The URL can be used to link to this page

City Council Agenda Packet 09-25-2017AGENDA REGULAR MEETING — MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, September 25, 2017 — 6:30 p.m. Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING/WORKSHOP Academy Room — 4:45 p.m. 4:45 p.m. CLOSED/Joint Meeting — EDA/City Council — Purchase of Property 5:15 P.M. WWTP Management Update 5:30 p.m. Solar Discussion — Presentation by NRG Mayor: Brian Stumpf Council Members: Jim Davidson, Bill Fair, Charlotte Gabler, Lloyd Hilgart 1. General Business A. Call to Order & Pledge of Allegiance B. Approval of Meeting Minutes • Special Meeting Minutes from September 11, 2017 • Regular Meeting Minutes from September 11, 2017 C. Consideration of Adding Items to Agenda D. Citizen Comments E. Public Service Announcement • Fire Department Open House (9/30) • Library Community Meeting & Book Sale (9/30 and 10/2) • Bertram Athletic Fields BBQ (10/7) F. Council Liaison Updates • Library Board • EDA • MOAA • I-94 Coalition • Ellison House Committee G. Department Updates • City Administrator Update 2. Consent Agenda A. Consideration of approving payment of bills B. Consideration of approving new hires and departures for City departments C. Consideration of approving the sale/disposal of surplus city property D. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2017-65 accepting donations for Industry of the Year E. Consideration of approving a Credit Card Security Policy F. Consideration of approving Change Order No. 2 and adopting Resolution 2017-67 accepting improvements and authorizing final payment of $79,850.11 to DI -MAR Construction for the WWTF Phosphorous Reduction and Digester Cover Improvement Project, City Project No. 14C002 G. Consideration of Resolution 2017-68 declaring costs to be assessed, ordering preparation of assessment roll, and calling for an assessment hearing on October 23, 2017, to adopt assessment for 2017 Street Reconstruction and Utility Improvement Project, City Project 16C003, for Hart Boulevard and Sandberg Road H. Consideration of Resolution 2017-69 accepting improvement and authorizing final payment of $10,021.48 to Barber Construction for the Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park — Athletic Park Interim Improvements I. Consideration of adopting Ordinance 681 amending the Fee Schedule by adding Small Wireless Facility fee and collocation fees to Right -of -Way Permit section of Fee Schedule Consideration of approving an amendment to a Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development for Final Stage PUD Review of a multi -tenant commercial building in a B-3, Highway Business District. Applicant: Larson, Andy/Crown Bay K. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2017-66 awarding the sale of General Obligation Bonds, Series 2017A, in the original aggregate principal amount of $5,000,000; fixing their form and specifications; directing their execution and delivery; and providing for their payment L. Consideration of approving community solar garden subscription agreements with NRG 2A. Consideration of items removed from the consent agenda for discussion 3. Public Hearings 4. Regular Agenda A. Consideration of adopting Ordinance 682 by adding Title 8, Chapter 10 — Rights - of -Way Regulation and adopting Summary Ordinance 682A for publication B. Consideration of approving a request for Amendment to Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development, Development Stage Planned Unit Development, and Preliminary Plat for Carlisle Village 6th Addition for single family lots in an R-2 (Single Family and Two Family Residential) District. Applicant: Paxmar LLC C. Consideration of approving an amendment to the Monticello Comprehensive Plan by adopting the Downtown Small Area Plan. Applicant: City of Monticello 5. Added Items 6. Adjournment AGENDA CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL WORSHOP MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, September 11, 2017 — 4:45 p.m. Academy Room, MCC AGENDA 1. Call to Order 2. 4:45 p.m. CLOSED/Joint Meeting — EDA/City Council — A. Consider offers or counter-offers for the purchase of Real or Personal Property - Address: 103 Pine Street (155010052110, 155010052120, 155010052102) 3. 5:15 p.m. WWTP Management Update 4. 5:30 p.m. Solar Discussion — Presentation by NRG 5. Adjournment MINUTES SPECIAL MEETING — MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, September 11, 2017 — 5:15 p.m. Academy Room City Hall - Monticello Community Center Present: Brian Stumpf, Jim Davidson, Bill Fair, Charlotte Gabler, Lloyd Hilgart Absent: None Others: City staff. Jeff O'Neill, Wayne Oberg, Angela Schumann, Shibani Bisson, Rachel Leonard, Tom Moores, Sarah Rathlisberger, Tracy Ergen, Tom Pawelk, Matt Theisen, Ann Mosack, Jim Thares, John Rued, Dail Gilles, and Mike Mossey 1. Call to Order 4 Mayor Brian Stumpf called the special to order at m. 2. 2018 Budget Presentation and Revie Wayne Oberg, Finance Director, presented the fifth 20kbudget meet he budget presentation noted that the City Council will review the proposed 2018 p eliminary tax levy at the regular meeting following the special meeting. The presentation included information on tax base changes, tax capacity values and rates, and the debt service levy. Additional budget items were discussed by the City Council. A list of these items were presented and, if the City Council so chooses, can add these A the preliminary levy amount at the regular city council meeting. W The City Counci ussed the issue of providing garbage service to mobile home parks and townhomes at same rate as residential properties. This was not included in the preliminary levyamount and, if altered, would result in a decrease in revenue. There was also discussion about completing some projects from the downtown area study. Wayne Oberg noted that there are funds from 2017 that could possibly be allocated toward projects. Continued discussion willtake place at the regular city council meeting. 3. Adjournme t By consensusVSche'r' as adjourned at 6:15 p.m. Recorder: Jennif Approved: Attest: City Council Special Meeting Minutes—August 28, 2017 City Administrator REGULAR MEETING — MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, September 11, 2017 — 6:30 p.m. Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center Present: Brian Stumpf, Jim Davidson, Bill Fair, Charlotte Gabler, and Lloyd Hilgart Absent: None. 1. General Business A. Call to Order & Pledge of Allegiance Mayor Stumpf called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. All City Councilmembers were present. There was a moment of silence for 9/11 following the Pledge of Allegiance. AkhL B. Approval of Meeting Special Meeting Minul Councilmember Gabler moved approval of the special meetinj minutes. Councilmember Hilgart seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Regular Meting Minutes from August 28, 201 ALI-�o CouncilmembeirFair moved approval of theular meeting minutes as amended. Councilmember Davidson seconde the motion. Motion carried unanimously. M C. Consideration of Adding Items to the Agenda None. D. Citizen Comments Peg Becker, Veolia, addressed the City Council in regard to their proposed WWTF proposal. She mentioned that she is available for any questions. E. Public ServI Announcements • Pam Loidolt, Senior Center Director, commented on all of the activities taking place in regard to the Monticello Senior Center's 50th Anniversary Celebration. • Rachel Leonard, Communications Coordinator, presented the following announcements: - Blazin Thru Bertram — 9 a.m., Saturday, September 16, 2017. - Wag & Walk Festival — Sunday, September 24, 2017, 1-4 p.m., in Montipaws Park. City Council Minutes — September 11, 2017 Page 1 1 7 F. Council Liaison Updates • Highway 25 Coalition — Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator, noted that SRF provided an update on the Highway 25 Study, specifically identifying traffic patterns. • BCOL — Councilmember Fair commented that construction of the beach house has begun. • IEDC — Mayor Stumpf stated that there are prospects for economic development in the works. Jim Johnson resigned from the board and Mike Carr will be replacing him. • Planning Commission — Councilmember Gabler commented on the meeting and that there were two public hearings. The Downtown Small Area Plan was approved and the EDA's Housing Market Report was accepted. G. Department Updates "Jo • Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator, provided updates on the following: 1. Commented on the Coalition of Utility Cities and upcoming legislation. 2. The number of the fixtures for the pool lighting upgrades approved at the last meeting was incorrect. There are more fixtures than quoted and there will be an additional cost of $1,500, but no additional labor. 3. The Taste of the Town is ooT�Thursday, September 13, 2017. • Construction Update: Shibanin, City Engineer/WSB, provided an update which included the following: Mississi�*rive and Hart Boulevard were being paved on Monday; and the contractor is operating in liquidated damages which equals $500/day for each project. 2. Consent Agenda Councilmember Fair appro he Consent Agenda excluding item 211. Co cilmember Hilgart s ed the motion. Motion carried unanimously. A. nsideration of approvi e payment of bills. Recommendation: Approved d purchas�ar registers for a total amount of $1,511,201.72. B. Consideration of alproving new hires/departures. Recommendation: Approved hires for MCC and terminations for Parks, Streets, and MCC. C. Consideration of approving the sale/disposal of surplus city property. Recommendation: Approved as presented. D. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2017-51 accepting donations from CentraCare Health for the Powers of Produce kids program and from the Danno Mahoney family for a total of $300. Recommendation: Adopted Resolution 2017-51 approving the contribution and authorize use of funds as specified. City Council Minutes — September 11, 2017 Page 2 1 7 E. Consideration of setting the Truth -in -Taxation public hearing for 6:30 p.m. on December 11, 2017. Recommendation: Set the public hearing for the 2018 property tax levy and budget for December 11, 2017, at 6:30 p.m. F. Consideration of appointing a representative to the IEDC for a term to commence immediately and expire December 31, 2017. Recommendation: Approved the appointment of Mike Carr, Monticello School District, to the IEDC to a term ending on 12-31-2017. G. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2017-58 declaring costs to be assessed, ordering preparation of assessment roll and calling for an Assessment Hearing on October 9, 2017, to adopt assessments for the 2017 Street Reconstruction and Utility Improvement Project, City Project NO. 16C003, for Gillard Avenue, 95th Street, Haug Avenue, 90th Street and Mississippi Drive. Recommendation: Adopted Resolution 2017-58 declaring costs to be assessed, ordering, ordering preparation of assessment roll, and calling for the assessment hearing for October 9, 2017 Street Reconstruction and Utility Improvement Project, City Project No. 16C003 for Gillar venue, 95th Street, Haug Avenue, 90th Street d Mississippi Dr'v } 1 H. Consideration of approving a Final Stage lanned Unit Development for Self - Storage in a B-3 (Highway Business) District. Applicant: KB Properties, LLC. Recommen tion: ITEM WAS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGES � i I. Consideration of approving an Assignment of Wevelopment Agreement for Featherstone 3rd Addition from Gold Nugget Development to Novak -Fleck. Recommendation: Approved an assignment of the Development Contract for Featherstone Yd Addition from Gold Nugget Development to Novak -Fleck Incorporated. JConsideration of callin %�a public hearing on October 3, 2017, by the Monticello Planning Co sion for an amendment to Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development for Hi -Way Liquors sign height and area allowances. Recommendation: Called for a public hearing on October 3, 2017, by the Monticello Planning Commission for an amendment to Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development for Hi -Way Liquors sign. K. ADD-ON — Consideration of authorizing stormwater repairs on the river outlet at Maple Street at a cost of $13,650. Recommendation: Approved the authorization of stormwater repairs on the river outlet at Maple Street at a cost of $13,650. City Council Minutes — September 11, 2017 Page 3 1 7 2A. Consideration of items removed from the Consent Auenda for discussion. H. Consideration of approving a Final Stage Planned Unit Development, Rezoning to Planned Unit Development and Development Agreement for Self -Storage Facility in a B-3 (Highway Business) District. Applicant: KB Properties, LLC. Keith Burnham, KB Properties, LLC, addressed the City Council. He noted a couple of requested changes: Exhibit Z, #7 should state for Phase 1, not Phases I and 2; and Exhibit Z, #8 — he requested until September 15, 2018 to complete the entire fence. Mr. Burnham thanked city staff for all of their efforts. He also commented on the fact that the market for storage facilities shows there won't be a need for such facilities in the future, and perhaps the B-3 zoning, which allows self -storage, should be reevaluated. Angela Schumann, Community Development Director, responded and explained the B-3 zoning and the significant amount of land that is zoned B-3 in the city. Councilmember Hilgart expressed concern over the amount of property zoned B-3. Mayor Stumpf added that perhaps the Planning Commission should review the B-3 zoning and the property within the city. AL Angela Schumann reviewed changes were made to the De ment agreement. In addition, she noted that there was a summary ordin nce for publication that also requires city council approval. Councilmember Hilgart motioned to have the Planning Commission review the B-3 zoning in the city. Councilmember Gabler geconded the motion. Councilmember Fair moved approval of: Resolution 2017-65 approving a Final Stage PUD and Development AgreemenT, as amended — changes noted by Ms. Schumann, for KB Properties, Lot 11, Block 4, Groveland Addition, based on the findings in said resolution and contingent on compliance with the conditions listed in Exhibit Z, amended per applicant request, and staff comments on compliance; and Ordinance 680 rezoning to Planned Unit Development for Affordable Self -Storage PUD, Lot 11, Block 4, Groveland Addition; and Summary Ordinance 681A for publication. Councilmember Hilgart seconded he motion. Motion carried unanimously. 3. Public Heariis A. PUBLIC EARING — Consideration of adopting Resolution 2017-59 almrovin2 a vacation of drainage and utilitv easements for Lot 3, Block 17, Lot 1, Block 19, and Outlot A, Autumn Ridge Yd Addition. Angela Schumann gave a brief overview of the petition. The required drainage and utility easements are proposed with the plat of Autumn Ridge Villas. Mayor Stumpf opened the public hearing. No one testified. Mayor Stumpf closed the public hearing. City Council Minutes — September 11, 2017 Page 4 1 7 Councilmember Hilgart to approval of Resolution 2017-59, vacating drainage and utility easements over and across Autumn Ridge 3rd Addition as described in the petition, contingent on: approval of the plat of Autumn Ridge Villas for re-establishment of required drainage and utility easements; and verification that private utilities are within proposed drainage and utility easements for the plat of Autumn Ridge Villas. Councilmember Gabler seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. B. PUBLIC HEARING — Consideration of adopting Resolution 2017-60 approving the assessments for the TH 25/71h Street Intersectio Improvements. Citv Proiect No. 15C004. Shibani Bisson, City Engineer, presented the assessment roll and gave a presentation. The components of the project were stated, along with the proposed street reconstruction rate of $65 per front foot, which is based on assessing 50% of reconstruction cots for a collector roadway. Sidewalk assessment rates are proposed to be assessed at $13.50 per front foot, which includes 25% of the cost being assessed. Assessment is proposed at a #ar term at a 4 interest rate. Ms. Bisson noted that the city has received a lot of positive feedb ck from residents. The final project cost was $1,550,000 with $29,780 by funded by assessment and $160,220 by the,city. Remaining balance funded by MnDOT and State Aid funds. Mayor Stf opened the public hearing. No one testified. Mayor Stumpf closed the ptMic hearing. Councilmember Hilgart moved approval of solution 2017-60 approving an assessment roll to be certified for 2018 payable tax year for the TH 25/71 Street intersection improvements, City Project No. 15C004. Councilmember Davidson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. 4. lar Agenda A. Coilsideratio�c�optin2 solution 2017-61 approving a special benefit levv by the Citv of Montice to Economic Development Authoritv and accepting the EDA 2018 buds IT Angela S&umann presented the item and noted that the EDA has authorized to increase theitievy to the full statutory limit, which is an increase of $323,000 or 15.4% over the 2017 levy. Councilmember Gabler moved to adopt Resolution 2017-61 approving a special benefit levy by the City of Monticello Economic Development Authority and accepting the EDA 2018 budget. Councilmember Davidson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. City Council Minutes — September 11, 2017 Page 5 1 7 B. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2017-62 setting the 2018 Citv of Monticello's preliminary tax levv. Wayne Oberg, Finance Director, presented the preliminary 2018 property tax levy. Included in the presentation were: tax capacity rates; tax base changes; property tax levy history; and tax levy impact. The preliminary tax levy must be certified to Wright County by September 30, 2017. The City Council will adopt a final tax levy on December 11, 2017, which can be lower but not higher than the preliminary levy. The presented preliminary tax levy, less the HRA levy, is $9,547,000 which is an increase of 4.3% from 201; Discussion ensued among the City Council in regard to the increase in the tax levy. There was disagreement on whether there should be a higher preliminary levy approved in an effort to look more in depth at all of the additional budget requests. These items would then possibly be included or not included in the final budget. Mayor Stumpf questioned whether charging garbage service for mobile home parks/townhomes the same as residential is included in the budget. Mr. Oberg noted that no changes were made to the proposed levy to address this issue, and $72,000 would need to be added to the budget to cover the lost garbage revenue from these entities. There was also some discussion on leftover 2017. These funds, approximately $300,000, could potentially be used for some of the additional budget requests. , Councilmember Fair moved to authorize a preliminary tax levy of $9,800,000. Motion dies for a lack of a second. Councilmember Gabler moved to authorize a preliminary tax levy of $9,772,000. Councilmember Fair seconded the motion. Motion failed 2-3; Councilmembers Davidson, Hilgart and Stumpf voted against. Councilmember Hilgart moved to adopt Resolution 2017-62 setting the 2018 preliminary tax levy at $9,547,000 including the stipulation that the excess 2017 funds be used for downtown area projects. Councilmember Fair seconded the motion. Motion carried 3-2: Councilmember abler and Mayor Stumpf voted against. NM C. Consideration of -proving a rezoning to PUD, Final State Planned Unit Development, Final Plat and Development Agreement for Autumn Ridge Villas for detached single familv lots in an R-3 (Medium Densitv Residential) District at Autumn Ridge 3rd Addition. Applicant: SW Wold Construction/Ocello, LLC. Angela Schumann presented the item and noted that a summary ordinance for publication was added for approval. The current proposal is for a PUD Final Stage review. Councilmember Gabler moved approval of Decision 1– adopt Resolution 2017-63 approving a Final Stage PUD for Autumn Ridge Villas, subject to conditions in Exhibit Z and based on findings in said resolution. Councilmember Davidson seconded the motion. Motion carried City Council Minutes — September 11, 2017 Page 6 1 7 unanimously. Councilmember Gabler moved approval of Decision 2 — adopt Ordinance 679 for rezoning from R-3 to Autumn Ridge Villas PUD, based on findings in Resolution 2017-63. Councilmember Fair seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Councilmember Gabler moved approval of Decision 3 — adopt Resolution 2017-64 for approval of Final Plat of Autumn Ridge Villas, based on the findings noted in the resolution and subject to the conditions in Exhibit Z. Councilmember Davidson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Councilmember Gabler moved approval of Decision 4 — to approve Summary Ordinance 679A for publication. Councilmember Fair seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. 5. Added Items Councilmember Gabler motioned to have staff review the garbage pick-up policy, including residential, commercial, mobile homes, etc. Councilmember Fair seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. 6. Adiournment By consensus, the meeting was adjourned at 7:40 p.m. Recorder: Jennifer Schreiber Approved: Attest: City Administrator City Council Minutes — September 11, 2017 Page 7 17 City Council Agenda 09/25/2017 2A. Consideration of avvrovin2 pavment of bills (WO) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: City staff submits the attached bill registers and purchasing card registers for approval by Council. The bill registers contain all invoices processed and the purchasing card registers contain all card purchases made since the last Council meeting. Subject to MN Statutes, most invoices require Council approval prior to releasing checks for payment. The day following Council approval, payments will be released unless directed otherwise. A credit purchasing agreement and policy was approved by Council initially and card purchases must comply with the policy. If Council has no questions or comments on the bill and purchase card registers, these can be approved with the consent agenda. If requested, this item can be removed from consent and discussed prior to making a motion for approval. Al. Budget Impact: None A2. Staff Workload Impact: No additional work required B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the bill and purchase card registers for a total amount of $1,184,368.52. 2. Motion to approve the registers with changes directed by Council. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends Alternative #1 or #2, per direction of Council. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • Bill registers and Purchase Card registers Accounts Payable Computer Check Proof List by Vendor User: Julie.Cheney Printed: 09/12/2017 - 11:27AM Batch: 00201.09.2017 - 201.09.2017 US Bank Moiiii6effo Y Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Vendor: 4445 MARCIA JOHNSON Check Sequence: 1 ACH Enabled: False 050416 FNM -001-0086 Final Credit - Applied to UB Ac 8.33 05/10/2016 656-00000-115025 Check Total: 8.33 Vendor: UB*00262 MATT & NICHOLE LANGANKI Check Sequence: 2 ACH Enabled: False Refund Check - Applied to UB Acct 20.45 11/24/2015 601-00000-202010 Check Total: 20.45 Vendor: 3241 LINCOLN FINANCIAL GROUP Check Sequence: 3 ACH Enabled: True 9/1/2017 Sept 2017 1,744.43 09/15/2017 101-00000-217066 Check Total: 1,744.43 Vendor: UB*00406 Michael & Kelli McGill Check Sequence: 4 ACH Enabled: False Refund Check - Applied to UB Acct 45.24 05/12/2017 601-00000-202010 Check Total: 45.24 Vendor: 1593 MN DEPT OF REVENUE - ACH Check Sequence: 5 ACH Enabled: True August August Sales Tax - General 52.69 09/15/2017 101-00000-208100 August August Sales Tax - General 0.31 09/15/2017 101-41310-443990 August August Waste Tax - General 713.44 09/15/2017 101-00000-208120 August August Waste Tax - General 0.56 09/15/2017 101-43230-443990 August August Sales Tax - MCC 5,697.07 09/15/2017 226-00000-208100 August August Sales Tax - MCC -0.07 09/15/2017 226-45122-362900 August August Sales Tax - Water Fund 4,190.28 09/15/2017 601-00000-208100 August August Sales Tax - Water Fund 0.72 09/15/2017 601-49440-443990 August August Sales Tax - Hi Way Liquor 45,604.93 09/15/2017 609-00000-208100 August August Sales Tax - Hi Way Liquor 0.07 09/15/2017 609-49750-443990 August August Use Tax - Hi Way Liquor 17.00 09/15/2017 609-49754-421990 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (09/12/2017 - 11:27 AM) Page 1 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: True AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (09/12/2017 - 11:27 AM) Page 2 Check Total: 56,277.00 Vendor: 4732 MONEY MOVERS, INC. Check Sequence: 6 103179 Money Movers - Fitness Rewards - August 2017 53.00 09/15/2017 226-45122-430900 Check Total: 53.00 Vendor: 1426 CITY OF MONTICELLO Check Sequence: 7 UB Aug 2017 5002 - 1510 Hart Blvd sprinkler 90.94 09/15/2017 101-43120-438200 UB Aug 2017 5003- 1460 Hart Blvd sprinkler 83.12 09/15/2017 101-43120-438200 UB Aug 2017 5004- 1390 Hart Blvd sprinkler 6.27 09/15/2017 101-43120-438200 UB Aug 2017 5005- 822 Hart Blvd sprinkler 197.25 09/15/2017 101-43120-438200 UB Aug 2017 5026- Ellison Park 875.54 09/15/2017 101-45201-438200 UB Aug 2017 5248 - Bridge Park E. sprinkler 470.83 09/15/2017 101-45201-438200 UB Aug 2017 5249 - Bridge Park W sprinkler 148.78 09/15/2017 101-45201-438200 UB Aug 2017 5250 - Bridge Park W 55.21 09/15/2017 101-45201-438200 UB Aug 2017 5569 -Freeway Park sprinkler 1,224.35 09/15/2017 101-45201-438200 UB Aug 2017 5637 - Dog Park 5.45 09/15/2017 101-45201-438200 UB Aug 2017 7224 - WWTP 1,707.74 09/15/2017 602-49480-438200 UB Aug 2017 7441 - 200 W Broadway sprinkler 16.21 09/15/2017 101-43120-438200 UB Aug 2017 7885 - Help Center 17.24 09/15/2017 217-41990-438200 UB Aug 2017 8086 - 4th St. Warming House 13.66 09/15/2017 101-45201-438200 UB Aug 2017 8114- Hi -Way Liquor 185.13 09/15/2017 609-49754-438200 UB Aug 2017 8117 -MCC 1,323.82 09/15/2017 226-45126-438200 UB Aug 2017 8119 -Fire Station 88.06 09/15/2017 101-42200-438200 UB Aug 2017 8120 - Building Inspection Garage 13.66 09/15/2017 101-41940-438200 UB Aug 2017 8177 - Library 287.02 09/15/2017 101-45501-438200 UB Aug 2017 8394- Riverside Cemetery 13.54 09/15/2017 651-49010-438200 UB Aug 2017 8488- Hillcrest Park 308.24 09/15/2017 101-45201-438200 UB Aug 2017 8528- Monti NSP Softball Field 1,968.33 09/15/2017 101-45203-438200 UB Aug 2017 8533 - Chelsea Rd Lift Station 186.30 09/15/2017 602-49490-438200 UB Aug 2017 8621 - Ferning Round a bout 18.28 09/15/2017 101-43120-438200 UB Aug 2017 8622 - Pioneer Park bathroom 27.88 09/15/2017 101-45201-438200 UB Aug 2017 8631 - 203 Chelsea Rd- Animal Shelter 117.00 09/15/2017 101-42700-438200 UB Aug 2017 8674 - Reservoir- 207 Chelsea Rd sprinkler 173.80 09/15/2017 601-49440-438200 UB Aug 2017 8903 - PW Shop/Clerical 245.19 09/15/2017 101-43127-438200 UB Aug 2017 8904 - PW Vehical Storage 11.24 09/15/2017 101-43127-438200 UB Aug 2017 8905 - PW Office 245.34 09/15/2017 101-43127-438200 UB Aug 2017 10063 - Front St. Park sprinkler 45.71 09/15/2017 101-45201-438200 UB Aug 2017 10128 - 118 6th St. West 13.66 09/15/2017 101-41941-438200 UB Aug 2017 10267 - Community Garden 21.29 09/15/2017 226-45127-438200 UB Aug 2017 13953 - SPR Hwy 25/SE Broadway -100 E. Bro: 34.70 09/15/2017 101-43120-438200 Reference ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: True AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (09/12/2017 - 11:27 AM) Page 2 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number UB Aug 2017 14476 - Ellison House 14.16 09/15/2017 101-45201-438200 UB Aug 2017 14522 - Hillside Cemetery sprinkler 195.68 09/15/2017 101-45201-438200 Check Total: 10,450.62 Vendor: 2811 US BANK CORPORATE PMT SYSTEM Check Sequence: 8 09/06/2017 Monti Napa - spark plug 3.96 09/15/2017 601-49440-422100 09/06/2017 Grady's -(4) brass plated posts 4.40 09/15/2017 101-45201-421650 09/06/2017 Grady's - trim roller refills 2pk 5.99 09/15/2017 101-43120-421990 09/06/2017 Cub - (12) lemons 6.00 09/15/2017 609-49750-425500 09/06/2017 Home Depot - connector 2pk; (2) rdc bushing 7.68 09/15/2017 601-49440-421990 09/06/2017 Runnings - 25pk ear plugs 7.99 09/15/2017 101-42200-421990 09/06/2017 Home Depot - boiler drain; gal nipple; seal tape 8.61 09/15/2017 101-45201-421650 09/06/2017 Runnings - drawer liner 13.99 09/15/2017 601-49440-421990 09/06/2017 Monti Napa - (4) oil filters 16.28 09/15/2017 101-43127-422120 09/06/2017 Fastenal -outer nut; shaft lock assy; etc 18.26 09/15/2017 101-45201-421650 09/06/2017 Monti Napa - shop supply- PTEX THRD 18.99 09/15/2017 101-43127-421990 09/06/2017 Sherwin Williams - gal. white 24.79 09/15/2017 101-45201-421650 09/06/2017 Grady's - variety sizes (113) Washers 29.02 09/15/2017 101-45201-421650 09/06/2017 Allina Health- rand. drug test- R.H. 30.00 09/15/2017 101-43120-431990 09/06/2017 Grady's - 2 gal garden sprayer; 1 gal. sprayer 32.98 09/15/2017 101-45201-421650 09/06/2017 Parks & Trails of MN- renew membership 10/7/: 35.00 09/15/2017 101-45201-443300 09/06/2017 Home Depot - ZPARKS-ELLPRK- (8) 2x4 12' si 43.68 09/15/2017 229-45202-453010 09/06/2017 Home Depot -10' Gal. Pipe; (2) gal elbow 48.92 09/15/2017 601-49440-421990 09/06/2017 Grady's - (3) asst. kneepads 51.97 09/15/2017 101-43120-421990 09/06/2017 G & K - mat srvc- Inv #6043835267 55.71 09/15/2017 609-49754-431990 09/06/2017 Sherwin Williams - slimline battery 63.01 09/15/2017 101-45201-421650 09/06/2017 Cub - (112) limes; (12) lemons 66.00 09/15/2017 609-49750-425500 09/06/2017 Hirshfield's - gal green; 2pk foam; tape; etc 72.68 09/15/2017 101-45201-421650 09/06/2017 DSG - parts-replumb Hi -Way Liquor sprinkler 85.17 09/15/2017 601-49440-421990 09/06/2017 Fleet Farm- Generator battery- Meadow Oak Lif 92.69 09/15/2017 602-49490-422100 09/06/2017 Monti Napa - (2) power locks; coupler; etc 94.28 09/15/2017 101-45201-421650 09/06/2017 Runnings - carry case; chain 94.94 09/15/2017 101-42200-421990 09/06/2017 Grady's -ratchet; (2) locking plier; vice; etc 97.30 09/15/2017 101-45201-421650 09/06/2017 Cutter Sales - (2) bearing insert; (2) flange 98.66 09/15/2017 101-43120-422100 09/06/2017 Upolstry Plus - #103 repair 100.00 09/15/2017 101-43120-422100 09/06/2017 Royal Tire - #216 Cushman (2) Carl SP Trail 129.98 09/15/2017 101-45201-422100 09/06/2017 Big Lake Lumber - (10) 16' Abitibi Smoot 143.50 09/15/2017 101-43120-422400 09/06/2017 Big Lake Lumber - ZPARKS-ELLPRK-mixc tris 69.12 09/15/2017 229-45202-453010 09/06/2017 Monti Napa -brake pads; brake rotor- 1/2 95.72 09/15/2017 601-49440-422110 09/06/2017 Monti Napa -brake pads; brake rotor- 1/2 95.72 09/15/2017 602-49490-422110 09/06/2017 Home Depot - (40) 24" steel stake; (20) 18"stake 221.80 09/15/2017 101-43127-421990 09/06/2017 General Rental - excavator; trailer; bucket- Ceda 225.00 09/15/2017 101-43120-441500 Reference ACH Enabled: True AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (09/12/2017 - 11:27 AM) Page 3 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 09/06/2017 NBP - (4) receipt tape 232.99 09/15/2017 609-49754-421990 09/06/2017 Runnings - (4) Binder Chain;(3) Lever; (2) hook 278.71 09/15/2017 101-45201-421650 09/06/2017 Allina Health- Philips OnSite AED 400.00 09/15/2017 101-42200-421990 09/06/2017 Dacota Paper - (4) can liner; (20) nit. gloves; eye 404.34 09/15/2017 101-45201-421650 09/06/2017 Runnings - chain saw; pro cutters; carbide; etc 463.52 09/15/2017 101-42200-421990 09/06/2017 Arctic Glacier- resale inv. #1955721609; #2190( 497.00 09/15/2017 609-49750-425500 09/06/2017 Arctic Glacier- resale inv. #11955721207; #7205 519.79 09/15/2017 609-49750-425500 09/06/2017 General Rental - lighted towable #5; #4; #3; 487.50 09/15/2017 101-43120-441500 09/06/2017 General Rental --ZPARKS-ELLPRK-concrete pi 70.00 09/15/2017 229-45202-453010 09/06/2017 TowMaster- shaft & sprockets sander STCC; sha 837.49 09/15/2017 101-43120-422100 09/06/2017 John's Welding -Harold Pittman memorial bench 955.00 09/15/2017 101-45201-421650 09/06/2017 John's Welding- Jim Holt memorial bench 955.00 09/15/2017 101-45201-421650 09/06/2017 True Brands- resal- bottle openers; gift bags; etc 993.53 09/15/2017 609-49750-425400 09/06/2017 Allina Health- 3rd quarter- to keep Medical up tc 1,173.42 09/15/2017 101-42200-431990 09/06/2017 Ess Bros. - cross walk- (12) Truncated Domes as 1,285.00 09/15/2017 101-43120-422410 09/06/2017 Central Wood Prod- (100) 2203 Rec-Step Cert. F 1,604.95 09/15/2017 101-45201-422500 09/06/2017 Lano - Seeder - Landpride All Purpose 6,704.88 09/15/2017 101-45201-424100 09/06/2017 Runnings -mounted rubber tractor light 14.99 09/15/2017 602-49490-422110 09/06/2017 Hirshfield's - gal Pebble Mosaic; tray liner 43.95 09/15/2017 101-45201-421650 09/06/2017 DISH - Sept. 2017 service - Hi -Way Liqor 64.16 09/15/2017 609-49754-432500 09/06/2017 Streicher's - perimeter light; flashlight: DC charg 189.99 09/15/2017 101-42200-421990 09/06/2017 Streicher's - shirt 73.99 09/15/2017 101-42200-421120 09/06/2017 Arctic Glacier- resale inv. #1955722607; #23001) 474.89 09/15/2017 609-49750-425500 09/06/2017 Zee Med- sunscreen; bug repel; bandages; etc- P 266.90 09/15/2017 101-45201-420650 09/06/2017 Zee Med- eyedrops; wound seal; burnjel; etc -PV 130.00 09/15/2017 601-49440-420650 09/06/2017 Zee Med- burnjel; woundseal; bandage; etc- Sho 202.10 09/15/2017 101-43127-420650 09/06/2017 Zee Med- anitbiotic oint; bandages; etc- Hi -Way 44.47 09/15/2017 609-49754-421990 09/06/2017 Midwest Landscape- Hwy 25/Brdwy- (2) Maple: 734.05 09/15/2017 101-46102-422500 09/06/2017 WHCE - 6/16-7/15/2017 maintc. contracts 1,964.05 09/15/2017 101-43160-431900 09/06/2017 Amazon - File Folders 99.48 09/15/2017 226-45122-421990 09/06/2017 Amazon - Wireless Trackball Mouse 32.00 09/15/2017 101-41520-421990 09/06/2017 Walmart - Protein Bars & Oranges for Concessic 33.10 09/15/2017 226-45125-425410 09/06/2017 Walmart - Cupcakes 5.58 09/15/2017 226-45127-421460 09/06/2017 Walmart - Summer of Safety Prizes - Gift Cards 219.63 09/15/2017 101-41800-421990 09/06/2017 Walmart - Employee Picnic Supplies: Condimen 118.15 09/15/2017 101-41800-443990 09/06/2017 Walmart - Bananas for Concession 1.23 09/15/2017 226-45125-425410 09/06/2017 Walmart - Measuring Cups for Chemicals; Cloro 12.49 09/15/2017 226-45122-421990 09/06/2017 Walmart - Totes & Crayons for Childcare Area 15.76 09/15/2017 226-45127-421730 09/06/2017 Amazon - Toner Cartridge 68.87 09/15/2017 101-41800-421990 09/06/2017 Amazon - Ankle Cuffs (3), Tricep Rope 29.99 09/15/2017 226-45126-422990 09/06/2017 Amazon - Wireless Mouse, Coffee, Wall Mount : 159.73 09/15/2017 101-41310-421990 09/06/2017 Amazon - Sit/Stand Vari Desk (DC) 395.00 09/15/2017 101-42400-421990 09/06/2017 Amazon - Sit/Stand Vari Desk (VL) 495.00 09/15/2017 101-41310-421990 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (09/12/2017 - 11:27 AM) Page 4 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 09/06/2017 Amazon - Replacement Swivels & Carabiners (2 137.26 09/15/2017 226-45126-421990 09/06/2017 Grady's - Basketball Net (1) 6.99 09/15/2017 226-45126-421990 09/06/2017 Grady's - Gear Puller, Door Stops (4) 16.55 09/15/2017 226-45126-422990 09/06/2017 MN Dept Labor - Limited Building Offical Licei 35.00 09/15/2017 101-42400-443700 09/06/2017 MN Dept Labor - Annual Elevator Operating - E 100.00 09/15/2017 101-41941-431990 09/06/2017 Verizon - June 21 - July 20 26.02 09/15/2017 101-43120-432100 09/06/2017 Verizon - June 21 - July 20 140.04 09/15/2017 101-42200-432100 09/06/2017 Verizon - June 11 - July 10 25.02 09/15/2017 101-42400-432100 09/06/2017 Dacotah Paper - Bathroom & Locker Room Supl 998.09 09/15/2017 226-45126-421990 09/06/2017 Monti Vacuum Center - Bag & Filter 21.95 09/15/2017 101-45501-421990 09/06/2017 Monti Vacuum Center - Bag & Filter 23.95 09/15/2017 101-41941-421990 09/06/2017 Monti Vacuum Center - Bag, Filter, Plate, Brush 106.75 09/15/2017 226-45126-421990 09/06/2017 Monti Vacuum Center - Cord 79.90 09/15/2017 226-45126-422990 09/06/2017 Northridge 4 x 4 - Fraud Credit -517.75 09/15/2017 226-00000-115030 09/06/2017 Wall Street Journal - Monthly Subscription 36.99 09/15/2017 101-41520-443300 09/06/2017 NBP - Rubber Bands, Paper, Post Its, Dry Erase 216.52 09/15/2017 101-41310-421990 09/06/2017 NBP - Plastic Knives, Paper, File Folders 112.20 09/15/2017 101-41310-421990 09/06/2017 NBP - Paper 77.49 09/15/2017 226-45122-421990 09/06/2017 Von Hansons Meats - Employee Picnic Food: Bu 322.83 09/15/2017 101-41800-443990 09/06/2017 Von Hanson Meats - Employee Picnic Food: Cc 191.27 09/15/2017 101-41800-443990 09/06/2017 Von Hanson Meats - Employee Recognition Gil 225.00 09/15/2017 101-41800-443990 09/06/2017 Domino's Pizza - Meal for Council Workshop M 55.55 09/15/2017 101-41110-431990 09/06/2017 Franklin Outdoor Signs - Gym Banner 70.00 09/15/2017 226-45125-431990 09/06/2017 City of Minneapolis - Monti Pawn Transactions ] 189.90 09/15/2017 101-42100-431990 09/06/2017 City of Minneapolis - Monti Pawn Transactions. 159.30 09/15/2017 101-42100-431990 09/06/2017 Fleet Farm - Padlock 17.99 09/15/2017 101-45501-421990 09/06/2017 Fleet Farm - Wall Fountain & Extension Cord 122.30 09/15/2017 226-45126-421990 09/06/2017 Holiday - Unleaded Fuel 9.541 gals @ $2.299 21.93 09/15/2017 217-41990-421200 09/06/2017 Holiday - Unleaded Fuel 10.102 gals @ $2.319 23.43 09/15/2017 217-41990-421200 09/06/2017 Target - Food for EDA Meeting 31.57 09/15/2017 213-46301-443990 09/06/2017 Mail Finance - Postage Machine Lease Payment 564.33 09/15/2017 101-41310-441500 09/06/2017 G & K - Uniforms, Towels, Mops (2 Invoices) 101.94 09/15/2017 226-45126-421990 09/06/2017 Randy's Sanitation - Shredding Services (DMV) 17.51 09/15/2017 217-41990-431990 09/06/2017 Randy's Sanitation - Shredding Services (CH) 17.51 09/15/2017 101-41310-431990 09/06/2017 Monti Chamber - August Lunch (RL) 15.00 09/15/2017 101-41310-443990 09/06/2017 River City Extreme - F.I. Field Trip 345.00 09/15/2017 226-45127-431991 09/06/2017 Home Depot - Pressure Washer 199.00 09/15/2017 226-45126-422990 09/06/2017 Super America - Unleaded Fuel - 8.936 gals @ $ 20.54 09/15/2017 217-41990-421200 09/06/2017 Paypal - NICHA Fall Conference Registration 60.00 09/15/2017 226-45122-433100 09/06/2017 Paypal - NICHA Fall Conf Registration for Two 120.00 09/15/2017 226-00000-115030 09/06/2017 Dacotah Paper - Bathroom & Locker Room Supl 876.64 09/15/2017 226-45126-421990 09/06/2017 Dacotah Paper - Concession Supplies 143.48 09/15/2017 226-45125-421990 09/06/2017 Dacotah Paper - Bathroom Supplies 279.78 09/15/2017 101-45501-421990 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (09/12/2017 - 11:27 AM) Page 5 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 09/06/2017 G & K - Uniforms, Towels, Mops (4 Invoices) 194.56 09/15/2017 226-45126-421990 09/06/2017 Amazon - Cable Ties, Coffee, Packaging Tape 86.03 09/15/2017 101-41310-421990 09/06/2017 Amazon - Scanner for Tricia's Office 79.99 09/15/2017 226-45122-421990 09/06/2017 Verizon - July 4 - August 3 50.74 09/15/2017 101-42400-432100 09/06/2017 Verizon - July 4 - August 3 31.29 09/15/2017 226-45122-432100 09/06/2017 Verizon - July 4 - August 3 104.87 09/15/2017 101-43120-432100 09/06/2017 Verizon - July 4 - August 3 46.02 09/15/2017 601-49440-432100 09/06/2017 Verizon - July 4 - August 3 46.01 09/15/2017 602-49490-432100 09/06/2017 Sherwin Williams - Spackling Paste, Liner, Supf 76.34 09/15/2017 226-45126-422990 09/06/2017 Home Depot - Lumber for Bench in Main Entrar 43.11 09/15/2017 226-45126-422990 09/06/2017 MN APA - Conference 9/27 - 9/29/17 AS 310.00 09/15/2017 101-41910-433100 09/06/2017 Grady's - (2) RSTP Safety Spray 6.00 09/15/2017 101-43120-421510 09/06/2017 Grady's - Utility brush- light globe cleaning 7.59 09/15/2017 101-43127-421100 09/06/2017 Grady's - boiler drain 8.99 09/15/2017 101-45201-421650 09/06/2017 General Rental - ZPARKS-ELLPRK- (4) castors 9.88 09/15/2017 229-45202-453010 09/06/2017 Fastenal - wood handle; (4) gloves 11.85 09/15/2017 101-45201-421650 09/06/2017 Grady's -Comm. Garden- (2) cplr hose shut off, 14.97 09/15/2017 101-45201-421650 09/06/2017 Runnings - (3) chain saw sharpening 15.00 09/15/2017 101-43127-421990 09/06/2017 Auto Value - RV Blade to 6 pole 16.99 09/15/2017 101-45201-421650 09/06/2017 Streicher's - battery for hand held flashlight - Fin 19.99 09/15/2017 101-42200-421990 09/06/2017 Grady's -10 gal garbage can 24.99 09/15/2017 101-43120-421990 09/06/2017 Home Depot - (2) shop vac filter; Powerade- Fin 39.22 09/15/2017 101-42200-421990 09/06/2017 Hirshfield's - ZPARKS-RWOODS- 1 gal. green 1 47.74 09/15/2017 229-45202-453010 09/06/2017 Nighthawk Security - Sept.2017 monitor/cellular 49.95 09/15/2017 101-42200-431900 09/06/2017 Amazon -5pk collapsible cones; 12pk safety glae 131.14 09/15/2017 101-42200-421990 09/06/2017 Dyna - shop supplies- washers; nuts; cable ties; f 230.72 09/15/2017 101-43127-421500 09/06/2017 Applied Mntc. (2) 12pk aero paint 242.03 09/15/2017 101-43127-421510 09/06/2017 DSG- ZPARKS-RWOODS- 110' PVC Pipe 10; i 262.92 09/15/2017 229-45202-453010 09/06/2017 Monti Vacuum Center - repair 1 motor 299.95 09/15/2017 101-43127-440440 09/06/2017 Runnings -(3) binder chain; (2) ratchet; (2) binde 322.93 09/15/2017 101-43127-421990 09/06/2017 Fleet Farm - Harrow- Multi -Use Tine 449.99 09/15/2017 101-45201-421650 09/06/2017 Emergency Response Sol- SCBA hose assy- 2nd 500.00 09/15/2017 101-42200-440440 09/06/2017 Auto Value - #206 gas cap 12.99 09/15/2017 101-45201-422110 09/06/2017 Home Depot -IOpk light bulb for Fire Station 21.97 09/15/2017 101-42200-421990 09/06/2017 Fastenal - (10) Silver Bearing- playground 25.28 09/15/2017 101-45201-421650 09/06/2017 Fastenal -YMCA - supplies- nuts; galv. Med. Sp] 35.64 09/15/2017 101-45201-421650 09/06/2017 Paypal-MN Fall Maint. Expo 10/4&5 - Chad 150.00 09/15/2017 101-45201-433100 09/06/2017 Grady's - Basketball Nets (4), Spray Paint (2), N 52.95 09/15/2017 226-45126-422990 09/06/2017 Grady's - Washers (2) 1.50 09/15/2017 226-45126-422990 09/06/2017 Sherwin Williams - Paint, Drop Cloth, Paint Tra; 227.15 09/15/2017 226-45126-422990 09/06/2017 Target - Food for Special Council Meeting 8/28/ 39.99 09/15/2017 101-41110-443990 09/06/2017 Super America - Unleaded Fuel - 9.384 gals @ $ 22.23 09/15/2017 217-41990-421200 09/06/2017 MN APA - Conference 9/27 - 9/29/17 JaT 330.00 09/15/2017 101-41910-433100 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (09/12/2017 - 11:27 AM) Page 6 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 09/06/2017 Advanced Disposal - July 2017 - Recycling 12,844.10 09/15/2017 101-43230-438400 09/06/2017 Advanced Disposal - July 2017 38,632.41 09/15/2017 101-43230-438400 09/06/2017 Advanced Disposal - July 2017 35.80 09/15/2017 101-43127-438400 09/06/2017 Advanced Disposal - July 2017 47.74 09/15/2017 101-45201-438400 09/06/2017 Advanced Disposal - July 2017 23.87 09/15/2017 101-45201-438400 09/06/2017 Advanced Disposal - July 2017 113.38 09/15/2017 602-49480-438400 09/06/2017 Advanced Disposal - July 2017 208.87 09/15/2017 226-45126-438400 09/06/2017 Advanced Disposal - July 2017 11.93 09/15/2017 101-45501-431990 09/06/2017 Advanced Disposal - July 2017 23.87 09/15/2017 609-49754-438400 09/06/2017 Advanced Disposal - July 2017 23.87 09/15/2017 101-45201-438400 09/06/2017 Cub - (25) limes; (10) lemons 13.34 09/15/2017 609-49750-425500 09/06/2017 Martie's - (6) Round Up 113.69 09/15/2017 101-43120-422500 09/06/2017 Breezy Point- (2) nights 9/21 & 22- MN Cemete 144.96 09/15/2017 101-45201-433100 09/06/2017 Paypal-MN Fall Maint. Expo 10/4 &5 - PW 200.00 09/15/2017 101-43120-433100 09/06/2017 Big Lake Lumber -ZPARKS-ELLPRK- (4) profi 500.00 09/15/2017 229-45202-453010 09/06/2017 WHCE - Sunset Ponds 7/1-8/1/17 (280) kWh 52.86 09/15/2017 602-49490-438100 09/06/2017 WHCE - 1645 & 1675 CR 39 59.23 09/15/2017 602-49490-438100 09/06/2017 WHCE - DMV 19.95 09/15/2017 217-41990-431900 09/06/2017 WHCE - 2171 W River St- Parks 36.45 09/15/2017 101-45201-431900 09/06/2017 WHCE - 5980 Jason Ave NE - Water 19.95 09/15/2017 601-49440-431900 09/06/2017 WHCE - MCC 27.95 09/15/2017 226-45126-431900 09/06/2017 WHCE - 207 Chelsea Rd - Water 32.95 09/15/2017 601-49440-431900 09/06/2017 WHCE - 209 Cedar St - Water 29.95 09/15/2017 601-49440-431900 09/06/2017 WHCE - 132 E Broadway - Water 29.95 09/15/2017 601-49440-431900 09/06/2017 WHCE - 107 River St - Parks 19.95 09/15/2017 101-45201-431900 09/06/2017 WHCE - Sept 2017 service- Hi -Way Liquor 21.32 09/15/2017 609-49754-431900 09/06/2017 WHCE - Sept 2017 service- MCC 19.95 09/15/2017 226-45126-431900 09/06/2017 WHCE - Sept 2017 service- 200 Dundas - Water 29.95 09/15/2017 601-49440-431900 09/06/2017 WHCE - Sept 2017 service- 909 Golf Crs. Rd 19.95 09/15/2017 101-43110-431900 09/06/2017 WHCE - Sept 2017 General Street Lighting 1,334.00 09/15/2017 101-43160-438100 09/06/2017 Grady's -Bolts for Pool Door (13) 4.75 09/15/2017 226-45126-422990 09/06/2017 Grady's - Hardware for Pool Door, Battery for F 16.44 09/15/2017 226-45126-422990 09/06/2017 Home Depot - 48" Straight Edge 7.97 09/15/2017 226-45126-422990 09/06/2017 Home Depot - Measuring Wheel 31.97 09/15/2017 226-45126-422990 09/06/2017 NBP - Paper 32.99 09/15/2017 217-41990-421990 09/06/2017 NBP - Calendars, Paper 177.04 09/15/2017 226-45122-421990 09/06/2017 NBP - Paper, Forks, Napkins 263.92 09/15/2017 101-41310-421990 09/06/2017 Monti Chamber - August Lunch (JT) 15.00 09/15/2017 213-46301-443990 09/06/2017 Monti Chamber - August Lunch (AM) 15.00 09/15/2017 226-45122-443990 09/06/2017 UHL - Boiler EMS System Service Call 947.00 09/15/2017 226-45126-440440 09/06/2017 Sherwin Williams - Paint for Gym 186.74 09/15/2017 226-45126-422990 09/06/2017 Super America - Unleaded Fuel - 7.734 gals @ $ 19.33 09/15/2017 217-41990-421200 09/06/2017 Amazon - Paper 89.97 09/15/2017 217-41990-421990 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (09/12/2017 - 11:27 AM) Page 7 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 09/06/2017 ICMA- 2017 Annual Conference Regist (JO) in 790.00 09/15/2017 101-41310-433100 09/06/2017 Fleet Farm - Cleaning Supplies 3.98 09/15/2017 226-45126-421990 09/06/2017 Constant Contact - Monthly Email Subscription 65.00 09/15/2017 226-45122-430900 09/06/2017 U of M CE - Design of Construction Class (RM) 310.00 09/15/2017 101-43111-433100 09/06/2017 E Lifeguard - Whistles & Lanyards (24/ea) 33.91 09/15/2017 226-45124-421990 09/06/2017 Dacotah Paper - Cleaning Supplies 44.22 09/15/2017 101-41941-421990 09/06/2017 Dacotah Paper - Bathroom Supplies 78.13 09/15/2017 101-45501-421990 09/06/2017 Dacotah Paper - Concession Supplies 33.13 09/15/2017 226-45125-421990 09/06/2017 Dacotah Paper - Bathroom & Locker Room Supl 337.67 09/15/2017 226-45126-421990 09/06/2017 Dacotah Paper - Hose Connection Flange 163.45 09/15/2017 226-45126-422990 09/06/2017 G & K - Uniforms, Towels, Mops (1 Invoice) 48.81 09/15/2017 226-45126-421990 09/06/2017 Corporate Connection - Awards for Annual Reco 388.33 09/15/2017 101-41800-443990 09/06/2017 Paula Paulson - Full Drape for Mississippi Roon 425.00 09/15/2017 226-45123-431990 09/06/2017 Domino's Pizza - Meal for CC/PC Meeting 9/5/1 54.12 09/15/2017 101-41910-431990 09/06/2017 Hoglund Bus Co- Jet Vac -Eng. Diag.; sensor can 704.68 09/15/2017 602-49490-440440 09/06/2017 Aramark- uniforms July 2017- Parks 152.13 09/15/2017 101-45201-441700 09/06/2017 Aramark- uniforms July 2017- Sewer 85.51 09/15/2017 602-49490-441700 09/06/2017 Aramark- uniforms July 2017- Water 85.51 09/15/2017 601-49440-441700 09/06/2017 Aramark- uniforms July 2017- Streets 258.16 09/15/2017 101-43120-441700 09/06/2017 Aramark- shop towels July 2017- Shop 339.29 09/15/2017 101-43127-421990 09/06/2017 Royal Tire - #178- (6)tires; mount & dismount; 970.26 09/15/2017 101-43120-422200 09/06/2017 Dan & Jerry's -(4) 8' mum; (4) 1 gal. perin. (4) el 60.50 09/15/2017 101-45201-422500 09/06/2017 Cutter's Edge - chain saw blades- Fire Dept. 87.18 09/15/2017 101-42200-422100 09/06/2017 Runnings - 3pc drill; clevis hook; socket adp; pm 112.81 09/15/2017 101-45201-421650 09/06/2017 Auto Value - battery 120.98 09/15/2017 101-45201-422100 09/06/2017 Steve's Nursery - Black Hills Spruce w/ 25% dis, 225.00 09/15/2017 101-45201-422500 09/06/2017 Dan & Jerry's -(36) asst. plants w/ 25% disc. 272.70 09/15/2017 101-45201-422500 09/06/2017 VerizonWireless World- wall charger 39.99 09/15/2017 101-43120-421990 09/06/2017 Zep- dz. dual force aero; (2) cs black bags; cs. fu 283.79 09/15/2017 101-45201-421650 09/06/2017 Fastenal -- (30) master locks- relock all Lift Sta. 326.40 09/15/2017 602-49490-421990 09/06/2017 Arctic Glacier- resale inv. 1955723305; #23708; 528.63 09/15/2017 609-49750-425500 09/06/2017 Grady's - (2) Cover Sq. Blank 4.98 09/15/2017 101-45201-421650 09/06/2017 Fastenal -- (2) 17oz. Flo Pink 6.98 09/15/2017 101-45201-421650 09/06/2017 Runnings - impact reducing adaptor 14.99 09/15/2017 101-43120-421990 09/06/2017 Monti RV - Door Holder T -Style 15.25 09/15/2017 602-49490-422100 09/06/2017 Big Lake Lumber -7/16 c 12/16' Abitibi Smoot - 15.34 09/15/2017 601-49440-422300 09/06/2017 Cub - (45) limes; (5) lemons 17.50 09/15/2017 609-49750-425500 09/06/2017 Monti Napa 4178 & stocl- (5) filters 19.70 09/15/2017 101-43120-422110 09/06/2017 Home Depot - (28) Cove Oak - 1/2 Water 9.94 09/15/2017 601-49440-422300 09/06/2017 Home Depot - (28) Cove Oak - 1/2 Sewer 9.94 09/15/2017 602-49490-421990 09/06/2017 Home Depot - (8) 2x4-96" prime kd Whitewood 25.60 09/15/2017 101-45201-421650 09/06/2017 Home Depot - (2) 7/16 4x8 OSB 29.30 09/15/2017 101-45201-421650 09/06/2017 Monti RV - (2) Door Holder T -Style 6" 30.60 09/15/2017 602-49490-422100 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (09/12/2017 - 11:27 AM) Page 8 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 09/06/2017 VerizonWireless World- car charger 29.99 09/15/2017 101-43120-421990 09/06/2017 VerizonWireless World- OtterBox case; Screen P 79.98 09/15/2017 101-43120-421990 09/06/2017 Grady's - (6) 60# concrete mix 39.54 09/15/2017 101-45201-421650 09/06/2017 USPS - postage for Fire Dept. 7.20 09/15/2017 101-42200-432200 09/06/2017 Facebook - 9-1-17 Advertising 20.00 09/15/2017 609-49754-434990 09/06/2017 General Rental - core drill; drill bit - Gillard- 9/3 34.95 09/15/2017 101-43120-441500 09/06/2017 Home Depot -mini fridge for Engine 4 122.21 09/15/2017 101-42200-421990 09/06/2017 Locators & Supplies - (4) Stop for Ped signs 1,121.87 09/15/2017 101-43120-422600 09/06/2017 Amazon -eyewear protection; USB Pwr cord- Fii 17.44 09/15/2017 101-42200-421990 09/06/2017 Fleet Farm - coupler; adapter - Parks 58.57 09/15/2017 101-45201-421650 09/06/2017 Monti Napa - weathershield; (4) hose ends 71.94 09/15/2017 101-45201-422100 09/06/2017 Monti Napa -205 Bobcat- fuel filters 56.46 09/15/2017 101-45201-422100 09/06/2017 Hi -Way Liquors- error. Repaid 9/11/17 by emplc 61.20 09/15/2017 101-00000-115030 09/06/2017 Adobe - Sales Tax Refund. Orig Purchase Date' -41.24 09/15/2017 702-00000-424100 09/06/2017 US Bank - Qtrly Rebate -6,414.54 09/15/2017 101-00000-362970 Check Total: 95,994.00 Vendor: 2438 VANCO SERVICES LLC Check Sequence: 9 ACH Enabled: True 00008387892 Vanco - Gateway Exchange - August 2017 16.29 09/15/2017 656-00000-202099 00008387892 Vanco - Gateway Exchange - August 2017 59.22 09/15/2017 601-49440-443980 00008387892 Vanco - Gateway Exchange - August 2017 59.21 09/15/2017 602-49490-443980 Check Total: 134.72 Vendor: 4407 JERRY WEIN Check Sequence: 10 ACH Enabled: False 040416 FNM -001-0593 FINAL credit -Applied to UB A 87.22 04/12/2016 656-00000-115025 Check Total: 87.22 Vendor: 4231 MIKE & DONNA WEINZETL Check Sequence: 11 ACH Enabled: False 090215 FNM -001-0398 FINAL credit - Applied to UB A 6.09 09/15/2015 656-00000-115025 Check Total: 6.09 The preceding list of bills payables was reviewed and approved for payment. Date: 9/25/17 Approved by: Total for Check Run: 164, 821.10 Mayor Brian Stumpf Total of Number of Checks: 11 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (09/12/2017 - 11:27 AM) Page 9 Accounts Payable Computer Check Proof List by Vendor User: Julie.Cheney Printed: 09/21/2017 - 9:16AM Batch: 00203.09.2017 - 203.09.2017 AP Invoice No Description Vendor: 2925 1 ST LINE/LEEWES VENTURES LLC 126724 Flavored Syrups for Concession Drinks Check Sequence: 1 Check Total: Vendor: 2002 ELMER ABBAS 11/10/2015 226-45125-425410 Check Reissue - Visit w/ Santa- 12/5/2015 (2.5) Check Total: Vendor: 1030 ANCOM TECHNICAL CENTER INC 72780 repaired pager - Fire 72781 Check Sequence: 2 repaired pager; Minitor V Belt clip- Fire 72783 False repaired pager - Fire 11/24/2015 226-45127-431990 Check Total: Vendor: 3491 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3206034 resale - beer 3206250 resale - beer 396013 Check Sequence: 3 resale - beer credit inv. #3201656 Enabled: False Check Total: Vendor: 4502 ARVIG 9/8/2017 IT Services - Sept 2017 09/26/2017 101-42200-440440 Check Total: Vendor: 2225 ASPHALT SURFACE TECHNOLOGIES CORI Pay Voucher #2 16C003 - Pay Voucher #2 - 2017 Core Street Iml Check Total: Moiiii6effo Y Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Check Sequence: 1 ACH Enabled: False 336.75 09/26/2017 226-45125-425410 336.75 Check Sequence: 2 ACH Enabled: False 187.50 11/24/2015 226-45127-431990 187.50 Check Sequence: 3 ACH Enabled: False 120.00 09/26/2017 101-42200-440440 134.10 09/26/2017 101-42200-440440 120.00 09/26/2017 101-42200-440440 374.10 Check Sequence: 4 ACH Enabled: False 137.25 09/26/2017 609-49750-425200 200.00 09/26/2017 609-49750-425200 -41.25 09/26/2017 609-49750-425200 296.00 Check Sequence: 5 ACH Enabled: True 340.20 09/26/2017 702-00000-431990 340.20 Check Sequence: 6 ACH Enabled: False 287,689.72 09/26/2017 400-43300-459016 287,689.72 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (09/21/2017 - 9:16 AM) Page 1 Invoice No Description Vendor: 4046 AST SPORTS INC 1103 58286 (24) polo shirts 1103 UB Sept 2017 Invoices - (3778) Print, Fold, Env utx- embroidery (24) polo shirts UB Sept 2017 Invoices - (3778) Print, Fold, Env Enabled: Check Total: Vendor: 4556 ANDYAUSTIN 10/27/17 Event Entertainer for Fall Wine Tasting 10/27/17 ERS dba- (12) o -rings Check Total: Vendor: 1065 BELLBOY CORPORATION 60640700 resale - liquor 60640700 freight Check Total: Vendor: 1067 BERNICK'S 53924 Check Sequence: 8 resale - soda pop 53924 False resale juice 53925 09/26/2017 resale -beer 54667 resale -beer 57213 resale - soda pop 57213 resale -juice 57214 resale - beer 57898 Check Sequence: 9 resale - pop, water Enabled: True Check Total: Vendor: 4792 JOANNE BOMERSINE 9/18/2017 Refund Room Rental Amount Check Total: Vendor: 1080 BRAEMAR MAILING SERVICE INC 58286 UB Sept 2017 Invoices - (3778) FNM Insert 58286 UB Sept 2017 Invoices - (3778) Print, Fold, Env 58286 UB Sept 2017 Invoices - (3778) Print, Fold, Env Enabled: Check Total: Vendor: 3632 BRIAN BRAMLEY 9316 ES dba- $2150 CPE donation- (5) multigas detec 9342 ERS dba- (12) o -rings Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Check Sequence: 7 ACH Enabled: True 300.00 09/26/2017 609-49754-421110 204.00 09/26/2017 609-49754-421110 504.00 Check Sequence: 8 ACH Enabled: False 300.00 09/26/2017 609-49754-425550 300.00 Check Sequence: 9 ACH Enabled: True 374.26 09/26/2017 609-49750-425100 6.08 09/26/2017 609-49750-433300 380.34 Check Sequence: 10 ACH Enabled: False 119.00 09/26/2017 609-49750-425400 16.40 09/26/2017 609-49750-425500 995.00 09/26/2017 609-49750-425200 316.80 09/26/2017 609-49750-425200 41.25 09/26/2017 609-49750-425400 16.40 09/26/2017 609-49750-425500 2,519.40 09/26/2017 609-49750-425200 213.25 09/26/2017 226-45125-425410 4,237.50 Check Sequence: 11 ACH Enabled: False 550.00 09/26/2017 226-45123-347010 550.00 Check Sequence: 12 ACH Enabled: False 37.78 09/26/2017 656-00000-202099 553.76 09/26/2017 601-49440-431800 553.75 09/26/2017 602-49490-431800 1,145.29 Check Sequence: 13 ACH Enabled: True 4,090.74 09/26/2017 101-42200-424100 31.96 09/26/2017 101-42200-422100 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (09/21/2017 - 9:16 AM) Page 2 Invoice No Description Amount Check Total: Vendor: 4328 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN WINE & SPII 1080687323 resale - wine 1080687323 resale - liquor 1080687323 freight 1080687384 resale- beer 1080690515 resale - wine 1080690515 resale - liquor 1080690515 freight 1080690516 resale - beer 2348-149G 1 Check Total: Vendor: 1085 BUILDING MATERIAL SUPPLY INC 41497 (4) slide latch; 4) inswing keeper- srtpd sale tx $ 1987865 Check Total: Vendor: 4797 C W METALS 9/18/2017 2017-19 - Escrow Refund Amount Check Total: Vendor: 3233 C.J.'S LINEN SERVICE 33737 Drape Pressed Check Total: Vendor: 1091 CAMPBELL KNUTSON PA 2348-141G 5 2017-11 - Camping World First Addition Plat -A 2348-142G 3 Estate of John Ellison (conveyance) - August 20 2348-145G 2 2017-20 - Autumn Ridge 4th Addition - August 2348-146G 1 17D003 - Featherstone 3rd Addition -August 2( 2348-147G 1 2017-21 - Spirit Realty - August 2017 2348-149G 1 2017-22 - Affordable Self Storage PUD - Augusi 609-49750-425100 Check Total: Vendor: 4646 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES L.P. 1987865 resale - beer 1992934 resale - beer 1992934 resale - beer n/a Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 4,122.70 Check Sequence: 14 ACH Enabled: False 264.65 09/26/2017 609-49750-425300 3,108.24 09/26/2017 609-49750-425100 48.82 09/26/2017 609-49750-433300 156.60 09/26/2017 609-49750-425200 200.00 09/26/2017 609-49750-425300 1,972.62 09/26/2017 609-49750-425100 24.34 09/26/2017 609-49750-433300 55.40 09/26/2017 609-49750-425200 5,830.67 Check Sequence: 15 ACH Enabled: False 208.18 09/26/2017 101-45201-422300 208.18 Check Sequence: 16 ACH Enabled: False 1,760.00 09/26/2017 101-00000-220110 1,760.00 Check Sequence: 17 ACH Enabled: False 15.00 09/26/2017 226-45123-431990 15.00 Check Sequence: 18 ACH Enabled: True 336.00 09/26/2017 101-00000-220110 16.00 09/26/2017 400-43300-430400 1,200.00 09/26/2017 101-00000-220110 1,110.40 09/26/2017 101-00000-220110 515.20 09/26/2017 101-00000-220110 229.20 09/26/2017 101-00000-220110 3,406.80 Check Sequence: 19 ACH Enabled: True 27,802.00 09/26/2017 609-49750-425200 7,624.27 09/26/2017 609-49750-425200 127.50 09/26/2017 609-49750-425400 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (09/21/2017 - 9:16 AM) Page 3 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 1997779 resale - beer credit -128.00 09/26/2017 609-49750-425200 354-203 resale - beer -20.58 09/26/2017 609-49750-425200 Check Total: 35,405.19 Vendor: 1094 CAREFREE LAWN SERVICE INC Check Sequence: 20 ACH Enabled: True 16398 Hillside Cemetery -(3) mowing; (3) litter/debris 1 480.00 09/26/2017 101-45201-431050 16398 Riverside Cemetery- (2) mowings 1,100.00 09/26/2017 651-49010-431050 Check Total: 1,580.00 Vendor: 3602 CENTRACARE HEALTH MONTICELLO Check Sequence: 21 ACH Enabled: False 9/18/2017 2017-15 - Escrow Refund 8,808.40 09/26/2017 101-00000-220110 Check Total: 8,808.40 Vendor: 1104 CENTRAL LANDSCAPE SUPPLY Check Sequence: 22 ACH Enabled: False 277023 (12) Redmond Linden 2' 2,160.00 09/26/2017 101-43120-422500 Check Total: 2,160.00 Vendor: 1106 CENTRAL MCGOWAN INC Check Sequence: 23 ACH Enabled: False 00146624 Bulk Carbon Dioxide (358 lbs) 98.60 09/26/2017 226-45124-421600 00147356 Bulk Carbon Dioxide (211 lbs) 69.20 09/26/2017 226-45124-421600 00147720 Bulk Carbon Dioxide (144 lbs) 55.80 09/26/2017 226-45124-421600 Check Total: 223.60 Vendor: 4315 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS Check Sequence: 24 ACH Enabled: False 9/1/2017 Digital Receiver 7.91 09/26/2017 101-41110-431990 Check Total: 7.91 Vendor: 3750 MARK CHRISTIANSEN Check Sequence: 25 ACH Enabled: False 9/13/2017 Farmers Market Token Collection Log - 9/7/17 12.00 09/26/2017 226-00000-220100 Check Total: 12.00 Vendor: 4329 MITCH COOPMAN Check Sequence: 26 ACH Enabled: True 8/26/2017 reimburse Fire Dept. Steak Fry- Al sauce; (2) cs 33.03 09/26/2017 101-42200-421990 Check Total: 33.03 Vendor: 2197 CORPORATE CONNECTION Check Sequence: 27 ACH Enabled: False 46137 (17) Lime Class zip hooded swtshrit- Parks 75.00 09/26/2017 101-45201-420650 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (09/21/2017 - 9:16 AM) Page 4 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 46137 (17) Lime Class zip hooded swtshrit- Streets 150.00 09/26/2017 101-43120-420650 46137 (17) Lime Class zip hooded swtshrit- Water 15.00 09/26/2017 601-49440-420650 46137 (17) Lime Class zip hooded swtshrit- Sewer 15.00 09/26/2017 602-49490-420650 46217 (9) safety sweatshirts; (4) safety T -Shirts- Street; 104.73 09/26/2017 101-43120-420650 46217 (9) safety sweatshirts; (4) safety T -Shirts- Parks 79.73 09/26/2017 101-45201-420650 46217 (9) safety sweatshirts; (4) safety T -Shirts- Water 49.72 09/26/2017 601-49440-420650 46217 (9) safety sweatshirts; (4) safety T -Shirts- Water 49.72 09/26/2017 602-49490-420650 Check Total: 538.90 Vendor: 4793 CROWN UNDERGROUND Check Sequence: 28 ACH Enabled: False 9/15/2017 Refund Over Payment for Right of Way Permit 25.00 09/26/2017 101-00000-202010 Check Total: 25.00 Vendor: 4694 CUNNINGHAM GROUP ARCHITECTURE IN Check Sequence: 29 ACH Enabled: False 48394 Small Area Plan thru August 2017 2,000.00 09/26/2017 213-46301-431990 Check Total: 2,000.00 Vendor: 1129 DAHLHEIMER BEVERAGE LLC Check Sequence: 30 ACH Enabled: True 112146-2 resale - beer -Correct 7/25/17 credit used twice 94.38 09/26/2017 609-49750-425200 1300660 resale - beer 16,255.89 09/26/2017 609-49750-425200 1300660 resale - beer n/a 184.80 09/26/2017 609-49750-425400 1300669 resale - beer 4,167.30 09/26/2017 609-49750-425200 1300705 resale - beer n/a 325.10 09/26/2017 609-49750-425400 1300705 resale - beer 22,305.58 09/26/2017 609-49750-425200 1300738 resale - beer 41.70 09/26/2017 609-49750-425200 150415 resale - beer credit inv. #1283867 -4,914.00 09/26/2017 609-49750-425200 152652 resale - beer credit -805.00 09/26/2017 226-45125-425410 153117 resale - beer credit -125.00 09/26/2017 226-45125-425410 155388 resale - beer credit -32.40 09/26/2017 609-49750-425200 157963 resale - beer correct inv.#157662 11.00 09/26/2017 609-49750-425200 158915 resale - beer credit -249.60 09/26/2017 609-49750-425200 158916 resale - beer 255.20 09/26/2017 609-49750-425200 159073 resale - beer 4,057.80 09/26/2017 609-49750-425200 159443 resale - beer 319.45 09/26/2017 609-49750-425200 159486 resale - beer 32.60 09/26/2017 609-49750-425200 Check Total: 41,924.80 Vendor: 4790 SAMUEL DAHMEN Check Sequence: 31 ACH Enabled: False 9/13/17 Performance at Farmers Market 9/7/17 150.00 09/26/2017 226-00000-220100 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (09/21/2017 - 9:16 AM) Page 5 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Page 6 Check Total: 150.00 Vendor: 4191 ELK RIVER GREENHOUSE LLC Check Sequence: 32 ACH Enabled: True 9/13/2017 Farmers Market Token Collection Log - 8/31/17 352.00 09/26/2017 226-00000-220100 Check Total: 352.00 Vendor: 2561 FERGUSON WATERWORKS #2516 Check Sequence: 33 ACH Enabled: False 0258149 Locator repair - SN: 48156- repl. Aux cbl & calil 263.33 09/26/2017 601-49440-440440 0258151 Locator repair - replace batt, tighten hi/lo switch, 304.08 09/26/2017 602-49490-440440 0260542 (2) LF 1 T10 Meters 705.72 09/26/2017 601-49440-422710 Check Total: 1,273.13 Vendor: 2273 FIBERNET MONTICELLO - ACH Check Sequence: 34 ACH Enabled: True 9/8/2017 City Hall Phone - Sept 2017 625.12 09/26/2017 702-00000-432100 9/8/2017 MCC Phone - Sept 2017 487.68 09/26/2017 702-00000-432100 9/8/2017 Ballfields Phone - Sept 2017 19.42 09/26/2017 702-00000-432100 9/8/2017 DMV Phone - Sept 2017 266.69 09/26/2017 702-00000-432100 9/8/2017 Hi Way Liquor Phone - Sept 2017 333.24 09/26/2017 702-00000-432100 9/8/2017 Fire Hall Phone - Sept 2017 203.47 09/26/2017 702-00000-432100 9/8/2017 Public Works Phone - Sept 2017 226.43 09/26/2017 702-00000-432100 9/8/2017 Parks Phone - Sept 2017 113.70 09/26/2017 702-00000-432100 9/8/2017 Prairie Center Phone - Sept 2017 14.16 09/26/2017 702-00000-432100 9/8/2017 Sheriff Phone - Sept 2017 69.72 09/26/2017 702-00000-432100 9/8/2017 City Hall Internet - Sept 2017 124.95 09/26/2017 702-00000-432300 9/8/2017 MCC Internet - Sept 2017 10.00 09/26/2017 702-00000-432300 9/8/2017 Ballfields Internet - Sept 2017 10.00 09/26/2017 702-00000-432300 9/8/2017 DMV Internet - Sept 2017 41.95 09/26/2017 702-00000-432300 9/8/2017 Hi Way Liquor Internet - Sept 2017 41.95 09/26/2017 702-00000-432300 9/8/2017 Fire Hall Internet - Sept 2017 41.95 09/26/2017 702-00000-432300 9/8/2017 Animal Shelter Internet - Sept 2017 29.95 09/26/2017 702-00000-432300 9/8/2017 Public Works Internet - Sept 2017 69.95 09/26/2017 702-00000-432300 9/8/2017 Sheriff Internet - Sept 2017 41.95 09/26/2017 702-00000-432300 9/8/2017 City Hall Cable - Sept 2017 12.95 09/26/2017 101-41310-431990 9/8/2017 MCC Cable - Sept 2017 319.39 09/26/2017 226-45127-432500 9/8/2017 Data Hosting - Sept 2017 500.00 09/26/2017 702-00000-431900 9/8/2017 Service Contract - Sept 2017 250.00 09/26/2017 702-00000-431900 Check Total: 3,854.62 Vendor: 3748 JEFFREY D GARDNER Check Sequence: 35 ACH Enabled: True 9/13/2017 Farmers Market Token Collection Log - 8/31, 17 39.00 09/26/2017 226-00000-220100 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (09/21/2017 - 9:16 AM) Page 6 Invoice No Description Check Total: Vendor: 3762 GARRETTS DIAMOND CITY BREAD 9/13/2017 True Farmers Market Token Collection Log - 9/7/17 09/26/2017 226-00000-220100 Check Total: Vendor: 4796 GOLD NUGGET DEVELOPMENT 9/18/2017 Escrow Refund for Landscaping Check Total: Vendor: 4791 GERALD HANSON 9/5/2017 101-00000-220110 Reimburse - Purchased New Refrigerator for Cit 8,800.00 Check Total: Vendor: 1223 HAWKINS INC 4147005 Pool Chemicals ACH Enabled: True Check Total: Vendor: 4650 JASEN HOGLUND 0197 913.20 BCOL sign; (124) asst. decals Check Total: Vendor: 4218 HOHENSTEINS, INC 918026 True resale - beer 09/26/2017 226-45124-421600 Check Total: Vendor: 3749 DANIEL PAUL HUNZ 9/13/2017 Farmers Market Token Collection Log - 9/7/17 Check Total: Vendor: 3369 JAKE'S EXCAVATING INC 3201 101-45201-421650 Davis grave - 7/1/17 590.00 Check Total: Vendor: 1259 JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING 2705356 resale - beer n/a AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (09/21/2017 - 9:16 AM) Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 39.00 Check Sequence: 36 ACH Enabled: True 32.00 09/26/2017 226-00000-220100 32.00 Check Sequence: 37 ACH Enabled: False 8,800.00 09/26/2017 101-00000-220110 8,800.00 Check Sequence: 38 ACH Enabled: True 913.20 09/26/2017 101-41310-424100 913.20 Check Sequence: 39 ACH Enabled: True 675.52 09/26/2017 226-45124-421600 675.52 Check Sequence: 40 ACH Enabled: False 590.00 09/26/2017 101-45201-421650 590.00 Check Sequence: 41 ACH Enabled: False 696.50 09/26/2017 609-49750-425200 696.50 Check Sequence: 42 ACH Enabled: True 10.00 09/26/2017 226-00000-220100 10.00 Check Sequence: 43 ACH Enabled: True 450.00 09/26/2017 651-49010-431150 450.00 Check Sequence: 44 ACH Enabled: False 50.40 09/26/2017 609-49750-425400 Page 7 Invoice No Description 2705356 resale - beer 2705356 freight 2711345 resale - beer n/a 2711345 resale- beer 2711345 freight 5814014 Check Total: Vendor: 4795 JK BOWERS 9/18/2017 2017-13 - Escrow Refund Check Total: Vendor: 4794 JOHN CHADWICK FARMS LLC 9/18/2017 2017-13 - Escrow Refund Check Total Vendor: 1263 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 5814013 resale - liquor 5814013 freight 5814014 resale - wine 5814014 resale - mix 5814014 freight 5818244 freight 5818244 resale - liquor 5818245 resale - wine 5818245 freight 5818246 resale - beer 5818247 resale -- wine 5818247 freight 5819230 freight 5819230 resale - liquor 5819231 resale - wine 5819231 freight 5819232 resale- beer 5820393 resale- wine 5820393 freight 5822970 resale - liquor 5822970 freight 5824465 freight 5824465 resale - liquor 5824467 resale -beer Amount Payment Date Acct Number 3,336.20 09/26/2017 609-49750-425200 3.00 09/26/2017 609-49750-433300 27.65 09/26/2017 609-49750-425400 1,599.59 09/26/2017 609-49750-425200 3.00 09/26/2017 609-49750-433300 5,019.84 Check Sequence: 45 3,907.75 09/26/2017 101-00000-220110 3,907.75 Check Sequence: 46 3,907.75 09/26/2017 101-00000-220110 3,907.75 Check Sequence: 47 6,047.42 09/26/2017 609-49750-425100 75.99 09/26/2017 609-49750-433300 2,644.70 09/26/2017 609-49750-425300 173.75 09/26/2017 609-49750-425400 90.89 09/26/2017 609-49750-433300 91.07 09/26/2017 609-49750-433300 8,988.60 09/26/2017 609-49750-425100 1,131.35 09/26/2017 609-49750-425300 28.31 09/26/2017 609-49750-433300 259.85 09/26/2017 609-49750-425200 606.00 09/26/2017 609-49750-425300 17.88 09/26/2017 609-49750-433300 43.96 09/26/2017 609-49750-433300 4,427.65 09/26/2017 609-49750-425100 2,506.40 09/26/2017 609-49750-425300 62.59 09/26/2017 609-49750-433300 65.97 09/26/2017 609-49750-425200 488.10 09/26/2017 609-49750-425300 8.94 09/26/2017 609-49750-433300 4,872.85 09/26/2017 609-49750-425100 101.34 09/26/2017 609-49750-433300 97.97 09/26/2017 609-49750-433300 7,781.20 09/26/2017 609-49750-425100 43.98 09/26/2017 609-49750-425200 Reference ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (09/21/2017 - 9:16 AM) Page 8 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 641822 resale - mix credit inv #5686627 -8.43 09/26/2017 609-49750-425400 641823 resale - wine credit inv #5775134 -2.75 09/26/2017 609-49750-425300 641824 resale - wine credit inv #5802946 -26.30 09/26/2017 609-49750-425300 641825 resale - liquor credit inv #5808285 -4.21 09/26/2017 609-49750-425100 642673 resale - liquor credit inv #5812414 -14.81 09/26/2017 609-49750-425100 642674 freight credit inv #5814013 -7.45 09/26/2017 609-49750-433300 642674 resale - liquor credit inv #5814013 -631.50 09/26/2017 609-49750-425100 642675 resale - winecredit inv #5814014 -70.50 09/26/2017 609-49750-425300 642675 freight credit inv #5814014 -1.49 09/26/2017 609-49750-433300 642676 resale - liquor credit inv #5814013 -10.17 09/26/2017 609-49750-425100 Check Total: 39,879.15 Vendor: 1270 KENNEDY AND GRAVEN CHARTERED Check Sequence: 48 ACH Enabled: False MN190-00101 General EDA Matters thru 8/31/17 608.00 09/26/2017 213-46301-430400 MN325-00033 GMEF Loan - Microbrewery thru 8/31/17 323.00 09/26/2017 213-46301-430400 MN325-00034 Services for 220 W Broadway thru 8/31/17 888.44 09/26/2017 213-46301-430400 MN325-00035 Services for 103 Pine St thru 8/31/17 209.00 09/26/2017 213-46301-430400 Check Total: 2,028.44 Vendor: 1279 NEIL KRANZ Check Sequence: 49 ACH Enabled: True 8/26/17 reimburse Fire Dept. Steak Fry- (75) steaks; (3) p 808.12 09/26/2017 101-42200-421990 Check Total: 808.12 Vendor: 1631 LANO EQUIPMENT INC Check Sequence: 50 ACH Enabled: False 02-472862 coupler kit - Parks 76.96 09/26/2017 101-45201-421650 02-475480 Trencher 1 day 9/8/17 150.00 09/26/2017 101-43130-440990 02476460 Trencher days 300.00 09/26/2017 101-43130-440990 Check Total: 526.96 Vendor: 1290 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES Check Sequence: 51 ACH Enabled: False 9/1/2017 MN Mayors Assoc Membership 9/1/17 - 8/31/18 30.00 09/26/2017 101-41110-443300 Check Total: 30.00 Vendor: 1290 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES Check Sequence: 52 ACH Enabled: False 257707 2017 Regional Meeting QS) 45.00 09/26/2017 101-41310-433100 Check Total: 45.00 Vendor: 1291 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRUST Check Sequence: 53 ACH Enabled: False AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (09/21/2017 - 9:16 AM) Page 9 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number 40001103 Ins Premium 7/15/17 - 7/15/18 276.00 09/26/2017 101-41310-436100 40001103 Ins Premium 7/15/17 - 7/15/18 485.00 09/26/2017 101-41520-436100 40001103 Ins Premium 7/15/17 - 7/15/18 77.00 09/26/2017 101-41410-436100 40001103 Ins Premium 7/15/17 - 7/15/18 77.00 09/26/2017 101-41800-436100 40001103 Ins Premium 7/15/17 - 7/15/18 5,422.00 09/26/2017 101-41910-436100 40001103 Ins Premium 7/15/17 - 7/15/18 911.00 09/26/2017 101-41310-436100 40001103 Ins Premium 7/15/17 - 7/15/18 473.00 09/26/2017 101-41941-436100 40001103 Ins Premium 7/15/17 - 7/15/18 2,614.00 09/26/2017 101-42200-436100 40001103 Ins Premium 7/15/17 - 7/15/18 686.00 09/26/2017 101-42400-436100 40001103 Ins Premium 7/15/17 - 7/15/18 910.00 09/26/2017 101-42700-436100 40001103 Ins Premium 7/15/17 - 7/15/18 2,821.00 09/26/2017 101-43110-436100 40001103 Ins Premium 7/15/17 - 7/15/18 68.00 09/26/2017 101-43111-436100 40001103 Ins Premium 7/15/17 - 7/15/18 77.00 09/26/2017 101-43115-436100 40001103 Ins Premium 7/15/17 - 7/15/18 4,710.00 09/26/2017 101-43120-436100 40001103 Ins Premium 7/15/17 - 7/15/18 130.00 09/26/2017 101-43125-436100 40001103 Ins Premium 7/15/17 - 7/15/18 61.00 09/26/2017 101-43127-436100 40001103 Ins Premium 7/15/17 - 7/15/18 14,114.00 09/26/2017 101-45201-436100 40001103 Ins Premium 7/15/17 - 7/15/18 38.00 09/26/2017 101-46102-436100 40001103 Ins Premium 7/15/17 - 7/15/18 2,566.00 09/26/2017 101-49240-436100 40001103 Ins Premium 7/15/17 - 7/15/18 330.00 09/26/2017 101-45501-436100 40001103 Ins Premium 7/15/17 - 7/15/18 5,861.00 09/26/2017 226-45122-436100 40001103 Ins Premium 7/15/17 - 7/15/18 732.00 09/26/2017 217-41990-436100 40001103 Ins Premium 7/15/17 - 7/15/18 406.00 09/26/2017 213-46301-436100 40001103 Ins Premium 7/15/17 - 7/15/18 4,111.00 09/26/2017 601-49440-436100 40001103 Ins Premium 7/15/17 - 7/15/18 4,372.00 09/26/2017 602-49480-436100 40001103 Ins Premium 7/15/17 - 7/15/18 6,357.00 09/26/2017 602-49490-436100 40001103 Ins Premium 7/15/17 - 7/15/18 827.00 09/26/2017 651-49010-436100 40001103 Ins Premium 7/15/17 - 7/15/18 3,184.00 09/26/2017 609-49754-436100 40001103 Ins Premium 7/15/17 - 7/15/18 1,672.00 09/26/2017 656-49870-436100 40001103 Ins Premium 7/15/17 - 7/15/18 51,584.00 09/26/2017 101-00000-155020 40001103 Ins Premium 7/15/17 - 7/15/18 8,205.00 09/26/2017 226-00000-155020 40001103 Ins Premium 7/15/17 - 7/15/18 1,025.00 09/26/2017 217-00000-155020 40001103 Ins Premium 7/15/17 - 7/15/18 568.00 09/26/2017 213-00000-155020 40001103 Ins Premium 7/15/17 - 7/15/18 5,756.00 09/26/2017 601-00000-155020 40001103 Ins Premium 7/15/17 - 7/15/18 15,020.00 09/26/2017 602-00000-155020 40001103 Ins Premium 7/15/17 - 7/15/18 1,158.00 09/26/2017 651-00000-155020 40001103 Ins Premium 7/15/17 - 7/15/18 4,457.00 09/26/2017 609-00000-155020 40001103 Ins Premium 7/15/17 - 7/15/18 2,340.00 09/26/2017 656-00000-155020 Check Total: 154,481.00 Vendor: 1291 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRUST Check Sequence: 54 11446 LMCIT Claim #00036359 - Date of Loss 7/18/1' 1,231.58 09/26/2017 101-43120-443990 Reference ACH Enabled: False AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (09/21/2017 - 9:16 AM) Page 10 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number 1,231.58 Reference Check Total: Vendor: 3933 CHARLES LONG 9/13/2017 226-00000-220100 Farmers Market Token Collection Log - 8/31/17 165.00 Check Total: Vendor: 4456 LUPULIN BREWING LLC 2437 resale - beer 2559 True resale - beer 09/26/2017 609-49750-425200 Check Total: Vendor: 1303 M AMUNDSON CIGAR & CANDY CO, LLP 244382 resale - cigarettes; juice 244382 resale - soda pop; bottle suits; flask; etc Check Total: Vendor: 2819 MADDEN GALANTER HANSEN LLP August 2017 1,285.00 Labor Relations Services - August 2017 609-49750-425500 Check Total: Vendor: 3745 MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 20420324 (545) gal. diesel @ $2.26 20420329 (499) gal. unleaded @ $2.28 20433145 (311) gal. Diesel @ $2.38 20433148 ACH Enabled: (600) gal. Unleaded @ $2.17 335.60 09/26/2017 Check Total: Vendor: 1314 MCDOWALL COMPANY 532009 Qtrly HVAC Maint Agreement Contact #C0520- 532077 Repair Cooling Circuit #1 on A/C Unit for Pool i Check Sequence: 59 ACH Enabled: Check Total: Vendor: 2852 MIDWEST BUSINESS PROMOTIONS INC 12308 (525) Press N Stick Calendars 09/26/2017 101-43120-421200 Check Total: Vendor: 1330 CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS Amount Payment Date Acct Number 1,231.58 Reference AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (09/21/2017 - 9:16 AM) Page 11 Check Sequence: 55 ACH Enabled: False 165.00 09/26/2017 226-00000-220100 165.00 Check Sequence: 56 ACH Enabled: True 463.50 09/26/2017 609-49750-425200 562.50 09/26/2017 609-49750-425200 1,026.00 Check Sequence: 57 ACH Enabled: True 1,285.00 09/26/2017 609-49750-425500 109.20 09/26/2017 609-49750-425400 1,394.20 Check Sequence: 58 ACH Enabled: False 335.60 09/26/2017 101-41800-430400 335.60 Check Sequence: 59 ACH Enabled: True 1,230.96 09/26/2017 101-43120-421200 1,139.48 09/26/2017 101-43120-421200 738.80 09/26/2017 101-43120-421200 1,300.88 09/26/2017 101-43120-421200 4,410.12 Check Sequence: 60 ACH Enabled: False 466.00 09/26/2017 226-45126-431990 1,833.40 09/26/2017 226-45126-440440 2,299.40 Check Sequence: 61 ACH Enabled: True 367.10 09/26/2017 609-49754-434990 367.10 Check Sequence: 62 ACH Enabled: True AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (09/21/2017 - 9:16 AM) Page 11 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 400451001477 August 2017 - Monti Pawn Transactions (204) 183.60 09/26/2017 101-42100-431990 Check Total: 183.60 Vendor: 1349 MN DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION Check Sequence: 63 ACH Enabled: False P00008328 15C004 - MNDOT Material Testing & Inspectioi 483.36 09/26/2017 400-43300-459014 Check Total: 483.36 Vendor: 1881 MONTICELLO PUBLIC SCHOOLS Check Sequence: 64 ACH Enabled: False 9/18/2017 2017-07 - Escrow Refund 7,922.70 09/26/2017 101-00000-220110 Check Total: 7,922.70 Vendor: 1377 MONTICELLO SENIOR CENTER Check Sequence: 65 ACH Enabled: True September 2017 Monthly Allocation - Sept 2017 4,880.00 09/26/2017 101-45175-444310 Check Total: 4,880.00 Vendor: 1379 MONTICELLO UMPIRE ASSOCIATION Check Sequence: 66 ACH Enabled: True 9/8/2017 Umpires Fall Softball League - 2nd Half & Tour 868.00 09/26/2017 226-45127-431990 Check Total: 868.00 Vendor: 1382 MOON MOTOR SALES INC Check Sequence: 67 ACH Enabled: False 9/18/2017 2016-47 - Escrow Refund 1,323.00 09/26/2017 101-00000-220110 Check Total: 1,323.00 Vendor: 1629 MP NEXLEVEL LLC Check Sequence: 68 ACH Enabled: True 1109463 Directional Bore 300 feet of 2" pipe- Sc. Blvd/G 2,695.00 09/26/2017 101-43120-440990 Check Total: 2,695.00 Vendor: 4490 NORTHDALE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY _ Check Sequence: 69 ACH Enabled: False 201611-X04 15C001-CONSTR -Q-3 has been billed for this- 769.82 09/26/2017 400-43300-459011 Pay Voucher 10 15C001 - Pay Voucher #10 - 2016 Street Recons 16,701.79 09/26/2017 400-43300-459011 Check Total: 17,471.61 Vendor: 1401 NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS Check Sequence: 70 ACH Enabled: True 23148 August 2017 - Tech Assistance - City Projects 2,739.08 09/26/2017 101-41910-431990 23149 2017-12 - Carlisle Paxmar PUD Amendment - A 2,053.80 09/26/2017 101-00000-220110 23149 2017-20 - Autumn Ridge PUD Amendment - An 211.90 09/26/2017 101-00000-220110 23149 2017-32 - SPO Townhouse PUD - August 2017 1,841.90 09/26/2017 101-00000-220110 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (09/21/2017 - 9:16 AM) Page 12 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 23149 Bondhus Expansion - August 2017 342.30 09/26/2017 101-41910-431990 23149 Jameson-Bosquez Rehab - August 2017 228.20 09/26/2017 101-41910-431990 23150 August 2017 - Technical Assistance - Meetings 300.00 09/26/2017 101-41910-431990 Check Total: 7,717.18 Vendor: 4472 NOVAK FLECK INC Check Sequence: 71 ACH Enabled: False 9/19/2017 Escrow Refund - 4275 89th St/Featherstone #1' 2,000.00 09/26/2017 101-00000-220110 9/7/2017 Escrow Refund - 8752 Ebersole Ave/Featherston 2,000.00 09/26/2017 101-00000-220110 Check Total: 4,000.00 Vendor: 4368 OFFICE DEPOT INC Check Sequence: 72 ACH Enabled: False 960311259001 (2) dz. 8.5x11 pad; post -it notes; dz. pens 68.08 09/26/2017 101-43110-421990 963937073001 (2)cspaper 71.58 09/26/2017 101-43110-421990 963937218001 hvy duty 3 -hole punch 40.99 09/26/2017 101-43110-421990 Check Total: 180.65 Vendor: 1412 OMANN BROTHERS INC Check Sequence: 73 ACH Enabled: False 12956 (4.95) SPWEA240A "C" Oil - Street Mntc. 251.26 09/26/2017 101-43120-422400 12961 (4.91) SPWEA240A - Street Mntc. 229.59 09/26/2017 101-43120-422400 Check Total: 480.85 Vendor: 1273 PAUSTIS & SONS WINE CO Check Sequence: 74 ACH Enabled: False 8603797 resale - wine 1,693.41 09/26/2017 609-49750-425300 8603797 freight 22.50 09/26/2017 609-49750-433300 Check Total: 1,715.91 Vendor: 4633 PERFORMANCE FOOD GROUP INC Check Sequence: 75 ACH Enabled: True 49634206 Cheese Sauce for Concession 106.24 09/26/2017 226-45125-425410 Check Total: 106.24 Vendor: 1427 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS CO Check Sequence: 76 ACH Enabled: False 2224935 resale - liquor 2,549.75 09/26/2017 609-49750-425100 2224935 freight 43.21 09/26/2017 609-49750-433300 2224936 freight 37.25 09/26/2017 609-49750-433300 2224936 resale - wine 1,109.50 09/26/2017 609-49750-425300 2224936 resale - mix 180.25 09/26/2017 609-49750-425400 2225946 freight 28.31 09/26/2017 609-49750-433300 2225946 resale - liquor 2,481.55 09/26/2017 609-49750-425100 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (09/21/2017 - 9:16 AM) Page 13 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number 2225947 resale - wine 5.96 09/26/2017 609-49750-425300 2227738 resale - liquor 2,218.66 09/26/2017 609-49750-425100 2227738 freight 32.41 09/26/2017 609-49750-433300 2227739 resale- wine 736.00 09/26/2017 609-49750-425300 2227739 resale - wine n/a 116.25 09/26/2017 609-49750-425400 2227739 freight 17.13 09/26/2017 609-49750-433300 2228383 resale - liquor 1,279.70 09/26/2017 609-49750-425100 2228383 freight 22.35 09/26/2017 609-49750-433300 2228384 freight 4.47 09/26/2017 609-49750-433300 2229197 freight 20.86 09/26/2017 609-49750-433300 2229197 resale - wine 781.61 09/26/2017 609-49750-425300 2231057 freight 8.94 09/26/2017 609-49750-433300 2231057 resale - liquor 829.31 09/26/2017 609-49750-425100 2232020 resale - liquor 7,521.05 09/26/2017 609-49750-425100 2232020 freight 108.78 09/26/2017 609-49750-433300 Check Total: 20,133.30 Vendor: 4799 VERGIL PUTNAM Check Sequence: 77 rmbrs 9/18/17 Reimburse tar clean up from MCC lot- wk. done 135.00 09/26/2017 101-43120-421990 Check Total: 135.00 Vendor: 4565 R HOMES Check Sequence: 78 9/7/2017 Escrow Refund - 9154 Golden Pond Ln/Sunset F 2,000.00 09/26/2017 101-00000-220110 9/7/2017 Escrow Refund - 6822 93rd St/Sunset Ponds 3rd 2,000.00 09/26/2017 101-00000-220110 9/7/2017 Escrow Refund - 9180 Golden Pond Ln/Sunset F 2,000.00 09/26/2017 101-00000-220110 9/7/2017 Escrow Refund - 9176 Golden Pond Ln/Sunset F 2,000.00 09/26/2017 101-00000-220110 9/7/2017 Escrow Refund -9035 Golden Pond Ln/Sunset P 2,000.00 09/26/2017 101-00000-220110 9/7/2017 Escrow Refund -9157 Golden/Sunset Ponds 3rd 2,000.00 09/26/2017 101-00000-220110 9/7/2017 Escrow Refund - 9165 Golden Pond Ln/Sunset F 2,000.00 09/26/2017 101-00000-220110 Check Total: 14,000.00 Vendor: 4570 RED ROOSTER PROPERTIES Check Sequence: 79 9/18/2017 2017-16 - Escrow Refund 1,559.20 09/26/2017 101-00000-220110 Check Total: 1,559.20 Vendor: 1455 RED'S MARATHON Check Sequence: 80 08/15/17 #231 -Parks 10.13 09/26/2017 101-45201-421300 8/9 & 24/17- Battery 120.00 09/26/2017 101-43127-422100 8/9 & 24/17- fuel gas can- Streets 39.89 09/26/2017 101-43127-421200 Parks 7/17 Parks- gas #2716/29; green mule 7/7/17 15.48 09/26/2017 101-43120-421200 Reference ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (09/21/2017 - 9:16 AM) Page 14 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Streets 7/17 Streets- 5 gal can 6/28 & 7/13 18.56 09/26/2017 101-43120-421200 Check Total: 204.06 Vendor: 4022 REINHART FOODSERVICE LLC Check Sequence: 81 ACH Enabled: False 914207 Food for Concession Resale 311.86 09/26/2017 226-45125-425410 923275 Food for Concession Resale 424.15 09/26/2017 226-45125-425410 Check Total: 736.01 Vendor: 4575 REPLENISHMENT SOLUTIONS LLC Check Sequence: 82 ACH Enabled: True 1957123 resale - beer 92.00 09/26/2017 609-49750-425200 Check Total: 92.00 Vendor: 4781 RUE 38 LLC Check Sequence: 83 ACH Enabled: False 2028 resale - wine 106.00 09/26/2017 609-49750-425300 2028 freight 1.50 09/26/2017 609-49750-433300 Check Total: 107.50 Vendor: 1474 PATRICIAA SALZWEDEL Check Sequence: 84 ACH Enabled: True 9/6/2017 Mileage Reimbursement - August (300 miles) 160.50 09/26/2017 101-42700-433100 Sept 2nd Semi Monthly Contract Payment 1,593.75 09/26/2017 101-42700-431200 Check Total: 1,754.25 Vendor: 2443 SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA INC Check Sequence: 85 ACH Enabled: False W5762488 8/19/17 - Event Security 140.00 09/26/2017 226-45123-431992 W5769298 8/29/17 - Event Security 140.00 09/26/2017 226-45123-431992 Check Total: 280.00 Vendor: 4474 SITE ONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY Check Sequence: 86 ACH Enabled: False 82417613 RPZ BFP Wilkins; Node 200 cntrlr; (6) blk. box; 1,564.56 09/26/2017 101-43120-422400 Check Total: 1,564.56 Vendor: 4789 SOLDO CONSULTING, P.C. Check Sequence: 87 ACH Enabled: False 1 Professional Employment Services 6,074.60 09/26/2017 101-41800-430400 Check Total: 6,074.60 Vendor: 3309 SOUTHERN GLAZER'S WINE AND SPIRITS. Check Sequence: 88 ACH Enabled: False 1587465 freight 22.87 09/26/2017 609-49750-433300 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (09/21/2017 - 9:16 AM) Page 15 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 1587465 resale - liquor 1,599.58 09/26/2017 609-49750-425100 1587466 resale - wine 1,078.00 09/26/2017 609-49750-425300 1587466 freight 19.60 09/26/2017 609-49750-433300 1590103 freight 15.75 09/26/2017 609-49750-433300 1590103 resale - liquor 1,577.44 09/26/2017 609-49750-425100 1590104 resale - wine 717.89 09/26/2017 609-49750-425300 1590104 freight 16.80 09/26/2017 609-49750-433300 Check Total: 5,047.93 Vendor: 4672 SPECIALTY SOLUTIONS LLC Check Sequence: 89 ACH Enabled: False I47010 ZPARKS-FSTONE - (2) 251b. short native mix 872.14 09/26/2017 101-45201-422500 Check Total: 872.14 Vendor: 4513 AARON STAEHNKE Check Sequence: 90 ACH Enabled: True 9/13/2017 Farmers Market Token Collection Log - 9/7/17 25.00 09/26/2017 226-00000-220100 Check Total: 25.00 Vendor: 3594 STRATEGIC EQUIPMENT, LLC Check Sequence: 91 ACH Enabled: False 2944894 (123) wine glasses w/ logo for Fall Tasting Even 419.35 09/26/2017 609-49754-425550 2945011 resale - shot glasses 24.31 09/26/2017 609-49750-425400 2945011 asst. bags; paper towels; canliner; cleaner 510.54 09/26/2017 609-49754-421990 Check Total: 954.20 Vendor: 1512 SYLVA CORPORATION INC LB 7958 Check Sequence: 92 ACH Enabled: False 52326 (14) Yds- mulch 220.50 09/26/2017 101-45201-422500 Check Total: 220.50 Vendor: 1518 TDS TELECOM Check Sequence: 93 ACH Enabled: True 763-271-3257 TDS 94.89 09/26/2017 702-00000-432100 763-295-2005 TDS 19.11 09/26/2017 702-00000-432100 763-295-3714 TDS 337.66 09/26/2017 702-00000-432100 Check Total: 451.66 Vendor: 4536 JACOB THUNANDER Check Sequence: 94 ACH Enabled: True 9/7/2017 Mileage Reimbursement (20.2 miles) Wright Co 10.81 09/26/2017 101-41910-433100 Check Total: 10.81 Vendor: 1544 US POSTAL SERVICE Check Sequence: 95 ACH Enabled: False AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (09/21/2017 - 9:16 AM) Page 16 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 9/12/2017 PI 42 - UB August Billing (3,778 pcs) (1/2) 855.71 09/26/2017 601-49440-432200 9/12/2017 PI 42 - UB August Billing (3,778 pcs) (1/2) 855.72 09/26/2017 602-49490-432200 9/19/2017 PI 42 - UB Delinquent Billing (500 pcs) (1/2) 113.25 09/26/2017 601-49440-432200 9/19/2017 PI 42 - UB Delinquent Billing (500 pcs) (1/2) 113.25 09/26/2017 602-49490-432200 Check Total: 1,937.93 Vendor: 1550 VEOLIA WATER N AM OPERATING SERV L: Check Sequence: 96 ACH Enabled: True 90121941 Oct 2017 WWTP Operations & Maintenance 61,548.00 09/26/2017 602-49480-430800 Check Total: 61,548.00 Vendor: 1552 VIKING COCA COLA BOTTLING CO Check Sequence: 97 ACH Enabled: True 2018861 resale - soda pop 455.00 09/26/2017 609-49750-425400 2025807 resale - soda pop 237.25 09/26/2017 609-49750-425400 731125 resale - soda pop 460.00 09/26/2017 609-49750-425400 Check Total: 1,152.25 Vendor: 1684 VINOCOPIA Check Sequence: 98 ACH Enabled: True 0187693 -CM resale - wine credit -8.00 09/26/2017 609-49750-425300 0188083 resale - liquor 251.50 09/26/2017 609-49750-425100 0188083 freight 10.00 09/26/2017 609-49750-433300 0188613 resale - liquor 448.00 09/26/2017 609-49750-425100 0188613 resale - wine 248.00 09/26/2017 609-49750-425300 0188613 freight 16.00 09/26/2017 609-49750-433300 Check Total: 965.50 Vendor: 4514 LY LEE VUE Check Sequence: 99 ACH Enabled: True 9/13/2017 Farmers Market Token Collection Log - 9/7/17 75.00 09/26/2017 226-00000-220100 Check Total: 75.00 Vendor: 1561 WATER LABORATORIES INC Check Sequence: 100 ACH Enabled: False 6391 August 2017 Water Testing 240.00 09/26/2017 601-49440-422740 Check Total: 240.00 Vendor: 4220 WEBBER RECREATIONAL DESIGN, INC Check Sequence: 101 ACH Enabled: True 743 (12) belt swing seat; (25) shackle; (2) wrench 447.16 09/26/2017 101-45201-421650 Check Total: 447.16 Vendor: 4798 WIN-SISF Check Sequence: 102 ACH Enabled: False AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (09/21/2017 - 9:16 AM) Page 17 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 9/18/2017 ZUNION - Escrow Refund 127.00 09/26/2017 101-00000-220110 Check Total: 127.00 Vendor: 1572 THE WINE COMPANY Check Sequence: 103 ACH Enabled: True 47989 resale - wine 940.00 09/26/2017 609-49750-425300 47989 freight 16.50 09/26/2017 609-49750-433300 Check Total: 956.50 Vendor: 1573 WINE MERCHANTS INC Check Sequence: 104 ACH Enabled: False 7148260 freight 2.24 09/26/2017 609-49750-433300 7148891 freight 5.96 09/26/2017 609-49750-433300 7149118 freight 13.41 09/26/2017 609-49750-433300 7149118 resale - wine 864.00 09/26/2017 609-49750-425300 Check Total: 885.61 Vendor: 1577 WRIGHT CO AUDITOR-TREAS - ACH Check Sequence: 105 ACH Enabled: True 9/12/2017 Court Fines & Fees for August 2017 2,544.48 09/26/2017 101-42100-430410 Check Total: 2,544.48 Vendor: 1581 WRIGHT CO RECORDER Check Sequence: 106 ACH Enabled: False 201700000077 201716 - Red Rooster Misc Amendment # A135, 46.00 09/26/2017 101-41910-431990 201700000077 201715 - Centra Care Monticello CUP # A1351S 46.00 09/26/2017 101-41910-431990 201700000077 201715 - Gold Nuggest Misc Amendment # A13 46.00 09/26/2017 101-41910-431990 Check Total: 138.00 Vendor: 1584 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC Check Sequence: 107 ACH Enabled: True 010276-000 2 201722 - Affordable Self Storage/KP Properties 228.00 09/26/2017 101-00000-220110 010454-000 1 17C002 - 7th Street & Cedar Street Improvemen 1,143.25 09/26/2017 400-43300-430300 01494-700 48 General WWTP - July 2017 680.00 09/26/2017 602-49480-430300 02596-040 GIS Support Services - July 2017 3,175.00 09/26/2017 702-00000-431990 02596-1031 General Engineering Services Phase 5 - July 201 2,660.00 09/26/2017 101-43111-430300 02596-1031 General Engineering Services Phase 5 - July 201 2,660.00 09/26/2017 601-49440-430300 02596-1031 General Engineering Services Phase 5 - July 201 2,660.00 09/26/2017 602-49490-430300 02596-1031 General Engineering Services Phase 6 - July 201 1,350.00 09/26/2017 101-43111-430300 02596-100 26 15C001 - 2016 Street Reconstruction Project - Ji 1,644.50 09/26/2017 400-43300-459011 02596-160 19 15C004 - 7th Street/Th 25 Intersection Improver 26,747.75 09/26/2017 400-43300-459014 02596-220 10 201707 - Monticello Middle School Expansion I 1,199.00 09/26/2017 101-43111-430300 02596-2509 School District PUD Plan Review - July 2017 1,471.50 09/26/2017 101-43111-430300 02596-2807 201638 - IRT Plan Review - July 2017 697.00 09/26/2017 101-43111-430300 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (09/21/2017 - 9:16 AM) Page 18 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number 02596-2906 Monticello Business Center Drainage Study - Jul 916.00 09/26/2017 263-49200-431990 02596-340 10 2016-2017 Market Matching - July 2017 1,603.00 09/26/2017 213-46301-431990 02596-360 10 16C003 - 2017 Street Improvements - July 2017 49,824.75 09/26/2017 400-43300-459016 02596-3905 Monticello Specialty Clinic - July 2017 763.00 09/26/2017 101-43111-430300 02596-4007 16C006 - Fallon Ave Improvements - July 2017 81,805.75 09/26/2017 400-43300-459018 02596-4104 201711 - Camping World Phase 2 - July 2017 1,361.00 09/26/2017 101-43111-430300 02596-4205 201710 - Spaeth Plan Review - July 2017 1,229.00 09/26/2017 101-43111-430300 1494-95035 14C002 - Phosphorus Reduction - July 2017 611.50 09/26/2017 602-00000-165010 1627-680 18 16D002 - Mills Fleet Farm Plan Review - July 21 1,296.50 09/26/2017 101-00000-220110 R-010149-000 3 201720 - Autumn Ridge 3rd Addition Replat - Ji 3,209.00 09/26/2017 101-00000-220110 R-010383-000 1 BCOL Budget Consulting - July 2017 640.00 09/26/2017 101-45201-431990 R010148-000 3 17D002 - Red Rooster Properties Plan Review - 380.00 09/26/2017 101-00000-220110 R010150-000 3 201727 - CentraCare Health Plan Review - July: 76.00 09/26/2017 101-00000-220110 R010151-000 1 201726 - Featherstone 3rd Addition - July 2017 3,983.50 09/26/2017 101-00000-220110 R010266-000 3 201721 - Crown Bay Retail - July 2017 76.00 09/26/2017 101-00000-220110 R010397-000 1 201728 - Rustech Brewing CUP - July 2017 532.00 09/26/2017 101-00000-220110 Check Total: 194,623.00 Vendor: 1589 ZIEGLER CAT Check Sequence: 108 A1251001 Caterpillar rental 8/16 thm 9/12 3,430.00 09/26/2017 101-43120-441500 PC001907741 Gasket O; (4) seals; gasket- Park Lift Sta. 44.22 09/26/2017 602-49490-422100 SW050281433 Meadow Oaks Lift troubleshoot- needs fuel injec 418.68 09/26/2017 602-49490-440440 SW050281480 W. Park Lift Sta. Generator repairs 1,660.71 09/26/2017 602-49490-440440 Check Total: Total for Check Run: Total of Number of Checks: 5,553.61 Reference ACH Enabled: False The preceding list of bills payables was reviewed and approved for payment. 1,019,547.42 Date: 9/25/17 Approved by: 108 Mayor Brian Stumpf AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (09/21/2017 - 9:16 AM) Page 19 City Council Agenda 9/25/17 2B. Consideration of approving new hires and departures for Citv departments (TE) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The Council is asked to ratify the hiring and departures of employees that have occurred recently in the departments listed. It is recommended that the Council officially ratify the hiring/departure of all listed employees including part-time and seasonal workers. By ratifying departures, the council also approves the expenditure for final amounts due to terminated and otherwise departing employees. Al. Budget Impact: (positions are generally included in budget) A2. Staff Work Load Impact: If new positions, there may be some training involved. If terminated positions, existing staff would pick up those hours, as needed, until replaced. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to ratify the hire/departures of the employees as identified on the attached list. 2. Motion to deny the recommended hires and departures. C. RECOMMENDATION: By statute the City Council has the authority to approve all hires/departures. City staff recommends Alternative #1, for the Council to approve the hires and/or departures as listed. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • List of new/terminated employees NEW EMPLOYEES Name Title Department Hire Date Class Billy Vickers Streets Worker Streets 9/21/2017 Seasonal TERMINATING EMPLOYEES Name Reason Department Last Day Class Gina Rajkowski Voluntary MCC 7/25/17 PT Alex Hoglund Voluntary Parks 8/23/17 PT Trevor Bautch Voluntary Parks 8/25/17 PT Heaven Knutson Voluntary MCC 8/26/17 PT Milissa Holland Voluntary MCC 8/30/17 PT Sarah Renslow Voluntary MCC 9/1/17 Seasonal Amanda Prodoehl Voluntary MCC 9/5/17 Seasonal Ryan Zumbrunnen Voluntary MCC 9/11/17 PT New Hire and Terms City Council 2017.xlsx: 9/20/2017 City Council Agenda: 09/25/2017 2C. Consideration of approving sale or disposal of surplus property (WO) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The Council is asked to declare certain items as surplus property and authorize the sale or disposal of those items. The MCC traded in a IPC Gansow CT riding floor scrubber machine for a new piece of equipment. Al. Budget Impact: Varies by the value of the property. A2. Staff Work Load Impact: Depends on the value of the property. Some items will be shopped as salvage; other items may go to auction or sold via formal bids or informal bids. State contracting laws will govern in absence of city policy. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the sale or disposal of surplus property as identified on the attached lists. 2. Motion to deny the sale or disposal of surplus property as recommended. C. RECOMMENDATION: Staff Recommends Option 1 to approve the sale or disposal of surplus property as identified. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • Surplus List — MCC Equipment/Supplies Surplus List Department: MCC 1. $100,000 + A. B. 2. $50,000 - $100,000 A. B. 3. $25,000.00 - $50,000.00 A. B. 4. $10,000 - $25,000 A. B. C. 5. $2,500 - $10,000 A. B. C. 6. $1,000 - $2,500 A. B. C. 7. $100 - $1,000 A. IPC Gansow CT 70 Riding Floor Scrubber Machine B. C. 8. $0-$100 A. B. C. Date: 9/25/2017 City Council Agenda: 09/25/17 2D. Consideration to approve Resolution 2017-65 accepting donation in the amount of $1000 from various donors for the IEDC Industry of the Year event (AS, JS) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The IEDC is hosting the Industry of the Year breakfast on October 4, 2017 at 7 a.m. There were four business that each donated $250 for sponsorship. Sponsorship supports the cost of the complimentary breakfast event. These four businesses include: the Monticello Times; Cargill Kitchen Solutions, Xcel Energy, and WSI Industries. As required by state statute, if the City accepts the donation of funds, the City Council needs to adopt a resolution specifying the amount of the donation and its use. Al. Budget Impact: The donation for sponsorship will offset the cost of the breakfast event. A2. Staff Workload Impact: None. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the contribution and authorize use of funds as specified. 2. Motion to not approve the contribution and return the funds to the donors. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommendation is to adopt the resolution accepting the contributions. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • Resolution 2017-65 City of Monticello RESOLUTION NO. 2017-65 RESOLUTION APPROVING CONTRIBUTIONS WHEREAS, the City of Monticello is generally authorized to accept contributions of real and personal property pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Sections 465.03 and 465.04 for the benefit of its citizens and is specifically authorized to maintain such property for the benefit of its citizens in accordance with the terms prescribed by the donor. Said gifts may be limited under provisions of MN Statutes Section 471.895. WHEREAS, the following persons and or entities have offered to contribute contributions or gifts to the City as listed: DONOR/ENTITY DESCRIPTION VALUE Monticello Times Cash Contribution $250.00 Cargill Kitchen Solutions Cash Contribution $250.00 WSI Industries Cash Contribution $250.00 Xcel Energy Cash Contribution $250.00 WHEREAS, all said contributions are intended to aid the City in establishing facilities, operations or programs within the city's jurisdiction either alone or in cooperation with others, as allowed by law; and WHEREAS, the City Council hereby finds that it is appropriate to accept the contributions offered. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Monticello: 1. The contributions described above are hereby accepted by the City of Monticello. 2. The contributions described above will be used as designated by the donor. This may entail reimbursing or allocating the money to another entity that will utilize the funds for the following stated purpose: DONOR/ENTITY PURPOSE/AMOUNT Monticello Times IEDC Industry of the Year Breakfast Cargill Kitchen Solutions IEDC Industry of the Year Breakfast WSI Industries IEDC Industry of the Year Breakfast Xcel Energy IEDC Industry of the Year Breakfast Adopted by the City Council of Monticello this 25th day of September, 2017. Brian Stumpf, Mayor ATTEST: Jennifer Schreiber, City Clerk City Council Agenda: 9/25/2017 2E. Consideration of avvrovin2 a credit card securitv volicv (SR/WO) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Currently, the city processes credit card payments for customer charges at the liquor store, community center, and city hall. In addition, utility billing payments can be made by credit card online. In order to be compliant with Payment Card Industry (PCI) requirements, the city needs to adopt a formal policy outlining data security practices. The PCI requirements apply to how the city stores, processes, and transmits cardholder data. Al. Budget Impact: This action will not have a significant budget impact. A2. Staff Impact: Minimal. Having an established policy will provide current practices with the force of council approval. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the card security policy. 2. Motion to approve the credit card security policy with the following modifications: 3. Motion to deny the card security policy. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends approving Alternative #1. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • City of Monticello Credit Card Security Policies PCI DSS 3.2 Version 1.1 — September 25, 2017 TY OP Monticello City of Monticello, Minnesota Credit Card Security Policies PCI DSS 3.2 Version 1.1 - September, 25, 2017 CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION This document is the property of the City of Monticello, Minnesota; it contains information that is proprietary, confidential, or otherwise restricted from disclosure. If you are not an authorized recipient, please return this document to the above-named owner. Dissemination, distribution, copying or use of this document in whole or in part by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited without prior written permission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. Revision History Initial Publication City Council/ Finance 9/25/17 Department INTRODUCTION AND SCOPE Introduction This document explains the city of Monticello, Minnesota (the city)'s credit card security requirements as required by the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI DSS) Program. The city's management is committed to these security policies to protect information utilized by the city in attaining its business goals. All employees are required to adhere to the policies described within this document. Scope of Compliance The PCI requirements apply to all systems that store, process, or transmit cardholder data. Currently, the city's cardholder environment consists only of limited payment applications (typically point-of-sale systems) connected to the internet, but does not include storage of cardholder data on any computer system. Due to the limited nature of the in -scope environment, this document is intended to meet the PCI requirements as defined in Self -Assessment Questionnaire (SAQ) C, ver. 3.0, released February, 2014. Should the city implement additional acceptance channels, add additional connected systems, begin storing cardholder data in electronic format, or otherwise become ineligible to validate compliance under SAQ C, it will be the responsibility of the city to determine the appropriate compliance criteria and implement additional policies and controls as needed. Requirement 1: Build and Maintain a Secure Network Firewall Configuration Firewalls must restrict connections between untrusted networks and any system in the cardholder data environment. An "untrusted network" is any network that is external to the networks belonging to the entity under review, and/or which is out of the entity's ability to control or manage. Access to the internet must be through a firewall, as must any direct connection to a vendor, processor, or service provider.(PCI Requirement 1.2) Inbound and outbound traffic must be restricted by the firewalls to that which is necessary for the cardholder data environment. All other inbound and outbound traffic must be specifically denied. (PCI Requirement 1.2.1) Perimeter firewalls must be installed between any wireless networks and the cardholder data environment. These firewalls must be configured to deny or control (if such traffic is necessary for business purposes) any traffic from the wireless environment into the cardholder data environment. (PCI Requirement 1.2.3) Firewall configuration must prohibit direct public access between the Internet and any system component in the cardholder data environment as follows: • Direct connections are prohibited for inbound and outbound traffic between the Internet and the cardholder data environment. (PCI Requirement 1.3.3) • Outbound traffic from the cardholder data environment to the Internet must be explicitly authorized by management and controlled by the firewall. (PCI Requirement 1.3.5) • Firewalls used to protect the cardholder data environment must implement stateful inspection, also known as dynamic packet filtering. (PCI Requirement 1.3.6) Any mobile and/or employee -owned computers with direct connectivity the Internet (for example, laptops used by employees), which also have the ability to access the organization's cardholder data environment must have a local (personal) software firewall installed and active. This firewall must be configured to specific standards, and not alterable by mobile and/or employee -owned computer users. (PCI Requirement 1.4) Requirement 2: Do not use Vendor -Supplied Defaults for System Passwords and Other Security Parameters Vendor Defaults Vendor -supplied defaults must always be changed before installing a system on the network. Examples of vendor -defaults include passwords, SNMP community strings, and elimination of unnecessary accounts. (PCI Requirement 2.1) Default settings for wireless systems must be changed before implementation. Wireless environment defaults include, but are not limited to: (PCI Requirement 2.1.1) • Default encryption keys • Passwords • SNMP community strings • Default passwords/passphrases on access points • Other security -related wireless vendor defaults as applicable Firmware on wireless devices must be updated to support strong encryption (such as WPA or WPA2) for authentication and transmission of data over wireless networks. Configuration Standards for Systems Configuration standards for all system components must be developed and enforced. The city must insure that these standards address all known security vulnerabilities and are consistent with industry -accepted system hardening standards. (PCI Requirement 2.2) Configuration standards must be updated as new vulnerability issues are identified, and they must be enforced on any new systems before they are added to the cardholder data environment. The standards must cover the following: • Changing of all vendor -supplied defaults and elimination of unnecessary default accounts. • Implementing only one primary function per server to prevent functions that require different security levels from co -existing on the same server. (PCI Requirement 2.2.1) • Enabling only necessary services, protocols, daemons, etc., as required for the function of the system. (PCI Requirement 2.2.2) • Implementing additional security features for any required services, protocols or daemons that are considered to be insecure. (PCI Requirement 2.2.3) • Configuring system security parameters to prevent misuse • Removing all unnecessary functionality, such as scripts, drivers, features, subsystems, file systems, and unnecessary web servers. (PCI Requirement 2.2.5) System administrators and any other personnel that configure system components must be knowledgeable about common security parameter settings for those system components. They must also be responsible to insure that security parameter settings set appropriately on all system components before they enter production. (PCI Requirement 2.2.4) System administrators are responsible to insure that security policies and operational procedures for managing vendor defaults and other security parameters are documented, in use, and known to all affected parties. (PCI Requirement 2.5) Non -Console Administrative Access Credentials for non -console administrative access must be encrypted using technologies such as SSH, VPN, or SSL/TLS. Encryption technologies must include the following: (PCI Requirement 2.3) • Must use strong cryptography, and the encryption method must be invoked before the administrator's password is requested. • System services and parameter files must be configured to prevent the use of telnet and other insecure remote login commands. • Must include administrator access to web -based management interfaces. • Use vendor documentation and knowledge of personnel to verify that strong cryptography is in use for all non -console access and that for the technology in use it is implemented according to industry best practices and vendor recommendations. Requirement 3: Protect Stored Cardholder Data Prohibited Data Processes must be in place to securely delete sensitive authentication data (defined below) post -authorization so that the data is unrecoverable. (PCI Requirement 3.2) Payment systems must not store of sensitive authentication data in any form after authorization (even if encrypted). Sensitive authentication data is defined as the following: • The full contents of any track data from the magnetic stripe (located on the back of a card, equivalent data contained on a chip, or elsewhere) are not stored under any circumstance. (PCI Requirement 3.2.1) • The card verification code or value (three -digit or four -digit number printed on the front or back of a payment card) is not stored under any circumstance. (PCI Requirement 3.2.2) • The personal identification number (PIN) or the encrypted PIN block are not stored under any circumstance. (PCI Requirement 3.2.3) Displaying PAN The city will mask the display of PANs (primary account numbers), and limit viewing of PANS to only those employees and other parties with a legitimate need. A properly masked number will show at most only the first six and the last four digits of the PAN. This requirement does not supersede stricter requirements in place for displays of cardholder data—for example, legal or payment card brand requirements for point-of-sale (POS) receipts. Policies and procedures for masking the display of PANs must mandate the following: (PCI requirement 3.3) • A list of roles that need access to displays of full PAN is documented, together with a legitimate business need for each role to have such access. • PAN must be masked when displayed such that only personnel with a legitimate business need can see the full PAN. • All other roles not specifically authorized to see the full PAN must only see masked PANs. Requirement 4: Encrypt Transmission of Cardholder Data Across Open, Public Networks Transmission of Cardholder Data In order to safeguard sensitive cardholder data during transmission over open, public networks, the city will use strong cryptography and security protocols (for example, SSL/TLS, IPSEC, SSH, etc.). These controls will be implemented as follows: (PCI Requirement 4.1) • Only trusted keys and certificates are accepted. • The protocol in use only supports secure versions or configurations. • The encryption strength is appropriate for the encryption methodology in use. Industry best practices (for example, IEEE 802.11 i) must be used to implement strong encryption for authentication and transmission for wireless networks transmitting cardholder data or connected to the cardholder data environment. Weak encryption (for example, WEP, SSL version 2.0 or older) is not to be used as a security control for authentication or transmission. (PCI Requirement 4. 