The URL can be used to link to this page

City Council Agenda Packet 07-22-2002AGENDA REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, July 22, 2002 - 7 p.m. Mayor: Roger Belsaas Council Members: Roger Carlson, Clint Herbst, Brian Stumpf and Bruce Thielen 1. Call to Order and Pledge of Allegiance. 2.A. Approve minutes of July 8, 2002 regular Council meeting. B. Approve minutes of July 8, 2002 workshop meeting. 3. Consideration of adding items to the agenda. i owwol - r r 5 to (o,� �Jf 4 e, Ou N i 4. itizen Imments/petitions, request and complaints. f S S(l t 5. Consenft agenda. `'• g A. Consideration of ratifying new hires. B. Consideration of appointment of election judges for 2002 primary election. C. Consideration of request for approval of an off-site storage facility - Walt's Pawn & Gun. Consideration of establishing a hearing date for an ordinance allowing Sunday license holders 915�,SS to sell liquor for on site consumption prior to noon on Sundays. E. Consideration of final plat and development areement for the Morning Glory PUD/Resident- ial subdivision. F. Consideration of concept and development stage planned unit development and preliminary plat for Autumn Ridge. Applicant: Shawn Weinand. G. Consideration of approving cooperative agreement with Wright County for reconstruction of CSAH 75 from Washington Street to Otter Creek, Project No. 2000-16C. 6. Consideration of items removed from the consent agenda for discussion. 7. Assessment Hearing for Gillard Avenue Pathway and consideration of award of contract for Gillard Avenue Improvement Project No. 2001-10C. 8. Assessment Hearing for Delinquent Utilities and consideration of certifying delinquent accounts to the County. 9. Consideration of accepting bids and awarding the contract for the Front Street Improvement Project No. 2001-06C. oval all°wing fat app da ouncil d preliminary p P ax�nersl11p • Age ticellO City C evelopn1ent annesotaRousing City Mon 222042 fanned unit d _Central Min vices for the July Two o meat stage a R District Ovide legal ser ageel p r • deYation ° f de idential units iii lecting �irin to p 10 con Ingle family res r°cedure for se 11 s °� establishing p nsideiation f 11 C° f bills for 3Ltily . Ment o 12. Approve pay Add°urn 1�• MINUTES REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday July 8, 2002 - 7 p.m. Members Present: Roger Belsaas, Roger Carlson, Clint Herbst, Brian Stumpf and Bruce Thielen. Members Absent: None 1. Call to order and Pledge of Allegiance. Mayor Belsaas called the meeting to order at 7 p.m. and declared a quorum present. The Pledge of Allegiance was said. 2. Approve minutes of June 24, 2002 Regular Council Meeting, BRIAN STUMPF MOVED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE JUNE 24, 2002 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING. CLINT HERBST SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 3. Consideration of adding items to the agenda. Clint Herbst stated he had received a call from a resident asking about placing signs stating it is the law that motorists have to stop for pedestrians in a marked crosswalk. Public Works Director, John Simola responded that he had also talked to that resident and explained to him the existing sign regulations but indicated that he would check into the particular sign the resident was talking about and report back. 4. Citizens comments/petitions, requests, and complaints. None. 5. Consent Agenda. A. Consideration of ratifying new hires for the Community Center, streets and parks department. Recommendation: Ratify the new hires as identified. B. Consideration of a conditional use permit allowing accessory space in excess of 1200 sq. ft. in the R-1 District. Applicant: Lynn & Christine Anderson. Recommendation: Move to approve a conditional use permit allowing construction of the accessory structure in excess of 10% of the rear yard and allowing the combined detached and attached accessory structure area to be greater than that of the principle use and in excess of 1200 sq. ft with the following conditions based on the finding that the accessory structure will improve the �A Council Minutes - 7/8/02 appearance of the neighborhood and will not have an adverse affect on the surrounding properties. l . Accessory building space is to be utilized solely for the storage of residential personal property of the occupant of the principal dwelling and no accessory building space is to be utilized for commercial purposes. 2. The parcel on which the accessory building is to be located is of sufficient size such that the building will not crowd the open space on the lot. 3. The accessory building will not be so large as to have an adverse effect on the architectural character or reasonable residential use of the surrounding property. 4. The accessory buildings shall be constructed to be similar to the principal building in architectural style and building materials. 5. The proposed accessory structure shall be used for storage of seasonal vehicles only. There shall be no vehicles parked in front of the accessory structure or along the rear yard which would give the appearance of an everyday garage and driveway. 6. Confirmation that the applicant can do what is shown on the site plan via a survey or staking the plan and getting the approval of the zoning official. C. Consideration of approval of request for charitable gambling license - St. Henry's Fall Festival. Recommendation: Adopt a resolution authorizing the State Gambling Control Board to issue the exempt charitable gambling license to St. Henry's Church for September 14"' and 15"'. Res. No. 2002-40. D. Consideration of development stage planned unit development allowing a mixed residential and institutional use in the R-2 District including use of church building for church purposes and conversion of former parish center into combination church offices and rental housing. Applicant: Hope Evangelical Free Church and the Church of St. Henry. Recommendation: Move to approve the development stage PUD allowing a mixed residential and institutional use in the R-2 district. Request include the church building to be allowed for church uses and the parish center converted into a combination of office and residential use. Development stage PUD subject to the requirement that interior lot lines be eliminated and subject to requirement that existing landscaping be trimmed and weeded, dead brush and branches removed and replaced. E. Consideration of approving revisions to current Drug and Alcohol Testing Policy for Heartland Express. Recommendation: Moved to adopt the resolution approving the changes made to the Monticello/Heartland Express Drug and Alcohol Policy reflecting the revisions made by the Federal Transit Administration. Res. No. 2002-41 2 A Council Minutes - 7/8/02 F. Consideration of proposal from Xcel Energy for replacing the 1960 Cobrahead lighting on Broadway and installation of the new acorn lighting on the medians on the reconstruction of County Road 75. Recommendation: Move to accept proposal #I from Xcel Energy to replace the cobrahead lighting with the new group V lighting for a cost of $109,700, to include accepting Xcel Energy's second proposal for the ornamental lighting in the medians with the construction of County Road 75 at a cost of $82,500 making a total cost of $192,200. Acceptance of these proposals is contingent upon the City moving forward with the County Road 75 project. G. Consideration of approval of temporary on -sale liquor license for St. Henry's Fall Festival. Recommendation: Approve the issuance of a temporary on -sale liquor license to the Church of St. Henry's for their Fall Festival on September 14"' and 15"'. H. Consideration of a request to grant preliminary plat approval and a request for rezoning from A -O to B-3. Applicant: Prairie Ponds, LLC. Recommendation: Move to approve the preliminary plat with staff recommendations as follows and to include provisions for connecting road to Groveland pending approval from City Engineer and Parks Commission. 1. A detailed landscaping plan must be provided showing a buffer yard between area adjacent to all residential districts. 2. The grading, utilities, and drainage plan are subject to the review of the City Engineer. I Access off of Wolters Way must frilly align with the access to School Boulevard to the south. 4. A lighting plan must be provided that meet City Code guidelines. 5. Easement issues are subject to the review of City Staff. 6. Further recommendations by City Staff. Move to approve rezoning from A -O to B-3 based on the finding that the proposed use is consistent with the comprehensive plan. Ord. Amd. 4380 Brian Stumpf questioned who requested the change in orientation of the road. Jeff O'Neill replied that it was a requirement of the Planning Commission because the road didn't align fully with School Boulevard. BRIAN STUMPF MOVED TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA WITH A CONTINGENCY ON #5H THAT APPROVAL WAS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY CITY ENGINEER AND CITY STAFF. BRUCE THIELEN SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. dA Council Minutes - 7/8/02 6. Consideration of items removed from the consent agenda for discussion. None. 7. Consideration of accepting the 2001 audit report. Rick Borden from Gruys Borden Carlson was present to review with the Council the audit report for the year ending December 31, 2001. The general fund revenue budget was $4.1 million and actual revenue collected was $4.8 million. The general fund budget for expenditures was $4.1 million and $4.5 million was expended. He pointed out that the dollar reserves in the special funds can only be used for the purposes that the special fund was established for. Most of the City's fund balances are designated for a specific use. He noted a deficit in the park fund and explained that the expenditures were budgeted in the capital outlay fiend but coded to the park fund. He also noted that in Public Works Engineering fund there is preliminary project costs which will go to the construction fund once that project is set up. Rick Borden briefly covered the debt service funds and the proprietary funds and indicated that they were in good shape. He did recommend that the liquor store financial statements be done in a more timely fashion. Mr. Borden also explained the items that were covered in the legal compliance letter which included compliance with regulations relating to contracts, bidding, investments and public indebtedness. Overall the City is in good financial shape according to the audit findings. The auditor will be sending a copy of the audit report to the state. ROGER CARLSON MOVED TO ACCEPT THE AUDIT REPORT FOR 2001. BRUCE THIELEN SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 8. Consideration of setting a date for assessment hearing on Gillard Avenue Pathway and consideration of acceptance of bids for pathwav work. Clint Herbst asked if the assessment hearing date could be changed since he would not be present at the next meeting. After discussion it was determined to hold the assessment hearing at the July 22nd meeting. City Engineer, Bret Weiss, stated that $5,200 would be the estimated assessment per parcel if the City assessed 100% of the cost. Although it was discussed when the public hearing on the project was conducted, no decision had been made on the amount of City participation in the project costs. It was noted that this trail segment is not on the City's grid system. John Simola stated the City's grid system deals with sidewalks not pathway. For sidewalks in the grid system the City would pay 75%. Clint Herbst asked if the City had any other similar situations where a pathway was installed after the development took place. Staff indicated that most of the pathways were constructed as part of development. The Council discussed a 50%-50% policy with 50% being assessed and 50% picked up the City. City Administrator, Rick Wolfsteller asked how the Council intended to fund the City's share of the cost. The Council indicated that it would come from the park/pathway dedication fiends. ►I A Council Minutes - 7/8/02 The maintenance of the pathway was discussed. Brian Stumpf stated that is should be made clear to property owner that the City would not be clearing snow off the pathway. Jeff O'Neill felt that the pathway should be cleared because it serves as a sidewalk and that the property owners should be responsible for doing that. BRIAN STUMPF MOVED TO ASSESS 25% OF THE PROJECT COST FOR THE GILLARD AVENUE PATHWAY TO THE ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNERS WITH THE CLEARING OF THE PATHWAY TO BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PROPERTY OWNERS AND TO SET AN ASSESSMENT HEARING FOR JULY 22, 2002. In further discussion, Bret Weiss stated that one comment the Council will hear at the assessment hearing relates to concern about the amount of traffic generated by the proposed Bruggeman development and the capability of Gillard Avenue to handle the increase in traffic. Clint Herbst felt that as development pressure in that area continues the City would be wise to look at another outlet besides Gillard Avenue. Bret Weiss stated that since half of the roadway is in the township it makes any decision affecting Gillard Avenue a little more complicated. ROGER CARLSON SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Res. No. 2002-39. 8A. Consideration of resolution acceptinLy quotes and awardinLy contract for construction of the Locust, Walnut and Cedar Street Parking Lot Improvements, Proiect No. 2002-07C. The City had received two quotes for construction of parking stalls at three locations: 1) Cedar Street - The location of the former Senior Citizens Center; 2) Locust Street - In the area of the China Buffet and Walnut Street in the area of Sunny Fresh. The price range quoted was from $38,534 to $62,232.26 with Buffalo Bituminous submitting the low quote. A revised plan was developed which would allow the construction of three additional stalls on Cedar Street. If the Council authorized the additional stalls, it would add approximately $3,600 to the bid price. Clint Herbst asked about funding for this work. Some of the cost will be assessed. CLINT HERBST MOVED TO AWARD THE WORK TO BUFFALO BITUMINOUS IN THE AMOUNT OF $38,534.00 FOR THE LOCUST, WALNUT AND CEDAR STREET PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENTS, PROJECT NO. 2002-07C AND AUTHORIZING THE ADDITIONAL $3,600 EXPENDITURE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THREE ADDITIONAL STALLS. BRUCE THIELEN SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 9. Approve vavment of bills for Julv. ROGER CARLSON MOVED TO APPROVE PAYMENT OF BILLS FOR JULY. CLINT HERBST SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 5 Mm Council Minutes - 7/8/02 10. Adiourn. Meeting was adjourned at 8 p.m. Recording Secretary MINUTES SPECIAL MEETING - MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, July 8, 2002 - 5:30 p.m. Members Present: Roger Belsaas, Roger Carlson, Clint Herbst, Brian Stumpf and Bruce Thielen. Members Absent: None. 1. Call the meeting to order. Mayor Belsaas called the meeting to order at 5:35 p.m. 2. Ice Arena/Community Recreation Complex Proposal. Jeff O'Neill provided some background on the proposal to construct an ice arena at the 7"' Street location. In a previous meeting, the Council was asked to consider the donation and/or lease of the land and would upon submittal of financial information give consideration to the waiving or reduction of development fees. At that time the proposal by the group was that the facility would be owned and operated by a non-profit corporation. Since that meeting there have been changes to the proposal and representatives from the various groups involved were present to explain the new proposal. Al Gagnon from the Pointe Group stated that initially just a single ice sheet was proposed and it has since developed into much more. The group had just begun the fund raising to get the project started and had contacted Silver Creek Development. Silver Creek Development expressed an interest in the facility and became involved in the proposal as did the Monticello Youth Hockey Association and the Monticello Youth Soccer Association. The proposal now includes two ice sheets, a domed soccer field, related facilities such as locker rooms, concessions, restrooms, parking and also a retail development. Chuck Freiberg presented some preliminary sketches showing the proposed layout. Silver Creek would be involved in the construction of the recreational facility and would develop the retail portion of the proposal. Brian Stumpf asked if the parcel was fully utilized whether there would be sufficient parking area. Chuck Freiberg stated that parking spaces were laid out based on the retail use and not the recreational use. He indicated that there would be cross easements between the recreational and commercial use for parking. They did not expect that parking would be fully utilized except possibly when tournaments were held. It was estimated that construction costs could run between $100-$110 per square foot. Amenities could add to the square foot cost. Estimated schedule for the project would be 6-10 months. Todd Banek and Gregg Engle, representing Monticello Youth Hockey, spoke to the Council for the need for the facility. They noted they are 60 hours short of the ice time needed this year and there is no time available at any area facilities. The Hockey Association stated they are committed to fund- raising a considerable amount for this project. They felt not only the ice facility was needed but also Z ►3 Special Council Meeting Minutes - 7/8/02 that the commercial development would bring notoriety to the City bringing in people who would be spending time and money in the city. Todd Banek emphasized the need for the City's help in getting this project done. With the five entities involved they felt there was a good base for making this development happen. Gregg Engle added that the Hockey Association is in their 26" year of existence and emphasized repeatedly the need for more ice time for the hockey participants. He felt this proposal was a good venture between private and public entities. Kent Johnson from Monticello Youth Soccer spoke about providing a facility for the 700 youth involved in the soccer program. There is an indoor and outdoor soccer season. Most of the domed facilities, however are in the metropolitan area. For the Soccer Association there were two key concerns: 1) Competitive fee for use of the facility - the fee must be low enough for the existing clubs to handle. 