Parks Commission Agenda Packet 05-15-1997
.
.
...
2.
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING. PARKS COMMISSION
Thursday, May 15, 1997 . 4:30 p.m.
1.
Call meeting to order.
Consideration of approving the minutes for the regular meeting April 18,
1997.
3.
Add items to agenda.
4.
Cardinal Hills 6th Addition Pilot Project/Tony Rieger-Borer
5.
Review concepts for developing Tree Preservation and Planting Ordinance.
Steve Grittman, City Planner, will be present to review concepts of
development of a tree preservation ordinance and companion
regulations governing tree planting in new subdivisions.
6.
Review Prairie Park Progress - J effJW anda
Management plan
Freeway Park Building - update Roger - 4 P ()rove cI bu. fef..... ~ if 10 f-
7.
8.
Consideration of appointing Parks Commission member to community center
task force. - Jeff
Discussion on Pathway Sites for Walk and Roll- Wanda fYlll
a. Pinewood - Inline skating company/Team Ramp - Robbie Smith
- b. Prairie Restoration Area - North American Prairies - Earl Smith ~. IS v ..)
c. Name that park
9.
~
10. Updates
A. Youth Community Enhancement Project - letter enclosed
B. -Signs in the Parks -
11. Adjoum.
I'" ~ ~,
..."~d':"i~.'-".'
.
. 4.
.
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING. PARKS COMMISSION
Thursday, May 15, 1997 . 4:30 p.m.
Members Present:
Larry Nolan, Earl Smith, Fran Fair, Robbie Smith,
Rick Traver
Jeff O'Neill, Roger Mack, Fred Patch, Steve Grittman, Wanda
Kraemer
Staff Present:
1. Call meetin~ to order.
The meeting was called to order by Acting Chairman Earl Smith.
2. Consideration of approvin~ the minutes for the re~lar meetin~ April 18. 1997.
ROBBIE SMITH MADE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE MINUTES AS
CORRECTED, SECONDED BY FRAN FAIR, OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF
APRIL 18, 1997
3. Add items to a~enda.
Discussion on the Klein Farm Park was added under item 11.
Cardinal Hills 6th Addition Pilot Project/Tony Rieger-Borer.
Tony Rieger-Borer was not able to attend so this item was not discussed.
5. Review concepts for developing Tree Preservation and Plantin~ Ordinance.
Steve Grittman, City Planner, presented a draft of a tree preservation ordinance
using the intent and objectives of the Parks Commission's ordinance.
Fred Patch, Chief Building Official, explained how the tree ordinance would work
with new subdivisions.
The Commissioners discussed the ordinance with Grittman and Patch then made
suggestions. Grittman would review the ordinance and bring back the revised copy
to the next Park's Commission meeting.
Page 1
. 6.
.
.
Park Commission Minutes - 5/15/97
Review Prairie Park Progress
The management plan for the prairie restoration was reviewed and the next step in
the management plan would be to cut the new growth on the sumac plants the end
of June or first part of July and again in August.
7. Freewa.y Park Buildin~
There was nothing to add at this time.
8. Consideration of a.ppointin~ Parks Commission member to community center task
~.
Jeff O'Neill, Assistant Administrator, reported there will be a twelve person task
force to research the possibility of a community center and the Parks Commission
has been asked to appoint a member. Robbie Smith volunteered to represent the
Parks Commission on the task force. Wanda Kraemer would update Larry Nolan on
this item.
9.
Discussion on Pathway Sites for Walk and Roll
Wanda Kraemer, Development Services Technician, explained the events the Parks
Commission would be involved in for "Walk and Roll" would include:
A. Co-sponsoring with Monticello Community Partners the inline skating
safety instructions and demonstrations at Pinewood Elementary
School
B. Taking entries for the "Name That Park Contest",
C. Assisting Tony Rieger-Borer, North American Prairies, in explaining
the prairie grass management plan by the future Prairie Acres Park
and along the city pathway system in that area.
10. Updates
A.
Youth Community Enhancement Project - YCEP
Wanda Kraemer, Development Services Technician, reported a letter was
given to elementary students, from YCEP, explaining a new project to adopt-
a-block or adopt-a-park in Monticello. Groups of students will design
plantings and participate in park clean-up. The committee will be working
towards developing a budget and work plan with the parks department for
1998.
Page 2
.
.
.
Park Commission Minutes - 5/15/97
B. Signs in the Parks
The Commission briefly discussed signs in the parks that would state the
name of the park and a way to identify the group that had adopted the park.
11. Added items.
Klein Farms park area.
Fred Patch reported there is not an agreement in place for the removal of the
buildings on the farm site which are in the future park area. Patch had talked to
the developer, Dave Klein, who was interested in leasing the pole building until the
fall of 1998. There would not be a fee for leasing the building however the trade-off
would be the City would acquire the building for storage use at the end of the lease
agreement. Patch explained because there is not an agreement Klein could sell the
pole building and have it moved off the site this way the building will remain for
parks use.
Roger Mack, Park and Street Superintendent, stated the developer should be
required to remove all of the buildings before the City takes possession.
Jeff O'Neill, Assistant Administrator, added the City was very fortunate to acquire
this parcel of land for park area and that is the reason the developer was not
requested to remove all of the old farm site buildings.
FRAN FAIR MADE A MOTION TO HONOR THE CITY'S AGREEMENT TO
CLEAR THE LAND AND LEASE THE SHED (FOR TWO YEARS) UNTIL
NOVEMBER 1998 AT WHICH TIME IT BECOMES PROPERTY OF THE CITY.
MOTION SECONDED BY RICK TRAVER. Motion passed unanimously.
12. Adjourn.
ROBBIE SMITH MADE A MOTION TO ADJOURN THE MAY 15, 1997
MEETING, SECONDED BY RICK TRAVER. Motion passed unanimously.
Wanda Kraemer
Development Services Technician
Page 3
.~
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING . PARKS COMMISSION
Thursday, April 17, 1997 - 4:30 p.m.
.
Members Present:
Members Absent:
Council Liaison:
Staff Present:
Fran Fair, Earl Smith, Robbie Smith, Rick Traver
Larry Nolan
Bruce Thielen - absent
Jeff O'Neill, Roger Mack, Wanda Kraemer
1. Call meeting to order.
The meeting was called to order by
2. Consideration of approving the minutes for the regular meeting
March 20, 1997.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY ROBBIE SMITH TO APPROVE, SECONDED BY
FRAN FAIR, THE MARCH 20, 1997 MEETING MINUTES.
3. Add items to a{;fenda.
A.
Discussion on moving the location of the parks commission meetings to the
public works building.
.
The Commission requested the meetings be moved to the Public Works
Building's new meeting room.
B.
Discussion on having a tour of the park areas.
The Commissioners discussed touring the parks in the near future. One of
the suggestions was to tour all of the new park areas.
4. Discussion on Tree Ordinance/Tree Preservation - Fred Patch
Fred Patch, Chief Building Official, suggested the discussion on the tree ordinance
be tabled until next months meeting. This will allow staff time to throughly review
the ordinance and research other areas (example subdivision design standards) that
will need to be consistent with adopting a tree ordinance/tree preservation
requirement.
The Commissioners expressed concern over the time it was taking staff to review the
ordinance drafted by the subcommittee. This item had been discussed numerous
times and with new subdivisions being applied for it was time for this to be brought
to council.
.
Page 1
.
.
Park Commission Minutes - 4/17/97
Jeff O'Neill, Assistant Administrator, explained there really has been progress
made. Recently the City Council approved planting of trees in the boulevards which
will allow for the canopy effect the Commission had visioned. There has also been
progress in requiring developers to bond for trees at the beginning of the project. He
encouraged the Commission not to be discourage and was hoping for results in the
near future.
A special meeting was scheduled for May 1, 1997 at the public works building to
discuss tree preservation.
5. Discussion on Shermer/Meadow Oaks PathwayIPark inte{;fration - Jeff O'Neill
This item was not discussed it will be on the next agenda.
6.
Update on the Cardinal Hills IV Test" Pilot Project". 4.t/{
The Commission discussed what the next step should be for the pilotJbroject. Fran
Fair and Rick Traver would contact Grove Nursery for prices on dr;A"'honeysuckle.
Prairie Grass could possible be used on the steep slope areas but the Commission
was concerned that it would have too wild of appearance for this site.
Due to another meeting that had been scheduled Jeff O'Neill and Robbie Smith had
to leave the meeting.
7.
Discussion on plans for the Outlot A buildin{;f - RO{;fer Mack.
Roger Mack presented building plan ideas for the storage/concession building
located in Outlot A park. The Commissioners had required the building to have a
storage area and large overhang for weather protection and shade for picnics. The
building met all the requirements requested.
FRAN FAIR MADE A MOTION TO APPROVE, SECONDED BY RICK TRAVER,
THE DESIGN OF THE STORAGE/CONCESSION BUILDING FOR OUTLOT A
PARK. Motion passed unanimously (Larry Nolan and Robbie Smith absent)
8. Discussion on prairie grass restoration/management plan.
This item was not discussed it will be on the next agenda.
9. Discussion on plantin{;f a tree in the city park as a memorial.
The Commissioners discussed the planting of a tree in memory of the Pinewood
.
Page 2
..
Park Commission Minutes - 4/17/97
Elementary students that died in the school bus accident. It was agreed this would
. be an appropriate memorial from the City.
10. Updates:
A. Pathway site ideas - Wanda Kraemer
B. Result of ISTEA grant (pedestrian bridge over freeway) - Jeff
C. 4th Street Park - hard surfacing - Roger
D. Lighting under bridge - John
E. 1997 budget items
The updates were not discussed.
11. Added items.
There were no other added items.
12. Adjourn.
FRAN FAIR MADE AMOTION, SECONDED BY RICK TRAVER, TO ADJOURN
THE MEETING.
.
Wanda Kraemer
Development Services Technician
.
Page 3
.
MEMORANDUM
To:
Parks Commission
From:
City Staff
Subject:
Tree & Landscape Ordinance Development -- Progress & Status
In order to accelerate the pace of ordinance development related to trees and landscaping, staff
has employed the services of Steven Grittman from Northwest Associated Consultants. Steve has
a strong background in planning and landscape architecture. Steve has reviewed the ordinance
draft developed by the Commission. The attached memorandum addresses Steve's review of the
proposed ordinance. Steve has incorporated much of the Commissions work into a first draft of a
tree preservation and replacement ordinance.
Fred Patch has reviewed the ordinance draft prepared by Steve and made comment back to Steve.
It has been determined that all ordinances related to landscaping and trees associated with
. development must be comprehensively revised and coordinated.
The meeting on Thursday will take the form of a workshop where Steve can obtain and share
additional information in preparation for work on the other ordinance components.
Copies of the sections of the various City ordinances to be modified and coordinated are attached.
.
f'1HY-l.~-l':;j'::f( l::>;::>b
I'IH'-
N
NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS
COMMUNITY PLANNING - CESIGN - MARKET RESEA~CI-l
.
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Monticello Parks Commission
Fred Patch, Building Official
FROM:
Stephen Grittman
DATE:
May 9. 1997
RE:
Monticello - Tree Preservation Ordinance - Draft & Comments
FILE NO:
191.06 - 97.08
.
Enclosed is a draft of a tree preservation ordinance which the City may wish to consider
as an alternative to the draft developed by the Parks Commission. This option has been
put together in an effort to preserve the intent and objectives of the Parks Commission's
draft, but with a few other ideas to hopefully strengthen the ordinance.