1.1) Sending unencrypted PANs by end-user messaging technologies is prohibited. Examples of end-user technologies include email, instant messaging and chat. (PCI requirement 4.2) Requirement 5: use and Regularly Update Anti -Virus Software or Programs Anti -Virus Protection All systems, particularly personal computers and servers commonly affected by viruses, must have installed an anti-virus program which is capable of detecting, removing, and protecting against all know types of malicious software. (PCI Requirement 5.1, 5.1.1) For systems considered to be not commonly affected by malicious software, the city will perform periodic evaluations to identify and evaluate evolving malware threats in order to confirm whether such systems continue to not require anti-virus software. (PCI Requirement 5.1.2) All anti-virus programs must be kept current through automatic updates, be actively running, be configured to run periodic scans, and be capable of as well as configured to generate audit logs. Anti-virus logs must also be retained in accordance with PCI requirement 10.7. (PCI Requirement 5.2) Steps must be taken to insure that anti-virus mechanisms are actively running and cannot be disabled or altered by users, unless specifically authorized by management on a case-by-case basis for a limited time period. (PCI Requirement 5.3) Requirement 6: Develop and Maintain Secure Systems and Applications Risk and Vulnerability The city will establish a process to identify security vulnerabilities, using reputable outside sources for security vulnerability information, and assign a risk ranking (for example, as "high," "medium," or "low") to newly discovered security vulnerabilities. Risk rankings are to be based on industry best practices as well as consideration of potential impact. For example, criteria for ranking vulnerabilities may include consideration of the CVSS base score, and/or the classification by the vendor, and/or type of systems affected. Methods for evaluating vulnerabilities and assigning risk ratings will vary based on an organization's environment and risk -assessment strategy. Risk rankings should, at a minimum, identify all vulnerabilities considered to be a "high risk" to the environment. In addition to the risk ranking, vulnerabilities may be considered "critical" if they pose an imminent threat to the environment, impact critical systems, and/or would result in a potential compromise if not addressed. Examples of critical systems may include security systems, public -facing devices and systems, databases, and other systems that store, process, or transmit cardholder data. (PCI Requirement 6.1) All critical security patches must be installed with one month of release. This includes relevant patches for operating systems and all installed applications. All applicable non-critical vendor -supplied security patches are installed within an appropriate time frame (for example, within three months). (PCI Requirement 6.2) Requirement 7: Restrict Access to Cardholder Data by Business Need to Know Limit Access to Cardholder Data Access to the city's cardholder system components and data is limited to only those individuals whose jobs require such access. (PCI Requirement 7.1) Access limitations must include the following: • Access rights for privileged user IDs must be restricted to the least privileges necessary to perform job responsibilities. (PCI Requirement 7.1.2) • Privileges must be assigned to individuals based on job classification and function (also called "role - based access control). (PCI Requirement 7.1.3) Requirement 8: Assign a Unique ID to Each Person with Computer Access Remote Access Two -factor authentication must be incorporated for remote access (network -level access originating from outside the network) to the network by employees, administrators, and third parties. (PCI Requirement 8.3) Vendor Accounts All accounts used by vendors for remote maintenance shall be enabled only during the time period needed. Vendor remote access accounts must be monitored when in use. (PCI Requirement 8.1.5) Requirement 9: Restrict Physical Access to Cardholder Data Physically Secure All Areas and Media Containing Cardholder Data All publicly accessible network jacks must have physical and/or logical controls to restrict access to the secure network by unauthorized personnel. (PCI requirement 9.1.2) Hard copy materials containing confidential or sensitive information (e.g., paper receipts, paper reports, faxes, etc.) are subject to the following storage guidelines: All media must be physically secured. (PCI requirement 9.5) Strict control must be maintained over the internal or external distribution of any kind of media containing cardholder data. These controls shall include: (PCI Requirement 9.6) • Media must be classified so the sensitivity of the data can be determined. (PCI Requirement 9.6.1) • Media must be sent by a secure carrier or other delivery method that can be accurately tracked. (PCI Requirement 9.6.2) • Management approval must be obtained prior to moving the media from the secured area. (PCI Requirement 9.6.3) Strict control must be maintained over the storage and accessibility of media containing cardholder data. (PCI Requirement 9.7) Destruction of Data All media containing cardholder data must be destroyed when no longer needed for business or legal reasons. (PCI requirement 9.8) Hardcopy media must be destroyed by shredding, incineration or pulping so that cardholder data cannot be reconstructed. (PCI requirement 9.8.1.a) Containers storing information waiting to be destroyed must be secured (locked) to prevent access to the contents by unauthorized personnel. (PCI requirement 9.8.1.b) Protection of Payment Devices Devices that capture payment card data via direct physical interaction with the card (such as swipe readers and any other payment terminals) must be protected. This protection must include preventing the devices from being tampered with or substituted. (PCI requirement 9.9) The city must maintain an up-to-date list of devices. Employees shall be instructed to maintain the integrity and currency of the inventory. The list should include the following: (PCI requirement 9.9.1) • Make and model of all devices. • Location of each device (for example, the address of the site or facility where the device is located). • Device serial number or other method of unique identification. The payment devices must be periodically inspected. Check surfaces to detect tampering (for example, addition of card skimmers to devices). Checks must also be made that will detect substitution (for example, by checking the serial number or other device characteristics to verify it has not been swapped with a fraudulent device). (PCI requirement 9.9.2) Employees and contractors who interact with the payment devices must be provided with training that enables them to be aware of attempted tampering or replacement of devices. Training should include the following: (PCI requirement 9.9.3) • Employees must verify the identity of any third -party persons claiming to be repair or maintenance personnel prior to granting them access to modify or troubleshoot devices. • Employees must be instructed not to install, replace, or return devices without verification from management. The inventory list (required previously) must be updated by the employee when device locations are changed or new devices are added. • Employees need to be aware of suspicious behavior around devices (for example, attempts by unknown or unauthorized persons to unplug or open devices). Requirement 10: Regularly Monitor and Test Networks Audit Log Collection The city will implement technical controls that create audit trails in order to link all access to system components to an individual user. The automated audit trails created will capture sufficient detail to reconstruct the following events: • All actions taken by any individual with root or administrative privileges. (PCI Requirement 10.2.2) • All invalid logical access attempts (failed logins). (PCI Requirement 10.2.4) • Any use of and changes to identification and authentication mechanisms—including but not limited to creation of new accounts and elevation of privileges—and all changes, additions, or deletions to accounts with root or administrative privileges. (PCI Requirement 10.2.5) The city's log generating and collecting solution will capture the following data elements for the above events: • User identification. (PCI Requirement 10.3.1) • Type of event. (PCI Requirement 10.3.2) • Date and time. (PCI Requirement 10.3.3) • Success or failure indication. (PCI Requirement 10.3.4) • Origination of event. (PCI Requirement 10.3.5) • Identity or name of affected data, system component, or resource. (PCI Requirement 10.3.6) Audit Log Review The city's systems administrators will perform daily review of the audit logs. This review may be manual or automated but must monitor for and evaluate: (PCI Requirement 10.6.1) • All security events. • Logs of all system components that store, process, or transmit CHID and/or SAD, or that could impact the security of CHID and/or SAD. • Logs of all critical system components. • Logs of all servers and system components that perform security functions (for example, firewalls, intrusion -detection systems/intrusion-prevention systems (IDS/IPS), authentication servers, e-commerce redirection servers, etc.). The audit review must also check the logs of all other system components periodically based on the organization's policies and risk management strategy, as determined by the organization's annual risk assessment. (PCI Requirement 10.6.2) Subsequent to log review, systems administrators or other responsible personnel will follow up exceptions and anomalies identified during the review process. (PCI Requirement 10.6.3) The city must retain audit trail history for at least one year, with a minimum of three months immediately available for analysis (for example, online, archived, or restorable from backup). (PCI Requirement 10.7) Requirement 11: Regularly Test Security Systems and Processes Testing for Unauthorized Wireless Access Points At least quarterly, the city will perform testing to ensure there are no unauthorized wireless access points (802.11) present in the cardholder environment. (PCI Requirement 11.1) The methodology must be adequate to detect and identify any unauthorized wireless access points, including at least the following: • WLAN cards inserted into system components. • Portable or mobile devices attached to system components to create a wireless access point (for example, by USB, etc.). • Wireless devices attached to a network port or network device. To facilitate the detection process, the city will maintain an inventory of authorized wireless access points including a documented business justification. (PCI Requirement 11.1.1) If automated monitoring is utilized (for example, wireless IDS/IPS, NAC, etc.), the configuration must be capable of generating alerts to notify personnel. Detection of unauthorized wireless devices must be included in the Incident Response Plan (see PCI Requirement 12.10). (PCI Requirement 11.1.2) Vulnerability Scanning At least quarterly, and after any significant changes in the network (such as new system component installations, changes in network topology, firewall rule modifications, product upgrades), the city will perform vulnerability scanning on all in -scope systems. (PCI Requirement 11.2) Internal vulnerability scans must be performed at a minimum quarterly and repeated until passing results are obtained, or until all "high" vulnerabilities as defined in PCI Requirement 6.1 are resolved. Scan reports must be retained for a minimum of a year. (PCI Requirement 11.2.1) Quarterly external vulnerability scan results must satisfy the ASV Program guide requirements (for example, no vulnerabilities rated higher than a 4.0 by the CVSS and no automatic failures). External vulnerability scans must be performed by an Approved Scanning Vendor (ASV), approved by the Payment Card Industry Security Standards Council (PCI SSC). Scan reports must be retained for a minimum of a year. (PCI Requirement 11.2.2) For both internal and external vulnerability scans, the city shall perform rescans as needed to validate remediation of failures detected during previous scans, as well as after any significant change to the network. Scans must be performed and reviewed by qualified personnel. (PCI Requirement 11.2.3) If segmentation is used to isolate the CDE from other networks, perform tests at least annually and after any changes to segmentation controls/methods to verify that the segmentation methods are operational and effective, and isolate all out -of -scope systems from in -scope systems. These tests need to be done from multiple locations on the internal network, checking both for improper accessibility from the out -of -scope zones to the in -scope zone as well as the reverse. (PCI Requirement 11.3.4) For all in -scope systems for which it is technically possible, the city must deploy a change -detection mechanism (for example, file -integrity monitoring tools) to alert personnel to unauthorized modification of critical system files, configuration files, or content files; and configure the software to perform critical file comparisons at least weekly. The change detection software must be integrated with the logging solution described above, and it must be capable of raising alerts to responsible personnel. (PCI Requirement 11.5.1) For change -detection purposes, critical files are usually those that do not regularly change, but the modification of which could indicate a system compromise or risk of compromise. Change -detection mechanisms such as file - integrity monitoring products usually come pre -configured with critical files for the related operating system. Other critical files, such as those for custom applications, must be evaluated and defined by the entity (that is, the merchant or service provider). (PCI Requirement 11.5) Requirement 12: Maintain a Policy that Addresses Information Security for Employees and Contractors Security Policy The city shall establish, publish, maintain, and disseminate a security policy that addresses how the company will protect cardholder data. (PCI Requirement 12.1) This policy must be reviewed at least annually, and must be updated as needed to reflect changes to business objectives or the risk environment. (PCI requirement 12.1.1) Critical Technologies The city shall establish usage policies for critical technologies (for example, remote -access technologies, wireless technologies, removable electronic media, laptops, tablets, personal data/digital assistants (PDAs), email, and internet usage. (PCI requirement 12.3) These policies must include the following: • Explicit approval by authorized parties to use the technologies. (PCI Requirement 12.3.1) • Authentication for use of the technology. (PCI Requirement 12.3.2) • A list of all such devices and personnel with access. (PCI Requirement 12.3.3) • Acceptable uses of the technologies. (PCI Requirement 12.3.5) • Acceptable network locations for the technologies. (PCI Requirement 12.3.6) • Automatic disconnect of sessions for remote -access technologies after a specific period of inactivity. (PCI Requirement 12.3.8) • Activation of remote -access technologies for vendors and business partners only when needed by vendors and business partners, with immediate deactivation after use. (PCI Requirement 1 2.3.9) Security Responsibilities The city's policies and procedures must clearly define information security responsibilities for all personnel. (PCI Requirement 12.4) Incident Response Policy The Finance Manager shall establish, document, and distribute security incident response and escalation procedures to ensure timely and effective handling of all situations. (PCI requirement 12.5.3) Incident Identification Employees must be aware of their responsibilities in detecting security incidents to facilitate the incident response plan and procedures. All employees have the responsibility to assist in the incident response procedures within their particular areas of responsibility. Some examples of security incidents that an employee might recognize in their day to day activities include, but are not limited to, • Theft, damage, or unauthorized access (e.g., papers missing from their desk, broken locks, missing log files, alert from a security guard, video evidence of a break-in or unscheduled/unauthorized physical entry). • Fraud — Inaccurate information within databases, logs, files or paper records. Reporting an Incident The Finance Manager should be notified immediately of any suspected or real security incidents involving cardholder data: Contact the Finance Manager to report any suspected or actual incidents. No one should communicate with anyone outside of their supervisor(s) or the Finance Manager about any details or generalities surrounding any suspected or actual incident. All communications with law enforcement or the public will be coordinated by the Communications Coordinator. Document any information you know while waiting for the Finance Manager to respond to the incident. If known, this must include date, time, and the nature of the incident. Any information you can provide will aid in responding in an appropriate manner. Incident Response Policy (PCI requirement 12.10.1) Responses can include or proceed through the following stages: identification, severity classification, containment, eradication, recovery and root cause analysis resulting in improvement of security controls. Contain, Eradicate, Recover and perform Root Cause Analysis 1. Notify applicable card associations. Visa Provide the compromised Visa accounts to Visa Fraud Control Group within ten (10) business days. For assistance, contact 1-(650)-432-2978. Account numbers must be securely sent to Visa as instructed by the Visa Fraud Control Group. It is critical that all potentially compromised accounts are provided. Visa will distribute the compromised Visa account numbers to issuers and ensure the confidentiality of entity and non-public information. See Visa's "What to do if compromised" documentation for additional activities that must be performed. That documentation can be found at http://usa.visa.com/download/business/accer)tinq visa/ops risk management/cisp what to do if comer omised.pdf MasterCard Contact your merchant bank for specific details on what to do following a compromise. Details on the merchant bank (aka. the acquirer) can be found in the Merchant Manual at http://www.mastercard.com/us/wce/PDF/12999 MERC-Entire Manual.pdf. Your merchant bank will assist when you call MasterCard at 1-(636)-722-4100. Discover Card Contact your relationship manager or call the support line at 1-(800)-347-3083 for further guidance. 2.Alert all necessary parties. Be sure to notify: a. Merchant bank b. Local FBI Office c. U.S. Secret Service (if Visa payment data is compromised) d. Local authorities (if appropriate) 3.Perform an analysis of legal requirements for reporting compromises in every state where clients were affected. The following source of information must be used: htti)://www.ncsl.orq/r)roqrams/lis/cir)/i)riv/breach.htm 4.Collect and protect information associated with the intrusion. In the event that forensic investigation is required the Wright County Sheriff Department will work with legal and management to identify appropriate forensic specialists. 5. Eliminate the intruder's means of access and any related vulnerabilities. 6. Research potential risks related to or damage caused by intrusion method used. Root Cause Analysis and Lessons Learned Not more than one week following the incident, members of the city's management and all affected parties will meet to review the results of any investigation to determine the root cause of the compromise and evaluate the effectiveness of the Incident Response Plan. Review other security controls to determine their appropriateness for the current risks. Any identified areas in which the plan, policy or security control can be made more effective or efficient, must be updated accordingly. Security Awareness The city shall establish and maintain a formal security awareness program to make all personnel aware of the importance of cardholder data security. (PCI Requirement 12.6) Service Providers The city shall implement and maintain policies and procedures to manage service providers. (PCI requirement 12.8) This process must include the following: • Maintain a list of service providers. (PCI requirement 12.8.1) • Maintain a written agreement that includes an acknowledgement that the service providers are responsible for the security of the cardholder data the service providers possess. (PCI requirement 1 2.8.2) • Implement a process to perform proper due diligence prior to engaging a service provider. (PCI requirement 12.8.3) • Monitor service providers' PCI DSS compliance status. (PCI requirement 12.8.4) • Maintain information about which PCI DSS requirements are managed by each service provider, and which are managed by the entity. (PCI requirement 12.8.5) City Council Agenda: 09/25/17 2F. Consideration of approving Change Order No. 2 and adopting Resolution 2017-67 accepting improvement and authorizing final pavment of $79,850.11 to DI -MAR Construction for the WWTF Phosphorous Reduction and Digester Cover Improvements Proiect, Citv Proiect No.14CO02 (SB) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: This project had two primary components. The first component involved reducing the amount of phosphorous discharged from the facility to comply with more stringent MPCA permit limits. Associated improvements included addition of a chemical storage and feed building at the wastewater facility, the addition of mixing capability for the SBR's and maintenance related to the aeration system within the SBR's. The second component of the project included replacement of the digester tank covers, which had reached the end of their useful life and required replacement. Construction began in August 2015 and was substantially complete on December 30, 2016. Final punch list items were recently completed in 2017, which included minor pump repair work, system testing, final painting, final restoration and establishment, submittal of as-builts and O&M manuals, other minor items and submittal of final paperwork from the contractor in order to process final payment and acceptance. Change Order No. 2 involves a deduct in the amount of $41,519.94 for allowances in the contract for the following items: SBR cleaning and aeration system repair, digester tank rehabilitation, digester mixer overall, electrical conduits, as detailed in the enclosed change order document. Fixed dollar amount allowances were identified in the contract representing an estimate of the cost to complete this work. Final amounts for these items were based on the actual costs to complete the work, which resulted in a deduct for this work. The Council is being requested to accept the project as complete and approve final payment to DI -MAR Construction in the amount of $79,850.11. The final payment request represents the final quantities completed on the contract, Change Orders No. 1 and No. 2 and the release of the retainage on the contract. The final construction cost totaled $2,675,918.66. The original contract amount was $2,660,000 and was amended to $2,723,671.00 with the approved Change Order No. 1 on March 14, 2016, for digester cover modifications and other minor work. With approval of the Change Order No. 2 deductions and the final payment request, the final contract totals $2,675,918.66. The following paperwork was recently submitted for final payment to be released: Satisfactory showing that the contractor has complied with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes 290.92 requiring withholding state income tax (IC 134 forms). City Council Agenda: 09/25/17 2. Evidence in the form of an affidavit that all claims against the contractor by reasons of the contract have been fully paid or satisfactorily secured (lien waivers). 3. Consent of Surety to Final Payment certification from the contractor's surety. 4. Two-year maintenance bond. It should be noted that the maintenance bond will start and extend two years from the substantial completion of the project per the contract, which was December 30, 2016. Therefore the two-year maintenance bond will expire on December 30, 2018. Al. Budget Impact: As noted above, the final payment due to DI -MAR Construction is $79,850.11. The City received a Point Source Implementation Grant (PSIG) and a low interest PFA loan from the MPCA to fund the project. The PFA loan and PSIG are reimbursable costs, so the City has been upfronting the construction payments, then invoicing the MPCA to receive reimbursement. The upfront costs and loan payments are coming from the sewer enterprise fund which has adequate cash flow to accommodate these payments. The total project cost will be under the original $3,423,526 projected total project cost in which the PSIG and PFA funding was determined. Final invoices from all consultants (WSB and their sub -consultants for architectural, electrical, mechanical, material testing and painting inspection) are being reviewed to determine final expenses. A2. Staff Workload Impact: Impacts to staff workload will be minimal and routine for the project. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Consideration of Resolution 2017-66 approving Change Order No. 2, accepting improvement and authorizing final payment of $79,850.11 to DI -MAR Construction for the WWTF Phosphorous Reduction and Digester Cover Improvements Project, City Project No. 14C002. 2. Motion deny Resolution 2017-66 at this time. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends Alternative #1. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Resolution 2017-67 City Council Agenda: 09/25/17 B. Letter of Recommendation C. Change Order No. 2 Detail D. Construction Pay Voucher No. 17 (Final) CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2017-67 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING IMPROVEMENTS AND AUTHORIZING FINAL PAYMENT OF $79,850.11 TO DIM -MAR CONSTRUCTION FOR THE WWTF PHOSPHOROUS REDUCTION AND DIGESTER COVER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, CITY PROJECT NO. 14CO02 WHEREAS, pursuant to a written contract with the City of Monticello, on June 22, 2015, DI -MAR Construction was awarded, by low bid, for the Phosphorous Reduction and Digester Cover Improvements, City Project 14C002; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOL VED BY THE CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA that the work completed under said contract is hereby accepted and approved and that the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby directed to issue a proper order for the final payment on such contract subject to receipt of the following: , 1) Satisfactory showing that the contractor has complied with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes 290.92 requiring withholding state income tax (IC 134); 2) Evidence in the form of an affidavit that all claim` against thecontractor by of the contract have been fully paid or satisfactorily secured (lien waivers); 3) Consent o 4) Two year City Coun ADOPTED BY the Monticello City Council this 25th day of September, 2017. : I ATTEST: NNOP Jennifer Schreiber, City Clerk I of the project by the CITY OF MONTICELLO Brian Stumpf, Mayor ■ WSB 701 Xenia Avenue South I Suite 300 1 Minneapolis, MN 55416 1 (763) 541-4800 September 19, 2017 Ms. Jennifer Schreiber City Clerk City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1 Monticello, MN 55362 Re: Change Order No. 2, Construction Pay Voucher No. 17 (Final), and Final Project Documents WWTF Phosphorus Reduction and Digester Improvements City Project No. 14CO02 City of Monticello, MN WSB Project No. 1494-95 Dear Ms. Schreiber: Please find enclosed Construction Pay Voucher No. 17 and final (in triplicate) in the amount of $79,850.11 for the above -referenced project. The final payment request represents the Change Order No. 2 contract adjustment, the final quantities completed for the project, and the release of the remaining retainage. We recommend that the City of Monticello approve Change Order No. 2 and Construction Pay Voucher No. 17 and final for DI -MAR Construction, Inc. at the September 25, 2017, City Council meeting and accept the project as complete. Enclosed is the following documentation required for releasing final payment for the above -referenced project: 1. Satisfactory showing that the contractor has complied with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes 290.92 requiring withholding state income tax (IC134 forms). 2. Evidence in the form of an affidavit that all claims against the contractor by reasons of the contract have been fully paid or satisfactorily secured (lien waivers). 3. Consent of Surety to Final Payment certification from the contractor's surety. 4. Two-year maintenance bond. The maintenance period will be in effect from when the project was substantially complete on December 30, 2016, until December 30, 2018. Building a legacy —your legacy. Equal Opportunity Employer I wsbeng.com K.101494-9501AdminlConstruction AdminlPay Requests11494-95 CST LTR VO 17 FNL CTY-j schreiber-091917.docx Ms. Jennifer Schreiber September 19, 2017 Page 2 Please contact me at (763) 271-3236 if you have any questions. Thank you. Sincerely, WSB & Associates, Inc. IA�-- t. 45�'Atl Shibani K. Bisson, PE Project Manager Enclosures cc: Sarah Rathlisberger, City of Monticello Dick Hollatz, DI -MAR Construction, Inc. srb K.101494-9501AdminlConstruction AdminlPay Requests11494-95 CST LTR VO 17 FNL CTYj schreiber-091917.docx CHANGE bRDER` NO.2 WWTF PHOSPHOROUS REDUCTION AND DIGESTER COVER IMPROVEMENTS CITY PROJECT NO. 14CO02 CITY OF MONTICELLO, MN WSB PROJECT NO. 1494.95 OWNER: CITY OF MONTICELLO 505 WALNUT STREET, SUITE 1 MONTICELLO, MN 55362 CONTRACTOR: DI -MAR CONSTRUCTION 7900 EXCELSIOR BLVD, SUITE 100 HOPKINS, MN 55343 YOU ARE DIRECTED TO MAKE THE FOLLOWING CHANGES IN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION: September 8, 2017 1) Credit the contract to deduct the remaining unused balance for the SBR Cleaning and Aeration System Repair Allowance. CREDIT AMOUNT: $18,855.51 2) Credit the contract to deduct the remaining unused balance for the Digester Tank Rehabilitation Allowance. CREDIT AMOUNT: $21,262.75 3) Credit the contract to deduct the remaining unused balance for the Digester Mixer Overhaul Allowance. CREDIT AMOUNT: $901.68 4) Deduct for the elimination of two 3/4" electrical conduits. CREDIT AMOUNT: $500.00 It is acknowledged by the contract parties that the project completion dates may have been affected by item #1 in change order #1. A specific determination as to the amount of time necessary to add to the contract to complete the work was recognized. The Contractor met the goal for substantial completion in 2016 and performed start-up, restoration, and punch list follow-up in 2017. A formalized extension of the dates by change order is recommended as part of Change Order #2 for contract close-out. IT IS UNDERSTOOD THAT THIS CHANGE ORDER INCLUDES ALL ADDITIONAL COSTS AND TIME EXTENSIONS WHICH ARE IN ANY WAY, SHAPE, OR FORM ASSOCIATED WITH THE WORK ELEMENTS DESCRIBED ABOVE. CHANGE IN CONTRACT PRICE: CHANGE IN CONTRACT TIME: FINAL COMPLETION ORIGINAL CONTRACT PRICE: $2,660,000.00 ORIGINAL CONTRACT TIME: 10/31/2016 PREVIOUS CHANGE ORDERS: N/A $63,671.00 NET CHANGE FROM PREVIOUS CHANGE ORDERS: 0 CONTRACT PRICE PRIOR TO THIS CHANGE ORDER: $2,723,671.00 CONTRACT TIME PRIOR TO THIS CHANGE ORDER: 10/31/2016 NET INCREASE OF THIS CHANGE ORDER: ($41,519.94) NET INCREASE OF CHANGE ORDER: 334 CONTRACT PRICE WITH ALL APPROVED CHANGE ORDERS: $2,682,151.06 CONTRACT TIME WITH APPROVED CHANGE ORDERS: 9/30/2017 RECOMMENDED BY: APPROVED BY: G O GER� NDER, � . PR ,r CT NAGER CONTRACTOR SI ATURE WSB & ASSOCIATES, INC. ENGINEER APPROVED BY: SHIBANI K. BISSON, PE, CITY ENGINEER DATE DI -MAR CONSTRUCTION, INC. CONTRACTOR CITY ADMINISTRATOR K:101494.95014dminlConstruction AdminlChange Orders) Page 1 1494-95 CO 2.OraltCO 2 AL (Owner: City of Monticello, MN WSB IFor Period: 12/17/16 to 09/18/17 (Contractor: DI -MAR Construction, Inc. Date: September 18, 2017 Request No.: 17 AND FINAL PAY VOUCHER WWTF PHOSPHORUS REDUCTION AND DIGESTER IMPROVEMENTS CITY PROJECT NO. 14CO02 CITY OF MONTICELLO, MN WSB PROJECT NO. 1494-95 SUMMARY 1 Original Contract Amount 2 Change Order - Addition 3 Change Order - Deduction 4 Revised Contract Amount 5 Value Completed to Date 6 Material on Hand 7 Amount Earned 8 Less Retainage 0.0% 9 Subtotal 10 Less Amount Paid Previously 11 AMOUNT DUE THIS PAY VOUCHER NO Recommended for Approval by: WSB & ASSOCIATES, INC. R 4� 4 ject Manager/Engineer Approved by Contractor: DI -MAR CONSTRUCTION, INC. SEE ATTACHED FOR CONTRACTOR SIGNATURE Specified Contract Completion Date: October 31, 2016 $ 2,660,000.00 $ 63,671.00 $ 41,519.94 $ 2,682,151.06 $ 2,675,918.66 $ 0.00 $ 2,675,918.66 $ 0.00 $ 2,675,918.66 $ 2,596,068.55 17 AND FINAL $ 79,850.11 Approved by Owner: CITY OF MONTICELLO, MN Date: K: 101494-95OL4dminlConstruction AdminlPay Requestsl Page 1 of 2 1494-95 CST Voucher No 17 FNL-091817VO 17 FNL Cover PROJECT PAYMENT STATUS OWNER: CITY OF MONTICELLO, MN WSB PROJECT NO. 1494-95 CONTRACTOF DI -MAR CONSTRUCTION, INC. CHANGE ORDERS No. Date Description Amount 1 03/14/16 Change Order No. 1 (see change order document for description) $63,671.00 2 09/08/17 Change Order No. 2 (see change order document for description) ($41,519.94) Total Change Orders PAYMENT SUMMARY $22,151.06 Material on Hand $0.00 ITotal Payment to Date $2,675,918.66 ITotal Retainage to Date $0.00 ITotal Amount Earned to Date $2,675,918.66 Original Contract Change Orders Revised Contract $2,660,000.00 $22,151.06 $2,682,151.06 K:101494.95014dminlConstruction AdminlPay Requests) Page 2 of 2 1494-95 CST Voucher No 17 FNL-091817VO 17 FNL Summary Current Total Total Amount No. From To Payment Retainage Earned 1 08/01/15 08/25/15 $66,563.27 $3,503.33 $70,066.60 2 08/26/15 09/15/15 $95,899.61 $8,550.68 $171,013.56 3 09/16/15 10/26/15 $231,619.35 $20,741.17 $414,823.40 4 10/27/15 11/26/15 $123,959.88 $27,265.37 $545,307.48 5 11/27/15 12/24/15 $44,317.50 $29,597.87 $591,957.48 6 12/25/15 01/25/16 $123,751.94 $36,111.13 $722,222.68 7 01/26/16 03/28/16 $245,812.34 $49,048.63 $980,972.52 8 03/29/16 04/25/16 $151,523.97 $57,023.57 $1,140,471.43 9 04/26/16 05/25/16 $200,800.68 $67,592.03 $1,351,840.57 10 05/26/16 06/27/16 $79,713.12 $71,787.46 $1,435,749.12 11 06/28/16 07/28/16 $402,414.21 $92,967.15 $1,859,343.02 12 07/29/16 08/26/16 $215,901.07 $104,330.37 $2,086,607.31 13 08/27/16 09/26/16 $163,358.90 $112,928.20 $2,258,564.04 14 09/27/16 10/26/16 $174,055.91 $122,089.04 $2,441,780.79 15 10/27/16 11/28/16 $178,158.84 $131,465.82 $2,629,316.41 16 11/29/16 12/16/16 $98,217.96 $66,565.86 $2,662,634.41 17 AND FNL 12/17/16 09/18/17 $79,850.11 $0.00 $2,675,918.66 Material on Hand $0.00 ITotal Payment to Date $2,675,918.66 ITotal Retainage to Date $0.00 ITotal Amount Earned to Date $2,675,918.66 Original Contract Change Orders Revised Contract $2,660,000.00 $22,151.06 $2,682,151.06 K:101494.95014dminlConstruction AdminlPay Requests) Page 2 of 2 1494-95 CST Voucher No 17 FNL-091817VO 17 FNL Summary DATE: 8/31/2017 TO: City of Monticello, MN FROM: DI -MAR Construction, Inc / 7900 Excelsior Blvd, Hopkins, MN 55345 APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT APPL. # Eighteen PERIOD: FINAL BILLING PROJECT: WastewaterTreatment Plant ENG: WSB & Assocoates 701 Xenia Ave. South Minneapolis, MN 55416 Original Contract Amount $2,660,000.00 Net Change by Change Orders 22,151.06 Contract Sum Todate $2,682,151.06 Total Completed & Stored Todate $2,675,918.66 Retainage: 0 % of Contract $0.00 Total Earned less Retainage $2,675,918.66 Total Previous Payment Amounts $2,596,068.55 AMOUNT DUE THIS REQUEST $79,850.11 CERTIFICATE OF CONTRACTOR I hereby ceritfy that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, all items, quantities, and prices of work and material shown on this Estimate are correct and that all work has been performed in full accordance with the terms and conditions of the Contract for this project between the Owner and the undersigned Contractor and as amended by any authorized changes, and that the foregoing is a true and correct statement of the contract amount for the period covered by this Estimate. DI -MAR Construction, Inc CERTIFIED BY ENGINEER This is to certified that in accordance with the terms of the contract the contractor is entiltled to the amount certicied below. AMOUNT RECOMMENDED WSB & Assoc. By: 1 IDI-MAR CONSTRUCTION, INC. SCHEDULE OF VALUES I i � 1 Item IMOBILIZATIC N CLEARING AND GRUBBING REMOVE CURB & GUTTER REMOVE CHAIN LINE FENCE REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT REMOVE BOLLARDS (REMOVE SIDE GATES, OPENER F & I SLIDE GATE & OPERATOR COMMON EXCAVATION', SUBGRADEEXCAVATION i ISELECT GRI4NULAR BORROW AGREGATEII,BASE CLASS 5 MILL BITUMINOUS SURFACE BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACk COAZ TYPE SP 121.5 WEARING COURSE j TYPE SP 121.5 NON WEARING COURSE (IRRIGATION' SYSTEM PROVISION REMOVE CONCRETE APRON WWTP PHCSHORUS REDUCTION( SCADA SYSTEM ALLOWANCE iSBR CLEANING & REPAIR ALLOWANCE (CONNECT TO EXISTING MANHOLES 4" PVC SAI}IITAY SERVICE PIPE I CONSTRUOT SANITARY MANHOLE (48") CONSTRUCT 4" INSIDE DROP DUCTILEIRON FITTINGS CONNECT'TO EXISTING WATERNlIAIN 13" WATER MAIN-DUCTILE IRON CLASS 5e 6" PVC CASING PIPE ICASTING ASSEMBLY i 1ADJUST CASTING ASSEMBLY 6" CONCRETE WALK Page 1 Balance Monticello -Pay Unit Total Previous Units this Total This Completed % Units Quantity Price Price Applications Application Application Todate Complete LUMP SUM 1 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 50,000.00 $ - $ 50,000.00 100% LUMP SUM 1 $500.00 $500.00 500.00 $ $ 500.00 100% LIN FT 185 $4.00 $740.00 740.00 $ - $ 740.00 100% LIN FT 55 $5.00 $275.00 275.00 $ - $ 275.00 100% SQ YARD 1034 $5.00 $5,170.00 5,170.00 - $ - $ 5,170.00 100% EACH 2 $300.00 $600.00 600.00 $ - $ 600.00 100% EACH 1 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 3,000.00 $ $ 3,000.00 100% EACH 1 $11,500.00 $11,500.00 10,350.00 0.1 $ 1,150.00 $ 11,500.00 100% CU YARD 277 $4.00 $1,108.00 1,108.00 - $ - $ 1,108.00 100% CU YARD 50 $15.00 $750.00 750.00 - $ $ 750.00 100% CU YARD 720 $20.00 $14,400.00 14,400.00 $ - $ 14,400.00 100% TON 646 $30.00 $19,380.00 19,380.00 $ - $ 19,380.00 100% SQ YARD 134 $9.00 $1,206.00 1,206.00 $ - $ 1,206.00 100% GALLON 88 $11.00 $968.00 968.00 $ $ 968.00 100% TON 198 $104.00 $20,592.00 20,592.00 $ $ 20,592.00 100% TON 231 $98.00 $22,638.00 22,638.00 $ $ 22,638.00 100% LUMP SUM 1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 1,000.00 $ $ 1,000.00 100% SQ FT 100 $7.00 $700.00 700.00 $ $ 700.00 100% LUMP SUM 1 $1,502,712.00 $1,502,712.00 1,496,862.00 0.004 $ 5,850.00 $1,502,712.00 100% LUMP SUM 1 $150,000.00 $150,000.00 150,000.00 $ - $ 150,000.00 100% LUMP SUM 1 $75,000.00 $75,000.00 52,124.49 0.26 $ 22,875.51 $ 75,000.00 100% EACH 1 $500.00 $500.00 500.00 $ - $ 500.00 100% LIN FT 215 $25.00 $5,375.00 5,375.00 $ - $ 5,375.00 100% LIN FT 19 $160.00 $3,040.00 3,040.00 $ - $ 3,040.00 100% EACH 1 $800.00 $800.00 800.00 $ - $ 800.00 100% POUND 280 $2.00 $560.00 560.00 $ - $ 560.00 100% EACH 1 $500.00 $500.00 500.00 $ - $ 500.00 100% LIN FT 215 $40.00 $8,600.00 8,600.00 $ - $ 8,600.00 100% LIN FT 215 $30.00 $6,450.00 6,450.00 $ - $ 6,450.00 100% EACH 2 $400.00 $800.00 800.00 $ - $ 800.00 100% EACH 1 $250.00 $250.00 250.00 $ - $ 250.00 100% SQ ST 264 $5.00 $1,320.00 1,320.00 - $ - $ 1,320.00 100% Page 1 Balance Monticello -Pay CONCRETEURBB612 LIN FT 75 $30.001 $2,250.001 2,250.00 $ i $ 2,250.00 100% CONCRETE CURB MODIFIED D LIN FT 97 $36.001 $3,492.001 3,492.00 $ = j $ 3,492.00 100% (PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP EACH 1 $500.001 $500.00 500.00 $ $ 500.00 100% INSTALL CONCRETE APRON SQ YD 12 $100.00 $1,200.001 1,200.00 1 $ - $ 1,200.00 100% BOLLARDS EACH 2 $500.00 $1,000.00 1,000.00 $ - $ 1,000.00 100% INSTALL CHAIN LINK FENCE j LIN FT 125 $33.00 $4,125.00 $ 4,125.00 $ - $ 4,125.00 100% TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP SUM 1 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ - $ 2,000.00 100% SILT FENCE, TYPE PREASSEMBLED LIN FT 1285 $1.40 $1,799.00 341.60 $ - $ I 341.60 19% STORM DRAINAI INLET PROTECTION EACH 2 $200.001 $400.00 400 $ - $ 400.00 100% FILTER LOG TYPE STRAW BIOROLL LIN FT 65 $5.00 $325.00 10 - $ - $ 50.00 15% TEMP. CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE EACH 2 $500.00 $1,000.00 $ - 1 $ - 100% SEEDING ACRE 0.2 $500.00 $100.00 0.2 $ 100.00 $ 100.00 100% SODDING, ,TYPE LAWN SQ YD 675 $5.00 $3,375.00 200.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 30% j $1,932,000.00 $1,895,877.09 $30,975.51 $1,926,892.60 TOTAL SCHEDULE A - PHOSPHORUS 1 (Change Omer # 1 j (Change Order# 2 i I j GRAND TOTAL BID 50,000.00 $ 50,000.00 SCHEDULE B- DIGESTER COVER $ 1,000.00 542,275.00 $ 542,275.00 100,000.00 $ 77,073.00 MOBILIZATION $ 29,098.32 LUMP SUM 1 $50,000.001 REMOVETREE j EACH 1 $1,000.00 DIGESTER COVER & IMPROVEME(NTS LUMP SUM 1 $542,275.00 DIGESTER TANK REHABILITATIN ALLOW, LUMP SUM 1 $100,000.00 IDIGESTER'MIXER OVERHAUL ALLOWAN( LUMP SUM 1 $30,000.00 TEMPORARY FENCING - ORANGE CONST LIN FT 350 $4.00 TRAFFIC G�JNTROL LUMP SUM 1 $2,000.00 SEEDING ACRE 0.2 $500.00 Sodding SQ YD 225 $5.00 1 (Change Omer # 1 j (Change Order# 2 i I j GRAND TOTAL BID 50,000.00 $ 50,000.00 1,000.001 $ 1,000.00 542,275.00 $ 542,275.00 100,000.00 $ 77,073.00 30,000.00 $ 29,098.32 1,400.00 $ 1,400.00 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 200.00 1 $ 200.00 1,125.00 $ - 728,000.00 $ 703,046.32 63,671.00 $ 63,671.00 (41,519.94) $ 2,682,151.06 $2,662,634.411 $ $ 23,828.68 $ 726,875.00 1 $ - $ 63,671.00 $ (41,519.94) $ (41,519.94) 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100°x° 100% 0% 1,457.40 275.00 1,000.00 2,375.00 $5,107.40 1,125.00 $ 1,125.00 100% $ 100% $13,284.25 $2,675,918.66 $ - $ 6,232.40 Page 2 Monticello -Pay $ - $ 50,000.00 $ - $ 1,000.00 - $ - $ 542,275.00 0.23 $ 22,927.00 $ 100,000.00 0.09 $ 901.68 $ 30,000.00 $ - $ - 1,400.00 $ - $ 2,000.00 $ - $ 200.00 $ 23,828.68 $ 726,875.00 1 $ - $ 63,671.00 $ (41,519.94) $ (41,519.94) 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100°x° 100% 0% 1,457.40 275.00 1,000.00 2,375.00 $5,107.40 1,125.00 $ 1,125.00 100% $ 100% $13,284.25 $2,675,918.66 $ - $ 6,232.40 Page 2 Monticello -Pay City Council Agenda: 09/25/17 2G. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2017-68 declaring costs to be assessed, ordering preparation of assessment roll and calling for an Assessment Hearing on October 23, 2017 to adopt assessments for the 2017 Street Reconstruction and Utilitv Improvement Proiect , City Proiect No. 16C003, for Hart Boulevard and Sandberg Road (SB) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The 2017 Street and Utility Project is currently under construction along Hart Boulevard and construction on Sandberg Road is planned to commence the week of September 25. The improvements are anticipated to be completed by the time of the proposed assessment hearing date of October 23, 2017. The project also included improvements on Gillard Avenue, 95th Street, Haug Avenue, 90th Street and Mississippi Drive, whereas the assessment hearing will take place on October 9, 2017. A public hearing was held for the project on February 27, 2017 prior to final design, bidding, and construction of the project. A preliminary assessment roll was presented at the public hearing for the project in accordance with Minnesota Statute 429. Now that construction is planned to be substantially complete and an estimate of final costs can be provided, a final assessment roll is being presented at this time for consideration. Wright County requires that assessments be certified to the County Auditor by November 30, 2017 for collection with 2018 property taxes. This deadline can be met by calling for the assessment hearing to be held at the October 23, 2017 City Council meeting and providing time for the 30 day appeal period. By conducting the assessment hearing on October 23, adequate time for publication and mailing of notices will be provided to satisfy the requirements for public improvement projects in accordance with Minnesota State Statutes Chapter 429. The assessment methodology proposed is the same as described at the public hearing for the project. Non-residential properties are proposed to be assessed at the actual front -foot street reconstruction rate based on their current use. This applies to properties along Hart Boulevard and Sandberg Road. These rates are based on assessing 100% of the per foot actual cost for the each project area, which is consistent with past practice. The mill and overlay areas along Hart Boulevard (where is parallels CSAH 75) are proposed to be assessed by the front foot rate with assessing 50% of the project cost. Only 50% of the project is proposed to be assessed due to the fact that there are properties fronting only one side of the roadway City Council Agenda: 09/25/17 There are a few several non-residential properties throughout the project that staff and the City attorney would recommend be assessed as follows: • The assessments for the Macarlund Plaza townhomes located on a private drive but with access from Hart Boulevard (East) are proposed to be distributed equally and individually per unit based on the frontage on Hart Boulevard. The proposed assessment per unit is $305. There are 30 units. • The current residential property use (#52) along Hart Boulevard (East) is proposed to be assessed 50% of the proposed mill and overlay rate at $1,400. If the property is rezoned or redevelops prior to any future street improvements, it is proposed to assess the property the remaining 50% of the assessment. The current residential property uses (#9/10 and #11- Bondhus properties) along Hart Boulevard (West) are proposed to be assessed 50% of the proposed mill and overlay rate, instead of the reconstruction rate. Due to the watermain upsizing, the roadway needs to be reconstructed. If the watermain did not need to be upsized, this section of roadway would only be in need of a mill and overlay improvement. The Bondhus property is proposed to be assessed at the mill and overlay rate of $1,440 per dwelling unit, instead of the single family residential reconstruction rate of $4,600. In order to replace the watermain, the roadway needs to be reconstructed. If the watermain did not need to be replaced, this section of roadway would only be in need of a mill and overlay improvement. For these reasons, the City attorney recommends assessing the properties at the mill and overlay rate. • In addition, one of the Bondhus properties (PID 155011000052) consists of a duplex, therefore, two units will be assessed totaling $2,880. This is consistent with the City's policy and past practice. The assessment is proposed at a 10 -year term not to exceed a 5.0% interest rate. The 2017A series bond sale will occur on September 21, 2017 after which time the final interest rate will be determined. The final interest rate will be presented at the Council meeting on September 25, 2017. Al. Budget Impact: The estimated final project costs for the entire project totals $2,000,000. This cost includes construction costs, contingency and indirect costs. The total proposed assessments is $220,509.56 for non -City owned properties adjacent to Hart Boulevard and Sandberg Road. This project is proposed to be funded using the future 2017A issuance of street reconstruction and improvement bonds that will be presented to the Council on September 25, 2017. Capital improvement funds, utility funds, and special assessments to benefitting properties will be used for debt service payments. 2 City Council Agenda: 09/25/17 A2. Staff Workload Impact: Impacts to staff workload are routine for this process and include the required mailings and notices to the benefitting properties. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to adopt Resolution #2017-68 declaring costs to be assessed, ordering preparation of assessment roll, and calling for the assessment hearing for October 23, 2017, to adopt assessments for the 2017 Street Reconstruction and Utility Improvement Project, City Project No. 16CO03 for Hart Boulevard and Sandberg Road. 2. Motion to deny adoption of Resolution #2017-68 at this time. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends Alternative 1. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Resolution #2017-68 B. Draft Final Assessment Roll and Maps CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2017-68 DECLARING COSTS TO BE ASSESSED, ORDERING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT ROLL, AND CALLING FOR AN ASSESSMENT HEARING TO ADOPT AN ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE 2017 STREET RECONSTRUCTION AND UTILITY PROJECT, CITY PROJECT NO. 16C003, FOR HART BOULEVARD AND SANDBERG ROAD WHEREAS, contracts have been let and the project is currently under construction and is planned to be substantially complete on Hart Boulevard and Sandberg Road and includes street reconstruction, curb and gutter; storm sewer, sanitary *ewer and water supply systems; signage and other necessary appurtenant work* 41kk WHEREAS, the total costs of thf NOW THEREFORE BE IT HE OF MONTICELLO, MINNES( 3 M The City Council hereby property owners based up )F THE CITY .inst benefitted :ion. The City Administrator shall forthvv calculate the proper'Wount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land without regard to cash valuation as provided by law, and he shall file a copy of such proposed assessm his office- for public inspection. A hearing shall be held on the 23rd day of Oder, 2017 at 6:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers at the Monticello Community Center to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place allons owning property affected by such improvement will b ven an opportunity toNard with reference to such assessment. The City is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment t published once in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing and shall state in the notice the total cost of the improvement. The Clerk shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to the hearing. 5. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment to the City, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of the assessment. Payment of the balance in whole must be made before November 27, 2017, or interest will be charged through December 31" of the succeeding year for the first year's portion of the assessment. In subsequent years, the property owner may at any time thereafter, pay to the City the balance of the assessment remaining unpaid after the current year, provided such payment is made prior to November 151H 6. The City Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certification of this assessment to the county auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the county. Such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. ADOPTED BY the Monticello City Council this 25th day of September, 2017. CITY OF MONTICELLO Brian Stumpf, Mayor ATTEST: Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator Preliminary Assessment Roll - Sandberg Road Date ' 9m0/26117 . � . . . . PITY OF MONTICELLO, WRIGHT C2UN'�Y, MIN ESOTA RESIDENTIAL NON R ESICENTIAL TOTAL PR -No- F&_E4fiFid4Ti6N—W6. PROPERTY OWNER SLE- E� (PID) ADDRESS UNITS FRONt'F OT 155027002030 JDJ PROPERTIES LLC 1213 SANDBERG RD, MONTICELLO, MIN Sr, -%2 0.71 143 3 1213 SANDBERG RD, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 0.35 '128 $ 109.291 S 38.25 S 113.289 12 41 155500142203 KMRE LLC 11401 FALLON AVE NE, MONTICELLO, MIN 55362 0.93 Ina $ 109.29 1 $ 101.64 S 10,929.00 71 15502700.10411CHIMOS EOUITIES LLC 13915 74TH ST, CLEAR LAKE, MN 55319 1 0.52 113 S 09 $ %.83 $ 12.349.77 8 1550270D1031 CHIMOS EQUITIES LLC 13915 74TH ST, CLEAR LAKE, MN 55319 1 0.09 20 $ 1109 29 S 9.84 $ 2,185,80 �orn: *5 hAs arc -At, well as Marvin Road, btd does not have frordogq on Sandberg Road; therefore, the pa"I is not Proposed to be assessed TOTAL 341 t, 94.426.56 Preliminary Assessment Roll - Hart Boulevard (West) Street Improvements - Reconstruction 2017 STREET R CITY OF MONTICELLO, WRIGHT COUNTY, �0 RESIDENTIAL NON RESIDENTIAL I—TOTAL STREET N PROPOSED WIDI ADDRESS _. U NITS_|__cETOTAL K:10250-6-3(10\AdminIDocsNAsses.5menisIFinaI Draft Assessment Roll 092017 Hart Sandberg Preliminary Assessment Roll Hart Boulru (East) - Mill and Overlay K.,102596-WOI,Admin\Dom)A,;."ssm-nl,nkF!naI Draft Asnessment Roll 092017 Hart Sandberg ' . Mate 9/2at2017 RESIDENTIAL NON RESIDENTIAL TOTAL (PID) ANCIAR SI TI 01 STREET ATIt 4 �E§ TC TAL -P-.v-76 Iftio Owner Marne 6DDRESS Portv FR, FOOTAGE 3E FRONTFOOT 521 155011000010 HOGLUND,STEVEN G & THOMAS E 1501 BROADWAY E, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 80 $18.00's 1,440.00 3.161 54' $1,440.00' 531 155037001010 KEAN OF MONTICELLO INC PO BOX 564, MAPLE LAKE, MN 55358 192 279 36.00 551 155037001030 DAHLHEIMER,DERORAH C REV TRUST PO BOX 2S4, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 $10,044.00 $10,044.00 11303 CYPRESS LN W, ANNANDALE, MN 55302 0,51 106 $ 36.00 S3.816,00 $3,816.00 591 1550370010601MARDOT PROPERTIES LLC 1-3020 W TOPEKA DR, PEORIA, AZ SS382 022 126 S 36,00 $4,536.00 $4,536.00 TOTAL 6.21 (56500 Preliminary'Assessment Roll - Hart Boulevard (East) - Reconstruction Date COUNT ESOTA .MN CITY PROJECT NO. 160003 RESIDENTIAL NON RESIDENTIAL -'N�Md. "OROPERTY OWNER PROPERTY MAILING TI T PROPOSED f0`161 ADDRESS !k§-Sg�� SME�NT S4 ISS037001020 RIVERVIEW PROP PARTNERSHIP PO BOX 6124, ST CLOUD, MN 56302 1 1.29 164' S 00 $10,004.00 $10,004.00 57 155037001050 MARDOT PROPERTIES LLC 9020 W TOPEKA DR, PEORIA, AZ 85382 0.48 120 $ 61' 61.00 S7.320,00 $7,320.00 58 155037001060 MARDOT PROPERTIES LLC 9020 W TOPEKA DR, PEORIA, AZ 95382 1 0,31 176 $ 61.00 $10,736.00 $10,73600 59 IS5084001010 LIBERTY SAVINGS BANK Ill TT" AVE S PO BOX 40, STCLOUD, MN 56302 1.44 250 $ 61.001 $15,250.00 $15,250.00 60 155231001010 VHM HOLDINGS LLC ISSO HART BLVD, MONTICELLO, MN S5362 1.777 551 $ 61.00 1 $33.611.00 $33.611.00 61 1550140031901 HEIKES,DARYL C 2000 VICTORY MEMORIAL DR, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55412 0.451 196 $ 61.00 1 S11,956.00 sil,kc;6.00 651 1550370070301TACKIOHN 149 RIVERVIEW DR #27, MONTICELLO, MN SS362 0.141 SIS 61-001 0A41 51 S 61,0 $305.001 S305,001 $305.00 671 $305.00 681 lSS0370080601 ERtCKSON,SHERYL 1149 RIVERVIEW DR #24, MONTICELLO, MN S5362 0.141 51 $ 61-001 $305,001 $305.00 701 lSS0370f)9D4I0j ISENORANITA 114730 BOTH ST NE, OTSEGO, MN S5330 0,141 61 $ 61.00 1 $305.001 W05.00 741 ISS0370090601 LINK,PHYLLIS 149 RIVERVIEW DR 019, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 0.141 51$ 61.00 $305,00 $305.001 $306.00 751 ISS0370090501 HELTEMESROSE M 149 RIVERVIEW DR #17, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 $305.00 791 1550370090201 HILTNER,DOLORES C 1149 RIVERVIEW DR 014, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 0,141 51S 61.00 $3 791 1 HUBER,LEROY V & KAY L 1149 RIVERVIEW DR N13, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 0.141 5)$ 61.00 $305.001 $30500 801 1550370100601SEMELSBERGER,VIRGINIA C 1149 RIVERVIEW DR #12. MONTICELLO, MN 55362 1 0.14 51 $ 61.00 $305.001 $305.00 $305.00 81 1550370100501 BERGERSONKEITH & MARI J PO BOX 1293, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 0.141 51$ 61.00 921 1550370100401 KAREN OSELL 148 RIVERVIEW DR #10, MONTICELLO, MN 5S362 $305.001 $306,00 831 1550370100301 MITCHELL, ZACHARIAN L 1149 RIVERVIEW DR #9, MONTICELLO, MN SS362 0,141 0.141 SIS 51 S 61 61.00 $30.00 1 $305.00 $305.001 S,105.00 1 S$305.001 $305,00 871 IS50370110501MURRAYAMYJ REV TRUST 19DO4 BEAMING CT, LAS VEGAS, W 89149 0. 1 41 5 $ 61.001 S S305.00 13570 WASHAKIE ST CASPER, WY 82609 0.141 51s otoo 1 $305,001 911 1550370110101ALSOLD FAMILY REVOCABLE LIVTR 149 RIVERVIEW DR 111, MONTICELLO, MN $5362 $305.00 0,141 51s 61.001 S305.01 $WS.00 TOTAL 10.04 i 1,607.00 $9 9.027.00 K.,102596-WOI,Admin\Dom)A,;."ssm-nl,nkF!naI Draft Asnessment Roll 092017 Hart Sandberg iC� ci rvoF Monticello Sandberg Road 2017 Street Improvement Project N City of Monticello, MN City Project Number: 16CO03 0 200 Feet 1 inch = 200 feet wsB Hart Boulevard CITY2017 Street Improvement Project Mo it�ello City of Monticello, MN N o 3 i Feet iYYJB City Project Number: 16CO03 1 inch = 350 feet City Council Agenda: 09/25/17 2H. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2017-69 accepting improvement and authorizing final pavment of $10,021.48 to Barber Construction for the Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park — Athletic Park Interim Improvements (SB/AS/TP) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: This project included development of approximately 20 acres of open play space, suitable for soccer, lacrosse, frisbee as part of the interim improvements for the BCOL athletic park. The improvements included grading and restoration of the site, construction of gravel parking area, paved entrance, bituminous pathway and infiltration areas. The Parks department seeded the majority of the site after grading. Construction began in August 2016 and was substantially complete in the fall of 2016. Final establishment of restoration at the entrance occurred in 2017 with final paperwork from the contractor recently submitted in order to process final payment and acceptance. The Council is being requested to accept the project as complete and approve final payment to Barber Construction in the amount of $10,021.48. The final payment request represents the final quantities completed on the contract and the release of the retainage on the contract. The final construction cost totaled $200,429.50. The original contract amount was $220,507.00 reflecting a $20,077.50 or a 10% decrease in the actual construction cost. The following paperwork was recently submitted for final payment to be released: Satisfactory showing that the contractor has complied with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes 290.92 requiring withholding state income tax (IC 134 forms). 2. Evidence in the form of an affidavit that all claims against the contractor by reasons of the contract have been fully paid or satisfactorily secured (lien waivers). 3. Consent of Surety to Final Payment certification from the contractor's surety. 4. Two-year maintenance bond. It should be noted that the maintenance bond will start and extend two years from the date of final acceptance of the project by the City Council. Al. Budget Impact: As noted above, the final payment due to Barber Construction is $10,021.48. The Parks Department costs for seeding the 20 -acre site was estimated amount at $18,500, which includes labor, seed, fertilizer, equipment, and fuel. Therefore the total construction cost $218,929.50. City Council Agenda: 09/25/17 The City budgeted $200,000 within the Parks Department 2016 budget for completion of the improvements. Any additional costs were funded from the Closed Bond Fund. The Finance Director has indicated that there are adequate funds to finance the difference between budgeted amount and project cost. A2. Staff Workload Impact: Impacts to staff workload are minimal and routine for the project. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Consideration of Resolution 2017-69 accepting improvement and authorizing final payment of $10,021.48 to Barber Construction for the Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park — Athletic Park Interim Improvements. 2. Motion deny Resolution 2017-69 at this time. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends Alternative #1. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Resolution #2017-69 B. Letter of recommendation C. Construction Pay Voucher No. 3 (Final) 2 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2017-69 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING IMPROVEMENTS AND AUTHORIZING FINAL PAYMENT OF $10,021.48 TO BARBER CONSTRUCTION FOR THE BERTRAM CHAIN OF LAKES REGIONAL PARK — ATHLETIC PARK INTERIM IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, pursuant to a written contract with the City of Monticello, Barber Construction was awarded the Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park — Athletic Park Interim Improvements NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOL VED BY THE CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA that the work completed under said contract is hereby accepted and Clerk are hereby directed to issue a proper order for the final receipt of the following: A 1) Satisfactory showing that the contractor has 290.92 requiring withholding state income t 2) Evidence in the form of an affidavit that all cl contract have been fully paid or satisfactorily 3) Consent of Surety to Final Payment certification 4) Two year maintenance bond to e,, City Council. 119% ADOPTED BY the Monticello City ( ATTEST: ed and that the Mayor and City on such contract subject to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes F34); 14 against the contractor by reasons of the V(lie vers); 1% :m ontractor's surety; Jennifer Schreiber, City Clerk acceptance of the project by the ber, 2017. :ITY OF MONTICELLO Brian Stumpf, Mayor ■ WSB 701 Xenia Avenue South I Suite 300 1 Minneapolis, MN 55416 1 (763) 541-4800 September 20, 2017 Ms. Jennifer Schreiber City Clerk City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1 Monticello, MN 55362 Re: Construction Pay Voucher No. 3 (Final) and Final Project Documents BCOL Athletic Complex Interim Improvements City of Monticello Project No. 16CO01 WSB Project No. 2596-110 Dear Ms. Schreiber: Please find enclosed Construction Pay Voucher No. 3 and final (in triplicate) in the amount of $10,021.48 for the above -referenced project. The final payment request represents the release of the retainage on the contract. We recommend that the City of Monticello approve Construction Pay Voucher No. 3 and final for Barber Construction, Inc. at the September 25, 2017, City Council meeting. Enclosed is the documentation required for releasing final payment for the above -referenced project as listed below: 1. Satisfactory showing that the contractor has complied with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes 290.92 requiring withholding state income tax (IC134 forms). 2. Evidence in the form of an affidavit that all claims against the contractor by reasons of the contract have been fully paid or satisfactorily secured (lien waivers). 3. Consent of Surety to Final Payment certification from the contractor's surety. 4. Two-year maintenance bond. This project will be considered for acceptance by the City Council on September 25, 2017. The maintenance period will be in effect from September 26, 2017, until September 26, 2019. Please contact me at (763) 512-5257 if you have any questions. Thank you. Sincerely, WSB & Associates, Inc. Eric M. Eckman, PE Project Manager Enclosures cc: Sarah Rathlisberger, City of Monticello Shibani Bisson, WSB & Associates, Inc. Jake Barber, Barber Construction, Inc. srb Building a legacy —your legacy. Equal Opportunity Employer I wsbeng.com K.102596-1101AdminlConstruction AdminIPay Vouchersl2596-110 CST LTR VO 3 FNL CTYj schreiber-092017.docx CITY OF MONTICELLO 505 Walnut St Monticello, MN 55362-1147 Project 02596-11 - MONT - Bertram Ch of Lakes Athletic Complex MP Final Pay Voucher No. 3 Contractor: Barber Construction Co., Inc. 4350 Main Street St. Bonifacious, MN 55375 Contract Amounts Original Contract $220,507.00 Contract Changes $0.00 Revised Contract $220,507.00 Work Certified To Date Base Bid Items $200,429.50 Backsheet $0.00 Change Order $0.00 Supplemental Agreement $0.00 Work Order $0.00 Material On Hand $0.00 Total $200,429.50 Contract No. Vendor No. na For Period: 10/7/2016 - 8/23/2017 Warrant # Date Funds Encumbered Original $220,507.00 Additional N/A Total $220,507.00 Work Certified Work Certified Less Amount Less Previous Amount Paid Total Amount This Pay Voucher To Date Retained Payments This Pay Voucher Paid To Date 02596-11 $0.00 $200,429.50 $0.00 $190,408.02 $10,021.48 $200,429.50 Percent Retained: 0% Amount Paid This Final Pay Voucher ( $10,021.481 I hereby certify that a Final Examination has been made of the noted Contract, that the Contract has been completed, that the entire amount of Work Shown in this Final Voucher has been performed and the Total Value of the Work Performed in accordance with, and pursuant to, the terms of the Contract is as shown in this Final Voucher. Approved By Approved By Barber Construction Co., Inc. County/City%Project Engineer. Contractor IZ'Co%j ,R�°►�(Q� 2 September 6, 2017 Date Construction Obsery OR//q/17 Date •-20 Date City of Monticello Date Page 1 02596-11 Pavment Summary No. From Date To Date 1 07/25/2016 09/01/2016 2 09/02/2016 10/06/2016 3 10/07/2016 08/23/2017 Totals: 02596-11 Fundina Cateaory Report Work Certified Per Pay Voucher $150,545-50 $49,884.00 $0.00 $200,429.50 Funding Work Less Category Certified Amount No. To Date Retained UNF 200,429.50 0.00 Totals: $200,429.50 $0.00 02596-11 Fundina Source Resort Accounting Funding Amount Paid No. Source This Pay Voucher UNF Unfunded 10,021.48 Totals: $10,021.48 CITY OF MONTICELLO 505 Walnut St Monticello, MN 55362-1147 Project No. 02596-11 Final Pay Voucher No. 3 Amount Retained Per Pay Voucher $7,527.28 $2,494.20 ($10,021.48) Less Previous Payments 190,408.02 $190,408.02 Revised Contract Amount 220,507.00 $220,507.00 $0.00 Amount Paid This Pay Voucher 10,021.48 $10,021.48 Funds Encumbered To Date 220,507.00 $220,507.00 Amount Paid Per Pay Voucher $143,018.22 $47,389.80 $10,021.48 $200,429.50 Total Amount Paid To Date 200,429.50 $200,429.50 Paid To Contractor To Date 200,429.50 $200,429.50 Page 2 CITY OF MONTICELLO 505 Walnut St Monticello, MN 55362-1147 Project No. 02596-11 Final Pay Voucher No. 3 102596-11 Proiect Material Status Page 3 Quantity Amount Line Item Description Units Unit Contract This This Quantity Amount Price Quantity Pay Pay To Date To Date Voucher Voucher SCHEDULE A - SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS I1 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LS $7,500.00 1 0 $0.00 1 $7,500.00 Ij 2 2101.501 CLEARING ACRE $1,000.00 1.5 0 $0.00 1.5 $1,500.00 13 2101.506 GRUBBING ACRE $1,000.00 1.5 0 $0.00 1.5 $1,500.00 4 2105.501 COMMON EXCAVATION (EV) C Y $8.00 3800 0 $0.00 3800 $30,400.00 5 2105.523 COMMON BORROW (CV) C Y $16.00 2000 0 $0.00 2499 $39,984.00 6 2211.501 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 TON $27.00 2100 0 $0.00 1636 $44,172.00 BITUMINOUS 7 2357.502 MATERIAL FOR GAL $10.00 30 0 $0.00 2 $20.00 TACK COAT TYPE SP 9.5 8 2360.501 WEARING TON $120.00 16 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 COURSE MIX (2,B) TYPE SP 12.5 9 2360.501 WEARING TON $130.00 22 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 COURSE MIX (2,B) TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING 10 2360.503 COURSE Yo $23.00 2350 0 $0.00 2168 $49,864.00 MIXTURE (2,B) 3.0" THICK 11 12501.511 12" CS CULVERT PIPE LF $45.00 I 30 I 0 $0.00 I 301 $1,350.00 18" RC PIPE 12 12501.511 CULVERT CLASS LF $68.00 64 0 $0.00 64 $4,352.00 V 1 13 12501.515 12" CS PIPE EACH $200.00 1 2 I 0 $0.001 21 $400.00 14 12501.515 18" RCPIPE APRO115 EACH $1,500.00 21 0 $0.001 21 $3,000.00 12573.502 TYPE FENCE, MS LF $2.25 1750 I 0 $0.00 I 1750 I $3,937.50 SEDIMENT 16 2573.533 CONTROL LOG LF $2.00 1250 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 TYPE STRAW 17 12575.501 SEEDING ACRE $2,000.001 4.25 0 $0.001 41 $8,000.00 18 12575.502 25 EDIMIXTURE LB $2.50 I 915 0 $0.00 700 $1,750.00 19 12575.502 SEED MIXTURE 33-262 LB $20.00 I 10 I 0 $0.00 10 $200.00 RAPID 20 12575.572 STABILIZATION S Y $2.50 400 0 $0.00 200 $500.00 METHOD 4 Page 3 CITY OF MONTICELLO 505 Walnut St Monticello, MN 55362-1147 Project No. 02596-11 Final Pay Voucher No. 3 02596-11 Project Material Status Quantity Amount Line Item Description Units Unit Contract This This Quantity Amount Price Quantity Pay Pay To Date To Date Voucher Voucher 21 2575.605 MULCH MATERIAL ACRE $1,000.00 4.25 0 $0.00 2 $2,000.00 TYPE 1 Totals For SCHEDULE A - SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS: 1 $0.001 1 $200,429.50 Project Totals: 1 $0.00 1$200,429.501 Page 4 City Council Agenda 09/25/17 2I. Consideration of adopting Ordinance 681 amending the Fee Schedule by adding Small Wireless Facilitv fee and collocation fees to Right-of-Wav Permit section of Fee Schedule A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The purpose of this ordinance amendment is to add a Small Wireless Facility Fee of $45 and collocation fees under Engineering/Right-of-Way permits. This ordinance amendment is partnered with the approval of the Right -of -Way Ordinance being discussed under the Regular Agenda. The fee is intended to cover the costs of reviewing a standard Small Wireless Facility Permit. For permits requesting collocation on a city structure (i.e. street light pole), a separate collocation agreement will be required which will result in a $1500 escrow for reviewing the application, drafting the agreement and construction inspection. Additional fees as allowed by law, to be included in the collocation agreement are as follows: • $150 per year for rent to occupy space on a wireless support structure • $25 per year for maintenance of the wireless support structure • A monthly fee for electricity used to operate the facility, if not purchased directly from the utility, at the rate set forth by statute. Al. Budget Impact: No appreciable impact on budget resulting from the changes as proposed. There is a minor cost for publication. A2. Staff Workload Impact: NA B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to adopt Ordinance 681 amending the 2017 Fee Schedule to add the Small Wireless Facility fee pending approval of the Right -of -Way ordinance that follows later in the meeting. 2. Motion to modify Ordinance 681 at this time with the following revisions C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff supports Alternative #1. Upon approval, the changes will be published in the Monticello Times. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Draft Ordinances 681 B. Draft Fee Schedule Excerpt ORDINANCE NO. 681 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE 2017 FEE SCHEDULE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO ORDAINS: Section 1. The Fee Schedule category, Engineering — Right -of -Way Permits, of the Monticello City Code shall be amended as follows: Small Wireless Facility Fee $45 Collocation Fees Escrow — document review $1,500 Wireless Support Structure Rent $150/year Wireless Support Structure Maintenance $25/year * Fee to cover actual electricity costs needed to operate the small wireless facility, unless purchased directly from utility. Section 4. This Ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and publication according to law. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Monticello this 25`x' day of September, 2017. CITY OF MONTICELLO Brian Stumpf, Mayor ATTEST: Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator VOTING IN FAVOR: VOTING IN OPPOSITION: Planned Unit Developments (PUDs): Public ROW or Easement Vacation Rezoning Request: Simple Subdivision/Administrative Lot Combination/ Lot Line Adjustment Wetland Delineation Review Special Home Occupation Permits: Special Planning Commission Meeting Temporary Use Permit (waived for parades only) Variance: Single Family - Aplication Fee - Deposit All Other Applications - Application Fee - Deposit Concept: $200 + escrow (per chart) Development: $200 + escrow (per chart) JFinal: $50 + escrow (per chart) $200 + Escrow (per chart) $200 + Escrow (per chart) $200 + Escrow (per chart) $50 application fee/$500 escrow $200 + Escrow (per chart) $350 $50 $200 $500 $200 $1,000 NOTE: When multiple land use applications are ran concurrently, only one application fee and escrow deposit shall be required per meeting cycle, until escrow is depleted. New escrow required per escrow chart once depleted. ENGINEERING Driveway Permit GPS Locate Fee (New subdivisions) Grading Permit: Existing Single -Family Residential New Single -Family Residential Development, Multi -Dwelling, Commercial & Industrial Properties Land Reclamation/Mining Permit (requires subdivision development agreement or CUP) Public Improvement Security $30 $30 $60/unit $75 per permit + $1,500/acre restoration surety bond. No drainage calculation review required: $150 per permit plus restoration surety bond of $3000/first acre; $1500 each additional acre. Drainage calculation review required: $350 per permit plus restoration surety bond of $3000/first acre; $1500 each additional acre. Fee determined by City Council resolution + 100% of land restoration costs as determined by City Engineer Letter of credit or cash based on statement of construction cost of improvements x 125% Right -of -Way Permits Drops - no drawing required unless origination occurs more than 10 feet from property to be served: Fee w/out drawings $30/25 addresses (maximum) Fee with drawings $30/5 addresses with drawings (maximum) Permit Extension Fee: $20.00 Pavement Hole Fee: $55 Trunk Line Fee: Base Fee (first 100 feet) $45 Trenching (over 100 feet) $.10/final foot Boring (over 100 feet) $.05/final foot Obstruction Fee: $45 Small Wireless Facility Permit Fee $45 Collocation Fees Escrow - document review $1,500 Wireless Support Structure Rent $150/year Wireless Support Structure Maintenance $25/year *Fee to cover actual electricity costs needed to operate the small wireless facility, unless purchased directly from utility. Monticello Fee Schedule - 2017 2J. City Council Agenda - 9/25/17 Consideration to approve an amendment to a Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development for Final Stage PUD Review of a multi -tenant commercial building in a B-3, Highwav Business District. Applicant: Larson, Andv/Crown Bav (AS) Property: 110 Chelsea Road Lot 6, Block 1, Monticello Travel Center 2nd Addition Planning Case Number: 2017-021 A. REFERENCE & BACKGROUND Request(s): Deadline for Decision: Land Use Designation: Zoning Designation: Current Site Use: Surrounding Land Uses: North: East: South: West: Project Description. Amendment to a Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development for Final Stage PUD approval to accommodate the development of a 4,942 square foot multiple tenant retail building in the B-3 District. August 4th, 2017, applicant provided extension request to September 25th, 2017. Places to Shop (Comprehensive Plan) B-3, Highway Business District Vacant Mixed Use - Convenience Retail/Motor Fuel Commercial Lodging Multi -tenant Commercial Retail Convenience Retail/Motor Fuel Proposed Use. As noted in the Development Stage application, the applicants propose a mix of commercial tenants, including retail sales and services as allowed by the B-3 Zoning District, with the specific request that commercial office uses (allowed by Conditional Use Permit in the B-3) would be included in the initial approval. Commercial and professional office uses are compatible with the proposed B-3 retail activities, and are present in other parts of the Travel Center complex. Parking requirements are similar, and no conflicts are foreseen. For other potential tenants, the City Council Agenda — 9/25/17 applicants will be required to comply with the City's change of use permitting as tenants change over time, to ensure zoning compliance and compatibility. The current proposal is for PUD Final Stage review. The project underwent Development Stage review previously. The City Council approved the Development Stage PUD request on July 24th, 2017, subject to conditions as reviewed below. PUD Final Stage - Site Plan Review 1. Proposed Tenants include those listed in the B-3 District as Permitted Uses, in addition to commercial and/or professional office space (a Conditional Use in the B-3 District). This is an on-going condition assigned to the PUD and will be recorded in the CUP proceedings. 2. The applicants complete Change of Use process requirements as tenants change to verify continued compliance with zoning requirements. This is an on-going condition assigned to the PUD and will be recorded in the CUP proceedings. 3. Verification of executed cross -parking and access agreements within the Travel Center PUD. The applicant has provided the required documentation for City review. 4. Verification that lighting fixtures meet the requirements of the zoning ordinance as specified in this report. This condition has not yet been addressed on the revised photometric plan and is a required condition of approval. 5. Compliance with comments from the City Engineer in the Engineer's letter dated June 5th, 2017. The City Engineer has indicated that prior comments have been addressed with the exception of two items, which are conditions of final stage approval. 6. Payment of required development charges and submission of required landscaping security. This is an on-going condition assigned to the PUD and will be recorded in the CUP proceedings. 2 City Council Agenda — 9/25/17 7. Other comments of the Planning Commission and Staff provided at the Public Hearing. None. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS 1. Motion to approve an amendment to Conditional Use Permit for Final Stage PUD, based on the findings in Resolution No. 2017-71, and contingent on compliance with the conditions listed in Exhibit Z. 2. Motion to deny an amendment to Conditional Use Permit for Final Stage PUD, based on findings identified by the City Council 3. Motion to table action. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends Alternative 1, approval of the Final Stage CUP/PUD. The project is, with only minor notes, compliant with the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance for B-3 development. Moreover, it is consistent with the initial expectations of the original PUD approvals granted in 2005. D. SUPPORTING DATA A. Resolution 2017-71 B. Subject Site Aerial Image C. Applicant Narrative D. Applicant Plan Final Stage Submittal, including: a. Title Sheet b. Site Plan and Floor Plan C. Elevations d. Certificate of Survey e. General Notes & Specifications f. Standard Details g. Grading Plan h. SWPPP i. Utility Plan j. Paving Plan k. Landscaping Plan 1. Site Photometric Plan Z. Conditions of Approval 3 City Council Agenda — 9/25/17 EXHIBIT Z CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Conditional Use Permit/Planned Unit Development Final Stage Plan Review Lot 6, Block 1, Monticello Travel Center 1. Proposed Tenants include those listed in the B-3 District as Permitted Uses, in addition to commercial and/or professional office space (a Conditional Use in the B-3 District). 2. The applicants complete Change of Use process requirements as tenants change to verify continued compliance with zoning requirements. 3. The applicant shall provide an updated architects site plan which includes signage for service drive as required by the City Engineer. 4. The applicant shall provide a detail/spec of the proposed retaining wall. 5. Verification that lighting fixtures meet the requirements of the zoning ordinance as specified in this report. 6. Payment of required development charges and submission of required landscaping security. 2 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2017-71 APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A FINAL STAGE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR CROWN BAY, LLC LOT 6, BLOCK 1, MONTICELLO TRAVEL CENTER 2nd ADDITION WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted a request to develop its property along Oakwood Drive and Cedar Street, Lot 6, Block 1, Monticello Travel Center 2nd Addition; and WHEREAS, the applicant concurrently proposes to develop roperty for commercial uses; and WHEREAS, the site is guided for commercial uses under the label "Places to Shop" in the City's Comprehensive Plan; and 14 L WHEREAS, the proposed PUD, is consistent with the long-term use and development of the property for commercial uses; and 4 WHEREAS, the proposed project is consistent with the original intent for the Monticello Travel Center; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commissi n held a public hearing on July 11, 2017 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed and approved the Development Stage Planned Unit Development for the proposed amendment to Monditional use permit for planned unit developm"aw 24th, 2017; and 1 WHEREAS, the applicant has revised and submitted Final Stage PUD plans in accordance with the Development Stage PUD, and IL WHEREA City Council has con sued all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporatelWreference i,Wp the resolution; and WHEREAS, the Cit the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the appro The PUD provides an appropriate means of furthering the intent of the Comprehensive Plan for the site by constructing a proposed building for commercial use. 2. The proposed improvements on the site under the Development Stage PUD are consistent with the needs of the PUD in this location as a commercial area. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2017-71 3. The improvements will have expected impacts on public services, including sewer, water, stormwater treatment, and traffic which have been planned to serve the property for the development as proposed. 4.. The PUD flexibility for the project, including parcels with cross access and parking, as well as joint signage, are consistent with the intent of the City's economic development objectives, as well as with the intent of the original approved PUD plans. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the CityCo of the City of Monticello, Minnesota: The Monticello City Council hereby approves the Final Stage PUD for Lot 6, Block 1, Monticello Travel Center 2nd Addition, subject to the related codes and regulations for such use, and the following conditions: 1. Proposed Tenants include those listed in the B-3 District as Pe d Uses, in addition to commercial and/or professional office space (a Conditi Use in the B-3 District). f 2. The applicants complete Change of Use process equirements as tenants change to verify continued compliance with zoning requireme 3. The applicant shall provide an updated architects sitNpnIa hich includes signage for service drive as required by the City,Engineer. 4 4. The applicant shall provide a detail/spec he proposed retaining wall. rification t4at lighting fixtures meet th 0 requirements of the zoning ordinance as cified in this report. 6. Paf required development charges and submission of required landscaping securiVEIL Monticello, Minnesota: ATTEST: Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator of September, 2017, by the City Council of the City of MONTICELLO LOW 2 Brian Stumpf, Mayor Larson Building, Inc. -Request for Amdt. to Conditional Use Permit for Devel. Stage PUD Created by: City of Monticello Lot 6, Block 1 Monticello Travel Center 2nd Addition 1155-202-001060 & 155-202-001061 September 7, 2017 To: Community Development Director, City of Monticello, MN To Whom It May Concern: Crown Bay LLC, fee title property owner of Lot 6, Block 1, Monticello Travel Center 2nd Addition, petitions on behalf of Crown Bay LLC, for a CUP/PUD Final Stage Amendment. The Monticello City Council adopted Resolution No. PC -2017-017 recommending approval of the amendment to Conditional Use Permit for PUD, based on findings in said resolution, and contingent on compliance with the conditions listed in Exhibit Z. Crown Bay LLC understands the conditions listed in Exhibit Z and to the extent possible at this time is submitting supporting and revised documents in compliance with those conditions. Thank You. Crown Bay, LLC Robert LaMont, Chief Manager, CROWN BAY RETAIL BUILDING PUD FINAL STAGE PLAN - SEPTEMBER 20, 2017 110 OAKWOOD AVE E MONTICELLO, MN 55362 TS ,l�'. f � �� v Ms5r5sfQpi RivM l�`P Cello Cc,.n;ry i:lub � � ivff G --Rd G°If Course Rd GGlf Course Rq T g Monticello er Rlspr �u37 zi yr, .. warn s7 S� �;r • / 7. �� PTonticello 's � f v �� —`� aCommunlFy Genler = � e q'a.r 6}w _ t,� rS 54� d, l Q moon maompons centroCt cit FooaaO ;b5, 3' ••� Y,t a Va r`4d.� .,o v.9` 1 pay stationat9res - a a ,xd CtN Dundas Rd Dundas Rd Dundas Rd Dundaa Rd -Rein Rlver Llry EMtre 25 Dr eQ mead o m d Fa N T n OAE00Michaels m m Blvtl �� Fl rin9&Design � � m R'hcal 9�rd o school t;,.. DRAWING INDEX r. AERIAL - ■r. r"' T1 TITLE SHEET SH 1 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY CIVIL 1/ WTIM C1 GENERAL NOTES & SPECIFICATIONS C2 STANDARD DETAILS C3 GRADING PLAN C4 SWPPP - NOTES C5 SWPPP - STANDARD DETAILS C6 SWPPP - PLAN VIEW C7 UTILITY PLAN C8 PAVING PLAN CL1 LANDSCAPE PLAN ARCHITECTURAL Al SITE PLAN & FLOOR PLAN A2 ELEVATIONS ELECTRICAL E1.1 SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN CONTACTS OWNER CROWN BAY LLC 2435 BARTON AVE NW BUFFALO, MN 55313 P H . 763.682.3790 CONTACT. ROBERT LAMONT GENERAL CONTRACTOR LARSON BUILDING, INC. 200 1ST STREET SOUTH BUFFALO, MN 55313 P H . 763.688.5430 CONTACT. ANDY LARSON ARCHITECT STONE TENT ARCHITECTURE 15001 140TH ST FORESTON, MN 56330 PH. 612.508.8099 CONTACT. ERIK JOHNSON CIVIL SCHULTZ ENGINEERING & SITE DESIGN 18 SOUTH RIVERSIDE AVENUE SUITE 230 SARTELL, MN 56377 P H . 320.339.0669 CONTACT. BRIAN SCHULTZ 1 106101*9001 ARCHITECTURE © 2017 STONE TENT ARCHITECTURE, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED This drawing is an instrument of service and is the sole property of Stone Tent Architecture, any use of this drawing without written consent by Stone Tent Architecture is prohibited. The architect shall not have control or charge of and shall not be responsible for construction means, methods, deviations, techniques, sequences or procedures, or for safety precautions and programs in connection with the work, for the acts or omissions of the contractor, subcontractors or any other persons performing any of the work, or for the failure of any of them to carry out the work in accordance with the contract documents. Always use dimensions as shown. Drawings are not to be scaled. Drawing scales as indicated are for reference only and are not intended to accurately depict actual or designed conditions. Written dimensions shall govern. 15001 140th st foreston, min 56330 ph. 612.508.8099 erik@stonetentarchitecture.com stonetentarchitecture.com CARSON BUILDf NG No. Date Appr Revision Notes 1 6/5/17 ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL 2 6/20/17 REVISED SUBMITTAL 3 9/20/17 REVISED SUBMITTAL No. Date Issue Notes z O 1 hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared U by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. zSignature O U M O Architect ~ O Erik P. Johnson ZRegistration 50962 T Date 0 SEPTEMBER 20, 2017 NNT V Project Title O CROWN BAY z RETAIL BUILDING g in WProject ID 1020 Q J QSheet Title LL TITLE SHEET QSheet No. i! 16'-0" I I I I I II I I 16'-0.. I- I �I I I... ----------- I I I I I I i i I ii I L.�.—.—._._._._._.-._1_._. I _I_ _.J._.I_._._.I i —�-�nL zo o SII I I I I I ;I I I j .I I I i t SII I I i l o I I i I' ii TENANT 1 TENANT 2 TENS I� , I i I, - � , O , I� , I ---------------------- ----- •----------------' I PROPOSED MECHANICAL AREA ; 42'-0" 24'-0" I 90'-0" 1 2 FLOOR PLAN Al Scale: 1/8" = V-0" CODE REVIEW NEW BUILD OCCUPANCY - M CONSTRUCTION TYPE - 2B BUILDING HEIGHTS AND AREA LIMITATIONS TABULAR = 2 STORIES / 55'/ 12,500 SF ACTUAL = 4,634 SQ FT / 1 STORY / UNSPRINKLED RESTROOM COUNT - TBD DEPENDANT ON TENANTS I I SITE SUMMARY PARCEL SIZE GROSS FLOOR AREA TOTAL IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE PROVIDED PARKING SPACES ADDL' PARKING SPACES AVAILABLE TOTAL PARKING PARKING STALL/AISLE DIMENISONS ZONING 32,723 SQ FT /.8 ACRES 4,942 SO FT 87% 28 ON SITE (INCL. 2 H.C.) 7 SPACES @ HOLIDAY SOUTH LOT I35 SPACES AVAILABLE * 9'W X 20'D / 24' AISLE B3 * 4,634 SQ FT INTERIOR FLOOR AREA X 90% = 4,170 SF / 200 SQ FT PER STALL = 20 STALLS REQUIRED -THIS REQUIREMENT WILL BE DEPENDANT ON THE ACTUAL TENANT USE. SITE PLAN N �1 Scale: 1" = 20 ft 'q 1 (010 1 a 140 1 ARCHITECTURE © 2017 STONE TENT ARCHITECTURE, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED This drawing is an instrument of service and is the sole property of Stone Tent Architecture, any use of this drawing without written consent by Stone Tent Architecture is prohibited. The architect shall not have control or charge of and shall not be responsible for construction means, methods, deviations, techniques, sequences or procedures, or for safety precautions and programs in connection with the work, for the acts or omissions of the contractor, subcontractors or any other persons performing any of the work, or for the failure of any of them to carry out the work in accordance with the contract documents. Always use dimensions as shown. Drawings are not to be scaled. Drawing scales as indicated are for reference only and are not intended to accurately depict actual or designed conditions. Written dimensions shall govern. 15001 140th st foreston, mn 56330 ph. 612.508.8099 erik@stonetentarchitecture.com stonetentarchitecture.com LAR ON 13UILDING No. Date Appr Revision Notes 1 6/5/17 ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL 2 6/20/17 REVISED SUBMITTAL 3 9/20/17 REVISED SUBMITTAL No. Date Issue Notes z O 1 hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared U by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. OSignature U Ir O LL Architect ~ Erik P. Johnson O zRegistration 50962 T Date 0 SEPTEMBER 20, 2017 CV VJ Project Title O CROWN BAY z RETAIL BUILDING n LIJ Project ID 0 1020 Q I Sheet Title II SITE PLAN QSheet No. .._._....... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... —._._....... ...... ...... ...... ...... .._._........ I I --------------------------- -------------------- ' UGNAGIE :OGNAGE: ' 74 SO FT ; 50 SQ FT --------------------............ F-- --I I I I I I II II II II II I II II II �- ------ 3 EAST ELEVATION 5-- A2 Scale: 3/16" = 1'-0" NORTH ELEVATION Scale: 3/16" = 1'-0" 1 SOUTH ELEVATION A2 Scale: 3/16" = 1'-0" 1 Date 2 ...... ...... ...... ...... -------------------- // I ------------- I x 11 I& 8 1 2 I � _,_,_,_,_,_,_ ,------------------------- ' --------------------- &IGN GE 56 SO FT ----------------- 35 SO FT ' ------------------- II II II II II II � - � . II II I......I �� 4 WEST ELEVATION A2 Scale: 3/16" = 1'-0" 14 7 ------------- SDIGMAGE ' 35 SQ FT PARAPET EL. 24'-0 PARAPET I I EL. 22'-0" -------------------------, PARAPET L. ' E 19'-4 G Nk�I ' 35 SQ FT------------- ' PIER CAP EL. 13'-4 WINDOW HEAD EL. 9'-4" WINDOW SILL SLAB i -------------------------- / --------------- ------------ ELEVATION KEY NOTES 1. EIFS (STUCCO APPEARANCE) 2. EIFS W/ PREFINISHED METAL ROOF EDGE 3. EIFS PILLAR CAP W/ PREFINISHED MTL FLASHING 4. AWNING - COLOR TO BE COORDINATED WITH TENANT BRAND 5. ROCKFACE BLOCK VENEER 6. BRICK VENEER PILLARS 7. ALUMINUM STOREFRONT WINDOWS & DOOR 8. PAINTED STEEL SUN SHADE - COLOR TO BE COORDINATED WITH TENANT BRAND 9. ROCKFACE BLOCK TRASH ENCLOSURE W/ PREFIN. MTL ROOF EDGE & PAINTED STEEL GATES 10. PAINTED HOLLOW METAL DOOR 11. ROCKFACE BLOCK VENEER PILLAR 12. PAINTED BOLLARD 13. WALL PACK LIGHT 14. DECORATIVE UP/DOWN ACCENT LIGHT SIGN SUMMARY BUILDING ELEVATION SQUARE FOOTAGE ON THE TWO STREET FRONTS = 3,100 SQ FT ALLOWABLE WALL SIGNAGE SQ FT = 15% = 465 SQ FT FREE STANDING MONUMENT SIGN - SEE 5/A2 z O U 7'-8" PREFINISHED METAL [� BACKLIT BOX SIGN BY SIGN I - MFR U) I� JI II �I z U rr O H o NOT TO EXCEED 100 SQ FT PER SIDE O L z a� ti T O \ C—) N z \ \ ROCKFACE BLOCK BASE ' l w 'R Q - - CONCRETE FOUNDATION U) I z 5 MONUMENT SIGN H A2 Scale: 3/8" = 1'-0" 0 ARCHITECTURE © 2017 STONE TENT ARCHITECTURE, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED This drawing is an instrument of service and is the sole property of Stone Tent Architecture, any use of this drawing without written consent by Stone Tent Architecture is prohibited. The architect shall not have control or charge of and shall not be responsible for construction means, methods, deviations, techniques, sequences or procedures, or for safety precautions and programs in connection with the work, for the acts or omissions of the contractor, subcontractors or any other persons performing any of the work, or for the failure of any of them to carry out the work in accordance with the contract documents. Always use dimensions as shown. Drawings are not to be scaled. Drawing scales as indicated are for reference only and are not intended to accurately depict actual or designed conditions. Written dimensions shall govern. 15001 140th st foreston, mn 56330 ph. 612.508.8099 erik@stonetentarchitecture.com stonetentarchitecture.com CARSON BUILDf NG No. Date Appr Revision Notes 1 6/5/17 ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL 2 6/20/17 REVISED SUBMITTAL 3 9/20/17 REVISED SUBMITTAL No. Date Issue Notes I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Signature Architect Erik P. Johnson Registration 50962 Date SEPTEMBER 20, 2017 Project Title CROWN BAY RETAIL BUILDING Project ID 1020 Sheet Title ELEVATIONS Sheet No. LEGEND • Found Iron Monument A Found Mag Nail ® Found Chiseled X O Set Iron Monument #41226 ID Water Gate Valve 1711 Sign ® Storm Sewer Manhole ❑ Pedestal ® Curb Stop 0 Light Pole � Fire Hydrant ❑ Catch Basin 0 Sanitary Sewer Manhole X Spot Elevation A Set Mag Nail UTILITY PIPE LEGEND (Pipe Size Type) Denotes "per city plans or record drawing" Existing Storm Sewer Existing Sanitary Sewer w Existing Watermain Electric Transformer--- 959.0 (Flow Line) At 375 SPRUCE AVENUE NORTH IIIII.- WEBB P.O. BOX 323 SURVEYING LLC MAPLE LAKE, MN 55358 1 763-898-9999 959.9 111 Sanitary Sewer Manhole -- RIM = 956.28 CER TIFICA TE OF S UR VE Y Catch Basin ,---Concrete Curb RIM = 955.90 .---Storm Sewer Manhole 956.0 RIM = 955.78 �r 956.1 r\ Coo 956.7 r\ Hefei \ \ 956.8 s�ao J a \� 956.8 Storm Sewer Manholer-- \J 00 RIM = 956.19 a \J 956.8 956.8 17, T_ ---Benchmark \ ' 1 ; / f (See Note 2) 956.7 \ \ 956.0 J \ r \ ' -' 957.2 \ \ 56.2 \ J \ J 956.6 \ ;' Concrete Curb \ J \ \° J \ 67.0' 956.6 956.9 \ I \ 956.1 C \ / r 000~e 956.3 Catch Basin \ r \ 56.2(Flow Line) 111, r Holiday Gas Station Sign RIM = 956.00 INV = 953.07 956.N Seo \ i� r 0, \ / kf n / 56.1 \ \ I \J X 56.5 r \J 957.3 70 etes�ae 6.6 G6y ti�1 r, 956.4 _ 5u6 I \J Sanitary Sewer Manhole Edge of Concrete--, oroC 956.7 O r Q \ \J RIM = 957.26 J C X., QG2� C1O1 /� r INV NW,SE = 942.26 �L n /dray -.,956.2 \ 57.1 956.6 \ \ \\ INV S = 944.26 Concrete Curb (6612) u5 \ 56.8 \ro , \ % 957.6 %��tum �. •• Storm wer b r V AJ �; .91 (15 HD r \ X956.3 / �, .,,6 , 957.6 I J \J !y 957.2 y►e�n ` tch Basin- \' \ cc 957.2 RIM = 9566 90 �8�5�� O `` INV =X53.25 Q ', O \ S 1 °0509 \ 956.8 i i 1 57.4 -7 957.2 i X 0.42 \ i� i J X 1 X 3/ \ 2�� \ oc957.5 �t v 957.5 �g 95 Vii /' ` \ ° O / X Oma\ �Sljo fest ^ \ \J \ r, i��` b� /� �, X i ID 958.4 6 S` V ao I J ❑ pQ O i •, C 7 957.2 t 6'. r \ U" -Concrete urb 6618 J and �sement 6� V A ;' ) \ 957.3 0 �7 i3 / ��' j perplat� �� V V J G° .' L56 957.1 / ^ J u ( Y ` \ \ •�. ••••'• /� �\ I 56.9 r \ 957.5 57.7 n /, / X958.7 F r / \' \� 9a. \ \ I sr \ o Lea�zn--' X Q 957.7 �� y 957.9 i ��X958.2 / 59.0 �, \. X958.7 \ r p� Catch Basin / X,_ / �, / u',. I\ 57.0(Flow Line) 957.9 / %� / \ `` \F`' • - Telephone RIM = 957.31 >( 958.6 ui�• ' •• p ^ \ \ 57.2 ` RIM Storm 957.61 Sewer Manhole <- 7.4 CO 958.3 �� 1 30' Front Setback- �� \9�'•. Manhole \ r < 958.0 ' / dge of Bitumi per Alta Survey X y INV 951.73 / / 957.6 nous ,� X \ ( ' I --Catch Basin Edge of Gravel/Dirt = 958.8 < � /' 9 / 959.2 \ UndQro�nd as pe s\. `' RIM = 957.43 958.9 J( gop qr one ma X ` ---Underground Fi er Optic a 957.9 a i X958.5 -1856 _ - - - I 9�58.� / per gopher on marks r 957.5 o r 10' Setback ` 958.8 ( \ Drainarid ljtility Easement ^ 957.3 _ _ er plat X ^ 958.2 / L - - - - Gravel/Dirt Area 20' Side Setback ....... I : X I 57.5 r i ¢-- per Alta Survey 585t \�� i O I I 958 6 /' r'r )( Drainage and Utility Easement vacated -----• -••,;, 1 I ti ? /� 959.2 �b "' Catch asin rr / 959.3 ® per City Resolution No. 2017-15 / �� h� X RIM 957.43 r 958. r / .,/ I 958 INV - 954.08 X 957.8 X959.2! C �/ X958.8 957.6 ^ r Storm Sewer Manhole r�58.3 / 959.9 n; / // )59.2 / roGirO 59.7 �� X LOT 6 �i Bituminous ce Imo: :� TDS Teleco 57 g - f RIM = 958.07 X �Ia �: Duct per go her �° J INV NE = 952.24 r _ one mark iI •0 i / ^ VN\V \ SW W=952.31Underground Electric Edge of Bitumino per gopher one marks wo �///958.5 096 ^�` 9589Line V \ r 6 Ir�tric Sin 960.4 �� _ _ ` _ _ - _ _ _ _ - / �° 8S6- - - �/V o ` / rf g X a�� \ \ /j Edge of Gravel/Dirt-' 960.5 / •� 958.5 X \ , )"-storm Sewer Manhole Q / 958.9 ', 99 Conc�te Curb (B618)--' .1 _ ��. 959. r � � X _ '\XI � I ,-c ,.,. I •,. X °� / 958.3 / v��• � RIM = 957.95 Bituminou Curb 960.3 X X9.0- 1 r 1 1 1 1 ; 1 \� ♦ o " %' ^ G 958. T 960.7 '\ - /' -1 _- T`/-1 T t 1`� T 11h: 1, N2.3�7 /• 1J°' (~r= ��i^��\��1 1 r ` x961.2\/ \•,, 9601X /'�; 9 7 ?9.. 959.2'` 1 ter- `/ r 96 °--Underground Telephone "�I / IM: I ^) �� 1 X 961.1 1 per gopher one marks li/ �: ^ QX 961.1 961.2 / / -I / I;�: \ I 8. X \ ReaSeitSack - - _ J ^ \ �� %� Z. 959.7 X960.5 I 959.5 per Alta Survey 960.3 - X X959.9 X / 960.0 I i h * I 58.4 960.0 \ ... Drainageand UtilityEasement \�� 960.6 960.8 / / \\ X9597/ O 9Q0. ` per plat 959.5 \ X � / S 83%21'22"� \ I \ ' I ' ` iyn Easement per Doc N%.,'(157614 / /19.69 E \ 960.0 959.3 59.8 60.226.10 X / / X j ro / 958 / ¢� 959.0 15.00 ! 957. X( 7 : lb<n ° 58.5 $ %o \ \� 957.1 O i A. 60.5 ?3'�2„ \ 4 Us Roaaw \ %! /x'5.3 G 958.8 ,,, \ X 2°3 ' W: • F' ay \ �,` /, 3 ' X9 6 - 'G 958.9 Par 14j-�t \ `� t. \� f i / X 960.4 kih8 43.096 Edge fB1turn no+�X\ / d e o •• ms`s ;• :Stalls : ' ; ' � � \ � ,••Water Service 959.8 959.6 �'�, ; � N 62°38'15"�W 10.10' "--' �^ per city plans � , 960.2 , ✓ rn 1 ; I958 8 Z, X c ^ , 56 8 59 � \ 1 / 59.6 ,,.. c° '-N.62° 8'15" W 21.50' '1_ _ - I 960.1 / 58 8 i r j t If' N62�\-- N 27%23'54" ; 13.09,; ' Electric � I �_- ` 8'7S,\ er _____________s N 26° 8" E ^ Sanitary Sewer F Trans former 959.6 /� $ s2a38, 11r4 j 8°7 I / / I city ty marks Service r rt9gUitan X 59.1 9 Underground Electric - 58.8 9 4 V° I / I 958.7 Concrete Curb---' per gopher one>.�arks / R•8 97 ^ / I •c 24" Surmountable Curb-- 9 .Q \\ Q• X Sanitary Sewer Manhole -- / a 58'9 ® RIM = 959.62-- 959 2 'Edge o W %> > �> 59.0(Flow Line) / Concrete Curb- -I / (6618)/X959.3 // I �/ 958.9 / / 1 / 1 / Sanitary Sewer Manhole RIM = 959.41 ^ / INV N = 945.11 I ,---Catch Basin RIM = 958.95 /Catch Basin - RIM = 958.97 Storm Sewer Manhole--:� RIM = 959.41 ` RCpJ Storm Sewer Manhole INV = 953.24 / RIM = 959.16 CLIENT: Andy Larson Larson Building, Inc. 3 Hwy 55 West Buffalo, MN 55313 PROJECT LOCATION: 110 Oakwood Ave E Monticello, MN 55362 PID NI 155202001060 & 155202001061 ch Basin I = 957.61 I hereby certify that this survey, plan, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. C�` f"- `•UJB' Date: 01/31/17 Charles E. Webb, Jr. License No. 41226 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: Lot 6 and 7, Block 1, MONTICELLO TRAVEL CENTER SECOND ADDITION, Wright County, Minnesota. NOTES: 1) The legal description as shown hereon was obtained from Title Commitment File No. NCS-808341-MPLS issued by as a proform by First American Title Insurance Company . The review and depiction of any easements other than the platted easements and sign easement was not within the scope of this survey. 2) Benchmark: Top nut of fire hydrant located on the northeasterly side of Oakwood Drive East as shown hereon. Elevation= 959.37 feet (NGVD 1988 datum) 3) Area: 32723 SgFt 0.8 Acres 4) Location of utilities existing on or serving the surveyed property as determined by observed evidence and markings by utility companies and other appropriate sources (are shown hereon), subject to the following restrictions: A. Utility operations do not consistently respond to locate requests through the Gopher State One Call service for boundary purposes such as this. B. EXTREME CAUTION MUST BE EXERCISED BEFORE AN EXCAVATION TAKES PLACE ON OR NEAR THIS SITE. BEFORE DIGGING, YOU ARE REQUIRED BY LAW TO NOTIFY GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE AT (651) 454-0002. C. The exact location of underground features cannot be accurately depicted without excavation or "potholing". D. Per Gopher State One -Call Ticket No. 170300505, the following utilities and municipalities were notified: TDS TELECOM 763-295-2301 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 800-778-9140 CITY OF MONTICELLO/FIBERNET 763-314-0113 CENTER POINT ENERGY 608-223-2014 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 651-366-5750 NORTHERN NATURAL GAS 651-674-4488 TDS METROCOM 218-821-7672 XCEL ENERGY 800-848-7558 A Drawn by: TTH REVISIONS Checked by: CEW Jr. INO. DATE BY DESCRIPTION 1 05/08/17 TTH Added City Resolution I I I I 19zefflgro etelur3a]=rl1z11bi SHEET: 1 OF 1 STANDARDS AND REFERENCES Materials and construction methods specified in the plans reference the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MNDOT) Standard Specifications for Construction. The Contractor shall obtain a current copy of MNDOT's Standard Specifications for Construction and review the specification sections applicable to the plans. It is mandatory that the Contractor be knowledgable of the applicable MNDOT specification sections during construction. No additional compensation will be paid to the Contractor for additional work due to unfamiliarity with the applicable specification sections. Contractor shall refer to the geotechnical report for additional requirements and recommendations. EARTHWORK NOTES PROTECTION 1) The Contractor shall maintain all benchmarks, monuments and other reference points. If any are disturbed or destroyed, they shall be replaced at the Contractor's expense. 2). The Contractor shall contact the Engineer immediately if any unknown functioning underground utilities are discovered during the course of the project, which may interfere with construction. The Contractor shall wait for instructions before proceeding. 3) The Contractor shall be responsible for any damage to functioning underground or overhead utility lines. Damaged utilities shall be repaired immediately and service restored at no additional cost to the Owner. 4) The Contractor shall provide barricades, shoring and other safety measures required by OSHA. 5) The Contractor shall protect all adjacent existing facilities from damage, including, but not limited to settlement due to excavations, erosion, etc. The Contractor shall be responsible for the repair of such damages. PROJECT CONDITIONS 1) The Contractor shall become familiar with the project site, and compare actual conditions in the field with those shown on the project drawings. The Contractor shall contact the Engineer immediately if any inconsistencies are found between the existing conditions and the project drawings. 2) No extra compensation will be allowed due to unusual conditions which could have reasonably been determined or anticipated by examination of the project site and project drawings. PLAN GRADES 1) Elevations shown on the project drawings are finished grade elevations, unless noted otherwise. Elevations not specifically indicated shall be determined by interpolation of uniform slope between spot elevations and/or contours, or between such points and existing elevations. Adequate slope shall be constructed to provide positive drainage away from structures. 2) If inconsistencies exist on the plans between contours and spot elevations, the spot elevations shall govern. TOPSOIL 1) Adequate imported and/or stockpiled salvageable topsoil shall be utilized for this project. 2) Topsoil shall be free of clay lumps, roots, brush, large stones, and debris, and shall have a minimum organic content of 5 percent. 3) Remove topsoil to its entire depth from areas, which are to be disturbed by new construction work. Existing lawn areas, which are not in the proposed construction area (s) shall remain in place. The Contractor shall field verify topsoil depths between any soil borings, and remove to greater depths than indicated in the soils report if such conditions are encountered. Salvaged topsoil shall be maintained in stockpiles. 4) Stockpiled topsoil shall only be used for finish grading of new lawn areas. Excess topsoil shall be removed from the site by the Contractor. 5) Protect all existing lawn areas, plantings, and other landscaping to remain in place. Any damaged areas shall be replaced at the Contractor's expense. UNFORESEEN OBSTACLES 1) The Engineer shall be contacted immediately if any unforeseen major obstacles are encountered during excavation, such as abandoned wells, abandoned or functioning utilities, subsurface streams or rock, etc., which would add significant expense to the Contractor. 2) The Contractor shall still be responsible for completing all work required for this project where encountered conditions may be reasonably determined from a soils/geotechnical report and review of the project site and contract documents. DEWATERING 1) Surface drainage shall be provided during construction in a manner so as not to create a nuisance to adjacent areas. 2) All excavations shall be free of water during construction within the excavations. Dewatering shall be accomplished by pumping or trenching, and shall be conducted regardless of the cause, source, or nature of the water. 3) Berms, cofferdams, or piling shall be provided as necessary to protect excavations. 4) Excavations shall be sloped to drain, and necessary pumps, hoses and other equipment shall be provided to keep excavation free of water. 5) All temporary equipment used for dewatering shall be removed from the site when no longer necessary. FILLING AND GRADING 1) Rough grading of all areas within the construction limits, including adjacent transition areas shall be reasonably smooth and compacted. The rough graded subgrade surface generally shall not be more than 6 inches above or below the established subgrade elevations. All ditches, swales, and gutters shall be graded to drain adequately. The subgrade shall be evenly sloped to provide drainage away from building walls in all directions at a minimum slope of 1 %. The Contractor shall provide rounded transitions at top and bottom of banks and other breaks in grade. 2) Fill and backfill materials shall be inorganic soils free of roots, rocks, boulders, and debris. 3) Bedding material or granular backfill larger than 2" in its largest dimension shall not be allowed within 2 feet of new underground pipes. Material larger than 3" in its largest dimension shall not be allowed within 1 foot of subgrade elevation. 4) Imported compacted fill material shall have a maximum of 12 percent passing the #200 sieve, by weight. The proposed fill material shall be tested by an independent testing lab for suitability as compacted fill for this project. The Contractor shall pay for the testing services and provide a copy of the test results to the Engineer. 5) The Contractor shall fill and grade as necessary to bring surface to required elevations, and provide all materials necessary, whether obtained on or off the project site. 6) The Contractor shall place compacted material in uniform horizontal lifts not exceeding 8" in depth for clay soils, and 12" in depth for sandy soils, and compact as required to achieve specified density. 7) Compaction shall be obtained with the use of vibratory rollers or rammers. During compaction, fill material shall contain moisture content, as necessary, for the required compaction as indicated by an independent testing laboratory. The moisture shall be uniform throughout each lift. If the material is too dry, water shall be added with approved equipment and methods, which will not wash out fine material. If the material is too wet, it shall be dried by harrowing, disking, blading, or other approved methods recommended by the independent testing laboratory. 8) Areas designated for pavement in excavated (cut) areas shall be scarified to a depth of 1 foot. The Contractor shall bring the subgrade material to optimum moisture content as indicated by the independent testing laboratory, and compact the subgrade to the specified density listed below for soils underneath pavements. 9) The Contractor shall not place fill material when either the fill material, or the material on which it is to be placed, is frozen. Any soft or yielding areas appearing in the fill resulting from frost, rain, or any other reason whatsoever shall be scarified, removed, recompacted and/or otherwise rectified to the satisfaction of the Engineer before any new fill is placed. COMPACTION TESTS 1) Utility Trench Backfill: The Contractor's independent soils technician and approved testing laboratory shall perform in-place density and moisture tests at random depths in trench backfill at 100 foot intervals, or fraction thereof. Compaction of trenches shall be a minimum of 95% of the maximum dry density (as determined by the independent testing laboratory) in lawn areas, and at depths greater than 3 feet below areas designated for pavement. Compaction of trenches at depths within 3 feet of paved surfaces shall be a minimum of 100% of the maximum dry density. 2) Compacted Fill Under Pavements: Compaction tests shall not be required beneath new pavements. Adequate compaction of materials under pavements shall be determined by test rolling the subgrade, and checking for excessive rutting. Test rolling shall be performed as per MNDOT Spec. 2111. 3) Areas exhibiting a failed compaction test shall be re -compacted and re -m tested to the satisfaction of the Engineer prior to acceptance of the project. 4) Copies of all compaction testing and test roll observation reports shall be provided to the Engineer. 5) Optimum moisture -density relationship will be determined by testing laboratory in accordance with ASTM D698 and maximum density determination made by Method D of ASTM D698 unless otherwise noted in these specifications. SUBGRADE PREPARATION 1) Finished subgrade elevations shall be as follows: a) Bituminous pavement: 9" below finish grade. b) Concrete sidewalk: 8" below finish grade (plus thickened edge). c) Lawn areas: 4" below finish grade. d) Planting areas: See Landscaping Plans/Details 2) The tolerance for areas to be paved shall not exceed 0.15 feet above or below plan subgrade. 