The URL can be used to link to this page

City Council Agenda Packet 01-22-2018AGENDA REGULAR MEETING — MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, January 22, 2018 — 6:30 p.m. Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center Mayor: Brian Stumpf Council Members: Jim Davidson, Bill Fair, Charlotte Gabler, Lloyd Hilgart 1. General Business A. Call to Order & Pledge of Allegiance B. Approval of Meeting Minutes • Regular Meeting Minutes from January 8, 2018 C. Consideration of Adding Items to Agenda D. Citizen Comments E. Public Service Announcements F. Council Liaison Updates • EDA • 1-94 Coalition • WCAT G. Department Updates • City Administrator Update • Update — Permitting Process at BCOL • Hi -Way Liquors Annual Update • DMV Annual Update 2. Consent Agenda A. Consideration of approving payment of bills B. Consideration of approving new hires and departures for City departments C. Consideration of approving the sale/disposal of surplus city property D. Consideration of appointing Olive (011ie) White to the Economic Development Authority for a term to commence immediately and expire December 31, 2018 E. Consideration of approving a special event permit for the March Madness 5K being held on March 24, 2018, sponsored by Monticello High School Track/CC Booster Club F. Consideration of approving the 2018 Wright County Annual Highway Maintenance Agreement G. Consideration of approving Biosolids Farm Lease Agreement with Mark Holker H. Consideration of approving a request for Conditional Use Permit for an approximately 780 square foot residential detached Accessory Use Structure Major in an R-1 (Single -Family Residence) District. Applicant: James and Erica Witzmann Consideration of authorizing preparation of a partnership agreement with the Monticello Lions to develop, fund and operate a splash pad at Pioneer Park. Consideration of adopting Resolution #2018-02 accepting the feasibility report and setting a public hearing on February 12, 2018 for the Chelsea Road Utility and Street Improvements, City Project No. 17C001 K. Consideration of adopting Resolution #2018-03 authorizing preparation of a feasibility report for a 2018 Pedestrian Improvement project L. Consideration of approving additional fees for the purchase of land for 213 Chelsea Road (WSI Industries, Inc.) in the amount of $2,300 as related to the Fallon Avenue Overpass Project, City Project No. 16C006 M. Consideration of approving a three-year contract extension to RES Specialty Pyrotechnics for the annual Riverfest fireworks show for a total of $28,500 N. Consideration to approve purchase of 576 new street name signs that meet federal regulations per the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for SE Quad from M & R Signs of Fergus Falls, MN in the amount of $15,305.92 O. Consideration to ratify Jim Lindberg to an at -large position on the Bertram Chain of Lakes Advisory Council P. Consideration of adopting Resolution #2018-04 approving the amended bylaws for the Bertram Chain of Lakes Advisory Council 2A. Consideration of items removed from the consent agenda for discussion 3. Public Hearings 4. Regular Agenda 5. Added Items Adjournment REGULAR MEETING — MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, January 8, 2018 — 6:30 p.m. Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center Present: Brian Stumpf, Jim Davidson, Bill Fair, Charlotte Gabler, and Lloyd Hilgart Absent: None. 1. General Business A. Call to Order & Pledge of Allegiance Mayor Stumpf called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. All City Councilmembers were present. B. Approval of Meeting Minutes Special Meeting Minutes from meeting on December 11, 2017 Councilmember Hilgart moved approval of the special meeting minutes from December 11, 2017. Councilmember Fair seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Regular Meeting Minutes from meeting on December 11, 2017 Councilmember Gabler moved approval of the regular meeting minutes from December 11, 2017. Councilmember Davidson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Special Meeting Minutes from meeting on December 22, 2017 Councilmember Gabler moved approval of the special meeting minutes from December 22, 2017. Councilmember Davidson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. C. Bill Demeules was recognized for his service to the EDA and the community. D. Consideration of Adding Items to the Agenda Mayor Stumpf requested that staff remove the sign E. Citizen Comments None. City Council Minutes —January 8, 2018 Page 1 1 4 F. Public Service Announcements Rachel Leonard, Communications Coordinator, commented on holiday hours for Martin Luther King Junior Day. F. Council Liaison Updates • Library Board — the Library Board update was given at the December 11, 2017 meeting. • EDA — Councilhnember Davidson stated that Steve Johnson is currently acting as chair of the group. There is an opening on the board. • IEDC — Mayor Stumpf noted that he did not attend, but the group elected 2018 officers and discussed work plan. • BCOL — Councilmember Fair note that the board discussed a traffic study for 901h Street and campground proposals are due on January 26. Councilmember Fair is participating the review of the proposals on January 30. • Highway 25 Coalition — Jeff O'Neill noted that the coalition met and discussed the completion of the study. The study group is meeting January 10 and will decide on a date for an open house. G. Department Updates • City Administrator Update — Jeff O'Neill gave an update on the following: 1) There will be department head updates given during 2018 at the council meetings. 2) The city has received a good number of candidates for the Engineer/Public Works Director. Interviews will be scheduled. 3) Staff is working on a joint resolution for area cities to present to Legislature in regard to legislation and LMC policies. 4) The Xcel Prairie restoration project will conduct planting in spring. 5) The Coalition of Utility Cities has their annual meeting on January 11. 6) The League of MN Cities Conference is January 26-27. • Fire Chief Mike Mossey provided an update on the high number of fire calls. He also commented on plans for 2018 which include application for a grant for fire gear and hiring of a Deputy Fire Chief. • John Rued, Chief Building Inspector, addressed the City Council on late rental applications. These applications were due December 31. There are more than fifty applications that are late. The penalty is double the fee. There have been some complaints. 2. Consent Agenda Councilmember Fair moved approval of the Consent Agenda. Councilmember Hilgart seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. A. Consideration of approving the payment of bills. Recommendation: Approved the bill and purchase card registers for a total amount of $691,179.20. City Council Minutes —January 8, 2018 Page 2 14 B. Consideration of approving new hires/departures. Recommendation: Approved the hires for MCC, Parks, Street, and DMV, and the departures for MCC and DMV. C. Consideration of approving the sale/disposal of surplus city property. Recommendation: No report this cycle. D. Consideration of approving a temporary charitable gambling permit for Church of St. Henry for a quilt bingo event to be held on April 22, 2018. Recommendation: Approved the temporary charitable gambling permit for a quilt raffle to be conducted by the Church of St. Henry on April 22, 2018. E. Consideration of approving a request for a PUD (Planned Unit Development) Adjustment in the Union Crossing PUD. Applicant: Target Corporation. Recommendation: Approved Resolution 2018-01 approving the proposed PUD Adjustment for Target, as a part of the Union Crossings PUD, based on findings including that the proposed adjustment is consistent with the requirements for PUD adjustments in the zoning ordinance and with the conditions listed in Exhibit Z. F. Consideration of approving Ordinance 693 adopting the 2018 City of Monticello Official Zoning Map. Recommendation: Adopted Ordinance No. 693 for the 2018 City of Monticello Official Zoning Map, including Shoreland/Floodplain companion map, based on the findings in Resolution No. PC -2017-038. G. Consideration of approving additional fees for the purchase of land for 301 Chelsea Road (All Elements, Inc.) in the amount of $1,530 as related to the Fallon Avenue Overpass Project, City Project No. 16C006. Recommendation: Approved additional fees for the purchase of land for 301 Chelsea Road (All Elements, Inc.) in the amount of $1,520, as related to the Fallon Avenue Overpass Project, City Project No. 16C006. 4. Regular Agenda A. Consideration of approving annual appointments and designations for 2018. Jennifer Schreiber briefly introduced the item. There was minimal discussion. Councilmember Hilgart moved approval of the 2018 annual appointments and designations. Councilmember Davidson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. City Council Minutes —January 8, 2018 Page 3 14 5. Adiournment By consensus, the meeting was adjourned at 7:01 p.m. Recorder: Jennifer Schreiber Approved: Attest: City Administrator City Council Minutes —January 8, 2018 Page 4 14 City Council Agenda: 1/22/2018 2A. Consideration of avorovin2 vavment of bills (WO) City staff submits the attached bill registers and purchasing card registers for approval by Council. The bill registers contain all invoices processed and the purchasing card registers contain all card purchases made since the last Council meeting. Subject to MN Statutes, most invoices require Council approval prior to releasing checks for payment. The day following Council approval, payments will be released unless directed otherwise. A credit purchasing agreement and policy was approved by Council initially and card purchases must comply with the policy. If Council has no questions or comments on the bill and purchase card registers, these can be approved with the consent agenda. If requested, this item can be removed from consent and discussed prior to making a motion for approval. Al. Budget Impact: None A2. Staff Workload Impact: No additional work required 1. Motion to approve the bill and purchase card registers for a total amount of $2,185,739.32. 2. Motion to approve the registers with changes directed by Council. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends Alternative #1 or #2, per direction of Council. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • Bill registers and Purchase Card registers Accounts Payable Computer Check Proof List by Vendor User: Julie.Cheney Printed: 01/17/2018 - 4:16PM Batch: 00206.01.2018 - 206.01 2018 AP Invoice No Description Vendor: 2925 1ST LINE/LEEWES VENTURES LLC 127938 Flavored Syrups for Concession Check Total: Vendor: 4843 AEI PROPERTIES 155075001010 160006 - PID 15507500 10 10 Property ROW Ac Enabled: Check Total: Vendor: 4843 AEI PROPERTIES 155075001010 160006 - PID 15507500 10 10 - Bldg Permits Check Total: Vendor: 4843 AEI PROPERTIES 155075001010 160006 - PID 155075001010 - Site Plan Check Total: Vendor: 2820 CITY OF ALBERTVILLE 20180013 Reimb. by Cargill - SRU Training 2017 Check Total: Vendor: 4893 AMERITAS INVESTMENT PARTNERS INC 1/12/2018 16C006 - Fallon Ave ROW Acquisition Mortgag Check Total: Vendor: 4887 CLOVER ANDERSON 01/16/2018 Refunds for Mississippi Rut & Chapel Rental Ca 01/16/2018 Sales Tax - Refunds for Mississippi Rut & Chapc Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Check Sequence: 1 ACH Enabled: False 200.75 01/23/2018 226-45125-425410 200.75 Check Sequence: 2 ACH Enabled: False 70,000.00 12/22/2017 400-43300-451020 70,000.00 Check Sequence: 3 ACH Enabled: False 500.00 12/22/2017 400-43300-451020 500.00 Check Sequence: 4 ACH Enabled: False 520.00 12/22/2017 400-43300-451020 520.00 Check Sequence: 5 ACH Enabled: False 519.04 12/31/2017 101-42200-115030 519.04 Check Sequence: 6 ACH Enabled: False 500.00 01/23/2018 400-43300-451020 500.00 Check Sequence: 7 ACH Enabled: False 717.12 01/23/2018 226-45123-347570 52.88 01/23/2018 226-45123-347570 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (01/17/2018 - 4:16 PM) Page I Invoice No Description Check Total: Vendor: 3491 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3234291 resale - beer Check Total: AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (01/17/2018 - 4:16 PM) Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 770.00 Check Total: Vendor: 4502 ARVIG 1/8/2018 IT Services - Jan 2018 4502 Dec. 2017 - Border States; Adv. Media; Clearfie 200.00 Check Total: Vendor: 1065 BELLBOY CORPORATION 62305400 freight 62305400 resale- wine 62305400 resale- liquor 62305700 resale- liquor 62305700 freight 62306300 freight 62306300 resale - liquor 62393200 freight 62393200 resale - wine 62393200 resale - liquor 97023300 freight 97023300 resale -juice: condiments 42.75 Check Total: Vendor: 1067 BERNICK'S 103694 resale -juice 103694 resale - soda pop 103695 resale - beer 104340 resale - pop, Gatorade, water 106600 resale - beer credit 106601 resale - soda pop 106601 resale -juice 106602 resale - beer 107197 resale - pop, Gatorade, water 19391 resale - coffee Check Total: AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (01/17/2018 - 4:16 PM) Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 770.00 Check Sequence: 8 ACH Enabled: False 200.00 01/23/2018 609-49750-425200 200.00 Check Sequence: 9 ACH Enabled: True 1,260.00 01/23/2018 702-00000-431990 1,255.70 12/31/2017 656-49877-421800 2,515.70 Check Sequence: 10 ACH Enabled: True 42.75 01/23/2018 609-49750-433300 164.00 01/23/2018 609-49750-425300 3,921.68 01/23/2018 609-49750-425100 120.50 01/23/2018 609-49750-425100 1.80 01/23/2018 609-49750-433300 9.00 01/23/2018 609-49750-433300 810.00 01/23/2018 609-49750-425100 13,20 01/23/2018 609-49750-433300 64.00 01/23/2018 609-49750-425300 357.95 01/23/2018 609-49750-425100 0.30 01/23/2018 609-49750-433300 65.69 01/23/2018 609-49750-425500 5,570.87 Check Sequence: l 1 ACH Enabled: False 49.20 01/23/2018 609-49750-425500 175.45 01/23/2018 609-49750-425400 1,850.05 01/23/2018 609-49750-425200 665.10 01/23/2018 226-45125-425410 -7.40 01/23/2018 609-49750-425200 27.50 01/23/2018 609-49750-425400 32.80 01/23/2018 609-49750-425500 659.70 01/23/2018 609-49750-425200 270.92 01/23/2018 226-45125-425410 131.04 01/23/2018 226-45125-425410 3,854.36 Page 2 Invoice No Description Vendor: 4886 BLIND INSTALLATION AND REPAIR INC 81209 New Blind Check Total: Vendor: 4872 BOSER FAMILY PARTNERSHIP 155131001010 16C006 - PID 155131001010 Property ROW Ac 01/23/2018 Check Total: Vendor: 1080 BRAEMAR MAILING SERVICE INC 58652 UB Jan 2017 Invoices - (3750) Print, Fold, Stuff 58652 UB Jan 2017 Invoices - (3750) Print, Fold, Stuff 58652 UB Jan 2017 Invoices - (3750) Parks Insert 58652 UB Jan 2017 Invoices - (3750) FNM Insert Check Total: Vendor: 3632 BRIAN BRAMLEY 10080 Firehooks - 61b. w/ 36" yellow 12/22/2017 Check Total: Vendor: 4328 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN WINE & SPII 1080742879 resale - liquor 1080742879 resale - wine 1080742879 freight 1080742880 resale - beer 1080745864 resale - liquor 1080745864 resale - wine 1080745864 resale - mix 1080745864 freight Check Total: Vendor: 2890 BROTHERS FIRE PROTECTION CO 106126 Recharge Fire Extinguisher (d.; Food Shelf Check Total: Vendor: 4890 WILLIAM & PENNY BURT 1/5/2018 201728 - Rustech Brewing CUP - Escrow Refun Check Total: AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (01/17/2018 - 4:16 PM) Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Check Sequence: 12 ACH Enabled: False 233.00 01/23/2018 226-45126-431990 233.00 Check Sequence: 13 ACH Enabled: False 27,900.00 12/22/2017 400-43300-451020 27,900.00 Check Sequence: 14 ACH Enabled: False 718.75 01/23/2018 602-49490-431800 718.75 01/23/2018 601-49440-431800 132.50 01/23/2018 101-45201-434990 37.50 01/23/2018 656-00000-202099 1,607.50 Check Sequence: 15 ACH Enabled: True 79.94 12/31/2017 101-42200-421990 79.94 Check Sequence: 16 ACH Enabled: False 2,294.70 01/23/2018 609-49750-425100 364.00 01/23/2018 609-49750-425300 46.35 01/23/2018 609-49750-433300 130.50 01/23/2018 609-49750-425200 6,228.73 01/23/2018 609-49750-425100 62.64 01/23/2018 609-49750-425300 58.00 01/23/2018 609-49750-425400 58.31 01/23/2018 609-49750-433300 9,243 23 Check Sequence. 17 ACH Enabled: True 106.00 01/23/2018 217-41990-431900 106.00 Check Sequence: 18 ACH Enabled: False 454.44 01/23/2018 101-00000-220110 454.44 Page 3 Invoice No Description Vendor: 1091 CAMPBELL KNUTSON PA 2348-000G 185 16D001 - Dahlheimer Expansion -Dec 2017 2348-000G 185 201804 - Target Remodel PUD - Dec 2017 2348-000G 185 General Legal - Dec 2017 2348-000G 185 Planning & Zoning - Dec 2017 2348-000G 185 Building - Dec 2017 2348-148G 5 16C006 - Fallon Ave Condemnation - Dec 2017 resale- beer n/a Check Total: Vendor: 4646 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES L.P. 2049821 resale- beer n/a 2049821 80.00 resale- beer 2052712 101-00000-220110 resale- beer 2052712 12/31/2017 resale- beer n/a 354-303 resale- beer credit 101-41610-430400 80.00 Check Total: Vendor: 4089 CARLSON & LYTER DISTRIBUTING, INC 617-0030 12/31/2017 resale - beer 370.50 Check Total: Vendor: 1106 CENTRAL MCGOWAN INC 00014266 Monthly Tank Rental 00172927 Bulk Carbon Dioxide (685 lbs) 77.00 Check Total: Vendor: 4315 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 01/23/2018 609-49750-425200 Digital Receiver 01/23/2018 Check Total: Vendor: 4888 CLEAR CREEK LAND COMPANY LLC 01/05/2018 16D001 - Clear Creek Addition - Escrow Refunc 01/23/2018 Check Total: Vendor: 2935 CUSTOMIZED FIRE RESCUE TRAINING IN( 1196 MBFTE reimbursed Training multi-level; Forc. I Check Total: AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (01/17/2018 - 4:16 PM) Amount Payment Date Acct Number Check Sequence: 19 80.00 12/31/2017 101-00000-220110 240.00 12/31/2017 101-00000-220110 800.60 12/31/2017 101-41610-430400 80.00 12/31/2017 101-41910-430400 160.00 12/31/2017 101-42400-430400 370.50 12/31/2017 400-43300-459018 1,731.10 Check Sequence: 20 77.00 01/23/2018 609-49750-425400 5,584.90 01/23/2018 609-49750-425200 11,963.05 01/23/2018 609-49750-425200 42.80 01/23/2018 609-49750-425400 -45.10 01/23/2018 609-49750-425200 17,62265 220.50 220.50 65.00 141.50 206.50 7.95 7.95 131,489.45 131,489.45 1,350.00 1,350.00 Check Sequence: 21 01/23/2018 609-49750-425200 Check Sequence: 22 12/31/2017 226-45124-421600 01/23/2018 226-45124-421600 Check Sequence: 23 12/31/2017 101-41110-431990 Check Sequence: 24 01/23/2018 101-00000-220110 Check Sequence: 25 12/31/2017 101-42200-433100 Reference ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False Page 4 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Vendor: 1129 DAHLHEIMER BEVERAGE LLC Check Sequence: 26 166522 resale - beer 15,718.65 01/23/2018 609-49750-425200 166525 resale - beer credit -176.80 12/31/2017 609-49750-425200 166621 resale - beer 2,354.35 01/23/2018 609-49750-425200 166881 resale - beer 15,347.64 01/23/2018 609-49750-425200 166881 resale - beer n/a 696.10 01/23/2018 609-49750-425400 166945 resale - beer credit -34.80 01/23/2018 609-49750-425200 166946 resale - beer 43.20 01/23/2018 609-49750-425200 166993 resale - beer 102.50 01/23/2018 609-49750-425200 167229 resale - beer 3,046.95 01/23/2018 609-49750-425200 167388 resale - beer n/a 54.20 01/23/2018 609-49750-425400 167388 resale - beer 13,134.17 01/23/2018 609-49750-425200 167494 resale - beer credit -91.90 01/23/2018 609-49750-425200 Check Total: 50,194.26 Vendor: 1136 GORDON J DEHMER Check Sequence: 27 6374 (4) fire ext. serviced: mobile serv. 47.00 01/23/2018 609-49754-440440 Check Total: 47.00 Vendor: 1720 EXTRACTOR CORPORATION Check Sequence: 28 18-007 New Motor for Swimsuit Spinner 220.00 01/23/2018 226-45126-422990 Check Total: 220.00 Vendor: 2561 FERGUSON WATERWORKS #2516 Check Sequence: 29 0272050 resale - (2) 1 T10 Meter Ecdr Usg 505.72 01/23/2018 601-49440-422710 0272307 resale - (5) 5/8 T10 MTR Direct Read 368.49 01/23/2018 601-49440-422710 Check Total: 874.21 Vendor: 2273 FIBERNET MONTICELLO - ACH Check Sequence: 30 1/8/2018 MCC Cable - January 2018 319.39 01/23/2018 226-45127-432500 1/8/2018 City Hall Cable - January 2018 12.95 01/23/2018 101-41310-431990 1/8/2018 Ciy Hall Phone - January 2018 639.21 01/23/2018 702-00000-432100 1/8/2018 MCC Phone - January 2018 522.64 01/23/2018 702-00000-432100 1/8/2018 Ballfields Phone - January 2018 19.54 01/23/2018 702-00000-432100 1/8/2018 DMV Phone - January 2018 268.13 01/23/2018 702-00000-432100 1/8/2018 Hi Way Liquor Phone - January 2018 337.65 01/23/2018 702-00000-432100 1/8/2018 Fire Hall Phone - January 2018 204.07 01/23/2018 702-00000-432100 1/8/2018 Public Works Phone - January 2018 220.27 01/23/2018 702-00000-432100 1/8/2018 Parks Phone - January 2018 114.06 01/23/2018 702-00000-432100 1/8/2018 Prairie Center Phone - January 2018 14.22 01/23/2018 702-00000-432100 Reference ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: True AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (01/17/2018 - 4:16 PM) Page 5 Invoice No Description 1/8/2018 Sheriff Phone - January 2018 1/8/2018 City Hall Internet - January 2018 1/8/2018 MCC Internet - January 2018 1/8/2018 Ballfields Internet - January 2018 1/8/2018 DMV Internet - January 2018 1/8/2018 Hi Way Liquor Internet - January 2018 1/8/2018 Fire Hall Internet - January 2018 1/8/2018 Animal Shelter Internet - January 2018 1/8/2018 Public Works Internet - January 2018 1/8/2018 Sheriff Internet - January 2018 1/8/2018 City Hall Data Hosting - January 2018 1/8/2018 City Hall Service Contract - January 2018 41.95 Check Total: Vendor: 3230 SCOTT GEAREY 12312017 Reimbrs. Structure Fire 1821 85th St. NE - food Amount Pavment Date Acct Number 69.84 Check Total: Vendor: 1205 GRAINGER INC 9658256699 Flange Spud Washers (10) 01/23/2018 Check Total: Vendor: 2895 GREATER MN PARKS AND TRAILS 2018 Membership 2018 Membership 10.00 Check Total: Vendor: 1218 HACH COMPANY 10780603 (2) Fluoride Std. Sol.; Spadns Reagent Soo etc 01/23/2018 Check Total: Vendor: 1232 HILLYARD INC MINNEAPOLIS 700317145 Squeegee Hose (2) 41.95 Check Total: Vendor: 4218 HOHENSTEINS, INC 940251 resale - beer 01/23/2018 Check Total: AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (01/17/2018 - 4:16 PM) Amount Pavment Date Acct Number 69.84 12/31/2017 01/23/2018 702-00000-432100 124.95 01/23/2018 702-00000-432300 10.00 10.00 01/23/2018 702-00000-432300 10.00 01/23/2018 702-00000-432300 41.95 Check Sequence: 33 01/23/2018 702-00000-432300 41.95 225.00 01/23/2018 702-00000-432300 41.95 01/23/2018 702-00000-432300 29.95 601-49440-421990 01/23/2018 702-00000-432300 69.95 01/23/2018 702-00000-432300 41.95 01/23/2018 01/23/2018 702-00000-432300 500.00 01/23/2018 702-00000-431900 250.00 461.00 01/23/2018 702-00000-431900 3,904.62 Check Sequence: 31 119.87 12/31/2017 101-42200-421990 119.87 Check Sequence: 32 10.00 01/23/2018 226-45126-422990 10.00 Check Sequence: 33 225.00 01/23/2018 101-45201-443300 225.00 Check Sequence: 34 335.99 01/23/2018 601-49440-421990 335.99 Check Sequence: 35 32.36 01/23/2018 226-45126-422990 32.36 Check Sequence: 36 461.00 01/23/2018 609-49750-425200 461.00 Reference ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False Page 6 Invoice No Description Vendor: 4640 IRET PROPERTIES 1/5/2018 15D001 - Monticello Commerce 8th - Escrow Ri 1,000.00 Check Total: Vendor: 3369 JAKE'S EXCAVATING INC 3338 (2) graves- Leifert; Moshier 21.50 Check Total: Vendor: 1259 JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING 2779027 resale - beer n/a 2779027 freight 2779027 resale - beer 2779058 resale - beer 2779058 freight 609-49750-433300 Check Total: Vendor: 4794 JOHN CHADWICK FARMS LLC 01/05/2018 201736 - Otter Creek 5th Addition Escrow Refur Check Sequence: 40 Check Total: Vendor: 1263 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 5908269 resale - liquor 5908269 freight 5908270 freight 5908270 resale - wine 5908270 resale - mix 5908271 resale - beer 5909572 freight 5909572 resale - liquor 5909573 freight 5909573 resale - wine n/a 5909573 resale - wine 5912331 resale - liquor 5912331 freight 5912332 freight 5912332 resale - wine 5912332 resale -mix 5913458 resale - liquor 5913458 freight 5913459 freight Amount Payment Date Acct Number Check Sequence: 37 175,475.23 01/23/2018 101-00000-220110 175,475.23 Reference ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (01/17/2018 - 4:16 PM) Page 7 Check Sequence: 38 1,000.00 12/31/2017 651-49010-431150 1,000.00 Check Sequence: 39 21.50 01/23/2018 609-49750-425400 3.00 01/23/2018 609-49750-433300 732.20 01/23/2018 609-49750-425200 3,809.62 01/23/2018 609-49750-425200 3.00 01/23/2018 609-49750-433300 4,569.32 Check Sequence: 40 2,052.80 01/23/2018 101-00000-220110 2,052.80 Check Sequence: 41 1,817.25 01/23/2018 609-49750-425100 26.82 01/23/2018 609-49750-433300 37.25 01/23/2018 609-49750-433300 1,157.85 01/23/2018 609-49750-425300 89.20 01/23/2018 609-49750-425400 65.97 01/23/2018 609-49750-425200 84.95 01/23/2018 609-49750-433300 5,371.90 01/23/2018 609-49750-425100 81.59 01/23/2018 609-49750-433300 107.99 01/23/2018 609-49750-425400 2,782.63 01/23/2018 609-49750-425300 12,732.00 01/23/2018 609-49750-425100 153.74 01/23/2018 609-49750-433300 62.59 01/23/2018 609-49750-433300 1,879.05 01/23/2018 609-49750-425300 86.55 01/23/2018 609-49750-425400 8,019.02 01/23/2018 609-49750-425100 124.47 01/23/2018 609-49750-433300 38.85 01/23/2018 609-49750-433300 Reference ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (01/17/2018 - 4:16 PM) Page 7 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 5913459 resale - wine n/a 12.25 01/23/2018 609-49750-425400 5913459 resale - wine 1,893.55 01/23/2018 609-49750-425300 5915780 resale - liquor 1,305.74 01/23/2018 609-49750-425100 5915780 freight 19.37 01/23/2018 609-49750-433300 5915781 freight 25.33 01/23/2018 609-49750-433300 5915781 resale - wine 778.05 01/23/2018 609-49750-425300 660592 freight credit inv # 5903785 -0.62 12/31/2017 609-49750-433300 660592 resale - liquor credit inv # 5903785 -33.29 12/31/2017 609-49750-425100 660593 resale - Iliquor credit inv # 5903788 -144.10 12/31/2017 609-49750-425100 660593 freight credit inv # 5903788 -1.39 12/31/2017 609-49750-433300 Check Total: 38,574.56 Vendor: 4885 KB PROPERTIES Check Sequence: 42 ACH Enabled: False 01/05/2018 201722 - Affordable Storage PUD - Escrow Refi 5,719.10 01/23/2018 101-00000-220110 Check Total: 5,719.10 Vendor: 4889 KEN SPAETH MASONRY INC Check Sequence: 43 ACH Enabled: False 1/5/2018 201710 - Spaeth Indust Park - Escrow Refund 1,259.78 01/23/2018 101-00000-220110 Check Total: 1,259.78 Vendor: 4891 LAMONT COMMMERCIAL Check Sequence: 44 ACH Enabled: False 1/5/2018 201721 - Crown Bay Retail - Escrow Refund 232.60 01/23/2018 101-00000-220110 Check Total: 23260 Vendor: 3522 LIVE LAUGH AND BLOOM Check Sequence: 45 ACH Enabled: False 100000153 flowers G. Leifert - 12/7/17 64.69 12/31/2017 101-42200-443990 Check Total: 64.69 Vendor: 4456 LUPULIN BREWING LLC Check Sequence: 46 ACH Enabled: True 10361 resale - beer 504.00 01/23/2018 609-49750-425200 Check Total: 504.00 Vendor: 1300 DOUGLAS WILLIAM LYSENG Check Sequence: 47 ACH Enabled: True 1365 External Hard Drive, POS Printer, 480.00 12/31/2017 702-00000-421990 1365 "utx" - Cash Registers, Power Strip 330.00 12/31/2017 702-00000-421990 1365 On Site Services (7/27/17 - 12/7/17) 2,422.50 12/31/2017 702-00000-431990 1366 Midspan, Computer & Software for Swan Cam 925.00 12/31/2017 702-00000-421990 1367 Computers (3) - JO, TP, Spare 4,300.00 12/31/2017 702-00000-424100 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (01/17/2018 - 4:16 PM) Page 8 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number 8,457.50 Reference Check Total: Vendor: 1303 M AMUNDSON CIGAR & CANDY CO, LLP 251359 resale - cigarettes 251359 609-49750-425500 resale - tobacco; bar supplies; soda pop; etc 1,972.26 Check Total: Vendor: 3745 MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 20558329 ACH Enabled: True (600) gal diesel (a! $2.57 20558353 101-43120-421200 (600) gal unleaded (a $2.12 20576418 12/31/2017 (800) gal. diesel (a) $2.66 20576435 2,130.52 (499) gal. unleaded (a, $2.28 101-43120-421200 Check Total: Vendor: 3425 MAPLE LAKE LUMBER COMPANY Shed Repair Storm Damage repr 2017. - reimbrs. by insuaran Check Total: Vendor: 1308 MARCO INC 348599895 101-43127-431990 1/10/18 - 2/10/18 Contract Payment 11,040.69 Check Total: Vendor: 4879 RONALD J MARES 15/2018 ACH Enabled: True (5) hrs Excavator service - Bit of I laven Stable E 01/23/2018 702-00000-441500 Check Total: Vendor: 1317 MDRA 1/17/2018 2018 MDRA Dues Check Sequence: 52 ACH Enabled: False Check Total: Vendor: 4667 MILLNER VINEYARD, LLC 21218-1 resale - wine Check Total: Vendor: 1738 MN DEPT OF HEALTH Qtr 4 2017 217-41990-443300 Community Water Supply Serv. Conn Fee Qtr 3, Amount Payment Date Acct Number 8,457.50 Reference AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (01/17/2018 - 4:16 PM) Page 9 Check Sequence: 48 ACH Enabled: True 1,493.80 01/23/2018 609-49750-425500 478.46 01/23/2018 609-49750-425500 1,972.26 Check Sequence: 49 ACH Enabled: True 1,544.36 12/31/2017 101-43120-421200 1,032.09 12/31/2017 101-43120-421200 2,130.52 01/23/2018 101-43120-421200 1,135.69 01/23/2018 101-43120-421200 5,842.66 Check Sequence: 50 ACH Enabled: False 11,040.69 12/31/2017 101-43127-431990 11,040.69 Check Sequence: 51 ACH Enabled: True 2,458.34 01/23/2018 702-00000-441500 2,458.34 Check Sequence: 52 ACH Enabled: False 1,000.00 12/31/2017 101-42200-431990 1,000.00 Check Sequence: 53 ACH Enabled: False 545.00 01/23/2018 217-41990-443300 545.00 Check Sequence: 54 ACH Enabled: False 378.00 01/23/2018 609-49750-425300 378.00 Check Sequence: 55 ACH Enabled: False 6,807.00 12/31/2017 601-49440-443750 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (01/17/2018 - 4:16 PM) Page 9 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Check Total: 6,807.00 Vendor: 3017 THE MN TRANSPORTATION ALLIANCE Check Sequence: 56 ACH Enabled: False P19-1009 Annual Membership - Jan - Dec 2018 360.00 01/23/2018 101-43111-443300 Check Total: 360.00 Vendor: 1370 MONTICELLO DEPUTY REG #002 Check Sequence: 57 ACH Enabled: False 1/17/2018 Streets Dept License Tab Renewals (24 Vehicles 384.00 01/23/2018 101-43120-443700 1/17/2018 DMV Dept License Tab Renewals (1 Vehicle) 16.00 01/23/2018 217-41990-443990 1/17/2018 Parks Dept License Tab Renewals (14 Vehicles) 224.00 01/23/2018 101-45201-443990 1/17/2018 Building Dept License Tab Renewals (2 Vehicles 32.00 01/23/2018 101-42400-443700 1/17/2018 Water Dept License Tab Renewals (3 Vehicles) 48.00 01/23/2018 601-49440-443700 1/17/2018 W WTP Dept License Tab Renewals (1 Vehicles) 16.00 01/23/2018 602-49480-443700 1/17/2018 Sewer Dept License Tab Renewals (4 Vehicles) 64.00 01/23/2018 602-49490-443700 Check Total: 784.00 Vendor: 1377 MONTICELLO SENIOR CENTER Check Sequence: 58 ACH Enabled: True January 2018 Monthly Allocatoin - Jan 2018 5,013.33 01/23/2018 101-45175-444310 Check Total: 5,013.33 Vendor: 2518 NEOFUNDS BY NEOPOST Check Sequence: 59 ACH Enabled: False 01/03/2018 Postage for Pkgs to Dept Public Safety - Dec 201 60.40 12/31/2017 217-41990-432200 01/03/2018 Postage Purchased 12/14/17 1,000.00 12/31/2017 101-00000-155010 01/03/2018 Postage 29.61 12/31/2017 101-41310-443990 Check Total: 1,090.01 Vendor: 1687 NORTHLAND SECURITIES INC Check Sequence: 60 ACH Enabled: False 5149 2016 Continuing Disclosure Report 275.00 12/31/2017 312-47000-431990 5149 2016 Continuing Disclosure Report 275.00 12/31/2017 317-47000-431990 5149 2016 Continuing Disclosure Report 275.00 12/31/2017 318-47000-431990 5149 2016 Continuing Disclosure Report 275.00 12/31/2017 319-47000-431990 5149 2016 Continuing Disclosure Report 275.00 12/31/2017 320-47000-431990 Check Total: 1,375.00 Vendor: 1401 NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS Check Sequence: 61 ACH Enabled: True 23364 Dec 2017 - Tech Assistance - City Projects 1,166.02 12/31/2017 101-41910-431990 23365 2017-01 - Dec 2017 - Tech Assistance - Pre Desi 1,875.96 12/31/2017 101-41910-431990 23366 Dec 2017 - Tech Assistance - Meetings 150.00 12/31/2017 101-41910-431990 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (01/17/2018 - 4:16 PM) Page 10 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 23367 Dec 2017 - Tech Assistance - CCD Zoning Distr 1,771.95 12/31/2017 101-41910-431990 Check Total: 4,963.93 Vendor: 4892 SINA NYLAND Check Sequence: 62 ACH Enabled: False 1/5/2018 201733 - Nordic Brewing CUP - Escrow Refund 321.70 01/23/2018 101-00000-220110 Check Total: 321.70 Vendor: 4368 OFFICE DEPOT INC Check Sequence: 63 ACH Enabled: True 995700636001 (3) 2pk plastic mag. files 22.77 01/23/2018 101-43110-421990 995700853001 20pk AA batteries 17.09 01/23/2018 101-43110-421990 995700854001 (2)ring binders 17.08 01/23/2018 101-43110-421990 Check Total: 56.94 Vendor: 4884 JAY OLSON Check Sequence: 64 ACH Enabled: False O1/11/2018 Refund Double Paid Special Assessment PID 15 4,600.00 12/31/2017 321-00000-361000 Check Total: 4,600.00 Vendor: 1411 OLSON & SONS ELECTRIC INC Check Sequence: 65 ACH Enabled: True 55957 Labor -ballast lamps; fuses in St. Lights; rep. wire 920.00 12/31/2017 101-43160-431990 55957 Materials - ballast lamps; fuses in St. Lights; rep 876.60 12/31/2017 101-43160-431990 56024 Materials - (4) fuse holder; buck. truck; 70w lam 536.80 12/31/2017 101-43160-431990 56024 Labor- troubleshoot & repair 190.00 12/31/2017 101-43160-431990 Check Total: 2,523.40 Vendor: 1273 PAUSTIS & SONS WINE CO Check Sequence: 66 ACH Enabled: False 8617463 resale - wine 2,545.72 01/23/2018 609-49750-425300 8617463 freight 28.75 01/23/2018 609-49750-433300 Check Total: 2,574.47 Vendor: 1427 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS CO Check Sequence: 67 ACH Enabled: False 2289062 freight 46.45 01/23/2018 609-49750-433300 2289062 resale - liquor 3,877.14 01/23/2018 609-49750-425100 2289063 freight 26.08 01/23/2018 609-49750-433300 2289063 resale - wine 1,216.48 01/23/2018 609-49750-425300 2290983 resale - liquor 7,380.02 01/23/2018 609-49750-425100 2290983 freight 78.23 01/23/2018 609-49750-433300 2290984 freight 49.17 01/23/2018 609-49750-433300 2290984 resale - wine 1,628.00 01/23/2018 609-49750-425300 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (01/17/2018 - 4:16 PM) Page I 1 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 2290984 resale - wine n/a 128.00 01/23/2018 609-49750-425400 2291826 resale - liquor 1,289.44 01/23/2018 609-49750-425100 2291826 freight 14.29 01/23/2018 609-49750-433300 2291827 freight 16.39 01/23/2018 609-49750-433300 2291827 resale - lime juice 51.76 01/23/2018 609-49750-425500 2291827 resale - mix 50.28 01/23/2018 609-49750-425400 2291827 resale - wine 516.90 01/23/2018 609-49750-425300 2293474 resale - liquor 1,201.30 01/23/2018 609-49750-425100 2293474 freight 10.74 01/23/2018 609-49750-433300 2293475 freight 4.47 01/23/2018 609-49750-433300 2293475 resale- wine 101.50 01/23/2018 609-49750-425300 283626 resale - wine credit inv. #2285510 -72.00 12/31/2017 609-49750-425300 283626 freight credit inv. #2285510 -11.92 12/31/2017 609-49750-433300 283627 freight credit inv. #2285510 -11.92 12/31/2017 609-49750-433300 283627 resale - wine credit inv. #2285510 -454.25 12/31/2017 609-49750-425300 283628 resale - liquor credit inv. #2285511 -735.17 12/31/2017 609-49750-425300 283628 freight credit inv. #2285511 -7.70 12/31/2017 609-49750-433300 Check Total: 16,393.68 Vendor: 1455 RED'S MARATHON Check Sequence: 68 ACH Enabled: False 12/13/17 Water Well #3- (2) batteries for 125 KW Generator 290.00 12/31/2017 601-49440-422100 Check Total: 290.00 Vendor: 4022 REINHART FOODSERVICE LLC Check Sequence: 69 ACH Enabled: True 153264 Food for Concession Resale 342.10 01/23/2018 226-45125-425410 160399 Food for Concession Resale 479.55 01/23/2018 226-45125-425410 Check Total: 821.65 Vendor: 4575 REPLENISHMENT SOLUTIONS LLC Check Sequence: 70 ACH Enabled: True 2037677 resale - beer 25.00 01/23/2018 609-49750-425200 Check Total: 25.00 Vendor: 1474 PATRICIAA SALZWEDEL Check Sequence: 71 ACH Enabled: True Jan 2nd Semi Monthly Contract Payment 1,593.75 01/23/2018 101-42700-431200 Check Total: 1,593.75 Vendor: 3827 SAMBATEK INC Check Sequence: 72 ACH Enabled: True 11343 Code Updates - Project Admin Services thru 12/: 337.50 12/31/2017 101-41910-431990 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (01/17/2018 - 4:16 PM) Page 12 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number 337.50 140.00 140.00 3,076.90 30.10 17.50 1,026.77 3,571.89 37.45 10.50 689.55 8,460.66 900.00 900.00 1,115.96 33.75 157.50 1,307.21 329.82 329.82 471.62 471.63 196.25 315.50 Check Total 1,455.00 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (01/17/2018 - 4:16 PM) Check Sequence: 73 12/31/2017 226-45123-431992 Check Total: Vendor: 2443 SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA INC W5920978 12/30/17 - Event Security 01/23/2018 Check Total: Vendor: 3309 SOUTHERN GLAZER'S WINE AND SPIRITS. 1634598 resale - liquor 1634598 freight 1634599 freight 1634599 resale - wine 1636817 resale - liquor 1636817 freight 1636818 freight 1636818 resale - wine Amount Payment Date Acct Number 337.50 140.00 140.00 3,076.90 30.10 17.50 1,026.77 3,571.89 37.45 10.50 689.55 8,460.66 900.00 900.00 1,115.96 33.75 157.50 1,307.21 329.82 329.82 471.62 471.63 196.25 315.50 Check Total 1,455.00 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (01/17/2018 - 4:16 PM) Check Sequence: 73 12/31/2017 226-45123-431992 Check Total: Vendor: 4874 SPLASH SCHOOL LLC 3717 Instructor for Lifeguarding Class 01/23/2018 Check Total: Vendor: 2564 SPORTS PRO LLC 114 Parts - WO #211 - Pin, Shaft Bearings, Pedal Set 115 Parts - WO #212 - Alternator Brush Set 115 Labor - WO #212 - Stair Master #C5 Amount Payment Date Acct Number 337.50 140.00 140.00 3,076.90 30.10 17.50 1,026.77 3,571.89 37.45 10.50 689.55 8,460.66 900.00 900.00 1,115.96 33.75 157.50 1,307.21 329.82 329.82 471.62 471.63 196.25 315.50 Check Total 1,455.00 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (01/17/2018 - 4:16 PM) Check Sequence: 73 12/31/2017 226-45123-431992 Check Total: Vendor: 3594 STRATEGIC EQUIPMENT, LLC 99MV8G asst. bags; canliner; roll towel; disinfect. cleaner: 01/23/2018 Check Total: Vendor: 4006 SUMMIT COMPANIES 1232337 (31) annual Fire Extinguisher Maint.; (1) 10# Ex 1232337 (31) annual Fire Extinguisher Maint.; (1) 10# Ex 1232341 (19) annual Fire Extinguisher Maint - Water 1232347 (15) annual Fire Extinguisher Maint.; (1) 2.5# A: Amount Payment Date Acct Number 337.50 140.00 140.00 3,076.90 30.10 17.50 1,026.77 3,571.89 37.45 10.50 689.55 8,460.66 900.00 900.00 1,115.96 33.75 157.50 1,307.21 329.82 329.82 471.62 471.63 196.25 315.50 Check Total 1,455.00 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (01/17/2018 - 4:16 PM) Check Sequence: 73 12/31/2017 226-45123-431992 Check Sequence: 75 12/31/2017 226-45127-431990 Check Sequence: 76 01/23/2018 226-45126-422990 01/23/2018 226-45126-422990 01/23/2018 226-45126-431990 Check Sequence: 77 01/23/2018 609-49754-421990 Check Sequence: 78 12/31/2017 101-43120-431990 12/31/2017 101-43127-431990 12/31/2017 601-49440-421990 12/31/2017 101-45201-420650 Reference ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False Page 13 Check Sequence: 74 01/23/2018 609-49750-425100 01/23/2018 609-49750-433300 01/23/2018 609-49750-433300 01/23/2018 609-49750-425300 01/23/2018 609-49750-425100 01/23/2018 609-49750-433300 01/23/2018 609-49750-433300 01/23/2018 609-49750-425300 Check Sequence: 75 12/31/2017 226-45127-431990 Check Sequence: 76 01/23/2018 226-45126-422990 01/23/2018 226-45126-422990 01/23/2018 226-45126-431990 Check Sequence: 77 01/23/2018 609-49754-421990 Check Sequence: 78 12/31/2017 101-43120-431990 12/31/2017 101-43127-431990 12/31/2017 601-49440-421990 12/31/2017 101-45201-420650 Reference ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False Page 13 Invoice No Description Vendor: 4880 DONALD SWENDSRUD 11/08/17 rembrs reimburse mailbox 11-8-17 Check Total: Vendor: 1518 TDS TELECOM 763-271-3257 TDS 763-295-2005 TDS 763-295-3714 TDS Check Total: Vendor: 2614 TITAN MACHINERY 518-1600 Check Sequence: 80 compactor - Wacker BS604AS Enabled: True Check Total: Vendor: 4782 TKO WINES, INC 6744 resale - wine 01/23/2018 702-00000-432100 Check Total: Vendor: 1543 US BANK TRUST SERVICES 4851942 702-00000-432100 G.O. Wastewater Bonds 2013B Paying Agent Fe Check Total: Vendor: 1544 US POSTAL SERVICE 1/9/2018 PI 42 - UB Dec Billing (3,750 pcs) (1/2) 1/9/2018 Check Sequence: 81 PI 42 - UB Dec Billing (3,750 pcs) (1/2) Enabled: False Check Total: Vendor: 1550 VEOLIA WATER N AM OPERATING SERV L 90136413 Feb 2018 WWTP Operations & Maintenance Check Total: Vendor: 1552 VIKING COCA COLA BOTTLING CO 2079128 Check Sequence: 82 resale - soda pop 2085675 False resale - soda pop 01/23/2018 609-49750-425300 Check Total: Vendor: 1684 VINOCOPIA Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Check Sequence: 79 ACH Enabled: False 53.67 12/31/2017 101-43120-421990 53.67 Check Sequence: 80 ACH Enabled: True 95.31 01/23/2018 702-00000-432100 19.14 01/23/2018 702-00000-432100 337.87 01/23/2018 702-00000-432100 452.32 Check Sequence: 81 ACH Enabled: False 2,780.00 12/31/2017 101-43120-424100 2,780.00 Check Sequence: 82 ACH Enabled: False 661.20 01/23/2018 609-49750-425300 661.20 Check Sequence: 83 ACH Enabled: False 425.00 01/23/2018 602-49480-462010 425.00 Check Sequence: 84 ACH Enabled: False 849.37 01/23/2018 602-49490-432200 849.38 01/23/2018 601-49440-432200 1,698.75 Check Sequence: 85 ACH Enabled: True 55,145.50 01/23/2018 602-49480-430800 55,145.50 Check Sequence. 86 ACH Enabled: True 472.75 01/23/2018 609-49750-425400 220.75 01/23/2018 609-49750-425400 693.50 Check Sequence: 87 ACH Enabled: True AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (01/17/2018 - 4:16 PM) Page 14 Invoice No Description 0197842 resale - mix 0197842 resale - wine 0197842 resale - liquor 0198348 resale - wine 0198348 resale - liquor 0198348 freight 0198402 freight 0198402 resale - liquor Vendor: 1579 Check Total: Vendor: 1561 WATER LABORATORIES INC 6601 Dec. 2017 Water Testing AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (01/17/2018 - 4:16 PM) Check Total: Vendor: 1863 WEST METRO BUICK-PONTIAC-GMC INC 206673 Squad 5 - stuck cylinder; wom key- replaced ke) 112.00 Check Total: Vendor: 1573 WINE MERCHANTS INC 7166109 resale - wine 7166109 freight 717755 freight credit inv. #7164997 717755 resale - wine credit inv. #7164997 Amount Pavment Date Acct Number 120.00 Check Total: Vendor: 1577 WRIGHT CO AUDITOR-TREAS - ACH 01/12/2018 Court Fines & Fees for Dec 2017 January January 2018 Deputies Contract 175.25 Check Total: Vendor: 1581 WRIGHT CO RECORDER 201700000118 Misc Agreement - Houston - # A1360951 01/23/2018 Check Total: Vendor: 1579 WRIGHT COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPARTMEN 981 (160.45) ton salt 14.00 Check Total: AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (01/17/2018 - 4:16 PM) Amount Pavment Date Acct Number 120.00 Check Sequence: 90 01/23/2018 609-49750-425400 907.79 609-49750-433300 01/23/2018 609-49750-425300 175.25 609-49750-425300 01/23/2018 609-49750-425100 388.00 01/23/2018 609-49750-425300 402.25 01/23/2018 609-49750-425100 14.00 01/23/2018 609-49750-433300 2.50 01/23/2018 609-49750-433300 112.00 01/23/2018 609-49750-425100 2,121.79 256.00 256.00 80.99 80.99 616.00 10.43 -0.37 -25.80 600.26 2,834.16 105,120.00 107.954.16 46.00 46.00 10,204.94 10,204.94 Check Sequence: 88 12/31/2017 601-49440-422740 Check Sequence: 89 12/31/2017 101-42200-422110 Check Sequence: 91 12/31/2017 101-42100-430410 01/23/2018 101-42100-430500 Check Sequence: 92 12/31/2017 101-41910-431990 Check Sequence: 93 12/31/2017 101-43125-421700 Reference ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False Page 15 Check Sequence: 90 01/23/2018 609-49750-425300 01/23/2018 609-49750-433300 12/31/2017 609-49750-433300 12/31/2017 609-49750-425300 Check Sequence: 91 12/31/2017 101-42100-430410 01/23/2018 101-42100-430500 Check Sequence: 92 12/31/2017 101-41910-431990 Check Sequence: 93 12/31/2017 101-43125-421700 Reference ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False Page 15 Invoice No Description Vendor: 1580 WRIGHT COUNTY JOURNAL PRESS 6114056 Fall Wine Sale - Full color 12/31/2017 Check Total: Vendor: 1584 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 001494-700 51 General W WTP - Nov 2017 001494-780 26 MS4/SWPPP Services - Nov 2017 001494-950 39 140002 - Phosphorus Construction Admin - No 001494-950 39 14C 002 - Digester Construction Admin - Nov 21 001627-680 22 16D002 - Mills Fleet Farm Plan Review - Nov 002596-010 35 General Engineering Services Phase 6 - Nov 201 002596-010 35 General Engineering Services Phase 5 - Nov 201 002596-010 35 General Engineering Services Phase 5 - Nov 201 002596-010 35 General Engineering Services Phase 5 - Nov 201 002596-020 12 State Aid Network - Nov 2017 002596-030 26 Maps - Nov 2017 002596-040 27 GIS Support Services 002596-100 30 15C001 - 2016 Street Reconstruction Project - N 002596-160 23 15C004 - 7th Street/TH 25 Intersection bnprovei 002596-300 5 16C004 - CR 39/Gillard Ave Intersection Improv 002596-340 14 2016 - 2017 Market Matching - Nov 2017 002596-360 14 16C003 - 2017 Street Improvements - Nov 2017 002596-390 9 2016006 - Monticello Specialty Clinic - Nov 20 002596-400 11 16C006 - Fallon Ave Improvements - Nov 2017 R010151-000 5 17D003 - Featherstone 3rd Addition R010438-000 5 170001 - Chelsea Road Utility & Street hnprow R010454-000 5 170002 - 7th Street & Cedar Street hnprovemen R010648-000 3 201732 - SPO Townhomes PUD Plan Review - R010938-000 2 201739 - Ryan Motors Plan Review - Nov 201 Check Total: Total for Check Run: Total of Number of Checks: Amount Payment Date Acct Number Check Sequence: 94 901.82 12/31/2017 609-49754-434990 901.82 620.50 545.00 3,699.00 3,630.50 218.00 1,316.00 2,660.00 2,660.00 2,660.00 27.25 740.00 1,139.00 1,845.00 1,266.00 321.00 700.00 13,336 25 1,035.50 46,737.00 1,744.00 11,169,00 5,598.50 685.00 304.00 104,656.50 946,230.27 95 Reference ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: True The preceding list of bills payables was reviewed and approved for payment. Date: 1/22/18 Approved by: Mayor Brian Stumpf AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (01/17/2018 - 4:16 PM) Page 16 Check Sequence: 95 12/31/2017 602-49480-430300 12/31/2017 101-43111-430300 12/31/2017 602-00000-165010 12/31/2017 602-00000-165010 12/31/2017 101-43111-430300 12/31/2017 101-43111-430300 12/31/2017 101-43111-430300 12/31/2017 601-49440-430300 12/31/2017 602-49490-430300 12/31/2017 101-43111-430300 12/31/2017 101-43111-430300 12/31/2017 702-00000-431990 12/31/2017 400-43300-459011 12/31/2017 400-43300-459014 12/31/2017 400-43300-459017 12/31/2017 213-46301-431990 12/31/2017 400-43300-459016 12/31/2017 101-43111-430300 12/31/2017 400-43300-459018 12/31/2017 101-00000-220110 12/31/2017 400-43300-430300 12/31/2017 400-43300-430300 12/31/2017 101-00000-220110 12/31/2017 101-00000-220110 Reference ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: True The preceding list of bills payables was reviewed and approved for payment. Date: 1/22/18 Approved by: Mayor Brian Stumpf AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (01/17/2018 - 4:16 PM) Page 16 Accounts Payable Computer Check Proof List by Vendor User: Debbie.Davidson Printed: 01/17/2018 - 1124AM Batch: 00201.01.2018 - 201.01 2018 US Bank Invoice No Description Vendor: 2968 BOND TRUST SERV CORP - Wire Transfer 38792 Series 2010A GO Bonds - Principal 38792 Series 2010A GO Bonds - Interest 38793 Series 2011 AGO Bonds - Principal 38793 Series 2011 A GO Bonds - Interest 01/15/2018 Check Total: Vendor: 3241 LINCOLN FINANCIAL GROUP 1/1/2018 January 2018 01/15/2018 Check Total: Vendor: 1593 MN DEPT OF REVENUE - ACH December Dec Sales Tax - General December Dec Waste Tax - General December Dec Sales Tax - General December Dec Sales Tax - Cemetary December Dec Sales Tax - Cemetary December Dec Waste Tax - General December Dec Sales Tax - Water December Dec Sales Tax - Hi Way Liquor December Dec Sales Tax - Hi Way Liquor December Dec Sales Tax - Water December Dec Sales Tax - MCC December Dec Sales Tax - MCC Check Total: Vendor: 4732 MONEY MOVERS, INC. 106087 Money Movers - Fitness Rewards - Dec 2017 Check Total: Amount 275,000.00 13,571.25 720,000.00 33,275.00 1,041,846.25 1,805.86 1,805.86 0.19 0.05 15.81 2.40 -0.40 711.95 0.05 61,096.73 0,27 1,284.95 9,030.54 -0.54 72,142.00 69.50 69.50 Payment Date Acct Number Check Sequence: 1 01/15/2018 317-47000-460100 01/15/2018 317-47000-461100 01/15/2018 312-47000-460100 01/15/2018 312-47000-461100 Check Sequence: 2 01/15/2018 101-00000-217066 Check Sequence: 4 12/31/2017 226-45122-430900 Reference ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: True ACII Enabled: True AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (01/17/2018 - 11:24 AM) Page I Check Sequence: 3 01/15/2018 101-41310-443990 01/15/2018 101-43230-443990 01/15/2018 101-00000-208100 01/15/2018 651-00000-208100 01/15/2018 651-00000-362900 01/15/2018 101-00000-208120 01/15/2018 601-49440-443990 01/15/2018 609-00000-208100 01/15/2018 609-49750-443990 01/15/2018 601-00000-208100 01/15/2018 226-00000-208100 01/15/2018 226-45122-362900 Check Sequence: 4 12/31/2017 226-45122-430900 Reference ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: True ACII Enabled: True AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (01/17/2018 - 11:24 AM) Page I Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Vendor: 1426 CITY OF MONTICELLO Check Sequence: 5 UB Nov. 2017 8528 - Monti -NSP Softball Field 2171 River St \ 13.66 12/31/2017 101-45203-438200 UB Nov. 2017 8177 - Library 60.63 12/31/2017 101-45501-438200 UB Nov. 2017 7224 - WWTP 1,305.54 12/31/2017 602-49480-438200 UB Nov. 2017 8117 - MCC 1,238.98 12/31/2017 226-45126-438200 UB Nov. 2017 7885 - Help Center 17.24 12/31/2017 217-41990-438200 UB Nov. 2017 8114 - Hi -Way Liquor 39.84 12/31/2017 609-49754-438200 UB Nov. 2017 8119 - Fire Station 22.67 12/31/2017 101-42200-438200 UB Nov. 2017 8903 - PW Shop/Clerical 101.77 12/31/2017 101-43127-438200 UB Nov. 2017 8904 - PW Vehicle Storage 10.00 12/31/2017 101-43127-438200 UB Nov. 2017 8905- PW Office 22.67 12/31/2017 101-43127-438200 UB Nov. 2017 5026 - Ellison Park 13.66 12/31/2017 101-45201-438200 UB Nov. 2017 5250 - Bridge Park W 13.66 12/31/2017 101-45201-438200 UB Nov. 2017 5637 - Dog Park 5.45 12/31/2017 101-45201-438200 UB Nov. 2017 8086 - 4th St. Warming House 13.66 12/31/2017 101-45201-438200 UB Nov. 2017 8622 - Pioneer Pk. 13.66 12/31/2017 101-45201-438200 UB Nov. 2017 14476 - Ellison House 707 Broadway W 13.66 12/31/2017 101-45201-438200 UB Nov. 2017 7256-003 - 349 Broadway W - EDA 13.66 12/31/2017 213-46301-438200 UB Nov. 2017 8120 - Bldg. Inspec. Garage 13.66 12/31/2017 101-41940-438200 UB Nov. 2017 10128 - 118 6th St W 13.66 12/31/2017 101-41941-438200 UB Nov. 2017 8631 - Animal Shelter 203 Chelsea Rd 13.66 12/31/2017 101-42700-438200 Check Total: 2,961.39 Vendor: 2811 US BANK CORPORATE PMT SYSTEM Check Sequence: 6 01/06/2018 WHCE -909 Gold Crs. Rd.r Jan 2018 19.95 12/31/2017 101-43110-431900 01/06/2018 Verizon - Oct 11 -Nov 10 45.39 12/31/2017 101-43115-432100 01/06/2018 Verizon - Oct 21 - Nov 20 309.99 12/31/2017 101-43115-432100 01/06/2018 Verizon - Oct 21 - Nov 20 48.57 12/31/2017 101-43115-432100 01/06/2018 Verizon - Nov I l - Dec 10 25.02 12/31/2017 101-43115-432100 01/06/2018 Fastenal - (100) earplugs; (8) eyewear; etc 85.00 12/31/2017 101-43120-420650 01/06/2018 Grady's - (2) qt. paint rstp Oil Safety Red- chipp 20.96 12/31/2017 101-43120-421990 01/06/2018 Grady's - #150 - qt. safety red; 16oz. cleaner; car 23.46 12/31/2017 101-43120-421990 01/06/2018 Home Depot - plywood; 6pk knit poly roller; tra, 35.88 12/31/2017 101-43120-421990 01/06/2018 Brock White- asst. concrete tools - Streets 512.63 12/31/2017 101-43120-421990 01/06/2018 Amazon - Leveling Rod; Tripod w/Dual Clamp 283.60 12/31/2017 101-43120-421990 01/06/2018 Monti Napa - Napa hydraul. fil 1290 25.35 12/31/2017 101-43120-422100 01/06/2018 Runnings - 8" replacement blade 44.99 12/31/2017 101-43120-422100 01/06/2018 Titan -wheel kit; manfold water assy 385.82 12/31/2017 101-43120-422100 01/06/2018 Environmental Equip. - #150- Curtain Set 417.55 12/31/2017 101-43120-422100 01/06/2018 Monti Napa - #112 - (3) Max -50 7.68 12/31/2017 101-43120-422110 01/06/2018 Monti Napa - #110- oil filter 7.82 12/31/2017 101-43120-422110 01/06/2018 Monti Napa -#112-relay 9.98 12/31/2017 101-43120-422110 Reference ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: True AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (01/17/2018 - 11:24 AM) Page 2 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 01/06/2018 Monti Napa - #110 - (4) clamp 46.40 12/31/2017 101-43120-422110 01/06/2018 Husky Springs - #110- (4) Spring Pin; (4) Bushir 105.52 12/31/2017 101-43120-422110 01/06/2018 Titan - 9117 - valve 113.61 12/31/2017 101-43120-422110 01/06/2018 Noss Truck- #116 (2) V -Ribbed Parts 127.62 12/31/2017 101-43120-422110 01/06/2018 UpolsteryPlus -#130 repairs 327.45 12/31/2017 101-43120-422110 01/06/2018 Auto Value - round mirror head 8.99 12/31/2017 101-43120-422110 01/06/2018 Fleet Farm - #143 - spash guards 24.99 12/31/2017 101-43120-422110 01/06/2018 Midwest Bus Parts - (6) heated wiper refill 296.10 12/31/2017 101-43120-422110 01/06/2018 Monti Napa 4116- (4) Hose end; (2) weathershi, 100.24 01/15/2018 101-43120-422110 01/06/2018 Wausau Tile - (12) 48x24 planter; (12) Reservoir 8,870.03 12/31/2017 101-43120-422500 01/06/2018 Trusted Employees - Dec Background Checks (1 37.00 12/31/2017 101-43120-431990 01/06/2018 Verizon - Oct 21 - Nov 20 26.02 12/31/2017 101-43120-432100 01/06/2018 Verizon - Nov 4 - Dec 3 41.38 12/31/2017 101-43120-432100 01/06/2018 MN Nursery & Landscape- TM- training 1/2-4/1 280.00 12/31/2017 101-43120-433100 01/06/2018 Plaza Parking - Greens Expo parking- TM STree 11.00 01/15/2018 101-43120-433100 01/06/2018 Upolstery Plus - #114- Bullet Cadora; sew foam 737.90 12/31/2017 101-43120-440500 01/06/2018 Aramark - uniforms Nov. 2017 - Streets 285.40 12/31/2017 101-43120-441700 01/06/2018 CWP- #212 & stock- (2) skidloaderpipe; (4) mz 189.68 01/15/2018 101-43125-422100 01/06/2018 Trueman Welters - Snow Pusher; Back DragJ2) 5,488.20 12/31/2017 101-43125-424100 01/06/2018 Applied MSS- (2) 12pk paint 245.63 12/31/2017 101-43127-421510 01/06/2018 Home Depot - (6) LED Utility bulbs 209.82 12/31/2017 101-43127-421530 01/06/2018 Runnings - LED recti. work light;(2) LED rechar 254.67 12/31/2017 101-43127-421990 01/06/2018 Aramark - shop towels Nov. 2017 299.32 12/31/2017 101-43127-421990 01/06/2018 Dyna - cryobit fract red shank; (200) eble ties; (2 150.27 12/31/2017 101-43127-421990 01/06/2018 Runnings -chainsaw; (2) 25' ext. cord 199.97 12/31/2017 101-43127-421990 01/06/2018 Runnings - (3) lock pins; (2) hitch pins; IOpk lyr 22.34 01/15/2018 101-43127-421990 01/06/2018 Runnings - (2) dip brush head & handle 31.98 01/15/2018 101-43127-421990 01/06/2018 Runnings - (4) adapters 29.96 01/15/2018 101-43127-422100 01/06/2018 Monti Napa - #112- #AR394 Relay 21.90 12/31/2017 101-43127-422110 01/06/2018 Monti Napa - shop supplies- asst. filters 368.05 12/31/2017 101-43127-422120 01/06/2018 Home Depot -PW office - plumbing supplies 13.11 12/31/2017 101-43127-422300 01/06/2018 Home Depot - PW office - 621b joint comp; 1 ga 29.27 12/31/2017 101-43127-422300 01/06/2018 Home Depot - PW office -int. door; (3) drywall 113.79 12/31/2017 101-43127-422300 01/06/2018 Home Depot - PW office -(2) saw blade; tape me 119.64 12/31/2017 101-43127-422300 01/06/2018 Home Depot - PW office - (2) 50 pc bits; (14) stl 270.12 12/31/2017 101-43127-422300 01/06/2018 Shenvin Williams - PW office (5) 5 gal paint; 1 1 245.04 01/15/2018 101-43127-422300 01/06/2018 DSG - (2) urinal kit; (2) drvr stop repair kit; etc 58.03 12/31/2017 101-43127-422990 01/06/2018 Runnings - Backpak Blower; sprayer 679.90 12/31/2017 101-43127-424100 01/06/2018 Monti Vacuum Cntr- Themax CP3; (3) qts. sham 738.85 12/31/2017 101-43127-424100 01/06/2018 Horsy MN- Undercarriage Hurricane Pro 1,916.70 12/31/2017 101-43127-424100 01/06/2018 Northern Tool - Concrete Screed; (2) screed bar; 2,579.97 12/31/2017 101-43127-424100 01/06/2018 Cub - hand soap; laundry soap; paper towls 52.45 12/31/2017 101-42200-421100 01/06/2018 Streieher's - set up fee - logo on Class B uniform 100.00 12/31/2017 101-42200-421120 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (01/17/2018 - 11:24 AM) Page 3 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 01/06/2018 Streicher's - sues; (2) safety badge; Pants; etc 705.89 12/31/2017 101-42200-421120 01/06/2018 Streicher's - (28) pants; (33) shirts; (33) jacket w 6,895.00 12/31/2017 101-42200-421120 01/06/2018 Kwik Trip - small engine fuel- Fire 26.68 01/15/2018 101-42200-421200 01/06/2018 Amazon - (3) 1 gal. fuel additive 23.55 12/31/2017 101-42200-421300 01/06/2018 Amazon -cs. Plug n' Dike; Litmus slips; Goo Go 53.40 12/31/2017 101-42200-421990 01/06/2018 Home Depot - 12pak 65W LED; 2 1/2 T. Husky 140.04 12/31/2017 101-42200-421990 01/06/2018 Cub - (3) case water bottles 7.50 12/31/2017 101-42200-421990 01/06/2018 Amazon - credit voucher - Fire -3.99 12/31/2017 101-42200-421990 01/06/2018 Streicher's - credit lights for Engine -77.98 12/31/2017 101-42200-422100 01/06/2018 Home Depot - 20A connector; 4pc nutdriver set; 35.58 01/15/2018 101-42200-422100 01/06/2018 Home Depot -(4) 15Aconnector;(4) 15Astraigl 99.24 01/15/2018 101-42200-422100 01/06/2018 Cabela's - Squad #5 & ATV- (2) chargers 196.30 12/31/2017 101-42200-422110 01/06/2018 LightingSupply.com - (2) 750w Halogen- Fire 26.65 12/31/2017 101-42200-422110 01/06/2018 Monti Napa - Bulb - Fire Dept. 15.08 01/15/2018 101-42200-422110 01/06/2018 Nighthawk -Jan. 2018 Security Monitor/Cellula 49.95 01/15/2018 101-42200-431900 01/06/2018 Verizon - Oct 21 - Nov 20 140.04 12/31/2017 101-42200-432100 01/06/2018 Target - Food for 12/11 Special Council Meeting 23.99 12/31/2017 101-41110-443990 01/06/2018 Amazon - Coffee, Paper Plates, Cups, Paper To" 170.88 12/31/2017 101-41310-421990 01/06/2018 Amazon- Coffee 87.68 12/31/2017 101-41310-421990 01/06/2018 NBP- Paper, Folders, Letter Opener 263.89 12/31/2017 101-41310-421990 01/06/2018 NBP - Certificate Holder 53.95 12/31/2017 101-41310-421990 01/06/2018 NBP - Clips, Calculator, Pocket Folders 50.04 12/31/2017 101-41310-421990 01/06/2018 Amazon - Dynamo Label Printer 159.99 12/31/2017 101-41310-421990 01/06/2018 Amazon - Black Ink for Large Format Printer 66.00 01/15/2018 101-41310-421990 01/06/2018 Amazon - Blue Ink for Large Format Printer 72.80 01/15/2018 101-41310-421990 01/06/2018 Amazon -Coffee 61.98 01/15/2018 101-41310-421990 01/06/2018 Amazon - Battery Backup & Surge Protector (3) 297.00 01/15/2018 101-41310-421990 01/06/2018 NBP - Staples, Scissors, File Organizer, Laminat 82.70 01/15/2018 101-41310-421990 01/06/2018 Randys - Monthly Shredding Service (CH) 18.00 12/31/2017 101-41310-431990 01/06/2018 Trusted Employees - Nov Background Checks (1 29.85 12/31/2017 101-41310-431990 01/06/2018 Trusted Employees - Dec Background Checks (2 46.00 12/31/2017 101-41310-431990 01/06/2018 Monti Chamber of Commerce - 2nd Business Mi 400.00 12/31/2017 101-41310-443300 01/06/2018 Monti Chamber of Commerce - DecLunch(RL) 15.00 12/31/2017 101-41310-443990 01/06/2018 Monti Chamber of Commerce - Nov Lunch (JT) 15.00 12/31/2017 213-46301-443300 01/06/2018 MN Econ. Dev. Assoc - 2018 Membership (JT) 295.00 01/15/2018 213-46301-443300 01/06/2018 Monti Chamber of Commerce - Dec Lunch (JT) 15.00 12/31/2017 213-46301-443300 01/06/2018 Domino's Pizza - Food for 12/13 EDA Special N 31.81 12/31/2017 213-46301-443990 01/06/2018 Holiday - Unleaded Fuel 10.581 gals Cd! $2.499 26.44 12/31/2017 217-41990-421200 01/06/2018 Holiday - Unleaded Fuel 9.635 gals 0u $2.369 22.83 12/31/2017 217-41990-421200 01/06/2018 Holiday - Unleaded Fuel 9.467 gals (d; $2.319 21.95 12/31/2017 217-41990-421200 01/06/2018 Holiday - Unleaded Fuel 9.528 gals Ca; $2.359 22.48 12/31/2017 217-41990-421200 01/06/2018 G & K - inv# 6043126550 15.60 12/31/2017 217-41990-421990 01/06/2018 Holiday - Windshield Washer Fluid 3.43 12/31/2017 217-41990-421990 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (01/17/2018 - 11:24 AM) Page 4 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 01/06/2018 Schwaab - Dater Stamp 83.63 12/31/2017 217-41990-421990 01/06/2018 NBP - Paper, Calculator Paper, Post Its, Bandage 51.17 12/31/2017 217-41990-421990 01/06/2018 NBP - Paper, Post Its, Tape 62.18 12/31/2017 217-41990-421990 01/06/2018 NBP - Staples, Clasp Envelopes 24.48 12/31/2017 217-41990-421990 01/06/2018 Monti Napa - #800- brake pads; (2) brake rotor - 101.86 12/31/2017 217-41990-421990 01/06/2018 NewEgg.com - Scanner 220.99 12/31/2017 217-41990-421990 01/06/2018 Walmart - Bags 6.81 12/31/2017 217-41990-421990 01/06/2018 WHCF - DMV 19.95 12/31/2017 217-41990-431900 01/06/2018 Randys - Monthly Shredding Service (DMV) 18.00 12/31/2017 217-41990-431990 01/06/2018 Trusted Employees - Nov Background Checks (? 