As an initial consideration, we have attempted to infuse the ordinance with developer
responsibility for preservation and replacement efforts. Requiring the use of professional
foresters or landscape architects by developers can improve the project, while freeing City
staff to monitor administratively, rather than actively inwlve itself in the program. Second,
the security provisions have been reworked a little to give the City stronger enforcement,
and give the developer an incentive to comply with the program.
While the draft proposed by the Parks Commission includes language relating to mining
and land alteration activities, we would suggest making tree preservation and replacement
a freestanding part of the general ordinance so it clearly applies to all development, not
just land alteration applicants. Certainly, most developers do some significant grading, but
a clause in the mining and land alteration ordinances that the developer must comply with
tree preservation regulations would suffice.
With regard to replacement tree size, the proposed sizes by the Parks Commission raise
a couple of possible concerns. First, larger stock has a higher mortality than smaller stock.
Although we would require replacement of material which does not survive. it becomes an
. 5775 WAYZATA SOULEVARD, SUITE 555 ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA 55416
PHONE 612-595-9636 FAX 612-595-9837 E-MAIL NAC@WINTERNET.COM
.
.
.
1'IHT-.I.'::-.I."=,"=, ( .1.;;1''::>0
,....,..,'-'
enforcement concern, of which concerns the City already has a full plate. Second, larger
stock is often not commercially available. thus delaying compliance, or resulting in requests
for occupancy prior to completion. Solid security can help with this, but typically you would
want an ordinance which does not tend to require reliance on the security. Once again,
administrative oversight and enforcement takes undue staff time.
We have left the formula as the Parks Commission proposed it Although it is somewhat
complex, it seems to increase percentage replacement requirements as more trees are
removed. This should encourage preservation. However, the use of a professional
forester or landscaped architect would remove the burden on compliance from City staff.
Finally, I have removed the list of acceptable trees. leaving the certified nursery stock
requirem ent and prohibited trees, and added a requirement of northern grown,
commercially available stock of a species and selection as approved by City staff. The list
of acceptable species Changes year to year, and an ordinance-based list usually ends up
getting ignored. As long as the prohibited tree list is provided, you should get a reasonable
seledion of trees.
.
.
.
l'II"'1I-.L~-.L":;J~r ..L"'}.-i'O .u,"""
Ordinance No.
City of Monticello
Wright County, Minnesota
AN ORDINANCe AMENDING TITLE 10, CHAPTER 3, SECTION 2 [G], OF THE
MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE RELATING TO REQUIRED FENCING,
SCREENING, AND LANDSCAPING BY ADDING TREE PRESERVATION AND
REPLACEMENT REGULA nONS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CllY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA HEREBY ORDAINS
AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1.
{G.1] TREE PRESERVATION AND REPLACEMENT: AU areas for which building
or zoning permits are requested shall be subject to the following regulations
with regard to the preservation of existing trees, and the replacement of
trees lost to such development.
1.
PURPOSE: It is the intent of the City of Monticello to protect,
preserve, and enhance the natural environment of the City and to
encourage a resourceful and prudent approach to the development
of wooded areas. It is found that trees enhance the value of the City's
neighborhoods, and help to reduce wind, pollution, and energy
consumption. Therefore, the City of Monticello has found It necessary
and desirable to establish requirements and direction as to the
preservation of existing trees on development sites. The following
process is designed to 8ncourage all developers, land owners, and
builders to save all healthy trees of any siZe.
2. DEFINITIONS: [keep the proposed Parks Commission language as
drafted, except for Land Alteration and Mining Operations.
3. PLAN REQUIRED: All developers and builders, prior to alteration of
any land, shall be required to do the following:
a.
Prepare a tree preservation plan which shall be incorporated
into the application for a conditional use permit, preliminary
plat, building permit, or other zoning or building permit. if a
tree preservation plan has previously been prepared and
approved for a parcel, an applicant may rely on the previous
plan, certifying compliance with said previous plan.
.
.
.
MRY-1;d-1':;l'::fr l::>:::>b
NHL.
U.lr.... "'-'-'-" ..,......." I. ............ .....,
b.
Ensure that the tree preservation plan is adhered to during the
development and building process.
c. Submit a security, either through cash escrow or irrevocable
letter of aedit in a form acceptable to the City Zoning
Administrator, for each lot to be developed. Said security shall
be held for twelve (12) months after the planting of any
replacement trees as a surety for compliance with the Plan,
and for survival and replanting of any replacement trees which
fail to survive as required by Paragraph 8 of this Sedion. Said
security shall be in an amount as follows:
I. Applicants for development on 1-3 lots: $1,000 per lot,
plus one hundred fifty percent (150%) Of the cost to
furnish and plant the replacement trees, as estimated
by a qualified landscape contractor.
ii. Applicants for development on 4 or more lots: $500 per
lot, plus one hundred fIfty percent (150%) of the cost to
furnish and plant the replacement trees, as estimated
by a qualified landscape contractor.
4.
PLAN PREPARATION AND CONTENTS: The Tree Preservation
Plan shall be certified by a professional forester or landscape
architect. The forester or landscape architect shall indicate on the
plan the following items:
a. Size, species, and location of all significant trees.
b. Identification of all significant trees to be saved, and proposed
to be removed.
c. Measures proposed to proted significant trees, including but
not limited to the following:
i. Installation of snow fencing or polyethylene laminar
safety netting placed at the drip line.
it Prohibition of placing fill within the drip line.
iii. Installation of erosion control measures.
iv. Prevention of change in soil chemistry due to concrete
washout and leakage or spillage of toxic materials.
v. Prevention of pruning from April 15 to August 15.
d.
Tree Replacement A developer or builder shall replace
significant live trees lost or reasonably anticipated to be lost as
a result of grading, building upon, or any other alteration of the
.
.
.
I'lH,-l"::-l';l':f( 1;:)';:) (
, ,:(
", I) ,t\U
0"") t.
,0 ,f\ LJv
\... vS', 1/
\\~r
I\J "(,I)'
, \ \~'
I'IH.....
land subject to a building or zoning permit. The trees required
to be replaced pursuant to this Section shall be in addition to
any other trees required to be planted pursuant to any other
section of this code. The quantity of such replacement shall
be determined in accordance with the following formula:
A- Total Caliper Inches of Significant Trees Lost as a
Result of the Land Alteration.
S= Total Caliper Inches of Significant Trees Situated on the
Land Subject to the Building or Zoning Penn it.
C= Tree Replacement Constant (1.33).
D= Replacement Trees (Number of Caliper Inches)
Formula: (( AJB )x C) x A = D
5. SIZES OF REPLACEMENT TREES: Replacement trees shall be no
less than the following sizes:
SPECIES OF REPLACEMENT TREES: Replacement trees shall be
of species which are similar to those trees which are lost or removed,
to the extent possible. Replacement trees must be "certified nursery
~, stock", commercially available for planting in the Monticello area. and
1) consist of northem grown material. The City Zoning Administrator
lllQ' maintains a list of acceptable species, but in no case shall
U replacement trees consist of the following:
{\,;'J'", /
G~f)
6.
a. Deciduous Trees: 2 caliper inches.
b. Coniferous Trees: 6 feet in height.
a.
b.
Box Elder.
Silver Maple varieties.
Catalpa varieties.
Russian Olive.
Gingko, female sp.
Mulberry.
Cottonwood or Poplar varieties.
Willow varieties.
Elm varieties.
c.
d.
e.
f.
g.
h.
i.
7. TIME TO PERFORM: Replacement trees shall be planted as soon
as time and the growing season permits following the alteration of the
land, but in no case, shall replacement tree planting occur later than
eighteen (18) months from the date Of issuance of the zoning or
building permit.
.
.
.
1"lr"Il - .Lc.. .L.J.J I ...,.,......" I
8.
REPLANTING: Any replacement, tree which is not alive or healthy
one (1) year after the date that the last replacement tree has been
planted shall be removed and a new healthy tree of the same size
shall immediately be planted in place of the removed tree.
9. COMPLETION: Following the completing of grading and
construction, the professional forester or landscape architect shall
provide a written certification to the City verifying compliance with the
tree preservation measures. In addition, said certification shall
Identify all trees lost to .development, including those which had been
originally proposed to be saved. The Tree Replacement Plan shall be
modified to require replacement of any sud'\ trees at a 1: 1 caliper inch
ratio.
This ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication.
/lslI
TOTAL P.12I7
.
.
.
11~7~2:
11~7~3:
establishing a fee, charge, or assessment against the subsequent
subdivider/developers which benefit from said prior improvements for
the purpose of maintaining or upgrading the public improvements.
(9/9/85, #149)
STREET IMPROVEMENTS:
(A) The full width of the right-of-way shall be graded, including the
subgrade of the areas to be paved, in accordance with standards and
specifications for street construction as required by the City Council.
(B) All streets shall be improved with pavement in accordance with the
standards and specifications for street construction as required by the
City Council.
(C) All streets to be paved shall be of an overall width in accordance with
the standards and specifications for street construction as required by
the City Council.
(D) Curb and gutter will be constructed as required by the standards and
specifications for street construction as required by the City Council.
(E) Storm sewers, culverts, storm water inlets, and other drainage
facilities will be required where they are necessary to insure adequate
storm water drainage for the subdivision. Where required, such
drainage facilities shall be constructed in accordance with the
standards and specifications for street construction as required by the
City Council.
(F) Street trees and boulevard sodding shall be planted in conformance
with the standards and specifications as required by the City Council.
(G) Street signs of the standard design as may be required by the City
Council shall be installed at each street intersection.
(H) Sidewalks of standard design as may be required by the City Council.
SANITARY SEWER AND WATER DISTRIBUTION IMPROVEMENTS:
(A) Sanitary sewers shall be installed as may be required by standards
and specifications approved by the City Council.
(B) City water facilities, including pipe fittings, hydrants, etc., shall be
installed as may be required by standards and specifications approved
by the City Council. Where City water facilities are not available for
extension into the proposed subdivision, the City Council may by
ordinance grant a franchise for such water facilities to serve all
properties within a subdivision where a complete and adequate
TITLE XI/Chpt 7/Page 4
MONTICELLO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE
[E]
.
.
[F]
.
DRAINAGE PLANS: In the case of all apartment, business, and
industrial developments, a minimum of 3 sets of drainage plans shall
be submitted to the City Engineer for review, and the final drainage
plans shall be subject to written approval.
Except as otherwise approved by the City Engineer and/or Building
Official and upon demonstration of positive drainage, all dwellings
and commercial and industrial buildings shall be constructed such
that the ground elevation at the building site will be a minimum of
twelve (12) inches above finished street elevation at the building
access point. The exact elevation will be determined by the Building
Official.
All garages and parking facilities shall be situated such that there
will be direct and positive drainage to the street access at finished
grade elevation. All elevations shall be established prior to issuance
of a building permit.
Occupancy shall not be granted until the builder certifies
conformance with the grading plan for the lot.
The developer shall have a registered land surveyor or engineer
certify that the development has been rough graded to within
tolerance limits according to the grading plan.
(#279, 6/10/96)
GENERAL FENCING, SCREENING, AND LANDSCAPING:
1. No fence shall exceed six (6) feet in height within a required
yard; and in the case of grade separation such as the division of
properties by a retaining wall, the height shall be determined on
the basis of measurement from the average point between the
highest and lowest grade.
2. No fence, structure, planting, trees, or shrubs shall be permitted
within the visibility area of any comer formed by property lines
intersecting with a railway right-of-way. (The visibility area
referred to above shall be in the form of a triangle with two
sides formed by the property lines mentioned and the third side
formed by a straight line connecting the two (2) twenty-five (25)
foot points on both sides of the comer.)
