious, HSG A 174,456 39 Pervious, HSG A 177,278 40 Weighted Average 174,456 98.41 % Pervious Area 2,822 1.59% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 20.0 Direct Entry, User Defined Summary for Subcatchment S2: Ex Cond Offsite Draining East to Area S1 Runoff = 0.61 cfs @ 12.43 hrs, Volume= 3,704 cf, Depth= 0.39" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" Area (sf) CN Description 20,886 98 Impervious, HSG A 93,042 39 Pervious, HSG A 113,928 50 Weighted Average 93,042 81.67% Pervious Area 20,886 18.33% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 20.0 Direct Entry, User Defined Summary for Subcatchment S3: Ex Cond Onsite Draining North Runoff = 0.00 cfs @ 13.26 hrs, Volume= 62 cf, Depth= 0.07" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" Area (sf) CN Description 0 98 Impervious, HSG A 11,215 39 Pervious, HSG A 11,215 39 Weighted Average 11,215 100.00% Pervious Area Spaeth Industrial Park, Monticello, MN 00633 Ex Cond MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" Prepared by Hewlett-Packard Printed 4/18/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 01607 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 5 Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, User Defined Summary for Subcatchment S4: Ex Cond Onsite Draining South Runoff = 0.00 cfs @ 13.26 hrs, Volume= 18 cf, Depth= 0.07" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" Area (sf) CN Description 0 98 Impervious, HSG A 3,336 39 Pervious, HSG A 3,336 39 Weighted Average 3,336 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, User Defined Summary for Reach 1 R: Total Project Inflow Area = 305,757 sf, 7.75% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.20" for 10 -Year event Inflow = 0.61 cfs @ 12.43 hrs, Volume= 5,056 cf Outflow = 0.61 cfs @ 12.43 hrs, Volume= 5,056 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Spaeth Industrial Park, Monticello, MN 00633 Ex Cond MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Prepared by Hewlett-Packard Printed 4/18/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 01607 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 6 Summary for Subcatchment S1: Ex Cond Onsite Draining East Runoff = 2.34 cfs @ 12.39 hrs, Volume= 12,053 cf, Depth= 0.82" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Area (sf) CN Description 2,822 98 Impervious, HSG A 174,456 39 Pervious, HSG A 177,278 40 Weighted Average 174,456 98.41 % Pervious Area 2,822 1.59% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 20.0 Direct Entry, User Defined Summary for Subcatchment S2: Ex Cond Offsite Draining East to Area S1 Runoff = 4.19 cfs @ 12.33 hrs, Volume= 15,456 cf, Depth= 1.63" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Area (sf) CN Description 20,886 98 Impervious, HSG A 93,042 39 Pervious, HSG A 113,928 50 Weighted Average 93,042 81.67% Pervious Area 20,886 18.33% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 20.0 Direct Entry, User Defined Summary for Subcatchment S3: Ex Cond Onsite Draining North Runoff = 0.23 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 695 cf, Depth= 0.74" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Area (sf) CN Description 0 98 Impervious, HSG A 11,215 39 Pervious, HSG A 11,215 39 Weighted Average 11,215 100.00% Pervious Area Spaeth Industrial Park, Monticello, MN 00633 Ex Cond MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Prepared by Hewlett-Packard Printed 4/18/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 01607 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 7 Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, User Defined Summary for Subcatchment S4: Ex Cond Onsite Draining South Runoff = 0.07 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 207 cf, Depth= 0.74" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Area (sf) CN Description 0 98 Impervious, HSG A 3,336 39 Pervious, HSG A 3,336 39 Weighted Average 3,336 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, User Defined Summary for Reach 1 R: Total Project Inflow Area = 305,757 sf, 7.75% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.12" for 100 -Year event Inflow = 6.59 cfs @ 12.35 hrs, Volume= 28,410 cf Outflow = 6.59 cfs @ 12.35 hrs, Volume= 28,410 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs APPENDIX B Proposed Conditions Drainage Calculations Spaeth Industrial Park, Monticello, MN Drainage Analysis : ,► Ii - ♦ 1 1 r'iF �dol ' jr �� ••� ►PAA II' I►ff�' 1 S lu o ►,¢�g/IIIvqPON Alolo FIR WA U '" / a>/��'o%%rCel�/r.k�/II� ' . ly��,�I I � ���3�• f/ glll �I I i. �//�/}��i' I� 'I��.I' ���34, r♦:*'��11 lobi �/ .� � � �`/YI71�v°s �I► _ 1 11 Y4 II 52 �a?aaiaiaa®a®�, aaea•� I♦aaa MMMA, aaaa. •.a.���a�.. � //��►aaaaaaaaaaaaaa ��% ♦aaaaaaaaaaaaaa ♦aaaaaaaaaaaaa� �/ �`�a�•�aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa� +.aaaaaaaaaaaaa ���aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaae, ��aaaaaaaaaaaaaa� ♦aaaaaaaaaa♦aaa ,�♦aaaaaaaaaaaaa� iaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ' �iaiaiaaaaaaaaaaaaaa�aiai! �aiaiaiaiaaaaaa�ii�iaiaia� - - - �aaaaaaaaaaaaa'�►aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa,� . �iaiaiaiaiaiai�►aiaiaiaiaiaiaiai! aiai�►aiaiaiaiaiaiaia� . ���a�a�a�a�a�aaaa���,• , L S2a Ex Cond Offsite Draining East to Area S1 S3 Pro Cond nsite Draining rth S1 � GS Pro Cond Onsite to UGS Under G and System Pro Cond Onsite to System S2b Infiltration Basin ,ZZ Ex Cond Offsite Draining East to Area S6 :af�O'roject Pro Cond Onsite Draining South Pro Cond Onsite Draining East Subcat Reach on Link Routing Diagram for 00633 Pro Cond Prepared by CESD HydroCADO 10.00-18 s/n 01607 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Spaeth Ind Park, Monticello, MN 00633 Pro Cond MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81 " Prepared by CESD HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 01607 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 2 Summary for Subcatchment S1: Pro Cond Onsite to UGS Runoff = 6.93 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 16,606 cf, Depth= 1.98" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81" Area (sf) CN Description 90,193 98 Impervious, HSG A 10,336 39 Pervious, >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 100,529 92 Weighted Average 10,336 10.28% Pervious Area 90,193 89.72% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, User Defined Summary for Subcatchment S2a: Ex Cond Offsite Draining East to Area S1 Runoff = 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0 cf, Depth= 0.00" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81" Area (sf) CN Description 0 98 Impervious, HSG A 3,612 39 Pervious, HSG A 3,612 39 Weighted Average 3,612 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, User Defined Summary for Subcatchment S2b: Ex Cond Offsite Draining East to Area S6 Runoff = 0.03 cfs @ 13.36 hrs, Volume= 558 cf, Depth= 0.06" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81" Area (sf) CN Description 20,886 98 Impervious, HSG A 89,430 39 Pervious, HSG A 110,316 50 Weighted Average 89,430 81.07% Pervious Area 20,886 18.93% Impervious Area Spaeth Ind Park, Monticello, MN 00633 Pro Cond MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81 " Prepared by CESD HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 01607 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 3 Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 20.0 Direct Entry, User Defined Summary for Subcatchment S3: Pro Cond Onsite Draining North Runoff = 0.04 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 86 cf, Depth= 0.46" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81" Area (sf) CN Description 1,052 98 Impervious, HSG A 1,213 39 Pervious, >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 2,265 66 Weighted Average 1,213 53.55% Pervious Area 1,052 46.45% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, User Defined Summary for Subcatchment S4: Pro Cond Onsite Draining South Runoff = 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0 cf, Depth= 0.00" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81" Area (sf) CN Description 0 98 Impervious, HSG A 1,517 39 Pervious, >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 1,517 39 Weighted Average 1,517 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, User Defined Summary for Subcatchment S5: Pro Cond Onsite Draining East Runoff = 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0 cf, Depth= 0.00" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81" Spaeth Ind Park, Monticello, MN 00633 Pro Cond MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81 " Prepared by CESD HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 01607 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 4 Area (sf) CN Description 0 98 Impervious, HSG A 2,942 39 Pervious, >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 2,942 39 Weighted Average 2,942 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, User Defined Summary for Subcatchment S6: Pro Cond Onsite to System Runoff = 2.50 cfs @ 12.31 hrs, Volume= 8,228 cf, Depth= 1.17" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81" Area (sf) CN Description 58,779 98 Impervious, HSG A 19,242 39 Pervious, >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 6,422 49 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG A 84,443 81 Weighted Average 25,664 30.39% Pervious Area 58,779 69.61 % Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 20.0 Direct Entry, User Defined Summary for Reach 1 R: Total Project Inflow Area = 305,624 sf, 55.92% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.19" for 2 -Year event Inflow = 1.04 cfs @ 12.58 hrs, Volume= 4,924 cf Outflow = 1.04 cfs @ 12.58 hrs, Volume= 4,924 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Summary for Pond IB: Infiltration Basin Inflow Area = 194,759 sf, 40.90% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.54" for 2 -Year event Inflow = 2.50 cfs @ 12.31 hrs, Volume= 8,786 cf Outflow = 0.12 cfs @ 15.30 hrs, Volume= 8,787 cf, Atten= 95%, Lag= 180.0 min Discarded = 0.12 cfs @ 15.30 hrs, Volume= 8,787 cf Primary = 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0 cf Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 956.97' @ 15.30 hrs Surf.Area= 6,371 sf Storage= 5,411 cf Plug -Flow detention time= (not calculated: outflow precedes inflow) Spaeth Ind Park, Monticello, MN 00633 Pro Cond MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81 " Prepared by CESD HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 01607 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 5 Center -of -Mass det. time= 503.5 min ( 1,344.5 - 841.0 ) Summary for Pond UGS: Under Ground System Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description Inflow Depth = 0.67" for 2 -Year event #1 956.00' 44,682 cf Infiltration Basin (Conic)Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store Wet.Area (feet) (sq -ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) (sq -ft) 956.00 4,819 0 0 4,819 957.00 6,422 5,601 5,601 6,444 958.00 8,142 7,265 12,866 8,190 959.00 9,133 8,633 21,499 9,234 960.00 11,796 10,436 31,935 11,922 961.00 13,722 12,747 44,682 13,889 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Discarded 956.00' 0.800 in/hr Exfiltration over Horizontal area #2 Primary 958.50' 18.0" Round Pipe Outlet L= 17.0' RCP, end -section conforming to fill, Ke= 0.500 Inlet/ Outlet Invert= 958.50'/ 958.50' S=0.0000? Cc= 0.900 n=0.012 Concrete pipe, finished, Flow Area= 1.77 sf Discarded OutFlow Max=0.12 cfs @ 15.30 hrs HW=956.97' (Free Discharge) L1=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.12 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs HW=956.00' TW=955.50' (Dynamic Tailwater) L2=Pipe Outlet ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 958.59' @ 12.59 hrs Surf.Area= 7,602 sf Storage= 8,948 cf Plug -Flow detention time= (not calculated: outflow precedes inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 432.4 min ( 1,222.0 - 789.7 ) Volume Summary for Pond UGS: Under Ground System Inflow Area = 298,900 sf, 56.83% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.67" for 2 -Year event Inflow = 6.93 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 16,606 cf Outflow = 1.18 cfs @ 12.59 hrs, Volume= 16,607 cf, Atten= 83%, Lag= 24.7 min Discarded = 0.14 cfs @ 12.59 hrs, Volume= 11,769 cf Primary = 1.04 cfs @ 12.59 hrs, Volume= 4,838 cf Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 958.59' @ 12.59 hrs Surf.Area= 7,602 sf Storage= 8,948 cf Plug -Flow detention time= (not calculated: outflow precedes inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 432.4 min ( 1,222.0 - 789.7 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 955.50' 8,514 cf 7.00'W x 571.00'L x 4.00'H Rock Encasement Z=1.0 25,321 cf Overall - 4,036 cf Embedded = 21,285 cf x 40.0% Voids #2 959.50' 4,122 cf 14.50'W x 571.00'L x 1.50'H Sand over Rock Encasement Z=1.0 13,741 cf Overall x 30.0% Voids #3 956.50' 4,036 cf 36.0" Round Pipe Storage Inside #1 L= 571.0' 16,673 cf Total Available Storage Spaeth Ind Park, Monticello, MN 00633 Pro Cond MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81 " Prepared by CESD HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 01607 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 6 Device Routinq Invert Outlet Devices #1 Discarded 955.50' 0.800 in/hr Exfiltration over Horizontal area #2 Primary 958.00' 21.0" Round Pipe Outlet L= 18.0' RCP, end -section conforming to fill, Ke= 0.500 Inlet/ Outlet Invert= 958.00'/ 958.00' S=0.0000'/' Cc= 0.900 n=0.012 Concrete pipe, finished, Flow Area= 2.41 sf Discarded OutFlow Max=0.14 cfs @ 12.59 hrs HW=958.59' (Free Discharge) L1=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.14 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=1.04 cfs @ 12.59 hrs HW=958.59' TW=0.00' (Dynamic Tailwater) L2=Pipe Outlet (Barrel Controls 1.04 cfs @ 2.19 fps) Spaeth Ind Park, Monticello, MN 00633 Pro Cond MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" Prepared by CESD HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 01607 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 7 Summary for Subcatchment S1: Pro Cond Onsite to UGS Runoff = 11.19 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 27,575 cf, Depth= 3.29" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" Area (sf) CN Description 90,193 98 Impervious, HSG A 10,336 39 Pervious, >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 100,529 92 Weighted Average 10,336 10.28% Pervious Area 90,193 89.72% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, User Defined Summary for Subcatchment S2a: Ex Cond Offsite Draining East to Area S1 Runoff = 0.00 cfs @ 13.37 hrs, Volume= 20 cf, Depth= 0.07" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" Area (sf) CN Description 0 98 Impervious, HSG A 3,612 39 Pervious, HSG A 3,612 39 Weighted Average 3,612 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, User Defined Summary for Subcatchment S2b: Ex Cond Offsite Draining East to Area S6 Runoff = 0.59 cfs @ 12.42 hrs, Volume= 3,587 cf, Depth= 0.39" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" Area (sf) CN Description 20,886 98 Impervious, HSG A 89,430 39 Pervious, HSG A 110,316 50 Weighted Average 89,430 81.07% Pervious Area 20,886 18.93% Impervious Area Spaeth Ind Park, Monticello, MN 00633 Pro Cond MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" Prepared by CESD HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 01607 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 8 Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 20.0 Direct Entry, User Defined Summary for Subcatchment S3: Pro Cond Onsite Draining North Runoff = 0.12 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 226 cf, Depth= 1.20" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" Area (sf) CN Description 1,052 98 Impervious, HSG A 1,213 39 Pervious, >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 2,265 66 Weighted Average 1,213 53.55% Pervious Area 1,052 46.45% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, User Defined Summary for Subcatchment S4: Pro Cond Onsite Draining South Runoff = 0.00 cfs @ 13.24 hrs, Volume= 8 cf, Depth= 0.07" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" Area (sf) CN Description 0 98 Impervious, HSG A 1,517 39 Pervious, >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 1,517 39 Weighted Average 1,517 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, User Defined Summary for Subcatchment S5: Pro Cond Onsite Draining East Runoff = 0.00 cfs @ 13.24 hrs, Volume= 16 cf, Depth= 0.07" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" Spaeth Ind Park, Monticello, MN 00633 Pro Cond MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" Prepared by CESD HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 01607 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 9 Area (sf) CN Description 0 98 Impervious, HSG A 2,942 39 Pervious, >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 2,942 39 Weighted Average 2,942 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, User Defined Summary for Subcatchment S6: Pro Cond Onsite to System Runoff = 4.95 cfs @ 12.29 hrs, Volume= 16,000 cf, Depth= 2.27" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" Area (sf) CN Description 58,779 98 Impervious, HSG A 19,242 39 Pervious, >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 6,422 49 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG A 84,443 81 Weighted Average 25,664 30.39% Pervious Area 58,779 69.61 % Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 20.0 Direct Entry, User Defined Summary for Reach 1 R: Total Project Inflow Area = 305,624 sf, 55.92% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.58" for 10 -Year event Inflow = 5.10 cfs @ 12.32 hrs, Volume= 14,742 cf Outflow = 5.10 cfs @ 12.32 hrs, Volume= 14,742 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Summary for Pond IB: Infiltration Basin Inflow Area = 194,759 sf, 40.90% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.21" for 10 -Year event Inflow = 5.39 cfs @ 12.31 hrs, Volume= 19,586 cf Outflow = 0.15 cfs @ 17.88 hrs, Volume= 19,587 cf, Atten= 97%, Lag= 334.3 min Discarded = 0.15 cfs @ 17.88 hrs, Volume= 19,587 cf Primary = 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0 cf Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 958.13' @ 17.88 hrs Surf.Area= 8,263 sf Storage= 13,892 cf Plug -Flow detention time= (not calculated: outflow precedes inflow) Spaeth Ind Park, Monticello, MN 00633 Pro Cond MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" Prepared by CESD HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 01607 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 10 Center -of -Mass det. time= 997.3 min ( 1,829.4 - 832.1 ) Summary for Pond UGS: Under Ground System Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description Inflow Depth = 1.11" for 10 -Year event #1 956.00' 44,682 cf Infiltration Basin (Conic)Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store Wet.Area (feet) (sq -ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) (sq -ft) 956.00 4,819 0 0 4,819 957.00 6,422 5,601 5,601 6,444 958.00 8,142 7,265 12,866 8,190 959.00 9,133 8,633 21,499 9,234 960.00 11,796 10,436 31,935 11,922 961.00 13,722 12,747 44,682 13,889 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Discarded 956.00' 0.800 in/hr Exfiltration over Horizontal area #2 Primary 958.50' 18.0" Round Pipe Outlet L= 17.0' RCP, end -section conforming to fill, Ke= 0.500 Inlet/ Outlet Invert= 958.50'/ 958.50' S=0.0000? Cc= 0.900 n=0.012 Concrete pipe, finished, Flow Area= 1.77 sf Discarded OutFlow Max=0.15 cfs @ 17.88 hrs HW=958.13' (Free Discharge) L1=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.15 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs HW=956.00' TW=955.50' (Dynamic Tailwater) L2=Pipe Outlet ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 959.34' @ 12.32 hrs Surf.Area= 8,492 sf Storage= 11,941 cf Plug -Flow detention time= (not calculated: outflow precedes inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 299.5 min ( 1,079.3 - 779.8 ) Volume Summary for Pond UGS: Under Ground System Inflow Area = 298,900 sf, 56.83% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.11" for 10 -Year event Inflow = 11.19 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 27,595 cf Outflow = 5.23 cfs @ 12.32 hrs, Volume= 27,595 cf, Atten= 53%, Lag= 9.0 min Discarded = 0.16 cfs @ 12.32 hrs, Volume= 13,104 cf Primary = 5.07 cfs @ 12.32 hrs, Volume= 14,491 cf Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 959.34' @ 12.32 hrs Surf.Area= 8,492 sf Storage= 11,941 cf Plug -Flow detention time= (not calculated: outflow precedes inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 299.5 min ( 1,079.3 - 779.8 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 955.50' 8,514 cf 7.00'W x 571.00'L x 4.00'H Rock Encasement Z=1.0 25,321 cf Overall - 4,036 cf Embedded = 21,285 cf x 40.0% Voids #2 959.50' 4,122 cf 14.50'W x 571.00'L x 1.50'H Sand over Rock Encasement Z=1.0 13,741 cf Overall x 30.0% Voids #3 956.50' 4,036 cf 36.0" Round Pipe Storage Inside #1 L= 571.0' 16,673 cf Total Available Storage Spaeth Ind Park, Monticello, MN 00633 Pro Cond MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" Prepared by CESD HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 01607 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 11 Device Routinq Invert Outlet Devices #1 Discarded 955.50' 0.800 in/hr Exfiltration over Horizontal area #2 Primary 958.00' 21.0" Round Pipe Outlet L= 18.0' RCP, end -section conforming to fill, Ke= 0.500 Inlet/ Outlet Invert= 958.00'/ 958.00' S=0.0000'/' Cc= 0.900 n=0.012 Concrete pipe, finished, Flow Area= 2.41 sf Discarded OutFlow Max=0.16 cfs @ 12.32 hrs HW=959.34' (Free Discharge) L1=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.16 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=5.07 cfs @ 12.32 hrs HW=959.34' TW=0.00' (Dynamic Tailwater) L2=Pipe Outlet (Barrel Controls 5.07 cfs @ 3.55 fps) Spaeth Ind Park, Monticello, MN 00633 Pro Cond MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Prepared by CESD HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 01607 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 12 Summary for Subcatchment S1: Pro Cond Onsite to UGS Runoff = 19.62 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 50,145 cf, Depth= 5.99" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Area (sf) CN Description 90,193 98 Impervious, HSG A 10,336 39 Pervious, >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 100,529 92 Weighted Average 10,336 10.28% Pervious Area 90,193 89.72% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, User Defined Summary for Subcatchment S2a: Ex Cond Offsite Draining East to Area S1 Runoff = 0.06 cfs @ 12.22 hrs, Volume= 224 cf, Depth= 0.74" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Area (sf) CN Description 0 98 Impervious, HSG A 3,612 39 Pervious, HSG A 3,612 39 Weighted Average 3,612 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, User Defined Summary for Subcatchment S2b: Ex Cond Offsite Draining East to Area S6 Runoff = 4.08 cfs @ 12.33 hrs, Volume= 14,966 cf, Depth= 1.63" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Area (sf) CN Description 20,886 98 Impervious, HSG A 89,430 39 Pervious, HSG A 110,316 50 Weighted Average 89,430 81.07% Pervious Area 20,886 18.93% Impervious Area Spaeth Ind Park, Monticello, MN 00633 Pro Cond MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Prepared by CESD HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 01607 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 13 Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 20.0 Direct Entry, User Defined Summary for Subcatchment S3: Pro Cond Onsite Draining North Runoff = 0.32 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 594 cf, Depth= 3.15" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Area (sf) CN Description 1,052 98 Impervious, HSG A 1,213 39 Pervious, >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 2,265 66 Weighted Average 1,213 53.55% Pervious Area 1,052 46.45% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, User Defined Summary for Subcatchment S4: Pro Cond Onsite Draining South Runoff = 0.03 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 94 cf, Depth= 0.74" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Area (sf) CN Description 0 98 Impervious, HSG A 1,517 39 Pervious, >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 1,517 39 Weighted Average 1,517 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, User Defined Summary for Subcatchment S5: Pro Cond Onsite Draining East Runoff = 0.06 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 182 cf, Depth= 0.74" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Spaeth Ind Park, Monticello, MN 00633 Pro Cond MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Prepared by CESD HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 01607 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 14 Area (sf) CN Description 0 98 Impervious, HSG A 2,942 39 Pervious, >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 2,942 39 Weighted Average 2,942 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, User Defined Summary for Subcatchment S6: Pro Cond Onsite to System Runoff = 10.20 cfs @ 12.29 hrs, Volume= 33,355 cf, Depth= 4.74" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Area (sf) CN Description 58,779 98 Impervious, HSG A 19,242 39 Pervious, >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 6,422 49 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG A 84,443 81 Weighted Average 25,664 30.39% Pervious Area 58,779 69.61 % Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 20.0 Direct Entry, User Defined Summary for Reach 1 R: Total Project Inflow Area = 305,624 sf, 55.92% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.27" for 100 -Year event Inflow = 14.73 cfs @ 12.24 hrs, Volume= 57,755 cf Outflow = 14.73 cfs @ 12.24 hrs, Volume= 57,755 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Summary for Pond IB: Infiltration Basin Inflow Area = 194,759 sf, 40.90% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.98" for 100 -Year event Inflow = 14.15 cfs @ 12.30 hrs, Volume= 48,320 cf Outflow = 2.81 cfs @ 12.93 hrs, Volume= 48,322 cf, Atten= 80%, Lag= 38.1 min Discarded = 0.19 cfs @ 12.93 hrs, Volume= 26,324 cf Primary = 2.62 cfs @ 12.93 hrs, Volume= 21,998 cf Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 959.49' @ 12.93 hrs Surf.Area= 10,396 sf Storage= 26,284 cf Plug -Flow detention time= (not calculated: outflow precedes inflow) Spaeth Ind Park, Monticello, MN 00633 Pro Cond MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Prepared by CESD HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 01607 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 15 Center -of -Mass det. time= 696.3 min ( 1,514.6 - 818.3 ) Summary for Pond UGS: Under Ground System Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description Inflow Depth = 2.91" for 100 -Year event #1 956.00' 44,682 cf Infiltration Basin (Conic)Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store Wet.Area (feet) (sq -ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) (sq -ft) 956.00 4,819 0 0 4,819 957.00 6,422 5,601 5,601 6,444 958.00 8,142 7,265 12,866 8,190 959.00 9,133 8,633 21,499 9,234 960.00 11,796 10,436 31,935 11,922 961.00 13,722 12,747 44,682 13,889 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Discarded 956.00' 0.800 in/hr Exfiltration over Horizontal area #2 Primary 958.50' 18.0" Round Pipe Outlet L= 17.0' RCP, end -section conforming to fill, Ke= 0.500 Inlet/ Outlet Invert= 958.50'/ 958.50' S=0.0000? Cc= 0.900 n=0.012 Concrete pipe, finished, Flow Area= 1.77 sf Discarded OutFlow Max=0.19 cfs @ 12.93 hrs HW=959.49' (Free Discharge) L1=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.19 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=2.62 cfs @ 12.93 hrs HW=959.49' TW=959.22' (Dynamic Tailwater) L2=Pipe Outlet (Barrel Controls 2.62 cfs @ 3.00 fps) Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 960.73' @ 12.24 hrs Surf.Area= 18,413 sf Storage= 15,877 cf Plug -Flow detention time= (not calculated: outflow precedes inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 144.8 min ( 952.4 - 807.6 ) Volume Summary for Pond UGS: Under Ground System Inflow Area = 298,900 sf, 56.83% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.91" for 100 -Year event Inflow = 19.67 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 72,366 cf Outflow = 14.89 cfs @ 12.24 hrs, Volume= 72,367 cf, Atten= 24%, Lag= 4.3 min Discarded = 0.34 cfs @ 12.24 hrs, Volume= 15,483 cf Primary = 14.55 cfs @ 12.24 hrs, Volume= 56,884 cf Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 960.73' @ 12.24 hrs Surf.Area= 18,413 sf Storage= 15,877 cf Plug -Flow detention time= (not calculated: outflow precedes inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 144.8 min ( 952.4 - 807.6 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 955.50' 8,514 cf 7.00'W x 571.00'L x 4.00'H Rock Encasement Z=1.0 25,321 cf Overall - 4,036 cf Embedded = 21,285 cf x 40.0% Voids #2 959.50' 4,122 cf 14.50'W x 571.00'L x 1.50'H Sand over Rock Encasement Z=1.0 13,741 cf Overall x 30.0% Voids #3 956.50' 4,036 cf 36.0" Round Pipe Storage Inside #1 L= 571.0' 16,673 cf Total Available Storage Spaeth Ind Park, Monticello, MN 00633 Pro Cond MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Prepared by CESD HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 01607 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 16 Device Routinq Invert Outlet Devices #1 Discarded 955.50' 0.800 in/hr Exfiltration over Horizontal area #2 Primary 958.00' 21.0" Round Pipe Outlet L= 18.0' RCP, end -section conforming to fill, Ke= 0.500 Inlet/ Outlet Invert= 958.00'/ 958.00' S=0.0000'/' Cc= 0.900 n=0.012 Concrete pipe, finished, Flow Area= 2.41 sf Discarded OutFlow Max=0.34 cfs @ 12.24 hrs HW=960.73' (Free Discharge) L1=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.34 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=14.54 cfs @ 12.24 hrs HW=960.73' TW=0.00' (Dynamic Tailwater) L2=Pipe Outlet (Barrel Controls 14.54 cfs @ 6.04 fps) APPENDIX C Volume Abstraction 1.0" Rainfall on New Impervious Surface and Stage -Storage Containment Volume Data Spaeth Industrial Park, Monticello, MN Drainage Analysis SPAETH INDUSTRIAL PARK, MONTICELLO, MN INFILTRATION WORKSHEET Requirements: Infiltrate runoff generated from a 1.1" rainfall over the applicable new impervious surface within 48 hours. Step 1: Determine areas of impervious surfaces area and effective infiltration. New impervious surface area = 150,032 sf Effective Infiltration Area = Underground System + Infiltration Basin Underground System = 571 if x 7 ft = 3,997 sf Infiltration Basin = 4,819 sf at bottom contour 956 elevation Total = 3,997 + 4,819 = 8,816 sf Step 2: Calculate runoff volume from increase impervious surface generated by 1.1" storm. 150,032 sf x 1.0 x 1.1 inch x lft/12inch = 13,753 cf Net Increased Coefficient Rainfall Volume Impervious Required to be Surface Area Infiltrated Step 3: Calculate volume capacity of being infiltrated on site in 48 hours. Use infiltration rate for Type A soils = 0.80 in/hr. 8,816 sf x 0.80 in/hr x 48 hrs x lft/12inch = 28,211 cf Effective Infiltration Volume Infiltration Rate Capacity Area in 48 Hours Step 4: Compare volume capacity to volume required to be infiltrated. 28,211 cf > 13,753 cf Volume Volume Capacity Required to be in 48 Hours Infiltrated 00633 Pro Cond MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Prepared by CESD HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 01607 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Stage -Area -Storage for Pond IB: Infiltration Basin Elevation Surface Horizontal Storage (feet) (sq -ft) (sq -ft) (cubic -feet) 956.00 4,819 4,819 0 956.10 4,969 4,969 489 956.20 5,121 5,121 994 956.30 5,276 5,276 1,514 956.40 5,433 5,433 2,049 956.50 5,592 5,592 2,600 956.60 5,753 5,753 3,168 956.70 5,917 5,917 3,751 956.80 6,083 6,083 4,351 956.90 6,251 6,251 4,968 957.00 6,422 6,422 5,601 957.10 6,585 6,585 6,252 957.20 6,750 6,750 6,918 957.30 6,917 6,917 7,602 957.40 7,086 7,086 8,302 957.50 7,257 7,257 9,019 957.60 7,430 7,430 9,753 957.70 7,605 7,605 10,505 957.80 7,782 7,782 11,274 957.90 7,961 7,961 12,061 958.00 8,142 8,142 12,866 958.10 8,239 8,239 13,685 958.20 8,336 8,336 14,514 958.30 8,433 8,433 15,353 958.40 8,532 8,532 16,201 958.50 8,630 8,630 17,059 958.60 8,730 8,730 17,927 958.70 8,830 8,830 18,805 958.80 8,930 8,930 19,693 958.90 9,031 9,031 20,591 959.00 9,133 9,133 21,499 959.10 9,384 9,384 22,425 959.20 9,638 9,638 23,376 959.30 9,896 9,896 24,353 959.40 10,157 10,157 25,355 959.50 10,422 10,422 26,384 959.60 10,690 10,690 27,440 959.70 10,961 10,961 28,522 959.80 11,236 11,236 29,632 959.90 11,514 11,514 30,770 960.00 11,796 11,796 31,935 960.10 11,982 11,982 33,124 960.20 12,170 12,170 34,332 960.30 12,359 12,359 35,558 960.40 12,549 12,549 36,803 960.50 12,741 12,741 38,068 960.60 12,934 12,934 39,352 960.70 13,129 13,129 40,655 960.80 13,325 13,325 41,978 960.90 13,523 13,523 43,320 961.00 13,722 13,722 44,682 00633 Pro Cond MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Prepared by CESD HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 01607 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Stage -Area -Storage for Pond UGS: Under Ground System Elevation Horizontal Storage Elevation (feet) (sq -ft) (cubic -feet) (feet) 955.50 3,997 0 960.80 955.60 4,113 162 960.90 955.70 4,228 329 961.00 955.80 4,344 500 955.90 4,460 677 956.00 4,576 857 956.10 4,692 1,043 956.20 4,808 1,233 956.30 4,924 1,427 956.40 5,041 1,627 956.50 5,157 1,831 956.60 5,273 2,064 956.70 5,390 2,322 956.80 5,507 2,596 956.90 5,623 2,885 957.00 5,740 3,185 957.10 5,857 3,497 957.20 5,974 3,818 957.30 6,091 4,148 957.40 6,208 4,487 957.50 6,325 4,833 957.60 6,442 5,187 957.70 6,560 5,547 957.80 6,677 5,913 957.90 6,794 6,284 958.00 6,912 6,661 958.10 7,030 7,043 958.20 7,147 7,429 958.30 7,265 7,818 958.40 7,383 8,211 958.50 7,501 8,607 958.60 7,619 9,005 958.70 7,737 9,404 958.80 7,855 9,805 958.90 7,974 10,206 959.00 8,092 10,607 959.10 8,210 11,007 959.20 8,329 11,403 959.30 8,448 11,796 959.40 8,566 12,180 959.50 16,965 12,550 959.60 17,082 12,800 959.70 17,199 13,054 959.80 17,316 13,311 959.90 17,434 13,572 960.00 17,551 13,836 960.10 17,669 14,104 960.20 17,786 14,375 960.30 17,904 14,650 960.40 18,022 14,928 960.50 18,140 15,210 960.60 18,257 15,496 960.70 18,375 15,784 Horizontal Storage (sq -ft) (cubic -feet) 18,494 16,077 18,612 16,373 18,730 16,673 APPENDIX D Soils Data Spaeth Industrial Park, Monticello, MN Drainage Analysis H U GO IATA a ■ June 27, 2017 Mr. Ken Spaeth Spaeth Masonry 108 Meadowlark Road SE St. Michael, MN 55376 HGTS Project Number: 17-0518 Re: Geotechnical Exploration Report, Proposed Spaeth Industrial Park Development, 107 Dundas Road, Monticello, Minnesota Dear Mr. Spaeth: We have completed the geotechnical exploration report for the proposed Spaeth Industrial Park development at 107 Dundas Road in Monticello, Minnesota. Development plans include 8 new buildings, parking lots and drive lanes, utilities and an infiltration pond. A brief summary of our results and recommendations are presented below. Specific details regarding our procedures, results and recommendations follow in the attached geotechnical exploration report. Six (6) soil borings were completed for this project that encountered about 1 to 2 feet of topsoil and existing Fill over glacial outwash sands which extended to the soil boring termination depths. Groundwater was not encountered in the soil borings while drilling and sampling or after auger removal from the boreholes. The topsoil and existing Fill are potentially compressible and unsuitable for building support. These soils will need to be removed from below the building and oversize areas and replaced with compacted engineered fill. The underling outwash sands are generally suitable for building support. With the building pads prepared as recommended it is our opinion that the footings for can be supported on the native outwash soils or compacted engineered fill designed for a net allowable soil bearing pressure up to 3,000 pounds per square foot. Thank you for the opportunity to assist you on this project. If you have any questions or need additional information please contact Brett Maki at 612-269-4027 or Paul Gionfriddo at 763-954-1101. Sincerely, HAUGO GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES, LLC Brett S. Maki, P.E. Project Engineer Paul Gionfriddo, P.E. Senior Engineer 2825 Cedar Avenue S, Minneapolis, Mild 55407 GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION REPORT PROJECT: Proposed Spaeth Industrial Park Development 107 Dundas Road Monticello, Minnesota PREPARED FOR: Spaeth Masonry 108 Meadowlark Road SE St. Michael, MN 55376 PREPARED BY: Haugo GeoTechnical Services, LLC 2825 Cedar Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55407 Haugo GeoTechnical Services Project: 17-0518 June 27, 2017 I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Paul Gionfriddo, P.E. Senior Engineer License Number 23093 Expires June 2018 Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Project Description 1.2 Purpose 1.3 Site Description 1.4 Scope of Services 1.5 Documents Provided 1.6 Locations and Elevations 2.0 FIELD PROCEDURES 3.0 RESULTS 3.1 Soil Conditions 3.2 Groundwater 3.3 Laboratory Tests 3.4 OSHA Soil Classification 4.0 DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 4.1 Proposed Construction 4.2 Discussion 4.3 Mass Grading Recommendations 4.4 Below Grade Walls 4.5 Interior Slabs 4.6 Exterior Slabs 4.7 Site Grading and Drainage 4.8 Utilities 4.9 Bituminous Pavements 4.10 Soil Infiltration 5.0 CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS 5.1 Excavation 5.2 Observations 5.3 Backfill and Fills 5.4 Testing 5.5 Winter Construction 6.0 PROCEDURES 6.1 Soil Classification 6.2 Groundwater Observations 7.0 GENERAL 7.1 Subsurface Variations 7.2 Review of Design 7.3 Groundwater Fluctuations 7.4 Use of Report 7.5 Level of Care APPENDIX Soil Boring Location Sketch, Figure 1 GPS Boring Locations, Figure 2 Soil Boring Logs SB -1 thru SB -6 Infiltrometer Test Descriptive Terminology 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 5 6 6 6 7 7 7 8 9 9 9 9 9 10 10 10 10 10 10 11 11 11 11 12 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Project Description Spaeth Masonry is proposing to construct an Industrial Park development at 107 Dundas Road in Monticello, Minnesota. Development plans include 8 one story buildings, each with a footprint of about 7,000 square feet, bituminous parking lots and drive lanes, underground utilities and an infiltration pond. 1.2 Purpose Spaeth Masonry retained Haugo GeoTechnical Services to perform a geotechnical exploration to evaluate the suitability of site soil conditions with respect to foundation support and pavement design of the proposed Industrial Park. 1.3 Site Description The site was vacant at the time of our exploration and was mostly grass covered with a few small trees on the south end of the lot. The lot was bordered by commercial or industrial buildings to the east and west and by a residential development to the south. The site topography is relatively flat with ground surface elevations at our soil boring locations ranging from about 961 1/2to 963 feet mean sea level (MSL). 1.4 Scope of Services Our services were performed in accordance with the Haugo GeoTechnical Services LLC proposal and under the terms of our General Conditions. Our scope of services was limited to the following tasks: • Completing six (6) standard penetration test borings, extending each boring to a nominal depth of 20 feet. • Obtaining ground surface elevations and GPS coordinates at the soil boring locations. • Visually/ manually classifying the samples recovered from the soil borings. • Performing laboratory tests on selected samples. • Preparing soil boring logs describing the materials encountered and the results of groundwater level measurements. • Preparing an engineering report describing soil and groundwater conditions, and providing recommendations for foundation support. 1.5 Documents Provided We were provided with a civil plan sheet C2 prepared by Civil Engineering Site Design titled "PUD -Development Stage Grading and Drainage Plan' dated May 8, 2017. The 1 plan shows the approximate locations and grades of the new buildings, parking lots, underground utilities and infiltration pond. Specific design information for the proposed building such as building structural loads were not available at the time of this report. 1.6 Locations and Elevations The soil boring locations were selected by HGTS based on the anticipated construction and site access. The approximate location of the soil borings are shown on Figure 1, "Soil Boring Location Sketch", in the Appendix. The sketch was prepared by HGTS using the civil plan sheet provided as a base. Ground surface elevations at the soil borings were obtained by HGTS using GPS measuring equipment. Elevations were based on MN County Coordinates System mean sea level using the GEOID09 (Conus) model. GPS coordinates at the boring locations are provided in Figure 1 in the Appendix. 2.0 FIELD PROCEDURES Six (6) standard penetration test borings were advanced on June 8, 2017 by HGTS with a rotary drilling rig, using continuous flight augers to advance the boreholes. Representative samples were obtained from the borings, using the split -barrel sampling procedures in general accordance with ASTM Specification D-1586. In the split -barrel sampling procedure, a 2 -inch O.D. split -barrel spoon is driven into the ground with a 140 -pound hammer falling 30 inches. The number of blows required to drive the sampling spoon the last 12 inches of an 18 -inch penetration is recorded as the standard penetration resistance value, or "N" value. The results of the standard penetration tests are indicated on the boring log. The samples were sealed in containers and provided to the HGTS office for testing and soil classification. A field log of each boring was prepared by the HGTS drill crew. The logs contained visual classifications of the soil materials encountered during drilling, as well as the driller's interpretation of the subsurface conditions between samples and water observation notes. The final boring logs included with this report represent an interpretation of the field logs and include modifications based on visual/manual method observation of the samples. The soil boring logs, general terminology for soil description and identification, and classification of soils for engineering purposes are also included in the appendix. The soil boring logs identify and describe the materials encountered, the relative density or consistency based on the Standard Penetration resistance (N -value, "blows per foot") and groundwater observations. 2 The strata changes were inferred from the changes in the samples and auger cuttings. The depths shown as changes between strata are only approximate. The changes are likely transitions, variations can occur beyond the location of the boring. 3.0 RESULTS 3.1 Soil Conditions The soil borings encountered about 1 foot of surficial topsoil. Boring SB -3 encountered about 1 foot of poorly graded sand with silt Fill over about 1 foot of buried topsoil. The topsoil consisted of silty sand which was black in color, while the Fill was grey in color and contained traces of gravel. Underlying the topsoil and Fill, native glacial outwash sand soils were encountered to the soil boring termination depths. The outwash sands consist mainly of poorly graded sand, with some areas of poorly graded sand with silt. The sands were brown in color, and contained variable amounts of gravel. Penetration resistance values (N -Values), shown as blows per foot (bpf) on the boring logs, within the native soils ranged from 5 to 31 bpf. These values indicate the soils had a loose to dense relative density, with the majority of the soils having a medium dense relative density. 3.2 Groundwater Groundwater was not encountered in the soil borings while drilling and sampling or after auger withdrawal from the boreholes. Groundwater monitoring wells or piezometers in conjunction with deeper soil boring(s) would be required to more accurately determine water levels. Water levels were measured on the dates as noted on the boring logs and the period of water level observations was relatively short. Seasonal and annual fluctuations in the groundwater levels should be expected. 3.3 Laboratory Tests Laboratory moisture content tests and percent passing the number 200 sieve (P-200) tests were performed on selected samples recovered from the soil borings. Table 1 below summarizes the results of the laboratory tests. Results of the laboratory moisture content tests are also shown on the boring logs adjacent to the sample tested. Table 1. Summary of Laboratory Tests Boring Sample Depth Moisture P-200 Number Number (feet) Content (%) (%)* SB -5 S-34 121/2 71/2 21/2 SB -6 S-42 15 5 5 *Values rounded to the nearest 1/2 Percent 3 3.4 OSHA Soil Classification The soils encountered in the borings were mainly poorly graded sand and poorly graded sand with silt soils corresponding to the ASTM classification SP and SP -SM. The soils identified in the borings will generally be Type C soils under Department of Labor Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) guidelines. 4.0 DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 4.1 Proposed Construction Development plans include constructing eight (8) one story commercial buildings, each with a footprint of about 7,000 square feet. The development will also include bituminous parking lots, underground utilities and an infiltration pond. Specific design information such as building structural loads were not available at the time of this report. We assume each building will be a slab on grade structure and will be constructed with concrete or masonry block foundation walls supported on concrete spread footings. We assume above grade construction could include masonry exterior perimeter walls or pre -cast concrete wall panels, interior steel columns with steel roof trusses, metal decking and a ballasted rubber membrane roof. Based on the site plan provided we anticipate the main floor for each building will bear at elevation 963.5. With the ground surface currently ranging from about elevation 961 1/2 to 963 we anticipate fills on the order of 2 feet will be required to attain site grades. Based on the assumed construction we anticipate that soil bearing pressure(s) up to 3,000 pounds per square foot (psf) will be required for adequate foundation support. We have attempted to describe our understanding of the project. If the proposed loads exceed these values or if the design or location of the proposed building changes, we should be informed. Additional analyses and revised recommendations may be necessary. 4.2 Discussion The soil borings in the proposed building area generally encountered 1 to 2 feet of topsoil and Fill over glacial outwash sands which extended to the soil boring termination depths. Groundwater was not encountered in the soil borings while drilling or after auger withdrawal from the boreholes. We do not anticipate that groundwater will be encountered during construction The topsoil and Fill are potentially compressible and unsuitable for building support. The underling native outwash sands are generally suitable for building support. Soil 4 corrections will be required to remove the vegetation, topsoil and Fill soils. Engineered fill would then be placed for building support. The following sections provide recommendations for site development. 4.3 Mass Grading Recommendations Excavations We recommend that all vegetation, topsoil and Fill be removed from the proposed building and oversize areas. Table 2 below summarizes the anticipated excavation depths at the boring locations. Excavation depths may vary and could be deeper. Table 2. Anticipated Mass Grading Excavation Depths Fill Material Fill required to attain site grades and may consist of any debris -free, non- organic mineral soil. Site soils identified as poorly graded sand and poorly graded sand with silt (SP and SP -SM) are generally suitable for use or re -use as fill or backfill provided it is free of organic material or other deleterious material. Some moisture conditioning (wetting) of these soils will likely be required to meet the recommended compaction levels. The topsoil, including soils that are black in color, removed during soil corrections are not suitable for re -use as fill or backfill. It may be possible to re -use these materials in "green areas' on the site such as landscaping berms. Following soil corrections, we recommend that the exposed soil in the base of the excavations and any soils disturbed during excavation activities be surface compacted prior to placing the footings or additional fill to increase their density and uniformity. Backfilling We recommend that backfill placed to attain foundation grades be compacted to a minimum of 98 percent of its standard Proctor density (ASTM D 698) and that backfill placed to attain floor slab grades be compacted to a minimum of 95 percent of its standard Proctor density (ASTM D 698). Granular fill classified as SP or SP -SM should be placed within 65 percent to 105 percent of its optimum moisture content as determined by the standard Proctor. Remaining fill soils, if any, should be placed within 3 percentage points above and 1 percentage point below its optimum moisture content as determined by the standard Proctor. All fill should be placed in thin 5 Measured Anticipated Anticipated Boring Surface Excavation Excavation Number Elevation Depth (feet)* Elevation (feet)* (feet) SB -1 962.0 1 961 SB -2 962.9 1 962 SB -3 961.4 2 9591/2 SB -4 961.6 1 9601/2 SB -5 961.6 1 9601/2 SB -6 962.5 1 9611/2 *Excavation depths and elevation were rounded to the nearest 1/2 foot. Fill Material Fill required to attain site grades and may consist of any debris -free, non- organic mineral soil. Site soils identified as poorly graded sand and poorly graded sand with silt (SP and SP -SM) are generally suitable for use or re -use as fill or backfill provided it is free of organic material or other deleterious material. Some moisture conditioning (wetting) of these soils will likely be required to meet the recommended compaction levels. The topsoil, including soils that are black in color, removed during soil corrections are not suitable for re -use as fill or backfill. It may be possible to re -use these materials in "green areas' on the site such as landscaping berms. Following soil corrections, we recommend that the exposed soil in the base of the excavations and any soils disturbed during excavation activities be surface compacted prior to placing the footings or additional fill to increase their density and uniformity. Backfilling We recommend that backfill placed to attain foundation grades be compacted to a minimum of 98 percent of its standard Proctor density (ASTM D 698) and that backfill placed to attain floor slab grades be compacted to a minimum of 95 percent of its standard Proctor density (ASTM D 698). Granular fill classified as SP or SP -SM should be placed within 65 percent to 105 percent of its optimum moisture content as determined by the standard Proctor. Remaining fill soils, if any, should be placed within 3 percentage points above and 1 percentage point below its optimum moisture content as determined by the standard Proctor. All fill should be placed in thin 5 lifts and be compacted with a large self-propelled vibratory compactor operating in vibratory mode. Foundations We recommend the perimeter footings bear a minimum of 42 inches below the exterior grade for frost protection. Interior footings may be placed immediately below the slab provided construction does not occur during below freezing weather conditions. Foundation elements in unheated areas should bear at least 5 feet below exterior grade for frost protection. We anticipate the foundations and floor slabs will bear on compacted engineered fill or native glacial outwash sand soils. With the building pad prepared as recommended it is our opinion the footings can be designed for a net allowable bearing pressure up to 3,000 pounds per square foot (psf). We anticipate total and differential settlement of the foundations will be less than 1 inch and 1/z inch, respectively, across and approximate 30 foot span. 4.4 Below Grade Walls We anticipate that the proposed buildings will be slab on -grade structure with no below grade or basement levels. Estimated soil parameters and recommendations for below grade wall design and construction can be provided if requested or required. 4.5 Interior Slabs The anticipated floor subgrade is sand soils. It is our opinion a modulus of subgrade reaction, k, of 250 pounds per square inch of deflection (psi) may be used to design the floor. If floor coverings or coatings less permeable than the concrete slab will be used, we recommend that a vapor retarder or vapor barrier be placed immediately beneath the slab. Some contractors prefer to bury the vapor barrier or vapor retarder beneath a layer of sand to reduce curling and shrinkage, but this practice often traps water between the slab and vapor retarder or barrier. Regardless of where the vapor retarder or vapor barrier is placed, we recommend consulting the floor covering manufacturer regarding the appropriate type, use and installation of the vapor retarder or vapor barrier to preserve the warranty. We recommend following all state and local building codes in regards to a radon mitigation plan beneath interior slabs. 4.6 Exterior Slabs Exterior slabs will likely be underlain by slightly to non- frost -susceptible soils consisting predominantly of poorly graded sand and poorly graded sand with silt. This being the case, it is our opinion that special subgrade improvements in excess of removing the M existing vegetation and topsoil in advance of slab construction will not be required. However, we recommend sloping exterior slabs to drain away from the building. 4.7 Site Grading and Drainage We recommend the site be graded to provide positive run-off away from the proposed building. We recommend landscaped areas be sloped a minimum of 6 inches within 10 feet of the building and slabs be sloped a minimum of 2 inches. In addition we recommend downspouts with long splash blocks or extensions for each house. We recommend the lowest floor grades be constructed to maintain at least a 2 -foot separation between the lowest floor slab and 100 year flood levels of any adjacent water features such as storm water ponds, detention basins and ditches. 4.8 Utilities We anticipate that the utilities will be supported on native glacial outwash sand soils which in our opinion are suitable for pipe support. We recommend removing all existing vegetation, topsoil or other unsuitable soil, if encountered, beneath utilities prior to placement. We recommend bedding material be thoroughly compacted around the pipes. We recommend trench backfill above the pipes be compacted to a minimum of 95 percent beneath slabs and pavements, the exception being within 3 feet of the proposed pavement subgrade, where 100 percent of standard Proctor density is required. In landscaped areas we recommend a minimum compaction of 90 percent. Groundwater was not encountered in the soil borings while drilling and sampling or after auger withdrawal from the boreholes. We do not anticipate that groundwater will be encountered. 4.9 Bituminous Pavements We were not provided specific information regarding traffic volumes, vehicle types, vehicle distribution or projected growth rates. We anticipate the parking and drive lanes will be used automobiles and light trucks as well as heavy duty single unit and multi- unit (tractor -trailer) trucks so that both heavy duty and light duty pavements will be required. Based on the assumed traffic types and the number of parking stalls we estimate the parking and drive lanes will be subjected to less than 70,000 Equivalent Single Axle Loads (ESAL's) over a design life of 20 years. We recommend removing all vegetation, topsoil and Fill from beneath the pavement subgrade. Prior to placing the aggregate base (Class 5) we recommend the subgrade soils be surface compacted with a large self-propelled vibratory compactor operating in vibratory mode.to identify soft, weak, loose or unstable areas that may require additional subcuts. 7 Backfill, if needed, to attain pavement subgrade elevation can consist of any mineral soil provided it is free of organic material or other deleterious materials. Granular fill classified as SP or SP -SM should be placed within 65 percent to 105 percent of its optimum moisture content as determined by the standard Proctor. We recommend that fill placed to attain pavement grades be compacted to a minimum of 95 percent of its standard Proctor density (ASTM D 698). The upper 3 feet of fill and backfill should be compacted to a minimum of 100 percent of its standard Proctor maximum dry density. R -Value testing was beyond the scope of this project. The soil borings mainly encountered poorly graded sand soils corresponding to the ASTM Classification SP. These soils typically have R -Values ranging from about 50 to 70. We recommend using an R -Value of 50 for the sand subgrade soils for pavement design. It should be noted that the pavement section presented below are not absolute. Depending on serviceability expectations, material availability, and cost, there will be circumstances under which alternative sections will be more practicable. For a light duty car parking lot with limited truck traffic, we recommend the pavement section consist of 3 inches of bituminous wear and 6 inches of aggregate base. For drive lanes and areas of heavy truck traffic, we recommend the pavement section consist of 4 inches of bituminous (2 inches of bituminous base and 2 inches of bituminous wear) and 8 inches of aggregate base. We recommend aggregate base meeting MN/DOT Class 5 aggregate base. We recommend the aggregate base be compacted to 100 percent of its maximum standard Proctor. We recommend that the bituminous pavements be compacted to at least 92 percent of the maximum theoretical density. We recommend specifying concrete that has a minimum 28 day compressive strength of 4,000 psi, and a modulus of rupture of at least 600 psi. We recommend Type I cement meeting the requirements of ASTM C150. We recommend specifying 5 to 7 percent entrained air for exposed concrete to provide resistance to freeze -thaw deterioration. We also recommend using a water/cement ratio of 0.45 or less for concrete exposed to deicers. 4.10 Soil Infiltration Based on the Site Plan provided, the project will include a storm water infiltration pond at the south end of the site. The bottom of the pond is anticipated to be constructed at or near elevation 957. Soil borings were not performed specifically for the storm water infiltration pond. However, based on the results of the soil borings completed for the proposed buildings, we anticipate that soils at the pond bottom elevation will consist of poorly graded sand or poorly graded sand with silt meeting the ASTM Classification SP or SP -SM. These soils are generally free -draining materials and generally well suited for storm water infiltration. We performed a double ring infiltrometer test within the proposed basin areas on June 21, 2017 to further evaluate the infiltration rates of the in-situ soils. The results of the infiltrometer test indicated an infiltration rate of 54 inches per hour (in/hr). We assume that compost will be blended with the upper sands to reduce the infiltration rate in the pond. 5.0 CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS 5.1 Excavation The soil borings indicated that at the anticipated excavation depths the soils in the sidewalls of the excavations will be primarily Type C soils under Department of Labor Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) guidelines. Temporary excavations in Type C soils should be constructed at a minimum of 11h foot horizontal to every 1 foot vertical. Slopes constructed in this manner may still exhibit surface sloughing. If site constraints do not allow the construction of slopes with these dimensions then temporary shoring may be required. 5.2 Observations A geotechnical engineer should observe the excavation subgrade to evaluate if the subgrade soils are similar to those encountered in the borings and adequate to support the proposed construction. 5.3 Backfill and Fills Portions of the sand site soils that will be excavated and reused as backfill and fill appear to be below their assumed optimum moisture content. We anticipate it will be necessary to moisture condition (wet) these soils to achieve the recommended compaction. We recommend that fill and backfill be placed in lifts not exceeding 4 to 12 inches, depending on the size of the compactor and materials used. 5.4 Testing We recommend density tests of backfill and fills placed during grading activities. Samples of the proposed materials should be submitted to our laboratory prior to placement for evaluation of their suitability and to determine their optimum moisture content and maximum dry density (Standard Proctor). 9 5.5 Winter Construction If site grading and construction is anticipated to proceed during cold weather, all snow and ice should be removed from cut and fill areas prior to additional grading and placement of fill. No fill should be placed on frozen soil and no frozen soil should be used as fill or backfill. Concrete delivered to the site should meet the temperature requirements of ASTM and/or ACI. Concrete should not be placed on frozen soil. Concrete should be protected from freezing until the necessary strength is obtained. Frost should not be permitted to penetrate below the footings. 6.0 PROCEDURES 6.1 Soil Classification The drill crew chief visually and manually classified the soils encountered in the borings in general accordance with ASTM D 2488, "Description and Identification of Soils (Visual -Manual Procedure)". Soil terminology notes are included in the Appendix. The samples were returned to our laboratory for review of the field classification by a soils engineer. Samples will be retained for a period of 30 days. 6.2 Groundwater Observations Immediately after taking the final samples in the bottom of the borings, the holes were checked for the presence of groundwater. Immediately after removing the augers from the borehole the holes were once again checked and the depth to water and cave-in depths were noted. 7.0 GENERAL 7.1 Subsurface Variations The analyses and recommendations presented in this report are based on data obtained from a limited number of soil borings. Variations can occur away from the borings, the nature of which may not become apparent until additional exploration work is completed or construction is conducted. A reevaluation of the recommendations in this report should be made after performing on-site observations during construction to note the characteristics of any variations. The variations may result in additional foundation costs and it is suggested that a contingency be provided for this purpose. It is recommended that we be retained to perform the observation and testing program during construction to evaluate whether the design is as expected, if any design changes have affected the validity of our recommendations, and if our recommendations have 10 been correctly interpreted and implemented in the designs, specifications and construction methods. This will allow correlation of the soil conditions encountered during construction to the soil borings and will provide continuity of professional responsibility. 7.2 Review of Design This report is based on the design of the proposed development as related to us for preparation of this report. It is recommended that we be retained to review the geotechnical aspects of the design and specifications. With the review we will evaluate whether any changes have affected the validity of the recommendations and whether our recommendations have been correctly interpreted and implemented in the design and specifications. 7.3 Groundwater Fluctuations We made water level measurements in the borings at the times and under the conditions stated on the boring logs. The data was interpreted in the text of this report. The period of observation was relatively short and fluctuations in the groundwater level may occur due to rainfall, flooding, irrigation, spring thaw, drainage, and other seasonal and annual factors not evident at the time the observations were made. Design drawings and specifications and construction planning should recognize the possibility of fluctuations. 7.4 Use of Report This report is for the exclusive use of Spaeth Masonry and their design team to use to design the proposed development and prepare construction documents. In the absence of our written approval, we make no representation and assume no responsibility to other parties regarding this report. The data, analysis and recommendations may not be appropriate for other structures or purposes. We recommend that parties contemplating other structures or purposes contact us. 7.5 Level of Care Haugo GeoTechnical Services, LLC has used the degree of skill and care ordinarily exercised under similar circumstance by members of the profession currently practicing in this locality. No warranty expressed or implied is made. 11 APPENDIX i....... ,x4..... DUNDAS ROAD t. [t' ���Ypa f - • 1 ----_ SB -1 SB -2 q5QO-W .3 SF G9?8 9` Y r J SB -4 i .. SB -3 PUL ING E a,lgl Sr- f t �m�G x _ FFF-Ga'l50 FSE-9P$.GG [rc K ��• { Jw y LF } SB -5 SB -6 9.976 Y -963[ .-... FFE-MAb t, ' • _: UY [ 43 '. 4 W-+ = Approximate Soil Boring Location E S Haugo GeoTechnical Soil Boring Location Sketch Figure #: 1 Services. Spaeth Industrial Park Drawn By: RD Date: 6/6/17 2825 Cedar Avenue S. Monticello, Minnesota Scale: None Minneapolis, MN 55407 Project #: 17-0518 H U GO HGTS# 17-0518 Figure 2: GPS Boring Locations Referencing Minnesota County Coordinates Basis - Wright County (GEOID09 Conus model). 2825 Cedar Avenue S, Minneapolis, MN 55407 Elevation Northing Easting Boring Number (US Survey Feet) Coordinate Coordinate SB -1 962.0 213956.982 523113.056 SB -2 962.9 213956.201 522967.980 SB -3 961.4 213708.151 523044.951 SB -4 961.6 213726.837 522908.908 SB -5 961.6 213534.714 523122.152 SB -6 962.5 213520.903 522947.587 Referencing Minnesota County Coordinates Basis - Wright County (GEOID09 Conus model). 2825 Cedar Avenue S, Minneapolis, MN 55407 AUGD Haugo GeoTechnical Services 2825 Cedar Ave Minneapolis, MN 554057 Telephone: 612-729-2959 CLIENT Spaeth Masonry PROJECT NUMBER 17-0518 DATE STARTED 6/5/17 COMPLETED 6/5/17 DRILLING CONTRACTOR HGTS DRILLING METHOD Hollow Stem Auger/Split Spoon LOGGED BY MS CHECKED BY JC NOTES U 2 Lu CL O MATERIAL DESCRIPTION CD c9 0.0 Silty Sand, black, moist. (Topsoil) BORING NUMBER SB -1 PAGE 1 OF 1 PROJECT NAME Spaeth Industrial Park PROJECT LOCATION Monticello, MN GROUND ELEVATION 962 ft HOLE SIZE 3 1/4 inches GROUND WATER LEVELS: (18) AT TIME OF DRILLING --- Not Encountered AT END OF DRILLING --- Not Encountered AFTER DRILLING --- Not Encountered with Cave -In Depth of 13 feet uj o z A SPT N VALUE A a H of U) ? 20 40 60 80 Lm Lo �z� of _j�Q L w PL MC LL J� > o 5 O- m O> M z 20 40 60 80 z U z Lu o ❑ FINES CONTENT (%) ❑ 2 20 40 60 80 AU 1 - (SP) Poorly Graded Sand, fine to medium grained, trace Gravel, brown, moist, medium dense. (Glacial Outwash) 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 (SP) Poorly Graded Sand, fine to coarse grained, with Gravel brown, moist, loose. (Glacial Outwash) SS 2 5-6-7 (13) SS 4-8-10 3 (18) SS 7-10-14 4 (24) SS 3-5-5 5 (10) (SP) Poorly Graded Sand, fine to medium grained, trace Gravel, brown, moist, loose. (Glacial Outwash) SS 6 Bottom of borehole at 16.0 feet. 2-4-5 (9) SS 2-4-4 7 (8) A AUG(3 Haugo GeoTechnical Services 2825 Cedar Ave Minneapolis, MN 554057 Telephone: 612-729-2959 BORING NUMBER SB -2 PAGE 1 OF 1 CLIENT Spaeth Masonry PROJECT NAME Spaeth Industrial Park PROJECT NUMBER 17-0518 PROJECT LOCATION Monticello, MN DATE STARTED 6/5/17 COMPLETED 6/5/17 GROUND ELEVATION 962.9 ft HOLE SIZE 3 1/4 inches DRILLING CONTRACTOR HGTS GROUND WATER LEVELS: DRILLING METHOD Hollow Stem Auger/Split Spoon AT TIME OF DRILLING --- Not Encountered LOGGED BY MS CHECKED BY JC AT END OF DRILLING --- Not Encountered NOTES AFTER DRILLING --- Not Encountered with Cave -In Depth of 11 feet w o z A SPT N VALUE A U o U) w 20 40 60 80 =O O MATERIAL DESCRIPTION _ ~m LU J > a �z� O Q w^ w PL MC LL R o � ��� LuJ g o O- z m 0> M z 20 40 60 80 CD z U z < Lu o ❑ FINES CONTENT (%) ❑ 0.0 2 20 40 60 80 Silty Sand, black, moist. (Topsoil) 1[8 - - (SP) Poorly Graded Sand, fine to medium grained, trace Gravel, i- - brown, moist, loose to medium dense. (Glacial Outwash) 2.5 9 - - (0) s 5.0 SS 7-10-10 10 (20) i 7.5 i SS 7-10-11 11 (21) 10.0 SS 5-6-7 _ _ i \ 12 (13) 12.5 SS 4-8-12 13 (20) 15.0 ' SS 3-5-6 14 (11) i Bottom of borehole at 16.0 feet. AUG(3 Haugo GeoTechnical Services 2825 Cedar Ave Minneapolis, MN 554057 Telephone: 612-729-2959 CLIENT Spaeth Masonry PROJECT NUMBER 17-0518 DATE STARTED 6/5/17 COMPLETED 6/5/17 DRILLING CONTRACTOR HGTS DRILLING METHOD Hollow Stem Auger/Split Spoon LOGGED BY MS CHECKED BY JC NOTES BORING NUMBER SB -3 PAGE 1 OF 1 PROJECT NAME Spaeth Industrial Park PROJECT LOCATION Monticello, MN GROUND ELEVATION 961.4 ft HOLE SIZE 3 1/4 inches GROUND WATER LEVELS: AT TIME OF DRILLING --- Not Encountered AT END OF DRILLING --- Not Encountered AFTER DRILLING --- Not Encountered with Cave -In Depth of 12 feet uj a o z A SPT N VALUE A O U =O of CO > _ LU U) w �z� U w^ w 20 PL 40 60 80 MC LL 0_0 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION J g > O O Z Q W o J o S - 0—of m 0> 5 z 20 40 60 80 CD z U z < Lu o ❑ FINES CONTENT (%) ❑ 0.0 2 20 40 60 80 Poorly Graded Sand with Silt, fine to medium grained, trace - Gravel, grey, moist. (FILL) AU 15 — - Silty Sand, black, moist. (Topsoil) (SP -SM) Poorly Graded Sand with Silt, fine to medium grained, 2.5_ trace Gravel, brown, moist, loose. (Glacial Outwash) SS 2-3-4 16 (7) s 5.0 SS 2-2-3 17 (5) i (SP) Poorly Graded Sand, fine to medium grained, trace Gravel, 7 5 brown, moist, medium dense. (Glacial Outwash) SS 5-10-8 i 18 (18) 10.0 SS 8-10-8 i 19 (18) 12.5 SS 4-6-8 20 (14) i- 15.0 ' SS 3-5-7 21 (12) i Bottom of borehole at 16.0 feet. AUGD Haugo GeoTechnical Services 2825 Cedar Ave Minneapolis, MN 554057 Telephone: 612-729-2959 CLIENT Spaeth Masonry PROJECT NUMBER 17-0518 DATE STARTED 6/5/17 COMPLETED 6/5/17 DRILLING CONTRACTOR HGTS DRILLING METHOD Hollow Stem Auger/Split Spoon LOGGED BY MS CHECKED BY JC NOTES U 2 Lu CL O MATERIAL DESCRIPTION CD c9 0.0 Silty Sand, black, moist. (Topsoil) BORING NUMBER SB -4 PAGE 1 OF 1 PROJECT NAME Spaeth Industrial Park PROJECT LOCATION Monticello, MN GROUND ELEVATION 961.6 ft HOLE SIZE 3 1/4 inches GROUND WATER LEVELS: AT TIME OF DRILLING --- Not Encountered AT END OF DRILLING --- Not Encountered AFTER DRILLING --- Not Encountered with Cave -In Depth of 17 feet uj o z A SPT N VALUE A a H of U) ? 20 40 60 80 Lm Lo �z� of _j�Q L w PL MC LL J� > o 5 O- m O> M z 20 40 60 80 z U z Lu o ❑ FINES CONTENT (%) ❑ 23 (13) 2 20 40 60 80 AU 22 4 (SP) Poorly Graded Sand, fine to medium grained, trace Gravel, - - with Cobbles at 10 feet, brown, moist, medium dense to dense. (Glacial Outwash) 2.5 23 (13) s 5.0 SS 5-10-12 24 (22) i 7.5 SS 12-16-15 25 (31) 10.0 SS 4-7-10 i i 26 (17) i 12.5 SS 3-5-8 27 (13) 15.0 ' SS 4-7-7 28 (14) i Bottom of borehole at 16.0 feet. 4 AUGD Haugo GeoTechnical Services 2825 Cedar Ave Minneapolis, MN 554057 Telephone: 612-729-2959 CLIENT Spaeth Masonry PROJECT NUMBER 17-0518 DATE STARTED 6/5/17 COMPLETED 6/5/17 DRILLING CONTRACTOR HGTS DRILLING METHOD Hollow Stem Auger/Split Spoon LOGGED BY MS CHECKED BY JC NOTES U 2 Lu CL O MATERIAL DESCRIPTION CD c9 0.0 Silty Sand, black, moist. (Topsoil) BORING NUMBER SB -5 PAGE 1 OF 1 PROJECT NAME Spaeth Industrial Park PROJECT LOCATION Monticello, MN GROUND ELEVATION 961.6 ft HOLE SIZE 3 1/4 inches GROUND WATER LEVELS: AT TIME OF DRILLING --- Not Encountered AT END OF DRILLING --- Not Encountered AFTER DRILLING --- Not Encountered with Cave -In Depth of 12 feet uj o z A SPT N VALUE A a H of U) ? 20 40 60 80 Lm Lo �z� of _j�Q L w PL MC LL J� > o 5 O- m O> M z 20 40 60 80 z U z 3-8-7 Lu o ❑ FINES CONTENT (%) ❑ 30 (15) 2 20 40 60 80 s 5.0 AU 29 (SP) Poorly Graded Sand, fine to coarse grained, trace Gravel, - - brown, moist, medium dense. (Glacial Outwash) 2.5 SS 3-8-7 A 30 (15) s 5.0 SS 6-8-9 31 (17) i (SP) Poorly Graded Sand, fine to medium grained, trace Gravel, 7 5 i brown, moist, medium dense. (Glacial Outwash) SS 6-8-6 32 (14) A 10.0 SS 5-7-7 i 33 (14) (SP) Poorly Graded Sand, fine to coarse grained, trace Gravel, 12.5 1 brown, moist, medium dense. (Glacial Outwash) SS 3-5-8 34 7 5 (13) (SP) Poorly Graded Sand, fine to medium grained, trace Gravel, - - i brown, moist, medium dense. (Glacial Outwash) -- 15.0 ' SS 3-6-7 35 (13) i Bottom of borehole at 16.0 feet. AUG(3 Haugo GeoTechnical Services 2825 Cedar Ave Minneapolis, MN 554057 Telephone: 612-729-2959 BORING NUMBER SB -6 PAGE 1 OF 1 CLIENT Spaeth Masonry PROJECT NAME Spaeth Industrial Park PROJECT NUMBER 17-0518 PROJECT LOCATION Monticello, MN DATE STARTED 6/5/17 COMPLETED 6/5/17 GROUND ELEVATION 962.5 ft HOLE SIZE 3 1/4 inches DRILLING CONTRACTOR HGTS GROUND WATER LEVELS: DRILLING METHOD Hollow Stem Auger/Split Spoon AT TIME OF DRILLING --- Not Encountered LOGGED BY MS CHECKED BY JC AT END OF DRILLING --- Not Encountered NOTES AFTER DRILLING --- Not Encountered with Cave -In Depth of 10 feet w o z A SPT N VALUE A U o U) w 20 40 60 80 =O O MATERIAL DESCRIPTION _ ~m LU J > a �z� w^ w O Q R o � PL MC LL ��� Lu J g o_� O- z m0> Mz 20 40 60 80 c7 z U z < Lu o ❑ FINES CONTENT (%) ❑ 0.0 2 20 40 60 80 Silty Sand, black, moist. (Topsoil) AU 36 (SP) Poorly Graded Sand, fine to medium grained, trace Gravel, - - brown, moist, medium dense. (Glacial Outwash) 2.5 SS 5-7-9 37 (16) 5.0 SS 5-12-12 _ _ 38 (24) 7.5 SS 13-12-10 _ _ 39 (22) 10.0 SS 15-10-11 40 (21) 12.5 SS 7-10-8 41 (18) 15.0 SS 4-7-8 5 42 (15) Bottom of borehole at 16.0 feet. 0 d T O L O — S w c O O O O O N r N Y C E u N L y N W 3 O � L 2 N > > N v L @ U O ALL. I m y c y o 0 0 E a 0 o F E E c M O d C D L 0 f7 p F 0 i y V A A 1 N M N M O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O .. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 •� C � ; NC M 07 A A O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O- C t M t0 A O N M O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O r U d C = C O t c E C > Ci o a :5uZ �_ 0 0 3 4 LL a O M O M O M O M O M O M O M O M O M O M O M O M O M O M O M O M O M O M O M O M O M O M O M O M .O LL '� c0 c0 c0 c0 c0 c0 c0 c0 c0 c0 c0 c0 c0 c0 c0 c0 c0 c0 c0 c0 c0 c0 c0 c0 L C O q J W J u s o d N' c a N F^ E o m uoi w uoi m c o M C LL C m yL+ m W N > c N U1 rn c � y a C � @ O C o 0 0 0 y 3 0 0 0 0 C 'Q LL M N N N c @ d -i 00 o rn E @ c @ c @ c @ c @ c @ c @ c @ c @ c @ c @ c @ c @ c @ c @ c @ c @ c @ c @ c @ c @ c @ c @ c @ c c u c m 'v � c v d C N lU O lU lU ................... O ..................... d F � N 7 y o a m J U c 3 O ° m Z E� M oibioibim000 M O O m °f O U N .@. K @ °J��' ° 3 dG 00000000 A V7 ❑ N tD N t0 N t0 N tD O.. .� L N N F > u ig y F~ F~ F~ F~ F~ F~ F~ F~ F~ F~ F~ F~ F~ F~ F~ F~ F~ F~ F~ F~ F~ F~ F~ F F a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a c y v U) W U) W U) W U) W U) W U) W y (n W y (n W y U) W y A W y A W y A W y (n W y N W y N W y N W y N W y N W y N W y N W y N W y N W y N W y N W y M W 9 p O O J IO N d > O L @ d N M a N l0 A W A N M V u1 d A O N N N N N N LL d y � a`w c ■ SERVICES Criteria for Assigning Group Symbols and Group Names Using Laboratory Tests a m Gravels MH More than 50% of .c coarse -fraction a a', retained on c No. 4 sieve 0 GG a,Zri, N Sands m 6 50% or more of iz 0 0 LO coarse fraction v o passes L No. 4 sieve m Group MH Silts and Clays o m m Liquid limit Co m m less than 50 Poorly graded gravel' GM c � o 6O GG N Cn E Silts and clays `o z Liquid limit iz 0 0 LO 50 or more Highly Organic Soils Clean Gravers I G;�t 4 and 1< C< 3 c 5°a or less fines<4 and/or 1 >cC�>3 c Gravels with Fines Fines classify as ML or MH More than 12% fines a Fines classify as CL or CH Clean Sands ( C„> 6 and 1 < C� <3c 5% or less fines ' C,< 6 and/or 1 > Cc> 3 c Sands with Fines Fines classify as ML or MH r More than €12°%' Fines classify as CL or CH inorganic € Pt > 7 and plots on or above `A" line PI < 4 or plots below "A' line' Organic Liquid limit - oven dried < 0.75 Liquid limit - not dried inorganic P1 plots on or above "A" line PI plots below "A" line Organic Liquid limit - oven dried < 0.75 Liquid limit - not dried Primarily organic matter, dark in color and organic odor Descriptive Terminology of Soil Standard D 2487 - 00 Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes (Unified Soil Classification System) Soils Classification Group MH Symbol Group Naive b GW Well -graded gravel GP Poorly graded gravel' GM Silty gravel df? GG Clayey gravel 1151 SW Well -graded sand" SP Poorly graded sand " SM Silty sand'9" SC Clayey sand''' CL Lean clay " ML Silt " ' , OL Organic clay ' OL Organic slit k a, Based on the material passing the 3 -in (75mm ) sieve. b. If field sample contained cobbles or boulders, or both. add `with cobbles or boulders or both' to croup name, c G = C3�1 D o C� = (D.)' D,, x D. d r soil contains>15 % sand, add `with sand' to group name. _ e Gravels with 5 to 12% Fines require dual symbols-. GWGM well -graded gravel with silt GW -GC well -graded gravel with clay GP -GM poorly graded gravel with silt GP -GG poorly graded gravel wilhl�lay f. If fines classify as CL -ML. use dual symbol GC -GM or SC -SM. g. If fines are organic, add `with organic Bnes'to group name. h. If soil contains Z 15% gravel. add "with gravel' to group name, i- Sands with 5 to 12% fines require dual symbols: SVV-SM well -graded sand with silt SW -SC well -graded sand with clay SP -SM poorly graded sand wlh silt SP -SC poorly graded sand with clay I- IfAtterberg limits plot in hatched area. soil is a CL -ML. silty clay. k It soil contains 10 to 29% plus No. 200, add -with sand' or "with graver whichever is predum inant. I- It sol contains�tW%plus No. 200, predominantly sand.. add "sandy'ta group name. m. It soil contains> 30% plus No. 200 predominantly gravel, add gravelly to group name, n. PI Z 4 and plots on or above 'A' fine. o. PI C 4 or plots below "A' line p. PI plots on or above "A" Eine. q. PI plots below "A' line 60 ZV 50 - o.41 40 - X 0 � 30 Zcl,-MH r OH 10 - , 7 - ML or OL 4 GL -r ML 0 I I 0 10 16 20 30 40 5o 60 70 80 90 100 110 CH Fat clay K ' m MH Elastic silt"'' OH Organic clay "' in, o OH Organic silt PT Peat Liquid Limit (LL) Particle Size Identification Boulders ............................... over 12" Laboratory Tests DD Dry density, pct OC Organic content. % WD Wet density, pcf S Percent of saturation. °o MC Natural moisture content, °% SG 5pecificgravity LL Ligiuid limit. % C Cohesion, psf PL Plastic limit_ % 0 Angle of internal friction PI Plasticity index. °% qu Unconfined compressive strength. psf P200 % passing 200 sieve qp Pocket penetrometer strength, tsf Particle Size Identification Boulders ............................... over 12" Cobbles --.-'----'------------- ----- - 3" to 12" Gravel edium......_........................... Medium.. ... . . Coarse ............................ 314" to 3" Fine ..--.----'---- ---------------- No_ 4 to 314" Sand Very stiff ................................... Coarse ....................:....... No. 4 to No. 10 Medium ........................... No 10 to No 40 Fine ................................. No. 40 to No. 200 Silt ....................................... No. 200, P!< 4 or below "A" line Cray ---------- ------ ------------------<No. 200, PI>4 and on or above "A` line Relative Density of Cohesionless Soils Very loose ................................ 0 to 4 BPF Loose -`------------ - - - - 5 to 10 BPF Medium dense ............. . .... 11 to 30 BPF Dense ...................................... 31 to 50 BPF Very dense ............................... over 50 BPF Consistency of Cohesive Soils Very soft -------- ------- ------ ------ ---' -- _ 0 to 1 BPF Soft ....................... ............... 2 to 3 BPF Rather soft ............................... 4 to 5 BPF edium......_........................... Medium.. ... . . 6 to a BPF Rather stiff ............. .................. 9 to 12 BPF Stiff --------------------------------------- 13 to 16 BPF Very stiff ................................... 17 to 30 BPF Hard ....................................... over 30 BPF Drilling Notes Standard penetration test borings were advanced by 3 114' or 6 114" ID hollow -stem augers unless noted otherwise; Jetting water was used to clean out auger prior to sampling only where indicated on logs. Standard penetration test borings are designated by the prefix "ST" (Split Tube). All samples were taken with the standard 2" OD split -tube sampler, except where noted Powerauger borings were advanced by 4" or 6" diameter continuous- fiight, solid -stem augers. Soil classifications and strata depths were in- ferred from disturbed samples augered to the surface and are, therefore. somewhat approximate- Power auger borings are designated by the prefix "B." Hand auger borings were advanced manually with a 1 112' of 3 114" diameter auger and were limited to the depth from which the auger could be manually withdrawn. Hand auger borings are indicated by the prefix H BPF: Numbers indicate blows per foot recorded in standard penetration test, also known as "N" value. The sampler was set 6" into undisturbed soil below the hollow -stem auger. Driving resistances were then counted for second and third 6" increments and added to get BPF. Where they differed significantly. they are reported in the following form, 2112 for the second and third 6" increments, respectively. WH: WH indicates the sampler penetrated soil under weight of hammer and rods atone; driving not required. WR: WR indicates the sampler penetrated soil under weight of rods atone; hammer weight and driving not required. TVV indicates thin-walled (undisturbed) tube sample. Note: Alf tests were run in general accordance with applicable ASTM standards. Rev 7107 Spaeth Industrial Park Site Improvement Project 108 Dundas Road Monticello, MN STORM SEWER PIPE SIZE ANALYSIS Prenared for: Ken Spaeth 108 Meadowlake Road SE St. Michael, MN 55376 Phone: (612) 889-3100 spaethmasonry@gmail.com Prepared bv: Civil Engineering Site Design PO Box 566 118 East Broadway St. Monticello, MN 55362 Contact: Scott Dahlke. Phone: (763) 314-0929 sdahlke@civilesd.com July 03, 2017 CESD Project # 00633 TABLE OF CONTENTS Narrative - Proposed Project - Site Location - Requirements - Summary - Certification Pipe Size Calculation Tabulation (Rational Method) - Model results generated by AutoCAD Sanitary and Storm Analysis for 10 yr rainfall event based on ATLAS 14 data Pipe Size Drainage Areas - AutoCAD Sanitary and Storm Analysis printed graphic - Pipe Size Drainage Areas Map Spaeth Industrial Park, Monticello, MN Pipe Size Analysis Page 2 NARRATIVE PROPOSED PROJECT: The project proposes site improvements for multiple small industrial buildings. Site improvements include new buildings, pavement, utilities, and associated items. The project proposes collection of impervious surface drainage with storm sewer routed to a combination of an on-site stormwater management basin, and on-site storm sewer configured to function as an underground infiltration system, with overflow storm water routed to existing roadside ditch of Dundas Road. Stormwater in Dundas Road roadside ditch ultimately drains to an existing city regional storm water management pond located off-site. SITE LOCATION: The site address is 108 Dundas Road in the City of Monticello, MN. The project is in the SW 1/4 of the NE1/4, Section 14, Township 121, Range 25, Wright County, MN. Access to the site can be achieved from Dundas Road along the north boundary. REQUIREMENTS: Stormwater management design for the project is subject to review by the City of Monticello. Pipe size analysis for on-site storm drainage is required. According to the Monticello regulations, the goal for the pipe size design is to control storm water runoff for the 10 -year storm event using ATLAS 14 rainfall data. SUMMARY: The attached pipe size calculation tabulations propose to satisfy the City of Monticello requirements. IN 21 A 0 1 a WIN 0 Is] ki F I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 07/03/2017 Scott Dahlke, P.E. Date Spaeth Industrial Park, Monticello, MN Pipe Size Analysis Page 3 Spaeth Industrial Park Monticello, MN Project Description Site Development Project File Name............................................................................. 00633 SPS Analysis 2017-07-03 plans.SPF Description............................................................................ Spaeth Industrial Park, Monticello Project Options FlowUnits............................................................................. CFS ElevationType...................................................................... Elevation Hydrology Method................................................................. Rational Time of Concentration (TOC) Method .................................. User -Defined Link Routing Method............................................................. Kinematic Wave Enable Overflow Ponding at Nodes ...................................... YES Skip Steady State Analysis Time Periods ............................ NO Analysis Options Start Analysis On.................................................................. Jul 03, 2017 00:00:00 End Analysis On................................................................... Jul 04, 2017 00:00:00 Start Reporting On................................................................ Jul 03, 2017 00:00:00 Antecedent Dry Days............................................................ 0 days Runoff (Dry Weather) Time Step .......................................... 0 01:00:00 days hh:mm:ss Runoff (Wet Weather) Time Step ........................................ 0 00:05:00 days hh:mm:ss Reporting Time Step............................................................ 0 00:05:00 days hh:mm:ss Routing Time Step................................................................ 30 seconds Number of Elements Rainfall Details Return Period........................................................................ 10 year(s) 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 Qty RainGages........................................................................... 0 Su b b a s i n s.............................................................................. 26 Nodes.................................................................................... 24 Junctions...................................................................... 22 Ouffalls......................................................................... 1 FlowDiversions........................................................... 0 Inlets............................................................................ 0 Storage Nodes............................................................. 1 Links...................................................................................... 23 Channels...................................................................... 0 Pipes............................................................................ 23 Pumps.......................................................................... 0 Orifices......................................................................... 0 Weirs............................................................................ 0 Outlets.......................................................................... 0 Pollutants.............................................................................. 0 LandUses............................................................................ 0 Rainfall Details Return Period........................................................................ 10 year(s) 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 Spaeth Industrial Park Monticello, MN Subbasin Summary Site Development Project SN Subbasin Area Weighted Total Total Total Peak Time of ID Runoff Rainfall Runoff Runoff Runoff Concentration Coefficient Volume 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 (a0.00 (daYs0 1 OffsiteToBasin 745.02 0.0500 0.93 0.05 O.V j0.24 00:10:00 2 OffsiteToCB07 37223.98 0.0500 0.93 0.05 0.04 0 00:10:00 3 OffsiteToCB09 3610.99 0.0500 0.93 0.05 0.00 0.02 0 00:10:00 4 OffsiteToCB11 7978.01 0.3500 0.93 0.33 0.06 0.36 0 00:10:00 5 OffsiteToCB13 26374.01 0.5800 0.93 0.54 0.33 1.97 0 00:10:00 6 OffsiteToCB15 37993.99 0.0500 0.93 0.05 0.04 0.24 0 00:10:00 7 toBasin 17818.00 0.0500 0.93 0.05 0.02 0.12 0 00:10:00 8 toCB01 2426.99 0.7000 0.93 0.65 0.04 0.22 0 00:10:00 9 toCB02 9701.99 0.7700 0.93 0.72 0.16 0.96 0 00:10:00 10 toCB03 10509.98 0.7300 0.93 0.68 0.16 0.99 0 00:10:00 11 toCB04 92113.02 0.7800 0.93 0.73 1.54 9.24 0 00:10:00 12 toCB05 7853.00 0.7100 0.93 0.66 0.12 0.72 0 00:10:00 13 toCB06 9624.02 0.8000 0.93 0.75 0.17 0.99 0 00:10:00 14 toCB07 8260.98 0.6800 0.93 0.64 0.12 0.72 0 00:10:00 15 toCB08 19762.00 0.7900 0.93 0.74 0.33 2.01 0 00:10:00 16 toCB09 2941.00 0.6200 0.93 0.58 0.04 0.24 0 00:10:00 17 toCB10 17209.99 0.8500 0.93 0.79 0.31 1.88 0 00:10:00 18 toCB11 10325.99 0.7300 0.93 0.68 0.16 0.97 0 00:10:00 19 toCB12 20571.99 0.8000 0.93 0.75 0.35 2.12 0 00:10:00 20 toCB13 11111.98 0.6900 0.93 0.64 0.16 0.99 0 00:10:00 21 toCB14 17209.99 0.8500 0.93 0.79 0.31 1.88 0 00:10:00 22 toCB15 9786.02 0.7400 0.93 0.69 0.16 0.93 0 00:10:00 23 toCB16 689.99 0.0500 0.93 0.05 0.00 0.00 0 00:10:00 24 toCB17 689.99 0.0500 0.93 0.05 0.00 0.00 0 00:10:00 25 toCB18 689.99 0.0500 0.93 0.05 0.00 0.00 0 00:10:00 26 toCB19 689.99 0.0500 0.93 0.05 0.00 0.00 0 00:10:00 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 Link Summary Spaeth Industrial Park Monticello, MN Site Development Project SN Element Element From To (Outlet) Length Inlet Outlet Average Diameter or Manning's Peak Design Flow Peak Flow/ Peak Flow Peak Flow Peak Flow Total Time Reported ID Type (Inlet) Node Invert Invert Slope Height Roughness Flow Capacity Design Flow Velocity Depth Depth/ Surcharged Condition Node Elevation Elevation Ratio Total Depth Ratio (ft) (ft) (ft) N (in) (cfs) (cfs) (fUsec) (ft) (min) 1 BasintoFES-B Pipe Basin FES -B 141.04 956.00 958.50 -1.7700 0.000 0.0150 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 CB01toFESA Pipe CB -01 FES -A 18.00 958.00 958.00 0.0000 15.000 0.0130 0.52 0.48 1.08 0.47 1.25 1.00 43.00 SURCHARGED 3 CB02toCB01 Pipe CB -02 CB -01 148.00 956.50 956.50 0.0000 36.000 0.0130 1.88 1.73 1.08 0.36 3.00 1.00 15.00 SURCHARGED 4 CB03toCB02 Pipe CB -03 CB -02 136.00 956.50 956.50 0.0000 36.000 0.0130 1.96 1.81 1.08 0.38 3.00 1.00 12.00 SURCHARGED 5 CB04toCB03 Pipe CB -04 CB -03 136.00 956.50 956.50 0.0000 36.000 0.0130 1.96 1.81 1.08 0.43 3.00 1.00 12.00 SURCHARGED 6 CB05toCB04 Pipe CB -05 CB -04 152.00 956.50 956.50 0.0000 36.000 0.0130 0.52 1.71 0.31 0.56 1.03 0.34 0.00 Calculated 7 CB07toFES-C Pipe CB -07 FES -D 16.00 957.00 957.00 0.0000 15.000 0.0130 0.55 0.51 1.08 0.55 1.25 1.00 18.00 SURCHARGED 8 CB08toCB01 Pipe CB -08 CB -01 144.00 957.70 957.40 0.2100 12.000 0.0130 1.76 1.63 1.08 2.55 1.00 1.00 4.00 SURCHARGED 9 CB08toFES-C Pipe CB -06 FES -C 15.00 957.50 957.50 0.0000 12.000 0.0130 0.31 0.29 1.08 0.67 1.00 1.00 13.00 SURCHARGED 10 CB09toCB08 Pipe CB -09 CB -08 144.00 958.00 957.70 0.2100 12.000 0.0130 0.25 1.63 0.15 2.67 0.26 0.26 0.00 Calculated 11 CB10toCB02 Pipe CB -10 CB -02 144.00 958.70 958.40 0.2100 12.000 0.0130 1.76 1.63 1.08 4.01 0.94 0.94 0.00 > CAPACITY 12 CB11toCB13 Pipe CB -11 CB -13 136.00 958.20 957.90 0.2200 12.000 0.0130 1.29 1.67 0.77 3.79 0.66 0.66 0.00 Calculated 13 CB12toCB03 Pipe CB -12 CB -03 144.00 957.60 957.30 0.2100 12.000 0.0130 1.76 1.63 1.08 3.63 1.00 1.00 3.00 SURCHARGED 14 CB13toCB15 Pipe CB -13 CB -15 136.00 957.90 957.60 0.2200 15.000 0.0130 3.28 3.03 1.08 3.02 1.25 1.00 4.00 SURCHARGED 15 CB14toCB15 Pipe CB -14 CB -15 144.00 958.70 957.60 0.7600 12.000 0.0130 1.85 3.11 0.60 5.92 0.55 0.55 0.00 Calculated 16 CB15toCB07 Pipe CB -15 CB -07 151.00 957.40 957.00 0.2600 18.000 0.0130 5.85 5.41 1.08 3.63 1.42 0.94 0.00 > CAPACITY 17 CB16toCB08 Pipe CB -16 CB -08 86.00 959.00 958.00 1.1600 12.000 0.0130 0.00 3.84 0.00 0.83 0.03 0.03 0.00 Calculated 18 CB17toCB12 Pipe CB -17 CB -12 74.00 959.00 957.60 1.8900 12.000 0.0130 0.00 4.90 0.00 0.98 0.02 0.02 0.00 Calculated 19 CB18toCB12 Pipe CB -18 CB -12 74.00 959.00 957.60 1.8900 12.000 0.0130 0.00 4.90 0.00 0.98 0.02 0.02 0.00 Calculated 20 CB19toCB06 Pipe CB -19 CB -06 86.00 959.00 958.00 1.1600 12.000 0.0130 0.00 3.84 0.00 0.83 0.03 0.03 0.00 Calculated 21 FES-BtoCB05 Pipe FES -B CB -05 12.00 958.50 958.50 0.0000 18.000 0.0130 0.00 0.96 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Calculated 22 FES-CtoBasin Pipe FES -C Basin 38.82 957.50 956.00 3.8600 0.000 0.0150 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Calculated 23 FES-DtoBasin Pipe FES -D Basin 96.11 957.00 956.00 1.0400 0.000 0.0150 0.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Calculated 0710312017 CESD No. 00633 Spaeth Industrial Park Monticello, MN Subbasin Hydrology Site Development Project Subbasin : OffsiteToBasin Input Data Area (ft') ....................................................... 745.01 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.0500 Runoff Coefficient Subbasin Runoff Results Total Rainfall (in) .......................................... 0.93 Total Runoff (in) ............................................ 0.05 Peak Runoff (cfs)......................................... 0.01 Rainfall Intensity ........................................... 5.604 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.0500 Time of Concentration (days hh:mm:ss) ...... 0 00:10:00 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 Area Soil Runoff Soil/Surface Description (ft') Group Coeff. Impervious 0.00 A (0-2%) 0.85 Pervious 745.01 A (0-2%) 0.05 Composite Area & Weighted Runoff Coeff. 745.01 0.05 Subbasin Runoff Results Total Rainfall (in) .......................................... 0.93 Total Runoff (in) ............................................ 0.05 Peak Runoff (cfs)......................................... 0.01 Rainfall Intensity ........................................... 5.604 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.0500 Time of Concentration (days hh:mm:ss) ...... 0 00:10:00 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 Spaeth Industrial Park Monticello, MN Subbasin : OffsiteToCB07 Site Development Project Input Data Area (ft2)....................................................... 37223.98 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.0500 Runoff Coefficient Area Soil Runoff Soil/Surface Description (ft') Group Coeff. Impervious 0.00 A (0-2%) 0.85 Pervious 37223.98 A (0-2%) 0.05 Composite Area & Weighted Runoff Coeff. 37223.98 0.05 Subbasin Runoff Results Total Rainfall (in).......................................... 0.93 Total Runoff (in)............................................ 0.05 Peak Runoff (cfs)......................................... 0.24 Rainfall Intensity........................................... 5.604 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.0500 Time of Concentration (days hh:mm:ss) ...... 0 00:10:00 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 Spaeth Industrial Park Monticello, MN Subbasin : OffsiteToCB09 Site Development Project Input Data Area (ft2)....................................................... 3610.99 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.0500 Runoff Coefficient Area Soil Runoff Soil/Surface Description (ft') Group Coeff. Impervious 0.00 A (0-2%) 0.85 Pervious 3610.99 A (0-2%) 0.05 Composite Area & Weighted Runoff Coeff. 3610.99 0.05 Subbasin Runoff Results Total Rainfall (in).......................................... 0.93 Total Runoff (in)............................................ 0.05 Peak Runoff (cfs)......................................... 0.02 Rainfall Intensity........................................... 5.604 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.0500 Time of Concentration (days hh:mm:ss) ...... 0 00:10:00 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 Spaeth Industrial Park Monticello, MN Subbasin : OffsiteToCB11 Site Development Project Input Data Area (ft2)....................................................... 7978.01 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.3500 Runoff Coefficient Area Soil Runoff Soil/Surface Description (ft') Group Coeff. Impervious 3298.01 A (0-2%) 0.85 4680.00 - 0.00 Composite Area & Weighted Runoff Coeff. 7978.01 0.35 Subbasin Runoff Results Total Rainfall (in).......................................... 0.93 Total Runoff (in)............................................ 0.33 Peak Runoff (cfs)......................................... 0.36 Rainfall Intensity........................................... 5.604 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.3500 Time of Concentration (days hh:mm:ss) ...... 0 00:10:00 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 Spaeth Industrial Park Monticello, MN Subbasin : OffsiteToCB13 Site Development Project Input Data Area (ft2)....................................................... 26374.01 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.5800 Runoff Coefficient Area Soil Runoff Soil/Surface Description (ft') Group Coeff. Impervious 17588.00 A (0-2%) 0.85 Pervious 8786.01 A (0-2%) 0.05 Composite Area & Weighted Runoff Coeff. 26374.01 0.58 Subbasin Runoff Results Total Rainfall (in).......................................... 0.93 Total Runoff (in)............................................ 0.54 Peak Runoff (cfs)......................................... 1.97 Rainfall Intensity........................................... 5.604 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.5800 Time of Concentration (days hh:mm:ss) ...... 0 00:10:00 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 Spaeth Industrial Park Monticello, MN Subbasin : OffsiteToCB15 Site Development Project Input Data Area (ft2)....................................................... 37993.99 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.0500 Runoff Coefficient Area Soil Runoff Soil/Surface Description (ft') Group Coeff. Impervious 0.00 A (0-2%) 0.85 Pervious 37993.99 A (0-2%) 0.05 Composite Area & Weighted Runoff Coeff. 37993.99 0.05 Subbasin Runoff Results Total Rainfall (in).......................................... 0.93 Total Runoff (in)............................................ 0.05 Peak Runoff (cfs)......................................... 0.24 Rainfall Intensity........................................... 5.604 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.0500 Time of Concentration (days hh:mm:ss) ...... 0 00:10:00 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 Spaeth Industrial Park Monticello, MN Subbasin : toBasin Site Development Project Input Data Area (ft') ....................................................... 17818.00 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.0500 Runoff Coefficient Area Soil Runoff Soil/Surface Description (ft') Group Coeff. Impervious 0.00 A (0-2%) 0.85 Pervious 17818.00 A (0-2%) 0.05 Composite Area & Weighted Runoff Coeff. 17818.00 0.05 Subbasin Runoff Results Total Rainfall (in).......................................... 0.93 Total Runoff (in)............................................ 0.05 Peak Runoff (cfs)......................................... 0.12 Rainfall Intensity........................................... 5.604 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.0500 Time of Concentration (days hh:mm:ss) ...... 0 00:10:00 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 Spaeth Industrial Park Monticello, MN Subbasin : toCB01 Site Development Project Input Data Area (ft2)....................................................... 2426.99 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.7000 Runoff Coefficient Area Soil Runoff Soil/Surface Description (ft') Group Coeff. Impervious 1957.98 A (0-2%) 0.85 Pervious 469.01 A (0-2%) 0.05 Composite Area & Weighted Runoff Coeff. 2426.99 0.70 Subbasin Runoff Results Total Rainfall (in).......................................... 0.93 Total Runoff (in)............................................ 0.65 Peak Runoff (cfs)......................................... 0.22 Rainfall Intensity........................................... 5.604 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.7000 Time of Concentration (days hh:mm:ss) ...... 0 00:10:00 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 Spaeth Industrial Park Monticello, MN Subbasin : toCB02 Site Development Project Input Data Area (ft2)....................................................... 9701.99 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.7700 Runoff Coefficient Area Soil Runoff Soil/Surface Description (ft') Group Coeff. Impervious 8762.01 A (0-2%) 0.85 Pervious 939.98 A (0-2%) 0.05 Composite Area & Weighted Runoff Coeff. 9701.99 0.77 Subbasin Runoff Results Total Rainfall (in).......................................... 0.93 Total Runoff (in)............................................ 0.72 Peak Runoff (cfs)......................................... 0.96 Rainfall Intensity........................................... 5.604 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.7700 Time of Concentration (days hh:mm:ss) ...... 0 00:10:00 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 Spaeth Industrial Park Monticello, MN Subbasin : toCB03 Site Development Project Input Data Area (ft2)....................................................... 10509.98 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.7300 Runoff Coefficient Area Soil Runoff Soil/Surface Description (ft') Group Coeff. Impervious 8934.98 A (0-2%) 0.85 Pervious 1575.00 A (0-2%) 0.05 Composite Area & Weighted Runoff Coeff. 10509.98 0.73 Subbasin Runoff Results Total Rainfall (in).......................................... 0.93 Total Runoff (in)............................................ 0.68 Peak Runoff (cfs)......................................... 0.99 Rainfall Intensity........................................... 5.604 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.7300 Time of Concentration (days hh:mm:ss) ...... 0 00:10:00 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 Spaeth Industrial Park Monticello, MN Subbasin : toCB04 Site Development Project Input Data Area (ft2)....................................................... 92113.02 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.7800 Runoff Coefficient Area Soil Runoff Soil/Surface Description (ft') Group Coeff. Impervious 8439.01 A (0-2%) 0.85 Pervious 774.02 A (0-2%) 0.05 Composite Area & Weighted Runoff Coeff. 9213.03 0.78 Subbasin Runoff Results Total Rainfall (in).......................................... 0.93 Total Runoff (in)............................................ 0.73 Peak Runoff (cfs)......................................... 9.24 Rainfall Intensity........................................... 5.604 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.7800 Time of Concentration (days hh:mm:ss) ...... 0 00:10:00 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 Spaeth Industrial Park Monticello, MN Subbasin : toCB05 Site Development Project Input Data Area (ft2)....................................................... 7853.00 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.7100 Runoff Coefficient Area Soil Runoff Soil/Surface Description (ft') Group Coeff. Impervious 6501.98 A (0-2%) 0.85 Pervious 1351.01 A (0-2%) 0.05 Composite Area & Weighted Runoff Coeff. 7852.99 0.71 Subbasin Runoff Results Total Rainfall (in).......................................... 0.93 Total Runoff (in)............................................ 0.66 Peak Runoff (cfs)......................................... 0.72 Rainfall Intensity........................................... 5.604 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.7100 Time of Concentration (days hh:mm:ss) ...... 0 00:10:00 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 Spaeth Industrial Park Monticello, MN Subbasin : toCB06 Site Development Project Input Data Area (ft2)....................................................... 9624.02 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.8000 Runoff Coefficient Area Soil Runoff Soil/Surface Description (ft') Group Coeff. Impervious 8990.00 A (0-2%) 0.85 Pervious 634.02 A (0-2%) 0.05 Composite Area & Weighted Runoff Coeff. 9624.02 0.80 Subbasin Runoff Results Total Rainfall (in).......................................... 0.93 Total Runoff (in)............................................ 0.75 Peak Runoff (cfs)......................................... 0.99 Rainfall Intensity........................................... 5.604 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.8000 Time of Concentration (days hh:mm:ss) ...... 0 00:10:00 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 Spaeth Industrial Park Monticello, MN Subbasin : toCB07 Site Development Project Input Data Area (ft2)....................................................... 8260.98 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.6800 Runoff Coefficient Area Soil Runoff Soil/Surface Description (ft') Group Coeff. Impervious 6492.01 A (0-2%) 0.85 Pervious 1769.02 A (0-2%) 0.05 Composite Area & Weighted Runoff Coeff. 8261.03 0.68 Subbasin Runoff Results Total Rainfall (in).......................................... 0.93 Total Runoff (in)............................................ 0.64 Peak Runoff (cfs)......................................... 0.72 Rainfall Intensity........................................... 5.604 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.6800 Time of Concentration (days hh:mm:ss) ...... 0 00:10:00 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 Spaeth Industrial Park Monticello, MN Subbasin : toCB08 Site Development Project Input Data Area (ft2)....................................................... 19762.00 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.7900 Runoff Coefficient Area Soil Runoff Soil/Surface Description (ft') Group Coeff. Impervious 18300.99 A (0-2%) 0.85 Pervious 1461.00 A (0-2%) 0.05 Composite Area & Weighted Runoff Coeff. 19761.99 0.79 Subbasin Runoff Results Total Rainfall (in).......................................... 0.93 Total Runoff (in)............................................ 0.74 Peak Runoff (cfs)......................................... 2.01 Rainfall Intensity........................................... 5.604 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.7900 Time of Concentration (days hh:mm:ss) ...... 0 00:10:00 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 Spaeth Industrial Park Monticello, MN Subbasin : toCB09 Site Development Project Input Data Area (ft2)....................................................... 2941.00 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.6200 Runoff Coefficient Area Soil Runoff Soil/Surface Description (ft') Group Coeff. Impervious 2093.01 A (0-2%) 0.85 Pervious 847.98 A (0-2%) 0.05 Composite Area & Weighted Runoff Coeff. 2940.99 0.62 Subbasin Runoff Results Total Rainfall (in).......................................... 0.93 Total Runoff (in)............................................ 0.58 Peak Runoff (cfs)......................................... 0.24 Rainfall Intensity........................................... 5.604 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.6200 Time of Concentration (days hh:mm:ss) ...... 0 00:10:00 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 Spaeth Industrial Park Monticello, MN Subbasin : toCB10 Site Development Project Input Data Area (ft2)....................................................... 17209.99 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.8500 Runoff Coefficient Area Soil Runoff Soil/Surface Description (ft') Group Coeff. Impervious 17209.99 A (0-2%) 0.85 Pervious 0.00 A (0-2%) 0.05 Composite Area & Weighted Runoff Coeff. 17209.99 0.85 Subbasin Runoff Results Total Rainfall (in).......................................... 0.93 Total Runoff (in)............................................ 0.79 Peak Runoff (cfs)......................................... 1.88 Rainfall Intensity........................................... 5.604 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.8500 Time of Concentration (days hh:mm:ss) ...... 0 00:10:00 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 Spaeth Industrial Park Monticello, MN Subbasin : toCB11 Site Development Project Input Data Area (ft2)....................................................... 10325.99 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.7300 Runoff Coefficient Area Soil Runoff Soil/Surface Description (ft') Group Coeff. Impervious 8765.01 A (0-2%) 0.85 Pervious 1561.02 A (0-2%) 0.05 Composite Area & Weighted Runoff Coeff. 10326.03 0.73 Subbasin Runoff Results Total Rainfall (in).......................................... 0.93 Total Runoff (in)............................................ 0.68 Peak Runoff (cfs)......................................... 0.97 Rainfall Intensity........................................... 5.604 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.7300 Time of Concentration (days hh:mm:ss) ...... 0 00:10:00 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 Spaeth Industrial Park Monticello, MN Subbasin : toCB12 Site Development Project Input Data Area (ft2)....................................................... 20571.99 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.8000 Runoff Coefficient Area Soil Runoff Soil/Surface Description (ft') Group Coeff. Impervious 19232.00 A (0-2%) 0.85 Pervious 1339.99 A (0-2%) 0.05 Composite Area & Weighted Runoff Coeff. 20571.99 0.80 Subbasin Runoff Results Total Rainfall (in).......................................... 0.93 Total Runoff (in)............................................ 0.75 Peak Runoff (cfs)......................................... 2.12 Rainfall Intensity........................................... 5.604 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.8000 Time of Concentration (days hh:mm:ss) ...... 0 00:10:00 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 Spaeth Industrial Park Monticello, MN Subbasin : toCB13 Site Development Project Input Data Area (ft2)....................................................... 11111.98 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.6900 Runoff Coefficient Area Soil Runoff Soil/Surface Description (ft') Group Coeff. Impervious 8934.98 A (0-2%) 0.85 Pervious 2177.00 A (0-2%) 0.05 Composite Area & Weighted Runoff Coeff. 11111.98 0.69 Subbasin Runoff Results Total Rainfall (in).......................................... 0.93 Total Runoff (in)............................................ 0.64 Peak Runoff (cfs)......................................... 0.99 Rainfall Intensity........................................... 5.604 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.6900 Time of Concentration (days hh:mm:ss) ...... 0 00:10:00 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 Spaeth Industrial Park Monticello, MN Subbasin : toCB14 Site Development Project Input Data Area (ft2)....................................................... 17209.99 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.8500 Runoff Coefficient Area Soil Runoff Soil/Surface Description (ft') Group Coeff. Impervious 17209.99 A (0-2%) 0.85 Pervious 0.00 A (0-2%) 0.05 Composite Area & Weighted Runoff Coeff. 17209.99 0.85 Subbasin Runoff Results Total Rainfall (in).......................................... 0.93 Total Runoff (in)............................................ 0.79 Peak Runoff (cfs)......................................... 1.88 Rainfall Intensity........................................... 5.604 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.8500 Time of Concentration (days hh:mm:ss) ...... 0 00:10:00 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 Spaeth Industrial Park Monticello, MN Subbasin : toCB15 Site Development Project Input Data Area (ft2)....................................................... 9786.02 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.7400 Runoff Coefficient Area Soil Runoff Soil/Surface Description (ft') Group Coeff. Impervious 8445.02 A (0-2%) 0.85 Pervious 1340.99 A (0-2%) 0.05 Composite Area & Weighted Runoff Coeff. 9786.01 0.74 Subbasin Runoff Results Total Rainfall (in).......................................... 0.93 Total Runoff (in)............................................ 0.69 Peak Runoff (cfs)......................................... 0.93 Rainfall Intensity........................................... 5.604 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.7400 Time of Concentration (days hh:mm:ss) ...... 0 00:10:00 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 Spaeth Industrial Park Monticello, MN Subbasin : toCB16 Site Development Project Input Data Area (ft2)....................................................... 689.99 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.0500 Runoff Coefficient Area Soil Runoff Soil/Surface Description (ft') Group Coeff. Impervious 0.00 A (0-2%) 0.85 Pervious 689.99 A (0-2%) 0.05 Composite Area & Weighted Runoff Coeff. 689.99 0.05 Subbasin Runoff Results Total Rainfall (in).......................................... 0.93 Total Runoff (in)............................................ 0.05 Peak Runoff (cfs)......................................... 0.00 Rainfall Intensity........................................... 5.604 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.0500 Time of Concentration (days hh:mm:ss) ...... 0 00:10:00 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 Spaeth Industrial Park Monticello, MN Subbasin : toCB17 Site Development Project Input Data Area (ft2)....................................................... 689.99 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.0500 Runoff Coefficient Area Soil Runoff Soil/Surface Description (ft') Group Coeff. Impervious 0.00 A (0-2%) 0.85 Pervious 689.99 A (0-2%) 0.05 Composite Area & Weighted Runoff Coeff. 689.99 0.05 Subbasin Runoff Results Total Rainfall (in).......................................... 0.93 Total Runoff (in)............................................ 0.05 Peak Runoff (cfs)......................................... 0.00 Rainfall Intensity........................................... 5.604 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.0500 Time of Concentration (days hh:mm:ss) ...... 0 00:10:00 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 Spaeth Industrial Park Monticello, MN Subbasin : toCB18 Site Development Project Input Data Area (ft2)....................................................... 689.99 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.0500 Runoff Coefficient Area Soil Runoff Soil/Surface Description (ft') Group Coeff. Impervious 0.00 A (0-2%) 0.85 Pervious 689.99 A (0-2%) 0.05 Composite Area & Weighted Runoff Coeff. 689.99 0.05 Subbasin Runoff Results Total Rainfall (in).......................................... 0.93 Total Runoff (in)............................................ 0.05 Peak Runoff (cfs)......................................... 0.00 Rainfall Intensity........................................... 5.604 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.0500 Time of Concentration (days hh:mm:ss) ...... 0 00:10:00 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 Spaeth Industrial Park Monticello, MN Subbasin : toCB19 Site Development Project Input Data Area (ft2)....................................................... 689.99 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.0500 Runoff Coefficient Area Soil Runoff Soil/Surface Description (ft') Group Coeff. Impervious 0.00 A (0-2%) 0.85 Pervious 689.99 A (0-2%) 0.05 Composite Area & Weighted Runoff Coeff. 689.99 0.05 Subbasin Runoff Results Total Rainfall (in).......................................... 0.93 Total Runoff (in)............................................ 0.05 Peak Runoff (cfs)......................................... 0.00 Rainfall Intensity........................................... 5.604 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.0500 Time of Concentration (days hh:mm:ss) ...... 0 00:10:00 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 Junction Input Spaeth Industrial Park Monticello, MN Site Development Project SN Element Invert Ground/Rim Ground/Rim Initial Initial Surcharge Surcharge Ponded Minimum ID Elevation (Max) (Max) Water Water Elevation Depth Area Pipe Elevation Offset Elevation Depth Cover (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) ft) (ft) (ftp) (in) 1 CB -01 956.58 961.20 4.70 956.50 0. 0 961.0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 2 CB -02 956.50 961.60 5.10 956.50 0.00 961.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 CB -03 956.50 961.10 4.60 956.50 0.00 961.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 4 CB -04 956.50 961.60 5.10 956.50 0.00 961.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 5 CB -05 956.50 961.40 4.90 956.50 0.00 961.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 6 CB -06 957.50 961.40 3.90 957.50 0.00 961.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 7 CB -07 957.00 961.40 4.40 957.00 0.00 961.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 8 CB -08 957.70 961.10 3.40 957.70 0.00 961.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9 CB -09 958.00 961.20 3.20 95.80 -862.20 961.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 10 CB -10 958.70 961.90 3.20 958.70 0.00 961.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 11 CB -11 958.20 961.60 3.40 958.20 0.00 961.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 12 CB -12 957.60 961.10 3.50 957.60 0.00 961.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 13 CB -13 957.90 961.10 3.20 957.90 0.00 961.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 14 CB -14 958.70 961.90 3.20 958.70 0.00 961.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 15 CB -15 957.40 961.60 4.20 957.40 0.00 961.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 16 CB -16 959.00 962.50 3.50 959.00 0.00 962.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 17 CB -17 959.00 962.50 3.50 959.00 0.00 962.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 18 CB -18 959.00 962.50 3.50 959.00 0.00 962.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 19 CB -19 959.00 962.50 3.50 959.00 0.00 962.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 20 FES -B 958.50 960.50 2.00 958.50 0.00 960.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 21 FES -C 957.50 960.50 3.00 956.00 -1.50 960.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 22 FES -D 957.00 960.50 3.50 956.00 -1.00 960.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 Time of Time of Total Total Time Max HGL Peak Flooded Flooded Occurrence Spaeth Industrial Park Volume Occurrence (days hh:mm) (days hh:mm) Monticello, MN (min) 0 00:03 0 00:11 0.97 44.00 0 00:05 0 00:10 0.41 Site Development Project Junction Results 0 00:09 0.45 17.00 0 00:02 0 00:10 1.04 17.00 SN Element Peak Peak Max HGL Max HGL Max Min Average HGL Average HGL ID Inflow Lateral Elevation Depth Surcharge Freeboard Elevation Depth 0 00:10 0 00:00 Inflow Attained Attained Depth Attained Attained Attained 0 00:10 0 00:00 0.00 0.00 0 00:07 Attained 0.02 5.00 0 00:07 0 00:10 (cfs) (cfs) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) 1 CB -01 3.70 0.22 961.20 4.70 0.00 0.00 958.13 1.63 2 CB -02 4.45 0.96 961.60 5.10 0.00 0.00 958.45 1.95 3 CB -03 4.52 0.99 961.10 4.60 0.00 0.00 957.35 0.85 4 CB -04 9.36 9.24 961.60 5.10 0.00 0.00 956.58 0.08 5 CB -05 0.72 0.72 958.50 2.00 0.00 2.90 958.50 2.00 6 CB -06 0.99 0.99 961.40 3.90 0.00 0.00 958.03 0.53 7 CB -07 6.65 0.96 961.40 4.40 0.00 0.00 957.06 0.06 8 CB -08 2.24 2.01 961.10 3.40 0.00 0.00 958.01 0.31 9 CB -09 0.26 0.26 958.27 0.27 0.00 2.93 958.00 0.00 10 CB -10 1.88 1.88 961.90 3.20 0.00 0.00 958.71 0.01 11 CB -11 1.33 1.33 958.87 0.67 0.00 2.73 958.21 0.01 12 CB -12 2.13 2.12 961.10 3.50 0.00 0.00 957.62 0.02 13 CB -13 4.17 2.95 961.10 3.20 0.00 0.00 957.92 0.02 14 CB -14 1.88 1.88 959.26 0.56 0.00 2.64 958.71 0.01 15 CB -15 6.03 1.18 961.60 4.20 0.00 0.00 957.62 0.22 16 CB -16 0.00 0.00 959.03 0.03 0.00 3.47 959.00 0.00 17 CB -17 0.00 0.00 959.02 0.02 0.00 3.48 959.00 0.00 18 CB -18 0.00 0.00 959.02 0.02 0.00 3.48 959.00 0.00 19 CB -19 0.00 0.00 959.03 0.03 0.00 3.47 959.00 0.00 20 FES -B 0.00 0.00 958.50 0.00 0.00 2.00 958.50 0.00 21 FES -C 0.31 0.00 958.50 1.00 0.00 2.00 957.51 0.01 22 FES -D 0.55 0.00 958.25 1.25 0.00 2.25 957.02 0.02 Time of Time of Total Total Time Max HGL Peak Flooded Flooded Occurrence Flooding Volume Occurrence (days hh:mm) (days hh:mm) (ac -in) (min) 0 00:03 0 00:11 0.97 44.00 0 00:05 0 00:10 0.41 21.00 0 00:04 0 00:09 0.45 17.00 0 00:02 0 00:10 1.04 17.00 0 00:00 0 00:00 0.00 0.00 0 00:03 0 00:10 0.08 14.00 0 00:02 0 00:10 1.11 19.00 0 00:07 0 00:10 0.03 6.00 0 00:10 0 00:00 0.00 0.00 0 00:08 0 00:10 0.01 3.00 0 00:10 0 00:00 0.00 0.00 0 00:07 0 00:10 0.02 5.00 0 00:07 0 00:10 0.06 6.00 0 00:10 0 00:00 0.00 0.00 0 00:08 0 00:10 0.03 4.00 0 00:10 0 00:00 0.00 0.00 0 00:10 0 00:00 0.00 0.00 0 00:10 0 00:00 0.00 0.00 0 00:10 0 00:00 0.00 0.00 0 00:00 0 00:00 0.00 0.00 0 00:04 0 00:00 0.00 0.00 0 00:03 0 00:00 0.00 0.00 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 Pipe Input SN Element ID 1 BasintoFES-B 2 CB01toFESA 3 CB02toCB01 4 CB03toCB02 5 CB04toCB03 6 CB05toCB04 7 CB07toFES-C 8 CB08toCB01 9 CB08toFES-C 10 CB09toCB08 11 CB10toCB02 12 CB11toCB13 13 CB12toCB03 14 CB13toCB15 15 CB14toCB15 16 CB15toCB07 17 CB16toCB08 18 CB17toCB12 19 CB18toCB12 20 CB19toCB06 21 FES-BtoCB05 22 FES-CtoBasin 23 FES-DtoBasin Spaeth Industrial Park Monticello, MN Site Development Project Length Inlet Inlet Outlet Outlet Total Average Pipe Exit/Bend Invert Invert Invert Invert Drop Slope Shape Roughness Elevatii(on Offset Elevation Offset Losses Flow (()) Barrels Height 141.Oft4 956.0 0.00 9585ft0 0.00 -25ft0 -1.7700 Dummy 18.00 958.00 1.50 958.00 0.00 0.00 0.0000 CIRCULAR 148.00 956.50 0.00 956.50 0.00 0.00 0.0000 CIRCULAR 136.00 956.50 0.00 956.50 0.00 0.00 0.0000 CIRCULAR 136.00 956.50 0.00 956.50 0.00 0.00 0.0000 CIRCULAR 152.00 956.50 0.00 956.50 0.00 0.00 0.0000 CIRCULAR 16.00 957.00 0.00 957.00 0.00 0.00 0.0000 CIRCULAR 144.00 957.70 0.00 957.40 0.90 0.30 0.2100 CIRCULAR 15.00 957.50 0.00 957.50 0.00 0.00 0.0000 CIRCULAR 144.00 958.00 0.00 957.70 0.00 0.30 0.2100 CIRCULAR 144.00 958.70 0.00 958.40 1.90 0.30 0.2100 CIRCULAR 136.00 958.20 0.00 957.90 0.00 0.30 0.2200 CIRCULAR 144.00 957.60 0.00 957.30 0.80 0.30 0.2100 CIRCULAR 136.00 957.90 0.00 957.60 0.20 0.30 0.2200 CIRCULAR 144.00 958.70 0.00 957.60 0.20 1.10 0.7600 CIRCULAR 151.00 957.40 0.00 957.00 0.00 0.40 0.2600 CIRCULAR 86.00 959.00 0.00 958.00 0.30 1.00 1.1600 CIRCULAR 74.00 959.00 0.00 957.60 0.00 1.40 1.8900 CIRCULAR 74.00 959.00 0.00 957.60 0.00 1.40 1.8900 CIRCULAR 86.00 959.00 0.00 958.00 0.50 1.00 1.1600 CIRCULAR 12.00 958.50 0.00 958.50 2.00 0.00 0.0000 CIRCULAR 38.82 957.50 0.00 956.00 0.00 1.50 3.8600 Dummy 96.11 957.00 0.00 956.00 0.00 1.00 1.0400 Dummy 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 Pipe Pipe Manning's Entrance Exit/Bend Additional Initial Flap No. of Diameter or Width Roughness Losses Losses Losses Flow Gate Barrels Height inl J0.000 0.000 0.0150 0.5000 0.5000 0.0000 nO No 1 15.000 15.000 0.0130 0.5000 0.5000 0.0000 0.00 No 1 36.000 36.000 0.0130 0.5000 0.5000 0.0000 0.00 No 1 36.000 36.000 0.0130 0.5000 0.5000 0.0000 0.00 No 1 36.000 36.000 0.0130 0.5000 0.5000 0.0000 0.00 No 1 36.000 36.000 0.0130 0.5000 0.5000 0.0000 0.00 No 1 15.000 15.000 0.0130 0.5000 0.5000 0.0000 0.00 No 1 12.000 12.000 0.0130 0.5000 0.5000 0.0000 0.00 No 1 12.000 12.000 0.0130 0.5000 0.5000 0.0000 0.00 No 1 12.000 12.000 0.0130 0.5000 0.5000 0.0000 0.00 No 1 12.000 12.000 0.0130 0.5000 0.5000 0.0000 0.00 No 1 12.000 12.000 0.0130 0.5000 0.5000 0.0000 0.00 No 1 12.000 12.000 0.0130 0.5000 0.5000 0.0000 0.00 No 1 15.000 15.000 0.0130 0.5000 0.5000 0.0000 0.00 No 1 12.000 12.000 0.0130 0.5000 0.5000 0.0000 0.00 No 1 18.000 18.000 0.0130 0.5000 0.5000 0.0000 0.00 No 1 12.000 12.000 0.0130 0.5000 0.5000 0.0000 0.00 No 1 12.000 12.000 0.0130 0.5000 0.5000 0.0000 0.00 No 1 12.000 12.000 0.0130 0.5000 0.5000 0.0000 0.00 No 1 12.000 12.000 0.0130 0.5000 0.5000 0.0000 0.00 No 1 18.000 18.000 0.0130 0.5000 0.5000 0.0000 0.00 No 1 0.000 0.000 0.0150 0.5000 0.5000 0.0000 0.00 No 1 0.000 0.000 0.0150 0.5000 0.5000 0.0000 0.00 No 1 Pipe Results Spaeth Industrial Park Monticello, MN Site Development Project SN Element Peak Time of Design Flow Peak Flow/ Peak Flow Travel Peak Flow Peak Flow Total Time Froude Reported ID Flow Peak Flow Capacity Design Flow Velocity Time Depth Depth/ Surcharged Number Condition Occurrence Ratio Total Depth Ratio (cfs) (days hh:mm) (cfs) (ft/sec) (min) (ft) (min) 1 BasintoFES-B 0.00 0 00:00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 CB01toFESA 0.52 0 00:47 0.48 1.08 0.47 0.64 1.25 1.00 43.00 SURCHARGED 3 CB02toCB01 1.88 0 00:11 1.73 1.08 0.36 6.85 3.00 1.00 15.00 SURCHARGED 4 CB03toCB02 1.96 0 00:09 1.81 1.08 0.38 5.96 3.00 1.00 12.00 SURCHARGED 5 CB04toCB03 1.96 0 00:20 1.81 1.08 0.43 5.27 3.00 1.00 12.00 SURCHARGED 6 CB05toCB04 0.52 0 00:20 1.71 0.31 0.56 4.52 1.03 0.34 0.00 Calculated 7 CB07toFES-C 0.55 0 00:02 0.51 1.08 0.55 0.48 1.25 1.00 18.00 SURCHARGED 8 CB08toCB01 1.76 0 00:09 1.63 1.08 2.55 0.94 1.00 1.00 4.00 SURCHARGED 9 CB08toFES-C 0.31 0 00:03 0.29 1.08 0.67 0.37 1.00 1.00 13.00 SURCHARGED 10 CB09toCB08 0.25 0 00:11 1.63 0.15 2.67 0.90 0.26 0.26 0.00 Calculated 11 CB10toCB02 1.76 0 00:12 1.63 1.08 4.01 0.60 0.94 0.94 0.00 > CAPACITY 12 CB11toCB13 1.29 0 00:10 1.67 0.77 3.79 0.60 0.66 0.66 0.00 Calculated 13 CB12toCB03 1.76 0 00:09 1.63 1.08 3.63 0.66 1.00 1.00 3.00 SURCHARGED 14 CB13toCB15 3.28 0 00:13 3.03 1.08 3.02 0.75 1.25 1.00 4.00 SURCHARGED 15 CB14toCB15 1.85 0 00:10 3.11 0.60 5.92 0.41 0.55 0.55 0.00 Calculated 16 CB15toCB07 5.85 0 00:12 5.41 1.08 3.63 0.69 1.42 0.94 0.00 > CAPACITY 17 CB16toCB08 0.00 0 00:11 3.84 0.00 0.83 1.73 0.03 0.03 0.00 Calculated 18 CB17toCB12 0.00 0 00:10 4.90 0.00 0.98 1.26 0.02 0.02 0.00 Calculated 19 CB18toCB12 0.00 0 00:10 4.90 0.00 0.98 1.26 0.02 0.02 0.00 Calculated 20 CB19toCB06 0.00 0 00:11 3.84 0.00 0.83 1.73 0.03 0.03 0.00 Calculated 21 FES-BtoCB05 0.00 0 00:00 0.96 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Calculated 22 FES-CtoBasin 0.31 0 00:03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Calculated 23 FES-DtoBasin 0.55 0 00:02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Calculated 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 Ito A!077 NVId SV3tlV 3'JVNIVIi0 w°''va°�'^"^^"` i i uvv� I laar. o> = vvr c 3ZI$ 3dld W1i01$ I9C659�n o9e�quoryd — W 3]WJS ]YOLLb3A 3]WJS ]YINOZIbOH 4$ A8 Q3NO3N0 W O N 4 -—N9/S3Q 3175 a— \ vl Z9S49 N'-116013uoyy as ,�a aaNslsaa P hl supun90l ONIN33N/'JN37/AL7 L9 a3aYd]ad po Q � eo se un z $ NHVd ivialsn(Ml N �b as a NMYdO o o H13`ddS A >,u ,liq woe�ie :o. y >, w i s ec woW nyi low yya ,rvany / 4 T t Z p E 3 a r O LO Ln r fId (reserved for recording information) STORMWATER FACILITIES MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this day of , 20 , by and between the CITY OF MONTICELLO, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City"), and , a Minnesota limited liabilitv companv ("Owner"). 1. BACKGROUND. Owner is the fee owner of certain property located within the City of Monticello, County of Wright, State of Minnesota legally described as follows: Parcel ID No. Lot X, Block X, according to the recorded plat thereof. (Abstract/Torrens Property) having a street address of , Monticello, MN 55362 ("Subject Property"). Owner is intending to construct certain private stormwater facilities on the subject property as shown on the attached Exhibit "A". The private stormwater consists of an underground and above ground infiltration system and sump catch basins. Drainage of stormwater from the site consists of stormsewer at a shallow grade. The Owner is responsible for inspecting and maintaining the entire system. Owner will be responsible for ensuring the system is designed to visually verify that it is discharging through the soil surface within 48 hours or less and there is adequate maintenance access. Documentation of inspection and maintenance is required 1 and shall be furnished upon request by the City. The MPCA Stormwater Manual will be used for reference for this operation and maintenance plan. The recommended frequency of inspections is outlined in the MPCA Stormwater Manual and there are templates that can be used for documentation. This agreement is in accordance with the City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 4: Finishing Standards; Section 4.10 Grading, Drainage, Stormwater Management and Erosion Control; Maintenance of Private Stormwater Management Facilities. 2. MAINTENANCE. The Owner shall inspect, maintain, operate and replace in a good state of repair and safe condition all stormwater facilities, including, without limitation, drainage swales, storm sewer systems, infiltration basins, sedimentation basins and ponding systems on the subject property to ensure that the stormwater facilities ("Facilities") function as intended. Now, therefore, it is mutually agreed by and between all parties: A. Owner, at its expense, shall be responsible for the inspection and maintenance of the Facilities so that the Facilities function properly. Owner shall submit a report to the City, upon request, that includes the inspection date(s) of the Facilities, conditions of the Facilities, testing of the Facilities and any corrective actions taken. B. Owner shall annually in the Fall inspect and document inflow points and infiltration surface for buildup of road sand associated with spring melt period, remove as necessary and replant areas that have been impacted by sand/salt build up. C. The following operational maintenance activities shall be performed on all Facilities on an annual basis or as needed: 1. Removal of trash and debris, 2. Inspection of sump catch basins, inlets and outlets monthly, 3. Removal of sediments when the storage volume or conveyance capacity of the stormwater management system is below design levels 4. Ensure systems designed for infiltration are drawing down within 48 hours, infiltration testing is performed as identified in the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Stormwater Manual and 5. Stabilization and restoration of eroded areas. 2 D. If the Facilities are not functioning as designed and permitted, operational maintenance must be performed immediately to restore the system. If operational maintenance measures are insufficient to enable the system to meet the design and performance standards of this chapter, the permittee must either replace the system or construct an alternative design. E. In the event the Owner fails to maintain the Facilities in good working condition acceptable to the City, the City may enter upon the Property and take such steps as are necessary to correct deficiencies identified in the inspection report and to charge the costs of such repairs to the Owner. This provision shall not be construed to allow the City to erect any structure of permanent nature on the land of the Owner for the stormwater facilities. It is expressly understood and agreed that the City is under no obligation to routinely maintain or repair said facilities, and in no event shall this Agreement be construed to impose any such obligation on the City. The Owner grants to the City, its authorized agents and employees, a non-exclusive, perpetual easement over, across, under and through the Property for such purposes. This maintenance agreement is a personal obligation of Owner and shall be binding upon the executors, administrators, successors, heirs and assigns of Owner. 3. RECORDING. This Agreement shall be recorded against the title to the subject property and shall be binding upon Owner, its/their assigns, heirs and successors in interest. CITY OF MONTICELLO BY: (SEAL) Brian Stumpf, Mayor Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF WRIGHT ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20, by Brian Stumpf and by Jeff O'Neill, respectively the Mayor and City Administrator of the City of Monticello, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC 2 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument ,20 , by THIS INSTRUMENT DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (651) 452-5000 SRN:ms PROPERTY OWNER: was acknowledged before me NOTARY PUBLIC 5 this day of EXHIBIT "A" SKETCH DEPICTING STORMWATER FACILITIES WSB Building a legacy — your legacy. July 19, 2017 Ms. Angela Schumann Community Development Director City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1 Monticello, MN 55362 Re: Spaeth Industrial Park Final Stage PUD- Plan Review City Project No. 2017-017 WSB Project No. 02596-420 Dear Ms. Schumann: 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763-541-4800 Fax: 763-541-1700 We have reviewed the revised civil plans and stormwater report, dated July 3, 2017, as prepared by Civil Engineering Site Design and offer the following comments below noted in orange to the applicant's July 12, 2017 responses noted in blue. Stormwater Management 1. The NRCS Soil Survey indicates HSG B soils throughout the site and contributing offsite area. The HydroCAD model and narrative should be updated to reflect type B soils. Infiltration rates surrounding the perforated pipe system should be updated according to those listed in the Minnesota Stormwater Manual. Response: Geotechnical report with field soil borings has been completed by Haugo Geotechnical Services. Soils as identified in the report are consistent with type A soils and were found to be consistent across the site. Infiltration rates in infiltration areas should be verified in the field after soil amendments are implemented. Equal Opportunity Employer wsbeng.com K:\02596-420\Admin\Docs\070617 resubmittal Spaeth Industrial Park July 19, 2017 Page 2 2. Because the entire site is underlain by the infiltration area, confirmation of design infiltration rates during construction should be completed. The infiltration system needs to be confirmed that it will function as it was designed with preliminary estimates. This can be accomplished by performing infiltration testing, such as double ring infiltrometer tests. The MPCA guide for determining the number of infiltration tests and borings is provided here: Response: Geotechnical report by Haugo Geotechnical Services included a double - ring infiltrometer test at the location of the proposed south infiltration basin. Result of the double -ring infiltrometer test is 54.01 in/hr. The applicant proposed to amend the soils of the infiltration basin. Infiltration rates in infiltration areas should be verified in the field after soil amendments are implemented. 3. Soils that have infiltration rates more than 8.3 inches per hour must be amended to slow the infiltration rate below 8.3 inches per hour, per the CSWGP. The CSWGP does allow for the local unit of government (the City) flexibility with this rate criteria. Response: Amended soils are proposed to be placed in the bottom of the south infiltration basin to reduce infiltration rate. Amended soils are to consist of 70%-80% sand, and 20%-30% compost MnDOT Grade 2. Surface area of stormwater control measure (BMP)(W) < 1000 1004 to 5000 5000 to 10000 5161016 Barings Pits Permeameter tests 1 s 5 2 2 10 3 3 15 41 41 2C' - Ian additional soil boringvr pit should be oampleted for each additinnar 2,500 ft} above 12r560 fe San additional fare permeametertests should be completed for each additionA 5.000 ft' above 15r0 13 ft° Infiltration rates in infiltration areas should be verified in the field after soil amendments are implemented. 4. Rate control is assumed to be accommodated in the existing north -south ditch/channel and downstream pond located on the north side of Chelsea Road, just west of Fallon Avenue at the City's water reservoir site. The applicant has indicated they are providing rate control with the infiltration system and shall revise the system as needed. Response: Hydrocad model calculations dated 07/03/2017 have been submitted. Modifications have been incorporated with increased discharge to Dundas Road K:\02596-420\Admin\Docs\070617 resubmittal\LTR-a-Schumann-Spaeth PUD071917.docx Spaeth Industrial Park July 19, 2017 Page 3 roadside ditch that ultimately drains to city regional pond. Discharge from 2yr storm event proposed conditions is slightly higher than existing conditions (0.04cfs vs 0.03cfs). Discharge from 10yr storm event proposed conditions is less than existing conditions (0.12cfs vs 0.61 cfs). Discharge from 100yr storm event proposed conditions is less than existing conditions (4.03cfs vs 6.59cfs). Update table in memo indicating the total discharge rates leaving the site, including discharge from the perforated pipe system. Regional ponding is required as rates are not being maintained onsite. Grading and Drainage Plan 5. Clearly define an emergency overflow elevation (EOF) on the plans. Response: EOF overflow elevation has been added to the plan. The EOF should be clearly called out on Sheet C2. Sanitary and Water Utilitv Plan 6. An 8"x6" tee should be noted on the plans instead of 6"x6" for the water services to the buildings. Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions. Please have the applicant provide a written response addressing the comments above. Please give me a call at 763-271-3236 if you have any questions or comments regarding this letter. Thank you. Sincerely, WSB & Associates, Inc. i, e. oql Shibani K. Bisson, PE City Engineer cc: Steve Grittman, NAC skb K:\02596-420\Admin\Docs\070617 resubmittal\LTR-a-Schumann-Spaeth PUD071917.docx Civil Engineering Site Design 118 East Broadway St., PO Box 566, Monticello MN 55362 Phone: 763-314-0929 www.civilesd.com July 12, 2017 City of Monticello Attn: Ms. Shibani Bisson, City Engineer 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1 Monticello, MN 55362 Re: Response to City Engineering comments 05/31/2017 Spaeth Industrial Park Dear Ms. Bisson, This letter is written with item by item responses to comments dated 05/31/16 by WSB and Associates which is a review of plans by CESD dated 05/08/2017. Responses are in blue color text. Revisions have been incorporated on site plans with revision date 07/03/2017. Stormwater Management 1. Proposed stormwater management for the site includes an underground infiltration system consisting of perforated storm sewer under a majority of the paved areas with 0% grades and an infiltration basin along the south property line. The ultimate discharge elevation of this system to the ditch along Dundas Road is at an elevation of 958.7 feet which is 1.7 feet above the infiltration system elevation of 957.0. This creates a situation where, apart from infiltration, runoff will only leave the site after water builds up 1.7 feet. In the event that the infiltration system plugs up and fails, the underground pipe network will be filled with water. Flat pipes across the entire site will likely result in maintenance problems. This is not an ideal or a recommended design if not properly maintained, as it could create a risk for on-site flooding. City staff has discussed alternate stormwater management techniques with the applicant, such as outletting the system to the south east corner of the property and directing it to the ditch/channel that serves the industrial park or filling the site to provide a positive outlet. There are additional property constraints and costs associated with these alternatives that the applicant has reviewed and has chosen not to undertake. Ultimately the proposed stormwater management Response to City Engineering comments 05/31/2017 Page 2 of 8 Spaeth Industrial Park July 12, 2017 system is privately owned and maintained and should not impact the City's ditch/channel system and adjacent properties if properly maintained. Response: Discharge of stormwater to Dundas Road roadside ditch is the only viable option for the project. Storm sewer routing has been modified to direct as much site drainage as possible to the infiltration basin at the south end of the site. Discharge pipe from the basin along east side has been increased in size, and outlet elevation at Dundas Road roadside ditch has been adjusted to provide increase discharge rate for large rainfall events. System will be privately owned and maintained and will not impact adjacent properties. 2. An operation and maintenance plan for the stormwater management system is required. The City will provide an operation and maintenance plan for the owner to sign. At a minimum the plan will include: an inspection schedule/frequency for the infiltration system and maintenance schedule for cleaning out the sumps. The proposed site design must provide for a means to visually inspect and maintain the entire system. This will require visual ports throughout the site, in order to locate and repair problem areas if the system fails. Response: Understood. 3. The infiltration system should be designed to provide a means to visually verify that the system is discharging through the soil surface within 48 hours or less. Also, the system must be designed for adequate maintenance access. Response: Catch basins or catch basin manholes are provided throughout the system that will function for monitoring and maintenance access. 4. The NRCS Soil Survey indicates HSG B soils throughout the site and contributing offsite area. The HydroCAD model and narrative should be updated to reflect type B soils. Infiltration rates surrounding the perforated pipe system should be updated according to those listed in the Minnesota Stormwater Manual. Response: Geotechnical report with field soil borings has been completed by Haugo Geotechnical Services. Soils as identified in the report are consistent with type A soils and were found to be consistent across the site. Response to City Engineering comments 05/31/2017 Page 3 of 8 Spaeth Industrial Park July 12, 2017 Depth to groundwater and bedrock must be confirmed in the proposed infiltration areas to ensure infiltration is not being proposed within 3 feet of the seasonally high water table or bedrock. This information should be obtained from a soil boring investigation. Soil classifications from the investigation can be used for preliminary design purposes. Soil borings should extend to a minimum of 5 feet below the bottom of the infiltration practice. The lowest (i.e. most restrictive) infiltration rate within 5 feet shall be used for design purposes. Response: Soil borings completed at the site by Haugo Geotechnical Services found no evidence of ground water with 15 feet of the ground surface. Therefore, there is no ground water within 3 feet of the infiltration practice. 6. Because the entire site is underlain by the infiltration area, confirmation of design infiltration rates during construction should be completed. The infiltration system needs to be confirmed that it will function as it was designed with preliminary estimates. This can be accomplished by performing infiltration testing, such as double ring infiltrometer tests. The MPCA guide for determining the number of infiltration tests and borings is provided here: Surface area of stormwater control measure (BMP)(ft) < 1040 1000 to 5000 5000 to 10000 710000 Barings 1 Pits 1 Perm eameter tests 5 10 15 2 2 3 41 3 41 201 tan additional soil boring ar pit should be completed for each additional 2,500 ftx above 12,540 ft, San additional fare permeametertests should be completed for each add itional5,04fl ft; above 15r404 ftp Response: Geotechnical report by Haugo Geotechnical Services included a double -ring infiltrometer test at the location of the proposed south infiltration basin. Result of the double -ring infiltrometer test is 54.01 in/hr. 7. Soils that have infiltration rates more than 8.3 inches per hour must be amended to slow the infiltration rate below 8.3 inches per hour, per the CSWGP. The CSWGP does allow for the local unit of government (the City) flexibility with this rate criteria. Response to City Engineering comments 05/31/2017 Page 4 of 8 Spaeth Industrial Park July 12, 2017 Response: Amended soils are proposed to be placed in the bottom of the south infiltration basin to reduce infiltration rate. Amended soils are to consist of 70%-80% sand, and 20%-30% compost MnDOT Grade 2. 8. Provide rational method calculations confirming adequacy of the storm sewer design for the 10 -year storm event. Calculations should adhere to the following guidelines: • The rational method runoff coefficient (c) is designated by land use and should be assigned a value no less than 0.7. • Minimum allowable velocity in closed conduit = 3.0 fps • Maximum allowable velocity in closed conduit = 12.0 fps Response: Rational method calculations dated 07/03/2017 have been submitted. 9. Rate control is assumed to be accommodated in the existing north -south ditch/channel and downstream pond located on the north side of Chelsea Road, just west of Fallon Avenue at the City's water reservoir site. The applicant has indicated they are providing rate control with the infiltration system and shall revise the system as needed. Response: Hydrocad model calculations dated 07/03/2017 have been submitted. Modifications have been incorporated with increased discharge to Dundas Road roadside ditch that ultimately drains to city regional pond. Discharge from 2yr storm event proposed conditions is slightly higher than existing conditions (0.04cfs vs 0.03cfs). Discharge from 10yr storm event proposed conditions is less than existing conditions (0.12cfs vs 0.61 cfs). Discharge from 100yr storm event proposed conditions is less than existing conditions (4.03cfs vs 6.59cfs). 10. Grading, drainage and erosion control shall comply with City's zoning ordinance. See Chapter 4, section 4.10 related to grading, drainage, stormwater management and erosion control and the City's Design Manual - updated May 2017 located on the City's website- Engineering department. Response: Understood. Response to City Engineering comments 05/31/2017 Page 5 of 8 Spaeth Industrial Park July 12, 2017 HvdroCAD Model 11. The proposed stormwater management system (as it currently is designed) should be modeled with a starting water elevation of 958.7 feet for establishing the 100 year HWL elevation. Response: Further discussion is needed. Given the existing soils at the site, capacity for infiltration, and system volume capacity, limiting starting water elevation to 958.7 is not appropriate. 12. Proposed discharge rates exceed existing in the 2 -year event. Rates should be summarized at each point of discharge from the site (North, East and South). Response: Discharge rates to various directions has been indicated in Drainage Analysis report dated 07/03/2017. 13. Time of concentrations should be updated to more accurately reflect the proposed subcatchments based on land cover and average slope. Response: Time of concentrations used in the model are understood to be appropriate for development proposed. 14. There is a discrepancy in the primary outlet device from Pond Pl, labelled 15" in the model and 18" in the plans. If the pipe is designed to be an 18 -inch RCP, additional rip -rap is required (3.6 CY rather than 2.9 CY). Response: Modification has been incorporated. SWPPP Refer to the MPCA's SWPPP Checklist for a complete list of requirements. 15. Describe the procedures to amend the SWPPP and establish additional ESC BMPs as necessary. Response: Additional notes to be added to the plan. 16. Describe methods used to minimize soil compaction and preserve topsoil Response: Additional notes have been added to the plan. Response to City Engineering comments 05/31/2017 Page 6 of 8 Spaeth Industrial Park July 12, 2017 17. Since 1 acre or more of the site is being disturbed, a NPDES/SDS Construction Storm Water General Permit and SWPPP shall be provided with the grading permit or with the building permit application for review, prior to construction commencing. Response: Understood. 18. The SWPPP mentions select roof drainage is directed to the wetland adjacent to the south property boundary. This note is incorrect. Response: Notes have been modified. Site Plan 19. Provide a truck turning template for a semi -truck accessing the truck access areas on the site. The applicant has indicated that semi trucks will not be entering the site, however it does, the City would like a template showing how circulation will be accomplished and the ability for trucks to be contained within the curbed area. Response: Vehicle circulation plan dated 07/03/2017 using WB -50 Truck has been submitted. Grading and Drainage Plan 20. Clearly define an emergency overflow elevation (EOF) on the plans. Response: EOF overflow elevation has been added to the plan. Sanitary and Water Utilitv Plan 21. A note should be added to the plans that the City will not be responsible for any additional costs incurred that is associated with variations in the utility as - built elevations. These elevations shall be verified in the field prior to construction. Response: Note added. Response to City Engineering comments 05/31/2017 Page 7 of 8 Spaeth Industrial Park July 12, 2017 22. The development agreement will include language on City maintenance of the sanitary sewer mainline and watermain system within the site. Response: Undertood. 23. A utility excavation permit must be obtained from the Public Works department prior to commencement of utility connections. Response: Understood. 24. Provide an as -built utility plan once construction is complete. Response: Understood. Storm Sewer Utilitv Plan 25. Confirm that the HDPE perforated pipe being proposed under pavement throughout the site is designed to handle the loads it will experience. Response: Pipe manufacture/supplier confirmed the perforated pipe is designed to handle H-25 loading. 26. Label the storm sewer pipe between CB -3 and CB -5. Response: Pipe label has been added. Site Details 27. It is recommended to add a trash guard for flared end sections per City Detail 4007. Response: City detail 4007 has been added. 28. Include City Detail 6003- Mud Mat Construction Entrance. Response: City detail 6003 has been added. 29. Include City Detail Response: City details as appropriate have been added. Response to City Engineering comments 05/31/2017 Page 8 of 8 Spaeth Industrial Park July 12, 2017 30. Applicable detail plates shall be updated per the City's April 2017 General Specifications and Standard Detail Plates for Street and Utility Construction located on the City's website- Engineering department. Response: City details as appropriate have been added. Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions regarding the responses to comments and/or revised plans. Sincerely, Civil Engineering Design, LLC Scott Dahlke Professional Engineer Cc: File 00633 1WSB Building a legacy — Your legacy. May 31, 2017 Ms. Angela Schumann Community Development Director City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1 Monticello, MN 55362 Re: Spaeth Industrial Park Preliminary Development Stage PUD -Site Plan Review City Project No. 2017-017 WSB Project No. 02596-420 Dear Ms. Schumann: 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763-541-4800 Fax: 763-541-1700 We have reviewed the civil plans, dated May 8, 2017 and the drainage analysis dated May 8, 2017, as prepared by Civil Engineering Site Design and offer the following comments below and on the enclosed is a stormwater plan review checklist. Stormwater Management 1. Proposed stormwater management for the site includes an underground infiltration system consisting of perforated storm sewer under a majority of the paved areas with 0% grades and an infiltration basin along the south property line. The ultimate discharge elevation of this system to the ditch along Dundas Road is at an elevation of 958.7 feet which is 1.7 feet above the infiltration system elevation of 957.0. This creates a situation where, apart from infiltration, runoff will only leave the site after water builds up 1.7 feet. In the event that the infiltration system plugs up and fails, the underground pipe network will be filled with water. Flat pipes across the entire site will likely result in maintenance problems. This is not an ideal or a recommended design if not properly maintained, as it could create a risk for on-site flooding. City staff has discussed alternate stormwater management techniques with the applicant, such as outletting the system to the south east corner of the property and directing it to the ditch/channel that serves the industrial park or filling the site to provide a positive outlet. There are additional property constraints and costs associated with these alternatives that the applicant has reviewed and has chosen not to undertake. Ultimately the proposed stormwater management system is privately owned and maintained and should not impact the City's ditch/channel system and adjacent properties if properly maintained. Equal Opportunity Employer wsbeng.com K:\02596-420\Adm1n\Docs\050817 submittal Spaeth Industrial Park May 31, 2017 Page 2 2. An operation and maintenance plan for the stormwater management system is required. The City will provide an operation and maintenance plan for the owner to sign. At a minimum the plan will include: an inspection schedule/frequency for the infiltration system and maintenance schedule for cleaning out the sumps. The proposed site design must provide for a means to visually inspect and maintain the entire system. This will require visual ports throughout the site, in order to locate and repair problem areas if the system fails. 