97.00 12/31/2017 217-41990-431990 01/06/2018 Advanced Disposal - Nov 2017 47.74 12/31/2017 101-45201-438400 01/06/2018 Advanced Disposal -Nov 2017 23.87 12/31/2017 101-45201-438400 01/06/2018 Advanced Disposal - Nov 2017 23.87 12/31/2017 101-45201-438400 01/06/2018 Aramark - uniforms Nov. 2017 - Parks 197.67 12/31/2017 101-45201-441700 01/06/2018 Belson Outdoors- (40) dome top for 42 gal recep 2,745.97 12/31/2017 101-45203-421990 01/06/2018 Advanced Disposal - Nov 2017 110.80 12/31/2017 101-43127-438400 01/06/2018 WHCE -Gen. Street Lighting 1,297.45 12/31/2017 101-43160-438100 01/06/2018 Advanced Disposal -Nov 2017 38,827.08 12/31/2017 101-43230-438400 01/06/2018 Advanced Disposal - Nov 2017 - Recycling 12,913.70 12/31/2017 101-43230-438400 01/06/2018 Impark - Parking Gov't IT Symposium St.Paul 10.00 12/31/2017 101-00000-115030 01/06/2018 Ausco- MCC Staff Apparel 214.50 12/31/2017 101-00000-115030 01/06/2018 Edible Arrangements - FRAUD - Credit Pending 143.00 12/31/2017 101-00000-115030 01/06/2018 Holiday - Personal Purchases Made on City Car( 15.00 12/31/2017 101-00000-115030 01/06/2018 Holiday - Personal Purchases Made on City Car( 14.95 12/31/2017 101-00000-115030 01/06/2018 Zara.com - FRAUD - Credit Pending 141.53 12/31/2017 101-00000-115030 01/06/2018 Royal Tire - Engine #1- repair front tire 112.35 01/15/2018 101-42200-440500 01/06/2018 MN Dept Labor - Qtr 4 2017 Bldg Pen -nit Surch: -108.73 01/15/2018 101-42400-343000 01/06/2018 Fleet Farm - Boots (RS) 75.99 12/31/2017 101-42400-421110 01/06/2018 Verizon - Nov 4 - Dec 3 50.84 12/31/2017 101-42400-432100 01/06/2018 U of Cont Ed - 2018 Bldg Official Classes (3 445.00 01/15/2018 101-42400-433100 01/06/2018 U of M Cont Ed - 2018 Bldg Official Classes (2 320.00 01/15/2018 101-42400-433100 01/06/2018 U of M Cont Gd - 2018 Bldg Official Classes (3 375.00 01/15/2018 101-42400-433100 01/06/2018 Walmart - New Rear Michelin Tire 152.50 12/31/2017 101-42400-440500 01/06/2018 MN Dept Labor - Bldg Official License (JR #00: 65.00 01/15/2018 101-42400-443700 01/06/2018 D Michael B's - Area Finance Lunch (DD & SR) 22.20 12/31/2017 101-41520-433100 01/06/2018 Wall Street Journal - Monthly Subscription (WO 36.99 12/31/2017 101-41520-443300 01/06/2018 Walmart - Framer for Volunteer Certificate 9.87 12/31/2017 101-41800-421990 01/06/2018 Runnings - Gift Card for Safety Bingo 25.00 12/31/2017 101-41800-421990 01/06/2018 Cub - Food for Training 73.53 12/31/2017 101-41800-443990 01/06/2018 Runnings - Snacks for Meeting 7.99 12/31/2017 101-41800-443990 01/06/2018 Subway - Food for Training 90,20 12/31/2017 101-41800-443990 01/06/2018 Home Depot - 120W Bulb for Senior Center 19.97 12/31/2017 101-45175-421990 01/06/2018 Shoe Menders -boots- L.S. Parks 90.00 12/31/2017 101-45201-420650 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (01/17/2018 - 11:24 AM) Page 5 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 01/06/2018 Grady's - (3) 10.2 oz glue 17.97 12/31/2017 101-45201-421650 01/06/2018 Fastenal - (12) Insl. Gloves; (50) tapblt; mise. sn 198.17 12/31/2017 101-45201-421650 01/06/2018 Runnings - 4pc- truck floor mats: Pry bar; dig. N 169.78 12/31/2017 101-45201-421650 01/06/2018 Fastenal - XL Pro Flex 9251`: (2) Gloves - Parks 57.40 12/31/2017 101-45201-421650 01/06/2018 Fastenal - (350) 5/16" x 1 1/2 Giv, HxLg 43.54 12/31/2017 101-45201-422100 01/06/2018 Fastenal -#221 Toro broom tap bolts 18.28 12/31/2017 101-45201-422100 01/06/2018 Monti Napa -(2) sealer; primer 67.70 12/31/2017 101-45201-422100 01/06/2018 Grady's-#212 radio hardware 6.10 12/31/2017 101-45201-422110 01/06/2018 Paypal- 2pk Aqua Pure filter cartridge - Michma, 62.50 12/31/2017 101-45201-422990 01/06/2018 WHCE - 2171 W River St - Parks 36.45 12/31/2017 101-45201-431900 01/06/2018 WHCE -107 River St. - Parks 19.95 12/31/2017 101-45201-431900 01/06/2018 Trusted Employees - Nov Background Checks (1 23.00 12/31/2017 101-45201-431990 01/06/2018 Allied Parking - Greens Expo parking- TP Parks 10.00 01/15/2018 101-45201-433100 01/06/2018 Advanced Disposal - Nov 2017 23.87 12/31/2017 609-49754-438400 01/06/2018 Monti Chamber of Commerce - 2nd Business Mi 100.00 12/31/2017 217-41990-443300 01/06/2018 MN Dept Labor - Qtr 4 2017 Bldg Permit SurcN 2,718.15 01/15/2018 101-00000-208110 01/06/2018 Advanced Disposal - Nov 2017 208.87 12/31/2017 226-45126-438400 01/06/2018 Vistaprint - Birthday Party Invitation Cards (100 64.42 12/31/2017 226-45127-421460 01/06/2018 Vistaprint - Sales Tax Refund -4.44 12/31/2017 226-45127-421460 01/06/2018 Walmart - Birthday Party Cupcakes 14.33 12/31/2017 226-45127-421460 01/06/2018 Net Brands Media - Wristbands for Birthday Par 203.00 12/31/2017 226-45127-421460 01/06/2018 2nd Wind Exercise - Replacement Bench 717.33 12/31/2017 226-45127-421720 01/06/2018 Amazon - Risers for Steps (15) 305.40 12/31/2017 226-45127-421720 01/06/2018 Walmart.com - Toys for Childcare Area 365.38 12/31/2017 226-45127-421730 01/06/2018 Walmart - Kids Scissors (17 prs) 1.70 12/31/2017 226-45127-421981 01/06/2018 Advanced Disposal - Nov 2017 113.38 12/31/2017 602-49480-438400 01/06/2018 Offfice Depot- (5) rnd. label; (5) 1/4" label 44.45 12/31/2017 602-49490-421990 01/06/2018 Monti Vacuum Cntr- Riccar; bags- 1/2 Sewer 129.97 12/31/2017 602-49490-421990 01/06/2018 Monti Napa - lamp 4.29 12/31/2017 602-49490-422100 01/06/2018 Grady's - spring etx; (2) ft. tube 6.09 12/31/2017 602-49490-422100 01/06/2018 CWP Enterprises - cross bracket 15.86 12/31/2017 602-49490-422100 01/06/2018 Home Depot - 3"x10' pvc pipe; repair coupling; 23.66 12/31/2017 602-49490-422100 01/06/2018 Runnings - (12) brake parts clnr; 1 gal. lime rem 49.99 12/31/2017 602-49490-422100 01/06/2018 Verizon - Nov 4 - Dec 3 46.11 12/31/2017 602-49490-432100 01/06/2018 WHCE - Sunset Ponds I l-/-12/1/2017 925 kWh 121.60 12/31/2017 602-49490-438100 01/06/2018 WHCE - 1645 & 1675 CR 39 32.96 12/31/2017 602-49490-438100 01/06/2018 Aramark - uniforms Nov. 2017 - Sewer 110.54 12/31/2017 602-49490-441700 01/06/2018 NBP - suckers; dz. lgl pads; cleaner; etc 208.68 12/31/2017 609-49754-421990 01/06/2018 NBP - (4) receipt tape 256.46 12/31/2017 609-49754-421990 01/06/2018 NBP - (2) surge protector 94.05 12/31/2017 609-49754-421990 01/06/2018 NBP - disinfect. wipes; gal. cleaner; (2) gloves e 142.43 12/31/2017 609-49754-421990 01/06/2018 WHCE -Hi-Way Liquors - Jan 2018 21.42 12/31/2017 609-49754-431900 01/06/2018 Trusted Employees - Nov Background Checks (: 59.70 12/31/2017 609-49754-431990 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (01/17/2018 - 11:24 AM) Page 6 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 01/06/2018 G & K - Inv# 6043138076; 6043132344 108.76 12/31/2017 609-49754-431990 01/06/2018 G & K - Inv# 6043155363; 6043149590; 60431 161.80 12/31/2017 609-49754-431990 01/06/2018 DISH - Jan. 2018 service 64.16 01/15/2018 609-49754-432500 01/06/2018 Cub - resale - (20) limes 10.00 12/31/2017 609-49750-425500 01/06/2018 Cub - resale - (30) limes 23.70 12/31/2017 609-49750-425500 01/06/2018 Cub - resale - (36) limes; (12) lemons 29.38 12/31/2017 609-49750-425500 01/06/2018 Arctic Glacier - resale inv #1957733108; 88.47 12/31/2017 609-49750-425500 01/06/2018 Arctic Glacier - resale inv #1957734509; 35206 228.56 12/31/2017 609-49750-425500 01/06/2018 Cub - resale - (35) limes 17.50 12/31/2017 609-49750-425500 01/06/2018 Cub - resale - (20) Limes; (10) Lemons 19.90 01/15/2018 609-49750-425500 01/06/2018 Monti Chamber of Commerce - Membership Du 165.00 12/31/2017 101-45501-443300 01/06/2018 Runnings - Back Pak blower- Stihl parts 95.47 12/31/2017 101-46102-421990 01/06/2018 MN Econ. Dev. Assoc - 2018 Winter Conference 275.00 01/15/2018 213-46301-433100 01/06/2018 Dacotah Paper - Soap 51.72 12/31/2017 101-45501-421990 01/06/2018 Dacotah Paper - Refund Cleaning Supplies -35.58 12/31/2017 101-45501-421990 01/06/2018 Home Depot - Foamcore Pipe & Couplings to Ri 12.36 12/31/2017 101-45501-422990 01/06/2018 G & K - h v# 6043132346, 6043143868 39,20 12/31/2017 101-45501-431990 01/06/2018 Advanced Disposal -Nov 2017 11 .93 12/31/2017 101-45501-431990 01/06/2018 Walmart - Dish Soap 9.36 12/31/2017 226-45122-421990 01/06/2018 Walmart - Bulletin Board Fabric 11.88 12/31/2017 226-45122-421990 01/06/2018 Walmart - Fabric for Bulletin Board 21.04 12/31/2017 226-45122-421990 01/06/2018 Walmart - Tweezer 2.82 12/31/2017 226-45122-421990 01/06/2018 Amazon - Batteries AAA (36 Ct), AA (48 Ct) 33.97 12/31/2017 226-45122-421990 01/06/2018 NBP - Paper, Tape, Paper Clips 55.68 12/31/2017 226-45122-421990 01/06/2018 Amazon - Velcro, Bulletin Board, Packing Tape 40.96 12/31/2017 226-45122-421990 01/06/2018 Amazon - Acrylic Sign Holders (2) 59.98 12/31/2017 226-45122-421990 01/06/2018 Price Chopper - Bulk Wristbands Order (300K) 5,419.00 12/31/2017 226-45122-421990 01/06/2018 Amazon - Addt'l Set of Walkie Talkies for Staff t 64.99 12/31/2017 226-45122-421990 01/06/2018 NBP - Paper, Pens, Pouches 70.36 01/15/2018 226-45122-421990 01/06/2018 Amazon - Barcode Scanner for Guest Services 73.00 01/15/2018 226-45122-421990 01/06/2018 Constant Contact - Monthly Email Subscription 65.00 12/31/2017 226-45122-430900 01/06/2018 Fastenal - (4) SHCS 4-40 x 3/8 0.32 12/31/2017 601-49440-421990 01/06/2018 Home Depot - bernzomatic torch kit 54.97 12/31/2017 601-49440-421990 01/06/2018 Grady's -muriatic acid - 1 gal.; scrubber 12.58 12/31/2017 601-49440-421990 01/06/2018 Fleet Farm -(3) 6v- Alarm system batteries 28.54 12/31/2017 601-49440-421990 01/06/2018 RCP - (10) 100/bx circular chart; (6) 5pk pens - 310.56 12/31/2017 601-49440-421990 01/06/2018 Monti Napa - Battery- Generator Booster Station 166.06 12/31/2017 601-49440-422100 01/06/2018 McMaster -Carr- Brass Precision Flow-Adj. Valv 223.13 01/15/2018 601-49440-422100 01/06/2018 Monti Vacuum Cntr- Riccar; bags- 1/2 Water 129.98 12/31/2017 601-49440-422300 01/06/2018 Grady's - key 0.50 12/31/2017 601-49440-422700 01/06/2018 Runnings - wire brush; circular end hex brush 9.98 12/31/2017 601-49440-422700 01/06/2018 Home Depot - (4) 501b. play sand 11.88 12/31/2017 601-49440-422700 01/06/2018 Home Depot - 12'x400' painters plastic 24.98 12/31/2017 601-49440-422700 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (01/17/2018 - 11:24 AM) Page 7 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 01/06/2018 Home Depot - (2) 116oz. Behr paint 61.94 01/15/2018 601-49440-422700 01/06/2018 WHCE - 5980 Jason Ave NE 19.95 12/31/2017 601-49440-431900 01/06/2018 WHCE - 207 Chelsea Rd - Water 32.95 12/31/2017 601-49440-431900 01/06/2018 WHCE - 209 Cedar St- Water 29.95 12/31/2017 601-49440-431900 01/06/2018 WHCE - 132 E Broadway- Water 29.95 12/31/2017 601-49440-431900 01/06/2018 WHCE - 200 Dundas Rd - Water Jan 2018 29.95 12/31/2017 601-49440-431900 01/06/2018 Verizon - Nov 4 - Dec 3 46.11 12/31/2017 601-49440-432100 01/06/2018 Aramark - uniforms Nov. 2017 - Water 110.54 12/31/2017 601-49440-441700 01/06/2018 Trusted Employees - Nov Background Checks (d 46.00 12/31/2017 226-45122-431990 01/06/2018 Verizon - Nov 4 - Dec 3 31.38 12/31/2017 226-45122-432100 01/06/2018 Monti Chamber of Commerce - Dec Lunch (AM 15.00 12/31/2017 226-45122-433100 01/06/2018 Monti Chamber of Commerce - 2nd Business Mi 100.00 12/31/2017 226-45122-443300 01/06/2018 Wahnart - ZipTies & Markers 17.85 12/31/2017 226-45123-421460 01/06/2018 Amazon - Foosballs 35.96 01/15/2018 226-45123-421460 01/06/2018 Paula Paulson - Wedding Ceiling Drape 425.00 12/31/2017 226-45123-431990 01/06/2018 Red Cross Store - Lifeguarding Manuals (2) 76.27 12/31/2017 226-45124-421990 01/06/2018 Wahnart.com - Infant Life Vests (12) 240,24 12/31/2017 226-45124-421990 01/06/2018 Sprint Aquatics - Floating Fins (9 prs) 211.97 12/31/2017 226-45124-421990 01/06/2018 Marine Rescue Prod - Fanny Pack (3) & Spine B 71.75 12/31/2017 226-45124-421990 01/06/2018 Ausco - Staff Apparel 250.50 12/31/2017 226-45125-421110 01/06/2018 Dacotah Paper- Concession Supplies: Gloves, H 89.74 12/31/2017 226-45125-421990 01/06/2018 Walmart - Thermometers (2) 10.94 12/31/2017 226-45125-421990 01/06/2018 Dacotah Paper - Concession Supplies: Gloves, C 202.87 12/31/2017 226-45125-421990 01/06/2018 Dacotah Paper - Concession Supplies: Straws, P< 74.44 12/31/2017 226-45125-421990 01/06/2018 Wahnart - Birthday Parry Cupcakes 23.92 12/31/2017 226-45125-425410 01/06/2018 Walmart - Protein Bars 33.39 12/31/2017 226-45125-425410 01/06/2018 Walmart - Swim Diapers (28 pkgs) 249.28 12/31/2017 226-45125-425411 01/06/2018 Walmart - Protein Bars (5 boxes) 23.85 12/31/2017 226-45125-425411 01/06/2018 Amazon - Jump Ropes for Resale (15) 150.00 12/31/2017 226-45125-425411 01/06/2018 Holiday - Unleaded Fuel 17.268 gals (m $2.499 42.29 12/31/2017 226-45126-421200 01/06/2018 Holiday - Unleaded Fuel 5 gals (m $2.849 - For 14.24 12/31/2017 226-45126-421200 01/06/2018 Grady's - Grease Gun & Grease for Snow Machi 29.58 12/31/2017 226-45126-421990 01/06/2018 Dacotah Paper - Bathroom & Locker Room Supl 868.36 12/31/2017 226-45126-421990 01/06/2018 Monti Napa - Cleaner for Showers 9.89 12/31/2017 226-45126-421990 01/06/2018 Sharps Inc - Container for Needles 192.24 12/31/2017 226-45126-421990 01/06/2018 Dacotah Paper - Bathroom & Locker Room Supl 769.10 12/31/2017 226-45126-421990 01/06/2018 Dacotah Paper - Bathroom & Locker Room Supl 257.66 12/31/2017 226-45126-421990 01/06/2018 ThyssenKrupp - Oil & Grease 5/1/17 - 1/31/18 (; 565.06 12/31/2017 226-45126-422990 01/06/2018 Runnings - Poly Pump for Chemicals 39.99 12/31/2017 226-45126-422990 01/06/2018 Home Depot - Hand Held Salt Spreader 15.97 12/31/2017 226-45126-422990 01/06/2018 Fleet Farm - Pliers 5.89 12/31/2017 226-45126-422990 01/06/2018 Grady's - 250W Bulbs for Mississippi Room (2) 17.98 12/31/2017 226-45126-422990 01/06/2018 Monti Napa - Serpentine Belt for C30 Bike 21.72 12/31/2017 226-45126-422990 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (01/17/2018 - 11:24 AM) Page 8 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number 01/06/2018 Grady's - Flat Head Cap Screws for Bench (5) 3.75 12/31/2017 226-45126-422990 01/06/2018 Home Depot - 5/16" Washer for Elliptical Repan 1.18 12/31/2017 226-45126-422990 01/06/2018 Grady's - 12" Hose Grease Gun 7.59 12/31/2017 226-45126-422990 01/06/2018 Grady's - Glue 4.59 12/31/2017 226-45126-422990 01/06/2018 Grady's - Washers (4); Double Sided Tape - For 1 6.51 12/31/2017 226-45126-422990 01/06/2018 Grady's - Poly Tubing (60 fl) - For Pool 16.20 12/31/2017 226-45126-422990 01/06/2018 Grady's - Misc Hardware for Treadmill 11.99 12/31/2017 226-45126-422990 01/06/2018 Monti General Rental - CO2 Tank - To Clean Re 36.30 01/15/2018 226-45126-422990 01/06/2018 Home Depot - Flood Light Bulbs for Warehouse 22.97 01/15/2018 226-45126-422990 01/06/2018 Grady's - Stoppers; Velcro Tape for Fitness Equi] 34.67 12/31/2017 226-45126-422990 01/06/2018 ThyssenKrupp- Elevator Maint5/1/17-1/31/18 1,183.40 12/31/2017 226-45126-431900 01/06/2018 WHCE - MCC 27.95 12/31/2017 226-45126-431900 01/06/2018 WHCE -MCC - Jan 2018 19.95 12/31/2017 226-45126-431900 01/06/2018 G & K - Inv# 6043132345, 6043138077, 604314 133.99 12/31/2017 226-45126-431990 01/06/2018 Trusted Employees - Dec Background Checks (4 94.00 12/31/2017 226-45126-431990 Check Total: 120,553.11 Vendor: 2438 VANCO SERVICES LLC Check Sequence: 7 00008678494 Vanco - Gateway Exchange - December 2017 58.06 12/31/2017 601-49440-443980 00008678494 Vanco - Gateway Exchange - December 2017 58.06 12/31/2017 602-49490-443980 00008678494 Vanco - Gateway Exchange - December 2017 14.82 12/31/2017 656-00000-202099 Check Total: 130.94 Total for Check Run: 1,239,509.05 Total of Number of Checks: 7 Reference ACH Enabled: True The preceding list of bills payable was reviewed and approved for payment. Date: 1/22/18 Approved by Mayor Brian Stumpf AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (01/17/2018 - 11:24 AM) Page 9 City Council Agenda: 1/22/18 2B. Consideration of approving new hires and departures for Citv departments (TE) I�I 1,13 01917 Noce W.1101 )a lix' sM1I ,111001 The Council is asked to ratify the hiring and departures of employees that have occurred recently in the departments listed. It is recommended that the Council officially ratify the hiring/departure of all listed employees including part-time and seasonal workers. By ratifying departures, the council also approves the expenditure for final amounts due to terminated and otherwise departing employees. Al. Budget Impact: (positions are generally included in budget) A2. Staff Work Load Impact: If new positions, there may be some training involved. If terminated positions, existing staff would pick up those hours, as needed, until replaced. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to ratify the hire/departures of the employees as identified on the attached list. 2. Motion to deny the recommended hires and departures. C. RECOMMENDATION: By statute the City Council has the authority to approve all hires/departures. City staff recommends Alternative # 1, for the Council to approve the hires and/or departures as listed. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • List of new/terminated employees NEW EMPLOYEES Name Title Department Hire Date Nicole Wilson Group Fitness Instructor MCC 1/3/2018 PT Stephanie Duszynski Membership Specialist MCC 1/8/2018 PT Jena Christopherson Guest Service MCC 1/12/2018 PT TERMINATING EMPLOYEES Name Reason Department Last Day Renee Kasper Voluntary MCC 8/18/17 PT Sadie Wilkes Voluntary MCC 9/29/17 PT Ellie Engstrom Voluntary MCC 11/25/17 PT Ella Maus Voluntary MCC 11/26/17 PT Jayden Wistrom Involuntary MCC 12/15/17 PT Anthony Benecke Voluntary MCC 1/8/18 FT New Hire and Terms City Council 2018.xlsx: 1/18/2018 Class Class City Council Agenda: 01/22/2018 2C. Consideration of approving sale or disposal of surplus property (WO) /� 9 9111916 lrl► 4 W.11►1171YXI G lI T6106111� The Council is asked to declare certain items as surplus property and authorize the sale or disposal of those items. The MCC has a video camera, wires/cords, and a card reader that they wish to release. The video camera can possibly be sold. The other items will be disposed of. Al. Budget Impact: Varies by the value of the property. A2. Staff Work Load Impact: Depends on the value of the property. Some items will be shopped as salvage; other items may go to auction or sold via formal bids or informal bids. State contracting laws will govern in absence of city policy. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the sale or disposal of surplus property as identified on the attached lists. 2. Motion to deny the sale or disposal of surplus property as recommended. C. RECOMMENDATION: Staff Recommends Option 1 to approve the sale or disposal of surplus property as identified. A. Surplus List B. Photos 1 Equipment/Supplies Surplus List Department: MCC 1. $100,000 + A. B. 2. $50,000 - $100,000 A. B. 3. $25,000.00 - $50,000.00 A. B. 4. $10,000 - $25,000 A. B. C. 5. $2,500 - $10,000 A. B. C. 6. $1,000 - $2,500 A B. C. 7. $100 - $1,000 A. Video Camera B. C. 8. $0-$100 A. Wires/Cords B. Card Reader C. Date: 1/22/2018 �,r FiAllf''All'a FAMF I I T toe T,27 0 City Council Agenda — 01/22/18 D. Consideration to approve appointment of Olive (011ie) White to EDA for term endine on 12-31-2018 (JT) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Per the FDA's Enabling Resolution and By Laws, members recommended for appointment to the EDA are to be formally appointed/ratified by the City Council. As you are already aware, long-time EDA member, Bill Demeules, ended his term effective 12-31-2017. The vacancy was posted and two applications were received with one of them eventually being withdrawn due to potential conflicts of interest. The remaining applicant was interviewed by the full EDA in a workshop setting and unanimously recommended as a replacement for Bill Demeules. That applicant is 011ie Koropchak White. The remainder of Mr. Demeules term is through 12-31-2018. Al. STAFF IMPACT: There is minimal staff impact in considering approving the appointment of Ms. White as a replacement member on the EDA in the spot formerly held by Bill Demeules. Staff time consists of reviewing the EDA Enabling Resolution and By Laws and preparing a report for City Council ratification. A2. BUDGET IMPACT: There is no budgetary impact from the consideration of appointing 011ie White to the EDA. Her appointment will bring the commission's membership to its full roster of seven members. As of this point in time, EDA members do not receive a meeting stipend. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the appointment of 011ie White to the EDA to a term ending on 12-31-2018. 2. Motion to table or deny approving the appointment of 011ie White to the EDA. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approving the appointment of 011ie White to the EDA, bringing the membership back to a full compliment of seven. Ms. White's extensive experience in community and economic development activities over her many working years will be of significant value to staff and other EDA members. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. EDA Enabling Resolution B. EDA By Laws C. Resignation Letter from Bill Demeules D. Application from 011ie White to serve on EDA CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2012-021 AMENDED AND RESTATED RESOLUTION ENABLING THE CREATION OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BEITRESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota ("City") as follows: Section 1. Background and Bindings 1.01. The City is authorized by Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.090 to 469.1081 (the "EDA Act") to establish an economic development authority to coordinate and administer economic development and redevelopment plans and programs for the City. 1.02. By Ordinance No. 172, approved April 10, 1989 and codified in the City Code as Title I1, Chapter 3 (the "Enabling Ordinance"), the City established the City of Monticello Economic Development Authority ("EDA"), for the purpose of coordinating and administering economic development activities in and for the City. 1.03. By resolutions approved on October 22, 2007 and January 14, 2008, the City transferred to the EDA the control, authority and operation of all projects administered by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Monticello and adopted an Amended and Restated Enabling Resolution (the "Enabling Resolution"), which superceded the Enabling Ordinance in all respects. 1.04. The City Council has now determined to revise and clarify certain provisions of the Enabling Resolution by the adoption of this resolution. 1.05. The City Council has, in accordance with Minnesota Statutes Section 469.093, provided public notice and conducted a public hearing on the date hereof, at which all persons wishing to be heard were given an opportunity to express their views, concerning the modified Enabling Resolution. 1.06. This resolution constitutes an amendment and restatement of the Enabling Resolution of January 14, 2008, and supercedes such Enabling Resolution in all respects. Section 2. Enabling Authority. 2.01. The EDA was established pursuant to the EDA Act under the Enabling Ordinance as adopted April 10, 1989 and codified as Title II, Chapter 3 of the City Code, as amended and restated by this resolution. 2.02. The EDA shall be composed of 7 members to be appointed by the Mayor and confirmed by the City Council. 2,03. Two of the members shall be members of the City Council. The terms of office of the two members of the City Council shall coincide with their terms of office as members of the City Council. The remaining five (5) members shall be initially appointed for terms of one, two, three, four, and five years respectively. Thereafter, all non -Council members shall be appointed for six-year terms, 2,04. A vacancy is created in the membership of the EDA when a City Council member of the board of commissioners ends Council membership, when any member ends EDA membership prior to expiration of his or her term of office, on the day following the expiration of a member's term of office, or when a member is removed by the City Council subject to the terms of Section 2.07 hereof . A vacancy for this or any other reason must be filled for a new term or the balance of the unexpired term, as applicable, in the manner in which the original appointment was made. 2.05. All of the members who are not members of the City Council must be either residents of the City, business -owners in the City, or property -owners in the City. 2.06. All members shall serve at the pleasure of the City Council, subject to the terms of Section 2.07 hereof. Vacancies shall be filled by appointment by the Mayor with the confirmation of the City Council. 2.07. A commissioner may be removed by the City Council for inefficiency, neglect of duty, or misconduct in office. A commissioner shall be removed only after a hearing. A copy of the charges must be given to the corrunissioner at least 10 days before the hearing. The commissioner must be given an opportunity to be heard in person or by the counsel at the hearing. When written charges have been submitted against the commissioner, the City Council may temporarily suspend the commissioner. If the City Council finds that those charges have not been substantiated, the commissioner shall be immediately reinstated. If a commissioner is removed, a record of the proceedings together with the charges and findings shall be filed in the office of the City Administrator, 2.08, The City Council shall make available to the EDA such appropriations as it deems fit for salaries, fees, and expenses necessary in the conduct of its work. The EDA shall have authority to expend all budgeted sums so appropriated and recommend the expenditures of other sums made available for its use from grants, gifts, and other sources for the purposes and activities authorized by this resolution. Section 3. Officers and MectW4s. 3,01. The EDA shall elect a president, vice president, treasurer, assistant treasurer, and secretary annually. A member must not serve as president and vice president at the same time. The other offices may be held by the same member. The other offices of the secretary and assistant treasurer need not be held by a member. 3.02. The EDA shall adopt rules and procedures not inconsistent with the provisions of this Enabling Resolution or as provided in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.096, and as may be necessary for the proper execution and conduct of its business. The EDA shall adopt bylaws and rules to govern its procedures and for the transaction of its business and shall keep a record of attendance at its meetings and/or resolutions, transactions, findings, and determinations showing the vote of each member on each question requiring a vote, or if absent or abstaining from voting, indicating such fact. The records of the EDA shall be a public record, except for those items classified by law as nonpublic data. 3.03. The EDA shall meet at least quarterly. Special meetings may be called by the president as needed. 3.04. All administrative procedures, including contract for services, purchases of supplies, and financial transactions and duties shall be outlined in the bylaws of the EDA. Section 4. Staff, 4.01. The Economic Development Director shall be designated as Executive Director of the EDA. 4.02, Subject to limits set by the appropriations or other funds made available, the EDA may employ such staff, technicians, and experts as may be deemed proper, and may incur such other expenses as may be necessary and proper for the conduct of its affairs. Section 5. Functions, Powers. and Duties. 5.01. Except as specifically limited by the provisions of Section 6 of this Enabling Resolution, the EDA shall have the authority granted it pursuant to the EDA Act. 5.02. The EDA shall manage the Greater Monticello Enterprise Fund (the "Fund") the purpose of which is to encourage economic development by making loans to private businesses, The EDA shall make loans to eligible businesses, and such loan(s) shall serve a public purpose as defined in the Greater Monticello Enterprise Fund Guidelines (Fund Guidelines). The Fund Guidelines are hereby adopted by reference and included in the bylaws of the EDA. No changes to the fund Guidelines shall be made without approval of the City Council. 5.03. The EDA may be a limited partner in a partnership whose purpose is consistent with the EDA's purpose. 5,04. The EDA may issue general obligation bonds and revenue bonds when authorized by the City Council and pledge as security for the bonds the full faith, credit, and resources of the City or such revenues as may be generated by projects undertaken by the EDA. 5.05. The EDA may cooperate with or act as agent for the federal or state government or a state public body, or an agency or instrumentality of a government or other public body to carry out the powers granted it by the EDA Act or any other related federal, state, or local law in the area of economic development district improvement, 5.06. The EDA may annually develop and present an economic development strategy and present it to the City Council for consideration and approval. 5.07. The EDA may join an official, industrial, commercial, or trade association or other organization concerned with such purposes, hold reception of officials who may contribute to advancing the City and its economic development, and carry out other appropriate public relations activities to promote the city and its economic development. 5.08. The EDA may perforin such other duties which may be lawfully assigned to it by the City. All city employees shall, upon request and within a reasonable time, filmish the EDA or its employees or agents such available records or information as may be required in its work. The EDA or its employees or agents may, in the performance of official duties, enter upon lands and make examinations or surveys in the same manner as other authorized City agents or employees and shall have such other powers as are required for the performance of official functions in carrying out the purposes of this resolution. Section 6. Limitations of Power. 6.01. The following limits apply to the EDA and its operation: (a) The sale of bonds or other obligations of the EDA must be approved by the City Council. (b) The EDA must follow the budget process for City departments in accordance with City policies, ordinances, and resolutions and the City charter. (c) Development and redevelopment actions of the EDA must be in conformity to the City comprehensive plan and official controls implementing the comprehensive plan. (d) The EDA must submit its plans for development and redevelopment to the City Council for approval in accordance with City planning procedures and laws. (e) Except when previously pledged by the EDA, the City Council may, by resolution, require the EDA to transfer any portion of the reserves generated by activities of the EDA that the City Council determines are not necessary for the successful operation of the EDA to the debt service funds of the city to be used solely to reduce tax levies for bonded indebtedness of the City. (f) The administrative structure and management practices and policies of the EDA must be approved by the City Council. (g) The EDA shall submit all planned activities for influencing the action of any other governmental agency, subdivision, or body to the City Council for approval. 6.02. The EDA may exercise all the powers under the EDA Act, including, but not limited to, the following; (a) all powers under the HRA Act. (b) all powers of a city under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.124 to 469.134. (c) all powers and duties of a redevelopment agency under Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.152 to 469.165 for a purpose in the HRA Act or the EDA Act, and all powers and duties in the HRA Act and the EDA Act for a purpose in Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.152 to 469.165. (d) the authority to acquire property, exercise the right of eminent domain; make contracts for the purpose of redevelopment and economic development; serve as a limited partner in a partnership whose purpose is consistent with the EDA's purpose; buy supplies and materials needed to carry out development within the EDA Act; and operate and maintain public parking facilities. (e) the authority to issue bonds in accordance with the EDA Act and the HRA Act. (f) the authority to levy special benefit taxes in accordance with Section 469.033, subdivision 6 of the HRA Act in order to pay or finance public redevelopment costs (as defined in the LIRA Act), subject to approval by the City Council in accordance with Section 469.033, subdivision 6. (g) all powers under Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.474 to 469.179, 6.03. As provided in the EDA Act, it is the intention of the City Council that nothing in this resolution nor any activities of the EDA are to be construed to impair the obligations of the City or HRA under any of their contracts or to affect in any detrimental manner the rights and privileges of a holder of a bond or other obligation heretofore issued by the City, the EDA or the HRA. Section 7, Implementation. 7.01. The City Council will from time to time and at the appropriate time adopt such ordinances and resolutions as are required and permitted by the EDA Act to give full effect to this resolution. 7.02. The Mayor, the City Administrator, and other appropriate City officials are authorized and directed to take the actions and execute and deliver the documents necessary to give full effect to this resolution. 7.03. Nothing in this resolution is intended to prevent the City from modifying this Enabling Resolution to impose new or different limitations on the EDA as authorized by the EDA Act. ADOPTED BY the City Council of the City of Monticello on this 27th day of February, 2012. CITY OF MONTICELLO Clint Herbst, Mayor ATTEST: ref' '.1, City Administrator 110*11310-01 Section 1. Name of Authoritv. The name of the Authority shall be the "City of Monticello Economic Development Authority." Section 2. Office of Authoritv. The office of the Authority shall be at the City Hall in the City of Monticello, State of Minnesota, but the Authority may hold its meetings at such other place or places as it may designate by resolution. Section 3. Seal of Authoritv. The seal of the Authority shall be in the form of a circle and shall bear the naive of the Authority and the year of its organization. Section 4. Establishment. The City of Monticello Economic Development Authority is established pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.090 to 469. 108 1, as amended. �1141-1 �XIIIITI Section 1. Appointment, Terms, Vacancies, Pav, and Removal. Shall be in accordance with the Amended and Restated Resolution Enabling the Creation of the City of Monticello Economic Development Authority dated October 22, 2007 and as it may be amended (the "Enabling Resolution") and Section 2-3-1 of Ordinance Amendment No. 172, Chapter 3, City of Monticello, Wright County, Minnesota. Section 1. Officers. The Authority shall elect a president, a vice president, a treasurer, a secretary, and an assistant treasurer at the annual meeting. A commissioner must not serve as president and vice president at the same time. The other offices may be held by the same commissioner. The offices of secretary and assistant treasurer need not be held by a commissioner. Section 2. President. The President shall preside at all meetings of the Authority. Except as otherwise authorized by resolution of the Board of Commissioners, the President and the Executive Director (the Assistant Treasurer., in the Executive Director's absence or incapacity) shall sign all contracts, deeds, and other instruments made or executed by the Authority, except that all checks of the Authority shall be signed by the Treasurer and Assistant Treasurer. At each meeting the President shall submit such recommendations and information as he or she may consider proper concerning the business, affairs, and policies of the Authority. Section 3. Vice President. The Vice President shall perform the duties of the President in the absence or incapacity of the President, including signing all contracts, deeds, and other instruments executed by the Authority; and in the case of the resignation or death of the 3255990 MNI MN 190-130 President, the Vice President shall perform such duties as are imposed on the President until such time as the Board shall select a new President. Section 4. Secretary. The Secretary shall keep minutes of all meetings of the Board and shall maintain all records of the Authority. The office of Secretary may be held by the Executive Director upon approval thereof by the Authority. Section 5. Treasurer's Duties. The treasurer: (1) shall receive and is responsible for Authority money; (2) is responsible for the acts of the assistant treasurer; (3) shall disburse Authority money by any Authority -approved method, including without limitation check, wire transfer, or credit card; (4) shall keep an account of the source of all receipts and the nature, purpose, and authority of all disbursements; (5) shall file the Authority's detailed financial statement with its secretary at least once a year at times set by the Authority; and (6) shall prepare and submit an annual report describing the Authority's activities and providing an accurate statement of its financial condition to the City of Monticello by no later than one month following the annual meeting of the Authority. Section 6. Assistant Treasurer. The assistant treasurer has the powers and duties of the treasurer if the treasurer is absent or incapacitated. Section 7. Public Monev. Authority money is public money. Fl�lyll7��-,��iocoillill�-plI The City Administrator, or any other person designated in writing by the City Administrator and approved by a majority of the EDA commissioners, shall be designated as Executive Director of the EDA. Section 1. Duties. The Executive Director shall have general supervision over the administration of the Authority's business and affairs subject to the direction of the Authority. The Executive Director in his or her own name and title shall keep the records of the Authority, shall act as recorder of the meetings of the Authority and record all votes, and shall keep record of the proceedings of the Authority in a journal of proceedings to be kept for such purpose, and shall perform all duties incident to the office. The Executive Director shall, with the President, sign all contracts, deeds, and other instruments executed by the Authority, and shall keep in sole custody the seal of the Authority and shall have power to affix such seal to all contracts and 2 3255990 MNI MN190-130 instruments authorized to be executed by the Authority. Any person appointed to fill the office of Executive Director, or any vacancy herein, shall have such terms as the Authority fixes, but no commissioner of the Authority shall be eligible to serve as the Executive Director. ARTICLE V - MEETINGS Section 1. Rel�ular Meetinas. Regular meetings shall be held on the 2°d Wednesday of each month. Section 2. Annual Meeting. The annual meeting of the Authority shall be held in conjunction with the regular February meeting at the regular meeting place of the Authority. The August regular meeting shall include final fund balances reviewed at the Annual Meeting. Section 3. Special Meetings. Special meetings of the Authority may be called by the President, two members of the Authority, or the Executive Director for the purpose of transacting any business designated in the call. All commissioners of the Authority shall be notified. Section 4. Quorum. At any meeting of the Authority, the presence of four commissioners shall constitute a quorum. If a quorum is not present at any meeting, those present shall have power to adjourn the meeting from time to time without notice other than announcement at such meeting until the requisite number of votes shall be present to constitute a quorum. At any such adjourned meeting at which a quorum is present, any business may be transacted which might have been transacted at the meeting as originally called. Any resolution, election, or other formal action of the Authority shall be adopted upon the affirmative vote of a majority of the Authority membership. Section 5. Rules of Procedure. Unless otherwise specified in the Enabling Resolution or in these bylaws, all meetings of the Authority shall be conducted in accordance with Roberts' Rules of Order reviseil. Section 6. Manner of Voting. The voting on all questions coming before the Authority shall be voice unless the President calls for a roll call vote. The yeas and nays shall be entered upon the minutes of such meetings. Section 1. Em-olovees. Subject to limits set by the appropriations or other funds made available, the Authority may employ such staff, technicians, and experts as may be deemed proper and may incur such other expenses as may be necessary and proper for the conduct of its affairs. Section 2. Contract for Services. The Authority may contract for services of consultants, agents, public accountants, and other persons needed to per,on-n its etaties and exercise its powers. 3 3255990 MNI MN 190-130 Section 3. Leval Services. The Authority may use the services of the city attorney or hire a general counsel for its legal needs. The city attorney or general counsel, as determined by the Authority, is its chief legal advisor. Section 4. Supplies. The Authority may purchase the supplies and materials it needs to carry out its function pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.090 to 469.1081. Section 5. Citv Purchasiniz. The Authority may use the facilities of its city's purchasing department in connection with construction work and to purchase equipment, supplies, or materials. Section 6. City Facilities, Services. The City may furnish offices, structures and space, and stenographic, clerical, engineering, or other assistance to the Authority. Section 7. Delegation Power. The Authority may delegate to one or more of its agents or employees powers or duties as it may deem proper. ARTICLE VII - POWERS Section 1. Functions, Powers. and Duties. Shall be in accordance with the Enabling Resolution. Section 2. Limitations of Power. RMS Shall be in accordance with the Enabling Section 1. Amendment to Bvlaws. The bylaws of the Authority shall be amended by a majority vote of the Authority membership at a regular or special meeting. The amendments must be in written fonn. Section 2. Conflicts. In any instance where these bylaws are in conflict with the Enabling Resolution, the Enabling Resolution shall control. Section 3. Effective Date. These bylaws are effective upon their adoption by the Authority. Signed: President (Seat) xecutive Director 4 3255990 MNI MN 190-130 Bill Demeules 8661 Acacia Ave NE Monticello, MN 55362 11/30/2017 Brian Stumpf Mayor City of Monticello 505 Walnut St Monticello, MN 55362 Jim 'hares Executive Director City of Monticello Economic Development Authority 505 Walnut St Monticello, MN 55362 Dear Brian and Jim, It is with regret that I am writing to inforin you of my decision to resign my position on the Monticello Economic Development Authority, effective 1/1/2018. 1 have decided to sell my interest in the business and properties located in the City of Monticello, this will make me ineligible to serve as a Commissioner per the Resolution NO. 2013-010 Amended and Restated Resolution Enabling the Creation of the City of Monticello Economic Development Authority Section 2.5 All of the commissioners who are not members of the City Council must be either residents of the City, business -owners in the City, or property -owners in the City. I know that the resolution can be changed, but when we drafted this section myself and others felt strongly that the commissioners need to have a stake and pay taxes in Monticello since they are the stewards of the taxpayer's money for economic development activities. It has been a pleasure being a part of the Monticello Economic Development Authority and working with so many talented people. I am proud of all we have accomplished over the past 21 years, and I have no doubt the EDA will continue these successes in the future. If I can be of any assistance during the time it will take to fill the position, please don't hesitate to ask. Best Regards, Bill Demeu es' C TY OF Applicationfob" Boards & Commissions Address Home Phone Cell Phone E -Mail Must W-5Y7ffe-7n,1rr-y-5%Mr5nV1cen5 to'serve on Me following boards. Please check the box of the board(s) on which you are interested in serving. El Industrial and Economic Development Committee (Does not require residency) 0 City Planning Commission El Library * Parks and Recreation Commission * Economic Development Authority (May not require residency) it Transportation Advisory Committee Education Highest Level of Education Bachelor of Science Degree, SCSU, and Economic Development Finance Professional Emlei ovimant Current Employer, if applicable Retired Position/Title Dates of Employment (starting/ending) Former Employer, if applicable City of Monticello Position/Title Economic Development Director Dates of Empicyrrient (startinglending) October 1985 - May 2008 Please describe in detaii why you are interested in volunteering for the City of Monticello, Basically, i just love the City of Monticello and would love to share or have a voice in its continued growth and improvements. It believe mv past experience can be an asset while recconizinq economic prowarns and times he LhaDjpd. Having IBBn-a-wident of ft Please describe your prior volunteer experiences (include organization names and dates of service) Monticello Hospital Auxillary Past President and current member, Trinity Lutheran Church Women Past Treasurer and current member. Past President of the Wriqht County Economic Development Partnership, Past President and LULWt member of the er of the of the Monticello Chamber of Commerce. List your qualifications for this appointment - Economic Development Finance Professional. Working knowledge of Tax Increment Financing and the EDA Loan Program. Familiar with the Mcnfioe6lo Downtown Revitalization Program as attended several meetics pis. Previously yworked. with i. t,and Homskig-P-=,mms— UnderstandiDg-pi-- EM3= Please list three non -family members who can provide references on your ability to perform this volunteer positon- NarneEllen Bjorn6ie Phone Number Name Don To nn, UMC Phone Number NanneDoug Harmon, TCD C Phone Number Pleaze read the following, carefully before signing, this application'. b 4' � ... City Council Agenda: 01/22/18 2E. Consideration of approving a Special Event Permit for the March Madness 5K beinL- held on March 24, 2018, sponsored by Monticello High School Track/CC Booster Club (JS) The City Council is asked to consider approving the Special Event Permit for the March Madness 5k, including waiving of the $50 permit fee and the use of West Bridge Park and flashing lights from Public Works. A narrative has been provided by the applicant. In previous years the event took place at the Community Center with the Community Center acting as a sponsor. The organizers have been in contact with Public Works and are using cones provided by the department. The Sheriff's Office has been notified of the event. In addition, the applicant has provided a certificate of insurance for the event with the City named as additional insured. Al. Budget Impact: The permit application waiver of fee impact is $50.00. A2. Staff Workload Impact: Minimal. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve waiving the fee for the Special Event Permit. 2. Motion to deny waiving the fee for the Special Event Permit. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff supports Alternative #1 above. It has been the Council's practice to waive this fee for non -profits or for charity events. A. Application & Narrative B. Certificate of Liability Insurance Nionti, cello Property Address Property ID Number Owner Name Owner Phone Owner Email CITY OF MONTICELLO C Community Development 505 Walnut Street, Suite I Monticello, MN 55362 (763) 295-2711 - infoO.ci.nionticello.mmus. Applicant Name Applicant Address I Applicant Phone Applicant Email Name of Event Location/Address of Event Dates & Times of Event PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION I APPLICANT INFORMATION or.4 V6 Special Event Permit Application Checklist S -K 41We 11p e, < Complete Application Required The review and consideration of an application submitted shall only occur if such application includes all items that are required in support of the application and is deemed complete by the City Clerk's Office. Application Submission Schedule Application, required information, and payment must be submitted no later than 30 working days prior to desired approval date. Application Information Applicants shall note that in addition to a special event permits, any liquor license or permit, sign permits and building permits for tents may also be required and are not included within the special event permit application and approval. Any requested use of City facilities, City staff resources, City equipment, and/or City property (including rights of way) and/or any requested waiver of application fee or park rental fees requires review and approval by the City Council. In addition, events which occur after 10 PM may requires review and approval by the City Council as related to noise ordinances. Please provide clear information in the application regarding these requests. 07/25/16 APPLICANT APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS CHECK A written narrative including: 1. A description of the proposed special event, how it will funcaltior on the property, hours and dates of operation, and any other information necessary to fully describe the request; and 2. An explanation of how the proposed special event will meet each of the review criteria specified by code (on reverse), as we as any additional criteria that may apply for the specific use. 3. Any requested use of City facilities, City staff resources, City equipment and City property (including rights of way) and/or ar requested waiver of application fee or park rental fees requires review and approval by the City Council A site plan showing all information necessary to accurately depict hoN the proposed use will function on the site. Information required on tf site plan shall include but not be limited to: 1. The location of all existing and proposed structures; 2. Driveways and parking areas; 3. Proposed storage spaces; 4. Natural features such as woodlands, wetlands, shorelines, etc; 5. Proposed number of parking spaces (if applicable). if deemed necessary by the Community Development Department, a survey may be required to be submitted with the application in addition to a site plan. Certificate of insurance/liability coverage. V" Electronic copies of all written narratives and plan sets required above. r6"11S + +_0 Application fee of $50.00. WA I V6 * The City Clerk will review all Temporary Use Permit applications. * Applications determined to conform with the approval criteria outlined in Monticello Zoning Code Section 2.4(L)(4)(a) and listed below shall be approved by the Community Development Department with any conditions deemed necessary. A copy of the approved permit shall be provided to the applicant which includes all conditions and comments. * Applications not conforming with the approval criteria outlined in Section 2.4(L)(4)(a) shall be denied by the Community Development Department. * A notice of denial shall be provided to the applicant which includes all identified reasons for denial. AAgrri#640F -.us, • .-- '44T&4- - pzftbit�� • Not be detrimental to property or improvements in the surrounding area or to the public health, safety, or general welfare; • Be compatible with the principal uses taking place on the site; • Not have substantial adverse effects or noise impacts on nearby residential neighborhoods; Property Owner's Statement I am the fee title owner of the described property and I agree to this -application. I certify that I am . in compliance with all ordinance requirements and conditions regarding other City approval that have been previously granted. (Signature) (Date) Applicant's Statement This application shall be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contactregarding the application. I have completed all of the applicable filing requirements and I hereby acknowledge that I have read and fully understand the applicable provisions of the City Ordinances and current policies related to this application and that the documents and information I have submitted are true and correct. (Signature) 2 12 Z, (Date) CITY APPROVAL (City Clerk Signature) I (Date) (Community Development Director Signature) (Date) Special Event Permit Approved 1771 'Denied F1 Public Works 77outing Law Enforcement Notcation Building Department Post -Approval Routing/Requirements Applicant Public Works Law Enforcement Notification City Clerk Monticello Community Center Room/Park Reservations Liability Insurance Certificate Received IAdmin I Parks I Streets I Director 07/25/16 4 We are going to make a change to the same approved event we conducted last year, to an early evening run and make it a "glow" run. Participants will be asked to wear bright colored apparel along with any lighted and glowing items. Some of these glowing items will also be provided to each participant. 7:30 PM is sunset on March 24th so see will still be running with partial light as well. We will be on site from approx. 6-9 PM for set-up and tear dowi. We will also be moving the event to West Bridge Park (Community Center in previous years) to use the River Fest 5K route (River Street out and back) which will have less traffic and is well lit. I will be contacting the Monticello Fire Dept. and Wright Co. Sheriff Dept. for other safety assistance as well. Course will be well marked for both the participants but also for the general public and traffic to recognize. I will be in contact with the Monticello Street Dept. for the use of some construction flashing lights to use ?Iong the course and/or at intersections. We will use the West Bridge Park shelter house for our registration and post race area. We will provide water and a snack item for each participant. No other food items will be provided/sold. No large tents or other structures will be used. I would ask the $50 application fee be waived as this is a fandraiser for the Monticello HS Track and Field team as well as the 1 st race of the Monticello Race Series. Thank you for your consideration, 0 DATE (MMIDDIYYYY) AC<ORV CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE 1112712017 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT.. if t6i"cerfificate holder I I s an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(les) must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). RODUCER ]CONA. TACT I Debbie Bledsoe P NME: F -0400 FAX PHONE _,U. I (A,,,N.,: (855)927-6655 North Risk Partners -Apollo Division fAIC, No _Er � (763)314 P"O C -611 Walnut Street ES. debbieb@apolloinsurance.com [EXERESS: Suite I INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC # Monticello MN 55362 INSURER A: Continental Western Group 10804 INSURED INSURERB Dakota Truck Underwriters Monticello Public Schools INSURER C 302 Washington Street INSURER D INSURER E Monticello MN 55362 INSURER F COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: CL177656336 REVISION NUMBER: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED I BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACTOR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAYBE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. �INSR JAVOLbubk POLICY EFF Pouff Exp LTR TYPE Of INSURANCE mism G_' POLICY NUMBER (MWD DATM (MWDDNYYY) LIMITS X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE IS 1,000,000 UAMAGt-_ 10 RhN I IMIJ 300,000 CLAIMS -MADE 19 OCCUR PREMISES (Ea occurrencel $ 1 S 15,000 DED J X1 RETENTION S 0 PER OTH- s -WOi6(ERS COMPENSATION STATUTE ER AND EMPLOYERS! LIABILITY YIN 500,000 ANY PROPFUETORIPAPTNERIEXECUTIVE D NIA WC01000073792017A 07/0112017 07101/2018 E.L. EACH ACCIDENT S 500,000 OFFICERIMEMBER EXCLUDED? F (Mandatory in NN) E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE $ If Yes, describe under E.L, DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT S 500,000 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below . I i DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS I LOCATIONS I VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Romaft Schedule, may bo atiaehad IP mare space Is required) _CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BEC CELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN City of Monticello ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. 