EXCEPTIONS:
(a) Chain link fences with openings of one and five-eights (1-
5/8) inches to two (2) inches and not exceeding a
maximum of forty-eight (48) inches in height may be
allowed anywhere within the visibility area.
MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE
3/6
(b)
.
(c)
(d)
(e)
.
Except as provided in Chapter 3, Section 2, [F] 2, fences,
plantings, trees, or shrubs not over three feet in height
may be permitted if not prohibited by other areas of the
ordinances.
Except as provided in Chapter 3, Section 2, [F] 2, fences
may be erected on any part of a lot when they are to be
located behind the front line of the principal building on
that lot.
Fences over 6 feet in height shall be treated as structures
and will require appropriate permits as required.
Except as provided in Chapter 3, Section 2 [F] 2, fences
may be erected on the side of rear lot lines of a property
subject to a recordable agreement between adjacent
property owners. Said agreement shall assign
maintenance and cost responsibilities between the
adjoining properties, shall become null and void upon
removal of the fence, and shall be recorded against the
titles of each property. Where no agreement is reached,
fences shall be set back a minimum of two (2) feet from
any lot line.
At the discretion of the Building Official, a boundary
survey may be required to ascertain the exact location of
the boundary line.
(#248, 3/14/94)
3. In all zoning districts, the lot area remaining after providing for
off-street parking, off-street loading, sidewalks, driveways,
building site, and/or other requirements shall be planted and
maintained in grass sodding, shrubs, or other acceptable
vegetation or treatment generally used in landscaping'. Fences
or trees placed upon utility easements are subject to removal if
required for the maintenance or improvement of the utility.
Trees on utility easements containing overhead wires shall not
exceed ten (10) feet in height.
[G] REQUIRED FENCING, SCREENING, AND LANDSCAPING: The
fencing and screening required by this subsection shall be subject to
Subsection [F] above and shall consist of either a fence or a
landscaped planting plan.
1.
.
PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVE: The purpose of th\sPDlicJ)s to
establish minimum requirements and standards retati'Ve to
landscaping, buffering, and screening to be implemented
concurrently with site plans approved by the City; the standards
MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE
3/7
and criteria shall be used by City staff, Planning Commission,
and City Council in the review and evaluation of such plans and
development proposals.
.
The objectives of these requirements are to establish and
maintain forestation of the city; to provide appropriate ground
cover vegetation for controlled soil erosion; to enhance when
necessary the natural environment particularly in instances
where the natural environment is disturbed during the course of
development; and to establish standards for utilization of
natural materials to achieve desired screening and buffering.
This policy sets forth minimum requirements oflandscaping,
reforestation, and technica1limitations to assure that the result
is consistent with reasonable maintenance require~ents on a
long-term basis and to assure that the results provide an
aesthetic urban environment.
.
2. DETAILED LANDSCAPE PLANS: Detailed landscape plans
shall be required in all cases where site plan approval is
specified by the zoning ordinance and subdivision ordinance.
The landscape plan should be based upon the site plan designs
submitted for approval and, to assure clarity, it is required the
plan be produced on a separate sheet from that containing
grading, drainage, and utility plans.
Detailed landscape plans shall include the following
information:
(a) GENERAL:
1. Name and address of developer!
owner.
ii. Name and address of architect/
designer.
111. Date of plan preparation.
IV. Dates and description of all revisions.
v. Name of project or development.
VI. Scale of plan (engineering scale only, at 1 inch
equals 50 feet or less).
. vii. North point indication.
MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE 3/8
(b) THE SITE ANALYSIS:
I. Boundary lines of property with dimensions based
. upon certified survey.
11. Name and alignment of proposed and existing
adjacent on-site streets.
HI. Location of existing and proposed utility rights-of-
way, easements, and lines (water, gas, electric).
IV. Location of existing and proposed building.
v. Topographic contours of the minimum interval of
2 feet, extending at least 100 feet beyond the site
boundaries.
VI. Location of existing and proposed parking
facilities, including curbing detail and traffic
island delineators.
VII. Location of existing and proposed water bodies.
viii. Location of existing and proposed sidewalks, trail
. corridors, and fire lanes.
IX. Other existing or proposed conditions which
would be expected to affect landscaping.
x. Percentage of gross site area not covered by
structures and pavement.
(c) LANDSCAPE DATA:
I. Planting schedule (table) containing symbols,
quantities, common names, botanical names, sizes
of plant material, root specification (b.r., B & B,
potted, etc.) and special planting instructions.
11. Existing trees and shrubbery, locations, common
names, and appproximate size.
iii. Planting detail (show all species to scale at
normal mature crown diameter or spread for local
hardiness zone).
. IV. Typical sections in details of fences, tie walls,
planter boxes, totlots, picnic areas, berms, and the
like.
MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE 3/9
.
.
.
v. Typical sections of landscape islands and planter
beds with identification of materials used.
VI.
Details of planting beds and foundation plantings.
V11. N ate indicating how disturbed soil areas will be
restored through the use of sodding, seeding, or
other techniques.
VI11. Delineation of both sodded and seeded areas with
respective areas in square feet.
IX. Coverage plan for underground irrigation system,
if any.
x. Exterior lighting plan.
(d) SPECIAL CONDITIONS: Where landscape or man-made
materials are used to provide ordinance or policy-required
screening from adjacent and neighboring properties, a
cross-through section shall be provided showing the
perspective of the site from the neighboring property at
the property line elevation.
(e)
COPIES: The following copies shall be provided in the
following format:
1. Blue prints at full scale and size as the site plan.
11. One 8-1/2" by 11" photopositive reduction or one
8-1/2" x 11" reproducible drawing which will
provide legible copies clearly representing all
details and design on the plan. Otherwise, to
assure legibility, 30 copies of the proposed
landscape plan, folded to approximately 9" x 12",
shall be submitted; petitioners may submit both
reduced and larger size legible copies to assure
such plans are available to Planning
Commissioners and Council members.
3. ELEMENTS OF LANDSCAPE DESIGN AND MINIMUM
NUMBER OF TREES:
(a) Elements oflandscape design may include:
1.
Existing topographical and vegetative features;
11.
Benning;
MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE
3/10
111. Planting, including the required minimum
number of overstory trees, understory trees,
shrubs, flowers, and ground cover materials.
.
(b) The minimum number of major or overstory trees on any
given site shall be as indicated below. These are the
minimum substantial planting, in addition to other
understory trees, shrubs, flowers, and ground cover
deemed appropriate for a complete quality landscape
treatment of the site.
1.
<I-11~;'
<' /
, ~"'- 04-> ~""
/ \. ..~\
<:-, c>. V"'
.~ .~
/u~ \.
/ .
.
.~,----..'---------------~
Commercial, industrial, institutional sites",shall
contain at a rmmmum e grea er of one (1) tree
per 1,000 square feet of gross building floor area,
or one (1) tree per 50 lineal feet of site perimeter.
When total property area far exceeds building or
developed area, and when excess property area is
intended for use in conjunction with future
expansion of the development area, site perimeter
shall be defined as that area which extends 30
feet beyond side and rear yard setback of parking
areas and/or 30 feet beyond side and rear yard
setback of primary or accessory structure.
11.
-.-/.--.~--",,---..
Multi-residential\ites shall contain at a
minimum one tree per dwelling unit.
(#174,4/10/89)
(c) An equivalent of up to fifty percent (50%) of the required
number of overs tory trees may be created through the use
of overstory trees in combination with other landscape
design elements as listed in 3 (a) above. .
In no case shall the number of overs tory trees be less than
fifty percent (50%) of the appropriate formula. The
burden shall be upon the developer to demonstrate by
narrative and by graphics how the equivalent effect is
provided. The equivalent effect shall be subject to
approval by the City Council.
4. MINIMUM SIZE OF PLANTINGS:
(a) Required trees shall be of the following minimum
planting size:
.
i.
Deciduous trees--2.5 inches diameter as measured
six inches above the ground.
11.
Coniferous trees--6 feet in height.
MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE
3/11
(b)
A minimum of fifteen percent (15%) of the required
minimum number of trees for multi-residential
developments shall be long-lived hardwood deciduous
trees, 3.5 inches in diameter as measured six inches off
the ground.
'.
(c) Evergreen shrubs used for screening purposes, including
those used in conjunction with benning, shall be a
minimum of 24 inches in height.
5. SPECIES:
(a) All trees used in site developments shall be indigenous to
the appropriate hardiness zone and physical
characteristics of the site.
(b) All deciduous trees proposed to satisfy the minimum
requirements of this policy shall be long-lived hardw~~~.
species.
.
(c) The complement of trees fulfilling t4"~"Iequirements of
~ .' . .----.:J
this policy shall be not less t:han"25"peI:cent (25%)
deciduous and not less thaii- 2~i_percent (25%) coniferous.
L---~-~
6. SODDING AND GROUND COVER: All areas not otherwise
improved in accordance with approved site plans shall be
sodded. Exceptions to this criterion may be recommended by
the Planning Commission and approved by the City Council as
follows:
(a) Seeding of future expansion areas as shown on approved
plans.
(b) Undisturbed areas containing existing viable natural
vegetation which can be maintained free of foreign and
noxious plant materials.
(c) Areas designated as open space or future expansion areas
properly planted and maintained with prairie grass.
(d) Use of mulch materials such as bark, rock mulch over 4
mil poly, and wood chips in support of shrubs and
foundation plantings.
7. SLOPES AND BERM:
.
(a)
Final slope grades steeper than the ratio of 3.5:1 will not
be permitted without special approval treatment such as
terracing or retaining walls.
MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE
3/12
(b) Berming used to provide required effective screening of
parking lots and other open areas shall have a slope ratio
of 3: 1.
.
8. WOODLAND AND PRESERVATION POLICY AND CREDIT:
(a) It is thec€?li~ of the City of Monticello to preserve the
natural forest and woodland areas throughout the city;
and with respect to specific site development, to retain, as
far as practicable, substantial tree stands which should
be incorporated into the site.
(b)
Credit for the retention of existing trees which are of
acceptable species, size, and location may be given to
satisfy..--tQe minimum number requirements set forth in
this eY and in the City ordinances.
(c) Where conventional multi-residential projects clearly
demonstrate affirmative design efforts toward the
preservation and enhancement of desirable natural site
characteristics, up to 500 square feet per 9-welli!!K.@i:t
may be subkJ!~teclfFo~ t!t:~~nim~ ?Iea__~~9..~i,:r~.:m~!lts_
so as to allow up to not more than one dwelling unit per
acre.
\'.\
.
(d) Where commercial, industrial, and institutional uses
clearly demonstrate affirmative design efforts toward the
preservation and enhancement of desirable natural site
characteristics, ordinance- required paved parking spaces
may be reduced and installation deferred uiitifsuchtlme-
as the need-fur"""tnefull cot.J1plementOr2.ar~..K:. The Ii.'eecf
shall be determined in conformance with the "proof of
parking" plan so approved by the City. ------
~
9. USE OF LANDSCAPING FOR SCREENING: Where natural
materials such as trees or hedges are approved in lieu of
required screening by means of wall or fences, the density and
species of such plantings shall be such to achieve 90 percent
opacity year.ronnd.
10. USE OF LANDSCAPING FOR SCREENING--INTERSTATE
HIGHWAY EXPOSURE:
.
(a) The City of Monticello recognizes the value of interstate
highway exposure to commercial and industrial
developers. The City also wishes to avoid the undesirable
monotony of fully exposed building sides and rears and
wishes to provide natural visual variety to the travelers
on the interstate. Natural visual variety will alleviate the
MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE
3/13
.
boredom for travelers and ~rill project a clean and
pleasant image of the city of Monticello. Commercial and
industrial developers oflots!parcels having substantial
exposure to the interstate shall be required to landscape!
screen to provide 60% opacity year-round, at least 80% of
such screening to be of natural materials.