3) The Contractor shall protect newly graded areas from erosion. Settlement or washing that occurs prior to acceptance of the Work shall be repaired and grades re-established. DISPOSAL OF EXCESS WASTE MATERIALS 1) The Contractor shall remove excess excavated material, debris, and waste materials, from the Owner's property and legally dispose of it in accordance with all governing codes. SPREADING TOPSOIL AND FINISH GRADING 1) Scarify subgrade to depth of 3" prior to placing topsoil. Spread topsoil evenly over complete subgrade as follows: a) Lawn Areas on Private Property: Spread 4" lightly compacted layer of topsoil. b) Lawn Areas in Public Right-of-way: Per City requirements c) Planting Areas: See Landscape Plan/Details 2) Finish grade accurately within 0.15 feet of finish grades shown on the project drawings, less the thickness of any sod where it is to be installed. Slope all grades away from buildings to provide positive drainage. 3) Prepare topsoil suitable to receive seed and/or sod. Grading of areas designated for topsoil shall be reasonably smooth and even, and in accordance with MNDOT Spec. 2105.3G and 2574.3A4. All debris and stones exceeding 3" in diameter shall be removed from the soil surface of these areas prior to seeding. Areas compacted by vehicles or storage of materials shall be plowed, disked and harrowed to match texture of other finish graded areas. 4 Grass seed shall be in accordance with MnDOT Spec. 3876 seed mix No. 25-131 applied at the rate of 220 p pp pounds per acre or as indicated on the landscape plans. Mulch shall be applied and discanchored to all seeded areas and shall meet the requirements of MnDOT Spec. 3882, Type 3 or as otherwise indicated by the Engineer. UTILITY NOTES STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS 1) The following standard specifications shall apply to this project: a) Minnesota Plumbing Code - MN Rules Chapter 4714 (MN Dept. of Labor and Industry-MNDLI) b) Uniform Plumbing Code, latest edition (UPC) c) "What you need to know about utility service connections in the 2015 Minnesota Plumbing Code" http://www.dli.mn.gov/CCLD/PDF/pe_usc.pdf d) City Engineers Association of Minnesota (CEAM) Standard Specifications e) American Society for Testing Materials (ASTM) f) American National Standards Institute (ANSI) g) American Water Works Association (AWWA) h) Minnesota Department of Transportation "Standard Specifications for Construction" (MN/DOT) 2) The Contractor shall comply with all local ordinances and codes 3) Certifications of all utility materials, as well as shop drawings, shall be submitted to the Engineer for review POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC) PIPE AND FITTINGS - SANITARY 1) Smooth walled polyvinyl chloride pipe and fittings shall consist of SDR 26 or SDR 35 pipe, unless noted otherwise, and meet the requirements of ASTM D3034 and Section 2621.2A5 of the CEAM Standard Specifications 2) All pipe and fittings shall be SDR 35 for depths of up to 20 feet, and SDR 26 for depths exceeding 20'. 3) Pipe joints shall meet the requirements of Section 2621.3A3 of the CEAM Standard Specifications. DUCTILE IRON (DIP) PIPE AND FITTINGS - WATER 1) Ductile iron pipe and fittings shall meet the requirements of Table 604.1 of the UPC, and Section 2611.2A1 of the CEAM Standard Specifications 2) Pipe joints shall meet the requirements of Section 605.5 of the UPC, and Section 2611.3B of the CEAM Standard Specifications. Stainless steel fasteners shall be prohibited. 3) 6" pipe shall be Class 52. 8" and larger pipe shall be Class 50. POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (C900 PVC) PIPE AND FITTINGS - WATER 1) Polyvinyl chloride pressure pipe and fittings shall meet the requirements of Table 604.1 of the UPC, and Section 2611.2A3 of the CEAM Standard Specifications 2) Pipe joints shall meet the requirements of Section 605.4 of the UPC, and Section 2611.3B of the CEAM Standard Specifications. GATE VALVES - WATER 1) Gate valves shall meet the requirements of Sections 2611.2C and 2611.3D of the CEAM Standard Specifications HYDRANTS - WATER 1) Hydrants shall meet the requirements of Sections 2611.2B and 2611.3D of the CEAM Standard Specifications 2) Hydrants shall be Waterous WB67, or approved equal BLOCKING AND ANCHORING - WATER 1) Water main blocking and anchoring shall meet the requirements of Section 2611.3A4 of the CEAM Standard Specifications 2) Provide thrust reaction blocking consisting of concrete with a minimum 28 day compressive strength of 2000 psi. 3) Place between undisturbed ground and the fitting to be anchored. Place thrust blocking so that the pipe and fitting joints are accessible for repair. 4) Mega -Lugs may be used in lieu of thrust block if allowed by local utility. WATER SERVICE PIPE AND CURB STOPS 1) Copper tubing for water services shall meet the requirements of Table 604.1 of the UPC, and Section 2611.2D of the CEAM Standard Specifications 2) HDPE pressure pipe for water services shall meet the requirements of ASTM D2239, ASTM D2737, ASTM D3035, AWWA C901, CSA B137.1, and Section 2611.21D of the CEAM Standard Specifications 3) Curb stops for water services Section 2611.2D of the CEAM Standard Specifications HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE PIPE (HDPE) AND FITTINGS - STORM 1) HDPE pipe and fittings shall meet the requirements of ASTM F2306, and Section 2621.2A8 of the CEAM Standard Specifications 2) Pipe joints shall meet the requirements Section 2621.3A3 of the CEAM Standard Specifications 3) Minimum wall thickness shall be 0.035 inches for 12 and 15 inch diameter pipe, and shall be 0.05 inches for 18 and 24 inch diameter pipe. 4) HDPE storm sewer crossing above and within 10 -ft of existing or proposed water main or services shall meet the following standards per the MN plumbing code: 4"- 10" Diameter: AASHTO M252 12" - 60" Diameter: ASTM F2306 Fittings: ASTM D3212 REINFORCED CONCRETE SEWER PIPE (RCP) AND FITTINGS - STORM 1) RCP pipe and fittings shall meet the requirements of ASTM C76, and Section 2621.2A3 of the CEAM Standard Specifications 2) Pipe joints shall meet the requirements of Section 2621.3A3 of the CEAM Standard Specifications 3) The ASTM strength class of pipe shall be Class III unless otherwise shown on the Plans. 4) The pipe shall be drawn together by some approved method of jacking or winching. This pressure must be maintained until sufficient backfill is placed to keep the joint from opening. END SECTIONS - STORM 1) End sections shall be provided at all pipe inlets and outlets. 2) The end sections shall consist of material matching the material of the pipe, which it is being connected to. Materials and joints shall be as per the specifications described above for the applicable pipe material. 3) The last 3 joints of RCP shall be tied, and the end section shall the be provided with an approved trash guard. MANHOLES AND CATCH BASINS - SANITARY AND STORM 1) Unless otherwise noted, manhole and catch basin structures shall consist of precast concrete, and meet the requirements of Section 719.6 of the UPC (sanitary only), and Sections 2621.2C and 2621.3D of the CEAM Standard Specifications 2) Catch basins shall be provided with the following castings: a) Along curbline: 27" Structure: Neenah R -3075-L, 48" (or larger) Structure: Neenah R -3067-L b) Isolated (in paved area): Neenah R-2553 c) Isolated (in vegetated area): Neenah R -2560 -EA w/ type "C" grate 3) Manholes shall be provided with the following castings: a) Sanitary: Neenah R-1733 w/ concealed pick hole b) Storm: Neenah R-1733 lettered "STORM", center pick hole INSTALLATION 1) Unless otherwise noted, installation of all water and sewer pipe, fittings, and appurtenances shall be as per the CEAM Standard Specifications. TESTING REQUIREMENTS 1) Water and sewer pipe, fittings, and appurtances shall be inspected and tested as per Sections 2611.3E -2611.3H and 2621,3F -2621.3H of the CEAM Standard Specifications. 2) In the event of discrepancies between the testing requirements of the MN Plumbing Code and the CEAM Standard Specifications, the most stringent will govern. BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT NOTES STANDARDS 1) Minnesota Standard Specifications for Highway Construction, most recent edition. GRANULAR BASE COURSE 1) Compacted thickness of finished base course: 6' 2) Process material for aggregate base shall meet the requirements of MNDOT Spec. 3138, Class 5.. 3) The subgrade shall be tested and observed to the satisfaction of the Engineer prior to placement of aggregate base material. Install base material as required to accommodate new plan grades. 4) Wet base material to approximate optimum moisture content either prior to delivery to job site or as soon as practical after being placed on subgrade. 5) Place in layers not exceeding 4" thickness (loose). 6) Compact with pneumatic or vibrating steel drum rollers. 7) After base course has been graded and compacted, thoroughly wet and slush roll with roller until all aggregates are thoroughly embedded. 8) Allow base course to cure for a minimum of 72 hours prior to bituminous course application. BITUMINOUS BASE AND SURFACE COURSE 1) Mix Designation Numbers for the bituminous mixtures on this project are per MNDOT Spec. 2360 2) Pavement smoothness requirements will be waived for this project. 3) Density for the bituminous mixture on this project will be the ordinary compaction method (MNDOT 2360.6C). 4) Bituminous Base course shall conform to MnDOT 2360, Type SPNWB330B and shall be 1J inches thick after compaction. Bituminous Surface course shall conform to MnDOT 2360, Type SPWEA340B and shall be 1J inches thick after compaction. 5) Place no asphaltic mixture when the atmospheric temperature is below 45 degrees and falling, nor should pavement be placed under wet conditions. 6) Mixing a) Paving mixture: Uniform mixture of course aggregate, fine aggregate, mineral filler and asphaltic material. b) Grading and mixing: Conform to applicable sections of the Minnesota Standard Specifications for Highway Construction, Section 2360. CONSTRUCTION METHODS 1) Properly clean base course and deliver hot mix asphaltic concrete in clean tight vehicles with covers if necessary. 2) Lay to a smooth surface without segregation of material and attain compaction as early as possible. Commence rolling while the material is hot, (minimum spread temperature 250 degrees F.) as soon as it will support the roller without undue displacement or hairline cracking and continue until a minimum of 96% of maximum has been attained, no further compression can be attained and all roller marks are eliminated. 3) The completed surface: Smooth, free of pockets that will retain water and shall not vary more than 1/16" per foot nor more than 1/4" under a 16' straight edge. Entire surface must drain. No flat areas are permitted. 4) Perform all Work in accordance with the applicable requirements of the Minnesota Standard Specifications for Highway Construction. PAINTED LINES 1) Special marking paint compound especially for striping bituminous paving in one coat. 2) Manufacturers: Pratt & Lambert, Inc.; Sherwin Williams Co. or DuPont Co. 3) Colors: Use white paint for concrete and asphalt. 4) All surfaces to be painted must be thoroughly clean and dry. 5) Lay out painted lines with chalk on pavement in accordance with Project Drawings. 6) Accurately apply paint to the chalk marks, using striping machines, 4" wide stripes. 7) Apply paint in strict accordance with the manufacturer's directions. 8) Protect all paint from damage by traffic until dry. 9) Apply handicap logo at handicap stall. FIELD QUALITY CONTROL 1) Aggregate Base Testing: a) The granular base course shall be test rolled and observed by the Contractor's independent soils technician as per MNDOT 2211.3C2 (Quality Compaction Method). Once the base course has been tested to the satisfaction of the Engineer, pavement may be placed. b) One mechanical analysis (ASTM D-422) per 500 cubic yards of base or fraction thereof. HOT WEATHER CONCRETE 1) Do not place concrete when the atmospheric temperature is above 100 degrees F. 2) Maintain concrete temperature of 40 to 90 degrees F. for 3 days. Protect from temperatures over 90 degrees for the following 5 days. 3) Thoroughly wet dry porous surfaces before concreting. 4) Water reducing admixtures with retarding properties are required for all concrete placed when the temperature exceeds 80 degrees F. 5) Perform all hot weather concreting in accord with ACI 305. FINISHING 1) Provide a broomed finish on exterior sidewalks and ramps unless noted otherwise. QUALITY CONTROL 1) The Contractor shall hire an independent testing firm to provide the following tests: a) The independent testing technician shall perform random field testing of the fresh concrete including slump, air content, and temperature. (ASTM C143, C173, C231 and C138). One series of the aforementioned tests shall be performed on the first load of concrete. b) The independent testing technician shall cast a set of four compression test cylinders for the first load of concrete as well as 1 set for every 100 cubic yards, or fraction thereof, of concrete thereafter. Compression tests shall be performed on one test cylinder at 7 days and two test cylinders at 28 days. The fourth test cylinder shall be retained in the event of failing compression tests on the 28 -day test cylinders. GENERAL NOTES & SPECIFICATIONS V Z Lu Z 3�- 0/'� L/ L U 3 PROJECT NUMBER: 17029 a� Q U7 O N O r - � Q C/) � W0 LU LU > Z Q Z 0 O 0 I LU Q OZ Cl OF 8 U O N W O M U) QR J U c O O Z a N N N U U N F_N 0- = N 2) Bituminous Testing: N O U J mO O O E a) Test temperature of first truck. Z Q b) Ordinary compaction (MNDOT 2360.6C) CONCRETE PAVEMENT, CURB & GUTTER, AND SIDEWALK N O w o U a7 o STANDARDS `� N Qp� o 1) ACI 318, ACI 315, CRSI, ACI 301, latest adoptions. N O U O ON > 3 :N 'D U o 2) Minnesota Standard Specifications for Construction, most recent edition 0 N a c N Q Q � .0 O N w •� m GRANULAR BASE COURSE MATERIAL 1) Compacted thickness of finished base: 6' - Concrete Pavement/Apronsr n O O E 4" - Concrete Sidewalk `J (D c O O T- 2) Base material shall consist of MNDOT 3149.262 Select Granular Borrow. 2) CO N AGGREGATES Z co co .> co O W (11 O CO 2 1) Coarse: MnDOT Spec. 3137. MCO N UJ 2) Fine: MnDOT Spec. 3126.7 X U) E LL -c WATERU ' ^ Q V rE ) O 1) Clean, fresh and potable, MnDOT Spec. 3906. U C AIR ENTRAINING ADMIXTURES W W N 1) ASTM C260. a 2) Provide entrainment of 4 - 7 percent by volume. c L J O C_ PORTLAND CEMENT � J 06 c 1) ASTM C 150, Type I plus an approved air entraining agent, or Type IA air -entraining Portland cement. ) N OTHER ADMIXTURES U D 1) MnDOT Spec. 3113. V J CO O > LO 2) Calcium Chloride or materials containing chlorides or nitrates shall not be allowed. 1 , Fr z 3: \_ N� PROPORTIONING AND DESIGN OF MIXES N - 1) MnDOT Spec. 2461.3 O U) E op�c>S 2) Concrete Classifications T a) Curb and gutter, slip -formed concrete: 3A22 b) Sidewalk, aprons, incidental concrete, manual curb & gutter: 3A32 c) Concrete pavements or aprons: 3Y43 d) Repair concrete, fast strength concrete: 3Y43 Z LJ 3) Concrete Specifications: 1 0 Z - - a) 3A22: 1 2" slump, 3900 psi, 4 7%air b) 3A32: 2-3" slump, 3900 psi, 4-7% air c) 3Y43: 3-4" slump, 4300 psi, 4-7% air J 02 d) Temperatures of all concrete during placement shall be 50 -deg F to 90 -deg F J02 CONCRETE PLACEMENT 1) Place concrete as soon as possible after mixing. Place before initial set has occurred, and in no event after it has contained its water content for more than one hour. 2) Avoid overworking concrete or allowing concrete to fall unrestricted for excessive vertical distances, and other situations which can cause segregation of the aggregates. 3) Concrete pavements shall be placed in accordance with applicable portions of MnDOT 2301. 4) Sidewalks shall be placed in accordance with MnDOT 2521. Z LU 5) Curb and gutter shall be placed in accordance with MnDOT 2531. O PROTECTION U 1) Provide adequate protection against rain, sleet and snow before and during placement and finishing of concrete. U 2) Protect concrete from premature drying. Provide temporary covering as required. Keep concrete oe Z LU continuously moist for 7 days. O v> w Z 0 3) Treat concrete with membrane curing compound in accordance with MnDOT 2531.3G. COLD WEATHER CONCRETE > w LU 1) Do not place concrete when the atmospheric temperature is below 40 degrees F., or when the concrete is likely to be subjected to freezing temperatures within 24 hours after it has been deposited unless adequate r\ temporary heating is provided. 2) Maintain concrete temperature of 40 to 90 degrees F. for 3 days. Protect from freezing for the following 5 days. � w 00 z Q o O o 0 3) No frozen materials may be used in the concrete. Chemicals may not be used to prevent freezing unless N approved by the Engineer. w O Q:� Z N c� 4) Perform all cold weather concreting in accord with ACI 306. HOT WEATHER CONCRETE 1) Do not place concrete when the atmospheric temperature is above 100 degrees F. 2) Maintain concrete temperature of 40 to 90 degrees F. for 3 days. Protect from temperatures over 90 degrees for the following 5 days. 3) Thoroughly wet dry porous surfaces before concreting. 4) Water reducing admixtures with retarding properties are required for all concrete placed when the temperature exceeds 80 degrees F. 5) Perform all hot weather concreting in accord with ACI 305. FINISHING 1) Provide a broomed finish on exterior sidewalks and ramps unless noted otherwise. QUALITY CONTROL 1) The Contractor shall hire an independent testing firm to provide the following tests: a) The independent testing technician shall perform random field testing of the fresh concrete including slump, air content, and temperature. (ASTM C143, C173, C231 and C138). One series of the aforementioned tests shall be performed on the first load of concrete. b) The independent testing technician shall cast a set of four compression test cylinders for the first load of concrete as well as 1 set for every 100 cubic yards, or fraction thereof, of concrete thereafter. Compression tests shall be performed on one test cylinder at 7 days and two test cylinders at 28 days. The fourth test cylinder shall be retained in the event of failing compression tests on the 28 -day test cylinders. GENERAL NOTES & SPECIFICATIONS V Z Lu Z 3�- 0/'� L/ L U 3 PROJECT NUMBER: 17029 a� Q U7 O N O r - � Q C/) � W0 LU LU > Z Q Z 0 O 0 I LU Q OZ Cl OF 8 /r USE NEENAH R -1642-A FOR LOW PROFILE APPLICATIONS USE NEENAH R1755 -G FOR WATERTIGHT APPLICATIONS LETTERING TO READ: SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER OR WATER MAIN WHICH EVER IS APPLICABLE. rarcnleH R-1642 WITH B SOLID LID VE BEARING OR 25 3/4 " BEARINP SURFACE TO BE MACHINED DD, �D COVER CONCEALED PICKHOLES (2) " EAT OPPOSITE SI EXCEPT FOR LETTERI 7"� I_ 24" 28 1/2 " 36" Standard Plate Library City of Monticello FRAME Title: Standard Frame and Cover Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised: 1002 03-15 Q CASTING ADJUSTING RINGS 4" MIN - 12" MAX STANDARD FRAME & COVER INSTALL INFRA SHIELD (OR APPROVED EQUAL) r ROADWAY SURFACE EXTERNAL CHIMNEY SEAL l SEE MnDOT STANDARD PLATE 4020 FOR COVER REQUIREMENTS WALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE CLASS II PRECAST PIPE, EXCEPT 48" DIA MAY BE ASTM C 478 CONCRETE PIPE. SEE MnDOT STANDARD zo z 8" CAST -IN-PLACE = PLATE 3000 (NO TONGUE OR GROOVE AT TOP © CONCRETE — OR BOTTOM OF THIS SECTION). CAST -IN-PLACE 04 o N 4' TO 10' CONCRETE OR MASONRY CONSTRUCTION (BRICK OR BLOCK) ALLOWED ONLY IF APPROVED Y BY ENGINEER hoz JU V) m 0 • :• _ CONCRETE DOGHOUSE REQUIRED ON 3 x OUTSIDE AND INSIDE OF STRUCTURE �.x z AND PIPE CONNECTION O 2 � Q Uj 2 �0 Y rIL M U M STRUCTURES 8" POURED CONCRETE BASE, FOR ALTERNATE PRECAST CONCRETE BASE. SEE MnDOT STANDARD PLATE 4011 (MODIFY DIAMETER AND 2" RAISED AREA TO FIT REQUIRED DIAMETER. 01 REFER TO STANDARD PLANS FOR HEIGHT AND DIAMETER REQUIRED. 02 MANHOLE STEPS SHALL BE CAST IRON OR MA MODEL PS -I -PF (BY MA INDUSTRIAL INC.) CONFORMING TO ALL OSHA REGULATIONS AND SPACED 16" OC. 03 MINIMUM STEEL REINFORCEMENT ® EQUIVALENT STEEL AREA IN WIRE MESH MAY BE USED 05 GENERAL DIMENSIONS FOR CONCRETE APPLY TO BRICK AND CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT CONSTRUCTION ALSO, EXCEPT AS NOTED. ® 12" MINIMUM FOR PRECAST, 3 BRICKS OR 1 BLOCK MINIMUM FOR MASONRY CONSTUCTION Q REINFORCEMENT AS PER MnDOT SPEC 3301, GRADE 60. Standard Plate Library City of Monticello MANHOLE MANHOLE:; OR PLASTERED OR CATCH EXTERIOR CATCH BASIN BASIN DIA DIA _ SEWER BRICK (MnDOT SPEC 3616) BLOCK MASONRY CONSTRUCTION Title: Standard Manhole for Storm Sewer Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised: 03-17 4001 TOP OF PROPOSED SUBGRADE THE TOP 3' SHALL BE COMPACTED AT A MIN OF 100% OF STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY (MN/DOT 2105) A MAX OF 2' LIFTS TO BE WETTED AND CONSOLIDATED BY VIBRATORY MEANS AND COMPACTED TO A MIN OF 95% OF STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY (MN/DOT 2105) 4' COVER COMPACTED TO 95% OF STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY WITHOUT THE USE OF HEAVY ROLLER EQUIPMENT GRANULAR BEDDING AS PER MN/DOT 3149.2F GRANULAR FOUNDATION WHERE ORDERED BY THE ENGINEER SHOVEL, PLACE, AND HAND COMPACT AROUND PIPE TO 12" ABOVE PIPE. VIBRATORY COMPACTION REQUIRED EACH SIDE OF PIPE, AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. Standard Plate Library City of Monticello A L CURB INLET FRAME AND CURB BOX NEENAH NO. R -3067—V _4" CONCRETE COLLAR INSTALL INFRA SHIELD (OR APPROVED EQUAL) EXTERNAL CHIMNEY SEAL ADJUSTING RINGS 4" MIN - 12" MAX ENCASE IN CONCRETE COLLAR USE CONCRETE CURB MIX FOR COLLAR Title: Typical Trench Compaction and Class B Bedding Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised: 03-15 1007 I I = D = A D � 35 1/4 43„ II PLAN ALL STORM SEWER CASTING ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THE PLANS HAVE BEEN DEPRESSED 0.10' BELOW GUTTER ELEVATION (SEE DETAIL 5003) — 24" ..� FINISH GRADE 31" 12" 2 5" 3'— 6" (4�" MIN. 34" •I IMI 'Cl \4 IM I N. 4" CONCRETE COLLAR NOTES: SECTION A -A POUR A 3" TO 4" CONCRETE COLLAR AROUND RINGS EXTENDING FROM THE CASTING TO THE PRECAST SECTION CATCH BASINS LOCATED IN DRIVEWAYS SHALL BE TYPE MnDOT DESIGN H. THE CASTING SHALL BE NEENAH R -3508-A2. Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Title: Standard Catch Basin Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised:4002 03-17 USE 4" OR 6" CISP PLUG AND CAP, TOP TO BE 1/2 " BELOW FINISHED GRADE VARIES 10' TO 20' _WUIRLU I V OUTS FINISHED GRADE D6" PVC RISER FOR NON-RESIDENTIAL 4" PVC RISER FOR RESIDENTIAL 4" OR 6" VERTICAL WYE (PVC) 1/8 BEND CONCRETE ENCASEMENT 12" ALL AROUND (INCIDENTAL) WATER TIGHT GASKET OR CEMENTED PLUG PVC HORIZONTAL WYE (PVC) THRUST BLOCKING FOR CLEANING EQUIPMENT 1. PAYMENT FOR 6" RISER PIPE, 6" VERTICAL WYE 45' BEND AND PLUG WILL BE PAID FOR AT UNIT PRICE BID PER EACH. 2. CLEAN -OUTS REQUIRED AT 70' INTERVALS FROM MAIN SEWER LINE. Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Title: Sanitary Clean -Out Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised: 3006 03-15 �1 A = D = A 35-1/4" 43" O PLAN CASTING TO BE SET 0.10' BELOW GUTTER ELEVATION INSTALL INFRA SHIELD CURB INLET FRAME AND CURB BOX (OR APPROVED EQUAL) STANDARD CASTING — NEENAH R -3067—V EXTERNAL CHIMNEY SEAL ADJUSTING RINGS 4" MIN — 12" MAX ENCASE WITH CONCRETE MANHOLE COVER TO BE 48" DIA COLLAR 6" CRETEX OPENING TYPE II WITH 24"x 36" *15" I 24" I 9" CONCRETE DOGHOUSE REQUIRED ON OUTSIDE AND INSIDE OF STRUCTURE W *48"(TYP) AND PIPE CONNECTION *DIMENSION VARIES o BASED ON STRUCTURE DIAMETER IRCP PIPE CONCRETE CATCH BASIN MANHOLE J NOTES: ANDBASE TO BE CRETEX TYPE 433B OR APPROVED EQUAL 1. BASE TO BE GROUTED TO FORM A SMOOTH INVERT TO OUTLET. SECTION 2. PIPE CUT—OUTS TO BE LOCATED WHERE REQUIRED. CATCH BASIN MANHOLES REQUIRED IN GREEN SPACES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF PRECAST CONCRETE ONLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH Mn/DOT STANDARD PLATE 4006L. THE CASTING SHALL BE NEENAH R-4342. CATCH BASIN MANHOLES LOCATED IN DRIVEWAYS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH AN ECCENTRIC TOP SLAB WITH A 27" ROUND OPENING. THE CASTING SHALL BE NEENAH R -3508—A2. Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Title: Catch Basin Manhole Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised:4003 03-17 OBITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SECTION NOTES 1. FOR AREAS WHERE DRAINAGE IS DIRECTED AWAY J O N " PER FT SLOP FROM THE CURB, THE GUTTER SHALL BE TILTED TO � C DRAIN FROM THE CURB _ CONCRETE j 2. CONCRETE SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF Q 6„ MNDOT CONCRETE MIX 3A22 U f� 3 �/'� (D � U 3. MNDOT B612 CURB AND GUTTER SHALL MEET THE V) (D U? REQUIREMENTS OF STANDARD MNDOT PLATE 7100 >LO 1� �3 , 11 Z (o \ :3N— g • d \ � O N e ` 3 i cz 2" MIN. COMPACTED MNDOT -11 I I I I I I I I I -III -I CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE E—I I I—I I I-1 I I- I I I I—�=1 I III BELOW CURB AND GUTTER -III-I 1- III ; . ll I I � I APPROVED COMPACTED 20" ►{ SUBGRADE 2 C CURB & GUTTER (MNDOT B612) NTS — PARKING LOT 4" CONCRETE (MNDOT CONCRETE MIX 3A32) 1" CHAMFER 61� a• i • ,/ a ... N •. e • Fi I I—III-1 I I-1 1 1—iii-1 1 1—iii—I I �I I I-1 1 1—iii—iii—iii—III.—.1 4" MNDOT 3149.262 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW CONTRACTION AND EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AS PER MNDOT SPEC. APPROVED COMPACTED 2521.3C2 SUBGRADE 3 THICKENED EDGE SIDEWALK (D NTS 4" CONCRETE (MNDOT CONCRETE MIX 3A32) • . ° 4" MNDOT 3149.282 SELECT • GRANULAR BORROW I I—III—III—III—III—III—III—III—III—III—III—I I -IIEdIEdI1=1IEdIEdIEdIMI IEdI IEIIEdIE I �-I � I -III -III -III -_III I I 1-1 I I -I � I -I 111 19 � -III—III—III= I I—I I I I— — APPROVED COMPACTED I II11I I1�,1_I�_ _111=11�llllll SUBGRADE CONTRACTION AND EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AS PER MNDOT SPEC. 2521.3C2 ( 4 CONCRETE SIDEWALK SECTION NTS STANDARD DETAILS z 0z 0C) (Z_j J� U 0. CV W 0 >' co 't J O O z 1�' BITUMINOUS WEARING Q U.0 COURSE (MNDOT 2360 TYPE CL > SPWEA340B) C O U TACK COAT BETWEEN m p O BITUMINOUS COURS S Q U -0 } - O N O w 11" BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE (MNDOT 2360 TYPE U o SPNWB330B) L Q O L0 O O N? O U 0 0 U N O 6" MNDOT CLASS 5 -0 3 .i Qj AGGREGATE BASE w - /0^ /4) •}C}''{� o C — i n W m D APPROVED COMPACTED z SUBGRADEn 0) O E O `J O Z 0O T- U cn CY) (.05 wZ o(D0) LU w co 00 N 0 Zw a LL L NTS ' ^ Q V W E 0 Z W w .N < o N ~ NOTES 1. FOR AREAS WHERE DRAINAGE IS DIRECTED AWAY J O N " PER FT SLOP FROM THE CURB, THE GUTTER SHALL BE TILTED TO � C DRAIN FROM THE CURB _ CONCRETE j 2. CONCRETE SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF Q 6„ MNDOT CONCRETE MIX 3A22 U f� 3 �/'� (D � U 3. MNDOT B612 CURB AND GUTTER SHALL MEET THE V) (D U? REQUIREMENTS OF STANDARD MNDOT PLATE 7100 >LO 1� �3 , 11 Z (o \ :3N— g • d \ � O N e ` 3 i cz 2" MIN. COMPACTED MNDOT -11 I I I I I I I I I -III -I CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE E—I I I—I I I-1 I I- I I I I—�=1 I III BELOW CURB AND GUTTER -III-I 1- III ; . ll I I � I APPROVED COMPACTED 20" ►{ SUBGRADE 2 C CURB & GUTTER (MNDOT B612) NTS — PARKING LOT 4" CONCRETE (MNDOT CONCRETE MIX 3A32) 1" CHAMFER 61� a• i • ,/ a ... N •. e • Fi I I—III-1 I I-1 1 1—iii-1 1 1—iii—I I �I I I-1 1 1—iii—iii—iii—III.—.1 4" MNDOT 3149.262 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW CONTRACTION AND EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AS PER MNDOT SPEC. APPROVED COMPACTED 2521.3C2 SUBGRADE 3 THICKENED EDGE SIDEWALK (D NTS 4" CONCRETE (MNDOT CONCRETE MIX 3A32) • . ° 4" MNDOT 3149.282 SELECT • GRANULAR BORROW I I—III—III—III—III—III—III—III—III—III—III—I I -IIEdIEdI1=1IEdIEdIEdIMI IEdI IEIIEdIE I �-I � I -III -III -III -_III I I 1-1 I I -I � I -I 111 19 � -III—III—III= I I—I I I I— — APPROVED COMPACTED I II11I I1�,1_I�_ _111=11�llllll SUBGRADE CONTRACTION AND EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AS PER MNDOT SPEC. 2521.3C2 ( 4 CONCRETE SIDEWALK SECTION NTS STANDARD DETAILS z 0z 0C) (Z_j J� z Z J W Uj I..L CIOQ Z ?:O U C PROJECT NUMBER: 17029 4-1 a� 0 rn N O O O� J �Sz LU Q OZ 00 �:2 Z LU O U U z w o z � O cn � w LU 0 Z < o 0 0 0 (L) LU O fl� 7- CN cY z Z J W Uj I..L CIOQ Z ?:O U C PROJECT NUMBER: 17029 4-1 a� 0 rn N O O O� J �Sz LU Q OZ 00 �:2 Sanitar Sewer Manhole RIM = 956,28 REMOVE EXISTING PAVEMENT AND CURB & GUTTER (TYP) 953.97 i Concrete Curb (B612) #Ill Bca�lgi�h9 Storm Sewer Manhole RIM = 955.78 Storm Sewer Manhole RIM = 956.19 Catch Basin RIM = 956,00 INV = 953.07 24" Surmountabl Sanitary Sewer Manhole RIM = 959.62 Catch Basin Concrete Curb RIM = 955,90 \ Concrete Curb (B618) Sanitary Sewer RIM = 959.41 INV N = 945.11 Catch BaAin RIM = 958.97 Storm Sewer RIM = 959.41 INV = 953.24 Catch Basin RIM = 958.95 Storm Sewer Manhole RIM = 959.16 �IBenchmark oncrete Curb NOTE: THE CITY WILL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY ADDITIONAL COSTS INCURRED THAT IS ASSOCIATED WITH VARIATIONS IN THE UTILITY AS -BUILT ELEVATIONS, OR PIPE SIZES AND MATERIAL TYPES. THESE ITEMS SHALL BE VERIFIED IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. Catch Basin RIM = 957,31 Catch Basir RIM = 957.4 Storm Sewer Manhole RIM = 957.95 GENERAL GRADING NOTES: 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS INCLUDING LOCATIONS, AND RIM AND INVERT ELEVATIONS, OF EXISTING DRAINAGE AND SANITARY STRUCTURES. LOCATION AND SIZE OF EXISTING SANITARY, WATER, AND STORM SEWER STUBS, AND EXISTING GRADES SHALL ALSO BE VERIFIED. 2. EXISTING TOPOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION WAS OBTAINED FROM A TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY PROVIDED BY WEBB SURVEYING, MAPLE LAKE, MN (763) 898-9999. 3. BENCHMARK: TOP NUT OF HYDRANT LOCATED ON NORTHEAST SIDE OF OAKWOOD DRIVE (SEE PLAN) - ELEV = 959.37 (NGVD '88 DATUM) 4. NOTIFY ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF ANY INCONSISTENCIES ARE DISCOVERED BETWEEN ACTUAL SITE CONDITIONS AND WHAT IS SHOWN ON THE PLANS, WHICH ARE SIGNIFICANT ENOUGH TO ALTER THE INTENT OF THE DRAWINGS. 5. IF REQUIRED BY THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY, THE OWNER OR CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A PLUMBING PERMIT PRIOR TO THE INSTALLATION OF ANY STORM SEWER UTILITIES. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER ONE CALL AT (800) 252-1166 FOR A UTILITY LOCATE PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION AND VERIFY LOCATIONS OF UTILITIES BEFORE BEGINNING WORK. 7. SEE SHEET C2 FOR STANDARD DETAILS. 8. HDPE STORM SEWER CROSSING ABOVE AND WITHIN 10 -FT OF EXISTING OR PROPOSED WATER MAIN OR SERVICES SHALL MEET THE FOLLOWING STANDARDS PER THE MN PLUMBING CODE: 4"- 10" DIAMETER: AASHTO M252 12" - 60" DIAMETER: ASTM F2306 FITTINGS: ASTM D3212 SEE SHEET C6 FOR LOCATIONS OF NEW WATER MAIN AND SERVICES. 9. FINISHED ELEVATIONS OF LAWN/GREEN AREAS ADJACENT TO BUILDINGS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 6" BELOW FINISHED FLOOR OR TOP -OF -BLOCK ELEVATION. 10. CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM CALCULATIONS TO VERIFY EARTHWORK QUANTITIES. CONTRACTOR'S BID SHALL BE BASED ON EARTHWORK CALCULATIONS COMPLETED BY THE CONTRACTOR 11. SPOT ELEVATIONS ARE FLOW LINE AND/OR FINISHED GRADES, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. TOP OF CURB ELEVATIONS ARE 6" ABOVE THE FLOW LINE SPOT ELEVATION SHOWN ON THE PLANS, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 12. "EX" DENOTES EXISTING SPOT ELEVATIONS 13. ALL PROPOSED ELEVATIONS ARE TOP OF PAVING OR GUTTER, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. PROPOSED ELEVATIONS ARE INTENDED TO PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE TOWARDS CATCH BASINS AND/OR OUTLETS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO PROVIDE THE REQUIRED ELEVATIONS, WHICH WILL PROMOTE POSITIVE DRAINAGE THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT SITE. NOTE: CADD FILES FOR ESTIMATING EARTHWORK QUANTITIES ARE AVAILABLE TO CONTRACTORS FOR PREPARING BIDS. IN ORDER TO RECEIVE THE CADD FILES, THE CONTRACTOR WILL NEED TO SIGN A HOLD -HARMLESS AGREEMENT PROVIDED BY SCHULTZ ENGINEERING & SITE DESIGN, AND AGREE TO PAY A $50 PROCESSING FEE. THE CADD FILES WILL BE RELEASED UPON RECEIPT OF THE CHECK W J Q L m W O m` 01 N c� 0 Z N N U J 0 0 N L0 0 1010 O MF1 v (5 00 O Z 0 T- i i N I..L C0 (0 Z c @) w CD C ffo 0c) w _ M CO N Z Q_ li U ' ^ Q v O Z C W w .N N~ W Z) Ax 2 W Q vJ L 1 N� > z �0 \ 0 N — \` O 07N �WW z `) 0z Q J� Z LU 0 F- U w Z w O IL V) ~ Z O U CIO (�o > LU w Z o 0 o 0 V) LU O N (1) v Q:� Z V Z n Q W L/) Q w0 LU W Z Q Q Z 0 0 Z Do J � W 0 �U O Z U o0 GRADING PLAN PROJECT a� NUMBER: 17029 N , SCALE: 1 =20' 0 0 20 40 80 r- C3 OF 8 Holiday Gas Station Sign RETAINING WALL NOTE: REMOVE EXISTING LENGTH = 26 LF HEIGHT �(0 TO 2 -FT PAVEMENT AND CURB & GUTTER TYPE: MODULAR BLOC AS NECESSARY FOR NEW COLOR: NEUTRAL GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION Edge of Concretes coy REMOVE EXISTING PAVEMENT AND CURB & GUTTER (TYP) 953.97 i Concrete Curb (B612) #Ill Bca�lgi�h9 Storm Sewer Manhole RIM = 955.78 Storm Sewer Manhole RIM = 956.19 Catch Basin RIM = 956,00 INV = 953.07 24" Surmountabl Sanitary Sewer Manhole RIM = 959.62 Catch Basin Concrete Curb RIM = 955,90 \ Concrete Curb (B618) Sanitary Sewer RIM = 959.41 INV N = 945.11 Catch BaAin RIM = 958.97 Storm Sewer RIM = 959.41 INV = 953.24 Catch Basin RIM = 958.95 Storm Sewer Manhole RIM = 959.16 �IBenchmark oncrete Curb NOTE: THE CITY WILL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY ADDITIONAL COSTS INCURRED THAT IS ASSOCIATED WITH VARIATIONS IN THE UTILITY AS -BUILT ELEVATIONS, OR PIPE SIZES AND MATERIAL TYPES. THESE ITEMS SHALL BE VERIFIED IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. Catch Basin RIM = 957,31 Catch Basir RIM = 957.4 Storm Sewer Manhole RIM = 957.95 GENERAL GRADING NOTES: 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS INCLUDING LOCATIONS, AND RIM AND INVERT ELEVATIONS, OF EXISTING DRAINAGE AND SANITARY STRUCTURES. LOCATION AND SIZE OF EXISTING SANITARY, WATER, AND STORM SEWER STUBS, AND EXISTING GRADES SHALL ALSO BE VERIFIED. 2. EXISTING TOPOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION WAS OBTAINED FROM A TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY PROVIDED BY WEBB SURVEYING, MAPLE LAKE, MN (763) 898-9999. 3. BENCHMARK: TOP NUT OF HYDRANT LOCATED ON NORTHEAST SIDE OF OAKWOOD DRIVE (SEE PLAN) - ELEV = 959.37 (NGVD '88 DATUM) 4. NOTIFY ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF ANY INCONSISTENCIES ARE DISCOVERED BETWEEN ACTUAL SITE CONDITIONS AND WHAT IS SHOWN ON THE PLANS, WHICH ARE SIGNIFICANT ENOUGH TO ALTER THE INTENT OF THE DRAWINGS. 5. IF REQUIRED BY THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY, THE OWNER OR CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A PLUMBING PERMIT PRIOR TO THE INSTALLATION OF ANY STORM SEWER UTILITIES. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER ONE CALL AT (800) 252-1166 FOR A UTILITY LOCATE PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION AND VERIFY LOCATIONS OF UTILITIES BEFORE BEGINNING WORK. 7. SEE SHEET C2 FOR STANDARD DETAILS. 8. HDPE STORM SEWER CROSSING ABOVE AND WITHIN 10 -FT OF EXISTING OR PROPOSED WATER MAIN OR SERVICES SHALL MEET THE FOLLOWING STANDARDS PER THE MN PLUMBING CODE: 4"- 10" DIAMETER: AASHTO M252 12" - 60" DIAMETER: ASTM F2306 FITTINGS: ASTM D3212 SEE SHEET C6 FOR LOCATIONS OF NEW WATER MAIN AND SERVICES. 9. FINISHED ELEVATIONS OF LAWN/GREEN AREAS ADJACENT TO BUILDINGS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 6" BELOW FINISHED FLOOR OR TOP -OF -BLOCK ELEVATION. 10. CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM CALCULATIONS TO VERIFY EARTHWORK QUANTITIES. CONTRACTOR'S BID SHALL BE BASED ON EARTHWORK CALCULATIONS COMPLETED BY THE CONTRACTOR 11. SPOT ELEVATIONS ARE FLOW LINE AND/OR FINISHED GRADES, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. TOP OF CURB ELEVATIONS ARE 6" ABOVE THE FLOW LINE SPOT ELEVATION SHOWN ON THE PLANS, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 12. "EX" DENOTES EXISTING SPOT ELEVATIONS 13. ALL PROPOSED ELEVATIONS ARE TOP OF PAVING OR GUTTER, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. PROPOSED ELEVATIONS ARE INTENDED TO PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE TOWARDS CATCH BASINS AND/OR OUTLETS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO PROVIDE THE REQUIRED ELEVATIONS, WHICH WILL PROMOTE POSITIVE DRAINAGE THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT SITE. NOTE: CADD FILES FOR ESTIMATING EARTHWORK QUANTITIES ARE AVAILABLE TO CONTRACTORS FOR PREPARING BIDS. IN ORDER TO RECEIVE THE CADD FILES, THE CONTRACTOR WILL NEED TO SIGN A HOLD -HARMLESS AGREEMENT PROVIDED BY SCHULTZ ENGINEERING & SITE DESIGN, AND AGREE TO PAY A $50 PROCESSING FEE. THE CADD FILES WILL BE RELEASED UPON RECEIPT OF THE CHECK W J Q L m W O m` 01 N c� 0 Z N N U J 0 0 N L0 0 1010 O MF1 v (5 00 O Z 0 T- i i N I..L C0 (0 Z c @) w CD C ffo 0c) w _ M CO N Z Q_ li U ' ^ Q v O Z C W w .N N~ W Z) Ax 2 W Q vJ L 1 N� > z �0 \ 0 N — \` O 07N �WW z `) 0z Q J� Z LU 0 F- U w Z w O IL V) ~ Z O U CIO (�o > LU w Z o 0 o 0 V) LU O N (1) v Q:� Z V Z n Q W L/) Q w0 LU W Z Q Q Z 0 0 Z Do J � W 0 �U O Z U o0 GRADING PLAN PROJECT a� NUMBER: 17029 N , SCALE: 1 =20' 0 0 20 40 80 r- C3 OF 8 PROJECT INFORMATION Project Description This project will consist of the construction of a new commercial retail building with an approximate footprint of 5,000 SF, as well as bituminous parking lot and concrete sidewalk areas. Disturbed Area & Impervious Surface Tabulation (within proposed construction area) Anticipated Disturbed Area 0.6 acres Existing Impervious Area 0.21 acres Proposed Impervious Area 0.48 acres Net Impervious Area Increase 0.27 acres Permanent Site Drainage The proposed project is designed to drain to an existing 15" storm sewer stub located near the north corner of the project site via new private storm sewer to be constructed as part of the project. Receivinq Surface Waters The following surface waters could receive storm water runoff from this project, and are within 1 mile of the project site: Surface Water Type of Impaired Special USEPA Approved TMDL Comments Surface Water Water? Water? for Impaired Water? Project not subject to NPDES Permit SEDIMENT AND OTHER POLLUTANTS This SWPPP has been designed mainly to provide erosion and sediment control of naturally occurring soils at this site (ie: sands, foams, and clays). Although this SWPPP does address pollution prevention of other man-made materials, it is assumed that these materials will consist of debris from existing structures and pavements to be demolished, or debris and chemicals (ie: fuels, new paints, etc.) resulting from new construction. There are no known solid wastes or hazardous materials buried below grade at this site. If such wastes or hazard materials are discovered during construction, the SWPPP Coordinator (described below) will be responsible for notifying the Engineer. This SWPPP will then be revised to address he presence and disposal of these additional pollutants EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS Standards and References Materials and construction methods of all BMPs included in this SWPPP shall be as per the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MNDOT) Standard Specifications for Construction, latest edition. The Contractor and SWPPP Coordinator shall obtain a current copy of MNDOT's Standard Specifications for Construction and familiarize themselves with the specification sections applicable to this SWPPP, as there are several BMPs that specifically reference these sections. The Contractor and SWPPP Coordinator shall be expected to be familiar with the applicable MNDOT specification sections during construction. No additional compensation will be paid to the Contractor for additional work due to unfamiliarity with these specification sections. Undisturbed Areas If shown on the plan, the Contractor shall delineate areas that are not to be disturbed on the site. This may be done with flags, stakes, signs, silt fence, etc., and shall be completed prior to the start of any grading operations. Regardless of the delineation method the Contractor chooses to use, the Contractor must communicate to his/her personnel and subcontractors that these areas are not to be disturbed and construction equipment (including trucks and personal vehicles) shall not be allowed in these areas. The Contractor shall minimize compaction and preserve topsoil as much as possible at the site. In pervious ("green") areas that are not essential to the construction of the project, the Contractor shall avoid construction traffic and maintain the existing condition of these areas. Temporary and Permanent Stabilization All exposed soil areas (including stockpiles) shall be provided with temporary or permanent cover within 14 days of construction activity temporarily or permanently ceasing in that portion of the site. Temporary or permanent drainage ditches or swales, which drain off-site or to a surface water, and are within 200 lineal feet of the property line or surface water shall be provided with temporary or permanent cover within 24 hours of construction. Placement of temporary or permanent cover shall be initiated immediately upon suspension or completion of excavation operations. Temporary Cover: If the Contractor chooses to halt grading operations in a portion of the site (or the whole site) for a period exceeding 14 days, and grading operations (rough or finish grading) in the affected areas has not yet been completed, temporary cover shall be placed. Affected areas consisting of drainage ditches or swales connected to, and within, 200 lineal feet of a property line or surface water shall be provided with temporary cover within 24 hours of connection. Depending on the Contractor's schedule, the temporary cover shall consist of one of the following BMPs: 1). Discanchored Mulch a). Discanchored mulch may be used in an area of the site (or the whole site) if the Contractor is halting grading operations for a period that is relatively short, but exceeds 14 days. b). The mulch shall be Type 3 per MNDOT Spec. 3882 c). An adequate quantity of mulch shall be evenly distributed to achieve 90% coverage of the exposed soils. d). Mulch shall be placed as per MNDOT 2575.3F. e). All mulch shall be disc anchored as per MNDOT 2575.3G. Prior to the placement and discanchoring of the mulch, the soils shall be loosened and the area smooth -rough graded per MNDOT 2575.3B1. f). Any areas that are exposed as a result of wind action after the initial mulch placement shall be covered with additional mulch to maintain 90% coverage. 2). Temporary Seeding with Mulch a). Temporary seeding with mulch may be used in areas of the site (or the whole site) if the Contractor is halting grading operations for a period that is relatively long. Although mulch still needs to be applied as described above, once the temporary seeding/turf is established, the mulch will no longer need to be maintained. The temporary seeding/turf will require very little maintenance. b). Prior to the sowing of temporary seed, the soils shall be loosened and the area smooth -rough graded per MNDOT 2575.361. c). Contractor shall utilize Seed Mixes 100, 110, or 130 per MNDOT Spec. 3876 for temporary seeding. d). Temporary seeding shall be sown per MNDOT Spec. 2575.3D. e). Once temporary seeding has been sown, mulch shall be placed over the area as described above. Permanent Cover: Upon completion of finish grading and/or placement of topsoil, initiation of the placement of permanent cover shall begin immediately over all exposed areas. This includes areas designated for impervious surfacing (ie: buildings, pavements/gravel bases, sidewalks, etc.). Where the construction schedule will not allow for the placement of the permanent impervious surfacing within 14 days of the completion of finish grading, temporary cover shall be provided in these areas, as described above, until the permanent impervious surfacing can be constructed. Affected areas consisting of drainage ditches or swales connected to, and within, 200 lineal feet of a property line or surface water, shall be provided with permanent cover within 24 hours of connection. Areas designated for permanent turf establishment shall be provided with one or more of the following BMPs (see plan): 1). Permanent Seeding with Mulch a). Unless otherwise noted on the plans, all areas designated for turf establishment shall be provided with permanent seeding. b). In addition to the plan included as part of this SWPPP, the Contractor shall verify if a Landscaping Plan has been included in the plans by the Architect. If a Landscape Architect has specified higher quality permanent cover (ie: sod, hydroseeding, etc.), the Contractor shall provide this permanent cover in lieu of the permanent seeding specified in this SWPPP. c). Prior to the sowing of permanent seed, the soils shall be loosened and the area smooth -rough graded per MNDOT 2575.361. d). Contractor shall utilize Seed Mix 260 per MNDOT Spec. 3876 for permanent seeding. e). Permanent seeding shall be sown per MNDOT Spec. 2575.3D. f). Once permanent seeding has been sown, mulch shall be placed over the area as described above (under Temporary Cover), unless noted otherwise. 2). Erosion Control Blanket a). Erosion control blanket shall be placed in areas as shown on the plan included in this SWPPP. These areas shall still be provided with permanent seeding, as described above, beneath the erosion control blanket. b). Erosion control blanket shall meet the requirements indicated in MNDOT Spec. 3885. See plan for category(s) of erosion control blanket. c). Erosion control blanket shall be installed as per MNDOT Spec. 2575.3J2. d). Erosion control blanket specified in drainage ditches and swales connected to, and within 200 lineal feet, of a property line or surface water shall be installed within 24 hours of the completion of finish grading (including permanent seeding). 3). Riprap a). Riprap shall be placed in areas as shown on the plan included in this SWPPP. b). All riprap shall be underlain with Type 4 geotextile fabric. The fabric shall meet the requirements of MNDOT Spec. 3733 and shall be installed as per MNDOT Spec. 2511.3B2. c). Riprap materials shall meet the requirements of MNDOT Spec. 3601, and shall be Class 3, unless noted otherwise on the plans. d). Riprap shall be considered "Random Riprap" and shall be placed as per MNDOT Spec. 2511. e). Although it is permitted for the riprap to be placed with machinery, it will be necessary for the Contractor to hand place some of the riprap in order to provide a dense, well -keyed layer of stones with the least practical quantity of void space. f). The minimum thickness of the riprap shall be 18 inches, unless otherwise noted on the plans. g). Riprap designated at the end of pipe outlets shall be placed within 24 hours of installation of the pipe outlet end section. h). Riprap specified in drainage ditches and swales connected to, and within 200 lineal feet, of a property line or surface water shall be installed within 24 hours of the completion of finish grading. Sediment Control The following sediment control BMPs shall be implemented as part of this project: 1). Silt Fence a). Silt fence shall be installed at the locations shown on the plan included in this SWPPP. b). Silt fence shall be machine sliced and materials shall meet the requirements of MNDOT Spec. 3886. c). Silt fence shall be installed as per MNDOT Spec. 2573.3C1. d). Silt fence shall be installed prior to any upgradient grading operations, and shall remain in place and maintained adequately until upgradient areas achieve Final Stabilization (see below) e). Silt fence shall be repaired or replaced if damaged during, or after, rain events, or if accumulated sediment on the upstream side of the fence reaches 1/3 of the height of the fence. Repair or replacement of silt fence shall be completed within 24 hours of discovery. f). Portions of silt fence may be removed to accommodate short-term activities, such as vehicle passage. Short-term activities shall be completed as quickly as possible, and new silt fence installed immediately after completion of the short-term activity. If rainfall is imminent or forecasted in the near future, new silt shall be installed regardless of if the short term activity has been completed or not. The Contractor is advised to schedule short term activities during dry weather as much as practicable. No additional compensation will be paid due to additional silt fence associated with short-term activities. g). Temporary soil stockpiles shall be placed on the site in areas upgradient from silt fence. Where the Contractor chooses to place temporary soil stockpiles outside designated silt fenced areas, the stockpiles shall be surrounded by additional silt fence. Under no circumstances shall temporary soil stockpiles be placed over surface waters, curb and gutter, catch basins, culvert inlets or outlets, or ditches. 2). Catch Basin Protection a). WIMCO Road Drain protection devices, as manufactured by WIMCO, shall be used for catch basin protection on this project. WIMCO can be contacted at (952)-233-3055, and their web page is www.roaddrain.com. b). "Road Drain Top Slab" devices shall be installed at all catch basin locations immediately after placement of the catch basin structures. "Road Drain Top Slab" devices shall remain in place and be adequately maintained until permanent surfacing is constructed (ie: curb and gutter, pavements, and/or gravel surfacing). In areas designated for turf establishment, "Road Drain Top Slab" devices shall remain in place until Final Stabilization of all upgradient areas is established. c). Upon construction of the permanent surfacing, the "Road Drain Top Slab" devices shall be replaced with the WIMCO product specified on the plans. The WIMCO devices shall remain in place until Final Stabilization of all upgradient areas has been established. d). The contractor shall install and maintain the catch basin protection devices as per the manufacturer's instructions and specifications. 3). Culvert Inlet Protection a). Culvert inlet protection shall be provided at all culvert inlet locations immediately after construction of the culvert. See plan included in this SWPPP for culvert inlet locations. b). Culvert inlet protection shall consist of geotextile fabric wrapped around, and completely covering the inlet end section. The geotextile fabric shall be the same fabric used in silt fence applications and meet the requirements of MNDOT Spec. 3886. c). The culvert inlet protection shall remain in place and adequately maintained until Final Stabilization of all upgradient areas has been established. d). Culvert inlet protection shall be repaired or replaced if damaged during, or after, rain events, or if accumulated sediment reaches 1/2 of the diameter of the culvert pipe. Repair or replacement of culvert inlet protection shall be completed within 24 hours of discovery. 4). Temporary Rock Construction Entrance a). Temporary rock construction entrances shall be installed at the locations shown on the plan included in this SWPPP. See detail for temporary rock entrance design. b). If the Contractor chooses to access the site from locations other than where temporary rock entrances are specified on the plans, additional temporary rock entrances shall be placed at these locations, as well. c). Temporary rock entrance shall be constructed prior to the start of grading operations, and shall remain in place and be adequately maintained until Final Stabilization has been established. d). Temporary rock entrances shall be maintained in such a manner that the entrances prevent sediment tracking onto adjacent streets. If a temporary rock entrance is found to be ineffective, it shall be replaced or improved within 24 hours of discovery. e). The Contractor has the option to place Type 4 geotextile fabric beneath the temporary rock entrance. The fabric may extend the life of the entrance as it will reduce rock "sinking" into the underlying soils. If the Contractor chooses to use fabric, it should meet the requirements of MNDOT Spec. 3733 and shall be installed as per MNDOT Spec. 2511.3B2. f). If sediment tracking from the site is discovered on adjacent streets, the sediment shall be removed with a street sweeper or other approved method within 24 hours of discovery. This shall be done throughout construction of the project. This sediment may be returned and graded over exposed areas of the site, or disposed of off site per MPCA requirements. The City may order street sweeping to be performed at the Contractor's or Owner's expense if City staff find that construction activities are resulting in sediment or debris being tracked onto City streets. 5). Filter Logs a). Filter logs shall be installed at the locations shown on the plan included in this SWPPP. b). Filter logs shall consist of Type Wood Fiber biorolls and meet the requirements of MNDOT Spec. 3897. c). Filter logs shall be installed as per MNDOT Spec. 2573.3-1. d). Filter logs shall be installed immediately after placement of erosion control blanket. e). Filter logs shall remain in place for the life of the project, and shall be allowed to degrade naturally. Dewatering If dewatering of sandy subsoils is required for this project, the pump discharge shall be treated prior to discharge off-site or into a surface water. Treatment of discharge shall be achieved with the use of a "Dandy Dewatering Bag" (or approved equivalent), as manufactured by Dandy Products,lnc. Dandy Products, Inc. can be contacted at (877) 307-0141, and their web page is www.dandyproducts.com. The "Dandy Dewatering Bag" shall be installed, utilized, and maintained per the manufacturer's instructions and specifications. Once dewatering water has been treated, it may be discharged off-site or to a surface water. The discharge shall be visually checked to ensure that it is relatively clean and not visibly different from any receiving waters. If discharge is noticeably "dirty", the Engineer shall be contacted as additional treatment methods may be necessary. Adequate erosion control shall be provided at the point of discharge if it is located in an area with exposed soils or established turf. This erosion control may consist of temporarily placed rip rap, or other approved energy dissipation measures. The type of erosion control measure shall be at the Contractor's discretion, depending on the location of the dewatering discharge and the unique site characteristics. The erosion control measures shall be effective and shall be maintained adequately such that no erosion occurs at the point of discharge. Pollution Prevention Manaqement Solid waste accumulated during construction, including collected sediment, construction materials, floating debris, construction debris, paper, plastics, and other solid wastes shall be disposed of in accordance with MPCA disposal requirements: 1). Building products that have the potential to leach pollutants shall be maintained under cover (e.g., plastic sheeting or temporary roofs) to prevent the discharge of pollutants or protected by a similarly effective means designed to minimize contact with storm water. 2). Pesticides, herbicides, insecticides, fertilizers, treatment chemicals, and landscape materials shall be maintained under cover (e.g., plastic sheeting or temporary roofs) to prevent the discharge of pollutants or protected by similarly effective means designed to minimize contact with stormwater. 3). Hazardous materials, toxic waste, (including oil, diesel fuel, gasoline, hydraulic fluids, paint solvents, petroleum-based products, wood preservatives, additives, curing compounds, and acids) shall be properly stored in sealed containers to prevent spills, leaks or other discharge. Restricted access storage areas shall be provided to prevent vandalism. Storage and disposal of hazardous waste or hazardous materials shall be in compliance with Minn. R. ch. 7045 including secondary containment as applicable. 4). Solid waste shall be stored, collected and disposed of properly in compliance with Minn. R. ch. 7035. 5). Portable toilets shall be positioned so that they are secure and will not be tipped or knocked over Sanitary waste must be disposed of properly in accordance with Minn. R. ch. 7041. The Contractor shall take steps to prevent the discharge of spilled or leaked chemicals, including fuel, from any area where chemicals or fuel will be loaded or unloaded including the use of drip pans or absorbents unless infeasible. The Contractor shall conduct fueling in a contained area unless infeasible. The Contractor shall ensure adequate supplies are available at all times to clean up discharged materials and that an appropriate disposal method is available for recovered spilled mate(als. The Contractor shall report and clean up spills immediately as required by Minn. Stat. § 115.061, using dry clean up measures where possible. If the Contractor washes the exterior of vehicles or equipment on the project site, washing shall be limited to a defined area of the site. Runoff from the washing area shall be contained in a sediment basin or other similarly effective controls and waste from the washing activity shall be properly disposed of. The Contractor shall properly use and store soaps, detergents, or solvents. No engine degreasing shall be allowed on site. The Contractor shall provide effective containment for all liquid and solid wastes generated by washout operations (concrete, stucco, paint, form release oils, curing compounds and other construction materials) related to the construction activity. The liquid and solid washout wastes shall not contact the ground, and the containment shall be designed so that it does not result in runoff from the washout operations or areas. Liquid and solid wastes shall be disposed of properly and in compliance with MPCA rules. A sign must be installed adjacent to each washout facility that requires site personnel to utilize the proper facilities for disposal of concrete and other washout wastes. FINAL STABILIZATION Final Stabilization shall be considered established once the following requirements have been achieved: 1). All soil disturbing activities at the site have been completed and all soils are stabilized by a uniform perennial vegetative cover with a density of 70 percent of its expected final growth density over the entire pervious surface area, or other equivalent means necessary to prevent soil failure under erosive conditions 2). The permanent storm water management system is constructed, and is operating as designed. Temporary or permanent sedimentation basins that are to be used as permanent water quality management basins have been cleaned of any accumulated sediment. All sediment has been removed from conveyance systems and ditches are stabilized with permanent cover. 3). All temporary synthetic and structural erosion prevention and sediment control BMPs have been removed from the project site. BMPs designed to decompose on site may be left in place. SWPPP NOTES W U) J Q L m W a� 0 Z I n o- n Cn N O U O � C O 0 E LQR O E N N N U -0 U N C — 0- � N N Q N aE O � � a N N i Q O 70 O N C Z) a U O O — Q)0 N— C N O N .— C N QQO)C N D C U) w LU o_ O m` a` N M O Z V) N U J O N LO 0 1010 O M� F1 v (0 00 O Z or" co (0 I..L Z c @) LTJ CD N ffo co) UJ _ MCO N Z li -c ' ^ v Q U O Z C W UJ .N N��~^ vJ C C J (D Ax W C 2 Q N vJ _0 LCO L q N > Z 1 � \ O 4-1 0 N — \` O N 00 :3 T-- Z O o' U LU cn w Z O o LU O � Z V Z LU Z 0^/ U PROJECT NUMBER: 17029 Z LU O U U rV LU 0 - Ln Z O > LU Q W 0 LU LU > Z Q Z 0 0b 0 00 w CE � C a zE C:) 3 O 2 a W ff E, Z W0_ + } N ° N Q o m U —O N • II d 01 MOIL N Em 0� 0 II U U ow I I LZ C) J W ff Fln O_ Z W0_ =I'J 00 fa ow NO rw K C O T� } d 01 MOIL N >'. Noaa >QQ Llm u2>� N� J r z z H tL ¢J¢ m r N M d II 9 W O O U II U m Q 0 Oi W N ZW r LU0 I� I O i Q c ; c � : (D U i Q O 0O LoO U J U zo � II (O�) O O LLJzw 5wzw O Q Q -C-Q):)L� o� 4_= IL w r ¢ a O ww XU p nw -N mow w 11 L� O wzL`� z I m OF Q�a��a11 W r� wg w w X �o wz Cn zV� Z o�rW NJ�Y M � 1 V W. ¢ (Qnw W Q =W. Lil C9 zio r�M U LU U ¢O Jo rw m W �� OOO_' w Zing} F— frnr 0¢ r� ¢� wm OJ r mew � JOx¢ II II O' 200zOV W �Wzo O— wZ� WE y w wa ��II a¢Iow Z< D O 0 0 A CALL TO GOPHER STATE ONE (454-0002) mor QEa�U aw 0-J 2 rw J� IIS IS REQUIRED A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS 2 LO a o�o� a Lb `'� �i L a > 1 \ \\ N O N Wwwm M �I¢i _jM �w wU �� = r Of o0 3 II Y z a zm ow z� i''IX ° ii c ¢F p0 �J F -w w� zU L II m I I 0_F-�a 00 o'r m w �_cr!-I 'z JO fid' WL Or= r Nw LLJ In Q w¢ > N N wo w o a w wo QQ c o rn NL ZO MNr >O F� Lew ZW Wr w= Q m 2 '6m(n0 r HCL L" °> W Zpww2 pd wm �= w� N^tea � mw 20— ww �} �J oUN ¢w o� p� aZ °mv II a v'1 r 'In _ NWN� I<OPK< w i>wa Fmw fW � NU�Z Ow¢ �¢ ZD Em ° II o0 OF CL x¢U �rN F- r No IIJ _j (n rp wQ �¢ O� w= �} cep zr v a`>� o °. Up OrN m pWow J O_ ® wo NW Ww zp M,� 0_I.�UO_ UMW W 00z `a-� - ? J d m Q Li I I �g_3 r� W a W Q m O g W N W <=)ZO wMW� WQ.¢ �wv J N w m Z Q O O O= m m FN C I I 00 <0::!. o wO / ?N� o J ¢ = mr Na Nw II vmma ¢ O mo o�o ZMOO =tea Q W w W =w v>(3 Z Uo -Mz Q¢ U¢ N U np.m WJ O Q o U I I Ir-S�r ¢F�$-.� mWM cl J Mao li �-'. - p N W w I— � o II �o d;' ZI �o :12.5 w a� �w oN Ui,'l mow II Q��p z mz Dm WN w_ ry a Q E' 0] U O_ W J_ Li. Z W O LL, (n Q L.� O Z O_ I— U 7D ry U) Z O U z Q Z W W U Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Gravel pad(s) MnDOT Class CA -15 or CA -25 Riprap Bedding - Geotextile fuu Title: Residential Building Erosion Control Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised: 0315 6006 - -------- - - -- Original Geotextile fabric grade SECTION B -B (not to scale) +ooI plates NOTES: Channelize runoff to sediment trapping device CD z cn xl w Match Existing Grade 2 JLV IMV n n (not to scale) Sediment Trapping Device Original grade 0 0 E 0 S O U -p 6 C Wo vl 1%1 lj i v. -y PLAN Title: Commercial Gravel Standard Plate Library Construction Entrance City of Monticello Date:_ Plate No. 0614 6002 Revised: 03-15 -------/ I/I Title: Inlet Protection Standard Plate Library iCatch Basin Insert City of Monticello i Date: 03-07 Plate No. ��- Revised:6 0 0 4 03-15 10% MAX 0 LU-LwU1 (@ EXISTING 12' MIN --I C❑NSTRUCTI❑N MATS, WOVEN OR TRIM PAVED ROADWAY 50' MIS: END OVERLAP 18' MIN TRM END OVERLAP WITH SPIKES OR STAKES STRAP CONNECTORS CONSTRUCTION MAT END OVERLAP INTERL❑CK WITH STRAP CONNECTORS J Q U 0- r DISTURBED AREA, CONSTRUCTI❑N SITE, STABILIZED STORAGE AREA OR STAGING AREA SIDE OVERLAP END OVERLAP _ h 0 C .0 0 o 3 o 03 I� 0 0 0 1 PAD AREA (ANY SIZE) SIDE o > /OVERLAP 0 o c o 0 o c o o > O 0 C 0 0 > Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Title: Mud Mat Entrance Date: 06-14 Plate No. Revised: 6003 06-14 / - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WING NUT OVERFLOW SLOT IN SHROUD ATTACHMENT HOOK SILT FABRIC SLEEVE • • • • PER MnDOT SPECIAL • • • • o PROVISION 3886 e••••o II I I ..c a A �T A - . a. a Q . .v� d . G ON OVERFLOW SLOT IN SHROUD r SILT FABRIC SLEEVE PER MnDOT SPECIAL PROVISION 3886 - - Ttle - Inlet Protection Standard Plate Library Grate Inlet Cover City of Monticello Date: 03-07 Plate No. Revised: 6005 03-15 -- - ---- - - - - -- ----- / SWPPP DETAILS ff WwMzl.l > Z W0_ =I'J 00 fa ow NO rw II C O T� } d _j N >'. Noaa z Llm u2>� N� a� Q N H tL ¢J¢ m N M d II 3 � O �U U 00 <1 N D r LU0 I� I O IL N CD U � : (D U i Q O 0O LoO U U C) O 10 N O O c x3V (O�) O O LLJzw 5wzw O Q Q -C-Q):)L� m IL rv>^W vO II O Z frn U oz¢ F¢m L� O wzL`� z I EY oT 3 ii m w aOUj _jcan zV� Z o�rW NJ�Y M � 1 Z � V J II v N C9 zio r�M U LU U Z �� W �� OOO_' w Zing} F— L O> C V) JOx¢ CL U_ O' 200zOV W 2 0_ wZ� WE y w a¢Iow Z< D O 0 0 A CALL TO GOPHER STATE ONE (454-0002) U/ N U r w = r F m N (.0 IS REQUIRED A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS 2 LO O r W = N OC z 121i:1- z PRIOR TO PERFORMING ANY EXCAVATION. Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Gravel pad(s) MnDOT Class CA -15 or CA -25 Riprap Bedding - Geotextile fuu Title: Residential Building Erosion Control Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised: 0315 6006 - -------- - - -- Original Geotextile fabric grade SECTION B -B (not to scale) +ooI plates NOTES: Channelize runoff to sediment trapping device CD z cn xl w Match Existing Grade 2 JLV IMV n n (not to scale) Sediment Trapping Device Original grade 0 0 E 0 S O U -p 6 C Wo vl 1%1 lj i v. -y PLAN Title: Commercial Gravel Standard Plate Library Construction Entrance City of Monticello Date:_ Plate No. 0614 6002 Revised: 03-15 -------/ I/I Title: Inlet Protection Standard Plate Library iCatch Basin Insert City of Monticello i Date: 03-07 Plate No. ��- Revised:6 0 0 4 03-15 10% MAX 0 LU-LwU1 (@ EXISTING 12' MIN --I C❑NSTRUCTI❑N MATS, WOVEN OR TRIM PAVED ROADWAY 50' MIS: END OVERLAP 18' MIN TRM END OVERLAP WITH SPIKES OR STAKES STRAP CONNECTORS CONSTRUCTION MAT END OVERLAP INTERL❑CK WITH STRAP CONNECTORS J Q U 0- r DISTURBED AREA, CONSTRUCTI❑N SITE, STABILIZED STORAGE AREA OR STAGING AREA SIDE OVERLAP END OVERLAP _ h 0 C .0 0 o 3 o 03 I� 0 0 0 1 PAD AREA (ANY SIZE) SIDE o > /OVERLAP 0 o c o 0 o c o o > O 0 C 0 0 > Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Title: Mud Mat Entrance Date: 06-14 Plate No. Revised: 6003 06-14 / - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WING NUT OVERFLOW SLOT IN SHROUD ATTACHMENT HOOK SILT FABRIC SLEEVE • • • • PER MnDOT SPECIAL • • • • o PROVISION 3886 e••••o II I I ..c a A �T A - . a. a Q . .v� d . G ON OVERFLOW SLOT IN SHROUD r SILT FABRIC SLEEVE PER MnDOT SPECIAL PROVISION 3886 - - Ttle - Inlet Protection Standard Plate Library Grate Inlet Cover City of Monticello Date: 03-07 Plate No. Revised: 6005 03-15 -- - ---- - - - - -- ----- / SWPPP DETAILS �-- Q LJJ 0 w LU iz7 Q Z 25 OD OJ J LL Q Oz ff __j J d� O L J 01 W C O T� } d _j N z Q U U W Q N Q J Z 3: 0 3 � ^� L.L �U U 0 N D r LU0 I� r O IL N CD U � : (D U i Q O 0O LoO U U C) O 10 N O O c w (O�) O O O Q Q -C-Q):)L� m IL rv>^W vO O Z 0 r U z I EY co (6 5Z w V C LIJ M � 1 Z � V J a LL _C C9 0 U N O LU U Z C � W w �' .F N F— �J�) C V) w O N N W 2 Q O 0 0 U/ N N (.0 2 LO O r N OC z 121i:1- z O ate- Cr) \ \\ N O N U) 4- -U)(n U) U) �-- Q LJJ 0 w LU iz7 Q Z 25 OD OJ J LL Q Oz ff __j Z d� J J EG �-- Q LJJ 0 w LU iz7 Q Z 25 OD OJ J LL Q Oz V Z J_ W z J_ Q LU W L.� Q m Z 3: 0 3 � ^� L.L �U U 0 PROJECT r NUMBER: 17029 CV O U w z IL O z O w LU o � V) w 00 O 0 0 N LU O r N M N't 121i:1- z �-- Q LJJ 0 w LU iz7 Q Z 25 OD OJ J LL Q Oz V Z J_ W J_ Q I— W L.� Q m Z 3: �0 3 � ^� L.L �U 0 PROJECT NUMBER: 17029 CV O �-- Q LJJ 0 w LU iz7 Q Z 25 OD OJ J LL Q Oz Catch Basin Concrete Curb Storm Sewer Manhole RIM = 955.90 \ RIM = 955.78 - coy (� c, Snnitnry CPwar Monhnlo "I L- tch Basir A = 957.4 lanho(e SWPPP PLAN I 0 20 40 80 z `3 0z Q J� z W O U F- U z W O IL V) F z O U CIO U) > W W 0 ry U O N W U) O M J U c O O z a ;= N N N U U •_ N N F � Q = N V) N O N U ry� (�CC� LU Q:� O z Ln N U) _r_ _ — } — } � Q) 0 W i W U � -7 N N 0 i Q 0 N LO L O U U 0 0 O 0 N O c*C _ i n W < m o (Dco Z 0 T- 6(� Z �(05 W CD C f 2 LL] _ co 00 N ZL W ' ^ Q v U O Z U W ui .N ~ N �06 = Q a > z� -r- 0 \ 0 N — \` .0000 O CD ZN 00 '5 cz rU)U) z `3 0z Q J� z W O U F- U z W O IL V) F z O U CIO U) > W W 0 ry V z n J_ :D m Q W L/) Q w0 LULU Z Q Qz m o� z O00 � W 0 �U it O z o U o0 PROJECT NUMBER: 17029 N , Cf) SCALE: 1''=20' 0 C6 OF 8 Z 0 o o 0 V) LU Q:� O z N (1) v V z n J_ :D m Q W L/) Q w0 LULU Z Q Qz m o� z O00 � W 0 �U it O z o U o0 PROJECT NUMBER: 17029 N , Cf) SCALE: 1''=20' 0 C6 OF 8 I Catch Basin Concrete Curb Storm Sewer Manhole RIM = 955.90 \ RIM = 955.78 - coy Snnitnry CPwar Monhnlo �� tch Basir A = 957.4 lanhole UTILITY NOTES: 1. WATER MAIN AND ANY WATER SERVICE LINES SHALL BE PLACED AT A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 8 FEET BELOW FINISHED GRADE. 2. IF CONFLICTS ARE DISCOVERED WHERE WATER MAIN CROSSES EXISTING SANITARY SEWER, SERVICE LINES, OR STORM SEWER, THE WATER MAIN SHALL BE RAISED OR LOWERED APPROPRIATELY WHILE STILL MAINTAINING A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 8 FEET BELOW FINISHED GRADE. 3. INSULATION SHALL BE PLACED AT ALL LOCATIONS WHERE STORM SEWER CROSSES SANITARY SEWER, WATER MAIN, OR ASSOCIATED SERVICES. INSULATION SHALL CONSIST OF AN 8 -FT X 8 -FT SQUARE OF 3" -THICK RIGID INSULATION. INSULATION SHALL BE PLACED BETWEEN THE STORM SEWER AND PIPE CROSSING WITH THE EDGES OF THE INSULATION PARALLEL TO THE PIPING AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE. 4. INSTALL SANITARY SEWER SERVICE LINE CLEANOUTS AS REQUIRED BY THE MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE 5. SEE SHEET C3 FOR STORM SEWER GRADING, AND SHEET C2 FOR MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS RELATING TO THE PLACEMENT OF THE UTILITIES. b. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION. 7. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OF SANITARY SEWER, AND ORDERING ASSOCIATED MATERIALS, THE CONTRACTOR'S PLUMBING DESIGNER SHALL PROVIDE THE ENGINEER WITH THE TOTAL DRAINAGE FIXTURE UNITS (DFUs) FOR THE INTERIOR PLUMBING TO VERIFY THE CORRECT SIZING AND SLOPE OF THE SANITARY SEWER SERVICE OWNER/CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A PLUMBING PERMIT FROM THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY PRIOR TO THE INSTALLATION OF ANY SANITARY SEWER OR WATER UTILITIES. CONSTRUCTION OF SANITARY SEWER OR WATER UTILITIES SHALL NOT COMMENCE UNTIL AFTER THE PLUMBING PERMIT HAS BEEN OBTAINED, AND ANY AND ALL PERTINENT COMMENTS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED ON THE PLAN AND IN THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. W J G m W UTILITY PLAN 4-1 U O � 01 CV 4-1 co W D � oE�� o w0 rn I I I I N Qz Z D- D > O 0 20 40 80 r -- U O � 01 CV Q co W V) � oE�� o w0 o LULU z Q Qz Z D- D > o� N O O O 00 U �LU J Q � �U W r Oz N Q O o0 N O 2 w }Q7� o C14 C N Q O (D N C O U U NO LO O 0 0 o Wyi CL•Vl �_ .L D = N D C C a w C m I"\ rnO `J O Z 0TU M C7 > Z C7 (D LU CD o w — (� N Z a LL U ' ^ Q N v O Z W w .N N '~ /1 E a) Z) W = > N U L N >Ln CEz ) O �Ef� :3 co T n VJ z ) 0z Q J� z LU O U U z w O IL p --N IL z F, O U V) cn LU 0 ry Z o O o 0 V) LU O N cY) 't cl� z �1 0 J_ m PROJECT NUMBER: 17029 N , SCALE: 1 "=20' C7 OF 8 Q W V) � w0 LULU Q Qz Z m o� Z O 00 �LU 0 � �U W r Oz U o0 PROJECT NUMBER: 17029 N , SCALE: 1 "=20' C7 OF 8 Catch Basin Concrete Curb Storm Sewer Manhole RIM = 955.90 \ RIM = 955.78 — coy C' (� Snnitnry CPwar Monhnlo "I L- tch Basir A = 957.4 lanhole SURFACING NOTES: 1. SUBGRADES SHALL BE SCARIFIED AND/OR COMPACTED AS NECESSARY TO ATTAIN THE REQUIRED COMPACTION DESCRIBED IN THE GENERAL NOTES (SHEET Cl). TEST ROLLING OF THE SUBGRADE SHALL BE OBSERVED BY A QUALIFIED GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER OR TECHNICIAN. LOCATIONS EXHIBITING EXCESSIVE RUTTING (PER MNDOT SPEC. 21 1 1) SHALL BE REPAIRED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO THE PLACEMENT OF AGGREGATE BASE. COMPACTION TESTING IN UTILITY TRENCHES SHALL BE PERFORMED BY AN INDEPENDENT TESTING FIRM. 2. GRAVEL BASE COURSES SHALL BE ROLLED AND COMPACTED. TEST ROLLING OF THE GRAVEL BASE SHALL BE OBSERVED BY A SOILS ENGINEER TO VERIFY STABILITY. 3. ALL EXISTING BITUMINOUS OR CONCRETE EDGES, WHICH WILL ABUT NEW BITUMINOUS OR CONCRETE SURFACING SHALL BE SAWCUT TO OBTAIN A VERTICAL EDGE. 4. EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL BE PLACED AT ALL LOCATIONS WHERE NEW CONCRETE ABUTS EXISTING CONCRETE, AND AT ALL LOCATIONS WHERE SEPARATE CONCRETE POURS ABUT EACH OTHER. 5. SEE SHEET C1 FOR SPECIFICATIONS REGARDING THE CONSTRUCTION OF PAVEMENTS, AND CURB AND GUTTER. PAVING PLAN c n N O 0 20 40 80 r - U O C O E 5n) O cL- N N N U 0 U N Q N Q E E O � O 4 � a N � N i Q O 70 U O O 0 N N O N QQO)C N � "I w � O m` 01 N c� O z N N U J 0 O N O 1010 0 MF1 v (5 00 O or Z" z 6 (o I..L co Z a w CD o ff, 2 w _ M CO N Z Ii U ' ^ Q v O Z W W .N N ~ �0 = Q a 1>, /> z � -r \ 0 N — \` O .0000 C0 ZN 00 .5 CZ rWW z `) 0z Q J� z LU O U F- U z w O IL V) F z O U CIO (�o > LU w ry Z o 0 o 0 V) LU O N (1) v Q:� z V Z In J_ m PROJECT NUMBER: 17029 N , SCALE: 1 ''=20' C8 OF 8 Q W L/) Q w0 LU LU Q Qz Z m o� Z O00 0 � �U LJJ i� O z U o0 -12 PROJECT NUMBER: 17029 N , SCALE: 1 ''=20' C8 OF 8 I Catch BasinConcrete Curb RTM = 955.9[1 � LANDSCAPING SCHEDULE DECIDUOUS TREES QTY. KEY COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME 2 AB AUTUMN BLAZE MAPLE ACER FREMANII 'AUTUMN BLAZE' 1 DN ADEBORAH NORWAY MAPLE �� i�� •y, 71Q[ely�[�L^L�7 7� j 1 I BH I BLACK HILLS SPRUCE ACER PLATANOIDES ORNAMENTAL TREES MALUS 'SPRING SNOW' CONIFEROUS TREES PICEA GLAUCA DENSATA SIZE REMARKS 2.5" B&B STRAIGHT TRUNK NO V -CROTCH 2 5" B&B STRAIGHT TRUNK NO V -CROTCH 2.5" B&BI STRAIGHT TRUNK NO V -CROTCH 6' HT.I FULL FORM TO GRADE tch Basir A = 957.4 lanhole NOTE: THIS PLAN HAS BEEN PREPARED FOR THE PURPOSES OF THE SITE PLAN APPROVAL PROCESS. FOR SPECIFIC LANDSCAPING METHODS, DETAILS, AND SPECIFICATIONS A LANDSCAPE PROFESSIONAL SHOULD BE CONTACTED LANDSCAPE PLAN I I I I 0 20 40 80 SHRUBS 01 N w 9 FG FOERSTER'S FEATHER REED GRASS CALAMAGROSTIS X ACUTIFLORA'KARL FOERSTER' 18" HT., CONT. MIN. 5 CANES AT HT. O z Q 2Oa�O SPEC. 17 BS TOR BIRCHLEAF SPIREA SPIRAEA BETULIFOLIA'TOR' 18" HT., CONT. MIN. 5 CANES AT HT. 1 O U J SPEC. 16 JB CRIMSON PYGMY DWARF JAPANESE BARBERRY BERBERIS THUNBERGII 'CRIMSON PYGMY' 18" HT., CONT. MIN. 5 CANES AT HT. SPEC. 10 CB CHICAGOLAND GREEN BOXWOOD BUXUS X'GLENCOE' 24" HT., CONT. MIN. 5 CANES AT HT. } } — � N O SPEC. 6 MP COMPACT MUGO PINE PINUS MUGO PUMILIO 'COMPACT SELECT' 24" HT., CONT. MIN. 5 CANES AT HT. } Q-0 - C } o 04 SPEC. tch Basir A = 957.4 lanhole NOTE: THIS PLAN HAS BEEN PREPARED FOR THE PURPOSES OF THE SITE PLAN APPROVAL PROCESS. FOR SPECIFIC LANDSCAPING METHODS, DETAILS, AND SPECIFICATIONS A LANDSCAPE PROFESSIONAL SHOULD BE CONTACTED LANDSCAPE PLAN I I I I 0 20 40 80 z O IL U LU LU (/) 0 U 01 N w 0 co J 6 E c O O z Q 2Oa�O Q D N 1 O U J LU O fl� z N cY) `t � } } — � N O w � U } Q-0 - C } o 04 Q U n C U 0 0 O U N O �3:Na�0 L L N Q CL O D — i n W C m I'1 rno O 7 � 00 U Z CY) UJ CD o�� w c\I ( N Z a LL L 0 OC N E O V Z W w .N N E 1 �~ �/ ! E a) �C,6 = > U L (D N N (D > Lo °C oz �CY)� \ \\ O N ) 00 :3 eco T n VJ z O IL U LU LU (/) w Z F- 0 o LU O fl� z N cY) `t V z 0 co Q W V) w0 LULU Z Q Qz O z 00 �LU � W 0 QU r Oz U o0 Q PROJECT ° NUMBER: 17029 NIL c J SCALE: N 1 "=20' O rl- CLI OF 1 Luminaire Schedule Symbol Label QTY Catalog Number 3 CL1-90L-4K-4-BC Description CIMARRON CL1 SITE 1 PHOTOMETRIC PLAN 1 " = 20'-0„ 6- Z ao z z >C� oQ Z:D w N wtr) bA V) Z V)� A j o M o� a ! i n U)H I F4W z S-1 X92) 64 �z ' M F U �D W w w E-��Qzz z �a o w a. z (Z:) >1 N � 11.5w I W USW~�� U) p E- o� I I Ln Z E-- Ua x W W E— � x � � Cfl �w C) z E- x�wza4 I 0 LO co � H o � z 0 o w Q U z o oE� w>E- rz�rxxW� ! i I Z Q J CL o� F - w M O F- O CL w ■ N in N RM >.Z ao m I oQ Z:D F� � W ZZ 0 j 0 z mm o� a U.0 rr ! i Sheet Number Ei ! City Council Agenda: 9/25/17 2K. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2017-66 awarding the sale General Obligation Bonds, Series 2017A, in the original aggregate principal amount of $5,000,000: fixing their form and specifications: directing their execution and deliverv: and providing for their pavment (WO) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: On July 24, 2017, the council authorized the issuance Street Reconstruction and Improvement Bonds. Further, the council authorized the mayor and city administrator to approve the sale of up to$5,000,000 in bonds with a true interest cost not to exceed 3.5% (Resolution 2017-044). Northland marketed the bonds on Thursday morning (September 21) and the mayor and city administrator signed the purchase agreement in the afternoon of the same day. The true interest cost for this negotiated sale 2.40% (10 -year treasury rate 2.27%). The true interest rate for the 2016 sale was 2.06% (10 -year treasury rate 1.74%) The true interest cost for the 2015 negotiated sale was 2.58% (10 -year treasury rate 2.06%). The true interest cost for the December 2014 Judgment -Equipment issue was 3.27% (10 -year treasury rate 2.24%). The treasury rate is provided for comparison purposes. Al. Budget Impact: Debt service payments for the first 10 years are about $470,000 annually and for the next 5 years about $240,000 annually. A2. Staff Workload Impact: Internal coordination of issuance - otherwise little to no impact on the staff. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS Motion to adopt Resolution 2017-66 approving the sale of $5,000,000 G.O. Bonds, Series 2017A. 2. Motion to deny Resolution 2017-66 approving the sale of $5,000,000 G.O. Bonds, Series 2017A. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The City staff supports Alternative #1. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Resolution 2017-66 (not attached — will be provided) B. Northland Securities Schedules: Total Sources and Uses, Debt Service Schedule, Pricing Summary C. Moody's Rating Comments City of Monticello, Minnesota $5,000,000.00 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2017A FINAL Total Issue Sources And Uses Dated 10/24/2017 1 Delivered 10/24/2017 GO Bonds 2017A FINAL I Issue Summary 1 9/21/2017 1 11:23 AM Northland Securities, Inc. Public Finance Page 1 Improvement Abatement Portion Portion Issue Summary Sources Of Funds Par Amount of Bonds $2,040,000.00 $2,960,000.00 $5,000,000.00 Reoffering Premium 32,705.10 46,108.70 78,813.80 Total Sources $2,072,705.10 $3,006,108.70 $5,078,813.80 Uses Of Funds Total Underwriter's Discount (1.400%) 28,560.00 41,440.00 70,000.00 Costs of Issuance 9,506.40 13,793.60 23,300.00 Deposit to Project Construction Fund 2,000,000.00 2,905,000.00 4,905,000.00 Deposit to Project Construction Fund (Premium) 32,705.10 46,108.70 78,813.80 Rounding Amount 1,933.60 (233.60) 1,700.00 Total Uses $2,072,705.10 $3,006,108.70 $5,078,813.80 GO Bonds 2017A FINAL I Issue Summary 1 9/21/2017 1 11:23 AM Northland Securities, Inc. Public Finance Page 1 City of Monticello, Minnesota $5,000,000.00 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2017A FINAL Debt Service Schedule Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I Fiscal Total 10/24/2017 - - 06/15/2018 - - 72,790.67 72,790.67 - 12/15/2018 340,000.00 2.000% 56,720.00 396,720.00 469,510.67 06/15/2019 - - 53,320.00 53,320.00 - 12/15/2019 365,000.00 2.000% 53,320.00 418,320.00 471,640.00 06/15/2020 - - 49,670.00 49,670.00 - 12/15/2020 370,000.00 2.000% 49,670.00 419,670.00 469,340.00 06/15/2021 - - 45,970.00 45,970.00 - 12/15/2021 380,000.00 2.000% 45,970.00 425,970.00 471,940.00 06/15/2022 - - 42,170.00 42,170.00 - 12/15/2022 385,000.00 2.000% 42,170.00 427,170.00 469,340.00 06/15/2023 - - 38,320.00 38,320.00 - 12/15/2023 390,000.00 2.000% 38,320.00 428,320.00 466,640.00 06/15/2024 - - 34,420.00 34,420.00 - 12/15/2024 400,000.00 2.000% 34,420.00 434,420.00 468,840.00 06/15/2025 - - 30,420.00 30,420.00 - 12/15/2025 410,000.00 2.000% 30,420.00 440,420.00 470,840.00 06/15/2026 - - 26,320.00 26,320.00 - 12/15/2026 420,000.00 2.500% 26,320.00 446,320.00 472,640.00 06/15/2027 - - 21,070.00 21,070.00 - 12/15/2027 430,000.00 2.500% 21,070.00 451,070.00 472,140.00 06/15/2028 - - 15,695.00 15,695.00 - 12/15/2028 210,000.00 2.500% 15,695.00 225,695.00 241,390.00 06/15/2029 - - 13,070.00 13,070.00 - 12/15/2029 215,000.00 2.600% 13,070.00 228,070.00 241,140.00 06/15/2030 - - 10,275.00 10,275.00 - 12/15/2030 220,000.00 3.000% 10,275.00 230,275.00 240,550.00 06/15/2031 - - 6,975.00 6,975.00 - 12/15/2031 230,000.00 3.000% 6,975.00 236,975.00 243,950.00 06/15/2032 - - 3,525.00 3,525.00 - 12/15/2032 235,000.00 3.000% 3,525.00 238,525.00 242,050.00 Total $5,000,000.00 - $911,950.67 $5,911,950.67 - Date And Term Structure Dated 10/24/2017 Delivery Date 10/24/2017 First available call date 12/15/2026 Call Price 100.000% Yield Statistics Bond Year Dollars $37,328.33 Average Life 7.466 Years Average Coupon 2.4430522% Net Interest Cost (NIC) 2.4194406% True Interest Cost (TIC) 2.4007017% All Inclusive Cost (AIC) 2.4706120% IRS Form 8038 Net Interest Cost (NIC) 2.4194406% Weighted Average Maturity 7.459 Years Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes 2.1542755% GO Bonds 2017A FINAL I Issue Summary 1 9/21/2017 1 11:20 AM Northland Securities, Inc. Public Finance Page 1 City of Monticello, Minnesota $5,000,000.00 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2017A FINAL Pricing Summary Maturity Type of Bond Coupon Yield Maturity Value Price YTM Call Date Call Price Dollar Price 12/15/2018 Serial Coupon 2.000% 1.000% 340,000.00 101.131% Total Underwriter's Discount (1.400%) 343,845.40 12/15/2019 Serial Coupon 2.000% 1.100% 365,000.00 101.899% Average Life 371,931.35 12/15/2020 Serial Coupon 2.000% 1.200% 370,000.00 102.458% 379,094.60 12/15/2021 Serial Coupon 2.000% 1.350% 380,000.00 102.608% 389,910.40 12/15/2022 Serial Coupon 2.000% 1.500% 385,000.00 102.464% 394,486.40 12/15/2023 Serial Coupon 2.000% 1.700% 390,000.00 101.741% 396,789.90 12/15/2024 Serial Coupon 2.000% 1.850% 400,000.00 100.998% 403,992.00 12/15/2025 Serial Coupon 2.000% 2.050% 410,000.00 99.625% 408,462.50 12/15/2026 Serial Coupon 2.500% 2.200% 420,000.00 102.470% 430,374.00 12/15/2027 Serial Coupon 2.500% 2.400% 430,000.00 100.814% c 2.409% 12/15/2026 100.000% 433,500.20 12/15/2028 Serial Coupon 2.500% 2.500% 210,000.00 100.000% - - - 210,000.00 12/15/2029 Serial Coupon 2.600% 2.600% 215,000.00 100.000% - - - 215,000.00 12/15/2030 Serial Coupon 3.000% 2.600% 220,000.00 103.234% c 2.706% 12/15/2026 100.000% 227,114.80 12/15/2031 Serial Coupon 3.000% 2.700% 230,000.00 102.413% c 2.792% 12/15/2026 100.000% 235,549.90 12/15/2032 Serial Coupon 3.000% 2.800% 235,000.00 101.601% c 2.869% 12/15/2026 100.000% 238,762.35 Total Bid Information $5,000,000.00 - - $5,078,813.80 Par Amount of Bonds $5,000,000.00 Reoffering Premium or (Discount) 78,813.80 Gross Production $5,078,813.80 Total Underwriter's Discount (1.400%) $(70,000.00) Bid (100.176%) 5,008,813.80 Total Purchase Price $5,008,813.80 Bond Year Dollars $37,328.33 Average Life 7.466 Years Average Coupon 2.4430522% Net Interest Cost (NIC) 2.4194406% True Interest Cost (TIC) 2.4007017% GO Bonds 2017A FINAL I Issue Summary 1 9/21/2017 1 11:20 AM Northland Securities, Inc. Public Finance Page 2 CREDIT OPINION Monticello (City of) MN 11 September 2017 New Issue - Moody's Assigns A2 to City of Monticello, MN's New Issue GO Bonds Summary Rating Rationale Moody's Investors Service has assigned an A2 rating to the City of Monticello, MN's $5 million General Obligation Bonds, Series 2017A. Moody's maintains an A2 rating on the city's outstanding general obligation unlimited tax (GOULT) debt. Following the sale, the city will have $27 million of GO debt outstanding. Contacts The A2 GO rating reflects the city's highly concentrated tax base, favorable resident income Benjamin J VanMetre 312-706-9951 indices, healthy reserves, high fixed costs for debt service and a relatively modest pension Analyst burden. The A2 rating also incorporates the city's ongoing support for a city -owned, ben.vanmetre@moodys.com competitive fiber optic utility, which has required subsidies from other city funds. Alexandra S. Parker 212-553-4889 MD -Public Finance Credit Strengths a[exandra.parker@moodys.com » Favorable resident income levels Rachel Cortez 312-706-9956 VP -Sr Credit Officer/ » Healthy reserves across operating funds and essential enterprise funds Manager rachel.cortez@moodys.com » Relatively modest pension burden CLIENT SERVICES Credit Challenges Americas 1-212-553-1653 Asia Pacific 852-3551-3077 » Substantial tax base concentration, with a nuclear power plant comprising 60% of assessed valuation Japan 81-3-5408-4100 EMEA 44-20-7772-5454 » Continued ownership and operating support of a competitive fiber optic utility » Elevated fixed costs for debt service Rating Outlook Outlooks are usually not assigned to local government credits with this amount of debt. Factors that Could Lead to an Upgrade » Significant diversification of the city's tax base » Sustained improvement in the performance of the fiber optic utility that substantially reduces city subsidies Factors that Could Lead to a Downgrade » Challenges with city's largest taxpayer Material reduction of operating reserves Increased support from the city for the fiber optic utility Key Indicators Exhibit 1 Monticello (City of) MN 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 600nomy/Tax Base Total Full Value ($000) $ 867,200 $ 1,336,549 $ 1,348,638 $ 1,648,007 $ 1,775,428 Full Value Per Capita $ 68,224 $ 104,085 $ 103,949 $ 126,139 $ 133,501 Median Family Income(%of USMedian) 125.9% 135.20/o 130.1% 122.5% 122.5% F nances Operat i ng Fbvenue ($000) $ 10,794 $ 13,568 $ 13,781 $ 14,403 $ 12,644 Fund Balance as a% of Fbvenues 149.1% 47.20/o 56.8% 71.20/o 76.6% Cash Bal ance as a % of Fla -venues 150.9% 48.20/o 60.50/o 75.20/o 84.0% Debt/Pensions Net Direct Debt ($000) $ 54,182 $ 22,937 $ 24,061 $ 21,578 $ 20,681 Net Direct Debt / Operating Fevenues(x) 5.Ox 1.7x 1.7x 1.5x 1.6x Net Direct Debt / Full Value (%) 6.2% 1.7% 1.8% 1.3% 1.20/o Moody's- adjusted Net Fbnsion Liability (3 -yr average) to Fevenues (x) 0.9x 0.7x 0.8x 0.7x 0.9x Moody's- adjusted Net Fbnsion Liability (3 -yr average) to Full Value (%) 1.1% 0.7% 0.8% 0.6% 0.6% The above table does not include the most recent sale data. Following the sale, the city will have $22.7 million in net direct debt outstanding, equal to 1.2% of full value and 1.8 times fiscal 2016 operating revenues. Source: Audited Financial Statements, Moody's Investors Service and U.S. Census Bureau Detailed Rating Considerations Economy and Tax Base: Highly concentrated tax base but top taxpayer, Xcel Energy, has long-term operating license The city's moderately sized $1.9 billion tax base is expected to remain stable given recent facility upgrades and investments by the city's largest taxpayer, Xcel Energy Inc. (A3 stable). Xcel completed significant power enhancements and expansions during recent years, driving a 30% increase in the city's 2015 assessed value. The 600 megawatt nuclear station now comprises a substantial 60% of the city's assessed value. The plant employs approximately 3,000 during peak refueling and maintenance periods and 700 during normal operating periods. The plant opened in 1970 and is licensed to operate through 2030. The plant's expected long-term presence, reinforced by its stable operations and the company's decision to undergo recent substantial plant upgrades somewhat mitigates the risks inherent in tax base concentration of this scale. As of July 2017, Wright County's (Aal) unemployment rate (3.3%) was on par with the state's rate (3.4%) and below the national (4.6%) rate. The city's median family income is estimated at 122.5% of the nation median. Financial Operations and Reserves: Healthy operating reserves; continued support of nonessential telecommunications enterprise Monticello's financial profile will likely remain stable despite ongoing support for the city's fiber optic utility. The city closed fiscal 2016 with an available fund balance of $9.7 million, or a strong 77% of revenues across it's major operating funds - including the general fund and debt service fund. The 2016 reserves exceed the city's formal policy of maintaining 45% of operating expenditures. Officials report that year-to-date general fund operations are tracking toward a small surplus for fiscal 2017 and they also expect balanced operations for fiscal 2018. The city may draw down reserves by up to approximately $300,000 during fiscal 2018 for capital projects. We expect the city's reserve position to remain strong despite the planned draw. The largest source of operating revenues is property This publication does not announce a credit rating action. For any credit ratings referenced in this publication, please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com for the most updated credit rating action information and rating history. 2 11 September 2017 Monticello (City of) MN: New Issue - Moody's Assigns A2 to City of Monticello, MN's GO Bonds taxes, which comprised 66% of fiscal 2016 revenues. The city typically increases its property tax levy by 2% to 5% annually and expects to continue this practice going forward. Monticello owns a fiber optic utility that requires ongoing city support. The utility operates and offers cable, telephone, and internet services. Despite reduced expenditures, revenue pressures are ongoing due to continued competition for customer accounts which somewhat limits pricing ability. To date, revenues from the city's municipal liquor fund have been sufficient to support the fiber optic utility. During fiscal 2016, the liquor enterprise generated $600,000 in operating income, net of depreciation, and the city supported the telecommunication enterprise with cash transfers from the municipal liquor fund of $350,000. The city budgeted to transfer $230,000 to the fiber optic utility from the liquor fund in fiscal 2017 but management reports that it may not need to make the transfer as the fiber optic fund still has approximately $270,000 from the 2016 transfer that it has not yet utilized. In 2016, the city entered into an agreement with a private vendor to operate the fiber optics system for five years. Current projections show that the telecommunication enterprise will begin running surplus operations as early as 2019. The city will continue subsidizing deficit operations of the telecommunication enterprise with the liquor fund and, per the agreement, will be required to share any potential future profits with the third party vendor. Additionally, should the fiber optic utility require support beyond what the liquor fund can provide, the city may elect to tap into its general fund reserves or other reserves in order to keep the system viable. Material reductions in operating reserves could lead to downward movement in the city's GO rating. LIQUIDITY The city closed fiscal 2016 with an operating fund net cash position of $10.6 million, or an ample 84% of operating revenues. Debt and Pensions: High fixed costs; low but growing pension burden Following the sale, the city will have $22.7 million in net direct debt outstanding, equal to 1.2% of full value and 1.8 times fiscal 2016 operating revenues. Debt service remains by far the city's largest operating expense, making up 50% of the city's operating expenditures. The city's three year average Moody's Adjusted Net Pension Liability (ANPL) totals $11.5 million, equal to 0.6% of full value and 0.9 times fiscal 2016 operating revenues. While relatively consistent in recent years, pension costs will likely grow because statutory contribution levels have not kept pace with growing unfunded liabilities in state-wide pension plans. The city's 2012 default on the fiber optic utility revenue bonds has limited implications for Monticello's GO credit quality given the city made no legal or other promise to pay debt service from any source other than the pledged revenues. However, the city's decision to issue GO debt to finance the settlement with the revenue bondholders somewhat weakened the overall GO credit profile. In 2008, Monticello issued $26.4 million of fiber optic utility revenue bonds for the construction of a fiber optic system. The project bonds were approved by a referendum that garnered 74% voter support. When the bonds (unrated) were originally sold, the security was expressly limited to net revenues generated from the utility. The city made as scheduled interest only debt service payments from June 2009 through June 2012. Capitalized interest provided debt service through June 2011, and transfers from the municipal liquor fund were the primary source for the December 2011 and June 2012 debt service payments. On June 6, 2012 the city notified the trustee, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (Aal stable) that it would no longer make required monthly sinking fund payments. A technical default occurred on July 1, 2012 because the net revenues of the utility were insufficient to make the sinking fund payment. On December 1, 2012, the first principal payment default occurred. Under the threat of litigation from bondholders, the city and the trustee negotiated a settlement agreement whereby the city paid $5.75 million (estimated 25% recovery) in exchange for release from any future claims from bondholders for debt service payments on the revenue bonds, as well as the ability to continue to own and operate the fiber optic utility. The Settlement Agreement was approved in a Final Approval Order signed by a US District Court judge on September 15, 2014. All bondholders were included as a part of the class action suit against the city. The city financed the settlement with GO bonds contributing slightly to the city's debt burden. DEBT STRUCTURE All of the district's direct debt is fixed rate. Principal amortization is average with 83% of outstanding principal retired in 10 years. DEBT -RELATED DERIVATIVES The city has no derivative agreements. 11 September 2017 Monticello (City of) MN: New Issue - Moody's Assigns A2 to City of Monticello, MN's GO Bonds PENSIONS AND OPEB The city participates in one multiple -employer cost-sharing plan, the General Employees Retirement Fund (GERF). While ultimately dependent on state legislative action, pension contributions will likely rise due to growing unfunded liabilities. Growing pension costs could pressure Minnesota cities' operating budgets. Minnesota statutes establish local government retirement contributions as a share of annual payroll. The employer contribution rate is currently set at 7.5% of payroll for GERF. The city's total fiscal 2016 pension contribution was $270,000, or 2% of operating revenues. Management and Governance: Strong institutional framework Minnesota cities have an Institutional Framework score of Aa, which is high. Institutional Framework scores measure a sector's legal ability to increase revenues and decrease expenditures. The sector has one or more major revenue sources that are not subject to any caps. Revenues tend to be predictable, as cities rely primarily on property taxes and state Local Government Aid (LGA), which is distributed based on demographic and tax base factors. Revenue -raising flexibility is moderate as cities generally benefit from unlimited levying authority, except during years in which the state has imposed limits. Levy limits are not in place for the 2016-2017 biennium. Across the sector, fixed and mandated costs are generally moderate. Minnesota has public sector unions, which can limit the ability to cut expenditures. Expenditures mostly consist of personnel costs, which are highly predictable. Management continues to maintain the city's healthy financial profile. The city's continued commitment to the fiber optic utility creates an elevated contingent liability exposure. However, management expects to improve operations via a recent decision to contracting operations with a private vendor. Legal Security The city's GO bonds, including the Series 2017A bonds, are secured by the city's pledge to levy a dedicated property tax unlimited as to rate and amount. The security benefits from a statutory lien, but there is no lockbox structure. Use of Proceeds The 2017A bonds will finance capital improvements. Obligor Profile Encompassing 8.9 square miles, the city is located in Wright County approximately 45 miles northwest of the Minneapolis -St. Paul (both cities rated Aal stable) metropolitan area and 25 miles south of the City of St. Cloud (Aa2). Methodology The principal methodology used in this rating was US Local Government General Obligation Debt published in December 2016. Please see the Rating Methodologies page on www.moodys.com for a copy of this methodology. Ratings Exhibit 2 Monticello (City of) MN Issue Rating General Obligation Bonds, Series 2017A A2 Rating Type Underlying LT Sale Amount $5,000,000 Expected Sale Date 09/18/2017 Rating Description General Obligation Source: Moody's Investors Service 11 September 2017 Monticello (City of) MN: New Issue - Moody's Assigns A2 to City of Monticello, MN's GO Bonds © 2017 Moody's Corporation, Moody's Investors Service, Inc., Moody's Analytics, Inc. and/or their licensors and affiliates (collectively, "MOODY'S"). All rights reserved. CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE, INC. AND ITS RATINGS AFFILIATES ("MIS") ARE MOODY'S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS MAY INCLUDE MOODY'S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES. MOODY'S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL, FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS MAY ALSO INCLUDE QUANTITATIVE MODEL-BASED ESTIMATES OF CREDIT RISK AND RELATED OPINIONS OR COMMENTARY PUBLISHED BY MOODY'S ANALYTICS, INC. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. NEITHER CREDIT RATINGS NOR MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY'S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS AND PUBLISHES MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL, WITH DUE CARE, MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE. MOODY'S CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY RETAIL INVESTORS AND IT WOULD BE RECKLESS AND INAPPROPRIATE FOR RETAIL INVESTORS TO USE MOODY'S CREDIT RATINGS OR MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS WHEN MAKING AN INVESTMENT DECISION. IF IN DOUBT YOU SHOULD CONTACT YOUR FINANCIAL OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL ADVISER. ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY'S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY'S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided "AS IS" without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY'S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing the Moody's publications. To the extent permitted by law, MOODY'S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability to any person or entity for any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information, even if MOODY'S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers is advised in advance of the possibility of such losses or damages, including but not limited to: (a) any loss of present or prospective profits or (b) any loss or damage arising where the relevant financial instrument is not the subject of a particular credit rating assigned by MOODY'S. To the extent permitted by law, MOODY'S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for any direct or compensatory losses or damages caused to any person or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud, willful misconduct or any other type of liability that, for the avoidance of doubt, by law cannot be excluded) on the part of, or any contingency within or beyond the control of, MOODY'S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information. NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY SUCH RATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY'S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER. Moody's Investors Service, Inc., a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Corporation ("MCO"), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by Moody's Investors Service, Inc. have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to Moody's Investors Service, Inc. for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,500 to approximately $2,500,000. MCO and MIS also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of MIS's ratings and rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold ratings from MIS and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at www.moodvs.com under the heading "Investor Relations—Corporate Governance — Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy." Additional terms for Australia only: Any publication into Australia of this document is pursuant to the Australian Financial Services License of MOODY'S affiliate, Moody's Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657AFSL 336969 and/or Moody's Analytics Australia Pty Ltd ABN 94105136 972 AFSL 383569 (as applicable). This document is intended to be provided only to "wholesale clients" within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY'S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a "wholesale client" and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to "retail clients" within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. MOODY'S credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail investors. It would be reckless and inappropriate for retail investors to use MOODY'S credit ratings or publications when making an investment decision. If in doubt you should contact your financial or other professional adviser. Additional terms for Japan only: Moody's Japan K.K. ("MJKK") is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Group Japan G.K., which is wholly-owned by Moody's Overseas Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO. Moody's SF Japan K.K. ("MSFJ") is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of MJKK. MSFJ is not a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization ("NRSRO"). Therefore, credit ratings assigned by MSFJ are Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings. Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings are assigned by an entity that is not a NRSRO and, consequently, the rated obligation will not qualify for certain types of treatment under U.S. laws. MJKK and MSFJ are credit rating agencies registered with the Japan Financial Services Agency and their registration numbers are FSA Commissioner (Ratings) No. 2 and 3 respectively. MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) hereby disclose that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from JPY200,000 to approximately JPY350,000,000. MJKK and MSFJ also maintain policies and procedures to address Japanese regulatory requirements. REPORT NUMBER 1091058 11 September 2017 Monticello (City of) MN: New Issue - Moody's Assigns A2 to City of Monticello, MN's GO Bonds CLIENT SERVICES Americas 1-212-553-1653 Asia Pacific 852-3551-3077 Japan 81-3-5408-4100 E M EA 44-20-7772-5454 MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE 11 September 2017 Monticello (City of) MN: New Issue - Moody's Assigns A2 to City of Monticello, MN's GO Bonds Council Agenda: 09/21/17 2L. Consideration of approving communitv solar garden subscription agreements with NRG (WO) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The community solar program allows municipal, commercial, and residential consumers to receive the benefits from solar project without installing solar panels on their own property. The power generated from a solar garden is put on the same grid of distribution lines as the power generated by other means. NRG representatives will be at the workshop prior to the council meeting to provide more depth to the discussion and answer questions. If the city decides to participate, there are two basic options: indexed rate or fixed rate. The indexed rate means as rates rise, the city receives the same benefit of one cent per kilowatt hour. It is a low risk -low savings option. The fixed rate option allows the city to benefit from increases in electricity rates. The fixed rate benefit depends on which of the three escalator options the city chooses: 0% (fixed rate = $0.1195), 1 % (fixed rate starts at $0.1110), 2.5% (fixed rate starts at $0.0970). Under the last two, the fixed rate increases annually by the escalator. It takes 8 years for the fixed rates on both the 1% and 2.5% escalators to exceed the flat fixed rate of the 0% escalator. The 0% option means the city will not see an increase in its electricity rate for 25 years. The I% and 2.5% options offer larger earlier savings which are offset by smaller savings later. A net present value (NPV) calculation provides a basis for comparing all the options at by bringing all the future savings back to the present or start of participation. The benefits of the 1 % and 2.5% escalator options are eroded by low growth in the electricity rates. The schedule below includes the PUC -approved electricity rate increases and assumes a 2.9% increase in electricity rates from 2021 through 2042. Net Present Option 25 Year Savings Value (3%) Indexed $ 944,829 $ 663,129 Fixed - 0% $ 4,408,022 $ 2,685,690 Fixed - 1% $ 3,881,264 $ 2,440,713 Fixed - 2.5% $ 3,256,671 $ 2,201,066 The city is allowed to subscribe to a maximum of 40% of a solar garden's production. There are five 1 mega -watt solar gardens co -located at this site, resulting in five contracts. The city is subscribing for approximately 83% (4 million kWh of $4.9 million kWh) of its annual electricity usage. The agreements are for 25 years and each agreement contains termination provisions based the participation period. The contract is in the same format used by the Met Council and it is used throughout the state. The city's legal counsel has reviewed the contract. Council Agenda: 09/21/17 B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve NRG community solar garden agreements with the zero -percent, fixed-rate option. 2. Motion to approve NRG community solar garden agreements with the 3. Motion to deny approval for NRG community solar garden agreements. 4. Other C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative #1. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. NRG Presentation B. Xcel Info Sheet C. Agreement (1 of the 5) D. Rate Scenarios 2 'A _ kYom. r : J . �. NRG Energy, Inc. MN Community Solar September 2017 a Minnesota Presence NRG is the largest owner & operator of Community Solar in the U.S., with a portfolio of projects in Minnesota totaling over .L10 MW. Location I Todd � Mille J -- Grant Morrison Douglas Kanabec Benton Traverse Stevens Pope Stearns — Isanti Big Stone Sherburne C Swift � Anoka Wright wmni Chippewa Kandiyohi Meeker Hennepin Ramsey CS Eligible County La[ qui Parle Operational Project McLeod Carver Yellow Medicine Renville • Monticello Eligible Project Dakota �._ Sibley Lincoln Lyon Redwood Rice Nicollet Le Sueur Goodhue _ Brown Wabasha Pipestone Murray Cottonwood Watonwan Blue Earth Waseca Steele Dodge Olmsted Winona Rock Nobles Jackson I Martin Faribault I Freeborn I Mower Fillmore I Houston Total Project Size (MWdc) Total Project Size (MWac) Total Project Size (kWh) Monticello Subscription (MWdc) [40% of project] Monticello Subscription (MWac) [40% of project] Monticello Subscription (kWh) [40% of project] Construction Start Date Commercial Operation Date St. Cloud 7.5 5.0 10,027,500 3.0 MCI 4,011,000 Q2 2018 Q3 2018 Note: MWdc refers to the form of electricity generated by the panels MWac refers to the form of electricity that flows through the utility distribution grid kWh refers to the measure of energy used per hour NRG Energy, Inc. Confidential I August 2017 nrg 2 Operational Projects P "POP Y Y., %%q qb I %b, .t NRG Energy, Inc. Confidential I August 2017 nrg. Diverse Customer Base C&I Customers Government Entities • U.S. Bank City of Burnsville • City of Byron • Land O' Lakes 0 City of Inver Grove Heights City of Lonsdale • Ecolab coa City of Maple Grove • Red Wing Shoe Co. City of Minneapolis • City of Minnetonka • Macy's 0 City of Montevideo Luther Haven •0 City of Morristown City of Rosemount • Hayfield Window& 0City of Anthony Village • City of Wabasha Door 0 City of West Concord • City of Chisago • City of Dodge • County of Hennepin • County of Wabasha • Wabasha School District • Winona School District • Chippewa County -Montevideo Hospital • Metropolitan Council* Residential NRG has signed up over 5,600 residential customers across the state of Minnesota. Of our projects in Minnesota, 33% of capacity has been subscribed to residential customers —ensuring that these solar gardens benefit every member of the community. %.- http://www.startribune.com/nrg-unveils-its-first-minnesota-community-solar-projects/422604044/ NRG Energy, Inc. Confidential I August 2017 nrg® ' 4 How Community Solar Works 0 Retail customer subscribes to NRG's CSG by signing a 25 -year Solar Subscription Agreement (SSA), which is a fixed rate. The electricity generated goes to Xcel Energy to meet their Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) Retail customers receive a bill credit from 0 Xcel Energy for its share of the electricity produced by the CSG Rate Description Stand. • ARR Small General (<40kW Demand) $0.14798 General (>40kW Demand) Xcel's Applicable _ Retail Rate (ARR) $0.12296 Xcel's total annual revenues M Total Annual Sales (kWh) Utility S S�6s ~off. cya oma. 6r. °' cop s�� S6'o oQ'r s s �o y Community M Solar Subscriber enters into a 25-yrSSA with a Community Solar Garden developer subscriber Garden O Subscriber receives bill credits based on the kWh produced by their subscribed portion of the garden The bill credit amount relates to the ARR in that the Bill Credit = Xcel's ARR + $0.02 REC. The ARR is a formulaic "all -in" retail rate that includes Xcel's charges for energy supply, demand, customer fees, and all applicable riders in a given year. %.