505 Walnut St AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE Monticello MN 55362 0 1988-2015 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. ACORD 26 (206103) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD MED EXP (Arwone person) 1.000,000 A SCP298607025 0710112017 07101/2018 PERSONAL & ADV INJURY Is GENLAGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: GENERAL AGGREGATE s 2,000,000 I 1 2.000,000 7X POLICY 0 JPE'GT* ❑F__1 LOC PRODUCTS - COMPIOPAGG $ 7 Employee Benefits Is 1,000,000 OTHER: COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT s 1,000,000 AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY (Ea sWident X ANYAUTO BODILY INJURY (Per person) S A — OWNED SCHEDULED SCP298607025 07/01/2017 07/01/2018 BODILY INJURY (Peraccident) S — AUTOS ONLY HIRED AUTOS NON -OWNED PROPERTY DAMAGE $ AUTOS ONLY AUTOS ONLY (Per accidentl Personal Injury s Statutory X UMBRELLA LIAR OCCUR E.RCM OGCURRENC $ 2,000,000 'A — EXCESS LIAR HC MS-MADEF I SCP298607025 07101/2017 07101/2018 1 AGGREGATE $ 2,000.000 DED J X1 RETENTION S 0 PER OTH- s -WOi6(ERS COMPENSATION STATUTE ER AND EMPLOYERS! LIABILITY YIN 500,000 ANY PROPFUETORIPAPTNERIEXECUTIVE D NIA WC01000073792017A 07/0112017 07101/2018 E.L. EACH ACCIDENT S 500,000 OFFICERIMEMBER EXCLUDED? F (Mandatory in NN) E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE $ If Yes, describe under E.L, DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT S 500,000 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below . I i DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS I LOCATIONS I VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Romaft Schedule, may bo atiaehad IP mare space Is required) _CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BEC CELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN City of Monticello ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. 505 Walnut St AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE Monticello MN 55362 0 1988-2015 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. ACORD 26 (206103) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD City Council Agenda: 01/22/2018 2F. Consideration of avorovint! the 2018 Wright Countv Annual Hi2hwav Maintenance AL-reement. (TM) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The annual maintenance agreement with Wright County for snow and ice control and first time spring sweeping is up for renewal. Areas for this maintenance agreement are unchanged from last year precluding compensation. This snow and ice control agreement covers expenses at 100% for portions of CSAR 75 running from Willow Street east to the intersection of CSAH 18, and a short section of CR 117, approximately two-tenths of a mile long running north from 85th Avenue. Snow and ice control on a portion of CSAH 39 west from the City Public Works Facility to the junction of CSAH 75 (Broadway) is estimated at 25% of the maintenance and the sweeping is a one-time fee for spring sweeping. The agreement rates are based on average annual costs for the years 2014 to 2016, plus $500/mile for four -lane portions. There is a $2,833.73 decrease from last year's contract as the averages over the three-year period for snow removal have decreased due to less severe winters. Al. Budget Impact: The total payment from Wright County for the Annual Highway Maintenance Agreement amounts to $26,944.73 for 2018. This payment is made to the City in December of the contracted year. Additional expenses are budgeted in the Snow and Ice Fund. A2. Staff Workload Impact: As there are no changes to the contract, there is little impact on staff workload. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the 2018 Maintenance Agreement with Wright County with total compensation payable to the City in December 2018, in the amount of $26,944.73. 2. Motion to deny the new agreement with Wright County for annual maintenance of snow and ice removal and sweeping. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends the City Council approve the 2018 Maintenance Agreement with Wright County as outlined in Alternative #1. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of the Wright County Highway Maintenance Agreement. MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT - 2018 THIS AGREEMENTmade and entered into by and between the City of Monticello hereinafter referred to as the "City" and the County of Wright hereinafter referred to as the "County". WHEREAS, Chapter 162, Minnesota Statutes, permits the County to designate certain roads and streets within the City as County State Aid Highways, and WHEREAS, the City has concurred in the designation of the County State Aid Highway within its limits as identified in County Board's resolutions of August 28, October 8, November 5, December 3, December 27, 1957 and January 7, 1958, and WHEREAS, it is deemed to the best interest of all parties that the duties and responsibilities of both the City and the County as to maintenance on said County State Aid Highways to be clearly defined, NOW THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED with regard to said County State Aid Highway maintenance: 4:1 That the City will be responsible for routine Maintenance on the following highways, aimm PLAN ROAD SEGMENT MILES COST/MI,* TOTAL COST* E. ALL (See CSAFI 75, 39, CR 117) 5.75 Lump Sum $2,369.91 C. CSAII 75 Willow St. to CSA -H 39 5.25 4,483.63 23,539.06 (Includes four lane portion plus turnlanes.) D. CSAFI 39 Prom City Public Works Bldg. to 032 995.91 318.70 W. Jet, of CSAH 75 C. CR 117 Froui a point 930 feet north of 85"1 NE 0.18 3,983.63 717.06 To 85"' Street NE ESTIMATED TOTAL = 5.75 $26,944.73 That routine mairttenance shall consist of the following: (Maint. Plan) C� Snow and ice control. D. 25% snow and ice control, E. Sweeping *Based on average annual costs of years 2014, 2015, and 2016 plus $500/mile for four -lane portion (snow/ice control only). That when the City deems it desirable to remove snow by hauling, it shall (to so as its own expense, The City shall also be responsible for all snow and ice removal on sidewalks and other boulevard related maintenance outside the curb or street area. That the County will be responsible for all other maintenance. That the City shall indemnify, save and hold harmless the County and all of its agents and employees of any form against any and all claims, demands, actions or causes of action of whatever nature or character arising out of or by reason of the execution or perfornumce of the work provided for herein to be performed by the City. It is further agreed that any and all full-time employees of the City and all other employees of the City engaged in the performance of any work or services required or provided for herein to be perfonned by the City shall be considered employees of the City only and not or the County; and that any and all claims that may or might arise under Workmen's Compensation Act of the State of Minnesota on behalf of said employees while so engaged and any and all claims made by any third parties as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of said City employees while so engaged on any of the work or services provided to be rendered herein shall be the sole obligation and responsibility of the City. Z, (Sheet 1 of 2) That UIC County Shall indemnify, save and hold harmless the City and all of its agents and employees ofany tbnu against any and all claims, demands, actions Or Causes of actions of whatever nature or character, whether at law or equity, arising out of or by reason of the execution, omission or performance of the work provided for herein to be performed by the County including, but not Innited to, claim-, made arising out of maintenance obligations of County, engineering, design, taking or inverse condemnation proceedings. It is further agreed that any and all full-time employees of the County and all other employees of the County engaged in the performance of any work or services required or provided for herein to be perf'ormed by the County shall be considered employees of the County only and not of the City; and that any and all claims that inay or might arise under the Workmen's Compensation Act of the State of Minnesota on behalf of said employees while so engaged and any and all claims made by any third parties as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of said County employeesLwhile so ed on any of the work or services provided to be rendered herein shall be The sole engaged obligation and responsibility of the County. That in December of _2019 ', the City shall receive payment from the County for their work. This amount shall be based on the average annual cost per mile for the years 2014, 2015, and 2016 for routine maintenance on Municipal County State Aid Highways, The average annual cost per mile will reflect only those costs associated with the areas of routine maintenance for which the. City is responsible. ADOPTED BYthe Monticello City Council this ___ day of , 20_ City Clerk Mayor CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the above is a true and correct copy of as resolution duly passed, adopted and approved by the, City Council of said City on I ?()__. City Clerk APPROVED AND ACCEPTED: COUNT-a'OF WRIGHT Name of City Chainnan of the Board Date County Coordinator Date (Sheet 2 of 2) City Council Agenda: 1/22/18 2G. Consideration of avorovint! Biosolids Farm Lease Agreement with Mark Holker (WO) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The proposed one-year lease is for 122.6 acres at $215 per acre for a total of $26,359. This lease does not contain the 27.4 acres identified for Bertram development. Those 27.4 acres will be under a separate land maintenance agreement because the city cannot profit from its use under deed restrictions. Except for dates, the lease terms are identical to the prior one-year lease. Under lease terms the city can sell the property during crop production with the lessee retaining farming use of the property until harvest. Al. Budget Impact: The new lease will earn $26,359. A2. Staff Workload Impact: Staff impact negligible A3. Legal Review: New lease was reviewed by legal counsel B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve lease agreement with Mark Holker. 2. Motion to not approve lease agreement with Mark Holker. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative 1. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • Lease FARM LEASE, CASH RENT The City of Monticello, 505 Walnut Street, Suite #1, Monticello, Minnesota 55362, as Lessor, hereby leases to Mark Holker, 5496 County Road 37 NE, Monticello, Minnesota 55362, as Lessee, the land lying in Wright County, Minnesota, to -wit: 122.6 (150 acre original parcel minus 27.4 acre parcel) acres of cultivated land in the S2 of the NE 1/4 of Section 8 and the N 2 of the SE 1/4 of Section 8, all in Township 121N, Range 25W. This does not include the 4 -acre area containing an old farmhouse and two pole buildings, nor does it include the 2 -acre single family residence; to have and to hold said premises with the improvements thereon, unto Lessee, his heirs and assigns, subject to the conditions and limitations hereinafter mentioned, for the term of one (1) year with beginning on the 1 st day of January, 2018, and ending on the 31st day of December, 2018, for the base rate of $215 per acre totaling $26,359.00 (twenty-six thousand two hundred fifty dollars) per year, payable as follows, to wit: The first semi-annual navment of 1/3 of the contract sum due on or before April 15th of each year; The second semi-annual navment of 2/3, of the contract sum due on or before Nov t st of each yea—r_ and, in consideration thereof, said Lessee covenants with the said Lessor, his heirs and assigns, as follows: 1. RENT: That he will pay rent for said land as above specified; 2. OPERATION: That he will farm said land according to the best farming practices in its locality and provide all tolls, implements, machinery and hired help necessary to that end; SEED HARVESTING: That he will use on said land only the best seed available and will promptly pay all harvesting bills during said term; 4. WEEDS: That he will keep all land and adjoining fence lines and highways free from weeds, and destroy same before seeds ripen by spraying or otherwise, and will use herbicides to eradicate weeds on tillable land; PLOWING: That as soon as possible after removal of crops each year he will plow all parts of said land for crops of the ensuing year; 6. REPAIRS: That he will perform all work of making repairs of the improvements on said land as soon as said Lessor furnishes materials; 7. IMPROVEMENTS: That he will accept all fences, the irrigation, well and 10 -tower irrigation system, and other improvements on the premises as they now are, or any additions thereto, and to carefully care for and protect the same from fire, wind and all other hazards, and to keep the same clean and in repair, without demand upon or expense to the Lessor, the usual wear, inevitable accidents, and loss by fire, lighting, heavy wind, or tornado excepted, and Lessor shall not be liable for failure of the water supply, nor shall the rental be abated therefore; 8. Lessee agrees to allow the City or its authorized representatives full access to the farmland, and to use the biosolids from the City's Wastewater Treatment Plant as a crop fertilizer (wholly or as a supplement) where directed by the City, and to follow the recommendations of a crop and land consultant hired by the City. 7J_Le1mKilmm 9. Excluding City needs, the Lessor agrees that this agreement includes exclusive use of irrigation well, electric driven well pump, booster pump pipes, and 7 -tower electric Valley Center Pivot Irrigator. Irrigation needs of the Lessee have priority. Irrigation system and piping may be changed to eliminate irrigation overspray currently occurring on adjacent land not included within this lease agreement, or to reduce or eliminate irrigation on lands reduced by Lessor as per Section 13 herein. 10. Maintenance and incidental repair work to be responsibility of the Lessee. 11. Major repairs, items exceeding $500, caused by long term wear to be responsibility of the Lessor minus the first $500 from the Lessee. Major repairs require City consent. 12. Lessor agrees to maintain complete insurance coverage on the irrigation equipment; Lessor is to keep the irrigation permit up to date. 13. Lessor may reduce the number of leased acres. Lessor will pay for changes to irrigation system resulting from such action. The total rent will be reduced by the per acre amount for the acres removed from the lease. Lessor may sell leased acres with lessee retaining rights to access, irrigation equipment and crop until harvested. 14. Lessee is responsible for all power bills due from running the irrigator and pump. If the irrigation system waters land which the City pulled from use by Lessee, the power bill shall be prorated to the City and Lessee, based upon the percent of water used by the City. Lessee shall provide power usage data to Lessor on demand. 15. Lessee agrees to allow north/south portions of the land to be used by the City for alternate crops, such as alfalfa or hay. Lessor agrees to credit the Lessee at the applicable lease rate per acre for any farmland the Lessor removes from use, due to the need to grow a crop the Lessee does not normally produce. The City will then make a separate agreement with Lessee or others to plant the area used for an alternate crop. 16. Lessor agrees to credit the Lessee for crop damage or reduced yields directly caused by the City, such as delays due to biosolids application, or direct damage from the City's equipment. The value shall be based upon yields and sales of crops on the remaining portion of the fann. Should the water supply fail, the Lessor shall order the necessary repairs to the well, pump, motor and main power supply without unreasonable delay. 17. ASSIGNMENT AND SUBLETTING: That Lessee will neither assign this lease nor sublet any part of said land without consent of said Lessor; Lessor may assign agreement and/or sale land without consent from Lessee. 18. OPTION TO RENEW LEASE: The Lessee shall have the first option to extend or renew this lease, dependent upon successful negotiation of terms by both the Lessee and Lessor; option to renew is only valid if City retains ownership of land; 19. SECURITY AGREEMENT: That, to secure performance of the terms and conditions herein, Lessee hereby grants to Lessor, his heirs and assigns, a security interest in all crops of every kind which have been planted or are growing, or which may hereafter be planted or growing on the above-described land. Z=Telzrailmm THIS SECURITY AGREEMENT IS SUBJECT TO THE TERMS PRINTED ON THE REVERSE SIDE HEREOF, WHICH ARE MADE A PART HEREOF. LESSEE'S RECEIPT FOR COPY The undersigned Lessee hereby acknowledges the receipt from the Lessor of a true, correct and complete copy of the forgoing Security Agreement and Lease. WITNESS Our hands this day of 2018. Mark Holker - Lessee Jeff -O 'Neill City of'Monticello - Lessor The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2018, by Jeff O'Neill, Citv of Monticello and Mark Holker. (Names of Persons Acknowledged) Acknowledged By: My Commission Expires: ZJ_LNUc;91MM W U2 LESSEE HEREBY AGREES THAT: A. UNTIL DEFAULT, Lessee may retain possession of the Collateral and harvest, process, store and use it in any lawful manner not inconsistent with the agreements herein. B. DEFAULT, Lessee shall be in default under this Agreement upon the happening of any of the following events: (a) non payment, when due, of any amount payable on any of the liabilities or failure to observe or perforin any term hereof, (b) any Lessee becomes insolvent or unable to pay debts as they mature or makes an assignment for the benefit of the creditors, or any proceeding is instituted by or against any lessee alleging that such lessee is insolvent or unable to pay debts as they mature; (c) the entry of any judgment against any lessee; (d) death of any lessee who is a natural person or of any partner of any lessee which is a partnership; (e) dissolution, merger or consolidation, or transfer of a substantial part of the property of any lessee which is a corporation or a partnership; (f) loss, theft, substantial damage, destruction or encumbrance of any of the collateral; or (g) if the lessor deems himself insecure for any reason. C. REMEDIES. In the event of a default, Lessor shall have the right, at his option and without demand or notice, to declare all or any part of the obligations immediately due and payable; and in addition, Lessor may exercise, in addition to the rights and remedies granted hereby, all of the rights and remedies of a secured party under the Uniform Commercial Code or any other applicable law. Lessee agrees in the event of a default to make the collateral available to Lessor at a place to be designated by Lessor which is reasonably convenient. Lessee further agrees to pay all costs and expenses of Lessor, including reasonable attorney's fees, in the collection of any of the obligations or the enforcement of any of Lessor's rights. If any notice of sale, disposition or other intended action by Lessor is required by law to be given to Lessee, such notice shall be deemed reasonably and properly given if mailed to Lessee at the home address of Lessee, or at such other address of Lessee as may be shown on Lessor's records, at least ten (10) days before such sale, disposition or other intended action. Waiver of any default hereunder by Lessor shall not be waiver of any other default or of a same default on a later occasion. No delay or failure by Lessor to exercise any right or remedy shall be a waiver of such right or remedy and no single or partial exercise by Lessor of any right or remedy shall preclude other or further exercise thereof or the exercise of any other right or remedy at any other time. D. TERMINATION. This Agreement and the security interest in the collateral created hereby shall tenninate when the obligations have been paid in full. No waiver by Lessor of any default shall be effective unless in writing nor operate as a waiver of any other default or of the same default on a future occasion. E. ATTORNEY-IN-FACT. Lessor is hereby appointed Lessee's attorney-in-fact to do all things and acts necessary to perfect and to continue to perfect the security interest and the collateral. F. ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS. (if none, insert "none".) NONE G. The Security Agreement contains the entire agreement between the parties, and no oral agreement shall be binding. 41 J y i 41 U •t Q.! M1 � 41 City Council Agenda: 01/22/2018 2H. Consideration of approving a request for Conditional Use Permit for an approximately 780 square foot residential detached Accessory Use Structure — Maior in an R-1 (Single-Familv Residence) District. Applicant: James and Erica Witzmann (AS, JaT) Property: PID 155-114-001060 Address: 9763 River Forest Dr. Planning Case Number: 2018-003 Request(s): Conditional Use Permit for a detached Accessory Use Structure — Major in an R -I District Deadline for Decision: January 191h 2018 Land Use Designation: Places to Live Zoning Designation: R -I (Single Family Residential) The purpose of the "R-1" single family district is to provide for low density, single family, detached residential dwelling units and directly related complementary uses. Overlays/Environmental Regulations Applicable: Current Site Use: Surrounding Land Uses: Project Description: Residential R-1 (Single Family Residential) The applicant is seeking to construct a second garage on the property at 9763 River Forest Drive. The new garage would be detached, and a total of approximately 780 square feet in area. The existing house footprint is a total of 936 square feet with an attached garage of 684 square feet. ANALYSIS Conditional Use Permit. Specific Zoning Requirements. The zoning ordinance lists the following specific standards for these uses (with staff comments included): City Council Agenda: 01/22/2018 (2) Accessory Building — Major (a) In all residential districts except M -H, the following shall apply: (i) Size 1. Except by Conditional Use Permit issued pursuant to Section 5.3(D)(3)(a)(i)(2) below, no detached accessory building shall exceed ten percent (10%) of the rear yard of the parcel on which it is located, nor shall any combination of attached garage and detached accessory building exceed the following maximum area, whichever is less: a. 1,200 square feet; or b. The gross square footage of the principal building footprint. The applicant has proposed an approximately 780 square foot detached accessory building which is well less than 10 percent of the rear yard (approximately 26,000 square feet). The existing attached garage (684 square feet) and the proposed structure (780 square feet) would be a total of 1,464 square feet. The principal building footprint is 936 square feet requiring a Conditional Use Permit for the accessory use structure — major. A detached structure would be permitted use if below 252 square feet. 2. The size limitations for accessory building area listed in Section 5.3(D)(3)(a)(i)(1) above may be increased, up to a maximum square footage of 1,500 square feet, by the issuance of a Conditional Use pen -nit when the following conditions are found to exist: (a) Accessory building space is to be utilized solely for the storage of residential personal property of the occupant of the principal dwelling, and no accessory building space is to be utilized for commercial purposes. The applicant has indicated that the garage would be used for storage of boat and lawn equipment. (b) The parcel on which the accessory building is to be located is of sufficient size such that the building will not crowd the open space on the lot. An aerial image estimation of the rear yard is approximately 26,000 square feet. The proposed project would consume less than 10 percent of the rear yard, open space. (c) The accessory building will not be so large as to have an adverse effect on the architectural character or reasonable residential use of the surrounding property. The applicant has proposed a structure that is less than 10 percent of the rear yard. The combined total of attached and detached accessory structures on the property is approximately 1,464 square feet, under the 1,500 allowable by CUP. The structure will be located behind the rear building line of the principal structure. (d) The accessory buildings shall be constructed to be similar to the principal building in architectural style and building materials. The applicant has proposed to roof and side the structure the same as the house. (ii) Private Garages 1. Private garages shall be used by the family or families residing upon the premises, except as follows: City Council Agenda: 01/22/2018 (a) One-half of the private garage spaces on the premises can be rented to non- residents of the property for private passenger vehicles and/or non- commercial vehicles, trailers, or equipment if sufficient off-street parking in full compliance with this ordinance is provided elsewhere on the property. (b) All of the private garage spaces on the premises can be rented to non-residents of the property for private passenger vehicles and/or non-commercial vehicles, trailers, or equipment if the available garage space does not exceed two spaces. 2. No business, service, or industry shall be carried on within a private garage; 3. Private garages shall not be used for the storage of more than one (1) commercial vehicle owned or operated by a resident per dwelling unit. The applicant has indicated in their narrative that the space would be used for storage of boat and lawn equipment. The proposed detached structure is shown to be setback 6 feet from the interior side yard property line and approximately 56 feet from the rear yard property line. Per the Monticello Zoning Ordinance, the setbacks for accessory structure on the interior side are 6 feet and 6 feet for rear yard setback. The proposed structure meets the setback requirements, although at minimum for side yard. The applicant will be required to verify setbacks by locating and staking property corners or a new certificate of survey for the proposed structure. It is further noted that there is a slope in the rear yard and as such, the Building Official has included a condition that the structure may need to be located forward of the proposed location to avoid any issues related to the slope. The application is subject to the comments of the City Engineer regarding grading and drainage. Planning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission reviewed this item on January 2"d, 2018 and held a public hearing on the request. Mr. James and Ms. Erica Witzmann, applicants, made themselves available for questions. During the hearing, Dick Van Allen, 6448 River Mill Drive, asked what provisions would be made for downhill rainwater and for erosion of the soil. Chainnan Brad Fyle stated that the City Engineer would be looking into this. Van Allen also inquired about parking of vehicles and equipment outside of the facility. Lastly, Van Allen asked for the height of the proposed structure. Staff explained that the City requires a six-foot drainage and utility easement on either side of the property line or twelve feet in total and it requires a swale for drainage purposes. In addition, there is a thirty-foot drainage and utility easement in the rear of the property that should manage the drainage. Staff also stated the Engineering and Building Department would review during building permit review for any issues. It was also noted that the City's ordinance for parking is strict on location and surface requirements and the applicant will need to comply with base code requirements in 3 City Council Agenda: 01/22/2018 that regard. The conditions also required that the structure could not be taller than fifteen feet at the middle of the gable end. Chair Fyle sought confirmation from the applicant that any access to the structure would be on the applicant's property and the applicant confirmed. The Commission also confirmed the location of the proposed structure would be located within the existing fenceline, about 1-15 forward of the rear fenceline. After the hearing, the Commission recommended unanimously to approve the conditional use permit, subject to the conditions in Exhibit Z. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: The Planning Commission recommends Alternative #1 below. 1. Motion to approve the Conditional Use Permit for a proposed approximately 780 square foot structure, subject to the conditions in Exhibit Z, and based on findings in Resolution No. PC 2018-001. 2. Motion to deny approval of the Conditional Use Permit based on findings to be stated by the City Council. 3. Motion to table action subject to submission of additional information. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the CUP, based on findings that the building will meet both the intent and the specific standards of the Zoning Ordinance. The applicant is under the threshold for structures being less than 10 percent of the rear yard, which was designed to not overwhelm the open feel of the lot or the neighborhood. With the conditions as noted in Exhibit Z, planning staff believes that the proposed building is appropriate for the site. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Resolution PC -2018-001 B. Aerial Image, Subject Site C. Applicant Narrative D. Site Plans with Elevations E. Survey F. Aerial Image with Rear Yard Dimensions Z. Conditions of Approval M City Council Agenda: 01/22/2018 EXHIBIT Z James and Erica Witzmann Conditional Use Permit for Accessory Building — Major 9763 River Forest Drive 1. Accessory building space is to be utilized solely for the storage of residential personal property of the occupant of the principal dwelling, and no accessory building space is to be utilized for commercial purposes. 2. The accessory building shall be constructed to be similar to the principal building in architectural style and building materials. 3. The accessory building shall not exceed 15' in height as required by ordinance. 4. Access to the structure will remain on the property. 5. Final location of the proposed structure is subject to the Building Official's recommendation as related to the rear yard slope. 6. Survey staking of property lines and setbacks will be required at building permit to verify 6' side yard setback requirement; a new certificate of survey including the proposed improvements may be required to verify property lines and setback. 7. Grading and drainage is subject to the comment of the City Engineer. 8. Compliance with the comments of other staff and Planning Commission. 0 WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted a request to construct a detached accessory use — major structure in the rear portion of the subject property for storage of boat and lawn equipment; and WHEREAS, the site is zoned Single -Family Residence (R-1), which allows such use by Conditional Use Permit; and WHEREAS, the proposed use and development are consistent with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan designation of "'Places to Live" for the area; and WHEREAS, the applicants have provided materials documenting compliance with the terms of the applicable zoning regulations; and WflEREAS, the uses are consistent with the intent and purpose of the R-1 zoning district; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on January 2"", 2018 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: I The proposed use is consistent with the intent and purpose of the R-1, Single Family Residence Zoning District. 2. The parcel on which the accessory building is to be located is of sufficient size such that the building will not crowd the open space on the lot; and 3. The accessory building will not be so large as to have an adverse effect on the architectural character or reasonable residential use of the surrounding property. 4. The accessory use structure -.major meets the intent and requirements of the applicable zoning regulations, pursuant to the conditions attached to the Conditional Use Per nit. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, that the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the Monticello City Council approves the Conditional Use Pell -nit for an Accessory Use Structure - Major, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit Z as follows: 1. Accessory building space is to be utilized solely for the storage of residential personal property of the occupant of the principal dwelling, and no accessory building space is to be utilized for commercial purposes. 2. The accessory building shall be constructed to be similar to the principal building in architectural style and building materials. 3. The accessory building shall not exceed 15' in height as required by ordinance. 4. Survey staking of property lines and setbacks will be required at building pen -nit to verify 6' sideyard setback requirement-. a new certificate of survey including the proposed improvements may be required to verify property lines and setback. 5. Grading and drainage is subject to the comment of the City Engineer. 6. Access to the structure will remain on the property. 7. Compliance with the comments of other staff and Planning Commission. ADOPTED this 2"" day of January, 2018 by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION V By: B 'ac Fyle, C air ATTEST: J,' ?W JV L4 Angela Sehumailnt Cod unity Development Director N Witzmann, James & Erica - Request for Conditional Use Permit Created by: City of Monticello Lot 6, Block 1, River Forest I PID: 155-114-001060 CIA L) VIA TO Lj UL -'ii C)4 James & Erica Witzman 9763 River Forest Drive Monticello, MN 55385 26' x 30' single story garage 30 yr asphalt shingles w/drip cap Ice/water shield to code # 15 Felt paper Drip cap Roof vents to code Vinyl siding w/house wrap Metal soffit/fascia to match home Steel insulated overhead door No interior finish -No electrical 5/12 Engineered parallel cord trusses 24" on center 15/32 roof sheathing 7/16" OSB wall sheathing 16' 8" Total height from concrete floor to top of truss. Truss height is i'0" n 12" OH on gables 24" OH on eaves Hurricane clips on all trusses to top plates 9. 8» Total wall height 2 x 6 framing 16" on center 2 x 10 SPF headers for with concrete all windows & service block -"to top 7/16" OSB sheathing door. plate" 12" LVL -continuous for front of garage House wrap Vinyl siding -rade 8" block with anchor bolts as required Grade Thickened edge slab -poured as one continuous piece Rebar 10" WX 16"D Rebar I 30' C� 3018 i -' NN (D 0 -a r. ; � W • -a Cit N t) to 0 C/)O � N v= < CII W IV x x n . r _ = e CQ m' (D N N ® 0) 000 n - - - - - -- ---- ,E-� (pr x CD x 0) O < (/) = ao xcr _ CD (D '-' N o o ��(0 o CD oo':D O 0) O n 42, CD os �- a O (n (6- N cg =' Q 0. CD � v � (n CD � � 0) -a CDD 0 ca m oo O 3( 2) Cr N p cD Q ° m vm CD CD °- ch Ch - (a < CD -h m s ocg Q° v CD is p 3 p (m Cr (D CD ® O (D � < V 65 - - -- -- - -- O (D p us - - - - - O O N CD cz ° a CD (a �° ® o (n O O (n i C2CD (OD (D OCD -mCD CD =r 0 i (Q d U) -+* O i O n � % -- -- moon _- I i 3018 3068 30' C� a 0-41-Ropw BUFFALO, 1415 COUNTY ROAD 134, BUFFALO, MN, 763-684-0830 L& Illustration may not depict all options selected. SMEAWALL C ENDIAIALL A (1) - Mastercraft®R Primed Steel 6 -Panel Prehung Exter. (1) - MastercraftCR) Primed Steel 6 -Panel PrehUng Exter— (1) - Ideal DooiOp EZ -SET® 5 -Star 16'x t' White Raise... ed Design Name: Garage Design Design ID: 320355026820 Estimate M: 4375 GARA61' X, NOR= M1 BUFFALO, 1415 COUNTY ROAD 134, BUFFALO, MN, 763-684-0830 Meen �*Illustration may not depict all selections. Endwaff A ----------- Sidewall C Design Name: Garage Design Design if,)- 320355026820 Estimate ID: 4375 Sidewall D 26' Endwall 6 EsUmi ated ToW Mze-. -Jadav'% estixnated.nnce, future Pricing May 90 up oTax, labor and dor w :�6 I. Jelivery no Tn_re included. Price does not reflect Floor type (concrete, dirt, gravel) is NOT included in estimated price. The floor type is used in the calculation of materials needed. Labor, foundation, steel beams, paint. electrical. lieadinq,, plumbing. and delivery are also NOT Included in estimated price. This is an estit note. it is only for geneml price Information. This Is riot an Offer and there can be no lecIally binding contract betvveen ?Ile parties based on this estimate. The prices stated herein are subject to change depending upon the madet conditions. The prices stated on this estirriate are, , not firm for any time period unless specifically written othernise on this form. The availability of materials is subject to inventory conditions. MENARDS IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY LOSS INCURRED BY THE GUEST WHO RELIES ON PRICES SET FORTH HEREIN OR ON THE AVAILABILITY OF ANY MATERIALS STATED HEREIN, All information on this forni, other than price, has been provided by the guest and Menards is riot responsible for any errors in the information or) this estimate, including but not limited to quantity, diniensionand quality. Please examine this estin-ote carefully. MENARDS MAL<ES NO REPRESENTATIONS, ORAL, WRITTEN OR 01 FIERWISE THAT THE MATERIALS LISTED ARE SUITABLE FOR ANY PURPOSE BEING CONSIDERED BY THE GUEST. BECAUSE OF WIDE VARIATIONS IN CODES, THERE ARE NO REPRESENTATIONS THAT THE MATERIALS LISTED HEREIN MEET YOUR CODE REQUIREMENTS, THE PLANS AND/OR DESIGNS PROVIDED ARE Nor ENGINEERED. LOCAL. CODE OR ZONING REGULATIONS MAY REQUIRE SUCH STRUCTURES TO BE PROFESSIONALLY ENGINEERED AND CERTIFIED PRIOR -10 CONST RUG1 LON. Is GARAGE t { k k ' i I 9 James & Erica. Witzman 9763 River Forest Drive Monticello, MN 55385 Parallel cord truss 26' x 30' single story garage 30 yr asphalt shingles w/drip cap Ice/water shield to code #15 Felt paper Drip cap Roof vents to code Vinyl siding w/house wrap Metal soffit/fascia to match home Steel insulated overhead door No interior finish -No electrical 5/12 Engineered parallel cord trusses 24" on center 15/32 roof sheathing 7/16" OSB wall sheathing 12" OH on gables 24" OH on eaves Hurricane clips on all trusses to top plates 2 x 6 framing 16" on center 2 x 10 SPF headers for all windows & service 7/16" OS sheathing door. 12" LVL -continuous for front of garage House wrap Vinyl siding rade 8" block with anchor bolts as required Thickened edge slab -poured as one continuous piece Rebar 10" W X 16" D Rebar A IC 8" Total, height from concrete floor to top of truss. Truss height is 7'0" M W 8" Total wall height with concrete block -"to top plate" Grade AI d t rA9 k✓,W M ,�,,,, r ..,. w , ri 11' �tic wnp 6 w a q) 0 z Q- 04 0 4z 00 z tommo to i 0 to ImL - 00 C- G L) C-4 z At LU Cc �z C4 a C a mz LU ce 00 2.0 to = Q: q) 142 -CJ II 00 Lu Q) 3 C)O 0 P La 0 I-z tij t) Cd r- a 'I- -tz I ct < u 14- 1 -9� 1 601-6 U- (LIU)as 0 �G rL dQ ,a,z LJ CID ...... . Q)Ai MOO WU C: ::3 0 11 Vi- I (i Cy 0) 40 �011N-00 'Cc CC Ca L 0% 0 A, tra V)wz Z Q Olt c - 6 �!s , :,ZU3 � Li C C�= 0 0 Z --Q. -C Lu LUM*c ir 0 V U- C w cl) MammonLIJ 'm V Z) 0� cz b o Q: Loj C, LLJ uj LLJ LLJ > CO m OD N k3 3, 0 v Ci 0 LU coma ca L'i .4 0 E 2, (0 © c) CL Cc ui < LL as to U_) rr f E 0 Q) �z Q, 0 ZS c 0 0 0 0 z P---0 W i� 0 - Q) Lxj M ui C) L 9 q) 0 LE E -6 -53 6 C4 Ul) -C� to 0 - -0 a) .4, q) 0 Of co 00 -0 >, .30, -0 W Q. CL U) EL 0 U) 946 V* R ko 0 asimMISIR %: q, I % #, Il- - 0— T- 82:�z .0 m Ira� 0 rz -0 V) -0 (D 0 2% 0 0) C) m OEM x q) C 01 q) :3 C) q) ca 4-0 0 Q co Ca Or 19 D q) q3 US 0 (0 0 En 0 S; . 1 0 Q 0 q) Cl) 0 rj) Q 0 ZI lu CL QL CIL V) q) (b Q) od` 4)0) q) Q) 4) Q) Q) Q) o 0 Tre gTo 001V ta f I I i I 09Y91 z z z 'r` IZ r- Crz 0 py q) (b Q) 9) 9) Q) q) C) q) Z Q) Q) q) .. m 41 C� Q Q (z Q C.� C) C) C) C� Z3 Q Q Q , a I I I mo LA rc-)l z Wy 0 Q) C6 i.n 11 9 R 9) 04-1 04 0 cn LTJ x 94 feet ,LI�1� pntred irony tvgQ &.41s 1h sink 20 City Council Agenda: 01/22/18 2I Consideration of authorizing preparation of a partnership agreement with the Monticello Lions to develop, fund and operate a splash pad at Pioneer Park. (TP/AS) City Council is asked to authorize developing a partnership agreement with the Monticello Lions for funding the development of a splash pad facility at Pioneer Park. The proposed partnership framework would include shared funding of the splash pad construction, with the development of the splash pad to be coordinated by the City with assistance from the Lions. Operation and maintenance of the splash pad would be an on-going expense for the City Parks Department. In 2016, the Monticello Lions asked City staff to bring forward a request to develop a partnership agreement to construct a community splash pad at Pioneer Park (a Lions adopted park). Representatives from the Lions shared splash pad ideas with the Parks & Recreation Commission. The motion from the Commission was to approve Pioneer Park as the location and to enter into a partnership with the Lions to construct a community splash pad. The Lions has been researching the different types of splash pads for Pioneer Park and has been working with Aquatix, a division of Landscape Structures in Delano, MN on design concepts. The Lions has received a preliminary design and cost for the splash pad installation from Aquatix. Based on the preliminary concept, the Lions identified $300,000 for the total project cost and they are willing to allocate $150,000 towards the cost of the splash pad, which would be raised over an estimated three-year period. The Lions Club is asking to partner with the city for the remaining $150,000 cost. The Lions also propose to use club labor and volunteer time to lower cost. The Lions would like the City to construct the splash pad in the spring of 2019. To continue to move the project planning forward for the Lions fundraising efforts, the club has asked that the City Council commit at this time to the location at Pioneer Park and to a city funding level of $150,000, which would be identified in the 2019 Budget. The Lions have also proposed that the City consider utilizing its membership in the National Joint Power Alliance, a purchasing cooperative, for the project proposal process. The City of Monticello is a member of the NJPA and the City Attorney has indicated that the cooperative could be used for this project proposal process. Staff would seek to verify other details on the use of this program versus a full design and bid process prior to moving forward. Final design details will need to be refined between the City, the Lions Club and the final contractor. The preliminary design presented by the Lions for the proposed splash pad has an internal water recycle reservoir for re -circulation. With this type of system, the City will be required to have staff certified by the State of MN to monitor the outdoor splash pad and to track and test the water twice a day. The Parks Superintendent will develop a City Council Agenda: 01/22/18 rotating staff schedule for checking the water before opening time and at closing time. It is proposed that the splash pad be free and open to the public from Memorial Day thru Labor Day. The splash pad will not be supervised by staff during operation time and no fencing is proposed with the structure. Staff has provided Aquatix estimated operating costs with supporting documentation. Al. Budget Impact: Staff will identify $150,000 towards project as part of the 2019 budget cycle and a monthly operating expense of $4,000 or $18,000/yr with opening and closing for seasons. A2. Staff Workload Impact: Staff workload impact includes preparation of a partnership agreement or memorandum of understanding, working through the design proposal and bid process, assisting the club with design and build, and long-term operation and maintenance of the splash pad. A3. Strategic Plan Impact: Partnership with the Lions for this project would be in support of Strategic Plan Goals as follows: 1. Build a Connected Community: Partnership with a local community organization to achieve a desired community amenity. 2. Strengthen Our Image as a Destination: Prioritize investment in a desired community amenity (per 2010 Parks & Pathways Plan) to enhance resident and visitor experience. 1. Motion to approve Pioneer Park as the location for a community splash pad and to enter into a partnership agreement with the Monticello Lions to develop a splash pad with a shared construction cost not to exceed $300,000 for the total project. 2. Motion to approve Pioneer Park as location of splash pad but not to enter into a partnership agreement with the Monticello Lions. 3. Motion to deny the splash pad development. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff and the Parks & Recreation Commission recommend Alternative #1. Final project proposal or bid information will be presented at a later time for consideration. The Parks & Recreation Commission will continue to be involved in the design process. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Preliminary design B. Pictures of equipment C. Aquatix estimated operating cost O o;a Z Z W 0 ;um i -n c (-) X o Z z > r- ;u < z 11 If ro 0 zo� z qn� < ;a � m m 65'-V c < GS <m<A3CJI AT. ,:C > >-Ocl iALa0 0 c 0 > < 0 A 'E: z 5E 0 < 0 , z > z,- < -, 'n X,c, x c Z mm'� c>m 0 mo, 1 3 'Zo X:K 7 OZ x m 3 cn c: c 0 z Z Z 0 c mm > n C);o > z z 0c) 0 rn C)> 0 C> cT:K ) 3, Ic I z po ,700 rn m , 0--, GIH 73m, > ;a 0 M , C K m zoz CIl0 m PO-zm OD z M M Dm m C C, Z > 6) Z ; A, z G) > Z, i> 9z Z� c o r� z > rL u m nmnz 0, n >> 0 z > 0 M< m > n 0 zm 2 ua 71 0 c) G) M 3x m>> 2x mq 'n, I < Z,? Z M z z m>m mo> I c n CIE: 0 z z "I z I C DC) 0 Z 0 0,m vc > 41 n > z > Z.fc- I :E> D DU 0 :oK P - 0 1 0 Z3 , 3- --Iz C1 cn 0 > 0 'a ZE MO T' 'I ()o u 0 > C) > � z M > > ;E 0, m ol 1 9" V, �j - z �4 OD rn cn 0 r- m > > --i --1 2 n m > m < > 0 nwx�Q,>E-czpzmrmo�=omm>]E>n�0m O-MTZ:j,,�Fm 0 -n -1 rn -0 0 rn---� u, 0 > rn > -n 0 O zCF > T 0 n x < -n co -0 E> 0 r Z W Z :E Z 0 :5 ) r- > > 0:� > 0 n o 0 ;a m w m > --I o u) m x m > m --i o cm 5", 0 6 :E-EEZW?�2XQ,*-jZnZ 30M�EOMZ2ZX-nMpn:�f-4 _ _Z__,_nj r U)M,cm-ow T,� r M X Z mo>QOE--iEnmc)mo;r -i ;o c > - 0 1 Ln . cr2o-c-mzn*5z,z:�T>om>o:�mXow n C, o ---I o 0 < > n c,,m;u>;u-iz.-m - ;OG)--i;02>OzN':F)m7umG)zz-io2n?�>oo>o-,EZOMZ=ZMZM�2 ZOZ >xz ror=mn'c�u-ocnoo�.g�,CIMMG)ZMZON Z ----4 --4Mu)MNMWcnX M --i . M >m XMTo(--,>c z , U -i m 0 > - --i M > m Ln > _ Z IMO __j2oUQ-ljn-0302- Z m _ - m 0 -0 W ;a E, _ , ur-02!OOMOM ;UM> M < 0 M o,o�o,,00.5;06.-0Q)>x M ZZ MMOM>:EMO�ll M G) �6 > Z I r3 > M r' > Z M ;a -n r En m 0 �Q 0 m o-znmzmmmm, �u _ - m --I :K 0 > > >5-'-n � mnooc>,3m- --i (n 5; 0 ;Q ni-nzu) z , C7 0 U) --� m - M-0 Z(WnOzjCDFnum°zr-<-2mzu)>:Kcfolm�MMTX--'z En -.�a:cr-co-o--4>RUMW,>MWOM>C�MXMM n<>Lno-40mmcm>(00>>!>Cnu-o->>-o!� m -n c o>ao3mr-mz r- r- mzwu)>�Ooozz-unmmmz:mm>M-Do 0 >n 0, --jabnz m --ifn rn-nZz m -0 > -n I rn m -ioz-om m>--uTn,m5 M >0 > _0 --4 rn 7 m 0 -0 V, _4 uO<m>mno�0>zwC) > (Q >:�, > z >m 0,- m mz>>u)�n-cu-<ulmw , 0 n z 1 03 > --I m > �0' >mm2z:Ez,FZ-<z oXmx>c>mm5mm m ;0> >Z>l 00, m2u) zm co r- --q ocamon,- m -0 > 'o -0 N () , n --, > -V 2c):Erzo:Kzoz > m- -1 0 iLo>n> c zo--i-DZ<m U) >-ommmmu MX -C)o zr- -<> 0 'mozo - > ;u 0 0 M -0-<TZ -CUnr-OOW M cn c M > z -i z - G) U 5� �) C _ M < __I 2E-TWME,o:E 0 M:E > M - I = mo MITZ, >F) ��O>ozm w Z�oozm 0 M>W,O --4 En>x>0 >oon21708 Ell n > 4u-,�n-z F 0 z m X, -n, -< -, z 2 -< �J< a: 0 �D T -Q < m 0 C) -i m ,mo M > M m -0 M M 1: -n M > OD m 7 0 70 u u) F u) �D 0 0 -, rn x M:K C) �o > m --i > ;u m q - , > > z MN>M--i- , -0 �D 2 0 E0 -n 0 > r- z > z > c > m > m ;u m �u 0 0 M:E 0 (n X r- 0 --4 c C > -< --I > >� 0 < --i m r;u E) Z n . - Z -i b mOO �0�0— > -n > � , --I rn 0 z - M U)nzo Z6>� m 0 rn --I L> I Fn n o 1 3 -j z r Z Z,-� > z -i m > > Z*< 'm __,OOMU :K m a m o :j --I ;u U) T z m oz-mmm C z C) > 5,01,0 > :6 0 F- M4 -u rn z > mmu > z c u' 0 En :K m 0 :K n 0 0 n 2 2 ;a --1 0 z > < L, n E, �o n n >x x 0 nl:E > X 7 0 > m 0 m ;u :K 0 Z>�o i . M>c>:� m mo 0a --q Z > , > , , z --, 0 -1 > -0 El - -n z C);Q > > n m 5 c �' -0 �D --j -u > m>-MOM7 ozm>m a U) 'm Ornz r -LD ZU)m c m m Z 0 --4 > 0 --1 z > nl 0 > rn c > M -0 0 c -0 0 m 0 > M -n M r- F- n z Fz u L , r- �u r- > 0 �a 0 --i G) 0 a --i cn m ozc z > > m n m US m En m m 0 --4 :K mut- --1 0 b X0 Fn -i --I z m - M m -4 m m 0 z m SCALE 0 N 0 SCALE n SHEET TI LL PROPOSED SPLASH PAD SCHEMATIC LAYOUT 0,112211, ,R(LPQLAI -LL PIONEER PARK SPLASH PAD aquafix' MONTICELLO, MN z > > X u, n oomc�p--i--4omn-<7c: r-c>zozm--qx--io�QwO m m Z > -i rm > n o :E > > 0 -< 0 ()<�oxzZzo -� :K-, > > u - ) I > < Q. 0 > m Ell m n T 0 m mm (1) M m m z m X 0 Z -0 co m m i , M 0 m 0 U) 0 x m z 3 > 0 ;o 0 (1) r- :E :E G) m > m m r- U) r- m T m --I G) w > rn > m 6 > > > , rn ul rn 0 m 0 0 -0 z m D m M M M > > N m DPIE SPLASH PAD 952.445.5135 1 877.632.0503 1 aquatix.playlsi,com Thank you hzrthis opporLun/ty iosubmiiOur response LoUhe referenced request hzrpropasai Enclosed you'!! find deltaJed descnpnmnsofLlhe s«Lensivelevel ofsmokes 0yAquaU,byLandsrapeSUrucLures. In addilhon, \/\/e aic, providing a concelolhual 3d design with supporring product hnhz,rnaUonand ap/oductsand services proposal. ContentsUnderstanding that you may be in the very AMdeOgn concepisLages and that the p/ojecirnay evolve, please note the [oUnwmg qua|i|/caiionsof Aqua&V proposal: ~Th*enc!oseddasign/saninitial concept and has been designedmorder iofit the space and types of[eatures indicated in the requesItforpr000sei ~4quatix's project design is to be necircx|ationsystenn. ~Aquah/smechanical cornponentstubehoused above ground inahcusmgor pqu'pnnentncurnpruvided by others. Please let one know if | may assist you (u/iheras | look forward to hearing frorn youl Sincere|x Gneg5Itoks Managing Di/ector OirecL 9S2'345044,' 06 16 9 ' �� m�0�� w�� byxenuwapeM,uauns From |arge-vo|uroewater features to Urban structu/ps. we do nonrevvith your water and always keep fun at a p,emwurn. Big fun, big value Our splash pad structures and ground sprays are designed are for kids young and o|d.VVeundesLandthatp|ayvalue for little kids is just as /rnportanias durab|eshuriures. Mexib&pnoducfopdonsand rlo||ar-hr/-dollar value areLo 'big' kids. WaterpUaVConsuKtamts L/ke any good archkecL we a/rn for |ong-|asLmg value, Tawhy we engioeeroursj-_)|esh pads with poefahricated, nnerhamca|systerns Uhatoffer /ears o[ rehaNe,easy-to-useoperat'cn, Passion, experience and dedication With over 2Syears in the wateren+ertamrnent bcshiescynu aught savthat we hve and bmath water (but wAhout gd|& VVeenjoyMarmguurpassmnvvithuurouskon)err—it'swhat drives usioprovidehands-ori servkeand gothe extra rni|e vvithour concept and construction deognservices. anM&r�whmm ^� a fffm� aquafix I aqua ix Overall pad dimensions: 651" : 64' W A CusGm VersnSplaslh' C( -)0 gpf-n B SpravStacke, o, 3C) gpnn C d>H,/droSPheJr-e -d, 5 gpl-n! D ACAIMO CCI-Itet- (V doom E Gem :d, 4 gpm F -lot Shcm—i Dome y 5 gpni G w ) Sh'eann Jw a) 5 g:1 -5m H Stieam -1c,r Inangle ol IL, gprn I ()) C-1wn iet« 5 g , Pin J ,2) Junior mate Jewel y /' gl-Drn K Sea Crawler «522> L Acluavatoi Total system Flow Rate:; GPM all a all 11 't I E I MMI ! Ili � Color Palette I 604 aqualfix aquati>, plavisi.com Buttercup Color selection approved- as shown above 0111 Customer Signal-ure aquafix aqUatix playlsi com :21 7m M3� a q u a:: fix aqUatix playlsi com aquafix bV I,-,nds-1r-- " aqUatix playlsi com CL-IStOM VersoSplash(R) The Custom VersoSplash(D provides an unexpected splash. You think you know what's going to happen, then surprise! The bucket dumps in the opposite direction while the water spills forward. It's as fun to watch as it is to stand underneath. PRODUCT SELECTION 9 SprayStacker Kids get to decide what happens with the SprayStacker. By holding the lower buttons closed, they cause the water pressure to build until it shoots out from the very top and onto users below. Cause and effect becomes fun in the sun. Flow range 10 to 20 GPM Flow Range 20 to 30 GPM 37.85 to 75.71 LPM 75.71 to 113.56 LPM PSI 7 PSI 5 Size 15' 7" x 7' 6" Size 81 011 X 11 011 4.78 x 2.31 m 2.44 rn x.30 rn Splash zone 22' 0" x 25' 0" Splash zone 20' 0" Dia. 6.71 x 7.62 m 6.09 rn Dia. HydroSphere 06: aquafix aqUatix playlsi com PRODUCT SELECTION 10 Activity Center The Acitvity Center is a structure that emits multiple water falls from a center supply pool. Users can rotate, slide and turn levers to create unique water patterns. Flow Rate Kids can play tag using the Flow Range 10 to 20 GPM HydroSphere, spinning the sphere to aim a safe, continuous stream of water 18.93 LPM at their buddies. The HydroSphere PSI rotates 90 degrees, 180 degrees or 360 degrees, keeping the challenge exciting. It's a fun new way to play a Size favorite game. 06: aquafix aqUatix playlsi com PRODUCT SELECTION 10 Activity Center The Acitvity Center is a structure that emits multiple water falls from a center supply pool. Users can rotate, slide and turn levers to create unique water patterns. Flow Rate 5 GPM Flow Range 10 to 20 GPM 18.93 LPM 37.85 to 75.71 LPM PSI 4 Splash zone 12' 0" Diameter Size 3'8" x V 0" 3.65 m Diameter 1.16 m x.30 m Splash zone 15' 0" Radius 4.57 m Radius 06: aquafix aqUatix playlsi corn The Gem invites younger kids to run around it to enjoy the refreshing effects of multiple misting sprays. The structure's perimeter is sprinkled with nozzles, offering kids a cool new way to cool off. Flow Range 10 to 20 GPM 37.85 to 75.71 LPM Splash zone 8' 0" Dia. 2.44 m Dia. PRODUCT SELECTION 'T(.,)t Shower Dot -Tie The Tot Shower Dome is a structure that emits a water effect from the top of a 2 foot diameter dome that spreads out around the perimeter and falls onto users below. This small scale structure is a great activity for early age children. Flow range 5 to 10 GPM 18.93 to 37,85 LPM Size 4' 0" x 2' 0" 1.22 x.61 m Splash zone 8' 0" Diameter 2.44 m Diameter 06: aquafix bV:'-'nds-1 f;0 aVllh,WrC, aqUatix playlsi com I PRODUCT SELECTION 12 Stre&n'i Jet Triangle The Stream Jet Triangle is a ground spray element that emits three (3) single streams of water upward. The feature flow rates can be adjusted to increase or decrease the spray height. The Stream Jet Triangle is designed for wet deck applications with no standing water. Users can work together to plug holes and create larger water flow through the unplugged holes. Maximum flow 30 GPM Stream Jet 113.56 LPM Standard flow 15 GPM 56.78 LPM Minimum flow 3 GPM The Stream Jet is a ground spray Size 5'0" x 3'0" element that emits a single strearn of 1.52 x.914 m Splash zone 11' 0" Diameter water upward. The feature flow rates 3.35 m Diameter can be adjusted to increase or decrease the spray height. The Stream Jet is designed for wet deck applications with no standing water. Maximum flow 10 GPM 37.85 LPM Standard flow 5 GPM 18.93 LPM Minimum flow 1 GPM 3.78 LPM Size 5' 01, x 0" 3" 1.52 x.09 m Splash zone 5' 01, x 0" 3" 132 x.09 m 06: aquafix bV:'-'nds-1 f;0 aVllh,WrC, aqUatix playlsi com I PRODUCT SELECTION 12 Stre&n'i Jet Triangle The Stream Jet Triangle is a ground spray element that emits three (3) single streams of water upward. The feature flow rates can be adjusted to increase or decrease the spray height. The Stream Jet Triangle is designed for wet deck applications with no standing water. Users can work together to plug holes and create larger water flow through the unplugged holes. Maximum flow 30 GPM 113.56 LPM Standard flow 15 GPM 56.78 LPM Minimum flow 3 GPM 11.36 LPM Size 5'0" x 3'0" 1.52 x.914 m Splash zone 11' 0" Diameter 3.35 m Diameter 60,6 aquafix- aqUatiX playlsi com Crown Jet The Crown Jet is a ground spray element that emits multiple solid streams of water in one arching direction. The feature flow rates can be adjusted to increase or decrease height and volume of water effect. The Crown Jet is designed for wet deck applications with no standing water. Maximum 5 GPM flow 18.93 QPM Size 3'0„x4,0„ Size .91 x 1.22 m Splash zone 8'0"x8'0” Splash zone 2.44 x 2.44 m PRODUCT SELECTION 13 J U n i o r Water Jewel The Junior Water Jewel is a ground spray element that emits vertical streams of water in an outward arching pattern. The feature flow rates can be adjusted to increase or decrease stream spray heights and projection. The Jr Water Jewel is designed for wet deck applications with no standing water. Flow range 7 GPM 2,13 QPM Size 6'011 x 0'Y 1.83 x.09 rn Splash zone 8' 0" Diameter 2.44 m Diameter 21111 0,\v 06: aquafix bO,-,nds-1 f;0 aVllh,WrC, aqUatix playlsi com Sea Crawler The Sea Crawler is a ground spray element that emits a single stream of water upward and four arching streams of water. The Sea Crawler is designed for wet deck applications with no standing water. Standard flow 5 GPM 18.93 LPM Size 2' 0" x 2' 6" .61 x .76 m Splash zone 4' 6" Diameter 1.37 m Diameter PRODUCT SELECTION 14 FA ON a We- • ]Ak III" �► Recirculation System 1 Aquavator -10"ch c,`at runt: n c 2 Ground Spray Rush p,ay feature "'m "r—'s non_lo etfeets 3 Embed Pod Drain Oram m wast.` to-,Iln•:n.ae .,Ijw imn v; :', :n '7ro.;n,I sur.=." I'd 4 Collector Box I'll" wd I -i rh;Bi nett in ")Hect Ill spla5n Pad v/ah?r T<i retun, to far)k & �Or '.vaste 5 Drain to Waste Valve Box P, have eI ctn<a[ sole:a,ld valve for dlvertind tarn wote'to waste 6 Drain Line to Waste 11.1+,; tN ast!"n+tr+r t" satlltary (,l' Si•vve'r sVS.('l 11 7 Water Play Structures Above ytade spray {eature with vanous wlte, actrnhes 8 Underground Water Reservoir Tank bl h,e j,", `,I,,, t -j & pry pl,mb.a with wat,lr :c-,-] —"!