(b)
Residential development on lots/parcels having
substantial exposure to the interstate shall be required to
landscape/screen to provide 90% opacity year-round, at
least 75% of said screening to be of natural materials.
(c)
All landscape/screening plans for lots and parcels having
substantial exposure to the interstate highway must give
design consideration to the differences in elevation
between the interstate and the parcel subject to
development, understanding that parcels lower than the
interstate necessarily require taller screening to be
effective in providing visual variety and the required
percentage of opacity.
.
11. PARKING LOT LANDSCAPING: To avoid the undesirable
monotony, heat, and wind associated with large parking lots,
such lots shall have a minimum of one internal landscaped
area/island delineator in addition to any required traffic safety
island for each additional 5,000 square feet of off-street parking
space after the first 5,000 square feet; such island shall be equal
in size to a single parking space and shall be bounded by
concrete curbing. Trees may be installed in approved traffic
safety islands used to delineate parking spaces from driving
aisles and in other areas. The internal landscaped island(s)
required above may be deleted if the aggregate area and trees of
individual traffic islands meets or exceeds the above
requirements.
12. AGREEMENT AND BOND:
.
(a) An agreement will be signed between the City and the
owner which states that in exchange for issuance of a
building permit, the owner will construct, install, and
maintain all items shown on the approved plan and that
he will replace and/or correct any deficiencies or defaults
that occur in the plan for a period of one complete year or
two complete growing seasons subsequent to the
installation of the landscaping plan. A landscaping
performance bond will be submitted along vvith the
agreement at this time. For developments in I-1 and I-2
zones, upon petition by developer, the City Council may
allow phasing-in of installation of required landscaping
MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE
3/14
.
.
[H]
over a period of three years in order to reduce initial
development costs. Terms of the phased installation of
landscaping to be incorporated into the agreement.
(#174,4110/89)
(b)
If after one complete year or two growing seasons all the
commitments are met, then steps may be taken to release
both the bond and contract agreement.
According to ordinance, the developer/owner is
responsible for maintaining the landscaping in a neat and
proper fashion.
Further, the screening is expected to remain effective
continually, so any plant material which dies or ceases to
function as a screen shall be replaced or reinforced
immediately to conform to City ordinance.
13. A required screening fence shall be constructed of masonry,
brick, wood, or steel. Such fence shall provide a solid screening
effect and not exceed eight (8) feet in height or be less than six
(6) feet in height. The design and materials used in
constructing a required screening fence shall be subject to the
approval of the Planning Commission based upon a
recommendation by the City Engineer and Building Inspector.
GLARE: Any lighting used to illuminate off-street parking area,
sign, or other structure, shall be arranged as to deflect light away
from any adjoining residential zone or from the public streets. Direct
or sky-reflected glare, where from floodlights or from high
temperature processes such as combustion or welding, shall not be
directed into any adjoining property. The source of lights shall be
hooded or controlled in some manner so as not to cast light on
adjacent property. Bare incandescent light bulbs shall not be
permitted in view of adjacent property or public right-of-way. Any
light or combination oflights which cast light on a public street shall
not exceed one (1) foot candle (meter reading) as measured from the
center line of said street. Any light or combination of lights which
cast light on residential property shall not exceed 0.4 foot candles
(meter reading) as measured from said property.
[I] SMOKE: The emission of smoke by any use shall be in compliance
with and regulated by the State of Minnesota Pollution Control
Standards, Minnesota Regulation
APe 1-15.
.
3/15
MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE
, .
\ '
. .
. SECTION:
.
.
8-3-1:
8-3-2:
8-3-3:
8-3-4:
8~3-5:
8-3~6:
8-3-7:
8-3-1:
8-3-2:
8.3~3:
8-3-4:
CHAPTER 3
TREES AND SHRUBS
Purpose
Prohibited Trees
Order to Treat or Remove
Regulations for Planting in Public Places
Requirements Applicable to Trees in New Subdivisions
Dutch Elm Disease
Abuse or Mutilation
PURPOSE: It is the purpose of this chapter to protect and promote the
public health, safety, and general welfare of the people of the city by
regulating the planting and maintenance of trees in order to protect trees
and to prevent and abate hazardous and nuisance conditions 'Within the city.
PROHIBITED TREES: It is unlawful to plant any species of elm trees within
the city.
(5/9/77, #29)
ORDER TO TREAT OR REMOVE: The City may order the trimming,
treatment, or removal 'of trees or plants upon public or private property when
they shall determine that such action is necessary to the public safety or
necessary to prevent the spread of disease or of insects harmful to trees and
shrubs.
REGULATIONS FOR PLANTING IN PUBLIe PLACES:
(A) No tree shall be planted or placed on public property or right-of-way
without the approval of the City Engineer.
(B) Permits:
1. No person shall plant or remove trees or shrubs in public places
without first filling out an application and obtaining a permit
from the City.
2. The following provisions apply to the issuance of permits where
required for planting in public places.
(a) Application Data: The application required herein shall
state the number of trees or plants to be planted or set
out, the location, and specific name of each tree or plant.
TITLE VIII/Chpt 3/Page 1
MONTICELLO CITY ORDINANCE
(b) Standards for Issuance: A permit shall be issued ifit is
found that the proposed plantings will be in the best
interest of the community.
. 8-3-5: REQUIREMENTS APPLICABLE TO TREES IN NEW SUBDIVISIONS:
~ \ LJJ (A) In new subdivisions, on lots with frontage on a single right-of-way, it is
y ",_', required that two (2) trees be planted per platted lot uno trees are in
v ~ "'- existence. For lots with frontage on more than one right-of-way, it is
0\ / c.o~~~ t-____requiredthfi.!JQ:IE:.(4) trees be planted per platted lot ifno trees are in
( F\ ve"') ,existence. Two (2) trees must be planted in the boulevard adjoining
~/ . ~/ each yard havi6'g street frontage.
>..9'<5) \..),)'A+J-~ . ~ \ ~ ('>QO\\lu';'lV'-- 2, (#287,3/24/97)
,<(j'J. - _J kY AI ~ \,<"L."'~\-~ ,~ (#267 3/27/95)
'<.Y <>? <. ,>r v/ . C:> '
'\ ~v> ti _ _ \,-_~_________
_<:::-G.~. h'F;0 (B) Irrsubdivision plantiri-gs,. not less than two (2) or more than three (3)
~v spede-s-oftre-esshalfbe planted in any block, and neither less than
\l~'" (7
\ ~"7 (, twenty percent (20%) nor more than fifty percent (50%) of the tota1~y;
\)e,~,,~~ -c:J6~' trees planted in__a block may be of the same species. Only trees listed
~~J in Sectiort"S:S-22 Pf this chapter shall be planted.
~ '------C ~\u.:,t-\\t7\ ys..() \\1:.~ Q) t>~ _ ee
(C) Requiredt.trees shall be planted in the boulevard at a location rang;_ng
/// from 4 ft,to 10 ft from the curb. Precise location within this range tc
(be detered by the City. .--:
* .~ .~~p i:;~~: ~;;~~~;
.
(D )'~Required subdivision trees must have a trunk diameter of at least two \
inches (2") at one foot (I') above the ground. (~\~'-o> O\~\'"-..J~J..l..~Jt~~)
(""-'-,
(E) R~guit'ed--~ubdivision trees must be protected and supported ~.<) C"
~a-ofapproved type.
(F) No required subdivision tree shall be planted in soil too poor to ensure
the growth of such tree unless twenty-seven (27) cubic feet (S'x3'x3') of
soil is removed and replaced with suitable loam. ''2.
8-3-6:
DUTCH ELM DISEASE:
.
(A) Forester: Duties: The powers and duties of the City Forester as set
forth in this code are hereby conferred upon the Park Inspector. It is
the duty of the Forester to coordinate, under the direction and control
of the Council, all activities of the municipality relating to the control
and prevention of Dutch Elm disease. He shall recommend to the
Council the details of a program for the control of Dutch Elm disease
and perform the duties incident to such a program adopted by the
Council.
MONTICELLO CITY ORDINANCE
TITLE VIII/Chpt 3/Page 2
.
.
.
, .
(B) Program: It is the intention of the Council of Monticello to conduct a
program of plant pest control pursuant to the authority granted by
Minnesota Statutes 1961, Section 18.022. This program is directed
specifically at the control and elimination of Dutch Elm disease fungus
and elm bark beetles and is undertaken at the recommendation of the
Commissioner of Agriculture. The City Forester shall act as
coordinator between the Commissioner of Agriculture and the Council
in the conduct of this program.
(C) Nuisances: The following things are public nuisances whenever they
may be found within the city of Monticello.
1. Any living or standing Elm tree or part thereof infected to any
degree with the Dutch Elm disease fungus Ceratocystits ulmi
(Buisman) Moreau or which harbors any of the elm bark beetles
Scolytus Multistriatus (Eichh.) or Hylurgopinus rufipes
(Marsh).
2. Any dead Elm tree or part thereof, including logs, branches,
stumps, firewood, or other Elm material from which the bark
has not been removed and burned or sprayed with an effective
Elm bark beetle insecticide.
It is unlawful for any person to permit any public nuisance as defined
in 1 and 2 to reD;1ain on any premises owned or controlled by him
within the city of Monticello. Such nuisances may be abated in the
manner prescribed by this chapter.
(D)
Inspection and Investigation: The forester shall inspect all premises
and places within the city as often as practicable to determine whether
any condition described in (C) exists thereon. He shall investigate all
reported incidents of infestation of Dutch Elm fungus or elm bark
beetles.
(E)
Entry on Private Premises: The forester or his duly authorized agents
may enter upon private premises at any reasonable time for the
purpose of carrying out any of the duties assigned him under this
chapter.
(F)
Diagnosis: The forester shall, upon finding conditions indicating
Dutch Elm infestation, immediately send appropriate specimens or
samples to the Commissioner of Agriculture for analysis or take such
other steps for diagnosis as may be recommended by the
Commissioner. Except as provided in (H), no action to remove infected
trees or wood shall be taken until positive diagnosis of the disease has
been made.
MONTICELLO CITY ORDINANCE
TITLE VIII/Chpt 3/Page 3
(G) Abatement of Nuisances: In abating the nuisances defined in (C), the
forester shall cause the infected tree or wood to be sprayed, removed,
burned, or otherwise effectively treated so as to destroy and prevent as
fully as possible the spread of Dutch Elm disease fungus and elm bark
beetles. Such abatement procedures shall be carried out in accordance
with current technical and expert opinions and plans as may be
designated by the Commissioner of Agriculture.
.
(H) Procedures for Removal of Infected Trees and Wood:
.
.
1. Whenever the forester finds with reasonable certainty that
infestation defined in (C) exists in any tree or wood in any
public or private place in the city, he shall proceed as follows:
(a) If the forester finds that the danger of infestation of other
elm trees is not imminent because of elm dormancy, he
shall make a written report of his findings to the Conncil
which shall proceed by (1) abating the nuisance as a
public improvement under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter
429, or (2) abating the nuisance as provided in 2 of this
section.
(b) If the forester finds that danger of infestation of other elm
trees is imminent, he shall notify the property owner by
certified mail that the nuisance will be abated within a
specified time, not less than 5 days from the date of
mailing of such notice. The forester shall iIIlI1lediately
report such action to the Council; and after the expiration
of the time limited by the notice, he may abate the
nUlsance.