3. The infiltration system should be designed to provide a means to visually verify that the system is discharging through the soil surface within 48 hours or less. Also, the system must be designed for adequate maintenance access. 4. The NRCS Soil Survey indicates HSG B soils throughout the site and contributing offsite area. The HydroCAD model and narrative should be updated to reflect type B soils. Infiltration rates surrounding the perforated pipe system should be updated according to those listed in the Minnesota Stormwater Manual. 5. Depth to groundwater and bedrock must be confirmed in the proposed infiltration areas to ensure infiltration is not being proposed within 3 feet of the seasonally high water table or bedrock. This information should be obtained from a soil boring investigation. Soil classifications from the investigation can be used for preliminary design purposes. Soil borings should extend to a minimum of 5 feet below the bottom of the infiltration practice. The lowest (i.e. most restrictive) infiltration rate within 5 feet shall be used for design purposes. 6. Because the entire site is underlain by the infiltration area, confirmation of design infiltration rates during construction should be completed. The infiltration system needs to be confirmed that it will function as it was designed with preliminary estimates. This can be accomplished by performing infiltration testing, such as double ring infiltrometer tests. The MPCA guide for determining the number of infiltration tests and borings is provided here: 7rereaitormwater control measure (BMF)(ft) i000 to 5000 50M to 40000 (>1©U00 borings Fits Fermeameter tests 5 2 2 10 3 3 15 41 41 202 'an additional soil boring or pit should be completed for each additional 2,509 fr above 12,500 fit= tan additional five permeameter tests should be completed for each additional 3,W ft2 alawe 15,004 dtt KA02596420\Admin\Docs\050817 submittal\SpaethDrainageReview 053117.doa Spaeth Industrial Park May 31, 2017 Page 3 7. Soils that have infiltration rates more than 8.3 inches per hour must be amended to slow the infiltration rate below 8.3 inches per hour, per the CSWGP. The CSWGP does allow for the local unit of government (the City) flexibility with this rate criteria. 8. Provide rational method calculations confirming adequacy of the storm sewer design for the 10 -year storm event. Calculations should adhere to the following guidelines: • The rational method runoff coefficient (c) is designated by land use and should be assigned a value no less than 0.7. • Minimum allowable velocity in closed conduit = 3.0 fps • Maximum allowable velocity in closed conduit = 12.0 fps 9. Rate control is assumed to be accommodated in the existing north -south ditch/channel and downstream pond located on the north side of Chelsea Road, just west of Fallon Avenue at the City's water reservoir site. The applicant has indicated they are providing rate control with the infiltration system and shall revise the system as needed. 10. Grading, drainage and erosion control shall comply with City's zoning ordinance. See Chapter 4, section 4.10 related to grading, drainage, stormwater management and erosion control and the City's Design Manual- updated May 2017 located on the City's website- Engineering department. HvdroCAD Model 11. The proposed stoimwater management system (as it currently is designed) should be modeled with a starting water elevation of 958.7 feet for establishing the 100 year HWL elevation. 12. Proposed discharge rates exceed existing in the 2 -year event. Rates should be summarized at each point of discharge from the site (North, East and South). 13. Time of concentrations should be updated to more accurately reflect the proposed subcatchments based on land cover and average slope. 14. There is a discrepancy in the primary outlet device from Pond Pl, labelled 15" in the model and 18" in the plans. If the pipe is designed to be an 18 -inch RCP, additional rip -rap is required (3.6 CY rather than 2.9 CY). SWPPP Refer to the MPCA's SWPPP Checklist for a complete list of requirements. 15. Describe the procedures to amend the SWPPP and establish additional ESC BMPs as necessary. 16. Describe methods used to minimize soil compaction and preserve topsoil K:\02596420\Admin\Docs\050817 submittal\SpaethDmInageReview 053117.do Spaeth Industrial Park May 31, 2017 Page 4 17. Since 1 acre or more of the site is being disturbed, a NPDES/SDS Construction Storm Water General Permit and SWPPP shall be provided with the grading permit or with the building permit application for review, prior to construction commencing. 18. The SWPPP mentions select roof drainage is directed to the wetland adjacent to the south property boundary. This note is incorrect. Site Plan 19. Provide a truck turning template for a semi -truck accessing the truck access areas on the site. The applicant has indicated that semi trucks will not be entering the site, however it does, the City would like a template showing how circulation will be accomplished and the ability for trucks to be contained within the curbed area. Grading and Drainage Plan 20. Clearly define an emergency overflow elevation (EOF) on the plans. Sanitary and Water Utilitv Plan 21. A note should be added to the plans that the City will not be responsible for any additional costs incurred that is associated with variations in the utility as -built elevations. These elevations shall be verified in the field prior to construction. 22. The development agreement will include language on City maintenance of the sanitary sewer mainline and watermain system within the site. 23. A utility excavation permit must be obtained from the Public Works department prior to commencement of utility connections. 24. Provide an as -built utility plan once construction is complete. Storm Sewer Utilitv Plan 25. Confirm that the HDPE perforated pipe being proposed under pavement throughout the site is designed to handle the loads it will experience. 26. Label the storm sewer pipe between CB -3 and CB -5. Site Details 27. It is recommended to add a trash guard for flared end sections per City Detail 4007. 28. Include City Detail 6003- Mud Mat Construction Entrance. K:\02596420\Admin\Docs\050817 submittal\Spaeth Dr inageRevie% 053117.doa Spaeth Industrial Park May 31, 2017 Page 5 29. Include City Detail 30. Applicable detail plates shall be updated per the City's April 2017 General Specifications and Standard Detail Plates for Street and Utility Construction located on the City's website- Engineering department. Please have the applicant provide a written response addressing the comments above. Please give me a call at 763-271-3236 if you have any questions or comments regarding this letter. Thank you. Sincerely, WSB & Associates, Inc. Shibani K. Bisson, PE City Engineer cc: Steve Grittman, NAC skb K:\0259"20\Admin\Docs\0508175ubmittal\SpaethDrainageReview 053117.doa t ;•«.- =..r i �'� �r Jst <rtt w... 4',t• ra la-:.. � •tr« i •{���a`.,, . .- . 41. ;'•i/r9 .7 �{:;e � _'`. 'i'r �:! .•�`r T e«."•'• +•1��� . -. - .. ..�ra - 1Qwk • f� >�<-tit ' }'- � • .t�„ ` '�t ..`, •w ! , �, tt ,r•'�''. :i"<'"1's: i� p tl�►r ,ri �:. i1, •'".: �• ,t►+. `�. _ - m s s, • t"iit T's".�v�i ., r" •ii � , c � a M � ' • • i �.'r , � is ir•�, r1 >•�/�+. �`f t AMoCIiiAo City of Monticello — Stormwater Site Plan Review 107 Dundas Road, Address: Monticello, MN Permit No: PID: I Date Approved: Date Received: 5/12/2017 Signature: Area of Site Size (acres): 14.40 Disturbance(acres): 1 4.60 ExistingI Proposed Impervious (acres): 0.06 Impervious (acres): 1 3.38 A Stormwater Management Plan is required for: Any land disturbing activity that may ultimately result in the addition of one acre or greater of impervious surfaces, including smaller individual sites that are part of a common plan of development that may be constructed at different times. The construction of any new public or private road; or - Any land disturbance activity, regardless of size, that the City determines is likely to cause an adverse impact to an environmentally sensitive area or other property. Submittals Received Date Document Author 5/8/17 Preliminary Plat, Spaeth Industrial Park Scott Dahlke, Civil Engineering Site Design 5/8/17 Civil Site Plans, Spaeth Industrial Park Scott Dahlke, Civil Engineering Site Design 5/Scott Dahlke, Civil8;'17 Drainage Analysis, Spaeth Industrial Park Engineering Site Design 5/5/17I Spaeth Project Narrative I Ken Spaeth, Ken Spaeth Masonry General Site Plan Yes No 1. Scale of Survey. Minimum scale 1" = 50'. Maximum size plan sheet 24" x 36" ® ❑ 2. Survey signed by a registered survey with elevations in NGVD-1929 datum for the following locations: • Each lot corner ® ❑ • Grade elevation at the foundation and elevation of top of foundation of structures on N ❑ adjacent lots • Grade elevation at the foundation, elevation of top of foundation and garage floor of © ❑ proposed new construction • Lowest point of entry (i.e. door sill or top of window well) of proposed and existing © 7 construction • Lowest floor of proposed and existing construction ® ❑ 3. Any proposed retaining wall must have a top and bottom elevation and bottom elevation ❑ ❑ would be finish grade. Also, no retaining wall is allowed to be built on private property October 2016 4. Retaining walls greater than 4.0 feet in height have been designed and certified by a ❑ ❑ licensed professional engineer and a building permit has been acquired 9. Waste control 5. All drainage and utility easements are shown? N ❑ 6. Easements are clear of any encroachments? N ❑ 7. New curb cuts proposed? ❑ ❑ 8. If new curb cut is proposed, stamp all survey maps with the curb cut stamp. Also, write a N ❑ note on the Residential Plan & Routing Approval form reminding the builder that a curb ❑ ❑ cut permit is required if the driveway is moved or a new driveway is added N ❑ 9. Low floor a minimum of 4.25' (feet) above the sanitary sewer invert elevation N ❑ Comments: N ❑ Erosion/Sediment Control Plan Yes 1. SWPPP notes provided on the plan 2. Temporary stabilization measures provided 3. Erosion control blankets provided on all slopes greater than 3:1 4. Perimeter Control i.e., Silt Fence, Filter Log, etc. 5. Phasing for sites that are > 1 acre 6. CB Inlet Protection 7. Dewatering 8. Sediment control 9. Waste control 10. Concrete washout 11. Rock entrance N N El N N 12. Street sweeping schedule ❑ 13. Permanent restoration plan N 14. Erosion protection at all outlet pipes N 15. SWPPP includes an erosion and sediment control inspection schedule and person ❑ responsible for maintenance Comments: A street sweeping schedule needs to be added to the SWPPP. FI Provide the name and contact information of the person responsible for SWPPP implementation and long term operations and maintenance of the permanent stormwater management system, including certification number. Stormwater Management Plan '1 Yes 4 No 4 1. Delineation maps for existing and proposed conditions N ❑ 2. Modeling calculations for existing and proposed conditions using Atlas 14 storm events with an MSE3 type distribution. • 2 year 24 hr. (2.84"), 10 year 24 hr. (4.22"), 100 (6.87"), 10 -day snowmelt (7.211) N ❑ • Modeled direct connected impervious separate N ❑ 3. Off-site drainage included N ❑ 4. Wetlands shown on plans and wetland permitting completed ❑ N 5. Pretreatment N ❑ October 2016 6. Skimmer structures provided on the outlets of all ponds. ❑ ❑ 7. Soil borings ❑ N 8. Design Infiltration Rate Determination — Geotechnical Report or Infiltration Testing ❑ ❑ 8. Proposed ponds meet or exceed NURP design criteria provided ❑ 9. If infiltration of LF' is not feasible, water quality goals are met with NURP pond on site? 9. Seasonal High Water Elevation ❑ 10. Open channel flow calculations ❑ 171 11. Storm sewer calculations — 10 year event ❑ N 12. Narrative describing the following: a. Existing Conditions: Yes b. Proposed Conditions: Yes c. Stormwater Management for Proposed Site: Yes Comments: Separation distance from bottom of infiltration features to seasonally high water table and bedrock must be determined. Amended soils are being proposed within infiltration basin, but soil borings should be taken to confirm infiltration rates of the soils surrounding the perforated pipe (MRCS soil survey indicates HSG B) Provide operation and maintenance plans for the sumps and infiltration system. Water Quality and Volume Reduction "The Chy of Monticello has adopted MPC4 Minimal Impact Design Standards in Chapter 4 of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Section 4.10. MIDs Infiltration design criteria as described in the MPC4 Stormwater Manual .shall be followed for the proposed project. " Yes 4 No � 1. Volume control provided as per the City's Engineering Design Standards and M1DS (1.1" ® ❑ over new impervious surface) 2. Impervious area equal to or greater than the net increase in impervious surface is routed ® ❑ through infiltration BMP 3. Sequencing provided for alternatives where infiltration is infeasible ❑ ❑ 13494 4. Required Volume Reduction: Cf 5. Provided Volume Reduction: 35993cf 6. Separation to groundwater and/or bedrock is a minimum of 3 feet from bottom of ❑ infiltration BMP 7. Drawdown time for infiltration BMP is within 48 hours N ❑ 8. Proposed ponds meet or exceed NURP design criteria ❑ ❑ 9. If infiltration of LF' is not feasible, water quality goals are met with NURP pond on site? ❑ ❑ Comments: Rate Control I Yes J No 4 1 October 2016 1. Peak Proposed Discharge Rates < Existing ❑ N 2. Existing infrastructure can accommodate peak discharge rates for 10 year storm? ❑ ❑ 3. Existing infrastructure and EOF for proposed 100 year peak discharge rate? ❑ N 4. Proposed flow patterns do not create flooding impacts for structures adjacent to the N ❑ property? Comments: Rates exceeded in 2 -year event Provide rational storm sewer design sheet to demonstrate existing infrastructure can accommodate peak discharge rates for 10 -year Define an EOF for 100 -year event Yes J No 1. Building Opening: • 2' above the critical 100 -yr HWL of local basins, wetlands, & infiltration basins N ❑ • 2' above EOF of local basins, wetlands, & infiltration basins N ❑ • 2' above the 100 -yr flow elevation of a swale or channel at the point where the swale N ❑ channel is closest to the building 2. Low Floor Elevation: • 2' above the critical 100 -yr HWL of major basins N ❑ • 2' above EOF of major basins ® ❑ • For landlocked basins: 2' above the HWL from back to back 100 -yr rainfalls or 2' above the HWL from the 100 -yr 10 -day snowmelt, whichever is higher. Starting elevation of the basin/waterbody prior to runoff is one of the following: o Existing Ordinary High Water level established by the Minnesota Department ❑ ❑ of Natural Resources o Annual water balance calculation approved by the City ❑ ❑ o Local observation well records, as approved by the City ❑ ❑ o Mottled soil ❑ ❑ October 2016 City Council Agenda: 07/24/17 2I. Consideration of authorizing a vavment of to the Coalition of Utility Cities for citv share of CUC membership dues in the amount of $26,418 (JO) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: City Council is asked to consider granting formal approval of payment of 2017 membership dues relating to participation in the Coalition of Utility Cities organization in the amount of $26,418 As you know, the Coalition of Utility Cities is comprised of communities that host nuclear and coal generation facilities. For years, the host communities in this organization have pooled their resources in support of maintaining a coordinated and unified voice at the State Legislature on issues of common concern. The subject matter most commonly addressed by the organization, that have a direct impact on host communities pertain to property valuation and taxation along with environmental and regulatory topics. For more detail regarding coalition objectives and activities, see the annual report at the end of the agenda. As you may recall, last year and the year before, the CUC lobbyist was highly involved in development of legislation that would have had a major impact on the method used for establishing valuation of electrical generation facilities. This legislation has not been adopted by the State Legislature but remains in play so it is very important to monitor and help to shape the law. You may recall at a meeting early in 2017, Carol Jackson, our representative from Flaherty Hood provided a presentation on the activities of the Coalition in 2016 along with plans for 2017. Her presentation outlined the Coalition mission and activities.. Investment in CUC is akin to having good insurance program. In the face of efforts of others to erode host community tax base, it can be shown that over the years, the investment in CUC and associated legislative efforts, has resulted in preservation or a reduction in the diminishment of tax revenue for host communities. Thus the CUC investment serves to pay for itself. The bulk of the funding goes toward paying for the services of Flaherty Hood which serves as the organization's legislative consultant. The annual contribution share is based on the relative value of the electrical generation facilities in each community. It is the intent of the group to continue to maintain a pattern of asking for an annual appropriation from each City based on a projected budget, but provide a reimbursement to member cities when the fund balance hits a certain threshold. Based on the 2017/18 budget .the projected reimbursement is $20,956 which will result in a net cost of $5,462. Al. Budget Impact: This expenditure was included in the budget. Host city dues are established based on the tax capacity value of the facility located in the host city. City Council Agenda: 07/24/17 A2. Staff Workload Impact: Participation in at least three regular meetings per year. Additional impromptu meetings are scheduled as needed. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve payment to the Coalition of Utility Cities in the amount of $26,418 for CUC membership dues for 2016/2017. 2. Motion of other. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends Alternative #1. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. CUC Dues statement B. CUC Annual Meeting Info (Included at the end of Agenda packet) Coalition of Utility Cities - Dues Based on Actual Pay 2017 Total dues of $95,000 each city's assessment is based on: * A 1,250 base fee (currently there are 7 members for a total base fee of $8,750) * The remaining amount of the assessment comes from a percentage of the city's electric generation machinery market * The remaining amount is calculated by subtracting the total base fee from the total dues ($95,000 minus $8,750=$86,250) and creating a uniform percentage of market value so that the percentage times the market values in each city equals a sum total of $91,250 (the portion of dues not covered in the base fee). Elec. Gen. Est. Mkt Value for CUC Members Dues Pay 17 Becker $ 461,789,900 Cohasset $ 326,264,100 Granite Falls $ 3,664,900 Hoyt Lakes $ 29,473,000 Monticello $ 704,557,800 Oak Park Heights $ 191,881,900 Red Wing $ 696,778,700 Approved Assessment 1 $2,414,410,3001 Total dues of $95,000 each city's assessment is based on: * A 1,250 base fee (currently there are 7 members for a total base fee of $8,750) * The remaining amount of the assessment comes from a percentage of the city's electric generation machinery market * The remaining amount is calculated by subtracting the total base fee from the total dues ($95,000 minus $8,750=$86,250) and creating a uniform percentage of market value so that the percentage times the market values in each city equals a sum total of $91,250 (the portion of dues not covered in the base fee). 0.003572301% Base Fee of Generating Mach Dues MV $1,250 $16,497 $17,747 $1,250 $11,655 $12,905 $1,250 $131 $1,381 $1,250 $1,053 $2,303 $1,250 $25,169 $26,419 $1,250 $6,855 $8,105 $1,250 $24,891 $26,141 $8,750 1 $86,250 1 $95,000 Total dues of $95,000 each city's assessment is based on: * A 1,250 base fee (currently there are 7 members for a total base fee of $8,750) * The remaining amount of the assessment comes from a percentage of the city's electric generation machinery market * The remaining amount is calculated by subtracting the total base fee from the total dues ($95,000 minus $8,750=$86,250) and creating a uniform percentage of market value so that the percentage times the market values in each city equals a sum total of $91,250 (the portion of dues not covered in the base fee). City Council Agenda: 7/24/2017 2J. Consideration of approving lighting upgrades in the communitv center gvm for $9,750.00, community center indoor plavground for $3,010.00 and Hi-Wav Liquors for $10,055.58 (total $22,815.58). (AM) REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: City Council is asked to consider approving lighting upgrades in the MCC gym, MCC indoor playground, and Hi -Way Liquors. The lighting upgrade will consist of replacing the current lighting with an energy efficient LED system. Energy paybacks and rebate information are attached. Quotes have been requested from three contractors and two have been received for the lighting upgrade work. The lowest bid is highlighted in yellow. The goal is to have the entire project finished in August of this year. These quotes were received as follows: Quotes for Lighting Upgrade Project CONTRACTOR DESCRIPTION TOTAL QUOTE Donovan Construction Replace the current lighting MCC Gym: $19,656.00 with energy efficient LED MCC Indoor Playground: lighting for the MCC gym, $3,800.00 MCC indoor playground, and Liquor Store: $11,954.00 liquor store. Wes Olson Replace the current lighting MCC Gym: $9,750.00 with energy efficient LED MCC Indoor Playground: lighting for the MCC gym, $3,010.00 MCC indoor playground, and Liquor Store: $10,055.58 liquor store. Olson and Sons Electric Replace the current lighting No quote received. with energy efficient LED lighting for the MCC gym, MCC indoor playground, and liquor store. Al. Budget Impact: The 2017 MCC budget includes $42,500.00 for building repairs and maintenance. Amounts expended above the budget are financed through the fund balance (prior year accumulation of revenues in excess of expenditures). Hi -Way Liquors has sufficiently budgeted for this item through repairs/maintenance and capital improvements. A2. Staff Workload Impact: Staff time will include overseeing the project and working with the contractor to finalize the project. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: Motion to approve lighting upgrades in the community center gym for $9,750.00, City Council Agenda: 7/24/2017 indoor playground for $3,010.00, and Hi -Way Liquors for $10,055.58 (total $22,815.58) by the lowest bidders as highlighted in yellow as identified in the previous tables. 2. Motion to deny. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends Alternative 1. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Quotes B. Energy payback and rebate information 2 to, XceiEnergys 911FORSIBLI !Y N,1PUII1- Lighting Upgrades Total Installed Cost Before rebate Your Final Cost After rebate d Rebate equals 36% of installed cost. One -Stop Efficiency Shop Summary of Recommended Lighting Upgrades Estimated Estimated Costs Annual Savin¢s Pavback $10,055.58 $3,644.95 $6,410.63 $2,595.66(x) 2.5 years (Including special orders) *Job must be completed and invoices submitted within 90 days or by 1010112017, whichever comes first One -Stop reserves the right to withdraw this rebate offer after expiration. You may request an extension, which includes re - verification of eligibility, kW/kWh savings, installation costs, estimated rebate, and program rules by One -Stop. CEE Financing Option Estimated monthly savings $216.30 (a) Monthly loan payments at 3.9% for 32 month term $219.52(b) 2.7 years (b) Estimate based on a loan amount of $6,610.63, including a $200.00 loan origination fee. Mortgage, (Including Loan flood and title fees may apply. The loan term has a maximum of 5 years, with monthly payments not less Financing Charges) than the estimated monthly savings. Final terms and conditions set by lender upon loan approval. Utility Cost Analvsis Demand (KW) Energy (KWb) Existing Lights 9.892 New Lights 3.379 Estimated Savings 6.513(a) 50,708 17,634 Anntial cost. 4,127.27 33,073 $29595.66(a)t CO2 (lbs) . 86,203 29,979 56,225. * How do CO2 emissions affect me and my business? 9 Rising concentrations of greenhouse gasses (GHG) produce an Increase in the average surface temperature of the Earth over time. Rising temperatures produce changes in precipitation patterns, storm severity, and sea level commonly referred to as "climate change." ¶ Carbon dioxide (CO2), methane, nitrous oxide and four groups of fluorinated gases (sulfur hexafluoride, HFCs, PFCs and CFCs) are the major GHG. In the U.S., GHG emissions come primarily from the combustion of fossil fuels in energy use. CO2 emissions from coal-fired electricity generation comprise nearly 80 percent of the total CO2 emissions produced by the generation of electricity in the U.S. ¶ Installing energy-efficient lighting and implementing other conservation measures that reduce electric energy use significantly reduces GHG emmissions and mitigates global climate change. Read more at: www.eia.doe.gov or wvaw.epa.gov (a) Savings estimates are based on standard engineering calculations and are NOT guaranteed. Your actual savings may be higher or lower depending on various factors, including how you operate your lights and other electric equipment in your building. Electric Utility Rates = $0.0620/KWh and $13.11/KW, whore Demand cost savings occurs primarily during the summer months peak rate hours of 9am to 9pm. (11 [00,001 [01 [00,001 [00] [False] [3.464KW] ) Liquor Store City of Monticello -v2 WesOlson Program 1134 Xcel Acct# 515 Pill Page 2 Customer Repoli (07/07/2017 15:42) 1 -79070 11 302425130 1 Monticello, MN 55362 Xcel Energys RtIPOMfIi AA RY NAFRAE' One -Stop Efficiency Shop Summary of Recommended Lighting Upgrades Lighting Upgrades Estimated Estimated Costs Annual Savines Pavback Total Installed Cost Before rebate $11,954.00 Utility Rebati $3,295.44 Your Final Cost After rebate $8,658.56 $2,464.22(4) 3.5 years b Rebate equals 28% of installed cost. (Including special orders) *Job must be completed and invoices submitted within 90 days or by 1010112017, whichever comes first. One -Stop reserves the right to withdraw this rebate offer after expiration. You may request an extension, which includes re - verification of eligibility, kl kWh savings, installation costs, estimated rebate, and program rules by One -Stop. CEE Financing Option Estimated monthly savings $205.35(a) Monthly loan payments at 3.9% for 46 month term $209.21(b) 3.9 years (b) Estimate based on a loan amount of $8,858.56, including a $200.00 loan origination fee. Mortgage, (Including Loan flood and title fees may apply. The loan term has a maximum of 5 years, with monthly payments not less Financing Charges) than the estimated monthly savings. Final terms and conditions set by lender upon loan approval. Utility Cost Analysis., Demand (KW) Energy (KWh) Annual Cost; Existing Lights New Lights Estimated Savings ,9.770 3.741 6.029(a) 50,173 $4,094.14„ . 19,220 $1,629.92 30,953 $2,464.22(a)t ',;' CO2 (lbs) 85,295 32,674 52,621 * How do CO2 emissions affect me and my business? $ Rising concentrations of greenhouse gasses (GHG) produce an Increase in the average surface temperature of the Earth over time. Rising temperatures produce changes in precipitation patterns, storm severity, and sea level commonly referred to as "climate change." $ Carbon dioxide (CO2), methane, nitrous oxide and four groups of fluorinated gases (sulfur hexafluoride, HFCs, PFCs and CFCs) are the major GHG. In the U.S., GHG emissions come primarily from the combustion of fossil fuels in energy use. CO2 emissions from coal-fired electricity generation comprise nearly 80 percent of the total CO2 emissions produced by the generation of electricity in the U.S. $ Installing energy-efficient lighting and Implementing other conservation measures that reduce electric energy use significantly reduces GHG emmissions and mitigates global climate change. Read more at: www.eia.doe.gov, or w .epa.gov (a) Savings estimates are based on standard engineering calculations and are NOT guaranteed. Your actual savings may be higher or lower depending on various factors, including how you operate your lights and other electric equipment in your building. Electric Utility Rates = $0.0620/KWh and $13.11/KW, where Demand cost savings occurs primarily during the summer months peak rate hours of gam to 9pm. (12 [12,12 ] [0] [00,00] [00] [True] [3.464KW] ) Liquor Store City of Monticello -Donovan Program 113q Xcel Acct# 515 Pine St Page 2 Customer Report (07/07/2017 15:26) 1 -79070 11 302425130 1 Monticello, MN 55362 XcelEnergyo SeNtON1late SY NAID"t. One -Stop Efficiency Shop Summary of Recommended Lighting Upgrades Estimated Estimated Lighting Upgrades Costs Annual Savinias Payback Total Installed Cost Before rebate $9,750.00 Utility Rebate* $5,850.00 Your Final Cost After rebate $3,900.00 $3,624.79(a) 1.1 years d Rebate equals 60% of installed cost. (Including special orders) *Job must be completed and invoices submitted within 90 days or by 1010112017, whichever comes first One -Stop reserves the right to withdraw this rebate offer after expiration. You may request an extension, which includes re- verdfcation of eligibility, kWlltWh savings, installation costs, estimated rebate, and program rules by One -Stop. CEE Financing Option Estimated monthly savings $302.07(1) Monthly loan payments at 3.9% for 13 month term $325.17(b) 1.2 years (b) Estimate based on a loan amount of $4,100.00, including a $200.00 loan origination fee. Mortgage, (Including loan flood and title fees may apply. The loan term has a maximum of 5 years, with monthly payments not less f=inancing Charges) than the estimated monthly savings. Final terms and conditions set by lender upon loan approval. Utility Cost Analysis Demand (KW) Energy(KWb) Annual Cost CO2 (lbs)',' Existing Lights 10.896 59,656 $5,413.33 101,415 New Lights 3.600 19,710 $1,788.54 33,507 Estimated Savings 7.296 39,946 $3,624.79(°)/ 67,908 . * How do CO2 emissions affect me and my business? ¶ Rising concentrations of greenhouse gasses (GHG) produce an increase in the average surface temperature of the Earth over time. Rising temperatures produce changes In precipitation patterns, storm severity, and sea level commonly referred to as 'climate change." ¶ Carbon dioxide (CO2), methane, nitrous oxide and four groups of fluorinated gases (sulfur hexafluoride, HFCs, PFCs and CFCs) are the major GHG. In the U.S., GHG emissions come primarily from the combustion of fossil fuels in energy use. CO2 emissions from coal-fired electricity generation comprise nearly 80 percent of the total CO2 emissions produced by the generation of electricity in the U.S. I Installing energy-efficient lighting and implementing other conservation measures that reduce electric energy use significantly reduces GHG emmissions and mitigates global climate change. Read more at: www.eia.doe.gov or www.epa.gov (a) Savings estimates arc based on standard engineering calculations and are NOT guaranteed. Your actual savings may be higher or lower depending on various factors, including how you operate your lights and other electric equipment in your building. Electric Utility Rates = $0.0620/KWh and $13.11/KW, where Demand cost savings occurs primarily during the summer months peak rate hours of 9am to 9pm. (t l [06,03 ] [0] [00,00] [00] [True] [7.296KW] ) City of Monticello City Hall -Phase 2-Gym-WesOlson Program ID# Xcel Acct# 505 Walnut St Page 2 Customer Report (07/07/2017 15:39) 1 -64222 11 303021733 1 Monticello, MN 55362 a,lSra Nilett sr N,rrael- Recommended Lighting System Upgrades Area A: Gym Lights Project., 91 Qty Watts EXISTING Luminaire 24 454 MH 40OW STD1 1 L Totals (Including special orders) Page 3 Customer Report (07/07/2017 15:40) One -Stop Efficiency Shop Recommended Lighting Projects Schedule Name Installed Estimated & Hours/year Cost Annual Selected of Operation (Without Rebate) 'I, Savings 15 H5,475 ours per Day x 7 $9,75Incl Spec 51000 ar $3,624.79 rg❑Q Qty Watts NEW Luminaire 24 150 LED High Bay Fixture 150W- $9,750.00 $3,624.79 City of Monticello City Hall -Phase 2-Gym-WesOlson Piogi am IDR Xcel Acctld 505 Walnut St 1 -64222 11 303021733 1 Monticello, MN 55362 XcelEnergys 111#0Ntllrtl IT NkPa Al• Lighting Upgrades Total Installed Cost Before rebate Your Final Cost After rebate b Rebate equals 33% of installed cost. One -Stop Efficiency Shop Summary of Recommended Lighting Upgrades Estimated Estimated Costs Annual Savings Pavback $19,656.00 $6,544.51 $13,111.49 $3,624.79(``) 3.6 years (Including special orders) *Job must be completed and invoices submitted within 90 days or by 1 010112 01 7, whichever comes first. One -Stop reserves the right to withdraw this rebate offer after expiration. You may request an extension, which includes re - verification of eligibility, kW9(Wh savings, installation costs, estimated rebate, and program rules by One -Stop. CEE Financing Option Estimated monthly savings $302.07(a) Monthly loan payments at 3.9% for 47 month term $308.17(b) 4.0 years (b) Estimate based on a loan amount of $13,311.49, including a $200.00 loan origination fee. Mortgage, (Including Loan flood and title fees may apply. The loan term has a maximum of 5 years, with monthly payments not less Financing charges) than the estimated monthly savings. Fina) terms and conditions set by lender upon loan approval. Utility Cost Analysis Demand (KW) Energy (KWh) Annual Cost CO2 (lbs) Existing Lights 10.896 59,656 $5,413.33', 101,415 New Lights 3,600 19,710 $1;788.54 33,507 Estimated Savings 7.296 39,946 $3,624179(°)4 67,908* * How do CO2 emissions affect me and my business? I Rising concentrations of greenhouse gasses (GHG) produce an increase in the average surface temperature of the Earth over time. Rising temperatures produce changes in precipitation patterns, storm severity, and sea level commonly referred to as "climate change." I Carbon dioxide (CO2), methane, nitrous oxide and four groups of fluorinated gases (sulfur hexafluoride, HFCs, PFCs and CFCs) are the major GHG. In the U.S., GHG emissions come primarily from the combustion of fossil fuels in energy use. CO2 emissions from coal-fired electricity generation comprise nearly 80 percent of the total CO2 emissions produced by the generation of electricity In the U.S. I Installing energy-efficient lighting and implementing other conservation measures that reduce electric energy use significantly reduces GHG emmisslons and mitigates global climate change. Read more at: wvnv.eia.doe.gov or www.epa.gov (a) Savings estimates are based on standard engineering calculations and are NOT guaranteed. Your actual savings may be higher or lower depending on various factors, including how you operate your lights and other electric equipment in your building. Electric Utility Rates = $0.0620/KWh and $13.11/KW, where Demand cost savings occurs primarily during the summer months peak rate hours of 9am to 9pm. (12 [12,12 ] [0] [00,00] [00] [True] [7.296KW] ) City of Monticello City Hall -Phase 2 -Gym -Donovan Xcel Acct# 505 Walnut St 303021733 Monticello, MN 55362 Page 2 Customer Report (07/07/2017 15:29) Program ID# 64222 �I ' Xcel Energy' One -Stop Efficiency Shop 111#4144 Ill1 8Y NBraa!- Recommended Lighting Projects City of Monticello City Hall -Phase 2 -Gym -Donovan Program ID# Xcel Acct# 505 Walnut Sl Page 3 Customer Report (07/07/2017 15:30) 1 64222 11 303021733 1 Monticello, MN 55362 Schedule Name Installed Estimated Recommended Lighting System Upgrades & Hours/year Cost Annual Selected of Operation (Without Rebate) Savings Area A: Gym Lights Project: #1 15 Hours per Day x 7 $19,656.00 $3,624.79 0 5,475 hrs/yr Incl Special Order FQty Watts EXISTING Luminaire Qty Watts NEW Luminaire 24 454 MH 40OW STD1 1L 24 150 LED High Bay Fixture 150W- Totals (Including special orders) $19,656.00 $3,624.79 City of Monticello City Hall -Phase 2 -Gym -Donovan Program ID# Xcel Acct# 505 Walnut Sl Page 3 Customer Report (07/07/2017 15:30) 1 64222 11 303021733 1 Monticello, MN 55362 At It ON t l ite NY Her II A I" Lighting Upgrades Total Installed Cost Before rebate Your Final Cost After rebate d Rebate equals 60% of installed cosi. One -Stop Efficiency Shop Summary of Recommended Lighting Upgrades Estimated Estimated Costs Annual Savines Pavback $3,010.00 $1,806.00 $1,204.00 $1,129.76(a) 1.1 years (Including special orders) *Job must be completed and invoices submitted within 90 days or by 1010112017, whichever comes first. One -Stop reserves the right to withdraw this rebate offer after expiration. You may request all extension, which includes re - verification of eligibility, kW/kWh savings, installation costs, estimated rebate, and program rules by One -Stop. CEE Financing Option Estimated monthly savings $94.15 (a) Monthly loan payments at 3.9% for 15 month term $96.81(b) 1.3 years (b) Estimate based on a loan amount of $1,404.00, including a $200.00 loan origination fee. Mortgage, (Including Loan flood and title fees may apply. The loan term has a maximum of 5 years, with monthly payments not less Financing Charges) than the estimated monthly savings. Final terms and conditions set by lender upon loan approval. Utility Cost Analvsls Demand (KW) Energy (KWh) Annpal.Cost CO2 (Ilrs) Existing Lights 2.724 14,914 ` .'- $'d;353,:33 :, - 25,554 " New Lights 0.450 2,464 $223,.57 41188 Estimated Savings 2.274 12,450 $1129.76 (a)t : 21,165 * How do CO2 emissions affect me and my business? $ Rising concentrations of greenhouse gasses (GHG) produce an increase In the average surface temperature of the Earth over time. Rising temperatures produce changes in precipitation patterns, storm severity, and sea level commonly referred to as "climate change." $ Carbon dioxide (CO2), methane, nitrous oxide and four groups of fluorinated gases (sulfur hexafluorlde, HFCs. PFCs and CFCs) are the major GHG. In the U.S., GHG emissions come primarily from the combustion of fossil fuels in energy use. CO2 emissions from coal-fired electricity generation comprise nearly 80 percent of the total CO2 emissions produced by the generation of electricity in the U.S. $ Installing energy-efficient lighting and implementing other conservation measures that reduce electric energy use significantly reduces GHG emmissions and mitigates global climate change. Read more at: www.ela.doe.gov or www.epa.gov (a) Savings estimates are based on standard engineering calculations and are NOT guaranteed. Your actual savings may be higher or lower depending on various factors, including how you operate your lights and other electric equipment in your building. Electric Utility Rates = $0.0620/KWh and $13.11/KW, where Demand cost savings occurs primarily during the summer months peak rate hours of 9am to Spm. (I1 [00,00 ] [01 [00,00] [00] [True] [2.274KW] ) City of Monticello City Hall -Indoor Playground -Wes Program IDH Xcel Acct! 505 Walnut St Page 2 Customer Repoli (07/07/2017 15:37) 1 -64222 11 303021733 1 Monticello, MN 55362 xcelEnergy° senaw:nde aw xarune• Recommended Lighting System Upgrades Area A: Indoor Playground Lights Project: #1 Qty Watts EXISTING Luminaire 6 454 MH 40OW STD1 1 L- Totals (Inchiding special orders) Page 3 Customer Report (07/07/2017 15:37) One -Stop Efficiency Shop Recommended Lighting Projects Schedule Name Installed & Hours/year Cost of Operation (Without Rebate) 15 Hours per Day x 7 I $3,010.00 5,475 hrs/yr Incl Special Order I Qty Watts NEW Luminaire 3 150 LED High Bay Flxture 150W- $3,010.00 Estimated Annual Selected Savings $1,129.76 $1,129.76 City of Monticello City Hall -Indoor Playground -Wes Program ID# Xeel Acct# 505 Walnut St 1 -64222 11 303021733 1 Monticello, MN 55362 Xcel Energy° A ri f 9Ms l IL! AT I r a ne" One -Stop Efficiency Shop Summary of Recommended Lighting Upgrades Lighting Upgrades Estimated Estimated g g pg Costs Annual Savines Payback Total Installed Cost Before rebate $3,800.00 Utility Rebate* $2,039.78 Your Final Cost After rebate $1,760.22 $1,129.76(a) 1.6 years b Rebate equals 54% of installed cost. (Including special orders) *Job must be completed and invoices submitted within 90 days or by 1 010112 01 7, whichever comes first. One -Stop reserves the right to withdraw this rebate offer after expiration. You may request an extension, which includes re - verification of eligibility, MIM savings, installation costs, estimated rebate, and program rules by One -Stop. CEE Financing Option Estimated monthly savings $94.15 (a) Monthly loan payments at 3.9% for 21 month term $97.48"' 1.8 years (b) Estimate based on a loan amount of $1,960.22, including a $200.00 loan origination fee. Mortgage, (including Loan flood and title fees may apply. The loan term has a maximum of 5 years, with monthly payments not loss Financing Charges) than the estimated monthly savings. Final terms and conditions set by tender upon loan approval. Utility Cost Analvsls Demand (KW) Energy(KW]i): Annual Cost CO2 (lbs)" .' Existing Lights 2.724 14,914 $1,;35.3.33 25,354' New Lights 0.450 2,464 $223.57', 4,188 Estimated Savings 2.274 12,450 $1,119.76("rA 21,165 . How do CO2 emissions affect me and my business? $ Rising concentrations of greenhouse gasses (GHG) produce an increase in the average surface temperature of the Earth over time. Rising temperatures produce changes in precipitation patterns, storm severity, and sea level commonly referred to as "climate change." $ Carbon dioxide (CO2), methane, nitrous oxide and four groups of fluorinated gases (sulfur hexafluoride, HFCs, PFCs and CFCs) are the major GHG. In the U.S., GHG emissions come primarily from the combustion of fossil fuels in energy use. CO2 emissions from coal-fired electricity generation comprise nearly 80 percent of the total CO2 emissions produced by the generation of electricity in the U.S. $ Installing energy-efficient lighting and implementing other conservation measures that reduce electric energy use significantly reduces GHG emmissions and mitigates global climate change. Read more at: www.ela.doe.gov or www.epa.gov, (a) Savings estimates are based on standard engineering calculations and are NOT guaranteed. Your actual savings may be higher or lower depending on various factors, including how you operate your lights and other electric equipment in your building. Electric Utility Rates = $0.0620/KWh and $13.11/KW, where Demand cost savings occurs primarily during the summer months penk rate hours of 9am to 9pm. (12 [-17,-171 [01 [00,001 [00] [True] [2.274KW] ) City of Monticello City Hall -Ind Playgrd-Donovan Program ID# Xcel Acct# 505 Walnut St Page 2 Customer Report (07/07/2017 15:35) 1 -64222 11 303021733 1 Monticello, MN 55362 XCelEnergyo One -Stop Efficiency Shop NEEPGNSIi EE .r NBraEE. Recommended Lighting Projects City of Monticello City Hall -Ind Playgrd-Donovan Prognun IDR Xcel Ace(# 505 Walnut St Page 3 Customer Report (07/07/2017 15:35) 1 -64222 11 303021733 1 Monticello, MN 55362 Schedule Name hrstalled Estimated Recommended Lighting System Upgrades & Hours/year of Operation Cost (Without Rebnic) Annual Selected Savings Area A: Gym Lights Project: #1 x7 15 Hours5,475 $3,800.00 $1,129.76 Q hrslyry Incl a100 der Qty Watts EXISTING Luminaire Qty Watts NEW Luminaire 6 454 MH 40OW STD1 1L 3 150 LED High Bay Fixture 150W - Totals (Including special orders) $3,800.00 $1,129.76 City of Monticello City Hall -Ind Playgrd-Donovan Prognun IDR Xcel Ace(# 505 Walnut St Page 3 Customer Report (07/07/2017 15:35) 1 -64222 11 303021733 1 Monticello, MN 55362 Lighting upgrades will qualify for significant rebates from Xcel Energy. Below is information showing upgrade costs, rebates and energy payback. Liquor Store: Total Installed cost before rebate: $10,055.58 Utility Rebate: $3,644.95 Final cost after rebate: $6,410.63 Payback: 2.5 years MCC Indoor Playground: Total Installed cost before rebate: $3,010.00 Utility Rebate: $1,806.00 Final Cost after rebate: $1,204.00 Payback: 1.3 years MCC Gvm: Total installed cost before rebate: $9,750.00 Utility Rebate: $5,850.00 Final cost after rebate: $3,900.00 Payback: 1.2 years City Council Agenda: 7/24/2017 2K. Consideration of approving UHL Recommissioning Proposal for cost of $26,900) (AM) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: City Council is asked to consider approving the UHL Recommissioning proposal. UHL is the current provider of our energy management system. Recommissioning typically saves between 15% and 20% of building energy costs, while improving occupant comfort and improving operations. A 15% energy savings based on our current utility cost would be an estimated savings of around $27,000.00 annually. The total cost of the recommissioning is $26,900.00, but we have been pre -approved for $11,075 worth of rebates through Xcel Energy and CenterPoint Energy. Our total cost would then be $15,825.00 for the recommissioning project. The recommissioning will identify energy conservation opportunities (ECOs) that we may implement. There are additional bonus rebates after implementing the energy conservation opportunities from the study totaling $10,000.00. This would reduce our total out of pocket cost to $5,825.00. The implementation will also include an upgrade to our current energy management system which has a cost value of $5,800.00. Partial or complete cost of this upgrade could be offset by completing more of the recommended ECOs and would further reduce our net out of pocket costs. Al. Budget Impact: The 2017 MCC budget includes $42,500.00 for building repairs and maintenance. Amounts expended above the budget are financed through the fund balance (prior year accumulation of revenues in excess of expenditures). A2. Staff Workload Impact: Staff time will include overseeing the project and working with the contractor to finalize the project. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: Motion to approve the UHL Recommissioning proposal for a total of $26,900.00. If Council selects this option the net total would be $15,825.00 after rebates for the recommissioning project with a possible $10,000.00 in additional rebates towards implementation of the ECOs. Total net cost would be $5,825 after implementation rebates. 2. Motion to deny. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends Alternative 1. City Council Agenda: 7/24/2017 D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Recommissioning Flyer B. Return on Investment History Sheet C. Example of Energy Savings Tune-up your building for Peak Efficiency Even if buildings were properly commissioned during their design, construction and start-up phases, as buildings age, changes in their use and operations can usually lead to degraded building performance, especially if proper maintenance is not performed. Re -commissioning consistently saves between 5% and 20% of building energy costs, while improving occupant comfort and improving operations. Xcel Customer Rebates: • Re -Commissioning- Up to 75% of study cost (not to exceed $25,000.) • Implementations rebate with paybacks of 9 months -15 years $400/kW or $0.0456/kWh whichever is greater, with a maximum of 60% of the measure cost. Process Includes: • Executive Summary • Equipment Re -Commissioning • Controls Point to Point Functional Testing • Verification and Calibration • Compare Operation and Control to Original Design Intent • List all Deficiencies with Proposals to Correct • Lighting and Electrical Review • Operations Trends and Data Logging • List of Energy Conservation Measures (ECM) with Proposals to Implement, Energy Reduction, Savings, and Rebates • Current Energy Star Rating • Building's Energy Utility Report using UtilityTrac • Measure Cost Avoidance (Weather Normalized) of Implemented (ECMs) using UtilityTrac Program Energy Recommissioning Study Savings Cost of ECO's Rebate Payback Annual Savings Large Church $144,786 $188,060 $19,007 1.17 37% Medical Center Phase-1 $224,009 $147,130 $46,621 0.45 4% ISafety Training Facility $13,724 $27,865 $5,288 1.60 33% Large Corporate Building $154,257 $79,995 $6,061 0.48 30% Health Clinic $14,671 $13,250 $3,911 0.64 10% Church $8,766 $35,341 $3,276 3.47 22% Large Office Building $119,954 $85,510 $8,734 0.64 8% Large Office Building $3,838 $13,280 $4,764 2.22 5% University Hall $104,095 $175,180 $33,674 1.36 21% Large Corp Office $58,929 $65,590 $3,562 1.05 31% Corporate Plant $124,478 $79,020 $11,263 0.54 10% Park Office Building $21,719 $51,740 $10,462 1.9 30% Large Office Building $190,598 $650,690 $84,125 3.0 28% High School $108,137 $433,280 $52,544 3.6 39% Medical Building $78,793 $184,170 $24,086 2.0 28% Office Building $10,177 $37,201 $9,758 2.7 48% Office Building $18,690 $132,210 $12,513 6.4 38% Medical Center Phase-2 $320,586 $346,709 $25,365 1.0 6% Large Medical Office $80,582 $127,990 $19,281 1.3 22% 1 Middle School $53,861 $162,290 $49,823 2.1 26% Gov. Center $69,141 $68,370 $7,313 0.9 36% Senior Care Center $51,513 $200,720 $21,007 3.5 19% 1Large Corporate Building $202,057 $312,920 $62,730 1.2 9% Office Building $26,427 $63,060 $24,263 1.5 5% Middle School $13,277 $68,290 $12,984 4.2 12% Medical Clinic $38,501 $108,350 $24,413 2.2 21% 1Prison $45,593 $90,280 $29,727 1.3 3% Condo Building $2,697 $17,000 $1,814 5.6 2% Church $24,794 $97,160 $26,975 2.8 19% Library $11,475 $25,400 $8,758 1.5 13% �Elem. School $11,735 $47,050 $14,959 2.7 16% Secondary School $35,724 $138,570 $26,502 3.1 22% Medical Center $47,933 $66,420 $14,387 1.1 30% Hospital $49,232 $97,960 $25,361 1.5 13% Plaza $53,114 $137,062 $18,882 2.2 37% Middle School $56,670 $119,810 $25,918 1.6 27% Tech Center $69,560 $66,150 $14,760 0.7 15% Library $9,528 $12,300 $5,240 0.8 24% Community Center $39,591 $106,810 $37,112 1.8 9% Office Building B $76,781 $133,120 $44,110 1.2 12% Church $15,500 $55,619 $7,021 3.1 18% 1 Middle School $44,751 $114,380 $23,782 2.0 28% University Science Building $42,466 $223,680 $14,832 4.9 16% Elementary $33,270 $117,098 $12,613 3.1 20% I Community Center $20,104 $52,870 $14,374 1.9 38% City Hall $10,873 $45,000 $10,785 3.2 20% Office Building A $70,840 $223,140 $63,909 2.3 7% jArt Center $109,942 $227,570 $73,755 1.7 21% Church $18,562 $80,574 $3,502 4.2 22% Large Office Building $126,465 $113,490 $28,366 0.7 27% Medical Center $36,855 $128,120 $34,960 2.5 12% Middle School $38,816 $97,150 $27,315 1.8 18% Headquarters Office Building $218,020 $462,160 $147,325 1.4 9% Large Office Building $49,105 $110,634 $26,885 1.7 21% Large Office Building $30,582 $71,980 $21,460 1.7 46% High School $79,757 $238,960 $60,092 2.2 26% Large Bank Building $105,544 $160,020 $45,723 1.1 17% Aircraft Building $95,190 $258,790 $34,958 2.4 17% 1Public Works $24,769 $55,410 $18,376 1.5 25% Hotel $117,087 $253,370 $74,610 1.5 23% UHL Company Place: [GOVTCNTR] xx Government Center Energy: All Utilities 1600 Start of Place Energy Profile I Implementation +j W in D 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 Place Energy Profile NORM - 03 End of Implementation Jan Feb filar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Od Ilc: Dec Month -+-2011 2012 X2013 X2014 X2015 9/18/2015 9:12:38AM Page 3 Use in MMBTU Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Totals 2011 1,436 1,223 1,189 799 645 687 844 773 701 754 999 1,562 11,611 2012 1,302 1,140 957 751 667 654 782 762 635 774 1,056 1,359 10,838 2013 1,351 1,111 1,232 1,018 698 628 727 753 672 715 913 1,235 11,053 2014 1,307 1,109 1,124 682 529 476 565 580 477 476 565 677 8,569 2015 679 591 526 626 462 473 544 0 0 0 0 0 3,900 Totals 6,074 5,174 5,027 3,877 3,002 2,917 3,461 2,868 2,485 2,719 3,533 4,834 45,971 -+-2011 2012 X2013 X2014 X2015 9/18/2015 9:12:38AM Page 3 City Council Agenda: 7/24/17 2L. Consideration of Modifving GMEF Loan Guidelines reducing equity contribution and adiustin2 minimum interest rate (JT) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The EDA took action at its regular July 12, 2017 meeting recommending a modification of the GMEF (Greater Monticello Enterprise Fund) Loan Guidelines to better meet prospective borrower's needs. The proposed changes relate to the required equity contribution. The recommended change is to reduce the minimum owner equity contribution from 10 percent to a range of 5 to 10 percent while also adjusting the minimum interest rate upward for borrowers who provide less than 10 percent owner equity. This flexibility will allow more borrowers to consider using the GMEF Loan Program. The interest rate differential for lower equity contributions will serve as risk - offset feature. Standard credit and financial underwriting focusing on acceptable cash flow analysis for the loan repayment will still apply. Reducing owner equity requirement as proposed will not appreciably add to risk that is already present. Al. STAFF IMPACT: There is minimal staff impact in considering modifying the GMEF Loan Guidelines. A2. BUDGET IMPACT: There is a no budgetary impact related to consideration of modifying the GMEF Loan Guidelines as proposed. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to modify the GMEF Loan Guidelines as presented. 2. Motion to table modification of the GMEF Loan Guidelines for further research. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council approve the modification of the GMEF Loan Guidelines as presented. The proposed modification is related to the equity contribution requirement which currently stands at 10 percent. The proposed language (Section 5 d. 2) adds flexibility in equity requirements by stating a range of 5 to 10 percent which will allow more borrowers to consider using the GMEF Loan Program. The interest rate adjustment (Section 5 d. 4), increasing the rate for borrowers providing less than 10 percent equity, will serve as risk reward offset as well. All loans will continue to be appropriately collateralized and properly underwritten. There is not a requirement to hold a public hearing to modify the GMEF Loan Guidelines. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. GMEF Loan Guidelines proposal (markups language added) B. EDA Staff report r ..a Monticello 1. PURPOSE GREATER MONTICELLO ENTERPRISE FUND GUIDELINES The purpose of the Greater Monticello Enterprise Fund (GMEF) is to encourage economic development by supplementing conventional financing sources available to existing and new businesses. This program is administered by the City of Monticello Economic Development Authority (EDA) and participating lending institution(s). GMEF Loans are made to businesses to help them meet a portion of their financing needs. The loans are meant to be a secondary source of financing, provide gaps in private financing, and assist in securing other grants. All loans must meet four or more of the criteria established in the Definition of Public Purpose section. 2. ORGANIZATION The Greater Monticello Enterprise Fund is administered by the EDA. It is the responsibility of the EDA to assure that loans meet the public purpose standard and comply with all other GMEF policies as defined in this document. 3. GMEF GUIDELINE MODIFICATION At a minimum, the EDA shall review the guidelines on an annual basis. Changes to the GMEF guidelines require approval by the City Council. 4. DEFINITION OF PUBLIC PURPOSE GMEF Loans must meet at least one (1) of the following public purposes (if the EDA finds that the public purpose described in b. is met, the EDA must find that the GMEF Loan meets at least one additional public purpose): a. To provide loans for credit -worthy businesses which create new jobs. 1. One job is equivalent to a total of 37.5 hours per week. 2. At least 90% of the jobs created must pay at least 160% of the federal minimum wage, exclusive of benefits, for individuals over the age of 20 during the term of assistance. Annual written reports are required until repayment of the assistance. Failure to meet the job and wage level goals requires partial or full repayment of the assistance with interest. b. To provide loans for credit -worthy businesses that would increase the community tax base. c. To provide loans to credit -worthy industrial or commercial businesses (new or existing) that would allow the ability to improve or expand their operation. Factors including but not limited to the following will be taken into account: 1. Type and size of the business 2. Product or service involved 3. Present availability of the product or service within the City of Monticello 4. Compatibility of the proposed business as it relates to the comprehensive plan and existing zoning policies, 5. Potential for adverse environmental effects of the business, if any. d. In the event job creation is not a viable option, credit -worthy businesses have the ability to demonstrate public purpose by means of job retention. 5. GREATER MONTICELLO ENTERPRISE FUND POLICIES a. Business Eligibility: 1. Industrial and commercial businesses. 2. Businesses currently located or to be located within the City of Monticello. 3. Credit -worthy existing businesses. 4. Start-up businesses with worthy business plan and/or pro forma in a form acceptable to the EDA (historically non credit -worthy businesses will be denied). b. Acceptable Private Financing Methods: 1. Companion Direct Loan: The GMEF is subordinate to the primary lender. 2. Participation Loan: The GMEF participates in a portion of the loan. 3. Guarantee Loans: The GMEF guarantees a portion of the bank loan. a. Interest rate cap is subject to EDA approval c. Use of Proceeds: 1. Real property acquisition, development, & rehabilitation improvement costs including but not limited to the following: a. Land Acquisition b. Engineer/Design Inspection Fees c. Building Permit Fees d. Architect Fees e. Building Materials f. Soil Borings g. Construction Labor h. Appraisal Fees I . Landscaping j. Legal Fees k. Grading 1. Environmental Study in. Curbing/Parking Lot 2 n. Recording Fees o. Title Insurance 2. Machinery and equipment: a. Personal property used as an integral part of the manufacturing or commercial business, with a useful life of at least three years. Acquisition costs would include freight and sales taxes paid. As a general rule, office equipment would not qualify. d. Terms and conditions: 1. Loan Size: Minimum of $25,000 and maximum not to exceed 50% of the remaining GMEF balance 2. Leveraging: Minimum 60% private/public Non-GMEF, Maximum 30% GMEF, Minimum 110% equity. 3. Loan Term: Personal property term not to exceed life of equipment (possibly up to 10 years). Real estate property maximum of 10 -year maturity amortized up to 30 years. Balloon payment at 10 years. 4. Interest Rate: Fixed rate not less than 2% below prime rate or 1 % below prime if equ contribution is less than IV pUrUCHL uIrtotal 71� - as published in the Wall Street Journal on date of EDA loan approval, with a minimum interest rate of 1.0% Wntrih„ti— is lace than 1 Q percent of total fin 5. Loan Fee: Minimum fee of $500 but not to exceed 1.5 % of the total loan. Fees are to be documented and no duplication of fees between the lending institution and the GMEF. Loan fee may be incorporated into project cost. EDA retains the right to reduce or waive loan fee or portion of loan fee. Fee to be paid by applicant to the EDA within 5 working days after City Council approval of GMEF loan. The fee is non-refundable. e. Pre-pavment Policv: No penalty for pre -payment f. Deferral of Pavments: 1. Extending a balloon payment will require a verification letter from two lending institutions stating the inability to refinance and is subject to approval by the EDA. 2. Monthly payments may be deferred for a determined period of time upon approval by the EDA. g. Late Pavment Policv: 1. Failure to pay principal or interest when due may result in the loan being immediately called. In addition to any other amounts due on any loan, and without waiving any right of the Economic Development Authority under any applicable documents, a late fee of $250 will be imposed on any borrower for any payment not received in full by the Authority within 30 calendar days of the date on which it is due. Furthermore, interest will continue to accrue on any amount due until the date on which it is paid to the Authority, and all such interest will be due and payable at the same time as the amount on which it has accrued. h. Assumabilitv of Loan: None i. Business Equitv Requirements: Subject to type of loan. The EDA will determine appropriate and applicable business equity requirements on a case by case analysis, utilizing normal lending guidelines. j. Collateral: 1. Liens on real property in project (mortgage deed). 2. Liens on real property in business (mortgage deed). 3. Liens on real property held personally (subject to EDA approval, homestead exempt). 4. Machinery and equipment liens (except equipment exempt from bankruptcy). 5. Personal and/or corporate guarantees (requires unlimited personal guarantees). k. Non -Performance: An approved GMEF loan shall be null and void if funds are not drawn upon or disbursed within 180 days from date of EDA approval. 1. Non -Performance Extension: 1. The 180 -day non-performance date can be extended up to an additional 120 days, upon approval by the EDA. 2. A written request must be received 30 days prior to expiration of the 180 -day non-performance date. m. Out of Pocket Fees: Responsibility of the GMEF applicant. n. Equal Opportunity: The Greater Monticello Enterprise Fund is operated as an equal opportunity program. All applicants shall have equal access to GMEF funds regardless of race, sex, age, marital status, or other personal characteristics o. Participating Lending Institution(s): 1. Participating lending institution(s) shall be determined by the GMEF applicant. 2. Participating lending institution(s) shall cooperate with the EDA and assist in carrying out the policies of the GMEF as approved by the City Council. 3. Participating lending institution(s) shall analyze the formal application and indicate to the EDA the level at which the lending institution will participate in the finance package. p. Loan Administration: 1. City Staff shall collect applicable GMEF payments. 2. City Staff shall assure City compliance with all applicable terms and conditions of the approved loan. 3. All loan documents shall include the following: a. Definition of loan default, agreements regarding notification of default b. Copy of primary lenders documents C. Provisions allowing the City to inquire on the status of the primary loan 6. LOAN APPLICATION PROCEDURES The EDA desires to make the GMEF loan application process as simple as possible. However, certain procedures must be followed prior to EDA consideration of a loan request. Information regarding the program and procedures for obtaining a loan are as follows: a. Citv Staff. City Staff shall carry out GMEF operating procedures as approved by the EDA and City Council. Staff is responsible for assisting businesses in the loan application process and will work closely with applicants in developing the necessary information. b. Application Process: 1. Applicant shall complete a preliminary loan application. Staff will review application for consistency with the policies set forth in the Greater Monticello Fund Guidelines. 2. If applicant gains initial support from lending institution and if the preliminary loan application is approved, applicant is then asked to complete a formal application. Formal application shall include a business plan which will include its management structure, market analysis, and financial statement. Like documentation necessary for obtaining the bank loan associated with the proposal is acceptable. Attached with each formal application is a written release of information executed by the loan applicant 3. If the preliminary loan application is not approved by staff, the applicant may request that the EDA consider approval of the preliminary application at the next regularly scheduled meeting of the EDA. 4. City staff shall analyze the formal application and financial statements contained therein to determine if the proposed business and finance plan is viable. City staff shall submit a written recommendation to the EDA. A decision regarding the 5 application shall be made by the EDA within 60 days of the submittal of a completed formal application. 5. The EDA shall have authority to approve or deny loans; however, within 21 days of EDA action, the City Council may reverse a decision by the EDA, if it is determined by the City Council that such loan was denied/approved in violation of GMEF guidelines. 6. Prior to issuance of an approved loan, the EDA Attorney shall review and/or prepare all contracts, legal documents, and inter -creditor agreements. After such review is complete, the City shall issue said loan. 7. REPORTING City Staff shall submit to the EDA and City Council a semiannual report detailing the balance of the Greater Monticello Enterprise Fund. 8. HISTORY Public Hearing and Adoption the 31St day of August, 1999 Public Hearing and Adoption of Amendments the 8th day of November 2000 Public Hearing and Adoption of Amendments the 24th day of April 2001 Public Hearing and Adoption of Amendments the 13th day of December 2005 Public Hearing and Adoption the 23rd day of March, 2009 Adoption the 22nd day of April, 2013 Adoption the 27th day of February 2017 Co EDA Agenda: 7/12/17 Consideration of Modifvinu GMEF Loan Guidelines (JT) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Staff is proposing to modify the GMEF Loan Guidelines to better meet prospective borrower's needs. The proposed changes relate to the required equity contribution which currently 10 percent of a total finance package. The GMEF Loan program is a gap funding tool. The purpose is to fill the 15 to 30 percent of funding that a bank cannot or will not fund. Several recent prospective borrowers have inquired as to the possibility of accessing GMEF loans with an equity contribution of less than 10 percent. As per discussion at the June 14, 2017 EDA meeting, staff is proposing to add more flexibility to the Guidelines by adjusting the equity requirement to a range of 5 to 10 percent. This flexibility will allow more borrowers to consider using the GMEF Loan Program. Interest rate differentials are also proposed for lower equity contributions as per comments from the EDA. Standard credit and financial underwriting focusing on acceptable cash flow analysis for the loan repayment will still apply. Al. STAFF IMPACT: There is minimal staff impact in considering modifying the GMEF Loan Guidelines. A2. BUDGET IMPACT: There is a no budgetary impact due to the EDA's consideration of modifying the GMEF Loan Guidelines as proposed. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to modify the GMEF Loan Guidelines as presented. 2. Motion to table modification of the GMEF Loan Guidelines for further research. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the EDA modify the GMEF Loan Guidelines as presented. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. GMEF Loan Guidelines proposal (markups language added) City Council Agenda: 7/24/2017 2M. Consideration of approving an additional performance bond fee of $3,825 to the original quote submitted by Recreation by Lemmie Jones LLC for aquatic plav structure. (AM/JO) REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: City Council is asked to consider approving the addition of the fee for a performance bond to the original aquatic play structure quote from Recreation by Lemmie Jones LLC (the Company). In essence this additional fee represents a change order to the original quote accepted by the City Council at the previous meeting The original accepted quote for the aquatic play structure is $99,765.00 and does not include the cost of a performance bond. The company is requesting a 50% deposit payment due upon execution of the proposal with 10% of the total payment held back prior to acceptance. This project is a custom made aquatic play structure and it is common request to provide a 25-50% upfront deposit for the construction materials. Due to the risk associated with these terms, we are requesting a performance bond. The quoted cost to add a performance bond to the project is $3,825.00. If this additional expense is approved the bid is still $11,491.50 less than the next lowest quote for the project. Please note that according to the City Attorney, a performance bond is not required by statute for projects under $100,000 however he recommends a performance bond unless a large share total payment is held up until completion. In this case, under the terms desired by the Company, only 10% of the total will be held back. This company has been operating successfully for a number of years and has provided a list of references for our review. Additionally, the project manager, Jay Webber is known by Tom Pawelk as being an effective and reliable project manager as Jay Webber has been involved with installation of numerous outside play structures over the years. Thus we have a high level of confidence that the project will get completed in a satisfactory manner. Al. Budget Impact: Amounts expended above the budget are financed through the fund balance (prior year accumulation of revenues in excess of expenditures). This project will be funded through the Community Center's fund balance, since the 2017 budget has been expended for building improvements. A2. Staff Workload Impact: Staff time will include overseeing the project and working with the contractor to finalize the project. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the addition of a fee to include a performance bond to the City Council Agenda: 7/24/2017 original quote from Recreation by Lemmie Jones LLC for a total of $3,825.00. 2. Motion to authorize moving forward with the project under the terms identified by the Company which include 50% down, 10% payment amount held until completion and no performance bond. 3. Motion to deny and requote the project for next year. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The City Administrator and MCC Director recommend alternative 1. Although this is a highly reputable firm and we have had good experience with the project manager, the payment terms, the Council should consider adding the performance bond. The quote amount is good relative to the competitors and who knows if the project will come in lower if bid out next year. In addition, a later installation would require diamond patching over diamond bright surface being installed this year. In the future we will be sure to identify payment schedule and performance bond expectations with the quoting process. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • Reference List 2 Partial list of Projects that Design2Play, LLC provided design, manufacturing support and install supervision for: • Great Wolf Lodge- The Dells: Large Indoor Interactive WetScape and Play Structure- Lake Delton, WI -USA 2005 • Legoland California: Large Outdoor WetScape Attraction- Carlsbad, CA- USA 2006 • Great Wolf Lodge- Grapevine: Large Indoor Interactive WetScape and Play Structure- Grapevine, TX -USA 2006 • NRH20 Water Park: Medium Outdoor WetScape Attraction- North Richland Hills, TX- USA 2007 • Dollywood's Splash Country: Outdoor Interactive WetScape Features- Pigeon Forge, TN- USA 2007 • Water World Water Park: Custom Themed Interactive Circus Animal Features- Federal Heights, CO- USA 2008 • Great Wolf Lodge- Grand Mound: Large Indoor Interactive WetScape and Play Structure- Grand Mound, WA -USA 2008 • Louisville Zoo- Custom Themed Outdoor Interactive WetScape- Louisville, KY- USA 2008 • JW Marriott San Antonio Hill Country: Custom Themed Large Outdoor Interactive Lazy River Features- San Antonio, TX -USA 2008 • Great Wolf Lodge- Concord: Large Indoor Interactive WetScape and Play Structure- Concord, NC -USA 2009 • Six Flags Great America: Large Outdoor Interactive Buccaneer Themed Attraction / Water Features- Gurnee, IL -USA 2009 • Valley of the Springs: Large indoor Themed Lazy River Water Features and Hotel Theming- French Lick, IN- USA 2009 • Magic Planet Kids: Large Indoor Interactive Aquativity Tables and Features- Mirdif City Center -Dubai, UAE 2010 • Legoland California Water Park: Themed Super Splash Tower and Aquativity Tables- Carlsbad, CA- USA 2010 • Six Flags Great America: Outdoor Interactive Lazy River Features- Agawam, MA- USA 2010 • Texas State Aquarium: Large Outdoor WetScape Attraction- Corpus Christi, TX -USA. 2011 • Legoland Florida Water Park: Outdoor Themed Aquativity Tables- Winter Haven, FL- USA 2011 • Moody Gardens: Large Outdoor Interactive Lazy River and Wave Pool Features- Galveston, TX -USA 2011 • Aquariaz Water Park: Medium Indoor Interactive WetScape and Play Structure- Avoriaz-FRANCE 2012 • Dallas Arboretum: Large Outdoor Water Based Educational Exhibits- Dallas, TX- USA 2013 • Legoland Malaysia Water Park: Outdoor Themed Aquativity Tables- Johor- MALAYSIA 2013 • Walvis Bay Water Park: Small Outdoor WetScape Attraction- Namibia, AFRICA 2013 • Great Wolf Lodge New England: Indoor Interactive WetScape Features- Worcester, MA -USA 2014 • Madame Tussands Wax Museum: Designed many Interactive Features in the wax museum- Orlando, FL 2014 • Lego Discovery Center: Medium Custom Water Table Exhibit- Chicago, IL USA 2015 • The Crayola Experience: Small Custom Interactive Kinetic Ball Machine Exhibit- Orlando, FL USA 2015 • Kalahari Resort: Large Indoor Custom Water Table Attraction- Poconos, PA USA 2015 • Lego Discovery Center: Medium Custom Water Table Exhibit- Atlanta, GA USA 2016 • Louisville Zoo- Recondition of original Outdoor Interactive WetScape- Louisville, KY- USA 2016 • Great Wolf Lodge Colorado Springs: Indoor Interactive WetScape Features- Colorado Springs, CO -USA 2016 • Great Wolf Lodge Traverse City: Indoor Interactive WetScape Features- Traverse City, MI -USA 2016 • Great Wolf Lodge LaGrange: Indoor Interactive WetScape Features- LaGrange, GA -USA (currently in production) • Great Wolf Lodge Traverse City: Indoor Interactive WetScape Features- Gernee, IL -USA (currently in production) • American Dream Mega Mall: Custom Lazy River Features- Meadowlands, NY- USA (currently in production) City Council Agenda — 07/24/2017 4A. Consideration to approve Ordinance No. 673 and Summary Ordinance No. 673A for Amendment to PUD, Final Stage Planned Unit Development and Final Plat for Chelsea Corner for Office, Service, and Warehouse Uses in the Red Rooster Planned Unit Development. Applicant: Red Rooster Properties (AS) Property: Legal: Lot 1, Block 2 (with exceptions), Oakwood Industrial Park; PID 155018002012 Address: 100 Chelsea Road Planning Case Number: 2017-016 A. REFERENCE & BACKGROUND: Request(s): Request to subdivide an existing parcel with multiple buildings to accommodate a new user on the western parcel, and development of a new principal use building and accessory use storage building on newly subdivided parcel for commercial/industrial purposes, through an amendment to an existing Planned Unit Development. Deadline for Decision: July 101h, 2017 Land Use Designation: Places to Shop Zoning Designation: PUD, Planned Unit Development The purpose of the PUD, Planned Unit Development District is to provide greater flexibility in the development of neighborhoods and non-residential areas in order to maximize public values and achieve more creative development outcomes while remaining economically viable and marketable. This is achieved by undertaking a process that results in a development outcome exceeding that which is typically achievable through the conventional zoning district. The City reserves the right to deny the PUD rezoning and direct the developer to re -apply under the standard applicable zoning district. Overlays/Environmental Regulations Applicable: NA Current Site Use: Commercial/Industrial buildings for storage and office Surrounding Land Uses: North: Commercial City Council Agenda — 07/24/2017 East: Industrial South: Industrial West: Vacant Commercial Project Description: The applicant is seeking approval of a subdivision to separate a portion of the existing development, with multiple buildings, to accommodate occupancy of a portion of the property by a new user, and development of new buildings for the applicant's commercial/ industrial uses. Both sites would contain a combination of office and storage uses for separate businesses. ANALYSIS Final Stage Planned Unit Development & Final Plat Red Rooster, LLC has submitted application for final plat and final stage PUD. The site and building plans are consistent in configuration, scope and use as proposed under the development stage PUD. Planning Commission reviewed the Development Stage PUD for amendment to PUD and Preliminary Plat in June, forwarding their recommendation for approval on to Council on the Development Stage PUD and preliminary plat on June 26th. Council may wish to reference the staff report of June 26th, 2017 for the specific analysis of the uses and site plans within the plat and PUD. The final plat is consistent with the proposed preliminary plat in terms of lot configuration and size for the two proposed parcels. Staff have reviewed the revised plans submitted for the final plat and PUD. Minor revisions to the civil plans are still required as a result of the review of revised plans. The City Engineer has submitted a secondary letter addressing the remaining items to be resolved. Final plat and PUD approval are contingent on the reconciliation of these items. In accordance with requirements of Zoning Ordinance 2.4(0) for Planned Unit Development, the applicant has also revised their PUD plans to address the conditions of the Exhibit Z approved with the Development Stage application. The lighting plan is being revised at this time and as such, the condition for compliance remains in the Exhibit Z. It should be noted that the applicant proposes to surface with a chip seal material (or acceptable alternative) to the rear of the proposed office building and accessory building with the construction of the accessory building. Further, the applicant has provided two alternative building front elevations for the Council to consider as Oil City Council Agenda — 07/24/2017 related to the proposed office building exterior facade. The applicant is seeking Council direction as related to these presented alternatives. The applicant has provided a cross easement and association declaration, which has been reviewed by the City Attorney. Staff has recommended revisions to the document in reference to the private utilities system and will require those comments be addressed as a condition of approval. Any approval is contingent on compliance with the remaining conditions of approval for the plan sets, those conditions which are on-going, and those as related to the final execution of the development contract and review for building permit. Amendment to PUD An ordinance amendment has been prepared for the amended Planned Unit Development District. The ordinance outlines the allowable principal uses within the PUD per the proposed amendment, incorporating the development plans by reference. Development Agreement An amendment to the development contract for the plat and planned unit development district has been prepared. As the area within the plat is fully developed, no additional trunk charges are payable; however, WAC and SAC charges are applicable for the proposed building expansion. Escrow deposits related to the inspection of utility connection work at Chelsea Road, as well as site grading and restoration inspection are required. Standard landscaping and lot monument securities are also required. The agreement is binding on all successors, heir and assigns, including those entities which may purchase or lease development parcels or buildings within the plat. Final comments from the developer have not been received as of the time of this report, and as such, minor revisions to the agreement may occur. Substantive changes will require review by Council. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS The applicant is seeking approval of a final stage PUD for amendment to PUD, final plat, and corresponding development contract and PUD agreement. Planning Commission previously recommended approval of the Development Stage PUD for amendment to PUD and preliminary plat. Decision 1: Final Stage PUD and Amendment to PUD Ordinance 3 City Council Agenda — 07/24/2017 1. Motion to adopt Ordinance No. 673 approving an amendment to PUD, based on the findings in Resolution 2017-45, and subject to the conditions attached to this staff report as Exhibit Z, with building facade design as directed by the City Council. 2. Motion to deny Ordinance No. 673 approving an amendment to PUD, based on the findings in Resolution 2017-45, and subject to the conditions attached to this staff report as Exhibit Z. 3. Motion to table action on the request, based on findings to be stated by the City Council. Decision 2: Final Plat and Development Contract 1. Motion to adopt Resolution No. 2017-46 approving a Final Plat and Development Contract for Chelsea Corner, based on the findings in said resolution, and the conditions attached to this staff report as Exhibit Z. 2. Motion to deny adoption of Resolution No. 2017-46 approving a Final Plat and Development Contract for Chelsea Corner Industrial Park, based on the findings to be made by the City Council. 3. Motion to table action on the request, based on findings to be stated by the City Council. Decision 3: Summary Ordinance Motion to adopt Ordinance No. 673A, a summary ordinance for publication approving a rezoning to PUD for the Red Rooster/Chelsea Corner PUD District. 2. Motion to deny Ordinance No. 673A, a summary ordinance for publication approving a rezoning to PUD for the Red Rooster/Chelsea Corner PUD District, based on the findings to be made by the City Council. 3. Motion to table action on the request. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Based on the revised plat and PUD plans submitted, staff recommends approval of the amendment to PUD for Final Stage Planned Unit Development and Final Plat for Chelsea Corners with the conditions in Exhibit Z. Further, staff recommends approval of the Development Contract as proposed and included for review with this report. D. SUPPORTING DATA L! A. B. C. D. E. F. G. H. I. J. K. L. M. N. O. P. Q. R. Z. City Council Agenda — 07/24/2017 Resolution 2017-45, PUD Amendment Resolution 2017-46, Final Plat Ordinance #673 Summary Ordinance #673A Amendment to Development Contract & Planned Unit Development Agreement Aerial Site Image Applicant Narrative/Letter Final Plat Preliminary Plat PUD Development Plans — Revised, including: a. Title and Index Sheet b. Site Plan — Overall c. Site Plan d. Grading and Erosion Control Plan e. Utility & Removal Plan f. Landscape Plan g. Details Sign Plan Lighting Plan Elevations, a. Alternative 1 b. Alternative 2 Phasing Plan Drainage Report City Engineer's Letter, dated July 19th, 2017 Response Comment Letter, dated June 23, 2017 City Engineer's Letter, dated May 31, 2017 Conditions of Approval 5 City Council Agenda — 07/24/2017 EXHIBIT Z Amendment to PUD, Final Stage PUD, Final Plat for Chelsea Corners Any expansion of self -storage activities in the PUD District beyond the limited accessory non-commercial self -storage identified in the PUD Site Plan and Narrative, as approved in the PUD Zoning District, shall be subject to an amendment to Planned Unit Development and may require additional improvements, including, but not limited to, paving, curbing, stormwater, and screening. 2. No outdoor storage of materials or equipment or materials shall be permitted in the PUD. 3. Lighting and lighting plans in the PUD shall be revised to be consistent with the requirements of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance. 4. The future building made a part of this PUD shall be consistent in materials, height, design, and color with the currently proposed building. Paving or alternative paving material shall be extended to the rear corner of the new office building and shall be further extended to the rear corner of the future storage building at the time of construction of said future building and shall be subject to the prior review and approval of the City Engineer. 6. Signage shall meet the requirements of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance. 7. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations of the City Engineer, per the letter dated July 19th, 2017. 8. The applicant enter into an amendment to PUD and Development Agreement for the site specifying for the allowable uses and conditions. 9. The applicant shall record cross -access and parking and utility association agreements for the two parcels. Such agreement shall be subject to the review of the City Attorney and shall include language for utilities as recommended by the City Engineer. G CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2017-45 APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO PUD FOR FINAL STAGE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR RED ROOSTER - CHELSEA CORNER PUD WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted an application for approval of a Final Stage PUD for amendment to an existing PUD, Planned Unit Development District; and WHEREAS, the applicant concurrently proposes to develop the property for business office and accessory storage and industrial service uses, in additio rincipal storage for organizations with no other presence on the property; and WHEREAS, the site is guided for commercial uses under the label "Places to Shop" in the City's Comprehensive Plan; and A WHEREAS, the proposed PUD, along wit)the companion PlaNareonsistent with the long- term use and development of the property for commercial uses; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on June 6, 201 on the Development Stage PUD and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the applicant has revised and submitted Final StageUD plans in accordance with the Develop � nt Stage P ,and WHEREAS, the City Council has onsidered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into thWlution; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: 1. The PUD provides an opriate means of furthering the intent of the mprehensive Plan for e site by putting the existing and proposed ines to limited use. 2. ThilWof the site for storage for non-profit organizations is consistent with the interest in promoting civic charity work and community pride. 3. The proposed improvements on the site under the Development Stage PUD are consistent with the needs of the PUD in this location as a transition between commercial and industrial areas. 4. The improvements will have expected impacts on public services, including sewer, water, stormwater treatment, and traffic which have been planned to serve the property for the development as proposed. 5. The PUD flexibility for the project, including modifying pavement requirements and storage uses, are consistent with the intent of the City's CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2017-45 economic development objectives, as well as with the intent of the PUD zoning regulations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, The Monticello City Council hereby approves the Final Stage PUD for amendment to the Red Rooster/Chelsea Corner PUD District, subject to theco ons listed in Exhibit Z as follows: 1. Any expansion of self -storage activities in the P strict beyond the limited accessory non-commercial self -storage iden in the PUD Site Plan and Narrative, as approved in the PUD ZoningDi shall be subject to an amendment to Planned Unit Development and may e additional improvements, including, but not limited to, pavi=curbing, water, and screening. 2. No outdoor storage of materials or equip nl materials shall be permitted in the PUD. 6 3. Lighting and lighting plans in the PUD shal be reo be consistent with the requirements of the Monticello Zom rdi ce. 11 4. The future building made a part of this PUD shall e consistent in materials, height, design, and color with the currently proposed building. 5. Paving or alternative paving material shall be extended to the rear corner of the new office building and shall be further extended to the rear corner pf the future storage building at the time of construction of said future building and shall be subject to the prior review and approval of the City Engineer. 6. SignageVte e requirements of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance. 7. The appmply with the recommendations of the City Enginee, perr dated July 19th, 2017. 8. The applicant enter into an amendment to PUD and Development Agreement for the site specifying for the allowable uses and conditions. 9. The applicant shall record cross -access and parking and utility association agreements for the two parcels. Such agreement shall be subject to the K CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2017-45 review of the City Attorney and shall include language for utilities as recommended by the City Engineer. ADOPTED this 24th day of July, 2017, by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. ATI Jeff MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL 3 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2017-46 APPROVING FINAL PLAT AND AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR RED ROOSTER — CHELSEA CORNER WHEREAS, the Monticello Planning Commission held a public hearing on June 6th, 2017, for the consideration of the preliminary plat of Chelsea Corner; and WHEREAS, after taking public comment, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the preliminary plat the Chelsea Corner to the City Council; and WHEREAS, the Monticello City Council reviewed the Commission and approved the preliminary WHEREAS, the Monticello City Council 2017; and WHEAREAS, the preliminary and final plat for uses for the proposed Chelsea Corner al plat of of the Planning 26th, 2017; and Corner on July 24th, Corner identifies the specific plans and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY C*CIL OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA, that the final plat of Chelsea Corner, with drainage and utility easements as required, is hereby approved contingent upon meeting all conditions of the subdivision ordinance; and the follo ing conditigns: 1%1. An ansion of self -storage activities in the PUD District beyond the limited accessory nn --commercial self -storage identified in the PUD Site Plan and Narrative, approved in the PUD Zoning District, shall be subject to an amendment to Planned Unit Development and may require additional improvements, including, but not limited to, paving, curbing, stormwater, and screening. f 2. No outdoor storage of materials or equipment or materials shall be permitted in the PU Fg 3. Lighting and li plans in the PUD shall be revised to be consistent with the requirements of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance. 4. The future building made a part of this PUD shall be consistent in materials, height, design, and color with the currently proposed building. 5. Paving or alternative paving material shall be extended to the rear corner of the new office building and shall be further extended to the rear corner of the future storage building at the time of construction of said future building and shall be subject to the prior review and approval of the City Engineer. 6. Signage shall meet the requirements of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance. 7. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations of the City Engineer, per the letter dated July 19th, 2017. 8. The applicant enter into an amendment to PUD and Development Agreement for the site specifying for the allowable uses and conditions. 9. The applicant shall record cross -access and parking and utility association agreements for the two parcels. Such agreement shall be subject to the review of the City Attorney and shall include language for utilities as recommended by the City Engineer. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MONTICELL0, MINNESOTA, that the document titled "Development Contract and Planned Unit Development and for Red Rooster — Chelsea Corner Planned Unit Development District," with assignment of the specific terms and conditions for public improvements and the specific terms and conditions for plat development, is hereby approved. ADOPTED BY the Monticello City Council this 24th day of July, 2017. CITY OF MONTICELLO Brian Stumpf, Mayor ATTEST: Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator ORDINANCE NO. 673 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 10 OF THE MONTICELLO CITY CODE, KNOWN AS THE ZONING ORDINANCE, AMENDING THE RED ROOSTER PUD AS A ZONING DISTRICT IN THE CITY OF MONTICELLO, LOT 1, BLOCK 2, OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK TO BE PLATTED AS CHELSEA CORNER THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MON ,J a LELL0 HEREBY ORDAINS: i Section 1. Section 2.4(P) — Planned Unit Developments Title 10 — Zoning Ordinance is hereby amended by adding the following: 4 (XX) Red Rooster/Chelsea Corner PUD District (b) Purpose. The purpose of the Red Rooster/Chelsea Corner PUD District is to provide for the development of certain real estate subject to the District for office-comrrrLnd industrial services land uses. (c) Permitted Uses. Permitted principal uses in the Red Rooster/Chelsea Corner PUD District shall be office -commercial uses as found in the B-2, Limited Business District and industrial services uses as found in the I-1, Light Industrial District of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance, subject to the approved Final Stage Development Plans dated May 23rd, 2016, the amendment to Planned Unit Development dated July 24th, 2017 and development agreement dated July 25th, 2016, as may be amended. The introduction of any other use from any district, including Conditional Uses in the B-4 District, shall be reviewed under the requirements of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 2, Section (0) — Planned Unit Developments for Development Stage PUD and Final Stage PUD. Section 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to make the changes required by this Ordinance as part of the Official Monticello City Code, Title 10, Zoning Ordinance, and to renumber the tables and chapters accordingly as necessary to provide the intended effect of this Ordinance. The City Clerk is further directed to make necessary corrections to any internal citations that result from said renumbering process, provided that such changes retain the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance as has been adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 673 Section 4. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage and publication. The ordinance in its entirety and map shall be posted on the City website after publication. Copies of the complete Ordinance and map are available online and at Monticello City Hall for examination upon request. ADOPTED BY the Monticello City Council this day of , 2017. Brian Stumpf, Mayor ATTEST: A Jeff O'Neill, Administrator AYES NAYS 2 1w SUMMARY ORDINANCE NO. 673A CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA A SUMMARY ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 10 OF THE MONTICELLO ZONING CODE, KNOWN AS THE ZONING ORDINANCE, AMENDING THE RED ROOSTER PUD AS A ZONING DISTRICT IN THE CITY OF MONTICELLO NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, on July 24, 2017, finance No. 673 was adopted by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. Due to he lengthy nature of Ordinance No. 673, the following Summary Ordinance No. 673A has been prepared for publication as authorized by state law. The ordinance adopted by the Council amends Title 10 The general purpose of the ordinance amendments is to amend district. Section 2.4(P) — Planned UDevelopments, Title 11 amended by the following:,, Red Rooster/Chelsea Corner PUD District ng Code. as a zoning is hereby Permitted uses in the following parcel shall be office-gommercial as found in the B-2, Limited Business District and industrial service found in I-1, Light Industrial District: A Parcel: Lot 1, Block 2, Oakwood Industrial Park to be platted as Chelsea Corner. A printed copy of the whole ordin - avv ble for inspection by any person during the City's regular office hours. The complete nce will be posted on the City's website following publication. Im APPROVED FOR PUBLICATAA by the City Council of Monticello, Minnesota, this 24th day of July, 2017 CITY OF MONTICELLO Brian Stumpf, Mayor ATTEST: Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator VOTING IN FAVOR: VOTING IN OPPOSITION: (reservedfor recording information) AMENDMENT TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT RED ROOSTER — CHELSEA CORNER PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT LOT 1, BLOCK 2, OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK THIS AMENDMENT TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT ("Amendment") is made this day of 2017, by and between the CITY OF MONTICELLO, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City") and RED ROOSTER PROPERTIES, INC., a Minnesota corporation ("Developer") RECITALS A. The City and Developer previously entered into a Planned Unit Development and Development Contract dated July 25, 2016 and filed of record on August 5th, 2016 with the Wright County Recorder/Registrar as Document Number A1321232 (the "Agreement") B. The Developer is the fee owner of the property located at 100 Chelsea Road within the City of Monticello, Wright County, Minnesota, legally described as: 193051v2 Lot 1, Block 2, OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK, according to the plat on file and of record in the office of the Register of Deeds, in and for Wright County, Minnesota, except the South 100 feet thereof. And also excepting: That part of Lot 1, Block 2, OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK, City of Monticello, that lies East of a line drawn 331.5 feet West of and parallel to the East line of said Lots as measured at right angles thereto, according to the plat on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, in and for the County of Wright, State of Minnesota. (the "Property"). C. The Developer has requested an amendment to the Agreement to subdivide Lot 1, Block 2, Oakwood Industrial Park as legally described into two lots, to be platted as Lot I and Lot 2, Block 1, Chelsea Corner. D. The Developer has requested an amendment to the Agreement to construct a multi - tenant commercial building and accessory use building on Lot 2, Block 1, Chelsea Corner. E. Pursuant to City Code, Chapter 2, Section 2.4, a PUD Amendment may be approved by a simple majority of the City Council after public hearing and recommendation of the Planning Commission. The Developer shall follow the procedures and requirements of the PUD Development and Final Stage. A PUD Amendment shall be memorialized with an Amendment to the Development Contract and Planned Unit Development Agreement, executed by the City and Developer, and recorded against the Property. F. The City Council reviewed and approved the preliminary plat of Chelsea Corner on June 26th, 2017. G. The City Council reviewed and approved the proposed PUD Amendment per Ordinance No. 673 on July 10th, 2017, subject to conditions in Exhibit Z of the staff report. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 193051v2 1. The City hereby approves the subdivision of the existing Property and the construction of a multi -tenant commercial building and accessory building consistent with the plans provided by the Developer and approved by the City on July 24th, 2017. 2. Developer agrees that any expansion of self -storage activities in the PUD District beyond the limited accessory non-commercial self -storage identified in the PUD Site Plan and Narrative, as approved in the PUD Zoning District, shall be subject to a further amendment to the Planned Unit Development and may require additional improvements, including, but not limited to, paving, curbing, stormwater, and screening. 3. No outdoor storage of materials or equipment shall be permitted in the PUD. 4. The future building made a part of this PUD shall be consistent in materials, height, design, and color with the currently proposed building. 6. Paving or alternative paving material shall be extended to the rear corner of the new office building and shall be further extended to the rear corner of the future storage building at the time of construction of said future building and shall be subject to the prior review and approval of the City Engineer. 7. Developer shall submit, for City approval, a site and full civil plan set showing the full set of existing, currently proposed, and future building and site improvements as a part of the record Final Stage PUD, including phasing of such buildings and improvements. 8. Lighting and lighting plans in the PUD shall be revised, and approved by the City, to be consistent with the requirements of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance. 9. Signage shall meet the requirements of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance. 19305M 10. Paving and circulation on the site shall be subject to the review, comment and approval of the City Engineer. 11. Developer shall comply with the recommendations of the City Engineer, per the letter dated 12. Developer shall enter into a PUD and Development Agreement for the site specifying for the allowable uses and conditions. The Development Agreement shall be accompanied by recordable cross -access and parking agreements for the two parcels. 13. Developer shall comply with the conditions recommended by other City staff or the Planning Commission. 14. The Developer shall furnish the City with a cash security, in the of $400.00 for installation of site landscaping in compliance with the approved Landscaping Plans. 15. The Developer shall pay a fee for the City's engineering administration as related to inspection and observation of the grading and restoration of the Subject Property. Developer will provide an $1,000.00 escrow, which is separate and in addition to any other escrow funds for grading and restoration for this Development. The Developer shall pay for inspection and observation performed by the City's consulting engineer. Construction observation will be billed on standard hourly rates per City's adopted fee schedule. 16. The Developer shall pay a fee for the City's engineering administration as related to inspection and observation of directional boring and installation of site utilities. Developer will provide an $5,000.00 escrow, which is separate and in addition to any other escrow funds for this Development. The Developer shall pay for inspection and observation performed by the City's consulting engineer. Construction observation will be billed on standard hourly rates per City's adopted fee schedule. 19305M 17. The Developer shall post a $600.00 security for the final placement of interior subdivision iron monuments at property corners. The security was calculated as follows: 2 units at $300.00 per unit. The security will be held by the City until the Developer's land surveyor certifies that all irons have been set following site grading and utility and street construction. 18. Except as otherwise specifically amended herein, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. This Amendment shall be binding on the parties, their heirs, successors and assigns and shall be recorded against the Property in the office of the Wright County Recorder/Registrar as promptly as possible after it has been executed by the parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Amendment to be executed this day of , 2017. [Remainder ofpage intentionally left blank. Signatures contained on the following pages.] 193051v2 CITY: CITY OF MONTICELLO (SEAL) :14 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF WRIGHT ) Brian Stumpf Mayor Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2017 by Brian Stumpf and by Jeff O'Neill, respectively the Mayor and City Administrator of the City of Monticello, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. Notary Public 193051v2 DEVELOPER: RED ROOSTER PROPERTIES, INC. Its STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss. COUNTY OF WRIGHT ) [print name] [title] The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2017, by , the of RED ROOSTER PROPERTIES, INC., a Minnesota corporation, on behalf of said corporation. Notary Public DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL, KNUTSON Professional Association Grand Oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (651) 452-5000 JJJ 19305lv2 MORTGAGE HOLDER CONSENT TO AMENDMENT TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT RED ROOSTER PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT , a , which holds a mortgage on all or part of the property more particularly described in the foregoing Amendment to Planned Unit Development and Development Contract, which mortgage is dated and recorded as Document No. with the office of the Wright County Recorder/Registrar, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, does join in, consents to, and is subject to the foregoing Amendment to Planned Unit Development and Development Contract; and agrees that the Amendment shall remain in full force and effect even if it forecloses on its mortgage. Dated: 92017. By Its And Its STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2017, by and , respectively the and of , a , on behalf of said Notary Public DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL, KNUTSON Professional Association Grand Oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (651) 452-5000 JJJ 193051v2 IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT No. Date: TO: City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street Monticello, Minnesota 55362 Dear Sir or Madam: We hereby issue, for the account of (Name of Developer) and in your favor, our Irrevocable Letter of Credit in the amount of $ , available to you by your draft drawn on sight on the undersigned bank. The draft must: a) Bear the clause, "Drawn under Letter of Credit No. dated , 2 , of (Name of Bank) it b) Be signed by the Mayor or City Administrator of the City of Monticello. c) Be presented for payment at (Address of Bank) , on or before 4:00 p.m. on November 30, 2007. This Letter of Credit shall automatically renew for successive one-year terms unless, at least forty-five (45) days prior to the next annual renewal date (which shall be November 30 of each year), the Bank delivers written notice to the Monticello City Administrator that it intends to modify the terms of, or cancel, this Letter of Credit. Written notice is effective if sent by certified mail, postage prepaid, and deposited in the U.S. Mail, at least forty-five (45) days prior to the next annual renewal date addressed as follows: Monticello City Administrator, Monticello City Hall, 505 Walnut Street, Monticello, MN 55362, and is actually received by the City Administrator at least thirty (30) days prior to the renewal date. This Letter of Credit sets forth in full our understanding which shall not in any way be modified, amended, amplified, or limited by reference to any document, instrument, or agreement, whether or not referred to herein. This Letter of Credit is not assignable. This is not a Notation Letter of Credit. More than one draw may be made under this Letter of Credit. This Letter of Credit shall be governed by the most recent revision of the Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits, International Chamber of Commerce Publication No. 600. We hereby agree that a draft drawn under and in compliance with this Letter of Credit shall be duly honored upon presentation. mm 193051v2 Its Red Rooster Properties, Inc. -Request for Amdt to PUD, Development Stage PUD, & Preliminary Plat Lot 1, Block 2 Oakwood Industrial Park 1155-018-002012 1 100 Chelsea Road Created by: City of Monticello April 8, 2017 Request: To split lot into two lots, add PUD amendment to accommodate split, to add building on new lot to east. Purpose: To accommodate sale of west portion of property and to make a more efficient use of property that was formerly used as a lumber yard as it is unlikely that a lumber yard will be needed in Monticello. Narrative: Last year Red Rooster applied and was granted a PUD for this property to allow excess space to be used for office, warehouse and self -storage uses. The permitted uses also included limited non-commercial self -storage as an accessory use. We realized that to best utilize this property it would make most sense to split property into two parcels and sell one parcel to someone with a similar business and with similar needs. We have a purchase agreement with Jovan Properties/DBA ProTech. They would be purchasing the main building and the building to the south of the main building.They are a restoration business with 6 to 8 office employees and 6 outside sales agents. They have similar needs as they need office space and warehouse space for equipment and supplies. They have outgrown their current location and would like to expand further in the future. This purchase would allow that. The construction side of their business takes place at customers locations as well as the material deliveries so their need for warehouse space is to accommodate equipment and leftover supplies. Their outside sales agents meet once a week at the office. The level of activity on site would be minimal. The split would accommodate Red Rooster as we could build a new building matching our needs and utilizing the excess space without leasing out as self storage which we do not want to do. Our needs are similar as we have to accommodate a lot of maintenance equipment but also restaurant equipment for replacement and repair, which takes up one of the existing buildings and then some. We are presently donating space to the Monticello Lions and the Monticello Chamber of Commerce which basically uses the second building. If we are to continue donating the space for the Lions and Chamber we would like the ability to also build on the existing slab in the future to accommodate our growth in the future. We are proposing this without improvements to the area around that building as it is not accessible to the public, gets minimal traffic, currently has hard packed gravel base, and has a buffer of asphalt existing before it leads to Chelsea so it doesn't leave mud or debris on the road. We propose to split property North to South at the entrance and have a shared access on the new property line to the South accommodating both parties that both parties would agree to maintain. We feel that the uses described would be a good transition and fit in the current zoning and could be accomplished with an PUD amendment and new plat. Th� nl�lfgu To H I aus Red Rooster Properties, Inc. May 5th 2017 Red Rooster Properties, Inc. understands the financial requirements for the development of the PUD of Chelsea Corner and the financial guarantees for the completion of such improvements. Tom Holthaus President May 15, 2017 RE: Application review Dear Mr. Thunander, Please find response to application review letter dated May 111h, 2017 Clarification of development schedule Plan to start construction as soon as possible after final plat recording. Completion in aprox. 90 to 120 days. Future building on existing slab to be built when necessary not known at this time. Clarification of the types of uses Aside from Red Rooster Properties there will be one tenant Wright Sherburne Realty taking space shown on floor plan already submitted. Exterior lighting Enclosed Specific flexibilities We believe that basically building the same type of building that exists we are complying with the zoning, adding stone, and architectural steel on front as shown on plan. Provide title information Enclosed SWPP Enclosed Trash handling Inside building workshop as shown on floor plan Site plan signatures and setbacks Enclosed Cross Access Agreement Enclosed Thanks, Tom CHELSEA CORNER KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That Simonson Lumber of Monticello, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation, fee owner, Quarry Community Church, a Minnesota Non—profit Corporation, contract purchaser; Red Rooster Properties, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation, contract purchaser; and Sentry Bank FKA First State Bank of St. Joseph, a Minnesota Corporation, mortgagee, of the following described property situated in the County of Wright, State of Minnesota, to—wit: Lot I, Block 2, OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK, according to the plat on file and of record in the Office of the Register of Deeds, in and for Wright County, Minnesota, except the South 100 feet thereof. And also excepting: That part of Lot 1, Block 2, OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK, City of Monticello, that lies East of a line drawn 331.5 feet West pf and parallel to the East line of said Lots as measured at right angles thereto, according to plat on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, in and for the County of Wright, State of Minnesota. Have caused the some to be surveyed and platted as CHELSEA CORNER and do hereby dedicate to the public for public use forever the easements as shown on this plat for drainage and utility purposes only. In witness whereof said Simonson Lumber of Monticello, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation, has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this day of . 20 Richard Hobbs, President STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of Minnesota Corporation, on behalf of the corporation. (Signature) (Printed Name) Notary Public, County, Minnesota My Commission Expires , 20 . by Richard Hobbs, President of Simonson Lumber of Monticello, Inc., a In witness whereof said Quarry Community Church, a Minnesota Non—profit Corporation, has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officers this day of . 20 Denny Lindquist, Elder Dan Miles, Elder—Chair STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of Non—profit Corporation, on behalf of the corporation. (Signature) (Printed Name) Notary Public, County, Minnesota My Commission Expires STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of Non—profit Corporation, on behalf of the corporation. (Signature) (Printed Name) Notary Public, County, Minnesota My Commission Expires 20 . by Denny Lindquist, Elder of Quarry Community Church, a Minnesota 20 , by Dan Miles, Elder—Chair of Quarry Community Church, a Minnesota In witness whereof said Red Rooster Properties, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation, has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this day of . 20 Tom Holthaus, President STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of Corporation, on behalf of the corporation. (Signature) (Printed Name) Notary Public, County, Minnesota My Commission Expires 20 . by Tom Holthaus, President of Red Rooster Properties, Inc., a Minnesota In witness whereof said Sentry Bank FKA First State Bank of St. Joseph, a Mlnnesoto Corporation, mortgagee, has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officers this day of . 20 Darren Heying, President Doug Danielson, Senior Vice President STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20 . by Darren Heying, President of Sentry Bank FKA First State Bank of St. Joseph, a Minnesota Corporation, on behalf of the corporation. (Signature) (Printed Name) Notary Public, County, Minnesota My Commission Expires STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of Bank of St. Joseph, a Minnesota Corporation, on behalf of the corporation. (Signature) (Printed Name) Notary Public, County, Minnesota My Commission Expires 20 , by Doug Danielson, Senior Vice President of Sentry Bank FKA First State CITY OF MONT/CELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MN I hereby certify that I have surveyed and platted the land, or directly supervised the surveying and platting of the land described on the plat as CHELSEA CORNER; that this plat is a correct representation of the boundary survey, that all mathematical data and labels are correctly designated on this plat; that all monuments depicted on this plat have been or will be correctly set within one year; as of the date of this certification, all wet lands and water boundaries and all public ways are shown and labeled as defined in Minnesota Statutues 505.01, Subd. J. Shannon Bollman, Land Surveyor Minnesota License No. 44360 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF The foregoing Surveyor's Certificate was acknowledged before me this day of 20 . by Shannon Bollman, Land Surveyor, Minnesota License No. 44360. (Signature) (Printed Name) Notary Public, County, Minnesota My Commission Expires_ City of Monticello Planning Commission Approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota at a meeting held on the day of 20 Chairperson Secretary City Council of Monticello We do hereby certify that on the day of 20. the City Council for Monticello, Minnesota approved this plat. Chairperson Attest County Surveyor I hereby certify that in accordance with the Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.021, Subd. I1, this plat has been reviewed and approved this day of . 20 Wright County Surveyor County Highway Engineer This plat recommended for approval this Wright County Engineer day of , 20 County Auditor Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 272.12, there are no delinquent taxes on the land hereinbefore described on this plat and transfer entered this day of , 20 Wright County Auditor By.• Deputy Coun ty Treasurer Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.021, Subd. 9. taxes payable in the year have been paid this day of 20 By Wrigh t Coun ty Treasurer Deputy on lands hereinbefore described County Recorder I hereby certify that this instrument was filed in the Office of the County Recorder for record on this of 20 at o'clock _M., and was duly recorded in Cabinet No. Document Number Wright County Recorder day Sleeve . as Sheet / of 2 Sheets B0 WART PEDERSON, & ASSOCIATES, INC. v� PARK DR. Site 0 0 DVNDAS RD. I I I I I I I I IN I I I I I NO SCALE Sec. 14, Twp. 121, Rng. 25, Wright County, MN VICINITY MAP LEGEND. • Denotes found iron monument O Denotes set iron monument CHELSEA CORNER % / \523 } N9( '000'00 "E 151.66 N90°00'00 "E 178.22 -f \P / south line of — Lot 1, Block 2 — N90"O0'00"E 332.27 — ------------ N90°00'00"E 33/.50 — CITY OF MONT/CELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MN Drainage and Utility Easements are shown thus: II 6 — II II II --12�---� L----+12_ NOT TO SCALE f Being 12 feet in width and adjoining right of way lines and plat boundary lines, also \P �� being 6 feet in width and adjoining lot \q3 062 lines, unless otherwise indicated, as shown / '-A'0 on the plat. of � 0 50 ff of o I l Inch = 50 Feet 0 0 z. Sheet 2 of 2 Sheets BOGART, PEDERSON, & ASSOCIATES, INC. 14 I - PID 155-0/8-00/0/2 City of Monticello .4 ' PID 155-018-00/020 — � City of Monticello — CH=2/.73 S81 °45'00 "W L=21.81 R=75.73 I „ , ,-, .. �- �. ,. r, A =16°30'00" \CID \ 'y N73°30'00 "E . N90°00'00 "E I 1 �? N90°00'00 "E 9� � � 25.78 l3/. 06 - - 14a87 \ N90 000'00 "E 331.50 — — 1/2tOpen _ I ----------I �1----- —T-------�- 3 I N I I I ('21 `— north line of I Lot 1, Block 2 l I I I —loft utility easement per d I OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK „ 50,11 2 331.50-------------------- I I I I I IN I 2 I —/00-- II I M I A II I tv 04 I Ln dry/ S88038'45"E 16.92.--, I I I er „ O41 P I os i J — _ �50ft transmission I I line easement per I I —1-50— Doc No 55663/ I I O I II 2 o --66---� I I I I O Block I One I o I z I I i I I I : 40 iJ A -4i i i OI I I I N I I o1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I north line of the I I I — South /00 feet of I I I I Lot 1, Block 2 — --- ---------J L ---1 ------------J 3 % / \523 } N9( '000'00 "E 151.66 N90°00'00 "E 178.22 -f \P / south line of — Lot 1, Block 2 — N90"O0'00"E 332.27 — ------------ N90°00'00"E 33/.50 — CITY OF MONT/CELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MN Drainage and Utility Easements are shown thus: II 6 — II II II --12�---� L----+12_ NOT TO SCALE f Being 12 feet in width and adjoining right of way lines and plat boundary lines, also \P �� being 6 feet in width and adjoining lot \q3 062 lines, unless otherwise indicated, as shown / '-A'0 on the plat. of � 0 50 ff of o I l Inch = 50 Feet 0 0 z. Sheet 2 of 2 Sheets BOGART, PEDERSON, & ASSOCIATES, INC. v� PARK DR. —T4 Site I -r1NDA5 RD. I I I I I I I I IN I I I I I NO SCALE Sec. 14, Twp. 121, Rng. 25, Wright County, MN VICINITY MAP I hereby certify that a boundary survey has been completed for the preliminary plat of CHELSEA CORNER, Wright County, Minnesota. Signed: Shannon Bollman Date: 6/20/17 Lic. No. 44360 EXISTING PROPERTY DESCRIPTION. (from Title Commitment No. 03063– I7) Lot 1, Block 2, OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK, according to the plat on file and of record in the Office of the Register of Deeds, in and for Wright County, Minnesota, except the South /00 feet thereof. And also excepting: That part of Lot 1, Block 2, OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK, City of Monticello, that lies East of a line drawn 331.5 feet West pf and parallel to the East line of said Lots as measured at right angles thereto, according to plot on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, in and for the County of Wright, State of Minnesota. PROPOSED PARCEL AREA: Lot 1, Block 1-1.79 acres (77,968 SF) Lot 2, Block 1-1.88 acres (81,970 SF) SURVEYORS NOTES. I) Parcel address: l00 Che/sea Road Monticello, MN 2) PID No /55-0/8-0020/2 3) Trees were located individually for the purposes of this survey. 4) The preliminary plat includes topography collected April 2017 5) Existing sanitary line and water line are shown approximately per as–builts provided by WSB (City Engineer). Said as–builts are very difficult to see and exact location said utility lines can only be verified by uncovering them. We have only shown services we are aware of and their locations. 6) Underground telephone (as marked and located for the current preliminary plat) exists outside the existing drainage & utility easement along the north and west side of subject property. LEGEND: • Denotes found iron monument — sBL Denotes building setback line Denotes bituminous surface I II II 12 * O Denotes set iron monument of way lines m Denotes electrical cabinet a ° a Denotes concrete surface lines, unless Denotes sanitary manhole on the plat. pQ Denotes waterva/veDenotes wood fence rQ, Denotes power pole —0-0 Denotes chainlink fence Denotes guy wire Denotes retaining wall ❑T Denotes telephone pedestal — — — UT — Denotes underground Telephone ® Denotes electric meter — — — OHE — Denotes overhead electric Denotes hydrant — — — UE — Denotes underground electric 7{X Denotes light pole — — — W — Denotes underground gas line ® Denotes well Denotes easement ® Denotes air conditioning Denotes right of way ® Denotes Bollard — — Denotes major contour D> --Q Denotes cu/vert — — Denotes minor contour Denotes Tree, Coniferous > Denotes sanitary sewer Denotes waterline >� Denotes Tree, Deciduous — Denotes existing adjoiners LS 8194 Denotes John Oliver, LS LS 15233 Denotes Dennis Taylor LS CHELSEA CORNER (PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT) PID /55-0/8-00/0/2 City of Monticello CITY OF MONT/CELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MN CURVE INFORMATION Cl Delta=16030'00" L=21.81 R=75.73 LINE INFORMATION L/ N73°30'00" 25.80 PID /55-0/8-00/020 City of Monticello 0 50 I Inch = 50 Feet I I i I I I A f-1 /1 A r1 DO 62 > 1> ./> j i/> i > gb3> > > � 90v0 �4"IjAJ `L � 19686'Dl. ut II — —/?B/L 6 "7— I I TL(a BL 1 _ C14W I — north line of Aj) Lot 1, Block 2 loft utility easement per I T; pr posed parking 1 �OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK $ I -� „ proposed drainage & utilitv easement I I I T 965 001 f----33/.50--------------------------- II I' IN I —100— — \ �.• l o-- - F I l0 I proposed) buildlr7g o I it /0 I I m fi a N I ° V I ►, r �� I � �� I D , y proposed drainage % o I I I \ I h & \ utility easement�o, g pole building / 0, S8eo38'45 I m .. ' • / 16.92 o\\d 1 / --I I I •} ' • .• L_ UT 51.6 f •.. L 2 - I —�J V proposed drainage to �� 50ft transmission utility easement �_ o line easement per 4134.5 �I —50— Doc No 55663/ I� , — 66— << I I I ' PID 155-0/8-0020/1 p IF I 96'8 I I a W K Properties LLC o0 Block N One of m I I I pole building P ( 2 I • I I I , I , arD I I z �1 �Ji 'cel,• -G-9 ' r 1( IFI I I Im I Ih II I pole building NSI oN o l I ZI DO i I r i I N pole building % C � - -► I I Lu IO 965 II J north line of the ob propoled drainage — 6� South feet of & util�ty easement 9 mI 963 0 /, Bl d I— lases I �6�les rL \523 PID /55-0/8-0020/3 o I I Chihos Equities LLC 0 0 O I south line of Lot 1, Block 2 — — — — — — — — — — — — 3�0 ,� N90 °00'00 "E 332.27 •T N90 °00'00 "E 33/. 50 \ 121 \P \g2 r SOILS CHART (Entire site is comprised of the single following soil type) Map symbol & soil name Hydrologic Water table group dep th (cm) 406, Dorset sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes B >200 BO WART PEDERSON, & ASSOCIATES, INC. For the purpose of this survey, the North line of Lot 1, Block 2, OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK, has a bearing of North 90 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds East based on the Wright County Coordinate System NAD83 (1986). O Denotes 1/2 inch x /4 inch iron monument set with a plastic plug stamped R.L.S. 44360. • Denotes iron monument found. Denotes cast iron monument. Drainage and Utility Easements are shown thus: II 6 II II II 12 NOT TO SCALE Being 12 feet in width and adjoining right of way lines and plat boundary lines, also being 6 feet in width and adjoining lot lines, unless otherwise indicated, as shown on the plat. REFERENCE BENCHMARK: MnDOT Geodetic Database Station 8605 J, Stamped 8605 J 1967 Elevation = 959.25 (NAVD 88) PROJECT BENCHMARK: Top of Hydrant 30 ft north of centerline of Chelsea Road and 420 ft east of centerline of Edmonson Avenue Elevation = 962.48 (NAVD 88) OWNER & DEVELOPER: Red Rooster Properties, Inc. Tom Holthaus 9495 Deegan Avenue NE Monticello MN 55362 SURVEYORS & ENGINEERS.• Bogart, Pederson & Associates, Inc. 13076 First Street Becker, MN 55308-9322 763-262-8822 ZONING: B-2 Limited Business District Red Rooster PUD MINIMUMS: 100 feet Width Denotes Building Setbacks: SBL SBL 30' from front 20' from rear 10' from interior side, 20' from street side DATE: 5/5/17 FIELD DATE: 4/10/17 BK/PG: – DRAWN BY: ssb CHECKED BY: ssb, jd DWG FILE: 17-0112.00 FILE NO: 17-0112.00 REVISIONS: 17/6/19 add notes, add information per as–built provided by city engineer I hereby certify that this survey, plan, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Signed: Shannon Bollman Date: Lic. No. 44360 BOGART, PEDERSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. LAND SURVEYING CIVIL ENGINEERING MAPPING 13076 FIRST STREET, BECKER, MN 55308-9322 TEL: 763-262-8822 FAX: 763-262-8844 PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR Red Rooster Properties, Inc. Tom Holthaus City of Monticello Wright County, MN PROJECT BENCHMARK.• Top of hydrant, 30 feet north of centerline of Chelsea Road and 420 feet east of centerline of Edmonson Avenue Elev. = 962.48 Feet (NA VD 88) CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE DIGGING: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL TWIN CITY AREA 651-454-0002 MINNESOTA TOLL FREE 1-800-252-1166 TITLE & INDEX SHEET SITE PLAN - OVERALL SITE PLAN OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK o CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA FOR RSD ROOSTER PROPERTIES, SITE IMPROVEMENTS WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN UTILITY & REMOVAL PLAN LANDSCAPE PLAN DETAILS PINE ST. A j�F ST 2 3 C! 5 I� ITC TE�a T, V Q � Y OQ ry IQ � �n U PARK DR. HIGN ��AY94 CHELSEA RD. fSite W m Q i U Z O � J Q J A Q Z LL A DUNDAS RD, WRIGHT COUNTY Section 14 Township 121, Range 25 VICINITY MAP NO SCALE W a 0 Ljo wry Z r- cn o cn O N "' Z in O 00 0000 W of N V) Y W W N L r nj� C5 p WLLI O O Z �'(2) o U I I� m O m m p Ld 0 J (D Z Z Y � LLJ U C� F-- U) Q w w Q W a� _ J 0 0 0 U LL- C m U O L- U 0 ° O ° U c N L o d L ° N +' O Ln �o—o.0 C Cc) o o C Z ° L •- �WC 000 O � .� �z ocf) (np ��� W N 0 '� U) 0 U .� C N Q-•�= J ° L 0-0 - ) 41 L N � L L T Z� N O N "' Z in LU 00 0000 W of n r7 N W n Z1 in LU r W H W V) Y W W m n V(Z3 Z i jN OC7 z� w, In Ldw V) ww jz �N nj� C5 p WLLI (nwz O Z �'(2) O z�JW � M .. W Q of JUS n� Z � 0 In V) Ld ry p WLLI Z Z � 0 O � U 0 Q w Z LLJ U J � LTJ m U :2O U 9 b W o r- n rn r� I > > C� I D UE — — uc — UE — — — UE — — — UE — — UE rg I o �I T SBL SBL SBL SBL I I S a S L SBL I I ts� I r I I I I i I �' II r i ► W W III\I� I I II •.:...... I o M �� I ► I IIIA rim- I m / `/ / •/ / / / •� ~ • d I I W I l a n I I I LT — La / 0 UE I N — E EXIS IN BUI DING o m / to \ .�I �I ICn Lu II N II II W UT I I I I 5/.6 r---J` I I I I I WI I� >>I I; ;I 0 a 1�c Zd III I I i II i 1 O I I WI Im .. d 34.5 1 I IN d� d •d I I I I I I I I / •/ / •/ / •/—GL W I I - > I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I m I I 2 Il; 1 I O I�\ I l o I II Ir' Block"' 1 One I I I I I I ; I II I I I I I I I m I I' I I of • Ip I I I - a •. �J �, 1 I I I I d' I I N I II II II I I rI IN01 I EXISTING BUILDIN 3I I I l LU I I II I I � I II W I I O IPI III � I I b L ---- W M: — n i 'I I II I I / v I I I II I 1 I II I I gas I— -as las --1----------------J I n n n n n - rw A / ©I I I I I I / rw A / / / •/ ./ O 00 0000 W of N i > A C14 II, I m 0 0 L c� de (n w �I O O m M U - J d o Lu Q Q W O � z z Y E <L J ww ,E \I m r O I i Q LTJ of _ J Cn 1= 2 O L / II- I I I I I I• I i I I � N J IW IN I I II II I 1 I C has gas -ias las lTb I L— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — I— — — C - n n n n `PROPOSED PARKING PROPOSED BUILDING `EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING 8 N90000'00"E 33/.50 30 0 30 SCALE IN FEET SCALE: III = 30' z O m U Cn Li 0 W Q ZN LO N O N Z" 6 O 00 0000 W of N I.V > _ C14 O ZZO m 0 0 L c� de (n w �I O O m M U - m o Lu Q Q W O � z z Y E <L J ww � i LJ i Q LTJ of _ J Cn 1= 2 O L / L 0 ° 0 -° M U�°c O c ° N m7o�° L. 0+' 0 0 O Ln ° O— °o °o•a�c Z °E2c:E z 6 p O 0 O ° p Q� o0.°aQi° Q• 0V) (n N uo) �� M v��0 U 0 U �N CO 0 °•`J o � LT ai °� O i1— — O E -0 + (n ZN LO N O N Z" i jN W 00 0000 W of n LO N W n Z" i jN W Mnp r W H W I.V Y W W _ m n VCD i jN OCD Z LJ 00 M �w I.V w w W jz �N ZZO z L c� de (n w �I O C) J[Z � .. W >Q of JUS —)� Z 0 Q W Of W C) LiJ ZZO L LL1 O O I (n U - Z CD Q Q W Z � U —j J ww � i O mU:2 Cn SHEET NO. 2 / > > ' ' > z — > > > ' O 10 0 10 U SCALE IN FEET w 0 DRAINAGE AND SCALE: 1'' = 10' UTILITY EASEMENT RIGHT OF WAY PROPOSED LIGHT PROPOSED PARKING SUMMARY W POLE Conventional Spaces 20 HandicaDDed Spaces 2 UE UE UE UE UE \ UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE •�.'�: UE UE UE Total Spaces Provided 22 > O s � Z TAPER CURB Cn o Cn o �T = = _ —U� _ --� k� — — UT — — — .— =�1% UT UT UT -- — Ui — • A N DT � U T T'EF��T — — �T — -- UT — — --- — UT — - _ 1 I I PROPOSED SITE DATA_ r o I Building 27,126 SF o 40 15 15 ' I Parking Areas l0, 000 SF co I I 1 c Concrete Areas 10,57/ SF m I i 51 i Greensnace Area 34.273 SF 00 Z o-j o Total Parcel Area 81,970 SF I � Y z a W�= 3 J O 0 0 0 U 0 LL_ N � SBL SBL SBL SBL SBL SBL I I �L�� SBL SBL SBL SBL :BL SBL BL SB 0 L N I I � o� I O 1 PROPERTY LINE aL a I1011 ► 1 10 EXISTING ZONING: B-2 (Limited Business District) o Q, z Minimum Lot Area: No Minimum o E 2 w .c 0D i I N , 9 Minimum Lot Width: l00 feet o 0 I I I _ (TYP) o R4.33 — — Denotes building setback lines: o Q o o Q I SETBACKS �� 9 o � o I I (2) PROPOSED PARKING I,.. B612 CURB, TYP. (B-2) Limited Business District a� f) N ISTALLS, TYP . �, Front Yard Setback: 30 feet a Cn ICD I I N 1r SideYard~ ISL f°i m , Rear Yard Setback: 20 feet v o N I I Cn R 1.17 ,� L U N �, I Q.� J O 1 ) _UE-0 in o WI I r 1 r OROPOSED / 1 Z V N N 1 SITE PLAN GENERAL NOTES O Z 100 BITUMINOUS 1 O I I A V E M E N T1. All dimensions are to top back of curb unless ro N HANDICAP SIGN TIP—OUT CURB 1 otherwise noted. �N (SEE DETAIL) (SEE DETAIL) 2. A// Z� N proposed curb to be MNDOT Design B-6/2 Q W except where noted. W w PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE I I I J. All parking lot striping to be marked with a Q w< olkyld-based paint and MnDOT 2564 specific with 0° In N I 2 coats and at least 4" wide. zz w� Jas WW °e ° b 1 4. All concrete ramps, sidewalks and van accessible �W �� NN handicapped parking stalls to conform to current a Djz C5 �N I -o4 ° Q _ N A �, A.D.A. requirements. wz o LJ a 5. Typical full size 90° parking stall is 9' X 20' 0 _� �r I , ° z>< PROPOSED DRAINAGE I I I 70' unless otherwise noted. o� Q ow a fn AND UTILITY EASEMENT m I 1 I DEPRESS CURB 1 MILD AND MATCH I1 PROPOSED a LEGEND: AT PEDESTRIAN CONCRETE a I I E BITUMINOUS � ° Denotes sanitary manhole PAVE DENT SECTION a CURB RAMP SIDEWALK y N ° (SEE DETAILS) ° Denotes telephone pedestal I _ a ° ° I Denotes culvert I I 6I I O d ° ° 1 Denotes Tree, Coniferous I I I Denotes Tree, Deciduous N J L °° I -r X X —I- r �' Q / / I X —__ X �� I o Denotes bituminous surface Z I I° 0 a I I I 1 a s W , Denotes concrete surface ��/ W LL IDenotes wood fence o w z Io Denotes chainlink fence Z LLI —� Denotes underground Telephone O T Denotes underground electric — W m N 1 - - - - - - Denotes easement _ Z II 1 I Denotes right of way Q Q � Denotes building setback c� w w J I 1 I ZCn U� Parking Stall Count J _J w z w Proposed Flared End Section = O Proposed light pole SHEET N0. Proposed storm sewer 3 0 Q > INSTALL 10'' FIBER LOG, TYP. j963 �962� IE=959.60 962 10—LF 15" RCP @ I.00i f � UE UE UE UE U UE ' UE UE I UE UE -- - UE UE UE UE / UE — 'WO — UE� - — INSTALL EROSION 962 CONTROL BLANKET — --u---= 962 ---------- UT----- 77T _�— UT — �~6U— UT ----- UT (- --- —_ —---------� — --. - .. I I — — — •9631_�J 962 963 I ✓� a(. - .963-- 0.9% 963__0.9% STORM CB RE=962.2( I I IE=959.70 I I —964 I �o i ��0 PROVIDE ROCK CO\ISTRIUCTION 11' ENTRAN�E (S -E DLTAILS) I I I I �� X63 ° d ° ° d 4J FFE=965.6 I I I I I \ I I INSTALL 10" FIBER LOG, TYP. 111111110 EOF=962.80 O N yv 964.26 �� ��\ X = X . 63.58 I I (M EI ) / I I I I I I ROOF SLOPE i ROOF SLOPE I I I d I I I I I I I I I J I I I a / I d / X Z 0 10 0 10 w U SCALE IN FEET 0 SCALE: I" = 10' Gradina & Erosion Control Notes LU I. Contractor shall confine construction operations to the construction Q limits shown. o 2. All work shall conform to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's Storm Water Permit requirements. Contractor shall obtain NPDES permit and comply with all LU oz Permit requirements. 3. Contractor shall inspect the entire site at least every 7 days and within 24 hours Z Q 0 Q of any measurable rainstorm. Damaged silt fence or other erosion control device \ U N or practices shall be repaired immediately. Inspection and maintenance of devices N C • shall continue until the site has undergone final stabilization and a Notice of 0 0 p Termination is submitted to the MPCA. Z W Z : m 4. All grading operations shall be conducted in a manner to minimize the m m o J p Z potential for site erosion. Z z Y E Z 0 Q U) Q w U w U Z o ( 5. The site soil erosion and sediment control facilities shall be installed and o 0 o U I LJ_ < maintained to conform with the standards specified by the (MPCA). C of 00 U O L 0 SHEET N0. 6. Silt fences shall be installed prior the disturbance of any areas and maintained 0 L. ° o until all tributary disturbed areas are restored. L- CE ° N 7. All soils tracked onto pavement or any other off—site areas shall be removed °`° ° — ° O `n daily. o'0) c Z WC: aE�� z 8. The Contractor shall be responsible for the removal of all erosion control v, -0c c o O measures, including silt fence and bales, upon establishment of permanent °.°a) z vegetation in said areas. v o - o -C a,�, -o ° a cno 9. All ditches and areas disturbed during construction shall be restored and vegetated r >� M as soon as possible. Any finished areas shall be seeded and mulched within 3 0 w cv 14 days after finished grading is completed accordance to Mn/Dot 2575. 0 W ° +' c �I -0 0 0 3 ° 10. All disturbed areas shall be revegetated with seed mix, mulched, fertilized (D _0 ° iv & disk anchored. tLT�m Cn O 11. Backyard drainage swales shall be graded at a minimum 1% slope. 12• Inlet protection devices shall be placed in all storm drainage structures until vegetation is established on slopes. Z 13. Grading limit area is 0.42 acre. V O ZI N m� co 0000 14. All spot elevations are to top of pavement elevation. (ME) indicates match oN existing pavement elevation. W Z O W W H J1- W j� Y W W M SEEDING SCHEDULE O C7Z zo' i jN fyoW 00 Seed mix 25-121: 61 Ib/ac. W >-w LU LU>Z �N Fertilizer 22-5-10: 350 Ib/ac. Q y 0 Mulch Type 1: 2 T/ac. DZ0 �LdZ Q QC) O a_ M W JUS � Q .. OJ n I--- LEGEND: Denotes major contour Denotes minor contour Proposed Rip Rap X 948.0 Proposed ground elevation Proposed Drainage Flow Proposed Silt Fence Proposed Fiber Log SO0 Proposed Major Con tour 800 Proposed Minor Contour Proposed Erosion Control Blanket Proposed Bituminous Surface Proposed Rock Construction Entrance I Proposed Concrete Surface 4 � Z Q Z Q U Q_ QL U) • U p W Z W Z : OU p Z J Q 0 Q W (D Z U Z ( Q I Z < T of 00 U :2 0 SHEET N0. 4 -q" 0 EX SAN MH A A RE=961.65 i r- -�-i ii ori i ii i i �_ -► / `-► L/ PE 940.15+/- EX 1011D SC BORE EXISTING �y WET 3AP EXISTING SERVICE SANjT/AR Y > > > A LE FOR 411 REMOVE 30ZF INSTALL LEXIBLE PE SANITARY I o I - 96`�� EXISTING URB SEWER I I �-\ PROPOSED —9W� MANHOLE IE=942.00 BOOT CONNECTOR �'l�?-�-� STa �^� (FIELD VERIFY) _ -REM OVE FENCE TYP. — II I UE ut UE - iu�� „`9 UE UE —�0�— \ — I I 962 DIREC I ZONAL BORE ter �— —— — — — — —u-- — Ju _ _ I� _ 962= _--------- ----— I 963 I I 96,3 I I 4XI 60 LF - 4 HDPE I I �I I - , SDR 26 LU I � I I ► � � I, = i l * * I 964 o I; I I * i i I s PROTECT FENCE, TYP. I ,Iri I I DIRE41ONAL BORE I I I II .1340 LF - 111 TYPE 111 0 1 a ' REMOVE PARKING STRIPES '1K11 COPPER I77� I\ II SAW CUT AND REMOVE 157 I I � DIRECTIONAL BORE SY EXISTING BITUMINOUS 60 LF - 411 HDPE I I f I SDR 26 @ 2.00% \ $0 �,9s I — il\ 1 s� REMOVE FENCE s / _ �. DIRECTIONAL BORE W � PR�1 EC FENCE I MECHANICAL TO MA E - - 11 6 I � � � � 36 LF 4 HDPE CONNECTION, TYP. SDR 26 @ 2.00% o d ° LU 1 o d ° -}- I - ® i d °i ° dI 411 CLEAN OUTS, TYP. I o=1 I 1 °° I • J II I 1 � i J1 10' 1 i I I — I— — dm / // do dd I E III o ° o W ° ° ° o ° d 4 4 ° °o ° °o ° ° o ° °0 o ° o ° o• ° d ° d °d °o °o° ° ° ° ° ° o° o d e° ° r7 ° o o d ° o I I I ° a d • ° ° ° ° ° d I I I I I I I I °°° °° d ° ° ° o ° d A ° ° ° ° ° d o � ° o I F- I I I I ° I I ° ° d ° ° o ° d Al 0 ° O A w I I o I I d ° ° o o d ° o ° II ° ° o ° d ° o ° UT UT / e � � ° o ° o d ° ° ° ° $ d \ I I I I I 1 I 4 o o ° o ° ° ° d° °• d° ° d °° Io I I •d ° ° ° o °d ° o I I r ----J I I I o o ° I I I I °° • ° ° $ ° ° ° d °° • • o O d • I I� \o I � I 1 I I1 I o I I I � I � to , I I I I I I I d° ° o °° 34.5 t o o d ° a ° ° I °/ "°/ iid / i / i ° — — — :\7r� tc�/ I I I �0 I I I 1 = II I l,0 � I =W, lock ne I P °°o d I I I I I FA I ° °or I I I X 20 0 20 SCALE IN FEET SCALE: I11 = 20' UTILITY PLAN GENERAL NOTES I. Underground utilities shown hereon are as per available utility maps and measurements to visible On-site locate markings. 2. The contractor is specifically cautioned that the location and/or elevation of existing utilities as shown on these plans are based on records of the various utility companies and limited measurements taken in the field. J. The contractor must call the appropriate utility company at least 48 hours before any excavation to request exact field location of utilities. It shall be the responsibility of the contractor to relocate all existing utilities which conflict with the proposed improvements shown on the plans. The location of utilities shall be obtained by the contractor by calling Gopher State One Call at I-800-252-1166 or 811. 4. Prior to construction, the contractor shall obtain the necessary federal, state and local permits for the proposed work or verify with the owner or engineer that permits have been obtained. Permit fees shall be the responsibility of the contractor unless otherwise arranged with the owner. 5. All electric, telephone and gas extensions and other service lines shall be re-routed and constructed in accordance with the specifications of the appropriate utility company. The contractor shall coordinate the service line construction with the utility companies. 6. All sanitary sewer, storm sewer and water main installations shall be in accordance with the city's requirements and the current building and plumbing code requirements. 7. All sanitary sewer, storm sewer and water main construction shall conform to the City Engineers Association of Minnesota Standard Specifications, 20IJ Edition. 8. Coordinate installation of new utilities with the Mechanical plan. 9. A minimum vertical clearance of l8 inches is required at all wa term cin and sewer main crossings. l0. Manholes in paved areas shall be sumped 0.04 feet and catch basins in gutters sumped 0.10 feet. Rim elevations shown on these plans reflect sumped elevations. Il. All disturbed roadway areas shall be restored to some thickness and quantity. 12. Tracer wire shall be installed along all proposed watermain and sanitary services. 13. Provide minimum 8 feet of cover on all watermains. Insulate any watermains that have less than 8 feet of cover. 14. Traffic control shall conform to the requirements of the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MMUTCD). 15. Contractor to obtain a utility excavation permit from the Public Works Department at least 48 hours prior to commencement of excavation for utility connections. LEGEND: co EE Denotes electrical cabinet ® Denotes electric service C Denotes light pole Q Denotes hydrant Denotes sanitary manhole N Denotes waterva/ve --07- Denotes sign Denotes power pole r - Denotes telephone pedestal ® Denotes electric meter ` Denotes Flared End Section po-�� Denotes culvert O Denotes Tree, Coniferous (o Proposed Sanitary Cleanout z O a - U w 0 Lv Q 0 I\ co 0 co O C'4Z "' - r W Y w� M ij" O 00 0000 I,J � of N Q CO)ww Denotes jz 410 a Co Q C7 D r - m m concrete surface w M 0 w .. O Z Z Y E ��- Denotes c� Q W Z 0 LJ chainlink fence Q W [if _ 3 J O O O U O L_ CF - — U - Denotes underground Telephone (n U O oW v — — Denotes M ° ° c Q O c ° °oma° - Denotes N a ° +' a)0 w U O LO O — C: Denotes underground electric p SEC) cc >- Z Ld - easement _j w ~ z — z Denotes a cc O _ 0 O ° �Q) QIP Denotes aQi° m < L_ U) 0 W a- a) Denotes sanitary sewer 3 N v � 0 t. U N storm sewer � 1 Denotes waterline L 0-0 / T N � +� o t T— _ `O Eve cn o Z" LO N zN W O C'4Z "' - r W Y w� M ij" O 00 0000 I,J � of N WZ LO N zN W W a H a - r W Y w� M �v Denotes Tree, Deciduous Z 2 ij" O Z� I,J � Ljw Q CO)ww Denotes jz HN a Co Q C7 U)wz m 5Oz>a- � .. _jQ o U� nI— W Denotes Tree, Deciduous 1 Q Denotes bituminous surface 0 _j Q 0-U)0 Denotes concrete surface w W ��- Denotes wood fence Z o Denotes chainlink fence w ():f x Denotes barbwire fence - — U - Denotes underground Telephone (n U O z — — Denotes overhead electric Q Q w - Denotes underground fiber optics z w U — — — — Denotes underground electric — (n >- - - - Denotes easement _j w ~ z — Denotes right of way _ = O Denotes major contour m U Denotes minor contour Denotes sanitary sewer SHEET NO. Denotes storm sewer 5 1 Denotes waterline / E:3 / > > > > ' > > >NOTE: CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR z > / ALL UNDERGROUND LOCATE REQUIREMENTS. O _ ry — — — CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE DIGGING: w � -PROPOSED MAPLE GOPHER STATE ONE CALL � TWIN CITY AREA 651-454-0002 OR 811 . j 963 962� TREE, TYP. MINNESOTA TOLL FREE 1-800-252-1166 OR 811 1-962 — — — � w Q UE UE UE I i� Z UE U UE UE UE UE UE - UE UE Z --— UE — '� UE UE ��tlE►� UE -96/- j O . 962 / 1 MONUMENT SIGN u1 ur ��--96--------- — — I- (n 0 (n O Q rt7T-UT UT-— — UT UT -- UT �- O 10 0 10n963 - ci i -0 O I I I SCALE IN FEET m J SCALE: 1'' = 10' z y o I I �� Q w U w I I Q W�_ J o 0 o U o� I I L PROPOSED TREE SCHEDULES ° aLaL_0 O c, E= c z I ate, _� !�o° oo MAPLE (2" DIA.) a QTY. 2 ° 0 °' �•- oc/) (n 0 I I , ICO wN I I .. C L U N U N J ° N I I I �L�a� HARDCOVER CALCULATIONS: DESCRIPTION EX. AREA PRO. AREA PERCENT Z ti N I Z PERVIOUS AREA 10,560 SF 10,950 SF 13.4% 0 100 IMPERVIOUS AREA 71.410 SF 71.020 SF 86.6% ori GROSS SITE AREA 81,970 SF 81,970 SF 100.0% LO(0 I W LO 04 LV W wX °° I I I LANDSCAPING NOTES O z_z w( ° n ° ° ° 4,q ° ° ° ° ° c ° I. Areas not paved and to be landscaped shall receive minimum of (� jz NLli 04 ° ° a ° ° ° a ° G ° ° ° ° ° ° ° e ° 4" depth as measured in place of topsoil. All graded slopes greater than or equal Q y o'er NN ° ° ° to 4: 1 shall be covered by erosion control blanket after topsoil has been placed. �wz �(0 d A I LJ ° 0 p a_ G ° m _'a onw JUS -� I , I � I I I I � I I I I I �— LI I I ,I d° as 4 I I ] C ° da ° X --�X / I I W Of z I I I I Z J LLJ 0:� Q_ O p LLJ U 1 I i I 0 Q W Q W (� U J I o _j �woz mU� J / J I / I SHEET N0. I 6 0 Q PAVEMENT MAXIMUM RED COLOR SLOPE 2% IN ALL DIRECTIONS. CONCRETE WITH TRUNCATED DOMES PER ADA SPECIFICATIONS , _ „ — „ SIGN POST WITH s -0 5 0 6 o J ACCESSIBILITY SYMBOL (TYP) d< a d e c ,SLOEE UP eSLOk UP a 1: 12s 1:12 a • e ° a ° ° a e c e • �� �• a ° a° e ••P• •�22 e e FACE OF WALK a ::: ::: ::.::.:a ° a ✓ ° OR CURB 4" WIDE YELLOW IPES PAINT STIR (TYP.) 96" min. FOR VAN ACCESS ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES SHALL BE IDENTIFIED BY A SIGN SHOWING THE INTERNATIONAL SYMBOL OF ACCESSIBILITY COMPLYING WITH ANSI 4.28.8. SIGNS SHALL NOT BE OBSCURED BY A VEHICLE PARKED IN THE SPACE. SEE DETAIL Ck 96" min. _ INTERNATIONAL SYMBOL OF ACCESSIBILITY; YELLOW -4" PAINTED STRIPING 1'-6" O.C. AT 450 (YELLOW REFLECTIVE) ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE AND HANDICAP RAMP ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES SHALL BE IDENTIFIED BY A SIGN SHOWING THE INTERNATIONAL SYMBOL OF ACCESSIBILITY COMPLYING WITH ANSI 4.28.8. SIGNS SHALL NOT BE OBSCURED BY A VEHICLE PARKED IN THE SPACE. 3011 6011 411 ANSI 4.28.5 FINISH AND CONTRAST s POSTS TO BE THE CHARACTERS, SYMBOLS AND BACKGROUND PRE -PAINTED GALVANIZED STEEL OF SIGN SHALL BE EGGSHELL, MATTE, OR OTHER NON -GLARE FINISH. CHARACTERS AND SYMBOLS w SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND, WITH EITHER LIGHT CHARACTERS ON A DARK BACKGROUND Of OR DARK CHARACTERS ON A LIGHT BACKGROUND. 12 a � 1 Proposed signs to be placed in accordance BLUE- — =_ with the Minnesota Manual on Uniform 0 Traffic Control Devices (MMUTCD). 10 WHITE— Ljj REFLECTIVE FACE MATERIAL ACCESHU O PMMG 80 Go. Alum. O • HANNEL POST - (2# Ft.) 5'-5' LONG, to C� _, Ic a W 6 MIN iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii• Z SURFACE 4' 4" SLOPED INCRETE `lo 0 o i 'I > o io a' `�o� o o°0o �g i ,Q'4 o ob� a 0s 16" ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN DETAIL s PAVE WEAR COURSE s 1' WIDE MILL 1 " DEEPj JII\P11V111 LIIVL J/"�YYVVI EX. BIT. FOR REMOVAL PROPOSED WEAR COURSE, - BASE COURSE & AGGREGATE BASE REMOVE C FROM CUR CONCRETE 36 1/2" 35 1/4" CURB BOX ADJUSTABLE 6" TO 9" - 1 7/8" 5" 6 11 17 3/4" i w 15 1/2" 2411 -IN 11111- 31'1 s 36113111- 4,311 CASTINGS SHALL BE NEENAH R -3067—L OR EQUAL STANDARD INLET CASTING 1 n A s e A p I 1 - 1 1/2" BITUMINOUS MAT (Mn/DOT 2360 - SPWEA240B) TACK COAT (Mn/DOT 2357) -211 BITUMINOUS MAT (Mn/DOT 2360 - SPNWB230B) 6" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE (Mn/DOT 3138) COMPACTED SUBGRADE (Mn/DOT 2105, 2111) TYPICAL BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SECTION VARIES BROOM FINISH `SLOPE VARIES a a° e a ° 4" CONCRETE COMPACTED SUBGRADE 95 % MODIFIED PROCTOR TYPICAL SIDEWALK SECTION TYPICAL MATERIAL SECTIONS a NOTE: CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF M ON TI CELLO STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAILS TOP OF CURB CONCRETE GUTTER CURB AND GUTTER TAPER DETAIL OUTFALL GUTTER I 6" I �I/2"R TOP BIT. MAT �� 311R 3 i \—,3 R r 3/4" PER FT. — --r—---- -- 04I 1/211R BASE I I I 1211 — I _ 811 I — — — — — — — I ---� STANDARD GUTTER 6— II j I /—I/2"R T — - TOP BIT. MAT I F- a 3/8"311R 31 ° \-3"R I I — — J= 3/4" PER FT. fl I I I � II �I 1/2 R BASE I I I I I I 1211 I 811 I B-612 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER 12" THICK— RUNOFF WATER 1811 MINIMUM WITH SEDIMENT 0— -_ —__� 4mm III, 1 I1 1 IIII I —III_ SEDIMENT FILTERED WATE PIPE SIZE d o < 30" 3" i jN O Z [IfW 3011 6011 411 >-LLJ > 6011 6" UJli W LLI >z w a(A HN Of a � a �� 0 � Ljj Lj Lj O Z O I/8 COVER OVER PIPEr O (n 0 (n C� Q W 6 MIN iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii• Z lij O NU) N J w Z i/O _ = O W -CAREFULLY COMPACTED iii .TiiGRANULAR :2 o SELECTED iBc iii. MATERIAL. iiii, KD m 00m o J0�0 0 0 C �/6 Bc i�U)00000 0 0°0°0°0 cn Q w U w n d n n If — 0.5 B ---I c I I U L� If -0.5 Bc�l c o �•' L N o� °� O THE BOTTOM OF THE TRENCH SHALL ~- N BE SHAPED TO FIT THE PIPE BARREL FINE GRANULAR FILL MATERIAL FOR AT LEAST 50% OF THE L ° a� ° 0 O O CAREFULLY COMPACTED OUTSIDE PIPE DIAMETER. .a ° - c o THE MAXIMUM SIZE PARTICLE ALLOWED IS 3/8". o f= w E Z °- >, *- z 6) o'_ O Q) OVER EXCAVATED TRENCH CONDITION STD TRENCH CONDITION =-a 0 0 o v� Q) a) < oQ2o � �z � ��oCf) L > L (/)O REFERENCE: NOTE: FOR ROCK OR OTHER INCOMPRESSIBLE MATERIALS, THE Q) 3 U) � C V CONCRETE PIPE DESIGN MANUAL TRENCH SHOULD BE OVEREXCAVATED A MINIMUM OF 6 c o PREPARED BY AMERICAN CONCRETE PIPE INSTITUTE AND REFILLED WITH GRANULAR MATERIAL. o as (D 3 � N Q_•- J L N +, L CLASS C PIPE BEDDING ZN N O "' Z W COW of r) N n W ZI in W r W W a a j� Y W M LED 90° SHOEBOX NOTE: CHECK WITH OWNER FOR SUPPLIER OF LIGHTS AND MATERIALS CLEAR ROCK (3/4" TO 1 1/2") 4" PVC OVERFLOW PIPE WITH 1/211 PERFORATIONS • �i��i��i��ii 0i��i��i��i��ii��� WIRE MESH (1/2" BY 1/2") CATCH BASIN SEDIMENTATION BARRIER POLE HEIGHT LIGHT POLE FOUNDATION ABOVE ° a ° a GRADE a a BASE HT. a BELOW a ° GRADE a / w ° as LIGHT POLE DETAIL n o C7Z i jN O Z [IfW 00 >-LLJ UJli W LLI >z a(A HN Of a � cowz �� O QJE (or .. W >Q of JUS � Z Ld Of C) w z Z � Ljj 0 O U C� Q W Z lij U N J w Z a _ = O W m U :2 o I COm m E m N M Mm0rn N t0007NON Q f[ 7 mo } c0 N ? N 7p N M M c0 yO L CL EM pM7 O 7 0Y ��� U U ° a °- Vj 01�N aizU II w z O N I 1a MU IS �= z M Mm0rn N t0007NON p f[ 0 t0 W } c0 N ? N 7p N M M c0 x ^ to W 6 6 N 00 W N d pM7 I- ? � ��� w a = ~ 00 MM Vj 01�N II O W w z O N I O g o W M 0 W` Hm V) (n Uo =n p e�r� }mNOt°m7tONmt07m00 Q) 1 M 0,03 S O ZW Ill Tm c3c iiof N p Lq 7 OtON7pmNnOM t° n n W ZIn o U EW �= aro U ~ J a UO_ W o OOO�MtD LIJ vi° II ii LD O�IiU m LLL C x m a > o} L >< NW to -0 C wow O Ii >N 1n W t0 N° 1°! II 0 7 d• tO OR t0 O— C aJJF,=Q — arn W g wW x �p N ii g mLa rw,nato01MwN77nt°77oto W rNNNM7 W U W II ~ O~ ao o•� J W W m Q�Q t0 OO W MONNNMMaN O O --p +' L.L M O U =a o O rLi�T UNM7,n (nr ZZ Zp 00n a� 0 M OJ F W m W xm I I II IM n c6 W W O� U Cno LL M oac�5� O- aQ O Q w= >16 �7ooMrn7�ulm7rn,n,nmo00 H W �a Z II'\ 0) Z 00 0000 A n W JOS O LL a SOV N,M<,t Z" W m Oi.-,7,(iNN in W 1Ld vl g W O jna0Fr000l W �In 00M Of lON00010 W 0 w W SV r H Cj Lj p 3 l Q 1 0- W II U vy� Lj WDoe UO H� op r�[n o7dza aFpn O zm �QJ pQ HW �d zW w4a zm o x ii ; d WM 0NNM7NtOm�M)tG LLJ ,•i,66nNriaa O!lM U W x2 OS m WZ o+ II v 1n 2-t2 Z. Z. aaW W� �� a. Mm H ZN00 W Ka iiW a�a Fn p a5 Q N N notcNpppp70.N7lo N M M 7 71n U_Z JO n 00 0! wQ W} O= U) 5R W 0 WQ <W >,- WW Uap WW ~ vo Z Z O m O F aa2 J O WW 4 W WZ W= U W= �� m t y C ENa3 O_ H z ov) ` ui W S U ¢j zw mJ ww Q a3 �Mo W n °.y' U MM �c a zZQF S F W W M W U x aZ 3 ocmrn 0 N 0n FV10 41Wd Fm zm �sW LLI�J3J0 WQIi a �> Wt~i! mY W~ OJ N ° ii I B� C� Z oF�� 0. xaU W~W �W Kr M V) p 1' OW OQ w Wo o a p� s a W2 ZO E 00 ° p m II o° UU O w- O_Nam -a WOW mow N J d NO ° OwI1y� U*16rk< ® aQ W WK ow �� W W (9 Z� go jL J W M: 0 Wm< 7'L W W pm J - 7X xW K/ Q U. m ga i.. mZ J� o= _� LY �o I z Q�7a OUi w� ='^ .. O Qp WQ Wm II W ��W d'(G OQm d Q I Q W =W VO W O 'l' a3 iWM c0W a I W WK W z mp M a W U O O Q W C ii v • W D O K K Ll�< W 7 O S W W Z> c o I m J O W O U m a H W H F O W 0 8 W ii ( D_ .� WLM Z9 Z I j02 ap N0 II •' , WOa� Z wR lia N= a NO o zW II N F_ II O0. W '. vq�a j a ion WW M N n a I Z w r:. WZUp zw ao°vS owa oZZ WZEEcn 3 ii Ow.�Ji z0l` �W� O F �.• 7WJm WI -N p II V II N ZWO x aoE z_ Z�'i! o, Wi O U xO O U v�,37o moo' 9w w a = A CALL TO GOPHER STATE ONE (454-0002) W x W m IS REQUIRED A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS PRIOR TO PERFORMING ANY EXCAVATION. L Title` Residential Building Standard Plate Library Erosion Control City of Monticello Date: 03_05 Plate No. Revised: 6006 03-15 j SPECIAL NOTE: SPECIAL ATTENTION SHALL BE PAID WHEN INSTALLING DRIVEWAYS TO NOT UNDERMINE OR DAMAGE EXISTING SIDEWALKS. 