2) It must be a full sized facility. The Monticello Youth Soccer Association was looking at a 20 year lease. He emphasized that the City's participation would help keep the fee competitive so that the Association could afford to lease the number of hours needed. They did not want a pared down facility and felt that what was proposed would be attractive to other communities. It would also make the City of Monticello more visible and bring in more people. He thought maybe they could work with the Community Center for multiple use of the facility such as indoor walking area. Tentatively it is proposed that the Monticello Youth Hockey Association would be operating the ice facility. Silver Creek would do the construction operating as a bank as far as financing the construction of the facility. The City would not have liability for the operation of the facility. Al Gagnon indicated that Silver Creek Development would own the building and lease it to the group. Pat Cruikshank of Silver Creek Development stated that they have a number of development in the City of Monticello such as the 6t" Street Annex, Towne Centre and a 35 unit apartment complex currently under construction. He noted there is no other project out there like the one being proposed and he looked forward to their partnership with the various groups involved. In discussing development costs, the group indicated that they had talked to Fred Patch and they came up with an estimated $115,000 in development costs. The group was asking that these fees be waived or reduced. In addition they would like a ten year tax abatement on the property. They are also looking at acquiring the entire parcel (approximately 17 acres). The extension of 7`" Street in this area was discussed. Roger Belsaas noted that with the ever increasing traffic on Broadway the need becomes greater to get 7`" Street extended on the west to County Road 39 and on the east to County Road 18. The question was how the City could fund the street extension. The Council pointed out that the City had a considerable amount of money invested in this parcel and there was some reluctance on their part to give the land away, especially for private development. Although the Council had earlier considered donation/lease of the land it was only for the amount of land that would be needed for the ice arena and they were not looking at development of the entire parcel. Recreational complexes like this had been done in other communities such as Plymouth, Champlin, Stillwater and Prior Lake/Savage. Bruce Thielen indicated that while he liked the concept he would be interested in getting information from the other communities on how they put the package 2 23 Special Council Meeting Minutes - 7/8/02 together. He added that the Council has a fiduciary responsibility to the taxpayers and as a result there is a concern with giving property away for commercial development and waiving of fees. Bruce Thielen stated that if the ice arena is put in and at some point no longer used as a recreational facility the City should be compensated. He talked about having a "sunset clause" wherein if the recreational facility operated as such for a given period of time such as 15 years the City would feel that they had been compensated for the land donation. In discussing the commercial area, Pat Cruikshank indicated that they were looking at a restaurant, something like Applebees in their initial concept. Bruce Thielen stated the Council was comfortable with the donation of the land for the recreational use but not with donating land for commercial development. Pat Cruikshank stated the project would not be viable for them without the City giving them the land. The land would solidify the deal for them. He added that they would not be asking for a tax abatement on the commercial portion of the property. The Council discussed whether land should be given away for commercial development. Bruce Thielen stated the Council is trying to arrive at a rationale for what is being done and needs to analyze what benefits would be received for what the City is being asked to give. Brian Stumpf suggested offering the land to the hockey association but that the Council not consider waiving of the development fees or a tax abatement on the parcel. Bruce Thielen felt that should be a time limit that the facility would need to operate as recreational complex and suggested 15 years. In addition, he felt that by donating the land to the hockey association it would give them greater flexibility. It was noted that without the tax abatement, it could mean higher user fees for the hockey association and soccer association. The consensus of the Council was that they were comfortable with the donation of the land to the association but would not consider waiving of fees or a tax abatement. The Council felt this proposal would not unfairly burden the taxpayers. Bruce Thielen said he would like to see some guarantee that local groups would get preference in use of the facility. Rick Wolfsteller stated that the $115,000 in development fees was most likely based on the area for the recreational complex only and that if the full parcel was being donated the fees should be calculated on the full parcel. He suggested that the development fees be rechecked and then the group would have a better idea of the fees involved. It was noted that if the property was utilized for commercial development it would require rezoning. There was a also a question of the amount of stormwater ponding area that would be needed by the City. The proposal that was submitted to the group by the Council was: 1) Donation of the land to the hockey association; 2) No waiving of the development fees; and 3) No tax abatement. The group stated that they would have to do additional study to see if the proposal was still feasible. The meeting was adjourned at 6:35 p.m. Recording Secretary 3 2 !) Council Agenda - 7/22/02 SA. Consideration of approving new hires and departures for the liquor store._ (RW) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The Council is asked to ratify the hiring of new employees that have occurred recently at the liquor store. As you recall, it is recommended that the Council officially ratify the hiring of all new employees including part-time and seasonal workers. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Ratify the hiring of the part-time employees for the liquor store as identified on the attached list. C. SUPPORTING DATA: Lists of new employees. NEW EMPLOYEES Name Title Department Fleck, Daniel Liquor Clerk Liquor Hire Date 7/1/02 TERMINATING EMPLOYEES Name Reason Department Last Day employee council list: 7/18/02 PT Class Class 5A Council Agenda - 7/22/02 5B. Consideration of atmointino, election iudaes for the 2002 election. (R. W) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The 2002 primary election will be held on Tuesday, September 10th, and the general election will be on Tuesday, November 5th. The individuals appointed as election judges would be serving for both the primary and general elections. The attached is a list of names of people who have previously served as election judges in the past or who indicated a willingness to serve as a judge at the caucuses in Wright County. The names on the attached list area pool of individuals that the City can tap for election judges. It should be noted that these individuals can serve only upon completion of election judge training. Training sessions will be scheduled by Wright County over the next month and all appointed judges must complete a training session. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: The only alternative available is to appoint election judges as required by law with the contingency that they complete election judge training. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: None. D. SUPPORTING DATA: List of individuals recommended for appointment as election judges. C/).UU).Cf).coZ.Z' C—_� _ +�000C7C707Q7m-Z C O O O m m O (D (D < 0_ O Cu v C Z7 o O 0- o m m (D 0 �. --� 3 q Q m Z3 -m v m v (D v (n (D v v' W-� 0')-� O Cn Cn O5 � W A (D -� j CO W N O W O W N _a D O (-, P CD N C O -� W� Cn M Cn -W� O— N- p --4 CD G �o �mn�.m�� mm A moo G 0 v (D W (D A cn = (D (D X �� .<� �Q7 (D ��a).�: �� cn � (D o 0 p o 0) (D o v m m ��0 :3 W�0 o� o m NCrm 0 <<. coD m o o o o 0 0 0 cD N cD 0 0 0 2 -�� ° o o(D; o o-Cll o o _0 cn = o o Z ZIn (D-ZCT1(n�0 o ZU,0 �� CJIzZCn ° m �� CD (U'n mZ� cnrno Z mcnu-o (D o C,) W Cn N Cn Z Cn Nc, O N W W CD O ZNN wcnCn0) Z�� NJ ZZ cn Z W N CO W Cn N Z �� Z cn W U, W N ('A Cn (n Z Cnal Cn Cn N N W U, W W 0) N W (nn O O N O W N N N N O N rnrnrnrnrn�rnrnrnrnrnrnrn�rnrnrn....�rn.rn m N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N rn U, (J, Cn Cn Cn Cn Cn CJ, CJ, Cn Cn (On COn COJ, Cn U, Cn CC) CD CD Cri COJ, Cn Cn UO, 6 N (, N N Cn N. I Cb Cn A N N (J7 Cn � O N A N W O co 411.W Cn Co W p --'j CD N O -� �! N Cn Cb O O N Z --A J— W W O�—� W� O O v P O Cn W CO O Cn CO CO O O W N Cn --,I Cn p\) W �I W M p Cb CO Cn Cn CO rn m m IT m (D m m m m (D --4-' m m m m m m m m m cn Cn Cn cn Cn cn Cn Cn Cn Cn (D cn cn Cn Cn cn (n cn cn cn W 4 j W D N O C ;u O -< N m m m m m m m m m (D ;:P m m m m (D m m m CD (D W cn cn cn cn cn cn cn cn cn (D (n (n cn cn cn cn in cn cn cn G) -� M N Z Cil rnCD M o D c r N DD D-mmDD --pDDDD�,-u DD D ch (D m m m m m „ 3 -� 0 0 — — — _ 0 0 3 Council Agenda - 7/22/02 5C. Consideration of request for approval of an off-site storage facility - Walt's Pawn & Gun. (RW) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Section 3-15-19 of the City's ordinance governing pawn shops allows for off site storage of pawned items provided: 1) A written request is submitted; 2) The storage facility be locked and secured; 3) All provision of the ordinance regarding record keeping and reporting apply to the off site facility; 4) Licensee shall permit inspection of the storage facility in accordance with the provisions of the ordinance; 5) The licensee must own the building in which the business is conducted and own any off site storage facility or have a lease that extends for six months; and 6) Property shall be stored in compliance with all provisions of the City code. Randel Thompson who has purchased Walt's Pawn & Gun has submitted a written request to the City requesting off site storage for pawned items. He has indicated in his letter that he has discussed this request with Wright County Officer Paul Johnson. Mr. Johnson indicated that as long as the Sheriff's Department had access to the items, they didn't have a problem with off site storage. Mr. Thompson is requesting that the off site storage be located at his home in Cedar, Minnesota which would impact his ability to meet condition #6 noted above. The provisions of the City of Monticello's ordinance relating to outside storage in residential areas would not apply to property in a different community. There is nothing in our ordinance that states that any off site storage must be located in the same community as the licensed pawn business. If the Council considers approving the request for off site storage it should be contingent upon compliance with the code requirements of the community in which the off site storage facility is located. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Approve the request for off site storage of pawned items for Walt's Pawn & Gun with the contingency that the proposed storage facility meet the code requirements of the community it is located in. 2. Do not approve the request for off site storage of pawned items for Walt's Pawn & Gun. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Most of the provisions of this ordinance are enforced by the Wright County Sheriff's Department and if they are acceptable to the off site storage, the City may see no reason to deny the request. D. SUPPORTING DATA: 0 Request for off site storage Dawn Grossinger 505 Walnut Street Suite 1 Monticello MN 55362 Dear Dawn Grossinger, Thank you for taking time to discuss with me the city rules regarding location of off site storage for pawned items. As we discussed I would like to be approved for storage at my home. This would be for mainly larger items like snowmobiles and trailers etc. The address is: 19458 Taylor St. NE Cedar MN 55011. I have discussed this with Officer Paul Johnson and he indicated that as long as the police had access to the items he was fine with it. Please consider this my formal request for approval for off site storage. If there should be any questions or concerns please feel free to call me at: 763-295-6955 any time from 10AM-6 PM Monday through Friday. Again, thank you for your consideration. C7:__ _____1__ T _ _ 1 1 m1 Council Agenda - 7/22/02 5D. Consideration of establishing a hearing date for an ordinance allowing Sundav liquor license holders to sell liquor for on site consumption prior to noon on Sundays. (RW) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The City currently allows on sale liquor license holders to also serve liquor on Sundays between the hours of noon and one a.m. Monday morning with the addition of a separate Sunday liquor license. The twelve noon starting time is the City's ordinance, but state statutes do allow cities to have an earlier starting time of 10 a.m. on Sundays provided the City holds a public hearing on the ordinance change and that the earlier starting time is in conjunction with the sale of food at the licensed establishment. This issue was discussed by the Council a few years ago at the request of one of the local restaurants, but the Council chose to leave the time at twelve noon. The purpose of this agenda item is to see if the Council would be interested in amending the ordinance to allow Sunday liquor license holders possibly up to two times a year the opportunity to serve liquor earlier than noon for a special event at their establishment. If the Council was interested in modifying the Sunday liquor license rules in this fashion, we would need to schedule a public hearing at the next council meeting before actually adopting any ordinance amendment. A request was recently received by the American Legion Club to be able to serve liquor earlier than noon for a special event that was upcoming in Monticello. Although the ordinance could not be changed in time for this particular situation, the Council may want to consider some flexibility to allow an earlier serving time for special events being held or promoted by a liquor license holder and the Council could limit the number of events to a specific number each year. It would be suggested that the ordinance require Council approval of each special event and it is suggested that two per year should be sufficient for most cases. B. ALTERNATI'VE ACTIONS: 1. Council could set a public hearing date to consider an ordinance amendment allowing for (J amendments to the Sunday liquor license hours of operation. 2. Council could decide not to amend the ordinance. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff feels an ordinance amendment can be easily established that would allow for earlier starting times on occasion for special events. If the Council is willing to consider this type of an amendment, it is recommended that a public hearing be held at the next Council meeting to consider the ordinance amendment. If the Council does not want to change the Sunday liquor hours from the present twelve noon starting time, alternative #2 should be selected. D. SUPP�; RTING DATA: Noiie. City COL1nC11 Agenda - 07/22/02 5E. Consideration of approving the final plat for the Morning Glory Subdivision. (JO) REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND Dale Salo has requested final plat approval for the Morning Glory Subdivision. Development stage PUD and the preliminary plat were approved some time ago, then the project stalled and was sold by Jim Eisle to Salo. This is the project that is located across from the Legion on Elie Street. The City Engineer has reviewed the plans and staff is comfortable with final plat approval. The development agreement is under preparation and will follow the standard format. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS 1. Motion to approve the Morning Glory final plat. Approval contingent on execution of standard development agreement as prepared by City staff. 2. Motion to deny approval of final plat. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends alternative 1. SUPPORTING DATA Copy of final plat. REMOVE CONCRETE 'cLMUVL TREE S I > , ;TYPICAL) / ;' rr Ir 11 ff r r / i l , ! J / iNV-W2. NOT M'S REMOVE REMOVE s if CONCRETE REMOVE CONCRETE — 101 LE REMOVE BITr1MIN0 ' _ US 180 SY 0 20 40 �SCAL.EINFEET �n 0 s� a J� C R! y o o!g 3{ cr 0 a �o N c s C W K cw a� N�Q O ' ¢ 1 N�47N ~WJ� ��yCO F�m<{/1 tNy VE -w �12 s �F oo N O Z U � N y r O m0 `o � ,z�`+ L r♦i l�1 y M N U N (J C X �+ A f-, NN Vi L {L CC 0. 0 0n E � In E y V C 4.J o O co Y �� 4:;:Lu ; W 1-7W � O C W W J -1 -5 L'o W IW 0 o ly CDW � Z Q DY © O LCJ m --EET HUMBER C2.01 ( J 1 LOC f\\ . , / 411-1 "'ei\ \ � fes' /`• 01 Yll \ \ REMOVE FENCE — 220 IF \ \ M1 \ REMOVE CONCRETE 'cLMUVL TREE S I > , ;TYPICAL) / ;' rr Ir 11 ff r r / i l , ! J / iNV-W2. NOT M'S REMOVE REMOVE s if CONCRETE REMOVE CONCRETE — 101 LE REMOVE BITr1MIN0 ' _ US 180 SY 0 20 40 �SCAL.EINFEET �n 0 s� a J� C R! y o o!g 3{ cr 0 a �o N c s C W K cw a� N�Q O ' ¢ 1 N�47N ~WJ� ��yCO F�m<{/1 tNy VE -w �12 s �F oo N O Z U � N y r O m0 `o � ,z�`+ L r♦i l�1 y M N U N (J C X �+ A f-, NN Vi L {L CC 0. 0 0n E � In E y V C 4.J o O co Y �� 4:;:Lu ; W 1-7W � O C W W J -1 -5 L'o W IW 0 o ly CDW � Z Q DY © O LCJ m --EET HUMBER C2.01 AREA5 ft. +/—) ck I 1 ... 1,872 2...1, GG4 = 3...1, GG4 4.. ' 6 7...I, kil 8...1,872 q...30,259 MOFtNINC(--,,�-r)R`! /' i 'Y r yy/`` X83.6 �r \ 4) \ / 0 30 .., .,. ,60 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET / • DENOTES IRON MONUMEN.r FOUND o DENOTES 1/2 INCH BY 14 INCH 40 IRON MONUMENT SET WITH PLASTIC 71114� PLUG INSCRIBED WITH BWK 10918 A� NOTE: All of Lot q is dediccted as a / Droinage and Utility Easement. 1 \ \ 69 / kC / 8 \ \ — \\\\ �'/g //T/ON C-)/ \ N`\5648 / 6333 SO 5?C,0 I = 969.E P o�� 33501 00 . /' i 'Y r yy/`` X83.6 �r \ 4) \ / 0 30 .., .,. ,60 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET / • DENOTES IRON MONUMEN.r FOUND o DENOTES 1/2 INCH BY 14 INCH / IRON MONUMENT SET WITH PLASTIC r / PLUG INSCRIBED WITH BWK 10918 A� NOTE: All of Lot q is dediccted as a / Droinage and Utility Easement. 1 \ \ KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That Henry Webster, Jr., fee owner of the following described property situated in the City of Monticello, Wright County, Minnesota to wit: Lots 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, B. 9, and 10, Block 25, MONTICELLO, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the Office of the County Recorder, Wright County, Minnesota, except the Northeasterly 139.00 feet of said Lots 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 as measured at right angles to and parallel with the northeasterly line of said Block 25: Have caused the some to be surveyed and platted as MORNING GLORY, and do hereby dedicate to the public for public use forever the easements as shown on this plot for drainage and utility purposes only. In witness whereof said Henry Webster, Jr., fee owner, has hereunto set his hand this day of 20— Henry Webster, Jr. STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20 by Henry Webster, Jr., fee owner. Notary Public, county, Minnesota My Commission Expires SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE I hereby certify that I have surveyed and platted the property described on this plot as MORNING GLORY, that this plat is a correct representation of the survey, that all distances are correctly shown on the plot in feet and hundredths of a foot, that oil monuments have been correctly placed in the ground as shown, that the outside boundary lines arecorrectly designated on the plat and that there are no wet lands as defined in Minnesota Statues, Section 505.02, Subdivision 1 or public highways to be designated other than as shown. Sidney P. Williamson, Land Surveyor Minnesota License Number 10918 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF WRIGHT The foregoing Surveyors Certificate was acknowledged before me this _ day of Number 10918. 20 by Sidney P. Williamson, Land Surveyor, Minnesota License Notary Public, Stearns County, Minnesota My Commission Expires 31 January 2005 MON710ELLO PLANNING COMMISSION This plat of MORNING GLORY was approved by the planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, at a meeting held the_ day of 20__, Mayor Clerk MDNTICELLO CITY COUNCIL We do hereby certify that on theday of 20 . the City Council of Monticello, Minnesota approved this plat of MORNING GLORY. Mayor Clerk WRIGHT COUNTY SURVEYOR 1 hereby certify that this plat of MORNING GLORY hos been checked and recommended for approval this _ day of 20 Wright County Surveyor Minnesota License Number WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITOR I hereby certify that the taxes on the land described hereon are paid for all years through year and transfer entered this _—__ day of 20 Wright County Auditor WRIGHT COUNTY TREASURER I hereby certify that the taxes on the land described hereon are paid for the year 20 this ---- day of —_—_— 20__...- \ Wright County Treasurer WRIGHT COUNTY RECORDER �f Bonestroo I hereby certify that this plat of MORNING GLORY was filed this _— day of Williamson BEARING ORIENTATIONS ----—_—__—. 20___, at _ — o'clock .M., and was duly recorded in Plot Cabinet No. __---, Document Kotsmith /\ THE BEARING ORIENTATION OF THI5 PLAT 15 BASED UPON THE WEST LINE OF / BLOCK 25, ASSUMED TO BEAR NORTH 00'34'4511 WEST. Enpktil r ArcMtocts \ Wright County Recorder - & rveyors -��,�Il.n,e��•111�11 II Iu�.�l�„IIII,�I.Au�.i1L�..Ili...u�..i..l.�ilr�ll.11l�,wA,ulrwrl r.,u..l,.�,��l.u.rllu.l.,le..IJr.I...u.lAnJrru.Al.l.11u�.��, ., ,nA.rl ..I u, ,.,1. 1111 11.1.v,AlJ mill ,Y.Yw a11,1,I�W1.l,��ra.�,ununr r,l,�.,.,�1uu 111 J.I.0 wu�.��rl�..wuor..u�l.I��nl,e�dY,�W,.l�l�.11�,.��ll��lu,��.� 1 .,ilit e. 6I,-1Ait„ii, l.... ., AI 111 Jif rri li�,l.mil"'..u— IreY,.JlLLInllrilililLllYdi.6i .,ii i�i....III I.I. uiYr.,l I.0kill 11 Ikl, All lu. d"lYa 5 E.- 0 20 40 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET : // t 1 // SILT FENCE & ROCK ENTRANCE `f INSTALLATION SHALL TAKE PLACE IMMEDIATELY AFTER REMOVAL OF EXISTING TREES AND CONCRETE 4 BLOCK 1 f / I "= i ''6 S3LE FENCE SHALL 8E INSTALLED A5 SHOWN ON THE PLAN AND/OR AS DETERMINED I / N THE FIELD BY THE CITY �' `-'„`� ;� / i`✓� t �`��/ /� / / INSPECTOR. yerd{ • � N 1 ,.. '';ia!/ / �V.'4' R lop 4i.- _�//' t �N r �'` •�'' ``^.�'<r.,,/ /Jj/J,r / / f INV'— 324a 55 flp ID 4,1 \:•. «,i "''y., / / \ sof .: �iVL -'°..p r <^a /f '`i �f C` /\ �7 fr� .,.�` •.ivy -A. 'CATCH BASIN _ BALE FY ell ` fI , if SANITAPY SMOIPE; ROCK DRRANCI: MUST BE CONSTRUCTED PRKIR TO THE COMMEIK�NT OF GRADpNG OP£RATXM ON THE STE. THE ENTRANCE SHALL BE W IN LENGTH. TME ENTRANCE MUST BE MA9NTAN® N PROPER CONDITION TO PREVENT TRACKMG OF MUD OFF SITE TMS WY REOJNM POOODIC TCPOF4 SWC NTH ADDITIONAL ROCK, OR REwO'VAL AND RONSTALEATION OF THE PAD. THIS ENTRANCE VALL BE USED BY ALL VD*CLES ENTERMG OR LEAVING THE PRO.ECT. THE ROCK ENTRANCE 110.E BE R]IOMM MIIEWTELY PRM TO THE PLAt.ELENT OF BITUMMDUS RWACW- NONWOVEN GE0II7RILE TEMPORARY ROCK ENTRANCE DETAIL NOT TO SCALE HAY BALES MIN 4 PER BUTT BALES CATCH BASIN TIGHTLY TOGETHER 2'x 2' WOODEN STAKES a ° ° ° I 10'(MIN) CATCH \ BASIN BALES MUST OVERLAP 1/2 BALE �'.' 5 J�) ]�{!.a s.:(.�1'��/t'j'�/\� t�'`.,,� 6�y�•�ff{.�%l/r`Z1�'�►�� / / `r fit. _ZII T FC_T!!`E Tau/ r MAINTENANCE 780 Fi a / r -7 ~;'�^v� � � p r ';..%` / .._ _. � j r .� \ /,•illy „�.. ' � •_, �"<� j`� / . ---." sr•=: / .,..,... _.ice �.. / \ --J .... - 1� , `_ / r IN J 0 20 40 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET : // t 1 // SILT FENCE & ROCK ENTRANCE `f INSTALLATION SHALL TAKE PLACE IMMEDIATELY AFTER REMOVAL OF EXISTING TREES AND CONCRETE 4 BLOCK 1 f / I "= i ''6 S3LE FENCE SHALL 8E INSTALLED A5 SHOWN ON THE PLAN AND/OR AS DETERMINED I / N THE FIELD BY THE CITY �' `-'„`� ;� / i`✓� t �`��/ /� / / INSPECTOR. yerd{ • � N 1 ,.. '';ia!/ / �V.'4' R lop 4i.- _�//' t �N r �'` •�'' ``^.�'<r.,,/ /Jj/J,r / / f INV'— 324a 55 flp ID 4,1 \:•. «,i "''y., / / \ sof .: �iVL -'°..p r <^a /f '`i �f C` /\ �7 fr� .,.