2.
Upon receipt of the forester's report required by 1, part (a), the
Council shall by resolution order the nuisance abated. Before
action is taken on such resolution, the Council shall publish
notice of its intention to meet to consider taking action to abate
the nuisance. This notice shall be mailed to affected property
owners and published once not less than one week prior to such
meeting. The notice shall state the time and place of the
meeting, the streets affected, action proposed, the estimated cost
of the abatement, and the proposed basis of assessment, if any,
of costs. At such hearing or adjournment thereof, the Council
shall hear property owners with reference to the scope and
desirability of the proposed project. The Council shall thereafter
adopt a resolution confirming the original resolution with such
modifications as it considers desirable and provide for the doing
of the work by day labor or by contract.
MONTICELLO CITY ORDINANCE
TITLE VlIlIChpt 3/Page 4
3.
The forester shall keep a record of the costs of abatements done
under this section and shall report monthly to the City Clerk all
work done for which assessments are to be made stating and
certifying the description of the land, lots, and parcels involved
and the amount chargeable to each.
.
4. On or before September 1 of each year, the Clerk shall list the
total unpaid charges for each abatement against each separate
lot or parcel to which they are attributable under this ordinance.
The Council may then spread the charges or any portion thereof
against the property involved as a special assessment under
Minnesota Statutes, Section 420.101, and other pertinent
statutes for certification to the County Auditor and collection
the following year along with current taxes.
The City Council of Monticello has determined that the health of the
Elm trees within the municipal limits is threatened by a fatal disease
know as Dutch Elm disease. It has further determined that the loss of
Elm trees growing upon public and private property would
substantially depreciate the value of property within the city and
impair the safety, good order, general welfare, and convenience of the
public. It is declared to be the intention of the Council to control and
prevent the spread of this disease, and this ordinance is being enacted
for that purpose.
.
f' .
It is declared to be the intention of the Council to establish a policy for
sharing the cost of abatement of Dutch Elm disease nuisances with the
property owners. The municipal share shall be 50 percent and the
property owner's share shall be 50 percent.
(I)
Spraying Elm Trees: Whenever the forester determines that any Elm
tree or Elm wood within the city is infected with Dutch Elm fungus, he
may spray all nearby high value Elm trees with an effective Elm bark
beetle destroying concentrate. Spraying activities authorized by this
section shall be conducted in accordance with technical and expert
opinions and plans of the Commissioner of Agriculture and under the
supervision of the Commissioner and his agents whenever possible.
(J)
Transporting Elm Wood Prohibited: It is unlawful for any person to
transport within the city any bark-bearing Elm wood without having
obtained a permit from the forester. The forester shall grant permits
only when the purposes of the chapter will be served thereby.
.
(K) Interference Prohibited: No person shall prevent, delay, or interfere
with the forester or his agents while they are engaged in the
performance of duties imposed by this chapter.
MONTICELLO CITY ORDINANCE
TITLE VIII/Chpt 3/Page 5
.
.
.
8-3-7:
ABUSE OR MUTILATION: No person shall (A) damage, cut, carve, kill, or
injure the bark of any tree or plant on any public property; (B) attach any
rope, wire, or other contrivance to any tree or plant on public property; (C)
dig in or otherwise disturb public grass areas, or in any other way injure or
impair the natural beauty or usefulness of any area or public property; (D)
cause or permit any wire charged with electricity or any gaseous, liquid, or
solid substance harmful to trees or plants to come in contact with them.
~. .
MONTICELLO CITY ORDINANCE
TITLE VIII/Chpt 3/Page 6
.
Prairie and oak savanna management guidelines for the Monticello area
.
Prepared by:
Scientific and Nahlral Areas Program,
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources
Spring 1997
.
.
.
.
Table of Contents
Summary
Overview
City of Monticello
I Public Use
II Structures and Facilities
III Management Recommedations
Figure 1 Kiosk Sample Text
Figure 2 Table of Recommendations
Montississippi Park
I Public Use
II Structures and Facilities
III Management Recommedations
Northern States Power Company
I Public Use
II Structures and Facilities
III Management Recommedations
Maps
.
.
.
SUMMARY
SUMMARY OF PURPOSE
The proposed management area consists of three independently managed
properties owned by the City of Monticello, Wright County, and Northern States Power
Company. The sites, between the Mississippi River and the Burlington Northern
Railroad have widely varying charactersitics, ranging from pine plantation to closed-
canopy oak savanna to fragments of dry prarie. As a whole, these three management
areas offer an opportunity to enhance the native communities on a larger spatial scale.
Working to Return the vegetational diversity found in native dry prairies and savannas
found here benefits both the natural and human communities. These native communities
offer education on the history and ecology of the area. Active management of these
communities, the dry prairie and oak savanna is necessary to enhance the native
characteristics of the management areas.
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS
The following is a list of management measures recommended for the three
management areas combined. Recommendations specific to each site are located within
the plan.
Prescribed Burning
Spring burning of the prairie is an effective way of enhancing native prairie
species. Prescribed burns should be conducted at varying frequencies over a three year
cycle to maintain ecological diversity in the native species and reduce new woody
growth.
Seed Collection
V olunteers (schools, citizens,e tc.) could be used to collect seeds, germinate
seedlings to be replanted in the prairie to enhance the recolonization of native prairie
species. Summer and fall immediately following a spring bum is the optimal time to
harvest native plant seed.
Woody Regrowth
During a spring burn, sumac that has been burned, will develop new growth.
Approximately twice during the growing season, new growth should be cut back in
order to deplete nutrient stores in the roots of individual plants and clones.
Pine Removal.
Ideally all pine should be removed from the prarie to reduce shading out of prairie
species and the risk of wildfire. Recognizing this will probably not be acceptable to the
community, the following management actions should be considered. All pines infected
with White Pine Blister Rust should be removed from the present stands of pine. This
will reduce the possibility of further infection. Fruther, selective thinning of
overcrowded stands by removing stunted, understory pines reduces competition for
1
.
.
.
light and soil resources within the stand. This will enable the prairie species to reinvade
the corridor on the North side of the pines as well as enhancing the existing prairie.
Deciduous Tree Removal.
Removal of boxelder, siberian elm, and buckthorn trees will prevent these non-
native species from further colonization of the prairie area and open the canopy,
enhancing the resident prairie. Stumps should be painted with an herbicide mixture,
such as Garlon 4, to prevent resprouting of the stump and minimize damage to other
plants in the area.
2
.
.
.
OVERVIEW
PRESERV ATION VALUE
Natural resource management and native community restoration is an important
aspect in restoring the function of natural features in an area. In enhancing the diversity
found in these natural areas some of the stability and beauty of such areas is preserved.
Prairie and oak savanna management benefits both the natural and human elements of
the community. Natural communities serve as outdoor classrooms, while the physical
process of restoring natuve ecosystems can be used to integrate humans into the natural
environment. Education occurs both officially, through organized activities, and
informally through recreational use and appreciation of the managed area.
The proposed management areas contain remnants of dry prairie and oak savanna
previously common on the glacial outwash plains found along the Mississippi River.
Although much of the area has become overgrown into a closed canopy oak
woodland/forest, several small patches of prairie remain. Active management could be
used to enhance existing dry prairie and oak savanna communities and result in the
restoration of savanna communities. Additionally, management activities will provide
native seed that can be used to reestablish these communities in old fields in the
protected areas.
Overview of Natural Communities
A. Dry sand prairie
This proposed management area most nearly resembles the vegetation of the dry
sand prairie, previously widespread along the Mississippi River. The distribution of dry
prairie has been restricted by fire suppression and agriculture. Open prairie sites are
present in scattered, small areas that were undesireable or unavailable for agriculture.
Periodic fires along the Burlington Northern Railroad right of way probably maintained
the prairie species composition in this area. The remainder of the site was more
accessible to agriculture and grazing. As a result, prairie fragments are found between
areas of pine plantation, oak woodlands with dense understories, and shrublands.
Prairie remnants intermingled with oak savanna and oak woodlands indicate a process
of succession, eventually resulting in a closed canopy woodland that excludes prairie
species. Characteristic species of the dry prairie are little bluestem, Indian grass, and big
bluestem are found in the prairie remnants at this site. However, exotic species such as
smooth brome and Kentucky bluegrass, indicators of past disturbance, are also present.
B. Oak Savanna
The oak savanna community type likely covered much of the area in question. A
closed canopy of younger oaks has developed in the absence of fire, shading out native
prairie species. Oak savanna is characterized by widely spaced bur oak trees with a
largely horizontal, or open-grown, branching pattern.
3
.
.
.
I. GENERAL MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS
The management areas consist of lands owned by the City of Monticello, Wright
County, and Northern States Power Company. Ecological differences as well as
differing managment jurisdictions encourage each of these areas to be further discussed
individually. This document has been provided by the Scientific and Natural Areas
program of the MN Department of Natural Resources as a guide for the enhancement
and management of native prairie and oak savanna communitites. Implementation of the
following recommendations is the responsibility of the City of Monticello, Wright
County, and Northern States Power Company.
CITY OF MONTICELLO
I PUBLIC USE
This segment of prairie is in the former Burmington Northern Railroad right of
way along Highway 75. This location makes it highly accessible. A paved bicycle trail
was installed on top of the grade, further increasing public access. Opportunities for
public education on this mile long stretch of prairie are many, including informational
kiosks and school activities.
II STRUCTURES AND FACILITIES
The City of Monticello has an existing bicycle trail that passes through the
proposed management area. In order to encourage futher educational use of the natural
area, kiosks identifying the ecological features of Prairie Creek Park is recommended at
the entrance to the site. Point of interest signs spaced within the park are recommended
to encourage use and public interest in native prairie. The recent installation of a
culvert has changed not only the topography, but the vegetation composition at one
location.
ACTION 2.1 Design and install permanent informational kiosks at the entrances to the
managment area. The kiosk should discuss what a prairie is, management practices such
as fire, and preservation value. For specific text and locations see management
recommendations for Segment One, Two, Four and Five.
ill MANAGEMENT OF NATURAL FEATURES
Site Description
The city owned property contains a mixture of prairie and overgrown oak
savanna contained in a strip of land along the Burlington Northern Railroad right of
way, between the railroad and Highway 75 west of Monticello. Fires generated during
rail use maintained the native species composition of the prairies and savannas located in
the right of way. The decrease in fire frequency has allowed the encroachment of brush
4
.
.
.
and tree species not native to the sand prairie and oak savanna communities. Native
prarie species present at the site are Bluestem, Indian grass, goldenrod, and prairie rose.
The three-quarter mile site contains scattered remnants of these native communities in an
ideal location to begin educating the public about the history and composition of the
nati ve prairie and oak savanna communities.
Management Recommendations
The site was divided into five management segments (see map). For clarity, suggested
ecological management measures specific to each unit will be discussed separately.
Segment one: River street to Prairie Road
Step 1: Prescribed Burning
Spring burning of the prairie is an effective way of enhancing native prairie
species. Two distinct bum units were identified within Segment one. The first, between
the railroad track and the paved trail contains a significant population of brome grass.
To reduce this, the unit should be burned every year for three years, then evaluated for
native species composition. The second bum unit, between the trail and Highway 75
contains a quality remnant of native prairie. To further enhance the existing species
composition, one spring burn every three years should be conducted. Ideal burn times
would be after the area has begun to green up to most effectively set back cool season
exotic grasses.
ACTION 3.11 Obtain and implement a bum plan for the management area. Use a
backfire to bum unit 1 three years in a row to set back exotics species. Burn unit 2 once
every three years. Expected time requirement: 4 hours to bum the entire segment.
Recommended burning time-frame is 15 April-31 May for all management segments.
Step 2: Woody species removal
The removal of all woody species not native to the sand prairie and oak savanna
not only reduces shade cover but also encourages the growth of prairie grasses and
forbs. Additionally, the removal of these plants reduces the potential for further
colonization by these woody species. All elm, buckthorn, honeysuckle, boxelder, ash,
Siberian elm, and the aspen clone found in Segment one should be removed. To prevent
resprouting herbicide should be painted onto cut stumps. Direct application of
herbicides prevents damage to surrounding, desireable plant species.
Two trees, a bur oak and a large Eastern red cedar should be left on the site.
These two species are native to the prairie/oak savanna communities.
ACTION 3:12
a) Cut all non-native tree species found in Segment one. Apply a 12% solution
5
.
.
.
?f S1~lon 4 (0: oth~r herbi~i~e) to the stumps to preven resprouting. One or two
mdlvlduals tramed m herbIcIde use should follow behind those cuttincr brush to
. . . .::>
mlmmlze contact.
b) All slash should be immediately removed from the site to minimize shading
effects on prairie species.
Estimated time: 16 hours using chainsaw, loppers, and herbicides. Using
volunteers, a group of 10 could complete the task in four hours.
Step 3: Seed collection
The native species present in Segment 1 will produce significant amounts of seed
after a spring burn. To take advantage of this volunteers (school classes, citizens,e tc.)
could be used to harvest this native seed source. Seeds and germinated seedlings can
then .be planted in less diverse areas to encourage recolonization of native prairie
specIes.
ACTION 3. Identify native forb and grass species. Spring blooming plants will be ready
to harvest in August, while grass species could be collected in the fall of each year after
seeds have hardened, after the first hard frost (September). Seed harvesting is optimal
following a Spring burn. This indigenous seed source can then be used to reestablish
native species in highly disturbed areas.
Estimated time: 15-20 people for a 3-4 hour work day. Several classes
(approximately 20 minutes of actual seed collection) could also achieve a good harvest
in Segment one.
Segment two: Prairie Road to the spruce/pine stand
Step 1: Prescribed burning
Once again, spring burns can be used to further enhance the existing species
composition in the prairie/ oak savanna communities. Unit three, from the railroad to trail
should be burned two years in a row after green up, followed by a year off to evaluate
the progress. If bluegrass remains a dominant species continue with two years burning
and a year off. Once native species become dominant a single burn every three years
would be most effective in enhancing this prairie community.
In unit four, from the trail to Highway 75, the vegetation is dominated by brome
grass. This unit should be burned for three years in a row watching for improvement in
native composition. Time burns to coincide with green up.
ACTION 3.21: Burn Segment (2) two in two burn compartments unit three (between
6
.
.
.
the railroad and the trail) and unit four (from the trail to Highway 75.)
Step 2: Seed collection
The native species present in Segment two will produce seed after a spring burn.
To take advantage of this volunteers (school classes, citizens,etc.) could be used to
harvest this native seed source. Seeds and germinated seedlings can then be planted in
less diverse areas to encourage recolonization of native prairie species.
ACTION 3.22 Identify native forb and grass species. Spring blooming plants will be
ready to harvest in August, while grass species could be collected in the fall of each year
after seeds have hardened, after the first hard frost (September). Seed harvesting is
optimal following a Spring burn. This indigenous seed source can then be used to
reestablish native species in highly disturbed areas. Classes or volunteers could grow
seedlings of selected species for reestablishing other areas.
Estimated time: 15-20 people for a 3-4 hour work day. Several classes
(approximately 20 minutes of actual seed collection) could also achieve a good harvest
in Segment two.
Step 3: Pine Removal
Ideally all pine should be removed from the prarie to reduce shading out of prairie
species and the risk of wildfire. Recognizing this will probably not be acceptable to the
community, the following management actions should be considered. Over the span of
about three years, pines should be removed to achieve a savanna-like atmosphere with
spacing of approximately 15 feet apart. In the first stand of pines, selective thinning of
overcrowded stands by removing stunted or "pairs" of pines should be considered to
reduce competition for light and soil resources within the stand. In the second stand of
pines, individuals to be immediately removed are those damaged during trail
construction. This will enable the prairie species to reinvade the corridor on the North
side of the pines enhancing the existing prairie as well as the pine stand.
ACTION 3.33 Remove diseased and standing dead pines in the Segment 2 to achieve a
spatial distribution of approximately 15 feet. All removal activities should occur in
winter to preclude damage to the site.
Estimated time: 4 trained-labor days to remove pines as well as deciduous non-
nati ve species as described in step 4 (chainsaws and heavy equipment necessary to
remove full size trees).
7
.
.
.
Step 4: Non-native woodv vegetation removal
In the initial stand of pine (approximately 13 Norway Maple trees) all of the small
eastern red cedar should be removed to reduce the non-native trees and eastern red
cedar understory within the stand. In the remaining area, all boxelder, aspen, prickly ash,
rasberries, and eastern red cedar should be cut. The stumps and shrubs with the
exception of eastern red cedar should be treated with herbicide to allow further
expansion by resident prairie species.
ACTION 3.24 All non-native deciduous woody vegetation should be removed.
Additionally, all small eastern red cedar should be removed from the first stand of pine.
Trained individuals should apply herbicide to stumps after other persons have moved
out of the area. All slash should be removed from the site.
Estimated time: see step 3.
Step 5: Installation of an informative sign
An informational sign explaining the presence and structure aof the oak savanna
and dry prairie in this area as opposed to the present stands of pine trees native to
northern Minnesota is suggested. Sample text found in figure:
ACTION 3.25: Install informational sign comparing oak savanna and pine woodlands
Segment three: Spruce stand to Liefert Road
Step 1: Prescribed Burning
The entire segment can be treated as a single burn unit. The unit, including the
area under the pines, should be burned two years in a row, followed by a year off. At
this point, native species composition should be evaluated. If exotic species have been
sufficently erradicated, one bum every three years will maintain and encourage native
species diversity. The third year, the native species composition of Segment three
should be reviewed and the burn plan adjusted accordingly.
ACTION 3.31 Bum Segment 3 two years in a row with a backfire to suppress woody
and herbaceous non-native species.
Estimated burn time: 4 hours.
8
.
.
.
Step 2: Seed collection
The native species present in Segment three will produce seed after a spring burn.
To take advantage of this volunteers (school classes, citizens,e tc.) could be used to
harvest this native seed source. Seeds and germinated seedlings can then be planted in
less diverse areas to encourage recolonization of native prairie species.
ACTION 3.32 Identify native forb and grass species. Spring blooming plants will be
ready to harvest in August, while grass species could be collected in the fall of each year
after seeds have hardened, after the first hard frost (September). Seed harvesting is
optimal following a Spring burn. This indigenous seed source can then be used to
reestablish native species in highly disturbed areas.
Estimated time: 15-20 people for a 3-4 hour work day. Several classes
(approximately 20 minutes of actual seed collection) could also achieve a good harvest
in Segment three.
Step 3: Pine Removal.
Ideally all pine should be removed from the prarie to reduce shading out of prairie
species and the risk of wildfire. Recognizing this will probably not be acceptable to the
community, the following management actions should be considered. Over the span of
about three years, pines should be removed to achieve a savanna-like atmosphere with
spacing of approximately 15 feet apart. One priority in removal are those pines infected
with White Pine Blister Rust. This will reduce the possibility of further pine infection.
Additionally all low-hanging limbs should be trimmed above eight feet in height to
reduce fire hazard during burning.
ACTION 3.33 Remove all pines infected with White pine blister rust and trim all limbs
above eight feet in height.
Expected time: five labor days to remove pines and other non-native woody
vegetation (see Step 4).
Step 4: Non-native woodv species removal
Within the spruce stand all eastern red cedar and elm should be removed, and the
elm stumps painted with herbicide to prevent resprouting. East of the stand, elm,
honeysuckle and buckthorn should also be cut and treated with herbicides to reduce
shade on prairie species. All slash should be immediately removed from the site.
9
.
.
.
ACTION 3.34 Eastern red cedar, elm, honeysuckle, and buckthorn found within and
surrounding the spruce/pine stand should be removed and all stumps except eastern red
cedar, treated with herbicide. Trained individuals should apply herbicide to stumps after
other persons have moved out of the area. All slash should be removed from the site.
Estimated time combined with pine removal and trimming (see step 4) is 5 labor
days.
Segment 4: Liefert Road to the creek
Step 1: Prescribed burning
This area should be burned as a single unit in the spring three years in a row to most
effectively set back the encroaching sumac and herbaceous non-native species. In this
area there is a significant population of poison ivy. During burning, the crew should be
kept out of the smoke produced as it can irritate lungs, etc.
ACTION 3.41 Burn Segment 4 three years in a row with a backfire. Special care should
be taken to avoid the smoke from poison ivy in the area.
Estimate time: 4 hours.
Step 2: Seed collection
The native species present in Segment four will produce seed after a spring burn.
To take advantage of this volunteers (school classes, citizens,e tc.) could be used to
harvest this native seed source. Seeds and germinated seedlings can then be planted in
less diverse areas to encourage recolonization of native prairie species.
ACTION 3.42 Identify native forb and grass species. Spring blooming plants will be
ready to harvest in August, while grass species could be collected in the fall of each year
after seeds have hardened, after the first hard frost (September). Seed harvesting is
especially beneficial following a Spring burn. This indigenous seed source can then be
used to reestablish native species in highly disturbed areas.
Estimated time: 15-20 people for a 3-4 hour work day. Several classes
(approximately 20 minutes of actual seed collection) could also achieve a good harvest
in Segment four.
1 0
.
.
.
Step 3: Woodv Regrowth
This area approaching the creek is a more transitional environment between the
dry prairie and the moister lowland forests. In the creek area, deciduous species such as
elm should be ~ft. However, the eastern red cedar present on the site should be thinned
to a spatial distribution of one every 75 feet. This will reduce the dominance of this
colonizing species and enhance both the prairie and deciduous species already present.
ACTION 3.43 Eastern red cedar should be thinned to one every 75 feet.
Step 4: Sumac control
After a spring bum, sumac that has been burned, will develop new growth. Twice
during the growing season, new growth should be cut back in order to deplete nutrient
stores in the roots of individual plants and clones.
To start sumac removal without a spring burn, the entire stand should be cut on 1
July and the slash compacted on the site. This will make a dense mat of fuel for a burn
the following spring. Continued cutting, as described above would follow this spring
burn until the sumac is eradicated.
ACTION 3.44 Following a spring bum, sumac should be monitored and new growth
removed just before it hardens (approximately 1 July and 15 August). This should be
continued until sumac has been erradicated, and may take several years. Brush saws and
loppers are very effective in cutting sumac.
Each cutting will take approximately 4 labor days. Initial cutting of sumac,
without a spring burn is estimated to take 7-8 labor days.
SEGMENT FIVE: Old house location
Step I: Conifer removal
Again this is a moist lowland environment. Deciduous species such as elm and
ash should be encouraged. To do this, all of the conifers present should be removed.
Many are small, recently established individuals and thus could be fairly easily removed.
ACTION 3. 51 All conifers east of the creek should be removed.
Estimated time 7-8 labor days.
1 1
.
.
.
Step 2: Informational kiosk
An introductory kiosk about the history of the site, it's purpose as a natural area,
and an explanation of the species present should be placed in this picnic-type area. The
differences to be expected between this moist environment and the sand prairie and oak
savanna could also be discussed.
ACTION 3.52 Install an informational kiosk near the entrance to the park. See
suggested text in figure
1 2
Kiosks
. Segment One
Prairies thrive on occasional fires. Fires help break down
accumulated dead plant material and release nutrients into the soil. Once
the often-thick litter layer is removed, the suna can warm the soil earlier
in the spring. The warmth stimulates early seed germination and
promotes the growth of native warm season grasses, which dominate the
prairie plant community.
Prairie plants are adapted to fire, while many species not native to
prairies are damaged by fires. The prairie you see on either side of the
trail was formerly revitalized by periodic fires frequently started by
lightning, Native Americans. Native Americans hunted wildlife attracted
to the lush green growth that followed fires.
.
In this century, sparks from the railroad started fires that maintained the
native prairie composition of this area. However, the prevention of
wildfires on prairies and the prevalence of agriculture have allowed non-
native plant species to crowd out many native species. To the North side
of the trail you can see an example of a prairie with a high native species
composition. However, to the South brome grass, a non-native species,
indicates disturbance of the natural processes regulating the prairie. By
initiating a program of controlled burning and removal of invading
deciduous tree species we can gradually improve the quality of both of
these prairie fragments. Over time, the prairie south of the trail should
come to resemble that to the north of the trail. Some of the species
present are big bluestem, little blue stem, Indian grass, stiff and gray
goldenrod, purple prairie clover, and leadplant.
Segment Two
On dry soils, oak savanna served as a transition zone between oak
woodlands and dry prairies. Oak savanna is characterized by opengrown
and multi-stemmed bur oak trees forming a canopy with 10-70% cover.
Prairie plants tolerant of partial shade are present under this canopy.
Segment Four
Prairie Creek Park Management
.
.
.
.
The dry prairie and oak savanna communities changed significantly after
European settlement. Farming and the absence of fire have caused the
most dramatic changes in this landscape.
Most of the land in the area suitable for farming had been cleared
andplowed by the early 1900's. During the early 1930's, pine trees were
planted to stabilize the blowing and drifting sand fields. With natural
fires suppressed, other trees began filling in the prairie.
The increasing rarity of the dry prairie and oak savanna encouraged the
City of Monticello to begin restoring the area to a more natural state. In
order to restore these communities, pine and other trees had to be
removed, and a prescribed burning program was begun. Historically, elk,
buffalo, and the fires that swept across the landscape helped maintain
these open communities. Elk and buffalo grazed the land keeping trees and
shrubs from invading. Prairies and savannas were formerly revitalized by
periodic fires started by lightning or Native Americans.
The native grasses, wildflowers, and trees that grow here have adapted to
fire. Fire helps break down accumulated dead plant material and release
nutrients into the soil. Periodic burning keeps the plants not native to this
area from replacing native praire plants. Managers also reduce the number
of trees and shrubs invading a praire and savanna by girdling and
frequently burning. Girdling (removing a strip of bark from around a tree)
eventually kills the tree by forcing it to use up energy stored int eh root
system. On your walk throught eh prairie and savanna, look for girdled or
burned trees.
Segment Five
. Prairie Creek Park
This public nature preserve was established to protect the dry prairie and
oak savanna communities. The site surrounds the recreational trail,
between the railroad tracks and Highway 75. The site is protected and
managed by the City of Monticello, with cooperation from Wright County
and the Burlington Northern Railroad. Prairie Creek Park is located on
sandy soils deposited by the melting of the last glaciers.
Natural Communities of Prairie Creek Park
You are standing in an old home used to stand. The creek running through
the area maintains a higher soil moisture than much of the nearby
.
.
.
farmland. Immediately surrounding you is an example of a moist prairie
forest mix. In this area, trees such as American elm, ash and bur oaks are
common. As you travel along the trail, you will soon pass into an example
of the once common oak savanna and dry prairie communities.
Both of these communities are dominated by different types of prame
grasses, although a vairety of other plants grow here. Each plant species
grow in a particular area depending on many factors, such as soil
temperature, soil moisture, and fire frequency. Some of these plant
species are little bluestem, Indian grass,
.
.
--
Year One Year Two Year Three
Segment one: Prescribed burns: Prescribed Burns: Prescribed Burns
River street to Unit One Unit One Unit One
Prairie Road Unit Two
Seed Collection Seed Collection Seed Collection
U nit One Unit One
Install informational
sign
Woody Species Removal
Segment two: Prescribed Burn Prescribed Burn Prescribed Burn
Prairie Road to the U nit Three U ni t Three Unit Four
spruce/pine stand Unit Four Unit Four
Seed Collection Seed collection Seed collection
Unit Four
Pine removal (winter) Pine removal Pine removal
Non-native woody
species removal
Install lnfornlational
Sign
Segment three: Prescribed Burns Prescribed Burns
Spruce stand to (entire segment is a
Liefert Road single burn unit.)
Seed collection Seed collection -
Pine removal (winter) Pine removal Pine removal
Non-native woody
specie removal
Segment 4: Liefert Prescribed burn Prescribed burn Prescribed burn
Road to the creek (entire segment is a
sincle burn unit)
Seed collection Seed collection Seed collection
Sumac control Sumac control Sumac control
1 July I July I July
15 August 15 August 15 August
SEGMENT FIVE: Conifer removal
Old house location
Install informational
kiosk
City of IVlonticello: Table of management recommendations
.
.
.
MONTISSISSIPPI PARK. WRIGHT COUNTY
I PUBLIC USE
Recreational use of Montississippi Park is expected. Presently walking and
cross-country ski trails exist within the park. Access to a fishing pier is provided by
entrance roads and some vehical use of existing service roads occurs.
II STRUCTURES AND FACILITIES
Montississippi Park is acessed by a single entrance road. Service roads and trails
allow access to a parking lot, fishing pier, and most areas of the park. All are maintained
by the park.
III MANAGEMENT OF NATURAL PEA TURES
Site Description
The site contained in Wright County park shows evidence of past management
for oak savanna and dry prairie enhancement. In some areas, significant native prairie
species are present in an old field or pasture area, while oak savanna remnants and pine
plantations surround this open area. Previous burning and limited pine removal have
been effective in preserving small areas of native dry prairie in Montississippi Park.
Viable remnants are present that, with further management, could become still more
diverse and stable examples of native dry prairie.
Management Recommendations
The following are suggested land management measures for Montississippi Park.
Step 1: Prescribed Burning
A yearly prescribed burning plan is of primary concern in enhancing native prairie.
species. Such a burning schedule should prove effective in erradicating existing
populations of Kentucky bluegrass and smooth brome, while encouraging the
expansion of native populations. Burn breaks should be maintained by mowing,
blacklining or raking in order to have the lowest impact on the existing communities.
ACTION 3.1 Delineate and maintain burn breaks around existing prairie, including the
strip of prairie on the bluff above the Mississippi River. Achieve a quality prairie
through annual burning for three years in areas with bluegrass and brome as major
species components. Once native species become more established conduct prescribed
burns once every 2-5 years to maintain ecological diversity.
1 3
.
.
.
Step 2: Pine Removal
As pine is not a native component to the dry prairie and oak savanna ecosystems
in this area, ideally all pine should be removed. Pine stands in this area increase the
hazard involved in the controlled burning required to maintain native prairie species.
Isolated individuals or groups of pines may be desireable in maintaining shade along
trails within the park where it is impossible to relocate a trail. However, eventually all of
the existing pine plantation should be removed and fire treatment used to return the site
to nati ve prairie.
ACTION 3.2 Pines adjacent to the prairie should be removed to minimize fire hazard.
Pine could be cut and stacked in piles during the summer for winter burning after snow
fall.
Step 3: Eastern Red Cedar Removal
Eastern red cedar Uuniper) has become prominent in the prairie area due to fire
suppression. All mature eastern red cedar found in the prairie management area should
be cut.
ACTION 3.3 Cedar should be cut and piled in the stump area, where ground cover is
dominated by needles from the tree to minimize damage to nearby prairie species.
14
.
.
.
NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY
I PUBLIC USE
Property owned by Northern States Power would be open for educational
activities. Public use near the meteorological tower, air sampling station, and other
structures is discouraged. However, the prairie area just outside the fence surrounding
the plant are an ideal location achieving visible results in natural resource management.
Additionally, this area is a prime location for further public education concerning the
communities native to the area.
II STRUCTURES AND FACILITIES
Northern States Power Monticello Nuclear Generating plant is subject to
regulation by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. All prairie management techniques
must concur to these regulations. The meteorological and air sampling stations must
remain buffered from public use. High tension electrical lines must also be considered in
establishing burn plans.
III MANAGEMENT OF NA11JRAL FEATURES
Site Description
The site appears to be overgrown oak savanna. The most southern tip of this sub
site containing the most obvious savanna characteristics. South along the Mississippi,
contains a mixture of oak savanna and oak woodland! savanna. Both show signs of
disturbance. A leafy spurge infestation is present in the more open, oak savanna areas.
Two patches of prairie are present in this sub-site. Both contain disturbance indicator
species, one with sumac, but also a variety of native prairie species.
Recommendations
The following management recommendation can be enacted sequentially to
address the ecological concerns in the second and third sites, on Northern States Power
owned property.
Step 1: Prescribed Burning
The fragments of prairie abutting the gates to the NSP Monticello Generating
Plant are in an ideal position for management through prescribed bums. Service roads
form fire breaks on nearly all sides of the two fragments of prairie. Thus using backfires
to bum from Highway 75 to the entrance road (Unit one), and from the entrance road to
the unpaved service road (Unit 2) would be the most effective initial managment
technique to employ on NSP property. The location of these, prairie fragments just
outside the entrance to the plant provides an excellent opportunity for community
education with regard to prairie enhancement and restoration.
ACTION 3.1 Use backfires to burn the two burn units just outside the gates to the NSP
plant. Northern States Power property. For safety in Unit two, burning under the high
1 5
.
.
.
tension power lines should be conducted with adequate wind to blow the smoke away
from the lines and the burn crew.
Step 2: Seed Collection
In order to provide seed for restoration of old fields in the area. existing prairie
areas should be harvested. A combine or volunteers can be used during the fall of the
year to accomplish this end. The prairie restoration area as well as 'B' to the west of the
power plant are diverse existing seed banks. The Department of Transportation or
prairie resoration companies are potential sources of necessary equipment.
ACTION 3.3 Harvest seed from existing prairie.
As restoration efforts in the existing, more accessible portions of the Northern
States Power Company property further oak savanna and dry prairie restoration efforts
could be implemented. Between the plant and Highway 75 is an area of approximately
20 acres of oak woodland. The presence of several large, open grown oaks and a spiny
shrub layer indicate a history of grazing in the area. This disturbance combined with fire
suppression has encouraged the formation of a closed canopy woodland from a
previous savanna structure. To reverse this trend, opening of this overgrown savanna
woodland area is highly encouraged.
Step 4: Oak Removal
Opening the canopy is an important first step in reestablishing oak savanna in an
overgrown oak woodland. The oak woodland found on Northern States Power
property west of the plant could be returned to oak savanna by such a thinning of the
canopy. A relatively cost-effective manner to achieve this end is opening the area to a
timber or fuelwood sale. Winter harvesting of trees in designated areas by the public
creates an open canopy with minimum impact on the underlying soil and shrub layers.
Cutting should be restricted to winter after the ground has frozen and there is a
continuous snow cover.
Bur oaks with a diameter greater than 12" and occasional multi-stemmed clusters
should be identified as desired components of the savanna ecosystem. Strive for a
spatial distribution of 25 feet between individual trees. For aesthetic purposes, a screen
of vegetation should be left along the fence surrounding the plant. A timber appraisal
of the remaining standing forest will identify the amount an value of timber available for
harvest.
ACTION 3.4 Designate and delineate areas of the forest harvestable in a single season.
1 6
.
.
.
Identify individual trees to be preserved and conduct timber appraisal on remaining
trees.
Auction timber harvesting rights and provide adequate information to insure the
protection of the habitat. Stumps will have to be painted with herbicides. A 12%
solution of Garlon 4 in water (or, in winter, in basal bark oil) has been effective in
preventing resprouting of these stumps.
Step 5: Prescribed Burning for Oak Savanna
Prescribed burns in this area can be addressed in two portions. The first, Unit 1, is
found between Highway 75 and the fence. In this area, 3 years in a row of spring
backfires would be effective in setting back exotic grass species present. Burns are
recommended in late April under dry conditions, with temperatures of 60-75 F.
Additional management considerations to control the sumac population is mowing every
six weeks after a spring burn.
From the fenceline into the newly opened oak savanna. In this area, spring bums
will help eliminate the shrub layer and allow the proliferation of prairie grasses and forbs
under the remaining oaks.
ACTION 3. Between the Monticello Generating Plant and Highway 75 is an area of-
prairie and newly formed oak savanna that would benefit from prescribed burning. Unit
one, the prairie segment should be burned three years in a row with backt1re to control
the population of non-native grasses present.
Unit one should also be mowed twice, every six weeks, after a spring burn to
eliminate the resident sumac population. Mowing approximately 1 July and 15 August,
as new growth on the sumac is beginning to harden, will starve the root system of the
entire sumac clone.
Unit two is the newly formed oak savanna. Once this canopy is opened, burn
units within the savanna should be exablished and firebreaks maintained that this area
can most effectively be managed to encourage native prairie species.
17
.~; ,./~,
)/
/
/
/ o~J~~~'l_- ii~ Uj;
/ =,,, "'L'::J<'':::>r-~ ,~"",
A .-"' ~.;~;,;~~.,. .-""-'" ~ v
/ ,..~,;~ ~ :,~~~~!'i;':~7l-"'~ /
:;.~ L1 ' ~ ~::..:~"'~.;j~ r",:/-/
~ ~ ~] -';e-....' '-&;"'1' "r...,.'1 ,;y..'- . 1//
..0 ~j I ~ ... -l \.\0:.'(....0 ..~.*~-.....+ i // ~
~ ....~~..'-~~~l-"lII;;~..~:V$~......~"rt;$,4 . / ~
.; " "'..._.:...,. "".......... _ - i' ;"':f.i?>' -,< ~:"'''''\'' " '/ ~
.. --' .....~~. .<,;-0' .~.' ,,' ". . '" Ai'"' /i .....
, . _ .__ -1o..:.! _-0> ~...,^'" - i ~ (.
f" ~ : ~ .... ') "1-if.! ".~,!.:: I:C I,' f;<,.l~1 ',' -/ / ~ ~: U .~"ii
'" 4 ''t & (Y. l:..Llli._,rtl4r.,. ."...... I /~ 'IE t" &;
.. . ", ,.. _-.J I' j'. ,. ~". -'~ ,~ - , [~
"" .... ~ _., _ ",.j:!l . I ~O ,,~""'"
/ .,' ~ # ''''"'~,''''.au-''"''{.O';'/'''y: f' ""
_'.' ~-' ",~'c. ': 'IOf':"" ~'<I"<' .'
'."r.....------... 0", --"-. ~',-::'::J:'...~ 'I' , ....0
/ ,.: , ,., ' ,^'\ " ~ ~ ~'.-4';} ;:.
/"S':'~3;_:~:1;-:-;L~~-:~ r ", /'~/ ,fj - ~~
~. :.?'P'~:i \ "; " ~~..'~~~'fiv:t t7~' ~'l" I., rt.;' ~ ,
:_'_ ' , . ""~~,.,.....,..,-'''',. 0.'" N,V t:j ,..:.: '"
._' t. >-";". >-__. ".):~:.;.\-,-" I.; 1/ '<, ~
I '-,.j.;":~~:",,,,"'----:"'-"~''''-~// .,", ~.. -------
__~, _~~ ~:.-~c-:;~0) ~ ~i./ ~,:.----=-----.:
, ,_. ---'-.-~,.....____ "_ :$-":-' /~ ~~,o.' ""
/ ~ .\..l'.-~':~~"~~";",":- r--'?'''~ J
"_ . <~.... ~ l;r ....
/ oi:8 ;. ' . .,,~,.. ../ .'.1 I)i-::f' i
/ $~o _---A..Ll"".; .,..~.\~\..<~...",t;.; . . 1'1 ",' t"-~
-1Z':Z" --.~r..,..-I>"O~.tJ ~//., --..;
/ ~'"; ;,.:j3 .:;z.'~:~)4fi" . , ~ Q'
"'~" ~ ~. ~.~-~!:i1'::<.; -. : , .!' ~
"'~J< · ~"'. ". ',' 0' / ~ ~
81'"10 ,,-.'9_~Jr,_': .Ie&'" 'I . ~ ~
z~z ....-t~, ~,;::r -;. '" -ol 1. ':Ir/ . ~ "
D~ !~S~ ::,-i,.j f~,l j" . Ifry / .:. ~~ (..
g~-( ~~i _~;. ,," I ~~/ //" ~~.$ ~. ,.-'.' b
.~; .~. *' ," / .. " ~~ ~ ~
n8il1..-t;. ,(,(i. // J'.' ~ ,,(;-. ~ ',_____---1..-
j8...J" ~ //' ':.". ~ P ~ --........
~C ' "^-(,~' ." . .. -l\.-', ~~ --:--- ,,/;, ~
;I!~ 11.'''' - .i::; c..~ .
~, ... .... ':i, ,"--- ,,~ ;'
.,:.' "" ~' ". . rt.; ~= ....""-
..,. ,'" _ .... "'''> ~ .:- V
... ".,./.... ,~.' ... 5,- .
;:; '.;;0 .' ,', . -rrC 0 ~.; ""
~Ci ~~~ .' / ;:.~::,~:/ ~...., l~' ~.... -"-'---
c-(,O,C :tw. . ". '...:....~ ~ ""~;: 'b-~. .----'-"-'--~
-.; s..Ci t'.. ~'!. ~ )
." / .;:; ".' ", '
..."" ..' , '."" '. .. "... ---""-'-----
V /. '\ If ;$"ii},~.:t ~o
.,. ~ ,"Y ~..,. ~ ~'. ~"l;I1
.. .q; ','::' ~""; t I
.tiI ~~":f tI .~: ' -
r" . . !t/' .I: ....
.. .:,., ,fj_....J ~- - --- ~
$'
~
,
~~O,C
- ~-....----'"
,/ if
..j/ .
/// /
/J///
;,~/ /
'I"'V//
//
""
.'" _~;I
.
'-
-,;'~~-
~
.
.......-...........................
._-.-._~
;' ~
(', ','
-'T>'~- ,4,;
. ".. t- - ~
/.,'.,"" .' :~ .~
.' " '. 1:,' ..... ...; ~..
'/ "~:l. "', " '"0--
./;.;,:j ....::' +- ~'" -.....-
0" ~,,";---.) ~ (, ,
~-.\ ~ .$.~-'
u 0 ,";
.c....-;: ~ .."-.__ ~-
r:;' ~ .-." -:-."
.~f~i~~~;:'
....f;,."". , ,:,'011'. :,;;;r- ''''''~\;;'''''' /
.....,. h..~. . . :i',..,r'~ : .:.:... ~<: ~ '" ~
,.,,/;"")..,."1. ~~ ~'~".'~ I, - b
," 4.~~ ~7 t"~ ~ i,ll> .... 2>
~~~.:' .~":././' ,~'(5/ "
~:." i;"--";~~';'" '." '_.i
'0:-' "'< ~ '
4k . t~..~~--;
~/
///
/
(/
I
/
j//
~--
.-----
//
/
//
/------------------
//
\~
\ S S /_/
c:, ----------
C, :/
"
'.
-.71
...../"....
/
~/....
We All Love Monticello!
· Let's Show It!
Dear Youth Organization,
We'd like your help! Through a coordinated effort of the Monticello Area Chamber of Commerce, Monticello
Community Partners (Mcp) and the City of Monticello, we are developing a new project called "Youth Community
Enhancement Project" or YCEP. YCEP initiated from the Random Acts of Kindness survey that you and/or your peers
filled out inJanuary. YCEP gives organizations, such as yours, the opportunity to "Adopt-A-Block" or "Adopt-A-Park" and
take pride in keeping the area clean and attractive. Your organization would be responsible for:
. Cleaning the area at least once a month (but we would encourage more!)
The City will provide garbage bags and trash pick up and rubber gloves will be provided
· Suggestions for beautifying your area, Depending on your ideas, we can help you submit a proposal to the
City or area residents and businesses to fund improvements and beautification activities,
· Notifying the City if you believe there is additional maintenance work that needs to be done in your area
(Example: lights burnt out, hazardous waste needing to be disposed ot...)
.
This would be a year long commitment with the option to renew each year. (Of course the winter months will
be easy!) Why get involved with YCEP? Lots of reasons! Most important, it's an opportunity to make some positive
changes in Monticello, The program is designed to encourage community pride and responsibility, Some of the other
benefits to participating organizations include:
. A sign that will designate your adoption area
· Service hours, if needed by your organization, from YCEP,
· Educational opportunities on developing plans, costs and budgets if a beautification project is seen
as necessary,
. We are also working on an annual Thank You celebration for pc:rticipants,
YCEP Committee
We'd like to see this project start in late May so please
respond as soon as possible so we can help you choose your
adoption area and you can get started!
Sincerely,
.
~.
YOUTH COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT!
.
As a result of the Random Acts of Kindness survey, A committee has been formed to
follow through and work with the kids in the community by listening and acting on
their ideas on how we all can make Monticello our kind of place.
Friday, March 21st, 8:00am: The first meeting was held at the Chamber office.
Kitty Baltos; Mam Flicker; Ann Richards (Monti Times); Michele Hertwig
We have focused on ADOPT-A-BLOCK: Kids adopt a block or zone and take responsibility in keeping it litter free.
sidewalks cleared of snow, beautification, etc.
IDEAS ON HOW WE CAN SET THIS PLAN INTO ACTION:
· Set-up guidelines. Kitty will talk to Roger Mack about it. Then we will send out flyers.
(Safety when cleaning up. Where kids should put garbage bags, street sweeping schedule etc.)
· Set up zones to "adopt". We will be placing a sign on each zone recognizing the group that has
adopted it. (In the same idea as Adopt A Highway)
· Contact youth group organizations (churches, sport groups etc)
. It has been decided to go through area organizations & clubs, instead of schools, as they have
adult supervision and it could be carried out through the summer months.
(I have received a list of organizations & churches from Cathy Schuman)
· Set up a meeting for supervisors of these groups. For funding needs for flowers, etc. have the group
come up with an itemized plan so we can take it to city council for possible funding.
· Set up a forum about concerns kids see when they are out cleaning up their zones.
· Stories in the Times to promote the l'Adopt A Block" program and community involvement.
· Work with other committees to coordinate plans they have for cleaning up and beautification
projects.
* Pam Campbell (MCP Design Committee)
* Fran Fair
Orange arm bands, rubber gloves, garbage bags, laminating signs: are items that we will see if area
businesses/city could donate.
I will let you know when the next meeting will be held Everyone's invited to attend!
~anks!
'-:Iichele Hertwig