3" OF 1-1/2" ROCK—,,- / 6" CRUSHED CONCRETE`6R APPROVED EQUIVALtNT TAPER DEPTH AND WIDTH IN 10' SIDEWALK CURB & GUTTER 70, 2S' \ / Miy/MSM 3" OF 1-1/2" ROCK OR 6" CRUSHED CONCRETE OF 1EIGHT PLAN WIMCO ROAD DRAIN CG -23* HIGH FLOW INLET PROTECTION CURB AND GUTTER MODEL DEFLECTOR PLATE OR CITY APPROVED EQUAL. OVERFLOW IS Y2 OF THE CURB BOX HEIGHT OVERFLOW AT TOP OF FILTER ASSEMBLY /--CURB * FOR THE NEW R -3290 -VB STANDARD CASTING, INSTALL WIMCO ROAD DRAIN CG -3290 OR CITY APPROVED EQUAL. Standard Plate Library City of Monticello �a FILTER AS DIAMETER, 6" ON -GRADE 10" AT LOW POINT HIGH-FLOW FABRIC Title: Inlet Protection Catch Basin Insert lR ate: 03-07 Plate No. evised:03-1 5 6004 TOP OF PROPOSED SUBGRADE THE TOP 3' SHALL BE COMPACTED AT A MIN OF 100% OF STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY (MN/DOT 2105) A MAX OF 2' LIFTS TO BE WETTED AND CONSOLIDATED BY VIBRATORY MEANS AND COMPACTED TO A MIN OF 95% OF STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY (MN/DOT 2105) 4' COVER COMPACTED TO 95% OF STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY WITHOUT THE USE OF HEAVY ROLLER EQUIPMENT 0.. GRANULAR BEDDING AS PER MN/DOT 3149.21' GRANULAR FOUNDATION WHERE ORDERED BY THE ENGINEER SHOVEL, PLACE, AND HAND COMPACT AROUND PIPE TO 12" ABOVE PIPE. VIBRATORY COMPACTION REQUIRED EACH SIDE OF PIPE, AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. 6' TO 7" DIA. ROLL ENCLOSED IN J PLASTIC OR POLYESTER NETTING TYPE 21 BIOROLL DITCH CHECK USE ON ROUGH GRADED AREAS 1" X 2" X 18" LONG WOODEN STAKES AT 1' 0" SPACING MAXIMUM. STAKES SHALL BE DRIVEN THROUGH THE BACK HALF OF THE BIOROLL AT AN ANGLE OF 45 DEGREES WITH THE TOP OF THE STAKE POINTING UPSTREAM. BIOROLL N45'PROVIDE 8" TO 10" OF EMBEDMENT DEPTH. FLOW 8" - 10" EMBEDMENT DEPTH BIORCLL STAKING DETAIL NOTE, WHEN MORE THAN 1 BIOROLL/COMPOST LOG IS NEEDED, OVERLAP ENDS A MINIMUM OF 6' AND STAKE Standard Plate Library City of Monticello ENTRENCH A MINIMUM OF 2' Title: Bio Log Staking Straw or Wood Bio Roll Date: 03-08 Plate No. Revised:6009 03-15 6" MAX TRANSVERSE & LONGITUDINAL BARS 5/8 FOR 18" TO 27" APRONS 3/4 FOR 30" & LARGER APRONS. i—� 16" ANCHOR TOP J & BOTH ENDS NOTE: 1. ALL TRASH GUARDS SHALL BE GALVANIZED AFTER FABRICATION PER MNDOT SPEC. 3392 & 3394. 2. APPLIES TO FLARED END SECTIONS 12" OR LARGER. 3. ALL NUTS AND BOLT ATTACHING TRASH GUARD TO THE FLARED END SECTION SHALL BE LEFT EXPOSED W H Z Q O W O W J CD — z a� O a �" �u W �O$ �$ obo oY3 otic y a w O m o oo o oo m I w O OV Q 77 VD VD VD Vr g 7 O O CL ¢ M ° o0 0 00 ooC z a it Q w m p a c� � 1 `ma a D > "ZW o x ZO 3 6� WW aDWWO W it W = a N a N 0 W fV W W JO NWW L J U O O t W c W x 9Z p r_''�,0 �Ty7% o o w W 7 O'� N O = W U Z O N U W O N wL>O g00 W KQ o'a mQw ° �Z wa zOa z ¢=w a N¢� O O �cl� z 0 a a.J 0 W J O o_ U a 0_ Of OL 01 > ' U OH xgo W z O ii U n U M Mm0rn N t0007NON p f[ 0 t0 W ao7tcrnon0m7Na M mbmNO09 c0 N ? N 7p N M M c0 x ^ _I p }7 to W 6 6 N 00 W N d pM7 NI�Oi�MI� � "NN 00 MM Vj 01�N II O W U — N --- O g o N V)_ C) V) (n Uo =n p e�r� }mNOt°m7tONmt07m00 Q) 1 Z U W �il}Mn M N p Lq 7 OtON7pmNnOM t° n n W ZIn o U M U W W ZJp��tV SHEET N0. OV N)7,t)tC (n Q W OOO�MtD LIJ — aO�n >N O�IiU 0 LLL C O L > ANN +' L N C7 N -0 C O Ii >N 1n W t0 N° 1°! II 0 7 d• tO OR t0 O— C — — — 0001vtrimmoi - toa (� Io g mLa rw,nato01MwN77nt°77oto Z rNNNM7 W U W II ON Q� ao o•� — ^�K — — — W t0 OO W MONNNMMaN O O --p +' L.L M O U =a o O rLi�T UNM7,n Na 00n W M NOO �,n M 071001 Mt001 IM n c6 t`!Cn „M Oi W O� U Cno �NNM ,nm ,n,n n x >16 �7ooMrn7�ulm7rn,n,nmo00 Z 0) DO 00 0000 A n W JOS O LL U SOV N,M<,t Z" t6 m Oi.-,7,(iNN in W = vl g W O jna0Fr000l W �In 00M Of lON00010 tON 0 W " � n QC) 6 - - c` aOle NN NM M Q 1 0- W II U vy� Lj WDoe UO H� op r�[n Oto O 01MOtO Ot000D 000000�01n M71nO MM 7 C)Ja d WM 0NNM7NtOm�M)tG Z —W >Q JUS ,•i,66nNriaa O!lM ISO W �NM77amn 0 2-t2 a ZN00 W Ka NM71n a�a Fn p a5 m2 N N notcNpppp70.N7lo N M M 7 71n w t0 n 00 0! 0 Standard Plate Library City of Monticello USE 4" OR 6" CISP PLUG AND CAP, TOP TO BE 1/2 " BELOW FINISHED GRADE VARIES 10' TO 20' N W z Y U L o N N �a a� =o r Oz F W zo W W Wm W Lx J W3 m z Title: Riprap Detail Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised: 4009 03-15 / TIES REQUIRED TO CLEAN OUTS FINISHED GRADE 6" PVC RISER FOR NON-RESIDENTIAL 4" PVC RISER FOR RESIDENTIAL 4" OR 6" VERTICAL WYE (PVC) 1/8 BENDS l CONCRETE ENCASEMENT \ 12" ALL AROUND (INCIDENTAL) WATER TIGHT GASKET OR CEMENTED PLUG PVC HORIZONTAL WYE (PVC) THRUST BLOCKING FOR CLEANING EQUIPMENT 1. PAYMENT FOR 6" RISER PIPE, 6" VERTICAL WYE 45' BEND AND PLUG WILL BE PAID FOR AT UNIT PRICE BID PER EACH. 2. CLEAN -OUTS REQUIRED AT 70' INTERVALS FROM MAIN SEWER LINE. Title: Title: Title: Title: Residential Gravel Typical Trench Compaction Trash Guard for Sanitary Clean -Out Standard Plate Library Construction Entrance Standard Plate Library and Class B Bedding A,,:,Standard Plate Library End Section �� Standard Plate Libraryy City of Monticello Date: Plate No. City of Monticello Date: Plate No. City of Monticello Date: Plate No. Clt of Monticello Date: 03-05 Plate No. 03-0503-05 03-05 Revised: 6001 Revised: 1007Revised: 4007 Revised: 3006 -- 03-15 � � 03-15 � � 03-15 � � 03-15 � z O a - Of U W W �1 g,n Q Q N Z�r .- WO W Ol fV Y 4 mol 0 c0 N 0 1M to W 6 6 N 00 ODN70,n j > F U > aU � In In N M M M N ZN II O � — N --- O g o N V)_ C) V) (n Uo =n p e�r� }mNOt°m7tONmt07m00 Q) 1 Z U W N W d � M Nf I,-0---Mo00wo ^ N N M M I n t° n n W ZIn o U M U o SHEET N0. (n Q W 0 LIJ — — — — Q 0 LLL C O L > S x O +' L N C7 N -0 C O Ii >N 1n W t0 N° 1°! OY 7 d• tO OR t0 O— C °! W Z7fV N)�tLi �Ooa�c E C 0001vtrimmoi Z toa (� >^ U Z rNNNM7 W U W II ON Q� ao o•� — — — — W � o Oar'� O O --p +' L.L M O U =a o O rLi�T 70100 Na 00n W M NOO �,n M 071001 Mt001 IM n c6 t`!Cn „M Oi W O� U Cno �NNM ,nm ,n,n n x Z 0) DO 00 0000 01 17 N n W Z" in W Hr W g W O jna0Fr000l W �In 00M Of lON00010 tON 0 ri W J0^Na6,6066 p n QC) 6 - - c` aOle NN NM M Q 1 0- W II U vy� Lj WDoe li W L.,.-1 > ZH �/r U aQ op T O ina 0001 1�a Ot000D U)WZ M71nO MM 7 C)Ja C Awa riu500 Z —W >Q JUS ,•i,66nNriaa o� �NM77amn 0 a�'L a ZN00 W Ka NM71n G00 In ,n MOO t0 n000�NMN N,n N007 Of i Standard Plate Library City of Monticello USE 4" OR 6" CISP PLUG AND CAP, TOP TO BE 1/2 " BELOW FINISHED GRADE VARIES 10' TO 20' N W z Y U L o N N �a a� =o r Oz F W zo W W Wm W Lx J W3 m z Title: Riprap Detail Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised: 4009 03-15 / TIES REQUIRED TO CLEAN OUTS FINISHED GRADE 6" PVC RISER FOR NON-RESIDENTIAL 4" PVC RISER FOR RESIDENTIAL 4" OR 6" VERTICAL WYE (PVC) 1/8 BENDS l CONCRETE ENCASEMENT \ 12" ALL AROUND (INCIDENTAL) WATER TIGHT GASKET OR CEMENTED PLUG PVC HORIZONTAL WYE (PVC) THRUST BLOCKING FOR CLEANING EQUIPMENT 1. PAYMENT FOR 6" RISER PIPE, 6" VERTICAL WYE 45' BEND AND PLUG WILL BE PAID FOR AT UNIT PRICE BID PER EACH. 2. CLEAN -OUTS REQUIRED AT 70' INTERVALS FROM MAIN SEWER LINE. Title: Title: Title: Title: Residential Gravel Typical Trench Compaction Trash Guard for Sanitary Clean -Out Standard Plate Library Construction Entrance Standard Plate Library and Class B Bedding A,,:,Standard Plate Library End Section �� Standard Plate Libraryy City of Monticello Date: Plate No. City of Monticello Date: Plate No. City of Monticello Date: Plate No. Clt of Monticello Date: 03-05 Plate No. 03-0503-05 03-05 Revised: 6001 Revised: 1007Revised: 4007 Revised: 3006 -- 03-15 � � 03-15 � � 03-15 � � 03-15 � z O a - Of U W W Q Q C) _j/^' I..L W � Z � In In O Z O � � N O O N V)_ C) O V Q) 1 Z U W � I r M m Q LLI Z W __J O M U o SHEET N0. (n Q W 0 LIJ Q Ll -I Of _ J 0 0 0 0 0 LLL C O L +' L N C7 N -0 C O C N O 0 O Ln O— C O �Ooa�c E C Z 0 + W - Z -0 p O 0 O d p N 0 --+° ON Q� ao o•� Q• o� (n N Oar'� O O --p +' L.L M v�_W�o t'U N U �N CO � L T _ 01= _0 Cno ZN C14 O Z 0) 00 0000 01 17 N n W Z" in W Hr W W W0 '1 DID n QC) V(D Z 040 i j00 W � Lj WDoe li W L.,.-1 > ZH �/r a U)ZU 04 N fir) U)WZ LL co O C)Ja (r M W Z —W >Q JUS r .. on n I--- Q Z V _j/^' I..L W � Z W � O O V) U V W Z U D � I � - Lv Z = O w M U o SHEET N0. 8 _Q Q0 6A nn{ J 9focl w a d U � U 3� 4.1.mu.W :, q—a 1Otluew o �1a40:""'Jld LLOULL&A-a M.0 •e ARn U3znoa Lnalv� BupyBr7 --3 a•c7a4O :aweN 4-P U-10--M-od pdedmd !€i .. � .. .• i,�-{ - F O L, E N E N w >- J- 'k ' 6`-4 : 60 • fits - iib : •�� �iN ,;, ,•N � : a.`�' -• F O L, E N E N w >- J- 'k ' 60 • fits - iib : •�� �iN ,;, ,•N � : a.`�' -• V 00 i---^`'-+,-.,fir--�"-�'•--.-�,L�- - : _ M. N ��.-._..:_ .��:.-:'._,. iV R • N C, LI) ..O':': Lo:'"' yN . �N •N. •(N •� +� 1 40 -j •C) �D C) •CD •p, �p F O L, E N E N w >- t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 C� O W a w x -� D W x Q I I I I I I I I n L — L _ / L — / I -uT — — — — — — - Ar www I II I j I EJ SBL SBL * SBL BL I I r r- 'N n r� / I l / / I L / I S13L SBL I ' I I PHASE 1 I w i1 �i IN I � I EXISTING BITUMINOUS I I w� I I \I I PARKING SURFACE a c I N I\ I EXISTING FENCE AND GATE I o �' I / TO REMAIN FOR PHASE I I' III I �— H I I Imm o I \ I I I I I I I I Ap i UE1 I � EXIT(BU LDINQ FUTUf � I I FHASI I u) 0,� J / / 2 \ • d I O .: • d d •d b y • d I / / r , m. '• •e .e •d• d d • d WI I I m 44 = I I to I I I I • e I a. 4 ♦ e . q . , f •e w UT / , III , 5/.6 r --i d I 11 F— I I I I I I I O I I CD I N I I I I I I I I =w1 I I I I I I I I I EXISTING (GRAVEL I I I I I l o I I (TYP) I N I J Block W I I I I I I IlO jCn OX I / �i IN ' I I I I I I I ly I wi I mi IN J xi b 01 I 11 I I EXISTING BUILDINSI I I 4 I° I m I I I I W d. o I II I I I N I II WI � I I II W� I IP i N i II � � les I— les les hl-------I---------------J w x 91 d d • 4. d d • , • •d • •d • /J!\X, 8 PHASE I PARKING (SEE CIVIL PLANS) PHASE I BUILDING (SEE CIVIL PLANS) FUTURE PHASE PARKING (CHIP SEAL OR OTHER CITY ENGINEER APPROVED SURFACING ALTERNATIVE) FUTURE PHASE BUILDING (ON EXISTING CONCRETE PAD) I� 34.5 I _ II� I; O T---�`-EXISTING BUILDING A II ,";y 1. I' I ImI W II C I I I I I �I ly IW C has -les-les las l®S L— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — I C EXISTING BUILDING N90000'00"E 33/.50 O 30 0 30 U SCALE IN FEET w _ o SCALE: 111 = 30' W Q C) > O W n n N "' n n n n n n n n n n n n. n r II it N I I Q �wz c� �o ~ O � i O XJ W EXISTING BUILDING N90000'00"E 33/.50 O 30 0 30 U SCALE IN FEET w _ o SCALE: 111 = 30' W Q C) > O W N O N "' Z Q W 00 0000 W 01 O a a W O m Of N H N I Q �wz c� �o ~ O � � O XJ W 0 a- I r - (� m m C Z m o w (n -J LLJ O z Z Y � Lij c� Q w 0 W Q Li of _ J 0 0 U L- <= O L D -O N O 1 °c O m7EO aL C, °+ N 0 Q): L0 ° O— Q) 41 p c)E Z 41 W - z O 0 O ° p oa.°ami° a).T0V) m-0 (,n O U a) y Q) °-•` J o L a> -0 a) L a) +� t >,— - 0 1=-0� ■ Z ♦ ♦ N O N "' Z Q W 00 0000 W 01 n r7 N W In � �N Z Q W � � W �r W a a Y w� U) m n (3 Z i j(-4 OC7Z z� W� >-- W li W L�-I U) > Z Of Z H N I W �wz c� QJ� O �� 0 Z5a- J6:<2 r .. W > OJ L')� Z Q 0 W Of Z C) W ~ O C O XJ W 0 Q W (� Z C Z 0 _j (n -J LLJ O m C :2QL Bogart, Pederson & Associates, Inc. LAND SURVEYING CIVIL ENGINEERING MAPPING DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS for 100 Chelsea Rd. Drainage to Chelsea Rd. ROW City of Monticello, Wright County, MN Prepared for: Red Rooster Properties, Inc. Date: June 21, 2017 Prepared by: Jeffrey Swanson I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Engineer under the State of Minnesota Statues Sections 326.02 to 326.16 M";j el�� Jeffrey Swanson, P.E. Date: 6/21/2017 Reg. No. 50203 Main Office: Becker Phone: 763/262-8822 13076 First Street Toll free: 888/210-8301 Becker. MN 55308 Fax: 763/262-8844 1. SITE LOCATION AND EXISTING CONDITIONS: Site location: The site is located on Chelsea Road in the City of Monticello. Existing Site Conditions: The site is currently vacant. Total site area = 1.88 acres. Surrounding Land Uses: The property is part of an business/industrial park. Onsite Soils: The onsite soils are primarily Dorser sandy loam. These soils are considered a hydrologic group type `B". 2. PROPOSED SITE IMPROVEMENTS Proposed construction includes an office building, serviced by the proposed paved parking lot in front of the building. The total new impervious area will be 0.24 acre. Grading will take place on 0.35 acres on the site. 3. STORMWATER MANAGMENT Curb and gutter of the proposed parking lot will contain runoff from the driveway and the parking lot. The catch basin will discharge the runoff from the parking lot to the road ditch. A swale will be constructed east of the parking lot and building which will drain to the roadway ditch and prevent any roof runoff from draining east on to the neighboring property. The HydroCAD analysis is attached for the existing and proposed conditions. The Rational Method 10 year peak flow through the catch basin is 1.68 cfs @ 5.3 fps through the 15" RCP pipe. The discharge rate of the road ditch east of the driveway entrance is as follows: Ditch Discharge Summary Table Discharge 2 year event 10 year event 100 year event Existing (0.5 AC) 0.83 cfs 1.42 cfs 2.78 cfs Proposed (0.9 AC) 2.05 cfs 3.31 cfs 6.01 cfs The discharge rate of the undisturbed area south of the proposed building that flows to the eastern property is as follows: Offsite Discharge Summary Table Discharge 2 year event 10 year event 100 year event Existing (0.9 AC) 2.61 cfs 4.06 cfs 6.91 cfs Proposed (0.5 AC) 1.42 cfs 2.18 cfs 3.68 cfs 4. NPDES CONSIDERATIONS Since the project will disturb less than 1 acre, a Stormwater Permit for Construction is not required. NW. Ditch NW. Ex. Parking NE. Ex. Parking & Building & Conc. :h E of Driveway To E. of Site Subcat Reach on Link Routing Diagram for Existing I Prepared by BPA, Printed 5/4/2017 HydroCAD®10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Existing Prepared by BPA HvdroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Area Listing (all nodes) Area CN Description (acres) (subcatchment-numbers) 0.085 79 <50% Grass cover, Poor, HSG B (3S) 0.242 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B (1 S) 0.529 96 Gravel surface, HSG C (3S) 0.590 98 Paved parking, HSG C (2S, 3S) 1.445 90 TOTAL AREA Existing Conditions Printed 5/4/2017 Paqe 2 Existing Conditions Existing Type 1124 -hr 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81 " Prepared by BPA Printed 5/4/2017 HvdroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 3 Time span=1.00-72.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 7101 points Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN Reach routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method Subcatchment 1S: NW. Ditch Runoff Area=10,522 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=0.30" Tc=15.0 min CN=61 Runoff=0.05 cfs 0.006 of Subcatchment 2S: NW. Ex. Parking Runoff Area=11,491 sf 100.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.58" Tc=15.0 min CN=98 Runoff=0.79 cfs 0.057 of Subcatchment 3S: NE. Ex. Parking & Runoff Area=40,933 sf 34.66% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.26" Tc=15.0 min CN=95 Runoff=2.61 cfs 0.177 of Reach 2R: N. Ditch E of Driveway Inflow=0.83 cfs 0.063 of Outflow=0.83 cfs 0.063 of Pond 1P: N. Culvert Peak Elev=961.55' Inflow=0.05 cfs 0.006 of Outflow=0.05 cfs 0.006 of Pond 3P: To E. of Site Inflow=2.61 cfs 0.177 of Primary=2.61 cfs 0.177 of Total Runoff Area = 1.445 ac Runoff Volume = 0.240 of Average Runoff Depth = 1.99" 59.20% Pervious = 0.856 ac 40.80% Impervious = 0.590 ac Existing Conditions Existing Type 1124 -hr 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81 " Prepared by BPA Printed 5/4/2017 HvdroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 4 Summary for Subcatchment 1S: NW. Ditch Runoff = 0.05 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 0.006 af, Depth= 0.30" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24 -hr 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81" Area (sf) CN Description 10,522 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 10,522 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 2S: NW. Ex. Parking Runoff = 0.79 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.057 af, Depth= 2.58" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24 -hr 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81" Area (sf) CN Description 11,491 98 Paved parkinq, HSG C 11,491 100.00% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 3S: NE. Ex. Parking & Building & Conc. Runoff = 2.61 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.177 af, Depth= 2.26" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24 -hr 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81" Area (sf) CN Description 14,188 98 Paved parking, HSG C 23,042 96 Gravel surface, HSG C 3,703 79 <50% Grass cover, Poor, HSG B 40,933 95 Weighted Average 26,745 65.34% Pervious Area 14,188 34.66% Impervious Area Existing Conditions Existing Type 1124 -hr 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81 " Prepared by BPA Printed 5/4/2017 HvdroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 5 Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Reach 2R: N. Ditch E of Driveway Inflow Area = 0.505 ac, 52.20% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.49" for 2 -Year event Inflow = 0.83 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 0.063 of Outflow = 0.83 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 0.063 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Summary for Pond 1 P: N. Culvert Inflow Area = 0.242 ac, 0.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.30" for 2 -Year event Inflow = 0.05 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 0.006 of Outflow = 0.05 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 0.006 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary = 0.05 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 0.006 of Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 961.55'@ 12.12 hrs Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 961.45' 15.0" Round RCP -Round 15" L= 41.0' RCP, end -section conforming to fill, Ke= 0.500 Inlet/ Outlet Invert= 961.45'/961.03' S=0.0102'/' Cc= 0.900 n=0.012 Concrete pipe, finished, Flow Area= 1.23 sf #2 Primary 962.20' 6.0' long x 6.0' breadth 962.2 Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 Coef. (English) 2.37 2.51 2.70 2.68 2.68 2.67 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.66 2.66 2.67 2.69 2.72 2.76 2.83 Primary OutFlow Max=0.05 cfs @ 12.12 hrs HW=961.55' TW=0.00' (Dynamic Tailwater) �__2=962.2_ 1=RCPRound 15" (Barrel Controls 0.05 cfs @ 1.62 fps) ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Summary for Pond 3P: To E. of Site Inflow Area = 0.940 ac, 34.66% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.26" for 2 -Year event Inflow = 2.61 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.177 of Primary = 2.61 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.177 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Existing Conditions Existing Type 11 24 -hr 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" Prepared by BPA Printed 5/4/2017 HvdroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 6 Time span=1.00-72.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 7101 points Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN Reach routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method Subcatchment 1S: NW. Ditch Runoff Area=10,522 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=0.91" Tc=15.0 min CN=61 Runoff=0.25 cfs 0.018 of Subcatchment 2S: NW. Ex. Parking Runoff Area=11,491 sf 100.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.94" Tc=15.0 min CN=98 Runoff=1.18 cfs 0.087 of Subcatchment 3S: NE. Ex. Parking & Runoff Area=40,933 sf 34.66% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.61" Tc=15.0 min CN=95 Runoff=4.06 cfs 0.283 of Reach 2R: N. Ditch E of Driveway Inflow=1.42 cfs 0.105 of Outflow=1.42 cfs 0.105 of Pond 1P: N. Culvert Peak Elev=961.68' Inflow=0.25 cfs 0.018 of Outflow=0.25 cfs 0.018 of Pond 3P: To E. of Site Inflow=4.06 cfs 0.283 of Primary=4.06 cfs 0.283 of Total Runoff Area = 1.445 ac Runoff Volume = 0.388 of Average Runoff Depth = 3.22" 59.20% Pervious = 0.856 ac 40.80% Impervious = 0.590 ac Existing Conditions Existing Type 11 24 -hr 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" Prepared by BPA Printed 5/4/2017 HvdroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 7 Summary for Subcatchment 1S: NW. Ditch Runoff = 0.25 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.018 af, Depth= 0.91" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24 -hr 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" Area (sf) CN Description 10,522 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 10,522 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 2S: NW. Ex. Parking Runoff = 1.18 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.087 af, Depth= 3.94" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24 -hr 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" Area (sf) CN Description 11,491 98 Paved parkinq, HSG C 11,491 100.00% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 3S: NE. Ex. Parking & Building & Conc. Runoff = 4.06 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.283 af, Depth= 3.61" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24 -hr 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" Area (sf) CN Description 14,188 98 Paved parking, HSG C 23,042 96 Gravel surface, HSG C 3,703 79 <50% Grass cover, Poor, HSG B 40,933 95 Weighted Average 26,745 65.34% Pervious Area 14,188 34.66% Impervious Area Existing Conditions Existing Type 11 24 -hr 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" Prepared by BPA Printed 5/4/2017 HvdroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 8 Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Reach 2R: N. Ditch E of Driveway Inflow Area = 0.505 ac, 52.20% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.49" for 10 -Year event Inflow = 1.42 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 0.105 of Outflow = 1.42 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 0.105 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Summary for Pond 1 P: N. Culvert Inflow Area = 0.242 ac, 0.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.91" for 10 -Year event Inflow = 0.25 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.018 of Outflow = 0.25 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.018 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary = 0.25 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.018 of Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 961.68'@ 12.09 hrs Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 961.45' 15.0" Round RCP -Round 15" L= 41.0' RCP, end -section conforming to fill, Ke= 0.500 Inlet/ Outlet Invert= 961.45'/961.03' S=0.0102'/' Cc= 0.900 n=0.012 Concrete pipe, finished, Flow Area= 1.23 sf #2 Primary 962.20' 6.0' long x 6.0' breadth 962.2 Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 Coef. (English) 2.37 2.51 2.70 2.68 2.68 2.67 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.66 2.66 2.67 2.69 2.72 2.76 2.83 Primary OutFlow Max=0.25 cfs @ 12.09 hrs HW=961.68' TW=0.00' (Dynamic Tailwater) �__2=962.2_ 1=RCPRound 15" (Inlet Controls 0.25 cfs @ 1.62 fps) ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Summary for Pond 3P: To E. of Site Inflow Area = 0.940 ac, 34.66% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 3.61" for 10 -Year event Inflow = 4.06 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.283 of Primary = 4.06 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.283 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Existing Conditions Existing Type 1124 -hr 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Prepared by BPA Printed 5/4/2017 HvdroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 9 Time span=1.00-72.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 7101 points Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN Reach routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method Subcatchment 1S: NW. Ditch Runoff Area=10,522 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.65" Tc=15.0 min CN=61 Runoff=0.82 cfs 0.053 of Subcatchment 2S: NW. Ex. Parking Runoff Area=11,491 sf 100.00% Impervious Runoff Depth>6.69" Tc=15.0 min CN=98 Runoff=1.97 cfs 0.147 of Subcatchment 3S: NE. Ex. Parking & Runoff Area=40,933 sf 34.66% Impervious Runoff Depth=6.34" Tc=15.0 min CN=95 Runoff=6.91 cfs 0.496 of Reach 2R: N. Ditch E of Driveway Inflow=2.78 cfs 0.200 of Outflow=2.78 cfs 0.200 of Pond 1P: N. Culvert Peak Elev=961.88' Inflow=0.82 cfs 0.053 of Outflow=0.82 cfs 0.053 of Pond 3P: To E. of Site Inflow=6.91 cfs 0.496 of Primary=6.91 cfs 0.496 of Total Runoff Area = 1.445 ac Runoff Volume = 0.697 of Average Runoff Depth = 5.78" 59.20% Pervious = 0.856 ac 40.80% Impervious = 0.590 ac Existing Conditions Existing Type 1124 -hr 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Prepared by BPA Printed 5/4/2017 HvdroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 10 Summary for Subcatchment 1S: NW. Ditch Runoff = 0.82 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 0.053 af, Depth= 2.65" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24 -hr 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Area (sf) CN Description 10,522 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 10,522 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 2S: NW. Ex. Parking Runoff = 1.97 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.147 af, Depth> 6.69" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24 -hr 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Area (sf) CN Description 11,491 98 Paved parking, HSG C 11,491 100.00% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 3S: NE. Ex. Parking & Building & Conc. Runoff = 6.91 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.496 af, Depth= 6.34" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24 -hr 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Area (sf) CN Description 14,188 98 Paved parking, HSG C 23,042 96 Gravel surface, HSG C 3,703 79 <50% Grass cover, Poor, HSG B 40,933 95 Weighted Average 26,745 65.34% Pervious Area 14,188 34.66% Impervious Area Existing Conditions Existing Type 1124 -hr 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Prepared by BPA Printed 5/4/2017 HvdroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 11 Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Reach 2R: N. Ditch E of Driveway Inflow Area = 0.505 ac, 52.20% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 4.76" for 100 -Year event Inflow = 2.78 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 0.200 of Outflow = 2.78 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 0.200 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Summary for Pond 1 P: N. Culvert Inflow Area = 0.242 ac, 0.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.65" for 100 -Year event Inflow = 0.82 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 0.053 of Outflow = 0.82 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 0.053 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary = 0.82 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 0.053 of Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 961.88'@ 12.08 hrs Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 961.45' 15.0" Round RCP -Round 15" L= 41.0' RCP, end -section conforming to fill, Ke= 0.500 Inlet/ Outlet Invert= 961.45'/961.03' S=0.0102'/' Cc= 0.900 n=0.012 Concrete pipe, finished, Flow Area= 1.23 sf #2 Primary 962.20' 6.0' long x 6.0' breadth 962.2 Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 Coef. (English) 2.37 2.51 2.70 2.68 2.68 2.67 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.66 2.66 2.67 2.69 2.72 2.76 2.83 Primary OutFlow Max=0.82 cfs @ 12.08 hrs HW=961.88' TW=0.00' (Dynamic Tailwater) �__2=962.2_ 1=RCPRound 15" (Barrel Controls 0.82 cfs @ 3.30 fps) ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Summary for Pond 3P: To E. of Site Inflow Area = 0.940 ac, 34.66% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 6.34" for 100 -Year event Inflow = 6.91 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.496 of Primary = 6.91 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.496 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Aic 2R N. Ditc *Driveway Driveway � S N. Culvert NW. Ditch CB 3P 2S CB to N. Ditch NW. Ex. Parking 3S 3BS Drainage to CB Drainage to Swale 4S To E. of Site NE. Ex. Parking & Building & Conc. Subcat Reach on LinkRouting Diagram for Proposed I Prepared by BPA, Printed 6/21/2017 HydroCADO 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Proposed Prepared by BPA HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Area Listing (all nodes) Area CN Description (acres) (subcatchment-numbers) 0.094 79 <50% Grass cover, Poor, HSG B (313S, 4S) 0.242 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B (1 S) 0.278 96 Gravel surface, HSG B (4S) 0.452 98 Paved parking, HSG B (3S, 4S) 0.264 98 Paved parking, HSG C (2S) 0.115 98 Roofs, HSG B (313S, 3S) 1.444 90 TOTAL AREA Proposed Printed 6/21/2017 Paqe 2 Proposed Proposed Type 1124 -hr 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81 " Prepared by BPA Printed 6/21/2017 HvdroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 3 Time span=1.00-72.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 7101 points Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN Reach routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method Subcatchment 1S: NW. Ditch Runoff Area=10.522 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=0.30" Tc=15.0 min CN=61 Runoff=0.05 cfs 0.006 of Subcatchment 2S: NW. Ex. Parking Runoff Area=11.491 sf 100.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.58" Tc=15.0 min CN=98 Runoff=0.79 cfs 0.057 of Subcatchment 3BS: Drainage to Swale Runoff Area=6,600 sf 57.27% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.81" Tc=15.0 min CN=90 Runoff=0.35 cfs 0.023 of Subcatchment 3S: Drainage to CB Runoff Area=12.630 sf 100.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.58" Tc=15.0 min CN=98 Runoff=0.87 cfs 0.062 of Subcatchment 4S: NE. Ex. Parking & Runoff Area=21.657 sf 38.19% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.37" Tc=15.0 min CN=96 Runoff=1.42 cfs 0.098 of Reach 2R: N. Ditch E of Driveway Inflow=2.05 cfs 0.148 of Outflow=2.05 cfs 0.148 of Pond 1P: N. Culvert Peak Elev=961.55' Inflow=0.05 cfs 0.006 of Outflow=0.05 cfs 0.006 of Pond 3P: CB to N. Ditch Peak Elev=960.20' Inflow=0.87 cfs 0.062 of Outflow=0.87 cfs 0.062 of Pond 4P: To E. of Site Inflow=1.42 cfs 0.098 of Primary=1.42 cfs 0.098 of Total Runoff Area = 1.444 ac Runoff Volume = 0.246 of Average Runoff Depth = 2.04" 42.49% Pervious= 0.614 ac 57.51% Impervious = 0.830 ac Proposed Proposed Type 1124 -hr 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81 " Prepared by BPA Printed 6/21/2017 HvdroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 4 Summary for Subcatchment 1S: NW. Ditch Runoff = 0.05 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 0.006 af, Depth= 0.30" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24 -hr 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81" Area (sf) CN Description 10,522 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 10,522 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 2S: NW. Ex. Parking Runoff = 0.79 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.057 af, Depth= 2.58" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24 -hr 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81" Area (sf) 11,491 11,491 Tc Length (min) (feet) 15.0 Runoff = CN Description 98 Paved parking, HSG C 100.00% Impervious Area Slope Velocity Capacity Description (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 313S: Drainage to Swale 0.35 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 0.023 af, Depth= 1.81" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24 -hr 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81" Area (sf) CN Description 3,780 98 Roofs, HSG B 2,820 79 <50% Grass cover, Poor, HSG B 6,600 90 Weighted Average 2,820 42.73% Pervious Area 3,780 57.27% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) Oft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Proposed Proposed Type 1124 -hr 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81 " Prepared by BPA Printed 6/21/2017 HvdroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 5 Summary for Subcatchment 3S: Drainage to CB Runoff = 0.87 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.062 af, Depth= 2.58" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24 -hr 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81" Area (sf) CN Description 11,410 98 Paved parking, HSG B 1,220 98 Roofs, HSG B 12,630 98 Weighted Average 12,630 100.00% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) Oft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 4S: NE. Ex. Parking & Building & Conc. Runoff = 1.42 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.098 af, Depth= 2.37" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24 -hr 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81" Area (sf) CN Description 8,270 98 Paved parking, HSG B 12,115 96 Gravel surface, HSG B 1,272 79 <50% Grass cover, Poor, HSG B 21,657 96 Weighted Average 13,387 61.81 % Pervious Area 8,270 38.19% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Reach 2R: N. Ditch E of Driveway Inflow Area = 0.947 ac, 67.65% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.87" for 2 -Year event Inflow = 2.05 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 0.148 of Outflow = 2.05 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 0.148 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Proposed Proposed Type 1124 -hr 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81 " Prepared by BPA Printed 6/21/2017 HvdroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 6 Summary for Pond 1 P: N. Culvert Inflow Area = 0.242 ac, 0.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.30" for 2 -Year event Inflow = 0.05 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 0.006 of Outflow = 0.05 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 0.006 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary = 0.05 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 0.006 of Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 961.55'@ 12.12 hrs Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 961.45' 15.0" Round RCP -Round 15" L= 41.0' RCP, end -section conforming to fill, Ke= 0.500 Inlet/ Outlet Invert= 961.45'/961.03' S=0.0102'/' Cc= 0.900 n=0.012 Concrete pipe, finished, Flow Area= 1.23 sf #2 Primary 962.20' 6.0' long x 6.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 Coef. (English) 2.37 2.51 2.70 2.68 2.68 2.67 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.66 2.66 2.67 2.69 2.72 2.76 2.83 Primary OutFlow Max=0.05 cfs @ 12.12 hrs HW=961.55' TW=0.00' (Dynamic Tailwater) 1=RCPRound 15" (Barrel Controls 0.05 cfs @ 1.62 fps) L2=Broa-d-Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Summary for Pond 3P: CB to N. Ditch Inflow Area = 0.290 ac,100.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth= 2.58" for 2 -Year event Inflow = 0.87 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.062 of Outflow = 0.87 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.062 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary = 0.87 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.062 of Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 960.20'@ 12.06 hrs Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 959.70' 15.0" Round Culvert L= 10.0' RCP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500 Inlet/ Outlet Invert= 959.70'/959.60' S=0.0100'/' Cc= 0.900 n=0.012 Concrete pipe, finished, Flow Area= 1.23 sf #2 Primary 962.30' 4.0' long x 0.5' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 Coef. (English) 2.80 2.92 3.08 3.30 3.32 Primary OutFlow Max=0.87 cfs @ 12.06 hrs HW=960.20' TW=0.00' (Dynamic Tailwater) �11=Culvert (Barrel Controls 0.87 cfs @ 2.81 fps) 2=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Proposed Proposed Type 1124 -hr 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81 " Prepared by BPA Printed 6/21/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 7 Summary for Pond 4P: To E. of Site Inflow Area = 0.497 ac, 38.19% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.37" for 2 -Year event Inflow = 1.42 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.098 of Primary = 1.42 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.098 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Proposed Proposed Type 11 24 -hr 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" Prepared by BPA Printed 6/21/2017 HvdroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 8 Time span=1.00-72.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 7101 points Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN Reach routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method Subcatchment 1S: NW. Ditch Runoff Area=10.522 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=0.91" Tc=15.0 min CN=61 Runoff=0.25 cfs 0.018 of Subcatchment 2S: NW. Ex. Parking Runoff Area=11.491 sf 100.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.94" Tc=15.0 min CN=98 Runoff=1.18 cfs 0.087 of Subcatchment 3BS: Drainage to Swale Runoff Area=6,600 sf 57.27% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.09" Tc=15.0 min CN=90 Runoff=0.59 cfs 0.039 of Subcatchment 3S: Drainage to CB Runoff Area=12.630 sf 100.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.94" Tc=15.0 min CN=98 Runoff=1.30 cfs 0.095 of Subcatchment 4S: NE. Ex. Parking & Runoff Area=21.657 sf 38.19% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.72" Tc=15.0 min CN=96 Runoff=2.18 cfs 0.154 of Reach 2R: N. Ditch E of Driveway Inflow=3.31 cfs 0.239 of Outflow=3.31 cfs 0.239 of Pond 1P: N. Culvert Peak Elev=961.68' Inflow=0.25 cfs 0.018 of Outflow=0.25 cfs 0.018 of Pond 3P: CB to N. Ditch Peak Elev=960.33' Inflow=1.30 cfs 0.095 of Outflow=1.30 cfs 0.095 of Pond 4P: To E. of Site Inflow=2.18 cfs 0.154 of Primary=2.18 cfs 0.154 of Total Runoff Area = 1.444 ac Runoff Volume = 0.393 of Average Runoff Depth = 3.27" 42.49% Pervious= 0.614 ac 57.51% Impervious = 0.830 ac Proposed Proposed Type 11 24 -hr 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" Prepared by BPA Printed 6/21/2017 HvdroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 9 Summary for Subcatchment 1S: NW. Ditch Runoff = 0.25 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.018 af, Depth= 0.91" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24 -hr 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" Area (sf) CN Description 10,522 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 10,522 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 2S: NW. Ex. Parking Runoff = 1.18 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.087 af, Depth= 3.94" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24 -hr 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" Area (sf) 11,491 11,491 Tc Length (min) (feet) 15.0 Runoff = CN Description 98 Paved parking, HSG C 100.00% Impervious Area Slope Velocity Capacity Description (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 313S: Drainage to Swale 0.59 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 0.039 af, Depth= 3.09" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24 -hr 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" Area (sf) CN Description 3,780 98 Roofs, HSG B 2,820 79 <50% Grass cover, Poor, HSG B 6,600 90 Weighted Average 2,820 42.73% Pervious Area 3,780 57.27% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) Oft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Proposed Proposed Type 11 24 -hr 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" Prepared by BPA Printed 6/21/2017 HvdroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 10 Summary for Subcatchment 3S: Drainage to CB Runoff = 1.30 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.095 af, Depth= 3.94" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24 -hr 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" Area (sf) CN Description 11,410 98 Paved parking, HSG B 1,220 98 Roofs, HSG B 12,630 98 Weighted Average 12,630 100.00% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) Oft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 4S: NE. Ex. Parking & Building & Conc. Runoff = 2.18 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.154 af, Depth= 3.72" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24 -hr 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" Area (sf) CN Description 8,270 98 Paved parking, HSG B 12,115 96 Gravel surface, HSG B 1,272 79 <50% Grass cover, Poor, HSG B 21,657 96 Weighted Average 13,387 61.81 % Pervious Area 8,270 38.19% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Reach 2R: N. Ditch E of Driveway Inflow Area = 0.947 ac, 67.65% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 3.03" for 10 -Year event Inflow = 3.31 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 0.239 of Outflow = 3.31 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 0.239 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Proposed Proposed Type 11 24 -hr 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" Prepared by BPA Printed 6/21/2017 HvdroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 11 Summary for Pond 1 P: N. Culvert Inflow Area = 0.242 ac, 0.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.91" for 10 -Year event Inflow = 0.25 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.018 of Outflow = 0.25 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.018 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary = 0.25 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.018 of Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 961.68'@ 12.09 hrs Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 961.45' 15.0" Round RCP -Round 15" L= 41.0' RCP, end -section conforming to fill, Ke= 0.500 Inlet/ Outlet Invert= 961.45'/961.03' S=0.0102'/' Cc= 0.900 n=0.012 Concrete pipe, finished, Flow Area= 1.23 sf #2 Primary 962.20' 6.0' long x 6.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 Coef. (English) 2.37 2.51 2.70 2.68 2.68 2.67 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.66 2.66 2.67 2.69 2.72 2.76 2.83 Primary OutFlow Max=0.25 cfs @ 12.09 hrs HW=961.68' TW=0.00' (Dynamic Tailwater) 1=RCPRound 15" (Inlet Controls 0.25 cfs @ 1.62 fps) L2=Broa-d-Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Summary for Pond 3P: CB to N. Ditch Inflow Area = 0.290 ac,100.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 3.94" for 10 -Year event Inflow = 1.30 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.095 of Outflow = 1.30 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.095 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary = 1.30 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.095 of Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 960.33'@ 12.06 hrs Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 959.70' 15.0" Round Culvert L= 10.0' RCP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500 Inlet/ Outlet Invert= 959.70'/959.60' S=0.0100'/' Cc= 0.900 n=0.012 Concrete pipe, finished, Flow Area= 1.23 sf #2 Primary 962.30' 4.0' long x 0.5' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 Coef. (English) 2.80 2.92 3.08 3.30 3.32 Primary OutFlow Max=1.30 cfs @ 12.06 hrs HW=960.33' TW=0.00' (Dynamic Tailwater) �11=Culvert (Barrel Controls 1.30 cfs @ 3.07 fps) 2=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Proposed Proposed Type 11 24 -hr 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" Prepared by BPA Printed 6/21/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 12 Summary for Pond 4P: To E. of Site Inflow Area = 0.497 ac, 38.19% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 3.72" for 10 -Year event Inflow = 2.18 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.154 of Primary = 2.18 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.154 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Proposed Proposed Type 1124 -hr 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Prepared by BPA Printed 6/21/2017 HvdroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 13 Time span=1.00-72.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 7101 points Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN Reach routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method Subcatchment 1S: NW. Ditch Runoff Area=10.522 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.65" Tc=15.0 min CN=61 Runoff=0.82 cfs 0.053 of Subcatchment 2S: NW. Ex. Parking Runoff Area=11.491 sf 100.00% Impervious Runoff Depth>6.69" Tc=15.0 min CN=98 Runoff=1.97 cfs 0.147 of Subcatchment 3BS: Drainage to Swale Runoff Area=6,600 sf 57.27% Impervious Runoff Depth=5.75" Tc=15.0 min CN=90 Runoff=1.06 cfs 0.073 of Subcatchment 3S: Drainage to CB Runoff Area=12.630 sf 100.00% Impervious Runoff Depth>6.69" Tc=15.0 min CN=98 Runoff=2.17 cfs 0.162 of Subcatchment 4S: NE. Ex. Parking & Runoff Area=21.657 sf 38.19% Impervious Runoff Depth=6.45" Tc=15.0 min CN=96 Runoff=3.68 cfs 0.267 of Reach 2R: N. Ditch E of Driveway Inflow=6.01 cfs 0.435 of Outflow=6.01 cfs 0.435 of Pond 1P: N. Culvert Peak Elev=961.88' Inflow=0.82 cfs 0.053 of Outflow=0.82 cfs 0.053 of Pond 3P: CB to N. Ditch Peak Elev=960.55' Inflow=2.17 cfs 0.162 of Outflow=2.17 cfs 0.162 of Pond 4P: To E. of Site Inflow=3.68 cfs 0.267 of Primary=3.68 cfs 0.267 of Total Runoff Area = 1.444 ac Runoff Volume = 0.702 of Average Runoff Depth = 5.83" 42.49% Pervious= 0.614 ac 57.51% Impervious = 0.830 ac Proposed Proposed Type 1124 -hr 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Prepared by BPA Printed 6/21/2017 HvdroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 14 Summary for Subcatchment 1S: NW. Ditch Runoff = 0.82 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 0.053 af, Depth= 2.65" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24 -hr 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Area (sf) CN Description 10,522 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 10,522 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 2S: NW. Ex. Parking Runoff = 1.97 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.147 af, Depth> 6.69" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24 -hr 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Area (sf) 11,491 11,491 Tc Length (min) (feet) 15.0 Runoff = CN Description 98 Paved parking, HSG C 100.00% Impervious Area Slope Velocity Capacity Description (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 313S: Drainage to Swale 1.06 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.073 af, Depth= 5.75" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24 -hr 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Area (sf) CN Description 3,780 98 Roofs, HSG B 2,820 79 <50% Grass cover, Poor, HSG B 6,600 90 Weighted Average 2,820 42.73% Pervious Area 3,780 57.27% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) Oft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Proposed Proposed Type 1124 -hr 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Prepared by BPA Printed 6/21/2017 HvdroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 15 Summary for Subcatchment 3S: Drainage to CB Runoff = 2.17 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.162 af, Depth> 6.69" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24 -hr 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Area (sf) CN Description 11,410 98 Paved parking, HSG B 1,220 98 Roofs, HSG B 12,630 98 Weighted Average 12,630 100.00% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) Oft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 4S: NE. Ex. Parking & Building & Conc. Runoff = 3.68 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.267 af, Depth= 6.45" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24 -hr 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Area (sf) CN Description 8,270 98 Paved parking, HSG B 12,115 96 Gravel surface, HSG B 1,272 79 <50% Grass cover, Poor, HSG B 21,657 96 Weighted Average 13,387 61.81 % Pervious Area 8,270 38.19% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Reach 2R: N. Ditch E of Driveway Inflow Area = 0.947 ac, 67.65% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 5.51" for 100 -Year event Inflow = 6.01 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.435 of Outflow = 6.01 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.435 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Proposed Proposed Type 1124 -hr 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Prepared by BPA Printed 6/21/2017 HvdroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 16 Summary for Pond 1 P: N. Culvert Inflow Area = 0.242 ac, 0.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.65" for 100 -Year event Inflow = 0.82 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 0.053 of Outflow = 0.82 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 0.053 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary = 0.82 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 0.053 of Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 961.88'@ 12.08 hrs Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 961.45' 15.0" Round RCP -Round 15" L= 41.0' RCP, end -section conforming to fill, Ke= 0.500 Inlet/ Outlet Invert= 961.45'/961.03' S=0.0102'/' Cc= 0.900 n=0.012 Concrete pipe, finished, Flow Area= 1.23 sf #2 Primary 962.20' 6.0' long x 6.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 Coef. (English) 2.37 2.51 2.70 2.68 2.68 2.67 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.66 2.66 2.67 2.69 2.72 2.76 2.83 Primary OutFlow Max=0.82 cfs @ 12.08 hrs HW=961.88' TW=0.00' (Dynamic Tailwater) 1=RCPRound 15" (Barrel Controls 0.82 cfs @ 3.30 fps) L2=Broa-d-Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Summary for Pond 3P: CB to N. Ditch Inflow Area = 0.290 ac,100.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 6.69" for 100 -Year event Inflow = 2.17 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.162 of Outflow = 2.17 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.162 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary = 2.17 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.162 of Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 960.55'@ 12.06 hrs Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 959.70' 15.0" Round Culvert L= 10.0' RCP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500 Inlet/ Outlet Invert= 959.70'/959.60' S=0.0100'/' Cc= 0.900 n=0.012 Concrete pipe, finished, Flow Area= 1.23 sf #2 Primary 962.30' 4.0' long x 0.5' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 Coef. (English) 2.80 2.92 3.08 3.30 3.32 Primary OutFlow Max=2.17 cfs @ 12.06 hrs HW=960.55' TW=0.00' (Dynamic Tailwater) �11=Culvert (Barrel Controls 2.17 cfs @ 3.45 fps) 2=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Proposed Proposed Type 1124 -hr 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Prepared by BPA Printed 6/21/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 17 Summary for Pond 4P: To E. of Site Inflow Area = 0.497 ac, 38.19% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 6.45" for 100 -Year event Inflow = 3.68 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.267 of Primary = 3.68 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.267 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs STORM SEWER DESIGN SHEET - RATIONAL METHOD Project Name: Chelsea Corner UPSTREAM Date: 6/21/2017 Actual UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM IE STIR. ID. Dia (in) Wall Lgth(ft) Grade I%) V(fps) Assumptions: Qcap(cfs) HGL HGL(%) HGL Thicknes (ft) CB 959.70 CSTG THICKNESS (IN) 959.60 APR 15 0.188 10 1.00% 5.3 6 MH DIA FL TO TOP OF PIPE RING THICKNESS (IN) 4 27 0.83 (CSTG+RING) 48" DIA COVER (IN) 6 48 1.33 (CSTG+RING+COVER) LARGE COVER THCK (IN) 8 54 1.50 (CSTG+RING+COVER) CATCH BASIN CALCULATIONS STRUCTURE D.S. Travel ID STRUCT DA(acre) tc(area) Time tc(cb) i -10yr C CA SUM(CA) Road Road MH DIA RIM MIN. RIM RE DIFF (min) (min) (min) (in/hr) ID Station ELEV ELEV. CB 0.38 15 15.0 4.9 0.90 0.342 0.34 — N/A 27 962.20 #N/A #N/A APR 0.0 PIPE CALCULATIONS UPSTREAM HYDRAULIC CALCULATIONS STIR. ID IE DOWNSTREAM CIR. Actual UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM IE STIR. ID. Dia (in) Wall Lgth(ft) Grade I%) V(fps) Q (cfs) Qcap(cfs) HGL HGL(%) HGL Thicknes (ft) CB 959.70 1.68 959.60 APR 15 0.188 10 1.00% 5.3 6.47 959.61 0.07% 959.60 3 Soil Map—Wright County, Minnesota N N m 4363W 436600 436900 437200 437500 437800 438100 438400 438700 45° 18' 4" N _.: 45° 17'1"N 436300 438600 436900 437200 4371500 437800 438100 438400 438700 3 Map Scale: 1:13,900 if printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5") sheet. Meters N 0 200 400 800 1200 diet 0 500 1000 2000 3000 Map projection: Web Mercator Comer coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: URI Zone 15N WGS84 G}DA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey 3 M M m 439000 45' 18' 4" N a iq ® 45° 171" N 439000 3 M 5/1/2017 Page 1 of 3 MAP LEGEND Area of Interest (AOI) Area of Interest (AOI) Soils Spoil Area Soil Map Unit Polygons im 0 Soil Map Unit Lines 0 Soil Map Unit Points Special Point Features Vo Blowout Water Features Borrow Pit Streams and Canals Clay Spot #_F4 Closed Depression r•,,r Gravel Pit Gravelly Spot Landfill Lava Flow Background Marsh or swamp + Mine or Quarry Miscellaneous Water Perennial Water M Rock Outcrop Saline Spot Sandy Spot Severely Eroded Spot Sinkhole Slide or Slip oa Sodic Spot Soil Map—Wright County, Minnesota MAP INFORMATION The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:12,000. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map measurements. Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL: Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857) Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required. This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Wright County, Minnesota Survey Area Data: Version 10, Sep 19, 2016 Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000 or larger. Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Mar 16, 2012—Apr 6, 2012 The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. UUP Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/1/2017 IiiiiiiiiiConservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 3 Spoil Area Stony Spot Very Stony Spot Wet Spot 4�, Other •� Special Line Features Water Features Streams and Canals Transportation #_F4 Rails r•,,r Interstate Highways US Routes Major Roads Local Roads Background ® Aerial Photography MAP INFORMATION The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:12,000. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map measurements. Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL: Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857) Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required. This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Wright County, Minnesota Survey Area Data: Version 10, Sep 19, 2016 Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000 or larger. Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Mar 16, 2012—Apr 6, 2012 The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. UUP Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/1/2017 IiiiiiiiiiConservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 3 Soil Map—Wright County, Minnesota Map Unit Legend usDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/1/2017 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3 Wright County, Minnesota (MN171) Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 260 Duelm loamy sand, 0 to 2 4.2 0.6% percent slopes 406 Dorset sandy loam, 0 to 2 571.7 76.3% percent slopes 441 Almora loam, 0 to 2 percent 10.2 1.4% slopes 1015 Udipsamments (cut and fill 8.2 1.1% land) 10876 Angus-Malardi complex, 2 to 6 0.0 0.0% percent slopes 1288 Seelyeville and Markey soils, 19.6 2.6% ponded, 0 to 1 percent slopes 13626 Angus loam, 2 to 6 percent 2.1 0.3% slopes 1368 Southhaven loam, 0 to 2 5.2 0.7% percent slopes 13776 Dorset -Two Inlets complex, 2 72.1 9.6% to 6 percent slopes 1377C Dorset -Two Inlets complex, 6 33.9 4.5% to 12 percent slopes 1377D Dorset -Two Inlets complex, 12 2.2 0.3% to 20 percent slopes 1377E Dorset -Two Inlets complex, 20 20.1 2.7% to 35 percent slopes Totals for Area of Interest 749.6 100.0% usDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/1/2017 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3 Map Unit Description: Dorset sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes ---Wright County, Minnesota Wright County, Minnesota 406—Dorset sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 2wOm2 Elevation: 660 to 1,710 feet Mean annual precipitation: 25 to 33 inches Mean annual air temperature: 37 to 48 degrees F Frost -free period: 120 to 170 days Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance Map Unit Composition Dorset and similar soils: 80 percent Minor components: 20 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Dorset Setting Landform: Flats Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf Down-slope shape: Linear Across -slope shape: Linear Parent material: Loamy glaciofluvial deposits over sandy and gravelly outwash Typical profile Ap - 0 to 11 inches: sandy loam Bt - 11 to 20 inches: sandy loam 2Bk - 20 to 38 inches: gravelly coarse sand 2C - 38 to 79 inches: gravelly coarse sand Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 2 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Somewhat excessively drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.60 to 2.00 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Calcium carbonate, maximum in profile: 15 percent Salinity, maximum in profile: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos/cm) Available water storage in profile: Low (about 5.0 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 3s Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3s Hydrologic Soil Group: B usDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/1/2017 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 2 Map Unit Description: Dorset sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes ---Wright County, Minnesota Other vegetative classification: Sloping Upland, Neutral (G091AN002MN) Hydric soil rating: No Minor Components Corliss Percent of map unit: 10 percent Landform: Flats Landform position (three-dimensional): Rise Down-slope shape: Linear Across -slope shape: Linear Other vegetative classification: Sandy (G091AN022MN) Hydric soil rating: No Oylen Percent of map unit: 5 percent Landform: Flats Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf Down-slope shape: Linear Across -slope shape: Linear Other vegetative classification (G091AN002MN) Hydric soil rating: No Forada Percent of map unit: 3 percent Landform: Swales Down-slope shape: Concave Across -slope shape: Linear Other vegetative classification: (G091AN003MN) Hydric soil rating: Yes Forada, occasionally ponded Percent of map unit: 2 percent Landform: Depressions Down-slope shape: Concave Across -slope shape: Concave Other vegetative classification: (G091AN003MN) Hydric soil rating: Yes Data Source Information Sloping Upland, Neutral Level Swale, Low AWC, Neutral Level Swale, Low AWC, Neutral Soil Survey Area: Wright County, Minnesota Survey Area Data: Version 10, Sep 19, 2016 usDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/1/2017 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — r~ I I I ,AREA 1 a I I I I I \I\y III I I AREA 2 I AREA 3� I III I I I I i \ I I ° •• - a• ,� o I � IIII �ic� X Z 0 20 0 20 U N W SCALE IN FEET SCALE: I" = 20' LEGEND. © Denotes electrical cabinet o ® Denotes electric service ® Denotes sanitary service Denotes sanitary manhole �Z ►1 Denotes watervalve Denotes sign N o N o0 14k> Denotes power pole Denotes guy wire \ o ❑T Denotes telephone pedestal 0 ® Denotes electric meter m o w 12 Denotes cable television box Z J F0 Denotes fiber optic service box 4i Y Z uc as Denotes under9 gas a W x 3 0 0 0 cx o ® Denotes mailbox Denotes soil boring - ® Denotes well - o _o?o N AC Denotes air conditioning voi �o © Denotes gas meter �•�, Z ► Denotes Flared End Section -�° EYw go --q Denotes culvert an c o A Denotes Wetland a ,°-, a, Z � Denotes Tree, Coniferous t o o w rn N •Anaat N Denotes Tree, Deciduous aT Denotes bituminous surface rn Ev'5 N Denotes concrete surface Z ti Denotes gravel surface 0 Denotes wood fence Z Denotes chainlink fence Q W — x x Denotes barbwire fence LU J Denotes stone wall d a uLL — — — — Denotes underground Telephone V mN Denotes overhead electric 0 zg wm — — — Dotes underground fiber optics (n > w — — • — Denenotes underground electric — — + — Denotes underground gas line a oma mn iWYY1 Denotes tree line fn -------- Denotes easement Denotes right of way Denotes major contour Denotes minor contour Denotes sanitary sewer Denotes storm sewer Denotes waterline — — — — Denotes existing adjoiners .. Denotes wetland Denotes open water z X 948.0 Proposed ground elevation F Q e�= Proposed Drainage Flow Q J - Proposed Silt Fence 0 Ld X800— Proposed Major Contour U) LLJ � � QProposed Minor Contour w Z Q Proposed Erosion Control Blanket Ld Q Proposed Bituminous Surface (n O Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 Proposed Rip Rop 0 Q LJ U Z LJ U Z J LLJ Z (n 5 = O X M U :2 LLJ XSHEET N0. 2 X 20 0 20 Z 0 SCALE IN FEET L U SCALE: I" = 20' o f / Gradina & Erosion Control Notes I. Contractor shall confine construction operations to the construction limits shown. - — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — N 2. All work shall conform to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's Storm Water w Permitrequirements. Contractor shall obtain NPDES permit and comply with all Permit requirements. 0 3. Contractor shall inspect the entire site at least every 7 days and within 24 hours of any measurable rainstorm. Damaged silt fence or other erosion control device �o or practices shall be repaired immediately. Inspection and maintenance of devices o:Z �l shall continue until the site has undergone final stabilization and a Notice of I Terminationis submitted to the MPCA. 0 n rn o rn 00 4. All grading operations shall be conducted in a manner to minimize the N L_ ♦/ L- I / I l/ / I L/ O I >10 potential for site erosion. 1 5. The site soil erosion and sediment control facilities shall be installed and �� > > > maintained to conform with the standards specified by the (MPCA). w o Z Z Y i Z >0961.912 096.446 Z. w I I > > > 6. Silt fences shall be installed prior the disturbance of any areas and maintained fn a w ca w 1 a w o x 3 96,-- 64i until all tributary disturbed areas are restored. o 0 o U o 1 / �/ 7. All Bolls tracked onto pavement or any other off-site areas shall be removed —� daily. RCP FES _0° 0 ' I 5 �g� — 0 -LF 12' RCP O 3.00% _ IE=9590 -5 e o O l — — _ — — — - _- -- — _ _ _ _ _ _ 8. The site sediment control facilities for the project must be installed prior to any site grading operation. Contact the Soil and Water °- c °� Conservation District (SWCD) once said facilities are installed and before any m Z° _— uz--=�au-- grading can take place. aTa o _ Z R E A` 'r I E `F'ry R° 9. The Contractor shall be responsible for the removal of all erosion control ° °°- ° z I ) sTo Mae measures, including silt fence and bales, upon establishment of permanent o a`o_ m o I 3 l� * h I RE 62.30 I vegetation in said areas. w a oN cn l I I_� I _ I IE= 59.30 g62.9 10. All ditches and areas disturbed during construction shall be restored and vegetated o s d o as soon as possible. Any finished areas shall be seeded and mulched within 14 days after finished grading is completed accordance to Mn/Dot 2575. ;; a2� o c U a ^I I $ II. Construction sediment shall be removed from ponds prior to final stabilization. - v r.21° 12. All disturbed areas shall be revegetated with seed mix, mulched, fertilized `o EN, 1 I &disk anchored. I 13. Backyard drainage swales shall be graded at a minimum I% slope. Z (� N S I 4n� I 52q 14. Inlet protection devices shall be placed in all storm drainage structures Q Z until vegetation is established on slopes. N� y III15• Riprap is to extend to the bottom of the pond. All riprap shall be granite. �e 16. All existing wells not used for irrigation purposes shall be abandoned. uJ I l 55 \\i \ II 1, i i 3e .2T 96360 g62' I \` W W �n e l AREA 2 T aQ FFE=ggS,g I \ PRFE%-'SILT STOP' FABRIC WOWM O Zd I S i�}u\� I i I STNS O 4' O.C. 10' MINIMUM li y >Z rnr M.r I BACKFlLL NwZ I l \ , • I I I EXISTING XR . 6''O FBOFABRII'C� L - i O .� ° FFE=964.30 NT PROPOSED �I• �3 EMBANKMENT uc ll_ s 14E) � SILT FENCE ROOF SLOPE i ROOF SLgPE (, I I II �5 1 ARTA 3E 1� �� , Mm F-- 5 �� 4 l 5�— II I 1 / AREA I / o TEMPORARY WASHED ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE (NTS) -J w I$ �' I I \ I \�l \ I SFFnINr; S;�I`ll IIF l IFAT,/ / o Seed mix 2b-121: 61 Ib/ac. LIJ 1' l / Fertilizer 22-5-10: 350 Ib/ac. Q w Z z l 5 I \ A / / - , e - . - y Mulch Type I: 2 T/ac. Q LLJ l / / I z LEGEND: Q X 94e.o Proposed ground elevation J l ' I I I I I ^ < ' <' ••' , o / / Proposed Drainage Flow (� Q w W .'. • . '. , , • , I Proposed Silt Fence Z LJ Q Q l tl II l i I I i 4 ` 4 4+ -�3 / —800— Proposed Motor Contour w z ,�BQO— Proposed Minor ContourIT m IT 1 I I 51.6 --� I I 6 / Proposed Erosion Control Blanket ' I l l l5,4 I I 4j ( SHEET N0. ' I l 5 '� I I I I / I I . • d . ' , • , 4 Proposed Bituminous Surface IV, I ° to i I ° o000000000o Proposed Rip Rap I � J I �� III I '1 \ I I ^ • • 34.5 II o I / WSB Building a legacy — your legacy. July 19, 2017 Ms. Angela Schumann Community Development Director City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1 Monticello, MN 55362 Re: Red Rooster Properties, Inc Civil Plan Review City Project No. 2017-017 WSB Project No. 010148-000 Dear Ms. Schumann: 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763-541-4800 Fax: 763-541-1700 We have reviewed the revised preliminary plat and civil plans, dated June 23, 2017, and the final plat submitted on July 14, 2017, as prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates offer the following comments. Preliminary Plat 1. The applicant has indicated that existing telephone lines are outside of the drainage and utility easements. If these telephone lines serve multiple properties, than additional easement width shall be provided to fully contain the line in the easement or an agreement with the telephone company allowing these lines on private property. It appears that only service lines to the buildings are outside of the easement. The applicant shall confirm this. 2. The first sentence on Note 5 on the preliminary plat should be revised to state "Existing sanitary line and water line are shown approximately per City as-builts and field markings completed by the City." Final Plat 3. The applicant shall confirm that the drainage and utility easement along Chelsea Road shall be 12 -feet wide and not 10 -feet wide per the original Oakwood Industrial Park plat. Site Plan 4. Provide a legend on Sheet 2/8- for the overall site plan. Equal Opportunity Employer wsbeng.com K:\010148-000\Admin\Docs\LTR-a-schumann-RedRooster 071917.docx July 19, 2017 Page 2 Utilitv and Removal Plan 5. Label the existing water main service to the existing building as 6" DIP. 6. The wet tap for the water service for Lot 2 shall be located south of the existing gate valve on the building side. 7. A note should be added to the plan indicating that the new 1" water service should be silver soldered. Other 8. The cross access and maintenance agreement received on July 10, 2017 shall be revised to indicate that the Lot 1 and 2 will maintain the existing 6 -inch and 1 -inch water service serving the lots from the mainline in Chelsea Road to the buildings. This service line will not owned or maintained by the City. The agreement still needs to be reviewed by the City attorney. 9. A preconstruction meeting will be held prior to building permit and excavation permit issuance. Please have the applicant provide a written response addressing the comments above. Please give me a call at 763-271-3236 if you have any questions or comments regarding this letter. Thank you. Sincerely, WSB & Associates, Inc. /AA" - i. &ssOt_ Shibani K. Bisson, PE City Engineer cc: Steve Grittman, NAC skb K:\010148-000\Admin\Docs\LTR-a-schumann-RedRoos[er 071917.docx Bogart, Pederson & Associates, Inc. LAND SURVEYING CIVIL ENGINEERING MAPPING MEMORANDUM To: Angela Schumann - City of Monticello Shibani Bisson, PE — WSB & Associates, Inc. (City Engineer) From: Jeff Swanson, PE - Bogart, Pederson & Associates, Inc. Date: 6/23/2017 Subject: Response to Site Plan Review Comments for Chelsea Corner Thank you for the site plan review comments dated 5/31/2017 for the PUD by Tom Holthaus located on Chelsea Road. The following are items that Bogart, Pederson & Assoc. addressed: Preliminary Plat Item No. 1: Added note 4 Item No. 2: Added D&U callouts and note 6 Item No. 3: Added linework and note 5 Site Plan Item No. 4: Added overall site plan (Sheet 2) Item No. 5: Rear entrances along the west side of the proposed building are not for public access. The rear entrances will be behind the fence and gate. Item No. 6: ADA compliance requirement is indicated by note 4 on the site plan (Sheet 3) and with grade requirements by the spot elevations on the grading plan (Sheet 4) Item No. 7: Labeled Chelsea Road ROW and D&U easements Grading and Erosion Control Plan Item No. 8: Existing contours are displayed as shaded linetype on plan Item No. 9: Labeled bituminous grades Item No. 10: Added spot elevations Item No. 11: Provided rational method calculation for catch basin in the Drainage Calculation report dated 6/21/2017 Item No. 12: Curb at catch basin lowered to achieve 1.5 foot separation to the finished floor and labeled EOF Item No. 13: Revised to 15 inch RCP storm pipe Item No. 14: Acknowledged Item No. 15: Acknowledged Main Office: Becker Phone: 7631262-8822 13076 First Street Toll free: 8881210-8301 Becker. MN 55308 Fax: 7631262-8844 Utility and Removal Plan Item No. 16: Added existing sanitary and water information Item No. 17: Curb stop to remain east of existing driveway as copper will be welded (see item 19) so as to avoid impact of existing drive entrance Item No. 18: Added to callout Item No. 19: Copper will be welded together to avoid being in the driveway Item No. 20: Owner to provide exhibit Item No. 21: Contractor to provide cones, barricades, and signs for both directions for partial lane shift during service connection to existing manhole and added note 14 to plan Item No. 22: Added callout to plan Item No. 23: Added note 15 to plan Item No. 24: Acknowledged Details Item No. 25: Revised details Stormwater Management Item No. 26: Revised Hardcover Calculation Table Item No. 27 Added grading limit area to grading plan (Sheet 4) Other Item No. 28: Acknowledged These items were addressed from my understanding of the comments. If these differ from the suggestions intended, please contact me at 763-262-8822 so I can incorporate the corrected information into the next plan submittal. WSB Building a legacy — your legacy. May 31, 2017 Ms. Angela Schumann Community Development Director City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1 Monticello, MN 55362 Re: Red Rooster Properties, Inc Site Plan Review City Project No. 2017-017 WSB Project No. 010148 Dear Ms. Schumann: 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763-541-4800 Fax: 763-541-1700 We have reviewed the preliminary plat dated May 8, 2017 and civil plans, dated May 8, 2017, as prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates offer the following comments. Preliminary Plat 1. Confirm that a recent topographic survey was completed for the site and provide the certificate of survey. 2. Denote the proposed drainage and utility easements more clearly. Confirm that the easements fully contain the public and private mainline utility lines that extend along Chelsea Road and Edmonson Avenue. 3. Show the existing sanitary sewer and watermain including service lines to the site on the preliminary plat or certificate of survey. Site Plan 4. Provide an overall site plan of the entire existing platted property including showing the proposed improvements. 5. Sidewalk shall extend along the doorway on the west side of the proposed building. 6. All sidewalk shall comply with ADA standards. 7. Label the Chelsea Road right of way and proposed drainage and utility easements. Equal Opportunity Employer wsbeng.com K:\010148-000\Admin\Docs\LTR-a-schumann-RedRooster 053117.docx May 31, 2017 Page 2 Grading and Erosion Control Plan 8. Show existing onsite and off-site contours to accurately depict drainage patterns. 9. Label percent grades for the parking lot. 10. Provide additional spot elevations where the parking area will match into the existing pavement to fully depict the drainage patterns. 11. Provide drainage calculations for the proposed storm sewer. 12. Identify all emergency overflow routes and elevations for he proposed parking lot catch basin on the grading plan. The EOF should be a minimum of 1.5' below the low building opening. 13. The minimum storm sewer pipe size shall be 15 -inch per City Design Manual. 14. Further review of the site grading will be completed with the lot survey and building permit submittal. 15. Grading, drainage and erosion control shall comply with City's zoning ordinance. See Chapter 4, section 4.10 related to grading, drainage, stormwater management and erosion control and the City's Design Manual- updated May 2017 located on the City's website - Engineering department. Utilitv and Removal Plan 16. Show the existing sanitary and water mainlines including labeling material type and size along Chelsea Road. Show the existing sanitary sewer and watermain services and gate valves, including labeling material type and size, to the existing building. 17. Move the proposed curb stop to the property corner between Lot 1 and Lot 2. It will be located in the driveway. 18. Identify if the water service is to be directional bored or open cut. 19. Provide details on how the copper to copper connection will be installed for the proposed 1 -inch water service. 20. The applicant shall provide documentation demonstrating how the property owners for Lot 1 and 2 will maintain the 1 -inch water service serving the lots from the mainline in Chelsea Road to the buildings. This service line will not owned or maintained by the City. 21. Identify traffic control measures needed for directional boring the sanitary sewer services. K:\010148-000\Admin\Docs\LTR-a-schumann-RedRoos[er 053117.docx May 31, 2017 Page 3 22. Identify a water -tight booted connection shall be installed at the manhole. 23. A utility excavation permit must be obtained from the Public Works department prior to commencement of utility connections. 24. Provide an as -built utility plan once construction is complete. Details 25. Detail plates shall be updated per the City's April 2017 General Specifications and Standard Detail Plates for Street and Utility Construction located on the City's website - Engineering department. Stormwater Management 26. Confirm that the proposed site improvement does not create 1 acre or more of new impervious surface, thus volume reduction is not required. Describe the impervious areas denoted on the Landscaping Plan include as it identifies more than one acre of impervious surface. 27. If 1 acre or more of the site is being disturbed, a NPDES/SDS Construction Storm Water General Permit and SWPPP shall be provided prior to construction commencing. Please confirm the site disturbance area. Other 28. The applicant shall be informed that the City is considering reconstructing Chelsea Road and adding sidewalk along the proposed property in 2018. An assessment for these improvements will be levied to the property following state statue requirements. Please have the applicant provide a written response addressing the comments above. Please give me a call at 763-271-3236 if you have any questions or comments regarding this letter. Thank you. Sincerely, WSB & Associates, Inc. / t, 45jssL_ Shibani K. Bisson, PE City Engineer cc: Steve Grittman, NAC skb K:\010148-000\Admin\Docs\LTR-a-schumann-RedRoos[er 053117.docx May 31, 2017 Page 4 K:\010148-000\Admin\Docs\LTR-a-schumann-RedRoos[er 053117.docx City Council Agenda — 7/24/17 4B. Consideration of a request for Comprehensive Plan Amendment reguiding Outlot C, Otter Creek Crossing from `Places to Shop' to `Places to Work' and a request to approve Ordinance No. 669 for amendment to the Official Monticello Zoning Map for Rezoning the subiect parcel from a B-4 (Regional Business) District to a I-1 (Light Industrial) District. Applicant: Jim Bowers/JX Bowers LLC; Applicant John Chadwick/John Chadwick Farms, LLC has withdrawn his application. (NAC) Property: Planning Case Number: Outlot C, Otter Creek Crossing 155-171-000030 Lengthy Legals for Parcel 2017-013 A. REFERENCE & BACKGROUND Request(s): Amend Land Use Designation from "Places to Shop" to "Places to Work"; Rezone a parcel of property from 13- 4 (Regional Business) to I-1 (Light Industrial). The original applications were submitted by two separate property owners for their respective adjacent separate parcels, Outlots C & D of Otter Creek Crossing. Applicant John Chadwick/John Chadwick Farms, LLC has withdrawn his application for comprehensive plan amendment and rezoning for parcel 155-171-000040 at this time. As such, the application requests at this time are only for parcel 155-171-000030 as legally described. The Bowers parcel is the further parcel to the northwest as shown in the aerial image attached. Deadline for Decision: June 11 th, 2017, extended to August 10, 2017 Land Use Designation: Places to Shop Zoning Designation: B-4 (Regional Business) District The purpose of the "B-4" regional business district is to provide for the establishment of commercial and service activities which draw from and serve customers from the entire community or region. Overlays/Environmental Regulations Applicable: Freeway Bonus Sign District City Council Agenda — 7/24/17 Current Site Use: Vacant Lot Surrounding Land Uses: North: R-3 Medium Density Residential District; B-2 Limited Business District (across I-94) East: B-4 Regional Business District South: 1-1 Light Industrial District West: I-1 Light Industrial District Project Description: The applicant seeks to change the land use map for a single vacant parcel of land from "Places to Shop" to "Places to Work". In addition, the applicant wishes to rezone said parcel from B-4 Regional Business to I-1 Light Industrial. ANALYSIS Comprehensive Plan Amendment. As noted above, the applicant is seeking an amendment to the "Land Use Plan Map" which can be found in the Comprehensive Plan. Therefore, a Comprehensive Plan amendment is necessary. I-94 Interchange Studv. In 2016, the City undertook a land use analysis as a part of the ongoing I-94 Interchange Study. The study examines the possibility of an interchange at the County Road 39 overpass. This is along the northern boundary of the northwest parcel. It should be noted that the study suggests this area should be zoned commercial if an interchange is constructed. However, as noted in the applicant's narrative, the City already has an abundance of vacant commercial zoning while industrial options are limited. In addition, the interchange study did not contemplate in depth the re -guiding of existing land uses within City boundaries. In support of the redesignation, the Comprehensive Plan identifies the northwest side of the City as needing to expand on existing "Places to Work". The Economic Development portion of the Plan promotes emphasis on this land use category, and the land use plan supports additional industrial growth in the northwest region. As noted above, the I-94 Interchange Study supports these strategies by identifying industrial land uses as a component of the land use mix for the area. While the "Places to Work" category is an important element in the City's growth and development, the Comprehensive Plan's Economic Development chapter focuses on tax base and job creation as the most important factors in seeking new industrial growth. At the same time, City staff reports an increase in industrial development interest that includes a component of outdoor storage. Outdoor storage, while it supports the principal business activity, does not create tax base or employment. Finding a balance point to promote industrial development is an element of the analysis in this case. 2 City Council Agenda — 7/24/17 The Zoning ordinance identifies the following factors for considering proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments: (a) Whether the proposed amendment corrects an error or addresses the need resulting from some changing condition, trend, or fact arising since the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan; (b) Whether the proposed amendment is consistent with the guiding principles of the Comprehensive Plan; (c) The extent to which the proposed amendment addresses a demonstrated community need; (d) Whether the proposed amendment will protect the health, safety, morals, and general welfare of the public; (e) The impacts on the natural and built environments, including air, water, noise, stormwater management, wildlife habitat, water quality, vegetation, drainage, streets, and other engineering design or environmental factors; (f) Whether the proposed amendment is compatible with existing and proposed uses surrounding the subject property; whether the proposed design and land uses are appropriate for the land; and whether the proposed amendment will maintain or improve compatibility among uses and ensure efficient development within the City; (g) Whether the proposed amendment will result in a logical, orderly and predictable development pattern; and (h) Whether the proposed amendment is consistent with the purpose of this ordinance. Most of these factors are present in considering the proposed land use plan amendment, including changes in the needs and demands for industrial land. Designating the map for "Places to Work" as requested, and considering a rezoning of the property from B-4 to an industrial designation would support the City's economic development objectives for tax base and job creation. As such, the applicant's request appears to be consistent with the direction and policies of the current expectations of the Comprehensive Plan. It is conceivable that if an interchange is eventually planned at County 39, circumstances may suggest zoning which would allow for more commercial land uses nearest to the interchange location. 3 City Council Agenda — 7/24/17 Zoning. The subject parcel is zoned B-4 (Regional Business) District. The applicant is seeking to rezone the property to I-1 (Light Industrial) to be consistent with property across Chelsea Rd. W. However, City staff recognizes that the parcel is located along I-94, which offers significant exposure to passing traffic, and the area serves as a western gateway to the community. In addition, the parcel also fronts Chelsea Road, a major collector route for the city. The parcel therefore is considered double -fronting and highly visible from both I-94 and Chelsea Road. In considering the appropriate zoning for the property, it is noted that a change to I-1 would allow for outdoor storage, while a change to IBC would accommodate many of the same light industrial uses, but would limit outdoor storage. IBC allows light industrial, offices, and other business type uses. Also as noted above, the potential issue of a freeway interchange at the County 39 location could impact the long-term land use demands on this site. In this regard, staff has examined the potential for both I-1 and IBC zoning designations for the subject parcel. Industrial District Covenants. In regard to consistency with the parcels across Chelsea Road, within the City -owned industrial park, it is important to note that private covenants apply to the City -owned park. The purpose of the covenants was to ensure that the district would be developed with higher standards for buildings, site improvements (such as landscaping), and restrict outdoor storage activities. While these covenants would not apply to the property subject to the rezoning, it is important to understand how the adjoining lands have developed to now, and are expected to further develop into the future. Thus, while the general designation is for "Places to Work", and the zoning designation is I-1, there is a higher level of development standards applied to the City -owned industrial area. Uses. The IBC zoning accommodates both a mix of light industrial and commercial uses, which provides for a transition between this subject parcel and that of the parcels to the southeast, which are zoned B-4. The I-1 District allows primarily for a base of light industrial uses. Lot Area and Width. The following table shows that the parcels will be conforming with the I-1 District standards as well as the IBC District standards. It should be noted that the table below represents an analysis of the parcels in their current configuration. Any future subdivision of the parcels would require platting, at which time the lot area, widths and setbacks would again be evaluated. Lot Area and Width Rezone to I-1 Light Industrial Parcel Lot Area Required Compliant Lot Width Required Compliant Southeast 831,399 ft. 20,000 sq. ft. Yes 1,700 ft. 100 ft. Yes Northwest 831,393 ft. 20,000 sq. ft. Yes 900 ft. 100 ft. Yes Rezone to IBC Industrial Business Campus Parcel Lot Area I Required I Compliant I Lot Width Required � Compliant M City Council Agenda — 7/24/17 Southeast 831,399 ft. 8,000 sq. ft. Yes 1,700 ft. 100 ft. Yes Northwest 831,393 ft. 8,000 sq. ft. Yes 900 ft. 100 ft. Yes The two subject parcels will be compliant with the City's requirements for lot size and width in the I-1 District as well as the IBC. Setbacks. The following table shows the setback requirements for the B-4, I-1, and IBC districts: Setback Comparison From the table above, the property's current zoning is the least restrictive of the three in terms of setback. The applicant should be aware that any rezoning will result in more restrictive setback requirements. It is noted that the IBC District imposes a greater setback requirement than does the I-1 District. However, the parcels are of adequate size to accommodate development under either district, so setbacks need not factor into the City's decision. Overlav District. The area is within the Freeway Bonus Sign District. This district allows for additional signage along I-94. The rezone would not exempt the parcels from this district. It should be noted that the area is also adjacent to the Special Use Overlay District. The City may wish to consider impacts of these overlay districts on development of the subject property as separate actions. Planning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission reviewed the requests and held a public hearing on the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning applications on May 2nd, 2017. It is noted that the Commission's review included both Outlots C & D. The Planning Commission heard public comment from one of the applicants and property owner John Chadwick, and his representative Wayne Elam, regarding the request for comprehensive plan amendment and to rezone the subject parcels to I-1. Mr. Elam expressed that the applicants would prefer I-1 zoning designation, as it would provide for the ability to use the property for outdoor storage, versus the IBC recommendation of staff, which would limit that ability. No other public was present to address the Commission on the matter. 5 B-4 Regional I-1 Light Industrial IBC Industrial Business District District Business Campus Front 0 feet 30 feet 50 feet Side (Interior) 0 feet 15 feet 30 feet Side (Street) 0 feet 30 feet 50 feet Rear 0 feet 15 feet 40 feet From the table above, the property's current zoning is the least restrictive of the three in terms of setback. The applicant should be aware that any rezoning will result in more restrictive setback requirements. It is noted that the IBC District imposes a greater setback requirement than does the I-1 District. However, the parcels are of adequate size to accommodate development under either district, so setbacks need not factor into the City's decision. Overlav District. The area is within the Freeway Bonus Sign District. This district allows for additional signage along I-94. The rezone would not exempt the parcels from this district. It should be noted that the area is also adjacent to the Special Use Overlay District. The City may wish to consider impacts of these overlay districts on development of the subject property as separate actions. Planning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission reviewed the requests and held a public hearing on the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning applications on May 2nd, 2017. It is noted that the Commission's review included both Outlots C & D. The Planning Commission heard public comment from one of the applicants and property owner John Chadwick, and his representative Wayne Elam, regarding the request for comprehensive plan amendment and to rezone the subject parcels to I-1. Mr. Elam expressed that the applicants would prefer I-1 zoning designation, as it would provide for the ability to use the property for outdoor storage, versus the IBC recommendation of staff, which would limit that ability. No other public was present to address the Commission on the matter. 5 City Council Agenda — 7/24/17 The Planning Commission discussed the site and potential uses of the property under either the IBC or I-1 zoning designations. After discussion, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended to approve the Comprehensive Plan amendment reguiding the subject parcels to "Places to Work" and recommended rezoning the site to IBC (Industrial and Business Campus), citing the property's visible location along Chelsea Road and I-94 as a basis for their recommendation, in addition to those findings in the resolution PC -2017-008. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS Decision 1: Comprehensive Plan Amendment (requires a supermajority vote of the City Council to approve) The Planning Commission recommends Alternative #1 below. Motion to adopt Resolution 2017 - XX to approve a Comprehensive Plan amendment reguiding the subject parcel to "Places to Work", based on findings in said resolution. 2. Motion to deny adoption of Resolution 2017 - XX to approve a Comprehensive Plan amendment reguiding the subject parcel to "Places to Work", based on findings to be made by the City Council. 3. Motion of other. Decision 2: Rezoning Request The Planning Commission recommends Alternative #1 below. Motion to adopt Ordinance No. 669 for rezoning of the subject parcel from 13- 4 (Regional Business) District to IBC (Light Industrial Business) as recommended by staff and based on findings of the Planning Commission per resolution 2017 -PC -008. 2. Motion to adopt Ordinance No. 669 for rezoning of the subject parcel from 13- 4 (Regional Business) District to I-1 (Light Industrial District) as proposed in the application of April 1, 2017, based on findings to be made by the City Council. 3. Motion to deny adoption of Resolution PC- 2017-008 for rezoning from B-4 Regional Business District, based on findings to be made by the City Council. 4. Motion of other. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION no City Council Agenda — 7/24/17 An amendment of the Comprehensive Plan requires consideration of the general goals and policies of the City for long-term land use, and how the proposed amendment would further those goals. In this case, it is noted that the City has a large inventory of undeveloped commercial property in the Highway 25 corridor, and the Comprehensive Plan recommends the inclusion of more industrial land uses toward the northwest. Commercial uses are better accommodated in concentrations along major accessible corridors, as well as in proximity to freeway interchanges. At the current time, there is not immediate freeway interchange near the subject property, although the City is engaged in a series of studies (currently focusing on Highway 25) to determine the possible location or locations for future interchange locations. As this determination is quite some time into the future, the industrial designation for the area appears to be appropriate. With regard to the specific industrial zoning district, the staff report notes that the high level of exposure to the freeway, as well as the covenant -enforced requirements on the adjoining industrial park to the southwest suggest that the IBC District would be more appropriate for the site than the I-1. Particularly given the restrictions on outdoor storage and allowance for certain commercial uses, the IBC District would better reflect the future development of the site in question. As such, staff recommends Alternative #1, approval of the Comprehensive Plan amendment, and a rezoning to the IBC, Industrial Business Campus District. D. SUPPORTING DATA A. Resolution 2017-43 B. Ordinance No. 669 C. Resolution PC -2017-008 D. Planning Commission Minutes, May 2nd, 2017 E. Aerial Site Image F. Applicant Narrative G. Excerpt, Monticello Comprehensive Plan: a. Land Use Map b. Economic Development H. Commercial Land Inventory Map I. Industrial Land Inventory Map J. Excerpt, Monticello Zoning Ordinance a. IBC (Industrial Business Campus) b. I-1 (Light Industrial) c. Use Table K. Excerpt, Monticello Interchange Study a. Concept Maps L. Monticello Zoning Map M. Letter of Withdrawal, John Chadwick 7 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2017-43 APPROVING A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT REDESIGNATING FROM "PLACES TO SHOP" TO "PLACES TO WORK" FOR OUTLOT C, PID 155-171-000030, OTTER CREEK CROSSING WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted a request to reguide the subject property, identified as parcel 155-171-000030, Outlot C, Otter Creek Crossing and legally described in the attached "Exhibit A", resulting in a change from business-related land uses to industrial -related land uses; and 41 WHEREAS, the applicant concurrently proposes to market the property for industrial users; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendment 1 consistent wi the long- use and development of the property suggested by the Comprehensivean; and WHEREAS, the City has experienced a need for additional industrial land through development inquiries; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hea n May 2, 2017 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were prove ed the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and � WHEREAS, the City Counci has considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission, all of the comments of the hearing, and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolu n; and 7 WHEREAS, the C111 Council of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of oproval: 1. The land use plan amendment is an appropriate means of furthering the intent of the Comprehensive Plan for the site. 2. The use of the site for industrial development is consistent with the City's economic development objectives. 3. The amendment results in a land use designation that more closely achieves the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan than would the current regulations. 4. The amendment results in the potential for development that would be compatible and consistent with the existing surrounding land uses in the area. 6. The resulting land uses will have impacts on public services, including sewer, water, stormwater treatment, and traffic which have been planned to serve the property for the subject property as proposed. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA: The Monticello City Council approves the Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan redesignating the subject property as legally described in "Exhibit A" from "Places to Shop" to "Places to Work". ADOPTED BY the City Council of Monticello, Minnesota this 24th day of July, 2017. ATTEST: Jeff O CITY OF MONTICELLO Stumpf, Mayor EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT PARCEL Outlot C, OTTER CREEK CROSSING, according to the recorded plat thereof, Wright County, Minnesota. ►1P That part of Outlot D, OTTER CREEK CROSSING, according to the recorded plat thereof, Wright County, Minnesota, lying northwesterly of a line parallel with and distant 1689.64 feet northwesterly of, as measured at right angles to the southeasterly line of said Outlot D. ORDINANCE NO. 669 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 10 OF THE MONTICELLO CITY CODE, KNOWN AS THE ZONING ORDINANCE, BY REZONING THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY FROM B-4, GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT TO IBC, INDUSTRIAL BUSINESS CAMPUS DISTRICT: OUTLOT C and a portion of OUTLOT D, PID 155-171-000030, OTTER CREEK CROSSING THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTIC#is REBY ORDAINS: Section 1. The zoning map of the City of Monticehereby amended to rezone the following described parcels from B-4, Regional Business to IBC, Industrial Business Campus District: PID NUMBERS: 155-171-000030 (See attached Legal Description) Section 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to mark the official zoning map to reflect this ordinance. The map shall not be republished at thi time. Section 3. The City Clerk is hereby directed to make the chan s required by this Ordinance as part of the Official Monticello City Code, Title 10, Zoning Ordinance, and to renumber the tables and chapters accordingly as necessary to provide the intended effect of this Ordinance. The City Clerk is further directed to make necessary corrections to any internal citations that result from said renumbering process, provided that such changes retain the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance as has been adopted. Section 5. is Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage and publication. The ordinance in its entirety and map shall be posted on the City website after publication. Copies of the complete Ordinance and map are available,nline and at Monticello City Hall for examination upon request. ADOPTED BY the Monticello City Council this 24th day of July, 2017. Brian Stumpf, Mayor ATTEST: Jeff O'Neill, Administrator AYES: NAYS: ORDINANCE NO. 669 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT PARCEL Outlot C, OTTER CREEK CROSSING, according to the recorded plat thereof, Wright County, Minnesota. That part of Outlot D, OTTER CREEK CROSSING, according to the recorded plat thereof, Wright County, Minnesota, lying northwesterly of a line parallel with and distant 1689.64 feet northwesterly of, as measured at right angles to the southeasterly line of said Outlot D. 2 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2017-008 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT REDESIGNATING THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM "PLACES TO SHOP" TO "PLACES TO WORK", AND REZONING THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM "B-4", REGIONAL BUSINESS TO "IBC", INDUSTRIAL BUSINESS CAMPUS" WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted a request to reguide and rezone subject property, identified as Outlot C & D, Otter Creek Crossing, resulting in a change from business-related land uses to industrial -related land uses; and WHEREAS, the applicant concurrently proposes to market the property for industrial users; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendments are consistent with the long-term use and development of the property suggested by the Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the City has experienced a need for additional industrial land through development inquiries; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on May 2, 2017 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: 1. The land use plan amendment and rezoning are an appropriate means of furthering the intent of the Comprehensive Plan for the site. 2. The use of the site for industrial development is consistent with the City's economic development objectives. 3. The amendments result in a land use designation that more closely achieves the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan than would the current regulations. 4. The amendments result in the potential for development that would be compatible and consistent with the existing surrounding land uses in the area. 6. The resulting land uses will have impacts on public services, including sewer, water, stormwater treatment, and traffic which have been planned to serve the property for the subject property as proposed. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2017-008 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, that the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the Monticello City Council approves the Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan, redesignating the subject property from "Places to Shop" to "Places to Work", and adopts Ordinance No. rezoning the subject property from B-4, Regional Business to IBC, Industrial Business Campus. ADOPTED this 2nd day of May, 2017, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION L'In ATTEST: Brad Fyle, Chair Angela Schumann, Community Development Director 2 MINUTES REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, May 2°d, 2017 - 6:00 p.m. Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center Special Joint Meeting Mississippi Room - 5:00 PM Concept Stage Planned Unit Development for Detached Townhome Lots Applicant: Carlisle Village, LLC Present: John Alstad, Brad Fyle, Sam Murdoff, Marc Simpson, Lucas Wynne Council Liaison: Charlotte Gabler Staff: Angela Schumann, Steve Grittman (NAC), John Rued 1. General Business A. Call to Order Chairman Brad Fyle called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. B. Consideration of aoDrovine minutes a. Special Meeting Minutes — April 01, 2017 MARC SIMPSON MOVED TO APPROVE THE SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES OF APRIL 4TH, 2017. MOTION SECONDED BY SAM MURDOFF SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED, 5-0. b. Regular Meeting Minutes — April 411, 2017 MARC SIMPSON MOVED TO APPROVE THE REGULAR MEETING MINUTES OF APRIL 4TH, 2017. MOTION SECONDED BY SAM MURDOFF SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED, 5-0. C. Citizen Comments None. D. Consideration of adding items to the agenda Marc Simpson asked to add an item at the end of agenda. 2. Public Hearings A. Public Hearing — Consideration of a reauest for Rezoning to Planned Unit Development, a request for Development Stage Planned Unit Development for Vehicle Sales and Rental, Auto Repair — Minor, and Accessory Office and Retail Uses in a B-3 (Hiehwav Business) District Applicant: FRHP Lincolnshire, LLC Brad Fyle announced that the applicant requested tabling action. Brad Fyle opened the public hearing. Hearing no comments, the public hearing was closed. SAM MURDOFF MOVED TO TABLE ACTION TO THE JUNE 6TH, 2017 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. MARC SIMPSON SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED, 5-0. B. Public Hearing — Consideration of a reauest for Comprehensive Plan Amendment for `Places to Shop' to `Places to Work' and a reauest for Rezoning from a B-4 (Regional Business) District to a I-1 (Light Industriall) District Applicant: Jim Bowers and John Chadwick Steve Grittman stated two parcels were included in the land use application request. The properties are referred to as the Bowers/Chadwick parcels and lie between I-94 and Chelsea Road. It is west of Moon Motorsports and adjacent to the City's industrial development park. Grittman noted that the area was previously rezoned from industrial to commercial due to the economy at the time. Since commercial development has not occurred, the applicants sought to re - guide the property from "Places to Shop" to "Places to Work" and rezone from B- 4 (Regional Business) District to I-1 (Light Industrial). Grittman explained that requests for re -guiding and rezoning, the City examines a number of factors that support the change. Surrounding land use patterns, adequate utilities and roadways, and City policies for Economic Development were all mentioned. The City notes that there is becoming a tighter demand for industrial land and they have been receiving inquiries routinely. Grittman noted that the request would be consistent with the industrial land designations located to the south and west of the parcels. Chelsea Road is a major collector road and is able to accommodate large amounts of traffic. At the current time the land use is compatible with the area, but the City is also working on an interchange land study. Grittman explained that the plan is looking at the intersection of County Road 39 and I-94, which could have implications for development of the Bowers/Chadwick's parcels. Staff believes that the industrial designation would be compatible, but a possible interchange at County Road 39 and I-94 could cause commercial development pressure directly at the interchange location. Staff noted concerns with outdoor storage that would be visible from the freeway that would be allowed under the I-1 District zoning request. Staff therefore recommended rezoning the parcels to IBC (Industrial and Business Campus) District. Grittman noted that the setbacks and uses were similar with the two industrial districts, but outdoor storage would be restricted and site and building design requirements also vary between the two. City staff felt that a visual transition from the freeway to the west and south industrial would be complimentary by having the parcels rezoned to IBC, as the City's industrial park has in place covenants which restrict outdoor storage and require a higher design 2 standard. Staff recommended re -guiding the parcels from "Places to Shop" to "Places to Work" and rezoning to IBC. Brad Fyle asked if the property abuts the freeway right-of-way line. Grittman confirmed and stated there was not a designated easement along the freeway other than the standard drainage and utility easement. Charlotte Gabler commented that she believed either industrial zoning designation would match the area. Marc Simpson asked if the main difference between the IBC and the I-1 District was outdoor storage. Grittman confirmed, stating additional requirements would also apply for building materials and site plan. He also mentioned that the IBC allows a few business related uses such as office and hospitality uses. Sam Murdoff asked if there was an idea of when a possible interchange would be constructed. Grittman stated that until work has been completed on Highway 25 planning, the work on west interchange planning has been put on hold. Marc Simpson asked what the red dotted line around the parcels meant. Grittman stated that the parcels were located in the Special Use Overlay District. Fyle opened the public hearing and invited the applicant to speak first. Wayne Elam, Commercial Realty Solutions, explained that each parcel is 19 acres. He provided history of the reason for the request and stated that he sat in on an EDA Meeting, where Jim Thares noted the City was running short on industrial land. There were requests out there from industrial developers looking for 5 to 20 acres of land and with current industrial needs could not be met with Otter Creek. Following the meeting, Elam met with John Chadwick and Jim Bowers to discuss the City's need for more industrial land. Elam recommended that they request rezoning from business to industrial. Elam echoed concerns industrial developers have with the shape of the lots in Otter Creek Industrial Park and said that rectangle shaped lots were most cost effective for industrial development. Elam stated the City has 317 acres of commercially zoned land with 80 acres of commercial land on the interstate. He expected the commercial development to occur mostly south of Highway 25 or near Mills Fleet Farm. Elam also indicated that they are requesting I-1 and noted some of the differences with the I-1 and IBC Districts. He stated that he didn't feel this location would be good for a hotel. He expressed concerns with precluding outdoor storage. He reiterated the importance of the I-1 designation and offered a better screening requirement as a tradeoff. John Chadwick, 4477 Manitou Lane, Excelsior, explained the history of the parcels. Chadwick mentioned the benefits of the rezoning that would occur with industrial development especially because of the location of the lift -station. Chadwick expressed that the IBC was not consistent in the area, and that I-1 is located adjacent to the property. Gabler stated the City and IEDC are working on increasing the size of the industrial park or land availability. Wayne Elam stated there is currently IBC land located in the City, with 13 vacant, acres east of the Monticello Workforce Center and 7.5 acres in between Mills Fleet Farm and UMC. He noted that there has not been any development on IBC land. Angela Schumann responded that when the City recodified the Zoning Ordinance, the previously distinguished I -A District was removed, while the IBC was added. Land that was designated I -A was either zoned to IBC or I-1. Schumann confirmed that there has been no construction on the IBC districts. Brad Fyle commented that he didn't want to recommend approval of a rezoning if the owner didn't want it rezoned. Elam stated that he was speaking on behalf of the owners and that they wanted to rezone away from commercial to industrial, either IBC or I-1. Elam reiterated the importance of rezoning to I-1. Gabler asked if a future applicant could apply for a PUD for the parcels and request outdoor storage. Schumann confirmed and added that under the I-1, outdoor storage could be as large as the principal building. She noted that staff are currently working on a revised set of standards for screening and outdoor storage that would come forward at a future meeting. Schumann stated that staff recommend staying with the IBC District because of the restrictions on outdoor storage due to the visbilityof the double fronting lots. Fyle expressed he was leaning towards rezoning to IBC because of visibility. Elam added that with the changes that were soon to be proposed for outdoor storage and screening, he suggested increasing the height of screening. Murdoff asked for examples of outdoor storage that could be seen in this area. Grittinan responded that it depended on the development. Lucas Wynne stated that the decision is based on the desire for how Monticello wants to present itself in the future. Wynne expressed desire for a stricter set of zoning standards due to visibility, but also had concerns with restricting the type of industrial development. Elam noted that if the City rezoned the area to IBC that they also needed to look where they would put additional I-1. 11 Murdoff agreed that there was a need for I-1 with outdoor storage, but wasn't sure if those parcels were the right area. He expressed that a rezoning could possibly be a disservice as there currently is no development plans for the area. Schumann noted that the City is very aware of the need for industrial land. She expressed that the City has a Comprehensive Plan which guides areas for places to work. Schumann than talked about outdoor storage, stating that it didn't have to do strictly with the site appearance, but rather the amount of jobs, wages, and tax base. She noted the importance of balancing outdoor storage with increasing jobs and tax base. MARC SIMPSON MOVED TO ADOPT RESOLUTION PC -2017 - 008 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT TO "PLACES TO WORK", AND ORDINANCE NO. 6XX FOR REZONING FROM B-4 (REGIONAL BUSINESS) DISTRICT TO IBC (INDUSTRIAL BUSINESS CAMPUS) DISTRICT AS PROPOSED BY CITY STAFF. BRAD FYLE SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED, 5-0. Schumann stated that the recommendation would be subject to a super -majority vote by the City Council on May 22nd. 3. Regular Agenda A. Consideration of the Communitv Develonnlent Directors Report Angela Schumann thanked Council Member Gabler for being on top of things at the legislature. Schumann noted the League of MN Cities resource information on legislature items such as interim ordinances was provided in the packet. Schumann also noted that on Thursday, May 4th the Small Area Study Steering Committee would be meeting. She expected that a plan would come before the commission in a June or July meeting. There would be a public open house at West Bridge Park. Information about educational sessions was also provided. 4. Added Items Marc Simpson asked Schumann if the Planning Commission could move to electronic agendas. Schumann responded saying that the City Council was trying them out first. She believed that the City Clerk stated within the next few years that the EDA and Planning Commission would also transfer over. 5. Adjournment MARC SIMPSON MOVED TO ADJOURN THE MEETING AT 7:07 P.M. SAM MURDOFF SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED, 5-0. Recorder: Jacob Thunander T7 Approved: May 2, 2017 5 Attest: Angela Scl� Development Director Bowers, Jim - Request for Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning Created by: City of Monticello PID 155-171-000030 1 Lengthy Legal Ahl AO► COMMERCIAL REALTY SOLUTIONS ww:.,.commrealiysolutions.com April 3, 2017 1 �CIEUVE D AP j 1017 RE: Zoning Change Application and Comprehensive Plan Amendment from B-4 to I-1. Properties: John Chadwick Farms, LLC XXXX Chelsea Road West, Monticello Otter Creek Crossing, 19.08 acres, Outlot D PID: 155-171-000040 JX Bowers, LLC XXXX Chelsea Road West, Monticello Otter Creek Crossing, 19.09 acres, Outlot C PID #155-171-000030 This is a joint application. Reason for Request: This property is between the City owned Otter Creek Industrial Park and I-94. There is a need for large acreage industrial parcels. This property is a logical solution for adding additional industrial land without incurring large infrastructure development costs. There is in excess of 300 acres of available property within the City of Monticello that is zoned Commercial, of which approximately 80 acres of that land is located on the interstate. It is a better use of the property for both the City and the Owners to rezone it to I-1 Industrial. 2 �' � f..� � :a�F� - ,�. �.•�t�, '�_"8t . _ � .. � ;I,(�,• •;fit .i. �"" . f. � _ ar: ,�+La„ .ta {..'' t - � " *.Y •i���;. � � fir{ - 1 �w'4+„ � A?��' }II�"a# V'�--ter .,. f , �,4' �; ,�' 7{ L JM.�- �' '` 'T�`M _.. "3•#ct��, � It I .' -. ".� � f � +� d ;�. �3•'�1,� �_ .� � ��4tVNES.:,�,�A.S 4„ +�• r�i�.�s� -- j �j LY Ln r 4 S fv. •,/��/• �w�y,� �f• •% rY ��•f } •..�A'' �� �•� � .rain ! .�� ( Y♦ I J_ _- •��r� ILwAY• •n NO�, �' 1G' � 1 ! �. �1.. ��� `j'. f _ • ►• �'}' � r . rL�fl {r 4� ��f(q,- '•"4 LO Ck EST � I • p `��p- '� : �a�c ,� �-,�'�e�a.,,`�`�rr` �" �• �� r..�r, l "�•1 � s � �``�'����•-,df � �,,+� ia+..rr ,ut�, �.�� y ��� 'r �, '�', � • I .ter-..' �•i/ ♦ i {j4`r'�f'i F A -C' Ln - - ts,. _ • . ,JJ f ��•^- z ; -'- / �► 1,� � .rte,.... `� • �`'' `` �� �• �. ": 'I {Y�,J Y moi. p�wt �•. -�� j'5����/ I .• w � y.. 3 _In. F T' � � ,yam ,� • � j 0 V, 1A p .i 1 p t LL 13 I • .. Via. -�._. � _� "' � •r �!W_C�F1.Y-�N�1R� Y.s:.l �_ '` \�:;t �+��'�� YR I1 V'JL'� Y �! Q � ( V FA ILA Birch Lake ° a North 106 e E' Lake 0 Cc 0 0.25 0.5 1 s Miles ► ° a Data Source: MnDNR, Sherburne County, Wright County, and WSB & Associates. June 9, 2014 Amended by City Council Resolution 2014-062, June 9, 2014 Legend Places to Live Lake Qr) + Places to Shop i Places to Work Places to Recreate - L 'p + Places for Community ?r Lake�) + Downtown Mixed Use o Interchange Planning Area a Urban Reserve Infrastructure 0 0� ^- Rivers and Streams iPublic Waters Inventory Wetlands (National & Public Waters Inventories) D root Potential Greenway Q J Potential Interchange ° Future Bridge *%a* Existing Arterial or Collector Road 1 'j*,* Proposed Arterial or Collector Road ^�� Powerline Monticello City Boundary Orderly Annexation Area c "' I I NE � 1�, o Land Use Plan Facilitating Redevelopment The Comprehensive Plan seeks to create a place where land use plans, policies, and controls work together with private investment to properly maintain all properties in Monticello. It is recognized that this approach may not succeed in all locations. Despite the best plans and intentions, properties may become physically deteriorated and/or economically inviable. In such places, city intervention may be need to facilitate redevelopment and prevent the spread of blight. This intervention may include: ► Acquisition of land. ► Preparation of sites for development. ► Construction or reconstruction of public improvements. ► Provision of adequate parking supply. ► Remediation of polluted land as needed. ► Removal of other physical and economic barriers to achieve community objectives. These actions may require the use of tax increment financing, tax abatement, or other finance tools available to the City. Development Strategies The following strategies will be used to implement the Comprehensive Plan in the area of Economic Development: 1. The City must use the Comprehensive Plan to provide adequate locations for future job - producing development (Places to Work). 2. The City should adhere to the Comprehensive Plan to encourage stable business setting and promote investment and expansion of facilities. 3. The City should coordinate utility planning and manage other development to ensure that expansion areas are capable of supporting new development in a timely manner. 4. The City will continue to work with existing businesses to maintain an excellent business environment, retain jobs, and facilitate expansions. 5. In addition to assisting business seeking to locate in Monticello, the City should actively target and market to businesses which will be a supplier, customer or collaborative partner to existing businesses within the community. 6. The City should target and market to businesses which would benefit from Monticello's utility and communications infrastructure. 7. The City will work with the CentraCare Health System to ensure the retention and to promote the expansion of health care services in Monticello. 8. The City will use the Comprehensive Plan to maintain and enhance the quality of life in Monticello as a tool for attracting businesses and jobs. 2008 Comprehensive Plan - Updated 2013 Economic Development 1 4-7 Ideally, the Comprehensive Plan does not have an Economic Development chapter. The Land Use Plan would be sufficient to channel market forces to meet the development objectives of the community. In reality, certain development needs cannot be met without public intervention. The Economic Development chapter of the Plan focuses on the aspects of Monticello's future that require particular attention and action by the City. These actions include: ► Attracting and retaining jobs ► Expanding the tax base ► Enhancing the economic vitality of Downtown ► Facilitating redevelopment Attracting and Retaining Jobs The creation and retention of jobs is one of the most important objectives for Monticello. Jobs, particularly jobs with income levels capable of supporting a family, are key to achieving many elements of Monticello's vision for the future. ► Jobs attract residents to the community. Jobs will pay a critical role in creating the type of "move up" housing sought by the City. ► Jobs provide the income needed to support local business and government services. ► Retention of businesses promote community stability by keeping jobs and residents in Monticello. The Community Context chapter of the Comprehensive Plan contains a section on Employment. This section contains data about employment in Monticello and of its residents. Among the key findings in this section are: ► While the community added nearly 5,000 people between 2000 and 2010 according to the U.S. Census, it only added 1,430 jobs according to the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW). In 2010, the community had 6,992 jobs according to the QCEW but 7,093 people in the labor force according to the Census. 2008 Comprehensive Plan — Updated 2013 Economic Development 1 4-1 ► The U.S. Census Bureau, Center for Economic Studies' OntheMap website shows that in 2010 4,597 people leave the community each day to work, while 3,849 people come into the community to work. Only 835 both live and work in the community. ► Approximately 15% of residents in 2010 are employed within the community. This has dropped from 18% in 2002. ► As shown in Figure 4.1, 2012 data from the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development (DEED) on their mnprospector.com website shows that Monticello is made up of a wide range of small to medium sized employers. Only 10 employers have more than 100 employees. Over half have fewer than four (4) employees. ► Workers for Monticello businesses come primarily from Monticello and the surrounding region. Nearly 75% of people working in Monticello live in Monticello, adjacent townships, or other places in Wright and Sherburne counties (2010 OntheMap). ► Nearly 40% of Monticello residents work in Hennepin County, with the largest percentage in Minneapolis, Plymouth, and Maple Grove. Another 15% work elsewhere in Wright County, including Buffalo and St. Michael. ► The 2007-2011 American Community Survey (ACS) Census reported a mean travel time to work of 28.5 minutes. This is up from the 2000 Census travel time of 24 minutes. The mean travel time in the 2007-2011 ACS was 29.7 minutes for Wright County and 24.5 minutes for the region overall. Figure 4-1:2012 Total Establishments by Size 1-4 Employees 254 52.05 5-9 Employees 97 19.88 10-19 Employees 64 13.11 20-49 Employees 42 8.61 50-99 Employees 21 4.30 100-249 Employees 7 1.43 250-499 Employees 2 0.41 500-999 Employees 1 0.20 Background Reports The City of Monticello conducts studies and assessments as needed to help guide its economic development efforts. The findings and recommendations of these studies are summarized below with the most recent provided first. 2010 Business Retention and Expansion Research (BR&E) Report Monticello's Business Retention and Expansion (BR&E) program was initiated by the City of Monticello, the Monticello Chamber of Commerce and Industry, DEED, and the University of Minnesota Extension. It was also sponsored by over a dozen local businesses. Through the BR&E program, 60 businesses were visited. Findings from the visits and data analysis found: ► 78% of the visited businesses were locally owned and operated. ► 20% of businesses were in manufacturing, 18% in retail trade, and 13% in other services. ► The businesses employed over 1,600 full-time and 975 part-time employees, with a trimmed average (an average where the low and high were discarded to prevent skewing) of 15.38 full-time employees, slightly down from 15.52 three years ago. The firms also had a trimmed average of 7.76 part-time employees, up from 6.96 three years ago. ► Most full-time employees are in manufacturing, food and beverage, retail trade, and medical, while part-time employees are in medical, retail trade, and tourism/recreational services. ► Survey results indicated that the medical industry is the highest employer in Monticello, followed by retail trade and manufacturing. ► Businesses in the community are fairly stable with about half expecting some type of change. The BR&E identified four strategies aimed at helping businesses become more profitable. Each strategy was accompanied by a list of potential projects intended to be ideas for the community to explore. The implementation of the projects is intended to be a collaborative effort among the various sectors of the community. The four strategies identified included: 4-2 1 Economic Development City of Monticello ► Improve Business Retention and Expansion Through Technical and Development Assistance. ► Improve Labor Force Availability and Productivity. ► Improve Infrastructure to Help Move Goods, Customers, and the Labor Force More Efficiently. ► Improve and Promote the Quality of Life in Monticello. During the 2013 comprehensive plan economic development update process, it was noted that the 2010 Business Retention and Expansion Research strategies were similar to the 2008 Development Strategies. The review process identified the need to continue similar strategies into the future. Preceding the development of the 2008 Comprehensive Plan an assessment was conducted by St. Cloud State University to determine whether a bioscience park should be established in Monticello. At that time the bioscience industry was an economic development focus statewide. While the attraction of a bioscience business is not a particular focus of Monticello today, there are findings of that study that can be useful to consider in the overall development of economic development strategies for the community. Some of the Monticello's strengths for attracting businesses included: ► Land availability (compared to Metro Area). ► Access to major highways (I-94, U.S. 10 and STH 25). ► Regional growth of employment base. ► Development of local fiber optic system. ► Proximity to universities. ► Overall location. ► Expansive park system. ► Monticello Community Center. Recommended business development activities that apply to the attraction and retention of all businesses include ensuring that there are sites suitable and attractive to potential businesses available and ready for development. The community should continue to explore and establish partnerships with a variety of stakeholders that can work together to support business attraction and retention. This includes the identification of funding sources which may be an incentive for businesses locating in Monticello. When available the City should participate in special tax zones that have been made available at the state and federal level to support business development and retention. Expanding the Tax Base A traditional objective of local economic development planning is the expansion of the property tax base. Under the current system of local government finance, property taxes are the largest source of city revenue. For this reason, it is an important aspect of economic development planning in Monticello. Understanding the Property Tax System Effective strategies to promote the growth of the tax base require a clear understanding of the property tax system. Property Valuation There are three forms of property valuation. The foundation of the property tax system is Estimated Market Value. This amount is the value of a parcel of property as set by the County Assessor. In some circumstances, the State Legislature limits the amount of Estimated Market Value that can be used for taxation. These adjustments result in the Taxable Market Value. The value used to calculate property taxes is Tax Capacity. Tax Capacity Value is a percentage of Taxable Market Value. The percentage factors are set by the State Legislature and vary by class of property. Changes in the Tax System Traditional economic development theory seeks commercial and industrial development as a means of building tax base. Historically, the system supported this approach. A dollar of estimated market value of commercial -industrial property carried a higher tax capacity value than residential property. Over the past twelve years, tax "reforms" by the State Legislature have changed this situation. 2008 Comprehensive Plan — Updated 2013 Economic Development 1 4-3 CITY OF monff(do Destination Innovation PID Owner Size (Acres) 2013 Taxes Zoning .1. ........1.55.-.171...-.000030 ..............................7. X..Bowers. LLC ...................................................................................19.09..........................................$84.1.00....................................B.-4................ 2.........155.-.171-,000040 ...............................John..Chadwi ck..Farms.LLC............................................... 1.9.09. ......................................... $8.78,00.. .................................. B.-4................ 3.........1.55.-.125-.000040 .............................. Ocello..LLC...................................................................................................1...1.,8.5..........................................$6.,452.00 ............................... .B.-3................ 4.........1.55. -.125-.0......411.0 .............................. Wells. Fargo. Bank.NA................................................................6,28.............................................$6.,042.00...............................B-3................. 5.........1.55.-.125-.000070 .............................. Ocello.. LLC.................................................................................................12.96..........................................$7,.055.00...............................B.-3................ 6.........155-500-.142210 .............................. City..of.Monticello...........................................................................4.1.1..............................................$0..00............................................B.-3................ .7...........155.-.151-,003010 .............................. Bradley.&. Sharon.,Larson.....................................................1.78..............................................$2.,950.00...............................B.-4................ s......1.5.5...1.5.7...00.1.0.1.0 ............................Ghana..Prop.exti�s..l~waxy...LP.............................................5.............................................$.G.,..G8.Q..............................B-4. ... ... ... ... 9.........15.5.-.157-.00.102................................ rma..Property.LLC.....................................................................1.67.............................................$9.,.424.0..0............................... B.-4................ 10 ...1.55 171...001021 ...............................4.134 Deegan Av..enue.NE.LLC......................................1.1.6.............................................$6,304.00...............................B-4................ 1.1.....1.55.-.174-.00.1010 .............................. Ghana.. Properties. Family. LP..........................................0.90.............................................$4.,482.00............................... B.-4................ .12.....1.55 151...004010..............................Ohana. Properties Family.LP..........................................0.57.............................................$2>.476,00...............................B-4................ 13.....155.-.193-00,1020 .............................. Highland. Bank................................................................................... 7.02.............................................$7,984.00............................... B.-`1................ 14 ...1.55 164..000030..............................City of Monticello..........................................................................7.20.............................................$0.00...........................................B-4................ 15.....15.5-164-000050 ..............................City.. of Monticello...........................................................................2.1.4.............................................$0.00 ................................................................................... B-4 16.....155-164-000040 ..............................City. of Monticello ...........................................................................6.14.............................................$0.OO............................................B-4................ 17 155 176..002011...............................City ...... ........ of Monticello...........................................................................1.29........................................... ....... ............. ................. ............ .. $0 OO............................................B-4................ ..... 18.....155-.176-00,1020 ..............................City..of Monticello...........................................................................2.70.............................................$0..00............................................B.-4................ 19 ...155-164-000020 ..............................City of Monticello...........................................................................2.83.............................................$0.00...........................................B-4................ 20. ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 155-210-001010 Kleinbank 1.80 $6,160.00 B-3 2.1.....155-221-000010 ..............................Quad Development LLC ......................................................3.80.............................................$6,474.00...............................B-4 .............. 22. ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 155-227-000010 Ocello LLC 43.15 $0.00 B-4 23,.....155.-500-142400 ...............................John & Mary Lundsten...........................................................38.87.........................................$.1,628.00...............................B.-3................. 24. ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 155-213-001010 Glen & Lois Posusta 1.79 $9,800.00 B-3 .... 25.....155-500-142303 .............................. Cityof Monticello...........................................................................3.07.............................................$$0.00............................................B-3 ........................................................................... ............................................. ........................................... . ................ 26.15.5.-500-142300 ..............................City of Monticello 3.20 $0.00 B.-3................ 27. ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 155-500-142104 Premier Bank Minnesota 18.31 $29,934.00 B-4 28.....155-01.8-001020 .............................. Ci..y..of.Monticello...........................................................................5.1.1..............................................$0..00............................................ B.-2................ 29. ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 155-037-001010 Kean of Monticello, Inc 1.92 $4,938.00 B-2 30.....155-050-000020 Joseph Lofromboise Trust .............................................................................................................................................. 3.13 $3 340.00 .......................................................................... IBC 3.1.....155-029-002130 ..............................G&E Properties LLC..................................................................4.1.8..............................................$5,302.00...............................IBC .............. 32.....155-029-002120 ..............................G&E Properties LLC..................................................................2,03..............................................$2.:.940.00...............................IBC............... 33 ...155 029..002110..............................G&E. Properties LLC..................................................................2.1.1..............................................$3>.054.00..............................IBC............... 34.....155-029-,002,100 ..............................G&E Properties..LLC..................................................................2.20.............................................$3.,.186.00...............................IBC............... 35 l..5..5. -.0.2..9..-.0.0.2.0.9..O .............................G&.E Properties LLC 2.28............................................$3,300.00..............................IBC............... 36. ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 155-029-002050 Kenneth Maus 5.40 .$ ,230.00 IBC 37.....155-068-00.1010 .............................. Riverwood. Bank...............................................................................19.35..........................................$30,286.00........................... B.-3................. 38. ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 155-185-001010 State of Minnesota 1.58 $0.00 B-3 39.....155-202-,00,1060 ..............................IRET.Properties.................................................................................0,51..............................................$0..00............................................ B.-3................. 40.....15.5.-079-00101.0 ..............................Tyoti RPatel..............................................................................................0.79.............................................$0.00............................................B.-3................. 41. ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 155-011-000171 Monticello Industrial Park 40.83 $0.00 B2/IBC. 42.....155-212-001010 ..............................Ryan Companies US INC....................................................1.54.............................................$0.00............................................B.-4................ 43 ...1.55 212..001030 ............................ Kean of.Monticello, Inc.......................................................1.09.............................................$0 OO............................................B-4................ 44.....155-178-002030 ..............................Ryan Companies US INC ....................................................1.27.............................................$0.OO............................................B.-4................ 45 ...155 205..001020 .............. Ryan Companies US INC ................................................................1,87.............................................$0 OO...........................................B-4................ 46.....1.5.5-117-002010 ..............................MMC Land Company LLC..............................................5.04.............................................$0.00............................................B.-4................ 47 155 117-001030 MMC Company LLC... 2.24 ........ $0 00 B-4 .............. 48.....1.55.-086-000010 .............................. SPO.. LLC.......................................................................................................0.95.............................................$0..00............................................ B.-2................ 49.....1.5.5.-.196-.000020 ..............................Monticello.. Industrial. Park, ..Inc ...................................1.4 .............................................. $263.00 ..................................... -PUD..._ JKMonticello Destination for Innovation Updated: 4/2016 CHAPTER 3: ZONING DISTRICTS Section 3.6 Industrial Base Zoning Districts Subsection (C) Industrial and Business Campus District Section 3.6 (C) IBCIndustrial and Business Campus District The purpose of the "IBC" industrial business campus district is to provide for the establishment of limited light industrial business offices, limited light manufacturing, wholesale showrooms and related uses in an environment which provides a high level of amenities, including landscaping, preservation of natural features, architectural controls, and other features. Base Lot Area • Minimum = 8,000 sq ft. Base Lot Width • Minimum= 100 ft. Typical IBC Lot Configuration Typical IBC Building Types City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 123 CHAPTER 3: ZONING DISTRICTS Section 3.6 Industrial Base Zoning Districts Subsection (C) Industrial and Business Campus District REQUIRED YARDS (in feet) [I] Max Height (stories Max Floor Area Max Impervious (% Front Interior Street Rear / feet) Ratio (FAR) of gross lot area) Side Side 2 stories All Uses 50 30 50 40 30 feet (Reserved) (Reserved) [2] [ 1 ]: When any yard abuts a zoning district other than I -I or 1-2, the setbacks for the abutting yard must be 50 feet. [2]: Multi -story buildings may be allowed as a conditional use pursuant to Section 2.4(D)contingent upon strict adherence to fire safety code provisions as specified by the International Building Code as adopted in Title 4. Chapter I of the Monticello City Code. Accessory Structures See Section 5.3(B) for all general standards and limitations on accessory structures. Additional In the IBC district, every effort shall be made to preserve natural ponding areas and features of the land Regulations to create passive open space. ■ Section 3.3. Common District Reauirements Other Section 3.60. Standards ADDlicable to All Industrial Base Zoning Districts Regulations Section 4.1. LandscaDinQ_ and Screening_ Standards to Consult Section 4.5. Signs (not all inclusive) Section 4.8. Off -Street Parking Section 4.9. Off -Street Loading ■ Section 4.11. Buildine Materials is Lots must be a minimum ioo feet wide and more than 8000 square feet in total size z: Front yard and side street setbacks of 50 feet are required 3: High amenities and natural features are to highlight development in the IBC district 4: Maximum structure height of 30 feet unless otherwise authorized by conditional use permit Z . 3 5.30 foot interior side yard setbacks required r9o' Max Ht 6. Landscaped parking islands required every 24 spaces in the IBC district 7. Parking areas set back a minimum of 6 feet from property lines #f jr �� �• lhdal'strj71 Page 124 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Section 3.6 (D) 1.1 Light Industrial District The purpose of the "I-1," light industrial, district is to provide for the establishment of warehousing and light industrial development. Base Lot Area • Minimum = 20,000 square feet Base Lot Width • Minimum= 100 feet Typical 1-1 Lot Configuration CHAPTER 3: ZONING DISTRICTS Section 3.6 Industrial Base Zoning Districts Subsection (D) 1-I: Light Industrial District Typical 1-1 Building Types City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 125 CHAPTER 3: ZONING DISTRICTS Section 3.6 Industrial Base Zoning Districts Subsection (D) I -I: Light Industrial District REQUIRED YARDS (in feet) [1] Max Height (stories Max Floor Area Max Impervious (% Front Interior Street Rear / feet) Ratio (FAR) of gross lot area) Side Side All Uses 30 15 30 15 2 stories (Reserved) (Reserved) 30 feet [2] [ I ]: When any yard abuts a zoning district other than I -I or 1-2, the setbacks for the abutting yard must be 50 feet. [2]: Multi -story buildings may be allowed as a conditional use pursuant to Section 2.40) contingent upon strict adherence to fire safety code provisions as specified by the International Building Code as adopted in Title 4. Chapter I of the Monticello City Code. Accessory Structures See Section 5.3(B) for all general standards and limitations on accessory structures. ■ Section 3.3. Common District Requirements Other Section 3.60. Standards ADDlicable to All Industrial Base Zoning Districts Regulations • Section 4.1. LandscaDlne and Screening_ Standards to Consult Section 4.5. Signs (not all Section 4.8. Off -Street Parking inclusive) Section 4.9. Off -Street Loading ■ Section 4.11. Building Materials is Minimum street side yard setback of 30 feet. 2: Minimum front yard setback of 3: Minimum lot width of ioo 4et 4: Light manufacturing plant as a permitted use 5: Interior side yard setbacks cf 15 feet 6: Minimum lot size of 2o,000 square feet 7: Rear yard setback of 15 feet, -20.000 SF MINIMUM Page 126 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance CHAPTERS: USE STANDARDS Section 5.1 Use Table Subsection (A) Explanation of Use Table Structure Residential Uses 5.2(C)(1) Attached Dwelling Types 5.2(C)(21(a) - Duplex p C 5.2(C)(2)(b) - Townhouse C p M 5.2(C)(2)(c) - Multiple -Family C P C C 5.2(C)(2)(d) Detached Dwelling p p p p p p None Group Residential P P P P P 5.2(C)(3) Facility, Single Family Group Residential C C C 5.2(C)(3) Facility, Multi -Family Mobile & Manufactured C C C P C 5.2(C)(4) Home / Home Park Civic & Institutional Uses Active Park Facilities P P P P P P P PP P P p p p p None (public) Active Park Facilities P P P P P P P 5.2(D)(I) (private) Assisted Living Facilities C p C I 5.2(D)(2) Cemeteries C C C C C C C C P P C 5.2(D)(3-)! None Clinics/Medical Services Essential Services P P P P P P P P None P P P P P P P Hospitals C PIN P C 5.2(D)-(4-) Nursing/Convalescent C C C C C C C C C PP 5.2(D)(5) Home Passenger Terminal C C C C None Passive Parks and Open P P P P P P P P P P P P p p p None Space Place of Public Assembly C C C C C p C 5.2(D)(6) Public Buildings or Uses C C C C C C C P C C P P C P P 5.2(D)(7) Schools, K-12 C C C C C C I I 5.2(D)(8) Schools, Higher1 None EducationF C Utilities (major) C C C 5.2(D)(9) Office Uses Offices ■ �� P P C P P P P 5.2(E1 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 319 CHAPTER 5: USE STANDARDS Section 5.1 Use Table Subsection (A) Explanation of Use Table Structure Commercial Uses Adult Uses Auction House Auto Repair — Minor Automotive Wash Facilities Bed & Breakfasts Boarding House Brew Pub Business Support Services Commercial Lodging Communications/Broadcasting Convenience Retail Country Club Day Care Centers Entertainment/Recreation, Indoor Commercial Entertainment/Recreation, Outdoor Commercial Financial Institution Funeral Services Kennels (commercial) Landscaping/ Nursery Business Personal Services Production Brewery or Micro -Distillery without Taproom Production Brewery or Micro -Distillery with Taproom or Cocktail Room Recreational Vehicle Camp Site Repair Establishment Restaurants Retail Commercial Uses (other) Specialty Eating Establishments C C P C ����� C C• C P C• CICI IP I P P C C P C P PI IP CI PI PIP CIC CP P C P P P P P C I P P P PP C PIP P OP P P I P C I a 3.7(K1 5.2(F)(2) 5.2(F)(3) 5.2(F)(4) 5.2(F)(5) 5.2(F)(6) 5.2(F)(7) None 5.2(F)(8) 5.2(F)(9) 5.2(F)(1 O) 5.2(F)(II) 5.20 (12) 5.2(F)(I 3 5.2(F)(14) 5.2(F)(I 5) 5.2(F)(I 6) 5.2(F)(I 7 5.2(F)(I 8 5.2(F)(22) 5.2(G)(I 01 5.2(F)(24) 5.2(G)(I 11) 5.2(F)(25) 5.2(F)(26) 5.2(F)(27) 5.2(F)(28) 5.2(F)(29) Page 320 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance CHAPTERS: USE STANDARDS Section 5.1 Use Table Subsection (A) Explanation of Use Table Structure Vehicle fuel Sales C C CI 1� 5.2(F)(30) Vehicle Sales and Rental C 5.2(F)(31) Veterinary Facilities C 5.2(F)(32) (Rural) Veterinary Facilities C C C 5.20(32) (Neighborhood) Wholesale Sales P P P None Industrial Uses Auto Repair — Major C �P P 5.2(G)(I) Bulk Fuel Sales and P P 5.2(G)(2) Storage Contractor's Yard, Temporary 5.2(G 3 Extraction of Materials I I I 5.2(G)(4) General Warehousing C C P P 5.2(G)(5) Heavy Manufacturing C 5.2(G)(6) Industrial Services C P None Land Reclamation C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C 5.2(G)(7) Light Manufacturing P P P 5.2(6)(8) Machinery/Truck Repair P P 5.2(G)(9) & Sales Recycling and Salvage C C 5.2(G)( 10) Center Self -Storage Facilities P C P 5.2(G)( I1) Truck or Freight C P P 5.2 G I2 Terminal Waste Disposal & IC 5.2(�(13) Incineration Wrecker Services C P 5.20(14) Commercial Day Care Commercial Lodging C P C C C P C none none 5.2(F)( 12 5.2(F)(8) City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 321 CHAPTERS: USE STANDARDS Section S. I Use Table Subsection (A) Explanation of Use Table Structure Commercial Recreation: Outdoor Convenience Retail Funeral Services Medical / Clinical Services Personal Services Places of Public Assembly Production Brewery or Micro - Distillery with Taproom or Cocktail Room Professional Office -Services Including Financial Institutions Restaurants, Bars < 10,000 SF Restaurants, Bars > 10,000 SF Retail Sales < 10,000 SF Retail Sales > 10,000 SF Retail with Service Specialty Eating Establishments < 10,000 SF Vehicle Fuel Sales Veterinary Facilities Residential — Upper Floors Residential — Street Level Residential — Multiple Family Residential — Townhouse Residential — Single Family Industrial PUD Public Buildings or Uses C C none C P* C C *F-2 Drive Through by CUP — C C = none L-2: NA first floor, C P P P CUP upper floors P P P P L-3: CUP C C C C none C C C C P P P C P P C C P C C P P C C P C C P C C P* P* C* P* C C C* C P C C none L-2: NA first floor, CUP upper floors none none none none L-2: NA first floor, CUP upper floors *Drive Through by CUP L-8 only none P P P P L-2: NA WrC C L-2: NA C C L-2: NA C none C none L-3: PUD Only C I C I C I P I none 5.2(F)(14) 5.2U(! 0) 5.2U(! 6) 5.2U(! 9) 5.20(22) 5.2(F)(23) 5.2(F)(24) 5.2 F 15 5.2(F)(2 1) 5.20 (27) 5.20 (27) 5.2(F)(28) 5.20(28) 5.20(28) 5.20(29) 5.20(30) 5.20(32) Page 322 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Interchange Map Option #1 Legend Proposed Land Uses 0 Commercial W Industrial Medium Density Residential Single Family Residential Gross Land Use Acres: Single Family Residential 1,499 Ac. Medium Density Residential 223 Ac. Commercial 248 Ac. Industrial 116 Ac. Net Land Use Acres (excludes wet areas, greenway & ROW, but incorporates land where existing roads may be removed): Single Family Residential 1040 Ac. Medium Density Residential 146 Ac. Commercial 193 Ac. Industrial 103 Ac. Existing Land Uses Commercial Industrial OInterchange Area /��� Parks and Open Space r-------- i City Boundary -----■ Proposed Roads Existing Roads CConcept Greenway (1000 Ft. Corridor) Wet Areas (Lakes, Rivers, Wetlands) Parcels N 0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. Or/ 4150 Olson Memorial Highway, Ste. 320, Golden Valle V. MN 55422 Telephone: 763.957.1100 Website: www.nacplanning.com Source: NAC, Inc., WSB & Assc., Wright County February 8, 2016 120TH Birch Unnamed a m 100TH Ud La. g Bertram Lake / 1 / m 0 0 0 0 170TH r -- r E Interchange Map Option #2 Legend Proposed Land Uses 0 Commercial W Industrial Medium Density Residential Single Family Residential Gross Land Use Acres: Single Family Residential 940 Ac. Medium Density Residential 123 Ac. Commercial 123 Ac. Industrial 184 Ac. Net Land Use Acres (excludes wet areas, greenway & ROW, but incorporates land where existing roads may be removed): Single Family Residential 769 Ac. Medium Density Residential 115 Ac. Commercial 44 Ac. Industrial 155 Ac. Existing Land Uses Commercial O Interchange Area Industrial Parks and Open Space i --------i City Boundary -----■ Proposed Roads Existing Roads Concept Greenway (1000 Ft. Corridor) Wet Areas (Lakes, Rivers, Wetlands) Parcels N 0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. 4150 Olson Memorial HighwaV, Ste. 320, Golden Valley, MN 55422 Telephone: 763.957.110^ Website: www.nacplanning.com Source: NAC, Inc., WSB & Assc., Wright County 120TH Unnamed Birch 1 1 _. -� i o First Lake 1 100TH /Mud Lake 99TH ; Lake z Bertram Lake � �/ / 9 I 3 u z Interchange Map Option #3 Legend Proposed Land Uses 0 Commercial W Industrial Medium Density Residential Single Family Residential Gross Land Use Acres: Single Family Residential 1,235 Ac. Medium Density Residential 140 Ac. Commercial 405 Ac. Industrial 466 Net Land Use Acres (excludes wet areas, greenway & ROW, but incorporates land where existing roads may be removed): Single Family Residential 941 Ac. Medium Density Residential 127 Ac. Commercial 249 Ac. Industrial 303 Existing Land Uses Commercial Industrial Parks and Open Space r-------- i City Boundary -■ Proposed Roads Existing Roads OInterchange Area Concept Greenway (1000 Ft. Corridor) Wet Areas (Lakes, Rivers, Wetlands) Parcels N 0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. 4150 Olson Memorial Hiqhway, Ste. 320, Golden Valley, MN S5422 Telephone: 763.957.1100 Website: www.nacplanning.com Source: NAC, Inc., WSB & Assc., Wright County February 8, 2016 Interchange Map Option #4 No Build Legend Proposed Land Uses 1w— Medium Density Residential Single Family Residential Gross Land Use Acres: Single Family Residential 1,172 Ac. Medium Density Residential 123 Ac. Net Land Use Acres (excludes wet areas, greenway & ROW, but incorporates land where existing roads may be removed): Single Family Residential 919 Ac. Medium Density Residential 73 Ac. Existing Land Uses Commercial Industrial Parks and Open Space r-------- i City Boundary ------ Proposed Roads Existing Roads Concept Greenway (1000 Ft. Corridor) Wet Areas (Lakes, Rivers, Wetlands) Parcels N 0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. 4150 Olson MemonaI Highway, Ste. 320, 'en valley, MN 55422 Telephone: 763.957.1100 Website: www.nacl)lanning.com Source: NAC, Inc., WSB & Assc., Wright County March 1, 2016 Legend I — — I ICit of Monticello I i Off ici I Zoning M P � � I \ 1 I \ \ I \ \ I \� I \ I \ \ I \ o I \\ 3 \ � I \ \ I � I I ---------— c --- ----_ I — — — — — — — — — — — —I \ Praire Rd Hi W E I \ I � I e�, I BASE ZONING DISTRICTS d Residential DistrictsBusiness Districts i -- Low Residential Densities- \ (k Kama w3 d i i AO R -A R-1 -- Medium Residential Densities T -N R-2 C R -PUD -- High Residential Densities 8-2 8-3 . 