- NRG Energy, Inc. Confidential I August 2017 nrg® Program overview »»»»» In 2013, the Minnesota State Legislature passed the Minn. Statute 2166.1641*, which allows residential and commercial customers to benefit from offsite solar through Xcel Energy's Solar Rewards Community Solar Garden (CSG) program. »»»»» Xcel administers the program and applies bill credits to subscribers bills. The bill credit is set annually by the PUC and does not correlate to subscribers electric bill rates. The power generated by the project does not impact subscriber's facility or facility load. »»»»» Subscribers must be within the same or adjacent county to each project and subscriptions are transferrable within the same or adjacent county as the project. »»»»» Each subscriber can take the lesser of: * Minn. Statute 216B.164L Up to 40% of the power generated from the project Up to 120% of each meter's previous year's load NRG Energy, Inc. Confidential I August 2017 nrg., Savings Breakdown NRG's provided pro -forma net savings proposal for your company demonstrates indicative net savings over the next 25 years based on: Customer Load (kWh) 4,903,092 Offtake from CSGs (kWh) 4,011,000 Offtake from CSGs (MWdc) 3.0 Current Customer Rate $0.0991 Customer Annual Bill $485,732 Wtd. Avg. ARR/Bill Credit $0.1238 Rate ($/kWh) Est. Utility Escalation Rate 2.9% NRG's SSA Rate ($/kWh) $0.1195 SSA Escalation Rate 0.0% Est. Year 1 Savings $17,372 Est. Term Savings $4,615,432 % of Load Covered 82% % of Bill Covered by Credits 102% Xcel Bill Offtake from CS 4,011,000 NRG Bill Offtake from CS 4,011,000 Total Savings Xcel Bill Credits - $496,686 - $400,000 Renewable energy production of 4,011,000 kWh in yr 1, can avoid over 8M lbs of CO2 emissions, which is like taking 790 cars off the road for a year, or 621 households not using any electricity for a year. rn $300,000 c �a $200,000 a� z $100,000 Bill Credit $0.1238 SSA Rate $0.1195 Payments to NRG $479,315 Net Savings = Xcel Bill Credits $496,686 = Payments to NRG $479,315 Year 1 savings _ $17,372 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 Years NRG Energy, Inc. Confidential I August 2017 nrg® 7 Xcel Applicable Retail Rate ("ARR") Historical Xcel ARR (1994— 2016) $/kWh $0.1200 $0.1000 .oft ry o $0.0800 � Q$0.0600a� .Q $0.0400 Q $0.0200 $0.0000 1 1985 1995 2005 2015 What are the chances that the ARR could go down in the future instead of up? It is possible but highly unlikely Future ARR Growth Rate Factors • Xcel is an investor-owned utility, and generates earnings growth for its investors by earning a return on capital investments. New capital investments translate into long- term rate increases for ratepayers. • Over the last 12 years, Xcel's ARR has escalated by over 4.4% per year • In May 2017, the MN PUC approved an overall Xcel rate increase – including residential, business, and government customers – of 8.3% over the next 4 years. The deal is retroactive to 2016 and follows five consecutive years of rate hikes for Xcel. • Xcel's ARR will likely increase even further, driven by: — Coal Plant Retirements: o Xcel announces closure of Sherco unit 1 by 2023 & Sherco unit 2 by 2026. The units account for over 20% of Xcel's total generation capacity in MN. o Creates need for new power generation facilities (Nat Gas & Renewables) — Natural Gas Plants o New natural gas plants and wind farms planned after 2020. o Those projects need to be argued in separate proceedings before the PUC, which could result in further rate increases. — Grid Upgrades o New investments in transmission lines and distribution networks — State Renewable Portfolio Standard o Xcel has to source 31.5% of energy from renewables by 2020 and is currently at 16%; significant construction of projects expected Sojrcerttoho-standard-6 <celenerc�y com/statcfdes/xe/Corporate/CRR20] 3/ooerations/g leraton_htmi NRG Energy, Inc. Confidential I August 2017 nrg. 8 What are the risks? #1: Project fails to perform #2: Xcel Energy rates decline instead of going up #3: Your company needs to terminate the Agreement early Project may fail to reach commercial operation. This may occur if the solar project fails to receive a permit or interconnection from Xcel Energy, or the developer fails to secure financing If Xcel Energy's retail rates go down over the next 25 years instead of increasing then the value of the solar credits would also decline and the savings would go down in turn, while your company would still be obligated to pay for the solar energy at the SSA rate. Lost opportunity for savings and wasted time. Under the Solar Subscription Agreement, your company only pays for electricity produced by the project. If the project fails to deliver electricity then your company owes nothing. In the event of an average 2% decrease in rates over the next 25 Select a developer that has a strong track record of performance and a solid balance sheet. NRG is the #1 largest owner of community solar in the country. NRG has 10 different projects in Goodhue, Rice, Dodge, Olmsted and Wabasha counties to offer to your company. Xcel rates have consistently risen at 4.4% over the last 10 years. Xcel years, annual losses could mount to as Energy's 2016 rate case requests high as $128,253 in the final year of significant increases over the next five the Agreement. If your company decides to shut down Could be significant in worst case or leave the area it would need to terminate the Agreement early. Your company can terminate the Agreement at any time with 180 days of notice. NRG would work to find another subscriber during this time. If a subscriber is found, there is no cost to your company to terminate. If another subscriber can not be found then a Termination Fee would need to be paid, which decreases overtime. scenario, however this can be mitigated with good deal structuring years and it explains the fundamental drivers that would point to ongoing rate increases overtime. A decrease is possible though highly unlikely. By ensuring there is strong and specific language in the SSA describing how another subscriber will be found, the risk of needing to pay the termination fee can be significantly reduced. As the SSA is anticipated to generate increasing savings overtime, the SSA should look more and more attractive to another potential subscriber over time. NRG Energy, Inc. Confidential I August 2017 nrg® rg.l ■ Appendix NRG's community solar projects serve as a hedge against rising Xcel rates Diversification and Hedging Overview • Diversification is a risk management technique to lower volatility and potentially yield better outcomes • Diversification serves to smooth out unsystematic risk events in a portfolio so that the positive performance of one factor will neutralize ("hedge") the negative performance of another factor • A hedge is a financial transaction that reduces risk caused by overexposure to one market position by taking on a position with negative correlation • Example: Auto insurance serves as a hedge against possibility of a car crash that would require costly repairs Why Should Hedging Matter to You? • The customer makes electricity payments to Xcel based on its Applicable Retail Rate ("ARR" ), a floating rate set annually that has historically increased -4.5% per year from 2004-2016. Xcel rates are set to rise by -8.3% between 2016-2020. • The customer currently meets 100% of its electricity needs from Xcel and is therefore overexposed to floating rate risk • The customer should diversify from purchasing 100% of its electricity via a floating rate and purchase some portion via a fixed rate • A fixed rate contract will serve as a hedge and protect the customer from anticipated rising electricity rates from Xcel NRG Community Solar = Diversification and Hedging Solution • A subscription with NRG is a hedge for the customer against rising Xcel rates (ARR) in the form of a fixed -for -floating transaction • Instead of purchasing 100% of its electricity from Xcel via a floating rate (ARR), the customer is hedging this risk by purchasing some of its electricity via a fixed rate from an N RG project • Customer purchases Xcel bill credits that positively correlate with Xcel's rates by making fixed SSA payments which does not correlate with Xcel's rates —The customer benefit= Xcel bill credits- Fixed SSA payments to NRG — Fixed SSA payment is sized at a discount to this year's Xcel bill credit • Outcome is lower risk and expected to yield lower operating costs if Xcel rates (ARR) continue to increase as expected NRG Energy, Inc. Confidential I August 2017 nrg. 11 Sensitivity analysis a) E 41 w J 41 U W O a` d O c a) a rn Lm � C W 0 H $35,000,000 - $30,000,000 - $25,000,000 - $20,000,000 - Hedge Anaysis Average long-term escalation rate of 2.9% yields about $4.7M in SSA savings $15,000,000 $10,000,000 - "--4 25 Yr Solar Savings $5,000,000 X25 Yr Do Nothing Spend X25 Yr Spend with SSA $0 Average 10 -year escalation rate of 4.4% yields about $7.8M in SSA savings 0.0% 0.5% 1.0% 1.5% 2.0% 2.5% 3.0% 3.5% 4.0% 4.5% 5.0% 5.5% 6.0% 6.5% 7.0% AVG Annual Utility Escalation Over Project Lifetime NRG Energy, Inc. Confidential I August 2017 nrg® 12 Page 1 of 4 `t"?, XcelEnergy° Solar*Rewards° Community® Minnesota Subscriber FAQs How can 1 subscribe to a community solar garden? In order to be a subscriber to the Minnesota Solar*Rewards Community (S*RC) program, you must be an Xcel Energy electric retail customer in Minnesota. The location of the customer premise associated with the account receiving the bill credit must be in the county where the solar garden is located, or in an adjacent county. You can decide which garden you are interested in and contact one of the many Garden Operators developing solar gardens in Minnesota. Requirements are largely defined in Minn. Statute §216B.1641. Subscriber Requirements The following rules apply to all Solar*Rewards Community subscribers: • A subscriber must be an electric retail customer of Xcel Energy • Subscriptions must not exceed 120% of your average annual electric energy usage • Subscriptions must not exceed 40% of a single garden • Subscribers will be provided a monthly credit on their bill. The credit will be determined on a dollars per kilowatt-hours produced ($/kWh) basis by Xcel Energy. Am 1 eligible to receive a bill credit? What type of credit is available? Xcel Energy customers subscribing to a solar garden are eligible for a solar energy bill credit. Bill credit rates can be found in our Section 9 Tariff. The "Standard Bill Credit" is the applicable retail rate in effect at the time of energy generation. The "Enhanced Bill Credit" is the sum of the applicable Standard Bill Credit and the Commission -approved Renewable Energy Credit (REC) pricing. A Solar*Rewards Community garden electing to sell its RECs (via the Enhanced Bill Credit) to the Company for subscribed energy, shall be at the Commission -approved REC price in place on the date the garden's application is considered by the Company to be complete. How is the credit amount determined? Each month, the solar production from a community solar garden is recorded in kilowatt-hours (kWh). The production amount is then allocated, based on each customer's subscription size. The customer's bill credit is calculated by multiplying the number of kWh by the bill credit rate ($/kWh). Detailed information on the calculation of the bill credit can be found in the published Tariff on our website. Bill credits are applied to the final billed amount, after all electric charges, adjustments, riders, taxes and fees are added in. Therefore the credits will have no impact on the taxable amount owed by the subscriber. When are credits posted? Updated 03/18/2015 Page 2 of 4 On the ninth of every month, each subscriber's share of energy production from the community solar garden is posted to his/her account as a bill credit. Because customers are on different billing cycles, the timing for when each subscriber will see their credit depends on the day their meter is read. If a subscriber's billing cycle (three-day, meter -reading window): • Is before the ninth of the month: the bill will reflect Solar*Rewards Community credits with a one-month lag time/delay. (For example, a September bill will show credits from July.) • Is after the ninth of the month: the bill will reflect Solar*Rewards Community credits for the previous month. (For example, the September bill will show credits from August.) • Contains the ninth of the month: the Solar*Rewards Community bill credit reflected may be from the previous month, or may have a one-month lag. For this small subset of subscribers, bill credits will not be reflected on their bills each and every month; some bills may include two months' worth of bill credits, while some bills may not show any credits. Xcel Energy is not able change customers' billing cycles. However, if a customer is on a meter -reading cycle that results in a bill generating on or near the ninth of the month, we have the ability to delay the creation of that bill, in order to ensure that the customer will only see one credit applied to each bill cycle. If you would like to discuss this option, please send us an email at srcmn@xcelenergv.com. While the credits are reflected differently based on the timing for each customer's bill, please remember that the Solar*Rewards Community bill credits will be posted regularly to customer accounts on the ninth of each month. How does the 120% rule apply to customers? Subscriptions must not exceed 120% of your average annual electric energy usage. If there is less than four months of consumption history, the new home calculator can be used to generate an estimate. Square Feet Range (sq. ft.) 120% Rule Equip aieut (kVvh) Allow PV System Size (kW) 500-1,000 5,311 4.13 1,001 — 1,500 7,.318 5.69 1.501 — 2,000 10.215 7.94 2.001 — 2,500 11.018 8.57 2.541 — 3,000 12.978 10.09 3,001 — 3,500 15,618 12.14 3,501 — 4,000 14,830 11.53 4,001 — 4,500 17,887 13.91 For properties that are over 4,500 square feet, without consumption history, please submit an energy audit (HERS Rating or similar) or load calculations for the property. Please submit all system sizing paperwork to srcmn xcelenerizv.com . We use the National Renewable Energy Laboratory's (NREL) PVWatts° calculator to convert a subscriber's allocation in kW to annual output in kWh. That number is then checked against the customer's historic usage or the home usage estimator for compliance with the 120% rule. NREL's PVWatts calculator can be found on their website. Updated 03/18/2015 Page 3 of 4 How does the 40% allocation requirement work? Minn. Statute §2168.1641 defines a subscriber as "a retail customer of a utility who owns one or more subscriptions of a solar garden facility interconnected with that utility." A retail customer is a separate person or corporation and is the legal name of the party as defined by state law and existing Xcel Energy tariffs. Further, affiliates of a legal entity will be treated as the same person or entity for the purposes of subscription with the exception of government entities. Political subdivisions of a government entity or public agency can be considered separate retail customers of the utility as defined by Minn. Stat. §21613.02, Subd. 2. If a governmental agency composed of sufficient political subdivisions or agencies has a different account, each political subdivision or agency may have a 40% interest in a single garden. To provide some context as to whether or not you may be at risk for allocating more than the legislated 40% threshold, we've provided the below questions to help identify possible cases. If you answer "yes" to one or more of the below questions and intend to subscribe to 40% or more of any solar garden, we suggest you contact the S*RC team at srcmn@xcelenergv.com. We'll contact you within seven calendar days to help resolve your questions. ❑ Do you have more than one physical location to which subscriptions can be attributed? ❑ Do you have more than one account? ❑ Does the premise address on your bill differ from the billing address? ❑ Are you one of many accounts for the same type of business? ❑ Do you have political subdivisions and do you have separate financials per subdivision? For further clarity, we've put together the following questions and answers about this topic: • How do 1 know whether or not I have multiple accounts under one legal entity? There are a couple of ways you can determine whether or not you have multiple accounts that would be combined for the purposes of the 40% requirement. First, if your bill is sent to an alternative address (versus your location) and you receive multiple bills, it is likely that you have several accounts associated with one legal entity. What is meant by "affiliates are considered the same entity"? State statute provides guidance with the definitions of "person" and "corporation", which are as follows: "Person" means a natural person, a partnership, or two or more persons having a joint or common interest, and a corporation as hereinbefore defined. (As noted in Minn. Stat. §21613.02, Subd.3) "Corporation" means a private corporation, a public corporation, a municipality, an association, a cooperative whether incorporated or not, a joint stock association, a business trust, or any political subdivision or agency. (As noted in Minn. Stat. §21613.02, Subd. 2.) Therefore, as defined by statute for our S*RC Community Program, a "person" includes corporations associations or partnerships having a "joint or common interest". Xcel Energy does not have insight into specific customer legal structures, but if your company and another company are affiliated businesses, then together these two businesses can only own up to a 40% interest in one garden. Updated 03/18/2015 Page 4 of 4 • As a government agency, 1 have different political subdivisions. Can 1 have a 40% interest in one garden per political subdivision? The likely answer is yes. Government entities have specific statutes that define them differently than regular "corporations". Some cities have different political subdivisions and have legal entities such as City X Fire Department and City X Libraries. Each subdivision can have a 40% interest. In order to determine if you are a political subdivision or agencv, we provide guidance in the linked document. How can I determine if there is a joint or common" interest between two legal entities? o If you can accurately state "yes" to all of the following, then there is no "joint or common" interest and each legal entity would be its own subscriber. You can confirm: o There is no partnership or joint venture between them? o They have not united together for the same purpose? o There is no common owner between them? o They are not part of the same corporate family — not affiliates, corporate subunits, nor otherwise related companies? o They are independent companies? • Do different legal names and Federal Tax ID number constitute a different subscriber? Not necessarily. Having a different legal name and/or a different Federal Tax ID does not by itself show that these are not the same subscriber. • As an elementary school, our bills are paid by the district. Who is the "retail customer"? Generally speaking, elementary schools and high schools in the same district are considered one legal entity and therefore together could not have more than a 40% interest in one garden. What should 1 do if 1 still have questions? Most customers should have very little difficulty determining their eligibility. But if you are unsure of your legal structure, we recommend you discuss this option with your legal representative and then contact srcmn@xcelenerRv.com to help determine your eligibility for Solar*Rewards Community. Updated 03/18/2015 COMMUNITY SOLAR GARDEN SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENT Solar Garden WHEREAS, NRG MN Community LLC ("Operator") intends to construct, install, own, operate, and maintain a solar photovoltaic System at the Premises described on Schedule 1; WHEREAS, the Parties intend that, pursuant to the Tariff and the Power Purchase Agreement ("PPA"), the System will qualify as a Community Solar Garden and will generate Bill Credits to be applied to Subscriber's monthly invoices from Northern States Power for the retail electric services at the addresses listed in Exhibit C (the "Service Address"); WHEREAS, City of Monticello, a public corporation and political subdivision of the State of Minnesota, by and through City of Monticello, having an address at 505 Walnut Street, Monticello, MN 55362, ("Subscriber") is willing to purchase, or pay to be allocated, Subscriber's Allocated Percentage as described in Exhibit C of the Delivered Energy to be generated by the System commencing on the Commercial Operation Date and continuing through the Term, and Operator is willing to sell, or cause to be allocated, Subscriber's Allocated Percentage of the Delivered Energy to be generated by the System to Subscriber commencing on the Commercial Operation Date and continuing through the Term, as provided under the terms of this Agreement; NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals, mutual promises set forth below, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties hereby agree as follows: 1. DEFINITIONS. 1.1 Definitions. Capitalized terms are defined as follows: "Affiliate" means, with respect to any specified Person, any other Person directly or indirectly controlling, controlled by or under common control with such specified Person. "A2reement" means the Community Solar Garden Subscription Agreement which consists of this agreement and all exhibits. "Annlicable Law" means, with respect to any Person, any constitutional provision, law, statute, rule, regulation, ordinance, treaty, order, decree, judgment, decision, certificate, holding, injunction, registration, permit, authorization, guideline, Governmental Approval, consent or requirement of any Governmental Authority having jurisdiction over such Person or its property, enforceable at law or in equity, including the interpretation and administration thereof by such Governmental Authority. "Bankruntcv Event" means with respect to a Party, that either: (i) such Party has (A) applied for or consented to the appointment of, or the taking of possession by, a receiver, custodian, trustee or 1 liquidator of itself or of all or a substantial part of its property; (B) admitted in writing its inability, or be generally unable, to pay its debts as such debts become due; (C) made a general assignment for the benefit of its creditors; (D) commenced a voluntary case under any bankruptcy law; (E) filed a petition seeking to take advantage of any other law relating to bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, winding up, or composition or readjustment of debts; (F) failed to controvert in a timely and appropriate manner, or acquiesced in writing to, any petition filed against such Party in an involuntary case under any bankruptcy law; or (G) taken any corporate or other action for the purpose of effecting any of the foregoing; or (ii) a proceeding or case has been commenced without the application or consent of such Party in any court of competent jurisdiction seeking (A) its liquidation, reorganization, dissolution or winding -up or the composition or readjustment of debts or, (B) the appointment of a trustee, receiver, custodian, liquidator or the like of such Party under any bankruptcy law, and such proceeding or case has continued undefended, or any order, judgment or decree approving or ordering any of the foregoing shall be entered and continue unstayed and in effect for a period of 60 days. "Bill Credit" means the monetary value of the electricity generated by the Solar System commensurate with Subscriber's Allocated Percentage, as calculated pursuant to the PPA and the Tariff, and credited to Subscriber by Northern States Power Company ("NSP") on its monthly invoice for electric service at the Service Address in accordance with the PPA. The Bill Credit Rate to be used by NSP is the Enhanced Bill Credit as provided in the PPA as the Operator must transfer the Solar Renewable Energy Credits ("RECs") to NSP under the PPA unless directed otherwise by Subscriber. "Billing Cvcle" means the monthly billing cycle established by NSP. "Business Dav" means any day other than Saturday, Sunday, or a legal holiday. "Creditworthv" means a general obligation bond rating of (a) Baa3 or higher by Moody's, (b) BBB- or higher by Fitch IBCA, or (c) BBB- or higher by Standard and Poor's; or, for non-governmental entities not rated by Moody's, Fitch IBCA, or Standard and Poor's, an equivalent credit rating as determined by Operator through review of such entity's (x) most recent three (3) years of audited financial statements with notes, or, if such audited financial statements are not available, (y) most recent three (3) years of unaudited financials (prepared by an external accountant, if available) including income and cash flow statements, a balance sheet, and accompanying notes, if any, for each. "Date of Commercial Operation" means the first day of the first full calendar month upon which commercial operation is achieved following completion of all Interconnection Agreement requirements and processes, as defined by the PPA executed by the Operator and NSP. "Delivered Enerav" means the amount of alternating current (AC) energy generated by the System as inverted to AC and delivered to NSP at the Production Meter (as defined in the PPA). "Early Termination Date" means any date the Agreement terminates other than for expiration of the Term. "Effective Date" means the date on which the Agreement is signed by authorized representatives of both Parties in accordance with Section 2.1. "Environmental Attributes" means, without limitation, carbon trading credits, Renewable Energy Credits or certificates, emissions reduction credits, emissions allowances, green tags, tradable renewable credits, 2 or Green -e® products. "Estimated Remaining Pavments" means as of any date, the estimated remaining Payments to be made through the end of the Term, as reasonably determined and supported by Operator. "Expiration Date" means the date the Agreement terminates by reason of expiration of the Term. "Financing Partv" means, as applicable (i) any Person (or its agent) from whom Operator (or an Affiliate of Operator) leases the System, or (ii) any Person (or its agent) who has made or will make a loan to or otherwise provide financing to Operator (or an Affiliate of Operator) with respect to the System. "Governmental Approval" means any approval, consent, franchise, permit, certificate, resolution, concession, license, or authorization issued by or on behalf of any applicable Governmental Authority. "Governmental Authority" means any federal, state, regional, county, town, city, watershed district, park authority, or municipal government, whether domestic or foreign, or any department, agency, bureau, or other administrative, regulatory or judicial body of any such government. "Guaranteed Output" has the meaning set forth in Section 7.3(b) "Installation Work" means the construction and installation of the System and the start-up, testing and acceptance (but not the operation and maintenance) thereof, all performed by or for Operator at the Premises. "Interconnection Agreement" means the Interconnection Agreement entered into or to be entered into between Operator and NSP as required by the PPA. "NSP" means Northern States Power Company, a Minnesota Corporation and any successor thereto and Xcel Energy Inc., to the extent it has control over NSP's business. "Person" means an individual, partnership, corporation, limited liability company, business trust, joint stock company, trust, unincorporated association, joint venture, firm, or other entity, or a Governmental Authority. "PPA" means the standard Power Purchase Agreement for Solar*Rewards Community to be entered into by and between Operator and NSP whereby NSP agrees to purchase all of the energy produced by the photovoltaic Solar System and to pay for such energy by providing Bill Credits to Subscriber (and other Subscribers). A copy of the PPA will be attached to this Agreement as Exhibit A. "Premises" means the premises described in Exhibit C. "Shortfall Amount" has the meaning set forth in Section 7.4. "Solar Incentives" means any accelerated depreciation, installation or production -based incentives, investment tax credits and subsidies and all other solar or renewable energy subsidies and incentives. "Subscriber's Allocated Percentage" means Subscriber's allocated portion, stated as a percentage, of the Delivered Energy in a given month, as described in Exhibit C. "Stated Rate" means a rate per annum of 1.5% 3 "System" or "Solar Svstem" means the integrated assembly of photovoltaic panels, mounting assemblies, inverters, converters, metering, lighting fixtures, transformers, ballasts, disconnects, combiners, switches, wiring devices and wiring, more specifically described in Exhibit C. "Svstem Operations" means Operator's operation, maintenance and repair of the System performed in accordance with the requirements of this Agreement. "Tariff' means the Solar*Rewards Community Program tariff in NSP's rate book. "Termination Fee" means a fee payable by Subscriber equal to (x) the net present value of the Subscriber's remaining payments to Operator under the Agreement (based on the Estimated Annual Delivered Energy) minus (y) the net present value of remaining payments to Operator for Subscriber's Allocated Percentage of Estimated Annual Delivered Energy at the Unsubscribed Energy Rate using a discount rate of five and one half percent (5.5%); provided that such Termination Fee shall not be less than zero. The Termination Fee for each year of the Term based on Subscriber's Allocated Percentage as of the Effective Date is listed in Exhibit E. "Unsubscribed Ener2v Rate" means $0.034 per kWh, which is the blended rate NSP pays for unsubscribed Delivered Energy under rate code A51 in NSP's rate book in effect on the Effective Date. 2. TERM AND TERMINATION. 2.1 Effective Date. This Agreement is effective upon signature by authorized representatives of both Parties to the Agreement. 2.2 Term. The term of the Agreement begins on the Effective Date and continues for 25 years from the Commercial Operation Date (or such other time period as specified in writing by the Parties), unless terminated earlier under the provisions of this Agreement. Without limiting either Party's termination rights elsewhere in this Agreement, this Agreement will terminate if (i) Subscriber has moved out of or relocated from the county in which the Solar System is located or a contiguous county or relocated from the NSP service territory, and has not, within 90 days after such move or relocation, assigned this Agreement in accordance with the provisions of Section 12.3, or (ii) the PPA is otherwise terminated. 2.3 Termination Before Commercial Operation. If any of the following events or circumstances occurs before the Commercial Operation Date, either Party may terminate the Agreement immediately upon written notice, in which case neither Party will have any liability to the other except for any liabilities that accrued before termination. (a) After timely application to NSP and best efforts to secure interconnection services, Operator has not received evidence that interconnection services will be available for the energy generated by the Solar System. (b) If NSP or another party with the authority to do so, disqualifies the Operator or the facility from participating in the Community Solar Garden Program. (c) Before the PPA is signed, if the legislature, PUC, NSP, or any other entity reduces the 4 credit base rate, or basis of escalation of that rate from that anticipated at the time of acceptance of the proposal by the Subscriber. (d) If the State legislature dissolves the Subscriber; provided that Subscriber's obligations under this Agreement are reassigned. 2.4 Termination for Unnecessary Delav in Achieving Commercial Operation. Operator agrees to achieve commercial operation within a commercially reasonable timeframe. If Operator does not achieve Commercial Operation within 2 years of the Effective Date, at Subscriber's sole discretion, Subscriber may terminate this Agreement with 60 days' written notice. If Subscriber terminates the Agreement under this provision, Subscriber will have no liability to the Operator except for any liabilities that accrued before the termination. 2.5 [Reserved.] 2.6 Termination Upon Mutual Aereement. This Agreement may be terminated at any time, for any reason, by mutual agreement of the Parties in writing. 2.7 Operator Conditions of the Agreement Prior to Installation. In the event that any of the following events or circumstances occur prior to the Commercial Operation Date, Operator may (in its sole discretion) terminate this Agreement, in which case neither Party shall have any liability to the other except for any such liabilities that may have accrued prior to such termination. (a) There has been a material adverse change, not reasonably knowable by the Operator prior to execution of the Agreement, in the (i) rights of Operator to construct the System on the Premises, or (ii) financial prospects or viability of the Solar System, whether due to market conditions, cost of equipment or any other reason. (b) After timely application to NSP and best efforts to secure interconnection services, Operator has not received evidence reasonably satisfactory to it that interconnection services will be available with respect to energy generated by the System. (c) Operator has determined that Subscriber is not Creditworthy. (d) Operator is unable to obtain financing for the System on terms and conditions reasonably satisfactory to Operator. (e) Subscriber's representation and warranty contained in Section 8.2(d) is no longer true and correct. 3. CONSTRUCTION, INSTALLATION AND TESTING OF SYSTEM. 3.1 Svstem Acceptance Testing. (a) Operator must test the System in accordance with such methods, acts, guidelines, 5 standards and criteria reasonably accepted or followed by photovoltaic solar system integrators in the United States and as otherwise required by the PPA and the NSP Tariff. (b) Commercial Operation occurs when the "Date of Commercial Operation" occurs under the PPA. At least a week before the Date of Commercial Operation, Operator will send a written notice to Subscriber providing the Date of Commercial Operation and the provided date will be the Commercial Operation Date for the purposes of this Agreement. Operator has the sole responsibility to notify NSP of this date and get any necessary approvals from NSP. 4. SYSTEM OPERATIONS. 4.1 Operator as Owner and Operator. The System will be owned by Operator, Operator's designee or Operator's Financing Party and will be operated and maintained in accordance with the PPA and the NSP Tariff and, as necessary, maintained and repaired by Operator at its sole cost and expense. Installation of the System, upgrades and repairs will be under the direct supervision of an NABCEP- certified solar professional. Maintenance will be performed according to industry standards, including the recommendations of the manufacturers of solar panels and other operational components. 4.2 Metering. There will be two meters installed and maintained by NSP, which will measure the amount of electrical energy flowing to and from the Premises as further described in the PPA. The Production Meter (as defined in the PPA) will record the amount of Delivered Energy. Operator will make the raw meter data available to Subscriber upon Subscriber's request. 5. DELIVERY OF ENERGY. 5.1 Purchase Requirement. Subscriber agrees to make payments calculated as Subscriber's Allocated Percentage multiplied by (x) Delivered Energy generated by the System beginning on the Commercial Operation Date and continuing for each applicable month of the Term and (y) the kWh Rate. If there is a difference between the metered energy credited by NSP to the Subscriber on the subscribed account's bills and the Delivered Energy, the Subscriber's payments will be based on energy credited. 5.2 Estimated Annual Delivered Eneray. The total annual estimate of Delivered Energy for any given year is the "Estimated Annual Delivered Energy." The Estimated Annual Delivered Energy and the estimated amount of electricity to be allocated to Subscriber for each year of the Term starting on the Commercial Operation Date are identified in Exhibit D. The estimated amount of electricity allocated to Subscriber is Subscriber's Allocated Percentage of the Estimated Annual Delivered Energy. 5.3 Environmental Attributes and Solar Incentives. (a) Subscriber's purchase does not include Environmental Attributes or Solar Incentives; (b) Subscriber disclaims any right to Solar Incentives or Environmental Attributes based upon the installation of the System, and to avoid any conflicts with fair trade rules regarding claims of solar or 2 renewable energy use and to help ensure that Environmental Attributes will be certified by Green -e® or a similar organization Subscriber will, at the request of Operator, execute documents or agreements reasonably necessary to fulfill the intent of this Section; and (c) Without limiting the foregoing, Subscriber agrees that NSP will acquire from Operator under the PPA all energy generated by the Solar System and may, as provided for in the PPA, acquire all Renewable Energy Credits (as defined in the PPA) associated with the Solar System. If the Renewable Energy Credits (as defined in the PPA) associated with the Solar System are acquired by NSP, Operator will notify the Subscriber of the acquisition. Operator and Subscriber agree not to make any statement contrary to NSP's ownership. 5.4 Title to Svstem. Throughout the Term, Operator, Operator's designee or Operator's Financing Party is the legal and beneficial owner of the System at all times, and the System will remain the personal property of Operator, Operator's designee or Operator's Financing Party. 5.5 Obligations of Parties. The Parties will work cooperatively and in good faith to meet all Community Solar Garden program requirements under Applicable Law, the PPA and the Tariff, including applicable interconnection and metering requirements. The Parties agree that beginning on the Commercial Operation Date (a) Operator will transmit all of the Delivered Energy into the NSP system for the benefit of Subscriber, and (b) Subscriber shall be entitled to all Bill Credits issued by NSP resulting from such transmission and corresponding with Subscriber's Allocated Percentage. 6. PRICE AND PAYMENT. 6.1 Consideration. Subscriber shall pay to Operator a monthly payment ("Payment") for Subscriber's Allocated Percentage of Delivered Energy beginning on the Commercial Operation Date and continuing through the Term. Subscriber will pay a price of $0.1195 per Kilowatt Hour ("kWh Rate"), with a 0% annual escalation for the term of this Agreement. 6.2 Invoices. Operator shall invoice Subscriber within 30 days of the last Business Day of each calendar month (each such date on which an invoice is issued by Operator to Subscriber, an "Invoice Date") for the Payment in respect of Subscriber's Allocated Percentage of Delivered Energy during the immediately preceding calendar month. Subscriber's first invoice under this Agreement shall be for the first full calendar month after the Commercial Operation Date. Subscriber shall (i) neither receive nor be entitled to any Bill Credits associated with Delivered Energy prior to the Commercial Operation Date, and (ii) have no obligation to make or any liability for Payments for Delivered Energy prior to the Commercial Operation Date. If the first month of commercial operation is less than a full calendar month, the Operator will bill Subscriber for any Delivered Energy on the invoice for the first full calendar month of operation. 6.3 Time of Pavment. Subscriber will pay all undisputed amounts due hereunder within 35 days of the Invoice Date. 6.4 Method of Pavment. Subscriber will make all payments under the Agreement by electronic funds transfer in immediately available funds to the account designated by Operator from 7 time to time. If Subscriber does not have electronic funds transfer capability, or does not desire to use electronic funds transfer, the Parties shall agree to an alternative method of payment. All payments that are not paid when due shall bear interest accruing from the date becoming past due until paid in full at a rate equal to the Stated Rate. Except for billing errors or as provided in Section 6.5 below, all payments made hereunder shall be non-refundable, be made free and clear of any tax, levy, assessment, duties or other charges and not subject to reduction, withholding, set-off, or adjustment of any kind. 6.5 Disputed Pavments. If a bona fide dispute arises with respect to any invoice, Subscriber shall not be deemed in default under the Agreement and the Parties shall not suspend the performance of their respective obligations hereunder, including payment of undisputed amounts owed hereunder. If an amount disputed by Subscriber is subsequently deemed to have been due pursuant to the applicable invoice, interest shall accrue at the Stated Rate on such amount from the date becoming past due under such invoice until the date paid. 6.6 Billing Adiustments Following NSP Billing Adiustments. If, as a result of an NSP billing adjustment, the quantity of Delivered Energy is decreased (the "Electricity Deficiency Quantity") and NSP reduces the amount of Bill Credits allocated to Subscriber for such period, Operator will reimburse Subscriber for the amount paid by Subscriber in consideration for the Electricity Deficiency Quantity. If as a result of such adjustment the quantity of Delivered Energy allocated to Subscriber is increased (the `Electricity Surplus Quantity") and NSP increases the amount of Bill Credits allocated to Subscriber for such period, Subscriber will pay for the Electricity Surplus Quantity at the kWh Rate applicable during such period. 7. GENERAL COVENANTS. 7.1 Operator's Covenants. Operator covenants and agrees to the following: (a) Notice of Damage or Emer2encv. Operator will within 3 business days notify Subscriber if it becomes aware of any significant damage to or loss of the use of the System or that could reasonably be expected to adversely affect the System. (b) Svstem Condition. Operator shall make commercially reasonable efforts to ensure that the System is capable of operating at a commercially reasonable continuous rate. (c) Governmental Approvals. While providing the Installation Work and System Operations, Operator shall obtain and maintain and secure all Governmental Approvals required to be obtained and maintained and secured by Operator and to enable Operator to perform such obligations. (d) Interconnection Fees. Operator is responsible for all costs, fees, charges and obligations required to connect the System to the NSP distribution system, including fees associated with system upgrades, production, and operation and maintenance carrying charges, as provided in the Interconnection Agreement ("Interconnection Obligations"). In no event shall Subscriber be responsible for any Interconnection Obligations. 0 (e) Compliance with PPA. Tariff and Interconnection Agreement. Operator shall cause the System to be designed, installed and operated in compliance with the PPA, the Tariff and the Interconnection Agreement. (f) The PPA requires that Operator (as opposed to NSP) is responsible for answering all questions from Subscriber regarding its participation in the Solar System. Operator is solely responsible for resolving disputes with NSP or Subscriber regarding the accuracy of Subscriber's Allocated Percentage and the Delivered Energy allocated to Subscriber in connection therewith. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Subscriber acknowledges that NSP is responsible for resolving disputes with Subscriber regarding the applicable rate used to determine the Bill Credit. (g) The Operator is duly organized and validly existing and in good standing in the jurisdiction of its organization, and authorized to do business in the State of Minnesota. 7.2 Subscriber's Covenants. Subscriber covenants and agrees as follows: (a) Consents and Approvals. Subscriber will ensure that any authorizations required of Subscriber under this Agreement are provided in a timely manner. To the extent that only Subscriber is authorized to request, obtain or issue any necessary approvals, rebates or other financial incentives, Subscriber will cooperate with Operator to obtain such approvals, rebates or other financial incentives. (b) Subscriber Aaencv and Consent Form. On or about the Effective Date, Subscriber will execute and deliver to Operator a Subscriber Agency Agreement and Consent Form in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A. Subscriber acknowledges that such agreement is required of Subscriber pursuant to the PPA. 7.3 Minimum Production: Lost Production Pavments. (a) Estimated Annual Delivered Energy is calculated by multiplying estimated output from the System (using PVSYST software) by the availability factor estimated by Operator while allowing for a 0.7% annual degradation of the System. The Subscriber's Estimated Annual Delivered Energy is the Subscriber's Allocated Percentage multiplied by the Estimated Annual Delivered Energy delivered by the System. (b) Operator hereby guarantees that the Subscriber's Allocated Percentage of Delivered Energy will be at least eighty five percent (85%) of the Subscriber's Estimated Annual Delivered Energy (the "Guaranteed Output"); provided that the Estimated Annual Delivered Energy shall be adjusted for (i) Force Majeure Events, (ii) weather and (iii) decreases in Delivered Energy resulting from an emergency situation that threatens injury to persons or property that was not a result of the acts or omissions of Operator. 7.4 Delivery Shortfalls. If, at the end of a Contract Year, the Subscriber's Allocated 0 Percentage of Delivered Energy for such Contract Year is less than the Guaranteed Output (the "Shortfall Amount"), then Operator shall pay Subscriber an amount equal to the excess, if any, of (1) the difference between the Bill Credits that Subscriber would have received and the Payments that would have been due had the Shortfall Amount been delivered over (2) the difference between the Bill Credits that Subscriber actually received and the Payments that were actually received, in each case with respect to such Contract Year. Operator shall make such payment within forty five (45) days of the end of each Contract Year. 8. REPRESENTATIONS & WARRANTIES. 8.1 Representations and Warranties Relating to Aareement Validitv. In addition to any other representations and warranties contained in the Agreement, each Party represents and warrants to the other as of the date of this Agreement and on the Effective Date that: (a) it is duly organized, validly existing and in good standing in the jurisdiction of its organization and it has the full right and authority to enter into, execute, deliver, and perform its obligations under the Agreement; (b) it has taken all requisite corporate or other action to approve the execution, delivery, and performance of the Agreement; (c) the Agreement constitutes its legal, valid and binding obligation enforceable against such Party in accordance with its terms, except as may be limited by applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium, and other similar laws now or hereafter in effect relating to creditors' rights generally; (d) there is no litigation, action, proceeding or investigation pending or, to the best of its knowledge, threatened before any court or other Governmental Authority by, against, affecting or involving any of its business or assets that could reasonably be expected to adversely affect its ability to carry out the transactions contemplated herein; and (e) its execution and performance of the Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby do not constitute a breach of any term or provision of, or a default under, (i) any contract or agreement to which it or any of its Affiliates is a party or by which it or any of its Affiliates or its or their property is bound, (ii) its organizational documents, or (iii) any Applicable Laws. 8.2 Specific Representations and Warranties of Subscriber. Subscriber represents and warrants to Operator as of the date of this Agreement and on the Effective Date that: (a) Subscriber is the sole party in interest agreeing to purchase Subscriber's Allocated Percentage and is acquiring Subscriber's Allocated Percentage for its own account, and not with a view to the resale or other distribution thereof, in whole or in part, and agrees that it will not transfer, sell or otherwise dispose of Subscriber's Allocated Percentage in any manner that will violate applicable securities law; (b) Subscriber is not relying on (i) Operator, or (ii) other subscribers, or any of the 10 employees, members of boards of directors (or equivalent body) or officers, of those parties, or this Agreement with respect to tax and other economic considerations involved in the Agreement (c) Subscriber's Allocated Percentage, combined with any other distributed resources serving the Service Address, represents no more than 120 percent of Subscriber's average annual consumption at the Service Address over the last twenty-four (24) months; and (d) Subscriber is a retail electric service customer of NSP and the Service Address is within the same county or contiguous county as the Solar System. (e) Subscriber is not exempt from the Solar Energy Standard under Minnesota Statutes Section 216B.1691, subd. 2f(d). 8.3 Exclusion of Warranties. EXCEPT AS EXPRESSLY PROVIDED IN SECTIONS 3.1, 4.1, 7.1, THIS SECTION 8, THE INSTALLATION WORK, SYSTEM OPERATIONS AND PERFORMANCE PROVIDED BY OPERATOR TO SUBSCRIBER UNDER THIS AGREEMENT SHALL BE "AS -IS WHERE -IS." NO OTHER WARRANTY TO SUBSCRIBER OR ANY OTHER PERSON, WHETHER EXPRESS, IMPLIED OR STATUTORY, IS MADE AS TO THE INSTALLATION, DESIGN, DESCRIPTION, QUALITY, MERCHANTABILITY, COMPLETENESS, USEFUL LIFE, FUTURE ECONOMIC VIABILITY, OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF THE SYSTEM OR ANY OTHER SERVICE PROVIDED HEREUNDER OR DESCRIBED HEREIN, OR AS TO ANY OTHER MATTER, ALL OF WHICH ARE EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMED BY OPERATOR. 9. TAXES AND GOVERNMENTAL FEES. Operator is responsible for all income, gross receipts, ad valorem, personal property or real property or other similar taxes and any and all franchise fees or similar fees assessed against it due to its ownership of the System. Operator is not obligated for any taxes payable by or assessed against Subscriber based on or related to Subscriber's overall income or revenues. 10. FORCE MAJEURE. 10.1 Definition. "Force Maieure Event" means any act or event that prevents the affected Party from performing its obligations in accordance with the Agreement, if such act or event is beyond the reasonable control, and not the result of the fault or negligence, of the affected Party and such Party had been unable to overcome such act or event with the exercise of due diligence (including the expenditure of reasonable sums). Subject to the foregoing conditions, "Force Majeure Event" shall include the following acts or events: (i) natural phenomena, such as storms, hurricanes, floods, lightning, volcanic eruptions and earthquakes; (ii) explosions or fires arising from lightning or other causes unrelated to the acts or omissions of the Party seeking to be excused from performance; (iii) acts of war or public disorders, civil disturbances, riots, insurrection, sabotage, epidemic, terrorist acts, or rebellion; (iv) strikes or labor disputes (except strikes or labor disputes caused solely by employees of Operator as a result of such Party's failure to comply with a collective bargaining agreement); (v) action or inaction by a Governmental Authority (unless Subscriber is a Governmental Authority and Subscriber is the Party whose performance is affected by such action nor inaction); and (vi) any event of force majeure under the PPA. A Force Majeure Event shall not be based on the economic hardship 11 of either Party. 10.2 Excused Performance. Except as otherwise specifically provided in the Agreement, neither Party shall be considered in breach of the Agreement or liable for any delay or failure to comply with the Agreement (other than the failure to pay amounts due hereunder), if and to the extent that such delay or failure is attributable to the occurrence of a Force Majeure Event; provided that the Party claiming relief under this Article 10 shall immediately (i) notify the other Party in writing of the existence of the Force Majeure Event, (ii) exercise all reasonable efforts necessary to minimize delay caused by such Force Majeure Event, (iii) notify the other Party in writing of the cessation or termination of said Force Majeure Event and (iv) resume performance of its obligations hereunder as soon as practicable thereafter; provided, however, that Subscriber shall not be excused from making any payments and paying any unpaid amounts due in respect of Subscriber's Allocated Percentage of Delivered Energy prior to any performance interruption due to a Force Majeure Event. 10.3 Termination for Force Maieure. Either Party may terminate this Agreement upon 15 days written notice to the other Party if any Force Majeure Event affecting such other Party has been in existence for a period of 180 consecutive days or longer, unless such Force Majeure Event expired before the end of the 15 day notice period. 11. DEFAULT. 11.1 Onerator Defaults and Subscriber Remedies. (a) Operator Defaults. The following events are defaults with respect to Operator (each, an "Operator Default"): (i) A Bankruptcy Event occurs with respect to Operator; (ii) Operator fails to pay Subscriber any undisputed amount owed under the Agreement within 30 days from receipt of notice from Subscriber of such past due amount; (iii) Operator breaches any material term of the Agreement and (A) such breach can be cured within 30 days after Subscriber's written notice of such breach and Operator fails to so cure, or (B) Operator fails to commence and pursue a cure within such 30 day period if a longer cure period is needed; and (iv) The PPA is terminated for any reason. (b) Subscriber's Remedies. If an Operator Default described in Section 11.1(a) has occurred and results in the failure or inability of the Solar System to produce Delivered Energy over a period of 180 consecutive days, in addition to other remedies expressly provided herein, and subject to Article 15, Subscriber may terminate the Agreement and exercise any other remedy it may have at law or equity or under the Agreement. In the event of such termination, Subscriber shall use reasonable efforts to mitigate its damages. 11.2 Subscriber Defaults and Operator's Remedies. 12 (a) Subscriber Default. The following events shall be defaults with respect to Subscriber (each, a "Subscriber Default"): (i) A Bankruptcy Event occurs with respect to Subscriber; (ii) Subscriber fails to pay Operator any undisputed amount due Operator under the Agreement within 30 days from receipt of notice from Operator of such past due amount; and (iii) Subscriber breaches any material term of the Agreement and (A) if such breach can be cured within 30 days after Operator's notice of such breach and Subscriber fails to so cure, or (B) Subscriber fails to commence and pursue said cure within such 30 day period if a longer cure period is needed. (iv) This Agreement is terminated pursuant to Section 2.2(i). (b) Operator's Remedies. If a Subscriber Default described in Section 11.2(a) has occurred and is continuing, in addition to other remedies expressly provided herein, Operator may (i) terminate this Agreement and collect the Termination Fee; provided that if within three years after collecting the Termination Fee, Operator sells all of Subscriber's Allocated Percentage (after making commercially reasonable efforts to do so and after filling any pre-existing unsubscribed portion of the Delivered Energy), then Subscriber will be entitled to recover from Operator an amount equal to the net present value, using a discount rate of 5.5%, ascribed by Operator to such new subscriber's subscription minus the costs Operator incurred to sell Subscriber's Allocated Percentage (including marketing costs associated with finding a new subscriber), (ii) sell Subscriber's Allocated Percentage to one or more persons other than Subscriber, and (iii) exercise any other remedy it may have at law or equity or under the Agreement. In the event of any such termination, Operator shall use reasonable efforts to mitigate its damages. 12. ASSIGNMENT. 12.1 Assignment by Operator. Operator shall not sell, transfer or assign (collectively, an "Assignment") the Agreement or any interest therein, without the prior written consent of Subscriber, which shall not be unreasonably withheld. Operator shall provide Subscriber with such information concerning the proposed transferee (including any person or entity liable for the performance of the terms and conditions of this Agreement) as may be reasonably requested by Subscriber. Operator's request for Subscriber's consent to any assignment must be in writing and provided to Subscriber at least 10 business days before the proposed effective date of the assignment. Operator shall include with such request contact information for the assignee. Notwithstanding the forgoing, Operator may, without the consent of Subscriber, (1) transfer, pledge or assign all or substantially all of its rights and obligations hereunder to a Financing Party as security for any financing and/or sale-leaseback transaction or to an affiliated special purpose entity created for the financing or tax credit purposes related to System, (2) after the Commercial 13 Operation Date, transfer or assign this Agreement to any person or entity succeeding to all or substantially all of the assets of Operator, (3) assign this Agreement to one or more affiliates, provided that prior to the assignment Operator provides a copy of the fully executed interconnection agreement between Xcel and the affiliate; or (4) assign its rights under this Agreement to a successor entity in a merger or acquisition transaction; provided, however, that any assignee under clauses (2)-(4) shall agree to be bound by the terms and conditions hereof. Subscriber agrees to provide acknowledgments, consents or certifications reasonably requested by any Financing Party in conjunction with any financing of the System. In the event that Operator identifies such secured Financing Party, then Subscriber shall comply with the provisions set forth in Exhibit B to this Agreement. Any Financing Party shall be an intended third -party beneficiary of this Section 12.1. Operator agrees to provide notice of any assignment permitted by this section and documentation, as applicable, to the Subscriber as soon as reasonably practicable, and in no event before Operator requests payment or has other claims or requests of Subscriber pursuant to this Section 12.1. 12.2. Acknowledgment of Collateral Assignment. If Operator identifies a secured Financing Party and Subscriber consents to the collateral assignment under Section 12.1, then Subscriber acknowledges and agrees: (a) to the collateral assignment by Operator to the Financing Party, of Operator's right, title and interest in, to and under the Agreement, as consented to under Section 12.1 of the Agreement. (b) that the Financing Party as such collateral assignee is entitled to exercise any and all rights of lenders generally with respect to Operator's interests in this Agreement. Any Financing Party is an intended third -party beneficiary of this Section 12.2. 12.3 Assignment by Subscriber. (a) Subscriber will not assign this Agreement or any interest herein, without the prior written consent of Operator; provided however that Operator shall not unreasonably withhold condition or delay its consent for Subscriber to change the Service Address for which the Bill Credits will apply to another Service Address. (c) Subscriber's request for Operator's consent to any proposed change or assignment as contemplated in Section 12.3(a) must be in writing and provided to Operator at least 30 days before the proposed effective date of such change or assignment, which request must include: (i) Subscriber's name and mailing address; (ii) the current Service Address; (iii) the new Service Address (if applicable); (iv) the name of the individual or entity to whom Subscriber is requesting to assign this Agreement (if applicable) and the consideration (if any) proposed to be provided to Subscriber for such assignment; and (v) the proposed effective date of such proposed change or assignment. In the case of any assignment of this Agreement in whole or in part to another individual or entity, (i) such assignee's Service Address shall be located within NSP's service territory and within the same county as the Solar System or a contiguous county, (ii) such assignee shall be Creditworthy and shall execute a new Minnesota Community Solar Program Subscription Agreement substantially in the same form as this Agreement, specifically including the representations and warranties in Section 8.2; and (iii) the value 14 of any consideration to be provided to Subscriber for assignment of this Agreement may not exceed the aggregate amount of Bill Credits that have accrued to Subscriber, but have not yet been applied to Subscriber's monthly invoice(s) from NSP. (c) Upon any assignment of this Agreement pursuant to this Section 12.3, Subscriber will surrender all right, title and interest in and to this Agreement. Any purported assignment in contravention of this Section 12.3 shall be of no force and effect and null and void ab initio. No assignment will extend the Term of this Agreement. If Subscriber terminates its retail electric service with NSP or moves outside of NSP territory without first transferring Subscriber's Allocated Percentage to an eligible transferee, Subscriber will forfeit its right to receive Bill Credits, but will continue to be responsible for the Payments under this Agreement until Subscriber's Allocated Percentage is transferred or this Agreement terminates pursuant to its terms. 13. NOTICES. 13.1 Notice Addresses. Unless otherwise provided in the Agreement, all notices and communications concerning the Agreement shall be in writing and addressed to the other Party (or Financing Party, as the case may be) at the addresses below, or at such other address as may be designated in writing to the other Party from time to time. Subseriber: City of Monticello 505 Walnut St Monticello, MN 55362 Fin ncing Party [Toe provided by Operator when known] Onerator: NRG MN Community LLC c/o NRG Renew LLC 5790 Fleet Street, Suite 200 Carlsbad, CA 92008 Attention: General Counsel 13.2 Notice. Unless otherwise provided herein, any notice provided for in the Agreement shall be hand delivered, sent by registered or certified U.S. Mail, postage prepaid, or by commercial overnight delivery service, or transmitted by email and shall be deemed delivered to the addressee or its office when received at the address for notice specified above when hand delivered, upon confirmation of sending when sent by email (if sent during normal business hours or the next Business Day if sent at any other time), on the Business Day after being sent when sent by overnight delivery service, or 5 Business Days after deposit in the mail when sent by U.S. mail. 13.3 Address for Invoices. All invoices under the Agreement shall be sent to the address provided by Subscriber. Invoices shall be sent by regular first class mail postage prepaid. 14. DATA PRACTICES. 14.1 Data Practices. (a) Consistent with Minnesota Statutes, section 13.05, subdivision 6, if any data on individuals is made available to the Operator by the Subscriber under this Agreement, the Operator will administer and maintain any such data in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13 (the 15 "Minnesota Government Data Practices Act"), and any other statutory provisions applicable to the data. If and to the extent that Minnesota Statutes, section 13.05, subdivision 11, is applicable to this Contract, then: i) all of the data created, collected, received, stored, used, maintained, or disseminated by the Operator in performing this Agreement are subject to the requirements of the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act; ii) the Operator must comply with those requirements as if it were a government entity; and iii) the remedies in Minnesota Statutes, section 13.08 apply to the Operator. (b) Consistent with Minnesota Statutes, section 13.055, if "private data on individuals," "confidential data on individuals" or other "not public data" are provided to or made accessible to the Operator by the Subscriber, the Operator must: i) have safeguards to ensure private or confidential data on individuals or other not public data are only accessible or viewable by Operator employees and agents whose work assignments in connection with the performance of this Agreement reasonably require them to have access to the data; ii) immediately notify the Subscriber of any unauthorized access by Operator employees and agents, and unauthorized access by third parties; iii) fully cooperate with Subscriber investigations into any breach in the security of private or confidential data on individuals or other not public data that may have occurred in connection with the Operator's access to or use of the data; and iv) fully cooperate with the Subscriber in fulfilling the notice and reporting requirements of Minnesota Statutes, section 13.055. The penalties in Minnesota Statutes, section 13.09 governing unauthorized acquisition of not public data apply to the Operator and Operator employees and agents. If the Operator is permitted to use a subcontractor to perform Operator's work under this Agreement, the Operator shall incorporate these data practices provisions into the subcontract. If the Operator receives a request to release data referred to in this section, the Operator must immediately notify the Subscriber. The Subscriber will give the Operator instructions concerning the release of the data to the requesting party before the data is released. 14.2 Data Sharing. Operator may share data with NSP in accordance with the terms set forth in the attached Subscriber Agency Agreement and Consent Form. 15. INSURANCE 15.1 Insurance. With respect to the services provided pursuant to this Agreement, Operator shall at all times during the term of this Agreement and beyond such term when so required have and keep in force the following insurance coverages: Limits 1. Commercial General Liability on an occurrence basis with contractual liability coverage: General Aggregate $2,000,000 Products—Completed Operations Aggregate 2,000,000 Personal and Advertising Injury 1,500,000 Each Occurrence—Combined Bodily Injury and Property Damage 1,500,000 2. Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability: 16 Workers' Compensation Statutory If Operator is based outside the state of Minnesota, coverage must comply with Minnesota law. Employer's Liability. Bodily injury by: Accident—Each Accident 500,000 Disease—Policy Limit 500,000 Disease—Each Employee 500,000 An umbrella or excess policy over primary liability insurance coverages is an acceptable method to provide the required insurance limits. The above establishes minimum insurance requirements. It is the sole responsibility of Operator to determine the need for and to procure additional insurance which may be needed in connection with this Agreement. Upon written request, Operator shall promptly submit copies of insurance policies to Subscriber. Operator shall not commence work until it has obtained required insurance and filed with Subscriber a properly executed Certificate of Insurance establishing compliance. The certificate(s) must name Subscriber as the certificate holder and as an additional insured for the liability coverage(s) for all operations covered under the Agreement. Operator shall furnish to Subscriber updated certificates during the term of this Agreement as insurance policies expire. 15.2 Limitation of Liabilitv. The Parties will not be liable to the other Parry for general, special, punitive, exemplary, indirect, incidental or consequential damages arising from or out of this Agreement. The total liability of Operator to Subscriber under this Agreement will in no event exceed the aggregate of all payments made by Subscriber under this Agreement during the preceding twelve (12) months. Prior to the first anniversary of the Commercial Operation Date, the total liability of Operator to Subscriber under this Agreement will not exceed the estimated amount of payments for the first calendar year. That amount will be Subscriber's sole and exclusive remedy and all other remedies or damages at law or equity are waived. 16. COMPLIANCE 16.1 The Operator must comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, rules, and regulations, including any ruling of the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission (PUC). 16.2 Under the PUC Order in Docket Number E002/M-13-867, dated, the Operator will, at the request of Subscriber, provide documentation of continuing viability of the System, including but not limited to providing proof of sufficient financing; possession of required permits; certification of compliance with Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Form 556; or proof that the Operator has sufficient insurance to cover the ongoing installation, operation, or maintenance of the System. 17. MISCELLANEOUS 17.1 Integration: Exhibits. This Agreement, together with the Exhibits attached hereto, 17 constitute the entire agreement and understanding between Operator and Subscriber with respect to the subject matter thereof and supersedes all prior agreements relating to the subject matter hereof. The Exhibits attached hereto are integral parts of the Agreement and are made a part of the Agreement by reference. 17.2 Amendments. This Agreement may only be amended, modified or supplemented by an instrument in writing executed by duly authorized representatives of Operator and Subscriber. To the extent any amendment changes Subscriber's Allocated Percentage, such amendment shall include the representation by Subscriber set forth in Section 8.2(c). If in Operator's judgment any provision of this Agreement is reasonably expected to result in Operator's non-compliance with any provision in the PPA or the Tariff (as may be amended or revised from), the Parties will exercise commercially reasonable efforts to negotiate an amendment to this Agreement to conform to the applicable provisions in the PPA or Tariff. 17.3 Cumulative Remedies. Except as set forth to the contrary herein, any right or remedy of Operator or Subscriber shall be cumulative and without prejudice to any other right or remedy, whether contained herein or not. 17.4 Limited Effect of Waiver. The failure of Operator or Subscriber to enforce any of the provisions of the Agreement, or the waiver thereof, shall not be construed as a general waiver or relinquishment on its part of any such provision, in any other instance or of any other provision in any instance. 17.5 Survival. The obligations under Section 8.3 (Exclusion of Warranties), Section 9 (Taxes and Governmental Fees), Section 13 (Notices), Section 14 (Data Practices), Section 15 (Indemnification and Insurance), Section 17 (Miscellaneous), or pursuant to other provisions of this Agreement that, by their sense and context, are intended to survive termination of this Agreement, shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement for the period of the applicable statute of limitation. 17.6 Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota without reference to any choice of law principles. The Parties agree that the courts of Minnesota and the federal Courts sitting therein shall have jurisdiction over any action or proceeding arising under the Agreement to the fullest extent permitted by Applicable Law. 17.7 Severabilitv. If any term, covenant or condition in the Agreement shall, to any extent, be invalid or unenforceable in any respect under Applicable Law, the remainder of the Agreement shall not be affected thereby, and each term, covenant or condition of the Agreement shall be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by Applicable Law and, if appropriate, such invalid or unenforceable provision shall be modified or replaced to give effect to the underlying intent of the Parties and to the intended economic benefits of the Parties. 17.8 Relation of the Parties. The relationship between Operator and Subscriber shall not be that of partners, agents, or joint ventures for one another, and nothing contained in the Agreement shall be deemed to constitute a partnership or agency agreement between them for any purposes, 18 including federal income tax purposes. Operator and Subscriber, in performing any of their obligations hereunder, shall be independent contractors or independent parties and shall discharge their contractual obligations at their own risk. 17.9 Successors and Assigns. This Agreement and the rights and obligations under the Agreement are binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of Operator and Subscriber and their respective successors and permitted assigns. 17.10 Countemarts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same instrument 17.11 No Reliance. Subscriber is not relying on any representation, warranty or promise with respect to the Solar*Rewards Community Solar Program or the Solar System made by or on behalf of NSP or Operator, except to the extent specifically stated in this Agreement. 17.12 Records -Keeping. Operator will maintain books, records, documents and other evidence directly pertinent to performance of the work under this Agreement in accordance with generally accepted accounting and utility metering principles and practices, including all meter production records and adjustments thereto. Operator will also maintain the financial information and data used in preparation or support of the cost submission for any negotiated Agreement amendment and provide electronic, printed or copied documentation to the Subscriber as requested. These books, records, documents, and data must be retained for at least 6 years after the term of the Agreement, except in the event of litigation or settlement of claims arising from the performance of this Agreement, in which case the Operator agrees to maintain them until the Subscriber and any of its duly authorized representatives have disposed of the litigation or claims. 17.13 Audit. As required by Minnesota Statutes, section 16C.05, subdivision 5, the records, books, documents, and accounting procedures and practices of the Operator and of any subcontractor relating to work performed pursuant to this Agreement shall be subject to audit and examination by the Subscriber and the Legislative Auditor or State Auditor. The Operator and any subcontractor shall permit the Subscriber or its designee to inspect, copy, and audit its accounts, records, and business documents at any time during regular business hours, as they may relate to the performance under this Agreement. Audits conducted by the Subscriber under this provision shall be in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Financial adjustments resulting from any audit by the Subscriber shall be paid in full within thirty (30) days of the Operator's receipt of audit. 17.14 Dispute Resolution. Claims by the Operator disputing the meaning and intent of this Agreement or arising from performance of this Agreement must be referred in writing to the General Manager of Environmental Services of Subscriber for a written decision within 60 days after the dispute arises. The General Manager of Environmental Services or his/her designee must respond to the Operator in writing with a decision within 60 calendar days following receipt of the Operator's claim. Submission of a dispute or claim to Dispute Resolution is a condition precedent to the Operator initialing any litigation relating to this Agreement. Pending final decision of a dispute, the Parties will proceed diligently with the performance of the Agreement. Failure by the Operator comply precisely with the time deadlines 19 under this paragraph as to any claim shall operate as a release of that claim and a presumption of prejudice to the Subscriber. 17.15 Goodwill and Publicitv. Operator shall have the right to use graphical representations or photography of the System in marketing and promotional materials. Subscriber agrees to the use by Operator of Subscriber's name as a subscriber, if applicable, in Operator's marketing materials in connection with the System and any future Community Solar Garden program or similar projects undertaken by Operator. Operator agrees not to disclose any other Subscriber information in connection with Operator's marketing and promotional materials. Subscriber agrees not to use Operator's name, logo, trademark, trade name, service mark, or other Operator intellectual property in any marketing or promotional materials without the prior written consent of Operator. To avoid any conflicts with fair trade rules regarding claims of solar or renewable energy use and to help ensure that Environmental Attributes will be certified by Green- e® or a similar organization, Subscriber and Operator will consult with each other about press releases or public communications to help ensure that the Operator's rights to claim Environmental Attributes are not compromised while allowing both Parties to claim publicity. This section will not be construed to require Subscriber to obtain consent for any postings or publications required by law or undertaken by Subscriber in its capacity as a government entity. 17.16 Trade Secret Data Provided to Governmental Entities. Operator may provide data that it designates as trade secret to Subscriber. Under Minnesota Statutes section 13.37, subdivision 1(b), Subscriber is responsible for determining whether data marked as trade secret by Operator qualifies as trade secret under the law. For Operator data that Subscriber determines is trade secret, Subscriber will not share the data with any other Person or entity except as required by law. If Subscriber receives a request under the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act for access to data that Operator designated as trade secret but subscriber has determined is not trade secret, then Subscriber will use its best efforts to give the Operator ten (10) days' notice before releasing the data in order to permit the Operator to exercise whatever legal remedies are available to the Operator to prevent such disclosure. 20 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this Contract to be executed by their duly authorized officers on the dates set forth below. OPERATOR By: Name: Crain Cornelius Title: President SUBSCRIBER By: Printed Name: Title: 21 Exhibit A North■m StEwi Power Company, R Minnmula oorpolrtion MlnrraapCM4, 1.lrrinegola 5E4g1 MINPdMGTA MX TRIC RATE BWK- WPM KIO. 2 37ANDARD CONTRACT FOR 3OL WRffW C0MMJMITP {Continurd5 SOdDR No. $ Oviginal $LYRES No. n Attacryneto 'A' 5elarAMWMFM Cnlnraunity SuhrerblrABencyr Aryrywontand Conswn Farm Tro r W ensorod ('Svbscritwr') t4s a Sebserglion to the IbkwHny COMMMl y Solar Garden 0.--rr111RftV Sclar 6antan N2rflo: L`AMMllnliy :961ar Gefden Acar6&9: community saarGarARrY operstar Subecrlber Name; Ssitrecrlber+s Trceunl N umtrer wllh Harlhorn BEates Powor Corn p3 rYy: Cbr11rmurYlly 38132r Gbrderk contact Infonnallon far Suhe[rlber quesllvna and complalnis_ Address (If different From abava�; Takphoae number._ Emall alddrees; Web Stte URL S ubscrl bar Sorvlce Address where root-iving virctrltal serrlcc from Hbrihorrl Stale& Flower Compeay; (Continued on Sheet No. 9-M DO* Fik4 09-5cL13 K': 111wid ", 3Paft Rnwive DMM: 0917-14 Presdaniand CED of NDmhorn Sts5m Pumm Campmq, a Mlnnes#aoorporewn Dockm N4. EDIMA-13-967 order DAW: 4-17-14 65+�-4r�r6p-4rw5rw.sm�'4utir�r_isur._o m�e 22 i N Norlhem Slaiea Powar Company, a Mlrwiam a ccaparabon Mianeepcb. Mnneaate SM1 WNHESOT4 ELECTRIC RATE BOOK • WUC "0. 2 STANDARD GORTRACT FOR $edibn No 9 SOLAWREWARM OOMMUNITY (Coatinrrid� brlgnal Sheet No. W Dvslank9 Ods SoUr IIiie ds 4,'wmun0v Sumer AgMnCy agrwment8nd Consent Farm t1he 50soiWe pgr to as of the fWlrnnng: 1. Aeakinme.rrtodRenewalble I'_nerov Credits CRIM01. Enerov end Carla,dtvto Harmem Steiee Power Camoomr Ai MinrMsma comoratian. Tire Subscriber agNmz that 11-19 CommUnthr Sv4rGardlen Opwatar has Zvowrity toaealgn all energyprodw d and capacity asaooabad yim the phabmm ac energy ayrstem at the Community Saar Garden Ila Northam Slalae Power Company, and the Subscriber agrees thetalenergy prod uoer3, and capeGity asBooial wHh the Subscrihers share orlhe phobovollalcenar% slrslera a1 Me Commun?ly Solar Garden shell bW&q W Northern Shier. flower Company. The Subsonber also agrees that the Comnrunigr Salar Garden Opersbar has author9tyto as&Cn all RECs am v)ci ted MIN Ine ptlalcvoltar energy Dysiam at the C&wnririty Sdar Garden 1c Norlhem Stsks Payer Company, and Wt if the Community Saler Garden or a person or entity oa hs behalf hes assigned the RECs to Mbn?*rn SWkm PowC4epan4', ihm all RECy a&&WMad withihe SWdGi"n dura of %a pltotovonaic energy system at the Cmnairiity Safer Garden shall bNartrg to Nonhom Shies Power Carnpwy_ 2 Jax Imdirgpo. The GDminunMy Solar Gemien Opwatorliar. proeided the Sabsc*erwith a stabemant that Pi6,ltrerr Stades pft-ef Goniparny makaarlo represer5r8trarla onceming the I aGlecnnsequatYaes tache SubsommiryiUl respm W its Bin Credrle 1D the SLOsenberoramarUx issues rellaling tO partiripatian n the Community-%ar Garden. (CCmGr LW on MxW W. g.91) Date FIVed_ 09-36-13 By: ds»d M. Spozy Elfamm baa: M-17-14 l"mWentend CEO of North4m StOw Ppwmr Cipmpany, a Minnasato co wrmkm oodael "a ED=M-13-697 Order data: M-17-14 s,orwwcrMeu.oa.nwe t ncaeoe 23 Northam Slaleg Power Company, a Mmnesate corliarallon Minrsapons, IArrrheaote SW1 MbNNUQTA ELECTRIC RATE BGOK • MPUC NO. 2 STANDARD CONTRACT FOR Section Na. 9 9OLAWRE ARW COMMUNrrY (Continued) Original Sheat Na. 91 3. #larlhem States PmwCernpany hereby dl9doees to the Subscrtberlhai rl r"naes tret rrol ell b production riskfaators, such as grid-Wura events or nphpiralfy doudy xrealher_ erewrilhin the CommurWySdar 43arden Operaloes conVol. 1 4. Irdormallorn Sherirw ParlippaGng In tie SMarRmwvdsCawnLmtty Program wdl require sharing Subecribar's Aeaaunl lnfmvistlan frame aomurrtnumber, aerrioeaddnsris talephane number, email address, web arae URL. inlUrm31ibn oil Suhs[Ahef pii7Lipa'.in i rbiherdi3lfilCJbSd garbernlion Urving Cho "mi?C3 of ilk Subsrribsr. SuD&aritarapecrfiaAlll Crecid(si) and Subesrtbaem GnerW U&e Data lihe pask presets and future elL�lriury us;�yi: altnqul8410 to Alpe Svhst,,iber krr the "rviGB oddrd# pr4 4d-tbiviC numbgr ilonWd fpr pdrliGPllion in the Corr.muraty Solar Garden). The fol;awng outlines the "of infarmatian that whr be ahared, wind how that irthfhrioliMwill G9 uso. 11. Sut4driW%Ad40urw leikfW*Mri irWl Gwt thUrEft(dv Wane Dili, The Swwtrifte Mhotizft Narihem Slates Power CGrripenp to provide rhe CDrwurhity SDtar{3erden Operator;and Me CorrwnuW Salar C`,*rpte rilarA dcsignidad SubCG(WA,-lors Arid #g")5.ith ihp 5u4EQiWrS Awftht 111"*bOrl irld SWxcnbir'a Energy usage Data as descibed o 5esdt[M4 Wxwe. Thin informawn,e reDoed la elbwiha Gommordly Soot GiMon Op$rpler delennir+e the @*W b Y&ich it+# sv4sciter is 4rrtQ 4 to Girtcot►rt tho CammuW Soler Garden, and to aawats the amount of the Ern CreclU to n provkk 4y NorMem 5131)aa POWOr CvMWy 1A ft &ubsrarfer, Thu curroro dab privRry+ pdiciies of itythu- SWus Power Corrnparryapple to lbs Sdsrlkem die CGrnrnurhlty Frogmen provmd lc me Subsalbertfy me Camrnunrty Saar Garden Operator pursuant � �2�o�Arsaltad+a4 as E�hit�a 1 a+His Sclar`R4v+, ids CommUnegr SN4es�b4r Agvnvy Agtv�naam and CenurnLFenn. Twee povaey polrehes Imude definitions of'Smbeczhhar's Aco3urit Infarmsuorti and'Subsanbere Effm.rw usa9+ 0410,' X40"uqd on Sheet No 9.921 Date filed: 06 3413 9iy: ba%w M. Sparby Pfleaave Dela: 119.17.14 Presidentend CEO of North wn S1a1aa Fv%w Compenp, a MinnndH wgxweGan oadoi l No. foayM-13.w 0rdrer baSa: 119.17.14 s re 24 Normam Stapes Power Compepry, a Minpesvio conwation minrgkwlis, Minnowto X41 NNNE60TA ELECTRIC RATE 130 DK -18PUC NO. 2 STANDARD CONTRACT FOR $Fctipn No 9 601 AR'R EWA RDS COMMUNirY (Cominuedl Ong nal Sheaf Na 132 4. Information Shari rr4 (O mtinued) In. Srbsoaber's Subdtripjioa Inhumation: The Sut*c-HberautlroHm The Crammunrty Solar Garden Operator io provide infanrraiiori io Norlhem Slaiee Power Company kientifying the Sutrsrrlber(wMhthe Subsuibefs name. service address, and a=ual number)and cbtailing the share in killawratile offtlim Conrnurillyr Solar Garden arrdto pruvk% additional updateaef this infamiainon to Northern Statea Purer Company as cir um3kancds #5 n9e. This mf9rm0on is needled to allowKorllram Sthtes Power Company la prqmrhiapAy BIII Credits for the phakyMtaieeaergyf generated by the Community Solar Gsrdan. Asp. thi3 Int0m7alion Ismeedod to allow Nonlfnem $-labs Puwcr Company tvserrdto the Subsuiber nolim&orother mailinge parlalning I tfialr invahrementinthe S ar'Aa,vards Community Program. The C4mrrWI-ty $*rroftW 0" ator00 ryt diadoso $ut>sG W k1f4h1Tsitii0ii in anrwal reporlsnrolhw publiGdncumants eitxsenl axplinit infammd orxnaeni ham the Sutyacrltor. Tho 0cfnmu" Siler f3anclon Operatnrwill nal rolpW Orly $VWtibb+ dot* 10 thlpp poriioa oxocpt to bjlfg 1hre rWpI*ted puoouis of the SolaPRawards Community Program, to camplyMb a legal ormplaioly magdirement, or Lpan explHM, Intermed eonsanl horn the SaimuiW. c. �,algreslatad rrwbrrnaGan. Aggregated inromTatlanetnpsmirti9 pr0rk,gitn bl the Gynrrr,i+rih' Sral�rfiiarden moy0 puhlk;ly di Kbwd taski p;vrt reg ulatoryovemNhtafthe SolaeRewwds ODmmundy YroRrarn. This Includes amual reports available to The public related 10 apeahe Community Wor Qer¢gn$. inluting bO nqt limiW qcy pvduc5on tram the Community Saler Geldane: s -be, location and the type of Communrty Solar GaMn aubsanber groups; reporting on known complaints and the resaluiia'i ei ftsc-#wmpI*ts; bssons lgarnod ipnd arly poWtiar chxgea1u theSolar~Rew vds Communtig Program. repamng an Bill Credit&earnedand peel; and reporbrrg an the appl[ ation procees. AggreD&W iiNOmiation will no. itlenri Fy iidiuWv0 SVb5«ferS 4r pn7Vk% 6jpbSSnbef-Sp6Pfir. Aooranrrl lntimmion, SubsoiberSpecific Energy Usape Dale or Sutrealbw-spraafie BIN Crawa unlege a Swwriter praaldae eVIat Iniomwd crosent Dqx-nding-on the nature -90&e, g9"*d ii1rOrrrrabon. IrK e"r, it may Nlid! be poasilige to infer the arriouall of products n attributed is irdr ltduel Suhscntera to the Cammunirty Solar Gordan. The Sutrscrlbar agreasto the inclusion atrlsprodugGgn InForimMipn in the oroation orthe aggreq.A infum7 kit The Cprynunity Solair0amien OperawwO noluseaggrageted infarmetion forpurpoaes unrelated totha Saleir'kewwds Ccmiinwilty Program tirilhoutllrat pmvjlrip noticearrd oNsining fiyl 00rrsamt. unless the aggiregpldd information is odrerMw available as pnrbliGiifarmad n. The polices of Northam Sialea Power Company nNaledin aharing aggregated Informallon are part of the date priv" policies cant, road in tho atlachrod Exhibit i -pf this Sgkr`RitwArd4 Carrimuully Sukmrdt er Agency Agwaernentand Consent Form and ahauld tie provided tottra Sutrsaiterby the Cornnwnity Saler Garden Operalcr pureuprd $*dim 3obov4. d. Inromution Reg6,g31s From the MPUC eff fhb Departmom of Commerce. The Sub&uibeff Rprwe that the Ccmmunitd Saar -Garden Qperatorand Northam 5tatea Power Company are aulhoriaed W proride any Inkf"tipm Ihaypoeseas Waled toiho Subscriber or the uubuxiborlz parlicipaiipn in the Conirnunitir Soler Garden to Ina Minrreeolm Public Utilities Gormissian (MPUC}, the Umnegola Department of Comnieree, or The Minnesota Office of Aitoawy General. Thi3 rr"oIji0n is heeded toBAowprWorrig 9uto(4ry overnight of Norl!- r Stalem PuoarOampairp and of the Salar•Rewards CDrnmurAyF Program. (OonIJnued on Sheet No 9.931 Dale Fled: DOL -30-13 By: David M. Sperhy Eifed+ve Date: M17.14 President and CEO &Uodlwrn Slapoa Pow.or Gampany, a Minoesvlecorwi-ation DodketNo. E{IO2jM-13-867 25 OrdarDam- 09617.14 Nartmem States power Company a M nnmma corporation MinnoaQolis, Minresola 55401 WNNE9WA ELECTRIC RATE BOOT{ - MPLFC NO.2 STANDARD COWRACT FOR WgiiM NC. 9 SOLAR'REWARDS COMMUNITY (Conllnwmil Rine Sheet No. 93 4. Imilkw hm $hadre. i;C"lirlubd) e. l.ia4ilikr Role xe NorjhW VAte$ N""f C.""nY $411 not bo mspcn$ible for merutorirg or ialrirg arq steps to eneum thatlhe Carrimwnity Sclar Garden Openatormelntelne tr*writlWnbollty ai the SUb9CrkMre ALODdrit linronT 000M, 1114 $al• Energy Usega or Vro Diu C.redils reaoi+wd pe1ldir=19 1v ft Subsc ibark parlicipativn in the CE rrmnfty Slier{iaruen. Hmmver, NDMwrn Sietea Pa%rCanWsny Own remaln 110"a iar Itaown Inapprapnale +elastica of Subo rrahaonml Irllarma6on and Subscriber's Energy Use Data f purarkm of canaUA The Subscriboes coneenl DD this mFmma4an smadrq shall ba ongaing for the Term of the ls`w reCtmhw&en MBC rnirm"tV Sour Garden Operator End 1orthern Slate& Pouf Cofr ny, br ufLU the Subscriber no lonjur has a Subsoripbvn to the Ccrmwnity Solar Garden arrd the Community Saler Garden CMretar nodMd Northern Slates Pmmr company of this led [Hough the CSG App[ -- ti System. PmwkW. hm%evar, Me &t scriberk oonserrtshar aFo applytherealberia as such inkwmeton of the Subsr..riberpertaining to that period of tree tlurrrrg which Me S r had a SubwApbion to 1ha Community Soler Q8rden. 9 Mry lk-,PtiGrr. The atMe pM%1i9i0ns awrassing data p %mcy and in ExhMit 1 $hall rem*n ithoMgnoI and trAow ofher ragrw-emerrts are adoplw by the MPUC in h generic wWcy praaeeding, Du&Bt Na E,696Rr'CI- 12-13+44, or other MPUC Order. Norlhem States Pff&w Comrparyy shall We n&msswy wislorq 10 Its thrift end corrt-scu w0hin thirty {W days of a h Order. Subscriber's Name: Subscribar's Signalurec Dale: l`C,MrMW on $11pat No. 9-4i Data Filed: 030-13 By: Dayid M. Sparby Effacwe fJste: W17-14 P+R1*Mt fnO C94? 'r Nerthem $k.LY* Por'+4r' Gowipmy 7 k6nnssoW vwwrMion DGdw No E04?7h1-1xwT Ortler Date: (10-17-14 a raavnrun�-ao�*rerwxwwr�xrtrxwr_�e.uo-a 26 NwIvirn States Paver Oompeny, a Minnegaia aarparsbon knnewolis. Minnesota 55401 MINNESOTA ELECTRIC RATE BOOK • MPUC N13. 2 STAN DARD CONTRACT FOR Sfcrw Nts 4 SOLAWREWARDS COMMUNITY gCenllnu8d) CAgloel Sham UD &t Exhlblti tv A%srhment "A" to SararRewarrda Cornmunhy SubecriberAggnry Agnwnunt and Consent Form Data Pri4aey Polioaea of Northam States P4;,war Company P4)rtRining to tha Solsr'Rewards Comrnunity Wing rain TtNO 0610 PMAXypglipp# ql NOrthOM UjWe%Py,Or C4mppry pe"nirgln the $(Or'Rewsrds Community Program ora ss folbm end maybe dtrsnged flan tfneta lime s&flsd m the Comwe aterifl or saotha4ae may be authorized bythe Minnesota Public Vilitin C;*mwrft)lpn CMPUC'): 1}aflnItlons Un6im irl "ed MF*O irpk Mo SOM dOntlibn and nie..aning od term% in ihis ¢oqurnentsra rhe same as cpmWred in the Standard iWDWsst far Sokulbmer& Community. For ease of referenoe, Gere ere some of the sparifro definftne: 'CornpaW rneerts IA"am ShsM& PotiwerCaTgmrry, a Mlnnesots corpor4wii, and its efGlates. arndagerita. 'Sutsalbed Energy ml}ermaeleclncatygeneretad Wythe RYSysiam eWtbtitshle Ga111a 5m�eaibers' S�mhscapuansand delivered l4 the Cornpgrry et tho Pradu[l;Gn M14ir wr Gf Erf4br the Dp1lw Qf CtarYirrierual ppi}rp4dn, 'GLUrribee means A retail watornar of ft Comp*M who Owm orlb W MO(6 5*V- 'I0s OFy Wmmunily s4ltr gam len Interrcanrieded with the Company. 'Sutx�nDSYa Aoc>}mrmt Indurrnahon' aetne+ata of 115e SuGarnGar'a ne�ne, sax�lnt ntmrnber, aBm\'FC8 edttreas, lsiephomte number. email oddnsa�weta site URL, ir�4nnalianOn $ubiaibdr PdrtG�atiW1 � ti�disl+#�ted 94rbsri sM'�9 the premlasanf Ina Sutrstrmbar, and Sut &WberaFeoftall cmNa). 'SLbunmes Energy Wage Oiata' kindwas the pest prea mwd Gars eleow-ty usage attriNnUe to the Subsr-rib9r for tha mmviceaddress and aaoaunt nWnber id4WI1W fWpodiripalion in the Coftn{rnity SoUr68NMh iCorirmwW om Shael No. 9-61 Date Faetl: 19-30-13 By: Dsvmd M. Sperhy Effscmlve Dace: iii 7-14 Preeidenl end CEO of Norihom States Power Carnpany, a Minr*soia wrparabon ❑ocMt No. EQVi5-4%7 Order Date: OM4-14 � ��rr-OrrsGdm4yr�kvF�.Cunnwul+ellirAwiaet 27 Northam Gtaws PvWvr{'.vm"ny, a minnoevta oarpombon M nrowils, Mlnne•w8 554131 MINNESOTA ELECTRIC RATE BOOK - WUC NO. 2 STANDARD CONTRACT FOR Sertiorr No. 9 $QLdR'nEWARDS COMMUNITY (Cgrrtlnppdj Orlgm*l $h" no 95 0 7hie aecban addresses Plow Subr'e Aocounr Infcrmanon and SWacritxWe Energy Usage Data will tecollecGsd, used *nd $hVW *s PM of p* 101:4" 0 A"SOI1r'RVWVVS Pr"Mm 11 g6w $utrrodber s Io wwnt Infornution UM Erwmr Usage Dala Will Bn Exchanaod 0. SuNviber specific In 0ffM*;kA Once a SclasrrAperPiss emouted a SubsulbarAgency Agreemerd and Conserd Farm, anccgolr9dala excharVe wdccwr behaeen She Company and a Curnrnunity Solar Garden OReralor *W their doaigwked subconWdors and agonh); Th@ COrYtp* y mWI diWM the ftAowing $449~SpWfiCin"loom to "0 C*r Wity $(OrGlir6o O"Wor f Subtuibeev,h ounllnkm"irn Subscmbara EneDw Uwe Dag Bill credits [ii} Tr* community DolerGarden Opera wYdIl disclose tolhe Companylhe kvlmng 3lydaarCer-speclAa nk mation: • Sub#criWaAoNxmtlnWrnebnn • Cmrnmuntty Saler Carlon Albcation for each Stl saritrerrs SuNoiption stawd in kW Pro*J00 dot* relied tn-lho PV $Y#tem • Monthly SubmApidonInformation b AQVegeded Subeaiber Inikmahon ApgreyelPad Subs 4t@rinformolionvrill be reRorted as part of Permitled Public.Remrlirq- oudirred in Sedan 2{b}below. Tape x»ru5idered'a7gmemgated' the ruporRA intom-arlion must include information Wft1 letble to 911 Subauib" pw idpalAg in a speiik Sdmr'Ra wsrOs Community program safe, ti,Mlch Cased an program requremente vdll oontaln a minRnJm of five Subeoribem. Dependiral on the nedure of the aWregated indarmalion. howarer, from IIRF irrFurmerlion obne at In o5mbinalion,Ylh a1mr pl.Clldy ava=e a Infarmallon It Inay Will be passlblelo Infer Me arnaurrtof proft%Dn aftrlbufad to-indiwidual Subserbaraln the Communily SdarGarden. N (CGrrfinued nn Shaer Flu 9-N) DIM* Fwd; I;*9¢1$ aY Dom M. $DM4y efrerhve Gape. Q}17.14 Preeiderd end CEDof Northam States Power Conmmrry, a Mimxmaou corparefion DGdret No. EOWAG13-g$7 Order Date 0$17-14 g�grp�-pp�rva.n.enn_r.esr._ an de 28 Narmem States Puwar Company, a Minivi"a. corporation Minnwolis, Mir-vtota 56401 MINNESOTA ELECTRIC RATE HOUK - NPUC NI]- 2 STANDARD CONTRACT FDR $ettign Ha 9 30LAWME`t1 ARDS COMMUNITY IContlnuedl Ongrnel Sheet No. 96 H6W SLJbddrLb&ri Irifbrmilion Will Be Ust-A The fNloVdVCtttMne9h0* Ihd 5v"0*ar't AWWM Ie1Orm0liO1V •rid 4ubs0bee I:nhrgy UsayC Qala will by used as par# OF 1he, SDar*PAwarde Commisnity PrWam. Pragrarn Managemem A* pjrt or;)drninisgering the Soli)r•R"rd* Community pro�Mm, the Solaro Garden Operator and the Company may provide infarmaGan relsted to the Suberribmarndrar the Community 8owv8srden to: • tho NPUC • the Minnesota Department d Commerce i the Mirtnaeala Ofte of Attorney General . 41hergowernmeMal or pmvole arditiesas requirOby I#w or ragulaGon Antionslly, as partaf adrmnisiBwg dw Sdar-Rwwdatommurdr program, the CcrnNmy may ansre Subacribarm At!ouni InrgrmMion and Subsuftq Erwgy Usag►Oaia tc swrviam provides. agents, or conbamd agents wfio support tha program on b behalf. TheCmpanyprohbts masa seance prrnrldere. ham using ordlacoaYrg the Subecrlbere iniam7alipn bxC�pk.'rs rti4�4ssaryio perform Ilheso spedn9c a#�'�S Or kOGwnptywith legal raqu�emanis r{igre inrarrnaGon about the t;onrpeny's Qenarel privacy prs,ctloaera eoLpleinned In I� PrrrracyPallgavaiehle�nwwer.r�oe9enerav_rxtinn. Permitted PLOalic RepDdnq The sub3C3Libers Energy Usago ostia OF 600 pprlippalirg 50sr*er to A communis Sdar G6nrdfn will be wmbined and repartad in dw aggregate ty me Ocnnnmity Saar Gwden Operator in Hearin uaP meport onto Somr kewarda Comrnuntty prggrsrn. The ideolilyof spqcifiCSubd4tWS, rh specftliubscriger's AccourltlnformabOp, Sulk ibK# Envoy UhmpR tiara and Subscriber-spEdfia OA Crimm will not be listed wi the public arcual mp 3ft uwasa via Sutscrlear nsa pravkJad me C,pmmunitySOlw Garden OperftrvAth privrwitwn consent Per thw mquimmxmts of the MPUC, the Gompanf%ill provide tache MPUC annual mpoftwhirh will include i nfarmapon or dsts requmreted bythe MPUC cc Mlnrom*w Derpsrvmemoi Common:&•, irdwhrrg the lbiwrrng: f4epartlrgcn5dsrRerrrerds Cammunrryprndgrarn date, rrdudlrg an anslyain of the daposd. applirallan- partldpatIm and metering leea and iuM juatrficaban lortheea feeagNng larward; + R"diry On the SckrRewards Corrrnunity Gardena. including but rnol Iirrni%x3 to siw location and the Mm of S01Ar'R*A;+ rds Quw nu*v PA*b riwr 4r0ups; Reporlirng on kwom oanptwnbs and the *s Ljuon arthaie eamplalnrl3; + A appy of mach aanbraul syrisd with a Communrgr Soler Garden Operator, If none prowicun#y filed; Leseuns learned and airy poiartM ohartgas to the program; • Repan an Dir u019 eamedand paid; andthe ' impE4n proo�,ss fCaotiruad on SMal. No. 96071, Date Filed- W30-13 DY: Dam M. Spanby Effnaebve Data: M17-14 Praydentwel CE;1-6tNortham SU*i PararCGmWy, F Minn4$ota O"rMiC6 Dodwift E0021M-13 7 e w.r.r.4dr�-atticvaerua�w.rw+o-+++rr+L��a.�w._a_tae.mo 29 Osier Data: M17-14 iNarttrem Statea PowerUnWany, a Minnesota onrparalloan Minrwp4lis. Mimewu 5-5401 MINNE90TA ELECTRIC RATE BOOK - MPUC Nfl- 2 STANDARD CDMTRACT FOR 0Gn No, B SILAR REWARDS COMMUNITY 1Conlleued] 15tPWYIBBd Sheat Na. 0 2. Haw Si,bserlCeirs lWarmafJonWll So Udad fCnnfiriu&d� Prohdrted Reporting or Sharing ExoW asolherwiss provided in Ilus dccurnerl, the CompanyWIl nut diw se the SubscribarsAuwwm Information, Suncoriber's Energy Usage Date or 5uh9crlber peaGc &II Crgdlt# to a Intl party witfloul first dAmnieg the SutracrMr !i wribn consent any requests by the Community Sdmr Garden Operstoria the Carnpeny for irriarrnabon abauta Subsciiberlhal is rrol SubscriWRAcaourrtlMarrnaiianof Subacmer s Energy us$ge Dma"ll require wiewwri ora $"wale vmxlen Oonsenl by the Subscriber. HlotwithateridirgttR previous alalernBm, the GDmpanywill notpmAdethe Gorrrnunrty Solar Garden Operabrwilh the Suhwc iber's Social SecunlyHrrn40rX10!#d74Obfd $OdG fO 4Y M MPUC Or MineaiOIA DOpar"Ont*f Carnmercecrcarnpeted by law or npulaton. ]. SqlmdherLoata Aeneas and CarreetlQp Tire fdtawing mAirree whet rn DMNIban is evallaW la the Subscilterfrom the Ccrrrpanyand the Community 9derGarden OLVat f. #rid rM1O "$6Of *0tftWg *riy irpi�Gurl, Gms a. IhNiMalJon Avoi!4414 fWh tho Cgmparry $Wb%r r n r,*(l wrist the Corny'$ oil Gtntor taoblain irrvrmaGon p9dairring la thoir wor ilk Bill Credit al UA -Able to their perticipetion in 5darmRawarie Ccrnmunity Program. The correcum ail ony all=Won of prewausty-applied Bill Crecima among Sutxsp I)m Or payments t*li* GOrr'rrnuni�jSotar Gardon Oiperalor for UraikKi-bed UnvNv, pena■nng ho -a pert) mr monde am tip Eny ineac,trwy reflected In sun mormly SubsarVAo Infannauon with regard to a SLItw itx s S0S00W in the Pv F-v3W rr #aE 1heWelicol ShOr* Or pl:m-*�jO or-"!rprodv *d by the PIV FYwwri. 4rlhe shore -40 Un9ub&Abed Energy, ahelt be the NII meporeibivy of Me Community Solar Gargan Operator, unlace Such mamurades am rmvFd by Ow Cvrnpvny Subscribers they' atsa obiRin kam 1hR Gornpa^Y My kAyMrig info—Aion reacted lO"Solmr+Rewatds Ca7wnLrrity program vAmautadtainlrrpwnroen consent from ire Cammunrry Solar Garden Operator. • COmmunyly Spear Gdrdirin Addrmss Oven3tor name Namep14W Mp*:My Production data related to Via PV aystam s Bi CP dit Rahe and Wal arnorlrt of 13+11 Creditsapaied to the PV &ystcm • fMcrther INkHMI lion pertalning to"Sksviws Subecrrption Other information r"ardiRpth* Cvmmunhe SdarGan%n Opermwkrwnmto ft Gampany*II not tae disclosed unless the Subeerltercblana pnoreWo A Infannedinneantlram the Camnwnity SdarGarden Operalor or urfeas drrecled Ia da sa by Ute MPUC or Minnesota aacparV"M of Garnm*roe or compelled by Ipw or rugLfakOn. f6Wtinued an Sheet No. 9•13111j Dasa Filed' U-21-16 By; ChriroWher B. Clark Eftdivu Osla: 4 11-16 Prealuerrt. Northam 5latea Power Company, a Mirviamts forparatlon OoddM Ifi) EOOZW19 3 Order Data: W -21-11B W Nodhorn Shies Power Company s M nnesals oarporatwn Minneapolis. Winesids 5MG1 MINNESOTA ELECTRIC RATE BOOK . MPUC NO- 2 STANDARD CON3RA CT FOR When No 9 501LAIR`REWARO5 COMMUNITY (S andflued) Onpinel Srmt No. iM 3. a Access and Corractlan tCominuudY b. Infomwipn Avoilab4Rfrom ihoiGom kn unity SolbeC rddn Operelor Subsrrtbare and praep &Ns subscrlbere can aanlad the CammunrtySaler Gartlan Opersior to onion the fallo" infarmetiun: + Future [Adis and banoslA5 at the SubScrlplWn, Indudng: i. All narwtwrriag (m Q., arre-hrej alrarges; u. All rewrang rnarges; III. Tem"S *nd oWil>3ns8f SetviBFr- Iv- 45Frether ar►yr charges mey increase during Lha course of serape, and if so, how much advarroe Mace is pruned to the Sul qtr, w- V%wilwthe Subscritrer may be mquiredwso storm contredl; ai. Tormssnd corrdioom%fpr awryiermi"im W. Ary pBwhieaihat" CommunirfSolar Garden mmycharge to- the Suhscnber, Wiii, The proms for a subscrilniv and arq ossoW*d outs. be An exptenetian of 1he Subs[ er dale rna CimmmuDfly Solaff Garden Operaror W11 sMrB with North wn 5t*w Power CpmpMy W4 1hM Npryr M Sbbn Power ii9moomy wA sKwe w0 the CommunrrySalar Oamen Operator, x Th* data pOv6 (vOidesof Norihnm Slatos Pgwmr C.ornpany acrd of In* Community Soler Gardam Operalor, xi. Th* method of providing notica I;* Subaaibcrs vdwn div Commwnitx $0101 G#rden is oW of service, rrdlading nadca al ashmatad IenVh and Iris d produebon; xii. Asuranab(M 311 inMaXWms, upgrades and mpairs via be undbrdired'yrmperviiipn 4F# NABCEP-eriMed sdar profeeeranat and Chad mslntenarwe wit to performed acoading to- indudbx atarrdwda, iiduding lhrp m*wnaiwWabom of tho m¢nuF;*0jr*hk Of yplpr p*nel% aW other operational companame; xiii. Allxation OF unr ulowrlmd prWwu iW: arW xlv. A sr'alernentthat" Cwmunrty Salw Garden Operatarla salary reepanerore far reeDNirtg any dwuteswith Nor#mQm Skates POnmr C tonygrlhb S4scd1mr *WiA t1rft Of Ihp Community Solar Garden prodwtlon err61hart N x1r*rf States P~ Company is safely reapunsiblefor resolving srr� disputes whhtha Sulaarriberabatd the appliwbla ra49 uaQd 4o- determine the amount cd the RIII Credrl. Capyol the oontrad Win mmnern States PoAwCcmpanyfor me Solw-Rwowds CDMmunrty Program • Copyo(thesdarpmnelwarranty + De1 toW 4f the 4]mpeasaiian to be paid for any undarpar brmsnae • Proof of navrence s Prca(of4kkAg-lermmainlonanwp4in Curred prcduchon prajedlons and a descrlptlan DfthemBthodokV used m develop prcdkHAkm Pp4ecAmne + Comrnuniy War Gar&P Opermtoroomtmd information for guestvnsand oNTg4airrts Demanstraw talkie Subscriber by the Community Saar Garden Operator thsl It has auffldem fioMalo apenale and mak4eirr dhe Sdar•Rewerda Comntiuntty Program fComin.red on $Peet No. 9,96] Date Filed: OQL3l3 OF. It}Rwd M. Sparby Edfed" Date. 09-17-14 Presldsntand CEO al Northam 3lales Paiver Comparyr, a Minnasots owparailon Docdaml ND. E007fM-13-96T Order Dato- W17-14 &SiW�Y OrWmlA401F5 rryMW�4r[�nrbKhlNtl/Yr_9 94l do; 31 MorMrern States Power Company, & Minnesota o pomtiw Minneapolis. Minnaeula 55441 MINNESOTA ELECTRIC RATE BOON • MPUC N10- 2 STAN DAR6CONTRACT FQR Seaiontft 9 SOLAWREWAROS COMMUNITY (Coaalnuam) 1st Revised Sheet ift D9 3. Subecrihor QgU Across and Gwrnctlan Infgrmelign AvailoNpfrpm the Cornrriuni4r Sollar Garden Operator jConbnued] The Communlby SDmr{Bsrism Oparalor Isaolely reWmlbla for lbe$ca emyoi the S+ubWbeft !m1ra aline rOmrnonity g4I0f GElyden pro*cliarr irrf7rrrrAli4n Forwarded to)lhe Company. and should resoW vMh the SubaMber-any disAula mgardhlg the wxuracyof' such Informailm. Sulmonbersi can gubmn ccmmaals is HM Owpern' on Mra atwraty and Wvioate"$$ of d! *nnuoil OOM qv tori sdi A $RCMN&C nM�g . a. Data Rotwnloo The Cwwyr will retain the Subsaiberra Acwunt PrAymatkm, Sm criWa Energy Uespe Data and information on BIR Cra-du for as Imig as rewlmd under epplwable law. dale Fired: 07-21-16 By: ChnstGpher B.Olerk Ef mbwa Bate: C&11-16 President, Norlherrr Slaw P&w& l oimparry, 4 Minngsg% mrppr-OWn Dodwc No. E402IM-13-%? Order Dasa: G6-21-19 32 EXHIBIT B Certain Agreements for the Benefit of the Financing Parties 1. Financing Partv Conditions. In order to finance the development and operation of the System, Operator may borrow money from a Financing Party (as defined in the Agreement). Subscriber acknowledges that Operator may finance the acquisition, development, installation, operation and maintenance of the System with financing or other accommodations from one or more financial institutions and that Operator's obligations to the Financing Party may be secured by, among other collateral, a pledge or collateral assignment of the Agreement and a first priority security interest in the System (collectively, the "Security Interest"). In order to facilitate the necessary financing, Subscriber consents to Operator's granting to the Financing Party the Security Interest. Subscriber acknowledges and agrees that: (i) Subscriber and all of Subscriber's rights under the Agreement are and will be subject and subordinate to the Security Interest (and as later modified by any and all renewals, modifications, supplement, amendments, consolidations, replacements, substitutions, additions, and extensions); and (ii) no amendment or modifications of the Agreement is permitted without the Financing Party's written consent. 2. Financing Partv's Default Rights. If Operator defaults under the financing documents with the Financing Party, the following provisions apply: A. The Financing Party, through its Security Interest, will be entitled to exercise any of Operator's rights and remedies under the Agreement. The Financing Party will also be entitled to exercise all rights and remedies of secured parties generally with respect to the Agreement and the System. B. The Financing Party will have the right, but not the obligations, to pay all sums due from Operator under the Agreement and to perform any other act, duty, or obligation required of Operator, and to cure any default by Operator in the time and manner provided by the terms of the Agreement. Nothing requires the Financing Party to cure any default by Operator (an "Operator Default") under the Agreement, to perform any act, duty or obligation of Operator under the Agreement, unless the Financing Party has succeeded to Operator's rights under the Agreement, but Subscriber hereby gives Financing Party the option to do so. C. If the Financing Party exercises its remedies under the Security Interest in the System, including any sale by the Financing Party, whether by judicial proceeding or under any power of sale, or any conveyance from Operator to Financing Party (or its assignee) in lieu of sale, the Financing Party will give Subscriber notice of the transfer or assignment of the Agreement. If Financing 33 Party exercises these remedies, it will not constitute a default under the Agreement, and will not require Subscriber consent. D. Upon any rejection or other termination of the Agreement under any process undertaken with respect to Operator under the United States Bankruptcy Code, Subscriber agrees to enter into a new agreement with Financing Party or its assignee under substantially the same terms as the Agreement if Financing Party so requests within ninety (90) days of the termination or rejection of the Agreement. E. At Operator's request, Subscriber agrees to execute and deliver to Financing Party and Operator such acknowledgment consent as may be required by Financing Party and in which Subscriber acknowledges and confirms that the legal and beneficial ownership of the System remains in Operator, or its affiliate, and that the System is the property of Operator, or its affiliate. 3. Financing Partv's Right to Cure. Regardless of any contrary terms in the Agreement: A. Subscriber will not terminate or suspend the Agreement unless Subscriber has given the Financing Parry prior written notice of Subscriber's intent to terminate or suspend the Agreement describing the event giving rise to the alleged Operator Default, and provide the Financing Parry with the opportunity to cure the Operator Default within sixty (60) days after such notice or any longer period provided for in the Agreement. If the Operator Default reasonably cannot be cured by the Financing Party within the period established under the Agreement, and the Financing Party commences and continuously pursues the cure of such Operator Default within that period, the period for cure will be extended for a reasonable period of time under the circumstances, but not to exceed an additional thirty (30) days. Operator's and Subscriber's respective obligations will otherwise remain in effect during the cure period. B. If the Financing Party or its lawful assignee (including any buyer or transferee) acquires title to or control of Operator's assets and within the applicable time period cures all defaults under the Agreement existing as of the date of such change in control in the manner required by the Agreement and which are capable of cure by a third party, then the Financing Party or such third party buyer or transferee will no longer be in default under the Agreement, and the Agreement will continue in full force and effect. C. At the request of Financing Party and/or its assignee, Subscriber agrees to execute and deliver any document, instrument, or statement (but not including any payment) required by law or otherwise as reasonably requested by Financing Party or its assignee in order to create, perfect, continue, or terminate the security interest in favor of Financing Party in all assets of Operator, and to secure the obligations evidences by the Security Interest. 34 Solar System Site Location: Anticipated Commercial Operation Date: Solar System Size: Retail Service Address: Subscribers Allocated Percentage: Exhibit C Description of Svstem Stearns County September 1, 2018 1,000 kw (AC) (representing an initial estimate, which may vary depending on the final design of the System) 505 Walnut St, Monticello, MN 55362 Premise #303021733 Account #51-6505911-8 Allocated Percentage: 40% 35 Exhibit D The kWh Rate shall be 11.95¢/kWh ("kWh Rate") with 0% annual escalator Estimated Annual Delivered Energv Estimated Annual Delivered Energy commencing on the Commercial Operation Date, and continuing through the Term, with respect to the System under the Agreement shall be as follows: 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 1,995,473 40.0% 798,189 $0.1195 1,985,495 40.0% 794,198 $0.1195 1,975,568 40.0% 790,227 $0.1195 1,965,690 40.0% 786,276 $0.1195 1,955,861 40.0% 782,345 $0.1195 1,946,082 40.0% 778,433 $0.1195 1,936,352 40.0% 774,541 $0.1195 1,926,670 40.0% 770,668 $0.1195 1,917,037 40.0% 766,815 $0.1195 1,907,451 40.0% 762,981 $0.1195 1,897,914 40.0% 759,166 $0.1195 1,888,425 40.0% 755,370 $0.1195 1,878,982 40.0% 751,593 $0.1195 1,869,588 40.0% 747,835 $0.1195 1,860,240 40.0% 744,096 $0.1195 1,850,938 40.0% 740,375 $0.1195 1,841,684 40.0% 736,673 $0.1195 1,832,475 40.0% 732,990 $0.1195 1,823,313 40.0% 729,325 $0.1195 1,814,196 40.0% 725,679 $0.1195 1,805,125 40.0% 722,050 $0.1195 1,796,100 40.0% 718,440 $0.1195 1,787,119 40.0% 714,848 $0.1195 1,778,184 40.0% 711,273 $0.1195 * For the purposes of the table Term year 1 shall commence on the Commercial Operation Date The values set forth in the table above are estimates of (i) the kWhs of Delivered Energy expected to be generated annually by the System and (ii) the portion of the Delivered Energy generated annually that is to be allocated to Subscriber pursuant to Subscriber's Allocated Percentage, which amount is derived by multiplying the estimated Delivered Energy by the Subscriber's Allocated Percentage in each year. The table will be updated upon final design of the System; provided, however, any such updated values shall also be estimates and in no event shall any such values (whether or not updated) be considered to be binding in any way on Operator. 