�` •.ivy -A. 'CATCH BASIN _ BALE FY ell ` fI , if SANITAPY SMOIPE; ROCK DRRANCI: MUST BE CONSTRUCTED PRKIR TO THE COMMEIK�NT OF GRADpNG OP£RATXM ON THE STE. THE ENTRANCE SHALL BE W IN LENGTH. TME ENTRANCE MUST BE MA9NTAN® N PROPER CONDITION TO PREVENT TRACKMG OF MUD OFF SITE TMS WY REOJNM POOODIC TCPOF4 SWC NTH ADDITIONAL ROCK, OR REwO'VAL AND RONSTALEATION OF THE PAD. THIS ENTRANCE VALL BE USED BY ALL VD*CLES ENTERMG OR LEAVING THE PRO.ECT. THE ROCK ENTRANCE 110.E BE R]IOMM MIIEWTELY PRM TO THE PLAt.ELENT OF BITUMMDUS RWACW- NONWOVEN GE0II7RILE TEMPORARY ROCK ENTRANCE DETAIL NOT TO SCALE CATCH BASIN SALE CHECK DETAIL NOT TO SCALE METAL POST, 5 FT. MIN POST LENGTH AT B FT. GEOTEXTILE FABRIC MAX. SPACING 1 WIRE MESH REINFORCEMENT 30' MIN. WIDTH. EXTEND WIRE TIES -'3I WIRE MESH INTO TRENCH I 2 Fr. MIN. POST EMBEDMENT ( —DIRECTION OF RUNOFF FLOW NATURAL SOILS�/ FABRIC ANCHORAGE TRENCH BACKFILL TRENCH WITH COMPACTED SOILS - 6'x 6'(MIN) SILT FENCE SHALL MEET Mn/DOT SPEC. 2573 & 3886 FOR HEAVY DUTY SILT FENCE. SILT FENCE DETAIL NOT TO SCALE 14 I- LLj (Z J O o j z 0Qo LJ )- o i [if (n Li � C) CD W o Q —Iz0 0 W m SHEET Numom 02.02 HAY BALES MIN 4 PER BUTT BALES CATCH BASIN TIGHTLY TOGETHER 2'x 2' WOODEN STAKES a ° ° ° I 10'(MIN) CATCH \ BASIN BALES MUST OVERLAP 1/2 BALE CATCH BASIN SALE CHECK DETAIL NOT TO SCALE METAL POST, 5 FT. MIN POST LENGTH AT B FT. GEOTEXTILE FABRIC MAX. SPACING 1 WIRE MESH REINFORCEMENT 30' MIN. WIDTH. EXTEND WIRE TIES -'3I WIRE MESH INTO TRENCH I 2 Fr. MIN. POST EMBEDMENT ( —DIRECTION OF RUNOFF FLOW NATURAL SOILS�/ FABRIC ANCHORAGE TRENCH BACKFILL TRENCH WITH COMPACTED SOILS - 6'x 6'(MIN) SILT FENCE SHALL MEET Mn/DOT SPEC. 2573 & 3886 FOR HEAVY DUTY SILT FENCE. SILT FENCE DETAIL NOT TO SCALE 14 I- LLj (Z J O o j z 0Qo LJ )- o i [if (n Li � C) CD W o Q —Iz0 0 W m SHEET Numom 02.02 6, TOPSOIL a sm my i --TOP RIPRAP 928.0 PROFILE–GRADE BOTTOWRIPRAP 927.1 WIDTH) cc TOP OF BERM 928.50 0 SUBGROP TADE 0 OF 2[L �D 5* 20" BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE J LVWE35030B (110J/IN/SY) TOP OF in S BERM 92850 BITUMINOUS TACK COAT (0.05 GAL/SY)INCIDENTAL CD APRON 4' CONCRETE WALK ---2.0* BITUMINOUS NON–WEARING COURSE INV 927 1 LVNW250306 (110#/IN/SY) 4" AGGREGATE BASE —8- AGGREGATE BASE COURSE, CL5 COURSE, CL5 Lil LJ 24! X 15* STORM, WWi SEWER 0 0.20X m cc (INCLUDES";kkON WEST FOURTH STREET TYPICAL SECTION Cb =R NOT TO SCALE (MANHOLE TOC: � 930.0 LLn r', INV �i 927,15,, 0 Ln U) CASTING: NEENAA-R-:wlhS 3 kD tD E Z rLQ �i -STRUCTURE. 4020-48" if ALJ 0 Ln -1 v 6 N0 (N 0 JT x m 0 m ez N (U GV A, J ro rl - LL Z, 2.0' BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE .7 CL LVWE3503oe (110#/IN/SY) en Qv —BITUMINOUS TACK COAT (0.05 GAL /SY)INCIDENTAL NON–WEARING COURSE 0 --2" BITUMINOUS 65 LVNW35030B (110#/IN/SY) In ate :E�-j E u l 12* AGGREGATE BASE COURSE, CL5 :E [2 6 PoE 151'K 15STOR" M If SEWER 0 0.2()%—/t 0 TYPICAL PAVEMENT RESTORATION NOT TO SCALE uj j NY AF pl > oio 41 z y'. —2.5" BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE Ld 0 j // . . ........ QM-H� Pr_`�'- A! LVWE35030B (110#,4N/SY) IN"v=924.55, (M,2 RIOT Wa- < _4' AGGREGATE BASE COURSE, CL5 0 _j CATH BASIN, LJ L.LJ TOC > CD — 929.721, < TYPICAL DRIVEWAY Ld '45 KSWI� INV 927. p NOT TO SCALE —3 _j < CASTING: NEENAH R P TYPE'., L A j Ljj >_ STRUCTURE. �o 93,3 > of 0 LIJ _j Z < C) 0 CD z 1930 J �V NOTE. ALL TURF AREAS DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION < Z of SHALL BE RESPREAD WITH 6' TOPSOIL AND SODDED. < 0:� CD POND AREA SHALL BE SEEDED WITH MNDOT 26A AND C) 0 EROSION STABILIZATION BLANKET INSTALLED FROM THE 9.32 TOE OF THE POND To THE EXTENT OF THE DISTURBED AREA. C) 20 40 0 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FM m Zp /* 334c C3.01 —T >< f -,C 932.3 INVv4 927.26 DI PLLIC;.:L 1 ACH _4 XA p cb re 4, j/Q,4x f 4, fl - "j v PLUG- — ' vy;,H. LG--A*D0N is V i - lll=*,* 5 924.! e > 4 9 A, 9 71 -STREET RESTORATION 180 SY (SEE DETAIL, SHEET C3.01) /* j X 8* TAPPING c SLEEVE & VALVE 1 EACH 8' X 6" DI TEE 1 EACH (SEE DETAIL) 8* GATE VALVE & BOX — 1 EACH 6" GATE VALVE & BOX I EACH . .. .....;f, -CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY MANHOLE 1 EACH (CORE DRILL_W/ WATERTIGHT BOOT) P/ SAN CT klj TOF CASTINC ELE,- INVER7 ELL- 9 4 EXISTING FORCEMAIN LOCATION AND ELEVATION MUST BE VERIFIED IN THE FIELD Lit,& 020 Q = SCALE IN FEET 8" DI WATER MAIN, CLASS 52 210 LF 6' DI WATER MAIN, CLASS 52 210 LF 3- POLYSTYRENE INSULATION (6' WIDE) — 380 Sy 8* X 4" PVC WYE — 8 EACH 4" PVC SERVICE PIPE — 200 LF 1" CORPORATION — 8 EACH 1* CURB STOP & BOX — EACH 1" COPPER SERVICE PIPE — 200 LF HYDRANT ASSEMBLY 5" HYDRANT — 2 EACH 6" GATE VALVE & BOX — 2 EACH 8" X 60 TEE — 1 EACH 6" X 6" TEE — 1 EACH 60 DI WATER MAIN, CL 52 — 20 LF ALL CONSTRUCTION FOR THIS PR04ECT SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF MONTICELLO'S STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO ACQUIRE ANY PERMITS AND PROVIDE ANY BONDS NECESSARY FOR WORK CONDUCTED WITHIN WRIGHT COUNTY AND THE CITY OF MONTICELLO RIGHTS—OF—WAY. THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT A DETOUR AND/OR TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN TO THE CITY OF MONTICELLO AND WRIGHT COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO MAKING THE UTILITY CONNECTIONS IN ELM STREET. NO CONSTRUCTION MAY OCCUR UNTIL WRITTEN APPROVAL HAS BEEN GIVEN FOR THE DETOUR AND/OR TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN. a- 12" X 8" TAPPING to SLEEVE & VALVE (CENTER BETWEEN TEE AND REDUCER) W E)22SNV 12' DIP WATER MAIN 8' Of WATER MAIN 3.5' II SHEET NUMBER C4.01 City Council Agenda - 07/22/02 5F. Consideration of concept and development stage planned unit development and preliminary plat for Autumn Ridge. Applicant: Shawn Weinand - Ocello, LLC. (JO) This item is on the consent agenda but staff would be happy to provide a presentation on this project if requested. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND, At the Planning Commission meeting on 7/2/02 the Planning Commission reviewed the project and voted to recommend approval, subject to completion of refinements to the road system and subject to comments from the Parks Commission. The requested changes have been made and thus the project is ready for City Council review. Ocello LLC has submitted an application for PUD site plan review. The property is located west of Oakwood Drive and south of School Boulevard and is zoned PZM, Performance Zone -Mixed. The site consists of 21.59 acres. The applicant is proposing to construct 167 unit townhomes with a density of 7.7 units per acre. Land Use. The area that surrounds the proposed development consists of a mobile home park to the south, commercial to the west, industrial to the north and single-family to the east. The mid -density residential land use would be compatible with the surrounding pattern. Zoning. The purpose of the PZ -Mixed Zoning District is to provide a land use transition between high density residential land uses and low intensity business land uses, as well as the intermixing of each land use. The density requirements for this zoning district are 5,000 square feet per unit. Setback requirements for this district call for flexibility, however, City Code suggests 20 feet in the side yard and 30 feet in rear yards. Staffs concerns regarding the setbacks of this development have been resolved with the latest revision. All buildings, decks, and porches must meet the minimum 30 -foot setbacks. The setback areas of particular concern are those along both street frontages around the perimeter of the site. Access/Circulation. 1. Following are staff comments on the original layout shown to the Planning Commission. The revised layout in your packet is acceptable from the City Planner's standpoint as it addressed the main concerns through creation of a "roundabout" in the middle of the development. The current access and traffic circulation plan should be modified to reflect more intuitive circulation throughout the project. Staff recommends a more continuous looped roadway with spur streets to perimeter access points along with spacing the intersections to avoid conflicts with City Council Agenda - 07/22/02 driveways. Staff recommends a minimum of three access points, as shown on the site plan, as the minimum required for this project. Staff has additional concerns regarding several oddly angled intersections, combined with several driveways backing out into the middle of the intersections. Trails. The current plan shows a series of internal trails that connect School Boulevard near the driveway access to Edmondson near the northern driveway access and to the south along the utility easement. Staff recommends that a trail system be incorporated into this plan that will link to existing trails on the northeast and southeast corners of the project. The plan should be designed so that individual units would be within 200 feet of a trail or sidewalk leading to a trail on school Blvd. or Edmundson (Co Rd 117). Staff would recommend that a public trail along Edmondson be completed with the project. Staff does not recommend sidewalks along internal streets due to the impact on landscaping. The changes requested above were made to the revised plan. Off -Street Parking. The applicant is proposing 42 guest parking stalls. Because no off- street parking will be allowed on private drives, staff is recommending a ratio of one parking space per three dwelling units or a total of 55 parking stalls needed. Therefore, an additional 13 parking stalls must be incorporated into the development. The additional 13 stalls should be incorporated in the northwest corner, southwest corner, middle, and northeast corner of the project. The changes requested above were made to the revised plan. Landscaping Plan. Staff recommends berm placement along Edmondson as well as to construct a pathway along the planting area. The applicant should intensively landscape areas with high exposure to offset the impact of high-density, low open space design. These include areas around the play area, areas around guest parking, and areas behind proposed townhomes. The applicant should provide additional landscaping around the southerly portion of the project. The area between the mobile home park and power lines to the south should be heavily landscaped and buffer the project from the adjacent properties. This change needs to be verified with revised landscaping plan. Outdoor Recreation. The current plan shows two private small tot -lots and additional "Hot -Shot" basketball court along the southerly utility easements. All play areas should be located away from easement areas. It is suggested that Klein Farms Park is close enough to provide an adequate local public park resource. #2. The Parks Commission reviewed the plan and indicated acceptance of the park and trail layout with the exception that the basketball court should be removed as it is not a feature that young families would use and it could attract kids from outside the development area. The Parks Commission supported granting some credit for park improvements made against the $142,000 in park dedication expense but the amount is yet to be determined. 0 City Council Agenda - 07/22/02 Lighting. A detailed private street lighting plan must be submitted to public works prior to development. Grading, Utilities and Drainage Plans. All grading plans are subject to review of the City Engineer. Design Guidelines. According to City Code, the PUD allows for higher standards of site and building design standards. As such, staff feel that this proposed development should provide the community a high standard of building design. These include brick elements on the front of buildings, texture -look roofing materials, and steeper roof pitches (6/12 to 8/12 or more). This needs to be confirmed. Phasing. According to City Code, no such stage, when averaged with all previously completed stages, may have a residential density that exceeds 25% of the proposed residential density of the entire PUD. Moreover, staff recommends that no more than 50 units should be built before a second access is provided within the project. Easements. Staff recommends that the applicant provide documentation from the gas company regarding the gas line easements and the construction of this project. Development Agreement. The development agreement must include information for the maintenance of all open spaces facilities. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS I . Motion to grant approval of the development stage PUD with staff recommendations. 2. Motion to deny development based on inconsistent street patterns and problems with traffic circulation as well as the higher density that is inconsistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. 3. Motion to table based on a lack of information. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission was comfortable'with forwarding this to the City Council with modifications. The modifications have been made, therefore staff recommends approval, subject to the following conditions: 1. A detailed landscaping plan must be submitted that includes buffer areas, berms, and City Council Agenda - 07/22/02 more intensive landscaping in the rear areas to mitigate site lines as well as the area between the proposed development and the mobile homes to the south. 2. A detailed lighting plan must be submitted to public works and is subject to Cit staff approval. J y �. The applicant must resolve easement issues and receive permission from the gas company for the second access to Edmondson with the County. The grading, draina e and utility plan must be approved by the City Engineer. g ' 4. All buildings, porches, and decks, must be setback a minimum of 30 feet. 5. Further recommendations by City staff. SUPPORTING DATA 1. Revised site plan 2. Original Site Location Map �. Original Boundary Survey Map 4. Original Site Plan Map 5. Original Preliminary Plat Map 6. Original Grading Plan Map 7. Original Preliminary Utility Map 8. Original Landscaping Plan Map 9. Original Parks Commission Minutes 4 3 4 / 2 6 / / 5 3 2 F`•• / l 1 / / 7 2 . 3 4 5 6 Al / s 1 2 4 1 2 3 4 46 4�1 N 8932'42' W 477.41 — s — — — — — — — — — — 5 \ \ e' BIT. — 1 TRAIL t I 1 50 � I \ 50 VOU T A 6 2 3 4^ \5 5 4 6 3 I \ \I / v 2 1,.. 4 \ 1 1 I I \ — TL 2 ^ 2 \ 3 I 1 6 4 \ 3 tib' 4 as 5 \ 2 ` 5 SETTY 4 4 \ I I 3 , i \ 3 I `•h,� 2 2 4\ \ 2 1 \ 6 I 5 / 2 \ \ \ 4 I (w .3 I \ w OUTLOT A 4 1 \ 1 1 2 3 3 4 2 2 3 \\ \ 1 4 1 2 3 3 \ 4 6 5 \ \ 7 / 4 I \ o \\ \ �•... - — rnrMVAeers s AY \ \ \. \ ,` \ � , � \ 711 N• \ i `A'yp1� 589'33'54"W 122.24 ' Engineering Planning • Surveying 1'FRA McCombs Frank Hoot Associates, inc. 15050 2Yd Avenue North • PlXnwth, Mhnesoto" 55447 phone 763/476-6010 • lax 763/476-8532 E -Mail : mlroOmlrD. Whilift Ocella, LLC kwom, w Probed DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY Autumn RldgeY_ I. GROSS SIZE AREA ntIM110, MN 940,371 SF OR 21.39 ACRES 2. LOT SUMMARY: e UNIT HOMES 7 UNIT HOMES B D.U. 6UNIT HOMES 7 D.U. 5 UNIT HOMES e4 D.U, 4 UMT HOMES 10 D, U. 3 UNIT HOMES 52 D.U. Shad To 2 UNIT HOMES 6 D.U. 2 D.U, 169 O.U. GROSS DENSITY ]8 UMTS/ACRE NET AREADENSITY -LESS NSP EASEMENT 87 UNITS/ACRE Preliminary Site Plan 3. GOMMaN AREA 49CEN(OUTLT )I 14.67 ACRES (sex) COMMON OPEN GREEN SP COMMON TRML LENGTH 11.18 ACRES (52PJ') 3850 FEET 4. PROPOSED PARKING 113 SPACE PER WIT) UNEST PARKING UNIT PARKING (2(GARAGE SPACE5u2 W FRONT Or GARAGE)6 59 SPACES 5SPACES TOTAL PARKING 732 SPACES 5. PROPOSET YARD SE SETBACKS. FRONT YARD SETBACK (GARAGE TO CURBLINE) 25 FEET CORNER LOi SIDE YARD ADJACENT TO DRIVE REAR YARD SETBACK j5 FnEET EET 8"NUM DISTANCE BETWEEN BUILDINGS 22 FEET BUILDING SETBACK FROM PUBLIC ROW 30 FEET ' 6. EXISTING ZONING - PZM I hereby certify that this plan was Prepored by EAOtSRNG ZONING Or ADJACENT PROPERTY Y TO THE Y TO THE NORSTN IS�U3TRIAAL me or undrLcensedcProfessonainand Enginea 1 I am a duly 7. PROJECT CONSTRUCTED IN THREE PHASE3. under the IQyg Of t�Scte(Minnesota. B. ALL PROPOSED ROADS TO BE 2e• BACK TO BACK PRIVATE STREET,,, �1d}\J� Sianoture �A DEVELOPMENT NOTES Name DOV1d Nosh I. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST FOOT, 2 US Rr ANO DRAINAGE EASEMENTS SHALL BE PRONGED Dote 6/17/02 LICCOfie 21838 PRONDEDIROVER UALL PUBLIC URLIRES/,Np UpE TO THEE Hlpl WATER LEVEL Or ALL PONDS Designed MJG Checked MJG Drawn AMB Approved DJN Date 6/17/02 Berlsbns No. Date By Remarks A P7/09/0, JMTIPer City Request I I I I I � I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i { I I I Sheaf RovWm 3 A NORTH 7 ~ i GENERAL PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT AUTUMN RIDGE PREPARED FOR OCELL09 LLC CITY OF MONTICELLO DEVELOPMENT TEAM DIRECTORY PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANTS: LLC 11915, roc MFRA (Plonner/Sury r 11915 Brockton Ave. N.E. 15050 23rd Avenue North andscape Architect) 5550 MN '86309 783) A28 -441J phan� t(S 3) 451513441-10 046010 Attention — Mlke Oak INDEX SHEET N0. SHEET NAME 1 TITLE SHEET 2 BOUNDARY SURVEY & EXISTING CONDITIONS 3 SITE PLAN 4 PRELIMINARY PLAT 5 PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN 6 PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN 7 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN Engineering PlanningRA Surveyng F McComb�t Frs�C Roos Anockta, lea. 1J060 73rd Avwue Nath • >'1'Yeoulh� Mimepto • &-447 phare 76JI476-6010 • fax 76J/476 -85J1 E—Mai: mfroOn/ra.c0rn Ch OWN, LLC Ami..w ftw Autumn Ride *soft&, iw lkd nr Title Sheet I hereby certify that this plon was prepared by me or under my dkect wpervisian and tAat I am a duly LlGenxd pr0fessional Engineer under the Idsn.� (�Iof tJ $Votev of Minnesota. S inature l��\J�y� G� Name David Nash Dote 6/17/02 Lleense j 21538 Designed MJG Checked Drawn JMT Approved Date 6/17/02 no pnift MJG DA . \ MAP =M I t . \ \ \\!' .�f .�i� ,� ,...a.,,�'�•-� . �� y i �basr v` Ts�w ;�hdk�': . � ._ .�'; �_ .�� _ W .fir • --•� ,r R I►ama,am ` . 41 / Jam/ \`•�♦\ DRAINAGE TIU TY - o\— -- — — — ��` ° 4e2.52 •A `- PP , -- /\EA=NT• PER PLAT) .r .r te'} —=•� .r •r . r • / .}^ �4}O't'.., \y�. , 'r DRAINAGE ar UnuTY .x ASEMENT le ,}" \ \ \�.. AV .r ER PLAT1-., ty`1,1�� - \\ �•. Air \ ' .r/ I , DRAINAGE &�_^L .�' \ •w 'UTILITY EASEMENT ,titrr�i l ...� l w / serww .r \ \ • ti\ \ I ,rare . • •, o _ a w \\ N, • .r / iv •./ - ,}r .tie �,.t � \ ;, I,Z .J�'-- :.I . '' ,tip' gel \ / / .. '0-i ••S" .til' 7 I � I ^/\� •}: 4 \ -je IV r r - r I .;, j I \ \ \ \ \ \ .tie l } I \ \ \ \ \or 1� i w! vor ,.r �,t. v UnUTY•tr `>T,` '-'}!- �K '• , I \• � \ t . _ EASFMFN7r- \�` .y;,_ •� _- ..- _� '�. - - (PCR T'WT) 1*r •Y7 \ \ I '}° wove ` 1 `xi" .r •}r �w-.� �•w. "v �.}�''+�, PP � � � � I �'�'�.tildr�� ,� � _ _ � _ .tir'' !'• `\ \� ,�►' \ \ •'� � .til"- I '` , Z46 \ w \ \ 6.... l�'� •� , t. A'!r - \ �'i h_�,A `-'•., \ \ ..`- �. �' 1I� \ \ � r! .r I ' �* �� ,,7 \ \ !p V � \ ` :i ^� .... ,.y' !!.}r '' tiles\) '.,�s\1 ...�� \ \ �`• •�L \ \ �•�. � I �.1 7w,S•�� --� ))� .r \ \ ••,M' - . `� � 1 *! \�w.w....,...e ' !% \' ", �� jlyd"''^..\.� \ V.' ' '1 . \ \ \."_' ----.i*, I + .�i - N \ 1 . '.� -� , - .yA _ ' •"', dip.• \ \ I ~ lie 41 \ •}r; O� 40'. I tir w vii I t _ ,�•` .... .r \ .tilo ` - 1 \ � ��\.�'. '- " .}r' ti '�`'•': - '•� ` - \ .til" I ' \ �( aa•41r: .1i" .�*' \� � _ � `\ "' .0 e7y�'f � \ \ .w yr f �-- — \ \ P�•: ,.L,_ ,! .}rte '}r •r \, \ Tb at.�(/Ju \ \ I }\. r•... !� <r a, tr a e vAty • I` }:\ '. tiiir r uS,W ,u.24=,tk — J ---------T--- 1 50.00 \ .r o SE CORNER OF SW 1/4 OF \ SECTION 14, T. 121, R. 25 LEGEND \\ ' .. , `}ravrwor WRIGHT COUNTY, C.I.M. 51 DENOTES MONUMENT FOUND DENOTES 1/2" X 14' IRON PIPE PLACED EXISTING STORM SEWER � EXISTMG SANITARY SEWER -_ EXISTNG WATERMAIN, HYDRANT. AND VALVE _ _ .... .... ... _ EXISTING OVERHEAO(OHE) ELECTRIC LINE, --. pT�i\.rni]! POWER POLE AND GUY WIRE 1H - iii R 11 EXISTING UNDERGROUND GAS UNE EXISTING BURIED TELEPHONE LINE 0 30 60 120 1 240 Engineering - Planning 5 , Nr.......... } ........:........ McComb= Fra Aaaockh 1J0.'r0 2Sd A ' . ,swre NMA • P1ynoorl4 Nhnan _...,.Phone 763/476-6010 •lox 76J/ E -Nod. mlrol cam m, 000110, LLC p AMMwr, M WWW o Lmp ■o acA� how Autumn Ridge Skid n. Boundary Surer A Exi=ting Condition: 2 /7 I hereby certify that this plan was prepor me or under my drect supervision and It I am a duly Licensed Professional Surveyr GENERAL NOT under the laws of the State of Minneeoic Signature I. Bearing system shown is assured - 2, Underground utility locations, I: any, shown hereon Name n are approximate ol P,.w•suont to MS 2161), contact Gopher State One Coll of <k-454-0002 ale License No. prior to any excavation. - 3. Property Zoning - PZM 4. Area , 940,571 SO. FT, or 21.59 Acres. 5. This survey and the easements shown hereon Is based on Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Devgned Checked Company Commitment to Insure File No, T0205240, dated May 28, 2002. 8URVEYDR'c rcotlFE AT Drawn FHZ Approved We hereby certify that this Is a true Date 6/14/02 and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries oFt Dutlot D. Monticello Business Center according to the recorded Plot thereof, Wright County, Minnesota. And of the locations of all buildings thereon, and all vlslote encroachments, If any from or on saki land. As No. Date By Remarks surveyed by me or under my direct supervision, this 14th day of June, 2002. McConbs Frank Roos Associates, Inc, I I I I I Paul A. Johnso ntl Surveyor --- I Minnesoto Licer4e No, 10938 I I i _ I I I I I I I I I i I I I i I l ( i I I I I I I I I I �I I I 2 /7 .Ld / 14.3 16. 