8-4 CCD Industrial Districts ] pec 1-1 R-3 ----------, 01 Swan River --------- ; Monticello M -H' PUDs L-------- High School OTHER Water OVERLAY DISTRICTS ----------1 03 il Mills Fleet Farm ----------1 04 1 Red Rooster Performance Based Overlay District Special Use Overlay District Mississippi Wild, Scenic & Rec Overlay District Shoreland District I Freeway Bonus Sign District • • \\��� ` I � c Sys ; h ., � � — \ — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — jfJ/yI►.J[ — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — i I[IIiijm MAN ►■ �■ IIIII �C U � !i ■S = 1111■ ■ 11111111 } -------- July 5, 2017 Ms. Angela Schumann, AICP Community Development Director City of Monticello 505 Walnut St., Suite 1 Monticello, MN 55362 RE: Withdraw the request for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning for Outlot D, Otter Creek Crossing, PID #155-171-000040. Dear Angela; I would like to withdraw the application for the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning for the above referenced property. Please send a refund of the escrow funds to me at: 4477 Manitou Road Excelsior, MN 55331 Thank You for your assistance. John Chadwick Farms, LLC Jo hadwick City Council Agenda — 07/24/2017 4C. Consideration to approve a request for Development Stage Planned Unit Development for Vehicle Sales and Rental, Auto Repair — Minor, and Accessory Office and Retail Uses in a B-3 (Highwav Business) District, including allowance for 130' flag pole height Applicant: FRHP Lincolnshire, LLC (NAC) Property: Legal: Lot 1, Block 1 Maas Addition, together with Lot 1, Block 1 Camping World First Addition PID: 155225001010,155243001010 Planning Case Number: 2017-011 A. REFERENCE & BACKGROUND Request(s): Development Stage PUD Rezoning to PUD District (to be considered with Final Stage Application) Deadline for Decision: Applicant request to table to July Planning Commission meeting Land Use Designation: Places to Shop Zoning Designation: B-3, Highway Business District The purpose of the B-3 district is to provide for limited commercial and service activities and provide for and limit the establishment of motor vehicle oriented or dependent commercial and service activities. Overlays/Environmental Regulations Applicable: Freeway Bonus Sign Overlay District Current Site Use: Vehicle Service and Vehicle Sales/Display Surrounding Land Uses: North: I-94 East: Multi -tenant Commercial South: Vacant Commercial Land West: Motorsports Dealership Project Description: The applicant, Camping World, currently occupies the westerly of the two properties under a Conditional Use Permit granted in 2016. As a part of that permit, Camping World replatted the 8.85 -acre main site at 3801 Chelsea Road and did some site and building City Council Agenda — 07/24/2017 improvements to accommodate the transition of the former automobile dealership site. While the initial CUP was being reviewed and constructed, the applicant acquired the 6 -acre property to the east, which was formerly occupied by Bedrock Motors. Bedrock had received a series of zoning approvals to occupy the existing property and two older buildings. The site and buildings were nonconforming in a variety of ways, but were eligible for use based on the Bedrock land use approvals in their then -existing condition without expansion of the buildings or expansion of the sales/display area onto the extensive green space on the property. In its current condition, the green space consumes nearly half (2.8 acres +) of the subject property. Camping World may potentially occupy the Bedrock site under the permit conditions as applied under the Bedrock permits. However, Camping World proposes to integrate the current western site activities (primarily sales, display, and some service and retail uses) with activities on the Bedrock site (primarily detailing and vehicle preparation) in the buildings, and construct an expanded sales/display area over the full extent of the property, including the current green space. This aspect of the project raises a potential conflict with the building size -to -lot size ratio applicable to vehicle sales. In their original application, the applicant proposed a freestanding sign in excess of the sign ordinance height regulations, but has since provided written correspondence that they propose a sign meeting ordinance regulations. The applicant further proposes a flagpole in excess of the typical maximum height limitations. Finally, the applicant's site plans propose curbing only for a portion of the existing and new paved bituminous sales and parking area. 2 City Council Agenda — 07/24/2017 ANALYSIS As noted above, the applicant is seeking a PUD approval to accommodate the expansion of their current recreational Vehicle Sales/Display and Auto Repair and service operation from its current extent at 3801 Chelsea Road, about 8.85 acres, by adding the Bedrock Motors site to the east, about 6 acres in area. The two adjoining properties would function cooperatively, with the Bedrock site serving more in support of the main sales facility at 3801 Chelsea. Also as noted above, the applicant proposes to include the following elements in the project: • 2.8 acres (approximately) of additional paved sales/display area on the Bedrock site; • A 70 foot tall freestanding sign with 250 square feet of sign area in NW corner of Bedrock site. The applicant has provided written correspondence that they propose a sign meeting ordinance regulations. • Re -facing of existing monument signage on Bedrock site. The applicant's site plan dated 2-26-17 illustrates removal of the monument sign on the east property, and proposes to maintain the exiting monument on the west property, which is not conforming to ordinance setback Further, the sign is located within City right of way and would require a license agreement to remain in its current location. • A 130 foot tall flagpole in NE corner of Bedrock site. • Site lighting utilizing re -purposed light fixtures from 3801 Chelsea. • Additional street tree planting. The applicant's revised grading plans illustrate additional landscaping, but does not provide planting detail. • No changes to the two existing Bedrock site buildings, which total approximately 10,500 square feet in area. • Expansion of the existing bituminous area on the Bedrock site. • Additional curbing proposed on the west and north property lines of the Bedrock site. • Manually operated gates at the two eastern -most of the three curb cuts on the Bedrock site. • Removal of the western -most access of the Bedrock site. • A paved connection between the two properties near the north end of the common boundary. Because many of these elements are outside of the commonly applicable zoning requirements, and because the applicant is seeking consideration of a single business entity over two separate parcels which can be separately conveyed, a PUD request has been made to allow the City to consider flexibility in the application of its zoning ordinance standards. An alternative to the PUD approach would be a request for variances to the various standards that are not being met by the proposal. 3 City Council Agenda — 07/24/2017 The standard of review is different for PUD consideration and variance consideration. For PUD, the City is charged to find that the flexibility granted from the standard zoning requirements is offset by the design of the project, and elements included in the project design that result in a project that is superior to that of regular zoning in achieving the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan and the intent of the zoning ordinance. For variance, the City is required to find that there are unique conditions of the property that result in practical difficulties that interfere with putting the property to what the City would otherwise consider to be a reasonable use. Variance considerations most often deal with unique topography or existing conditions that impact the property in a way that makes it difficult to use it according to the expectations of the zoning district or its neighboring properties. Those conditions do not appear to be present on this parcel, given its large size and relative flat and open condition. Thus, the applicant is seeking the PUD approval, and the City will need to weigh the areas of flexibility against factors that are proposed beyond the requirements of standard zoning. Characteristics of other PUDs may be relevant to this analysis, but most PUD reviews are unique due to the specifics of the project. Existing Improvements and Permits. In 2012, the City approved a series of amendments and Conditional Use Permits to accommodate the proposal of Bedrock Motors to occupy the 6 acre site in question. Those approvals permitted Bedrock to move a motor vehicle sales facility, including major and minor auto repair, onto the property in its existing condition, which is as the site sits now. The applicant was granted permits for sales, and a sales lot on the existing paved area, including the driveway aisle that extends to the north portion of the site abutting I-94. The permits prohibited sales lot use of the grassy 2.8 acres between the building area and the north boundary. In addition, the applicant was able to conduct truck sales and service on the site pursuant to a zoning amendment to the B-3 District. Included in the approvals were variances to defer landscaping and screening requirements that would have applied to the use. Finally, the applicant was required to make only minimal interior changes to the buildings — building code related — without the need to meet the commercial building standards. The current applicants — Camping World — would be permitted to occupy the site in its existing condition, and under the same requirements, as those applied to Bedrock Motors without further zoning approvals. With the proposed expansion of the paved areas for sales/display, flagpole height request, and the proposal for curbing around only a portion of the paved areas, the applicant is seeking a PUD approval to occupy the site and make the improvements requested. E City Council Agenda — 07/24/2017 Summary of PUD Flexibilitv Requested The proposal seeks the following areas of flexibility from the requirements of the zoning ordinance: Curbing. Waiver of curb requirements around a portion of the paved parking, display, and vehicle storage areas on the east side of the site. The existing extent of paving on the east side of the former Bedrock site does not currently meet the 6' setback from adjacent property lines and does not appear to be curbed, which the applicant does not propose to change. The proposed pavement expansion area appears to meet the 6' setback, but the applicant will be required to verify the extent of the proposed pavement area. The zoning ordinance requires this improvement for all such areas. The applicant proposes to curb the west and north areas of the site, but does not propose to install curb along the east side of the site. The zoning ordinance also requires paving and curblines to meet a 6 foot setback from the property lines, with an exception for shared driveways and access by Conditional Use Permit. 2. Building Area. Waiver of the required minimum building size ratio for vehicle sales. The zoning ordinance allows vehicle sales lots by Conditional Use Permit, with a requirement that no less than 15% of parcels of more than 4 acres are covered by building area. For a 6 -acre site such as the subject property, the minimum building area on the east parcel should be approximately 39,100 square feet. The existing buildings on the east property are approximately 10,500 square in total floor area, about 4% of the lot area. 3. Freestanding Sign. The applicants have revised their application to indicate that they will meet code requirements for the free-standing sign in terms of height and area. The proposed setback for the sign is not dimensioned, but appears to be approximately 8 feet from the I-94 right of way. Finally, the applicants propose to construct the sign on a painted pylon. The zoning ordinance in the Freeway Bonus Sign Overlay District allows maximum sign height of 32 feet, and 200 square feet. In addition, the ordinance requires a setback of 1 S feet from public right of way, and architectural treatment of the pylon with commercial building materials such as stone, stucco, or similar treatment. 4. Flawole. The applicants propose a flagpole in the northeast corner of the site with a height of 130 feet. The zoning ordinance creates an exception for the zoning district's height of flagpoles, permitting them to be 25 feet higher than the requirements of the zoning district. 5 City Council Agenda — 07/24/2017 In the B-3, the maximum building height is 30 feet, thus allowing flagpoles to be a maximum of SS feet in height. 5. Building materials. The applicants propose to use the existing metal -clad buildings as they exist, with no changes to the facade or materials. The zoning ordinance requires commercial buildings to meet architectural standards including exterior materials of masonry and glass. 6. Landscaping. The applicants have revised their grading plan to indicate that they will provide additional landscaping on the south portion of the east parcel with landscaping to meet City ordinance. The zoning ordinance identifies specific landscape quantities that are required for any new development, but exempts vehicle sales and display areas from vehicular buffer yard requirements. However, as noted below, staff recommends revision of the site plan or landscaping plan to demonstrate compliance with code requirements for the southern portion of the former Bedrock site in recognition of the flexibility the City may wish to grant as related to the building ratio requirement. Purpose and Analysis of PUD Approval Request The zoning ordinance identifies the purpose of PUD as follows: The purpose of the Planned Unit Development (PUD) zoning district is to provide greater flexibility in the development of neighborhoods and non-residential areas in order to maximize public values and achieve more creative development outcomes while remaining economically viable and marketable. This is achieved by undertaking a process that results in a development outcome exceeding that which is typically achievable through the conventional zoning district. The City reserves the right to deny the PUD rezoning and direct the developer to re -apply under the standard applicable zoning district. As such, it is important that the City identifies elements, and makes findings, related to how the proposed PUD project meets these objectives. The ability to identify specific aspects supporting the purpose of PUD is critical to ensuring that it is not used to merely avoid zoning regulations, and to ensure that zoning regulations are applied evenly and fairly between different properties and property owners. To accomplish the PUD purpose, as stated above, staff has identified a series of recommendations for the site to support PUD zoning. These include the following: Paving and Curbing. The applicant's plan shows an extensive area of existing paving from the Bedrock permits, and an expansion area of new paving for the expansion of Camping World's sales/display/storage use. A portion of these areas are proposed to be curbed, as required by the zoning R City Council Agenda — 07/24/2017 ordinance. As with the sign regulations, the City has uniformly required paved areas to include curb for purposes of traffic containment, stormwater management, pavement maintenance, and green space protection, among other reasons. The only exceptions to this requirement have been where future expansions have suggested that limited areas of curbing were to be deferred to a later date. That is not the case with the application. While occupancy of the property in its current condition by a new business that was not expanding or changing any of the site use could occur without these improvements, the request for PUD and sales lot paving expansions allow the City to consider the addition of curb as part of this permit approval. As such, staff recommends that curbing be required surrounding the paved areas (both existing and new), including the eastern edge of the former "Bedrock" site as required by the zoning ordinance. Flagpole height. The zoning ordinance provides an exception to the height limitations in each zoning district by accommodating flagpoles at 25 feet taller than the zoning district building height limitation. Staff is unaware of any exceptions granted to this allowance, whether through PUD or variance. As such staff recommends that the applicant adhere to the maximum flagpole height allowance — in this case 55 feet — applicable to all properties in this zoning district. In addition, staff recommends that the applicant shift the location of the flagpole further to the interior to the site, setback from the east and north property lines a distance equivalent to the front yard building setback of 30' from both property lines. At present, the flag pole appears to be located approximately 10' from the north and east property lines. Building area and architecture/materials. The applicant is proposing to occupy the existing buildings without change in either materials, floor area, or other improvements. As noted above, this raises a conflict with the zoning ordinance's regulation of vehicle sales lots, in which such uses are required to have a building that is at least 15% of the lot size as the principal use, supporting the vehicle sales lot as an accessory activity. The existing buildings cover just 4% of the site, well below the threshold. The purpose of the coverage regulation was to ensure that in exchange for devoting significant acreage of prime freeway frontage to large vehicle sales lots, the property owner would also provide a principal building which supported larger numbers of employees and created a tax base commensurate with the value of freeway exposure. As the area along Chelsea Road and I-94 developed, the subject property remained in its previous condition, with the expectation that a property owner would eventually develop it in a manner similar to those common in this 7 City Council Agenda — 07/24/2017 corridor. Such a development would, presumably, include replacement of these non -conforming metal pole buildings with a larger, contemporary building and more intense use — intense in terms of both value and employment. The Camping World proposal — while understandable in the context of the nature of their business — does not meet those goals. To consider a PUD approval that increases sales lot area without other improvements raises a conflict with the intent of both the underlying zoning, and the intent of PUD zoning regulations. To address this conflict, there are three alternatives in regard to the buildings on the site. 1. Expansion of any of the existing buildings on the full proposed Camping World site to meet code ratio requirements. This alternative may present challenges due the potential cost and scope given the manner the applicant is proposing to use the site, but is the most direct way of meeting the intent of the zoning. 2. Improve the existing buildings through architectural and materials enhancements that promote the intent, if not the letter, of the City's commercial building standards. While this alternative would not meet the coverage requirement, it would at least address the architectural objectives of the zoning ordinance and Comprehensive Plan, giving the City some measure of return on the PUD flexibility being proposed. 3. Incorporate more intense screening along the Chelsea Road frontage of the Bedrock site. In this alternative, views of the property would be directed to the main facility, and the visual impact of the property to passing local traffic would be minimized. To implement this alternative, an aesthetically pleasing fence or wall would be recommended, with additional landscaping screening. The applicant's revised plans appear to work toward this alternative. The applicant has proposed an ornamental fence on the south and east side of the site, but has not provided detail offence height or material. With the addition of landscaping in front of the proposed fence along the Chelsea Road edge, this site could be made to be visually appealing, and more clearly identify it as an accessory yard supporting the main site where the primary use is located. The applicant should provide additional detail with final stage PUD plans for both the proposed fence and landscaping. City Council Agenda — 07/24/2017 Proposed Dumb Station It should be noted that the applicant has proposed to add two recreational vehicle "dump stations" to their site plan. One will be located on the primary west retail lot, with the second on the easterly lot. This addition was not proposed on the site plan provided to the Planning Commission. The applicant will be required to provide additional detail regarding these improvements per the direction of the City's Water and Sewer Superintendent and City Engineer. Resolution of any comments related to this system will be required prior to Final Stage PUD approval. A condition in this regard has been added in the alternative actions. Citv Engineer's Comments The City Engineer has provided comments regarding the application within the attached the stormwater plan review checklist for the Camping World site, for which compliance is required. Additional information related to stormwater management and a response to the City Engineer's comment letter were submitted to city staff on Thursday, July 20. The revised changes were not included in the Planning Commission agenda. Rezoning and Final Stage PUD The City Council will note that this review is for Development Stage approval only. The applicant will be required to revise their plans and submit for final stage PUD. The Council will consider final stage PUD and rezoning to PUD actions concurrently. Planning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission reviewed this item and held a public hearing on the Development Stage PUD and rezoning to PUD requests on July 11th, 2017, after prior requests to table the item and continue the hearing by the applicant. Walter Kucharyszyn representing FRHP Lincolnshire, LLC/Camping World was present to address the Commission. Mr. Kucharyszyn indicated that he had no issues with meeting the conditions outlined, with the following exceptions or notations: Mr. Kucharyszyn requested that the Commission consider allowing the existing monuments to remain as currently located as they allow for better site distance for drivers needing to make the proper turns into the site; for curbing along the east line, it would be their preference to maintain the existing condition; regarding the flagpole, Mr. Kucharyszyn stated that the flagpole and its requested height was of particular importance to the business and they would like to request keeping it at the proposed height; in regard to the existing buildings on site, Camping World had provided a E City Council Agenda — 07/24/2017 landscaping and fencing plan as related to option "C" for exhibit condition #9 and would propose that those elements satisfy the condition. Shawn Weinand, Ocello LLC, property owner in the area, addressed the Commission. Mr. Weinand stated his concerns about the need to maintain compliance with the building materials standards within the zoning ordinance for commercial districts. He noted that application of the building materials requirements helps to maintain visual aesthetics along Chelsea Road and property values for commercial districts. Mr. Weinand indicated that his preference would be for the applicant to bring the two existing buildings on the easterly parcel up to the commercial building material standards. Planning Commission Chair Brad Fyle and Commissioner Simpson expressed that the flagpole height proposed by the applicant was acceptable to them. The Commissioners then discussed the materials on the existing buildings. Chair Fyle noted his support for bringing the buildings into compliance with the building materials ordinance with the proposed display and storage area expansion. After discussion, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the rezoning and development stage PUD, with the modifications as listed below to Exhibit Z. 1. Meet the architectural materials requirements of the pylon sign standards. 2. Allow existing monument(s) to remain; the applicant shall enter into a license agreement for the encroachment into the ROW. 3. Provide curbing around the entire paved area, consistent with the requirements of the zoning ordinance. 4. Revise landscaping plan to provide quantity and species for proposed landscaping along south portion of the site. 5. Provide materials and height detail for proposed ornamental fence. 6. Accommodate to the proposed flagpole height of 130 feet. 7. Locate the flagpole at a distance from the east and north property line a distance of 30' 8. Demonstrate FAA review and approval for flagpole as required. b. Upgrade the existing buildings with exterior architectural treatments to meet/exceed the requirements for commercial buildings; er 10 City Council Agenda — 07/24/2017 c. Construct a fence or wall around the east and south boundaries of the east parcel, with landscaping on east and south sides to create an attractive visual screen, and which focuses traffic and attention to the main property (3801 Chelsea). 10. Revise site and building plans to illustrate consistency in proposed improvements. 11. Comply with the comments of the City Engineer per the checklist included with the staff report of July 11 th, 2017. 12. Applicant shall enter into a development agreement for the proposed planned unit development. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS The Planning Commission unanimously recommends Alternative #1 below. Motion to approve the Development Stage Planned Unit Development for Camping World, based on the findings in Resolution No. PC -2017-016, with the conditions identified in Exhibit Z as recommended by the Planning Commission, with the additional condition that the applicant address all comments of the City Engineer and Water & Sewer Superintendent as related to the proposed RV dump station. 2. Motion to approve the Development Stage Planned Unit Development for Camping World, based on the findings in Resolution No. PC -2017-016, with conditions as identified in Exhibit Z as recommended by staff in the staff report of 7/24/17, with the additional condition that the applicant address all comments of the City Engineer and Water & Sewer Superintendent as related to the proposed RV dump station. 3. Motion to deny approval of the Development Stage Planned Unit Development and Rezoning, based on findings to be stated by the City Council. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the applicant revise their plans consistent with the conditions listed in Exhibit Z to better address the required standards of the zoning ordinance and to balance the requested flexibility with the intent for PUD consideration. Staff has identified areas of change to the project which could be enhanced that would help the City consider this as a legitimate use of PUD zoning. These elements are identified above, and listed in staff version of Exhibit Z to this report. Planning 11 I� City Council Agenda — 07/24/2017 Commission has made a recommendation as related to the conditions, which is also included. As discussed in this report, these improvements could be viewed as qualifying for PUD consideration by improving the visual appeal to the property — considering the retention of the older buildings — and focus attention on the compliant site. As the applicants note in their materials, little or no customer traffic is expected to use the "Bedrock" property, so improvements to a high-profile commercial site should either meet the requirements of the code, or at the least, direct views to those properties that do. It is noted that Council's review of the Development Stage PUD includes the proposed dump stations on each of the two sites, and that staff recommends that the Council can proceed with this change, but with the added condition as shown on both the staff and Planning Commission versions of Exhibit Z. SUPPORTING DATA A. Resolution No. PC -2017-016 B. Draft Ordinance No. 663 C. Aerial Site Image D. Applicant Narrative E. Certificate of Survey F. Existing Topography G. Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plan H. Details I. Site Plan, revised with dump station addition J. Landscaping Plan K. Photometric L. Sign & Flag Plan M. Pylon Sign Detail N. Monument Sign Detail O. Fence Detail P. Flagpole Structural Q. Stormwater and Geotechnical Analysis R. Stormwater Checklist S. City Engineer's Letter, dated 7/5/17 T. Response Letter 7/18/17 Z. Conditions of Approval — Planning Commission Z(AIt). Conditions of Approval — Staff report to Planning Commission 12 City Council Agenda — 07/24/2017 EXHIBIT Z Camping World PUD 3801, 3887 Chelsea Road Lot 1, Block 1 Camping World First Addition Lot 1, Block 1, Maas Addition AS RECOMMENDED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION 1. Meet the architectural materials requirements of the pylon sign standards. 2. Enforce the requirements for monument sign relocation at 3810 Chelsea Road, by moving the sign out of the right of way; or if location is approved by the City, the applicant shall enter into a license agreement for the encroachment. 3. Provide curbing around the entire paved area, consistent with the requirements of the zoning ordinance. 4. Revise landscaping plan to provide quantity and species for proposed landscaping along south portion of the site. (Applicant has provided this information.) 5. Provide materials and height detail for proposed ornamental fence. (Applicant has provided this information.) 6. Accommodate the proposed flagpole height of 130 feet. 7. Locate the flagpole at a distance from the east and north property line a distance of 30' 8. Demonstrate FAA review and approval for flagpole as required. 9. Upgrade the existing buildings with exterior architectural treatments to meet/exceed the requirements for commercial buildings and construct a fence or wall around the east and south boundaries of the east parcel, with landscaping on east and south sides to create an attractive visual screen, and which focuses traffic and attention to the main property (3801 Chelsea). 10. Revise site and building plans to illustrate consistency in proposed improvements. 11. Comply with the comments of the City Engineer per the checklist included with the staff report of July 11th, 2017. 12. Verification by staff of the proper utility services and location/circulation improvements and compliance with staff recommendations related to the proposed dump stations, to be included in the Final Stage plans and approval. (Added condition for Council consideration.) 13 City Council Agenda — 07/24/2017 13. Applicant shall enter into a development agreement for the proposed planned unit development. EXHIBIT Z Camping World PUD 3801, 3887 Chelsea Road Lot 1, Block 1 Camping World First Addition Lot 1, Block 1, Maas Addition AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION 1. Meet the architectural materials requirements of the pylon sign standards. 2. Enforce the requirements for monument sign relocation at 3810 Chelsea Road, by moving the sign out of the right of way; or if location is approved by the City, the applicant shall enter into a license agreement for the encroachment. 3. Provide curbing around the entire paved area, consistent with the requirements of the zoning ordinance. 4. Revise landscaping plan to provide quantity and species for proposed landscaping along south portion of the site. (Applicant has provided this information.) 5. Provide materials and height detail for proposed ornamental fence. (Applicant has provided this information.) 6. Adhere to the maximum flagpole height of 55 feet. 7. Locate the flagpole at a distance from the east and north property line a distance of 30' 8. Demonstrate FAA review and approval for flagpole as required. 9. a. Remove and replace the existing buildings with a building of conforming size to the standards for vehicle sales lots; or b. Upgrade the existing buildings with exterior architectural treatments to meet/exceed the requirements for commercial buildings; or c. Construct a fence or wall around the east and south boundaries of the east parcel, with landscaping on east and south sides to create an attractive visual screen, and which focuses traffic and attention to the main property (3801 Chelsea). 14 City Council Agenda — 07/24/2017 10. Revise site and building plans to illustrate consistency in proposed improvements. 11. Comply with the comments of the City Engineer per the checklist included with the staff report of July 11th, 2017. 12. Verification by staff of the proper utility services and location/circulation improvements and compliance with staff recommendations related to the proposed dump stations, to be included in the Final Stage plans and approval. (Added condition for Council consideration.) 13. Applicant shall enter into a development agreement for the proposed planned unit development. 15 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2017-016 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A REZONING AND DEVELOPMENT STAGE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR LOT 1, BLOCK 1, CAMPING WORLD FIRST ADDITION, TOGETHER WITH LOT 1, BLOCK 1, MAAS ADDITION WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted a request to rezone its property along Chelsea Road, legally described as Lot 1, Block 1 Camping World First Addition, together with Lot 1, Block 1 Maas Addition, from B-3, Highway Business to PUD, Planned Unit Development District; and WHEREAS, the applicant concurrently proposes to develop the property for retail recreational vehicle sales and service and related accessory uses; and WHEREAS, the site is guided for commercial uses under the label "Places to Shop" in the City's Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the proposed PUD is consistent with the long-term use and development of the property for commercial uses; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on April 4, 2017 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: 1. The PUD provides an appropriate means of furthering the intent of the Comprehensive Plan for the site. 2. The use of the site for retail vehicle sales, display and service is consistent with the direction of the Comprehensive Plan for "Places to Shop". 3. The plan, through PUD, results in a project that more closely achieves the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan than would the application of the standard zoning regulations. 4. The plan results in development that is compatible and consistent with the existing surrounding land uses in the area. 5. The improvements proposed for the site under the Development Stage PUD are consistent with the intent of the zoning ordinance. 6. The improvements will have impacts on public services, including sewer, water, stormwater treatment, and traffic which have been planned to serve the property for the development as proposed. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2017-016 7. The PUD flexibility for the project, including site coverage, building materials, display, and signage, are consistent with the intent of the City's economic development objectives, as well as with the intent of the PUD zoning regulations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, that the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the Monticello City Council approves the Rezoning and Development Stage PUD, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit Z as follows: 1. Meet the architectural materials requirements of the pylon sign standards. 2. Enforce the requirements for monument sign relocation at 3810 Chelsea Road, by moving the sign out of the right of way; or if location is approved by the City, the applicant shall enter into a license agreement for the encroachment. 3. Provide curbing around the entire paved area, consistent with the requirements of the zoning ordinance. 4. Revise landscaping plan to provide quantity and species for proposed landscaping along south portion of the site. 5. Provide materials and height detail for proposed ornamental fence. 6. Locate the flagpole at a distance from the east and north property line a distance of 30' 7. Demonstrate FAA review and approval for flagpole as required. 8. Upgrade the existing buildings with exterior architectural treatments to meet/exceed the requirements for commercial buildings and construct a fence or wall around the east and south boundaries of the east parcel, with landscaping on east and south sides to create an attractive visual screen, and which focuses traffic and attention to the main property (3 801 Chelsea). 9. Revise site and building plans to illustrate consistency in proposed improvements. 10. Comply with the comments of the City Engineer per the checklist included with the staff report of July 11th, 2017. 11. Applicant shall enter into a development agreement for the proposed planned unit development. K CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2017-016 ADOPTED this 11th day of July, 2017, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION Ra ATTEST: Brad Fyle, Chair Angela Schumann, Community Development Director 3 ORDINANCE NO. 663 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 10 OF THE MONTICELLO CITY CODE, KNOWN AS THE ZONING ORDINANCE, BY ESTABLISHING THE CAMPING WORLD PUD AS A ZONING DISTRICT IN THE CITY OF MONTICELLO, AND REZONING THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY FROM B-3, HIGHWAY BUSINESS DISTRICT TO CAMPING WORLD PUD, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: LOT 1, BLOCK 1, CAMPING WORLD FIRS.' ADDITION, TOGETHER WITH LOT 1, BLOCK 1, MAAS ADDITION I THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO HEREBY ORDAINS: i Section 1. Section 2.4(P) — Planned Unit Developments, Title 10 — Zoning Ordinance is hereby amended by adding the following: (XX) Camping World PUD Distr ' (a) Purpose. The purpose of the Camping World PUD District is to provide for the development of certain real estate subject to the District for vehicle sales, service, and display commercial land uses. (b) Permitted Uses. Permitted pri ' uses A the Camping World PUD District shall be vehicle sales, disp-WWnd vehicle service and repair — ImVinor and major, as found in the B-3, Highway Business District of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance, subject to the approved Final Stage Development Platis dated , and development agreement dated , 2017, as may be amended. The introduction of any other use from any district, including Conditional Uses in the B-3 District, shall be reviewed under the requirements of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 2, Section (0) — Planned Unit Developments for Development Stage PUD and Final Stage PUD. (c) Accessory Uses. Accessory uses shall be those commonly accessory and incidental to retail uses, and as specifically identified by the approved final stage PUD plans. Accessory buildings on the site may be utilized for indoor uses for enterprises of commercial tenants which are identified as permitted principal uses in the B-3, Highway Business District. (d) District Performance Standards. Performance standards for the development of any lot in the Camping World PUD District shall adhere to the approved final stage PUD plans and development agreement. In such case where any proposed improvement is not addressed by the final stage PUD, then the regulations of the B-3, Highway Business District shall apply. ORDINANCE NO. 663 (e) Amendments. Where changes to the PUD are proposed in the manner of use, density, site plan, development layout, building size, mass, or coverage, or any other change, the proposer shall apply for an amendment to the PUD under the terms of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance, Section 2.4 (P)(10). The City may require that substantial changes in overall use of the PUD property be processed as a new project, including a zoning district amendment. Section 2. The zoning map of the City of Monticello is hereby amendment to rezoned the following described parcels from B-3, Highway Business District to Camping World PUD, Planned Unit Development District: Section 3 Section 4 Lot 1, Block 1, Camping World First Addition, and Lot 1, Block 1, Maas Addition. 4 The City Clerk is hereby directed to mark the official'q ordinance. The map shall not be republished at this time. map to reflect this The City Clerk is hereby directed to make the changes required Whis Ordinance as part of the Official Monticello City Code, Title 10, Zoning Ordinance, and to renumber the tables and chapters accordingly as necessary to provide the intended effect of this Ordinance. The City Clerk is further directed to make necessary corrections to any internal*ktations that result from, said renumbering process, provided that such changes retain the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance as has been adopted. Section 5. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage and publication. The ordiA%ce in its entirety and map shall be posted on the City website after publication. Copies of the complete Ordinance and map are available online and at Monticelis'City Hall for examination upon request. ADOPTED BY the ATTEST: Jeff O'Neill, Administrator Coun it this 24th day of July, 2017. Brian Stumpf, Mayor 2 ORDINANCE NO. 663 AYES: NAYS: FRHP Lincolnshire, LLC.- Request for Rezoning to Planned Unit Development (PUD) & Develop Stage PUD Lt 1, Blk 1 Maas Add n; Lt 1, Blk 1 Camping World First Add I PID 155-225-001010; 155-243-001010 Created by: City of Monticello yzavx, VAN& Revised —July 18, 2017 Ms. Angela Schumann Community Development Director 505 Walnut Street Monticello, MN 55362 Re: Camping World — PUD Application Narrative — Lot 1, Block 1 Maas Addition, PID 155-225-001010 I Lot 1, Block 1 Camping World First Addition, PID 155-243-001010 Camping World has purchased the Bedrock Motors site on the south side of the freeway at 3887 Chelsea Road in Monticello, MN. The applicant has applied for this PUD to clarify the use of the property and to seek approval of various elements necessary to their business that either exceed or vary from the current zoning regulations. They desire to increase the paved area, install additional storm water infrastructure utilizing underground infiltration, install additional site lighting to match the existing on the site, install new graphics to an existing monument sign at Chelsea Road, install a new 130' flag pole and install a new 32' tall 200 sq ft pylon sign which will replace an existing pylon sign in the same location. They also intend to add a combination of both chain link and ornamental iron fencing to surround the site, including gates at all existing remaining entrances. They also intend to add an access across the property line to their adjacent property at the NW corner of the parcel. They also have submitted a landscape plan for review. They have submitted a land use application. The paving plan exceeds the current allowable impervious area. This deviation is necessary for the applicant to increase their ability to have more inventory available for sale. Increased inventory will directly impact the applicant's ability and need to add additional jobs in the community. The grading and construction plans for the site illustrate the new storm water infrastructure, paving and curbing proposed for the parcel. All newly paved areas will include curb and gutter to comply with city code. The plan also indicates closing the access and removing the curb cut at the SE corner of the parcel. They are looking at options to change the exterior of the existing building to comply with city zoning requirements. Camping World is also submitting site plans with waste water dump stations for RV dumping. These will be contained in tanks and pumped into truck when full. They will not be connected to the city sewer system. Additional landscaping is planned along the fence line adjacent to Chelsea Road. The applicant does not anticipate any platting associated with this application. It is their intention to maintain these as separate parcels. The existing buildings at 3887 Chelsea Road (former Bedrock Motors) are being used for pre -delivery inspections and for detailing; little customer traffic is anticipated in this area. The existing building at 3801 Chelsea Road will continue to be the primary customer destination. There is no screening for trash containers planned or anticipated on the parcel at 3887 Chelsea Road (former Bedrock Motors). All trash generated at this location is deposited in containers at the main location on the adjacent property. The new pylon sign proposed does comply with the city code. Several items that are within the Project Narrative requirements do not apply to this project as it is not a development project. Those items include: (1) whether the applicant will be the builder or if the land will be sold to other builders (2) Phasing (3) Plans or documents for Homeowner's Association (4) Possible negative impacts to surrounding property and mitigation measures, and (5) A statement of the proposed use of the lots, stating type of residential buildings with number of proposed dwelling units and type of business or industry to reveal the effect of development on traffic, fire hazards, etc. We acknowledge that there may be additional fees from the City of Monticello such as trunk charges, landscape security deposits, sign permits, etc. Contacts for this project are as follows: Owner: Camping World and Good Sam Melissa Nance Director of RE and Development 250 Parkway Drive, Suite 270 Lincolnshire, IL 60069 847-229-6755 Local Representative: Kinghorn Company 21830 Industrial Court Rogers, MN 55374 763-428-8088 Civil Engineer: Hakanson Anderson Charles Christopherson 3601 Thurston Avenue Anoka, MN 55303 763-427-5860 in tD O \ U to U �j \ rn to M / \ w LLJ t *ficate of Surve z Z Y W Z Cer /t'�' Q � CB k 9 3: �\°�OP \ \ / \�s5s.1s \\ 0 Y ° 10' 9 LLJ _1 LLJ to Q w 0 (D Q J O��'`\ 9h9 % ,\ is . y0p ! \ ,t D D U m M N 0 L_ \\����� 0' / / \ - - - F \ 959.18 \ / H1/0 \/ �p�� o / IL \ \ \ X49 -70 ���' / \ — — n \ /RF, \ 0 369 / z J++V / \ J 957 - �\ /n sss /6 \ \ SSol. N°rth � /� � l � � / O) �,`'^/ameOster/ w _1\\ 6" / /' \ / 90Ty //ne V //'fir, m / /�'///'�/Propane Tank -,y �\STRFfcc/- > W V / V Won. i 15 (HDPE CCB 15" HDPE `\ `; \ \ \ ���0 \ FT 2� k � 4° l a B / / RE=956.09 / / O �00/TO� �\ `tel N RE=956.11/ I o / \ � 84 :, \ \ I � 01 \I - Oxy' CO <' ,< / / — — — / �I \ F ss, "' s:ss�"':' • of �as Dai - \j ..• e �1�/ V \ amen °9e \ / / / \ T �, \J V� .. \ oFF�g e� / �IRFFT per 957.9 /1 T I \ T r- I-- T \ ?`' •i: ::.: S, l t lMH ( 0 Q� °� /� ` / (\ \ \J I �I r -) - - �' 1.4 ,2 . PIU 2N0 at ° f� / - Chainlink Fence ���0 /96 / \ \ ahs I n\?` I u �i I I \\ I \ L_ L_ I �`o ^ ''`u:: / [�DDITj\Ty-- /\\ s" ` J / CB / I CB 1 j �rn /�h oFF\gs? � / I RE=956.03 / RE=956.08c�� of , ° ,'.:':'• / / II r \ ` ` \ _ \,� g 46 X �'.13 , P/ / `\ Draina e & Utilit /Easement per \ 1 �/ \ �\ T /1 I\ I s +'•s h / 1 _ _ 6 \ / / �� / / \play of-9frT1� STREET 2ND ADDITION \ ` \ \ j I \1� /-\ LJ LJ I I �/ I V ss�s� .:..�= ": / I I \ g57��2?� a\6.Q0369 NOrthe°st 1j( -South line of Block 1, Lot 1, oFF� ti< / / / /Q4 140" �° er/ n / ,; + Existing Building ss, r: `, .:...Y / / I / I\ 2 I �# t /y44,4,4" e ei J rn / 90TH STREET 2ND ADDITION ;: m:'sw� s a // gs 3801 Chelsea Rd. W 8 .: ,:, / I / \ \ \ AO °ck ,k �c `�- _ ^� s\ -- 146.1 -o- /- - O na957 \ �\�'��� \ --�—-------------- `D I `...-- — s per ge & ��iL, S75.22'20"E_ - - - - - _ - - - - ^ Elec . \8 syn n h I I ohi ri 1 \ \ 56 `� \ \ _ plat 0 f V tlllty / _ s' i :l / North line of Bloc 1, Lot 1,- \ \ x Cabinets /j ' • / \ \ o _ �_ // \ \ /WAAs ��� 4,70 2 •O �/ 90TH STREET 3 D ADDITION I —� \� \ \ qpDI Ont _Sfr 95y55 \I /I, r;• San M U oc I \ \ - \ N s �� �O G I I— 7 o' �� - - /� 6 �HZ Jii s£:;i:•'M ✓'':..: t; t RS 9`�4.3� \\\\ \ \\_ \ c ' \ / 1 T 1 I / T D T Q r \ i , I_) / =)F� A nnITIr\N 1 I s wo �,0 :.• � ;: � p I I \\ �\ lJ r /—\ I 5, ��.-, ,r` r... Is I I1j_PUR'` ' �_ }.: �';.�.� \ 6 m l' I g 12 B • 1�F°--, .e4R r ` %%\� 5 I 0 ( %. \ I I 22 2p»w sss \ \� \ " 4 V Off' 1`\ I 17'_� �)�- I o \\ �� 4 - " Z 1 8 n 1 i ' �. • /��'' ^ : ry : M` "� fa 955.50 \ \ �/ \ \ \ 1 N �� - FES J 0 / I CB ro n , •� / RE=954.96 i 1-1T. - - \ \ \ ^ _f2 �I RE=955.00 '�' i' \ G O IE=950.79 h /� :% �� / :..:.,� �• I\ \� \ I // \ \I rn \k 6� \\,\i/ / I C/ I \ 4I ^• Q •) j':,i• / :✓;'• �0 �0 \ rn �954.ss D o I o h %� \ / I` r SO ��� v r �� - m R) g J /rn \ ''•• s / -6 � - F \ SB B2 � thwe s4'' sso e�R \\ ( I \I \ \ 0 4� • .r :: "•:' • / o _ J p \ I\ 6 °° Q aci 0 \ I\ A A A \ / i STR� / ster/ �,y °��\ �' J \ 0 w 1 \ .,':�'' ; .. / V Q \ I rn \ Q 0 ~ \I V I W sa':: :' m in E / FT3<ot; /�� g \ \\ ` ��,..•., �/ �o n \cn ao \ V/ e6„ RO o \ r� \ , � — / / 0 z L051 0 , W Q \ a zo I I = 110O/TOf I \ \ I \\ �J\' \\ o ~ N m 'rn gs, / / ss8.s2 / m � � p ` S Co \ I I a / _ —N \ �S W� I 8 y m \ / THH pWI Q \ �o I I Storm MH D T\ I __ \ � o a / 0 I \ /\ I� I� I T I /1 I\ w Q 112 - - —958- \ \• \ is O I m \ / W O D : \ 6 D RE=957.81 Stor rn 6� \ \ , i� Q. \ J 1 9 - /J 0 \ U) L - o \ �Or 56 Stn / \UU� I ��/I V T I R \ >�/ p/at 0°9e / / I _ \��� / w U) F- I •IN a o \ Q I 1 C San MH 00 , cy 1 \ �/ f 90& / ?Y \ / / o \ _ O O :- I ° a mss D � I I 1 / RE=957.49 D -- \ T/y t//t / l� y / \ / _ \ w O O a 6� _ 46 - - - ce ?.:, S \RF ^ e�R \ \ ce STR�\ °se / / m I J� / \ \ 9�y \ \ I '` 1 Z I L _ _ _ ` ° I q — RE=�6�f1 S �� 956.6 \JF� �\ ,9S , T 3R eht / / 2 A / ? X \ / \/ \ I I o Q SBB3x ,^/ — \ S Stor \358\ O pe 0��6C \ _ ° a ,g56 � RF\ � I 190 rya e- N /g,.R �s M1 T9 \y\ O/"10i�, l �/ a1. s \ \ // y // \III\ 1 1 T_r/ �\ ^� Q\ \ St \ / / i / i� CB \ / i9 \ I Axl I 956.4.3 1�- - - - - - �l , \ \ R ori \ / EI Y RE=953.10 / \ 1l � 11jo SSSS��� SB B-4 F�e�R G J RF S MyIO 1�\s\s20m/� 2 \L \ \\ I /' I / /��----X957- San MH \\ \ 40D 2Q„ 111 SSA Qom/ V\\� I / \\ Q'i954� v RE=956.13 S F° 2 R \ 49 mJ \ I CB' I I / \ I / \ G O �_ (/\ C° \ \"�._ RE -952.37 I I IIH II 1 I \ I 8 _O O / Del ' /\CB 952.65 I I 8 I \ / I i / / P -BUR m Q \�- F ,� 24 6" 6„ \\ I 1 I I / _—_------ ----\ ?-BUR 0(n I w \9535 \ \ \ \\ V I I I I I 1 / Gas Meter -� (� /-A /C ?- 1 c Q 6 Son D \ / I Elec. Meter - � < Storm MH RE -954. \ `BG _ V / I I 1 I I A/C 05URElec. Meter \ — � 954.65 G S 4.38 \ R �� \ / I W — FOS@U 0 ' _ ' I 1 I o o \ tno / V / II I / / P-BUR/A 4.? `";' \9S, 1 `� IE=949.45 / \ \ 9d) � I 51 m n 0 +. FES \ of age N / 1 1 i Existing Building �, t \ _ I1 �9 s.. w y STRFY� Fas 955_ -- � rm- I I FFE=958.04 u� o - ----- 87.0 � _ O 1 � V / rn 114.3 I O V '�( _ I y O 3 \1 16"L : Storm MH / I r - - - ° o`er^ CB 4VR - J �- - 1 RE 356 &8 - - - I - - - - - - - 95�,� \ r .: • E=956.05 1 s\aD I'/ \� \ 3887 Chelsea Rd. W :M vale MH I I — J SRF 9My 7� \ I 12\ V \ _ - - - RE=956.41i� Sc, \ 56 95,> CV CB San MH I \ \ - _957- - J 1 / F\ �/ \ N RE=956.52 I 9 thw " �\ I I \ �� sa, o V 1 / est ss6 �9 �. / 9 er/y 6 t D '�� ��� o' r Elec. Meter o, Ty STR °f 6 \ sss ,•�� ADO m \ Jh \ \\N.,\ iFT O° \ �r , Il 2ti k \ N / Cg Ren M� -�� 4" \ \ Perinp/ e `� utlllt 03 / / e e } 0 f AIA y Eos cn FFE= I S �cP Post` o u� \ \198 e`r en N /I \ V ON, _ a \ Jn) I o \ 4" � \ #\ _ 19D0/TION �1 Existing Buildin •':.� 83.3__ D \� 4" Fence Post � /I 958.26 1/ r--- r m \ \ \ \ \ Storm Fence Post \ \ � r Fence Post FFE= 96gcc ed r ^ / F0, an DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: gs'� RE,95j22 36 B"R 4 / IV / . S,`5 24, » >> F0, �cwi \ \ / �- Gas Meter Landscaped - 'p t " \ 956 4 3 %9 49 E BUR 4„ \ l� Areo w/ sign / 6 The part of Lot 1, Block 1, 90th Street 3rd Addition, which lies s \ \ \ ` — —sss>� /N \ S / 441, 40 00 \ \ \ 12 I northeaster) of vacated Chelsea Court as dedicated in 90th Street — 95a _ \ \ Z_ MH_ 36 \\ y —\ 441. 4" \\/ zl 5524,49„ \ \ \ c0 � Addition, Wright County, Minnesota. — _ _ _ / D X3,24,.`36— — — / \farm MH / / 1112 I c ` j� Storm , 49 E o95j'40 m / ,l �P ` 1 \ O AND \ \ 960.18 \ \ - - / �\RE�95 8g , 2„ s \ \ \ N \ \ TNH — 958 �\�� ' ,) - - t 95� N�grO MOC) \� \ \ \ O I Lot 1, Block 1, 90th Street 2nd Addition, except that part platted as � Oq n9S 36'36" Rcp / Fence Post F R Fe.�e�Post \ \ /8.1,9 90th Street 3rd Addition, Wright County, Minnesota. \ / S \ \ \ REX95 \ \ ,J \ \ S � n MN A42 \ AND \ °uthwe hE1951, ,% 9Sd 36" J R 1886 I Lot line i \ Storm MH RCP SEE DETAIL d� >>OQ \ \ \ \ , That part of Lot 1, Block 1, 90th Street 3rd Addition, Wright County, \ /' MAgs f B/ock /\ y ' _ — \� RE I �/ 0 3I Minnesota, according to the recorded plat thereof, lying Southwesterly \ q�0/T/ON of the Northeasterly line of Chelsea Court as depicted on the record ao \ 958 80 DETAIL 11%_ 14 -plat of 90th Street Addition, said Wright County, Minnesota. TNH / NOT TO SCALE N N I \ R� s AND \ �s�2s 2010 1 Lot 1, Block 1, Maas Addition, Wright County, Minnesota. RL718.8600 \ X1.31'18" \ w Q 0 NOTES: u ° E O The underground utilities shown have been located o a _0 L from visible evidence, field markings per Gopher State 0.40 0 O One Call Ticket No. 162571745, 170450252 and �; E (>Dc°n; 170450253 and available mapping. The surveyor makes 0L o z a no guarantees that the underground utilities shown ° — to .S comprise all such utilities in the area, either in service o o or abandoned. The surveyor further does not warrant E �'8 U t T" J ° O that the underground utilities shown are in the exact -0 _0 location indicated although he does certify that they -oo o a N are located as accurately as possible from information �' ° o cin • o w available. The surveyor has not physically located the T a o �, L underground utilities. Prior to any excavation, contact o Gopher State One Call for an on—site location ° L ° U z (651-454-0002). U o aQ_ o 3 (D 3 The professional surveyor has made no Q) L U) 0 investigation or independent search for a �' °; ° ° easements of record, encumbrance, restrictive — �' -0 _j� covenants, ownership title evidence, or any other facts that an accurate and current title search may disclose. Area of combined property is 633,409 sq. ft. orO O o 14.54 acres. Lo to oN LOLo This lot is in Section 10 Township 121 Range 25 p ° I Benchmarks; ? ' MnDot "Monticello MRC RM1" — Elevation= 958.82 to MnDot "8605 T" — Elevation=951.19 "1 -a � o OIX c p U J o< U cw 0 0 NwooLc 3 � >W3: a00 C L LLJ O I - O � >_ M 04 U F- I . . " V)M (D O 50 0 50 100 SCALE IN FEET SHEET NUMBER 1 (3 z z 0 tr w 0 z Q z 0 In z a N Al LEGEND • = Iron monument found O = Iron monument set and marked with license No. 18420. x 800.0 = Denotes existing elevation soo.o = Denotes proposed elevation from grade or development plan = Denotes drainage & utility easement �— = Denotes drainage arrow ® = Denotes offset iron Bearings shown are assumed —800.0--'= Denotes proposed contour from development or grading plan X�7711 V/ 00. = Denotes as—built elevation — SF— = Proposed Silt Fence i A = Denotes soil boring (by others) V1 0 2 0 O �+ b.0 4--i 41 -� t T GOPHER STATE (� ONE. ' GALL - CALL BEFORE YOU DIG 4-4 6fi1a6F-0Cp2 • Aytro780a252-r rba Greab MH 41 SHEET NUMBER 1 (3 z z 0 tr w 0 z Q z 0 In z a N Al L------955-------- /� /f-------� ---- --'�---------�----------o----------�----------�---------�•---------- -955-------0---------�' ' .e \ 1 956------- 1 ---- \ \ �957---------------------------------------------------------- - -----------q57-------- /• _J �Ig ---------------- ` _ 957----------- �'957- \ ------------- \ I `\ ss_---------------------------------------------------------- \ a --------956------ • I I 1 I \ \ --------------- I 1 \ \\ X956_ _----------- \ LO rn----------------- ---------------955---- 1 \ \ h .• I c I SAWCUT AND REMOVE CONCRETE 11 ►+ E.O.F. CURB �' — A� 1 \ m " 955.7 1 I If\ > 1 1 \ 1 1 1 1 _ 4� 1 \\\ 1 1 1� ♦ 6 -01 95 I 111 I \ 5 \ 955.50 SB 68 II\ ♦ II° \ \ rn u\ °, �\\ SB B7 .ou, 1 I ♦ Ia\ \ 1 If A • �• I \\ • e ° 15 I •/ I \ t I I Ill ��I A10%\\ ---� iii L iii v ���\ `\ \ \ \ ,I ♦ �\�\� \ / \\ ` e 1 i/i iii �\ \ \ \`� �� ♦ � rn `9So ��� i� 0 I ill ° ° \ s \ __-- \ \\ / +. h \ \ �� __— \ \ \\\ \s \u\ \ I \\9S ----------------------- /G ♦ \\\ V / $F�p7 I \ \ \ B ♦ \ \\\ \ rn \\ i \ 100 , m \\\\ \ \\ I / �'/ e • / \ \ 1 I Imo' W\ \\ \\\ 1 � 956.43 a \\\ \ SB B10 S8B9G ♦40 40 / \\`o\ \ go 4000 "OIL DRAINAGE AND --- ��•� �,R/ ��\\►` -��/ 40 / \ \ UTILITY EASEMENT ------957- 40 10 1 ` 40 (TYP.) \ REMOVE - \ BITUMINOUS `\ 1 PAVEMENT �. _ � \\ 1 (TYP.) �,� �1�I'- Oos Meter ��C. 1� \ 1 \,, ter0111 z / ate-. `\\ 1 � / ♦ �� e' ♦♦ / \ \ 1 I v \\\ e \ \ \ I \ ♦ ♦° "-810 \ \ I \ \ I ♦ ♦ r -BUR _ / \ \ I\ `\ 1 \ \\ \\ \\ ♦ ; ♦\ �g5g �° F — _�_ I ` 1 rn 1 1 I 1 I \\\\\ \ \ \ / I ♦ d �� ,O�j 7�3 _ _ _ ' / \ T -BUR T -BUR 1 \`\\ 1 1 I CB 952137 82 OEDi I 1 I `\`\\ \ \ \ \ �I/ ♦ � \\ II ECSC �� a' I 1 \� \ \\ \ \\ / � I // ♦ / i' • �E 956g5� 90 \ ce 65 I I I \ ♦ / ♦ \ / \E �5 , 1 \ \ R -1;)y 60 I 1 I \ 1 / ♦ ♦ �� ' e S / \ \\` I 1 �(\�'94a I 1 I \7\\1 \\ tom, /' ♦ ♦ �'/ / ��\ I� 1\ \ / / 1 I ; \ 1 \ ♦ ♦ ♦ 1 `k\ I \ \\ ,�' I ;\\I \\ ♦ /// SAWCUT ♦ ♦ \�----- -- \`\ I \ \ I `; 1 \ ♦ / BITUMINOUS ♦ ♦ \ $ \ \ / I , \ ♦ PAVEMENT ♦ d /\ 1�\\ ♦ \ 1 1 \a\I \\\ ♦ (—V ---958----------i'' e, I �� v / I a ♦ 958' �\ ♦ \ e 0% ° —955-------- �— / \1 P\ ♦ ��'�/ ♦ \\\ II E\eeer \ �s� Eft/ •\ 1 A \\\ 11 J/ \`\\ \ ♦ ♦ \ ♦ 1 I \ \` \ 1 �j I / 1 \ \ ♦ 8001 Cn ♦ ♦ \ \ 1 reo I \ \\\ \ rn \\ I I I u `�_;; Storm MN a � � // `\\\ \\ ; ♦ ; ya 26 �o asooQ •12 i e� I\`W 9 Ln v g56 6 - ♦ ♦ g a� \ I ` \ 1 \ S. 0 _ _ J RE 4, 6a \ ; \ ♦ ♦ ♦ fE, / 1 I I \;\\_I\ Lf) `- - - - \E� ,947 50 - _ m 1 ♦ ♦ / o SooP e \ I A I=R----------- - — — — _ \- 5� — — //�i \�� \ U\ `iD 1\`1 \ 1 \ ♦ ♦ ♦ / J I 16 =- �-- III III o 1 51 f6 ---- - 9 Storm MH �___=--_ _'-- iii ul �'cn ,-;�,� 11 ♦ / / —� `-- R$5� ♦ Meter IEN_ --_ D -__>_ ___-----_-----------�' iii II� Cos - Storm5M90 71656'aa / M A / 95223 ---�-------------- 11 RE g 49g00 .9\ hyo 1 690 / � -'- ���� \.SCCS =946.77 8 \�., � --� ----' iii Illi ,> I1iS)�2288 �v\\\ v ii un'ost-. ce post \ fence post // E g4g.2 MN o, Ce s >> �� (Sw) 94� cN / Illl a, fence p fen . , \E (,5Ei 0 o1_g57.17 1 1 , r L(� I EiNW _ 6.7� _ - - - - ' Iii - - - - - - f 4 4I I �4 REQ S' � 946.1 I IIS 4" \ d..47 I I I g \\ US\ness III I \ BUR FO -BUR " t01 _- FO -BUR FO -BUR FO -BUR FG- \— 4\ \ — FO -BUR �-PO-BUR FO -BUR FO -BUR F �UR FO -BUR ` R 0 -BUR FO -BUR FO -BUR _FD-BtlR i FD R FO -BUR �\ ,> - - - vIE_gs' S13 \ B 5\9n f11 \ _ \ e post / �vv 95� enc�jpost / pi/ CB 42 O� \\ REn MH `___ - //li I _ fen'' o/ ^C v� CLEAR_ AND" F f RE�(355. g5 62 -956.18 > --- _- i/ 1 - - - _ --__= —�-_ *s� vo __----- �-.^!L------ Jl-� _____ _ '/jY-----------------\,\� �w ---------------___-------_-�,..-='I'====__________----__,w�`s��c��o----------------� - ----------------------- _ ___ ______ ______ ____ ______ _ -------_ W \ > » » » --- ----------------------------J-----------------�------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------- -------------------------------- - --- ' GR�C1B TREE � .. -. � \E _'i```` �\ I > 36' RCP ----»- D »» » » » » �- ',> » ,>\ D Storm MH » » �\� \\�, Stor H \ RE=953.88 » » > » » » Q \ I '' \ IE (N)=948.78 �\ 36" RCP \ RE=9 63 N, \ > RE=9571.22 36" RCP 58 \ B ` 3�" R ��--, � � a San MH \ � 9S IE (S)=950.88 � $raiM 956 \ a RE 957 03' _ JE-,('W/E)=944.18 S� \ \ v IE (N)=948.73 > \ , I —� > IE(NW)=945.17 9 CHELSEA ROAD IE (S)=948.48 g IE W E 942.73 ~ E �x� \ N ^ I \ \ 5 > > �,V�)-j343.vc > > > _ > > > > >) > > > ^ > > > �. ( / )_ > N ` ` ``i\ NEE 956.08 I \\�I-,\\\/�/ A 0 0 _ 2.58 1,1 SAWCUT AND REMOVE CONCRETE CURB 0 n DATE REVISION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was DESIGNED BY: ��� 4 7/17 PLAN REVISIONS PER CITY REVIEW prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I TAE H a k a n s o n Anderson Q 4/26/17 PLAN REVISIONS PER CLIENT REVIEW of a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws CAMPING WORLD EAST 6 15 17 PLAN REVISIONS PER CLIENT REVIEW of the state of Mi ,ta. DRAWN BY: Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors 0-) �I 717/17 PLAN REVISIONS PER CLIENT REVIEW TAE 3601 Thurston Ave., Anoka, Minnesota 55303 PARKING LOT EXPANSION j 7/18/17 REVISED TOTAL SHEETS I UI Y A. CHECKED BY: 763-427-5860 FAX 763-427-0520 Date 3/6/17 Lic. No. 43362 CJJ www.hakanson-anderson.com GENERAL NOTES: 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE REMOVAL OF UTILITIES AND LIGHTING AS NEEDED. 30 0 30 60 SCALE IN FEET EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY AND REMOVALS PLAN CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA SHEET C1 C8 SHEETS 3395.05 \ / _ 0 J GL= GL=957.77 \ / \ 955.38 I -(END CURB) Aak \ I / GL= - --957--------- - \\ I \\--------- \ I 954.72 I s I I / \ \ \ \ GL=957.70 I I \ 0 Pol I i I/GL=954.05 \ \ J (BEGIN CURB) (MATCH �I I EXISTING) 9 1 \ \\ \ � ------------------- - - - - - - - I GL=954.39 \\\ \\ ___ s6' GL=956.87 ----- m __- I-- - --- II GL= j \\�� ss GL=956.18 - .• 953.861 \\� GL= 954.06 , I j 11\GL=953.42 , '• ° I\ I - (MATCH m \\ I tz GL=957.14 STOR \ j \ EXISTING) GL= GL=955.28 956.33 CRAM GW° \ I \ SHEET LO I \ ' L ,�, I > 1 - 011 UO) LoI\ \ �\ \\ rn .f - g5 57 3 \ I -> 1 y01 \ `\ 1 a 9 I III Ilk II s \ \ \ �s o 955.50 SB B7 JA III A 95-7 I �\\ \ _ - \\\ \ /4 , e I 11 ° \ 111- 0 \ \ \ III \ ln\ / i' v \ \ to \ \ - / L 4i j "k I i ° ° E.O.F. \ S 955.3 % CBI R0�9 o/11 � \E�s� 95016 V / i - ���NEi' e /OFpo\e ii i `\ \\ \ 1 BIT= I i • / ;` \ 957.1 e • iii / `h\ I p \ - 100 -YEAR 956.33 954.35 \\l \ s6 Bs HWL=955.3 - \ 1\ \k\, \ `n �I 01 � \ �;,kk \ V \\ / w \ \` / 0111 T \ \ / - 12 \ I 1 ' V \\ \ � I �1 // I \ \ I J,Ikl Ilk I I ce 131 I 1 I I\ \\ II ElN�5 gg a `P`OCOEOi I 1 1 \ Ilk \ \ CB 2 65 \ \ RE,9g4515 I 1 1 \ \ GL=956.42 // B612 CONCRETE CURB \\\� Ji \\ \\\ //' AND GUTTER PER MN/DOT -------------- I U') \`;,1 \ STANDARD PLATE 7100 `k\\ \ / l\`\ --- r ---- -955-------- o -�. / \\\, \ � ----- n / `I\\ 6 PROPOSED FLAG POLE ------------�---------�---------�-955-------0---------�' / /i--------� .e A ,_-95 111 y --------956------- Ilk ---955-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 9g� - N GL= \\ 956.24 \ G \\�\ 1 `1\\ r r / MTECH SC -740 I END GL=95CURB)3 \\� m 1,\\ // E.O.F. BER SYSTEM. SEE 956 i ( 1\\ �;`` 956.5 S C5-C7 FOR LS. t� I 1 954.69 1 S8 Bs 1 1 \`\\`\ I °\ 955 1 \ \`„\ / - 1 W I \ co BIT= ® 100 -YEAR 956.70 \\ HWL=955.3 \ \ i;;\ \ BIT= \ / \ 954.18 955 9S6, ---------- v \` \ `0 4 BIT= 956.43 0 a \\`"\ \ \ SB B10 956.39 a-� \ \ \ Ilk BIT= 956.78 � i vV Ilk Meter•e ec Meter \\� • , \ \ �e BU\\d\C\9 % E o • \ /1\ \`�`\ 1 BIT= T T_BUR�_'� \ \ 1\\`\` 1 I 957.14 \ ,95a °' _ - - -SUR �_ I `\ 1 0) 1\ "kF� 0 j 1 13 - - - \ T -BUR �BUR 1 1 go \ �\ I VvA S, \ \ ` I I V "k 354LF \�---------- ORNAMENTAL \ I \ 18" RCP (CL III) \ FENCE ® 0.37% / / 1 ° \\ p\\ ► i kk \ I F� C. z �/ ;;\ \\ \\ / STABILIZED I EX\s Q �- / / ;�i \ \ /' CONSTRUCTION I I MANUAL\`, \\ n, , \ \ ` ORNAMENTAL 1 oe P i ROLLING Q ;;_ ENTRANCE 10 C�PfNECT TO ed \ \ ° yy, ` - toren M . / \ \ FENCE a.26 �o�ds I Ln 45 I s g56 6a - 15 I \\\ Q 94"165 V\ FES I 9 °e ,' \ECN�' 4150 -- \` STORM SEWER ° / J ds,,Ped- MANUAL .� // `I L0� 1 I - J_�3 ■C_--�'- � Storms== Ili11 GL=958.28 ROLLING GATE ,,v INV -948.90 10 ORNAMENTAL ares`- __ m MN �____--__ _ I (BEGIN CURB) ; FENCE Rf�� _ _____________ III =N �i� -- _ „ cos Meter - �, MN 1 ' JJI storm \ �` M \ \ \ IE N 952.23 __ '--_, 946.7 _ _ n� I % - IE� s.18 \ ®O�t 0 O 0 01 0 0 0-0 (_ p°l\ >> -� SE)=94 1 o v\ \iii I V hrO s >> - _ IE(SW)228 v e•_ / \III V ce Pas Fence -Fen / E �56i'g49 on MN 11 �, i r I it °O -r 0 0-0-0 0 0 0 0 0 sr'- ce 2 � ce L(0 _ IE(NCy) 946.78-__ ----' Iii ilql Fen - A! 4 4 I IIIS �Y4ii4 u �� \E 0 ?\ ,-,A 4I�i / Q __ )� --== IE(NW) 17 846.18 9 CB \ 4 ---- - �\ \.. l R� 56\73 gusmes n 11I \ -� F� BUR FO -BUR p -BUR FO -BUR FO -BUR F //�F BU F UR FO -BUR FO -BUR FO -BUR _FO -BUR - 958 FO -BUR FO -BUR FO-BUi �- Ost 11'7LR ' FO -BUR �� FO -BUR O� _� > San MH >> -=__ `_ = IE -95 _952.50 5 9 �li i \ \ \\ Fen ePast /� v� - _ - - - 951 Fence�P ` i r-11 ,955'4 62 Iri \ s RE=956.18 --'' ------------------� -- -- - --- ______--_------------- ______--______ _ -------- AM = / ------- _-- ---- ---- ------ --- -- ---------------------------------------------- - t > » » V - ---- ` --`--------- `� d ----------- '-------------------------- _ _ 36" RCP_ » » Q 'tet > - Storm MH 36" RCP \ Storm MH - _ » » » » » » » » » \ 0 > » » \ > » 36" RCP » » \ » Storrr��AH » \ RE=953.88 � RE=95$63 36�" RCY, R - _ I _ _ - IE (N)=948.78 \ g - -�� '-- \ 9 " > RE 957 - 9 CHELSEA ROAD \ IE (S)=948.48 `gS� \ E S 950.88 M i RE=957.22 _ 58' S6 ( )= m _48.73 1i 4__ 56_ 1 a 03 IE(NW)=945.17 IZ IE IE (W)=94942.73 -� 4-_, -^ o IEE\ W/E)=944.18 5 > > PC(3C)-843.x2 > > - > > > > > > > > > > > ( / )- > > v I ~��- N CB 1 B618 COTV-C-R-ETE CURB AND _,�� RE 95 8�'' �� N ` ` -- RE_ 956 08 ` r _ _ I ' I G "!'� I\� �R ---` - E-95 GUTTER PER MN/DOT - Q I� STANDARD PLATE 7100 ry O n DATE REVISION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was DESIGNED BY: �� 4 7/17 PLAN REVISIONS PER CITY REVIEW prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I TAE Hakanson A Q E 4/26/17 PLAN REVISIONS PER CLIENT REVIEW am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws CAMPING WORLD EAST N of the State of Mi ta. DRAWN BY: Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors 615 17 PLAN REVISIONS PER CLIENT REVIEW 0-) -0 77 17 PLAN REVISIONS PER CLIENT REVIEW TAE 3601 Thurston Ave., Anoka, Minnesota 55303 PARKING LOT EXPANSION � j 7/18/17 PLAN REVISIONS PER CITY REVIEW I UI Y A. CHECKED BY: 763-427-5860 FAX 763-427-0520 Date 3/6/17 Lic. No. 43362 CJJ www.hakanson-anderson.com LEGEND D PROPOSED BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT PER � C3 K//////� PROPOSED TIPOUT CURB PER C3 SILT FENCE PER 2 C3 DRAINAGE ARROW GL= PROPOSED GUTTER LINE ELEVATION 908.55 BIT= PROPOSED BITUMINOUS ELEVATION 908.55 GENERAL NOTES: 1. PRIOR TO IMPORTING OR EXPORTING MATERIAL FROM THE SITE, CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT A STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE PER CITY STANDARD PLATE 6002 OR 6003. 2. DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE STABILIZED WITHIN 7 DAYS OF ROUGH GRADING. 5 6 3. INSTALL INLET PROTECTION DEVICES PER C3 AND C3 AT ALL CATCH BASINS THAT MAY RECEIVE STORMWATER RUNOFF FROM THE SITE. 4. STREET SWEEPING MUST BE PERFORMED DAILY IF SEDIMENT IS TRACKED OUTSIDE THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS OR ONTO ANY CITY STREETS. 5. THE CONTRACTOR MUST STABILIZE ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREAS (INCLUDING STOCKPILES). STABILIZATION MUST BE INITIATED IMMEDIATELY TO LIMIT SOIL EROSION WHENEVER ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY HAS PERMANENTLY OR TEMPORARILY CEASED ON ANY PORTION OF THE SITE AND WILL NOT RESUME FOR A PERIOD EXCEEDING SEVEN CALENDAR DAYS. STABILIZATION MUST BE COMPLETED NO LATER THAN SEVEN CALENDAR DAYS AFTER THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IN THAT PORTION OF THE SITE HAS TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED. TEMPORARY SEEDING INFORMATION AND APPLICATION RATES ARE TABULATED ON SHEET C4. 6. SEE SHEET C5 FOR STORM SEWER INFORMATION. 7. SEE SHEET L1 FOR LANDSCAPE PLAN. 8. SEE SHEET C8 FOR THE SANITARY SEWER DUMP STATION AND SIGN LOCATIONS. REFERENCE NOTES: 10 LOCATION AND INVERT OF EXISTING STORM SEWER STUB SHALL BE VERIFIED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. A MANHOLE MAY BE NECESSARY IF THE ANGLE OF THE PIPE HAS TO BE REVISED. 30 0 30 60 SCALE IN FEET GRADING, DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA SHEET C2 C8 SHEETS 3395.05 GENERAL CONSTRUCTION AND SOILS NOTES: 1. CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 2016 EDITION OF THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION". 2. UNLESS OTHERWISE RECOMMENDED IN THESE PLANS, THE GRADING SUBGRADE SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF SUITABLE GRADING MATERIAL. THE FILL SHALL BE PLACED IN 8" TO 10" LOOSE LIFTS, AND COMPACTED TO 100% OF THE STANDARD PROCTOR MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY. 3. SUITABLE GRADING MATERIAL FOR THIS PROJECT SHALL CONSIST OF ALL SOILS ENCOUNTERED WITH THE EXCEPTION OF TOPSOIL, SILT, DEBRIS, ORGANIC MATERIAL AND OTHER UNSTABLE MATERIAL. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW THE "REPORT OF GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION AND REVIEW" PREPARED BY AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. AND DATED MARCH 2, 2017 FOR ADDITIONAL SITE PREPARATION REQUIREMENTS. 5. PROVIDE A SAW CUT WHEN PLACING NEW PAVEMENT ADJACENT TO INPLACE PAVEMENT AND AT TERMINI OF CONSTRUCTION TO ENSURE A UNIFORM JOINT. 6. BITUMINOUS AND CONCRETE ITEMS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH MN/DOT SPEC. 2104.3. 7. USE TACK COAT BETWEEN ALL BITUMINOUS MIXTURES. THE BITUMINOUS TACK COAT MATERIAL SHALL BE APPLIED AT A UNIFORM RATE OF 0.05 GAL/SY TO 0.07 GAL/SY BETWEEN BITUMINOUS LAYERS. THE APPLICATION RATES ARE FOR UNDILUTED EMULSIONS. 8. PERFORMANCE GRADED (PG) ASPHALT BINDER PG 58S-28, SPEC. 3151, SHALL BE USED FOR ALL BITUMINOUS MIXES ON THIS PROJECT. SPECIFIC PG GRADES SHALL BE LISTED AT THE END OF THE MIX DESIGNATION NUMBER SHOWN ON THE TYPICAL SECTION. 9. THE BITUMINOUS MIXTURES SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF SPECIFICATIONS 2360 AND 3139. 10. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE RESTORED WITH 4" OF TOPSOIL AND SOD. GENERAL EROSION CONTROL NOTES: 1. EROSION CONTROL SHALL CONFORM TO THE MN/DOT EROSION CONTROL HANDBOOK. 2. PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ACQUIRE THE NECESSARY MPCA NPDES STORMWATER PERMIT. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL FACILITIES (BMP'S) PRIOR TO GRADING AND REMOVAL ACTIVITIES. BMP'S SHALL BE MAINTAINED FOR THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AND POTENTIAL FOR EROSION HAS PASSED. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SCHEDULE HIS OPERATION TO MINIMIZE THE AMOUNT OF DISTURBED AREA AT ANY GIVEN TIME. 5. BMP'S SHALL BE INSPECTED DAILY BY THE CONTRACTOR. OBSERVATIONS SHALL BE RECORDED IN THE INSPECTION LOG. 6. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE PROPERLY DISPOSED OF WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS AFTER FINAL SITE STABILIZATION. 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FILE A NOTICE OF TERMINATION WITH THE MPCA AFTER FINAL STABILIZATION HAS BEEN APPROVED. REFERENCE NOTES: 10 TYPE 1 INLET PROTECTION SHALL BE INSTALLED AS NECESSARY TO MINIMIZE PONDING OF WATER DURING CONSTRUCTION. 02 TYPE 2 INLET PROTECTION SHALL BE INSTALLED ON ALL CASTINGS RECEIVING RUNOFF FROM THE PROJECT AREA. Q� LEGEN 952 -- EXISTING CONTOUR 952 PROPOSED CONTOUR N IBJ PROPERTY LINE O DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT LINE G DATE GAS MAIN P -OH PLAN REVISIONS OVERHEAD ELECTRIC N Q) P -BUR PLAN REVISIONS BURIED ELECTRIC T -BUR REVISED DETAIL BURIED TELEPHONE _ o� FO -BUR PLAN REVISIONS BURIED FIBER OPTIC ------------------------ EXISTING CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER U > EXISTING SANITARY SEWER .. >> EXISTING STORM SEWER SEWER 7 EXISTING WATERMAIN EXISTING UTILITY POLE J a EXISTING UTILITY PEDESTAL Q EXISTING LIGHT POLE w EXISTING HYDRANT Ln >< EXISTING WATERMAIN VALVE LO O EXISTING STORM SEWER MANHOLE ® EXISTING CATCH BASIN j ® EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE -� EXISTING SIGN EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE PROPOSED CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER � >> PROPOSED STORM SEWER SEWER I� w 2 �- DETAIL NUMBER 3 "W -SHEET NUMBER n SOIL BORING Q� 00 U N IBJ O n DATE REVISION 4(7/17 PLAN REVISIONS PER CITY REVIEW N Q) 6/115 17 PLAN REVISIONS PER CLIENT REVIEW 7f7/17 REVISED DETAIL 71C3 _ o� 78/17 PLAN REVISIONS PER CITY REVIEW U .. 2" TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (SPWEA240B) ���������������������������j �� BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT �� 2" TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (SPWEB240B) CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE, 100% CRUSHED PLACED ON APPROVED SUBGRADE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SECTION C3 NO SCALE POST LENGTH, 5 FT. MIN. AT 6 FT. MAX. SPACING PLASTIC ZIP TIES >>� (50LB TENSILE) LOCATED IN TOP 8" - DIRECTION OF GEOTEXTILE FABRIC, 36" WIDTH RUNOFF FLOW Z Z 0 oM w cV H 0r 0 2 C3 PLAN CASTING TO BE SET 0.10' BELOW GUTTER ELEVATION INSTALL INFRA SHIELD (OR APPROVED EQUAL) EXTERNAL CHIMNEY SEAL ADJUSTING RINGS 4" MIN - 12" MAX ENCASE WITH CONCRETE COLLAR ®� MACHINE SLICE 899 -1299 ,f -12f, DEPTH STANDARD MACHINE SLICED SILT FENCE DETAILS TO PROTECT AREAS FROM SHEET FLOW (SEE SPEC. 3886) A 35-1/4' 43" CURB INLET FRAME AND CURB BOX STANDARD CASTING - NEENAH R -3067-V *15" 1 24" 1 9" MANHOLE COVER TO BE 48" DIA CRETEX TYPE II WITH 24"x 36" 6" OPENING CONCRETE DOGHOUSE REQUIRED ON OUTSIDE AND INSIDE OF STRUCTURE w *48"(TYP) AND PIPE CONNECTION of *DIMENSION VARIES BASED ON STRUCTURE DIAMETER RCP PIPE { CONCRETE CATCH BASIN MANHOLE NOTES: AND BASE TO BE CRETEX TYPE 4338 OR APPROVED EQUAL 1. BASE TO BE GROUTED TO FORM A SMOOTH INVERT TO OUTLET. SECTION 2. PIPE CUT-OUTS TO BE LOCATED WHERE REQUIRED. CATCH BASIN MANHOLES REQUIRED IN GREEN SPACES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF PRECAST CONCRETE ONLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH Mn/DOT STANDARD PLATE 4006L THE CASTING SHALL BE NEENAH R-4342. CATCH BASIN MANHOLES LOCATED IN DRIVEWAYS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH AN ECCENTRIC TOP SLAB WITH A 27" ROUND OPENING, THE CASTING SHALL BE NEENAH R -3508-A2. Standard Plate Library City of Monticello I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Mi ta. IIMUIHY A. Date 3/6/17 Lic. No. 43362 Title: Catch Basin Manhole Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised: 03-17 4003 DESIGNED BY: TAE DRAWN BY: TAE CHECKED BY: CJJ 949.75 8612 CONCRETE CURB 6" AND GUTTER PER MN/DOT STANDARD PLATE 7100 1 'to 6.00% a �- I a u �r 12" 899 INTAKE B612 CONCRETE CURB 6„� AND GUTTER PER MN/DOT STANDARD PLATE 7100 1 1.50% 1 a MT a " �r I _ 8» 12" TIPOUT 3 C3 24" CPP HEADER ROW 4 C3 CONCRETE CURB DETAILS NO SCALE s Hakanson Anderson Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors 3601 Thurston Ave., Anoka, Minnesota 55303 763-427-5860 FAX 763-427-0520 www.hakanson-anderson.com ti 60" DIA. MANHOLE a 15" CPP TO CHAMBERS 6" CONCRETE WEIR 945.75 CONCRETE WEIR DETAIL 34.12" - 6.375" 3.63" HDPE 11-01111110- EMERGENCY IOPEN BOTH SIDES OVERFLOW I SILT FABRIC SLEEVE N PER MNDOT o oYoY�oxoSPECIFICATI ON 3886 /0 0 5.69" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2" DIAMETER ® 0 0 0 0 0 0 HOLES TOP VIEW SEDIMENT CONTROL SLOT FOR LOCKING TAB BARRIER FRAME SIDE VIEW SEDIMENT CONTROL BARRIER FRAME 5 STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION TYPE 1 O C3 PRE -CURB 949.75 2X3 HDPE FRAME INSERT CAMPING WORLD EAST PARKING LOT EXPANSION EMERGENCY OVERFLOW PORTS HDPE INSERT BASKETS SHOWN WITHOUT FILTER BAGS. 400 MICRON FILTER BAGS REQUIRED INSIDE BASKETS. 6 STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION TYPE 2 02 C3 POST -CURB DETAILS CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA SHEET C3 C8 SHEETS 3395.05 Gravel pads) MnDOT Class CA -15 or CA -25 Riprop Bedding Geotextile fabric Original grade �QU SECTION B—B (not to scale) Geotextile fabric �Riib�rbyedy dor Corrugated steel plates Original SECTION A—A grade (not to scale) NOTES: Channelize runoff to sediment \ /Sediment Trapping Device trapping device Ribbed or Corrugated steel plates i A A I �v° A E O o % Dom° ------------- CD —illp B J cn 24' min. x 1 / Slope away from w highway i 50' min. Match or Right of Way Existing Grade PLAN Title: Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Commercial Gravel Construction Entrance Date: 06-14 Plate No. Revised: 0 3 —15 6002 - J EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL QUANTITIES 6" (TYP.) WATER TOWER BASE AND SET SCREW 4 EXISTING PAVED 12, MIN ROADWAY END OVERLAP IS' MIN ll`2�7 TRM END OVERLAP WITH SPIKES OR STAKES STRAP CONNECTORS CONSTRUCTION MAT END OVERLAP INTERLOCK WITH STRAP CONNECTORS END OVERLAP a a o v v' MN/DOT APPLICATION APPROXIMATE ITEM SPECIFICATION RATE QUANTITY SOD TYPE LAWN 3878 N/A 2700 SQ YD FERTILIZER TYPE 1 3881 300 LBS/ACRE 167 LBS STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION 2573 N/A 8 EACH SILT FENCE 3886 N/A 1604 LIN FT STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 2573 N/A 1 EACH 6" (TYP.) WATER TOWER BASE AND SET SCREW 4 EXISTING PAVED 12, MIN ROADWAY END OVERLAP IS' MIN ll`2�7 TRM END OVERLAP WITH SPIKES OR STAKES STRAP CONNECTORS CONSTRUCTION MAT END OVERLAP INTERLOCK WITH STRAP CONNECTORS END OVERLAP a a o v v' GENERAL NOTES: — — — — 1. MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW ALL DUMP STATION SEPARATION DISTANCES AND DIMENSIONS AND REVISE AS J COAT NEEDED TO MEET ALL CODES. REFERENCE NOTES: 10 SIGN A SHALL BE PART #DUMPSTATIONSIGN AS PROVIDED � BY WILDFLOWER MEADOWS, LLC (DBA RVPARKSUPPLIES.COM), Q VANCOUVER, WASHINGTON OR APPROVED EQUAL. 0 (2) DUMP STATION LID SHALL BE PART #METALDUMPSTATIONLID o 4 AS PROVIDED BY WILDFLOWER MEADOWS, LLC LO (DBA RVPARKSUPPLIES.COM), VANCOUVER, WASHINGTON OR APPROVED EQUAL. 03 WATER TOWER SHALL BE PART #DUMPSTATIONWATER AS PROVIDED BY WILDFLOWER MEADOWS, LLC i SLOPE (DBA RVPARKSUPPLIES.COM), VANCOUVER, WASHINGTON OR LO TO LID APPROVED EQUAL. LI D ® CONTRACTOR SHALL SAWCUT EXISTING PAVEMENT AS I III REQUIRED TO INSTALL DUMP STATION. PATCH BITUMINOUS i TO MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT AND GRAVEL BASE SECTIONS. 05 MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR SHALL HARD PLUMB YARD > HYDRANT TO WATER TOWER. ALL PLUMBING SHALL BE IN Q:� 27" ACCORDANCE WITH ALL CODES. n E © MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL A BALL VALVE AT UTHE MANWAY LOW POINT TO FACILITATE DRAINING OF THE WATER ,N w ° TOWER AFTER EACH USE DURING FREEZING TEMPERATURES. 0 4° n DATE REVISION o 7/18/17 ADDED SHEET � N N I 0-) -0 ° J �0 U d U-) D .. �4 6" (TYP.) WATER TOWER BASE AND SET SCREW 4 EXISTING PAVED 12, MIN ROADWAY END OVERLAP IS' MIN ll`2�7 TRM END OVERLAP WITH SPIKES OR STAKES STRAP CONNECTORS CONSTRUCTION MAT END OVERLAP INTERLOCK WITH STRAP CONNECTORS END OVERLAP a a o v v' ca PAD AREA (ANY SIZE) DISTURBED AREA, CONSTRUCTION SITE, STABILIZED STORAGE AREA OR STAGING AREA SIDE OVERLAP Standard Plate Library City of Monticello E_ 44 / 16" DIAMETER 4 CONCRETE FOOTING 4 SIDE /OVERLAP Title: Mud Mat Entrance Date: 06-14 Plate No. Revised: 06-14 6003 (4) 1/2"X12" GALVANIZED J—BOLTS, EMBED 10" 16" DIAMETER CONCRETE FOOTING 7 4 a / I 4 a (4) 1/2"X12" GALVANIZED J—BOLTS, EMBED 10" AIR GAP BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT r 2OWATER TOWER FOUNDATION C4 I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was DESIGNED BY: prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I TAE am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Mi ta. DRAWN BY: er--,. . - 0 TAE I 01 Y A. CHECKED BY. Date 3/6/17 Lic. No. 43362 CJJ TOWER TO WATER DRAIN © SUPPLY TOWER DRAIN--,,,,,— FROST PROOF n YARD HYDRANT (3 SUMP—NEENAH R -2565—A CASTING. MAINTAIN AIR GAP. \ SIGN AT SEEC1 3 / WATER TOWER 03 WATER TOWER FOUNDATION. / \ SEE i2�. Z_ J DUCTILE IRON DUMP STATION LID WITH FOOT PEDAL CAST INTO SLAB (2 r — — — — — — — — — — — — — 4" STEEL BOLLARD IN 12" — — — — — — — — — — — DIA. J COAT a STEEL—SAFETY YELLOW O r a r0 4 ca PAD AREA (ANY SIZE) DISTURBED AREA, CONSTRUCTION SITE, STABILIZED STORAGE AREA OR STAGING AREA SIDE OVERLAP Standard Plate Library City of Monticello E_ 44 / 16" DIAMETER 4 CONCRETE FOOTING 4 SIDE /OVERLAP Title: Mud Mat Entrance Date: 06-14 Plate No. Revised: 06-14 6003 (4) 1/2"X12" GALVANIZED J—BOLTS, EMBED 10" 16" DIAMETER CONCRETE FOOTING 7 4 a / I 4 a (4) 1/2"X12" GALVANIZED J—BOLTS, EMBED 10" AIR GAP BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT r 2OWATER TOWER FOUNDATION C4 I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was DESIGNED BY: prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I TAE am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Mi ta. DRAWN BY: er--,. . - 0 TAE I 01 Y A. CHECKED BY. Date 3/6/17 Lic. No. 43362 CJJ TOWER TO WATER DRAIN © SUPPLY TOWER DRAIN--,,,,,— FROST PROOF n YARD HYDRANT (3 SUMP—NEENAH R -2565—A CASTING. MAINTAIN AIR GAP. \ SIGN AT SEEC1 3 / WATER TOWER 03 WATER TOWER FOUNDATION. / \ SEE i2�. Z_ J DUCTILE IRON DUMP STATION LID WITH FOOT PEDAL CAST INTO SLAB (2 r — — — — — — — — — — — — — 4" STEEL BOLLARD IN 12" — — — — — — — — — — — DIA. CONCRETE FOOTING. EPDXY COAT STEEL—SAFETY YELLOW O r r0 4 SLOPE SLOPE TO LID LI D I III sTO, I � 4 4 ° I ° 27" DIAMETER ' J d MANWAY ° 4° ° -1 ° 4 ° °4 ° J d U-) �4 a Uj 7" CONCRETE o J PAD I J N o 4° I s �s 2' 2' 2,000 GALLON PLAN VIEW SEPTIC TANK NEENAH R-1733 FRAME WITH SOLID COVER. COVER SHALL HAVE TWO C I LIFT HANDLES BITUMINOUS —' ' ' PAVEMENT ® 1 /4" POLYISOPRENE GASKET AND THE WORDS "SANITARY SEWER". r 8.3% � �8,3/ 17 (2) 2" CONCRETE ��- 4" SCHEDULE 80 PVC MALE 7" CONCRETE ADJUSTING RINGS ADAPTOR (SCREW X SOLVENT PAD SLIP WELD) 00 6" (3 LAYERS) 4" SCHEDULE 80 I POLYSTYRENE PVC PIPE INSULATION 4" FERNCO BALL VALVE COUPLING TO WATER TOWER NEENAH R -2565—A CASTING. J\_1�24" CPP DZ�C 04 ������ 1 1/299 ROCK r s 2' MIN. (ALL EDGES) 3 TOWER DRAIN SUMP C4 Hakanson Anderson Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors 3601 Thurston Ave., Anoka, Minnesota 55303 763-427-5860 FAX 763-427-0520 www. hakanson—anderson.com r 4" SCHEDULE 80 PVC RISER CAST INTO COVER 27" DIA. CONCRETE�� PIPE RISER PER MN/DOT STANDARD PLATE 4006 PROFILE VIEW 1 DUMP STATION DETAIL C4 CAMPING WORLD EAST PARKING LOT EXPANSION 2,000 GALLON PRECAST CONCRETE SEPTIC TANK DETAILS CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA SHEET C4 C8 SHEETS 3395.05 s 24" CPP HEADER_ ROW WITH 10" CPP STUBS TO CHAMBERS (7 TOTAL STUBS) CB/MH #1 0 60" DIA. (R-3246) FL=954.35 (N,S,E)INV=949.75 SUMP=945.75 4LF 24" CPP--, ® 0.00% CB/MH #2 48" DIA. (R-3246) FL=954.41 (N,S,E)INV=949.75 SUMP=945.75 4LF 24" CPP-/ @ 0.00% CB/MH #3 48" DIA. (R-3246) FL=954.47 (N,E)INV=949.75 SUMP=945.75 ADS 315ST WOVEN GEOTEXTILE FABRIC OVER FOUNDATION STONE FOR SCOUR PROTECTION L1 1 NEWL 15" CPP STUB FROM MANHOLE TO CHAMBER PROPOSED B612 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER GENERAL NOTES: 1. ALL STORM SEWER STRUCTURES SHALL BE PRECAST CONCRETE SECTIONS PER MN/DOT STANDARD PLATE 4020 AND 4022. STRUCTURES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED PER CITY STANDARD PLATE 4003. REFERENCE NOTES: 10 PLACE GEOSYNTHETIC FABRIC ON THE TOP AND ON ALL SIDES OF THE ANGULAR STONE. DO NOT PLACE FABRIC UNDER THE ANGULAR STONE. �2 SEE SHEETS C5 AND C6 FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES AND DETAILS FOR THE STORMTECH CHAMBER. 03 STRUCTURE SHALL INCLUDE A 6" CONCRETE WEIR PER(!:).C3 STORMTECH SC -740 CHAMBER (TYP.) 51" (TYP.) APPROVED SUBGRADE CHAMBERS PLACED 57" ON CENTER (6" BETWEEN CHAMBERS) --EDGE OF INFILTRATION AREA STORMTECH SC -740 CHAMBER (TYP.) ADS GEOSYNTHETICS 601T NON -WOVEN GEOTEXTILE FABRIC( 691 20 0 10 20 SCALE IN FEET C5Q PARKING LOT SECTION VARIES o 0 952.75 952.25 949.75 949.00 " 12 �s CHAMBERS PLACED 69" ON CENTER (18" BETWEEN CHAMBERS) 2OC5 CHAMBER SYSTEM CROSS SECTION OO I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was DESIGNED BY: prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I TAE am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the Stateof Mi ta. DRAWN BY: TAE 1 01 Y A. CHECKED BY: Date 3/6/17 6t6LUi1C11No. 43362 CJJ 274.2' 52' 1 8" CPP HEADER ROW WITH 8" CPP STUBS TO CHAMBERS (14 TOTAL STUBS) f II II _1101- STORMTECH STM/MH #4 SC -740 END CAP 48" DIA. (R-1733) (TYP.)RIM=955.73 �18" RCP (N)INV=949.75 OUTLET PIPE (S)INV=950.22 V_ ADS 315ST WOVEN -- GEOTEXTILE FABRIC OVER FOUNDATION STONE FOR SCOUR PROTECTION CHAMBER SYSTEM PLAN VIEW 02 Hakanson Anderson Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors 3601 Thurston Ave., Anoka, Minnesota 55303 763-427-5860 FAX 763-427-0520 www.hakanson-anderson.com CONCRETE COLLAR PAVEMENT CONCRETE SLAB 8" (200 mm) MIN THICKNESS 'Al I 15" CPP STUB FROM MANHOLE TO CHAMBER -� 24" CPP HEADER ROW WITH 10" CPP STUBS TO CHAMBERS (7 TOTAL STUBS) CB/MH #5 0 60" DIA. (R -3360-A) RIM=954.38 (N,S,W)INV=949.75 SUMP=945.75 4LF 24" CPP �-- 0 0.00% CB MH #6 48" DIA. (R -3360-A) RIM=954.28 (N,S,W)INV=949.75 SUMP=945.75 4LF 24" CPP 0 0.00% CB/MH #7 48" DIA. (R -3360-A) RIM=954.18 (N,S)INV=949.75 SUMP=945.75 18" (450 mm) MIN WIDTH CONCRETE COLLAR NOT REQUIRED FOR UNPAVED APPLICATIONS 15" (375 mm) NYLOPLAST INLINE DRAIN BODY W/SOLID HINGED COVER OR GRATE PART# 2715AG 101 P SOLID COVER: 1599CGC GRATE:1599CGS 10" (250 mm) SDR35 PIPE SC -740 CHAMBER FLEXSTORM CATCH IT od �I PART# 6215NYFX WITH USE OF OPEN GRATE 10" (250 mm) INSERTA TEE PART# 1OP35STIP 1 '0 0 0 0 0 '0 0 t INSERTA TEE TO BE CENTERED 0 ON CORRUGATION CREST QC53 SC -740 10" INSPECTION PORT DETAIL CAMPING WORLD EAST PARKING LOT EXPANSION STORMTECH SC -740 CHAMBER SYSTEM DETAILS CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA SHEET C5 C8 SHEETS 3395.05 v w O v CLEAN, CRUSHED, J ANGULAR STONE 2 Q 0 0 0 0 O L o LO O LO 12 w Q N w O j DATE REVISION 6/15/17 ADDED SHEET N 7/18/17 PLAN REVISIONS PER CITY REVIEW N 0 �I �0 U _D .. STORMTECH SC -740 CHAMBER (TYP.) 51" (TYP.) APPROVED SUBGRADE CHAMBERS PLACED 57" ON CENTER (6" BETWEEN CHAMBERS) --EDGE OF INFILTRATION AREA STORMTECH SC -740 CHAMBER (TYP.) ADS GEOSYNTHETICS 601T NON -WOVEN GEOTEXTILE FABRIC( 691 20 0 10 20 SCALE IN FEET C5Q PARKING LOT SECTION VARIES o 0 952.75 952.25 949.75 949.00 " 12 �s CHAMBERS PLACED 69" ON CENTER (18" BETWEEN CHAMBERS) 2OC5 CHAMBER SYSTEM CROSS SECTION OO I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was DESIGNED BY: prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I TAE am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the Stateof Mi ta. DRAWN BY: TAE 1 01 Y A. CHECKED BY: Date 3/6/17 6t6LUi1C11No. 43362 CJJ 274.2' 52' 1 8" CPP HEADER ROW WITH 8" CPP STUBS TO CHAMBERS (14 TOTAL STUBS) f II II _1101- STORMTECH STM/MH #4 SC -740 END CAP 48" DIA. (R-1733) (TYP.)RIM=955.73 �18" RCP (N)INV=949.75 OUTLET PIPE (S)INV=950.22 V_ ADS 315ST WOVEN -- GEOTEXTILE FABRIC OVER FOUNDATION STONE FOR SCOUR PROTECTION CHAMBER SYSTEM PLAN VIEW 02 Hakanson Anderson Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors 3601 Thurston Ave., Anoka, Minnesota 55303 763-427-5860 FAX 763-427-0520 www.hakanson-anderson.com CONCRETE COLLAR PAVEMENT CONCRETE SLAB 8" (200 mm) MIN THICKNESS 'Al I 15" CPP STUB FROM MANHOLE TO CHAMBER -� 24" CPP HEADER ROW WITH 10" CPP STUBS TO CHAMBERS (7 TOTAL STUBS) CB/MH #5 0 60" DIA. (R -3360-A) RIM=954.38 (N,S,W)INV=949.75 SUMP=945.75 4LF 24" CPP �-- 0 0.00% CB MH #6 48" DIA. (R -3360-A) RIM=954.28 (N,S,W)INV=949.75 SUMP=945.75 4LF 24" CPP 0 0.00% CB/MH #7 48" DIA. (R -3360-A) RIM=954.18 (N,S)INV=949.75 SUMP=945.75 18" (450 mm) MIN WIDTH CONCRETE COLLAR NOT REQUIRED FOR UNPAVED APPLICATIONS 15" (375 mm) NYLOPLAST INLINE DRAIN BODY W/SOLID HINGED COVER OR GRATE PART# 2715AG 101 P SOLID COVER: 1599CGC GRATE:1599CGS 10" (250 mm) SDR35 PIPE SC -740 CHAMBER FLEXSTORM CATCH IT od �I PART# 6215NYFX WITH USE OF OPEN GRATE 10" (250 mm) INSERTA TEE PART# 1OP35STIP 1 '0 0 0 0 0 '0 0 t INSERTA TEE TO BE CENTERED 0 ON CORRUGATION CREST QC53 SC -740 10" INSPECTION PORT DETAIL CAMPING WORLD EAST PARKING LOT EXPANSION STORMTECH SC -740 CHAMBER SYSTEM DETAILS CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA SHEET C5 C8 SHEETS 3395.05 w PLEASE NOTE: a 1. THE LISTED AASHTO DESIGNATIONS ARE FOR GRADATIONS ONLY. THE STONE MUST ALSO BE CLEAN, CRUSHED, ANGULAR. FOR EXAMPLE, A SPECIFICATION FOR #4 STONE WOULD STATE: "CLEAN, CRUSHED, ANGULAR NO. 4 (AASHTO M43) STONE". Y 2. STORMTECH COMPACTION REQUIREMENTS ARE MET FOR'A' LOCATION MATERIALS WHEN PLACED AND COMPACTED IN 6" (150 mm) (MAX) LIFTS USING TWO FULL COVERAGES WITH A VIBRATORY COMPACTOR. U _j 3. WHERE INFILTRATION SURFACES MAY BE COMPROMISED BY COMPACTION, FOR STANDARD DESIGN LOAD CONDITIONS, A FLAT SURFACE MAY BE ACHIEVED BY RAKING OR DRAGGING WITHOUT COMPACTION EQUIPMENT. FOR SPECIAL LOAD DESIGNS, CONTACT STORMTECH FOR COMPACTION REQUIREMENTS. 2 o PERIMETER STONE (SEE NOTE 6) EXCAVATION WALL (CAN BE SLOPED OR VERTICAL) NOTES: ADS GEOSYNTHETICS 601T NON -WOVEN GEOTEXTILE ALL > AROUND CLEAN, CRUSHED, ANGULAR STONE IN A & B LAYERS PAVEMENT LAYER (DESIGNED BY SITE DESIGN ENGINEER) ill. ill. ill. ill. ill. ill. &r�,. &/VIALr &IL &IL r�,. Ill. ill. ill. &ill. & ill. ill. ill. ill. ill.& ill.i 12" (300 mm) MIN SC -740 END CAP SUBGRADE SOILS (SEE NOTE 4) *TO BOTTOM OF FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT. FOR UNPAVED INSTALLATIONS WHERE RUTTING FROM VEHICLES MAY OCCUR, INCREASE COVER TO 24" (600 mm). I �� Q Q c ® ® Q Q c Q c TiEEi I I- III -1 I I-1 I I-1 I I-1 I I-1 I I-1 I I-1 I I-1 I I-1 I I-1 I I-1 I I- I I I-1 I I- I I—I 11—I I I—� 1—I 1—I 11—I I I—I I I—I I I—I I I—I I I—III—I I —I I I—I II—III-------------- -111 , ,III_,IIII1111111III_,III,_„III_,IIIII�I IIIIIII�IIII, 1 ,III, I ,III, ,III_, IIII�I111 6” (150 mm) MIN --- -.-51" (1295 mm) 1. SC -740 CHAMBERS SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM F2418 "STANDARD SPECIFICATION FOR POLYPROPYLENE (PP) CORRUGATED WALL STORMWATER COLLECTION CHAMBERS", OR ASTM F2922 "STANDARD SPECIFICATION FOR POLYETHYLENE (PE) CORRUGATED WALL STORMWATER COLLECTION CHAMBERS". 2. SC -740 CHAMBERS SHALL BE DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM F2787 "STANDARD PRACTICE FOR STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF THERMOPLASTIC CORRUGATED WALL STORMWATER COLLECTION CHAMBERS". 3. "ACCEPTABLE FILL MATERIALS" TABLE ABOVE PROVIDES MATERIAL LOCATIONS, DESCRIPTIONS, GRADATIONS, AND COMPACTION REQUIREMENTS FOR FOUNDATION, EMBEDMENT, AND FILL MATERIALS. 4. THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ASSESSING THE BEARING RESISTANCE (ALLOWABLE BEARING CAPACITY) OF THE SUBGRADE SOILS AND THE DEPTH OF FOUNDATION STONE WITH CONSIDERATION FOR THE RANGE OF EXPECTED SOIL MOISTURE CONDITIONS. 5. PERIMETER STONE MUST BE EXTENDED HORIZONTALLY TO THE EXCAVATION WALL FOR BOTH VERTICAL AND SLOPED EXCAVATION WALLS. 6. ONCE LAYER 'C' IS PLACED, ANY SOIL/MATERIAL CAN BE PLACED IN LAYER 'D' UP TO THE FINISHED GRADE. MOST PAVEMENT SUBBASE SOILS CAN BE USED TO REPLACE THE MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS OF LAYER'C' OR'D' AT THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER'S DISCRETION. 1 6" (150 mm) MIN i 30" (760 mm) 1 8' 18" (2.4 m) (450 mm) MIN* MAX 1 f DEPTH OF STONE TO BE DETERMINED BY SITE DESIGN ENGINEER 6" (150 mm) MIN 12" (300 mm) TYP Z O U W �U) V �JJ V ) O U 0 Q 0 Z Q U) :, 00 Lu 0 Lm 0 6 o(c) J N 00 M Z CIO <r- 2 w0ti C) co M ��ti Q O J O o coJ_ 00 2 In z ui 2 w U) w a z 0 0 LU U z a 0 a 2 Lu0 U LuU o� U O = U � w U J O U 3: O cy N � N u) c 0 00 < oc) O o0 0 000 O- 0 3: rn z C) 00 SHEET z O U W z O U O O a_ 0 z Q 0 L0 Lu W J J Q U) Lu Lu z c -q � zz W W zw (D Q� U) D 0LLJ 0 W Uw W Lu =O wo '-z �Q ZZ LU Uo Lu I-_ 0�Ja-_J �w U Lu(n) °< �w W J 2 m OU �a OQ Lu J W J W < z 0w Zw wg Z (� J W W 0 0 ,o Fn wQ � U �O O Cc/) Z < OJ J U < W 0 � Z 0 < W 0 W 2 I. - C) � a ww O p z .-. DU) 0 U <S 00 0 d W w 0 o~ 0�< wQ z� Ow Q� �co �Z LU LL 00 z� z� Ow Lu 0z Lu (D <Z LU Ca 0 Z Lu CD aw a-C)wW a_F_ zcf) W w Lu= m� C/) W <0 (D Z J m Qcf) 12f Z 00 ct)a —U) LU C6 OF C8 ACCEPTABLE FILL MATERIALS: STORMTECH SC -740 CHAMBER SYSTEMS AASHTO MATERIAL COMPACTION /DENSITY MATERIAL LOCATION DESCRIPTION CLASSIFICATIONS REQUIREMENT C) FINAL FILL: FILL MATERIAL FOR LAYER'D' STARTS Nt FROM THE TOP OF THE 'C' LAYER TO THE BOTTOM ANY SOIL/ROCK MATERIALS, NATIVE SOILS, OR PER PREPARE PER SITE DESIGN ENGINEER'S PLANS. ti D OF FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT OR UNPAVED FINISHED ENGINEER'S PLANS. CHECK PLANS FOR PAVEMENT N/A PAVED INSTALLATIONS MAY HAVE STRINGENT 0 GRADE ABOVE. NOTE THAT PAVEMENT SUBBASE SUBGRADE REQUIREMENTS. MATERIAL AND PREPARATION REQUIREMENTS. U) MAY BE PART OF THE 'D' LAYER BEGIN COMPACTIONS AFTER 12" (300 mm) OF AASHTO M145' MATERIAL OVER THE CHAMBERS IS REACHED. INITIAL FILL: FILL MATERIAL FOR LAYER'C' GRANULAR WELL -GRADED SOIL/AGGREGATE MIXTURES, <35% A-1, A-24, A-3 COMPACT ADDITIONAL LAYERS IN 6" (150 mm) MAX STARTS FROM THE TOP OF THE EMBEDMENT FINES OR PROCESSED AGGREGATE. LIFTS TO A MIN. 95% PROCTOR DENSITY FOR C STONE (B,LAYER) TO 18, (450 mm) ABOVE THE OR WELL GRADED MATERIAL AND 95% RELATIVE TOP OF THE CHAMBER. NOTE THAT PAVEMENT MOST PAVEMENT SUBBASE MATERIALS CAN BE USED IN LIEU AASHTO M43' DENSITY FOR PROCESSED AGGREGATE SUBBASE MAY BE A PART OF THE 'C' LAYER. OF THIS LAYER. 3, 357, 4, 467, 5, 56, 57, 6, 67, 68, 7, 78, 8, 89, MATERIALS. ROLLER GROSS VEHICLE WEIGHT 9,10 NOT TO EXCEED 12,000 lbs (53 kN). DYNAMIC FORCE NOT TO EXCEED 20,000 lbs (89 kN). EMBEDMENT STONE: FILL SURROUNDING THE AASHTO M43' z B CHAMBERS FROM THE FOUNDATION STONE ('A' CLEAN, CRUSHED, ANGULAR STONE NO COMPACTION REQUIRED. O LAYER) TO THE 'C' LAYER ABOVE. 3, 357, 4, 467, 5, 56, 57 FOUNDATION STONE: FILL BELOW CHAMBERS AASHTO M43' PLATE COMPACT OR ROLL TO ACHIEVE A FLAT co A FROM THE SUBGRADE UP TO THE FOOT (BOTTOM) CLEAN, CRUSHED, ANGULAR STONE 3, 357, 4, 467, 5, 56, 57 SURFACE. 2 3 w OF THE CHAMBER. � w PLEASE NOTE: a 1. THE LISTED AASHTO DESIGNATIONS ARE FOR GRADATIONS ONLY. THE STONE MUST ALSO BE CLEAN, CRUSHED, ANGULAR. FOR EXAMPLE, A SPECIFICATION FOR #4 STONE WOULD STATE: "CLEAN, CRUSHED, ANGULAR NO. 4 (AASHTO M43) STONE". Y 2. STORMTECH COMPACTION REQUIREMENTS ARE MET FOR'A' LOCATION MATERIALS WHEN PLACED AND COMPACTED IN 6" (150 mm) (MAX) LIFTS USING TWO FULL COVERAGES WITH A VIBRATORY COMPACTOR. U _j 3. WHERE INFILTRATION SURFACES MAY BE COMPROMISED BY COMPACTION, FOR STANDARD DESIGN LOAD CONDITIONS, A FLAT SURFACE MAY BE ACHIEVED BY RAKING OR DRAGGING WITHOUT COMPACTION EQUIPMENT. FOR SPECIAL LOAD DESIGNS, CONTACT STORMTECH FOR COMPACTION REQUIREMENTS. 2 o PERIMETER STONE (SEE NOTE 6) EXCAVATION WALL (CAN BE SLOPED OR VERTICAL) NOTES: ADS GEOSYNTHETICS 601T NON -WOVEN GEOTEXTILE ALL > AROUND CLEAN, CRUSHED, ANGULAR STONE IN A & B LAYERS PAVEMENT LAYER (DESIGNED BY SITE DESIGN ENGINEER) ill. ill. ill. ill. ill. ill. &r�,. &/VIALr &IL &IL r�,. Ill. ill. ill. &ill. & ill. ill. ill. ill. ill.& ill.i 12" (300 mm) MIN SC -740 END CAP SUBGRADE SOILS (SEE NOTE 4) *TO BOTTOM OF FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT. FOR UNPAVED INSTALLATIONS WHERE RUTTING FROM VEHICLES MAY OCCUR, INCREASE COVER TO 24" (600 mm). I �� Q Q c ® ® Q Q c Q c TiEEi I I- III -1 I I-1 I I-1 I I-1 I I-1 I I-1 I I-1 I I-1 I I-1 I I-1 I I-1 I I- I I I-1 I I- I I—I 11—I I I—� 1—I 1—I 11—I I I—I I I—I I I—I I I—I I I—III—I I —I I I—I II—III-------------- -111 , ,III_,IIII1111111III_,III,_„III_,IIIII�I IIIIIII�IIII, 1 ,III, I ,III, ,III_, IIII�I111 6” (150 mm) MIN --- -.-51" (1295 mm) 1. SC -740 CHAMBERS SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM F2418 "STANDARD SPECIFICATION FOR POLYPROPYLENE (PP) CORRUGATED WALL STORMWATER COLLECTION CHAMBERS", OR ASTM F2922 "STANDARD SPECIFICATION FOR POLYETHYLENE (PE) CORRUGATED WALL STORMWATER COLLECTION CHAMBERS". 2. SC -740 CHAMBERS SHALL BE DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM F2787 "STANDARD PRACTICE FOR STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF THERMOPLASTIC CORRUGATED WALL STORMWATER COLLECTION CHAMBERS". 3. "ACCEPTABLE FILL MATERIALS" TABLE ABOVE PROVIDES MATERIAL LOCATIONS, DESCRIPTIONS, GRADATIONS, AND COMPACTION REQUIREMENTS FOR FOUNDATION, EMBEDMENT, AND FILL MATERIALS. 4. THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ASSESSING THE BEARING RESISTANCE (ALLOWABLE BEARING CAPACITY) OF THE SUBGRADE SOILS AND THE DEPTH OF FOUNDATION STONE WITH CONSIDERATION FOR THE RANGE OF EXPECTED SOIL MOISTURE CONDITIONS. 5. PERIMETER STONE MUST BE EXTENDED HORIZONTALLY TO THE EXCAVATION WALL FOR BOTH VERTICAL AND SLOPED EXCAVATION WALLS. 6. ONCE LAYER 'C' IS PLACED, ANY SOIL/MATERIAL CAN BE PLACED IN LAYER 'D' UP TO THE FINISHED GRADE. MOST PAVEMENT SUBBASE SOILS CAN BE USED TO REPLACE THE MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS OF LAYER'C' OR'D' AT THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER'S DISCRETION. 1 6" (150 mm) MIN i 30" (760 mm) 1 8' 18" (2.4 m) (450 mm) MIN* MAX 1 f DEPTH OF STONE TO BE DETERMINED BY SITE DESIGN ENGINEER 6" (150 mm) MIN 12" (300 mm) TYP Z O U W �U) V �JJ V ) O U 0 Q 0 Z Q U) :, 00 Lu 0 Lm 0 6 o(c) J N 00 M Z CIO <r- 2 w0ti C) co M ��ti Q O J O o coJ_ 00 2 In z ui 2 w U) w a z 0 0 LU U z a 0 a 2 Lu0 U LuU o� U O = U � w U J O U 3: O cy N � N u) c 0 00 < oc) O o0 0 000 O- 0 3: rn z C) 00 SHEET z O U W z O U O O a_ 0 z Q 0 L0 Lu W J J Q U) Lu Lu z c -q � zz W W zw (D Q� U) D 0LLJ 0 W Uw W Lu =O wo '-z �Q ZZ LU Uo Lu I-_ 0�Ja-_J �w U Lu(n) °< �w W J 2 m OU �a OQ Lu J W J W < z 0w Zw wg Z (� J W W 0 0 ,o Fn wQ � U �O O Cc/) Z < OJ J U < W 0 � Z 0 < W 0 W 2 I. - C) � a ww O p z .-. DU) 0 U <S 00 0 d W w 0 o~ 0�< wQ z� Ow Q� �co �Z LU LL 00 z� z� Ow Lu 0z Lu (D <Z LU Ca 0 Z Lu CD aw a-C)wW a_F_ zcf) W w Lu= m� C/) W <0 (D Z J m Qcf) 12f Z 00 ct)a —U) LU C6 OF C8 COVER ENTIRE ISOLATOR ROW WITH ADS GEOSYNTHETICS 601T NON—WOVEN GEOTEXTILE 8'(2.4 m) MIN WIDE SC -740 CHAMBER OPTIONAL INSPECTION PORT STORMTECH HIGHLY RECOMMENDS FLEXSTORM PURE INSERTS IN ANY UPSTREAM STRUCTURES WITH OPEN GRATES i/ i/ i/i a a•• ., ; • , a i i ,ii,� i i/�, // // I I // I I // I I // I I // I I // I I // I I- // I I I I I I�-77, \I,�/ // �I \I� // �I \I� // �I \I� // �I \I� // �I \I�,\ // �I \I�,\ // / / / / / / / / / /\\ / / / / / / / / / / / / / / \ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ / -_, � /II,�/II,�/II,�/II,�//\7/ /�/�/�/�/�/�/�/�/ \��/\��/\��/�\��/�/�/\�/\�/\�/\\�/\�\\�/�/�/�/\\ \�� ;/II; I,;/ /;/;/;/;/;/;/;/ SC -740 END CAP �// / / /, /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/ /\,/\,/\/\/\/\/\/ /�/�/� / / ,� / // // / // // I//II,�/II /�/�/�/�/�/�/�/\�/\\\�/� \�/ \"/�/ �,�\/� /�/�/�/�/�/ \� \\ //�; \\7\ SUMP DEPTH TBD BY SITE DESIGN ENGINEER (24" [600 mm] MIN RECOMMENDED) — INSPECTION & MAINTENANCE STEP 1) INSPECT ISOLATOR ROW FOR SEDIMENT 1 � 1�� 1� � � �� I � _ � I� � 1!I ��� _SIC ►� CATCH BASIN . ..I►i1 • ♦ ' ��I � �;ii ' �/ii , i 1II/II I ..II I� 1 �► _� 1 II b ►pillOR MANHOLE � I 24" (600 mm) HDPE ACCESS PIPE REQUIRED USE FACTORY PRE—FABRICATED END CAP PART #: SC740EPE24B SC -740 ISOLATOR ROW DETAIL NTS A. INSPECTION PORTS (IF PRESENT) A.1. REMOVE/OPEN LID ON NYLOPLAST INLINE DRAIN A.2. REMOVE AND CLEAN FLEXSTORM FILTER IF INSTALLED A.3. USING A FLASHLIGHT AND STADIA ROD, MEASURE DEPTH OF SEDIMENT AND RECORD ON MAINTENANCE LOG A.4. LOWER A CAMERA INTO ISOLATOR ROW FOR VISUAL INSPECTION OF SEDIMENT LEVELS (OPTIONAL) A.5. IF SEDIMENT IS AT, OR ABOVE, 3" (80 mm) PROCEED TO STEP 2. IF NOT, PROCEED TO STEP 3. B. ALL ISOLATOR ROWS B.1. REMOVE COVER FROM STRUCTURE AT UPSTREAM END OF ISOLATOR ROW B.2. USING A FLASHLIGHT, INSPECT DOWN THE ISOLATOR ROW THROUGH OUTLET PIPE i) MIRRORS ON POLES OR CAMERAS MAY BE USED TO AVOID A CONFINED SPACE ENTRY ii) FOLLOW OSHA REGULATIONS FOR CONFINED SPACE ENTRY IF ENTERING MANHOLE B.3. IF SEDIMENT IS AT, OR ABOVE, 3" (80 mm) PROCEED TO STEP 2. IF NOT, PROCEED TO STEP 3. STEP 2) CLEAN OUT ISOLATOR ROW USING THE JETVAC PROCESS A. A FIXED CULVERT CLEANING NOZZLE WITH REAR FACING SPREAD OF 45" (1.1 m) OR MORE IS PREFERRED B. APPLY MULTIPLE PASSES OF JETVAC UNTIL BACKFLUSH WATER IS CLEAN C. VACUUM STRUCTURE SUMP AS REQUIRED STEP 3) REPLACE ALL COVERS, GRATES, FILTERS, AND LIDS; RECORD OBSERVATIONS AND ACTIONS. STEP 4) INSPECT AND CLEAN BASINS AND MANHOLES UPSTREAM OF THE STORMTECH SYSTEM. NOTES 1. INSPECT EVERY 6 MONTHS DURING THE FIRST YEAR OF OPERATION. ADJUST THE INSPECTION INTERVAL BASED ON PREVIOUS OBSERVATIONS OF SEDIMENT ACCUMULATION AND HIGH WATER ELEVATIONS. 2. CONDUCT JETTING AND VACTORING ANNUALLY OR WHEN INSPECTION SHOWS THAT MAINTENANCE IS NECESSARY. CONCRETE COLLAR PAVEMENT CONCRETE SLAB 8" (200 mm) MIN THICKNESS FLEXSTORM CATCH IT PART# 6212NYFX WITH USE OF OPEN GRATE 6" (150 mm) INSERTA TEE PART# 6P26FBSTIP* INSERTA TEE TO BE CENTERED ON CORRUGATION CREST TWO LAYERS OF ADS GEOSYNTHETICS 315WTK WOVEN GEOTEXTILE BETWEEN FOUNDATION STONE AND CHAMBERS 5'(1.5 m) MIN WIDE CONTINUOUS FABRIC WITHOUT SEAMS - 18" (450 mm) MIN WIDTH CONCRETE COLLAR NOT REQUIRED FOR UNPAVED APPLICATIONS 12" (300 mm) NYLOPLAST INLINE DRAIN BODY W/SOLID HINGED COVER OR GRATE _x PART# 2712AG61 P* SOLID COVER: 1299CGC* GRATE: 1299CGS `� II 10 0 ii i 6" (150 mm) SDR35 PIPE SC -740 CHAMBER * THE PART# 2712AG61PKIT CAN BE USED TO ORDER ALL NECESSARY COMPONENTS FOR A SOLID LID INSPECTION PORT INSTALLATION SC -740 6" INSPECTION PORT DETAIL NTS Q r n J W J � � J co W p o z W 0 U U C Q W _ ~ p ti p U o U U ° U ti 0 O 00 _ O\ Z M � 0 J � 0 O Lo (n U = — W W w 0 > Q W p J J Q U) W W zU) C5 z Z LU W :�i 0 Z W UQ_ W 0 0 WU' U F - F_ cf) �5w W WLu p =O F� W 0 >—z F zZ W z Uo WF— Y a -_j 2LLJ D () F- (D F— LU U W Uj o °g � W W J 2 m Q W °J 0 a OQ � J WJ W Q Z_ F- U W Z LU o W � U UJ cz Z o U H W W F- F- � OW 0 �0 C J O (nF- .o = F -W Q Y F-0 o 0v zQ J Ep W F--- Q N W 0 0 N z W 00 0 0 0 010 W W o ° F- ~ � — U 00 0 00 W W O — 0 0 � � � U) Z 0 U Qo 00 O° �0� Oa W W 0= o'~ F- 0 0�Q J O zF- m M O W ZQLr � _ M ow W 0 ti �o Dpco �Qti ow J p 0 (D co mw Z 00 ® aw z a-0 W W W F_ w z cn wW = mF— LLJ W Q QO z = } D z J U > m �zz Z p � d Q V) 2 W F- 0� SHEET C7 OF C8 INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 94 a P NOES• R IND OCA'\ON8'( REFEREN NEED C4 `5 F\NA 6E NER\F\EO O Sl-, I oA oE� AN S\A sl Sl A�\0 OWNER. N X00 50 0 FEES 50 tN S�P�E A thot �erttty or erebY rre en d ed tt,r Por dUy �\ of 0.%r 2-1 of the Stote e 1 w os 0000 or rep dth°t to00 r, sPe��Vxlrco super under°the tows this P rM d'�r tree u?der s osr°t Er\9 / / Pr°fe DE'D gy�. -\ AE DRAWN 6y'. -\ AE CHECKED 8�'• `"ntLSEA ROAD 000�� 6jfs()�\Sur se°y a 5530 akarss a"d ka, Mir 2�,p520 ,Tne Ar° 63 4 oro C\�ruCst°r 5866 F AXandeCs°r.c 3601 63, 42� hakars°r, www' aMP�NG C � P pR��N EASE WORD-� SOON �Xp AN G S\Vr EX\Sl\N \N \N 10 REM P `ACE AL\'ON 2 12 / AN S\�E` MoN�\�E��O, �F N ,Sol A MSN SNEER Ca ov C8 SNEERS 3395 •p5 - N X00 50 0 FEES 50 tN S�P�E A thot �erttty or erebY rre en d ed tt,r Por dUy �\ of 0.%r 2-1 of the Stote e 1 w os 0000 or rep dth°t to00 r, sPe��Vxlrco super under°the tows this P rM d'�r tree u?der s osr°t Er\9 / / Pr°fe DE'D gy�. -\ AE DRAWN 6y'. -\ AE CHECKED 8�'• `"ntLSEA ROAD 000�� 6jfs()�\Sur se°y a 5530 akarss a"d ka, Mir 2�,p520 ,Tne Ar° 63 4 oro C\�ruCst°r 5866 F AXandeCs°r.c 3601 63, 42� hakars°r, www' aMP�NG C � P pR��N EASE WORD-� SOON �Xp AN G S\Vr EX\Sl\N \N \N 10 REM P `ACE AL\'ON 2 12 / AN S\�E` MoN�\�E��O, �F N ,Sol A MSN SNEER Ca ov C8 SNEERS 3395 •p5 n / N Q) HJ 11 Ill \ III �q PF 28 EM /48 MK 40 NP 6 O \ a/ n/ � 111 III \ III III III II I II I II I II III III III III II III � III III III II I II I ul III III III III III III II III III III I I II I II I II I II III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III I I II I II I II I III II III III III III III III III II III II I II I II I II I nl III III III I I III III III III III III III II I II I n II III III III III III III III III III II I II I II I II I II I / III III III III III III III 8" II / a II I II I II I __J III 4 _ III 6„ II I C H EL S E A ROADB III \ 2" a \ \ 6zz° j \zz \ \ \ \\\\\``\\ zz 30 0 30 60 \ SCALE IN FEET \ - DATE REVISION DESIGNED BY: TAE DRAWN BY: TAE CHECKED BY: CJJ REQUIRED PLANT MATERIALS 10 CALIPER INCHES OF TREES PER ACRE + 2 SHRUBS PER 10 L.F. OF BUILDING PERIMETER SITE AREA = 5.95 ACRES 10 X 5.95 = 59.2 CALIPER INCHES OF TREES REQUIRED 12 EXISTING TREES WITH 48 ACI TOTAL REQUIRED ADDITIONAL TREES = 11.5 ACI ADDITIONAL TREES PROVIDED = 6 = 12.0 ACI ACTUAL BUILDING PERIMETERS = 6958 L.F. = 1392 SHRUBS BLDG 1 = 276 L.F. BLDG 2 = 336 L.F. 276+336=612/10 = 61.2 X 2 = 122.4 SHRUBS REQUIRED 127 SHRUBS PROVIDED PLANT LIST: Site Plantings QTY. KEY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE/ROOT TREES 6 NP Pinus resinosa Norway Pine 6' B&B 6=12 ACI 11 HJ Juniperus horizontalis 'Hughes' Hughes Juniper 5 Gal. Pot 28 PS Panicum virgatum 'Shenandoah' Purple Foliage Switch Grass 3 Gal. Pot 48 EM Lonicera x xylosteum 'Emerald Mound' Emerald Mound Honeysuckle 5 Gal. Pot 40 MK Syringa patula 'Miss Kim' Miss Kim Lilac 5 Gal. Pot 127 PROVIDED (122 REQUIRED) PLANTING NOTES: Contractor shall provide one year guarantee of all plant materials. The guarantee begins on the date of the Landscape Architect's written acceptance of the initial planting. Replacement plant materials shall also have a one year guarantee commencing upon planting. All plants to be northern—grown and hardy. Plants to be installed as per standard AAN planting practices. Use minimum 12" loam planting soil on trees and 6" on shrubs. Contractor shall verify locations with all utililies prior to installation of plants. Irrigation shall be manually provided by the Owner. Contractor shall water all new plants until accepted by by the Owner Staking of trees optional; reposition if not plumb after one year. Wrap all smooth—barked trees—fasten top and bottom. Remove by April 1. Open top of burlap on BB materials; remove pot on potted plants; split and break apart peat pots. Prune plants as necessary — per standard nursery practice. Owner shall be responsible for maintenance after acceptance of the work by the Owner. Plants shall be immediately planted upon arrival at site. Properly heel—in materials if necessary. All disturbed areas to be sodded unless otherwise noted. Sod shall be northern grown and hardy. Planting beds for shrubs shall have (4 oz. min.) weed barrier fabric, 4" — 5" of 1-1/2" washed River Rock mulch and 4" vertical (commercial grade) black poly edging. The edging shall be placed and staked with smooth curves. Field adjust tree and shrub locations to fit uility locations and any changes that may have occured to the site plan and/or grading plan. Construction and soil types to be determined by the site Engineer. 8' STEEL STAKE �y\ 18' POLYPROPYLENE OR - POLYETHYLENE (40 MIL. 1-1/2' WIDE STRAP TYP.) DOUBLE STRAND 14 GA. WIRE - 3' O 120' INTERVAL (TYP.) TREE WRAP TO FIRST BRANCH TURNBUCKLE WITH DOUBLE STRAND #14 GAUGE WIRE - 3 PER TREE FINAL GRADE OF PLANT TO EQUAL ORIGINAL GRADE LAYER OF SHREDDED HARDWOOD H IN SAUCER -EXTEND PAST STAKE 2'x2"x30' STAKES SET 120' APART OUTSIDE THE BALL AT ANGLE - 3 PER TREE BACKFILL WITH PLANTING SOIL MAINTAIN PEDESTAL OF NOTES: TWO ALTERNATE METHODS OF TREE STAKING ARE SHOWN. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S OPTION TO STAKE TREES: HOWEVER, THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTAINING TREES IN A PLUMB POSITION THROUGHOUT THE GUARANTEE PERIOD. SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF HOLE PRIOR TO PLANTING CONIFER TO HAVE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. NO MULCH TO BE IN CONTACT WITH TRUNK CONIFEROUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL Hakanson Anderson Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors 3601 Thurston Ave., Anoka, Minnesota 55303 763-427-5860 FAX 763-427-0520 www.hakanson—anderson.com BRODSHO CONSULTING Landscape Architecture Site Planning 698 NORTHBRIDGE COURT EAGAN, MN 55123 PHONE: 651-688-8023 FAX: 651-994-4792 I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. er _)e00 A coaK� Debra Brodsho REG. N0. 23849 DATF 7-10-17 POLYPROPYLENE OR _YETHYLENE (40 MIL. 1-1/2- E STRAP TYP.) LE STRAND 14 GA. WIRE - 120" INTERVAL (TYP.) WRAP TO FIRST BRANCH BUCKLE WITH DOUBLE STRAND AUGE WIRE - 3 PER TREE LAYER OF SHREDDED HARDWOOD I IN SAUCER -EXTEND PAST STAKE GRADE OF PLANT TO ORIGINAL GRADE x30" STAKES SET 120" APART DE THE BALL AT ANGLE - 3 PER BACKFILL WITH PLANTING SOIL MAINTAIN PEDESTAL OF UNDISTURBED SOIL NOTES: TWO ALTERNATE METHODS OF TREE STAKING ARE SHOWN. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S OPTION TO STAKE TREES: HOWEVER, THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTAINING TREES IN A PLUMB POSITION THROUGHOUT THE GUARANTEE PERIOD. SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF HOLE PRIOR TO PLANTING. DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL CAMPING WORLD EAST PARKING LOT EXPANSION NOTES: HAND LOOSEN ROOTS OF CONTAINERIZED MATERIAL (TYP.). SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF HOLE PRIOR TO PLANTING. SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL LANDSCAPE PLAN CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA LAYER OF SHREDDED HARDWOOD iIN SAUCER -EXTEND PAST STAKE GRADE OF PLANT TO ORIGINAL GRADE BACKFILL WITH PLANTING SOIL MAINTAIN PEDESTAL OF UNDISTURBED SOIL ZING OF SHRUB IN BED TO TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER DIMENSION FROM EDGE SHEET L1 L1 SHEETS 3395.05 0) 3 -o Z a_ 0 Fy LLQ 0 E- 0 = I 0 0 W / 0 .L � E .S-- 0 m- 0 0 -D= In Q� CO 0 0 0 I 0) 'a CD 0 N 0 C'r, 00 N 0'--' CAMP NG WORLD A E L GHT NG MONTICELLO, MN © copyright 2017 - L!(PB Engineers, /nC. Rochester, MN 507-424-6840 �� St. Paul, MN 651-633-1223 C.o C.o C.o C.o C.o C.o C.o C.o C.o C.o C.o C.o C.o C.o C.o C.o C.o C.o C.o C.o C.o C.o C.o C.o C.o C.o C.o C.o C.o C. C.o C.o C.o C.o C.o C.o C.o C.o C.o c.o 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 ---_----_ www.lkpb.com C.o C.o C.o C.0 C.o C.o C.o C.o C.o C.0 C.o C.o C.o C.o C.o C.0 C.o C.o C.o C.o C.o C.0 C.o C.o C.o C.o C.o C.o C. C.o C.o C.o C.o C.0 C.o C.o C.o C.o C.0 C.o 3.0 \ \ 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 C.o C.0 C.o C.0 C.o C.o C.o C.o C.o C.0 C.o C.o C.o C.o C.o C.0 C.o C.o C.o C.o C.o C.0 C.o C.o C.o C.o C.o C. C.o C.o C.o C.o C.o C.0 C.o C.o C.0 C.o C.0 C.o 3.0 3.0 3� 3.0 \ 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 C.0 C.0 C.o C.o C.o C.0 C.0 C.o C.o C.o C.o C.0 C.0 C.o C.o C.o C.0 C.0 C.0 C.o C.o C.o C.0 C.0 C.o C.o c. C.o C.0 C.0 C.0 C.o C.o C.o C.o C.0 C.0 C.o C.o C.o 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 � 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 C.0 C.0 C.o C.o C.o C.0 C.0 C.o C.o C.o C.o C.0 C.0 C.o C.o C.o C.0 C.0 C.0 C.o c o C.o C.0 C.0 C.o c. C.o C.o C.0 C.0 C.0 C.o C.o C.o c. C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3\3.�s 0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 C.o C.o C.o C.o C.o C.o C.o C.o C.o C.o C.o C.o C.o C.o C.o C.o C.o C.o C.o C.o C.o C.o c.o C.o C C.o C.o C.o C.o C.0 C.o C.o C.o C.o C.o C.o C.o C.o C.o 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 ..0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.o C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.o C.o C.o C.o C. C.1 C.1 C.1 C.1 C.1 C.1 C.1 C.1 C.0 C.o C.0 C.o C.0 C.o C.o 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3. 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.1 C.1 C C.1 C.2 C. ^ +�3 C.3 C.3 C.2 C.1 C.1 C.1 C.1 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 + 0 \ 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 CAMPING WORLD SITE C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.1 C.1 C.2 C.4 C. /1.0 1.0 \ C.7 C.7 C.5 C.2 C.1 C.1 C.1 C.0 C.0 C.o c.o c.0 3.0 3.0 0. 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.�O�Q _ +0.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 . \0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 LIGHTING / W C.0 C.0 C.o C.o C.o C.0 C.0 C.o C.o C.o C.o C.0 C.0 C.o C.o C.o C.0 C.0 C.1 C.1 C C.2 C.9 1. / 4 4.9 3. 4.1 'tea \>� 2.3 1.2 c.5 C.2 C.1 C.1 C.0 C.o c.o c.o 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3. 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 1.o ' 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 +.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3801 CHELSEA ROAD W. --// 4 MONTICELLO, MN C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.1 C.1 c C.2 1.0 2A/ 29. 11.5 4.8 8.E 2'.3 - \- 1.4 1.0 C.4 C.2 C.1 C.1 C.0 C.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 0. 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 A ---- , C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.1 C.1 C C.2 c.7 2. / 2 .6 5 C 12. 6.8 '1.' 23.8 6.3 '1_.5 29. 1D+2 \ +.2 1.1 C.4 C.2 C.1 C.1 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 91 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.1 C.1 C C.2 1.0 2 ,9 %1C.2 +3.4 .7 .3 1.9 8.5 11.6 L6.4 26.7 S.8 49.4 \ 27u i.7 1.2 c.5 C.2 3.1 3.1 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 0. 0.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0\3. 00 +.0 �.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 / k \ C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.1 .1 + C.2 C.9 2. / d_.1 21.4 17.9 +4.1 9.8 8.1 7.1 8.1 10.1 i, 1 12.7 32.9 72.6 58.9 + + 5 6. 2.6 1.0 0.4 0.2CH/IN 11NK 0.1 3.1 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 +.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 \ 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 A \ RIGHT OF wAY+FENCE + C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.1 .1 C C.2 C.7 1� 1 93. 60.7 16.7 +0.7 8.2 6.9 4.0 3.; 5.0 6.6 6.7 9.5 15.0 16.6 23.4 26.5 58.6 +�:9 1.8 1 0.6 0.2 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0� 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 \ C.0 C.0 C.o C.o C.o C.0 C.0 C.o C.o C.o C.o C.0 C.1 .1 C C.2 1.0 2 /8 4 58. 23. +3.9 8.1 6.2 3.4 1.8 1.5 2.1 3.2 5.1 7.1 9.4 10.5 1 .3 13.0 3_.E 61.8 9_.7 24.0 '.. +.8 1.0 3.7 3.3 3.2 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 +.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0�;Zo 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR / -- - REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT C.o C.o C.o C.o C.o C.o C.o C.o C.o C.o C.o C.1 .1 C C.z i.o 3 /' +3.c .E 1 6 +3.9 9.6 �.0 3s- C.7 C.6 C.e i.3 2.2 3.e 6.0 �.z \�." +oa i3.e 14.2 i8.c 26.9 67.5 �a1 i.i i.o 3.4 3.2 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 0. 3.0 3.0 3 0 3 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.�`s.o 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.° SUPERVISION, AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED Swl'iII1TC;H'ED OUT \ PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE /+� THE EXI�TUI� G � � OF MINNESOTA C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.1 .1 C.3 C.7 2 104 60.2 +6.5 0.0 �.8 6.9 3.6 ;•`8 C.7 C.5 C.� C.5 C.8 1.3 2.1 3.2 3 9 + 1 9.8 12.6 30.1 50.3 33.9 3..7 +.5 i.l 3.6 3.2 3.z 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3 0 0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.1 .1 C.2 1.1 2. / %10. 53.3 20.9 +3.7 8.0 6.1 3.6 1.8 1.8 c.5 C.4 C.` C t :.8 i.5 3.0 %l.l 3.0 + 7 12.7 12.1 15.0 29.1 8C.8 30. '' 5. 2.8 1.3 3.6 3.4 3.2 3.1 3.1 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3 OT�f,� .°A I �U�ESO 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.O .Q 3.0 - \� WITH LEFTOVER DATE: / /17 REG. No.: 23791 RENEWAL DATE: 06/30/18 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.1 C.1 C.1 .1 C.2 1.0 3 / / 5 8 26. 15. +3.9 10.2 '1.5 3.8 1.7 C.8 i..., C.4 I f A C.' c 5 ;.8 2.0 %1.6 1 .9 A ^ 9.5 13.6 19.3 30.8 26.5 43.4 + E �.4\+ 1.8 1.2 3.6 3.2 3.1 3.1 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 :.0 3 01,9", A b" � �+1.p` E 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.1 C.1 C.1 .1 / C.2 C.7 1. / .3 .2 1 +1.9 9.i 9.0 5.3 3.1 1.4 C.8 �:.5 C.4 C.4 c. +�5 C.7 i.5 4.7 15. F1V 8. 9.3 1_.2 12.5 12.0 27.0 63.4 55.4 28 \ 23.4 1.9 3.6 3.2 3.1 3.1 3.0 3.0 3.0 + .0 3.1 3 0��� s" OIOvO OFMRVOVNO OU 3.o 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.1 C.1 C.1 C.2 +.2 C.2 1.0�9 30.9 %19.4 +'.5 4.3 10.1 9.4 .s 5.2 2.8 i.5 C.� c.4 c.4 c I0 C.5 C.8 1.0 1.9 1.3 3.8 °a5A + 7 9.0 13.4 15. 18.9 + . %19.7 5 . 10 3 \i. 3.2 3.1 3.1 3.1 3. 3.0 3.C- 3 OL1�1JE3,0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 ALLEN V. THEISEN C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.1 C.1 C.2 C.4 C.9 2 / / 56.2 26.4 15.2 +3.3 10.3 ..3 8.4 8. E.8 4.1 1.8 1.1 C.9 C.8 C.7 C_ � 15 C.6 C.7 C.4 \ ° 8.6 9.4 9.8 +2.0 17.9 .6 36.2 A.8 i5. i.l 3.s + .1 3.1 3.1 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 DRAWING HISTORY: C.0 C.0 C.0 C.1 C.1 C.2 +.2 C.5 C.8 / 3. 66. 18.3 +0.7 7.8 8.0 8.6 15.6 32 7 pp 6.2 8.9 3.6 2.5 2.2 2.2 1.8 1.2 !-. - C.7 C. C. P + .6 6.2 6.4 9.2 1 .5 7,5 16.9 22.1 � .J i.4 3.5 3.3 3.2 0.1 3.1 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.1 C.2 +.3 C.4 C.7 1/ �/ .8 %1 4 2_. +3.4 8.7 6.6 5.2 +7.7 22. + .0 X43.8 12.1 9.5 3. +.2 9.1 3.0 1.7 1.1 C.8 C.8 1.2 1.8 2.4 \ 3.s 1.4 / 4,1 ,3 1_.8 15.4 24.9 51.8 8, 1.a 3.6 3.4 3,2 3,1 3.1 3.1 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 I NO ISSUE DATE A CHAIN SINK ISSUE FOR PERMIT / /17 R GHT F ° - - C.0 C.0 C.0 C.1 C.5 C.9 5.7 +.9 .9 +1.2 8.9 .s %1.2 3.4 .1 20.. 7: .4 12.3 5.0 5.! '.2l 5.1 2.4 1.3 i. i.2 2.0 3.5 9.0 6. 3.1 ° 3 3.s 3.7 1.8 8.8 13.6 28.6 83 27,1 2.4 3.9 0. 3.5 3.3 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 /+ AC EXISTINGY FN�E C.0 C.0 C.0 +.1 C.2 C.8 2 /+/ %1.9 6.0 6.4 .7 5.8 6.4 '4.s 3.1 2.6 3.8 8.- 1:.7 L2.0 6.5 5.s 10.0 X6.1 26.9 10.R 4.7 2.1 1.9 2.0 2.7 5.8 17. °3.1 a01 3.2 3.4 1.0 2.8 6.5 10.7 21.4 50.8 18.9 3. +.2 2.6 .4 .3 D OF M/NOUS ;,2 3.z 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.0 3.0 0.0 PROPERTY 0IOE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 - BUILDING C.0 C.0 +.0 C.1 C.2 13. 10. 10.2 .1 6.3 5.6 5.1 %1.0 3.5 3.i 3.9 5.1 5.x.5 %1.2 5.7 iL9 E. %�1 i7 2 ... 6.2• .5 4. 7.7 5.2 %1.2 �.0 ° .1 3.4 3. + .8 2.2 %1.8 6.9 i..1 22.8 12.6 8.1 + .3 23 ~ 10.7 2.4 .1 1. 3.5 3.3 3.2 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 _ 3801 Chelsea Rd. W. ------- --_ -----i - - - III C.0 0 C.0 C.0 c C.7 9 4 41_ 5.2 10.2 A.0.7- E7 -i:� 6.71�s2 =9-q- %1.3.6 -3,� 5.i-1...2 T�.g %15,Q �.9 6.3 L3.2 13.5 5.5 3. + 0 3.9 'O A. 3.7 3.9 2. 9.4 6.4 i-.2 23.4 23,4 15 13.9 30.9 65.5 27.2 9.2 �.8 A`4.7 1.9 1. +.9 3.4 3.2 3.1 3.1 3.1 �.1 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 +.0 C.0 C.0 C C.1/ C.5 2.9 1 - .2 32.1 11.7 8.0 9.5 13.R 27.x, 2E.3 ;3 ,6.9 7.3 2.i 2.2 2.6 3.�- 4 5.0 15.6 10.' 37. ).78 36.9 '1.7 ° a.9 1. 1.8 1.0 2.1 9.4 6.4 11. 4Y , 31 12.5 11.9 7.9 19.0 13.0 9. 54. 105 58.7 11.6 DGE4C�- 4.1 2.2 1 3.5 3.s 3.2 3.2 3.1 3.1 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 O `O / LO ° C BIrNMIN �+ V C.0 C.0 C,d C.0/ c.l C.2 1. \.1 33.1 27.6 9.; 6.8 12.7 33 72.I 6'.4 r.3 9.9 2.i 2.6 2.i 3.4 5.3 6.7 6_8 6.7 6. €.4 36.� 3C.2 36.8 7.a %1.8 .6a° 3�8 ° 9.4° --. \, + 8° 3 i 2.8 3.8 3.9 1.9 6.3 13. 37. %122 2 10.7 i_.5 i=.9 10.0 6.2 i=.8 27.5 40.3 3. 2 5 `47.7 23.4 2.0 1.8 2. 38 + 5 3.3 3.2 3.1 3.1 0.1 + 0 '�j �POSSD F4FOPQLE G _ a c.0 /C,(1\ C.O� "Ax� " C.0 C.1 C.1 C.4 1. 7.1 9.7 6.i 6.1 14.4 5..2 -- .8 10.8 10.3 3. :..3 %1.0 9.5 5.3 5.7 5.0 9.7 A15 '? 8 l3.`7 i3.O 13.3 5.4 3.i %1.0' 8.� 9.b \ O.°1 ° 1.s / 1. 1.6 3.8 3.8 1.8 3.i 5.2 8.5 18.6 7 9 .1 8.7 8.2 8.4 6.3 %l.a 5.8 10.3 16.7 i6.0 9.8 15.3 %10.4 .0 1_.9 20.0 6.5 %1.3 i.i i + .4 3.1 3.1 +0 3.0 3.0 c 0 C.y' c.\ c.0 C.1 C.1 C.2 C.5 %1.8 .2 12.9 2/.0 63.9 5-:.3 L8.7 .66 5.2 5. i ' .2 19.6 8.5 6.1 9.5 3.4 2.71T'-� 9.7 9.4 9.4 2.5 z� I.6 6 3'.3 ° 3a; ° +.9M ° �.5 i.i 1.1 1.0. 1. 3.9 5.6 9.2 22.8 +2 4 9 '7.4 5.a %1.8 3.5 3.6 i.7 12.3 22.0 23.5 15.6 8.9 9.9 - 15.3 lC.l 1_.0 17.6 C .R 21.6 10.6 1 1_.1 9,.8 .5 3.5 3.2 I O.@EgT k 111111111, 11111, 11 0 (P C.o� C.0 c. C.0 C.1 C.1 C.2 C.5 1.1 9.5 13.3 13.2 17.4 �i5 1�.4 '10.4 6.9 6.0-=}3 i.8 28.8 33.1 131- : %1.9 3.5 2.1 1.9 2. 2.0 1.7 1.5 2.2 ,f2 a3.6 ° 2.9 .2 ° 3.8 2.7 1.6 1.2 1 2.0 '4 /6.0 1_.0 %L. i3 36 8.6 5.5 3.9 2.1 2.2 16.4 '49. 5l 22.1 9.7 '1.5 8.9 9.4 8.1 'I.1 4 18.4 27.4 27.0 15.1 .8 10" 51.9 10.7 3.4 3.1 3.0 - 1II s . V C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0\ + 0 C.1 C.1 C.1 C.3 C 5. 35.8 3..5 18.E 13.3 .0 5.1 7.5 9 6 ?8.9 61. 84.: 7..0 3' 5.1 3.5 2.8 2.6 3.11 i.8 i.2 1.4 2.6 '° 10.7 1�.0 A .5 7.1 3.1 2.6 2.5 2.6 +.9 7.4 6.0 I -. 31.8 3 3 7.4 5.1 3.5 i.; 1.8 1.6 11.2 %18.� 52.3 20.1 .. 5.0 5.4 6.1 5.6 5.8 9.5 15.4 17.7 15. + 4 9.4 20.7 39.2 4-.1 16.9 5.0 1.2 � 0.1 3.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0\ C.1 \,C.1 C.2 C.8 3.8 AtlC.9 19.3 13.8 10.2 6.i 4 4 +4.� 9 2 .33.4 84. I 8. I 5!.1 +14.3 5.3 %1.4 '4.` 5.2 �8 '4.l 1.3 1.2 2.3 a 1. 9.0 9 %1.5 %1.5 5." 8.s ".6 5.6 .0 5.4 �.8 17.1 - 6 2 + 2 6.2 %1.2 3.3 1.6 1.8 1.1 10.5 25.2 26.6 12.7 5.' 2.9 2.4 2.6 3.2 5 5 12.5 30.5 38..5 20.2 10.4 8.3 1-.1 1 . +0.3 3.8 2.6 1.0 '_I 3.2 3.1 C.0 C.0 C.0 + 0 C.0 \+C�. `C.1 C.i\ C.2 C.5 1 .7 69.4 27.1 14.0 10.9 9.1 6.0 5.5 8. 5.1 +43.2 1 SC.i 2L3 iII.9_ 5.9 6.2 11.1 1..4 '113.5 1.9 1.4 2. ° 3.4 A + °%l. 3.s %1.2 5 1_.7 2 .3 18.4 12.8 6.8 6.8 9.4 20.6 9 5 7 6.5 %1.6 3.1 i.5 i.5 3.0 6.7 10.8 1_.0 �.9 3.f 1.8 1.2 i.2 i.i 4 2 12.9 40.8 %19W 26.R 10.E +'.1 +'.2 �.4 5.6 3.2 1. 3.6 3.2 3.1 \, (� I C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 + .0 C� C.1 'E.3 1. %1.4 23.2 20.0 15.1- .6 11.1 8.5 8.6 8.7 10.3 -133 14.3 11 .5 i.3 5.5 �%3 10 1 I.O �'.�I. 3.0 1.9 2.3 2.7 ° 1. .3 C .1 4 3.2 2.6 2.9 3.6 6.9 .1 -.'R' 23. + .8 8.4 i2. %10.il, %� 35 8.2 5.2 3.5 i.6 i.5 2.8 6.5 10.2 1_.0 �.5 3.' l.i 1.0 3.9 i.4 3 9 12.5 31.4 %1C.9 22.2 8.4 %1.0 3.3 3.7 3.3 2.0 1.1 3.5 3.1 3.1 \ I a e Oe C. C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C. C.0 C.1 �C.5 +.9 10.5 28.1 %L.9 2:.8 F"" 10.6 10.0 11.0 10.3 '+.9 6--�5 5 11.3 %1.1 t'.5 10 7 11.6II 1�I.l 27.9 3.1 2.3 3.5 %1.2 3.3 ° 1.8 C.9 °C.4 , 3.9 2.1 1.a 1.5 1.8 2.4 %1.3 15.1 8.3 37 5 5. 9. 8.i 12. 36.8 I 619 3- 6 +'.5 5.0 3.4 1.6 1.; 1.2 12.1 33.9 37.9 15.4 5.I 2.0 1.0 3.9 i.4 2 8 �.2 +C.6 16.3 1_.3 +4.; 2.3 i.6 i.3 i.1 1.0 3.8 3.5 \ . 3.1 3.1 B LIM I1�,�� . \ C.0 + 0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C. C.1 C.2 3.1 -.0 6 I.0 27.4 16.2 16.1 13.3 11.5 9,9 '+.8 5.4 3.8 %1_0 +'.1 +9 it %1.43j-� 16.0 2.7 3.3 6.5 +7.3 6.4 2.9 i.2 C.5 C.4 O.i a 1.2 3.a 3,a i.1 i.4 2.5 6.5 10.4 1_.4 +7.0 +7.2 +7.1 8.0 16.2 5,3 6 5.a %1.0 3.1 i.5 i.5 3.8 12.1 3C. 37.7 15.2 5.l i.9 3.9 3.8 i.3 2 6 5.5 +9.8 10.1 8.5 %1.1 i.9 3.9 3.5 3.4 3.4 3.3 3.s 3.1 3.1, F bC.O C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.1 C.3 C.9 1 .\ 17. '.3 35.0 +47.31 95.. 1 .5 � 12.5 10.9,q 8.5 6.3 4 5.; 8.2-]5 116.8 y .11 5.6 3.5 +7.1 1!.4 2.0 i�� 6.6 2.0 C.8 C.6 i 3.i 3.6 3.6 3.i 1.3 2.1 3.1 3.6 3.a 5.3 6.2 8.3 17.3 1 3 - 6.1 %1.1 3.0 1.5 1.6 1.3 12.9 36.8 39.6 17.0 5.I 2.0 1.0 3.9 i.4 2 8 +7.o +C.3 15.9 i=.1 %1.5 i.9 3.8 3.4 3.s 3.2 3.2 3.1N 'IJ 3.1 3.1 C.0 �.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.1 C.1 C.9 1.7 + .8 9. .5 28.9 17.3 � ` 10.7 8.2 9.5 11.6 13.4 :� - 26.A 7.4 9.8 3:'.9 9.B 32.4 9.4 2. ,+.9 C.6 ( �3.5 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.5 + .5 3. i 3.8 1.1 1.4 2.5 %1.8 6.3 1- 38.6 I 0 8 32 +'. i 5.0 3.3 1.6 1.5 3.0 6.9 1_.9 12.1 8.4 3.' 1. i 3.9 3.8 i.3 +3 i 12.1 33.8 +43..9 21.3 +7.s 2.2 3.8 3.4 3.2 3.1 3.1 3.1" III. 3.1 3.0 V B + .0 C.0 C.0 C.0 F�E� C. C. C.0 !0 + 1 C.1 C.2 C.7 1.7 5.0 2 . .5 6_.1 +70.7 32.: 1.�5 3.4 12.8 14.7 iS.R /24.1 X3.3 26.R %1.6 +9.7 2 :?x'16.4 27.2 +9.1 2.; =1 C.8 �0.7 0.8 3.8 3.8 3.7 3. 3 i 3.6 3.9 2.0 %1.2 6.0 i_. 39.8 = 6 3 +7.8 5.0 3.2 i.5 i.5 3.0 6.5 10.4 10.6 +7.8 3.f i.6 3.8 3.i i.l 3 2 i=.4 38.0 %16.9 23.6 +6.8 2.0 3.6 3.3 3.2 3.1 3.1 3.1 �1 3.0 3.0 March 0 2 / / C.0 C.0 +.0 C.0 c c. c C. C.0 + 0 C.0 C� C.1 C.1 C.2 1.2 2.0 �%l.l '- 2 +49. L 3f .9 8.8 18.2 +7.1 1//4.j1 17.9 "3 )C 15.3 3.2 %1.9 1:.4 .4.9 11.1 �2 1.1 _s 1.2 ) 1 1 2.4 2.5 1.5 1.2 1.0 3. +.5 3.i 1.8 3.6 5.1 8.3 18.2 C 6 6.2 %1.2 2.9 1.5 1.; 3.6 9.5 18.8 19.9 i.8 +4.' i.8 3.9 3.; 1.0 2 5 8.2 24.6 32.1 iC.5 5.5 i.6 3.5 3.3 3.2 3.1 3.1 3.1 ). 3.1 3.0 ' C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 c. .0 C.0 C. C.0 C. C.0 C.0 .0 C.� C.1 +.1 C.1 C.2 1.3 2. 1.2 :.7 78.7 55.6 �,d3 3_.8 12.7 2.9 3.2 5 3 i.6 5.0 2.6 1. ��2.1 3.0 6. 9.0 8.8 7.2 2.5 i.8 3,9 3. 3 i 3.5 4.; v +7.2 15.9 {.511 1 5.6 3.8 2.9 1.a 1.5 1.3 15.0 98. 5 19.6 5.E i.8 3.8 3.6 3.; +1 5 3.6 6.2 +7.3 5.5 25 1.0 3.5 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.a 3.a IJ 3.2 3.1 2017 /` C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 c C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 c. C.0 C.0+.1 �1 C 1 C.2 C. +.6 1.2 1. 6 +61.1 24./ 13 6 .� 64.1 24.4 3.2 2.7 3.8 Y� 3.i 2.4 1.: _., 3.; .6 26. 10.2 %1.8 2.9 1.3 3.6 3.9 2. + 2 5.9 1-. 31.8 {55 2 30 +7.0 +4.7 3.0 1.3 1.4 3.9 13.2 +481 53.2 19.2 5.' +1.7 3.i 3.5 3.; 1 2 2.2 3.7 %1.2 3.2 1.8 1.2 3.8 3.; i.0 i.8 2.5 1.8 1 3.5 3.s IC -0- /y� B 20 0\ C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 . �&�. C.0 C. C.0 C. C.1 C.1 C.1 c.l C.2 C. C.6 i.4 1 . 1 1 .5/+ +78. 27.E 2.8 1.9 2.8 3.9 %1.5 3.3 �.y +,.4 +4.; +'.6 33. B 7 13 2 3.5 1.5 3.a 1.2 2.5 %1.8 G.7 1_. %12.4 2 3 +'.a 4.; 3.0 1.3 1.2 3.1 8.6 21.3 22.4 10.7 +4.1 i.4 3.i 3.6 3.8 +1 1 2.0 2.4 2.7 2.6 2.9 2.9 2.3 2.3 +7.4 23 .3 23.9 ). 2.9 3.8 /� 1 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C. CO 0 C.0 + 0 C.0 C. C. C.1 C.1 C.1 C. C.2 1.1 2.5 .6 8 ., + - 8.7 + .4 2.0 1.7 .2 5.2 +7.0 +7.2 5.S S.z �.4 +7.4 21.1 3:.1 27.6 10.6 3.s + 9 1.5 2.2 %1.1 6.5 8.0 12.1 25.5 1.1 16.5 5.5 3.5 2.3 1.1 3,9 L.8 A.1 6.8 6.8 5.1 2.' i.5 1.0 3.9 i.3 2 4 3.3 2.7 3.0 8.2 23 21.E 13.7 23.3 37.6 +75.2 38.3 L-.1 3.1 1.0 • O �� 1 F �4 C S�� C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 +.0 C.0 C. C� C. C. C.1 c.l C.1 C.2 C.4 3.0 +4.1\ 6.0 2. 5.5 1.6 6.5 9.7 13.L 10.9 9.1 9.1 +7.3 6.3 S I( .4 1.7 %1.6 2.8 ' +.8 5. +0.4 i3.0 12.7 17.0 29.5 =.6 G.3 2.7 2.0 i.i i.0 i.2 L.8 3.1 %l.l %1.5 %1.0 %l.( %1.2 2.6 3.1 10.6 - 7.0 24.E iC.2 25.8 62.0 +75.1 37.5 iC.2 12.5 19.3 16.9 i=.6 i 2.5 1.0 ON - Op g1-1 1TOMINOOS C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 + .0 C.0 + .0 C.1 C.1 C.3 C.8 1.6 2.1 3.s 1.5 .1 18.7 +40.2 33.L 1,� 4.2 12.0 10.5 8.9 +7.6 5 6 1.4 2.5 2.0 2.': 3.4 r.9 3 .8 33.5 -+24.� 33.1 +7C.0 + 6.3 3.4 + + i.i i.6 2.4 7.1 5.4 7.6 +6.1 i + .4 75. D0 23.3 13.8 26.2 62.9 +72.8 3..8 13.3 13.6 21.2 18.0 12.1 +7.8 +6.9 +9.3 +9.5 +7.9 71 2.3 i.2 - $ '� This document may be an electronic file or may be C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 c.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 c.0 c.0 c.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.D�C_0 C.0 C.0 c.0 c.0 C.0 C.2 C C.8 C.8 C. C.5 C.5 1.8 1 l 414 5.3 17.4 1+5.1 10.9 9.1 8.5 5.8 3:i 2.7 2.'1 %1.4 �.0 22.2 54.1 3_.6 38.6 9� 2� 4 %l.s %1.5 %l.i %l.l +65 SC.0 24.7 16.8 3=.7 +69.1 +G5.2 23.4 1_.3 12.5 17.8 15.9 i=.3 +7.4 +7.2 �8 8 +6.1 5.5 +6.4 EDGIt.p - _ ; i.9 + ' BITUMINUUS° ` i printed from an electronic file provided to the user. It C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 .0 �Li+ 0��,Q_ C. C.1 ^.2 ^ 3 +.4 C.4 C.4 C.2 CS 2. 5.E7 + 4 X7.0 16L4.8 27.7 15.x+1<,7 1C.6 9.1 +7.9 55 9.-+5.0 �.3 183 9C.p 9'.6 27.7 30.2 52.5 L=.S 21.0 6. 61.3 25.5 17.4 3C.1 -I_.2 60.7 24.2 13.2 1C.5 16.6 15.6 1_.7 6.8 +.6 I 5.8 5.5 3.4 %1.7 3.4 1.3 +0.7 is the sole responsibility of the user to ensure that the 1% Q + a � ^ ` k� _ �HE-SEA R➢ W content and quality is consistent with the content and C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 c. C. + .2 C.2 . \1 C.1 C.2 i.3 2.9� 6.1 31.1 +48.8 +42." 29.3 15.8 13.3 10.8 -.7 8.- .e 6.2 +Y.r 15.4 18.6 16.8 21.4 3 .2 I _C.2 33.4 64.9 A9.6 20.0 1..3 15.3 ?0.7 27.1 23.2 15.1 1..0 1..4 10.6 .6 5.0 7 1 3227 GE 3.i 7.2 +6.3 +6.4 3.9 3.2 i.3 3.6 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C\ C.� C. C.1 C.1 �C.1 C.1 C. C.6 1.5 +7.5 8 11 9).1 21.6 17.0 13.9 L.5 10.6 9.6 8.0 9.K\ 12.0 15.2 28.7 65.7 2q�.3 1_.2 13.8 iC.2 i=.4 +9.5 12.4 ?2.3 T.1 %19.9 29.5 1_.4 +9.' +7.i 5.1 3.5 SINGLE $TOpRNOFFJ b- S, FT +6.2 12.7 13.8 12.3 3.8 i.8 3.i quality of the paper documents on file at LKPB \ \ / i� HB o B0ILDDJG FDO �� S S �' CONCRETE C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.1 C.1 C.1 1 C.O� c.0 C.1 C.1 C. C.8 i.3 + 2 8. + .3 63.7 %19.3 22.� 17 1 1�.2 12.6 i=.6 12.3 13.5 16. 3C.5 +9 _�5 .5 8.6 8.8 .6 8.0 10.5 ?0.3 50.8 53.0 3=.9 +9.5 +6. %l.l 2.4 i.3 3 3. G.1 iC.3 %15.0 36.4 %13.6 13.4 2.9 1.0 It ) � /+ { C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C C.0 C.1 C.1 C.2 C.8 i.i X3.3 +9.., 1 5_.f� %131 +v.6 19.1 15.0 15.9 L73 29.3 58.0 LE .4 G.6 6.4 5.8 5.z 5.5 +7.0 L..7 20.7 22.R i1.0 6.7 7.: 2.7 i.4 3.i 3. .s 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.4 i. +6.6 16.5 +64.+C 63.4 15.7 1 3.2 i.0 This Sheet may be a SEDGE N Reduced Copy. BITUMINOOS C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C. C.0 + 0 C.0 1 C.1 C.2 3.8 1.8 7.i 17. + 4 + .1 38.8 26.3 20s 19.0 L5.8 21.8 36.4 L,3 �.s +6.2 7.6 3.i 3.i 7.5 I.i 8.i 9.9 9.0 +6.5 3.F 2.7 i.6 3.i 3.s 3.2 3.1 3.1 3.2 3.s 1.1 3.2 6:®NCROTFE 56.3 68.6 54.9 15.5 6 3.1 i.0 e® The bar above is 1" long on a Full Size Sheet. C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C. C.0 +.0 C.0 C.1 + 1 +.1 3.2 1.2 1.; 4.2 +155.. +1'9.1 +75.4 ^66.. 28.6 L8.5 30.6 63.3 I L�,.1 10.2 8.6 6.0 %1.4 %1.3 5.8 7.2 8.a 13.7 16.3 15.4 +7.F +4.1 2.4 i.0 3.s 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.s 3.8 2.2 B.D;Oo 19.7 21.3 19.1 +7.6 3 2.1 3.i Drawing Scales apply to Full Size Sheets. C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 + 0 C. 3.1 3.1 3.2 i.l 2.0 + .8 13.6 ^ t C.7 10.8 +40.1 1ilI C 16.6 13.8 8.3 %1.6 +4.; +'.3 1_.2 1C.8 35.7 +49.4 62.8 iC.8 6.3 3.5 i.3 3.4 3.2 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.2 3.6 1.3 2.2 3.6 +'.2 +7.1 +7.1 3.5 � 1.3 3.5 E7 oNc nL C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C. C.0 + .0 3.1 3. .1 3.1 3.2 3.9 1.7 6.5 0. --LI 3_. 5�.2 71.6 35.7 1_.6 %1.9 5.6 10.8 17.3 19.6 %L.3 55.0 +48.7 17.9 +7.; %1.1 1.6 3.6 3.2 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.2 301D 1 2.1 3.3 3.5 3.2 2.1 1` +'J.9 +'J.5 \�, BusIriess scale: AS NOTED C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 + 0 3. 3 3.0 3.1 3/1 . 3.1 3.2 1.0 �I6n + 2 i 3 23.0J 2 .9 .1 47.9 15.3 +7.2 12.8 27.9 37.3 27.1 29.7 32.7 27.1 13.6 +6.5 3.i I. 7, 3.6 0 3 3.2 3.1 3 .e 3. 3,9 i.2 i.2 i.2 3.8 31 3.5 3.s C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 3.0 +.0 3. 3.1 3.1\ 0.� 3.2 3.5 1.33 + 7 .4 5.6 2. 7 3 3. .6 2 9 .3 +73.7 65.5 %19.5 25.1 9.4 7.5 2.4 i.l 3.5 3.2 i AGE 0.3 0.s 0.4 0.3 0.s OI 0.2 0.2 drawn by: TVB F 0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 +.0 0. 3.0 + 1 3.1 \ 3.s i i.l i.3 3.8 0. 0++ �3.47TuAll (/ 38.6 1_.9 3.7 1.6 3.i 3.s 3.2 X0.1 SIN PR MSP Op_4,3 ORQ, FT. c� Foo �, b.1 b.1 b.1 b.1 b.1 b b.1 b.1 checked by: AVT RB l C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 C.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 +.1 3.2 3.5 3/4� 3.5 + 5 3.3 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.i 1.5 2.3 3:£ i- 1_.1 .4 2.5 / 1.0 Ep[,6 OF 0.s 3.1 .1 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.0 3.0 ) 3 3.1 3.0 \ BITUMINOUS date: -/-/17 J" DGE OF BI uwmou EXTERIOR LIGHT FIXTURE SCHEDULE C.6 3.1 3.3 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.1 3.1 3.1 °.3E 1.2 1.3 1.1 3 3.2 3.1 3.1 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 '.0 .o 31 3.0 3.0 oN REE G RB q°"B \ project contact: DONOVAN GESKE LETTER FIXTURE MOUNTING LAMP LENS/ MANUFACTURER & REMARKS .0 C.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3•0 3•0 3.1 3.1 . 3.1 °. 3.1 3.1 3.0 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.3 0.2 3.2 3.1 +.1 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3. 3.0 3., 3[ 3.0 3.0 (donovan.geske@lkpb.com) TYPE TYPE DIFFUSER CATALOG NUMBER .6 C.6 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 °. +.1 3.0 3.0 3.0 + 1 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 °. 3.0 3.0 3.0 + 0 + 0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3. 3.0 3. 3. 3.0 3.0 \ Iproject no: 2017. .00 A SITE POLE 1000W - LUMARK LANDAU REUSE EXISTING LIGHT FIXTURE .o C.0 b.0 b.0 +0.0 b.0 b.0 +0.0 b.0 b.0 +0.0 b.0 b.1 b.1 b.0 +0.0 b.0 +0.0 b.0 � b.0 b.0 +0.0 b.1 +.0 b.0 b.0 b.0 b.0 b.0 b.0 b.0 b.0 b.0 b.0 b.0 b.0 0.0 ``\. ..0 0' .0 � 1 �.o� m CONCRETE \ LIGHTING 22'-d" POLE METAL HALIDE MHLDFT1000 .6 C.6 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 0 b:0�3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 G0.0 3.0 . 3.0 3.0 3.0 .0 Yo ° 3.0 3.0 3.0 sheet title STANDARD 2'I FOUNDATION ---� SOI DOUBLE HEADS) .6 C.6 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 0 3.0 3.0 °. 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 . R'0 0 3.0 3.0 3.0 B SITE POLE 1000W - LUMARK LANDAU REUSE EXISTING LIGHT FIXTURE o C.o b.o 3.o b.o b.o b.o b.o 3.0 3.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o 3.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o s0 \ b.o b.o o. b.o b.o b.0 b.0 b.0 b.o b.0 b.o b.o b.0 b.o b.o LIGHTING 22'-0" POLE METAL HALIDE MHLDFT1000180 `II I I I I I I I I I I I I` STANDARD ZII=OUN©ATION (DOUBLE HEADS) C SITE POLE 1000W - LUMARK LANDAU REUSE EXISTING LIGHT FIXTURE LIGHTING 22'-0" POLE METAL HALIDE MHLDFT1000 STANDARD 2'-0" FOUNDATION (FOUR HEADS) Ill S T I<IA=IA= MM? AC FLOOD LIGHT SURFACE 40OW - LUMARK LANDAU REUSE EXISTING LIGHT FIXTURE sheet number METAL HALIDE MHHR40OMH MAC FLOODLIGHT SURFACE 150W - LUMARK LANDAU REUSE EXISTING LIGHT FIXTURE , PHOTOMETRIC PLAN N ELECTRICAL SHEET INDEX METAL HALIDE MHHR15OMH KEYED NOTES: 000 E-1.00 SCALE: 1"=60'-0" E 1 .1 PHOTOMETRIC P LAN 01 ADD CUSTOM CUT OFF SHIELD. SECTION 10, T121N, R25W VICINITY MAP (NO SCALE) ZONING REQUIREMENTS ZONED B-3 - REGIONAL BUSINESS DISTRICT OVERLAY DISTRICT FBS - FREEWAY BONUS SIGN DISTRICT VEHICLE SALES h RENTAL IS A CONDITIONAL USE MINIMUM LOT AREA - NONE MINIMUM LOT WIDTH - 100 FEET MAXIMUM HEIGHT - 2 STORIES / 30 FEET BUILDING SETBACKS: FRONT - 30 FEET INTERIOR SIDE - 10 FEET REAR - 30 FEET PARKING SETBACKS: 6 FEET TO ANY LOT UNE PARKING REQUIREMENTS: 8 SPACES PLUS ONE ADDITIONAL SPACE FOR EACH 800 SO. FT. OF FLOOR AREA OVER 1,000 S0. FT. (VEHICLE SALES AND RENTAL) (AS PER CITY OF MONTICELLO ZONING CODE) LEGEND MHC MANHa E YN 8 WATER IA - U, o UGHT FO -E iH AT FERE HYDRANT 1NH0 —NONE MANN- EMNQ El£cTU[MANHIXE ourcAs METER noc AC ❑ AN —Dose ca a nEAx OUT o wu+p Ppsr I e —G POE b NOR GROUND UNES -UT- UNDER—ONE ONES -G- GAS NNN/SERNCE -w- wARR MAN,�RwDE M) =W= - RISES aF- Ij R) RPtA T OF A. ..IF. -FER 1910-111 ATm \� ROW O,RECTgTC .-a- BITUMINOUS SURFACING DENOTES CC ce- We—. RLS REGSTEAEG No SURVE- NOTES OURGS- W%S CS RECEIEO AnN A -£ICA MS SO ROBORc TOTAL STARON z Au ONENS,ONs — Bu1LONGs To PROPEsTr Ubes AREuEAsuRm PFRPEIIOIN-AR GR FAIR -Y TO SAID PROP- ONES. ]DE NPBRTo FFACE OF CURB. IIN-E55 a.... N01mEpOXN ARE uFASJREe FACE 1l T4EREEIs W SOUiBE IAP OPEROEt cE DE CEMETERIES OR BURIAL GROUNDS. OR SWI OAR RUNNING MROUGN wB�ECTT PROPSEin. R1NERs, OR wATERwAYs BOROERINO HEREGA! ARE AS PER ABOVE ND ACCESS ISSGINED m THE SUB.ECT Fe ERTYOUwAU CHELSEA ROAD AEU.. Is APUBUc _—Al R. VtNENCOFMMcEnDux, BDINGnAlVTMI�Q 9. THERE D CHANGE PRCPOa.NDAuEsaTI�,aoHER mMP E Ee OR FROM INE -TRO-G .uNISDICRON. ID IN IS No OSSERVADUE CADENCE OF RECENT STREET OR so— CONSTXE Crae OR _AIRS 9UMP ER SA Nai Y lNFILL i,- El-cE OF 91E USE As A souo wAslE GUVP. 1. NO .... OF POSE - � NDS MERE OSSER.HVEO ONS NE vECYlT FRtt AN. Or ANY —Ds 9.. GeLGCAoiED ON THE SUB.ECT PRROP�ITYEHr BEDROCK NOTES CORRESPONDING TO SCHEDULE B FIRSTAMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY COMMITMENT NO. NCS-806919C-PHX1 DATED AUGUST 30, 2016 14. RESERVAIpN OF SOE OF ALL OIL GAS A CONOIRIXIS SET FORDI IN ORDER /12-O 7 GRANRNG COMOIRONAL USE PERMIT. AS CONTANED IN IN--re[c�P YuenA,2]inawMENT NA-7- ,A71.11-1 DJOmTxINHAu ONIN— SET FORTN IN ORDER 012-1337ArsANNNG AR1ANcE. As CONTAINED 1x IxsmwENT AmEC15 SU_CT PROPERTY] RLANIET IN NATURE TT A—SI&ECT PROPERTY AND 15 PLOTTED AND SNORN HEREIN!. NO. Al2]2215. DE u.—. STATEMENT OF APPARENT ENCROACHMENTS ®BUILDING CORNER ENCROACHES INTO 30 -FOOT FRONT SETBACK 1.95 FEET. ®BITUMINOUS DRIVE ENCROACHES ONTO ADJACENT PROPERTY A MAXIMUM DISTANCE OF 1.7 FEET. ©MONUMENT SIGN ENCROACHES INTO PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT A MAXIMUM DISTANCE OF 8.5 FEET. r I>byWWfui FLOOD ZONE SUBJECT PROPERTY UES WITHIN FLOOD ZONE •X' (AREAS DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE 500 -YEAR FLOOD PLAIN) ACCORDING TO THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP COMMUNITY PANEL NUMBER 270534-0015 B, DATED AUGUST 4, 1988, MIGHT COUNTY. MINNESOTA PARKING SUMMARY 1 STANDARD SPACE 1 HANDICAP SPACE 2 TOTAL PARKING SPACES (STRIPED) NORTH SIDE OF 3887 CHELSEA ROAD WEST CITY OF MONTICELLO. WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA BASIS FOR BEARINGS WRIGHT COUNTY COORDINATE SYSTEM (NAD 83, 1996) (VIA REAL TIME GPS MEASUREMENTS UTIUZING MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION VRS NETWORK) LEGAL DESCRIPTION FIRSTAMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY COMMITMENT NO. NCS-806919C-PHXI DATED AUGUST 30, 2016 Lot I, Block 1, Maas Addition Wright County, Minnesota The property tl--led and shown hereon is the same property as described in First Ame-i- Title Insurance C-PanY comm t-1, number NCS 806919C-PHXI. doted August 30 2016 AREA SUMMARY LOT 1 = 259.313 SO. FT. OR 5.5930 ACRES SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE To- FRHP Lncalnshre, LLC, CWT, Inc, Freed -Roods, LLC; First American Title Insurance Company, The Matthews Company, Inc.: /N TEND This is to certify that this map or plot and the survey an which 1t is based were made n accordance AM the 2016 M'mmum Standard Detail Rege rements for � ON i1/1 RS rq TF completed an September 9. 2016. Date: Seotemher 16 201 IR �ITDEFENCE a y��yWq Mark D Kemper, Profess Ona do urveyor Minnesota Registration No. 1840/ Kemper h Associot.., Inc IAl♦JD GURVEYOR =_ 721 Old Highway 8 N.W. 18407New ..AIN1aE"�4�E5J Y No. Fox 651-631-5805kemper0Tro ns.nel oA� 4 icNEa„aREEi"RVn, STATE HWY ND. 94 REE 9 <,46 ERM. 4 '' "RRa �avj Yr R,3 3 (M 4c06 -6;""y) ' s a n,B CARO C-- 6 7'40. Ii FP \ �EMHOOF LOT I\ \ �z wENa R41ryA L °�iR°MIN....rlN wii"aFT OF iN�R N .-'OS` EE 114 \\\ RR"AG\ ^ II LO T 1, y i -NAN .IAyAOaInpH) \ E, Ab C v d 19: GN pla a I r Rj} :1l .. `.. -..' U] - W S.DtEET 2ND ADD1� ^ IR ) I li I �I( ' LGT1 BLflDK�690111 a� T o 6l B1 OC� �Jr. - : EAST'U E Gf NT� TI Oc1i 1 010 ii PID 1(155-225-001 I w iM o •'d or Lol t II 0 ® I da ( Ria - Si uxE. AGN .. Fq TW 0 I 53 i ooa+ 'UAl CHEESE S' �JBBG 5 o0.M DMM0��1�6AD �fFI b F4;r. w�HEAD OaGRS I .EQ1.:� t4 BEDROCK NOTES CORRESPONDING TO SCHEDULE B FIRSTAMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY COMMITMENT NO. NCS-806919C-PHX1 DATED AUGUST 30, 2016 14. RESERVAIpN OF SOE OF ALL OIL GAS A CONOIRIXIS SET FORDI IN ORDER /12-O 7 GRANRNG COMOIRONAL USE PERMIT. AS CONTANED IN IN--re[c�P YuenA,2]inawMENT NA-7- ,A71.11-1 DJOmTxINHAu ONIN— SET FORTN IN ORDER 012-1337ArsANNNG AR1ANcE. As CONTAINED 1x IxsmwENT AmEC15 SU_CT PROPERTY] RLANIET IN NATURE TT A—SI&ECT PROPERTY AND 15 PLOTTED AND SNORN HEREIN!. NO. Al2]2215. DE u.—. STATEMENT OF APPARENT ENCROACHMENTS ®BUILDING CORNER ENCROACHES INTO 30 -FOOT FRONT SETBACK 1.95 FEET. ®BITUMINOUS DRIVE ENCROACHES ONTO ADJACENT PROPERTY A MAXIMUM DISTANCE OF 1.7 FEET. ©MONUMENT SIGN ENCROACHES INTO PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT A MAXIMUM DISTANCE OF 8.5 FEET. r I>byWWfui FLOOD ZONE SUBJECT PROPERTY UES WITHIN FLOOD ZONE •X' (AREAS DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE 500 -YEAR FLOOD PLAIN) ACCORDING TO THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP COMMUNITY PANEL NUMBER 270534-0015 B, DATED AUGUST 4, 1988, MIGHT COUNTY. MINNESOTA PARKING SUMMARY 1 STANDARD SPACE 1 HANDICAP SPACE 2 TOTAL PARKING SPACES (STRIPED) NORTH SIDE OF 3887 CHELSEA ROAD WEST CITY OF MONTICELLO. WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA BASIS FOR BEARINGS WRIGHT COUNTY COORDINATE SYSTEM (NAD 83, 1996) (VIA REAL TIME GPS MEASUREMENTS UTIUZING MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION VRS NETWORK) LEGAL DESCRIPTION FIRSTAMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY COMMITMENT NO. NCS-806919C-PHXI DATED AUGUST 30, 2016 Lot I, Block 1, Maas Addition Wright County, Minnesota The property tl--led and shown hereon is the same property as described in First Ame-i- Title Insurance C-PanY comm t-1, number NCS 806919C-PHXI. doted August 30 2016 AREA SUMMARY LOT 1 = 259.313 SO. FT. OR 5.5930 ACRES SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE To- FRHP Lncalnshre, LLC, CWT, Inc, Freed -Roods, LLC; First American Title Insurance Company, The Matthews Company, Inc.: This is to certify that this map or plot and the survey an which 1t is based were made n accordance AM the 2016 M'mmum Standard Detail Rege rements for ALTA/NSPS Land Title Surveys, Ionlly established and and Includes Items 1, 2, 3 4, 6(a), 6(b), 7(a) 7(b)(1), adopted by ALTA and NSPS, 7(c), 8, 9, 10(0), 13 14, 16, 17 and 20 of Table A thereof The field work was completed an September 9. 2016. Date: Seotemher 16 201 Mark D Kemper, Profess Ona do urveyor Minnesota Registration No. 1840/ Kemper h Associot.., Inc IAl♦JD GURVEYOR =_ 721 Old Highway 8 N.W. 18407New Beighton, Minnesota 55112 Phone 651-631-0351 Fox 651-631-5805kemper0Tro ns.nel "ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY" PREPARED FOR: THE MATITHEW�PANYO 17220 Newhope Street, Suites 108-110, Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Tel: (714)-979-7181 Fox: (714)-641-2840 www.thematthewscompany cam CERTIFIED PARTES REVISION TJH MDK BY AP'V'D Camping World and Good Sam 3887 Chelsea Road W. Monticello, MN SCALE: 1-=40' CHKD./AP'V'D: DATE: September 13, 2016 APPROVED: DWN. BY: Tadd Ratan (18170A.DWG) CRIM. BY: Mark Kemper J.N.: 16-06-01-30002 - 10'-0" 90 3/4" 20'-0" 219" _ PYLON CABINET ELEVATIONS 11/4" = V-0" SQUARE FOOTAGE: Proposed = 10.0' x 20.0' = 200 Total SF f SCOPE OF WORK: 1. Manufacture new pylon cabinet as shown and described. 2. Manufacture new steel support structure as per engineering to support new pylon cabinet. 3. Dig new foundation as per engineering for new steel support structure. 4. Embed new steel structure in below grade concrete footer and allow recommended time for concrete to cure. 5. Install new pylon cabinet to steel support structure. 6. Connect to electrical primary provided by clients certified electrician. 7. Confirm proper illumination prior to departing site. DESCRIPTION: 1. Cabinet is double face extruded aluminum with retainer system. 2. Cabinet is internally illuminated with LED power strips. 3. Faces are flexible vinyl with digitally printed graphics. 4. Steel support structure will be as specified by engineering. 5. Steel structure will be embedded in below grade footer as per engineering. COLOR SCHEDULE: I White 3M Panagraphics III Vinyl Substrate Pantone 2945-C I As Per Art To Be Provided - Gloss Black Enamel Paint l0000000� GE LED Power Strips FULL VIEW 11/8" = V-0" 32'-0" THE SIGN OF PERFORMANCE 9 CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS 1077 West Blue Heron Blvd., Riviera Beach, FLA 33404 Phone: (561)863-6659/(800)772-7932 Fax: (561)863-4294 NORTHEAST DIVISION 707 Commerce Dr., Concord, INC 28025 Phone: (704)788-3733 / (800)772-7932 Fax: (704)788-3843 www.atlassignindustries.us This design / engineering is to remain Atlas Sign Industries exclusive property until approved and accepted thru purchase by client named on drawing. No part of design and or specifications may be duplicated without written authorization of Atlas Sign Industries. © Copyright 2017 S.O. No. 77166 Sheet No. 001 Date 0310212017 Path Camping World I MN I Monticello PM S. Hunt Drawn By D. Rodgers Scale As Shown Revision 1 04119117 By DR Revision 2 09119116 By DR Revision 3 010116 By AA Revision 4 010116 By AA Revision 5 010116 By AA Revision 6 010116 By AA Monticello, MN Approved by: Date Q APPROVED AS SHOWN Q APPROVED AS NOTED Q CORRECT & RESUBMIT UNDERWRITERS LABORATORIES INC. rrLISTED imp Approved by: Date Q APPROVED AS SHOWN Q APPROVED AS NOTED Q CORRECT & RESUBMIT v Cl) N L.L N � O U j 00 bo M Cl) cD M = T-11 3/8" Cut Size (VIF) _ = T-8"V.0.(VIF) _ PROPOSED FACE REPLACEMENTS 1314" = V-0" SCOPE OF WORK: Manufacture and install replacement faces in existing monument sign as shown. NOTE: Verify all dimensions in field prior to production. DESCRIPTION: 7328 LD white acrylic with exterior surface applied vinyl graphics. BEDRDEK EXISTING CONDITIONS I NTS SQUARE FOOTAGE: Proposed = 4.0'H x 8.01 = 32.0 SF COLOR SCHEDULE: 1 17328 White 6M..J 3M 3630-167 Bright Blue Vinyl PROPOSED COMPOSITE I NTS arias SIGN INDUSTRIES CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS 1077 West Blue Heron Blvd., Riviera Beach, FLA 33404 Phone: (561)863-6659/(800)772-7932 Fax: (561)863-4294 NORTHEAST DIVISION 707 Commerce Dr., Concord, NC 28025 Phone: (704)788-3733 / (800)772-7932 Fax: (704)788-3843 www.atlassignindustries.us This design / engineering is to remain Atlas Sign Industries exclusive property until approved and accepted thru purchase by client named on drawing. No part of design and or specifications may be duplicated without written authorization of Atlas Sign Industries. © Copyright 2017 S.O. No. 70860 Sheet No. 2 Date 31312017 Path Camping World I MN I Monticello PM S. Hunt Drawn By C. Barbato Scale As Shown Revision 1 09109116 By DR Revision 2 09119116 By DR Revision 3 010116 By AA Revision 4 010116 By AA Revision 5 010116 By AA Revision 6 010116 By AA Monticello, MN Approved by: Date Q APPROVED AS SHOWN Q APPROVED AS NOTED Q CORRECT & RESUBMIT UNDERWRITERS LABORATORIES INC. LISTED Approved by: Date Q APPROVED AS SHOWN Q APPROVED AS NOTED Q CORRECT & RESUBMIT � a� 'r� ' +,1 +J�fY V� F•� iit ii�•iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiil • iit iii riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiil iii.• •iii•iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiil ii...........liiiiiii•iiiiii INDUSTRIAL ORNAMENTAL ALUMINUM FENCE INSTITUTIONS I MUNICIPAL I PARKS & RECREATION I SCHOOLS ih r I �r � a� 'r� ' +,1 +J�fY V� F•� iit ii�•iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiil • iit iii riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiil iii.• •iii•iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiil ii...........liiiiiii•iiiiii INDUSTRIAL ORNAMENTAL ALUMINUM FENCE INSTITUTIONS I MUNICIPAL I PARKS & RECREATION I SCHOOLS Echelon II Classic style boasts traditional extended pickets with an arrow -shaped spear. These pointed pickets act as a visual warning to potential intruders. .� 4 -RAIL 3-RAIL ------------------------------------------------------------------------- .............................. .............................. 2 -RAIL > 4 -rail panels in 8; 9'& 10' heights > 3 -rail panels in 4', 5" 6'& 7' heights > 2 -rail panels in 4'. 5'& 6' heights Echelon II Invincible features outwardly curved pickets which serve as a warning to potential intruders. This fence style is the only industrial aluminum fence available that provides increased security with its unique "anti -climb" curved pickets. HIM 11111111 1 111(1(ifii�� 4 -rail panels in 8' 9'& 10' heights 3 -rail panels in 7' height 0 k BLACK BRONZE DESERT SAND WHITE This revolutionary fence system is comprised of aluminum posts, panels, & mounting brackets that are easily installed along any terrain. Echelon ll's superior strength and durability is a result of combining top quality design components with a maintenance -free, architectural grade finish. 1"x 1"x .062" / .125" wall* * Invincible only 1.75" x 1.75" x .070" 2.5" x 2.5" x .080" Echelon II Majestic has a contemporary feel that incorporates a flush top rail which produces a stately and streamlined appearance. This fence style highlights the landscape by blending with the surrounding architectural design. 4 -rail panels in 8, 9'& 10' heights 3 -rail panels in 4, 5, 6'& T heights 2 -rail panels in 4, 5'& 6' heights 4 -RAIL 3 -RAIL 2 -RAIL Echelon II Genesis has sleek lines of unaltered square pickets that are reminiscent of solid vertical bar wrought iron. The extended flat-topped tips can also be accented with decorative finials to enhance the fence design. 4 -rail panels in 8, 9'& 10' heights 3 -rail panels in 4, 5, 6'& T heights 2 -rail panels in 4, 5'& 6' heights 4 -RAIL 3 -RAIL 2 -RAIL O BALL CAP RING TRIAD QUAD FLAIR Profile of the architectural shape of the rail. Vertical design loads are per rail. (For capacity of fence panel, multiply by number of rails.) TEFF = EFFECTIVE WALL THICKNESS (IN) Sv = SECTION MODULUS (IN) VERTICAL SH = SECTION MODULUS (IN) HORIZONTAL VERTICAL LOAD DATA PVf = Ultimate Vertical HORIZONTAL LOAD DATA PHf = Ultimate Horizontal 6' SPAN MM 8' SPAN 6' SPAN 8' SPAN VERTICAL LOAD DATA* PV = Vertical Design load at .66° F HORIZONTAL LOAD DATA* PHd = Horizontal Design load at .66° F 6' SPAN 1.750" <-.070" 1.750" .070 .125 .260 243# 182# 505# 319# 145# 8'SPAN 109# 6'SPAN 303# i 8' SPAN 227# 1.625' .070" F.100" > 1.625' < .100/.070 .135 .260 262# 182# 499# 313# 145# 109# 299# 224# — GROMMET Aesthetic appearance while preventing moisture collection. — INTERNAL RETAINING ROD Variable pitch connection system provides ease of installation, high angle biasability and eliminates unsightly external fasteners. F��� J 0 — REINFORCED POST Center rib increases strength against wind loading and other horizontally applied forces. L PANEL BRACKET Universal Boulevard"" Bracket enables easy installation while allowing for adjustment of panel height and positioning. — FORERUNNERT" RAIL "U" Channel is a specifically formed, high strength architectural shape. INCREASED SECURITY The ForeRunner Rail with internal retaining rod prevents the attachment from being compromised. Fasteners are not exposed. AESTHETIC DETAILS "Good Neighbor Design" rod follows ForeRunner Centerline providing a clean and uninterrupted look void of visible screws or rivets. HIGH FUNCTIONALITY Biasability at a minimum of 25% that requires no additional assembly. SECURITY FASTENERS T— One way action secures the rail and prohibits removal by typical tools. vs 25%', j1T I �l - ---- - - III' III! li I lilli III�I ISI: �_J I I L ]J There are many advantages to choosing Echelon II° reinforced posts over standard punched posts made by typical aluminum fence manufacturers. E ECHELON II° POST Echelon II posts provide unparalleled strength due to a reinforced web profile design Echelon II requires a single post (non -punched) for all line, end, & corner posts (one post) Echelon II's wrap-around brackets are secured to the rail with a tamper proof fastener, ensuring the greatest level of security SUPERIOR FINISH <C> STANDARD PUNCHED POST Punched posts are weakened by removal of material from side-wall, yielding a vulnerable design Punched post designs require different posts for all line, end, & corner posts (multiple posts) Punched post systems require the rail be inserted into the post and secured using a single screw, providing no level of security Ameristar's production facilities use a state-of-the-art polyester powder coating system that provides a durable and scratch resistant finish while emitting no hazardous volatile organic compounds. The fence components can endure over 1,000 hours of salt spray testing; proving our claim of long-lasting durability. Our industrial aluminum guarantees a maintenance -free and environmentally friendly fence. PMM COATING LIMITED LIFETIME WARRANTY The Echelon family of aluminum fencing products are manufactured from superior quality materials by skilled craftsmen with the highest standards of workmanship in the industry. A six stage pre- treatment followed by an electrostatic spray of a "no -mar" TGIC polyester powder coat finish on all extruded framework provides protection against adverse environmental conditions. By using these proven techniques, Ameristar° is confident in offering Echelon with a limited lifetime warranty. I PEM i' Y' 1 �• 1� .0 --, wolw r" r�f FENCE RAIL FENCE ECHELON II® TYPICAL HEIGHT LENGTH POST SIZE WIND LOAD WIND LOAD FEET FEET INCHES SQUARED (SO.) CAPACITYFACTOR(PSF) CA PA CI TY FACTOR(MPH) GATE SYSTEMS Echelon II° gate options vary from swing gates for pedestrian or vehicle entry to sliding entry gates for high functioning points of entry. Each of these gate systems are individually constructed with the highest level of craftsmanship to provide project specific performance. r " �h Y t Il I } t , I!• �x�c�c�xa�ci � r ■ � �. � � ar', a � � � SLIDE I GATE 1 y SWING GATE Y r. iiaan, 11'111�■ .M__. ECHELON II" 1 Industrial Ornamental Aluminum Fence 7 KNOWLEDGE & EXPERIENCE Ameristar was chartered 30 years ago in response to the demand by consumers and specifiers for specialty fence products. Ameristar offers an aesthetically pleasing product that is both high in quality and affordability. This has been achieved by maximizing high-volume productivity, increasing product design strength, and promoting simplistic installation. PROVEN CAPABILITY Ameristar's integrated in-house process and extensive raw material inventory results in much improved productivity and availability compared to the competition. By having a vast finished goods inventory, Ameristar is capable of delivering finished products faster than competitors who sublet the majority of their operations. INDUSTRY LEADERSHIP Over the years Ameristar has continually raised the bar across the board in the manufacturing of high quality, innovative fencing products. Our demonstrated commitment to upholding higher values translates into superior products that go far beyond merely meeting minimum industry standards. Ameristar' world headquarters, manufacturing & coilprocessingfacilities in Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA. J Lrisi'1VL * Ameristar Headquarters • Sales & Service Centers #9725 I REVISED 0872014 0 8' O.C. Nomm� n } 116 1 II II II �j �j (ee FORERUNNER Rail I I I I See Cross- Section Below Varies with Post size varies with Height Height / (See ECHELONH rer Post -Sizing chart) Varies T with Standard Heights g VQ x.065 Wall Picket 4', 5', 6', T, 8', 9', 10' 36" Min. Footing depth 1%4' Bracket Options 2" Nom.J J 1 f f L 3%4' TYPICAL f f �,.. d NOTES: 1.) Post size depends on fence height and wind loads. See ECHELON -post sizing chart. � 2.) Panels also available for 6' on center post spacing 3.) Additional heights available on request. Some heights noted require a third and/or fourth rail. 4.) Third and Fourth rail optional. PANEL BRACKET Specially designed two -point connection ensures fixity of rail ends for increased strength. r, INTERNAL RETAINING ROD ` Variable pitch connection system for ease of installation, high angle bias ability and elimination of unsightly external fasteners. INDUSTRIAL STRENGTH AL UMINUM architectural shape. O® s s s s s REINFORCED POST Internal rib increases against wind loading as well as other horizontally applied forces (Only on 2%" aluminum posts), MONAL WRAP AROUND BRACKET � . o ao �� Values shown are nominal and not to be used for installation purposes. See product specification for installation requirements. 2ACISO Title: ECHELON II CLASSIC 2/3/4 -RAIL 1555 N. Mingo DR: NJB SH. lof 1 SCALE: DO NOT SCALE II AMERI S TAR I!;;;!I° 1 888 3033--3422 6 CK: BS Date 2-07-12 REV: f www.ameristarfence.com ' FORERUNNER -RAIL O � T INTERIOR GUIDE CHANNEL Base Material Channel forms lower limit of raceway for retaining "No -Mar" Polyester rod and allows for high Powder finish coat angle bias ability. FORERUNNER -RAIL "U" -Channel specially formed high strength INDUSTRIAL STRENGTH AL UMINUM architectural shape. O® s s s s s REINFORCED POST Internal rib increases against wind loading as well as other horizontally applied forces (Only on 2%" aluminum posts), MONAL WRAP AROUND BRACKET � . o ao �� Values shown are nominal and not to be used for installation purposes. See product specification for installation requirements. 