-I :nlu•t loop, rluarhq vkm, —,, S submerslhlc pump out v,t-, 9 Lockable Man Way with Ladder Access Pro, des ea ;v aces for mamt,na-,, of l,at,t reservoir rant, 10 Distribution Manifold le-Plu mhed, Pr: fabru_ateo moth win.el cation blfsv- out - Port 11 Manual Valves Maritally 11 fi"I ealrh 1P'aV tiatUt O5 sIlav hc`lOht an(i ost>nrc 12 Feature Pump Skid ! IL listed, Pre-tabl is Jteil. &pie-F'Iun-Ibed feature pump sl.ld \,, it, adiustable legs 13 filtration Skid and Automated Chemical Controller UL:Iste,I, pre-tabni;�tod, ano F,a,-;?fumbod'Atatlor s6:d & autr+mal <.Y cl:r, _ol �.n hrollar 14 Sand or Cartridge Style Filter P r,,\'Ided with sand med,a or cartridges 15 System Control panel UL L .ted Co tro pa lel I, tot y'strtnt ontrols a d feature 't,"a" of controls I tj,nq oP'- �llo•lal h,ut - (I t ati , o` tune sq— nd of —mo & —off ,—f ro!s 16 Main Power Supply Typically 460 -.Y -,0V, , Ph, -e W HI & 115,.'0\t ' Pha,e ei) FI._ 17 Chemical Treatment PI-.djLlstrr:eni Ind p!"r•p 18 WaterFill Supply Mo,iIl pal wlt-r stopI} v;:th r—Sr:,tro ra+„r hart t20 ,r, SO PS]) tkrN pr(,\'—tvr ty F>l� ally 7') * Optional Equipment A5,,,, ,r nelc- ura,i- eQWr'nlenl C'gaOst YCS, I I`./ Sd, nll'atlJn systunt, & 1�1-ilna water 11-r,t Recirculation System Overview Aquatix' recirculation systems allow for splash pad design to focus on creating enhanced water play in a safe environment without being dictated by water consumption concerns. When utilizing a recirculation system, product selections are based on their play value, product flow rates, and Interactive value. ARC's recirculation system provides this enhanced experience in a water quality treatment system that is safe & easy to operate. Each recirculation system meets or exceeds local health department specifications for water quality. Legend Electrical/Control Wiring Fresh Water Supply •••••••" ................................. Feature Water System Waste Lines d* * ^w"^-,«^",++— Filter Water Supply Water Play Features I Custom Versos lash' I SprayStacker 2 HydroSpher e I Activity Center 2 Gem I Tot Shower Dome - SS 4 Stream Jet I Stream Jet Triangle 2 Crown Jet- Cast Bronze 2 Junior Water Jewel - Cast Bronze I Sea Crawler \/V -i t (--� i p y f e a i i -e d G2" i g n dotes. ® All ab,,-)ve vvatei play features ai e to he the standard product of Ac--ju,.-,T i al iclscapE-- Sti uc, I Li I P';, ® Ail abcIve ground' strl icl:, ii es are flange mounted to conci ete 11 -)ad. All above ground leaftu!-es are ofteo-eci in tine cok)[s. Denim, Plkie Laciorm. Sl,\,,, Peacodl,, Grass. GPeen, Leat. Limon., Black Grown, /Voin. Pl,,ln-1, Ctanbortv Ped, Tan�.-Jonn(--, Fellow, Buttercuo, and White. All c -pound c,pray roatures are I n I L-)ecl an C1 11 IS I C-', I I ed pi k-" o0nc i e beinq powe,--I, aquatix.playlsi com Mechanical System Recirculation System A tato pli-Imbod, pIC'-witod. IntegfatOCi equipment system mountod on an C'p(:,XV chkjd. `-'Vstom t0 consiSt of rnaia rnlvi- il" conhol panel, (i tY._1Uon ;urni?. ccJftl" Cqt, hit :,Li ?1 Sy'St^'n aulornalic chen-)ical t1eatnlc-ni- conLr llet C;aIICJE:'s, -)[-)Cl il,)\i E'teY `_,VSCE`I"i, to C_)t;' -")p'3!;) G OI `i c! 'l -n tilticatiJf? Yates. It, com1 lst of Chlolln(- Lfosion Feeder, Liquid A' -id Pump, ani.-! (11, CI-lcnllcal Solution C'mck, A Este -plumbed, pre -Wired, inteijfated eciuipment Fyste 11 iriounited cin at) epo. y slid Sy,)tem t0 Consist: of a self- 3_ I![ -I 1i 1C1 feat,, re pllrnp With Integial f -`a it ard I nt stainei, C'hed< \/,gIv's, I';C,lation \/alVeS. ea ides. c)I-1':1 I`lovi switch. Syste it to 1,',e capable fel % Qpni f-alure flow rates, Distribution Manifold A r)re.-plumbed l: ls.t l"I E,>el:l;%11 !Yla l;ti) Ci foo all water a.--bvlile9. Manirol, I tc, be cornec-tel:d, tC` feate7re L>UMY ) Clis<:halcje and :lave ail nisdlame lilies With I EOLI,=il tl0\V COntr`CI t0 Wal`ef !:)laV 0I011101-,tS. Prefabricated `mater Reservoir I'.D con-sist of a 25,0 + gallon concrete vel-sel con -pie t`e with access hatch, arcess la' def. Venting pi -P s, Watef level control f!nat, OV(-,1tl0W outlet, SLI Sn-:o sib!0 }lump OU`l SystCm, mounting hafiiWafe and all 0:)Ing and electrical OCJIn(-C.l10f)S specific l0 proj,,z�cl de'SIgn. ACivavator To COI151Sf C? 3low Volk 3i:te 'couch sell`;i r bti'Ithlil t le Cd % Ot the 4YtI jctuie Nh011 pati, -'ns f:nWdh th' tCq of the A':jU:1Vcit0' a Signal Will go to the control pan'l to activate feature -,l,1i-'ply systein for -.t duratioi) of time. Mechanical System Recirculation System Continued Control Panel - On/Off To he an UL isted otojeCt sp7(.-ific designed (,C)nhol panel that will prcwide 1--c-li-T-oler- opeiating ,vsi"---,[-i) 1--,nw-i dish-VUti,cin and system cenh-Cols fci ,' an all on off splash j,: ad system. To oi- a diaryipte:- 1-ilb6iglass C -,r PV(- Lasin will': gr?,te top. Each -ollle(-tor bo\ haS a ncMl Ma1 icapacitv of p�n cI gravity suppiv to wal:er coni-trno n n't vessel. - Rain Diverting Waste Valve Box I(D col)SISL of an ('10ctri,- SOIenoid valv- housed in a plastic bui ia! houl-inci th,-,it will allow [or collector bc,),\es 1-o _sis g, drain t,-, waste when W , I�7LJ! _-I pumpingvsLoni not opciatin _ N M I 0 k 21 Opp IN INININ IN. IN INEENI, II I 111010=1111111 Design Services Design & Construction drawings: collector box installation details, water la Us structure installation on concrete siXIash %zzl, equipment systems installation and hookups. Pad DiL,sign Notes: I Arjulahx bv design services aielbased Cn lett al sill- locahOnl- and Z. Aquatj�by I and�ca;-,.L- '�uuchires design sptvi,-:es do Iiot nclMde soil cot-&-Jons. ciemolihon olanning, site elevati,-)n olar-, ULNitv plannirwi / design Or leic,calion e, -',f uWme,-I. (Lr. hased, water, 4va'-It-� and Powel being availal--Je ar de--,icined area's . f splash pad by -Aherl-.) Ali pein-lits ancl costs of peimiis are n, -)t In"Juded in oui plash pad desicin packaye. ,-I, Design will be pieipa?ecj eased on Aquak,� by Landcicalpe nterpretaLion of 1 oical llealth ,cocle. 5. DCSIOIa 'r)FIStI UC-tl,Dil dl aV,,MCjS Includc scaied Enc ilnOol Stamp Ana 7icic11tionai diav\/irp�is I-issociaced \vih PIC,ject out -sick- of !-):)d to be n,�_ide cAhV rs. (si,Jewal!,S, ands,�aoing electiic,iiI) AqIIVI R11,11-1 CIIPIIY NER Optional Adders 10pti,onal Sctvif-es: System Startup and Training startup. - cn,�. Aquatix by Landsc�.ipe Structui es to N proode ) fa,C (-ia_r Sysf tni y (-I:!,: ec'� t,1-,c'hr,in 0�9y 'Clalancincit and owner training. 01-Aional Prod(Ir-t,,: Sequencing i.,iogiade to allow feature- '(D iandorrflv ti-irn on anCl off in,dtpendntly. Upgi-acle includes the additional oCelectnc Sol no�' valves on each of tN ' - feallufr, supplv ines and in'dividual tin)(---rs to ntcrfa%-o wiU oach solenoid valve. Valvf-,S to be oreplurnbed and prewi?-d on above dlstribul ion UV Disinfection System - _Fcconsist of a Delta UV disinfection unil that is 1,11 listen. NSP certified and evaulai:ed, and FRZ� registered. ji-Ilt has electroj)�c r;C)jjtj-ollei thiat h,ls UV ni, nitors. Unit to be capal-Ae of tl)e filti-ation, flr-\1v i-,3 -, of 7C' -�d onse. q p o To bel rd-ovid( Plurnhing and electri'-al conne,_`i�-�ns by oUhels. Aboveground Mechanical Enclosure - R, c�Dnsist of a metal cbo\/e giYound eniclusi j! >. that will hou"-.e 'h- f0ration skid. hear -ire skid -_-md distribution n-,anif-fld. ' nclosut e to be ForesL GicPen in CC and hav- loc kaDle a, -cess dooi-, MelLal encl-sure to be ins'alled on < onr.'re- s'ab by others. ,Aquatix by Landscape Structures offers on-site supervision and startup services at additional costs. *Above filtration system pricing is based on the use of cartridge filters. Sand filtration systems are available at additional costs. *Water heaters are offered at additional costs. *UV sanitization systems are recommended and offered at additional costs. *Equipment Enclosures are offered at additional costs (otherwise mechanical equipment to be stored in above ground equipment enclosure, by others). Filtration Skid tobeULlisted system capable offiltration rates from 50 gpmtn3OOgpm.Filtration Systems flow rate should bebased ona minimumof30minute turnover rate. System equipment tnbepre- plumbed using all schedule 80 PVC pipe & fittings, pre -wired and mounted onanepoxy painted steel skid with adjustable leveling legs. Skid system tohave main motor control panel that will operate filtration pumnfeature pump, water fill system, chemica|treatment system, and collector box drain to waste valve. 5vstemtobetested prior toshipment. U� �� °=x ovUatmvlaalsicom Filter return *°to chemical / \ system and underground water �� | � x ~ ^ / ir Main Contra /Ponal �� U� ��»��,�~�� location ^ Epoxy painted steel skid with adjustable leveling legs. ~ Self priming filtration pump with integral hair and lint strainer, ^ Sand or Cartridge filter with pressure gauge and pressures/air relief valve. ^ Main system panel with GFObreakers, time clocks, and needed relays. ~ Automatic chemical controller for monitoring and adjustment ofChlorine & pH. ^ Inline Pilot type flow meter. ~ Pump vacuum Gauge ^ Pump pressure Gauge ^ Flow Switch Filtration Sk^ ~ � | ��P� Mom filtration ' —��~~~ Supplied to Activation Bollard(s) ----- suction line. ,Waste Valve Rox(s) `che=ical Treatment Equipment Feature Pump ^ Epoxy painted steel skid with adjustable leveling legs. ~ Self priming filtration pump with integral hair and lint strainer, ^ Sand or Cartridge filter with pressure gauge and pressures/air relief valve. ^ Main system panel with GFObreakers, time clocks, and needed relays. ~ Automatic chemical controller for monitoring and adjustment ofChlorine & pH. ^ Inline Pilot type flow meter. ~ Pump vacuum Gauge ^ Pump pressure Gauge ^ Flow Switch Filtration Sk^ ~ Feature Skid toboUL listed systemcapable of Movv rates from 25OBpnn to5000gpm.System equipment tpbepre plumbed using all schedule 80 PVC pipe &fittings and mounted ona epoxy painted steel skid with adjustable leveling legs, System to be tested prior to shipment. ovUatmvlaaisicom Main Feature Feature Suction Line ~ Self -Priming feature pump with hair and lint strainer. ~ Pump suction check valve and isolation valve. ` Pump discharge isolation valve. ^Pump vacuum gauge ~ Pump pressure gauge Feature t SU.^d Distribution �� product (S Isolation Gauge Valve ~aux Power Supply from Control pa "elFeature Isolation Pump pump L i Valve / Main Feature Feature Suction Line ~ Self -Priming feature pump with hair and lint strainer. ~ Pump suction check valve and isolation valve. ` Pump discharge isolation valve. ^Pump vacuum gauge ~ Pump pressure gauge Feature t SU.^d Distribution Manifolds are pre-p|unnbedwater delivery systems from feature pumping system iowater play features. Standard distribution manifolds consist of manual flow control valves that regulate water flow levels toeach water element for on/off control systems. When creating water play zones orsequencing water play activities, standard distribution manifolds can be upgraded with electric valves or solenoid valves. 646 W�� ~��= onUatmvlaalsicom Optional electrical solenoid valve Pressure Gauge, Typ. for systems with on/off control. Connect to Feature Pump n/,c6u�e, Typ. Winterization blow out fitting 4 To Control Panel ;---ToControl Panel, 4p. N Manual flow _control valve ) ) |�� Optional electrical solenoid control valves for system zoning msequencing comm typical if ^ roWater Play Feotum�Typ. m w ~—�Winterization Drain Valves May Consist of: ~ Available in Stainless Steel orSchedule 8O Gas Welded PVC prefabricated manifold ~ Manual flow control valves ~ Electrical solenoid valves ^ Winterization blow out ~ Pressure gauge Distribution Manifold U U �� U K� ^ �� V �� U Water Reservoir tank is a pre -cast Concrete vessel with lockable access hatch, service ladder and required plumbing connection. Tanks manufactured of 5000 PSI concrete to meet ASTIVI C-913 & C-1227 standards. Tank size to be per project requirements based on splash pad feature flow rate, size of pad, and environmental surroundings. 606 aquafix' "qUatix playlsi com b� 'Indsc'lp�� 0r11632mffml May consist of: • Pre -plumbed with interior suction and outlet fittings • Perimeter filtration return loop • Floating skimmer • Submersible pump for pumping out vault • Overflow line • Automatic water fill valve • All watertight mechanical and electrical penetrations. Water Reservoir Water Make -Lip Supply Lockable Hinged Automatic Access Hatch Overflow Collector Water Level Box Return Line Control J! 1-11--11 —1- 1�—] I Floating Skimmer Pump 'k Skimmer Suction Sump Power Filter Return Filter Pump Inlet Loop Return Supply Filtration Suction Min. 6" Pea Sump Pump Rock or Sand Access Ladder Feature Suction May consist of: • Pre -plumbed with interior suction and outlet fittings • Perimeter filtration return loop • Floating skimmer • Submersible pump for pumping out vault • Overflow line • Automatic water fill valve • All watertight mechanical and electrical penetrations. Water Reservoir Aquavator is a structure that has low voltage touch sensor within the cap of the structure. When patrons touch the top of the Aquavetnrasignal will gotothe control panel toactivate water flow. Aquavatorsactivate the entire splash pad features or designed zoned areas. 64 & �� ~��= ovUatmvlaalsicom ~ Stainless steel 4^ diameter structure with l5O |b mounting flange ~ Mounting hardware ~ Low Voltage Touch sensor ~2piece collar ~2piece skirt �� U U�� n ificatir: MM ECHANICAL COMPONENTS Specons fo Control Panels are used All control panels to be U.L. listed and may incorporate the following: to control simple on/off • Pump(s) motor starters operations of water play • GFCI circuit breakers • Time clock controls to set hours of operation and set duration time of activated devises activities or incorporate • VFD pump controls operation interface • Flow switch controls Programmable Logic • Pressure transducer controls Controller, (PLC), to create Power feeds to manifold distribution solenoid valves Splash pad zoning or • Activation Bollard relay switches • Chemical treatment system power feed sequencing activities. • Vault internal electrical distribution 'All control panels are designed for specific • Waste valve box relay & power feed project needs and require the following GFI • Water heater relay protected power supplies: -All NEMA rated components 230/46OV/3PH./60HZ and 120V/Single -NEMA 4 enclosure Phase/60HZ 61 600 aqua'X aqUatix playlsi com "y Ui, WoS Control Panel Collector Box to consist of 18 inch diameter PVC sump for collection of splash pad recirculation water. Each collector box is capable of 250 gpm gravity drainage Using a 6 inch drain pipe sloped at 1/8 inch per foot slope to water reservoir tank. 606 aquafix,qUatix playlsi com XrIfflzmffml Top of Collector Box to be 1 '-6 SloDIA �—j Flush with Concrete pe Sl �_Ilope 16 Encapsulate Collector Box in Thicken Concrete Slab May consist of: -Structural plastic grating. 6" Sch. 80 PVC Spigot Outlet Connection to Waste 2" Line to Drain to Waste Valve Box Collector box to have an auto drain feature that will evacuate all water to waste when system is not in operation. This feature minimizes the potential contamination of the underground reservoir tank. Collector Box �0. I . . .... TkeWaste Valve Box isan electrical solenoid valve housed inafiberglass burial box that allows the collector box(s)tn drain all water to waste when system is not in operation. Water tobeevacuated through underground waste line fmm collector box through waste valve box toeither site drainage area o, waste. Waste valve box minimizes the potential for contanninat|on cnunderground reservoir, Waste valve box size & quantity to be based onevacuating I inch rain fall per hour over entire splash pad drainage area. 6N A� �� fi=° ovmatmvuwlsicom Undarground Valve Box W/ Raiin—ble Lid LLqMMM brain to Waste Line Efact, From Collector Box Control Panel by Electrician Waste Valve Box water: ~ Fiberglass burial box with removable lid ^ Motorized rain diverting valve ~(2)Drain line connection ports Waste �� Valve �� ^��~= �� ^� Box o�"=Conduit w Frain Collector Control Panel by Electrician Box b rain to W. ste Lin a —7 -- Valve m" �Underground W/ Removable Lid Undarground Valve Box W/ Raiin—ble Lid LLqMMM brain to Waste Line Efact, From Collector Box Control Panel by Electrician Waste Valve Box water: ~ Fiberglass burial box with removable lid ^ Motorized rain diverting valve ~(2)Drain line connection ports Waste �� Valve �� ^��~= �� ^� Box Ultra Violet Disinfection to be a secondary sanitization system for recirculation systen). UV system can be installed on filtration or feature purnping system. • aqua ix quatix playlsi com hV "",ucturcr, UV SYSTEM CONTROL PANEL — May Consist of: • Spare UV bulb • UV system control panel • Service valves • Strainer • Alarm output Optional UV LIGHT CHAMBER — TREATED WATER CLEAR STRAINER OUTLET I: F� 11TE L —k i FILTERED WATER INLET BYPASS/SERVICE VALVES — ADJUSTABLE LEVELING FEET Ultra Violet Disinfection Optional CONCRETE PAC) Equipment Enclosure May Consist of: to be a safe, lockable - Above ground mechanical system, enclosure that will be - Lockable access doors for servicing equipment systems. directly mounted to a - Must be installed on a concrete support pad (by others) with stainless steel concrete support pad next anchorage hardware to water play area. aqualfix aqUatix playlsi com Y1° ve OUTDOOR EQUIPMENT ENCLOSURE REMOVABLE DOORS (TYP BOTH SIRES) Optional CONCRETE PAC) Equipment Enclosure May Consist of: to be a safe, lockable - Above ground mechanical system, enclosure that will be - Lockable access doors for servicing equipment systems. directly mounted to a - Must be installed on a concrete support pad (by others) with stainless steel concrete support pad next anchorage hardware to water play area. aqualfix aqUatix playlsi com Splash Pad Daily Maintenance Outline: 1. Clean pump strainer basket 2. Backwash sand filters or clean cartridge filters. 3. Add chemicals to dispensers. 4. Check and adjust chemical levels in pools. 5. Check chemical supplies and order supplies. 6. Check and clean balancing tank. 7. Clean area of Debris. Estimated Costs: Monthly Energy Usage: $ 550 Water Usage: 7,000 gal. x .003 = $21 Chemical Usage Costs: $150 Maintenance Costs: 2hrs a day x 30days = 60hrs @ $50hr $3,000 Amortized Minor Equipment Repair Costs: $150 Total Monthly Costs: $3,871.00 Seasonal Costs: Spring Opening: 16hrs x $50 = $800 Fall Closing: 16hrs x $50 = $800 City Council Agenda: 01/22/18 2J. Consideration of adopting Resolution #2018-02 accepting the Feasibility Report and setting a public hearing on February 12, 2018 for the Chelsea Road Utility and Street Improvements, Citv Prosect No. 17C001 (SB) The City Council authorized preparation of a Feasibility Report addressing street, trail, sidewalk and utility improvements along Chelsea Road between TH 25 and Fallon Avenue. The segment of Chelsea Road between Edmonson Avenue and west of Fallon Avenue has deteriorated over time and is the last segment of Chelsea Road that has roadside ditches in lieu of curb and gutter with storm sewer. Based on the existing roadway conditions and geotechnical analysis of soil borings obtained in 2017, it is recommended to complete a full -depth pavement reclamation with new bituminous pavement placed along the approximate 1,875 -foot length of Chelsea Road between Edmonson Avenue and Fallon Avenue. It is proposed to widen the road section to 44 feet, add curb and gutter, and construct a stormwater collection system. It is proposed to place a nova chip seal, which is also referred to as ultra-thin bonded wearing course, along Chelsea Road from TH 25 to Edmonson Avenue. It is proposed to change the intersection traffic control at Chelsea Road and Cedar Street to a four-way stop with the installation of stop signs, based on the 2017 traffic warrant analysis performed. It is recommended to monitor traffic conditions after the Fallon Avenue overpass is completed, specifically the eastbound Chelsea Road approach back- up to TH 25. Should this become an issue, installation of a traffic signal and separate right -turn lanes for eastbound and westbound Chelsea Road and northbound Cedar Street should be considered. Based on projected growth rates, it is anticipated that the traffic signal will be needed in 2024; however, it will depend on the growth in the immediate area as well. A roundabout was considered at this intersection; however, because of the unbalanced traffic volumes of each street approach, a traffic signal is recommended as a more feasible alternative to improve traffic operations. Proposed pathway improvements include extending a bituminous trail on the north side of Chelsea Road between Fallon Avenue and Edmonson Avenue and a concrete sidewalk along the south side between Fallon Avenue and Cedar Street. These pathway extensions would complete system gap connections and provide pedestrian facilities on both sides of Chelsea Road to limit crossings. This is the recommendation on collector roadways according to the City's proposed pathway connections guide map. Boulevard tree planting installation along the corridor is proposed with the project. Dual forcernains are proposed to continue to extend along the Chelsea Road boulevard from Cedar Street to the trunk sanitary sewer main just west of Fallon Avenue. This forcemain system, which extends from the Otter Creek lift station, was previously identified in 2005 to address future development in the City's northwest area with the City Council Agenda: 01/22/18 former Heritage/Silver Springs development and was re-evaluated with current land use plans. It is timely to construct the forcemains with this project based on projected growth and to limit construction impacts to one year. Property owners along Chelsea Road were invited to an informational meeting on January 11, 2018 to discuss the project scope and special assessments. Representatives from Aroplax, Midwest Precision Machining and Red Rooster Properties were present. Discussions via phone also took place with Tapper's Holdings, Inc. and Wesley Sprunk. The primary comment was related to questioning the need for sidewalk and trail facilities proposed along Chelsea Road. Al. Budget Impact: The estimated costs for the improvements total $2,731,790, which include a 10% contingency and 22% for legal, engineering, administrative, and financing costs. Special assessments to the benefitting adjacent property owners are proposed for street, storm sewer, trail and sidewalk improvements per the City's assessment policy Funding sources for the proposed improvements include special assessments in order to reimburse a portion of a future bond issue or use of reserves, capital improvement funds, and advancement of State Aid funds to finance the project. A separate agenda item related to advancement of State Aid funds will be forthcoming for Council consideration. A2. Staff Workload Impact: City staff will prepare the necessary documents for the public hearing in accordance with state statutes. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 10 Assessments City Funds Total Street Reconstruction (Edmonson Avenue to Fallon $388,815 $591,371 $980,186 Avenue) Nova Chip Scal _ $117,412 $117,412 (TH25 to Edmonson Avenue) Sidewalk Improvements $83,922 $84,190 $168,112 Trail Improvements $36,922 $63,205 $100,127 Forcemain Improvements - $999,757 $999,757 Storm Sewer Improvements $223,082 $143,114 $366,196 TOTAL $732,741 $1,985,984 $2,731,790 Special assessments to the benefitting adjacent property owners are proposed for street, storm sewer, trail and sidewalk improvements per the City's assessment policy Funding sources for the proposed improvements include special assessments in order to reimburse a portion of a future bond issue or use of reserves, capital improvement funds, and advancement of State Aid funds to finance the project. A separate agenda item related to advancement of State Aid funds will be forthcoming for Council consideration. A2. Staff Workload Impact: City staff will prepare the necessary documents for the public hearing in accordance with state statutes. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 10 City Council Agenda: 01/22/18 1. Motion to adopt Resolution #2018-02 accepting the Feasibility Report and setting a public hearing on February 12, 2018 for Chelsea Road Utility and Street Improvements, City Project No. 17C001 2. Motion to deny adoption of Resolution #2018-02 at this time. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends approving Alternative #1. Chelsea Road has deteriorated over time, is in need of repair and was included in the City's Capital Improvement Plan. It is timely to consider moving forward with these improvements at the same time as the Fallon Avenue overpass project in order to limit major construction and traffic impacts to the year 2018. W01 ta I 109A� . A. Resolution #2018-02 B. Feasibility Report CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2018-02 ACCEPTING THE FEASIBILITY REPORT AND CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE CHELSEA ROAD UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS, CITY PROJECT NO. 17CO01 WHEREAS, a Feasibility Report has been prepared by the City Engineer for the Chelsea Road Utility and Street improvements, City Project No. 17COOl which include: reconstruction of streets listed including the adjustment, construction, reclamation, removal, and/or repair of existing pavenzent; curb and gutter; sanitary sewer, stornz sewer and water supply systems; pathways; sidewalks; traffic control; signage;; and other necessary appurtenant work. WHEREAS, the report was received by the City Council on January 22, 2018; and WHEREAS, the reports provide information regarding whether the proposed project is necessary, cost-effective and feasible; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT HEREB Y RESOL VED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA: The Council will consider the proposed improvements for such street in accordance with the Feasibility Report and the assessment of abutting properties for all or a portion of the cost of the improvements pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 at an estimated total cost of the improvements of $2,731,790. 2. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvements on the 121h day of February, 2018 in the Council Chambers of City Hall at 6:30 p.m. and the Clerk shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing and improvements as required by law. ADOPTED BY the Monticello City Council this 22"d day of January, 2015. CITY OF MONTICELLO Brian Stumpf, Mayor Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator City Council Agenda: 01/22/18 2K. Consideration of adopting Resolution #2018-03 authorizing preparation of a Feasibilitv Report for a 2018 pedestrian improvement vroiect (SB/AS/TP) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Staff is requesting Council authorize preparation of a Feasibility Report addressing pedestrian improvements identified in the downtown implementation plan and the City's recently completed proposed pathway connections guide map as identified at the November 13, 2017 Council workshop and subsequent 2018 budget meetings. A feasibility report and public hearing process is required to be completed for portions of the project due to proposed assessments based on the City's assessment policy. The following improvements were determined to be standalone priority projects by staff as they are not programmed to be included with any upcoming adjacent street improvement projects: • Walnut Street/Broadway Curb Extensions: This was identified in the downtown plan to include extension of curb in the parking lane along Broadway Street to provide a narrower crosswalk length and pedestrian refuge area. An evaluation of pedestrian push button crossing signs will be addressed in the report. Assessments are not proposed for this improvements. $50,000 was the estimated cost for the improvements to be funded by 2017 budget surplus for 2018 construction. 6t" Street Sidewalk Extension (Walnut Street to TH 25): Includes sidewalk extension on the south side of 6t" Street. Will include special assessments to properties fronting the sidewalk, which include the City -owned West Prairie building and Caribou Coffee. The estimated cost is $20,000 with approximately $4,000/each to be assessed to Caribou Coffee and West Prairie Building. 7 1 Street Sidewalk Extension (Cedar Street to post office property): Includes sidewalk extension on the south side of 7th Street. Will include special assessments to properties fronting the sidewalk, which only include Burger King. The estimated project cost is $15,000 with approximately $7,000 assessed to Burger King. The post office has committed to constructing the sidewalk fronting their property in the spring of 2018. • Oakwood Drive Sidewalk Extension (TH 25 to Cedar Street): Includes sidewalk extension on the north side of Oakwood Drive. Permanent and temporary easements are needed from the adjacent properties (McDonalds and Super America) to construct the sidewalk, as there is limited right of way to align the sidewalk. The sidewalk extension to the McDonald's property was last discussed in 2015. At the time, McDonald's agreed to provide the easement in lieu of assessments. Assessments will be revisited again along with discussions on easements needed by Super America. A sidewalk easement on the Hoglund property was secured in 2015 with their plat. The estimated project cost is $40,000 and higher than typical due to fill needed and utility relocations. City Council Agenda: 01/22/18 Easement acquisition costs are to be determined. Assessments based on typical front foot rates would total approximately $8,000. Rolling Woods Park Sidewalk Extension: Includes sidewalk extension along the south side of Bakken Street where it currently terminates, extending to Rolling Woods Park. Several options were brought forward to Council on September 26, 2016 and a survey, design and costs estimates was authorized and completed. To clarify past comments, a wetland delineation is not needed. A small concrete wall could be constructed along the wetland to avoid impacting the wetland. Staff recommends extending the sidewalk to Rolling Woods Park. Funds were secured by Carlisle Village developer in the amount of $11,400 for a portion of this work. The estimated construction cost is $30,000. CSAR 39 Trail (Mississippi Drive to Broadway): Includes extension of 10 -foot wide bituminous trail along the west side of CSAH 39. Residents along Mississippi Drive voiced concerns over a need for a pedestrian connection along CSAR 39 and this segment is identified as a short term (0-5 year) improvement in the City's pathway connections guide map. The Wright County Parks and Pathway Plan identifies a future trail along CSAH 39 as a regional connection and off-road Mississippi River Trail (MRT) route. Trail easements from Liberty Bank will be needed. Easements from Von Hanson's were secured with their development. A very preliminary estimated project cost without easement acquisition is $100,000. It is proposed to complete these improvements as a standalone project instead of adding these improvements to current projects underway to minimize the complexity, funding logistics and delay the schedule for other public projects, such as the Fallon Avenue overpass and the Chelsea Road reconstruction project. In general, the Feasibility Report will incorporate the efforts already completed on the applicable segments and address the additional improvements to package it all into one report identifying the proposed improvements, estimated costs, special assessments, funding sources, preliminary project schedule, and determination as to the necessity, feasibility and cost-effectiveness of the proposed improvements. A topographic survey and preliminary design of the segments not already completed will also be included. Al. Budget Impact: The estimated project costs for the improvements is $250,000 to $300,000 which includes a contingency and indirect costs and does not include easement acquisition costs. A more detailed cost estimate will be provided in the feasibility report. The estimated cost to complete the feasibility report, topographic survey, preliminary design and engage in easement acquisition discussions is $25,000. Funding from the 2017 budget surplus totals $65,000 for the Walnut Street/Broadway curb extensions and 6th Street sidewalk; $40,000 for pathway W City Council Agenda: 01/22/18 connections from the closed bond fund and $11,400 from developer funds for the Rolling Woods sidewalk, totaling $116,400. This leaves $133,600 to $183,600 to be funded by capital improvement funds. Assessments are estimated at $19,000. As noted above, easement acquisition costs are not included in the above costs. A2. Staff Workload Impact: WSB staff will complete the Feasibility Report with utilizing City staff to the maximum extent possible. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to adopt Resolution #2018-03 authorizing preparation of a Feasibility Report for a 2018 pedestrian improvement project 2. Motion to deny adoption of Resolution #2018-03 at this time. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative No. 1. These improvements were identified in the downtown implementation plan and the City's recently completed proposed pathway connections guide map as short term improvements. It is assumed that the City will realize some costs savings in included several pedestrian improvements into one project as opposed to smaller scale standalone projects. UU0t�. A. Resolution #2018-03 B. Project map CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2018-03 AUTHORIZING FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR 2018 PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, it is proposed to construct pedestrian improvements in the areas listed below, including curb extensions, sidewalks, trails, signage; and other necessary appurtenant work, and to assess the benefitting properties for all or a portion of the cost of improvements, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429; • Intersection of Walnut Street and Broadway Street • 6th Street between Walnut Street and TH 25 • 7th Street from Cedar Street to the east • Oakwood Drive from TH 25 to Cedar Street • Bakken Street between Garvey Court and Rolling Woods Park • CSAH 39 between Mississippi Drive and Broadway Street WHEREAS, such Feasibility Report will address the location, existing conditions, proposed improvements, estimated costs, available funding sources, preliminary project schedule, and determination as to the necessity, feasibility, and cost-effectiveness of the proposed improvements; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA: That the feasibility study for proposed improvements be referred to WSB & Associates, and that the Engineer is instructed to report back to the Council with all convenient speed advising the Council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement is necessary, cost-effective, and feasible; whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement; and the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended. ADOPTED BYthe Monticello City Council this 22nd day of January, 2018. CITY OF MONTICELLO Brian Stumpf, Mayor Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator City Council Agenda: 01/22/18 2L. Consideration of approving additional fees for the purchase of land for 213 Chelsea Road (WSI Industries, Inc.) in the amount of $2,300 as related to the Fallon Avenue Overpass Prosect City- Prosect No. 16CO06 (SB/JO) A memorandum of agreement was approved by WSI Industries, Inc. in the amount of $17,000 for purchase of land based on a revised completed market value appraisal dated August 18, 2017. The original appraisal dated July 18, 2017 and presented to Council on August 14, 2017 totaled $14,700 and was later revised to reflect the most accurate easement area and compensation calculations. On November 13, 2017 Council approved payment in the amount of S 14,700 as noted in the agenda item instead of the $17,000 amount. Payment has already been made to WSI Industries in the amount of $14,700 and it is recommended to make an additional payment of $2,300 to full fill the agreement. Al. Budget Impact: The additional compensation amount totals $2,300 and fits within the overall project budget. A2. Staff Workload Impact: Minimal and part of project scope. 1. Motion approving additional fees for the purchase of land for 213 Chelsea Road (WSI Industries, Inc.) in the amount of $2,300, as related to the Fallon Avenue Overpass Project City Project No. 16C006. 2. Motion to deny approval at this time. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends approving Alternative #1 based on the revised appraisal. 0�11II 9 03" 1 Y 10[1117_1 • Memorandum of agreement Fee Owner($):. _ WSI Industries, Inc., a Minnesota corporation Parcel: 5 On this . day of 2017, WSI Industries, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, Owner of the above described parcel of property located in County of Wright, State of Minnesota, did execute and deliver a conveyance of real estate to the City of Monticello. This agreement is now made and entered as a Memorandum of all the terns, and the only terms, agreed upon in connection with the above transaction. It is hereby acknowledged and agreed upon between the parties that: The Owner has been furnished with the approved estimate of just compensation for the property acquired and a summary statement of the basis for the estimate. The Owner understands that the acquired property is for use in connection with the construction of the Fallon Avenue hnprovement Project. The Owner understands and acknowledges that the Agent for the City of Monticello has no direct, indirect, present, or contemplated future personal interest in the property or in any benefits from the acquisition of the property. compensationThat in full •r the conveyance of said property,• shall pay the Owner the sum of r r dollars s 11 S 17.000.00) f• -. Owner understands thapayment must await approvalby • o. In the event of a clerical error, Grantor agrees to cooperate in correcting the error including but not limited to re-signing all documents. It is understood and agreed that the entire agreernew Of flik" �s ' kmtained in this Memorandum of g () '°`` f �, ,_ T and that these documents and Agreement and the Easement Documents dated �"'° �� agreements include all oral agreements, representauoi's„ and cde�,��tis�tc�r�aw between the parties relating to the Fallon Avenue Improvement Project. This Memorandum of Agreement and the Easement Documents may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be deerned an original and all of which, collectively, shall be one and the same agreemcnt. Date: a .. e .%4. GillespieA ent 1=a1��, g ' for the City of Monticello Date. ,. t' ;t ,,,r B y x ' Owner Date: y: City Council Agenda: 01/22/18 2M. Consideration of approving a three-vear contract extension to RES Specialtv Pvrotechnics for the annual Riverfest fireworks show for a total of $28,500 (TM) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The Annual Riverfest event is the largest city celebration of the year, and is hosted by many volunteer organizations within the city with the Monticello Lions taking the lead. Various individuals from these organizations make up the Riverfest Committee which does the planning for the event year-round. The event consists of four days of activities which will take place on July 12-14, 2018. Activities include family night at Pioneer Park, 5k Run, Art in the Park, Bean Bag Tournament, Talent Show, Street Dance, Duck Race, Parade, Queen Coronation, Music in the Park, Bingo and Fireworks, just to name a few. This year's fireworks display will be on Friday, July 13th at dusk and will be in the same location as last year between the Monticello High School and Eastview Elementary. As part of the annual Riverfest celebration, the City of Monticello has been financing the annual fireworks display for a number of years with funding from the Liquor Store Fund. Since 2009, RES Specialty Pyrotechnics has been the fireworks vendor. They are a renowned company throughout Minnesota and the surrounding states. They have done shows at the Mall of America, Target Field, Target Center, Xcel Energy Center, US Bank Stadium, St. Paul Winter Carnival and many other cities. They will also be doing the fireworks at the Super Bowl this year. In the supporting data I have included a list of their clients. Monticello's first contract with RES was from 2009-2011, for total of $24,000. From 2012- 2014, the total was $24,000, and from 2015-2017, the total was $24,600. These nine years of doing business with RES have been years of the economy at a low and they have worked great with keeping the price for Monticello's show to a minimum. Staff is asking council to consider extending the RES Specialty Pyrotechnics contract for an additional three years, not to exceed $28,500 over that period. Speaking with the Director of Business Development for RES, he has indicated that they are very pleased to have worked with the City of Monticello and would be grateful to continue to work with our community. Al. Budget Impact: The budget for the annual Riverfest fireworks display will come from the City's Liquor Fund. A2. Staff Workload Impact: Minimum staff workload impacts for fire department review and Public Works to work with the company to section off the staging area. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Consideration of awarding a three-year contract from 2018 -2020 for the annual Riverfest fireworks display to RES Specialty Pyrotechnics in an amount not to exceed $28,500. 2. Consideration of not awarding a contract for the annual Riverfest fireworks display. City Council Agenda: 01/22/18 C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The City staff recommends awarding a three-year contract to RES Specialty Pyrotechnics for the annual Riverfest fireworks display as outlined in Alternative #l. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • List of RES Specialty Pyrotechnics clients. MINNESOTA COMMUNITIES Edina Little Canada Rockville Albertville Elbow Lake Long Prairie Rosemount Andover Bk River Mankato Rothsay Anoka Elysian Maple Grove Savage Apple Valley Emily Medina Shakopee Arlington Excelsior Melrose Shoreview Avon Faribauh Minnetonka Spring Lake Park Alexandria Gaylord Montgomery St. Joseph Bay Lake Glencoe Monticello St.pau| Becker Grand Forks Montrose St. Peter Belle Plaine Highland Park Moorhead Stacy Bloomington H|tterda| New Brighton Stillwater Briggs Lake Hudson New Prague U|en Burnsville Jamestown New U|m yednais Heights Cambria Jordan Oakdale Waterville Champlin Lake Crystal Pelican Lake Wayzata Cleveland Lake Sylvia Pleasant Lake White Bear Twp Eagan Lakeville Prior Lake Woodbury EdenPrairie LeSueur Ramsey Wyoming PROFESSIONAL SPORTS CORPORATE Guthrie Theatre Grand Minnesota Twins Aveda Corporation Opening NiinnesutoTimbenwo|ves Red Bull Crashed Ice Gopher Sports Marketing Minnesota Vikings Target [CG Productions Saint Paul Saints Essential Health GhowhouseProductions Minnesota Wild Sanford Health BeEvents Minnesota Lynx Best Buy RELIGIOUS/EDUCATIONAL National Hockey League Lifetmuch The Cathedral ofSaint Paul Major League Baseball Cargill St. Joseph Parish Starkey Hearing SPECIALTY VENUES Technologies Concordia College USBank Stadium Cambria Corporation Moorhead TCF Bank Stadium University ofMinnesota Fargodome EVEN T/N1ARKET|NG University ofNorth Dakota Ralph Enge|stadArena Jigsaw Unlimited North Dakota State Verizon Wireless Center Media Loft University Mystic Lake Casino Event Ardhitects Minnesota State University, K8p|sConvention Center metroConnections Moorhead Xce| Energy Center Bishop -McCann Concordia University,St. Paul Target Center StaQetime Productions Dunwoody College of 4|e'us Center Event Lab Technology Church ofSt. Rita Eastern Heights Lutheran Church St. John the Baptist St, Helena Catholic Church Holy Spirit Church OTHER ORGANIZATIONS St� Paul Winter Carnival Twin Valley Boy Scouts Visit St. Paul Foundation Three Rivers Park District Bloomington CVB Explore Minnesota Tourism Twin Cities Pride Minneapolis Downtown Council Special Olympics Minnesota Minnesota State Fair Anoka County Fair Minneapolis Golf Club City Council Agenda: 01/22/2018 2N. Consideration to approve purchase of 576 new street name suns that meet federal regulations per the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for the SE Ouad from M&R Signs of Fergus Falls, MN in the amount of $15,305.92 (TM) In 2010, the Federal Highway Administration enacted a rule that all states and cities must meet federal reflectivity levels for signs by 2015, but due to the enormous cost to city budgets, the Federal Highway Administration revisited the ruling in 2012 and tempered their standard by allowing cities to replace signs based on the city's resources and conditions rather than by a specific date. Since 2010, we have implemented sign replacement when we have done road reconstruction projects and other specific areas without road projects taking place. This year we are proposing to replace 576 street name signs in the SE quad which covers the streets south of I-94 and east of TH 25. Public Works sent out a request for quotes to three companies for the sign replacement. M&R Signs quoted $15,305.92 with freight included, EF Anderson quoted $15,282.57 but freight was not included and Advantage Signs quoted $22,449.43 with freight included. Public Works has done business with both M&R Signs and EF Anderson for years and both companies have been very fair with the city. Staff is recommending M&R Signs for this year's sign project. All work for removing and replacing the signs will be completed by the Street Department. Al. Budget Impact: Appropriate funds are budgeted in the Street & Alley Fund. A2. Staff Workload Impact: Staff workload impacts of this project will be removing the old signs and replacing with the new signs. This work will take place between other Street Department duties. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to authorize the purchase of 576 street name signs for the SE quad of the city from M&R Signs of Fergus Falls, MN for the amount of $15,305.92 including freight. 2. Motion to deny purchasing new street name signs at this time. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends alternative #1 approving the purchase of new street name signs from M&R Signs of Fergus Falls, MN for the price of $15,305.92 freight included. • Copy of quotes. SALES QUOTE Earl FAndersen Quote Number: 013056 Division mSafety Signs Quote Date: 11/21/2017 19784Kenrick Avenue Salesperson: JAKE KREJCE Lakevi|le�Nm5044 ' (952) 884-7300 Customer Number: 0003084 vwww.efa'mn.00m Quote Expiration Date: 12/31/5988 Quoted To: Ship To: CITY OFMONT|CELLO STREET DEPT/PUBLIC WORKS ACCTS PAYABLE 9O01GOLF COURSE ROAD 5O5WALNUT STREET K4ONT|CELLO.W1N 56362 SUITE K8ONT|CELLO.MN 55392 Confirm To: TOM 763-271-3277 Customer P.0, Ship VIA F.O.B. Terms street id WILL CALL weT30 Item Code Item Description Unit Ordered phma Amount STREET 9''vYKGHIP U/C MAX EACH 560.00 19�550 10'94&00 LENTGH48^STREET NAME STREET g^W/GHIP U/CSTACKED EACH 2.00 32.050 54.10 DIRECTIONAL STREET 0 z� �� v�oRDER|SVv|LLCALLATEFA|FGM|PPEDCMARGETOBEADDED�� Net Quote 11,01210 Freight: 00 Sales Tax: OlN Tbaccept this quote please sign here: Quote Total: 11.01210 Less Deposit: 0.00 THIS QUOTE EXPIRES Quote Balance: 11.012.10 Special order items are not returnable. Returns and/or cancelled orders may be sub�toarestocking/cancellation Aretum SALES QUOTE Earl FAndersen Division mSafely Signs 187&4Kenrick Avenue Lakeville.MN5504 (952) 884-7300 wnmwyfa'mn.00m Quote Number: Quote Date: Salesperson: Customer Number: Quote Expiration Date: pooe 1 0130566 11/21QO17 JAKE KREJCE 0003084 12/31/509Q I� �L �� BR�C�ETOTDBER��DY�|D�ARCHOUTOFSTOCKON�YHAVE�25V|NGTOCKATTH|STl�� ~~ Net Quote: 4,270.47 Freight: 0,00 Sales Tax: 0.00 Toaccept this quote please sign here: Quote Total: 4.270.47 Less Deposit: 0.08 THIS QUOTE EXPIRES 1sDAYS FROM DATE oFISSUE. Quote Balance: 4.270.47 Special order items are not returnable, Returns and/or cancelled orders may be subject to a restocking/cancellation charge. A return authorization number is required prior to returning any product. No returns accepted after 60 days from date of original invoice date. Quoted To: To: CITY OFK8ONTCELLO STREET DEPT/PUBLIC WORKS ACCTS PAYABLE 8OO1GOLF COURSE ROAD 5O5WALNUT STREET K8ONT|CELLO'K8N 55362 SUITE K8ONT|CELLO.MN 55362 Confirm To: TOM 763-271-3277 Customer P.O. BRACKETS Ship VIA ��^ 'yV|LL�ALL F.O.B. Terms NET 30 Item Code Item Description Unit Ordered Price Amount E450GRN9 E45VBRACKET GRN 9''PLATES EACH 113.00 28.550 3'226.15 E650GRN9 E05O0WAY STREET EACH 13.00 42.800 550.40 SIGN BRACKETS FOR 8" PLATES -GREEN E250GRN8 E25UBRACKET GRN V" EACH 19.00 25.080 487.82 PLATES I� �L �� BR�C�ETOTDBER��DY�|D�ARCHOUTOFSTOCKON�YHAVE�25V|NGTOCKATTH|STl�� ~~ Net Quote: 4,270.47 Freight: 0,00 Sales Tax: 0.00 Toaccept this quote please sign here: Quote Total: 4.270.47 Less Deposit: 0.08 THIS QUOTE EXPIRES 1sDAYS FROM DATE oFISSUE. Quote Balance: 4.270.47 Special order items are not returnable, Returns and/or cancelled orders may be subject to a restocking/cancellation charge. A return authorization number is required prior to returning any product. No returns accepted after 60 days from date of original invoice date. 1706 1 ST AVENUE NORTH FERGUS FALLS, MN 56537 PHONE 218-736-5681 FAX 218-736-4070 Quote To: MONTICELLO, CITY OF OFFICE OF PUBLIC WORKS 909 GOLF COURSE ROAD MONTICELLO, MN. 55362 Phone No: 763-271-3277 Fax No: 763-271-3272 QUOTATION Quote No: 10657 Date: 12/13/17 Attention: ---Iv � �� r -c- 5 QUANTITY STOCK CODE DESCRIPTION 8 500-01579 SNSFS30"X09-00"063SFHIGRDN SNS -SF -HI -GRN -30"X09 00"X063 -W **6" SERIES C U/C WHITE HIGH Page 1 of 1 Quoted By: TYLER EACH LINE TOTAL 14.31 11448 LINE TOTALS: SALES TAX, FREIGHT: QUOTE TOTAL: 15.23 1703 17.95 19.76 35.44 39.00 5191 609.20 2656.68 2154.00 4979 52 815 12 3354.00 622.92 5:305,92 0.00 0.00 15305.92 **INTENSITY PRISMATIC COPY AND **3/8" BORDER ON A GREEN HIGH **INTENSITY PRISMATIC BACK- **GROUND..SHALLOW KNOB EACH **END_..1/4" HOLE IN KNOB 1" **FROM EDGE OF SIGN TO CENTER **OF HOLE.. NOTCHED -1-1/2" **RADIUS CORNERS.. **SINGLE FACED.. **SEE ATTACHED LIST** 40 500-01756 SNSFS36"X09 00"063SFHIGRDN SNS-SF-HI-GRN-36"X09.00"X063-W **SAME AS ABOVE BUT 36" **SEE ATTACHED LIST** 156 500-01929 SNSFS42"X09.00"063SFHIGRDN SNS-SF-HI-GRN-42"X0900"X063-W **SAME AS ABOVE BUT 42" **SEE ATTACHED LIST** 120 500-02107 SNSFS48"X09.00"063SFHIGRDN SNS -SF -HI -GRN -48"X09 00"X063 -W **SAME AS ABOVE BUT 48" **SEE ATTACHED LIST** 252 500-02285 SNSFS54"X09.00"063SFHIGRDN SNS-SF-HI-GRN-54"X09.00"X063-W **SAME AS ABOVE BUT 54" **SEE ATTACHED LIST** 23 014-200062 G129RGS9-GRN 2 WAY FOR 9"-RNEBTREET SIGN BRACKET ASSEMBLY 86 014-200061 G149RGD9-GRN 4 WAY FOR 9"-RNESTREET SIGN BRACKET ASSEMBLY 12 014-200014 G169RGT9-GRN 6 -WAY FOR 9"-RNESTREET SIGN BRACKET ASSEMBLY FOB FERGUS*FALLS******* Page 1 of 1 Quoted By: TYLER EACH LINE TOTAL 14.31 11448 LINE TOTALS: SALES TAX, FREIGHT: QUOTE TOTAL: 15.23 1703 17.95 19.76 35.44 39.00 5191 609.20 2656.68 2154.00 4979 52 815 12 3354.00 622.92 5:305,92 0.00 0.00 15305.92 Advantage Signs & Graphics, Inc 75 S Owasso Blvd W St. Paul, MN 55117 651-636-9998 ESTIMATE # 00033208 Prepared For: City of Monticello 505 Walnut Ave Ste 1 Monticello, MN 55362-8822 United States QTY. ITEM NO. 558 225 279 999 Prepared By: Erin Benesch Direct Line 651-636-6511 erin@advansign.com SHIP VIA SHIP DATE DESCRIPTION 9" Single sided street name sign - white on green notched and punched for E Series Brackets - Two holes - 1.5" Radius Corners HIP Reflective on .080 Aluminum. E Series Brackets 4 way Green for tubular post mount By my signature, I authorize work to begin and agree to pay the amount in full according to the terms of this agreement: Signature Date TERMS DATE PG. Net 30 12/22/2017 1 PRICE EXTENDED TX. $23.75 $13,252.50 $32.10 $8,955.90 SALE AMT. $22,208.40 FREIGHT $225.00 X SALES TAX $16.03 TOTAL AMT. $22,449.43 PAID TODAY $0.00 BALANCE DUE $22,449.43 City Council Agenda: 01/22/18 20. Consideration to ratifv Jim Lindberg to an at -large position on the Bertram Chain of Lakes Advisory Council (AS) 7 3 X 117 Noce W.1 ►`17YXI N 2 " 11,111U011� The City Council is asked to ratify the Bertram Chain of Lakes Advisory Council's recommendation to appoint Jim Lindberg as an at -large member, filling a vacant seat on the Council. Mr. Lindberg has been an active member of the BCOL Advisory Council since its inception in 2009, serving as the Monticello School District representative. However, beginning in 2018, the School District position will be filled by another representative selected by the district. Interim superintendent Dr. Michael Favor will be filling the position in the near -ten -n. Given that one of the four at -large positions was recently vacated, the Advisory Council motioned at its January regular meeting to appoint Mr. Lindberg to the position, given his interest and past service. Mr. Lindberg is a resident of Wright County. According to the bylaws of the Bertram Chain of Lakes Advisory Council, the City Council and County Board ratify all at -large positions. Council will note that the BCOLAC bylaws were also recently amended to account for the merger of the Monticello Parks Commission and MCC Advisory Board. The MCC position was therefore eliminated from the Advisory Council. The Monticello Parks & Recreation Commission will be appointing a representative member to the Advisory Council at an upcoming meeting to replace former Chair Larry Nolan. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to recommend the appointment of Jim Lindberg to fill the vacant at -large position of the Bertram Chain of Lakes Advisory Council. 2. Motion of other. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff defers to the BCOLAC and City Council on matters of appointment. W Wel Oka I 109A� . A. Bertram Chain of Lakes Advisory Council Bylaws Resolution Adopting an Ordinance Creating The Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park Advisory Council WHEREAS, Wright County and the City of Monticello has recognized the need to establish a Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park Advisory Council to provide information to determine the usage, operation, management and functions, of the Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park, and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the County Board of Commissioners for Wright County, Minnesota, and the City Council for the City of Monticello, Minnesota, hereby ordains: Article I Name of the Council The name of the organization shall be the Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park Advisory Council. Article II Membership The Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park Advisory Council shall consist of thirteen members as follows: • (2) Monticello City Council Members, as designated by the City Council • (l) Monticello City Parks Commission Member, as designated by the Parks Commission • (2) Wright County Commissioners, as designated by the County Board • (1) Wright County Parks Board Member, designated by the Parks Advisory Board • (1) Monticello Township Officer or Representative, as designated by the Township • (4) Citizens at large appointed by the balance of the Advisory Council, upon approval of the Monticello City Council and the Wright County Board of Commissioners. • (1) Monticello School District Representative, as designated by the School District • (l) Monticello Community Center Advisory Board Member, as designated by the MCC Advisory Board and: (1) Ex Officio Non -Voting Member from the YMCA, as designated by the YMCA Article III Term of Office The term of the regular at large members shall be for three (3) years and shall be staggered so that no more than two (2) members' terms expire in a given year. All regular appointments shall expire at the first Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park Advisory Council meeting of the new calendar year. Article IV Attendance It is the County Board of Commissioners and Monticello City Council's intention to encourage members to attend all meetings. Should any member be absent for more than three meetings in a calendar year, that member may be subject to replacement. Pagel of 3 Article V Vacancv Any vacancy in the at large membership shall be filled by the recommendation of the balance of the Advisory Council, followed by approval of the Monticello City Council and the Wright County Board of Commissioners. Any vacancy in the regular members shall be filled by the appointing body, and such appointee shall serve for the term. Article VI Officers Section 1. Elections The Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park Advisory Council shall elect at its January meeting from its membership, a Chair, and a Vice -Chair who shall serve for a term of one year and shall have such powers as may be prescribed in the rules of said Council. Section 2. Duties of Chair The Chair shall preside at all meetings and shall have the duties normally conferred and parliamentary usage of such officers. Section 3. Duties of Vice -Chair The Vice -Chair shall act for the Chair in his/her absence. Section 4. Duties of Secretary A Secretary may be appointed who is not a member of the Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Advisory Council, but can be employed as a member of County or City staff. The Secretary shall keep the minutes and records of the Advisory Council; and with the assistance of other staff as is available, shall prepare the agenda of the regular and special meetings for Advisory Council members, arrange proper and legal notice of hearings when necessary, attend to correspondence of the Advisory Council and other duties as are normally carried out by a secretary. Article VII Committees Currently there are four (4) active committees established by the Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park Advisory Council: • Park Use Committee • Athletic Complex Committee • Technical and Resources Committee • Negotiations Committee The Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park Advisory Council may establish committees to meet as needed. Page 2 of 3 Article VIII Meetings Section 1. Meetings shall be held on the first Friday of each month, beginning at 8:00 a.m. In the event of a conflict with a holiday or special events, a majority at any meeting may change the date and location of the meeting. The meeting shall be open to the general public. Section 2. Special meetings may be called by the Chair and Vice -Chair together or six (6) members of the Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park Advisory Council. Section 3. Proper and legal notice of meetings, special meetings, and meeting cancelations shall be posted as required by the Secretary of the Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park Advisory Council, at and posted at the Wright County Government Center and Monticello City Hall. Article IX Quorum A majority of the total voting Advisory Council members shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. Article X Duties of the Advisory Council It shall be the duty of the Advisory Council, with staff assistance, to study and provide information to determine the usage, operation, management and functions, and make recommendations to the County Board of Commissioners and the City Council in respect thereof, including general and specific development standards and criteria for evaluating specific uses, policy, to the extent and objectives of County and City participation in outdoor recreation and programs for coordination with other groups or agencies. Article XI Amendments These bylaws may be recommended to be amended by a majority vote of the existing membership of the Advisory Council, after full notice has been given in writing to all members, with final approval by the Wright County Board of Commissioners and the Monticello City Council. Passed this day of , 20_, by the Wright County Board of Commissioners. Passed this day of , 20, by the Monticello City Council. Page 3 of 3 City Council Agenda: 01/22/18 2P. Consideration of adopting Resolution #2018-04 approving the amended bvlaws for the Bertram Chain of Lakes Advisory Council. (AS) A. REFERENCEAND BACKGROUND: The City Council is asked to adopt proposed amendments to the Bertram Chain of Lakes Advisory Council bylaws. The amendments are proposed to account for the merger of the Monticello Parks Commission and MCC Advisory Board and to update the active sub-cotmnittees of the Advisory Council. In 2017, the MCC Advisory Board was dissolved by the City, with representation shifting to the Parks Commission as a Parks & Recreation Commission. As such, the Bertram Chain of Lakes Advisory Council has proposed an amendment consistent with the action, recognizing the Monticello Parks & Recreation Commission and eliminating the MCC Advisory Board representative. In addition, as the acquisitions associated with the planned park boundary have now been completed, the Negotiations sub -committee is no longer active. The amendment proposed reflects an update to the sub -committee listing in that regard. The Bertram Chain of Lakes Advisory Council reviewed the amendments at its regular meeting on January 5th and recommends unanimously the adoption of the proposed amendments. The City Council recognized the Bertram Chain of Lakes Advisory Council as an advisory committee regarding the Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park by ordinance and adopted the Advisory Council's bylaws in 2014. The Wright County Board of Commissioners has received a similar request related to the amended bylaws and will consider action on January 23rd, 2018. Al. Staff Impact: None. Staff liaison work to the Advisory Council remains unchanged with the adoption of the amended bylaws. A2. Budget Impact: None. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to adopt Resolution #2018-04 approving the amended bylaws for the Advisory Council. 2. Motion to table for further research and discussion. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the amended bylaws for the Advisory Council. The amendments reflect the merger of the Parks and MCC boards and further the 2 active committees for the organization. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Resolution 2018-04 B. Bertram Chain of Lakes Advisory Council Bylaws — Proposed Amendments C. Bertram Chain of Lakes Advisory Council Bylaws — Final w/Amendments CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NUMBER #2018-04 WHEREAS, in 2014 the City of Monticello adopted Ordinance #598 creating the Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park Advisory Council ("Advisory Council") and adopted Resolution 2014-046 approving the Bylaws for the Advisory Council; WHEREAS, the Advisory Council consisted of 13 members representing the Monticello City Council, Parks Commission and Community Center Advisory Board, Wright County Commissioners and Wright County Park Board, a representative of Monticello Township, a representative of the Monticello School District, and citizens appointed by the balance of the Advisory Council, and; WHEREAS, the Advisory Council had established four committees, the Park Use Committee, the Athletic Complex Committee, the Technical and Resource Committee and the Negotiations Committee; WHEREAS, in 2017 the Monticello Community Center Advisory Board was dissolved by the City, with representation shifting to the Parks Commission as a "Parks and Recreation Commission", and the Negotiations Committee is no longer active; WHEREAS, the Advisory Council has proposed amendments to the Bylaws consistent with the elimination of the MCC Advisory Board representative, recognizing the Monticello Parks and Recreation Commission, and updating the committee listings; and WHEREAS, the City Council has evaluated the proposed amendments to the Bylaws for the Advisory Council. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, that: The City Council of the City of Monticello hereby approves the amendment to the Bylaws reflecting the merger of the Monticello Parks and Recreation Commission, and the active committees for the organization; and 2. The City Council of the City of Monticello hereby approves and adopts Resolution 2018- 04 approving the amended Bylaws for the Advisory Council, attached hereto as Exhibit "A„ 196o59vl APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of , 2018, by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. CITY OF MONTICELLO In Brian Stumpf, Mayor ATTEST: Jeff O' Neill, City Administrator 196059v1 2 196059vl Resolution Adopting an Ordinance Creating The Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park Advisory Council WHEREAS, Wright County and the City of Monticello has recognized the need to establish a Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park Advisory Council to provide information to determine the usage, operation, management and functions, of the Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park, and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the County Board of Commissioners for Wright County, Minnesota, and the City Council for the City of Monticello, Minnesota, hereby ordains: Article I Name of the Council The name of the organization shall be the Bertram Chain of'Lakes Regional Park Advisory Council. Article 11 Membership The Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park Advisory Council shall consist of thirteen members as follows: • (2) Monticello City Council Members, as designated by the City Council • (1) Monticello City Parks and RecreationCommission Member. as designated by the Parks Commission • (2) Wright County Commissioners, as designated by the County Board • (1) Wright County Parks Board Member, designated by the Parks Advisory Board • (l) Monticello Township Officer or Representative, as designated by the Tovvnship • (4) Citizens at large appointed by the balance of the Advisory Council, upon approval of the Monticello City Council and the Wright County Board of Commissioners. • ( I ) Monticello School District Representative, as designated by the School District ® Deleted: '�1---111 Monticello Community Center Advisory Board and: Member, as designated by the MCC Advisory Board¶ (1) Ex Officio Non -Voting Member from the YMCA, as designated by the YMCA Article III Tenn of Office The term of the regular at large members shall be for three (3) years and shall be staggered so that no more than two (2) members' terms expire in a given year. All regular appointments shall expire at the first Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park Advisory Council meeting of the new calendar year. Article IV Attendance It is the County Board of Commissioners and Monticello City Council's intention to encourage members to attend all meetings. Should any member be absent for more than three meetings in a calendar year, that member may be subject to replacement. Page 1 of 3 Article V Vacancy Any vacancy in the at large membership shall be filled by the recommendation of the balance of the Advisory Council, followed by approval of the Monticello City Council and the Wright County Board of Commissioners. Any vacancy in the regular members shall be filled by the appointing body, and such appointee shall serve for the term. Article VI Officers Section 1. Elections The Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park Advisory Council shall elect at its January meeting from its membership, a Chair, and a Vice -Chair who shall serve for a term of one year and shall have such powers as may be prescribed in the nlles of said Council. Section 2. Duties of Chair The Chair shall preside at all meetings and shall have the duties normally conferred and parliamentary usage of such officers. Section 3. Duties of Vice -Chair The Vice -Chair shall act for the Chair in his/her absence. Section 4. Duties of Secretary A Secretary may be appointed who is not a member of the Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Advisory Council, but can be employed as a member of County or City staff. The Secretary shall keep the minutes and records of the Advisory Council; and with the assistance of other staff as is available, shall prepare the agenda of the regular and special meetings for Advisory Council members, arrange proper and legal notice of hearings when necessary, attend to correspondence of the Advisory Council and other duties as are normally carried out by a secretary. Article VII Committees Currently there are _: (__,) active committees established by the Bertram Chain of Deleted: four Lakes Regional Park Advisory Council: Deleted: 4 • RcPional/Passivc Park Use Committee • Athletic Complex Committee • Technical and Resources Committee Deleted:-4--Ncgotiattons Conunrttee¶ The Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park Advisory Council may establish committees to meet as needed. Article VIII Meetings Page 2 of 3 Section 1. Meetings shall be held on the first Friday of each month, beginning at 8:00 a.m. In the event of a conflict with a holiday or special events, a majority at any meeting may change the date and location of the meeting. The meeting shall be open to the general public. Section 2. Special meetings may be called by the Chair and Vice -Chair together or six (6) members of the Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park Advisory Council. Section 3. Proper and legal notice of meetings, special meetings, and meeting cancelations shall be posted as required by the Secretary of the Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park Advisory Council, at and posted at the Wright County Government Center and Monticello City Hall. Article IX Quorum A majority of the total voting Advisory Council members shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. Article X Duties of the Advisory Council It shall be the duty of the Advisory Council, with staff assistance, to study and provide information to determine the usage, operation, management and functions, and make recommendations to the County Board of Commissioners and the City Council in respect thereof, including general and specific development standards and criteria for evaluating specific uses, policy, to the extent and objectives of County and City participation in outdoor recreation and programs for coordination with other groups or agencies. Article XI Amendments These bylaws may be recommended to be amended by a majority vote of the existing membership of the Advisory Council, after full notice has been given in writing to all members, with final approval by the Wright County Board of Commissioners and the Monticello City Council. Passed this day of _, 20_, by the Wright County Board of Commissioners. Passed this day of , 20, by the Monticello City Council. Page 3 of 3 Resolution Adopting an Ordinance Creating The Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park Advisory Council WHEREAS, Wright County and the City of Monticello has recognized the need to establish a Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park Advisory Council to provide information to determine the usage, operation, management and functions, of the Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park, and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the County Board of Commissioners for Wright County, Minnesota, and the City Council for the City of Monticello, Minnesota, hereby ordains: Article I Name of the Council The name of the organization shall be the Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park Advisory Council. Article II Membership The Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park Advisory Council shall consist of thirteen members as follows: • (2) Monticello City Council Members, as designated by the City Council • (1) Monticello City Parks and Recreation Commission Member, as designated by the Parks Commission • (2) Wright County Commissioners, as designated by the County Board • (1) Wright County Parks Board Member, designated by the Parks Advisory Board • (1) Monticello Township Officer or Representative, as designated by the Township • (4) Citizens at large appointed by the balance of the Advisory Council, upon approval of the Monticello City Council and the Wright County Board of Commissioners. • (1) Monticello School District Representative, as designated by the School District and: • (1) Ex Officio Non -Voting Member from the YMCA, as designated by the YMCA Article III Term of Office The term of the regular at large members shall be for three (3) years and shall be staggered so that no more than two (2) members' terms expire in a given year. All regular appointments shall expire at the first Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park Advisory Council meeting of the new calendar year. Article IV Attendance It is the County Board of Commissioners and Monticello City Council's intention to encourage members to attend all meetings. Should any member be absent for more than three meetings in a calendar year, that member may be subject to replacement. Pagel of 3 Article V Vacancv Any vacancy in the at large membership shall be filled by the recommendation of the balance of the Advisory Council, followed by approval of the Monticello City Council and the Wright County Board of Commissioners. Any vacancy in the regular members shall be filled by the appointing body, and such appointee shall serve for the term. Article VI Officers Section 1. Elections The Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park Advisory Council shall elect at its January meeting from its membership, a Chair, and a Vice -Chair who shall serve for a term of one year and shall have such powers as may be prescribed in the rules of said Council. Section 2. Duties of Chair The Chair shall preside at all meetings and shall have the duties normally conferred and parliamentary usage of such officers. Section 3. Duties of Vice -Chair The Vice -Chair shall act for the Chair in his/her absence. Section 4. Duties of Secretary A Secretary may be appointed who is not a member of the Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Advisory Council, but can be employed as a member of County or City staff. The Secretary shall keep the minutes and records of the Advisory Council; and with the assistance of other staff as is available, shall prepare the agenda of the regular and special meetings for Advisory Council members, arrange proper and legal notice of hearings when necessary, attend to correspondence of the Advisory Council and other duties as are normally carried out by a secretary. Article VII Committees Currently there are three (3) active committees established by the Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park Advisory Council: Regional/Passive Park Use Committee Athletic Complex Committee Technical and Resources Committee The Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park Advisory Council may establish committees to meet as needed. Article VIII Meetim4s Page 2 of 3 Section 1. Meetings shall be held on the first Friday of each month, beginning at 8:00 a.m. In the event of a conflict with a holiday or special events, a majority at any meeting may change the date and location of the meeting. The meeting shall be open to the general public. Section 2. Special meetings may be called by the Chair and Vice -Chair together or six (6) members of the Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park Advisory Council. Section 3. Proper and legal notice of meetings, special meetings, and meeting cancelations shall be posted as required by the Secretary of the Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park Advisory Council, at and posted at the Wright County Government Center and Monticello City Hall. Article IX Quorum A majority of the total voting Advisory Council members shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. Article X Duties of the Advisory Council It shall be the duty of the Advisory Council, with staff assistance, to study and provide infonnation to determine the usage, operation, management and functions, and make recommendations to the County Board of Commissioners and the City Council in respect thereof, including general and specific development standards and criteria for evaluating specific uses, policy, to the extent and objectives of County and City participation in outdoor recreation and programs for coordination with other groups or agencies. Article XI Amendments These bylaws may be recommended to be amended by a majority vote of the existing membership of the Advisory Council, after full notice has been given in writing to all members, with final approval by the Wright County Board of Commissioners and the Monticello City Council. Passed this day of _ , 20_, by the Wright County Board of Commissioners. Passed this _ day of , 20, by the Monticello City Council. Page 3 of 3 Council Connection January 22, 2018 /�� CITYOF o ADMINISTRATION Mississippi Room Wireless Microphones In the fall of 2017 we began experiencing problems with the wireless microphones in the Mississippi Room. Bill Bruce of the Sherburne Wright Cable Commission worked on the problem and found that the FCC auctioned off the wireless frequency range the microphones were using. Once other entities could use the frequency, we began experiencing interference. Mr. Bruce found an alternative frequency, but it required new microphones. The cable commission purchased new wireless microphones that are now installed and we should be received new wireless lavalier microphones shortly. 2017 Trailblazer Data Staff requested preliminary ride numbers from Trailblazer at the beginning of the year. The final numbers will be submitted to MnDOT in March, but these initial estimates give us a strong indicator of Trailblazer ride trends for last year. The numbers below are for the entire calendar year of 2017. Total Rides = 253,072 Wright County Only =116,372 (46%) Sibley and McLeod Counties Only = 136,700 (54%) The ridership for the top three cities in Wright County are as follows: #1) Buffalo Total Rides = 66,767 #2) Monticello Total Rides =18,416 #3) Cokato Total Rides = 5,311 r CITE' OF Mo4i�eflo C��]►��lJ/�i�l i11�'f 7 �lij �11C��►��.i�l Planning Commission Workplan 2018 The Planning Commission held a workshop in December for the purpose of reviewing a draft 2018 workplan. At its regular meeting in December, the Commission motioned to adopt a 2018 Workplan, which is attached for Council's reference. In developing the workplan, the Commission reviewed the status and activity related to the 2017 Planning Commission Workplan. The Commissioners then provided feedback to assist staff in preparation of the draft 2018 plan for review. The workplan drafted and ultimately adopted includes those items in progress or requiring completion from the 2017 plan, as well as new goals and objectives in support of the 2017 Strategic Plan and Comprehensive Plan. The workplan provides staff and the Commission with guidance in planning activities for the coming year. Planning Commission Roles & Land Use Basics Consulting City Planner Steve Grittman will be providing a short training session on the roles and responsibilities of Planning Commissioners, as well as an overview of basic land use tools, statutes and case law. The session will be held at 4:30 PM on February 6th. The session is an open meeting and Council members are more than welcome to attend. fol, Monticello Planning Commission 2018 Goals & Objectives Workplan Monticello The Monticello Planning Commission is established to advise the Mayor, Council and Community Development Department in matters concerning planning and land use matters; to review and make recommendations regarding the Monticello Comprehensive Plan, subdivision and zoning ordinances and other planning rules and regulations; to establish planning rules and regulations; and to conduct public hearings. 2018 Statement: The Planning Commission will support the efforts of the City Council to achieve the 2017/2018 Strategic Plan and will review its long- and short-term planning framework for necessary updates or amendments which address the changing land use needs and goals of the community. The Planning Commission will work collaboratively with other City boards and commissions in its work to achieve the strategic goals of the city. Comprehensive Plan General • Review Implementation Strategies (Chapter I - Framework) for items remaining to accomplish. o Update of Subdivision Ordinance in conjunction with overall City Code recodification. Land Use As the City's primary planning agency, actively lead and participate in 2018 Comprehensive Plan Land Use update process. o Evaluate Places to Work/Industrial land area inventory and site development challenges in support of increasing and diversifying the tax base and providing living wage employment opportunity. o Develop recommendations for residential density identification within the City's growth area in support of Comprehensive Plan goals and increasing residential lot inventory and development. o Analyze and recommend land use planning designations for Silver Springs and Interchange planning areas. o Review in more detail the commercial land inventory and recommend zoning classification in support of the City's long-range goals. Support the implementation of the Downtown Small Area Plan o Participate in zoning ordinance amendments corresponding to plan goals. Transportation • Receive an update on the City Capital Improvement Plan - the City's guide to capital investment within the community; determine any required actions steps associated with priority capital projects. • Respond to the TH 25 Corridor Study as necessary and directed by the City Council. Park & Pathway • Consider for adoption an appendix to the System Plan to include needed pathway corridor connections to strengthen the City's goal of a more walkable and bikeable community. Economic Development • Develop an understanding of and support the EDA's role in redevelopment, housing and economic development, including: o Marketing of vacant property and redevelopment sites o Affordable housing o Rehabilitation of housing o Downtown development/redevelopment programs Zonin.z Ordinance • Complete ordinance updates in support of the Downtown Small Area Plan, focusing on zoning strategies to support use and redevelopment of underutilized properties. • Complete a community evaluation for purpose of evaluate and recommendation on performance standards, including: o General site landscaping standards o Dynamic display standards o Noise • Analyze industrial use standards, including building material and landscaping requirements. • Pending the adoption of new flood hazard determinations, adopt an amendment to the Floodplain Overlay District which provides consistency with State regulations. Research & City Department Update Topics As resources and time allow, the Planning Commission will consider research and information related to the following topic areas, which are listed in priority order. To is E-cigarettes/vapor lounges, zoning and state regulations Complete streets planning Zoning for medical marijuana Zoning for "air bed and breakfasts" Land use impacts related to driverless vehicles Review the current permitting process and categories for Home Occupations r CITE' OF Mo4i�eflo COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Recently Attended Meetings: • Wright County Economic Development Partnership Holiday Gathering - December 7, 2017 • Rotary Club Meeting - December 11, 2017 • Rotary Club Meeting - December 18, 2017 • Chamber of Commerce Meeting - January 16, 2018 Adopted 2018 IEDC Work Plan The IEDC adopted the 2018 Workplan at their regular meeting on January 2, 2018. Please refer to attached Plan Adopted 2018 EDA Work Plan The EDA adopted the 2018 Workplan at their regular meeting on January 10, 2018. Please refer to attached Plan Modification of SCDP (Small Cities Development Program) and MIF (Minnesota Investment Fund) Loan Program Guidelines Staff recently proposed that the EDA modify the SCDP Loan Guidelines to better meet prospective borrower's needs and to be consistent with the recent changes in the GMEF Loan Program Guidelines (changes regarding terms and interest rates made in 2017). The proposed changes relate to the required equity contribution which is currently 10 percent of a total finance package and the payment term for equipment loans and the real estate balloon payment timeframe. The recommended changes to this program were brought to the EDA due to the discovery of clarifying administrative documents wherein the City Council asked MN -DEED to appoint the EDA as the governing authority for these grant dollars. Please refer to further explanation about this request in below paragraph and also see the attached supporting documents. The SCDP Loan program is intended to be a gap funding resource. It can help fill the 15 to 30 percent of funding that a bank cannot ... or will not fund. In June 2017, the EDA discussed making possible changes to the equity requirements to the GMEF Guidelines and then adopted those modifications during the July 2017 meeting. The specific changes consist of adjusting the equity requirement to a range of 5 to 10 percent. Interest rate tiers were also established to reflect a lower equity contribution as per comments from the EDA. Council Connection - 01/22/18 The repayment term language proposal stems from feedback from businesses and bankers. The SCDP's current term language includes a 5 -year balloon payment. Extending this out to 10 years is more helpful to borrowers as it will allow additional time (60 additional months) to prepare to make a large balloon payment. The EDA amended the GMEF Loan Guidelines in early 2017 to make these exact term modifications. INDUSTRIAL & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE 2018 ACTION STATEMENT WORKSHEET Mission Statement: The Monticello IEDC will advocate industrial and economic growth within the City of Monticello by promoting awareness and communication efforts on behalf of the business community. Goal: The IEDC is dedicated to being pro -active in following the objectives and policies established in the Monticello Comprehensive Plan. It is the intention of the IEDC to work within the areas identified below as supporting objectives and actions. Objective: Retaining Jobs 1. Encourage business retention within Monticello. a. Business retention visits by IEDC members to long standing business in the community to help grow stronger relationships between our businesses and City Hall. b. Discuss the needs of businesses for development of a Retention Action Plan. c. Market and present various programs available via the City and EDA. 2. Recognize the contributions of Monticello manufacturers through organization of and participation in industry -related events. a. Continue Industry of the Year Breakfast. b. Assist in development and promotion of a tour of Monticello Industrial Businesses. c. Focus on Manufacturing week 2018 and tour. 3. Enhance Workforce Development through partnerships with local educators, businesses, organizations and agencies. a. Stronger participation with the Monticello School District in growing their initiatives to bring businesses into the classrooms. b. Based on the need of the businesses, partner with key leaders of our local businesses, educators and others to develop and execute a Workforce Development Plan. c. Explore ways business can bring relevance to educational classes & programs. 4. Promote communications & engagement with Monticello businesses and prospects a. Create and host a Monticello business round table event which will offer businesses a platform for discussion. b. Facilitate "Industrial Round Tables". Objective: Creating Jobs & Expanding the Tax Base 1. Support the recruitment of business which further the goals and objectives for the community as guided by the Comprehensive Plan. a. Assess the current marketing materials and plan. b. Assist in execution or development of a new Marketing Plan. c. Respond in a timely manner to inbound communications. 2. Continue to lead the City in moving forward key transportation projects which support economic development. a. Participate in the "Business Day At the Capitol" through the Minnesota Chamber and lobby on behalf of the Monticello community to help City staff bring attention to our local transportation needs. b. Develop a needs based transportation priority statement for lobbying/support purposes. c. Encourage key transportation projects which improve product delivery for businesses, such as interchange, freeway, and bridge crossing projects. d. Identify specific benefits of a 3rd interchange to businesses and/or community. 3. Evaluate and provide recommendations to the City regarding industrial land supply and availability. a. More frequently evaluate current property inventory and uses for these properties as a group with the objective to better market these properties. b. Review and comment on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use update scheduled to occur in 2018 as it relates to industrial and commercial guided land in the City of Monticello. c. Assess Industrial Land availability for jobs with income levels to support families; 1. Total acreage with developed infrastructure, zoned, and available to purchase and the maximum acreage of a contiguous, buildable lot. 2. Total acreage with undeveloped infrastructure, zoned, and available to purchase. Owner contact information. 3. Total acreage preserved in Land Use Plan for future development. d. Assess accessibility to Interstate 94 and State Highway 25 and utility capabilities 4. Support community quality of life initiatives which enhance Monticello's objectives for high quality development across the land use spectrum, including residential, commercial, industrial and civic uses. a. Support and encourage the development of the Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park and recommend the development of a pathway connection to Monticello Businesses. b. Promote CentraCare Health Monticello to industrial businesses. c. Develop a visioning worksheet to get IEDC members views on residential, commercial and industrial needs and challenges to bring to light needed future planning and ordinance changes. d. Review and coordinate public and private actions with parks and trails. 5. Continue to provide recommendations in an advisory capacity on land use matters relating to industrial and economic development. a. Provide comments on the NW Monticello Interchange Land Use Study. b. Keep informed on the status of the Monticello Nuclear Plant as it relates to the NW Interchange Land Use Study. c. Sponsor networking individually and in small groups for input. 6. Facilitate regional development initiatives. a. Support the development and implementation of the Regional CEDS (Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy) Plan through strategy review and feedback and proposed project suggestions. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 2018 ANNUAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT WORK PLAN EDA Purpose: The EDA is charged with coordinating and administering the City of Monticello's economic development and redevelopment plans and programs. The EDA is also responsible for housing and housing redevelopment. EDA Work Plan Mission Statement: The EDA's work plan is adopted in support of achieving the goals of the Monticello Comprehensive Plan and the 2017/2018 City Strategic Plan. The EDA will be proactive by developing and undertaking actions for achievement of the Comprehensive Plan's Economic Development goals and will be reactive in responding to economic development opportunities as they arise in the most timely and effective manner possible. The EDA shall utilize the economic development strategies of the Comprehensive Plan, including the Downtown Small Area Plan as a guide for action. Comprehensive Plan Goals: Attracting & Retaining Jobs Expanding Tax Base Enhancing Downtown Facilitating Redevelopment Housing Choice for Life -Cycle EDA Objectives: 1. Continue to support redevelopment efforts for publicly -owned properties on Block 52. a. Focus on site control for targeted redevelopment area on the block b. Evaluate the opportunities for the future sale of properties on Block 52 and the value of engaging a partner to expedite redevelopment on Block 52. c. Support as needed the completion of transportation improvements as envisioned in the Downtown Small Area Study Plan. 2. Implement the recommendations of the Downtown Small Area Plan a. Support and advocate for improvements to the downtown as envisioned in the Small Area Plan b. Develop and support the appropriate policies, programs, and incentives that enable the type of development described in the Plan c. Continue to build a funding base for use in property acquisition and redevelopment efforts in targeted areas. d. Implement a facade improvement program for desired revitalization areas. e. Meet with downtown property owners individually to understand their situation in terms of willingness to sell, partner, price, etc. f. Support opportunities for park and trail development as consistent with the Downtown Small Area Plan. 3. Engage as a partner in other redevelopment and revitalization opportunities as they arise, actively encouraging redevelopment within the Downtown. a. Fund studies that provide policy and strategy framework for desired land uses/or projects in the downtown and for other programs. b. Continue discussion on use of tax reimbursement/abatement, including development of criteria. 4. Support new multi -family housing development through the use of financing tools such as excess TIF dollars in TIF 1-6, TIF 1-22 and per adopted Policy Statement for Available TIF Funds. a. Develop marketing packets illustrating financial tools and available sites. b. Dialogue with multi -family housing developers and inform them of available resources to support MF development. c. Sponsor a multi -family housing developer expo providing site and financial assistance information facilitating relationship building. 5. Market industrial development at the Monticello Business Center (Otter Creek Business Park) to a broad variety of prospects. a. As guided by the Comprehensive Plan, target the following prospect areas: i. Businesses which will be a supplier, customer or collaborative partner to existing businesses within the community. ii. Businesses which would benefit from Monticello's utility and communications infrastructure. iii. Work with the CentraCare Health System to ensure the retention and to promote the expansion of health care services in Monticello. b. Focus on prospects which serve or rely on the St. Cloud and Twin Cities markets. c. Actively participate/network with current businesses to help establish external relationships. 6. Market EDA incentive programs in a more proactive manner, both within the community and beyond, beginning with the education on these resources at the EDA level. a. Continue to foster external networking opportunities. b. Present existing and new incentive programs to smaller community groups, local banks, realtors, and local businesses. c. Develop and communicate a "complete" development package program which provides support and assistance to prospects and developers from inquiry to construction. d. Prepare a multi -format (print, digital) summary resource piece. e. Explore the opportunity to develop an incubator building or pre -designed building shell plans with contractors ready for development. 7. Actively (aggressively) market for sale for development the EDA -owned properties at Cedar Street and Outlot A. a. Identify types of businesses sought for specific properties and market to these sectors accordingly. b. Identify commercial properties which should be held for larger redevelopment potential. 8. Encourage more proactive lead development and response in all market segments to support a diversified tax base. a. Develop relationships with local realtors and banks. b. Explore agent/broker relationships; evaluate the opportunity to engage a development facilitator. c. Develop a list of target properties and share with realtors and bankers. d. Research and communicate state and federal incentive programs for bringing businesses into community. 9. Examine housing stock for aging or blighted properties and research development of programs for redevelopment and/or revitalization. a. Understand the state of the current housing stock/inventory and areas of need. b. Identify and prioritize potential programs, such as: i. Program for acquisition for redevelopment ii. Program for revitalization iii. Program to encourage new development in in -fill areas c. Utilize available housing TIF dollars per Policy Statements for Available TIF Funds d. Establish clear criteria for "blight" and "cluster areas" for focus of programs. e. Identify and communicate state and regional programs which could be leveraged to support identified properties; identify programs applicable to each property. 10. Support the development of an economic development brand and implement in economic development activities. a. Migrate website to City site for more thorough and current site maintenance. b. Work with Communications Manager to develop coordinated economic development marketing plan c. Build value in development resources. d. Market amenities (including technology and recreation) in a more coordinated way 11. Re-engage in business retention and expansion efforts. a. Continue to engage the IEDC as the primary partner and lead in a the Business Retention and Expansion Program. Appendix: Monticello Comprehensive Plan, 2008 — Economic Development IZESOLT-UTION UTI INC. 2005-125 RESCLUI`101110F C177Y OF MONTICELLO NER QUESTING DE&GNATT�OTN OF T11F, ECON'O'hoC BEVELO PKE INT A UTHO RITY A LG1-:'_'A1 : DEVELOP l 7'GRGPilQZA7'J ON PIVEAE-4S, The City of Monticelle" would like to better utilize the Small Cities federal funds, and, WSJ f�deral designation and guidelines forever; and, WMEREAS, the City of Monticello by resolution, can request ftom the Minnesota Department of' Employment and Economic Development (MNDEED), authorization to transfer Small Cities Development Program Economic Development Set -Aside fun„ . o to(LDO); and WHEREAS, The Monticello Economic Development Authority is interested in being designated as a non -entitlement area; and 11111, 11110131 Op''MI 'W I 111�qjliq�i 9=110 1 4 I Sior 111c Mir, 01 Tne XeGeral HUN, Lac 7cpaymcni 01 Aac lcucraj lunus Plus any J11WTU accrued, carned or paid thereon '711ty 37W City and, therefore authorize them to receive the repayments from the SCDP Stt-Aside Loan to and/or (a portion of the federal SCDP funds in the exis-ting Revolving Lowi 11und), I CERTIFY TF "T the above Resolution wm ted by the City Council of the City of Monticello on this 12th day c , DE= C emb e 1: 2005. __m Y.I_,2zlv \T� ritlNP Val! la Narne/Title January 3, 2006 011ie Koropchak-, Economic Development Director City Hall 505 Walnut Street, Suite I Monticello, MN 55362-8831 RE: Ix)cal Development Organization De-signatiOn Monticello Economic Development Authority Twin City Die Casting, Inc. Dear 011ie: I aiii in ruccipt of you:- Dec-vnibcr 14, 2005 letter and re-solutior, requestin- di,t Monticello H*wnornic Development Authority {EDA) 4e dc--;1rmitud an a I,00�d Development Orgam zation (I -DO) for die city of Monticello, The city's EDA is an entity authorized under State law to engage in community and economic development activities. As such, the Minnesota DepaPUTICut ()I' Employment and Economic Development lits deterinincd that the Niionticello EDA is a "non-profit organization sciving the continunity development needs of non -entitlement areas" and hereby designates the FDA as an LDO, As indicated in our telephone conversations, all federal rcgulations will apply only on the first use of the federal funds, by die 1, , DA. This information should be retained in the FDA lilt, fior arch new project. If you have qL1CSti()nS, please call me at 051-290-389S. Sincerely, Carol Pie,,,,,,1ey-()Ison Sr. loan Officer Business Finance Offico c.c: Rick Wolfstellei business and Community Development Department of Employment and Economic Development 1st National Bank Bullclind - 332 Plinuc4oLh St., Suite E200 - Saint Paid, PIN 55101-3.351 - US!, 651-297-1291 * 800-657.3858 - Fxx 651-296-8833 - Mrflfi): 651 -29G -3!X)0 4 urtrar.dcez'.statc.nr= .ifs An eiTurt opp,orkadly rwplov and mrice prorlder. q NIONTICCIA-0 December 14, 22005 Ms. Carol Pressley -Olson Senior Loan Offliccr Minnesota Department ol'EmplOVITICrit and Economic Development I" National Bank- Building "I Minnesota Street St. Paul. IM N 5.5 101 RE: CRAP -09-01 22-H-l"Y00 Dear Carol: The City ol'N'lonticello request that the Monticello Economic I)evelopment Authority he designated a Local Development Organization (LDO). The City desires to trunstcr $500.000 plus interest from the Citv's federal revolviiw loan fund to the LDO. Please find a copy of the Resolution that requests the NI N Department of Employment and E.conomic Development's approval I'Or the designation and transler of fiends. Also. attached 1', a copy ol7the amended N.-Ionticello Lconornic Development Authority BLIsiness Sl.ihsidv Criteria. please note page 7, Section V. 'I'lle (ItV of klolttiCel 10 understands that bv transfierriniz, these funds to an 1.1)0the City gives tip control over the funds and cannot recall the funds from the I.D0. Sincerely. CHN OF NIONTICEI-1-0 011ie Koropcllak* Fconornic Development Dircoor Auachrrictms ?.)-1-I _Y00HIc c: DA 1) - 99-0 1 -1 FDA File Nlt)rit ice Ilo City Itall. 505 WaIIIIII Street. suite 1. Mowicello, MN 55362-9831 -1763) 295-2711 -Fax: (763) 295-4404 0ifice ol'i . lublic Works. 4N Golf Course Rd., Monticello. NiN 55362 - (703.) 295-3170 - Fax: (763.) 271-3272 R'V-SOIJ 1 F04 )N N(,-). :Elft; --Ip, IMSM A AWN Of c VFY (ifli!NlICEJ A U ITH)l 1ENAING UESICA4 ATION OF THE NIOPITICKIJA vvw�wm D VVF I A) PN IFNI AUT I M 81111' A , � LOOM DWIT(WIMI M; %I I I At V A 'v tvvIntee 1 "I"o, hi:_' 0, Kf or WH ?. pw AM tip , IMIJ?"M It lAV Cih 01 MOWN WIVIAW bc.v Sat:. ,:!w CYN '(1 lit..... j..w WAIA: An; 'l":On 01 P'111"A'LAS' I;!,. 1i1• i If I I ":Cl If .1� I Ml. so—Wo :.hds n . L "A A gow /d"w" W 1 In wid L-coiionim IMOopircid A iichtwo in nomi,qud in bvNW tko a in q": w. JJJYMTIAA. Aw NOw6ullhi Woonk 1-Mvio1rpicni. Qiihw-i!ti jjijkl :Vjj lilt 1w A IIIc loVol AW Te iulwynnol oi &r nnd =1 pki. xo 0: [K!ii '.!W!V01: ATIO ORA BE ITRLSM, I'VP fly Ow (Vy WhiowdW &P Ow CTv hovk wqww"; '1111IM'd 11,)i!1 1 1)1%1-1) '10 11w Mot iccllu ( :), A':E;or7., :I:,,! I, tc'll 1jewhiplucot ( )I; :iii. OU 4 sci-ving IhW LIMMUMPIA MW CqMOU16 !KVdq OFlh,! Kly aiwL HwMow i0 11:1. 11M, dlt:' "-'(Tni' 1., AJ'i , ';11 I'l TO N C TTWV VIF CASTINGS MIMI polin; of K Wov! 1{'1)1' �rhk i!": Q cdmq, 11CV(donp I wi i 1uh! I I ("FIRITY I I 1.\T ?" A A C IWAvily "in Wicd hv:hu Olycow;. A, Cd at Mmw*. E MONTICELLO SMALL CITIES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SET- ASIDE REVOLVING LOAN FUND GUIDELINES I. PURPOSE: The City of Monticello ("City") has received a grant through the Community Development Block Grant Economic Development Set Aside (SCDP) program (the "Program") and the Minnesota Investment Fund, administered through the Department of Employment and Economic Development ("DEED"). The grant may be used to make loans to local businesses as described below. As the recipient of a grant through the Program, the City is authorized to keep all of the principal repayments and interest on the loans it makes. The City is required to use these funds to create a revolving loan fund ("RLF") and to establish policies and procedures for the RLF'']rb :'/ 1 : 1 _ 1:►Oc Revolving loan funds are to be used for business start-ups, expansions, and retention where jobs are created or retained. This may be accomplished by the following means: 1.) Creation or retention of permanent private -sector jobs in order to create above average economic growth; 2.) Stimulation or leverage of private investment to ensure economic renewal and competitiveness; 3.) Increase to the local tax base; 4.) Improvement of employment and economic opportunity for citizens in the region to create a reasonable standard of living; and 5.) Stimulation of productivity growth through improved manufacturing or new technologies. 111MMI [" I'll NOW1149 NO oil RUN RLF's may be used to provide assistance for infrastructure, loans, loan guarantees, interest buy -downs, and other forms of participation with private sources of financing. The RLF assistance can be for no more than one-half of the cost of the project. The RLF is subject to all of the state and federal CDBG requirements, as described in Exhibits A and B attached. IV. ELIGIBLE PROJECTS The grant or loan must be based on one or more of the following criteria: 1.) Creation of new jobs or retention of existing jobs; 2.) Increase in the tax base; 3.) Investment of public dollars inducing private investment; 4.) Excessive public infrastructure or improvement cost beyond the means of the affected community and private participants in the project; 5.) Higher wage levels to the community or added value to current workforce skills; 6.) Necessity of assistance to retain existing business; and 7.) Necessity of assistance to attract out-of-state business. The grant or loan cannot be made based solely on a finding that the conditions in clause 2.), 6.) or 7.) exist. A finding must be made that a condition in clause 1.), 3.), 4.), or 5.) also exists. V. ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES RLF's may be used for the following activities: 1.) Purchase of land 2.) Construction of a building or other improvements 3.) Renovation of an existing building to accommodate the business 4.) Construction of tenant improvements 5) Purchase of Capital Equipment 6.) Lease or purchase of an existing building 7.) Site improvements 8.) Public improvements and privately owned utilities 9.) Workforce Development including job training and placement: a.) Training low skilled, low-income persons for specific jobs for which they have been hired and which require skill levels beyond what they now have; b.) Training a pool of low-income prospective employees for specific jobs being created as a result of a CDBG-funded industrial expansion, where the employer agrees to give first consideration to filling the new positions with people from this pool; c.) Re-training existing employees of a business as part of a project which qualifies as retaining jobs. 10.) Microenterprise Assistance: RLF assistance can be provided to persons owning or developing a microenterprise, which is defined as a commercial enterprise that has 5 orf employees, one or more of whom owns the enterprise. )ft ewer employ rprise f VI. INELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES RLF assistance may not be used for the following: 1.) Operation or expansion of a casino. 2.) For a project related to a sports facility. "Sports facility" means a building that has a professional sports team as a principal tenant. 3.) General promotion of the community. 4.) Professional sports teams. 5.) Privately owned recreational facilities that serve a predominantly higher income clientele where the benefit to users clearly outweighs the benefit of jobs created or retained. 6.) Acquisition of land for which a specific use has not been identified (i.e. land banking) 7.) Assistance to a for-profit business that is, or its owner is, the subject of unresolved findings of noncompliance related to previous CDBG assistance. 8.) For relocation of an out of state business. 9.) New housing construction. 10.) Planning for economic development projects. 11.) Job training that is not part of a CDBG eligible economic development activity to create or retain permanent jobs. 12.) Working capital. VII. PUBLIC BENEFIT A project using RLF funds must show a minimum level of public benefit. The amount of the assistance must not exceed $50,000 per full-time equivalent, permanent job (created or retained). If the City finds, after a public hearing, that the primary purpose of the project is not job creation, this provision is not applicable. VIII. PROJECT COSTS AND FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS A. Acceptable Private Financing Methods: 1. Companion Direct Loan: The RLF is subordinate to the primary lender. 2. Participation Loan: The RLF participates in a portion of the loan. 3. Guarantee Loans: The RLF guarantees a portion of the bank loan. a. Interest rate cap is subject to City approval B. Terms and Conditions: Leveraging: Minimum 60 io, 6 % private/ Non-RLF, Maximum 30% RLF, Minimum 5%;I PJ C. Other: No penalty for prepayment of loan in whole or in part. 2. Extending a balloon payment will require a verification letter from two lending institutions stating the inability to refinance and is subject to by the EDA. 3. Monthly payments may be deferred for a determined period of time upon approval by the EDA. i. Failure to pay principal or interest when due may result in the loan being immediately called. In addition to any other amounts due on any loan, and without waiving any right of the EDA under any applicable documents, a late fee of $250 will be imposed on any borrower for any payment not received in full by the EDA within 30 calendar days of the date on which it is due. Furthermore, interest will continue to accrue on any amount due until the date on which it is paid to the EDA and all such interest will be due and payable at the same time as the amount on which it has accrued. 4. RLF Loans are not assumable. 5. The EDA will determine appropriate and applicable business equity requirements on a case by case analysis, utilizing normal lending guidelines, subject to the type of assistance. 6. Collateral may include: i. Liens on real property in project (mortgage deed). ii. Liens on real property in business (mortgage deed). iii. Liens on real property held personally (subject to EDA approval, homestead exempt). iv. Machinery and equipment liens (except equipment exempt from bankruptcy). v. Personal and/or corporate guarantees (requires unlimited personal guarantees). 7. An approved RLF loan shall be null and void if funds are not drawn upon or disbursed within 180 days from date of EDA approval. i. The 180 -day non-performance date can be extended up to an additional 120 days, upon approval by the EDA. ii. A written request must be received 30 days prior to expiration of the 180 -day non-performance date. 8. Legal fees are the responsibility of the RLF applicant. 9. Participating Lending Institutions: i. shall be determined by the RLF applicant ii. shall cooperate with the EDA and assist in carrying out the policies of the RLF as approved by the EDA. iii. Shall analyze the formal application and indicate to the EDA at the level at which the lending institution will participate in the finance package. 10. Loan Administration: i. City Staff shall collect applicable RLF payments ii. City Staff shall assure EDA compliance with all applicable terms and conditions of the approved loan. iii. All loan documents shall include the following: a) Definition of loan default, agreements regarding notification of default b) Copy of primary lenders documents c) Provisions allowing the EDA to inquire on the status of the primary loan IV. LOAN APPLICATION PROCEDURES The EDA desires to make the RLF loan application process as simple as possible. However, certain procedures must be followed prior to EDA consideration of a loan request. Information regarding the program and procedures for obtaining a loan are as follows: a. Citv Staff: City Staff shall carry out RLF operating procedures as approved by the EDA. Staff is responsible for assisting businesses in the loan application process and will work closely with applicants in developing the necessary information. b. Application Process: 1. Applicant shall complete a preliminary loan application. Staff will review application for consistency with the policies set forth in the Guidelines. 2. If applicant gains initial support from lending institution and if the preliminary loan application is approved, applicant is then asked to complete a formal application. Formal application shall include a business plan which will include its management structure, market analysis, and financial statement. Like documentation necessary for obtaining the bank loan associated with the proposal is acceptable. Attached with each formal application is a written release of information executed by the loan applicant 3. If the preliminary loan application is not approved by staff, the applicant may request that the EDA consider approval of the preliminary application at the next regularly scheduled meeting of the EDA. 4. City staff shall analyze the formal application and financial statements contained therein to determine if the proposed business and finance plan is viable. City staff shall submit a written recommendation to the EDA. A decision regarding the application shall be made by the EDA within 60 days of the submittal of a completed formal application. 5. Prior to issuance of an approved loan, the EDA Attorney shall review and/or prepare all contracts, legal documents, and inter -creditor agreements. After such review is complete, the EDA shall issue said loan. History: Public Hearing and Adoption on March 23, 2009 Revised Exhibit A STATE REQUIREMENTS State requirements are as on file with the City Clerk of Monticello and are hereby incorporated by reference. Exhibit B Federal requirements are as on file with the City Clerk of Monticello and are hereby incorporated by reference. E � E MONTICELLO MINNESOTA INVESTMENT FUND REVOLVING LOAN FUND GUIDELINES I. PURPOSE: The City of Monticello ("City") has received a grant through the Minnesota Investment Fund, administered through the Department of Employment and Economic Development ("DEED"). The grant may be used to make loans to local businesses as described below. As the recipient of a grant through the Program, the City is authorized to keep all of the principal repayments and interest on the loans it makes. The City is required to use these funds to create a revolving loan fund ("RLF") and to establish policies and procedures for the RLF. II. PURPOSE OF THE REVOLVING LOAN FUND Revolving loan funds are to be used for business start-ups, expansions, and retention where jobs are created or retained. This may be accomplished by the following means: 1.) Creation or retention of permanent private -sector jobs in order to create above average economic growth; 2.) Investment in technology or equipment that increases productivity and provides for higher wages; 3.) Leverage of private investment to ensure economic renewal and competitiveness; 4.) Increase to the local tax base and diversify industry -business mix; 5.) Improve the quality of existing jobs, based on increases in wages or improvements in job duties, training or education associated with those jobs; 6.) Improvement of employment and economic opportunity for citizens in the region to create a reasonable standard of living; and 7.) Stimulation of productivity growth through improved manufacturing or new technologies. 1111!111f["I'll11 W114911►`1oil111IRx.� RLF's may be used to provide assistance for infrastructure, loans, loan guarantees, interest buy -downs, and other forms of participation with private sources of financing. The RLF assistance can be for no more than one-half of the cost of the project. The RLF is subject to State requirements, as described in Exhibit A. IV. ELIGIBLE PROJECTS The grant or loan must be based on one or more of the following criteria: 1.) Creation of new jobs or retention of existing jobs; 2.) Increase in the tax base; 3.) Investment of public dollars inducing private investment; 4.) Excessive public infrastructure or improvement cost beyond the means of the affected community and private participants in the project; 5.) Higher wage levels to the community or added value to current workforce skills; 6.) Necessity of assistance to retain existing business; and 7.) Necessity of assistance to attract out-of-state business. The grant or loan cannot be made based solely on a finding that the conditions in clause 2.), 6.) or 7.) exist. A finding must be made that a condition in clause 1.), 3.), 4.), or 5.) also exists. V. ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES RLF's may be used for the following activities: 1.) Purchase of land 2.) Construction of a building or other improvements 3.) Renovation of an existing building to accommodate the business 4.) Construction of tenant improvements 5) Purchase of Capital Equipment 6.) Purchase of an existing building 7.) Site improvements 8.) Public improvements and privately owned utilities 10.) Workforce training activities 11.) Working capital VI. INELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES RLF assistance may not be used for the following: 1.) Operation or expansion of a casino. 2.) For a project related to a sports facility. "Sports facility" means a building that has a professional sports team as a principal tenant. 3.) General promotion of the community. 4.) Professional sports teams. 5.) Privately owned recreational facilities that serve a predominantly higher income clientele where the benefit to users clearly outweighs the benefit of jobs created or retained. 6.) Acquisition of land for which a specific use has not been identified (i.e. land banking) 7.) Assistance to a for-profit business that is, or its owner is, the subject of unresolved findings of noncompliance related to previous MIF assistance. VII. WAGE GOALS A project receiving assistance from MIF RLF dollars must pay each employee in the organization total compensation, including benefits not mandated by law, that on an annualized basis is equal to at least 110 percent of the federal poverty level for a family of four. Each year's compensation level requirements can be found on DEED's Business Finance MIF website. VIII. PROJECT COSTS AND FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS A. Acceptable Private Financing Methods: 1. Companion Direct Loan: The RLF is subordinate to the primary lender. 