8.,11 0.0 .--- / - N 89'52'42" W 477.41 / \ c — / o----- Y \L — _ —_ _ — — — — — 8' Bff. t 5 TRAIL I 50 So ' 1 /l 4/ 4 \\ \ \ \OU T A 5 6 2 3 4 5 6 I / 3 4 2 \\\ 4 3 I _ l 3 1 6 \ \ 3 I -30.b - b 2 5 SETBfCk- ,I 4\ \ 1 4 6 4 I \ 2 3 \ \ 3 2 4 \ 2 3 \ 5 / / \ 4 \ 2 II 2\ 4 J OUTLOT A r 4 I \ / $ / 5 6 3 2 \ 3\ .N Z .✓ 3 \ \ I 4 r 4 m 2 3 / I \ 5 6 \ /\ i l l 1 2 2 2I\\ } 3 \ OU 4 \ 2 \ 3 I w \ / 2 I \ 2 3 o \ 4 3 t I I 2 z 4 \ 3 1 3 \ �\ 6 2 3 , 4 3 t \ 2 \ I \ } 4 2 \ 34 I _ \ \\ 5 2 I I L 3 \\ 5 \\ 2 3 / I \ 6 4 � \ \ 4 tiF 3 I \ \ \ \ 2 4 2 I s \ \ \ \ \ 5 1 -en eWlxe 31AE \ \ 2 \ a9s \ \ 4 \ } \ w�l 4 I \X1. \ \ NL \ \ \ 5 50 -40 +- \� S89'73'54"W 722.24 \ 1 \ Engineering Planning • Surveying �.rr. 'FRA I. is DMCComla FM[ Roos ftsocAkft4 irr. 13850 2Sd A-ve /forth • R .outl% Wwasoto • 15447 phone 76JI476-6010 • fax 763/476-8332 E-MoA., mlraCkrIft com Ck d Ocello, LLC Amkm, M A 0 25 50 100 NORTH I 200 anal noMm 3 7 amu► FILE No_ 13M Autumn Ridpe Montlano, MI DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY 1. GROSS SITE AREA 940.571 SF OR 21.59 ACRES 2. L07 SUMMARY: 8UNIT HOMES IDB D.U. 5 UMT HOMES Is 0.U. iM�t 7i 4 UNIT HOMES 40 O.U. 2 UNIT HOMES 4 D.U. 187 D.U.Prellminary GROSS DENSITY 7.7 UNITS/ACRE 31te Pian NET DENSITY OUTLOT A e.e UNITS/ACRE 1 COMMON AREA (OUILOT A) 14.81 ACRES COMMON OPEN GREEN SPACE 12.28 ACRES l PROPOSED PARKNG OX757 PARKING (1/4 SPACE PER UNIT) 42 SPACES MIT PINKING (2 GARAGE SPACES, 2 M FRONT or GARAGE) me SPACES TOTAL PARKING 710 SPACES S. PROPOSED BURDINC SETBACKS FRONT YARD SETBACK) TO CURBUNE) 25 FEET CORNER LOT SIDE YAR ADJACENT TO DRIVE IS FEET REM YARD SETBACK 30 FEET MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN BUILDINGS 20 FEET BUKDING SETBACK FROM PUBUC ROW 30 FEET I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by �. me or under my direct supervision and that 1 am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer OTEXISIN0 ZONING -PDI EXISTING ZONING OF ADJACENT PROPERTY TO ME WEST IS COMMERCIAL EJOSRNa ZONING OF ADJACENT PROPERTY TO THE NOR7419 INd1577NAL under the Ip1I(e o Sate Minneaota. 7. PROJECT CONSTRUCTFO IN THREE PHASES Sianature III, ALL PROPOSED ROADe TO eE 2e' BACK TO BAC( PRIVATE STREET; Name David Noah DEVELOPMENT NOTES I. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST FOOT. Date 6/17/02 UaeRee 0 21836 2. UTIUTY ANO DRANAOE EASEMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED AS REQUIRED. unlet AND DRAINAGE EASEMENTS WILL BE PROVIDED OVER ALL PUBLIC UTILITES AND UP TO THE HIGH WATER LEVEL OF ALL PONOS. Designed MJG Checked MJG Drawn AMB Approved DJN Date 6/17/02 No. Date By Remarks A 0 25 50 100 NORTH I 200 anal noMm 3 7 amu► FILE No_ 13M \ y \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \\ L=286.46 \ R=1120.00 i :fir A=-14'39'161' / J / \� \ \ DRAINAGE dE UTITYLI BASEMENT (PER PLAT) 5�y�\ l Q cul / a Q/4� k 4 0 \� \ OUTLOT A / ?s 1'17 3'40 W° \ \ \ 0R�1 AcEEN3 Durr / FA 1s i / y '00 1 'V�c4 \ ALL cK d�/npT A / O 2 4. � 4 AN 1 O o 5 G 1 vw�h 6 l 4 8 N?.i DRAINAGE 4 4 UTILITY EASEMENT `� 02 3 1 p > ti 34p �° r h 3 0 8 ~� �4p 6 0 h 1>4p / O / 1 0 20 700 o0 1 hh 70.00 '�4J�•�- 2 SSIJ1j47 9 l l F "000 �t0N'I i I / / fu ?s p •i°q7 N90aOD E p 4 C4 If / '. _ 5 6 _ sry74 2= 370.0 70.0 `y I,J;L04 1'.0 = 70.0 S `'!`• / ,e^?9.0 7 tQ 00 SBI � 4 it za.a sfl�51"70.0 E i / 1 �o 2�0 2a 3d 40 5 6 WoMO 0 3 / / ^ o 32� 2 / / z / 13 1s / M2i117 f 24.0 •! 0 ?9 a' 3 3 00 1 OUTLOT A R r (ZONE - INDUSTRIAL) I �� S89'52'42"E 477.4 l� � •, - N 4µ6,,2.52 0 190 240 74.0lA•O7 24.0 14.0 Iso DRAINAGE 12 sp 50\yY�'A. o 81 o k UTILITY 1 E A, 6•`bg n 2 30 4o EASEMENT NSgd� M1M 5 o c 5^ 6 (PER PLAT) 1 1 \ o �. 4 0 z9 0 19 e o zto. 2+.a zt0$ TO 3 Ap S917191B E' u 140 19.0 2 0 o � 1 \ 1 8A0 1 E OUTLOr A 201°0 1^\ \ 0 N59•p0 ss ORAMA(E' h UMJTY 20' 0 r .� EASEMENT OWR ✓• •1 •o I I ALL OF OUTLOT A •�� 3 0 : I \ \ ti0 4 Qy 011 gip• SO. �'o \'2'' �y �.• � 3 � 1`6Nz6yr14• � ( � I ?_ �_ _ cC 6 R7 ° I J.. �• 2° hod \\f1/AF 4°F ,o �# ` Anp hS I { / \ h3 I ti N9ov0'o0'w 10�° SIS \ '4p •�, 70.00 w OUTLOT A 4 ORAINAOE d UTILITY, ` 1 0 r \\ \ ' 21 ° I °O •"'} . EASEMENT OYER)0. 'a S76y4 9 3 N ALL OF OU1LOr A o 2 \ \ \ Y �0� 112- 70.0 AS \ I I 2 ' 70.0 Q 18Iso 0 s , 47 4 ;90v000�w 7000 1 1 4 0 ?90 d' w° 1717sw p I \ 14 34 4 e I •�.,. p `b a ti 3 I \ \ 4 0 0 s> DRAMAOE k Unum - 10 EASEMENT OYER 3 ° bo ALL OF CU710T A 1q0 A 2 \ \ / / '.s j00 '0 40 1 • � 6 `>}r. 1 'O6CP h. ° 14 F rJK N7?7J.5 0 I I \ ..\ \ \ 4 .0 6 1 5 = 10 o o 1►M : 1 2^a 3 S7T52'08'w I f \\ \ \ \ > 5 O o S8 v51 1r A 3 4 *° zy0 ^ 4 8 ri16 \` \\ \ \ \ i$ >•e 6 �� 29.0 - 19.0 2 0 0 1►P15A� cF3i? �p 5 6 c 70,0 I I \ \ \ \ r 30 1410 5 ~5�o AO LSC 1ap0 M1 ?+ y vs1. , d o 70.0 1 \ \ \ 2 �Ar. 0 1M6'�� t 4 o I \ \ T 2 70.0 \ \ 2 \ a°0 OUTLOT A 3 o W \ ORANAGE A UTILITYc 10.0 I � pp 1°, .o a It 4 S EASEWW7 OWR x 2 I ``•.i \ I \ \ 3 ' J7s, rp 5 0 7p$7ip• ALL OF OUTLOT Aey. g c 70. O \ \t `• \ \ `- DRAINAGE & - \ 4 0 {s` rp .Y�3 12 ?+.o 1 o I Z ^ / UTILITY 10 o titio.° $ �0 7L1a° w EASEMENT \ \ \ 5 22 8 5775206. 1 1 \ I \ j (PER PLAT) r^� I \ 1 l\01 \ 7i \ \ 6 w ° 76, N ?* p 4 Jh . ti ,400 �A 1 \.) 2h �/ " \ \ 1° yf J.ti 8 0 4s• 7ti zip W' - 25 ` �_ 77\ \ •o A62 W5 0 1 0 1>0 'Dir ,� X40 + 2 h'g8 j 158:4b pT32'\N o \ ?•o ^ 4P 1y0 24 ° roti I ( iN \ 1 \ Py o S%6.4 N \ \ z*o 5 2 ! zso - _ ksa 1 vti I ' a � 6 �v Zyp J•iS•F fO�is• ° �ti ,� "1 's4. 00 1�b ^d'110 0 140 z4pJ o ter' _I 2�. 3^ �0 o~ \\ 4 0 25 h v \ F I \ z� 5 h w I I \ N ?46 'O 1 Z ° zio ° 2 z,R2Lir, o I - I Nv di) C) 1 vO° t a. 1 w cL`'i1 ' \\\ 77 OOCNS-",N i \\\ \\\ 0 20309 01'0 I I \ I 4 ° S8j91 5 3ES��e¢ fro 409 5100�ogI 112 4 50 50 \� 122.24 --- -- -- /------- j-- , \ t\ I \\ \ N89'33'54"E >N\00' 1 7 E 8 X10 BALCONYLOT M Drawn FHZ A pproved LOT IN1A�f/P -BLS MAR Date 6/14/02 n RCPSEU 2,d;, OR N)T Lb RnbUTA a . i No. Date By Remarks 10 � -- I 29.0' _140' I 2111'_1 24.0 I - 14.0' I i I } MVA IF STREET I I I TYPICAL LOT DETAIL I i NO SCALE I IILII I I I I I I i I I i I I INd Relmo L1�3 I r)o,.,) /7 INFRA FILE ML 13M Engineering • Planning SJrvE 77 S =MCCIM Fratk A Aawh tes, IMM 2Yd ARertn • q)mafm Mmexte NORTH phone 76J/476-6010 • fox 76J/476- E - I Ma;,: ,nfraanfrl Cbd 0 25 50 100 200 Ocello, LLC AWnw, M LEGAL DESCRIPTION OUTLOT D. MONTICELLO BUSINESS CENTER, WRIGHT COUNTY. MINNESOTA prow DEVELOPER °CELL° Lok 1191! Brxktan A N.E. Autumn Ridge Ph. ( MIK 7533 g Ph. (763)t2D-4413 , DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY 1. GROSS SITE AREA 940.571 2. LOT SUMMARY: e VIdT HOMES 5 UNIT HOMES 4 UNIT HAAS SF ON 21.59 ACRES toe D.U. 15 D.U. 40 O.U. ! �y Shed TO 2 UNIT HOMES GROSS DENSITY 4 D.U. 157 D.U. 7.7 UNITS/ACRE NET DEN DENSITY ounoT A 5.5 urRrs/Aa+E Preliminary Plot 1 COMMON AREA (OUTLOT A) 14.51 ACRES (07%) COMMON OPEN GREEN SPACE 12.20 ACRES (57% . IL PROPOSED PARKING GUEST PARKING (1/4 SPACE PER UNIT) 42 SPACES UNIT PARKING (2 GARAGE SPACES, 2 IN FRONT OF GARAGE) See .SPACES TOTAL PARKING 710 SPACES 5. PROPOSED BUILDING SETBACKS FRONT YARD SETBACK (GARAGE TO CURBLINE) CORNER LOT SqE YARD ADJACFNT TO DRIVE REAR YARD 25 FEET IS FEET SETBACK MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN BUMANaS BUILDING SETBACK FROM PUBLIC ROW 30 FEET 20 RST 30 FEET Iere hby Certify that this plan was prepares me or under my direct supervision and Sha I am a duly Licensed Professional Surveyor e. EXISTING ZONING - PZM EKISRNC ZONNC OF ADJACENT PROPERTY TO THE NORINDUST 13 CIA! EKMV SWNC ZCNo 6 ADJACENT PROPERTY TO THE NORTH IS INDUSTRIAL s 0 under the lawhe Slate of Minnesota. 7. PROJECT CONSTRUCTED IN THREE PHASES Slanature L ALL PROPOSED ROADS TO BE 2s' BACK TO RACK PRIVATE STREETS. Name Paul Johnson DEVELOPMENT NOTES Date 8/14/02 UOOnee A 10938 1. ALL DIMENSION! ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST FOOT. 2. UTILITY AND DRARJAGE EASEMENTS SMALL BE PRONOED AS REWMiEO. UTILITY AND ORA NAGE EASEMENTS WILL 5f FRONDED OKR All PUBLIC UTII„ITIES ANO UP TO THE WATER LEVEL OF ALL PONDS. HIGH Designed MJG Checked M 8 X10 BALCONYLOT M Drawn FHZ A pproved LOT IN1A�f/P -BLS MAR Date 6/14/02 n RCPSEU 2,d;, OR N)T Lb RnbUTA a . i No. Date By Remarks 10 � -- I 29.0' _140' I 2111'_1 24.0 I - 14.0' I i I } MVA IF STREET I I I TYPICAL LOT DETAIL I i NO SCALE I IILII I I I I I I i I I i I I INd Relmo L1�3 I r)o,.,) /7 INFRA FILE ML 13M NOTES: \ I Engineering • Planning Surveying A THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS NECESSARY TO AVOID PROPERTY DAMAGE TO A04A(ENT PROPERTIES DURING THE Y r 2' WOOD POSTS t -FILTER 11801 \ \ _ \ CONSTRUCTION PHASES OF THIS PROJECT. THE CONTRACTOR MILL BE r, ^ 4.7 O.C. (MRAF1-DW FENCE �` HELD SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGES TO THE ADJACENT OR ARRROWD EQUAL) PROPERTIES OCCURPoNG DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASES OF THIS __ i PROECT. - 8. THE CONTRACTOR MUST CONTACT ALL THE APPROPRIATE UTIUTY SI COMPANIES AT LEAST A6 HOURS BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TO REQUEST ,.1 fC-96A07\. Z F 959.94 i - EXACT FIELD LOCATION OF UTILITIES, IT SHALL BE THE X 96LZ SIMM . 960 6. .: 96�? . • gNa6i WIT[R� % g61 $ . 06� 6 RESPONSIMHIC/I CONFLICT WITH THEBILTY OF THE RPROPTO Om IMPROVEMENTS EXISTINGOCATE ALL " � DIQ7101 0 _ _ _ _ RA ON'w� - - 63 _ _ -.d T yrs / t < OWN ON THE PLANS. THE LOCATIONS OF SMALL UTILITIES 94ALL - MC /--BAOaIl 6' • V TRENCH - \' ,9. -- )(HC.)' - .. 7 _ 'x - _ - __ __. __._ _. ' 9�a2 OBTAINED BY THE CONTRACTOR BY CALUNG GOPHER STATE ONE � .". '' ' Combs Fradc \ _ � .tr OB 1lssocbltes, In. J 0 sr AN CALL (1-600-232-1166). 9 ra ..,,960 g6W3 . , y96?� s �q6�a.ar/.>•e ; / - - C. SILTATION AND EROSION CONTROL: R=1 1 0,0 � R7 � N 89'52'42" W � � 477.4'1 � � Co � • p n:HA¢I.ZI THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR �T 13030 ZSd A MnUe North • PlynovhY, NhneWot6. 55147 9� �_ _ - - - - - _ _ _ _ -� PP CONTROLLING ALL SILTATION AND EROSION OF THE PROJECT AREA. phare 76JI476-6010 • lax 76JI476-6532 ,p OP \ •-� -/+•� ALL EROSION CONTROL AND SILTATION CONTROL MEASURES WILL TURRFD SOL / / 84 \ 66' 2 P 1 COMPLY MTM MINNESOTA'S REST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES MANUAL, E -Moi: mhoOntra can 641 y \ - 9 of 96 9 ^� . THE WIGHT COUNTY CONSERVATION DISTRICT EROSION AND - 9 9 • 96V.A a` 5°' S0 SEDIMENT CONTROL MANUAL, AND THE Cin OF MONTICELLO'S / >r , POLICY FOR EROSION AND SILTATION CONTROL THE CONTRACTOR C SHALL USE WHATEVER MEANS NECESSARY TD CONTROL EROSION AND Ned SILTATION INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO STAKED STRAW BALES, 4 T ; oU S 0 9� ROCK ENTRANCES ANO/OR SILT FENCES. CONTROL SMALL COMMENCE An ! ? WITH GRACING AND CONTINUE THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT UNTIL / I" p A h 3 \ 9 } 9a� ; I g61 ACCEPTANCE OF 171E WORK BY THE OWNER. THE CONTRACTOR'S TRACTOR IN SILT FENCE DETAIL ' \ 0 RREEauIREnDSITO PRAT EROSIOALL N SAND THE DEFAND ��ENTAOFOUSILT, THE Oc'lloE «C OWNER WAY, AT HIS/HER NO SCALE 96 (�� y4 S 6 �- 6$ 1 I. 'I HIS/HER METHODS AS DEEMED OMFlT 60EPROTECT CT THE PROPERTY AM /RIFF lJ IMPROVEMENTS. ANY DEPOSITING OF SILT OR MUD ON NEW OR A •I 'v EXISTING PAVEMENT OR IN EXISTING STORM SEWERS OR SWALES SHALL BE REMOVED AFTER EACH RAN AND EFFECTED AREAS CLEANED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE OWNER. ALL AT THE EXPENSE OF THE CONTRACTOR. THE SILT FENCES SHALL BE REMOVED AND THE SAT REMOVED FROM THE PONDING AREAS BY THE CONTRACTOR AFTER 0E \ 6 N • I �`. _ THE NRF IS ESTABLISHED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE r 2 4 0 4 i �DO to RESPONSIBLE FOR APPLYING TOIL THE MPGA GENERAL STORM WATER w PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BEpr �O S 1 6 \ 3 a O F_ RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPUANCE WITH AND MONITORING THE REQUIREMENT OF THE MPCA PERMIT. S 2 )`II TEMPORARY SEDIMENTNNO CN POS, AT LOCATIONS SELECTED BY OWNER, 6 '' l� T..4• SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH THE INITIAL GRADING. THE SEDIMENT 8 MIST RE REMOVED FROM THESE PONDS, AS NECESSARY, PRIOR TO COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT. Autumn Ridge Y TO T (RA1El /(( - •3 0 a� \ 3 5 O I i .I ...Y D. PROPOSED CONTOURS ARE TO FINISHED SURFACE GRADE. ALL 2 3 °� 0 2 a° I 960 GARAGE FLARE ELEVATION. PLAN GRADE IS TO FINISHED NINON�F M PP 2 0 4 1\ 3 s E THE CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS AND DEFNmONS OF TYPES OF 5 MATERIALS SHALL BE AS SPECIFIED IN MN/DOT 'STANDARD m / 3 SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION' 1986 EDITIONS AND ALL SUPPLEMENTS. RICK SCALE ENTRANCE DRIVE .9633 g679T961 2 5 \ \9 / 961 a 4 h 94.1" F. THE �1TR CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY THTOPSOIL ON THIS SITE ATS IN DEPTH ALLACE 1T IS VEGETATION s1NtTi `/ AK ("L,r .YU ANY TOPSOIL OR OTHER LOOSE, SOFT OR OTHERWISE UNSUITABLE j I 'I�' ' 4y. MATERIAL BE REMOVED FROM THE STREET AND BUILDING PAD AREAS \ 964 ' -'-" PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF ANY EMBANKMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MTN0�1[�ptR�IH�yHALy6[ Ny7� SOLS REPORT. LABOR TO TIE STFJRT 6 ANW' 971 WGt1{ - 9 ,, \/ �6 2 I - ,...� Preliminary THE POUR ENTRANCES SHALL BE NSPECIFD 1 'O \ 1 0 T T A I •� THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SALVAGE ENOUGH TOPSOIL, TO BE SPREAD TO FGLOIWIG EACH RAWALL. YAN7ENAIR Or / /- p d \ A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 4 INCHES BY THE CONTRACTOR IN AREAS THAT Grading Plan 1 o O ? f ti.+ ARE DISTURBED BY THE GRADING CONSTRUCTION. TTHEEyROCK ENI AM ES SH L�RDUUDE A ATNOD - .. _ j` c 6 I iRff ILfLBIT OF UNE a\CL AS HEEDED. TO., • I, T ~� _ K® THE ENTRANCE FREE FROM COLLECTED WD 4 G>'7 9 S (D �3 A 96J I 959'x...., G E]NBANKMENT MATERIAL NOT PLACED IN THE STREET. STREET 199`•2 .a 962( i-;h,j. "1 � � / 'g630 6 ° � g6\6 , q6`'', ` � g6W6 � 2 "' � \ 6 � .9'0"" { �7"� � ACCORDANCEA WITH THE REOURE7MENTS pF THSHALL I CELLA �cACTED IN OMPAcnON '1 4•a •y \ \ METHOD AS OUTLINED IN MN/DOT 2105.JF2. B° Us I H. EXCAVATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF REMOVING UNSTABLE OR UNSLXTA13LE SOILS SHALL BE COMPLETED AS REOUIRED BY THE SOLS / _ O ENGINEER. EMBANKMENT MATERIAL PLACED IN THE STREETS SHALL / �'ry 96 ,S Ay to "�.'• 1 ` ;"� BE COMPACTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFIED DENSITY 1 N O - Q NET OD AS OUTLINED IN MN/DOT 2105.3F1, EMBANKMENT MATERIAL DESIGN PARAMETERS / 2 3 4 95 .3 9 966 1 964 PLACED IN THE BUILDING PAD AREA SHALL BE COMPACTED IN I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by 5 ACCORDANCE WITH THE SOILS REPORT me or under m direct Supervision anedp that MAX SLOPE - GREENSPACE - 4:1 -�\ / I am a dui Licensed Professional Engineer MIN SLOPE - GREENSPACE - 2% J. ALL MTUReeD AREAS, EXCEPT ROADWAYS, SHALL ME under the I a of th Sate MXlneeota. 960.2 963.2 61• .3 CEJ O -: -t'9.6—V 95c,. +bid `• { 4 �? RREST�WITH o IT OFMINIMUM COMP4*TOPSOIL OF SITE SEEDED AND MULCHED MAX SLOPE - PRIVATE ROAD - B% ' 1' •\ / 9 95 , 1 I D 0 5 ,n 5 Sicnature dl0.ntva�. MIN SLOPE - PRIVATE ROAD - 0.5% / / - 960 6 ° 6 m ,6g BE MN DOT MIXTURE NO. $00 (OR APPROVED EQUAL), DORMANT BUILDING LOWEST OPENING ELEVATION - ��ry �� N 0 4 95 \ SEEDING AREAS SHALL BE SEEDED, MULCHED AND DISC ANCHORED. Name David Nash 1 \ \ STRAW MULCHING QUANTITY SHALL BE 2 TONS PER ACRE WHERE V ABOVE EMERGENCY OVERFLOW - / O SLOPES EXCEED 3:1, A POLYPROPYLENE NETTING OR WOOD FIBER MANKET SHALL BE PROVIKO AND STAKED OVER THE MULCHED AREA Date 6/17/02 License I 2183E rLHTLIZER (15 OST -10-10) SHALL 6E APPLIED AT A RATE OF 400 MAXIMUM DRIVEWAY SLOPE - 10% \ \ - r _ A� 0 6 3 q PP\ \ PONOS PRt Ache. MINIMUM DRIVEWAY SLOPE - 2% \ , �'�''9 , 4 9- � \ / 2 \' ° \ \ K. TOLERANCES 8993 4\ _.. g606 ggA .9�' / 95 G' 3 0 9°4 �5 ul s i \ ` I. THE STREET SUBIitADE FINISHED SURFACE ELEVATION SHALL ? \ 0 •NPP F 9 1 9- ^ \ NOT VARY BY MORE THAN 0.05 FOOT ABOVE, OR 0.10 FOOT Designed MJG Checked MJG 6 1 o MADE. BELOW. THE PRESCRIBED ELEVATION OF ANY PONT WHEREMEASUREMENT IS O o` Z 2. AREAS 'WHICH ARE TO RECEIVE TOPSOIL SHALL BE GRADED TO Drawn JMTHOLT Approved DM / / 9 4 S 9 0 v 1 k4 956 6 UNLESS 0 RECTED OTHEWITHIN .30 FOOT RWISE eY TTHHETMENGINEER. REQUIRED ELEVATION. \ \` - 3, TOPSOIL SHALL BE GRADED TO PLUS OR MINUS 1/2 INCH OF DOfG 6/17/02 _ \ - THE SPEGIFTED THICKNESS. _ I 9 2 .0 N. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PRONDNG AND 95 5 x s 6 $ +!`{ MAINTAINING TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SUCH AS BARRICADES. O ••.! P WARNING San DIRECTIONAL SIGNS, FLAGMEN AND LIGHTS TO fi958 F958' '•9�• g5$• \ 1 .,9 62W ? I CONTROL THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC WHERE NECESSARY TRAFFIC 4 ,a 9 CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO APPROPRIATE MINNESOTA PA_IM HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT STANDARDS 9 � No. Date By Remarks 0 2 Q), (t \ \ sd e r 96 ya ' m PROWDE 91mWIE 91RW6R Fa AL PR6O4D SIDEWALKS AND WAILS �� 3 \ \ 1 2 N 958' r Tom iMICAL - / s I - 6 n �-.i � �----� a�n� "00 NWAIE \(L.�sLI,�T ❑GAMMON \ _ _- _ ._......_. -- - `' ` RR�.r-:'a •-"- . S / O ; I IAntAlli�w� -OB'W - L6' TV" SHEETS • a rx NIT ' THE FRONT HOD NO FOR FADE LMT TYPE SHALL BE AS FOL10NS: y pELETED \ I WDU IS SA7W " I I I I QRa is \ LH BYO/} \ �. ' \ \ PPs6 1 9s \�. 3 E a s n CDRr. \ i '+2,mNcnxAL eAvsu HW RAHHBIER 01104-111MK017tJ uRle. THE FRONT HOLD DORM SHALL EiEID4 - _ FROM FRONT O' BUILDING PAD 70 20' BrIOD READ TWIT OF annNG PATI I \i - 324 b5 - ` - _ \ \ \ ` 2 AS IVImRATnc • a SLOE AS REQUIRED BY TIE SLIMS ENGINEER. - 5 2 . ' - ,� f 0 576''10 }2, E 9 PP \ / I N IDIC B7 eR RA7BRAL AS aria a umAu gal I I .,q45 M� A 6 9�yJ ��1 REQLE.M n Pals OWNED WX- THE HEIGHT SEPOATRW BEIEEDH THE WAGE ROON ILIO THE SA-MUTF � I - .� % \ - \ �'A FLOOR IS APPROXIMATELY SO FEET. IH65 No1ED OtXFRWIY. An 1:1 oGRADING 2/ _ 9 PLn � TYPICAL STREET \ ? tp i,\ - J ` - \ \ - 9St 958 1 -- g o 60 ^... 95 C14 AND STREET SECTION DESIGNQRDELRHC3 IEMEr AAS REPORT RECOMMENDATIONRECOMMENDATIONTO CONFIRM 1:1 tis \ V \ \\' •� _ �p o WWALL T \ 6 \ 4 a • 1. rWAI PAWILIIT SEC" 9+ALL OL DEMO MA DING PION \ v1� Or IME on O -WL I I 2S SETBACK _ 26 I' O 2 WOW O WxTR 9NLL PLACE a2 FT. OF AOOTIOML LIRA¢ FLOOR ELLVAIM (AS SNOW OR WADING PLAIN) \ \'� -aM f tLnOF-� / 7 2 W �' 1 \ \ \ \ U WIN a Imo Fr R FUI RACTHE IICLLE� K 1 OF Oft CON`RACTOR ro GIME TO THi amTON .�9p6�- - \ \ . g56. \ 8 95�? I <W L END LO' SPLIT DNiRT (gy \ nRAr/ \--� -_ 47` - � \ S I EXISTING CONTOURS I I I \ .�\ q 0 �' I I I I t } ' S.0' STIR DARE WALKOUT (SEWO) \ Aw0 CB J �' I I \ \ •a� MA952.0 -. ,.... ' \ � � J EXI G STORM SEWER ..- - s7 > --a r/rAONT HOLD Dow • _ + \ PR NC WETLANDS ... . - - - -. \ PRO OSED EROSION CONTROL FENCE lqr (TO BE VERIFIED BY Rlvosm nN9Rm GHra \ \ CITY ENGINEER) \ g5 \ 9c�)Iy/ �ge.4 PROPOSED `:POT ELEVATION X 1207.5 MM SHOWN ON ceADIO RAM \ \ .`1, - PROPOSED CONTOUR 1210 BAGtnL AM ORGMIC GtdC $0 PRO POSED STORM SEWER �� ST ,>�•� RiROMEIIbTA6F YATERNL \ \ 9s�5 9�1'w \ 9A66 __..-,9°g? 'ly'r5 a v „9566_SILL{ � PROPOSED COMMETE CLRR \ � \ - - - . ' \ - - 1 A w 5 msACT[D s1 exrUWAL 610011 GIVING GUAR PP — �- 589'33'54"w 122.24 \ • t ,� �' /7 - \ _ _ 9��` CONTRACTOR TO ETICAYAIE SGL MAT MAL AS REQ66D BY SCEs FIHONEER Yom �-E NORTH TYPICAL BUILDING PAD ' \ \ \ PP 50.00 \ GRADING DETAIL - - -- - - -\ _ y -g59 0 , 3 956 9 95M PP MD scuE \ \ V 0 25 50 100 200 ARTIUM FLE NO-' 13M i SAN M/ SAN 9M,.s9 \ \ - \ \ rL-96,.77 � � \ \ �.--. - -... __.._-_'� - -� ��,,__.. __ _. - 1, •aars9vrrnr� � 1. .tH \ - '-- l.f_. { t IEi J �Y j->' - Y' _ I.- Jr - VN .s -.� 1 +., ,,, c„ • � � ' :-1`.:t _.. 7�,. a Sr .air _ MP -961. TD 11 �g _\1 "ifi' R: 0.0� a 96ao2 2a66pJ N 8952'42' y Y 477.41 ,. t8 - I I \ INV=939.0 i. INV -938.0 1 I / 5 \ I 50 30 \/ ' 2 4 \ \OU5 TLOT A r 6 3 4 5 6 MHP4 TOI966 0 I / 3 TOP -9 0.7 \ 4 INV -940.0 I / 2 )MV -948.a" \ 3 1 \ 2 ! i / 4 L 2 TOP=966.1 \ V=939.5 j 6 4 TOP- 6 / \ TOP -965. 4 0 / 5 I P21 \ 5 1 6 \ \ V=944.4 3 TO I P=960.2 5 _.v \ \ 2 t I I 4 INV -947.6 / / 3 4 \ S \ 3 TO T-965.3 I / 2 3 \ INV -940.6I = / 2 4 \ \ 2 6 I PP 1 / r 3 \ 1 5 :.✓ I TOP -9 •L.' \ / I 11 V=947.0 TOP 19 2 \ \ \ 4 i INV -9 8 3 r I _ e[Aw316 - HPl DCl. fO TOP=9x3.2 \1 9 V=945.2 I l r 2 TO 960.7 `� 4 J OUTLOT A 4 IN 946.3 ? 1 „j 5 6 \ I err 2 t`\ 3 \ I / 4 IF4 -_ m I 4 5 6 I N \ TO i 963.5 l _\ / 1 2 2 INV -946.1 2 3 TOP -959.4 \ \ / / \•' 4 INV=941.7 \ ( \ \ 1 S 5 � .► Top =954. -� 4 I \ T P=959.0 \ \ I I V=948.0 / v%itJ 3 I PIP \ \ I ! \ 4 TOP- \ \ \\ I I MH t 3 INV -946.0 2 I \ 2 1 I \ 3 6 1 P8 I g 7CP-959.69 1 -DJ722 4 5 1 7 TOP -959.8 2 V=942.3 Z raa; I .5�0� \\\ \ S \ \ I v 2 NOTES 1. All Monitory setter lines Moll be 8 Inch PVC LWOM noted otherwise. 2. All water Imes Moll be 6 Inch ductile Iran unlesM noted otherwies. J. Storm sewer to be RCP or HDPE when outelds of paved areae. 4. Sanitary service Imes shoe be 4 inch PVC. S Water service lines shoe be 1 inch copper. LEGEND DENOTES IRON MONUMENT l..�..,w EXISTING STORM SEWER- DOSTING SANITARY SEWER EXISTING WATERMAIN, HYDRANT, AND VALVE - _--_. r•__.. i`.___.I,.,}-..:�"....___ DQVNG OVERHEAD ELECTRIC LINE - .. . EXISTING UNDERGROUND GAS LINE EXISTING BURIED TETiPHONE LINE .. ... .... .... ..... r PROPOSED STORM SEWER W DIST 1 PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER O. -S y PROPOSED WATERMAIN 8" y 3 PROPOSED HYDRANT h GATE VALVE ♦ - \ 4 \ 5 \ 6i a \ \ \ cwar I - B Ex Nro &vr � \ � ,PP G47F VKM:' �- 95(.66 PP a 589'33'54"W 12224�- . hit Engineering Planning • Su, FRI ,u„ t t Mdombbs Fr" Agofto 16030 2Y6 A- North • P/ynouln Mhneeort Phone 763/476-6010 • lax 76J/4i E-4oZ.