2ACISO Title: ECHELON II CLASSIC 2/3/4 -RAIL 1555 N. Mingo DR: NJB SH. lof 1 SCALE: DO NOT SCALE II AMERI S TAR I!;;;!I° 1 888 3033--3422 6 CK: BS Date 2-07-12 REV: f www.ameristarfence.com STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS Project: Camping World Flag Pole & Footing 3801 Chelsea Rd Monticello, MN Project Number: 7166 Prepared For. Symonds Flags and Poles, Inc 7514 Pebble Drive, Building #30 Fort Worth, Texas 76118 Date: October 2016 Prepared By, Ryan Hazelwood, EIT Reviewed By., David A. Alter, PE, SE Ensign Engineering 45 West 10000 South, Suite 500 8 IONALEL415Q 1A 1� VJJ t Sandy, Utah 84070 troby cart4 that this plan, ,:,pe41t1cafM. or cert was prepared by me or under my direct P; (801) 265-0529 ervislon app that I �-,m a d 1 U",.i;sed fessional Enoincer under the laws of the F: (801) 255-4449 to of 1*01naesuta. DaWd 8. Atterit Name, nature: tem # 412D2 onsigneng.com Prq=i- campingwom P419 Pot & rmofta 7 166 By Rya* H&M&ood, Ell QwY.1krid By DAA E N S I G N Val.: Oh^Nmr 2016 F.ENERAL Mjkt;T INrORMAIIQ.N Plot,act Ci4mplf,11 World flaq Pole R. FoMing Prtmew Addtoiss 3601 Chols4a Rd monftolju, MS' Latitude: 46M Nwlb 1kipto-Imatol Lcoq1tudu; -103,011 WMm I (Appf(AlMaloj ElevaWn Will 11 (Amil Symonds Flags and Po4t. Inc RAW12LAVAWTION Summal cokvwswlp for 13V Pap Pok OFMON LOAD4. WAALL0111L Witt" Spe6d: 116 nvh - 3 tewntl Oust eApm.two. 0 C 0 Cm S Sofia Repsri: Dale. MA Rem" I POioq1'wuhlxq4w ju~ Aft -A41110 Beaking Prasxtfrtt fail . ..Pat' Ramlya pfeswre754 pito Adivit Piaswa:-- 45 PIA At R"t N"Awe: 60 P311 Comfjclent 01 F>rluljcfl. 11, 0.26 Ftu%sum Typw kxAlt@ Type: PAt FWIN $Aw 06FA to Fant: ii al AAAI M"Aft-VERADO-A CONCRETE & ROKORCING STER $PFCIFW.ATK)%S! Convelta q1mr,9111, I',: rowings F PowWalkin Wall. 3.0w psi L406 Ewilm. 4,00I pO S" oft aww_' _'y* PSI 6",.ingfShviw Waft 4.000 psi Wwnwd Reltiftwing Ram, ASTMA8160radefA) ASTM ArOO OmJo 60 Weldable Ft bar 14 to ba u."d wiles w6dz 410 ape-Oged on xx,*md dOfAleftMIS wetood INUO ralm': ASPA A185- Fit shunts, not foils 41�wauf IDrYju Muth. St1ft 500 t ".SA-JvAlta4a(14070 I (8619251;M19 I elsiWOMM11 Ensign Enginenring Project Tide Flag a " 45 West 1) South, Suito 5M Evigineer; Alex rJayvkin!,, 4rrojecl ID. Sanity, Utah 134070 Pidject baser: Flagpole Pf801 255,0529 General Section Property Calculator Pole Final Section P!VLOrdts Twat Area 55-403 1PA2 Cat ted final CA tlititanai from Datum: X Cg Dist. 0.0 M Y eg Dist U In Idge Distances firum CG. Sxx +X 9.010 -X 40 ill 01 0.0 it, -Y .9.0 in jyy Sxx, -'Y SXx +y Syy - X Byy, +X f XX f yy Genwal Sk" C*C. 1 Area - 20,164 in&, 11380.16 in14 1,380.1611 4 153.352 V3 153,352 W3 151352 iM3 M-352 W3 4.1347 In 4.%7 In Rodd = 9,17 D In Thickness 0.375 in RMIW 0 ekes CCW Xcg n O.Ow In IXx 806.6311n'14 Sxx 69.626 le3 R)v r 6,233in YcQ m OM In In = 8006.63110M Syy 89.626 irM Ryy - 6,233in 7. M -G in T Ickn- 0.375 in CM Asea 16,062 fn12 Xcq = 0.000 In IxX U 372.160 ina4 SXX = 53.251 le3 Rxx 4,819M yq . 17 (,,,1 1!, l') Ail �iqpo e DetLi E N S I G N lot. OAMBAlto IN kmaw"MINO h:- 130 fe: V o I o 14 t.- i else 'f C > 1. 10, deq4 1.10 1-5e C d4" 0.82 C deq4 17i1,32 vt 4 -5-0 -Of- t, 2 pq;.0.00256-V , cl, d4' C 11q, G- 24. 8 A 4:. 11 ' "' ' I I . 0 4 ft 2 m bll- A I , p 4 Psf, z 4. 32. 9 kip I't Height Coetticent FG1001 Eq. 2 Wind Pressure ipsf) F111001 Kq, I Area of L"Ole Moment at Base resukting fr(,m, secjment 4 - w it: taut wirit:.lf; w 3 in W,,!. G. 62 5 1-4 30 tr h 40 fv Pote Helghts h 4 0 h 20 ft 4 Wind Loads op Pole (Per NAAMM ET1001-07) 6*- 115 Wind WOocil;y ASCE 7-11) 1m b) Ad)kjnmed to ASCE. 7-05 Gntr Effect Factor Recommended for Plaq pnlef� C31ctjjatjons for h --- 12D SC: gmesit 4 z 4:' ft Ave lieiqbt above Ground ift) d O 552 4 129 deq�' 'A C.3 if Cdvq4 <0.45 0. 82 Cd4' Drag Coefficient FP1001 Table 3.2,4 else 'f C > 1. 10, deq4 1.10 1-5e C d4" 0.82 C deq4 17i1,32 vt 4 -5-0 -Of- t, 2 pq;.0.00256-V , cl, d4' C 11q, G- 24. 8 A 4:. 11 ' "' ' I I . 0 4 ft 2 m bll- A I , p 4 Psf, z 4. 32. 9 kip I't Height Coetticent FG1001 Eq. 2 Wind Pressure ipsf) F111001 Kq, I Area of L"Ole Moment at Base resukting fr(,m, secjment 4 - Cal cuiations tot 1) 90 90 0. AVO Height above Ground (ft) w " 2 ?t 129 deq!" 3 0.4345 C d3 it C do q.-5 cO.45 Drag Cuefficion! PPIOD! M:u 3.2.4 V. 1.45 a r= if C dea !.10 else d3, 0.45 C OeQ hy, Gt goo Ft iqhFG1 H.et Coefficient 001 Eq, 2 ILL-] Py V OOMOV " C M -C 113 -G. IA. 899"1 Wind Prensure (pxf) PPIDO! 1q. I A 3 :w h 3' w 3 - 35,8333 ft 2 Area of Pole Mby-Aylysf a..3 -#i . 601 kip ft. MOMOM at base resulting from segment 3. Cal cid.ations for h — 50 Seqt1 ,nt-2 z>4$0 ft: AV* Height above Ground (ft) w 2_ 2 G w- 1,1661 f 129 C deq2:, V. 1 0. 3082 c di. it C deq2 <0.45 Draq Coefficient FF1001 Table 3.2.4 2) 0-45 else if C deQ > 1.10 I M) C. -OAS C deq2 112 00 Ft Reight Coefficient FGIOO1 Eq. 2 9 i Wind Pressure fp6f) PPION Eq. I A 2:. It "2' 4C), fi(�67 tt 2 Area of PoJe - 2 M 132:. A 2' P 2 P"3 t - V. 2. ?6,,1,)9t?6 kip ft: Moment at Base re5ultinq from ueqment 2. I Ur G ',is A 4 tJ—o- 'lift, Calculations for Ii T-, 15 Seqment I z 15 :t Ave lieiqliC above Ground (ft) !29 0, M,'3 Or 09 Cue f f -i C i en' , PPI 00 1 Table 3.2. 1 deq V- d 1.3 Jeql 0. x 5 else i f C d eq I> 1.:10 1.10 e I. se, C dl- 0.45 C deql clt fleigbt Coefficient FGIODI Eq. 2 dI -C It I -G-8.962 Wind Pressure (115t) FP1,001 Eq, I A h W' - Ott 2 Area of Pole Mb3:w A I' f'1. pSf-z1m6.0493kIp ft Moment at Base resulting from Segment 1. m 11110 1 e�-, m b4 41 m b3 + M b2 + 14 b1- 107. 143 k ip Ft Wind Loads on Flaq_Appr NAAMM / FP3,001-07) H t, W .-60ft z f-11"ift Flag Geometry - 9.5 hf HO!iqht, C(mffieierit 1G1001 Eq. 2 goo ft A H 'w -1800ft Area of Flag ids,; -0.00141 - f 4A 'Clif. '(S-700.3AII-11bil Foxce on Flag FG1001 Eq. 5 f Polye,lter Flag - Worst Case 1141', Ei. w 17, z f M537kip ft Momemt aL Basc M M + m 0"1 kA p t. r btot�eil bf MOMeDt. at. B�18e of Segment 2 11121MA -P pvf- h )+A 7 -h P lis -h Z It 1)- 1?2.5-124 k Ip ft - 4 4 7 ( 4" 1 3 1,' 3' 14 A) 2Fist( 2 1+lI) d I : I Enwgn Ervjin"tring ProWATillf): 0.000 Flagpole 0.13 45 West 10WO Swlh, Suite 500 Envinw. 02 Ryan flazetwood project to-. Sandy, Utah 84070 f1rd^,A Desm 0.0010 FlaWoie 0.0 P:1801] 2WA0529 E N S I G Nwwansiot*N.Com 1.000 +13*S4H 0.000 ME 0.13 ok 0.0 Pole Foofino rambedded in $oil #1i*0.7mj40.7S0L+H om 0.000 0.13 00 0,0 1,000 +D#0.7W40.760S+1,f OMO OMD (3osuiplion 0.0 0.0 1.000 Code Relitrances 2,346 167MI1 11-36 Calculations Fmr 941A ISO +D+9J0E4H Land Combinations I.Jacd ASCE 7-10 0.100 0.13 0.0 Generali Infom,01on 1,000 i DiVALr#0.150L4Il.45GW4H 1,700 140.615 10.25 851.0 8525 54.0 in Crilcufate Min, Depil't for Mmalhe Pressures Nv Lateral Restraint at ground Sud am Aftow Pasaivo.................. 2,50.6 PcI MHX Paulve 1.500.0 PSI Controlling Values GamOng Lod CoWnalkxi; *Dt0.60W+Tf Lateral LoW 2.346 k mowint IR7.50 k�h NO GroqfwJ Surface Restraint pt'nsumf at 103 00pb Moat 90.01 Pit AXtanatrlo 941.37 PSI W , roofing Base Area 15.104 M12 maximum &it Prossuro f16 Irst r7Vrtrtre*Aid" Applfedl oOs Lxlvm)Cooc#ft**d Lod tk) Laiwal distributed Load* jk") VorlicA Load (k) D:Wad Load k I'M k Li:W)oftlye k km k L: On kffl k S:SA0,w k RM k WWind 1.107 k fifj2t1Q kM k E, Eadhiclqaka k kA1 k H , LaIml ERM k W0&[anceabw TOP of Load abom ground aurfam ground Surfam 115.0 ft 430.0 BOTTOM of Load abm* ground muif"e +1}*L+H 0.000 0.01,0 0.13 00 02 1.000 'Otu0i 0.000 0.0010 0.113 0.0 0.0 1.000 +13*S4H 0.000 0,000 0.13 ok 0.0 1.000 #1i*0.7mj40.7S0L+H om 0.000 0.13 00 0,0 1,000 +D#0.7W40.760S+1,f OMO OMD 0.13 0.0 0.0 1.000 4D+0,60W+1j 2,346 167MI1 11-36 940.8 941A ISO +D+9J0E4H 0.011 0.100 0.13 0.0 00 1,000 i DiVALr#0.150L4Il.45GW4H 1,700 140.615 10.25 851.0 8525 1.000 Eat Er4wenna Flagpole 46 WODI MW sou1h"9I.Re'" Sundy, Wh $4070 Engineer: P: 18011255-0529 N S I G NwwewO"8%Co,,u E T"t STAMDAOO IN (1,141HE"I"a flagpole Pole Footing Embedded In Soil 11 ]1� UR Onsu"Ptim'. #O+0.75Ul,+0,?50S404M+H . 1766 +D*0.750L*0.75GS40-525OE*H 0.000 +0,60D#0.60W40,60H 2.146 0,000 POW Title Flagpole Engineer: Ryan HualwoIxf plulact 10: Project Dow flagpole 140.625 t 0:25 851.it 8525 OMO 0,13 0.0 0.0 LOOO 187.500 1138 940.8 041 A IM 0000 0.13 0.0 0.0 I.ODO Moment, at Base of Seciment, m3:. A P Pst, z h h?)+A P- - ix *W h, - 14�,)-54.46(),i kip f: 4 4• 4- C 3' k 3 '1 V, t at Bas ,, Of S'eqMent A h n -1) + w f .1 is 4 9 k i 14 4:� A 4" Modulo"; of Eacli Se�qment (From Erieyva1c.) 3 81:=€39.626 fit -3 S Bending Stress -25.1204 k-11 1 1.27. -. 6214 k5j Lj42 Fm -, M . -I- 21,3335 kvi 1 18. 1!3 4448 k8i 1 -- strength perl tep C, i% ke.�l for 36 ksi i -;I At maximom wind, the pole with attacbed flag would not fail. However, tile flag is not expected to atay w.inds exceeding !rO MPH. CdIc-ulations without the flag follow. The assumption is that the: flag wil I rip from the pole before i t is able to transfer maximum load to the poop. FLAG SHAILL BE, RE,14M.0 BEFORE WIND SPKT,,.US MACH 75 MPH. Moment at Base witliout Flaq Pi btatalwo i-k%pol6- 107.143 kip ft Moment at l3•ase of Set 4truent. 2 withot-j� JPjS Ig M w. A 4, 14 PS x 1-h +A3- P 3 ps f 111) + A2P2( psf, z2 - h I)- 63.04!)l kiP f7 2 1 1) ' Moment at Base of secjmerit 3 wittwut m _3wo r- A 4, 2 h tl;�,)+A p P�:f- V. 2?. ')bj 0 k ip tt '4f""j 4- 1 - 3' 3 1 3 Moment at. Base of Seciment. 4 w:j,tjiaut 1--j M 4 €f' -A4' P 4 psf(r4- h I - it 2- h3)-2.7414kjP ft Benclinq 8,trcss WIT11OUT rLAG btotalwof 14. 3 C' '4 k,]-iF3-t�r�fI C, 2.071 ksi t)o k:, i 3.0192 ksi 4 Lf I I rW I I 11-1 i i i q 13 U � c n S I i �, i I I I - I o t E x c c e d 32 k s i innuts for Eat, rcalr- Polo fool:,inq Awn '' kip 0. 9214 77-- W; . i . "1!!,r Back Calculated Equivalenr Prensure f0v Energ Adjusted ;a ARM 1-10 F!aq wind Load increased t-,) ASCE 7-10 Loading FOUNDATION SLEEVE W/ TAMPED SAND pq 4W FRO TINGOMETER FOOTING WARNING: FLAG MUST BE REMOVED IF WINDS WILL EXCEED 75 MPH 3V x 6V FLAG MAX. 6 518" Dik X 318" THICK X -0' TALL SECTION 10 314" DIA. X 318" THICK X -40' TALI SECTION 14* 01k X 3/8* THICK X -46' TALL SECTION 18" IIIA. X 318" THICK X -40' TALI. SECTION or WOft VMS til tlp'-ArOd by Me of under my dirt 8i# IVt#F31i 1h6t I 8M a duly Ucet',Sed -under the laws of the State, of Iviln"e"Ma. print Na�m: DavId 8. After - ! .,(1_ -- ELEVATION Signature:..,. ignaturc6 (71- Date /'p// ucense cI -� FLAGPOLE S K SCALE: N.T-S. CAMPING WORLD 'Ak 3801 Chelsea Road Monticello„ MN 55362 E N S I G N STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN Camping World East Parking Lot Expansion Monticello, Minnesota March 6, 2017 Revised July 18, 2017 �Hakanson Anderson 3601 Thurston Avenue Anoka, Minnesota 55303 (763) 427-5860 I hereby certify that this Plan, Specification or Report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 43362 Timothy A. Eggerichs, PE Lic. No. Date S:\PRIVATE\3300\3395\3395.05\339505SMP.docx TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY OF RESULTS FIGURES TABLE OF CONTENTS Figure 1 — Drainage Areas, Existing Conditions Figure 2 — Drainage Areas, Proposed Conditions PAGE APPENDIX 1 DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS — EXISTING CONDITIONS Schematic............................................................................1 Summary of Output (2-Year)................................................2-3 Summary of Output (10-Year)..............................................4-5 Summary of Output (100-Year)............................................6-7 APPENDIX 2 DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS — PROPOSED CONDITIONS Schematic............................................................................1 Summary of Output (2 -Year) ................................................ 2-8 Summary of Output (10-Year)..............................................9-15 Summary of Output (100-Year)............................................16-22 APPENDIX 3 DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS — REGIONAL POND Schematic............................................................................1 Summary of Output (2 -Year) ................................................ 2-3 Summary of Output (10-Year)..............................................4-5 Summary of Output (100 -Year) ............................................ 6-7 APPENDIX 4 INFILTRATION CALCULATIONS APPENDIX 5 ATLAS 14 RAINFALL TABLE S:\PRIVATEk3300\3395\3395.05\339505SMP.docx SUMMARY OF RESULTS MWMA-M", The proposed Camping World facility will be completing a bituminous parking lot expansion. The proposed project will include removals, site grading, stormwater improvements and parking lot construction. This site is located between 3801 and 3936 Chelsea Road West in Monticello, Minnesota. The City of Monticello and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) dictate the stormwater requirements for this site. The stormwater facilities are based on their guidelines. STORMWATER REQUIREMENT Stormwater facilities will be constructed on site to meet the requirements of the MPCA and the City of Monticello. HydroCAD was used to model existing and proposed conditions. Existing Conditions The existing site consists of an open field adjacent to an existing parking lot. This site drains overland to an existing storm sewer system in the adjacent parking lot to the west. The storm sewer from the parking lot to the west drains to a regional stormwater pond that provides rate control and water quality for the two sites. Volume control is required for the Camping World site. The volume control requirements will be met with the proposed Stormtech underground infiltration system in the northern portion of the site. Proposed Conditions As mentioned, the proposed conditions will include a parking lot expansion and stormwater improvements. The parking lot will drain to a proposed Stormtech underground infiltration system and then outlet to the existing storm sewer system in Chelsea Road. The following table summarizes the discharge rates for existing and proposed conditions. The 2-, 10- and 100 -year storm events were analyzed. The HydroCAD summaries for existing and proposed conditions are included in Appendices 1 and 2. The Atlas 14 Rainfall Table is included in Appendix 5. Existing Proposed Storm Discharge Discharge Event (cfs) (cfs) 2 -Year 1.46 2.14 10 -Year 3.40 6.29 100 -Year 10.41 12.62 The HydroCAD summaries for existing and proposed conditions are included in Appendices 1 and 2. The Atlas 14 Rainfall Table is included in Appendix 5. REGIONAL POND The downstream regional ponds are designed to manage the rate control requirements for the Camping World site. The regional ponds are designed for the runoff from the site assuming a curve number of 87. The proposed site has a composite curve number of 94. To meet the discharge requirements for the site, a Stormtech underground infiltration system is proposed. By storing water in the Stormtech underground infiltration system, the discharge from the site will be significantly reduced. The following table summarizes the proposed discharge rates, which includes onsite storage, and the discharge rates assuming a curve number of 87 without onsite storage. Discharge Assuming a Curve Number of 87 Proposed Discharge with a Curve Number of 94 with Onsite Storage (cfs) 2.14 6.29 12.62 As shown, the proposed discharge will be significantly less than the discharge that was planned to the regional ponds from the Camping World site. The HydroCAD summary for the discharge rates assuming a curve number of 87 are included in Appendix 3 and the proposed conditions HydroCAD summaries are included in Appendix 2. VOLUME CONTROL The onsite soils are conducive to infiltration. An infiltration rate of 1.60 inches per hour has been assumed. The City of Monticello requires that a 1.1 -inch volume over the new impervious surface be infiltrated on site. The new impervious area is 103,381 square feet, which equates to a required volume of 9,477 cubic feet. An infiltration volume of 9,554 cubic feet is provided. This volume infiltrates in 7 hours. The infiltration calculations are included in Appendix 4. 2 Without Onsite Storm Storage Event (cfs) 2 -Year 10.67 10 -Year 18.64 100 -Year 34.06 Proposed Discharge with a Curve Number of 94 with Onsite Storage (cfs) 2.14 6.29 12.62 As shown, the proposed discharge will be significantly less than the discharge that was planned to the regional ponds from the Camping World site. The HydroCAD summary for the discharge rates assuming a curve number of 87 are included in Appendix 3 and the proposed conditions HydroCAD summaries are included in Appendix 2. VOLUME CONTROL The onsite soils are conducive to infiltration. An infiltration rate of 1.60 inches per hour has been assumed. The City of Monticello requires that a 1.1 -inch volume over the new impervious surface be infiltrated on site. The new impervious area is 103,381 square feet, which equates to a required volume of 9,477 cubic feet. An infiltration volume of 9,554 cubic feet is provided. This volume infiltrates in 7 hours. The infiltration calculations are included in Appendix 4. 2 FIGURES Figure 1 - Drainage Areas Existing Conditions Figure 2 - Drainage Areas Proposed Conditions INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 94 kUn s a dp,Q aM rs0\\ t* \near3�3 �a pnoko' 3,42 Cjhurs{on 5g6p Fp o„dn'Co� ers° 1g3WWW�hokonSOn, \- jpNMENS NWOB R 0 S�gCA gpU�O PRY pRP\NAGg DRA\NAGE PRRpW A w0ED PNsl pN \ g0 4” 0 EE 40 \N ,sc E �RE 1 Rx\DRA NAGE Nos \1 1 I 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 94 \-E/ SVgG pjCNMENS N,301BER P O pRY ORp\NAGE BGUN� / DRp\NAGE pRRGW Aw0 EXP NS ON PARK\N0 \'0 DRA\NPG C��� j ONS PROPOSED -- y"6------------------- ---- -- �----------- ' —°"—�—« ----- --- -9-------------- / J------- --------------------95]------- --- - _�\5> .------95fi_--- --- — — — — — — \ 1 1 956 1 1 \ 1 I 1 \ •Dss � � 1 \ 1 \ 1 \ (\\ \ I 1 g56 � \ \ — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — -- — — 1 \ /l9 / / 5,0 5tonn RE -95 . \ ' \ IE(NW)-94517 IE(SE)=945.02 E ZW'/E)=914.18 / IE (5)=950.88 tE / J / IE (W/E)=942.]3 / /CB D4 / RE=95525 _ CHELSEA ROAD —7— 918 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — -- — — " 3�3 aMs akanasood rs ,42 3oom pp° C� s{oned56 -5601jhnrgp ,efson' �63WWW,hokonson' \-E/ SVgG pjCNMENS N,301BER P O pRY ORp\NAGE BGUN� / DRp\NAGE pRRGW Aw0 EXP NS ON PARK\N0 \'0 DRA\NPG C��� j ONS PROPOSED APPENDIX 1 Drainage Calculations — Existing Conditions (2-1 10- and 100 -Year Storm Events) ( E2El> Subcat Reach Pon Link Routing Diagram for 339505Existing Conditions (7-18-17) Prepared by Hakanson Anderson HydroCAD®10.00-20 s/n 01341 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 339505Existing Conditions (7-18-17) MSE24-hr3 2-YearRainfall=2.84" Prepared by Hakanson Anderson HvdroCAD®10.00-20 s/n 01341 © 2017 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pana ? Time span=5.00-20.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs, 301 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Subcatchment E1: Runoff Area--58,238 sf 32.14% Impervious Runoff Depth>0.71" Tc=10.0 min CN=73 Runoff=1.46 cfs 0.080 of Subcatchment E2: Runoff Area=133,066 sf 35.99% Impervious Runoff Depth>0.76" Tc=10.0 min CN=74 Runoff=3.58 cfs 0.194 of Pond LOW: Peak Elev=955.30' Storage=5,014 cf Inflow=3.58 cfs 0.194 of Discarded=0.21 cfs 0.125 of Primary=0.00 cfs 0.000 of Oufflow=0.21 cfs 0.125 of Total Runoff Area = 4.392 ac Runoff Volume = 0.273 of Average Runoff Depth = 0.75" 65.18% Pervious = 2.863 ac 34.82% Impervious = 1.529 ac 339505Existing Conditions (7-18-17) Prepared by Hakanson Anderson HvdroCADO 10.00-20 s/n 01341 © 2017 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment E1: Runoff = 1.46 cfs @ 12.19 hrs, Volume= 0.080 af, Depth> 0.71" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.84" Area (sf) CN Description 18,718 98 Paved parking, HSG B 39,520 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 58,238 73 Weighted Average 39,520 67.86% Pervious Area 18,718 32.14% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment E2: Runoff = 3.58 cfs @ 12.19 hrs, Volume= 0.194 af, Depth> 0.76" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.84" Area (sf) CN Description 47,889 98 Paved parking, HSG B 85,177 61 >75% Grass cover, Good. HSG B 133,066 74 Weighted Average 85,177 6,468 64.01 % Pervious Area 47,889 52,885 35.99% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Pond LOW: Inflow Area = 3.055 ac, 35.99% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 0.76" for 2 -Year event Inflow = 3.58 cfs @ 12.19 hrs, Volume= 0.194 of Outflow = 0.21 cfs @ 13.69 hrs, Volume= 0.125 af, Atten= 94%, Lag= 90.0 min Discarded = 0.21 cfs @ 13.69 hrs, Volume= 0.125 of Primary = 0.00 cfs @ 5.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 955.30' @ 13.69 hrs Surf.Area= 20,354 sf Storage= 5,014 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 214.7 min calculated for 0.125 of (64% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 146.5 min ( 955.7 - 809.2 ) MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.84" Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storaqe Description #1 954.69' 102,047 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq -ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 954.69 0 0 0 955.00 6,468 1,003 1,003 956.00 52,885 29,677 30,679 957.00 89,851 71,368 102,047 Device Routinq Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 955.70' 20.0' long x 5.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 Coef. (English) 2.34 2.50 2.70 2.68 2.68 2.66 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.67 2.66 2.68 2.70 2.74 2.79 2.88 #2 Discarded 954.69' 0.450 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area Discarded OutFlow Max=0.21 cfs @ 13.69 hrs HW=955.30' (Free Discharge) t2=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.21 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max --0.00 cfs @ 5.00 hrs HW=954.69' (Free Discharge) t1=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Pana 3 339505Existing Conditions (7-18-17) MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.22" Prepared by Hakanson Anderson HvdroCADO 10.00-20 s/n 01341 © 2017 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pane 4 Time span=5.00-20.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs, 301 points Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Subcatchment E1: Runoff Area=58,238 sf 32.14% Impervious Runoff Depth>1.60" Tc=10.0 min CN=73 Runoff=3.40 cfs 0.179 of Subcatchment E2: Runoff Area=1 33,066 sf 35.99% Impervious Runoff Depth>1.67" Tc=10.0 min CN=74 Runoff=8.13 cfs 0.426 of Pond LOW: Peak Elev=955.57' Storage=12,308 cf Inflow=8.13 cfs 0.426 of Discarded=0.34 cis 0.215 of Primary=0.00 cis 0.000 of Outflow=0.34 cis 0.215 of Total Runoff Area = 4.392 ac Runoff Volume = 0.604 of Average Runoff Depth = 1.65" 65.18% Pervious = 2.863 ac 34.82% Impervious =1.529 ac 339505Existing Conditions (7-18-17) Prepared by Hakanson Anderson HvdroCAD®10.00-20 s/n 01341 © 2017 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.22" Summary for Subcatchment E1: Runoff = 3.40 cfs @ 12.18 hrs, Volume= 0.179 af, Depth> 1.60" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.22" Area (sf) CN Description 18,718 98 Paved parking, HSG B 39,520 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 58,238 73 Weighted Average 39,520 67.86% Pervious Area 18,718 32.14% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment E2: Runoff = 8.13 cfs @ 12.18 hrs, Volume= 0.426 af, Depth> 1.67" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.22" Area (sf) CN Description 47,889 98 Paved parking, HSG B 85,177 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 133,066 74 Weighted Average 85,177 64.01 % Pervious Area 47,889 35.99% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Pond LOW: Inflow Area = 3.055 ac, 35.99% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 1.67" for 10 -Year event Inflow = 8.13 cfs @ 12.18 hrs, Volume= 0.426 of Outflow = 0.34 cfs @ 13.94 hrs, Volume= 0.215 af, Atten= 96%, Lag= 105.4 min Discarded = 0.34 cfs @ 13.94 hrs, Volume= 0.215 of Primary = 0.00 cfs @ 5.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 955.57' @ 13.94 hrs Surf.Area= 33,036 sf Storage= 12,308 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 229.7 min calculated for 0.215 of (51% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 161.7 min ( 957.3 - 795.6 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storaqe Description #1 954.69' 102,047 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq -ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 954.69 0 0 0 955.00 6,468 1,003 1,003 956.00 52,885 29,677 30,679 957.00 89,851 71,368 102,047 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 955.70' 20.0' long x 5.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 Coef. (English) 2.34 2.50 2.70 2.68 2.68 2.66 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.67 2.66 2.68 2.70 2.74 2.79 2.88 #2 Discarded 954.69' 0.450 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area Discarded OutFlow Max=0.34 cfs @ 13.94 hrs HW=955.57' (Free Discharge) t-2=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.34 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 5.00 hrs HW=954.69' (Free Discharge) t-1=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Pane 5 339505Existing Conditions (7-18-17) MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.87" Prepared by Hakanson Anderson HvdroCADO 10.00-20 s/n 01341 © 2017 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paae 6 Time span=5.00-20.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs, 301 points Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Subcatchment E1: Runoff Area=56,238 sf 32.14% Impervious Runoff Depth>3.66" Tc=10.0 min CN=73 Runoff=7.74 cfs 0.408 of Subcatchment E2: Runoff Area=133,066 sf 35.99% Impervious Runoff Depth>3.77" Tc=10.0 min CN=74 Runoff=18.15 cfs 0.959 of Pond LOW: Peak Elev=955.85' Storage=23,174 cf Inflow=18.15 cfs 0.959 of Discarded=0.48 cfs 0.289 of Primary=2.67 cfs 0.316 of Outflow=3.14 cfs 0.605 of Total Runoff Area= 4.392 ac Runoff Volume= 1.367 of Average Runoff Depth= 3.73" 65.18% Pervious = 2.863 ac 34.82% Impervious = 1.529 ac 339505Existing Conditions (7-18-17) MSE24-hr3 100-YearRainfall=6.87" Prepared by Hakanson Anderson HvdroCADO 10.00-20 s/n 01341 © 2017 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pana 7 Summary for Subcatchment E1: Runoff = 7.74 cfs @ 12.18 hrs, Volume= 0.408 af, Depth> 3.66" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.87" Area (sf) CN Description 18,718 98 Paved parking, HSG B 39,520 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 58,238 73 Weighted Average 39,520 67.86% Pervious Area 18,718 32.14% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment E2: Runoff = 18.15 cfs @ 12.18 hrs, Volume= 0.959 af, Depth> 3.77" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.87" Area (sf) CN Description 47,889 98 Paved parking, HSG B 85,177 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 133,066 74 Weighted Average 85,177 64.01 % Pervious Area 47,889 35.99% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Pond LOW: Inflow Area = 3.055 ac, 35.99% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 3.77" for 100 -Year event Inflow = 18.15 cfs @ 12.18 hrs, Volume= 0.959 of Outflow = 3.14 cfs @ 12.61 hrs, Volume= 0.605 af, Atten= 83%, Lag= 26.0 min Discarded = 0.48 cfs @ 12.61 hrs, Volume= 0.289 of Primary = 2.67 cfs @ 12.61 hrs, Volume= 0.316 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 955.85' @ 12.61 hrs Surf.Area= 45,827 sf Storage= 23,174 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 144.4 min calculated for 0.603 of (63% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 87.4 min ( 869.8 - 782.4 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description. #1 954.69' 102,047 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (scl-ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 954.69 0 0 0 955.00 6,468 1,003 1,003 956.00 52,885 29,677 30,679 957.00 89,851 71,368 102,047 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 955.70' 20.0' long x 5.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 Coef. (English) 2.34 2.50 2.70 2.68 2.68 2.66 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.67 2.66 2.68 2.70 2.74 2.79 2.88 #2 Discarded 954.69' 0.450 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area Discarded OutFlow Max=0.48 cfs @ 12.61 hrs HW=955.85' (Free Discharge) t2=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.48 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=2.66 cfs @ 12.61 hrs HW=955.85' (Free Discharge) L1=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir (Weir Controls 2.66 cfs @ 0.90 fps) 0 a U;I 101 Drainage Calculations — Proposed Conditions (2-, 10- and 100 -Year Storm Events) P1 P2 /ITORMTICH Subcat Reach Pon Link S Routing Diagram for 339505Proposed Conditions (7-18-17) Prepared by Hakanson Anderson HydroCADO 10.00-20 s/n 01341 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 3395051Proposed Conditions (7-18-17) MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.84" Prepared by Hakanson Anderson HvdroCAD®10.00-20 s/n 01341 © 2017 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paae 2 Time span=0.00-60.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs, 1201 points Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv. Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Subcatchment P1: Runoff Area=64,558 sf 86.02% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.29" Tc=10.0 min CN=61/98 Runoff=4.51 cfs 0.282 of Subcatchment P2: Runoff Area=1 22,656 sf 90.51% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.39" Tc=10.0 min CN=61/98 Runoff=8.99 cfs 0.561 of Subcatchment P3: Runoff Area=4,090 sf 84.21% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.25" Tc=7.0 min CN=61/98 Runoff=0.32 cfs 0.018 of Pond STORMTECH: Peak Elev=950.93' Storage=17,218 cf Inflow=13.50 cfs 0.843 of Discarded=0.52 cfs 0.633 of Primary=1.82 cfs 0.210 of Outflow=2.34 cfs 0.843 of Total Runoff Area = 4.392 ac Runoff Volume = 0.861 of Average Runoff Depth = 2.35" 11.141% Pervious = 0.489 ac 88.86% Impervious = 3.902 ac 339505Proposed Conditions (7-18-17) Prepared by Hakanson Anderson HvdroCADO 10.00-20 s/n 01341 © 2017 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment P1: Runoff = 4.51 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 0.282 af, Depth= 2.29" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/imperv., Time Span= 0.00-60.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.84" Area (sf) CN Description 36,814 98 Proposed Impervious 18,718 98 Existing Impervious 9,026 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 64,558 93 Weighted Average 9,026 61 13.98% Pervious Area 55,532 98 86.02% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.84" Pane 3 3395051Proposed Conditions (7-18-17) Prepared by Hakanson Anderson HvdroCAD®10.00-20 s/n 01341 © 2017 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.84" Paoe 4 Summary for Subcatchment P2: Runoff = 8.99 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 0.561 af, Depth= 2.39" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.00-60.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.84" Area (sf) CN Description 63,123 98 Proposed Impervious 47,889 98 Existing Impervious 11,644 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 122,656 94 Weighted Average 11,644 61 9.49% Pervious Area 111,012 98 90.51 % Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.84" Paoe 4 339505Proposed Conditions (7-18-17) Prepared by Hakanson Anderson HvdroCAD®10.00-20 s/n 01341 © 2017 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.84" Paoe 5 Summary for Subcatchment P3: Runoff = 0.32 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 0.018 af, Depth= 2.25" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/lmperv., Time Span= 0.00-60.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.84" Area (sf) CN Description * 3,444 98 Proposed Impervious 646 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 4,090 92 Weighted Average 646 61 15.79% Pervious Area 3,444 98 84.21% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 7.0 Direct Entry, MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.84" Paoe 5 339505Proposed Conditions (7-18-17) Prepared by Hakanson Anderson HvdroCAD®10.00-20 s/n 01341 © 2017 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Pond STORMTECH: Inflow Area = 4.298 ac, 88.96% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.35" for 2 -Year event Inflow = 13.50 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 0.843 of Outflow = 2.34 cfs @ 12.57 hrs, Volume= 0.843 af, Atten= 83%, Lag= 24.2 min Discarded = 0.52 cfs @ 10.90 hrs, Volume= 0.633 of Primary = 1.82 cfs @ 12.57 hrs, Volume= 0.210 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-60.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs / 2 Peak Elev= 950.93' @ 12.57 hrs Surf.Area= 14,020 sf Storage= 17,218 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 162.6 min calculated for 0.843 of (100% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 162.5 min ( 921.9 - 759.4 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1A 949.00' 5,071 cf 17.75'W x 267.06'L x 3.75'H Field A 17,776 cf Overall - 5,099 cf Embedded = 12,677 cf x 40.0% Voids #2A 949.75' 5,099 cf ADS_StormTech SC -740 +Cap x 111 Inside #1 Effective Size= 44.6"W x 30.0"H => 6.45 sf x 7.121 = 45.9 cf Overall Size= 51.0"W x 30.0"H x 7.561 with 0.44' Overlap 3 Rows of 37 Chambers #3B 949.00' 9,161 cf 34.75'W x 267.06'L x 3.75'H Field B 34,801 cf Overall - 11,898 cf Embedded = 22,902 cf x 40.0% Voids #41B 949.75' 11,898 cf ADS _StormTech SC -740 +Cap x 259 Inside #3 Effective Size= 44.6"W x 30.0"H => 6.45 sf x 7.121 = 45.9 cf Overall Size= 51.0"W x 30.0"H x 7.561 with 0.44' Overlap 7 Rows of 37 Chambers #5 952.75' 32,137 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) -Impervious 63,367 cf Total Available Storage Storage Group A created with Chamber Wizard Storage Group B created with Chamber Wizard MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.84" Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sg-ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 952.75 20 0 0 954.18 20 29 29 954.35 1,229 106 135 955.00 8,948 3,308 3,442 956.00 48,442 28,695 32,137 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Discarded 949.00' 1.600 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area #2 Primary 950.22' 18.0" Round Culvert L=354.0' Ke= 0.500 Inlet/ Outlet Invert= 950.22'/ 948.90' S=0.0037? Cc= 0.900 n=0.012, Flow Area= 1.77 sf Discarded OutFlow Max=0.52 cfs @ 10.90 hrs HW=949.08' (Free Discharge) t1=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.52 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=1.82 cfs @ 12.57 hrs HW=950.93' (Free Discharge) L2=Culvert (Barrel Controls 1.82 cfs @ 3.24 fps) Pace 6 339505Proposed Conditions (7-18-17) MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.84" Prepared by Hakanson Anderson HvdroCAD®10.00-20 s/n 01341 © 2017 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pana 7 Pond STORMTECH: - Chamber Wizard Field A Chamber Model = ADS_StormTech SC -740 +Cap (ADS StormTech® SC -740 with cap length) Effective Size= 44.6"W x 30.0"H => 6.45 sf x 7.121 = 45.9 cf Overall Size= 51.0"W x 30.0"H x 7.561 with 0.44' Overlap 51.0" Wide + 18.0" Spacing = 69.0" C -C Row Spacing 37 Chambers/Row x 7.12' Long +0.81' Cap Length x 2 = 265.06' Row Length +12.0" End Stone x 2 = 267.06' Base Length 3 Rows x 51.0" Wide + 18.0" Spacing x 2 + 12.0" Side Stone x 2 = 17.75' Base Width 9.0" Base + 30.0" Chamber Height + 6.0" Cover= 3.75' Field Height 111 Chambers x 45.9 cf = 5,099.3 cf Chamber Storage 17,776.0 cf Field - 5,099.3 cf Chambers = 12,676.6 cf Stone x 40.0% Voids = 5,070.6 cf Stone Storage Chamber Storage + Stone Storage = 10,170.0 cf = 0.233 of Overall Storage Efficiency = 57.2% Overall System Size = 267.06'x 17.75'x 3.75' 111 Chambers 658.4 cy Field 469.5 cy Stone 339505Proposed Conditions (7-18-17) MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.84" Prepared by Hakanson Anderson HvdroCADO 10.00-20 s/n 01341 © 2017 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pace 8 Pond STORMTECH: - Chamber Wizard Field B Chamber Model = ADS _StormTech SC -740 +Cap (ADS StormTech® SC -740 with cap length) Effective Size= 44.6"W x 30.0"H => 6.45 sf x 7.121 = 45.9 cf Overall Size= 51.0"W x 30.0"H x 7.56'L with 0.44' Overlap 51.0" Wide + 6.0" Spacing = 57.0" C -C Row Spacing 37 Chambers/Row x 7.12' Long +0.81' Cap Length x 2 = 265.06' Row Length +12.0" End Stone x 2 = 267.06' Base Length 7 Rows x 51.0" Wide + 6.0" Spacing x 6 + 12.0" Side Stone x 2 = 34.75' Base Width 9.0" Base + 30.0" Chamber Height + 6.0" Cover = 3.75' Field Height 259 Chambers x 45.9 of = 11,898.5 cf Chamber Storage 34,800.8 cf Field - 11,898.5 cf Chambers = 22,902.4 cf Stone x 40.0% Voids = 9,160.9 cf Stone Storage Chamber Storage + Stone Storage = 21,059.4 cf = 0.483 of Overall Storage Efficiency = 60.5% Overall System Size = 267.06'x 34.75'x 3.75' 259 Chambers 1,288.9 cy Field 848.2 cy Stone 339505Proposed Conditions (7-18-17) MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.22" Prepared by Hakanson Anderson HvdroCAD®10.00-20 s/n 01341 © 2017 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paae 9 Time span=0.00-60.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs, 1201 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv. Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Subcatchment P1: Runoff Area=64,558 sf 86.02% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.56" Tc=10.0 min CN=61198 Runoff=6.94 cfs 0.439 of Subcatchment P2: Runoff Area=122,656 sf 90.51% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.69" Tc=10.0 min CN=61/98 Runoff=13.70 cfs 0.867 of Subcatchment P3: Runoff Area=4,090 sf 84.21% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.50" Tc=7.0 min CN=61/98 Runoff=0.49 cfs 0.027 of Pond STORMTECH: Peak Elev=951.65' Storage=24,136 cf Inflow=20.65 cfs 1.306 of Discarded=0.52 cfs 0.751 of Primary=5.80 cfs 0.555 of Outflow=6.32 cfs 1.306 of Total Runoff Area = 4.392 ac Runoff Volume = 1.334 of Average Runoff Depth = 3.64" 11.14% Pervious = 0.489 ac 88.86% Impervious = 3.902 ac 339505Proposed Conditions (7-18-17) Prepared by Hakanson Anderson HvdroCAD®10.00-20 s/n 01341 © 2017 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.22" Paae 10 Summary for Subcatchment P1: Runoff = 6.94 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 0.439 af, Depth= 3.56" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.00-60.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.22" Area (sf) CN Description * 36,814 98 Proposed Impervious * 18,718 98 Existing Impervious 9,026 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 64,558 93 Weighted Average 9,026 61 13.98% Pervious Area 55,532 98 86.02% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (fUft) (fUsec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.22" Paae 10 339505Proposed Conditions (7-18-17) Prepared by Hakanson Anderson HvdroCAD(D10.00-20 s/n 01341 © 2017 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.22" Paae 11 Summary for Subcatchment P2: Runoff = 13.70 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 0.867 af, Depth= 3.69" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.00-60.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.22" Area (sf) CN Description * 63,123 98 Proposed Impervious * 47,889 98 Existing Impervious 11,644 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 122,656 94 Weighted Average 11,644 61 9.49% Pervious Area 111,012 98 90.51% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.22" Paae 11 339505Proposed Conditions (7-18-17) Prepared by Hakanson Anderson HvdroCAD®10.00-20 s/n 01341 © 2017 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.22" Paoe 12 Summary for Subcatchment P3: Runoff = 0.49 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 0.027 af, Depth= 3.50" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.00-60.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.22" Area (sf) CN Description 3,444 98 Proposed Impervious 646 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 4,090 92 Weighted Average 646 61 15.79% Pervious Area 3,444 98 84.21 % Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 7.0 Direct Entry, MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.22" Paoe 12 339505Proposed Conditions (7-18-17) Prepared by Hakanson Anderson HvdroCAD(D10.00-20 s/n 01341 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Pond STORMTECH: Inflow Area = 4.298 ac, 88.96% Impervious, Inflow Depth= 3.65" for 10 -Year event Inflow = 20.65 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 1.306 of Outflow = 6.32 cfs @ 12.42 hrs, Volume= 1.306 af, Atten= 69%, Lag= 14.8 min Discarded = 0.52 cfs @ 10.05 hrs, Volume= 0.751 of Primary = 5.80 cfs @ 12.42 hrs, Volume= 0.555 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-60.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs / 2 Peak Elev= 951.65' @ 12.42 hrs Surf.Area= 14,020 sf Storage= 24,136 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 135.4 min calculated for 1.306 of (100% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 135.3 min ( 889.3 - 754.0 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1A 949.00' 5,071 cf 17.75'W x 267.06'L x 3.75'H Field A 17,776 cf Overall - 5,099 cf Embedded = 12,677 cf x 40.0% Voids #2A 949.75' 5,099 cf ADS _StormTech SC -740 +Cap x 111 Inside #1 Effective Size= 44.6"W x 30.0"H => 6.45 sf x 7.121 = 45.9 cf Overall Size= 51.0"W x 30.0"H x 7.561 with 0.44' Overlap 3 Rows of 37 Chambers #36 949.00' 9,161 cf 34.75'W x 267.06%x 3.75'H Field B 34,801 cf Overall - 11,898 cf Embedded = 22,902 cf x 40.0% Voids #413 949.75' 11,898 cf ADS _StormTech SC -740 +Cap x 259 Inside #3 Effective Size= 44.6"W x 30.0"H => 6.45 sf x 7.121 = 45.9 cf Overall Size= 51.0"W x 30.0"H x 7.561 with 0.44' Overlap 7 Rows of 37 Chambers #5 952.75' 32,137 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) -Impervious 63,367 cf Total Available Storage Storage Group A created with Chamber Wizard Storage Group B created with Chamber Wizard MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.22" Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq -ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 952.75 20 0 0 954.18 20 29 29 954.35 1,229 106 135 955.00 8,948 3,308 3,442 956.00 48,442 28,695 32,137 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Discarded 949.00' 1.600 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area #2 Primary 950.22' 18.0" Round Culvert L=354.0' Ke= 0.500 Inlet/ Outlet Invert= 950.22'/948.90' S=0.0037'/' Cc= 0.900 n=0.012, Flow Area= 1.77 sf Discarded OutFlow Max=0.52 cfs @ 10.05 hrs HW=949.07' (Free Discharge) 1-1=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.52 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=5.79 cfs @ 12.42 hrs HW=951.65' (Free Discharge) t2=Culvert (Barrel Controls 5.79 cfs @ 4.29 fps) Paae 13 339505Proposed Conditions (7-18-17) MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.22" Prepared by Hakanson Anderson HvdroCADO 10.00-20 s/n 01341 © 2017 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paae 14 Pond STORMTECH: - Chamber Wizard Field A Chamber Model = ADS _StormTech SC -740 +Cap (ADS StormTech® SC -740 with cap length) Effective Size= 44.6"W x 30.0"H => 6.45 sf x 7.121 = 45.9 cf Overall Size= 51.0"W x 30.0"H x 7.561 with 0.44' Overlap 51.0" Wide + 18.0" Spacing = 69.0" C -C Row Spacing 37 Chambers/Row x 7.12' Long +0.81' Cap Length x 2 = 265.06' Row Length +12.0" End Stone x 2 = 267.06' Base Length 3 Rows x 51.0" Wide + 18.0" Spacing x 2 + 12.0" Side Stone x 2 = 17.75' Base Width 9.0" Base + 30.0" Chamber Height + 6.0" Cover = 3.75' Field Height 111 Chambers x 45.9 cf = 5,099.3 cf Chamber Storage 17,776.0 cf Field - 5,099.3 cf Chambers = 12,676.6 cf Stone x 40.0% Voids = 5,070.6 cf Stone Storage Chamber Storage + Stone Storage = 10,170.0 cf = 0.233 of Overall Storage Efficiency = 57.2% Overall System Size = 267.06'x 17.75'x 3.75' 111 Chambers 658.4 cy Field 469.5 cy Stone 339505Proposed Conditions (7-18-17) MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.22" Prepared by Hakanson Anderson HvdroCADO 10.00-20 s/n 01341 © 2017 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paae 15 Pond STORMTECH: - Chamber Wizard Field B Chamber Model = ADS _StormTech SC -740 +Cap (ADS StormTech® SC -740 with cap length) Effective Size= 44.6"W x 30.0"H => 6.45 sf x 7.121 = 45.9 cf Overall Size= 51.0"W x 30.0"H x 7.561 with 0.44' Overlap 51.0" Wide + 6.0" Spacing = 57.0" C -C Row Spacing 37 Chambers/Row x 7.12' Long +0.81' Cap Length x 2 = 265.06' Row Length +12.0" End Stone x 2 = 267.06' Base Length 7 Rows x 51.0" Wide + 6.0" Spacing x 6 + 12.0" Side Stone x 2 = 34.75' Base Width 9.0" Base + 30.0" Chamber Height + 6.0" Cover = 3.75' Field Height 259 Chambers x 45.9 cf = 11,898.5 cf Chamber Storage 34,800.8 cf Field - 11,898.5 cf Chambers = 22,902.4 cf Stone x 40.0% Voids = 9,160.9 cf Stone Storage Chamber Storage + Stone Storage = 21,059.4 cf = 0.483 of Overall Storage Efficiency = 60.5% Overall System Size = 267.06'x 34.75'x 3.75' 259 Chambers 1,288.9 cy Field 848.2 cy Stone 339505Proposed Conditions (7-18-17) MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=6.87" Prepared by Hakanson Anderson HvdroCADO 10.00-20 s/n 01341 © 2017 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paae 16 Time span=0.00-60.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs, 1201 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv. Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Subcatchment P1: Runoff Area=64,558 sf 86.02% Impervious Runoff Depth=6.07" Tc=10.0 min CN=61/98 Runoff=11.75 cfs 0.750 of Subcatchment P2: Runoff Area=1 22,656 sf 90.51% Impervious Runoff Depth=6.25" Tc=10.0 min CN=61/98 Runoff=22.93 cfs 1.466 of Subcatchment P3: Runoff Area=4,090 sf 84.21% Impervious Runoff Depth=6.00" Tc=7.0 min CN=61/98 Runoff=0.83 cfs 0.047 of Pond STORMTECH: Peak Elev=955.25' Storage=38,170 cf Inflow=34.68 cis 2.216 of Discarded=0.52 cis 0.913 of Primary=11.79 cfs 1.303 of Outflow=12.31 cis 2.216 of Total Runoff Area= 4.392 ac Runoff Volume= 2.263 of Average Runoff Depth= 6.18" 11.14% Pervious= 0.489 ac 88.86% Impervious = 3.902 ac 339505Proposed Conditions (7-18-17) Prepared by Hakanson Anderson HvdroCADO 10.00-20 s/n 01341 © 2017 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment P1: Runoff = 11.75 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 0.750 af, Depth= 6.07" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.00-60.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.87' Area (so CN Description * 36,814 98 Proposed Impervious * 18,718 98 Existing Impervious 9,026 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 64,558 93 Weighted Average 9,026 61 13.98% Pervious Area 55,532 98 86.02% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/fo (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, MSE 24 -hr 3 900 -Year Rainfall=6.87' Paae 17 3395051Proposed Conditions (7-18-17) Prepared by Hakanson Anderson HvdroCADO 10.00-20 s/n 01341 © 2017 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment P2: Runoff = 22.93 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 1.466 af, Depth= 6.25' Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.00-60.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.87" Area (sf) CN Description * 63,123 98 Proposed Impervious * 47,889 98 Existing Impervious 11,644 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 122,656 94 Weighted Average 11,644 61 9.49% Pervious Area 111,012 98 90.51 % Impervious Area To Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.87" Paae 18 339505Proposed Conditions (7-18-17) Prepared by Hakanson Anderson HvdroCAD®10.00-20 s/n 01341 © 2017 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment P3: Runoff = 0.83 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 0.047 af, Depth= 6.00" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.00-60.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.87" Area (sf) CN Description 3,444 98 Proposed Impervious 646 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 4,090 92 Weighted Average 646 61 15.79% Pervious Area 3,444 98 84.21% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 7.0 Direct Entry, MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.87' Paae 19, 339505Proposed Conditions (7-18-17) Prepared by Hakanson Anderson HvdroCAD®10.00-20 s/n 01341 © 2017 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Pond STORMTECH: Inflow Area = 4.298 ac, 88.96% Impervious, Inflow Depth= 6.19" for 100 -Year event Inflow = 34.68 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 2.216 of Outflow = 12.31 cfs @ 12.38 hrs, Volume= 2.216 af, Atten= 64%, Lag= 12.7 min Discarded = 0.52 cfs @ 9.15 hrs, Volume= 0.913 of Primary = 11.79 cfs @ 12.38 hrs, Volume= 1.303 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-60.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs / 2 Peak Elev= 955.25' @ 12.38 hrs Surf.Area= 14,020 sf Storage= 38,170 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 111.7 min calculated for 2.214 of (100% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 111.8 min ( 860.5 - 748.7 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storaqe Description #1A 949.00' 5,071 cf 17.75'W x 267.061 x 3.75'H Field A 17,776 cf Overall - 5,099 cf Embedded = 12,677 cf x 40.0% Voids #2A 949.75' 5,099 cf ADS_StormTech SC -740 +Cap x 111 Inside #1 Effective Size= 44.6"W x 30.0"H => 6.45 sf x 7.121 = 45.9 cf Overall Size= 51.0"W x 30.0"H x 7.561 with 0.44' Overlap 3 Rows of 37 Chambers #36 949.00' 9,161 cf 34.75'W x 267.061 x 3.75'H Field B 34,801 cf Overall - 11,898 cf Embedded = 22,902 cf x 40.0% Voids #48 949.75' 11,898 cf ADS_StormTech SC -740 +Cap x 259 Inside #3 Effective Size= 44.6"W x 30.0"H => 6.45 sf x 7.121 = 45.9 cf Overall Size= 51.0"W x 30.0"H x 7.561 with 0.44' Overlap 7 Rows of 37 Chambers #5 952.75' 32,137 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) -Impervious 63,367 cf Total Available Storage Storage Group A created with Chamber Wizard Storage Group B created with Chamber Wizard MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.87" Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq -ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 952.75 20 0 0 954.18 20 29 29 954.35 1,229 106 135 955.00 8,948 3,308 3,442 956.00 48,442 28,695 32,137 Device Routinq Invert Outlet Devices #1 Discarded 949.00' 1.600 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area #2 Primary 950.22' 18.0" Round Culvert L=354.0' Ke= 0.500 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 950.22'/ 948.90' S=0.0037'1' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.012, Flow Area= 1.77 sf Discarded OutFlow Max=0.52 cfs @ 9.15 hrs HW=949.07' (Free Discharge) 'L1=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.52 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=11.79 cfs @ 12.38 hrs HW=955.25' (Free Discharge) t2=Culvert (Barrel Controls 11.79 cfs @ 6.67 fps) Dsgp! i() 339505Proposed Conditions (7-18-17) MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.87" Prepared by Hakanson Anderson HvdroCAD®10.00-20 s/n 01341 © 2017 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paoe 21 Pond STORMTECH: - Chamber Wizard Field A Chamber Model = ADS_StormTech SC -740 +Cap (ADS StormTech® SC -740 with cap length) Effective Size= 44.6"W x 30.0"H => 6.45 sf x 7.121 = 45.9 cf Overall Size= 51.0"W x 30.0"H x 7.561 with 0.44' Overlap 51.0" Wide + 18.0" Spacing = 69.0" C -C Row Spacing 37 Chambers/Row x 7.12' Long +0.81' Cap Length x 2 = 265.06' Row Length +12.0" End Stone x 2 = 267.06' Base Length 3 Rows x 51.0" Wide + 18.0" Spacing x 2 + 12.0" Side Stone x 2 = 17.75' Base Width 9.0" Base + 30.0" Chamber Height + 6.0" Cover = 3.75' Field Height 111 Chambers x 45.9 cf = 5,099.3 cf Chamber Storage 17,776.0 cf Field - 5,099.3 cf Chambers = 12,676.6 cf Stone x 40.0% Voids = 5,070.6 cf Stone Storage Chamber Storage + Stone Storage = 10,170.0 cf = 0.233 of Overall Storage Efficiency = 57.2% Overall System Size = 267.06'x 17.75'x 3.75' 111 Chambers 658.4 cy Field 469.5 cy Stone 339505Proposed Conditions (7-18-17) MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.87" Prepared by Hakanson Anderson HvdroCAD®10.00-20 s/n 01341 © 2017 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC PaoP 22 Pond STORMTECH: - Chamber Wizard Field B Chamber Model = ADS_StormTech SC -740 +Cap (ADS StormTech® SC -740 with cap length) Effective Size= 44.6"W x 30.0"H => 6.45 sf x 7.12'L = 45.9 cf Overall Size= 51.0"W x 30.0"H x 7.561 with 0.44' Overlap 51.0" Wide + 6.0" Spacing = 57.0" C -C Row Spacing 37 Chambers/Row x 7.12' Long +0.81' Cap Length x 2 = 265.06' Row Length +12.0" End Stone x 2 = 267.06' Base Length 7 Rows x 51.0" Wide + 6.0" Spacing x 6 + 12.0" Side Stone x 2 = 34.75' Base Width 9.0" Base + 30.0" Chamber Height + 6.0" Cover = 3.75' Field Height 259 Chambers x 45.9 cf = 11,898.5 cf Chamber Storage 34,800.8 cf Field - 11,898.5 cf Chambers = 22,902.4 cf Stone x 40.0% Voids = 9,160.9 cf Stone Storage Chamber Storage + Stone Storage = 21,059.4 cf = 0.483 of Overall Storage Efficiency = 60.5% Overall System Size = 267.06'x 34.75'x 3.75' 259 Chambers 1,288.9 cy Field 848.2 cy Stone Drainage Calculations — Regional Pond (2-1 10- and 100 -Year Storm Events) MEN Subcat Reach Pon Link Routing Diagram for 33950513roposed Conditions -Regional Ponds (7-18-17) Prepared by Hakanson Anderson HydroCADO 10.00-20 s/n 01341 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 339505Proposed Conditions -Regional Ponds (7-18-17) MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.84" Prepared by Hakanson Anderson HvdroCAD®10.00-20 s/n 01341 © 2017 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paae 2 Time span=0.00-60.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs, 1201 points Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv. Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Subcatchment P1-87: Runoff Area=64,558 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.60" Tc=10.0 min CN=87/0 Runoff=3.59 ofs 0.198 of Subcatchment P2-87: Runoff Area=122,656 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.60" Tc=10.0 min CN=87/0 Runoff=6.82 cfs 0.375 of Subcatchment P3-87: Runoff Area=4,090 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.60" Tc=7.0 min CN=87/0 Runoff=0.26 ofs 0.013 of Total Runoff Area= 4.392 ac Runoff Volume= 0.586 of Average Runoff Depth =1.60" 100.00% Pervious = 4.392 ac 0.00% Impervious = 0.000 ac 339505Proposed Conditions -Regional Ponds (7-18-17) Prepared by Hakanson Anderson HvdroCADD 10.00-20 s/n 01341 © 2017 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment P1-87: Runoff = 3.59 cfs @ 12.18 hrs, Volume= 0.198 af, Depth= 1.60" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.00-60.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.84" Area (sf) CN Description * 64,558 87 64,558 87 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment P2-87: Runoff = 6.82 cfs @ 12.18 hrs, Volume= 0.375 af, Depth= 1.60" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.00-60.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.84" Area (sf) CN Description 122,656 87 122,656 87 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment P3-87: Runoff = 0.26 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 0.013 af, Depth= 1.60" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.00-60.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.84" Area (sf) CN Description * 4,090 87 4,090 87 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 7.0 Direct Entry, MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.84" Paae 3 339505Proposed Conditions -Regional Ponds (7-18-17) MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.22" Prepared by Hakanson Anderson HvdroCAD®10.00-20 s/n 01341 © 2017 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pao_ P 4 Time span=0.00-60.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs, 1201 points Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/]mperv. Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Subcatchment P1-87: RunoffArea=64,558 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.84" Tc=10.0 min CN=87/0 Runoff=6.27 cfs 0.351 of Subcatchment P2-87: Runoff Area=122,656 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.84" Tc=10.0 min CN=87/0 Runoff=11.92 cfs 0.666 of Subcatchment 133-87: Runoff Area=4,090 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.84" Tc=7.0 min CN=87/0 Runoff=0.45 cfs 0.022 of Total Runoff Area= 4.392 ac Runoff Volume= 1.039 of Average Runoff Depth= 2.84" 100.00% Pervious =4.392 ac 0.00% Impervious= 0.000 ac 339505Proposed Conditions -Regional Ponds (7-18-17) Prepared by Hakanson Anderson HvdroCAD®10.00-20 s/n 01341 © 2017 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment P1-87: Runoff = 6.27 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 0.351 af, Depth= 2.84" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/]mperv., Time Span= 0.00-60.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.22" Area (sf) CN Description 64,558 87 64,558 87 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment P2-87: Runoff = 11.92 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 0.666 af, Depth= 2.84" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.00-60.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.22" Area (sf) CN Description 122,656 87 122,656 87 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment P3-87: Runoff = 0.45 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 0.022 af, Depth= 2.84" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.00-60.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.22" Area (sf) CN Description 4,090 87 4,090 87 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 7.0 Direct Entry, MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.22" Pans 5 339505Proposed Conditions -Regional Ponds (7-18-17) MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.87' Prepared by Hakanson Anderson HvdroCAD®10.00-20 s/n 01341 © 2017 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC P20P. 6 Time span=0.00-60.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs, 1201 points Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv. Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Subcatchment P1-87: Runoff Area=64,558sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=5.35" Tc=10.0 min CN=87/0 Runoff=11.46 cfs 0.661 of Subcatchment P2-87: Runoff Area=122,656 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=5.35' Tc=10.0 min CN=87/0 Runoff=21.78 cfs 1.256 of Subcatchment P3-87: Runoff Area=4,090 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=5.35" Tc=7.0 min CN=87/0 Runoff=0.82 cfs 0.042 of Total Runoff Area= 4.392 ac Runoff Volume =1.959 of Average Runoff Depth= 5.35" 100.00% Pervious = 4.392 ac 0.00% Impervious = 0.000 ac 339505Proposed Conditions -Regional Ponds (7-18-17) Prepared by Hakanson Anderson HvdroCADO 10.00-20 s/n 01341 © 2017 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment P1-87: Runoff = 11.46 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 0.661 af, Depth= 5.35' Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.00-60.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.87' Area (sf) CN Description * 64,558 87 64,558 87 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment P2-87: Runoff = 21.78 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 1.256 af, Depth= 5.35' Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.00-60.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.87' Area (sf) CN Description * 122,656 87 122,656 87 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment P3-87: Runoff = 0.82 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 0.042 af, Depth= 5.35' Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.00-60.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.87' Area (sf) CN Description * 4,090 87 4,090 87 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 7.0 Direct Entry, MSE 24 -hr 3 900 -Year Rainfall=6.87' Pace 7 U!j!j:d-L1 I-11 v4 -FA I Infiltration Calculations 339505Proposed Conditions (7-18-17) Prepared by Hakanson Anderson HvdroCAD®10.00-20 s/n 01341 © 2017 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Pond STORMTECH: Inflow = 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 of Outflow = 0.52 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0.220 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Discarded = 0.52 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0.220 of Primary = 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-60.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs / 2 Starting Elev= 950.22' Surf.Area= 14,020 sf Storage= 9,554 cf Peak Elev= 950.22'@ 0.00 hrs Surf.Area= 14,020 sf Storage= 9,554 cf Plug -Flow detention time= (not calculated: no plugs found) Center -of -Mass det. time= (not calculated: no inflow) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storaqe Description #1A 949.00' 5,071 cf 17.75'W x 267.06'L x 3.75'H Field A 17,776 cf Overall - 5,099 cf Embedded = 12,677 cf x 40.0% Voids #2A 949.75' 5,099 cf ADS _StormTech SC -740 +Cap x 111 Inside #1 Effective Size= 44.6"W x 30.0"H => 6.45 sf x 7.121 = 45.9 cf Overall Size= 51.0"W x 30.0"H x 7.561 with 0.44' Overlap 3 Rows of 37 Chambers #313 949.00' 9,161 cf 34.75'W x 267.061 x 3.75'H Field B 34,801 cf Overall - 11,898 cf Embedded = 22,902 cf x 40.0% Voids #413 949.75' 11,898 cf ADS _StormTech SC -740 +Cap x 259 Inside #3 Effective Size= 44.6"W x 30.0"H => 6.45 sf x 7.121 = 45.9 cf Overall Size= 51.0"W x 30.0"H x 7.561 with 0.44' Overlap 7 Rows of 37 Chambers #5 952.75' 32,137 cf Custom Staple Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) -Impervious 63,367 cf Total Available Storage Storage Group A created with Chamber Wizard Storage Group B created with Chamber Wizard MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.84" Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq -ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 952.75 20 0 0 954.18 20 29 29 954.35 1,229 106 135 955.00 8,948 3,308 3,442 956.00 48,442 28,695 32,137 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Discarded 949.00' 1.600 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area #2 Primary 950.22' 18.0" Round Culvert L=354.0' Ke= 0.500 Inlet/ Outlet Invert= 950.22'/ 948.90' S=0.0037'/' Cc= 0.900 n=0.012, Flow Area= 1.77 sf Discarded OutFlow Max=0.52 cfs @ 0.00 hrs HW=950.22' (Free Discharge) t1=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.52 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs HW=950.22' (Free Discharge) 't-2=Culvert ( Controls 0.00 cfs) 339505Proposed Conditions (7-18-17) Prepared by Hakanson Anderson HvdroCAD®10.00-20 s/n 01341 © 2017 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Hydrograph for Pond STORMTECH: Time Inflow Storage Elevation Outflow Discarded Primary (hours) (cfs) (cubic -feet) (feet) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) 0.00 0.00 9,554 950.22 0.52 0.52 0.00 0.50 0.00 8,619 950.14 0.52 0.52 0.00 1.00 0.00 7,685 950.05 0.52 0.52 0.00 1.50 0.00 6,750 949.97 0.52 0.52 0.00 2.00 0.00 5,815 949.89 0.52 0.52 0.00 2.50 0.00 4,881 949.81 0.52 0.52 0.00 3.00 0.00 3,946 949.70 0.52 0.52 0.00 3.50 0.00 3,011 949.54 0.52 0.52 0.00 4.00 0.00 2,077 949.37 0.52 0.52 0.00 4.50 0.00 1,142 949.20 0.52 0.52 0.00 5.00 0.00 245 949.04 0.32 0.32 0.00 5.50 0.00 23 949.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 6.00 0.00 2 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.50 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.00 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.50 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.00 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.50 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.00 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.50 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.50 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.00 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.50 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.00 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.50 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.00 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.50 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.00 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.50 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 15.00 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 15.50 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 16.00 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 16.50 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 17.00 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 17.50 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 18.00 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 18.50 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 19.00 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 19.50 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.00 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.50 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 21.00 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 21.50 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 22.00 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 22.50 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 23.00 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 23.50 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 24.00 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 24.50 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 25.00 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 25.50 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 26.00 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 26.50 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 27.00 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 27.50 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 28.00 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 28.50 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 29.00 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 29.50 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30.00 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30.50 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 .0.00 0.00 31.00 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 31.50 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.00 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.50 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 33.00 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 33.50 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 34.00 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 34.50 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 35.00 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 35.50 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 36.00 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 36.50 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 37.00 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 37.50 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 38.00 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 38.50 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 39.00 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 39.50 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 40.00 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 40.50 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 41.00 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 41.50 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 42.00 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 42.50 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 43.00 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 43.50 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.84" Time Inflow Storage Elevation Outflow Discarded Primary (hours) (cfs) (cubic -feet) (feet) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) 44.00 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 44.50 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 45.00 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 45.50 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 46.00 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 46.50 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 47.00 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 47.50 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 48.00 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 48.50 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 .49.00 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 49.50 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.00 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.50 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 51.00 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 51.50 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 52.00 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 52.50 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 53.00 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 53.50 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 54.00 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 54.50 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 55.00 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 55.50 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 56.00 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 56.50 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 57.00 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 57.50 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 58.00 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 58.50 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 59.00 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 59.50 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 60.00 0.00 0 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Atlas 14 Rainfall Table Precipitation Frequency Data Server http://hdse.nws.noaa. gov/hdsc/pfds/pfds_printp age.html?lat=45.2994&1... NOAA Atlas 14, Volume 8, Version 2 0.375 (0.309-0.460) Location name: Monticello, Minnesota, USA* Latitude: 45.2994°, Longitude: -93.8093° " Elevation: 955.38 fe* ' 'source: ESRI Maps 0.801 "source: USGS 1.12 POINT PRECIPITATION FREQUENCY ESTIMATES 143 158 180 196 I I Sanja Pence, Deborah Martin, Sandra Pavlovic, Ishani Roy, Mchael SL Laurent, Carl Trypaluk, Dale Unruh, Michael Yekta, Geofiery Bonnin (0.761-1.15)I NOAA, National Weather Service, Silver Spring, Maryland PF tabula rIPF arap,hical I MaDs & aerials PF tabular PDS -based point precipitation frequency estimates with 90% confidence intervals (in inches)1 jAverage recurrence interval (years) j Duratior IF ' II 2 II 5 11 10 11 25 II 50 11 100 11 200 11 500 11 1000 I i I [S -min I �u 0.375 (0.309-0.460) 0.440 (0.361-0.538) 0.547 (0.448-0.671) 0.638 0.767 0.869 0.973 1.08 1.23 134 (0.519-0.786) (0.603-0.974) (0.666-1.12) ((0.719-1.28) (0.765-1.45) (0.633-1.69) (0.885-1.87) 0.550 j[10 0.644 0.801 0.934 1.12 1.27 143 158 180 196 I I -min (0.452-0.673) (0.529-0.788) (0.656-0.983) (0.761-1.15)I (0.883-1.43) (0.976-1.64) (1.05-1.87) (1 12-2" 2 13) (1.22-2.47) (1-.74)1 15 -min 0.670 0.785 0.976 1.14 1.37 1.55 1.74 1.93 2.19 2.39 1 1 j (0.552-0.821) (0.645-0.962) (0.800-1.20) (0.927-1.40) (1.08-1.74j (1.19-1.99) (1.28-2.28) (1.36-2.59) (1.49-3.02) (1.58-3.34) 0.903 1.06 1.33 1.55 1.87 2.13 2.38 2.65 3 01 3.29 30 -min (0.743-1.10) (0.873-1.30) (1.09-1.63) (1.27-1.92) (1.47-2 38) (1.63-2.73) (1.76-3.13) (1.87-3.56) (2 04 4 15) _(_2._l7-4 59) 60 -min 1.15 (0.943-1.40) 1.36 (1.11-1.66) 1.71 _ (1.40-2.10) Ji 2.02 (1.65-2.491 2.46 (1.94-3.14)_ 2.82 (2.17-3.64) 3.19 I 3.56 4.11 4.53 (2.36-4.20)11 (2.53-4.82) (2.79-5.67) (2.99-6.32) 4.00 4.51 5.21 II 5.77 2 hr 1.39 1.65 2.10 2.49 3.06 3.52 _ (1.15-1.69) (1.37-2.01) (1.73-2.56) (2.04-3.04) (2.43-3.88) (2.72-4.51) (2.98-5.23) (3.22-6.04) (3.57-7.15) (3.84-7.99) 3 -hr 1.55 1.84 2.35 2.80 3.46 1 4.01 4.58 1 5.20 6.05 6.74 (1.29-1.87) (1.53-2.22) (1.94-2.85) (2.30-3.41) (2.77-4.38) (3.12-5.12) (3.43-5.98) (3.72-6.94) (4.16-8.28) (4.49-9.29) 1 6 -hr 1.83 I�� (1.53-2.19) 2.17 2.76 (1.61-2.60) (2.30-3.33) 3.30 (2.74-3.99), 4.11 (3.31-5.18) 4.78 (3.75-6.08) 5.49 1(4.15-7.13) 6.26 7.35 (4.53-8.32) (5.10-10.0) 7.09 8.33 (5.17-9.36) (5.82-11.3) 8.23 (5.53-11.3) 9.33 (6.31-12.7) 12 -hr 2.13 (1.79-2.53) 2.50 (2.10-2.97) 3.16 (2.65-3.77) 3.76 11 (3.14-4.50) 4.66 , (3.79-5.83) 5.41 (4.28-6.83) 6.22 (4.74-8.02)J 24 2.43 2.84 3.57 11.. 4.22 5.19 6.00 6.86 7.78 9.09 10.1 -hr (2 06-2.87) �(2.41-3.36) (3.02-4.22) (3.55-5.02) (4.24-6.43) (4.77-7.50) (5 26-8.77) (5 71-10.2) (6.39-12.2) (6.91-13.7) 2 -day 2.78 (2.38-3.25) _ _ __ 3.23 4.02 (2.76-3.78)J (3.42-4.72) 3.51 4.29 ---- _ __1_ 4.71 (3.99-5.56) ___ __ 5.74 (4.72-7.04) ______ 6.58 (5.27-8.15) 7.47 (5.76-9.46) _ _ 8.41 (6.21-10.9) 9.74 (6.89-12.9) __, 10.8 (7.41-14.5)j 3 3.06 4.99 6.02 6.871 7.77 8.74 10.1 11.2 -day (2.63-3.57) 1 (3.01-4.10) (3.67-5.02) (4.24-5.86) (4.97-7.35) (5.53-8.47) (6.02-9.80) (6.47-11.3) (7.17-13.4)J (7.70-14.9) J 1 4 -day - - (2.84 3083),,1 (3.23 45 36) (3. 05429) I (4.48 6515) (5.22 7067) (5.7916.82) (6.29 10.2) (67509.7) (7.47- 3.8)� (ti 1115.4) 7 3.83 4.36 5.28 6.08 _ 7.26 8.22 9.23 10.3 11.8 13.0 1 -day (3.32-4.42) (3.78-5.04) (4.55-6.11) 1 (5.22-7.077) (6.04-8.75) 8.06 9.65) (6.66-10.0) (7.21-11.5) (7.69-13.2) (8.45-15.4) ( 11.3 ) ( 12.8 ) 8.43-14.3 9.19-16.7 (9.02-17.2) ( 14.0 ) 9.77-18.5 10 -day 4.33 (3.77-4.97) 4.92 (4.28-5.66) 5.92211 (5.13-6.83) 6.80 (5.86-7.87) I 9.08 Il (7.36-11.0) 10.1 ) (7.94-12.6 I20 5.90 6.59 7.73 8.71 10.1 11.1 12.2 13.4 14.9 16.1 -day iL _ (5.17=6.72) 1 (5.77_7.51)J1 (675-8.84) (7.55-9.99) (8.44-11.99) 1(9.12-13.3) (9.65-15.0) (10.1-16.8) (10.8-19.2) (11.3-21.OJ 30 -day 7.27 8.08 9 39 (62410.7) 10.5 12 0 (913-120) (10.0-140)_ 13.1 (10.7-15.6) 14.2 [(11.2-17.3)1.(11.619.2) 15.4 16.9 (12.2-21.6) 18.0 ..1_(6.41-8.25).1._(7.11-9.17)_... 45 -day _J ( 9.04 8.00-10.2) 1 10.1 11.7 (8.90-11.4) (10.3-13.3) 13.0 14.8 (11.4-14.8) (12.4-17.1) 16.0 (13.2-18.9) I 17.3 IL(19.7-20.8) -18.4 (14.0-22.8) 19.9 (14.5-25.4) _(12.7-23.5).. 1 21.0 (14.9-27.3) 60 10.6 11.8 7.4 20.2 23.0 24.1 -day 9.37-11.9 ( ) 10.5-13.3 ( ) 12.213.5-17.5 .2 11 ( ) . I ( ! ) . 14.7-20.1 ) �� 15.6-22.1 .6 ( ) 16.1-24.3 .3 2 ( ) (16.3-26.5) (16.8-29.1) ] (17.1-312) ( .1 1 Precipitation frequency (PF) estimates in this table are based on frequency analysis of partial duration series (PDS) Numbers in parenthesis are PF estimates at lower and upper bounds of the 90% confidence interval. The probability that precipitation frequency estimates (for a given duration and average recurrence interval) will be greater than the upper bound (or less than the lower bound) is 5%. Estimates at upper bounds are not checked against probable maximum precipitation (PMP) estimates and may be higher than currently valid PMP values. Please refer to NOAA Atlas 14 document for more information. Back to Top, PF graphical 1 of 3 3/1/2017 2:10 PM Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan For Camping World East Parking Lot Expansion Project Location: City of Monticello Wright County Section 10, Township 121, Range 25 Owner: Camping World and Good Sam 250 Parkway Drive, Suite 270 Lincolnshire, IL 60069 Contact: Walter Kucher, Construction Manager Phone: 847-229-6734 Email: construction@campingworld.com Engineer: Hakanson Anderson 3601 Thurston Avenue Anoka, MN 55303 Contact: Tim Eggerichs, P.E. Phones: (763) 852-0497 Email: time@haa-inc.com Date of Preparation: April 6, 2017 Revised July 18, 2017 Prepared By: Hakanson Anderson 3601 Thurston Avenue Anoka, Minnesota 55303 Telephone: (763) 427-5860 339505SWPPP.docx TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. DESCRIPTION.............................................................................................................1 2. LOCATION...................................................................................................................1 3. SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES..............................................1-2 4. SITE CONSIDERATIONS..........................................................................................2 4.1 Areas of Concern..............................................................................................2 5. CONTROL MEASURES.............................................................................................2 5.1 Areas of Concern ..............................................................................................2 5.2 Standard Control Measures........................................................................... 2-3 6. OTHER POTENTIAL STORMWATER POLLUTANTS ................................... 3-5 7. EROSION CONTROL INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE .......................... 5-7 8. DEWATERING AND BASIN DRAINING..............................................................8 9. POST CONSTRUCTION SITE CONDITIONS......................................................8 10. PLAN AMENDMENTS..............................................................................................8 11. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT...................................................................... 8-9 12. NON-STORMWATER MANAGEMENT................................................................9 13. CONSTRUCTION CHEMICAL AND POLLUTANTS.........................................9 13.1 Spill Prevention........................................................................................... 9-10 13.2 Spill Control Practices...................................................................................10 14. HOUSEKEEPING BMP'S.......................................................................................11 15. SEED MIXES.............................................................................................................11 16. LONG TERM MAINTENANCE.............................................................................11 FIGURE 1 — Proposed Drainage Areas APPENDIX A — Construction Plans APPENDIX B Design Certifications APPENDIX C General Permit Authorization to Discharge Stormwater Associated with Construction Activity Under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System/State Disposal System Program APPENDIX D Project Soil Information TC -1 1.0 DESCRIPTION This project will include a 103,381 square foot expansion of an existing bituminous parking lot in the City of Monticello, Minnesota. The work will include clearing and grubbing, removals, site grading, storm water improvements and restoration. This Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) will satisfy the requirements of the NPDES General Permit No. MN R 10000 1 for the State of Minnesota. This SWPPP is designed to (1) identify all potential sources of pollution which may reasonably be expected to affect stormwater discharges from the site; (2) describe the practices to be used to reduce pollutants in stormwater discharges from the site; and (3) assure compliance with the terms and conditions of the NPDES General Permit No. MN R100001. The SWPPP will be implemented at the site from the commencement of construction activity until the completion of final stabilization. Stormwater discharges from this site are subject to the City of Monticello and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency requirements. This project will begin in the summer of 2017 and be substantially completed by late fall 2017. 2.0 LOCATION This project is located between 3801 and 3936 Chelsea Road West in the City of Monticello. This site is within 1 mile of a segment of the Mississippi River that is considered Scenic and Recreational. All requirements of Appendix A of the NPDES General Permit apply to this site. 3.0 SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES The order of construction activities for the project will be as follows: Install perimeter silt fence. 2. Construct stabilized construction entrance. 3. Clear and grub trees. 4. Strip topsoil and rough grade site. 5. Install storm sewer and Stormtech Underground Infiltration System. 6. Final grade site. 7. Install class 5 aggregate and bituminous for the parking lot. Fertilize and sod disturbed areas as shown on the plans. Page 1 of 11 8. Remove silt fence and any other erosion control devices after final stabilization. 4.0 SITE CONSIDERATIONS 4.1 Areas of Concern: a) Generation of dust. b) Tracking onto existing roads. c) Washouts around perimeter of parking lot. d) Discharge into surface waters. 5.0 CONTROL MEASURES 5.1 Areas of Concern: a) Generation of dust: i) Dust control may become necessary. Water trucks may be required if dust control is needed. b) Tracking onto existing roads: i) Construction site entrances/exits must be inspected for evidence of sediment tracking onto paved surfaces. Tracked sediment shall be removed from paved surfaces within 24 hours. c) Washouts around perimeter of parking lot: i) Temporary erosion protection or permanent cover around the parking lot shall be installed within 7 days of completion of grading. d) Discharge to surface waters: i) Any temporary or permanent ditch or swale that drains water from any portion of the construction site must be stabilized within 200 lineal feet from the property edge or from the point of discharge into any surface water. Stabilization of the last 200 lineal feet must be completed within 24 hours after connecting to a surface water. 5.2 Standard Control Measures a) Stabilized Construction Entrance — A stabilized construction entrance shall be constructed at the proposed entrance and exit points for all construction vehicles. Details for allowable stabilized construction entrances are shown on the plans. b) Silt Fence — Silt fence is designed as a temporary sediment barrier consisting of a filter fabric attached to support posts. The silt fence detail is shown on the plans. Page 2 of 11 c) Finished Grade Slopes — The site will be graded with 1:4 slopes or flatter. The flatter slopes will provide a less erosive surface. All disturbed areas, as shown on the construction plans, will be covered with fertilizer and sod. The site grading plan is included in Appendix A. d) Restoration — All exposed soil areas must be stabilized immediately to limit soil erosion but in no case later than 7 days after the construction activity in that portion of the site has temporarily or permanently cease. All disturbed areas, unless otherwise noted on the plans, require topsoil, fertilizer and sod. The type and application rates for seed and fertilizer are shown on the plans. Temporary seeding and Type 1 disc anchored mulch may be required based on contractor's operations. Temporary seed mix is shown on the plans. e) Inlet Protection — All inlets shall be protected until the site has stabilized. Inlet protection details are shown on the plans. f) Temporary Stockpiles — All site stockpiles must have silt fence or other effective sediment controls, and cannot be placed in any natural buffers or surface waters, including stormwater conveyances such as curb and gutter systems or conduits and ditches unless there is a bypass inplace for this stormwater. g) Horizontal Cat Tracking — Horizontal Cat Tracking shall be utilized on slopes as a Best Management Practice (BMP). 6.0 OTHER POTENTIAL STORMWATER POLLUTANTS Potential pollutant sources, including construction and waste materials, used or stored at the site are described in this section. By implementation of these BMPs these potential pollutant sources are not reasonably expected to affect the stormwater discharges from the site. a) Storage, Handling, and Disposal of Construction Products, Materials, and Wastes: The Permittee(s) shall comply with the following to minimize the exposure to stormwater of any of the products, materials, or wastes. Products or wastes which are either not a source of contamination to stormwater or are designed to be exposed to stormwater are not held to this requirement: Building products that have the potential to leach pollutants must be under cover (e.g., plastic sheeting or temporary roofs) to prevent the Page 3 of 11 discharge of pollutants or protected by a similarly effective means designed to minimize contact with stormwater. ii. Pesticides, herbicides, insecticides, fertilizers, treatment chemicals, and landscape materials must be under cover (e.g., plastic sheeting or temporary roofs) to prevent the discharge of pollutants or protected by similarly effective means designed to minimize contact with stormwater. iii. Hazardous materials, toxic waste, (including oil, diesel fuel, gasoline, hydraulic fluids, paint solvents, petroleum-based products, wood preservatives, additives, curing compounds, and acids) must be properly stored in sealed containers to prevent spills, leaks or other discharge. Restricted access storage areas must be provided to prevent vandalism. Storage and disposal of hazardous waste or hazardous materials must be in compliance with Minn. R. ch. 7045 including secondary containment as applicable. iv. Solid waste must be stored, collected and disposed of properly in compliance with Minn. R. ch. 7035. V. Portable toilets must be positioned so that they are secure and will not be tipped or knocked over. Sanitary waste must be disposed of properly in accordance with Minn. R. ch. 7041. b) Fueling and Maintenance of Equipment or Vehicles; Spill Prevention and Response: The Permittee(s) shall take reasonable steps to prevent the discharge of spilled or leaked chemicals, including fuel, from any area where chemicals or fuel will be loaded or unloaded including the use of drip pans or absorbents unless infeasible. The Permittee(s) must conduct fueling in a contained area unless infeasible. The Permittee(s) must ensure adequate supplies are available tall times to clean up discharged materials and that an appropriate disposal method is available for recovered spilled materials. The Permittee(s) must report and clean up spills immediately as required by Minn. Stat. § 115.061, using dry clean up measures where possible. c) Vehicle and equipment washing: If the Permittee(s) wash the exterior of vehicles or equipment on the project site, washing must be limited to a defined area of the site. Runoff from the washing area must be contained in a sediment basin or other similarly effective controls and waste from the washing activity must be properly disposed of. The Permittee(s) must properly use and store soaps, detergents, or solvents. No engine degreasing is allowed on site. Page 4 of l 1 d) Concrete and other washout waste: The Permittee(s) must provide effective containment for all liquid and solid wastes generated by washout operations (concrete, stucco, paint, form release oils, curing compounds and other construction materials) related to the construction activity. The liquid and solid washout wastes must not contact the ground, and the containment must be designed so that it does not result in runoff from the washout operations or areas. Liquid and solid wastes must be disposed of properly and in compliance with MPCA rules. A sign must be installed adjacent to each washout facility that requires site personnel to utilize the proper facilities for disposal of concrete and other washout wastes. 7.0 EROSION CONTROL INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE a) The Permittee(s) must ensure that a trained person (as identified in Part III.A.3.a.) will routinely inspect the entire construction site at least once every seven (7) days during active construction and within 24 hours after a rainfall event greater than 0.5 inches in 24 hours. Following an inspection that occurs within 24 hours after a rainfall event, the next inspection must be conducted within seven (7) days after the rainfall event. b) All inspections and maintenance conducted during construction must be recorded within 24 hours in writing and these records must be retained with the SWPPP in accordance with Part III.E. Records of each inspection and maintenance activity shall include: i. Date and time of inspections. ii. Name of person(s) conducting inspections. iii. Findings of inspections, including the specific location where corrective actions are needed. iv. Corrective actions taken (including dates, times, and party completing maintenance activities). V. Date and amount of all rainfall events greater than 1/2 inch (0.5 inches) in 24 hours. Rainfall amounts must be obtained by a properly maintained rain gauge installed onsite, a weather station that is within 1 mile of your location or a weather reporting system that provides site specific rainfall data from radar summaries. vi. If any discharge is observed to be occurring during the inspection, a record of all points of the property from which there is a discharge must be made, and the discharge should be described (i.e., color, odor, floating, settled, or suspended solids, foam, oil sheen, and other obvious indicators of pollutants) and photographed. Page 5 of l 1 vii. Any amendments to the SWPPP proposed as a result of the inspection must be documented as required in Part III.B. within seven (7) calendar days. c) Inspection frequency adjustment i. Where parts of the project site have permanent cover, but work remains on other parts of the site, the Permittee(s) may reduce inspections of the areas with permanent cover to once per month. ii. Where construction sites have permanent cover on all exposed soil areas and no construction activity is occurring anywhere on the site, the site must be inspected during non -frozen ground conditions at least once per month for a period of twelve (12) months. Following the twelfth month of permanent cover and no construction activity, inspections may be terminated until construction activity is once again initiated unless the Permittee(s) is/are notified in writing by the MPCA that erosion issues have been detected at the site and inspections need to resume. iii. Where work has been suspended due to frozen ground conditions, the inspections may be suspended. The required inspections and maintenance schedule must begin within 24 hours after runoff occurs at the site or 24 hours prior to resuming construction, whichever comes first. d) The Permittee(s) is/are responsible for the inspection and maintenance of temporary and permanent water quality management BMPs, as well as all erosion prevention and sediment control BMPs, until another Permittee has obtained coverage under this Permit according to Part II.B.5. or the project has undergone Final Stabilization, and a NOT has been submitted to the MPCA. e) The Permittee(s) must inspect all erosion prevention and sediment control BMPs and Pollution Prevention Management Measures to ensure integrity and effectiveness during all routine and post -rainfall event inspections. All nonfunctional BMPs must be repaired, replaced, or supplemented with functional BMPs by the end of the next business day after discovery, or as soon as field conditions allow access unless another time frame is specified below. The Permittee(s) must investigate and comply with the following inspection and maintenance requirements: i. All perimeter control devices must be repaired, replaced, or supplemented when they become nonfunctional or the sediment Page 6 of l 1 reaches one-half (1/2) of the height of the device. These repairs must be made by the end of the next business day after discovery, or thereafter as soon as field conditions allow access. ii. Temporary and permanent sedimentation basins must be drained and the sediment removed when the depth of sediment collected in the basin reaches one-half (1/2) the storage volume. Drainage and removal must be completed within 72 hours of discovery, or as soon as field conditions allow access (see Part IV.D.). iii. Surface waters, including drainage ditches and conveyance systems, must be inspected for evidence of erosion and sediment deposition during each inspection. The Permittee(s) must remove all deltas and sediment deposited in surface waters, including drainage ways, catch basins, and other drainage systems, and restabilize the areas where sediment removal results in exposed soil. The removal and stabilization must take place within seven (7) days of discovery unless precluded by legal, regulatory, or physical access constraints. The Permittee(s)• hall use all reasonable efforts to obtain access. If precluded, removal and stabilization must take place within seven (7) calendar days of obtaining access. The Permittee(s) is/are responsible for contacting all local, regional, state and federal authorities and receiving any applicable permits, prior to conducting any work in surface waters. iv. Construction site vehicle exit locations must be inspected for evidence of off-site sediment tracking onto paved surfaces. Tracked sediment must be removed from all paved surfaces both on and off site within 24 hours of discovery, or if applicable, within a shorter time to comply with Part IV.C.6. V. Streets and other areas adjacent to the project must be inspected for evidence of off-site accumulations of sediment. If sediment is present, it must be removed in a manner and at a frequency sufficient to minimize off-site impacts (e.g., fugitive sediment in streets could be washed into storm sewers by the next rain and/or pose a safety hazard to users of public streets). f) All infiltration areas must be inspected to ensure that no sediment from ongoing construction activity is reaching the infiltration area. All infiltration areas must be inspected to ensure that equipment is not being driven across the infiltration area. Page 7ofII 8.0 DEWATERING AND BASIN DRAINING All water from dewatering or basin draining activities must be discharged in a manner that does not cause nuisance conditions, erosion in receiving channels or on downstream properties, or inundation in wetlands causing significant adverse impact to the wetland. The contractor shall be responsible for obtaining any permits required for the dewatering activities. 9.0 FINAL STABILIZATION The Contractor must ensure Final Stabilization of the site. Final Stabilization is not complete until all the following requirements are complete: a) All soil disturbing activities at the site have been completed and all soils are stabilized by a uniform perennial vegetative cover with a density of 70 percent of its expected final growth density over the entire pervious surface area, or other equivalent means necessary to prevent soil failure under erosive conditions. b) The permanent stormwater management system is constructed, meets all requirements in Part IIID of the General Permit and is operating as designed. Temporary or permanent sedimentation basins that are to be used as permanent water quality management basins have been cleaned of any accumulated sediment. All sediment has been removed from conveyance systems including rip rap and ditches are stabilized with permanent cover. C) All temporary synthetic and structural erosion prevention and sediment control BMPs (such as silt fence) have been removed on the portions of the site for which the Permittee(s) is/are responsible. BMPs designed to decompose on site (such as compost logs) may be left in place. d) The Contactor shall submit the Notice of Termination to the MPCA once final stabilization is complete. 10.0 PLAN AMENDMENTS The SWPPP will be amended if there is a change in design, construction, operation, maintenance, weather or seasonal conditions that has a significant impact on the discharge to surface waters or underground waters. The Plan will also be amended if it is proven to be inadequate in controlling pollutants in stormwater discharges due to construction activities. 11.0 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT Figure 1 shows the proposed drainage areas. An effort has been made to account for all stormwater both entering and leaving the site. Most of the site's runoff will be collected Page 8 of 11 and treated in the Stormtech Underground Infiltration System. Stormwater will drain from the parking lot to the infiltration system. Those areas where stormwater cannot be collected by any of the systems listed above shall have the necessary temporary measures employed to reduce the risk of erosion and sediment contamination until permanent vegetative cover can be established. Great care shall be taken during the construction of the infiltration system to protect the area from erosion and sediment. Diversion berms or other devices shall be used to keep runoff and sediment away from the infiltration area. Heavy equipment will not be allowed in the infiltration area. All work shall be performed with low pressure track type equipment. 12.0 NON-STORMWATER MANAGEMENT Non-stormwater discharges will be eliminated or reduced to the extent feasible, with the exception to those necessary for the completion of certain construction activities. Authorized non-stormwater discharges from this site include: a) Water used for dust control purposes. b) Uncontaminated groundwater or spring water. c) Uncontaminated excavation dewatering. d) Pumping of detention basins or de -silting basins after rain events (using proper filtering devices per the General Permit Requirements). e) Street Cleaning (where permitted). These authorized non-stormwater discharges will be conducted in accordance with the requirement of the NPDES Phase 2 permit, and every effort will be made to minimize non- stormwater runoff from these site activities. Non-stormwater discharges will be directed to treatment ponds whenever possible. 13.0 CONSTRUCTION CHEMICAL AND POLLUTANTS 13.1 SPILL PREVENTION The following are the material management practices that will be used to reduce the risk of spills or other accidental exposure of materials and substances to stormwater runoff: a) An effort will be made to store only enough product to do the required job. b) All materials stored on site shall be stored in a neat and orderly manner. C) All products shall be kept in their original container, with the original labels still attached, unless the containers are not re -sealable. Page 9 of l 1 d) Substances shall not be mixed with one another unless recommended by the manufacturer. e) Whenever possible, all of a product shall be used up before disposing of the container. f) Manufacturer's recommendations for proper disposal shall be followed. g) The site superintendent will routinely inspect the site to ensure proper disposal of all on site materials. Fertilizers: Fertilizers shall be applied only in minimum amounts as recommended by the manufacturer. Once applied, the fertilizer will be worked into the soil to limit the exposure to transient surface waters. Paints: All containers will be tightly sealed and stored when not required for use. Excess paint shall be properly disposed of in accordance with local regulations. Concrete Trucks: Concrete trucks (all construction equipment) will only be allowed to wash out in designated discharge areas. Product Specific Practices — Petroleum Products: All onsite vehicles and equipment will be monitored for leaks and receive regular preventative maintenance to reduce the chance of leakage. Petroleum products will be stored in a tightly sealed container, which is clearly labeled. Any asphalt substances used onsite will be applied according to the manufacturer's recommendations. 13.2 SPILL CONTROL PRACTICES Spill Control Practices — a) All spills will be cleaned up immediately after discovery, in accordance with the manufacturer's recommended methods. b) The spill area will be kept well ventilated. C) Spills of toxic or hazardous materials will be reported to the appropriate agencies. d) A log of the spill type, location, date and time will be created by the job superintendent. The spill prevention plan will be adjusted to include measures to prevent this type of spill from occurring. Page 10 of 11 14.0 HOUSEKEEPING BMP'S a) Vehicle and equipment maintenance and repair activities at the site shall be performed in designated control areas. b) Solid materials, including building materials, garbage and debris shall be cleaned up daily and properly disposed of to prevent the discharge of these materials to surface waters or to storm drains. c) Equipment washout areas shall be provided on site. Equipment wash water shall be controlled to prevent unauthorized dry weather discharges and to avoid mixing with stormwater. d) Construction materials and chemicals used or stored on-site shall be kept in small quantities whenever possible. When not in use, they shall be stored in sealed containers and under cover to prevent direct contact with stormwater. Any inadvertent spills shall be cleaned up immediately upon discovery and the materials will be disposed of in accordance with local, state and federal requirements. e) Vehicle fueling shall be conducted in a location away from access to surface waters whenever practicable. On-site fuel storage tanks other than approved portable fuel containers such as gasoline cans, shall have a means of secondary containment and shall be located, whenever practicable, undercover. Any inadvertent spills shall be cleaned up immediately upon discovery and the materials will be disposed of in accordance with local, state and federal requirements. f) Portable toilets shall be provided onsite. g) Strips of mature vegetation shall be preserved whenever possible. h) Clearing and grubbing material shall be chipped up and used for erosion control whenever possible. 15.0 SEED MIXES The site will be sodded as shown on the plans. 16. LONG TERM MAINTENANCE Camping World and Good Sam is responsible for the long term maintenance of the stormwater collection and treatment system for this project. Page 11 of 11 FIGURES DATE 1 , 95500 1 �'• / �/. RQ=95496 IRIE 95011 / 95310 GN I I 1 I RE -9 23) E(N) 94882 1 I IRE5)8948.]] (PLUGGED) 1 \(N) RE - 52 i4\\ �\\ 1 IE(5J-96860 I \ 1 J I REVISION i ;z5� STA r, H/GHI,yAy 4 C� I I T i I ISI I I i II I I III ( I I V 955 _ _-� P1 m P2 ------___ -956 I V\ \ I V \ I I I V I I I Hakanson Anderson --]1] Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors 3601 Thurston Ave., Anoka, Minnesota 55303 763-427-5860 FAX 763-427-0520 www.hakanson—anderson.com I I I ice\ I 1 / CAMPING WORLD EAST PARKING LOT EXPANSION LEGEND 0SUBCATCHMENT NUMBER DRAINAGE BOUNDARY DRAINAGE ARROW 1 40 0 40 80 SCALE IN FEET FIGURE 1 DRAINAGE AREAS PROPOSED CONDITIONS 3395.05 APPENDIX A Construction Plans \ i\ a 4" 1 ----• -- - _________ }_________ _________ii_________ _ ________1as�u s T` — - � 1 _ _____{*�' % ______, \ I ------ - - I --------a5]---------------- - Ilii / ----------------------------------- a5>_\ \\ ` _ --------ass----------- I I-------------------- -------- 5 -------------------' — _ ------------85------� SAWCUT ANDI REMOIWE CONCRETE 1\ i E.O.F. \ i CURB j \ 955.7 \ i \ p 1 \ --- 'sa N I-------------- kl� • •1,\` ,_�J X11 \ \ \ \ � m \ �--_-_, II I aso i / "� DRAINAGE AND �.'ol UTILITY EASEMENT --- _ \ ,; --�- - (TYP.) -- m\p, I REMOVE U 11 BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (TYP.) IL k vt SAWCUT--------------- BITUMINOUS \ kt t+` \ 5' BI I 1 ,,, \ PAV (MENj --------------- TYP.) >. O, 855_______ 9 Ez\st\n g II ' A50o I`\- ='--___ M B' z'___ / r _ _____-----i� `= E `,a9•,� o ;9, � ro-„w- —A-„ III✓'�S" "� r 95 ' M5 = II `fen - - F i i JY uc� CLEA AND" cae - � R_ - - 1 - - '4 l > ," _________-- _______ A L" -_______ _ GRAB TREE " '- ----`- --------_`______________ ____ _ _ __ ______________eee__eee_ a"--=----=-----_------ ---------------- - 36 a _ 3e AQP s R _ X63 - ,-95 CHELSEA ROAD iE (S)-94845 ems_ 9 oe5 c`g { IE (e)-9-3 «"^: -ass_, I as� (8�-`` - > > > siate > es> > > > IE (w/E)-942.73 d - -V-- > hbaxV� SAWCUT AND REMOVE I,�_e�e,. 0 CONCRETE CURB o d a, DATE 4 7/17 REVISION PLAN REVISIONS PER CIN REVIEW I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report wasDESIGNED prepared by me or under my direct supervi on and that l BY: I TAE Hakanson Anderson o c N 4 2fi 17 PLAN REVISIONS PER CLIENT REVIEW m a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws CAMPING WORLD EAST °) of al 6 15 17 7/7/17 7/18/17 PLAN REVISIONS PER CLIENT REVIEW PLAN REVISIONS PER CLIENT REVIEW REVISED TOTAL SHEETS of the State of Mi ta. //�� ��e p / .�f f DRAMN BY: I TAE Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors 3601 Thurston Ave., Anoka, Minnesota 55303 763-427-5860 FAX 763-427-0520 PARKING LOT EXPANSION % Y 61M r j'(A((71ryT A. (,I S „k61 vate 3/6/17 Lic. No. 43362 CHE[%FD BY. I CJJ WWW .hakanson-anderson.com GENERAL NOTES: 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE REMOVAL OF UTILITIES AND LIGHTING AS NEEDED. 30 0 \ 30 60 i SCALE IN FEET EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY SHEET AND REMOVALS PLAN �� OF C$ CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA SHEETS 3395.05 PROPOSED FLAG POLE GL= GL=957.77 - - - - .-.-.-. _ - - - - - _ - - _ - - - Xv` GEN 955.38 t (END CURB) ---- _ ___ _ ___ _ _ f/ __-- \`p --- 5 --------# --- - --------------- ----- ----- ---# ----_ -v au -----\---------0 06 _ PROPOSED BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT PER C3 GL- 1 954.72 \ µr GL=957.70 ILII / _ ♦'//////,I PROPOSED TIPOUT CURB PER e s ery i jGL=954.05 `) 1 ` (BEGIN CURB) (MATCH -- -___________________________ss,_____________ __ __-- I EXISTING) - _ -_ ss> dil, \ e ________________ � T� � SILT FENCE PER 2 °� C3 m GL -956.87 _____--- -- --------------------- - GL=954.39 \ _ -- _ _ _ _ __/ 11 I 11i0\ m 5 - - _--_- ---------ass- -- GL`N' DRAINAGE ARROW 1 GL=1 - GL=956.18 g5 1,� = �I 'S' ' 1 GL= --g5 956.24 _ _ 1 8' � 1111 � 1 \ 953.861 gsa.o6 - _ GL= PROPOSED GUTTER LINE ELEVATION - _ _ _ - 908.55 k GL=953.42 1 A BIT= Sv, - (MATCH.- 1 STORMTECH SC -740 1 1 GL=956.43 1 \ / E.O.F. ;_ �� 908.55 PROPOSED BITUMINOUS ELEVATION 1 1 EXISTING N� GL= GL=957.14 1 95g (END CURB) 1 \ )I GL=955.28 956.33 CHAMBER SYSTEM. SEE 11 \ �\ 956.5 ; >I 11 A 11 A SHEETS C5-C7 FOR DETAILS. Y! \ .I __- I ., I •%•o x , i�• �� � � \` \ \ \\ i9R. � 9B5e) 1 I IIC„ \ "' I � I 955 Q,, A •� . • •) ss is II 74 •• B „ SS __ ,o 100 - BIT= 1 \� 955 3 956.70 HW = _ 1,, A , .•= 1 \, 95418 _ A / E.O.F. BIT 955.3 /12 /v ` BIT .14 \ \ \ l �ss0^' BIT= �� cN, 1 GENERAL NOTES: 954.35 ,% 11 100 -YEAR �sss� se e,o 956.39 11 A q sa es / 1 1. PRIOR TO IMPORTING OR EXPORTING MATERIAL FROM THE SITE, Cv HWL=955.3 CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT A STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION u an 9y6 e* ;,1 ENTRANCE PER CITY STANDARD PLATE 6002 OR 6003. \ 1p 2. -- DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE STABILIZED WITHIN 7 DAYS OF an --- `� BIT= - �;��1 ROUGH GRADING. -�----- _ BI 3. INSTALL INLET PROTECTION DEVICES PER C3 AND KOAT ALL CATCH BASINS THAT MAY RECEIVE STORMWATER RUNOFF FROM THE SITE. G 4. STREET SWEEPING MUST BE PERFORMED DAILY IF SEDIMENT IS TRACKED OUTSIDE THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS OR ONTO ANY CITY STREETS. 5. THE CONTRACTOR MUST STABILIZE ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREAS \ \ l \ (INCLUDING STOCKPILES). STABILIZATION MUST BE INITIATED IMMEDIATELY TO LIMIT SOIL EROSION WHENEVER ANY v EzIsCm9 \ Iq,, \ I CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY HAS PERMANENTLY OR TEMPORARILY CEASED ON ANY PORTION OF THE SITE AND WILL NOT RESUME BIT= \ �' `I ti\ FOR A PERIOD EXCEEDING SEVEN CALENDAR DAYS. STABILIZATION T MUS 957.14 BE COMPLETED NO LATER THAN SEVEN CALENDAR DAYS AFTER THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IN THAT PORTION OF THE 1{j 1 E�"jasNs' I II I';;1, 1 1 \q3 1 yt I SITE HAS TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED. TEMPORARY t 1 1 I \L\ 1 v BEa9 .95d90 1 q,, 1 I 1 fttt7 1 v • E\ 1 \ q,, 1 1 SEEDING INFORMATION AND APPLICATION RATES ARE TABULATED 11 y1 �� 1V ON SHEET C4. GL=956.42,1 6. SEE SHEET C5 FOR STORM SEWER INFORMATION. 1 1 m / q, I 1 7. SEE SHEET L1 FOR LANDSCAPE PLAN. 354LF w `` - J\ �q', I 8. SEE SHEET C8 FOR THE SANITARY SEWER DUMP STATION AND \; 1 B612 CONCRETE CURB ORNAMENTAL B \ SIGN LOCATIONS. tp \ \;t` ; 18" RCP (CL III) \ \ FENCE \ i I U,, AND GUTTER PER MN/DOT ®0.37% _ q\ \ REFERENCE NOTES: ----- I a 1 ' STANDARD PLATE 7100 \ ' I --------------- ------ q Q LOCATION AND INVERT OF EXISTING STORM SEWER STUB SHALL I BE VERIFIED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. A MANHOLE MAY BE 9 , ,I p ase__----_ u; 11 NECESSARY IF THE ANGLE OF THE PIPE HAS TO BE REVISED. _ 1 95 1 1 S 1 �\ i � „\I IB \' ,-� I1 gp\\d1r\9 i I \ \ t1l 11 li z -� T�,� 1 ` STABILIZED Ex\sCm9 B' 4 1 a CONSTRUCTION + MANUAL \ \ A \\ROLLING , li1 ORNAMENTAL ENTRANCE Q CONNECT TO I � lav o \1�1FENCE ,.p"aPaO = ROLLING GATE INV=94 NTALEXISTING Ea9501 GATE\ MANUAL STORM SEWER 1 GBEGINBCURB 8.90 1O ' ORNAME / _--'°•seMaa - o-'_=`_"` " II' \ 1 ( ) 1 FENCE 1 \I O�Matm' E 'J -J�«m -o-o-o o-o-o-o-o-yXT-owt_-a-o-o-o o-o-o�>=oj iil✓ p 1--------, 44- I 1 a ePs` ce z3�� - o � m - San MH \ \_ fen a Poat IR, -_--' -'" - - _ i \s - t------ - `� - -- __ _ �__ ___ -__ _ -__ -= '_--_______ ----- - ----------------------------------- �~ " F ' as 0 EE -95988 a - 8 _ "��» 3G• R P CHELSEA ROAD (Si -948 '<a es 0 RCP ' e� E`i oaa 1 h /E) -le �E cal=a.a.95 --- - ass- _ 1=h-& , - ' -lY-' y ' > foa'so� > >� > -'> > > > > > \\ p > > > $ IE (w/E)=aaz.>a 30 0 30 60 E ) /I_ R 8618 CONCRiETE CURB AND 9" NF ��c:sass.oe -� �..fr ,.a SCALE IN FEET 8 GUTTER PER MN/DOT1 " STANDARD PLATE 7100 0 d DATE REVISION I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report wa oEslckko er: GRADING DRAINAGE AND SHEET a, 4 7 17 PLAN REVISIONS PER CIN REVIEW prepared by me or under my direct supery on and that sl I TAE Hakanson Anderson c 4126/17 PLAN REVISIONS PER CLIENT REVIEW m a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws C'1 6/15 17 PLAN REVISIONS PER CLIENT REVIEW am the State of Mi ta. okAMNBY: Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors CAMPING WORLD EAST EROSION CONTROL PLAN of aI 7 //17 PLAN REVISIONS PER CLIENT REVIEW �(�jyy J I TAE 3601 Thurston Ave., Anoka, Minnesota 55303 PARKING LOT EXPANSION OF 7�1H/17 PLAN REVISIONS PER CITY REVIEW - IIMOf�iY A. p'� 1 y CHE[%FO BY: 763-427-5860 FAX 763-427-0520 C8 Date 3/6/17 W Lic. No. 43362 I CJJ www. hakanson-anderson.com CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA SHEETS Y 3395.05 GENERAL CONSTRUCTION AND SOILS NOTES: 1. CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 2016 EDITION OF THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION". 2. UNLESS OTHERWISE RECOMMENDED IN THESE PLANS, THE GRADING SUBGRADE SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF SUITABLE GRADING MATERIAL. THE FILL SHALL BE PLACED IN 8" TO 10" LOOSE LIFTS, AND COMPACTED TO 100% OF THE STANDARD PROCTOR MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY. 3. SUITABLE GRADING MATERIAL FOR THIS PROJECT SHALL CONSIST OF ALL SOILS ENCOUNTERED WITH THE EXCEPTION OF TOPSOIL, SILT, DEBRIS, ORGANIC MATERIAL AND OTHER UNSTABLE MATERIAL. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW THE "REPORT OF GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION AND REVIEW" PREPARED BY AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. AND DATED MARCH 2, 2017 FOR ADDITIONAL SITE PREPARATION REQUIREMENTS. 5. PROVIDE A SAW CUT WHEN PLACING NEW PAVEMENT ADJACENT TO INPLACE PAVEMENT AND AT TERMINI OF CONSTRUCTION TO ENSURE A UNIFORM JOINT. 6. BITUMINOUS AND CONCRETE ITEMS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH MN/DOT SPEC. 2104.3. 7. USE TACK COAT BETWEEN ALL BITUMINOUS MIXTURES. THE BITUMINOUS TACK COAT MATERIAL SHALL BE APPLIED AT A UNIFORM RATE OF 0.05 GAL/SY TO 0.07 GAL/SY BETWEEN BITUMINOUS LAYERS. THE APPLICATION RATES ARE FOR UNDILUTED EMULSIONS. 8. PERFORMANCE GRADED (PG) ASPHALT BINDER PG 58S-28, SPEC. 3151, SHALL BE USED FOR ALL BITUMINOUS MIXES ON THIS PROJECT. SPECIFIC PG GRADES SHALL BE LISTED AT THE END OF THE MIX DESIGNATION NUMBER SHOWN ON THE TYPICAL SECTION. 9. THE BITUMINOUS MIXTURES SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF SPECIFICATIONS 2360 AND 3139. 10. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE RESTORED WITH 4" OF TOPSOIL AND SOD. GENERAL EROSION CONTROL NOTES: 1. EROSION CONTROL SHALL CONFORM TO THE MN/DOT EROSION CONTROL HANDBOOK. 2. PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ACQUIRE THE NECESSARY MPCA NPDES STORMWATER PERMIT. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL FACILITIES (BMP'S) PRIOR TO GRADING AND REMOVAL ACTIVITIES. BMP'S SHALL BE MAINTAINED FOR THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AND POTENTIAL FOR EROSION HAS PASSED. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SCHEDULE HIS OPERATION TO MINIMIZE THE AMOUNT OF DISTURBED AREA AT ANY GIVEN TIME. 5. BMP'S SHALL BE INSPECTED DAILY BY THE CONTRACTOR. OBSERVATIONS SHALL BE RECORDED IN THE INSPECTION LOG. 6. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE PROPERLY DISPOSED OF WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS AFTER FINAL SITE STABILIZATION. 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FILE A NOTICE OF TERMINATION WITH THE MPCA AFTER FINAL STABILIZATION HAS BEEN APPROVED. REFERENCE NOTES: 10 TYPE 1 INLET PROTECTION SHALL BE INSTALLED AS NECESSARY TO MINIMIZE PONDING OF WATER DURING CONSTRUCTION. �2 TYPE 2 INLET PROTECTION SHALL BE INSTALLED ON ALL CASTINGS RECEIVING RUNOFF FROM THE PROJECT AREA. o' Ej a~ U N � O a. DATE 6/ 175 117 7//17 o a 7 1 /17 n Y ijP SOIL BORING 2" TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (SPWEA240B) w��ii�iJ%�%�%I%i�ililBITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT �2 TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (SPWEB240B) 10" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE, 100% CRUSHED K\XXX\XXX\XXX PLACED ON APPROVED SUBGRADE OBITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SECTION C3 NO SCALE 3.63"1 LEGEND fN T 1 -------952-------- EXISTING CONTOUR PLASTIC ZIP TIES (SOLE TENSILE) 952 PROPOSED CONTOUR SIDE SEDIMENT CONTROL BARRIER FRAME PROPERTY LINE -GEOTEXTILE FABRIC, 36" WIDTH - - - DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT LINE G GAS MAIN P -OH OVERHEAD ELECTRIC MACHINE SLICE 8"-12" P -BUR BURIED ELECTRIC DEPTH T -BUR BURIED TELEPHONE FO -BUR BURIED FIBER OPTIC MACHINE SLICED -----------------------= EXISTING CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER > EXISTING SANITARY SEWER » EXISTING STORM SEWER SEWER o+ EXISTING WATERMAIN -�o 0 EXISTING UTILITY POLE 0 EXISTING UTILITY PEDESTAL 0 EXISTING LIGHT POLE w EXISTING HYDRANT X EXISTING WATERMAIN VALVE O EXISTING STORM SEWER MANHOLE n UE ® EXISTING CATCH BASIN j OO EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE 3 EXISTING SIGN i EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE PROPOSED CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER >> PROPOSED STORM SEWER SEWER M j -DETAIL NUMBER w a 3 SHEET NUMBER e' o' Ej a~ U N � O a. DATE 6/ 175 117 7//17 o a 7 1 /17 n Y ijP SOIL BORING 2" TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (SPWEA240B) w��ii�iJ%�%�%I%i�ililBITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT �2 TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (SPWEB240B) 10" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE, 100% CRUSHED K\XXX\XXX\XXX PLACED ON APPROVED SUBGRADE OBITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SECTION C3 NO SCALE 2 SILT FENCE DETAILS C3 TO PROTECT AREAS FROM SHEET FLOW (SEE SPEC. 3886) A O A �s-,p• a Q PIAN couex r cam" tx II mm s<1 �s" 6 e IEr. .2 -ON g - e Es M P Pws 11 BASE M I Pr u B oB SECTION I PINE m BE EauiEo WERE aE.s 6muxeoNw sr.,as µwe "Pu"ieLFOaoa°F. B sp M' sr x�Bs A z, boa o oPa«c.%E a Bxc sN u BE " nue: Manhole Standard Plate Library Catch Basin City of Monticello Dote: 03-05 Plate No. - - R11: 03-17 4003 949.75 8612 CONCRETE CURB �6"� AND GUTTER PER MN/DOT STANDARD PLATE 7100 a 6.00% i a M 6"I~I 7 1N.TAK B612 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER PER MN/DOT STANDARD PLATE 7100 O 1.50% M `n 8.12" J TIPOUT� OCONCRETE CURB DETAILS C3 NO SCALE V 60" DIA. MANHOLE - -951.50 24" CPP HEADER ROW 15" CPP TO CHAMBERS -6- CONCRETE 6"CONCRETE WEIR C340 CONCRETE WEIR DETAIL 34.12__.d 3.63"1 POST LENGTH, 5 FT. MIN. fN T 1 6.375" � f 5.691" II �AT 6 FT. MAX. SPACING PLASTIC ZIP TIES (SOLE TENSILE) TAB LOCATED IN TOP 8" SIDE SEDIMENT CONTROL BARRIER FRAME DIRECTION OF -GEOTEXTILE FABRIC, 36" WIDTH r RUNOFF FLOW z_z - 0 w MACHINE SLICE 8"-12" N F DEPTH N O C,_ STANDARD MACHINE SLICED 2 SILT FENCE DETAILS C3 TO PROTECT AREAS FROM SHEET FLOW (SEE SPEC. 3886) A O A �s-,p• a Q PIAN couex r cam" tx II mm s<1 �s" 6 e IEr. .2 -ON g - e Es M P Pws 11 BASE M I Pr u B oB SECTION I PINE m BE EauiEo WERE aE.s 6muxeoNw sr.,as µwe "Pu"ieLFOaoa°F. B sp M' sr x�Bs A z, boa o oPa«c.%E a Bxc sN u BE " nue: Manhole Standard Plate Library Catch Basin City of Monticello Dote: 03-05 Plate No. - - R11: 03-17 4003 949.75 8612 CONCRETE CURB �6"� AND GUTTER PER MN/DOT STANDARD PLATE 7100 a 6.00% i a M 6"I~I 7 1N.TAK B612 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER PER MN/DOT STANDARD PLATE 7100 O 1.50% M `n 8.12" J TIPOUT� OCONCRETE CURB DETAILS C3 NO SCALE V 60" DIA. MANHOLE - -951.50 24" CPP HEADER ROW 15" CPP TO CHAMBERS -6- CONCRETE 6"CONCRETE WEIR C340 CONCRETE WEIR DETAIL 34.12__.d -949.75 I I HDPE F_17.63"moi EMERGENCY OPEN BOTH SIDE.1 OVERFLOW JSILT FABRIC SLEEVE %� PER MNDOT SPECIFICATION 3886 o�2" DIAMETER ® o . . . o HOLES 1 SEDIMENT CONTROL BARRIER FRAME OSTORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION TYPE 1 10 `.3 PRE -CURB -945.75 2X3 HDPE FRAME INSERT 00 pppp pppp pp�p on�p EMERGENCY OVERFLOW PORTS HDPE INSERT BASKETS SHOWN WITHOUT FILTER BAGS. 400 MICRON FILTER BAGS REQUIRED INSIDE BASKETS. CURB OSTORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION TYPE 2 (2 C3 POST -CURB REVISION I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report wa DESIGNED BY: DETAILS %1IMS PLAN REVISIONS PER CIN REVIEW prepared by me or under my direct supery on and thafsl Hakanson Anderson PLAN REVISIONS PER CLIENT REVIEW m a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws TAE REVISED DETAIL 7/C3 of the state otta. oLibcNo. I DRAImBY: Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors CAMPING WORLD EAST PIAN REVISIONS PER CITY REVIEW �(rYYf TAE 3601 Thurston Ave., Anoka, Minnesota 55303 PARKING LOT EXPANSION OF I(Mp(A1 A. �'(�j(I cNEaEDN: 763-427-5860 FAX 763-427-0520 Date 316/17 W 43362 I CJJ www.hakanson-anderson.com CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA 3395.05 3.63"1 ,ti a fN T 1 6.375" � f 5.691" II y N TOP VIEW ,� SLOT FOR LOCKING TAB I IEW SIDE SEDIMENT CONTROL BARRIER FRAME -949.75 I I HDPE F_17.63"moi EMERGENCY OPEN BOTH SIDE.1 OVERFLOW JSILT FABRIC SLEEVE %� PER MNDOT SPECIFICATION 3886 o�2" DIAMETER ® o . . . o HOLES 1 SEDIMENT CONTROL BARRIER FRAME OSTORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION TYPE 1 10 `.3 PRE -CURB -945.75 2X3 HDPE FRAME INSERT 00 pppp pppp pp�p on�p EMERGENCY OVERFLOW PORTS HDPE INSERT BASKETS SHOWN WITHOUT FILTER BAGS. 400 MICRON FILTER BAGS REQUIRED INSIDE BASKETS. CURB OSTORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION TYPE 2 (2 C3 POST -CURB REVISION I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report wa DESIGNED BY: DETAILS %1IMS PLAN REVISIONS PER CIN REVIEW prepared by me or under my direct supery on and thafsl Hakanson Anderson PLAN REVISIONS PER CLIENT REVIEW m a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws TAE REVISED DETAIL 7/C3 of the state otta. oLibcNo. I DRAImBY: Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors CAMPING WORLD EAST PIAN REVISIONS PER CITY REVIEW �(rYYf TAE 3601 Thurston Ave., Anoka, Minnesota 55303 PARKING LOT EXPANSION OF I(Mp(A1 A. �'(�j(I cNEaEDN: 763-427-5860 FAX 763-427-0520 Date 316/17 W 43362 I CJJ www.hakanson-anderson.com CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA 3395.05 Gravel pad(s) MaDOT Class CA -15 or CA -25 Riprap Bedding - Geotextile fabric grade°I +++111 SECTION 8-13 (not to scale) Rlbbed or Corrugated steel plates Original Gs.tsAile fabric SECTION A -A grade (not to scale) NOTES, trapping aa runoff to sediment Sediment Trapping Device trappingping device e A Ribbed or Corrugated steel plates y Al� A IS z � E I 3 � B x Slope away from ! 24 m w / highway Mulch 5d min Eor Rght of Way xisting Grade PLAN Trde: Commercial Gravel Standard Plate Library Construction Entrance City of Monticello Dace: 06-14 Plate N. Revised: 03— 6002 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL QUANTITIES MN/DOT APPLICATION APPROXIMATE ITEM SPECIFICATION RATE QUANTITY SODTYPELAWN 3878 N/A 27005QYD FERTILIZER TYPE I 3881 300 LBS/ACRE 167 LBS STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION 2573 N/A 8EACH 5I LT FENCE 3886 N/A 1.604 LIN FT STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 2573 N/A 1EACH GENERAL NOTES: 1. MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW ALL DUMP STATION SEPARATION DISTANCES AND DIMENSIONS AND REVISE AS NEEDED TO MEET ALL CODES. 3 REFERENCE NOTES: a 1) SIGN A SHALL BE PART #DUMPSTATIONSIGN AS PROVIDED BY WILDFLOWER MEADOWS, LLC (DBA RVPARKSUPPLIES.COM), F VANCOUVER, WASHINGTON OR APPROVED EQUAL. 0 02 DUMP STATION LID SHALL BE PART #METALDUMPSTATIONLID o AS PROVIDED BY WILDFLOWER MEADOWS, LLC (DBA RVPARKSUPPLIES.COM), VANCOUVER, WASHINGTON OR n APPROVED EQUAL. Q3 WATER TOWER SHALL BE PART #DUMPSTATIONWATER AS 3 PROVIDED BY WILDFLOWER MEADOWS, LLC i (DBA RVPARKSUPPLIES.COM), VANCOUVER, WASHINGTON OR o APPROVED EQUAL. ® CONTRACTOR SHALL SAWCUT EXISTING PAVEMENT AS "I REQUIRED TO INSTALL DUMP STATION. PATCH BITUMINOUS i TO MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT AND GRAVEL BASE SECTIONS. (3) MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR SHALL HARD PLUMB YARD > HYDRANT TO WATER TOWER. ALL PLUMBING SHALL BE IN a ACCORDANCE WITH ALL CODES. E N © MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL A BALL VALVE AT THE LOW POINT TO FACILITATE DRAINING OF THE WATER TOWER AFTER EACH USE DURING FREEZING TEMPERATURES. 0 a. DATE REVISION o a, 7/18/17 ADDED SHEET N � N 0 � Y msrlmm � Cua ucrnr srrc STN1IIE11 STYtIQ � ur s*wl>ti fii�B110r t:bsnNc �� '�'�aaswe:4� Ntn. mwt m Tnl .r sr tu: {2W tivCm. W ]g Ia TM "D D W vIT" IP]NCI W &TN S wlee:c*oMss UMreMe m tut W WpK,w llrR%A -ITS. ITEM Cr CT0 . CTto WE1aM\ v rw .rte. ewr srur Standard Plate Library City of Monticello IT� Mad Mat Entrance Dotty06--14 Plate No. 1:06-14 5003 i #6'• (4) 1/2"X12" GALVANIZED J -BOLTS, • • EMBED 10" J a 16" DIAMETER CONCRETE FOOTING — (4) 1/2"X12" WATER—_ GALVANIZED J -BOLTS TOWER EMBED 10" BASE AND SES SCREW - i I I I BITUMINOUS " PAVEMENT � J 16" DIAMETER a a a CONCRETE FOOTING OWATER TOWER FOUNDATION C4 TOWER I TO WATER DRAIN © SUPPLY TOWER DRAINFROST PROOF SUMP-NEENAH — YARD HYDRANT(5) R -2565-A CASTING./ \ AIR MAINTAIN caAPII S IGN A(!) SEE . WATER TOWER (3 TER TOWER FOUNDATION. SEE C4 Z in— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 4" STEEL BOLLARD IN 12" DIA. — — CONCRETE FOOTING. EPDXY COAT -4 n STEEL -SAFETY YELLOW J pm ° m c4 5L°OPE SLDPE rowTO LID 27" DIAMETER MANWAY I I DUCTILE IRON DUMP STATION LID ° WITH FOOT PEDAL CAST INTO SLAB 02 ° ° An I e �° � I W J 7" CONCRETE m J o PAD N4 -- I L— — — — — — — — — — ----------------- L 2,000 GALLON PLAN VIEW SEPTIC TANK BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT(j) 8.3% 8.3% i J 7, 4" SCHEDULE 80 PVC MALE J ° L7" CONCRETE ADAPTOR (SCREW X SOLVENT/// PAD SLIP WELD 6" (3 LAYERS) 4" SCHEDULE 80I a POLYSTYRENE PVC PIPE INSULATION 4" FERNCO BALL COUPLING AIR GAP --,,-,,,,,, VALVE n = TO WATER I I TOWER it �T f _ _ I 2' MIN. (ALL EDGES) NEENAH 10 n R -2565-A CASTING. ?,6 1 I _--24" CPP v ° C4 1 1/2„ 0 0 ROCK OTOWER DRAIN SUMP C4 l� 4" SCHEDULE 80 PVC RISER CAST INTO COVER NEENAH R-1733 FRAME WITH SOLID COVER. COVER SHALL HAVE TWO C.I. LIFT HANDLES, 1/4" POLYISOPRENE GASKET AND THE WORDS "SANITARY SEWER". (2) 2" CONCRETE�� - ADJUSTING RINGS 27" DIA. CONCRETE___V1 PIPE RISER PER MN/DOT STANDARD PLATE 4006 PROFILE VIEW C4C DUMP STATION DETAIL 2,000 GALLON PRECAST CONCRETE SEPTIC TANK I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report wa DESIGNED BY: DETAILS %11EE1S prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that was Hakanson Anderson ofa duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws TAE the State of Mi ta. NNexrer: civil Engineers and Land Surveyors CAMPING WORLD EAST OF `��ry°yr, I TAE 3601 Thurston Ave., 0 Anoka, Minnesota 55303 PARKING LOT EXPANSION (�j p A. t; l 5 cNEceto Nr: 763-427-5860 FAX 763-427-0520 Date 3/6/17 Lic. No. 43362 I CJJ www.hakanson—anderson.com CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA 3395.05 s 24" CPP HEADER_ ROW WITH 10" CPP STUBS TO CHAMBERS (7 TOTAL STUBS) CB/MH #1 Q 60" DIA. (R-3246) FL=954.35 (N,S,E)INV=949.75 SUMP=945.75 4LF 24" CPP ® 0.00% CB/MH #2. 48" DIA. (R-3246) FL=954.41 (N,S,E)INV=949.75 SUMP=945.75 4LF 24" CPP-/ ® 0.00% CB/MH #3 48" DIA. (R-3246) FL=954.47 (N,E)INV=949.75 SUMP=945.75 274.2' ADS 315ST WOVEN ADS 315STABR WOVEN GEOTEXTILE FABRIC OVER EDGE OF 18" CPP HEADER FOUNDATION STONE FOR INFILTRATION 52' GEOTEXTILE FABRIC OVER SCOUR PROTECTION AREA 10" INSPECTION 3 2 ROW WITH 8" CPP FOUNDATION STONE FOR PORT PER C5 STUBS TO CHAMBERS SCOUR PROTECTION - - - - - - - - - (TYP.) CS (14 TOTAL STUBS - - - - - - - - IFI I I I I I I I I I I I IMI I I I I I I I I I I� I I I I III I I I I I I I I I II�II I I I I I I I I I I � IIDII � I I 1 1 1 I � I I I I I I IMI I��II I I I III I I I I I I I I I IIDII I I I I � I I I I IMI I I I III I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 IMI I I I I I I I I I I � IMI S I C III I I � I I I I I IMI � I I I I I I I I I I IIDII I I I 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I IMI I I 15" CPP STUB FROM MANHOLE TO CHAMBER PROPOSED B612 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER GENERAL NOTES: 1. ALL STORM SEWER STRUCTURES SHALL BE PRECAST CONCRETE SECTIONS PER MN/DOT STANDARD PLATE 4020 AND 4022. STRUCTURES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED PER CITY STANDARD PLATE 4003. REFERENCE NOTES: 10 PLACE GEOSYNTHETIC FABRIC ON THE TOP AND ON ALL SIDES OF THE ANGULAR STONE. DO NOT PLACE FABRIC UNDER THE ANGULAR STONE. 02 SEE SHEETS C5 AND C6 FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES AND DETAILS FOR THE STORMTECH CHAMBER. (3) STRUCTURE SHALL INCLUDE A 6" CONCRETE WEIR PERr4 3 � I 0 0 v~i I CLEAN, CRUSHED, ANGULAR STONE a w 0 N O N M i 30 i 12" - - I STORMTECH SC -740 CHAMBER (TYP.)-\ 51 APPROVED (TYP.) SUBGRADE CHAMBERS PLACED 57" ON CENTER (6" BETWEEN CHAMBERS) STORMTECH SC -740 CHAMBER (TYP.) ADS GEOSYNTHETICS 601T NON -WOVEN GEOTEXTILE FABRIC ,1 l� 20 0 10 20 SCALE IN FEET 1 C5 STORMTECH J SC -740 END CAP (TYP.) CHAMBER SYSTEM PLAN VIEW 02 ASTM/MH #4 48" DIA. (R-1733) RIM=955.73 RCP (N)INV=949.75 OUTLET PIPE (S)INV=950.22 CONCRETE COLLAR 'III PA\/FMFNT - I PARKING LOT CONCRETE SLAB IF SECTION 8" (200 mm) MIN THICKNESS VARIES 52.75 X952.25 - 949.75 -949.00 CHAMBERS PLACED 69" ON CENTER 12" (18" BETWEEN CHAMBERS) QCHAMBER SYSTEM CROSS SECTION 02 FLEXSTORM CATCH IT PART#6215NYFX WITH USE OF OPEN GRATE 10" (250 mm) INSERTA TEE PART# 1OP35STIP INSERTA TEE TO BE CENTERED ON CORRUGATION CREST 15" CPP STUB FROM MANHOLE TO CHAMBER 18" (450 mm) MIN WIDTH -�24" CPP HEADER ROW WITH 10" CPP STUBS TO CHAMBERS (7 TOTAL STUBS) CB/MH #5 Q 60" DIA. (R -3360-A) RIM=954.38 (N,S,W)INV=949.75 SUMP=945.75 4LF 24" CPP ® 0.00% CB/MH #6 48" DIA. (R -3360-A) RIM=954.28 (N,S,W)INV=949.75 SUMP=945.75 4LF 24" CPP ® 0.00% CB/MH #7 48" DIA. (R -3360-A) RIM=954.18 (N,S)INV=949.75 SUMP=945.75 CONCRETE COLLAR NOT REQUIRED FOR UNPAVED APPLICATIONS 15" (375 mm) NYLOPLAST INLINE DRAIN BODY W/SOLID HINGED COVER OR GRATE PART# 2715AG101P SOLID COVER: 1599CGC GRATE: 1599CGS 10" (250 mm) SDR35 PIPE SC -740 CHAMBER Q SC-740 10" INSPECTION PORT DETAIL hereby terrify that this plan, specification or report wa oEslcelo �: STORMTECH SC -740 CHAMBER SYSTEM XIIEUS prepared by me or under my direct supervision one law sl Hakanson Anderson a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws TAE am the State of Mi +a. pgp�llgy; civil Engineers and Land Surveyors CAMPING WORLD EAST DETAILS J I TAE 3601 Thurston Ave., Anoka, Minnesota 55303 PARKING LOT EXPANSION 11t6iMY A, s cN[a[oa: 763-427-5860 FAX 763-427-0520 vote 3�6�17i&f Lic. No. 43362 I CJJ WWW. hakanson-anderson.com CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA 3395.05 M i w a o- E j V) � U N � O a DATE REVISION o a, 6/15/17 ADDED SHEET N 7/1 /17 PLAN REVISIONS PER CITY REVIEW of al 0 � Y STORMTECH SC -740 CHAMBER (TYP.)-\ 51 APPROVED (TYP.) SUBGRADE CHAMBERS PLACED 57" ON CENTER (6" BETWEEN CHAMBERS) STORMTECH SC -740 CHAMBER (TYP.) ADS GEOSYNTHETICS 601T NON -WOVEN GEOTEXTILE FABRIC ,1 l� 20 0 10 20 SCALE IN FEET 1 C5 STORMTECH J SC -740 END CAP (TYP.) CHAMBER SYSTEM PLAN VIEW 02 ASTM/MH #4 48" DIA. (R-1733) RIM=955.73 RCP (N)INV=949.75 OUTLET PIPE (S)INV=950.22 CONCRETE COLLAR 'III PA\/FMFNT - I PARKING LOT CONCRETE SLAB IF SECTION 8" (200 mm) MIN THICKNESS VARIES 52.75 X952.25 - 949.75 -949.00 CHAMBERS PLACED 69" ON CENTER 12" (18" BETWEEN CHAMBERS) QCHAMBER SYSTEM CROSS SECTION 02 FLEXSTORM CATCH IT PART#6215NYFX WITH USE OF OPEN GRATE 10" (250 mm) INSERTA TEE PART# 1OP35STIP INSERTA TEE TO BE CENTERED ON CORRUGATION CREST 15" CPP STUB FROM MANHOLE TO CHAMBER 18" (450 mm) MIN WIDTH -�24" CPP HEADER ROW WITH 10" CPP STUBS TO CHAMBERS (7 TOTAL STUBS) CB/MH #5 Q 60" DIA. (R -3360-A) RIM=954.38 (N,S,W)INV=949.75 SUMP=945.75 4LF 24" CPP ® 0.00% CB/MH #6 48" DIA. (R -3360-A) RIM=954.28 (N,S,W)INV=949.75 SUMP=945.75 4LF 24" CPP ® 0.00% CB/MH #7 48" DIA. (R -3360-A) RIM=954.18 (N,S)INV=949.75 SUMP=945.75 CONCRETE COLLAR NOT REQUIRED FOR UNPAVED APPLICATIONS 15" (375 mm) NYLOPLAST INLINE DRAIN BODY W/SOLID HINGED COVER OR GRATE PART# 2715AG101P SOLID COVER: 1599CGC GRATE: 1599CGS 10" (250 mm) SDR35 PIPE SC -740 CHAMBER Q SC-740 10" INSPECTION PORT DETAIL hereby terrify that this plan, specification or report wa oEslcelo �: STORMTECH SC -740 CHAMBER SYSTEM XIIEUS prepared by me or under my direct supervision one law sl Hakanson Anderson a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws TAE am the State of Mi +a. pgp�llgy; civil Engineers and Land Surveyors CAMPING WORLD EAST DETAILS J I TAE 3601 Thurston Ave., Anoka, Minnesota 55303 PARKING LOT EXPANSION 11t6iMY A, s cN[a[oa: 763-427-5860 FAX 763-427-0520 vote 3�6�17i&f Lic. No. 43362 I CJJ WWW. hakanson-anderson.com CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA 3395.05 ACCEPTABLE FILL MATERIALS: STORMTECH SC -740 CHAMBER SYSTEMS PLEASE NOTE: 1. THE LISTED AASHTO DESIGNATIONS ARE FOR GRADATIONS ONLY. THE STONE MUST ALSO BE CLEAN, CRUSHED, ANGULAR. FOR EXAMPLE, A SPECIFICATION FOR #4 STONE WOULD STATE: "CLEAN, CRUSHED, ANGULAR NO. 4 (AASHTO M43) STONE". 2. STORMTECH COMPACTION REQUIREMENTS ARE MET FORA' LOCATION MATERIALS WHEN PLACED AND COMPACTED IN 6" (150 mm) (MAX) LIFTS USING TWO FULL COVERAGES WITH A VIBRATORY COMPACTOR. 3. WHERE INFILTRATION SURFACES MAY BE COMPROMISED BY COMPACTION, FOR STANDARD DESIGN LOAD CONDITIONS, A FLAT SURFACE MAY BE ACHIEVED BY RAKING OR DRAGGING WITHOUT COMPACTION EQUIPMENT. FOR SPECIAL LOAD DESIGNS, CONTACT STORMTECH FOR COMPACTION REQUIREMENTS. PERIMETER STONE (SEE NOTE 6) EXCAVATION WALL (CAN BE SLOPED OR VERTICAL) ADS GEOSYNTHETICS 601T NON -WOVEN GEOTEXTILE ALL AROUND CLEAN, CRUSHED, ANGULAR STONE IN A & B LAYERS 12" (300 mm) MIN - f SC -740 END CAP 0; 0 III III=III=fII=III=III-III-III= 11I 11I 11I 111 111 111 I I I I: II� III=III=III=III=III-III-I - I 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 I,, ,III: i 1I 1 11 I I =1 I IJ I I- I 1 1i i � SUBGRADE SOILS (SEE NOTE 4) PAVEMENT LAYER (DESIGNED BY SITE DESIGN ENGINEER) TO BOTTOM OF FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT. FOR UNPAVED INSTALLATIONS WHERE RUTTING FROM VEHICLES MAY OCCUR, I f C') I1//--// 1 I��_// / 1I E (150 m INCREASE COVER TO 24"(600 p 6" (150 mm) MIN 30" (760 mm) NOTES: 1. SC -740 CHAMBERS SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM F2418 "STANDARD SPECIFICATION FOR POLYPROPYLENE (PP) CORRUGATED WALL STORMWATER COLLECTION CHAMBERS", OR ASTM F2922 "STANDARD SPECIFICATION FOR POLYETHYLENE (PE) CORRUGATED WALL STORMWATER COLLECTION CHAMBERS". 2. SC -740 CHAMBERS SHALL BE DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM F2787 "STANDARD PRACTICE FOR STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF THERMOPLASTIC CORRUGATED WALL STORMWATER COLLECTION CHAMBERS". 3. "ACCEPTABLE FILL MATERIALS" TABLE ABOVE PROVIDES MATERIAL LOCATIONS, DESCRIPTIONS, GRADATIONS, AND COMPACTION REQUIREMENTS FOR FOUNDATION, EMBEDMENT, AND FILL MATERIALS. 4. THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ASSESSING THE BEARING RESISTANCE (ALLOWABLE BEARING CAPACITY) OF THE SUBGRADE SOILS AND THE DEPTH OF FOUNDATION STONE WITH CONSIDERATION FOR THE RANGE OF EXPECTED SOIL MOISTURE CONDITIONS. 5. PERIMETER STONE MUST BE EXTENDED HORIZONTALLY TO THE EXCAVATION WALL FOR BOTH VERTICAL AND SLOPED EXCAVATION WALLS. 6. ONCE LAYER'C' IS PLACED, ANY SOIL/MATERIAL CAN BE PLACED IN LAYER'D' UP TO THE FINISHED GRADE. MOST PAVEMENT SUBBASE SOILS CAN BE USED TO REPLACE THE MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS OF LAYER'C' OR'D' AT THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER'S DISCRETION. 1 8, 18" (2.4 m) (450 mm) MIN` MAX I L DEPTH OF STONE TO BE DETERMINED BY SITE DESIGN ENGINEER 6" (150 mm) MIN 12" (300 mm) TYP z 0 0 W U) U) o (q ti 0 0 U U Q Q' a z H U) z O H a L) W ILL 0 D z W U ILL 0 L) v 80 0, J 04 m� M z �_ M V IL n 0 M FQn O J O J O V 2 �z SHEET C6 OF C8 AASHTO MATERIAL COMPACTION / DENSITY MATERIAL LOCATION DESCRIPTION CLASSIFICATIONS REQUIREMENT FINAL FILL: FILL MATERIAL FOR LAYER'D' STARTS FROM THE TOP OF THE'C' LAYER TO THE BOTTOM ANY SOIL/ROCK MATERIALS, NATIVE SOILS, OR PER PREPARE PER SITE DESIGN ENGINEER'S PLANS. D OF FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT OR UNPAVED FINISHED ENGINEER'S PLANS. CHECK PLANS FOR PAVEMENT N/A PAVED INSTALLATIONS MAY HAVE STRINGENT GRADE ABOVE. NOTE THAT PAVEMENT SUBBASE SUBGRADE REQUIREMENTS. MATERIAL AND PREPARATION REQUIREMENTS. MAY BE PART OF THE'D' LAYER BEGIN COMPACTIONS AFTER 12" (300 mm) OF AASHTO M145' MATERIAL OVER THE CHAMBERS IS REACHED. INITIAL FILL: FILL MATERIAL FOR LAYER'C' GRANULAR WELL -GRADED SOIL/AGGREGATE MIXTURES, <35% A-1, A-2-4, A-3 COMPACT ADDITIONAL LAYERS IN 6" (150 mm) MAX STARTS FROM THE TOP OF THE EMBEDMENT FINES OR PROCESSED AGGREGATE. LIFTS TO A MIN. 95% PROCTOR DENSITY FOR C STONE ('B' LAYER) TO 18" (450 mm) ABOVE THE OR WELL GRADED MATERIAL AND 95% RELATIVE TOP OF THE CHAMBER. NOTE THAT PAVEMENT MOST PAVEMENT SUBBASE MATERIALS CAN BE USED IN LIEU AASHTO M43' DENSITY FOR PROCESSED AGGREGATE SUBBASE MAY BE A PART OF THE 'C' LAYER. OF THIS LAYER. 3, 357, 4, 467, 5, 56, 57, 6, 67, 68, 7, 78, 8, 89, MATERIALS. ROLLER GROSS VEHICLE WEIGHT 9,10 NOT TO EXCEED 12,000 lbs (53 kN). DYNAMIC FORCE NOT TO EXCEED 20,000 lbs (89 kN). EMBEDMENT STONE: FILL SURROUNDING THE AASHTO M43' B CHAMBERS FROM THE FOUNDATION STONE ('A' CLEAN, CRUSHED, ANGULAR STONE NO COMPACTION REQUIRED. LAYER) TO THE 'C' LAYER ABOVE. 3, 357, 4, 467, 5, 56, 57 FOUNDATION STONE: FILL BELOW CHAMBERS AASHTO M43' PLATE COMPACT OR ROLL TO ACHIEVE A FLAT A FROM THE SUBGRADE UP TO THE FOOT (BOTTOM) CLEAN, CRUSHED, ANGULAR STONE 3, 357, 4, 467, 5, 56, 57 SURFACE. 2' OF THE CHAMBER. PLEASE NOTE: 1. THE LISTED AASHTO DESIGNATIONS ARE FOR GRADATIONS ONLY. THE STONE MUST ALSO BE CLEAN, CRUSHED, ANGULAR. FOR EXAMPLE, A SPECIFICATION FOR #4 STONE WOULD STATE: "CLEAN, CRUSHED, ANGULAR NO. 4 (AASHTO M43) STONE". 2. STORMTECH COMPACTION REQUIREMENTS ARE MET FORA' LOCATION MATERIALS WHEN PLACED AND COMPACTED IN 6" (150 mm) (MAX) LIFTS USING TWO FULL COVERAGES WITH A VIBRATORY COMPACTOR. 3. WHERE INFILTRATION SURFACES MAY BE COMPROMISED BY COMPACTION, FOR STANDARD DESIGN LOAD CONDITIONS, A FLAT SURFACE MAY BE ACHIEVED BY RAKING OR DRAGGING WITHOUT COMPACTION EQUIPMENT. FOR SPECIAL LOAD DESIGNS, CONTACT STORMTECH FOR COMPACTION REQUIREMENTS. PERIMETER STONE (SEE NOTE 6) EXCAVATION WALL (CAN BE SLOPED OR VERTICAL) ADS GEOSYNTHETICS 601T NON -WOVEN GEOTEXTILE ALL AROUND CLEAN, CRUSHED, ANGULAR STONE IN A & B LAYERS 12" (300 mm) MIN - f SC -740 END CAP 0; 0 III III=III=fII=III=III-III-III= 11I 11I 11I 111 111 111 I I I I: II� III=III=III=III=III-III-I - I 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 I,, ,III: i 1I 1 11 I I =1 I IJ I I- I 1 1i i � SUBGRADE SOILS (SEE NOTE 4) PAVEMENT LAYER (DESIGNED BY SITE DESIGN ENGINEER) TO BOTTOM OF FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT. FOR UNPAVED INSTALLATIONS WHERE RUTTING FROM VEHICLES MAY OCCUR, I f C') I1//--// 1 I��_// / 1I E (150 m INCREASE COVER TO 24"(600 p 6" (150 mm) MIN 30" (760 mm) NOTES: 1. SC -740 CHAMBERS SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM F2418 "STANDARD SPECIFICATION FOR POLYPROPYLENE (PP) CORRUGATED WALL STORMWATER COLLECTION CHAMBERS", OR ASTM F2922 "STANDARD SPECIFICATION FOR POLYETHYLENE (PE) CORRUGATED WALL STORMWATER COLLECTION CHAMBERS". 2. SC -740 CHAMBERS SHALL BE DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM F2787 "STANDARD PRACTICE FOR STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF THERMOPLASTIC CORRUGATED WALL STORMWATER COLLECTION CHAMBERS". 3. "ACCEPTABLE FILL MATERIALS" TABLE ABOVE PROVIDES MATERIAL LOCATIONS, DESCRIPTIONS, GRADATIONS, AND COMPACTION REQUIREMENTS FOR FOUNDATION, EMBEDMENT, AND FILL MATERIALS. 4. THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ASSESSING THE BEARING RESISTANCE (ALLOWABLE BEARING CAPACITY) OF THE SUBGRADE SOILS AND THE DEPTH OF FOUNDATION STONE WITH CONSIDERATION FOR THE RANGE OF EXPECTED SOIL MOISTURE CONDITIONS. 5. PERIMETER STONE MUST BE EXTENDED HORIZONTALLY TO THE EXCAVATION WALL FOR BOTH VERTICAL AND SLOPED EXCAVATION WALLS. 6. ONCE LAYER'C' IS PLACED, ANY SOIL/MATERIAL CAN BE PLACED IN LAYER'D' UP TO THE FINISHED GRADE. MOST PAVEMENT SUBBASE SOILS CAN BE USED TO REPLACE THE MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS OF LAYER'C' OR'D' AT THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER'S DISCRETION. 1 8, 18" (2.4 m) (450 mm) MIN` MAX I L DEPTH OF STONE TO BE DETERMINED BY SITE DESIGN ENGINEER 6" (150 mm) MIN 12" (300 mm) TYP z 0 0 W U) U) o (q ti 0 0 U U Q Q' a z H U) z O H a L) W ILL 0 D z W U ILL 0 L) v 80 0, J 04 m� M z �_ M V IL n 0 M FQn O J O J O V 2 �z SHEET C6 OF C8 COVER ENTIRE ISOLATOR ROW WITH ADS GEOSYNTHETICS 601T NON -WOVEN GEOTEXTILE 8'(2.4 m) MIN WIDE STORMTECH HIGHLY RECOMMENDS FLEXSTORM PURE INSERTS IN ANY UPSTREAM STRUCTURES WITH OPEN GRATES u\\ u CATCH BASIN I^ OR MANHOLE SC -740 CHAMBER SUMP DEPTH TBD BY SITE DESIGN ENGINEER (24" [600 mm] MIN RECOMMENDED) 724" (600 mm) HDPE ACCESS PIPE REQUIRED USE FACTORY PRE -FABRICATED END CAP PART #: SC740EPE24B INSPECTION & MAINTENANCE STEP 1) INSPECT ISOLATOR ROW FOR SEDIMENT OPTIONAL INSPECTION PORT SC -740 ISOLATOR ROW DETAIL NTS A. INSPECTION PORTS (IF PRESENT) A.1. REMOVE/OPEN LID ON NYLOPLAST INLINE DRAIN A.2. REMOVE AND CLEAN FLEXSTORM FILTER IF INSTALLED A.3. USING A FLASHLIGHT AND STADIA ROD, MEASURE DEPTH OF SEDIMENT AND RECORD ON MAINTENANCE LOG A.4. LOWER A CAMERA INTO ISOLATOR ROW FOR VISUAL INSPECTION OF SEDIMENT LEVELS (OPTIONAL) A.5. IF SEDIMENT IS AT, OR ABOVE, 3" (80 mm) PROCEED TO STEP 2. IF NOT, PROCEED TO STEP 3. B. ALL ISOLATOR ROWS B.1. REMOVE COVER FROM STRUCTURE AT UPSTREAM END OF ISOLATOR ROW B.2. USING A FLASHLIGHT, INSPECT DOWN THE ISOLATOR ROW THROUGH OUTLET PIPE i) MIRRORS ON POLES OR CAMERAS MAYBE USED TO AVOID A CONFINED SPACE ENTRY ii) FOLLOW OSHA REGULATIONS FOR CONFINED SPACE ENTRY IF ENTERING MANHOLE B.3. IF SEDIMENT IS AT, OR ABOVE, 3" (80 mm) PROCEED TO STEP 2. IF NOT, PROCEED TO STEP 3. STEP 2) CLEAN OUT ISOLATOR ROW USING THE JETVAC PROCESS A. A FIXED CULVERT CLEANING NOZZLE WITH REAR FACING SPREAD OF 45" (1.1 m) OR MORE IS PREFERRED B. APPLY MULTIPLE PASSES OF JETVAC UNTIL BACKFLUSH WATER IS CLEAN C. VACUUM STRUCTURE SUMP AS REQUIRED STEP 3) REPLACE ALL COVERS, GRATES, FILTERS, AND LIDS; RECORD OBSERVATIONS AND ACTIONS. STEP 4) INSPECT AND CLEAN BASINS AND MANHOLES UPSTREAM OF THE STORMTECH SYSTEM. NOTES 1. INSPECT EVERY 6 MONTHS DURING THE FIRST YEAR OF OPERATION. ADJUST THE INSPECTION INTERVAL BASED ON PREVIOUS OBSERVATIONS OF SEDIMENT ACCUMULATION AND HIGH WATER ELEVATIONS. 2. CONDUCT JETTING AND VACTORING ANNUALLY OR WHEN INSPECTION SHOWS THAT MAINTENANCE IS NECESSARY. SC -740 END CAP CS 315WTK WOVEN GEOTEXTILE BETWEEN FOUNDATION STONE AND CHAMBERS 5'(1.5 m) MIN WIDE CONTINUOUS FABRIC WITHOUT SEAMS CONCRETE COLLAR PAVEMENT I IIAA���rr�rr=�I�� CONCRETE SLAB 'rr``ri IIOq'r' II� \ �rioll 8" (200 mm) MIN THICKNESS 'rr- %II rr � FLEXSTORM CATCH IT PART# 6212NYFX WITH USE OF OPEN GRATE 6" (150 mm) INSERTA TEE PART# 6P26FBSTIP* INSERTA TEE TO BE CENTERED ON CORRUGATION CREST - 18" (450 mm) MIN WIDTH CONCRETE COLLAR NOT REQUIRED FOR UNPAVED APPLICATIONS 12" (300 mm) NYLOPLAST INLINE DRAIN BODY W/SOLID HINGED COVER OR GRATE PART# 2712AG61P* SOLID COVER: 1299CGC* GRATE: 1299CGS 6" (150 mm) SDR35 PIPE SC -740 CHAMBER * THE PART# 2712AG61PKIT CAN BE USED TO ORDER ALL NECESSARY COMPONENTS FOR A SOLID LID INSPECTION PORT INSTALLATION z O H a U U w 0 0, J N mM z M <=v won m M FQn C J O V J O co v=im �z SC -740 6" INSPECTION PORT DETAIL ~` NTS SHEET C7 OF C8 0 3 Z Q a I N O N 3 > I 50 0 50 100 E j USCALE IN FEET N � O a. DATE REVISION o a, 7/18/17 ADDED SHEET N � 15' MIN. 2,000 GALLON Tom"„-. - DUMP STATION #11� ros � i / I � III i � I 0 0 0 AGN \ REMOVE EXISTING FLAG POLE 0 15' MIN. 4 0 I PROPOSED FLAG POLE REFERENCE NOTES: iQ SEE SHEET C4 FOR ADDITIONAL DUMP STATION DETAILS. FINAL LOCATION OF DUMP STATION SHALL BE VERIFIED BY OWNER. l yT ERSTATf ylGyWAY 94 CAMPING WORLD EAST 15' MIN. —15' MIN. it 0 2,000 GALLON DUMP STATION #2 1Q I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report wa oEslceEo er: SITE PLAN XSIEEIS prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that sl Hakanson Anderson ofa duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws TAE71, the State of Mi ta. pppgy; civil Engineers and Land Surveyors CAMPING WORLD EAST %�(�Y"Yf I TAE 3601 Thurston Ave., Anoka, Minnesota 55303 PARKING LOT EXPANSION fIVA1 A. L'(J��j(1 y cx[a[oa: 763-427-5860 FAX 763-427-0520 Date 3/6/17 W Lic. No. 43362 I CJJ www.hakanson—anderson.com CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA 3395.05 a a Q 3 / � 1 m M M ' T w > o' Ea F30 0 30 60 M SCALE IN FEET O a. DATE REVISION N � N TAE "I" II: TAE 1111110 " CJJ REQUIRED PLANT MATERIALS 10 CALIPER INCHES OF TREES PER ACRE + 2 SHRUBS PER 10 L.F. OF BUILDING PERIMETER SITE AREA = 5.95 ACRES 10 X 5.95 = 59.2 CALIPER INCHES OF TREES REQUIRED 12 EXISTING TREES WITH 48 ACI TOTAL REQUIRED ADDITIONAL TREES = 11.5 ACI ADDITIONAL TREES PROVIDED = 6 = 12.0 ACI ACTUAL BUILDING PERIMETERS = 6958 L.F. = 1392 SHRUBS BLDG 1 = 276 L.F. BLDG 2 = 336 L.F. 276+336=612 10 = 61.2 X 2 = 122.4 SHRUBS REQUIRED 127 SHRUBS ROVIDED PLANT LIST: Site Plantings OTY. KEY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE/ROOT TREES 6 NP Pinus resinoso Norway Pine 6' B&B 6=12 ACI SHRUBS 11 HJ Juniperus horizontalis 'Hughes' Hughes Juniper 5 Gal. Pot 28 PS Panicum Argatum 'Shenandoah' Purple Foliage Switch Grass 3 Gal. Pat 48 EM Lonicera x xylosteum 'Emerald Mound' Emerald Mound Honeysuckle 5 Gal. Pot 40 MK Syringa patula 'Miss Kim' Miss Kim Lilac 5 Gal. Pot 127 PROVIDED (122 REQUIRED) PLANTING NOTES: Contractor shall provide one year guarantee of all plant materials. The guarantee begins on the date of the Landscape Architect's written acceptance of the Initial planting. Replacement plant materials shall also have a one year guarantee commencing upon planting. All plants to be northem—grown and hardy. Plants to be installed as per standard AAN planting practices. Use minimum 12" loam planting soll on trees and 6" on shrubs. Contractor shall verify locations with all utilili- prior to installation of plants. Irrigation shall be manually provided by the Owner. Contractor shall water all new plants until accepted by by the Owner Staking of trees optional; reposition if not plumb after one year. Wrap all smooth—barked trees—fasten top and bottom. Remove by April 1. Open top of burlap on Be materials; remove pot on potted plants; split and break apart peat pots. Prune plants as necessary — per standard nursery practice. Owner shall be responsible for maintenance after acceptance of the work by the Owner. Plants shall be immediately planted upon arrival at site. Properly heel—in materials if necessary. All disturbed areas to be sodded unless otherwise noted. Sod shall be northern grown and hardy. Planting beds for shrubs shall hove (4 oz. min.) weed barrier fabric, 4" — 5" of 1-1/2" washed Rivet Rock mulch and 4" vertical (cornmercial grade) black poly edging. The edging shall be placed and staked with smooth curves. Field adjust tree and shrub locations to fit uility locations and any changes that may have occured to the site plan and/or grading plan. Construction and soil types to be detemlined by the site Engineer. CONIFEROUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL Hakanson Anderson Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors 3601 Thurston Ave., Anoka, Minnesota 55303 763-427-5860 FAX 763-427-0520 --AH www.hakanson—anderson.com BRODSHO CONSULTING 698 NO BRIDGE COURT EAGAN. MN 55123 PHONE: 651-688-8023 FAX: 651-994-4792 ,�nen�a.5 oar tui""e:oia ° Debra Brodsho^/Z REG NO 23849 DATE 7-10-17 DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL CAMPING WORLD EAST PARKING LOT EXPANSION nen° L011E1 "" or conrAiuEsaz° uArtsiu (rn) AND H re SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL LANDSCAPE PLAN CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA SHEET L1 OF SHEETS 3395.05 APPENDIX B Design Certifications UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA Timothy Eggerichs Design of Construction SWPPP (May 31 2018) Erosion and Stormwater Management The bearer of this card has been tested and is certified in the area(s) shown on the reverse of this card. Certification expira- tion dates appear after each certification area. Sbri Ramaswamy, Head Department of Bioproducts and Biosystems Lngineering University of Minnesota http,,//www.erosion,umn.edu Card Issued: 6/1/2016 APPENDIX C General Permit Authorization to Discharge Stormwater Associated with Construction Activity Under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System/State Disposal System Program Page 1 of 35 Permit No: MN R100001 GENERAL PERMIT AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE STORMWATER ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM/ STATE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PROGRAM ISSUANCE DATE: August 1, 2013 EXPIRATION DATE: August 1, 2018 This permit is issued in compliance with the provisions of the Clean Water Act, as amended, (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.), 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 122, 123, 124,and 450 as amended; Minnesota Statute chapters 115 and 116, as amended, and Minn. R. chs. 7001, 7050, 7060 and 7090. This permit regulates discharges associated with stormwater affected by construction activity to waters of the state of Minnesota. This permit covers the stormwater discharges identified in Part I.A. of this permit. The limitations on permit coverage are identified in Part I.B. of this permit. Minn. R. 7090.2040 requires owner(s) of a construction activity to complete a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) prior to submitting an application for this permit and prior to conducting any construction activity. No person shall commence construction activity covered by Part I.A. until permit coverage under this permit is effective or, if applicable, until the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) has issued an individual National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)/State Disposal System (SDS) Construction Stormwater (CSW) Permit for the project. Unless notified by the MPCA to the contrary, applicants who submit a complete and accurate application (including permit fee) in accordance with the requirements of this permit are authorized to discharge stormwater associated with construction activity under the terms and conditions of this permit as described in Part II.B. Signature: �� �. Jo Linc Stine Commissioner If you have questions on this permit, including the specific permit requirements, permit reporting or permit compliance status, please contact the appropriate MPCA offices. Note that bolded words throughout the permit are defined in Appendix B. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Municipal Division Construction Stormwater Program 520 Lafayette Road North St. Paul, MN 55155-4194 Telephone: 651-296-6300 Toll free in MN: 800-657-3864 wq-strm2-68a TDD (for hearing and speech impaired only): (65/)282-5332 Page 2 of 34 Permit No: MN R100001 TABLE OF CONTENTS V. GENERAL PROVISIONS.................................................................................................. 24 A. Applicability Criteria................................................................................................... Page I. PERMIT COVERAGE AND LIMITATIONS............................................................................3 25 A. Permit Coverage........................................................................................................... 3 B. Limitations of Coverage................................................................................................ 3 II. SUBMITTING THE APPLICATION......................................................................................4 25 A. Prerequisite for Submitting a Permit Application........................................................ 4 B. Application and Duration of Coverage......................................................................... 5 C. Termination of Coverage.............................................................................................. 6 III. STORMWATER DISCHARGE DESIGN REQUIREMENTS.......................................................7 A. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Content........................................................... 7 B. SWPPP Amendments.................................................................................................. 10 C. Temporary Sediment Basins....................................................................................... 11 D. Permanent Stormwater Management System........................................................... 12 E. Record Retention........................................................................................................ 15 F. Training Requirements............................................................................................... 16 IV. CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY REQUIREMENTS................................................................... 16 A. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan....................................................................... 16 B. Erosion Prevention Practices...................................................................................... 17 C. Sediment Control Practices........................................................................................ 18 D. Dewatering and Basin Draining.................................................................................. 20 E. Inspections and Maintenance.................................................................................... 20 F. Pollution Prevention Management Measures........................................................... 22 G. Final Stabilization........................................................................................................ 24 V. GENERAL PROVISIONS.................................................................................................. 24 A. Applicability Criteria................................................................................................... 24 B. Record Availability...................................................................................................... 25 C. Prohibitions................................................................................................................ 25 D. Transfer of Ownership or Control.............................................................................. 25 E. Civil and Criminal Liability........................................................................................... 25 F. Severability.................................................................................................................25 G. NPDES/SDS Rule Standard General -Conditions......................................................... 26 H. Inspection and Entry................................................................................................... 26 APPENDIXA........................................................................................................................... 26 APPENDIX B - DEFINITIONS.................................................................................................... 31 wq-strm2-68a Page 3 of 34 Permit No: MN R100001 PART I. PERMIT COVERAGE AND LIMITATIONS I.A. PERMIT COVERAGE 1. This permit is required for construction activity that results in land disturbance of equal to or greater than one acre or a common plan of development or sale that disturbs greater than one acre, and authorizes, subject to the terms and conditions of this permit, the discharge of stormwater associated with construction activity. Construction activity does not include a disturbance to the land of less than five (5) acres for the purpose of routine maintenance that is performed to maintain the original line and grade, hydraulic capacity, or original purpose of the facility. Pavement rehabilitation that does not disturb the underlying soils (e.g., mill and overlay projects) is not considered construction activity. 2. This permit covers all areas of the State of Minnesota. 3. Coverage under this permit is not required when all stormwater from construction activity is routed directly to and treated by a "treatment works", as defined in Minn. Stat. § 115.01, subd. 21, that is operated under an individual NPDES/SDS permit with a Total Suspended Solids effluent limit for all treated runoff. 