2. Participation Loan: The RLF participates in a portion of the loan. 3. Guarantee Loans: The RLF guarantees a portion of the bank loan. a. Interest rate cap is subject to EDA approval B. Terms and Conditions: 1. Leveraging: Minimum 60 045% private/Non-RLF, Maximum 30% RLF, Minimum �'l N:' . Loan Term Personal property term not to exceed life of equipment � 0'$''S' 3. Interest Rate: Fixed rate not less than 2% below prime for loans that are structured with a 10 percent equity contribution or I% below prime rate for loans that have less than 10 percent equity injection - as published in the Wall Street Journal on the date of RLF loan approval, with a minimum interest rate of 2.0%. 4. Loan Fee: Minimum of $500 but not to exceed 1.5% of the total loan. Fees are to be documented and no duplication of fees between the lending institution and the RLF. Loan fee may be incorporated into project cost. The EDA retains the right to reduce or waive loan fee or portion of loan fee. Fee to be paid by applicant to the EDA within 5 working days after EDA approval of RLF loan. The fee is non-refundable. C. Other: No penalty for prepayment of loan in whole or in part. 2. Extending a balloon payment will require a verification letter from two lending institutions stating the inability to refinance and is subject to approval by the EDA. Monthly payments may be deferred for a determined period of time upon approval by the EDA. Failure to pay principal or interest when due may result in the loan being immediately called. In addition to any other amounts due on any loan, and without waiving any right of the EDA under any applicable documents, a late fee of $250 will be imposed on any borrower for any payment not received in full by the EDA within 30 calendar days of the date on which it is due. Furthermore, interest will continue to accrue on any amount due until the date on which it is paid to the EDA, and all such interest will be due and payable at the same time as the amount on which it has accrued. 3. RLF Loans are not assumable. 4. The EDA will determine appropriate and applicable business equity requirements on a case by case analysis, utilizing normal lending guidelines, subject to the type of assistance. 5. Collateral may include: i. Liens on real property in project (mortgage deed). ii. Liens on real property in business (mortgage deed). iii. Liens on real property held personally (subject to EDA approval, homestead exempt). iv. Machinery and equipment liens (except equipment exempt fiom bankruptcy). v. Personal and/or corporate guarantees (requires unlimited personal guarantees). 6. An approved RLF loan shall be null and void if funds are not drawn upon or disbursed within 180 days from date of EDA approval. i. The 180 -day non-performance date can be extended up to an additional 120 days, upon approval by the EDA. ii. A written request must be received 30 days prior to expiration of the 180 -day non-performance date. 7. Legal fees are the responsibility of the RLF applicant. Participating Lending Institutions: i. shall be determined by the RLF applicant ii. shall cooperate with the EDA and assist in carrying out the policies of the RLF as approved by the EDA. iii. Shall analyze the formal application and indicate, to the EDA, the level at which the lending institution will participate in the finance package. 9. Loan Administration: i. City Staff shall collect applicable RLF payments ii. City Staff shall assure EDA compliance with all applicable terms and conditions of the approved loan. iii. All loan documents shall include the following: a) Definition of loan default, agreements regarding notification of default b) Copy of primary lenders documents c) Provisions allowing the EDA to inquire on the status of the primary loan IV. LOAN APPLICATION PROCEDURES The EDA desires to make the RLF loan application process as simple as possible. However, certain procedures must be followed prior to EDA consideration of a loan request. Information regarding the program and procedures for obtaining a loan are as follows: a. Citv Staff. City Staff shall carry out RLF operating procedures as approved by the EDA. Staff is responsible for assisting businesses in the loan application process and will work closely with applicants in developing the necessary information. b. Application Process: 1. Applicant shall complete a preliminary loan application. Staff will review application for consistency with the policies set forth in the Guidelines. 2. If applicant gains initial support from lending institution and if the preliminary loan application is approved, applicant is then asked to complete a formal application. Formal application shall include a business plan which will include its management structure, market analysis, and financial statement. Like documentation necessary for obtaining the bank loan associated with the proposal is acceptable. Attached with each formal application is a written release of information executed by the loan applicant 3. If the preliminary loan application is not approved by staff, the applicant may request that the EDA consider approval of the preliminary application at the next regularly scheduled meeting of the EDA. 4. City staff shall analyze the formal application and financial statements contained therein to determine if the proposed business and finance plan is viable. City staff shall submit a written recommendation to the EDA. A decision regarding the application shall be made by the EDA within 60 days of the submittal of a completed formal application. 5. Prior to issuance of an approved loan, the EDA Attorney shall review and/or prepare all contracts, legal documents, and inter -creditor agreements. After such review is complete, the EDA shall issue said loan. History: Public Hearing and Adoption on March 23, 2009 Revised Exhibit A STATE REQUIREMENTS State requirements are as on file with the City Clerk of Monticello and are hereby incorporated by reference. LIMAN Transactions December 2017, the DMV processed 6,003 transactions 314 more than December 2016. DMV year -to date revenue is $594,188.38 an increase of $32,828.26 or 5/8% over the same period last year. Please see the following graphs for more detail. $50,000 $45,000 $40,000 $35,000 $30,000 $25,000 $20,000 $15,000 $10,000 $5,000 DMV Revenue Comparison $44,803 Dec 2011 Dec 2012 Dec 2013 Dec 2014 Dec 2015 Dec 2016 Dec 2017 DMV Transaction Comparison 7,000 5,974 6,003 6,000 4,973 4,998 5'5�? 5,000 531,118 $ $561,366 4,000 4,005 $458,948 $456,178 N:i 6 '15 g1l $465,217 3,000 .0 15, 2000 9 W,, $200,000 R M.. ..... . .. 1,000 .. . ... . 1155 A $100,000 Dec 2011 Dec 2012 Dec 2013 Dec 2014 Dec 2015 Dec 2016 Dec 2017 DMV Year -to -Date Revenue Comparison $700,000 $594,188 $600,000 531,118 $ $561,366 $500,000 $458,948 $456,178 $497,493 $400,000 $465,217 15, $300,000 M $200,000 $100,000 Dec 2011 Dec 2012 Dec 2013 Dec 2014 Dec 2015 Dec 2016 Dec 2017 DMV Year -to -Date Transaction Comparison 90,000 75,891 78,515 80,000 72,135 70,000 67,462 bZ,999 62,420 "M w. 58,257 60,000 50,000 "p low 40,000 V 30,000.,". 20,000 P, 10,000 '4' V% M , Dec 2011 Dec 2012 Dec 2013 Dec 2014 Dec 2015 Dec 2016 Dec 2017 r CITE' OF Mo4i�effq HI -WAY LIQUORS Sales through December 31, 2017 Attached is the data for total sales in each major category through the end of December 2017. Hi -Way Liquors Sales Report 12/31/2017 Total Sales A HR 2015 Month 2008 2009 2010 2011 Jan $ 249,670.43 $ 316,280.10 $ 300,631.85 $ 296,838.64 Feb 255,440.36 284,988.38 285,584.50 315,239.00 Mar 295,257.14 318,050.39 324,062.21 335,032.60 Apr 281,365.81 346,738.34 369,112.88 389,543.24 May 377,177.10 384,337.08 399,489.67 409,309.12 Jun 350,727.93 381,782.23 377,458.15 409,726.07 Jul 409,870.50 430,838.23 466,122.69 466,738.15 Aug 409,575.96 383,523.07 386,245.30 408,734.83 Sep 317,846.07 346,900.80 346,557.62 373,719.64 Oct 351,268.98 360,742.04 375,367.40 365,702.14 Nov 332,605.88 341,875.49 360,661.96 376,855.40 Dec 436,379.03 454,982.63 485,617.01 505,482.70 Total $4,067,185.19 $4,351,038.78 $4,476,911.24 $4,652,921.53 Change $ 283,853.59 $ 125,872.46 $ 176,010.29 Change % 7.0% 2.9% 3.9% 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 CYM-LYM Y -T -D $ 302,114.52 $ 328,004.13 $ 355,029.76 $ 380,425.45 $ 364,675.32 $ 356,295.18 -2.3% -2.3% 307,385.41 337,923.99 333,487.18 347,777.77 362,746.98 364,836.39 0.6% -0.9% 388,195.21 408,071.17 377,391.62 388,003.16 401,256.91 417,005.50 3.9% 0.8% 347,321.09 388,395.50 389,250.82 421,280.89 428,729.44 448,141.63 4.5% 1.9% 433,829.01 436,195.21 498,095.67 523,401.05 482,917.95 503,867.81 4.3% 2.4% 461,423.68 440,255.04 426,392.73 474,203.81 470,585.33 521,559.76 10.8% 4.0% 447,452.18 485,459.76 479,174.06 542,973.27 527,519.46 563,935.31 6.9% 4.5% 445,158.94 503,181.84 484,955.71 470,505.22 462,669.36 497,201.21 7.5% 4.9% 390,399.33 379,381.19 397,495.82 439,444.29 448,218.93 501,126.67 11.8% 5.7% 372,676.23 396,328.87 409,967.74 460,096.82 454,442.30 461,549.38 1.6% 5.3% 421,960.12 424,038.37 465,299.53 474,241.74 444,533.08 495,519.24 11.5% 5.8% 527,865.36 518,379.58 549,200.76 569,707.38 605,509.16 629,143.57 3.9% 5.6% $4,845,781.08 $5,045,614.65 $5,165,741.40 $5,492,060.85 $ 5,453,804.22 $ 5,760,181.65 $ 192,859.55 $ 199,833.57 $ 120,126.75 $ 326,319.45 $ (38,256.63) $ 306,377.43 4.1% 4.1% 2.4% 6.3% -0.7% 5.6% Monthly Hi -Way Sales * 2008 * 2009 2010 1 02011 A HR 2015 Jul Aug Sep * 2008 * 2009 2010 1 02011 2015 2016 02017 Oct Nov Dec Hi -Way Liquors Sales Report 12/31/2017 Beer Month 2008 2009 2010 2011 Jan $ 122,218.36 $ 157,849.78 $ 146,246.32 $250,000 $ 143,906.08 Feb 121,734.33 137,055.23 140,624.54 m2011 150,075.08 Mar 138,889.05 155,196.13 164,157.70 163,595.55 $150,000 Apr 146,613.65 178,834.20 189,978.23 $100,000 194,504.16 May 201,232.14 210,097.48 $50,000 223,678.47 208,963.65 Jun 193,801.97 207,793.83 206,043.42 224,769.03 2016 Jul 226,317.96 229,199.79 260,971.50 258,734.60 Aug 226,653.65 E2017 203,222.86 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul 211,996.32 Dec 216,546.53 Sep 166,679.60 183,586.32 183,865.70 199,170.24 Oct 176,382.34 179,873.10 190,893.27 180,043.06 Nov 158,322.50 154,584.13 168,265.14 171,866.27 Dec 187,691.06 190,655.19 203,080.13 216,560.71 Total $2,066,536.61 $2,187,948.04 $2,289,800.74 $2,328,734.96 Change $ 121,411.43 $ 101,852.70 $ 38,934.22 Change % 5.9% 4.7% 1.7% 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 CYM-LYM Y -T -D $ 149,406.45 $ 160,903.32 $ 173,814.13 $ 191,370.26 $ 176,483.68 $ 174,846.99 -0.9% -0.9% 150,589.28 162,865.75 161,168.63 164,508.11 175,055.27 179,346.12 2.5% 0.8% 203,957.25 192,607.52 185,325.68 192,955.79 199,141.66 208,926.70 4.9% 2.3% 179,486.77 186,134.31 198,195.77 219,756.39 228,133.10 234,069.51 2.6% 2.4% 227,664.73 234,738.30 256,188.77 259,306.91 250,403.11 262,275.25 4.7% 2.9% 259,671.21 243,389.79 238,322.11 263,421.95 263,264.15 296,531.85 12.6% 4.9% 253,648.64 273,319.54 265,555.32 301,867.65 296,513.68 315,848.83 6.5% 5.2% 242,179.20 281,577.25 267,802.95 253,141.21 250,255.41 268,173.42 7.2% 5.5% 208,974.88 202,213.80 211,854.94 233,215.56 238,333.55 270,898.13 13.7% 6.4% 187,386.57 191,764.20 210,454.13 234,882.09 224,253.93 228,484.62 1.9% 6.0% 195,276.37 192,162.71 202,081.91 207,055.40 213,333.23 222,993.99 4.5% 5.9% 224,952.83 217,491.21 234,178.12 241,996.27 253,223.11 271,457.72 7.2% 6.0% $2,483,194.18 $2,539,167.70 $2,604,942.46 $2,763,477.59 $ 2,768,393.88 $ 2,933,853.13 $ 154,459.22 $ 55,973.52 $ 65,774.76 $ 158,535.13 $ 4,916.29 $ 165,459.25 6.6% 2.3% 2.6% 6.1% 0.2% 6.0% Monthly Beer Sales $350,000 w 2008 $300,000 m2009 $250,000 6vi 2010 m2011 $200,000 2012 $150,000 2013 $100,000 2014 $50,000 2015 2016 E2017 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Hi -Way Liquors Sales Report 12/31/2017 Liquor Month 2008 2009 2010 2011 $200,000 2012 2013 2014 2015 $150,000 2016 2017 Jan $ 73,930.87 2012 $ 92,370.42 $ 91,472.50 2013 $ 91,279.01 $ 93,085.69 2014 $ 103,977.89 $ 113,943.25 i, $ 118,577.85 $ 118,211.20 $ 114,509.99 2016 Feb 74,261.89 83,513.27 E 2017 85,484.92 Jul Aug Sep Oct 96,541.21 92,489.93 106,387.16 107,609.55 112,198.85 113,060.59 117,361.15 Mar 78,870.42 88,569.65 93,133.42 101,047.04 112,244.43 124,487.55 116,316.49 118,269.49 118,839.79 131,238.09 Apr 76,735.80 90,627.19 95,025.54 110,898.81 98,080.67 113,594.37 115,579.47 123,841.34 126,073.89 130,114.53 May 103,409.29 102,041.75 106,395.62 111,586.59 114,299.35 127,622.31 135,370.38 140,116.66 129,009.36 142,237.28 Jun 91,805.81 103,580.02 102,086.20 115,136.72 128,604.32 124,019.90 120,291.71 136,716.81 135,763.26 147,813.59 Jul 105,782.85 118,883.98 122,861.98 130,624.19 123,672.73 139,270.04 139,967.77 155,436.54 150,173.35 160,220.37 Aug 106,489.25 103,977.01 101,487.43 113,869.37 126,065.14 141,197.73 138,660.76 136,440.40 135,841.14 144,263.78 Sep 88,448.34 94,335.50 94,528.17 103,373.64 109,153.56 107,605.71 115,119.19 129,195.42 130,101.01 143,252.37 Oct 97,046.60 102,236.90 102,983.14 103,533.14 106,326.73 116,677.74 124,271.15 140,198.97 128,290.50 145,864.34 Nov 97,348.39 90,996.73 102,298.02 105,501.75 120,127.29 126,412.24 134,241.85 132,261.11 134,208.12 149,468.96 Dec 135,221.23 143,684.12 153,690.60 159,717.50 172,370.96 175,523.36 184,746.26 190,944.24 205,335.83 213,217.73 Total $1,129,350.74 $1,214,816.54 $1,251,447.54 $1,343,108.97 $1,396,520.80 $1,506,776.00 $1,546,117.83 $1,634,197.68 $ 1,624,908.04 $ 1,739,562.18 Change $ 85,465.80 $ 36,631.00 $ 91,661.43 $ 53,411.82 $ 110,255.21 $ 39,341.83 $ 88,079.85 $ (9,289.64) $ 114,654.14 Change % 7.6% 3.0% 7.3% 4.0% 7.9% 2.6% 5.7% -0.6% 7.1% Monthly Liquor Sales $250,000 m 2008 $200,000 m 2009 2010 $150,000 &2011 2012 $100,000 2013 2014 $50,000 i, 2015 2016 E 2017 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec CYM-LYM Y -T -D -3.1% -3.1% 3.8% 0.3% 10.4% 3.7% 3.2% 3.6% 10.3% 5.0% 8.9% 5.7% 6.7% 5.9% 6.2% 5.9% 10.1% 6.4% 13.7% 7.1% 11.4% 7.5% 3.8% 7.1% Hi -Way Liquors Sales Report 12/31/2017 Wine Month 2008 2009 2010 2011 $120,000 - ---------------------------------- 2012 2013 2014 2015 $100,000 2016 2017 Jan $ 30,700.42 w2011 $ 41,810.19 $ 43,324.18 $ 48,437.59 $ 50,238.83 2012 $ 54,949.83 $ 59,391.16 2013 $ 61,128.65 $ 60,454.56 $ 57,275.16 Feb 33,407.17 39,410.85 42,230.84 52,847.05 $20,000 54,642.27 60,573.12 57,228.51 62,600.47 64,797.38 58,664.45 Mar 47,603.93 45,525.38 2016 46,165.18 54,639.16 4. 57,735.22 77,810.58 66,425.24 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun 67,121.51 Dec 71,840.82 64,286.75 Apr 31,755.42 48,303.48 61,146.04 62,289.18 57,973.74 79,736.19 63,101.05 63,285.56 61,268.24 69,415.79 May 38,522.75 40,963.86 45,733.08 68,701.95 78,740.40 62,491.07 92,083.62 109,512.94 87,333.35 82,724.29 Jun 31,796.95 37,522.00 44,211.14 49,089.65 56,607.74 59,523.15 54,270.56 59,036.14 54,889.39 58,623.08 Jul 36,909.44 41,813.65 48,334.93 49,664.45 54,467.20 57,115.44 57,743.98 66,029.11 60,750.62 64,034.24 Aug 35,932.62 41,333.00 46,871.28 53,172.68 61,825.30 64,057.61 62,446.04 63,546.01 60,015.78 66,304.12 Sep 33,830.69 39,798.20 47,859.52 53,916.37 60,317.17 59,121.12 59,409.30 62,210.27 65,294.31 68,220.79 Oct 45,750.04 48,422.79 58,081.87 60,949.40 66,423.82 75,606.28 63,659.41 70,038.32 89,005.29 70,516.61 Nov 50,106.64 66,331.86 71,928.30 85,933.28 97,249.52 96,824.40 117,402.23 122,947.90 83,896.45 109,969.88 Dec 75,866.80 84,285.84 101,676.19 109,267.01 116,610.70 113,008.24 115,617.50 120,274.96 129,536.28 124,115.79 Total $ 492,182.87 $ 575,521.10 $ 657,562.55 $ 748,907.77 $ 812,831.91 $ 860,817.03 $ 868,778.60 $ 927,731.84 $ 889,082.47 $ 894,150.95 Change $ 83,338.23 $ 82,041.45 $ 91,345.22 $ 63,924.14 $ 47,985.12 $ 7,961.57 $ 58,953.24 $ (38,649.37) $ 5,068.48 Change % 16.9% 14.3% 13.9% 8.5% 5.9% 0.9% 6.8% -4.2% 0.6% Monthly Wine Sales $140,000 m 2008 $120,000 - ---------------------------------- ---------------- w2009 $100,000 2010 w2011 $80,000 2012 $60,000 2013 $40,000,; 2014 2015 $20,000 2016 4. E2017 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec CYM-LYM Y -T -D -5.3% -5.3% -9.5% -7.4% -10.5% -8.6% 13.3% -3.4% -5.3% -3.9% 6.8% -2.4% 5.4% -1.4% 10.5% 0.0% 4.5% 0.5% -20.8% -2.3% 31.1% 1.4% -4.2% 0.6% Liquor Store Sales - Rolling 12 Month Periods $6.0 I Sunday Hi -Way Sales $45 $40 $35 $30 $25 $20 $15 $10 $5 $0 --j -Ij -j a 00 ca 00 C* w w w w 0 0 0 0 0 NJ ria�Ij F- NJ wa) 0 w �Ij 0 rIj w -- 0 �Q -- -- 00 -- -- -- rIj -- n w -- r -- NJ -- w -- -- tIj -- NJ-- NJ �Ij �Ij � rIj NJ rQ CD -- rIj r1i NJ a -- Ln NJ vD m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r.r rQ 0 tv 0 is t3 rQ C tIj 0 rlr 0 0 N hIj r") ra CITY OF i�effq MONTICELLO COMMUNITY CENTER (MCC) Transactions and visits Year to date (12.31.17), the MCC processed 91,367 transactions compared to 107,116 last year. The MCC year to date revenue is $1,764,903, a decrease of $21,925 from the same time last year. Year to date membership visits are 134,220 compared to 137,430 last year and MCC memberships are at a total of 5,859 active members compared to 4,558 at this time last year. YTD Ti ansactions YTD Member Visits 2015 2016 2017 7000 6000 5000 4000 gOoO 2000 1000 MCC 12/31 YTD Revenue 2015 r2016 ;�2017 MCC 12/31 Memberships 2015 c 3016 !'2Oz7 Council Connection -0V22/ 0 r CITE' OF Mo4i�eflo RECEPTION/CITIZEN SERVICES Help Desk Summary for 2017 The Help Desk on the city website provides a convenient option for citizens to communicate with city offices and for city staff to address questions and concerns, all while providing opportunities to track the data. Help Desk users have the option to originate inquiries directly to City Hall, Public Works, or DMV. In 2017 reception services and communications staff partnered to make minor changes to the Help Desk with the intent of tracking data more effectively as well as making the service easier for citizens to use. As a result, there are some categories of data that do not have corresponding information from 2016. Overall, the use of the Help Desk rose in 2017; there were 557 inquiries last year compared to 379 in 2016. The largest increases in inquiries were for utility billing and the building department. Staff expected the increase in questions about utility billing given the change to the monthly billing cycle. The increase for the building department, based on the content of the inquiries, is in part due to the fact that more people are using the website to submit permits and rental license applications as well as an increase in construction. Finally, please note that the "other' category includes topics such as social concerns, visitor information, and general community services in Monticello. There is a decrease in the number of inquiries in this category for 2017 since the data was categorized differently last year. The following topics were the most frequently received in 2016 and 2017: 2016 # of 2017 # of Concern Topics Concerns Concerns Animal Control 44 42 Blight/Nuisance 25 29 Building Pen -nit Application 46 Building & Rental Ordinance Inquiries 46 Engineering 11 19 Events 20 13 Council Connection - 01/22/18 Fire Department 13 Liquor/Massage Therapy/Business License 18 Misc. Land Use/Zoning Inquiries 40 Other 27 9 Permanent Sign Permit Applications & Inquiries 16 Public Works — Parks/Streets/Water 97 Rental License Applications 21 Water/Sewer/Garbage Utility Bill Inquiries 48 87 Website 9 16 Attached are graph summaries of inquiries for 2017. w 70 m 50 m 91 20 m m Citizen Service Desk Inquiries 2016 vs. 2017 ov� gzT . ... . ..... ifNr '14 �&q)' Jan Feb Mar Apr May ov� gzT ifNr '14 4 4, V Jun Rd Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2016 2017 ' -,94 West Corridor Coalition Legislative Preview Breakfast When The 1-94West Corridor Coalition would like toextend an Friday, February 1G.2O18from invitation toattend our Legislative Preview event. 8:00AMho9:30AM CST Add boCalendar This annual event allows for coalition supporters todirectly engage with transportation leaders, hear legislators' perspectives, and learn about the |-Q4West Corridor Coalition's Where priorities. Rogers Community Center �12U1 Memorial Drive W e expehencedm��Vrsuccess over the past years with the F(o K4N553�4 ��n� opening ofadditional lanes between Highway 1Oi in Rogers and Highway 241 inSt. Michael, which included o55Y6 � reduction intotal travel time and the completion ofnearly 3 - million square feet ofindustrial development inthe region. VVe � hope tocontinue making lane capacity expansion = � improvements ��|oudand complete the Brockhon/G1D L�J Interchange vvithyour help and the help ofour ouppo�ena. Rc�� sz 2O18will baanexciting year for the Coalition! During the 2O17 legislative session, the legislature added anadditional $3OO million intrunk highway bonds spread over four years and $25 F|Mch»- . � million per year in oeoh to the Corridors of Commerce program, |nresponse, MnD[)Tdecided toselect $40Qmillion ofprojects inthe next round ofCorridors ofCommerce funding. The 1-94 Qrivinq Directions West Corridor Coalition intends tosubmit our eligible priority projects, the |-Q4capacity expansion from St. Michael tm Albertville, G1OInterchange and Brockton Interchange, for the Corridors ofCommerce funding selection which vvuu|d greatly increase capacity and reduce congestion along the |'94 Corridor. We are hoping that you are able tojoin usfor our Legislative Preview event. 194 West Corridor Coalition, PO Box 95, Rogers, MN 553-74 5aheUnsubscribe" chadotte,oab!er(d�d.monbceUo,mnus Forward email I Uodate Profile I About our service orovider Sent bykimocOve|ocitvoub|ioaffairs.com incollaboration with City Council Agenda: 01/22/18 2J. Consideration of adopting Resolution #2018-02 accepting the Feasibility Report and setting a public hearing on February 12, 2018 for the Chelsea Road Utility and Street Improvements, Citv Prosect No. 17C001 (SB) The City Council authorized preparation of a Feasibility Report addressing street, trail, sidewalk and utility improvements along Chelsea Road between TH 25 and Fallon Avenue. The segment of Chelsea Road between Edmonson Avenue and west of Fallon Avenue has deteriorated over time and is the last segment of Chelsea Road that has roadside ditches in lieu of curb and gutter with storm sewer. Based on the existing roadway conditions and geotechnical analysis of soil borings obtained in 2017, it is recommended to complete a full -depth pavement reclamation with new bituminous pavement placed along the approximate 1,875 -foot length of Chelsea Road between Edmonson Avenue and Fallon Avenue. It is proposed to widen the road section to 44 feet, add curb and gutter, and construct a stormwater collection system. It is proposed to place a nova chip seal, which is also referred to as ultra-thin bonded wearing course, along Chelsea Road from TH 25 to Edmonson Avenue. It is proposed to change the intersection traffic control at Chelsea Road and Cedar Street to a four-way stop with the installation of stop signs, based on the 2017 traffic warrant analysis performed. It is recommended to monitor traffic conditions after the Fallon Avenue overpass is completed, specifically the eastbound Chelsea Road approach back- up to TH 25. Should this become an issue, installation of a traffic signal and separate right -turn lanes for eastbound and westbound Chelsea Road and northbound Cedar Street should be considered. Based on projected growth rates, it is anticipated that the traffic signal will be needed in 2024; however, it will depend on the growth in the immediate area as well. A roundabout was considered at this intersection; however, because of the unbalanced traffic volumes of each street approach, a traffic signal is recommended as a more feasible alternative to improve traffic operations. Proposed pathway improvements include extending a bituminous trail on the north side of Chelsea Road between Fallon Avenue and Edmonson Avenue and a concrete sidewalk along the south side between Fallon Avenue and Cedar Street. These pathway extensions would complete system gap connections and provide pedestrian facilities on both sides of Chelsea Road to limit crossings. This is the recommendation on collector roadways according to the City's proposed pathway connections guide map. Boulevard tree planting installation along the corridor is proposed with the project. Dual forcernains are proposed to continue to extend along the Chelsea Road boulevard from Cedar Street to the trunk sanitary sewer main just west of Fallon Avenue. This forcemain system, which extends from the Otter Creek lift station, was previously identified in 2005 to address future development in the City's northwest area with the City Council Agenda: 01/22/18 former Heritage/Silver Springs development and was re-evaluated with current land use plans. It is timely to construct the forcemains with this project based on projected growth and to limit construction impacts to one year. Property owners along Chelsea Road were invited to an informational meeting on January 11, 2018 to discuss the project scope and special assessments. Representatives from Aroplax, Midwest Precision Machining and Red Rooster Properties were present. Discussions via phone also took place with Tapper's Holdings, Inc. and Wesley Sprunk. The primary comment was related to questioning the need for sidewalk and trail facilities proposed along Chelsea Road. Al. Budget Impact: The estimated costs for the improvements total $2,731,790, which include a 10% contingency and 22% for legal, engineering, administrative, and financing costs. Special assessments to the benefitting adjacent property owners are proposed for street, storm sewer, trail and sidewalk improvements per the City's assessment policy Funding sources for the proposed improvements include special assessments in order to reimburse a portion of a future bond issue or use of reserves, capital improvement funds, and advancement of State Aid funds to finance the project. A separate agenda item related to advancement of State Aid funds will be forthcoming for Council consideration. A2. Staff Workload Impact: City staff will prepare the necessary documents for the public hearing in accordance with state statutes. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 10 Assessments City Funds Total Street Reconstruction (Edmonson Avenue to Fallon $388,815 $591,371 $980,186 Avenue) Nova Chip Scal _ $117,412 $117,412 (TH25 to Edmonson Avenue) Sidewalk Improvements $83,922 $84,190 $168,112 Trail Improvements $36,922 $63,205 $100,127 Forcemain Improvements - $999,757 $999,757 Storm Sewer Improvements $223,082 $143,114 $366,196 TOTAL $732,741 $1,985,984 $2,731,790 Special assessments to the benefitting adjacent property owners are proposed for street, storm sewer, trail and sidewalk improvements per the City's assessment policy Funding sources for the proposed improvements include special assessments in order to reimburse a portion of a future bond issue or use of reserves, capital improvement funds, and advancement of State Aid funds to finance the project. A separate agenda item related to advancement of State Aid funds will be forthcoming for Council consideration. A2. Staff Workload Impact: City staff will prepare the necessary documents for the public hearing in accordance with state statutes. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 10 City Council Agenda: 01/22/18 1. Motion to adopt Resolution #2018-02 accepting the Feasibility Report and setting a public hearing on February 12, 2018 for Chelsea Road Utility and Street Improvements, City Project No. 17C001 2. Motion to deny adoption of Resolution #2018-02 at this time. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends approving Alternative #1. Chelsea Road has deteriorated over time, is in need of repair and was included in the City's Capital Improvement Plan. It is timely to consider moving forward with these improvements at the same time as the Fallon Avenue overpass project in order to limit major construction and traffic impacts to the year 2018. W01 ta I 109A� . A. Resolution #2018-02 B. Feasibility Report CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2018-02 ACCEPTING THE FEASIBILITY REPORT AND CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE CHELSEA ROAD UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS, CITY PROJECT NO. 17CO01 WHEREAS, a Feasibility Report has been prepared by the City Engineer for the Chelsea Road Utility and Street improvements, City Project No. 17COOl which include: reconstruction of streets listed including the adjustment, construction, reclamation, removal, and/or repair of existing pavenzent; curb and gutter; sanitary sewer, stornz sewer and water supply systems; pathways; sidewalks; traffic control; signage;; and other necessary appurtenant work. WHEREAS, the report was received by the City Council on January 22, 2018; and WHEREAS, the reports provide information regarding whether the proposed project is necessary, cost-effective and feasible; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT HEREB Y RESOL VED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA: The Council will consider the proposed improvements for such street in accordance with the Feasibility Report and the assessment of abutting properties for all or a portion of the cost of the improvements pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 at an estimated total cost of the improvements of $2,731,790. 2. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvements on the 121h day of February, 2018 in the Council Chambers of City Hall at 6:30 p.m. and the Clerk shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing and improvements as required by law. ADOPTED BY the Monticello City Council this 22"d day of January, 2015. CITY OF MONTICELLO Brian Stumpf, Mayor Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator \4 'S Ar CITY 0 0 F Montice'�flo [a] m 1:19*3 9141 to—A-011 STREET IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF MONTICELLO I WRIGHT COUNTY, MN JANUARY 22, 2018 Prepared for: City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1 Monticello, MN 55362 CITY PROJECT NO. 17CO01 WSB PROJECT NO. R-010438-000 CHELSEA ROAD UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF MONTICELLO PROJECT NO. 17CO01 FOR THE CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA January 22, 2018 Prepared By: Feasibility Report Chelsea Road Utility and Street Improvements City of Monticello Project No. 17C001 WSB Project No. R-010438-000 January 22, 2018 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1 Monticello, MN 55362 Re: Feasibility Report Chelsea Road Utility and Street Improvements City of Monticello Project No. 17CO01 WSB Project No. R-010438-000 Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council: Transmitted herewith is a feasibility report for the proposed Chelsea Road improvements. This report examines street, sidewalk, trail, and utility improvements along Chelsea Road between Trunk Highway (TH) 25 and Fallon Avenue. I would be happy to discuss this report with you at your convenience. Please feel free to contact me at (763) 271-3236 if you have any questions. Sincerely, WSB & Associates, Inc. F � T k efoq— Shibani K. Bisson, PE City Engineer Attachment cc: Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator, City of Monticello Wayne Oberg, Finance Director, City of Monticello srb Building a legacy — your legacy. Equal Opportunity Employer I wsbeng.com CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed professional engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Eric M. Eckman, PE Date: January 22, 2018 License No. 49954 Quality Control Review Completed By: ZIA Shibani K. Bisson, PE Date: January 22, 2018 License No. 41860 Feasibility Report Chelsea Road Utility and Street Improvements City of Monticello Project No. 17C001 WSB Project No. R-010438-000 TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLE SHEET LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL CERTIFICATION SHEET TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY..................................................................................................1 2. INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................... 2 2.1 Authorization.........................................................................................................2 2.2 Scope.................................................................................................................... 2 3. EXISTING CONDITIONS..................................................................................................3 3.1 Streets................................................................................................................... 3 3.2 Storm Sewer/Drainage..........................................................................................4 3.3 Watermain............................................................................................................. 4 3.4 Sanitary Sewer......................................................................................................4 4. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS........................................................................................5 4.1 Traffic Analysis...................................................................................................... 5 4.2 Street and Pathway Improvements.......................................................................6 4.3 Stormwater Improvements.................................................................................... 7 4.4 Forcemain Improvements......................................................................................8 4.5 Private Utilities.......................................................................................................8 4.6 Permits.................................................................................................................. 8 4.7 Right-of-Way/Easements......................................................................................8 5. FINANCING......................................................................................................................9 5.1 Opinion of Cost......................................................................................................9 5.2 Funding.................................................................................................................9 5.2.1 Assessments............................................................................................. 9 6. PROJECT SCHEDULE..................................................................................................12 7. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS..............................................................13 Appendix A Figure 1 — Project Location Map Figure 2 — Street, Pathway, and Utility Improvements Figure 3 — Forcemain Improvements Figure 4 — Chelsea Road Sanitary Sewer Figure 5 — Typical Section Appendix B Opinions of Probable Cost Appendix C Assessment Map Assessment Roll Appendix D Chelsea Road at Cedar Street Intersection Analysis Memo Feasibility Report Chelsea Road Utility and Street Improvements City of Monticello Project No. 17CO01 WSB Project No. R-010438-000 TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) Appendix E Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Review Feasibility Report Chelsea Road Utility and Street Improvements City of Monticello Project No. 17C001 WSB Project No. R-010438-000 � =V1/ *41j 111 1V/ 4&111�i1LT, T1 Zvi City Project No. 17CO01 consists of roadway, sidewalk, trail facilities, and utility improvements between TH 25 and approximately 800 feet west of Fallon Avenue. A traffic analysis was also completed to identify intersection improvements at Chelsea Road and Cedar Street. A project location map is included on Figure 1 in Appendix A. The segment of Chelsea Road between Edmonson Avenue and west of Fallon Avenue has deteriorated over time and is the last segment of Chelsea Road that has roadside ditches in lieu of curb and gutter with storm sewer. Based on the existing roadway conditions and geotechnical analysis of soil borings obtained in 2017, it is recommended to complete a full -depth pavement reclamation with new bituminous pavement placed on the approximate 1,875 -foot length of Chelsea Road between Edmonson Avenue and Fallon Avenue. It is proposed to widen the road section to 44 feet, add curb and gutter, and construct a stormwater collection system. It is proposed to place a nova chip seal, which is also referred to as ultra-thin bonded wearing course, along Chelsea Road from TH 25 to Edmonson Avenue. It is proposed to change the intersection traffic control at Chelsea Road and Cedar Street to a four-way stop with the installation of stop signs, based on the 2017 traffic warrant analysis performed. It is recommended to monitor traffic conditions after the Fallon Avenue overpass is completed, specifically the eastbound Chelsea Road approach back-up to TH 25. Should this become an issue, installation of a traffic signal and separate right -turn lanes for eastbound and westbound Chelsea Road and northbound Cedar Street should be considered. Based on projected growth rates, it is anticipated that the traffic signal will be needed in 2024; however, it will depend on the growth in the immediate area as well. A roundabout was considered at this intersection; however, because of the unbalanced traffic volumes of each street approach, a traffic signal is recommended as a more feasible alternative to improve traffic operations. Proposed pathway improvements include extending a bituminous trail on the north side of Chelsea Road between Fallon Avenue and Edmonson Avenue and a concrete sidewalk along the south side between Fallon Avenue and Cedar Street. These pathway extensions would complete system gap connections and provide pedestrian facilities on both sides of Chelsea Road to limit crossings. This is the recommendation on collector roadways according to the City's proposed pathway connections guide map. Boulevard tree planting installation along the corridor is proposed with the project. Dual forcemains are proposed to continue to extend along the Chelsea Road boulevard from Cedar Street to the trunk sanitary sewer main just west of Fallon Avenue. This forcemain system, which extends from the Otter Creek lift station, was previously identified in 2005 to address future development in the City's northwest area with the former Heritage/Silver Springs development and was re-evaluated with current land use plans. It is timely to construct the forcemains with this project based on projected growth and to limit construction impacts to one year. The total estimated project cost for the recommended improvements is $2,731,790. This cost includes a 10% contingency and 22% for legal, engineering, administrative, and financing costs. Funding sources for the proposed improvements include special assessments to the adjacent property owners in order to reimburse a portion of a future bond issue or use of reserves, capital improvement funds, and advancement of State Aid funds to finance the project. It is timely to consider moving forward with these improvements at the same time as the Fallon Avenue overpass project in order to limit major construction and traffic impacts to the year 2018. This project is necessary, feasible, and cost-effective from an engineering standpoint and can be constructed as proposed herein. Feasibility Report Chelsea Road Utility and Street Improvements City of Monticello Project No. 17C001 WSB Project No. R-010438-000 Page 1 2-1 Authorization The preparation of this report was authorized by the City Council on July 10, 2017. This project is identified inthe City's Capital Improvement Plan (C|P). This project has been designated eaCity Project Nn.17C001. 2'2 Scope This report addresses street and utility improvements for the reconstruction of Chelsea Road from EdmonsonAvenue toapproximately 800feet west ofFallon Avenue. Additional improvements include trail and sidewalk extensions connecting to existing pathways on either side of the project, surface improvements on Chelsea Road from TH 25 to Edmonson Avenue, intersection analysis and recommendations for improvements at Chelsea Road and Cedar Street, and a sanitary sewer forcemain extension. Amap showing the project location can bafound unFigure finAppendix '4. Feasibility Report Chelsea Road Utility and Street Improvements City vfMonticello Project wu/rcoo/ WsoProject No. ;-o1owoonoo 3. EXISTING CONDITIONS 3.1 Streets Currently, Chelsea Road is approximately a 40 -foot -wide rural road section roadway within an 80 -foot right-of-way between Edmonson Avenue and Fallon Avenue. This segment of Chelsea Road was originally constructed in 1977 with sanitary sewer and watermain installation. Segments of Chelsea Road between TH 25 and Edmonson Avenue were reconstructed in 1996 and 1998 with curb and gutter and storm sewer installation. Chelsea Road from TH 25 to Fallon Avenue is currently a Municipal State Aid route. Pavement Condition Public Works has continued to crack fill, fill potholes, and patch Chelsea Road within the project area over the past several years. City staff inspected Chelsea Road within the project area in 2012 and assigned a Pavement Condition Index (PCI) to the roadway using the City's Pavement Management Program (PMP) software. PCIs are a numerical index between 0 and 100 that indicate the condition of a pavement based on the various pavement distresses recorded during visual observations. A PCI value of 100 represents a pavement in brand new condition, while a PCI value of 0 to 30 represents a pavement section that has fallen into total disrepair requiring a complete reconstruction. The PMP evaluation process involves dividing the pavement surface into sections. The type, extent, and severity of the various pavement distresses noted within each section are then recorded. Numerous types of pavement distresses may exist within a pavement section including, but not limited to, alligator cracking, block cracking, longitudinal cracking, transverse cracking, rutting, raveling, shoving, potholes, and patches. Each type of distress observed receives a rating of low, medium, or high severity based on the extent of the distress noted. Once the field data is gathered, it is then processed using CarteGraph PMP software, which calculates an average PCI rating for each segment analyzed. This PCI value is used to determine the most cost- effective pavement rehabilitation method for each road segment. The resulting ratings are summarized in Table 1 below. Table 1: Pavement Condition Index Ratings Street Name PCI Rating Year Rated Chelsea Road (Edmonson Avenue to Fallon Avenue) 61.35-72.02 2012 Chelsea Road (TH 25 to Edmonson Avenue) 78.0 2017 The ratings on Chelsea Road between Edmonson Avenue and Fallon Avenue are based on inspections completed in 2012; since then, the roadway has deteriorated significantly. Inspection ratings are one factor in determining the pavement condition. Soil borings were taken in September 2017 throughout the project area to evaluate the thickness and integrity of the pavement and underlying soils. The results of the soil borings paired with the proposal to widen Chelsea Road and the necessity of a thicker pavement section due to increased traffic volumes indicate that this segment of roadway would be an ideal candidate for a full -depth pavement reclamation. Details related to the soil borings taken can be found in the geotechnical report located in Appendix E. Trails and Sidewalks Existing bituminous trail on the north side of Chelsea Road terminates at each end of the project area at Edmonson Avenue and Fallon Avenue, with no trail segment in between. Existing sidewalk on the south side of Chelsea Road is located between TH 25 and Cedar Street only, with no sidewalk east of Cedar Street. Feasibility Report Chelsea Road Utility and Street Improvements City of Monticello Project No. 17CO01 WSB Project No. R-010438-000 Page 3 3.2 Storm Sewer/Drainage Drainage ditches exist along both sides of Chelsea Road between Edmonson Avenue and Fallon Avenue to convey stormwater runoff to the City pond on the northeast portion of the project at the City's water reservoir property at 203 Chelsea Road. 3.3 Watermain The watermain system along Chelsea Road consists of 24 -inch ductile iron pipe (DIP) with approximately 8 to 10 feet of cover along the north side of the existing roadway centerline. This watermain was installed in 1977 and is a major trunk line feeding the overall system from the water reservoir. Discussions with Public Works staff indicated the watermain facilities within the project area are functioning adequately and are not in need of repair. 3.4 Sanitary Sewer The sanitary sewer system along Chelsea Road consists of 10 -inch DIP, which was installed in 1979 along the south side of the existing roadway centerline. This pipe collects flow from the adjacent developments and connects to a 24 -inch trunk sewer along the east side of the City's water reservoir site. This trunk main extends to the City's wastewater treatment plant. Discussions with Public Works staff indicated the sanitary sewer facilities within the project area are functioning adequately and are not in need of repair except for manhole adjusting rings which will be replaced. Feasibility Report Chelsea Road Utility and Street Improvements City of Monticello Project No. 17CO01 WSB Project No. R-010438-000 Page 4 El a as] asm=1911 LY, W ZTSITJ 4 Ly,14lkIII 4.1 Traffic Analysis A traffic analysis was completed at the intersection of Chelsea Road and Cedar Street, which is a two- way stop controlled with Cedar Street stopping for Chelsea Road. Traffic data including existing Average Daily Traffic (ADT), AM peak hour, and PM peak hour volumes were collected the week of October 23, 2017. Turning movement counts were also collected. Based on the existing traffic counts the following was concluded: • Existing (2017) ADT on Chelsea Road is 11,350 vpd west of Cedar Street • Existing (2017) ADT on Chelsea Road is 9,400 vpd east of Cedar Street • Existing (2017) ADT on Chelsea Road is 7,900 vpd west of Fallon Avenue • Projected (2038) ADT on Chelsea Road is 17,250 vpd west of Cedar Street • Projected (2038) ADT on Chelsea Road is 14,100 vpd east of Cedar Street • Projected (2038) ADT on Chelsea Road is 11,850 vpd west of Fallon Avenue Three-year crash history (2013-2015), which is the most recent data available, was also collected and demonstrated that the crash and severity rates are greater than the statewide average. There were 11 crashes, out of which six were right-angle crashes. The existing traffic volumes show that the majority of the traffic is traveling through the intersection on Chelsea Road. The largest turning volumes are the southbound left turn from Cedar Street to Chelsea Road and the reverse right turn from Chelsea Road to Cedar Street. The existing operations analysis shows that the worst movement level of service is LOS D. A detailed memo of the traffic analysis is included in Appendix D. Conclusions and Recommendations Based on the alternative improvement analysis the following can be concluded: • All -way stop warrants are currently met with existing traffic volumes, lane configuration, and speed limits. • By adding all -way stop control, the overall intersection LOS would improve slightly from the existing conditions, however, all movement issues (LOS D) would be improved to LOS C or better. • The future year analysis shows that the existing two-way stop would be operating at an overall unsatisfactory level LOS E with movements at LOS E and F. • The future year analysis assuming the proposed alternative improvements show that the existing two-way stop with the addition of turn lanes and all -way stop would not operate at satisfactory levels. The traffic signal system would have an acceptable overall and movement LOS of C or better. • The installation of the additional right -turn lanes for eastbound and westbound Chelsea Road and northbound Cedar Street would improve the operations of the intersection but would not eliminate some of the movement issues. • Over half the reported crashes (six out of nine) are right-angle crashes which are correctable with all -way stop control. • Traffic signal control is not warranted at this time with the existing traffic volumes, lane configuration, and speed limits. However, the traffic operations would slightly improve over the existing two-way stop or all -way stop control. • A roundabout was considered at this intersection; however, because of the unbalanced traffic volumes of each street approach, a traffic signal is recommended as a more feasible alternative to improve traffic operations. Feasibility Report Chelsea Road Utility and Street Improvements City of Monticello Project No. 17C001 WSB Project No. R-010438-000 Page 5 With these conclusions, the following is recommended: 1. Change the intersection control to an all -way stop with the installation of stop signs for the Chelsea Road approaches. This can be completed with the Chelsea Road Utility and Street Reconstruction Project scheduled for 2018. Continue to monitor traffic conditions, specifically the eastbound Chelsea Road approach back-up to TH 25. Should this become an issue, installation of a traffic signal should be considered. Based on projected growth rates, it is anticipated that the signal will be needed in 2024; however, it will depend on the growth in the immediate area as well. 2. With the installation of a traffic signal system include the addition of right -turn lanes for eastbound and westbound Chelsea Road and northbound Cedar Street. 4.2 Street and Pathway Improvements Street and utility improvement layouts and typical sections for the project area are included in Appendix A. Based on the pavement condition and traffic analysis, recommended improvements to Chelsea Road include the following: Edmonson Avenue to Fallon Avenue • Widen the roadway to 44 feet wide with barrier style concrete curb and gutter • Stripe a center left -turn lane from Edmonson Avenue to Fallon Avenue • Install boulevard trees Widening the roadway from the existing 40 -foot width to 44 feet provides for the addition of curb and gutter, provides a consistent street width along the entire street corridor, and would meet the design requirements for a State Aid route. This, paired with the deteriorating pavement conditions and geotechnical evaluation, lends itself to the recommendation of a full -depth pavement reclamation of the existing roadway. TH 25 to Edmonson Avenue The section of Chelsea Road between TH 25 and Edmonson Avenue is recommended to be overlayed with a nova chip asphalt mix which is also referred to as ultra-thin bonded wearing course, in lieu of a mill and overlay, as the severity of the existing pavement distresses do not warrant a mill and overlay. A nova chip overlay could provide a 10 -year extension to the useful life, similar to a mill and overlay, but at a lesser cost. Some cracks may reflect through over time; however, nova chips have proven to hold up well and seal up micro cracks as they develop. The nova chip seal has proven to be an effective surface layer per MnDOT, with its gap graded membrane providing drainage and prevention of moisture from flowing through. The bottom emulsion membrane is durable and has good cracking resistance, which will help to prevent the cracks from reflecting through. It is cost-effective and a quick treatment process as the road can be reopened to traffic in a short amount of time. Trail and Sidewalk Improvements It is recommended to extend a 10 -foot -wide bituminous trail on the north side between Fallon Avenue and Edmonson Avenue and a 6 -foot -wide concrete sidewalk along the south side between Fallon Avenue and Cedar Street. These pathway extensions would connect to the existing pathways on either side of the project, complete system gap connections, and provide pedestrian facilities on both sides of Chelsea Road to limit crossings, as is the recommendation on collector roadways according to the City's proposed pathway connections guide map. Feasibility Report Chelsea Road Utility and Street Improvements City of Monticello Project No. 17C001 WSB Project No. R-010438-000 Page 6 4.3 Stormwater Improvements Existing storm sewer facilities along Chelsea Road currently consist of numerous drainage ditches and driveway culverts along both sides of the roadway which ultimately convey drainage into the City pond located on the City -owned water reservoir property at 203 Chelsea Road. Storm sewer improvements would consist of adding catch basin structures and 15 -inch to 36 -inch reinforced concrete storm sewer pipe along the full length of the project, which will be connected to the existing manholes on the east end of the project which discharge into the City pond. The addition of the curb and gutter and catch basins will eliminate the roadway drainage entering the ditches on either side of Chelsea Road, which can create maintenance issues. The system will be designed to meet current State Aid standards. The existing pond does not need to be expanded for construction of the Chelsea Road storm sewer system. However, as previously identified and included in the City's CIP, the pond will need to be expanded once properties develop within the tributary area of the Chelsea Road storm sewer system. The largest contiguous area of future development is along the north side of Chelsea Road, east of Fallon Avenue. Stormwater Treatment It is the City's practice that reconstruction projects incorporate stormwater treatment systems where feasible. In the past, water quality has been provided by grading new ponds or expanding existing ponds, grading drainage swales, and installing sump manholes or "stormceptor" manholes. The current management of stormwater in this section of the City utilizes drainage ditches to route and discharge stormwater runoff into nearby drainage ponds which eventually routes to the Mississippi River. Flooding or ponding of surface water due to rainfall events is not significantly problematic in this area. This project as proposed will result in a small new net increase in impervious surface area. This project will trigger the threshold to obtain a Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPGA) Construction General Permit (CGP). This project will require the development of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that will require the integration of permanent stormwater management for the increase in impervious surface area that is 1 acre or greater. The SWPPP also requires the development of controls to prevent erosion, construction waste management, and hazardous materials management. The permanent stormwater management for the increase in impervious surface area of 1 acre or greater is to provide a water quality volume of 1.1 inch of runoff from the new impervious surfaces. For this project, there is limited space to provide permanent stormwater management. The MPCA CGP states, "For work on linear projects with lack of right-of-way where the Permittee(s) cannot obtain an easement or other permission for property needed to install treatment systems capable of treating the entire water quality volume on site, the Permittee(s) must maximize the water quality volume that can be treated prior to discharge to surface waters. Treatment can be provided through other methods or combination of methods such as grassed swales, filtration systems, smaller ponds, or grit chambers, prior to discharge to surface waters. A reasonable attempt must be made to obtain right-of-way during the project planning process. Documentation of these attempts must be in the SWPPP per Part III.A.5.m. in the section addressing infeasibility." The goal will be to provide permanent stormwater management to the maximum extent practical given the right-of-way constraints. For other areas, the City will need to consider the installation of sump manholes to minimize their off-site impacts and as a part of the City of Monticello's Municipal Separate Stormwater Sewer System. Feasibility Report Chelsea Road Utility and Street Improvements City of Monticello Project No. 17CO01 WSB Project No. R-010438-000 Page 7 4.4 Forcemain Improvements A layout of the existing and proposed forcemains are included on Figures 3 and 4 in Appendix A. A sanitary sewer capacity analysis was completed in order to determine if extension of dual sanitary sewer forcemains within the Chelsea Road boulevard between Cedar Street and the 24 -inch trunk sanitary sewer main just west of Fallon Avenue is feasible to be constructed at this time or in the future. Considerations for future land uses, development timeline projections in the northwest area, and property impacts/constructability issues were evaluated. The northwest area is defined as the undeveloped area west of TH 25 and south of 1-94 within the annexation boundary. Currently, dual 6 -inch and 16 -inch forcemains extend along Chelsea Road from the Otter Creek lift station to 90th Street where they discharge to a gravity main to the Marvin Road lift station. The dual forcemains are also constructed across the TH 25 intersection and terminate at Chelsea Road and Cedar Street. Extension of these forcemains from the Otter Creek lift station to the trunk sanitary sewer just west of Fallon Avenue was identified as a need to provide sewer capacity in the City's northwest area in 2005, with the former Heritage/Silver Springs development, and was re-evaluated with this study since growth patterns and the land use map in this area has since changed. The interchange land use map adopted by the Council on April 25, 2016, was used to determine projected flows in the analysis. In addition, the forcemain extension was identified as a future improvement in order to redirect flows from the Marvin Road lift station as capacity of that lift station is limited and there is limited capacity in the gravity sewer along Chelsea Road between 90th Street and Innsbrook Drive. As a result of the analysis, it is recommended that 6 -inch and 16 -inch dual sanitary sewer forcemains be extended with this project along Chelsea Road between Cedar Street and the 24 -inch trunk sanitary sewer main just west of Fallon Avenue. The total length of the dual forcemain extension is approximately 3,000 feet and is proposed to be directional drilled within the boulevard areas along Chelsea Road. By constructing the forcemains now, there will not be any future impact to adjacent properties and the proposed sidewalk and trail along Chelsea Road. Flows to the 6 -inch forcemain will not be utilized until development progresses to approximately 100 acres of industrial/commercial development or approximately 190 acres of low-density residential in the northwest area. The remaining dual forcemain segment from 90th Street to TH 25 should be completed as development in the northwest area approaches these thresholds. A more detailed memorandum of the northwest area sewer system has been completed under separate cover and previous studies. 