The URL can be used to link to this page

City Council Agenda Packet 03-26-2018AGENDA REGULAR MEETING — MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, March 26, 2018 — 6:30 p.m. Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING 5 p.m. (Academy Room) 5 P.M. Spring Clean-up 5:30 p.m. Review of Administrative Items (data practices, open meeting law, agendas/meeting protocol, social media, staff attendance at council meetings, communication protocols, other) Mayor: Brian Stumpf Council Members: Jim Davidson, Bill Fair, Charlotte Gabler, Lloyd Hilgart 1. General Business A. Call to Order & Pledge of Allegiance B. Approval of Meeting Minutes • Special Meeting Minutes from March 12, 2018 • Regular Meeting Minutes from March 12, 2018 C. Consideration of Adding Items to the Agenda D. Citizen Comments E. Public Service Announcements/Updates • Hi -Way Liquors Easter Hours F. Council Liaison Updates • Library Board • EDA • MOAA • Highway 25 Coalition • Parks & Recreation Commission G. Department Updates • City Administrator Update • Water Department 2. Consent Agenda A. Consideration of approving payment of bills B. Consideration of approving new hires and departures for City departments C. Consideration of approving the sale/disposal of surplus city property D. Consideration of approving a Special Event Permit application and allowing the use of the City Commuter Parking Lot and related assistance for a recycling event on April 28, 2018. Applicant: Jason Warehime, Metro Appliance Recycling E. Consideration of adopting a Joint Resolution 2018-19 advocating support for certain legislative issues and priorities for 2018 F. Consideration of waiving monetary limits on municipal tort liability established by Minnesota Statutes G. Consideration of approving amended policy for utility billing winter averaging for residential sewer consumption H. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2018-20 in support of Bondhus Corporation's Job Creation Fund (JCF) application to MN DEED in the amount of $195,000 I. Consideration of approving a request to adopt Ordinance No. 695, 696, and 697 amending the Monticello Zoning Ordinance Chapter 2, Section 4 Specific Review Procedures & Requirements, Chapter 4, Section I I Building Materials, and Chapter 5, Section 3 Accessory Use Standards. Applicant: City of Monticello J. Consideration of authorizing advertisement of bids to relocate FiberNet facilities for the Fallon Avenue Overpass project K. Consideration of approving participation in a City/County traffic study for Briarwood Avenue NE as related to the Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park in the amount of $5,381 L. Consideration to reaffirm previously levied assessments for the Chelsea Road Extension Project, City Project No. 2005-1 IC and to direct no further action M. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2018-21 supporting House File 3708/Senate File 3504 for an additional regulatory option by which the Public Utilities Commission may consider investments made in the Monticello Nuclear Plant 2A. Consideration of items removed from the consent agenda for discussion 3. Public Hearings 4. Regular Agenda A. Consideration of request for City Council participation on Fire Department Ladder Truck Design Committee B. Consideration of approving a professional services agreement with Signature lighting, Inc. for design services of proposed street lighting improvements along Chelsea Road, Washington Street, and the downtown area and for the purchase of lights for the Fallon Avenue overpass project 5. Added Items 6. Adjournment AGENDA CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, March 26, 2018 — 5 p.m. Academy Room, MCC AGENDA 1. Call to Order 2. 5 p.m. Spring Clean -Up Discussion 3. 5:30 p.m. Review of Administrative Items (Data Practices, Open Meeting Law, Agenda/Meeting Protocol, Social Media, Communication Protocol, Staff Attendance at Council Meetings, Other) 4. Adjournment MINUTES SPECIAL MEETING — MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, March 12, 2018 — 5 p.m. Academy Room City Hall - Monticello Community Center Present: Brian Stumpf, Jim Davidson, Bill Fair, Charlotte Gabler, Lloyd Hilgart Absent: None Others: City staff. Jeff O'Neill, Matt Thiesen, Tom Moores, Angela Schumann, Shibani Bisson, Tom Pawelk, and Jennifer Schreiber Other: Darek Vetsch, Wright County and Steve Grittman, NAC 1. Call to Order Mayor Brian Stumpf called the special meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. 2. 5 p.m. CLOSED MEETING — Consideration of negotiations for sale of bio -solids site (1645 County Road 39 NE) 3. 5:30 p.m. Approving Preparation of Southeast Service Area Sewer Extension Technical Memorandum Shibani Bisson, WSB/City Engineer, and Angela Schumann, Community Development Director, gave a presentation on the southeast service area sewer extension. The presentation included: the purpose; history of sanitary sewer system planning; history of trunk fee analysis/sanitary sewer CIP; existing lot inventory; short term and long term growth goals; and the proposed SE sewer technical memorandum. The hourly not to exceed fee for the technical memorandum is $29,292 and is to be funded by the sanitary sewer trunk fund. Ms. Bisson the 2005 Interceptor Project and trunk fee analysis. The city needs to plan for grown but be not overbuild the system. Trunk fee rates of 2006 and 2018 were demonstrated with a total of approximately $2,700/unit for sewer trunk improvements. Angela Schumann discussed the status of the city in terms of growth and resident lot inventory. There are 85 platted residential lots available (from 2018 inventory) and an estimated 475 preliminary platted lots with available sewer/water within city limits. Ms. Schumann noted that existing sewer capacity limits growth in the annexation area. There is a need to evaluate existing system capacity and phased improvements and financing. Discussion ensued among the City Council. Councilmember Fair questioned whether or not trunk fees would increase with the expansion of service. Shibani Bisson responded that they could potentially increase. Gary Nesseth, Realtor, addressed the city council. He noted that it is hard to sell in the city because Monticello doesn't have enough buildable lots. He also questioned which came first — development or infrastructure. Ms. Schumann responded that the city needs to assess what capacity it has. Ms. Bisson added that the study should take approximately two months. City Council Special Meeting Minutes — February 26, 2018 Councilmember Gabler moved approval of preparation of a Southeast Service Area Sewer Extension Technical Memorandum. Councilmember Fair seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. 4. Adjournment By consensus the meeting was adjourned at 6:06 p.m. Recorder: Jennifer Schreiber Approved: Attest: City Administrator City Council Special Meeting Minutes — February 26, 2018 REGULAR MEETING — MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, March 12, 2018 — 6:30 p.m. Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center Present: Mayor Brian Stumpf, Jim Davidson, Bill Fair, Charlotte Gabler, and Lloyd Hilgart Absent: None 1. General Business A. Call to Order & Pledge of Allegiance Mayor Stumpf called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. All members were present. B. Approval of Meeting Minutes Special Meeting Minutes from meeting on February 26, 2018 Councilmember Gabler moved approval of the special meeting minutes of February 26, 2018. Councilmember Hilgart seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Regular Meeting Minutes from meeting on February 26, 2018 Councilmember Gabler moved approval of the regular meeting minutes of February 26, 2018. Councilmember Fair seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. C. Consideration of Adding Items to the Agenda Mayor Stumpf added 2M — Consideration of a Relocation Policy to the agenda and discussion about mid -block bump -outs on Broadway. D. Citizen Comments Bob Ryan, Ryan Chevrolet Cadillac, addressed the City Council and requested a review of the assessments levied to property associated with the Chelsea Road Extension Project, City Project No. 2005-11C. These assessments were levied in 2007. He is concerned that the assessments are too high and requested that they be evaluated. Councilmember Gabler moved to have staff review the assessments and provide an update/recommendation to the City Council. Councilmember Fair seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. E. Public Service Announcements MCC Egg Dive Pool Party is scheduled for March 23 from 5-8:30 p.m. Registration for plots in the community garden opens for city residents on March 19. F. Council Liaison Updates • BCOL — Councilmember Fair provided an update. The Council met on March 2. There was a presentation on invasive species by Wright County. City Council Minutes — March 12, 2018 Page 1 1 5 The County also gave a presentation on the proposed campground. Construction projects and recreational programs were reviewed. • Planning Commission — Councilmember Gabler provided an update. The commission recommended approval of ordinance amendments. The commission received an update on EDA action. In addition, they discussed the flood plain ordinance update. • IEDC — Mayor Stumpf gave an update. Jacob Kramer was recommended for appointment following the resignation of 011i Koropchak-White. There will be a job fair on March 27 at the Monticello High School. There was discussion on upcoming road projects and development. • I-94 Coalition — Councilmember Gabler commented on the last meeting which the city was unable to attain. She reviewed the minutes. The Corridors of Commerce is in process of scoring submitted projects. There was also an update of other projects in metro area. The Coalition Day at the Capitol is April 12. G. Department Updates • City Administrator Update — Jeff O'Neill gave an update on the following: 1) Thanked Angela Schumann and Jim Thares for giving a presentation to the Rotary in regard to downtown development 2) Respectful Workplace Training has been scheduled for Thursday, March 15. 3) There is a transportation meeting at Wright County on Wednesday, March 14 at 1:30 p.m. 4) The Coalition of Utilities Cities meeting is scheduled for Friday, March 16 at 1 p.m. There will be discussion on legislation with the Department of Revenue and Xcel Energy. 5) School Superintendent interviews are scheduled for March 21. Mr. O'Neill is participating in the process. 6) Matt Leonard accepted the position of Engineer/PW Director. 7) An MS4 Audit (stormwater/pollution control program) was conducted and, overall, the audit went well. 8) A Ditch 33 meeting was held to discuss enhancement of the operation. Wright County is reviewing a future maintenance program that would help improve the flow of the ditch. 9) A pre -proposal meeting was held in regard to the RFP on the Fire Station addition. There architects attended the meeting. 10) Construction work is being completed in the front office of City Hall. • John Rued — Chief Building Official — provided an update on spring cleanup activities, more specifically, the issues of nuisance. There was consensus that City Council and staff will discuss a plan of action and areas to target. Staff should continue the process in place until such time discussion takes place. City Council Minutes — March 12, 2018 Page 2 1 5 2. Consent Agenda: Councilmember Hilgart moved approval with a revised 2B and addition of 2M, excluding 2J and 2M for discussion. Councilmember Davidson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. A. Consideration of approving the payment of bills. Recommendation: Approved the bill and purchase card registers for a total amount of $1,271,850. B. Consideration of approving new hires/departures. Recommendation: Approved the hires for MCC and Engineering/Public Works and terminations for MCC and Parks. C. Consideration of approving the sale/disposal of surplus city property. Recommendation: No report this cycle. D. Consideration of appointing a representative to the IEDC for a term to commence immediately and expire December 31, 2018. Recommendation: Approved the appointment of Jacob Kramer to the IEDC Board with a term ending date of December 31, 2018. E. Consideration of approving the Finance Director to attend the 2018 GFOA Conference in St. Louis, Missouri from 5/6/2018 through 5/9/2018 at an estimated cost of $1,700. Recommendation: Approved the Finance Director to attend the 2018 GFOA conference in St. Louis, Missouri from 5/6/2018 through 5/9/2018 at an estimated cost of $1,700. F. Consideration of authorizing staff to enter into a contract with League of MN Cities/American Legal Publishing Corporation for recodification services of the City Code at a cost of $10,500. Recommendation: Authorized staff to enter into a contract with LMC/American Legal publishing for recodification services for the city code at a cost of $10,500. G. Consideration of approving renewal a membership in the MN Public Broadband Alliance for 2018 at a cost of $1,500. Recommendation: Approved membership in the MN Public Broadband Alliance through the end of 2018 with the dues amount of $1,500. H. Consideration of adopting Ordinance 694 amending Title 7, Chapter 6, Garbage, Refuse, and Recycling by adding section titled "Compost Facilities" to require use of compostable bags. Recommendation: Adopted Ordinance 694 amending Title 7, Chapter 6, Garbage, Refuse, and Recycling by adding a section title "Compost Facilities" to require the use of compostable bags and adopted Summary Ordinance 694A for publication. I. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2018-16 approving plans and specifications and authorizing the advertisement of bids for the Chelsea Road Utility and Street Improvements, City Project No. 17C001. Recommendation: Adopted Resolution 2018-16 approving plans and specifications and authorized the advertisement of bids for Chelsea Road Utility and Street Improvements, City Project No. 17C001. City Council Minutes — March 12, 2018 Page 3 1 5 J. Consideration adopting Resolution 2018-17 approving plans and specifications and authorizing the advertisement of bids for turn lane improvements at the intersection of Gillard Avenue and CSAH 39. Recommendation: ITEM WAS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA. K. Consideration of accepting proposals and awarding contract for maintenance rehabilitation of Monticello Deep Well Turbine Pump #1 and High Service Booster Pump #1 to Thein Well Company in the amount of $18,920. Recommendation: Approved the refurbishment of Well #1 and High Service Booster #1 and awarded the contract to Thein Well Company based upon their low proposal of $18,920. L. Consideration of approving a six-month extension of final plat approval for Clear Creek Second Addition. Applicant: Clear Creek Land Company, LLC. Recommendation: Adopted Resolution 2018-18 approving an extension of the final plat approval of Clear Creek Second Addition to September 21, 2018. M. Consideration of approving a new employee Relocation Policy. Recommendation: ITEM WAS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA. 2. Consideration of Items Removed From the Consent Agenda for Discussion J. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2018-17 approving plans and specifications and authorizing the advertisement of bids for turn lane improvements at the intersection of Gillard Avenue and CSAH 39. Mayor Stumpf removed the item to address a concern from a resident in regard to the intersection. The resident questioned the installation of a three way stop at the intersection. Mayor Stumpf requested that either county or city staff respond to the resident on why there isn't a three way stop. Mayor Stumpf moved approval of Alternative 1 - adopting Resolution 2018- 17 approving plans and specifications and authorizing the advertisement of bids for turn lane improvements at the intersection of Gillard Avenue and CSAH 39. Councilmember Fair seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. M. Consideration of approving a new employee Relocation Policy. Councilmember Hilgart removed the item and questioned whether the policy was created because of the new Engineer/Public Works Director. City Administrator Jeff O'Neill concurred. Specifics of the policy were discussed. Councilmember Hilgart moved approval of the new employee Relocation Policy. Councilmember Davidson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. 4. Regular Agenda: A. Consideration of aivrovin2 purchase agreement for sale of citv bio -solids site (Address: 1645 Countv Road 39 NE). City Council Minutes — March 12, 2018 Page 4 1 5 Mayor Stumpf provided a brief recap of the closed meeting in regard to the sale of the bio -solids site. The parties came to an agreement which did not include the road easement. Councilmember Fair moved approval of a purchase agreement for the sale of the city bio -solids site (address: 1645 County Road 39 NE) excluding the 30 ft. road easement. Councilmember Hilgart seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. 5. Added Items: There was discussion in regard to the midblock bump -outs along Broadway. Some of the business owners have complained about the bump -outs and would like to see them removed. There was consensus to direct staff to review and come back with a recommendation. 6. Adiournment By consensus, the meeting was adjourned at 7:28 p.m. Recorder: Jennifer Schreiber Approved: Attest: City Administrator City Council Minutes — March 12, 2018 Page 5 1 5 City Council Agenda: 3/26/2018 2A. Consideration of avvrovin2 pavment of bills (WO) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: City staff submits the attached bill registers and purchasing card registers for approval by Council. The bill registers contain all invoices processed and the purchasing card registers contain all card purchases made since the last Council meeting. Subject to MN Statutes, most invoices require Council approval prior to releasing checks for payment. The day following Council approval, payments will be released unless directed otherwise. A credit purchasing agreement and policy was approved by Council initially and card purchases must comply with the policy. If Council has no questions or comments on the bill and purchase card registers, these can be approved with the consent agenda. If requested, this item can be removed from consent and discussed prior to making a motion for approval. Al. Budget Impact: None A2. Staff Workload Impact: No additional work required. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the bill and purchase card registers for a total amount of $445,511.63. 2. Motion to approve the registers with changes directed by Council. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends Alternative #1 or #2, per direction of Council. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • Bill registers and Purchase Card registers Accounts Payable Computer Check Proof List by Vendor User: Debbie.Davidson Printed: 03/16/2018 - 8:37AM Batch: 00201.03.2018 - 201.03.2018 US Bank/CPE Moiiii6effo Y Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Vendor: 3241 LINCOLN FINANCIAL GROUP Check Sequence: 1 ACH Enabled: True 3/1/2018 March 2018 1,789.68 03/15/2018 101-00000-217066 Check Total: 1,789.68 Vendor: 1593 MN DEPT OF REVENUE - ACH Check Sequence: 2 ACH Enabled: True February Feb Sales Tax - Hi Way Liquor 37,906.82 03/15/2018 609-00000-208100 February Feb Sales Tax - Hi Way Liquor 0.18 03/15/2018 609-49750-443990 February Feb Sales Tax - City Hall 235.09 03/15/2018 101-00000-208100 February Feb Sales Tax - City Hall -0.09 03/15/2018 101-00000-362900 February Feb Waste Tax - City Hall 103.10 03/15/2018 101-00000-208120 February Feb Waste Tax - City Hall -0.10 03/15/2018 101-00000-362900 February Feb Sales Tax - MCC 8,028.70 03/15/2018 226-00000-208100 February Feb Sales Tax - MCC 0.30 03/15/2018 226-45122-443990 February Feb Sales Tax - Water 732.42 03/15/2018 601-00000-208100 February Feb Sales Tax - Water -0.42 03/15/2018 601-00000-362900 Check Total: 47,006.00 Vendor: 1426 CITY OF MONTICELLO Check Sequence: 3 ACH Enabled: True UB Jan 2018 5026 - Ellison Park 14.38 03/15/2018 101-45201-438200 UB Jan 2018 5250 - Bridge Park West 14.38 03/15/2018 101-45201-438200 UB Jan 2018 5637 - Meadow Oak Dog Park 5.45 03/15/2018 101-45201-438200 UB Jan 2018 7224 - WWTP 1,857.12 03/15/2018 602-49480-438200 UB Jan 2018 7256-003 - 349 Broadway W EDA 14.38 03/15/2018 213-46301-438200 UB Jan 2018 7885 - Help Center 23.63 03/15/2018 217-41990-438200 UB Jan 2018 8086 - 4th St. Warming House 18.07 03/15/2018 101-45201-438200 UB Jan 2018 8114 - Hi -Way Liquor 58.27 03/15/2018 609-49754-438200 UB Jan 2018 8117 - MCC 1,019.63 03/15/2018 226-45126-438200 UB Jan 2018 8117 - Fire Station 23.63 03/15/2018 101-42200-438200 UB Jan 2018 8120 - Bldg. Inspec. Garage 14.38 03/15/2018 101-41940-438200 UB Jan 2018 8177 - Library 73.74 03/15/2018 101-45501-438200 UB Jan 2018 8528 - Monti NSP Softball - 2171 River ST. W 14.38 03/15/2018 101-45201-438200 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (03/16/2018 - 8:37 AM) Page 1 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference UB Jan 2018 8622 -Pioneer Pk bathrooms 14.38 03/15/2018 101-45201-438200 UB Jan 2018 8631- Animal Shelter 14.38 03/15/2018 101-42700-438200 UB Jan 2018 8903 - PW Shop/clerical 74.47 03/15/2018 101-43127-438200 UB Jan 2018 8904 - PW Vehicle Stroage 21.68 03/15/2018 101-43127-438200 UB Jan 2018 8905 - PW Office 14.38 03/15/2018 101-43127-438200 UB Jan 2018 10128 - 118 6th St. W 14.88 03/15/2018 101-41941-438200 UB Jan 2018 14476- Ellison House 17.67 03/15/2018 101-45201-438200 Check Total: 3,323.28 Vendor: 2811 US BANK CORPORATE PMT SYSTEM Check Sequence: 4 ACH Enabled: True 03/06/2018 Fastenal - return chisel hammer; chisel -42.76 03/15/2018 101-43127-421990 03/06/2018 Office Depot - refund item received in error. -18.89 03/15/2018 101-43120-421990 03/06/2018 Fastenal -hose - air chisel 1.27 03/15/2018 101-43127-421990 03/06/2018 Grady's - packing graphite 4.49 03/15/2018 601-49440-421990 03/06/2018 Fastenal -safety glasses 4.87 03/15/2018 101-43120-420650 03/06/2018 Monit Napa - #555 (2) filters 8.16 03/15/2018 101-43127-422120 03/06/2018 Monit Napa - #107 (10) boxed miniatures marke 8.30 03/15/2018 101-45201-422110 03/06/2018 Monit Napa - #103 - (2) hose clamp 9.98 03/15/2018 101-43120-422100 03/06/2018 Grady's - 25 ct. Armor All wipes; freshner 10.58 03/15/2018 101-43120-421990 03/06/2018 Cub - resale - (20) limes 11.80 03/15/2018 609-49750-425500 03/06/2018 Fleet Farm - (4.028) gal non oxy gas $2.979 - 4t1 12.00 03/15/2018 101-45201-421200 03/06/2018 Fastenal - (15) misc. shop supplies 12.58 03/15/2018 101-43127-421990 03/06/2018 USPS -postage- quotes for pulling Well #1- Boo; 14.35 03/15/2018 601-49440-432200 03/06/2018 Fleet Farm -Latching Box 14.39 03/15/2018 101-43120-422100 03/06/2018 Monit Napa -(4) filters 15.76 03/15/2018 101-43127-422120 03/06/2018 Auto Value - organic vapor mask 15.95 03/15/2018 101-45201-421650 03/06/2018 Runnings - (2) blast sand - 1/2 7.99 03/15/2018 601-49440-421990 03/06/2018 Runnings - (2) blast sand - 1/2 7.99 03/15/2018 602-49490-421990 03/06/2018 Emergency Med. Prod- 02 tank regulator handle 16.03 03/15/2018 101-42200-422100 03/06/2018 Monti Napa - #103 (4) hose clamp 19.96 03/15/2018 101-43120-422100 03/06/2018 Office Max - (4) clipboard for inventory 29.16 03/15/2018 609-49754-421990 03/06/2018 Allina Health - randon drug test T.B.- 30.00 03/15/2018 101-43120-431990 03/06/2018 Runnings - (4) blk. blast sand - 1/2 15.98 03/15/2018 601-49440-421990 03/06/2018 Runnings - (4) blk. blast sand - 1/2 15.98 03/15/2018 602-49490-421990 03/06/2018 Monit Napa -respirator- Ellison House 31.98 03/15/2018 101-45201-420650 03/06/2018 MN State Patrol - (15) inspection decals 34.50 03/15/2018 101-43127-421990 03/06/2018 Home Depot - painters plastic; pocket surform- J 34.73 03/15/2018 101-41310-421990 03/06/2018 Home Depot - tool box for air chisel 39.97 03/15/2018 101-43127-421990 03/06/2018 Monit Napa - hydr. filter; (2) fuel filter; oil filter 44.65 03/15/2018 101-43127-422120 03/06/2018 Office Depot - paper; desk spindle 50.82 03/15/2018 101-43120-421990 03/06/2018 General Rental - (3) 201b. propane fill 53.07 03/15/2018 101-43127-421990 03/06/2018 Fastenal -12' x 2 chisel; Rnd. Pt. Chsl; Flat oval 1 53.40 03/15/2018 101-43127-421990 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (03/16/2018 - 8:37 AM) Page 2 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 03/06/2018 K Taylors - (5) jackets; (3) blazer cleaning 86.49 03/15/2018 609-49754-431990 03/06/2018 Monit Napa -Sander - 1/2 47.81 03/15/2018 601-49440-421990 03/06/2018 Monit Napa -Sander - 1/2 47.81 03/15/2018 602-49490-421990 03/06/2018 Trueman Welters - (2) cs Tansmission oil 173.00 03/15/2018 101-43120-422100 03/06/2018 G & K - mat srvc- inv. #6043184165; 9987; 604 191.40 03/15/2018 609-49754-431990 03/06/2018 Titan Machine - #103 - comb. left light 217.48 03/15/2018 101-43120-422100 03/06/2018 MRWA - M.T.; M.S. ; B.C.- Tech. Conference 690.00 03/15/2018 601-49440-433100 03/06/2018 Arctic Glacier -resale inv #1957803009; 19578( 278.52 03/15/2018 609-49750-425500 03/06/2018 Tifco Ind. heat shrink; Enviropure;Indust. Chem: 396.70 03/15/2018 101-45201-421650 03/06/2018 Holiday Inn- 2/9 -11/18 -Lodging- Dustin; Jake;1 439.96 03/15/2018 101-42200-433100 03/06/2018 NBP- (4) cs. thrm. paper; (4) pk. tape; suckers; e 502.88 03/15/2018 609-49754-421990 03/06/2018 Grady's - (2) switch 15.98 03/15/2018 101-43127-421990 03/06/2018 Home Depot -industrial ball valve; 5pk elec. tape 22.63 03/15/2018 601-49440-422300 03/06/2018 Zee Medical- bandages; ointment; burn gel; etc- 110.25 03/15/2018 601-49440-420650 03/06/2018 Zee Medical- bandages; ointment; burn gel;eyed 352.30 03/15/2018 101-43127-420650 03/06/2018 Zee Medical- bandages; lg. patch ointment- Hi -'Y 50.04 03/15/2018 609-49754-421990 03/06/2018 Boyer - fender assymb; brace 700.19 03/15/2018 101-43120-422110 03/06/2018 Zarnoth - #217 & #221 - (2) wafer broom refill 761.20 03/15/2018 101-45201-422100 03/06/2018 Dog Waste Depot - (7) cs dog waste bags 825.93 03/15/2018 101-45201-421650 03/06/2018 Aramark - Jan. 2018 uniforms- Parks 175.76 03/15/2018 101-45201-441700 03/06/2018 Aramark - Jan. 2018 uniforms- Sewer 97.60 03/15/2018 602-49490-441700 03/06/2018 Aramark - Jan. 2018 uniforms- Water 97.60 03/15/2018 601-49440-441700 03/06/2018 Aramark - Jan. 2018 uniforms- Streets 212.87 03/15/2018 101-43120-441700 03/06/2018 Aramark - Jan. 2018 Shop towels 242.46 03/15/2018 101-43127-421990 03/06/2018 MN Polution Cntrl - Collec. Sys. Operators Coni 1,170.00 03/15/2018 602-49490-433100 03/06/2018 Allina - Qrt - to keep medicals up to date Inv. 111 1,232.09 03/15/2018 101-42200-431990 03/06/2018 MINNCOR - (8) dock float; roller guide; (10) re 1,318.15 03/15/2018 101-45201-421650 03/06/2018 Verizon Dec 21 - Jan 20 35.01 03/15/2018 101-43115-432100 03/06/2018 Verizon Dec 21 - Jan 20 26.02 03/15/2018 101-43120-432100 03/06/2018 G & K - Inv# 6043189989, 6043195758 93.23 03/15/2018 226-45126-431990 03/06/2018 G & K - Inv# 6043189988 19.60 03/15/2018 101-45501-431990 03/06/2018 Franklin Signs - Just Drive Banner 75.00 03/15/2018 226-45122-431990 03/06/2018 Perkins - City Administrators Lunch (RL) 13.55 03/15/2018 101-41310-433100 03/06/2018 Holiday - Unleaded Fuel 9.789 gals @ $2.499 24.46 03/15/2018 217-41990-421200 03/06/2018 Monit Napa - Graphite Lubricate & Power Lube 15.05 03/15/2018 226-45126-421990 03/06/2018 Grady's - Misc Hardware for Floor Scrubber & F 7.44 03/15/2018 226-45126-422990 03/06/2018 Home Depot - Wood & Hardware for Coat Rack 20.95 03/15/2018 226-45126-422990 03/06/2018 Walmart - Cups & Mints for Cargill Expo 4.93 03/15/2018 226-45122-421990 03/06/2018 Grady's - Heavy Duty Zip Ties for Romp & Ston 7.49 03/15/2018 226-45126-422990 03/06/2018 Grady's - Shims for Shelving at Library 2.79 03/15/2018 101-45501-443990 03/06/2018 Grady's - Hardware for Shelving at Library 1.04 03/15/2018 101-45501-443990 03/06/2018 Dacotah Supply - Bathroom Supplies 124.16 03/15/2018 217-41990-421990 03/06/2018 Cub - Juice Boxes for Birthday Party 13.42 03/15/2018 226-45127-421460 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (03/16/2018 - 8:37 AM) Page 3 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 03/06/2018 Sherwin Williams - Paint 21.18 03/15/2018 217-41990-443990 03/06/2018 Amazon - File Folders 95.76 03/15/2018 226-45122-421990 03/06/2018 Franklin Signs - Uptown Eye Care Banner 75.00 03/15/2018 226-45122-431990 03/06/2018 MNGFOA- 2018 Membership (SR) 50.00 03/15/2018 101-41520-443300 03/06/2018 MNGFOA- 2018 Membership (JC) 50.00 03/15/2018 101-41520-443300 03/06/2018 Verizon Jan 4 - Feb 3 50.92 03/15/2018 101-42400-432100 03/06/2018 Verizon Jan 4 - Feb 3 31.45 03/15/2018 226-45122-432100 03/06/2018 Verizon Jan 4 - Feb 3 41.45 03/15/2018 101-43120-432100 03/06/2018 Verizon Jan 4 - Feb 3 46.18 03/15/2018 601-49440-432100 03/06/2018 Verizon Jan 4 - Feb 3 46.19 03/15/2018 602-49490-432100 03/06/2018 Verizon Dec 11 -Jan 10 25.02 03/15/2018 101-43115-432100 03/06/2018 Verizon Dec 21 - Jan 20 140.04 03/15/2018 101-42200-432100 03/06/2018 Dacotah Paper - Concession Supplies: Paper Plat 218.60 03/15/2018 226-45125-421990 03/06/2018 Dacotah Paper - Bathroom/Locker Room Supplii 1,878.24 03/15/2018 226-45126-421990 03/06/2018 J P Cooke - Ink Stampers (2) 16.43 03/15/2018 217-41990-421990 03/06/2018 Monti Chamber - January Lunch (RL) 15.00 03/15/2018 101-41310-443990 03/06/2018 Monti Chamber - January Lunch (JT) 15.00 03/15/2018 213-46301-443990 03/06/2018 Monti Chamber - January Lunch (AM) 15.00 03/15/2018 226-45122-433100 03/06/2018 Amazon - Staplers (3), Organizer Tray (4), Ink ( 127.93 03/15/2018 101-41310-421990 03/06/2018 Amazon - Kleenex, Coffee, 83.53 03/15/2018 101-41310-421990 03/06/2018 Ausco - Fitness Specialist Clothing 30.00 03/15/2018 226-45127-421110 03/06/2018 USPS - Large Envelope Priority Mail Pkg to St.1 9.32 03/15/2018 217-41990-432200 03/06/2018 Amazon - AED Replacement Battery 92.00 03/15/2018 217-41990-443990 03/06/2018 Amazon - AED Replacement Battery 92.00 03/15/2018 609-49754-443990 03/06/2018 Paypal - Replacement Belt for Jacobs Ladder 25.50 03/15/2018 226-45126-422990 03/06/2018 NBP - Paper 33.56 03/15/2018 226-45122-421990 03/06/2018 Grady's - Snap Rings for Y Chest Machine in We 1.50 03/15/2018 226-45126-422990 03/06/2018 Mailfinance - Postage Machine Lease Payment ( 564.33 03/15/2018 101-41310-441500 03/06/2018 ThyssenKrupp - Maintenance Agreement 2/1/18 596.08 03/15/2018 226-45126-431990 03/06/2018 Randys - Monthly Shredding Service (DMV) 19.58 03/15/2018 217-41990-431990 03/06/2018 Randys - Monthly Shredding Service (CH) 19.58 03/15/2018 101-41310-431990 03/06/2018 NBP - Stapler 13.99 03/15/2018 226-45122-421990 03/06/2018 NBP - Dry Erase Board, Dry Erase Markers. Wa: 39.67 03/15/2018 217-41990-421990 03/06/2018 Amazon - Address Labels, Kleenex, Breakroom 161.75 03/15/2018 101-41310-421990 03/06/2018 Marshalls - Jump Ropes for Fitness Classes (11) 66.89 03/15/2018 226-45127-421720 03/06/2018 Walmart - Dry Erase Markes, Note Pad 20.44 03/15/2018 226-45122-421990 03/06/2018 Walmart - Basket 7.44 03/15/2018 226-45122-421990 03/06/2018 Walmart - Safety Pins 5.97 03/15/2018 226-45123-421460 03/06/2018 Walmart - Protein Bars 38.16 03/15/2018 226-45125-425410 03/06/2018 Walmart - Cupcakes 5.98 03/15/2018 226-45127-421460 03/06/2018 Holiday - Unleaded Fuel 9581 gals @ $2.559 24.52 03/15/2018 217-41990-421200 03/06/2018 Amazon - Replace CD Players (2) 35.66 03/15/2018 226-45127-421720 03/06/2018 J P Cooke - Black Ink Refill 12.70 03/15/2018 217-41990-421990 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (03/16/2018 - 8:37 AM) Page 4 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 03/06/2018 J P Cooke - Black Ink Refill & Heavy Duty Date 73.20 03/15/2018 217-41990-421990 03/06/2018 Amazon - Staples, Stapler, Coffee, 89.88 03/15/2018 101-41310-421990 03/06/2018 Amazon - Foosball Handles 16.75 03/15/2018 226-45123-421460 03/06/2018 NBP - Rubber Bands, Staples 9.14 03/15/2018 217-41990-421990 03/06/2018 Home Depot - Plywood 20.92 03/15/2018 226-45126-422990 03/06/2018 Kwik Trip - Bathroom Supply 2.67 03/15/2018 217-41990-421990 03/06/2018 Grady's - Hose & Clamps for Pool Chemicals 5.95 03/15/2018 226-45126-422990 03/06/2018 Advanced Disposal - Jan 2018 37,593.06 03/15/2018 101-43230-438400 03/06/2018 Advanced Disposal - Jan 2018 - Recycling 12,919.50 03/15/2018 101-43230-438400 03/06/2018 Advanced Disposal - Jan 2018 - GFEE 1,251.64 03/15/2018 101-00000-208120 03/06/2018 Advanced Disposal - Jan 2018 35.80 03/15/2018 101-43127-438400 03/06/2018 Advanced Disposal - Jan 2018 47.74 03/15/2018 101-45201-438400 03/06/2018 Advanced Disposal - Jan 2018 23.87 03/15/2018 101-45201-438400 03/06/2018 Advanced Disposal - Jan 2018 113.38 03/15/2018 602-49480-438400 03/06/2018 Advanced Disposal - Jan 2018 208.87 03/15/2018 226-45126-438400 03/06/2018 Advanced Disposal - Jan 2018 23.87 03/15/2018 609-49754-438400 03/06/2018 Advanced Disposal - Jan 2018 23.87 03/15/2018 101-45201-438400 03/06/2018 Advanced Disposal - Jan 2018 11.93 03/15/2018 101-45501-431990 03/06/2018 Boyer - #110 - Core return -185.31 03/15/2018 101-43120-422110 03/06/2018 Grady's - qt. paint for tool boxes 10.48 03/15/2018 601-49440-421990 03/06/2018 Holiday - (6.079) gal. diesel @ $2.999- snow blc 18.23 03/15/2018 101-45201-421200 03/06/2018 Holiday - (4.595) gal. diesel @ $2.999- snow blc 13.78 03/15/2018 101-45201-421200 03/06/2018 Monit Napa - #105- LED lights 16.49 03/15/2018 101-43120-422110 03/06/2018 Cub - resale - (20) limes; (10) lemons 23.70 03/15/2018 609-49750-425500 03/06/2018 Cub - resale - (30) limes; (6) lemons 26.64 03/15/2018 609-49750-425500 03/06/2018 Marco Group - (2) Lever Lock for 150 & 151- S 33.62 03/15/2018 101-43127-421990 03/06/2018 Hirshfield's - (2) gal paint; frog tape; etc -Librax} 104.37 03/15/2018 101-45501-422300 03/06/2018 CWP - air hose - pusher plow; chipping hammer 47.52 03/15/2018 101-43125-422100 03/06/2018 Home Depot - 100ft. laser measure 69.97 03/15/2018 101-45201-421650 03/06/2018 Boyer - #110 - pump; core; drain; gasket 435.76 03/15/2018 101-43120-422110 03/06/2018 Menards- self -stick base; tec. vinyl comp 51.18 03/15/2018 101-45201-421650 03/06/2018 Amazon - Yellow Ink, Coffee, 119.44 03/15/2018 101-41310-421990 03/06/2018 G & K - Inv# 6043184163, 6043172598 31.20 03/15/2018 217-41990-421990 03/06/2018 DJ's Companies - Personal Chrg to City CC - Re 200.00 03/15/2018 101-00000-115030 03/06/2018 Wall Street Journal - Monthly Subscription WO 36.99 03/15/2018 101-41520-443300 03/06/2018 Ausco - Clothing for Employees; Empl to Reimt 130.00 03/15/2018 101-00000-115030 03/06/2018 MN State Colleges - 2018 MCFOA Confemce R 275.00 03/15/2018 101-41410-433100 03/06/2018 NBP - Returned Stapler -26.99 03/15/2018 217-41990-421990 03/06/2018 NBP - Paper, Binder Clips, Cleaning Supplies, 59.03 03/15/2018 217-41990-421990 03/06/2018 Grady's - (2) gasket cap thread; o ring 2.87 03/15/2018 101-45201-422110 03/06/2018 Grady's -(6) asst. hex screws 3.80 03/15/2018 601-49440-421990 03/06/2018 Monit Napa - #230 - gasket; o ring 4.18 03/15/2018 101-45201-421650 03/06/2018 Grady's - (3) keyblank 5.97 03/15/2018 101-45201-421650 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (03/16/2018 - 8:37 AM) Page 5 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 03/06/2018 Monit Napa -(8) lamp - shop supplies 13.52 03/15/2018 101-43127-421990 03/06/2018 Grady's - padlock 13.99 03/15/2018 101-42200-421990 03/06/2018 Fastenal 4234 -repair supplies misc. 17.34 03/15/2018 101-45201-422100 03/06/2018 Home Depot -(4) safety staple 19.88 03/15/2018 601-49440-421990 03/06/2018 Auto Value - stylus; direct connect; etc 40.83 03/15/2018 101-45201-421650 03/06/2018 Nighthawk - March 2018 security monitor/cellul 49.95 03/15/2018 101-42200-431900 03/06/2018 Home Depot - Extendable Floor Roller; (2) 2pk 1 54.90 03/15/2018 101-45201-421650 03/06/2018 Titan Machine - CAP prt #BN324706 55.18 03/15/2018 101-43120-422100 03/06/2018 Runnings - 100' hose; ice melt; cbl. tie 56.06 03/15/2018 101-42200-421990 03/06/2018 Beef O Brady's - (5) meals -1/2 Water 28.18 03/15/2018 601-49440-421990 03/06/2018 Beef O Brady's - (5) meals - 1/2 Sewer 28.17 03/15/2018 602-49490-421990 03/06/2018 Monit Napa - #551 & stock- (24) qt. oil; filter 76.04 03/15/2018 101-43127-421990 03/06/2018 Moon Motors - Ranger Yuasa Battery- Fire 117.95 03/15/2018 101-42200-422110 03/06/2018 Turfwerks - #234 - Cushman Roll Bar 150.00 03/15/2018 101-45201-422100 03/06/2018 Amazon -16 oz. motor oil 5.76 03/15/2018 101-42200-421200 03/06/2018 Amazon -battery; paper punch; (6) tape 28.63 03/15/2018 101-42200-421990 03/06/2018 Amazon -LED lightbar; hitch adapter; mounting 213.42 03/15/2018 101-42200-422110 03/06/2018 Emer. Auto Tech- #110- (2) repl strobe assy w/ I 261.32 03/15/2018 101-43125-422110 03/06/2018 Boyer - #107 - 35SI Reman - Streets 276.28 03/15/2018 101-43120-422110 03/06/2018 Dyna- (50) crimp & shrink conn.; screws; flats 239.67 03/15/2018 101-43127-421990 03/06/2018 Dyna- (100) asst. bolt Dome Head Plow; (150) a 377.76 03/15/2018 101-43125-422450 03/06/2018 Titan Machine - #721- Transmission cooler; cool 1,768.80 03/15/2018 101-43120-422100 03/06/2018 WHCE - Sunset Pds Lift Sta 1/1-2/1/2018 140.64 03/15/2018 602-49490-438100 03/06/2018 WHCE - 1645 & 1675 CR 39 40.22 03/15/2018 602-49490-438100 03/06/2018 WHCE - DMV 19.95 03/15/2018 217-41990-431900 03/06/2018 WHCE - 2171 W, River St - Parks 36.45 03/15/2018 101-45201-431900 03/06/2018 WHCE - 5980 Jason Ave NE - Water 19.95 03/15/2018 601-49440-431900 03/06/2018 WHCE - MCC 27.95 03/15/2018 226-45126-431900 03/06/2018 WHCE - 207 Chelsea -Water 32.95 03/15/2018 601-49440-431900 03/06/2018 WHCE - 209 Cedar -Water 29.95 03/15/2018 601-49440-431900 03/06/2018 WHCE -132 E. Broadway -Water 29.95 03/15/2018 601-49440-431900 03/06/2018 WHCE -107 River St. W - Parks 19.95 03/15/2018 101-45201-431900 03/06/2018 WHCE -March 2018 - Hi -Way Liquor 21.42 03/15/2018 609-49754-431900 03/06/2018 WHCE -March 2018 - MCC 19.95 03/15/2018 226-45126-431900 03/06/2018 WHCE -March 2018 - 200 Dundas - Water 29.95 03/15/2018 601-49440-431900 03/06/2018 WHCE -March 2018 - 909 Golf Course Rd - PW 19.95 03/15/2018 101-43110-431900 03/06/2018 WHCE -General Street Lighting 1,320.11 03/15/2018 101-43160-438100 03/06/2018 Grady's - (3) Hex nipple 1/4" 8.97 03/15/2018 101-43125-422100 03/06/2018 Cub - resale - (30) limes 20.70 03/15/2018 609-49750-425500 03/06/2018 Auto Value - #234 brake fluid 20.99 03/15/2018 101-45201-422100 03/06/2018 Monit Napa - #234 & shop- switch; (2) flasher; ( 102.41 03/15/2018 101-45201-422100 03/06/2018 Holiday - (4.008) gal. diesel @ $2.999 - snow m. 12.02 03/15/2018 101-45201-421200 03/06/2018 Holiday - Unleaded Fuel 9.663 gals @ $2.499 24.15 03/15/2018 217-41990-421200 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (03/16/2018 - 8:37 AM) Page 6 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number 03/06/2018 Amazon - Kettlebells (2) 76.98 03/15/2018 226-45127-421720 03/06/2018 Amazon - Kettlebells (15), Bar Collars (15), Stel 868.38 03/15/2018 226-45127-421720 03/06/2018 Amazon - Coat Rack, Laminator, Mouse Pad, Pc 161.51 03/15/2018 101-41310-421990 03/06/2018 123 SignUp - Area Chapter Payroll Meeting 3/1' 25.00 03/15/2018 101-41520-433100 03/06/2018 MN Farmers Market Assoc - Spring Conference 50.00 03/15/2018 226-45122-433100 03/06/2018 MN Farmers Market Assoc - 2018 Membership 70.00 03/15/2018 226-45122-443300 03/06/2018 Trusted Employees - Feb Background Checks (3 75.85 03/15/2018 226-45122-431990 03/06/2018 Trusted Employees - Feb Background Checks (2 41.50 03/15/2018 217-41990-431990 03/06/2018 Trusted Employees - Feb Background Checks (1 18.50 03/15/2018 609-49754-431990 03/06/2018 Horizon CPO Seminars - CPO Training (KF) 276.50 03/15/2018 226-45122-433100 03/06/2018 Cub - Water 2.50 03/15/2018 101-41800-443990 03/06/2018 Marites Farm - Salt for Softner (63 bags) 371.70 03/15/2018 226-45126-421990 03/06/2018 Office Max - Bulletin Board 51.99 03/15/2018 226-45122-421990 03/06/2018 Monti Vacuum - Bags & Brushes for Vacuum 51.80 03/15/2018 226-45126-421990 03/06/2018 Walmart - Protien Bars 17.38 03/15/2018 226-45125-425410 03/06/2018 Walmart - Timers, Sharpies, Pens, 16.21 03/15/2018 226-45122-421990 03/06/2018 Constant Contact - Monthly Email Subscription 65.00 03/15/2018 226-45122-430900 03/06/2018 Grady's - (4) screw carr - Fire 1.80 03/15/2018 101-42200-421990 03/06/2018 Menards- Armstoo4 - Floor Repair - PW 35.49 03/15/2018 101-43127-422300 03/06/2018 Holiday Inn- -Lodging tax not exempt. - Fire 45.64 03/15/2018 101-42200-433100 03/06/2018 Allied Electronics- (2) hour meters- Chestnut Lfi 77.29 03/15/2018 602-49490-422100 03/06/2018 Amazon - Fire HD 8 Tablet - Parks 92.26 03/15/2018 101-45201-421650 03/06/2018 Royal Tire - #103- flat repair on Loader 155.90 03/15/2018 101-43120-440500 03/06/2018 Warning Lites- (6) Training- St. Coud 3-1-18- St 239.70 03/15/2018 101-43120-433100 03/06/2018 Warning Lites- (6) Training- St. Coud 3-1-18- PE 239.70 03/15/2018 101-45201-433100 03/06/2018 Klingspor - (75) bonded abrasives - Shop supply 152.42 03/15/2018 101-43127-421990 03/06/2018 Cornerstone Cafe - Lunch with PW Director Can 42.53 03/15/2018 101-41310-433100 03/06/2018 Cornerstone Cafe - Lunch with PW Dir Cand Ad 0.45 03/15/2018 101-00000-115030 03/06/2018 Ausco - Staff T -Shirts 262.00 03/15/2018 226-45123-421110 03/06/2018 Von Hanson's Snacks - Flavored Pretzels for Cor 83.00 03/15/2018 226-45125-425410 03/06/2018 US Bank - Qrtly Rebate -4,657.44 03/15/2018 101-00000-362970 Check Total: 75,353.53 Vendor: 2438 VANCO SERVICES LLC Check Sequence: 5 00008799768 Vanco - Gateway Exchange - February 2018 13.05 03/15/2018 656-00000-202099 00008799768 Vanco - Gateway Exchange - February 2018 54.60 03/15/2018 601-49440-443980 00008799768 Vanco - Gateway Exchange - February 2018 54.61 03/15/2018 602-49490-443980 Check Total: 122.26 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (03/16/2018 - 8:37 AM) Reference ACH Enabled: True Page 7 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Total for Check Run: 127,594.75 Total of Number of Checks: The preceding list of bills payable was reviewed and approved for payment. Date: 3/26/18 Approved by Mayor Brian Stumpf AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (03/16/2018 - 8:37 Alva) Page 8 Accounts Payable Computer Check Proof List by Vendor User: Julie.Cheney Printed: 03/21/2018 - 3:16PM Batch: 00203.03.2018 - 203.03.2018 AP Invoice No Description Vendor: 1036 APEC AQUISITIONS INC 122277 Filters: 18x48 ML & 12x12 MS (6 ea) 275436 Check Total: Vendor: 3491 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3245406 resale - beer 3246966 resale - beer 3248079 resale - beer Amount Payment Date Acct Number Check Sequence: 1 112.47 03/27/2018 226-45126-422990 112.47 Moiiii6eflo Y Reference ACH Enabled: True Check Sequence: 2 ACH Enabled: False 171.50 03/27/2018 609-49750-425200 32.00 03/27/2018 609-49750-425200 138.50 03/27/2018 609-49750-425200 342.00 Check Total: Vendor: 4502 ARVIG 275436 Feb. 2018 - Graybar Elec; Calix; Border States; a 3/8/2018 Meraki MX84 Firewall & Licenses 3/8/2018 IT Services - March 2018 Check Total: Vendor: 2886 AUSCO DESIGN AND MARKETING 3479 Maintenance Staff Shirts Check Total: Vendor: 1723 KEVIN BAME 03/14/2018 Food Camp 2/3/18 - 3/10/18 Check Total: Vendor: 1065 BELLBOY CORPORATION 63163800 resale - liquor 63163800 freight 63167400 freight 63167400 resale - liquor Amount Payment Date Acct Number Check Sequence: 1 112.47 03/27/2018 226-45126-422990 112.47 Moiiii6eflo Y Reference ACH Enabled: True Check Sequence: 2 ACH Enabled: False 171.50 03/27/2018 609-49750-425200 32.00 03/27/2018 609-49750-425200 138.50 03/27/2018 609-49750-425200 342.00 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (03/21/2018 - 3:16 PM) Page 1 Check Sequence: 3 ACH Enabled: True 13,459.65 03/27/2018 656-49877-421800 4,245.00 03/27/2018 702-00000-424100 1,823.85 03/27/2018 702-00000-431990 19,528.50 Check Sequence: 4 ACH Enabled: False 120.00 03/27/2018 226-45126-421110 120.00 Check Sequence: 5 ACH Enabled: False 1,240.00 03/27/2018 226-45127-431990 1,240.00 Check Sequence: 6 ACH Enabled: True 1,545.15 03/27/2018 609-49750-425100 27.00 03/27/2018 609-49750-433300 13.50 03/27/2018 609-49750-433300 639.50 03/27/2018 609-49750-425100 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (03/21/2018 - 3:16 PM) Page 1 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 63252200 freight 20.25 03/27/2018 609-49750-433300 63252200 resale -liquor 1,028.01 03/27/2018 609-49750-425100 97278700 resale - condiments 39.60 03/27/2018 609-49750-425500 97278700 freight 0.18 03/27/2018 609-49750-433300 97308400 resale -juice 99.99 03/27/2018 609-49750-425500 97308400 freight 0.46 03/27/2018 609-49750-433300 Check Total: 3,413.64 Vendor: 1067 BERNICK'S Check Sequence: 7 ACH Enabled: False 14896 resale - coffee 87.36 03/27/2018 226-45125-425410 37730 resale - soda pop 55.00 03/27/2018 609-49750-425400 37730 resale -juice 32.80 03/27/2018 609-49750-425500 37731 resale - beer 785.55 03/27/2018 609-49750-425200 38637 resale - pop, water, Gatorade 221.85 03/27/2018 226-45125-425410 40448 resale - pop, water, Gatorade, Muscle Milk 550.40 03/27/2018 226-45125-425410 40449 resale - soda pop 121.12 03/27/2018 609-49750-425400 40449 resale -juice 16.40 03/27/2018 609-49750-425500 40450 resale - soda pop 756.30 03/27/2018 609-49750-425400 Check Total: 2,626.78 Vendor: 1080 BRAEMAR MAILING SERVICE INC Check Sequence: 8 ACH Enabled: False 58799 UB March 2018 Invoices (3739) FNM Insert 74.78 03/27/2018 656-00000-202099 58799 UB March 2018 Inv - (3739) Print, Fold, Stuff,1 511.13 03/27/2018 601-49440-431800 58799 UB March 2018 Inv - (3739) Print, Fold, Stuff,1 511.14 03/27/2018 602-49490-431800 Check Total: 1,097.05 Vendor: 3632 BRIAN BRAMLEY Check Sequence: 9 ACH Enabled: True 10599 dba- Emergency Rsp. Sol- MSA F-28 6" Stand.1 52.78 03/27/2018 101-42200-421990 Check Total: 52.78 Vendor: 4328 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN WINE & SPIF Check Sequence: 10 ACH Enabled: False 1080770245 resale - liquor 1,035.28 03/27/2018 609-49750-425100 1080770245 resale - wine 45.08 03/27/2018 609-49750-425300 1080770245 freight 12.38 03/27/2018 609-49750-433300 1080770246 resale - beer 83.10 03/27/2018 609-49750-425200 1080773441 resale - liquor 2,786.68 03/27/2018 609-49750-425100 1080773441 resale - wine 36.80 03/27/2018 609-49750-425300 1080773441 freight 36.32 03/27/2018 609-49750-433300 1080773442 resale - beer 27.70 03/27/2018 609-49750-425200 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (03/21/2018 - 3:16 PM) Page 2 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Check Total: 4,063.34 Vendor: 1091 CAMPBELL KNUTSON PA Check Sequence: 11 ACH Enabled: True 2348-000G 187 Bio Solids - Feb 2018 240.00 03/27/2018 602-49480-430400 2348-000G 187 201806 - Otter Creek Crossing 6th Addition - Fe 368.00 03/27/2018 101-00000-220110 2348-000G 187 Planning & Zoning - Feb 2018 192.00 03/27/2018 101-41910-430400 2348-000G 187 General Legal - Feb 2018 1,482.47 03/27/2018 101-41610-430400 2348-OOIG 107 Code Enforcement - Feb 2018 184.00 03/27/2018 101-42400-430400 2348-148G 7 16C006 - Fallon Ave Condemnation - Feb 2018 2,687.50 03/27/2018 400-43300-459018 2348-153G 2 201806 - Otter Creek Crossing 6th Addition - Fe 169.60 03/27/2018 101-00000-220110 Check Total: 5,323.57 Vendor: 4646 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES L.P. Check Sequence: 12 ACH Enabled: True 2075811 resale - beer 12,923.94 03/27/2018 609-49750-425200 2075811 resale - beer n/a 258.15 03/27/2018 609-49750-425400 2078777 resale - beer 11,493.80 03/27/2018 609-49750-425200 354-349 resale - beer credit -30.55 03/27/2018 609-49750-425200 354-375 resale - beer credit -115.85 03/27/2018 609-49750-425200 Check Total: 24,529.49 Vendor: 4089 CARLSON & LYTER DISTRIBUTING, INC Check Sequence: 13 ACH Enabled: True 617-0054 resale - beer 184.60 03/27/2018 609-49750-425200 Check Total: 184.60 Vendor: 1106 CENTRAL MCGOWAN INC Check Sequence: 14 ACH Enabled: True 00185737 Bulk Carbon Dioxide (547 lbs) 136.40 03/27/2018 226-45124-421600 Check Total: 136.40 Vendor: 1896 CENTRAL MN HOUSING PARTNERSHIP IN( Check Sequence: 15 ACH Enabled: False 3/20/2018 Feasibility Assessment Agreement 1,000.00 03/27/2018 213-46301-431990 Check Total: 1,000.00 Vendor: 3831 RAELYNN COOK Check Sequence: 16 ACH Enabled: True 3/15/2018 Mileage Reimbursement -CPP Class & Chapter ] 102.68 03/27/2018 101-41520-433100 Check Total: 102.68 Vendor: 4861 CORE & MAIN LP Check Sequence: 17 ACH Enabled: False I539679 (2) 10 S92 Standon Saddle Support - Water 224.58 03/27/2018 601-49440-422300 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (03/21/2018 - 3:16 PM) Page 3 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number 224.58 Check Total: Vendor: 1124 CREATIVE FORMS AND CONCEPTS INC 116240 03/27/2018 A/P Checks (2,500) 433.15 Check Total: Vendor: 1129 DAHLHEIMER BEVERAGE LLC 1332702 03/27/2018 resale - beer n/a 1332702 03/27/2018 resale - beer 1332773 03/27/2018 resale - beer 1332773 03/27/2018 resale - beer n/a 170870 03/27/2018 resale - beer 170870 03/27/2018 resale - beer n/a 171231 03/27/2018 resale - beer cr. 171521 03/27/2018 resale - beer 171521 03/27/2018 resale - beer n/a 171608 03/27/2018 resale - beer 171671 03/27/2018 resale - beer 171711 03/27/2018 resale - beer credit 172291 03/27/2018 resale - beer 172306 03/27/2018 resale - beer credit 39,807.24 Check Total: Vendor: 2050 DEMVI LLC 3/12/2018 03/27/2018 April Parking Lot Easement Maint Agreement 121.60 Check Total: Vendor: 4921 TONY FAIR 3/4/18 03/27/2018 Training 3/2-4/18 Mankato - mileage; meals 164.91 Check Total: Vendor: 2273 FIBERNET MONTICELLO - ACH 3/8/2018 03/27/2018 City Hall Phone - March 2018 3/8/2018 03/27/2018 MCC Phone - March 2018 3/8/2018 03/27/2018 Ballfields Phone - March 2018 3/8/2018 03/27/2018 DMV Phone - March 2018 3/8/2018 03/27/2018 Hi Way Liquor Phone - March 2018 3/8/2018 03/27/2018 Fire Hall Phone - March 2018 3/8/2018 03/27/2018 Public Works Phone - March 2018 Amount Payment Date Acct Number 224.58 Check Sequence: 18 433.15 03/27/2018 101-41520-421990 433.15 Check Sequence: 19 17.65 03/27/2018 609-49750-425400 1,669.35 03/27/2018 609-49750-425200 4,614.65 03/27/2018 609-49750-425200 17.65 03/27/2018 609-49750-425400 20,479.84 03/27/2018 609-49750-425200 167.20 03/27/2018 609-49750-425400 -15.95 03/27/2018 609-49750-425200 12,047.20 03/27/2018 609-49750-425200 52.10 03/27/2018 609-49750-425400 430.65 03/27/2018 609-49750-425200 247.50 03/27/2018 609-49750-425200 -211.00 03/27/2018 609-49750-425200 517.15 03/27/2018 609-49750-425200 -226.75 03/27/2018 609-49750-425200 39,807.24 Check Sequence: 20 121.60 03/27/2018 213-46301-443990 121.60 Check Sequence: 21 164.91 03/27/2018 101-42200-433100 164.91 Check Sequence: 22 646.62 03/27/2018 702-00000-432100 537.19 03/27/2018 702-00000-432100 19.54 03/27/2018 702-00000-432100 282.59 03/27/2018 702-00000-432100 344.23 03/27/2018 702-00000-432100 203.99 03/27/2018 702-00000-432100 234.02 03/27/2018 702-00000-432100 Reference ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: True AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (03/21/2018 - 3:16 PM) Page 4 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 3/8/2018 Parks Phone - March 2018 114.06 03/27/2018 702-00000-432100 3/8/2018 Prairie Center Phone - March 2018 14.22 03/27/2018 702-00000-432100 3/8/2018 Sheriff Phone - March 2018 69.84 03/27/2018 702-00000-432100 3/8/2018 City Hall Internet - March 2018 124.95 03/27/2018 702-00000-432300 3/8/2018 MCC Internet - March 2018 10.00 03/27/2018 702-00000-432300 3/8/2018 Ballfields Internet - March 2018 10.00 03/27/2018 702-00000-432300 3/8/2018 DMV Internet - March 2018 41.95 03/27/2018 702-00000-432300 3/8/2018 Hi Way Liquors Internet - March 2018 41.95 03/27/2018 702-00000-432300 3/8/2018 Fire Hall Internet - March 2018 41.95 03/27/2018 702-00000-432300 3/8/2018 Animal Shelter Internet - March 2018 29.95 03/27/2018 702-00000-432300 3/8/2018 Public Works Internet - March 2018 69.95 03/27/2018 702-00000-432300 3/8/2018 Sheriff Internet - March 2018 41.95 03/27/2018 702-00000-432300 3/8/2018 City Hall Cable - March 2018 12.95 03/27/2018 101-41310-431990 3/8/2018 MCC Cable - March 2018 329.81 03/27/2018 226-45127-432500 3/8/2018 City Hall Data Hosting - March 2018 500.00 03/27/2018 702-00000-431900 3/8/2018 City Hall Service Contract - March 2018 250.00 03/27/2018 702-00000-431900 Check Total: 3,971.71 Vendor: 1810 FS3 INC Check Sequence: 23 ACH Enabled: False 46842 (40) Fiberglass Rod Sp. Mntd Brackets 496.36 03/27/2018 101-43125-421990 Check Total: 496.36 Vendor: 1740 BRAD FYLE Check Sequence: 24 ACH Enabled: False 03/12/18 Training 2/26/18 Mankato- mileage & meal 133.72 03/27/2018 101-42200-433100 Check Total: 133.72 Vendor: 4391 WIL GOETSCH Check Sequence: 25 ACH Enabled: True 3/19/2018 Referee Men's Spring Hockey - 4 Games - 3/18/" 240.00 03/27/2018 226-45127-431990 Check Total: 240.00 Vendor: 1205 GRAINGER INC Check Sequence: 26 ACH Enabled: False 9720128447 Wall Mount Fan (2) 81.62 03/27/2018 226-45126-422990 Check Total: 81.62 Vendor: 1223 HAWKINS INC Check Sequence: 27 ACH Enabled: True 4242294 Pool Chemicals 1,217.70 03/27/2018 226-45124-421600 Check Total: 1,217.70 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (03/21/2018 - 3:16 PM) Page 5 Invoice No Description Vendor: 4650 JASEN HOGLUND 0139 Riverside Cemetery- 30"x44" Sign; #217 3" whit 2800451 Check Total: Vendor: 4218 HOHENSTEINS, INC 951716 resale - beer 03/27/2018 Check Total: Vendor: 3356 INDIAN ISLAND WINERY 2036 resale- wine Check Total: Vendor: 1259 JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING 2800451 resale - beer 2800451 freight 2800472 resale - beer 2800472 freight 03/27/2018 Check Total: Vendor: 4922 JOHN NAGENGAST DOORS LLC 6493 Install New Fiberglass Enttry Interior Pool Main Check Total: Vendor: 1263 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 5953598 resale - liquor 5953598 freight 5953599 resale - wine 5953599 resale - mix 5953599 freight 5954676 freight 5954676 resale - liquor 5954677 resale - wine 5954677 resale - mix 5954677 freight 5957025 freight 5957025 resale - liquor 5957026 resale - liquor 5957026 freight 5958635 freight Amount Payment Date Acct Number Check Sequence: 28 152.00 03/27/2018 651-49010-421990 152.00 Check Sequence: 29 586.76 03/27/2018 609-49750-425200 586.76 Check Sequence: 30 232.32 03/27/2018 609-49750-425300 232.32 Check Sequence: 31 1,387.40 03/27/2018 609-49750-425200 3.00 03/27/2018 609-49750-433300 1,740.35 03/27/2018 609-49750-425200 3.00 03/27/2018 609-49750-433300 3,133.75 Check Sequence: 32 3,450.00 03/27/2018 226-45126-431990 3,450.00 Check Sequence: 33 5,052.56 03/27/2018 609-49750-425100 49.92 03/27/2018 609-49750-433300 1,411.80 03/27/2018 609-49750-425300 121.35 03/27/2018 609-49750-425400 47.68 03/27/2018 609-49750-433300 19.00 03/27/2018 609-49750-433300 1,212.30 03/27/2018 609-49750-425100 1,216.14 03/27/2018 609-49750-425300 35.00 03/27/2018 609-49750-425400 21.47 03/27/2018 609-49750-433300 27.19 03/27/2018 609-49750-433300 2,048.19 03/27/2018 609-49750-425100 651.65 03/27/2018 609-49750-425100 20.86 03/27/2018 609-49750-433300 61.20 03/27/2018 609-49750-433300 Reference ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (03/21/2018 - 3:16 PM) Page 6 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number 5958635 resale - liquor 6,799.91 03/27/2018 609-49750-425100 5958636 resale - wine 1,910.55 03/27/2018 609-49750-425300 5958636 freight 64.06 03/27/2018 609-49750-433300 5959710 freight 49.41 03/27/2018 609-49750-433300 5959710 resale - liquor 4,266.06 03/27/2018 609-49750-425100 5959711 resale - wine 1,126.40 03/27/2018 609-49750-425300 5959711 resale - wine n/a 70.40 03/27/2018 609-49750-425400 5959711 freight 26.82 03/27/2018 609-49750-433300 5962253 freight 62.58 03/27/2018 609-49750-433300 5962253 resale - liquor 2,686.57 03/27/2018 609-49750-425100 5962254 resale - wine 196.65 03/27/2018 609-49750-425300 5962254 freight 5.96 03/27/2018 609-49750-433300 5962255 resale - beer 60.00 03/27/2018 609-49750-425200 669976 freight credit inv. #5949335 -0.25 03/27/2018 609-49750-433300 670414 freight credit inv. #5948137 -1.49 03/27/2018 609-49750-433300 670414 resale -liquor credit inv.