4. Previously Permitted Ongoing Projects: Permittee(s) of ongoing projects covered initially under the previous MPCA-issued NPDES/SDS Construction Stormwater General Permit (issuance date August 1, 2008) are granted coverage under this reissued permit. The Permittee(s) of those ongoing projects shall amend the SWPPP for the project to meet the requirements of this reissued permit no later than 18 months after the issuance date of this reissued permit if the termination -of -coverage requirements in Part II.C. will not be met within 18 months of the issuance date of this reissued permit and shall thereafter comply with this permit. However, additional permanent treatment required in this reissued permit is not required for previously permitted projects. If the previously permitted ongoing project will meet the termination -of -coverage requirements in Part II.C. within 18 months of the issuance date of this reissued permit, the Permittee(s) shall comply with the 2008 construction general permit until the project is complete and a Notice of Termination (NOT) consistent with Part II.C. of this reissued permit is submitted. C. If a previously permitted ongoing project will not be able to meet the terms and conditions of this reissued permit (other than the additional permanent treatment requirement) and will continue longer than 18 months after the issuance date of this permit, the Permittee(s) shall apply for an individual permit in accordance with Minn. R. ch. 7001. 1. B. LIMITATIONS OF COVERAGE This permit does not authorize discharges related to the following activities: 1. Discharges or releases that are not stormwater (except those non-stormwater discharges wq-strm2-68a Page 4 of 34 Permit No: N/N R100001 authorized under Part IV.D.). 2. The placement of fill into waters of the state requiring local, state or federal authorizations (such as U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Section 404 permits, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Public Waters Work Permits or Local Governmental Unit Wetland Conservation Act replacement plans or determinations). Discharges associated with industrial activity except for construction activity. Discharges associated with industrial activity may need to obtain coverage under a separate NPDES/SDS permit once day-to-day operational activities commence even if construction is ongoing. 4. Discharges from non -point source agricultural and silvicultural activities excluded from NPDES permit requirements under 40 CFR pt. 122.3(e). Discharges to the waters identified below unless the requirements of Appendix A are complied with: a. Discharges into outstanding resource value waters as listed in Minn. R. 7050.0180, subp. 3, 4, 5, 6, 6a and 6b. b. Discharges into trout waters as listed in Minn. R. 6264.0050, subp. 2 and 4. c. Discharges into wetlands as defined in Minn. R. 7050.0186 subd.la.B. d. Discharges from projects that have not completed applicable Environmental Review requirements under state or federal laws. e. Discharges that adversely impact or contribute to adverse impacts on a state or federally listed endangered or threatened species or adversely modify a designated critical habitat. f. Discharges that adversely affect properties listed or eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places or affecting known or discovered archeological sites. 6. Discharges to waters identified as impaired pursuant to section 303(d) of the federal Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. § 303(d)) where the identified pollutant(s) or stressor(s) are phosphorus (nutrient eutrophication biological indicators), turbidity, dissolved oxygen, or biotic impairment (fish bioassessment, aquatic plant bioassessment and aquatic macroinvertebrate bioassessment), and with or without a U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) approved Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) for any of these identified pollutant(s) or stressor(s), unless the applicable requirements of Part III.A.B. are met. PART II. SUBMITTING THE APPLICATION II.A. PREREQUISITE FOR SUBMITTING A PERMIT APPLICATION The owner must develop an accurate and complete SWPPP in accordance with Part III. (Stormwater Discharge Design Requirements) of this permit prior to submitting the application for coverage. The SWPPP is not required to be submitted to the MPCA (unless the project size is 50 acres or more and will discharge to certain waters as described in Part 11.13.1.b.) but is to be retained by the owner in wq-strm2-68a Page 5 of 34 Permit No: MN R100001 accordance with Part III.E. (Record Retention). The owner's failure to prepare an accurate and complete SWPPP prior to submitting the application is grounds for MPCA to revoke the permit. II.B. APPLICATION AND DURATION OF COVERAGE 1. Application Required. The owner and operator shall submit a complete and accurate on-line application form with the appropriate fee to the MPCA for each project that disturbs one (1) or more acres of land or for a common plan of development or sale that will ultimately disturb one (1) or more acres. If the applicant is not able to apply on-line, contact the MPCA for technical assistance or a waiver. b. For certain projects or common plans of development or sale disturbing 50 acres or more, the application must be submitted at least 30 days before the start of construction activity. This requirement pertains to projects that have a discharge point on the project that is within one mile (aerial radius measurement) of, and flows to, a special water listed in Appendix A, Part B. or waters listed as impaired under section 303(d) of the federal Clean Water Act (see the MPCA's website) where the identified pollutant(s) or stressor(s) are phosphorus (nutrient eutrophication biological indicators), turbidity, dissolved oxygen, or biotic impairment (fish bioassessment, aquatic plant bioassessment and aquatic macroinvertebrate bioassessment). Applicants of projects listed in this part must submit a complete and accurate application form and SWPPP including all calculations for the Permanent Stormwater Management System (see Parts IIIA. -D.). All persons meeting the definition of owner and operator are Permittees and must be listed on the application. The owner is responsible for compliance with all terms and conditions of this permit. The operator is responsible for compliance with Parts 11.13, II.C, 111.6-F, IV, V, and applicable construction activity requirements found in Appendix A, Part C. of this permit and is jointly responsible with the owner for compliance with those portions of the permit. Permit Coverage Effective Date: The commencement of any construction activity (e.g., land disturbing activities) covered under Part I.A. of this permit is prohibited until permit coverage under this permit is effective. a. For projects listed in Part 11.13.1.a. permit coverage will become effective seven (7) calendar days after the electronic submittal date or the postmarked date of a complete application form. For projects listed in Part II.B.1.b. permit coverage will become effective 30 calendar days after the electronic submittal date, the postmarked date or MPCA date stamp (whichever is first) of the complete application. For incomplete applications (e.g., lack of fees or signature) or incomplete SWPPPs (e.g., missing calculations, Best Management Practice (BMP) specifications, estimated quantities of the BMPs, or timing of BMP installation narrative), the permit becomes effective 30 calendar days after all required information is submitted. 4. Coverage Notification: Permittee(s) will be notified of coverage in a manner as determined by the Commissioner (e.g., e-mail, online notification or letter). wq-strm2-68a Page 6 of 34 Permit No: MN R100001 Change of Coverage: For construction projects where the owner or operator changes, (e.g., an original developer sells portions of the property to various homebuilders or sells the entire site to a new owner) the current owner and the new owner or operator shall submit a complete permit modification on a form provided by the Commissioner. The form must be submitted prior to the new owner or operator commencing construction activity on site or in no case later than 30 days after taking ownership of the property. The owner shall provide a SWPPP to the new owner and operator that specifically addresses the remaining construction activity. II.C. TERMINATION OF COVERAGE 1. Termination of coverage when construction is complete: All Permittee(s) must submit a Notice of Termination (NOT) to the MPCA on a form provided by the Commissioner within 30 days after all activities required for Final Stabilization (see Part IV.G.) are complete. The Permittee(s)' coverage under this permit terminates at midnight on the submission date of the NOT. Termination of coverage when transfer of ownership occurs: All Permittee(s) must submit a NOT on a form provided by the Commissioner within 30 days after selling or otherwise legally transferring the entire site, including permit responsibility for roads (e.g., street sweeping) and stormwater infrastructure final clean out, or transferring portions of a site to another party. The Permittee(s)' coverage under this permit terminates at midnight on the submission date of the NOT. Permittee(s) may terminate permit coverage prior to completion of all construction activity if all of the following conditions are met. After the permit is terminated under this Part, if there is any subsequent development on the remaining portions of the site where construction activity was not complete, new permit coverage must be obtained if the subsequent development itself or as part of the remaining common plan of development or sale will result in land disturbing activities of one (1) or more acres in size. a. Construction activity has ceased for at least 90 days. b. At least 90 percent (by area) of all originally proposed construction activity has been completed and permanent cover established on those areas. c. On areas where construction activity is not complete, permanent cover has been established. d. The site is in compliance with Part IV.G.2. and Part IV.G.3. and where applicable, Part IV.G.4. or Part IV.G.S. 4. Permittee(s) may terminate coverage upon approval by the MPCA if information is submitted to the MPCA documenting that termination is appropriate because the project is cancelled. PART III. STORMWATER DISCHARGE DESIGN REQUIREMENTS III.A. STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN CONTENT The owner must develop a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). The SWPPP shall be wq-strm2-68a Page 7 of 34 Permit No: MN R100001 completed prior to submitting any permit application and prior to conducting any construction activity by any required Permittee(s). For stormwater discharges from construction activity where the owner or operator changes, the new owner or operator can implement the original SWPPP created for the project, modify the original SWPPP, or develop and implement their own SWPPP. Permittee(s) shall ensure either directly or through coordination with other Permittee(s) that their SWPPP meets all terms and conditions of this permit and that their activities do not render another party's erosion prevention and sediment control BMPs ineffective. The SWPPP must include the following: A description of the construction activity: The description must be a combination of narrative, plan sheets, and (if appropriate) standard detail sheets that address the foreseeable conditions, at any stage in the construction or post construction activities. The SWPPP must identify the potential for discharge of sediment and/or other potential pollutants from the site. The SWPPP must propose erosion prevention and sediment control BMPs to control the discharge of sediment and/or other potential pollutants from the site. Knowledgeable person/chain of responsibility: As part of the SWPPP, the owner must identify a person knowledgeable and experienced in the application of erosion prevention and sediment control BMPs who will oversee the implementation of the SWPPP, and the installation, inspection and maintenance of the erosion prevention and sediment control BMPs (see Part III.F.1.) before and during construction. The owner must identify in the SWPPP who will have the responsibility for long-term operation and maintenance of the Permanent Stormwater Management System (see Part III.D.). The owner shall include in the SWPPP a chain of responsibility with all operators on the site, or if not known, the title or position of the responsible party, to ensure that the SWPPP will be implemented and stay in effect until the construction project is complete, the entire site has undergone Final Stabilization, and an NOT has been submitted to the MPCA. Once the identity of the responsible party is known, the SWPPP must be amended to include this information. Training documentation: The Permittee(s) shall ensure the individuals identified in Part III.F. have been trained in accordance with this Permit's training requirements. The Permittee(s) shall ensure the training is recorded in or with the SWPPP before the start of construction or as soon as the personnel for the project have been determined. Documentation shall include: a. Names of the personnel associated with this project that are required to be trained per Part III.F.1. of this permit. b. Dates of training and name of instructor(s) and entity providing training. c. Content of training course or workshop including the number of hours of training. 4. Designs, calculations, and narrative: The SWPPP must incorporate the requirements of Part III (Stormwater Discharge Design Requirements) including calculations, Part IV (Construction Activity Requirements) and Appendix A for the project. A narrative describing the timing for installation of all erosion prevention and sediment control BMPs and permanent stormwater management systems required in Part III, Part IV and Appendix A must also be included in the SWPPP. 5. SWPPP components: The SWPPP requirements must be incorporated into the project's final wq-strm2-68a Page 8 of 34 Permit No: MN R100001 plans and specifications and/or project documentation, as appropriate, and must include: a. Location and type of all temporary and permanent erosion prevention and sediment control BMPs along with procedures to be used to establish additional temporary BMPs as necessary for the site conditions during construction. Standard details and/or specifications for the BMPs used on the project must be included in the final plans and specifications for the project. b. Quantities: Estimated preliminary quantities tabulation anticipated at the start of the project for the life of the project must be included for all erosion prevention and sediment control BMPs in the SWPPP (e.g., linear feet of silt fence or ft' of erosion control blanket). c. Impervious surface: The number of acres of impervious surface for both pre- and post - construction must be specified. d. Site map: A site map with existing and final grades, including dividing lines and direction of flow for all pre -and post -construction stormwater runoff drainage areas located within the project limits must be included. The site map must indicate the areas of steep slopes. The site map must also include impervious surfaces, soil types and locations of potential pollutant - generating activities as identified in Part IV.F. Locations of areas not to be disturbed: Buffer zones, as required for temporary BMPs during construction in Part IV.C.9., or if required as permanent BMPs in Appendix A, Part C.3., must be described and identified on plan sheets or project maps in the SWPPP. Construction phasing: Location of areas where construction will be phased to minimize duration of exposed soil areas must be described. g. Maps of surface waters and wetlands: The SWPPP must include a map of all surface waters, existing wetlands, and stormwater ponds or basins which can be identified on maps such as United States Geological Survey 7.5 minute quadrangle maps, the National Wetland Inventory map or equivalent maps within one mile (aerial radius measurement) from the project boundaries that will receive stormwater from the construction site, during or after construction. Where surface waters receiving stormwater associated with construction activity will not fit on the plan sheet, they must be identified with an arrow, indicating both direction and distance to the surface water. The SWPPP must identify if the surface water is a special or impaired water. The site map must also show construction activity areas that are adjacent to and drain to Public Waters for which the Department of Natural Resources has promulgated "work in water restrictions" during specified fish spawning time frames. Final stabilization: Methods to be used for Final Stabilization of all exposed soil areas must be described. BMP design factors: The SWPPP must account for the following factors in designing the temporary erosion prevention and sediment control BMPs: The expected amount, frequency, intensity, and duration of precipitation. The nature of stormwater runoff and run-on at the site, including factors such as wq-strm2-68a Page 9 of 34 Permit No: MN R100001 expected flow from impervious surfaces, slopes, and site drainage features. iii. If any stormwater flow will be channelized at the site, the Permitte(s) must design BMPs to control both peak flowrates and total stormwater volume to minimize erosion at outlets and to minimize downstream channel and streambank erosion. iv. The range of soil particle sizes expected to be present on the site. Soil Management: Methods used to minimize soil compaction and preserve topsoil must be described. Minimizing soil compaction is not required where the function of a specific area of the site dictates that it be compacted. k. Maintenance plan: For projects that include permanent stormwater treatment systems, the SWPPP must include a maintenance plan identifying who will be performing future maintenance of the system. I. Chemical treatments: Any specific chemicals and the chemical treatment systems that may be used for enhancing the sedimentation process on the site, and how compliance will be achieved with the requirements in Part IV.C.10., must be described. m. Documentation of infeasibility: If the Permittee(s) determine(s) that compliance with the requirement for temporary sediment basins (Part III.C.) is infeasible on the project site; the Permittee(s) must document that determination and the substitute BMPs in the SWPPP. If Permittee(s) cannot obtain right-of-way for the permanent stormwater management system; the Permittee(s) must document the infeasibility of obtaining right-of-way (Part III.D.) 6. Stormwater pollution mitigation measures identified in environmental review or other required review: The SWPPP must include any stormwater mitigation measures approved as part of a final environmental review document, endangered species review, archeological or other required local, state or federal review conducted for the project. For the purposes of this permit provision, mitigation measures means actions necessary to avoid, minimize, or rectify (e.g., repairing, rehabilitating, restoring), reducing, eliminating or compensating for impacts related to: (1) stormwater discharges associated with the project's construction activity; and (2) erosion prevention, sediment control and the Permanent Stormwater Management System for the project. 7. Karst areas: The SWPPP must identify additional or different measures necessary (e.g. impervious liner in pond bottom) to assure compliance with surface and groundwater standards in Minn. R. chs. 7050 and 7060 in karst areas and to ensure protection of drinking water supply management areas (see Minn. R. 4720.5100, subp. 13). 8. Impaired Waters and Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs): The SWPPP must address the following: For projects that have a discharge point on the project that is within one mile (aerial radius measurement) of and which flows to an impaired water, the Permittee(s) must identify the impaired water(s) in the SWPPP, and whether or not there is a USEPA-approved TMDL for the pollutant(s) or stressor(s) identified in Appendix A, Part B.10. Unless otherwise notified by the MPCA in writing, the Permittee(s)' identification of impaired waters must be based wq-strm2-68a Page 10 of 34 Permit No: MN R100001 on the most recent USEPA approved section 303(d) Clean Water Act list of impaired waters and USEPA approved TMDLs at the time a complete permit application is submitted. The Permittee(s)' identification must include those TMDLs, applicable to the project's stormwater discharge, that were approved at any time prior to permit application submittal and are still in effect. b. If the TMDL identifies specific implementation activities regarding construction stormwater that would apply to the site discharges, the Permittee(s) must include the BMPs identified in the TMDL and any other specific construction stormwater related implementation activities identified in the TMDL. III.B. SWPPP AMENDMENTS The Permittee(s) must amend the SWPPP as necessary to include additional requirements, such as additional or modified BMPs that are designed to correct problems identified or address situations whenever: There is a change in design, construction, operation, maintenance, weather or seasonal conditions that has a significant effect on the discharge of pollutants to surface waters or underground waters. 2. Inspections or investigations by site owner or operators, USEPA or MPCA officials indicate the SWPPP is not effective in eliminating or significantly minimizing the discharge of pollutants to surface waters or underground waters or that the discharges are causing water quality standard exceedances (e.g., nuisance conditions as defined in Minn. R. 7050.0210, subp. 2). The SWPPP is not achieving the general objectives of minimizing pollutants in stormwater discharges associated with construction activity, or the SWPPP is not consistent with the terms and conditions of this permit. 4. At any time after permit coverage is effective, the MPCA may determine that the project's stormwater discharges may cause, have reasonable potential to cause, or contribute to non -attainment of any applicable water quality standard, or that the SWPPP does not incorporate the applicable requirements in Part III.A.B., (Impaired Waters and TMDLs). If a water quality standard changes during the term of this permit, the MPCA will make a determination as to whether a modification of the SWPPP is necessary to address the new standard. If the MPCA makes such determinations) or any of the determinations in Parts III.6.1.-3., the MPCA will notify the Permittee(s) in writing. In response, the Permittee(s) must amend the SWPPP to address the identified concerns and submit information requested by the MPCA, which may include an individual permit application. If the MPCA's written notification requires a response, failure to respond within the specified timeframe constitutes a permit violation. III.C. TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINS Where ten (10) or more acres of disturbed soil drain to a common location, the Permittee(s) must provide a temporary sediment basin to provide treatment to the runoff before it leaves the construction site or enters surface waters. A temporary sediment basin may be converted to a permanent basin after construction is complete. The temporary basin is no longer required when wq-strm2-68a Page 11 of 34 Permit No: MN R100001 permanent cover has reduced the acreage of disturbed soil to less than ten (10) acres draining to a common location. The Permittee(s) is/are encouraged, but not required, to install temporary sediment basins where appropriate in areas with steep slopes or highly erodible soils even if less than ten (10) acres drains to one area. The basins must be designed and constructed according to the following requirements: 1. The basins must provide live storage for a calculated volume of runoff from a two (2) -year, 24- hour storm from each acre drained to the basin, except that in no case shall the basin provide less than 1,800 cubic feet of live storage from each acre drained to the basin. 2. Where the calculation in Part III.C.1. has not been performed, a temporary sediment basin providing 3,600 cubic feet of live storage per acre drained to the basin shall be provided for the entire drainage area of the temporary basin. Temporary basin outlets must be designed to prevent short-circuiting and the discharge of floating debris. The basin must be designed with the ability to allow complete basin drawdown for maintenance activities, and must include a stabilized emergency overflow to prevent failure of pond integrity. The outlet structure must be designed to withdraw water from the surface in order to minimize the discharge of pollutants, except that the use of a surface withdrawal mechanism for discharge of the basin may be temporarily suspended during frozen conditions. Energy dissipation must be provided for the basin outlet (see Part IV.B.S.). 4. Sediment Basins must be situated outside of surface waters and any buffer zone required under Appendix A.C.3, and must be designed to avoid draining water from wetlands unless the impact to the wetland is in compliance with the requirements of Appendix A, Part D. The temporary basins must be constructed and made operational prior to 10 or more acres of disturbed soil draining to a common location. 6. Where a temporary sediment basin meeting the requirements of this part is infeasible, equivalent sediment controls such as smaller sediment basins, and/or sediment traps, silt fences, vegetative buffer strips, or any appropriate combination of measures are required for all down-slope boundaries of the construction area and for side -slope boundaries as dictated by individual site conditions. In determining whether installing a sediment basin is infeasible, the Permittee(s) must consider public safety and may consider factors such as site soils, slope, and available area on site. This determination of infeasibility must be documented in the SWPPP per Part III.A.S.m. III.D. PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM The Permittee(s) shall design the project so that all stormwater discharged from the project during and after construction activities does not cause a violation of state water quality standards, including nuisance conditions, erosion in receiving channels or on downslope properties, or a significant adverse impact to wetlands caused by inundation or decrease of flow. The Permittee(s) shall construct a permanent stormwater management system meeting the requirements of this Part, or if the project is located in a jurisdiction subject to a NPDES/SDS Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) permit and that permit has established permanent treatment requirements that include volume reduction, the Permittee(s) can comply with the wq-strm2-68a Page 12 of 34 Permit No: MN R100001 permanent treatment requirements established under the MS4 permit in lieu of the permanent treatment requirements of this permit. Where a project's ultimate development replaces vegetation and/or other pervious surfaces with one (1) or more acres of cumulative impervious surface, the Permittee(s) must design the project so that the water quality volume of one (1) inch of runoff from the new impervious surfaces created by the project is retained on site (i.e. infiltration or other volume reduction practices) and not discharged to a surface water. For purposes of this part, surface waters does not include man-made drainage systems that convey stormwater to a compliant permanent stormwater management system. For those projects where infiltration is prohibited (see Part III.D.1.j.), the Permittee(s) shall consider other methods of volume reduction and the water quality volume (or remainder of the water quality volume if some volume reduction is achieved) must be treated by a wet sedimentation basin, filtration system, regional ponding or equivalent methods prior to the discharge of stormwater to surface waters. Where the proximity to bedrock precludes the installation of any of the permanent stormwater management practices outlined in Part III.D., other treatment, such as grassed swales, filtration systems, smaller ponds, or grit chambers, is required prior to the discharge of stormwater to surface waters. For work on linear projects with lack of right-of-way where the Permittee(s) cannot obtain an easement or other permission for property needed to install treatment systems capable of treating the entire water quality volume on site, the Permittee(s) must maximize the water quality volume that can be treated prior to discharge to surface waters. Treatment can be provided through other methods or combination of methods such as grassed swales, filtration systems, smaller ponds, or grit chambers, prior to discharge to surface waters. A reasonable attempt must be made to obtain right-of-way during the project planning process. Documentation of these attempts must be in the SWPPP per Part III.A.5.m. in the section addressing infeasibility. When constructing any of the permanent stormwater management systems in this part, the Permittee(s) must incorporate the following design parameters: 1. Infiltration/Filtration a. Infiltration/Filtration options include but are not limited to: infiltration basins, infiltration trenches, rainwater gardens, sand filters, organic filters, bioretention areas, natural or enhanced swales, dry storage ponds with underdrain discharge, off-line retention areas, and natural depressions. Infiltration must be used only as appropriate to the site and land uses. The method selected by the Permittee(s) must remove settleable solids, floating materials, and oils and grease from the runoff to the maximum extent practicable before runoff enters the infiltration/filtration system. Filtration systems must be designed to remove at least 80 percent of total suspended solids. When designing the system the Permittee(s) must evaluate the impact of constructing an infiltration practice on existing hydrologic features (e.g., existing wetlands) and the system must be designed to maintain pre-existing conditions (e.g., do not breach a perched water table that is supporting a wetland). For a discussion of potential stormwater hotspots, groundwater warnings, design measures, maintenance considerations or other retention, detention, and treatment devices, see the wq-strm2-68a Page 13 of 34 Permit No: MN R100001 Minnesota Stormwater Manual found on the MPCA's website. b. Infiltration systems must not be excavated to final grade until the contributing drainage area has been constructed and fully stabilized unless rigorous erosion prevention and sediment controls are provided (Part III.D.1.c.). When an infiltration system is excavated to final grade (or within three (3) feet of final grade), the Permittee(s) must employ rigorous erosion prevention and sediment controls (e.g., diversion berms) to keep sediment and runoff completely away from the infiltration area. The area must be staked off and marked so that heavy construction vehicles or equipment will not compact the soil in the proposed infiltration area. d. To prevent clogging of the infiltration or filtration system, the Permittee(s) must use a pretreatment device such as a vegetated filter strip, small sedimentation basin, or water quality inlet (e.g., grit chamber) to settle particulates before the stormwater discharges into the infiltration or filtration system. e. The Permittee(s) must design infiltration or filtration systems that provide a water quality volume (calculated as an instantaneous volume) of one (1) inch of runoff (or one (1) inch minus the volume of stormwater treated by another system on the site) from the new impervious surfaces created by the project. f. The Permittee(s) must design the infiltration/filtration system to discharge the water quality volume routed to the system through the soil surface or filter media within 48 hours or less. Additional flows that cannot be infiltrated or filtered within 48 hours must be routed to bypass the system through a stabilized discharge point. The Permittee(s) must design the infiltration system to provide a means to visually verify that the system is discharging through the soil surface or filter media within 48 hours or less. g. The Permittee(s) shall employ appropriate on-site testing consistent with the recommendations found in the Minnesota Stormwater Manual to verify soil type and to ensure a minimum of three (3) feet of separation from the seasonally saturated soils (or from bedrock) and the bottom of the proposed infiltration/filtration system. h. The Permittee(s) must ensure filtration systems with less than three (3) feet of separation from seasonally saturated soils or from bedrock are constructed with an impermeable liner. i. The Permittee(s) must design adequate maintenance access (typically eight (8) feet wide). Infiltration is prohibited when the infiltration system will be constructed in: Areas that receive discharges from vehicle fueling and maintenance. Areas with less than three (3) feet of separation distance from the bottom of the infiltration system to the elevation of the seasonally saturated soils or the top of bedrock. wq-strm2-68a Page 14 of 34 Permit No: MN R100001 iii. Areas that receive discharges from industrial facilities which are not authorized to infiltrate industrial stormwater under an NPDES/SDS Industrial Stormwater Permit issued by the MPCA. iv. Areas where high levels of contaminants in soil or groundwater will be mobilized by the infiltrating stormwater. v. Areas of predominately Hydrologic Soil Group D (clay) soils unless allowed by a local unit of government with a current MS4 permit. vi. Areas within 1,000 feet up -gradient, or 100 feet down -gradient of active karst features unless allowed by a local unit of government with a current MS4 permit. vii. Areas within a Drinking Water Supply Management Area (DWSMA) as defined in Minn. R. 4720.5100, subp. 13., unless allowed by a local unit of government with a current MS4 permit. viii. Areas where soil infiltration rates are more than 8.3 inches per hour unless soils are amended to slow the infiltration rate below 8.3 inches per hour or as allowed by a local unit of government with a current MS4 permit. 2. Wet Sedimentation Basin The Permitte(s) must design the basin to have a permanent volume of 1,800 cubic feet of storage below the outlet pipe for each acre that drains to the basin. The basin's permanent volume must reach a minimum depth of at least three (3) feet and must have no depth greater than 10 feet. The basin must be configured such that scour or resuspension of solids is minimized. The Permittee(s) must design basins to provide live storage for a water quality volume (calculated as an instantaneous volume) of one (1) inch of runoff (or one (1) inch minus the volume of stormwater treated by another system on the site) from the new impervious surfaces created by the project. c. The Permittee(s) must design basin outlets such that the water quality volume is discharged at no more than 5.66 cubic feet per second (cfs) per acre of surface area of the pond. d. The Permittee(s) must design basin outlets to prevent short-circuiting and the discharge of floating debris. Basin outlets must have energy dissipation. e. The Permittee(s) must design the basin to include a stabilized emergency overflow to accommodate storm events in excess of the basin's hydraulic design. f. The Permittee(s) must design adequate maintenance access (typically eight (8) feet wide). g. The Permittee(s) must design sediment Basins to be situated outside of surface waters and any buffer zone required under Appendix A, Part C.3. and they must be designed to avoid draining water from wetlands unless the impact to the wetland is in compliance with the requirements of Appendix A, Part D. wq-strm2-68a Page 15 of 34 Permit No: MN R100001 3. Regional Ponds When the entire water quality volume cannot be retained onsite, the Permittee(s) can use or create regional ponds provided that they are constructed ponds, not a natural wetland or water body, (wetlands used as regional ponds must be mitigated for, see Appendix A, Part D) and designed in accordance with this permit's design requirements (Part III.D.2.) for all water from impervious surfaces that reach the pond. Permittee(s) shall not construct regional ponds in wetlands, regardless of their condition, quality or designation by local plans, unless the mitigative sequence in Appendix A, Part D. of this permit has been completed. There must be no significant degradation of the waterways between the project and the regional pond. The owner must obtain written authorization from the applicable local governmental unit (LGU) or private entity that owns and maintains the regional pond. The LGU's or private entity's written authorization must identify that the regional pond will discharge the water quality volume (one (1) inch of runoff from the impervious watershed area) at no more than 5.66 cfs per acre of surface area of the pond. The owner must include the LGU's or private entities' written authorization in the SWPPP. The LGU's or private entity's written authorization must be obtained before the owner finalizes the SWPPP and before any application for this permit is made to the MPCA. IILE RECORD RETENTION The SWPPP (original or copies) including, all changes to it, and inspections and maintenance records must be kept at the site during construction by the Permittee(s) who has/have operational control of that portion of the site. The SWPPP can be kept in either the field office or in an on-site vehicle during normal working hours. All owner(s) must keep the following records on file for three (3) years after submittal of the NOT as outlined in Part II.C. This does not include any records after submittal of the NOT. 1. The final SWPPP 2. Any other stormwater related permits required for the project 3. Records of all inspection and maintenance conducted during construction (Part IV.E. Inspections and Maintenance) 4. All permanent operation and maintenance agreements that have been implemented, including all right-of-way, contracts, covenants and other binding requirements regarding perpetual maintenance and 5. All required calculations for design of the temporary and permanent Stormwater Management Systems. III.F. TRAINING REQUIREMENTS The Permittee(s) shall ensure the following individuals identified in this part have been trained in accordance with this Permit's training requirements. wq-strm2-68a Page 16 of 34 Permit No: MN R100001 1. Who must be trained: a. Individual(s) preparing the SWPPP for the project b. Individual(s) overseeing implementation of, revising, and amending the SWPPP and individual(s) performing inspections as required in Part IV.E. One of these individual(s) must be available for an onsite inspection within 72 hours upon request by the MPCA. c. Individual(s) performing or supervising the installation, maintenance and repair of BMPs. At least one individual on a project must be trained in these job duties. Training content: The content and extent of training must be commensurate with the individual's job duties and responsibilities with regard to activities covered under this permit for the project. At least one individual present on the permitted project site (or available to the project site in 72 hours) must be trained in the job duties described in Part III.F.1.b. and Part III.F.1.c. 3. The Permittee(s) shall ensure that the individuals are trained by local, state, federal agencies, professional organizations, or other entities with expertise in erosion prevention, sediment control, permanent stormwater management and the Minnesota NPDES/SDS Construction Stormwater Permit. An update refresher -training must be attended every three (3) years starting three (3) years from the issuance date of this permit. PART IV. CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY REQUIREMENTS IV.A. STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN The Permittee(s) must implement the SWPPP and the requirements of this part. The BMPs identified in the SWPPP and in this permit must be selected, installed, and maintained in an appropriate and functional manner that is in accordance with relevant manufacturer specifications and accepted engineering practices. IV.B. EROSION PREVENTION PRACTICES 1. The Permittee(s) must plan for and implement appropriate BMPs such as construction phasing, vegetative buffer strips, horizontal slope grading, inspection and maintenance of Part IV.E. and other construction practices that minimize erosion as necessary to comply with this permit and protect waters of the state. The location of areas not to be disturbed must be delineated (e.g., with flags, stakes, signs, silt fence etc.) on the project site before work begins. The Permittee(s) must minimize the need for disturbance of portions of the project that have steep slopes. For those sloped areas which must be disturbed, the Permittee(s) must use techniques such as phasing and stabilization practices designed for steep slopes (e.g., slope draining and terracing). The Permittee(s) must stabilize all exposed soil areas (including stockpiles). Stabilization must be initiated immediately to limit soil erosion whenever any construction activity has permanently or temporarily ceased on any portion of the site and will not resume for a period exceeding 14 calendar days. Stabilization must be completed no later than 14 calendar days after the construction activity in that portion of the site has temporarily or permanently ceased. For Public Waters that the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources has promulgated "work wq-strm2-68a Page 17 of 34 Permit No: MN R100001 in water restrictions" during specified fish spawning time frames, all exposed soil areas that are within 200 feet of the water's edge, and drain to these waters must complete the stabilization activities within 24 hours during the restriction period. Temporary stockpiles without significant silt, clay or organic components (e.g., clean aggregate stockpiles, demolition concrete stockpiles, sand stockpiles) and the constructed base components of roads, parking lots and similar surfaces are exempt from this requirement but must be in compliance with Part IV.C.S. If using stormwater conveyance channels ,the Permittee(s) must design the channels to route water around unstabilized areas on the site and to reduce erosion, unless infeasible. The Permittee(s) must use erosion controls and velocity dissipation devices such as check dams, sediment traps, riprap, or grouted riprap at outlets within and along the length of any constructed stormwater conveyance channel, and at any outlet, to provide a non-erosive flow velocity, to minimize erosion of channels and their embankments, outlets, adjacent stream banks, slopes, and downstream waters during discharge conditions. 4. The Permittee(s) must stabilize the normal wetted perimeter of any temporary or permanent drainage ditch or swale that drains water from any portion of the construction site, or diverts water around the site, within 200 lineal feet from the property edge, or from the point of discharge into any surface water. Stabilization of the last 200 lineal feet must be completed within 24 hours after connecting to a surface water or property edge. The Permittee(s) shall complete stabilization of the remaining portions of any temporary or permanent ditches or swales within 14 calendar days after connecting to a surface water or property edge and construction in that portion of the ditch has temporarily or permanently ceased. Temporary or permanent ditches or swales that are being used as a sediment containment system during construction (with properly designed rock -ditch checks, bio rolls, silt dikes, etc.) do not need to be stabilized during the temporary period of its use as a sediment containment system. These areas must be stabilized within 24 hours after no longer being used as a sediment containment system. Applying mulch, hydromulch, tackifier, polyacrylamide or similar erosion prevention practices is not acceptable stabilization in any part of a temporary or permanent drainage ditch or Swale. 5. Pipe outlets must be provided with temporary or permanent energy dissipation within 24 hours after connection to a surface water. 6. Unless infeasible due to lack of pervious or vegetated areas, the Permittee(s) must direct discharges from BMPs to vegetated areas of the site (including any natural buffers) in order to increase sediment removal and maximize stormwater infiltration. The Permittee(s) must use velocity dissipation devices if necessary to prevent erosion when directing stormwater to vegetated areas. IV.C. SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES 1. The Permittee(s) must employ Sediment control practices as necessary to minimize sediment from entering surface waters, including curb and gutter systems and storm sewer inlets. wq-strm2-68a Page 18 of 34 Permit No: MN R100001 a. Temporary or permanent drainage ditches and sediment basins that are designed as part of a sediment containment system (e.g., ditches with rock -check dams) require sediment control practices only as appropriate for site conditions. b. If the down gradient sediment controls are overloaded (based on frequent failure or excessive maintenance requirement), the Permittee(s) must install additional upgradient sediment control practices or redundant BMPs to eliminate the overloading, and the SWPPP must be amended to identify these additional practices as required in Part II1.13 L-3. Sediment control practices must be established on all down gradient perimeters and be located upgradient of any buffer zones. The perimeter sediment control practice must be in place before any upgradient land -disturbing activities begin. These practices shall remain in place until Final Stabilization has been established in accordance with Part N.G. A floating silt curtain placed in the water is not a sediment control BMP to satisfy perimeter control requirements in this part except when working on a shoreline and below the waterline. In those cases, a floating silt curtain can be used as a perimeter control practice if the floating silt curtain is installed as close to shore as possible. Immediately after the short term construction activity (e.g. installation of rip rap along the shoreline) in that area is complete, an upland perimeter control practice must be installed if exposed soils still drain to the surface water.. 3. The Permittee(s) shall re -install all sediment control practices that have been adjusted or removed to accommodate short-term activities such as clearing or grubbing, or passage of vehicles, immediately after the short-term activity has been completed. The Permittee(s) shall complete any short-term activity that requires removal of sediment control practices as quickly as possible. The Permittee(s) must re -install sediment control practices before the next precipitation event even if the short-term activity is not complete. 4. All storm drain inlets must be protected by appropriate BMPs during construction until all sources with potential for discharging to the inlet have been stabilized. Inlet protection may be removed for a particular inlet if a specific safety concern (street flooding/freezing) has been identified by the Permittee(s) or the jurisdictional authority (e.g., city/cou nty/township/M n DOT engineer).The Permittee(s) must document the need for removal in the SWPPP. 5. Temporary soil stockpiles must have silt fence or other effective sediment controls, and cannot be placed in any natural buffers or surface waters, including stormwater conveyances such as curb and gutter systems, or conduits and ditches unless there is a bypass in place for the stormwater. 6. Where vehicle traffic leaves any part of the site (or onto paved roads within the site): The Permittee(s) must install a vehicle tracking BMP to minimize the track out of sediment from the construction site. Examples of vehicle tracking BMPs include (but are not limited to) rock pads, mud mats, slash mulch, concrete or steel wash racks, or equivalent systems. b. The Permittee(s) must use street sweeping if such vehicle tracking BMPs are not adequate to prevent sediment from being tracked onto the street (see Part IV.E.S.d.). 7. The Permittee(s) must install temporary sedimentation basins as required in Part III.C. of this permit. wq-strm2-68a Page 19 of 34 Permit No: MN R100001 8. The Permittee(s) must minimize soil compaction and, unless infeasible, preserve topsoil. Minimizing soil compaction is not required where the function of a specific area of the site dictates that it be compacted. 9. The Permittee(s) must preserve a 50 foot natural buffer or (if a buffer is infeasible on the site) provide redundant sediment controls when a surface water is located within 50 feet of the project's earth disturbances and stormwater flows to the surface water. Natural buffers are not required adjacent to road ditches, judicial ditches, county ditches, stormwater conveyance channels, storm drain inlets, and sediment basins. The Permittee(s) is/are not required to enhance the quality of the vegetation that already exists in the buffer or provide vegetation if none exist. However, Permittee(s) can improve the natural buffer with vegetation. 10. If the Permittee(s) intend to use polymers, flocculants, or other sedimentation treatment chemicals on the project site, the Permittee(s) must comply with the following minimum requirements: a. The Permittee(s) must use conventional erosion and sediment controls prior to chemical addition to ensure effective treatment. Chemicals may only be applied where treated stormwater is directed to a sediment control system which allows for filtration or settlement of the floc prior to discharge. b. Chemicals must be selected that are appropriately suited to the types of soils likely to be exposed during construction, and to the expected turbidity, pH, and flow rate of stormwater flowing into the chemical treatment system or area. Chemicals must be used in accordance with accepted engineering practices, and with dosing specifications and sediment removal design specifications provided by the manufacturer or provider/supplier of the applicable chemicals. IV.D. DEWATERING AND BASIN DRAINING 1. The Permittee(s) must discharge turbid or sediment -laden waters related to dewatering or basin draining (e.g., pumped discharges, trench/ditch cuts for drainage) to a temporary or permanent sedimentation basin on the project site unless infeasible. The Permittee(s) may discharge from the temporary or permanent sedimentation basins to surface waters if the basin water has been visually checked to ensure adequate treatment has been obtained in the basin and that nuisance conditions (see Minn. R. 7050.0210, subp. 2) will not result from the discharge. If the water cannot be discharged to a sedimentation basin prior to entering the surface water, it must be treated with the appropriate BMPs, such that the discharge does not adversely affect the receiving water or downstream properties. If the Permittee(s) must discharge water that contains oil or grease, the Permittee(s) must use an oil -water separator or suitable filtration device (e.g. cartridge filters, absorbents pads) prior to discharging the water. The Permittee(s) must ensure that discharge points are adequately protected from erosion and scour. The discharge must be dispersed over natural rock riprap, sand bags, plastic sheeting, or other accepted energy dissipation measures. wq-strm2-68a Page 20 of 34 Permit No: MN R100001 All water from dewatering or basin -draining activities must be discharged in a manner that does not cause nuisance conditions, erosion in receiving channels or on downslope properties, or inundation in wetlands causing significant adverse impact to the wetland. 3. If the Permittee(s) is/are using filters with backwash water, the Permittee(s) must haul the backwash water away for disposal, return the backwash water to the beginning of the treatment process, or incorporate the backwash water into the site in a manner that does not cause erosion. The Permittee(s) may discharge backwash water to the sanitary sewer if permission is granted by the sanitary sewer authority. The Permittee(s) must replace and clean the filter media used in dewatering devices when required to retain adequate function. IV.E. INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE The Permittee(s) must ensure that a trained person (as identified in Part III.A.3.a.) will routinely inspect the entire construction site at least once every seven (7) days during active construction and within 24 hours after a rainfall event greater than 0.5 inches in 24 hours. Following an inspection that occurs within 24 hours after a rainfall event, the next inspection must be conducted within seven (7) days after the rainfall event. 2. All inspections and maintenance conducted during construction must be recorded within 24 hours in writing and these records must be retained with the SWPPP in accordance with Part III.E. Records of each inspection and maintenance activity shall include: a. Date and time of inspections b. Name of person(s) conducting inspections c. Findings of inspections, including the specific location where corrective actions are needed d. Corrective actions taken (including dates, times, and party completing maintenance activities) Date and amount of all rainfall events greater than 1/2 inch (0.5 inches) in 24 hours. Rainfall amounts must be obtained by a properly maintained rain gauge installed onsite, a weather station that is within 1 mile of your location or a weather reporting system that provides site specific rainfall data from radar summaries. f. If any discharge is observed to be occurring during the inspection, a record of all points of the property from which there is a discharge must be made, and the discharge should be described (i.e., color, odor, floating, settled, or suspended solids, foam, oil sheen, and other obvious indicators of pollutants) and photographed. Any amendments to the SWPPP proposed as a result of the inspection must be documented as required in Part III.B. within seven (7) calendar days. 3. Inspection frequency adjustment a. Where parts of the project site have permanent cover, but work remains on other parts of the site, the Permittee(s) may reduce inspections of the areas with permanent cover to wq-strm2-68a Page 21 of 34 Permit No: MN R100001 once per month. b. Where construction sites have permanent cover on all exposed soil areas and no construction activity is occurring anywhere on the site, the site must be inspected during non -frozen ground conditions at least once per month for a period of twelve (12) months. Following the twelfth month of permanent cover and no construction activity, inspections may be terminated until construction activity is once again initiated unless the Permittee(s) is/are notified in writing by the MPCA that erosion issues have been detected at the site and inspections need to resume. Where work has been suspended due to frozen ground conditions, the inspections may be suspended. The required inspections and maintenance schedule must begin within 24 hours after runoff occurs at the site or 24 hours prior to resuming construction, whichever comes first. 4. The Permittee(s) is/are responsible for the inspection and maintenance of temporary and permanent water quality management BMPs, as well as all erosion prevention and sediment control BMPs, until another Permittee has obtained coverage under this Permit according to Part II.B.S. or the project has undergone Final Stabilization, and an NOT has been submitted to the MPCA. 5. The Permittee(s) must inspect all erosion prevention and sediment control BMPs and Pollution Prevention Management Measures to ensure integrity and effectiveness during all routine and post -rainfall event inspections. All nonfunctional BMPs must be repaired, replaced, or supplemented with functional BMPs by the end of the next business day after discovery, or as soon as field conditions allow access unless another time frame is specified below. The Permittee(s) must investigate and comply with the following inspection and maintenance requirements: All perimeter control devices must be repaired, replaced, or supplemented when they become nonfunctional or the sediment reaches one-half (1/2) of the height of the device. These repairs must be made by the end of the next business day after discovery, or thereafter as soon as field conditions allow access. b. Temporary and permanent sedimentation basins must be drained and the sediment removed when the depth of sediment collected in the basin reaches one-half (1/2) the storage volume. Drainage and removal must be completed within 72 hours of discovery, or as soon as field conditions allow access (see Part IV.D.). Surface waters, including drainage ditches and conveyance systems, must be inspected for evidence of erosion and sediment deposition during each inspection. The Permittee(s) must remove all deltas and sediment deposited in surface waters, including drainage ways, catch basins, and other drainage systems, and restabilize the areas where sediment removal results in exposed soil. The removal and stabilization must take place within seven (7) days of discovery unless precluded by legal, regulatory, or physical access constraints. The Permittee(s) shall use all reasonable efforts to obtain access. If precluded, removal and stabilization must take place within seven (7) calendar days of obtaining access. The Permittee(s) is/are responsible for contacting all local, regional, state and federal authorities and receiving any applicable permits, prior to conducting any work in surface waters. wq-strm2-68a Page 22 of 34 Permit No: MN R100001 Construction site vehicle exit locations must be inspected for evidence of off-site sediment tracking onto paved surfaces. Tracked sediment must be removed from all paved surfaces both on and off site within 24 hours of discovery, or if applicable, within a shorter time to comply with Part IV.C.6. Streets and other areas adjacent to the project must be inspected for evidence of off-site accumulations of sediment. If sediment is present, it must be removed in a manner and at a frequency sufficient to minimize off-site impacts (e.g., fugitive sediment in streets could be washed into storm sewers by the next rain and/or pose a safety hazard to users of public streets). 6. All infiltration areas must be inspected to ensure that no sediment from ongoing construction activity is reaching the infiltration area. All infiltration areas must be inspected to ensure that equipment is not being driven across the infiltration area. IV.F. POLLUTION PREVENTION MANAGEMENT MEASURES The Permittee(s) shall implement the following pollution prevention management measures on the site: 1. Storage, Handling, and Disposal of Construction Products, Materials, and Wastes: The Permittee(s) shall comply with the following to minimize the exposure to stormwater of any of the products, materials, or wastes. Products or wastes which are either not a source of contamination to stormwater or are designed to be exposed to stormwater are not held to this requirement: a. Building products that have the potential to leach pollutants must be under cover (e.g., plastic sheeting or temporary roofs) to prevent the discharge of pollutants or protected by a similarly effective means designed to minimize contact with stormwater. b. Pesticides, herbicides, insecticides, fertilizers, treatment chemicals, and landscape materials must be under cover (e.g., plastic sheeting or temporary roofs) to prevent the discharge of pollutants or protected by similarly effective means designed to minimize contact with stormwater. c. Hazardous materials, toxic waste, (including oil, diesel fuel, gasoline, hydraulic fluids, paint solvents, petroleum-based products, wood preservatives, additives, curing compounds, and acids) must be properly stored in sealed containers to prevent spills, leaks or other discharge. Restricted access storage areas must be provided to prevent vandalism. Storage and disposal of hazardous waste or hazardous materials must be in compliance with Minn. R. ch. 7045 including secondary containment as applicable. Solid waste must be stored, collected and disposed of properly in compliance with Minn. R. ch. 7035. Portable toilets must be positioned so that they are secure and will not be tipped or knocked over. Sanitary waste must be disposed of properly in accordance with Minn. R. ch. 7041. wq-strm2-68a Page 23 of 34 Permit No: MN R100001 Fueling and Maintenance of Equipment or Vehicles; Spill Prevention and Response: The Permittee(s) shall take reasonable steps to prevent the discharge of spilled or leaked chemicals, including fuel, from any area where chemicals or fuel will be loaded or unloaded including the use of drip pans or absorbents unless infeasible. The Permittee(s) must conduct fueling in a contained area unless infeasible. The Permittee(s) must ensure adequate supplies are available at all times to clean up discharged materials and that an appropriate disposal method is available for recovered spilled materials. The Permittee(s) must report and clean up spills immediately as required by Minn. Stat. § 115.061, using dry clean up measures where possible. Vehicle and equipment washing: If the Permittee(s) wash the exterior of vehicles or equipment on the project site, washing must be limited to a defined area of the site. Runoff from the washing area must be contained in a sediment basin or other similarly effective controls and waste from the washing activity must be properly disposed of. The Permittee(s) must properly use and store soaps, detergents, or solvents. No engine degreasing is allowed on site. 4. Concrete and other washouts waste: The Permittee(s) must provide effective containment for all liquid and solid wastes generated by washout operations (concrete, stucco, paint, form release oils, curing compounds and other construction materials) related to the construction activity. The liquid and solid washout wastes must not contact the ground, and the containment must be designed so that it does not result in runoff from the washout operations or areas. Liquid and solid wastes must be disposed of properly and in compliance with MPCA rules. A sign must be installed adjacent to each washout facility that requires site personnel to utilize the proper facilities for disposal of concrete and other washout wastes. IV.G. FINAL STABILIZATION The Permittee(s) must ensure Final Stabilization of the site. Final Stabilization is not complete until all requirements of Parts IV.G.1-5. are complete: All soil disturbing activities at the site have been completed and all soils are stabilized by a uniform perennial vegetative cover with a density of 70 percent of its expected final growth density over the entire pervious surface area, or other equivalent means necessary to prevent soil failure under erosive conditions. 2. The permanent stormwater management system is constructed, meets all requirements in Part III.D. and is operating as designed. Temporary or permanent sedimentation basins that are to be used as permanent water quality management basins have been cleaned of any accumulated sediment. All sediment has been removed from conveyance systems and ditches are stabilized with permanent cover. All temporary synthetic and structural erosion prevention and sediment control BMPs (such as silt fence) have been removed on the portions of the site for which the Permittee(s) is/are responsible. BMPs designed to decompose on site (such as some compost logs) may be left in place. 4. For residential construction only, individual lots are considered finally stabilized if the structure(s) are finished and temporary erosion protection and downgradient perimeter control has been completed and the residence has been sold to the homeowner. Additionally, the Permittee has distributed the MPCA's "Homeowner Fact Sheet" to the homeowner to inform wq-strm2-68a Page 24 of 34 Permit No: MN R100001 the homeowner of the need for, and benefits of, permanent cover. 5. For construction projects on agricultural land (e.g., pipelines across crop, field pasture or range land) the disturbed land has been returned to its preconstruction agricultural use. PART V. GENERAL PROVISIONS V.A. APPLICABILITY CRITERIA If the Commissioner determines that pollution in stormwater discharges associated with a construction activity are contributing to a violation of a water quality standard or due to specific site considerations rendering a substantial portion of the requirements of this permit impossible to comply with, and the Commissioner determines that the construction activity would be more appropriately regulated by an individual permit, the Commissioner may terminate coverage under this general permit and require the owner and operator to continue the construction activity subject to an individual stormwater discharge permit. Upon issuance of an individual permit, this general permit would no longer apply. Prior to termination of coverage under this general permit, the Commissioner will provide notice and an opportunity to request a contested case hearing. 2. If the terms and conditions of this general permit cannot be met, an owner may request an individual permit, in accordance with Minn. R. 7001.0210 subp. 6. 3. Any interested person may petition the MPCA to require an individual NPDES/SDS permit in accordance with 40 CFR 122.28(b)(3). V. B. RECORD AVAILABILITY The Permittee(s) must make the SWPPP, including all certificates, reports, records, or other information required by this permit, available to federal, state, and local officials within 72 hours upon request for the duration of the permit and for three (3) years following the NOT. This does not include any records after submittal of the NOT. 2. When requested by the MPCA, the Permittee(s) must make the responsible person trained as required in Part III.F.1.b. or Part III.F.1.c. available to be onsite during an MPCA inspection within 72 hours of a request. V.C. PROHIBITIONS This permit prohibits discharges of any material other than stormwater treated in compliance with this permit and discharges from dewatering or basin draining activities in accordance with Part IV.D.1.-2. Prohibited discharges include (but are not limited to) wastewater from washout of concrete, stucco, paint, form release oils, curing compounds and other construction materials, fuels, oils, or other pollutants used in vehicle and equipment operation and maintenance, soaps or solvents used in vehicle and equipment washing and maintenance, and other hazardous substances or wastes. V. D. TRANSFER OF OWNERSHIP OR CONTROL wq-strm2-68a Page 25 of 34 Permit No: MN R100001 This permit may not be assigned or transferred by the Permittee(s) except when transfer occurs in accordance with the applicable requirements of Part II.6.5. V. E. CIVIL AND CRIMINAL LIABILITY Nothing in this permit must be construed to relieve the Permittee(s) from civil or criminal penalties for noncompliance with the terms and conditions provided herein. Nothing in this permit must be construed to preclude the initiation of any legal action or relieve the Permittee(s) from any responsibilities, liabilities, or penalties to which the Permittee(s) is/are or may be subject to under Section 311 of the Clean Water Act and Minn. Stat. § 115 and 116, as amended. The Permittee(s) is/are not liable for permit requirements for activities occurring on those portions of a site where the permit has been transferred to another party as required in Part II.6.5. or the Permittee(s) has/have submitted the NOT as required in Part II.C. V. F. SEVERABILITY The provisions of this permit are severable. If any provision of this permit, or the application of any provision of this permit to any circumstances, is held invalid, the application of such provision to other circumstances, and the remainder of this permit must not be affected thereby. V.G. NPDES/SDS RULE STANDARD GENERAL CONDITIONS The Permittee(s) must comply with the provisions of Minn. R. 7001.0150, subp. 3 and Minn. R. 7001.1090, subp. 1(A), 1(B), 1(C), 1(H), 1(I), 1(J), 1(K), and 1(L). V. H. INSPECTION AND ENTRY The Permittee(s) must allow access as provided in 40 CFR 122.41(i) and Minn. Stat. § 115.04. The Permittee(s) shall allow representatives of the MPCA or any member, employee or agent thereof, when authorized by it, upon presentation of credentials, to enter upon any property, public or private, for the purpose of obtaining information or examination of records or conducting surveys or investigations. APPENDIX A A. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS All requirements in this Appendix are in addition to BMPs already specified in the permit. Where provisions of Appendix A, conflict with requirements elsewhere in the permit, the provisions in Appendix A take precedence. All BMPs used to comply with this Appendix must be documented in the SWPPP for the project. If the terms and conditions of this Appendix cannot be met, an individual permit will be required in accordance with Minn. R. ch. 7001. B. REQUIREMENTS FOR DISCHARGES TO SPECIAL WATERS AND IMPAIRED WATERS Additional BMPs and enhanced runoff controls identified in this Part are required for discharges to the following special waters (Part B.1 through B.9 of Appendix A) and impaired waters (Part B.10 of Appendix A). The BMPs identified for each special or impaired water are required for those areas of wq-strm2-68a Page 26 of 34 Permit No: MN R100001 the project draining to a discharge point on the project that is within one mile (aerial radius measurement) of special or impaired water and flows to that special or impaired water. 1. Wilderness areas: Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness; Voyageurs National Park; Kettle River from the site of the former dam at Sandstone to its confluence with the Saint Croix River; Rum River from Ogechie Lake spillway to the northernmost confluence with Lake Onamia. Discharges to these waters must incorporate the BMPs outlined in C.1., C.2., and C.3. of this Appendix. Mississippi River: Those portions from Lake Itasca to the southerly boundary of Morrison County that are included in the Mississippi Headwaters Board comprehensive plan dated February 12, 1981. Discharges to these waters must incorporate the BMPs outlined in C.1., C.2. and C.3. of this Appendix. Scenic or recreational river segments: Saint Croix River, entire length; Cannon River from northern city limits of Faribault to its confluence with the Mississippi River; North Fork of the Crow River from Lake Koronis outlet to the Meeker -Wright county line; Kettle River from north Pine County line to the site of the former dam at Sandstone; Minnesota River from Lac qui Parle dam to Redwood County State Aid Highway 11; Mississippi River from County State Aid Highway 7 bridge in Saint Cloud to northwestern city limits of Anoka; and Rum River from State Highway 27 bridge in Onamia to Madison and Rice streets in Anoka. Discharges to these waters must incorporate the BMPs outlined in C.1., C.2. and C.3. of this Appendix. 4. Lake Superior: (Prohibited and restricted) Discharges to Lake Superior must incorporate the BMPs outlined in C.1., C.2. and C.3. of this Appendix. 5. Lake Trout Lakes: Identified in Minn. R. 7050.0470, including those inside the boundaries of the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness and Voyageurs National Park. Discharges to these waters must incorporate the BMPs outlined in C.1., C.2., and C.3. of this Appendix. 6. Trout Lakes: Identified in Minn. R. 6264.0050, subp. 2. Discharges to these waters must incorporate the BMPs outlined in C.1., C.2., and C.3., of this Appendix. 7. Scientific and natural areas: Boot Lake, Anoka County; Kettle River in sections 15, 22, 23, T 41 N, R 20, Pine County; Pennington Bog, Beltrami County; Purvis Lake -Ober Foundation, Saint Louis County; waters within the borders of Itasca Wilderness Sanctuary, Clearwater County; Iron Springs Bog, Clearwater County; Wolsfeld Woods, Hennepin County; Green Water Lake, Becker County; Blackdog Preserve, Dakota County; Prairie Bush Clover, Jackson County; Black Lake Bog, Pine County; Pembina Trail Preserve, Polk County; and Falls Creek, Washington County. Discharges to these waters must incorporate the BMPs outlined in C.1., C.2., and C.3. of this Appendix. 8. Trout Streams: Listed in Minn. R. 6264.0050, subp. 4. Discharges to these waters must incorporate the BMPs outlined in C.1., C.2., C.3., and C.4. of this Appendix. Calcareous Fens: Listed in Minn. R 7050.0180 subp.6b. Discharges to these Calcareous Fens must incorporate the BMPs outlined in C.1, and C.2. of this Appendix. 10. Impaired Waters: Waters identified as impaired under section 303 (d) of the federal Clean Water wq-strm2-68a Page 27 of 34 Permit No: MN R100001 Act for phosphorus (nutrient eutrophication biological indicators), turbidity, dissolved oxygen or aquatic biota (fish bioassessment, aquatic plant bioassessment and aquatic macroinvertebrate bioassessment). a. Impaired Water Without an Approved TMDL or With an Approved TMDL and No Waste Load Allocation: If runoff from the site discharges to an impaired water, and a TMDL has not been approved by USEPA or there is a USEPA approved TMDL that does not establish a Waste Load Allocation (WLA) for construction stormwater, discharges to these waters must incorporate the BMPs outlined in C.1. and C.2. of this Appendix. b. Impaired Water With an Approved TMDL and WLA: If runoff from the site discharges to an impaired water for which there is a USEPA approved TMDL that establishes a WLA for construction stormwater, and the TMDL does not identify any specific implementation activities that would apply to the site discharges, discharges to these waters must incorporate the BMPs outlined in C.1. and C.2. of this Appendix. If the TMDL identifies specific implementation activities regarding construction stormwater that would apply to the site discharges, the Permittee(s) must include the following in the SWPPP: i. Identify the receiving water, the areas of the site discharging to it, and the pollutant(s) identified in the TMDL and ii. BMPs identified in the TMDL and any other specific construction stormwater related implementation activities identified in the TMDL. Note on impaired waters listing terminology: The terms in parenthesis in Appendix A, Part B.10. above are the most current terminology used to list waters as impaired at the time of permit issuance. These terms are subject to change. For example, at one time waters were listed as impaired for phosphorus and now those same waters are listed as impaired for nutrient eutrophication biological indicators. If the terminology changes for one of the pollutant(s) or stressor(s) identified in the permit, the MPCA will keep a list of the new terms on its construction stormwater website. C. ADDITIONAL BMPS FOR SPECIAL WATERS AND IMPAIRED WATERS For the BMPs described in C.2., and C.4. of this Appendix: Where the proximity to bedrock precludes the installation of any of the permanent stormwater management practices outlined in Appendix A, other treatment (such as grassed swales, smaller ponds, or grit chambers) is required prior to discharge to surface waters. For work on linear projects with lack of right-of-way where the Permittee(s) cannot obtain an easement or other permission for property needed to install treatment systems capable of treating the entire water quality volume on site, the Permittee(s) must maximize the water quality volume that can be treated prior to discharge to surface waters. Treatment can be provided through other wq-strm2-68a Page 28 of 34 Permit No: MN R100001 methods or combination of methods such as grassed swales, filtration systems, smaller ponds or grit chambers prior to discharge to surface waters. A reasonable attempt must be made to obtain right- of-way during the project planning process. Documentation of these attempts must be in the SWPPP per Part III.A.5.m. in the section addressing infeasibility. 1. During construction: a. Stabilization of all exposed soil areas must be initiated immediately to limit soil erosion but in no case completed later than seven (7) days after the construction activity in that portion of the site has temporarily or permanently ceased. b. Temporary sediment basin requirements described in Part III.C. must be used for common drainage locations that serve an area with five (5) or more acres disturbed at one time. Post construction: The water quality volume that must be retained on site by the project's permanent stormwater management system described in Part IIID. shall be one (1) inch of runoff from the new impervious surfaces created by the project. See Part III.D.1. for more information on infiltration design, prohibitions and appropriate site conditions. 3. Buffer zone: The Permittee(s) shall include an undisturbed buffer zone of not less than 100 linear feet from the special water (not including tributaries) and this buffer zone shall be maintained at all times, both during construction and as a permanent feature post construction, except where a water crossing or other encroachment is necessary to complete the project. The Permittee(s) must fully document the circumstance and reasons that the buffer encroachment is necessary in the SWPPP and include restoration activities. Replacement of existing impervious surface within the buffer is allowed under this permit. All potential water quality, scenic and other environmental impacts of these exceptions must be minimized by the use of additional or redundant BMPs and documented in the SWPPP for the project. 4. Temperature Controls: The Permittee(s) must design the Permanent Stormwater Management System such that the discharge from the project will minimize any increase in the temperature of trout stream receiving waters resulting from the one (1) -and two (2) -year 24-hour precipitation events. This includes all tributaries of designated trout streams within the Public Land Survey System (PLSS) Section that the trout stream is located. Projects that discharge to trout streams must minimize the impact using one or more of the following measures, in order of preference: a. Minimize new impervious surfaces. b. Minimize the discharge from connected impervious surfaces by discharging to vegetated areas, or grass swales, and through the use of other non-structural controls. c. Infiltration or other volume reduction practices to reduce runoff in excess of pre -project conditions (up to the two (2) -year 24-hour precipitation event). d. If ponding is used, the design must include an appropriate combination of measures such as shading, filtered bottom withdrawal, vegetated swale discharges or constructed wetland treatment cells that will limit temperature increases. The pond should be designed to draw down in 24 hours or less. wq-strm2-68a Page 29 of 34 Permit No: MN R100001 e. Other methods that will minimize any increase in the temperature of the trout stream. D. REQUIREMENTS FOR DISCHARGING TO WETLANDS If the project has any discharges with the potential for significant adverse impacts to a wetland, (e.g., conversion of a natural wetland to a stormwater pond) the Permittee(s) must demonstrate that the wetland mitigative sequence has been followed in accordance with D.1 or D.2 of this Appendix. If the potential adverse impacts to a wetland on a specific project site have been addressed by permits or other approvals from an official statewide program (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 404 program, Minnesota DNR, or the State of Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act) that are issued specifically for the project and project site, the Permittee(s) may use the permit or other determination issued by these agencies to show that the potential adverse impacts have been addressed. For the purposes of this permit, deminimus actions are determinations by the permitting agency that address the project impacts, whereas a non -jurisdictional determination does not address project impacts. 2. If there are impacts from the project that are not addressed in one of the permits or other determinations discussed in Appendix A, Part D.1. (e.g., permanent inundation or flooding of the wetland, significant degradation of water quality, excavation, filling, draining), the Permittee(s) must minimize all adverse impacts to wetlands by utilizing appropriate measures. Measures used must be based on the nature of the wetland, its vegetative community types and the established hydrology. These measures include in order of preference: Avoid all significant adverse impacts to wetlands from the project and post -project discharge. b. Minimize any unavoidable impacts from the project and post -project discharge. c. Provide compensatory mitigation when the Permittee(s) determine(s) that there is no reasonable and practicable alternative to having a significant adverse impact on a wetland. For compensatory mitigation, wetland restoration or creation shall be of the same type, size and whenever reasonable and practicable in the same watershed as the impacted wetland. E. DISCHARGES REQUIRING ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW This permit does not replace or satisfy any environmental review requirements, including those under the Minnesota Environmental Policy Act or the National Environmental Policy Act. The owner must verify that any environmental review required by law, including any required Environmental Assessment Work sheets or Environmental Impact Statements, Federal environmental review, or other required review is complete before making application for coverage under this permit, and the owner must incorporate any stormwater mitigation measures required as the result of any environmental review into the SWPPP for the project. If any part of your common plan of development or sale requires environmental review, coverage under this permit cannot be obtained until such environmental review is complete. F. DISCHARGES AFFECTING ENDANGERED OR THREATENED SPECIES wq-strm2-68a Page 30 of 34 Permit No: MN R100001 This permit does not replace or satisfy any review requirements for endangered or threatened species, from new or expanded discharges that adversely impact or contribute to adverse impacts on a listed endangered or threatened species, or adversely modify a designated critical habitat. The owner must conduct any required review and coordinate with appropriate agencies for any project with the potential of affecting threatened or endangered species, or their critical habitat. G. DISCHARGES AFFECTING HISTORIC PLACES OR ARCHEOLOGICAL SITES This permit does not replace or satisfy any review requirements for historic places or archeological sites, from new or expanded discharges that adversely affect properties listed or eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places or affecting known or discovered archeological sites. The owner must be in compliance with National Historic Preservation Act and conduct all required review and coordination related to historic preservation, including significant anthropological sites and any burial sites, with the Minnesota Historic Preservation Officer. APPENDIX B. — DEFINITIONS 1. "Aerial radius measurement" means the shortest straight line distance measurement between the point of stormwater discharge from a project construction site to the nearest edge of the water body the stormwater will flow to. This measurement does not follow the meander flow path. 2. "Best Management Practices (BMPs)" means the most effective and practicable means of erosion prevention and sediment control, and water quality management practices that are the most effective and practicable means of to control, prevent, and minimize degradation of surface water, including avoidance of impacts, construction -phasing, minimizing the length of time soil areas are exposed, prohibitions, pollution prevention through good housekeeping, and other management practices published by state or designated area -wide planning agencies. Individual BMPs found in this permit are described in the current versions of Protecting Water Quality in Urban Areas, MPCA and The Minnesota Stormwater Manual, MPCA. BMPs must be adapted to the site and can be adopted from other sources. However, they must be similar in purpose and at least as effective and stringent as MPCA's BMPs. (Other sources include manufacturers specifications, Storm Water Management for Construction Activities: Developing Pollution Prevention Plans and Best Management Practices, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1992, and Erosion Control Design Manual, Minnesota Department of Transportation, et al, 1993). 3. "Commissioner" means the Commissioner of the MPCA or the Commissioner's designee. 4. "Common Plan of Development or Sale" means a contiguous area where multiple separate and distinct land -disturbing activities may be taking place at different times, on different schedules, but under one proposed plan. One plan is broadly defined to include design, permit application, advertisement or physical demarcation indicating that land -disturbing activities may occur. 5. "Construction Activity" includes construction activity as defined in 40 C.F.R. pt. 122.26(b)(14)(x) and small construction activity as defined in 40 C.F.R. pt. 122.26(b)(15) and construction activity as defined by Minn. R. 7090.0080, subp. 4. This includes a disturbance to the land that results in a change in the topography, existing soil cover (both vegetative and non -vegetative), or the existing soil topography that may result in accelerated stormwater runoff, leading to soil erosion and wq-strm2-68a Page 31 of 34 Permit No: N N R100001 movement of sediment into surface waters or drainage systems. Examples of construction activity may include clearing, grading, filling, and excavating. Construction activity includes the disturbance of less than one acre of total land area that is a part of a larger common plan of development or sale if the larger common plan will ultimately disturb one (1) acre or more. Construction activity does not include a disturbance to the land of less than five (5) acres for the purpose of routine maintenance that is performed to maintain the original line and grade, hydraulic capacity, or original purpose of the facility. 6. "Dewatering' means the removal of surface or groundwater to dry and/or solidify a construction site to enable construction activity. Dewatering may require a Minnesota Department of Natural Recourses water appropriation permit and, if dewatering water is contaminated, discharge of such water may require an individual MPCA NPDES/SDS permit. 7. "Energy Dissipation" means methods employed at pipe outlets to prevent erosion caused by the rapid discharge of water scouring soils. Examples include, but are not limited to: concrete aprons, riprap, splash pads, and gabions that are designed to prevent erosion. 8. "Erosion Prevention" means measures employed to prevent erosion. Examples include but not limited to: soil stabilization practices, limited grading, mulch, temporary erosion protection or permanent cover, and construction phasing. 9. "Final Stabilization" means required actions in Part IV.G. taken after the completion of construction activities and prior to submitting the NOT that are intended to prevent discharge of pollutants associated with stormwater discharges from the project. 10. "Homeowner Fact Sheet" means a fact sheet developed by the MPCA and available on the MPCA Construction Stormwater website to be given to homeowners at the time of sale by a builder to inform the homeowner of the need for, and benefits of, Final Stabilization. 11. "Infeasible" means not technologically possible or not economically practicable and achievable in light of the best industry practices. 12. "Initiated immediately" means taking an action to commence stabilization as soon as practicable, but no later than the end of the work day, following the day when the earth -disturbing activities have temporarily or permanently ceased, if the Permittee(s) know that construction work on that portion of the site will be temporarily ceased for 14 or more additional calendar days or 7 calendar days where Appendix A.C.1.a applies. The following activities can be taken to initiate stabilization: 1. prepping the soil for vegetative or non -vegetative stabilization 2. applying mulch or other non -vegetative product to the exposed soil area 3. seeding or planting the exposed area 4. starting any of the activities in # 1— 3 on a portion of the area to be stabilized, but not on the entire area and 5. finalizing arrangements to have stabilization product fully installed in compliance with the applicable deadline for completing stabilization wq-strm2-68a Page 32 of 34 Permit No: N N R100001 13. "Impervious Surface" means a constructed hard surface that either prevents or retards the entry of water into the soil and causes water to run off the surface in greater quantities and at an increased rate of flow than prior to development. Examples include rooftops, sidewalks, patios, driveways, parking lots, storage areas, and concrete, asphalt, or gravel roads. 14. "National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)" means the program for issuing, modifying, revoking, reissuing, terminating, monitoring, and enforcing permits under the Clean Water Act (Sections 301, 318, 402, and 405) and United States Code of Federal Regulations Title 33, Sections 1317, 1328, 1342, and 1345. 15. "Natural Buffer" means an area of undisturbed cover surrounding surface waters within which construction activities are restricted. Natural buffer includes the vegetation, exposed rock, or barren ground that exists prior to commencement of earth -disturbing activities. 16. "Normal Wetted Perimeter" means the area of a conveyance, such as a ditch, channel, or pipe that is in contact with water during flow events that are expected to occur from a two-year 24-hour storm event. 17. "Notice of Termination (NOT)" means notice to terminate coverage under this permit after construction is complete, the site has undergone Final Stabilization, and maintenance agreements for all permanent facilities have been established, in accordance with all applicable conditions of this permit. 18. "Operator" means the person designated by the owner, who has day to day operational control and/or the ability to modify project plans and specifications related to the SWPPP. The operator must be named on the permit as a Permittee. 19. "Owner" means the person or party possessing the title of the land on which the construction activities will occur; or if the construction activity is for a lease, easement, or mineral rights license holder, the party or individual identified as the lease, easement or mineral rights license holder; or the contracting government agency responsible for the construction activity. 20. "Permanent Cover" means surface types that will prevent soil failure under erosive conditions. Examples include: gravel, asphalt, concrete, rip rap, roof tops, perennial cover, or other landscaped material that will permanently arrest soil erosion. A uniform perennial vegetative cover ( i.e. evenly distributed, without large bare areas) with a density of 70 percent of the native background vegetative cover for the area must be established on all unpaved areas and areas not covered by permanent structures, or equivalent permanent stabilization measures. Permanent cover does not include the practices listed under temporary erosion protection. 21. "Permittee(s)" means the person or persons, firm, or governmental agency or other entity that signs the application submitted to the MPCA and is responsible for compliance with the terms and conditions of this permit. 22. "Project(s)" means all construction activity that is planned and/or conducted under a particular permit. The project will occur on the site or sites described in the permit application, the SWPPP and in the associated plans, specifications and contract documents. wq-strm2-68a Page 33 of 34 Permit No: MN R100001 23. "Public Waters" means all water basins and watercourses that are described in Minn. Stat. § 103G.005 subd. 15. 24. "Saturated Soil" means the highest seasonal elevation in the soil that is in a reduced chemical state because of soil voids being filled with water Saturated soil is evidenced by the presence of redoximorphic features or other information. 25. "Sediment Control' means methods employed to prevent sediment from leaving the site. Sediment control practices include silt fences, sediment traps, earth dikes, drainage swales, check dams, subsurface drains, bio rolls, rock logs, compost logs, storm drain inlet protection, and temporary or permanent sedimentation basins. A floating silt curtain placed in the water is not a sediment control BMP to satisfy perimeter control requirements, except as provided for in Part IV.C.2. 26. "Stabilize, Stabilized, Stabilization" means the exposed ground surface has been covered by appropriate materials such as mulch, staked sod, riprap, erosion control blanket, mats or other material that prevents erosion from occurring. Grass, agricultural crop or other seeding alone is not stabilization. Mulch materials must achieve approximately 90 percent ground coverage (typically 2 ton/acre). 27. "Standard details" means generic drawings showing a common or repeated construction activity or practice. 28. "Stormwater" is defined under Minn. R. 7077.0105, subp. 41(b), and includes precipitation runoff, stormwater runoff, snowmelt runoff, and any other surface runoff and drainage. 29. "Steep Slopes" means slopes that are 1:3 (V:H) (33.3 percent) or steeper in grade. 30. "Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)" means a plan for stormwater discharge that includes all required content under Part III of this Permit and which describes the erosion prevention BMPs, sediment control BMPs and Permanent Stormwater Management Systems that, when implemented, will decrease soil erosion on a parcel of land and decrease off-site nonpoint pollution. 31. "Surface Water or Waters" means all streams, lakes, ponds, marshes, wetlands, reservoirs, springs, rivers, drainage systems, waterways, watercourses, and irrigation systems whether natural or artificial, public or private, except that surface waters do not include treatment basins or ponds that were constructed from upland. Treatment basins or ponds that were constructed in wetlands and mitigated in accordance with Appendix A.D are also not considered surface waters for purposes of this permit. 32. "Temporary Erosion Protection" means methods employed to prevent erosion during construction activities. Examples of temporary erosion protection include, but are not limited to: straw, wood fiber blanket, wood chips, vegetation, mulch, and rolled erosion control products. 33. "Underground Waters" means water contained below the surface of the earth in the saturated zone including, without limitation, all waters whether under confined, unconfined, or perched conditions, in near surface unconsolidated sediment or regolith, or in rock formations deeper underground. The term ground water shall be synonymous with underground water. wq-strm2-68a Page 34 of 34 Permit No: MN R100001 34. "Waters of the State" (as defined in Minn. Stat. § 115.01, subd. 22) means all streams, lakes, ponds, marshes, watercourses, waterways, wells, springs, reservoirs, aquifers, irrigation systems, drainage systems and all other bodies or accumulations of water, surface or underground, natural or artificial, public or private, which are contained within, flow through, or border upon the state or any portion thereof. 35. "Water Quality Volume" means one (1) inch of runoff from the new impervious surfaces created by this project (calculated as an instantaneous volume) and is the volume of water to be treated in the Permanent Stormwater Management System, as required by this permit. 36. "Wetland" or "Wetlands" is defined in Minn. R. 7050.0186, subp. 1a.B. and includes those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface water or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. Wetlands generally include swamps, marshes, bogs, and similar areas. Constructed wetlands designed for wastewater treatment are not waters of the state. Wetlands must have the following attributes: a. A predominance of hydric soils b. Inundated or saturated by surface water or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support a prevalence of hydrophytic vegetation typically adapted for life in a saturated soil condition and c. Under normal circumstances support a prevalence of such vegetation. wq-strm2-68a APPENDIX D Project Soil Information 3 Soil Map—Wright County, Minnesota 3 m o+ 436100 436200 4.96300 436400 436500 436600 436700 436800 436900 437000 45° 18'8!'N 45° 1&8"N •w+., W7th St Aa— g �O AM 00 ,40 17 -_- mss. 45° 1746'N 45° 17'46'N 436100 436200 436300 436400 436500 436600 4361700 436800 436900 437000 3 3 Map Scale: 1:4,810 if printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5") sheet. Meters N0 50 100 200 300 DO 0 200 400 800 1200 Map projection: Web Mercator Comer coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 15N WGS84 G}DA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 3/1/2017 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 3 MAP LEGEND Area of Interest (AOI) 0 Area of Interest (AOI) Soils 0 Soil Map Unit Polygons rwr Soil Map Unit Lines 0 Soil Map Unit Points Special Point Features Vo Blowout Transportation Borrow Pit — Clay Spot Closed Depression Gravel Pit .4 Gravelly Spot 0 Landfill Background Lava Flow . Marsh or swamp + Mine or Quarry Miscellaneous Water Perennial Water Rock Outcrop Saline Spot d Sandy Spot Severely Eroded Spot Sinkhole Slide or Slip oa Sodic Spot Soil Map—Wright County, Minnesota MAP INFORMATION The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:12,000. Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map measurements. Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL: Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857) Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required. This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Wright County, Minnesota Survey Area Data: Version 10, Sep 19, 2016 Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000 or larger. Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Mar 16, 2012—Apr 6, 2012 The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 3/1/2017 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 3 Spoil Area Stony Spot Very Stony Spot Wet Spot Other Special Line Features Water Features Streams and Canals Transportation — Rails Interstate Highways US Routes L Major Roads Local Roads Background . Aerial Photography MAP INFORMATION The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:12,000. Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map measurements. Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL: Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857) Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required. This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Wright County, Minnesota Survey Area Data: Version 10, Sep 19, 2016 Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000 or larger. Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Mar 16, 2012—Apr 6, 2012 The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 3/1/2017 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 3 Soil Map—Wright County, Minnesota Map Unit Legend usDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 3/1/2017 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3 Wright County, Minnesota (MN171) Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 260 Duelm loamy sand, 0 to 2 0.2 0.3% percent slopes 406 Dorset sandy loam, 0 to 2 72.5 85.3% percent slopes 1288 Seelyeville and Markey soils, 3.3 3.8% ponded, 0 to 1 percent slopes 13776 Dorset -Two Inlets complex, 2 2.5 2.9% to 6 percent slopes 1377C Dorset -Two Inlets complex, 6 4.3 5.0% to 12 percent slopes 1377E Dorset -Two Inlets complex, 20 2.0 2.4% to 35 percent slopes D67A Hubbard loamy sand, 0.2 0.3% Mississippi River Valley, 0 to 2 percent slopes Totals for Area of Interest 85.0 100.0% usDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 3/1/2017 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3 ��TY of City of Monticello — Stormwater Site Plan Review Camping World East Parking Lot Expansion Between 3801 and 3936 Address: Chelsea Road West Permit No: PID: Date Approved: Date Received: Signature: Area of Site Size (acres): 4.359 Disturbance(acres): Not provided Existing Proposed 3.794 (2.276 new Impervious (acres): 1.518 Impervious (acres): impervious) A Stormwater Management Plan is required for: - Any land disturbing activity that may ultimately result in the addition of one acre or greater of impervious surfaces, including smaller individual sites that are part of a common plan of development that may be constructed at different times. - The construction of any new public or private road; or - Any land disturbance activity, regardless of size, that the City determines is likely to cause an adverse impact to an environmentally sensitive area or other property. Submittals Received Date Document Author 6-15-17 Stormwater Management Plan Hakanson Anderson 6-15-17 Plan Set Hakanson Anderson Yes No 1. Scale of Survey. Minimum scale 1" = 50'. Maximum size plan sheet 24" x 36" ❑X ❑ 2. Survey signed by a registered survey with elevations in NGVD-1929 datum for the following locations: • Each lot corner ❑X ❑ • Grade elevation at the foundation and elevation of top of foundation of structures on X ❑ adjacent lots • Grade elevation at the foundation, elevation of top of foundation and garage floor of 0 ❑ proposed new construction • Lowest point of entry (i.e. door sill or top of window well) of proposed and existing 0 ❑ construction • Lowest floor of proposed and existing construction ❑X ❑ 3. Any proposed retaining wall must have a top and bottom elevation and bottom elevation 0 ❑ would be finish grade. Also, no retaining wall is allowed to be built on private property October 2016 4. Retaining walls greater than 4.0 feet in height have been designed and certified by a N ❑ licensed professional engineer and a building permit has been acquired Yes 5. All drainage and utility easements are shown? ❑X ❑ 6. Easements are clear of any encroachments? N ❑ 7. New curb cuts proposed? N ❑ 8. If new curb cut is proposed, stamp all survey maps with the curb cut stamp. Also, write a Erosion control blankets provided on all slopes greater than 3:1 ❑ note on the Residential Plan & Routing Approval form reminding the builder that a curb N N cut permit is required if the driveway is moved or a new driveway is added N 5. 9. Low floor a minimum of 4.25' (feet) above the sanitary sewer invert elevation N ❑ Comments: - The 100 year HWL for the parking area should be represented on the planset (i.e. 955.25 feet at the east and west inlets to the infiltration system). - The existing contours on the east boundary of the property should be added to Sheet C2. - The planset included details for operation and maintenance of the infiltration system. There is a detailed description of cleaning out the isolator row areas with a jetvac. It is unclear if the ports and jets are adequate for cleaning out the other chambers in the system. This should be considered and added to the plans. - Details for all MH structures were not provided. Erosion/Sediment Control Pl Yes No 1. SWPPP notes provided on the plan ❑ ❑X 2. Temporary stabilization measures provided ❑X N 3. Erosion control blankets provided on all slopes greater than 3:1 ❑ ❑ 4. Perimeter Control i.e., Silt Fence, Filter Log, etc. ❑ N 5. Phasing for sites that are > 1 acre ❑ N 6. CB Inlet Protection ❑ N 7. Dewatering ❑ N 8. Sediment control ❑X N 9. Waste control ❑ N 10. Concrete washout ❑ N 11. Rock entrance ❑ N 12. Street sweeping schedule ❑ N 13. Permanent restoration plan ❑ N 14. Erosion protection at all outlet pipes ❑ N 15. SWPPP includes an erosion and sediment control inspection schedule and person ❑ N responsible for maintenance Comments: - Silt fencing is shown on Sheet C2 however the silt fence is required along the entire curb line and encompass the entire grading area. - Details for a rock construction entrance was provided, however it is not shown on the plans. -SWPPP not provided. When submitted, include missing erosion and sediment control requirements as demonstrated above and follow the SWPPP checklist that the City provided for your use. Stormwater Management Plan _ Yes No 1. Delineation maps for existing and proposed conditions ❑X ❑ 2. Modeling calculations for existing and proposed conditions using Atlas 14 storm events with an MSE3 type distribution. October 2016 • 2 year 24 hr. (2.84"), 10 year 24 hr. (4.22"), 100 (6.87), 10 -day snowmelt (7.2") ❑ 0 • Modeled direct connected impervious separate ❑X ❑ 3. Off-site drainage included ❑X ❑ 4. Wetlands shown on plans and wetland permitting completed ® ❑ 5. Pretreatment ❑X ❑ 6. Skimmer structures provided on the outlets of all ponds. ❑ ❑ 7. Soil borings ❑X ❑ 8. Design Infiltration Rate Determination — Geotechnical Report or Infiltration Testing 0 ❑ provided 9. Seasonal High Water Elevation ❑ 0 10. Open channel flow calculations ❑ 0 11. Storm sewer calculations — 10 year event ❑ ❑X 12. Narrative describing the following: Existing conditions consist of open fields, an existing parking lot, and two a. Existing Conditions: existing buildings. Drainage flows to the north part of the lot. Proposed conditions include the addition of a large parking lot and underground infiltration system. The outlet for the infiltration system will connect into the b. Proposed Conditions: existing storm sewer system to the south. Stormwater management includes the addition of an infiltration system to meet volume reduction requirements. c. Stormwater Management for Proposed A downstream regional pond provides rate control for the Site: site. Comments: -The downstream rate control pond was designed for this site to have a composite curve number of 87. The submitted HydroCAD model has a composite CN value of 93. (4.359 ac with CN=98 and 3.794 ac with CN=61) - The stormwater report indicated that there is 2.317 acres of new impervious area created for this project. The HydroCAD model input shows 2.276 acres of new impervious area modeled. This discrepancy should be corrected. - Storm sewer calculations were not provided, however all of the drainage for the site is routed through the underground infiltration system via sheet flow. The only proposed stormsewer (the 18" connection to Chelsea Road) was modeled in HydroCAD and provides adequate capacity for the 10 year event. Water Quality and Volume Reduction "The City of Monticello has adopted MPCA Minimal Impact Design Standards in Chapter 4 of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Section 4.10. MIDs Infiltration design criteria as described in the MPCA Stormwater Manual shall be followed for the proposed project " Yes 4 No 1. Volume control provided as per the City's Engineering Design Standards and MIDS (1.1" 0 ❑ over new impervious surface) 2. Impervious area equal to or greater than the net increase in impervious surface is routed 0 ❑ through infiltration BMP 3. Sequencing provided for alternatives where infiltration is infeasible ❑ ❑X 4. Required Volume Reduction: 9251 cu. Ft. 5. Provided Volume Reduction: 9330 cu. Ft. 6. Separation to groundwater and/or bedrock is a minimum of 3 feet from bottom of X ❑ infiltration BMP 7. Drawdown time for infiltration BMP is within 48 hours ❑X ❑ 8. Proposed ponds meet or exceed NURP design criteria ❑X N 9. If infiltration of 1.1" is not feasible, water quality goals are met with NURP pond on site? ❑ 0 Comments: October 2016 -Volume reduction and water quality standards are met with the proposed underground infiltration system. - The infiltration provided (9330 cubic feet) is proposed between 949.75 feet and 950.20 feet. In order to verify that 950.20 feet is the correct elevation to use for this calculation, a detail for the outlet control structure (STM MH#4) is needed. Rate Control Yes No 1. Peak Proposed Discharge Rates < Existing ❑ 2. Existing infrastructure can accommodate peak discharge rates for 10 year storm? ❑X ❑ 3. Existing infrastructure and EOF for proposed 100 year peak discharge rate? ❑ ❑X 4. Proposed flow patterns do not create flooding impacts for structures adjacent to the ❑X ❑ property? Comments: - Rate control is met at the regional pond downstream of the site. However, the composite CN for the development needs to be equal to 87 for compliance with the pond design. ❑ • 2' above EOF of major basins Freeboard Yes No 1. Building Opening: • 2' above the critical 100 -yr HWL of local basins, wetlands, & infiltration basins ® ❑ • 2' above EOF of local basins, wetlands, & infiltration basins ❑ ❑X • 2' above the 100 -yr flow elevation of a swale or channel at the point where the Swale ❑ ❑ channel is closest to the building 2. Low Floor Elevation: • 2' above the critical 100 -yr HWL of major basins ❑ ❑ • 2' above EOF of major basins ❑ ❑ • For landlocked basins: 2' above the HWL from back to back 100 -yr rainfalls or 2' above the HWL from the 100 -yr 10 -day snowmelt, whichever is higher. Starting elevation of the basin/waterbody prior to runoff is one of the following: o Existing Ordinary High Water level established by the Minnesota Department ❑ ❑ of Natural Resources o Annual water balance calculation approved by the City ❑ ❑ o Local observation well records, as approved by the City ❑ ❑ o Mottled soil ❑ ❑ October 2016 WSB Building a legacy — your legacy. July 19, 2017 Ms. Angela Schumann Community Development Director City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1 Monticello, MN 55362 Re: Camping World Development Stage PUD Dump Station Proposal Review City Project No. 2017-011 WSB Project No. 2596-410 Dear Ms. Schumann: 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763-541-4800 Fax: 763-541-1700 We have reviewed the dump station proposal submitted by Kinghorn Company on July 10, 2017 and offer the following comments. 1. The location, size, material and circulation pattern of the proposed dump stations shall be shown on the site plans. 2. Clarify if the proposed dump station #1 will be open to the public and not just for Camping World customer use. The applicant has identified that dump station #2 at the former Bedrock Motors site, will be for detail personnel use only. Hours of operation will be from Sam to 5pm Monday through Saturday. 3. The applicant is proposing to pump and haul sewage from the dump station off site, which is preferred by the City. 4. Will water be needed for the operation of the proposed dump tanks? If so, the civil plans should identify how this will be accomplished. Please have the applicant provide a written response addressing the comments above. Please give me a call at 763-271-3236 if you have any questions or comments regarding this letter. Thank you. Sincerely, Equal Opportunity Employer wsbeng.com K:\02596-410\Admin\Docs\LTR-a-Schumann-Camping World 071917.docz July 19, 2017 Page 2 WSB & Associates, Inc. Shibani K. Bisson, PE City Engineer cc: Steve Grittman, NAC skb K:\02596-410\Admin\Docs\LTR-a-Schumann-Camping World 071917.docz Main Office: H4 0 eil{anson 3601 Thurston Avenue, Anoka, MN 55303 427-5860 Fax: 763/427-0520 An erson www.haa-inc.comPhone: 763/i MEMORANDUM TO: Shibani Bisson, Monticello City Engineer CC: John Kinghorn, Kinghorn Construction FROM: Tim Eggerichs, Project Engineer DATE: July 18, 2017 RE: Camping World East Parking Lot Expansion City of Monticello We have received your comments from the Stormwater Site Plan Review for the Camping World East Parking Lot Expansion Project in the City of Monticello. Your comments and our responses are as follows: General Site Plan: COMMENT: The 100 year HVL for the parking area should be represented on the planset (i.e. 955.25 feet at the east and west inlets to the infiltration system). HAI Response (7/18/17): The HWL has been added to sheet C2. 2. COMMENT: The existing contours on the east boundary of the property should be added to Sheet C2. HAI Response (7/18/17): Contours have been added east of the property. 3. COMMENT: The planset included details for operation and maintenance of the infiltration system. There is a detailed description of cleaning out the isolator row areas with a jetvac. It is unclear if the ports and jets are adequate for cleaning out the other chambers in the system. This should be considered and added to the plans. HAI Response (7/18/17): The isolator rows are designed to capture the system sediment load. These systems are designed to clean out only the isolator rows. The other rows do have inspection ports to ensure that they are functioning properly. 4. COMMENT: Details for all MH structures were not provided. HAI Response (7/18/17): General note 1 has been added to sheet C5 referencing Mn/DOT Standard Plates 4020 and 4022 and City Standard Plate 4003, which has been added to sheet C3. Erosion/Sediment Control Plan: 1. COMMENT: Silt fencing shown on the Sheet C2 however the silt fence is required along the entire curb line and encompass the entire grading area. HAI Response (7/18/17): Silt fence has been added to sheet C2. 2. COMMENT: Details for a rock construction entrance was provided however it is not shown on the plans. HAI Response (7/18/17): The stabilized construction entrance location has been added to sheet C2. 3. COMMENT: SWPPP not provided. When submitted, includes missing erosion and sediment control requirements as demonstrated above and follow the SWPPP checklist that the City provided for your use. HAI Response (7/18/17): A revised SWPPP is included with this submittal. Stormwater Management Plan: 1. COMMENT: The downstream rate control pond was designed for this site to have a composite curve number of 87. The submitted HydroCAD model has a composite CN volume of 93. (4.359 ac with CN=98 and 3.794 ac with C=61) HAI Response (7/18/17): We assume the curve number of 87 for the regional pond design assumed no onsite storage would be provided. We have added onsite storage to significantly reduce the discharge rates from the site. A section in the revised Stormwater Management Plan addresses this item. 2. COMMENT: The stormwater report indicated there is 2.317 acres of a new impervious area created for this project. The HyroCAD model input shows 2.276 acres of new impervious area modeled. This discrepancy should be corrected. HAI Response (7/18/17): The Stormwater Management Plan has been revised. The report and the HydroCAD model are now consistent. Hakanson 1--illAnderson 3. COMMENT: Storm sewer calculations were not provided, however all of the drainage for the site is routed through underground infiltration system via sheet now. The only storm sewer (the 18" connection to Chelsea Road) was modeled in HydroCAD and provides adequate capacity for the 10 year event. HAI Response (7/18/17): Comment noted. Water Oualitv and Volume Reduction: COMMENT: Volume reduction and water quality standards are met with the proposed underground infiltration system. HAI Response (7/18/17): Comment noted. 2. COMMENT: The infiltration provided (9330 cubic feet) is proposed between 949.75 feet and 950.20 feet. In order to verify that 950.20 feet is the correct elevation to use for this calculation, a detail for the outlet control structure (STM MH#4) is needed. HAI Response (7/18/17): Infiltration is proposed between elevation 949.00 and 950.22. 949.00 is the elevation of the bottom of the coarse aggregate as shown on sheet C5. As shown on sheet C5, the system outlets through STM/MH #4 at an elevation of 950.22, which is the elevation of the 18" RCP outlet pipe to the south. STM/MH #4 will be a typical manhole per Mn/DOT Standard Plate 4020. Rate Control: COMMENT: Rate control is met at the regional pond downstream of the site. However, the composite CN for the development needs to be equal to 87 for compliance with the pond design. HAI Response (7/18/17): We assume the curve number of 87 for the regional pond design assumed no onsite storage would be provided. We have added onsite storage to significantly reduce the discharge rates from the site. A section in the revised Stormwater Management Plan addresses this item. ■■'Hakanson Anderson 07/24/17 4D. Consideration of authorizing members of the Citv Council to participate in an upcoming I-94 Coalition lobbving effort (Sept 12, 13) in Washington DC at an estimated cost of $1,000 per participant (JO) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: As in 2016, the I-94 Coalition is gearing up to send a team of representatives to Washington DC to help lobby for improvements to the I-94 corridor. As a member of the coalition, Monticello has been asked if there is interest in sending one or more representatives to be part of the team going to Washington DC. An itinerary for the trip has not yet been set up but I am sure it will look similar to the 2016 visit described as follows: The group plans to meet with key DC Legislators (Klobuchar, Franken, Emmer, and Paulsen) as well as key decision makers from the US DOT who can all help with some possible federal grants TIGER and FASTLANE we are currently working with MnDOT District 3 for Phase II which they will hopefully be applying for on I-94. Bot also noted that the 194 Coalition still intend to work heavily through the State and the Corridors of Commerce program from where our financial success has come thus far but we need to continue to be opportunistic and it appears there is some opportunity at the Federal level as well with their resent passing of the FAST Act Transportation Bill. All meetings will be set up and coordinated by DC Lobbyists, Andy Burmeister and Denny McGrann with LGN who most of you are familiar with. The coalition runs on a tight budget and no coalition funds go directly to DC efforts (although many of our Cities and Chambers help individually) so you or your organization would have to cover the cost of the trip, not the Coalition. This invitation provides Monticello with the opportunity to show support for this important effort. The Coalition has done a great job of developing identifying the need and nurturing the political momentum which has resulted in construction of six lanes to the Crow River. Participation by Monticello leaders, beyond the annual financial contribution, serves to reinforce the great efforts made by the Coalition and would contribute toward keeping the ball rolling on further development of improvements along the I-94 Corridor. Al. Budget Impact: City Council travel budget is sufficient to cover this request which is estimated at $1,000 per participant. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to authorize one or more members of Council to participate in the effort. 07/24/17 Last year Councilmembers Hilgart and Gabler attended. More information to follow for those who are attending. 2. Motion to not approve the contribution and return the funds to the donors. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends alternative 1. It is up to Mayor Stumpf and City Council to decide who should go. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • None CITY OF MontiAo COUNCIL CONNECTION JULY 24, 2017 ADMINISTRATION New Telephone Install Complete FiberNet installed the new telephone system at the Monticello Community Center and City Hall the week of July 10. They returned the week of July 17 to complete the installation at Public Works, the DMV, and Hi -Way Liquors. During the transition, each department was able to review their features and makes adjustments to their phones. In addition to more minor changes, this included disconnecting several telephone numbers we determined we no longer needed and adding auto attendants for several departments. At Hi -Way Liquors the auto -attendant picks up right away with a recording to announce the store hours before ringing through to staff. At Public Works and City Hall the auto attendant is used if staff is unable to answer the call or if the call comes in after hours. It allows callers to select the specific department to leave a voicemail. Most departments were able to have the new phones installed without losing their main telephone line for an extended period of time, which minimized disruption to customers. The exception was the DMV; their office had an equipment problem the day after the installation that caused them to lose phone service in the morning. There were also a couple of disrupted connections at City Hall, but they were identified and corrected. We will continue to monitor all of the department phones to ensure they are meeting staff and customer expectations. CITY OF Montido COUNCIL CONNECTION JUNE, 2017 113►V Transactions June 2017, the DMV processed 6,607 transactions 514 more than June 2016. DMV year - to date revenue is $334,962.59 an increase of $44,806.27 or 15.4% over the same period last year. Please see the following graphs for more detail. $60,000 $50,000 $40,000 $30,000 $20,000 $10,000 7,000 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 DMV Revenue Comparison $51,287 June 2011 June 2012 June 2013 June 2014 June 2015 June 2016 June 2017 DMV Transaction Comparison 1, © -- 4,477 June 2011 June 2012 June 2013 June 2014 June 2015 June 2016 June 2017 DMV Year -to -Date Revenue Comparison $400,000 $350,000 $300,000 $250,000 $200,000 $150,000 $100,000 $50,000 $- 50,000 45,000 40,000 35,000 30,000 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 $291,516 $290,156 $256,122 $247,738 $266,008 _ 933.4,963 June 2011 June 2012 June 2013 June 2014 June 2015 June 2016 June 2017 DMV Year -to -Date Transaction Comparison 45,283 June 2011 June 2012 June 2013 June 2014 June 2015 June 2016 June 2017 CITY OF M nti eff0 A& COUNCIL CONNECTION JULY 24, 2017 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Summary of Recent Meetings: • Volunteer Picnic, Ellison Park, June 22, 2017 • Rotary Club Meeting, June 26, 2017 • Econ. Dev. Assoc. of MN (EDAM) Summer Conference, Nisswa, MN, June 28-30, 2017 • Rotary Club Meeting, July 10, 2017 • Meeting with Multi -Family Housing Developer, July 13, 2017 • Rotary Club Meeting, July 17, 2017 • Micro Brewery Community Revitalization Research (See attached articles) Craft beer's big impact on small towns and forgotten neighborhoods - Curbed PROPERTY LINES REAI.. ESTATE Craft beer's big impact on small towns and forgotten neighborhoods Page 1 of 10 3 Brewing is behind plenty of comebock stories in cities and rural oreos ocross the U.S. BY PATRICK SISSON I JUN 13, 2017, 12:25PM EOT Getty Images When Neil Gurnsey grabs a drink at his favorite bar, he's delighted when nobody knows his name. https://www.curbed.com/2017/6/l3/l5788960/brewing-economic-development-craft-beer 7/7/2017 Craft beer's big impact on small towns and forgotten neighborhoods - Curbed Page 2 of 10 Gurnsey loves to see his new watering hole, the taproom at Hand of Fate Brewing, packed with people from outside Petersburg, Illinois, a small bedroom community of roughly 2,20o near the capital, Springfield. Started last May by Mike Allison, a former funeral director who turned his homebrewing hobby into a thriving small business in his hometown, Hand of Fate took its name from the town's origin story (during a card game between two early settlers, Peter Lukins and George Warburton, Warburton drew the losing hand). After just a year, the small brewery has brought good fortune to the town. After taking over an old Dollar General discount store in the sparsely occupied town square, the brewery -and -taproom has become a community hub and a catalyst keeping businesses open later. It's encouraged others—including two new boutiques—to open shop, and drawn visitors from across the region. This year's "Drinkin' with Lincoln" street festival was a big hit. "Once Mike got the brewery going," says Gurnsey, an assistant vice president at the National Bank of Petersburg, "life was just injected into the square. If I go inside the bar and see that I know just io people out of loo, that's great." https://www. curbed. com/2017/6/13/15788960/brewing-economic-development-craft-beer 7/7/2017 Craft beer's big impact on small towns and forgotten neighborhoods - Curbed Page 3 of 10 Hand of Fate Brewing in downtown Petersburg, Illinois. I Hand of Fate Brewing Breweries, taprooms, and bars have always been about more than beer, serving as community hubs, gathering places, and sources of local identity and pride. But as Hand of Fate shows, they're also increasingly serving as engines of economic development and catalysts for cities and towns, especially in rural areas. g FROM OUR SPONSOR CONTINUE FOR MORE CONTENT Allison's business—which churns out a variety of IPAs, cream ales, and saisons—may directly employ io people, but the ancillary benefits of the brewery and taproom, like others in the country, radiate into the community in different ways. https://www.curbed.com/2017/6/l3/l5788960/brewing-economic-development-craft-beer 7/7/2017 Craft beer's big impact on small towns and forgotten neighborhoods - Curbed Page 4 of 10 As the booming craft -beer industry, which contributed 855.7 billion to the U.S. economy in 2014, continues to expand, more and more municipalities and states have tried to turn this industry into a means to spur growth. According to Bart Watson, chief economist at the Brewers Association, about 8o percent of Americans live within 10 miles of a brewery. Small towns and abandoned industrial areas are prime candidates for regeneration -by -brewery. Portland -based beer writer Jeff Alworth has seen the industry revive towns across Oregon and the U.S. Amid talk of hops and flavor profiles, drinkers sometimes forget the impressive industrial scale of brewing operations—and the jobs it can provide. A typical taproom makes Soo -gallon batches multiple times a day, employing men and women to haul fully loaded, 165 -pound kegs across a factory floor, and retrofitting spaces and installing brewery equipment requires skilled craftsmen and laborers. Rising Tide Brewery employee Eric Altman loads four packs of beer into cases during a canning run at the Portland, Maine, brewery on Monday afternoon. I John Ewing/Portland Press Herald via Getty Images https://www. curbed. com/2017/6/13/15788960/brewing-economic-development-craft-beer 7/7/2017 Craft beer's big impact on small towns and forgotten neighborhoods - Curbed Page 5 of 10 That requires lots of space, says Watson, which is why brewing, a capital - intensive industry, is perfect for depressed areas with lots of excess and abandoned industrial real estate. That large footprint, however, is part of the reason for an oversize community impact; taprooms and bars are magnets that draw people in, and with traditional bars and VFW halls (Veterans of Foreign Wars) closing, these new spaces become community hubs and event spaces, not just another place to grab a drink. And, according to research by Julie Wartell, a lecturer at University of California at San Diego, bars attached to breweries result in much less crime than regular bars. Margo Metzger, director of the North Carolina Craft Brewers Guild, has seen craft brewing explode in her state, generating $1.2 billion and 10,00o jobs in 2014. At that time, North Carolina had a little over loo breweries; a few years later, after big names such as Sierra Nevada, New Belgium, and Oskar Blues all opened facilities near Asheville, the state boasts 215 breweries. The dramatic increase in overall business comes from those bigger names, she says. But when it comes to real economic impact people can feel, it's the small towns, when someone makes a bet on a little-known street, where it matters. "I've spent my whole life here, and suddenly, you see breweries in forgotten Eastern North Carolina towns such as Rocky Mount and Tarboro," she says. "It gives people a public house and a reason to want to live there. But more importantly, it makes people feel like they're in a relevant place. It's something new, beyond the old story of a fading town they've heard for decades. It's a powerful, kickstarting force, a spark that I've seen. time and again in this state." It's not just small towns; urban neighborhoods have thrived and been reborn with the help of pioneering breweries. Great Lakes Brewing Company helped resuscitate Cleveland's Ohio City neighborhood after opening in 1988, and has been so successful that locals now worry about a beer glut. Wynkoop Brewing https://www.curbed.com/2017/6/13/15788960/brewing-economic-development-craft-beer 7/7/2017 Craft beer's big impact on small towns and forgotten neighborhoods - Curbed Page 6 of 10 Company in Denver, which also opened in 1988, was a pioneer in re-establishing the now -hip LoDo neighborhood. And in Jacksonville, Florida, a string of breweries on King Street, in tandem with a city infrastructure program, brought new life to a former abandoned commercial corridor. "It's something new, beyond the old story of a fading town they've heard for decades. It's a powerful, kickstarting force, a spark that I've seen time and again in this state." In addition to immediate economic benefits and establishing a sense of place, successful breweries are a huge draw for the increasingly lucrative world of craft -beer tourism. According to Watson, recent Brewers Association data shows that 1.6 percent of craft -beer drinkers take 10 -plus trips annually to brewers more than two hours from their home. A study in Kent County, Michigan, which includes Grand Rapids and breweries like Brewery Vivant and Mitten Brewing Company, showed that these businesses generated $7.05 million in direct spending from 42,426 visitors, who racked up more than 14,00o hotel nights. The latest data from New York state found that beer tourism in 2013 attracted 3.66 million visitors and $450 million in business exclusive of beer sales, supporting more than 3,000 jobs. Breweries have taken advantage of the trend and created special events, such as Goose Island's release of Bourbon County Stout and the Three Floyds' Dark Lord Day, that draw massive crowds and bring drinkers and dollars to town. Professor Jeff Dense of Eastern Oregon University calculated that the annual Oregon Brewers Festival generated $32.6 million for the local Portland economy. Perhaps the granddaddy of these festivals, Pliny the Younger Day, sees Russian River Brewing in Sonoma County release its famed Pliny the Elder, an https://www. curbed. com/2017/6/13/15788960/brewing-economic-development-craft-beer 7/7/2017 Craft beer's big impact on small towns and forgotten neighborhoods - Curbed Page 7 of 10 imperial India Pale Ale. Last year's event in February drew 16,000 customers and created an total economic impact of nearly $5 million. "Pliny has been to Sonoma County what Robert Mondavi was for Napa," Ben Stone, executive director of the Sonoma County Economic Development Board, told the local Press Democrat. CRAFT BEER RAPIDLY BECOMING A DESTINATION, NOT in JUST SOMETHING TO DRINK HtM er=g , tf drip, croft tie veries have: Vim+' v nett at their site rm thy* post 31 ria,nths? Nielsen's Craft Beer Insight Poll 0 w CRAFT BREWERIES WITHIN CRAFT BREWERIES VISITED 11-2il011RS OF HOME WHILE TRAVEUNG 71% of WEEKLY Craft 60% of WEEKLY Crag Beer Qrinken Seer Drinkers 4.2 Average VisiiS 2.7 Average Visits Local governments are increasingly working to attract breweries and the craft - brew industry in the name of economic development and growth. Watson says that Virginia, Ohio, and North Carolina have all been aggressive in offering incentives to brewers (at the same time the Asheville area landed the trio of big name brewery facilities, the city of Roanoke, Virginia, was courting companies with a $13 million incentive package). New York state has used brewing as a means to grow local agriculture: The state's farm brewing licenses, for instance, provide new companies with certain retail privileges in exchange for using a certain percentage of crops from in-state. The new license has helped spur the development of local hops and barley crops. https://www. curbed. com/2017/6/13/15788960/brewing-economic-development-craft-beer 7/7/2017 Craft beer's big impact on small towns and forgotten neighborhoods - Curbed Page 8 of 10 Cities have also pushed to bring more beer into city limits. Chicago turned to tax -increment financing to create a brewery district in the Motor Row District, an industrial area once known for car dealerships. Duquesne, Pennsylvania, a town downriver from Pittsburgh, revised their zoning plan a few years go to make it easier to attract microbreweries, and even bought up old abandoned buildings to sell to potential brewers. Mesa, Arizona, promoted its downtown specifically as a magnet for local brewers. One of the more striking example was Zoiglhaus in Portland, a city known as a mecca for beer geeks. The city's economic development council invested $1 million to help the brewery as long as it agreed to locate in the Lents District, a far eastern area that's been underinvested for decades. The taproom at Hand of Fate Brewing. I Hand of Fate Brewing Back in Petersburg, Hand of Fate's success in building up the town square has meant new opportunities for the company. Allison has already purchased another 2,50o -square -foot facility, and he plans to expand into packaging cans and kegs and selling off-site. As far as the brewery's impact on the community, the tap is far from running dry. "The name of the brewery does come from the town's name," says Allison. "But it's also because everything just really fell into place for us." https://www. curbed.com/2017/6/13/15788960/brewing-economic-development-craft-beer 7/7/2017 Breweries find themselves at center of neighborhood development 12014-01-24 1 Grand R... Page 8 of 12 They transformed the rusted -out building on the south edge of downtown Grand Rapids into a warm, friendly taproom and production brewery. Now, seven years and another $25 million expansion later, it's even warmer and friendlier. The owners of Founders Brewing Co., 235 Grandville Ave. SW, have turned the old industrial transportation hub into a thriving brewery, not to mention a cultural hub of Grand Rapids — or Beer City USA. It wasn't the first time Founders had searched out such a location. The brewery started in 1997 in the Brass Works Building on North Monroe, which was not the hopping location it is now. The main draw of both locations: plenty of space at a cheap price. Both qualities are a necessity for breweries because startup costs are expensive and equipment takes up a lot of space. "I look back to North Monroe: We were boarded -up windows, no retail," Engbers said. "People were interested in coming down to see what we were doing — people thought we were crazy. But within a few years, the area started to blossom." Low-cost neighborhoods appeal to businesses that don't have a lot of capital to get started. Once a business moves in and sees some success, like-minded business owners often follow suit. When Founders moved into its current Grandville Avenue location, Custer Office Furniture was nearby and The Intersection nightclub was a few doors down. The Rapid Central Station provided a hub of activity and Grand Rapids Ballet's Peter Martin Wege Theatre drew arts patrons. Soon a steady crowd of people were being drawn to the neighborhood. Before long, Founders began to receive national attention, and the neighborhood became even busier. Now, as they pour more money into the expanded facility and watch more businesses and residents move into the neighborhood, Engbers and Stevens offer a semi joking comment about how the property values are going up. Still, they know they didn't do it alone. "We were a part of it, but not exclusive," Engbers said. "The city helped a lot, too. They threw a lot of money at the road." Development magnets are not just limited to breweries. The Founders owners pointed to the Wealthy Street corridor, where Electric Cheetah, Brick Road Pizza, The Meanwhile Bar, Sparrows Coffee Shop and other businesses helped turn the neighborhood into a thriving area. One company key to such sustainable urban development is Bear Manor Properties, a property management company that owns and operates Harmony Brewing Co. in Eastown. Harmony — and Bear Manor, in general has a special place in its business development plan for neighborhoods that could use a bit of fresh air. "We wanted to form neighborhood nexus points," Bear Manor co-owner Barry Van Dyke said. "Just a place for people to come together and help set the neighborhood's culture." In February 2012, Bear Manor owners — brothers Barry and Jackson Van Dyke and sister Heather Van Dyke - Titus — opened Harmony Brewing at 1551 Lake Drive SE, transforming an old liquor store that had sat empty for nearly 10 years. They spent nearly $300,000 on the renovation. Barry Van Dyke said the siblings like to develop properties in walkable, urban cores. Less than a year after it opened, Harmony won the Gerald R. Helmholdt Grand Award from the Neighborhood Business Alliance. It was the second straight year a brewery walked home with the award: Brewery Vivant won it in 2011. Although Brewery Vivant located in an already busy block of Cherry Street in East Hills, owners Kris and Jason Spaulding have taken on an important role as neighborhood leaders in sustainability, community engagement and charitable giving. "I definitely believe that breweries seem to have a big economic impact on revitalizing neighborhoods," said Jason Spaulding. "I even sat in on a tradeshow of real estate and economic development and downtown http://www.grbj.com/articles/78837-breweries-find-themselves-at-center-of-neighborhood-... 7/10/2017 Breweries find themselves at center of neighborhood development 12014-01-24 1 Grand R... Page 9 of 12 development professionals where they solicit breweries specifically to locate in areas where they want to bring an old neighborhood back to life. So I think that has been proven to be true and is finding traction in the real world." The city's first west -side brewery since Prohibition, The Mitten Brewing Co. took the historic Engine House No. 9 on Leonard Street NW and converted it into a fast-growing brewery. In its first year of operation, the Mitten donated nearly $30,000 to area nonprofits, despite its relatively meager output of 512 barrels of beer. The Detroit Tigers -themed brewery also recently leased the root beer stand across the street and is seeking a nearby building for a production facility in a neighborhood in need of some revitalization. While The Mitten is dedicated to the west side, it won't be the only brewery there for long. The Harmony Brewing owners took the former Little Mexico Cafe on Stocking Avenue NW out of receivership for $800,000 in November. "Before we even started thinking about financials, we were talking to the neighbors," Van Dyke said, adding they even stopped at The Mitten. "We asked if it was something they would like in the neighborhood and if it would add value." Mark Lewis, executive director at Neighborhood Ventures, said breweries don't actually serve as anchors of such urban development but do help round out the neighborhood. "When you're talking about microbreweries, they serve as an aspect," said Lewis. "They're as successful as other entertainment establishments would be. It's the same as additional retail." Although neighborhood development may not depend on the breweries, they do add a. significant cultural aspect, Lewis said. "They add a certain culture and vibrancy to the city we've never seen before," he said. "It adds to the character and vibe of neighborhoods." Like 20 1 1 weet G+1 Share ... .. ns .....at. Eva.. . Pat Evans is a Grand Rapids Business Journal staff reporter who covers real estate, construction, architecture and design, retail, beverages, technology and county government. Email Pat at pevans at grbj dot com. Follow him on Twitter (i ,patevans Recent A Articles by Pat Evans Wine rack ire uncorks lucrative venture Inside „Track: Carrying on the family business Boxed ,Water continues ria id expansion http://www.grbj .com/articles/7883 7 -breweries -find -themselves -at -center -of -neighborhood-... 7/10/2017 Breweries and economic development: A case of home brew o CED in NC Page 2 of 6 Something is brewing in small towns throughout North Carolina. Far outside the city limits of Beer City U.S.A. (also known to North Carolinians as Asheville), craft breweries are opening up in and around distressed downtowns throughout the state. Part industrial facility, part retail space, part bar/restaurant, and part real estate pioneer, craft breweries are emerging as innovative harbingers of neighborhood revitalization. Its leaders tend to break the traditional entrepreneurial mold, measuring their success not only according to profit margins but by the improvements in quality of life and neighborhood vitality that tend to follow in their wake. The case of Mother Earth Brewin4 in Kinston, a small town (population 21,667) in rural eastern North Carolina, exemplifies this pattern. At one time a thriving community with a prosperous economy based on tobacco and textile manufacturing, Kinston's downtown had seen better days as it entered the twenty-first century. The tobacco and manufacturing heyday had come and gone and the once lively downtown storefronts were mostly vacant. Those looking for some semblance of a night life had better head out of town. Fast forward to 2013 and Kinston's downtown now shows some burgeoning signs of life —lunch spots are packed by noon, folks head in and out of the shops on Herritage Street, and public art in the form of benches and bicycle racks dot the wide sidewalks. And once five o'clock hits, patrons from all over Kinston (and elsewhere) pour into Mother Earth, for locally crafted beer, fellowship, and on some nights, live music. Mother Earth Brewery Mother Earth Brewery Mother Earth isn't the only reason for this recent downtown revival, but it can certainly take some of the credit. The brewery's co-founders (and in-laws) Stephen Hill and Trent Mooring were both Kinston natives and successful local entrepreneurs who shared a home brewing hobby. They also kept an eye on Kinston real estate and were longtime admirers of a deteriorating yet beautiful downtown building that had once housed a pharmacy and a grocery store. Hill eventually decided it was time to "formalize" his pastime and go into business with his son-in-law. Thus, Mother Earth Brewing, the only Gold LEED certified brewery in the state, was born in 2008. In addition to satisfying certain criterion to serve as a manufacturing facility (size, functionality, access to quality utilities), Hill envisioned that the repurposed historic building would also be a vanguard of Kinston's downtown revitalization strategy, helping to spur private investment and renewed interest in the promising, yet struggling city center. As a "native son of Kinston", Hill was willing to take on the financial risk because of his commitment to his hometown's future. And the gamble has appeared to pay off so far — Mother Earth, which is now distributed in three states, is set to meet its production capacity in 2013 and the brewery recently obtained its distillery license. As for Kinston's downtown, several new downtown shops and restaurants have opened nearby, with several more set to open by the year's end. https://ced.sog.unc.edu/breweries-and-economic-development-a-case-of-home-brew/ 7/10/2017 Breweries and economic development: A case of home brew « CED in NC Page 3 of 6 Mother Earth's success doesn't appear to be an anomaly — other breweries across the state, like Fullsteam in Durham, Aviator Brewing in Fuquay-Varina, and Dry County Brewing Company in Spruce Pine, have each played a similar role in providing some positive momentum to areas suffering from disinvestment. There's much to be learned from their stories for local economic developers who are interested in attracting breweries to their towns in order to reap the "spillover effects" of these community -minded, innovative businesses. Because of their hybrid industrial/retail use, craft breweries require a unique blend of supportive zoning, an appropriate facility, adequate infrastructure, and local government assistance. The multiple needs of craft breweries require a delicate balance, but with planning and the right mix of ingredients, local economic developers can position their towns to develop their own "home brew". Marcia Perritt, a UNC -Chapel Hill graduate student pursuing a joint master's degree in Public Health and City and Regional Planning, is a Community Revitalization Fellow at the School of Government. Marcia Perritt (Il Posts) o The Promise of State Sector Strategies Local Food Policy Councils as Community Development Strate�4v Leave a comment ? One Response to Breweries and economic development: A case of home brew Leave a Comment NOTE - You can use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong> NAME EMAIL https:Hced.sog.unc.edu/breweries-and-economic-development-a-case-of-home-brew/ 7/10/2017 How Craft Breweries Impact Local Economies I Business Climate 5Share Page 1 of 5 INDUSTRIES LOCATIONS BLCG G -40 Blag: Entrepreneurship Economic Growth On Tape. How Breweries Impact Local Economies By CC Hutten I August 23, 2016 It's a great day to be a beer lover. There are over 4,20o breweries in the United States, and 99 percent of them are identified as craft breweries: small, independent and traditional. Craft breweries are unfolding all over the country, specifically in mid-sized cities. Not only is this delicious http://www.businessclimate.com/economic-growth-on-tap-how-breweries-impact-local-ec... 7/10/2017 How Craft Breweries Impact Local Economies I Business Climate Page 2 of 5 news for residents, it's a robust revelation for tourism from an economic development point of vi L INDUSTRIES LOCATIONS BLDG BUSINESS',' CRAFT-BREWED COMMtf NTTY Brews can be completely distinct and unique to a town's flavor. Just last year, 184 new breweries opened, and soon there will be a place for every palate in the United States. Craft brewers have distinctive, individualistic approaches to connecting with their customers. Most are willing to move into areas in need of rehabilitation, are often generous to small businesses and charities, and have a passion for specific causes, such as sustainability. The hallmark of craft beer is innovation and successful brewers possess a passion for authenticity. The beer is their brand; their brand reflects local culture. How To Balance City Growth And Livability Different from bars that serve wine and spirits alongside beer, breweries feature varying experimental versions and brands. Classified as an "attraction," breweries typically close early but still fit in with a town's food and booze scene. "You have to sell who you are as a community first and then you sell what you have," says Ben Teague, executive director of economic development in Asheville, N.C., a city that was ranked as a best beer city by our sibling site, Livability.com. "Decision makers and owners of breweries are personally invested in these communities. They want to help build the community." MORE HOPS, MORE JOBS Not just a foamy and fermented local attraction, small brewers are increasingly creating job opportunities due to the fact that they need more people at the lower production level. The beer industry provided more than 424,000 jobs — with more than 115,000 jobs directly at breweries — and contributed $55.7 billion to the U.S. economy in 2014. And that's not to mention that wages in the beer industry are among the highest of the 350 industries surveyed in the US Bureau of Labor Statistics. http://www.businessclimate. comleconomic-growth-on-tap-how-breweries-impact-local-ec... 7/10/2017 How Craft Breweries Impact Local Economies I Business Climate Page 3 of 5 Furthermore, just one job at a craft brewery will create an additional 45 jobs in other industries ' 3tss seVc09.ribu���po��o and agricul ur '. _ { Made In America: Au Naturel It goes beyond municipal economies — rural communities are forecasted to benefit from the surge of craft breweries as well. Craft -style beer uses between three and seven times as much malt per barrel as a mass market lager, and more U.S. farmers are planting hops, which create flavors that vary by region just as much as gine grapes. To learn more about craft breweries and other top industries in the U.S., on Business Climate. Published on- August 23, 2016 Updated on: August 23, 2016 YOU MAY ALSO LIKE... Tennessee Creates Big Appetite for Food Production r� i r c Tennessee's Automotive Industry is Running At Full Throttle Technology Drives Advanced Manufacturing in Gainesville Region SPONSORED BY http://www.businessclimate.com/economic-growth-on-tap-how-breweries-impact-local-ec... 7/10/2017 Breweries are the Mark of a Thriving Community Page 1 of 9 Lujw .l U� IR.� �m (https:Hsubscribe.r)csaublink.com/; Search Subi MENU ff", _7 XI be-fc8b-4b40-80ef-f706c83dc41 ALL .A D O U .T iE3EIE M A 0 A 2 1 N IE (http://allaboutbeer.com) (https://WvGfiar er/allaboutbeermaq) Advertise with Us (httr):Hallaboutbeer.com/advertise/) Subscriber Services (https://subscribe.pcs ublink.comMlosis/Cate orvLogin.aspx?pub=AABR) Retailer Services (h(tp:Hallaboutbeer.com/retailers/) +'-GIVE A GIFT (GUIDP35 SODCOC-11AE1P4D3DU916F- CC34CF 0/73 BSCRIBE.ASPX? 9/_SU SSSC@ (HTTPS://SUBSCRIBE.PCSPUBLITK liSUJ�S%RrSCRIBEFORMARPROFILE.ASPX? BREWERIES ARE THE MARK OF A THRIVING COMMUNITY All About Beer Magazine -Volume, Issue March 15, 2016 Jeff Alworth (httD:/Iallaboutbeer.com/author/ieffaIworth/) Like 5.8KTweet G+1 I BEER IN YOUR INBOX. Email Address SUBMIT http://allaboutbeer.com/breweries-thriving-communities/ 7/10/2017 Breweries are the Mark of a Thriving Community Page 2 of 9 Boneyard Brewing in Bend, Oregon. (Photo by Jeff Alworth) The writer James Fallows and his wife Deborah spent three years working on a project for The Atlantic called "American Futures (httn://americanfutures.ora/)." They traveled around the country to small and midsized towns in a single-engine airplane, hoping to get a different view of American life than we normally see reflected in the media. It culminated in a cover story (htty://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2016/03/how-america-is-nutting-itself-back- together/426882/) in this month's Atlantic, and includes a lot of insight about what makes America tick. The Fallows didn't just parachute in and talk to a few people on the streets, either. They spent weeks in 22 different cities, getting to know folks who really understand the scene at ground level. Along the way, they began to notice certain things. Following the massive recession of 2007-2008, some towns showed resilience and rebounded while others languished. After just the first dozen towns, Fallows noted that "we had developed an informal checklist of the traits that distinguished a place where things seemed to work." For the cover story, he included an eleven -item version of that list; a summary of all the markers of successful towns. "If you tell us how a town measures up based on these standards," he wrote in the introduction, "we can guess a lot of other things about it." The list includes fairly civic -oriented things like "public-private partnerships are real," and "they have, BEER IN YOUR INBOX. Email Address SUB1111T http://allaboutbeer.com/breweries-thriving-communities/ 7/10/2017 Breweries are the Mark of a Thriving Community Page 3 of 9 and care about, a community college." But then there was this last one, which appears at first glance to be unlike the others (htty://www.theatiantic.com/magazine/archive/2016/03/eleven-sipns-a- city-will-succeed/426885/). 