36 Exhibit E Termination Fee 2 40.00% $858,412 3 40.00% $837,380 4 40.00% $815,532 5 40.00% $792,821 6 40.00% $769,200 7 40.00% $744,615 8 40.00% $719,013 9 40.00% $692,336 10 40.00% $664,522 11 40.00% $635,508 12 40.00% $605,226 13 40.00% $573,605 14 40.00% $540,569 15 40.00% $506,039 16 40.00% $469,932 17 40.00% $432,158 18 40.00% $392,624 19 40.00% $351,233 20 40.00% $307,880 21 40.00% $262,456 22 40.00% $214,846 23 40.00% $164,927 24 40.00% $112,572 25 40.00% $57,643 * For the purposes of the table Term year 1 shall commence on the Commercial Operation Date ** The Termination Fee is based on the Subscriber's Allocated Percentage at the time of termination. The Termination Fee listed on the Effective Date is based on Subscriber's Allocated Percentage on the Effective Date. 37 Exhibit F Leeal Description [To be attached within 120 days of execution of the PPA] 38 nrgo Ch Fixed Rate Inputs $0.1195 2017 Bill Credit $0.1238 2017 Rate Increase 2.03 2018 Rate Increase 0.00 2019 Rate Increase 1.69 Bill Credit Esc. (2021-204; 2.90 NRG's SSA Esc. Discount to Bill Credit $0.0100 Floor Rate ($/kWh) $0.0950 Assumptions: Annual Solar Degradation 0.50% Term 25 Years I Net 25 -Year Savings $4,408,022 Rate Table 0.0% $0.1195 1.0% $0.1110 2.5% $0.0970 Net Present Value $2,685,690 Discount 3.00 Minnesota Community Solar Gardens Solar Subscription Agreement (SSA) Pricing City of Monticello Proforma Customer's Customer's Max Offtake from Subscription 0 scion% of Load Counties Load (kWh) CS (kWh) from CS from CS Covered W%A hi (MWdc) Wriqht 4,903,092 r rrr 4,011,000 • 4,903,092 4,011,000 iii ICustomer's Bill credits from % of bill Payments to Customer's % savings Bill, solar, covered by NRG, net bill, from solar, Pre -solar ($) Year 1 credits Year 1 Post -solar Year 1 r. r $400,000 $350,000 $300,000 $250,000 $200,000 $150,000 $100,000 $50,000 Net Savings 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Years nrg o Ch Fixed Rate Inputs 2017 Bill Credit $0.1238 2017 Rate Increase 2.03 2018 Rate Increase 0.00 2019 Rate Increase 1.69 Bill Credit Esc. (2021-204; 2.90 NRG's SSA Esc. Discount to Bill Credit $0.0100 Floor Rate ($/kWh) $0.0950 Assumptions: Annual Solar Degradation 0.50% Term 25 Years I Net 25 -Year Savings $3,881,264 Rate Table 0.0% $0.1195 1.0% $0.1110 2.5% $0.0970 Net Present Value $2,440,713 Discount 3.00 Minnesota Community Solar Gardens Solar Subscription Agreement (SSA) Pricing City of Monticello Proforma Customer's Customer's Max Offtake from Subscription 0 scion% of Load Counties Load (kWh) CS (kWh) from CS from CS Covered W%A hi (MWdc) Wriqht 4,903,092 r rrr 4,011,000 • 4,903,092 4,011,000 iii ICustomer's Bill credits from % of bill Payments to Customer's % savings Bill, solar, covered by NRG, net bill, from solar, Pre -solar ($) Year 1 credits Year 1 Post -solar Year 1 r. r Net Savings $400,000 - $350,000 - $300,000 - $250,000 $200,000 - $150,000 $100,000 - $50,000 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Years r nrg o Ch Fixed Rate Inputs 2017 Bill Credit $0.1238 2017 Rate Increase 2.03 2018 Rate Increase 0.00 2019 Rate Increase 1.69 Bill Credit Esc. (2021-204; 2.90 NRG's SSA Esc. Discount to Bill Credit $0.0100 Floor Rate ($/kWh) $0.0950 Assumptions: Annual Solar Degradation 0.50% Term 25 Years I Net 25 -Year Savings $3,256,671 Rate Table 0.0% $0.1195 1.0% $0.1110 2.5% $0.0970 Net Present Value $2,201,066 Discount 3.00 Minnesota Community Solar Gardens Solar Subscription Agreement (SSA) Pricing City of Monticello Proforma Customer's Customer's Max Offtake from Subscription 0 scion% of Load Counties Load (kWh) CS (kWh) from CS from CS Covered W%Alhi (MWdc) Wriqht 4,903,0924,011,000 4,011,000 • 4,903,092 4,011,000 iii ICustomer's Bill credits from % of bill Payments to Customer's % savings Bill, solar, covered by NRG, net bill, from solar, Pre -solar ($) Year 1 credits Year 1 Post -solar Year 1 r.769 1r•% $389r. $368,030 Net Savings $400,000 - $350,000 - $300,000 - $250,000 $200,000 - $150,000 $100,000 - $50,000 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Years r nrg ® Ch Fixed Rate Inputs 2017 Bill Credit $0.1238 2017 Rate Increase 2.03 2018 Rate Increase 0.00 2019 Rate Increase 1.69 Bill Credit Esc. (2021-204; 1.00 NRG's SSA Esc. Discount to Bill Credit $0.0100 Floor Rate ($/kWh) $0.0950 Assumptions: Annual Solar Degradation 0.50% Term 25 Years I Net 25 -Year Savings $732,383 Rate Table 0.0% $0.1195 1.0% $0.1110 2.5% $0.0970 Net Present Value $718,016 Discount 3.00 Minnesota Community Solar Gardens Solar Subscription Agreement (SSA) Pricing City of Monticello Proforma Customer's Customer's Max Offtake from Subscription 0 scion% of Load Counties Load (kWh) CS (kWh) from CS from CS Covered W%Alhi (MWdc) Wriqht 4,903,0924,011,000 4,011,000 • 4,903,092 4,011,000 iii ICustomer's Bill credits from % of bill Payments to Customer's % savings Bill, solar, covered by NRG, net bill, from solar, Pre -solar ($) Year 1 credits Year 1 Post -solar Year 1 r.769 1r•% $389r. $368,030 Net Savings $400,000 - $350,000 - $300,000 - $250,000 - $200,000 - $150,000 - $100,000 - $50,000 - I I I''' I I I I,�■� ($50,000) - 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 • ($100,000) - Years nrgo Ch Indexed Rate Inputs 2017 Bill Credit $0.1238 2017 Rate Increase 2.03 2018 Rate Increase 0.00 2019 Rate Increase 1.69 Bill Credit Esc. (2021-204; 2.90 NRG's SSA Esc. Discount to Bill Credit $0.0100 Floor Rate ($/kWh) $0.0950 Assumptions: Annual Solar Degradation 0.50% Term 25 Years I Net 25 -Year Savings $944,829 Rate Table 0.0% $0.1195 1.0% $0.1110 2.5% $0.0970 Net Present Value $663,129 Discount 3.00 Minnesota Community Solar Gardens Solar Subscription Agreement (SSA) Pricing City of Monticello Proforma Customer's Customer's Max Offtake from Subscription 0 scion% of Load Counties Load (kWh) CS (kWh) from CS from CS Covered W%Alhi (MWdc) Wriqht 4,903,092 r rrr 4,011,000 • 4,903,092 4,011,000 iii ICustomer's Bill credits from % of bill Payments to Customer's % savings Bill, solar, covered by NRG, net bill, from solar, Pre -solar ($) Year 1 credits Year 1 Post -solar Year 1 r. r Net Savings $400,000 - $350,000 - $300,000 - $250,000 $200,000 - $150,000 $100,000 - $50,000 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Years City Council Agenda: 09/25/2017 4A. Consideration of adopting Ordinance 682 by adding Title 8, Chapter 10- Rights-of- Wav Regulation and Adopting Summary Ordinance 682A for publication (SB/AS/RM) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Currently the City regulates the use of street right of way by reviewing and issuing right of way permits for private utilities (gas, electric, telecommunications) and Fibernet to install these facilities in public rights of way and drainage and utility easements as allowed by state law. A right of way policy adopted by ordinance has not been established yet by the City in conjunction with the right of way permits. A new law, inacted during the 2017 legislative session, allows wireless companies to work with cities to place small cell wireless equipment within public rights of way and on city -owned infrastructure (i.e. street light, power poles, signs, etc.) in the public right of way. The new law also allows cities to enter into collocation agreements (i.e. lease agreements) with the telecommunications provider. In light of this new law, the City attorney is recommending the City adopt a right of way policy by ordinance at this time, in order to regulate the small cell wireless applications that are anticipated to be forthcoming. The City has already received inquiries from telecommunication providers to locate their antennas within the right of way. The current right of way permit form is proposed to be updated to address small cell applications and associated collocations. The policy closely follows the League of MN Cities model policy. The City attorney has modified the policy to include the recent small cell legislation. Below is a summary of the major components of the right of way ordinance: General Right of Wav Ordinance • Provides a means to manage the cities rights-of-way. To date, right of way permit applications have consisted of service drops, underground and overhead mainline utility installations within the boulevard and drainage and utility easements. • Intended to complement the regulatory roles of state and federal agencies, so that the policy fits the specific needs of the City. • Intended to provide for recovery of out-of-pocket and projected costs from persons using the public rights-of-way. • Clarifies that the persons excavating and obstructing the rights-of-way will bear financial responsibility for their work and that they are responsible for protecting and restoring the streets, driveways, sidewalks, trails and boulevards within the rights-of-way and drainage and utility easements. City Council Agenda: 09/25/2017 • Provides enforcement for rights-of-way work completed without a permit. • Provides language for the enforcement of removing abandoned structures at the cost of the facility owner. Small Wireless Facilitv Ordinance: Provides clarity regarding the size and types of antennas, support structures and associated equipment which are allowed in the rights-of-way per state law as follows: o Each antenna shall be located inside an enclosure of no more than 6 cubic feet o All equipment associated with the facility shall be no larger than 28 cubic feet in volume o Each wireless support structure shall not exceed 50 feet above ground level o Each location will require fiber backhaul to collect the data from the antenna. o Each application may include up to 15 different locations. At this time, the fee for small wireless facilities is proposed to be $45, which is the same fee as a main trunk line installation. Staff may propose a revision to this fee after determining actual expenses for processing these permits. • If wireless providers request to locate their antennas on City owned structures (i.e. street lights) they will have to enter into a collocation agreement with the City. The LMC is currently developing a model collocation agreement in which the City will review and modify as necessary. • A collocation application will result in a $1,500 escrow for application review, drafting the collocation agreement and construction inspection. This fee is similar to what other cities are charging and in line with land use application review fees. The law also allows for additional fees as follows: o $150 per year for rent to occupy space on a wireless support structure o $25 per year for maintenance of the wireless support structure o a monthly fee for electricity used to operate the facility, if not purchased directly from the utility, at the rate set forth by statute. • The City is allowed to require a conditional use permit for small wireless facilities and support structures located in the rights-of-way in single-family residential or historical districts. • Below is a summary of the type of right of way permits related to small wireless facilities that the City could receive: City Council Agenda: 09/25/2017 1. Facility collocated on City -owned structures (i.e. street lights, signs). A right of way permit would be required and applicant must enter into a collocation agreement with the City subject to the fees identified in the Fee Schedule. 2. Individual (non -collocated) wireless support structure and facilities located in the right of way. A right of way permit would be required, no collocation agreement required. A conditional use permit would be required if in a residential or historic district. If not located in these districts, only a right of way permit would be required. 3. Individual (non -collocated) wireless support structure and facilities located on private property. A conditional use permit would be required by the current telecommunications ordinance Title 10, Chapter 4, Section 13. 4. Facility collocated on private property (i.e. on power poles, parking lot lights). A conditional use permit would be required by the current telecommunications ordinance Title 10, Chapter 4, Section 13. The Planning Commission will be reviewing the possibility of collocations under a certain height to be a permitted use in order to encourage these facilities to be located on private property and not in the right of way to limit obstructions in the right of way. Al. Budget Impact: The revenue generating by permit fees is anticipated to cover the administration of the permits. However, staff will evaluate these costs after permits are processed. A2. Staff Workload Impact: The City's engineering technician administers the right of way permits totaling approximately 100 plus permits each year. It is unknown how many small wireless facility applications will be received to determine impact. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS 1. Motion to adopting Ordinance 682 by adding Title 8, Chapter 10- Rights -of -Way Regulation and Adopting Summary Ordinance 682A for publication. 2. Motion to deny this request. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff supports Alternative #1. Many cities are creating or amending their right of way policies in light of the new small cell wireless legislation. Given the newness of this issue, amendments to the policy may be presented to the Council in the future. The City attorney recommends adopting a right of way policy at this time. City Council Agenda: 09/25/2017 D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Ordinance 682 B. Summary Ordinance 682A C. Amended Right of Way permit application D. LMC legislative summary memo, August 1, 2017 4 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2017-70 ADOPTION OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO DOWNTOWN SMALL AREA PLAN AS AN AMENDMENT TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR THE CITY OF MONTICELLO WHEREAS, the City of Monticello has, in 2008, adopted a Comprehensive Plan guiding the growth, development, land use, and infrastructure planning for tie City; and WHEREAS, said Comprehensive Plan provides for thede ent and redevelopment of the downtown as a part of such guidance; and WHEREAS, the City last completed a specific planning effort fo ore downtown area in 1997 and 2011; and WHEREAS, the City has found that a revised detailed pl for its do n would be consistent with both City objectives and the purposes of thalprehensive and WHEREAS, as part of updated planning efforts for the dothe City engaged the services of Tangible Solutions to complete a market analysis for the town; and WHEREAS, as part of updated planning efforts for the downtown, the City engaged the services of Cuningham Group to analyze land use and design opportunities in downtown, and A WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello has reviewed the proposed plan for Downtown, the "City of Monticello Downtown Small Area Plan", in joint workshops with the City Council, Parks Commission and Economic Development Authority on May 31St, 2017 and with the Economic, Development Authority on July 12th, 2017; and WHEREAS, the Parks Commission has mmended approval of the City of Monticello Downtown Small Area Plan on March 2o 017; and WHEREAS, the Monticello Economic Development Authority has recommended approval of the City of Monticello Downtown Small Area Plan on August 9th, 2017; and IF WHEREAS, the Planning 646imission of the City of Monticello has held a public hearing on September 5th, 2017 to consider the Downtown Small Area Plan and corresponding amendments, and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered all of the comments and the staff report for the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments and Downtown Small Area Plan, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the need for adoption of an updated downtown plan: 1. The 2017 Downtown Small Area Plan recognizes downtown as a unique commercial district that is the heart of the community and part of Monticello's heritage and identity, and provides a guide for development, redevelopment, and revitalization in downtown Monticello. 2. The Downtown Small Area Plan update was accomplished through engagement and public participation by City, downtown landowners, bu * ess owners, citizens, stakeholders, and policy makers. 3. The Downtown Small Area Plan seeks to retain Broad as Monticello's Main Street, supporting existing businesses, improving connections relationship with the River, and creating new downtown housing opp rtunities along t and Cedar Streets for existing and new Monticello residents. 4. The Downtown Small Area Plan envisio owntown that serves purposes for many people — including dining, recreation, elebrating,„gathering, sh g and living. 5. The updated plan includes an implementation s to further assist in achieving the vision. NOW, THEREFORE,, -BE ITi�ESOLVED, by the cil the City of Monticello, Minnesota: Pursuant to Minn. Stat. 355, the Monticello City Council adopts the amendment to Chapter 3 and Chapter 4 of the Co nsive Plan, includin$the following: 1. The documen ntitled "City of Monti owntown Small Area Plan", dated August 24th, 2017, along with recommendations specified, and with the "Market Context" and "Retail Vitality” studies, which are attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "A" 2. The amendments entitled'Chapter 3 - Land Use" for the existing Comprehensive Plan Chapter 3, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B". 3. The amendments entitled "Chapter 4 —Economic Development" for the existing Comprehensive Plan Chapter 4, which is attached hereto and incorporated as Exhibit «C„ ADOPTED this 25th day of September, 2017, by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. ATTEST: Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator 1 MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Brian Stumpf, Mayor EXHIBIT "B" Attach Final Comprehensive Plan Amendment Text Chapter 3 — Land Use EXHIBIT "B" Attach Final Comprehensive Plan Amendment Text Chapter 4 — Economic Development SUMMARY ORDINANCE NO. 682A CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA A SUMMARY ORDINANCE AMENDING CITY CODE BY ESTABLISHING TITLE 8, CHAPTER 10 — RIGHTS-OF-WAY REGULATION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, on September 25, 2017, Ordinance No. 682 was adopted by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. Due to the lengthy nature of Ordinance No. 682, the following Summary Ordinance No. 682A has been prepared for publication as authorized by state law. The ordinance adopted by the City Council establishes Title 10 of Chapter 8 of the Monticello Zoning Code. The general purpose of this ordinance is to add Chapter 10 which is to administer and regulate the public rights-of-way in the public interest, and to provide for the issuance and regulation of right-of-way permits 8-10: RIGHTS-OF-WAY REGULATION A printed copy of the whole ordinance is available for inspection by any person during the City's regular office hours. The complete ordinance will be posted on the City's website following publication. APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION by the City Council of Monticello, Minnesota, this 25thday of September, 2017 CITY OF MONTICELLO Brian Stumpf, Mayor ATTEST: Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator VOTING IN FAVOR: VOTING IN OPPOSITION: Right Of Way Permit Application CITY OF City of Monticello MiCeno 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1 ontMonticello, MN 55362 ENGINEERING City Hall: 763.295.2711 rowpermit@ci.monticello.mn.us ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM TO ORDINANCE SUB -CONTRACTOR Name of Subcontractor: Contact Person: 24 Hour Contact: Email: Company Name: Address: City: Email: PROJECT LOCATION Street Address/Addition/Location: Phone: Phone: Phone: CONTRACTOR/PROPERTY OWNER Contact Person: Day Phone: State: Zip: 24 Hour Phone: For Office use only Date: Permit No: ❑ Main Trunk Line* ❑ Commercial Service Drop* ❑ Residential Service Drop** *Attach detailed drawing(s) of the project area including existing & proposed right-of-way and easements, street, curb, sidewalk, trails, above & below ground facilities or appurtenances, poles, or obstructions to be installed including size & depth of excavation. **Attach list of addresses or detailed drawing(s) if residential drop(s) originate more than 10 feet from property to be served. TYPE OF PERMIT ❑ Obstruction ❑ Excavation ❑ Small Wireless Facility Other (specify) Contact Gopher State One Call 48 hours prior to commencing work in accordance with their rules. Small wireless facility permits must include a structural study signed by P.E., a design plan/route for fiber backhaul signed by P.E., demonstrate FCC compliance, and a copy of permit from pole owner if owned by an agency other than the City of Monticello. TYPE OF UTILITY ❑ Cable TV ❑ Electric ❑ Gas ❑ Telecommunications ❑ Street Light NATURE OF WORK ❑ Replacement ❑ Other (specify) ❑ Repair ❑ New ❑ Other (specify) TYPE OF SURFACE TO BE DISTURBED ❑ Bituminous ❑ Concrete ❑ Gravel ❑ Other (specify) MATERIAL USED/METHOD OF INSTALLATION Type of pipe, conduit, or cable: Voltage or Pressure: Length: Distance from curb or centerline: ❑ Trench ❑ Plow ❑ Other (specify) ❑ Abandon ❑ Trail (bit) ❑ Underground ❑ Aerial ❑ Sidewalk (conc) I ❑ Boulevard Size: Depth from Surface: ❑ Directional Bore ❑ Backhoe ❑ Hand Dig 1 8/28/2017 COLLOCATION Will Facility be collocated: ❑ Yes ❑ No Collocated Facilities will require a separate Collocation Agreement. Please attach map of proposed collocation sites. CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE Number of Construction Days: Start Date: Permit is valid for 6 months from the above start date. A permit extension from the Engineering Department is required if work will not be completed within 6 months. Will detouring of traffic be necessary? (Traffic control must comply with MMUTCD) o Yes ❑ No If yes, attach detour map and list duration of detour: days/weeks The City Engineer shall be notified in writing at least 5 working days prior to detour being established, changed, or discontinued. RESTORATION PLANNED I ❑ Bituminous Paving ❑ Motorized Tamper (Compaction) ❑ Machine Formed Curb ❑ Hand Formed Curb or Sidewalk ❑ Sodding w/4" topsoil ❑ Seeding w/4" topsoil (includes Mulching or blanketing) ❑ Sidewalk (concrete) ❑ Trail (bit) ❑ Other (specify) Note: All work must be restored with suitable materials and compacted according to the City of Monticello's Construction Specifications. Permanent restoration is required within 10 working days; additional permits may be withheld until restoration is completed. Right -Of -Way Permit Fees Street Hole Pavement Hole Fee (>8" diameter) $55.00 Base Fee (1st 100') — Trench or Boring $45.00 Main Trunk Line Trenching (over 100') Additional linear feet x $.10 Boring (over 100') Additional linear feet x $.05 Residential: Fee with drawings (25 addresses max per application) Service $30.00 Drops Commercial: Fee with drawing(s) (5 drawings max per application) $30.00 Permit Extension Fee (14 days maximum) $20.00 Obstruction Fee (Equipment, Signs, Trees, etc.) $45.00 Small Wireless Facility Fee $45.00 Estimated Total Due: The undersigned agrees to carry at least a $2,000 bond with the City of Monticello, $100,000 of Workers comp insurance, $2,000,000 in Liability insurance. The undersigned herewith accepts the terms and conditions of this permit by the City of Monticello as herein contained and agrees to fully comply therewith to the satisfaction of the City of Monticello. The undersigned also declares that he/she will comply with all relevant City Ordinances and all Right of Way Regulations. Permit processing may take up to 3 business days for excavation and obstruction permits. Permit processing may take up to 90 days for small wireless facilities permits. Applicant's Signature: Printed Name: Title: (For Office Use Only) Does the subcontractor have a $2000 bond with the City of Monticello? Does the subcontractor have $100,000 Worker's Comp Insurance? Does the subcontractor have $2,000,000 Liability Insurance? 2 Date: ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No 8/28/2017 O LEAGUE of CONNECTING & INNOVATING MINNESOTA SINCE 1913 CITIES 2017 Telecommunications Right -of -Way User Amendments Permitting Process for Small Wireless Facilities Publication Date: August 1, 2017 (For information on related federal laws see LMC Information Memo "Cell Towers, Small Cell Technologies, and Distributed Antenna Svstems") Introduction: On May 30, 2017, Gov. Dayton signed into law a bill' amending Minnesota's Telecommunications Right - of -Way User Law2. The amendments cleared up any confusion about whether wireless providers are treated the same as other telecommunications right-of-way users under state law, but created a separate, streamlined permitting system for placement of small wireless facilities on city -owned structures in rights of way. Most of the bill provisions became effective on May 31, 2017, with the exception that the prohibition on moratoria does not take effect until January 1, 2018 for those cities that did not have a right- of-way ordinance in place on or before May 18, 2017, to give those cities an opportunity to enact an ordinance regulating their public rights-of-way. Also, the amendments allow cities to enter collocation agreements with telecommunications right-of-way users, if they choose, as long as the collocation agreement for small wireless facilities is made available in a substantially complete form no later than six months after the effective date of this act or three months after receiving a small wireless facility permit application from a wireless service provider. Where can I read the new law? Until revisions of the state statute occur to include bills passed this session, cities can find the amendments at 2017 Laws, Chapter 94. Does the law require cities to do anything differently when regulating wireless providers attaching their equipment to city structures in the rights of way? Yes, the amendments create a separate permit process for small wireless facilities. The below checklist was prepared to serve as a guide for cities to use when amending existing telecommunications ordinances, but does necessarily cover all nuances of the new law and should not replace working with city attorneys to draft or amend existing ordinances. What is the purpose of Minnesota's Telecommunication Right -of -Way User Law? 1 Chapter 94, Article 9 of the 2017 Regular Session, effective May 31, 2017. Z Minn. Stat. §§ 237.162, 237.163. LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 14S UNIVERSITY AVE. WEST PHONE: (651) 281-1200 FAx (651) 281-1298 INSURANCE TRUST ST. PAUL, MN SS103-2044 TOLL FREE: (800) 925-1122 WEB: WWW.LMC.ORG In 1997, the Minnesota Legislature recognized the need for a state law providing local government units with the authority to regulate the use of public rights of way by telecommunications right-of-way users. The resulting Minnesota Telecommunications Right -of -Way User Law allows telecommunications right-of-way users to construct, maintain, and operate conduit, cable, switches (and now small wireless facilities), and related appurtenances and facilities along, across, upon, above, and under any public right of way, but subjects those users to local regulations by cities to manage their rights of way and to recover management costs. Can a city manage its right of way without doing anything? No, the city must adopt an enabling ordinance. A local government unit is not required to manage its rights of way, but most want to do so. As such, the local government authority must pass an ordinance exercising this authority. Many cities find that having a separate telecommunications right-of-way user ordinance (in addition to a general right-of-way ordinance) allows for better regulation of cell towers, small cell and other telecommunications equipment. Did the amendments in the 2017 laws impact all telecommunications right-of-way users? Some of the amendments impacted cities' regulations on all telecommunications right-of-way users, but the amendments also created a distinct set of regulations specifically for placement of small wireless facilities. With respect to the regulations that apply to all telecommunications right-of-way users, the law: ✓ Requires all telecommunications right-of-way users seeking to excavate or obstruct a public right of way to obtain a right-of-way permit to do so. ✓ Requires a telecommunications right-of-way user using, occupying, or seeking to use or occupy a public right of way for providing telecommunications services to register with the local government unit by providing the local government unit with specific information (set forth in the statute), and including authorization for periodic updates. ✓ Requires telecommunications right-of-way users to submit plans for construction and major maintenance, to provide reasonable notice of projects that may require excavation and obstruction of public rights of way. ✓ Provides for restoration by the telecommunication right-of-way user after excavation occurs, either in the form of doing the restoration work or reimbursing the local governmental unit for the cost of the restoration work. ✓ Allows recovery of right-of-way management costs through a fee for registration, a fee for each right- of-way permit or, when appropriate, a fee applicable to a telecommunications right-of-way user when that user causes the local government unit to incur costs because of actions or inactions of that user. Can a city charge a fee for using the right of way? Yes, because when cities manage rights of way, they incur costs. However, when cities charge right-of-way users, the fees must be calculated on a competitively neutral basis, and based on the actual costs incurred by the city in managing the public right of way. A fee for the cost of managing the right-of-way should reflect an allocation among all users of the public right-of-way, including the city itself. Can a city charge rent if a right-of-way user places equipment in the right of way? Yes. Nothing in the law prohibits a city from charging rent for the placement of technology or equipment by a telecommunications right-of-way user on a city owned structure. However, cities are limited in the amount 2 of rent they can charge for collocation of small wireless facilities on city -owned structures. Fee limitations are described in the statute. If a city does not have an ordinance, can it pass a moratorium on processing any applications it receives until it can pass an ordinance? Probably not. The law prohibits cities from establishing a moratorium with respect to filing, receiving, or processing applications for right-of-way or small wireless facility permits, or for issuing or approving right- of-way or small wireless facility permits. However, for cities that did not have an ordinance enabling it to manage its right-of-way before or on May 18, 2017, the prohibition on moratoria does not take effect until January 1, 2018, giving those cities an opportunity to enact an ordinance regulating its public rights-of-way. Can a city still deny applications for siting of telecommunications equipment in its right of way? Generally, yes, however, any denial or revocation of either a right-of-way permit or a small wireless facility permit must be done in writing and must document the basis for the denial, including the health, safety and welfare reasons for the denial. The local government unit must notify the telecommunications right-of-way user, in writing, within three business days of the decision to deny or revoke a permit. If the city denies a permit application, the telecommunications right-of-way user may cure the deficiencies identified by the local government unit and resubmit its application. If the telecommunications right-of-way user resubmits the application within 30 days of receiving written notice of the denial, the city may not charge an additional filing or processing fee. The local government unit must approve or deny the revised application within 30 days after the submission of the revised application, or it is deemed granted. Can cities treat the siting of all cell equipment the same? It depends. If the city plans to regulate cell sitings and require telecommunications right-of-way users to get permits, then the 2017 amendments to the law create a separate permit system for small wireless facility technology that places additional limitations on a city's ability to regulate those specific types of technology. Does the new law mean our city cannot enter into a separate agreement with telecommunications right- of-way users who want to place equipment on city owned structures? The amendments do not require cities to have separate agreements, and some cities may choose to put these provisions in their ordinance or permit instead. For cities that want a separate `collocation agreement' in place, they must develop and make that collocation agreement available no later than six months after May 31, 2017 (the effective date of the act) or three months after receiving a small wireless facility permit application from a wireless service provider. "Collocate" or "collocation" means to install, mount, maintain, modify, operate, or replace a small wireless facility on, under, within, or adjacent to an existing wireless support structure that is owned privately or by a local government unit. The template of the agreement must be made available in a substantially complete form. The parties to the separate small wireless facility collocation agreement always may incorporate additional mutually agreed upon terms and conditions. Also, the law now clearly classifies any small wireless facility collocation agreement between a local government unit and a wireless service provider as public data accessible to the public under Minnesota's Data Practices Law. 3 What type of equipment is subject to the special requirements on small cell technology? The statute defines type of equipment, which include: "Small wireless facility": (1) A wireless facility that meets both following qualifications: (i) Each antenna is located inside an enclosure of no more than six cubic feet in volume or, in the case of an antenna that has exposed elements, the antenna and all its exposed elements could fit within an enclosure of no more than six cubic feet. (ii) All other wireless equipment associated with the small wireless facility, excluding electric meters, concealment elements, telecommunications demarcation boxes, battery backup power systems, grounding equipment, power transfer switches, cutoff switches, cable, conduit, vertical cable runs for the connection of power and other services, and any equipment concealed from public view within or behind an existing structure or concealment, is in aggregate no more than 28 cubic feet in volume. (2) A micro wireless facility. "Wireless support structure" means a new or existing structure in a public right of way designed to support or capable of supporting small wireless facilities, as reasonably determined by a local government unit. "Collocate" or "collocation" means to install, mount, maintain, modify, operate, or replace a small wireless facility on, under, within, or adjacent to an existing wireless support structure that is owned privately or by a local government unit. What additional requirements must cities consider to comply with Minnesota's Telecommunications Right -of -Way User Law, as amended? The law sets forth specific requirements related to placement of small wireless facilities or installation of new wireless support structures. The below information highlights items cities will want to consider when drafting an ordinance or amending an existing ordinance. Again, cities should work with their city attorneys to ensure full compliance with the law. NEW STATE LAW REQUIREMENTS GOVERNING PLACEMENT OF SMALL WIRELESS FACILITIES IN RIGHTS OF WAY If a city decides to regulate or require permits for placement of a new wireless support structure or collocation of a small wireless facility, then the city should be aware that: ❑ Small wireless facilities and wireless support structures are a permitted use, except that in districts zoned as single-family residential use or district identified as historic (either by federal law or ordinance), a local government unit can require a conditional use permit. 4 ❑ Cities must not require an applicant for a small wireless facility permit to provide any information that the applicant previously had provided to the city in a different application for a small wireless permit (which the applicant must identify by specific reference number). ❑ Cities must not require an application to provide information that is not reasonably necessary to review a permit application for compliance with generally applicable and reasonable health, safety, and welfare regulations, or to demonstrate compliance with applicable Federal Communications Commission regulations governing radio frequency exposure, or other information required by this section. ❑ Permits for small cell facility collocation or placement of a new wireless support structure must specify that the term of a small wireless facility permit equals the length of time that small wireless facility is in use, unless the permit is revoked under this section. ❑ The total application fee for a small wireless facility permit must comply with the statutory requirement regarding costs related to the permit. ❑ The city must allow applicants for small wireless facility permits to file a consolidated permit application to collocate up to 15 small wireless facilities (or a greater number if agreed to by a local government unit), provided that all the small wireless facilities in the application are located within a two-mile radius, consist of substantially similar equipment, and are to be placed on similar types of wireless support structures. ❑ The city has 90 days after the date a small wireless facility permit application is filed to issue or deny the permit, or the permit is automatically issued. ❑ To toll the 90-day clock, the city must provide a written notice of incompleteness to the applicant within 30 days of receipt of the application, identifying all missing documents or information, and providing the applicant with a time to cure that complies with the statute'. ❑ If the city receives applications within a single seven-day period from one or more applicants seeking approval of permits for more than 30 small wireless facilities, the city may extend the 90-day deadline by an additional 30 days. If a city elects to invoke this extension, it must inform in writing any applicant to whom the extension will be applied. ❑ A city cannot require placement of small wireless facilities on any specific wireless support structure other than the one proposed in the permit application. ❑ A city must not limit the placement of small wireless facilities, either by minimum separation distances between small wireless facilities or maximum height limitations, except that each wireless support structure installed in the right of way after the effective date of this act shall not exceed 50 feet above ground level (unless the local government unit agrees to a greater height). 'Minn. Stat. §237.163, Subd. R(b). 5 ❑ A city can set forth in its ordinance separation requirements for placement of wireless support structures in relation to other wireless support structures. ❑ A city still may deny permit for health, safety, and welfare reasons or for noncompliance with decorative wireless support structures or signs. ❑ A city cannot require a person to pay a small wireless facility permit fee, obtain a small wireless facility permit, or enter into a small wireless facility collocation agreement solely in order to conduct routine maintenance of a small wireless facility; replace a small wireless facility with a new facility that is substantially similar or smaller in size, weight, height, and wind or structural loading; or install, place, maintain, operate, or replace micro wireless facilities suspended on cables strung between existing utility poles in compliance with national safety codes. ❑ A city cannot require an applicant to apply for or enter any individual license, franchise, or other agreement with the local government unit or any other entity, other than the optional standard small wireless facility collocation agreement. ❑ A city may require notice of any work that will obstruct a public right of way. OPTIONAL PROVISIONS FOR SMALL WIRELESS FACILITIES ❑ A city is not required to have a separate agreement, but can choose to enter collocation agreements with applicants locating small wireless facilities onto city owned structures to address terms and conditions of the use of the structures. If a city chooses to do so, then it must make the agreement available to the public in a substantially complete format no later than six months after the effective date or three months after receiving a small wireless facility permit application from a wireless service provider. ❑ A city may elect to charge each small wireless facility attached to a wireless support structure owned by the local government unit a fee (rental fee), in addition to other fees or charges allowed under the law, consisting of. (1) up to $150 per year for rent to occupy space on a wireless support structure; (2) up to $25 per year for maintenance associated with the space occupied on a wireless support structure; and (3) an additional monthly fee for electricity used to operate a small wireless facility, if not purchased directly from a utility, at the rate set forth in the statute.' ' Minn. Stat. 237.163, Subd. 6 (d). 2 City Council Agenda — 09/25/2017 4B. Consideration of a request for Amendment to Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development, Development Stage Planned Unit Development, and Preliminary Plat for Carlisle Village 6th Addition for single familv lots in an R-2 (Single Familv and Two Familv Residential) District Applicant: Paxmar, LLC (NAC) Property: Legal: Carlisle Village 2nd Addition, Outlot C, and Lots 1-5, Block 1; Lots 1-3, Block 2; Lots 1-4, Block 3; and Lots 1-5, Block 5. Address: 56xx Gateway Circle and Bakken Street Planning Case Number: 2017-012 A. REFERENCE & BACKGROUND Request(s): Development Stage PUD Amendment and Preliminary Plat to convert 17 attached townhouse lots into 14 detached townhouse lots. Deadline for Decision: October 14, 2017 Land Use Designation: Places to Live Zoning Designation: R-2, Single and Two Family Residential The purpose of the "R-2" single and two-family residential district is to provide for low to moderate density one and two -unit dwellings and directly related complementary uses. Overlays/Environmental Regulations Applicable: NA Current Site Use: Vacant Surrounding Land Uses: North: R-1, Single Family East: Vacant/Rural South: R -A, Single Family (Carlisle Village) West: T -N, Single Family (Carlisle Village) Project Description: The development site includes previously platted lands which were originally planned to be developed as attached townhouse units. Much of the original townhome area was never final platted into lots and blocks and remains an outlot. On the 25 attached City Council Agenda — 09/25/2017 townhouse lots that were final platted, only 8 units were constructed. The applicant seeks to convert the remaining 17 platted attached lots to accommodate single family detached townhouse lots, including replatting a portion of the outlots that were set aside as common area. The applicant is not proposing development for the remainder of the unplatted area at this time (Carlisle Village 2nd Addition Outlot A). ANALYSIS Planned Unit Development. The Planning Commission and City Council met for a Concept Review of the proposal earlier this summer. The primary comments from that review consisted of some concern over the transition between the T -N Single Family neighborhood to the west, and more particularly, the compatibility with the 8 units of attached townhouses built as a part of the initial phase of development in the 2nd Addition. As a part of the PUD Concept Review, the following items were highlighted for discussion. Staff has added comments related to each item: a. Note that the conversion of the lots of Blocks 3 and 5 sit within the underlying common property belonging to the existing Villas on Gateway Homeowners Association rather than Paxmar/Carlisle Village, LLC, requiring cooperation in subsequent applications, and eventual inclusion of any changed units into the Association, since the driveways to each unit lie within common property. At this stage, the Association is not participating in the request for Concept review. The applicant suggests that they are open to either joining the current association, or creating a new separate association for the detached portion of the project. The Plat appears to be drawn with an expectation that the existing attached and proposed detached units would be joined, since the Outlots surrounding the attached units remain unsubdivided. If the applicants proposed to establish a separate association, the common area outlots should be separated, with the relevant portions conveyed from the Villas on Gateway association to the new development, since the common areas would need to be controlled by separate ownership and management. The existing association would participate in that process for subdivision. b. Change in land use from attached to detached units. Most of the comments at the Concept Review meeting suggested a willingness to accept the change in unit style. The Carlisle Village project was originally designed to accommodate a mix of unit styles — large lot single family, smaller 2 City Council Agenda — 09/25/2017 lot single family (now the T -N zoning area), and attached townhouse units. The applicant suggest that the attached units are not an attractive product, and have proposed an alternative detached townhouse design, further diversifying the residential mix. The proposed detached units are less dense than the attached townhouses, but more dense than the adjoining T -N neighborhood. The T -N area consists generally of lot sizes of 6,600 square feet and 55 foot lot widths, with 6 foot side setbacks. Front setbacks are in the range of 20 to 25 feet from the lot line, approximately 35 to 40 feet from the curb. The proposed detached units would sit on parcels of approximately 2,500 square feet, but with common area that results in an average density of one unit per 5,800 square feet. The applicant is proposing side building separation of 10 feet (5 foot setbacks from the new lot lines) and 20 foot setbacks to the property line, resulting in about 35 feet from the curb line of the public street. Staff would recommend that 6 foot side yards, and 25 foot front yards to the face of the garage be required to accommodate typical side - yard drainage and utility easements between buildings, and avoid vehicles parked in driveways from extending into the public right of way. c. Acceptability of mixing existing attached units with new, architecturally distinct detached units side by side. The applicants suggest that the detached units will employ a higher level of architectural finish and be more marketable that the existing attached units. However, the City has expressed a concern that the existing units not be isolated as an incompatible use. Efforts to integrate this portion of the project may include similar front building detailing, including similar siding, garage door, and wainscot brick colors, as well as the tapered post supports used in the attached unit architecture. By integrating these details into the units adjoining the attached buildings, the introduction of the detached units would be more compatible. The applicants should also detail corner -lot unit styles. d. Issues related to development of the remainder of the originally planned project in a consistent manner. The applicant has not indicated how the remainder of the unplatted area would be developed, other than to suggest that market conditions will play a part in any proposal brought forward to the City. It may be assumed that compatibility and integration of the existing developments will play apart in the City's review of those areas. e. Reduction in overall density from 17 units to 14 units over an area of approximately 2 acres of buildable area excluding right of way. 3 City Council Agenda — 09/25/2017 No concerns related to density were raised. The resulting density would decrease from the approved 9 units per net acre to about 7.5 units per net acre. f. Occupancy of the lots by smaller single family detached units, generally narrower than commonly available on wider lots, with the majority of the building front occupied by garage. This note relates to how these detached units may compare to those in the area along Gateway Drive — originally zoned as "R -2A" under the previous zoning ordinance. This note would also relate to how the detached units compare to the previously approved and developed attached units. The T -N neighborhood includes buildings of approximately 43 feet in width, with (mostly) 2 -car garage door fronts. The existing attached townhouses are approximately 26 feet in width, also with 2 -car garage fronts. The proposed detached townhouse units are also mostly 26 feet in width, with 2 -car garages, although the applicants show an optional 3 -car garage model on two of the lots. g. Architectural compatibility of the proposed units with the intent of the PUD, and of the Carlisle Village concept as a "step-up" residential neighborhood. As noted, the applicants contend that the proposed detached units are of greater marketability and value that the attached model. As noted above, efforts to integrate the attached and detached neighboring buildings would facilitate an appropriate transition. Revised drawings which detail this adjustment is a condition of approval moving forward to final stage consideration. h. Small individual lots relying on common maintenance for driveways and access to the public street (Gateway Circle for 11 of the units, Bakken Street for 3 units). The proposed detached units are proposed to have common maintenance on driveways and landscaping, but would rely on private maintenance of side yards and exterior building materials (attached units share exterior building maintenance as a common expense, and have no interior side yards). Again, the applicant needs to clearly detail and define association relationships and regulation with their future application. i. Address Engineering concerns including: 1. Water service disconnections will be required if existing water services are not utilized. 2. Wetland Conservation Act documentation for a no loss determination has been approved for the created wetlands on the site. M City Council Agenda — 09/25/2017 3. Review of stormwater management requirements will be evaluated with the plan submittal to determine if the existing pond adjacent to the development meets City and MPCA's current requirements. The City Engineer has provided PUD and Plat comments in a separate letter dated August 25, 2017. These comments are incorporated by reference. j. Other issues raised by staff or city officials. In addition to the comments above, staff notes that the applicant has provided a landscaping plan which provides only common area tree planting, a total of 19 overstory deciduous trees, and 10 evergreen trees — a total of 29 trees for the proposed 14 units. However, no private site landscaping is included with the proposal. For townhouse units, individual building and/or site landscaping should be included for review. By contrast, the T -N district single family homes have extensive front yard landscaping requirements. Acknowledging the smaller front yards, the applicants must nonetheless include individual unit landscaping as a component of an attractive "step-up" development. Preliminary Plat. The proposed plat, as noted above, replats the various attached townhouse parcels (along with a portion of an outlot) into detached townhouse parcels, reducing overall density from 17 units to 14 units. The applicants do not propose to impact the outlots for 13 of the 14 units. The 14th unit, fronting on Bakken Street, would be taken from the existing Outlot C, reducing the overall common area in that location. As noted earlier, the proposed configuration raises concerns related to association relationship. If the applicants propose to create a separate association (which may be important since the two -unit styles have separate association responsibilities), the applicants should work with the Villas on Gateway association to replat Outlots D and B to convey the common area around the existing attached units to the new units. In the alternative, the applicants should show — as a part of their applications for final plat and final PUD, that they have signed an agreement to merge the existing association with the new development and provide for management detail in association documents. It should be noted that Mr. Roessler has previously stated to City staff that there is an existing easement for access from the HOA for these lots. In addition, the plat should include drainage and utility easements between buildings of at least 6 feet on either side of each lot line. This may impact the replatting of the underlying and/or surrounding outlots, or an adjustment in the units or lot configurations. 5 City Council Agenda — 09/25/2017 Planning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission reviewed these requests on September 5th, 2017 and held a public hearing on the requested amendment to CUP and preliminary plat. In the Commission's discussion regarding the staff report, Commissioner Fyle confirmed that the street fronting the proposed units is a public street. The Commission further inquired about the Exhibit Z condition relating to the association formation. Planner Steve Grittman noted that townhomes can have varying configurations. It is common for a piece of private property to sit within a larger common area. In terms of maintenance, the association documents would need to address maintenance for buildings, lots and common areas and are dependent on the association to enforce. Members of the public were present to address the Commission. The developer/applicant, Alan Roessler of Paxmar, LLC addressed the Commission. Mr. Roessler addressed the association condition listed in Exhibit Z. He indicated that Paxmar would ask that the condition be revised to be contingent on City staff approval of association documentation prior to final stage PUD. He stated their preference is to join the existing HOA. The issue is that the time to join the existing HOA has passed, and the HOA will need to vote to allow these new units into the existing association. Mr. Roessler stated that the condition requiring that in the alternative the common area be split would not be possible due to ownership. Mr. Roessler commented that the 5' sideyard and 20' front yard setback are proposed in order to allow decks on the units. Block 3 requires the 20' setback in order to allow the decks on those units backing up to Gatewater Drive. He stated that the existing townhome units are setback at 22', which they would be willing to meet for the new units and then reduce the deck length. He also noted that they can meet the 6' setback and would therefore request a 6' sideyard setback and 22' front yard setback. Mr. Grittman clarified that with a 25' required setback, the total distance from curb would be about 30' for driveways. Commissioner Murdoff inquired about the association condition in Exhibit Z and the Commission's ability to review the association structure prior to approval. City staff stated that the applicant has been put on notice via this condition that the association items must be resolved prior to final stage submittal for application. Mr. Grittman noted that the applicant at this time is seeking to understand whether the land use arrangement is acceptable and then will work through the alternatives for the association. Angela Schumann stated that the Commission could also provide direction to the applicant at this point in terms of maintenance and other common elements to help the applicant prepare the required association documents. Mr. Roessler responded that it is their intent for the HOA to handle all maintenance for the exterior of the property in terms of snow removal and landscaping. The association would also have architectural control and maintenance remedy for exterior of the homes themselves. Jacob Erickson, 6442 84th Street Northeast, spoke to the Commission. He stated some concern about the decks being too close to the sidewalk. It was noted by staff that the decks n City Council Agenda — 09/25/2017 will be within the individual unit lot area, and will not encroach on the sidewalk area, approximately 20' away. Mr. Erickson also noted concerns with 5' spacing between the individual units and the garage -forward design. Lloyd Hilgart, resident at 6413 82nd Street, addressed the Commission. Mr. Hilgart stated his support for the 6' sideyard setback. He also expressed concern with the proposed front yard setback, noting that meeting a 25' setback would allow more parking within the drive area. He also noted that there is no information on the plan for the balance of the outlot area, including areas for visitor parking. Mr. Hilgart also stated concern regarding the two units which access Bakken Street, which could present traffic conflicts, particularly at the intersection. His preference was also to require decks, which may require an allowance for 22' front yard setback, as well as a required variation in design style for the homes. Kara Moore, 8635 Gatewater Drive, stated that she was also concerned about the unit fronting Bakken Street. She explained that this is a change from the original plat, in which all the units accessed and fronted on Gateway Circle. She noted that adding this unit takes area away from the space within the outlot common area. She stated she would also support additional landscaping for the units. Jon Morphew, 8586 Gatewater Drive, addressed the Commission. He stated his preference for requiring the decks with the initial construction if the reduced setback is allowed. Mr. Roessler explained that if the City is open to the proposed concept, their intent is to continue this development style on the balance of the outlot. He clarified that their intent is not to replicate the design on Gatewater, but to break apart the attached product. The Commission's discussion included those concerns raised during the public hearing, including those conditions in Exhibit Z. Commissioner Murdoff expressed concerns with the items addressed during the hearing, including the unit setback and design and association documents. Commissioner Peterson stated concern with the design transition in terms of both the existing townhomes and those on Gatewater Drive. After discussion on the comments and analysis, the Commission voted 3-2 to approve the decisions for Development Stage PUD Approval and Preliminary Plat. Commissioners Murdoff and Peterson voted in dissent. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS The Planning Commission recommends Alternative #1 below. Decision 1: Consideration of Amendment to Conditional Use Permit for PUD and Development Stage PUD approval: 7 City Council Agenda — 09/25/2017 Motion to adopt Resolution 2017-72 to approve the amendment to CUP for PUD Development Stage for the proposed Carlisle Village 6th Addition, converting 17 attached townhouse lots to 14 detached townhouse lots, subject to the conditions identified in Exhibit Z as identified by the Planninfz Commission. 2. Motion to adopt Resolution 2017-72 to approve the amendment to CUP for PUD Development Stage for the proposed Carlisle Village 6th Addition, converting 17 attached townhouse lots to 14 detached townhouse lots, subject to the conditions identified in Exhibit Z as prepared by City staff. 3. Motion to adopt Resolution 2017-72 to approve the amendment to CUP for PUD Development Stage for the proposed Carlisle Village 6th Addition, converting 17 attached townhouse lots to 14 detached townhouse lots, subject to the conditions identified in Exhibit Z as identified by the City Council. 4. Motion to deny adoption of Resolution No. 2017-72, based on findings to be identified by the City Council. 5. Motion to table action, pending submission of additional materials. Decision 2: Consideration of Preliminary Plat approval: The Planning Commission recommends Alternative #1 below. 1. Motion to adopt Resolution No. 2017-73, approving the Preliminary Plat for Carlisle Village 6th Addition, subject to the conditions identified in Exhibit Z, as identified by the Planning Commission. 2. Motion to adopt Resolution No. 2017-73 approving the Preliminary Plat for Carlisle Village 6th Addition, subject to the conditions identified in Exhibit Z, as identified by City staff. 3. Motion to adopt Resolution No. 2017-73, recommending approval of the Preliminary Plat for Carlisle Village 6th Addition, subject to the conditions identified in Exhibit Z, as identified by the City Council. 4. Motion to deny adoption of Resolution No. 2017-73, based on findings to be identified at the public hearing. Motion to table action on the resolution, pending submission of additional materials. City Council Agenda — 09/25/2017 C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff has prepared an Exhibit Z which illustrates the Planning Commission's recommendation for decision, as well as the original Exhibit Z recommended by staff. Given the discussion and public comment at the Planning Commission meeting, the City Council may wish to address the items referenced during the hearing and Commission discussion, resulting in an alternate Exhibit Z. To assist the Council in their review, the following are items noted in the public hearing and the Commission's discussion. Homeowner's Association: Require the applicant to clarify the relationship to the existing association and any new association and require detail from the applicant on common area maintenance and private property owner responsibility in the form of proposed Association documents and bylaws.. Setback: Address setback for both sideyard and front yard. Planning Commission voted to approve a 5' sideyard setback and 22' front yard setback. Staff's Exhibit Z condition required 6' sideyard and 25' front yard setback. It is presumed that under either option, all buildings and/or decks would maintain at least a 20' rear setback from adjoining property or public right of way. Design: The recommendation listed in Exhibit Z for incorporation of elements from existing townhomes, as well as concerns with side yard entry design were discussed. Incorporation of design elements from the R -2A was also discussed during the public hearing. Units facing Bakken Street: Discussion on design of the units accessing Bakken Street, loss of common open space, and potential traffic conflict concerns were noted. Council should consider whether the units should be removed from the open space area nearest to Gatewater Drive, accesses reconfigured and/or the landscaping buffer should be intensified. Decks: The Commission discussed whether decks should be required; ultimately the Commission's vote did not require the decks. Landscaping: The Commission approved Exhibit Z with the condition that a plan for individual unit landscaping be provided. During the hearing, additional buffering or landscaping in rear yards along Gateway Drive and for the units themselves was addressed. Particular discussion may be warranted for additional landscaping/buffering where a new building is proposed for the open space at the corner of Gatewater Drive and Gateway Circle. E City Council Agenda — 09/25/2017 Staff recommends approval of the amendment and plat, with the items noted in Exhibit Z of this report. However, Council may wish to address the items noted in the Planning Commission hearing as part of the final Exhibit Z. As discussed, the introduction of the detached townhouse unit style is not out of character with the Carlisle Village PUD concept, which calls for a variety of housing styles. However, there are details to address to meet the intent of the district, and to acknowledge the existing development, into which the new units should be integrated. Issues related to architecture, building separation, landscaping, and engineering are important to ensure a reasonable transition in this area, particularly given the existence of the few attached units built as a part of the original project. D. SUPPORTING DATA A. Resolution 2017-72, Development Stage PUD B. Resolution 2017-73 Preliminary Plat C. Site Aerial D. Applicant Narrative E. Plan Set, including: a. Cover Sheet b. Existing Conditions c. Preliminary Plat & Site Plan d. Grading Plan e. Utility Service Plan f. Details g. Landscape Plan F. Elevations G. City Engineer's Letter, dated August 28, 2017 H. Letter of Petition Z. Conditions of Approval 10 City Council Agenda - 09/25/2017 EXHIBIT Z Carlisle Village 611 Addition PUD Amendment/Development Stage PUD And Preliminary Plat Carlisle Village 2nd Addition, Outlot C, and Lots 1-5, Block 1; Lots 1-3, Block 2; Lots 1-4, Block 3; and Lots 1-5, Block 5. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION 1. Tho Plat aho l,d be redesigned to s ,-„to the eemmen o outlets between the eking attached and proposed ,dot l,ed units to -alley sopamtion of the associations, •f sem— a• would ;pat Oudot B a Oudot D; The 1 t irircE�`' TC�izcri rr=w'-vuicrn vc-vrr raicmrc��u rv--vrzixc-civcmc must p ;ado .d..ettme„tatio ela4in . to ; elusi ,,, of the proposed ,,,its into the e a~>t amosiation. The applicants must show — either by design and conveyance of land to a new association which they control, or by formal agreement between the current association and the new plat — that the applicant's new units will have access rights across the common area of the outlots to the public street. Eithe The final alternative must be completed as a part of the application for Final Plat and Final PUD and to the s tisf etio efbe approved by -the City Attorney. 2. The detached units should be designed to meet a 6 5 foot side yard setbacks and 25 22 foot front yard setbacks to accommodate standard internal lot line easements and parking use of the front driveway areas. 3. The units adjacent to the existing attached buildings should be designed for submittal of Final Stage PUD documents to incorporate similar materials and colors, including siding, brick, and post design as noted. The unit designs, and designs that are similar in size and fagade detail to those proposed shall be the exclusive architecture used in the project, unless an appropriate amendment or adjustment is proposed and approved per the requirements of the PUD zoning regulations. 4. Prepare final Homeowners Association documents meeting the intent of the City and satisfying any concerns of the City Attorney relating to common maintenance and enforcement. As noted in item 1, above, the documents should reflect the clear right of the units proposed by the applicant to cross the common area to the public street. 5. Enforcement of Homeowners Association maintenance requirements shall not be enforced by the City of Monticello, but documents may not be amended without City approval via PUD Amendment until the Association has been turned over to individual homeowners from the control of the developer. 6. Add landscape plantings, including shrubs and perennials, to the private lot improvements for each detached unit, as illustrated in the accompanying building illustrations. 11 City Council Agenda — 09/25/2017 7. The plat lies along Jason Avenue, CSAH 18, and requires the review of Wright County for comment. 8. Comply with the requirements of the City Engineer's letter of August 25, 2017. 9. Comments of other City staff or those of the Planning Commission. EXHIBIT Z Carlisle Village 6` Addition PUD Amendment/Development Stage PUD And Preliminary Plat Carlisle Village 211 Addition, Outlot C, and Lots 1-5, Block 1; Lots 1-3, Block 2; Lots 1-4, Block 3; and Lots 1-5, Block 5. STAFF RECOMMENDATION 10. The Plat should be redesigned to separate the common area outlots between the existing attached and proposed detached units to allow separation of the associations, if necessary - this condition would impact Outlot B and Outlot D; or the applicant must provide documentation relating to inclusion of the proposed units into the current association. The applicants must show — either by design and conveyance of land to a new association which they control, or by formal agreement between the current association and the new plat — that the applicant's new units will have access rights across the common area of the outlots to the public street. Either alternative must be completed as a part of the application for Final Plat and Final PUD and to the satisfaction of the City Attorney. 11. The detached units should be designed to meet 6 foot side yard setbacks and 25 foot front yard setbacks to accommodate standard internal lot line easements and parking use of the front driveway areas. 12. The units adjacent to the existing attached buildings should be designed for submittal of Final Stage PUD documents to incorporate similar materials and colors, including siding, brick, and post design as noted. The unit designs, and designs that are similar in size and fagade detail to those proposed shall be the exclusive architecture used in the project, unless an appropriate amendment or adjustment is proposed and approved per the requirements of the PUD zoning regulations. 13. Prepare final Homeowners Association documents meeting the intent of the City and satisfying any concerns of the City Attorney relating to common maintenance and enforcement. As noted in item 1, above, the documents should reflect the clear right of the units proposed by the applicant to cross the common area to the public street. 12 City Council Agenda — 09/25/2017 14. Enforcement of Homeowners Association maintenance requirements shall not be enforced by the City of Monticello, but documents may not be amended without City approval via PUD Amendment until the Association has been turned over to individual homeowners from the control of the developer. 15. Add landscape plantings, including shrubs and perennials, to the private lot improvements for each detached unit, as illustrated in the accompanying building illustrations. 16. The plat lies along Jason Avenue, CSAH 18, and requires the review of Wright County for comment. 17. Comply with the requirements of the City Engineer's letter of August 25, 2017. 18. Comments of other City staff or those of the Planning Commission. 13 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2017-72 APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR DEVELOPMENT STAGE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR CARLISLE VILLAGE 61h ADDITION WHEREAS, the applicant owns property along Gateway Circle and Bakken Street, portions of Carlisle Village 2nd Addition; and WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted a request to plat said property into fourteen single family parcels, and outlots to contain common property improvements, and develop it as an "detached townhome" project under a PUD; and A WHEREAS, the site is guided for residential uses under the label "Places to Live" in the City's Comprehensive Plan; and 1 WHEREAS, the proposed PUD, along with the companion Plat, are consistent with the long- term use and development of the property for industrial uses; and WHEREAS, the Planning Comm Sion held a publiclke application and the applicant and members of Lc public present information to the Planning Commis d WHEREAS, the City Council has considered all o are incorporated by reference into the resolution; an on September 5th, 2017 on the the opportunity to the staff report, which WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: kkh The Plat provides an appropri eans of furthering the intent of the Comprehensive Plat%an he site by putting the existing and proposed improvements and toresidential uses. Ce proposed improvem is on the site under the Preliminary Plat are tent with the needs of the development in this location as a medium Q deMTfy residential area. The improvements will have expected impacts on public services, including sewer, water, stormwater treatment, and traffic which have been planned to serve the property for the development as proposed. The PUD flexibility for the project, including parcels without public street frontage, are consistent with the intent of the City's economic development objectives, as well as with the intent of the PUD zoning regulations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota: CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2017-72 The Monticello City Council hereby approves the Development Stage PUD for Carlisle Village 6th Addition, subject to the related codes and regulations for such use, and the following conditions: (CONDITIONS TO BE INSERTED PENDING COUNCIL ACTION) ADOPTED this 25th day of September, 2017, by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. IAL ATTEST: Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator 2 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2017-73 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR CARLISLE VILLAGE 6th ADDITION WHEREAS, the applicant owns property along Gateway Circle and Bakken Avenue, portions of Carlisle Village 2nd Addition; and WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted a request to plat said property into fourteen single family parcels, and outlots to contain common property imprments, and develop it as an "detached townhome" project under a PUD; and WHEREAS, the site is guided for residential uses u1 "Places to Live" in the City's Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the proposed PUD, along with the companion Plat, are9wistent with the long- term use and development of the propertyfor in strial uses; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a pub 'c hearing on September 017 on the application and the applicant and members of the pubkc were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference & the resolution; and I WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Monticello hereby makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: The Plat provides an appropriate means of furthering the intent of the Comprehensive Plan for the site by putting the existing and proposed improvements and is to residential uses. 2. The proposed improv is on the site under the Preliminary Plat are consistent with the needsqKf the development in this location as a medium density residential area. 3. The improvements will have expected impacts on public services, including sewer, water, stormwater treatment, and traffic which have been planned to serve the property for the development as proposed. 4.. The PUD flexibility for the project, including parcels without public street frontage, are consistent with the intent of the City's economic development objectives, as well as with the intent of the PUD zoning regulations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota: CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2017-73 The Monticello City Council hereby approves the Preliminary Plat for Carlisle Village 6th Addition, subject to compliance with related codes and regulations of subdivision, and the following conditions: (CONDITIONS TO BE INSERTED PENDING COUNCIL ACTION) ADOPTED this 25th day Monticello, Minnesota. ATTEST: Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator 2 ' the City of Paxmar, LLC- Request for Amdt to CUP for PUD, Development Stage PUD, & Preliminary Plat Blocks 1, 2, 3, and 5 and Outlot C, Carlisle Village 2nd Addition Created by: City of Monticello PA MAR . 8/1/2017 Ms. Angela Schuman Community Development Director City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street Suite 1 Monticello, MN 55362 Re: PUD Concept/Amendment Carlisle Village 6th Addition Dear Ms. Schuman, Council, Commissioner and consulting staff: This narrative provides a summary of the proposed scope for Lots 1-5, Block 1; Lots 1-3, Block 2; Lots 1-4, Block 3; Lots 1-5 Block 5; and Outlot C of Carlisle Village 2nd Addition. The objective of the amendment is to make 17 attached townhomes platted lots into 14 detached townhome lots. This would decrease Density by 2 units/acre. Changes to be made: Lots 1-5, Block 1; Lots 1-3, Block 2; and Outlot C would be re -platted to detached Townhome lots, adding 2 driveway accesses to Bakken Street and a utility connection. Lots 1-4, Block 3 would be re -platted to 3 detached Townhome lots, adding 1 driveway access to Bakken Street Lots 1-5, Block 5 would be re -platted to 4 detached Townhome lots Minimum Setbacks: Front Setback - 20' Side Setback - 5'/5' (10' between buildings) *note that these are the minimum and many distances will be greater The Lots are NOT currently part of the Villas at Gateway HOA and the 10 year period to add additional real estate has expired. We are open to joining the existing HOA if the legal means of joining can be accomplished or starting a new HOA. Regardless of which HOA option goes forward, the new units would provide the following: • Lawn maintenance • Snow removal • Lawn irrigation • ARC control • Ability to correct exterior blights or non-conformance 3495 Northdale Blvd. NW, Suite 210 Coon Rapids, MN 55448 (763)753-6176 PA_ MAR . Several utility connections would need to be utilized for irrigation or capped/abandoned We are currently aware of a master irrigation system serving the existing units in the Villas HOA. This would need to be mapped/located and some easements given. The front facades of the proposed homes would far exceed the existing unit standards. Brick, Stone, Shangles, Accent Trim, shutters, etc. will be utilized to promote varied and aesthetically pleasing front elevations. Paxmar purchased the property from Central Bank in 2011. The property had stalled out and the original developer gave it back to the bank. The intent of the amendment is to replace a less marketable attached product with an in demand detached style townhome. Construction would begin on the homes within 90 days of all entitlements being in place and all units could be full constructed by the end of 2018. Paxmar understands the financial requirements and sureties required by the platting/development process.. The adjacent partially developed property, Outlot A Carlisle Village 2nd Addition, would be developed in a substantially similar way, if this proposal is approved. In summation, this amendment would do several things: Decrease Density Complete a stalled -out project Increase exterior front elevations standards Increase revenue from property taxes Increase value of surrounding properties The attached units are already approved and could be built immediately but we feel our proposal is a better use for the surrounding neighborhood and community at large Respectfully, Alan Roessler Paxmar 3495 Northdale Blvd. NW, Suite 210 Coon Rapids, MN 55448 (763)753-6176 © 2017 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. for Site, Grading, Utility & Landscape Plan for Car lisle Village Monti'* cello, Ml'* nnesota Prepared for: Pax ar 3495 Northdale Blvd. NW Suite 210 Coon Rapids, Minnesota 55448 Contact: Kent Roessler Phone: 672-242-5051 Prepared by: Westwood Phone (952) 937-5150 7699 Anagram Drive Fax (952) 937-5822 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Toll Free (888) 937-5150 westwoodps.com Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Project number: 0008210.00 Contact: Cory Meyer 6th Addition Sheet List Table Sheet Number Sheet Title 1 Cover 2 Existing Conditions 3 Preliminary Plat & Site Plan 4 Grading Plan 5 Utility Service Plan 6 Details 7 LANDSCAPE PLAN Vicinity Map s. .. F-44, r`- e TA M NO. DATE r; r-' .,W --J S1 TE �. (Not to Scale REVISION SHEETS Development Stage Plans for Sanitary Sewer, Water Main, Storm Sewer and Streets for Carlisle Village 6th Addition Monticello, Minnesota Date: 06/12/17 Sheet: 1 of 7 •, 1 0008210CVFO1.dwg a, TA M NO. DATE r; r-' .,W --J S1 TE �. (Not to Scale REVISION SHEETS Development Stage Plans for Sanitary Sewer, Water Main, Storm Sewer and Streets for Carlisle Village 6th Addition Monticello, Minnesota Date: 06/12/17 Sheet: 1 of 7 •, 1 0008210CVFO1.dwg ® 2017 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. -Z Z_� Sq 1 V41 SAN C) Westwood ec-rn i nrrnr_r_-r a i r" Phone (952) 937-5150 7699 Anagram Drive Fax (952) 937-5822 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Toll Free (888) 937-5150 westwoocips.corn Westwood Professional Services, Inc. i 'I I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Ryan M Bluhm Date: 06/12/17 Ucense No. 41257 SANITARY MANHOLE 0 SEWER CLEANOUT U STORM MANHOLE ] CATCH BASIN ® BEEHIVE CATCH BASIN ® FLARED END SECTION ❑E ELECTRIC BOX ® CULVERT ELECTRIC METER L GA TE VAL VE I � \ CURB STOP BOX GAS METER ® � I —� SIGN—TRAFFIC/OTHER \ TELEPHONE BOX Tv CABLE TV BOX HH HAND HOLE STREET LIGHT CONIFEROUS TREE JL I I —CTV— CABLE TV —GAS— \ —POH— POWER OVERHEAD —PUG— \ `r SANITARY SEWER — I — WATER —4114— STORM SEWER FENCE LINE X —FOP— FIBER OPTIC —TUG— � I CURB & GUTTER \ I � \ � I \ I I \ � I � \ I I \ \ � I \ \ C) Westwood ec-rn i nrrnr_r_-r a i r" Phone (952) 937-5150 7699 Anagram Drive Fax (952) 937-5822 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Toll Free (888) 937-5150 westwoocips.corn Westwood Professional Services, Inc. i 'I I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Ryan M Bluhm Date: 06/12/17 Ucense No. 41257 4/ 1 dM dM SAN SAN WAT i i� —WAT#_� O t \ I / I \ I \ I -11 \ 5P a5eO,en Iv o yds N /\ e & tt�f ycPR�NLE o \ \ 9 TI \ sP '' .0r°inthe PING PO �P0 A6 �2 n p ILLP�E 2 is � A5 ' I v / E T tz tz D f \ \ Q) i \p15 �-5' SIDEWALK \ ,�QQ \ Drainage & Utility \ 1p� Rc \ \ /�'Vi Easement per the plot i of CARLISLE VILLAGE 49 ��- \ \ V� i 2ND ADDITION 15.1 00 �a -10 �o�bS ° i C9 \ oy�,Q / Vo IV \ �r J / / T/ /l T A L_lJ / /l STO Q Revisions: 7/24/2017 — City comments Checked: — Draw-= — Record Drawina by/date: Prepared for: Paxmar 3495 Northdale Blvd. NW Suite 210 Coon Rapids, Minnesota 55448 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Lot 1 through Lot 5, inclusive, Block 1, Lot 1 through Lot 3, inclusive, Block 2, Lot 1 through Lot 4, inclusive, Block 4, Lot 1 through Lot 5, inclusive, Block 5, Lot 1 through Lot 5, inclusive, Block 6 and Outlot C, CARLISLE VILLAGE 2ND ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Wright County, Minnesota. Carlisle Village 6th Addition Monticello, Minnesota Call 48 Hours before digging: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Twin City Area 651-454-0002 Mn. Toll Free 1-800-252-1166 LEGEND U SANITARY MANHOLE 0 SEWER CLEANOUT U STORM MANHOLE ] CATCH BASIN ® BEEHIVE CATCH BASIN ® FLARED END SECTION ❑E ELECTRIC BOX ® CULVERT ELECTRIC METER L GA TE VAL VE HYD. W/VALVE ❑s CURB STOP BOX GAS METER ® \ —� SIGN—TRAFFIC/OTHER ❑T TELEPHONE BOX Tv CABLE TV BOX HH 4/ 1 dM dM SAN SAN WAT i i� —WAT#_� O t \ I / I \ I \ I -11 \ 5P a5eO,en Iv o yds N /\ e & tt�f ycPR�NLE o \ \ 9 TI \ sP '' .0r°inthe PING PO �P0 A6 �2 n p ILLP�E 2 is � A5 ' I v / E T tz tz D f \ \ Q) i \p15 �-5' SIDEWALK \ ,�QQ \ Drainage & Utility \ 1p� Rc \ \ /�'Vi Easement per the plot i of CARLISLE VILLAGE 49 ��- \ \ V� i 2ND ADDITION 15.1 00 �a -10 �o�bS ° i C9 \ oy�,Q / Vo IV \ �r J / / T/ /l T A L_lJ / /l STO Q Revisions: 7/24/2017 — City comments Checked: — Draw-= — Record Drawina by/date: Prepared for: Paxmar 3495 Northdale Blvd. NW Suite 210 Coon Rapids, Minnesota 55448 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Lot 1 through Lot 5, inclusive, Block 1, Lot 1 through Lot 3, inclusive, Block 2, Lot 1 through Lot 4, inclusive, Block 4, Lot 1 through Lot 5, inclusive, Block 5, Lot 1 through Lot 5, inclusive, Block 6 and Outlot C, CARLISLE VILLAGE 2ND ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Wright County, Minnesota. Carlisle Village 6th Addition Monticello, Minnesota Call 48 Hours before digging: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Twin City Area 651-454-0002 Mn. Toll Free 1-800-252-1166 LEGEND U SANITARY MANHOLE 0 SEWER CLEANOUT U STORM MANHOLE ] CATCH BASIN ® BEEHIVE CATCH BASIN ® FLARED END SECTION ❑E ELECTRIC BOX ® CULVERT ELECTRIC METER D4 GA TE VAL VE HYD. W/VALVE ❑s CURB STOP BOX GAS METER ® STEEL/WOOD POST —� SIGN—TRAFFIC/OTHER ❑T TELEPHONE BOX Tv CABLE TV BOX HH HAND HOLE STREET LIGHT CONIFEROUS TREE JL WETLAND —CTV— CABLE TV —GAS— GAS LINE —POH— POWER OVERHEAD —PUG— POWER UNDERGROUND SANITARY SEWER — I — WATER —4114— STORM SEWER FENCE LINE X —FOP— FIBER OPTIC —TUG— TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND CURB & GUTTER 0' 40' 80' 120' 0008210EXP01.dwg Date: 06/12/17 sheet: 2 of 7 Existing Conditions c 2017 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. 0 J% O II II Westwood Phone (952) 937-5150 7699 Anagram Drive Fax (952) 937-5822 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Toll Free (888) 937-5150 westwoodps.com Westwood Professional Services, Inc. 7,763.87 sf `EXISTNG 5' SIDEWALK �` Ao ro / \ \ EXISTING 5'- �°�� ' �'I '/ O \ \ SIDEWALK / 2,5J8 sf 17 O ` �p \ J sf JJ ^ro. — \ - /----REPLATTED INTERNAL LOT LINE \ \ / 3,270 sf % ` 160 ///2,532 sf��EXISTING PLATTED a U //' LOT ENVELOPE EXISTING PLATTED INTERNAL PLAT LINES 2,245 sf TYP \ 2,532 sfll ❑T 2,216 sf f' \ -7 d � y I I� � I I I ❑ D4 I Q _ I I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my RevWons: Prepared for. direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed PROFESSIONAL Domed; — ENGINEER under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 7/24/2017 – City comments Checked: — Drawn: — Ryan M Bluhm Date: 06/12/17 License No. 41257 Record Drawinit by/date Paxmar 3495 Northdale Blvd. NW Suite 210 Coon Rapids, Minnesota 55448 Call 48 Hours before digging: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Twin City Area 651-454-0002 Mn. Toll Free 1-800-252-1166 •1a�i#11115•1�>•1�.�i•J_�r_� Total Site Area 1.50± Ac. *Overall Buildable Area 30,463 sf (2,176 sf/lot ovg) Existing Zoning R-2 LEGEND Total Units 14 Units Site Density (gross) 9.33 un/ac PUD Zoning Standards 20' min. O SANITARY MANHOLE — Front Setback to public R/W 10' Total b/tw buildings (515) co SEWER CLEANOUT — Building to Building setback 0' — Setback to Platted Envelope/ O STORM MANHOLE Outlot Typical Driveway Width (2 car home) 16' ❑ CATCH BASIN Typical Driveway Width (3 car home) 22-24' Minimum Driveway Length (to curb) 27' ® BEEHIVE CATCH BASIN *Buildable area = Lot area less setbacks & easements ® FLARED END SECTION ❑E ELECTRIC BOX PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: ® CULVERT Lot 1 through Lot 5, inclusive, Block 1, Lot 1 through Lot 3, inclusive, Block 2, Lot 1 through Lot 4, inclusive, Block 4, Lot 1 through Lot 5, inclusive, ELECTRIC METER Block 5, Lot 1 through Lot 5, inclusive, Block 6 and Outlot C, CARLISLE VILLAGE 2ND ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Wright D4 GATE VALVE County, Minnesota. o� HYD. W/VALVE ❑ CURB STOP BOX HOUSE DETAILS (not to scale) GAS METER ® STEEL/WOOD POST ------ —� SIGN—TRAFFIC/OTHER DECK' ❑T TELEPHONE BOX 26.0 Tv CABLE TV BOX 12 HAND HOLE o ----- o STREET LIGHT CONIFEROUS TREE GARAGE WETLAND ----26.0 --- —crv— CABLE TV —Gas— GAS LINE —POH— POWER OVERHEAD —PUG— POWER UNDERGROUND SANITARY SEWER I WATER — // — STORM SEWER X FENCE LINE FOP FIBER OPTIC —TUG— TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND CURB & GUTTER Carlisle Village X 0' 40' 80' 120' 0008210SPF01.dwg Date: 06/12/17 sheet: 3 of 7 6th Addition Preliminary Plat & Site Plan Monticello, Minnesota © 2017 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. v '\ SILT E ISTING STMH \\RDE=965.63 IE (ISE)=957.68 \ IE (�)=956.98 / \ IE )=956.58 EXISTING CBMH ^\ RE=9 2.02 E. 0. / EXISTING CB IE (SW)=958.50--7 966.x/ / RE=961.89 \ \ \ IE (SE)=95.71 IE =958.54 96, �� \ IE (NE)=957.69 / 96 I4CETYP. 966 ( 964 I L F�',, . \ / / C 968 /-0 64 • SE 0 3 68 sae `v X970, 7.1 72 ' 68, J I ,0 ,0 66.6 0 61 / 6 1 X09 69. Z O �° \ E. \ 1 84% �• II ,-7970 > i 'IT 968 �, Q / 6 \,\ a S S EXISTING STMH 1 \ P' RE=966.07 G TMH ss.s 6 `1I , / `I :967.99 69 ° E.O.F. IE (W)=961.22 `\966.0 IE (NW)(SE)-959.51 :9 2.24 sss =9 1.79 N 968 __01968. 67.9 ' � A �� O� 96 MHS 7 \ ��' "� 96 EXISTING FES ,46 lb ,46 �o, / IE =961.38 I ss.s , cb' �o - I 1 EX. POND NWL = 961.0 I I ,� //\ v / / HWL = 964.8 I l . / E I I 69.7 j ^Oi 399 5 \ I I I I 1 r\ \ 69.6 � �V �j 1 J 0 `ECT+ON AT/ `V SINS (TYP.) f � \ / CJO GENEUL GRADING do DRAINAGE NOTES: • ALL CONTOURS AND SPOT ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN TO FINISHED SURFACE/GUTTER GRADES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. • REFER TO THE SITE PLAN/RECORD PLAT FOR MOST CURRENT HORIZONTAL SITE DIMENSIONS AND LAYOUT. • THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE LOCATION AND ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHICAL FEATURES WITH THE OWNERS AND FIELD -VERIFY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM PLAN. • ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO LOCAL RULES. • CONTRACTOR IS TO CALL 811 OR CALL811.COM FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS. • CONTRACTOR MUST BE AWARE OF ALL EXISTING & PROPOSED UTILITIES. • HAULING HOURS MUST BE CONFIRMED WITH THE CITY PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK. • POSITIVE DRAINAGE FROM THE SITE MUST BE PROVIDED AT ALL TIMES. Westwood Phone (952) 937-5150 7699 Anagram Drive Fax (952) 937-5822 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Toll Free (888) 937-5150 westwoodps.com Westwood professional Services, Inc. EROSION CONTROL NOTES: • ALL SILT FENCE AND OTHER EROSION CONTROL FEATURES SHALL BE IN-PLACE PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION AND SHALL BE MAINTAINED UNTIL VIABLE TURF OR GROUND COVER HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED. EXISTING SILT FENCE ON-SITE SHALL BE MAINTAINED AND OR REMOVED AND SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO THE GRADING CONTRACT. IT IS OF EXTREME IMPORTANCE TO BE AWARE OF CURRENT FIELD CONDITIONS WITH RESPECT TO EROSION CONTROL. TEMPORARY PONDING, DIKES, HAY BALES, ETC., REQUIRED BY THE CITY SHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO THE GRADING CONTRACT. • TOP SOIL SHALL BE STOCK PILED & RE -SPREAD ONSITE AT A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 6". • ALL STREETS DISTURBED DURING WORKING HOURS MUST BE CLEANED AT THE END OF EACH WORKING DAY. A ROCK ENTRANCE TO THE SITE MUST BE PROVIDED ACCORDING TO DETAILS TO REDUCE TRACKING OF DIRT ONTO PUBLIC STREETS. I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER under the laws of State o Minnesota. Ryan M Bluhm Date: 06/12/17 License No. 41257 SELO = SPLIT ENTRY LOKKOUT, GRADED FOR 0' OF DIFFERENCE FROM THE REAR GROUND GRADE AT THE LOOKOUT TO THE FRONT GROUND GRADE AT THE GARAGE DOOR. TYPICAL LOT SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES ON STORM STRUCTURES (TYP.) TEMPORARY ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE HOUSE/ BUILDING PAD SILT FENCE OR OTHER PERIMETER CONTROL AROUND PROPERTY LINE WHERE THERE IS POSITIVE SLOPE TO OFFSITE DRAINAGE ARROW (TYP.) l^ YARD TO HAVE 1 0.5 OF TOPSOIL UPON COMPLETION OF HOME CONSTRUCTION \moo°o°o°1 1 °°°o; °o°o°o°; 3°°°°°°° °o°s°s °°°° °o°o°o°; °°°° �l 1°1°7°m$°I �� l 3, °o, % _j33300-00000."0000-, � a40400 1poor TYPICAL STREET CURB AND GUTTER TYPICAL STREET SILT FENCE OR OTHER CENTERLINE PERIMETER CONTROL SEDIMENT CONTROL ALONG BACK SIDE OF DEVICES ON STORM CURB LINE OR EXISTING SOD. STRUCTURES (TYP.) TYPICAL EROSION CONTROL FOR SINGLE FAMILY HOME CONSTRUCTION SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES ON STORM STRUCTURES (TYP.) TEMPORARY ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE HOUSE/ BUILDING PAD SILT FENCE OR OTHER PERIMETER CONTROL AROUND PROPERTY LINE WHERE THERE IS POSITIVE SLOPE TO OFFSITE TYPICAL STREET CURB AND GUTTER YARD TO HAVE 0.5' OF TOPSOIL UPON COMPLETION OF HOME CONSTRUCTION ,( SEDIMENT CONTROL / I DEVICES ON STORM STRUCTURES (TYP.) SILT FENCE OR OTHER TYPICAL STREET PERIMETER CONTROL SEDIMENT CONTROL CENTERLINE ALONG BACK SIDE OF DEVICES ON STORM CURB LINE OR EXISTING SOD. STRUCTURES (TYP.) TYPICAL EROSION CONTROL FOR SINGLE FAMILY HOME CONSTRUCTION (CORNER LOT) DRAINAGE ARROW 1 i REAR GROUND GRADE 99!1.0 p- 987.0 e_ MINIMUM BASEMENT FLOOR ELEVATION SELO 991.0 Q w FRONT GROUND GRADE > AT GARAGE DOOR >„ o Checked: - Drawn: - Record Drawinit by/date: Prepared for. Paxmar 3495 Northdale Blvd. NW Suite 210 Coon Rapids, Minnesota 55448 Call 48 Hours before digging: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Twin City Area 651-454-0002 Mn. Toll Free 1-800-252-1166 EDLL,.-)jAG LEGEND 0 STORM MANHOLE ❑T TELEPHONE BOX TELEPHONE MANHOLE Iia GATE VALVE P4 HYD. W/VALVE WATER METER D CURB STOP BOX t SANITARY SEWER - I - WATER STORM SEWER -� SIGN ° SIGN © CABLE TV BOX 0 ELECTRIC BOX O SANITARY MANHOLE ❑ CATCH BASIN Q FLARED END SECTION -'980- CONTOURS x 856.3 SPOT ELEVATION E.O.F. EMERGENCY OVERFLOW PROPOSED LEGEND X980- - DENOTES PROPOSED CONTOURS DENOTES INLET PROTECTION AT CATCH BASINS DENOTES SILT FENCE 0' 50' 100' 150' 000821 OGDF01.dwg Date- 06/12/17 Sheet» 4 of 7 Carlisle Village 6th Addition Grading Plan Monticello, Minnesota c 2017 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Westwood Phone (952) 937-5150 7699 Anagram Drive Fax (952) 937-5822 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Toll Free (888) 937-5150 westwoocips.com Westwood Professional Services, Inc. D \ I / \ 4TTAP EXISTING 8" DIP, \ \ 24LF—1" TYPE K�COPPER WATER' SERVICE w/CU B STOP \ \ \ CONNI�CT TO EXISTING A" PVC — p 34 LR 26 SANITARY SERVICE \ 8x4 SADLE _ / D EXISTING MANHOLE \ qa WYE =0 -87 RE=971.83 ,3:0' RI R IE =955.22 UTILITY EXCA,ATION PER CITY \ 960.3 DETAIL PLATE NO. 7006 I REPLACE CONCRETE CURB, \ a o \ BITUMINOUS, GRAVEL, / GRANULAR BORROW (INKIND)/ �° L7 a EXISTING 8" DIP WATERMAIN \ \ EXISTING MANHOLE T RE=967.57 IE =956.27 959.3 \ T 959.3 F- ' General Utility Notes • THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND NOTIFY THE OWNER OF ANY DIFFERENCES. • UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL MATERIALS, CONST. TECHNIQUES AND TESTING SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY OF MONTICELLO ENGINEERING GUIDELINES & THE 1999 ED. OF THE "STANDARD UTILITIES SPECIFICATIONS FOR WATER MAIN AND SERVICE LINE INSTALLATION AND SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER INSTALLATION BY THE CITY ENGINEERING ASSOCIATION OF MINN." AND TO THE "STANDARD SPECIFICATION FOR HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION" MINN. DEPT. OF TRANS., AUGUST 31, 2005 INCLUDING THE CURRENT ADDENDUM. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE REQUIRED TO FOLLOW ALL PROCEDURES AS OUTLINED BY THE LOCAL AGENCY. • THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RECEIVE THE NECESSARY PERMITS FOR ALL WORK OUTSIDE OF THE PROPERTY LIMITS. • VERIFY EXISTING INVERT LOC. & ELEV. PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my Revision&: direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER under the laws of State o Minnesota. Ryan M Bluhm Date: 06/12/17 License No. 41257 E T \ 958.o EXISTING 4" PVC SDR 26 \ 57.6 \ SANITARY SERVICE \ EXISTING 1 TYPE K COPPER 3 _ WATER SERVICE w/CURB STOP (TYP.) 9 / I EXISTING SANITARY SERVICE AND WATER SERVICE TO BE ABANDONED PER CITY GUIDELINES (TYP) 0 i 957.6 \ 957.4 a \ 95 / 957.6 E EXISTING SANITARY SERVICE AND WATER SERVICE TO BE ABANDONED PER CITY GUIDELINES • THE WATER SERVICE SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH A MIN. OF 7.5 FT. OF COVER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE CITY AS—BUILT CONSTRUCTION PLANS TO CHECK LOCATION AND MATERIAL TYPE. • THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS PRIOR TO UTILITY INSTALLATION. • MAINTAIN MINIMUM 18" VERTICAL SEPARATION BETWEEN WATER MAIN & SANITARY SEWER. • COMPACTION EFFORTS INSIDE YARD AREAS SHALL MEET SPECS CALLED FOR UNDER STREETS. Checked: Drawn: Record Drawina by/date: Prepared for: Paxmar 3495 Northdale Blvd. NW Suite 210 Coon Rapids, Minnesota 55448 Carlisle Village Call 48 Hours before digging: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Twin City Area 651-454-0002 Mn. Toll Free 1-800-252-1166 EXE i uIG LEGEND 0 TELEPHONE BOX O TELEPHONE MANHOLE 9 WATER METER 0 CURB STOP BOX —� SIGN _77= SIGN Tv CABLE TV BOX E0 ELECTRIC BOX GATE VALVE HYD. W/VALVE 0 STORM MANHOLE —4— SANITARY SEWER — I — WATER — // — STORM SEWER 0 SANITARY MANHOLE ❑ CATCH BASIN Q FLARED END SECTION 949.5 SANITARY SEWER SERVICE INVERT PROPOSED LEGEND SANITARY SEWER 949.5 SERVICE INVERT 0' 50' 100' 150' 0008210UTF01.dwg Date: 06/12/17 sheet: 5 of 7 6th Addition Utility Service Plan Monticello, Minnesota 1 10 2017 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. STEEL T -STYLE FENCE POST PAINTED BLUE WITH AN OIL BASED PAINT AND MINIMUM 2" REFLECTORIZED TAPE (ENGINEER GRADE) AT THE TOP OF THE POST TO MARK CURB STOP. TO BE INSTALLED AT THE TIME OF CURB STOP INSTALLATION (INCIDENTAL) �w �w z z wW wW ¢wa wW wW 0w zI,NI J CL o J 4 a STREET a 4' 12• 12' AS REQUIRED AS REQUIRED GROUND LINE 11'- 0" - 11'- 0"- GROUND LINE CURB BOX WITH 1'- 1 1/4 STANDPIPE AND STATIONARY ROD 7'- 6" MIN COVER 1" CORP. COCK I 1 BRICK 1" COPPER 1" COPPER J `BRICK 4" X 8" X 2" WATERMAlN 4" X 8" X 2" CAP CURB STOP WITH BLANK SLUG (TYPICAL) NOTE: ATTACH SHUT OF ROD TO CURB STOP SEE SPEC. Standard Plate Library City of Monticello R.O.W Title: Typical Water Service Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised: 03-15 2006 PROPOSED UTILITYCURB LINE z STEEL T -STYLE FENCE POST PAINTED GREEN WITH AN OIL BASED PAINT AND A MINIMUM 2" REFLECTORIZED TAPE 1 (ENGINEER GRADE) AT THE TOP OF THE POST TO MARK THE SERVICE STUB TO BE INSTALLED AT THE TIME OF SERVICE DEPTH OF COVER OVER_ INSTALLATION (INCIDENTAL_) TOP OF PIPE TO SUIT r 4" OR 6" PVC q- FIELD CONDITIONS PIPE SHALL BE COMPLETELY ENTRENCHED- 1 AND SHALL HAVE CLASS "B" BEDDING -- WHERE DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER 6" SEE JOINT DETAIL BELOW MIN R /W PLACE NEARLY HORIZONTAL FOR LOW J 12 BASEMENTS AND SHALLOW SEWER AS DRAINAGE AND DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER UTILITY EASEMENT FTYPICAL SERVICE WHERE COVER OVER TOP OF SEWER IS 12' OR LESS NOTES: 5 PVC = POLY -VINYL CHLORIDE SDR 26 DEPTH OF COVER OVER TOP OF PIPE TO SUIT ALL SERVICE CONNECTIONS INCLUDING NECESSARY FIELD CONDITIONS BENDS AND SPECIAL FITTINGS SHALL BE PAID FOR AT THE CONTRACT UNIT PRICE BID PER LINEAR FOOT OF 4" OR 6". NO ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION SHALL BE ALLOWED FOR CONCRETE ENCASEMENT OR PIPE BEDDING. 4" OR 6" PVC 45°9FND W,E� ELEV TO BE SET BY THE ENGINEER - CONTRACTOR q• / TO VERIFY PRIOR TO BURY MIN PIPE SHALL BE COMPLETELY ENTRENCHED AND SHALL HAVE CLASS "B" BEDDING WHERE DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER CONCRETE ENCASEMENT SEE DETAIL BELOW FOR CAULKING BETWEEN 6„ DISSIMILAR PIPES MIN EXISTING UTILITY EXISTING UTILITY CENTERLINE ROAD MILL 1 1/2 " BITUMINOUS TO LANE LINE MILL 1 1/2 " BITUMINOUS 2 FEET OUTSIDE OR FOG LINE OF EXCAVATION LIMITS OR AS DIRECTED BY ENGINEER CURB LINE R.O.W BIT WEAR COURSE 2357 TACK COAT FULL DEPTH SAWCUT OF BITUMINOUS BASE MILL AND OVERLAY 2FT IS REQUIRED 1' AROUND EXCAVATION EDGE / BEYOND BIIT EXCAVATION WEAR PLACEMENT R BIT BASE COURSE 1' 1' CLASS 5 1, T — — —� OQ� 0 Oc 1100% STANDARD 3, PROCTOR DENSITY `% STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY EXCAVATION AREA (WIDTH VARIES) OSHA APPROVED SLOPES TO EXISTING UTILITY73 EXISTING UTILITY Title: Standard Plate Librax Utility Excavation In City Library Streets 5 Years or Older City of Monticello Date: Plate No. 03-05 7nnk _- Kevised• 03-17 Standard Plate Library City of Monticello E SPECIAL NOTE: SPECIAL ATTENTION SHALL BE PAID WHEN INSTALLING DRIVEWAYS TO NOT UNDERMINE OR DAMAGE EXISTING SIDEWALKS. Call 48 Hours before digging: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Twin City Area 651-454-0002 Mn. Toll Free 1-800-252-1166 4 / CURB & GUTTER STREET / GROUND / LINE BUILDING 2, INSTALLED BY PRIVATE CONTRACT INSTALLED AS PER CITY CONTRACT / TRACER WIRE LOCATE BOX 1 GROUND LINE 99 0C, TRACER WIRE SPLICE / �- CURB BOX STANDPIPE / O O(jO��_ �0 2' SPOOL COPPER -CLAD STEEL AWG 12 v ` / I COPPER -CLAD STEEL AWG 12 GAUGE I / � � o GAUGE TRACER WIRE 30 MIL HIGH DENSITY _ TRACER WIRE 30 MIL HIGH DENSITY I POLYETHYLENE GREEN COLORED JACKET _ p POLYETHYLENE GREEN COLORED JACKET - r) t - - -_� _ p I TO BE PROVIDED UNDER PRIVATE f' TO BE PROVIDE UNDER CIN CONTRACTCON. RACT C, �✓ 01 1" 1" COPPER WATERMAlN \\ _—COPPER -CLAD STEEL AWG 12 GAUGE 3" OF 1-1/2" ROCK--] TRACER WIRE MIL HIGH DENSITY OR T / OLYETHLNE GREEN COLORED JACKET / TO BE PROVIDED UNDER CITY CONTRACT 6" CRUSHED CONCRETE�R APPROVED EQUIVAr�NT / SANITARY SERVICE MAINLINE / TAPER L3" OF 1-1/2" ROCK SANITARY SEWER DEPTH AND WIDTH OR J i0' 6" CRUSHED CONCRETE SIDEWALK Title: Typical Service Connection Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised: 3004 03-15 PLAN WIMCO ROAD DRAIN CG -23* HIGH FLOW INLET PROTECTION CURB AND GUTTER MODEL OR CITY APPROVED EQUAL. * FOR THE NEW R -3290 -VB STANDARD CASTING, INSTALL WIMCO ROAD DRAIN CG -3290 OR CITY APPROVED EQUAL. Standard Plate Library City of Monticello DF 1EIGHT DEFLECTOR PLATE — OVERFLOW IS Y2 OF THE CURB BOX HEIGHT OVERFLOW AT TOP OF FILTER ASSEMBLY FILTER ASSEMBLY DIAMETER, 6" ON -GRADE 10" AT LOW POINT HIGH-FLOW FABRIC Title: Inlet Protection Catch Basin Insert Date: 03-07 Plate No. Revised: 03-15 6004 Standard Plate Library City of Monticello OVERFLOW SLOT IN SHROUD Title: Tracer Wire (New Developments) Date: 03-08 Plate No. Revised: 03-15 3005 OVERFLOW SLOT IN SHROUD Westwood I hereby certify that this plan was prepared se me or under my Revisions: direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed PROFESSIONAL Degigmik- ENGINM under the laws of the State o Minnesota. Checke& Phone (952) 937-5150 7699 Anagram Drive Fax (952) 937-5822 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 (Drawn: Toll Free (888) 937-5150 westwoodps.com Ryan M Bluhm Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Date: 06/12/17 License No, 412'5x7 Record Drawing �/�� r Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Prepared for: WING NUT ATTACHMENT HOOK SILT FABRIC SLEEVE PER MnDOT SPECIAL PROVISION 3886 SILT FABRIC SLEEVE PER MnDOT SPECIAL PROVISION 3886 Title: Inlet Protection Grate Inlet Cover Date: 03-07 Plate No. Revised: 03-15 6005 /r Standard Plate Library City of Monticello ON TYPICAL SERVICE WHERE COVER OVER ADAPTER TO BE RESILIENT TOP OF SEWER IS 12' OR MORE ASTM C425-64 TYPE III OR APPROVED EQUAL FOR w 3 0 DISSIMILAR PIPES 6 CONCRETE ENCASEMENT OQ- (TYPICAL) PVC WYE VCP TO PVC FERNCO ENCASED IN - CONCRETE SHALL BE REQUIRED WHEN CONNECTING TO EXISTING J DETAIL VCP SEWER MAIN (INCIDENTAL). CONCRETE ENCASEMENT (TYPICAL) THRUST BLOCKING FOR CLEANING EQUIPMENT � EXISTING UTILITY EXISTING UTILITY CENTERLINE ROAD MILL 1 1/2 " BITUMINOUS TO LANE LINE MILL 1 1/2 " BITUMINOUS 2 FEET OUTSIDE OR FOG LINE OF EXCAVATION LIMITS OR AS DIRECTED BY ENGINEER CURB LINE R.O.W BIT WEAR COURSE 2357 TACK COAT FULL DEPTH SAWCUT OF BITUMINOUS BASE MILL AND OVERLAY 2FT IS REQUIRED 1' AROUND EXCAVATION EDGE / BEYOND BIIT EXCAVATION WEAR PLACEMENT R BIT BASE COURSE 1' 1' CLASS 5 1, T — — —� OQ� 0 Oc 1100% STANDARD 3, PROCTOR DENSITY `% STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY EXCAVATION AREA (WIDTH VARIES) OSHA APPROVED SLOPES TO EXISTING UTILITY73 EXISTING UTILITY Title: Standard Plate Librax Utility Excavation In City Library Streets 5 Years or Older City of Monticello Date: Plate No. 03-05 7nnk _- Kevised• 03-17 Standard Plate Library City of Monticello E SPECIAL NOTE: SPECIAL ATTENTION SHALL BE PAID WHEN INSTALLING DRIVEWAYS TO NOT UNDERMINE OR DAMAGE EXISTING SIDEWALKS. Call 48 Hours before digging: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Twin City Area 651-454-0002 Mn. Toll Free 1-800-252-1166 4 / CURB & GUTTER STREET / GROUND / LINE BUILDING 2, INSTALLED BY PRIVATE CONTRACT INSTALLED AS PER CITY CONTRACT / TRACER WIRE LOCATE BOX 1 GROUND LINE 99 0C, TRACER WIRE SPLICE / �- CURB BOX STANDPIPE / O O(jO��_ �0 2' SPOOL COPPER -CLAD STEEL AWG 12 v ` / I COPPER -CLAD STEEL AWG 12 GAUGE I / � � o GAUGE TRACER WIRE 30 MIL HIGH DENSITY _ TRACER WIRE 30 MIL HIGH DENSITY I POLYETHYLENE GREEN COLORED JACKET _ p POLYETHYLENE GREEN COLORED JACKET - r) t - - -_� _ p I TO BE PROVIDED UNDER PRIVATE f' TO BE PROVIDE UNDER CIN CONTRACTCON. RACT C, �✓ 01 1" 1" COPPER WATERMAlN \\ _—COPPER -CLAD STEEL AWG 12 GAUGE 3" OF 1-1/2" ROCK--] TRACER WIRE MIL HIGH DENSITY OR T / OLYETHLNE GREEN COLORED JACKET / TO BE PROVIDED UNDER CITY CONTRACT 6" CRUSHED CONCRETE�R APPROVED EQUIVAr�NT / SANITARY SERVICE MAINLINE / TAPER L3" OF 1-1/2" ROCK SANITARY SEWER DEPTH AND WIDTH OR J i0' 6" CRUSHED CONCRETE SIDEWALK Title: Typical Service Connection Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised: 3004 03-15 PLAN WIMCO ROAD DRAIN CG -23* HIGH FLOW INLET PROTECTION CURB AND GUTTER MODEL OR CITY APPROVED EQUAL. * FOR THE NEW R -3290 -VB STANDARD CASTING, INSTALL WIMCO ROAD DRAIN CG -3290 OR CITY APPROVED EQUAL. Standard Plate Library City of Monticello DF 1EIGHT DEFLECTOR PLATE — OVERFLOW IS Y2 OF THE CURB BOX HEIGHT OVERFLOW AT TOP OF FILTER ASSEMBLY FILTER ASSEMBLY DIAMETER, 6" ON -GRADE 10" AT LOW POINT HIGH-FLOW FABRIC Title: Inlet Protection Catch Basin Insert Date: 03-07 Plate No. Revised: 03-15 6004 Standard Plate Library City of Monticello OVERFLOW SLOT IN SHROUD Title: Tracer Wire (New Developments) Date: 03-08 Plate No. Revised: 03-15 3005 OVERFLOW SLOT IN SHROUD Westwood I hereby certify that this plan was prepared se me or under my Revisions: direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed PROFESSIONAL Degigmik- ENGINM under the laws of the State o Minnesota. Checke& Phone (952) 937-5150 7699 Anagram Drive Fax (952) 937-5822 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 (Drawn: Toll Free (888) 937-5150 westwoodps.com Ryan M Bluhm Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Date: 06/12/17 License No, 412'5x7 Record Drawing �/�� r Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Prepared for: WING NUT ATTACHMENT HOOK SILT FABRIC SLEEVE PER MnDOT SPECIAL PROVISION 3886 SILT FABRIC SLEEVE PER MnDOT SPECIAL PROVISION 3886 Title: Inlet Protection Grate Inlet Cover Date: 03-07 Plate No. Revised: 03-15 6005 /r Standard Plate Library City of Monticello ON Paxmar 3495 Northdale Blvd. NW Suite 210 Coon Rapids, Minnesota 55448 Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Title: Residential Gravel Construction Entrance Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised: 6001 03-15 111 \ wm m: D N Eo m NQ ° 3 w 3 0 m� II L ym ZO O 0 E o� II U 0w �� x <v a � /JU I �ffi II II I I Oa MO�d Q- z O o W a wax w` r ^ do U D W w mQ D Q XU Hx NVWj SOW II m WO_ w w0 U7 II N I LC j zw x } J mW W O 0 Q oQOz0- xx¢ F W Ja I I II H- zN w Ii I I Z W �¢ Oo �' I a Q W9 V O II x 0 Ld N ¢I �� M '0 J7 o Q i� a. W W Q 0 = H J (f) x WW a Z Z w Q w UO x W �� s "co Z W W O 3 O i- ZW a ¢3 WHO~ �a mo O�UK 0 ZW Q Q W J x Q W W2 V N^ca 5 3 U WWW Q J M x `M< m z w Em `o$ 'i o. 0 X O� wx NW Wx �} mw UO z- ZD �� MI VV oy; 0 11 FIE II Z F 00 Z On Z m ¢ g wN ;I oW ¢ n Z J a oM oo a - Q 7 U¢ N Wx H V 'Mf, Q Nm a II W 42 J0 wa OQ W fou II W wW W -0 x ww-< �K Qaw' J �W 0 FF =CL 0 W II N > KOW II N OF z 0 m NOH x 0 w Z- W N W 0W W 0�4a� x yy \ II M NO N0 z Z s`f N J W U L Q j w o r N W� 4 Ilil I� �I II 70 aw Si yW J0 Mx z} cnwa OF xU Fmw M, 1-1 �W x�waz !n U oz a. OFNam k =] WON f NO 7N0 Q�NZQ FW -O Oz VI7--W U'ZZ J `'' �J ® ZJ �iNw z 0 U ' Erosion Control Q QOZO W= wx¢ < a n W I m z z ao Ja Revised: 03-15 o_ i��OO zma-o V (1 IL N Q 'n� O MI n ¢, m w I 1 / W U ' N N 00 Q O W JU - 8 x xx xa J W O Fwd m 0m00 xz ' 1 1 r 'A WF NpFx D 40 w F�a o w 6 QQ o_ I w OaNZ OFZW z } V) zw OZQ UQx > p DOW(wn wz D W O N Z U< 1—<01�0 Z F U f IZW.3 -DQ a LL K }ym ZNFz�_ J I.WI.� 0 U Z O U 0M. qOq MCI�JW wFIS m 2 N m Paxmar 3495 Northdale Blvd. NW Suite 210 Coon Rapids, Minnesota 55448 Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Title: Residential Gravel Construction Entrance Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised: 6001 03-15 111 0008210DTF01.dwg Date: 06/12/17 sheet: 6 of 7 Carlisle Village 6th Addition Details Monticello, Minnesota Eo m NQ ° 3 m� II L ym E o� II U 0"3 I II � /JU I �ffi II II I I O o W a zo ^ do U D W w o>.. I I v Q XU > NVWj SOW II m WO_ w w0 U7 II N I LC j x wm mW W O 0 Q to xx¢ F W Ja I I II H- zN w Ii I I Z W �¢ Oo �' I OQ Fw Z W W9 V O II x 0 Ld N ¢I �� M zUrn I a ie in Q i� a. W W Q 0 = H J (f) x WW L, O P= wV w UO x W �� s "co Z W U �~ENa'3 O i- ZW ww ¢3 5mN0 W J x Q W W2 V N^ca 5 3 U x `M< o Em `o$ 'i o. 0 X O� wx NW Wx �} mw UO z- ZD �� MI VV oy; 0 11 FIE II CJ ip ox �x g wN ;I oW O xQ a oM oo a - Iii I Z H V 'Mf, Q Nm a II W Q¢U OQ W fou II W wW W -0 x t -x W N>Z_> cq c II >« J �W 0 FF =CL 0 W II N > KOW II N J O m Z- W N W 0W W �a 0 W -0 } W yy \ II M NO N0 <x II I I I CV Ml 4 Ilil I� �I II } I I Y o I I v I I to A CALL TO GOPHER STATE ONE (454-0002) IS REQUIRED A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS PRIOR TO PERFORMING ANY EXCAVATION. Title: Residential Building Erosion Control Date: 03-05 Plate No. 6006 Revised: 03-15 0008210DTF01.dwg Date: 06/12/17 sheet: 6 of 7 Carlisle Village 6th Addition Details Monticello, Minnesota © 2017 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Final Plant Schedule Planting Legend CODE QTY. COMMON/BOTANICAL NAME SIZE SPACING O.C. FFM 8 Fall Fiesta Maple / Acer saccharum 'Bailista' 2" BB AS SHOWN DENOTES DECIDUOUS OVERSTORY TREE BVL 6 Boulevard Linden / Tilia americana 'Boulevard' 2" BB AS SHOWN PRE 5 Princeton Elm / Ulmus americana 'Princeton' 2" BB AS SHOWN DENOTES BUFFER EVERGREEN TREE BHS 6 Black Hills Spruce / Picea glauca densato 6' HT., BB AS SHOWN NOS 4 Norway Spruce / Picea abies 6' HT., BB AS SHOWN NOTE: QUANTITIES ON PLAN SUPERSEDE LIST QUANTITIES IN THE EVENT OF A DISCREPANCY. I hereby certify that this plan was prepared me or under Revieione Westwood AL direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed PROFESSIONAL Dom; NTM LANDSCAPE ARCMBCT under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Checked:- CLM Phone (952) 937-5150 7699 Anagram Drive Fax (952) 937-5822 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Drawn: NTM Toll Free (888) 937-5150 westwoodps.com Cory Meyer Westwood Profemlonal Services, Inc. W12/17 26971 Record Drawtntt by/date Date: License No, Planting Details DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING PRUNE OUT MISDIRECTED BRANCHES. PROVIDE ONE CENTRAL LEADER. GUYING AND STAKING, (OPTIONAL) FOR ONE (1) YEAR ON ALL DECIDUOUS AND CONIFEROUS TREES: TOP STAKES 5' ABOVE GROUND (MAX.) OR TO FIRST BRANCH. BOTTOM OF STAKE 3' (MIN.) BELOW GROUND. STAKING POSTS TO BE 2"X2" STAINED WOOD OR PAINTED STEEL DELINEATOR POSTS. PLACE 3 POSTS EQUIDISTANT AROUND AND OUTSIDE ROOT BALL. SECURE TREE TO POSTS WITH 16" LONG POLYPROPYLENE OR POLYETHYLENE, 40 MIL., 1.5" WIDE STRAP. TREE WRAP MATERIAL FROM GROUNDLINE UPWARD TO FIRST BRANCHES, AS REQUIRED. PLACE MULCH, DEPTH AS SPECIFIED, OVER PLANT PITS — DO NOT PILE AGAINST TRUNK. FORM 3" DEEP WATERING BASIN. BACKFILL PLANT PIT WITH SPECIFIED BACKFILL SOIL. SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF HOLE. REFER TO AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK FOR MINIMUM BALL SIZE. ROOT FLARE TO BE PLANTED AT OR NEAR FINISHED GROUNDLINE. SET ROOT BALL ON UNDISTURBED SUBSOIL OR COMPACTED SOIL MOUND MATCHING TREES NATURAL GROUNDLINE WITH FINISHED SITE GRADE. N.T.S. LAST REVISED: 06/05/13 LA28 Prepared for: EVERGREEN TREE PLANTING PRUNE OUT MISDIRECTED BRANCHES. PROVIDE ONE CENTRAL LEADER. GUYING AND STAKING, (OPTIONAL) FOR ONE (1) YEAR ON ALL DECIDUOUS AND CONIFEROUS TREES: TOP STAKES 5' ABOVE GROUND (MAX.) OR TO FIRST BRANCH. BOTTOM OF STAKE 3' (MIN.) BELOW GROUND. STAKING POSTS TO BE 2"X2" STAINED WOOD OR PAINTED STEEL DELINEATOR POSTS. PLACE 3 POSTS EQUIDISTANT AROUND AND OUTSIDE ROOT BALL. SECURE TREE TO POSTS WITH 16" LONG POLYPROPYLENE OR POLYETHYLENE, 40 MIL., 1.5" WIDE STRAP. PLACE MULCH, DEPTH AS SPECIFIED, OVER PLANT PITS — DO NOT PILE AGAINST TRUNK. FORM 3" DEEP WATERING BASIN. BACKFILL PLANT PIT WITH SPECIFIED BACKFILL SOIL. SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF HOLE. REFER TO AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK FOR MINIMUM BALL SIZE. ROOT FLARE TO BE PLANTED AT OR NEAR FINISHED GROUNDLINE. SET ROOT BALL ON UNDISTURBED SUBSOIL OR COMPACTED SOIL MOUND MATCHING TREES NATURAL GROUNDLINE WITH FINISHED SITE GRADE. N.T.S. LAST REVISED: 06/05/13 LA29 Paxmar 3495 Northdale Blvd. NW Suite 210 Coon Rapids, Minnesota 55448 Planting Notes 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT COMMON GROUND ALLIANCE AT 811 OR CALL811.COM TO VERIFY LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY PLANTS OR LANDSCAPE MATERIAL. 2. ACTUAL LOCATION OF PLANT MATERIAL IS SUBJECT TO FIELD AND SITE CONDITIONS. 3. NO PLANTING WILL BE INSTALLED UNTIL ALL GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION HAS BEEN COMPLETED IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA. 4. ALL SUBSTITUTIONS MUST BE APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO SUBMISSION OF ANY BID AND/OR QUOTE BY THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ONE YEAR GUARANTEE OF ALL PLANT MATERIALS. THE GUARANTEE BEGINS ON THE DATE OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S OR OWNER'S WRITTEN ACCEPTANCE OF THE INITIAL PLANTING. REPLACEMENT PLANT MATERIAL SHALL HAVE A ONE YEAR GUARANTEE COMMENCING UPON PLANTING. 6. ALL PLANTS TO BE SPECIMEN GRADE, MINNESOTA—GROWN AND/OR HARDY. SPECIMEN GRADE SHALL ADHERE TO, BUT IS NOT LIMITED BY, THE FOLLOWING STANDARDS: ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM DISEASE, PESTS, WOUNDS, SCARS, ETC. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM NOTICEABLE GAPS, HOLES, OR DEFORMITIES. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM BROKEN OR DEAD BRANCHES. ALL PLANTS SHALL HAVE HEAVY, HEALTHY BRANCHING AND LEAFING. CONIFEROUS TREES SHALL HAVE AN ESTABLISHED MAIN LEADER AND A HEIGHT TO WIDTH RATIO OF NO LESS THAN 5:3. 7. PLANTS TO MEET AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK (ANSI Z60.1-2014 OR MOST CURRENT VERSION) REQUIREMENTS FOR SIZE AND TYPE SPECIFIED. 8. PLANTS TO BE INSTALLED AS PER MNLA & ANSI STANDARD PLANTING PRACTICES. 9. PLANTS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY PLANTED UPON ARRIVAL AT SITE. PROPERLY HEEL—IN MATERIALS IF NECESSARY; TEMPORARY ONLY. 10. PRIOR TO PLANTING, FIELD VERIFY THAT THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR IS LOCATED AT THE TOP OF THE BALLED & BURLAP TREE. IF THIS IS NOT THE CASE, SOIL SHALL BE REMOVED DOWN TO THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR. WHEN THE BALLED & BURLAP TREE IS PLANTED, THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR SHALL BE EVEN OR SLIGHTLY ABOVE FINISHED GRADE. 11. REMOVE POT ON POTTED PLANTS; SPLIT AND BREAK APART PEAT POTS. 12. PRUNE PLANTS AS NECESSARY — PER STANDARD NURSERY PRACTICE AND TO CORRECT POOR BRANCHING OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED TREES. 13. WRAP ALL SMOOTH—BARKED TREES — FASTEN TOP AND BOTTOM. REMOVE BY APRIL 1ST. 14. STAKING OF TREES AS REQUIRED; REPOSITION, PLUMB AND STAKE IF NOT PLUMB AFTER ONE YEAR. 15. THE NEED FOR SOIL AMENDMENTS SHALL BE DETERMINED UPON SITE SOIL CONDITIONS PRIOR TO PLANTING. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR THE NEED OF ANY SOIL AMENDMENTS. 16. BACKFILL SOIL AND TOPSOIL TO ADHERE TO MN/DOT STANDARD SPECIFICATION 3877 (COMMON TOPSOIL BORROW) AND TO BE EXISTING TOP SOIL FROM SITE FREE OF ROOTS, ROCKS LARGER THAN ONE INCH, SUBSOIL DEBRIS, AND LARGE WEEDS UNLESS SPECIFIED OTHERWISE. MINIMUM 4" DEPTH TOPSOIL FOR ALL LAWN GRASS AREAS AND 12" DEPTH TOPSOIL FOR TREE, SHRUBS, AND PERENNIALS. 17. MULCH TO BE AT ALL TREE, SHRUB, PERENNIAL, AND MAINTENANCE AREAS. TREE AND SHRUB PLANTING BEDS SHALL HAVE 4" DEPTH OF SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH. SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH TO BE USED AROUND ALL PLANTS WITHIN TURF AREAS. PERENNIAL AND ORNAMENTAL GRASS BEDS SHALL HAVE 2" DEPTH SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH. MULCH TO BE FREE OF DELETERIOUS MATERIAL AND COLORED RED, OR APPROVED EQUAL. MULCH AND FABRIC TO BE APPROVED BY OWNER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. MULCH TO MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS (WHERE APPLICABLE). 18. EDGING TO BE COMMERCIAL GRADE VALLEY—VIEW BLACK DIAMOND (OR EQUAL) POLY EDGING OR SPADED EDGE, AS INDICATED. POLY EDGING SHALL BE PLACED WITH SMOOTH CURVES AND STAKED WITH METAL SPIKES NO GREATER THAN 4 FOOT ON CENTER WITH BASE OF TOP BEAD AT GRADE, FOR MOWERS TO CUT ABOVE WITHOUT DAMAGE. UTILIZE CURBS AND SIDEWALKS FOR EDGING WHERE POSSIBLE. SPADED EDGE TO PROVIDE V—SHAPED DEPTH AND WIDTH TO CREATE SEPARATION BETWEEN MULCH AND GRASS. INDIVIDUAL TREE, SHRUB, OR RAIN—GARDEN BEDS TO BE SPADED EDGE, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. EDGING TO MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS (WHERE APPLICABLE). 19. ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE SODDED OR SEEDED, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SOD TO BE STANDARD MINNESOTA GROWN AND HARDY BLUEGRASS MIX, FREE OF LAWN WEEDS. ALL TOPSOIL AREAS TO BE RAKED TO REMOVE DEBRIS AND ENSURE DRAINAGE. SLOPES OF 3:1 OR GREATER SHALL BE STAKED. SEED AS SPECIFIED AND PER MN/DOT SPECIFICATIONS. IF NOT INDICATED ON LANDSCAPE PLAN, SEE EROSION CONTROL PLAN. 20. PROVIDE IRRIGATION TO ALL PLANTED AREAS ON SITE. IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO BE DESIGN/BUILD BY LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE SHOP DRAWINGS TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF IRRIGATION SYSTEM. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE OPERATION MANUALS, AS—BUILT PLANS, AND NORMAL PROGRAMMING. SYSTEM SHALL BE WINTERIZED AND HAVE SPRING STARTUP DURING FIRST YEAR OF OPERATION. SYSTEM SHALL HAVE ONE—YEAR WARRANTY ON ALL PARTS AND LABOR. ALL INFORMATION ABOUT INSTALLATION AND SCHEDULING CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR. 21. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE NECESSARY WATERING OF PLANT MATERIALS UNTIL THE PLANT IS FULLY ESTABLISHED OR IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS OPERATIONAL. OWNER WILL NOT PROVIDE WATER FOR CONTRACTOR. 22. REPAIR, REPLACE, OR PROVIDE SOD/SEED AS REQUIRED FOR ANY ROADWAY BOULEVARD AREAS ADJACENT TO THE SITE DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION. 23. REPAIR ALL DAMAGE TO PROPERTY FROM PLANTING OPERATIONS AT NO COST TO OWNER. Carlisle Village 6th Addition Monticello, Minnesota I N WMMI 0' 50' 100' 150' Call 48 Hours before digging: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Twin City Area 651-454-0002 Mn. Toll Free 1-800-252-1166 0008210PLF01.dwg Date: 06/12/17 sheet: 7 OF 7 Landscape Plan 7b t 'k t n.• +�w 1y ! S. �, +. , i • r hR � Y0. M" JI c • er" r a. f Room *r. w , 0. `#??i�'a s • fR. Ty � •.r tr, 1 r. 4 * 1 ao F �• •`V .r `•`alar. tl` i r t n '�ra'� 4 .• f, l�' .r • � f arm. 1 •'^s fr,k ^,i� "�►.. 6 J•f•!� �• Jf, r� S, • 'y�l• ao F �• •`V .r `•`alar. tl` t> � r arm. 1 •'^s fr,k ^,i� "�►.. 6 J•f•!� �• Jf, r� S, • 'y�l• * •� •# %lo � � w�*�ihr� : •y�. �k w� Mi M060- �► ��,.�',. �� .its.. yz • YJ • -- -� ,, .:+.ate+„ 0 WSB Building a legacy — your legacy. August 25, 2017 Ms. Angela Schumann Community Development Director City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1 Monticello, MN 55362 Re: Carlisle Village 6th Addition PUD Plan Review City Project No. 2017-012 WS13 Project No. 010663-000 Dear Ms. Schumann: 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763-541-4800 Fax: 763-541-1700 We have reviewed the concept plan received on August 8, 2017 as prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc. and offer the following comments. 1. There are four sanitary sewer and water services proposed to be abandoned. The sewer services can be left as is assuming they are plugged. The water services to be abandoned shall consist of the following work: • Close the corporation connection at the mainline watermain in the street • Remove the standpipe in the boulevard and install a copper plug • The limits of the street removal and replacement shall be verified in the field 2. The City utility superintendent has marked all the existing sewer and water services. The applicant shall verify that the plans reflect the marked locations. 3. The existing and proposed water service depths shall be measured in the field to ensure a minimum 7.5 feet of cover. Insulation should be installed if the existing services do not have a minimum 7.5 feet of cover. 4. A utility excavation permit must be obtained from the Public Works department prior to commencement of utility connections. 5. Provide drainage swales, where applicable, around the buildings to meet the minimum 2% grades and label the grades on the grading plan as such. 6. Identify the lowest opening elevation for each building if different than the ground grade elevation noted. Verify that the each building's lowest opening elevation is a minimum 1 -foot below the EOF. Equal Opportunity Employer wsbeng.com K:\010663-000\Admin\Docs\LTR-a-schumann-Carlisle 6th PUD 082517.docz August 24, 2017 Page 2 7. Show the proposed drainage and utility easements on the preliminary plat more clearly. 8. We would consider the proposed development part of a Common Plan of Development per MPCA requirements. Since the proposed development is adding than 1 acre of new impervious surface, volume control (infiltration) will not be required. A SWPPP shall be provided with the final stage documents. 9. It is recommended that the applicant coordinate with the private utility companies serving the development to identify if there are impacts or relocations needed to these facilities. 10. The applicant should demonstrate how all utility services, public and private (i.e. gas, phone, electric), will serve each home given the limited space between each proposed home. This may be an issue if the utilities will extend along the side yard. Adequate space should be provided to repair these services if there ever is a need. Please have the applicant provide a written response addressing the comments above. Final PUD plans will need to be submitted, reviewed, and approved prior to building permit approval. Please give me a call at 763-271-3236 if you have any questions or comments regarding this letter. Thank you. Sincerely, WSB & Associates, Inc. Shibani K. Bisson, PE City Engineer cc: Steve Grittman, NAC Enclosure skb K:\010663-000\Admin\Docs\LTR-a-schumann-Carlisle 6th PUD 082517.docz Archived: Thursday, September 21, 2017 1:54:59 PM From: Jon Morphew Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2017 10:39:33 AM To: Brian Stumpf, Lloyd Hilgart; Jim Davidson; Bill Fair; Charlotte Gabler Cc: Jeff O'Neill; Angela Schumann; Subject: Paxmar Carlisle Village Amended CUP Request Importance: Normal Attachments: Carlisle Village Petition.pdf ; Dear Mayor Stumpf, Council Member Gabler, Council Member Hilgart, Council Member Fair and Council Member Davidson --As you may be aware, I started a petition seeking neighborhood support to oppose Paxmar, LLC's request to amend its Conditional Use Permit to allow it to build detached townhomes in Carlisle Village. I have only promoted that petition to my neighbors living in Carlisle Village and the support has been overwhelming. In the ten days since I started the petition, it has been signed by 79 people who oppose Paxmar's plans to build the detached townhomes. I have attached to this email a copy of that petition. I think this is evidence that the persons who will be most impacted by Paxmar's proposed plans oppose that request. It was my intention to present this petition at the City Council meeting during which Paxamr's request would be considered. Unfortunately, I will not be able to attend the September 25th meeting as I will be on vacation next week. As a result of this, I wanted to provide you with this information at this time. Based upon my prior emails to you and the results of this petition, I reiterate my request that you deny Paxmar's request to amend its Conditional Use Permit for Carlisle Village. In the meantime, if you have any questions regarding this information or wish to discuss this matter further, please do not hesitate to contact me at your earliest convenience. Sincerely, Jon W. Morphew 8586 Gatewater Drive 9/20/2017 Petition - Monticello City Council: Oppose the Proposed Inferior Townhomes in Carlisle Village - Change.org Petitioning Monticello Citv Council Llovd Hilaert and 4 others Oppose the Proposed Inferior Townhomes in Carlisle Village Jon Morr)hew United States 79 Supporters As many of you know, Paxmar, LLC, is seeking to amend its Conditional Use Permit ("CUP") to allow it to build detached townhomes in Carlisle Village. Many of us are opposed to this request, so I thought an online petition from the residents of Carlisle Village would be a good way to express our opposition to the Monticello City Council. If you know of residents that are not members of the Carlisle Village Facebook group, please forward the link to this online petition to them via email. For those of you not aware of this proposed project, my opposition to the request for the amendment to the CUP is based upon the following: 1. 1 do not like that the representatives of Paxmar are attempting to blackmail the City by threatening to go ahead with building attached townhomes if the City does not agree to amend the CUP. That threat is based upon the presumption that the proposed detached townhomes are somehow better and/or more https://www.change.org/p/monticello-city-council-oppose-the-proposed-inferior-townhomes-in-carlisle-village 1/3 9/20/2017 Petition - Monticello City Council: Oppose the Proposed Inferior Townhomes in Carlisle Village - Change.org valuable than the attached townhomes that are allowed within Carlisle Village. The fallacy of that position will be addressed later in this petition. Paxmar's rationale for seeking the amendment to the CUP is based upon the fact that it will make higher profits off of the detached townhomes than the attached townhomes. If Paxmar could make just as much, or more, money off of building attached townhomes it would already being so. However, Paxmar knows it has a higher profit margin off of these cheap detached homes and that is why it wants to amend the CUP. 2. At first blush, Paxmar's proposal might seem like a good idea in that most people think detached homes are generally better than attached townhomes. However, that is not the case with the plans being put forth by Paxmar. Paxmar is proposing to be allowed to build smaller homes on smaller lots (with less setbacks) that will be much less valuable than the homes in the rest of the Carlisle Village neighborhood. These proposed homes will be sold for even less than the attached townhomes that already exist on Gatewater Circle. My understanding is that the proposed homes will sell in the range of $175-195,000. (The attached townhomes in Carlisle Village are currently selling in the $200,000+ range.) Paxmar's proposed homes will have the net effect of driving down the property values of all the homes (attached townhomes and single family homes) in Carlisle Village because there will be newer homes in the neighborhood that will be selling for much less than what homes are currently worth in that neighborhood. 3. Another issue is that the proposed detached homes will not have an association responsible for the exterior maintenance on those homes like there is for the attached townhomes in the neighborhood. This means those less valuable and less attractive homes will be subjected to less maintenance and oversight than regular attached townhomes. 4. The three models of homes proposed by Paxmar are not in character with the rest of the Carlisle Village neighborhood. It is my understanding that Carlisle Village was developed to be a higher -end neighborhood to attract families to stay in Monticello than moving to other neighboring cities. The three styles of homes do not meet the characteristics of the existing homes in Carlisle Village. They are not even as nice as the existing townhomes in Carlisle Village. The proposed homes are much smaller and do not have front porches or similar finishing https://www.change.org/p/monticello-city-council-oppose-the-proposed-inferior-townhomes-in-carlisle-village 2/3 9/20/2017 Petition - Monticello City Council: Oppose the Proposed Inferior Townhomes in Carlisle Village - Change.org touches as the existing homes. One of the three proposed models does not even have a front door, but has a side entrance. That is completely out of character with the rest of the neighborhood. 5. The small amount of property taxes that will be generated by Paxmar's proposed homes do not justify the loss of property values to the remainder of the homes in Carlisle Village. 6. 1 think Paxmar is setting their sights too low with these detached townhomes. It is my belief that the market is demanding nicer homes than what Paxmar is proposing. If Paxmar cannot deliver those kinds of homes, it should either be building attached townhomes like the ones that already exist in Carlisle Village or it should sell the land to another developer that can bring higher -end detached townhomes to the City. Paxmar's only interest is maximizing their profit at the expense of the property values in Carlise Village. For these reasons, I urge you to sign this online petition and urge the City Council to deny Paxmar's request to amend its CUP for Carlisle Village when that matter comes before the City Council. Jon W. Morphew https://www.change.org/p/monticello-city-council-oppose-the-proposed-inferior-townhomes-in-carlisle-village 3/3 City Council Agenda: 9/25/17 4C. Consideration of approving an amendment to the Monticello Comprehensive Plan by adopting of the Downtown Small Area Plan. Applicant: Citv of Monticello (AS) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The City Council is asked to review for adoption the Downtown Small Area Plan and corresponding amendments to the Monticello Comprehensive Plan, which if adopted, will become the guide plan for the Monticello's Downtown. In 2010, the City of Monticello completed a guide to redeveloping downtown called the "Embracing Downtown Plan". The plan considered land use, transportation and market realities for the area considered to be "Downtown Monticello", or the "CCD" as designated by the Monticello Zoning Ordinance. Since the adoption of the Embracing Downtown Plan, changes in the retail marketplace, as well as an understanding of more recent investments in downtown and the challenges present in implementing the Embracing Downtown Plan, have impacted the desire and ability to implement the Embracing Downtown Plan as it was originally intended. Therefore, the City of Monticello Economic Development Authority (EDA) authorized an update to the Embracing Downtown Plan, focusing on the core downtown area. The study goals included: • Development of a revised land use plan for the core area of the downtown which presents a greater likelihood for realization. • Examination of current market conditions impacting the feasibility of realization of goals for downtown. • Celebrate, strengthen and leverage the authenticity of Downton Monticello, its unique position in the region, and its existing amenities. • Encourage investment with a plan that focuses on practical solutions and existing market potential. The Monticello EDA funded the study, selecting the Cuningham Group and Tangible Solutions as the consulting group to prepare the plan. Work on the plan began in early 2017, and the plan has evolved over the last nine months with significant public engagement through the guidance of a project steering committee and public feedback via open meetings and comment/feedback opportunities. In addition, a joint workshop involving the EDA, City Council, Planning Commission and Parks Commission was held in late May and an additional follow-up joint workshop of the EDA and Planning Commission was also held on July 12, 2017 further addressing public concerns and comments, as well as the ultimate feasibility of the Plan. The Cuningham Group has since made additional changes to the Plan to address the concerns expressed at the workshop and through public comment received. While the focus of the plan is on the core blocks of the downtown, the final draft plan provides a land use, transportation and parks and open space framework for the full downtown or "CCD" area. The Downtown Small Area Study therefore serves as an update to the 2010 Embracing Downtown Plan. In terms of the comprehensive plan adoption framework proposed, the Downtown Small Area Plan itself will become an appendix document to the Comprehensive Plan, including its reports on Market Context and Retail Vitality. Goal, policy and recommendation statements from the document are proposed for incorporation into the text of the Comprehensive Plan's Chapter 3 — Land Use and Chapter 4 — Economic Development for the Downtown. While the Downtown Small Area Plan will replace the Embracing Downtown Plan as an appendix to the Comprehensive Plan, similar to the 1997 Downtown Plan, the Embracing Downtown Plan serves as a guidepost reference in time for the downtown and continues to be referenced in the Comprehensive Plan. At this time, staff is asking the Planning Commission to consider formal recommendation for adoption of the Downtown Small Area Plan as an amendment to the 2008 Comprehensive Plan. Andrew Dresdner, Cuningham Group, will be in attendance at the meeting to present the plan in summary format to the City Council. B. BOARD REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATION The Monticello Parks Commission reviewed a draft of the Downtown Small Area Plan on March 23rd of this year, recommending approval unanimously based on the information reflected for the parks and pathways. The Monticello Economic Development Authority reviewed the plan on August 91h, 2017 and recommended its adoption and accepted the work product represented by the plan. The EDA did recommend some minor modifications to the draft presented at that time. The EDA's recommended changes, including an adjustment in the text of the document "encourage" rather than "require" throughout, have been made and are incorporated into the version presented to the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed plan and corresponding Comprehensive Plan amendments on September 5th, 2017. Members of the public were present to address the Commission regarding the plan. Shawn Grady, owner of Ace Hardware in the downtown, indicated that he still has concerns with parking in the downtown as it is discussed in the plan. He indicated that the plan includes high density housing in current parking areas, which puts pressure on the private parking areas. He also noted that the underground parking concept is expensive to build and may not be as convenient as surface parking. He stressed the need for visitor parking for 2 housing. Mr. Grady explained that shared parking will need to be considered carefully. Mr. Grady noted that future plans also need to be explained, as some may think that new buildings shown on the plan are immediate. Councilmember Gabler noted that policymakers and staff need to be able to communicate that the plan is a long-term vision. John Murray, co-owner of Lucy Murray's Dance Studio in downtown, spoke to the Commission. Mr. Murray stated that he did see changes in the most recent draft which addressed some of his concerns, which were expressed at the Joint Planning Commission and EDA meeting held earlier. Mr. Murray stated that the largest concern is traffic on Broadway and making sure that people can cross safely. He stated that he is pleased to see that the plan tries to address the issue through improvements to the Walnut and Broadway intersection. Mr. Murray encouraged flexibility and to look at development as it occurs to address safety and parking. To help address the traffic issue, Andrew Dresdner encouraged gateway elements at Pine and Locust as shown in the plan to help cure visitors and travelers in to the fact that they are entering the downtown space. He also noted that the plan emphasizes keeping traffic lanes at minimum, and even shifting the one lane westbound on Broadway further west. Councilmember Gabler clarified that amendments to the zoning will be needed to support the implementation of the plan. Planning staff noted that amendments to the zoning ordinance would be necessary and parking would need to be part of those amendments. She noted perhaps a small group of property and business owners would help in that effort. Steve Johnson, owner of multiple properties in the downtown on Block 52, addressed the Commission. He noted that he was speaking to the Commission as a private property owner. Mr. Johnson complimented the project consultants, the Cuningham and Tangible groups, stating that the plan has a number of positive goals for the vision of downtown. Mr. Johnson stated that Monticello seems to be a mobile exurban community that is vehicle oriented, which he does not believe is addressed in the plan. Mr. Johnson referred to the current public parking lots, some of which were dedicated to the City from private property owners. Mr. Johnson stated that the plan seems prescriptive and underparked. He also expressed concerns about where parking is placed in the plan. He recommended considering PUD zoning to help ensure the plan meets needs and the vision. He further recommended the City consider implementing a specific parking ratio for the downtown. Andrew Dresdner commented that Wright County highway engineers have reviewed the proposed curb bump -outs for Walnut and Broadway and were supportive of that idea. He recommended that the City evaluate each development to evaluate parking, both quantitative and qualitative. Mr. Fyle confirmed with Councilmember Gabler that the plan process included a good amount of public review and revision to address comment. After discussion regarding the comments, the Planning Commission voted 5-0 to recommend adoption of the City of 3 Monticello Downtown Small Area Plan per their resolution, which included the proposed amendment to Chapters 3 and 4, as well as the plan documents as appendix items to the Comprehensive Plan. Al. Staff Impact: City staff have put many hours into the effort to support the Small Area Study/Plan for the Downtown. The work began last fall (2016) and continued through the winter into the summer of 2017. Staff worked to support the consultants, answer questions and provide background information and documents in support of their efforts. There have been a considerable number of meetings attended by various committee members along with staff. This type of collaboration and review of consultant work/tasks is part of the normal duties of staff involved in oversight of materials and work products performed by contractors. Additional staff time to support the implementation of the plan should be anticipated and will be discussed in the various future items for consideration which come before the Council. A2. Budget Impact: The contracted amount for completing the Small Area Study Plan is $50,000. This amount is included in the 2017 EDA budget under Miscellaneous Professional Services. The plan preparation and all deliverables and meeting coverage has been performed in line with the approved contract with Cuningham Group and Tangible Consulting. Implementation of the plan will require City resources, which will be discussed with each annual budget and CIP cycle, as well as individual action items for Council consideration. A3. Strategic Plan Impact: The adoption of a plan for the Downtown supports the following strategic goals and objectives as described below. • Create and preserve sustainable livability — the plan supports reinvestment in the existing business landscape and development of new housing in support of the downtown as a sustainable community asset. • Build a connected community — the plan provides suggestions for improving the transportation grid and completing links in the pathway system in recognition that the downtown is both the historic center and crossroads for Monticello. • Strengthen our image as a destination — the plan suggests a downtown that is vibrant throughout the day and week with events and activities that draw people into the area from the community and beyond. • Support a vibrant economy — encouraging the economic success of existing and new business and housing through redevelopment and revitalization strategies focus on the downtown • Invest in people — support the health of the community through improved walkability and bikability, enhanced recreation opportunities and creation of new 4 employment opportunities. C. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to adopt amendments to the Monticello Comprehensive Plan for adoption the City of Monticello Downtown Small Area Plan, based on findings in Resolution 2017-70 2. Motion to adopt amendments to the Monticello Comprehensive Plan for adoption the City of Monticello Downtown Small Area Plan, based on findings in Resolution 2017 -with modifications identified by the City Council, based on findings in Resolution 2017-70 3. Motion to table consideration of adoption of amendments to the Monticello Comprehensive Plan for adoption of the City of Monticello Downtown Small Area Plan for information to be specified by the City Council. 4. Motion of other. D. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the Downtown Small Area Plan and companion text amendments to the Comprehensive Plan. Staff believes that the plan meets the vision and goals for a successful framework supporting the redevelopment and repositioning of the downtown core area. The Plan provides a vision and implementation strategy for Downtown which includes both public and private investments scalable in small, medium and large projects, which can be accomplished in increments over time. It also reinforces the vision for additional housing in the downtown core and provides a land use framework for dense retail, entertainment and personal service uses. The Plan contains strategies to enhance the core as a vibrant, walkable district that is intended for use by many. It also suggests enhanced parks, public space, pathway and signage improvements for ease of wayfinding. The Plan supports building on existing assets through reinvestment while distinguishing itself from the previous Embracing Downtown Plan (2010) which sought to create a more suburban style, automobile dependent development pattern in the core area. E. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Resolution 2017-70 B. Resolution PC -2017-028 C. Draft Downtown Small Area Plan, dated August 24th, 2017, including 1. Plan Document 2. Market Context 3. Retail Vitality D. Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments 1. Chapter 3 — Land Use 2. Chapter 4 — Economic Development E. Comprehensive Plan - Current, Excerpts 1. Chapter 3 — Land Use 2. Chapter 4 — Economic Development 6 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2017-70 ADOPTION OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO DOWNTOWN SMALL AREA PLAN AS AN AMENDMENT TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR THE CITY OF MONTICELLO WHEREAS, the City of Monticello has, in 2008, adopted a Comprehensive Plan guiding the growth, development, land use, and infrastructure planning for the City; and WHEREAS, said Comprehensive Plan provides for the development and redevelopment of the downtown as a part of such guidance; and WHEREAS, the City last completed a specific planning effort for its core downtown area in 1997 and 2011; and WHEREAS, the City has found that a revised and detailed plan for its downtown would be consistent with both City objectives and the purposes of the Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, as part of updated planning efforts for the downtown, the City engaged the services of Tangible Solutions to complete a market analysis for the downtown; and WHEREAS, as part of updated planning efforts for the downtown, the City engaged the services of Cuningham Group to analyze land use and design opportunities in downtown, and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello has reviewed the proposed plan for Downtown, the "City of Monticello Downtown Small Area Plan", in joint workshops with the City Council, Parks Commission and Economic Development Authority on May 31St, 2017 and with the Economic Development Authority on July 12th, 2017; and WHEREAS, the Parks Commission has recommended approval of the City of Monticello Downtown Small Area Plan on March 23rd, 2017; and WHEREAS, the Monticello Economic Development Authority has recommended approval of the City of Monticello Downtown Small Area Plan on August 9th, 2017; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello has held a public hearing on September 5th, 2017 to consider the Downtown Small Area Plan and corresponding amendments, and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered all of the comments and the staff report for the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments and Downtown Small Area Plan, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the need for adoption of an updated downtown plan: 1. The 2017 Downtown Small Area Plan recognizes downtown as a unique commercial district that is the heart of the community and part of Monticello's heritage and identity, and provides a guide for development, redevelopment, and revitalization in downtown Monticello. 2. The Downtown Small Area Plan update was accomplished through engagement and public participation by City, downtown landowners, business owners, citizens, stakeholders, and policy makers. 3. The Downtown Small Area Plan seeks to retain Broadway as Monticello's Main Street, supporting existing businesses, improving connections to and relationship with the River, and creating new downtown housing opportunities along Walnut and Cedar Streets for existing and new Monticello residents. 4. The Downtown Small Area Plan envisions a downtown that serves many purposes for many people — including dining, recreation, celebrating, gathering, shopping and living. 5. The updated plan includes an implementation section to further assist in achieving the vision. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota: Pursuant to Minn. Stat. §462.355, the Monticello City Council adopts the amendment to Chapter 3 and Chapter 4 of the Comprehensive Plan, including the following: The document entitled "City of Monticello Downtown Small Area Plan", dated August 24th, 2017, along with recommendations specified, and with the "Market Context" and "Retail Vitality" studies, which are attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "A" 2. The amendments entitled "Chapter 3 - Land Use" for the existing Comprehensive Plan Chapter 3, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B". 3. The amendments entitled "Chapter 4 —Economic Development" for the existing Comprehensive Plan Chapter 4, which is attached hereto and incorporated as Exhibit «C„ ADOPTED this 25th day of September, 2017, by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Brian Stumpf, Mayor ATTEST: Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator EXHIBIT "A" Attach Final Downtown Small Area Plan (refer to file records for full copy) EXHIBIT "B" Attach Final Comprehensive Plan Amendment Text Chapter 3 — Land Use EXHIBIT "B" Attach Final Comprehensive Plan Amendment Text Chapter 4 — Economic Development CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2017-028 RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO DOWNTOWN SMALL AREA PLAN AS AN AMENDMENT TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR THE CITY OF MONTICELLO WHEREAS, the City of Monticello has, in 2008, adopted a Comprehensive Plan guiding the growth, development, land use, and infrastructure planning for the City; and WHEREAS, said Comprehensive Plan provides for the development and redevelopment of the downtown as a part of such guidance; and WHEREAS, the City last completed a specific planning effort for its core downtown area in 1997 and 2011; and WHEREAS, the City has found that a revised and detailed plan for its downtown would be consistent with both City objectives and the purposes of the Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, as part of updated planning efforts for the downtown, the City engaged the services of Tangible Solutions to complete a market analysis of downtown; and WHEREAS, as part of updated planning efforts for the downtown, the City engaged the services of Cuningham Group to analyze land use and design opportunities in downtown, and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello has reviewed the proposed plan for Downtown, the "City of Monticello Downtown Small Area Plan", in joint workshops with the City Council, Parks Commission and Economic Development Authority on May 31St, 2017 and with the Economic Development Authority on July 12th, 2017; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello has held a public hearing on September 5"', 2017 to consider the Downtown Small Area Plan and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report and exhibits, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following additional Findings of Fact in relation to the need for adoption of an updated downtown plan: 1. The 2017 Downtown Small Area Plan recognizes downtown as a unique commercial district that is the heart of the community and part of Monticello's heritage and identity, and provides a guide for development, redevelopment, and revitalization in downtown Monticello. 2. The Downtown Small Area Plan update was accomplished through engagement and public participation by City, downtown landowners, business owners, citizens, stakeholders, and policy makers. 3. The Downtown Small Area Plan seeks to retain Broadway as Monticello's Main Street, supporting existing businesses, improving connections to and relationship with the River, and creating new downtown housing opportunities along Walnut and Cedar Streets for existing and new Monticello residents. 4. The Downtown Small Area Plan envisions a downtown that serves many purposes for many people — including dining, recreation, celebrating, gathering, shopping and living. 5. The updated plan includes an implementation section to further assist in achieving the vision. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota: Pursuant to Minn. Stat. §462.355, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello recommends that the Monticello City Council adopt the amendment to Chapter 3 and Chapter 4 of the Comprehensive Plan, including the following: The document entitled "City of Monticello Downtown Small Area Plan", dated August 24th, 2017, along with recommendations specified, and with the "Market Context" and "Retail Vitality" studies, which are attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit ..A.. 2. The amendments entitled "Chapter 3 - Land Use" for the existing Comprehensive Plan Chapter 3, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B". 3. The amendments entitled "Chapter 4 —Economic Development" for the existing Comprehensive Plan Chapter 4, which is attached hereto and incorporated as Exhibit "C". ADOPTED this 5th day of September, 2017, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. CIT ATTEST: Angela S mmunity Development Director EXHIBIT "A" Attach Final Downtown Snnnafll Area ]flan (refer to file records for full copy) EXHIBIT "B" Attach Final Comprehensive Plan Amendment Text Chapter 3 — Land Use EXHIBIT "B" Attach Final Comprehensive Plan Amendment Text Chapter 4 — Economic Development City of Monticello Downtown Small Area Plan IV,., ,.,..:Ilo, MN August 24, 2017 Prepared for: The City of Monticello Prepared by: Cuningham Group Architecture, Inc. CUNINGHAM 6 R D V P Acknowledgements City Council Brian Stumpf, Mayor Jim Davidson Bill Fair Charlotte Gabler Lloyd Hilgart Parks Commission Jack Gregor Nancy McCaffrey (Vice Chair) Larry Nolan (Chair) Tim Stalpes Brian Stoll Bill Fair, Council Liaison Planning Commission Brad Fyle, Chair John Alstad Sam Murdoff Marc Simpson Lucas Wynne Charlotte Gabler (Council Lioison) Consultant Team Cuningham Group Tangible consulting Services Economic Development Authority Bill Demeules, President Bill Tapper, Vice President Steve Johnson, Treasurer Jim Davidson, Council Representative Lloyd Hilgart, Council Representative Tracy Hinz Jon Morphew Steering Committee Charlotte Gabler Jim Davidson Tracy Hinz Steve Johnson Marc Simpson Don Roberts Larry Nolan Marcy Anderson Tom Turner John and Lucy Murray Table of Contents Executive Summary Background and Purpose Character Areas, .............................. Frameworks....... ........................ . Background Demographics............................................................ Market and Development Context..... RetailVitality............................................................... Physical Analysis....................................................... Public Process Goals and Objectives Project Goals ........................... Character Areas 12 CharacterAreas: Purpose..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................14 Character Areas: Riverfront ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 15 CharacterAreas: Broadway.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................16 Character Areas: Walnut and Cedar Street ............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 18 Character Areas: Pine Street 20 Block 52 an 34 Block34.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................23 Block52.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................24 Frameworks Frameworks: Purpose. .. .......26 Frameworks: Land Use and Development......................................................................................................................................................................................................................27 Frameworks: Circulation and Access ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 28 Frameworks: Parks and Open Spaces ..... .......... ..........29 Implementation Implementation........... .........31 Executive Summary Background and Purpose The purpose of this Plan is to attract and direct investments on the core blocks of Downtown Monticello, MN over the next 10 years. The Plan advocates for solidifying Downtown as the heart of the community with a series of coordinated public and private investments. Together, these investments will create a human -scaled environment that encourages gathering, socializing, visiting and enjoying on a daily basis - throughout the year. The improvements outlined in this Plan aim to build on the unique qualities of Monticello to make the Downtown yet more attractive to those who have chosen to live and do business in the community. Specifically, the Plan seeks to promote Broadway Street as a storefront district with restaurants and specialty retail, celebrate the River for its recreational, connective and economic qualities, reinvigorate a downtown housing market with multiple, appropriately scaled, infill projects, and improve the experience of Pine Street for all users. The plan is ambitious, but achievable. Over time and upon completion, the plan would usher in up to 500 new units of downtown housing, new restaurants overlooking the river, and unique retail and services on Broadway. Momentum can be established in the next few years. Primary projects to be completed within five years include: redevelopment of Block 52, Walnut Street connection to River Street and infill housing on Walnut Street. Implementation of this Plan will create two legacies. The first will be a revitalized Downtown with an economy and attractions that benefit all residents of Monticello. Equally important, however to the physical improvements described above will be the legacy of new partnerships and civic cooperation that are essential to and will result from coordinated actions. The ideas set forth in this Plan come from the vested interest of the Monticello community through a broad public outreach effort. The realization of these ideas rely on a coordinated, cooperative, and active public sector working in tandem with an entrepreneurial private sector The result will be a lively Downtown for all in Monticello, a place that embodies both its history and future aspirations. Goals M 000 000 000 � 000°000 F n F m nfl 71111 000 �00� II III n� Improve Pine Street for All Users Shift the Center of Town to Walnut and Encourage Small and Medium Scaled Become a River Town Broadway Investments City of Monticello Downtown Small Area Plan I Executive Summary 0 Downtown is For Everyone Downtown Monticello is and shall remain the heart of the community. It is the birthplace of the City and the focus of civic activity. This Plan builds off those foundational qualities with a clear vision for the future of the core blocks of Downtown. The vision includes a commitment to retaining Broadway as Monticello's Main Street, supporting existing businesses, improving connections to and relationship with the River, and creating new downtown housing opportunities along Walnut and Cedar Avenues for existing and new Monticello residents. The Plan envisions a Downtown that is lively throughout the day and into the evening, 12 months of the year. A downtown that serves many purposes for many people - including dining, recreation, celebrating, gathering, shopping and living. Illustrative Master Plan The Plan above describes a potential long term build out of the core blocks of Downtown Monticello. Character Areas Similar to the Embracing Downtown Plan, the Plan divides the study area into four different character Areas. The purpose of this is to create sub -areas in downtown, each with its own identity and purpose and direction. The character areas are developed based on their context and their future role in the downtown. Typically each character area is a mix of uses, but also has a dominant use. 0 Character Area: Riverfront A redesigned Park with an amphitheater and better relationship to Downtown will help connect the River to Downtown Character Area: Walnut Street and Cedar Street Walnut and Cedar Streets will fill in with new housing (2-4 stories) that adds to the market strength of downtown and provides additional housing choices for new and existing residents of Monticello. Their intersections with Broadway will be improved to make it easier to walk to the Riverfront Character Area: Broadway Monticello's Main Street will transition over time from a street with primarily services, to one with unique retail and restaurants. t Character Area: Pine Street (TH 25) The community will reclaim Pine Street by maintaining it's width and adding pedestrian amenities and local serving commercial uses. City of Monticello Downtown Small Area Plan I Executive Summary 0 Frameworks Land Use, Open Space and Transportation are the three frameworks that organize and define the physical environment. As with systems in the human body, each must function independently - and together with - the others. If one fails, they all fail. This is why it is important to understand frameworks as individual systems that must function as part of a single Downtown. The Plan is also divided into frameworks in order to allow different agencies, departments, and investors act in concert with each other. This will help ensure public and private investments are coordinated, less risky, and more publicly acceptable. Framework: Open Space and Parks (Primary recommednations) • Improve Riverfront Parks to accommodate more programming and events • Redesign Walnut Street and River Street to allow for park extention during events • Convert vacant lots on Broadway to small pocket parks • Utilize River islands for additional natural park space • Create pedestrian refuges or enhanced building entry ways on the corners of blocks along Pine Street • Enliven open spaces with public art wherever possible Framework: Access and Circulation • Emphasize connectivity throughout the Core, with pedestrian and bike friendly streets, a complete sidewalk system, and connectivity to the in -town neighborhoods. • Promote a "complete streets" policy that balances the needs of all users in the Downtown. • Manage and improve the grid system to support connectivity and access throughout Downtown • Work with MnDOT to improve Pine Street for users of Downtown Monticello, including additional signals, maintaining the River Street signal and supporting an additional river crossing • Improve pedestrian crossings of Broadway at Walnut and Cedar to improve access to the Riverfront • Reconnect Walnut Street with River Street Framework: Development and Land Use • Riverfront District with destination restaurant and entertainment uses, as well as housing • Broadway District with shopfront retail and restaurant uses beneath housing and offices • In -town neighborhoods extend to Walnut and Cedar Street with new infill housing 2-4 stories (apartments and townhouses) additional recomendations are included in the Framewoirks Section pages 25-32 Open Space and Parks Access and Circulation Development and land Use Immediate Next Steps and Implementation 1. Improve the physical environment with streetscape, benches, programming, and art. 2. Bolster Broadway with a facade improvement program and retail recruitment. 3. Aggressively market development opportunities such as Block 52 and infill housing on Walnut and Cedar Street 4. Enact the appropriate policies, programs and incentives that enable the type of development described in the Plan. How is This Plan Related to the Embracing Downtown Plan and the Comprehensive Plan? In 2010, the City of Monticello completed the "Embracing Downtown Plan". The full area considered to be "Downtown Monticello"extends from Interstate I-94 to the Mississippi River, and generally from Cedar Street to Maple Street. The Embracing Downtown Plan was adopted as an appendix to the Comprehensive Plan. Changes in the retail marketplace overall, and more specifically market changes and reinvestments in downtown Monticello, have created a need to develop a new planning perspective for the core blocks of the downtown. This document therefore is an update to the 2008 Monticello Comprehensive Plan and to the Embracing Downtown Plan for the Downtown. This Plan will replace the Embracing Downtown plan as an appendix to the Comprehensive Plan. City of Monticello Downtown Small Area Plan I Executive Summary 0 CAN Background Demographics Introduction Monticello is a center of growth, and a local service center, for the surrounding areas. In recent years, Monticello's growth has largely come in the form of single family homes and apartment development at the edges of the City, and in surrounding areas, as well as retail development oriented to Interstate 94. This is true even though developable land exists in the heart of the downtown area. Downtown Monticello offers a distinctive environment for housing and retail development. The beautiful Mississippi River, with public parks along its banks, serves as the northern border of downtown. The River is only two blocks from the storefront district along Broadway Street, the historic center of town. Downtown is compact. The interstate highway is only 6 blocks to the south of Broadway Street, with a Cub Foods and other stores alongside it. The City's marquee public facilities—its community center and library—are only Demographics 120% 80% 40% Population Growth (2000-2015) three to four blocks south of Broadway Street. This is an unusually strong collection of attractive offerings within the walkable center of a small city. Downtown Monticello also has conditions that serve as deterrents to new development. The width of Pine Street, and the traffic it carries, serve to bisect the downtown into east and west downtown neighborhoods. Most Broadway Street buildings are occupied, but many of the buildings are business offices rather than stores or restaurants that serve walk-up customers. And some buildings and storefronts are in visible need of improvements. Parts of downtown are dominated by large surface parking lots, which give a sense of emptiness, and convey a lack of energy and activity. On balance, downtown Monticello has great promise for attracting development, and revitalizing its storefront retail, in ways that will build on its historic role as the heart of the City. $100,000 $80,000 $60,000 $40,000 $20,000 Median Household Income 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% B:y Luke The information on this page is summarized from a1 the companion documents - Demographics and Market -$ Context and Retail Vitality Study conducted by Tangible 4,286 5,294 a _ Consulting Services. This Monti -_-' report and can be downloaded on-line at 1,1.65 i � J Employment and Commuting Due to Monticello's location relative to the larger cities of St. Cloud and the Twin Cities, it's not surprising that many residents of Monticello work outside the city. Of the 6,459 employed residents of Monticello, 82% work outside of Monticello. Monticello is not just a bedroom community though. It offers roughly 5,400 jobs, and provides employment to around 4,300 people who live outside the city. Major employers include Xcel Energy and Cargill. Housing Unit by Tenure Housing Unit by Type loo°i° ' 80% 40% 20% mobile home and other ' apartment (> 10 units) ' apartment (< 10 units) ' townhouse/condominium single family home o t O v °y $ o v O ° o v O ° ,a m a o+ v w > p vo _ o v O ° g h rflo 3 y C� UJ J V c OO W Y V cC O W Y V CG C W O m V G C Vl Ol C C VI !0 Z Vl R 'C C CCO 7 ccC_ Housing Characteristics Population Growth: Median Household Income: Monticello has a more diverse range of housing options then many comparison cities. Just 54% of Monticello has experienced significant According to the US Census Bureau, the Monticello's housing units are single-family homes. It offers more townhomes, apartments, and mobile growth over the past years, attracting median household income in Monticello homes than other cities in Wright County. Nevertheless, there is a culture of homeownership. Around new households even through the course is $70,254. This is above the state average, 70% of Monticello households own their home—a high rate considering the diversity of housing types. of the recent economic recession. whose median income is $61,492. Homes are on the modest side, with an average value of about $160,000—a result which is influenced by the greater than average number of owner -occupied mobile homes and townhomes in Monticello. City of Monticello Small Area Plan I Character Areas Market and Development Context Residential Market The housing market context matters for the prospects of attracting new housing to Monticello's downtown. Similar to the housing market in the US at large, apartment rents have been rising in Monticello over the past five years, and the vacancy rate has declined—both of which are indicators of demand. However, average rents in early 2016, in existing apartment buildings tracked by Costar, were only around $1.00 per square foot. Rents of around $2.00 or more per square foot are needed to support new construction, in the absence of public subsidy. This high demand, low rent, scenario is common in small cities. It raises the question whether new housing will be able to achieve the rents it needs to support construction costs. In Monticello, this question has been partly answered by the development of Monticello Crossings, in the southeastern part of the City. Monticello Crossings is a market rate apartment development of 210 dwelling units, which has been built in two or three phases. The developer's expectations have been met by the development, in terms of meeting its rent and absorption targets. Tenants value the newer apartment product, which is not available elsewhere in Residential Market Context $1.10 $1.00 $.90 Average Multifamily Rent (psf) 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Monticello, and have been willing to pay rents that are significantly higher than the rents in the existing older apartment buildings. The success of this development is an indicator that new apartment development in downtown Monticello may also find a market—although the higher costs and risks associated with building downtown would probably mean that public financial support would be needed. Certain developers focus on new housing development in small city downtowns. We interviewed three such developers (along with two others with a different professional focus, but who have a deeper familiarity with Monticello), and they affirmed that downtown Monticello has many of the characteristics that they would look for in locating a new development. (please refer to The natural amenity of the river, and the Broadway Street storefront district, are particularly attractive features. They expressed skepticism about doing mixed use developments, with housing over retail, except in the strongest areas. They said they would look for a strong public partner—to participate financially in the project, and to support the density that would be required to make the project work. Vacancy Rate Multifamily Units 7% ............ 6% 5% 4% 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Apartment Construction A map of multifamily apartment buildings by age shows • 1964-1980 O 1991-2000 that many existing apartment buildings were built in the 1980s. Monticello Crossings is the only development that • 1981-1990 O 2001-2017 has occurred in the decade of the 2010s. The information on this page is summarized from the companion documents - Demographics and Market Context and Retail Vitality Study conducted by Tangible Consulting Services. This report and can be downloaded on-line at City of Monticello Small Area Plan I Character Areas Market and Development Context Retail Market Context The retail context is important for addressing key questions related to the ongoing viability of the Broadway Street storefront district, and how much additional retail development downtown would be supported. Retail vacancies over the past five years have been declining, which is a general indicator of market strength. However, average retail rents have been more or less holding steady, and there has not been a lot of new construction in recent years. National retail trends are concerning. Store closures, and struggling malls, are a frequent focus of news stories. Internet shopping is taking market share from bricks and mortar retail stores. However, in the long run the population of Monticello and surrounding areas have a lot of room to grow. That should more than offset national retail trends, and it should support a modestly expanded footprint of retail stores in downtown Monticello. The retail context map illustrates the competitive landscape for Monticello retail. It shows retail areas in neighboring cities, by the scale of retail property. Note that storefront districts such as Broadway Street attract customers by offering a different type of shopping environment than newer malls. Pedestrian oriented storefront districts, similar to the Broadway Street storefront district, are also noted on the retail context map. This research supports an expectation that the property frontage along Pine Street will continue to attract retail store development, over time, as property is ready for development or redevelopment. It also suggests that there is an adequate customer base to support the storefront district along Broadway Street, and that the storefront district could be expanded modestly. However, a large expansion of the storefront district would not be advisable. Retail vibrancy strategies, if pursued assertively and creatively, could greatly improve the condition and success of the storefront district. t _10 ker 1'4&v%n an cla I e Poll aple O ake Shopping Center Type D Strip Center O Neighborhood Center O Community Center O outlet Center D Power Center Sand 0Une-G State Forest a 0 Rami C M R� kford I�ontrase,,,� Average Retail Rent (psf) 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 10% 8% 6% 4% 2% Lel Retail Vacancy Rate 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 IW C The information on this page is summarized from the companion documents - Demographics and Market Context and Retail Vitality Study conducted by Tangible Consulting Services. This report and can be downloaded on-line at City of Monticello Small Area Plan I Character Areas Retail Vitality National Retail Trends and Context The retail landscape is changing rapidly. As lives get busier, people do more shopping online, and when they actually go out to shop people want an experience - it's about more than just purchasing a product. This sentiment was reflected throughout many public comments. However, traditional storefront -style retail areas still have something to offer. The small spaces they offer are ideal for local businesses and start-ups. They offer a place for businesses that can't afford the rents in newer retail developments, or can't fill the large spaces in auto -oriented strip areas. Stores and restaurants can be social places where customers interact with others. People want to go out to businesses where they see people enjoying themselves, and where they can run into friends and neighbors, while drinking, dining, working out, or purchasing daily items close to home. The opportunity for downtown Monticello is to provide people with an experience. A future downtown Monticello may provide a place where many more people are shopping, eating, sitting by the Mississippi River, walking, biking and socializing. In the context of this new national retail reality, downtown Monticello has the bones to be a destination retail area. Retail Vitality Assessment and Strategies An assessment of Broadway Street retail conditions was conducted as part of this plan. Selected findings and strategies from that assessment are presented here. Much more detail can be found in the Retail Vitality Background Report, found in the appendix of this plan. Storefront Density. Storefront density is a key metric, because streets that are walkable have numerous shopping and dining choices within a small area. Monticello is fortunate to have a high density of storefronts, compared with retail districts in peer cities. Strategy recommendation. • Establish development guidelines that ensure small store density is built into any new development in the storefront district. Store mix An assessment of store types shows that too many storefronts are rented by businesses that don't contribute to the vibrancy of the area because they don't have much walk-up traffic. There is also a real lack of food and beverage businesses, which serve as important anchors in many comparison areas. Strategy recommendation. • Initiate a retail recruitment program for the district, which would identify and attract key retail stores and food beverage businesses, that will be complementary to the existing stores. Walkability Broadway Street is highly walkable. The buildings extend to the sidewalk and have few gaps between them. The streetscaping is a bit dated, but it offers pedestrian scale lighting and pedestrian refuges. Many of the buildings have large windows that front the street, which draw one's eyes into the store and enhance the ease of walking by. The greatest challenge to Broadway Street's walkability is the automobile traffic which serves as a barrier to circulating comfortably through the district. Strategy recommendations. • work with MNDOT and the County to add stop signs and crosswalks at Broadway and Walnut. Evaluate and improve the Pine Street crossing from a pedestrian perspective. Building Conditions Building conditions in downtown Monticello vary greatly. Deferred maintenance is evident. Building renovation is expensive, even if it will usually be more cost effective than wholesale redevelopment. In buildings that are occupied and cash -flowing, it can be difficult to justify tackling these improvements on a strictly market basis. Some outside financial incentives will probably also be needed to advance this goal. In the short run, some public support for improving facades may offer the most bang for the buck. Strategy recommendation. • Establish a fafade improvement program that offers financial support for investments that improve the visual appearance of buildings and district identity. Visual Identity Many successful retail streets have recognizable visual themes that make them memorable and vivid. The buildings in downtown Monticello vary greatly in style, size and condition. Treatments of windows, signage and displays varies greatly as well. Patterns that establish a sense of identity are lacking. Strategy recommendation • Businesses on Broadway Street could agree to use signage improvements as an initial vehicle for improving the perceived condition of the district, and presenting some common visual elements (color, pattern, shape, creativity, etc) that build a sense of identity. Marketing and Activation Business Mix in Storefront District 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% - The Broadway Street district can be animated via marketing, events, and the activation of public spaces. Promotion programs are most successful when there is committed ownership by the business community. They can have endless forms and variations, limited only by the creativity of those involved. The physical environment can also be animated by sidewalk merchandise displays, sidewalk seating, and the creation of public space and outdoor seating between buildings Strategy recommendations Organize building and business owner interest, within an existing organization or a new one, to pursue a coordinated and creative retail vibrancy program on Broadway Street. Activate sidewalks and new plaza areas as much as possible—so that the vibrancy of the area is visible to passersby. Businesses per 500 lineal feet iz 10 general merchandise, apparel and accessories Business Density Business density is the concentration of businesses in an area. When businesses are concentrated it is easier to walk among them and to visit several during one trip. Higher density of businesses also creates a vibrant environment that can feel busy and active with signs, storefront displays and outdoor seating. City of Monticello Small Area Plan I Character Areas Non-contributing ' Non - retail destination food and beverage ' neighborhood goods and services -p oc v o c v o a v N v N V D C V C 1 6 C O V t - O O W O C O W O o o o m o general merchandise, apparel and accessories Business Density Business density is the concentration of businesses in an area. When businesses are concentrated it is easier to walk among them and to visit several during one trip. Higher density of businesses also creates a vibrant environment that can feel busy and active with signs, storefront displays and outdoor seating. City of Monticello Small Area Plan I Character Areas Non-contributing ' Non - retail destination food and beverage ' neighborhood goods and services general merchandise, apparel and accessories Business Density Business density is the concentration of businesses in an area. When businesses are concentrated it is easier to walk among them and to visit several during one trip. Higher density of businesses also creates a vibrant environment that can feel busy and active with signs, storefront displays and outdoor seating. City of Monticello Small Area Plan I Character Areas Physical Analysis Monticello in the Region Monticello ("little hill") sits on the Mississippi River between Saint Cloud and Minneapolis. It was settled at this location because the river is relatively shallow and calm and it made for an easy river crossing. Its connection to the region changed dramatically when I-94 was completed in With two exits and an improved bridge across the Mississippi River, Monticello has become a crossroads community. Original Plat of Monticello The original plat of Monticello consisted of a square (330'x 330') aligned to the river. Generally the 66' lots faced north and south. Broadway was distinguished from other streets with a narrower lot dimension - accommodating mercantile and main street buildings. Existing Conditions (publicly owned properties in blue) Existing Conditions: Buildings by use Community and Public Employment Commercial Housing Local Roads The local road network resembles the original plan of the City - with square blocks and a dense network of streets. Over time, the integrity of the grid has been slightly eroded with superblocks and street closings that respond to high volume arterials. Regional Roads Over time, Pine Street and Broadway have become regional roads. The growth of these roads have connected the City to the Region, but they have also had major impacts on local connectivity and land use. Pedestrian Environment The pedestrian experience at street level is a key determinant to creating a successful Downtown. The diagram above indicates the quality of the environment along each block face from poor to excellent. There are many factors that make up the overall experience including the condition of the sidewalk, traffic alongside the sidewalk, and the level of activity or comfort the adjacent property provides for the pedestrian. Comfortable OK Poor City of Monticello Small Area Plan I Character Areas Public Process The Planning process included a focused public engagement process consisting of a Steering committee, open meetings, and specific engagement activities. The Steering Committee was formed to review content of the Plan and to provide feedback. The Team met with Steering Committee 4 times between February and May; with the general public 3 times, with EDA 2 times and with the Parks Commission and planning Commission once. In addition the Team conducted focused public outreach activities at the Community Center and Library. A table was set up with do-it-yourself activities and surveys that residents could quickly partake in. The team also conducted a series of stakholder meetings with property owners, business owners, and county/ state staff. During these meetings, the team discussed general direction of the Plan and stakholder interest in participating in the Plan. Dear Mom, I visited Monticello this weekend and... �er�la�3�uw� wa�c► �'c�4t~lil 1, pad %} W- pow -N-4 -)A-4p, r Ve.Ir. , . , Sirrterely, Dear mom, I visited Monticello this weekend and... jg_ �*7*''� .� cam -141 ju mage 4�jyrrJ 5�►'SJ «j6 will fLr- rw r-� se.. 44 bt et; 4jrjI as AU, L„S-Ao 6 Sincerely, A' Dear Mom, I visited Monticello this weekend and... /had Lro Ir.ad &n eav, Il 41 Gf lee CreGC#17 a n eW o� phi — `wed fr6 on Yh-e Int I rf ss? Sincerely, r Dear Mom, i visited Monticello this weekend and_. } y ,t C) fYtG{ {ci.�arr{� f�cc�x-1L�G�� shprl Icapd- � U e_t 4D r O Iv +u c--- fG�Sl y, VLS6 4-U4-- Wilnk LY)%-, arol�lf5�{y -fo IOCA V -u f( &rhSts 0� _Lt.c C� fraS urar��5. nQra'.5 d as '7A 4t,,,L vir,ty wig otw I YEn GAI Saa ryaTT+t}wrac1 jak-rpMkAk^(ye<lubafsa 4t��c1 C�nv�c�5 Sincerely, Strengths During the public process participants were asked to place green dots on the areas of Downtown that they deemed were the "strongest" or the most beloved. This included: » The Community Center and Library Broadway The Riverfront Parks Weaknesses During the public process participants were asked to place red dots on the areas of Downtown that they deemed were the "weakest." This included: The Pine Street Broadway intersection The appearance of Downtown upon arriving from the north. Vacant lots and large parking areas. Appearance of blighted buildings and disinvestment on Broadway east of Pine Street. City of Monticello Small Area Plan I Character Areas M J I A ICC�IIT+/td! Goals and Objectives Project Goals I Shift the Center and Double Down on Broadway. Over time the travel and use patterns of Downtown have changed - altering the overall experience of downtown. Up until 1960, despite Broadway's designation as a State highay (152) most travel was local. However, as the region grew, Monticello became a crossroads - thereby burdening Broadway and Pine Street with high volumes of through traffic and widened streets. Today, the Broadway / Pine Street intersection is one of the most traveled intersections in the region. Whereas that quality makes for great visibility, it also makes for a poor pedestrian experience and poor access to adjacent properties. Broadway, west of Pine Street, is relatively lightly traveled and unlike Broadwway east of Pine Street, it has retained its pedestrian scale. Furthermore, the City has developed successful parks at the end of Cedar Street and Walnut Street. Therefore, an opportunity exists to fully extend Walnut and Cedar Street down to the park and grow the downtown mercantile district towards the riverfront along Broadway. Improve the Pine Street Experience for Everyone. Whether passing through Monticello along Pine Street (TH 25), trying to cross Pine Street by foot, or going to a business along Pine Street, the experience of using Pine Street is generally a negative one for all users. The environment of Pine Street projects a negative image and it is a divider between the east and west side of the town. Whereas Pine Street will always be a heavily traveled street, it does not need to be a negative experience. The community can take it back, claiming it for more appropriate development types, making it safer, more pleasant, and attractive for all users. noo 000 noo nnn nnn°nnn nnn nn nn nn nn inn Lots of Small Investments, a few medium ones and just one or two big ones. Monticello, despite it's growth, is proud to be a small town. Small towns develop charm and character through a series of small incremental investments that together add up to help a place become memorable and beloved. Simple investments such as new awnings, improved lighting and well maintained landscaping can make a big impression. Small buildings that fit on vacant parcels or otherwise underutilized land can happen quickly - adding vitality to a community. By promoting a high quantity of smaller investments (1/4 block and smaller) and medium scaled redevelopment projects (up to 1/2 block in scale), the Downtown will become more diverse, more lively, more responsive and adaptable to changes in the market place. A few medium scaled investments, warranted by a strong market or a strategic need, are important and valuable. But they should be carefully scaled and implemented so as to not disrupt the fragile fabric of the small town. Engage and love the riverfront. Go beyond the Swan. Great places have unique assets that differentiate them from others. Monticello has the Mississippi River. This defining feature can be further utilized to the benefit of Monticello residents and businesses. A riverfront that is well connected with blue and green trails, is publicly accessible and is activated throughout the day and the year can become a defining feature for the City and an important driver of economic activity. City of Monticello Small Area Plan I Goals and Objectives Character Areas Character Areas: Purpose The Plan divides the study area into four different Character Areas. The purpose of this is to create sub- areas in downtown, each with its own identity and purpose and direction. The character areas are developed based on their context and their future role in the downtown. Typically each character area is a mix of uses, but also has a dominant use. eWalnut Street How does the Plan Balance Flexibility with Predictability The Plan describes a Vision for Downtown as a lively place with pedestrian scaled spaces and building. The Plan favors human scaled spaces over vehicular scaled spaces; multiple small investments over single large investments and coordinated actions over individual directions. The Plan is based on time -tested approaches to town building and urban design as well as the strong sentiments received in the public process. This vision is described in words and illustrations throughout the document. Generally, the Character Area Section uses illustrative drawings to describe the feel and image of a place while the Frameworks section generally uses conceptual diagrams that convey broad ideas and concepts. Together, the Plan gives directions for how to arrange buildings, infrastructure and open space so the resulting ensemble is consistent with the Vision. The use of both illustrative, precise, and diagrammatic illustrations is intentional in an effort to create predictability and offer flexibility. This is a long range plan that relies on a multitude of investors working in a coordinated manner. Therefore the correct balance of predictability and flexibility is important because a balance of predictability and flexibility attracts investment while the lack of predictability and flexibility repels investment. Adoption of this Plan by City Council is intended to be a strong statement of predictability because it sets in motion several public actions designed to implement the Vision of the Plan. So, while the Plan (in locations) is exact and precise, it recognizes that the end result may or may not look exactly like the illustrations because individual investors and developers will interpret the Plan slightly different, each adding their own expertise and nuance to the Plan. This is encouraged because it will add richness and nuance to the end result. City of Monticello Downtown Small Area Plan I Character Areas M Riverfront Riverfront Character Area: The and recomendations guidelines on this page pertain to the area colored on this diagram Perspective from Walnut street, looking across a redesigned West Bridge Park Despite being a town born on the River, the Downtown does not take great advantage of its unique location. Broadway is a block removed from the Riverfront and the main connection to the River, Walnut Street, ends in a staircase. The entry experience to Monticello from the north is mundane with vacant properties and a thick wall of trees that obscures potential views to public spaces and Downtown The Riverfront Character Area will become a proud new public gathering space for Downtown Monticello that compliments Broadway and the full Monticello Park System. The Plan recommends redesigning the riverfront parks so they are more visible, accessible, active and flexible and promoting development that takes advantage of access to the river. A new park will be capable of handling larger crowds for events, and will be more accessible and usable on a daily basis with additional amenities and features designed for everyday use. The Plan promotes access to the riverfront by extending Walnut Street to connect to River Street. It will be designed as a multi- use street that can be closed for farmers markets, gatherings, and other events. The Plan recommends and leveraging public property of Block 52 to create a new signature development with market rate housing and a destination restaurant or entertainment use overlooking the park and the river. Public parking is maintained on Block 52 and added to River Street. existin Bridge Park River St Block 52 It It I � x •s■ x �„r„ Site Sections Through Block 52 and West Bridge Park Broadway )( 1 0 Redesign Riverfront parks to ©Encourage new housing include more active events and surrounding the riverfront programming in West Bridge Park parks on vacant and (amphitheater, water feature, underutilized parcels concessions) and passive uses in Maintain and improve the east bridge park. 0 intersection at River Street 0 Add parking and sidewalks to and Pine Street. River Street 0 Improve the underpass of OStreet Reconnect Walnut Street to River design Pine Street at the River. with a that allows Walnut Street be for © Consider a seasonal bridge to used to the island to provide events and park expansion. additional recreational OWork with the private sector to activity to east and west create a signature development Bridge park on Block 52, with market rate housing and a restaurant that overlooks the Park Precedent Images City of Monticello Downtown Small Area Plan I Character Areas Broadway Broadway Character Area: The and recomendations guidelines on this page pertain to the area colored on this diagram Perspective on Broadway, looking west with a pocket park across the street Broadway - west of Pine Street - has remained physically intact as Downtown's primary storefront district. Broadway is relatively well-maintained and home to several services and community anchors such as the Cornerstone Cafe. However, with growth of retail along the highway and elsewhere in town, Broadway is no longer a competitive location for general retail. The Plan recommends re -positioning the center of Downtown from the Pine/Broadway intersection to the Broadway/Walnut intersection. This will be partially accomplished with intersection improvements that make it easier to cross Broadway at Walnut Street. This should include curb extensions, fewer through lanes, clearer crosswalks, blinkers and eventually as warranted, a four-way stop sign. These improvements will increase the flow of pedestrian and bike traffic to the river and in between stores on both sides of Broadway. Small pocket parks can be developed on vacant lots mid -block on Broadway. These spaces can serve as convenient pedestrian connections between parking areas mid bloc and the sidewalks on Broadway. In addition, they can be small plazas with seating for resting, gathering, and even restaurants if the buildings next to them can be opened up to the pocket parks. Existing Proposed Pedestrian 75 Feet 63 Feet Crossing width Across Broadway East -bound Left Turn Lane Stacking Capacity 8 Cars 21 Cars L Modify striping and median on Broadway 0 create a safer pedestrian environment. Small pocket parks on vacant properties that 0 offer respite from Broadway and pedestrian connections to parking in the middle of the block Curb extensions at Walnut and Broadway to 0 provide space for landscaping, seating, and gathering ONew development that replicates the storefront scale currently present on Broadway. New buildings should have flexible interiors so a main street scale can be accomplished in larger buildings. © Facade improvement programs that improve signage, awnings, and general appearance of existing storefronts Existing Conditions �"�"�"� on Broadway ------- ------------------------� _. _. _. _. _. _. w 4-- _. --- r --- Ir In — — -- - - - - - -----------— II -------------- ~------- u ac New development along Broadway is encouraged if it replicates the scale of existing Proposed Lane _ buildings and shopfronts. Buildings up to four stories, with storefronts located on the Configurations on sidewalk and doors every 45' feet will fit in comfortably with existing buildings. Allowances Broadway w for 10 foot setbacks from the sidewalk to create additional pedestrian amenities (such as seating) are appropriate. The Plan does not recommend additional widening of Broadway. Instead, the Plan recommends working with partners to find other measures to mitigate congestion. —------------- ,� .. -------------- ------------------------- v f --�— _ _ ----oo oo�o 000�o y a _ 0000000H c y y __u a City of Monticello Downtown Small Area Plan I Character Areas Broadway Design Guidelines Precedent Images Suggested Redevelopment Guidelines Facade and Frontage • All buildings should have a storefront or arcaded frontage along Broadway • Minimum 50% (windows/doors) transparency on ground floor • Signage integrated with building • Varied cornice lines that resemble the scale of traditional main street buildings. • Traditional commercial materials such as brick, stone, or split face rock are encouraged. Public Realm • 10-15' sidewalks with street trees and curb extensions that reduce the crossing distance along Broadway. • On -street parking for convenience and to buffer sidewalk from traffic • Encroachments for seating, signage and display allowed • Mid -block pocket parks that provide a respite from Broadway and a connection to parking areas located mid block. • Parking located on -street and in shared lots mid -block • Attached corner plazas on Pine Street to create enhanced entrances and a gateway to the Broadway District �ass��9 Massing and Orientation • Buildings should generally be between two and four stories with varied rooflines. • All buildings should face onto Broadway. Corner buildings (on Pine Street, Walnut or Locust) may have two entrances, one on Broadway and one on the side street. • Buildings along pocket parks or corners may have a second entrance / orientation to side street or pocket park • Buildings should have varied widths with a maximum storefront of 60'. • Longer buildings should be articulated in approximately 30'-60' increments with setbacks, material change or fenestration Patterning. Building Use and Location • Small scale retail, dining, and entertainment uses are permitted on the ground floor. • Office, commercial, and housing are permitted on upper floors. • Buildings are located towards the front of the lot, directly on the back of the sidewalk with maximum 10' setbacks to create an enhanced entry or wider sidewalk. City of Monticello Downtown Small Area Plan I Character Areas M Walnut Street and Cedar Street Walnut and Cedar Streets Character Area: The and recommendations guidelines on this page pertain to the area colored on this diagram Walnut Street and Cedar Street are important corridors to the River as well as transitions between the commercial areas of downtown and the in -town neighborhoods. In order to perform in this capacity, the Plan encourages new housing to infill vacant lots and eventually for single family housing to transition to medium density housing. Live/work units or small service/production (such as insurance agent or jewelry maker) are permitted. In addition, the Plan recommends improvements to the street that will accommodate pedestrian and bike access to the River. This includes parallel parking, aligned sidewalks and crosswalks, and curb extensions at Broadway. 1 I \_X 0 Create a pedestrian promenade to the Riverfront with wide continuous sidewalks and well marked crosswalks Infill vacant lots and redevelop underutilized 0 parcels with housing in small apartments or townhouses. Small service or production uses are permitted within these and existing buildings. 69.1 a OEncourage new housing to face Walnut and Cedar Street, with multiple doors facing the street. OLocate all parking towards the middle of the block, accessed via a rear lane shared with other properties on the block. Encourage small and medium scaled residential buildings © (3-5 stories,1/4 to 1/2 block) that prioritize pedestrian scale and walkability. Perspective along Walnut Street, looking north towards the River. L i P m P X X4 8' 12' 8' 24' 8' 12' 8' �Q 80' ROW River Street rn � Y n aBroadway L c . U v .. 3rd Street Y v 0� 0,� g 4th Street s� o� v� a 5th Street c .—. tracks a � C 7th Street v Walnut Street Promenade to the River Proposed Paralell Parking Section of Walnut and Cedar Street On -street parking is important throughout Downtown. Paralell parking will not require an easement and is desireable in front of residential buildings. Diagonal parking requires an easement and yields 50% more parking spaces. City of Monticello Downtown Small Area Plan I Character Areas M Walnut Street and Cedar Street Guidelines Precedent Images Facade and Frontage • Porches and/ or dooryards are encouraged for all ground floor residential units. • Dormers and bay windows are encouraged to create a pedestrian scaled facade • Upper story balconies are encouraged. • Courtyards are permitted along 1/2 of a front property line. Public Realm • 6'-10' sidewalk, aligned across intersections and along the front of blocks. • On street parking for visitors to Downtown • Clearly marked crosswalks to accommodate pedestrian and bike access between the Community Center and the Riverfront a Massing and Orientation • Buildings should be between 2 and 4 stories. • Buildings should be primarilly oriented to Walnut and Cedar Street to create a comfortable pedestrian environment. • Dormers and roof articulations should be used to reduce the scale of buildings if buildings are longer than 100' in length. Building Use and Location • Primarily residential uses between the Civic Center and Walnut Street. Small scale service and commercial businesses permitted on corner of 4th and Cedar and 4th and Walnut. • Buildings oriented toward front (street) and front corners City of Monticello Downtown Small Area Plan I Character Areas M Pine Street Pine Street Character Area: The and recomendations guidelines on this page pertain to the area colored on this diagram Pine Street (Minnesota State Hwy 25) is an important and heavily traveled roadway in Monticello and Sherburne County. It is one of only two river crossings between Minneapolis and Saint Cloud and it connects to I-94 in Monticello. It also has an important local role because it is Downtown's connection to the rest of Monticello that lies south of I-94. The original plat of Monticello did not foresee the growth of Pine Street and as a result, the steady growth of traffic along it has had a strong impact on the community. While it connects Monticello to the region, it also divides the community between east and west. This Plan recognizes Pine Street as a regional roadway, but seeks to manage its impacts as it crosses through Downtown. The Plan does not recommend any additional widening and supports additional river crossings that would better serve both Downtown and the region. New development along Pine Street should be regional serving, but locally scaled. Buildings should be located on the corners with pedestrian refuges along Pine Street that improve the appearance and the experience of all along Pine Street. The Plan discourages additional property access to Pine Street and encourages side street access with through block (north/south) easements. i " Its-, 11 Perspective along Pine Street, looking north towards the River. QWork with MnDOT to maintain a 5 lane section(2 through lanes both directions with a center turning lane), do not increase speeds QWork with MNDot to improve pedestrian crossings wherever possible, preferably with traffic signals at 4th Street. OEncourage redevelopment on the corners of blocks, with entrances facing the street, and shared parking in the middle of the block. 0 Reduce the impact of parking to pedestrians by minimizing the width to 180'and buffering parking from the sidewalk with a low fence and streetscaping. Reduce direct property access to Pine Street © and encourage property access from side streets with through block easements. 11 1 lY a •+ a r� 1 11 11 a� � ■r ■ar <( 15, ) ( 70' ) <15, > I 100, ROW Proposed Section of Pine Street City of Monticello Downtown Small Area Plan I Character Areas 9 Pine Street Guidelines Precedent Images Facade and Frontage • Primary entrance to building should be clearly visible from Pine Street accomplished with careful design. • One story base level articulation is encouraged to create a pedestrian scale frontage. • Storefronts on the ground floor are encouraged to face Pine Street. If storefronts face mid block parking, there must be pedestrian access to the storefronts. • Corner treatments such as entrances, cornice feature, or towers are encouraged at the corners of the bocks. Public Realm • 10'-15' sidewalk; trees clustered in planters with ground cover or low shrubs. • Sidewalks buffered from parking lots with low wall or hedge. • Gateway treatments at River Street and 7th Street. - 1iofj tib/`tel Massing and Orientation • Buildings should be between 2 and 5 stories. • Buildings should be oriented to Pine Street. Secondary entrances can be located on side streets or facing parking lots. If located on the Broadway/Pine Street corner, buildings should have dual orientations - one towards Pine Street and one towards Broadway. Building Use and Location Larger retail/ commercial, office or hospitality uses that desire visibility, parking and regional access are encouraged. This does not apply to Block 52 which is located in the Riverfront character Area. • Buildings located towards front corners of Pine Street blocks. • Parking lots in mid block should not be wider than 180', but should be clearly visible from Pine Street and easilly accessible from side streets. City of Monticello Downtown Small Area Plan I Character Areas Blocks 52 and 34 Block 34 Block 34 (public ownership in blue) Br6o- Frontage And Ground Floor Uses Active (retail) uses are encouraged at Pine Street and Broadway. Residential frontages are encouraged on Cedar Street. The remainder of the block is flexible. Active Frontage Flexible Frontage (either Active or Residential) Most of the properties on Block 34 are - t i publicly owned. In addition, there are two I I I wells on the block that impact development. Redevelopment is further challenged by limitations by T on property access created medians on Broadway and Pine Street. The site is attractive for "outbound" retail and the plan recommends such a use to be located in the base of a multi use building on the corner Residential Frontage Active Frontage of Pine and Broadway. BroQa�QyStrPe F "er 4¢ 4p B ak.ISF % `y �r 4th ...� StrPe % Setbacks, Pocket Parks & Open Space Buildings should define the perimeter of the block with a front facade zone between 5' and 15' of the front property line. The two wells on site have 5o' setbacks and shou Id be incorporated into courtyards or parking areas. Building Setback Well Setback 19-0-- Parking ro Parking & Servicing 1 Primary access to mid block parking should occur from Cedar Street and 4th Street. Surface Parking Access Way Options The two illustrations above show potential options for development on Block 34 - both adhering to the guidelines. The top illustration shows a development pattern that assumes the property on Cedar Street remains. City of Monticello Downtown Small Area Plan I Blocks 52 and 34 Block 52 Block 52 (Public ownership in blue) Block 52 is a key block in the Downtown. It is highly visible and it sits on the West Bridge Park. The site slopes approximately 15' from Broadway to River Street. Broadway and Walnut contain mercantile buildings of varying quality. River Street has vacant parcels and underutilized buildings. lllll� Active Frontage lllll� Flexible Frontage (either Active or Residential) Frontage And Ground Floor Uses Active frontages (high transparency) and uses (retail and restaurants) should be located on Broadway, Walnut, and the west half of River Street. The remainder of the block is flexible - it can have either residential or active frontages. llllll� Building Setback l� Pocket Park & Open Space Setbacks, Pocket Parks & Open Space Buildings should define the perimeter of the Block. Minor setbacks (5'-10') for overhangs, seating, and display of goods is permitted on Broadway and Walnut. A more generous setback is permitted on Pine due to traffic volumes and access. Attached corner plazas are encouraged on the northwest corner of the block and permitted on the northeast and southeast corners. A� 'T rTri, IltltlF:.. r~ lllll� Surface Parking Access Way Parking & Servicing Access to mid block parking is encouraged on Pine Street and Walnut St. Parking should have minimal exposure to Broadway, River or Walnut St but should be large enough to replace the existing public parking lot on the block and should be expandable if the south side of the block redevelops. Careful consideration should be given to visibility and access to parking from Pine St since that will be the primary access as the site will be approached from the Bridge. Extra signage or a turning lane may be required. 1 A .� u�Fig Al 00A Ole f ay OIL - go go d� dy ■ Options The two illustrations above show potential options for development on Block 52 - both adhering to the guidelines. The top illustration shows new development on Broadway, articulated at a Main Street scale, with a corner plaza and a covered pass through as a form of pocket park. The bottom illustration shows a single corner development on Broadway, with a pocket park. f Approaching Downtown from the Bridge - ' Block 52 is the Gateway Block to Downtown from the 'r" ! Bridge. It is important to create an easy way for visitors ° to access mid -block parking as they approach downtown. The image to the left shows the approach - with enhanced landscaping, a turn lane, and clear signage to direct drivers to parking mid -block. %C\ City of Monticello Downtown Small Area Plan I Blocks 52 and 34 N Frameworks Frameworks: Purpose Land Use, Open Space and Transportation are the three frameworks that organize and define the physical environment. As with systems in the human body, each must function independently - and together with - the others. If one fails, others are impacted. This is why it is important to understand frameworks as individual systems that must function as part of a single Downtown. The Plan is also divided into frameworks in order to allow different agencies, departments, and investors to act in concert with each other. This will help ensure public and private investments are coordinated, less risky, and more publicly acceptable. O — Required Retail Frontage — Small Retail Opportunities Commercial Mixed -Use Multi -Family Housing Public Employment Pa rk/Open S pace/Cemetery Core Study Area sh- - •. 4*♦ 1 .♦ ♦• 1 Frameworks: Land Use and Development Development patterns that support social interaction, local character, and a compact connected and walkable environment. General Approach The Land Use Plan promotes a development pattern that recognizes the essential role that Downtowns plays in the communities they serve. Successful Downtowns tend to be places that serve many functions for the full cross section of the community throughout the year and across generations. They are places to gather, eat, live, shop, celebrate, protest, recreate, meet, be entertained, and to visit. They are places that promote social interactions and the unique creative expression of the community. At their best, Downtowns are places that exude pride because they represent the best the community has to offer. In order to promote these ideals, this Plan favors policies and development patterns that improve downtown for those who currently use it and patterns that support the places that people value. Therefore, development patterns and land uses in this Plan seek to support the Main Street character of Broadway, the importance of Walnut Street as a promenade to the River, regional and local needs of Pine Street, and the riverfront as the birthplace of the City. This Plan also recognizes the traditional (and still relevant) role of Downtown Monticello as well as the changing nature of small Downtowns throughout the country. In doing so, the Plan is committed to retaining the small scale shopfront District on Broadway by encouraging uses that value "experience" over "convenience". At the same time, the Plan encourages Pine Street (the regional face of downtown) to develop as a corridor that emphasizes convenience and accessibility. Together, both Broadway and Pine Street can complement each other to create a downtown that attracts a wide range of investments. Physically, the Plan favors compact walkable small town design with a fine grained mix of uses. The Plan arranges development types and land uses so valued places are supported, and new investments can add to the overall vitality of downtown. Recommendations • Create a Center to Downtown that is active throughout the day and into the evening - year round. The Walnut / Broadway Intersection should become the heart of this area. • Improve connections to the River by locating uses that benefit from open spaces and activities associated with the River. • Improve the entry experience from the north. • Maintain a shopfront District along Broadway, west of Pine Street comprised of traditional main street (mercantile) buildings that have retail/restaurant space on the ground floor and wither housing or offices above. • Create a development pattern on Pine Street that benefits from high visibility and regional access. • Infill Walnut Street and Cedar Street with mid scale housing (2-4 stories) that creates an effective transition between the in -town neighborhoods and the Downtown. City of Monticello Downtown Small Area Plan I Frameworks N Frameworks: Parks and Open Spaces Parks, Plazas, and Sidewalks that are lively, safe and pleasant to be in. �t @, ®� West Bridgell o49 ,��Park ` I, 00'sc� O/ w h h� Q �w a dd metery�� L� Improved Pedestrian 0 and Bicycle Crossing ■ Community Parks Neighborhood Parks E� Pocket Parks Seasonal Bridge Convertible Streets Pedestrian Promenade to River Proposed Bituminous Trail Connections '1111 Existing Bituminous Trial ® ® ® ® MRTTrail East Bridge -Poll \ / "O's, rePr Ri�P�Sr�Per °er 4th Street Park Picnic Area Park Facilities Playground Water Feature Amphitheater Seasonal Bridge Park Overlook Public Gardens Sledding Hill General Approach Parks and Open Space play an important role in distinguishing the Downtown from other areas of Monticello. Unlike much of Monticello where parks are generally programmed for recreational / sports and defined by trees and greenery, the parks downtown should focus on gathering and general social interaction as well as planned events. Therefore, in order to support and enhance the environment for downtown residents and businesses, this Plan expands the definition of parks beyond the valued park spaces that are already in use - namely Front Street Park, East and West Bridge Park. The Downtown Parks should also take in consideration the needs of new downtown residents and visitors. Upon implementation of this plan, several hundred new residents will be living in the downtown. It is likely that new downtown housing will be more compact and with less outdoor space than typical single family homes. Inevitably this will result in park demands that don't currently exist. Meeting these needs is a great opportunity to further develop a well designed and well connected park and open space system. Ila Illustrative Master Plan: East and West Bridge Park Recommendations • Redesign East and West Bridge park to include an amphitheater, water feature, riverfront access, picnicking, and additional space for passive park use. • Improve Front Street Park to include improved boat landing and space for nature oriented programming. • Connect the two Bridge Parks with Front Street Park with improved pathways and trails. Design all three parks as a single park with multiple uses. • Provide access to the islands with a seasonal bridge • Create small pocket parks mid block on Broadway to offer plazas that connect to parking lots in the middle of the block. • Redesign Walnut Street between River Street and Broadway as a special street that can be closed and used for festivals and events throughout the year. • Consider all sidewalks for opportunities to enhance greenery and public art. Emphasize Walnut Street, River Street and Broadway as the main pedestrian corridors in Downtown. • Use public art throughout the parks and corridors to distinguish Downtown as a place of cultural expression and celebration. • Work closely with local businesses, residents (new and existing) to ensure local parks and open spaces are appropriately designed and programmed for their varied needs. • Modify the Embracing Downtown Plan that recommends off street bike paths on Pine Street. In lieu of this off-street path, create north / south bike access to the river along Walnut and Cedar through a complete streets policy. Encourage bicycle crossing of Pine Street at 4th, River and 7th Street. • Maintain sidewalks and paths along TH25 City of Monticello Downtown Small Area Plan I Frameworks Frameworks: Circulation and Access A complete network of flexible streets that favors the needs of residents, businesses, and visitors. 01, / 7- 7 7z �7 0 Traffic Calming IM11 Improved Pedestrian Crossing AW (J4 Signalized Intersection F� Access Way © Surface Parking - - - Interstate 94 mmm= Pine Street (MN 25) ', mmm= Broadway Street (CSAH 75) Pedestrian Promenade to River Add Sidewalks to Complete Grid General Approach The design of the streets (and the full right of ways) in downtown have a significant bearing on how downtown functions and feels. The rights-of-way in the Downtown should be designed to create a comfortable and safe physical environment that encourages a range of activities and development types. The Plan recommendations, therefore, favor a high quality, well-connected, and flexible street system that facilitates all users of downtown - especially those who are using and not passing through Downtown. With two main roads bisecting downtown, traffic volumes are relatively high. This provides an opportunity to capture additional business downtown, but it also can have a deleterious impact on the pedestrian and business environment in some locations. Recognizing this situation, previous Plans have emphasized Walnut Street as a main pedestrian connection to the River (not Pine Street). This Plan supports that idea and offers several ways in which that can be further achieved. This Plan departs from previous Plans in that it also encourages pedestrian activity on streets other than Walnut - this includes, Broadway, Pine Street and Cedar. While the Plan recognizes the regional function of Broadway and Pine, the Plan strives to balance this function with the local needs of community connectivity, aesthetics, pedestrian safety, and multi -modal travel. Successful Downtowns are not just easy to get to, they are pleasant to be in and to stay for multiple reasons. Therefore, this Plan, discourages future road widenings that would have further negative impacts on pedestrians Downtown - especially along the primary pedestrian corridors and districts. In lieu of road widenings, the Plan champions an well connected and balanced urban street grid system that can be programmed to flex and contract as needed to meet all the needs of Downtown. Accomplishing this goal will require a series of smaller interventions (signal timing, street connections, traffic controls, traffic calming, time -of -day -parking restrictions, modified property access, etc.) in lieu of wholesale street widening that would likely have a negative physical impact on the built environment of Downtown. The Plan also supports a street network where the Level of Service for pedestrians, transit riders, and cyclists are considered on equal terms to those of motorists and delay measurements from modelling are considered as a portion of overall average trip, not in isolation. Recommendations • Connect Walnut Street to River Street • Maintain the River Street / Pine Street signal as the formal entrance to Downtown and an important pedestrian connection across Pine Street. • Add a traffic signal at 4th and Pine to help balance the grid and turning movements at the Pine / Broadway Intersection. • Modify Walnut / Broadway and Cedar / Walnut Broadway intersection to prioritize pedestrian crossings and access to the river. • Narrow the travel lanes on Walnut Street, add parallel parking, where possible and ensure continuous safe and pleasant sidewalks. • Add sidewalks at the perimeter of blocks where they are not currently present • Discourage direct property access to Pine Street; favoring the side streets wherever possible with through -block lanes or easements. • Allow direct property access to Block 52 from Pine Street in order to reduce volumes at the Pine / Broadway intersection. • Discourage deceleration lanes; encourage speeds that do not require them. • Consider traffic calming at River Street and Locust (or Linn) to prevent excessive speeds - similar to River Street and Cedar Street as an example City of Monticello Downtown Small Area Plan I Frameworks N Frameworks: Parking General Approach In order to accomplish the goals in the Plan related to the public realm and human scaled design, the Plan recommends a nuanced and flexible approach to parking. While the Plan recognizes many people, in the future, will still arrive to Downtown by car and it is important to make sure parking is plentiful and accessible; it is equally important to ensure parking does not dominate the Downtown area. Ultimately the goal is to ensure customers and visitors can comfortably and safely get to their destination, not just their parking space. Parking is just one part of a visitors experience. Supply of Parking was a much discussed topic throughout the development of the Plan. Some state there is not enough parking, while others state there is plenty. The real answer to this question depends on how it is measured. Ideally, the answer should be data driven combining inventory numbers, utilization rates and stakeholder or user group interviews. Often this analysis reveals answers such as "there is enough parking during hte day, but not int he evening" In 2010 the City conducted a parking study to determine, among other things, the utilization of existing parking. It concluded that at any given time 80% of the parking supply is unused and only 20% of the parking spaces are occupied. This suggests that there was ample supply at the time to absorb a considerable amount of new development and visitors. This study was conducted several years ago, and it should be updated so the city and stakeholders have an accurate picture of how the existing parking supply is used. Current Demand / Supply analysis (on following page) suggests that the supply of parking downtown exceeds the demand as measured by existing square footage a "stacked" or "nonshared" parking approach. Though it is important to note that the surplus/deficit is not balanced across the four blocks nor is it excessive. In otherwords, some blocks appear balanced, while others have a deficit or a surplus. Inorder to obtain a truly accurate picture of the parking, the inventory has to be combined with a utilization/ occupancy study as well as interviews with user groups. Regardless of whether there is enough parking or not, the Plan proposes a moving towards a "park once" District (Blocks 51,52,35,36,31,32) that allows visitors to the area to park once and use sidewalks and trails to go from one location to another in the Downtown. This is possible if the city carefully manages and maintains parking and offers a high quality public realm that makes the experience of moving from one location to another a pleasant one - throughout the day evening and year. The single most important improvement to be made is improvements to the Walnut / Broadway intersection. The lack of stop signs at this intersection makes it uncomfortable for pedestrians to cross, which in turn makes it unlikely for visitors to utilize parking on one side of Broadway when their destination is on the other side of Broadway. For this reason, this plan places the highest priority on improving this intersection. It is critical to creating a "park once" District. A successful "park once" District also relies on provisions for shared parking, payments in - lieu of parking, close monitoring of parking inventory, excellent wayfinding and signage, a compact walkable environments. Shared parking is crucial to creating a vibrant, multimodal downtown. Different land uses have different peak parking demands. Allowing a daytime office building, for example, to share its parking at night with the nearby restaurant allows less parking to be built than if the restaurant had to construct its own parking. The outcome is less land dedicated to parking. Shared parking benefits multiple user groups. First, allowing less parking to be built saves up to $20,000 per space in construction costs. Cheaper development costs then facilitate lower sale or lease costs for would- be homeowners or renters. Second, well -crafted shared parking agreements can allow property owners to recognize significantly more return per space on their investment. Third, shared parking is the only way to make most small downtown parcels viable for development. Monticello's true economic potential will only be unlocked when it can provide an easily accessible pool of shared, public parking. Finally, shared parking will better enable growth without exacerbating congestion problems. Building reserved parking for every use results in system inefficiencies and will ultimately induce more vehicle trips on Monticello's downtown streets. Shared Parking in a Downtown Shared Uses: Real Demand reduction in needed supply morning afternoon evening time of day v v a 0 U Unshared Supply / "Stacked Demand" Parking Expectations morning afternoon a fewdistance blocks between frustrated �ati\ors e� parking space and eaSp�a�P destination ounusually tio9Ne lucky a few feet time of day a few a few hours minutes length of visit dining and unique convenience shopping experiences on Broadway and on Pine Street the Riverfront s evening Shared Parking in a Downtown The traditional approach to parking is to provide designated supply for each use based on the highest parking demand for that use. This does not account for fluctuations in demand by time of say, resulting in parking being overbuilt. Actual parking demand changes by use by the time of day, resulting in a peak that is much lower than a traditional approached would predict. Parking Expectations Change as Broadway Changes As Broadway and the Riverfront transition from service and convenience retail to experience based retail (food) and events, customers expectations for the distance between their parking space (if arriving by car) and the final destination changes. We expect to park a block away from a place that we may spend a few hours at. City of Monticello Downtown Small Area Plan I Frameworks N Parking Recommendations Strategy Priority #1 Maximize use of existing parking supply Strategically invest in information and technology Improve mobility options to reduce parking demand Simplify and leverage the zoning code Recommendation Create a parking program that focuses on creating available spaces for different user groups. Pilot a shared parking program in which private parking is shared with the "public." Enhance pedestrian access to existing parking lots by developing small pocket parks on Broadway Expand and clarify on -street parking supply on all blocks in downtown. Invest in and implements a comprehensive parking signage and wayfinding system. Continually monitor occupancy, availability and utilization of parking throughout downtown Complete the sidewalk system in Downtown to make walking more comfortable. Encourage bicycle access to Downtown with bike racks and clearly designated bike routes. Revise zoning code to better support walkable development in the Downtown core. Revise the zoning code to incentivize sharing of parking and underground parking for residential buildings. Require Transportation Demand Management program for all development above a certain size. Adjust on street regulations and operations to maximize flexibility Enhance parking administration and at the curb operations Establish formal collaboration between the City, County, and other parking stakeholders. Provide Additional public parking as Strategically invest in public and shared parking supply in key needed locations. Key Principles for New Parking Supply • Ensure that parking is shared and open to the public to the greatest degree possible. • Manage new parking as part of the larger system so that prices and regulations primarily incentivize use by long-term parkers. If off street parking is more expensive than on street parking, people will continue to circle and create congestion. • Include technology and wayfinding that makes parking easy to locate and use. • Contribute to the downtown environment by supporting strong urban design, pedestrian access and safety, and promote street activity via ground floor uses. Specific Block By Block Recommendations Block 52: • provide 50 surface spaces for public use mid block when developing north half of block • locate residential parking underground • restripe Walnut Street with wider sidewalks for short term parking • provide short term on -street parking on River Street • expand public surface lot (50 spc) to south side of block when redeveloped. Block 51 • combine surface lots midblock • locate residential parking underground • provide short term on -street parking on River Street • provide short term on -street parking on Locust Street Block 35 • expand mid -block lot (15 spc)when redeveloping south west corner of block. • consider a midblock parking structure. This would require the re-routing of midblock utilities in order to preserve space for housing or other development to face the street. • locate residential parking underground Block 36 • maintain and expand mid block lot (15 spc) when redeveloping southwest corner of block • locate residential parking underground • provide short term on -street parking on 3rd Street Other • work with property owners on blocks 31, 32, 18,17 to create shared parking arrangements City of Monticello Downtown Small Area Plan I Frameworks N Supply and "Stacked" or "Unshared" Demand Analysis public private note: "stacked" parking demand assumes 4 spc / 1000 SF. This is greater than the current Monticello downtown standard of 2.8 spc / 1000 SF note: existing non residential SF and its associated demand includes approximately 15,000 SF of building that is currently vacant note: assumes all new residential parking is underground. This allows the middle of the block to be used for public parking. note: a complete parking analysis will incorporate utilization data as well as user group interviews to determine the most accurate possible analysis of parking. Existing: River 11,500 Non Residential SF 51 1 bck Non Residential SF lo ■ L52 23 spc 68 spc Parking Supply 51 �■ Parking Supply + L46 spc "Stacked" Demand "Stacked" Demand � w 2 Broadway a 39,200SF I 159 spc +3 spc 156spc 25,000 Non Residential SF 36 35 Non Residential SF 22,500 block _■ block +21 spc 121 spc Parking Supply 36 35 Parking Supply 184 spc +94 spc 100 spc "Stacked" Demand ' "Stacked" Demand 90spc 3rd Interim: After development on Block 52 and Walnut Street River � improvements 51 ' 52 11,500 Non Residential SF block +39 spc 85 spc Parking Supply 51 �■ 46 spc "Stacked" Demand v 2 Broadway 25,000 Non Residential SF 86 35 block +21 spc ,2, spc Parking Supply 36 100 spc "Stacked" Demand I 3rd Build Out: After development on south side of Block 52, and south east corners of blocks 36 and 35. 16,500 Non Residential SF block +19 spc 85 spc Parking Supply 51 66 spc "Stacked" Demand U River 51 52 J Broadwaya Non Residential SF 34,000 block 52 Parking Supply 112 Spc "Stacked" Demand 136 spc Non Residential SF 98,200 SF TOTAL Parking Supply 533 spc +140 spc "Stacked"Demand 3927pc -24 spc Non Residential SF 92,500 SF TOTAL Parking Supply 502 spc +130 Spc "Stacked"Demand 372 spc Non Residential SF 22,500 block Parking Supply 184 spc +94 spc 35 -Stacked" Demand 90spc Non Residential SF 28,500 SF block 52 Parking Supply 162 Spc +48 spc "Stacked" Demand 114 scp Non Residential SF 22,500 25,000 Non Residential SF I 36 c 35 block +36 spc 136 spc Parking Supply 35 block 36 6 Parking Supply 100 spc +10 spc � 100 spc "Stacked" Demand "Stacked" Deman, 90spc ' 3, Non Residential SF 92,500 SF I TOTAL ParkingSupply_ spc +113 spc "Stacked"Demand' 370spc City of Monticello Downtown Small Area Plan I Frameworks Buffalo, MN Hastings, MN Hutchinson, MN Main Streets In Minnesota The arrangement of buildings, open spaces, and parking impacts whether or not a Main Street maintains its human scale and pedestrian character. In the three cities illustrated above: parking is accommodated in a variety of configurations. All three examples offer on -street parking, parking behind buildings, and larger lots on the edge of the downtown. Some of the parking is dedicated to a single use, such as a grocery store, however most of it is shared between all users downtown. Main Street is reinforced with a building pattern that aligns with the back of the sidewalk. By enclosing the street with buildings, a public room is created and retailers benefit from pedestrian traffic on both sides f the street. F f5 Town centre Park Street Ob Harbourside Multi - storey Cosens quay 5 Melcom6e®� Regis Kalamazoo, MI IE Loveland, CO F ss,� a ©® �g acmrr� ®A® ®® ®® E1hjG Sr Shueure ®E 50'4 7 ' aim ME A a®�� 3n 7A! - 'ryas lo®® �ouh® Signage and Wayfinding Signage and wayfinding are a small but important apart of the parking process and overall downtown experience. Coordinated signage and wayfinding will make it easier for visitors to come to downtown and it presents a cohesive and coordinated image. City of Monticello Downtown Small Area Plan I Frameworks Implementation Introduction No one is served by a plan that sits on the shelf. Implementing this Downtown Monticello Small Area Plan means taking action on several fronts. • Adoption and Integration into City programs and Policies • Catalytic development projects • Retail vitality strategies • Public realm improvements Adoption and Integration into City Policies and Programs Relationship to Embracing Downtown Plan and the Comprehensive Plan In 2010, the City of Monticello completed the "Embracing Downtown Plan", a guide to redevelopment of downtown Monticello. The full area considered to be "Downtown Monticello", or the "Central Community District" extends from Interstate I-94 at its southern boundary to the Mississippi River in the north, and generally from Cedar Street on the east to Maple Street on the west. The Embracing Downtown Plan was adopted as an appendix to the Comprehensive Plan, and included three supporting documents, a Design Guideline, Transportation Analysis, and Market Analysis. The Downtown Small Area Study document serves as an update to the 2008 Monticello Comprehensive Plan and to the Embracing Downtown Plan for a specific portion of the downtown. Similar to the Embracing Downtown plan, it is proposed as an appendix to the Comprehensive Plan, although the primary goals will be recommended for insertion directly into the "Downtown" portion of the Land Use Chapter of the plan. For the geographic area encompassed by the Downtown Small Area Plan, the Downtown Small Area Plan supercedes the 2010 Embracing Downtown Plan. While the three supporting documents to the Embracing Downtown plan continue to inform the Comprehensive Plan and Small Area plan, where the Downtown Small Area plan provides specific guidance (such as within the Design Guidelines Section) , the standards therein prevail. Zoning Code and Development Regulations / Guidelines Implementation of this Plan will require adjustments to the existing zoning code. Certain uses, parking requirements, and building forms/types that the Plan promotes are not permitted in the current code. Adjusting a zoning code to be in compliance with Plan is commonplace and required since zoning is one of the implementation tools of the Comprehensive Plan. Refer to page 26 for details on boundaries of Small Area Plan and Embracing Downtown Plan. Complete Streets Policy The City should draft and adopt a Complete Streets Policy in order to wisely guide all public investments in streets and rights of ways. TODAY Implementation Strategy Public Realm Improvements Policies and Programs Physical Improvements Catalytic Projects Retail Vitality Adjustments and improvements to the physical environment are crucial to success of Downtown. Listed below are several important investments that will support implementation of the Plan. • Improve crossings of Broadway at Cedar and Walnut: Simple curb extensions will reduce the crossing distance and time for pedestrians. The city should work with the County to determine other strategies such as a four-way stop, widening the center median and / or creating a pedestrian refuge or maintaining only a single west bound lane on Broadway. • Fill the gaps in the sidewalk system. there are several blocks downtown with no sidewalks. They can be completed with redevelopment, but there is little risk in completing them in advance of redevelopment. • Connect Walnut to River Street: the City should work with the property owners to move forward this important initiative. ideally, this project would be completed in conjunction with redevelopment of Block 52 and the northwest corner of Block 51. • Benches, flowers, art and programming: Small investments such as these can make the downtown more hospitable for people to spend time in. • Redesign of West Bridge Park: The City (Parks Commission) should bein discussions with stakeholders regarding the redesign of the Park so it is better integrated with the River and the Downtown. This can begin with a resident / user survey or questionnaire and visits to nearby communities with successful riverfront parks. • Conversion of vacant lots to pop-up parks: Temporary or pop- up parks on vacant lots on Broadway can be spark innovative uses of underused land. Offering these spaces to local schools and artists and businesses can be an effective way to make good use of underused land. TOMORROW Catalytic Development Projects To change market perceptions of an area, it is advisable to concentrate public investments in development in an area where a new sense of place can emerge. That invites a private sector response. For that reason, Monticello is advised to foster a critical mass of catalytic development projects, and a new sense of place, along the Walnut Street corridor. At the north end of the corridor, new development projects would make a firm and exciting connection to the Mississippi riverfront. Further south, new development can build a new multifamily neighborhood downtown, easily walkable to a multitude of downtown amenities. New development along Walnut Street reinforces the character of Walnut Street as the walkable spine that connects downtown assets from the stores near the interstate to the Mississippi River and parks. Market research and interviews with developers indicate that Monticello's downtown will be of interest to the development community. The City will nevertheless need to take active steps to capitalize on this interest. An assertive public sector role means consideration of actions like site assembly, public financial support, and other steps. Public financial support will be required to attract new development downtown. Market conditions will not bring new development without it. A note on public financial support for development. Cities need to invest in their own renewal, in order to stay viable, and to prevent certain areas from entering a cycle of decline. But the focus and scale of that investment is an important decision point. For Monticello, maintaining the viability and vibrancy of its downtown is a natural and prudent focus of investment. And providing financial support to a small set of catalytic projects represents a scale of investment that is nicely proportionate to the City's overall resources. Three potential catalyst projects are described below, with a recommended approach to implementation for each. City of Monticello Downtown Small Area Plan I Implementation M R Three Catalytic Projects in Downtown Development Site 1—North Half of Block 52 This site is envisioned to be developed as a mixed use development, introducing housing that fronts on the river, and offering a destination restaurant or other prominent retail attraction. It would create a new buzz for downtown Monticello, and draw customer traffic that would support the retailers on Broadway Street. This site has the potential to be highly attractive for a developer, if certain preconditions are present. Development is most likely if: 1. the site can be assembled in single ownership or controlled by a common entity 2. there is a commitment to a special street on the Broadway -to -River block of Walnut Street 3. a entertainment or restaurant entrepreneur/operator is secured in advance for the signature retail space 4. good traffic circulation is maintained around the block, and good access is available to surface parking in the block interior 5. City and public support is present for development at a reasonable density 6. Public financial support is made available The City will need to play a proactive and assertive role to advance these conditions for success. Development Site 2—South half of block between River and Front Streets (Block 1) This site is a premier location for new housing development, given its proximity to the River and riverfront parks. It is well suited to townhome development, or three story development with underground parking—with the latter likely to be more viable financially. It could have larger units, serving families, or smaller units, serving singles, couples and/or seniors. New households in this location would support downtown retail stores, and contributes to the center of energy and activity at River and Walnut. Developing the site requires surmounting some challenges. It is in the Shoreland Mississippi Wild Scenic and Recreational River District which restricts the height of the development unless a variance is granted. The property is in the ownership of three different property owners. And there could be resistance to development at a scale that makes financial sense for a developer. Proactive work should be pursued to mitigate these concerns, through additional site assembly, and continued steps to build public acceptance of new development at a reasonable scale. The development of this site is likely to require public financial support. Development Site 3—Walnut Street between 4th and 5th Street This site is an attractive location for high quality, attractive housing development with underground parking, which fronts on Walnut Street. It would contribute to a high-quality frontage along Walnut Street that makes it feel like a walkable promenade from the river to the freeway. The development could be targeted to empty nesters, millennials, downtown workers, and/or seniors. Proactive work can be pursued to increase development interest. This could entail negotiating the acquisition of the Walnut Street frontage of the Wells Fargo property, and replatting and rezoning the property so that it supports the intended development. A developer will be looking for a sense of City and public support for development at a reasonable density. The development of this site is likely to require public financial support. Retail Vitality Strategies Retail vitality strategies are presented briefly in a preceding section, and in more detail in the attached background report. Some key implementation steps are noted here, which could be considered for initial actions. • Business and property owner engagement. Successful retail vitality efforts are almost always spearheaded through an organized stakeholder group of business and property owners. This group chooses to work collectively and creatively on a set of priority actions. Fostering this collective will is the most essential element in effective action. • Public sector support: Facade Improvement Program and Retail recruitment: Investment of time and financial resources on the part of business owners is enhanced by knowing that it is being supported through a commitment of public sector time and resources. The establishment of a grant program that matches business investments with public funds is a great way to demonstrate that shared commitment. the Plan recommends immediate investment is a facade improvement program and a retail recruitment strategy. Near and Mid Term Projects on City owned Properties A. North Half of Block 52 B. South Half of Block 1 C. Open up Walnut Street, improve Broadway Crossing D. Housing and public parking on block 35 E. Block 34 Development F. Housing on Block 53 G. Redesign of Pine Street with County and MNDOT H. Housing on Block 17 I. Redesign of Riverfront Parks City of Monticello Downtown Small Area Plan I Implementation DOWNTOWN MONTICELLO SMALL AREA PLAN Background Report: Market and Development Context April 2017 TANGIBLE Consulting Services Introduction The purpose of this report is to describe the market and development context that shapes the growth and development of Monticello's downtown district. It provides an overview of the demographic and economic base of Monticello. It looks at market trends and how they could predict future development demands for the downtown district for retail and residential development. It looks at where development opportunities may be located within downtown Monticello. And it documents feedback of the development community about downtown Monticello as a setting for new development. Monticello is a river town, which offers a strategically located crossing of the Mississippi River. The traffic that crosses the river on State Highway 25 both benefits and burdens the City of DOWNTOWN MONTICELLO SMALL AREA PLAN Background Report: Market and Development Context Tangible Consulting Services I April, 2017 Monticello. It provides visibility to the historic downtown area. But it bisects the downtown with road widths and traffic volumes that make it difficult to cross. Downtown Monticello's storefront district on Broadway Street complements the more modern destination retail areas closer to Interstate 94. Monticello is a center of growth, and a local service center, for the surrounding areas. In recent years, Monticello's growth has largely come in the form of single family homes and apartment development at the edges of the City, and in surrounding areas, as well as retail development oriented to Interstate 94. This is true, even as developable land exists in the heart of the downtown area. 4 TANGIBLE CpiIting Services 2 Demographics Monticello has experienced significant growth over the past fifteen years, attracting new households even through the course of the recent economic recession. 140% 120% 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% Population growth (2000-2015) �\`e��o �`,es �ye�o \rae� ��`a\o a�\a5 o��J ey0 � r c ' \oV Source: 2015 ACS 5 -Year Estimates Population and Household Characteristics Comparison cities vary widely in the types of households they support. Monticello has a slightly higher number of family households than the average for the state. Of 4,838 total households in Monticello, family households comprise 69% of total households. This compares with 65% in Minnesota. Broken down further, 31% of all households are married couples with children under 18, 20% married couples without children under 18, and 18% other family compositions. Of the nonfamily households, Monticello has a higher rate of individuals living alone as compared with most of its comparison cities. DOWNTOWN MONTICELLO SMALL AREA PLAN Background Report: Market and Development Context Tangible Consulting Services I April, 2017 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Household Composition ■ Roommates ❑ Living alone ■ Other family ❑ Married -couple without children ■ Married -couple with children Source: 2015 ACS 5 -Year Estimates The average household size in Monticello is a little smaller than most of the comparison cities, but slightly larger than the average for the state. Average household size 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 ',je\o Q\,et ��e�o `rae� J�Sa�o a�\a5 o�c�J eyoca r Source: 2015 ACS 5 -Year Estimates 41 TANGIBLE Consulting Services 3 '10 a�\a5 o1§1 eSo�a ,bQ i \CC C� ��.6N ■ Roommates ❑ Living alone ■ Other family ❑ Married -couple without children ■ Married -couple with children Source: 2015 ACS 5 -Year Estimates The average household size in Monticello is a little smaller than most of the comparison cities, but slightly larger than the average for the state. Average household size 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 ',je\o Q\,et ��e�o `rae� J�Sa�o a�\a5 o�c�J eyoca r Source: 2015 ACS 5 -Year Estimates 41 TANGIBLE Consulting Services 3 Minority population. Monticello has a larger minority population than the comparison cities. However, the minority populations of all of the comparison cities are significantly lower than the minority share of population in Minnesota as a whole. 9% of Monticello's residents are latinos, or non-white, compared to 18% in the state of Minnesota. Monticello has a significant Latino population compared to the comparison cities, comprising 6% of Monticello's total population. 20% 18% 16% 14% 12% 10% 8% 6% 4% 2% 0% Minority Race/Ethnicity �`'��o .rae �`��a\o m 3 Q\a5 oJccJ eyo�a (:5g# 0 1\ z o \co �- ❑Two or more races ■Some other race alone ❑ Hispanic or Latino ❑Asian alone ■ Black or African American alone Source: 2015 ACS 5 -Year Estimates Education Level. The education level of Monticello residents is similar to education levels for Wright County and State of Minnesota. 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Educational Attainment ,,\o�`,ec �ye�o `rae� ��`a\o aQ\a5 oJ�wJ ococa foo �� o � o a°N� r:- �\oo ❑ Less than high school graduate ❑ High school graduate (includes equivalency) ❑ Some college, no degree ■ College degree Source: 2015 ACS 5 -Year Estimates Financial characteristics and employment. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, the median household income in Monticello is $70,254. This is above the state average, whose median household income is $61,492. $100,000 $90,000 $80,000 $70,000 $60,000 $50,000 $40,000 $30,000 $20,000 $10,000 $0 Median household income Source: 2015 ACS 5 -Year Estimates DOWNTOWN MONTICELLO SMALL AREA PLAN Ti Background Report: Market and Development Context NGIBLE Tangible Consulting Services I April, 2017 lting Services 4 \o Pa�\ay L01§1 ce40 oF� Source: 2015 ACS 5 -Year Estimates DOWNTOWN MONTICELLO SMALL AREA PLAN Ti Background Report: Market and Development Context NGIBLE Tangible Consulting Services I April, 2017 lting Services 4 Due to Monticello's location relative to the larger cities of St. Cloud and the Twin Cities, it is unsurprising that many residents of Monticello work outside the city. Of the 6,459 employed residents of Monticello, 82% work outside of Monticello. Monticello should not be considered a bedroom community though. It offers roughly 5,400 jobs, and provides employment to around 4,300 people who live outside the city. 5,294 r -- 'y — Monlicello -' 3,365 h r O All Source: US Census, CnTheMap Housing Characteristics Types of housing. Monticello has a more diverse range of housing options then its comparison cities. Just 54% of Monticello's housing units are single-family homes. 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Housing units by type o�c�J o�owa foo �� O � o a°�� r ( ❑ Mobile home and other ❑Apartment buildings, 10+ units ❑Apartment buildings, 2 - 9 units OTownhomes and condominiums ■Single family homes Source: 2015 ACS 5 -Year Estimates Tenure (ownership/rental status). In light of Monticello's larger diversity of housing types, one might expect a residential market dominated by rental housing. But the share of owner occupied housing is 70%, which is right in the middle of the range of comparison cities. This indicates that the great majority of single family homes and town homes are owner occupied. DOWNTOWN MONTICELLO SMALL AREA PLAN Ti Background Report: Market and Development Context NGIBLE Tangible Consulting Services I April, 2017 lting Services 5 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Housing tenure by unit �y��o ra¢\ 'Kayo aQ\a5 oJ�wJ eyo�a O o° G Renter -occupied housing units: ■ Owner -occupied housing units: Source: 2015 ACS 5 -Year Estimates Home value. Homes in Monticello are slightly more modest in value, in comparison to most of the comparison cities, and the statewide average. $250,000 $200,000 $150,000 $100,000 $50,000 $0 Median Household Value ec e' vo �s¢(�o \'Q J`Kka\o a�\a5 oJccJ eS0 o� � � ��.• baa �`.ao Source: 2015 ACS 5 -Year Estimates DOWNTOWN MONTICELLO SMALL AREA PLAN Ti Background Report: Market and Development Context NGIBLE Tangible Consulting Services I April, 2017 lting Services N. Development Market Overview Residential Market Context The housing market in Monticello has followed the growth of the population of Monticello. Of particular note for the downtown study area is the multifamily housing market, which will be the focus of this section of the report. Average rents per square foot have seen a steady increase in the last five years. Vacancy rates have also steadily gone down, on average. These indicators reflect a high demand for multifamily housing, and they are consistent with market trends of the state of Minnesota. Average Multifamily Rent (psf) $1.10 $1.00 $0.90 12 13 14 15 16 Source: Costar 7% 6% 5% Vacancy rate, multifamily units 4%- 12 13 14 15 16 Source: Costar The map below shows Monticello's apartment developments, as catalogued by Costar. The oldest was built in 1964. Many were built in the DOWNTOWN MONTICELLO SMALL AREA PLAN Background Report: Market and Development Context Tangible Consulting Services I April, 2017 1980s. The newest, Monticello Crossings, is the only apartment development built since the Great Recession. Monticello Crossings is a 210 unit apartment building on the east side of Monticello, just south of Interstate 94. It offers market rate apartments that are rented at around $2 per square foot, which is well above the rents that are charged in any apartment buildings in Monticello. And it has rented up at a rate that met the projections of the developer. The success of this development demonstrates that there is a market demand for apartments in Monticello, some of which could be captured in downtown Monticello. bV _ Ma..iceLlu Ac 0 Co F O <c w Multifamily by year built e4 � 1954 - 1980 cyga _ s� ua n O 1981 -1990 0 1991 -2000 ^" "� Y et► 0 2091-2010 0 8 0 201,-2917 EL Source: Costar Development opportunity analysis. There are a number of areas in downtown Monticello that are good potential locations for new development. 4 TANGIBLE JiCpnsulting Services 7 Properties are more likely to be of interest to developers if they are: • Note fully developed currently • Have relatively low value • Are publicly owned The map below is colored according to the value of properties per square foot, as estimated by the City Assessor. Since darker colors indicate higher value properties, lighter colored properties may elicit more interest by developers. Publicly owned properties are outlined in blue. Development Opportunity Analysis Map Source: City of Monticello Property Records Developer input. Five developers and real estate professionals were interviewed as part of this study. They were: • Bill Gorton, Keller William Commercial Midwest • Bill Beard, The Beard Group • Steve Dunbar, Dunbar Development and Ivy Property • Andy Martin, IRET • Matt Goldstein, Schuett Companies DOWNTOWN MONTICELLO SMALL AREA PLAN Background Report: Market and Development Context Tangible Consulting Services I April, 2017 These people have deep experience in real estate and development. They know Monticello, or cities like Monticello. And they offered a range of insights and perceptions relative to the prospect of attracting new development to downtown Monticello. The interviewees appreciated that there is a cluster of features in downtown Monticello that would be attractive to new development. • The nearness of the Mississippi River, and adjacent parks • The walkable core of storefront buildings • Monticello's community center and library • Vacant land (much of it currently as parking lots) But they also noted impediments to development, such as: • The condition of the storefront buildings • The parking lots that dominate the landscape in certain areas • The lack of recent development, which represents an absence of market indicators for how a new development would perform • The need for land assembly in most development opportunity areas Interviewees noted that development is occurring in the downtown areas of cities like Monticello. And the overall sentiment was that downtown Monticello could capture a share of the housing growth that is occurring in the city. However, development in this environment is more complex. Land values are higher. And development faces greater uncertainties than a similar development of an undeveloped area at the edge of town. For that reason, development in downtown Monticello is likely to require an active public private partnership. Development is most likely to occur when: a) a site can be assembled in single ownership, b) A plan for downtown is adopted, and follow-up actions are taken to 4 TANGIBLE Consulting Services 8 demonstrate a commitment to plan objectives c) Actions are taken to improve building conditions and retail vitality on Broadway Street d) City and public support for development at a reasonable density is present. e) There is an understanding that a reasonable level of public financial support will be required, especially for the first development initiatives If these conditions are present, there is likely to be interest on the part of the development community, in doing high quality development in downtown Monticello that meets the goals of the community. DOWNTOWN MONTICELLO SMALL AREA PLAN Ti Background Report: Market and Development Context NGIBLE Tangible Consulting Services I April, 2017 lting Services 0 Retail Market Context Much of the newer retail development in Monticello has been highway oriented retail, near Interstate 94. There has been little new retail development in the downtown study area. Retail rents have seen some fluctuations in recent years, but today remain stable. Vacancy rates have seen a very significant decrease, associated with the recovering and growing economy. Average Retail Rents (per square foot) $16 12 13 14 15 16 Source: Costar Retail Vacancy Rate 15% 10% .................... 5% ..................................................................................... . it % . U 12 13 14 15 18 Source: Costar DOWNTOWN MONTICELLO SMALL AREA PLAN Background Report: Market and Development Context Tangible Consulting Services I April, 2017 The yellow bars of the Retail Absorption and Deliveries chart indicate a high level of retail absorption over the last five years. In other words, existing retail space has been filling up. That trend, along with additional population growth, may have provided the basis for the development of new retail space in 2013, 2015, and 2016—as represented by the blue bars in of the chart. Retail Absorption and Deliveries n nn 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 = A6soiptian = Deliveries — Vacancy Source: Costar Geographic context. Monticello's retail areas are situated in a regional context, competing against the shopping areas in other nearby cities. One way of understanding that context is looking at the locations of shopping centers in the surrounding area. The following chart shows shopping centers in the area around Monticello, by type of shopping center. The larger types of shopping centers are illustrated with larger circles on the map. TANGIBLE CKiIting Services 10 City an c!a l e �j Maple aite Shopping Center Type • strip Center Q Neighborhood Center • Community Center • Cutlet Center • Power Center Retail Context Map ker Sand Dunes State Fo m at 1 i \ V ®on trose Source: Costar, Tangible Consulting Services Retail stores in downtown Monticello compete to some degree with the highway oriented retail stores that are near Interstate 94, and with the retail areas in nearby communities. But they also offer something that is distinct from those retail areas—a different retail landscape which sets them apart and makes them unique. Their sidewalk facing storefronts, and density of offerings, makes them pedestrian oriented. The 7:kford ich U u aple rove older buildings are part of the historic legacy of Monticello, and make good spaces for retail entrepreneurs and local businesses. Because they are a slightly different animal than the highway oriented retail in Monticello, there is an opportunity to capitalize on this unique character to improve the customer traffic, retail mix, and vibrancy of the area. DOWNTOWN MONTICELLO SMALL AREA PLAN Ti Background Report: Market and Development Context NGIBLE Tangible Consulting Services I April, 2017 lting Services 11 DOWNTOWN MONTICELLO SMALL AREA PLAN Background Report: Retail Vitality April 2017 TANGIBLE Consulting Services Introduction This report considers and assesses the vitality of offered on postcards that asked about desirable downtown Monticello's retail district. This report futures, and from a questionnaire about focuses on the traditional storefront district, the downtown Monticello's strengths and primary walkable retail area downtown. This area weaknesses. We also benefitted from a steering is centered on the intersection of Broadway Street committee survey specifically focused on retail and Walnut Street. It encompasses the area in vitality. pink in the map at right—specifically, the two blocks of Broadway Street between Pine Street and Locust Street, and the two blocks of Walnut Street evelopm reas between River Street and 3rd st—fron it Frontage Street. �VHousing Frontage Downtown Monticello is a �� High..yoriented Retail desirable place for people to spend time. It offers a = traditional compact storefront ti� district, just a block from the Mississippi River and park, and several blocks from the city's lively community center and library. R pyy�Y y Today while some attractive ` a g and successful businesses are Q located in downtown Monticello's storefront district, it projects the air of a place that once was a spirited center ¢� of Monticello but is now tired 4TH and unsure of its identity. As people's preferences for shopping, dining out and recreating are shifting, sTH Monticello has an opportunity to draw on the inherent distinctiveness of its downtown \ / to shape a future that will I� I position it as a local and regional destination. Sources of information. We draw on three sources of information for this report: public input, market context, and our own observations. We reviewed the responses from public input DOWNTOWN MONTICELLO SMALL AREA PLAN Background Report: Retail VitalityTi NGIBLE April, 2017 lting Services 2 National Retail Trends and Context The retail landscape is changing rapidly. Department stores are closing. Discount retail stores are increasing. As lives get busier, people do more shopping online, and when they actually go out to shop people want an experience — it's about more than just purchasing a product. But traditional, storefront -style retail Downtown Monticello Overview Monticello has a traditional downtown area, with storefronts that face the street. It is walkable, and is just a block or two from the Mississippi River. In the past it was the heart of the City's commercial activity. As in many small towns throughout Minnesota and the USA, it has been impacted by the development of competing commercial areas. These areas, near areas still have Survey Responses Interstate 94 and something to offer. Downtown Monticello Assets along Pine Street/Hwy The small spaces they 25, are the result of offer are ideal for local • Strong local businesses highway development, businesses and start- • Some of the traditional unique downtown population growth in car -oriented ups. They offer a place retail area is intact neighborhoods, and for businesses that can't afford the rents • Library and community center the changing in newer retail • Walkability of Broadway and Walnut requirements of developments, or can't • Proximity of Mississippi River national retailers, fill the large spaces in • Available sites for new housing which are not auto -oriented strip areas. Furthermore, people still shop. People want to try things out, or see and hold items, before they purchase them. Physical stores are social places where customers interact with others. People want to go out to businesses where they see people enjoying themselves, and where they can run into friends and neighbors, while drinking, dining, working out, or purchasing daily items close to home. The opportunity for downtown Monticello is to provide people with an experience. A future downtown Monticello may provide a place where many more people are shopping, eating, sitting by the Mississippi River, walking, biking and socializing. In the context of this new national retail reality, downtown Monticello has the bones to be a destination retail area. DOWNTOWN MONTICELLO SMALL AREA PLAN Background Report: Retail Vitality April, 2017 supported by the small buildings downtown. This has led to less investment in downtown Monticello, and a languishing of some of the properties, as well as a muddled and uncertain identity. This ambiguous identity was reflected in the responses to a survey question about downtown Monticello. When asked to outline downtown on a map, Monticello residents identified a variety of different areas. All included the Broadway and Walnut intersection, but some included: ♦ Just the buildings that front on Broadway Street between Pine and Locust Streets ♦ The four blocks that abut Broadway and Walnut Streets ♦ The four blocks that abut Broadway and Pine Streets ♦ A six -block area between Locust Street and Cedar Street Some included the Mississippi River in downtown, but no one included the library and community TANGIBLE Consulting Services 3 center—despite noting that these destinations are ♦ The blocks along Pine Street/Hwy 25—which is primary reasons for many to go downtown. fronted with auto -oriented retail stores. It's understandable that downtown Monticello is This background report is focused on the retail not easily identified. It is comprised of a number district that is centered on Broadway and Walnut of distinct areas: Streets, because that's ♦ The riverfront Public In ut and River Street p the center of which face the Downtown Monticello Barriers Monticello's Mississippi pedestrian River • Not enough retail businesses oriented, ♦ The storefront • Need more restaurants and coffee shops to storefront - style retail compliment retail businesses style retail area p area. Such centered on • Not enough housing nearby — more residents means areas have Broadway and larger customer base different walnut streets . Environment needs to be and feel safer for requirements ♦ The blocks pedestrians and benefit along Walnut from different Street that policies and connect the Broadway Street corridor to the activities than more modern, mall -oriented retail. heavily used library and community center, and the Cargill plant, which is downtown Nearby areas can complement and support Monticello's largest employer Broadway Street's storefront retail district. DOWNTOWN MONTICELLO SMALL AREA PLAN Background Report: Retail VitalityTi NGIBLE April, 2017 lting Services 4 Retail Vitality Assessment In assessing conditions in pedestrian oriented retail areas, it's helpful to look at several aspects of the area. The business mix, and the number (or density) of retail stores, are helpful ways of looking at what the retail district offers, in terms of shopping, dining, or other attractions. Another set of measures is focused on the character of the area, and the degree to which its elements offer an attractive and comfortable environment for people to come to. The following elements are considered below, because they are known to be critical factors in building the character of pedestrian oriented retail areas: ♦ Walkability ♦ Sense of Safety ♦ Visual Identity and Branding ♦ Public Realm Conditions ♦ Business Conditions Business Density and Mix Business density refers to the concentration of businesses in the area. When businesses are concentrated (i.e. there are more businesses per block, for example), it is easier to walk among them and to visit several during one trip. Higher density of businesses also creates a vibrant environment that can feel busy and active with signs, storefront displays, and perhaps outdoor seating. It is an environment that is scaled to people walking by rather than driving by. The two blocks of Broadway Street have a high density of businesses. It is a concentrated retail area. Business Establishments Per 500 feet 12 10 s 6 4 2 0 `ea\ �aA. ee\ tee\ ee\ 1;? aJ �t0 e\\o\ \`e\\o �o <\> '11110&115 ,Z\e Source: Tangible Consulting Services Business mix refers to the assortment of businesses and business types that make up a retail district. Neighborhood Goods and services S Post Office ® •General Merchandise, Apparel, Accessories • Food and Reierages O• Non -Retail Destinations •Non Contributing Businesses © 39 ray Kwik /vPrSYF ar Wash J Bee B$dy's Walgreens • s�� •®� �aySt ® • yStE OMaylag Laundry • Q Muntrcello mn© ® a� ?rady's Ace H *ware fy3rry5't •. Monticello • Motor Vehicles 1 3�dsrF • Petersr �. Bank Branch Fur Q Source: Tangible Consulting Services The mix matters because businesses perform different roles in a district. Some draw nearby residents on a regular basis. Others serve as destinations and attract people from the region as well as the local area. Some businesses generate DOWNTOWN MONTICELLO SMALL AREA PLAN Background Report: Retail VitalityTi NGIBLE April, 2017 lting Services 5 a lot of foot traffic. Others have no walk-up customers at all. Business Mix in Storefront Districts 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% ❑ Non -Contributing ■ Non -Retail Destinaton ■ Food and Beverage ❑ Neighborhood Good's and Services ■ General Merchandise, Apparel, Accessories Source: Tangible Consulting Services garden, furniture, grocery store, brand clothing store, sporting goods. Neighborhood Goods and Services refers to retailers that offer goods and services that serve a more local market: dry cleaner, pharmacy, convenient grocery store. Food and Beverage refers to restaurants, coffee shops, bars and nightclubs. Non -Retail Destination refers to businesses that do not sell goods but generate walk-in traffic, such as studios, or cultural institutions. Non -Contributing refers to ground floor offices that generate little to no walk-up traffic. Storefront districts can have different flavors. Some offer more restaurants and entertainment than shopping. Shopping areas can serve as destinations, or cater to local needs. They can offer Observations. Monticello has a good mix of businesses both in the broader study area as well as in the two block area of Broadway. And the establishments are highly concentrated. There are fewer general merchandise and apparel establishments than in Elk River and Buffalo, and more establishments providing neighborhood goods and services. Food and beverage businesses make up a large part of successful retail districts today, and Monticello has a much lower percentage of them than the comparison In the chart above, we compare Monticello (both areas. the study area and the two blocks of storefront Feedback from the public input made very clear businesses on Broadway the desire for more food Street) with the and beverage storefront -style retail Public Input establishments. On a areas in Elk River and Business Mix five point scale, with 1 Buffalo—as well as in being "poor" and 5 being Madison, Wisconsin, What do people want downtown? "excellent", survey where we've done a • More restaurants recent retail inventory. . Local cafe The categories are significant. General Merchandise, Apparel, Accessories refers to retail businesses that serve a broader market area: big box discount stores, home and • Ice cream • Pottery shop • Wine bar • Indoor archery club • Health and wellness shop • Local music at restaurants respondents gave the downtown business mix mostly 2's and 3's. Challenges. It is advantageous for a retail district to have some destination retail businesses (General Merchandise, Apparel, Accessories) because DOWNTOWN MONTICELLO SMALL AREA PLAN Background Report: Retail VitalityTi NGIBLE April, 2017 lting Services 6 aha °c\ O° oa � eta ��\ t�Li `yo \°e hoc 0 c��Ge\\° �o ❑ Non -Contributing ■ Non -Retail Destinaton ■ Food and Beverage ❑ Neighborhood Good's and Services ■ General Merchandise, Apparel, Accessories Source: Tangible Consulting Services garden, furniture, grocery store, brand clothing store, sporting goods. Neighborhood Goods and Services refers to retailers that offer goods and services that serve a more local market: dry cleaner, pharmacy, convenient grocery store. Food and Beverage refers to restaurants, coffee shops, bars and nightclubs. Non -Retail Destination refers to businesses that do not sell goods but generate walk-in traffic, such as studios, or cultural institutions. Non -Contributing refers to ground floor offices that generate little to no walk-up traffic. Storefront districts can have different flavors. Some offer more restaurants and entertainment than shopping. Shopping areas can serve as destinations, or cater to local needs. They can offer Observations. Monticello has a good mix of businesses both in the broader study area as well as in the two block area of Broadway. And the establishments are highly concentrated. There are fewer general merchandise and apparel establishments than in Elk River and Buffalo, and more establishments providing neighborhood goods and services. Food and beverage businesses make up a large part of successful retail districts today, and Monticello has a much lower percentage of them than the comparison In the chart above, we compare Monticello (both areas. the study area and the two blocks of storefront Feedback from the public input made very clear businesses on Broadway the desire for more food Street) with the and beverage storefront -style retail Public Input establishments. On a areas in Elk River and Business Mix five point scale, with 1 Buffalo—as well as in being "poor" and 5 being Madison, Wisconsin, What do people want downtown? "excellent", survey where we've done a • More restaurants recent retail inventory. . Local cafe The categories are significant. General Merchandise, Apparel, Accessories refers to retail businesses that serve a broader market area: big box discount stores, home and • Ice cream • Pottery shop • Wine bar • Indoor archery club • Health and wellness shop • Local music at restaurants respondents gave the downtown business mix mostly 2's and 3's. Challenges. It is advantageous for a retail district to have some destination retail businesses (General Merchandise, Apparel, Accessories) because DOWNTOWN MONTICELLO SMALL AREA PLAN Background Report: Retail VitalityTi NGIBLE April, 2017 lting Services 6 they bring non -local people to the area. In addition, restaurants, coffee shops, ice cream shops are critical elements of a retail district because they offer shoppers a second (or third) place to stop, or as destinations which draw patrons to the area, who secondarily may browse in neighboring shops. Downtown Monticello has few of these types of establishments. Opportunities. The density of businesses on Broadway Street is high, making it a fine-grained storefront district. It is a unique walkable retail area that has the elements from which a strong destination retail area can grow. Improving the business mix by attracting new businesses, particularly more food and beverage establishments or destination retailers, could be an important revitalization strategy. And maintaining the density of buildings along Broadway will be critical to maintaining its identity. Walkability Challenges. A lot of automobile traffic passes through downtown. At certain times of the day the traffic backs up on Broadway Street. This volume of traffic makes some pedestrians feel unsafe. There are also a few gaps between buildings which detract from the continuity of the is the district. Opportunities. Downtown's inherent layout is perfect for walking. There are sidewalks, storefronts that line the sidewalks and places to go. There is adequate parking, both on street and off, so that people can park and walk to a destination easily. More visual interest and activation would enrich the environment and make it more comfortable for pedestrians on the street. Activation could mean adding cafes or restaurants with sidewalk seating, or introducing pop-up retail business. It could also mean turning gaps between buildings into places of activity. They could be used as connections to the rear parking areas, or enhanced with seating or a parklet. Public Input Observations. Walkability and Sense of Safety Broadway and Walnut Streets are highly . Create walking tour map walkable. On Broadway, 0 Add flower boxes to keep bike lanes the buildings extend to the sidewalk and have safe few gaps between them, creating a fine-grained retail storefront environment. And many of the buildings have large windows that front the street, which draw one's eyes into the store and enhance the ease of walking by. Corner properties at Broadway and Walnut draw people around the corner. The properties at Broadway and Pine anchor that intersection less well. Walkability was valued by those who responded to our Retail Vitality Survey. It was identified as an important element of what people want downtown. It was rated fair to good by respondents, being scored 3 or 4 (out of 5) by most survey respondents. One respondent suggested creating a walking tour map for downtown. Attention should also be paid to maintaining the density of storefronts, and avoiding any reduction. Sense of Safety Observations. Perceptions of personal safety seem to be good, but safety from traffic is a significant issue. Survey respondents split their scores on "Sense of Safety" between 2's and 4's. They gave scores of 2's and 3's to "Traffic Flow and Speed" received 2's and 3's. The traffic signals at Broadway and Pine, and the stop signs on Walnut at Broadway, are helpful. But they are not sufficient to address the problems. Challenges. There is a tension between moving along the traffic that builds up on Broadway at certain times of the day and keeping that traffic moving at speeds that create a comfortable pedestrian environment, and ensuring that traffic stops for pedestrians. Turn lanes help move traffic but they can make the street harder to DOWNTOWN MONTICELLO SMALL AREA PLAN Background Report: Retail VitalityTi NGIBLE April, 2017 lting Services 7 cross and the sidewalks feel narrower. In addition, Pine Street, a state highway, carries 35,000 cars per day over the Mississippi River (MNDOT, 2014) and through Monticello's downtown. Pine Street brings people to downtown, yet it is a challenge to create a transition from downtown's retail district to the six lane intersection of Broadway and Pine. Opportunities. Downtown's layout is inherently pedestrian oriented. Sidewalk widths are adequate for making pedestrians feel safe. The brick cross -walks at Broadway and Walnut help notify drivers that there are pedestrians in the area. The median on Broadway could be enhanced at the intersection with Walnut and the sidewalk corners could be bumped out to make crossing safer. Balancing traffic and pedestrian needs is difficult and ongoing, but all measures should aim at shoring up the retail vitality of the downtown area. Visual Identity and Branding Downtown Monticello has building and streetscaping elements that could be leveraged to build the visual branding of the area—most notably the streetscaping that was installed in the early 2000s. But there is little sign of additional coordination related to district identity. In our survey, respondents gave "Downtown's Brand/Identity" 1's, 2's and 3's. It received no 4's or 5's. Challenges. While downtown Monticello has a fine-grained retail character, and is a unique feature in Monticello and the surrounding area, it does not impart the sense of a unified place, as opposed to a collection of individual commercial buildings. Most buildings are from a similar era, but they are quite varied in style and materials. This means other elements must be employed to create that sense of place, to visually pull the area together. Unifying elements could include building elements such as awnings, planters, or exterior lighting. It could also build on some collective themes related to color, texture, or art. DOWNTOWN MONTICELLO SMALL AREA PLAN Background Report: Retail Vitality April, 2017 TANGIBLE Consulting Services 8 Opportunities. Monticello has a starting point on Observations. Many successful retail streets have Broadway Street, in the fine grain density of its a recognizable visual character that is memorable storefronts. That is the basis for downtown's and vivid. Various patterns in the physical brand and the core of what makes it unique and environment can contribute to this character, desirable. While buildings may be of different including: styles and materials, this ♦ Building architecture variety also offersPUbIIC In put p and materials interest and authenticity. Identity and Branding There are some gaps in ♦ The historical era of these storefront construction • Improve the lighting buildings, and the ♦ The scale of buildings • Add flowers condition of some of the ♦ The "grain," or • Create a park -like setting buildings makes them density, of vulnerable to a storefronts renovation or ♦ Streetscaping elements redevelopment that might interrupt this fine grain. It would be important to establish ♦ Building accessories, such as signage, awnings development guidelines for infill buildings, so that or exterior lighting the unique character of the district is preserved. Marketing and branding efforts can build on these Marketing. Marketing activities are extremely physical characteristics, building the retail important in building the brand identity and district's image in the minds of potential customer base of storefront commercial areas. customers. This can encompass a broad range of activities and events. The Monticello Chamber of DOWNTOWN MONTICELLO SMALL AREA PLAN Background Report: Retail Vitality April, 2017 TANGIBLE Consulting Services 8 Commerce plays a lead role in current marketing initiatives, and is well positioned to lead additional efforts and activities. Public Realm Conditions: Observations. It is evident that attention Pu has been paid to the Public R streetscape along Broadway. The trees, . Add benches pedestrian -scaled . Create walki ornamental street lights, and sidewalk bump -outs area with ornamental • Identify con fencing—these are • Mark histori features that invite people to walk, linger, and look in store windows. On the flip side, the streetscaping appears a little dated, and would benefit from a fresh round of upgrades. Respondents to the Retail Vitality Survey rated the "Cleanliness" of downtown highly, giving it 3's and 4's. Along with "Walkability" and "Parking Availability", this was the highest rated element. They rated downtown lower for "Attractiveness," with most scoring it a 2 or a 3. Challenges. Improving the public realm takes resources. And it takes energy to create the common vision for a new look. There are competing priorities for sidewalk area along Broadway Street. At this point in time, sidewalks are sufficiently wide to support pedestrian movement in a vibrant commercial area. But if the road were to be widened to ease traffic congestion, sidewalks would be P narrowed, to the detriment of the Buildi commercial district. • Kevitalize Opportunities. It is . Use wood clear that the community values the • Keep up b public areas along Broadway. Updating and enhancing its streetscaping would improve the attractiveness of the area. It also demonstrates a public commitment to the area, that could leverage additional private and business investment. There is also an opportunity to claim the areas Balm between buildings for public space, either in bllc Input connecting the Conditions businesses to the parking at rear, or for public , trees, more flowers elements that invite human activity, such as ng routes through the seating areas and plazas. These spaces could be nections to the river enhanced with public art, c sites and they could host events or activities. Business and Building Conditions: Observations. Building conditions in downtown retail areas have a significant impact on how the area is perceived. The buildings in downtown Monticello vary greatly in style, size and condition. There are one and two story buildings intermixed. Most have large picture windows on the first floor, though a few do not. Some second story facades have windows facing the street, while others are blank walls. Some appear in good condition. Others do not. Treatments of windows, signage and displays varies greatly as well. Most survey respondents scored "Business Upkeep" a 3 of 5. Challenges. With PL Input building styles so varied, the condition of buildings ng Conditions becomes even more important in unifying the downtown buildings district. It is also and metal necessary to attend to uildings deferred maintenance, and renovation where possible in order to preserve the fine-grained pattern of buildings and DOWNTOWN MONTICELLO SMALL AREA PLAN Background Report: Retail VitalityTi NGIBLE April, 2017 lting Services 9 storefronts. But we know that the collective investment needed in the buildings on Broadway Street may be quite significant. In buildings that are occupied and cash -flowing for the property owner, it can be difficult to justify tackling these improvements on a strictly market basis. Moreover, the expectations established by the previous planning process has led to disinvestment, because it proposed the eventual demolition of the storefront district. It will take some effort to build or restore a collective intent among property and business owners to reinvest in their buildings. And some outside financial incentives will probably also be needed to advance this goal. DOWNTOWN MONTICELLO SMALL AREA PLAN Background Report: Retail Vitality April, 2017 Opportunities. Downtown Monticello has a variety of businesses, and almost all storefronts are full and activate the street. There are some minor improvements that would go a long way — for example some basic guidelines for what signs should look like. Programs to improve the quality of storefront displays might also be a relatively low-cost way to build the attractiveness of the street and draw people into the businesses. TANGIBLE Consulting Services 10 Recommendations Downtown Monticello has the potential to be a commercial and activity destination for the City of Monticello and surrounding areas. The small area plan will offer a range of strategies to that end. A focus on retail vitality should be seen as a very important component of the overall revitalization initiative. While some retail vitality activities and programs can be costly, many are not—especially when compared with the cost of attracting large new development, or taking significant action to calm traffic behavior on the major thoroughfares that cross through the City. The following strategies are suggested as priorities for increasing the retail vitality of downtown Monticello, and enhancing its destination quality. Downtown Environment ♦ Make it easier and more inviting to walk to the downtown core by improving connections between the downtown core and the community center and library to the south, and the parks and river to the north, so that visitors to any part of downtown find it easy to get to the Broadway storefront district. ♦ Improve the pedestrian environment by adding stop signs and crosswalks at Broadway and Walnut; making it more comfortable to cross Pine Street at the Broadway intersection; and modernize and beautify streetscape treatments. District Identity ♦ Build Downtown's brand/identity: identify downtown as the Broadway Walnut area, and name it ♦ Consider the development of some visual themes for the district that will contribute to a sense of identity as buildings are improved and enhanced. ♦ Commit to the fine-grained character of the storefronts along Broadway and around the corner on Walnut. Establish appropriate design guidelines for the area, prevent interruption of this character, fill in gaps, and attend to building disrepair to prevent demolition. DOWNTOWN MONTICELLO SMALL AREA PLAN Background Report: Retail Vitality April, 2017 Consider organizational growth to sharpen the focus on the Broadway Walnut area—either within existing organizations, or in a new one. The organizational focus should be on promoting the area as a whole, and identify things all businesses can do together to make the area a destination and generate interest ♦ Activate sidewalks and plaza areas as much as possible, through outdoor seating, engaging public spaces, events, and so forth—so that the vibrancy of the area is visible to passersby. Business Support and Development ♦ Consider the establishment of a program that supports architectural assessment of buildings, and offers financial support for rehabilitation investments that stabilize and enhance existing buildings ♦ Consider the establishment of a fagade improvement programs that offers financial support for investments that improve the visual appearance of buildings and district identity ♦ Consider offering support for merchandising, with the goals of improving the attractiveness of window displays and store interiors ♦ Address the quality of the store mix through initiating a retail recruitment program for the district, which would identify and attract key retailers that will be complementary to the existing stores ♦ Increase housing in the downtown area. Growth in the number of people living in and around downtown will support neighborhood - scale retail (retail follows rooftops); and, a range of household types will contribute to greater diversity of retail stores as well as dining establishments TANGIBLE Consulting Services 11 The future vision for Monticello provides the foundation for the Comprehensive Plan (the vision statement appears in Chapter 1). The Land Use Plan, in turn, provides the framework for how land will be used to help achieve the future vision for Monticello. The Land Use Plan seeks to reinforce desirable land use patterns, identify places where change is needed and guide the form and location of future growth. The Land Use Plan for Monticello was shaped by a variety of factors, including: ➢ Community input gathered through public workshops and Task Force discussions. ➢ The existing built and natural environment in Monticello. ➢ The vision for Monticello's future. ➢ Factors described in the Community Context chapter of the Plan. ➢ Systems plans for transportation, sanitary sewer and water supply. This represents a departure in form from the 1996 Comprehensive Plan. The 1996 Plan included the land use plan as part of a broader Development Framework section. The 1996 Plan described Monticello's land use plan by general district of the community as a means of attending to the unique issues in each district. The 2008 Update of the Comprehensive Plan establishes a separate land use chapter consisting of the following components: ➢ A section on Future Growth describes the implications of future resident growth and the amount of growth anticipated by the Plan. ➢ The Land Use Plan Map (see Figure 3-2) shows the land uses assigned to each parcel of land. ➢ Land Use Categories further explain the Land Use Plan by describing the land uses depicted in the Map. This section includes land use policies describe the objectives that Monticello seeks to achieve through the implementation of the Land Use Plan and the supporting elements of the Comprehensive Plan. of manufacturing, processing, warehousing, distribution and related businesses. 5. Places to Work may include non -industrial businesses that provide necessary support to the underlying development objectives of this land use. Examples of supporting land uses include lodging, office supplies and repair services. Additional public objectives and strategies for Places to Work can be found in the Economic Development chapter. Places to Shop Places to Shop designate locations that are or can be developed with businesses involved with the sale of goods and services. Places to Shop may include offices for service businesses. Places to Shop guides land uses that are both local and regional in nature. Policies - Places to Shop In guiding land uses for Places to Shop, the Comprehensive Plan seeks to: 1 2. 3 4. 5 W 7 The Comprehensive Plan seeks to attract and retain businesses that provide goods and services needed by Monticello residents. The Comprehensive Plan seeks to capture the opportunity for commercial development that serves a broader region. Places to Shop with a regional orientation should be located where the traffic does not disadvantage travel within Monticello. Commercial development will be used to expand and diversify the local property tax base and as an element of a diverse supply of local jobs. Places to Shop will be located on property with access to the street capacity needed to support traffic from these businesses. Each parcel should supply an adequate supply of parking that makes it convenient to obtain the goods and services. Building materials, facades and signage should combine with public improvements to create an attractive setting. Site design must give consideration to defining edges and providing buffering or separation between the commercial parcel and adjacent residential uses. The Co Welrensw Plan describes issues plans and pobesrelated to ft Downtown h sevealsedans offt Ran. These policies help to create sustainable locations for Places to Shop in a manner that enhances Monticello. Downtown The Embracing Downtown Plan was adopted by City Council resolution 2012-011 on January 9, 2012 awl is here -in J6 an eWCff k- ,ef d*e- EenTr-ehensive Plan. The City embarked on an update to the Downtown Plan in 2017 and the Downtown Small Area Plan was adopted by City Council resolution 2017 -OXY on September 251, 2017 and is herein incorporated as an appendix of the Comprehensive Plan. Downtown is a unique commercial district that is part of Monticello's heritage and identity. It is, however, no longer possible for Downtown to be Monticello's central business district. The mass of current and future commercial development south of Interstate 94 along TH 25 and in east Monticello along interstate 94 have replaced the downtown area as primary shopping districts. The future success of downtown requires it to be a place unlike any other in Monticello. The Comprehensive Plan seeks to achieve the Vision, eiples and Goals described in the Embr-ae Downtown Small Area Plan. Downtown is intended to be a mix of inter -related and mutually supportive land uses. Businesses involved with the sale of goods and services should be the focus of Downtown land use. Residential development facilitates reinvestment and places potential customers in the Downtown area. Civic uses draw in people from across the community. g the planning process, the potential for allowing ➢ Encourage Small and Medium Scaled commercial activity to extend easterly out of the Investments Downtown along Broadway was discussed. The Comprehensive Plan consciously defines Cedar Street as ➢ Become a River Town the eastern edge of Downtown for two basic reasons: (1) Downtown should be successful and sustainable Policies/Guiding Principles — Downtown before new areas of competition are created; and 1. Downtown is a special and unique part of (2) The Comprehensive Plan seeks to maintain and Monticello. It merits particular attention in the enhance the integrity of residential neighborhoods Comprehensive Plan and in future efforts to east of Downtown. achieve community plans and objectives. 2. Downtown is intended to be an inter -connected and More than any other land use category, Downtown has supportive collection of land uses. Thi rcirmiry strong connections to other parts of the Comprehensive fimetion of Dowt4evm i3 ca a ,.,.V...... er-ei , dist iet Plan. Therefore, the City has adopted the E'.nbn%.-�r:g n+� Lland uses should support and enhance the Downtown Small Area Plan as its guiding planning overall objectives for Downtown. document for the Downtown. The following parts of the 3. The City will build on core assets of greater Comprehensive Plan also address community desires Downtown Monticello as identified in the and plans for the Downtown area: Egg Downtown Small Area Plan. These ➢ The Land Use chapter contains a specific assets include the preponderance of civic focus area on Downtown. The focus area activity, proximity to the river, a grid of streets contains a more detailed discussion of the and small blocks, and a varied building stock — issues facing the Downtown and potential both old and new. public actions needed to address these issues. 4. A shared vision among property owners, business ➢ The operation of the street system is a critical owners and the City is the foundation for effective factor for the future of Downtown. The team work and long term success. Transportation chapter of the Comprehensive 5. A shared understanding of realistic market potential Plan and the Transportation chapter Framework is the foundation for design and generation of a oftheEmbr-aeing Downtown Small Area Plan healthy business mix of land uses. This includes influence the ability of residents to travel to both residential and non-residential land uses. Downtown and the options for mitigating the impacts of traffic on Highway 25 and other Housing in the core blocks is encouraged to be Downtown streets. medium density (apartments or townhouses) and ➢ The Parks chapter of the Comprehensive Plan to face the perimeter of the blocks and be and the Parks & Open Space Framework of Pedestrian friendly, either with street level the Downtown Small Area Plan provides for commercial uses or with doors, stoops, porches, parks in the Downtown and the trail systems plazas, or other features that face the sidewalk_. that allow people to reach Downtown on foot 6. A safe, attractive human scale environment and or bicycle. entrepreneurial businesses that actively emphasize ➢ The Economic Development chapter of the personal customer service will differentiate Comprehensive Plan and the Financial Downtown from other shopping districts. Implementation ehapter guide of the Fi:��ar:g-Downtown Small Area Plan lay 7• Property values can be enhanced if property the foundation for public actions and owners and the City share a vision for Downtown investments that will be needed to achieve the and actively seek to cultivate a safe, appealing desired outcomes. environment and attractive business mix of inter- related uses. Goals — Downtown 8. Housing in the Downtown can facilitate ➢ Improve Pine Street for all users. necessary redevelopment and bring potential customers directly into the area. Housing may be ➢ Shift the center of Downtown to Broadway and freestanding or in shared buildings with street Walnut Streets level commercial uses. 9. Downtown is the civic center of Monticello. To the degree possible, unique public facilities (such as the Community Center, the Library and the Post Office) should be located in the Downtown area as a means to bring people into the Downtown. 10. Downtown should emphasize connections with the Mississippi River that are accessible by the public. It is especially important to design Broadway so it is easy and safe to cross as a pedestrian or cyclist — with an emphasis on Walnut and Cedar Street. 11. Downtown should be a pedestrian -oriented place in a manner that cannot be matched by other commercial districts. Pedestrian scale is achieved at the scale of both the block and the building. Blocks should reflect the historic fabric of the City and buildings should present a pedestrian friendly facade to the sidewalk. 12. Downtown should have an adequate supply of free parking for customers distributed throughout the area. The Downtown should be well connected so customers are comfortable walking 1-2 blocks from their car to their destination. 13. The City and business community must work actively with MnDOT and Wright County to ensure safe local access to btisi ess dist the downtown. 3-14 1 Land Use City of Monticello All of these policies work together to attract people to Downtown and to enhance the potential for a successful business Downtown environment. At theinterseetio,, of Bt:oadway rd Pira Etreets, parking lots may be eenstpaeted only when all of req wnb limit th8 abil4y to eemply with l,.,,atio,, s+.,,,a.,,.& „f thin Pyr.. • At least fifty (50) per-eent of either the by a building -(non pankingarea). • An altefnati�ve veAieal element is l,,eate,a at. the saee—aamc. This elemmt snwa� determined by City O ffieials •1,, v&tablid'i an arehiteeturally eompatible Eerner- pr-esenee-. Stich e 2; m;r;4nel-tido, but fx t -be limited to pabiio art, int , afehiteo-\01 bwnosz s}grn, and , ehitv„t,,,-all apMp iat Mixed Use The Mixed Use is a transition area between the Downtown and the hospital campus. It has been created in recognition of the unique nature of this area. The area serves two functions. It is the edge between long-term residential neighborhoods and a major transportation corridor (Broadway Street). It is also a link between the Downtown, the hospital campus and the east interchange retail area. The primary goal of this land use is to preserve and enhance housing in this part of Monticello. Any non- residential development should be designed to minimize the impacts on and conflicts with adjacent neighborhoods. Policies - Mixed Use 1. Development should not have direct access to Broadway street. Access should come from side street. 2. Non-residential development should be limited to small retail, service and office businesses. The scale, character and site design should be compatible with the adjacent residential neighborhoods. 3. All non-residential development will be oriented to Broadway Street and not to 3rd Street or River Street. 4. Commercial development compatible with the Downtown should be encouraged to locate there. 5. More intense housing and commercial uses may be allowed if directly related to the hospital. Places to Recreate Places to Recreate consist of public parks and private recreation facilities. The land uses are essential elements of the quality of life in Monticello. The Parks and Trails chapter of the Comprehensive Plan describes the current park and trail system and the future plan to maintain and enhance this system. The Comprehensive Plan is only one aspect of managing the land use for public parks and private recreation facilities. The City's zoning regulations place these locations into a zoning district. Often, the purpose of the zoning district is to guide private development, such as housing. Under current State Law, zoning regulations "trump" the Land Use Plan and govern the use of land. With the potential for the redevelopment of golf courses, it is important the Comprehensive Plan and other land use controls work in concert to achieve the desired outcomes. The City's plans and policies for parks, trails and open space can be found in the Parks chapter of the Comprehensive Plan Places for Community Places for Community consist of public and semipublic land uses. Public uses include all governmental facilities (city, county, state and federal) and schools. This category also applies to churches, cemeteries, hospitals, and other institutional uses. It is important to note that these land uses relate only to existing land uses. The Comprehensive Plan does not guide the location of new churches, schools, public buildings and other institutional land uses. Places for 2008 Comprehensive Plan — Updated 2014 Land Use 13-15 The Comprehensive Plan shows the area as Places to Recreate based on the continued use as a golf course. This designation does not preclude a future proposal and Comprehensive Plan amendment for residential development. It is likely, however, that this scale of new development will require the access provided by a new highway interchange. The Comprehensive Plan seeks to fill in other development areas and make effective use of other infrastructure investments before extending utilities for redevelopment of the golf course. Downtown Focus Area herein ed aig GOHTr-eheH;9h;,e Plan. Downtown Monticello needs special attention in the Comprehensive Plan. Following the 2008 Comprehensive Plan update, the community undertook a separate downtown planning process. This process resulted in the Embracing Downtown Plan. TKao Plan oM. plxwiZ ora-munityphwe� DovArtev�%. Tne 2008 Comprehenso P.Las UpAate x1iQ3 os tho Embmsing Downtovm Plan as a mer publie and privato ootkz-.3 in the r., #- .,.In 2017, recognizing the changes in the retail marketplace, and more specifically market changes and investments in the Downtown, the City engaged the community in a planning effort for the core blocks of the Downtown. On September 25th, 2017, the City adopted a Downtown Small Area Plan, which provides guidance for the downtown, including the core blocks and extending to include the full Downtown Central Community District (CCD). The Plan emphasizes the importance that the community places on Downtown. The 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update relies on the Downtown Small Area Plan as a guide for public and private actions in the Downtown area. Revitalizing and sustaining Downtown Monticello requires a collaborative effort of the City, businesses, property owners and other stakeholders. Planning for the future of the Downtown must recognize the practical realities facing commercial development in Downtown: ➢ The configuration and traffic volumes of Highway 25 significantly reduce opportunities for direct access from the Highway to adjacent properties. ➢ Traffic volumes on Highway 25 will continue to increase. Greater volumes and congestion act as an impediment for people living south of I-94 coming to Downtown. ➢ There is no controlled intersection on Highway 25 between Broadway and 7th Street. The lack of a controlled intersection combined with traffic volumes make pedestrian connections between Downtown and residential areas to the east very difficult. ➢ "Big box" and retail development continue to occur in other parts of Monticello. These businesses directly compete with the Downtown and attract smaller businesses (that might otherwise consider a Downtown location) to adjacent parcels. Downtown Goals Given current plans and conditions, the Embracing Downtown Plan and the Comprehensive Plan recommends the following goals for Downtown. Concepts for Downtown redevelopment should provide solutions to problems and issues identified in the research and analysis of Downtown conditions that are directed by the stated goals for Land Use, Transportation and Design and Image. The preferred solutions should be those that best meet these goals. Land Use -�—Diwe4Pf-4an4—ttso in the Downtown-, supplement retail and swdoo uav-s with other- Eneour-age redevelopment of old and obsolete st,-,,..tures; eneourage eonsolidation of small p(Lroolz :with, multiple o ,-ship -)O--3OY moo parhing—and land use to omoun Guailabs.lity of adequa o parking at all times —l~',,,,,,,,,,,,,moo mixed e but do no ma2zej it—a at o o site f development er edeN-jlM,nmt-. —T iseoufago si oxda ma Too standing land -)0---&talic,h pl4ry-siea eeti between etwee the eor-e Downtown area and the rivef4oat and -)-0-->~ r,.,.,,, age land uses that se e as „cxnirrg and .kend att-r-aetions to the Downtown area.- -)0- Fyrpandf4cilities and parking adjaeent t Vk— go hark ta-hdp o:oate an ani aftf,etio,, at the ,,,,ft en „rualnut FtY� ➢ Create a Center to Downtown that is active throughout the day and into the evening — year-round. The Walnut/Broadway Intersection should become the heart of this area. ➢ Improve connections to the River by locating uses that benefit from open spaces and activities associated with the River. ➢ Improve the entry experience from the north. ➢ Maintain a shopfront District along Broadway, west of Pine Street comprised of traditional main street (mercantile) buildings that have retaillrestaurant space on the ground floor and housing or offices above. ➢ Create a development pattern on Pine Street that benefits from high visibility and regional access. ➢ Infill Walnut Street and Cedar Street with mid -scale housing (2-4 stories) that creates an effective transition between the in -town neighborhoods and the Downtown. (INSERT LAND USE FRAMEWORK MAP) Transportation in *efm^ of pfe idi xg dire . Develep eifettlation paft efts th:at utilioa looal streets for in.a;.,;.7ua site -�O—no,.,.gnizo u;,,b,v ay 25 w a barb, between the east and west pafts of the hist Fie r,,..,,PA,.VV 0 Eerier, GonsideF developing in dist-Fiets to re&ee the ova OF desire to orow Highway 25 be eefl 7thstreet and the r �_ Paas of the City to the sot*' and east, Downplay •gkway 25 as a s ffimazer pedestrian movemenA, B-e.,.7.t, the f-oPA Dark . ., to allown prr- to sego cap an o`,+..^ brings people ipAe the down4own area-. Pi:ef4e �c4. r1jo7aational opp,.. Es --)0-Exploreefeationof -a-4kirdh c�gnalized inter-seetion on Highway 25 between 7th Str-ee and Broadway Stree� to ifnpr-o3ve aeeess to areas c4-. oithar side-af d -.Q LZg ➢ Connect Walnut Street to River Street ➢ Maintain the River Street /Pine Street signal as the formal entrance to Downtown and an important pedestrian connection across Pine Street. ➢ Add a traffic signal at 4th and Pine to help balance the grid and turning movements at the Pine /Broadway Intersection. ➢ Modify Walnut/Broadway and Cedar/ Walnut Broadway intersection to prioritize pedestrian crossings and access to the river. ➢ Narrow the travel lanes on Walnut Street, add parking where possible and ensure continuous safe and pleasant sidewalks. ➢ Add sidewalks at the perimeter of blocks where they are not currently present. ➢ Discourage direct property access to Pine Street, favoring the side streets wherever possible with through -block lanes or easements. ➢ Allow direct property access to Block 52 from Pine Street in order to reduce volumes at the Pine /Broadway intersection. ➢ Consider traffic calming at River Street and Locust (or Linn) to prevent excessive speeds - similar to River Street and Cedar Street as an example. Open Space & Parks ➢ Redesign East and West Bridge park to include an amphitheater, water feature, riverfront access, picnicking, and additional space for passive park use. ➢ Improve Front Street Park to include improved boat landing and space for nature oriented programming. ➢ Connect the two Bridge Parks with Front Street Park with improved pathways and trails. Design all three parks as a single park with multiple uses. ➢ Provide access to the islands with a seasonal bridge ➢ Create small pocketparks mid -block on Broadway to offer plazas that connect to parking lots in the middle of the block ➢ Redesign Walnut Street between River Street and Broadway as a special street that can be closed and used for festivals and events throughout the year. ➢ Consider all sidewalks for opportunities to enhance greenery and public art Emphasize Walnut Street, River Street and Broadway as the main pedestrian corridors in Downtown. ➢ Use public art throughout the parks and corridors to distinguish Downtown as a place of cultural expression and celebration. ➢ Work closely with local businesses, residents (new and existing) to ensure local parks and open spaces are appropriately designed and programmed for their varied needs. ➢ Create north /south bike access to the river along Walnut and Cedar through a complete streets policy. Encourage bicycle crossing of Pine Street at 4th, River and 71h Street. ➢ Maintain sidewalks and paths along TH25. Downtown Design and Image M rA ef:ea4ing undue dAipc for property and buildrg awner-s. ledge tha4 the histerie "NUin Street" atfeet afe chi0t;zOrt ky—O S6iat"Or 1"1lanfy to11axtr, Grid ' ser—S in today's cau4o 13ivbile an i eenvenienee a,;I .r:.�1otp1aee. —The publiezealriof stfeets, bottlevards—anc sidewalks r-epreseits the best oppeftunity to er-e o an into nm image for- downtown it The Higkway 25 and Broadway eon4ders should be softened with treetseape''�andseape eatFwetoofAeth- effeets of high tFaffie olumes and to help o id'i an idefA t. for the -�--Develepment Qiat lderient—toward inter-seetion of Higkway 25 with Broadway to take advantage of tfaffie volumes in should be sealed to allow `i17�iFLt�t6 Him �. The Corrpxehenme RP weks to enhance Use exstng cnnmvwl cue aling auadmy by buift stugcmecbrnsAMftm ftra and ftdv&eWdisbictonUsemMend MatnutSUeet Thecuuetlte id ofWaklutSUeetisabanierto improving connectionsbetween Downtown and U e nvediont —e� in tllr�'l5 and Bfeadway eer-fider-s should be lee4ed to Ale aader- figM of pab6o ddewalks with eonneetions to —a eentii FauG "Do,,.vf t i+ sidewalk ede-St 3-22 1 Land Use City of Monticello d havo amt: parlarng of! publie) within easy and eofwenie walking distance. -)O-Two r,,...,..town plan zh�'�provi od pabIlic to ring people together- to of commanitr t �3 aoseeiated with ➢ The Downtown Small Area Plan provides guidance for the core blocks of the downtown. Where the Downtown SmallArea Plan does not provide specific design guidance, the City's zoning ordinance will guide design and image. South Central Focus Area Continued residential growth to the south is an important element of the Comprehensive Plan. This growth achieves several objectives: ➢ It helps to facilitate the expansion of the sanitary sewer system in conjunction with the reconstruction of Fallon Avenue. This sanitary sewer capacity is needed to support future industrial growth area along Highway 25. ➢ These areas encourage growth in areas that could use the new eastern interchange with I- 94 rather than Highway 25. ➢ These areas provide appropriate locations for continued growth in entry-level single family homes and medium density housing types. These Places to Live are important elements of maintaining an adequately diverse housing stock. ➢ Orderly expansion to the south moves development towards area of higher natural amenity. Areas along the southern edge of the Orderly Annexation Area provide another location for potential "move up" housing. A key to development in this focus area is the construction of the Fallon Avenue bridge. The bridge leads to the reconstruction of Fallon Avenue and the related expansion of municipal sanitary sewer and water systems. Future development will be limited without additional utility capacity. East Focus Area The Comprehensive Plan places greater priority on growth to the west and south. Development should be directed to areas that most effectively achieve the objectives of this Plan. Several factors could cause the City to encourage future residential development in the East Focus Area: ➢ Increased overall housing demand that exceeds the capacity to support growth in other areas. ➢ Traffic congestion on Highway 25 that increases the need to channel use to the east interchange. ➢ The need to solve stormwater and drainage management issues (Ditch 33) in this area. Solving drainage issues allows eastward expansion along County Road 18. ➢ Future growth in the east should continue to fill in the development area within the Orderly Annexation Area on the east side of Monticello. The natural features in these areas allow for higher amenity neighborhoods. This growth can occur with new collector/arterial street corridors. The chart in Figure 4-2 shows how legislative changes have reduced the tax base created by commercial - industrial development. This chart is based on the tax capacity value for $3,000,000 of Taxable Market Value. The legislative changes in the rates used to set tax capacity mean that this property produced 56% less tax base in 2012 than in 1997. This trend takes on additional meaning when compared to other classifications of property. Figure 4-3 compares the tax capacity value for the primary forms of development in Monticello. The valuations in this chart are based on assumptions about the density of development and estimated market value of new development. Changes in these assumptions will alter the results. This chart clearly illustrates the current reality for economic development strategies. All forms of development contribute tax base to the community. It is risky placing too much weight on one type of development for tax base growth. In addition, cities do not control the critical elements of the tax system. Changes in the system lead to unanticipated results at the local level. Tax base growth has implications that are unique to Monticello. The chart in Figure 4-4 shows the distribution of taxes payable in 2011. Utilities, likely largely Xcel Energy, contributes about one-third of the City's taxes, while both commercial/industrial and residential uses contribute 28% each. Enhancing Downtown Maintaining a successful Downtown is an important element of the economic development plan for Monticello. Downtown is a key business district providing goods, services, and jobs for the community. Downtown is unlike any other business district because of its unique role in Monticello's identity and heritage. The Land Use chapter describes plans, policies, and strategies related to Downtown Monticello. Downtown is part of the Economic Development chapter because of the likelihood that city actions and investments Figure 4-4: Distribution of 2011 Taxes Payable will be needed to achieve community objectives for Comore .Ord. 4,787,530 24% All Other t;YEA Downtown. This intervention may include: lY 7 ➢ Public improvements to provide services or to enhance the Downtown environment. ➢ Provision of adequate parking supply. ➢ Acquisition of land. ➢ Preparation of sites for development. ➢ Removal of other physical and economic barriers to achieve community objectives. These actions may require the use of tax increment financing, tax abatement, or other finance tools available to the City. In 2011, the City of Monticello conducted a retail market study for Downtown Monticello. The retail market study report part of a larger study, Embracing Downtown Monticello, has been ineofpofaed i the G,.aTret, assyo Plan az an append serves as a resource for economic context within the downtown. In 2017, the City of Monticello conducted an updated Retail Vitality Study, part of the Downtown Small Area Plan, that provides additional updated resource information for downtown economic context fer-- rn,n&moxtatiarref the Ge ekersva 1%.N. Mae s4* inehided eempetition Da•imt&aA a aurvoy of ,st„mef delineatien of the -trade- afea, a*d die-tstaUf-5h _-nt -ef mar-ket demand for cuo buvnssses. Some findings of the 2011 retail market study report, of the Embracing Downtown Monticello included: ➢ Downtown Monticello enjoys a strategic location between the Mississippi River and I- 94. This focuses traffic on TH-25 resulting in traffic counts higher in Downtown than south of 1-94 ➢ Due to physical barriers created by the Mississippi River and 1-94, about one-third of Downtown and secondary trade area shoppers must pass through Downtown Monticello to reach the shopping areas south of I-94. ➢ Downtown has the largest concentration of shopping goods stores and restaurants. ➢ Downtown's trade area population was estimated at 93,500 in 2010 and is projected to have an annual growth rate of 2.2%. ➢ Monticello's large anchor stores (Cub Foods, SuperTarget, Walmart, and Home Depot) create a secondary trade area. The population of the combined Downtown and secondary trade areas was 127,190 in 2010. ➢ CentraCare Health System, with 25 beds and 600 employees has established Monticello as a regional medical center. ➢ Increased residential development stimulates increased commercial development. The recent economic conditions have slowed residential development, thus resulting in reduced tenant demand for retail space. ➢ Additional retail space in Downtown Monticello can be supported by the trade area population. A range of store types can be considered including shopping goods, convenience goods, and food establishments. Downtown's existing wide variety of services limits potential future opportunities. However, market research indicates that Monticello could support additional medical practices. Figure 4-5: Embracing Downtown Monticello Primary and Secondary Trade Areas pDOMM, roaru a .. F 4 DCoMq*t X11 61 DmM Om*� Lid The future vision for Monticello provides the foundation for the Comprehensive Plan (the vision statement appears in Chapter 1). The Land Use Plan, in turn, provides the framework for how land will be used to help achieve the future vision for Monticello. The Land Use Plan seeks to reinforce desirable land use patterns, identify places where change is needed and guide the form and location of future growth. The Land Use Plan for Monticello was shaped by a variety of factors, including: ► Community input gathered through public workshops and Task Force discussions. ► The existing built and natural environment in Monticello. ► The vision for Monticello's future. ► Factors described in the Community Context chapter of the Plan. ► Systems plans for transportation, sanitary sewer and water supply. This represents a departure in form from the 1996 Comprehensive Plan. The 1996 Plan included the land use plan as part of a broader Development Framework section. The 1996 Plan described Monticello's land use plan by general district of the community as a means of attending to the unique issues in each district. The 2008 Update of the Comprehensive Plan establishes a separate land use chapter consisting of the following components: ► A section on Future Growth describes the implications of future resident growth and the amount of growth anticipated by the Plan. ► The Land Use Plan Mau (see Figure 3-2) shows the land uses assigned to each parcel of land. ► Land Use Categories further explain the Land Use Plan by describing the land uses depicted in the Map. This section includes land use policies describe the objectives that Monticello seeks to achieve through the implementation of the Land Use Plan and the supporting elements of the Comprehensive Plan. ► Focus Areas provide a more detailed discussion of characteristics, goals and policies for key areas of the community. 2008 Comprehensive Plan Land Use 1 3-1 Future Growth In looking to the future, Monticello must not just consider the qualities of the future community, but also the nature of growth. Assumptions about the amount and pace of future growth are important parts of the foundation for the Comprehensive Plan. Growth has several important implications for the Comprehensive Plan: ► Growth projections are used to plan for the capacity of municipal utility systems. ► Growth projections are used to create and manage finance plans for capital improvements. ► The school system uses growth projections to forecast enrollments and to plan for programs and facilities. ► Market studies use growth projections to analyze the potential for locating or expanding businesses in Monticello. ► The characteristics of growth influence the amount of land needed to support this development. ► Growth adds trips to the local street system. ► Assumptions about growth influence the policies and actions needed to implement the Comprehensive Plan. For these reasons, it is essential that the Comprehensive Plan state assumptions of the nature of future growth. A challenge in forecasting future residential development is that the Comprehensive Plan influences, but does not control, the factors that determine where people live. These factors include: ► Quality of life. ► Access to employment. ► Availability of desired housing and neighborhood options. ► Affordability. ► Competition from other places in the region. Given these uncertainties, the Comprehensive Plan seeks a balance between optimism and prudence. For many reasons, the Plan should not significantly understate the growth potential of Monticello. The balancing force lies with the implications of assuming Figure 3-1: Growth Trends and Projections 300 256 250 2az 223 22 208 200 - 67 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 +Actual 150 - 130 t projected 110 100 - 90 77 70 +\ 50 50 \- 30" 0 000 ti1 00'L 000 00$ 0,�0 01'1, Oyb 010 0.�0 0.1,0 ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti more growth than is reasonable. The chart in Figure 3-1 shows the projection of future residential growth assumed in the Comprehensive Plan. The projections assumes that the rate of growth slowly rises over the next five years and continues at a level of 150 units per year from 2012 to 2020. This amount falls below the 229 units/year average for 2001 through 2005. This rate of growth is intended to reflect several factors. Monticello will remain a desirable place to live, attracting both builders and residents. Housing market conditions will improve from the weaknesses experienced in 2006 and 2007. A combination of market conditions, local policy objectives, and changing demographics may reduce the potential for achieving and sustaining higher rates of residential growth. Slower future growth reflects the belief that achieving the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan, in particular seeking more move up housing, will result in less development than in previous years. Growth Policies 1. The City will consistently review recent development trends and update growth projections to serve as a basis for public and private planning. 2. Over the life of this Comprehensive Plan, growth will occur within the boundaries of the current municipal boundaries and the Orderly Annexation Area. 3. Future development should be guided to locations that utilize existing infrastructure and locations 3-2 1 Land Use City of Monticello that facilitate the construction of street and utility systems that meet the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. 4. The Comprehensive Plan does not anticipate action by Monticello to annex or extend utility systems to property immediately north of the Mississippi River. Development in this area will place additional traffic on STH 25 (particularly in the Downtown area) and channel investment away from other parts of the City, especially the Downtown. Land Use Plan Map The Land Use Plan Map (shown in Figure 3-2) shows the desired land use for all property in Monticello and the Orderly Annexation Area The land use plan depicted in this map builds on the previous community planning in Monticello. The Comprehensive Plan uses the Land Use Plan to define the broad land use patterns in Monticello. The Land Use Plan seeks to: an effective land use management tool requires a definition of each land use. These definitions provide a common understanding of the basic characteristics of each category used in the Land Use Plan. The 1996 Plan relies on three basic categories of private land use: residential, commercial and industrial. Each of these categories is further divided into subcategories that distinguish between the character, type and intensity of development desired in different locations. The 2008 update of the Comprehensive Plan uses a different approach to achieve similar land use patterns. The Land Use Plan map depicts series of "places" for private development: Places to Live, Places to Shop, Places to Work, and Downtown. This approach is based on the following rationale: ► These broad categories more clearly illustrate the pattern of development and the plan for future growth. ► Although residential land uses vary by type and density, they share many public objectives. ► Organize the community in a sustainable ► This approach makes a more enduring manner. ► Make efficient use of municipal utility systems and facilitate the orderly and financially feasible expansion of these systems. ► Provide the capacity for the type of growth desired by the community. The Land Use Plan Map is only one piece of the land use plan for Monticello. The other parts of the Land Use chapter of the Comprehensive Plan work with this map to explain the intent and objectives for future land use. Further, this map lays the foundation for land use controls that are used by the City to implement the Comprehensive Plan. Land Use Categories The Land Use Plan Map uses a set of specific categories to guide land use in Monticello. One element missing from the 1996 Comprehensive Plan was a description of the land use categories shown in the Land Use Plan. The ability to use the Comprehensive Plan as comprehensive plan. The Plan can guide an area for the appropriate land use without the need to predict future community needs and market forces. ► The Plan relies on policies, land use regulations, performance standards and public actions to provide a more detailed guide for land use and development. This approach conveys more flexibility and control to the City Council and the Planning Commission. Role of Zoning Regulations Zoning regulations play a critical role in implementing land use plans in Monticello. State Law gives zoning regulations priority overthe Comprehensive Plan. If land uses are different, zoning regulations control the use of land. Zoning regulations are particularly important in the application of the land use categories in the Monticello Comprehensive Plan. The "places to" land use categories set forth a broad and flexible land use pattern for Monticello. Zoning regulations (and other land use controls) will be used to determine the appropriate location for each form of development and other regulations on the use of land, consistent with policies of the Comprehensive Plan. 2008 Comprehensive Plan — Updated 2014 Land Use 1 3-3 Figure 3-2: Land Use Pian Map b 7 '•+ _ 1 Z` rP O d N o U C. to K U m rn o @? C7 c v r Q m o 0 0 0 0 w o � t 0 Lm` � � 5 � T � y; f - ,••'~ 3,. -_-�"- G � � v v v v 3d o m m m H � P? � � � o. 3 �' d 1 •+ ' � 1 I `: , k. c a a a a a o _8 _ a' 3 a a i w a` a 20 0 ry, CO 8 1 N a �_ _ Vis...- - �� • , ..-v m 6 •� I! I � J a. �_ J cn I'... . v � o Q �FE V ° --- Us % m C E 3-4 Land Use City of Monticello Figure 3-3: Land Use Plan - Places to Live o 025 ns 1 Grt�-rpt •mG(+U.WYr�r[i�tX4� r a,auti.uraau �rA AMbt The remainder of this section describes the categories used in the Comprehensive Plan in greater detail. Places to Live The Comprehensive Plan seeks to create and sustain quality places for people to live in Monticello (see Figure 3-3). This category designates areas where housing is the primary use of land. The emphasis behind Places to Live is to help ensure that Monticello offers a full range of housing choices, while preserving and enhancing the quality of neighborhoods. Although a single land use category, Places to Live does not suggest housing is a homogenous commodity or that any type of housing is desirable or allowed in any location. L -- When someone says "house" the most common image is a single family detached dwelling. This housing style is characterized by several features. There is a one-to- one relationship between house and parcel of land - the housing unit is located on a single parcel. The house is not physically attached to another housing unit. The housing is designed for occupancy by a single family unit. The typical neighborhood in Monticello is made up exclusively of single family detached homes. The primary variables become the design of the subdivision, the size of the lot and the size and style of the dwelling. Many older neighborhoods in Monticello (north of Interstate 94) were built on a traditional grid street system. Over the past thirty years, development patterns have moved to a new suburban curvilinear 2008 Comprehensive Plan - Updated 2014 Land Use 1 3-5 pattern, characterized by curvilinear street layout with the use of cul-de-sacs. A variety of factors, including consumer preference and housing cost, have increased the construction of attached housing in recent years. Duplexes, twin homes, quads and townhomes are common examples of this housing style. Although the specific form changes, there are several common characteristics. Each housing unit is designed for occupancy by a single family. The housing units are physically attached to each other in a horizontal orientation. Places to Live will include some neighborhoods designed to offer a mixture of housing types and densities. Mixed residential neighborhoods create a pattern that combines single-family detached housing with a mixture of attached housing types. Using good design and planning, these mixed residential neighborhoods can achieve a higher density without compromising the overall integrity of the low-density residential pattern. This integration strengthens neighborhoods by increasing housing choice and affordability beyond what is possible by today's rules and regulations. It also avoids large and separate concentrations of attached housing. It enhances opportunities to organize development in a manner that preserves natural features. A complete housing stock includes higher density residential areas that consist of multi -family housing types such as apartments and condominiums. In the near term, the Comprehensive Plan does not anticipate expanding the existing supply of higher density housing. It is likely that Monticello will need additional higher density housing to: ► Provide housing suited to the needs of an aging population. ► Facilitate redevelopment in the Downtown or in other appropriate locations of the community. ► Provide housing needed to attract the work force required to achieve economic development goals of the City. Higher density residential land uses should be located and designed to be compatible with nearby residential or mixed uses, on lots able to accommodate larger buildings and added traffic generation. In addition, siting factors for high density residential uses will prioritize access to services and amenities including public utilities, parks, trails and open space, and commercial and/or medical services. It will be important, when considering potential designation of high density housing development, that the parcels meet the specific standards of the zoning district, and such development can be accommodated in accordance with the policies in this Plan. While these comments and the comments in the zoning ordinance are intended to be instructive they are not necessarily the only factors that might come into play on specific properties. Policies - Places to Live The Comprehensive Plan seeks to achieve the following objectives for residential land use in Monticello: 1. Provide a range of housing choices that fit all stages of a person's life -cycle (see below). 2. Support development in areas that best matches the overall objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. 3. Develop quality neighborhoods that create a sense of connection to the community and inspire sustained investment. The Comprehensive Plan seeks to maintain the quality and integrity of existing neighborhoods by encouraging the maintenance of property and reinvestment into the existing housing stock. Changes in housing type should be allowed only to facilitate necessary redevelopment. 4. Create neighborhoods that allow residents to maintain a connection to the natural environment and open spaces. 5. Seek quality over quantity in residential growth. Achieving the objectives for quality housing and neighborhoods may reduce the overall rate of growth. 6. Reserve areas with high amenities for "move up" housing as desired in the vision statement. These amenities may include forested areas, wetland complexes, adjacency to parks and greenways. Some of the City's policy objectives require further explanation. 3-6 1 Land Use City of Monticello Figure 3-4: Life Cycle of Housing Supply u l lul III IL-1 U, MIK I ■ L Life Cycle Housing Housing is not a simple "one size fits all" commodity. Monticello's housing stock varies by type, age, style and price. The Community Context chapter of the Comprehensive Plan describes the characteristics of the housing stock based on the 2000 Census and recent building permit trends. The concept of life cycle housing recognizes that housing needs change over the course of a person's life (see Figure 3-4). Young adults may not have the income capacity to own the typical single family home. This segment of the population often seeks rental housing. Families move through different sizes, styles and prices of housing as family size and income changes over time. With aging, people may desire smaller homes with less maintenance. Eventually, the elderly transition to housing associated with options for direct care. As noted in the Vision Statement, Monticello's population will continue to become more diverse. This diversity will be seen in age, race, culture and wealth. These factors will influence the housing needs of Monticello. The Comprehensive Plan recognizes these differences and seeks to create a balanced housing supply that encourages people to move to and stay in Monticello. This balance may not be achieved solely by market forces guided by this Land Use Plan. Actions by the City may be needed to promote the creation of housing in underserved segments of the market. Neighborhood Design A priority for the community is diversification of the housing stock by providing more "move up" housing. In this context, the term "move up" housing refers to larger homes with more amenities in structure and setting. This type of housing may not be exclusively single-family detached or low density. Attached forms of housing with medium or high densities may meet the objectives for move up housing in the appropriate locations. In this way, the objectives for move up housing and life cycle housing are compatible and supportive. While every community wants a high quality housing stock, this issue has particular importance in Monticello. It is a key to retaining population. Without a broader 2008 Comprehensive Plan - Updated 2014 Land Use 1 3-7 variety of housing options, families may encouraged to leave Monticello to meet their need for a larger home. It is a factor in economic development. One facet of attracting and retaining professional jobs is to provide desirable housing alternatives. It must be recognized that creating move up housing requires more than policies in the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan provides a guide for achieving the desired results. The desired outcomes require private investment. This investment occurs when demand exists or the City can provide an incentive to attract investment. Part of attracting move up housing comes from creating great neighborhoods — places that will attract and sustain the housing options sought by the City. Neighborhoods are the building block of Places to Live in Monticello. The goal of the Comprehensive Plan is to create and maintain attractive, safe and functional neighborhoods. The following policies help to achieve this objective: Neighborhoods should incorporate the natural characteristics of the setting. Trees, terrain, drainageways, and other natural features provide character to neighborhoods. 2. Housing should be oriented to the local street, minimizing access and noise conflicts with collector streets. 3. The City will use public improvements to enhance the appearance and character of a neighborhood. Some examples of improvements that define an area include streets with curb and gutter, trees in the public boulevard, street lighting systems, and storm water ponding. 4. Sidewalks, trails, and bikeways will connect the neighborhood to other parts of the community. 5. Every neighborhood should have reasonable access to a public park as a place for residents to gather and play. All of these elements work together to create a desirable and sustainable place to live. Figure 3-5: Relationship Between Development and Natural Features - Parkway Figure 3-6: Relationship Between Development and Natural Features - Trail Corridor 9 T7 7i- I I -F Balancing the Built and Natural Environments The natural amenities of the growth areas (west and south) in Monticello should serve as a catalyst for residential development. The Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park offers the dual assets of natural features and recreational opportunities. Lakes, wetlands and other natural amenities exist throughout the orderly annexation area. Studies have shown that parks and open space have a positive economic effect on adjacent development. An article published by the National Park and Recreation Association states that "recent analyses suggest that open spaces may have substantial positive impacts on surrounding property values and hence, the 3-8 1 Land Use City of Monticello Figure 3-7. Example of Conservation Design Development • OPEN SPACE DESIGN Pastures Equestrian Facility }- Wetlands Enhancements ~ - Conservation Easements yt - Central Park w -- - 27 Acre Park South of Lake 4 NEIGHBORHOOD FEATURES ' + - Central Park Northeast Neighborhood Green South Neighborhood Green Association Dock and Park ru property tax base, providing open space advocates with convincing arguments in favor of open space designation and preservation." Balancing the built and natural environments should provide a catalyst to the types of development desired by the City and in the expansion of the property tax base. In attempting to meet residential development objectives, the City should not lose sight of long-term public benefit from access to these same natural areas. The original development of Monticello provides an excellent illustration. The majority of the riverfront in Monticello is controlled by private property. Public access to the River comes at points provided by public parks. A well known example of balancing public use with private development is the Minneapolis chain of lakes and Minnehaha Creek. Public streets (parkways) and trails separate neighborhoods from the natural NORTHWEST NEIGHBORHOOI ' 4? Total Housing Units: 98 Semi -Custom, Single -Family Homes Lot Width: 82' Minimum Lot Size: 9,900 to 16,000 Sq. Ft. t 7 dL House Sq. Ft: 2,400 to 4,800 Sq. Ft. Price Point Packages: $450,000 to $650,000 3 %fNORTHEAST NEIGHBORHOOD Total Housing Units: 66 Custom, Luxury Twin Homes i Lot Width: 45'x 90' Twinhome 311114. Lot Size: 4,050 Sq. Ft. House Sq. Ff.: 2,800 to 3,800 Sq. Ft. Price Poinf Packages: $475,00010 _w$750,000 godT r �J features, preserving public use and access. These neighborhoods are some of the most desirable in the region, demonstrating that public use and private benefit are not mutually exclusive. The figures on the previous page show two options for integrating housing, natural features and public use. Figure 3-5 is the parkway concept. An attractive street forms the edge between the park (or natural area) and the housing. A multi -use trail follows the street while homes face the street and draw on the attractiveness of both the parkway and the natural amenities. The alternative is to use a trail corridor to provide public access to these areas (see Figure 3-6). The trail follows the edge of the natural area. Access to the trail between lots should come at reasonable intervals. There are a variety of real world examples of how Minnesota cities have used conservation design strategies to promote high quality development and 2008 Comprehensive Plan — Updated 2014 Land Use 1 3-9 preserve the natural environment. The illustrations in Figure 3-7 shows elements of the Chevalle development in Chaska. Using open space design and rural residential cluster development techniques, HKGi's concept plan provides for a variety of housing options while preserving a majority of the area as permanent owner. This relationship may include a third party property manager retained by the owner to perform maintenance duties. Owners of attached housing may act collectively through a homeowner's association. In multiple family rental housing, the tenants have no direct responsibility for property maintenance. This open space, including public and common open discussion does not imply a preference, but is intended spaces. Amenities would include access to protected solely to highlight the differences. This understanding open spaces (lakeshore, woods, meadows, pastures, wetlands), walking/biking trails, equestrian trails and facilities, common outdoor structures and an environmental learning center. The experience of other cities and developments can guide future planning and decision making in Monticello. Attractive Places Attractive physical appearance is one of the most common attributes of Places to Live in Monticello. Attractiveness is a combination of design, construction and maintenance. These characteristics apply to buildings and sites. Attractiveness is relevant for both private and public property. Attractiveness reflects individual pride in property as well as an overall sense of community quality. The City may use a variety of regulatory tools to influence the potential for attractive neighborhoods: ► Building codes and additional regulations to promote quality construction. ► Subdivision regulations control the initial configuration of lots. ► Zoning regulations establish limitations on the size of lots, placement of the house on a lot, relationship of structure size to lot area, and building height. ► Nuisance ordinances enable the City to prevent and correct undesirable uses of property. ► Other City regulations control other ancillary uses of residential property. Maintenance of property is a factor in sustaining quality neighborhoods. The tenure (form of ownership) influences the responsibility for housing maintenance. The owner -occupant of a single family detached home is solely responsible for the maintenance of building and grounds. If this same home is rented, maintenance responsibilities are often shared between tenant and becomes relevant when public action is needed to address a failure of the private maintenance approach. Nuisance ordinances are one tool used by the City to address failures in private maintenance and use of property. Economics also influences property maintenance. The greater the portion of income devoted to basic housing costs (mortgage/rent, taxes, utilities), the less money available for maintenance activities. Maintenance can be deferred, but not avoided. If left unchecked, this cycle of avoided maintenance produces negative effects. Safe Places Safety is frequently identified as the most desired characteristic of Places to Live. Several aspects of the Comprehensive Plan and city government influence safe neighborhoods. 1. The City will encourage existing neighborhoods and develop new neighborhoods where people are involved in the community, interact with their neighbors and support each other. 2. The City will design, build and maintain a system of streets that collects traffic from neighborhoods, allows movement within Monticello to jobs, shopping and other destinations and minimizes traffic that "cuts through" neighborhoods on local streets seeking other destinations. 3. The City will provide, directly or by contract, services needed to protect people and property. 4. The City will support the Land Use Plan with a water supply that provides clean water at pressures needed to support fire suppression. 5. The City will protect the natural environment by requiring new development to connect to the sanitary sewer system and by adequately treating all municipal wastewater. 3-10 1 Land Use City of Monticello Figure 3-8: Land Use Plan - Places to Work ' S ti 1 ion INk k* ■ f Wad Ld4 �• RorFfMvl � �� ■ T � 6. The City will provide water that is safe to drink by protecting water supply sources. Places to Work This land use is primarily intended for industrial development. Places to Work seeks to provide locations for the retention, expansion and creation of businesses that provide jobs for Monticello residents and expansion and diversification of the property tax base. In order to be a center of employment with a wide range of job opportunities, it is critical that Monticello preserve sufficient land for Places to Work over the next twenty-five years. These land uses can be one of the most challenging to locate because of its need for r x'' H d 11� I ti I 1 +4 _} -Z •�.■■�.s■.■s r + r-1 76 am. convenient transportation access and influence on surrounding land uses. In planning for future Places to Work, the Comprehensive Plan considers the goals of the community; what type of industrial development is sought; and what factors should be considered when locating an industrial land use. In planning for sustaining existing businesses and attracting new development, it is necessary to understand why Places to Work are important to Monticello. The objectives for this land use include: ► Expanding and diversifying the property tax base. ► Providing jobs with an increasing opportunity for people to work and live in Monticello. 2008 Comprehensive Plan — Updated 2014 Land Use 1 3-11 II .e 0 0.25 05 1 ,Miles w��Y. Data Source M DNR, Shob— Coenty, Wright C ... tv. end WSB & A--N—bu 1, 2011 i ��Y+l•� 6. The City will provide water that is safe to drink by protecting water supply sources. Places to Work This land use is primarily intended for industrial development. Places to Work seeks to provide locations for the retention, expansion and creation of businesses that provide jobs for Monticello residents and expansion and diversification of the property tax base. In order to be a center of employment with a wide range of job opportunities, it is critical that Monticello preserve sufficient land for Places to Work over the next twenty-five years. These land uses can be one of the most challenging to locate because of its need for r x'' H d 11� I ti I 1 +4 _} -Z •�.■■�.s■.■s r + r-1 76 am. convenient transportation access and influence on surrounding land uses. In planning for future Places to Work, the Comprehensive Plan considers the goals of the community; what type of industrial development is sought; and what factors should be considered when locating an industrial land use. In planning for sustaining existing businesses and attracting new development, it is necessary to understand why Places to Work are important to Monticello. The objectives for this land use include: ► Expanding and diversifying the property tax base. ► Providing jobs with an increasing opportunity for people to work and live in Monticello. 2008 Comprehensive Plan — Updated 2014 Land Use 1 3-11 Figure 3-9: Land Use Plan - Places to Shop f VY — w+0 0.25 o.s � �#�� e _� Miles X44.■ •* rr** Data Source: MnDNft, Sherburne Coa„ ty, Wright �h i � SL-111 � i �r +I I I f I'—_ Coonty,.d WS6&Assoolatee. N—ber1,2011 131 i 15 .y` - -' ► Promoting wage levels that provide incomes needed to purchase decent housing, support local businesses and support local government services. ► Take advantage of opportunities to attract companies that have a synergy with existing companies in the community, including suppliers, customers and collaborative partners. ► Encouraging the retention and expansion of existing businesses in Monticello. Policies - Places to Work 1. The City will use the Comprehensive Plan to designate and preserve a supply of land for Places to Work that meets current and future needs. 2. Consistent with the vision for the future of Monticello, the Land Use Plan promotes the 3 4. establishment of business campus settings that provide a high level of amenities, including architectural controls, landscaping, preservation of natural features, storage enclosed within buildings, and other features. The zoning ordinance, subdivision regulations and other land use controls will also be used to create and maintain the desired business campus settings. Places to Work supports the City's desire to attract businesses that complement existing businesses or benefit from the community's infrastructure, including power and telecommunications. The Comprehensive Plan also recognizes that Places to Work should provide locations for other general industrial development in the areas 3-12 1 Land Use City of Monticello of manufacturing, processing, warehousing, distribution and related businesses. S. Places to Work may include non -industrial businesses that provide necessary support to the underlying development objectives of this land use. Examples of supporting land uses include lodging, office supplies and repair services. Additional public objectives and strategies for Places to Work can be found in the Economic Development chapter. Places to Shop Places to Shop designate locations that are or can be developed with businesses involved with the sale of goods and services. Places to Shop may include offices for service businesses. Places to Shop guides land uses that are both local and regional in nature. Policies - Places to Shop The Comprehensive Plan describes issues, plans and policies related to the Downtown in several sections of the Plan. between the commercial parcel and adjacent residential uses. These policies help to create sustainable locations for Places to Shop in a manner that enhances Monticello. In guiding land uses for Places to Shop, the Downtown Comprehensive Plan seeks to: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Q The Comprehensive Plan seeks to attract and retain businesses that provide goods and services needed by Monticello residents. The Comprehensive Plan seeks to capture the opportunity for commercial development that serves a broader region. Places to Shop with a regional orientation should be located where the traffic does not disadvantage travel within Monticello. Commercial development will be used to expand and diversify the local property tax base and as an element of a diverse supply of local jobs. Places to Shop will be located on property with access to the street capacity needed to support traffic from these businesses. Each parcel should supply an adequate supply of parking that makes it convenient to obtain the goods and services. Building materials, facades and signage should combine with public improvements to create an attractive setting. 7. Site design must give consideration to defining edges and providing buffering or separation The Embracing Downtown Plan was adopted by City Council resolution 2012-011 on January 9, 2012 and is herein incorporated as an appendix of the Comprehensive Plan. Downtown is a unique commercial district that is part of Monticello's heritage and identity. It is, however, no longer possible for Downtown to be Monticello's central business district. The mass of current and future commercial development south of Interstate 94 along TH 25 and in east Monticello along interstate 94 have replaced the downtown area as primary shopping districts. The future success of downtown requires it to be a place unlike any other in Monticello. The Comprehensive Plan seeks to achieve the Vision, Guiding Principles and Goals described in the Embracing Downtown Plan. Downtown is intended to be a mix of inter -related and mutually supportive land uses. Businesses involved with the sale of goods and services should be the focus of Downtown land use. Residential development facilitates reinvestment and places potential customers in the Downtown area. Civic uses draw in people from across the community. 2008 Comprehensive Plan — Updated 2014 Land Use 1 3-13 During the planning process, the potential for allowing commercial activity to extend easterly out of the Downtown along Broadway was discussed. The Comprehensive Plan consciously defines Cedar Street as the eastern edge of Downtown for two basic reasons: (1) Downtown should be successful and sustainable before new areas of competition are created; and (2) The Comprehensive Plan seeks to maintain and enhance the integrity of residential neighborhoods east of Downtown. More than any other land use category, Downtown has strong connections to other parts of the Comprehensive Plan. Therefore the City has adopted the Embracing Downtown Plan as its guiding planning document for the Downtown. The following parts of the Comprehensive Plan also address community desires and plans for the Downtown area: ► The Land Use chapter contains a specific focus area on Downtown. The focus area contains a more detailed discussion of the issues facing the Downtown and potential public actions needed to address these issues. ► The operation of the street system is a critical factor for the future of Downtown. The Transportation chapter of the Comprehensive Plan and the Transportation chapter of the Embracing Downtown Plan influence the ability of residents to travel to Downtown and the options for mitigating the impacts of traffic on Highway 25 and other Downtown streets. ► The Parks chapter of the Comprehensive Plan provides for parks in the Downtown and the trail systems that allow people to reach Downtown on foot or bicycle. ► The Economic Development chapter of the Comprehensive Plan and the Financial Implementation chapter of the Embracing Downtown Plan lay the foundation for public actions and investments that will be needed to achieve the desired outcomes. Policies/Guiding Principles — Downtown Downtown is a special and unique part of Monticello. It merits particular attention in the Comprehensive Plan and in future efforts to achieve community plans and objectives. 2. Downtown is intended to be an inter -connected and supportive collection of land uses. The primary function of Downtown is as a commercial district. Other land uses should support and enhance the overall objectives for Downtown. 3. The City will build on core assets of greater Downtown Monticello as identified in the Embracing Downtown Plan. 4. A shared vision among property owners, business owners and the City is the foundation for effective team work and long term success. 5. A shared understanding of realistic market potential is the foundation for design and generation of a healthy business mix. 6. A safe, attractive human scale environment and entrepreneurial businesses that actively emphasize personal customer service will differentiate Downtown from other shopping districts. 7. Property values can be enhanced if property owners and the City share a vision for Downtown and actively seek to cultivate a safe, appealing environment and attractive business mix. 8. Housing in the Downtown can facilitate necessary redevelopment and bring potential customers directly into the area. Housing may be free- standing or in shared buildings with street level commercial uses. 9. Downtown is the civic center of Monticello. To the degree possible, unique public facilities (such as the Community Center, the Library and the Post Office) should be located in the Downtown area as a means to bring people into the Downtown. 10. Downtown should emphasize connections with the Mississippi River that are accessible by the public. 11. Downtown should be a pedestrian -oriented place in a manner that cannot be matched by other commercial districts. 12. Downtown should have an adequate supply of free parking for customers distributed throughout the area. 13. The City and business community must work actively with MnDOT to ensure safe local access to business districts. 3-14 1 Land Use City of Monticello All of these policies work together to attract people to Downtown and to enhance the potential for a successful business environment. Amendment to Comprehensive Plan/1997 Downtown Revitalization Plan Resolution 2010-049, adopted 7/12/10: At the intersection of Broadway and Pine Streets, parking lots may be constructed only when all of the following conditions exist: Applicable traffic safety and access requirements limit the ability to comply with building location standards of this Plan. At least fifty (50) percent of either the Broadway or Pine Street frontage is occupied by a building (non -parking area). An alternative vertical element is located at the street corner. This element must be determined by City Officials to establish an architecturally compatible corner presence. Such elements may include, but not be limited to public art, interpretive signage, architectural business signs, and architecturally appropriate lighting. Mixed Use The Mixed Use is a transition area between the Downtown and the hospital campus. It has been created in recognition of the unique nature of this area. The area serves two functions. It is the edge between long-term residential neighborhoods and a major transportation corridor (Broadway Street). It is also a link between the Downtown, the hospital campus and the east interchange retail area. The primary goal of this land use is to preserve and enhance housing in this part of Monticello. Any non-residential development should be designed to minimize the impacts on and conflicts with adjacent neighborhoods. Policies - Mixed Use Development should not have direct access to Broadway street. Access should come from side street. 2. Non-residential development should be limited to small retail, service and office businesses. The scale, character and site design should be compatible with the adjacent residential neighborhoods. 3. All non-residential development will be oriented to Broadway Street and not to 3rd Street or River Street. 4. Commercial development compatible with the Downtown should be encouraged to locate there. 5. More intense housing and commercial uses maybe allowed if directly related to the hospital. Places to Recreate Places to Recreate consist of public parks and private recreation facilities. The land uses are essential elements of the quality of life in Monticello. The Parks and Trails chapter of the Comprehensive Plan describes the current park and trail system and the future plan to maintain and enhance this system. The Comprehensive Plan is only one aspect of managing the land use for public parks and private recreation facilities. The City's zoning regulations place these locations into a zoning district. Often, the purpose of the zoning district is to guide private development, such as housing. Under current State Law, zoning regulations "trump" the Land Use Plan and govern the use of land. With the potential for the redevelopment of golf courses, it is important the Comprehensive Plan and other land use controls work in concert to achieve the desired outcomes. The City's plans and policies for parks, trails and open space can be found in the Parks chapter of the Comprehensive Plan Places for Community Places for Community consist of public and semi- public land uses. Public uses include all governmental facilities (city, county, state and federal) and schools. This category also applies to churches, cemeteries, hospitals, and other institutional uses. It is important to note that these land uses relate only to existing land uses. The Comprehensive Plan does not guide the location of new churches, schools, public buildings and other institutional land uses. Places for 2008 Comprehensive Plan — Updated 2014 Land Use 1 3-15 Community will be needed in the Northwest area as the locations in the Urban Reserve best suited for it develops. development. These uses are typically allowed in residential areas and governed by zoning regulations. These institutional uses (such as schools and churches) are important parts of the fabric of the community, but require guidance to ensure a proper fit with its residential surroundings. New institutional use should be allowed in residential areas under certain conditions. These conditions should address the aspects of the use that conflict with desired characteristics of residential neighborhood. Criteria for locating an institutional use in a residential land use area include: 1. Size. Large buildings and site areas can disrupt neighborhood cohesiveness. Use in lower density residential areas should not be more than [to be determined] square feet in lot area. 2. Parking. Parking may spill on to neighborhood streets without adequate on-site facilities. The parking needs will vary with the use of the facility. Each facility should provide adequate on-site or reasonable off-site shared parking based on the use of the facility. 3. Traffic. Institutional uses should be oriented to designated collector or arterial streets. 4. Lighting and signage. Site lighting and signage needs may resemble commercial uses. These site factors should be managed to fit the character of the surrounding residential development. Urban Reserve The Urban Reserve contains all property in the Orderly Annexation Area that it not shown for development in the near term in this Plan. The objective is to encourage rural and agricultural uses, preventing barriers to future development opportunities. It is anticipated that the City will grow into portions of the Urban Reserve as planned land use areas become fully developed and capacity for future growth in needed. The Urban Reserve is not simply a holding area for future development. Parts of the Urban Reserve are likely to be preserved as natural resource areas or for agricultural purposes. Future planning will consider Interchange Planning Area The Interchange Planning Area encompasses undeveloped land in the northwest part of Monticello around the site of a potential west interchange with Interstate 94. The purpose of this land use is to preserve the area for future development and prevent the creation of development barriers. If built, the area should be planned to support a mixture of commercial, employment and residential land uses. The interchange location and the routes of future connecting roads are solely for illustration. Future land use issues in this area are discussed in the Focus Area for Northwest Monticello. Private Infrastructure This category applies to Xcel Energy's power plant and railroad right-of-way. This category recognizes the unique role of the power plant in Monticello. Greenway The Land Use Plan Map shows a "potential greenway" ringing the western and southern edges of Monticello. The Greenway is intended to provide an environmental corridor that connects large community parks and open spaces to neighborhoods, schools, shopping areas and places to work. They serve to protect environmentally sensitive areas such as natural habitat, wetlands, tree canopy, and drainage ways. Land within this corridor could be comprised of a combination of public and private open space. Development would not be prohibited within the greenway but would be reasonably restricted to ensure that development is carefully integrated with the natural environment. The Greenway is intended to shape development patterns in a manner that is sensitive to the existing environment and harmonious with the landscape. The Greenway creates opportunities for a continuous trail corridor connecting neighborhoods with large parks and open spaces. A trail within this corridor is intended to be fully accessible to the general public. 3-16 1 Land Use City of Monticello The following are the City's goals for the Greenway: 1. To provide (where possible) a continuous green corridor connecting large community parks and open spaces to neighborhoods, shopping areas, schools and places to work. 2. To connect people to significant places. 3. To protect the community's natural resources (trees, ponds, wetlands, slopes, etc). 4. To create environmentally sensitive development and design. 5. To provide opportunities for corridors for wildlife movement and ecological connections between natural areas. Focus Areas For certain parts of Monticello, the intentions of the Comprehensive Plan cannot be adequately described solely with the land use map and the related category descriptions. The following Focus Areas provide a more detailed examination of the plans and issues in key locations that will shape the future of Monticello. Northwest Monticello This focus area includes the entire northwest corner of the community. The land use objectives in this area include: 1. Encourage development in this part of the community to utilize infrastructure investments and to provide the capacity to develop in high amenity areas. 2. Provide for a variety of housing alternatives based on the natural features and the surrounding land uses. Areas with high natural amenities or proximity to the Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park should be reserved for move up housing. 3. Expansion of existing Places to Work in a manner that creates more "head of household" jobs. 4. Preserve and promote public use of natural areas, including the establishment of greenway corridors. 5. Identify and preserve key street corridors. Figure 3-10: Land Use Plan -Northwest Monticello 6. Preserve areas for future Places to Shop and Places to Work around a future highway interchange, if such an interchange proves viable. The Comprehensive Plan envisions that growth will extend westward from existing development. The initial high amenity residential development is expected to occur along the eastern perimeter of the Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park. No Places to Live are planned with the boundaries of this park. Future development will be influenced by the capacity of the street system, including plans for the construction of a highway interchange. The remainder of this section describes the land use issues and objectives for northwest Monticello in greater detail. West Interchange A new interchange with Interstate 94 is a critical variable in the future development of this area. While the Comprehensive Plan recognizes the potential for a future interchange, in 2008 it is only a concept. It 2008 Comprehensive Plan — Updated 2014 Land Use 1 3-17 is not part of the State's plans for future highway improvements for this district. This interchange could be a valuable part of the long- term transportation plan for Monticello if it is part of a new river crossing that removes traffic from Highway 25. Without the bridge, the primary benefit is to provide access to this area and expand the development opportunities. The Land Use Plan assumes that the interchange is a future possibility. For this reason, property adjacent to the interstate has been placed into a combination of Places to Live, Work and Shop. The Plan seeks to prevent development from limiting the location of the interchange (or block it) and to preserve the area around the interchange for future commercial, industrial and residential development. Without the access provided by the interchange, commercial, industrial and residential development should not be anticipated in this area. Ideally, the City will pursue additional investigations following the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan. These investigations should be designed to resolve some of the unanswered questions related to the interchange. These questions include: ► Where should the interchange be located? ► What is the potential for a new river bridge connection? ► How would the interchange be funded and what are the financial and land use implications for the City? ► What time frame should be used in planning for the improvements? The answers to these questions provide invaluable guidance to future land use and transportation in Monticello. The area included in future planning should not be limited to the property in the Interchange Planning Area land use category. An interchange and the supporting street system has future land use implications for a broader area. Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park Another critical factor in the future of the Northwest Area is the former YMCA camp that is being converted into the Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park. The City and Wright County formed a partnership in 2005 to start purchasing portions of the 1,200 acre YMCA property. As of 2013, 495 acres have been purchased through state grants with another 300 planned for acquisition. The YMCA will lease land at the regional park to run their Camp Manitou Summer Camp. The area around this park is guided for future Places to Live. No residential development should be allowed within the park. The amenity of this land and the regional park provide an excellent setting (around the perimeter of the park) for some of the "upscale" neighborhoods and housing desired by the City. In planning for this park, it is important to look beyond the boundaries of the park and to its context in the broader community. The illustration in Figure 3-11 highlights several key community development opportunities: ► The City must create connections between the park and other sections of Monticello. ► Building streets in a "parkway" design emphasizes the desired qualities of a regional park and of the surrounding Places to Live and Work. ► The park is a critical piece in creating a "greenway" system that links to the Mississippi River and may, over time, ring the community. Industrial Growth The Northwest area is a critical location for current and future industrial development. The Monticello Business Center, located south of Chelsea Road and west of 90th Street, has already started to be developed as a high amenity environment with protective covenants that address building materials, loading docks, outdoor storage, and landscaping. In order to provide sufficient land for Business Campus uses over the next 25 years, the Comprehensive Plan extends this land use south to the planned expansion of School Boulevard. It is important to recognize that activity generated by business development can create conflicts with residential development. The Comprehensive Plan seeks to create both high quality business parks and residential neighborhoods in this area. Careful site 3-18 1 Land Use City of Monticello Existing Natural ,` ~ Land/," Pot( Grei rj Cori V S Figure 3-11: Community Connections to Regional Park planning and development management will be needed to meet these objectives. School Boulevard Extension The Northwest Area serves as a good example of the need to coordination land use and transportation planning. An extension of School Boulevard is needed to provide access to the area and to connect development to the rest of the community. The route of this roadway should be identified and preserved as development occurs. School Boulevard has several other Comprehensive Plan implications: :ial Parkways Jo Mississippi River Existing Green Corridor ► This major collector street will influence the nature of adjacent land use. ► Streetscape improvements would help to define the high quality character desired by the City as a gateway to the Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park and to new neighborhoods. ► The street is a means for bringing trail connections to the park. Golf Course In 2006, the Silver Springs Golf Course was part of a development proposal (Jefferson at Monticello) that would have redeveloped this property mixing golf and housing. The development did not proceed beyond the environmental review. 2008 Comprehensive Plan — Updated 2014 Land Use 1 3-19 The Comprehensive Plan shows the area as Places to Recreate based on the continued use as a golf course. This designation does not preclude a future proposal and Comprehensive Plan amendment for residential development. It is likely, however, that this scale of new development will require the access provided by a new highway interchange. The Comprehensive Plan seeks to fill in other development areas and make effective use of other infrastructure investments before extending utilities for redevelopment of the golf course. Downtown Focus Area The Embracing Downtown Plan was adopted by City Council resolution 2012-011 on January 9, 2012 and is herein incorporated as an appendix of the Comprehensive Plan. Downtown Monticello needs special attention in the Comprehensive Plan. Following the 2008 Comprehensive Plan update, the community undertook a separate downtown planning process. This process resulted in the Embracing Downtown Plan. This Plan emphasizes the importance that the community places on Downtown. The 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update relies on the Embracing Downtown Plan as a guide for public and private actions in the Downtown area. Revitalizing and sustaining Downtown Monticello requires a collaborative effort of the City, businesses, property owners and other stakeholders. Planning for the future of the Downtown must recognize the practical realities facing commercial development in Downtown: ► The configuration and traffic volumes of Highway 25 significantly reduce opportunities for direct access from the Highway to adjacent properties. ► Traffic volumes on Highway 25 will continue to increase. Greater volumes and congestion act as an impediment for people living south of I-94 coming to Downtown. ► There is no controlled intersection on Highway 25 between Broadway and 7th Street. The lack of a controlled intersection combined with traffic volumes make pedestrian connections between Downtown and residential areas to the east very difficult. ► "Big box" and retail development continue to occur in other parts of Monticello. These businesses directly compete with the Downtown and attract smaller businesses (that might otherwise consider a Downtown location) to adjacent parcels. Downtown Goals Given current plans and conditions, the Embracing Downtown Plan and the Comprehensive Plan recommends the following goals for Downtown. Concepts for Downtown redevelopment should provide solutions to problems and issues identified in the research and analysis of Downtown conditions that are directed by the stated goals for Land Use, Transportation and Design and Image. The preferred solutions should be those that best meet these goals. Land Use ► Diversify land use in the Downtown; supplement retail and service uses with other activities that generate traffic. ► Encourage redevelopment of old and obsolete structures; encourage consolidation of small parcels with multiple ownerships. ► Balance parking and land use to ensure availability of adequate parking at all times. ► Encourage mixed use but do not make it a requirement or prerequisite for development or redevelopment. ► Discourage residential as a free-standing land use within the core downtown area. ► Establish physical connections between the core Downtown area and the riverfront and park. ► Encourage land uses that serve as evening and weekend attractions to the Downtown area. ► Expand facilities and parking adjacent to West Bridge Park to help create an anchor attraction at the north end of Walnut Street. Transportation ► Acknowledge that Highway 25 will be limited in terms of providing direct property access. ► Develop circulation patterns that utilize local streets for individual site access. 3-20 1 Land Use City of Monticello I -- LU LU z z J Figure 3-12: Framework Plan from the Embracing Downtown Plan w w LLJ w r F - 6TH STREET 4 U Civic a d p ivic F Public cu �NALE�IUT Ex. Retail _ J�" Y STREET 4TH STREET STREET 0 Ex. Retail Existing Retail, i-94 2008 Comprehensive Plan — Updated 2014 Land Use 1 3-21 ► Recognize Highway 25 as a barrier between the east and west parts of the historic Downtown core areas extending to either side of the Highway 25 corridor. ► Consider developing in districts to reduce the need or desire to cross Highway 25 between 7th street and the river crossing. ► Strengthen pedestrian ties throughout Downtown including connections to other parts of the City to the south, west, and east. Downplay Highway 25 as a corridor for pedestrian movement. ► Improve pedestrian connections between Broadway Street and the riverfront Park area to allow the park to serve as an attraction that brings people into the downtown area. ► Improve access to the Mississippi River to expand on recreational opportunities. ► Explore creation of a fourth signalized intersection on Highway 25 between 7th Street and Broadway Street to improve access to areas with development and redevelopment potential on either side of the Highway 25 corridor. Downtown Design and Image ► Encourage design standards that elevate the quality of Downtown development without creating undue hardships for property and building owners. ► Acknowledge that the historic "Main Street" buildings and developments along Broadway Street are functionally obsolete for many tenants and users in today's automobile and convenience - driven marketplace. ► The public realm of streets, boulevards and sidewalks represents the best opportunity to create an interim image for downtown as it redevelops. ► The Highway 25 and Broadway corridors should be softened with streetscape and landscape features to offset the effects of high traffic volumes, and to help establish an identity for the Central Community District (CCD). ► Development should orient toward the intersection of Highway 25 with Broadway to take advantage of high traffic volumes in the Highway 25 corridor. ► New development in the Highway 25 corridor should be scaled to allow visibility to development up to a block or more away from Highway 25. The Comprehensive Plan seeks to enhance the existing commercial core along Broadway by building strong connections with the riverfront and the civic/retail district on the south end of Walnut Street The current end of Walnut Street is a barrier to improving connections between Downtown and the riverfront. ► New buildings in the Highway 25 and Broadway corridors should be located to allow for eventual widening of the corridor right-of-way and roadway. ► To the extent possible, buildings should occupy street frontages and should front on public sidewalks with connections to a continuous "Downtown" sidewalk pedestrian system. 3-22 1 Land Use City of Monticello ► Proposed uses should have adequate parking (private or public) within easy and convenient walking distance. ► The Downtown plan should provide strategically located public gathering spaces to bring people together to experience a sense of community that is associated with downtown. South Central Focus Area Continued residential growth to the south is an important element of the Comprehensive Plan. This growth achieves several objectives: 71 I. It helps to facilitate the expansion of the sanitary sewer system in conjunction with the reconstruction of Fallon Avenue. This sanitary sewer capacity is needed to support future industrial growth area along Highway 25. These areas encourage growth in areas that could use the new eastern interchange with I-94 rather than Highway 25. These areas provide appropriate locations for continued growth in entry-level single family homes and medium density housing types. These Places to Live are important elements of maintaining an adequately diverse housing stock. Orderly expansion to the south moves development towards area of higher natural amenity. Areas along the southern edge of the Orderly Annexation Area provide another location for potential "move up" housing. Figure 3-13: Land Use Plan - South Central A key to development in this focus area is the construction of the Fallon Avenue bridge. The bridge leads to the reconstruction of Fallon Avenue and the related expansion of municipal sanitary sewer and water systems. Future development will be limited without additional utility capacity. East Focus Area The Comprehensive Plan places greater priority on growth to the west and south. Development should be directed to areas that most effectively achieve the objectives of this Plan. Several factors could cause the City to encourage future residential development in the East Focus Area: ► Increased overall housing demand that exceeds the capacity to support growth in other areas. ► Traffic congestion on Highway 25 that increases the need to channel use to the east interchange. ► The need to solve stormwater and drainage management issues (Ditch 33) in this area. Solving drainage issues allows eastward expansion along County Road 18. Future growth in the east should continue to fill in the development area within the Orderly Annexation Area on the east side of Monticello. The natural features in these areas allow for higher amenity neighborhoods. This growth can occur with new collector/arterial street corridors. Figure 3-14: Land Use Plan - East Focus Area L_J i NI w�i LI 2008 Comprehensive Plan — Updated 2014 Land Use 1 3-23 Ideally, the Comprehensive Plan does not have an Economic Development chapter. The Land Use Plan would be sufficient to channel market forces to meet the development objectives of the community. In reality, certain development needs cannot be met without public intervention. The Economic Development chapter of the Plan focuses on the aspects of Monticello's future that require particular attention and action by the City. These actions include: ► Attracting and retaining jobs ► Expanding the tax base ► Enhancing the economic vitality of Downtown ► Facilitating redevelopment Attracting and Retaining Jobs The creation and retention of jobs is one of the most important objectives for Monticello. Jobs, particularly jobs with income levels capable of supporting a family, are key to achieving many elements of Monticello's vision for the future. ► Jobs attract residents to the community. Jobs will pay a critical role in creating the type of "move up" housing sought by the City. ► Jobs provide the income needed to support local business and government services. ► Retention of businesses promote community stability by keeping jobs and residents in Monticello. The Community Context chapter of the Comprehensive Plan contains a section on Employment. This section contains data about employment in Monticello and of its residents. Among the key findings in this section are: ► While the community added nearly 5,000 people between 2000 and 2010 according to the U.S. Census, it only added 1,430 jobs according to the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW). In 2010, the community had 6,992 jobs according to the QCEW but 7,093 people in the labor force according to the Census. 2008 Comprehensive Plan — Updated 2013 Economic Development 1 4-1 ► The U.S. Census Bureau, Center for Economic Studies' OntheMap website shows that in 2010 4,597 people leave the community each day to work, while 3,849 people come into the community to work. Only 835 both live and work in the community. ► Approximately 15% of residents in 2010 are employed within the community. This has dropped from 18% in 2002. ► As shown in Figure 4.1, 2012 data from the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development (DEED) on their mnprospector.com website shows that Monticello is made up of a wide range of small to medium sized employers. Only 10 employers have more than 100 employees. Over half have fewer than four (4) employees. ► Workers for Monticello businesses come primarily from Monticello and the surrounding region. Nearly 75% of people working in Monticello live in Monticello, adjacent townships, or other places in Wright and Sherburne counties (2010 OntheMap). ► Nearly 40% of Monticello residents work in Hennepin County, with the largest percentage in Minneapolis, Plymouth, and Maple Grove. Another 15% work elsewhere in Wright County, including Buffalo and St. Michael. ► The 2007-2011 American Community Survey (ACS) Census reported a mean travel time to work of 28.5 minutes. This is up from the 2000 Census travel time of 24 minutes. The mean travel time in the 2007-2011 ACS was 29.7 minutes for Wright County and 24.5 minutes for the region overall. Figure 4-1:2012 Total Establishments by Size 1-4 Employees 254 52.05 5-9 Employees 97 19.88 10-19 Employees 64 13.11 20-49 Employees 42 8.61 50-99 Employees 21 4.30 100-249 Employees 7 1.43 250-499 Employees 2 0.41 500-999 Employees 1 0.20 Background Reports The City of Monticello conducts studies and assessments as needed to help guide its economic development efforts. The findings and recommendations of these studies are summarized below with the most recent provided first. 2010 Business Retention and Expansion Research (BR&E) Report Monticello's Business Retention and Expansion (BR&E) program was initiated by the City of Monticello, the Monticello Chamber of Commerce and Industry, DEED, and the University of Minnesota Extension. It was also sponsored by over a dozen local businesses. Through the BR&E program, 60 businesses were visited. Findings from the visits and data analysis found: ► 78% of the visited businesses were locally owned and operated. ► 20% of businesses were in manufacturing, 18% in retail trade, and 13% in other services. ► The businesses employed over 1,600 full-time and 975 part-time employees, with a trimmed average (an average where the low and high were discarded to prevent skewing) of 15.38 full-time employees, slightly down from 15.52 three years ago. The firms also had a trimmed average of 7.76 part-time employees, up from 6.96 three years ago. ► Most full-time employees are in manufacturing, food and beverage, retail trade, and medical, while part-time employees are in medical, retail trade, and tourism/recreational services. ► Survey results indicated that the medical industry is the highest employer in Monticello, followed by retail trade and manufacturing. ► Businesses in the community are fairly stable with about half expecting some type of change. The BR&E identified four strategies aimed at helping businesses become more profitable. Each strategy was accompanied by a list of potential projects intended to be ideas for the community to explore. The implementation of the projects is intended to be a collaborative effort among the various sectors of the community. The four strategies identified included: 4-2 1 Economic Development City of Monticello ► Improve Business Retention and Expansion Through Technical and Development Assistance. ► Improve Labor Force Availability and Productivity. ► Improve Infrastructure to Help Move Goods, Customers, and the Labor Force More Efficiently. ► Improve and Promote the Quality of Life in Monticello. During the 2013 comprehensive plan economic development update process, it was noted that the 2010 Business Retention and Expansion Research strategies were similar to the 2008 Development Strategies. The review process identified the need to continue similar strategies into the future. Preceding the development of the 2008 Comprehensive Plan an assessment was conducted by St. Cloud State University to determine whether a bioscience park should be established in Monticello. At that time the bioscience industry was an economic development focus statewide. While the attraction of a bioscience business is not a particular focus of Monticello today, there are findings of that study that can be useful to consider in the overall development of economic development strategies for the community. Some of the Monticello's strengths for attracting businesses included: ► Land availability (compared to Metro Area). ► Access to major highways (I-94, U.S. 10 and STH 25). ► Regional growth of employment base. ► Development of local fiber optic system. ► Proximity to universities. ► Overall location. ► Expansive park system. ► Monticello Community Center. Recommended business development activities that apply to the attraction and retention of all businesses include ensuring that there are sites suitable and attractive to potential businesses available and ready for development. The community should continue to explore and establish partnerships with a variety of stakeholders that can work together to support business attraction and retention. This includes the identification of funding sources which may be an incentive for businesses locating in Monticello. When available the City should participate in special tax zones that have been made available at the state and federal level to support business development and retention. Expanding the Tax Base A traditional objective of local economic development planning is the expansion of the property tax base. Under the current system of local government finance, property taxes are the largest source of city revenue. For this reason, it is an important aspect of economic development planning in Monticello. Understanding the Property Tax System Effective strategies to promote the growth of the tax base require a clear understanding of the property tax system. Property Valuation There are three forms of property valuation. The foundation of the property tax system is Estimated Market Value. This amount is the value of a parcel of property as set by the County Assessor. In some circumstances, the State Legislature limits the amount of Estimated Market Value that can be used for taxation. These adjustments result in the Taxable Market Value. The value used to calculate property taxes is Tax Capacity. Tax Capacity Value is a percentage of Taxable Market Value. The percentage factors are set by the State Legislature and vary by class of property. Changes in the Tax System Traditional economic development theory seeks commercial and industrial development as a means of building tax base. Historically, the system supported this approach. A dollar of estimated market value of commercial -industrial property carried a higher tax capacity value than residential property. Over the past twelve years, tax "reforms" by the State Legislature have changed this situation. 2008 Comprehensive Plan — Updated 2013 Economic Development 1 4-3 Figure 4-2: Changes in Tax Capacity Value - Commercial/Industrial 450,00 400,000 - 350,000 - 300,000 - 250,000 T Q v 200,000 m F 150,000 100,000 50,000 0 300,000 250,000 200,000 v T 150,000 CL M V X T F 100,000 50,000 0 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 to 2012 Figure 4-3: Tax Capacity Comparison Industrial Retail Office Single Townhome Apt Industrial Retail Office Single Townhome Apt Acres 10 10 10 10 10 10 Coverage 30% 30% 30% 3 6 12 Development (SF or Units) 130,680 130,680 130,680 30 60 120 EMV per SF or Unit 65 80 100 400,000 250,000 150,000 EMV 8,494,200 10,454,400 13,068,000 12,000,000 15,000,000 18,000,000 Tax Capacity 169,134 208,338 260,610 120,000 150,000 225,000 4-4 1 Economic Development City of Monticello The chart in Figure 4-2 shows how legislative changes have reduced the tax base created by commercial - industrial development. This chart is based on the tax capacity value for $3,000,000 of Taxable Market Value. The legislative changes in the rates used to set tax capacity mean that this property produced 56% less tax base in 2012 than in 1997. This trend takes on additional meaning when compared to other classifications of property. Figure 4-3 compares the tax capacity value for the primary forms of development in Monticello. The valuations in this chart are based on assumptions about the density of development and estimated market value of new development. Changes in these assumptions will alter the results. This chart clearly illustrates the current reality for economic development strategies. All forms of development contribute tax base to the community. It is risky placing too much weight on one type of development for tax base growth. In addition, cities do not control the critical elements of the tax system. Changes in the system lead to unanticipated results at the local level. Tax base growth has implications that are unique to Monticello. The chart in Figure 4-4 shows the distribution of taxes payable in 2011. Utilities, likely largely Xcel Energy, contributes about one-third of the City's taxes, while both commercial/industrial and residential uses contribute 28% each. Enhancing Downtown Maintaining a successful Downtown is an important element of the economic development plan for Monticello. Downtown is a key business district providing goods, services, and jobs for the community. Downtown is unlike any other business district because of its unique role in Monticello's identity and heritage. The Land Use chapter describes plans, policies, and strategies related to Downtown Monticello. Downtown is part of the Economic Development chapter because of the likelihood that city actions and investments Com m4, Figure 4-4: Distribution of 2011 Taxes Payable All Other 1,614,256 8% 18% -ublic Utility 9,707,817 50% will be needed to achieve community objectives for Downtown. This intervention may include: ► Public improvements to provide services or to enhance the Downtown environment. ► Provision of adequate parking supply. ► Acquisition of land. ► Preparation of sites for development. ► Removal of other physical and economic barriers to achieve community objectives. These actions may require the use of tax increment financing, tax abatement, or other finance tools available to the City. In 2011, the City of Monticello conducted a retail market study for Downtown Monticello. The report, Embracing Downtown Monticello, has been incorporated in the Comprehensive Plan as an appendix and serves as a resource for the implementation of the Comprehensive Plan. The study included many components including an identification and analysis of existing businesses, evaluation of shopping areas that are competition for Downtown, a survey of customers, delineation of the trade area, and the establishment of market demand for various businesses. 2008 Comprehensive Plan — Updated 2013 Economic Development 1 4-5 Some findings of the study included: ► Downtown Monticello enjoys a strategic location between the Mississippi River and I-94. This focuses traffic on TH-25 resulting in traffic counts higher in Downtown than south of I-94 ► Due to physical barriers created by the Mississippi River and I-94, about one-third of Downtown and secondary trade area shoppers must pass through Downtown Monticello to reach the shopping areas south of I-94. ► Downtown has the largest concentration of shopping goods stores and restaurants. ► Downtown's trade area population was estimated at 93,500 in 2010 and is projected to have an annual growth rate of 2.2%. ► Monticello's large anchor stores (Cub Foods, SuperTarget, Walmart, and Home Depot) create a secondary trade area. The population of the combined Downtown and secondary trade areas was 127,190 in 2010. ► CentraCare Health System, with 25 beds and 600 employees has established Monticello as a regional medical center. ► Increased residential development stimulates increased commercial development. The recent economic conditions have slowed residential development, thus resulting in reduced tenant demand for retail space. ► Additional retail space in Downtown Monticello can be supported by the trade area population. A range of store types can be considered including shopping goods, convenience goods, and food establishments. Downtown's existing wide variety of services limits potential future opportunities. However, market research indicates that Monticello could support additional medical practices. Figure 4-5: Embracing Downtown Monticello Primary and Secondary Trade Areas ir# Q 6owrdonn Sra]■ J.na J ' Q 1&M1d J TFKW JUN ■ ; a a a �Sewe i' • 6L4�1� c CW rW X011 Mvc. GN0.4% ltd MM CV11 4-6 1 Economic Development City of Monticello i T - i Vis■ � � • R ■ MM CV11 4-6 1 Economic Development City of Monticello Facilitating Redevelopment The Comprehensive Plan seeks to create a place where land use plans, policies, and controls work together with private investment to properly maintain all properties in Monticello. It is recognized that this approach may not succeed in all locations. Despite the best plans and intentions, properties may become physically deteriorated and/or economically inviable. In such places, city intervention may be need to facilitate redevelopment and prevent the spread of blight. This intervention may include: ► Acquisition of land. ► Preparation of sites for development. ► Construction or reconstruction of public improvements. ► Provision of adequate parking supply. ► Remediation of polluted land as needed. ► Removal of other physical and economic barriers to achieve community objectives. These actions may require the use of tax increment financing, tax abatement, or other finance tools available to the City. Development Strategies The following strategies will be used to implement the Comprehensive Plan in the area of Economic Development: 1. The City must use the Comprehensive Plan to provide adequate locations for future job - producing development (Places to Work). 2. The City should adhere to the Comprehensive Plan to encourage stable business setting and promote investment and expansion of facilities. 3. The City should coordinate utility planning and manage other development to ensure that expansion areas are capable of supporting new development in a timely manner. 4. The City will continue to work with existing businesses to maintain an excellent business environment, retain jobs, and facilitate expansions. 5. In addition to assisting business seeking to locate in Monticello, the City should actively target and market to businesses which will be a supplier, customer or collaborative partner to existing businesses within the community. 6. The City should target and market to businesses which would benefit from Monticello's utility and communications infrastructure. 7. The City will work with the CentraCare Health System to ensure the retention and to promote the expansion of health care services in Monticello. 8. The City will use the Comprehensive Plan to maintain and enhance the quality of life in Monticello as a tool for attracting businesses and jobs. 2008 Comprehensive Plan - Updated 2013 Economic Development 1 4-7 CITY OF �01 kdo COUNCIL CONNECTION SEPTEMBER 25, 2017 ADMINISTRATION WCAT Budget Update The most recent Wright County Area Transportation board budget summary is included in the following pages. CITY OF ANNANDALE Trial Balance Page. 1 GL Period 08/17 Sep 11, 2017 03 27PM WRIGHT COUNTY AREA TRANSPORTAT Report Criteria: Actual Amounts All Accounts Include FUNDS: 705 Page and Total by FUND All Segments Tested for Total Breaks Account Debit Credit Number Title Amount Amount 705-00000 WCAT 00 705-10101 CASH ACCOUNT (BANK) 6,750.02 705-11500 ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE .00 705-13800 INTEREST RECEIVABLE 00 705-20200 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 00 705-20211 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE ALLOCATION 00 705-27200 RETAINED EARNINGS --UNRESERVED 12,66363- 705-28000 NET ASSETS .00 705-36210-000 INTEREST REVENUE 4 19- 705-38011-000 INITIAL FEE REVENUE .00 705-38012-000 SERVICE REVENUE 82,384 10- 705-49804-304 LEGAL FEES 2,561.40 705-49804-307 SERVICE FEE 85,73050 705-49804-312 CONSULTING FEES 00 705-49804-437 MISCELLANEOUS 1000 Total WRIGHT COUNTYAREA TRANSPORTAT 95,05192 95,051.92 - Grand Totals 95,051 92 95,051.92- CITY OF ANNANDALE DETAIL REVENUES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET FOR THE 8 MONTHS ENDING AUGUST 31, 2017 FUND 705 - WRIGHT COUNTY AREA TRANSPORTAT PERIOD BUDGET %OF ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL AMOUNT VARIANCE BUDGET SOURCE36 705-36210-000 INTEREST REVENUE .85 419 .00 4.19 .00 TOTAL SOURCE 36 85 4.19 00 4.19 00 SOURCE38 705-38011-000 INITIAL FEE REVENUE .00 .00 00 .00 .00 705-38012-000 SERVICE REVENUE 82,38410 82,384.10 .00 82,384.10 .00 TOTAL SOURCE 38 82,384.10 82,38410 00 82,38410 00 TOTAL FUND REVENUE 82,38495 82,38829 .00 82,38829 00 FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY 67 % THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED 09/11/2017 03 27PM PAGE 1 CITY OF ANNANDALE DETAIL EXPENDITURES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET FOR THE 8 MONTHS ENDING AUGUST 31, 2017 FUND 705 - WRIGHT COUNTY AREA TRANSPORTAT DEPARTMENT 498 705-49804-304 LEGAL FEES 705-49804-307 SERVICE FEE 705-49804-312 CONSULTING FEES 705-49804-437 MISCELLANEOUS TOTAL DEPARTMENT 498 PERIOD BUDGET ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL AMOUNT %OF BUDGET .00 2,56140 00 ( 2,561.40) 88,301 90) 00 85,73050 85,73050 00 ( 85,730.50) 5,91361) 00 00 00 .00 .00 .00 1000 1000 .00 ( 10 00) .00 85,740.50 88,301.90 00 ( 88,301.90) 00 TOTAL FUND EXPENDITURES 85,740.50 88,301 90 .00 ( 88,301 90) .00 NET REVENUES OVER EXPENDITURES ( 3,35555) ( 5,913.61) 00 ( 5,91361) 00 FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY 67 % THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED 09/11/2017 03 27PM PAGE 2 CITY OF Monti efl0 COUNCIL CONNECTION SEPTEMBER 25, 2017 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Hi -Way Liquors Sign Upon developing the public hearing notice information for the hearing on amendment to PUD for the Hi -Way Liquors sign, staff noted the sign is located on a parcel owned by MnDOT. As such, the hearing cannot he held without the property owner's signature. Staff will therefore cancel the hearing until documentation can be found on any agreement allowing the sign in that area and further direction on next steps can be determined. Post Office Construction The U.S. Postal Service has begun construction on improvements to the annex property on 711 Street. City staff has requested information on site planning and has received drawings for review. Staff will be in touch with the Postal Service representative to discuss site plan, timeline and to understand their Postal Service's intended use of the building. Recent Court Ruling Regarding Roadway Fees An article by Eric Roper appeared in the Star Tribune on September 18, 2017 that outlined the impact to cities after a MN appeals court invalidated roadway fees charged by the City of Woodbury. The full article can be viewed here: Court ruling on Woodbury road fee could shift costs to taxpayers. v CITY OF Montido COUNCIL CONNECTION AUGUST, 2017 113 LVj Transactions August 2017, the DMV processed 4,537 transactions 1,840 less than August 2016. DMV year -to date revenue is $415,193.81 and increase of $24,700.81 or 6.3% over the same period last year. Please see the following graphs for more detail. The state switched over to a new program on July 251hof this year. The new program does not work the way they had anticipated. As you can see with the decrease in transactions, there were many customers we were not able to serve. The program problems still exist. With the conversion deputy registrar offices knew they were taking on work that the state use to do. We had no idea that a title transfer that use to take 5 minutes is now taking 10 to 15 minutes. Moving forward, the state has implemented some work-arounds in order for us to serve most customers. On a positive note - Due to the conversion, many offices were not able to keep up with their dealer work. Our office was approached by several dealers mid-August. We are now doing transactions for the following new dealerships. In Elk River, KIA, Cornerstone Ford and Cornerstone Chrysler. In St. Michael we are now serving Bison Motorcycle, and in Monticello Cornerstone Chevrolet. $70,000 $60,000 $50,000 $40,000 $30,000 $20,000 $10,000 7,000 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 $450,000 $400,000 $350,000 $300,000 $250,000 $200,000 $150,000 $100,000 $50,000 60,000 50,000 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 DMV Revenue Comparison SS7.346 Aug 2011 Aug 2012 Aug 2013 Aug 2014 Aug 2015 Aug 2016 Aug 2017 DMV Transaction Comparison 6,377 Aug 2011 Aug 2012 Aug 2013 Aug 2014 Aug 2015 Aug 2016 Aug 2017 DMV Year -to -Date Revenue Comparison Aug 2011 Aug 2012 Aug 2013 Aug 2014 Aug 2015 Aug 2016 Aug 2017 DMV Year -to -Date Transaction Comparison 54,769 Aug 2011 Aug 2012 Aug 2013 Aug 2014 Aug 2015 Aug 2016 Aug 2017 CITY OF �01 kdo COUNCIL CONNECTION SEPTEMBER 25, 2017 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT • Attended Rotary Club Meeting - August 7, 2017 • Meeting with local business owner - August 7, 2017 Purpose of the meeting was a follow-up to discuss identified issues revealed during the BRE (Business Retention & Expansion) visit. This follow-up focused on the company's desire to explore financing options for potential purchase of new manufacturing machinery to allow pursuit of a new line of business. Additional follow up is occurring. • Meeting with Real Estate Broker — August 10, 2017 Purpose of the meeting was to review the downtown small area study status and concepts with broker. • Attended Community Ventures Network Meeting — August, 2017 Purpose of the meeting was to review progress points regarding the concept residential development project at the Rand Mansion property • Attended Rotary Club Meeting — August 14, 2017 • Attended Monticello Chamber of Commerce Luncheon Meeting — August 15, 2017 • Meeting with Developer — August 15, 2017 Purpose of the meeting was to provide an update to developer about housing study and discuss community needs and indicators • On Site Meeting/tour of industrial prospect — August 16, 2017 Purpose of the meeting/tour was to verify the prospects operations and potential fit in Otter Creek Business Park • Attended Rotary Club Meeting — August 21, 2017 • Attended Rotary Club Meeting — August 28, 2017 • Meeting with Bondhus regarding expansion proposal — August 29, 2017 Angela convened meeting to review expansion concept, special issues noted by the company and also review process and timeline. Job creation projections and local economic impacts were also discussed. Information was provided to Bondhus regarding various funding ideas. Additional follow-up is occurring Council Connection — 09/25/17 with more information received from Minnesota DEED to be outlined and provided to Bondhus officials in the future. • Attended Swan Sculpture Unveiling Event — August 31, 2017 • Attended meeting with developer to discuss concept housing project — Sept. 6, 2017 Purpose of meeting was to review concept and possible issues and provide updates as to timeline • Attended EDA Marketing Committee Meeting — Sept. 7, 2017 EDA subcommittee was formed to brainstorm ideas for marketing methods and allocate $22,000 +/- to various purposes. This was then taken to the EDA meeting for consideration as a 2018 marketing plan. EDA approved the plan. • Attended Rotary Club Meeting — Sept. 11, 2017 • Participated in Data Center Site Selection Webinar - sponsor EDAM — Sept. 13, 2017 Purpose of the webinar was to learn more about what type of sites data centers look for, the economic impacts of data centers and the available incentive packages in Minnesota. • Attended Rotary Sponsored Taste of the Town Event — Sept. 14, 2017 • Attended Rotary Club Meeting — Sept. 18, 2017 • Participated in Wright Co. Real Estate Broker Event — Fox Hollow Golf Course, Sept. 19, 2017 Purpose was to introduce Monticello's assets and development opportunities to the regional real estate brokers and developers. Additional follow up is planned in future. The attendance list will be used for marketing activities. • Meeting with Peter Bruce, Pedestrian Studies/Downtown Vitality Consultant — Sept. 20, 2017 Purpose of the meeting was to share progress point of the downtown small area study and discuss possible service offerings that may align with implementation steps of the Small Area Study. CITY OF Monti eff0 COUNCIL CONNECTION SEPTEMBER 25, 2017 FINANCE: I.T. Mississippi Room Wireless Internet Access In September FiberNet upgraded the wireless internet access in the Mississippi Room to better accommodate users' needs during public meetings and room rentals. Previously, wireless access was strongest in the back of the room rather than spread consistently throughout the space. In response, FiberNet installed a stronger wireless router in a new location to provide a better signal. The new router seems to be working well, but staff will continue to monitor the wireless access in the room to see if any additional changes are required. CITY OF �01 kdo COUNCIL CONNECTION SEPTEMBER 25, 2017 HI -WAY LIQUORS Sales through August 31, 2017 Attached are schedules and charts for total sales in each major sales category through the end of August 2017. Hi -Way Liquors Sales Report 8/31/2017 Total Sales Month 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Jan $ 249,670.43 $ 316,280.10 $ 300,631.85 $ 296,838.64 $ 302,114.52 $ 328,004.13 $ 355,029.76 $ 380,425.45 $ 364,675.32 $ 356,295.18 Feb 255,440.36 284,988.38 285,584.50 315,239.00 307,385.41 337,923.99 333,487.18 347,777.77 362,746.98 364,836.39 Mar 295,257.14 318,050.39 324,062.21 335,032.60 388,195.21 408,071.17 377,391.62 388,003.16 401,256.91 417,005.50 Apr 281,365.81 346,738.34 369,112.88 389,543.24 347,321.09 388,395.50 389,250.82 421,280.89 428,729.44 448,141.63 May 377,177.10 384,337.08 399,489.67 409,309.12 433,829.01 436,195.21 498,095.67 523,401.05 482,917.95 503,867.81 Jun 350,727.93 381,782.23 377,458.15 409,726.07 461,423.68 440,255.04 426,392.73 474,203.81 470,585.33 521,559.76 Jul 409,870.50 430,838.23 466,122.69 466,738.15 447,452.18 485,459.76 479,174.06 542,973.27 527,519.46 563,935.31 Aug 409,575.96 383,523.07 386,245.30 408,734.83 445,158.94 503,181.84 484,955.71 470,505.22 462,669.36 497,201.21 Sep 317,846.07 346,900.80 346,557.62 373,719.64 390,399.33 379,381.19 397,495.82 439,444.29 448,218.93 - Oct 351,268.98 360,742.04 375,367.40 365,702.14 372,676.23 396,328.87 409,967.74 460,096.82 454,442.30 Nov 332,605.88 341,875.49 360,661.96 376,855.40 421,960.12 424,038.37 465,299.53 474,241.74 444,533.08 Dec 436,379.03 454,982.63 485,617.01 505,482.70 527,865.36 518,379.58 549,200.76 569,707.38 605,509.16 Total $4,067,185.19 $4,351,038.78 $4,476,911.24 $4,652,921.53 $4,845,781.08 $5,045,614.65 $5,165,741.40 $5,492,060.85 $ 5,453,804.22 $ 3,672,842.79 Change $ 283,853.59 $ 125,872.46 $ 176,010.29 $ 192,859.55 $ 199,833.57 $ 120,126.75 $ 326,319.45 $ (38,256.63) $(1,780,961.43) Change % 7.0% 2.9% 3.9% 4.1% 4.1% 2.4% 6.3% -0.7% -32.7% $700,000 $600,000 $500,000 $400,000 ■ $300,000 $200,000 $100,000 $- Jan Feb Mar Apr Monthly Hi -Way Sales May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct ■ 2008 ■ 2009 ■ 2010 ■ 2011 ■ 2012 ■ 2013 ■ 2014 2015 2016 ■ 2017 Nov Dec CYM-LYM -2.3% 0.6% 3.9% 4.5% 4.3% 10.8% 6.9% 7.5% Y -T -D -2.3% -0.9% 0.8% 1.9% 2.4% 4.0% 4.5% 4.9% Hi -Way Liquors Sales Report 8/31/2017 Beer Month 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 CYM-LYM Y -T -D Jan $ 122,218.36 $ 157,849.78 $ 146,246.32 $ 143,906.08 $ 149,406.45 $ 160,903.32 $ 173,814.13 $ 191,370.26 $ 176,483.68 $ 174,846.99 -0.9% -0.9% Feb 121,734.33 137,055.23 140,624.54 150,075.08 150,589.28 162,865.75 161,168.63 164,508.11 175,055.27 179,346.12 2.5% 0.8% Mar 138,889.05 155,196.13 164,157.70 163,595.55 203,957.25 192,607.52 185,325.68 192,955.79 199,141.66 208,926.70 4.9% 2.3% Apr 146,613.65 178,834.20 189,978.23 194,504.16 179,486.77 186,134.31 198,195.77 219,756.39 228,133.10 234,069.51 2.6% 2.4% May 201,232.14 210,097.48 223,678.47 208,963.65 227,664.73 234,738.30 256,188.77 259,306.91 250,403.11 262,275.25 4.7% 2.9% Jun 193,801.97 207,793.83 206,043.42 224,769.03 259,671.21 243,389.79 238,322.11 263,421.95 263,264.15 296,531.85 12.6% 4.9% Jul 226,317.96 229,199.79 260,971.50 258,734.60 253,648.64 273,319.54 265,555.32 301,867.65 296,513.68 315,848.83 6.5% 5.2% Aug 226,653.65 203,222.86 211,996.32 216,546.53 242,179.20 281,577.25 267,802.95 253,141.21 250,255.41 268,173.42 7.2% 5.5% Sep 166,679.60 183,586.32 183,865.70 199,170.24 208,974.88 202,213.80 211,854.94 233,215.56 238,333.55 - Oct 176,382.34 179,873.10 190,893.27 180,043.06 187,386.57 191,764.20 210,454.13 234,882.09 224,253.93 Nov 158,322.50 154,584.13 168,265.14 171,866.27 195,276.37 192,162.71 202,081.91 207,055.40 213,333.23 Dec 187,691.06 190,655.19 203,080.13 216,560.71 224,952.83 217,491.21 234,178.12 241,996.27 253,223.11 Total $2,066,536.61 $2,187,948.04 $2,289,800.74 $2,328,734.96 $2,483,194.18 $2,539,167.70 $2,604,942.46 $2,763,477.59 $ 2,768,393.88 $ 1,940,018.67 Change $ 121,411.43 $ 101,852.70 $ 38,934.22 $ 154,459.22 $ 55,973.52 $ 65,774.76 $ 158,535.13 $ 4,916.29 $ (828,375.21) Change % 5.9% 4.7% 1.7% 6.6% 2.3% 2.6% 6.1% 0.2% -29.9% Monthly Beer Sales $350,000 $300,000 $250,000 $200,000 $150,000 $100,000 $50,000 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug ■ 2008 ■ 2009 ■ 2010 ■ 2011 ■ 2012 ■ 2013 ■ 2014 ■ 2015 ■ 2016 Sep Oct Nov Dec 02017 Hi -Way Liquors Sales Report 8/31/2017 Liquor Month 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Jan $ 73,930.87 $ 92,370.42 $ 91,472.50 $ 91,279.01 $ 93,085.69 $ 103,977.89 $ 113,943.25 $ 118,577.85 $ 118,211.20 $ 114,509.99 Feb 74,261.89 83,513.27 85,484.92 96,541.21 92,489.93 106,387.16 107,609.55 112,198.85 113,060.59 117,361.15 Mar 78,870.42 88,569.65 93,133.42 101,047.04 112,244.43 124,487.55 116,316.49 118,269.49 118,839.79 131,238.09 Apr 76,735.80 90,627.19 95,025.54 110,898.81 98,080.67 113,594.37 115,579.47 123,841.34 126,073.89 130,114.53 May 103,409.29 102,041.75 106,395.62 111,586.59 114,299.35 127,622.31 135,370.38 140,116.66 129,009.36 142,237.28 Jun 91,805.81 103,580.02 102,086.20 115,136.72 128,604.32 124,019.90 120,291.71 136,716.81 135,763.26 147,813.59 Jul 105,782.85 118,883.98 122,861.98 130,624.19 123,672.73 139,270.04 139,967.77 155,436.54 150,173.35 160,220.37 Aug 106,489.25 103,977.01 101,487.43 113,869.37 126,065.14 141,197.73 138,660.76 136,440.40 135,841.14 144,263.78 Sep 88,448.34 94,335.50 94,528.17 103,373.64 109,153.56 107,605.71 115,119.19 129,195.42 130,101.01 - Oct 97,046.60 102,236.90 102,983.14 103,533.14 106,326.73 116,677.74 124,271.15 140,198.97 128,290.50 Nov 97,348.39 90,996.73 102,298.02 105,501.75 120,127.29 126,412.24 134,241.85 132,261.11 134,208.12 Dec 135,221.23 143,684.12 153,690.60 159,717.50 172,370.96 175,523.36 184,746.26 190,944.24 205,335.83 Total $1,129,350.74 $1,214,816.54 $1,251,447.54 $1,343,108.97 $1,396,520.80 $1,506,776.00 $1,546,117.83 $1,634,197.68 $ 1,624,908.04 $ 1,087,758.78 Change $ 85,465.80 $ 36,631.00 $ 91,661.43 $ 53,411.82 $ 110,255.21 $ 39,341.83 $ 88,079.85 $ (9,289.64) $ (537,149.26) Change % 7.6% 3.0% 7.3% 4.0% 7.9% 2.6% 5.7% -0.6% -33.1% Monthly Liquor Sales $250,000 $200,000 $150,000 $100,000 $50,000 Jan Feb Mar Apr May .19h Jun Jul Aug ■ 2008 ■ 2009 ■ 2010 ■ 2011 ■ 2012 ■ 2013 ■ 2014 2015 2016 ■ 2017 Sep Oct Nov Dec CYM-LYM Y -T -D -3.1% -3.1% 3.8% 0.3% 10.4% 3.7% 3.2% 3.6% 10.3% 5.0% 8.9% 5.7% 6.7% 5.9% 6.2% 5.9% Hi -Way Liquors Sales Report 8/31/2017 Wine Month 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 CYM-LYM Y -T -D Jan $ 30,700.42 $ 41,810.19 $ 43,324.18 $ 48,437.59 $ 50,238.83 $ 54,949.83 $ 59,391.16 $ 61,128.65 $ 60,454.56 $ 57,275.16 -5.3% -5.3% Feb 33,407.17 39,410.85 42,230.84 52,847.05 54,642.27 60,573.12 57,228.51 62,600.47 64,797.38 58,664.45 -9.5% -7.4% Mar 47,603.93 45,525.38 46,165.18 54,639.16 57,735.22 77,810.58 66,425.24 67,121.51 71,840.82 64,286.75 -10.5% -8.6% Apr 31,755.42 48,303.48 61,146.04 62,289.18 57,973.74 79,736.19 63,101.05 63,285.56 61,268.24 69,415.79 13.3% -3.4% May 38,522.75 40,963.86 45,733.08 68,701.95 78,740.40 62,491.07 92,083.62 109,512.94 87,333.35 82,724.29 -5.3% -3.9% Jun 31,796.95 37,522.00 44,211.14 49,089.65 56,607.74 59,523.15 54,270.56 59,036.14 54,889.39 58,623.08 6.8% -2.4% Jul 36,909.44 41,813.65 48,334.93 49,664.45 54,467.20 57,115.44 57,743.98 66,029.11 60,750.62 64,034.24 5.4% -1.4% Aug 35,932.62 41,333.00 46,871.28 53,172.68 61,825.30 64,057.61 62,446.04 63,546.01 60,015.78 66,304.12 10.5% 0.0% Sep 33,830.69 39,798.20 47,859.52 53,916.37 60,317.17 59,121.12 59,409.30 62,210.27 65,294.31 - Oct 45,750.04 48,422.79 58,081.87 60,949.40 66,423.82 75,606.28 63,659.41 70,038.32 89,005.29 Nov 50,106.64 66,331.86 71,928.30 85,933.28 97,249.52 96,824.40 117,402.23 122,947.90 83,896.45 Dec 75,866.80 84,285.84 101,676.19 109,267.01 116,610.70 113,008.24 115,617.50 120,274.96 129,536.28 - Total $ 492,182.87 $ 575,521.10 $ 657,562.55 $ 748,907.77 $ 812,831.91 $ 860,817.03 $ 868,778.60 $ 927,731.84 $ 889,082.47 $ 521,327.88 Change $ 83,338.23 $ 82,041.45 $ 91,345.22 $ 63,924.14 $ 47,985.12 $ 7,961.57 $ 58,953.24 $ (38,649.37) $ (367,754.59) Change % 16.9% 14.3% 13.9% 8.5% 5.9% 0.9% 6.8% -4.2% -41.4% $140,000 $120,000 $100,000 $80,000 Monthly Wine Sales $60,000 1 $40,000 $20,000 11 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov ■ 2008 ■ 2009 ■ 2010 ■ 2011 I ■ 2012 IF ■ 2013 ■ 2014 2015 2016 ■ 2017 Dec $6.0 $5.5 $5.0 c $4.5 $4.0 $3.5 $3.0 Liquor Store Sales - Rolling 12 Month Periods 3 N N — O J E1 w O J E1 w O 3 N N — O 3 N N O J E1 w O J d d — O 3 d d — O J 91 91 l0 O N N W A V1 Ol V CITY OF MontiCeffo COUNCIL CONNECTION SEPTEMBER 25, 2017 MONTICELLO COMMUNITY CENTER (MCC) Transactions and visits Year to date (8.31.17), the MCC processed X transactions. The MCC year to date revenue is $1,166,610, a decrease of $12,416 from the same time last year. Year to date membership visits are 93,941 and MCC memberships are at a total of 5480 active individual members. Fall pool renovation The pool renovation will start on September 25 and be completed by November 8. Projects to be completed during this timeframe include: LED lighting upgrades, pool resurfacing and aquatic play structure replacement. During this six week closure MCC members may use the City of Becker's community center pool and aquatic fitness classes at no charge. We also have extra swimming opportunities available through Community Education. Please check our website for more information. Friendship Island MCC's successful summer program, Friendship Island, generated $11,645.00 in profit this summer. Friendship Island is a summer child care program for school aged children. New in 2017, Friendship Island operated out of 2 locations to separate K -2nd and 3rd -6th graders. Many parents expressed positive feedback. Upcoming Fall Events MCC is partnering with the Monticello Chamber of Commerce to expand the popular Downtown Trick -or -Treat event to West Bridge Park on Thursday, October 26, 4:00pm- 6:30pm. Businesses and organizations without a storefront downtown are invited to set-up in West Bridge Park and hand out treats. KRWC will provide fun games and a food truck, Gess What's Cookin', will be present. Color Me Fall at Bertram Chain of Lakes Park is a new event replacing MCC's annual Halloween Kiddie Parade. The Community Center has partnered with Wright County Parks, YMCA Camp Manitou and the Friends of Bertram for a fun -filled fall event on Saturday, October 28,10:00am to 2:00pm. Hayrides, fall games and activities, and a campfire with 'smores are just some of the highlights. Council Connection — 09/25/17 Power of Produce Club The Power of Produce Kids Club at the Farmers' Market continues to keep kids interested in trying and buying fresh fruits and vegetables at the Farmers' Market. A total of 717 kids have enrolled and spent $2,270 at the market buying fresh fruits and vegetables. The program is supported through donations and grants. The Farmers' Market runs through October 19. Monticello Community Center: Year to Date REVENUE R EXPENSE STATEMENT Ar gust 2017 TO -DATE TOTAL 1 BUDGET BUDGET 1 VARIANCE VARIANCE 1 I I I 1 4,753 10 7.6%1 36,087 10 1 0 IO 0.0%1 18,333 0 1 3,832 I0 21.7%1 12,665 10 1 4,03710 19.0951 14,63710 1 2,467 IO 100.0951 3,70010 1 6,667 IO 100.0951 10,00010 1 (8,483)IQ -18.8951 14,08310 1 321 IO 32.1951 82110 1 [27,508}10 -4.7%1 264,15810 1 14,04310 31.4%1 36,37610 1 18,33210 11.7951 96,85810 1 (430}14 -25.8%1 40310 1 (9,893}1Q -197.9%1 (7,393)10 1 6,18710 63.5%1 11,060 Is 1 1,333 Q 100.0%1 2,000 10 r 15,6571 r 513,7901 1 62,00010 25.0%1 186,00010 I - I I - I I 77,657 I 1 599,790 1 I I I 1 (17,855}1 _i -3.1%1 272,975 10 1 11,23410 7.0%1 92,01910 1 4,56810 13.4951 21,61810 1 {4,714}10 -35.4951 1,953 10 1 8,17510 572%1 15,32510 1 279 IQ 0.9%1 15,94510 1 7,74114 382%1 17,87410 1 10,890 IQ 59.4%1 20,05610 1 (2,318)1-- -6.1%1 16,59810 1 (545)10 -27.2%1 455 10 1 1,73310 100.0%1 2,60010 1 3,13310 74.6%1 5,23310 1 2,737 IQ 2.3%1 61,07010 1 1,066 IQ 10.3%1 6,23110 1 [44,388}10 -226.5%1 (34,588)10 1 90,89510 77.2%1 149,72910 1 2,47810 97.8%1 3,74510 1 209 IO 1.6%1 6,87610 1 {90,178}10 -287.8%1 {74,512}10 1 (2,459)IQ -91.9%1 {1,121}10 -I I - I 1 (17,319)1 1 6w,0811 5.195 0.0% 14.595 12.7% 66.7% 66.7% -12.5% 21.4% -3.1% 21.0% 7.8% -17.2% -131.9% 42.3% 66.7% 16.7% -2% 5% 995 -24% 38% 1% 25% 40% 4% -10% 67% 50% 2% 7% -151% 51% 65% 1% -192% -61% Greater than 1096 positive variance Less than 10% variance Greater than 10% negative variance 2017 2011 1 2017 2017 1 2016 FULL YEAR TO -DATE August YR -TO -DATE( YR -TO -DATE _ BUDGET BUDGET _ BALANCE BALANCE BALANCE REVENUE ROOM RENTAL 94,000 62,667 5,317 57,913 60,313 ROOM RENTAL INTERNAL USE 55,000 36,667 1 4,583 36,667 1 36,667 PARTY ROOM RENTAL 26,500 17,667 1 688 13,835 1 15,475 (WEDDING RENTALS 31,800 21,200 2,195 17,163 18,844 (CHAPEL RENTAL 3,700 2,467 - - 2,012 (FACILITIES LEASE 10,000 6,667 - - 5,906 CONCESSIONS 67,700 45,1331 1 4,431 53.617 r 5 1, 927 VENDING COMMJREFUND 1,500 1,000 1 1 25 679 1 818 MEMBERSHIPSJDAILY 875,000 583,3331 1 66,611 610,8421 1 582,170 USER FEES 67,000 44,6671 1 2,987 30,624 1 1 42,444 (PROGRAM FEES 235,580 157,053 3,553 138,722 168,186 FARMERS' MARKET FEES 2,500 1,667 1 1 - 2,097 1 1 2,201 CONTRIBUTIONS 7,500 5,0001 1 250 14,8931 1 7,050 IMISC REVENUE 14,620 9,747 26 3,560 3,013 (INTEREST 2,000 1,3331 - - ITOTAL REVENUE BEFORE TAXES 1,494,40D 996,267 I r 9D,666 98fl,610 I r 997,026 r (TAXES 372,000 248,0001 186,0001 182,000 (OPERATING TRANSFER IN - - - TOTAL REVENUE 1,866,4100 1,244,267 1 1 90,666 _ _ 1s166z51D� _ _1 1,179,026 EXPEN SES 1 (SALARIES 872,488 581,6591 1 78,817 599,513 ( 557,172 EMPLOYEE TAXES J BENEFITS 242,356 161,571 18,414 150,337 141,597 SUPPLIES -OFFICE 51,150 34,1001 1 3,576 29,5321 _ 1 21,720 (SUPPLIES -BUILDING 20,000 13,333 4,760 18,047 21,216 (SUPPLIES -RECREATION 21,450 14,3001 1,793 6,125 11,116 (SUPPLIES - CONCESSIONS 47,000 31,3331 2,472 31,0551 33,596 (SUPPLIES - REPAIRSIMAINTENANCE 30,400 20,2671 1 1,124 12,5261 1 18,313 SUPPLIES -OTHER 27,500 18,3331 1 564 7,4441 1 1,771 PROF SERVICES - ITIDATA TECH 56,747 37,831 1 1 3,277 40,1491 1 37,431 PROF SERVICES - RECREATION 3,000 2,000 1 1 1,285 2,545 1 1 14,004 PROF SERVICES - CLEANINGJMAINT 2,600 1,733 1 1 - - 1 1 5,639 (PROF SERVICES - MARKETING 6,300 4,200 - 1,067 2,635 PROF SERVICES - UT1LIT ES 175,000 116,6671 1 14,731 113,930 1 1 104,280 PROF SERVICES - INSURANCE 15,497 10,331 1 1 - 9,2661 1 11,879 PROF SERVICES - OTHER 29,400 19,600 1 1 11,801 63,988 1 6,219 (REPAIRS 176,500 117,6671 1 16,102 26,771 39,185 (RENTALS 3,800 2,5331 - 551 1,512 (BANK CHARGES 20,000 13,333 1,344 13,124 13,358 (CAPITAL OUTLAY 47,000 31,333 53,708 121,512 (OTHER MISC EXPENDITURES 4,012 2,675 253 5,133 5,744 (OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT - - - - TOTAL EXPENSES 1,852,21}0 1,234,81}0 1 1 214,020 1,252,1191 1 1,048,386 2016 YEAR END ACTUAL 89,812 55,000 21,529 26,236 2,012 10,102 68,218 861 861,882 60,459 193,629 2,241 8,827 7,038 14,982 1,422,828 364,000 - 1,786,828 845,043 216,029 46,323 37,206 30,411 47,453 42,519 10,592 53,505 19,411 7,952 5,446 155,672 18,336 31,493 58,497 2,255 17,829 - 8,468 -I 1,654,440 TO -DATE TOTAL 1 BUDGET BUDGET 1 VARIANCE VARIANCE 1 I I I 1 4,753 10 7.6%1 36,087 10 1 0 IO 0.0%1 18,333 0 1 3,832 I0 21.7%1 12,665 10 1 4,03710 19.0951 14,63710 1 2,467 IO 100.0951 3,70010 1 6,667 IO 100.0951 10,00010 1 (8,483)IQ -18.8951 14,08310 1 321 IO 32.1951 82110 1 [27,508}10 -4.7%1 264,15810 1 14,04310 31.4%1 36,37610 1 18,33210 11.7951 96,85810 1 (430}14 -25.8%1 40310 1 (9,893}1Q -197.9%1 (7,393)10 1 6,18710 63.5%1 11,060 Is 1 1,333 Q 100.0%1 2,000 10 r 15,6571 r 513,7901 1 62,00010 25.0%1 186,00010 I - I I - I I 77,657 I 1 599,790 1 I I I 1 (17,855}1 _i -3.1%1 272,975 10 1 11,23410 7.0%1 92,01910 1 4,56810 13.4951 21,61810 1 {4,714}10 -35.4951 1,953 10 1 8,17510 572%1 15,32510 1 279 IQ 0.9%1 15,94510 1 7,74114 382%1 17,87410 1 10,890 IQ 59.4%1 20,05610 1 (2,318)1-- -6.1%1 16,59810 1 (545)10 -27.2%1 455 10 1 1,73310 100.0%1 2,60010 1 3,13310 74.6%1 5,23310 1 2,737 IQ 2.3%1 61,07010 1 1,066 IQ 10.3%1 6,23110 1 [44,388}10 -226.5%1 (34,588)10 1 90,89510 77.2%1 149,72910 1 2,47810 97.8%1 3,74510 1 209 IO 1.6%1 6,87610 1 {90,178}10 -287.8%1 {74,512}10 1 (2,459)IQ -91.9%1 {1,121}10 -I I - I 1 (17,319)1 1 6w,0811 5.195 0.0% 14.595 12.7% 66.7% 66.7% -12.5% 21.4% -3.1% 21.0% 7.8% -17.2% -131.9% 42.3% 66.7% 16.7% -2% 5% 995 -24% 38% 1% 25% 40% 4% -10% 67% 50% 2% 7% -151% 51% 65% 1% -192% -61% Greater than 1096 positive variance Less than 10% variance Greater than 10% negative variance O 10 CIOF Motiicdo�I COUNCIL CONNECTION SEPTEMBER 25, 2017 PARKS DEPARTMENT Staff is working on the following tasks: • Chipping requests. • Cemetery; selling and locating graves. • Locating Riverside grave lot pins. • Equipment/vehicle repairs. • Park rental setups. • Routine building maintenance. • Fertilizing/aerating. • Mower maintenance. Updates: Sunset Ponds: Basketball court base for asphalt is in waiting on Street Department for assistance. Montiview Park: First single track section is now complete. Rolling Woods: Staff is in renovation process for park rehab. BCOL: New park kiosk installed. Athletic groups: All fall sports are in swing. Cedar Street: Staff installed irrigation system for new planter on Cedar Street. STREET DEPARTMENT Shop: The shop has been busy doing normal maintenance on equipment and vehicles with other repairs as listed: • Repairing the AC on 721 Case loader. Council Connection — 09/25/17 • Replaced gutter brooms unit 132 & 108 Streets: • Sign maintenance • Boulevard tree trimming in various areas. • Fall sweeping is underway • Placed drain tile behind the curb on Gatewater Dr. • Installed irrigation for trees and flower pots on the Cedar St median project • Blacktop patching in various areas Stormwater • We have been doing maintenance in some of our stormwater ponds WATER & SEWER DEPARTMENT Staff is working on the following tasks: • Inspecting, cleaning and televising storm water main lines and catch basin laterals in Northeast Quadrant. • Painting lift station control panels and generators. • Just finished up installing separate electric service to Well #2 and everything is working well. • Just finished up installing new 12" water main down Hart Boulevard in front of the WWTP. By removing the old 6" water main it removed the bottleneck between the 12" water main. • Oct 1St reading water meters. (In September, we read 4,420 accounts) • Oct 2nd working on high and low water accounts / replacing stuck water meters. • Oct 2nd start flushing water mains, taking 2.5 weeks to complete using 2 men. • Oct 10th start cleaning, inspecting, calibrating, and maintenance on all sanitary sewer lift stations including pumps, controls, and generators. • In October we start shutting off 38 private lawn irrigation systems and 24 City irrigation systems. LoC Rl TGE G 1T ..4 � L NEN www.lork[aW.rom MINNEAPOLIS Suite 2200 100 Washington Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55401-2179 T 612.339.6900 F 612-339-0981 WASHINGTON, D.C. Suite 210 415 Second Street, N.E. Washington, D.C. 20002-4900 T 202.544.9840 MEMORANDUM TO: I-94 West Corridor Coalition FR: Dennis McGrann // Andy Burmeister // Lianne Endo // Vince Spinner DT: September 15, 2017 RE: Washington, D.C. Meeting Summary On behalf of the Lockridge Grindal Nauen Federal Relations group, we would like to thank Members of the I-94 West Corridor Coalition for taking the time to visit Washington, D.C. to meet with Members of the Minnesota Congressional Delegation and the Federal Highway Administration. Your visits to Washington were well received and we firmly believe your efforts to describe past successes, next steps, and upcoming milestones will go a long way as this project continues to advance towards the construction of Phase II, the completion of the 610 project, and the Brockton Interchange. The following memorandum provides a brief overview of the discussions had on Capitol Hill, the Commitments made, and some of the more immediate follow up steps that we recommend. MEETING ATTENDEES: Steve Bot Kevin Kasel Keith Wettschreck Adam Nafstad Jillian Hendrickson Rob Olson DJ Hartley Dave Hanson Charlotte Gabler Heidi Nelson Judy Hanson Coalition Chair, I-94 Corridor; Administrator, St. Michael Mayor, St. Michael Councilmember, St. Michael Coalition Vice Chair, I-94 Corridor; Administrator, Albertville Mayor, Albertville Councilmember, Albertville Chamber President, I-94 Corridor CFO, Clam Corporation Councilmember, Monticello Administrator, Maple Grove Councilmember, Maple Grove MEETINGS AGENDA: While each meeting had a very distinct tone and nature which reflected the audience's interests, involvement to date, and desired future involvement, Members of the Coalition and the LGN Federal Relations team worked to come up with an effective, efficient and focused agenda to help guide the discussions. With this in mind, the following general meeting was utilized and adjusted throughout the day as necessary. I. Thank you for past efforts to support I-94 West expansion efforts II. The project has passed a number of significant milestones and continues to progress III. Background on the I-94 West Corridor Coalition IV. Introduction of Coalition Members in the room V. Review of past milestones (Phase I, Corridors of Commerce, 610, Brockton, "Shovel Ready" Recommendation to the Federal Highway Administration) VI. Overview of transportation and economic benefits VII. Discussion about next steps (Corridors of Commerce, TED Grant, Highway Freight Corridor Grant, Federal TIGER Grant, Federal INFRA Grant) VIII. Thanks for the time and continued support MEETINGS: I-94 West Corridor Coalition began their visit to Washington with a pre -meeting strategy session aimed at ensuring the efficient and effective movement of the group on Capitol Hill, and to discuss strategies and agenda outlines for each of the meetings with Members of the Minnesota Congressional Delegation and the U.S. Department of Transportation's Federal Highway Administration. In addition, the group discussed the current status of federal transportation funding, the current legislative and regulatory agendas in Washington D.C, state funding opportunities and outlook, and the outlook for Departments, Agencies, and programs which are and will continue to be of importance to the advancement of the expansion efforts along the I-94 West Corridor. The group met with a number of staff from various offices located in the U.S. Department of Transportation including Members of the Intergovernmental Relations team, the Federal Highway Administration, and key staff overseeing the Federal TIGER and INFRA Grant programs (additional information about these federal discretionary grant programs are located in the meeting preparation packet). The meeting focused on a discussion around the two discretionary grant programs and provided a number of important pieces of information including the Department's efforts to shift the criteria of the previous FASTLANE program to the newly named and changed INFRA program. Importantly, these new criteria should be considered as applications are provided to the Department. The group met with U.S. Senator Amy Klobuchar (D -MN), U.S. Senator Al Franken (D - MN), Congressman Tom Emmer (R -MN -06), Congressman Rick Nolan (D -MN -08), and due to the Congressional schedule a staff member from the office of Congressman Erik Paulsen (R -MN -03) Congressman Jason Lewis (R -MN -02). While not directly representing the corridor, the group met with both of Minnesota's Member's offices who sit on the U.S. House of Representatives Transportation and Infrastructure Committee (Nolan, Lewis). The meetings provided an opportunity for the group to thank those who have been supporters and champions for the project over the years, and to discuss past successes and the upcoming milestones that need to be accomplished to advance the project into the next phases. The discussions provided significant opportunities to discuss the status of Congress, the Administration, and how each of these factors impact the future success of the project. Of specific note, the group focused on the development of the Phase II project lanes and interchange (Albertville) project, the 610 completion project (lanes, interchanges in the Maple Grove region), and the Brockton Interchange (Dayton, Maple Grove, Rogers). There are pictures attached below. CONCLUSION: Once again, congratulations on your successful visits, and your continued progress on the development of the I-94 West Corridor. We are proud to be a part of your team — please do not hesitate to contact Dennis McGrann at 202-669-4591, or Andy Burmeister at 202-713-0895 if you have any questions, or need additional information. 0 �q '00 �I r 4f !0 .�'M�Q- a 1 ; bl; w a 7 �1w1 �Ff ft im-im 9- 777�0-� - - T IL CITY OF ANNANDALE Trial Balance Page. 1 GL Period 08/17 Sep 11, 2017 03 27PM WRIGHT COUNTY AREA TRANSPORTAT Report Criteria: Actual Amounts All Accounts Include FUNDS: 705 Page and Total by FUND All Segments Tested for Total Breaks Account Debit Credit Number Title Amount Amount 705-00000 WCAT 00 705-10101 CASH ACCOUNT (BANK) 6,750.02 705-11500 ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE .00 705-13800 INTEREST RECEIVABLE 00 705-20200 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 00 705-20211 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE ALLOCATION 00 705-27200 RETAINED EARNINGS --UNRESERVED 12,66363- 705-28000 NET ASSETS .00 705-36210-000 INTEREST REVENUE 4 19- 705-38011-000 INITIAL FEE REVENUE .00 705-38012-000 SERVICE REVENUE 82,384 10- 705-49804-304 LEGAL FEES 2,561.40 705-49804-307 SERVICE FEE 85,73050 705-49804-312 CONSULTING FEES 00 705-49804-437 MISCELLANEOUS 1000 Total WRIGHT COUNTYAREA TRANSPORTAT 95,05192 95,051.92 - Grand Totals 95,051 92 95,051.92- CITY OF ANNANDALE DETAIL REVENUES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET FOR THE 8 MONTHS ENDING AUGUST 31, 2017 FUND 705 - WRIGHT COUNTY AREA TRANSPORTAT PERIOD BUDGET %OF ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL AMOUNT VARIANCE BUDGET SOURCE36 705-36210-000 INTEREST REVENUE .85 419 .00 4.19 .00 TOTAL SOURCE 36 85 4.19 00 4.19 00 SOURCE38 705-38011-000 INITIAL FEE REVENUE .00 .00 00 .00 .00 705-38012-000 SERVICE REVENUE 82,38410 82,384.10 .00 82,384.10 .00 TOTAL SOURCE 38 82,384.10 82,38410 00 82,38410 00 TOTAL FUND REVENUE 82,38495 82,38829 .00 82,38829 00 FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY 67 % THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED 09/11/2017 03 27PM PAGE 1 CITY OF ANNANDALE DETAIL EXPENDITURES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET FOR THE 8 MONTHS ENDING AUGUST 31, 2017 FUND 705 - WRIGHT COUNTY AREA TRANSPORTAT DEPARTMENT 498 705-49804-304 LEGAL FEES 705-49804-307 SERVICE FEE 705-49804-312 CONSULTING FEES 705-49804-437 MISCELLANEOUS TOTAL DEPARTMENT 498 PERIOD BUDGET ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL AMOUNT %OF BUDGET .00 2,56140 00 ( 2,561.40) 88,301 90) 00 85,73050 85,73050 00 ( 85,730.50) 5,91361) 00 00 00 .00 .00 .00 1000 1000 .00 ( 10 00) .00 85,740.50 88,301.90 00 ( 88,301.90) 00 TOTAL FUND EXPENDITURES 85,740.50 88,301 90 .00 ( 88,301 90) .00 NET REVENUES OVER EXPENDITURES ( 3,35555) ( 5,913.61) 00 ( 5,91361) 00 FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY 67 % THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED 09/11/2017 03 27PM PAGE 2 Tyrone Land Management Matt McFarlane and Chris Berglund jo Xce1 Energy Unique Property Features 4p00 AG / 1h Qn hC; -tv 12N V DUNNVILLE WILDLIFE AREA 1 Canoe landing & Scenic Overfook Jack Prnw aarlNns RestonsttonA Floodplain Savanna Restoration Sand Blow Prairie Restoration State Endangv;ed PUnt/Goat Prairie Restoration. UakSavanna RtrStOrar fJn� 0 025 05 tMdux Oak Savanna Tree Planting & Birding location Oak Savanna Restoration Site LD 0-% &-e% D I)ak Sava*.nl Reltylta- 1 %1 Sand Barrens Restoration Goat Prairie + ocl, Pine martens Restoration Actions: 2009 - 2017 • Management philosophy —Balance of agriculture, forestry, wildlife habtat and recreation o conservation partners —Beaver creek Reserve —Lower cls ppewa River AHance — U -Stout, UW -Eau claire _Private forester and logger Xce►Energy° Dry Sand Prairie Restoration Goat Prairie Restoration Event Actions: 2009 - 2017 o DNR prescribed burning program o Grassland bird surveys • Timber harvests • Earth ®ay events Grassland Bird Survevs Osorev Platform — Earth Dav jo XceffimrW Prescribed Burn — Sand Barrens Oak Savanna Restoration E }t . 4 L7 i' i T a A • ,, ` t� .' AfY ♦sem', ,�. K�r4 +ft,3� ;�`:,y .._ ��. ,%, a�.� �', ��rr ��'iJ ' � �_� :r' i .gal.`.. / �• 1��- ` je -ILA IF • � �.! � ) .��' ill 'gyp; _ L �' i + tet. TimberFA 05 Xcel EA Xcel Energy for Wildlife 1 r s . fig rl y aara• _� 5 - i� �""r�ti`--�` t• •' . •*-sus t .��, � -�„> _. t' �...::.i,•�' l 7Pr�l kaky 0 Al .� Isq.� ", . - u t f , tib►,. - All �fi,.� �'� �.f}`, S - �}�'�' fir. X. v 4 ' F ,- � _ . �'• ';�, ' S.0 '�,.; 6''&",.. #,,;,. � � yp• _ E .SFA it. . ��• 1 1t'.. *� ��. r _ rR..e • •ll 2015 Oak Sava nna Restoration l- �l s a •;tet j+ + f , �� ., ' ' `, '� �` � • _ � i'y:%�•Y '!' �•:t +_. �.� .i#,-l�rf'�. i , -'�� a:�,j+ _`, r �� ', ^�' ` ',�' ��! !_! ,•'1. � •` !_ •� `'r ., fes' �{�,�r.�., � +,i .at •� ^� - - rf a• !, ti. 31:x. �% � i' . �+ - 1 � ;- I•r:''r'. ..:.•! �C�r:. a 2012 Conservation Award Fri 4, May ip 20t2 7 Xce/Energy- Sherco & Monticello Oak Savanna Restoration Opportunities jo Xcel Energy 12 74 y u 1A9 92 -,c Oak Sav, O 12Itn-St 'E -,I- v o• V o n c.o� ii c t err• -Ac (t*a k rvest + Restoration) C --'c (Oak Savanna Harvest + Restoration) El D r `D r + z: m r { rn 21 Ac Oak Savan•na-Harvest + Restoration Preliminary Schedule LXwIEnergy Spring 2017 —Determine potential timber harvest areas (complete) —Zoning along Mississippi River (comps ete) —Review with potential loggers (complete) —Approval from Sherco and Monticello leadership ---Obtain bids and assign contract with, logger (contract pending) Fall/Winter 2017 Begin marking trees within the harvest boundaries (50% complete) Meld meeting with Great Giver Greening, NWITlj, U of M and other conservation partners Fall/Winter 2017 � cia � !f•"n�l�� t�`'; �R..TSf ��'�,. <.� Vii` J�.��' •V �� ..f y1 ��i�` +~. �- ��.. fj ail � ,;"�, :��. �.,�• s , w .i. �t. 1 fi .S. �"r�'NtiL��% rit1.4, x'\71 s'�� a- ,•!. �'j as !i r< ;i• r jo Xce/Energy- INV, 41k X4 Wov iN 7.� 4t 71 AN; N e} f � � �M i`. M �� >� . t�, �� t . t,'� a r 'AT 4w PP -.4 v -k' ?Y4 ".7 .'Ora Pjo 640 1iYj` d ' ', , 1`'1' 4 nI' ieC Iti. ^, i ;t'.''.'. NX ji 11, kt. -tot, i A, IL I I& viti llj� -y71- .� - _ �'"'• _. _. -,�, � 3 ' � "� �a' ` ;t t ' � j fit?' � ' . ' ' -.:..ate" �. "!j, a r„ F r �.. � Z rer�� - a. �j.t �. � sr •;: c.., ',,,, i w ..� .*z �t rye - `""�• _ .,� �s� . r r ;yr i � 1 • +' .� �,• ..ms�sr rk .� ._ �� '�" i !3'+}1✓.'..� fr 5.'�� ,fix...` Y 14 �` � a .. S�• � 14'. a _ ylhi r rid..?, •c c I'i ;Y. • _ r - +) •- .•'. X. �'i7� fit` •Y..�F. f .. - js•— c,_- �� '► i �^'►: 'jam•,,' - � P r�' �� '�. _ .a�te1.. ; � �-,,/; •• ,. �. :!�' . �`• � .�3 s .}� '``` � 1�►, ' 111 _ ! l i'lt: •, r t ef' r� ftj' / 1 � t% .% • f "ra"AE .Y. � E .\ �,i"? ;' ._ `, � ' ate. r , !�� :_ 1�► �� f �; p � 511PI �f ? '�� Y•.i� � �,'i �r� • t � � lid e , . "4 a C V , ICA il f i IA PV 14 .h a �' -.r ....� / ':� .tea �a� 1L �_\?Z. "'�� 1'y �.�'�^"7►stj:'+Q i�1e'�.1u{�� } �-• =s� 41 .r f .� ♦ -or .� 7 .5 -�. I. N - l ►-� � t +'` � u � :•�' }L� _1J r-ci : j `.�-•,p-J': R' 1_.Y �� I,�/.� ��.... �. a:� y 1, , t � �. w .,C Leave Trees '� .r w. ,f .,yY k_ t ti;. ,zi '..a1 t+=.. i t fir, o- 3 �iy�•:'Y; }N',Er's7 •.aw�•'ti.: Vim.._ 'i `a - . w `." 4 `>,,, ;,,,. '„ -'•'F„ • -.'�1 r�,•y� 'c.''M �,7 �.+` 7':'..r. •h'ar4j�.', art 1. � c ` � � i + r �'ti� y t;: �; ` ► � '�''�''`i•, ;� r ' �` r, �64M� � ' ��` -� '" - &� ' : ' `gid ti .'�`}•� + �� P.16 .h a �' -.r ....� / ':� .tea �a� 1L �_\?Z. "'�� 1'y �.�'�^"7►stj:'+Q i�1e'�.1u{�� } �-• =s� 41 .r f .� ♦ -or .� 7 .5 -�. I. N - l ►-� � t +'` � u � :•�' }L� _1J r-ci : j `.�-•,p-J': R' 1_.Y �� I,�/.� ��.... �. a:� y 1, , t � �. w .,C Leave Trees '� .r w. ,f .,yY k_ t ti;. ,zi '..a1 t+=.. i t fir, o- 3 �iy�•:'Y; }N',Er's7 •.aw�•'ti.: Vim.._ 'i `a - . w `." 4 `>,,, ;,,,. '„ -'•'F„ • -.'�1 r�,•y� 'c.''M �,7 �.+` 7':'..r. •h'ar4j�.', art 1. � c RL tA" Jil�4' I'll Af V p, 1k xiA A-V 19 OA t. A j A Vi "'ON• u a v vs N A Z 0 FAUN', MAN MW Ag p o oto p u A, 17211 VA. � . '� �� I ` ; �• :� .4j, i? .n� ,•4 '�`� yy� Iy�/� r�C �riFf�7.•Sp��r;*�1•!,' (� 4 le xv, Ail ;row Wf r ��' a`.+J a } � �z (�,aSR��%•... •..��'+ �* a . , � �� R� et��(!}' 1 � TTT++�'" a� ; �. `. gv Py AIM • ripa ia bu n 1- 410 Sherco & Monticello Additional Projects 25 jo Xcel Energy MceiEnergys Sherco Spring/Summer 2017 Relocation of the U of IVPs Sand Plains Research Farm Option agreement with Northern Metals on a 50 acre +/® to for the relocation of their facility Talks with other investors about potential sales on other available Xcel properties Ball 2018 Begin renegotiations with farmers on existing leases to get rental rates at current market values Monticello Winter/Spring 2018 Conversion of 20.8 acres parcel near the entrance of the plant to a native prairie. This project is part of a partnership with Wright County Soil and The City of Monticello •T [{ C ate""`►' K !-` � re t _ `"t lip Questios �Y y ) A K