- mfroOr Ow OCeno, LLC AmMm, 0 Autumn Ridge akdn. Prellminery Uffi ty Plan I hereby certify that this plan was prepa, me or under my direct supervision and t; I am a duly Licensed Professional Engine under the Ip��vte o 5 ate Minnesat, Sioncture Name David Nash Date 6/17/02 License I 21e. Designed MJG Checked Drawn JLT/JMT Approved Date 6/17/02 No. Date By Remarks VVV NORTH 7 � I 0 25 50 100 200 WM RLE No.: tons PHASE ONE LANDSCAPE LEGEPiu 17. USE ANTI -DESICCANT (MTLTPRUF GR APPROVED EQUAL) ON PESTS ANDDISEASE AND BE CONTAINER GROWN OR BALLED AND CF'BURI.APPED AS INDICATED N THE PLANT UST. BOTANCAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE ROOT OTY. REMARKS ECIDUOUS TREES 3. THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REJECT N75 ICIM ARE DEFIED UNSATISFACTORY BEFORE, DURING ANYPUWHICHA GRAFTER S WR FERTILE FRIABLE LOAM CONTAIWNG A LIBERAL AMOUNT OF HIMUS AAD CAPABLE OF SUSTAINNG VIGOROUS PLANT GROWTH. IT SHALL COOLY WITH MNOOT SPECIFICATION 3877 TME B SELECT TOPSOIL. 4. NO S19S117l1TIOHS OF PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE ACCEPTED cer saecorum 'Green Mountain' GREEN MOUNTAIN SUGAR MAPLE 2.5' BB 8 cer x freeman 'JeHenred IAUTUMN BLAZE MAPLE 3.5• BB 8 roxinus americana 'Autumn Blaze' JF AUTUMN BLAZE ASH 2.5• BB 27 roxinus pennsylvonica 'Summit' SUMMIT ASH 25' BB 5 opulus tremuloides QUAKING ASPEN I• CONT. 29 Pfio cordata LIT1lELEAF LINDEN 2.5- j CONT. 29 I CONIFEROUS TREES 9. ALL PLANTING AREAS MUST BE COMPLETELY MULCHED AS SPECIFIED. AND MAINTAINED LN71L THE INSTALLATION OF PLANTINGS IS 10, MULCH: SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH. CLEAN AND FREE OF Abies bolsonwo BALSAM FIR 6' HT. BB Picea glauea densato BUCK HILLS SPRUCE HT. N7 Pinus strobes WHITE PINE I6' 6' HT. BB 7 ORNAMENTAL TREES 12 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPON981E FOR ALL MULCHES AND PLANTING SOL QUANTITIES TO COMPLETE THE WORN SKIN ON SPEOFIUTICNS. 23. WATERING" MAINTAIN A WAIEFNG SCHEDULE WHICH WILL THE PLAN. VERIFY ALL GUANT111ES SHOWN ON THE PLANT SI]ICOUL Mar gmnalo AMUR MAPLE 6' CONT 88 Mahn 'Red Splendor* RED SPLENDOR CRNBAPPLE 1.5 • Be 1e •d Make 'Spring STOW' SPRING SNOW CRABAPPLE 1.5" BB B SHRUBS 15. THE CONTRACTOR 94ALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLYING MIH ALL APPLICABLE CODES, REGULATIONS AND PERMITS GOVERNING THE WORK. ® Co us rocemow I GRAY QQG!WO 2 CAL CENT 96 O Rhus typhino STAGHORN SUMAC 2 GAL C9NT 42 PLANTING NOTES 1. ALLPUNTS MUST BE HEALTHY. VIGOROUS MATERIAL FREE OF 17. USE ANTI -DESICCANT (MTLTPRUF GR APPROVED EQUAL) ON PESTS ANDDISEASE AND BE CONTAINER GROWN OR BALLED AND CF'BURI.APPED AS INDICATED N THE PLANT UST. DECDOUS PLANTS MOVED N LEAF AND FOR EVERGREENS MOVED ANYTW _ APPLY AS PER MANUFACTURERS INSTRUCTION. ALL 2. ALL TREES MUST SE STRAIGHT TRUNKED AND FULL HEADED AID EVERGREENS SHALL BES WAWD IN THE LATE FALL FOR WINTER PROTECTION DURING WARRANTY PERIOD. MEET ALL REQUIREMENTS SPECIFIED. 1l PLANTING SOL FOR TREES• 94RUBS AND GROUND COVEM 3. THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REJECT N75 ICIM ARE DEFIED UNSATISFACTORY BEFORE, DURING ANYPUWHICHA GRAFTER S WR FERTILE FRIABLE LOAM CONTAIWNG A LIBERAL AMOUNT OF HIMUS AAD CAPABLE OF SUSTAINNG VIGOROUS PLANT GROWTH. IT SHALL COOLY WITH MNOOT SPECIFICATION 3877 TME B SELECT TOPSOIL. 4. NO S19S117l1TIOHS OF PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE ACCEPTED MIXTURE SMALL BE FREE FROM HARCPAOC SUBSOIL. STONES. UNLESS APPROVED N WRITING BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 0E1RCN.S NOXIOUS WEEDS ETC. SGL MIXTURE 9/ALL HAVE A PH BETWEEN 6.1 AND 7.5 AND 10-10-10 FERTILIZER AT THE RATE OF 3 S ALL PLANTING STOCK SHALL CONFORM TO THE 'AMERICAN POUNDS PER NBC'TARO. IN PLANTING BEDS NCORPCRATE THIS MIXTURE THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE BED BY RCITOTIL NG INTO THE TO STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK.' ANSI -Z60. LATEST EDITION. OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION! OF NURSERYMEN, INC. AND SHALL 12' OF SOP.. CONSTITUTE MINIMUM OUALJTY REQUIREMENTS FOR PLANT It. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE GUARANTEED FOR ONE COMPLETE MATERIALS' 6. EXISTING TIKES AND SHRUBS TO REMAIN SHALL BE PROTECTED GROWING SEASON (APRIL I - NOVEMBER T), UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. TIIE GUARANTEE SHALL COVER THE FULL COST OF M THE DRIP UNE FROM ALL CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC. STORAGE OF FEPLACDMENT INCLUDING LABOR AND PLANTS. MATERIALS ETC. WITH 4• HT. ORANGE PLASTIC SAFETY FENCING ADEQUATELY SUPPORTED BY STEEL FENCE POSTS 6' O.C. MAXIMUM SPACING. 20. SEASONS/TME OF PLANTING: NOTE: THE CONTRACTOR MAY ELECT TO PUNT IN OFF-SEASONS ENTIRELY AT HIS/HER RIS(. 7. ALL RANT MATERIALS QIANTITIM SHAPES OF BEDS AND 1 -MOV. 1 DESA POTTED AUG.LOCATIONS APRT. I -JUNE I; 2 21- SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPON98LE FOR COMPLETE COVERAGE OF ALL PLANTING BEDS AT OEODUCIJS B" � MOV' APRT. 1 -NNE T. AUG 2T 1 SPACING SHOWN AND ADJUSTED M CONFORM TO TINE EXACT CONDITIONS OF THE SITE. THE ARCHITECT SHALL APPROVE THE STAKING LOCATION OF ALL PUNT MATERIALS PRIOR TO APRIL PEEN POTTED PLANTS ' APER. 1 -JUNE 1- NJG 21 -OCT. 1 8818- INSTALLATION. APRIL 1 -MAY 13. AUG 21 -SEPT 13 APRIL 8. ALL TREES MUST BE PUNTED, MULCHED. AND STARED AS SHOWN IN THE DETAILS. 21. MAINTENANCE SHALL BEGIN IMEOATELY AFTER EACH PORTION OF THE WORK IS IN PUCE. PUNT MATERIAL SHALL BE PROTECTED 9. ALL PLANTING AREAS MUST BE COMPLETELY MULCHED AS SPECIFIED. AND MAINTAINED LN71L THE INSTALLATION OF PLANTINGS IS 10, MULCH: SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH. CLEAN AND FREE OF C9i1LTF. INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE, AND PUNTING IS ACCEPTED EXCLUSNE OF THE GUARANTEE. MAINTENANCE SHALL NOXIOUS WEEDS OR OTHER DELETERIOUS MATERIAL IN ALL MASS PLANTING BEDS AND FOR TREES• UNLESS INDICATED AS ROCK INCLUDE WATEFUW. QNLTIVArW, MUUC H WG REMOVAL D DEAD MATERIALS, RE -SETTING PLANTS TO PROPER GRADE AND KEEPING MULCH ON DRAWINGS. SUBMIT SAMPLE TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR To OELIVERY ON-SITE FOR APPROVAL DELVER MULCH ON PLANTS IN A PLUMB POSITION. AFTER ACCEPTANCE, THE OWNER STALL ASSUME MAINTENANCE RE5P014BIUTIES. HOWEVER. THE DAY OF INSTALATK)N. USE C FOR TREES• SHRUB BEDS. AND 3' FOR PERERNAL/GROUND COVER BEDS, UNLESS OTHERWISE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTINUE TO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR KEEPING THE TREES PLUMB THHWCNOUT THE GUARANTEE PERIOD. DIRECTED. 22 ANY PUNT MATERIAL YMCA OWES. TURNS BROWN, OR DEFOUATES 11. THE PLAN TAKES PRECEDENCE OVER THE PLANT SCHEDULE IF DISCREPANCES EXIST. THE SPECIFICATIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE (PRIOR TO TOTAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK) SHALL BE PROMPTLY THE SITE AND REPLACED NTH MATERIAL OF TIME SANE REMOVED THE OVER THE PUNTING NOTES AND GENERAL NOTES SPECES QUANTITY. AND SIZE AND MEETING ALL PLANT UST 12 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPON981E FOR ALL MULCHES AND PLANTING SOL QUANTITIES TO COMPLETE THE WORN SKIN ON SPEOFIUTICNS. 23. WATERING" MAINTAIN A WAIEFNG SCHEDULE WHICH WILL THE PLAN. VERIFY ALL GUANT111ES SHOWN ON THE PLANT SI]ICOUL THOROUGHLY WATER ALL PLANTS ONCE A WEEK. IN EXTREMELY HOT, DRY WEATHER. WATER MORE OFTEN AS REQUIRED BY INDICATIONS OF 3. ld1 OC OF MAlE1NALt OR SUPPUCS dN-fTI MOISTURE UNDER M,LTOr$1, Joe 1W 33 TO WAnRRND 10 ORTERRMINVES Km. CONTRACTOR 9NALL TILIMI WILL �It OMRO MAK THE NgCLSWY MRANON?NTS FOR WATER 14. THE CONTRACTOR SMALL KEEP PAVEMENTS, PLANTERS AND 24 CON1RACTOR SHALL REQUEST IN NNTING.A FINAL ACCEPTANCE BUILDINGS CLEAN AND UNSTAINED. ALL PEDESTRIAN AND V674CLE ACCESS TO BE MANTANED THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION PERIOD. ALL WASTES SMALL BE PROMPTLY REMOVED FROM THE STE. ANY ANY INSPECTION. 25. ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE SEEDED. ARE TO RECQVE 4• TOP PLANT STOCK NOT PLANTED ON DAY OF DELIVERY 94ALL BE HEELED N AND WAIEREO UNTIL INSTALLATION. PUNTS NOT MANTANED IN SOL SEED, WLCIt AND WATER UN1L A HEALTHY STAND OF GRASS 15 OBTAINED. THIS MANNER WILL BE REJECTED, ANY DAMAGE TO EXISTING FACILJTYIES SHALL BE REPAVED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S CPENSE. 15. THE CONTRACTOR 94ALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLYING MIH ALL APPLICABLE CODES, REGULATIONS AND PERMITS GOVERNING THE WORK. IS. LOCATE AND VERIFY ALL UTILITIES, INCLUDING IRRIGATION LINES. WITH THE OWNER FOR PROPRIETARY UTILITIES AND GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 454-0002 (TWN CITIES METRO AREA) OR BOO -252-1186 (GREATER MINNESOTA) 48 HOURS BEFORE DUGONG CONTRACTOR SHALL SE RESPONSIBLE FOR ME PROTECTION Ad REPAIROF ANY DAMAGES TO SAME. NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY CONFLICTS TO FACIUTATE PLANT RELOCATION. 1gT'a W.� ��LE�/IppQETLL SPECS �i I, PP 1. pppp qR REFNtON6 PAUN•D O ALL DANS. REM Cin ,I�r OPFDFYL! IIIT SOD L ro UORIN A 1pRER�NIN OF M NOTE" y.,,x • PRIOR "S LMRIATEEIGN PERIOD �pOFpByV1E .BTAItRIC EAIfiM FROM IOP OF BILL � r ,a 1-1 S ND 14 ) TpORINNSURE TAt1pN GIf1 ETES NO N�CLE PAND ro ENA 7p FOR a PERIOD THE pwpRIIE_ 2 STEEL Sr r5C MnNi�DwaisO o.c. 1EP UBO 5 RHTHGE T Gi.OE AS INT a+DRWD SEASONGUY EXTEND MULCH EEIEON WIRE AA'Gcw_WMOE Putt WINE F1E__ ■M �1MAR5'ER!EN�TR(- OGBR�rAWryfCN = ! .3Y�.,� N LASS RANOILS FEEL MULCIM eAa FROM FULL TRUNK. /y POLYET NO YL) 1-iSIfiVO nroE sRFWMNPK I. OOLRE 1207 NEFRYM.S VuvT a LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 4•-W' SHREDDED 1TAHIK MUCH PETBTXPATED AIT PVC CC1M 4 _W SNREmm BINK MAW iyP-r"LS�E1E STM(EIC5e OW AM A A SILT-2•t4•GLE- st a O16TING. CRAM T�1 O �SpL ,Q AFD PRIOR E UNNDE MINIMUM O 4 - PLANTING SOIL OW GRACE � �r IB„p S A STAKES' d! RD/p.( BWUNp lCp OF BSE 8 (SEELSRG) `7 I 97WONC OUQ%il $UTHIAX�SfIRND $11�DWS IRS OR STABIL® SU8SO11LRSFIE N �-Lc �WBG B[ E�PT �HEwR00f B/lJ. R�OOE COU,N. THE O THE PEAI/T ESrAQl51441/T PERIDD, aSFSAgtAND RD`�S gD�K TPp�6.ON.E'OR N IXRdlt ro ro A DEPTH O Y PR,p11 SUNY UFf p� A7 x_11 KW�U5.0TURN EE_ W4M%pNP TETE R0 MD R 10T COLLAR, qA ulfit MC ELE Il' M�CUf MIO r ��' IroOWOi NCE C4•i011Pi AM INTL OND AT ERIE rtTIEM pmppeTE�CUUrJSANo %tAElY _ B�Ac NMeiROYiE W1 E1E sW/L Iqf tI e Tp E WrS'� THE B cRAONB�LE TWNE SIAL NOT BE PERMITRIOR TED. SPL ProlAN1N "N'MENTS '� - CED m DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL Ira4X n CON A iITEROUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL v {air eNX TRIM BROKEN AND DUD TWIGS NOL rWI 1.0 t iFNG�s 01 Y-1• SHREDDED BARN MULCH w SPECIFIED, OR AS SPECIFIED. PULL MULCH MULCH BACK FROM SMEAR. RACE PLAT TO " SAYE RELATIONSHIP TO GRADE AS N PREVIOUS GROWING CONOIFTON. EXISTING GRI 11' ROOTBLLL OR ROOTMASS URLwrr�NT�GBSOLOKMITRRE (SIE SRL) Kir ,V� $TAFItIIEO SUBSOILS gu��Rl)l1� 0 yAND RDDF PEImD.LOOSEN AND TURN ENTIRE DF WtMI sHrWL NaR ' Nlri n ML.°T %A��a�x' vSFeDKt� CSHRUB PLANTING DETAIL ,W M sIAX M13 -din i-10 ��: • � X400 /.,;, �� :,e Lim M ` \ I IWO.. �i I, PP 1. t I SOD L • • t, 1T..- .� I � Y �'•1 0 2550lF 400 SOD y r IWO.. -:PP • • NORTH 0 2550lF 400 Engineering • Planning • Surveying � 1 iRA L - Mecombs Fndt Roos Pmockft Ise. /Baso 2,Yd Averw North • Pry,,lutA Minwto • 55"7 phone 76JI476-6010 • Pox 763/476-8532 E -Moi: mlradlnHacam Rc;C;1 in LIMMH M"Ti Preliminary Landscape Plan I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the I e of t ate M nneeota. Signature C Name David Nosh Date 6/17/02 License # 21535 Designed MJG Checkeo MJG Drawn ODs Approved DVN Date 6/17/02 No. Date By Remarks w" MIUME 7 7 IEII M ME IWW/.. 131 PSI; t ►��,+�-� Earl Smith noted the fee schedule should be established and that they need to work with Community Education and MCC on ballfield scheduling. Presently all the scheduling is being done through Public works. Earl Smith and Rick Traver will be the Parks Commission representatives on the ballfield subcommittee. Because of a previous commitment. John Simola provided an update on the ATV subcommittee. There are many obstacles to getting a route established for ATV's that would allow them to get out of the City limits. The only place you can ride is in the ditch. If an ATV is on the road, it must be a licensed motorized vehicle. Even the DNR is working to find places for ATV use that would not damage the environment. John Simola indicated the city could designate a portion of the street as an ATV trail and mark it then the ATV "s could go on city streets. John Simola didn't feel striping would be feasible. He noted that he was informed that ATV's can cross the freeway at bridges which was new information from previously. John Simola felt the ordinance should stand as it is. John Simola also added as an update to the entrance the signs that there were discussions on providing electric service to the sign at the west entrance to the city. Xcel Energy will submit a cost estimate to the city. 6. Shawn Weinand - Townhome Development Review (Autumn Riche). The Parks Commission reviewed a preliminary sketch of Autumn.. No representative from the developer and no City staff was present to information on the preliminary sketch. The Parks Commission noted that the drawing submitted to them was an undated preliminary landscape plan. The Parks Commission noted the following objections to the plan as submitted: 1) There is no parking near the play area; 2) The play area is too small in size; 3) Proximity of the play area to the Amoco easement; 4) Concerns about drainage and 5) No street access to the play area. The Comprehensive Parks and Pathway Plan requires access from two streets. The Parks Commission felt that cash in lieu of land was desirable for this development. The Parks Commission noted that since this development is self-contained. including private streets, they questioned why the City would want to place a public park there and especially one that did not meet the requirements of the comprehensive plan. Adam Hawkinson felt the trails should be constructed to an 8' width in case the City ends up having to maintain them. 7. Discussion of Rolling Woods Area Park Plans. The Parks Commission discussed having an informational meeting for the residents in the area. Adam Hawkinson indicated that he would like the Parks Commission to meet every other week during the summer and that way hopefully within the next couple of weeks they could schedule a meeting with the Rolling Woods residents. The Parks Commission discussed development plans including the playstructure for the area which would run approximately $8.000. Adam Hawkinson will be getting a spec sheet for the structure. He also noted that the manufacturer's inspector was out to check the playstructure at West Bridge Park but he has not heard back with what the inspector found. He reported on an incident that occurred on the structure and whether the child was of an appropriate age to be on it. Adam Hawkinson stated that if there was an age restriction for use of the structure the manufacturer should be providing signage so noting that. There was also discussion on looking at Council Agenda - 7/22/02 5G. Consideration of approving cooperative agreement with Wright Countv for reconstruction of CSAH 75 from Washington Street to Otter Creek, Proiect No. 2000-16C, State Project SAP 86-675-14. (JS) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The planning of the improvements to CSAH 75 appears to be coming to a close. The plans and specifications have been completed for both the County and City portion and the project is now out for bids. The bid opening for the project is August 6, 2002. The County is expecting to award the project on the same day if the bids are within the budget for the project. The City of Monticello should be ready to do the same so that the work can be started immediately upon signing of the contracts and receipt of insurance and bonds. The agreement which is enclosed for your review is on the County Board agenda for approval on July 30". The agreement itself lays out cost sharing parameters for various portions of the project. For example, the City will be responsible for paying 30% of the final wear course on the paved shoulders or parking lanes only. In addition, we will be responsible for any Class V wasted due to installation of water, sanitary sewer and services. We, of course, are responsible for 100% of all the utility costs. In addition the County pays for 75% of the raised concrete medians and any concrete surfacing done within the median. The signal at County Road 39 and CSAH 75 is split 50-50 as are the improvements to the intersection of State Highway 25 and CSAH 75. Some curbing work and minor storm sewer work will be done in this area. Mobilization and traffic control are split based upon the percentage of costs and engineering services are split. The City pays for 100% of all the engineering done by WSB for our utilities and we pay the County 10% of our share of the cost of the work being done by the County, such as our 25% of the concrete medians, all of the sidewalk and the curbing replacement. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. The first alternative would be to approve the agreement with Wright County for the improvements to CSAH 75 as drafted and enclosed.. Additionally, this alternative would authorize the City Engineer, City Administrator and Public Works Director to attend the bid opening and to proceed with the project should the bids come in within 5%-10% of the cost previously estimated by the City Engineer. 2. The second alternative would be to approve the agreement for improvements to CSAH 75 but to schedule a joint meeting of either the Council as a whole with the County or a subcommittee of the Council with the County Board to make approval of the bids and authorize proceeding with the project on August 6 should bids come in within 5%-10% of the previous estimates. Council Agenda - 7/22/02 �. The third alternative would be not to proceed with the project. C. STAFF IZIECOMMENDATION: It is the recommendation of the City Administrator, Public Works Director and City Engineer that the City Council approve the funding agreement and authorize us to proceed with the project should the bids come in within 5%-10% of previous estimates as outlined in alternative # 1. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of the funding agreement with Wright County for improvements to CSAH 75. AGREEMENT NO. 02-01 WRIGHT COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS FUNDING PARTICIPATION AND CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF WRIGHT and THE CITY OF MONTICELLO For CONSTRUCTION OF IMPROVEMENTS FOR: SAP 86-675-14 CSAH 75 - BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL, AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS July 9, 2002 F:\data\HWY\AGREEMNT\Monticello 7514 agreement.wpd COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into by and between the County of Wright, Minnesota, acting by and through its County Board of Commissioners hereinafter referred to as the "County" and the City of Monticello, Minnesota, acting by and through its City Council, hereinafter referred to as the "City". WITNESS TO: WHEREAS, plans and specifications have been prepared for the improvement of County State Aid Highway 75 (from 600 feet East of Jerry Liefert Drive to Washington Street, approximately 1.9 miles in length), hereinafter referred to as CSAH 75 improvements, and said construction plans are designated as SAP 86-675-14. The project includes, but is not limited to, pavement removal and replacement, turn lane construction, curb replacement, storm drainage construction, sidewalk construction, utility improvements, traffic control signal improvements, raised median "street scape" improvements, and other miscellaneous improvements within the corporate limits of Monticello, and WHEREAS, a Cooperative Agreement between the County and the City outlines the responsibilities and financial commitments for the proposed project. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED AND UNDERSTOOD THAT: Article 1 The County shall construct or cause to be constructed a project meeting state aid standards of pavement rehabilitation including roadway, utility, drainage, traffic control signal installation at Elm Street (CSAR 39) and other miscellaneous improvements upon or along CSAH 75 within the City limits in accordance with the approved plans and specifications as prepared by the County Highway Department, and on file at the office of the County Engineer, and: Article 2 It is agreed that upon completion of and acceptance of the work as to quantity and quality by the County, the County Engineer shall determine the actual amount that the City will reimburse the County in accordance with the following funding participation schedule: 1. CSAH 75 Improvements - SAP 86-675-14: This participation is consistent with Wright County's existing funding policies. The City would be required to obtain any additional permanent R/W, as required to do the work. It is anticipated that additional right-of-way will be needed at the Otter Creek Road/CSAR 75 intersection to accommodate the shift of Otter Creek Road to the west. Temporary right-of-way may be needed for construction purposes & would be the responsibility of the County to obtain. 0 Funding Participation: Countv City Turn lane widening improvements 100% 0% Turf Establishment (not including median areas) 100% 0% Surfacing Travel Lanes (Wear/Non-Wear) 100% 0% Surfacing Paved Shoulders (Wear) 70% 30% Aggregate Base for reconditioning improvements to highway 100%(*A) 0%(*A) New Concrete/Bituminous Walk 0% 100% Curb & Gutter (&Entrance Pour -Backs) 0% 100% Retaining Walls 50% 50% Right -of -Way (Permanent) 0% 100% Permanent Street Lighting (not including traffic signal) 0% 100% Storm Sewer 50% 50% Utility Work (San. Sewer, Water, and Casting Adjustments) 0 %(*B) 100 %(*B) Signing/Striping 100% 0% Landscaped/Raised Concrete Medians 75 %(*C) 25 %(*C) Traffic Control Signal System Construction 50%(*D) 50%(*D) Engineering Services (*E) (*E) Mobilization and Traffic Control (*F) (*F) (*) See Notes 2. NOTES: A. The cost for aggregate base associated with restoring the existing highway section, disturbed due to utility work, will be paid 100% by the City. This will include, but not be limited to, all watermain work on the north side of CSAH 75 from Chestnut Street to Washington Street. B. Watermain, Sanitary Sewer, any Storm Sewer, including all adjustments of castings, will be at 100% City cost. 3 C. The cost for the concrete curb & gutter for the landscaped medians will be paid 75% by the County. Costs for landscaping, trees, etc, that will be located within the landscaped median will be the City's cost. Maintenance of the center landscaped median, upon completion of the project, will be the responsibility of the City. D. The County and City will share in the construction & engineering costs for the traffic control signal at CSAH 75 & CSAH 39 (Elin St.) on a 50/50 basis. This is consistent with the present Wright County Traffic Signal Funding Policy. The County and City will share in the construction cost & engineering costs for the signal modifications at CSAH 75 and TH 25 on a 50/50 basis for the costs not covered by the State. The County will not be responsible for certain maintenance provisions upon completion of a traffic control signal system. Painting, relamping, cleaning of the signal system, street light maintenance, and power costs to operate the signal and street light systems will be the responsibility of the City (refer to Article 6 of this agreement). E. The County will provide engineering services for design, construction, and administration of the project. The County will not participate in any engineering costs incurred by the City that are necessary for the City to assess their portion of the project costs (Feasibility Studies, hearings, legal expenses, etc.). The City will reimburse the County for engineering services for the City's portion of the project that was designed by the County, based upon the following table. The final reimbursement will be computed using the appropriate % below times the City's portion only of the contract construction cost (not including City utility work that plans were completed by the City's consultant engineer). From $ 0 thru $100,000 up to 18% of City's Portion Over 100,000 thru 250,000 up to 13 % of City's Portion Over 250,000 thru 500,000 up to 11 % of City's Portion Over 500,000 thru Indefinite up to 10% of City's Portion F. Mobilization and Traffic Control costs are to be split based on the ratio of County costs versus the entire project costs. G. The County will pay for the initial striping of crosswalks and pavement markings as outlined on the plan. Maintenance of the crosswalk pavement markings, upon completion of the project, will be the responsibility of the City. H. Permanent right-of-way acquisition costs are the responsibility of the City. Temporary right-of- way acquisition costs for any roadway work are the responsibility of the County. Temporary right- of-way acquisition costs for sidewalk/pathway or utility work are the responsibility of the City. The County shall prepare a preliminary estimate of construction cost for the County prepared plans for the project. The City shall prepare a preliminary estimate of construction cost for the City consultant prepared plans for the project. The preliminary cost estimates shall identify both the City's share and County's share of cost for the project based upon this funding agreement. This preliminary construction cost estimate shall be attached to this funding agreement. It is intended that the work outlined above in Article Two is to be done by a contractor on a unit price basis through a contract duly let by the County. At such time as the County awards a contract, the City will prepare a new estimate of the County's share of the construction cost based on the unit prices bid by the County's contractor. A copy of such revised cost estimate will be forwarded to the County Highway Engineer. F1 Article 3 The County will be responsible for all field inspection of materials, quantities, and contractor performance for the work identified in the plan sheets prepared by the County (except sidewalk/pathway work, which is 100% City work). The City shall be responsible for construction staking, inspection of materials, quantities and contractor performance for all utility work & sidewalk/pathway work (water main & sanitary sewer) for which plans were prepared by the City's consultant engineer. The County will monitor the wage rates to insure that the contractors working on the County prepared plans have complied with the wage rates as specified in the contract. The City will monitor and report to the County the wage rates for the sub -contractors performing the utility work on the contract. Article 4 Upon award of the contract, the City's portion of the contract shall be computed based upon the contract unit bid prices. Upon written request from the County the City shall forward to the County, within 30 days of contract award, 50% of their portion of the cost. Upon notice by the County that the contract is 50% complete, the City shall forward an additional 25 % of their portion of the cost. Upon notice by the County that the contract is 75 % complete, the City shall forward an additional 20 % of their portion of the cost, and the remaining 5 % upon completion of the work. Upon final completion of the work the County Engineer will submit a certificate of performance which indicates that the work complies with the plans and specifications. The County Engineer will notify the City of the final amount of the City's share based on the actual quantities used and the funding participation amounts shown in Article Two. The City will be responsible for reimbursing final payment to the County within 30 days of receipt of the final payment request by the County. The County Engineer will provide to the City an as -built plan (ledger sized, 11 " x 17") of the project within six (6) months of the final completion of the project. Article 5 The City shall be responsible for all snow and ice removal on sidewalks and other boulevard/sidewalk/bikepath related maintenance outside the curb or street area. The County shall be responsible for routine snow & ice maintenance within the curb to curb area of the highway. Article 6 The City shall be responsible for providing the necessary electrical energy for the operation of the traffic control signals, and any electrical energy for street lights. In addition, the City shall be responsible for at its cost and expense to (1) relamp the traffic control signals; and (2) clean and paint the traffic control signals and cabinets; (3) provide, at its costs and expense, the maintenance on luminaries; and (4) reimbursiniz the County for maintaininiz the EVP System. (Emitter units may be installed and used only on vehicles responding to an emergency as defined in Minnesota Statutes Chapter 169.01, Subdivision 5 and 169.03.) In the event said EVP System or components are, in the opinion of the County, being misused or the conditions set forth herein are violated, and such misuse or violation continues after receipt by the City of written notice thereof from the County, the County shall remove the EVP System, at the City's expense. Upon completion of the project; it shall be County's responsibility at its cost and expense to (1) maintain the signal controller, (2) determine the appropriate signal timing sequence, (3) provide phone service to the controller for remote servicing, (4) provide for replacement of poles, cabinet etc. if they should be damaged through vehicle collision etc. (major maintenance). (5) Provide maintenance for the EVP system, which costs would be reimbursed by the City of Monticello. Article 7 The City shall indemnify, save and hold harmless the County and all of its agents and employees of any form against any and all claims, demands, actions or causes of action of whatever nature or character arising out of or by reason of the execution or performance of the work provided for herein to be performed by the City. The County shall indemnify, save and hold harmless the City and all of its agents and employees of any form against any and all claims, demands, actions or causes of action of whatever nature or character arising out of or by reason of the execution of performance of the work provided for herein to be performed by the County. 5 Article 8 It is further agreed that any and all full-time employees of the County and all other employees of the County engaged in the performance by any work or services required or provided for herein to be performed by the County shall be considered employees of the County only and not of the City and that any and all claims that may or might arise under Workmen's Compensation Act of the State of Minnesota on behalf of said employees while so engaged and any and all claims made by any third parties as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of said County employees while so engaged on any of the work or services provided to be rendered herein shall be the sole obligation and responsibility of the County. It is further agreed that any and all full-time employees of the City and all other employees of the City engaged in the performance by any work or services required or provided for herein to be performed by the City shall be considered employees of the City only and not of the County and that any and all claims that may or might arise under Workmen's Compensation Act of the State of Minnesota on behalf of said employees while so engaged and any and all claims made by any third parties as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of said City employees which so engaged on any of the work or services provided to be rendered herein shall be the sole obligation and responsibility of the City. Article 9 Before this agreement shall become binding and effective it shall be approved by the City Council of Monticello and it shall also be approved by the County Board and such other officers as law may provide. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF the parties have duly executed this agreement by their duly authorized officers and caused their respective seals to be hereunto affixed. COUNTY OF WRIGHT CITY OF MONTICELLO Recommended for Approval: Recommended for Approval: County Engineer City Engineer, Monticello Chair, County Board Mayor, City of Monticello County Coordinator City Attorney, City of Monticello County Attorney City Administrator, City of Monticello Date Date • Council Agenda - 7//22/02 7. Assessment hearing for Dillard Avenue Pathwav and consideration of award of contract for Gillard Avenue Improvement Proiect No. 2001-10C. (RW) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: At the last meeting, the Council reviewed the bids that were received for the Gillard Avenue Pathway Project that ranged from $60,178 to over $100,000. It was decided by the Council to delay awarding the contract to the low bidder, Sunram Construction, Inc. in the amount of $60,178, until an assessment hearing was held. As you know, the pathway project was requested by some of the residents on Gillard Avenue. Typically pathway improvements are constructed and paid for by the development in which they are located, but since the lots that exist along Gillard Avenue were platted a number of years ago, it would typically be the responsibility of the benefitting property owners to pay or all or a portion of the cost for the pathway. With the project cost being spread over a total of 15 properties this would amount to an assessment for each home of approximately $5,135 at 100% assessment rate. The Council directed staff to notify property owners that the City would consider an assessment of 25% of the project costs or $1,283 each with the understanding that it would be the property owner's responsibility for snow removal maintenance because of the reduced assessment amount. The assessment notice was modified to reflect the 25% assessment rate and each property owner was notified of the Council's intent. After the public hearing is held and comments are received from the affected property owners, the Council can decide whether to proceed with the project as proposed or not award the contract at this time. By holding the public hearing in advance of awarding the contract, the Council will know whether the property owners are acceptable to the assessments being proposed. If the Council receives a lot of opposition to the assessments or the project, the Council can stop the project by not awarding the contract. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Adopt the resolution establishing the assessments for the pathway project at 25% of the construction cost or $1,283 per parcel and awarding of the contract to Sunram Construction, Inc. in the amount of $60,178. 2. Adopt the resolution establishing the assessment at a different percentage rate than 25% and awarding the contract to Sunram Construction, Inc. 3. Do not award the contract for the project at this time. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: If the Council is comfortable with the comments received at the assessment hearing and/or objections Council Agenda - 7//22/02 that may have been noted, it is recommended that the assessment roll be adopted for certification to the County Auditor and that the project contract be awarded to the low bidder, Sunram Construction. As I noted above, if the Council receives a lot of opposition to paying for any of the project costs by the property owners, Council can choose to simply cancel the project if the property owners no longer want the improvement. That was the purpose for holding the special assessment hearing prior to commencing the project. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Resolution Adopting Assessment Letter to affected properties RESOLUTION 2002-43 RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT GILLARD AVENUE PATHWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 2001 -IOC WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for the improvement of Gillard Avenue by the construction of 8' pathway and other appurtenant work. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA: 1. Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefitted by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of ten years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 2003 and shall bear interest at the rate of six (6.5) percent per annum from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31, 2003. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the county auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of this resolution; and he may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the next succeeding year. 4. The clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the county auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the county. Such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Adopted by the Monticello City Council this 22nd day of July, 2002. ATTEST: Roger Belsaas, Mayor Rick Wolfsteller, City Administrator I Fa mi%ii MONTICELLO Re: Dillard Avenue Pathway Assessment Notice Dear Resident: :lttly 10, 2002 Recently the City of Monticello mailed a notice to affected residents along Gillard Avenue informing them of the date and time for the assessment hearing on the pathway proposed to be constructed along Gillard Avenue from 97"' Street to River Forest Drive. Included in the notice was an estimated cost for the improvement which was listed at $5,200 per parcel. The $5,200 figure was the cost if the City assessed 100% of the project costs back to the abutting property owners. The Council at their July 8, 2002 meeting discussed the pathway project and determined that the City would pick up 75% of the cost and only 25% of the cost would be assessed to the property owners. With only 25% of the cost being assessed the cost per parcel comes to $1,284.00. This would be the amount assessed against your property if the Council adopts the assessment roll on July 22, 2002. In their discussion on the pathway project, the Council noted that since this segment of pathway was not on the City's grid system, the city staff would not be clearing snow off the pathway in the winter. If you have any questions on the pathway project or the assessment, please let me know. Yours truly, CIT FMONTICELLO Rick Wolfsteller City Administrator RW/dg Monticello City Hall, 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1, Monticello, MN 55362-8831 • (763) 295-2711 • Fax: (763) 295-4404 Office of Public Works, 909 Golf Course Rd., Monticello, MN 55362 • (763) 295-3170 • Fax: (763) 271-3272 Council Agenda - 7/22/02 8. Public Hearin LY-Cons ideration of a resolution adoptinLy proposed assessment roll for delinquent utility bills and certification of assessment roll to Countv Auditor. (RW) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The City Council is again asked to adopt an assessment roll for utility billing accounts which are delinquent more than 60 days and to certify the assessment roll to the County Auditor for collection on next year's real estate taxes. The delinquent utility accounts that are included with the agenda are accounts that are at least 60 days past due and include all new delinquents from the last time we certified them. In addition to the delinquent amount, the Council also previously approved the establishment of an administrative fee of $50 per account that is added to each delinquent assessment. The amounts shown on the enclosed delinquent utilities list include the additional $50 administration fee for the preparation of the assessment roll. It is recommended that the delinquent accounts be put on an assessment roll for certification at an interest rate of 6% as allowed by state statute. As in the past, if any accounts are paid within 30 days after the adoption of the assessment roll, they can be paid without the additional interest. After 30 days, payments will be charged interest. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: Adopt the assessment roll for the delinquent charges as presented. 2. Based on public hearing input, adjust the assessment roll as required. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATi O N: It is staff recommendation that the Council adopt the assessment roll as presented. All of the accounts are at least 60 days past due and have been given proper notice of this assessment hearing and ample opportunity to pay the accounts in full. All utility accounts were notified that there would be an additional $50 administrative fee attached to each outstanding balance if the account was not paid by 4:30 p.m. on July 9, 2002. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of resolution adopting assessment roll Complete listing of delinquent accounts to be certified. CITY OF MONTICELLO RESOLUTION NO. 2002-42 RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR DELINQUENT UTILITY ACCOUNTS WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for delinquent utility account charges, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA.- Such INNESOTA: Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessments against the parcels named herein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefitted by the assessment levied against it. 2. Such assessment shall be payable in one (1) annual installment payable on or before the first Monday in January 2003 and shall bear interest at the rate of 6 percent per annum from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31, 2003. 3. The owner of the property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the county auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of this resolution. 4. The City Administrator shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment roll to the county auditor to be extended on the proper tax list of the county, and such assessment shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Adopted by the City Council this 22"d day of July, 2002. ATTEST: Roger Belsaas, Mayor Rick Wolfsteller, City Administrator 9 b p H> m-3 H H r r H ro m W d �m(D KD C Co R H w m a) 'ro n (D m n O p M N H 1 p n oKD 3 3 ?7 u, p H o0 o m m E H Pi rt H rD o Q n z 3 3 Q' y n W co (D OD O] O 00 N W Du W aD W CO W 00 J m m m m m m m W ul W 111 Ul U1 iP W W W W W W W W N N N N N N N H H H H O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 -a \ H 0 O (] N �P 4A 14. W W w w W H H H H O N W N N H H O O O O O O O O 0 H O O O O O O O H H H H H O O r H H O N N H m w m w U1 N H H O J m N l0 W W N H O m m m .P W N W O lD J m w m W N 0 W W N O m H W W N m Ui H Ul l0 OD J H Oo 0 \O l0 rP H W W H O l0 J W N H W N Ul Du W lD O J W O] Ul m O W N J l0 OD H Ul N m Vi n O G O .P .P O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N O O U, O O O O O O O O O U1 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o Q o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 J O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 w O O O O \0 rr N Yt Ul O O O O O O O O O O O O O H O O O O O O O O O O O O r H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H r H r H r H r H H H H H r H H r ro Ln w m w 111 m ul N m m U, w w N U, U, U1 ul U, U, U1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U, w U, UI U, u, U, Ui u1 u1 U1 U1 Ln U1 UI U1 U1 U1 U1 U, Ul U1 U1 0 0 0 U1 0 Ul U1 Ui 0 ul 0 Ut 0 U1 0 0 o U, U, U1 H U, U1 U, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 H H 0 u1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W W W w W m W w W W W W m w H N N 0 0 0 O O O O H H H H H H H H H H H r H r H H H H H H r H H H H 0 U1 0 CD 0 n H H H H N 0 w H H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O 0 o O O O O 0 o O O O O O O O O O O O H H H O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 D. O O O O O O O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W W O O H H H 07 H H N W J W N W W W W W W W U1 O O O rP H H H H W w .P .P N P 0 N W W H H H H N .P .P H H W W W U, O H �0 U, O O J H O J iP .P Ul Ul m 0 O W N W w U1 rP O O H O O O O O O O O O O O H O O N N O H N N N O O O O H H O O O O O O O H H O H O O H H H O H t7 3t m J W 0 m N 0 m 0 0 0 m H H H m U1 O O H W O O O W H 0 N O O N m H N W H m 0 0 W H J l0 0 N 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 u, u1 v1 o H o 0 0 o H H o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ro 0 0 ro m H H H R H w w w J m W N H H H N m H U1 U, w to n R H H N N H H H H H H H H r W H 0 H W w w w J J J J N 0 F' iP 0 W w H 0 H H O O N H H O J O N O O N N H O H H H O H O H N O H O N H H H Ul A U1 H w O O N O N H to W co O m H l0 J N O N OD 0] J O W W W W N U1 m m m m �D J W .P O m J U1 l0 W m rP .P .P m m m r 4 m rP N `< x x x n n n n W W x x 4 n x z al SO ro ro x - m m m a ul W r x w W w ro W W W W W W W�d x1 M x1 'd �o -3 q `,d H H `MG U H M x% A PU H H H H LZ CU CJ T� .a M > Y C+7 M M x H H H H m M H H .0 .0 rM ,R1 rM or7xal0o00t rt, tpaam roroxxxxot7z� 00t a C t"'Ll x x c c n n n n W W 3 x .d r C� H [s7 C J H H C ' C t7 b 0 po w w m 0 w w w w to M to [n cn l7 0 u 0 0 m ((D H H O O ;r� > w n x1 x .'b :n xl .ro .o C C C C K x1 z z z w to m w Cy C z z ts7 ,u w w g H -3 [n £££££££ m Ll r r Y w H o C C m m r rr n n C r H to H In z z r r z z H H n n z Z M a3 n n n m£££££�mL-1Mz p'alz 00 �dz£zl££�� , O O d t7 H x x n ul N 3 H ro H b r 4 n ro W H C 3 C r n '9 4 4 G1 £ n tj n :h ro :U G7 4 rn 4 4 G] H x �l d :n Dy n n� 0 H C � Com" ,Toy � '-3 x n r) H C 1 ,7 z H H H> y C Q CC M bl M> C; H H H x1 O n H M M� b7 O O O ;u 4 x z ;U ,u Hz z n kl :a m K x C7 :u to IdC M t7 u t) to x 0 3 ;u x C W z W C� r Y C C H� m z • C 1 q ra Q x G� > t7 x x1 m raz K> -3 n C J -i o a a a z q 7. T� L J H C 1 z Cil K Tl � H H 'o H �i d H >V H c* ' vIKKz00 �m7 <l<mx rcn0 H m m w 0 Hx ralzalwalz r�c�mr7ar10MQt,0 R+ z m r z> 'TJ (n t7 H ro w x x x Sc R+ Dy to C7 Y 13 H Q� \ z H m z t7 > 0 9 N n x H W K 0 O ,Kl C 3 ro H m 0 H 0 x to o 0 o K W z x R r O x w q R' m H x n 4 til 0 1y C o x to Cil t l H ,o O ro m 0 H' 1 z z z xl H w H w x W C R+ x O C (n to H W x (D O H 0 I� r a [ n z r K �3 r M x W x H x W H 3 '-3 H r M X O H Q z '-3 > 0 x r cn x7 n x po r m r r it x C H z W n x t 1 M M> x H SO w d W W z x z C x m t I x m r m H ro m H 0 N z H to C O x T� R z O C Jy cn H v cn H W to n M,< W H M H t 1 x m m z m H H o cn H 'o z H x x Q H �Z z N CJ rh n H z x r x r z H z N r Q x 10 'on R, H m z x �a H [ 7 -3 0 x n t) x 1-7 0 r z w Y C-7 n m O m m w w W cn C7 K r t7 (D r [>•J m Cil x z x x M So > W z w r H t] £ tq cn t1l C R z 7 x H H 13K p H n H z t7 z t0 Z x H 3 x 3 C z x to H R' H -i W ro m M to )>G] n •U M H x 'J r'b z z z zi ;rl x H •J Cn co m in •v H ',rJ H H H > O �b n •0 m ro H r � z x m fn to tr" m n O z c y pl 3 H [] C x £ K W H N N H N H H 0 x H FD I-' w H H 0 0 0 H H n n J U1 0 n .� W W 0 J m w 0 0 0 R'' N m k0 ro m U1 w H W H Ul H F -H O O Q [� H O J O N 0 0 0 W W O H O N O H O N r H O O O H W o Q N O N H n H G C 11 0 .ail 0 10 W OJ O m H �D J r N W O] J O O H O O H O m l0 J K iA 0 m U1 %0 W w 0 C W H W W W W N Ul tl Cn W W W W C. W x x 3 x n n n n o co x x 4 n x Q Q Q n n 01 Ol Ol t'i W W r Q w w ul o Q Q r W W W O H rW ." r H R z Cs] u m PC 0 0 0 0 X Vl Cil Cs] M x H til X X X SCJ Ya 0 Ci 0 H x H T� r'b .b H X '.C1 ti7 Sit X X X H 0 i0 0 X H H H H t7 C7 ;i7 0 0 0 0 C7 tZ)K M tl r H So xf o x O x x x C t7 d z d d C7 t7 0 0 0 C C C C z 4l x C C n n n n H x F< r r C N a b H O H z m N w ul T t � 0 H to [a CI! [] X '7. X to [n Cn Ul Ul W co H �0 w x l7 t7 O N SO xJ �J (D n 9 (D txl 0 H ,'c7 Z Z H H C m C m R, K In n Ca J U1 U1 H H q .3 H H H H O£$£ W Z z z z Cn coCn rn O m z Dl Si ul m m v W H H H H 3 H H 13 13 x C til H H x x H H r to U3 H1 U1 C C til tq C r n n H r C H cn cn to [n Gl T� G] £££ H [�] [� £££ C K K K H3 H N H Z z r C z z H H n z z[ x x 3 x H O z z z x � � K H x ro o r a < b r H w 'D w r m H N H m u H rr w Rl m p J J J 0 A m .j m O H W W N m O w O N to ul U1 01 m m O O] H H N m W O m H H J W J W H m O O O iA .P J J N J N to .P .A O N N .P H O. W O. O. Ul O W m .P J. J W. O. lD W O J m O t7 . . M N m H H N U, l0 W W J W .P Ui to �D 4P O m m W W W m 'P m O JW H W O Ut � M& t0 J mW W m m (D N fl Ul .P O m H W Ul W N m m UI O N W 0 W� U, O M N m U, H P W m . W W J U, J N O N O H O l0 m U1 iA m w W J `< Ci ro O v < Ul n r m N w 0 d O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O OO O O O O O O O O O O O O V1 O O O O O O O O O O O N O O O O G d (D W O O O O O O O O O Cl O O O O0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 O O O O l< ro 0 N N rt R �o O C7 O o 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0 0 0 0 o O Q 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (D a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O 0 0 0 0 "< O ro C � n Dl H N fT O d 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 G C7 (D N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 < n r W m 0 m W U1 Ui m v1 W U1 U1 U1 U1 Ul W U1 U1 ul W W 0 W W U1 ul U1 ul u, m m m UI v1 U1 m ul W U1 0 U,0 W 0 U1 u1 u, O O O O O O O O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 O O O O O O O O O O 0 O O O Al R O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n CD (Q O O O O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O0O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O (D H H r H H H r r r rH H H r r w o r w H r r r r H r r H m r w r H r H H n£ H G) H w N N N O w .P H lD J O J m A .P O Ul m m m J H u1 lO m J rP O O H H w w W m m J H w w H J m N W N \ 0 bl W H m O O O .P IP J J N--] N to A A w N N T H O U, to w O 'O w U, LnN w m rP J \o U1 J W U0 O N w O J m Au C rt rl P pu co N m H H N U1 to W W J w A U, A A �o lD A O m m W Ul to m iA m O J m H co O .P w to 1P O .P to J w �o w m m CQ R H U, .C. O w H W ul w N w m w O N ul 0 w iD ul O w N m w H W m rP W W J U1 J N O N O H O �0 m Ul �o w W W J (D (D H n SO O J r 0 W W W W W W w W W W N H H H H r H H H H H H a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 �0 70 l0 l0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o H 0 O O o o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o C 0 0 0 o O n N N N H H H H H H 0 0 0 l0 10 l0 J J U1 Ul W W N N m Ul Ul W W W W W W W N N N H r H H N H H r H H 0 n J m m m l0 O O U'1 H H W O .A 'P .P H H O O J 0 H O 70 �o l0 W N H O J0 H J J J Ul H l0 to W W J O O W w H J W to �P IP m J O w W w rP O \o to m H O lD m O W J iP O N J N m .J O N J Ul O \D N m N �D wJ C O O o 0 0 0 o O o O o O o 0 0 0 0 0 O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O 0 o o o o in o 0 0 0 o o O o 0 D 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 O O O o O O O O O O O O O o O O O O O 0 O O O O O 0 O O o O O 0 R •• O O O o O O O O 0 O O O O O o O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N O O O O O O H O O O O O O O O 0 w O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O o O O O O N O o O O O O O O Ul kor H H r H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H r M H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H ul Ul Ul ul ul Ul w w w w ul w m ul m w w m w ul w w w ui w Ui w ul w Ul w m N w ul w m w Ul Ul m ul Ln ul Ul U1 Ln H 0 Ul H U7 Ul H Ul H 0 Ul Ul N 0 0 0 Ul Ul 0 0 0 0 Ul U7 Ul Ul 0 Ul Ul Ui Ul 0 0 0 Ul C 0 Ul H UI U1 ul ul 0 Ul 0 0 0 d O O H H H H H H O o 0 O O O O O O O O O a H H H H O H H r H O O O O O O H H H H 0 O O O O O o W W o o O O O O W m O W W W to J W W W Ln -P O r N N W 0 0 0 0 W W W m m W H H O 0 0 W W W W W W ik W W W W W W W W W l0 O O O O J O o 0 0 0 0 W 0 m m 01 J J J J m m m H H m H H 0 l0 O W W W W W O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O o O O O O WO o O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O o O O o O O o O O O O O O a o O N H H H W W m W A m W W H N m NW H W N UNN N N N N H W w P. N H N N H C) H O O O O O O A r O O H o 0 O O O O H O 0 O O OH 0 H H O O O O 0 O H C 0 C O H ur O m N H J C N W H m m W W W J H m N O N W l0 0 N W J Ul N F, H H J O O O O O O O 0 C O O w O O O O O O O O 0 O O 0 O O O O O O O O O 0 O O O O O O O N 0 O O 0 O O ro 0 0 10m .n .n .n �n �n in .n in in In u N nl N N N N N N N N N m lD lD m m m m m m m m 10 �D m to \0 �o m h' l< 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 to x 0 0 0 W W 0 0 0 xu 3 m O m m 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 0 a m 3 3 3 m w m m ni hl 11 x Dy 0 0 ;V 'O 'd 'O '.l7 'M q Ca >> �U ,U b> SJ M[ f� > 0 H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H r Jy T� ✓ l n n H l -q H H H l-1 r Dy Ln x x x H H x x x C7 T� cn 'o C C r r r r r r r r r r C r r r C 3 Gl n H H H xx000000r'xrc CvDyCcc al LnmrrrrrrrrrrL�rrrL� rrxal�ro n O O z z Dy £ O K :ll xl ;D r"d :n :v :n 10 :a :o H H H rn 4] G] 0 zt J £ U£ 0 0£££ x 0 'tel 'I C q C C q b d ;v m ;;vv Ht -4H K K K H co W W r r r r r r Q z 0 Jy p o 0 n O 0 H z z Z z Z z z ?� Y H H z z z z z z r G] n m r x x r r r n> H�d Ru b p r H H H 0 .o yi1 l7 CJ C7 ;u z z z 0- '-3 z m t 7 z z z H x r x t 7 m x Ro x x N x x D C C r r r r 0 l xl W d d ro co d cn co W z (n co d CJ b d b t7 C7 Cl [n [n m zroy brdrW z CJ t7 CZiIzmzzz zz 4 xl W ,O > y x cn W M x 0 W x 3 n cn W 4 ;'0 W p x :O 3 C4 d d£ r O m ;v O H H O C H x 4 T� :� x [�J .� O r K Jy x 0 Cs] ;Ib x 0 ✓y Dy '� H Dy 0 0 Y t 7 C H Dy Dy 0 H H alo nnr7xxalwe�xaloxH�l(�LaW�HrzDyWHCrDy£xalL�nrnWdxcmxnczrz 3 z H z n [+l d z mTa K K C x 0 Cil z Liz D4 m z K r cn p+ 3 3> z K[ 1 1l z z u nl Tu z q �J H z 0 to r R+ ro z R+ r W n R� K T� R+ x7 u'' H x CJ (n £ W H K H T� .ro £ O m r C m L] O z '] cn R7 m O R+ C7 " z T11 cn n H m C7 n R, H C H RSt+ 3£ xnzxzd0 t4 xa�wnLm 010ExnrnyxxHSormcHmcrExr�°zm�H 'n 1y O H z W H H o K Ln O O r r n[a t�7 C J x t l x L J 3[ J L i u z 3 O 11 M cn H r Jy H z a W z x T� xl W co C O C7 H r z r H t ro t xl co x z r 3 to n m Jy '-3 w w n M n '-3 m H '-3 3 a u 3 r HL 7 n �3 3t-- r W O O [n cn O x n7 z x 1y K x O H x o rn Lel b z x£ H r r z x z ry x £ La z z (n 7. n n C > m m L-1 ro b cn 3 Pl y ,u En H z Jy r r H z •0 cn z z W [+l £ 3 Cil z z x o r ro 3 W )� N [ 7 •v O n Cn m C/)J ccnn x0 tr3J 3 X z z tt" 0 to to ra 3 lD 'V l0 �o w 70 w w Ul Ul H N N N N N N N N N N N m to �o m m m m m m m m ID W' m lD to H m — H H W N ro H N H O H N .A .P gP Ul H O J J m w w J J J W m Ul Ul Ul m H H H N N H H O Ul m N ul w .P w M O W rP m 0 W m W Ul P W H O O m H O m W J J W m m N W H W W N H W W W O H AP N lD w ui J l0 to N W M A O O MD %,0 W H m m O o O 0 H N N W H H N O J H .P J W J W J W �D O N H .a H� In Z '11 W x 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 w x 0 0 o W W 0 0 0 Sa 3 m O m m 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 G1 4] ,Tl 3 3 Dy G� 4l H H X Dy O O M 'O M 'U xl 'd > H C-1 Y> P .ro /O > ✓7 > M W> W H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H 1A H C r r rro 'N n n H H H H H H r m x x x H H x x x d w ro C C C r C' r r r r r r r C C" r w x 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 t" $O r C C Dy C C C C7 SD Ch pl r r r r r r r r r r Cn r r,Kl LTl C D7 W H H r r r r r r> r r H ',t7 H ,'t7 ,rJ H H H o o Li ri) fcl > n n K K W m m '-3 H H H H Ln n 4l n C7 z C ] £ 0 £ O O £ £ - • x O nl 'TJ C q C qq [[ C W W r r r r r r 0 11a 0 >> O 0 n 0 0 HHzzzzzzr c�nLarxxrrrn� Hxz DybrHHc�o m xd z d - '-3 Z C9 [>;l z z `G rro ,b 7D .'U ,'a O u :D cn u (nu) W z w r z H d CJ d d d CJ d CJ to tJ l7 r r t, to z z T� r z t7 C7 LzTI xl z z Q z n ro o w < � n w in ni o (n of vl un 6i ul r: w N o! in P N w in , w N W m m m o J 0 m J w w r J m Ln r O r M M A �D CJ O W r Lnw H O H W m J o %D w m cn co w H H m W Ln W o 0 w iO �O w ID P l m cn m oW w 'w J w J w *O �n H m (D Pl ,r4O Ul co m W l0 JA W Ul m Ul H N J W o N W W co .•.1 H w �P N O N ul N W 0 0 Ln H W N O A N W w O It, N N ro ° N C C7 t R m 0 N N N H GG . . O O a O O O o O ul O O O O O O O O O O O O O O H J O 0 o O O O O A O O O O O O 0 H O O 0 O o 0 (D P1 O O O O O O O O N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 'P m O O O O O a O N O O O O O O O lP 0 0 0 0 0 0 ro 0 m C rn n R 0 0 C7 C 0 0 o 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o 0 o 0 o o 0 0 0 o O O 0 0 o O o 0 O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a O 0 0 0 0 (D W 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 0 a O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 l< O ro C w n (n H R N O b C t7 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O OO O O O O O O O O O 0 O O O O O O 0 O O O O O O (D Al O CC 00 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 CC 0 0 OCOOCO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '< n r m m w m w m Ul w m w Ul o m m m ul w m Ul w Ul ul m m ul m ul m w m Ul m ul m m m ui m Ul N Uiui Ul ul Ul ul Ul '.y G 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o N R n (D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a O 0 0 0 0 O o 0 0 0 o O 0 O o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 cQ 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 O o 0 O o 0 o a O o O o O o 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 O o (D w � r H H H H H H H H N H H H r H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H N H H n E 13 Q O m O W .P m WU1 N O" N m 19, O H J O H O W N m W \o m O N W J H H H H N0 w l0 N H N N �\ O m W Ln N O N m m ul N ul Ln H W N O to rP ul .1 H W Ul A J W W W m m O J Ul J J 'D In H J m Ul N O H Ul co 'P 'D (U C R K P P lD H ul W /H O H w H ..] O �o W m Ul W W H H m W Ul W H W w \D �o W w '? J O ul m O W w w J iA J W �D �P H m LO R H rP O Ul W m W ko J m w (n m Ln H N J w O N W 70 co J w 0 A N O N Ul N W N O ul H w N 0 .A m W 0 O .P N N (D (D N n H K 0 �J 3 O z H M C r 0 n H � H 5O O13 z 4>D> H a r r 0 y J In w W W W W W O O y 'f O O O O 0 (D 0 0 0 O 0 O O 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O .1 01 w of H H H H H H 0 0 0 0 LP A W W N N H H H H H H H H W W W N N N H Ut N W N N N H O N H H H Ut W N 0 0 W 'l J Ul N 0 rP W lP (Ii O OD J T 0 N n O r m H N W 0 0 W N 0 0 0 CP tD C) W 111 N O N W 01 0 N H 0 0 O 0 w O N 0 0 0 0� N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O o o O O O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 O 0 O 0 O O O O 0 O 0 O O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O r O r D R •• N YL In W O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H ro t0 U1 m W W W m m W Ln In m Ul 0 W Vl In Ul In W In 111 W W m W W In W W m W W W Ln Ln lJ1 In H Ul V, H H H H H Ul H H H lit H lit H 0 0 (D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 In 0 In 0 CD H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H O O O O O O o O O O O 0 O O O 0 W N N N H N N N N N H H N N O O o o t0 to t4 t0 t0 to l0 l0 l0 l0 Ol Ol OD 0- W W N Ut 0 0 0 N N N N N 0 0 w W 0 0 N 0 O O Ol O O Ol Ol 0 O O l0 10 W W N CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o o O o 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o o 0 0 0 Dl 0 0 0 0 0 iP O w N .P N H H Ul N N Ul H W W N" N H H H H N W CP N O O O O 0 O H N H O O H O O O O H H O O O O O O O O O N0 0 t. O O O O O H b � H rP N N N W 0 0 H ..l H 0 0 In 0 0 0 0 Ol 0 O N 0 0 W H H 0 N W 01 iP 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ro ti 0 10H o to w In W co W 00 W co H Ol m W to lD H t0 A iA iP rP W M M to to to Ut Ul A Ln to O t0 t0 w W Ol 01 W Ct W H H N w O H H O F1 0 ul J v W 0l of .P W O O Ut U, m N O ui N t0 co 0 0 N o H w w W uP lP H O 111 rP to O N W N W �P N W F- K R A m H Ol W O 41 O N Ol � W t0 H �t t0 O Ul W W .P W .A J W lD Ul O O rP W U'1 H H O H O m m m H 'u cn to E H a a a a E toH 'n 'TJ n'] m 'n x 'n 'n x x x M xt 3 'n 'n m 10Jy Z>�> H ;u � ro M Pd H H> x�> O H y y O > > 0 0 0 t J w> > > a m z m C M r 0 0 0 0 o r r x o xU SO t~ en x M 3�O ;0 3 3 3 1 7 0 M M r rC A� ¢ En x> x d K K K K K CJ d x K 3 3 z C 3 3 LTJ 3 3 m m tl a H n n :o H r m ro z ro O 33 3 3 3 0 0 Z x a H m n H a a a H a H H O O z Z Z Z H ni m 0 r T, r O O O Jy w m K ;n w m m m C J m LTJ m n n z 'L to 0p x4 uzza�za�dvmx�� ao GJymGt7 deddd xxcc r x n to0000 en [� E a(-- C d c E z C c a r r en en 0 z b c > w en en w w>> W Y E en C7 t7 t7 t7 d o t7 b z z x x1 t7 m b K H H H a H K K H C C n :n m M x ;t1 H ;o ;u x KJ can LaJ LHn Lan en m �J z z z �d z � ro H KD a Z x r ✓y 4 r 4 4 r a 4 3 Z> M x 4n 4 d a v m d 47 b x d d ro 3� 7D x 4 :a z a p O >T� to T� H Cn M n v G ?� T� 3 [n0 b m H x >m en > 3 H H K Y [7 axzK�Dzmm0o'vpxl<0xz< >tjtnl< macs �znH"i "n z x Z LTJ x a 'n m H R a .'d C H r en H x m H o Z 3 n 0 x H Ll n C m m r 3 z m CEJT� x 3 n x R x DJ H t J to d K M K 0 r 3+ x0 3 m PO K H r H R' n z x 0 w m Y R' 4 m E R R+ Z Z Ctl o G�j uG n (D o x a co > r m 'n H 0 3 0 N o bJ Ti Cn O H z 3 m O to R+ 'n 3 x Ln z W 3 v dJ H a z 3 z u bJ n Sa z r> m�v > 3 ro m ro b m 3 Co z y C Z xHen rmnHHln r3 > 0WHxHzaro0z0m mm w d 0> M 0 W 0 H y z z v z K v z z K Z m a x H z m 6 H--.9 m (D r x 3 m [n W r o n z z en n r O r m LTJ a n E ou > i0 C K r m uO O m til�,�]y xf H tGt-I C4 (n m W x z rn H "' K m O DI H k z z uzi m H to w tD m W m W W W m m m W t0 to l0 to .P A J, A iP t0 4, 4 w LD w m m w w w O W W to w 0\ .] W �1 W H H N A O H H O -,t J M J a W 0\ dl 44 W 0 O Ut A A N n H r O m N l0 LD 00 m o O N O H w w m A lit S H O Ul lP to O OD W N .P W A N W m H w w P w to lP O O A W Ln H H O H O to r R H O w O m O N m 00 tD H J t0 O Ut W jP •1 0, z y P o H> b 0> 11 10 £ am au H H 0 0 0 �> ;coal H C e pa LMTJ w 'm -i w z 'o c r O o 0 0 o e" r x o .ro io a m xJ ;a 3 :D :h 3 3 3 t7 l7 :D ,ro r r Jy r $zD n rro Z x x d K K K K K d b x K 3 3 z C 3 3 [n 3 3 to [n to H a n n ;o H (D en m z E_£ E [n m m a d m in m m m m m m R7 h7 H H o 0 C n ro ro o o z 3 3 3 3 0 o Z 3 '-3 H x n a a a a H '-3 H a 0 0 Z Z z Z H� � N y �a r r0 v >> >o O > M M K ro W m en W LTJ en en en n n z O> x y 0 :o :a x m ;D 0 0 mpo y � m> p bb > Jy > bb > x x OU> rJ H n i0 to i0 i0 d T• m u 0 0 0 0 0 'o ;rl C C r 0 n i0 H 10 x [n E C C a Cl- C E E C C H r r m [n u z n > m men 0 C7 0 n O 0 z z M d d m d K H a H a H K K a C C n xJ D u v H PO xa H b ;[1 Can can CTHJ lTal LaTJ M M LTJ x1 O z r r r tJ r d z z z z z x m E H H x ro o r H V) n 'A H H R W to to N N N H ollA F l W Ut lP Ol lil H N N A W H W W W Ol m N J A -J Ol W W A W N J-3 C) W W H .P H. H. H N. .P H W W J J W N H �P J J N �P �P W Ol W J O O O d L9 . . . N W W O w P H W d\ to W Ol H Ol O to JH Ul H H W O O 0 W Ol l0 Ql Dl �1 0 x (D Dl �P lm W W dl t0 m W Ul -1 w w of .A W w w N _1 W w N0 O W 10 N J O W WP N N "< M ro o w < En n R al H m H N 0 d Ul O O O O O0 O O O O O O O -11O O O O O O O O O N O O O O O O O O O O O (D 111 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O W O O O O O O O O O t0 O O O O O O O O O O `< ro o N C to K R LD O b O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O C (D W O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O '< O ro C EO N m H R N O d 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C:) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (D C7 (D N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 't m O O lJt 0 0 In 0 lP 0 0 0 Ul 0 0 0 0 0 Ut 0 0 Ul 0 0 0 0 N 0 m N 0 0 0 0 Ul N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O w QI Al R 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O D LO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o m N o ro W FP H H H H H H H H HW H H H H H H H H H H H H H O W O O H O D1 J J t0 O N to W H N" N t0 O H W W N N N l0 t0 n£ a M 0Cn O \ H W H rP H. H. . . H N d> .P O H W W. . . N H .P ID J N �P rP W m Q\ 00 J O O w 0 A/ r R rj pl Al O .P N Co W O W JP H 00 M t0 W M H H O t0 J H --1 t0 iP Ln H .P W O O W 00 M to Ol M v Ol W(3" W m W W -t W w m iP w H tD N J W W N O o W w N -.) O W M �P N N of W W R H (D (D W Council Agenda - 7/22/02 9. Consideration of accepting bids and awarding the contract for the Front Street Improvement Proiect No. 2001-06C. (WSB) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: On Friday, July 19"' bids were opened on the proposed reconstruction of street and utilities for Front Street between Walnut Street and Locust Street. A total of 3 bids were received with the apparent low bidder being Schluender Construction with a bid of $197,987.80. The engineer's cost estimate was $180,000. The bids will be checked and a final bid tabulation will be provided at the meeting. CONTRACTOR Schluender Construction Buffalo Bituminous IDave Perkins Contracting, Inc. TOTAL BASE BID $197,987.80 $252,782.15 1 $264,884.25 The feasibility report for the project was completed in April, 2001 prior to the completion of the proposed development plan. Since April of 2001 there have been various alterations and additions that have increased the construction cost significantly. A discussion of those items is as follows: • 42" Apron Repair - $6,950 - This is an existing storm sewer that needs to be repaired just north of Walnut Street. • Bike Path - $4,920 - In anticipation of the future bike path along the north curb line, this item was bid as an alternate. • Alley Storm Sewer - $11,250 - This item should be charged to the developer. This is storm sewer to serve the alley and the rear yard area south of the project. • Bike Path Grading - $11,250 - This is the clearing of trees and grading to allow for the proposed bike path. • Street Subgrade Correction - $17,500 - This item was not in the feasibility report because soil borings had not been taken at the time. This item is estimated and may not be this amount depending on what is discovered during construction. In addition to the above items, there is approximately $32,000 of increased costs or added item with the bid as compared with the feasibility report. Some of this is related to the fact that the bids were received 15 months after the feasibility report and some of it is related to the size and complexity of the project. The grading for the Hans Hagen Front Street Townhome project is nearing completion. This project is necessary to provide sanitary sewer and water main service to the property. It is my understanding that the City is obligated to provide service to the site in the near future. Considering the time of year and the bidding climate, it is unlikely that better bids would be received if these bids were rejected. If the project could wait, the price could possibly be reduced by combining this project with another. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Adopt a resolution awarding the bid to Schluender Construction in the amount of $197,987.80 for the improvements to Front Street, Project No. 2001-06C. 2. Do not accept the bids. 3 . Other C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Since there is a time constraint with the developer on this project, the City may have no recourse other than to award the bid. It is uncertain whether rebidding the project will result in a lower amount. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Bid tabulation from WSB & Associates to be presented at meeting. City Council Agenda - 07/22/02 10. Consideration of Development Stage Planned Unit Development Approval and Consideration of Approval of the Preliminary and Final Plat of the Maiestic Heights. residential subdivision. (JO) REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND, City Council is asked to consider granting approval to the Development Stage PUD, Preliminary Plat and Final Plat of the Majestic Heights. The Planning Commission will be providing a recommendation on this project after completion of a special meeting immediately prior to the City Council meeting. At the previous meeting of the Planning Commission there was general consensus that the redevelopment project will result in a net benefit to the area and to the City. However, final plans for the homes were not quite complete and therefore a final recommendation could not be made to the City Council. The main question pertains to the basic style of the homes. The concept PUD was approved based on a rambler home style. Subsequent to the original PUD approval following Rambler design, the developer (CMHP) presented an option for construction of a split level style home and removal of irrigation and landscaping. The Planning Commission considered the concepts at the meeting but tabled the matter and directed the developer to work with staff in developing a home style that would work within the confines of the site and result in a project that meets or exceeds the project contemplated under the original concept PUD approval. After further discussion with the developer at staff level and after an examination of the project budget, it has been determined that the rambler style home is best suited for this site and the cost could be kept within budget. With regard to the name of the development, Shari Harris at CMHP has indicated that the name may be changed at the City's discretion. Does anyone have a better name than Majestic Heights? Please see the attached agenda item from the previous Planning Commission meeting for more information on the project. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS 1. Motion to grant development stage PUD approval allowing 11 single family detached townhomes, along with approval of the preliminary and final plat. Motion based on the finding that the redevelopment project development under the PUD requirements is consistent with the character of the neighborhood, consistent with the comprehensive plan and will not result in a depreciation of adjoining land values. Motion to approve subject to the following conditions. A. Establishment of home owners association or other format for assuring City Council Agenda - 07/22/02 long term maintenance of the PUD. The association or agreement/covenants must include the following items. • Snow removal. • Mowing of common areas and maintenance of landscaping. • Parking stalls, drive maintenance. • Regulations governing fences, storage buildings. • Maintenance of exterior of building. B. Required use of pre -finished siding. C. Completion of all site improvements and home improvements as identified in the approved plans. D. Landscaped plantings and/or screening fence to be provided along the western boundary of the site along with installation of landscaped plantings as shown in the attached supporting documentation. E. Landscaping plan should include installation of an irrigation system. F. Side yard lot lines to follow a building wall thus giving all side yard space to the homeowner opposite of the building wall (included in latest plat update). G. Approval of grading and drainage plans by the City Engineer. H. Curb and gutter included with the alley. I. Removal of existing driveways. J. No accessory buildings. 2. Motion to deny development stage PUD approval along with denial of the preliminary and final plat. Council should select this alternative if it does not agree with the finding noted under alternative 1. Under this option the City would likely need to buy the property from the CMHP and organize development of a different type of development. 2 City Council Agenda - 07/22/02 STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends alternative 1. We believe that the first priority for the project is that it is developed in a manner that will make it an asset to the community and the neighborhood. If the conditions are followed as noted above it is our view that the project will be a success. If the developer is unable to meet the conditions noted under alternative 1, then a different development pattern should be explored. SUPPORTING DATA Home style information. Agenda from Previous Planning Commission Meeting. 3 Lic. 0 0002599 AACN/TEC'ER TSgN�s,� IDEAS C&INP .� Allhti�eEoOpMENT I � ,iAI st and • s o • o oa ak CC-? • es Veil tila basebo net .tea V�opr and an Mirr°r a lose I nasi • • tan and toy, t she/vo ng . Main Mainte dscap el bars ng tenant Qe Hance• fr, ed yard e -free vi tal fast • ee vin / . .Fro vin win �a and s y S,din n� ent doss with g Steel door 'th Lo Panal Ove��`I Sun � E insu • 2 �, e avec rheaa burst lateC D o Xterior drwewa o ®u °tio outs: wa// con .Y 0 tsiae GF de wat struco • pp/ian r°.%ac I elect • er fauc ®� ces: ke k . Te rival pl ets e more • l ephon �°g�'n ; • Ci l e�tric d�shwashe�ack bs°n 9 � range er� r • Neat 2� etc • &hoot efnge,� . p • Fje �ecove gent F�o?��®� Paceo ctric �v ry vent// n,. concre� ater beater ZF ter ation Walls R I N Q m i,I- r I I C t '_L' 1" j,_ I_ . I - — � ❑ ❑ _ - I I 1 1 � I , I I I 1 I I ---- ------ --------------------------------------------------------------- --------------- SIDE ELEVATION 0,431SCALE:. 1/8" . I'-0" I _I _I-I11r_I-�I I I L iIItl�l�-I_ I f-I1�1�1�1� , II I I I I 1 I_ l I I I I i I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I iffiii I l i i l i I I I 11 I I L I"", 1 1 _ i I 1 i I I I r–L— ------------------------- _ SIDE ELEVATION A3.1 SCALE:. 1/8" . I'-0" I ------- -------- _________________lam I I 1 1 1 all' i 1 ' � I I I � ' � I � I I ' 1 I rJ_________________________________________________________________________L�_� I _____________________________________________________________________L _____________I OBACK ELEVATION A3.1 SCALE: = 1/8" = I'_0" ASFI-IALT SHIN, VINYL SNAKES VINYL SIDING 50LDIER CCURSE–� BRICK 1 1 I I 1 1 I I I I I I 1 1 I 1 I I �J______________________________________________ ' 1 L----' -----------------------------------------------L ------------------------------ ------------ 4 1 FRONT ELEVATION A3.1 SCALE: REVISIONS I DATE J N 0 9) 0 U JOB U 22081 0—` DRAWN CHECKED U 0 E DPM Q) m Q)U c DATE SCALE 01-18-02 AS SHOWN w p v p DWCs, � it w E _q E m � m � S) � � w = 11) m i cu �3 U � p 9 3 w S CoQ) Q) J_- z Q Q O C`1 O z z n0 z � O � U w t U p� z O Q 0 � u O �0') 0 cV 00 L N W " Zw U z cl�m JOB 22081 DRAWN CHECKED DPM DATE SCALE 01-18-02 AS SHOWN DWCs, � Y - (Yl R 0 0 7 43.1 3 ACCE55 DOOR OVER OPENIWG \ / o ACCESS _____________________' 4-0" X 4'-0" rl \` :'i, r i - . y••:�' BEDROOM -2 BAT41O Oi O 0KITCHEN \ r 1 10'-6' X 9'6" I 5 I X 12'-0" &'-0" X II' -0" \ r 1 DINING ROOM NIC ! — _ ,•I , �•* ; i t ; i i COVERED ............. 6 X Il -0 • <-...... 1 - is I 1 a r , ' 4 W m r GARAGE ' n i `\ I 14'-0" x ZI'•O' LINEN _INET! ' vy!-/� vy w. CPT- - .IF"YL. CPT.' '. I I I j it r \ r a \ 1...... ... .._�- ................ t1 .............. `.....___........ -.. �i r. 1 _ V.:------------------------- r --- - -------------------- - ....: i I LAUNDRY 5'-0" X II' -0' LIVING ROOM MASTER BEDROOM 16'-0" X X II' -0' NIG � � I P4710 10'-0" X IO' -0" I NIG ISI I 43.I i 1 MAIN FLOOR PLAN AI,I SCALE: 1/8" I'-00" 1008 SQ, FT. (> 2 9 0 UNEXCAVATED ACCESS 4'-O" X 4'-0" A3.1 3 60'0" I A3.1 02 } CRAWL SPACE PLAN 0 ALI/1 SCALE: 1/8" _ ,•-0�I 008 SG. FT. dSUI'9P PAIL O FURN, AIR E)ccu. REVISIONS DATE J v v(YJ O w I? O O J O N CC) ' . A 1 1 9 N n z U� LU Lu L12� IL y Lu 4a A3.1 D m JOB 22081 DRAWNCHECKED DPM DATE SCALE 0-1-18_02 AS SHOWN ALI DWG. Planning Commission Agenda - 07/02/02 6. Public Hearing: Consideration of development stage planned unit development and preliminary plat approval allowing 11 single familv residential units in the R-3 zoning district. Applicant: Central Minnesota Housing Partnership (CMHP) and the City of Monticello. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND CMHP has acquired all of the blighted parcels on the block, prepared development stage plans and now requests development stage approval from the Planning Commission and City Council. The development features 11 1008 square foot single family detached Townhomes. Nine face Minnesota Street and 2 face 6" street. Access to garages is provided via a one way alley in the back. Staff was informed that the developer is considering adding basements to the structures which would enhance the project significantly. More information on this possibility to be provided at the meeting. Site density is low for an R-3 district but relatively dense for a single family project. The density is mitigated by extensive landscaping around structures. Sunny Fresh will be contributing at least $60,000 to the project along with providing labor for installation of landscaping. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS 1. Motion to approve preliminary plat and development stage PUD allowing 11 single family homes (or 9 SF and one two family) in the R-3 district. Motion based on the finding that the proposed plan is consistent with the comprehensive plan, consistent with the character of the neighborhood, and will not result in a depreciation in adjoining land values. Approval subject to conditions the conditions noted. Following are suggested conditions of approval. 1. Landscaped plantings and/or screening fence to be provided along the western boundary of the site along with installation of landscaped plantings as shown in the attached supporting documentation. Landscaping plan should include installation of an irrigation system. 2. Side yard lot lines to follow a building wall thus giving all side yard space to the homeowner opposite of the building wall. lo C-0 Planning Commission Agenda - 07/02/02 J. Lots 11 and 10 should be merged to allow for two attached townhomes. After considerable review, staff believes that this area is too narrow to support two detached townhomes. The additional space created by merging the homes should be used to increase the side yard setback to the west. 4. A set of Architectural plans should be provided showing home detail. Home details should include 6/12 roof pitch, bay window in living room, brick accents, additional ornamentation as desired by the Planning Commission (Architectural Plans to be provided at the meeting). 5. An Association or other joint home owner agreement must be formed to assure maintenance of lawn and drive areas. It should also include a required contribution toward maintenance of the exterior of the homes. 6. Approval of grading and drainage plan by the City Engineer. 7. Curb and gutter included with the alley. 8. Removal of existing driveways. STAFF RECOMMENDATION City staff recommends approval but acknowledges that this development represents an experiment in developing smaller detached townhomes. in a relatively tight setting. This project removes 4 blighted homes and will result in 11 owner occupied units at a price that is affordable to a segment of the population that would not otherwise be able to purchase a home. Based on the experience of the City Planner, it is our view that the design of the homes, rich landscaping, and required common maintenance of grounds will give the development a sense of quality and preserve value in the long term. SUPPORTING DATA Preliminary Plat Concept plan Landscape plan - per unit Draft architectural design Architectural plans and report on inclusion of basements to be provided at the meeting. M PRELIMINARY PLAT OF MAJESTIC HEIGHTS t 1.26 ACRES ` \ 9 T 1�� HERKENHOFF 424STREET NORM S i SNUK RAPIDS. MIN. 50370 PNOHE (�) FAX (320) 203-1214 / 1 'OUSE r / ?d. y 40 / MDU• E ? ° J / 41 45 iff i i � 8 / ' 7,j•4 , i � , t � 1 ' erg fit' it t� / J47 if I �je0-4 9 / 8"12J J J w ^1 40 / J JJJ 7.n IV of . SHED JO M° l i rpt ' W ' 9543 J f J I r _7 / J i 6It N I lit, o ci l/moi Jam.`— , � ,� • ��.. ' J ;:L S------ I ``� -_---- ` `- LEGEND O STORM MMMLE H O SWTAW IMANWXE • GATEVALViE �\ ■ CATCH E ASINI TC ELEV.-932.19 S.INV. ELEV.-925.35 w.aw. ELEV.-925.40 x x FENCE ■ POWER POLE c G GAS LINE T T TELEPHONE LINE \ 0 e OE OE OVERHEAD ELECTRIC TC ELEV..911.45 © TELEPHONE PED TC ELEV.-931.0S "-I"'/• ELEV-924.14 • .� cm STCw HYDRANT IMI ELEV.-926.461 E.INv. E.-924.16 W.JNV. ELEV.-924,11 VICINITY MAP :�ff, 11Y 111 SI _ J� _ n F •`"ti dl NOT TO SCaLE PROPOSED INGRESS AND EGRESS EASEMENT TO BE RECORDED PRIOR TO SUBMITTING FINAL PUT. A 24.00 foot easement for Ingress and egress pwpoess ow and ocrow tho98 parte of Lot 3. 4. and 7. Block 9. ORIGINAL PLAT OF YOKT1 MAA according to the recorded plat "wed. Wright County. ylrnssoto. downbed as fo0owc The weaterly 24.00 feet of lot 7 and Lot 4. an s»aeured of right angles to and pavllel wM the went Me d said Lot 7 and sold Lot 4. AND The Sauth 24.00 feet of the North 5400 feat d the East 81.45 feet, as rneaalred at right 04198 to and parallel with the north and east 0nee of sold Lot 3. NATE DCWNC HOUSES AND QRNE'NAYS ARE TO BE REMOVED. DEVELOPER(S): CENTRAL MINNESOTA SINGLE FAMILY HOUSING LLC 810 W. Si. CERMAIN ST. CLDUO, MN 38301 (320) 259-0393 BENCHMARK ELEVATION -934.86 TNN HYDRWT AT NE QUAD OF 6TH ST. AND MINNESOTA STREET DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEAOEMM ARE SHOWN THUS. ----------- 10 FEET' SCALE IN FEET r a- 3d 60 90 O DENOTES IRON MONUMENT SET DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND 02130 I HEREBY CEHTiiY THAT THIS PIAN. SURVEY, OR RE20M WAS *N AND THAT AAA OUIY LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR UNDEED BY ME OR UNDER MY DAECT R TAMS OF THE STATE ON MINNESOTA. LINDA H. BROWN DATE LICENSE NO. 23682 CONCEPT PLAN OF MAJESTIC HEIGHTS DR MAGE AND. U7lLnY EASEMENTS ARE -%O*W THUS: ----------- 10 FEETt SC4LE IN FEET I - - -so 90 �3 02138 1 HEREBY CERM ipw LE 4w 08 PREPM" EN Wwj=on REPORT TW I Am A DULY LJCEWSM LAmo SUpVEVM 9AMMS" Am Of 7NE STALE c" 1"430zk LOCO 7W L4WS L04M K om MEME NM 238M MONTICELLO SCATTERED I3 OUSING PROJECT LANDSCAPE PLANS LAWr4 LAWN FLOwg,RIyG DE®IIOUS SBRIIBS PERMINIAr vnvxl. �. A 04 -+aRTH { � o CONCRETE PATIO LAWN SRRIIB AND PERF.NNIAI, BORD {�, E�� 7„� j DE®IIOIIS SffiRQBS � Y 1 'S ►iY �.,.YL1� - MD SBRIIB APED , PMUWNIAL BORDER P.ExENMALS PATIO W= CONCRETE PAVERS LAWN DE®IIOIIS SEMtW i Y _11, OPTION A i OPTION B loG 10 FEET Council Agenda - 7/22/02 11. Consideration of establishing procedure for evaluating request for proposals for legal services. (RW) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: At the May 13, 2002 meeting, the City Council authorized the city staff to seek requests for proposals from a limited number of firms to provide legal services for the City of Monticello. Staff prepared a request for proposal which was submitted to five firms. Three of the five firms have responded and the staff is looking to establish a procedure for evaluating the UP's that have been received. Because there are a limited number of firms being considered, it is proposed that all firms be interviewed. The interview process can be conducted in a number of ways: 1) The Personnel Committee and city staff can interview the firms and make a recommendation to the full Council; 2) A committee made up of staff and council representatives can conduct the interviews or 3) the interviews can be conducted by the full Council at a special meeting. Having the Personnel Committee or a committee established by the Council conducting the interviews would eliminate the need for setting a special meeting. However, if the full Council wants to be involved in the process, staff would recommend that the interviews of the three firms be done at a special meeting. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Authorize the Personnel Committee and city staff to interview the three firms that submitted a proposal for legal services and make a recommendation to the full Council. 2. Authorize establishing a committee of city staff and designated council representatives to conduct the interviews. 3. Have the full City Council conduct the interviews and set a date for the interviews. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is the recommendation of the City Administrator and other city staff the that the Council selects Alternative #3. D. SUPPORTING DATA: None. JUL-22-2002 08:03 FROM-WRIGHT CO HIGHWAY wig Minnesota Department of Transportation (I (W 'r Memo Office of Traffic Engineering Mail Step 725, Second Floor 395 John Ireland Blvd. St. Paul, MN 55155-1899 September t, 2000 To- District Engineers District Traffic Engineers County Engineers City Engineers From: Gary Q. Thompson, P. E_ State Traffic Engineer +763-682-7313 T-212 P.001/001 F-490 Office Tel: 651-284-3502 Fax: 651-205-4526 Subject: "Stop for Peds. In Crosswalk" Sign Currently several cities have either installed or propose to install sighs advising motorists to "Stop for Peds. in Crosswalk. Attached is a copy of the above referenced sign. The signs are anchored to the pavement with bolts. The installation of these devises has been brought to the attention of the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devises (MMUTCD) Committee. The MMUTCD Committee's purpose is to review any material that is proposed to be included MMUTCD. The committee is made up of members representing the Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT), the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Rural Counties, Urban Counties, Cities, and Consulting Engineers. This broad base of membership is required to ensure that the MMUTCD reflects current Minnesota Statutes and/or policies as they pertain to all streets or highways within the State. The Committee hes reviewed, discussed, and evaluated a number of issues relating to these signs. The Committee's recommendation is based on State Statute Chapter 169.06 Subd 3. Placement and maintenance by local authority, which states, "All such traffic -control devices hereafter erected shall conform to the state manual and specifications." The " Stop for Peds. _in Crosswalk" sign is not in the MMUTCD or Mn/DOT's Standard Signs Manual, and therefore is not recognized as an official traffic control device in Minnesota. The Committee also recommends that if a city or county wishes to employ this sign, the sign must be evaluated in accordance with process contained in the MMUTCD. This process is outlined in PartIA-6 Manual Changes, Interpretation, and Authority to Experiment, and more specifically in 3_ Experiment and 4. General Information. If you have any questions or require further information concerning this matter, please contact Michael Spielmann at (551) 284-3507 or at michael.e=ielmannPHnt.state.mn.us. cc: Julie A. Skallman, IVIS 500 State Aid Engineers Erik JohnsonrFodd Foster, Traffic Technologies RubberTough I cO4L AA Portable Crosswalk Device Portable Rubber ase (40lbs) Fluorescent Yellow Green Diamond Grade Background. / Hi -Intensity White Ped Background. 44" X 12" Tapered -Strong Yellow -Green Sign Panel. 2� Text Portable Rubber Base model $ 248.00 + Tax Surface Mount Base wfbdwr 225.00 + Tax Crosswalk Device - 6 r-Aaw�w Sian Mounting studs Drivable Spike/Surface Haunt Base Traffic Technologies LLC Ph: 612-521-2122, Fax 612-521-1022 safes@traffic-technol 12- 1-- sales@traffic-technol ies.cdrn