#5948137 -372.04 03/27/2018 609-49750-425100 671472 resale - liquor credit inv. #5958635 -525.00 03/27/2018 609-49750-425100 671472 freight credit inv. #5958635 -4.47 03/27/2018 609-49750-433300 Check Total: 28,418.43 Vendor: 1741 KENNETH KAKO Check Sequence: 34 03/12/18 Training 2/26/18 - meal & mileage 121.83 03/27/2018 101-42200-433100 Check Total: 121.83 Vendor: 1270 KENNEDY AND GRAVEN CHARTERED Check Sequence: 35 MN190-00101 General EDA Matters thru 2/28/18 266.00 03/27/2018 213-46301-430400 MN190-00115 Landmark Square thru 2/28/18 361.00 03/27/2018 213-46301-430400 MN325-00035 103 Pine St thru 2/28/18 1,894.00 03/27/2018 213-46301-430400 MN325-00036 224 East 4th St thru 2/28/18 406.00 03/27/2018 213-46301-430400 MN325-00037 255 East Broadway St thru 2/28/18 849.75 03/27/2018 213-46301-430400 MN325-00038 112 W River Street thru 2/28/18 1,494.75 03/27/2018 213-46301-430400 Check Total: 5,271.50 Vendor: 3829 STEVE LANGANKI Check Sequence: 36 1102 (6) porta toilet rental- 1/24-2/20/18 388.50 03/27/2018 101-45201-431990 Check Total: 388.50 Vendor: 1290 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES Check Sequence: 37 269292 MN Cities Stormwater Coalition Contributions- 760.00 03/27/2018 101-43130-443300 269628 Registration: Preventing Harassment/Promoting 15.00 03/27/2018 101-41110-433100 Reference ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: False AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (03/21/2018 - 3:16 PM) Page 7 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 775.00 Check Total: Vendor: 4456 LUPULIN BREWING LLC 11055 resale - beer Check Total: Vendor: 1303 M AMUNDSON CIGAR & CANDY CO, LLP 254499 resale - cigarettes 254499 resale - tobacco; soda pop; bottle wraps; barware Check Total: Vendor: 1304 M J DONOVAN ENTERPRISES 119709 Reflective ZX & Helmet Logo - Polaris Fire DeI Check Total: Vendor: 2819 MADDEN GALANTER HANSEN LLP Feb 2018 Labor Relations Services - Prep Audit Letter - R 03/27/2018 Check Total: Vendor: 1229 MARRS ADVERTISING & DESIGN INC 1511 Business Cards - SD 609-49750-425400 Check Total: Vendor: 3745 MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 202654366 (400) gal unleaded @ $2.25/gal. 20654365 (900) gal diesel @ $2.52/gal. Check Total: Vendor: 1308 MARCOINC 353024441 3/10/18 - 4/10/18 Contract Payment 353024441 Nov/Dec Invoice Adjustment Check Total: Vendor: 1330 CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS 400451001901 Feb 2018 - Monti Pawn Transactions (214) Check Total: AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (03/21/2018 - 3:16 PM) Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 775.00 Check Sequence: 38 ACH Enabled: True 360.00 03/27/2018 609-49750-425200 360.00 Check Sequence: 39 ACH Enabled: True 1,245.55 03/27/2018 609-49750-425500 950.41 03/27/2018 609-49750-425400 2,195.96 Check Sequence: 40 ACH Enabled: False 85.43 03/27/2018 101-42200-421990 85.43 Check Sequence: 41 ACH Enabled: False 45.00 03/27/2018 101-41540-430100 45.00 Check Sequence: 42 ACH Enabled: True 74.50 03/27/2018 226-45122-421990 74.50 Check Sequence: 43 ACH Enabled: True 898.57 03/27/2018 101-43120-421200 2,265.30 03/27/2018 101-43120-421200 3,163.87 Check Sequence: 44 ACH Enabled: True 2,458.34 03/27/2018 702-00000-441500 270.88 03/27/2018 702-00000-441500 2,729.22 Check Sequence: 45 ACH Enabled: True 192.60 03/27/2018 101-42100-431990 192.60 Page 8 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Vendor: 1377 MONTICELLO SENIOR CENTER Check Sequence: 46 ACH Enabled: True March 2018 Monthly Allocation - March 2018 5,013.33 03/27/2018 101-45175-444310 Check Total: 5,013.33 Vendor: 1401 NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS Check Sequence: 47 ACH Enabled: True 23468 Feb 2018 - Technical Assistance - City Projects 5,252.96 03/27/2018 101-41910-431990 23469 201815 - Residental Prop Devel - Feb 2018 600.24 03/27/2018 101-00000-220110 23469 201806 - Otter Creek 6th Addition Plat - Feb 201 1,270.50 03/27/2018 101-00000-220110 23469 201801 - Kjellberg PUD - School Blvd Resident 165.00 03/27/2018 101-41910-431990 23469 201813 - Arch Mgmt Multi Family- Feb 2018 484.74 03/27/2018 101-00000-220110 23469 201808 - Briggs Multi Family - Feb 2018 676.50 03/27/2018 101-00000-220110 23470 Feb 2018 - Technical Assistance - Meetings 150.00 03/27/2018 101-41910-431990 23471 Feb 2018 - Technical Assistance - CCD Zoning I 1,798.50 03/27/2018 101-41910-431990 Check Total: 10,398.44 Vendor: 1411 OLSON & SONS ELECTRIC INC Check Sequence: 48 ACH Enabled: True 18520 4th St Hockey- lamp; photo cell 48.22 03/27/2018 101-45201-421650 Check Total: 48.22 Vendor: 4920 ELISABETH PARGA Check Sequence: 49 ACH Enabled: False 1864014 Sales Tax Refund 3.29 03/27/2018 226-00000-208100 1864014 Membership Fee Refund 44.71 03/27/2018 226-45127-347910 1864014 Childcare Refund 32.00 03/27/2018 226-45127-347905 Check Total: 80.00 Vendor: 1273 PAUSTIS & SONS WINE CO Check Sequence: 50 ACH Enabled: False 3483 resale - wine 831.00 03/27/2018 609-49750-425300 3483 freight 10.00 03/27/2018 609-49750-433300 Check Total: 841.00 Vendor: 4633 PERFORMANCE FOOD GROUP INC Check Sequence: 51 ACH Enabled: True 51258158 Cheese Sauce for Concession 112.74 03/27/2018 226-45125-425410 Check Total: 112.74 Vendor: 1427 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS CO Check Sequence: 52 ACH Enabled: False 2318961 resale - liquor 3,308.95 03/27/2018 609-49750-425100 2318961 freight 42.02 03/27/2018 609-49750-433300 2318962 freight 11.92 03/27/2018 609-49750-433300 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (03/21/2018 - 3:16 PM) Page 9 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 2318962 resale- wine 344.00 03/27/2018 609-49750-425300 2319806 resale- liquor 1,465.82 03/27/2018 609-49750-425100 2319806 freight 15.27 03/27/2018 609-49750-433300 2319807 freight 23.84 03/27/2018 609-49750-433300 2319807 resale- wine 948.65 03/27/2018 609-49750-425300 2319807 resale- mix 50.28 03/27/2018 609-49750-425400 2321514 freight 12.22 03/27/2018 609-49750-433300 2321514 resale - liquor 935.80 03/27/2018 609-49750-425100 2321515 resale- wine 794.75 03/27/2018 609-49750-425300 2321515 freight 26.82 03/27/2018 609-49750-433300 2322490 freight 52.64 03/27/2018 609-49750-433300 2322490 resale- liquor 3,140.34 03/27/2018 609-49750-425100 2322491 resale- wine 1,238.00 03/27/2018 609-49750-425300 2322491 freight 37.25 03/27/2018 609-49750-433300 2323309 freight 30.55 03/27/2018 609-49750-433300 2323309 resale - liquor 2,452.03 03/27/2018 609-49750-425100 2323310 resale- wine 546.00 03/27/2018 609-49750-425300 2323310 resale - wine n/a 128.00 03/27/2018 609-49750-425400 2323310 freight 14.90 03/27/2018 609-49750-433300 2325214 freight 13.41 03/27/2018 609-49750-433300 2325214 resale - liquor 1,286.45 03/27/2018 609-49750-425100 Check Total: 16,919.91 Vendor: 4917 PREMIER LIGHTING, INC. Check Sequence: 53 ACH Enabled: False 44083 (135) LED lights- $9,092.25 Xcel Rebate. 11-27 19,616.00 03/27/2018 245-43162-453010 Check Total: 19,616.00 Vendor: 1442 PURCELL PLUMBING AND HEATING INC Check Sequence: 54 ACH Enabled: False 38919 Adjusted Ignitor & Flame Sensor; Replaced IDF 1,032.11 03/27/2018 101-42700-440100 Check Total: 1,032.11 Vendor: 4022 REINHART FOODSERVICE LLC Check Sequence: 55 ACH Enabled: True 220919 Food for Concession Resale 295.59 03/27/2018 226-45125-425410 228304 Food for Concession Resale 665.31 03/27/2018 226-45125-425410 Check Total: 960.90 Vendor: 4919 RIGHT 4 YOUR BUSINESS LLC Check Sequence: 56 ACH Enabled: False 372 Respectful Workplace: Communication & Conve 1,500.00 03/27/2018 101-41800-431960 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (03/21/2018 - 3:16 PM) Page 10 Invoice No Description Check Total: Vendor: 1059 TILLER CORPORATION AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (03/21/2018 - 3:16 PM) Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 1,500.00 Check Total: Vendor: 1474 PATRICIA A SALZWEDEL Mar 2nd Semi Monthly Contract Payment Check Total: Vendor: 4071 JOSH SAMUELSON 03/05/18 Training 3/2-4/2018 - Mankato- Courtyard; meal 1,593.75 Check Total: Vendor: 4918 SOLENIS LLC 131275825 Praestol- WWTP 1,593.75 Check Total: Vendor: 3309 SOUTHERN GLAZER'S WINE AND SPIRITS. 1657119 resale - liquor 1657119 freight 1657120 resale - wine 1657120 freight 1659838 freight 1659838 resale - liquor 1659839 freight 1659839 resale - wine 9135963 CR resale - liquor inv. #1659838 9136047 CR freight credit inv. #1659838 Check Total: Vendor: 2564 SPORTS PRO LLC 128 Pedal Taper Trio (2); Post Plunger Brake (2); Pol 7,379.30 Check Total: Vendor: 1518 TDS TELECOM 763-271-3257 TDS 763-295-2005 TDS 763-295-3714 TDS Check Total: Vendor: 1059 TILLER CORPORATION AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (03/21/2018 - 3:16 PM) Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 1,500.00 Check Sequence: 57 ACH Enabled: True 1,593.75 03/27/2018 101-42700-431200 1,593.75 Check Sequence: 58 ACH Enabled: True 538.87 03/27/2018 101-42200-433100 538.87 Check Sequence: 59 ACH Enabled: False 7,379.30 03/27/2018 602-49480-421990 7,379.30 Check Sequence: 60 ACH Enabled: False 3,472.66 03/27/2018 609-49750-425100 39.43 03/27/2018 609-49750-433300 828.00 03/27/2018 609-49750-425300 21.46 03/27/2018 609-49750-433300 19.60 03/27/2018 609-49750-433300 2,173.04 03/27/2018 609-49750-425100 37.80 03/27/2018 609-49750-433300 1,700.00 03/27/2018 609-49750-425300 -171.34 03/27/2018 609-49750-425100 -1.40 03/27/2018 609-49750-433300 8,119.25 Check Sequence: 61 ACH Enabled: True 797.97 03/27/2018 226-45126-422990 797.97 Check Sequence: 62 ACH Enabled: True 95.31 03/27/2018 702-00000-432100 19.14 03/27/2018 702-00000-432100 338.37 03/27/2018 702-00000-432100 452.82 Check Sequence: 63 ACH Enabled: False Page 11 Invoice No Description 180315 (46.72) T washed sand Check Total: Vendor: 1561 WATER LABORATORIES INC 6696 Feb. 2018 Water Testing Amount Payment Date Check Total: Vendor: 4895 TRI MARK HOCKENBERGS 99NRX-N 101-43125-421700 asst. bags; paper plates; coffee Check Total: Vendor: 1627 TWIN CITY OPTICAL 40251 Glasses - L. Schroden- employee portion 40251 Check Sequence: 64 Glasses - L. Schroden- city portion Enabled: False Check Total: Vendor: 1544 US POSTAL SERVICE 3/8/2018 PI 42 - UB March Billing (3,739 pcs) (1/2) 3/8/2018 PI 42 - UB March Billing (3,739 pcs) (1/2) Check Total: Vendor: 1550 VEOLIA WATER N AM OPERATING SERV L 90141866 False April 2018 WWTP Operations & Maintenance 90142332 101-00000-115030 Oct - Dec 2017 Cargill Lab Testing Check Total: Vendor: 1552 VIKING COCA COLA BOTTLING CO 2117224 resale - soda pop 2117322 resale - soda pop Check Total: Vendor: 1684 VINOCOPIA 201988 False resale - liquor 201988 601-49440-432200 freight 202517 resale - liquor 202517 602-49490-432200 freight 202518 freight 202518 resale - wine Check Total: Vendor: 1561 WATER LABORATORIES INC 6696 Feb. 2018 Water Testing Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 256.96 03/27/2018 101-43125-421700 256.96 Check Sequence: 64 ACH Enabled: False 327.07 03/27/2018 609-49754-421990 327.07 Check Sequence: 65 ACH Enabled: False 113.75 03/27/2018 101-00000-115030 62.95 03/27/2018 101-45201-421110 176.70 Check Sequence: 66 ACH Enabled: False 856.23 03/27/2018 601-49440-432200 856.23 03/27/2018 602-49490-432200 1,712.46 Check Sequence: 67 ACH Enabled: True 55,145.50 03/27/2018 602-49480-430800 4,407.55 03/27/2018 602-00000-202010 59,553.05 Check Sequence: 68 ACH Enabled: True 506.50 03/27/2018 609-49750-425400 304.15 03/27/2018 609-49750-425400 810.65 Check Sequence: 69 ACH Enabled: True 395.50 03/27/2018 609-49750-425100 10.00 03/27/2018 609-49750-433300 106.00 03/27/2018 609-49750-425100 2.50 03/27/2018 609-49750-433300 20.00 03/27/2018 609-49750-433300 904.00 03/27/2018 609-49750-425300 1,438.00 Check Sequence: 70 ACH Enabled: False 240.00 03/27/2018 601-49440-422740 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (03/21/2018 - 3:16 PM) Page 12 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Check Total: 240.00 Vendor: 4215 WILD MOUNTAIN WINERY, INC. Check Sequence: 71 ACH Enabled: False 1653 resale - wine 114.00 03/27/2018 609-49750-425300 Check Total: 114.00 Vendor: 1572 THE WINE COMPANY Check Sequence: 72 ACH Enabled: True 65194 resale- wine 184.00 03/27/2018 609-49750-425300 65194 freight 5.00 03/27/2018 609-49750-433300 Check Total: 189.00 Vendor: 1573 WINE MERCHANTS INC Check Sequence: 73 ACH Enabled: False 7173490 freight 8.94 03/27/2018 609-49750-433300 7173490 resale - wine 492.00 03/27/2018 609-49750-425300 7173676 resale - wine 424.22 03/27/2018 609-49750-425300 7173676 freight 1.98 03/27/2018 609-49750-433300 7174544 resale - wine 1,278.81 03/27/2018 609-49750-425300 7174544 freight 3.73 03/27/2018 609-49750-433300 Check Total: 2,209.68 Vendor: 1579 WRIGHT COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPARTMEN Check Sequence: 74 ACH Enabled: False 1035 (6) swingaways; (6) ticket posts 13,342.14 03/27/2018 101-43125-421700 Check Total: 13,342.14 The preceding list of bills payables was reviewed and approved for payment. Total for Check Run: 317,916.88 Date: 3/26/18 Approved by: Mayor Brian Stumpf Total of Number of Checks: 74 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (03/21/2018 - 3:16 PM) Page 13 City Council Agenda 3/26/2018 2B. Consideration of approving new hires and departures for Citv departments (TE) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The Council is asked to ratify the hiring and departures of employees that have occurred recently in the departments listed. It is recommended that the Council officially ratify the hiring/departure of all listed employees including part-time and seasonal workers. By ratifying departures, the council also approves the expenditure for final amounts due to terminated and otherwise departing employees. Al. Budget Impact: (positions are generally included in budget) A2. Staff Work Load Impact: If new positions, there may be some training involved. If terminated positions, existing staff would pick up those hours, as needed, until replaced. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to ratify the hire/departures of the employees as identified on the attached list. 2. Motion to deny the recommended hires and departures. C. RECOMMENDATION: By statute the City Council has the authority to approve all hires/departures. City staff recommends Alternative #1, for the Council to approve the hires and/or departures as listed. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • List of new/terminated employees NEW EMPLOYEES Name Title Department Hire Date Class Tyler Lambert Street Maintenance Operator Streets 3/19/2018 FT TERMINATING EMPLOYEES Name Reason Department Last Day Class Sarah Sailer Voluntary MCC 10/2/17 PT Theresa Wagner Voluntary MCC 2/10/18 PT Jakob Ramert-Thompson Voluntary MCC 3/4/18 PT Shannon Callaghan Voluntary MCC 3/17/18 PT Carolyn Bariball Voluntary MCC 3/30/18 Seasonal New Hire and Terms City Council 2018.xlsx: 3/20/2018 City Council Agenda 3/26/2018 2C. Consideration of approving the sale or disposal of surplus Citv property (WO) There is no report this City Council cycle. City Council Agenda 03/26/2018 2D. Consideration of approving a Special Event Permit application and allowing the use of the Citv Commuter Lot and related assistance for a recvcling event on April 28, 2018. Applicant, Jason Warehime, Metro Appliance Recvcling (JS/PW) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The City Council is asked to consider approval of a special event permit for a recycling day hosted by Metro Appliance Recycling. This event is hosted by Metro Appliance Recycling as a private company and is open to the public and not limited to city residents. The event is proposed to run from 8 a.m. to 1 p.m. in the City Commuter Parking Lot on Deegan Avenue, as outlined in the applicant's narrative. Metro Recycling has coordinated this event for the recycling of appliances, furniture, tires, and electronics for the past four years. Similar to prior years, the applicant is requesting the use of the full commuter parking lot. Metro Appliance is also requesting to have the special event permit fee waived. Staff has met with Muller Theatres for approval to use the gravel portion of their parking lot for public parking the day of the event. Public Works will place a reader sign at the commuter parking lot two weeks in advance directing patrons to those two locations on the day of the event. Al. Budget Impact: The applicant is requesting that the City waive the event permit and temporary sign permit. Council will note that temporary sign permit fees have not typically been waived for other events. As such, the approval below does not include the waiver for sign fee. A2. Staff Workload Impact: Staff time will be required to place the reader sign at the lot prior to the event and to take down the sign following the event. This event will require very little staff time for placing signs and notifications. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the Special Event Permit for Metro Appliance Recycling allowing temporary use of the City's Commuter Parking Lot on Deegan Avenue on Saturday, April 28, 2018, for a recycling event, including waiver of special event permit fee. Approval is contingent on: a) Continued coordination on site plan and event operations with Street Superintendent b) Submission of certificate of liability coverage with City named as additional insured for event. 2. Motion to deny the Special Event Permit for Metro Appliance Recycling allowing temporary use of the City's Commuter Parking Lot on Deegan Avenue on Saturday, April 28, 2018. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends Alternative #1 for the approval of the Special Event Permit for Metro Appliance Recycling to host a recycling event Saturday, April 28, 2018. Feedback from residents has been positive and they appreciate having this service City Council Agenda 03/26/2018 D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Applicant Narrative B. Applicant Site Plan and Layout CITY caN Monticello CITY OF MONTICELLO Community Development 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1 Monticello, MN 55362 (763) 295-2711 . info(a ei.monticello.mn.us Property Address Property Legal Description Property ID Number Owner Name Owner Address Owner Phone Owner Email Applicant Name Applicant Address Applicant Phone Applicant Email Name of Event Location/Address of Event Dates & Times of Event 9250 Deegan Ave. Commuter Parking lot 1555164000020 City of Monticello 1 505 Walnut St. 1763-295-3060 Metro Appliance Recycling 16403 60th St. NE Otsego Special Event Permit Application Checklist 763-241-8787 jason@thinkgreemmn.com Monticello Recycles Day Commuter Parking Lot 9250 Deegan Ave. Monticello Saturday April 28 8AM-1 PM Complete Application Required The review and consideration of an application submitted shall only occur if such application includes all items that are required in support of the application and is deemed complete by the City Clerk's Office. Application Submission Schedule Application, required information, and payment must be submitted no later than 30 working days prior to desired approval date. Application Information Applicants shall note that in addition to a special event permits, any liquor license or permit, sign permits and building permits for tents may also be required and are not included within the special event permit application and approval. Any requested use of City facilities, City staff resources, City equipment, and/or City property (including rights of way) and/or any requested waiver of application fee or park rental fees requires review and approval by the City Council. In addition, events which occur after 10 PM may requires review and approval by the City Council as related to noise ordinances. Please provide clear information in the application regarding these requests. 07/25/16 ,! NOW I am the fee title owner of the described property and I agree to this application. I certify that I am in compliance with all ordinance requirements and conditions regarding other City approval that have been previously granted. (Signature) (Date) This application shall be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding the application. I have completed all of the applicable filing requirements and I hereby acknowledge that I have read and fully understand the applicable provisions of the City Ordinances and current policies related to this application and that the documents and information I have submitted are true and correct. (Signature) U--Ia44.� (Date) 319/20 8 (Community Development Director Signature) Special Event Permit Approval is granted with the following conditions: liftaW reviewa wKIldiist leas applIitable). Public Works Routing Law Enforcement Notification Building Department Monticello Community (renter Room/Par, Reservations Post -Approval Routina/Requir+ements Applicant Public Works Law Enforcement Notification City Clerk Monticello Community Center Room/Park Reservations Liability Insurance Certificate Received Surrounding Property Owner Notification Complete (Date) Approved ❑ I Denied ❑ Admin Parks Streets Director 07/25/15 4 Appliance Recycling $11 Computers � & Elect�"onics Think 'reenMN.com +763-241-8787 Monticello Recycles Day is a single day event in which Metro Appliance Recycling sets up trucks, trailers, and dumpsters in a designated parking lot were residence can bring in Appliances, computers, electronics, and other items for recycling. The city has agreed in the past to use the commuter parking lot located at 9250 Deegan Ave. for this event. The city has agreed to place a signage sign on location in advance to let residence know that the parking lot will be closed for the day of the event. The city of Monticello has agreed, in the past, to promote the event via their website, digital sign boards, utility billing, city council meeting, and any other means available to the city to inform the residence. Metro Appliance Recycling will place an advertising sign on location in advance to promote the event. We will supply all equipment and staff necessary to operate the event. Equipment will be set up the morning of the event then removed by the end of the event day. We leave the parking lot in the same condition as we found it and leave no rubbish behind. The event is scheduled to run from 8am —1 pm. We also request that the city of Monticello waive the special permit and temporary sign permit fees charged by the city. Any question may be directed to Jason Warehime at 763-241-8787. �C Q) m C7 ai a Lr) L v bO _ O p O ) J L E E O U City Council Agenda: 03/26/18 2E. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2018-19 advocating support for certain legislative issues and priorities for 2018 (JO/JS) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The City Council is asked to consider a joint cities resolution identifying key legislative priorities for cities in the region. Staff has been working with the City of Becker to identify common issues and common positions that the region should support or oppose during the 2018 legislative session. Other cities have also been contacted. The legislation and initiatives identified for advocacy via the resolution were in large part derived from the 2018 League of MN Cities Policies Document. The advocacy items presented to you within the proposed resolution represent a small fraction of the topics/policies identified by the LMC and were selected based on staff prioritization. It is our hope that the list is not so long that our message becomes diluted. The 2018 League of MN Policies Document is readily available on the LMC website if you are interested in learning more. It is understood that each city will not agree with every position and may alter their resolution slightly. In addition, Monticello may support additional specific legislation that will be handled via individual resolutions. Al. Budget Impact: The issues presented could have various impacts on the level of funding for cities and flexibility in revenue sources for cities. A2. Staff Workload Impact: Minimal. A3. Strategic Plan Impact: Demonstrating Monticello's goal to be a regional leader by working with area cities on legislation that will benefit our region. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to adopt Resolution 2018-19 advocating support for certain legislative issues and priorities for 2018. 2. Motion to deny. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The City Administrator recommends alternative 1. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Draft Resolution 2018-19 B. Excerpts from LMC Policies and Draft Legislation of the Rail Service Improvement Account CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2018-19 Resolution of the Cities of Monticello, , Advocating Support for Certain Legislative Issues and Proposals WHEREAS, to better assist our State legislative leaders, we have collectively identified certain legislative issues and proposals that are of specific impact and interest to our communities to enable them to respond in a manner that strengthens our local units of government and the State in fostering the continuation and enhancement of our socially, economically and culturally vibrant communities. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Councils of Monticello, , that the following legislative issues and proposals are of interest or concern to the local area and therefore officially support and advocate the following actions of the MN State Legislature: GENERAL POLICY AND LEGISLATIVE ISSUES: POLICY PROPOSALS State Mandate Relief (LMC SD -1 & 2): SUPPORT legislation that reduces or eliminates unfunded and/or onerous mandates to local governments. No additional mandates should be enacted unless the legislature or agency imposing the requirements provides a permanent stable revenue source for the mandate. 2. Adequate Funding for Transportation (LMC LE -33): SUPPORT legislation that provides local units of government access to resources and funding tools to meet growing needs. 3. Growth Management and Annexation (LMC LE -1): SUPPORT guiding growth and development through local plans and control. The state should not adopt a mandatory comprehensive statewide planning process. 4. Broadband (LMC LE -16): SUPPORT funding for statewide broadband. Right-of-Wav Management (LMC LE -18): OPPOSE efforts to further restrict local government authority over public right-of-way. 6. Public Infrastructure Utilities (LMC LE -32): SUPPORT efforts to authorize cities to create and impose charges for service to ensure funding for maintenance infrastructure. 7. Administrative Fines for Code Violations (LMC SD -15): SUPPORT the use of administrative fines for local regulatory ordinances, such as buildings codes, zoning codes, health codes, public nuisance ordinances, etc. 8. Organized Solid Waste Collection (SD -23): OPPOSE legislation that would allow inverse condemnation claims to city solid waste contracting decisions. 9. Impaired Waters (SD -65): SUPPORT equitable funding solutions for the design and implementation of Minnesota's impaired waters program. 10. Economic Development/Redevelopment (LMC LE -9, LE -22, LE -23, LE -24, LE -25, LE - 26, LE -27, LE -30): SUPPORT tools for economic development and redevelopment by supporting business and industry through statutes and programs for affordable and workplace housing and OPPOSE levy limits on tax increment financing and tax abatement. 11. Carbon Reduction Facilities — Nuclear Enerav: SUPPORT legislation that will allow public utilities to recover costs. 12. Government Data Practices and Data Retention (LMC DP -1): SUPPORT legislation that addresses the growing and costly impact on cities of providing access to specific public data housed in large electronic databases. FUNDING PROPOSALS 1. Expansion of I-94 to Monticello: Continue to FUND lane expansions of I-94 from St. Michael to Monticello. 2. Improve connectivitv between TH 10 and I-94: Support funding for improved connectivity between TH 10 and I-94. TH 25 is heavily used traffic trout for freight vehicles. 3. Inland Rail Economic Development and Job Stabilization & Growth Act of 2018: support funding and/or programs to address economic development and improvements surrounding inland rail. Adopted this day of _ _ ,2018, by the City Councils of the Cities of City of Monticello Mayor City Administrator City of Mayor City Administrator LE -33. Adequate Funding for Transportation Issue: A well -coordinated state transportation policy utilizing all modes of transportation in moving passengers and freight will enhance the state economic development of new and expanding business as well as foster additional tourism opportunities. Response: More resources must be dedicated to all components of the state's transportation system, and local units of government must have access to resources and funding tools to meet growing needs. The League of Minnesota Cities supports: a) Development of a comprehensive state transportation policy which provides an environment where all modes of transportation (motor, rail, air, water and pipeline) complement each other in moving passengers and freight within the state. b) A dedicated and sustainable state revenue source for non -municipal state aid city streets. c) The Statewide Transportation Plan 2009-2028 developed by the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT). d) MVST distribution of 60 percent for roads and bridges and 40 percent for transit. e) A permanent increase in the gas tax. f) Indexing of the gas tax, provided there is a limit on how much the tax can be increased for inflation in a given amount of time. g) Increases in vehicle registration taxes (tab fees). h) Trunk highway bonding provided the Legislature implements reasonable restrictions on the amount of debt service the state will incur, and provided the Legislature appropriates funding to assist with local costs related to projects funded with trunk highway bonds. i) General obligation bonding for local roads and bridges, particularly for routes of regional significance. j) A sales tax increase dedicated to transportation. k) Funding to assist cities burdened by cost participation responsibilities imposed by improvement projects on the state's principal arterial system and on the county state aid highway (CSAH) system. 1) Funding for transportation components of economic development and redevelopment projects. m) Full funding for all components of state highway projects, including related stormwater management systems, through state sources. n) Funding to build roads to standards that can accommodate the year-round transport of heavy loads. o) A sales tax exemption for materials purchased for state and local road, bridge, sidewalk, trail and transit construction projects. p) Authority for cities to impose development impact fees for transportation infrastructure. q) Local funding options that would allow cities to raise revenues for roads, bridges, sidewalks, trails, and transit. r) Expanded use of alternative revenue sources such as MnPASS and other tolling mechanisms for funding of maintenance and construction (where feasibility studies indicate the program is appropriate). LE -1. Growth Management and Annexation Issue: Unplanned and uncontrolled growth has a negative environmental, fiscal, and governmental impact on cities, counties, and the state because it increases the cost of providing government services and results in the loss of natural resource areas and prime agricultural land. Response: The League of Minnesota Cities believes the existing framework for guiding growth and development primarily through local plans and controls adopted by local governments should form the basis of a statewide planning policy, and that the state should not adopt a mandatory comprehensive statewide planning process. Rather, the state should: a) Provide additional financial and technical assistance to local governments for cooperative planning and growth management issues, particularly where new comprehensive plans have been mandated by the Legislature; b) Keep comprehensive planning timelines on a ten-year cycle due to the financial and workload impacts these processes place on cities; c) Clearly establish the public purposes served by existing statewide controls, such as shore land zoning and wetlands conservation; clarify, simplify, and streamline these controls; eliminate duplication in their administration; and fully defend and hold harmless any local government sued for a "taking" as a result of executing state land -use policies; d) Give cities broader authority to extend their zoning, subdivision, and other land -use controls outside the city's boundaries, regardless of the existence of county or township controls, to ensure conformance with city facilities and services; e) Clearly define and differentiate between urban and rural development and restrict urban growth without municipal services or annexation agreements outside city boundaries. This should contain a requirement that counties and joint power districts that provide sewer, water, and other services, which have been traditionally provided by cities, include as a condition of providing service the annexation of properties that are the recipients of such services in cases where annexation is requested by a city that could feasibly be providing those services; f) Facilitate the annexation of urban land to cities by amending state statutes that regulate annexation to make it easier for cities to annex developed or developing land within unincorporated areas; g) Oppose legislation that would reinstate the election requirement in contested annexations; h) Support legislation to prohibit detachment of parcels from cities unless approval of the detachment has been granted by both the affected city and township and the affected county has been notified prior to the city and township acting on the request; i) Oppose legislation that allows orderly annexation agreements to be adopted that prohibit annexation by other cities of property not being annexed under the agreement; j) Encourage ideas consistent with the long-term goal of allowing urban development only in urban areas. Density incentives such as sprawl -reduction aid programs are more straightforward methods of rewarding and encouraging compact urban development than using local government aid (LGA) for another new purpose; and k) Establish stricter criteria on the amount cities can pay to townships as part of an orderly annexation agreement so that payments to townships are limited to reimbursement for lost property tax base for no more than a fixed number of years, documented stranded assessments, and other items for which there is a clear nexus. LE -16. Broadband Issue: High-speed Internet is essential infrastructure needed by cities to compete in a global economy. Yet many communities do not have access to broadband at affordable prices. High fixed costs, low density, and short-term return -on -investment thresholds for private sector providers contribute to the lack of broadband across the state. Investing in universal broadband access has substantial local and regional economic benefits for communities of all sizes. Cities and other local units of government are facilitating the deployment of broadband services to increase connectivity, reliability, availability, and affordability for residents and businesses through a variety of models, including municipal broadband and public-private partnerships. However, attempts have been made to restrict cities from providing telecommunications services, particularly in unserved or underserved areas. Recent court cases have overturned interpretation by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) that states may not limit the extension of municipal broadband services from one city to another. Due to the high costs of broadband infrastructure, the state has expanded its role to identify and formulate tools to expand broadband access. The Office of Broadband Development within the Department of Employment and Economic Development (DEED) created in 2013 formally established a partnership between the state and local communities to deploy high- speed Internet in unserved and underserved areas. The Office supports broadband expansion through broadband mapping and managing the state's broadband grant program. Additional state action occurred during the 2016 legislative session when the legislature reestablished state speed and adoption goals under Minn. Stat. § 237.012. In addition to the state's focus on extending broadband to unserved areas, Minnesota must also be on the cutting edge for next - generation broadband investments. Response: To promote economic development and achieve state broadband goals, the Legislature, Governor's office, and state agencies should: a) Identify and implement actions for the state to reach and maintain a position in the top five states for broadband speed that is universaily accessible to residents and businesses; b) Make significant investments to the Border -to -Border Broadband Grant Program and continue to encourage public/private sector collaboration; c) Support measures to authorize and encourage cities and other local units of government to play a direct role in providing broadband services; d) Remove barriers to the exercise of local authority to provide such services, including repeal of Minn. Stat. § 237.19, that requires a supermajority voter approval for the provision of local phone service by a local unit of government; e) Offer incentives to private sector service providers to respond to llocai or regionall needs and to collaborate with cities and other public entities to deploy broadband infrastructure capable of delivering sufficient bandwidth and capacity to meet immediate and future local needs; f) Adopt policies which seek to position Minnesota as a state of choice for testing next -generation broadband technologies; g) Affirm that cities have the authority to partner with private entities to finance broadband infrastructure using city bonding authority; h) Remove barriers, restrict anti-competitive practices, and prevent predatory action that prevent or impede cities, municipal utilities, schools, libraries, and other public sector entities from collaborating and deploying broadband infrastructure and services at the local and regional level; i) Continuously update and verify comprehensive statewide street -level mapping of broadband services to identify underserved areas and connectivity issues; and j) Recognize the crucial role of local government in the work of the Governor's Broadband Task Force and fund the Office of Broadband Development to help achieve significantly higher broadband speeds and to ensure that robust and affordable Internet connectivity is widely available. On the federal level, the League urges Congress to adopt laws restoring the ability of municipalities to extend beyond their borders to serve unserved and underserved areas. LE -18. Right -of -Way Management Issue: Cities hold local rights-of-way in trust for the public as an increasingly scarce and valuable asset. As demand increases for use of rights-of-way for underground wired and overhead wireless facilities and sites for wireless communications, cities must coordinate the use of this resource among competing uses and to manage the use of PROWs for delivery of essential municipal utility services. Local management responsibilities vary and are site specific, underscoring the necessity for maintaining local authority. Minnesota's Telecommunications Right -of -Way User Law was amended during the 2017 Session with legislation creating a separate permitting system for placement of small wireless facilities on city -owned structures in the public right-of-way. The new law clarified that wireless providers are telecommunications right-of-way users and maintained cities' right-of-way management authority, but limitations were imposed on cities' compensation through rent and timelines for processing small wireless facilities permits. Response: Minn. Stat. §§ 237.162-.163 worked well for many years, but Minnesota was a part of a nationwide effort by wireless providers to pass laws providing them with easier access to public rights-of-way and city -owned infrastructure. While Minnesota's law maintains more local control than those passed in many other states, the League of Minnesota Cities opposes efforts to further restrict local government authority over the public right-of-way. Furthermore, the Federal Communications Commission is undergoing review of Telecommunications Act rules and policies related to local government regulatory authority. State and federal policymakers and regulators should: a) Uphold local authority to manage and protect public rights-of-way, including reasonable zoning and subdivision regulation and the exercise of local police powers; b) Recognize that cities have a paramount role in developing, locating, siting, and enforcing utility construction and safety standards; c) Support local authority to require reimbursement and compensation from service providers for managing use of public rights-of-way; d) Maintain city authority to franchise gas, electric, cable, telecommunications and broadband services, open video systems and all other wireline programming platforms and services and to collect franchise fees and alternative revenue streams to support maintenance and management of the traveled portion of the PROW and other public services of importance to communities; e) Encourage a collaborative process with stakeholders, including cities, to determine any revised standards if needed; f) Recognize that as rights-of-way become more crowded, the costs of disrupting critical infrastructure become evident and the exercise of local authority to manage competing demands and ensure public safety in the PROWS becomes increasingly important; g) Ensure the removal of abandoned equipment and accompanying support structures by the service providers from the public right-of-way; h) Maintain the courts as the primary forum for resolving disputes over the exercise of such authority; and i) Maintain existing local authority to review and approve or deny plans for installation or relocation of additional wires or cables on in-place utility poles. In the alternative, cities should have broader authority to require the underground placement of new and/or existing services at the cost of the utility or telecommunications provider. LE -32. Public Infrastructure Utilities Issue: Successful economic development efforts and community stability are dependent upon a city's ability to make infrastructure investments. Current infrastructure funding options available to cities are inadequate and unsustainable. Funding pressures have been exacerbated by levy limits, unallotment and reductions in the local government aid and market value homestead credit programs. The existing special assessment law, Minn. Stat. Ch. 429, does not meet cities' financing needs because of the special benefit requirement. The law also requires a bond election unless a minimum of 20 percent of such a project can be specially assessed against affected properties due to the increase in fair market value or "benefit" from the project. In practice, however, proof of increased property value to this degree of benefit can rarely be proven from regular repair or replacement of existing infrastructure such as streets or sidewalks. Alternatives to the Minn. Stat. Ch. 429 methods for financing infrastructure improvements are nearly nonexistent. The Legislature has given cities the authority to operate utilities for waterworks, sanitary sewers, and storm sewers. The storm sewer authority, established in 1983, set the precedent for a workable process of charging a use fee on a utility bill for a city service infrastructure that is of value to everyone in a city. Similar to the storm sewer authority, a transportation or sidewalk utility would use technical, well-founded measurements and would equitably distribute the costs of local infrastructure services. Response: The Legislature should authorize cities to create, as a local option, additional utilities such as a transportation or sidewalk utility, that ensure funding for the maintenance of these public amenities. Additionally, whether established as a new chapter of law or added to the list of service charges in Minn. Stat. § 429.101, cities should be able to impose service charges against property to ensure the maintenance and safety of the right of way for all Minnesotans without having to prove an increase in fair market value or having to determine whether those contributing to the utility fund are taxable or tax-exempt. Such authority would acknowledge the effects of repeated levy limits and the general funding shift from the state to local governments for building and maintaining necessary infrastructure; the benefits to all taxpayers of a properly maintained public infrastructure; and, the limitations of existing special assessment authority. SD -15. Administrgtive Fines for Code V➢clations Issue. Many statutory and home rule charter cities have implemented administrative enforcement programs for violations of local regulatory ordinances such as building codes, zoning codes, health codes, and public nuisance ordinances. This use of administrative proceedings has kept enforcement at the local level and reduced pressure on over -burdened district court systems. Cities using administrative enforcement processes experience a lower cost of enforcement and a quicker resolution to code violations. Minnesota statutes expressly provide the authority for all cities to utilize administrative enforcement of local codes and enforcement of liquor license and tobacco license violations. In 2009, the Legislature amended Minn. Stat. ch. 169, the chapter of law pertaining to state traffic regulations, to allow cities and counties to issue administrative citations for certain minor traffic offenses. Since the passage of the 2009 administrative traffic citations law, some people have questioned whether administrative citations for non -traffic, liquor, and tobacco license code violations can be legally issued by statutory cities given that state law does not expressly provide authority on other code matters. Response: The League of Minnesota Cities continues to support the use of city administrative fines for local regulatory ordinances, such as building codes, zoning codes, health codes, public nuisance ordinances, and regulatory matters that are not duplicative of misdemeanor or higher-level state traffic and criminal offenses. The (Legislature should clarify that both statutory and home rules charter cities have the authority to issue administrative citations for code violations. Further, state statute should allow statutory and home rule charter cities to adjudicate administrative citations and to assess a Hen on properties for unpaid administrative fines. SD -23. 027ganized Solid Waste ColleeVe n Issue: "Organized collection" refers to a situation where a local unit of government, for any of a variety of reasons, decides that there is a public interest served by limiting the number of solid waste and recycling collection services available in the area. The reasons for implementing organized collection can vary, but include: a) Public safety concerns caused by the number and frequency of large trucks moving quickly through residential neighborhoods; b) Reducing wear on public infrastructure from heavy truck traffic; c) Improving the efficiency, cost and quality of garbage and recycling service provided to local residents; d) Cooperating with other local governments to best meet solid waste management and recycling objectives; e) Taking local steps to reduce energy impacts of public services; and f) Meeting the requirements of county ordinances and solid waste management plans as required under Minn. Stat. § 115.94. Organized collection is also encouraged in state solid waste policies as a means of improving the efficiency and coordination of solid waste management between local units of government. There are very specific and burdensome public procedures laid out in statute defining how such a decision must be publicly vetted and approved and over what time period that can occur. Despite all of these important and valid reasons for using organized collection, legislation has been discussed in several recent sessions that would allow special takings claims or contractual damages to be claimed by the solid waste industry if local governments make decisions that limit the number of companies that can collect garbage in a community in a manner that prevents a company currently operating in the community from continuing to do so through the implementation of organized collection. The unspecified and ongoing liability this change would create would have the effect of eliminating organized collection as a waste management option. This change would also create a virtual monopoly situation for any company awarded a solid waste contract under organized collection. The local unit of government would have to "buy out" a contractor in the future to change providers, even if their services were no longer the lowest bid. It also creates an incentive for bidders under organized collection to submit high bids, as they would be eligible for damages if they fail to win without having to provide service. Furthermore, this is a precedent that, if applied to other government purchasing and service contracting decisions, would clearly run counter to the public purpose of government providing services at the lowest feasible cost to taxpayers. Response: The League of Minnesota Cities opposes efforts to apply inverse condemnation claims to city solid waste contracting decisions or to allow automatic contractual damage claims for solid waste haulers that lose competitive bids in organized collection communities. Further, the League supports the current state policy that organized collection is a valuable tool as part of a comprehensive solid waste and recycling management program and recognizes the need to protect and preserve the authority of cities to adopt solid waste service contracts that protect public safety, the environment and public infrastructure. SD -65. Impaired Waters Issue: Despite the billions of dollars that Minnesota municipalities have invested and continue to invest in wastewater and stormwater management systems, and best management practices to protect, preserve, and restore the quality of Minnesota's surface waters, the quality of some of Minnesota's surface waters does not meet federal water quality requirements. The federal Clean Water Act requires that further efforts be made by the state to reduce human impacts on surface waters that are determined to be impaired due to high pollutant loads of nutrients, bacteria, sediment, mercury, and other contaminants. Scientific studies of these waters must be conducted to determine how much pollution they can handle (Total Maximum Daily Loads, or TMDLs). The pollutant load reduction requirements will affect municipal, industrial, and agricultural practices and operations along any river, stream or lake determined to be impaired. While the sources of 86 percent of the pollutants affecting Minnesota waters are non -point sources, there will also be new costs and requirements for point -source dischargers, like municipal wastewater treatment facilities. Municipal stormwater systems will also face increased protective requirements and regulation as part of the state's impaired waters program. Response: The League of Minnesota Cities will work actively with the administration, the Legislature, and other stakeholders in the design and implementation of Minnesota's impaired waters program to: a) Ensure equitable funding solutions are found, such as the state general fund or bonding, that broadly collect revenue to address this statewide problem; b) Support legislative appropriation of constitutionally dedicated clean water revenues that will supplement traditional sources of funding for these purposes, not be used to cover budget cuts, backfill past program reductions, or to otherwise supplant normal state spending on water programs; c) Direct the majority of funds collected by the state for impaired waters into programs that fund municipal wastewater and stormwater projects, and for state programs needed for municipal wastewater and stormwater permitting and technical support, including the Clean Water Revolving Loan Fund, Wastewater Infrastructure Fund, TMDL Grants Program, Small Community Wastewater Treatment Grant and Loan Program, and other state programs that provide financial resources for city wastewater treatment facilities, septic tank replacement, stormwater management projects, and other city water quality improvement and protection projects; d) More adequately cover the current five-year wastewater infrastructure funding need projection of more than $1.65 billion; e) Recognize and address the upcoming costs of stormwater management infrastructure and operation on municipalities from new regulatory mandates and load reduction requirements; f) Allow flexibility in achieving pollutant load reductions and limitations through offsets or trading of pollutant load reduction credits for both point and non -point load reduction requirements within watersheds; g) Recognize and credit the work underway and already completed by local units of government to limit point and non -point source water pollutant discharges; h) Recognize the diversity of efforts and needs that exists across the state; i) Ensure the best science available is used to accurately determine the sources of pollutant load in order to maximize positive environmental outcomes and minimize unnecessary regulatory and financial burdens for cities by correctly accounting for and addressing agricultural and other non -point pollutant sources; j) Ensure the state requires that the MPCA retain control of the TMDL development process and that all scientific research related to TMDLs is conducted by the MPCA or qualified, objective parties pursuant to state contracting, procurement, and conflict of interest laws; and k) Clarify state water quality mandates so cities know specifically what they are required to do and what methods of achieving those outcomes are acceptable to state and federal regulators. LE -9. Resources for Affordable HousIl ng Issue: Cities, along with local housing officials, are concerned about the need for proactive commitment at the state level to aid cities to meet demand for affordable housing that is sensitive to local conditions, emerging trends, and changing demographics. This includes meeting the needs of an aging population and ensuring a wide range of lifecycle housing options that allow seniors of all incomes to stay in their community, addressing racial disparity gaps in housing, and responding to emerging trends, such as the need to preserve naturally occurring (unsubsidized) affordable housing. The League also recognizes that federal, state and local governments all have a role to play in meeting affordable housing needs, overcoming barriers to housing stability such as high market prices, eviction, and foreclosure, and responding to problems caused by vacant homes and the increase in rental properties that are the result of foreclosure. In 2017, the Minnesota Legislature passed legislation to provide local governments with the ability to establish a local affordable housing trust fund as a tool to help meet affordable housing needs. Since the Fair Housing Act of 1968, local government has been obligated to promote and reduce barriers to fair housing and equal opportunity. The Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Rule (AFFH), released in 2015 by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), is helping the region develop better strategies to address barriers to opportunity and promote fair housing choice. Households with Section 8 housing choice vouchers face many barriers to securing housing in the private rental market, especially when rental vacancy rates are low. Currently rental vacancy rates are at a historic low in much of the state. As a result, many families and individuals may be unable to use their Section 8 housing choice vouchers and thus unable to secure safe, decent and affordable housing. Response: The Legislature should: a) Support the affordable housing priorities of the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency (MHFA), which include making resources and methods available to maintain and improve existing affordable homes, especially housing stock that is aging such as naturally occurring (unsubsidized) affordable housing. b) Provide stable and long term funding for Minnesota Housing and other affordable housing programs, including those that allow flexibility for cities to create partnerships and leverage resources with private and public entities, such as: capital investment funding for affordable and public housing, funding for supportive services and programs that address homelessness and reduce barriers to stable housing and homeownership, a state low-income housing tax credit to help rebuild the state's partnership with local governments in the development of homeownership, and multi -family rental assistance and housing renovation programs. c) Consider establishing a program to address immediate needs throughout the year to provide a match for new or existing city -supported affordable housing projects. This could include matching funds, issued on a timeline that is consistent with local budgeting processes, for local revenues allocated to a local affordable housing trust fund. d) Substantially increase long-term funding for the Economic Development & Challenge Fund to leverage local private and public resources to develop workforce rental and single-family homes. e) Support legislation to provide sales, use, and transaction tax exemptions or reductions for development and production of affordable housing and use state bond proceeds for land banking and trusts as well as rehabilitation and construction of affordable housing. f) Provide funding and financing tools to cities to create affordable senior housing for our aging population. g) Provide funding and financing tools to cities to create affordable housing and prevent foreclosure for veterans. h) Support for policy, programs and funding to reduce the racial gap in homeownership rates, such as targeted homeownership capacity building and homebuyer assistance. i) Support resources to assist communities to reduce barriers to and promote fair housing and equal opportunity. j) Support housing stability for renters through policies that mitigate the impact of or reduce evictions filed and provide additional funding for the Section 8 housing choice voucher or other rental assistance programs and financial, tax, and/or other incentives for rental property owners to participate in these programs. LE -22. Workforce Readiness Issue: It is critical for the future of our economy to prepare for new demographic trends. While population rates among communities of color are projected to increase, the unemployment rate for communities of color exceed the unemployment rate for white Minnesotans. For example, data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) indicate that black unemployment rates are consistently two to three times higher than the unemployment rates of white Minnesotans and studies indicate that hiring bias is a substantial factor for this disparity in unemployment rates. In addition, while early work experience is a leading predictor of future success in a workplace, recent statistics from BLS show that the youth unemployment rate for 16-19 year olds is three times that of the unemployment rate for the state as a whole. Incumbent worker training and education must be an important component of Minnesota's efforts to improve workforce readiness. By making firms and employees more competitive, incumbent worker training can increase wages, increase employment opportunities, fill skilled worker gaps, and keep jobs and employers in their communities. The Minnesota Job Skills Partnership is one proven tool that provides training to thousands of incumbent workers each year. Response: The Legislature should: a) Fully fund the Minnesota Job Skills Partnership and other workforce training programs administered by the Department of Employment and Economic Development, the Department of Human Services, and the various education agencies; b) Provide additional flexible funding to local workforce councils, including governments and educational facilities, for the purpose of upgrading the skills and productivity of the workforce, and pursue additional creative programming and funding to prepare and place underemployed and unemployed Minnesotans, as well as address the issue of those phasing out of the workplace and retiring; c) Provide additional funding for programs specifically designed to address youth employment such as career and workforce readiness programs, and employment disparities; and d) Continue to support cities that provide workforce programs that are coordinated with and complement state and regional efforts by seeking municipal approval before making any changes to those service areas. LE-23.Business Development Issue: Programs such as the Minnesota Investment Fund (MIF), the Job Creation Fund (JCF), the Redevelopment Program, and contaminated site clean-up grants provide funding opportunities for communities and businesses to develop their local and regional economies. These well -utilized programs create infrastructure, revitalize property, and help businesses generate and expand jobs. Cities are key facilitators in the implementation of economic development strategies through land use and other policies. Response: The League of Minnesota Cities supports sustainable funding for the Minnesota Investment Fund and the Job Creation Fund to assist local communities and businesses in creating, growing, and retaining jobs. The League supports the continuation of the Minnesota Job Creation Fund by the Legislature. DEED should solicit input from cities about how best to implement the Fund, and make adjustments to the administration of the program as necessary. The League supports Department of Employment and Economic Development (DEED) studying and making recommendations on methods to improve the geographic balance of recipients, perhaps by altering the required number of jobs created or developing other programmatic changes that allow all regions of the state to better prosper. LE -24. Land Recycling and Redevelopment Issue: Communities across Minnesota are faced with expensive barriers to re -using property. These roadblocks include deteriorating, obsolete, and vacant structures, and contaminated land. Larger scale redevelopment projects often require the purchase and assembly of multiple, smaller parcels of land that are not suitable for development on their own. Cities and development authorities may need to purchase land over a period of years and hold them for later development, reducing the effectiveness of traditional financing tools that require immediate development. Such barriers pose significant problems for cities seeking to re -use existing infrastructure, maintain and improve property tax base, provide jobs and housing opportunities, and preserve historic structures. Land recycling activities are particularly costly because significant remediation must occur before private -sector interest can be generated. Exacerbating this situation, the land recycling programs administered by the Department of Employment and Economic Development (DEED) and the Metropolitan Council programs continue to be underfunded. Response: In recognition of the unique needs of land recycling projects statewide, the Legislature should increase funding for the statewide redevelopment account. The League of Minnesota Cities would also support the creation of a land assembly grant or loan program to assist cities and economic development authorities assemble small parcels for redevelopment. The League supports competitive programs administered by DEED with both bonding and general fund appropriations that distribute the funds equitably between greater Minnesota and the metro area. The Legislature should continue its support and increase funding levels for state and regional programs to assist in contamination cleanup and brownfields remediation efforts. The State should recognize that the rehabilitation of land due to obsolescence or incompatible land uses is a component of redevelopment. The Legislature should amend the definition of redevelopment district under the TIF Act to include the obsolescence and incompatible land uses included in a renewal and renovation district, thereby providing cities with more flexible tools to address land recycling and redevelopment. The Legislature should also revive a program similar to "This Old Shop", which would allow cities greater flexibility in targeting commercial development and redevelopment. The Legislature should consider enacting authority that would provide a tax deferral on improvements to commercial buildings, including those located in designated rehabilitation or historic preservation districts. The program's age limit qualifications should include properties that are at least 30 years old. LE -25. Development Authork y ]Levy Limfts Issue: Under Minn. Stat. § 469.107, § 469.033, and § 469.053, Economic Development Authorities (EDAs), Housing and Redevelopment Authorities (HRAs) and port authority levies for economic development activities are capped. These limits can hinder the planning of future development. Response: The Legislature should repeal levy limits or increase the levying authority for EDA, HRA, and port authority activities in Minn. Stat. ch. 469. LE -26. Tax Increment Mnancing (TIF) Issue: TIF is the most important tool available to fund community development and redevelopment efforts. Over time, the TIF law has become increasingly complex as the Legislature seeks to provide cities with the resources to grow the state's economy while maintaining limits on the use of property taxes. Cities need greater flexibility to use TIF for community and economic development that support a city's residents and businesses. Further restrictions of TIF would render the tool less effective and will hinder local efforts to support job creation, housing, redevelopment and remediation. One component of the redevelopment TIF law (Minn. Stat. 469.174, subd. 10) requires that more than 50 percent of the buildings in a proposed redevelopment district be deemed "structurally substandard to a degree requiring substantial renovation or clearance" before a district can be established. This makes small districts with two properties particularly difficult to establish. Response: The Legislature should not enact future TIS' law restrictions, rather the Legislature should: a) Amend Minn. Stat. § 469.1763, surd. 4, to clarify that tax increment pooling limitations are calculated on a cumulative basis. b) Modify Minn. Stat. 469.174, subd. 10, to allow a redevelopment district to be established where only 50 percent of the buildings are required to be structurally substandard to a degree requiring substantial renovation or clearance. c) Clarify that expenditures for the necessary maintenance of properties within TIF districts are an allowable use of tax increment under Minn. Stat. § 469.176, subd. 4; d) Allow term extensions for redevelopment districts which are taking longer to develop; e) Amend Minn. Stat. § 469.1763, subd. 3, to eliminate the "Five-year Rule" for districts that are taking longer to develop; f) Amend Minn. Stat. § 469.174, subd. 25, to provide time limits on the "deemed increment" created by land sales, leases and loans, and allow authorities greater flexibility in the use of lease revenues to fund ongoing operations; g) Expand the use of TIF to assist in the development of technological infrastructure and products, biotechnology, research, multi -modal transportation and transit - oriented development, restoration of designated historic structures, non -retail commercial projects, and non -wetland areas where unstable/non-bondable soils exist; h) Increase the ability of TIF to facilitate redevelopment and housing activities; i) Modify the housing district income qualification level requirements to allow the levels to vary according to individual communities; j) Encourage compact development and consider reauthorization of compact development TIF districts with modifications to increase their effectiveness; k) Discourage any statutory mechanisms that direetlly or indirectly decrease the impact of city redevelopment and economic development projects; 1) Simplify the substandard building test to resolve ambiguities and reduce the continued threats of litigation; m) Create an exception to the interfund loan resolution requirement in Minn. Stat. 469.178, subd. 7, to authorize the development authority to delegate to a staff person the ability to set the terms and conditions of an interfund loan. n) Amend the definition of redevelopment district under the TIF Act to include the obsolescence and incompatible land uses included in a renewal and renovation district, thereby providing cities with more flexible tools to address land recycling and redevelopment. LE -27. Property Tax Abatement AuthRority Issue: In an effort to increase the number of development tools available, the 1997 Legislature authorized local units of government to grant property tax abatements. Although tax increment financing (TIF) continues to be the primary financing mechanism for local development projects, tax abatements provide cities with an important, additional economic development tool. Recognizing the need for municipal development tools, the 2008 Legislature expanded the abatement authority by converting the limit on abatements from ten percent of the current tax levy to ten percent of net tax capacity. In order to provide maximum benefits and recognize local decision-making, tax abatements should have less restrictive funding caps, financing terms, and authorized uses. The tax abatement law requires that a political subdivision may only approve an abatement after holding a public meeting with a minimum of 10 days published public notice. When more than one political subdivision abates property taxes for a development project, there must be separate notices and hearings for each subdivision. This requirement can be particularly burdensome for programs designed to develop multiple properties over an extended period of time. If one political subdivision could be designated as the lead entity for purposes of the notice and hearing requirements, such projects could be made more efficient without sacrificing public transparency. Property tax abatements should not be considered a replacement for TIF. Response: In light of current economic conditions existing property tax abatement authority should be strengthened. The Legislature should: a) Expand the abatement authority to allow abatement revenues to be used for economic development activities such as workforce readiness and assistance programs, and technology infrastructure improvements; b) Develop a state fund to facilitate state participation in abatement projects; c) Increase funding caps anod duration limits; and d) Amend Minn. Stat. § 469.1813, subd. 5, to create a streamlined notice and hearing requirement for multi -jurisdictional tax abatement projects. LE -30. Workforce Housing Issue: Job creation is one of the fundamental goals of economic development. When employers create new jobs through expansion or relocation there must be sufficient housing in the host community for the new workers and their families to live. In rural communities, a lack of housing stock for new workers can prevent a planned expansion or relocation, hampering job growth and economic development. The economics of building a housing development in greater Minnesota communities makes private development difficult, and workers with higher paying jobs do not qualify for traditional affordable housing. This housing gap can bring development and job growth in a community to a halt. In 2014, at the urging of cities through Minnesota, the Legislature created a workforce housing pilot program for three cities in Roseau and Pennington Counties. In 2015 the Legislature passed League -sponsored legislation that created the workforce housing development program and appropriated $4 million to the Department of Employment and Economic Development (DEED) to administer the program. Once grant awards from DEED were made, prevailing wage requirements, construction costs, and land prices have shown to lessen the effectiveness of creating more workforce housing units. It is important to ensure the appropriate resources and process exist for the Department of Labor and Industry (DLI) to determine representative and accurate prevailing wage amounts in different areas across the state. The 2017 Legislature approved funding for the Workforce Housing Grant Program at $2 million each year. The program was moved from DEED to be administered by MN Housing Finance Agency (MHFA) in Minn. Stat. 469A.39 with a change in qualifications that gives preference to cities under 30,000 population (rather than 18,000 previously). The 2017 Legislature also approved a new use of TIF authority for workforce housing (Minn. Stat. § 469.174-176). In addition to requirements under Minn. State. 469.175, subd. 3, county and school boards must approve the TIF plan before it is enacted and the authority sunsets in 2027. These additional requirements specific to workforce housing TIF districts put additional barriers on workforce housing development and does not fully recognize the role of cities as the typical lead government entity on housing projects. Minn. Stat. § 469.175, subd. 2, currently requires cities to provide the county auditor and clerk of the school board with the proposed TIF plan and an estimate of the fiscal and economic implications of the proposed TIF district at least 30 days before the public hearing required by Minn. Stat. § 469.175, subd. 3. The county auditor and school board shall provide copies of these TIF plan materials to members of their boards. These current requirements provide sufficient notice to taxpayers and other government entities about proposed TIF districts. Response: The League of Minnesota Cities supports additional tools for local communities to develop workforce housing: a) MHFA should solicit input from local communities to ensure that the goals of the Workforce Housing Grant program are met, and MHFA should award funds to eligible projects as quickly and efficiently as possible; b) The Legislature should increase funding to the Housing and Job Growth Initiative to aid housing in support of job growth, and amend Minn. Stat. § 462A.33 to eliminate or increase the maximum income levels for participation in the program; and c) The Minnesota Housing Finance Agency should make administrative changes to the Housing Challenge Grant program to streamline the application process, reduce the per-unit cost of constructing affordable housing, and increase the construction of affordable rental units at 80% of median income and owner - occupied units at 115% of median income, as currently allowed by state and federal law; and d) The Legislature should pass legislation creating a workforce housing tax credit to spur development of workforce housing. e) The Legislature should scale the workforce housing grant program to account for the additional cost associated with the prevailing wage requirements. f) The Legislature should eliminate the provision in Minn. Stat. § 469.175, subd. 3, that requires the county board and school board to approve a workforce housing TIF plan before it is enacted and the Legislature should also eliminate the sunset of the workforce housing TIF authority. DP -1. Data Practices and Record Retention Compliance Costs Issue: The purpose of the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act (MGDPA) is to protect personal information from indiscriminate disclosure while balancing the right of the public to know what the government is doing. The Act also attempts to balance these rights within a context of effective government operation. The League of Minnesota Cities supports the public policy behind the MGDPA while acknowledging that compliance with the law imposes costs on local taxpayers. Smaller cities struggle with limited staff and resources while larger cities struggle with larger complex databases. The MGDPA must balance the right of citizens to access public data with the cost to municipalities of complying with certain types of data requests. In 2014, the Legislature imposed additional security requirements on political subdivisions in an attempt to prevent unauthorized individuals from accessing private data. Adequate security measures are important, but they make compliance with the MGDPA more difficult and costly. Although the Legislature has made compliance with the MGDPA a priority, funding for the Information and Policy Analysis Division of the Department of Administration (IPAD), the department charged with overseeing the MGDPA, does not reflect the increased need for local government assistance. Cities continue to receive repetitive, overly broad and far-reaching data requests that require significant staff time to locate government records, redact private data or data unrelated to the request, and assemble documents to be provided in order to comply with requirements to provide access to public government data. In some situations, as with overly broad data requests related to "applicant" lists, staff time and costs are significantly increased and not recoverable for very limited public benefit. The MGDPA also limits the ability of cities to be reimbursed for responding to requests. For example, cities are limited to charging only 25 -cents per page for copies of police motor vehicle incident reports, which does not cover the city cost for copying, while the Commissioner of Public Safety is exempt from this restriction—thereby permitting the Department of Public Safety to continue to charge $5 for incident reports that cities are required to submit to the department. Furthermore, the Official Records Act requires government entities to "make and preserve all records necessary to a full and accurate knowledge of their official activities." In accordance, cities must establish a records retention schedule, and maintain and destroy official records according to this schedule. There are rigorous requirements for any changes to a city's records retention schedule, including getting approval from the statutorily -created Records Disposition Panel, which strikes an appropriate balance between the government entity's decision-making role in determining retention and disposition of official records with the public's right to know the government entity's official activities. Response: As the cost of complying with the MGDPA increases, the League supports: a) Providing additional state funding to assist political subdivisions with meeting tale increasing complexity of managing government data. b) Providing state funding for statewide data practices training. c) Allowing political subdivisions to charge for the staff time that is required to comply with wide-ranging data requests regardless of whether copies of the data are requested. d) Providing a mechanism that would pennant cities to challenge whether a data request is reasonable and made in good faith. e) Amending the MGDPA to limit what is considered public applicant data to better balance the value of public data with the cost r6ated to data practices compliance. f) Allowing political subdivisions to charge the same amount for copies of motor vehicle incident reports issued by locall police and fire departments as the commissioner of public safety. The League of Minnesota Cities opposes: a) Further increasing the maximum exemplary damages that courts may impose against government entities, including cities, found to have violated the MGDPA; further increasing the maximum civil penalty that may be imposed when a court order is issued to compel a government entity to comply with MGDPA; or any statutory change that would make it a mandatory civil penalty to compel compliance under the MOIDPA. b) Repealing of the administrative remedies provisions adopted by the 2010 Legislature to address disputes regarding MGDPA compliance issues. c) Changing the current record management requirements and statutory definitions. ➢f changes are needed, subject mattes- experts should make recommendations through the records retention schedule process. 216B.XXXX CARBON REDUCTION FACILITIES - NUCLEAR ENERGY. Subdivision l.Qualifying Facilities. A Carbon Reduction Facility is an existing large electric generating power plant employing nuclear technology to generate electricity. Subd. 2. Proposal submission. (a) A public utility may submit a proposal for designation as a Carbon Reduction Facility under this section to the Public Utilities Commission. The proposal shall include: (1) A showing that the facility meets the requirements of Subd. 1. (2) A proposed statement of the total expected costs, including but not limited to capital investments and operation and maintenance costs, associated with operation of the facility. (b) A utility may, at its sole discretion, file additional proposals for the same facility at any time in the event of changes to information shown in the original proposal. Subd. 3. Proposal Approval. (a) The commission shall approve, or reject the proposed designation of the facility. The commission shall make a final determination on the petition within ten months of its filing date. (b) With respect to any Carbon Reduction Facility, the approval shall constitute a finding of prudency for the total costs contained in the proposal, meaning that the utility shall be entitled to recover, through use of the Carbon Reduction Rider outlined in Subd. 4, any documented costs not in excess of the costs provided in in its proposal for designation as a Carbon Reduction Facility. (c) For the Prairie Island nuclear facility, in no case shall recovery exceed the costs provided in the Utility's May 16, 2008 Certificate of Need filing for this facility. (d) If additional proposals are filed for the same facility, those proposals shall be treated by the commission the same as an original proposal under this section. Subd. 4 Carbon Reduction Rider. (a) A public utility may annually petition the commission, outside of a general rate case proceeding under section 21613. 16, for approval of a Carbon Reduction Rider to recover the total costs of a qualifying facility. In its filing, the public utility shall provide a description of the costs for which the public utility seeks rider recovery; Subd. 5. Rider Approval. (a) The commission may approve, modify and approve, or reject the proposed Carbon Reduction Rider. (b) The commission may approve a rider that: (1) allows the utility to recover the total costs of the facility; (2) allows an appropriate return on investment associated with the facility; (3) allocates appropriately between wholesale and retail customers; and (4) recovers costs from retail customer classes in proportion to class energy consumption. The Inland Rail Economic Development and Job Stabilization and Growth Act of 2018 Introduction Other than a sparsely used loan program, Minnesota has no financial resources or programs to address "inland" (not on waterways), while since about 2000, its spent over 30 million dollars for economic development and improvements at public ports on waterways. Similarly, the State has no effective program to address necessary and needed upgrades of its Class II and III Railroads, while neighboring Wisconsin has spent over 240 million over the past 20 years and Iowa, over 60 million, for those causes. Simply put, this makes our State less competitive in the Midwest marketplace for its agricultural and industrial/commercial products and manufacturing, creating longterm negative impact consequences on existing jobs, and, stifle the creation of new jobs. This legislation is intended to address known needs (applications) from around the state and include estimates of needed capital improvements from six (6) of the larger new shortlines in the State and four different counties (three who have proposed new industrial parks but found no way to finance them). Each of these needs rail to develop and succeed. + Five year capital needs total about 66 million dollars for these known projects. The proposed legislation addresses how to possibly fund this as well as ways to make the formal application process "user friendly" and expeditious.. (For example, if State bonding funds are used, a streamlined process needs to be established for rail projects to avoid a multi month (and in one case, a four year process to free up bonding funds to begin a project). This is not intended to be critical of MMB, as most of their experiences have in the past handled the financing of publicly owned properties, buildings and improvements, and rail construction and techniques are "foreign" to them.. But, new industrial development and in some cases, rail projects have "emergent " and sometimes, safety implications and need to be handled quickly —generally within 30 days. The proposed "Draft" legislation to accomplish this is on the next page, followed by a examples of projects done for capital improvements through grants at public ports along the Minnesota waterway system, and, also one example of a joint DEED — MNDOT, 18 million dollar for state highways/roads. Following this is the identification of known projects which have been pending and need funding, where no other funding is known to be available. +As a comparison, a 2014 MNDOT report (attached) shows that in the period year 2000 thru 2014, the state had sold $2.092 billion in bond to fund trunk highway state roads. Trucks who use these highways in many cases compete with railroads, but, the point is to simply contrast the relative small amount of the funding requested here versus what the State funds highways. City Council Agenda 03/26/2018 2F. Consideration of waiving monetary limits on municipal tort liabilitv established by Minnesota Statutes (WO) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The purpose of this item is to have the Council decide whether to waive or not waive monetary limits on tort liability as part of its insurance coverage. The city's property and liability insurance coverages are renewable in July of each year. As part of the renewal process, the Council must formally indicate whether they want to waive monetary limits established by state law. Currently, statutory tort limits cap the city's liability to $500,000 on any claim per individual and $1,500,000 from all claimants for one incident. If the city chose to waive the tort limits, per individual claims and per occurrence claims would be limited to $2,000,000. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to deny waiving the monetary limits on municipal tort liability established by Minnesota Statutes. 2. Motion to approve waiving the monetary limits on municipal liability established by Minnesota Statutes. 3. Motion to C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends Alternative #1. Under this option, the City Council would utilize the tort limits established by state statute and not waive the monetary limits. This ensures a limit on the amount of damages that an individual could seek in a lawsuit involving the city. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • Copy of liability insurance application form o� LEAGUE of CONNECTING & INNOVATING MINNESOTA SINCE 1913 CITIES LIABILITY COVERAGE — WAIVER FORM LMCIT members purchasing coverage must complete and return this form to LMCIT before the effective date of the coverage. Please return the completed form to your underwriter or email to pstech@lmc.org This decision must be made by the member's governing body every year. You may also wish to discuss these issues with your attorney. League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust (LMCIT) members that obtain liability coverage from LMCIT must decide whether to waive the statutory tort liability limits to the extent of the coverage purchased. The decision has the following effects: If the member does not waive the statutory tort limits, an individual claimant would be able to recover no more than $500,000 on any claim to which the statutory tort limits apply. The total all claimants would be able to recover for a single occurrence to which the statutory tort limits apply would be limited to $1,500,000. These statutory tort limits apply regardless of whether the city purchases the optional excess liability coverage. If the member waives the statutory tort limits and does not purchase excess liability coverage, a single claimant could potentially recover up to $2,000,000 for a single occurrence. (Under this option, the tort cap liability limits are waived to the extent of the member's liability coverage limits, and the LMCIT per occurrence limit is $2 million.) The total all claimants would be able to recover for a single occurrence to which the statutory tort limits apply would also be limited to $2,000,000, regardless of the number of claimants. If the member waives the statutory tort limits and purchases excess liability coverage, a single claimant could potentially recover an amount up to the limit of the coverage purchased. The total all claimants would be able to recover for a single occurrence to which the statutory tort limits apply would also be limited to the amount of coverage purchased, regardless of the number of claimants. Claims to which the statutory municipal tort limits do not apply are not affected by this decision. 61,1 rb ilenrlIGIIo, MN LMCIT Member Name Check one: 91 The member DOES NOT WAIVE the monetary limits on municipal tort liability established by Minnesota Statutes, Section 466.04. ❑ The member WAIVES the monetary limits on municipal tort liability established by Minnesota Statutes, Section 466.04 to the extent of the limits of they liability coverage obtained from LMCIT. Date of city co;' er ' body meeting /rI4RGu �. �t8 Signature - Position FNAB t7�REGTOfL 145 UNIVERSITY AVE. WEST PHONE: (651) 281-1200 FAx: (651) 281-1299 ST. PAUL, MN 55103-2044 TOLL FREE: (800) 925-1122 wEB:www.Lmc.oPc City Council Agenda: 3/26/2018 2G. Consideration of approving amended uolicv for utilitv billing winter averaging for residential sewer consumption (WO) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The city formally established the winter averaging policy in February 2013. Customers received winter averaging prior to 2013 without a formally adopted policy. The 2013 policy was amended in October 2016 to accommodate monthly billing, which began for January 2017 usage. Staff now has a monthly history of customer usage for a complete year (additional data) and recommends another policy amendment. The proposed policy more accurately bills sewage usage. Winter averaging means lower water usage months will be used as basis to calculate sewage charges in higher water usage months. The current policy uses winter averaging months January through March for calculating sewage charges for months April through September. The amended policy would use winter averaging months November through March to calculate sewage charges for months April through October. Additionally, the policy also clarifies that nonresidential sewage is based on water consumption unless the water is separately metered. Further, the policy provides a basis for calculating winter averaging for special circumstances (snowbirds, new customers, etc.). Finally, the policy allows for those still watering lawns in October. Al. Budget Impact: This action will not have a significant budget impact. The loss in October revenue may be offset with the addition of November and December to the winter averaging calculation base. Monthly readings for November and December were not used in the base for the prior year because that data didn't exist. Revenue increases or decreases will affect the magnitude of future sewage rate adjustments. A2. Staff Impact: Minimal. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the amended policy for utility billing winter averaging for residential sewer consumption. 2. Motion to approve the amended policy for utility billing winter averaging for residential sewer consumption with the following modifications: 3. Motion to deny the amended policy for utility billing winter averaging for residential sewer consumption. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends approving Alternative #1. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • City of Monticello Winter Averaging for Residential Sewer Consumption Policy Adopted 2018-3-26 (Proposed) Policy - Winter Averaging for Residential Sewer Consumption The purpose of this policy is to formally establish guidelines related to determining winter sewer consumption values for calculation of utility bills. Under this policy, "residential" means single- family and two-family dwellings. All other customers will be charged sewage based on water consumption with the exception of separately metered water used for irrigation purposes. Explanation of Winter Averaging Recognizing that some water use (e.g. washing cars or watering grass) does not go into the sanitary sewer system, the city has adopted this winter averaging policy. Sewage volume billing is based upon water usage. Accordingly, the city typically bills sewage according to the amount of water used in the winter months (November through March), when almost all water usage goes directly into the sanitary sewer system. Calculation of Winter Averaging For the purpose of calculating residential account sewage bills for water usage months April through October (typical lawn sprinkling months), the city will use the average of the water consumption for November, December, January, February, and March. Including other related charges, this value will be applied to the sewage rate to determine the sewage amount due. Exceptions: • Winter averaging for new customers with less than two months of non -zero readings from November — March will be calculated using a standard usage of 70 gallons per day assuming 2 occupants based on a month of 30 days. • A zero -usage reading for any months from November — March will not be factored into the calculation. For example, if the November — March readings are 4,500; 3,200; 0; 0; and 3,700, the total of 11,400 would be divided by 3 months rather than 5 months for a winter average of 3,800. • The policy shall not apply if actual water consumption drops below the winter average. • The policy shall not apply to residential dwellings with 3 or more units or to nonresidential properties. (These accounts are encouraged to obtain an irrigation meter to measure water usage, such as watering lawns, which does not go into the sanitary sewer system. Irrigation meters are billed for water usage only.) ADOPTED BY the Monticello City Council this 20h day of March, 2018. ATTEST: Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator CITY OF MONTICELLO Brian Stumpf, Mayor City Council Agenda: 3/26/18 2H. Consideration of adopting Resolution #2018-20 in support of Bondhus Corporation's Job Creation Fund (JCF) Application to MN -DEED in the amount of $195,000 (JT) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Bondhus Corporation is applying for a $195,000 grant from Minnesota DEED's Job Creation Fund (JCF) to help finance a two-story, 10,200 sq. ft. expansion to its existing 60,000 sq. ft. manufacturing facility located at 1400 East Broadway. The JCF application submittal requires City support through a Council resolution as well as staff sign off of the grant application. A nearly 53 year old company with origins in Monticello, Bondhus is a manufacturer of hex hand tools and screwdrivers. It makes 14,000 SKUs of hex and screwdriver oriented tools per day. The 85 workers at its Monticello production facility make and ship about 170,000 tools per day. Customers include Fastenal, Northern Tool, Mid -States Supply, etc. Bondhus has seen steady growth over the decades because of its high quality products with greater torq strength. It sells products internationally to 44 countries worldwide. Bondhus is just one of two hex hand tool makers left in the U.S., with Eklind of Chicago, being the other manufacturer. The need for the expansion area is to accommodate the launch of a new line of tools. Bondhus has examined purchasing other firms in locations outside of Monticello to pursue this line of work and has come to the conclusion that it makes the most sense to establish this work in Monticello and grow it here. The total cost of the proposed expansion project is expected to be $2,304,000. Bondhus is indicating that it will need the State JCF funding along with a request from the City of Monticello EDA Small Cities Development Program (SCDP) Loan fund in order to fill a funding gap to allow the total project investment to cash flow. The JCF dollars will be used to reimburse Bondhus for real property improvements at a rate of 5 percent of expenditures for new and renovated facilities. Additional JCF dollars will be paid to Bondhus over three (3) to five (5) years as it verifies annually that it has hired and retained approximately 15 to 16 new jobs as part of the expansion project. The JCF is a "pay for performance" program that was approved by the legislature in 2011 to broaden Minnesota's economic development toolkit. Bondhus indicates that it has already spent approximately $75,000 on feasibility planning design and engineering studies to accommodate the proposed expansion. Those expenditures are not included in the total costs noted above. Bondhus is also proposing to borrow $200,000 from the EDA SCDP Loan Program for equipment purchases. If approved by the EDA (scheduled review of the application is April 11, 2018), the loan will be secured with a purchase money security lien (UCC filing) against the equipment as per the adopted SCDP Loan Program Guidelines. The SCDP Fund has sufficient dollars to easily consider this loan request. Land use applications are likely necessary to support the expansion project and are a separate consideration of the City. Al. STAFF IMPACT: Community Development Department staff has spent considerable time working with Bondhus over the past several months (estimate of 12 to 14 hours +/-) reviewing concepts and exchanging ideas regarding funding programs and a best fit structure City Council Agenda: 3/26/18 for the expansion. The JCF application is submitted by the Company directly to the State with some collaboration and oversight by City staff. The JCF grant agreement (if approved) will be between Bondhus and the State, so there is minimal follow up City staff involvement in tracking expenditures, verifying job creation and wages and requesting reimbursement payments from the State. There is very minimal staff impact in considering the Resolution supporting Bondhus JCF application. A2. BUDGET IMPACT: There is a no budgetary impact related to consideration of the Resolution of support for Bondhus Corporations JCF application. Funding for the JCF program is provided by the State of Minnesota. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve Resolution 2018-20 in support of Bondhus Corporation's JCF application to MN -DEED in the amount of $195,000. 2. Motion to deny approval of the Resolution 2018-20 in support of Bondhus Corporation's JCF application to MN -DEED. 3. Motion of other. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council approve Resolution 2018-20 supporting Bondhus Corporation's JCF application to MN -DEED. The JCF application also requires a sign off by City staff prior to submittal to MN -DEED. Following that, City staff have little involvement in administering the grant since the agreement is between Bondhus Corporation and MN - DEED. Community benefits from the expansion include increased economic activity, additional spin- off business for area manufacturers and suppliers, 15 new FTE (full-time equivalent) jobs and additional property tax base. The City is not required to hold a public hearing to approve the resolution of support for Bondhus Corporation's JCF application. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Resolution 2018-20 B. JCF Grant Application Packet C. JCF Grant Application Narrative D. Summary Profile - Bondhus Corporation CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2018-20 RESOLUTION REGARDING THE SUPPORT OF A JOB CREATION FUND APPLICATION IN CONNECTION WITH BONDHUS CORPORATION'S EXPANSION PROJECT WHEREAS, the City of Monticello, Minnesota (the "City"), desires to assist Bondhus Corporation, a manufacturer of hand-held Hex tools, which is proposing to construct a two-story, 10,200 square foot addition to its existing manufacturing facility in the City; and, WHEREAS, the City of Monticello's Strategic plan calls for supporting a vibrant economy and encourages new job creation and investment in property within the community which benefits the local economy and increases the tax base and therefore supports Bondhus Corporation's plans to create 15 new jobs with average wages of $21.00 per hour and investment of approximately $2,304,000 to complete the proposed expansion project, and, WHEREAS, the City of Monticello understands that Bondhus Corporation, through and with the support of the City, intends to submit to the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development (MN -DEED) an application for an award and/or rebate from the Job Creation Fund (JCF) Program in the amount of $195,000, and, WHEREAS, the City of Monticello held a City Council meeting on March 26, 2018, to consider this matter. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Monticello City Council hereby expresses their approval of the expansion project proposed by Bondhus Corporation and its application for an award and/or rebate from the Job Creation Fund Program in the amount of $195,000. ADOPTED BY the Monticello City Council this 26th day of March, 2018. CITY OF MONTICELLO Brian Stumpf, Mayor ATTEST: Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator M � EMPLOYMENT AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Job Creation Fund (JCF) Program Application APPLICATION PROCEDURES The Job Creation Fund (JCF) Program provides job creation awards and capital investment rebates to designated businesses that retain or create high -paying, full-time permanent jobs and invest in real property improvements. The program is available statewide for manufacturing, distribution, warehousing, and other eligible business activities. Applications are accepted on a year-round basis as funds are available. To become a designated JCF business and receive benefits, a business must work in conjunction with the local government where the JCF business will be located. A JCF application must be completed and submitted to the Department of Employment and Economic Development (DEED) by the local government. Step-by-step instructions are listed below and applications may be submitted by mail or email to: Tom Washa Program Administrator - Principal 332 Minnesota Street, Suite E200 St. Paul, MN 55101 jobcreationfund@state.mn.us Completing the Job Creation Fund (JCF) Program Application: Step -by -Step Instructions In consultation with DEED, the local government will make a preliminary determination about whether a business meets the minimum program requirements. Use the Job Creation Fund Eligibility and Application Checklist on the program website for guidance. If a business is potentially eligible, the following steps are completed: 1. The business provides the information to the local government needed to complete JCF Application. A local government resolution in support of the project must be included. Local officials must submit the application to DEED. 2. DEED evaluates the application and notifies the local government and business of approval or denial. If approved, DEED will formally designate the business as a JCF business and determine a job creation award and/or capital investment rebate amount. Awards and/or rebates of $500,000 or more require DEED to hold a public hearing. 3. Jobs created and/or capital investment expenditures maybe counted after the business is formally notified by DEED that it has been designated as a JCF business. 4. DEED will draft a business subsidy agreement specifying the award and/or rebate to be provided after required job creation and capital investment goals are met. The JCF business and the DEED commissioner sign the business subsidy agreement. S. The local government will assist the business with submitting required annual progress reports, payment request documentation, and other information requested by DEED. The local government will also provide information on annual changes in wage requirements. 070117 JOB CREATION FUND PROGRAM APPLICATION SECTION 1- LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND BUSINESS APPLICANT INFORMATION Local Government Project Sponsor: City of Monticello Email: jim.thare@ci.monticello.mn.us Address: 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1 Business Legal Name: Bondhus Corporation Mailing Address: 1400 East Broadway Street Address for Project Applying for JCF (JCF Project) 1400 East Braodway Primary Business Contact and Title: Mike Blackston (President) Website: www.bondhus.com SWIFT Vendor Number*: 9392695 NAICS Code: 332216 Local Government Contact Name and Title: Jim Thares, Economic Development Manager Telephone: (763) 271-3254 City/State/Zip: Monticello, MN 55362 Parent Company Name (if applicable): City/State/Zip: Monticello, MN 55362 City/State/Zip for JCF Project: Monticello, MN 55362 E-mail: mblackston@bondhus.com Telephone: (763) 295-2162 FEIN: 41-0943206 Primary Business Activity for Proposed Project: Manufacturing Is 51% of the business cumulatively owned by minorities, veterans, women, or persons with a disability? YesElNo If you answered "Yes" please complete the Targeted Population Designation Characteristic Form attached to this application. *If you are intending on submitting an application, you may need to register as a vendor by going to: https://mn.gov/mmb/accounting/swift/vendor-resources/ For new vendors, please note that approval of your registration may take 3 — 4 business days. If you need assistance obtaining a vendor ID or completing the registration process, please call 651-201-8100, Option 1 SECTION 2 - PROJECT OVERVIEW 'ect Type: New business with no parent company or current operations X Expansion of existing facility or Minnesota company Expansion to Minnesota by a comganv with existing operations outside Minnesota 'project will involve: X Leasing an existing facility where leasehold improvements will be made Leasing a facility to be constructed Ownership of an existing facility and making improvements Construction and ownership of a new facility ther ility o_ d limitations that do not allow the business to expand at an existing Minnesota facility? Yes X No Not applicable -Cmild thi ject be located outside of Minnesota and serve the same customers? Yes LJ No Project Timeframe: Task: Commitment of all funds Start of construction Purchase equipment Complete construction Begin operations 070117 Estimated Completion Date: (mm/yyyy) 04/2018 07/2018 12/2018 11/2018 05/2019 Current number of permanent, full-time employees company -wide: 102 Current number of permanent, full-time employees in Minnesota: 85 Current number of permanent, full-time employees at proposed JCF site: 85 Will any jobs be relocated from another Minnesota site to the proposed JCF site? EJYes CoNo If yes, which location(s) will the employees be relocated from? *for jobs relocated from another Minnesota location, a letter in support of the move from the city where the job will be moving from must be attached **upon designation, an updated employee count will be requested Average wage for retained and/or new permanent, full-time employees: $22.68 Projected number of new full-time permanent jobs at proposed JCF project site: To be created in Year 1 To be created in Year 2 To be created in Year 3 # new FT, permanent jobs: 6 5 4 *full-time permanent jobs means positions with expected work hours of 2080 annually Sources & Uses: *since JCF funds are pay -for -performance, they should not be included as a source or use of funds Bank(s) Equity State Local Gov't Other Total Property Acquisition $o Site Improvement $0 New Construction $1,485,000 $75,000 $1,560,000 Renovation of an Existing Building $110,000 $110,000 Purchase of Machinery & Equipment $298,OOC $200,000 $498,000 Infrastructure $136,000 $136,000 Other: $0 Other: $0 Total Project Cost $2,029,000 $75,000 $0 $200,000 $0 $2,304,000 Has the business received state or local financial assistance in the last year? Yes No Does the property or the business have any outstanding local, state or federal tax liabilities?Yes No If yes, describe: Have state environmental review requirements been met for the project, if applicable? X' Yes No Are there current or unsatisfied judgments or injunctions against the business or owners? Yes X No If Yes, describe: Is there current or pending litigation involving the business? OYes No If yes, attach summary and disposition. Within the past five years, has there been any violation(s), citation(s), or complaint(s) of discrimination filed against the company in a state or federal court or before any state, federal or local government agency? r- LiI Yes No If Yes, attach a copy of the violation(s), citation(s), or complaint(s) and the disposition of each. 3 070117 SECTION 3 - REQUIRED INFORMATION *Information from the items listed below will be used to evaluate potential awards and rebates for a business requesting JCF designation. Please be thorough in addressing the requested information and clearly identify responses to each item separately by number. PART A— Business Description. Describe the business and its major activities. Please include the following information: 1. Business overview and company history and ownership - include organizational structure, parent comapany and any affiliates 2. Product or industry outlook for the JCF project 3. Total projected sales for the JCF project both inside and outside of Minnesota 4. Estimated sales to Minnesota customers that replace purchases from outside Minnesota 5. Markets (local, statewide, national, international) along with their respective percentage to total sales and the customers served 6. Philanthropic or other ways in which the business contributes or will contribute to Minnesota 7. Attach two years of historical financials (Profit & Loss/Balance Sheets/Income Statement/Cash Flow Statement) and financial projections PART B — Project Description. Describe the project for which JCF funds are being requested. Please include the following information: 8. Provide details for the project for which JCF funds are being requested. Discuss topics such as square footage increase, lease vs ownership, new construction vs renovation or leasehold improvements, etc. 9. If this is a lease scenario, explain how the JCF applicant will pay for tenant improvents, including amount, timing, and upfront expenses vs. lease payments. For more information see Job Creation Fund Benefits Explained. 10. Describe how the JCF project will strengthen and/or diversify the local or Minnesota economy 11. Describe any local government assistance for the JCF project (e.g., city loan, abatement, TIF, etc,) and comment on dollar amounts and/or general information on any city projects related to this project. 12. Attach line -item construction cost estimates for real property improvements for the JCF project 13. If available, attach a commitment letter from each financing source (ie Financial Institutions), including a letter of commitment for any business equity PART C — Business Competitors. Identify the competitors of the business within local community (city and county), the adjacent counties, and in the state of Minnesota. Include: 14. The name of each major competitor and the location of each competitor by city 15. How the products or services are different than the JCF business' 16. How the markets are different from the JCF business' PART D — Detailed job & wage information. 17. If applicable, provide quarterly payroll reports from the last year for current permanent full-time employees who will be located at the JCF project site 18. For new full-time permanent employees, complete the form on Page 5 of this application or attach a listing of jobs that includes the information from the form on Page 5. 070117 JOB CREATION FORM - PERMANENT JOBS TO BE CREATED HOURLY CASH TOTAL HOURLY POSITION TITLE *For the purposes of the Job Creation Fund program, job creation awards are provided for permanent full-time positions working 2080 hours per year. ** includes non -mandated benefits to the employee. Social security tax, unemployment insurance, workers compensation insurance and other benefits mandated by law must be excluded. NOTE: Minnesota job creation fund businesses must pay each new full-time employee added pursuant to the agreement total compensation, including benefits not mandated by law, that on an annualized basis is equal to at least 110 percent of the federal poverty level for a family of four. 5 070117 NUMBER WAGE RATE HOURLY VALUE CASH WAGE (list permanent full time positions only)* POSITIONS WITHOUT OF BENEFITS ** INCLUDING BENEFITS BENEFITS Shipper 1 $13.00 $3.50 $16.50 Packager 2 $14.00 $3.54 $17.54 Production - 1 4 $16.00 $3.62 $19.62 Production - 2 & 3 7 $23.77 $3.77 $27.54 Outside Sales 1 I $38.46 $5.42 $43.88 $0.00 I $0.00 I I $0.00 I $0.00 $0.00 I $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 I $0.00 $0.00 Total jobs to be Created: 15 Average hourly Cash Wage: $21 Average hourly benefits: $4 *For the purposes of the Job Creation Fund program, job creation awards are provided for permanent full-time positions working 2080 hours per year. ** includes non -mandated benefits to the employee. Social security tax, unemployment insurance, workers compensation insurance and other benefits mandated by law must be excluded. NOTE: Minnesota job creation fund businesses must pay each new full-time employee added pursuant to the agreement total compensation, including benefits not mandated by law, that on an annualized basis is equal to at least 110 percent of the federal poverty level for a family of four. 5 070117 SECTION 4 - BUSINESS ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND CERTIFICATION DATA PRIVACY ACKNOWLEDGMENT: Tennessen Warning Notice: per MN Statutes 13.04, Subd.2, this data is being requested from you to determine if you are eligible for an award under the Job Creation Fund program. You are not required to provide the requested information, but failure to do so may result in the department's inability to determine your eligibility for an award pursuant to the criteria developed under the program's enabling legislation and rules. The data you provide is classified as private or non-public and cannot be shared without your permission except as specified in statute. Data Privacy Notice: per MN Statutes 13.591, Subdivision 1, certain data provided in this application is private or non- public data; this includes financial information about the business, including credit reports, financial statements, net worth calculations, business plans; income and expense projections; balance sheets; customer lists; income tax returns; and design, market, and feasibility studies not paid for with public funds. Per MN Statutes 116J.401, Subd. 3., certain data provided in this application is private data; this includes data collected on individuals pursuant to the operation of the Job Creation Fund Program. BUSINESS CERTIFICATION: Financial Assistance Certification: I hereby certify that the Job Creation Fund program is necessary to my business start- up or expansion and that without the Job Creation Fund my business start-up or expansion project would not happen to the extent outlined in the Job Creation Fund Application. I certify that I will not count any existing positions or employees moved or relocated from another of Minnesota facility where my business conducts operations as new permanent full-time employees for the purposes of fulfilling requirements of the Job Creation Fund Program. I certify will not terminate, lay-off, or reduce the working hours of an employee for the purpose of hiring an individual to fulfill the requirements of the Job Creation Fund Program. I certify that I will pay prevailing wages as required under the laws of the State of Minnesota if applicable. I certify I will enlist the services of the Workforce Center Business Services and will sign a Job Listing Agreement as a condition to receiving funds in excess of $200,000 from the MN Department of Employment and Economic Development. I have read the above statements and I agree to supply the information requested to the MN Department of Employment and Economic Development, Office of Business Finance with full knowledge of the information provided herein. I certify that all information provided herein is true and accurate and that the official signing this form has authorization to do so. Mike Blackston President Name/Title of Business Official: 03/21/2018 Signature of Business Official: ^�� ,�'"�--�� 'J_ �' Date: ■ F� LOCAL GOVERNMENT CERTIFICATION: hereby certify that as the local government contact for the proposed Job Creation Fund project, I have reviewed the application and business information. I agree to work with the Job Creation Fund Program business applicant to supply information requested by the MN Department of Employment and Economic Development, Economic Development Division. Jim Thares Name/Title of Local Government Contact: Signature of Local Government Contact: 070117 Date Consent to Release Private Business Employment and Wage Data Collected and Maintained by the Unemployment Insurance Program Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development (DEED) Your business is requesting financial assistance from a DEED business finance program that requires a commitment to create and/or retain jobs at selected wage levels. To help verify your current and future employment and wage levels during your participation in the program, DEED's Business Finance Office staff needs to review the monthly and quarterly employment and wage data that you submit to DEED's Unemployment Insurance Program (UIP). Because your UIP employment and wage data is private, it cannot be provided to Business Finance staff without your permission. The data that will be provided with your permission includes aggregate Minnesota employment levels for your company and at the project site, as well as specific wages and hours worked by your individual employees in Minnesota. It is important to note that data or information on specific individuals will be identify -protected so information such as social security numbers or names will not be provided. Once you provide permission for UIP to share the data, UIP can provide the data to the Office of Business Finance. You have the right to not provide consent by refusing to sign this consent form, however refusal may limit business finance program eligibility. The Office of Business Finance may not release the data to any parties other than to your business representatives and will only receive the data until all job creation and wage level commitments have been met. To view the data or if you have questions, please contact Bob Isaacson, Executive Director, Office of Business Finance at 651-259-7458 or bob.isaacson@state.mn.us. I give my permission for the Unemployment Insurance Program to release monthly and quarterly employment and wage data to DEED's Office of Business Finance; and 1 understand that this data will be used by the Office of Business Finance to verify job and wage goal attainment associated with financial assistance it provides. Mike i ke lacksto Digitally signed by Mike Bl -05'0 ' C'emp �/� � ��® � � �! � Date: 2018.03.21 09:33:27 -05'00' Bondhus Signature of Business Representative Company Date Mike Blackston President Printed Name of Business Representative Position i • '� ,�j til f ,�� .' • � ?•�. ; I t �+•t � .•� E-mail Phone EMPLOYMENT AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Targeted Population Designation Characteristics In order to qualify for Targeted Population Designation, the business must be majority (at least 51%) owned and operated by persons who meet certain qualifying characteristics. One or more individuals may be included when determining eligibility. Please provide information regarding qualifying characteristics of the owners)/operator(s). Check all that apply: ❑ Minority Minority group members are citizens (or lawfully admitted permanent residents) of the United States who belong to one or more of the following groups: (i) "Black Americans," which includes persons having origins in any of the Black racial groups of Africa; (ii) "Hispanic Americans," which includes persons of Mexican, Puerto Rican, Cuban, Dominican, Central or South American, or other Spanish or Portuguese culture or origin, regardless of race; (iii) "Native Americans," which includes persons who are American Indians, Eskimos, Aleuts, or Native Hawaiians; (iv) "Asian -Pacific Americans," which includes persons whose origins are from Japan, China, Taiwan, Korea, Burma (Myanmar), Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia (Kampuchea), Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia, the Philippines, Brunei, Samoa, Guam, the U.S. Trust Territories of the Pacific Islands (Republic of Palau), the Commonwealth of the Northern Marianas Islands, Macao, Fiji, Tonga, Kiribati, Juvalu, Nauru, Federated States of Micronesia, or Hong Kong; (v) "Subcontinent Asian Americans," which includes persons whose origins are from India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, the Maldives Islands, Nepal or Sri La n ka; ® Woman ❑ Veteran Veteran means a citizen of the United States or a resident alien who has been separated under honorable conditions from any branch of the armed forces of the United States after having served on active duty for 181 consecutive days or by reason of disability incurred while serving on active duty, or who has met the minimum active duty requirement as defined by Code of Federal Regulations, title 38, section 3.12x, or who has active military service certified under section 401, Public Law 95-202. The active military service must be certified by the United States secretary of defense as active military service and a discharge under honorable conditions must be issued by the secretary. ❑ Person(s) with disabilities The term "disability" is defined under the Americans with Disabilities Act and means, with respect to an individual: (A) a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities of such individual; (B) a record of such an impairment; or (C) being regarded as having such an impairment. certify that the business is at least 51% owned and operated by person(s) who are representative of one or more of the qualifying groups. Name/Title of Authorized Business Representative MMike� � � ��®� Digitally signed by Mike Blackston �� Qutc: 2018.03.21 09:34:34 -05'010' Date: ` 111/99— 1/�� Signature of Authorized Business Representative 0 Celebrating 50 Years _ o 1965-2015 March 20, 2018 Tom Washa Program Administrator -Principal 332 Minnesota Street, Suite E200 St Paul, MN 55101 Re: Job Creation Fund Program Application for Bondhus Corporation Dear Mr. Washa, Please accept this application for the JCF program on behalf of Bondhus Corporation. We have an opportunity to bring the manufacturing of a hand tool product line to Monticello, Minnesota. These tools are currently almost exclusively made in China. We are asking for a little bit of help to expand our existing manufacturing plant in Monticello, Minnesota in order to manufacture these tools in the US. We are asking for $195,000 from the Job Creation Fund to enable this project to move forward. If there are any questions about this application, please don't hesitate to contact me. Kind regards, Mike Blackston President Bondhus Corp 1400 East Broadway Monticello, MN 55362 763-295-2162 Tel: 763-295-2162 U.S. Toll Free: 800-328-8310 Fax: 763-2954440 Bondhus Corporation 1409 E. Broadway, P.D. Box 660 Monticello, MN 5W2 USA www.bondhus.com Job Creation Fund Application For Bondhus Corporation A.Business Description 1.Business overview, comvanv history and ownership Bondhus Corporation is a manufacturing company located in Monticello, Minnesota. The company produces a very wide range of hex -based hand tools; Hex keys (commonly known as "Allen wrenches"), ballpoint keys and screwdrivers, T -handles of all types, folding tool sets and many other specialty tools. Bondhus was founded in 1965 by John Bondhus. John sought to commercialize an idea he had for machining a ballpoint tip at the end of a hex key. The idea and the tools John initially made turned out to be time savers for tool makers who regularly removed and reinstalled socket head cap screws on tooling in manufacturing plants. After some success, and to expand his cap- abilities, John started manufacturing tools in a small, rented retail store in downtown Monticello. John made and sold, more and more tools. To support his growing business, John built a small, one story manufacturing plant, at the site of the current Monticello Bondhus facility, in 1974. This original building still stands today, but has been supplemented by four additions since. In 2017, Bondhus' product line of 14,000 items, supported sales to customers in the US, Canada, Mexico and more than 40 additional countries. When John Bondhus passed away 11+ years ago, his widow, Mary Kay Bondhus became the majority shareholder. The company has an ESOP which owns about 13% of the stock, and a few other shareholders own a small portion of the company (less than 10%). Mary Kay is active in the business and chairs the Board of Directors. The day to day operations of the company are attended to by a corporate staff which includes; Mike Blackston (CEO), Polly Grell (VP Finance), Nick Marchuk (VP Domestic Sales), Fred Leers (VP International Sales), Shannon Pramman (HR Manager). Bondhus is the parent company to three wholly owned subsidiaries: Bondhus Export, Inc., a Nevada corporation which has elected IC DISC status under the Internal Revenue Code; Bondhus Japan Ltd, a Japan corporation and sales/distribution company in Tokyo; and Heinrich Betz International Werkzeugfabrik, GmbH, a German limited partnership and manufacturing plant which produces quality screwdrivers and clamps. 2.Product or industry outlook Bondhus has been able to grow steadily, in part, because of its' promotion of "Made in USA" products. The company also has developed a specialized steel alloy and a custom heat treat process to give its tools the greatest strength and ductility possible. Bondhus tools typically generate 20% more torque than competitor tools, especially tools make in China. The company expects the new product line which will be added when this expansion is complete to grow sales by at least $3 million within the first five years after introduction. Bondhus has also been very successful consolidating the sales of their types of products with a customer and gradually eliminating virtually all competitor products from the customers' offering. Any new product lines added to its' offering will, after some effort, likely replace products which are currently supplied by foreign manufacturers to customers Bondhus will target with these products. 3.Proiected sales The company projects sales of its' new product line to reach the $500,000 level by the end of the first year, and then grow to $3,000,000 by the end of the fourth year. Based on the breakdown of direct sales to Minnesota distributors plus estimated sales from large retailers such as Amazon, MSC, McMaster Carr and Grainger directly to customers in Minnesota, the company projects overall sales and sales within Minnesota as follows: Total sales by vear end Sales to Minnesota users bv_ vear end Year 1 $500,000 $20,000 Year 2 $1,000,000 $40,000 Year 3 $2,000,000 $80,000 Year 4 $3,000,000 $120,000 4.Replacement of purchases from outside Minnesota The projected Minnesota sales in number three above, are all sales that should happen at the expense of some existing out of state supplier. As there are no other Minnesota manufacturers of these products, any sales made to Minnesota customers are expected to displace sales currently being made by out of state suppliers. There are only two small US manufacturers of these products. One in Florida and one in California. Virtually all of the current sales are purchases of items manufactured in China. 5.Markets The company has a strong sales presence throughout the US and internationally, in 44 countries. 2017 sales to domestic customers totaled 52% of total sales, sales to international customers totaled 28% and sales to private label customers totaled 20%. Domestic markets, percentage of US sales and Key customers include: • Industrial 49% (McMaster Carr, MSC, Amazon, Production Tool) • Hardware 14% (Fleet Farm, Northern Tool, Mid States, Orchard Supply) • Construction supply 11 % (Fastenal, Anchor, ORS Nasco, Integrated Supply) • Automotive 7% (Weisser, JB Tool, Sturtevants, Mac Tool) • Private label 19% (Park Tool, Stanley, Snap-On, Klein) International market breakdown: • Industrial 61% • Hardware 8% • Construction supply 12% • Automotive 11 % • Private label 8% Minnesota distributors of Bondhus products are many in number and include Mills Fleet Farm, Fastenal, Runnings, Northern Tool, Mac Tool, Blackhawk, Acme Tool, Viking Electric, Bomgaars, Applied Industrial, Ace Hardware, Border States, Delegard Tool, and many others. 6.Philanthropic Bondhus employees are quietly, but actively involved in support of the local community. The subject of their support varies from year to year, but recent support has been given to the following groups: • Monticello Help Center/Food Shelf • Monticello School District Back Pack Program • One Warm Coat • Monticello Middle School Robotics Club • The Dream Machine at Sts. Peter and Paul School • Operation Minnesota Nice • Bondhus was named a "Difference Maker" by Options Inc (Big Lake). • Additionally, Bondhus supports approximately 40 individuals and families in the Monticello area by subcontracting simple assembly operations directly with them. These are virtually all unskilled people, many with circumstances, such as medical conditions which prevent them from maintaining steady employment. Bondhus provides training and ongoing coaching and allows them to do as little or as much subcontract work as they are able. 7.17inancials (see attachments for more complete information) B.Prolect Description 8.Proiect Details To accommodate the manufacturing and packaging of an additional product line, the company is planning to add a 10,200 square foot addition onto the East end of the current building. Extensive regrading and shaping of the East lot will be required to provide easy access to delivery and pickup services. The West parking lot will be expanded to accommodate additional staff and to facilitate the separation of employee vehicle traffic, which will be clustered on the West end of the building, while the truck traffic which will be confined to the east end of the building. Mary Kay Bondhus owns the current building and land. The company has a long term lease in place with Ms. Bondhus. Once the construction of this addition is complete she will assume ownership of the mortgage for this addition and the company will lease the additional space on a long term lease. The company will own all of the equipment and machinery purchased for this addition and will be indebted for any loans related to those purchases. Building and Grounds a. East addition: Two floors, heavy construction @10,200 sq ft total 1,500,000 2016 2017 2018 (Prof) 2019 (Prof) Net Sales 19,343,198 21,338,446 21,901,542 23,000,000 Cost of Goods 12,094,134 13,463,971 13,845,701 14,540,123 Operating Expense 5,996,804 6,146,441 6,327,541 6,430,000 Misc Income/Exp 336,370 365.811 563,623 681,613 Net Income 915,890 1,362,223 1,164,677 1,348,264 B.Prolect Description 8.Proiect Details To accommodate the manufacturing and packaging of an additional product line, the company is planning to add a 10,200 square foot addition onto the East end of the current building. Extensive regrading and shaping of the East lot will be required to provide easy access to delivery and pickup services. The West parking lot will be expanded to accommodate additional staff and to facilitate the separation of employee vehicle traffic, which will be clustered on the West end of the building, while the truck traffic which will be confined to the east end of the building. Mary Kay Bondhus owns the current building and land. The company has a long term lease in place with Ms. Bondhus. Once the construction of this addition is complete she will assume ownership of the mortgage for this addition and the company will lease the additional space on a long term lease. The company will own all of the equipment and machinery purchased for this addition and will be indebted for any loans related to those purchases. Building and Grounds a. East addition: Two floors, heavy construction @10,200 sq ft total 1,500,000 (Including basic electric service, lighting and HVAC) b. New West parking lot plus mill & recoat existing lot 136,000 c. Re -side West and North faces of existing building (stop at new precast) 100,000 d. Extensive grading and contouring 40,000 e. Replace main entrance doors and glass above 10,000 f. Additional restrooms 20,000 Sub Total Building $1,806,000 Equinment and Machinery g. Compressor + electrical 60,000 h. Tormax turning machines 125,000 i. Cut off system 48,000 j. Milling machines 90,000 k. One small heat treat furnace 100,000 1. Contingency 75,000 Sub Total Machinery $498,000 Projected Project Total $2,304,000 9.Lease Details As noted above, Mary Kay Bondhus will assume ownership of the addition and the mortgage once construction is complete. The company and Bondhus will sign an addendum to the current long term lease and the company will make monthly lease payments to Ms. Bondhus to cover the mortgage payment. Ms. Bondhus has offered to pledge the current building and land as collateral if our lender, BMO Harris, requires it. I O.Effects Of This Proiect On The Local And State Economies The addition of a new product line to the Bondhus offering will result in new job opportunities in Monticello and sales opportunities throughout Minnesota. The additional product line not only results in a sales increase related to these new items, but sales of existing Bondhus products will increase as well, as some distributors replace existing products provided by other suppliers as part of the effort to take on the new product line. Purchases from suppliers located in Minnesota should increase as sales of the new product line begin. The company does quite a bit of printing locally. Its plastic injection molding supplier is located in Maple Grove, Minnesota. Its plating supplier is in Isle, Minnesota. The company's steel hauler is Long Haul trucking, located in Albertville, Minnesota. Local sub contract machining suppliers such as Accura Automatics and Ellison Machining would also benefit. All of these companies and many others will see increased business activity as a result of this proj ect. 11.Monticello Citv Assistance The City of Monticello has offered a $200,000 low interest loan from the Monticello Small Cities Economic Development Set Aside Revolving Loan Fund. Application for these funds has been made concurrently with this JCF application. 12.Line Item Construction Estimates Buildiniz and Grounds a. East addition: Two floors, heavy construction @10,200 sq ft total 1,500,000 (Including basic electric service, lighting and HVAC) b. New West parking lot plus mill & recoat existing lot 136,000 c. Re -side West and North faces of existing building (Renovation) 100,000 d. Extensive grading and contouring 40,000 e. Replace main entrance doors and glass above (Renovation) 10,000 f. Additional restrooms 20,000 Sub Total Building $1,806,000 Equipment and Machinery g. Compressor + electrical 60,000 h. Tormax turning machines 125,000 i. Cut off system 48,000 j. Milling machines 90,000 k. One small heat treat furnace 100,000 1. Contingency 75,000 Sub Total Machinery $498,000 Projected Project Total $2,304,000 13.13ank Commitment Letter Please see attached commitment from BMO Harris. The company has already invested or has committed to expenses for this project totaling approximately $75,000 for site survey and borings, as built drawings for existing structures, a new site plan with revised highway exits and preliminary engineering and plans for the new addition. This work has been done to determine feasibility of the project and would be considered an equity investment in the project by the company. C.Business competitors (14, 15, 16) There are no manufacturers of this product in Minnesota. There are only resellers of US made products manufactured by Qualtool, located in Tavares, Florida and Zephyr Tool, located in Inglewood, Ca. or resellers of products manufactured outside of the US with brand names like Irwin, Makita, Milwaukee, Wera, Dewalt, Oria, Hitachi, Wiha, Harbor Freight, Ryobi, Gear Wrench and many, many others. All of the similar products sold at Home Depot, Lowes, Menards and other large retailers are almost exclusively manufactured in China. Bondhus plans to make these products in Minnesota from steel made in the US using its' proprietary steel alloy and custom heat treat process to produce "higher" quality tools. Bondhus tools will be differentiated in the various sales channels three ways: "Made in USA", high quality and Bondhus Brand. D.Job and wage information 17. 4th quarter 2017 payroll report for permanent full time emplovees (see attached) Basic Facts 1. 2017 sales: $21 million+ I2. Employees: We have 80+ employees carrying out tooling, machining, assembly, shipping, accounting and sales related tasks. We also keep approximately 55 subcontractors busy with assembly and machining work. 3. The company is approximately 12% ESOP owned 4. 60,000 square feet of building space in Monticello is focused on manufacturing and shipping approximately 14,000 SKU's of hex and screwdriver oriented hand tools; 1100 order lines per day and 170,000 tools per day 5. We are aggressively working to be the sole supplier of the products we make to customers such as Stanley, McMaster Carr, Snap -on, Fasten], Fleet Farm, etc What Have We Been Doing/Where Are We Headed 1. In 2012, our majority owner and our Board asked company management to begin pursuing more aggressive growth opportunities. As a result of this initiative, we completed two acquisitions; a. In 2014 we acquired the assets of a small California company and incorporated their products into the Bondhus product line. b. In 2016, we acquired a small German screwdriver company. We have left the management and the production facility in place in Germany. Our Bondhus sales team has taken over the sales efforts. 2. There are several reasons we have pursued acquisitions over the last 4 years instead of expanding our existing Monticello plant, or moving to a new facility. a. Our existing plant is optimized for the manufacture, warehousing and shipment of our current product line. b. It has always been our belief it would be expensive and/or difficult to expand our existing Monticello plant because it would require additions on both ends of the building and resolution of driveway entrance, parking lot and water supply issues. We have been dose to acquu mg three other companies over the last twelve months, but each company had at least one negative and we have chosen to not complete any of these transactions. Before we begin work with another potential acquisition, we felt it a good time to stop and examine our options related to expanding the existing Monticello plant or possibly moving to a new. lower cost location with better options for additional/future expansion. • Page 1 I City Council Agenda 03/26/2018 2I. Consideration of approving a request to adopt Ordinance No. 695, 696, and 697 amending the Monticello Zoning Ordinance Chapter 2, Section 4 Specific Review Procedures & Requirements, Chapter 4, Section 11 Building Materials, and Chapter 5, Section 3 Accessory Use Standards. Applicant: Citv of Monticello. (NAC) Planning Case Number: 2018-009 A. REFERENCE & BACKGROUND Request(s): Zoning Ordinance Amendments for: 1. Establishing timing provisions between PUD application stages and reviews. 2. Supplementing building materials standards in residential and commercial districts by addressing roofing materials. 3. Allowing for the construction of columbarium structures within cemeteries. Deadline for Decision: NA Project Description: Consider zoning ordinance amendments for the noted topics, based on previous staff and public experience. ANALYSIS The proposed amendments are three separate proposals to address issues which have arisen over the past several months. Staff comment is consolidated in this report, but each of the three should be addressed as separate actions. PUD Processing. The first is a proposed amendment that is designed to specify the amount of time that an applicant can have between the various stages of PUD review. Currently, the ordinance is silent on timing, which can become an issue for consistent City review when proposals extend over many months or even years. It is the position of staff that creating reasonable timeframes will help ensure that approved projects with continue through the process in an expeditious manner, and that if stalled, the applicant will have to come back for reconsidered approvals. The amendment suggests that once an applicant has gone through a Concept Review, receiving comments as to the issues raised by the Planning Commission, City Council and staff, a Development Stage application should be filed within 6 months of the Concept Review. Since the Concept Review is not a formal application, and it is optional on the part of the applicant, the timeline established by this amendment would not be binding. Instead, it is suggestive of an intent to proceed to the next stage while the issues are still fresh in the minds of the applicant, the City, and of the neighborhood. City Council Agenda 03/26/2018 The amendment proposes a much tighter timeline between Development Stage PUD and Final Stage PUD. In this situation, an applicant has 60 days to submit Final Stage PUD documents. The purpose of this shorter timeline is to ensure that the project does not stall and lose continuity in review, but also due to limits on the City's consideration and review of zoning applications under MN State Section 15.99 (the "60 day rule"). For most PUD applications, it is necessary for applicants to waive the 60 day review authority, but this amendment makes the timing aspect somewhat clearer. A final aspect of this proposal is to add a clause which ensures that the PUD approval — which occurs by rezoning the property to PUD — is not final until all conditions and requirements have been met. As a result, a project that stalls and does not go forward would not result in a PUD zoning designation. 2. Building Materials — Roofing. It has been observed by staff that in certain applications, the City may wish to address roofing materials of proposed residential and commercial buildings. However, the building materials section of the ordinance speaks to "exterior facades", walls, and "finishes" which are clearly focused on the vertical walls of a building, and do not address roofing, which can be a prominent aspect of the architectural design. As such, the proposed amendment is designed to address allowable roofing materials, including shingles and metal (primarily copper and steel). One alternative suggested in the text of the proposed ordinance is whether the City would accommodate "standing seam" metal roofing on residential buildings. An example photo of standing seam installation is shown in the accompanying photos. This type of roofing is common on commercial buildings, but is less common in this region on residential structures. Its primary 1A popularity is in the western U.S., particularly in fire -prone areas. The ordinance language suggested would allow only heavy gauge steel, which staff defines heavy gauge steel as equivalent to 26 gauge or better, for standing seam. All other materials must resemble common residential roofing materials. 3. Columbarium Structures. With the increasing use of cremation, requests for options to full burial sites have been made for the City's cemeteries. In review of the current ordinance, the zoning language does not address structures in the cemeteries with any clarity. As such, the proposed amendment would make columbarium structures a permitted accessory use to Oil City Council Agenda 03/26/2018 cemeteries, which are allowed in the City's agriculture and residential districts. The amendment places a few restrictions on these structures, primarily ensuring that they are set back from adjoining properties, and that they meet the other applicable accessory building requirements for the district in which they are located. Planning Commission Recommendation The Commission reviewed the proposed amendments and held a public hearing on the proposed amendments on March 6th, 2018. No public was present to comment on the proposed amendments. The Commissioners requested clarification from Steve Grittman on the types of roofing which would be allowed under the proposed ordinance amendment alternatives. Mr. Grittman clarified that heavy gauge steel could be used in standing seam steel roofs under the first alternative. All other materials types, including steel, must resemble traditional roofing materials. The second alternative would not allow standing seam metal. The Commission's motion on that amendment was to allow the first alternative, permitting heavy gauge steel standing seam roofing. Staff defines heavy gauge steel as equivalent to 26 gauge or better. Commissioner Murdoff inquired whether columbariums could be added to the definition for cemetery versus adding them as a separate accessory use. Mr. Grittman confirmed. Ultimately, the Commission left the ordinance for columbariums as proposed. The Commission motioned to approve, with 5-0 votes, for each proposed amendment. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS Decision I — PUD Timing Ordinance Amendment 1. Motion to adopt Ordinance 695 establishing timeframes for PUD stage applications, based on findings in Resolution No. PC -2018-005. 2. Motion to deny adoption of Ordinance 695 establishing timeframes for PUD stage applications, based on findings to be made by the City Council. 3. Motion to table action on the proposed amendment. Decision 2 — Roofing Materials Ordinance Amendment 1. Motion to adopt Ordinance 696 establishing materials requirements for roofing on residential and commercial buildings, based on findings in Resolution No. PC - 2018 -006. 2. Motion to deny adoption of Ordinance 696 establishing materials requirements for roofing on residential and commercial buildings, based on findings to be made by the City Council. 3. Motion to table action on the proposed amendment. 3 City Council Agenda 03/26/2018 Decision 3 — Columbarium Ordinance Amendment 1. Motion to adopt Ordinance 697 establishing regulations for columbarium structures in cemeteries, based on findings in Resolution No. PC 2018-007. 2. Motion to deny adoption of Ordinance 697 establishing regulations for columbarium structures in cemeteries, based on findings to be made by the City Council. 3. Motion to table action on the proposed amendment. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends Alternative #1 for each action requested above for approval of the resolutions and ordinances based on the findings in the resolutions. D. SUPPORTING DATA A. PUD Timing Ordinance No. 695 B. Roofing Materials Ordinance No. 696 C. Columbarium Ordinance No. 697 D. PUD Timing Resolution No. PC -2018-005 E. Roofing Materials Resolution No. PC -2018-006 F. Columbarium Resolution No. PC -2018-007 G. Monticello Zoning Ordinance, Excerpts L! ORDINANCE NO. 695 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 10 OF THE MONTICELLO ZONING CODE, CHAPTER 2 SECTION 2.4 (D) RELATING TO THE SUBMISSION OF DEVELOPMENT STAGE AND FINAL STAGE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTICELL0, MINNESOTA HEREBY ORDAINS: Section 1. Chapter 2, Section 2.4 (D)(9)(b)(i) is hereby amended to read as follows: 2.4 (D)(9)(b) (i) Initiation of Proceedings. Requests for PUD Development Stage, rezoning to PUD and Preliminary Plat shall be initiated by application of the property owner or other person having authority to file an application pursuant to Section 2.3(B), Authority to File Applications. The Development Stage PUD request shall be subject to timelines set by Minn. Stat. Section 15.99. If the applicant has processed an optional Concent Proposal review pursuant to Section 2.4 (D)(9)(a), the Development State application shall be submitted within six (6) months of such review. If more than six (6) months have elapsed since the Concept Review, the application must be processed as a new Concept Proposal unless the Community Development Department determines to waive this provision. Section 2. Chapter 2, Section 2.4 (D)(9)(c)(i)(1) is hereby amended to read as follows: 2.4 (D)(9)(c)(i) A Final Stage PUD plan and final plat that conforms with the approved Development Stage PUD and preliminary plat and associated PUD rezoning ordinance shall be submitted no later than sixtv (60) days following the Development State PUD approval for review and feviewed within the time allotted by Minn. Stat. Section 15.99. Applicants may request an extension for such submittal for a maximum of an additional six (6) months), and shall request waivers for anv statutory time limits as necessarv. Applications which fail to meet this deadline shall be deemed void and shall require review and re-application according to the Development Stage PUD process of this ordinance. Section 3. Chapter 2, Section 2.4 (D)(9)(c) is hereby amended to add the following: 2.4 (D)(9)(c) (v) Final PUD Approval shall occur by adoption of a rezoning ordinance for the subject property specifying the uses, standards, and other requirements of said PUD zoning district. Such ordinance shall include an effective date clause which may delay the effective date of the ordinance until such time as the applicant has met each of the conditions of approval required by the City Council, in addition to other requirements including publication. No approvals are valid, and no permits may be issued, until the ordinance takes effect. If the Final PUD is not approved by the City Council, or the applicant fails to meet the conditions as described, the ordinance shall not take effect, and the subject property shall retain its previous zoning designation. Section 4. The City Clerk is hereby directed to make the changes required by this Ordinance as part of the Official Monticello City Code, Title 10, Zoning Ordinance, and to renumber the tables and chapters accordingly as necessary to provide the intended effect of this Ordinance. The City Clerk is further directed to make necessary corrections to any internal citations and diagrams that result from such amendments, provided that such changes retain the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance as has been adopted. Section 4. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage and publication. Revisions will be made online after adoption by Council. Copies of the complete Zoning Ordinance are available online and at Monticello City Hall. ADOPTED BY the Monticello City Council this -- day of --, 2018. CITY OF MONTICELLO Brian Stumpf, Mayor ATTEST: Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator VOTING IN FAVOR: VOTING IN OPPOSITION: ORDINANCE NO. 696 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 10 OF THE MONTICELLO ZONING CODE, CHAPTER 4, SECTION 4.11, RELATING TO PROVISIONS FOR METAL ROOFING REQUIREMENTS IN RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTICELL0, MINNESOTA HEREBY ORDAINS: Section 1. Chapter 4, Section 4.11(C) and Section 4.11(D) are hereby amended to add the following: 4.11 (C) (5) Roofing Materials. Roofing materials in residential districts, including for principal and accessory buildings, shall consist of shingles made of asphalt, fiberglass, durable rot -resistant wood (such as cedar), stone (such as slate) or architectural metal (including steel and copper). Heavy gauge steel or copper may be used for standing -seam roofing. Steel may be used only when designed to resemble traditional residential architectural roofing materials. Section 2. Chapter 4, Section 4.11(D)(5) is hereby amended to read as follows: 4.11 (D) (5) Metal Roofing. Metal shall be an allowed roofing material in the `B", Business Districts, provided such material is designed to resemble traditional commercial architecture and/or is designed to complement the architectural design of the building. (5)) (6) Building Materials and Design for the CCD District: All buildings within the CCD shall meet the materials and design standards of the Comprehensive Plan as defined by tlie+epeA "Embma Mentieelle—' Appendix B, DesignGuidelines the Downtown Monticello Small Area Plan Amendment, the requirements of the CCD District, as well as the standards in Section 4.11 of this ordinance. Section 3. The City Clerk is hereby directed to make the changes required by this Ordinance as part of the Official Monticello City Code, Title 10, Zoning Ordinance, and to renumber the tables and chapters accordingly as necessary to provide the intended effect of this Ordinance. The City Clerk is further directed to make necessary corrections to any internal citations and diagrams that result from such amendments, provided that such changes retain the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance as has been adopted. Section 4. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage and publication. Revisions will be made online after adoption by Council. Copies of the complete Zoning Ordinance are available online and at Monticello City Hall. ADOPTED BY the Monticello City Council this day of , 2018. CITY OF MONTICELLO Brian Stumpf, Mayor ATTEST: Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator VOTING IN FAVOR: VOTING IN OPPOSITION: ORDINANCE NO. 697 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 10 OF THE MONTICELLO ZONING CODE, CHAPTER 5, TABLE 5-3, AND SECTION 5.3 (D) (11), RELATING TO THE PROVISION FOR COLUMARIUM STRUCTURES AS ACCESSORY USE TO CEMETERIES. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTICELL0, MINNESOTA HEREBY ORDAINS: Section 1. Chapter 5, Table 5-3 is hereby amended to add the following: Columbarium as a permitted accessory use to Cemeteries in the A-0, R -A, R-1, R-2, T -N, R-3, and R-4 zoning districts, subject to the additional requirements of Section 5.3 (D)(11). Section 2. Chapter 5, Section 5.3(D) is hereby amended to add the following: Section 5.3(D) (11) Columbarium. Accessory use to Cemeteries only. Subject to the following: (a) Columbarium Structures shall set back a minimum distance of fifty (50) feet from all lot lines and public right of way. (b) The principal use cemetery shall comply with all other applicable requirements of the zoning ordinance, with the exception of the requirement for distance from I-94. (c) No portion of the Columbarium shall exceed height requirements for accessory buildings in the district in which the structure is located. (d) The Columbarium shall be constructed of masonry materials for all exterior surfaces, with architectural metals and glass for details and openings only. Section 3. The City Clerk is hereby directed to make the changes required by this Ordinance as part of the Official Monticello City Code, Title 10, Zoning Ordinance, and to renumber the tables and chapters accordingly as necessary to provide the intended effect of this Ordinance. The City Clerk is further directed to make necessary corrections to any internal citations and diagrams that result from such amendments, provided that such changes retain the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance as has been adopted. Section 4. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage and publication. Revisions will be made online after adoption by Council. Copies of the complete Zoning Ordinance are available online and at Monticello City Hall. ADOPTED BY the Monticello City Council this _ day of , 2018. CITY OF MONTICELLO Brian Stumpf, Mayor ATTEST: Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator VOTING IN FAVOR: VOTING IN OPPOSITION: CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2018-005 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AMENDMENTS TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE RELATING TO APPLICATION TIMING FOR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPENT APPLICATIONS WHEREAS, the City finds that extended time between PUD stages of review can lead to lost efficiency in zoning administration; and WHEREAS, facilitating PUD reviews in limited timeframes encourages clearer compliance with Comprehensive Plan objectives; and WHEREAS, the current city ordinances do not make adequate provision for such timing; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on March 6th, 2018 on the application and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: 1. Changes to the ordinance are necessary to ensure the more efficient timing. 2. Establishing the proposed timing is consistent with the City's goals for new development. 3. The proposed amendments comprise a superior opportunity for Planned Unit Development to be reviewed quickly and efficiently. 4. The proposed amendments provide reasonable regulation of the potential PUD development and ensures that stalled projects do not create ongoing zoning issues. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, that the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the Monticello City Council approves the proposed amendment to the zoning ordinance. ADOPTED this 6th day of March, 2018, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. ATTEST: Angel CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2018-005 MONTICELLO PLANNP By: Brad, ,Chair Development Director CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. IAC -2018-006 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AMENDMENTS TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE RELATING TO ROOFING BUILDING MATERIALS IN RESIDENTRAL AND COMMERCIAL DISTRRCTS WHEREAS, the City finds that regulation of roofing materials is important to ensure attractive and functional buildings; and WHEREAS, regulation of roofing materials is an important factor in meeting the intent of the Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, regulation of roofing materials would be consistent with the City's regulation of other building materials, and with the intent of the Zoning Ordinance generally; and WHEREAS, the current city ordinances do not make adequate provision for such materials; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on March 6th, 2018 on the application and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: 1. Changes to the ordinance are necessary to ensure reasonable regulations. 2. Establishing the proposed regulations is consistent with the City's goals for new development. 3. The proposed amendments ensure development and building materials that are consistent with contemporary buildings in the region. 4. The proposed amendments provide reasonable regulation of the issue to ensure that common building components are identified in the language of ordinances.. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, that the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the Monticello City Council approves the proposed amendment to the zoning ordinance. ADOPTED this 60' day of March, 2018, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. ATTEST: Angel CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2018-006 MONTICELLO PLANNING COM SSION jBrale, air Development Director CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2018-007 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AMENDMENTS TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE RELATING TO COLUMBARIUM STRUCTURES AS ACCESSORY BUILDINGS IN CEMETERIES WHEREAS, the City finds that accommodation of columbarium structures in cemeteries is consistent with contemporary practice; and WHEREAS, allowance of columbaria as accessory structures is consistent with the purpose and intent for provision of cemetery space in the City; and WHEREAS, regulation columbaria is necessary to both clarify the allowance of such structures and manage the attributes thereof; and WHEREAS, the current city ordinances do not make adequate provision for such structures; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on March 6"', 2018 on the application and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: 1. Changes to the ordinance are necessary to ensure reasonable regulations. 2. Establishing the proposed regulations is consistent with the City's goals for cemetery use and development. 3. The proposed amendments ensure development and building materials that are consistent with the contemporary use of such lands. 4. The proposed amendments provide reasonable regulation of the issue to ensure that common aspects of columbarium construction are identified in the language of ordinances. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, that the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the Monticello City Council approves the proposed amendment to the zoning ordinance. ADOPTED this 6t' day of March, 2018, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2018-007 ATTEST: MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION ;lopment Director CHAPTER 2: APPLICATION REVIEWS AND PROCEDURES Section 2.4 Specific Review Procedures & Requirements Subsection (0) Planned Unit Developments (iv) PUD Concept Plan Proposal Review Upon receiving a PUD concept plan proposal, the Community Development Department shall: 1. Schedule a joint meeting of the Planning Commission and City Council and shall provide notice of the meeting to all property owners within 350' of the property boundary of the proposal. During the concurrent meeting, the Planning Commission and City Council may make comment on the merit, needed changes, and suggested conditions which may assist the proposer in future application for proposed rezoning and PUD development plan. a. The Planning Commission and City Council may also take comment from the public as part of the joint meeting. b. The Council and Planning Commission shall make no formal decision as part of the consideration The City Council and Planning Commission's comments are explicitly not an approval or decision on the project, and are intended to represent preliminary feedback related to this PUD ordinance, the applicable zoning regulations, and the Comprehensive Plan. (b) PUD Development Stage, Preliminary Plat, and Rezoning (i) Initiation of Proceedings Requests for PUD Development Stage, rezoning to PUD and Preliminary Plat shall be initiated by application of the property owner or other person having authority to file an application pursuant to Section 2.3(B), Authority to File Applications. The Development Stage PUD request shall be subject to timelines set by Minn. Stat. Section 15.99. (ii) Application 1. All applications for rezoning to PUD and Preliminary Plat shall be in accordance with Section 2.3, Common Review Requirements. 2. The application for rezoning to PUD shall be in accordance with Section 2.4(B), Zoning Ordinance Text and Zoning Map Amendments. 3. The application for Preliminary Plat (as applicable) shall be in accordance with City Code Title 11, Chapter 4, Data Required for Preliminary and Final Plats; and shall include the additional information requirements listed in Section 2.4(P)(9)(c)(iii) below to be considered complete (except as exempted by the Community Development Department). City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 67 CHAPTER 2: APPLICATION REVIEWS AND PROCEDURES Section 2.4 Specific Review Procedures & Requirements Subsection (0) Planned Unit Developments 4. If the PUD is proposed to develop over a timeframe exceeding two years, a PUD Phasing Plan for the entire project (to be completed in phases) may be submitted. Subsequent PUD Final Plan applications would only grant approval for an individual phase. (iii) Specific PUD Development Stage, Preliminary Plat and Rezoning Submittal Requirements An applicant shall provide a separate PUD Development Stage Plan clearly delineating the proposed development and all features not consistent with underlying zoning regulations (e.g. setback deviations). At a minimum, the plan should show: 1. All required information per Section 2.4(P)(9)(b)(iii) of this ordinance. 2. Administrative information (including identification of the drawing as a "PUD Development Stage Plan," the proposed name of the project, contact information for the developer and individual preparing the plan, signature of the surveyor and civil engineer certifying the document, date of plan preparation or revision, and a graphic scale and true north arrow); 3. Area calculations for gross land area, wetland areas, wetland buffers, right-of-way dedications, conservation areas, and proposed public and private parks; 4. Existing zoning district(s); 5. Layout of proposed lots with future lot and block numbers. The perimeter boundary line of the subdivision should be distinguishable from the other property lines. Denote outlots planned for public dedication and/or open space (schools, parks, etc.); 6. Area calculations for each parcel; 7. Proposed setbacks on each lot (forming the building pad) and calculated buildable area; 8. Proposed gross hardcover allowance per lot (if applicable); 9. Existing contours at intervals of two feet. Contours must extend a minimum of 200 feet beyond the boundary of the parcel(s) in question; 10. Delineation of wetlands and/or watercourses over the property and within 200 feet of the perimeter of the subdivision parcel; 11. Delineation of the ordinary high water levels of all water bodies; Page 68 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance CHAPTER 2: APPLICATION REVIEWS AND PROCEDURES Section 2.4 Specific Review Procedures & Requirements Subsection (0) Planned Unit Developments 12. Grading drainage and erosion control plan prepared by a registered professional engineer, providing all information outlined in Monticello Zoning Code, Chapter 4, Section 10(C); 13. Location, width, and names of existing and proposed streets within and immediately adjacent to the subdivision parcel; 14. Easements and rights-of-way within or adjacent to the subdivision parcel(s); 15. The location and orientation of proposed buildings; 16. Colored building elevations which detail the materials being used; 17. Proposed sidewalks and trails; 18. Vehicular circulation system showing location and dimension for all driveways, parking spaces, parking lot aisles, service roads, loading areas, fire lanes, emergency access, if necessary, public and private streets, alleys, sidewalks, bike paths, direction of traffic flow and traffic control devices; 19. Lighting location, style and mounting and light distribution plan. 20. Proposed parks, common areas, and preservation easements (indicate public vs. private if applicable); 21. Landscape plan prepared by a qualified professional providing all information outlined in Monticello Zoning Ordinance Section 4.1(D) including planting counts, sizes and species; 22. Location and detail of signage providing all pertinent information outlined in Monticello Zoning Ordinance Section 2.4(K)(3)(b). 23. Location, access and screening detail of large trash handling and recycling collection areas in compliance with the requirements of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Section 5.3(D)(34). 24. Any other information as directed by the Community Development Department. (iv) PUD Development Stage, Preliminary Plat and Rezoning to PUD Review 1. The application for rezoning to PUD shall be reviewed in accordance with Section 2.4(B), Zoning Ordinance Text and Zoning Map Amendments. 2. The application for Preliminary Plat shall be reviewed in accordance with City Code Title 11, Chapter 3, Section 2, Preliminary Plat Procedure. City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 69 CHAPTER 2: APPLICATION REVIEWS AND PROCEDURES Section 2.4 Specific Review Procedures & Requirements Subsection (0) Planned Unit Developments 3. As part of the review process for both applications, the Community Development Department shall generate an analysis of the proposal against the expectations for PUDs and this ordinance to formulate a recommendation regarding the rezoning to the Planning Commission and City Council. 4. The Planning Commission shall hold a public hearing and consider the application's consistency with the intent and purpose of the PUD and comprehensive plan goals. The Planning Commission shall make recommendations to the City Council on the merit, needed changes, and suggested conditions of the proposed rezoning, preliminary plat and PUD development plan. 5. In approving or denying the PUD Development Stage application and ordinance to rezone the subject property to PUD, the City Council shall make findings on the following: a. Whether the PUD plan is consistent with the city's comprehensive plan; b. Whether the PUD plan is tailored to the specific characteristics of the site and achieves a higher quality of site planning and greater public benefits than would be achieved under conventional provisions of the ordinance; c. Whether the PUD plan addresses the purpose and intent of the PUD rezoning laid out in Section 2.4(P)(1), and the public values statement established at the beginning of the process; d. Whether the PUD plan addresses the expectations of a PUD laid out in Section 2.4(P)(7); e. Whether the PUD plan maintains or improves the efficiency of public streets, utilities, and other public services; f. Whether the PUD plan results in development compatible with existing adjacent and future guided land uses; g. Whether the PUD can be accommodated by existing public services, such as parks, police, fire, administration, and utilities, or the developer has provided for the growth and extension of such services as a component of the PUD. h. Whether the PUD is designed to take advantage of, and preserve, the natural features of the subject property, including waterways, forested areas, natural prairie, topography, views, etc. 6. An ordinance rezoning the property shall be prepared by the City, for review at the Development Stage PUD, but adoption of such ordinance shall occur only upon approval of the Final Stage PUD. Page 70 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance CHAPTER 2: APPLICATION REVIEWS AND PROCEDURES Section 2.4 Specific Review Procedures & Requirements Subsection (0) Planned Unit Developments (c) PUD Final Plat (i) Initiation of Proceedings 1. A Final Stage PUD plan and final plat that conforms with the approved Development Stage PUD and preliminary plat and associated PUD rezoning ordinance shall be submitted and reviewed within the time allotted by Minn. Stat. Section 15.99. 2. The request for PUD Final Stage and Final Plat shall be initiated by application of the property owner or other person having authority to file an application pursuant to Section 2.3(B), Authority to File Applications. (ii) Application 1. All applications for PUD Final Stage and Final Plat shall be in accordance with Section 2.3, Common Review Requirements. 2. The application for PUD Final Plat shall be in accordance with City Code Title 11, Chapter 4, Data Required for Preliminary and Final Plats. 3. In addition to general city code requirements, applications for a PUD Final Stage and Final Plat shall also include at least the information in Section 2.4(P)(9)(d)(iii) below to be considered complete (except as exempted by the Community Development Department). (iii) Specific PUD Final Stage and Final Plat Submittal Requirements 1. If a PUD Master Plan for the entire project was submitted and approved as part of the PUD Development Stage, an updated Master Plan shall be submitted incorporating all changes required by the PUD Development Stage approval. 2. The PUD Development Stage Plan shall be updated to incorporate all changes required by the PUD, preliminary plat and rezoning approvals. This document must clearly show all deviations from standard zoning being approved as part of the PUD. 3. The City shall prepare, and the applicant shall execute, a developer's agreement which references all PUD plans, development phasing, required improvements, completion dates for improvements, the required letter of credit, all required development fees, escrows, and warranties, and any other information deemed necessary by the City. City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 71 CHAPTER 2: APPLICATION REVIEWS AND PROCEDURES Section 2.4 Specific Review Procedures & Requirements Subsection (0) Planned Unit Developments 4. The City shall, upon approval of the PUD Final Stage, recording of the Final Plat, and execution of the PUD developer's agreement, publish the PUD Ordinance specifying land use, densities, performance standards, and ongoing general obligations of occupants of the PUD. Such ordinance shall create a zoning district that is specific to the property for which the PUD was applied, and shall be designated in such a way as to be able to mark the official zoning map to identify the PUD ordinance. The PUD ordinance shall also designate that such property is thereby rezoned to the PUD district as adopted. 5. Up-to-date title evidence for the subject property in a form acceptable to the City shall be provided as part of the application for the PUD Final Plat. 6. Developer shall provide warranty deeds for Property being dedicated to the City for all parks, outlots, etc., free from all liens and encumbrances except as otherwise waived by the City Council. 7. Developer shall provide all easement dedication documents for easements not shown on the final plat including those for trails, ingress/egress, etc., together with all necessary consents to the easement by existing encumbrancers of the property. (iv) PUD Final Stage and Final Plat Review The application for PUD Final Stage and Final Plat shall be considered by the City Council at a public meeting, following a review and report by the Community Development Department. Approval of the PUD Final Stage and Final Plat shall be by simple majority vote of the City Council, except where State law may specifically require a supermajority. (10) PUD Amendments Approved PUD's may be amended from time to time as a result of unforeseen circumstances, overlooked opportunities, or requests from a developer. At such a time, the applicant shall make an application to the city for a PUD amendment. All such amendments will be processed as one of the following: Page 72 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance CHAPTER 2: APPLICATION REVIEWS AND PROCEDURES Section 2.4 Specific Review Procedures & Requirements Subsection (0) Planned Unit Developments (a) Administrative Amendment — The Community Development Department may approve minor changes in the location, placement, and height of buildings if such changes are required by engineering or other circumstances, provided the conform to the review criteria applied by the Planning Commission and City Council, and are consistent with all requirements of the PUD ordinance. Under no circumstances shall an administrative amendment allow additional stories to buildings, additional lots, or changes to designated uses established as part of the PUD. An Administrative Amendment shall be memorialized via letter signed by the Community Development Director and recorded against the PUD property. (b) PUD Adiustment — an adjustment to a PUD may be made through review and approval by a simple majority vote of the City Council with or without referral to the Planning Commission. For a PUD Adjustment, the applicant shall follow the procedures and requirements of the PUD Final Stage as identified in this Chapter. A PUD Adjustment shall be memorialized with an amendment to the PUD Development Agreement, executed by the City and applicant, and recorded against the PUD property. To qualify for this review, the minor adjustment shall not: (i) Eliminate, diminish or be disruptive to the preservation and protection of sensitive site features. (ii) Eliminate, diminish or compromise the high quality of site planning, design, landscaping or building materials. (iii) Alter significantly the location of buildings, parking areas or roads. (iv) Increase or decrease the number of residential dwelling units by more than five percent. (v) Increase the gross floor area of non-residential buildings by more than three percent or increase the gross floor area of any individual building by more than five percent (residential lots not guided for specific structure sizes are excluded from this requirement). (vi) Increase the number of stories of any building. (vii) Decrease the amount of open space or alter it in such a way as to change its original design or intended function or use. (viii) Create non-compliance with any condition attached to the approval of the Final PUD Plan. City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 73 CHAPTER 2: APPLICATION REVIEWS AND PROCEDURES Section 2.4 Specific Review Procedures & Requirements Subsection (0) Planned Unit Developments (c) PUD Amendment — any change not qualifying for an administrative amendment or a PUD adjustment shall require a PUD amendment. An application to amend a PUD shall be administered in the same manner as that required for an initial PUD beginning at PUD Development Stage and Preliminary Plat. (11) PUD Cancellation A PUD shall only be cancelled and revoked upon the City Council adopting an ordinance rescinding the ordinance approving the PUD. Cancellation of a PUD shall include findings that demonstrate that the PUD is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan or other application land use regulations, threatens public safety, health, or welfare, or other applicable findings in accordance with law. (12) Administration In general, the following rules shall apply to all PUDs: (a) Rules and regulations: No requirement outlined in the PUD process shall restrict the City Council from taking action on an application if necessary to meet state mandated time deadlines; (b) Preconstruction: No building permit shall be granted for any building on land for which a PUD plan is in the process of review, unless the proposed building is allowed under the existing zoning and will not impact, influence, or interfere with the proposed PUD plan. (c) Effect on Conveved Propertv: In the event any real property in the approved PUD Agreement is conveyed in total, or in part, the buyers thereof shall be bound by the provisions of the approved Final PUD Plan constituting a part thereof as well as the PUD zoning ordinance; provided, however, that nothing herein shall be construed to create non -conforming lots, building sites, buildings or uses by virtue of any such conveyance of a lot, building site, building or part of the development created pursuant to and in conformance with the approved PUD. Page 74 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance CHAPTER 4: FINISHING STANDARDS Section 4.11 Building Materials Subsection (C) Residential District Requirements (2) New materials In recognition of the ever-changing marketplace for new finishing materials, the Community Development Department may authorize the use of materials not listed herein if it is determined that such a material is substantially similar or superior to one or more of the approved building materials. (C) Residential District Requirements (1) All Residence Districts No metal siding shall be permitted wider than 12 inches or without a one-half (1/2) inch or more overlap and relief. (2) R-1 and R-2 Districts A minimum of 15% of the front building fagade of any structure in the R-1 or R-2 Districts, less the square footage area of the garage doors, shall be covered with brick or stone. Any attached or major detached accessory building that can be seen from the street shall meet this same standard. Structures with front facades covered by at least 70% stucco or real wood may reduce the brick or stone coverage to 5%. The Community Development Department may approve optional facade treatments when additional architectural detailing so warrants. Such detailing may include usable front porches, extraordinary roof pitch or other features. (3) R -A and T -N Districts A minimum of 20% of the front building fagade of any structure in the R -A or T- N zoning district, less the square footage area of the garage doors, shall be covered with brick or stone. Any attached or major detached accessory building that can be seen from the street shall meet this same standard. Structures with front facades covered by at least 70% stucco or real wood may reduce the brick or stone coverage to 10%. (4) R-3 District and other Districts with Multiple Family Housing A R-3 District and other districts with multiple family housing shall be subject to building material standards as follows: all building walls facing a public street shall be covered with stone, brick, cultured masonry simulating brick or stone, or other enhanced materials acceptable to the City Council to an extent not less than 20% of the exposed wall silhouette area. In addition, multiple family structures of thirteen (13) or more units shall, when lap horizontal siding, be constructed of heavy gauge steel or cement -board, with no use of vinyl or aluminum permitted. City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 301 CHAPTER 4: FINISHING STANDARDS Section 4.11 Building Materials Subsection (D) Business District Requirements Natural wood or species that is resistant to decay may be permitted where approved by the City Council. (D) Business District Requirements In all Business Zoning Districts (see table 3-1), the following building materials standards shall apply. (1) No galvanized or unfinished steel, galvalum, or unfinished aluminum buildings, except those specifically designed to have a corrosive designed finish such as"corten" steel, shall be permitted in the districts listed herein. (2) Buildings in these zoning districts shall maintain a high standard of architectural and aesthetic compatibility with conforming surrounding properties to ensure that they will not adversely impact the property values of the abutting properties and shall have a positive impact on the public health, safety, and general welfare, insofar as practicable. (3) Exterior building finishes in the districts subject to this Section shall consist of materials compatible in grade and quality to the following: (a) Brick (b) Natural Stone (c) Decorative rock face or concrete block (d) Cast -in-place concrete or pre -cast concrete panels (e) Wood, provided that the surfaces are finished for exterior use and wood of proven exterior durability is used, such as cedar, redwood, or cypress (f) Glass (g) Exterior Insulated Finish systems, where said system is manufactured to replicate the look of one of the approved building materials in this section (h) Stucco (4) Metal exterior finishes shall be permitted only where coordinated into the overall architectural design of the structure, such as in window and door frames, mansard roofs or parapets, and other similar features, and in no case shall constitute more than 15% of the total exterior finish of the building. Page 302 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance CHAPTER 4: FINISHING STANDARDS Section 4.11 Building Materials Subsection (E) Industrial Requirements (5) Building Materials and Design for the CCD District: All buildings within the CCD shall meet the materials and design standards of the Comprehensive Plan as defined by the report "Embracing Downtown Monticello," Appendix B, Design Guidelines, as well as the standards in Section 4.11 of this ordinance. (E) Industrial Requirements (1) In the Industrial and Business Campus District (IBC), the following building materials and standards shall apply: (a) Buildings shall maintain a high standard of architectural and aesthetic compatibility with conforming surrounding properties to ensure that they will not adversely impact the property values of the abutting properties and shall have a positive impact on the public health, safety, and general welfare, insofar as practicable. (b) Exterior building finishes shall not consist of galvanized or unfinished steel, or unfinished aluminum. (c) Exterior building finishes shall consist of materials compatible in grade and quality to the following: (i) Brick; (ii) Natural Stone; (iii) Decorative rock face block or burnished block; (iv) Wood, provided that the surfaces are finished for exterior use and wood of proven exterior durability is used, such as cedar, redwood, or cypress (v) Glass; (vi) Stucco or substantially similar finish product; (vii) Exterior Insulated Finish systems, where said system is manufactured to replicate the look of one of the approved building materials in this section. (d) Metal exterior finishes shall be permitted only where coordinated into the overall architectural design of the structure, such as in window and door frames, mansard roofs or parapets, and other similar features, and in no case shall constitute more than 15% of the total exterior finish of the building. (2) In the Light Industrial District (1-1), the following building material standards shall apply: City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 303 CHAPTERS: USE STANDARDS Section 5.1 Use Table Subsection (A) Explanation of Use Table Structure Additional ConditionallyRequirements Permitted• "I" = Interim Permitted ol Residential Uses 5.2(C)(1) Attached Dwelling Types 5.2(C)(2)(a) - Duplex p C 9 5.2(C)(2)(b) p 5.2(C)(2)(c) - Townhouse C P C C 5.2(C)(2)(d) - Multiple -Family C P P None Detached Dwelling P P P P Group Residential P P P P Facility, Single Family P 5.2(C)(3) Group Residential C Facility, Multi -Family C C 5.2(C)(3) Mobile & Manufactured C Home / Home Park C C P C 5.2(C)(4) Civic & Institutional Uses Active Park Facilities p P p p p p p P (public) P p p P P P P None Active Park Facilities P P P P P P P (private) 5.2(D)(1) Assisted Living Facilities C P CC P 5.2(D)(2) Cemeteries C C C C C C C C 5.2(D)(3) None Clinics/Medical Services C P P Essential Services P P P P P P P P P P P P P C P P None 5.2(D)(4) Hospitals C P P C C C C C C C Nursing/Convalescent C Home C P P 5.2(D)(5) Passenger Terminal C C C C None Passive Parks and Open p Space P p P PP P P P p p p p p p None Place of Public Assembly CC C C C p C 5.2(D)(6) Public Buildings or Uses C C C C C C P C C P P C P P 5.2(D)(7) C Schools, K-12 C C C C C C I I 5.2(D)(8) Schools, Higher Education C None Utilities (major) C C C1 5.2(D)(9) Office Uses Offices P P P P P P P 5.2(El City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 325 CHAPTERS: USE STANDARDS Section S.2 Use -Specific Standards Subsection (D) Regulations for Civic and Institutional Uses (vii) Lighting: 1. Artificial light shall be maintained during all hours of darkness in all buildings containing public toilets, laundry equipment, and the like. 2. The manufactured home park ground shall be lighted as approved by the City from sunset to sunrise. (D) Regulations for Civic and Institutional Uses (1) Active Park Facilities — Private Private park facilities must be operated only for the enjoyment and convenience of the associated residents and their guests. (2) Assisted Living Facilities (a) The development must be contained on an independent parcel; 30% of the parcel must be preserved as open space at least 2/3rds of which shall be useable. (b) To continue to qualify for the senior citizen housing classification, the owner or agent shall annually file with the Community Development Department a certified copy of a monthly resume of occupants of such a multiple dwelling, listing the number of tenants by age. (c) One (1) off-street loading space shall be provided in compliance with Section 4.9, Off -Street Loading Spaces. (d) Elevator service shall be provided to each floor level which contains senior housing units. (e) The site of the main entrance of the principal use is served or is located within four hundred (400) feet of regular transit service. (f) Efficiency units shall be a minimum floor area of 440 square feet, and shall not exceed twenty (20) percent of the total number of apartments in a multiple dwelling. (g) One bedroom units shall be a minimum floor area of 520 square feet. (3) Cemeteries (a) New cemeteries shall be located on a site or parcel with an area of at least 2.5 acres. Page 338 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance CHAPTERS: USE STANDARDS Section S.2 Use -Specific Standards Subsection (D) Regulations for Civic and Institutional Uses (b) New cemeteries shall be located on a site or parcel that fronts an arterial or collector street. (c) Cemeteries shall include adequate space for the parking and maneuvering of funeral processions. (d) Interments shall take place at least 50 feet from any lot line. (e) Cemeteries shall not be located within one-half mile of Interstate Highway 94. (4) Hospitals A hospital shall: (a) Be located on a site of at least five acres. (b) Be located on a parcel that fronts or has direct access to an arterial or collector street. (c) Be served by public water and wastewater systems. (5) Nursing or Convalescent Home (a) Side yards shall be double the minimum requirements established for the applicable district. (b) When abutting a residential use in a residential use district, the property shall be screened with an aesthetic buffer (Table 4-2, Buffer Type `B") in accordance with section 4.1(G) of this ordinance. (c) One (1) off-street loading space in compliance with Section 4.8 of this ordinance is installed. (6) Places of Public Assembly (a) Institutions on parcels exceeding 20,000 square feet in area shall be located with direct frontage on, and access to, a collector or arterial street. (b) The buildings are set back from adjoining residential districts a distance no less than double the adjoining residential setback. (c) When abutting a residential use in a residential use district, the property shall be screened with an aesthetic buffer (Table 4-2, Buffer Type "B") in accordance with section 4.1(G) of this ordinance. City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 339 City Council Agenda 03/26/18 2J. Consideration of authorizing advertisement of bids to relocate FiberNet facilities for the Fallon Avenue Overpass vroiect (JO/SB) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND City Council is asked to consider authorizing advertisement of bids to relocate FiberNet facilities for the upcoming Fallon Avenue Overpass project. FiberNet facilities, consisting of an existing LCP cabinet and vault are located in the center of the proposed roundabout's center island and driving lanes at the intersections of Chelsea Road and Fallon Avenue and 7th Street and Washington Street. As a result, relocation of these facilities including associated pedestals, handholes, fiber lines, etc. is required for the construction of the Fallon Avenue Overpass project. The facilities will be relocated closer to the right of way lines in the green areas as depicted on the attached drawings. Originally, Arvig projected the construction costs at less than $100,000 however, based on preliminary quotes obtained by Arvig, it now looks like the project will exceed $100,000. Since the estimate is over $100,000, sealed bids are required to be solicited by public advertising per municipal bidding laws. It is anticipated to bid the project in April and ideally have the relocation complete by June prior to the Fallon Avenue Overpass project construction commencing. Al. Budget Impact: Arvig is estimating the construction cost for the relocation to be between $110,000 and $160,000. This does not include $22,724 for the Calix equipment for PON that the City will need to purchase as recommended by Arvig for the electronics component of the system. Per Arvig, their soft costs for "a technician to install the PON equipment is estimated at $2,800. The cost to the project for Outside Plant and Combo Technician(s) is estimated at $17,000.00. This includes continuation of service to current customers, checking in at the project, locating, tending to the exposed fiber, cutting over and overall safeguarding of FiberNet plant. Arvig engineering, inspection, and planning is estimated at $4,020.00." Arvig's costs total $23,820. City engineer and WSB time to develop project specifications in coordination with Arvig, bid documents, bid tabulation and project management for the bid process is estimated at $3,500. Advertising costs are estimated at $500. The total project cost is estimated between $160,000 and $210,000 and will be funded by Liquor Funds. A2. Staff Workload Impact: Engineering and FiberNet staff will develop the bid documents and manage the bid process. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS 1. Motion to authorize advertisement of bids to relocate FiberNet facilities for the Fallon Avenue Overpass project. 2. Motion to deny at this time. City Council Agenda 03/26/18 C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends Alternate No. 1. D. SUPPORTING DATA • Draft FiberNet relocation plans 3/21/18 SEE SHEET 2 Fallon Ave —J � I W _7 \ 0 50 FT 100 FT ■ --- \ - - 1 2,0t 12-- -------- F ' 2b5 2b6 � -SORE NEW FF Imo__ - 12�A ,------- - - --- -- "---- - - - - - - - 21210 d� Og 1 f _ 1- 0 --= J © 2Im — -DI G UP AND SPLICE 8 — BORE NEW FIBER S so 21 2— q 2 - ET HHH \ - / FIBER DRO Ir � � I ��0' o F ;•� FIBER DROP LEGEND FLOWER POT _ I QI -----• CONSTRUCTION LIMITS J_____= I RIGHT OF WAY DIG BACK EXISTING FIBER Lu AND SWING INTO NEW VAULT D&U EASEMENT co I'll W BORE NEW FIBER TEMPORARY EASEMENT -F/0 -81JR- EXISTING FTBFRNET FIBER OPTIC U' I II II -F10 -BLIR- PROPOSED FIBERNET FIBER OPTIC SEE SHEET 2 Q D O V O Q N O m C l m d O O Q Q ,C l 3 O V O R Q t0 Ory O� �Y W NO. DATE BY CHK REVISIONS Design By: SHEET CITY OF MONTICELLO, MN ry Plan By: CITY OF FIBERNET RELOCATION PLANS 1 Monticello OF Checked By: 4 BRETT CHRISTIANSEN, ARVIG Approved By: CITY OF MONTICELLO O � DATE. C.P.16C006 SHEETS SEE SHEET 1 \U II � II \I 0I 10 I 1 II 1 I i1 BORE NEW FIBER Ij UR DIG UP EXISTING DUCT T �F/0-BUR 'AFI i -BLOW THRU EXISTING DUCT 410'8' ---3b6 3 A '3 W CD a 0 U O Q N O m C l m d O O Q Q ,C l 3 O V O � Q Q t0 Ory O� �Y m� N= NO. DATE BY CHK REVISIONS W rn ox Hti O� Chelsea Rd I/ I 1 O u- 1 I SEE SHEET 1 S"t W� CD FIBER DROP U SET HH DIG UP FIBER AND SWING INTO NEW HH-Wmi; 1101i R ---- t - Jk F/0 -BURF 0 -BUR v-- 0' 1311 I_312 J BORE NEWSf�BER� - ---- - ------ 3- - - -- - o ' `FLOWER POT - N11 `i-IBER DOOP 3/21/18 0 50 FT 100 FT LEGEND -- -- -- CONSTRUCTION LIMITS — — — — — RIGHT OF WAY ------ D&U EASEMENT TEMPORARY EASEMENT —F/0 -BUR— EXISTING FIBERNET FIBER OPTIC —F/0 -BUR— PROPOSED FIBERNET FIBER OPTIC Design By: SHEET Plan By: CITY OF 1 P FIBERNET RELOCATION PLANS CITY OF MONTICELLO, MN 2 Checked By: 1Zlim.MOntice �o OF BRETT CHRISTIANSEN, ARVIG CITY OF MONTICELLO 4 Approved By: DATE.HEETS C.P.CP16C006 —F/0 -BUR N1 C O Q O O Q N O m C l m d O O Q Q ,C l 3 O V O R Q t0 Ory O� �Y m� N= NO. DATE BY CHK REVISIONS W 1n ox Hti O� SEE SHEET 4 / jz 11104 1105 1 �2-------- - - 1 b3---- _J lb4 165 4/0 -BUR-_ _—F/0-BURF/n -Alm BL]W THRU EXISTING DUCT -1 - ♦ UIG UP EXISTING DUCT\ \ BORE NEW FIBER I Al � I I - I SET LCP CABINET \ CEO ♦ I ♦ ♦ � I BLOW THRU DUCT I lam' I (PLACED WITH 1 I OADWAY PROJECTII I ? I ♦♦ � 1 n ♦♦ ♦ II g ? 7th St �3 'N� Z /) ORE 1108 a BIG INI BO -RE NEW FIRE \ 1 << 44 `` 9 Ia I� EXISTING PED y i r � 0 50 FT 100 FT LEGEND - - - -- - CONSTRUCTION LIMITS RIGHT OF WAY ------ D&U EASEMENT TEMPORARY EASEMENT t0 -BUR- EXISTING FIBERNET FIBER OPTIC -F/0-BUR- PROPOSED FIBERNET FIBER OPTIC 3/21/18 Design By: SHEET Plan By: CITY OF 1 P FIBERNET RELOCATION PLANS CITY OF MONTICELLO, MN 3 Checked By: 1Zlim.MOntice �o OF BRETT CHRISTIANSEN, ARVIG CITY OF MONTICELLO 4 Approved By: DATE.HEETS C.P.CP16C006 DIG UP EXISTING DUCT ORE NEW FIBER—, , \ SET LCP CABINET SEE SHEET 3 ' a3l U o / \ PLACE IN 3 CONDUIT 1 \� -BUR CfL; UR_ J -/-0=$URJ�L__�`/-0�BUR/ �F/0 -BF/0 -BUR Fi0 -SUR F/0 -B e I -- -__ - 1 / IBORE NEW FIBER � „BORE NEW F� I- SEE SHEET 3 Washington St 1 / 1 I I , I I 1 — —' \mss------ ----I 1 4,01 1 -------------- 4 -- 144b022 - - -- -------4 b4 I-------- ------------- -- - -- - 463/ J'------- — -QU R� ---- UIG UP EXISTING DUCT\ I \ XISTING VAULT I ~6LOW TNRUTING DUCT 7 ORE NEW FIBER I � i 1 1 i 3/21/18 0 50 FT 100 FT LEGEND — — — — -- CONSTRUCTION LIMITS — — — — — RIGHT OF WAY ------ D&U EASEMENT TEMPORARY EASEMENT —F/0 -BUR— EXISTING FIBERNET FIBER OPTIC —F/0 -BUR— PROPOSED FIBERNET FIBER OPTIC Design By: SHEET Plan By: CITY OF 1 P FIBERNET RELOCATION PLANS CITY OF MONTICELLO, MN 4 Checked By: 1Zlim.Montice �o OF BRETT CHRISTIANSEN, ARVIG CITY OF MONTICELLO 4 Approved By: DATE.HEETS C.P.CP16C006 City Council Agenda 03/26/2018 2K. Consideration of approving participation in a City/County traffic studv for Briarwood Avenue NE as related to the Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park in the amount of $5,381. (AS/TM/TP) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The City Council is asked to approve an expenditure of $5,381 as the City's contribution to a traffic analysis for Briarwood Avenue NE, which provides primary access to the Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park and Athletic Park. As part of the approval of the Land Alteration Permit for the Phase 1 improvements at the BCOL Athletic Park, Monticello Township requested that the City and County work with the Township to develop an agreement on necessary road improvements and maintenance resulting from vehicles using Briarwood Avenue to access Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park. This requirement was added as a condition of the Land Alteration Permit by the Wright County Planning Commission in its approval. At its December 20th, 2017 Transportation Committee meeting (Committee of the Whole), the Wright County Board of Commissioners discussed developing a partnership between the City, County and Township in support of future road improvements and maintenance as a result of park use traffic. The Transportation Committee authorized the Wright County Highway Engineering Department to solicit proposals for a traffic analysis to establish base traffic counts and then provide information and analysis on future traffic increases and maintenance impacts related to increased use of Briarwood Avenue NE for the park. City staff were given the opportunity to comment on the proposal scope. The Wright County Highway Engineer's Office requested proposals for the study and received three in response. At the March 14th, 2018 meeting of the Wright County Transportation Committee (Committee of the Whole), the Commissioners approved the proposal by WSB & Associates, which is in a not to exceed amount of $10,762. It is intended that the study outcomes will be used to develop a partnership between the City of Monticello, Wright County and Monticello Township for Briarwood Avenue road maintenance. Al. Budget Impact: The budget impact is $5,381 and is a not to exceed amount. The County will fund the balance and will provide the majority of staff support for the administration of the contract and project. Funding is proposed to come from the Park and Pathway Fund. A2. Staff Workload Impact: City staff, including the Street and Parks Superintendents, as well as Community Development, will support Wright County's efforts on an as -needed basis. The estimated staff time for the project is 6-9 hours. Additional staff time and decisions may be required as a result of the study. A3. Strategic Plan Impact: Strategic Goals: City Council Agenda 03/26/2018 • Create & Preserve Sustainable Livability: Partnership in the study will support the City's interests in the development of BCOL Athletic Park. Be a Regional Leader: The City will be partnering with Wright County on this project. In doing so, the City will be strengthening a relationship for future improvements needed along Briarwood. Working with Wright County and Monticello Township on the project may yield other funding opportunities for the road improvements, such as a grant through the State Park Road Account and the potential for a future shared cost maintenance agreement. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve participation in a City/County traffic study for Briarwood Avenue NE as related to the Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park in the amount of $5,381. 2. Motion to deny participation in a City/County traffic study for Briarwood Avenue NE as related to the Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park in the amount of $5,381. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends Alternative 1. The study is the first step in understanding existing traffic levels, as well as future demand and impact, on Briarwood Avenue NE. The study will provide information by which the City, County and Township can develop a common understanding and agreement on any future road improvements and maintenance. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Request for Proposal B. Proposal by WSB & Associates C. Transportation Committee Meeting Minutes, December 20th 2017 JN7 Y c Z � Z 0 OF January 29, 2018 O d� -4y less Shibani Bisson, P.E. Wright County WSB & Associates, Inc. Highway Department 701 Xenia Avenue So, #300 3600 Braddock Ave NE Minneapolis, MN 55416 Buffalo, MN 55313 Ph: (763)682-7383 Subject: Request for proposal for Professional Services Fax: (763)682-7313 Briarwood Ave NE Traffic Study, Monticello Township VIRGIL HAWKINS, P.E. Dear Shibani: Highway Engineer CHAD HAUSMANN, P.E. The Wright County Highway Department is seeking proposals from qualified Assistant Highway Engr. consultants for engineering services associated with the above mentioned project. STEVE MEYER Maintenance In order to be considered for this project, we must receive your proposal no later Superintendent than 3:00 p.m. on Friday, February 16, 2018. JEREMY CARLSON, P.L.S. Right -of -Way Agent Background: SARA BUERMANN, P.E. Wright County is requesting a traffic impact study to determine impacts to Traffic Engineer Briarwood Avenue NE due to an increase in traffic generated by the recent and proposed development of the Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park. Scope of Services: I. Analyze County provided traffic counts and turning movement counts at the following intersections: • Park Entrances o Athletic Park Parking -10224 Briarwood Ave NE o Beach Parking — 9910 Briarwood Ave NE o Trailhead Parking —1744 90th St NE o YMCA Pool and Splash Pad and YMCA Camp Parking lot entrance Analyze County provided traffic counts along the following corridors: • Briarwood Ave NE • 901h Street NE • Cahill Ave NE The County will provide both peak season (July 2018) and off peak season (April 2018) traffic counts. 2. Assume that the off peak season traffic counts represent non park use traffic. 3. Estimate the number of trips that will be generated by full build out of the proposed regional park development using the current ITE trip generation rates and/or data provided by development team. Determine an estimate of a split of these trips between the City Athletic Park, Wright County Park, the YMCA and Camp Manitou. An Equal Opportunity Employer 4. Distribute the trips generated by the proposed development to the adjacent roadway network from the north and from the south. 5. Determine current pavement conditions, years of life remaining and estimate an accelerated pavement degradation based on the additional trips generated. 6. Review the proposed site access points to determine turn lanes and/or bypass lanes needed. 7. Prepare a draft memorandum documenting the findings and recommendations. Make revisions as appropriate based on County, City and Township review and prepare a final memorandum. 8. Prepare for and attend up to two meetings at the request of County Highway staff. Assume that one of these meetings is a public meeting. 9. Provide day-to-day project management, administration, and QA/QC, as well as project coordination with County Highway staff. Assumptions Utilize all available data that have been developed for other studies within the area. Please contact Chad Hausmann, Assistant County Engineer, or Sara Buermann, Traffic Engineer, if you have any questions regarding this proposal. Sincerely, Virgil G. Hawkins, P. . County Highway Engineer Enclosure Location map Park layout Cc: Chad Hausmann, Assistant County Engineer Sara Buermann, Traffic Engineer Angela Schumenn, City of Monticello Marc Mattice, Wright County Parks Director Monticello Township County Commissioners icello 1,7 'IT WAR Jbw F BrIarwood Ave NE Traffic Study I BERTRAM r.u•iu OFA�++ J ARK 1 •i \ ,,Dijlm,�39M ,P, t NDN STgITrf r �W Reywil an site Le end 0 Park Entrances I Parking Lots j © Interim Athletic Park J + Q Public Swimming Beach 0 YMCA Day Camp Manitou d Picnic Shelters wa tomw 0 Natural Theme Playground Q Bertram Lake Chalet i..w .ten Q Amphitheater wato t) eQ Fishing Piers yr Canoe/Kayak Launch Hiking Trails Mountain Bike Trails YMCA Pool & Splash Park ® YMCA High Ropes & Zip Line jw,A WSB — 701 Xenia Avenue South I Suite 300 1 Minneapolis, MN 55416 1 (763) 541-4800 February 16, 2018 Mr. Virgil Hawkins PE County Highway Engineer Wright County Highway Department 3600 Braddock Avenue NE Buffalo, MN 55313 Re: Proposal to Provide Engineering Services Briarwood Avenue NE Traffic Study Monticello Township, Wright County Dear Mr. Hawkins: WSB & Associates, Inc. is pleased to respond to the Wright County Request for Proposal regarding the preparation of a Traffic Study for Briarwood Avenue NE in conjunction with the development of Bertram Chain of Lakes (BCOL) Regional Park Athletic Complex site. The project is located south of CSAH 39 and northwest of TH 25 in Monticello Township. We understand that the study will serve to provide documentation of the impacts and transportation needs on the surrounding transportation network. Our knowledgeable project team will provide Wright County with the capabilities necessary to complete all the requirements of the Traffic Study in a professional, timely, and cost-effective manner. Our extensive traffic engineering and planning experience will lead to a technically sound evaluation that will identify the best solutions to meet the future needs in the area. We have selected staff specifically for this project that are qualified for this work, and who have previously worked on transportation projects in the area. Our highly skilled project team will be led by Charles Rickart, PE, PTOE, a Principal and Senior Project Manager with WSB. He will serve as Project Manager and direct the work for the Briarwood Avenue Traffic Study. He has more than 34 years of experience in transportation and traffic engineering, working on similar traffic study projects for communities throughout the region. Most recently, Chuck has provided traffic engineering services for the Cities of Monticello, Edina, Bloomington, Shakopee, Medina, and Champlin. He also assisted the City of Monticello by providing review and analysis of the initial traffic impacts to the area roadways during the preparation of the BCOL Feasibility Study for developing a long-range master plan for the site. Building a legacy —your legacy. Equal Opportunity Employer I wsbeng.com As you will see in the following pages of our proposal, WSB has assembled an experienced traffic engineering team that is committed to providing the same high-level service and professional expertise that we have provide to the County on past projects and studies. We are enthusiastic about this opportunity to continue our relationship with Wright County, and to provide quality services that are consistent with your expectations and WSB's reputation. If you have any questions regarding our proposal, please contact us at 763-541-4800. Sincerely, WSB & Associates, Inc. V7v� Charles Rickart, PE, PTOE Principal/Project Manager Building a legacy — your legacy. Equal Opportunity Employer I wsbeng.com Project Understanding /Approach Project Purpose The purpose of this study will be to determine the traffic impacts the proposed BCOL Regional Park Athletic Complex site, including the adjacent existing uses, will have on the area roadways and intersections/driveway. As well as identifying a mitigation plan which addresses any identified impacts. Based on the number of facilities and the parking capacity, it is expected at a minimum, Briarwood Avenue may need to be improved to accommodate the expected traffic generation from the facilities. The Traffic Study will determine the likely growth in traffic due to proposed BCOL development, as well as traffic generated from existing adjacent uses and general traffic growth from development outside the area. The Study will determine how this growth will impact the in-place and planned infrastructure adjacent to the BCOL site. The analysis will entail a detailed look at the impacts for the existing and future conditions. It is anticipated that the BCOL site will be developed in phases based on need and funding. With input from the County and the BCOL Advisory Council, it is proposed that analysis of two interim years and the full build (2040) will be completed. This will provide documentation on when specific improvements may be required to accommodate the site development as it occurs. Studv Area The project area includes the corridor from CSAH 39 along Briarwood Avenue NE, 901h Street NE and Cahill Avenue NE ending at CR 106 (85th Street) in Monticello Township. Wright County has identified the following key driveways/intersections for traffic operations analysis. 1. Athletic Park Parking Entrance 2. Beach Parking Entrance 3. Trailhead Parking Entrance 4. YMCA Pool and Splash Pad and YMCA Camp Parking Lot Entrance Approach WSB will utilize a traditional approach in completing the Traffic Study. However, the way we develop and document the information at each step of the process is unique. By use of spreadsheets and planning models, we make certain it is correct, that it can be easily reproduced, and that it can be adjusted easily to evaluate other scenarios. Each step will be well documented in order to facilitate County and agency review. This approach includes the following steps: • Document existing conditions (i.e. lanes, volumes, level of service and pavement condition) on study area roadways and intersections/driveways. • Forecast future background traffic levels on study area roadways for forecast years • Determine trip generation for each anticipated phase of the proposed BCOL Master Plan. • Determine distribution of the development area generated trips • Assign development area trips to the adjacent roadway network • Conduct operations analysis of key study area driveways and intersections for forecast background conditions (no -build), as well as for proposed development (build) • Identify potential improvements or mitigation measures Building a legacy — your legacy. Equal Opportunity Employer I wsbeng.com WSB will work closely with the impacted agency's including Wright County, the City of Monticello, Monticello Township and the BCOL Advisory Council throughout the study to get input on study assumptions and potential recommended improvements. Our approach to each of these steps is discussed in more detail below in the scope of work section. Scope of Work Based on our understanding of the County's needs, our knowledge of the project area and our previous experience with projects of this type, we have developed a scope of work to complete the Briarwood Avenue NE Traffic Study. Task 1— Data Collection/Review Developing a good base of information on the roadway network in the study area is important to developing a study and forecasts that are accurate. This task will include collecting the data required for the analysis and evaluation of traffic impacts. Information that will be collected and verified includes but is not limited to: • Existing traffic volumes provided by Wright County for peak season (July) and off-peak season (April) on the area roadways and at the key intersections/driveways. • Roadway characteristics, including number of lanes, existing traffic control, and speeds. • As -built plans for the area roadways. • Crash data on area roadways and at the key intersections/driveways. • Current development plans for the BCOL site Master Plan including the anticipated development phasing. • Recent traffic studies conducted by the City and/or Wright County. Task 2 — Pavement Condition The current pavement in the study corridor is approximately 10 years old. In order to determine the existing pavement condition WSB will conduct a visual inspection of pavement. Our pavement experts will than estimate the remaining life of the pavement under current traffic conditions and determine what the life of the pavement would be with the anticipated traffic growth from the proposed BCOL site development. These results will be used in determining the final recommendations for improvement to the area roadways. Task 3 — Trip Generation and Distribution Trip generation and distribution will be completed for the BCOL site for existing, two interim years and full build (2040) conditions. Trip generation and distribution will be completed for traffic generated on a daily basis, as well as traffic generated in the AM and PM peak hours using standard methodologies and rates identified in the ITE Trip Generation Manual (10th Edition). Trip distribution including the split of traffic within the BCOL site between the City Athletic Park, County Park, YMCA and Camp Manitou, will be based on existing traffic patterns and input from Wright County and the BCOL Advisory Council. Building a legacy — your legacy. Equal Opportunity Employer I wsbeng.com Task 4 — Traffic Forecasts Traffic forecasts will be prepared for the existing, two interim years and full build (2040) conditions. The forecasts will be developed by estimating the growth of background traffic and adding the traffic that would be generated from the proposed BCOL site including phasing. Forecasting background traffic will be important in determining roadway improvement needs within the study area and how much of the needs are related to the BCOL site development. In order to estimate the growth in background traffic, WSB will review the historical traffic growth on study area roadways The off-peak season count (April) will represent the non -park use traffic on the area roadways. Subtracting that volume from the peak season count (July) will determine the existing site utilization. The existing intersection counts would be adjusted to reflect the estimated growth in background traffic so that a no -build forecast is available for each of the forecast years. The new BCOL development site traffic including phasing would then be added to the no -build traffic in order to determine the build traffic conditions for each of the forecasted years. Task 5 — Traffic Analysis This task will include the completion of the operational analysis of existing and future traffic volumes for the AM and PM peak hour at the identified critical intersections and driveways that are directly impacted by the proposed BCOL site development. WSB will utilize Synchro/SimTraffic for the traffic operations analysis. SimTraffic provides a simulation of the traffic operations that can be used to help the public and policy makers understand where operational issues may occur and to help identify potential improvements that could mitigate any problems. The analysis would include existing, two interim years and full build (2040) for the AM and PM peak hour operations for both the build and no -build conditions. The results of the operations analysis will be used to identify potential mitigation improvements. The mitigation plan would include such items as changing the traffic control, providing turn lanes or bypass lanes. Mitigation will be identified for existing, two interim years and full build (2040) conditions. Task 6 — Traffic Study Report A report will be prepared documenting the study methodology and analysis from the above tasks including recommended intersection/driveway or roadway improvements. A draft report will be prepared and submitted to County staff for review, comments will be addressed, and a final report will be prepared and reviewed with County staff and other agencies as required. Task 7 — Meetings and Presentations WSB will be available to attend meetings that are necessary to discuss or present the Traffic Study. It is assumed that two meeting will be held as part of the project. The first meeting will be with County staff to discuss the preliminary findings of the study. The second meeting will be a public open house to present the finding of the study and receive input on the recommended improvements. In addition, the impacts and results will be reviewed with the City of Monticello and the BCOL Advisory Council if needed. Building a legacy — your legacy. Equal Opportunity Employer I wsbeng.com Key Personnel WSB is well-qualified to provide these services to the Wright County. We approach every project by selecting specific team members who have demonstrated their expertise on similar projects and who are familiar with issues in the study area. The following team has routinely prepared and/ or reviewed traffic studies for communities throughout Minnesota including the Cities of Monticello, Edina, Minnetonka, Baxter and Rosemount. Discussed below are the key WSB team members with a brief discussion of their qualifications and role for the Briarwood Avenue NE Traffic Study. Charles Rickart, PE, PTOE — Project Manager Chuck will serve as the Project Manager for this study. He will be responsible for coordinating the work within the WSB team, as well as the quality control, staff scheduling, and overall project management to ensure that the project meets a high-quality standard, is delivered on time, and within budget. Chuck will serve as the primary contact for communication with County staff and will provide overall project direction and leadership for the WSB project team. Chuck is a Senior Project Manager in WSB's Transportation Engineering Group. He is a registered Professional Engineer, as well as a registered Professional Traffic Operations Engineer with more than 34 years of experience in traffic and transportation engineering. His exceptional depth of engineering knowledge assures clients they get the right answers to their issues. Chuck's experience has included numerous traffic impact studies, traffic forecasting, signing and pavement marking plans, development plan reviews, pedestrian studies, and neighborhood traffic calming studies. Most recently, he has provided traffic engineering services for the Cities of Monticello, Edina, Bloomington, Shakopee, Medina, and Champlin. Erik Seiberlich — Traffic Lead Erik is a Project Manager at WSB with more than 16 years of experience delivering and managing traffic engineering and ITS projects. He is an expert in the areas of traffic signal and intersection design, signing, striping, roadway lighting, and traffic operations, including traffic impact analysis and traffic simulation models. Erik also has experience with ITS planning and design. Some examples of Erik's similar experience include traffic elements of the CSAH 12 Corridor Improvements project in Stillwater, Blake Road Corridor Study in Hopkins, West Meadows Traffic Impact Study in Rochester, and the Central Entrance and 6th Avenue East Corridor Studies in Duluth. Other projects include the forecasting and analysis elements of the North Mandan Subarea Study for the Bismarck -Mandan MPO and the traffic element for several Alternative Urban Areawide Reviews (AUAR), Environmental Impact Statements (EIS) and the preliminary design stages for State and County highways. Mallori Fitzpatrick, EIT — Project Engineer Mallori will assist Eric and Chuck with the traffic analysis and preparation of the study. Mallori is a Graduate Engineer in WSB's Transportation Group. She has a wide range of traffic engineering experience, including sign data collection, highway striping inspection, signing and traffic control design. She also has experience in simulation modeling, traffic forecasting, writing Intersection Control Evaluation reports and traffic impact studies. Mallori's knowledge of computer-aided design programs includes MicroStation, Synchro/SimTraffic, RODEL, SignCAD, and VISSIM. Building a legacy — your legacy. Equal Opportunity Employer I wsbeng.com Andrea Blanchette, PE - Pavement Specialist Andrea is a graduate of the University of Minnesota, Institute of Technology, and completed graduate school for civil engineering with an emphasis on pavements and materials. Her Masters research described the effect of heavy agricultural equipment on the flexible and rigid pavements in rural roads in Minnesota, Wisconsin, and Iowa. Andrea joined WSB in 2011 and now manages the pavements and materials service area at WSB. She works on pavement management, pavement forensics, spec review, intelligent compaction efforts as well as education and outreach on pavements and materials. Her education, research, and experience working with pavement and materials is a valued addition to WSB's Construction Services Group, helping to expand an already recognized pavements and materials group. Mary Schwartz — Data Collection/CADD Technician Mary will be responsible for all the data collection and CADD needs. Mary is an Engineering Specialist in WSB's Transportation Group with more than 25 years of experience in field data collection, traffic engineering design, and traffic signal/lighting inspection. Her field data collection skills include coordination and collection of intersection turning movements, vehicle speeds, vehicle classification, parking, queuing studies, pedestrian studies, O -D studies, etc. Mary's design experience includes preparation of plans for traffic signal systems, lighting systems, work -zone traffic control, signing, and pavement markings. Cost The cost to provide the scope of services outlined in this proposal will be billed on an hourly basis, based on our current hourly rates (fee schedule attached). A proposed hourly breakdown of each task by employee class is located on the following page. We are proposing to complete the requested base study engineering services for a not -to -exceed cost of $10,762. A summary of the estimated cost by task for the base study is outlined below. Estimated Task Description Cost 1 Data Collection / Review $918 2 Pavement Condition $1,313 3 Trip Generation and Distribution $844 4 Traffic Forecasts $1,310 5 Traffic Analysis $2,984 6 Traffic Impact Study Report $1,608 7 Meetings $1,785 Total Study Cost $10,762 Building a legacy — your legacy. Equal Opportunity Employer I wsbeng.com Schedule WSB anticipates that the study will be completed within three weeks following notice to proceed and receipt of the traffic volume counts from the County. It is WSB's commitment that the Traffic Study will be completed on schedule, assuming all data is available from the County and there are no unforeseen delays. We will use effective project management techniques to maintain the time and deliverable commitments for this important study. Building a legacy — your legacy. Equal Opportunity Employer I wsbeng.com WORK PLAN and ESTIMATE of COST Briarwood Avenue NE Traffic Study Monticello Township, Wright County Minnesota Total Estimated Hours Principal/ Project Graduate Engr / Project Engineer / Engineering Engineering Clerical/Offic Total Task Manager Planner Specialist Tech e Tech Hours Cost Task No. Description 1 DATA COLLECTION / REVIEW 2 PAVEMENT CONDITION 3 TRIP GENERATION and DISTRIBUTION 4 TRAFFIC FORECASTS 5 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS 6 TRAFFIC STUDY REPORT 7 MEETINGS TOTAL PROJECT Hourly Costs Labor Costs 1 1 2 2 4 11 2 4 2 8 $ 918.00 6 2 1 10 $ 1,313.00 2 4 7 $ 844.00 4 6 11 $ 1,310.00 4 16 4 26 $ 2,984.00 2 6 2 2 14 $ 1,608.00 4 2 2 1 13 $ 1,785.00 24 38 12 4 $ 182.00 $ 135.00 $ 98.00 $ 128.00 $ 65.00 $ 2,002.00 $ 3,240.00 $ 3,724.00 $ 1,536.00 $ 260.00 89 $ 10,762.00 $ 10,762.00 TOTAL NOT TO EXCEED COST 1 1 $ 10,762.00 1 ■ WSB 2018 Rate Schedule Billing Rate/Hour Principal $163-$182 Associate / Sr. Project Manager / Sr. Project Engineer $147-$182 Project Manager $128-$142 Project Engineer $112-$142 Graduate Engineer $85-$105 Sr. Landscape Architect / Sr. Planner / Sr. GIS Specialist $115-$142 Landscape Architect / Planner / GIS Specialist $68-$107 Engineering Specialist / Sr. Environmental Scientist $97-$139 Engineering Technician / Environmental Scientist $56-$92 Construction Observer $92-$116 Pavement Coring Survey One -Person Crew $170 Two -Person Crew $255 One -Person Crew $140 Two -Person Crew $185 Three -Person Crew $198 Office Technician $50-$90 Costs associated with word processing, cell phones, reproduction of common correspondence, and mailing are included in the above hourly rates. Vehicle mileage is included in our billing rates [excluding geotechnical and construction materials testing (CMT) service rates]. Mileage can be charged separately, if specifically outlined by contract. Reimbursable expenses include costs associated with plan, specification, and report reproduction; permit fees; delivery costs; etc. Multiple rates illustrate the varying levels of experience within each category. Rate Schedule is adjusted annually. Building a legacy —your legacy. Equal Opportunity Employer I wsbeng.com WRIGHT COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE Meeting Minutes APPROVED December 20, 2017 at 1:00pm Wright County Highway Building 3600 Braddock Ave NE Room 134 A/B Members Attending: Virgil Hawkins, Highway Engineer Lee Kelly, County Coordinator Christine Husom, County Commissioner Darek Vetsch, County Commissioner Michael Potter, County Commissioner Mark Daleiden, County Commissioner Others Attending: Aaron Brom Jack Fulton Darlene Haus Lindsay Kvehn Kevin Yonaki Adam Nafstad, City of Albertville Lloyd Hilgart, City of Monticello Tom Moores, City of Monticello Angela Schumann, City of Monticello Bob Idziorek, Monticello Township 1. Introduction: Mark Daleiden opens meeting. Chad Hausmann, Assistant Highway Engineer Steve Meyer, Hwy. Maintenance Superintendent Brian Jans, Hwy. Maintenance Supervisor Jeremy Carlson, Wright County Right -of -Way Agent Kevin Johnson, Hwy. Senior Construction Technician Loren Green, Hwy. Dept. Administrative Assistant Marc Mattice, Wright County Parks Director Steve Bot, City of St Michael Tom Pawelk, City of Monticello Parks 2. 2018 Wright County Transportation Plan Update Virgil Hawkins gave an update. The Highway Dept. received proposals from two engineering firms. This is a long range plan that looks beyond our current S yr. plan. The county budgeted $100,000 in 2018. While it does exceed the county budget, we received financial commitments from St. Michael, Otsego and Albertville totaling $30,000. MnDOT may also contribute financially towards the plan but no solid commitment as of this date. The county staff reviewed the two proposals received, one with an estimated cost of $139,600 from SRF and the other for $169,000. Highway would like to hire SRF to do the plan. Hilgart asked why they wanted to go with SRF? Hawkins explained that not only were they the low bid, but they have done many similar projects for MnDOT and other local agencies RECOMMENDATION: It was the consensus that a recommendation be made to the Wright County Board of Commissioners to accept the proposal and hire SRF for this project. 3. Construction Projects Update (Highway 9, 38 and 18) 9: Chad Hausmann gave an update on said projects. Construction plans are being prepared by consulting engineer incorporating county roadway improvements with needed city utility upgrades. Approx. 75% complete. Acquisition of necessary easements (9 parcels) will begin in January 2018 with construction planned to begin in the spring. It is expected to take a full construction season to complete. Potter tells Hausmann that people are happy with this improvement but make sure it is done correctly. 38: Mark Daleiden asked about 38. Construction plans for 38 (from O'Dean to TH101) are being prepared and are approx. 75% complete. Offers have been presented to all property owners where easements are needed. Over % the involved properties have agreed to offers at this time. Construction is planned for May 2018 and estimated to be completed fall 2018. Daleiden asked Jeremy Carlson what notice he sent out to residents on 38. Carlson said survey work and boring notices were sent and that the project was upcoming. Potter says it will be a great project for that area as it will alleviate much congestion. Daleiden asked about a speed study being completed MnDOT on 38 by Martin Farms. Hausmann said they wanted to establish a speed limit there and MnDOT has completed the field work for the speed study on 38 (from 19 to TH101). There is a disagreement within MnDOT to make an official determination, which we are currently waiting on. 18: Preliminary plans are nearing completion. Revisions have been made to reduce the impacts/address concern of property owners. Final construction plans are expected to be completed within the next month. An appraiser will be hired shortly to determine the land acquisition values. Construction is planned for May 2018, but impacts and detours must wait until the school year is over in early June. The contract will require the roadway to reopen to traffic by the beginning of the new 2018-2019 school year. Daleiden asked if it will go into school time for sure? Hausmann said that depends on the soil borings — did new soil borings yesterday, we should be able to get the project done in the summer time frame. The road will be open for school regardless, and work may extend into 2019. Potter asked about the Haus property — how much were impacts reduced? Hausmann said it was reduced from 0.8 acres to about 0.3 acres. Vetsch asked if they are doing a roundabout on 18. Hausmann said yes. Hausmann said they are finishing study on roundabouts vs. a 4 way stop at the intersection of MacIver/Hwy.18 and Naber Ave/Hwy.18. Looking at crash rates, in comparison based on other roadways. Looking at volume and delay and if in the long term it can handle the traffic. Potter asked about future developments — how do they plan for handling the extra traffic? Hausmann said this is based on the future development proposals themselves, they will determine if there is a need to improve the highways to handle the extra traffic. Developers would then be responsible for any additional improvements. Daleiden asked if they are closing off an entrance to Big Woods Elementary? Hausmann said they are talking of potentially adding an entrance East of Naber—to give alternates. Potter asked if the St Michael fire chief has been made aware of alternate routes? Yes, he's been made aware. Hausmann stated that they are doing a traffic study which will let them know what they need to do for school access routes during construction. Daleiden opened the discussion for comments by attendees with any new business. Darlene Haus asked if there are any state or fed funds being used for the roundabouts? Hausmann said there are no state or federal funds being used by the county. The City may be using state funds for their share and says the plans will go thru MNDOT review. Haus asked, in reference to MacIver & 18, what is the critical crash rate at that intersection, adding that the numbers she has do not match up to what the county has given her. She indicated that the Sheriffs Dept. Crash map analysis tool showed zero accidents on the entire stretch and both intersections from May 2015 to the present and that the above average crash rate applies to half of all existing intersections in the county, and what really mattered was the critical crash rate. Hawkins said they look at current traffic volume and 20yr projected volumes. He said that adding a roundabout provides more safety and reduces crashes, especially severe crashes. Haus questioned the critical crash data and made mention of there being no need to add a roundabout. Haus stated that the traffic data she had from the Wright County Highway Department went back to 2006, showing no fatalities. Daleiden added that the ultimate goal is to reduce the potential for any type of accident, not just critical, and this would include looking ahead at future potential. Accompanying Haus is Jack Fulton who commented that the only real way to prevent critical crashes is to not drive. Haus then continued, stating that she "wanted to remind everyone that the farm is in Ag Preserve. And when a woman says N0, it means N0. It's a No take option." Haus continued and mentioned two vehicles that had trespassed on her property, one being an unidentified Wright County Surveyor vehicle and the other a truck (Glacial Ridge Drilling) who Haus stated told her Wright County Highway Dept informed them that the property was "a community owned garden and had permission to park there." Haus stated she called their (Glacial Ridge Drilling) dispatch to have the truck removed. Haus stated to the committee that she wouldn't tolerate any more trespassing on her property and to make sure any county vehicles stayed within the right of way. No further comments. 4. Federal Funding (FY2022) Project Application The current design on CSAH 19 in the area of TH241 one way pairs was constructed in 2008 as an interim solution. Since 2004, traffic has grown on CSAH 19 approx. 50% to 12,900 cars in the area based on 2016 count. The plan is to remove confusing lane drops and shifts. This will increase accessibility by increasing capacity, decreasing delays and reducing crashes. The project would likely require acquisition of several properties along the corridor. Wright County applied for funding last year and was unsuccessful. With the support of St Michael, they are proposing to apply again January 2018 for approx. $2,000,000.00 in Federal Funds to reduce local costs. Federal Funds would be available in 2022. Potter believes the application will be approved this year. Applications are due January 5 and results of the application should be available by April, 2018. 5. Major Equipment Budget Update Hawkins said they purchased all equipment identified in the budget and have two additional items not budgeted for that could be purchased as they had money left over. The two items are: A message Board that needs to be replaced (was hit and needs to be replaced) and trade in the wheeled bobcat for a tracked bobcat. Brian Jans said the person that hit the message board, their insurance paid for the repair/replacement so there is still money left over there. Daleiden asked how many message boards we currently have? Steve Meyer indicated they have 4 as of now. RECOMMENDATION: It was the consensus that a recommendation be made to the Wright County Board of Commissioners to support the purchase of the tracked bobcat, the needed attachments for the bobcat and the message board. 6. Briarwood Avenue (Access to Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park) With the recent and proposed development of Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park, Monticello Township believes additional regional park traffic will create impacts to Briarwood Ave NE. They have requested that Wright County and the City of Monticello make the necessary improvements needed to Briarwood Ave NE due to extra traffic generated by the regional park. The City of Monticello completed a feasibility report for the Athletic field's portion of the park. Currently, Briarwood Ave NE doesn't meet the requirements to become a county hwy. A traffic count was done in July 2015. Tom Moores said that once the park is built out, there will likely be 1400-1500 cars a day. Christine Husom asked what is the capacity for the road to handle? Vetsch mentioned that there are now more heavy weight vehicles like buses and RV's using the road. Moores said the city study was just for the athletic facility, not the parks and talked about the budget and how fast the project will be completed. The plan has been broken into phases due to budgeting. There is no field construction taking place in next phase. No detailed traffic count was given, they just had a projected attendance for when all the fields are up and running. Potter asked how many fields in total there will be? Angela Schumann said roughly 14. Husom asked how much involvement is County? Marc Mattice said the city & county agreed to a cost share. Mattice also said they would like the Hwy Dept. engineers to help them properly apply for possible State Park Road Account funding. Potter reiterated that Briarwood does not qualify to become a county road. Bob Idziorek said the township is concerned with the cost of maintenance, saying that they don't necessarily benefit from the park complex going in so the extra wear on the roads would become their issue, and is a cost they didn't ask for. Hawkins asked if city could annex the road to make it a city street? Schumann said there are several things to consider when annexing. Moores said the park/complex IS a benefit for the township and hopes the township takes into consideration that this involves growth & development. Schumann asked if a study would be able to determine the estimated additional new wear vs. the current wear? Hausmann said yes. Tom Pawelk said the City agreed to help fund improvements but not maintenance. Daleiden asked about county sales tax for Briarwood. Can they use any sales tax for this project? Hawkins said there would have to be a public hearing to approve that, but it is possible. Mattice asked what the biggest cost concern was for the township - if they are more concerned with seal coat/cracks or snow plowing? The response was the long term maintenance/repair based on additional use, not the snow plowing. Meyer indicated that they have to be very careful what we do, listing several roads leading to county parks with some temporary repairs. Schumann said if there were a study performed, maybe there could be a funding allotment discussion for long term shared maintenance. Hilgart explained his perspective, that the City and County decided to do this improvement and why, in his opinion, it is not fair for the township to have to pay for what they didn't want. He further explained that the township already pays for certain things like maintenance, so what they already spend on maintenance/repair would be worked into a cost share so that their cost doesn't increase. Pawelk suggests that they do a study to see the cost for adding the improvements vs. what is there already, including current maintenance vs. future maintenance, indicating they should have a study on the north and south end in the spring of the year and fall. And also a study on 90th street. Husom said they should perform the study several times a year to get accurate numbers. Vetsch asked who funds this study? The response is the City & County share the cost of the study. Hausmann said it could take about a year to get a complete study with an estimated cost under $10,000. WSB would likely cost less since they have already done some work on it for the city. Pawelk asked if the township is agreeable to discussions on how to proceed? Response is yes, the agreement is to move forward. Hawkins said they will get some quotes to get study done. Pawelk asked when goal date for study would be? Hausmann indicated the end of September 2018. RECOMMENDATION: It was agreed upon that a recommendation be made to the Wright County Board of Commissioners to continue to move forward with this project and to have cost analysis and maintenance studies performed. Other: Nothing. Adjourned: 2:36pm City Council Agenda 03/26/18 2L. Consideration to reaffirm previously levied assessments for the Chelsea Road Extension Proiect, Citv Proiect No. 2005-11C and to direct no further action (AS/JO/WO) A. REFERENCE & BACKGROUND At the last council meeting, Mr. Bob Ryan, owner of Lot 1, Block 1, Otter Creek Crossings 5th Addition, asked for a reduction in assessments on land he has purchased as well as land he and others may purchase in the future at Otter Creek 5th Addition. The assessments were agreed to by the property owners in 2004 and 2006 and again in 2017 and 2018. The City Council has requested information pertaining to the assessments for the Chelsea Road street and utility improvements along and through the plat of Otter Creek Crossings in response. To understand the basis of the assessment, it is important to provide a short history of the plat and road and utility improvements. In 2003, the land which is now Otter Creek was outside of the municipal boundary. To develop the property, it was necessary to annex, plat and serve the site with municipal roads and utilities. At that time, Chelsea Road ended at 90th Street. The property owners, J. Edwin Chadwick, LLC and J.X. Bowers, LLC, (herein after referred to as Chadwick and Bowers) requested the city consider platting of the property due to interest in the land for development. Given the site was outside of city limits and was not served with road and utility access, the City began discussions with the property owners on the actions necessary to develop and serve the property. The discussions included possible acquisition by the City or City HRA of some of the property for a city -owned industrial park. Throughout 2003-2004, the City of Monticello and Chadwick/Bowers negotiated a land acquisition and public improvement project to serve the parcels which would become the Otter Creek Crossings plat. The project involved the acquisition by the City of approximately 120 acres of land for the City industrial park. Chadwick and Bowers retained jointly the land along the interstate for commercial development. As part of the negotiation, the City and property owners agreed on a number of terms for the full Otter Creek plat as related to annexation, mining operations, zoning, storm water ponding, extension of roads and utilities to the site, and the additional land area that would need to be acquired by the City to complete the road extension alignment. The final Chelsea Road and utility assessment amount and terms were part of the negotiation related to the costs and timing of each of these components. A series of detailed agreements including purchase agreement, pre -development agreement and assessment agreement were developed to detail the terms of the land purchase, improvements and assessment. The 429 process was followed relating to the public improvements and assessment for the improvements including feasibility report, public notice and hearing. Chadwick and Bowers agreed to the assessment terms as part of this negotiation and 429 process. The original assessment agreement with Bowers/Chadwick was adopted in 2004 City Council Agenda 03/26/18 at a 6.5% interest rate for a 10 -year term, with a total estimated principal amount of $2,419,154.00. In 2006, the Chelsea Road project was completed. On November 13, 2006, the City Council held a continued public hearing and adopted the assessment roll for the project. The principal amount for the Chadwick/Bowers property assessment totaled $2,311,920.43 based on final project costs, with an interest rate of 5.5%. The principal amount for the original assessment totals $60,569/acre or $1.39/sf based on 38.17 total acres. In 2008, the two property owners requested a subdivision which would allow them to split their remaining property at Otter Creek equally. This action resulted in Bowers owning approximately 19.41 acres (Outlot C and a portion of Outlot D) and Chadwick (remainder of Outlot D) the same. The assessment was therefore re -apportioned in 2009 based on the front footage of each of the two resulting outlot parcels. Prior to the subdivision of the property in 2009, Bowers/Chadwick made $462,384 in payments on the original assessment levied in 2007. At this point, the assessment terms and history on the two portions of property diverge. The summary below provides detail on the status of each assessment. Chadwick Parcels — Otter Creek 51h Addition Mr. Chadwick made additional assessments payments of $113,862 after the property was subdivided. After the subdivision and re -assessment in 2009, Chadwick requested an amendment to the original assessment agreement for his portion of the property, with a term extension to 15 years at the 5.5% interest rate. This request was approved by the City Council in 2009 and an amendment to the original assessment agreement was adopted. Since the time of that amended assessment agreement, Mr. Chadwick has worked with Wright County to hold his parcel in Green Acre status, deferring payment of the balance of the assessment for his parcel until the development of the parcel requires removal from that status. Council will note that the City has no authority in Green Acres designation. However, according to state law, the property owner is responsible for the unpaid interest during the fifteen -year term, as well as interest which continues to accrue on the unpaid balance amount for as long as the property remains in Green Acres. In 2017, Chadwick platted the property from outlot status to lots and blocks as Otter Creek 5th Addition. With the platting, a second request for extension of the assessment terms was requested and approved by the City Council. The assessments per lot have been levied per the First Amendment to Assessment Agreement, including the interest on the original term. The agreement was approved by Council on October 23rd, 2017. The new total assessment per the amended assessment agreement on the 19.08 acres of Otter Creek 5th Addition is $1,088,285, or $57,038/acre or $1.31/sf based on 19.08 acres. The principal of that amount is $770,467.00, with accumulated interest unpaid from the original assessment term of $317,818, but not including new interest for the new 10 -year term. Commercial Realty Solutions has stated that the sales price on the property is currently $2.30/sf not including the assessments. 2 City Council Agenda 03/26/18 Bowers Parcels — Otter Creek 0 Addition The Bowers property assessment was not amended as no request was made after the 2009 subdivision. As such, the parcels continued to be assessed per the 2006 assessment roll. No additional assessment payments were made after the property was split in 2009. Since the time of the original assessment agreement and levy, Bowers has also worked with Wright County to hold the parcel in Green Acre status. Similar to the Chadwick parcels, this allows for deferring of payment of the assessment balance until the development of the parcel requires removal from that status. The property owner is responsible for the unpaid interest during the original ten-year term, as well as interest which continues to accrue on the unpaid balance amount for as long as the property remains in Green Acres. The original ten-year term for the assessment ended in 2016. In 2018, Chadwick requested subdivision of the Bowers parcel. Mr. Bowers signed the application as property owner. With the platting, an amendment for the extension of the assessment term was requested and approved by the City Council for a new ten-year term at 5.5%. The assessments per lot will be levied per the Amendment to Assessment Agreement as approved on February 26th, 2018. The new total assessment payable on the 18.03 acres of Otter Creek 6th Addition will be $1,454,891, or $80,693/acre or $1.85/sf based on 18.03 acres. The principal of this amount is $938,640, with $516,252 of accumulated interest unpaid from the original assessment term, but not including any new interest for the new 10 -year term. No portion of the assessment was assigned to the outlot within the plat. The parcels are marketed by Commercial Realty Solutions at $3.00/sf plus assessments. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS 1. Motion of no action, reaffirming the assessment based on the finding that the assessment was duly developed and adopted. 2. Motion to direct staff to calculate a revised assessment value based on the direction of the Council to be reviewed at an upcoming meeting. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends Alternative #I above. Staff does not recommend any reduction in the principal amount of the assessment or the interest applicable to the amount. The assessments were agreed to by the property owners in 2004 and 2006 and again in 2017 and 2018 and the developers have sold land since that time with assessments as described. The assessment program was duly negotiated and adopted and penalties and interest have been properly applied and necessary to offset City costs. Also, as noted in the report, the current asking price for the land is more than the assessment per square foot. To forgive a portion of the assessment or interest at this time could be construed as supporting a potential for increase in the net profit to the developer. 3 City Council Agenda 03/26/18 It is staff's understanding that the property owners may continue to seek Green Acres status, effectively continuing to defer the assessment on the parcels. It is staff's understanding that Green Acres will not be eligible for Lot 1, Block 1 of Otter Creek 5th Addition, the Ryan parcel. Again, the City does not have authority over this designation. The assessment will remain of record and interest will accrue during any Green Acres deferral. While the Green Acres deferral has added accumulated interest to the principal amount of the assessment, effectively increasing the overall assessment amount to the property, the deferral of the assessment under this provision is a decision of the property owner, not the City. Council will note that trunk area charges are applicable to each lot within the plat at the time of platting. The developer of the lot has the opportunity to request of the Council assessment of these charges to the parcels by development agreement. Mr. Ryan has not requested assessment of the trunk areas charges for his parcel and has in fact paid those charges. D. SUPPORTING DATA A. Plat of Otter Creek Crossing B. Assessment Agreement (2004) & Final Assessment Roll (2006) — Otter Creek C. City Council Minutes, 11/23/06 D. Sales Brochure 4 C 00117171!GE/'� C-, 0 I 1 ER CREEK CROSSING KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That Otter Creek, LLC, a Minnesota Limited Liability Company, fee owner of the following described property situated in the County of Wright, State of Minnesota, to wit: The Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, the South Half of the Northwest Quarter all in Section 10, Township 121, Range 25, Wright County, Minnesota, lying southerly and westerly of Interstate No. 94 right of way except the following described tracts of land: 1) The East 50 rods of said South Half of the Northwest Quarter. 2) Beginning at the northwest comer of said South Half of the Northwest Quarter, thence south along the west line of sold South Half of the Northwest Quarter, a distance of 632.70 feet; thence east deflecting 90 degrees 19 minutes left along an old fence line, a distance of 518.32 feet; thence north parallel with said west line of the South Half of the Northwest Quarter, a distance of 56 feet more or less to the thread of Otter Creek; thence easterly and northerly along said thread of Otter Creek, a distance of 834 feet to the north line of said South Half of the Northwest Quarter, thence west along said north line a distance of 630.00 feet to the point of beginning. And that J. Edwin Chadwick, LLC, a Minnesota Limited Liablity Company, fee owner, J. X. Beat, LLC, a Minnesota Limited Liability Company, fee owner of the following'�p�' described property situated In the County of Wright, State of Minnesota, to wit: That part of the East Half of the Southwest Quarter and that part of Lot B, according to the plat by E. B. McCord recorded May 4, 1886 in Book 1 of Sectional Plats, Page 566, in the North Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 10, Township 121, Range 25, Wright County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest comer of said East Half of the Southwest Quarter, thence North 0 degrees 49 minutes 08 seconds West, assumed bearing along the West line of said East Half of the Southwest Quarter, a distance of 494.12 feet to the actual point of beginning of the land to be described, said point being the Northwest comer of BONDHUS ADDITION, according to the recorded plat; thence South 88 degrees 58 minutes 44 seconds East, along the North line of said BONDHUS ADDITION, a distance of 1167.86 feet to the centerline of a township road (also known as 90th Street Northeast); thence North 45 degrees 19 minutes 28 seconds East, -along said centerline, a distance of 218.66 feet to the East line of sold East Half of the Southwest Quarter, thence North 0 degrees 22 minutes 22 seconds West, along said East line a distance of 46.10 feet to the Northwesterly right—of—way line of said township road, said point being 696.34 feet North of the Southeast comer of said East Half of the Southwest Quarter, as measured along said East line; thence North 49 degrees 38 minutes 15 seconds West, a distance of 476.31 feet; thence North 40 degrees 21 minutes 44 seconds East, a distance of 418.51 feet to the North line of the Southeast Quarter of said Southwest Quarter, thence South 88 degrees 54 minutes 20 seconds East, along said North line of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, a distance of 88.25 feet to the Northeast comer of said Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter and the Southwest corner of said Lot B of the North Half of the Southeast Quarter, thence South 89 degrees 32 minutes 41 seconds East along the South line of said Lot 8 (also being the South line of said North Half of the Southeast Quarter), a distance of 223.15 feet; thence North 45 degrees 28 minutes 47 seconds East, a distance of 530.02 feet; thence South 53 degrees 14 minutes 41 seconds East, a distance of 319.12 feet to the southeasterly line of said Lot B, formerly the centerline of 90th Street Northeast and also being the northwesterly line of 90TH STREET 2ND ADDITION, according to the recorded plat; thence North 45 degrees 19 minutes 28 seconds East, along the southeasterly line of said Lot B. a distance of 498.00 feet more or less to the Southwesterly right—of—way line of interstate Highway Number 94; thence Northwesterly along sold Southwesterly right—of—way line, to Its intersection with the North line of said Lot B, also being the North line of said North Half of the Southeast Quarter, thence North 88 degrees 50 minutes 00 seconds West along said North line of Lot B, a distance of 195.42 feet to the Northeast comer of said East Half of the Southwest Quarter, thence continue North 88 degrees 50 minutes 00 seconds West, along the North line of said East Half of the Southwest Quarter a distance of 1342.19 feet to the Northwest comer of said East Half of the Southwest Quarter, thence South 0 degrees 49 minutes 08 seconds East, along the West line of said East Half of the Southwest Quarter a distance of 2153.98 feet to the point of beginning. AND That part of The East 50 rods of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 10, Township 121, Range 25 lying Southwesterly of 1-94; and that part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 10, Township 121, Range 25, lying Southwesterly of 1-94; Wright County, Minnesota. And that the City of Monticello, Minnesota, a Minnesota municipal corporation, fee owner of the following described property situated in the County of Wright, State of Minnesota, to wit: That part of Lot B, according to the plat by E. B. McCord recorded May 4, 1886 in Book 1 of Sectional Plats, Page 566, in the North Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 10, Township 121, Range 25, Wright County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest comer of said Lot B of the North Half of the Southeast Quarter; thence South 89 degrees 32 minutes 41 seconds East along the South line of sold Lot B (also being the South line of said North Half of the Southeast Quarter), a distance of 223.15 feet to the point of beginning of the land to be described; thence North 45 degrees 28 minutes 47 seconds East, a distance of 530.02 feet; thence South 53 degrees 14 minutes 41 seconds East, a distance of 319.12 feet to the southeasterly line of said Lot B, formerly the centerline of 90th Street Northeast and also being the northwesterly line of 90TH STREET 2ND ADDITION, according to the recorded plat; thence South 45 degrees 19 minutes 28 seconds West, along the southeasterly line of said Lot 8, a distance of 271.31 feet more or less to the South line of said Lot B: thence North 89 degrees 32 minutes 41 seconds West along said South line of Lot B, a distance of 441.15 feet to the point of beginning. Hoye caused the some to be surveyed and platted as OTTER CREEK CROSSING and do hereby donate and dedicate to the public for public use forever the Road, Highway and the easements for drainage and utility purposes only as shown on this plat. 4 In witness whereof said Otter Creek, LLC, has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this 13 day of Dece-n+aGc• 2069.1. SIGNED: its chief manager and president /)6hn E. Chadwick (/STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OFHen� —�• @ foregoing instrument wag acknowledged before me this � day of �e� erry�'f�d' 20 Oy by ':Yo 1% �,� IV "Nagpr 0.A rj A1ni'of Otter Creek LLC, a Minnesota Limited Ua6111ty Company, on behalf of the company. Notary 1 r. CYNTFflA J. MOR' No ary Public. Gan A� County, Minnesota NOTARYrualC•IMt1��O My Commission expires �'�,�� q,.,� 31 alas M►c4�rrM•s In witness whereof sold J. Edwin Chadwick, LLC, has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this _anay of CLe. rA b Q.lr SIGNED� 46 �l� nn/6/E. Chadwick STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF C e , its manager and vice president The foregoing instrument was acknowledged (A6.A(►gtr $ ?P>e < i a Ve% t of before me this day of IeCe r bar 20 0q by JO�Y1 G• Chadw �l4 J. Edwin Chodwic LLC, a Minnesota Limited Liability Company, on behalf of the company. CYNTHIA J. MORICAL Notary Public, County, Minnesota i A a NOTARY R�uc•+r�: My Commission expires an�cxn� 313.1QQr) ryCanulwMM�M.>A Or\ I;%\4_ b� C-t,MMexc-:\oA 9o_rA-huc_s "�\•�1L ?f� In witness whereof said J. X Bowers, LLC, has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this ,� day of Nrlenr%6 er 20 Doi `�Ikb�� its James K. Bowers STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OFht!n^e 5Th foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this /tday of Dee era+ h er 20 OH . by 16-fnea k. L e a C r 5_, chief manager of J. X. Bowers, LLC, a Minnesota Limited Liability Company, on behalf of the company. ivrf(� CYNTHIA J. MORICAL Nota Public, h Count Minnesota 4 NOTARY PUBLIC -MINNESOTA rY Y. My Commission expires S �,,� MY Cammisbn E)9*=AwL31,= In witness whereof City of Monticello, Minnesota, has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this\ +ti day of \_14jC C r••.jh C !• , 20c t SK j N U its C3 �;45 Cr+y Aoarrn/iSrAATV/L. rn , ,-�`•^+,v J0� STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF\,4 1:�e foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me. this 1 � day of e Cerr.'r e;: 20 by `>ruc_� �h,e\e•Z , r" CA��oY +•RNck.of the Cit of Monticello, Minnesota, a Minnesota Municipal Corporatfon, on behalf of the corporation. C.%A•`1 iac\M.1k5tock, rovr O0---k) , �'1"n -)- A.O S S v10 C, Notary Public, km, \n \�.�_ Cabrity, Minnesota My Commission expires Z.\ �o I hereby certify that I have surveyed and platted the property described on this plat as OTTER CREEK CROSSING; that this plat is a correct representation of said survey, that all distances are correctly shown on the plat in feet and hundredths of a foot; that all monuments have been correctly placed in the ground as shown, or will be placed as required by the local government unit; that the outside boundary lines are correctly designated on the plat; and that there are no wet lands as defined in Minnesota Statutes Section 505.02 Subd. 1 or public highways to be designated on the plat, other than as shown. r.rtM:7Kii.ch., Licensed Land Surveyor Minnesota License -No. 23968 t,1 The foregoing surveyors certificate was acknowledged before me this �� day of T)e_ac %b4Lr; 20-9-q by Kurt M. Kisch, Licensed Land Surveyor, Minnesota License No. 23968. p CYNTHIA J. MORICAL NOTARY PUBLIC -MINNESOTA Notary Public, ennepin County, Minnesota STATE OF MINNESOTA MYComrxc;anEzpimsJan 31.2005 M Commission expires —T'c�n. 31 . oAooS COUNTY OFk),) ^1.k).� Y P BtC� <PEf CITY COUNCIL This plat of OTTER CREEK CROSSING was approved and accepted in compliance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.03, Subdivision 2, by the City Council of Monticello, Minnesota at a meeting held thisday of 00vc.yr e&.•2001,f' CITY OF MONTICELLO, MILAN lJif ltes� < Mayor t Vc/ City Administrator CITY PLANNING COMMISSION This plat of OTTER CREEK CROSSING was approved and accepted by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota at a meeting held this �5+ day of 20' 1 nn Chairman N I ri" Secretary COUNTY AUDITOR, Wright County, Minnesota Taxes paid for all years through year 2663and transfer entered this 83RD day ofDeeco%be-r. 20-QY Wright Coun y Auditor =' DAWN iJ GROSSINGcf, NoTPRY PUELIC _ fXWlESOT% �'� LK CC'"• EXP 0 11310-5 0-5 COUNTY TREASURER, Wright County, Minnesota 1 hereby certify that taxes payable in the year ago y on lands herein described are paid this 23 TtP day of l�eee.x he r 20Q�. 20DLI^- 1� Wright County Treasurer - ., - COUNTY HIGHWAY ENGINEER, Wright County, Minnesota This plat was recommended for. approval this 23! day of 20_9�4 O V,v fi,p_lWright County Highway Engineer COUNTY SURVEYOR, Wright County, Minnesota Examined and recommended for approval this 23 day of 16ecze ,,�e, 20R -t ight County Surveyor COUNTY RECORDER, Wright County, Minnesota I hereby certify that this instrument was filed in the office of the County Recorder for record on this "i day of �C'(emh2f, 20t!9,at 4',ON o'clock j .m., and was duly recorded in Cabinet Sleeve ) 654 as Document Number, 9 4 05") 9 1� A'fA r� • IdIl.1 �� Wright County Retarder 3LIAD CK 'LL --)5)�- ., - C RLK - Kuusisto; Ltd. SHEET 1 OF 3 SHEETS OFFICIAL_ PLAT - zsl�� N h� 0 I IER CREEK CROSSING tf� 5895344Ea� m 518.32 \ 255.87 �/ l,,� OO.O \ n N \\ `° ' \ \\ to < _ _ SB5-45'24"W r% �O��Q`S/ s bo \ m n o i N _ ~ 4944 — * — — — �L _ — 27i:49�-� ••6.10 S%Sy\ _ �O\ \ \ r, con \ `�"o. a I I •I I 3 2 N89 -53.44"W —^ !� ui 825 192.5 I o a e N5 \ ^ \ z0I 53 S\10 53 - N \ A / -1 / A Z I/ ,i \047.1 " �\ al I V V 10 too I I I W 2 foot drainag and utility easement----- 7 7 LOT 1 s \ ` \ \ \\ o @\ \ `-7 0 200 400 s \ 5• � ONS I I I I I As 29'2>> 3�4 BLOCK 2 0.29. \ �� g \ ,pR \\ ti a� SCALE IN FEET \�y29. \ �� / Scale: 1 Inch = 200 Feet WEST Y4 CORNER o SEC 10, TWP. 121, _I IRCE 25, WRIGHT COUNTY N '9T \ ,� \ \ r 7 I ICAST IRON MONUMENT Ch \\ \ \\ ` \ tom) `� •O Denotes found Wright County cast iron monument --NORTH LINE \ - `� \ �`L NORTHEAST CORNER \ \ / \ i` ,\ - � • Denotes found iron monument OF NE Y4 - SW Y4 O \ OF THEE Yz - SW Ya / c. \ \� SEC. 10. T. 121, R 25-,\ NORTH LINE LOT B p Denotes 1 y 741.G'I ,I \ ry1 0 ` �\ SEC 10 T 121 R. 25 �,�\ �o/2 inch b 14 inch iron monument that \ y 7 _ _ \ ` - sem\ \- OF N Y - SE Ya will be set within one � / year of recording of this plat, 1342.79 - \ - s _ € \ „ \ ,' SEC 10 7 121 R 25 \ 5 ---2684.37--- 1 1 \ _ _ and marked with Minnesota Registration No. 23968. I I \ NBB50'00"W ) \ \ 1342 19 .y �* \ \ - - 1- - - g \ \ N8850100"W / , \ 195.42 tjDEED \ ' -NORTHWEST CORNER OryA / 3f` \ 11195.37 MEA) Denotes wet land 12' \ i o OF THE E YZ - SW Y h°' 901, 62• \ \ N885000"W- _ S ry/ I , , \ For the purposes of this plat the West line of the s OUTLOT D / \ East Half of the Southwest Quarter of Section 10, P •' 1 /Z \ AO. \ o00 \ \ \0 s� _ 1 9 \ \ Township 121, Range 25, Wright County, Minnesota, �A " \ �S \ C, \ is assumed to bear S00'49'08"E. OJ s' \ b� _ h I \ ayr oo \ I \O� o0 \ ta,. Z!qs ltiA07,9`9g �s0 rr \ %\ ro , / n I3 C \\ j�Ai• ori \ '�09 '�1 Q��S' All O O)62 1 3 F \ /` AO, J 1 r f o y \\ ✓ `I WN I OUTLOT B \\\ \ \ n �K F i 1 \\ �\ \ I ✓ e "as 4 \ DETAIL .\�'� h^ I IO v= I \ \ I \ C' \ a Easement �\ \\ m \ v NI !/ J (I �\ \� \ \ ,\`2LAs• �.�1,//o/ �•O /6y0 g/lLOj �/o.,S�s\.I 0 iAO' %x w\ 33 I e�\OT0OUTLOT E Ito \ \ \ \ \ 'Q \ •� \ 1 11 I I / , \ A o' ? \ 2s\\ / / 4572 44"E �yyS?h 06 47., a., e 82.5 82.5 \ , \ \ I / ,\` 2s, \ 00 4�2 ( N ` O\ OrO o�}-6�6! \ffi. ?/ �'S./JF,_`P. ,` `� ?o�e ••�• \ \ N755\3. 19�O 3 7 G 60 "W IQ. 11 ` 12 foot drainage and utility easement SOUTHWEST CORNER LOT B� o; - -1j, O� `� O Ss cFgrO�6��9�'y� 2oPoG \ j OF THE N Y2 - SE Y4 vin 0f O�� P° \ A> F 1��0 zl P r 'vim \ 90 30 srP ^ \ \ AND NORTHEAST CORNER N' Sry LSF \ \ \ 5 I \ OF SE Y4 - SW Y4 o a56.�` \ 20 !oP \\ \r�� \ I SEC. 10 T. 121 R. 25 -- 0 h�00,p�� 46s� "Ac9 {', �cl - \ o Z fSi, �o,� 12 fo t drainage and utylity easement -------=_V p `�00`.L�' O'( A 3• ` � ,�O c., 9 oy� � `�-. ` � c" N .� _ 8J Por— \ I \ osP-�i\ \ I 33 6 \�� S67' S6" `i, n \ OT G 3 4 ! -� — —�. — , \ P _ I X116. / 47. 0 p1 t G�" 0 •�- i I / I Oe!lechon Paint "' ` 1331.02 }-- \ _ i' 1 1 r 1 441.15 (DEED) k� A �`` Sj �� u c i� DeAecfm to the /e/t l t \ I 1331.02 �, 4,-223.15— — I — _ —443.76 MEAS '` / j0 'S 76 c- n 9 03 .. N88 54 20 ""W �1 \ 00 \ 6 $ A6 L — 1 = 61'47'56 "E 1 AI v c 6-t 666.91 MEAS. \ 03 \ II 2434 54 Z 0 I `-NORTH LINE OF SE Y4-\Y4��SW p i i� - // \ \ j 664.30 (D(£ED) ) -- �`'j ` ---- ---- ---- SEC 10 T. 121 R. 25 \ S88 J8 27 f(MEAS.) / S8932'41 E (DEED) FDIV))Jr ` ��SOUTH LINE LOT B Southwester! corner of \� _ y �= \ V SEC. 10 T. 121 SE R 25 SIREETLot 3, 8AD01 ON lock 2, 0� 1� I— Z w� 88.94 �ME-AS.)x / ` ` � W (� 588'54'20"E \ \ \ / Ik w o I f 88 25 (D ED) �N I 967.08 \\ \ \ \ V) 0 5885420"E <v 1 ��-1 a� \ \ \ \ \ "N\ % wow 60 foot wideO ,� r, ^ Temporary Storm Water Drain — �)" m to Easement (Not recorded) \ \ i \ \ \ 951\ \ r J,.. N 0 c11 OUTLOT F n I / I `t 12 foot drainage and utility easement- - --\\^ �\ryp 'I�✓1, I �r . _�-46.96 (MEAS) A\ I '-Pipe Cine Easement 1 \ / 'Q`� 46.10 (DEED) y` • r r ,-NORTH LINE OF I 1 J (per Doc No. 774490) v / 6 N0020'16 -W (MEAS) r BONDHUS ADDITION / \ Nooz222"w (DEED) 77.30-s .L-------------�---------L -90�h, STREET NE +/ NORTHWEST CORNER I 'tu40 1167.48 (MEAS.) } ` / '� -\ \ OF BONDHUS ADDITION ---' �N 11167.28 (PLAT) /�/ Vi Q '� 3 1167.86 (DEED) �iT 1 Q p ly) t0 (A of 885920E (MEAS) � vlP�• v a g \ I 3 :i"N / 58858"44Efb£ED*\\ r� "\V��l Pcj old 33 -F Por 00 N I ? w wH h'"� 7 '\ i� 1 ` \ �` /i� �r•Qi' l�F'�,0� url ; co N osP Pte•. o .z l.4 \ L pi- e��rN o, Ota INJ WO �� >^) \ ) ,(j� 66 at(.� 0,0 N - "~'roPor. tp`ao ` �r7� n,✓� ��<v/ ��•ryo \ 200 z v�'ovw `�,6 1 \ �r/� k4j�cj9ry oc �r SOUTHWEST CORNER \ ; ✓ 6(�� ^\ / -r �k 9,y0 PP.. OF THE EY- SW Y4 SEC. 10 T. 121 R. 25--� 1 v ✓ <-� / (^j SOUTH Y4 CORNER -O I' �%rA J SEC. f0, TWP. 121, RGE. `. � s 1319.85 - _i, /\ / j. 25, WRIGHTWCOUNTY CAST - 13 9$5 IRON MONUMENT -- SOUTHWEST CORNER N88'58'45"W 2639.70 / - --� CIM 754.30 SEC. 10, TWP 121, - RGE. 25 ., - n ., - ., - ., - 1 DETAIL r Not to scale OC / e D`CPO�ec,. / \) P G 3r •f\ 10 / (j6,0 06 Aso 1 / V) 6'. \ // � Y - _S 3*14'41"E 33.35 Ads,- - JS45.06'16"W \'7 41.92 > S61 '47'56"E 34.49 roa "-* �06°ry0 hh 5 / �T �\ iWiZ ( 1 / RLK - Kuusisto, Ltd. SHEET 2 OF 3 SHEETS ., - i �- 82.50 -19435 \ \ \ I I -----NORTHWEST CORNER SEC. 10, TWP. 121, RGE. 25 I n I"` -DETAIL j < 0 sQ�6 C.S.A.H. OFFICIAL PLAT O I'VE R CREEK CROSSING / LIU LJ `o F \ -- C.S.A.H. N0. 39 EST 1l -)I/\1 IT /\/\I I� IT\/ 1 11/\I 111/ A \ C)I R rr111\7x11 VVlJlvl I rTlVrlrrnl r\Iv'71 VI I \ 1 11/ A A T A J Y2 - NW Y4 / n 627± (MEAS.) I\ + 15890070'E 1 1 c� N0. 39 r, 630.00 DEED _ I \ — r 1-1 T— �- -CORNER ST '�' RIGHT COUNTY In uu, v r nc � �\ \\ I \ � (DEED)/r� 1051.86 .. RI VI'i1 LrVVLI I HIVHVI' RIOLT O \...r / u1A.. oI AT •In i I t + \ 12 46: 1 1 �/ - v OF s �Nw Y. ,•� I Ln l 1.V. 3---- ; , 1 / _ _1 59.10 u4i 0._ ; 589 00'l0I"E I In \ I + \ In 0,4 \ -a1 0 %? _ _ _ `-� A I I ' �` I ' c NORTH LINE S 473.10 { 37L,'C00 /. n 1/1 + \ \ OF S Y - NW Yal 24� \ •�- 269.56— X4.98• �. /-- .r1. vU. .: ) 3 i i 1\, \ �a .F p=19'30'19'" 1N00'02 26"E 7— 6271 (MEAS.)— h o 'SB900'10'Ej-- l 1 I _ x.11 \eu .1y43L=115.75 I .630.00 (DEED) _I+ t r. 1051.871 _159.10- 12abo it 1 v 58900;10f ) In 1 / -\ \ --- — ---- N �O \p. �\ �\ 6�i 44 \� o - a731oI1 i 1 �1 0 \O ; s \ 6 ?0 -- 12 foot arainage an y NORTH LINE O xv \ 269.56 ` 24 98� __ 107 55 / �Q� ��' \ p- �� 0 + -L=45.$1 o I y ------=-- Ci O J �^ 6 r OF S Yz - NW Y 'L \ _-�---�4=19'30'19' 43519 4 I `� ,�\\ Gj O y <J� �� `\\ p \Q �Q -10 05 44,' .h c ti 1N00'02'26"E , — — _ C �/y4 L-11575 + N8900'lOW %\ \ \ fir\ � \ �'� N 3a4. I I `\ a Go - Ln \\Q '< - 1 {p \a \\ L-45 .$1°F --12 toot ralnage and utility easement - �s r U i R=300.00 \> ` A=10'05 44%'� + l ^ .. a . I \ o Z N0. > \ rn \'P r \ . I / \ \ F- �• �: \ r V, io = 0 2 0 p N m t\ n r n \� \` \ Vl �1 t^ \ \ r A=19'30" 19„ 4 ° a 2 I \\ -A y W�• \ � vI. ;'-L=102 13 \ - \ \ w rn �+ - \ o ` `. n �` ` \+\ '� a1930Q19" \ //' z -drainage and zID v H W \ \� / %v z �_ I // �+_ _\ = i utility easement ill z �-drainage and WEST LINE OF THE \ I I Cp . / 41 _ EAST 50 RODSutility easement I n OF THE SE Ya '- NW Ys EAST 50 RODS 825 FT) >S' (!) Q) ♦ Y 1 \ Qp ---------------- w n Ntn 3' Q\ \ " J `� .+I Survey line CN v�' I S. \ SEC 10 T 121 R 25--'' _j ----------------y `� ,H I Survey line h ` ♦ \ ! /. \\ \ r \ 4o J O O l3 �a) 1 U W/ < O� v .j4'S o o \ \°s �s OUTLOT C 3 / \\ W C �/ W N i Iryryp } /� �O \sA M 1a I W w Z Mi //^r�v�0- I i 5895344'Eo = N� l\ s0`s� \ ri o \ J 4 EtZ J < 1 � s 518.32 — 255 8•WN % O'` Q\ 06�` OHO o \ rn W o \ \ I10 \ 7 \ = __25587 N \ Q� - - - - - CS S85'45'24- ,+ %ro CS S/. " \° \ o S \ h a - 45'24"W % O `S GS SAO O \ a ~ 4941 4 3 �i - 27i:49�� S�S9\ a° ` \ \ n \\ ��p /� - � - — — — — — — — `O \ �' 585 _ rr 0' k 7. G\ a / I \' N89*53'44"W 'S 3 \ 7T `rm. 7 ,�.+` ! 271.49 I� \ \'2p�5\ \\ g �s >' N89'S3'441'W c S0 `'�•- \ 82 5 142.5 1 1a dS \ O p,. I I \ I I 1 oN//L i'T �� 5\4053 �\ n` \VA`/ �I//tet 0 ( 'c� I I I z lis^ O \ a16 % m o 7 O 1 10 100 I ,- a0� --O 830^ \ �s `�' \ \ b`r 1 \_ e Lu I 1 - - - 2 foot dralnag and utility easement----- \ \ Zoon. 7 e Ntn I I I I yR9�9• LOT 1 '34 R��'6' \\ �"�� \ �� BLOCK 2 a: \4s \ Zt0 I I I I I 3 ?� F 2g9� 9g9004 1 I I ro- 4 oo , \ \\ � o \ I i WEST Ya CORNER e o - \ \ \ \ \ � <� ` SEC. 10, TWP 121, .� 'LJ \ \ \ .i r RGE. 25. WRIGHT COUNTY �%• ` \ / -rCASi IRON MONUMENT _ \ \ ' NORTHEAST CORNER -NORTH LINE \./' ,� OF THE E Y , \ NORTH LINE LOT B OF NE Y. - 21 Y / ° \ SEC. 10, T 2121 SR Y25-. \ \ ,' ' 24100 \i - \ 1 -, 'SEC 10 T 121 R 25 \ O _ SE \ y 0 +\1 + 96\ �\\ SEC. 10 T 121 YR 25 `\ \ '7 134219 ---2684 37--- 1\ I ) J\ 134219 , \ 5 N8850'00"W I / , N8850'00'W / l ` \ + 195 42 (DEEDj� - - \ \ I`- �° 1 / �' MEA fS) \ l �� i I SW to OF THE E NORTHWEST CORNER 9+ °L! 61 \ \ I 1195.37 N8850�00"W \ .a t2" \ � / Yz - Ys eek e0/.` sOUTLOT S`7 O.\is o \\ 'r6•g�o�s\ / 1 1 \\S`jj �> \ . or -P, I I I W I SS ✓ os .�v : 9p\ 1R srp u?6,,JQ O/ , �o U,pV,"cil 7. 1 9P q ' \ s �? (� \ I ^ / Asr' 0 .0�+' 0 200 400 SCALE IN FEET Scale: 1 Inch = 200 Feet I I ?! \ \ \ \ ^ 9b 61 4Se3 • Denotes found iron monument 3N . I OUTLOT B \ I °F ' i \ \ l T Pa "4. \\ DETAIL-'^\� 0 Denotes 1/2 inch by 14 inch iron monument that uIN ° m \ \ \ n I 1 1 \ \\ \ y p Sed y? �o \ / will be set within one year of recording of this plat, \\ and marked with Minnesota Registration No. 23968. ) I I0- ° = I \\ \ \\ y \ \ 1 J o°a \/ \ \ t \ A, Denotes wet land ON i l i o 0 0 \ ./ \ \ 1 _ � 7> Drmerm, / �/ � \ \ '.`1' A v t / c°acre / \ `h \ P 1 ►7 Easement /L t o' e 2� 1w tacjsa0. \ 4aa \� 1,6 / 4.s, 2s\ <.329s \I �'' I n n'C \ W I r `\ \"S• O �� fo // OS..> 48 5^ — 1 ,. \ Qao arno rn N 1 / /✓✓% I . \ \2 d• .�'L o .O/ 0° '✓ O •\ '+� I \ In aid \ ao) NI / 1 \ • \ \ �R?°.. /' �D`'• `0� 2^ I I I 1 \ \ olL\ \ y/ �)z o OUTLOT E I -8.33 e \ \ Ir 11 8251 82.51 'Ill 1iii > \ +L 12 foot drainage and utility easement ------moo \ oor \ II \ I\ I\ 1 ~ I \ 1 1 1 \ V) �• IW Ig \ SOUTHWEST CORNER LOT B o3 -- 1 \ OF THE N Y2 - SE N a• \ AND NORTHEAST CORNER a O 1 \ OF SE Ya - SW Ys O 1 \ SEC. 10 T. 121 R. 25 I o �jy^ + 1 h 12 4t drainage and utility easement - z,------_, y, �4 / N457244'E t'4 ObO �s O'6Ss r�r�ll // I q1,q\ 9V5 'y , 0 For the purposes of this plat the West line of the East Half of the Southwest Quarter of Section 10, Township 121, Range 25, Wright County, Minnesota, is assumed to bear S00'49'08"E. f2LK - Kuusisto, Ltd. I SHEET 3 OF 3 SHEETS -Northwest corner of NE 1/4 of SE 1/4 o. I- c� I") r` Lno -West line of NE 1/4 - `^/ SE 1/4, SEC. 4, TWP 121, RGE. 25 1 A�� 1 r 1 x % 14 If I"` -DETAIL j < 0 sQ�6 C.S.A.H. OFFICIAL PLAT O I'VE R CREEK CROSSING / LIU LJ `o F \ -- C.S.A.H. N0. 39 EST 1l -)I/\1 IT /\/\I I� IT\/ 1 11/\I 111/ A \ C)I R rr111\7x11 VVlJlvl I rTlVrlrrnl r\Iv'71 VI I \ 1 11/ A A T A J Y2 - NW Y4 / n 627± (MEAS.) I\ + 15890070'E 1 1 c� N0. 39 r, 630.00 DEED _ I \ — r 1-1 T— �- -CORNER ST '�' RIGHT COUNTY In uu, v r nc � �\ \\ I \ � (DEED)/r� 1051.86 .. RI VI'i1 LrVVLI I HIVHVI' RIOLT O \...r / u1A.. oI AT •In i I t + \ 12 46: 1 1 �/ - v OF s �Nw Y. ,•� I Ln l 1.V. 3---- ; , 1 / _ _1 59.10 u4i 0._ ; 589 00'l0I"E I In \ I + \ In 0,4 \ -a1 0 %? _ _ _ `-� A I I ' �` I ' c NORTH LINE S 473.10 { 37L,'C00 /. n 1/1 + \ \ OF S Y - NW Yal 24� \ •�- 269.56— X4.98• �. /-- .r1. vU. .: ) 3 i i 1\, \ �a .F p=19'30'19'" 1N00'02 26"E 7— 6271 (MEAS.)— h o 'SB900'10'Ej-- l 1 I _ x.11 \eu .1y43L=115.75 I .630.00 (DEED) _I+ t r. 1051.871 _159.10- 12abo it 1 v 58900;10f ) In 1 / -\ \ --- — ---- N �O \p. �\ �\ 6�i 44 \� o - a731oI1 i 1 �1 0 \O ; s \ 6 ?0 -- 12 foot arainage an y NORTH LINE O xv \ 269.56 ` 24 98� __ 107 55 / �Q� ��' \ p- �� 0 + -L=45.$1 o I y ------=-- Ci O J �^ 6 r OF S Yz - NW Y 'L \ _-�---�4=19'30'19' 43519 4 I `� ,�\\ Gj O y <J� �� `\\ p \Q �Q -10 05 44,' .h c ti 1N00'02'26"E , — — _ C �/y4 L-11575 + N8900'lOW %\ \ \ fir\ � \ �'� N 3a4. I I `\ a Go - Ln \\Q '< - 1 {p \a \\ L-45 .$1°F --12 toot ralnage and utility easement - �s r U i R=300.00 \> ` A=10'05 44%'� + l ^ .. a . I \ o Z N0. > \ rn \'P r \ . I / \ \ F- �• �: \ r V, io = 0 2 0 p N m t\ n r n \� \` \ Vl �1 t^ \ \ r A=19'30" 19„ 4 ° a 2 I \\ -A y W�• \ � vI. ;'-L=102 13 \ - \ \ w rn �+ - \ o ` `. n �` ` \+\ '� a1930Q19" \ //' z -drainage and zID v H W \ \� / %v z �_ I // �+_ _\ = i utility easement ill z �-drainage and WEST LINE OF THE \ I I Cp . / 41 _ EAST 50 RODSutility easement I n OF THE SE Ya '- NW Ys EAST 50 RODS 825 FT) >S' (!) Q) ♦ Y 1 \ Qp ---------------- w n Ntn 3' Q\ \ " J `� .+I Survey line CN v�' I S. \ SEC 10 T 121 R 25--'' _j ----------------y `� ,H I Survey line h ` ♦ \ ! /. \\ \ r \ 4o J O O l3 �a) 1 U W/ < O� v .j4'S o o \ \°s �s OUTLOT C 3 / \\ W C �/ W N i Iryryp } /� �O \sA M 1a I W w Z Mi //^r�v�0- I i 5895344'Eo = N� l\ s0`s� \ ri o \ J 4 EtZ J < 1 � s 518.32 — 255 8•WN % O'` Q\ 06�` OHO o \ rn W o \ \ I10 \ 7 \ = __25587 N \ Q� - - - - - CS S85'45'24- ,+ %ro CS S/. " \° \ o S \ h a - 45'24"W % O `S GS SAO O \ a ~ 4941 4 3 �i - 27i:49�� S�S9\ a° ` \ \ n \\ ��p /� - � - — — — — — — — `O \ �' 585 _ rr 0' k 7. G\ a / I \' N89*53'44"W 'S 3 \ 7T `rm. 7 ,�.+` ! 271.49 I� \ \'2p�5\ \\ g �s >' N89'S3'441'W c S0 `'�•- \ 82 5 142.5 1 1a dS \ O p,. I I \ I I 1 oN//L i'T �� 5\4053 �\ n` \VA`/ �I//tet 0 ( 'c� I I I z lis^ O \ a16 % m o 7 O 1 10 100 I ,- a0� --O 830^ \ �s `�' \ \ b`r 1 \_ e Lu I 1 - - - 2 foot dralnag and utility easement----- \ \ Zoon. 7 e Ntn I I I I yR9�9• LOT 1 '34 R��'6' \\ �"�� \ �� BLOCK 2 a: \4s \ Zt0 I I I I I 3 ?� F 2g9� 9g9004 1 I I ro- 4 oo , \ \\ � o \ I i WEST Ya CORNER e o - \ \ \ \ \ � <� ` SEC. 10, TWP 121, .� 'LJ \ \ \ .i r RGE. 25. WRIGHT COUNTY �%• ` \ / -rCASi IRON MONUMENT _ \ \ ' NORTHEAST CORNER -NORTH LINE \./' ,� OF THE E Y , \ NORTH LINE LOT B OF NE Y. - 21 Y / ° \ SEC. 10, T 2121 SR Y25-. \ \ ,' ' 24100 \i - \ 1 -, 'SEC 10 T 121 R 25 \ O _ SE \ y 0 +\1 + 96\ �\\ SEC. 10 T 121 YR 25 `\ \ '7 134219 ---2684 37--- 1\ I ) J\ 134219 , \ 5 N8850'00"W I / , N8850'00'W / l ` \ + 195 42 (DEEDj� - - \ \ I`- �° 1 / �' MEA fS) \ l �� i I SW to OF THE E NORTHWEST CORNER 9+ °L! 61 \ \ I 1195.37 N8850�00"W \ .a t2" \ � / Yz - Ys eek e0/.` sOUTLOT S`7 O.\is o \\ 'r6•g�o�s\ / 1 1 \\S`jj �> \ . or -P, I I I W I SS ✓ os .�v : 9p\ 1R srp u?6,,JQ O/ , �o U,pV,"cil 7. 1 9P q ' \ s �? (� \ I ^ / Asr' 0 .0�+' 0 200 400 SCALE IN FEET Scale: 1 Inch = 200 Feet I I ?! \ \ \ \ ^ 9b 61 4Se3 • Denotes found iron monument 3N . I OUTLOT B \ I °F ' i \ \ l T Pa "4. \\ DETAIL-'^\� 0 Denotes 1/2 inch by 14 inch iron monument that uIN ° m \ \ \ n I 1 1 \ \\ \ y p Sed y? �o \ / will be set within one year of recording of this plat, \\ and marked with Minnesota Registration No. 23968. ) I I0- ° = I \\ \ \\ y \ \ 1 J o°a \/ \ \ t \ A, Denotes wet land ON i l i o 0 0 \ ./ \ \ 1 _ � 7> Drmerm, / �/ � \ \ '.`1' A v t / c°acre / \ `h \ P 1 ►7 Easement /L t o' e 2� 1w tacjsa0. \ 4aa \� 1,6 / 4.s, 2s\ <.329s \I �'' I n n'C \ W I r `\ \"S• O �� fo // OS..> 48 5^ — 1 ,. \ Qao arno rn N 1 / /✓✓% I . \ \2 d• .�'L o .O/ 0° '✓ O •\ '+� I \ In aid \ ao) NI / 1 \ • \ \ �R?°.. /' �D`'• `0� 2^ I I I 1 \ \ olL\ \ y/ �)z o OUTLOT E I -8.33 e \ \ Ir 11 8251 82.51 'Ill 1iii > \ +L 12 foot drainage and utility easement ------moo \ oor \ II \ I\ I\ 1 ~ I \ 1 1 1 \ V) �• IW Ig \ SOUTHWEST CORNER LOT B o3 -- 1 \ OF THE N Y2 - SE N a• \ AND NORTHEAST CORNER a O 1 \ OF SE Ya - SW Ys O 1 \ SEC. 10 T. 121 R. 25 I o �jy^ + 1 h 12 4t drainage and utility easement - z,------_, y, �4 / N457244'E t'4 ObO �s O'6Ss r�r�ll // I q1,q\ 9V5 'y , 0 For the purposes of this plat the West line of the East Half of the Southwest Quarter of Section 10, Township 121, Range 25, Wright County, Minnesota, is assumed to bear S00'49'08"E. f2LK - Kuusisto, Ltd. I SHEET 3 OF 3 SHEETS r_ Doc. No. A 940580 OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA Certified Filed and/or Recorded on 12-23-2004 at 04:00 Check #: 7518 Fee:: 19.50 Payment Code 02 Add[ Fee Larry A. Unger, County Recorder ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") made this='`, day of 2004, by and between the CITY OF MONTICELLO, a Minnesota municipal cor�oration ("City") with offices at 505 Walnut Street, Monticello, Minnesota 55362, and OTTER CREEK, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company ("Otter Creek), whose Tax I.D. Number is 41- 1911189, J. EDWIN CHADWICK, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, whose Tax I.D. Number is 41-1888159 and J. X. BOWERS, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, whose Tax I.D. Number is 41-1977595 (J. Edwin Chadwick, LLC and J. X. Bowers, LLC are "JEC/JXB", and Otter Creek and JEC/JXB collectively herein the "Owner". Recitals: A. The Owner owns the real property located in Wright County legally described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein ("Subject Property"). B. The Subject Property shall be assessed costs, fees and charges associated with the construction of Chelsea Road across and through the Subject Property ("Project"). The construction of said road benefits the Subject Property. C. The costs, fees and charges to be assessed against the Subject Property (the "Assessments") are set forth on Exhibit "B". Said amounts will be adjusted to actual costs incurred at the completion of the Project. NOW THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THE MUTUAL COVENANTS SET FORTH HEREIN, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. The Subject Property is hereby assessed by the City for the Assessments. The I . 106711v3 "•, -, iia '• "s,�'l�'Si.,�l7 Tree¢ 'Ale ivGO (�!Ii- IKPO4s, 6viN 55402 �il� �y - j4P total Assessments for the Otter Creel< portion of the Project are estimated at $2,419,154.00. 2. The final assessment amount shall be assessed against the Subject Property over a ten (10) year period accruing interest at the rate of 6.5% per annum, with interest to accrue as payment is made for the costs of the Project. 3. The Assessments shall be deemed adopted on the date this Agreement is signed by the City. The Owner, by signing this Agreement, acknowledges that all procedural and substantive objections to the Assessment are hereby waived unconditionally, such waiver includes any rights of Owner, its successor or assign to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessments exceed the benefit to the Subject Property. The Owner further waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to M.S.A. § 429.091. 4. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall be construed to give the Property Owner pre -approval of any development of the Subject Property. CITY OF MON, I[CELLO By. Bruce Thielen, Mayor By: U J/ Rick Wolfsteller, City Administrator STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF WRIGHT } They foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this --Xday of -, (�Fv�t)e per2004, by Bruce Thielen and Rick Wolfsteller, the Mayor and City Ad inistrator of the City of Monticello, a Minnesota municipal corporation pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. Notary Public ,WO -V~4» IaTTHE1N K. 131,EOKL T' Fi )TAl3Y FL'BLIC—tJ11NNL50TA iA. M Comm. Expires ian.31.2045 2 nn✓rvw�re ■vw 706711v3 A OTTER CREEK, LLC �, y By: f_.. `. C 1 .r It�,-/�fice President STATE OF MINNESOTA ) �g ) SS. COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this c..�$ day of }�. �r,i�.2004, by John E. Chadwick the Vice President of Otter Creek, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf pf the company. ��..� �J � i]CSi:%ti'i'V 'h `, l"r:• 4.ikftl�.i°id�1�!'�'H74.�?�11�1 Notary l�'ubltc f,.:s. 1CTf�RY P.J_ /"'1':c�- f.+ Comm sa n ct-uzs dar. 3I :tf•. C a utis s:. �;�.,•� � ,A �E�rts �sv„nnnWr:naF•i^��.� ❑ J. EDWIN CHADWICK, LLC /Yohn E. Chadwick r its: Chief Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) j� )SS. COUNTY SS - COUNTY OF Y"�>�a1a`\ti�a,�, � ) The :Foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this e -`-i day of '5-x- 2004, by John E. Chadwick the Chief Manager of J. Edwin Chadwick, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, ontalf ofjtlze company. <....1 �'f/ %Y'e', ��.!V",i:i'i+�:�:n'``sles,sv'a�•Ff:l ��`!JVr; <F��ix§J :o-'t!sJ�i; •f+ 6 �'%Ci�L '� ^i r�`�• -• v :�y STEVEN FI_Yi :1`� �. Notary ;'r :S�rclF�f�i:l4F'.f:fil's1 �tfaatlesir,JO�'Zfl 4:'i/�f1.^si:i ��u',/ia'J .. 3 706711 v3 JX BOWERS, LLC Its:'N nager'and',Vice President STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) SS. COUNTY OF WRIGHT } The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this c-;'61 day of `z'yr,l4,r:,`2004, by Taylor Perry Bowers the Manager and Vice President of J.X- Bowers, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability coral^any, oil. behalf of the company. Noy Pu 11c` u.,t�'Miror�;1,'•?��n�::rV•.nn r�nr:nnn.�.,•sa+rt%1h.+�nr :� r THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: Campbell Knutson Professional Association Suite 317 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, MN 55121 Telephone; (651) 452-5000 MKB 4 706711v3 EXHIBIT "A" to ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT DESCRIPTION OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY Costs are assessed against the following property owned by Otter Creek: Outlots C, D and Lot 1, Block 1, Otter Creek Crossing, according to the recorded plat thereof, Wright County, Minnesota. I aISS 3{yq ail. SCJ VAOYHD NVIIp3 I' 4 E3H dLflm1. �iffli �Yl 1� �1giEk�`�Fii 3iYP H aISS 3{yq ail. SCJ VAOYHD NVIIp3 I' tOnxs 11--- i3�aa.t d xa�rb aacio elM� G`V Sfi• J 4 E3H dLflm1. �iffli tOnxs 11--- i3�aa.t d xa�rb aacio elM� G`V Sfi• J �Yl 3iYP H tOnxs 11--- i3�aa.t d xa�rb aacio elM� G`V Sfi• J EXHIBIT "B" to ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT ASSESSMENTS Chelsea Road $1,855,000.00 Rask Property Acquisition of $1,148,468.00 (net) $ 810,111.00 Assuming purchases of excess by: Otter Creek 26,231@$5.00=$131,155.00 City 82,881@2.50=$207,202.50 90th Street/intersection Removal of Temporary Access Expenses for Prior Extensions Outlot A assessment (one-half) Extra Depth Sewer and Stub Acquisition on Sandberg Road Feasibility Report Total City Portion: 2015 FF Otter Creek Portion: 7650 FF(3835 x 2) Grand Total: Otter Greek 706711v3 $ 237,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 21,277.00 $ 52,484.00 $ 23,500.00 $ 60, 000.00 53,084,372.00 21% $ 647,718.00 79% $2,436,654.00 Credit ($ 17,500.00) $2,419,154.00 940. LS E • ,a 1 co H at q Lu 4D 0 Jg orn pW �m Q CA C N N 2 U Y N U Q1 00, yC to W x p m o Q a0 U J J N N 3 0 m X U J J Y U 3 v m J L E � m 3 Ow W -� J LO 0 Y a O o LU} > O 020 Ln M co LO CD LO CV d9 0 Y 36 Council Minutes: 11/13/06 S. Continuation of public hearine and adoption of assessment for improvements installed under the Chelsea Road Extension Proiect (90th Street to CSAH 39). Citv Proiect No. 2005-11C. Consulting engineer, Bret Weiss reviewed the information on this project noting the total project cost was $4,642,579.25. Under the terms of an assessment agreement, the Chadwick/Bowers development will be picking up 79% of the cost. The assessment agreement had called for an interest rate of 6.5% but the rate set forth on the assessment notice was 5.5% and they were requesting that the 5.5% be the rate used. Mayor Herbst opened the continued public hearing. John Chadwick 11430 Zion Circle, Bloomington spoke stating that this project opened an area of the City up for development and commended 011ie Koropchak on the good job she had done in getting land sold out there. He stated that he does have a 14 acre remnant parcel that needs to be rezoned and he would like to meet with the firm doing the comprehensive plan update to see what they are proposing for the area. Mayor Herbst then closed the public hearing. BRIAN STUMPF MOVED TO ADOPT THE ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE CHELSEA ROAD EXTENSION AT AN INTEREST RATE OF 5.5%. TOM PERRAULT SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 9. Public Hearine, and consideration of adoption of assessment roll for miscellaneous, accounts receivable (MARS). Finance Director, Rick Wolfsteller indicated that the amounts on the assessment roll were primarily related to blight clean up and brush chipping. There was one amount relating to unpaid costs for development. Glen Posusta suggested that they adopt the assessment roll without the parcel with the outstanding development fees. The City would then have an opportunity to resolve the issues in question. Rick Wolfsteller gave a brief explanation of the amounts charged. Mayor Herbst opened the public hearing. Gerald Paulson, 20201215 th Avenue, Big Lake owns the development property at 9749 Hart Boulevard. He stated the project was completed in May of 2005 and in June they received an invoice in the amount of $1300. At the time of the development application they had paid a deposit of $1,000. He noted what he believed was a duplication of fees in that the building plan review was charged on the building permit as well as in the development fee reconciliation. He also referenced a letter from the City stating that if this amount was not paid there would be an additional $50 charge. Glen Posusta stated that because this information had just been given to them at the meeting tonight, he wanted to adopt the assessment roll without this parcel on it. This would allow Council and staff to review the information and bring the assessment of this parcel back at the CrS COMMERCIAL REALTY SOLUTIONS www.commrealtysolutions.com Monticello - Commercial or Indu FOR SALE xxx Chelsea Road, Monticello, MN 5536 * Sales Price $3.00/PSF (Plus Assessments) * Appx. 28 Acre Parcel (Divisible) * Wright County PID 155-171-000030 (19.1 Acre) * 2017 Taxes $878.00 * Wright County PID 155.247.001030 (9.21 Acre) * 2018 Taxes - TBD * City incentives include TIF and Job Creation Credit * FiberNet Monticello is available * Near Restaurants and Major Retailers * Easy Access to I-94 and Highway 25 * Located on Chelsea Road (the primary interconnect for the interchanges) * Zoning is B-3 Regional Business or IBC -Industrial Business Camnnc 1,750' of I-94 Frontage 5t Francis "! 'V'MONTICELLO �arCreek Area andale •. ` Otsego Ramsey s Andover 5t Michael w k r Rapids �s Bwklyn Watertown 9 NPtnne�ora Landscape ,4rbore[urr� Park shvreview V1 �r rp Minneapolis L _ Hopkins Longfelkvw +' Edina Contact: WAYNE ELAM (763) 229-4982 WElam@commrealtysolutions.com The information contained herein was obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but Commercial Realty Solutions, LLC has not verified nor has any knowledge regarding the accuracy of information and makes no representation or warranty concerning the same. Therefore, Commercial Realty Solutions, LLC disclaims all liabilities in connection with any inaccuracies or incompleteness. Monticello - Commercial or Industrial FOR SALE xxx Chelsea Road, Monticello, MN 55362 Great Interstate Frontage Suburban Manufacturing crs COMMERCIAL REALTY SOLUTIONS www.commrealtysolutions.com Contact: WAYNE ELAM (763) 229-4982 Adjoining property Owner's Dahlheimer Distributing The information contained herein was obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but Commercial Realty Solutions, LLC has not verified nor has any knowledge regarding the accuracy of information and makes no representation or warranty concerning the same. Therefore, Commercial Realty Solutions, LLC disclaims all liabilities in connection with any inaccuracies or incompleteness. Monticello - Commercial or Industrial FOR SALE xxx Chelsea Road, Monticello, MN 55362 Monticello Demographics Demographics - 2015 Population Average Age Average Household Inc. Median Household Inc. a rr� 1 -Mile 6,523 17,185 36,142 38 39 40 $ 55,839 $ 55,039 $ 57,565 $ 50,781 $ 50,205 $ 52,978 Frontage wi High Visibili TRAFFIC COUNTS - 2017 * I-94 - 44,000 VPD * Highway 25 - 27,500 VPD * Chelsea Road - 3,900 VPD Contact: WAYNE ELAM (763) 229-4982 WElam(&commrealtvsolutions.com The information contained herein was obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but Commercial Realty Solutions, LLC has not verified nor has any knowledge regarding the accuracy of information and makes no representation or warranty concerning the same. Therefore, Commercial Realty Solutions, LLC disclaims all liabilities in connection with any inaccuracies or incompleteness. City Council Agenda 03/26/2018 2M. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2018-21 supporting House File 3708/Senate File 3504 for an additional regulatory option by which the Public Utilities Commission may consider investments made in the Monticello Nuclear Plant (JO) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Xcel Energy has contacted the City with a request to consider support for House File 3708/Senate File 3504. This legislation provides for an additional regulatory option by which the Public Utilities Commission may consider investments made in the Monticello Nuclear Plant. These bill are sponsored by Marion O'Neill in the Minnesota House of Representatives and by Bruce Anderson in the Minnesota Senate. The bill provides for qualifying an electric generation plan that utilizes nuclear power as a carbon reduction facility along with an associated mechanism for assuring that investments made in the nuclear facilities are eligible for recapture via electric usage fees. This bill is important because its application identifies nuclear power as a carbon free energy source and serves to enhance the financial viability of nuclear power within Xcel power source portfolio. Al. Budget Impact: None. A2. Staff Workload Impact: None. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: Motion to adopt Resolution 2018-21 supporting House File 3708/Senate File 3504 for an additional regulatory option by which the Public Utilities Commission may consider investments made in the Monticello Nuclear Plant. 2. Motion to deny. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends Alternative #1. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Resolution 2018-21 B. Copies of House File 3708 and Senate File 3504 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2018-21 RESOLUTION SUPPORTING HOUSE FILE 3708/SENATE FILE 3504 PROVIDING FOR AN ADDITIONAL REGULATORY OPTION BY WHICH THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION MAY CONSIDER INVESTMENTS MADE IN THE MONTICELLO NUCLEAR PLANT WHEREAS, the Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant (the Plant) is located in the City of Monticello; and WHEREAS, the Plant provides 671 megawatts of carbon -free baseload energy to the state; and WHEREAS, the Plant provides competitive pay and benefits to its 600 full-time employees, and an additional 800 employees during refueling outages; and WHEREAS, the Plant is a major contributor to the local property tax base and to the local economy; and WHEREAS, the Plant is licensed by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to operate through 2030; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Monticello City Council supports House File 3708/Senate File 3504, to provide an additional regulatory option by which the Public Utilities Commission may consider investments made in the plant. ADOPTED BY the Monticello City Council this 26th day of March, 2018. CITY OF MONTICELLO Brian Stumpf, Mayor ATTEST: Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator 03/06/18 REVISOR RSI/IL 18-6340 This Document can be made available in alternative formats upon request State of Minnesota HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES NINETIETH SESSION H. F. No. 3708 03/12/2018 Authored by O'Neill, Haley, Newberger, Rarick, Peppin and others The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Job Growth and Energy Affordability Policy and Finance 1.1 A bill for an act 1.2 relating to energy; establishing a carbon reduction facility designation for certain 1.3 large electric generating facilities; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota 1.4 Statutes, chapter 216B. 1.5 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA: 1.6 Section 1. [216B.1697] CARBON REDUCTION FACILITIES; NUCLEAR ENERGY. 1.7 Subdivision 1. Qualifying facility. A carbon reduction facility is an existing large electric 1.8 generating power plant that employs nuclear technology to generate electricity. 1.9 Subd. 2. Proposal submission. (a) A public utility may submit to the Public Utilities 1.10 Commission a proposal to designate a carbon reduction facility under this section. The 1.11 proposal must: 1.12 (1) demonstrate that the facility meets the requirements of subdivision 1; and 1.13 (2) include a proposed statement of the total expected costs, including but not limited 1.14 to capital investments and operation and maintenance costs associated with the facility's 1.15 operation. 1.16 (b) If the information submitted in the original proposal changes, a utility may at its sole 1.17 discretion and at any time file additional proposals for the same facility. 1.18 Subd. 3. Proposal approval. (a) The commission must approve or reject the proposed 1.19 facility designation and the total expected costs submitted by the public utility. The 1.20 commission must make a final determination on the petition within ten months of the filing 1.21 date. Section 1. 1 03/06/18 REVISOR RSI/IL 18-6340 2.1 (b) With respect to any carbon reduction facility, approval by the Public Utilities 2.2 Commission constitutes a finding of prudency for the proposal's total costs. The utility is 2.3 entitled to recover any documented costs that do not exceed the costs provided in the carbon 2.4 reduction facility designation proposal using the carbon reduction rider under subdivision 2.5 4 or a subsequent rate case. 2.6 (c) If additional proposals are filed for a single facility, the commission must treat each 2.7 proposal the same as an original proposal under this section. 2.8 Subd. 4. Carbon reduction rider. A public utility may annually petition the commission 2.9 to approve a carbon reduction rider to recover a qualifying facility's total costs outside of a 2.10 general rate case proceeding under section 216B.16. In the filing, the public utility must 2.11 describe the costs the public utility seeks for rider recovery. 2.12 Subd. 5. Rider approval. (a) The commission may approve, modify and approve, or 2.13 reject the proposed carbon reduction rider. 2.14 (b) The commission may approve a rider that: 2.15 (1) allows the utility to recover the facility's total costs; 2.16 (2) allows an appropriate return on investment associated with the facility; 2.17 (3) allocates appropriately between wholesale and retail customers; and 2.18 (4) recovers costs from retail customer classes in proportion to class energy consumption. Section 1. 2 4A. A. C. City Council Agenda 03/26/2018 Consideration of appointing a member of the Citv Council to serve on the Fire Department Ladder Truck Design Committee (JO) Several weeks ago the City Council authorized the Fire Department to begin the Ladder Truck Design process. However, the item was approved on consent and there was no discussion of appointing a member of the council to serve on the Ladder Truck Design Committee. Members of council have participated in previous apparatus purchases for the Fire Department, but there is no requirement for City Council to do so. Council is asked to revisit the topic to determine whether or not to assign a councilmember to the Committee and if so, a councilmember needs to be appointed. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Al. Budget Impact: None. A2. Staff Workload Impact: None. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: Motion to appoint to serve on the Fire Department Ladder Truck Design Committee. 2. Motion of no action. Under this alternative, the Ladder Truck Design Committee will bring the design to the City Council prior to initiating the purchasing process. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Council should appoint a member to the Ladder Truck Design Committee if so desired. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • None. City Council Agenda 03/26/18 4B. Consideration of approving a professional services agreement with Signature Lighting, Inc. for design services of proposed street lighting improvements along Chelsea Road, Washington Street, and the Downtown area and for the purchase of lights for the Fallon Avenue Overpass proiect at cost of $18,825 (SB/TM/JO) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND City Council is asked to consider selecting a vendor to assist staff in implementing installation of upcoming street lighting improvements. The City Council started implementing a City -owned street lighting program in 2006 with the intent to provide lighting along collector roadway and pedestrian corridors. This program supplemented previous practices of just lighting intersections, other high use areas, known dark areas, etc. Since that time the City has provided corridor lighting along School Boulevard, Cedar Street (from south of School Blvd to Chelsea Road), Chelsea Road (between Fallon Avenue and CSAH 18), E 7th Street (between Cedar Street and CSAH 18) and W 7th Street between Minnesota Street and Golf Course Road. Design, installation and maintenance of these systems were implemented through an agreement with the local electricity providers, either with Xcel Energy or Wright -Hennepin Electric. Xcel Energy has not provided outdoor lighting design and construction services for several years and most recently Wright -Hennepin Electric has terminated providing this service. This has left City staff with the need to explore other design service options for street lighting projects. As an option, Council could authorize staff to utilize Jon Olson, with Signature Lighting, for these professional design services. Jon was formerly with Xcel Energy's lighting department has worked with the City in the past on the School Boulevard project between TH 25 and Redford Lane in 2005. He provides his services to over 20 cities in the state. His services are described in the enclosed professional services agreement, which includes a menu of services the City can select depending on what is needed for each project. Jon has knowledge of different lighting systems to assist the City in determining standard light styles to implement moving forward in order to provide efficient and consistent lighting styles through the City. His consulting hourly rate is $85 per hour. If Council assigns the work to Olson, it would be selecting the vendor without going out for quotes which is not consistent with the purchasing policy. However, Council does have the authority to take action outside of the policy. Following are reasons why Council may wish to select the vendor directly. Tom Moores has had direct experience working with Olson and found that his work is has been exceptional. The consulting rate is very reasonable and number of hours on a project is predictable and containable. It is a specialized service that is not likely to yield a competitive proposal prop. To seek other proposals would take additional staff time and may not yield a result commensurate with the effort to seek alternatives. For reasons noted above one option is to utilize his services for the following street lighting projects identified for 2018: City Council Agenda 03/26/18 1. Downtown Project: This project consists of replacing approximately 40 light fixtures and painting light poles along Broadway Street between Locust Street and Cedar Street and along Walnut Street from Broadway Street to Yd Street. Jon will provide recommendations to the City for selecting a light fixture type and style and will assist the City in a quote process to select and purchase the light fixtures. He will also assist in the bid process, inspection and construction management for installation of the light fixtures. His estimated fee for this service is $2,550. 2. Fallon Avenue Overpass Project: The project plans include a design to install 3 different light styles for the bridge, roundabouts and street/pathway approaches. The City would directly purchase the light poles and fixtures. City staff would recommend having Jon review the lighting design and assist in the selection of light fixture to be utilized with the project. His estimated fee for this service is $1,275. 3. Chelsea Road and Washington Street: The Chelsea Road street reconstruction project (between TH 25 and Fallon Avenue) and installation of trail and sidewalks is scheduled for construction in 2018. It is timely to upgrade and enhance the street lighting system along the corridor this year. Currently Xcel Energy owns the street lights along the corridor and will remove them with the project. It is recommended that a City system be designed and constructed with a shoe -box LED style light similar to the City -owned lights along Chelsea Road between Fallon Avenue and CSAH 18. In addition, school district representatives have requested the City enhance the lighting system along Washington Street between Broadway Street and Fallon Avenue. It is recommended to utilize Jon Olson's services for design of these systems, light selection, providing cost estimates, bid specifications and inspection. WSB will draft the plans based on Jon's design and assist with the bid package preparation, bid tabulation and construction management services. Jon's estimate fee for this service is $15,000. As a second alternative, Council may consider authorizing staff to seek proposals. Council should select this option if more comfortable with sticking with purchasing policy guidance. It could be worth the effort to see if there are other vendors that have proven capability that can do the work at a lower cost. Either option could be evaluated positively in terms of stewardship of public funds. Alternative 1 will result in more efficient use of staff time and assign the work to a trusted vendor, but we will not know if the work could have been completed at a lower cost. Alternative 2 assures the City will get the best price for the service, but will require staff resources that may not be offset by the lower vendor price. Al. Budget Impact: The estimated hourly not -to -exceed cost for utilizing the professional services of Signature Lighting as described in this report is $18,825. Once light selection and design is completed, staff will bring the construction cost estimates back to Council for consideration to move forward with purchase and construction for the projects. The Downtown project was previously authorized by Council for 2018 construction at an estimated construction cost of $150,000. 2 City Council Agenda 03/26/18 Allocations from electric franchise fees agreement have funded the City's street lighting program. Approximately $130,000 is allocated each year for street lighting improvements through the electric franchise agreements. There is a sufficient balance in the Street Lighting Improvement Fund to cover this expenditure. Finance recommends maintaining a level of sustainable annual expenditures for street lighting improvements. A2. Staff Workload Impact: Engineering and Public Works staff will assist in managing the work. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS 1. Motion to approve a professional services agreement with Signature lighting, Inc. for design services of proposed street lighting improvements along Chelsea Road, Washington Street, Downtown area and for the purchase of lights for the Fallon Avenue Overpass project at cost of $18,825. 2. Motion to direct staff to seek proposals from other individuals or companies capable of providing needed service. 3. Motion to deny at this time. C. RECOMMENDATIONS There is no full staff consensus on this item for consideration which is the main reason why it is not on the consent agenda. Both options before the Council have merit. D. SUPPORTING DATA Signature Lighting Professional Services Agreement Street Lighting Project Map City of Monticello Attention: Shibani Bisson. PE 505 Walnut Street Monticello, MN 55362 March 21, 2018 Re: 2018 Professional Service's Agreement Dear Shibani, 18430 Krypton St NW Anoka, MN 55303 Signature Lighting Inc. and the City of Monticello, MN agree to enter into a Professional Service's Agreement that Signature Lighting, Inc. will provide services for the City of Monticello for the year 2018 to include the following services: • Provide recommendations for streetlight improvements for existing and new streetlight systems. • Provide technology information and options to enhance roadway lighting and reduce energy and maintenance costs. • Provide recommendations for City to purchase streetlight material consisting of poles, fixtures, mast arms, poles base covers etc. for projects within the city. • Provide construction recommendations and design services for new streetlight systems and reconstruction of existing streetlight systems to maximize lighting levels with the emphasis on reducing construction costs. • For Projects over $100,000.00 assist City with specification sheets on lighting projects (bid documents) as needed or requested. • For Projects under $1000,000.00 gather contractor quotes by: contacting qualified electrical contractors whom specialize in the construction and installation of quality streetlight systems. Hold site meetings with contractors to assure full understanding of design and construction elements and requirements. Provide contractor's with product specification information and provide design sketch and other data to assure complete understanding of project to promote a fair quote process. • Assist City with contractor names and their quotes. • Assist City with project management during construction of systems. • Assist City with inspection of completed systems to assure all installation requirements were met and that the system is fully operational. Fee Structure: Signature Lighting, Inc. will provide these services to the City of Monticello at $85.00 per hour with a not to exceed cost determined before each project begins. Billing for Services: Signature Lighting, Inc. will provide itemized billing reflecting hours spent on above services at the end of the project. Payment: City of Monticello, MN agrees to submit payment to Signature Lighting, Inc. within 30 days of receipt of invoice. Accepted by: Date: Signature: John K. Olson President Signature Lighting Inc. Accepted by: Date: Signature: Name: City of Monticello Title: 2018 Street Lighting Improvements March 20, 2018 o �L,,�, • y - • ---.` 0 0 - OM1`' Q ° ��.. 00 0 °��,► 00 000 0 ° o o Cb o o ° ,. o m o 00 ^ 0 0 ° ° o® ° -- o 0 o Qj 00 OOOo 0' O O ° _ O 00 Q .. d l O O -%a 00 -0.1 00 0 _ O ° -�... v O O q F' O O -. �. w . O •_ • _ _ `\ ® „�S A •, — ' J 0 IL o ® 00 �` e 0. 00 0 Y Q - C 0 �. 1 inch = 752 feet City Boundary - Xcel Energy CIl-YOF Montido . City Wright/Henne... Private Other Map Powered by DataLink from WSB & Associates Monticello Council Connection March 26, 2018 MCH Y OF ntfcdo COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT USDA Rural Residential Loan Programs In December 2017, the City of Monticello received a notice from the US Department of Agriculture that it was completing a review of eligible areas for its rural housing programs. The review requires that the USDA evaluate eligibility of a community to participate in its loan programs based on provisions of the 1999 Housing Act. The criteria relate directly to whether an area is rural or rural in character and outlines specific requirements to qualify as such. If a community no longer qualifies as rural or rural in character, the community is then no longer eligible for the USDA's homeownership loan programs. The two most common USDA home ownership loan programs are as follows: 1. Low interest, fixed-rate homeownership loans provided to qualified persons directly by USDA Rural Development. 2. Fixed -rates and term financing through a loan from a private financial institution and guaranteed by USDA Rural Development for qualified persons. City staff discussed the qualifications with a regional USDA representative and attended a conference call on February 6, 2018 with the USDA and other communities under review. While staff's understanding after hearing other comments and responses on the calls was that Monticello was likely to be removed from USDA rural development loan eligibility, staff received notice from the USDA on Friday_ , March 16th, 2018 that Monticello will remain eligible at the present time. Council should be aware that with the next round of eligibility review (which occurs every 5 years), Monticello will likely again be a candidate for removal from the program. In summary, the USDA Rural Development Loan programs are intended for homeowners in rural areas. At some point, Monticello will no longer fits that qualification based on the city limits and population density. CITY OF Montieffo DMV Transactions February 2018, the DMV processed 9,358 transaction 2,000 more than February 2017. DMV year to- date revenue is $122,740.25 an increase of $30,258.71 or 16.1% over the same period last year. Please see the following graphs for more detail. $60,000 $50,000 $40,000 $30,000 $20,000 $10,000 10,000 9,000 8,000 7,000 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 $140,000 $120,000 $100,000 $80,000 $60,000 $40,000 $20,000 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 DMV Revenue Comparison $50,185 $52,069 FeB 2011 FeB 2012 FeB 2013 FeB 2014 FeB 2015 FeB 2016 FeB 2017 FeB 2018 DMV Transaction Comparison FeB 2011 FeB 2012 FeB 2013 FeB 2014 FeB 2015 FeB 2016 FeB 2017 FeB 2018 DMV Year -to -Date Revenue Comparison $122,740 FeB 2011 FeB 2012 FeB 2013 FeB 2014 FeB 2015 FeB 2016 FeB 2017 FeB 2018 DMV Year -to -Date Transaction Comparison 20,237 FeB 2011 FeB 2012 FeB 2013 FeB 2014 FeB 2015 FeB 2016 FeB 2017 FeB 2018 CITY OF mo�ii�effo ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Recently Attended Meetings: • Attended Rotary Club Meeting —January 22, 2018 • Attended Rotary Club Meeting — January 29, 2018 • Attended Rotary Club Meeting — February 5, 2018 • Co -Lead Downtown Business/Property Owners Meeting Cornerstone Cafe - Feb. 12, 2018 Purpose of the meeting was to get feedback on potential EDA assistance programs such as a fagade improvement grant program, building renovation loan program and energy efficiency loan program. (1St of 2 Meetings) • Attended Rotary Club Meeting — February 19, 2018 Jim Thares presenter of Program — Overview of trip to South Korea in May 2017 • Meeting with Housing Developer — February 21, 2018 Review of concept proposal for vacant parcel at corner of Locust and Third Street. Also reviewed proposed financing structure and provided TIF application forms and guidelines. • Co -Lead Downtown Business/Property Owners Meeting Cornerstone Cafe - Feb. 26, 2018 Purpose of the meeting was to get feedback on potential EDA assistance programs such as a facade improvement grant program, building renovation loan program and energy efficiency loan program. (2"d of 2 Meetings) • Attended Rotary Club Meeting — March 5, 2018 • Attended Rotary Club Meeting — March 12, 2018 Co -presenter of Program with Angela; presented an overview of the Downtown Small Area Study goals and objectives and status of development prospects and EDA efforts. • Attended Chamber of Commerce Meeting — March 20, 2018 • Housing and/or Commercial Rehabilitation Program Feasibility Assessment At the February 14, 2018 EDA meeting, action was taken to authorize entering into a $1,000 contract with CMHP (Central Minnesota Housing Partnership), St. Cloud, MN to conduct a feasibility assessment of establishing a housing and commercial building rehabilitation program in targeted areas of the city. Council Connection - 03/26/18 Update of EDA Property Acquisitions in 2018 Residential Properties/Parcels Purpose of Acquisition 255 East Broadway Combine with adjacent EDA -owned site for potential residential or mixed-use redevelopment project. 224 East 41hStreet For potential Affordable Housing Development per demand needs identified in 2017 Housing Study. 103 Pine Street For redevelopment of commercial or vertical mixed use development as guided in Small Area Study plan. M04CH Y OF icello HI -WAY LIQUORS Sales through February 28, 2018 Attached is the data for total sales in each major category through the end of February 2018. Hi -Way Liquors Sales Report 2/28/2018 Total Sales Month 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 CYM-LYM Jan $ 249,670.43 $ 316,280.10 $ 300,631.85 $ 296,838.64 $ 302,114.52 $ 328,004.13 $ 355,029.76 $ 380,425.45 $ 364,675.32 $ 356,295.18 $ 403,520.92 13.3% Feb 255,440.36 284,988.38 285,584.50 315,239.00 307,385.41 337,923.99 333,487.18 347,777.77 362,746.98 364,836.39 390,050.52 6.9% Mar 295,257.14 318,050.39 324,062.21 335,032.60 388,195.21 408,071.17 377,391.62 388,003.16 401,256.91 417,005.50 - Apr 281,365.81 346,738.34 369,112.88 389,543.24 347,321.09 388,395.50 389,250.82 421,280.89 428,729.44 448,141.63 May 377,177.10 384,337.08 399,489.67 409,309.12 433,829.01 436,195.21 498,095.67 523,401.05 482,917.95 503,867.81 Jun 350,727.93 381,782.23 377,458.15 409,726.07 461,423.68 440,255.04 426,392.73 474,203.81 470,585.33 521,559.76 Jul 409,870.50 430,838.23 466,122.69 466,738.15 447,452.18 485,459.76 479,174.06 542,973.27 527,519.46 563,935.31 Aug 409,575.96 383,523.07 386,245.30 408,734.83 445,158.94 503,181.84 484,955.71 470,505.22 462,669.36 497,201.21 Sep 317,846.07 346,900.80 346,557.62 373,719.64 390,399.33 379,381.19 397,495.82 439,444.29 448,218.93 501,126.67 Oct 351,268.98 360,742.04 375,367.40 365,702.14 372,676.23 396,328.87 409,967.74 460,096.82 454,442.30 461,549.38 Nov 332,605.88 341,875.49 360,661.96 376,855.40 421,960.12 424,038.37 465,299.53 474,241.74 444,533.08 495,519.24 Dec 436,379.03 454,982.63 485,617.01 505,482.70 527,865.36 518,379.58 549,200.76 569,707.38 605,509.16 629,143.57 - Total $ 4,067,185.19 $ 4,351,038.78 $ 4,476,911.24 $ 4,652,921.53 $ 4,845,781.08 $ 5,045,614.65 $ 5,165,741.40 $ 5,492,060.85 $ 5,453,804.22 $ 5,760,181.65 $ 793,571.44 Change $ 283,853.59 $ 125,872.46 $ 176,010.29 $ 192,859.55 $ 199,833.57 $ 120,126.75 $ 326,319.45 $ (38,256.63) $ 306,377.43 $ (4,966,610.21) Change % 7.0% 2.9% 3.9% 4.1% 4.1% 2.4% 6.3% -0.7% 5.6% -86.2% $700,000 $600,000 $500,000 $400,000 — $300,000 — $200,000 $100,000 Jan Feb Mar Monthly Hi -Way Sales Apr May Jun Jul Aug 111 Sep Oct Nov Dec ■ 2008 ■ 2009 ■ 2010 ■ 2011 ■ 2012 ■ 2013 ■ 2014 ■ 2015 ■ 2017 ■ 2018 Y -T -D 13.3% 10.0% Hi -Way Liquors Sales Report 2/28/2018 Beer Month 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 CYM-LYM Jan $ 122,218.36 $ 157,849.78 $ 146,246.32 $ 143,906.08 $ 149,406.45 $ 160,903.32 $ 173,814.13 $ 191,370.26 $ 176,483.68 $ 174,846.99 $ 198,202.11 13.4% Feb 121,734.33 137,055.23 140,624.54 150,075.08 150,589.28 162,865.75 161,168.63 164,508.11 175,055.27 179,346.12 187,042.58 4.3% Mar 138,889.05 155,196.13 164,157.70 163,595.55 203,957.25 192,607.52 185,325.68 192,955.79 199,141.66 208,926.70 - Apr 146,613.65 178,834.20 189,978.23 194,504.16 179,486.77 186,134.31 198,195.77 219,756.39 228,133.10 234,069.51 May 201,232.14 210,097.48 223,678.47 208,963.65 227,664.73 234,738.30 256,188.77 259,306.91 250,403.11 262,275.25 Jun 193,801.97 207,793.83 206,043.42 224,769.03 259,671.21 243,389.79 238,322.11 263,421.95 263,264.15 296,531.85 Jul 226,317.96 229,199.79 260,971.50 258,734.60 253,648.64 273,319.54 265,555.32 301,867.65 296,513.68 315,848.83 Aug 226,653.65 203,222.86 211,996.32 216,546.53 242,179.20 281,577.25 267,802.95 253,141.21 250,255.41 268,173.42 Sep 166,679.60 183,586.32 183,865.70 199,170.24 208,974.88 202,213.80 211,854.94 233,215.56 238,333.55 270,898.13 Oct 176,382.34 179,873.10 190,893.27 180,043.06 187,386.57 191,764.20 210,454.13 234,882.09 224,253.93 228,484.62 Nov 158,322.50 154,584.13 168,265.14 171,866.27 195,276.37 192,162.71 202,081.91 207,055.40 213,333.23 222,993.99 Dec 187,691.06 190,655.19 203,080.13 216,560.71 224,952.83 217,491.21 234,178.12 241,996.27 253,223.11 271,457.72 - Total $ 2,066,536.61 $ 2,187,948.04 $ 2,289,800.74 $ 2,328,734.96 $ 2,483,194.18 $ 2,539,167.70 $ 2,604,942.46 $ 2,763,477.59 $ 2,768,393.88 $ 2,933,853.13 $ 385,244.69 Change $ 121,411.43 $ 101,852.70 $ 38,934.22 $ 154,459.22 $ 55,973.52 $ 65,774.76 $ 158,535.13 $ 4,916.29 $ 165,459.25 $ (2,548,608.44) Change % 5.9% 4.7% 1.7% 6.6% 2.3% 2.6% 6.1% 0.2% 6.0% -86.9% $350,000 $300,000 $250,000 $200,000 $150,000 $100,000 $50,000 Jan Feb 11 Mar Monthly Beer Sales Apr May Jun ■ 2008 ■ 2009 ■ 2010 ■ 2011 ■ 2012 ■ 2013 ■ 2014 ■ 2015 ■ 2017 Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 02018 Y -T -D 13.4% 8.8% Hi -Way Liquors Sales Report 2/28/2018 Liquor Month 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 CYM-LYM Jan $ 73,930.87 $ 92,370.42 $ 91,472.50 $ 91,279.01 $ 93,085.69 $ 103,977.89 $ 113,943.25 $ 118,577.85 $ 118,211.20 $ 114,509.99 $ 133,589.33 16.7% Feb 74,261.89 83,513.27 85,484.92 96,541.21 92,489.93 106,387.16 107,609.55 112,198.85 113,060.59 117,361.15 128,952.50 9.9% Mar 78,870.42 88,569.65 93,133.42 101,047.04 112,244.43 124,487.55 116,316.49 118,269.49 118,839.79 131,238.09 - Apr 76,735.80 90,627.19 95,025.54 110,898.81 98,080.67 113,594.37 115,579.47 123,841.34 126,073.89 130,114.53 May 103,409.29 102,041.75 106,395.62 111,586.59 114,299.35 127,622.31 135,370.38 140,116.66 129,009.36 142,237.28 Jun 91,805.81 103,580.02 102,086.20 115,136.72 128,604.32 124,019.90 120,291.71 136,716.81 135,763.26 147,813.59 Jul 105,782.85 118,883.98 122,861.98 130,624.19 123,672.73 139,270.04 139,967.77 155,436.54 150,173.35 160,220.37 Aug 106,489.25 103,977.01 101,487.43 113,869.37 126,065.14 141,197.73 138,660.76 136,440.40 135,841.14 144,263.78 Sep 88,448.34 94,335.50 94,528.17 103,373.64 109,153.56 107,605.71 115,119.19 129,195.42 130,101.01 143,252.37 Oct 97,046.60 102,236.90 102,983.14 103,533.14 106,326.73 116,677.74 124,271.15 140,198.97 128,290.50 145,864.34 Nov 97,348.39 90,996.73 102,298.02 105,501.75 120,127.29 126,412.24 134,241.85 132,261.11 134,208.12 149,468.96 Dec 135,221.23 143,684.12 153,690.60 159,717.50 172,370.96 175,523.36 184,746.26 190,944.24 205,335.83 213,217.73 - Total $ 1,129,350.74 $ 1,214,816.54 $ 1,251,447.54 $ 1,343,108.97 $ 1,396,520.80 $ 1,506,776.00 $ 1,546,117.83 $ 1,634,197.68 $ 1,624,908.04 $ 1,739,562.18 $ 262,541.83 Change $ 85,465.80 $ 36,631.00 $ 91,661.43 $ 53,411.82 $ 110,255.21 $ 39,341.83 $ 88,079.85 $ (9,289.64) $ 114,654.14 $ (1,477,020.35) Change % 7.6% 3.0% 7.3% 4.0% 7.9% 2.6% 5.7% -0.6% 7.1% -84.9% Monthly Liquor Sales $250,000 $200,000 $150,000 $100,000 r� $50,000 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec ■ 2008 ■ 2009 ■ 2010 ■ 2011 ■ 2012 ■ 2013 ■ 2014 ■ 2015 ■ 2017 ■ 2018 Y -T -D 16.7% 13.2% Hi -Way Liquors Sales Report 2/28/2018 Wine Month 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 CYM-LYM Y -T -D Jan $ 30,700.42 $ 41,810.19 $ 43,324.18 $ 48,437.59 $ 50,238.83 $ 54,949.83 $ 59,391.16 $ 61,128.65 $ 60,454.56 $ 57,275.16 $ 60,047.20 4.8% 4.8% Feb 33,407.17 39,410.85 42,230.84 52,847.05 54,642.27 60,573.12 57,228.51 62,600.47 64,797.38 58,664.45 62,027.36 5.7% 5.3% Mar 47,603.93 45,525.38 46,165.18 54,639.16 57,735.22 77,810.58 66,425.24 67,121.51 71,840.82 64,286.75 - Apr 31,755.42 48,303.48 61,146.04 62,289.18 57,973.74 79,736.19 63,101.05 63,285.56 61,268.24 69,415.79 May 38,522.75 40,963.86 45,733.08 68,701.95 78,740.40 62,491.07 92,083.62 109,512.94 87,333.35 82,724.29 Jun 31,796.95 37,522.00 44,211.14 49,089.65 56,607.74 59,523.15 54,270.56 59,036.14 54,889.39 58,623.08 Jul 36,909.44 41,813.65 48,334.93 49,664.45 54,467.20 57,115.44 57,743.98 66,029.11 60,750.62 64,034.24 Aug 35,932.62 41,333.00 46,871.28 53,172.68 61,825.30 64,057.61 62,446.04 63,546.01 60,015.78 66,304.12 Sep 33,830.69 39,798.20 47,859.52 53,916.37 60,317.17 59,121.12 59,409.30 62,210.27 65,294.31 68,220.79 Oct 45,750.04 48,422.79 58,081.87 60,949.40 66,423.82 75,606.28 63,659.41 70,038.32 89,005.29 70,516.61 Nov 50,106.64 66,331.86 71,928.30 85,933.28 97,249.52 96,824.40 117,402.23 122,947.90 83,896.45 109,969.88 Dec 75,866.80 84,285.84 101,676.19 109,267.01 116,610.70 113,008.24 115,617.50 120,274.96 129,536.28 124,115.79 - Total $ 492,182.87 $ 575,521.10 $ 657,562.55 $ 748,907.77 $ 812,831.91 $ 860,817.03 $ 868,778.60 $ 927,731.84 $ 889,082.47 $ 894,150.95 $ 122,074.56 Change $ 83,338.23 $ 82,041.45 $ 91,345.22 $ 63,924.14 $ 47,985.12 $ 7,961.57 $ 58,953.24 $ (38,649.37) $ 5,068.48 $ (772,076.39) Change % 16.9% 14.3% 13.9% 8.5% 5.9% 0.9% 6.8% -4.2% 0.6% -86.3% $140,000 $120,000 $100,000 $80,000 $60,000 $40,000 $20,000 Jan Feb ki I Mar Monthly Wine Sales Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct ■ 2008 ■ 2009 ■ 2010 ■ 2011 ■ 2012 ■ 2013 ■ 2014 ■ 2015 ■ 2017 ■ 2018 Nov Dec Liquor Store Sales - Rolling 12 Month Periods $6.0 $5.5 $5.0 c $4.5 - — — $4.0 $3.5 $3.0 lD O N N W A V1 01 V � CH Y OF Monticello MONTICELLO COMMUNITY CENTER (MCC) Transactions and Visits Year to date (02.28.18), the MCC processed 16,326 transactions in the month of February compared to 23,138 transactions last February. The MCC year to date revenue is $241,522, a decrease of $20,974 from the same time last year. Year to date membership visits are 29,062 compared to 30,629 last year and MCC memberships are at a total of 6,129 active members compared to 4,730 at the same time last year. 7000 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 MCC 2/28 Members 0 201 0 201 0 201 Council Connection - 03/26/18 MCC 2/28 YTD Revenue $300,000 $250,000 $200,000 $150,000 $100,000 $50,000 ■ 2016 ■ 2017 ■ 2018 MCC 2/28 YTD Activity 35000 30000 25000 20000 15000 10000 5000 0 YTD Transactions YTD Member Visits ■ 2016 ■ 2017 ■ 2018 Monticello REVENUE & EXPENSE STATEMENT February 2018 1 1 YR -TO -DATE 2018 2418 �_� 2018 20,121 FULLYEAR Td -DATE February 5,279 BUDGET BUDGET 1 1 BALANCE REVENUE 504 - 12,547 ROOM RENTAL 96,000 16,000 2,982 ROOM RENTAL INTERNAL USE 55,000 9,167 1 _� 1 4,583 PARTY ROOIw1 RENTAL 25,000 4,167 2,301 IWEOOING RENTALS 29,000 4,833 _� 2,215 CHAPEL RENTAL 2,000 333_� 1,291 FACILITIES LEASE - - 388 (CONCESSIONS 70,700 11,783 �_� _� 7,181 (VENDING COMMIREFUN❑ 1,200 200 87 MEMBERSHIPSIOAILY 945,000 157,500 _� 66,505 USER FEES 52,000 8,667 _� 23,006 PROGRAM FEES 136,500 22,750 _� 7,940 FARMERS' MARKET FEES 2,500 4171 1 193 (CONTRIBUTIONS 2,000 3331 2,376 IMISC REVENUE 4,600 7671 418 (INTEREST 2,000 3331 - ITOTAL REVENUEBEFORE TAXES ' 1,423,500 237,2501 r 121,465 (TAXES 387,000 387,0661 - OPERATING TRANSFER IN - - - TOTAL REVENUE 118101506 624,250 _ 121,465 (EXPENSES 100.0%1 I_I 154 0 SALARIES -FULL TIME 439,177 73,1961 _ 1 31,523 SALARIES -PARTTIME 473,178 78.8631 1 35,973 EM PLOYEE TAXES I BEN EFITS 252,606 42.1011 1 16,662 SUPPLIES -OFFICE 56,300 9.3831 1 3,801 SUPPLIES - BUILDING 24,000 4,0001 1 2,900 SUPPLIES- RECREATION 6,850 1,1421 1 900 SUPPLIES -CONCESSIONS 45,250 7,5421 1 3,901 SUPPLIES-REPAIRSIMAINTENANCE 27,300 4,5501 1 1,953 SUPPLIES - OTHER 22,500 3,7501 1 1,572 PROFSERVICES -ITIDATATECH 58,318 9,7261 3,749 PROF SERVICES- RECREATION 3,000 500 - PROF SERVICES- CLEAN I N GIMAJ NIT 43,160 7.1931 1 - PROF SERVICES- MARKETING 1,500 256 1 1 290 PROF SERVICES- UTILITIES 189,200 31,5331 6,488 PROF SERVICES- INSURANCE 14,066 2,3-04 _1 - PROF SERVICES- OTHER 36,100 5,017 1 1 6,606 REPAIRS 120,300 20,050 48 (RENTALS 2,900 4831_1 _ - BANK CHARGES 20,000 3,333 1 1 1,633 CAPITAL OUTLAY 246,000 41,0001 1 - OTHER MISC EXPENDITURES 3,795 6331 1 475 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT - - TOTAL EXPENSES 2,079,500 346,583 1 1 118,468 INET (269,000) II 277,6671_1 21998 IWithoutTaxes (656,000) (109,333)1 1 21998 Community 2018 1 1 2417 YR -TO -DATE YR -TO -DATE BALANCE 1 1 BALANCE 7,591 20,121 9.167 1 1 9,167 4,156 5,279 2,429 4,044 1,697 - 504 - 12,547 15,588 161 321 132,244 186,320 55,970 10,433 11,167 9,202 766 - 2,376 1 1 - 748 1 1 2,021 241,522 1 - r 262,496 ' - - I 241,5n 1 I 1 262,496 55.6531 1 118,187 58,8521 - 39,932 1 1 44,505 3,944 1 1 4,216 3,041 3,416 936 1 1 1,037 6,656 1 1 6,595 3,424 4,751 1,5721 1 - 7.3451 1 7,113 - 1 1 280 296 1 1 290 18,841 1 1 30,653 8,265 1 1 9,040 6,991 1 1 8,928 48 1 1 721 3, 647 - 3,592 - 31,978 479 1 1 514 219,249 1 1 - 275,816 II 22;2731 1 (131320} 22,2731 1 (131326} Center: Year to Date 2417 1 YEAR END 1 ACTUAL 1 I 88,247 1 55,000 1 18,205 1 36,224 1 1,533 1 - I 67,a24 1 899 1 898,255 1 47,610 1 149,821 1 2,599 1 15,870 1 11.316 I 1,392,963 372,006 1,764,963 858,228 219,058 46,249 25,127 10,600 39,890 28,427 7,624 56,177 3,870 1,209 154,719 15,441 126,232 120,457 55 17,510 161,418 7,252 1,893,541 (128,638) (566,638) TO -DATE 1 TOTAL 1 (764) ■ BUDGET 58,153 10 BUDGET 1 VARIANCE 1 VARIANCE 1 8,409 0 � 52.6%1 I 88,409 10 6 0 0 0%1 45,833 10 11 0 03%1 20,844 10 2,405 0 49.8%1 26,571 10 (1 364) 0 -40,91%1 30310 (504) 1 (504)1 (764) ■ -6.5%1 58,153 10 39 197%1 1,039 IQ 25,256 0 16.0%1 812,756 10 (47,303) 0 -545.8%1 (3,970)10 11,583 0 509%1 125,33310 (349) 0 -Z3.8%1 1,73-410 (2,043) 0 -612.8%1 (376)10 18 f} 24%1 3,85210 333 Q 140.0%1 2,000 10 44,272) r 1,181,978 I 387,066 q 1000%1 387,600 10 382,7281 1�1 1,568,978 1 17,543 0 24 05b1 I 383,524 10 20,011 0 254%1 414,32610 2,169 0 5.2%1 212,67410 5,439 0 530%1 52,356 10 959 0 24.0%1 20,959 10 206 0 18.09fo1 5,91410 1,491 0 19,3%1 39,200 10 1,126 1 24.7%1 2a.876 10 2,178 0 58.1%1 20,928 10 2,374 0 244%1 50,97310 500 0 100.0%1 3,000 10 7,193 0 1000%1 43,160 10 (40)@ -160%1 1,210 10 12,693 1 40.3%1 170,359 10 (5,861) 4 -2500%1 5,861 10 (1,974)4 -394%1 23,10910 20,002 0 99.8%1 120,25210 483 0 1000%1 2,900 10 (al 3) 0 -9.4%1 16,353 10 41,000 0 100.0%1 246,000 10 154 0 243%1 3,316 10 127,334 1 1,860,251 1 255,393 I 1 I (291,273)1 ji _ 1 (678.273)1 8.9% Greater than 10% positive variance 0 0% , i Less than 10% variance 0 0% 0 Greater than 10% negative variance 8.3% -632% -1.1% 33% 2.7% -91.4% 85% -14.4% -102.1% 04% 16.7% 1000% 4% 4% 1% 10% 4% 3% 3% 4% 10% 4% 17% 17% -3% 7% -42% -7% 17% 17% -2% 17% 4% 7�CH Y OF %ntfcdo PARKS DEPARTMENT Staff is working on the following tasks listed below: • Chipping requests • Cemetery; selling and locating graves • Locating Riverside grave lot pins • Equipment/vehicle repairs • Park rental setups • Routine building maintenance • Winter equipment changeover • Sliding Hill inspections • BCOL dock Repairs • Snow removal • Dock repair floats and railing Updates: • Riverside Cemetery: Staff is currently drafting designs for a new Ossuarium cremation site. Staff will be doing a future special cemetery meeting with council. • BCOL: Staff is currently working with WSB on plans and specs. • City Hall: Staff is currently working on improvements at the front counter of city hall. • Arts Initiative: Staff is assembling information from the new Creative Arts Consultant to help development the new downtown arts initiative in Monticello. • Spring Tree Orders: 2018 has been the most successful tree program to date in regard to the quantity of trees ordered. SEWER & WATER DEPARTMENT The Sewer & Water Department has been working on the following items: • Well #4 back on line March 16 by replacing pump. • Pull Well #1 and High booster pump #1 at reservoir. • Installing Neptune radio reading units, so far this year we have installed over 200 units. • Had to pull south pump at Meadow Oaks lift station to replace bottom seal and bearings. • Locating utility for the City projects. • Check accounts with low/ high water usage. Council Connection - 03/26/18 Upcoming schedule for the next couple of months: • Read water meters April 1. • Starting April 9 clean and inspect .800 MG water tower. • Starting April 16 clean and inspect 1 MG water tower, we have to do mirror repairs to the inside of take. • Starting April 23 start flushing water mains starting in the east end of town working west, should be done first part of May. • Starting April 26 start cleaning, inspecting, calibrating, maintenance on pumps and generators on all seven (7) lift stations. • Starting June 4 start cleaning main line sanitary sewers in the northwest Quadrant. • On June 4 start exercising main line water valves in the northwest quadrant. STREET DEPARTMENT Shop: The shop has been busy doing normal maintenance on equipment and vehicles with other repairs as listed: MAINTENANCE REPORT February — March 2018 VEHICLE # BRIEF DESCRIPTION 117 REBUILD/MODIFY SNOW PUSHER 103 (REPAIR HOSE & FIX OIL LEAK 116 (REPAIR TAIL LIGHT 110 REPLACE WATER PUMP 107 REPLACE ALT, REPLACE WING CUTTING EDGE 230 REPLACE ORING 0 REPAIR CHAIN SAW 110 REPAIR REAR YELLOW STROBE LIGHT - DRIVER SIDE 113 (REPLACE BATTERY - CHECK OVER 551 SERVICE 222 REPLACE MAIN PTO DRIVESHAFT, REPAIR CROSSMEMBER 117 REPURPOSE/ENCLOSE TOP SNOW PUSHER 168 SERVICE 119 RECORE RADIATOR 104 iREPAIR FUEL CAP 179 SERVICE Council Connection - 03/26/18 MAINTENANCE REPORT February— March 2018 VEHICLE # BRIEF DESCRIPTION 150 SERVICE, DOT 150 SERVICE, REPLACE PICK UP HEAD CURTAINS, TURN HOSES Streets: • Sign maintenance • Boulevard tree trimming in the SE Quad • Spot street sweeping depending on temperatures • Spring banners have been placed along TH 25 and Walnut Street Stormwater • We have been doing winter maintenance in some of our stormwater ponds Snow Removal • Received 6.5" of snow this past month and dispatched all units once and partial units twice for snow removal. Total snow to date for the season is 38 inches. CSAH 39 Project Summary Wright County is in the process of developing a new County Road Safety Plan and the CSAH 39 Corridor from Monticello to Otsego was recently discussed at Wright County's safety workshop. The previous County Road Safety Plan is out of date and many of the projects have now been completed. The county is currently between plans as the new one will not be complete until the spring of 2018, however safety improvements along the CSAH 39 corridor have been and continue to be a high priority. The ADT along the 10.5 mile section of CSAH 39 ranges from 6,900-12,500 along the corridor from Monticello on the west end of the road segment east to Otsego near the intersection of CSAH 42. CSAH 39 is currently a rural design with 12 ft. driving lanes and an 8 ft. shoulder. There are 27 right turn lanes that would require widening to accommodate. In addition, there are many residential driveways which have access along this corridor, averaging 17 driveway accesses per mile. Project sheets from the upcoming safety plan are included in this submittal. Crash history along this corridor shows the crash rate is almost 3 times greater than the expected crash rate and the total crash rate is greater than the critical crash rate. The most common types of severe crashes are head-on, year- end and left -turn. CSAH 39 Crash History CSAH 39 Expected Critical 0.82 0.28 0.33 Proposed project plans include widening to maintain right turn lanes, a thin overlay over the entire roadway width to address deficient pavement thickness on the shoulders that will now carry mainline traffic and to cover existing pavement markings and restriping to include a 10 ft. continuous Two -Way Left -Turn Lane buffer (TWLTL) along the length of the corridor. Traffic volumes in excess of 6,000 vpd warrant consideration of a TWLTL on a two-lane facility. In addition, removing left turning vehicles from the through lanes due to the density of driveways can reduce delay to through vehicles and lead to a reduction in rear -end and sideswipe collisions. The TWLTL will also provide spatial separation between opposing lanes of traffic, which can lead to a reduction in head-on collisions. Estimated project costs Option A Thin overlay @ $100,000/mile = $1,000,000 Widening for turn lanes $420,000 Striping/Pvmt Msgs =$30,000 Estimated Project total: $1,450,000 Minnesota Department of Transportation District 3 3725 12th Street North Saint Cloud, MN 56303 December 30, 2015 Bill Cordell Senior Traffic Technician Wright County Public Works 1901 Highway 25 North Buffalo, MN 55313 Re: Speed Study C.S.A.H. 39 Dear Mr. Cordell Tel: 320-223-6500 Fax: 320-223-6581 Toll Free: 1-800-657-3961 As requested, an engineering and traffic investigation has been completed to detennine the safe and reasonable speeds on C.S.A.H. 39 between C.S.A.H. 75 and T.H. 101 for a distance of approximately 10.39 miles. No change in the authorized 45, 50 and 55 mph speed limits are recommended at this time. This recommendation is based upon a field review in November and December of 2015. Our recent study consisted of a general review of the area, speed checks, several test drives, and the crash history. Speed checks were taken during off peak hours with free flowing vehicles. One check taken in the 50 mph zone near Highway 101 between Page Ave and Parell Cr show 85% speeds of 58 mph with 10 mph paces of 49-58 and 50-59 mph. The second check taken 315 feet east of River Mill Drive shows 85% speeds of 50 mph with 10 mph paces of 44-53 and 43-52 mph. The documented speeds would seem to indication the existing posting are proper for the area. In addition test drives conducted at 5 mph increments along the entire roadway confirm the existing postings are reasonable as authorized. The above speed limits are recommended contingent upon curves and hazards being signed with the appropriate warning signs, including appropriate speed advisory plates. The roadway should be reviewed for traffic control devices impacted by the recommended speed limits before posting the signs. All signs shall be in conformance with the MMUTCD. The above speed limits are based on the roadway conditions on the date of the recommendation. If there are questions, please feel free to contact either Dave Totzke (230-223-6543) or myself (320-223-6540) at the above address. Sincerely, Thomas L. Dumont District Traffic Engineer CC: file An Equal Opportunity Employer Cl 0 0 0 0 a O 0 C 0 R R I D 0 R The 2018 Legislative Session is off to an exciting start Join Our Mailinq List for the 194 West Corridor Coalition! On March 1, House File 3174 was introduced, read, and referred to the Transportation Finance Committee. [ j : j Like us on Faeebouk The bill, authored by Representative Knoblach, Representative Theis, and Representative O'Neill, proposes that a feasibility study for expanding or Follow us on reconstructing 1-94 from St. Michael to St. Cloud be provided funding and have money appropriated. 1-94 was also mentioned during a House Floor Session Michael on Thursday, February 22 by Representative O'Neill. While discussing monetary discrepancies and I optimistic' for 1-94 overspending in regards to various state contracts, expansion funding Representative O'Neill made it clear that these monetary discrepancies and overspending are important to look Press & News into, as this is money that the state could be spending March 15, 2018 on other important issues. Stating that "for anyone who thinks that $29 million is not a big deal, I want to ask you what road could you fix in your district for $29 million? I The St. Michael City know what road I would fix in my district. 1-94 could go a Administrator who also long way with $29 million." and "MMB and Unions chairs the I-94 Corridor overspent by $142 million. If you think that is Coalition is optimistic insignificant, think about what road could get done with that. I know what road could get done with that. You that the lane expansion could expand 1-94 all the way from Rogers to St. Cloud of Interstate 94 and still have money left over." between Hwy. 241 in St. Michael and County Though a robust transportation bill was passed last year, Rd. 19 in Albertville will transportation is still expected to be a hot topic during score well for state the 2018 Session, with 1-94 being a key player. funding. Visit the 1-94 West Corridor Steve Bot said the Coalition Website! project's design phase was already funded Our website will allow for us to share recent accomplishments through the state's and exciting future updates with visitors. The mobile and Corridors for desktop friendly site includes changes to content, images, Commerce, the same navigation, the addition of new features and our new slogan program which will now "Unleash the Mobility". decide the fate for the Please visit our website to learn more about the Coalition and project's construction. lane expansion project at greenliaht94.com! 241 interchange and Check out our Facebook and Twitter Pages! Visit our website at rg eenli_pht94.com! The project would also construct an eastbound collector -distributor GREEN road system at 1-94 from County Rd. 19 to County Rd. 37, LIGHTfe",, essentially the same system that is currently in place on westbound 1-94. This would allow full interchange movement of 1-94 at County Rd. 19. Read Full Article I-94 West Corridor Coalition, PO Box 95, Rogers, MN 55374 SafeUnsubscribeTM Jeff.oneillCcbci.monticello.mn.us Forward email I Update Profile I About our service provider "We applied (this About the 1-94 Coalition project) for the Corridors," Bot said. The Minnesota 1-94 West Corridor Coalition is a coalition of "There will be $200 dedicated local governments, private businesses, local million available for the Chambers of Commerce and other stakeholders affected by next four years. We're the transportation challenges facing Minnesota. looking at $50 million to To have notice of traffic changes and other important project reconstruct the Hwy. information sent to your inbox, subscribe to the project's email 241 interchange and updates at mndot.aov/03 04/. For real-time travel information expand six lanes to anywhere in Minnesota, visit vyww.511 mn.orq. County Rd. 37." Check out our Facebook and Twitter Pages! Visit our website at rg eenli_pht94.com! The project would also construct an eastbound collector -distributor GREEN road system at 1-94 from County Rd. 19 to County Rd. 37, LIGHTfe",, essentially the same system that is currently in place on westbound 1-94. This would allow full interchange movement of 1-94 at County Rd. 19. Read Full Article I-94 West Corridor Coalition, PO Box 95, Rogers, MN 55374 SafeUnsubscribeTM Jeff.oneillCcbci.monticello.mn.us Forward email I Update Profile I About our service provider