4.5 Private Utilities A Gopher State One Call has been completed to identify the utilities that are in the vicinity of, and adjacent to, the project area. A utility coordination meeting will be held prior to construction to discuss any impact and relocations necessary due to the proposed improvements. 4.6 Permits This project will disturb more than 1 acre; therefore, a National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit will be required. This will result in a need for a stormwater management plan and weekly inspections during construction to ensure no sediment is leaving the project site. 4.7 Right-of-Way/Easements It is anticipated that all work will take place within the existing roadway right-of-way or within existing drainage and utility easements. Additional right-of-way or easement needs are not anticipated to construct the project as proposed. Feasibility Report Chelsea Road Utility and Street Improvements City of Monticello Project No. 17C001 WSB Project No. R-010438-000 Page 8 5. FINANCING 5.1 Opinion of Cost A detailed opinion of probable cost for the proposed improvements can be found in Appendix B of this report. These opinions of probable cost incorporate anticipated 2018 construction costs and include a 10% construction contingency and 22% indirect costs. The indirect costs include legal, engineering, administrative, and financing items. A summary table of the proposed project costs is shown below in Table 2. The estimated project cost as proposed within this report totals $2,731,790. Table 2: Proposed Project Costs Street Name Improvement Type Cost ' Street Reconstruction (Edmonson Avenue to Fallon Avenue) $980,186 Nova Chip Seal (TH 25 to Edmonson Avenue) $117,412 Bituminous Trail Improvements $100,127 Chelsea Road Concrete Sidewalk Improvements $168,112 Forcemain Improvements $999,757 Storm Sewer Improvements $366,196 TOTAL PROJECT COST $2,731,790 5.2 Funding 5.2.1 Assessments A portion of the project costs is proposed to be recovered through assessments levied against benefiting properties in the project area. Assessments are proposed to be collected for surface improvements, trail and sidewalk extensions, and storm sewer installations per the City's adopted assessment policy dated December 11, 2017. These assessments are described below, and a summary is shown in Tables 3 and 4. Non -Residential Street Assessments There are 13 non-residential properties fronting Chelsea Road in the project area. Non- residential lots are proposed to be assessed for street reconstruction at a front foot rate. These rates are based on assessing the City's standard reconstruction rate based on past residential to non-residential equivalent rates, which total $90 per front foot plus 100% of the cost of installing curb and gutter, which equals $15 per foot, bringing the total assessment rate to $105 per front foot. Street improvements to Chelsea Road between TH 25 and Edmonson Avenue are not proposed to be assessed since a chip seal application is involved, which is not subject to assessments. Trail and Sidewalk Assessments The proposed sidewalk and trail extensions along Chelsea Road are proposed to be assessed at a rate of 25% of the total cost to abutting industrial -zoned properties, and a rate of 50% to commercially -zoned properties with the remaining costs being funded by the City. Feasibility Report Chelsea Road Utility and Street Improvements City of Monticello Project No. 17CO01 WSB Project No. R-010438-000 Page 9 Per the City's assessment policy, undeveloped properties will be assessed 100% of the cost since typically it would be constructed and paid for by the developer. There is one undeveloped property within the project area at the southwest corner of Chelsea Road and Edmonson Avenue, where 100% of the sidewalk extension is proposed to be assessed. Since the proposed trail functions the same as the proposed sidewalk, it is proposed to assess the adjacent properties for the sidewalk and trail at the same rate based on the footage of the trail or sidewalk fronting the property. Storm Sewer Assessments Storm sewer assessment rates are based upon each property's contributing drainage area, assessing the full amount of storm sewer costs not including additional upsizing costs (i.e. 15 - inch pipe diameter and larger) to convey the full drainage area. The storm sewer assessment rate is estimated at $12,325 per acre of contributing drainage area. Citv-Owned Property The City currently owns three properties along Chelsea Road that are included in the assessment calculations. The assessment for these properties, including street, trail, sidewalk, and storm sewer assessments, totals $216,930 and is included in the assessment totals noted in Table 3 on the following page. State Property Assessments The State of Minnesota owns one property along Chelsea Road, which is the Department of Transportation's property at 112 Chelsea Road. The 2017 Minnesota Statute 435.19 Subdivision 2 regarding state property reads as follows, "In the case of property owned by the state or any instrumentality thereof, the governing body of the city or town may determine the amount that would have been assessed had the land been privately owned. Such determination shall be made only after the governing body has held a hearing on the proposed assessment after at least two weeks' notice of the hearing has been given by registered or certified mail to the head of the instrumentality, department or agency having jurisdiction over the property. The amount thus determined may be paid by the instrumentality, department or agency from available funds. If no funds are available and such instrumentality, department or agency is supported in whole or in part by appropriations from the general fund, then it shall include in its next budget request the amount thus determined. No instrumentality, department or agency shall be bound by the determination of the governing body and may pay from the available funds or recommend payment in such lesser amount as it determines is the measure of the benefit received by the land from the improvement." It is proposed to assess the State-owned property in the method as all other properties within the project area, but per statute, the State will have final determination whether or not they pay the proposed assessment. The preliminary assessment roll and accompanying map for the project area is included in Appendix C. Feasibility Report Chelsea Road Utility and Street Improvements City of Monticello Project No. 17C001 WSB Project No. R-010438-000 Page 10 Table 3: Preliminary Assessments — Chelsea Road Improvements Type of Rate Front No. of Total Assessment Footage Acres Non -Residential $105/FF 3,703 $388,815 $13.50/FF (industrial) Sidewalk $27/FF (commercial) 3,177 $83,922 $54 (undeveloped) $13.50/FF (industrial) Bituminous Trail $27/FF (commercial) 1,985 $36,922 $54 (undeveloped) Storm Sewer $12,325/Acre 18.1 $223,082 TOTAL $732,741 FF = front foot * Includes City -owned property totaling $216,930 Funding sources for the proposed improvements include special assessments to the adjacent property owners in order to reimburse a portion of a future bond issue or use of reserves, capital improvement funds, and advancement of State Aid funds to finance the project. A summary of the proposed funding is presented in Table 4. Table 4: Proposed Project Funding Assessments City Funds Total State Aid Eligible Street Reconstruction (Edmonson Avenue to Fallon Avenue) $388,815 $591,371 $980,186 $966,766 Nova Chip Seal (TH25 to Edmonson Avenue) - $117,412 $117,412 $117,412 Sidewalk Improvements $83,922 $84,190 $168,112 $168,112 Trail Improvements $36,922 $63,205 $100,127 $100,127 Forcemain Improvements - $999,757 $999,757 - Storm Sewer Improvements $223,082 $143,114 $366,196 $200,142* TOTAL $732,741 $1,985,984 $2,731,790 $1,552,559 * Includes the minimum 55% contribution towards drainage improvements The eligible State Aid funding is estimated at $1,552,559. Currently, the City is advancing funds for previous improvements and could do the same for this project. This will be addressed under a separate resolution separate from this report. Future State Aid allocations may be used for this project once they come available. Feasibility Report Chelsea Road Utility and Street Improvements City of Monticello Project No. 17CO01 WSB Project No. R-010438-000 Page 11 6' PROJECT SCHEDULE The proposed schedule iaaofollows: Phase 1—Femsibi|0tvFet)ort City Council Authorizes Feasibility Study ............................................................................ July 10.2017 Property Owner Meeting ............................................................................................... January 11.2018 City Council Accepts Feasibility Report and Sets Public Hearing Date ................. —.......................................... —........... January 22.2018 City Council Holds Public Hearing/Orders Project/ Authorizes Preparation ofPlans and Specifications ............................................. February 12.2018 Phase 2—Final 0esiqn FinalDesign ......................................................................................................... February — March 2018 Submit Plans toMnDOTState Aid ........................................................................................ March 2018 City Council Approves Plans and Specifications and Authorizes Advertisement for Bids .............................. —.............................. —........ March 12.2018 K4nODTState Aid Approval ...................................................................................................... April 2018 OpenBids ................................................................................................................................. April 2018 City Council Awards Contract ............................................................................................. April 23.2U18 Phase 3—Construction PreonnotnuodcmMeeting ........................................................................................................... May 2018 Begin Construction .................. —.......................................... --- .................................... --June 2O18 Final Completion ............................................................................................................ September 2O18 Feasibility Report Chelsea Road Utility and Street Improvements City vfMonticello Project wu/rcoo/ WsoProject No. ;-o1owoonoo Page 12 7. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS City Project No. 17C001 consists of street, sidewalk, trail, and utility improvements along Chelsea Road. It is the recommendation of City staff that City Project No. 17C001 is feasible, necessary, and cost- effective from an engineering standpoint. It is recommended to accept this feasibility report and call for a public hearing for the project in accordance with state statutes. The following improvements are recommended: 1. Chelsea Road • Widen Chelsea Road between Fallon Avenue and Edmonson Avenue to 44 feet wide with barrier style concrete curb and gutter. • Stripe a center left -turn lane. • Construct a 10 -foot -wide bituminous trail on the north side between Fallon Avenue and Edmonson Avenue. • Construct a 6 -foot -wide concrete sidewalk on the south side between Fallon Avenue and Cedar Street. • Place a nova chip overlay between TH 25 and Edmonson Avenue. • Install boulevard tree plantings along the corridor. • Extend 6 -inch and 16 -inch dual forcemains along the Chelsea Road boulevard from Cedar Street to the trunk sanitary sewer main just west of Fallon Avenue. 2. Chelsea Road and Cedar Street Intersection Change the intersection traffic control at Chelsea Road and Cedar Street to a four-way stop with the installation of stop signs, based on the 2017 traffic warrant analysis performed. It is recommended to monitor traffic conditions after the Fallon Avenue overpass is completed, specifically the eastbound Chelsea Road approach back-up to TH 25. Should this become an issue, installation of a traffic signal and separate right -turn lanes along the Chelsea Road approaches should be considered. Based on projected growth rates, it is anticipated that the signal will be needed in 2024; however, it will depend on the growth in the immediate area as well. Feasibility Report Chelsea Road Utility and Street Improvements City of Monticello Project No. 17C001 WSB Project No. R-010438-000 Page 13 APPENDIX A Figure 1 — Project Location Map Figure 2 — Street, Pathway, and Utility Improvements Figure 3 — Forcemain Improvements Figure 4 — Chelsea Road Sanitary Sewer Figure 5 — Typical Section Feasibility Report Chelsea Road Utility and Street Improvements City of Monticello Project No. 17CO01 WSB Project No. R-010438-000 8� S1• 4T wN Srhl 6r4 IV Ir 4, 7TH ST ,ph ST lvpt CITY OF Monti 0 ti Chelsea Street A CIVw 'Ve4 -'k1b Road Utility and Improvements EAGLE City Project #1 7CO01 N 0 11000 A WSB Project #010438-000 INEEMENE::= WSB Monticello, MN A 1 inch = 1,000 feet AVANNIMMEWL r M CHELSEA ROAD UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS STREET, PATHWAY, AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA WSB Project No. 010438-000 CITY OF City Project No. 17CO01 MFigure Number 2 onti eRo Date: 1/8/2018 MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA WSB Project No. 010438-000 CITY OF City Project No. 17CO01 Figure Number 3 Monticdo Date: 1/8/2018 11I I., W ll Y 1% .4 I! A 3 X4 T T'll, it u *�4 Rr� ?5 Q`2&1�� 611 M 01 IQ —1 Q q 4, 2: 'T *A 5 Otter Cr '7, fo 1�5 _f :,6 'ej 0,1 41 l I t 211 1 Lift Stat 5 V: . . .... '4 �g, 411, 7 . ..... g 2 ;y, i'W gol d �Q Not OW� '%91' 1 Z�l %M % Minnesota Street "N" Limiting Pipe Segrrl 'r A As -Built S 56 f 7— % 3 A, 5 �00 A, . .......... f 7% "o, 4r� Vir a q4 V i�MANlCk'a Marvin a 41, P'' Lift Station T, l �X K N. 0 Nol N AP), lX F Existing Sanitary Lift Station v11 H" I Existing Sanitary Forcemain 0, Forcemain Extension Future Discharge I ocation 'T �Vl 'u Future Sanitary Forcemain 49,0'o�49 ZZ, U 24 -inch Gravity Main 1�11:, Proposed Sanitary Forcernain ld!�, . . . . ........ . Existing Sanitary Gravity Main 4: Chelsea Road Hl Diameter �t,, #'Il&nr�" I Limiting Pipe Segment -Built S 182 Unknown 4, "A" I 4 1 A 8" '0 Fix'' i k "I 116 A ll11., 101, OF 11 Mii IT: ;I 12" Of& ITO'' _1 7 15" 10l 1, 11 'q, A I I 16" K �oe V k U _lp -W 18" 1�0 l�,� , : 4� "A ............ 20" Future 6 -inch & 16 -inch Proposed 6 -inch & 16 -inch 0 ol orc; q;,", 21 Forcemain Extension F emain Extension lwith CP 17CO01 7777!�WZ I Alignment TBD 'U' Y 24" 0"1''. f E 30" W I A e, Parcel Boundai -y Q CI IFY OF Figure 4 N A 4 11 Chelsea Road Sanitary Sewer 0 700 __._�*Monticeuo Feet WSB ,,---,,*,NNNNl� City of Monticello, MN I inch = 700 feet AVANOMMOMMOk INSET "A" 1.5" TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE SPWEB340C 2' TYPE SP 12.5 NON—WEARING COURSE MIXTURE SPWEB330C 2" TYPE SP 12.5 NON—WEARING COURSE MIXTURE SPWEB330C 8" AGGREGATE BASE R/W 80' INSET "B" 17' 44' CONCRETE SIDEWALK 10, 6' 3' 12' 14' BIT. TRAIL BLVD. THROUGH LANE TURN LANE 12 3' 12' 6' 11 THROUGH LANE BLVD. SIDEWALK B-618 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER 4" CONCRETE PAVEMENT A_ 2.0% 2.09,' 12" SELECT GRANULAR I L SEE INSET "C" L-------------- ------ --- . "A" . . . . . . . . . . . . . J =1 SEE INSET INSET "C" BITUMINOUS TRAIL 3" SPWEA2408 BITUMINOUS WEAR MIXTURE 6" AGGREGATE BASE W B CHELSEA ROAD UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS TYPICAL SECTION MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA MAX SCOPE SEE INSET "B" WSB Project No. 010438-000 F City Project No. 17CO01 CITY 0 11 1-IfNIIIIIIA"N Figure Number 51 -Mont nu Date: 1/8/2018 Ell R/W J 19' Y-1 12 3' 12' 6' 11 THROUGH LANE BLVD. SIDEWALK B-618 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER 4" CONCRETE PAVEMENT A_ 2.0% 2.09,' 12" SELECT GRANULAR I L SEE INSET "C" L-------------- ------ --- . "A" . . . . . . . . . . . . . J =1 SEE INSET INSET "C" BITUMINOUS TRAIL 3" SPWEA2408 BITUMINOUS WEAR MIXTURE 6" AGGREGATE BASE W B CHELSEA ROAD UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS TYPICAL SECTION MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA MAX SCOPE SEE INSET "B" WSB Project No. 010438-000 F City Project No. 17CO01 CITY 0 11 1-IfNIIIIIIA"N Figure Number 51 -Mont nu Date: 1/8/2018 Ell /_1»=1►U1L4:1 Opinions of Probable Cost Feasibility Report Chelsea Road Utility and Street Improvements City of Monticello Project No. 17C001 WSB Project No. R-010438-000 Opinion of Probable Cost F SB Prqject: Chelsea Road Utility and Street Improvements Design Br: BFB Project Location: City of Monticello Checked BY: EME Cin• Prqject No.: 170001 2104.50100110 REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT WSB Project No: 1 043 8-000 Date: 1/4/2018 3 2104.502 EstimatedEstimated REMOVE CASTING Item MN/DOT 1 $100.00 $100.00 4 2018 MnDOT Description Notes Unit Total Estimated Total Cost No. Specification No. 6 Unit Price $18000 5 2104.502 Quantity REMOVE MAIL BOX SUPPORT A. Street Improvements 1 2021.501 2021.50100010 MOBILIZATION (5% MAXIMUM) LUMP SUM 1 $38,900.00 $38,900.00 2 2104.501 2104.50100110 REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SQ YD 1266 $4.00 $5.064.00 3 2104.502 2104.50200820 REMOVE CASTING EACH 1 $100.00 $100.00 4 2104.502 2104.50201220 REMOVE SIGN EACH 6 $30.00 $18000 5 2104.502 2104.50201940 REMOVE MAIL BOX SUPPORT EACH 7 $25.00 $17500 6 2104.502 2104.50201960 SALVAGE CASTING EACH 4 $200.00 $800.00 7 2104.503 2104.50300205 SAWING BIT PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) LIN FT 105 $5.00 $52500 8 2104.503 2104.50300325 REMOVE CONCRETE CURB LIN FT 450 $3.00 $1,350.00 9 2104.601 2104.60101510 SALVAGE LANDSCAPE STRUCTURES LUMP SUM 1 $5,000.00 $5,00000 10 2105.507 2105.50700015 COMMON EXCAVATION CU YD 4500 $15.00 $67,500.00 11 2105.507 2105 50700050 SUBGRADE EXCAVATION CU YD 278 $15.00 $4,17000 12 2105.507 2105.50700290 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW (CV) CU YD 278 $18.00 $5,004.00 13 2112.519 2112 51900010 SUBGRADE PREPARATION ROAD STA 2 $200.00 $40000 14 2123.610 2123.61000410 STREET SWEEPER (WITH PICKUP BROOM) HOUR 35 $200.00 $7,000.00 15 2130.523 2130 52300010 WATER MGAL 50 $30.00 $1,50000 16 2211.509 2211.50900070 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 TON 4410 $18.00 $79,380.00 17 2215.504 2215 50400010 FULL DEPTH RECLAMATION SQ YD 9167 $3.00 $27.501.00 18 2357.506 2357.50600010 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GALLON 940 $3.00 $2,820.00 21 2360.504 2360.50422230 TYPE SP 9 5 WEARING COURSE MIX (2.B) 3.0" THICK SQ YD 1266 $30.00 $37,98000 19 2360.509 2360.50923300 TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (3,C) TON 796 $65.00 $51,740.00 20 2360.509 2360.50923305 TYPE SP 12.5 NON WEAR COURSE MIX (3.C) TON 2123 $65.00 $137,99500 22 2502.601 2502.60103000 IRRIGATION SYSTEM PROVISION LUMP SUM 1 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 20 2504.602 2504.60200025 ADJUST HYDRANT EACH 5 $2,000.00 $10.000.00 21 2504.602 2504.60200032 ADJUST GATE VALVE & BOX EACH 9 $500.00 $4,500.00 23 2505.601 2505 60100000 UTILITY COORDINATION LUMP SUM 1 $5,000.00 $5.000.00 21 2506.502 2506.50206000 CASTING ASSEMBLY EACH 1 $550.00 $550.00 22 2506.521 2506 52100000 INSTALL SALVAGED CASTING EACH 4 $550.00 $2.200.00 23 2506.602 2506.60200000 CHIMNEY SEALS (EXTERNAL) EACH 5 $300.00 $1,500.00 24 2531.503 2531.50302315 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN 8618 LIN FT 3938 $20.00 $78,76000 25 2531.618 2531.61800000 ADA COMPLIANCE SUPERVISOR LUMP SUM 1 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 26 2540.602 2540.60200145 MAIL BOX EACH 7 $50.00 $350.00 27 2540.602 2540.60200150 MAIL BOX SUPPORT EACH 7 $150.00 $1,050.00 28 2540.602 2540.60200000 MAIL BOX (TEMPORARY) EACH 10 $35.00 $35000 29 2540.602 2540.60200140 INSTALL MAILBOX EACH 7 $50.00 $350.00 30 2563.601 2563 60100010 TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP SUM 1 $15,000.00 $15.000.00 31 2564.518 2564.51800130 SIGN PANELS TYPE C SQ FT 140 $45.00 $6,300.00 32 2564.518 2564.51800170 INSTALL SIGN TYPE SPECIAL EACH 4 $250.00 $1.000.00 33 2571.524 2571.52405080 CONIFEROUS TREE 8' HT B&B EACH 18 $550.00 $9,900.00 34 2571.524 2571.52412250 DECIDUOUS TREE 2 5" CAL B&B EACH 18 $550.00 $9,90000 35 2571.601 2571.60100000 INSTALL LANDSCAPE STRUCTURES LUMP SUM 1 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 39 2573.501 2573 50100025 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXIT EACH 2 $1,000.00 $2,00000 37 2573.502 2573.50200110 STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION EACH 25 $250.00 $6,250.00 38 2573.503 2573 50300061 SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG TYPE WOOD FIBER LIN FT 2500 $4.00 $10,00000 36 2573.503 2573.50300230 SILT FENCE, TYPE MS LIN FT 2000 $2.00 $4,000.00 40 2574.507 2574.50700100 COMMON TOPSOIL BORROW CU YD 1458 $20.00 $29,16000 41 2575.504 2575.50400012 SODDING TYPE SALT TOLERANT SQ YD 4375 $5.50 $24,062.50 42 2575.504 2575 50400053 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET CATEGORY 3 SQ YD 875 $3.00 $2,62500 43 2582.503 2582.50300000 4" SOLID LINE PAINT WHITE LIN FT 3750 $1.00 $3,750.00 44 2582.503 2582 50300000 4" DOUBLE SOLID LINE PAINT YELLOW LIN FT 1875 $2.00 $3,75000 CONSTRUCTION TOTAL $730,392.00 CONTINGENCY TOTAL (10%) $73,039.00 SUBTOTAL TOTAL $803,431.00 INDIRECT COST TOTAL (22%) $176,755.00 TOTAL - STREET IMPROVEMENTS $980,186.00 K:\010438-000\Quantity\Pref i mi nary\10438-000_OPC_010418 Opinion of Probable Cost F SB Prqject: Chelsea Road Utility and Street Improvements Project Location: City of Monticello Cin• Prqject No.: 170001 WSB Project No: 1 043 8-000 Item MN/DOT 2018 MnDOT Description No. Specification No. A2. Street Improvements (TH 25 to Edmonson Ave) 1 2404.618 2404 61800100 CHIP SEAL WEARING COURSE (NOVA CHIP) 2 2504.602 2504.60200032 ADJUST GATE VALVE & BOX 3 2506.502 2506 50206020 ADJUST FRAME & RING CASTING 4 2563.601 2563.60100010 TRAFFIC CONTROL 5 2573.503 2573.50300230 SILT FENCE. TYPE MS 6 2573.502 2573.50200110 STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION 7 2571.524 2571.52405080 CONIFEROUS TREE 8' HT B&B 8 2571.524 2571.52412250 DECIDUOUS TREE 2.5" CAL B&B 9 2582.518 2582.51801000 PAVT MSSG EPDXY 10 2582.503 2582.50300000 4" SOLID LINE WHITE-EPDXY 11 2582.503 2582 50300000 4" SOLID LINE YELLOW-EPDXY 12 2582.503 2582.50300000 4" DOUBLE SOLID LINE YELLOW-EPDXY 13 2582.503 2582 50300000 12" SOLID LINE EPDXY 14 2582.518 2582.51805000 CROSSWALK EPDXY B 1. Sidewalk Improvements (South Side) 1 2105.507 2105 50700290 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW (CV) 2 2521.518 2521.51800040 4" CONCRETE WALK 3 2531.602 2531.60200050 PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP 4 2531.618 2531.61800010 TRUNCATED DOMES 132. Trail Improvements (North Side) 1 2360.504 2360.50422230 TYPE SP 9 5 WEARING COURSE MIX (2.B) (3.0" THICK) 2 2531.602 2531.60200050 PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP 3 2531.618 2531.61800010 TRUNCATED DOMES Design 41: BFB Checked BY: EME CU YD Date: 1/4/2018 SQ FT 18,900 $6.00 Estimated EACH 3 $500.00 $1.500.00 SQ FT 36 $35.00 Estimated Notes Unit Total CONTINGENCY TOTAL (10%) Estimated Total Cost SUBTOTAL TOTAL $137,797.00 Unit Price INDIRECT COST TOTAL (22%) $30,315.00 Quantity - SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS SQ YD 9.800 $6.00 $58,80000 EACH 2 $500.00 $1,000.00 EACH 13 $350.00 $4,55000 LUMP SUM 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 LIN FT 1000 $2.00 $2.00000 EACH 5 $250.00 $1,250.00 EACH 4 $550.00 $2.200.00 EACH 4 $550.00 $2,200.00 SQ FT 200 $10.00 $2,00000 LIN FT 2850 $1.00 $2,850.00 LIN FT 1200 $1.00 $1.200.00 LIN FT 840 $2.00 $1,680.00 LIN FT 100 $6.00 $600.00 SQ FT 360 $6.00 $2,160.00 CONSTRUCTION TOTAL $87,490.00 CONTINGENCY TOTAL (10%) $8,749.00 SUBTOTAL TOTAL $96,239.00 INDIRECT COST TOTAL (22%) $21,173.00 TOTAL - STREET IMPROVEMENTS $117,412.00 CU YD 759 $12.00 $9,10800 SQ FT 18,900 $6.00 $113,40000 EACH 3 $500.00 $1.500.00 SQ FT 36 $35.00 $1,26000 CONSTRUCTION TOTAL $125,270.00 CONTINGENCY TOTAL (10%) $12,527.00 SUBTOTAL TOTAL $137,797.00 INDIRECT COST TOTAL (22%) $30,315.00 TOTAL - SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS $168,112.00 SQ YD 2.445 $29.00 $70,90500 EACH 3 $500.00 $1.500.00 SQ FT 48 $46.00 $2,20800 CONSTRUCTION TOTAL $74,610.00 CONTINGENCY TOTAL (10%) $7,461.00 SUBTOTAL TOTAL $82,071.00 INDIRECT COST TOTAL (22%) $18,056.00 TOTAL - TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS $100,127.00 K:\010438-000\Quantity\Pref i mi nary\10438-000_OPC_010418 Opinion of Probable Cost F SB Prqject: Chelsea Road Utility and Street Improvements Design Br: BFB Project Location: City of Monticello Checked BY: EME Cin• Prqject No.: 170001 LIN FT 25 $100.00 WSB Project No: 1 043 8-000 Date: 1/4/2018 AIR RELIEF MANHOLE EACH EstimatedEstimated $46,00000 Item MN/DOT 2503.602 2503.60200000 CONNECT TO EXISTING MANHOLE EACH 2018 MnDOT Description Notes Unit Total Estimated Total Cost No. Specification No. 2503 60300000 Unit Price LIN FT 3.000 $50.00 $150,00000 Quantity 2503.603 C. Sanitary Sewer Improvements 1 2021.501 2021.50100010 MOBILIZATION (5% MAXIMUM) LUMP SUM 1 $35,475.00 $35.47500 2 2503.503 2503.50300000 24" HDPE PIPE SEWER LIN FT 25 $100.00 $2,500.00 3 2503.602 2503 60200200 AIR RELIEF MANHOLE EACH 2 $23,000.00 $46,00000 4 2503.602 2503.60200000 CONNECT TO EXISTING MANHOLE EACH 1 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 5 2503.603 2503 60300000 6" HDPE PIPE SEWER -DIRECTIONAL DRILLED LIN FT 3.000 $50.00 $150,00000 6 2503.603 2503.60300000 16" HDPE PIPE SEWER -DIRECTIONAL DRILLED LIN FT 3,000 $150.00 $450,000.00 7 2506.502 2506 50200000 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN SPECIAL 2 EACH 1 $21,000.00 $21,00000 8 2506.502 2506.50200000 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN SPECIAL 3 EACH 1 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 9 2506.602 2506.60206220 CONNECT TO EXISTING DRAINAGE STRUCTURE EACH CONSTRUCTION TOTAL $744,975.00 10 2506.503 2506 50302420 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN 48-4020 LIN FT CONTINGENCY TOTAL (10%) $74,498.00 11 2506.602 2506.60206370 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN SPECIAL 1 EACH SUBTOTAL TOTAL $819,473.00 INDIRECT COST TOTAL (22%) $180,284.00 TOTAL - SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS $999,757.00 D. Storm Sewer Improvements 1 2021.501 2021.50100010 MOBILIZATION (5% MAXIMUM) LUMP SUM 1 $12,994.00 $12,994.00 2 2104.502 2104.50200910 REMOVE DRAINAGE STRUCTURE EACH 2 $500.00 $1.000.00 3 2104.503 2104.50300255 REMOVE PIPE CULVERTS LIN FT 450 $15.00 $6,750.00 4 2501.503 2501.50313155 15' RC PIPE CULVERT CLASS V LIN FT 648 $35.00 $22.680.00 5 2501.503 2501.50313185 18" RC PIPE CULVERT CLASS V LIN FT 416 $45.00 $18,720.00 6 2501.503 2501.50313245 24" RC PIPE CULVERT CLASS V LIN FT 155 $65.00 $10,07500 7 2501.503 2501.50313305 30" RC PIPE CULVERT CLASS V LIN FT 662 $85.00 $56,270.00 8 2501.503 2501.50313365 36" RC PIPE CULVERT CLASS V LIN FT 743 $95.00 $70,58500 9 2506.602 2506.60206220 CONNECT TO EXISTING DRAINAGE STRUCTURE EACH 2 $1,500.00 $3,000.00 10 2506.503 2506 50302420 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN 48-4020 LIN FT 132 $400.00 $52,80000 11 2506.602 2506.60206370 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN SPECIAL 1 EACH 12 $1,500.00 $18,000.00 CONSTRUCTION TOTAL $272,874.00 CONTINGENCY TOTAL (10%) $27,287.00 SUBTOTAL TOTAL $300,161.00 INDIRECT COST TOTAL (22%) $66,035.00 TOTAL - STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS $366,196.00 K:\010438-000\Quantity\Pref i mi nary\10438-000_OPC_010418 APPENDIX C Assessment Map Assessment Roll Feasibility Report Chelsea Road Utility and Street Improvements City of Monticello Project No. 17CO01 WSB Project No. R-010438-000 in a Assessment Map N , z,f, OF Chelsea Road Utility and Street Improvements Mont1Ce U Monticello, MN 0 350 AFeet WSB City Project No. 17CO01 Date: 1/8/18 1 inch = 350 feet ANNEENNEW (Preliminary Assessment Roll - Chelsea Road Utility and Street Improvements I Chelsea Road Utility and Street Improvements 177.3 $2700 CITY OF MONTICELLO, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA 090 $12,32500 CITY PROJECT NO 17CO01 $478710 $11,092.50 WISE PROJECT NO. 10438 1412 $10500 1412 $2700 1.88 084 $12,32500 $14,82600 PROPERTY $10,353.00 $28,99140 3315 No IDENTIFICATION NO PROPERTY OWNER PROPERTY MAILING Land Use $12,32500 (PID' $447525 ADDRESS $43.84300 Map ID PID Owner Name Property Address Land Use 1 155244001010 JOVAN PROPERTIES LLC 3394 EDMONSON AVE NE BUFFALO MN 55313 Commeraal 2 155244001020 RED ROOSTER PROPERTIES INC 9495 DEEGAN AVE HE MONTICELLO MN 55362 Commeraal 3 155018002011 W K PROPERTIES LLC 108 CHELSEA RD MONTICELLO MN 55362 Industrial 4 155018002020 STATE OF MINNESOTA - DOT 3725 12TH ST N ST CLOUD MN 56303 Industrial 5 155018002030 SCHOEN PROPERTIES LP 200 CHELSEA RD MONTICELLO MN 55362 Industrial 6 155018002031 MJD INVESTMENTS LLC 206 CHELSEA RD MONTICELLO MN 55362 Industrial 7 155018001050 CITY OF MONTICELLO 505 WALNUT ST STE 1 MONTICELLO MN 55362 Public 8 155018001041 WES EPRUNK PROPERTIES LLC 3451 S 40TH ST PHOENIX AZ 85040 Industrial 9 155018001030 SMA PROPERTIES LLC PO BOX 10 MONTICELLO MN 55362 Industrial 10155018001020 CITY OF MONTICELLO 505 WALNUT ST STE 1 MONTICELLO MN 55362 Public i i 155018001012 CITY OF MONTICELLO 505 WALNUT ST STE 1 MONTICELLO MN 55362 Public 12 155500142104 PREMIER BANK MINNESOTA 301 CENTRAL AVE OSSEO MN 55369 Commercial 13 155018002040 TAPPER'S HOLDINGS LLC 3935 WALDEN LN WAYZATA MN 55391 Industrial (Note #6 front footage has been adjusted due to the adjacent drainage easemen $1350 TOTAL CHELSEA STORM TOTAL CHELSEA TOTAL STORM ROAD PATHWAY SEWER PROPOSED FF ROAD FF PATHWAY LOT DRAINAGE SEWER ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT CHELSEA RATE PATHWAY RATE AREA AREA RATE 177.3 $10500 177.3 $2700 1.79 090 $12,32500 $18,61650 $478710 $11,092.50 $3449610 1412 $10500 1412 $2700 1.88 084 $12,32500 $14,82600 $3,81240 $10,353.00 $28,99140 3315 $10500 331.5 $1350 4.57 037 $12,32500 $34,807.50 $447525 $4,56025 $43.84300 5200. $10500 5200. $1350 7.16 496 $12,32500 $54,60000 $7,02000 $61,132.00 $122,75200 408.9 $10500 408.9 $1350 5.58 366 $12,32500 $42,934.50 $5,52015 $45,10950 $93,56415 255.0 $10500 321.0 $1350 1.90 026 $12,32500 $26,775.00 $4,33350 $3,204.50 $3431300 414.7 $10500 530.0 $1350 8.55 175 $12,32500 $43,54350 $7,15500 $21,568.75 $72,26725 350.0 $10500 350.0 $1350 4.78 084 $12,32500 $36,750.00 $4,72500 $10,353.00 $51,82800 355.0 $10500 355.0 $1350 243 081 $12,32500 $37,275.00 $4,79250 $9,98325 $5205075 360.0 $10500 3600 $2700 247 165 $12,32500 $37,80000 $9,72000 $20,33625 $67,85625 3894 $10500 390.0 $2700 2.64 206 $12,32500 $40,887.00 $10,53000 $25,389.50 $76,80650 9070 $5400 $48,97800 $48,97800 370 0 $13 50 $4,99500 $4,995 00 37030 5161 9 43.7 1816 $732,741.40 K \010438-000\Admin\Docs\Assessments\10438-000_ Preliminary Assessment Roll 011618 /_1»=1►1910D7 Chelsea Road at Cedar Street Intersection Analysis Memo Feasibility Report Chelsea Road Utility and Street Improvements City of Monticello Project No. 17CO01 WSB Project No. R-010438-000 WSB Infrastructure ■ Engineering ■ Planning ■ Construction 701 Xenia Avenue South to � "o faoe' rn, _ Suite #300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763 541-4800 Fax: 763 541-1700 Memorandum To: Shibani Bisson, P.E., City Engineer City of Monticello Front: Chuck Rickart, PE, PTOE, Transportation Engineer WSB & Associates, Inc. Date: December 18, 2017 Re: Chelsea Road at Cedar Street Intersection Analysis City of Monticello WSB Project No. 10438-000 Introduction The City of Monticello has identified concerns at the intersection of Chelsea Road and Cedar Street south of I-94 and west of TH 25. The primary issues that have been identified include safety, lane geometry, traffic control and overall operations at the intersection. The purpose of this report is to document the existing traffic and safety conditions and to provide recommendations for improving safety and operations at the intersection. Figure I shows the project location. Th following data was collected at the intersection: • traffic volumes • intersection lane configuration • three-year crash history (2013-2015) • existing intersection control and signage The traffic volumes, signage, and lane configurations were used to qualitatively evaluate how individuals are using each intersection. The crash history was used to gain an understanding of safety concerns that exist at each location. In addition, Synchro/SimTraffic was used to evaluate the traffic operations at each intersection. An all -way stop and traffic signal warrant analysis was performed at the intersection. After studying the available information, recommendations to improve the safety and operations efficiency were developed. The following is a summary of the information collected and recommendations for the intersection. Chelsea Road at Cedar Street Intersection Analysis December 18, 2017 Page 2 of 8 I m I Chelsea Road at Cedar Street Intersection Analysis December 18, 2017 Page 3 of 8 Existing Conditions The intersection is located approximately 300 feet east of TH 25. Chelsea Road is a four -lane minor collector roadway with a raised concrete median at the intersection. A 40mph speed limit is posted on Chelsea Road. Cedar Street is a two-lane local City street with a raised concrete median at the intersection. A 30mph speed limit is posted on Cedar Street. Marked and signed pedestrian crossings are provided across the west Chelsea Road approach and the north Cedar Street approach. The intersection is two-way stop controlled with Cedar Street stopping for Chelsea Road. The intersection has the following lane configurations: • Southbound Cedar St Approach: one right -turn, one through, one left -turn. • Westbound Chelsea Rd Approach: one through/right-turn, one through, one left -turn • Northbound Cedar St Approach: one through/right-turn, one left -turn • Eastbound Chelsea Rd Approach: one through/right-turn, one through, one left -turn The three-year crash history for this intersection is shown in Table I and Table 2. A total of eleven crashes were observed from 2013 to 2015 of which nine were property damage and 2 were personal injury. Of the eleven crashes 6 were right angle crashes. The calculated crash and severity rates are greater than the statewide average as outlined in the MnDOT 2015 "Green Sheets", for un -signalized urban through -stop controlled intersections. This is document that identifies average crash rates and severity rates for specific types and locations of roadways and intersections. Table 1: Crash History at Chelsea Road and Cedar Street Location Chelsea Rd at Cedar St PD = Property Damage PI = Personal Injury Crashes 2013 2014 2015 Total PD I PI PD I PI PD PI Crashes Table 2: Crash Rates at Chelsea Road and Cedar Street ii Number Daily Crash Rate* Severity Rate Location of Entering Crashes Vehicles Calculated Average Critical*** Calculated Average** Chelsea Rd at Cedar St 11 9,350 1.07 0.19 0.46 1.27 0.27 * — Intersection crash rates are expressed in crashes per million entering vehicles. ** — Average for urban through -stop intersection using MnDOT 2015 green sheets *** — Critical crash rates are expressed in crashes per million entering vehicles with 0.95 confidence level Chelsea Road at Cedar Street Intersection Analysis December 18, 2017 Page 4 of 8 Traffic volumes at the intersection were counted October 24'h through October 26"', 2017. The AM peak hour occurred from 7:00 AM to 8:00 AM when a total of 729 vehicles were observed. The PM peak hour occurred from 4:00 PM to 5:00 PM when a total of 1092 vehicles were observed. Based on the traffic counts there is an average of 4.5% heavy vehicles on these roadways. The existing intersection layout, traffic control and peak hour turning movement volumes are shown on Figure 2. Intersection operations are evaluated in terms of average seconds of delay per vehicle at the intersection, for each approach and turning movement. The average number of seconds of delay is broken into six ranges assigned letter grades A through F defining each level of service (LOS). Synchro/SimTraffic software was used to simulate traffic operations at the intersection. The results of the Synchro/SimTraffic modeling for the existing conditions is shown in Table 3. Table 3: Existing (2017) Traffic Operations at Chelsea Road and Cedar Street Intersection AM Peak PM Peak o Movement Delay (LOS) Movement Delay (LOS) Location Appr Intersection Intersection U Left Thru Right Delay(LOS) Left Thru Right Delay/LOS n, 0 Chelsea Road at Cedar Street H NB 9 (A) 18 (C) 6 (A) WB 2 (A) 0 (A) 0 (A) SB 25 (D) EB 3 (A) C 1 C 1 (A) 0 (A) 16 (C) 25 (D) 12 (B) 2 (A) 1 (A) i (A) 27 (D) 19 (C) 14 (B) 6 (A) l (A) 0 (A) 18 (C) The intersection was also evaluated for the future 20 -year traffic forecast. The forecast was projected based on the Wright County State Aid projection factor of 1.5 for a 20 -year period. The results indicate that the overall level of service reduces to LOS E with several movements operating at a LOS E and F. Table 4 below shows the results of the analysis. Table 4: Projected (203 7) Traffic Operations at Chelsea Road and Cedar Street Intersection AM Peak PM Peak Movement Delay (LOS) Movement Delay (LOS) Location Appr Intersection Intersection U Left Thru Right Delay(LOS) Left Thru Right Delay/LOS a 0 Chelsea Road at Cedar Street H NB 20 (C) 38 (E) 14 (B) WB 14 (B) 4 (A) 4 (A) S13 '26 (D) 22 (C) EB 12 (B) 5 (A) 4 (A) 34 (D) 30 (D) 16 (C) 7 (A) 7 (A) 38 (E) 42 (E) 31 (D) 20 (C) 9 (A) 9 (A) 42 (E) Chelsea Road at Cedar Street Intersection Analysis December 18, 2017 Page 5 of 8 Intersection Improvement Alternatives Based on the existing safety analysis and operations analysis several improvement alternatives including turn lane configuration and traffic control were analyzed. Each alternative is discussed below. Turn Lane Additions The existing traffic volumes show that the majority of the traffic is traveling through the intersection on Chelsea Road. The largest turning volumes are the southbound left turn from Cedar Street to Chelsea Road and the reverse right turn from Chelsea Road to Cedar Street. The existing operations analysis shows that the worst movement level of service is LOS D. The movements with a LOS D are the northbound through in the PM peak hour and the southbound left turn during both the AM and PM peak hour. Currently the only movements that are not provided are the right turn lanes for westbound Chelsea Road to Cedar Street, eastbound Chelsea Road to Cedar Street and northbound Cedar Street to Chelsea Road. These movements were added to the network and analyzed. The results found that the overall LOS would improve to LOS A during AM peak hour and LOS B during the AM peak hour. The northbound through movement would improve to a LOS C during the PM peak hour, while the southbound left turn would continue to operate at a LOS D. Table 4 below shows the results of the analysis. Traffic Control Chanzes The existing intersection control is a two-way stop condition. The intersection was evaluated for traffic control changes using the warrants found in the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MnMUTCD) for all -way stop control (Part 2B) and for traffic signal control (Part 4). Based on the warrant analysis the intersection does not meet traffic signal warrants however, it does meet 6 of 8 hours for Warrant #1 (Eight Hour Volume) and Warrant #7 (Crash Experience), with existing traffic volumes, lane geometry, and speed limits. However, the intersection meets the warrants for all -way stop control. The warrant analysis worksheets are attached in the Appendix. An operations analysis was conducted assuming the all -way stop and traffic signal control alternatives. The results are shown below in Table S. Based on the results the intersection would have improved operations with all movements at LOS C or better with both all -way stop control or signal control. However, the analysis does show that with an all -way stop the 95% vehicle queues would back up approximately 200 feet on the eastbound Chelsea Road approach. While this does not currently back up to TH 25 (300 feet), with future increase in traffic this could become an issue. A future 20 -year analysis was completed using the proposed traffic control intersection alternatives. The results indicate that with the two-way stop control (with turn lanes) and all -way stop control alternatives at LOS E and F. The traffic signal alternative shows that the overall and movement levels of service will be LOS C or better. Table 6 below shows the results of the future 2037 traffic analysis. Chelsea Road at Cedar Street Intersection Analysis December 18, 2017 Page 6 of 8 Table S: Existing (201 7) Alternative Traffic Operations at Chelsea Road and Cedar Street Intersection AM Peak PM Peak Movement aa (LOS)'''' Movement Dela (LOS) � c Location Appr . Intersection Intersection Left Thru Right Delay(LOS) Left Thru Right Delay/LOS U o NB 9 (A) 14 (B) 4 (A) 16 (C) 18 (C) 8 (A) H Chelsea Rd WB 2 (A) 0 (A) 0 (A) 2 (A) 1 (A) 0 (A) 3 a at Cedar St SB 25 (D) 12 (B) 10 (B) 9 (A) 27 (D) 19 (C) 14 (B) 14 (B) 0 3 3 F" EB 3 (A) i (A) 0 (A) 6 (A) 1 (A) 0 (A) NB 7 (A) 8 (A) 2 (A) 12 (B) 14 (B) 6 (A) 0 Y Chelsea Rd WB 12 (B) 15 (C) 12 (B) 12 (B) 20 (C) 11 (B) 3 at Cedar St SB 15 (C) 10 (B) 6 (A) 10 ( B) 18 (C) 14 (B) 9 (A) 16 (C) EB 9 (A) 20 (C) 4 (A) 12 (B) 15 (C) 7 (A) NB 9 (A) 9 (A) 2 (A) 10 (B) 12 (B) 5 (A) Chelsea Rd WB 11 (B) 14 (B) 10 (B) 11 (B) 16 (B) 10 (B) at Cedar St SB 12 (B) 10 (B) 4 (A) 8 (A) 14 (B) 13 (B) 8 (A) 13 (B) EB 10 (B) 15 (B) 3 (A) 13 (B) 12 (B) 6 (A) Table 6: Protected (2037) Alternative Traffic Operations at Chelsea Road and Cedar Street Intersection AM Peak PM Peak 0 Movement Delay (LOS) Movement Delay (LOS) Location Appr Intersection Intersection U Left Thru Right Delay(LOS) Left Thru Right Delay/LOS a NB 20 (C) 34 (D) 9 (A) 34 (D) 49 (E) 20 (C) � H � Chelsea Rd WB 14 (B) 4 (A) 2 (A) 16 (C) 7 (A) 5 (A)Cu 3 at Cedar St SB 26 (D) 22 (C) 36 (E) 42 (E) 31 (D) 40 (E) 3 F" EB 12 (B) 5 (A) 4 (A) 20 (C) 9 (A) 5 (A) NB 18 (C) 28 (D) 10(B) 28 (D) 40 (E) 17 (C) 0 Y Chelsea Rd WB 24 (C) 20 (C) 16 (C) 26 (D) 24 (C) 18 (C) 3 at Cedar St SB 40 (E) 21 (C) 17(C) �4 C) ( 38 (E) 127 (D) 31 (D) EB 18 (C) 22 (C) 12(B) 29 (D) 31 (D) ( 12 (B) NB 15 (B) 20 (C) 12(B) 19 (B) 26 (C) I 10 (B) Chelsea Rd WB 20 (C) 18 (B) 17 (B) 24 (C) 20 (C) I 16 (B) °j at Cedar St SB 24 (C) 15 (B) 15(B) 18 (B) 30 (C) 24 (C) 120 (C) 22 (C) EB 16 (B) 18(B) 10(B) 26 (C) 22 (C) I 10 (B) Chelsea Road at Cedar Street Intersection Analysis December 18, 2017 Page 7 of 8 Conclusions and Recommendations Based on the existing conditions and alternative improvement analysis the following can be concluded: • All -way stop warrants are met with existing traffic volumes, lane configuration and speed limits. • By adding all -way stop control,the overall intersection LOS would improve slightly from the existing conditions, however all movement issues (LOS D) would be improved to LOS C or better. • The future year analysis shows that the existing two-way stop would be operating at an overall unsatisfactory levels LOS E with movements at LOS E and F. • The future year analysis assuming the proposed alternative improvements show that the existing two-way stop with the addition of turn lanes and all -way stop would not operate at satisfactory levels. The traffic signal system would have an acceptable overall and movement LOS of C or better. • The installation of the additional right turn lanes for eastbound and westbound Chelsea Road and northbound Cedar Street, would improve the operations of the intersection but would not eliminate some of the movement issues. • Over half the reported crashes (six out of nine) are right angle crashes which are correctable with all -way stop control. • Traffic signal control is not warranted at this time with the existing traffic volumes, lane configuration and speed limits. However, the traffic operations would slightly improve over the existing two-way stop or all -way stop control. • A roundabout was considered at this intersection, however because of the unbalanced traffic volumes of each street approach, a traffic signal is recommended as a more feasible alternative to improve traffic operations. With these conclusions, the following is recommended: 1. Change the intersection control to an all -way stop with the installation of stop signs for the Chelsea Road approaches. This can be completed with the Chelsea Road Street and Utility reconstruction project scheduled for 2018. 2. Continue to monitor traffic conditions, specifically the eastbound Chelsea Road approach back-up to TH 25. Should this become an issue consider installation of a traffic signal system. Based on projected growth rates, it is anticipated that the signal will be needed in 2024, however it will depend on the growth in the immediate area as well. 3. With the installation of a traffic signal system include the addition of right turn lanes for eastbound and westbound Chelsea Road and northbound Cedar Street. Chelsea Road at Cedar Street Intersection Analysis December 18, 2017 Pagc 8 of 8 t�1 70 h-- 04 Cu O w ca r1� U /_l»:IzIQ Kq 4 Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Review Feasibility Report Chelsea Road Utility and Street Improvements City of Monticello Project No. 17CO01 WSB Project No. R-010438-000 Wag- Sam lwww� Z*mq REPORT OF GEOTECHNICAL I M 1KNIMA Chelsea Road Pavement Improvements Monticello, Minnesota Date: December 29, 2017 Prepared for: City of Monticello c/o WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Avenue South, Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 AET Report No. 28-01304A December 29, 2017 WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Avenue South, Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Attn: Mr. Ben Bakk RE: Geotechnical Exploration and Review Chelsea Road Pavement Improvements Monticello, Minnesota AET Report No. 28-01304A Dear Mr. Bakk: CONSULTANTS ENVIRONMENTAL GEOTECHNICAL MATERIALS FORENSICS American Engineering Testing, Inc. (AET) is pleased to present the results of our subsurface exploration program and geotechnical engineering review for the Chelsea Road Pavement Improvements project in Monticello, Minnesota. These services were performed according to our proposal to you dated August 2, 2017. We are submitting one electronic copy of the report to you. Additional copies can be provided upon request. Please contact me if you have any questions about the report. Sincerely, American Engineering Testing, Inc. Jacob 0. Michalowski, PE Engineer 11 Phone: (651) 283-2481 jinichalowski awamentest.corn Page i 550 Cleveland Avenue North I Saint Paul, MN 55114 Phone (651) 659-90011(800) 972-6364 1 Fax (651) 659-1379 1 www.amengtest.com I AA/EEO This document shall not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval from American Engineering Testing, Inc. Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Review Chelsea Road Improvements, Monticello, Minnesota December 29, 2017 AET Report No. 28-01304 AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. SIGNATURE PAGE Prepared for: WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Avenue South, Suite 300 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55416 Attn: Mr. Ben Bakk Authored by: r 7 Jacob O. Michalowski, PE Engineer II I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under Minnesota Statute Section 326.02 to 326.15 Name: Jacob O. Michalowski Date: 12/29/17 License #:54188 Copyright 2017 American Engineering Testing, Inc. All Rights Reserved Prepared by: American Engineering Testing, Inc. 550 Cleveland Avenue North St. Paul, Minnesota 55114 (651) 659-9001/www.amengtest.com Reviewed by: Melanie Fiegen, PE Senior Pavement Engineer Unauthorized use or copying of this document is strictlY prohibited hi, anYone other than the client for the .specific project. Page ii Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Review Chelsea Road Improvements, Monticello, Minnesota AMERICAN December 29, 2017 ENGINEERING AET Report No. 28-01304 TESTING, INC. TABLE OF CONTENTS TransmittalLetter............................................................................................................................. i SignaturePage................................................................................................................................ ii TABLEOF CONTENTS............................................................................................................... iii 1.0 INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES............................................................................................................ 1 3.0 PROJECT INFORMATION..................................................................................................... 1 4.0 SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION AND TESTING................................................................ 2 4.1 Field Exploration Program.................................................................................................... 2 4.2 Laboratory Testing................................................................................................................ 2 5.0 SITE CONDITIONS................................................................................................................. 2 5.1 Existing Pavement Section.................................................................................................... 2 5.2 Pavement Subgrade Soils...................................................................................................... 3 5.3 Underlying Soils.................................................................................................................... 3 5.4 Ground Water........................................................................................................................ 3 5.5 Review of Soil Properties...................................................................................................... 4 6.0 Pavement improvement methods.............................................................................................. 4 6.1 Approach Discussion............................................................................................................. 4 6.2 Reclamation........................................................................................................................... 4 6.3 Definitions............................................................................................................................. 5 6.4 Subgrade and Traffic Information......................................................................................... 5 6.5 Section Thickness.................................................................................................................. 5 6.6 Test Rolling........................................................................................................................... 6 6.7 Utility Support and Backfill.................................................................................................. 6 7.0 CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS................................................................................ 7 7.1 Potential Difficulties.............................................................................................................. 7 7.2 Excavation Backsloping........................................................................................................ 8 7.3 Observation and Testing........................................................................................................ 8 8.0 LIMITATIONS......................................................................................................................... 8 Page iii Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Review Chelsea Road Improvements, Monticello, Minnesota December 29, 2017 AET Report No. 28-01304 AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. TABLE OF CONTENTS STANDARD SHEETS — Definitions Relating to Pavement Construction Bedding/Foundation Support of Buried Pipe Utility Excavation Backfilling APPENDIX A — Geotechnical Field Exploration and Testing Boring Log Notes Mn/DOT Textural Soil Classification System AASHTO Soil Classification System Figure 1— Boring Location Map Subsurface Boring Logs Results of Sieve Analysis Tests State Aid 10 Ton ESAL Traffic Forecast MnPAVE Design Summary APPENDIX B — Geotechnical Report Limitations and Guidelines for Use Page iv Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Review Chelsea Road Improvements, Monticello, Minnesota AMERICAN December 29, 2017 ENGINEERING AET Report No. 28-01304 TESTING, INC. 1.0 INTRODUCTION We understand the City of Monticello (the City) is planning the reclamation and resurfacing of Chelsea Road in Monticello, Minnesota. To assist in planning and design, you have authorized American Engineering Testing, Inc. (AET) to conduct a subsurface exploration program at the site, conduct soil laboratory testing, and perform a geotechnical engineering review for the project. This report presents the results of the above services and provides our engineering recommendations based on this data. 2.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES AET's services were performed according to our proposal to you dated August 2, 2017, which you authorized on August 4, 2017. The authorized scope consists of performing the following: • Eight standard penetration test (SPT) borings to a depth of 10 feet. • Soil laboratory testing. • Geotechnical engineering review based on the data and preparation of this report. Two of these borings (B-1 and B-2) were performed for the pavement improvements on Cedar Street. The results and recommendations regarding those borings will be reported separately. These services are intended for geotechnical purposes. The scope is not intended to explore for the presence or extent of environmental contamination. 3.0 PROJECT INFORMATION The City is planning to perform pavement and storm sewer improvements to Chelsea Road, from Thomas Park Drive to approximately 2,900 feet to the east. The planned construction includes full depth reclamation and bituminous surfacing while maintaining the existing width and surface elevation. The storm sewer improvements are planned to be 9 feet deep or less. We understand a recently constructed Fleet Farm has increased the ADT on Chelsea Road from 3,800 in 2016 to 7,900 currently. Chelsea Road will be designed to a 10 -ton roadway. We understand the roadway cannot tolerate any grade increase. Pagel of 8 Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Review Chelsea Road Improvements, Monticello, Minnesota December 29, 2017 AET Report No. 28-01304 AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. The above stated information represents our understanding of the proposed construction. This information is an integral part of our engineering review. It is important that you contact us if there are changes from that described so that we can evaluate whether modifications to our recommendations are appropriate. 4.0 SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION AND TESTING 4.1 Field Exploration Program The subsurface exploration program conducted for the project consisted of six standard penetration test (SPT) borings to a depth of 10 feet. Borings B-3 thru B-6 were performed in the driving lanes of Chelsea Road and B-7 and B-8 were performed in the shoulder of Chelsea Road. The logs of the borings and details of the methods used appear in Appendix A. The logs contain information concerning soil layering, soil classification, geologic description, and moisture condition. Relative density or consistency is also noted for the natural soils, which is based on the standard penetration resistance (N -value). The boring locations were provided to AET by WSB on an aerial imagery map. AET staked the boring locations from the map using existing site features. The boring locations are shown on Figure 1 in Appendix A. 4.2 Laboratory Testing The laboratory test program included moisture content and sieve analysis testing. The test results appear in Appendix A on the individual boring logs adjacent to the samples upon which they were performed, or on the data sheets following the logs. The laboratory testing methods are described in further detail in Appendix A. 5.0 SITE CONDITIONS 5.1 Existing Pavement Section The existing section of the roadway consists of bituminous pavement over apparent aggregate base. A summary of the bituminous pavement and apparent aggregate base thicknesses is shown in Table 1. The bituminous thickness was measured to the nearest 1/4 inch and the apparent aggregate base was measured to the nearest 1/2 inch. Page 2 of 8 Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Review Chelsea Road Improvements, Monticello, Minnesota December 29, 2017 AET Report No. 28-01304 Table 1. Chelsea Road Pavement Thickness Summary. AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. Each of the borings encountered apparent aggregate base material classified as loamy sand and gravelly loamy sand (A -1-b) immediately below the bituminous pavement except for B-7 which encountered slightly plastic sandy loam (A -1-b). 5.2 Pavement Subgrade Soils The subgrade soils encountered at the borings performed on Chelsea Avenue consisted of gravelly loamy sand (A -1-b), loamy sand (A -1-b), and sand (A -1-b). 5.3 Underlying Soils The major soils underlying the subgrade consisted of sand (A -1-b) and loamy sand (A -1-b) with varying amounts of gravel on each of the roadways. These soils were considered alluvium or possible fill. Slightly plastic sandy loam (A -1-b) was encountered in boring B-7 from the bottom of the bituminous pavement to a depth of 4 feet. 5.4 Groundwater There was no groundwater observed in any of the borings at the time of drilling. Groundwater levels fluctuate due to varying seasonal and annual rainfall and snow melt amounts, as well as other factors. Page 3 of 8 Apparent Aggregate Boring Asphalt (in) Base (in) Total (in) B-3 5 3/4 8 131/4 B-4 6 18 24 B-5 6 9 '/2 151/2 B-6 6 12 18 B-7 6 NA NA B-8 6 9 15 NA -No apparent aggregate base was measured in this boring. AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. Each of the borings encountered apparent aggregate base material classified as loamy sand and gravelly loamy sand (A -1-b) immediately below the bituminous pavement except for B-7 which encountered slightly plastic sandy loam (A -1-b). 