11. They have craft breweries. One final marker, perhaps the most reliable: A city on the way back will have one or more craft breweries, and probably some small distilleries too. Until 2012, that would have been an unfair test for Mississippi, which effectively outlawed craft beers by setting maximum alcohol levels at 5 percent. Now that law has changed, and Mississippi has 10 craft breweries. Once - restrictive Utah has even more. A town that has craft breweries also has a certain kind of entrepreneur, and a critical mass of mainly young (except for me) customers. You may think I'm joking, but just try to find an exception. Fallows is definitely right here, but I'd go a step or two further. He suggests that the appearance of a craft brewery is one effect of community health—but I'd argue that it's at least in part the cause of a community's vitality. Breweries are industrial operations, and they're expensive. Beer is a mass beverage, and even making it on a brewpub scale means you have to have quite a bit of space for the brewhouse, fermentation, and storage. All that equipment costs a lot, and real estate does, too. When you're spending a quarter- or half -million dollars on equipment, you can't afford expensive commercial space. So breweries end up on the fringes, in bad parts of town where the rent is cheap. That alone is the first step of revitalization. But breweries aren't like the average industrial plant. They are people magnets, bringing folks in who are curious to try a pint of locally made IPA. In fairly short order, breweries can create little pockets of prosperity in cities that can (and often do) radiate out into the neighborhood. Pretty soon, other businesses see the bustle and consider moving in, too. It doesn't hurt that breweries often find run-down parts of towns that have great buildings. Once a brewery moves in and refurbishes an old building, it reveals the innate promise of adjacent buildings to prospective renters. RELATED: Breweries flourish in industrial narks (htty://allaboutbeer.com/breweries-flourish- in-industrial-narks/ ) When I passed through Tampa last fall, I stopped in at Hidden Springs Ale Works, a brewery that was just a few months old. It is across some invisible dividing line in a "bad" neighborhood near downtown. (It didn't seem particularly bad to me, though it was deserted by 6 p.m.) The brewpub was absolutely packed, and people were happily visiting the neighborhood to have a couple beers after work. I would bet the entire (small) sum of my BEER IN YOUR INBOX. Email Address SUb,, `t,T http://allaboutbeer.com/breweries-thriving-communities/ 7/10/2017 Breweries are the Mark of a Thriving Community bank account that within three years, the area around Hidden Springs will be thriving. That's what breweries do. But the effect may even be stronger in smaller communities. Little towns are often underserved with regard to cool places to hang out. When they open up shop, they provide much-needed social hubs. That the rent is cheaper there than in big cities gives these breweries a competitive boost, to boot—and we have seen many small towns (like Petaluma, California; Kalamazoo, Michigan; and Milton, Delaware) spawn outsized breweries. And whether they're in small towns or cities, breweries serve an important community - building function. They're not only a nice place to spend an evening, but serve as venues for Page 4 of 9 ,.. The Tropic Thunder Floridaweisse from Hidden Springs Ale Works. (Photo by John Holl) events like meetings, weddings, and even children's birthday parties. RELATED: Beer as an economic stimulus (htty://allaboutbeer.com/article/beer-as-an- economic-stimulus/) Beyond these effects, breweries offer good careers. Manufacturing jobs have been declining for decades (down 28 percent in 20 years), but brewing is one of the few sectors within manufacturing showing growth. There aren't a ton of jobs where you don't need a college degree, but at a brewery you can work in a satisfying environment for a cool company. Nationally, breweries directiv emplov 115,000 people(httvs://www.brewersassociation.ora/statistics/economic-imvact-data/) (including accountants, marketers, brewpub staff, etc.)—an impressive figure by any measure. And unlike so many jobs in manufacturing, it's a lot harder to offshore brewing. So, I think the Fallows are right: having a local brewery or five is the sign of prosperity. But the reason breweries appear in thriving towns and cities isn't accidental—they're an important reason those towns are thriving in the first place. JeffAlworth is the author of the book, The Beer Bible (htty://www.amazon.com/Beer-Bible- Essential-Lovers-Guide/du/0761168117/ref=sr 1 5? ie=UTF8&ciid=1422111715&sr=8-5&kevwords=Teff+Alworth) (Workman, 2015). Follow him on Twitter (httvs://twitter.com/Beervana) or find him at his blog Beervana (httu://beervana.blogsuot.com/). Editor's note: James Fallows has responded to the above post with his own over at The Atlantic (htty://www.theatlantic.com/notes/all/2015/ 10/the-american-futures-blog/411148/#note- 476220). BEER IN YOUR INBOX. Email Address SUB101T http://allaboutbeer.com/breweries-thriving-communities/ 7/10/2017 CIikdo 0F M( CITY COUNCIL CONNECTION JULY 24, 2017 HI -WAY LIQUORS Sales through June 30, 2017 Attached are schedules and charts for total sales in each major sales category through the end of June 2017. Hi -Way Liquors Sales Report 6/30/2017 Total Sales Month 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Jan $ 249,670.43 $ 316,280.10 $ 300,631.85 $ 296,838.64 $ 302,114.52 $ 328,004.13 $ 355,029.76 $ 380,425.45 $ 364,675.32 $ 356,295.18 Feb 255,440.36 284,988.38 285,584.50 315,239.00 307,385.41 337,923.99 333,487.18 347,777.77 362,746.98 364,836.39 Mar 295,257.14 318,050.39 324,062.21 335,032.60 388,195.21 408,071.17 377,391.62 388,003.16 401,256.91 417,005.50 Apr 281,365.81 346,738.34 369,112.88 389,543.24 347,321.09 388,395.50 389,250.82 421,280.89 428,729.44 448,141.63 May 377,177.10 384,337.08 399,489.67 409,309.12 433,829.01 436,195.21 498,095.67 523,401.05 482,917.95 503,867.81 Jun 350,727.93 381,782.23 377,458.15 409,726.07 461,423.68 440,255.04 426,392.73 474,203.81 470,585.33 521,559.76 Jul 409,870.50 430,838.23 466,122.69 466,738.15 447,452.18 485,459.76 479,174.06 542,973.27 527,519.46 - Aug 409,575.96 383,523.07 386,245.30 408,734.83 445,158.94 503,181.84 484,955.71 470,505.22 462,669.36 Sep 317,846.07 346,900.80 346,557.62 373,719.64 390,399.33 379,381.19 397,495.82 439,444.29 448,218.93 Oct 351,268.98 360,742.04 375,367.40 365,702.14 372,676.23 396,328.87 409,967.74 460,096.82 454,442.30 Nov 332,605.88 341,875.49 360,661.96 376,855.40 421,960.12 424,038.37 465,299.53 474,241.74 444,533.08 Dec 436,379.03 454,982.63 485,617.01 505,482.70 527,865.36 518,379.58 549,200.76 569,707.38 605,509.16 Total $4,067,185.19 $4,351,038.78 $4,476,911.24 $4,652,921.53 $4,845,781.08 $5,045,614.65 $5,165,741.40 $5,492,060.85 $ 5,453,804.22 $ 2,611,706.27 Change $ 283,853.59 $ 125,872.46 $ 176,010.29 $ 192,859.55 $ 199,833.57 $ 120,126.75 $ 326,319.45 $ (38,256.63) $(2,842,097.95) Change % 7.0% 2.9% 3.9% 4.1% 4.1% 2.4% 6.3% -0.7% -52.1% $700,000 $600,000 $500,000 $400,000 $300,000 $200,000 $100,000 oil Jan Feb ■ Mar Apr Monthly Hi -Way Sales May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct ■ 2008 ■ 2009 ■ 2010 ■ 2011 ■ 2012 ■ 2013 ■ 2014 2015 2016 ■ 2017 Nov Dec CYM-LYM Y -T -D -2.3% -2.3% 0.6% -0.9% 3.9% 0.8% 4.5% 1.9% 4.3% 2.4% 10.8% 4.0% Hi -Way Liquors Sales Report 6/30/2017 Beer Month 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 CYM-LYM Y -T -D Jan $ 122,218.36 $ 157,849.78 $ 146,246.32 $ 143,906.08 $ 149,406.45 $ 160,903.32 $ 173,814.13 $ 191,370.26 $ 176,483.68 $ 174,846.99 -0.9% -0.9% Feb 121,734.33 137,055.23 140,624.54 150,075.08 150,589.28 162,865.75 161,168.63 164,508.11 175,055.27 179,346.12 2.5% 0.8% Mar 138,889.05 155,196.13 164,157.70 163,595.55 203,957.25 192,607.52 185,325.68 192,955.79 199,141.66 208,926.70 4.9% 2.3% Apr 146,613.65 178,834.20 189,978.23 194,504.16 179,486.77 186,134.31 198,195.77 219,756.39 228,133.10 234,069.51 2.6% 2.4% May 201,232.14 210,097.48 223,678.47 208,963.65 227,664.73 234,738.30 256,188.77 259,306.91 250,403.11 262,275.25 4.7% 2.9% Jun 193,801.97 207,793.83 206,043.42 224,769.03 259,671.21 243,389.79 238,322.11 263,421.95 263,264.15 296,531.85 12.6% 4.9% Jul 226,317.96 229,199.79 260,971.50 258,734.60 253,648.64 273,319.54 265,555.32 301,867.65 296,513.68 - Aug 226,653.65 203,222.86 211,996.32 216,546.53 242,179.20 281,577.25 267,802.95 253,141.21 250,255.41 Sep 166,679.60 183,586.32 183,865.70 199,170.24 208,974.88 202,213.80 211,854.94 233,215.56 238,333.55 Oct 176,382.34 179,873.10 190,893.27 180,043.06 187,386.57 191,764.20 210,454.13 234,882.09 224,253.93 Nov 158,322.50 154,584.13 168,265.14 171,866.27 195,276.37 192,162.71 202,081.91 207,055.40 213,333.23 Dec 187,691.06 190,655.19 203,080.13 216,560.71 224,952.83 217,491.21 234,178.12 241,996.27 253,223.11 Total $2,066,536.61 $2,187,948.04 $2,289,800.74 $2,328,734.96 $2,483,194.18 $2,539,167.70 $2,604,942.46 $2,763,477.59 $ 2,768,393.88 $ 1,355,996.42 Change $ 121,411.43 $ 101,852.70 $ 38,934.22 $ 154,459.22 $ 55,973.52 $ 65,774.76 $ 158,535.13 $ 4,916.29 $(1,412,397.46) Change % 5.9% 4.7% 1.7% 6.6% 2.3% 2.6% 6.1% 0.2% -51.0% $350,000 $300,000 $250,000 $200,000 $150,000 $100,000 $50,000 FI Jan Feb Mar Monthly Beer Sales Apr May Jun ■ 2008 ■ 2009 ■ 2010 ■ 2011 ■ 2012 ■ 2013 ■ 2014 ■ 2015 ■ 2016 Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec ■2017 Hi -Way Liquors Sales Report 6/30/2017 Liquor Month 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 CYM-LYM Y -T -D Jan $ 73,930.87 $ 92,370.42 $ 91,472.50 $ 91,279.01 $ 93,085.69 $ 103,977.89 $ 113,943.25 $ 118,577.85 $ 118,211.20 $ 114,509.99 -3.1% -3.1% Feb 74,261.89 83,513.27 85,484.92 96,541.21 92,489.93 106,387.16 107,609.55 112,198.85 113,060.59 117,361.15 3.8% 0.3% Mar 78,870.42 88,569.65 93,133.42 101,047.04 112,244.43 124,487.55 116,316.49 118,269.49 118,839.79 131,238.09 10.4% 3.7% Apr 76,735.80 90,627.19 95,025.54 110,898.81 98,080.67 113,594.37 115,579.47 123,841.34 126,073.89 130,114.53 3.2% 3.6% May 103,409.29 102,041.75 106,395.62 111,586.59 114,299.35 127,622.31 135,370.38 140,116.66 129,009.36 142,237.28 10.3% 5.0% Jun 91,805.81 103,580.02 102,086.20 115,136.72 128,604.32 124,019.90 120,291.71 136,716.81 135,763.26 147,813.59 8.9% 5.7% Jul 105,782.85 118,883.98 122,861.98 130,624.19 123,672.73 139,270.04 139,967.77 155,436.54 150,173.35 - Aug 106,489.25 103,977.01 101,487.43 113,869.37 126,065.14 141,197.73 138,660.76 136,440.40 135,841.14 Sep 88,448.34 94,335.50 94,528.17 103,373.64 109,153.56 107,605.71 115,119.19 129,195.42 130,101.01 Oct 97,046.60 102,236.90 102,983.14 103,533.14 106,326.73 116,677.74 124,271.15 140,198.97 128,290.50 Nov 97,348.39 90,996.73 102,298.02 105,501.75 120,127.29 126,412.24 134,241.85 132,261.11 134,208.12 Dec 135,221.23 143,684.12 153,690.60 159,717.50 172,370.96 175,523.36 184,746.26 190,944.24 205,335.83 - Total $1,129,350.74 $1,214,816.54 $1,251,447.54 $1,343,108.97 $1,396,520.80 $1,506,776.00 $1,546,117.83 $1,634,197.68 $ 1,624,908.04 $ 783,274.63 Change $ 85,465.80 $ 36,631.00 $ 91,661.43 $ 53,411.82 $ 110,255.21 $ 39,341.83 $ 88,079.85 $ (9,289.64) $ (841,633.41) Change % 7.6% 3.0% 7.3% 4.0% 7.9% 2.6% 5.7% -0.6% -51.8% Monthly Liquor Sales $250,000 $200,000 $150,000 $100,000 $50,000 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct im- Nov Dec ■ 2008 ■ 2009 ■ 2010 ■ 2011 ■ 2012 ■ 2013 ■ 2014 2015 2016 ■ 2017 Hi -Way Liquors Sales Report 6/30/2017 Wine Month 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Jan $ 30,700.42 $ 41,810.19 $ 43,324.18 $ 48,437.59 $ 50,238.83 $ 54,949.83 $ 59,391.16 $ 61,128.65 $ Feb 33,407.17 39,410.85 42,230.84 52,847.05 54,642.27 60,573.12 57,228.51 62,600.47 Mar 47,603.93 45,525.38 46,165.18 54,639.16 57,735.22 77,810.58 66,425.24 67,121.51 Apr 31,755.42 48,303.48 61,146.04 62,289.18 57,973.74 79,736.19 63,101.05 63,285.56 May 38,522.75 40,963.86 45,733.08 68,701.95 78,740.40 62,491.07 92,083.62 109,512.94 Jun 31,796.95 37,522.00 44,211.14 49,089.65 56,607.74 59,523.15 54,270.56 59,036.14 Jul 36,909.44 41,813.65 48,334.93 49,664.45 54,467.20 57,115.44 57,743.98 66,029.11 Aug 35,932.62 41,333.00 46,871.28 53,172.68 61,825.30 64,057.61 62,446.04 63,546.01 Sep 33,830.69 39,798.20 47,859.52 53,916.37 60,317.17 59,121.12 59,409.30 62,210.27 Oct 45,750.04 48,422.79 58,081.87 60,949.40 66,423.82 75,606.28 63,659.41 70,038.32 Nov 50,106.64 66,331.86 71,928.30 85,933.28 97,249.52 96,824.40 117,402.23 122,947.90 Dec 75,866.80 84,285.84 101,676.19 109,267.01 116,610.70 113,008.24 115,617.50 120,274.96 Total $ 492,182.87 $ 575,521.10 $ 657,562.55 $ 748,907.77 $ 812,831.91 $ 860,817.03 $ 868,778.60 $ 927,731.84 $ Change $ 83,338.23 $ 82,041.45 $ 91,345.22 $ 63,924.14 $ 47,985.12 $ 7,961.57 $ 58,953.24 $ Change % 16.9% 14.3% 13.9% 8.5% 5.9% 0.9% 6.8% $140,000 $120,000 $100,000 $80,000 $60,000 $40,000 $20,000 Jan Feb Mar Apr Monthly Wine Sales 2016 2017 CYM-LYM Y -T -D 60,454.56 $ 57,275.16 -5.3% -5.3% 64,797.38 58,664.45 -9.5% -7.4% 71,840.82 64,286.75 -10.5% -8.6% 61,268.24 69,415.79 13.3% -3.4% 87,333.35 82,724.29 -5.3% -3.9% 54,889.39 58,623.08 6.8% -2.4% 60,750.62 - 60,015.78 65,294.31 89,005.29 83,896.45 129,536.28 - 889,082.47 $ 390,989.52 (38,649.37) $ (498,092.95) -4.2% -56.0% 11 11111 911 j#iJI May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec ' ■ 2008 ■ 2009 ■ 2010 ■ 2011 I ■ 2012 IF ■ 2013 ■ 2014 2015 2016 ■ 2017 $6.0 $5.5 $5.0 c $4.5 $4.0 $3.5 $3.0 Liquor Store Sales - Rolling 12 Month Periods J N N — O 3 N N — O J E1 w O J E1 w — O 3 N N — O 3 N w O J 91 91 O 3 d d — O 3 d d lD O N N W A V1 Ol V CITY OF �01 kdo COUNCIL CONNECTION JULY 24, 2017 MONTICELLO COMMUNITY CENTER (MCC) Building Improvements This month we completed the new drinking fountain installation across from the City and MCC offices. This new unit features a bottle filler. Picture below: Transactions and visits Year to date (6.30.17), the MCC processed 57,627 transactions, 7,120 less than this time last year. The MCC year to date revenue is $793,433, a decrease of $22,223 from the same time last year. Program revenues are down this year due to Group Fitness classes now being included with the membership. Year to date membership visits are 76,401 total visits, which is 2,064 visits down from last year. MCC memberships are at a total of 5,678 active individual members. Council Connection - 7/24/17 F Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q O m cO Q Q Q Q Q Q f+ Q Q Q Q R Q Q Q Q Q N O Q Q QQQQQQQQQQmQO H Ln o L-QO - O mmu']o OQLn QQLn QQQQm-moon O QQ C] Ln C] LO �� � M r � S} Ln j+ O (O M o li] m 0 0 d LnL r M o L+r Ln I+ Ln N L+ 7 N cW m cVNr orf+-f+-MNt Ln Ln mLa mm4-* mLn NM rLO m�N r r- m �Nu']NN�MN Ln I+r[V 1+ Nm in V) LU W 0 W z W 1 0 W J F m C W g W W z W W u7 ul C¢1] CO Y LLI j W W FFO a' W JOGS oLL mLLI i W W W as zwF W zw LLL w W a C W�O 0 W (IS��C U) W Q a' a' W �:U W 0}cDW WUc-FFO W F U z z C) C; 0 LL), = �_���L CO F W D dJF FF LL z — LL] o O r N e O u', ea M1 G+ Q+ r O O_ O d Y J W m 0¢F W J FBF r N M1 o fL N1 IO O N O„ N� r O V 0 xW �W W a'aa021Dz0 zd] W W W JW0 W S cri[17[fi LJj} x •aooeoca000�-)oe(3o rW� NLA Wu7 u?u7 u}u7 u7�������O � W Y+- m- - - - - - - m - - -w- Lp M u5 F O L JLy M- N-- u7 - R- o yy [n - Q- rLL� M m j+ --m u,- -Tr cV -ep- Q eq M N- 14 m [o r [v 0 m m m- u9 - m Ln ---M N- r co Ln ry_mo N N N Q z Ln -TF m - r - m m m me.� o ��yy Ln m w m L-: R R r ry l- N r rN r N N ;2 rCV NCV m rso CV m � �m Mir r W STN r m F co 7 o op W o o ro M R o M M Vi u -i o o op IN T R M m o oc=;�_;0000000�=:0000 c-, c���s�c3+�+�•��os��ooa m--14 rn L+ -[O f+M mrnm LfSm mun Y+Ln--N m1+1+ u', m -t Lo cfi � 2 m omm-L+ro-Nm-m-L+1 � � Ln Lti mLnmmNm�j+[oMm-Ln II]j+m MO � to -- p�Q rNr Ln mm of -a VC]M uf'u r m rNN —7 m- ' ww ..., Lo `-7 L7 N-m�NNmTNmm f+mNcO- QNM O-mLnNNMmryQ eq ry MmM[orMmNLnrN�NwMj+Lnm m �NNQrLn mQ Ln f+MmmLnN - O NN m W QLL]NOrNmm SONmQm cz cp QQMc! Ln Lr m- Nm 4 �2 W m LC] LL] N-Lp - - — O M m j+ LC] In m m N m ry m Ln N N r iO m cO rn r N M m N v M M r Ln r u'S r M Ln r n N N Q } 1- w F W MQ QN Ln M mLn Nm m p Ip Ip m Q iR N M Q O Ln Q Q n Q m Ln j+N M�M�+Nm mO R jr+ W m f M m m m R N LCi ui mm _ p r,Ln NOcc Ir-- mo u']m ep- LL] L+ M a c m o N L[i m N N 6n N -t M cc 1� rrrno 4 V Ln l+rnmoNr'7 r; O m i+ V L[7 iO LrI V Rl T T a1 r o Ni M1 QQ t N C ry F N r r m N op m ti m m m- r r N r N r r M j� N } W COLON Nr1+o �+m o Nrnta Ln m �R LLnnMMmo o2 Ntfl l+tfl Ln m v N Mj+ n C= Lo - Lo l+ �mN- mom - mus r m -Ln u_ Ln- m- m LLS- Lh u7 NLO nSMN� Lomm� -m m M-m-Yw M M -m in N N� m o r W ft _n m14NN M j+u�m N�7� T T y W ti M rn N 1+ N rn r o m M o m co u5 m N rn j+ o Ln o co N 1+ m m ILS �h mm N mm mmMwm o'N cQ � cq N- mLn Lo �+u5rrmmN r cx 17 zF N m mil+ N Cl co LLS Ln m T rLL] M N mN r r� rvM - c N 7 y N m r Q Ci T N r o T W N o--------------0- o -`g wF w o -N om om Ln Lnom uq u5 040 o u'] N m m o mr+Ln Ln I+Mo�v_ 0 N T oN o o u o o Ln-io -Lnn o o o o N MLnM rLn �+�+ N mo Ln 0 00 ti o0LC7 mI+Cy w� f+L+MLn rLnM j+Mj+rMj+rN[o Ln _u'10- m Ln m m N Lo LnOOMLnMmrTMj+RTmr -MN Ip ILLS] r F m F Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q O m cO Q Q Q Q Q Q f+ Q Q Q Q R Q Q Q Q Q N O Q Q QQQQQQQQQQmQO H Ln o L-QO - O mmu']o OQLn QQLn QQQQm-moon O QQ C] Ln C] LO �� � M r � S} Ln j+ O (O M o li] m 0 0 d LnL r M o L+r Ln I+ Ln N L+ 7 N cW m cVNr orf+-f+-MNt Ln Ln mLa mm4-* mLn NM rLO m�N r r- m �Nu']NN�MN Ln I+r[V 1+ Nm in V) LU W 0 W z W 1 0 W J F m C W g W W z W W u7 ul C¢1] CO Y LLI j W W FFO a' W JOGS oLL mLLI i W W W as zwF W zw LLL w W a C W�O 0 W (IS��C U) W Q a' a' W �:U W 0}cDW WUc-FFO W F U z z C) C; 0 LL), = �_���L CO F W D dJF FF LL z — LL] O_ O d Y J W m 0¢F W J FBF W UJ 0 xW �W W a'aa021Dz0 zd] W W W JW0 W S cri[17[fi LJj} x W W W W W W W W W UJ W O m a� a p U U U U U U U rW� NLA Wu7 u?u7 u}u7 u7�������O � v'�'_ W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W U] 2— O JJ J J J J U] LL U- Li] 07 LL 07 a' J W W W W W W W W W W W W W a F S �—_j U aF F W F O L y y� W W W W W W W O O O O O O O W z W w 0 0 0 0 0 0 W W W W W W W a l S W 0 0 x q 0 FLAHERTY HOOD P.A Greg Pruszinske City Administrator and Coalition of Utility Cities President City of Becker 12060 Sherburne Avenue Becker, MN 55308 June 28, 2017 Dear Mr. Pruszinske, From July 2017 to date, the Coalition of Utility Cities addressed a number of different issues. We worked with Legislators and investor owned utility representatives on electric generation tax reform; we worked on the Xcel Energy Integrated Resource Plan with its proposal to close Sherco I and Sherco If and the resulting legislation for a gas plant in Becker; we tracked changes in the regulations regarding clean air and power plants, and monitored related legislation in Minnesota. Electric Generation Tax Reform In 2015, then Minnesota Senate Tax Chair Rod Skoe (D -Clearbrook) introduced legislation overhauling the way Minnesota taxes electric generation. This reform stalled in 2016 due to the complexity of the issue. In November, 2016, Senator Skoe lost his bid for re-election. However, the Coalition of Utility Cities, a coalition of providers, and Minnesota House Representatives continued to work on tax reform. On our behalf, Rep. Jim Newberger (R -Becker), introduced the Skoe bill as HF1815. Shortly thereafter, House Tax Chair Rep. Greg Davids (R -Preston) introduced a bill reflecting the work of the utility coalition. This bill was HF1985. The Senate Tax Chair introduced the companion, SF2193. The bill reflects the utilities' efforts to eliminate the unitary valuation method for property taxes levied against their assets in Minnesota. The House Job Growth and Energy Affordability Committee held an informational hearing on HF1985 where the author declared that the reform "has to work for the Department of Revenue, host cities and the utilities." The Senate did not take any action on the reform bill. The Coalition of Utility Cities held a telephone conference call after this hearing. While the CUC had supported the Skoe reforms, this bill differed enough that the group had serious reservations. Concerns included lack of information on the effect of the plant's tax capacity, a decrease in the valuation based on spent nuclear fuel storage, whetherthe adjustment factor would increase over time or fluctuate both up and down, and what the overall transition aid cost would be to the State. Lobbyists Bradley Peterson and Carolyn Jackson met with Rep. Newberger and Rep. Jason Metsa (D - Virginia) to chart a strategy for the reform. Other House members from CUC districts expressed support for host cities but were unable to attend. The members agreed that the bill should not progress until the Department of Revenue and House fiscal staff could provide valuation numbers for analysis. In letters shortly thereafter, Chair Davids and Minnesota Department of Revenue Commissioner Cynthia Bauerly agreed that analysis of this tax reform should wait until after the 2017 legislative session. As of this letter, the staff has not completed its work in gathering the data it needs to estimate valuations underHF1985. Closing of Sherco I and Sherco II In its 2015 revised Integrated Resource Plan (IRP), Xcel Energy announced plans to close the Sherco I and Sherco II plants prior to the expiration of their operating licenses. Lobbyist Carolyn Jackson accompanied the City of Becker to the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) hearings on this IRP. The revised 2015 IRP planned for increased renewable energy and a natural gas plant of approximately 750 mW. Xcel envisioned locating this gas plant in Becker. The argument before the PUC was 1. Whether the plant should be located in Becker and 2. Whether a gas plant of that size was needed or renewable energy and purchases of hydro -electric power could instead be the replacement source of energy. State law requires utilities to investigate replacing fossil fuel generation with renewable energy where possible. The order issued by the PUC ultimately increased the amount of renewable energy for Xcel to produce and left the issue of the gas plant subject to a certificate of need process. Consequently, Rep. Newberger and Senator Andrew Mathews (R-Milaca) heard concern from Becker about the uncertainty caused by this certificate of need process. In response, they authored a bill to bypass the certificate of need process and approve the natural gas plant for Becker. Flaherty and Hood lobbyists followed this bill on behalf of the Coalition of Utility Cities, watching in particular for the legislative response to community needs when coal plants close. The bills passed through the Legislature with bi-partisan support. After meeting with community members from Becker and Sherburne County, the Governor signed the bill into law. Other Public Utilities Commission Issues Similarly, the PUC issued an order approving Minnesota Power's 2015 Integrated Resource Plan. In this order, Minnesota Power must close Boswell 1 and 2 (130mW total) by 2022. Xcel's next IRP is due in February, 2019. In this integrated resource plan, Xcel will need to address the futures of Prairie Island in Red Wing, Monticello and Allen S. King in Oak Park Heights. As a result of the changing landscape of electric generation in Minnesota, Carolyn Jackson and Greg Pruszinske have been working on documenting Becker's response to the closing power plants and creating a model workplan for other CUC communities to address the changes to their communities as a result of the closing of electric generation plants. Clean Power Plan Regulation As the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency began its planning for the federal Clean Power Plan, lobbyists Carolyn Jackson and Bradley Peterson reached out to the MPCA about stakeholder input into the process. MPCA had created a stakeholder group to consolidate concerns about the Clean Power Plan. This group did not address community impact of plant closings, but it would have been part of the agenda going forward. With the new president, the Clean Power Plan essentially was cancelled. Governor Dayton, however, pledged to continue to pursue reduction of greenhouse gas emissions in the Minnesota. MPCA has put its stakeholder group on hold for the present; however, they will contact CUC when future meetings are planned. Newly Elected Officials After the November elections, Carolyn Jackson made city visits to Monticello and Oak Park Heights to update the City Councils on CUC activities. These presentations also included basic information about electric generation equipment tax and the history of CUC. She, Shane Zahrt and Loren Solberg met with all CUC legislators during the 2017 session with this background information. Currently elected officials all voiced support for host communities in these meetings. Thank you for choosing Flaherty & Hood, P.A. for your government relation services. We look forward to continuing to represent the Coalition of Utility Cities on legislative and regulatory issues to come. Best regards, FLAHERTY & HOOD, P.A. CarolyFr ackson Senior Lobbyist •,! • ►Ell OMEN Becker • Cohasset • Granite Falls • Hoyt Lakes • Monticello • Oak Park Heights • Red Wing 2017 Annual Meeting Wednesday, June 28, 2017 10:00 a.m. —12:00 p.m. Offices of Flaherty & Hood, P.A. 525 Park Street, Suite 470 St. Paul, MN 55103-2139 AGENDA 1. Welcome and Introductions; Approval of Agenda and Minutes (Greg Pruszinske) 2. Review of 2016-2017 Activities (Bradley Peterson, Carolyn Jackson) 3. Update on economic development and other changes in Becker (Greg Pruszinske) 4. Next steps (Carolyn Jackson, Chris Henjum) 5. Treasurers Report (Marshall Hallock) 6. Adoption of 2017-2018 Policy Positions, Work Plan and Budget (All) 7. Adoption of Member Assessments (All) 8. Election of Officers for 2017-2018 (All) 9. Authorization of President to Execute 2017-2018 Contract with Flaherty & Hood, P.A. 10. Update on Plant Activity from Members (All) 11. Other Business 12, Adjourn Coalition of Utility Cities Pre -Session Meeting December 8, 2016 Draft Meeting Minutes Present: Jeff O'Neill, Rick Hendrickson, Marshall Hallock, Kay Kuhlman, Mary McComber (by phone), Mark Skelton (by phone), Max Peters (by phone), Greg Hagy (by phone) Crystal Johnson (by phone), David Smiglewski (by phone) Bradley Peterson, Carolyn Jackson and Chris Henjum. Coalition Vice President Jeff O'Neill called the meeting to order at 10:00 a.m. Members introduced themselves. Mary McComber moved approval of the annual meeting minutes. Rick Hendrickson seconded the motion. Minutes approved. Carolyn Jackson gave an election update, pointing out the change in power in the Senate. Most notably is the loss of Senator Rod Skoe, who has been a champion for the Coalition of Utility Cities. She also went through the new names of legislators for member cities. Then members gave an update in changes to their mayors and city councils. While a number of officials are newly elected, many of them have served previously on member councils. Bradley Peterson pointed out that while we know the tax committee chairs, at the time of the meeting we do not know who will be serving on the House and Senate tax committees. Carolyn then went through a draft handout designed to educate newcomers about the Coalition of Utility Cities. Members made helpful suggestions. Carolyn explained the use of the piece is both for new legislators as well as new city council members. The group then discussed lobbying strategy. Chris Henjum reported that he will have new tax capacity numbers from the Department of Revenue shortly, and will get an updated figure on electric generation taxes for our cities. Bradley and Carolyn reported to the group about a meeting with Xcel Energy. Xcel seems to be interested in continuing work on electric generation tax reform and will be meeting with other utilities. The utilities would like to see tax reform hold utilities harmless in the change. After the discussion, the group agreed that CUC should continue working on electric generation tax reform. The expectation is that we will continue to work with Xcel and the utilities before making a big push with legislators, given the complexity of the issue and the number of freshmen legislators. Rick Hendrickson reported that Rep. Newberger would be interested in carrying the legislation; however, Rep. Newberger would only push the legislation if House Tax Chair Davids would be willing to see it advance. Rick Hendrickson then gave an update on the Public Utilities Commission hearing on Xcel's 15 year integrated resource plan. Xcel will close Sherco II in 2023 and Sherco I in 2026. Xcel will undergo a certificate of need process to prove it needs an approximately 700 mW natural gas plant in Becker as part of this plan. The PUC indicated that Xcel's next integrated resource plan in 2018 will address the future of the Prairie Island plant in Red Wing, the Monticello Nuclear facility and the King plant in Oak Park Heights. Max Peters then gave an update about Minnesota Power's plans in Cohasset. Minnesota Power plans to close Boswell I and 2 in 2018. These two plants have a total capacity of 130 mW. Carolyn then gave an update on a couple of other issues she has been following. First, on the extraction of rare earth metals from coal ash, she asked the University of Minnesota whetherthey would be interested in researching ways of doing this economically. The University responded that other schools are doing this, and they did not seem interested. Kay Kuhlman pointed out that reclamation of metal from ash in Red Wing faced neighborhood opposition. Although there is no real impact on health, there is a perception that dust will harm people. Carolyn also pointed out that the State has a commission looking at the health impacts of air pollution. Rick Hendrickson said he had a list of people who were serving on this "environmental health tracking' board. Carolyn gave a brief update on the Clean Power Plan, saying the litigation over the EPA's power to issue the rule is still in the courts, and the Trump administration may not be able to repeal it very quickly. Then members gave plant updates. In Becker, they are being proactive in response to the closing of Sherco I and II. They have met with the Chamber of Commerce and Xcel to share information and options. Becker is working on projects in their industrial park and uses for the rail spur near the plants. Xcel is actively partnering with the city in these efforts. Becker is also participating in a river crossing coalition for a local utility crossing of the river between 1-94 and Highway 10. They are also addressing commercial blight on the First Street Corridor. In Red Wing, Xcel is undertaking an investigation of life cycle investments. The study is due in June, 2018. Xcel has left the decision whether to close or upgrade the Prairie Island facility to the Public Utilities Commission. The capital outlay would roughly equal the savings in operations if the upgrades are made. In Monticello, they are also participating in land use discussions about transportation across the Mississippi River. In Granite Falls, there are continuing rumors about removing the idled plant, but nothing public. The cost of removing the facility is estimated at approximately $12 -15 million. In Cohasset, the Public Utility Commission has approved a plan to close Boswell 1 and 2 in 2018. This did not come as a surprise to the community. They are anticipating a 1/3, 1/3, 1/3 approach to be coal, natural gas and renewables. There is no news about the discussion of a new plant in Cohasset. Mayors Skelton and McComber had left the call for other commitments, so there was no update of Hoyt Lakes and Oak Park Heights. Other legislative areas Carolyn will be monitoring include rail capacity and safety and solar siting. Jeff O'Neill pointed out that community solar projects can no longer be "daisy chained" to create large sites, so the land use threat has been abated. Marshall Hallock pointed out that we should watch the discussion of spent nuclear fuel at the national level as Nevada Senator Harry Reid is retiring and the EPA leadership is changing. Senator Reid had been a strong opponent to the Yucca Mountain nuclear waste project. Carolyn then asked communities whether they would like a city visit. She will be in contact with members about possible times. There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 11:55 a.m. Respectfully submitted, Carolyn Jackson Flaherty & Hood, P.A. Ll c T� C) N c 0 4� W O UI (1/ U O cn n - -_ m O N -0 a) X • cn C L O a) m a)N N m O o c n O cu N Co U •- - O cuU E U U w 0 I- ti I- o J x fuF I& m 0 A, u CE O E O z .S� a) a) 4— O O a) E .U) 0 .992 E 0 0 U Z) U .C: 0 U 0 a O A, u m FZ <k un C L L Y J M L 4-1O U .V O O(6 U O -� cn 0 0 U) a) CU 00 ago E� o U. C:U O a� _ •° o p L ,(n O �o cnW ~ > O N .. � _ � _ 4-1 U) O cn cu.- 0 E-�w. N C:.0 O cn m L c .O O .� 0 � D 00 0 � o °o � o L .� a)U) CD -c: C: D U. U o C;) 0 42 ..,_, c _fu T O C O AR x L Q 0 0. ia Q. 00 CY) LL 1 LJ O U •- U_ O O - 4-0 a) C N Oo N +-0 C: N � O E _ • aI / m I 4— \0 �/ i O O O ME (� — O � L �_ l^ i • • � U O 'L U N _ C: -I .- O E E M"o .a:' Lu 4-J O N m N c6 U O 42 O 4-1m Ll E O 4-- ♦-1 a U) x 1 O O to O U co c 70 - co O _ a)O O c� �00 O V 4-1� U) ♦--' O as (ate ��•� � N c 4-1 a) U V O Q U Z -0 Z (0 (.5 Z) N m N c6 U O 42 O 4-1m Ll E O 4-- U U C: ■ O O i cn a --i a — 0 � � a) U N U Q N U) U) O U � x U) N _ a ca. — ♦--' a 4— O � � U o U o C: 0 moi/ O i cn a --i a — 0 0 a) U U m 0 ■ • ui _>11 C6 m L. O 0 a) .5 co co O m U E 0 O 42 Q E _O O 0 0 m 4-a ifs • E he a cn .Ie N m � O a) U D U a O Li c L c F Q a i. O O O .c U � .. a) +& � E > O C) ._ N p -0 O N � O C O Q. N O +� O0 ��--+ ,..j O NO N .L E � a)� a) U UO cm0 a cu cn •— N }' > � .U) a) �— O Z O p O N (1) V X 0� U CL z o z Z 70 0 m 0 2 0 4-1 0 AM W O . U) U) . E E O U 0 0 0 a) m E 0 ai. m 4-1 0 4-1 c� a) cm .O cn a) cn 6741 W 4-1 m E O �. 0 E I; 0 U O 0 51 Li c L c F O U 0 m E 0 4— a c� E -f-_� cn a) x ru 4-J c .-J U) X 4, z U) .U) L. O 4-- cn Q. U D U O O CD cn E a) E cn H O L O O O U a) U) a� Q. N 0 U O .0 a. U U) N •O U) .E E O U i ml 0 .N 0 2) O O O CL AR .D co U a) E E O U O a) Ii 4--a _0 Q O a� D, CD E CD U D a. m O O AA R �i (o O 0 U a) L. E E 0 0 N U) (6 m C6 Q. m 0) 0 CL Q. m LOW 0 a W 70 ca N U O 00 U O .C: a� U N m N Z U X 0 ►. U) c� N E 0 E E O U .12 cn 0 N E O) M 4- O - U U N O -� V) >1QCo 4� 'E m ca E c: EE E o o O > U U O ._ > 0)> M O .� — O ca E cn-cm 7o (D o�� � Q. �� 0 _� Q m U U 4—j O cn .� U) V � _� m Q> o - V - L ..0 E co O N E a --J �_ p .O C '0 ra '0 cn O — a O Q. LL. — O � — cn X� C: � X U O o — o � '— o z2�.,U 0 1bli .cn O 0. O cn O CL L U U .cn 0 U) cm 0 Ab Co" C) 0.. L U U 0 42 a) 0 W W O .0 O U M Q O a) O .c Z _U) _ ca N E._ O c: fu -'-' O 0 U N N O � O C)..Q >%.C: .� (6 -f--j O U Z U. O O a. 0 c>1 Q U a. 2i 0 U 2 LO c O 0 N U O 0) .EZ a) a) E O O Jc a) co U) O Q � O U � :3 '0 O C: U) N m D O p ~ U (� Z J C � N Vm co c o L p Z om U .Lco � (u Ou) E co >, ~ W m O� O O �' O cooco cm c o 4J U a) m c� O z A, 4-- O U O E cn U c� c 0 U c L C: O E O 4- 0 0 X Co O U cn cu cu � � O cu cn _� U (u -� U � 2 O ._ _U � O C� /� a. L M n ' W L O cnO Q cu C U) O ---j F 0. c L X z m a) C= O cn .U) C%. cn CU cn Ca X m •U V E 0 2 e i e L' O <k LL n C il L- c RWOMWISM • 1�/ a MMMM�Mqnaq ■ ■ ::%Ittai4lin Toolbox for Communities Facing a Post -Plant Era This is a series of initial questions designed to help communities understand their assets and stakeholders, in order to face challenges in making a transition to a post -plant era. Both coal and nuclear plans help support a specialized, unique local economy. A community can and should think about how to transition to a new economic model by using as many of the unique strengths it has currently. 1. Asset Evaluation: How can current assets contribute to a post -plant future? a. Infrastructure: i. What kind of specialized infrastructure do you have in your community related to electric generation? This can include transmission lines, land owned by the utility, railroad lines, or ports. ii. What other infrastructure has supported your local utility plant, which may be not as obvious to outside observers? This can include internet connectivity, highways/roads/bridges, weather stations, etc. b. Economic: i. How many jobs has the electric utility provided for your community? ii. How much property tax revenue does the utility pay to your city? iii. What kind of specialized workforce does your community have as a result of hosting an electric generation plant? iv. What are the secondary businesses in your community related to the electric generation plant, e.g. Liberty Paper in Becker? v. Can you quantify the multiplier effect of each utility job to your community? c. Community I. How has the electric utility contributed to the culture of your community? For example, philanthropic activities, educational opportunities. ii. How will this change when the plant closes? iii. Who can you engage to fill any gaps? d. Are there any other assets your community has related to electric generation that this list has missed? 2. Utility -Community Relations: How will —and how can —local community leaders and organizations lead this transition? a. Partners with common goals: i. Who are your governmental unit partners? These are communities that may receive tax revenue from electric generation or others governmental partners Created for the Coalition of Utility Cities by Flaherty & Hood, P.A. 2017 including neighboring cities or counties that have infrastructure related to electric generation. ii. Who are the economic development, non-profit, civic, or educational partners that share some or all of your goals for a successful, post -plant era? This may be organizations or teams within the University of Minnesota, non-profit organizations that share common goals in community growth, or others. b. Plans for the Future: i. What steps have community leaders taken to meet with the utility to brainstorm steps to minimize the impact of plant closures? ii. Is your community leadership united in its view of this change? iii. How can the state, either through DEED, the Legislature or other State entity, support your transition to a post -plant era? 3. Environmental and Engineering Considerations: How will a plant closure impact local and state energy needs or the environment? a. How does the closure of your plant affect the power grid? b. Is there an environmental impact to closing the plant? If so, is the impact positive or negative? c. Who bears the cost of addressing a negative impact? 4. Summary: a. What are your communities largest competitive advantages? b. What are your community's largest barriers to a successful post -plant era? i. This may be things like information (mapping, knowledge of similarly situated communities, etc.), groups opposed to your communities aims (environmental, governmental, etc.), or local community knowledge c. As you develop answers to these questions, also prepare ways to communicate with the broader community about upcoming changes. Created for the Coalition of Utility Cities by Flaherty & Hood, P.A. 2017 Coalition of Utility Cities Treasurer's Report for Fiscal Year 2016 - 2017 (7/1/2016 -06/30/2017) Cash Balance Beginning Unrestricted Cash Balance 07/01/2016 $ 174,690.58 Dues Collected (Detailed below) 17,963.00 95,001.00 Dues Rebated 12,580.00 (34,690.58) FY 2016 - 2017 Invoices Paid 1,432.00 (50,687.39) FY 2015 - 2016 Invoice Paid 2,150.00 - Ending Cash Balance $ 184,313.61 Restricted Cash 8,329.00 (2,500.00) Ending Unrestricted Cash $ 181,813.61 Estimated Liability $ 95,001.00 $ - June Services - Flaherty and Hood $ (2,500.00) Budget Information Approved Budget (Not to Exceed) $ 110,000.00 Expenses (Including Any Estimated Liability) (53,187.39) Budget Remaining $ 56,812.61 Dues Information Respectfully Submitted, Marshall Hallock, CPA, Secretary - Treasurer Assessed Balance Due Becker 17,963.00 $ Cohasset 12,580.00 $ Granite Falls 1,432.00 $ Hoyt Lakes 2,150.00 $ Monticello 27,055.00 $ Oak Park Heights 8,329.00 $ Red Wing 25,492.00 $ $ 95,001.00 $ - Proposed Membership Rebate: 71,813.61 Respectfully Submitted, Marshall Hallock, CPA, Secretary - Treasurer TZ aiROMEMM ■ ■ ■ ■ :■■■■ nut/ Becker • Cohasset • Granite Falls • Hoyt Lakes + Monticello • Oak Park Heights • Red Wing 20176-2018-7 Policy Positions whleh-I@5A lux Ii V A ar r, I alult if the ,.I...nge i.. the In,.. AAd AR the iA1!V1:#n if an tijustment farts to the .. cV6/. k�q %-AiPh...fIPPt9 *6,. ; ...J value of Pipetrie g atieR eveF time. 11 Tax cuts to utilities have gone too far in shifting the property tax burden in host communities onto homeowners and other property tax payers. The Coalition of Utility Cities opposes any legislative attempt to give investor owned utilities more property tax relief at the expense of host communities and supports phasing out personal and real property tax exemptions for electric generation facilities and equipment. 23. The Coalition of Utility Cities supports continuation of the personal property tax on replacement equipment at all electric generation facilities that currently pay the personal property tax or a tax system which generates equal or greater revenue for host cities. 3. Conditional support of the "electric generation tax base" proposal, first proposed in 2015 as SF1636 (Skoe. DFL. Clearbrook). which replaces the personal orooertv tax on electric generation equipment and its exclusions and exemotions with a valuation based on generation capacity, production rate and nuclear fuel storage. This su000rt is conditioned on the inclusion of state transition aid for cities which lose tax base as a result of the change in the law and on the inclusion of an adiustment factor to the electric generation tax base which reflects the increased value of electric generation over time. 4. The Coalition of Utility Cities supports the inclusion of intangible costs (environmental impacts, etc) and opportunity costs (safety, economic development, etc) imposed on host cities in any analysis by the Department of Revenue and legislators in assessing appropriate property tax compensation provided by electric generation facilities. 5. Incentives for environmental improvements should not reduce the tax base of host communities. The costs of these improvements should be shared by all Minnesotans because all Minnesotans Proposed to the Coalition of Utility Cities on June 28, 2017 benefit from these improvements. The Coalition of Utility Cities supports narrowing or eliminating the pollution control equipment exemption and the limitation of the sliding scale exclusion for coal plants under 75 mw undergoing conversion (as passed by the 2014 Legislature) 6. In 2008, the omnibus tax bill provided host cities replacement aid to offset the significant reduction in tax revenue suffered by host cities as a result of the Department of Revenue's (MDOR) new utility valuation rules. The Coalition of Utility Cities opposes any statutory changes to the Utility Valuation Transition Aid program or any unallotment, reduction or delay in payments of this aid unless it is replaced by equal or greater revenue to host cities. If the replacement aid is reduced to balance the budget, it is the position of the Coalition that the class rate on electric generation property should be increased to offset the loss of aid. 7. The Coalition of Utility Cities supports legislation to significantly increase the audit and compliance resources of the MDOR's property tax division. 8. The Coalition of Utility Cities recognizes that coal and nuclear generation are important components of Minnesota's baseload portfolio and these facilities are necessary to deliver reliable, efficient, and cost-effective energy. 9. Coal-fired generation facilities rely on timely deliveries to maintain inventory stockpiles. Host cities have additional public safety and traffic concerns with rail blockages. Accordingly, the Coalition of Utility Cities supports efforts to improve freight rail operations and capacity in Minnesota. 10. The Coalition of Utility Cities supports the preparation of a state plan to address the long term needs of Host Utility Cities upon the closure of all or part of an electric generation facility. 11. The Coalition of Utility Cities supports legislative changes to state laws regulating municipal consent on siting of alternative energy facilities within 2 miles of municipal boundaries or an otherwise designated joint planning area. Proposed to the Coalition of Utility Cities on June 28, 2017 Becker • Cohasset • Granite Falls • Hoyt Lakes • Monticello • Oak Park Heights • Red Wing CUC 2017 Work Plan and Budget Proposed June 28, 2017 Considerations which will impact budget expenditures • Level of agreement/dissent among stakeholders for reform of tax on energy producing equipment. • Complexity of analysis for reform of tax • Extent to which CUC cities wish to engage in clean air policies in Minnesota • Extent to which CUC cities wish to pursue economic development, state aid or other responses to plant closures or conversions and State clean air policies. • In 2018, Xcel will be submitting a new Integrated Resource Plan to the PUC that will address the future of the nuclear plants and the King plant. • Extent to which CUC cities wish to participate in railroad capacity/safety debate. • Interest in issues relating to solar facility siting. Research Activities $20,000 - $25,000 Perform research on the effects of cities hosting electricity production plants: • Research land use and valuation issues associated with closure of power plants. • Evaluate host city options to handle effects of clean air regulations and closure/conversion of power plants. • Research other economic development opportunities for host cities. • Research impact of proposed changes to electricity plant taxation. • As needed, research of legislative and agency initiatives or actions. Monitoring Activities $20,000 - 30,000 Monitor key activities of legislature, agencies, task forces, and courts that may have impact on CUC interests. Monitor state and federal regulatory changes (PUC, EPA & MPCA) that may impact CUC city plants. Monitor clean air regulatory activities and initiatives. Monitor PUC proceedings with respect to CUC interests, including integrated resource plans, decommissioning, storage, and rate issues involving property taxes, and the investigation of environmental and socioeconomic costs of electricity production. • Monitor bill introductions and committee hearings for legislation and amendments that may implicate CLIC interests. • Monitor conference committees of bills affecting CLIC interests. Advocacy Activities $40,000 - 50,000 Advocate CUC's interests at Legislature, Department of Revenue, Pollution Control Agency and Governor's office. • Prepare handouts and supporting material. • Prepare correspondence to agencies and legislators. • Meet with CLIC member legislators and work to solidify support for legislation. Continue communication throughout legislative session. • Meet with tax chairs and tax committee members to discuss utility taxation legislation. • Meet with economic development chairs and committee members about response to clean air regulations and plant closures or conversions • Meet with environment chairs and committee members about response to clean air regulations and plant closures. • Meet with chairs and members of other committees if other legislation related to CLIC interests arises. • Meet with Department of Revenue as needed regarding taxation of electricity plants. • Meet with MN Pollution Control Agency as needed regarding the clean air regulations. • Meet with other stakeholders, including utilities and environmental groups as needed. • Draft legislation, secure authors and introduce bills. • Secure hearings as needed for legislation. • Identify testifiers and prepare talking points. Communication and Member Services $10,000 - $15,000 Communicate with member cities regarding activities described above. Arrange and conduct meetings and other member activities. • Draft regular updates for member cities on results of monitoring and advocacy work. • Visit with city councils (as requested). • Arrange pre -session and annual meetings. Arrange other meetings and teleconferences on as -needed basis. • Prepare Final Report for members. Total Range: $90,000 - $120,000 Gregory M. Davids State Representative District 28B Fillmore and Houston Counties April 20, 2017 Minnesota "! House of Representatives COMMITTEES: CHAIR, TAXES COMMERCE AND REGULATORY REFORM VETERANS AFFAIRS DIVISION WAYS AND MEANS Commissioner Cynthia Bauerly Minnesota Department of Revenue 600 N Robert Street St. Paul, MN 55146 Dear Commissioner Bauerly, RE: A follow-up to my letter of April 19, 2017 Upon receiving additional information on HF1985/SF2193, I believe my time frames are too aggressive for Department of Revenue runs and final numbers. We must be totally focused on the House/Senate Conference Committee on HF4. I appreciate the efforts of The Department and their very capable staff. After the conference report on HF4 is signed into law, I would like to continue our discussion on the aforementioned bill. As Always Yours, Your Friend, Gregory M. Davids, Chair MN House Tax Committee 585 State Office Building St. Paul MN 55155 P.O. Box 32, Preston, MN 55965 (507) 951-3893 _State Office Building, 100 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. St. Paul, Minnesota 55155 (651) 296-9278_ A Email: rep.greg.davids®house.mn cc: Paul Cumings, Tax Policy Manager, Minnesota Department of Revenue Grana McKiernan, Xcel Energy Thor Underdahl, Minnesota Power Stacey Fujii, Great River Energy Carolyn Jackson, Flaherty & Hood MDEPARTMENT OF REVENUE April 20, 2017 The Honorable Greg Davids Chair, House Tax Committee 585 State Office Building 100 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. Saint Paul, Minnesota 55155 Dear Chair Davids: Thank you for your letters dated April 19th regarding a revenue estimate request on HF1985. I am concerned that there has been miscommunication about the state of the work on this estimate and want to clarify. First, with respect to the request related to HF 1985, I want to assure you that there has been no hesitancy to provide any information, including revenue runs. Indeed, department staff have been working on this proposal for years. We provided significant information and comments to Senator Skoe's office in 2015 and 2016 on this concept. That work continues with your version of the proposal as found in HF1985. After your request for a revenue estimate and runs in March, department research staff began working on the request in consultation with House research and fiscal staff. This was the case despite the extremely busy time for providing estimates to the committee under tight deadlines. We work incredibly hard to provide timely estimates and comments to the committee and Chair. In those instances when multiple estimates are requested at the same time we work with committee staff to decide which estimate should be completed first. Both committee and department staff have been working in earnest to provide an estimate and the requested runs since the time of that request. The only time we were not actively working on your request is when we were waiting for the utilities to provide information to our staff or your staff. After receiving necessary information from the utilities, we have been working with your staff to clean the data, create assumptions for the runs, and prepare a formal estimate. In fact, we have been working throughout the last two weeks on data edits. We had anticipated that we would be able to provide an estimate and runs in the coming weeks, however, as you know the next few weeks will also be very busy with conference committee work. We appreciate your second letter of April 19, 2017 to establish the priority for work on HF 4. As you know, the Research Divisions of the Department of Revenue prepare hundreds of revenue analysis each year for the Tax Committees in the House and Senate. These experts work closely and collaboratively with experts of the House Research, Senate Counsel and Fiscal staff of each body to ensure that members have the information they need to consider policy options. Because of the volume of proposals each session, requests for estimates necessarily require 600 N. Robert St., St. Paul, MN 55146 An equal opportunity employer www.revenue.state.mn.us This material is available in alternate formats. prioritization. As has been the case for some time, requests related to bills that have been scheduled for a hearing are the highest priority. Requests for estimates for other proposals must be balanced based on the needs of members, particularly Chairs, and the Governor for information. We look forward to a discussion after session on how to move forward with the information you need on this proposal. We appreciate our strong working relationship and if there is a way to improve our communication on these issues with you or stakeholders to this proposal, I would be happy to discuss that with you. Sincerely, is Flauerly Commissioner Cc: Paul Cumings, Tax Policy Manager, Minnesota Department of Revenue Grania McKiernan, Xcel Energy Thor Underdahl, Minnesota Power Stacey Fujii, Great River Energy vl�arolyn Jackson, Flaherty & Hood Gregory M. Davids State Representative District 28B Fillmore and Houston Counties April 19, 2017 Commissioner Cynthia Bauerly Minnesota Department of Revenue 600 N. Robert St St. Paul MN 55146 Dear Commissioner Bauerly, Minnesota b House of s Representatives COMMITTEES: CHAIR, TAXES COMMERCE AND REGULATORY REFORM VETERANS AFFAIRS DIVISION WAYS AND MEANS RE: HF1985 (Davids)/SF2193 (Chamberlain) Electric utilities pay hundreds of millions of dollars in taxes each year. Many communities rely on those taxes to pay for services and to keep property taxes stable. Over many years, the current valuation methodology has been challenged. In 2014, former Tax Chair Senator Rod Skoe began work on an alternative method that could address the revenue stability issue, limit the personal property tax increases in utility customers' rates, while also simplifying the valuation process. This year I introduced HF1985 to continue that effort. HF1985 provides a new method for determining the market value for property tax purposes for facilities of most companies that produce, transmit, or distribute electric energy (excluding solar and wind energy production). The new valuation system is based on the capacity and actual production of power plants, the capacity of substations, the mileage and size of transmission lines, and the customer count of distribution lines. This replaces the current valuation system based on factors such as the cost and depreciation of the facilities. HF1985 also provides for state -paid replacement aid for local taxing jurisdictions that experience a loss in value under the new valuation system This is a major change and will require assistance from the Department of Revenue. Given the complex nature of HF1985 and shortness of time during this legislative session, I understand the hesitance to provide revenue runs. However, I am very committed to moving this bill forward in the 2018 session. Accordingly, I would like to get started on an analysis of HF1985 as soon as possible once the 2017 session is complete. An analysis of HF1985 will likely require a few iterations from the Department and the utilities. I would like to see an initial Department run by June 15, 2017 and final numbers by September 15, 2017. This will allow time to engage all stakeholders, including addressing any concerns from the Department, and r P.O. Box 32, Preston, MN 55965 (507) 951-3893 State Office Building, 100 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. St. Paul, Minnesota 55155 _ _ (651) 296-9278 /f Email: rep.greg.davids®house.mn Iwo address unforeseen impacts prior to moving the bill forward next session. This is an extremely important issue to local communities, as well as to the utilities. Thank you for your consideration, and for your ongoing work on this proposal. As Alwgys Yours, Your Friend, Re' eseVati.je Gregory M. Davids, Chair mnesota ouse Taxes Committee 585 State Office Building St. Paul MN 55155 cc: Paul Comings, Tax Policy Manager, Minnesota Department of Revenue Grania McKieman, Xcel Energy Thor Underdahl, Minnesota Power Stacey Fujii, Great River Energy Carolyn Jackson, Flaherty & Hood 3 n ai C N C N wo N 0. O � cn I xu 2T x = 0 cn ch '0 Q e -h 0 n C7 Q' Q 3=r 3 CD (D CD 3 �. C 3 ��\) I Q n �3 I D D 1 D 7 D Ti O 3 O • 0 C 0 w L m i O 1< V 3 O CDa rij CD CD rD w • 2T x = 0 cn CD e -h 0 1< V 3 O CDa rij CD CD rD w ■ zr (D X 00 ai U) (D w C) -E1)- -Ec)- -60F 4�+ -6c)- -E15F fFt �-A �-+ N N W W Ul O Ul O Ln O Ln � � C rrl O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 77 m m O O O O O O O O O O O O O O C) � Ln m 2 u f F u m a s rl rl 3 m n O n a� (D m Z how C n 3 3 C F U) ^V), a M7 N O I� A X ai cr X 00 O m n n 0 � � C rrl ` z U m u G) 77 m m u i.r (D r ' r O_ D r- r mZ mz t0 m m d u how C n 3 3 C F U) ^V), a M7 N O I� A X ai cr X 00 ■ C rt ". IND Wet rt zT x D 7 D Ti A -69r 4A- � -car�- N ..p m 00 C) N -P CY) CO O O O O O O O O O -Ef)- O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O _ n 3 Z o 2 Cn CD W .. CD CD CD v •� �G CD CD CC DD0 O C � -11 CD � CD C (D CD C O C C 0 o v �' X' 0 CD (n ma c(? o CD -s CD O O _ CD cn :3N Q C:CD cn O Cn O r+ CD G ::r CD CD Q. Sv T" O CD n. CD C;Do (n CCD CD CD CD Z O CCD• CD 1 Q cn ET CD O ;:W =r CCDD (D cn Cn -0 �- ( O }C'D� O m V O CD CD e --F CD CD v f, m O 113 v O 1 00 LO c Xp X U) _ _0 O fn c}� r -F ( V X 0 07 v 3 (D O O (D � O 0 C r* C 37 (D (D cQ cD 0 Q. 0. :z (a O (D r -r (D C7 � (D O � �Q 3 n _3 (D I n C7 rrt O I cn rD 7 rt T C rD Q x x co m Ln rD 0 Lnv G L a f Ln ro M T c rD 0 rD rD rD Q x x co v (D Ln 77 O rD a V*k- � V�- ij-�- 4-f*)- V)- � -' N W .p In Ql V O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O •Vj- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O N O O C) O w O 3 • • rD :3 rn r+ O T O C CD 7 O 00 0 O � O w O h rD r+ T C rD i rD G rD Q v x -V)- W :p (D DJ 1,0 � 0) O p�q O SO rD F CL V X n :3N C0 0 G X cr V I —h i O 3 �� mo //V lV �1 rD a N o O O O m o .. 00 =3 cnr' rD O O p i!F w O h rD r+ T C rD i rD G rD Q v x -V)- W :p (D DJ 1,0 � 0) O p�q O SO rD F CL V X n :3N C0 0 G X cr V I —h i O 3 �� mo //V lV �1 rD a N O O O m o .. o w O h rD r+ T C rD i rD G rD Q v x -V)- W :p (D DJ 1,0 � 0) O p�q O SO rD F CL V X n :3N C0 0 G X cr V I —h i O 3 �� mo //V lV �1 rD a N O O O i!F I� F- rD �, � Q ON O N O .. (D Ott I� •P C) O w O h rD r+ T C rD i rD G rD Q v x -V)- W :p (D DJ 1,0 � 0) O p�q O SO rD F CL V X n :3N C0 0 G X cr V I —h i O 3 �� mo //V lV �1 rD Ll — r v v m 3 CD o CD c ` o . (n CD fn 0(c `V m� X11 < CD UJ CD c -n CC \V Cn o CD m. CD CD --'h0 0 1 CD 3 to En 0 O O fD Q (D r+ v O N "D a� r+ (D 0 O 3 N n 7 O Ln r+ O O r+ NFL� M F� i O •. O F" N o Lrl o Lri o O Lri o Lrl 0 I 0 • •- 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0.. F� 0 0 , o � � a I N O F� 01 CY, W • N O _• O ' O • N • 0 • N N N O O • - 4�h C ag rt G 0 0 .JJ. T1 J CD 0^^ ca. C• r -l" 3 ^3 . ■• rn�rn VI W! I z M N O •. O 01 N O O 00 I O • •- ' O O 0.. F� N N � I N O F� 01 C ag rt G 0 0 .JJ. T1 J CD 0^^ ca. C• r -l" 3 ^3 . ■• rn�rn VI W! I z C] CD n x n CD cr m CD x rn m ch En 0 CD I v CD V �n J CD M7 Ul U) r (C) o o C ° 3 o -3' 0 rn cQ CD to ' 3 o C D' E CD n x n CD cr m CD x rn m ch En 0 CD I v CD V �n J CD M7 Ul U) 02/28/17 REVISOR LCB/LP 17-3874 This Document can be made available ,r m alternative formats upon request State. of Minnesota HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1985 NINETIETH SESSION H T. 1� No 03/02/2017 Authored by Davids slid Newberger P The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Job Growth and Energy Affordability Policy and Finance 03/14/2017 Adoption of Report Re-referred to the Committee on Taxes 1.1 A bill for an act 1 2 relating to taxation; property; modifying the taxation of electric generation and 1.3 distribution equipment andmachinety; amending Minnesota Statutes 2016, sections 1 4 216B.1621, subdivision 2; 216B.164, subdivision 2a; 272.02, subdivision 10; 1 5 273. 11, subdivision 1; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapters 1 6 273; 477A; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2016, sections 272.02, subdivisions 29, 1 7 33, 44, 45, 47, 52, 54, 55, 56, 68, 70, 71, 84, 89, 92, 93, 96, 99; 272.0211. t 8 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA: 19 Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 2016, section 216B.1621, subdivision 2, is amendedto read: 110 Subd. 2. Commission approval. (a) The commission shall approve an agreement under 1.11 this section upon finding that: 112 (1)J -.z i:.zrz�zd zleeHeie sefviez 1.14 (2) the public utility has a contractual option to purchase electric power from the proposed 1 15 facility; and 1.16 (3)_L2) the public utility can use the output from the proposed facility to meet its future 1 17 need for power as demonstrated in the most recent resource plan filed with and approved 118 by the commission under section 216B.2422. 1 19 (b) Sections 216B.03, 216B.05, 21613.06, 21613.07, 216B.16, 216B.162, and 216B.23 1 ^_o do not apply to an agreement under this section. 1 21 EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective for assessment year 2018 and thereafter. Section 1. 1 02/28/17 REVISOR LCB/LP 17-3874 2.1 Sec. 2. Minnesota Statutes 2016, section 216B.164, subdivision 2a, is amended to read: 112 Subd. 2a. Definitions. (a) For the purposes of this section, the following terms have the 23 meanings given them. 2.4 (b) "Aggregated meter" means a meter located on the premises of a customer's owned 25 or leased property that is contiguous with property containing the customer's designated 2.6 meter. 2.7 (c) "Capacity" means the number of megawatts alternating current (AC) at the point of 2.8 interconnection between a distributed generation facility and autility's electric system. 2.9 (d) "Cogeneration" means a combined process whereby electrical and useful thermal 210 energy are produced simultaneously. 2.11 (e) "Contiguous property" means property owned or leased by the customer sharing a 2.12 common border, without regard to interruptions in contiguity caused by easements, public 2.13 thoroughfares, transportation rights-of-way, or utility rights-of-way. 2.14 (f) "Customer" means the person who is named on the utility electric bill for the premises. 2.15 (g) "Designated meter" means a meter that is physically attached to the customer's facility 2.16 that the customer -generator designates as the fust meter to which net metered credits are 217 to be applied as the primary meter for billing purposes when the customer is serviced by 2.18 more than one meter. 2.19 (h) "Distributed generation" means a facility that: 2.20 (1) has a capacity of ten megawatts or less; 2.21 (2) is interconnected with a utility's distribution system, overwhich the commission has 2.22 jurisdiction; and 223 (3) generates electricity from natural gas, renewable fuel, or a similarly clean fuel, and 2.24 may include waste heat, cogeneration, or fuel cell technology. 2.25 (i) "High -efficiency distributed generation" means a distributed energy facility that has 226 a minimum efficiency of 40 percent, as calculated under Minnesota Statutes 2016, section 2.27 272.0211, subdivision 1.. 2.28 0) "Netmetered facility" means an electric generation facility constructed for the purpose 229 of offsetting energy use through the use of renewable energy or high -efficiency distributed 2.30 generation sources. 231 (k) "Renewable energy" has the meaning given in section 216B.2411, subdivision 2. See. 2, 2 02/28/17 REVISOR LCB/LP 17-3874 3 1 (1) "Standby charge" means a charge imposed by an electric utility upon a distributed 32 generation facility for the recovery of costs for the provision of standby services, as provided 3.3 for in a utility's tariffs approved by the commission, necessary to make electricity service 34 available to the distributed generation facility. 35 EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective for assessment year 2018 and thereafter. 3 6 Sec. 3. Minnesota Statutes 2016, section 272.02, subdivision 10, is amended to read: 3 7 Subd. 10. Personal property used for pollution control. Personal property used 3 8 primarily for the abatement and control of air, water, or land pollution is exempt to the 39 extent that it is so used, and real property is exempt if it is used primarily for abatement and 3 10 control of air, water, or land pollution as part of an agricultural operation, as a part of a 311 centralized treatment and recovery facility operating under a permit issued by the Minnesota 3 12 Pollution Control Agency pursuant to chapters 115 and 116 and Minnesota Rules, parts 3 13 7001.0500 to 7001.0730, and 7045.0020 to 7045.1030, as a wastewater treatment facility 3 14 and for the treatment, recovery, and stabilization of metals, oils, chemicals, water, sludges, 315 or inorganic materials from hazardous industrial wastes, of as _aA .f n electric gener.t:,. 316 systeat. For purposes of this subdivision, personal property includes ponderous machinery 317 and equipment used in a business or production activity that at common law is considered 31 s real property. The real or personal property of an electric generation, transmission, 3 1 e distribution, and substation system is not eligible for an exemption under this section. 320 Any taxpayer requesting exemption of all or a portion of any real property or any 321 equipment or device, or part thereof, operated primarily for the control or abatement of air, 3.22 water, or land pollution shall file an application with the commissioner of revenue. The 3 23 eeffifnissionef shall Elevelep aft elee4anie faeans te notify iiitefested 13afties when electric 3 24 l3ewef genefatiaii f -"'t'-- have F' -a ._ .__':__t:._ The Minnesota Pollution Control 3 25- Agency shall upon request of the commissioner furnish information and advice to the 126 commissioner. 3 27 The information and advice furnished by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency must 3.28 include statements as to whether the equipment, device, or real property meets a standard, 3 29 rule, criteria, guideline, policy, or order of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, and 3 30 whether the equipment, device, or real property is installed or operated in accordance with 331 it. On determining that property qualifies for exemption, the commissioner shall issue an 3 32 order exempting the property from taxation. The commissioner shall develop an electronic 3.33 means to notify interested parties when the commissioner has issued an order exempting 3.34 property from taxation under this subdivision. The equipment, device, or real property shall See. 1 3 02/28/17 REVISOR LCB/LP 17-3874 4.1 continue to be exempt from taxation as long as the order issued by the commissioner remains 4.2 in effect. 49 EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective for assessment year 2018 and thereafter. 4.4 Sec. 4. Minnesota Statutes 2016, section 273. 11, subdivision 1, is amended to read: 45 Subdivision 1. Generally. Except as provided in this section or seetien sections 273.129 4.5 and 273.17, subdivision 1, all property shall be valued at its market value. The market value 4.7 as determined pursuant to this section shall be stated such that any amount under $100 is 4.8 rounded up to $100 and any amount exceeding $100 shall be rounded to the nearest $100. 49 In estimating and determining such value, the assessor shall not adopt a lower or different 4.10 standard of value because the same is to serve as a basis of taxation, nor shall the assessor 4.11 adopt as a criterion of value the price for which such property would sell at a forced sale, 4.12 or in the aggregate with all the property in the town or district; but the assessor shall value 413 each article or description of property by itself, and at such sum or price as the assessor 414 believes the same to be fairly worth in money. The assessor shall take into account the effect 415 on the market value of property of environmental factors in the vicinity of the property. In 4.16 assessing any tract or lot of real property, the value of the land, exclusive of structures and 4A7 improvements, shall be determined, and also the value of all structures and improvements 4.18 thereon, and the aggregate value of the property, including all structures and improvements, 4.19 excluding the value of crops growing upon cultivated land. In valuing real property upon 4.20 which there is a mine or quarry, it shall be valued at such price as such property, including 421 the mine or quarry, would sell for at a fair, voluntary sale, for cash, if the material being 422 mined or quarried is not subject to taxation under section 298.015 and the mine or quarry 423 is not exempt from the general property tax under section 298.25. In valuing real property 424 which is vacant, platted property shall be assessed as provided in subdivisions 14a and 14c. 4.25 All property, or the use thereof, which is taxable under section 272.0 1, subdivision 2, or 426 273.19, shall be valued at the market value of such property and not at the value of a leasehold 4.27 estate in such property, or at some lesser value than its market value. 4:28 EFFECTIVE DATE, This section is effective for assessment vear 2018 and thereafter. 4.29 Sec. 5, 1273.1291 ELECTRIC GENERATION MACIIINERY, TRANSMISSION, 4.30 DISTRIBUTION, AND SUBSTATION; VALUATION. 4.31 Subdivision 1. Definitions. (a) For purposes of this section, the following terms have 4.92 the meanings given. Sec. 5. 4 02/28/17 REVISOR LCB/LP 17-3874 51 (b) "Biomass generating system" means a device used to produce energy by the direct 5 2 combustion of carbon -based organisms. 53 (c) "Coal generating system" means a device whose primary purpose is the production 54 of electricity derived by the direct combustion of coal to produce steam. 5 5 (d) "Electric distribution line" means an exterior or underground line whose functional 5.6 character is not identified as transmission in annual utility filings to federal agencies that 5 7 regulate the interstate transmission of electricity. 5.8 (e) "Electric generation system" means all personal property and operating real property 5 n used for the purpose of generating electricity, excluding: 5 10 (1) solar energy generating systems; and 5 11 (2) wind energy conversion systems. 512 (f) "Electric substation" means property whose functional character is identified as 513 transmission in annual utility filings to federal agencies that regulate the interstate 514 transmission of electricity. Electric substation capacity shall be deternamedby the property's 5 15 secondary voltage. 5 16 (g) "Electric system component" means an electric generation system, an electric 5 17 distribution line, an electric transmission line, or an electric substation. 5 18 (h) "Electric transmission line" means an exterior or underground line whose functional 5 1 v character is identified as transmission in annual utility filings to federal agencies thatregulate 5 20 the interstate transmission of electricity. 5 21 (i) "Hydroelectric generating system" means a device whose primary purpose is the 522 production of electricity derived from flowing water. 523 (j) "Nameplate capacity" means the maximum rated output of a generator, prime mover, 524 or other electric power production equipment under specific conditions designated by the 525 manufacturer. 526 (k) "Natural gas generating system" means a device whose primary purpose is the 5 27 production of electricity derived from natural gas. 528 (1) "Nuclear fuel generating system" means a device whose primary purpose is the 5 2e production of electricity generated by the use of the thermal energy released from the fission 5 30 of nuclear fuel in a reactor. 5 3 t (m) "Oil generating system" means a device whose primary purpose is the production 532 of electricity derived by direct combustion of oil to produce steam. Sec. 5. 5 02/28/17 REVISOR LCB/LP 17-3874 6.1 (n) 'Primary fuel source" means the fuel source that is dominantly used by a facility in 62 the production of electricity. 6.3 (o) "Spent fuel' means fuel that has been irradiated in a nuclear reactor to the point 6.4 where it is no longer useful in sustaining a nuclear reaction. 6.5 Subd. 2. Valuation rates. (a) The electric generation capacity valuation is the nameplate 6.6 capacity in kilowatts multiplied by: 6.7 (1) $0 for hydroelectric generating systems; 6.8 (2) $5 for machinery used to generate electricity from biomass, natural gas, or nuclear 69 fuel generation systems; and 6.10 (3) $10 for machinery used to generate electricity from a coal or oil generation system 6.11 or any other fossil fuel. 6.12 (b) The electric production valuation is the production in kilowatt hours multiplied by: 613 (1) $0.05 for hydroelectric generating systems; 6.14 (2) $0.0525 for machinery used to generate electricity from biomass, natural gas, or 6.15 nuclear fuel generation systems; and 6.16 (3) $0.055 for machinery used to generate electricity from a coal or oil generation system 6.17 or any other fossil fuel. 6J8 (c) The spent fuel valuation is the tons, or fractions thereof, of spent fuel stored at a 6.19 nuclear generating facility, multiplied by $75,000. The value of spent fuel shall be 620 apportioned to the jurisdiction where the spent fuel is stored. 621 (d) The electric substation valuation rate is $23,790 times the capacity in megavolt 6.22 amperes (Wa) of all electric substation transformers. 623 (e) The electric transmission line valuation rate is $778 per mile. 6.24 (f) The electric distribution line valuation rate is $1,287 per customer. 6.25 (g) The rates provided in paragraph (b) shall be adjusted annually by an amount equal 626 to the percentage change, if any, in the gross domestic product for nonresidential investment 6.27 for the current year as compared to the previous year, as reported on Table 1.1.1 by the 628 United States Bureau of Economic Analysis. A rate change pursuant to this section shall 6.29 be effective for the following taxes payable year. 630 Subd. 3. Electric system valuation. (a) The commissioner shall annually calculate the 6.31 value of each electric system component under this section, excluding any components Sec. 5. 6 02/28/17 REVISOR LCB/LP 17-3874 71 owned or operated by a municipal utility, a rural electric distribution cooperative, or an 7 2 electric generation system wholly owned by a municipal power agency. Electric systems 7.3 owned or operated by a generation and transmission cooperative may permanently elect not 74 to be valued under this section by notifying the commissioner of revenue prior to July 1, 75 2017. 7.6 (b) An electric generating system that has permanently closed, or that has a nameplate 77 capacity of one megawatt or less as determined under subdivision 4, shall have a valuation 7 8 of $0 under this section. The commissioner shall calculate the value of each generation 79 facility using the applicable capacity and generation rates for each generator based on the 7 10 electric generation system's primary fuel source. 7 It (c) The valuation for an electric generation system is equal to the sum of: 7 12 (1) its nameplate capacity multiplied by its generation capacity valuation rate; 713 (2) the average of its electric energy production as reported to the commissioner of 714 revenue for the immediately preceding five years, multiplied by its production valuation 7.15 rate; and 7 16 (3) its spent fuel valuation. 717 (d) For electric generators that have been operational for less than the immediately 718 preceding five years, the average of the electric generator's electric energy production shall 719 be the average of its electric energy production for the time period since the facility 7 20 commenced operation. 721 Subd. 4. Electric generating systems; size. The total capacity of an electric generating 722 system pursuant to this section shall be determined by combining all generators of each fuel 7 23 type within each facility, based on the information reported to the commissioner of revenue 724 as required under subdivision 5. 725 Subd. 5. Generating systems; reports. (a) An owner of an electric generating system, 7 2e transmission lines, distribution lines, or electric substations, subject to taxation under this 727 section must file a report with the commissioner of revenue annually on or before March 729 31 detailing, if applicable: 729 (1) the amount of electricity produced by each generator in the previous calendar year 730 as reported to the United States Energy Information Administration; 7.31 (2) the location, length, and capacity of all transmission lines; and See, 5. 7 02/28/17 REVISOR LCB/LP 17-3874 8.1 (3) the location and capacity of all electric transmission substations, including individual 82 transformers. 8.3 (b) The commissioner shall prescribe the form of the report and the report must contain 8.4 the information required by the commissioner to determine the tax base under this section. as The commissioner may, for good cause, extend the time for filing the report as reouired 8.6 under this section. The extension may not exceed 15 days. 8.7 (c) If an owner of an electric generating system fails to file the report by the due date, 8.8 the commissioner of revenue may determine the tax base upon the sum of: 89 (1) the nameplate capacity ofthe system's generators multiplied by the generation capacity 8.10 rate for the generator's primary fuel source; 8,11 (2) a production of 100 percent of annual capacity of the facility multiplied by the 8.12 generation rate for the primary fuel source; and 8.13 (3) the greater of the spent fuel tax base from the prior year, or the amount as reported 8,14 by the United States Energy Information Administration. 8.15 (d) If an owner of an electric transmission or distribution line, or an electric substation, 8.16 fails to file the report by the due date, the commissioner of revenue shall determine the 8.17 valuation based upon the prior year's valuation. 8.18 Subd. 6. Notification to counties. The commissioner of revenue shall annually on or S.19 before March 31 notify the auditor of each county of the valuation by taxing jurisdiction of 820 each electric generating, transmission, distribution, and substation system operating in the 8.21 county. 8.22 Subd. 7. Omitted or undervalued property. If an electric generation, transmission, 9.23 distribution, and substation system is omitted in the determination of the valuation and 824 thereby escapes taxation, or if the system is discovered to have been undervalued, or, if the 825 capacity or production has been underreported, the commissioner of revenue shall determine 8.26 the valuation for the year or years omitted. The commissioner of revenue shall, on or before 827 March 31, notify the county auditor of the county where the electric generation transmission, 8,28 distribution, and substation system is located of the omitted or underreported valuation, and 5.29 the county auditor shall extend against the owner arrearage of taxes properly due. The 8.30 authority of die commissioner of revenue to determine valuation under this section shall be 8.31 limited to the immediately preceding three years. 8,32 EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective for assessment year 2018 and thereafter. Sec. 5. 8 02/28/17 REVISOR LCB/LP 17-3874 91 Sec. 6. (477A.231 ELECTRIC GENERATION, TRANSMISSION, DISTRIBUTION, Q2 AND SUBSTATION REPLACEMENT AID. 93 Subdivision 1. Definitions. (a) For purposes of this section, the definitions found in 94 section 273.129, subdivision 1, apply, in addition, the following tern has the meaning given. 95 (b) "Local unit" means a home rule charter or statutory city, county, or town. 96 Subd. 2. Aid eligibility; payment. (a) For aids payable in 2019 only, replacement aid 9 7 under this section equals: 9 8 (1) the net tax capacity of all personal property of all electric generation, transmission 9.9 and distribution lines, and substation systems as determined for assessment year 2017 910 multiplied by the payable 2018 local tax rate; minus 911 (2) the net tax capacity in 2018 of all electric generation, transmission or distribution 912 lines, and substation systems as determined under section 273.129, multipliedbv the payable ,) 13 2019 local tax rate. 914 (b) Eligibility under this subdivision also includes all sections of electric transmission 915 lines under construction but not completed upon final enactment. The aid payment may not 91 e be less than zero. 917 (c) For aids payable in 2020 and thereafter, aid shall equal the difference between the 918 prior assessment year's tax capacity multiplied by the current year local tax rate and the tax 919 capacity for the assessment two years prior multiplied by the prior year local tax rate, plus 9 20 the prior year's aid if any, under this section, if the tax capacity of electric generation, 921 transmission, distribution, and substation systems is: 922 (1) reduced by more than ten percent as compared to the previous year; and 923 (2) the reduction is more than five percent of a local unit's total tax base. 924 (d) If paragraph (c) does not apply, aid shall be equal to: 9,25 (1) 95 percent of the prior year's aid; minus 926 (2) the difference between the prior assessment year multiplied by the current year local 927 tax rate and the assessment two years prior multiplied by the prior year local tax rate for 929 the electric generation, transmission, distribution, and substation tax base. 929 (e) Aid shall cease if aid is certified to be less than five percent of the net tax capacity 930 for the current assessment year multiplied by the local tax rate. Sec. 6. 9 02/28/17 REVISOR LCB/LP 17-3874 10.1 (f) The commissioner shall compute the amount of replacement aid payable to each local 10 .2 unit under this section. Aid payment amounts under paragraph (a) must be certified by 10.3 September 1, 2019. Aid payments computed under paragraphs (b) and (c) must be certified 10.4 on or before August 1 of each year, for aids payable in the following year for each recipient 10.5 local unit. The commissioner shall pay replacement aid to local units annually at the time 106 provided for the second installment of local government aid under section 477A.015. 10.7 (g) The commissioner may require counties and owners of electric generation facilities, Mg transmission and distribution lines, and substations to provide any documentation necessary 109 to administer this section. 1010 Solid. 3. Appropriation. An amount sufficient to pay transition aid under this section io.tt is annually appropriated to the commissioner of revenue from the general fund. to. 12 EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective for aids payable in 2019 and thereafter. 10.13 Sec. 7. COMMISSIONER NOTIFICATION. 10.14 The commissioner of revenue must annually notify the revisor of statutes which 1015 subdivisions or sections have met the condition for repeal under section 8, paragraph (b). 10.16 Sec. 8. REPEALER. 10.17 (a) Minnesota Statutes 2016, section 272.0211, is repealed. 10.18 (b) Minnesota Statutes 2016, section 272.02, subdivisions 29, 33, 44, 45, 47, 52, 54, 55, la.19 56, 68, 70, 71, 84, 89, 92, 93, 96, and 99, are each repealed upon the expiration of the 10.2o purchase power agreement in effect for the facility defined in the subdivision as of June 30. 1021 2017. 1022 EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective for assessmentyear 2018 and thereafter. Sec. 8. 10 APPENDIX Repealed Minnesota Statutes: 17-3874 272.02 EXEMPT PROPERTY. Subd. 29. Cogeneration systems; certain property. Notwithstanding subdivision 9, clause (a), attached machinery and other personal property which is pati of a facility containing a cogeneration system as described in section 216B.166, subdivision 2, paragraph (a), is exempt if the cogeneration system has met the following criteria: (i) the system utilizes natural gas as a primary fuel and the cogenerated steam initially replaces steam generated from existing thermal boilers utilizing coal; (ii) the facility developer is selected as a result of a procurement process ordered by the Public Utilities Commission; and (iii) construction of the facility is commenced after July 1, 1994, and before July 1, 1997. Subd. 33. Electric generation facility personal property. Notwithstanding subdivision 9, clause (a), attached machinery and other personal property which is pmt of a simple -cycle combustion -turbine electric generation facility that exceeds 250 megawatts of installed capacity and that meets the requirements of this subdivision is exempt. At the time of construction, the facility must: (i) not be owned by a public utility as defined in section 216B.02, subdivision 4; (ii) utilize natural gas as a primary fuel; (iii) be located within 20 miles of the intersection of an existing 42 -inch (outside diameter) natural gas pipeline and a 345 -kilovolt high-voltage electric transmission line; and (iv) be designed to provide peaking, emergency backup, or contingency services, and have received a certificate of need pursuant to section 216B.243 demonstrating demand for its capacity. Construction of the facility must be commenced after July 1, 1999, and before July 1, 2003. Property eligible for this exemption does not include electric transmission lines and interconnections or gas pipelines and interconnections appurtenant to the property or the facility. Subd. 44. Electric generation facility personal property. Notwithstanding subdivision 9, clause (a), attached machinery and other personal property which is part of a simple -cycle combustion-tubine electric generation facility that exceeds 250 megawatts of installed capacity and that meets the requirements of this subdivision is exempt. At the time of construction, the facility must: (1) utilize natural gas as a primary fuel; (2) be located within 20 miles of parallel existing 16 -inch and 12 -inch (outside diameter) natural gas pipelines and a 345 -kilovolt high-voltage electric transmission line; and (3) be designed to provide peaking, emergency backup, or contingency services, and have received a certificate of need under section 216B.243 demonstrating demand for its capacity. Construction of the facility must be commenced after January 1, 2000, and before January 1, 2004. Property eligible for this exemption does not include electric transmission lines and interconnections or gas pipelines and interconnections appurtenant to the property or the facility. Subd. 45, Biomass electrical generation facility; personal property. Notwithstanding subdivision 9, clause (a), attached machinery and other personal property which is part of an electrical generating facility that meets the requirements of this subdivision is exempt. At the time of construction, the facility must: (1) be designed to utilize biomass as established in section 216B.2424 as a primary fuel source; and (2) be constructed for the purpose of generating power at the facility that will be sold pursuant to a contract approved by the Public Utilities Commission in accordance with the biomass mandate imposed under section 216B.2424. Construction of the facility must be commenced after January 1, 2000, and before December 31, 2005. Property eligible for this exemption does not include electric transmission lines and interconnections or gas pipelines and interconnections appurtenant to the property or facility. Subd. 47. Poultry litter biomass generation facility; personal property. Notwithstanding subdivision 9, clause (a), attached machinery and other personal property which is part of an electrical generating facility that meets the requirements of this subdivision is exempt. At the time of construction, the facility must: (1) be designed to utilize poultry litter as a primary fuel source; and (2) be constructed for the purpose of generating power at the facility that will be sold pursuant to a contract approved by the Public Utilities Commission in accordance with the biomass mandate imposed under section 216B.2424. Construction of the facility must be commenced after January 1, 2003, and before December 31, 2005. Property eligible for this exemption does not include electric transmission W11 APPENDIX Repealed Minnesota Statutes: 17-3874 lines and interconnections or gas pipelines and interconnections appurtenant to the property or the facility. Solid. 52. Electric generation facility; personal property. Notwithstanding subdivision 9, clause (a), attached machinery and other personal property which is part of a simple -cycle combustion -turbine electric generation facility of more than 40 megawatts and less than 50 megawatts of installed capacity and that meets the requirements of this subdivision is exempt. At the time of construction, the facility must: (1) utilize natural gas as a primary fuel; (2) be located within two miles of parallel existing 36 -inch natural gas pipelines and an existing 115 -kilovolt high-voltage electric transmission line; (3) be designed to provide peaking, emergency backup, or contingency services; and (4) satisfy a resource deficiency identified in an approved integrated resource plan filed under section 21613.2422. Construction of the facility must be commenced after January 1, 2001, and before January 1, 2005. Property eligible for this exemption does not include electric transmission lines and interconnections or gas pipelines and interconnections appurtenant to the property or the facility. Solid. 54. Small biomass electric generation facility; personal property. (a) Subject to paragraph (b), notwithstanding subdivision 9, clause (a), attached machinery and other personal property which is part of an electrical generating facility that meets the requirements of this subdivision is exempt. At the time of construction the facility must: (1) have a generation capacity of less than 25 megawatts; (2) provide process heating needs in addition to electrical generation; and (3) utilize agricultural by-products from the malting process and other biomass fuels as its primary fuel source. Construction of the facility must be commenced after January 1, 2002, and before January 1, 2008. Property eligible for this exemption does not include electric transmission lines and interconnections or gas pipelines and interconnections appurtenant to the property or facility. (b) The exemption under this subdivision is contingent on approval by the governing bodies of the municipality and county in which the electric generation facility is located. Solid. 55. Electric generation facility; personal property. Notwithstanding. subdivision 9, clause (a), attached machinery and other personal property which is part of an electric generating facility that meets the requirements of this subdivision is exempt. At the time of construction, the facility must (i) be eligible to be designated as an innovative energy project under section 216B.1694, except that, notwithstanding anything to the contrary in section 216B.1694, a project may include gas-fired generating facilities that me adaptable for subsequent incorporation into a facility that uses coal as a primary fuel, provided that this exception applies only to the eligibility for exemption under this section, (ii) be within a tax relief area as defined in section 273.134, (iii) have access to existing railroad infrastructure within less than three miles, (iv) have received by resolution approval from the governing body of the county and township or city in which the proposed facility is to be located for the exemption of personal property under this subdivision, and (v) be designed to host at least 500 megawatts of electrical generation. Construction of the first 100 megawatts of the facility must be commenced after January 1, 2006, and before January 1, 2012. Construction of up to an additional 750 megawatts of generation must be commenced before January 1, 2015. Property eligible for this exemption does not include electric transmission lines and interconnections or gas pipelines and interconnections appurtenant to the property or the facility. To qualify for an exemptionunder this subdivision, the owner of the electric generation facility must have an agreement with the host county, township or city, and school district, for payment in. lieu of personal property taxes to the host county, township or city, and school district. Solid. 56. Electric generation facility; personal property. (a) Notwithstanding subdivision 9, clause (a), attached machinery and other personal property which is part of a combined -cycle combustion-unbine electric generation facility that exceeds 300 megawatts of installed capacity and that meets the requirements of this subdivision is exempt. At the time of construction, the facility must: (1) be designed to utilize natural gas as a primary fuel; (2) not be owned by a public utility as defined in section 21613.02, subdivision 4; (3) be located within five miles of an existing natural gas pipeline and within four miles of an existing electrical transmission substation; (4) he located outside the metropolitan area as defined under section 473.121, subdivision 2; and (5) be designed to provide energy and ancillary services and have received a certificate of need under section 21613.243. K7 APPENDIX Repealed Minnesota Statutes: 17-3874 (b) Construction of the facility must be commenced after January 1, 2004, and before January 1, 2007, except that property eligible for this exemption includes any expansion of the facility that also meets the requirements of paragraph (a), clauses (1) to (5), without regard to the date that construction of the expansion commences. Property eligible for this exemption does not include electric transmission lines and interconnections or gas pipelines and interconnections appurtenant to the property or the facility. Subd. 68. Electric generation facility; personal property. (a) Notwithstanding subdivision 9, clause (a), attached machinery and other personal property which is part of a simple -cycle combustion -turbine electric generation facility that exceeds 290 megawatts of installed capacity and that meets the requirements of this subdivision is exempt. At the time of construction, the facility must: (1) be designed to utilize natural gas as a primary fuel; (2) not be owned by a public utility as defined in section 21613.02, subdivision 4; (3) be located within 15 miles of an existing natural gas pipeline and within five miles of an existing electrical transmission substation; (4) be located outside the metropolitan area as defined under section 473.121, subdivision 2 (5) be designed to provide peaking capacity energy and ancillary services and have satisfied all of the requirements under section 21613.243; and (6) have received, by resolution, the approval from the governing body of the county, city, and school district in which the proposed facility is to be located for the exemption of personal property under this subdivision. (b) Construction of the facility must be commenced after January 1, 2005, and before January 1, 2009. Property eligible for this exemption does not include electric transmission lines and interconnections or gas pipelines and interconnections appurtenant to the property or the facility. Subd. 70. Electric generation facility; personal property. Notwithstanding subdivision 9, clause (a), attached machinery and other personal property which is part of an existing simple -cycle, combustion -turbine electric generation facility that exceeds 300 megawatts of installed capacity and that meets the requirements of this subdivision is exempt. At the time of the construction, the facility must: (1) be designed to utilize natural gas as a primary fuel; (2) be owned by a public utility as defined in section 216B.02, subdivision 4, and be located at or interconnected with an existing generating plant of the utility; (3) be designed to provide peaking, emergency backup, or contingency services; (4) satisfy a resource need identified in an approved integrated resource plan filed under section 21613.2422; and (5) have received, by resolution, the approval from the governing body of the county and the city for the exemption of personal property under this subdivision. Construction of the facility expansion must be commenced after January 1, 2004, and before January 1, 2005. Property eligible for this exemption does not include electric transmission lines and interconnections or gas pipelines and interconnections appurtenant to the property or the facility. Subd. 71. Electric generation facility; personal property. (a) Notwithstanding subdivision 9, clause (a), attached machinery and other personal property which is part of a simple -cycle combustion -turbine electric generation facility that exceeds 150 megawatts of installed capacity and that meets the requirements of this subdivision is exempt. At the time of construction, the facility must: (1) utilize natural gas as a primary fuel; (2) be owned by an electric generation and transmission cooperative; (3) be located within five miles of parallel existing 12 -inch and 16 -inch natural gas pipelines and a 69 -kilovolt high-voltage electric transmission line; (4) be designed to provide peaking, emergency backup, or contingency services; (5) have received a certificate of need under section 21613.243 demonstrating demand for its capacity; and (6) have received by resolution the approval from the governing body of the county and township in which the proposed facility is to be located f'or the exemption of personal property under this subdivision. (b) Construction of the facility must be commenced after July 1, 2005, and before January 1, 2009. Property eligible for this exemption does not include electric transmission lines and interconnections or gas pipelines and interconnections appurtenant to the property or the facility. 3R APPENDIX Repealed Minnesota Statutes: 17-3874 Subd. 84. Electric generation facility; personal property. Notwithstanding subdivision 9, clause (a), attached machinery and other personal property which is part of a 10.3 megawatt run -of -the -river hydroelectric generation facility and that meets the requirements of this subdivision is exempt At the time of construction, the facility must: (1) utilize between 12 and 16 turbine generators at a dam site existing on March 31, 1994; (2) be located on land within 3,000 feet of a 13.8 kilovolt distribution substation; and (3) be eligible to receive a renewable energy production incentive payment under section 216C.41. Construction of the facility must be commenced after April 30, 2006, and before January 1, 2011. Property eligible for this exemption does not include electric transmission lines and interconnections or gas pipelines and interconnections appurtenant to the property or the facility. SuU 89. Electric generation facility; personal property. (a) Notwithstanding subdivision 9, paragraph (a), attached machinery and other personal property which is put of a simple -cycle combustion -turbine electric generation facility that exceeds 150 megawatts of installed capacity and that meets the requirements of this subdivision is exempt. At the time of construction, the facility must: (1) utilize natural gas as a primary fuel; (2) be owned by an electric generation and transmission cooperative; (3) be Iocated within one mile of an existing 16 -inch natural gas pipeline and a 69 -kilovolt and a 230 -kilovolt high-voltage electric transmission line; (4) be designed to provide peaking, emergency backup, or contingency services; (5) have received a certificate of need under section 21613.243 demonstrating demand for its capacity; and (6) have received by resolution the approval from the governing bodies of the county and the city in which the proposed facility is to be located for the exemption of personal property under this subdivision. (b) Construction of the facility must be commenced after January 1, 2008, and before January 1, 2012. Property eligible for this exemption does not include electric transmission lines and interconnections or gas pipelines and interconnections appurtenant to the property or the facility. Subd. 92. Electric generation facility; personal property. (a) Notwithstanding subdivision 9, clause (a), attached machinery and other personal property that is part of an electric generation facility that exceeds 150 megawatts of installed capacity, does not exceed 780 megawatts of summer capacity, and meets the requirements of this subdivision is exempt. At the start of construction, the facility must: (1) be designed to utilize natural gas as a primary fuel; (2) be owned by an entity other than a public utility as defined in section 21613.02, subdivision 4; (3) be located within five miles of two or more interstate natural gas pipelines; (4) be located within one mile of an existing electrical transmission substation with operating alternating current voltages of 115 W,, 345 W,, and 500 kV; (5) be designed to provide electrical capacity, energy, and ancillary services; (6) have satisfied all of the requirements under section 216B.243; (7) have executed an interconnection agreement with the Midwest Independent System Operator that does not require the acquisition of more than one mile of new electric transmission right-of-way within the county where the facility is located, and does not provide for any other new routes or corridors for future electric transmission lines in the county where the facility is located; (8) he located in a county with an essential services and transmission services ordinance; (9) have signed a development agreement with the county board in the county in which the facility is located. The development agreement must be adopted by a two-thirds vote of the county board, and must contain provisions ensuring: (i) the facility is designed to use effluent from a wastewater treatment facility as its preferred water source if it includes any combined -cycle units, and will not seek an exemption from legislative approval under section 103G.265, subdivision 3, paragraph (b); and (ii) all processed wastewater discharge will be colocated with the outfall of a wastewater treatment facility; (10) have signed a development agreement with the township board in the township in which the facility is located containing provisions ensuring that noise and visual impacts of the facility are mitigated. The development agreement must be adopted by a two-thirds vote of the township board; and (11) have an agreement with the host county, township, and school district for payment in lieu of personal property taxes to the host county, township, and school district for a total amount 4R APPENDIX Repealed Minnesota Statutes: 17-3874 not to exceed $600,000 per year for the operating life of the facility. Any amount distributed to the school district is not subject to the deductions under section 126C.21. (b) Construction of the facility must begin after March 1, 2010, and before March 1, 2014. Property eligible for this exemption does not include electric transmission lines and interconnections or gas pipelines and interconnections appurtenant to the facility. Subd. 93. Electric generation facility; personal property. Notwithstanding subdivision 9, clause (a), attached machinery and other personal property that is part of a simple -cycle electric generation facility of more than 40 megawatts and less than 125 megawatts of installed capacity and that meets the requirements of this subdivision is exempt. At the time of construction, the facility must; (1) utilize natural gas as a primary fuel; (2) be located within two miles of parallel existing 36 -inch natural gas pipelines and an existing 115 -kilovolt high-voltage electric transmission line; (3) be designed to provide peaking, emergency backup, or contingency services; (4) satisfy a resource deficiency identified in an approved integrated resource plan filed under section 21613.2422; and (5) have an agreement with the host county, township, and school district for payment in lieu of personal property taxes to the host county, township, and school district for the operating life of the facility. Any amount distributed to the school district is not subject to the deductions under section 126021. Construction of the facility must be commenced after January 1, 2015, and before January 1, 2019. Property eligible for this exemption does not include electric transmission lines and interconnections or gas pipelines and interconnections appurtenant to the property or the facility. Solid. 96. Electric generation facility; personal property. (a) Notwithstanding subdivision 9, clause (a), and section 453.54, subdivision 20, attached machinery and other personal property that is part of a multiple reciprocating engine electric generation facility that adds more than 20 and less than 30 megawatts of installed capacity at a site where there is presently more than ten megawatts and fewer than 15 megawatts of installed capacity and that meets the requirements of this subdivision is exempt fiom taxation and from payments in lieu of taxation. At the time of construction, the facility must: (1) be designed to utilize natural gas as a primary fuel; (2) be owned and operated by a municipal power agency as defined in section 453.52, subdivision 8; (3) be located within one mile of an existing natural gas pipeline; (4) be designed to have black start capability and to furnish emergency backup power service to the city in which it is located; (5) satisfy a resource deficiency identified in an approved integrated resource plan filed under section 216B.2422; and (6) have received, by resolution, the approval of the governing bodies of the city and county in which it is located for the exemption of personal property provided by this subdivision. (b) Construction of the facility must be commenced after December 31, 2011, and before January 1, 2015. Property eligible for this exemption does not include (1) electric transmission lines and interconnections or gas pipelines and interconnections appurtenant to the property or the facility; or (ii) property located on the site on July 20, 2011. Solid. 99. Electric generation facility; personal property. (a) Notwithstanding subdivision 9, clause (a), and section 453.54, subdivision 20, attached machinery and other personal property which is part of au electric generation facility that exceeds five megawatts of installed capacity and meets the requirements of this subdivision is exempt. At the time of construction, the facility must be: (1) designed to utilize natural gas as a primary fuel; (2) owned and operated by a municipal power agency as defined in section 453.52, subdivision 8; (3) designed to utilize reciprocating engines paired with generators to produce electrical power; (4) located within the service territory of a municipal power agency's electrical municipal utility that serves load exclusively in a metropolitan county as defined in section 473.121, subdivision 4; and (5) designed to connect directly with a municipality's substation. 5R APPENDIX Repealed Minnesota Statutes: 17-3874 (b) Construction of the facility must be commenced after June 1, 2013, and before June 1, 2017. Property eligible for this exemption does not include electric transmission lines and interconnections or gas pipelines and interconnections appurtenant to the property or the facility. 272.0211 SLIDING SCALE MARKET VALUE EXCLUSION FOR ELECTRIC POWER GENERATION EFFICIENCY. Subdivision 1. Efficiency determination and certification. An owner or operator of a new or existing electric power generation facility, excluding wind energy conversion systems, may apply to the commissioner of revenue for a minket value exclusion on the property as provided for in this section. This exclusion shall apply only to the market value of the equipment of the facility, and shall not apply to the structures and the land upon which the facility is located. The commissioner of revenue shall prescribe the forms and procedures for this application. Upon receiving the application, the commissioner of revenue shall: (1) request the commissioner of commerce to make a determination of the efficiency of the applicant's electric power generation facility; and (2) shall develop an electronic means to notify interested parties when electric power generation facilities have filed an application. The commissioner of commerce shall calculate efficiency as the ratio of useful energy outputs to energy inputs, expressed as a percentage, based on the performance of the facility's equipment during normal full load operation. The commissioner must include in this formula the energy used in any on-site preparation of materials necessary to convert the materials into the fuel used to generate electricity, such as a process to gasify petrolemn coke. The commissioner shall use the Higher Heating Value (HHV) for all substances in the commissioner's efficiency calculations, except for wood for fuel in a biomass -eligible project under section 21613.2424; for these instances, the commissioner shall adjust the heating value to allow for energy consumed for evaporation of the moisture in the wood. The applicant shall provide the commissioner of commerce with whatever information the commissioner deems necessary to make the determination. Within 30 days of the receipt of the necessary information, the commissioner of commerce shall certify the findings of the efficiency determination to the commissioner of revenue and to the applicant. The commissioner of commerce shall determine the efficiency of the facility and certify the findings of that determination to the commissioner of revenue every two years thereafter from the date of the original certification. Subd. 2. Sliding scale exclusion. Based upon the efficiency determination provided by the commissioner of commerce as described in subdivision 1, the commissioner of revenue shall subtract eight percent of the taxable market value of the qualifying property for each percentage point that the efficiency of the specific facility, as determined by the commissioner of commerce, is above 40 percent. The reduction in taxable market value shall be reflected in the taxable market value of the facility beginning with the assessment year immediately following the determination. The commissioner shall develop an electronic means to notify interested parties of the qualifying facilities and their respective exclusion percentages after the efficiency determination is made by the Department of Commerce. For a facility that is assessed by the county in which the facility is located, the commissioner of revenue shall certify to the assessor of that county the percentage of the taxable market value of the facility to be excluded. Subd. 3. Revocation. (a) The commissioner of revenue shall revoke the market value reduction under this section, if. (1) the applicant exercises its right under federal law to require an electric utility to purchase power generated by the facility; and (2) the electric utility notifies the commissioner that the applicant has exercised its right to require purchase of power. The revocation is effective beginning the first assessment year after notification of the commissioner. (b) For purposes of this subdivision, the following terms mean: (1) "Federal law" is the federal Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act, United States Code, title 16, section 824a-3, and regulations promulgated under that section, including Code of Federal Regulations, title 18, sections 929.303 and 929.304. (2) "Electric utility" means an electric utility as defined in federal law described in clause (1). Solid. 4. Eligibility. An owner or operator of a new or existing electric power generation facility who offers electric power generated by the facility for sale is eligible for an exclusion under this section only if: (1) the owner or operator has received a certificate of need under section 216B.243, if required raider that section; C, APPENDIX Repealed Minnesota Statutes: 17-3874 (2) the public utilities commission finds that an agreement exists or a good faith offer has been made to sell the majority of the net power generated by the facility to an electric utility which has a demonstrated need for the power. A right of first refusal satisfies the good faith offer requirement. The commission shall have 90 days from the date the commission receives notice of the application under subdivision I to make this determination: (3) the electric utility has agreed in advance not to offer the electric power for resale to a retail customer located outside of the utility's assigned service area, or, if the utility is a generation and transmission cooperative electric association, the assigned service area of its members, unless otherwise permitted by law; and (4) for any facility that was not certified as eligible for an exclusion under subdivision 2 for property taxes payable in 2015, the facility must be converted from coal to an alternative fuel and must have a nameplate capacity prior to conversion of less than 75 megawatts. For the purposes of this subdivision, "electric utility" means an entity whose primary business function is to operate, maintain, or control equipment or facilities for providing electric service at retail or wholesale, and includes distribution cooperative electric associations, generation and transmission cooperative electric associations, municipal utilities, and public utilities as defined in section 21613.02, subdivision 4. 7R 02120/17 REVISOR LCB/Dl 17-3337 This Document can be made available in alteinatrve fronds upon i equest State of Minnesota HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1815 NINETIETH SESSION H. F. No. 02/27/2017 Authored by Newberger The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee an Job Gmwtlr and Energy Affordabbity Policy and Finance 1 t A bill for an act 1.2 relating to taxation; property; eliminating the personal property tax on electric 1 3 generation systems; instituting a new valuation method; authorizing replacement 14 aid; repealing exemptions; requiring a report; amending Minnesota Statutes 2016, 1 5 sections 21613.1621, subdivision 2; 216B.164, subdivision 2a; 216B.2424, 1 0 subdivision 5; 272.02, subdivisions 9, 10; 272.025, subdivision 1; 273.13, 1 7 subdivision 24; 273.1325, subdivision 1; 273.37, subdivision 1; proposing coding 1 8 for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapters 273; 477A; repealing Minnesota 19 Statutes 2016, sections 272.02, subdivisions 24, 29, 33, 44, 45, 47, 52, 54, 55, 56, 110 68, 69, 70, 71, 84, 89, 92, 93, 96, 99; 272.0211. 1 11 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA: 112 Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 2016, section 216B.1621, subdivision 2, is amended to read: 113 Subd.2. Commission approval. (a) The commission shall approve an agreement under 1 14 this section upon finding that: 1.15 (1) the proposed electric service power genefatien fiteility eottld feasonably be expeeted 116 to qualify for a market value exclusion midef seetiafi 2:72.0211 � 1 17 (2)_Dl the public utility has a contractual option to purchase electric power from the Its proposed facility; and 1 19 (3)_U2 the public utility can use the output from the proposed facility to meet its future l 20 need for power as demonstrated in the most recent resource plan filed with and approved 121 by the commission under section 216B.2422. 122 (b) Sections 216B.03, 216B.05, 216B.06, 21613.07, 216B.16, 216B.162, and 216B.23 123 do not apply to an agreement under this section. 124 EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective beginning with assessment year 2018. Section 1 02/20/17 REVISOR LCB/DI 17-3337 2.1 Sec. 2. Minnesota Statutes 2016, section 216B.164, subdivision 2a, is amended to read: 2.2 Subd..2a. Definitions. (a) For the purposes of this section, the following terms have the 2.3 meanings given them. 2.4 (b) "Aggregated meter" means a meter located on the premises of a customer's owned 2,5 or leased property that is contiguous with property containing the customer's designated 2.6 meter. 2.7 (c) "Capacity" means the number of megawatts alternating current (AC) at the point of 2.6 interconnection between a distributed generation facility and a utility's electric system. 2.9 (d) "Cogeneration" means a combined process whereby electrical and useful thermal 2.10 energy are produced simultaneously. 211 (e) "Contiguous property" means property owned or leased by the customer sharing a 2..12 common border, without regard to interruptions in contiguity caused by easements, public 2.13 thoroughfares, transportation rights-of-way, or utility rights-of-way. 2.14 (f) "Customer" means the person who is named on the utility electric bill for the premises. 2,15 (g) "Designated meter" means ameter that is physically attached to the customer's facility 2.16 that the customer -generator designates as the first meter to which net metered credits are 2.17 to be applied as the primary meter for billing purposes when the customer is serviced by 2.16 more than one meter. 2.19 (h) "Distributed generation" means a facility that: 2.20 (1) has a capacity of ten megawatts or less; 2.21 (2) is interconnected with a utility's distribution system, over which the commission has 2.22 jurisdiction; and 223 (3) generates electricity from natural gas, renewable fuel, or a similarly clean fuel, and 124 may include waste heat, cogeneration, or fuel cell technology. 2.25 (i) "High -efficiency distributed generation" means a distributed energy facility that has 226 a minimum efficiency of 40 percent, as calculated under Minnesota Statutes 2014, section 2.27 272.0211, subdivision 1. zea0)'Netmetered facility" means an electric generation facility constructed forthe purpose 229 of offsetting energy use through the use of renewable energy or high -efficiency distributed 2.30 generation sources. 231 (k) "Renewable energy" has the meaning given in section 21613.2411, subdivision 2. See. 2. 2 02/20/17 REVISOR LCR/DI 17-3337 3 1 (1) "Standby charge" means a charge imposed by an electric utility upon a distributed 3 2 generation facility for the recovery of costs for the provision of standby services, as provided 3 3 for in a utility's tariffs approved by the commission, necessary to make electricity service 14 available to the distributed generation facility. 35 EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective beginning with assessment year 2018. 36 Sec. 3. Minnesota Statutes 2016, section 21613.2424, subdivision 5, is amended to read: 37 Subd. 5. Mandate. (a) A public utility, as defined in section 216B.02, subdivision 4, 3 8 that operates a nuclear -powered electric generating plant within this state must construct 3 9 and operate, purchase, or contract to construct and operate (1) by December 31, 1998, 50 3 10 megawatts of electric energy installed capacity generatedby farm -grown closed-loop biomass 3 11 scheduled to be operational by December 31, 2001; and (2) by December 31, 1998, an 3 12 additional 75 megawatts of installed capacity so generated scheduled to be operational by 3 13 December 31.2002. 114 (b) Of the 125 megawatts of biomass electricity installed capacity required under this 315 subdivision, no more than 55 megawatts of this capacity may be provided by a facility that 3 16 uses poultry litter as its primary fuel source and any such facility: 3 17 (1) need not use biomass that complies with the definition in subdivision 1; 3 18 (2) must enter into a contract with the public utility for such capacity, that has an average 3 19 purchase price per megawatt hour over the life of the contract that is equal to or less than 3 20 the average purchase price per megawatt hour over the life of the contract in contracts 3 21 approved by the Public Utilities Commission before April 1, 2000, to satisfy the mandate 3 22 of this section, and file that contract with the Public Utilities Commission prior to September 323 1, 2000; and 324 (3) must schedule such capacity to be operational by December 31, 2002. 3 25 (c) Of the total 125 megawatts of biomass electric energy installed capacity required 3 26 under this section, no more than 75 megawatts may be provided by a single project. 3 27 (d) Of the 75 megawatts of biomass electric energy installed capacity required under 3 28 paragraph (a), clause (2), no more than 33 megawatts of this capacity may be provided by 329 a St. Paul district heating and cooling system cogeneration facility utilizing waste wood as 330 a primary fuel source. The St. Paul districtheating and cooling system cogeneration facility 131 need not use biomass that complies with the definition in subdivision 1. Sec 3 3 02/20/17 REVISOR LCB/DI 17-3337 4.1 (e) The public utility must accept and consider on an equal basis with other biomass 42 proposals: 4.3 (1) a proposal to satisfy the requirements of this section that includes a project that 44 exceeds the megawatt capacity requirements of either paragraph (a), clause (1) or (2), and 4.5 that proposes to sell the excess capacity to the public utility or to other purchasers; and 46 (2) a proposal for a new facility to satisfy more than ten but not more than 20 megawatts 47 of the electrical generation requirements by a small business -sponsored independent power 4.8 producer facility to be located within the northern quarter ofthe state, which means the area 4.9 located north of Constitutional Route No. 8 as described in section 161.114, subdivision 2, 410 and that utilizes biomass residue wood, sawdust, bark, chipped wood, or brush to generate 411 electricity. A facility described in this clause is not required to utilize biomass complying 4.12 with the definition in subdivision 1, but must be under construction by December 31, 2005. 4.13 (f) If a public utility files a contract with the commission for electric energy installed 414 capacity that uses poultry litter as its primary fuel source, the commission must do a 4.15 preliminary review of the contract to determine if it meets the purchase price criteria provided 4.16 in paragraph (b), clause (2). The commission shall perform its review and advise the parties 4.17 of its determination within 30 days of filing of such a contract by a public utility. A public 4.19 utility may submit by September 1, 2000, a revised contract to address the commission's 4.19 preliminary determination. 4.20 (g) The commission shall finally approve, modify, or disapprove no later than July 1, 4.21 2001, all contracts submitted by a public utility as of September 1, 2000, to meet the mandate 4.22 set forth in this subdivision. 423 (h) If a public utility subject to this section exercises an option to increase the generating 4.24 capacity of a project in a contract approved by the commission prior to April 25, 2000, to 4.25 satisfy the mandate in this subdivision, the public utility must notify the commission by 4.26 September 1, 2000, that it has exercised the option and include in the notice the amount of 4.227 additional megawatts to be generated under the option exercised. Any review by the 4.28 commission of the project after exercise of such an option shall bebased on the same criteria 429 used to review the existing contract. 4 30 11�d!''L :: i,TCi.�.."ta3EatFea 4.31 uftder section 272.02, subdivision 45. 4.32 EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective beginning with assessment vear 2018. Sec. 1 4 02/20/17 REVISOR LCB/DI 17-3337 5 l Sec. 4. Minnesota Statutes 2016, section 272.02, subdivision 9, is amended to read: 32 Subd. 9. Personal property; exceptions. Except for the taxable personal property 53 enumerated below, all personal property and the property described in section 272.03, 54 subdivision 1, paragraphs (c) and (d), shall be exempt. 5 5 The following personal property shall be taxable: 56 (a) personal property which is part of aiiele.etri generaP,ug,ur.,�s,.ss;atrevdisteibutlen 57 system o a pipeline system transporting or distributing water, gas, crude oil, or petroleum 5 s products or mains and pipes used in the distribution of steam or hot or chilled water for 59 heating or cooling buildings and structures; 510 (b) railroad docks and wharves which are part of the operating property of a railroad 5 11 company as defined in section 270.80; 5.12 (c) personal property defined in section 272.03, subdivision 2, clause (3); 513 (d) leasehold or other personal property interests which are taxed pursuant to section 5 14 272.0 1, subdivision 2; 273.124, subdivision 7; or 273.19, subdivision 1; or any other law 515 providing the property is taxable as if the lessee or user were the fee owner; 516 (e) manufactured homes and sectional structures, including storage sheds, decks, and 5.17 similar removable improvementsconstructed onthe site ofamanufactured home, sectional SAS structure, park hailer or travel trailer as provided in section 273.125, subdivision 8, paragraph 519 (f); and 5 20 (f) flight property as defined in section 270.071. 521 EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective beginning with assessment year 2018. 522 Sec. 5. Minnesota Statutes 2016, section 272.02, subdivision 10, is amended to read: 523 Subd. 10. Personal property used for pollution control. Personal property used 524 primarily for the abatement and control of air, water, or land pollution is exempt to the 525 extent that it is so used, and real property is exempt if it is used primarily for abatement and 5 26 control of air, water, or land pollution as part of an agricultural operation, as a part of a 527 centralized treatment and recovery facility operating under a permit issued by the Minnesota 528 Pollution Control Agency pursuant to chapters 115 and 116 and Minnesota Rules, parts 5 29 7001.0500 to 7001.0730, and 7045.0020 to 7045.1030, as a wastewater treatment facility 530 and for the treatment, recovery, and stabilization of metals, oils, chemicals, water, sludges, 5 31 or inorganic materials from hazardous industrial wastes, :,r as pffi of a ; eleetrie gerieratio 532 system. For purposes of this subdivision, personal property includes ponderous machinery Sec. S. 5 02/20/17 REVISOR LCB/DI 17-3337 6.1 and equipment used in a business or production activity that at common law is considered 6.2 real property. The real or personal property of an electric generation, transmission, 6.3 distribution, and substation system is not eligible for an exemption under this section. 6.a Any taxpayer requesting exemption of all or a portion of any real property or any 6.5 equipment or device, or part thereof, operated primarily for the control or abatement of air, 6.6 water, or land pollution shall file an application with the commissioner of revenue. The 6.7 earamissioner shall develels an elee"nie means to notify mtei-7ea�ed lsaAies when eleetrie 6.8 rc::c: bcu : d 1od oa np .cntio The Minnesota Pollution Control 6.9 Agency shall upon request of the commissioner furnish information and advice to the 610 commissioner. 6.11 The information and advice furnished by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency must 6.12 include statements as to whether the equipment, device, or real property meets a standard, 6.13 rule, criteria, guideline, policy, or order of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, and 6,14 whether the equipment, device, or real property is installed or operated in accordance with 6.15 it. On determining that property qualifies for exemption, the commissioner shall issue an 6.16 order exempting the property from taxation. The commissioner shall develop an electronic 6.17 means to notify interested parties when the commissioner has issued an order exempting 6 18 property from taxation under this subdivision. The equipment, device, or real property shall 6.19 continue to be exempt from taxation as long as the order issued by the commissioner remains 620 in effect. 6.21 EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective beginning with assessment year 2018. 6.22 Sec. 6. Minnesota Statutes 2016, section 272.025, subdivision 1, is amended to read: 6.23 Subdivision 1. Statement of exemption. (a) Except in the case of property owned by 624 the state of Minnesota or any political subdivision thereof, and property exempt from taxation 6.25 under section 272.02, subdivisions 9, 10, 13, 15, 18, 20, and 22 to 25, and at the times 6.26 provided in subdivision 3, a taxpayer claiming an exemption from taxation on property 627 described in section 272.02, subdivisions 2 to 33 32, must Me a statement of exemption 6.28 with the assessor of the assessment district in which the property is located. 6.29 (b) A taxpayer claiming an exemption from taxation on property described in section 6.30 272.02, subdivision 10, must file a statement of exemption with the commissioner ofrevenue, 6.31 on or before February 15 of each year for which the taxpayer claims an exemption. Sec. 6. 6 02/20/17 REVISOR LCB/DI 17-3337 71 (c) In case of sickness, absence or other disability or for good cause, the assessor or the 72 commissioner may extend the time for filing the statement of exemption for a period not to 73 exceed 60 days. 74 (d) The commissioner of revenue shall prescribe the form and contents of the statement 7 5 of exemption. 76 EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective beginning with assessment year 2017. 77 Sec. 7. 1273.1291 ELECTRIC GENERATION MACHINERY, TRANSMISSION, 7 s DISTRIBUTION, AND SUBSTATION; VALUATION. 79 Subdivision 1. Definitions. (a) For purposes of this section, the following terms having 7 10 the meanings given. 711 (b) 'Biomass generating system" means a device used to produce energy by the direct 712 combustion of carbon -based organisms. 713 (c) "Coal generating system" means a device whose primary purpose is the production 714 of electricity derived from the direct combustion of coal to produce steam. 715 (d) "Electric generation machinery" means all personal property of an electric generation 716 system used for the purpose of generating electricity, excluding municipal utilities, solar 7 17 energy generating systems, and wind energy conversion systems. 7 is (e) "Electric transmission line" means an exterior or underground line that transmits 719 high-voltage electricity with a capacity of at least 65 kilovolts or any electric line owned 720 by a utility that only operates in wholesale sales. Electric transmission line does not mean 721 any exterior or electric line owned or operated by a municipal utility. 722 (f) 'Electric distribution line" means an exterior or underground line that transmits energy 7.23 that operates at a voltage less than 65 kilovolts, excluding any line owned or operated by a 724 municipal utility or a rural electric distribution cooperative. 725 (g) 'Electric substation" means an assembly of equipment in an electric power system 7 2b through which electric energy is passed for transmission or transformation. 727 (h) 'Electric transmission line rate" equals voltage, in kilovolts, multiplied by ....... 728 (i) "Generation capacity rate" means the rate per kilowatt of nameplate capacity as 729 follows: 730 (1) $0 for hydroelectric generating systems; Sec. 7. 7 02/20/17 REVISOR LCB/DI 17-3337 81 (2) $5 for machinery used to generate electricity from biomass, natural gas, or nuclear 8.2 fuel generation systems; and 9.3 (3) $10 for machinery used to generate electricity from a coal or oil generation system 8.4 or any other fossil fuel. 8.5 (j) "Generation rate" means the rate per kilowatt-hour as follows: 8.5 (1) $0.05 for hydroelectric generating systems: 8.7 (2) $0.0525 for machinery used to generate electricity from biomass, natural gas, or 8.8 nuclear fuel generation systems; and 8.9 (3) $0.055 for machinery used to generate electricity from a coal or oil generation system 8.10 or any other fossil fuel. 8.11 (k) "Hydroelectric generating system" means a device whose primary purpose is the 8.12 production of electricity derived from flowing water. 8,13 (1) 'Nameplate capacity" means the maximum rated output of a generator, prime mover, 8.14 or other electric power production equipment under specificconditions designated by the 8.15 manufacturer. 8.16 (m) 'Natural gas generating system" means a device whose primary purpose is the 8.17 production of electricity derived from natural gas. 9.18 (n) 'Nuclear fuel generating system" means a device whose primary purpose is the 9.19 production of electricity generated by the use of the thermal energy released from the fission 3.20 of nuclear fuel in a reactor. 9.21 (o) "Oil generating system" means a device whose primary purpose is the production of 8,22 electricity derived by direct combustion of oil to produce steam 823 (p) "Primary fuel source" means the fuel source that is dominantly used by a facility in 924 the production of electricity. 9.25 (q) "Spent fuel' means fuel that has been irradiated in a nuclear reactor to the point 826 where it is no longer useful in sustaining a nuclear reaction. 827 (r) "Spent fuel tar base" means $150,000,000 per facility plus $100,000 per ton, or 8.28 fraction thereof, of spent fuel stored at a nuclear generating facility, or at any other site 8.29 elsewhere within the state. The value of spent fuel stored at a site other than at a nuclear 8.30 generating facility shall be apportioned to the jurisdiction where the spent fuel is stored. Sec. 7. 8 02/20/17 REVISOR LCB/DI 17-3337 9 1 Subd. 2. Rates; adjustment. The rates as provided in subdivision 1, paragraphs (h), (i), 92 and (j), and the factors in subdivision 3, paragraphs (d) and (e), shall be increased annually 9 3 by an amount equal to the percentage change, if any, in the gross domestic product for 94 nonresidential investment for the current year as compared to the previous year, as reported 95 on Table 1.1.1 by the United States Bureau of Economic Analysis. A rate change pursuant 96 to this section is effective for the following taxes payable year. 9 7 Subd. 3. Electric generation tax base. (a) The commissioner shall annually calculate 9 a the electric generation tax base under this section. An electric generating system with a 99 capacity of one megawatt or less as determined corder subdivision 4 is exempt from this 9.10 section. The commissioner shall calculate the electric generation tax base of the facility 911 using the applicable capacity and generation rates for each generator based on the electric 9 12 generation system's primary fuel source. 9.13 (b) The electric generation tax base for property described in subdivision 1, paragraph 9.14 (d), is equal to the sum of. (1) its nameplate capacity multiplied by its generation capacity 9 t5 rate; (2) the average of its electric energy production as reported to the commissioner of 9.16 revenue for the immediately preceding five years, multiplied by its generation rate; and (3) 917 its spent fuel tax base. For an electric generator that has been operational for less than the 9.1 x immediately preceding five years, the average of its electric energy production is the average 919 of its electric energy production for the time period since the facility commenced operation. 920 (c) The electric transmission line tax base for property described in subdivision 1, 911 paragraph (e), is equal to the number of miles of electric transmission lines located within 922 the taxing jurisdiction, multiplied by the electric transmission line rate. 923 (d) The electric substation tax base for property described in subdivision 1, paragraph 924 (g), is equal to the sum of the capacity of a substation, measured in megavolt -amperes, 925 multiplied by ....... 9 26 (e) The electric distribution line tax base for property described in subdivision 1, 927 paragraph (f), is equal to the number of customers in the taxing jurisdiction that receives 9 28 an electric distribution, multiplied by ....... 929 Subd. 4. Electric generating systems; size. The total capacity of an electric generating 930 system, pursuant to this section, shall be determined by combining all generators of each 931 fuel type within each facility, based on the information reported to the commissioner of q 32 revenue as required under subdivision 5. 933 Subd. 5. Generating systems; reports. (a) An owner of an electric generating system, 934 transmission and distribution lines, or electric substations subject to taxation wider this See 7 9 02/20/17 REVISOR LCB/DI 17-3337 10.1 section must file a report with the commissioner of revenue annually on or before January M2 2 15 detailing, if applicable: (1) the amount of electricity produced by each generator in the 103 previous calendar year as reported to the United States Energy Information Administration; 1 o.4 (2) the location, length, and capacity of all transmission and distribution lines; and (3) the 105 location and capacity of all electric substations, including individual transformers. The IM commissioner shall prescribe the form of the report, and the report must contain the 10.7 information required by the commissioner to determine the tax base under this section. The 10s commissioner may, for good cause, extend the time for filing the report as required under 10.9 this section. The extension may not exceed 15 days. 10,10 (b) If an owner of an electric generating system fails to file the report by the due date, l o. i 1 the commissioner of revenue shall determine the tax base upon the sum of: (1) the nameplate 10.12 capacity of the system's generators multiplied by the generation capacity rate for the 10.13 generator's primary fuel source; (2) a production of 100 percent of annual capacity of the 10.14 facility multiplied by the generation rate for the primary fuel source; and (3) the greater of 1015 the spent fuel tax base from the prior year multiplied by two, or the amount as reported by 10.16 the United States Energy Information Administration, multiplied by two. 10.17 (c) If an owner of an electric transmission or distribution line, or an electric substation, 101 a fails to file the report by the due date, the commissioner of revenue shall determine the tax 10.19 based upon the prior year's tax base multiplied by two. 10.20 Subd. 6. Notification to the counties. The commissioner of revenue shall annually, on 10.21 or before March 31, notify the county auditor of the county where the electric generating, 1022 transmission, distribution, and substation system is located of: (1) the electric generation 10.23 tax base; and (2) the electric generation tax base multiplied by two percent to be added to 10.24 the jurisdiction's nettax capacity base. 10.35 Subd. 7. Omitted or undervalued property. If an electric generation, transmission, 1026 distribution, and substation system is omitted in the determination of the tax base and thereby 10 27 escapes taxation, or if the system is discovered to have been undervalued or, if the capacity 1o.28 or production has been underreported, the commissioner of revenue shall determine the tax 1 a 29 base for the year or years omitted. The commissioner of revenue shall, on or before March 10 m 31, notify the county auditor of the county where the electric generation transmission, 10.31 distribution, and substation system is located of the omitted or underreported tax base, and 10.32 the county auditor shall extend against the owner arrearage of tares properly due. The 1033 authority of the commissioner of revenue to determine the tax base under this section is 10,34 limited to the immediately preceding five vears. Sec. 7. 10 02/20/17 REVISOR LCB/DI 17-3337 EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective beginning with assessment year 2018. 11 2 Sec. 8. Minnesota Statutes 2016, section 273.13, subdivision 24, is amended to read: 11 3 Subd. 24, Class 3. Commercial and industrial property and utility real and personal 114 property is class 3a. 11 s (1) Except as otherwise provided, each parcel of commercial, industrial, or utility real 11 e property has a classification rate of 1.5 percent of the first tier of market value, and 2.0 11 7 percent of the remaining market value. In the case of contiguous parcels of property owned 11 s by the same person or entity, only the value equal to the first-tier value of the contiguous 119 parcels qualifies for the reduced classification rate, except that contiguous parcels owned 11 io by the same person or entity shall be eligible for the first-tier value classification rate on 11 ii each separate business operated by the owner of the property, provided the business is 11 12 housed in a separate structure. For the purposes of this subdivision, the first tier means the 11 13 first $150,000 of market value. Real property owned in fee by a utility for transmission line 11.14 right-of-way shall be classified at the classification rate for the higher tier. 11 is For purposes of this subdivision, parcels are considered to be contiguous even if they 11.16 are separated from each other by a road, street, waterway, or other similar intervening type 11 17 of property. Connections between parcels that consist of power lines or pipelines do not it is cause the parcels to be contiguous. Property owners who have contiguous parcels of property it 1y that constitute separate businesses that may qualify for the first-tier classification rate shall 11 20 notify the assessor by July 1, for treatment beginning in the following taxes payable year. 1121 (2) All personal property that is:(i) part of an electric 1122 , " (ipart of a pipeline system transporting or distributing water, 11 23 gas, crude oil, orpetroleum products; and (ii)ii not described in clause (3), and all railroad 11 24 operating property has a classification rate as provided under clause (1) for the first tier of I 1 25 market value and the remaining market value. In the case of multiple parcels in one county 11 26 that are owned by one person or entity, only one first tier amount is eligible for the reduced it 27 rate. It 28 (3) The entire market value of personal property that is: (i) tools, implements, a_a u 29 a,= stools, 11 30 implements, and machinery of a pipeline system transporting or distributing water, gas, 1131 crude oil, or petroleum products; or (iii)ii the mains and pipes used in the distribution of 1132 steam or hot or chilled water for heating or cooling buildings, has a classification rate as 1133 provided under clause (1) for the remaining market value in excess of the first tier. Sec. 8. 11 02/20/17 REVISOR LCB/DI 17-3337 12,1 EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective beRinning with assessment vear 2018. 12.2 Sec. 9. Minnesota Statutes 2016, section 273.1325, subdivision 1, is amended to read: 123 Subdivision 1. Computation. The Department of Revenue must annually conduct an 12.4 assessment/sales ratio study of the taxable property in each county, city, town, and school 12.5 district in accordance with the procedures in subdivisions 2 and 3. Based upon the results 12.6 of this assessment/sales ratio study, the Department of Revenue must determine an equalized 12.7 net tax capacity for the various classes of taxable property in each taxing district, plus the 12B value established under section 273.129, the aggregate of which is designated as the adjusted 12.9 net tax capacity. The adjusted net tax capacity must be reduced by the captured tax capacity tato of tax increment di stricts under section 469.177, subdivision 2, fiscal disparities contribution 12.11 tax capacities under sections 276A.06 and 473F.08, and the tax capacity of transmission 12.12 lines required to be subtracted from the local tax base under section 273.425; and increased 1213 by fiscal disparities distribution tax capacities under sections 276A.06 and 473F.08. The 12.14 adjusted net tax capacities shall be determined using the net tax capacity percentages in 12.15 effect for the assessment year following the assessment year of the study. The Department 12.16 of Revenue must make whatever estimates are necessary to account for changes in the 12.17 classification system. The Department of Revenue may incur the expense necessary to make 12.18 the determinations. The commissioner ofrevenue may reimburse any county or governmental 12.19 official for requested services performed in ascertaining the adjusted net tax capacity. On 1220 or before March 15 annually, the Department of Revenue shall file with the chair of the Tax 12.21 Committee of the house of representatives and the chair of the Committee on Taxes and 12.22 Tax laws of the senate a report of adjusted net tax capacities for school districts. On or 12.23 before June 30 annually, the Department of Revenue shall file its final report on the adjusted 12.24 net tax capacities for school districts established by the previous year's assessments and the 1125 current year's net tax capacity percentages with the commissioner of education and each 12.26 county auditor for those school districts for which the auditor has the responsibility for 12.27 determination of local tax rates. A copy of the report so filed shall be mailed to the clerk of 1123 each school district involved and to the county assessor or supervisor of assessments of the 1229 county or counties in which each school district is located. 1230 EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective beEinnng with assessment vear 2018. 12.31 Sec. 10. Minnesota Statutes 2016, section 273.37, subdivision 1, is amended to read 12.32 Subdivision 1. Listing and assessment where situated. Personal property of electric 12.33 light and power companies, and other individuals and partnerships supplying electric light See. 10. 12 02/20/17 REVISOR I-CBNI 17-3337 131 and power, having a fixed situs outside of the corporate limits of cities shall be listed and 13 2 assessed in the district where situated, except as otherwise provided. 13 3 (b) Notwithstanding any other law to the contrary, the nonoperating property, and 134 operating real property that is part of an electric generation system, shall be listed and 13 5 assessed by the local or county assessor. 13 6 EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective beginning with assessment year 2018. 13 7 Sec. 11.1477A.231 ELECTRIC GENERATION, TRANSMISSION, DISTRIBUTION, 138 AND SUBSTATION REPLACEMENT AID. 13 9 Subdivision 1. Definitions. (a) For purposes of this section, the following terms have 13 to the meanings given. 13 11 (b) "Electric distribution line" means an exterior or underground line that transmits 13 t2 energy that operates at a voltage less than 65 kilovolts, excluding any line owned or operated 13 t3 by a municipal utility, or a rural electric distribution cooperative. 13 to (c) "Electric substation" means an assembly of equipment in an electric power system 13 15 through which electric energy is passed for transmission, transformation, or distribution. 13 16 (d) "Electric transmission line" means an exterior or underground line that transmits 13 17 high-voltage electricity with a capacity of at least 65 kilovolts or any electric line owned 131 s by a utility that only operates in wholesale sales. Electric transmission line does not mean 13 i e any exterior or electric line owned or operated by a municipal utility. 13 20 (e) "Local unit" means a home rule charter or statutory city, county, or town. 13 21 Subd. 2. Aid eligibility; payment. (a) For aids payable in 2019 only, replacement aid 13 22 under this section equals: (1) the net tax capacity of all personal property of all electric 13 23 generation, transmission and distribution lines, and substation systems as determined for 13 24 assessment year 2018 multiplied by the payable 2019 local tax rate; minus (2) the net tax 1325 capacity in 2017 of all electric generation, transmission or distribution lines, and substation 1326 systems as determined under section 273.129, multiplied by the payable 2018 local tax rate. 13 27 The aid payment may not be less than zero. 13 29 (b) For aids payable in 2020 and thereafter, if the electric generation, transmission, 1329 distribution, and substation tax base is: (1) reduced by more than ten percent as compared 13 30 to the previous year; and (2) the reduction is more than 0.5 percent of a local unit's total tax 13 31 base, aid shall equal the difference between the prior assessment year multiplied by the Sec 11 13 02/20/17 REVISOR LCB/DI 17-3330 14.1 current year local tax rate and the assessment two years prior multiplied by the prior year 142 local tax rate. 143 (c) If paragraph (b) does not apply, aid shall be equal to (1) 95 percent of the prior year's 14.4 aid; minus (2) the difference between the current year's tax base from the prior year's tax 14.5 base. Aid shall cease if aid is certified to be less than 0.05 percent of the current assessment 146 year multiplied by the local tax rate. 14.7 (d) The commissioner shall compute the amount of replacement aid payable to each 14.8 local unit under this section. On or before August 1 of each year, the commissioner shall 149 certify the amount of replacement aid computed for aids payable in the following year for t4 to eachrecipient local unit. The commissioner shall pavreplacement aid to localunits annually 14.11 at the time provided for the second installment of local government aid under section 14.12 477A.015. 14.13 (e) The commissioner may require counties and owners of electric generation facilities, 14, t4 transmission and distribution lines, and substations to provide any documentation necessary 14.15 to administer this section. 14.16 Subd. 3. Appropriation. An amount sufficient to pay transition aid under this section 14.17 is annually appropriated to the commissioner of revenue from the general fund. 14.18 EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective beginning with aids payable in 2019. 14.19 Sec. 12. REPEALER. 1420 Minnesota Statutes 2016, sections 272.02, subdivisions 24, 29, 33, 44, 45, 47, 52, 54, 14.21 55, 56, 68, 69, 70, 71, 84, 89, 92, 93, 96, and 99; and 272.0211, are repealed. 14.22 EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective beginning with assessment year 2017. See. 12. 14 APPENDIX Repealed Minnesota Statutes: 17-3337 272.02 EXEMPT PROPERTY. Subd. 24. Solar energy generating systems. Personal property consisting of solar energy generating systems, as defined in section 272.0295, is exempt. If the real property upon which a solar energy generating system is located is used primarily for solar energy production subject to the production tax under section 272.0295, the real property shall be classified as class 3a. If the real property upon which a solar energy generating system is located is not used primarily for solar energy production subject to the production tax under section 272.0295, the real property shall be classified without regard to the system. Subd. 29. Cogeneration systems; certain property. Notwithstanding subdivision 9, clause (a), attached machinery and other personal property which is part of a facility containing a cogeneration system as described in section 216B. 166, subdivision 2, paragraph (a), is exempt if the cogeneration system has met the following criteria: (i) the system utilizes natural gas as a primary fuel and the cogenerated steam initially replaces steam generated from existing thermal boilers utilizing coal; (ii) the facility developer is selected as a result of a procurement process ordered by the Public Utilities Commission; and (iii) construction of the facility is commenced after July 1, 1994, and before July 1, 1997. Subd. 33. Electric generation facility personal property. Notwithstanding subdivision 9, clause (a), attached machinery and other personal property which is part of a simple -cycle combustion -fir bine electric generation facility that exceeds 250 megawatts of installed capacity and that meets the requirements of this subdivision is exempt. At the time of construction, the facility must: (i) not be owned by a public utility as defined in section 216B.02, subdivision 4; (ii) utilize natural gas as a primary fuel; (iii) be located within 20 miles of the intersection of an existing 42 -inch (outside diameter) natural gas pipeline and a 345 -kilovolt high-voltage electric transmission line; and (iv) be designed to provide peaking, emergency backup, or contingency services, and have received a certificate of need pursuant to section 21613.243 demonstrating demand for its capacity. Construction of the facility must be commenced after July 1, 1999, and before July 1, 2003. Property eligible for this exemption does not include electric transmission lines and interconnections or gas pipelines and interconnections appurtenant to the property or the facility. Subd. 44. Electric generation facility personal property. Notwithstanding subdivision 9, clause (a), attached machinery and other personal property which is part of a simple -cycle combustion -turbine electric generation facility that exceeds 250 megawatts of installed capacity and that meets the requirements of this subdivision is exempt. At the time of construction, the facility must: (1) utilize natural gas as a primary fuel; (2) be located within 20 miles of parallel existing 16 -inch and 12 -inch (outside diameter) natural gas pipelines and a 345 -kilovolt high-voltage electric transmission line; and (3) be designed to provide peaking, emergency backup, or contingency services, and have received a certificate of need under section 21613.243 demonstrating demand for its capacity. Construction of the facility must be commenced after January 1, 2000, and before January I, 2004. Property eligible for this exemption does not include electric transmission lines and interconnections or gas pipelines and interconnections appurtenant to the property or the facility. Subd. 45. Biomass electrical generation facility; personal property. Notwithstanding subdivision 9, clause (a), attached machinery and other personal property which is part of an electrical generating facility that meets the requirements of this subdivision is exempt. At the time of construction, the facility must: (1) be designed to utilize biomass as established in section 216B.2424 as a primary fuel source; and (2) be constructed for the purpose of generating power at the facility that will be sold pursuant to a contract approved by the Public Utilities Commission in accordance with the biomass mandate imposed under section 216B.2424. Construction of the facility must be commenced after January 1, 2000, and before December 31, 2005. Property eligible for this exemption does not include electric transmission lines and interconnections or gas pipelines and interconnections appurtenant to the property or facility. Subd. 47. Poultry litter biomass generation facility; personal property. Notwithstanding subdivision 9, clause (a), attached machinery and other personal property which is part of an electrical generating facility that meets the requirements of this subdivision is exempt. At the time of construction, the facility must: 110 APPENDIX Repealed Minnesota Statutes: 17-3337 (1) be designed to utilize poultry litter as a primary fuel source; and (2) be constructed for the purpose of generating power at the facility that will be sold pursuant to a contract approved by the Public Utilities Commission in accordance with the biomass mandate imposed under section 21613.2424. Construction of the facility must be commenced after January 1, 2003, and before December 31, 2005. Property eligible for this exemption does not include electric transmission lines and interconnections or gas pipelines and interconnections appurtenant to the property or the facility. Subd. 52. Electric generation facility; personal property. Notwithstanding subdivision 9, clause (a), attached machinery and other personal property which is part of a simple -cycle combustion -turbine electric generation facility of more than 40 megawatts and less than 50 megawatts of installed capacity and that meets the requirements of this subdivision is exempt. At the time of construction, the facility must: (1) utilize natural gas as a primary fuel; (2) be located within two miles of parallel existing 36 -inch natural gas pipelines and an existing 115 -kilovolt high-voltage electric transmission line; (3) be designed to provide peaking, emergency backup, or contingency services; and (4) satisfy a resource deficiency identified in an approved integrated resource plan filed under section 21613.2422. Construction of the facility must be commenced after January 1, 2001, and before January 1, 2005. Property eligible for this exemption does not include electric transmission lines and interconnections or gas pipelines and interconnections appurtenant to the property or the facility. Subd. 54. Small biomass electric generation facility; personal property. (a) Subject to paragraph (b), notwithstanding subdivision 9, clause (a), attached machinery and other personal property which is part of an electrical generating facility that meets the requirements of this subdivision is exempt. At the time of construction the facility must: (1) have a generation capacity of less than 25 megawatts; (2) provide process heating needs in addition to electrical generation; and (3) utilize agricultural by-products from the malting process and other biomass fuels as its primary fuel source. Construction of the facility must be commenced after January 1, 2002, and before January 1, 2009. Property eligible for this exemption does not include electric transmission lines and interconnections or gas pipelines and interconnections appurtenant to the property or facility. (b) The exemption under this subdivision is contingent on approval by the governing bodies of the municipality and county in which the electric generation facility is located. Subd. 55. Electric generation facility; personal property. Notwithstanding subdivision 9, clause (a), attached machinery and other personal property which is part of an electric generating facility that meets the requirements of this subdivision is exempt. At the time of construction, the facility must (i) be eligible to be designated as an innovative energy project under section 21613.1694, except that, notwithstanding anything to the contrary in section 216B. 1694, a project may include gas-fired generating facilities that are adaptable for subsequent incorporation into a facility that uses coal as a primary fuel, provided that this exception applies only to the eligibility for exemption under this section, (ii) be within a tax relief area as defined in section 273.134, (iii) have access to existing railroad infrastructure within less than three miles, (iv) have received by resolution approval from the governing body of the county and township or city in which the proposed facility is to be located for the exemption of personal property under this subdivision, and (v) be designed to host at least 500 megawatts of electrical generation. Construction of the first 100 megawatts of the facility must be commenced after January 1, 2006, and before January 1, 2012. Construction of up to an additional 750 megawatts of generation must be commenced before January 1, 2015. Property eligible for this exemption does not include electric transmission lines and interconnections or gas pipelines and interconnections appurtenant to the property or the facility. To qualify for an exemption under this subdivision, the owner of the electric generation facility must have an agreement with the host county, township or city, and school district, for payment in lieu of personal property taxes to the host county, township or city, and school district. Subd. 56. Electric generation facility; personal property. (a) Notwithstanding subdivision 9, clause (a), attached machinery and other personal property which is part of a combined -cycle combustion -turbine electric generation facility that exceeds 300 megawatts of installed capacity and that meets the requirements of this subdivision is exempt. At the time of construction, the facility must: (1) be designed to utilize natural gas as a primary fuel; (2) not be. owned by a public utility as defined in section 21613.02, subdivision 4; 2R APPENDIX Repealed Minnesota Statutes: 17-3337 (3) be located within five miles of an existing natural gas pipeline and within four miles of an existing electrical transmission substation; (4) be located outside the metropolitan area as defined under section 473.121, subdivision 2; and (5) be designed to provide energy and ancillary services and have received a certificate of need under section 216B.243. (b) Construction of the facility must be commenced after January 1, 2004, and before January 1, 2007, except that property eligible for this exemption includes any expansion of the facility that also meets the requirements of paragraph (a), clauses (1) to (5), without regard to the date that construction of the expansion commences. Property eligible for this exemption does not include electric transmission lines and interconnections or gas pipelines mid interconnections appurtenant to the property or the facility. Subd. 68. Electric generation facility; personal property. (a) Notwithstanding subdivision 9, clause (a), attached machinery and other personal property which is pmt of a simple -cycle combustion -turbine electric generation facility that exceeds 290 megawatts of installed capacity and that meets the requirements of this subdivision is exempt. At the time of construction, the facility must: (1) be designed to utilize natural gas as a primary fuel; (2) not be owned by a public utility as defined in section 216B.02, subdivision 4; (3) be located within 15 miles of an existing natural gas pipeline and within five miles of an existing electrical transmission substation; (4) be located outside the metropolitan area as defined under section 473.121, subdivision 2; (5) be designed to provide peaking capacity energy and ancillary services and have satisfied all of the requirements under section 21613.243; and (6) have received, by resolution, the approval from the governing body of the county, city, and school district in which the proposed facility is to be located for the exemption of personal property under this subdivision. (b) Construction of the facility must be commenced after January 1, 2005, and before January 1, 2009. Property eligible for this exemption does not include electric transmission lines and interconnections or gas pipelines and interconnections appurtenant to the property or the facility. Subd. 69. Electric generation facility personal property. (a) Notwithstanding subdivision 9, clause (a), and section 453.54, subdivision 20, attached machinery and other personal property which is part of an electric generation facility that exceeds 150 megawatts of installed capacity mid meets the requirements of this subdivision is exempt. At the time of construction, the facility must: (1) be designed to utilize natural gas as a primary fuel; (2) be owned and operated by a municipal power agency as defined in section 453.52, subdivision 8: (3) have received the certificate of need under section 216B.243; (4) be located outside the metropolitan area as defined under section 473.121, subdivision 2; and (5) be designed to be a combined -cycle facility, although initially the facility will be operated as a simple -cycle combustion turbine. (b) To quality under this subdivision, an agreement must be negotiated between the municipal power agency and the host city, for a payment in lieu of property taxes to the host city. (c) Construction of the facility must be commenced after January 1, 2004, and before January 1, 2006. Property eligible for this exemption does not include electric transmission lines and interconnections or gas pipelines and interconnections appurtenant to the property or the facility. Subd. 70. Electric generation facility; personal property. Notwithstanding subdivision 9, clause (a), attached machinery and other personal property which is part of an existing simple -cycle, combustion-tuabine electric generation facility that exceeds 300 megawatts of installed capacity and that meets the requirements of this subdivision is exempt. At the time of the construction, the facility must: (1) be designed to utilize natural gas as a primary fuel; (2) be owned by a public utility as defined in section 21613.02, subdivision 4, and be located at or interconnected with an existing generating plant of the utility; (3) be designed to provide peaking, emergency backup, or contingency services; (4) satisfy a resource need identified in an approved integrated resource plan filed under section 216B.2422; and 311 APPENDIX Repealed Minnesota Statutes: 17-3337 (5) have received, by resolution, the approval from the governing body of the county and the city for the exemption of personal property under this subdivision. Construction of the facility expansion must be commenced after January 1, 2004, and before January 1, 2005. Property eligible for this exemption does not include electrictransmission lines and interconnections or gas pipelines and interconnections appurtenant to the property or the facility. Subd. 71. Electric generation facility; personal property. (a) Notwithstanding subdivision 9, clause (a), attached machinery and other personal property which is part of a simple -cycle combustion -turbine electric generation facility that exceeds 150 megawatts of installed capacity and that meets the requirements of this subdivision is exempt. At the time of construction, the facility must: (1) utilize natural gas as a primary fuel; (2) be owned by an electric generation and transmission cooperative; (3) be located within five miles of parallel existing 12 -inch and 16 -inch natural gas pipelinesand a 69 -kilovolt high-voltage electric transmission line; (4) be designed to provide peaking, emergency backup, or contingency services; (5) have received a certificate of need under section 216B.243 demonstrating demand for its capacity; and (6) have received by resolution the approval from the governing body of the county and township in which the proposed facility is to be located for the exemption of personal property under this subdivision. (b) Construction of the facility most be commenced after July 1, 2005, and before January 1, 2009. Property eligible for this exemption does not. include electric transmission lines and interconnections or gas pipelines and interconnections appurtenant to the property or the facility. Subd. 84. Electric generation facility; personal property. Notwithstanding subdivision 9, clause (a), attached machinery and other personal property which is part of a 10.3 megawatt run -of -the -river hydroelectric generation facility and that meets the requirements of this subdivision is exempt. At the time of construction, the facility must: (1) utilize between 12 and 16 turbine generators at a dam site existing on Much 31, 1994; (2) be located on land within 3,000 feet of a 13.8 kilovolt distribution substation; and (3) be eligible to receive a renewable energy production incentive payment under section 216C.41. Construction of the facility must be commenced after April 30, 2006, and before January 1, 2011. Property eligible for this exemption does not include electric transmission lines and interconnections or gas pipelines and interconnections appurtenant to the property or the facility. Subd. 89. Electric generation facility; personal property. (a) Notwithstanding subdivision 9, paragraph (a), attached machinery and other personal property which is part of a simple -cycle combustion -turbine electric generation facility that exceeds 150 megawatts of installed capacity and that meets the requirements of this subdivision is exempt. At the time of construction, the facility must: (1) utilizenatural gas as a primary fuel; (2) be owned by an electric generation and transmission cooperative; (3) be located within one mile of an existing 16 -inch natural gas pipeline and a 69 -kilovolt and a 230 -kilovolt high-voltage electric transmission line; (4) be designed to provide peaking, emergency backup, or contingency services; (5) have received a certificate of need under section 216B.243 demonstrating demand for its capacity; and (6) have received by resolution the approval from the governing bodies of the county and the city in which the proposed facility is to be located for the exemption of personal property under this subdivision. (b) Construction of the facility must be commenced after January 1, 2008, and before. January 1, 2012. Property eligible for this exemption does not include electric transmission lines and interconnections or gas pipelines and interconnections appurtenant to the property or the facility. Subd. 92. Electric generation facility; personal property. (a) Notwithstanding subdivision 9, clause (a), attached machinery and other personal property that is part of an electric generation facility that exceeds 150 megawatts of installed capacity, does not exceed 780 megawatts of summer capacity, and meets the requirements of this subdivision is exempt. At the start of construction, the facility must: (1) be designed to utilize natural gas as a primary fuel; (2) be owned by an entity other than a public utility as defined in section 216B.02, subdivision 4; 4R APPENDIX Repealed Minnesota Statutes: 17-3337 (3) be located within five miles of two or more interstate natural gas pipelines; (4) be located within one mile of an existing electrical transmission substation with operating alternating current voltages of 115 kV, 345 kV, and 500 kV; (5) be designed to provide electrical capacity, energy, and ancillary services; (6) have satisfied all of the requirements wider section 21613.243; (7) have executed an interconnection agreement with the Midwest Independent System Operator that does not require the acquisition of more than one mile of new electric transmission right-of-way within the county where the facility is located, and does not provide for any other new routes or corridors for future electric transmission lines in the county where the facility is located; (8) be located in a county with an essential services and transmission services ordinance; (9) have signed a development agreement with the county board in the county in which the facility is located. The development agreement must be adopted by a two-thirds vote of the county board, and must contain provisions ensuring: (i) the facility is designed to use effluent from a wastewater treatment facility as its preferred water source if it includes any combined -cycle units, and will not seek an exemption from legislative approval under section 103G.265, subdivision 3, paragraph (b); mid (ii) all processed wastewater discharge will be colocated with the outfall of a wastewater treatment facility; (10) have signed a development agreement with the township board in the township in which the facility is located containing provisions ensuring that noise and visual impacts of the facility we mitigated. The development agreement must be adopted by a two-thirds vote of the township board; and (11) have an agreement with the host comity, township, and school district for payment in lieu of personal property taxes to the host county, township, and school district for a total amount not to exceed $600,000 per year for the operating life of the facility. Any mount distributed to the school district is not subject to the deductions under section 126C.21, (b) Construction of the facility must begin after March 1, 2010, and before March 1, 2014. Property eligible for this exemption does not include electric transmission lines and interconnections or gas pipelines and interconnections appurtenant to the facility. Subd. 93. Electric generation facility; personal property. Notwithstanding subdivision 9, clause (a), attached machinery and other personal property that is pmt of a simple -cycle electric generation facility of more than 40 megawatts and less than 125 megawatts of installed capacity and that meets the requirements of this subdivision is exempt. At the time of construction, the facility must: (1) utilize natural gas as a primary fuel; (2) be located within two miles of parallel existing 36 -inch natural gas pipelines and an existing 115 -kilovolt high-voltage electric transmission line; (3) be designed to provide peaking, emergency backup, or contingency services; (4) satisfy a resource deficiency identified in an approved integrated resource plan filed under section 21613.2422; and (5) have an agreement with the best county, township, and school district for payment in lieu of personal property tares to the host county, township, and school district for the operating life of the facility. Any amount distributed to the school district is not subject to the deductions under section 126C.21. Construction of the facility must be commenced after January 1, 2015, and before January 1, 2019. Property eligible for this exemption does not include electric transmission lines and interconnections or gas pipelines and interconnections appurtenant to the property or the facility. Solid. 96. Electric generation facility; personal property. (a) Notwithstanding subdivision 9, clause (a), and section 453.54, subdivision 20, attached machinery and other personal property that is pat of a multiple reciprocating engine electric generation facility that adds more than 20 and less than 30 megawatts of installed capacity at a site where there is presently more than ten megawatts and fewer than 15 megawatts of installed capacity mid that meets the requirements of this subdivision is exempt from taxation and from payments in lieu of taxation. At the time of construction, the facility must: (1) be designed to utilize natural gas as a primary fuel; (2) be owned and operated by a municipal power agency as defined in section 453.52, subdivision 8; (3) be located within one mite of an existing natural gas pipeline; (4) be designed to have black start capability and to furnish emergency backup power service to the city in which it is located; (5) satisfy a resource deficiency identified in an approved integrated resource plan filed under section 216B.2422; and W, APPENDIX Repealed Minnesota Statutes: 17-3337 (6) have received, by resolution, the approval of the governing bodies of the city and county in which it is located for the exemption of personal property provided by this subdivision. (b) Construction of the facility must be commenced after December 31, 2011, and before January 1, 2015. Property eligible for this exemption does not include (i) electric transmission lines and interconnections or gas pipelines and interconnections appurtenant to the property or the facility; or (ii) property located on the site on July 20, 2011. Subd. 99. Electric generation facility; personal property. (a) Notwithstanding subdivision 9, clause (a), and section 453.54, subdivision 20, attached machinery and other personal property which is part of an electric generation facility that exceeds five megawatts of installed capacity and meets the requirements of this subdivision is exempt. At the time of construction, the facility must be: (1) designed to utilize natural gas as a primary fuel; (2) owned and operated by a municipal power agency as defined in section 453.52, subdivision 8; (3) designed to utilize reciprocating engines paired with generators to produce electrical power; (4) located within the service territory of a municipal power agency's electrical municipal utility that serves load exclusively in a metropolitan county as defined in section 473.121, subdivision 4; and (5) designed to connect directly with a municipality's substation. (b) Construction of the facility must be commenced after June 1, 2013, and before June 1, 2017. Property eligible for this exemption does not include electric transmission lines and interconnections or gas pipelines and interconnections appurtenant to the property or the facility. 272.0211 SLIDING SCALE MARKET VALUE EXCLUSION FOR ELECTRIC POWER GENERATION EFFICIENCY. Subdivision 1. Efficiency determination and certification. An owner or operator of a new or existing electric power generation facility, excluding wind energy conversion systems, may apply to the commissioner of revenue for a market value exclusion on the property as provided for in this section. This exclusion shall apply only to the market value of the equipment of the facility, and shall not apply to the structures and the land upon which the facility is located. The commissioner of revenue shall prescribe the forms and procedures for this application. Upon receiving the application, the commissioner of revenue shall: (1) request the commissioner of commerce to make a determination of the efficiency of the applicant's electric power generation facility; and (2) shall develop an electronic means to notify interested parties when electric power generation facilities have filed an application. The commissioner of commerce shall calculate efficiency as the ratio of useful energy outputs to energy inputs, expressed as a percentage, based on the performance of the facility's equipment during normal full load operation. The commissioner must include in this formula the energy used in any on-site preparation of materials necessary to convert the materials into the fuel used to generate electricity, such as a process to gasify petroleum coke. The commissioner shall use the Higher Heating Value (HHV) for all substances in the commissioner's efficiency calculations, except for wood for fuel in a biomass -eligible project under section 216B.2424; for these instances, the commissioner shall adjust the heating value to allow for energy consraned for evaporation of the moisture in the wood. The applicant shall provide the commissioner of commerce with whatever information the commissioner deems necessary to make the determination. Within 30 days of the receipt of the necessary information, the commissioner of commerce shall certify the findings of the efficiency determination to the commissioner of revenue and to the applicant. The commissioner of commerce shall determine the efficiency of the facility and certify the findings of that determination to the commissioner of revenue every two years thereafter from the date of the original certification. Subd. 2. Sliding scale exclusion. Based upon the efficiency determination provided by the commissioner of commerce as described in subdivision 1, the commissioner of revenue shall subtract eight percent of the taxable market value of the qualifying property for each percentage point that the efficiency of the specific facility, as determined by the commissioner of commerce, is above 40 percent. The reduction in taxable market value shall be reflected in the taxable market value of the facility beginning with the assessment year immediately following the determination. The commissioner shall develop an electronic means to notify interested parties of the qualifying facilities and their respective exclusion percentages after the efficiency determination is made by the Department of Commerce. For a facility that is assessed by the county in which the facility is 6R APPENDIX Repealed Minnesota Statutes: 17-3337 located, the commissioner of revenue shall certify to the assessor of that county the percentage of the taxable minket value of the facility to be excluded. Subd. 3. Revocation. (a) The commissioner of revenue shall revoke the market value reduction under this section, if: (1) the applicant exercises its right under federal law to require an electric utility to purchase power generated by the facility; and (2) the electric utility notifies the commissioner that the applicant has exercised its right to require purchase of power. The revocation is effective beginning the first assessment year after notification of the commissioner. (b) For purposes of this subdivision, the following terms mean: (1) "Federal law" is the federal Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act, United States Code, title 16, section 824a-3, and regulations promulgated under that section, including Code of Federal Regulations, title 18, sections 929.303 and 929.304. (2) "Electric utility" means an electric utility as defined in federal law described in clause (1). Subd. 4. Eligibility. An owner or operator of a new or existing electric power generation facility who offers electric power generated by the facility for sale is eligible for an exclusion under this section only if: (1) the owner or operator has received a certificate of need under section 216B.243, if required under that section; (2) the public utilities commission finds that an agreement exists or a good faith offer has been made to sell the majority of the net power generated by the facility to an electric utility which has a demonstrated need for the power. A right of first refusal satisfies the good faith offer requirement. The commission shall have 90 days from the date the commission receives notice of the application under subdivision 1 to make this determination; (3) the electric utility has agreed in advance not to offer the electric power for resale to a retail customer located outside of the utility's assigned service area, or, if the utility is a generation and transmission cooperative electric association, the assigned service area of its members, unless otherwise permitted by law; and (4) for any facility that was not certified as eligible for an exclusion under subdivision 2 for property taxes payable in 2015, the facility must be converted from coal to an alternative fuel and must have a nameplate capacity prior to conversion of less than 75 megawatts. For the purposes of this subdivision, "electric utility" means an entity whose primary business function is to operate, maintain, or control equipment or facilities for providing electric service at retail or wholesale, and includes distribution cooperative electric associations, generation and transmission cooperative electric associations, municipal utilities, and public utilities as defined in section 216B.02, subdivision 4. 7R BEFORE THE MINNESOTA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION Beverly Jones Heydinger Nancy Lange Dan Lipschultz Matthew Schuerger John A. Tuma In the Matter of Xcel Energy's 2016-2030 Integrated Resource Plan Chair Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner ISSUE DATE: January 11, 2017 DOCKETNO. E-002/RP-15-21 ORDER APPROVING PLAN WITH MODIFICATIONS AND ESTABLISHING REQUIREMENTS FOR FUTURE RESOURCE PLAN FILINGS PROCEDURAL HISTORY On January 2, 2015, Northern States Power Company d/b/a Xcel Energy (Xcel) filed a resource plan under Minn. Stat. § 21613.2422 and Minn. R. 7843.0400, covering the period 2016-2030. On January 16, 2015, the Commission issued a Notice of Comment Period and Procedures on Resource Plan, requiring Xcel to submit a revised preferred plan that incorporated resource decisions made in Docket E-002/CN-12-1240.1 The Commission also established a public comment and reply -comment period for the resource plan. On October 2, 2015, in response to stakeholder comment filings and information requests, Xcel filed reply comments proposing significant changes to its resource plan. On January 6, 2016, the Commission issued an order requiring Xcel to supplement its resource plan no later than January 29, 2016, by filing updated plans and related additional analysis.2 The order provided that the Commission would establish a procedural schedule after the Minnesota Department of Commerce (the Department) had an opportunity to initially review the filing and make procedural recommendations. In Docket E-002/CN-12-1240 the Commission approved certain power purchase agreements to meet identified resource needs arising before 2019. In the Matter of the Petition of Northern States Power Conipanv d/b/a Xcel Energy for Approval of Competitive Resource Acquisition Proposal and Certificate of Need, Order Approving Power Purchase Agreement with Calpine, Approving Power Purchase Agreement with Geronimo, and Approving Price Terms With Xcel (February 5, 2015). 2 Order Requiring Supplemental Filing (January 6, 2016) On January 29, 2016, Xcel filed a supplement describing its "Current Preferred Plan." The supplemented resource plan proposed: • Ceasing coal operations at Sherburne County Generating Station (Shereo) Units 1 and 2 in the 2020s; • Adding 1,400 megawatts of large-scale solar (400 megawatts by 2020); • Adding 1,800 megawatts of wind (800 megawatts by 2020); • Adding natural gas generation in the 2020s, including a combustion turbine generator in North Dakota, and a combined cycle generator on the Sherco site by 2026. On February 29, 2016, after conducting discovery and holding discussions with the Company, the Department filed its review of the plan and made procedural recommendations. On March 3, 2016, the Commission requested comments on whether Xcel's Current Preferred Plan is in the public interest. By July 8, 2016, the Commission received comments from: • Becker City Council • Fresh Energy, Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy, Sierra Club, and Wind on the Wires (the Clean Energy Organizations) • EDF Renewable Energy • Enc] Green Power North America, Inc. • Hennepin County • Institute for Local Self -Reliance • hivenergy LLC • Minnesota Department of Commerce (the Department) • Minnesota Pollution Control Agency • Minnesota State Representative Jim Newberger • NextEra Energy Resources, LLC • Prairie Island Indian Community • St. Paul Cogeneration, LLC • Sherburne County Administration • Flint Hills Resources, LP; Gerdau Ameristeel US Inc.; Unimin Corporation; and USG Interiors LLC (the Xcel Large Industrials) By August 12, 2016, the Commission received reply comments from: • City of Red Wing • Center for Energy and Environment • City of Minneapolis • the Clean Energy Organizations • Health Professionals for a Healthy Climate • the Saint Paul Area Chamber of Commerce • Sierra Club -organized individuals and organizations • Xcel Energy • Xcel Large Industrials • 3 individuals via SpeakUp On September 13, 2016, the Department submitted supplemental comments. The Department recommended approval of Xcel's revised resource plan, with further modifications and additional filing requirements. On October 6 and 13, 2016, the Commission met to consider the matter. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS I. Summary of Commission Action In this order, the Commission will approve a modified version of Xcel's supplemented resource plan and set requirements for future resource plan filings. The Commission will: • approve the acquisition of at least 1000 MW of wind generation by 2019 and at least 650 MW of solar generation by 2021; • approve the retirement of Sherco 2 in 2023, and Sherco 1 in 2026; • determine that there will likely be a need for approximately 750 MW of intermediate capacity coinciding with the retirement of Sherco 1 in 2026. The Commission will also approve resource acquisition processes to meet anticipated generation needs in a manner consistent with the public interest. Il. Legal Background A public utility providing electricity to at least 10,000 customers and capable of generating 100 megawatts (MW) of electricity must file a resource plan or report for the Commission's approval, rejection, or modification. A resource plan or report generally details the projected need for electricity in its service territory for a forecasted planning period, and the utility's plans for meeting projected need, including the actions it will take in the next five years.3 Resource plans are evaluated on their ability to: A. maintain or improve the adequacy and reliability of utility service; B. keep the customers' bills and the utility's rates as low as practicable, given regulatory and other constraints; 3 Minn. Stat. § 21613.2422; Minn. R. Chap. 7843. C. minimize adverse socioeconomic effects and adverse effects upon the environment; D. enhance the utility's ability to respond to changes in the financial, social, and technological factors affecting its operations; and E. limit the risk of adverse effects on the utility and its customers from financial, social, and technological factors that the utility cannot control .4 To reliably provide the electricity demanded by its customers, an electric utility considers both supply and demand. The utility can supply electricity through a combination of generation and power purchases, and by reducing the amount of electricity lost through transmission and distribution. The utility can manage customer demand by encouraging customers to conserve electricity or to shift activities requiring electricity to periods when there is less demand on the electric system. A resource plan contains a set of demand- and supply-side resource options that the utility could use to meet the forecasted needs of retail customers.' By integrating the evaluation of supply- and demand-side resource options—treating each resource as a potential substitute for the others—a utility can find the least -cost plan that is consistent with legal requirements and policies. Although the Commission must approve, reject, or modify the resource plans of investor-owned utilities, the resource -planning process is largely collaborative and iterative. The process is collaborative because there are a wide array of facts and considerations that may be relevant to resource choices or deployment timetables. The facts on which resource decisions depend—how quickly an area and its need for electricity will grow, how much electricity will cost over the lifetime of a generating facility or a purchased -power contract, how much conservation potential the service area holds and at what cost—all require the kind of careful judgment that sharpens with exposure to the views of engaged and knowledgeable stakeholders. The process is iterative because analyzing future energy needs and preparing to meet them is not a static process; strategies for meeting future needs are always evolving in response to changes in actual conditions in the service area. When demographics, economics, technologies, or environmental regulations change, so do a utility's resource needs and its strategies for meeting them. M. Xcel's Resource Plan Xcel projects that, under median forecast conditions, it will have sufficient generation capacity until the mid -2020s, but that three main factors will lead to a need for additional generating capacity in or around 2025. The Company expects the need for new generating capacity to be driven primarily by: (1) Xcel's proposal to retire Sherco units 1 and 2 (1,400 MW of generating capacity), (2) the retirement of roughly 850 MW of aging, Xcel-owned peaking plants, and (3) the expiration of power purchase agreements (PPAs) for more than 2,000 MW. The exact timing 4 Minn. R. 7843.0500, subp. 3. ' Minn. Stat § 21613.2422, subd. 1(d) 13 and amount of the anticipated need depends on the timing of plant retirements as well as the adoption of community solar gardens (CSGs) and other factors. Xcel used an industry -standard modeling tool called Strategist to analyze its projected resource needs and propose its preferred plan for meeting the need. Based on its analysis, Xcel proposed to acquire 1,400 MW of large-scale solar, 1,800 MW of wind, and 2,856 MW of natural gas generation over the planning period. To address a portion of the identified need, the Company specified that it preferred to use the Sherco site for an approximately 800 MW combined cycle natural gas plant. The Company acknowledged that its proposal goes beyond the Commission's historical approach to resource planning by specifying a location for a proposed plant. Xcel asserted that determining the proposed plant's size, type, timing, and location in this proceeding would be appropriate because the location is supported by reliability and socioeconomic factors and because a location determination now would provide certainty to employees and the community, which would likely be affected by retirement of Sherco units 1 and 2. The Department replicated Xcel's modeling in Strategist, reviewed the Company's base assumptions, and ran additional scenarios under a variety of contingencies (or sensitivities). Based on its analysis and modeling, the Department made its own planning recommendations. Overall, the Department largely agreed with Xcel's planned resource additions and retirements, and recommended approval of the plan with modifications. Concerns about Xcel's plan raised by the Department and other commenters fell into three broad categories: forecasts, modeling, and assumptions underlying the plan; details of proposed five- year and intermediate-term resource decisions; and information needed to evaluate future resource plans. These issues are addressed, with plan modifications and filing requirements where appropriate, in the sections below. IV. Forecasting Xcel forecasted energy requirements and peak demands from 2016 through 2030 using monthly data from 1998 to 2014. The Department raised concerns about the analyses Xcel used to reach its forecasting conclusions. A. Positions of the Parties The Department recommended approval of Xcel's base energy forecast and peals demand forecast for planning purposes only. In particular, the Department argued that the forecast results were subject to some uncertainty and, in light of the uncertainty, the use of the forecasts should be limited. At the Commission meeting, Xcel agreed with the Department that its energy and peak demand forecasts should only be used for planning purposes. B. Commission Action The Commission agrees that Xcel's Strategist -modeled energy and demand forecast is acceptable for planning purposes but concludes it should not be used to support any resource acquisition proposal beyond the five-year action plan. Disagreement over Xcel's methodology for forecasting the long-term peak -demand growth rate and the long -run effects of Demand Side Management raise doubts about the forecasts' usefulness beyond the five-year action plan. The Commission is persuaded that the use of these forecasts should be limited as the Department has proposed. Resource acquisitions beyond the five-year plan should be subject to a more contemporaneous demonstration of need. The Commission will so order. V. Five -Year Action Plan Based on its forecasts, Xcel initially proposed adding 400 megawatts of large-scale solar by 2020, and 800 megawatts of wind. While generally supportive of Xcel's proposed resource additions, the Department recommended slightly different quantities and timing. Other commenting parties were also generally supportive of Xcel's proposals for wind and solar acquisitions through 2021. The process or processes by which Xcel would pursue approved wind and solar resource acquisitions was subject to more disagreement. The process for acquiring generation resources can have a significant effect on the type, cost, and ownership structure of proposals submitted for consideration and ultimately chosen for acquisition. Xcel's proposal included 50% Company- owned wind resources. A. Positions of the Parties Xcel proposed to use what it characterized as a modified Track 1 Request for Proposals (RFP) process to both acquire wind projects and demonstrate the competitiveness of its self -build proposal. Xcel's proposal contained features of both track I and track 2 acquisition processes—it contemplates both competitive bidding and a competing Company-owned resource proposal. The Company proposed the following process: 1) Xcel issues an RFP for wind resources .7 6 The Commission has approved a two -track resource acquisition processwhichamong other things provides that a competitive bidding process governs when Xcel does not submit a proposal in a competitive resource procurement process (Track 1), and that a Certificate -of -Need -like process governs procurement when Xcel does submit a proposal (Track 2). In the Matter of Northern States Power Company db/aXcel Energy's Application for Approval of its 2004 Resource Plan, Docket No. E-002/RP-04-1752, Order Establishing Resource Acquisition Process, Establishing Bidding Process Under Minn. Stat. § 216B.2422, Subd. 5, and Requiring Compliance Filing (May 31, 2006). More detail on the lengthy history of the two -track bidding process can be found in the Department's Comments, pp. 44-50. (July 8, 2016). 7 Xcel issued an RFP for wind resources on September 22, 2016, with a bid deadline of October 25, 2016. The Company states that it anticipates seeking Commission approval for agreements arising from the RFP in early 2017. Xcel Letter, this docket (September 22, 2016). 2) The day prior to receiving wind bids, Xcel will submit its own self -build proposal including estimates of final costs. 3) Xcel will evaluate the bids and select projects for negotiations based on a list of factors (factors which Xcel outlined in its reply comments). 4) Xcel will file with the Commission the results of the bidding process, project rankings, its analysis, and the results of a third party auditor's report of its bidding and review process. Additionally, Xcel will evaluate the criteria outlined in the Minn. Stat. § 21613.243, subd. 9 certificate of need exemption for renewable energy standard (RES) facilities. Xcel argued that this modified or hybrid acquisition process was appropriate to ensure the timely and cost-effective acquisition of wind resources and to reduce the burden on wind developers. The Company also argued that Commission approval of the proposed process would exempt the chosen projects from a certificate of need requirement under Minn. Stat. § 21613.2422, subd. 5. The Department, on the basis of its independent modeling and analysis, recommended that the Commission modify Xcel's action plan to acquire about 1,000 MW of wind by 2019 (instead of 800 MW in 2018) and to remove the large-scale solar from the action plan to allow for greater certainty from the CSG program. The Department also recommended that the Commission approve Xcel's proposed, modified acquisition process,8 with the proper mix of purchased power and Company-owned resources determined by the facts established during the acquisition process regarding alternatives. The Clean Energy Organizations advocated for a transparent acquisition process that would accommodate a variety of ownership structures and for regulatory oversight to protect ratepayer and public interests. The Institute for Local Self -Reliance objected to the Company's proposal to commit to Xcel's contemplated 50% Company ownership of proposed wind resources. B. Commission Action Despite slight variation in the exact timing and magnitude, the record clearly showed that acquisition of wind and possibly solar resources in the next five years represents the least -cost method of meeting Xcel's near-term resource needs. The Commission finds that the record shows that it is reasonable to acquire at least 1000 MW of wind by 2019. This acquisition is least -cost even though Xcel does not show a planning capacity deficit until the mid 2020s because it will provide incrementally lower-cost energy, thereby reducing system costs. Upon submission of evidence such as price, bidder qualifications, rate impact, transmission availability and location, additional acquisitions may be approved. The Commission will modify Xcel's plan to acquire 400 MW of large-scale solar in 2016-2021. Instead, Xcel will be required to acquire approximately 650 MW of solar in this timeframe through a combination of the Company's community solar gardens program or other acquisitions (without limitation to "large-scale" solar). The Company may pursue additional, cost-effective 8 Though initially the Department's recommendation was limited to approving a process for proposed wind acquisitions, at the Commission meeting the Department elaborated on its recommendation, agreeing with a proposal that the Commission "authorize use of the modified Track 2 bidding process and authorize the process as a Commission -authorized bidding process [under Minn. Stat. § 21613.2422, subd. 5(c)]" without expressing a requirement that the process be limited to wind acquisitions. solar resources if it is in the best interests of its customers. Xcel shall report on its progress in its next resource plan. Minn. Stat. § 216B.2422, subd. 5(a), provides that a utility may select resources to meet its projected energy demand through a bidding process approved or established by the Commission. The Commission established the existing two -track bidding process for Xcel just over a decade ago. Having reviewed the Company's proposed, modified acquisition process, the Commission agrees that it is a reasonable method of acquiring wind and solar resources in the 2016-2021 timeframe. The Commission will therefore approve the bidding process described by Xcel for the limited purpose of acquiring wind and solar resources in the 2016-2021 timeframe. The Commission declines to approve the proposed acquisition process without limitation because the two -track process has provided needed certainty and transparency for participants and regulators. But in this case, given the scope and nature of the needed acquisitions, and the need for prompt action, the Commission agrees that the proposed modified process is reasonable and appropriate. VI. Intermediate Term—Sherco Units 1 and 2 Xcel proposes to retire Sherco Units 1 and 2 before 2030. The two generating units produce approximately 1,400 MW of capacity and associated energy. Together with its proposal to retire the two units, Xcel proposes to construct a 780 MW combined -cycle generating unit on the Sherco site. A. Positions of the Parties There was no material disagreement among stakeholders over the proposed retirement of Sherco Units 1 and 2. Retirement of these units is supported by the Company's and Department's modeling showing that retirement is part of virtually every least -cost planning scenario, with some room to argue over the precise year in which to retire each unit. While the need for some additional resources between 2025 and 2030 was relatively uncontroversial, details of Xcel's proposal drew some criticism, particularly the proposal to identify a specific generator fuel -type and location to meet the identified need. The Company asserted that socio-economic and technical factors justified identifying a fuel type and location as part of this proceeding. Apart from the Sherco location's general suitability for new generating facilities because a generating facility is already sited there, Xcel argued that committing to the location would clearly mitigate the negative impact of the plant retirements for that community. It also argued that from a business planning perspective having those details decided well in advance would facilitate the Company's efforts to smoothly transition employees in the retiring plants. Finally, it contended that engineering studies showed that a combined cycle generator on the Sherco site would be uniquely well-suited to address grid reliability concerns that would need to be addressed in the same time frame. Xcel's proposal received support from the City of Becker and Sherburne County Administration, and State Representative Jim Newberger. These commenters identified that retirement of the Sherco coal-fired plants would be detrimental to the local economy, and that building replacement generation on the site would mitigate the negative impact. The Department, the Clean Energy Organizations, and the Xcel Large industrials objected to a decision that would commit to specifics such as the exact location, fuel type, and generation capacity. They argued that the need for a decision on those details was not immediate, and would be better left for future consideration—which would allow more flexibility to consider alternatives in the meantime. B. Commission Action Historically, the Commission has used resource planning as a tool to assess and determine the appropriate size, type, and timing of generation resources. At issue is the level of planning detail the Commission should commit to as part of approving this resource plan. At the Commission meeting, it became clear that the distance between the stakeholders' positions is small but nuanced. Xcel wishes for the Commission to approve an approximately 780 MW combined cycle facility at a particular location. The Department recommended that the Commission find a need for approximately 750 MW of "intermediate capacity.i' And the Clean Energy Organizations recommended that the Commission find a need for approximately 750 MW of capacity. The Commission is persuaded by the argument that, given the Sherco retirement dates of 2023 and 2026, it is premature at this time to determine with specificity the fuel type and location to address the identified 750 MW capacity need. The Commission is not persuaded that alternatives to the reliability concerns raised by Xcel have been fully considered, and believes there is adequate time to explore other resource options and consider the relevant socioeconomic factors without jeopardizing the feasibility of Xcel's preferred plan to build a combined cycle unit on the Sherco site. Therefore, the Commission concludes that, more likely than not, there will be a need for approximately 750 MW of intermediate capacity coinciding with the retirement of Sherco I in 2026. The Commission will authorize a certificate of need process to evaluate options for addressing this anticipated need. The process will allow consideration of resources or resource combination alternatives that meet the identified resource and reliability need without prejudging or foreclosing Xcel's preferred plan. Potential need -addressing alternatives between 2025 and 2030 could include renewal of some expiring PPAs, additional demand response, or some other new generation. The certificate of need process will also be based on a more precise and contemporaneous forecast. Under Minn. Stat. § 21613.243, the Commission must consider the accuracy of the long- range energy demand forecasts offered to justify a certificate of need. As stated above, the forecasts in this resource plan may not be used to support acquisitions beyond Xcel's five-year action plan. At the Commission meeting, Xcel agreed that a certificate of need filing would incorporate an updated energy and demand forecast for Commission evaluation. 9 The Department defined "intermediate" capacity facilities as having an overall capacity factor of 20- 40%, as distinct from "baseload" (higher capacity factor), and "peaking" (a lower capacity factor). Capacity factor reflects the ratio of a facility's actual output over time relative to its nameplate capacity. VII. Intermediate Term—Other Resources The Commission will also require Xcel to evaluate and pursue other resource options between 2023 and 2030. In fight of rapidly changing costs among potential energy and capacity sources, Xcel must maintain flexibility and consider a broad range of resource options. In addition to requiring evaluation of combinations of supply-side, demand-side, and transmission alternatives to address its 750 MW need identified above, Xcel's plan must include the acquisition of no less than 400 MW of additional demand response by 2023. This level of potential demand response capacity is supported by even the most conservative study of Xcel's system in the record. For reasons similar to those stated above regarding the contemplated Sherco replacement, Xcel's planned additions of combustion turbine generation in 2025-2030 will also be modified to be less specific. Rather than approve a plan with a specific generation type or location for those resource additions, the Commission concludes that a plan that does not specify location or generation type in that time frame will be more consistent with the public and ratepayer interests. VIII. Requirements for Future Resource Plans Finally, the Commission will direct that Xcel investigate, evaluate, and discuss an array of resource and planning issues that arose during the course of this proceeding. Major plant retirements are coming over Xcel's planning horizon in upcoming resource planning cycles, and it is important that Xcel, the Commission, and stakeholders regard system needs holistically. As this proceeding demonstrated, individual plant retirements can give rise to complex locational and system concerns that, without sufficiently forward-looking planning, may constrain future decisions. Considering the future of Xcel's system as a whole as its generation fleet ages will help maximize planning flexibility. t'1 1. Xcel Energy's 2016-2030 Resource Plan is approved with the modifications required by this order. 2. Xcel's Strategist -modeled energy and demand forecast is acceptable for planning purposes but may not be used to support any resource acquisition proposal beyond the five-year action plan. 3. It is reasonable to acquire at least 1000 MW of wind by 2019. Acquisition of greater than 1000 MW may be approved upon submission of evidence such as price, bidder qualifications, rate impact, transmission availability, and location. 4. Xcel's resource plan is modified as follows: a, to remove 400 MW of large-scale solar in 2016-2021. Xcel shall acquire approximately 650 MW of solar in 2016 2021 through a combination of the Company's community solar gardens program or other acquisitions. The Company may pursue additional, cost-effective solar resources if it is in the best interests of its customers. b. to change Xcel's proposed Fargo combustion turbine to a generic combustion turbine. 10 c. to change Xcel's planned CT additions in the 2025-2030 time frame to provide instead for adding the most cost-effective combination of resources consistent with state energy policies, including but not limited to the following resource options: large hydropower, short-term life extensions of Xcel-owned peaking units, natural gas combustion turbines, demand response, utility -scale solar generation, energy storage, and combined heat and power. Concerning wind and solar resource acquisitions, Xcel: a. may use the modified Track 2 process for the acquisition of wind resources included in the five-year action plan, and for any additional solar, if needed, through 2021; b. shall, if Xcel intends to provide a bid for wind generation, acquire wind resources through the modified Track 2 process. c. shall file a contingency plan early in the process (preferably with the filing of the Company's self -build proposal) to address the potential for the bidding process to fail; and d. shall, in wind acquisition proceedings, describe how revenues from wind generation sold into the MISO market will be returned to Minnesota ratepayers, and provide an estimate of these revenues. The proper mix of purchased power and Company-owned resources shall be determined during the resource acquisition process. 6. In any filing seeking approval of wind resources, Xcel shall discuss each project's wind curtailment risk. 7. Xcel's schedule to retire Sherco 2 in 2023, and Sherco 1 in 2026, is approved. 8. The Commission finds that more likely than not there will be a need for approximately 750 MW of intermediate capacity coinciding with the retirement of Sherco 1 in 2026. 9. Xcel is authorized to file a petition for a certificate of need under Minn. Stat. § 21613.243 to select the resource or resource combination that best meets the system resource and reliability needs associated with the retirement of Sherco 1 in 2026. The Company's filing and the proceeding shall: • evaluate combinations of supply-side, demand-side, and transmission alternatives; • consider location -specific factors related to socioeconomic impacts on the local community and regional reliability; • allow for utility ownership of replacement resources if determined to be in the best interest of customers; • comply with all relevant state energy policies; and • ensure public participation. 10. Xcel shall acquire no less than 400 MW of additional demand response by 2023. 11. An average annual energy savings level of 444 GWh for all planning years is approved. 11 12. Xcel shall investigate the potential for an energy -efficiency competitive bidding process for customers that have opted out of the statewide Conservation Improvement Program (CIP) under Minn. Stat. § 216B.241, subd. Ia(b). 13. Xcel shall file its next resource plan on February 1, 2019, 14. In its next resource plan filing, Xcel shall: a. describe its plans and possible scenarios for cost-effective and orderly retirement of its aging baseload fleet, including Sherco, King, Monticello, and Prairie Island. b. evaluate combinations of supply-side (distributed and centralized), demand-side, and transmission solutions that could in the aggregate meet post-retirement energy and capacity needs as well as contribute to grid support. c. explore the role of cost-effective combined heat and power solutions. d. report on its solar acquisition progress. e. provide a full and thorough cost-effectiveness study that takes into account the technical and economic achievability of 1,000 MW of additional demand response, or approximately 20% of Xcel's system peak in total by 2025. f. summarize its investigation and findings concerning the potential for an energy - efficiency competitive bidding process for customers that have opted out of CEP. 15. In future resource plan filings, analysis and inputs must, to the extent possible, be consistent with Xcel's distribution system planning. 16. This order shall become effective immediately. BY ORDER OF THE COMMISSION Daniel P. Wolf Executive Secretary This document can be made available in alternative formats (e.g., large print or audio) by calling 651.296.0406 (voice). Persons with hearing loss or speech disabilities may call us through their preferred Telecommunications Relay Service. 12 BEFORE THE MINNESOTA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION Beverly Jones Heydinger Nancy Lange Dan Lipschultz Matthew Schuerger John A. Tuma In the Matter of Minnesota Power's 2016-2030 Integrated Resource Plan Chair Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner ISSUE DATE: July 18, 2016 DOCKET NO. E-015/RP-15-690 ORDER APPROVING RESOURCE PLAN WITH MODIFICATIONS PROCEDURAL HISTORY On September 1, 2015, Minnesota Power filed its 2015 Integrated Resource Plan under Minnesota Statutes section 21613.2422 and Minnesota Rules chapter 7843. The Company supplemented the plan on November 4. On January 4, 2016, the following parties filed comments on Minnesota Power's resource plan: • Minnesota Department of Commerce (the Department) • Clean Energy Organizations) • Large Power IntervenorS2 The Department recommended that the Commission approve the plan with modifications. The Clean Energy Organizations criticized aspects of the Company's forecast and modeling and recommended several modifications to its plan. The Large Power Intervenors largely supported the plan but requested that the Company provide further information on the plan's rate impacts. On March 4, the following parties filed reply comments: • The Department • Clean Energy Organizations • Large Power Intervenors I The following organizations filed jointly as the Clean Energy Organizations: Fresh Energy, Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy, Sierra Club, and Wind on the Wires. 2 The following companies filed jointly as the Large Power Intervenors: ArcelorMittal USA (Minorca Mine); Blandin Paper Company; Boise Paper, a Packaging Corporation of America company; Enbridge Energy, LP; Hibbing Taconite Company; Mesabi Nugget Delaware, LLC; PolyMet Mining, Inc.; Sappi Cloquet, LLC; USG Interiors, LLC; United States Steel Corporation (Keewatin Taconite and Miname Mine); United Taconite, LLC; and Verso Corporation. • Minnesota Power The Commission also received comments from some 1,700 members of the public.. Most of these commenters voiced support for a resource plan that would hasten Minnesota Power's transition away from coal-fired generation and toward renewable resources and energy efficiency. A large number of commenters specifically supported maximizing community solar generation and ensuring that all ratepayers have the opportunity to participate in community solar. On June 9, 2016, the Commission met to consider the matter. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS I. Background A. The Resource -Planning Process The resource -planning statute and rules are detailed, but basically they require a utility to file biennial reports on (1) the projected energy needs of its service area over the next 15 years; (2) its plans for meeting projected need; (3) the analytical process it used to develop its plans for meeting projected need; and (4) its reasons for adopting the specific resource mix proposed to meet projected need .3 These requirements are designed to strengthen utilities' long-term planning processes by providing input from the public, other regulatory agencies, and the Commission. They are also designed to ensure that utilities give adequate consideration to factors whose public policy importance has grown in recent years, such as the environmental and socioeconomic impact of different resource mixes. For example, the statute requires utilities to develop plans for meeting 50% and 75% of new and refurbished capacity needs with conservation and renewable energy.4 It also requires them to factor into resource decisions the environmental costs, or externalities, of different generation technologies.5 Although the Commission must approve, reject, or modify the resource plans of investor-owned utilities, the resource -planning process is largely collaborative and iterative. The process is collaborative because there are few hard facts dictating resource choices or deployment timetables. The facts on which resource decisions depend—how quickly an area and its need for electricity will grow, how much electricity will cost over the lifetime of a generating facility or a purchased -power contract, how much conservation potential the service area holds and at what cost—all require the kind of careful judgment that sharpens with exposure to the views of engaged and knowledgeable stakeholders. The process is iterative because analyzing future energy needs and preparing to meet them is not a static process; strategies for meeting future needs are always evolving in response to changes in 3 See Minn. Stat. § 21613.2422; Minn. R. ch. 7843. 4 Minn. Stat. § 216B.2422, subd. 2. 5 Id., subd. 3. 2 actual conditions in the service area. When demographics, economics, technologies, or environmental regulations change, so do a utility's resource needs and its strategies for meeting them. B. Minnesota Power's Electric System Minnesota Power, a division of ALLETE, Inc., serves about 144,000 retail electric customers and 16 municipal systems across a 26,000 -square -mile service area in central and northeastern Minnesota. In 2014, 54 percent of the Company's sales went to large power customers, primarily in the taconite mining, iron concentrate, paper, pulp, refining, and pipeline industries. Many of these industrial customers operate 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, contributing to the Company's 80 -percent system load factor. Minnesota Power procures most of its electricity from coal-fired generators, although it is working to rebalance its generation mix to be one-third coal, one-third natural gas, and one-third renewables. The Company repowered its coal-fired Laskin Energy Center plant to run on natural gas in early 2015. in June 2015, the Company also shut down a coal-fired generator (Unit 3) at its Taconite Harbor Energy Center. In the current resource plan, it proposes to idle the two remaining units at Taconite Harbor (Units 1 and 2) by 2017, beginning their transition away from coal-fired generation. Over the past decade, Minnesota Power has constructed or contracted to purchase more than 600 megawatts (MW) of wind generation. It has signed long-term agreements with Manitoba Hydro to purchase 383 MW of hydroelectricity beginning in 2020. And it has begun adding solar power to its generation fleet with a 10 MW project at the Camp Ripley National Guard base near Little Falls and a proposed community -solar pilot program. C. Minnesota Power's Resource Plan Minnesota Power anticipates minimal power -supply needs in the near term but projects a capacity deficit starting in the mid 2020s. Below are the basic outlines of the Company's preferred plan for addressing this deficit while continuing to rebalance its generation mix: • Idle Taconite Harbor Units 1 and 2, using them for reliability when market conditions are favorable, and cease coal operations at Taconite Harbor by 2020; • Reduce the sulfur -dioxide (SO,) emissions of Boswell Energy Center Units 1 and 2 by routing their exhaust through Unit 3's pollution -control equipment; • Use bilateral contracts to supply capacity needs between 2016 and 2019; • Prepare its transmission system for the addition of the Manitoba Hydro purchased power in 2020:and e Begin a competitive procurement process for 200 -300 MW of natural gas combined -cycle generation for implementation by 2024. M. Load Forecast A utility's forecast of anticipated load is the foundation of a resource plan, informing decisions about the timing and magnitude of energy and capacity additions. In this resource plan, Minnesota Power used its 2014 Annual Electric Utility Forecast Report, which was the latest load outlook available in early 2015 when the Company began its resource -planning analysis. The Company completed its 2015 forecast in mid -2015. In general, the 2015 forecast predicts lower load growth than the 2014 forecast. At hearing, Minnesota Power stated that it expected its forthcoming 2016 forecast to show a similar low -growth trend. The Clean Energy Organizations argued that there were several flaws in the Company's load forecast, causing it to overestimate future demand. In particular, they argued that the forecast overstates industrial demand based on overly optimistic assumptions about when or whether several major proposed projects, including Polymet's copper -nickel mine, Enbridge's Sandpiper oil pipeline, and Essar Steel's taconite plant, would come to fruition. The Department disagreed with most of the Clean Energy Organizations' criticisms of Minnesota Power's forecast. It saw less significance in an overstated load forecast, arguing that lower demand would support adding less renewable generation but would not affect the timing of coal -plant retirements. And it maintained that the Company had evaluated a reasonable range of forecasts in developing its resource plan. The Commission concurs with the Department that Minnesota Power's range of load forecasting used for its 2015 resource plan is reasonable for planning purposes. However, the Clean Energy Organizations' comments serve to highlight the economic trends that have led to lower demand projections in recent forecasts. In light of these trends, Minnesota Power's load forecast scenarios used in its 2015 resource plan may overstate the size or timing of future needs. The Commission bears this fact in mind as it evaluates the Company's preferred plan in the following sections. IV. Taconite Harbor Energy Center Units 1 and 2 A. Introduction Minnesota Power's Taconite Harbor Energy Center currently has two operating coal-fired units with a combined capacity of 150 MW. In its last resource -plan order, the Commission directed the Company to analyze the effects of retiring Taconite Harbor Units 1 and 2 or of repowering them to run on different fuel.6 Minnesota Power's analysis found that shutting the plant down would create transmission - reliability concerns, requiring upgrades to ensure that electric service is maintained. One set of local transmission upgrades, costing approximately $8 million, would be required at the time of shutdown. A second set, costing approximately $30 million, would be required later if predicted 6 In the Matter ofMinnesota Power's 2013-2027 Integrated Resource Plan, Docket No. E-015/ RP -13-53, Order Approving Resource Plan, Requiring Filings, and Setting Date for Next Resource Plan, at 8 (November 12, 2013) (hereafter "2013 Resource Plan Order"). load growth in the area materializes. Minnesota Power compared three alternative timing options for ceasing coal operations at Taconite Harbor—shut down by 2026, shut down by 2019, and idle by 2017. The Company's analysis found the idle -by -2017 option to be the most cost-effective. Under this scenario, Minnesota Power would idle Units 1 and 2 and purchase lower-cost replacement energy on the wholesale market, while the units would remain available to restart if needed for system reliability. Minnesota Power identified 2020 as the optimal time to either retire or repower the units, coinciding with the expected availability of purchased power from Manitoba Hydro. B. Positions of the Parties The Department recommended that Minnesota Power shut down Taconite Harbor Units 1 and 2 in 2017. The Department modeled several shutdown scenarios and found retiring the units early to be more cost-effective than shutting them down at a later date. The Clean Energy Organizations recommended that Taconite Harbor Units 1 and 2 be immediately retired. They argued that the units are not economic to operate, and that there is significant risk that continued operation of Taconite Harbor will violate air-quality standards for sulfur dioxide (SO2). And they argued that Minnesota Power's modeling methodology biased the results against shutting down its small coal units, including the Taconite Harbor units, sooner. The Large Power Intervenors supported Minnesota Power's plan to idle Taconite Harbor Units 1 and 2 in the near term, arguing that this course of action would allow the Company flexibility in the face of uncertainty over the timing and details of anticipated carbon -dioxide (CO2) emissions regulations. C. Commission Action The Commission concurs with Minnesota Power and the Large Power Intervenors that idling Taconite Harbor Units 1 and 2 will provide the Company with needed flexibility to call the units back to service for reliability purposes as it transitions away from coal-fired operations. Idling these units will also allow the Company to take advantage of inexpensive replacement energy offered in the wholesale market. The Commission will require Minnesota Power to idle Taconite Harbor Units 1 and 2 in 2016, retaining the ability to restart them to address reliability or emergency needs on the transmission system, and cease coal-fired operation by the end of 2020. The Commission will consider future refueling and re-missioning opportunities for these units in the context of the Company's next resource plan, which will be filed on February 1, 2018. The Commission will also direct Minnesota Power to remedy the local transmission -system issues identified in its analysis of retiring Taconite Harbor Units 1 and 2. These transmission upgrades will pave the way for the eventual retirement or re-missioning of Taconite Harbor; at hearing, the Company acknowledged that it planned to make these local upgrades in any case. Minnesota Power will be allowed to recover the reasonable costs of the upgrades, consistent with the estimate listed on page 16 of Appendix F of its resource plan. Finally, questions remain as to how idling Taconite Harbor Units 1 and 2 will affect their operation. Minnesota Power plans to offer the units into the Midcontinent Independent System Operator's (MISO's) capacity auction each year they are idled. If the units are not selected through this process, the Company still plans to keep a modest fuel supply available onsite so that the units can be restarted to provide reliability or address system emergencies. To monitor costs and operations during idling, the Commission will require Minnesota Power to submit an annual report that includes the following information: • Whether Taconite Harbor Energy Center Units 1 and 2 were selected in MISO's annual capacity auction; • Whether the units will receive capacity accreditation in each MISO planning year; • How often the units were dispatched in the previous planning year; • For the previous and upcoming planning year, how much fuel was and will be delivered to the Taconite Harbor Energy Center site; and • Quantification and demonstration of how and why the economic idling of the units is in ratepayers' interests. V. Boswell Energy Center Units 1 and 2 A. Introduction Boswell Energy Center is Minnesota Power's largest coal-fired power plant, with four generating units and a capacity of just over 1,000 MW. Units 1 and 2 are the smallest units, with a combined capacity of approximately 130 MW. Under the terms of an agreement between Minnesota Power and the United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA), Units 1 and 2 would require additional SO2 emission controls to continue operating on coal past 2019. The Company proposes to take advantage of Unit 3's existing pollution -control equipment by rerouting the exhaust from Units 1 and 2 through the Unit 3 equipment, at an anticipated cost of $30 million. The Company's plan assumes that Units 1 and 2 would cease operation in 2024, the end of their useful lives for accounting purposes. Minnesota Power considered other alternatives to comply with the SO2 limits, including refueling Units 1 and 2 with natural gas or retiring them by 2019. According to Minnesota Power, because the units provide black -start capability for Units 3 and 4, a new system -restoration plan would need to be developed for the region if they are retired. In addition, the Company stated that shutting down the units would trigger a need for transmission upgrades of approximately $10 million. B. Positions of the Parties The Department recommended that Minnesota Power procure replacement generation for Boswell Units 1 and 2, including 200 MW of combined -cycle natural gas generation, and shut down the units once the natural gas generation is online, which the Department believed could happen by 2022. The Department's modeling did not find a substantial cost difference between early and late retirement of these units; the main difference it found was that early shutdown required the Company to rely on substantial short-term baseload capacity for another three years. To avoid the need to rely on short -tern market capacity and energy, the Department recommended that Minnesota Power retire the units coincident with the addition of natural gas capacity. The Clean Energy Organizations agreed with the Department that Boswell Units 1 and 2 should be shut down as soon as replacement capacity is available, although they argued that this could occur sooner than 2022. They also questioned the need for a natural gas resource, arguing that Minnesota Power had failed to make the demonstration required by statute that a renewable energy facility is not in the public interest,7 and asserting that a combination of renewable energy and conservation measures could offset the capacity lost by retiring the units. Finally, the Clean Energy Organizations questioned the prudence of investing $30 million in S02 -control measures, especially since, in their view, continued operation would likely result in additional costs to comply with EPA regulations on coal combustion residuals' and power -plant discharges to surface waters.9 In light of these costs, the Clean Energy Organizations argued that retiring Boswell Units 1 and 2 in the near term would be the most prudent alternative. The Large Power Intervenors supported Minnesota Power's plan to continue operating Boswell Units 1 and 2, maintaining that it would preserve flexibility to make prudent decisions for ratepayers. They argued that the Department and the Clean Energy Organizations had not addressed how retiring the units in the near term would affect the reliability and operation of the Company's system. C. Commission Action The Commission concurs with the Department and the Clean Energy Organizations that the most reasonable course of action on this record is to retire Boswell Units 1 and 2 when sufficient replacement energy and capacity are available, but no later than 2022. The Department's analysis showed that the timing of Boswell Units 1 and 2's retirement had little impact on the overall cost of the Company's resource plan. The Department therefore recommended that the units be retired as soon as capacity and energy are available to replace the electricity provided by the units. The Department believed that replacement generation could be in place by 2022. In light of the Department's analysis, the Commission sees no reason to delay these units' retirement beyond 2022. Units 1 and 2 will require additional pollution controls if they continue to operate using coal between 2019 and 2022. The Commission leaves to Minnesota Power the decision of how to address the emissions limits established in its agreement with the U.S. EPA. However, the Company has not demonstrated at this time that its proposed $30 million investment in SO2 reduction is a reasonable investment to allow the units to run for three years. This is especially 7 See Minn. Stat. § 216B.2422, subd. 4. 9 See 40 C.F.R. pt. 257. 9 See 80 Fed. Reg. 67,838 (Nov. 3, 2015). 7 true in light of the relatively modest cost of the transmission upgrades required to retire the units. In the following sections, the Commission discusses resources that could replace Minnesota Power's retiring coal-fired generators and address forecasted load growth. VI. Natural Gas Additions A. Introduction Minnesota Power proposes to add 200-300 MW of natural gas combined -cycle generation by 2024. The Company has already begun a competitive -bidding process to procure natural gas generation and intends to present the results of this process in its next resource plan. Minnesota Power projects that, with the near-term idling of Taconite Harbor Units 1 and 2, it will need approximately 200 MW of new capacity from 2017-2019. In 2020, the Manitoba Hydro contracts are expected to begin filling much of this need, but the Company again forecasts a need for 200-300 MW of capacity in 2025 after the planned retirement or re-missioning of Boswell Units 1 and 2. The Company's preferred plan relies on bilateral contracts to meet the capacity need before 2020; in the longer term, the Company's modeling found a natural gas resource of 200-300 MW to be a cost-effective addition to meet capacity needs. B. Positions of the Parties The Department recommended that Minnesota Power procure 200 MW of combined -cycle natural gas generation. The Department's modeling suggested that 200 MW of combined -cycle generation, in combination with renewable resources and energy conservation measures, could cost-effectively replace the capacity and energy of the Company's coal -based units. The Clean Energy Organizations questioned the need for 200-300 MW of natural gas capacity by 2024, citing concerns with Minnesota Power's load forecast. They questioned why the Company was already soliciting bids despite the need being nearly eight years in the future. And they argued that solicitations for new capacity should be fuel -neutral rather than fuel -specific, so that consideration is given to renewable resources. The Large Power Intervenors also questioned the need for and timing of Minnesota's request for proposals (RFP) for natural gas generation. And they queried whether the Company had considered potentially less expensive alternatives, such as demand -response measures or customer -owned generation. They recommended that Minnesota Power's RFP be withdrawn and revised to reflect the Company's Commission -approved resource plan and to allow for customer -owned generation. C. Commission Action The Commission agrees with the Clean Energy Organizations and the Large Power Intervenors that Minnesota Power's evaluation of replacement generation should not be limited to one resource. At the same time, the Commission does not wish to foreclose the Company's exploration of efficient combined -cycle generation as part of a portfolio of resources to replace its small coal-fired generators. The Commission will therefore allow Minnesota Power to continue pursuing its RFP to investigate the possible procurement of combined -cycle natural gas generation to meet its energy and capacity needs in the absence of Boswell l and 2 and Taconite Harbor 1 and 2. Acceptance of the RFP establishes no presumption that any or all of the generation identified in that bidding process will ultimately be approved. Moreover, to ensure that a wide variety of replacement options is considered in the next resource plan, the Commission will require that the plan include a full analysis of all alternatives to natural gas, including renewables, energy efficiency, distributed generation, and demand response, for providing the energy and capacity sufficient to meet the Company's needs. VII. Wind Additions A. Introduction Minnesota Power did not recommend adding new wind generation in its 2015 resource plan. The Company stated that its modeling did not show wind additions to be a cost-effective capacity addition unless a significant carbon -emissions penalty was assumed. B. Positions of the Parties The Department's analysis found that procuring 300 MW of wind generation in about 2018 would be a cost-effective resource addition under its recommended small -coal retirement scenario. Longer term, it recommended procuring approximately 100 MW of wind (along with 200 MW of natural gas and 50 MW of solar) to help replace Boswell Units 1 and 2. The Clean Energy Organizations supported the Department's recommendations. They argued that Minnesota Power's modeling disfavored the selection of wind by pricing it too high, failing to assign it any accredited capacity, and placing artificial limits on the number of units that could be selected for each year. In reply comments, Minnesota Power acknowledged that the current favorable tax treatment of wind farms provided an opportunity to procure low-cost wind resources that could serve as an energy -price hedge for ratepayers. The Company suggested that adding 100 MW of new wind in 2018 could prove cost-effective; however, it argued that adding 300 MW of wind in that timeframe would likely create an energy surplus in the near term. C. Commission Action The Commission concurs with the parties that procuring additional wind generation in the near term, while it would not provide significant capacity, would benefit Minnesota Power's system by supplying low-cost energy at a fixed price. The parties, however, disagree on how much wind to procure. The Department's modeling found 300 MW to be cost-effective under numerous scenarios, while Minnesota Power recommended 100 MW, cautioning that acquiring too much wind generation would cause an energy surplus. This scenario could result in a net cost if the Company is unable to generate sufficient revenue by selling the surplus energy on the wholesale market. The Commission concludes that Minnesota Power should begin a competitive acquisition process, by the end of 2017, to procure 100-300 MW of installed wind capacity. This range reflects the positions of both parties; the final amount can be resolved in a future resource -acquisition proceeding with the benefit of specific proposals. VIII. Solar Additions A. Introduction Minnesota's Solar Energy Standard (SES) requires a public utility to generate or procure sufficient electricity from solar energy so that by the end of 2020, at least 1.5 percent of the utility's total retail electric sales in Minnesota is generated by solar energy. 10 Minnesota Power calculated that it would need to acquire 33 MW of solar generation during the planning period to meet and sustain the 1.5 -percent -by -2020 requirement. The Company plans to acquire 11 MW of solar in 2016,12 MW in 2020, and 10 MW in 2025. Minnesota Power does not plan any solar additions beyond what is necessary to meet the Solar Energy Standard, but it recognized that solar power may become more cost-effective as the price of generating it decreases. B. Positions of the Parties The Department supported Minnesota Power's SES compliance strategy. Long term, the Department recommended that the Company procure an additional 50 MW of solar, partly to replace Boswell Units 1 and 2. The Department's modeling suggested a strong preference for 50 MW of solar generation as part of a cost-effective package of resources to replace the retiring coal units. The Clean Energy Organizations argued that Minnesota Power's modeling methodology disfavored the selection of solar by overstating its unit cost and allowing the model to accept only one solar farm starting in 2017. C. Commission Action The Commission concurs with Minnesota Power and the Department that the Company should acquire 11 MW of solar generation by 2016, 12 MW by 2020, and 10 MW by 2025 to meet is SES obligations. But the Commission also agrees with the Department and the Clean Energy Organizations that additional solar generation is likely a cost-effective resource for Minnesota Power's system. The market for solar generation is still evolving; however, under the Department's modeling, when solar was priced at the median or lower levels—a range of $80 to $100 per megawatt hour (MWh)—the model tended to select 100 MW or more of solar in addition to the amount needed io Minn. Stat. § 21613.1691, subd. 2f(a). "Total retail electric sales" excludes sales to iron mining extraction and processing facilities, paper mills, wood products manufacturers, sawmills, and oriented strand board manufacturers. Id., subd. 2f(d). 10 for SES compliance. Given that the Commission recently approved another utility's 187 MW solar portfolio with a levelized price of $73.20 per MWh,11 a range of $80-100 per MWh may overstate the cost of solar generation. For these reasons, the Commission finds that up to 100 MW of solar by 2022 is likely an economic resource for Minnesota Power's system and will require that the Company account for this finding in any competitive acquisition process. IX. Energy Conservation A. Introduction Minnesota's conservation -improvement -program (CTP) statute sets an annual energy -savings goal of 1.5 percent of gross annual retail sales for each utility, subject to modification by the Department. 12 Minnesota Power's currently approved conservation -improvement program calls for annual energy savings of 46.5 gigawatt hours (GWh), or 1.5% of its gross annual retail sales. 13 Large customers that face competitive or economic pressures to conserve energy may petition the Department for an exemption from their utility's conservation -improvement program. 14 Sales to CIP-exempt customers are not included in a utility's gross annual retail sales for the purposes of calculating compliance with its energy -savings goal, nor are CIP costs included in exempt customers' rates. Almost 70 percent of Minnesota Power's load comes from approximately 14 large, CIP-exempt customers. None of this load is subject to the Company's energy -savings goal under its conservation -improvement program. In Minnesota Power's last resource -plan proceeding, the Commission directed the Company to provide, in its next resource plan, cost assumptions for achieving energy savings beyond 1.5 percent of non-CIP-exempt retail sales. 15 The Commission also required the Company to provide data on embedded energy savings from its CIP-exempt and non-CIP-exempt customers and to evaluate conservation scenarios for achieving greater savings by both groups of customers. 16 In this resource plan, Minnesota Power evaluated four CIP savings scenarios: 11 In the Matter ofXcel Energy's Petition for Approval of a Solar Portfolio to Meet Initial Solar Energy Standard, Docket No. E -002/M-14-162, Order Approving Solar Portfolio, at 3 (March 24, 2015). 12 Minn. Stat. § 216B.241, subd. lc. " See In the Matter of Minnesota Pomer's 2014-2016 Energy Conservation Improvement Plan, Docket No. E-015/CIP-13-409. " Minn. Stat. § 216B.241, subd. la(b) 15 2013 Resource Plan Order, at 8. 16 Id 11 The Company proposed a resource -planning goal of procuring 57.3 GWh in annual energy savings, or 1.87 percent of annual retail sales. B. Positions of the Parties 1. Energy -Savings Goal The Department recommended that Minnesota Power procure average annual energy savings of 76.5 GWh, or 2.5 percent of its non-CIP-exempt sales. It stated that the Company has consistently exceeded the statutory 1.5 -percent energy -savings goal since 2009 and has met or exceeded 1.87 percent since 2010. And, in 2014, the Company achieved savings of 2.49 percent. The Department's modeling found that the overall cost-effectiveness of Minnesota Power's resource plan increased with the level of energy efficiency. It concluded that the 76.5-GWh savings scenario would provide a low-cost energy supply and potentially help the Company to defer the need for future resource acquisitions in a time of significant uncertainty with respect to future load. Minnesota Power opposed a long-term resource -planning assumption of 2.5 percent energy savings. The Company acknowledged that it had achieved comparable savings in previous years, but characterized this achievement as the exception to the rule, dependent on certain large, irregular customer -specific projects. It argued that these projects' contribution skewed past results and that those savings should be normalized before being used for resource planning. 2. CIP-Exempt Customers The Clean Energy Organizations argued that Minnesota Power had ignored the possibility of obtaining additional energy savings from its CIP-exempt customers. They argued that the Commission's prior order confirmed that sales to CIP-exempt customers must be considered in determining progress toward the statewide energy -savings goals described in Minn. Stat. §§ 21613.2401 and 216C.05. And they recommended that the Commission direct Minnesota Power to proactively seeks ways to increase conservation by its CIP-exempt customers. The Large Power Intervenors argued that Minnesota Power is not required to verify the energy savings of its CIP-exempt customers. According to these intervenors, the CIP statute recognizes that large industrial customers are subject to competitive pressures to reduce costs and improve energy efficiency and allows them to seek CIP exemption on that basis. Thus, CIP-exempt 12 Annual Savings Energy Percent of Incremental Plan Savings Sales Cost (GWh) (millions) Existing 46.5 1.5% $0.0 +11 GWh 57.3 1.87% $2.7 +15 GWh 61.2 2.0% $4.1 +30 GWh 76.5 2.5% $10.5 The Company proposed a resource -planning goal of procuring 57.3 GWh in annual energy savings, or 1.87 percent of annual retail sales. B. Positions of the Parties 1. Energy -Savings Goal The Department recommended that Minnesota Power procure average annual energy savings of 76.5 GWh, or 2.5 percent of its non-CIP-exempt sales. It stated that the Company has consistently exceeded the statutory 1.5 -percent energy -savings goal since 2009 and has met or exceeded 1.87 percent since 2010. And, in 2014, the Company achieved savings of 2.49 percent. The Department's modeling found that the overall cost-effectiveness of Minnesota Power's resource plan increased with the level of energy efficiency. It concluded that the 76.5-GWh savings scenario would provide a low-cost energy supply and potentially help the Company to defer the need for future resource acquisitions in a time of significant uncertainty with respect to future load. Minnesota Power opposed a long-term resource -planning assumption of 2.5 percent energy savings. The Company acknowledged that it had achieved comparable savings in previous years, but characterized this achievement as the exception to the rule, dependent on certain large, irregular customer -specific projects. It argued that these projects' contribution skewed past results and that those savings should be normalized before being used for resource planning. 2. CIP-Exempt Customers The Clean Energy Organizations argued that Minnesota Power had ignored the possibility of obtaining additional energy savings from its CIP-exempt customers. They argued that the Commission's prior order confirmed that sales to CIP-exempt customers must be considered in determining progress toward the statewide energy -savings goals described in Minn. Stat. §§ 21613.2401 and 216C.05. And they recommended that the Commission direct Minnesota Power to proactively seeks ways to increase conservation by its CIP-exempt customers. The Large Power Intervenors argued that Minnesota Power is not required to verify the energy savings of its CIP-exempt customers. According to these intervenors, the CIP statute recognizes that large industrial customers are subject to competitive pressures to reduce costs and improve energy efficiency and allows them to seek CIP exemption on that basis. Thus, CIP-exempt 12 customers are responsible for planning, financing, and implementing their own energy -conservation and efficiency efforts. The Department agreed with the Clean Energy Organizations that Minnesota Power should encourage its CIP-exempt customers to be as efficient as possible. However, it stated that because the UP statute does not allow the Company to charge these customers for providing CIP services, it is not clear how the Company would engage with the customers and document their energy savings. C. Commission Action The Commission concurs with the Department that Minnesota Power's average annual energy savings goal should be set at 76.5 GWh for resource -planning purposes. The Department's modeling demonstrated that this level of energy savings would result in the lowest -cost expansion plan for the Company's system. Moreover, planning for a high level of energy savings recognizes that it is Minnesota's preferred energy resource. 17 Minnesota Power expressed concern that it would not be able to achieve historic levels of energy savings. However, the Department's analysis showed that the level of energy savings selected does not affect the recommended supply-side resources. In other words, even if Minnesota Power is unable to achieve the savings goal set in this plan, it will still have enough generation to meet projected demand. And finally, because resource planning is an iterative process, the Commission can revisit the Company's energy -savings goal in its next plan and adjust it if appropriate. The Commission agrees with the Department and the Large Power Intervenors that verifying the energy savings of Minnesota Power's CIP-exempt customers could present practical and legal challenges. However, the Commission also agrees with the Clean Energy Organizations that the Company should pursue conservation measures in which its CIP-exempt customers may participate voluntarily. Accordingly, the Commission will require Minnesota Power to (1) propose a demand -response competitive -bidding process within six months of the date of this order and (2) investigate the potential for an energy -efficiency competitive -bidding process and summarize its investigation and findings in the next resource plan. These measures hold the potential both to promote state policy favoring energy savings and to benefit large customers competing in global markets. X. Bilateral Contracts In Minnesota Power's last resource -plan proceeding, the Commission approved the Company's plan to pursue cost-effective bilateral market purchases to cover an anticipated generation shortfall between 2014 and 2020.18 The Commission directed the Company to file the pertinent details of any bilateral contract it entered into. 19 17 See Minn. Stat. § 216B.2401 ("The legislature finds that energy savings are an energy resource, and that cost-effective energy savings are preferred over all other energy resources.") 18 2013 Resource Plan Order, at 7. 19 Irl 13 In August and September 2014 and March 2015, Minnesota Power made compliance filings detailing bilateral capacity and energy contracts that it had entered into to address resource needs through 2020. In fall 2015, the Company executed three additional bilateral contracts for baseload power to be delivered in 2017-2019. The Company intends that these contracts will replace the energy and capacity lost when it retires Taconite Harbor Units 1 and 2. The Company did not file the details of these contracts until May 2016. At hearing, it stated that it understood the filing requirement in the prior order to refer only to contracts executed to address the specific need identified in its 2013 resource plan. The Commission will continue to require that Minnesota Power file the pertinent details of its major bilateral contracts, such as the duration, price, and amount of capacity and energy. This requirement will ensure that the Commission, the Department, and other stakeholders have timely information on how the Company is planning for and addressing anticipated resource needs. To avoid creating an undue administrative burden, the Commission will limit the filing requirement to contracts exceeding one year or 50 MW. XI. Resource -Plan Approval For all the foregoing reasons, the Commission will approve Minnesota Power's 2015 resource plan as modified by this order. ORDER 1. The Commission approves Minnesota Power's 2015 Integrated Resource Plan with the modifications below. 2. Minnesota Power's range of load forecasting used for its 2015 resource plan is reasonable for planning purposes; however, in light of updated information, Minnesota Power's load forecast scenarios used in its 2015 resource plan may overstate the size or timing of future needs. 3. Minnesota Power shall idle Taconite Harbor Energy Center Units 1 and 2 in 2016, retain the ability to restart them to address reliability or emergency needs on the transmission system, and cease coal-fired operation by the end of 2020. Future refueling and re -mission opportunities will be considered in planning and optimization of the facility for the next resource plan. 4. Minnesota Power shall remedy the local transmission -system issues identified in its analysis of closing Taconite Harbor Energy Center Units 1 and 2. The Company will be allowed to recover the reasonable costs of the upgrades consistent with the estimate listed on page 16 of Appendix F of its resource plan. 5. Minnesota Power has not demonstrated at this time that its proposed investment in SO2 reduction at Boswell Units 1 and 2 is reasonable. 14 6. Minnesota Power shall retire Boswell Energy Center Units 1 and 2 when sufficient energy and capacity are available, but no later than 2022. Minnesota Power may pursue an RFP to investigate the possible procurement of combined -cycle natural gas generation to meet its energy and capacity needs in the absence of Boswell Units 1 and 2 and Taconite Harbor Units 1 and 2, with no presumption that any or all of the generation identified in that bidding process will be approved by the Commission. 8. Minnesota Power's next resource plan shall include a full analysis of all alternatives, including renewables, energy efficiency, distributed generation, and demand response, for providing energy and capacity sufficient to meet its needs. 9. By the end of 2017, Minnesota Power shall initiate a competitive -bidding process to procure 100-300 MW of installed wind capacity. 10. Minnesota Power shall acquire solar units of 11 MW by 2016, 12 MW by 2020, and 10 MW by 2025 to meet is SES obligations. 11. The Commission finds that up to 100 MW of solar by 2022 is likely an economic resource for Minnesota Power's system; the Company shall account for this finding in its request for proposals in any competitive acquisition process. 12. Minnesota Power's average annual energy savings goal is set at 76.5 GWh. 13. Minnesota Power shall propose a demand -response competitive -bidding process within six months of the date of this order. 14. Minnesota Power shall investigate the potential for an energy -efficiency competitive - bidding process to supplement its existing conservation -improvement program, open to both CIP-exempt and non-CIP-exempt customers, and shall summarize its investigation and findings in its next resource plan. 15. Minnesota Power shall submit an annual report by August 1 of each year, to include: a. Whether Taconite Harbor Energy Center Units 1 and 2 were selected in MISO's annual capacity auction; b. Whether Taconite Harbor Energy Center Units 1 and 2 will receive capacity accreditation in each MISO planning year; C. How often the units were dispatched in the previous planning year; d. For the previous and upcoming planning year, how much fuel was and will be delivered to the Taconite Harbor Energy Center site; and e. Quantification and demonstration of how and why the economic idling of Taconite Harbor Energy Center Units 1 and 2 is in the ratepayers' interests. 15 16. Minnesota Power shall file the pertinent details of its bilateral contracts that exceed one year or 50 MW, such as the duration, price, and amount of capacity and associated energy to be procured, within 30 days after the contracts are signed. 17. Minnesota Power shall file its next resource plan on February 1, 2018. 18. This order shall become effective immediately. BY ORDER OF THE COMMISSION ewe !' w� Daniel P. Wolf Executive Secretary This document can be made available in alternative formats (e.g., large print or audio) by calling 651.296.0406 (voice). Persons with hearing loss or speech disabilities may call us through their preferred Telecommunications Relay Service. 16 Becker • Cohasset • Granite Falls • Hoyt Lakes • Monticello • Oak Park Heights • Red Wing PRE -SESSION STRATEGY MEETING Coalition of Utility Cities December 8, 2016 10:00 a.m. — 12:00 .p.m. Offices of Flaherty & Hood, P.A. 525 Park Street, Suite 470 St. Paul, MN 55103 AGENDA 1. Welcome, Introductions and Approve Annual Meeting minutes (Jeff O'Neill) 2. Election Update (CJ) 3. CUC Introductory materials for new city officials, legislators (CJ, CH) 4. Public Utilities Commission hearing on Xcel IRP (CJ, Rick Henderson) 5. Discussion of electric generation tax reform plan (CJ, BP) 6. Other Legislative issues: Coal ash, environmental health tracking (CJ) 7. Clean Power Plan update (CJ) 8. Update on Plant Activities in Communities (Members) 9. Review of other legislative policies for 2017 (CJ, BP) 10. City Visits 11. Other Business 12. Adjourn Boxed lunches will be served for attendees. U I 1 LL I I Y t.. I I I t-- Becker = Becker * Cohasset • Granite Falls • Hoyt Lakes + Monticello • Oak Park Heights + Red Wing 2016-2017 Policy Positions Support of the "electric generation tax base" proposal, first proposed in 2015 as SF1636 (Skoe, DFL, Clearbrook), which replaces the personal property tax on electric generation equipment and its exclusions and exemptions with a valuation based on generation capacity, production rate and nuclear fuel storage. This support is conditioned on the inclusion of state transition aid for cities which lose tax base as a result of the change in the law and on the inclusion of an adjustment factor to the electric generation tax base which reflects the increased value of electric generation over time. 2. Tax cuts to utilities have gone too far in shifting the property tax burden in host communities onto homeowners and other property tax payers. The Coalition of Utility Cities opposes any legislative attempt to give investor owned utilities more property tax relief at the expense of host communities and supports phasing out personal and real property tax exemptions for electric generation facilities and equipment. 3. The Coalition of Utility Cities supports continuation of the personal property tax on replacement equipment at all electric generation facilities that currently pay the personal property tax or a tax system which generates equal or greater revenue for host cities. 4. The Coalition of Utility Cities supports the inclusion of intangible costs (environmental impacts, etc) and opportunity costs (safety, economic development, etc) imposed on host cities in any analysis by the Department of Revenue and legislators in assessing appropriate property tax compensation provided by electric generation facilities. 5. Incentives for environmental improvements should not reduce the tax base of host communities. The costs of these improvements should be shared by all Minnesotans because all Minnesotans benefit from these improvements. The Coalition of Utility Cities supports narrowing or eliminating the pollution control equipment exemption and the limitation of the sliding scale exclusion for coal plants under 75 mw undergoing conversion (as passed by the 2014 Legislature) 6. In 2008, the omnibus tax bill provided host cities replacement aid to offset the significant reduction in tax revenue suffered by host cities as a result of the Department of Revenue's (MDOR) new utility valuation rules. The Coalition of Utility Cities opposes any statutory changes to the Utility Valuation Transition Aid program or any unallotment, reduction or delay in payments of this aid unless it is replaced by equal or greater revenue to host Approved by the Coalition of Utility Cities on August 17, 2016 cities. If the replacement aid is reduced to balance the budget, it is the position of the Coalition that the class rate on electric generation property should be increased to offset the loss of aid. 7. The Coalition of Utility Cities supports legislation to significantly increase the audit and compliance resources of the MDOR's property tax division. 8. The Coalition of Utility Cities recognizes that coal and nuclear generation are important components of Minnesota's baseload portfolio and these facilities are necessary to deliver reliable, efficient, and cost-effective energy. 9. Coal-fired generation facilities rely on timely deliveries to maintain inventory stockpiles. Host cities have additional public safety and traffic concerns with rail blockages. Accordingly, the Coalition of Utility Cities supports efforts to improve freight rail operations and capacity in Minnesota. 10. The Coalition of Utility Cities supports the preparation of a state plan to address the long term needs of Host Utility Cities upon the closure of all or part of an electric generation facility. 11. The Coalition of Utility Cities supports legislative changes to state laws regulating municipal consent on siting of alternative energy facilities within 2 miles of municipal boundaries or an otherwise designated joint planning area. Approved by the Coalition of Utility Cities on August 17, 2016 7wom on "m1�1 • � wno,, in Becker • Cohasset • Granite Falls • Hoyt Lakes • Monticello • Oak Park Heights • Red Wing CUC 2016-2017 Work Plan and Budget Approved August 17, 2016 Considerations which will impact budget expenditures • After the 2016 elections, there may be new legislators to education about CUC issues. • 2016 is a budget session, which is the "long" session, January 3 to May 22 (at the latest) • Level of agreement/dissent among stakeholders for reform of tax on energy producing equipment. • Extent to which CUC cities wish to engage in Clean Power Plan for Minnesota • Extent to which CUC cities wish to pursue economic development, state aid or other responses to plant closures or conversions and Clean Power Plan • Extent to which CUC cities wish to participate in railroad capacity/safety debate. • Interest in issues relating to solar facility siting. Research Activities $15,000-20,000 Perform research on the effects of cities hosting electricity production plants: • Track and analyze new EPA clean air rule (111(d)) as it applies to existing power plants. • Research land use and valuation issues associated with closure of power plants. • Evaluate host city options to handle effects of the Clean Power Plan and closure/conversion of power plants. • Research other economic development opportunities for host cities such as coal ash mining. • Research impact of proposed changes to electricity plant taxation. • As needed, research of legislative and agency initiatives or actions. Monitoring Activities $20,000 - $30,000 Monitor key activities of legislature, agencies, task forces, and courts that may have impact on CUC interests. • Monitor state and federal regulatory changes (PUC, EPA & MPCA) that may impact CUC city plants. • Monitor the EPA's proposed Clean Power Plan and the State's response. Prepared by Flaherty & Hood, P.A. for the Coalition of Utility Cities — 111292016 Monitor PUC proceedings with respect to CLIC interests, including the Xcel IRP, decommissioning, storage, and rate issues involving property taxes, and the investigation of environmental and socioeconomic costs of electricity production. Monitor bill introductions and committee hearings for legislation and amendments that may implicate CLIC interests. Monitor conference committees of bills affecting CLIC interests. Advocacy Activities $35,000 - $45,000 Advocate CLIC's interests at Legislature, Department of Revenue, Pollution Control Agency and Governor's office. • Prepare handouts and supporting material. • Prepare correspondence to agencies and legislators. • Meet with CLIC member legislators and work to solidify support for legislation. Continue communication throughout legislative session. • Meet with tax chairs and tax committee members to discuss utility taxation legislation. • Meet with economic development chairs and committee members about response to Clean Power Plan and plant closures or conversions • Meet with environment chairs and committee members about response to Clean Power Plan and plant closures. • Meet with chairs and members of other committees if other legislation related to CLIC interests arises. • Meet with Department of Revenue as needed regarding taxation of electricity plants. • Meet with MN Pollution Control Agency as needed regarding the Clean Power Plan. • Meet with other stakeholders, including utilities and environmental groups as needed. • Draft legislation, secure authors and introduce bills. • Secure hearings as needed for legislation. • Identify testifiers and prepare talking points. Communication and Member Services $10,000 - $15,000 Communicate with member cities regarding activities described above. Arrange and conduct meetings and other member activities. • Draft regular updates for member cities on results of monitoring and advocacy work. • Visit with city councils (as requested). • Arrange pre -session and annual meetings. Arrange other meetings and teleconferences on as -needed basis. • Prepare Final Report for members. Total Range: $80,000 - $110,000 Prepared by Flaherty & Hood, P.A. for the Coalition of Utility Cities —1112912016 Coalition of Utility Cities Annual Meeting August 17, 2016 Meeting Minutes as approved Present: Greg Pruszinske, Rick Hendrickson, Jeff O'Neill, Charlotte Gabler, Mary McComber, Mark Skelton (by phone), Max Peters (by phone), Greg Hagy (by phone) Crystal Johnson (by phone), David Smiglewski (by phone) Bradley Peterson, Carolyn Jackson and Chris Henjum. Coalition President Greg Pruszinske called the meeting to order at 10:06 a.m. Everyone introduced themselves. Crystal Johnson is the new city administrator for Granite Falls. The proposed agenda was adopted. Carolyn Jackson then gave a review of the past year. Highlights included the bill introduced in the Senate to reform the tax system for electric generation, the federal Clean Power Plan which regulates the carbon dioxide emissions from existing power plants, the proposed Xcel Integrated Resource Plan which proposes closing Sherco II in 2023 and Sherco I in 2026, the Legislature's response to rail safety and solar siting issues and visits to member cities The group continues to support the proposed tax reform plan so long as it holds cities harmless. Regarding plant closures, we discussed possible future options for addressing the impact of plant closures or conversions, including economic development activities or use of Clean Power Plan emissions credits. On the issue of solar siting, Jeff O'Neill gave us a summary of what had happened in Monticello. The PUC ruled that community solar gardens cannot be chained to create large solar plants. This started a series of events which ended with abandonment of the proposed Monticello area solar plant. However, he encouraged us to keep working for local control of solar siting rather than PUC control. One of the policy reasons for doing this is to encourage joint planning for land use to avoid annexation battles. A bill which allowed joint planning entities to make solar siting decisions was discussed. One issue raised is that the joint planning decisions would need to be unanimous from all its members. The next item on the agenda was the treasurer's report. Rick Hendrickson moved the report as submitted by Marshall Hallock. Mary McComber seconded. The motion passed and the Treasurer's report was adopted. The group then discussed its policies and procedures. Based on the discussion regarding solar siting, policy 11 was amended to read "the Coalition of Utility Cities supports legislative changes to state laws regulating municipal consent on siting of alternative energy facilities within 2 miles of municipal boundaries or an otherwise desienated ioint olannine area." Mary McComber moved the policies and procedures as amended. Rick Hendrickson seconded. Jeff O'Neill then discussed a new issue for possible inclusion in the policies and procedures. Employees at the Monticello plant have been discussing whether the land under transmission lines could be planted with pollinator friendly plants. Because each city has such different land use under its transmission lines, the group decided this would not be an issue to add to the policies and procedures at this time, but was worth some research by Flaherty and Hood. With that, the policies and procedures were adopted. The group then took up the proposed budget and work plan. Research of pollinator plants under transmission lines was added to "research activities." With that amendment, Jeff O'Neill moved the budget and work plan. Mary McComber seconded. The plan was adopted. The group then discussed the possible rebate of funds to members. The formula used in 2106 was the balance of funds minus the largest estimated budget for the previous two years. The motion to rebate excess funds using this formula passed. Election of Officers. Mary McComber moved and Jeff O'Neill seconded the following slate of officers: President Greg Pruszinske, Vice President Jeff O'Neill and Secretary/Treasurer Marshall Hallock. The motion passed. Mary McComber then moved that Greg Pruszinske have the authority to sign a contract with Flaherty & Hood, P.A. Rick Hendrickson seconded. The motion passed. Plant Updates Becker. Rick Hendrickson reported that Xcel is continuing with its proposed Integrated Resource Plan to close Sherco II in 2023 and Sherco I in 2026, despite the stay on the Clean Power Plan. Xcel is petitioning to have a combined cycle natural gas plant of approximately 700 — 750 mW built in Becker. Legislation directing this fell apart at the Legislature. Xcel wants to build the plant using its internal resources, but the MN Department of Commerce wants Xcel to bid out the work. Beckerwould like to see the gas plant built before Sherco I closes in 2026. Sherco III is a "black start" plant, and the gas plant would ensure continued electric service. Becker filed comments in favor of the proposed IRP, with the intent that they want to get on board early and secure Xcel's help in economic development for the area. Oak Park Heights. Mary McComber reported that things were quiet at the King plant. There had been a steam issue, but that has been resolved. Their contact is currently on leave. Monticello. Jeff O'Neill said there had been a joint training exercise between the fire department and the Xcel fire brigade that went well. Then he reported about plans surrounding a possible second interchange on 1-94 near Monticello. A joint powers board has been formed with Monticello, Big Lake Township and Big Lake to study a connection between 1-94 and Highway 10. Xcel has been part of the talks, especially about the river crossing. There is a possibility of this being a multi -modal project with a highway -train intersection in Big Lake. Regarding nuclear licensure, it was Jeffs understanding that Xcel wished to resolve the issues with coal in the current Integrated Resource Plan and address nuclear power in the next (2018) integrated resource plan. Granite Falls. Dave Smiglewski reported that there was new evidence that the Granite Falls plant would not be reopened—the dam for the cooling reservoir had recently been removed. Granite Falls would like to explore economic development opportunities to infill the lost tax base when the plant is removed. Currently the cost of removal is estimated at $10 million - $20 million. Cohasset. Greg Hagy reported that Units 1 and 2 of the Boswell plant may be closing between 2021 and 2025. The proposed natural gas power plant that had been discussed and rejected in February of this year has come back. Minnesota Power has put out an RFP for a provider to build a plant and operate it and sell the power to Minnesota Power. The PUC has requested to see an analysis of whether this would be a cheaper solution for ratepayers. Hoyt Lakes. Mark Skelton reported that the retrofit of the plant is finished. Due to the hot weather, the plant has been fired up a few times this summer. Currently, they are seeing some new economic development opportunities in the area. There being no further business, President Pruszinske adjourned the meeting at 12:04 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Carolyn Jackson Senior Lobbyist Flaherty & Hood, P.A. N O G "'0 c� L O 0 LL N O N v 0 ate--+ f6 U U Lli J +' V mo rl -0 C) co z� Lr, M Ln ryi O =t�A 41 U .. .. O r ja • - � oc I oc W U L7 = O cn 0 �� 0) n aq O M r_. ro 0 91 G 03 u� S sv_• (P (? CD �rh tv ro 0 91 G 03 u� S sv_• (P (? CD L � - U ^ X O N 4-j p O buo O ._ .— CL p Ln N •- 4-1 � i N N o. X ca Q) ca C) 4 4-1 � LL > C CO v .p v 0 O ( ca N � 0 (DD (/) CD � v) � V) n rD rD co m m a)(D;P7- Do �' fD o o -no r+ o .. D _ C D ;17 �--� n� m (D E3 n. rD � v = �' ° C zT N r O (A O h rDD G n ^C l / r fD aq F bn O o .� N 0 v N _0 L.L QJ U N > E N dJ O m m N CO U i .La - C: C (6 m t U C C C ro LU O 0 0 0 0 .. N O O O C dJ C C C O = N = un > ru U U a U2 V U Uv S m 1 I 0 M I I I I Recker • Cohasset • Granite Falls • Hort Lakes • Alonucello • Oak Park Heights • Red Wing The Coalition of Utility Cities: Representing the Unique Interests of Host Utility Cities Who we are. The Coalition of Utility Cities consists of seven cities that host Investor Owned Utility electric generation plants. The Coalition of Utility Cities lobbies to ensure adequate compensation to our communities for the unique services involved in hosting these plants. Electric Generation Taxation Reform Proposal Tax reform introduced in 2015 eliminates the personal property tax on electric generation equipment, distribution and transmission, and the "unitary valuation" and creates an electric generation property tax base calculated on objective measures. For electric generation, the formula is based on: Nameplate capacity plus average annual production plus nuclear storage waste. For transmission, the formula is based on: Line miles within the taxing jurisdiction plus substation capacity. • For distribution, the formula is based on the number of customers within the taxing jurisdiction. Coalition of Utility Cities Position on Reform The Coalition of Utility Cities supports the proposed electric generation tax reform so long as two elements are part of the change: 1. Compensation to communities who lose tax base as a result of the reform; and 2. A factor to increase the tax base over time based on an objective measure of inflation. n LAIITinNi LII Y V1 l IC,b ®NE'I2 Recker • Cohassct • Granite Falls • Hol¢ Lakes • Alocarcello • Oak Park Heights • Red Wing The Coalition of Utility Cities: Representing the Unique Interests of Host Utility Cities Becker (15B), Cohasset (5B), Granite Falls (17A and 16A), Hoyt Lakes (6B), Monticello (29B), Oak Park Heights (39B) Red Wing (21A) Who we are. The Coalition of Utility Cities consists of seven cities that host Investor Owned Utility electric generation plants. The Coalition lobbies to represent the unique issues cities face in hosting large electric generation plants Many people benefit from the generation of electricity, but host cities bear the burden of providing unique services for hosting electric generation plants such as increased public safety and transportation burdens. Therefore, Investor Owned Utilities pay host communities a personal property tax on electric generating equipment. This tax compensates host cities for this burden. State law guarantees electric utilities a rate of return on their business because they are regulated monopolies. This way the cost gets distributed to those who benefit from the generation of electricity. Our focus. Over time, property tax burdens in host communities have shifted away from utilities and onto local residents and businesses. The Coalition of Utility Cities lobbies on behalf of the interest of residents and local businesses. Looking to the future. The nature of electric generation is changing away from fossil fuels and towards renewable energy. The Coalition of Utility Cities seeks to ensure our communities have the resources they need to deal with these changes. 1 Prepared for the Coalition of Utility Cities by Flaherty & Hood. PA., 12/9/2016. Contact Carolyn .Jackson cclacicstm(<_ltlahert},-hood.com Becker I Cohasset , Granite Sells • Hoyt Lakes • Monticello • Oak Park Heights • Red Wing Member Cities Beckerhosts Xcel Energy's three Sherburne County (Sherco) generating stations: 680 mW Sherco I, 682 mW Sherco II, and 860 mW Sherco III. Cohassethosts Minnesota Power/Allete's " Clay Boswell 1,073 mW coal fired I ni.el generating stations. ra,w, Granite Falls hosts Xcel Energy's Minnesota Valley 46 mW coal fired generating plant which is idled. Hoyt lakes hosts Minnesota Power/Allete's Syl Laskin 55 mW natural gas fired peaking plant. Monticello hosts Xcel Energy's Monticello 671 mW nuclear generating station. Oak Park Heights hosts Xcel Energy's Allen S. King 511 mW coal-fired generating station. Nalln PPB$' cieMwm. tNer RemmV wBm�. c�a�an� '�9a o°h°atewe o�omh i r«oue r.w'' aaia«d MINNESOTA Md> MAo �. Mlnneep20% Mlnml Minohl a S8I Pfi i Blaominglon Mnohsp � No"11& RacheMer Va"w" I a_ s MAT. Red Wing hosts Xcel Energy's Prairie Island 1100 mW Nuclear Generating Station. 2 Prepared for the Coalition of Utility Cities by Flaherty & Hood, P.A , 12/9/2016. Contact Carolyn Jackson cejackson@n flaherty-hood.com Recker • Cohosset • Granite Falls • Hoyt Lakes • Alonticello I Oak Park Heights • Red Wing The current system for taxing electric generation in Minnesota: It's complicated.... Personal Property Tax. Coal, natural gas and nuclear electricity generating plants are subject to a personal property tax on equipment (Mn Stat. 272.02 subd. 9(a)). Unitary Valuation. The process of determining the taxable value of each plant involves the MN Department of Revenue applying a multi -state evaluation of utility property and establishment of unit value for generation, transmission and distribution equipment. The process of determining this value is called "apportionment." The total value in Minnesota is distributed across types of property located within each taxing entity. The apportioned value is the basis for setting the "taxable tax capacity," to which a local taxing entity then applies its tax rate to set its levy. Pollution Control Exemption. The pollution control equipment on these plants is exempt from taxation. (Mn Stat. 272.02 subd. 10). Exclusions Some specific facilities are excluded from the personal property tax by statutue. (Mn Stat. 272.02). This exemption is not uniform across the State. • Furthermore, a sliding scale exclusion for the value of electric generation equipment is applied to upgrades and efficiencies added to existing plants. (Mn Stat. 272.0211). New facilities must be under 75mW to qualify. 3 Prepared for the Coalition of Utility Cities by Fl.dxny & Hood, P.A., 12/9/2016. Contact Carolyn Jackson ccjackson(,i)flahert},-hood.com . . . 0M --i . ��� ►� lip Becker • Cohasset - GraniteFalls • Huyt Lakes • Alonti M. • Oak Park Heights - Red Wing Electric Generation Taxation Reform Department of Revenue Report. In 2014, the Minnesota Legislature asked the Department of Revenue to summarize the way the State taxes electric generation. The Minnesota Department of Revenue released its "Study of Energy Producing Systems" in February, 20151. This study did not make any recommendations, concluding that "Minnesota's value -based property tax system—with exemptions, exclusions, and production tax elements—provides various levels of compensation to host communities." Reform introduced, In response, the MN Senate introduced a comprehensive reform of the way to tax electric generation, based on objective measures. This reform exempted wind and solar generation which are currently subject to production taxes. How the newsystem would work. The new system of taxation sets the tax capacity on capacity, production, distribution and transmission. There are three basic formulas: 1. For the electric generation equipment calculation, the tax capacity would be calculated based on a combination of equipment nameplate capacity, average annual production and nuclear waste storage. 1 www.revenue.state.mn.us/propertytax/reports/Energy-Producing-Systems-Studypdf 4 Prepared for the Coalition of Utility Cities by Flaherty & Hood, P.A., 12/9/2016. Contact Carolyn Jackson ccjactc%on n flaherty-hocd.corn Becker - Cohasset I Granite Falls • Hoyt Lakes • Monticello • Oak Park Heights • Red Wing 2. Tax capacity for transmission is based on the line miles within the taxing jurisdiction. The tax capacity for substations is based on the sum of the substation capacity. 3. For distribution lines, the tax capacity comes from the number of customers in the taxing jurisdiction The law applies a rate to each of these objective factors based on power source, and that rate increases over time according to an objective measure (the percent change in the gross domestic product for nonresidential investment as reported by the US Bureau of Economic Analysis.) The new proposal included "replacement aid" for communities that would lose revenue, either due to a change in the law or a material loss of electricity -related tax base. Finally, the reform would repeal the personal property tax on electric generating equipment, transmission and distribution, as well as all of the exemptions and exclusions related to that tax. Prospects for reform. In 2016, this reform was not included in the final omnibus tax bill. However, the host utility cities and the investor owned utilities have both signaled that they are interested in continuing to pursue passage of this reform. s Prepared for the Coalition of Utility Cities by Flaherty & Hood, P A. 12/9/2016. Contact Carolyn Jackson cclackson((;)flaherty-hood.com �Nr 11 , I, ■ ,,:,I Becker • Cohasset - Gaai a Falls • Hoyt Lakes - Monticello • Oak Park Heights Red Wing Changing Environmental Regulation and Utility Response Background. The federal Clean Air Act regulates electric generation plants as point sources. In 2015, the Environmental Protection Agency issued a new regulation under the Clean Air Act, known as the Clean Power Plan, The Clean Power Plan seeks to regulate carbon dioxide emissions from existing power plants by setting state goals on emissions. The EPA will set goals for individual states. The states in turn can choose to regulate either the rate of CO2 emissions or the mass of carbon emitted by power plants. While this rule is currently stayed pending litigation at the federal district court level, the State of Minnesota and its investor owned utilities have continued to proceed with plans to implement the rule. While the new federal administration may oppose the Clean Power Plan, it is unclear what steps it can or will take to stop the rule. The EPA must go through the same long process to repeal a rule as it undergoes to create a new rule. Also, the litigation involves parties in addition to the Federal Government, so it will proceed regardless of a change of administrations. Investor Owned Utility Reaction: Shift to renewab/es and natural gas. Regardless of the fate of the Clean Power Plan, Minnesota's Investor Owned Utilities plan to decrease the use of coal and rely more heavily on natural gas and renewable energy sources. Xce/Energy. In October, 2015, Xcel Energy amended its long term Preferred Resource Plan with the MN Public Utilities Commission. This Plan shifted electricity 6 Prepared for die Coalition of Utility Cities by Flaherty & Hood, P.A., 12/9/2016. Contact Carolyn Jackson ecjackson@flaherty-hood.com �CQAI MnN CSF -lJ t lL,l I Y lel I IC,b �®�119 Becker • Cohasset • Granite Palls • Ho}¢ Takes • Atonorello • Oak Park Ilcights • Red Wing production sources away from coal and towards renewables and natural gas. As a result, Xcel plans to close Sherco II in 2023 and Sherco I in 2026 prior to their license expiration dates Minnesota Power. The 2015 Integrated Resource Plan approved for Minnesota Power orders Minnesota Power to close two small units, Boswell Energy Center Units 1 and 2 no later than 2022. Minnesota Power announced in October, 2016, that it would close those units by the end of 2018. They have a combined capacity of 130 mW. Minnesota Power will replace this capacity in the short term with contracts with Manitoba Hydro and in the long term with some combination of natural gas and/or renewable generation. Coalition of Utility Cities Reaction. In response, the Coalition of Utility Cities has been monitoring the process of the integrated resource plans before the Public Utilities Commission. We are exploring ways to support the tax base of our cities in reaction to these changes, both through State action as well as cooperation with the Publicly Owned Utilities. State of Minnesota and the Clean Power Plan. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency is continuing to develop its plan to implement the national standards under the Clean Power Plan, in the event that the courts affirm the validity of the rule. One of the decisions the State will need to make regards emissions credits. An emissions credit system can work in a number of ways; however, the basis is this: Any entity which emits fewer tons of carbon than allowed by regulation gets credit Prepared for the Coalition of Utility Cities by Flaherty & Hood, P.A., 12/92016, Contact Carolyn Jackson ecjacksonr,-i� ,,flaherty-hood.com Becker • Cohasset • Granite Falls • Hupt Lakes -A londeello • Oak Park Heights • Red Wing for those savings. Those credits then can be traded or sold to entities which emit more tons of carbon than is allowed by regulation. The Clean Power Plan envisions allotting some of those credits to poor communities to pay for energy reduction investments, such as new lightbulbs or more efficient air conditioners. In 2016, Rep. Jim Newberger (R -Becker) raised the issue of allotting emission credits to host communities that would lose jobs and tax base as a result of the Clean Power Plan. The Coalition of Utility Cities holds a position that regulatory and legislative responses to the Clean Power Plan must include consideration of the socio- economic impact of reducing the use of fossil fuels for electric generation in host communities. Non -tax Issues for the Coalition of Utility Cities The Coalition of Utility Cities monitors other issues at the Legislature which impact our residents and taxpayers as a result of hosting Investor Owned Utilities. These issues include land use issues connected with solar energy siting and railroad capacity and safety issues. s Prepared for the Coalition of Utility Cities by Flaherty & Hood, P.A., 12/9/2016. Contact Carolyn Jackson ccjacloonQflaherty-hood.com Carolyn C Jackson From: Carolyn C Jackson Sent: Monday, April 24, 2017 1:46 PM To: 'Becky Burich (rburich@hoytlakes.com)'; Bradley M Peterson; 'Crystal Johnson (crystaljohnson@granitefalls.com)'; 'Dave Smiglewski'; 'Greg Hagy (grhagy@gmail.com)';'Greg Pruszinske(gpruszinske@ci.becker.mn.us)'; 'Jeff O'Neill Qeff.oneill@ci.monticello.mn.us)'; 'Kay Kuhlmann (kay.kuhlmann@ci.red-wing.mn.us)'; 'Mark Skelton'; 'Marshall Hallock (marshal Lha I I ock@ci. red-wi ng.mn.us)'; 'Mary McComber (marymccomber@aol.com)'; 'Max Peters'; 'Rick Hendrickson (rhendrickson@ci.becker.mn.us)';'Tim Flaherty' Cc: Bradley M Peterson; Chris J Henjum; Timothy Flaherty; Shane A. Zahrt Subject: Brief CUC update Hi Coalition of Utility Cities members, Last week, House Tax Chair Greg Davids (R -Preston) sent a pair of letters to MN Tax Commissioner Cynthia Bauerly in regards to the electric generation tax reform bill, HF1985. In these letters and in Commissioner Bauerly's response, they agreed that the estimates and numbers runs for HF1985 should be tabled until work on the omnibus tax bill is finished. The Department appears to have done quite a bit of work putting the numbers together, but nothing will happen until the tax bill is done. Chair Davids indicated he will likely pick up work on this over the summer. hanks, and please let me know if you have any questions. Carolyn Jackson Senior Lobbyist Flaherty and Hood cciacl<son(@flaherty-hood.com Office (651) 259-1928 Cell (612) 735-2627 Carolyn C Jackson From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Carolyn C Jackson Thursday, March 23, 2017 4:28 PM 'Becky Burich (rburich@hoytlakes.com)'; Bradley M Peterson; 'Crystal Johnson (crystal johnson@granitefalls.com)'; 'Dave Smiglewski'; 'Eric A. Johnson (eajohnson@cityofoakparkheights.com)'; 'Greg Hagy (grhagy@gmail.com)'; 'Greg Pruszinske (gpruszinske@ci.becker.mn.us)'; 'Jeff O'Neill (Jeff.oneill@ci.monticello.mn.us)'; 'Kay Kuhlmann (kay.kuhlmann@ci.red-wing.mn.us)'; 'Mark Skelton'; 'Marshall Hallock (marshall.hallock@ci.red-wing.mn.us)'; 'Mary McComber (marymccomber@aol.com)'; 'Max Peters'; 'Rick Hendrickson(rhendrickson@ci.becker.mn.us)';'Tim Flaherty' Bradley M Peterson; Chris J Henjum; Timothy Flaherty; Shane A. Zahrt CUC update Hi Coalition of Utility City Members, Bradley Peterson and I met with Rep. Newberger and Rep. Metsa today. The other CUC legislators were in committee (it's deadline time). We brought the legislators up to speed about the CUC meeting yesterday. Bradley happened to talk to Xcel earlier in the day today, and got an update from their end. The bottom line: The electric generation tax reform will not move forward until we get some numbers to work with. The bill's author, Rep. Davids, is devoting his time to the omnibus tax bill anyway. Xcel was cooperative in understanding our position and is not in a hurry. Rep.s Newberger and Metsa are committed to protecting their communities, and the other CUC legislators they have ,alked with are also ready to act on our behalf. I will keep you all informed if there is any news, but for now, nothing is going to happen for a while. Thank you! Carolyn Jackson Senior Lobbyist Flaherty and Hood cciacl(son@flaherty-hood.com Office (651) 259-1928 Cell (612) 735-2627 Carolyn C Jackson prom: Carolyn C Jackson Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2016 12:53 PM To: 'Becky Burich (rburich@hoytlakes.com)'; Bradley M Peterson; 'Crystal Johnson (crystal.johnson@granitefalls.com)'; 'Dave Smiglewski'; 'Greg Hagy (grhagy@gmail.com)';'Greg Pruszinske(gpruszinske@ci.becker.mn.us)';'Jeff O'Neill Oeff.oneill@ci.monticello.mn.us)'; 'Kay Kuhlmann (kay.kuhlmann@ci.red-wing.mn.us)'; 'Lynnette Brannan'; 'Mark Skelton'; 'Marshall Hallock (marshall.hallock@ci.red- wing.mn.us)'; 'Mary McComber (marymccomber@aol.com)'; 'Max Peters'; 'Rick Hendrickson(rhendrickson@ci.becker.mn.us)';'Tim Flaherty' Cc: Timothy Flaherty; Bradley M Peterson; Chris J Henjum Subject: CUC election update Hi Coalition of Utility City Members, Well, the 2016 election is over, and the voters have opted for change. Not only will this change affect who represents our CUC cities at the Legislature; it will also affect our legislative agenda. Election Update The 2016 election meant big changes for the Minnesota Legislature. Chief among these changes is the defeat of Senator Rod Skoe (D -Clearbrook), whose electric generation tax reform promised to address long standing issues for the Coalition of Utility Cities. 'lection Results for CUC Cities: .,ecker: Senator Dave Brown retired and did not seek re-election. He will be replaced by Andrew Matthews from Milaca. 1 had the opportunity to meet Mr. Matthews before the election and was very happy to learn that he is interested in Coalition of Utility Cities issues and had already spent time talking with Rep. Jim Newberger (who was re-elected) to learn about the changes happening in Becker. Cohasset: Rep. Tom Anzelc (D -Balsam Township) was defeated by Republican Sandy Layman (Cohasset). Senator Tom Saxhaug (D -Grand Rapids) was defeated by Republican Justin Eichorn (Grand Rapids). Granite Falls: Senator Gary Dahms (R -Redwood Falls), Rep. Tim Miller (R-Prinsburg) and Rep. Chris Swedzinski (R -Ghent) all were re-elected. Senator Lyle Koenen from Clara City lost to Republican Andrew Lang from Olivia. Hoyt Lakes: Rep. Jason Metsa (D -Virginia) and Senator David Tomassoni (D -Chisholm) were re-elected. Monticello: Senator Bruce Anderson (R -Buffalo) and Rep. Marion O'Neill (R -Monticello) were re-elected. Oak Park Heights: Senator Karin Housley (R -St. Mary's Point) and Rep. Kathy Lohmer (R -Stillwater) were re-elected. Red Wing: Senator Matt Schmit was defeated by Republican Mike Goggin from Red Wing. Rep. Tim Kelly did not seek re- election and was replaced by Republican Barb Haley from Red Wing. What This Means for CUC Cities and Tax Reform: Due to the planned retirement of Senator Brown and Rep. Kelly, we have been preparing a handout to introduce new legislators to the Coalition of Utility Cities, how electric generation is currently taxed, the proposed tax reform, and the impact of the Clean Power Plan on host utility cities. Now, we will have more new legislators to educate. Both Senator Skoe and Senator Koenen served on the Senate tax committee and were long-time supporters of the Coalition of Utility Cities. With their loss, we lose the institutional knowledge driving electric generation tax reform and also two of our strongest defenders. We will need to find new legislators to carry the tax reform plan and to protect our !ies' tax bases. Imoactofthe National Election: The election of a Republican president likely means the death of the Clean Power Plan. The federal Clean Power Plan was an executive rule pushed President Obama's Environmental Protection Agency. Republicans have long opposed this rule, and it currently is under a stay of action from the Supreme Court. This is one of the areas where a Trump administration can act to reverse President Obama's work without Congressional action. We will monitor actions on this as the Trump team formulates its plans. Currently, there has been little said on this front. Minnesota's clean energy mandates are statutory and will continue to pressure electric utilities to close coal plants and adopt more renewable energy. With Governor Dayton still able to veto legislation, we will be watching how aggressively Minnesota Republicans will act on changing renewable energy mandates. I look forward to a robust conversation will all of you at our planning meeting on December 8 at 10:00 a.m. We will have more information on future steps and strategy then. Please let me know if you have any questions in the meantime. Thanks for your support of the Coalition of Utility Cities. --Carolyn Carolyn Jackson Senior Lobbyist Flaherty and Hood cciackson(@flahertv-hood.com Office (651) 259-1928 Cell(612)735-2627 2 Carolyn C Jackson 'Prom: Carolyn C Jackson Sent: Monday, October 10, 2016 2:05 PM To: 'Becky Burich (rburich@hoytlakes.com)'; Bradley M Peterson; 'Crystal Johnson (crystal.johnson@granitefalls.com)'; 'Dave Smiglewski'; 'Greg Hagy (grhagy@gmail.com)'; 'Greg Pruszinske (gpruszinske@ci.becker.mn.us)'; 'Jeff O'Neill Jeff.oneill@ci.monticello.mn.us)';'Kay Kuhlmann (kay.kuhlmann@ci.red-wing.mn.us)'; Tynnette Brannan'; 'Mark Skelton'; 'Marshall Hallock (marshall.hallock@ci.red- wing.mn.us)';'Mary McComber (marymccomber@aol.com)';'Max Peters'; 'Rick Hendrickson(rhendrickson@ci.becker.mn.us)';'Tim Flaherty' Cc: Bradley M Peterson; Timothy Flaherty; Chris J Henjum Subject: Coalitition of Utilty Cities Update Hi Coalition of Utility Cities members, The Department of Commerce has filed its updated decision options for the Public Utilities Commission decision on Xcel's integrated resource plan. You can read the entire list here. The Decision Options do include discussion of Allen King and Prairie Island. Below is the language which occupied so much of Thursday's hearing regarding the decision to build a natural gas combined cycle plant in Becker: H. Sherco Units 1 and 2, Replacement '. Xcel would acquire approximately 750 MW of intermediate capacity with an in-service date . oinciding with the second Sherco retirement date—through the modified Track 2 process discussed above. Since the Company is concerned about having sufficient time to acquire the resource, allow the Company to determine the date for making a fling that will start the modified Track 2 resource acquisition process Construct a 750-800 MW natural gas combined cycle unit at the Sherco site in Becker, Minnesota with an in-service date to coincide with the second unit retirement. (Xcel, Department, City of Becker, Sherburne County, State Representative Jim Newberger) Carolyn Jackson Senior Lobbyist Flaherty and Hood cciackson(@flahertv-hood.com Office (651) 259-1928 Cell (612) 735-2627 Carolyn C Jackson From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Carolyn C Jackson Friday, October 07, 2016 4:43 PM 'Becky Burich (rburich@hoytlakes.com)'; Bradley M Peterson; 'Crystal Johnson (crystal Johnson@g ran itefalls.com)'; 'Dave Smiglewski'; 'Greg Hagy (grhagy@gmail.com)';'Greg Pruszinske(gpruszinske@ci.becker.mn.us)';'Jeff O'Neill Oeff.oneill@ci.monticello.mn.us)'; 'Kay Kuhlmann (kay.kuhlmann@ci.red-wing.mn.us)'; Tynnette Brannan'; 'Mark Skelton'; 'Marshall Hallock (marshall.hallock@ci.red- wing.mn.us)'; 'Mary McComber (marymccomber@aol.com)'; 'Max Peters'; 'Rick Hendrickson(rhendrickson@ci.becker.mn.us)';'Tim Flaherty' Bradley M Peterson; Chris J Henjum; Timothy Flaherty Coalition of Utility Cities update Good afternoon Coalition of Utility Cities members, Yesterday, October 7, 2016, the MN Public Utilities Commission (PUC) heard arguments over Xcel Energy's amended Upper Midwest Resource Plan 2016 — 2030. This is docket number 15-21 at the PUC. PUC staff filed decision options online on October 6. Just before the hearing began, staff distributed revised decision options. These revisions materially affects Becker: The change eliminated the option of constructing a 750-800 mW natural gas combined cycle unit in Becker with a generic "acquire approximately 750 mW of intermediate capacity." The impact of this statement became clear fairly quickly: the Clean Energy Organizations (CEOs) raised objections that Xcel and the Department of Commerce had not considered clean energy alternatives for this option. ,-kfter extensive questioning of Xcel, the CEOs and the Department of Commerce, the PUC decided it would deliberate and reach a decision next Thursday, October 13. Forecasting The discussion began with an examination of XceI's forecasting. The PUC questioned Xcel over the forecasted need for capacity in 2015, around the time of the closing of the second Sherco plant. In the course of this discussion, the PUC questioned whether advances in solar or wind or extending existing sources of energy such as Manitoba hydro or extending other existing sources scheduled to go off line at that time could fill that need for capacity. Xcel countered with the need for certainty under MISO guidelines, as well as the socio-economic impacts that closing Sherco will have on the community in Becker such as jobs and tax base. Rates The discussion then moved to rates. This was a highly technical discussion, which I confess I did not understand. It did not seem to impact the tax base of our host cities. Decision Timine Then the PUC questioned why an approximately 750 mW plant needed to be built in Becker around 2025, and whether that had to be part of the decision on this five year plan. At this point, everything came into play: Was it better to close the Allan King plant? Why weren't they addressing Prairie Island in this plan? Had Xcel even considered renewables as an option? Both Xcel and the Department of Commerce described in detail the process they undertook to consider alternatives. As the discussion advanced, it became clear that both had run models that showed at least 750 mW of reliable power were needed as voltage support for the nuclear plant in Monticello. Xcel explained how they had run both economic and technical models on different options, and a combined cycle plant in Becker satisfied both models. The DOC explained that their analysis also pointed to a 750 mW source in Becker. Xcel seemed successful in deflecting discussion of Prairie Island into the next IRP process The questioning then moved to timing. The PUC wondered whether the decision had to be made about a new plant in Becker in this particular integrated resource plan. The DOC argued that they wanted to ensure that Xcel had sufficient time to get regulatory approval and construct the plant in time for the second Sherco closing. DOC, in response to questions, pointed out that the risks of not giving Xcel enough time to prepare for the capacity shortfall in 2025 greatly outweighed the risks of having over capacity in 2025 with the new plant. They explained the risk of trying to find 750 mW of power in the open market. As the hearing wound towards a close, there was more discussion about how Xcel considered its workforce and planned retirements of jobs at Sherco I and Sherco II. Xcel testified that they had considered both economic development and tax base impacts in Becker. Xcel and the DOC pointed out that their analysis showed that closing the King plant was more expensive than closing the second Sherco plant. This higher cost precluded in-depth analysis of that option. The DOC said they would consider closing the King plant only if it had concerns about closing Sherco I (the second closing). The CEOs argued that it may end up being acceptable to build the combined cycle gas plant in Becker, but Xcel needed to spend more time considering renewables before the PUC should make a decision on that aspect of the plan. When (if) the decision options become available online, I will e-mail a link out to members. Thanks, and please let me know if you have any questions. --Carolyn Carolyn Jackson Senior Lobbyist Flaherty and Hood cciackson(@ffahertv-hood.com Office (651) 259-1928 Cell (612) 735-2627 Meeting with MPCA Deputy Commissioner David Thornton I met with MPCA Deputy Commissioner David Thornton and two members of his staff about Minnesota's plans for the Clean Power Plan and how it affects our communities. This discussion was triggered by the idea that carbon credits created under the Clean Power Plan could be used to compensate communities for the changes forced by this rule. We spent some time talking about how discussions MPCA had had so far about Clean Power Plan credits—how they would be allocated and how they could be traded. With the big change at the Federal administration, the MPCA has tabled discussions about how these credits would work. They laid out a few scenarios about what kinds of markets could be created for these credits and whether they would have much value. They indicated that the credits may not have much value. Then we turned to how changes in energy impact communities. They told me that the group of stakeholders who have been meeting to work on the Clean Power Plan will be having one last meeting to capture all of the planning they have done to date. That meeting, in February, will also address some of the discussions for the future. Given that a number of power plants may be changed or closing in the 2030s, the stakeholders may want to continue to meet to talk about issues surrounding those power plant closings. • Creation of clean energy jobs • Transitions for the energy work force • Impact on host communities • Replacements for the power grid when plants close • The greenhouse gas impact of energy choices in 2030 • The time it takes to plan for energy changes Commissioner Thornton closed by stating his belief that certainty is very important when planning changes to electric generation, and he acknowledged the complexity and need for long range planning. He expressed his goal to create a soft landing for those impacted by these changes. d J C �� — 5 4i 4- 0 d.1 Al L U m ; m N C6 O U ro O N LL L U ago L— ai c LU Ln J n v U -F-J O I, Ln U C oo--� co I U O . I 4-) X •U N mE O OJ Q � C6 L-� ate -+ � Com/fra 4-1 (6 E a� ON =3 bn OJ CJJ � n O � O ro =3O Jc:.0O N N `n U X C=L. N CD.. _ _ X0 X • cn 4-j [a Ln ci .1 cJ 0 OJ O M .7E — +_+ 4 -JE • - (a (U +j -�+ Q a) +� — U O � W > � Q O •— U 0 0 0 +-+ L X 4 ate-+ buo i p .— o L ttio .� 4-j o ago oc � o (IJ -I--+ U N V (� CO N °E cyo N 4- Ln cv -r-> > 4-1p •- •- U U U N 4J Q) i o �, ca o o E Q U U o U .J LL U U - U O 4-) U N U CL � U U O 4-1 +-j • — CU O N =3a) C.Up u, •�, 4-1E •� NE N p .�, C O cn 70 U O U Q U U •— O +-+ ai cn _ _0�--� Ln nu 4-j• � Q, W ,� N O U p ca •O . —' — 4-J� •� _� ca O X =3 N v w to aA a) Q) v W ci Am L 0 NO X ro C- 0 E .N U X LFj _O Q E 0) 0) •O Ln > O U 4-J V) U aA N V) UO 0 N un i i E a) Ln 1 O N 0 O OF, O 4-j ro U 0 O bn C6 � O Ln ca � N � 4A c6 r c6 ro >� U +- U f6 70 U M O 0 O L. CL i� 10 C6 � 4A O U C6 � •O Ln Ln•— Ul _0 O C3A Ln L .� Ln >MM C _0 +-j =3 u M"'ow C:O C:CMMM •— w m +.;a) -� CC: Z3 a) O a) C:> On •— a) N O ai > o a, •— 0 w _ .. Ln c c6 N ._QJ 0 0O N Q •— x +� aj � � 0 • • n O O U O i V) buoQ Q) 4A N — cn iri c6 C: ro Ln CA c6 0 +1 U U (6 N roC a� UO L . a� 0 (1) + Ln .— N Nro V) o C6 m m �c U _ o v cu ro O o .� Ln •� ru 4-J U Eru p ro L •� c— U U U U 4-J Ln 00 4-J Y O m O •— O Q O N C: N- N Ln i L- 0 O 4-- U �C O �a-J O O O '�' U.0 GJ 70 txo QJ, — N LL 4-J N O L. 4O LL 4-, c6 ca •— ca _r_ M O N U U U _N 0. •- i O v +-j Q) N 4-1 N J O D 70a� Oo (� a"' -I--i E 4- 4-1C6 c: E O t�A 4A O O - a--+ O O O •� •� 0 0 � 4—J .0 4-1 3 x •- � N x Ul LL C'�� (/) zr _ IIS 3 0 Cf c� N N 0 U 4-j 4- 1 buo U U O L MONTICELLO VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT Monticello, Minnesota 55362 2017 SECOND QUARTER REPORT OF THE MONTICELLO FIRE DEPARTMENT President - John Bauer Vice President - Matt Theisen Secretary - Neil Kranz Chief - Mike Mossey Captains - Jake Olinger Kurt Liefert Asst. Chief - Don Anderson Lieutenants - Scott Gearey Dustin Craig The following is the quarterly report of the Monticello Fire Department from April 1 through June 30, 2017. There were 81 calls which required 1478 man hours. The average attendance at a call was 15 men. The nature of the calls were as follows: Alarm — 22, Rescue — 10, Down Power Line — 9, Medical — 6, Grass — 4, Structure — 4, Natural Gas Leak — 3, Electrical — 2, Smoke in Building — 2, Gas Spill — 2, Tree — 2, Burning Brush — 1, Carport — 1, Fuel Oil Leak — 1, Missing Child — 1, Possible Structure — 1, Permit Burn — 1, Smell of Gas — 1, Smell of Smoke — 1, Transformer — 1, Vehicle — 1, and mutual aid was given four times to Big Lake and once to Clearwater. Mutual aid was received from Albertville and Buffalo twice each during the quarter and once from Maple Lake. During this quarter, we had 5 training sessions requiring 297 man hours. The average attendance per session was 27 men. We also had two special drills: Prescribed burn (prairie) which required 16 men for 93 man hours, and a trailer demo -kitchen (1 man, 5 man hours). Also, one man attended the Firefighter 1 &2/Hazmat courses (162 hours) and one man attended the Firefighter 2 course (27 hours). Agility Testing for the new hires was done which required 19 men for 37 man hours. During the quarter we had three work nights which involved an average of 26 men each for a total of 156 man hours. A fire investigation quarterly meeting was held which was attended by two men for four man hours. Activities/Public Relations for the quarter included: Fire prevention at Pumpkin Patch Preschool (3 men, 8 man hours). The department participating in Big Lake's Spud Fest parade in June (2 trucks carrying the Monticello Royalty candidates). The department was in attendance at: Benusa's Open House, and Moose Fest's 5K (6 men, 12 man hours). The department also held their annual Golf Tournament at the Monticello Country Club on June 4th. Sincerely, Neil B. Kranz Secretary Monticello Fire Department Breakdown of calls for April 1 through June 30, 2017. Monticello Citv: Alarm ..................... 17 Grass ..................... 0 Medical ..................... 5 Rescue ..................... 7 Structure .................. 3 Vehicle ..................... 0 Other ........................ 17 Monticello Township: Alarm..................... 3 Grass ..................... 3 Medical ..................... 0 Rescue ..................... 2 Structure .................. 1 Vehicle ..................... 1 Other ........................ 12 Silver Creek: Alarm ..................... 2 Grass ..................... 1 Medical ..................... 1 Rescue ..................... 1 Structure .................. 0 Vehicle ..................... 0 Other........................ 0 Total Calls = 81 Mutual Aid Received... 3 Mutual Aid Given ...... 5 Daytime Calls (6 a.m. to 6 p.m.) ........................... 62 Nighttime Calls (6 p.m. to 6 a.m.) ........................ 19