5.2 Pavement Subgrade Soils The subgrade soils encountered at the borings performed on Chelsea Avenue consisted of gravelly loamy sand (A -1-b), loamy sand (A -1-b), and sand (A -1-b). 5.3 Underlying Soils The major soils underlying the subgrade consisted of sand (A -1-b) and loamy sand (A -1-b) with varying amounts of gravel on each of the roadways. These soils were considered alluvium or possible fill. Slightly plastic sandy loam (A -1-b) was encountered in boring B-7 from the bottom of the bituminous pavement to a depth of 4 feet. 5.4 Groundwater There was no groundwater observed in any of the borings at the time of drilling. Groundwater levels fluctuate due to varying seasonal and annual rainfall and snow melt amounts, as well as other factors. Page 3 of 8 Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Review Chelsea Road Improvements, Monticello, Minnesota AMERICAN December 29, 2017 ENGINEERING AET Report No. 28-01304 TESTING, INC. 5.5 Review of Soil Properties High strength and stability is needed from the upper portion of the subgrade to resist yielding from wheel loads. Although load intensity dissipates with depth, the more critical portion requiring the high strength for wheel load resistance is normally considered the upper three feet of the subgrade. The A -1-b subgrade soils encountered in our borings generally have high strength and stability for pavement support. 6.0 PAVEMENT IMPROVEMENT METHODS 6.1 Approach Discussion The bituminous pavement thicknesses and aggregate base material types encountered at the boring locations will be suitable for reclamation. The existing bituminous pavement thickness is an average of 6 inches which will allow reclamation to be performed to a depth of 12 -inches, while leaving in place a minimum of approximately 2 inches of existing aggregate base. There will be sufficient remaining reclaim material after removing the required amount for the placement of the new bituminous surfacing. The pavement section thickness design will be evaluated using MnDOT's MnPAVE Flexible Design Software. 6.2 Reclamation Full -depth reclamation involves crushing both the bituminous and at least a portion of the aggregate base layer in-place and blending the material with the intent of creating a recycled aggregate base. A fresh bituminous surface is then placed over the reclaimed material. This approach removes the distresses in the bituminous layer which will eliminate reflective cracking. Full -depth pavement reclamation can be either non -stabilized or stabilized. In stabilized reclamation, emulsified asphalt or cement is added to the reclaimed material, which stabilizes and improves the reclaimed aggregate base and allows for thinner bituminous surfacing. These processes require that appropriate material types and thicknesses be in-place. These methods also require pavement cores and larger, more representative samples of aggregate base be collected for proper evaluation and mix design. If this method is being considered, we can be contacted for additional consultation. Page 4 of 8 Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Review Chelsea Road Improvements, Monticello, Minnesota AMERICAN December 29, 2017 ENGINEERING AET Report No. 28-01304 TESTING, INC. 6.3 Definitions Please refer to the attached standard sheet entitled "Definitions Relating to Pavement Construction" and "Bituminous Pavement Subgrade Preparation and Design" for definitions and more information related to pavement construction. 6.4 Subgrade and Traffic Information We used the soils encountered in each of the soil borings at the anticipated subgrade elevation and MnDOT design guides to estimate a design R -value to be used in conjunction with the MnPAVE design software and Soil Factor design. These estimates are based on Table 5-3.3(a) and 5-3.3(b) within the MnDOT Pavement Manual (2007) and on our experience. The design R - values and traffic information used in the pavement evaluation are shown below in Table 2. Typical R -values for A -1-b material in a reworked condition according to MnDOT Specification 2105 and pass test rolling according to MnDOT Specification 2111 are 70. Due to not knowing how the subgrade was constructed we reduced the design R -value to 30. If the subgrade soil is exposed, reworked and recompacted the design R -value can be increased to 70 and the Soil Factor to 50. Table 2. Design R -value and Traffic Information. Roadway Location Soil Design R- Traffic Boring value/Soil Factor Information Chelsea Road Thompson Park Drive B-3 thru 30 7,900 ADT in 2017, to 2,900 feet east B-8 3.0% growth Chelsea Road was reported to have an ADT of 3,800 in 2016, however a new Fleet Farm was built nearby which increased the ADT to 7,900 in 2017. We applied a 3.0% growth factor along with an urban traffic distribution to estimate the 20 -year design ESALs to be 968,000. 6.5 Section Thickness The section thickness design for the roadway was evaluated using MnDOT's MnPAVE Flexible Design Software for a 10 -ton design. The following finished section was evaluated: Page 5 of 8 Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Review Chelsea Road Improvements, Monticello, Minnesota December 29, 2017 AET Report No. 28-01304 Chelsea Road 1.5 inches SPWEA440C 1.5 inches SPWEA440C 2 inches SPNWB430B 7 inches FDR 2 inches in-place aggregate base R -value =30 (A -1-b) Subgrade The MnPAVE Design summary is attached to this report. AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. The existing pavement section should be reclaimed to a depth of 12 inches. The reclaiming operations should follow the provisions of MnDOT Specification 2215.B, which should result in a final product that can be used in place of aggregate base. After reclaiming, the grade should be trimmed and compacted to allow the placement of 5 -inches of bituminous pavement and to promote positive drainage. 6.6 Test Rolling The final reclaimed aggregate base layer for the FDR approach should have proper stability prior to paving. We recommend test rolling the final compacted reclaimed layer in accordance with MnDOT Specification 2111. If unstable material is encountered during the test roll process, then these soils should be improved by means of scarification, drying, and recompaction, or by subcutting and replacement with suitable material. 6.7 Utility Support and Backfill Where storm sewer utility installation or replacement takes place, we recommend trenching, installation and backfilling is perfonned prior to final base layer preparation. Based on the conditions encountered at the boring locations, most of the soils present should provide adequate support for utility construction. A 4 -inch thick Granular Bedding (MnDOT Specification 3149.2F) layer may be needed in some areas, however the sand and loamy sand materials encountered at the anticipated utility elevations should provide adequate uniform support beneath and around the pipes. Utility backfill soils should be placed in lifts of thicknesses appropriate to the compaction Page 6 of 8 Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Review Chelsea Road Improvements, Monticello, Minnesota December 29, 2017 AET Report No. 28-01304 AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. equipment used and the soil being compacted. We recommend trench backfill placed within 3 feet of the bottom of the aggregate base layer be compacted to a minimum of 100% of the Standard Proctor maximum dry density. The remaining utility trench backfill can have a reduced minimum compaction level of 95% of the Standard Proctor density. Please see the following standard data sheets for additional recommendations on utility bedding and backfilling: "Bedding/Foundation Support of Buried Pipe: and "Standard Recommendations for Utility Trench Backfilling". 7.0 CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS 7.1 Potential Difficulties 7 1.1 Water in Excavation Water can be expected to collect in the excavation bottoms during times of inclement weather or snow melt. To allow observation of the excavation bottoms, to reduce the potential for soil disturbance, and to facilitate filling operations, we recommend water be removed from within the excavations during construction. 7.1.2 Wet or Dry Soils The materials excavated may be wet or dry of the "optimum" condition, making proper compaction of those materials as new engineered fill not possible unless they are mechanically moisture conditioned to near the standard optimum water content. 7.1.3 Disturbance of Soils The on-site soils can become disturbed under construction traffic, especially if the soils are wet. If soils become disturbed, they should be subcut to the underlying undisturbed soils. The subcut soils can then be dried and recompacted back into place, or they should be removed and replaced with drier imported fill. The instability of soils beneath the soil layer being reworked and compacted may limit the ability to compact the upper soils. In this case, greater depths of subcutting and stability improvement may be needed. Page 7 of 8 Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Review Chelsea Road Improvements, Monticello, Minnesota December 29, 2017 AET Report No. 28-01304 AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. Trench bottom instability could result if the utility trenches approach the ground water level. This may require dewatering prior to trenching or the use of coarser bedding materials. 7.1.4 Cobbles and Boulders The coarse alluvial and fill soils at this site can include cobbles and boulders. This may snake excavating procedures somewhat more difficult than normal if they are encountered. 7.2 Excavation Backsloping If excavation faces are not retained, the excavations should maintain maximum allowable slopes in accordance with OSHA Regulations (Standards 29 CFR), Part 1926, Subpart P, "Excavations" (can be found on www.osha.�zov). Even with the required OSHA sloping, water seepage or surface runoff can potentially induce sideslope erosion or running which could require slope maintenance. Maintaining excavation face slopes in accordance with OSHA requirements should be the responsibility of the contractor, and we recommend the construction documents be prepared as such. 7.3 Observation and Testing The recommendations in this report are based on the subsurface conditions found at our test boring locations. Since the soil conditions can be expected to vary away from the soil boring locations, we recommend on-site observation by a geotechnical engineer/technician during construction to evaluate these potential changes. Soil density and Proctor testing should also be perfonned on new fill placed in order to document that project specifications for compaction have been satisfied. 8.0 LIMITATIONS Within the limitations of scope, budget, and schedule, we have endeavored to provide our services according to generally accepted geotechnical engineering practices at this time and location. Other than this, no warranty, either expressed or implied, is intended. Important information regarding risk management and proper use of this report is given in Appendix B entitled "Geotechnical Report Limitations and Guidelines for Use". Page 8 of 8 Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Review Chelsea Road Improvements, Monticello, Minnesota December 29, 2017 AET Report No. 28-01304 AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. Standard Sheets Definitions Relating to Pavement Construction Bedding/Foundation Support of Buried Pipe Utility Excavation and Backfilling DEFINITIONS RELATING TO PAVEMENT CONSTRUCTION TOP OF SUBGRADE Grade which contacts the bottom of the aggregate base layer. SAND SUBBASE Uniform thickness sand layer placed as the top of subgrade which is intended to improve the frost and drainage characteristics of the pavement system by better draining excess water in the base/subbase, by reducing and "bridging" frost heaving and by reducing spring thaw weakening effects. CRITICAL SUBGRADE ZONE The subgrade portion beneath and within three vertical feet of the top of subgrade. A sand subbase, if placed, would be considered the upper portion of the critical subgrade zone. GRANULAR BORROW Soils meeting Mn/DOT Specification 3149.2131. This refers to granular soils which, of the portion passing the l" sieve, contain less than 20% by weight passing the #200 sieve. SELECT GRANULAR BORROW Soils meeting Mn/DOT Specification 3149.2B2. This refers to granular soils which, of the portion passing the V sieve, contain less than 12% by weight passing the #200 sieve. MODIFIED SELECT GRANULAR BORROW Clean, medium grained sands which, of the portion passing the 1 " sieve, contain less than 5% by weight passing the #200 sieve and less than 40% by weight passing the #40 sieve. GEOTEXTILE STABILIZATION FABRIC Geotextile meeting Type V requirements defined in Mn/DOT Specification 3733. When using fabric, installation should also meet the requirements outlined in Mn/DOT Specification 3733. COMPACTION SUBCUT Construction of a uniform thickness subcut below a designated grade to provide uniformity and compaction within the subcut zone. Replacement fill can be the materials subcut, although the reused soils should be blended to a uniform soil condition and recompacted per the Specified Density Method (Mn/DOT Specification 2105.3F1). TEST ROLL A means of evaluating the near -surface stability of subgrade soils (usually non -granular). Suitability is determined by the depth of rutting or deflection caused by passage of heavy rubber -tired construction equipment, such as a loaded dump truck, over the test area. Yielding of less than 1" is normally considered acceptable, although engineering judgment may be applied depending on equipment used, soil conditions present, and/or pavement performance expectations. UNSTABLE SOILS Subgrade soils which do not pass a test roll. Unstable soils typically have water content exceeding the "standard optimum water content" defined in ASTM: D698 (Standard Proctor test). ORGANIC SOILS Soils which have sufficient organic content such that engineering properties/stability are affected. These soils are usually black to dark brown in color. 01REPO 19 (12/08) AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. BEDDING/FOUNDATION SUPPORT OF BURIED PIPE GENERAL This page addresses soil bedding and foundation support of rigid pipe, such as reinforced concrete, and flexible pipe, such as steel and plastic. This does not address selection of pipe based on loads and allowable deflections, but rather addresses the geotechnical/soil aspects of uniform pipe support. Bedding/foundation support needs relate to local conditions directly beneath and to the sides of the pipe zone, which may be influenced by soft in-situ ground conditions or by soil disturbance due to soil sensitivity or ground water. Bedding relates to granular materials placed directly beneath the bottom of the pipe (usually 4" to 6" thick), which is intended to provide increased support uniformity. We refer to foundation soils as thicker layers of sands and/or gravels (beneath the bedding zone) intended to provide increased foundation strength support, usually needed due to soft, unstable and/or waterbearing conditions. GRANULAR BEDDING With circular pipes, high local loads (approaching point loads) develop if pipes are placed on hard surfaces. Load distribution is improved by placing granular bedding materials beneath the pipe, which are either shaped to match the pipe bottom or are placed without compaction to allow "settling in." The bedding should be placed in such a manner that the pipe will be at the proper elevation and slope when the pipe is laid on the bedding. Common bedding material is defined in Mn/DOT Specification 3149.2F, Granular Bedding. Published documents recommend rigid pipes having a diameter of 12" to 54" be placed on a bedding thickness of 4", which increases to 6" of bedding for pipe diameters ranging from 54" to 72". Beyond a 72" diameter, the bedding thickness can be equal to the pipe outside diameter divided by 12. Typically, the need for bedding under small diameter pipes (less than 12") depends on the pipe designer's specific needs, although in obvious point loads situations (bedrock, cobbles, significant coarse gravel content), bedding is recommended. Note that bedding should also account for larger diameter bells at joints. FOUNDATION FILL Positive uniform strength is usually compromised in soft or unstable trench bottom conditions. In this case, deeper subcuts and foundation fill placement is needed beneath the pipe. In moderate instability conditions, improvement can likely be accomplished with a thicker bedding layer. However, in more significant instability situations, particularly where ground water is present, coarser materials may be needed to provide a stronger foundation. Thicker gravel layers can also be a favorable media from which to dewater. The following materials would be appropriate for stability improvement, with the coarser materials being appropriate for higher instability/ground water cases. • Fine Filter Aggregate — Mn/DOT Specification 3149.2) • Coarse Filter Aggregate —Mn/DOT Specification 3149.2H When using a coarser material which includes significant void space, we highly recommend enveloping the entire gravel layer within a geotextile fabric. The gravel material includes open void space, and the fabric acts as a separator which minimizes the intrusion of fines into the open void space. If additional granular bedding sand is used above foundation gravel, the fabric would also prevent downward infiltration of bedding sand into the rock void space. Although it is preferred to not highly compact thin granular bedding zones directly beneath the pipe center, it is desirable to compact the foundation materials to prevent more significant pipe settlement. We recommend foundation fill be compacted to a minimum of 95% of the Standard Proctor density (ASTM: D698). It is not possible to test coarse rock fill, although this material should still be well compacted/ tamped. Often, pipes entering structures such as catch basins, lift stations, etc., enter the structure at a higher elevation than the structure bottom, and are therefore placed on the structure backfill. Fill beneath these pipes should be considered foundation fill. Depending on the flexibility of the connection design, it may be necessary to increase the minimum compaction level to reduce differential settlements, particularly with thicker fills. SIDE FILL SUPPORT If the pipe designer requires support from the side fill, granular bedding should also be placed along the sides of the pipe. In poor soil conditions, the sand fill may need to be placed laterally up to two pipe diameters on both sides of the pipe. With rigid pipe, compacted sand placement up to the spring line (within the haunch area) is usually sufficient. With flexible pipe, side fill should be placed and compacted at least to the top of the pipe. For positive support, it is very important to properly compact the sands within the haunch area. OIREP017 (12/08) AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. STANDARD RECOMMENDATIONS FOR UTILITY TRENCH BACKFILLING GENERAL Clayey and silty soils are often difficult to compact, as they may be naturally wet or may become wet due to ground water or surface/rain water during construction. Soils will need to be placed within a certain range of water (moisture) content to attain desired compaction levels. Moisture conditioning to within this range can be time consuming, labor intensive, and requires favorable weather. The degree of compaction and the soil type used for backfill within open cut utility trenches depends on the function of the overlying land surface. Details are as follows: ROADWAYS Where trenches are located below roadways, we recommend using inorganic fill and compacting these soils per Mn/DOT Specification 2105.3F1 (Specified Density Method). This specification requires 100% of the Standard Proctor density in the upper one meter subgrade zone, and 95% below this. Note that this specification includes moisture content range requirements which are important for proper subgrade stability. Where available soils are wet or of poor quality, it may be possible to use the "Quality Compaction Method" (Mn/DOT Specification 2105.3F2) for soils below the upper one meter subgrade zone if you can tolerate some subsidence. However, a high level of stability is still important within the upper subgrade zone and recommend that the "Specified Density Method" be used in this upper subgrade area. We caution that if backfill soils in the lower trench area are significantly unstable, it may be difficult or even impossible to properly compact soils within the upper one meter subgrade zone. In this case, placing a geotextile fabric directly over the unstable soils can aid in offsetting the instability. STRUCTURAL AREAS If fill is placed beneath or within the significant zone of influence of a structure (typically a 1:1 lateral oversize zone), the soil type and minimum compaction level will need to be evaluated on an individual basis. Because trenches result in variable fill depths over a short lateral distance, higher than normal compaction levels and/or more favorable (sandy) soil fill types may be needed. If this situation exists, it is important that special geotechnical engineering review be performed. NON-STRUCTURAL AREAS In grass/ditch areas, backfill soils should be placed in reasonable lift thicknesses and compacted to a minimum of 90% of the Standard Proctor density (ASTM: D698) and/or per the Mn/DOT "Quality Compaction Method." If lower compaction levels are attained, more noticeable subsidence at the surface can occur. Steep or high slopes require special consideration. 01 REPO 18 (12/08) AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Review Chelsea Road Improvements, Monticello, Minnesota December 29, 2017 AET Report No. 28-01304 AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. Geotechnical Field Exploration and Testing Boring Log Notes Mn/DOT Textural Classification System AASHTO Soil Classification System Figure 1 — Boring Location Map Subsurface Boring Logs Results of Sieve Analysis Tests State Aid 10 Ton ESAL Traffic Forecast MnPAVE Design Summary Appendix A Geotechnical Field Exploration and Testing AET Report No. 28-01304A IW@ 1110111oil x:49rM_ME% 111101 The subsurface conditions at the site were explored by drilling and sampling six (6) standard penetration test borings. The locations of the borings appear on Figure 1. A.2 SAMPLING METHODS A.2.1 Split -Spoon Samples (SS) - Calibrated to N60 Values Standard penetration (split -spoon) samples were collected in general accordance with ASTM: D1586 with one primary modification. The ASTM test method consists of driving a 2 -inch O.D. split -barrel sampler into the in-situ soil with a 140 -pound hammer dropped from a height of 30 inches. The sampler is driven a total of 18 inches into the soil. After an initial set of 6 inches, the number of hammer blows to drive the sampler the final 12 inches is known as the standard penetration resistance or N -value. Our method uses a modified hammer weight, which is determined by measuring the system energy using a Pile Driving Analyzer (PDA) and an instrumented rod. In the past, standard penetration N -value tests were performed using a rope and cathead for the lift and drop system. The energy transferred to the split -spoon sampler was typically limited to about 60% of its potential energy due to the friction inherent in this system. This converted energy then provides what is known as an N6o blow count. The most recent drill rigs incorporate an automatic hammer lift and drop system, which has higher energy efficiency and subsequently results in lower N -values than the traditional N60 values. By using the PDA energy measurement equipment, we are able to determine actual energy generated by the drop hammer. With the various hammer systems available, we have found highly variable energies ranging from 55% to over 100%. Therefore, the intent of AET's hammer calibrations is to vary the hammer weight such that hammer energies lie within about 60% to 65% of the theoretical energy of a 140 -pound weight falling 30 inches. The current ASTM procedure acknowledges the wide variation in N -values, stating that N -values of 100% or more have been observed. Although we have not yet determined the statistical measurement uncertainty of our calibrated method to date, we can state that the accuracy deviation of the N -values using this method is significantly better than the standard ASTM Method. A.2.2 Disturbed Samples (DS)/Spin-up Samples (SU) Sample types described as "DS" or "SU" on the boring logs are disturbed samples, which are taken from the flights of the auger. Because the auger disturbs the samples, possible soil layering and contact depths should be considered approximate. A.2.3 Sampling Limitations Unless actually observed in a sample, contacts between soil layers are estimated based on the spacing of samples and the action of drilling tools. Cobbles, boulders, and other large objects generally cannot be recovered from test borings, and they may be present in the ground even if they are not noted on the boring logs. Determining the thickness of "topsoil" layers is usually limited, due to variations in topsoil definition, sample recovery, and other factors. Visual -manual description often relies on color for determination, and transitioning changes can account for significant variation in thickness judgment. Accordingly, the topsoil thickness presented on the logs should not be the sole basis for calculating topsoil stripping depths and volumes. If more accurate information is needed relating to thickness and topsoil quality definition, alternate methods of sample retrieval and testing should be employed. A.3 CLASSIFICATION METHODS Soil descriptions shown on the boring logs are based on the MnDOT Textural Soil Classification system. The MnDOT classification system is described in the MnDOT Grading and Base Manual. Where laboratory classification (sieve analysis or Atterberg Limits) have been performed, accurate classifications are possible. Otherwise, soil descriptions shown on the boring logs are visual -manual judgments. Charts are attached which provide information on the system, the descriptive terminology, and the symbols used on the boring logs. Visual -manual judgment of the AASHTO Soil Group is also noted as a part of the soil description. A chart presenting details of the AASHTO Soil Classification System is also attached. Appendix A - Page 1 of 2 AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. Appendix A Geotechnical Field Exploration and Testing AET Report No. 28-01304A The boring logs include descriptions of apparent geology. The geologic depositional origin of each soil layer is interpreted primarily by observation of the soil samples, which can be limited. Observations of the surrounding topography, vegetation, and development can sometimes aid this judgment. A.4 WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS The ground water level measurements are shown at the bottom of the boring logs. The following information appears under "Water Level Measurements" on the logs: • Date and Time of measurement • Sampled Depth: lowest depth of soil sampling at the time of measurement • Casing Depth: depth to bottom of casing or hollow -stem auger at time of measurement • Cave-in Depth: depth at which measuring tape stops in the borehole • Water Level: depth in the borehole where free water is encountered • Drilling Fluid Level: same as Water Level, except that the liquid in the borehole is drilling fluid The true location of the water table at the boring locations may be different than the water levels measured in the boreholes. This is possible because there are several factors that can affect the water level measurements in the borehole. Some of these factors include: permeability of each soil layer in profile, presence of perched water, amount of time between water level readings, presence of drilling fluid, weather conditions, and use of borehole casing. A.5 LABORATORY TEST METHODS A.5.1 Water Content Tests Conducted per AET Procedure 01 -LAB -010, which is performed in general accordance with ASTM: D2216 and AASHTO: T265. A.5.2 Sieve Analysis of Soils (thru #200 Sieve) Conducted per AET Procedure 01 -LAB -040, which is performed in general conformance with ASTM: D6913, Method A. A.6 TEST STANDARD LIMITATIONS Field and laboratory testing is done in general conformance with the described procedures. Compliance with any other standards referenced within the specified standard is neither inferred nor implied. A.7 SAMPLE STORAGE Unless notified to do otherwise, we routinely retain representative samples of the soils recovered from the borings for a period of 30 days. Appendix A - Page 2 of 2 AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. �NNESp lq�Minnesota Department of Transportation— , (Ge®technics 1 Section ��. � �� 14, 5Q°� BoringLo Descriptive Terminology (English Units)UnoXo o OF TRPS 9 P USER NOTES, ABBREVIATIONS AND DEFINITIONS - Additional information available in Geotechnical Manual. This boring was made by ordinary and conventional t WR ........ Weight of Rod RELATIVE DENSITY AC ........... methods and with care deemed adequate for the Mud ....... Drilling Fluids in Sample Compactness - Granular Soils BPF Department's design purposes. Since this boring CS ......... Continuous Sample very loose ................ 0-4 was not taken to gather information relating to the w/AUG ....... loose .................... 5-10 construction of the project, the data noted in the SOIL/CORE TESTS medium dense ............ 11-24 Feld and recorded may not necessarily be the same SPT N., ..... ASTM D1586 Modified dense ................... 25-50 as that which a contractor would desire. While the Blows per foot with 140 Ib. hammer and a very dense ............... >50 Department believes that the information as to the standard energy of 210 ft -lbs. This energy conditions and materials reported is accurate, it represents 60% of the potential energy of the Consistencv - Cohesive Soils BPF does not warrant that the information is necessarily system and is the average energy provided by very soft ................. 0-1 complete. This information has been edited or a Rope & Cathead system. soft ..................... 2-4 abridged and may not reveal all the information MC ........ Moisture Content firm ..................... 5-8 which might be useful or of interest to the COH ....... Cohesion stiff ..................... 9-15 contractor. Consequently, the Department will make7 .......... Sample Density very stiff ................. 16-30 available at its offices, the field logs relating to this LL ......... Liquid Limit hard ..................... 31-60 boring. PI ......... Plasticity Index very hard ................. > 60 Since subsurface conditions outside each borehole F .......... Phi Angle REC ....... Percent Core Recovered COLOR are unknown, and soil, rock and water conditions RQD ....... Rock Quality Description bilk ....... Black wht .... White cannot be relied upon to be consistent or uniform, p (Percent of total core interval consisting of grin ....... Green .... Brown no warrant is made that conditions adjacent to this unbroken pieces 4 inches or longer) ornyelg ...... Orange yel ..... Yellow boring will necessarily be the same as or similar to ACL ....... Average Core Length dk ........ Dark It ...... Light those shown on this to Furthermore, the g' (Average length of core that is greater than 4 IOS ....... Iron Oxide Stained Department will not be responsible for any inches long) interpretations, ro, assumptions, projections or P P J Core Breaks Number of natural core GRAIN SIZE /PLASTICITY interpolations made by contractors, or other users of h' I . breaks per 2 -foot interval. VF ..... Very Fine r pI ..... Plastic IS og. Water levels recorded on this log should be used with discretion since the use of drilling fluids in borings may seriously distort the true field conditions. Also, water levels in cohesive soils often take extended periods of time to reach equilibrium and thus reflect their true field level. Water levels can be expected to vary both seasonally and yearly. The absence of notations on this log regarding water does not necessarily mean that this boring was dry or that the contractor will not encounter subsurface water during the course of construction. WATER MEASUREMENT AB ........... After Bailing AC ........... After Completion AF ........... After Flushing w/C .......... with Casing w/M .......... with Mud WSD ......... While Sampling/Drilling w/AUG ....... with Hollow Stem Auger MISCELLANEOUS NA ........... Not Applicable wl ........... with w/o .......... with out sat .......... saturated DRILLING OPERATIONS AUG ....... Augered CD ........ Core Drilled DBD ....... Disturbed by Drilling DBJ ........ Disturbed by Jetting PD ......... Plug Drilled ST ......... Split Tube (SPT test) TW ........ Thinwall (Shelby Tube) WS ........ Wash Sample NSR ....... No Sample Retrieved WH ........ Weight of Hammer Index Sheet No. 3.0 July 1997 DISCONTINUITY SPACING Fine slpl ... Fractures Distance Bedding Very Close .. <2 inches ..... Very Thin Close ....... 2-12 inches ... Thin Mod. Close .. 12-36 inches .. Medium Wide ....... >36 inches .... Thick h]Sol I1410Ee�yY�Ye7[.� F ...... Fine slpl ... Slightly Cr ..... Coarse Plastic SOIL/ROCK TERMS C ...... Clay Lmst .. Limestone L ...... Loam Sst .... Sandstone S ...... Sand Dolo .. Dolostone Si ..... Silt wx .... weathered G ...... Gravel (No. 10 Sieve to 3 inches) Bldr ... Boulder (over 3 inches) T ...... till (unsorted, nonstratified glacial deposits) Mn/DOT TRIANGULAR TEXTURAL Vane Shear Test CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM CLAY WS Washed Sample 100°% Collected during plug drilling ro--90 Augered 80 PD Plug Drilled \ / (Rotary drilled with fluid) to 70 Slit Tube Sample -o \ /_ \ /_ S.RT N_ with 2 in split tube 4 — 60 with liners)�__ 50� Thin Wall Sample o (3 Inch Thin Wall Tube)/� ��- 60 — / 40 Core Drilled (NV Core Barrel, unless / \ / \/ \ \% otherwise noted) / 30 S Continuous Soil Sample 20 A/P Augered and Plug Drilled �Skl�-/ /rg tJet Jettedy�c)/tx AM Augered and Jetted 7 0. ,moo * �o ao 00 00 SILT AASHTO SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF STATE HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION OFFICIALS Classification of Soils and Soil -Aggregate Mixtures Granular Materials Silt -Clay Materials General Classification (35% or less passing No. 200 sieve) (More than 35% passing No. 200 sieve) A-1 A-2 A-7 Group Classification A-7-5 A -1-a A -1-b A-3 A-2-4 A-2-5 A-2-6 A-2-7 A-4 A-5 A-6 A-7-6 Sieve Analysis, Percent passing No. 10(2.00 mm) .............................. 50 max. .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... No. 40 (0.425 mm) ............................. 30 max. 50 max. 51 min. .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... No. 200 (0.075 mm) ............................. 15 max. 25 max. 10 max. 35 max. 35 max. 35 max. 35 max. 36 min. 36 min. 36 min. 36 min. Characteristics of Fraction Passing No. 40 (0.425 mm) Liquid limit ..................................... .... .... 40 max. 41 min. 40 max. 41 min. 40 max. 41 min. 40 max. 41 min. Plasticity index ................................. 6 max. N.P. 10 max. 10 max. 11 min. 11 min. 10 max. 10 max. 11 min. 11 min. Stone Fragments, Fine Usual Types of Significant Constituent Materials Silty or Clayey Gravel and Sand Silty Soils Clayey Soils Gravel and Sand Sand (General Ratings as Subgrade ...................... Excellent to Good Fair to Poor The placing of A-3 before A-2 is necessary in the "left to right elimination process" and does not indicate superiority of A-3 over A-2. Plasticity index of A-7-5 subgroup is equal to or less than LL minus 30. Plasticity index of A-7-6 subgroup is greater than LL minus 30. Group A-8 soils are organic clays or peat with organic content >5%. PLASTICITY INDEX (PI) GROUP INDEX CHART 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 50-- Group Index (GI) = (F-35) [0.2+0.005 (LL -40) ] + 0.01 (F-15) —1 100 _ (PI -10) where F = % Passing No. 200 sieve, LL = Liquid - Limit, and PI = Plasticity Index. = 20 N 90 —_ When working with A-2-6 and A-2-7 subgroups - _ the Partial Group Index (PGI) is determined from the = 19N PI only. = \y 80 Q� 40— When the combined Partial Group Indices are negative, the Group Index should be reported as zero. =35A UP 70 _ f-40 60 _ 30 - `- —50 I� 50 A-5 A-7 40 i a r�A� �4 = 60 20— QY N C _ 30 A-4 A-6 - G 70 v — 20 p = _ t� _ 80 10 Liquid Limit and Plasticity Index Ranges for the 10— o° - A-4, A-5, A-6 and A-7 Subgroups _ Definitions of Gravel. Sand and Silt-Clav -:--go The terms "gravel", "coarse sand", "fine sand" and "silt -clay", as determinable from the minimum test data required in this classification arrangement and as used in subsequent word descriptions are defined as follows: o cb _ —100 GRAVEL - Material passing sieve with 3 -in. square openings and retained on the — No. 10 sieve. Cc _ Example: Tom: COARSE SAND - Material passing the No. 10 sieve and retained on the No. 40 82% Passing No. 200 sieve PGI = 8.9 for LL sieve. - LL= 38 PGI = 7_4 for PI ry - PI=21 GI=16 FINE SAND - Material passing the No. 40 sieve and retained on the No. 200 sieve. _ COMBINED SILT AND CLAY - Material passing the No. 200 sieve BOULDERS (retained (retained on 3-m. sieve) should be excluded from the portion of the sample to which the classification is applied, but the percentage of such material, if any, in the sample should be recorded. The term "silty" is applied to fine material having plasticity index of 10 or less and the term "clayey' is applied to fine material having plasticity index of 11 or greater. 01 CLS022 (07/11) AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. a% -,ALL' As Shown OKA W lr DY JM l.,riL" 1.1�L" L 15 Y MF FIGURE I AMERICAN AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. - Mn/DOT TEMPLATE ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. SUBSURFACE BORING LOG UNIQUE NUMBER U.S. Customary Units State Project Bridge No. or Job Desc. Trunk Highway/Location Boring No. Ground Elevation Monticello, MN 13 (Surveyed) Location Chelsea Road Drill Machine 41C SHEET 1 of 1 Hennepin Co. Coordinate: X= Y= (ft.) Hammer CME Automatic Calibrated Drilling 8/16/17 P Comnleted Latitude (North)= Longitude (West)= SPT MC COH Y— Other Tests Depth o Nso::>:<:<>:<</:::;::: (PSfl(pDfl..... C'03 Or Remarks fC>f�'F`' w w :.............. ::...:..:......... ................:x Formation` Classification tor Member uElev. o 0.5 5.75" Bituminous pavement 6 1.2 GRAVELLY LOAMY SAND, dark brown, damp, A-1-b, fill 21 – 2.0 GRAVELLY LOAMY SAND, grayish brown, damp, A-1-b, fill X 5 27 – 5 5- 26 5 LOAMY SAND, brown, damp, medium dense, A-1-b, alluvium or fill 19 – 6 10— — 19 6 11.5 Bottom of Hole - 11.5' ------------------------------------------------------------- Index Sheet Code Soil Class: Rock Class: Edit: Date: 9/22117 X101-GEO101-GEO FOLDERSIGINTIMI GINT PROJECTW6-01304 (MNDOT FORMA T-AE7). GPJ AMERICAN AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. - Mn/DOT TEMPLATE ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. SUBSURFACE BORING LOG UNIQUE NUMBER U.S. Customary Units State Project Bridge No. or Job Desc. Trunk Highway/Location Boring No. Ground Elevation Monticello, MN 4 (Surveyed) Location Chelsea Road Drill Machine 41C SHEET 1 of 1 Hennepin Co. Coordinate: X= Y= (ft.) Hammer CME Automatic Calibrated Drilling 8/16/17 p I Completed Latitude (North)= Longitude (West)= SPT MC COH Y _ Other Tests Depth N60 (Y-) (Pst) (pct) Co/)Or Remarks Formation Elev. Classification o $ 1': � or Member :... 0.5 6" Bituminous pavement GRAVELLY LOAMY SAND, a little plastic sandy loam, dark 17 – 7 brown, a little brown, damp, A -1-b, fill 2.0 _ 16 – 9 5— LOAMY SAND, a little sand, moist, A -1-b, fill 5 7 13 8.0 8 – 3 SAND, light grayish brown, damp, loose to medium dense, 10— A -1-b, alluvium or fill — 13 9 11.5 Bottom of Hole - 11.5' ------------------------------------------------------------- Index Sheet Code Soil Class: Rock Class: Edit: Date: 9/22117 X:101-GE0101-GEO FOLDERSIGINTw11 GINT PROJECTSM-01304 (MNDOT FORMAT-AET).GPJ AMERICAN AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. - Mn/DOT TEMPLATE ENGINEERING � TESTING, INC. SUBSURFACE BORING LOG UNIQUE NUMBER U.S. Customary Units State Project ( Bridge No. or Job Desc. Trunk Highway/Location Boring No. Ground Elevation Monticello, MN 5 (Surveyed) Location Chelsea Road Drill Machine 41C SHEET 1 of 1 in Co. Coordinate: X= Y= (ft.) Hammer CME Automatic Calibrated Drilling g/16/17 Hennepin I Completed Latitude (North)= Longitude (West)= SPT MC COH Y Other Tests Depth rn Nso (/) (Pst) (pct) 0Or Remarks m#�xe Formation or Member Elev. Classification c o >»i{')«i€tt';fCw 0.5 6" Bituminous pavement 6 GRAVELLY LOAMY SAND, grayish brown, a little brown, 19 – 1.3damp, A -1-b, fill 4 SAND, light brown, a little brown, damp, medium dense, . laminations of plastic sandy loam, A -1-b, alluvium or fill 20 – 4 4.0 X – 5 SAND, light brown, damp, medium dense, A -1-b, alluvium 17 5 or fill 7.0 – 15 – 5 SAND, light brown, damp, medium dense, laminations of X plastic sandy loam, A -1-b, alluvium or fill 10- 12 5 11.5 Bottom of Hole - 11.5' Index Sheet Code Soil Class: Rock Class: Edit. Date: 9/22/17 X:101-GE0101-GEO FOLDERSIGINTlM1 GINT PROJECTS128-01304 (MNDOT FORMA T-AET).GPJ AMERICAN AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. - Mn/DOT TEMPLATE ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. SUBSURFACE BORING LOG UNIQUE NUMBER U.S. Customary Units State ProjectI Bridge No. or Job Desc. I Trunk Highway/Location Boring No. Ground Elevation Monticello, MN 6 (Surveyed) Location Chelsea Road Hennepin Co. Coordinate: X= Y= (ft•) Latitude (North)= Longitude (West)= z Depth o ............ o Q Elev. Classification 0.5 6" Bituminous pavement GRAVELLY LOAMY SAND, dark grayish brown, a little _ 1.5 brown, damp, A -1-b, fill 2.0 SAND, light brown, damp, A -1-b, fill 5— SAND, light brown, damp, medium dense, A -1-b, alluvium – or fill 10- 11.5 Bottom of Hole - 11.5' Drill Machine 41C SHEET 1 of 1 Hammer CME Automatic Calibrated 1 Drilling $/16/17 Completed 16 — 3 13 5 12 – 4 11 5 -------------- Index Sheet Code Soil Class: Rock Class: Edit. Date: 9/22117 X:101-GEOI01-GEO FOLDERSIGINTVAI GINT PROJECTS128-01304 (MNDOT FORMA T-AET).GPJ AMERICAN AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. - Mn/DOT TEMPLATE ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. SUBSURFACE BORING LOG UNIQUE NUMBER U.S. Customary Units State Project I Bridge No. or Job Desc, Trunk Highway/Location Boring No. Ground Elevation Monticello, MN 7 (Surveyed) Location Chelsea Road Drill Machine 41C SHEET 1 of 1 1n Co. Coordinate: X= Y= (ft. Hammer CME Automatic Calibrated i Drilling Hennepin � HCompleted 8/16/17 Latitude (North)= Longitude (West)= SPT MC COH Y Other Tests i Depth o Nso (Y-) (PsO (PcO U") Or Remarks RPP;; iR.-Q "Aaxe o . Formation ...............:.:::::::.:..:::....:..... Elev. Classification o o > � or Member 0.5 6" Bituminous pavement X , 9 – 8 SLIGHTLY PLASTIC SANDY LOAM, a little plastic sandy _ X • . loam, pieces of bituminous, dark grayish brown, a little dark brown and black, moist, A -1-b, fill 20 – 9 4.0 5- 7 6 SAND, light brown, damp, loose to medium dense, laminations of loamy sand, A -1-b, alluvium or fill _ 11 – 8 9.0 _ 10— SAND, light grayish brown, damp, medium dense, A -1-b, — alluvium or fill 15 4 11.5 Bottom of Hole - 11.5' ----------•---------------------------------------------------- Index Sheet Code Soil Class: Rock Class: Edit: Date: 9/22117 X:101-GE0101-GEO FOLDERSIGINTlM1 GINT PROJECTS128-01304 (MNDOT FORMAT-AET).GPJ AMERICAN AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. - Mn/DOT TEMPLATE ENGINEERING � TESTING, INC. SUBSURFACE BORING LOG UNIQUE NUMBER U.S. Customary Units State Project Bridge No. or Job Desc. Trunk Highway/Location Boring No. Ground Elevation Monticello, MN 8 (Surveyed) Location Chelsea Road Hennepin Co. Coordinate: X= Y= Latitude (North)= Longitude (West)= I Depth o Q Elev. Classification 0.5 6" Bituminous pavement x LOAMY SAND, a little plastic sandy loam, pieces of 1.3 " ��bituminous, dark grayish brown, a little brown, moist, A -1-b, 2.0 \fill / -\SAND, grayish brown, damp, A -1-b, fill 5— SAND, light brown, damp, medium dense to loose, lenses and laminations of plastic sandy loam, A -1-b, alluvium or fill 10- 11.5 Bottom of Hole - 11.5' Drill Machine 41C SHEET 1 of 1 Drilling $/16/17 Hammer CME Automatic Calibrated I Completed SPT MC COH Y _ Other Tests 9 17 – 5 13 – 5 12 5 6 – 7 7 7 ------------------------------------------------------------- Index Sheet Code Soil Class: Rock Class: Edit: Date: 9/22/17 X:101-OE0101-OEOFOLDERSIOINTlM1 DINTPROJECTW8-01304(MNDOTFORMA T-AET).OPJ / U.S. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS HYDROMETER \ 6 4 3 2 1.5 1 3/ 1/2 3/8 3 4 6 8 10 1416 20 30 40 50 70 100 140 200 100 f I 95 i 90 85 80 P 7.` \ R 70 \� C \ E 6.` N ,\T 60 \ F 55 \ \' N E So R \ B 45 Y 40 \I 1 W (: E 3\ I G 30 H T 2-- 20 _20 \ to 5 0 100 10 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS I COBBLES GRAVEL SAND SILT OR CLAY coarse I fine coarse I medium I fine Specimen Identification Classification MC% LL PL PI Cc Cu B-1 0.5' LOAMY SAND (A -1-b) m B-4 2.0' LOAMY SAND (A -1-b) * B-6 2.0' SAND (A -1-b) 1.03 4.2 * B-7 0.5' SLIGHTLY PLASTIC SANDY LOAM (A -1-b) (i) B-8 0.5' LOAMY SAND (A -1-b) I 1.55 18.6 Specimen Identification D100 D60 D30 DIO %Gravel %Sand %Silt I %Clay • B-1 0.5' 16.00 0.73 0.254 9.8 77.6 12.6 m B-4 2.0' 12.50 0.62 0.226 6.3 77.2 16.5 * B-6 2.0' 12.50 0.74 0.366 0.1756 8.7 87.6 3.7 * B-7 0.5' 16.00 0.94 0.253 I 15.6 67.0 17.3 O B-8 0.5' 12.50 1.17 0.339 I 14.3 74.9 10.8 PROJECT Cedar Street & Chelsea Road; Monticello, MN AET JOB NO. 28-01304 DATE 9/19/17 AMERICAN ENGINEERING GRADATION CURVES \ TESTING, INC. State Aid 10 Ton ESAL Traffic Forecast Calculator This ESAL calculator is for use with default Heavy Commerical Traffic values; click "User Defined Traffic Values" sheet below if you wish to enter your own Heavy Commercial Traffic values. Instructions: All yellow boxes require an input value. Dropdown choices are provided for Base Year (C18), Number of Lanes (C19), and AADT Range (C20). You must click on cells C18, C19, and C20 to access the dropdown choices. General Information Date Forecast Performed by Name of County or City Project Number Project Description Route Number Base Year (i.e. opening to traffic) Number of Lanes (total both directions) AADT Range Historical AADT (enter a minimum of two years) Enter oldest traffic data here Enter second oldest traffic data here Enter third oldest traffic data here Enter fourth oldest traffic data here Base Year AADT 20 -Year AADT 35 -Year AADT Growth Rate Vehicle Type 2AX-6TIRE SU 3AX+SU 3AX TST 4AX TST 5AX+TST TR TR, BUSES TWIN TRAILERS Total 12/29/17 JM Monticello AET 28-01304 FDR Chelsea Road 2018 968,000 20 -Year Rigid Forecast (10 Ton) = 2 = typical 2 lane 35 -Year Flexible Forecast (10 Ton) = 1,948,000 Urban:>1500 2,763,000 Year AADT 2015 7,648 2016 7,900 2018 8,400 2038 13,440 2053 17,220 3.00% Vehicle Class ' ESAL Tactors % Flexible Rigid 1.52% 0.25 0.24 0.46% 0.58 0.85 0.09% 0.39 0.37 0.12% 0.51 0.53 0.89% 1.13 1.89 0.47% 0.57 0.74 0.02% 2.40 2.33 3.57% NA NA 20 -Year Flexible Forecast (10 Ton) = 968,000 20 -Year Rigid Forecast (10 Ton) = 1,374,000 35 -Year Flexible Forecast (10 Ton) = 1,948,000 35 -Year Rigid Forecast (10 Ton) = 2,763,000 For State Aid questions and information concerning this tool, please contact State Aid Pavement Engineer Joel Wring at joel.ulring@state.mn.us or 651-366-3831. Revised: 12/24/2014 MnPAVE 6.304 Simulation Input File: MnPAVE1.mpv Confidence Level for Preliminary Life Estimate = 70%70%70%70% Confidence and Reliability may not agree. Thickness and modulus are reduced when Confidence > 50%. Monte Carlo Reliability randomly selects values for each layer. Use Reliability for final design. Use Reliability for final desl Preliminary Life Estimate 20 -Year Reliability (2,500 cycles) Fatigue Rutting Fatigue Rutting 37 years 21 years 99.8% 89.4% Project Information District County City 3 Wright Monticello Project Number Route Reference Post 28-01304 Chelsea Rd from to Letting Date Construction Type 09/21/17 Designer Soils Engineer Climate Information Seasons Location 5 45° 12' Latitude, 93° 51' Longitude Structural Information (Design Level: Intermediate) Layer Type Subtype Height (in.) 1a Hot -Mix Asphalt (Pb = 5.0%) PG58-34 (2360F 1/2") 1.50 1b Hot -Mix Asphalt (Pb = 5.0%) PG58-34 (2360F 1/2") 1.50 1c Hot -Mix Asphalt (Pb = 5.0%) PG58-34 (2360F 3/4") 2.00 2a Aggregate Base FDR 7.00 2b Aggregate Base MnDOT Class 5 2.00 3 Engineered Soil R -Value = 30 (A -1-b) 6.00 4 Undisturbed Soil Engineered Soil Modulus/2 Traffic Information (Speed = 30 mph) Load Type First Year ESAL Growth Rate Total Repetitions ESAL 37,670 3.0% (simple) 968,000 Notes The Minnesota Department of Transportation makes no guarantee or warranty, either express or implied, with respect to the reuse of the data provided herewith, regardless of its format or means of its transmission. The user accepts the data "as is", and assumes all risks associated with its use. By accepting this data, the user agrees not to transmit this data or provide access to it or any part of it to another party unless the user shall include with the data a copy of this disclaimer. The Minnesota Department of Transportation assumes no responsibility, actual or consequential, for damage that results from any user's reliance on this data. Printed Friday, December 29, 2017 at 13:20:53 Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Review Chelsea Road Improvements, Monticello, Minnesota December 29, 2017 AET Report No. 28-01304 AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. Geotechnical Report Limitations and Guidelines for Use Appendix B Geotechnical Report Limitations and Guidelines for Use AET Report No. 28-01304A B.1 REFERENCE This appendix provides information to help you manage your risks relating to subsurface problems which are caused by construction delays, cost overruns, claims, and disputes. This information was developed and provided by ASFE', of which, we are a member firm. B.2 RISK MANAGEMENT INFORMATION B.2.1 Geotechnical Services are Performed for Specific Purposes, Persons, and Projects Geotechnical engineers structure their services to meet the specific needs of their clients. A geotechnical engineering study conducted for a civil engineer may not fulfill the needs of a construction contractor or even another civil engineer. Because each geotechnical engineering study is unique, each geotechnical engineering report is unique, prepared solely for the client. No one except you should rely on your geotechnical engineering report without first conferring with the geotechnical engineer who prepared it. And no one, not even you, should apply the report for any purpose or project except the one originally contemplated. B.2.2 Read the Full Report Serious problems have occurred because those relying on a geotechnical engineering report did not read it all. Do not rely on an executive summary. Do not read selected elements only. B.2.3 A Geotechnical Engineering Report is Based on A Unique Set of Project -Specific Factors Geotechnical engineers consider a number of unique, project -specific factors when establishing the scope of a study. Typically factors include: the client's goals, objectives, and risk management preferences; the general nature of the structure involved, its size, and configuration; the location of the structure on the site; and other planned or existing site improvements, such as access roads, parking lots, and underground utilities. Unless the geotechnical engineer who conducted the study specifically indicates otherwise, do not rely on a geotechnical engineering report that was: • not prepared for you, • not prepared for your project, • not prepared for the specific site explored, or • completed before important project changes were made. Typical changes that can erode the reliability of an existing geotechnical engineering report include those that affect: • the function of the proposed structure, as when it's changed from a parking garage to an office building, or from a light industrial plant to a refrigerated warehouse, • elevation, configuration, location, orientation, or weight of the proposed structure, • composition of the design team, or • project ownership. As a general rule, always inform your geotechnical engineer of project changes, even minor ones, and request an assessment of their impact. Geotechnical engineers cannot accept responsibility or liability for problems that occur because their reports do not consider developments of which they were not informed. B.2.4 Subsurface Conditions Can Change A geotechnical engineering report is based on conditions that existed at the time the study was performed. Do not rely on a geotechnical engineering report whose adequacy may have been affected by: the passage of time; by man-made events, such as construction on or adjacent to the site; or by natural events, such as floods, earthquakes, or groundwater fluctuations. Always contact the geotechnical engineer before applying the report to determine if it is still reliable. A minor amount of additional testing or analysis could prevent major problems. 1 ASFE, 8811 Colesville Road/Suite G106, Silver Spring, MD 20910 Telephone: 301/565-2733: www.asfe.om Appendix B — Page 1 of 2 AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC Appendix B Geotechnical Report Limitations and Guidelines for Use AET Report No. 28-01304A B.2.5 Most Geotechnical Findings Are Professional Opinions Site exploration identified subsurface conditions only at those points where subsurface tests are conducted or samples are taken. Geotechnical engineers review field and laboratory data and then apply their professional judgment to render an opinion about subsurface conditions throughout the site. Actual subsurface conditions may differ, sometimes significantly, from those indicated in your report. Retaining the geotechnical engineer who developed your report to provide construction observation is the most effective method of managing the risks associated with unanticipated conditions. B.2.6 A Report's Recommendations Are Not Final Do not overrely on the construction recommendations included in your report. Those recommendations are not final, because geotechnical engineers develop them principally from judgment and opinion. Geotechnical engineers can finalize their recommendations only by observing actual subsurface conditions revealed during construction. The geotechnical engineer who developed your report cannot assume responsibility or liability for the report's recommendations if that engineer docs not perform construction observation. 13.2.7 A Geotechnical Engineering Report Is Subject to Misinterpretation Other design team members' misinterpretation of geotechnical engineering reports has resulted in costly problems. Lower that risk by having your geotechnical engineer confer with appropriate members of the design team after submitting the report. Also retain your geotechnical engineer to review pertinent elements of the design team's plans and specifications. Contractors can also misinterpret a geotechnical engineering report. Reduce that risk by having your geotechnical engineer participate in prebid and preconstruction conferences, and by providing construction observation. 13.2.8 Do Not Redraw the Engineer's Logs Geotechnical engineers prepare final boring and testing logs based upon their interpretation of field logs and laboratory data. To prevent errors or omissions, the logs included in a geotechnical engineering report should never be redrawn for inclusion in architectural or other design drawings. Only photographic or electronic reproduction is acceptable, but recognizes that separating logs from the report can elevate risk. B.2.9 Give Contractors a Complete Report and Guidance Some owners and design professionals mistakenly believe they can make contractors liable for unanticipated subsurface conditions by limiting what they provide for bid preparation. To help prevent costly problems, give contractors the complete geotechnical engineering report, but preface it with a clearly written letter of transmittal. In the letter, advise contractors that the report was not prepared for purposes of bid development and that the report's accuracy is limited; encourage them to confer with the geotechnical engineer who prepared the report (a modest fee may be required) and/or to conduct additional study to obtain the specific types of information they need or prefer. A prebid conference can also be valuable. Be sure contractors have sufficient time to perform additional study. Only then might you be in a position to give contractors the best information available to you, while requiring them to at least share some of the financial responsibilities stemming from unanticipated conditions. B.2.10 Read Responsibility Provisions Closely Some clients, design professionals, and contractors do not recognize that geotechnical engineering is far less exact than other engineering disciplines. This lack of understanding has created unrealistic expectations that have led to disappointments, claims, and disputes. To help reduce the risk of such outcomes, geotechnical engineers commonly include a variety of explanatory provisions in their report. Sometimes labeled "limitations" many of these provisions indicate where geotechnical engineers' responsibilities begin and end, to help others recognize their own responsibilities and risks. Read these provisions closely. Ask questions. Your geotechnical engineer should respond fully and frankly. B.2.11 Geoenvironmental Concerns Are Not Covered The equipment, techniques, and personnel used to perform a geoenvironmental study differ significantly from those used to perform a geotechnical study. For that reason, a geotechnical engineering report does not usually relate any geoenvironmental findings, conclusions, or recommendations; e.g., about the likelihood of encountering underground storage tanks or regulated contaminants. Unanticipated environmental problems have led to numerous project failures. If you have not yet obtained your own geoenvironmental information, ask your geotechnical consultant for risk management guidance. Do not rely on an environmental report prepared for someone else. Appendix B — Page 2 of 2 AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC