City Council Agenda Packet 12-14-1998
'.
AGEN A
REGULAR MEETING - MON ICELLO CITY COUNCIL
Monday, December 14,1998 - 7 p.m.
Mayor: Bill Fair
Council Members: Clint Herbst, Brian Stumpf, R ger Carlson, Bruce Thielen
1. Call to order.
2.
A.
Approval of minutes ofthe special eeting held November 18, 1998.
B. Approval of minutes of the regular eeting held November 23, 1998.
3. Consideration of adding items to the agend
4. Citizens comments/petitions, requests, and omplaints.
5. Consent agenda.
A. Consideration of fund transfers for 998.
.
B.
Consideration of ratifying union co tract renewal.
C. Consideration of a preliminary plat or an 80-10t residential subdivision known as
Rolling Woods. Applicant, G.P. L d Corporation.
D. Consideration of approving final pa ment on high school storm sewer, Project 97-
07C - Arcon Construction.
E. Consideration of a resolution reques ing State approval of Highway 25 access at
Chelsea Road, School Boulevard, d Dundas Road.
t1dd ~d ~
6.
F. Considcration of employment of pr fessional services for materials testing and
special inspections for the Monticello Community and Training Center.
C/O') 'WWI~ eJ~ ItfWv\
Consideration of items removed from the c nsent agenda for discussion.
7.
Public Hearing--Consideration of resolutio ordering plans and specifications-- Tnmk
Highway 25 Project.
8.
Adoption Hearing--Consideration ofresolufon adopting 1999 budget and tax levy.
'.
9.
Consideration of resolution awarding sale 0 '$3,000,000 G.O. improvement bonds.
.
.
.
Agenda
Monticello City Council
December 14, 1998
Page 2
10. Consideration of retainage reduction on w stewater treatment plant, Project 93-14C -
with Adolfson & Peterson.
11. Consideration of traffic signal improveme s at the intersection of Highway 25 and
County Road 75.
12. Consideration of petition from residents fo traffic control and enforcements in the
Meadow Oak and Oak Ridge subdivision.
13. Consideration of reviewing bids for genera or for booster pump station, City Project 98-
24C, and consideration of award of contrac for purchase of same.
14. Consideration of reviewing bids for replac ment of 1984 I-ton Dodge pickup for the
wastewater treatment plant.
15. Consideration of purchasing the Daniel Ja es property at 1705 County Road 39 adjacent
to the City's biosolids facility.
16.
Consideration of salary schedule adjustme s for 1999.
17. Consideration of a request for an amendme t to a conditional use permit PUD within the
PZM zoning district, and amendments to H t Boulevard street vacation boundaries.
Applicant, Monticello-Big Lake Communit Hospital District.
18. Consideration of adopting amendments to ity/Township agreement removing the
"Southwest Area Concept Plan" as an attac ment to the agreement.
19. Consideration of adopting amendments to jellberg West sanitary sewer extension
agreement.
20. Consideration of bills for the first half of D cember 1998.
21. Adjournment.
~f. _ ~~~ol'ss-~ e;
.
.
.
MINU ES
SPECIAL MEETING - MON ICELLO CITY COUNCIL
Wednesday, November 18, 1998 - 7:30 p.m.
Members Present: Bill Fair, Clint Herbst, Brian S umpf, Roger Carlson, Bruce Thielen
Members Absent: None
A special meeting of the City Council was held fo the purpose of consideration of authorizing
the execution and delivery of a ground lease and lease-purchase agreement, and approving and
authorizing issuance of public project revenue bon s and execution of related documents.
Mayor Fair and staff reported that at a special mee ing on Monday, November 9, the HRA
rejected bids for lease revenue bonds for the corn unity center due to receipt of a letter from
Councilmembers Stumpf and Herbst and Mayor-E ect Roger Belsaas indicating their intent to
terminate financing for the community center proj ct.
Mayor Fair requested that Councilmembers indica e whether or not they would like to accept
public comment at this meeting. The majority of ity Council members stated that they did not
want to take additional public comment at this poi t in the project.
Mr. Rusty Fifield of Ehlers & Associates explaine that based on action taken by the HRA and
City Council on November 9, Ehlers & Associates has worked with bond counsel to prepare
language to disclose the letter and its implications 0 potential investors, evaluate options for
issuing bonds, and secure reasonable financing for the project. After researching financing
alternatives, Temporary Public Project Revenue B nds were proposed, which would avoid
unnecessary high interest rates for taxpayers and ould allow the City to enter into construction
contracts. Permanent financing would occur only f and when the facility is built. Mr. Fifield
noted that the bond issue was structured to protect the bondholders and the credit rating of the
City from the potential of termination of the proje t.
The underwriting proposal from R.J. Steichen & ompany to purchase the bonds at an interest
rate of not greater than 4.50% and a price of not Ie s than 99% of par was proposed subject to the
following conditions:
1. Prior to closing, the City will depo it with the Trustee sufficient funds to pay
discount and all costs of issuance.
2. The budget for 1999 contains an irr vocable appropriation of funds to pay interest
due on August 1, 1999, and Febru y 1, 2000.
3. No bond proceeds may be disburse without a resolution of the City Council
adopted after January 1,1999, that eclares the Council's intent to:
a.
Complete construction of t e community center.
Page 1
zA-
.
.
.
b.
Special Council Minutes - 11118/98
Appropriate funds in fiscal year 2000 to pay interest due on August 1,
2000, and Fcbruary 1, 200 .
c. Issue long-term bonds to r fund the Temporary Bonds bcfore February 1,
2001.
4. The Trustee shall not release any ond proceeds if the City Council takes action
to:
a. Terminate contracts for the construction of the community center.
b. Terminate the lease agree ent with the Monticello Housing and
Redevelopment Authority.
c. Terminate the developmen agreement with the State Armory Building
Commission.
Mr. Fifield also explained that to accept the prop sal by R.J. Steichen & Company, the following
actions are needed:
... The HRA and the City Council ap rove the finance plan and direct Ehlers &
Associates and Kennedy & Grave to prepare revised legal documents to reflect
the appropriate terms and conditio s.
...
The HRA schedules a special meet ng on Monday, November 23, to take formal
action on the bonds and execute re ated legal documents.
... The City Council places action on he bonds, the lease, and related legal
documents on the agenda for Nove ber 23.
AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE B BRUCE THIELEN AND SECONDED BY BILL
FAIR TO APPROVE THE FINANCING PLAN AS P ESENTED AND AUTHORIZE EHLERS &
ASSOCIA TES TO PREP ARE THE REQUI RED DO UMENTS FOR APPROVAL BY COUNCIL AT
THE NOVEMBER 23, 1998, MEETING.
BILL FAIR THEN AMENDED THE MOTION TO ALSO INCLUDE EXECUTION OF THE
CONTRACT WITH THE CONTRACTOR AND AU HORlZE CONSTRUCTION TO BEGIN ON THE
COMMUNITY CENTER. THE AMENDMENT WA SECONDED BY BRUCE THIELEN. Voting in
favor: Bill Fair, Bruce Thielen, Roger Carlson. pposed: Clint Herbst, Brian Stumpf. Motion
carried.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY ROGER CARLSON A D SECONDED BY BRUCE THIELEN TO
ADJOURN THE MEETING. Motion carried unani ously.
Karen Doty
Deputy City Clerk
Page 2
zl4
.
.
.
MINU ES
REGULAR MEETING - MON ICELLO CITY COUNCIL
Monday, Novcmbc 23,1998 - 7 p.m.
Members Present: Bill Fair, Brian Stumpf, Bruc Thielen, Roger Carlson, Clint Herbst
Members Absent: None
2. A roval of minutes of the re ular meetin held November 9 1998.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY ROGER CAR SON AND SECONDED BY CLINT HERBST TO
APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE REGUL R COUNCIL MEETING HELD
NOVEMBER 9, 1998, AS WRITTEN. Moti n carried unanimously.
3. Consideration of addin r items to the arenda.
A. Bret Weiss asked for consideration of setting a date to continue the public hearing
for the Highway 25 project. See It m #13.
4.
A.
Councilmember Bruce Thielen not d that emotions ran high at the previous
meeting and he apologized for corn ents that may have offended the Council
members or citizens of the commu ity.
B. Jeff Michaelis offered comments a ainst approval of the community center
project regarding parking and fire h 11 proximity to proposed building and the
financing plan being considered by he City.
C. Jeff Bums commented in favor oft e community center, that a community center
is the right thing to do, this is the ri ht time to do it, parking is sufficient, and the
location is in accordance with the Cty's Redevelopment Plan.
D. Scott Douglas commented against t e community center noting an article in the
St. Cloud Times regarding deregula ion of utilities and the possible future effect
on funding the debt service on the c mmunity center.
E. Dave Kinnard commented on Mont cello's spiritual heritage and sense of
togetherness. He asked for all to w rk together on the community center project.
F. Peter Thielen and Andy Berg (stud ts) stated that the community center would
be a good resource for kids and eve yone else.
G.
John Sandberg spoke against the co munity center project. He stated he supports
having a good city hall but went on 0 state that the dollar amounts are not
Page 1
z,8
.
Council Minutes - 11/23/98
accurate on the sheet prepared to sh w what has been expended to date. He also
questioned the financing plan using short-term financing without knowing what
future holds.
H. Doug Franks stated his displeasure ith building a community center without a
referendum.
5. Consent agenda.
Public Works Director John Simola reques ed that item 5B be removed from the consent
agenda.
A. Consideration of a Ii uor I cense transfer - Comfort Inn Motel.
Recommendation: Approve the 0 -sale liquor license transfer at the Comfort Inn
Motel from Sandip Bhakta to Arlo ohnson.
B.
.
.
c.
Consideration of reviewin state bi s for ewer cleanin e ui ment and award of
contract for purchase. Recommen ation: Award the contract for purchase of a
new sewer cleaning machine to the low bidder, ABM Equipment, for the new
Vac-Con unit on the 1999 Internati nal Chassis for a fuII purchase price,
including trade and sales tax, of $1 1,447.25. The City does reserve the right to
sell either our old jet or vac-all to other buyer for a higher value than that
offered by ABM.
D. Consideration ofacce tance ofRi er Mill 2nd Addition Cit Pro.ect 97-11P.
Recommendation: Accept the pro ect as constructed and initiate the warranty
period subject to the developer pa ing all appropriate fees and providing the
maintenance bond.
E.
F. Consideration of a
Recommendation:
G.
Consideration of authorizin the r moval of abandoned BNSF railroad s ur and
Nelson Oil bulk tanks and structur s. Recommendation: Authorize staff to
contract for the removal and demo ition ofthe abandoned Nelson Oil bulk oil
facility in an amount not to excee $12,000.
z.B
.
.
.
Council Minutes - 11/23/98
A MOTION WAS MADE BY CLiNT HERBS AND SECONDED BY BRUCE THIELEN TO
ADOPT ITEMS 5A, 5C, 5D, 5E, 5F, AND 5G F THE CONSENT AGENDA AS
RECOMMENDED. Motion carried unanim usly.
6.
Consideration of items removed from the c nsent a enda for discussion.
5B. Consideration of chane order no. 1
wastewater treatment faci lity.
Public Works Director John Simola noted that Clyde Terwey of Adolfsen-
Petersen requested that the retainag be reduced from 4% to 2%. Councilmember
Clint Herbst asked how close the pr ~ect was to complction. John Simola
answered that testing has to be com leted yet. Mayor Bill Fair thought the City
should wait for the request to be se t in writing before it is presented to thc
Council for consideration.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY BRIAN STUMPF AND SECONDED BY BRUCE
THIELEN TO APPROVE CHANGE RDER #17 FOR EXPANSION OF THE
WASTEWATER TREATMENT FAC LiTY. Motion carried unanimously.
Public Hearin - Consideration of va cat in a ortion of the 5 If: Street roadwa easement
and consideration of va cat in Locust Strce betwecn Budin ton Northern ro ert and 6th
Street.
7.
Deputy City Administrator Jeff O'Neill ga e a presentation explaining the request from
Burlington Northern and the City. He sho ed the area affected and noted that the
vacation would provide a continuous land rea for the community center site.
Mayor Fair opened the public hearing.
Jeff Michaelis, operator of a business on 5 % Street, questioned whether the strcet would
be closed if the community center pro~ect ( tem #8) is not approved. He requested
consideration of making this item continge t on approval of item #8.
Mayor Fair closed the public hearing.
Councilmember Clint Herbst commented t at he felt the Michaelis request for
contingency is reasonable. Jeff O'Neill co mented that it could be added to the
recommended motion.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY BRUCE THIE EN AND SECONDED BY CLiNT HERBST TO
V ACA TE 5 Y2 STREET BETWEEN W ALNU AND LOCUST STREET AND TO V ACA TE
LOCUST STREET BETWEEN 6TH STREET ND THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN
PROPERTY, CONTINGENT ON APPROV A OF ITEM #8 IN THE COUNCIL AGENDA OF
11/23/98. Motion carried unanimously.
Page 3
2.8
.
.
.
Council Minutes - 11/23/98
8.
Deputy City Administrator Jeff O'Neill de rred to Rusty Fifield, Ehlers & Associates,
for presentation. Mr. Fifield updated the C ty Council on the resolution for temporary
bonds and changes to the financing plan. I e noted that the Housing and Redevelopment
Authority had passed the same resolution a their earlier meeting. Mayor Fair asked if the
bonds could be refinanced for permanent fi ancing at any time. Fifield replied that the
law allows for "advanced refunding" which permits bonds to be refinanced prior to their
coming due, which would allow the City to take advantage of favorable interest rates in
the future.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY BRIAN STUM F AND SECONDED BY CLINT HERBST TO
DENY ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION AU HORIZING THE EXECUTION AND
DELIVERY OF A GROUND LEASE AND A EASE-PURCHASE AGREEMENT, AND
DENY APPROVAL AND AUTHORIZATIO TO ISSUE PUBLIC PROJECT REVENUE
BONDS AND EXECUTE RELATED DOCU ENTS. Voting in favor: Clint Herbst, Brian
Stumpf. Voting against: Bill Fair, Roger C rlson, Bruce Thielen. Motion failed.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY BRUCE THIEL -N AND SECOND BY ROGER CARLSON TO
ADOPT A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING T E EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF A
GROUND LEASE AND A LEASE-PURCHA E AGREEMENT, AND APPROVE AND
AUTHORIZE THE ISSUANCE OF PUBLIC ROJECT REVENUE BONDS AND
EXECUTION OF RELATED DOCUMENTS. Voting in favor: Bill Fair, Roger Carlson,
Bruce Thielen. Voting against: Clint Herbs, Brian Stumpf. Motion carried.
SEE RESOLUTION 98-53.
9.
uent accounts receiva Ie
City Administrator Rick Wolfsteller cxplai ed that the delinquent accounts relate to past
due utility billing and miscellaneous bills w ich are now eligible to be certified as
assessments on 1999 taxes. He asked Chie Building Official Fred Patch to comment on
what constituted a charge for a storm permi , as there were a number of them included on
the list. Patch explained that the City Coun il (after the July I, 1997, storm) had set a
policy allowing permits at no charge for no -structural, cosmetic repairs on residential
properties. Councilmember Clint Herbst as ed if fees were only waived for residential.
Patch eXplained that was true. Businesses r quired inspections that would have resulted
in a cost to the City and, therefore, were not waived.
Mayor Fair opened the public hearing.
Page
&8
.
.
.
11.
Council Minutes - 11/23/98
Ray Schmidt of Ray-Wes Partnership explained that storm damages to his building were
only cosmetic (replaced siding and overhe d door), that he had been told there would be
no charge for the permit, and that he didn' recall secing any inspectors on the property.
He asked for the fees to be waived.
Mayor Fair closed the public hearing.
Councilmember Clint Herbst asked what e fect it would have if this one account was
waivcd. Patch replied that 8-10 other pen its could be affected. Councilmembers
debated whcther it would set a precedent t waive the fees in this case.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY CLINT HERB T AND SECONDED BY BRIAN STUMPF TO
ADOPT THE ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR T E DELINQUENT CHARGES BUT WAIVE THE
FEES FOR RA Y-WES PARTNERSHIP.
Bill Fair stated that he felt the case could b justified if the permit was approved prior to
Council clarification on storm permits; oth rwise he felt that a precedent would be set.
V oting in favor of the motion: Bruce Thiel n, Clint Herbst, Brian Stumpf, Rogcr Carlson.
Voting against: Bill Fair. Motion carried. SEE RESOLUTION 98-54.
10.
Consideration of a rovin an increase in ewer and water usa e rates for 1999.
Public Works Director John Simola explai ed that the request for an increase in water
and scwer usage rates was made prior to re eiving new information from the City
Administrator which showed additional re enue sources that he was not aware of. He
recommended that water and sewer rates n t be increased at this time.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY BRIAN STUM F AND SECONDED BY BRUCE THIELEN TO
HAVE NO FURTHER INCREASE IN EITHE THE WATER OR SEWER USAGE RATES
AT THIS TIME. Motion carried unanimous y.
Considerati n of advertisin for additional ull-time
Public Works Director John Simola noted t at Council action in February 1998 approved
a plan for onc additional parks worker than tilized currently. He also explained
suggested changes in the organizational ch for Public Works, including moving a
person to shop maintenance and adding a p ks maintenance worker. Councilmember
Clint Herbst asked if it was necessary to ob ain a new worker prior to spring. Park
Superintendent Greg Engle eXplained that t e reason for hiring a new person at this time
is to be able to maintain bettcr rinks and get them used to the system prior to spring.
Councilmember Bruce Thielen stressed the eed for better maintenance of rinks and
sidewalks. Councilmember Clint Herbst as ed if the pathway is being cleared. Greg
Engle responded with an explanation of the Ian to maintain rinks, pathways, and
sidewalks in conjunction with the necessary street clearing after snow storms.
Page
z-8
.
.
.
Council Minutes - 11/23/98
A MOTION WAS MADE BY BRUCE THIE EN AND SECONDED BY BRIAN STUMPF TO
AUTHORIZE ADVERTISEMENT FOR AN DDITIONAL PARKS WORKER WITH THE
INTENTION OF HIRING IN LATE DECEM ER OR EARLY JANUARY. Motion carried
unanimously.
12.
Consideration of bills for the last half ofN vember 1998.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY BRUCE THIE EN AND SECONDED BY ROGER CARLSON
TO APPROVE THE BILLS FOR THE LAST ALF OF NOVEMBER AS PRESENTED.
Motion carried unanimously.
13. Other matters.
A. C nsideration of continuin
City Engineer Bret Weiss explaine that a date should to be set to continue the
public hearing on the Highway 25 roject and recommended that could be done at
the December 14 meeting. Mayor air asked if preliminary assessment rolls
would be ready. Bret Weiss indicat d that would be done.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY BRIAN STUMPF AND SECONDED BY BRUCE
THIELEN TO CONTINUE THE PUB Ie HEARING ON THE HIGHWAY 25
PROJECT ON DECEMBER 14, 1998. Motion carried unanimously.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY BRUCE THIELEN AN SECONDED BY BRIAN STUMPF TO
ADJOURN THE MEETING. Motion carried unani ously.
Catherine M. Shuman
Finance Assistant/MIS
Page
z6
.
.
.
SA.
Council Agcnda - 12/14/98
Consideration of fund transfers for 1998. (R.W.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGRO
With this likely being the last meeting oft e year for the City Council, this housekeeping
item should be approved by the Council co ceming fund transfers to cover deficiencies in
various construction funds, transfers of bal nces remaining from various construction
funds to debt service funds that financed th projects, and other miscellaneous transfers to
correspond with our budget. One of the tr sfers proposed covers a 1998 budget item
where we indicated we would be using liq or fund revenues to pay one of our bond debt
requirements totaling $134,000 in an effort to keep our general tax levy higher and lower
our debt payment levy in case the Departm nt of Revenue would continue with levy
limitations. In reality, we levied the same ount that was originally needed to fund our
budget for 1998 by keeping expenditures i the general fund that would have normally
been paid for by liquor store revenue as pa of the tax levy.
Please review the proposed summary that i included with the agenda that outlines each
proposed transfer, dollar amount, and purp se of transfer.
B. AL TERNA TIVE ACTIONS:
1.
Approve the transfers as recommen ed.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is the recommendation of the Administra or that for accounting purposes, the above
transfers be approved prior to the end of 19 8. Without some of the transfers,
construction funds will continue to show d fieit cash balances while other construction
projects that may be finished will be kept 0 en unnecessarily. In addition, transferring
funds from the capital outlay fund to balan e out these construction funds that have
deficits will also more accurately reflect th amount of reserve balances that are still
available within the capital outlay fund.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
List of proposed transfers.
1998
RECOMMENDED FU D TRANSFERS
.
Debt Service Fund
Various TIF Debt
HRA Service Funds $198,685. 0
Liquor Debt Service Fund $134,000. 0
1986 G.O. Interceptor 1996C Sewer Interceptor
Sewer Bond Refunding Bond $111,037. 6
1988 Water Reservoir
Construction Fund 1998B G.O. Bond
95-02C Construction Fund
(Klein Farms) 1995A G.O. Bond
95-03C Construction Fund
(Ocello/School Blvd.) 1995A G.O. Bond
95-03C Construction
(Ocello/School Blvd) Capital Outlay Fund $261,769. 2
95-06C Construction Fund
(Cardinal Hills V) 1995A G.O. Bond $123,867.
96-01C Construction Fund
(Dundas Rdl 96-02C Construction Fund
Commerce Center 3rd) (Briar Oakes 2nd)
95-01 C Construction Fund
. (SW Area) 1995A G.O. Bond
96-05C Construction Fund
(Klein Farms 2nd) Capital Outlay Fund $31,259. 7
97-10C Construction Fund
(animal shelter) Capital Outlay Fund $1,422.2
96-06C Construction Fund
Sewer Access Fund (River St. Sewer) $570.04
93-08C Construction Fund
Capital Outlay Fund (Pathway Proj.) $4,583.5
94-01 C Construction Fund
Capital Outlay Fund (Cardinal Hills 4th) $3,370.0
96-02C Construction Fund
Capital Outlay Fund (Briar Oakes 2nd)
97-09C Construction Fund
Capital Outlay Fund (5th & Vine utilities) $2268
.
KAREN\EXCEL\RICK\FUNDTRF.xLS: 12/8/98
To transfer Kmart TIF revenue to bond fund.
To transfer TIF revenue from HRA to
debt service funds for bond payments.
To transfer funds for debt payments
on 1994A GO. bond (per budget).
To transfer balance of 1986 interceptor sewer funds
to refunding bond fund.
To close out old construction fund.
Balance to bond fund that financed it.
To close out construction fund.
Balance & TIF to debt service.
To close out construction fund. Balance to debt service.
To transfer state highway aid funds from construction fund to
capital outlay for future construction project use (not needed
in debt service at this time).
To close out balance to debt service.
To close out balance from one construction fund to another
similar construction fund that has a deficit.
Both were financed by same G.O. bond.
To close out balance to debt service.
To close out balance to capital outlay fund
(not financed by a G.O. bond)
To close out balance to capital outlay fund
that financed project.
To eliminate deficit in construction fund.
To eliminate deficit and close out fund.
To eliminate deficit and close out fund.
To eliminate deficit and close out fund.
To eliminate deficit in fund.
S~
-
I
.
.
.
5B.
Council Agenda - 12/14/98
Consideration of rati in union eontrac renewal. (R.W.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGRO
The LU.O.E. Local 49 Union contract that overs nine employees in our public works
department expired April 1, 1998. Council ember Clint Herbst and myself have met
various times with union representatives 0 er the past six or seven months in an attempt
to iron out a new contract extension. I beli ve we have arrived at an agreement that is
acceptable to the City and has also been ap roved by the union membership.
In April 1998, Councilmember Herbst was ppointed as the Council representative along
with myself to negotiate a contract extensi n. The initial proposal by the City had
requested the following amendments to the contract:
.. Added a requirement for on-call status that would have paid an additional
$5 per day ($35 per week) hen we assigned someone to on-call status.
.. Reduce overtime pay from d uble time to time-and-a-half on Sundays.
..
Added the ability of the Cit to create a full-time, year-round lead person
(foreman) if we desired.
..
Lowered the vacation sched Ie for new employees hired after April from
18 days per year to 15 days er year after 13, 14, and 15 years of service.
.. Lowered sick leave accumul tion from one day a month to 6.5 hours per
month, with the other 1.5 ho rs being set aside for catastrophic illness
purposes only.
.. Offered a salary adjustment f 2% increase in the wage scale.
.. Offered to create a new job lassification called Shop Mechanic that could
be compensated one grade h. gher on our pay scale or approximately 6%.
.. Offered to change job descri tion of the Groundskeeper position that
would increase the grade of t is position by one level.
Since the union membership had not reques ed a meeting until July, we had not received
any demands from the union until our first eeting. The following is a summary of the
union's first contract proposal.
..
Change working hours to 7 a m. to 3:30 p.m. from the current 7:30 to 4:30
shift.
2
Council Agenda - 12/14/98
.
..
Requested overtime for any (me worked over 8 hours in a day rather than
just 40 hours in a week.
.. Requested two hours of ove ime pay for each callback rather than a
minimum of two hours' strai
.. Wanted a 10% premium for y hours worked after 11 p.m. until 5 a.m.
.. Wanted two additional holid ys per year.
.. Requested 5 weeks vacation fter 20 years of service from the present 4
weeks.
.. Wanted cash payment for 6 ick days per year after an employee
accumulated lOO days.
.. Requested 100% of unused ick leave be available for payment of
insurance after retirement ra her than 50% of the first 100 days that is now
allowed.
..
Requested a 4.9% increase i salary the first year and 4.5% the second.
.
..
Requested longevity pay of etween $95 and $180 per month depending
on length of service.
Councilmember Herbst and I met a couple ftimes with union representatives and both
sides dropped a number of our demands. T ere was quite a bit of discussion concerning
the establishment of an on-call status that t e City felt was important for the sewer and
water department personnel. While we hav been very fortunate in not having any
serious emergencies in recent years, I do th nk we recognize that as we continue to grow,
there may come a time when we may have n emergency on a weekend that isn't covered
if we don't start establishing an employee t be on call during the weekends.
.
During further negotiating sessions, the uni n had modified their request and added a few
additional items, including language allowi g for reimbursement of educational expenses
if approved by the City Administrator. Th union had also tried to limit what vehicles
and equipment part-time and seasonal wor ers could use, but the City was not interested
in putting these types of restrictions on wh t a part-time or seasonal worker could do. We
did agree that we would not allow any part time or seasonal worker to drive a vehicle that
they were not properly licensed to drive. s far as the educational reimbursement
request, this is already allowed in our gene al personnel policy if the educational
schooling is deemed advantageous to the C ty. The union was also basically in
agreement with our request to create a Sho Mechanic position and to revise the
Groundskeeper/Maintenance position, but t ey continued to resist the on-call status pay
for the sewer and water department unless lore money was offered. Recognizing that it
3
.
Council Agenda - 12/14/98
was more important for the City to have 0 -call status coverage during the weekends and
holidays, wc offered to limit on-call to we kends and offered $25 per day. Union
members countered with a request for 2 h urs' payor approximately $32 per day, and we
split the difference and agreed to pay 1.75 hours' pay per day for weekend on-call status.
The result of our drawn out negotiations i that we now have a contract proposal that the
union has accepted and I think is fair for t e City and should be ratified by the Council.
To summarize, the new agreement:
... creates a job classification f Shop Mechanic that is approximately one
grade (6%) higher than the egular Operator Mechanic position.
... clarifies that part-time and easonal employees may operate vehicles if
properly licensed to do so.
... creates an on-call status for the sewer and water department employees
allowing the City to assign n individual to be on call weekends, 24 hours
per day, at a cost of$28.28 er day.
...
reduces vacation schedule fi r new employees from 144 hours after years
13, 14, and 15, to 120 hours (same as non-union).
.
...
allows sick leave to be used for illness of employee's spouse or children.
... provides for a 3% increase i salary effective April 1, 1998 (same as non-
union received), and grants 1.5% minimum increase or whatever is
received by non-union for t e years April 1, 1999, and April 1, 2000.
... extends the contract for thre years instead of the two until April 1, 2001.
... allows for reimbursement 0 educational expenses (if approved by City
Administrator). This is CUff ntly allowed in our personnel policy for non-
umon.
Basically, the City was able to get on-call s atus included as part of the contract, and we
feel that the 1.75 hours' pay per day for eac weekend day that an individual is on call 24
hours per day is a reasonable cost to ensure that any emergency can be covered in the 10-
15 minute response time. The wage increa e of 3% is identical to what was received by
non-union employees, and the contract will allow the City the flexibility of creating a
lead person if we desire for each departmen and to create a Shop Mechanic position. As
new employees are hired in the future, we'l see a reduction in the vacation schedule for
these new employees. Overall, I think the ontract is reasonable and should be ratified by
the Council.
.
4
Council Agenda - 12/14/98
.
B.
AL TERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Approve the negotiated 3-year contr ct for the union membership as outlined
above.
2. Do not ratify the contract but contin c negotiations on specific issues.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is my recommendation that the final agre ment we've negotiated is reasonable for the
City and will provide assurance in the futur that sewer and water department
emergencies can be handled in a timely ma ner. I believe Councilmember Herbst is also
in agreement with the basic contract as pro osed. It is, therefore, recommended that
alternative #1 be approved.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of contract amendments.
.
.
5
International Union of Operating Engineers
.
LOCAL UNION NO. 49, 49A 49B, 49C, 490 and 49E
MINNESOTA · NORTH DAKOTA · SOUTH DAKOTA (East half)
JON R. PENDZIMAS, President
DUANE L OTNESS. Vice PreSident
JOHN M. SCHOUVELLER,
Recording-Corresponding Secretary
JOHN H. PETERSON, Treasurer
November 25, 1998
FRED P. DERESCHUK, Business Manager-Financial Secretary
2829 ANTHONY LANE SOUTH - MtNN APOLlS, MINNESOTA 55418-3285
Phone: (612) 88-9441
FAX: (612) ? 8-1936
Mr. Rick Vvolfsteller
City Administrator
City of Monticello
250 East Broadway
Monticello, MN 55362-9245
RE: 1998-1999 Labor Agreement Proposals
Dear Mr. Wolfsteller:
.
Affiliated with A.F.L.-C.I.O.
'~.:'
On November 23, 1998, the members employ d by the City of Monticello, represented
by I.U.O.E. Local No. 49, voted to accept the C'ty's proposal dated October 22, 1998
(copy attached) with the changes as outline in your letter of November 6, 1998,
regarding Section 10.08 (copy also attache .
If you have any questions, please feel free to c II me.
Sincerely,
INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING
, ENG~NEER. S,~CAL NO. 49
;:::--rl C~ ~-.:
Tim R. Connors
Area Business Representative
TRC/dka
opeiu #12, afl-cio
cc: Steward
Attachment
.
2002 London Road
Duluth, MN 55812
(218) 724-3840
BRANCH OF ICES
Rt. 9. Box 3 2
Mankato. MN 5 001
(507) 625-36 0
111 - 3rd SI. S.w.
Rochester, MN 55902
(507) 282-0401
Box 279
Bagley. MN 56621
(218) 694.6206
1903 N. 41h St.
SI. Cloud, MN 56303
(320) 252.2162
2901 Twin City Dr.
Mandan, ND 58554
(701) 663-0407
3002 1 sl Ave. No.
Fargo, ND 58102
(701) 232.2769
S&... I
307 - 1 sl SI. North
Virginia, MN 55792
(218) 741-8190
724 Washington N.
Grand Forks, ND 58203
(701) 775.3969
~-_._-.~.-
e
~
ij
':!
~
ie
I
;
j
~
~
~
~
-
W
~".
~
r
!. ~.
~. ,j
".; ........
.': ,
~
--..
MONTlCELW
Office of the City AJminisrrtltof
250 East Broadway
Monticello. MN 55364-9245
Phone: (612) 295-2711
Metro: (612) 333-5739
November 6. 1998
Mr. Tim Connors
LU.a.E. Local 49
2829 Anthony Lane South
Minneapolis, MN 55418-3285
Re:
1998-1999 labor agreement proposal
Dear Tim:
I received your letter of November 4 regarding the me bership's acceptance of our proposed contract extension.
Your proposal to delete Article 10.08 is a concern to th City, as we feel this new section adding on-call status
compensation is an important public safety concern for the City.
Although my proposal is subject to the negotiating rep esentative approval and ultimately ratification by the City
COllncil. I would like to propose that Section 10.08 ren ain in the contract proposal with the compensation adjusted
to read 3.5 hours of pay for a two-day weekend and 5. 5 hours for a three-day weekend. This would basically
amount to a compromise between my proposal and yo r counter-proposal and provides for a daily compensation of
approximately $28.28 per hour for each day of a week nd on-call statuS.
Provided this is acceptable to the membership and oth r provisions of the contract remain as originally proposed in
my last correspondence, the City will agree to make al salary schedule adjustments retroactive to April I, 1998. If
this proposal is not acceptable, we will have to schedu e further meetings to discuss these issues, and the likelihood
of retroactive salary adjustments may not be available
Yours truly,
/
Ric Wolfsteller
City Administrator
R W Ikd
cc: 1998 Union File
Clint Herbst, Council Negotiating Represent tive
PER TRC cc sent to Steward on 11/101 8
66-2.-
:{
J
..
.. ' ,
i
.
*
~ /
~<j\101?y1
MONTICELLO
Office of che City AdministnlWT
250 East Broadway
Monticello, MN 55362-9245
Phone: (612) 295-2711
Metro: (612) 333-5739
October 22, 1998
Mr. Tim Connors
LV.a.E. Local 49
2829 Anthony Lane South
Minneapolis, MN 55418
Re: 1998-1999 Labor Agreement Proposals
Dear Mr. Connors:
.
On behalf of the City of Monticello, I am hereby sub itting the following proposed revisions to the labor
agreement with Local 49 and the City for the years 19 8 and 1999. To make it easier for you to review,
changes or clarifications to YOllr proposal dated Oct ber 16, 1998, are in bold and italics print.
1. Article II R Recognition
2.01 (revision) - Add the following job classification: Shop Mechanic/Operator
2. Article V - Employer Authority
5.03 (add) _ Part-time or seasonal emp oyees may only operate motor vehicles if they are
properly licensed by the State.
3. Article VII M Definitions (add)
7.13 _ on Call w When an employee is assigned by employer to carry a pager and be on
call and available to respond to an em rgency at a time other than an assigned shift within
a 7-day work week.
4.
Article X M Overtime Pay
.
10.06 (add additional paragraphs) - When a department supervisor has three or more
employees assigned to work under hi er direction, the employer shall have the option of
assigning an employee to the status 0 Operator/Mechanic Lead Person on an annual basis,
and that employee shall be compensa ed an additional $1.00 per hour above base rate
compensation. _ S e ,. -,
.
.
.
Mr. Tim Connors
October 22, 1998
Page 2
In the absence of the department supervisor, a lead person may be assigned to an on-call
status and shall be required to carry a p ger whi Ie on and off duty during the supervisor's
absence.
The employer shall have the sole autho ity in selection of a lead person to be based on
performance evaluations and capabilities of the employee.
10.08 (add section relating to on-call st tus) - A water/sewer collection employee assigned
to a weekend schedule for on-call status shall be required to carry a pager while on and off
duty and be compensated an additional Itree (3) hoursfor a two-day weekend amlfotlr
and one-half (4 1/2) hOllrs for a three- ay weekend above base compensation for the
weekend period. An on-call status emp oyee shall be available to respond to emergency
calls within a IS-minute response time nd will carry the only pager available for that
department. In addition to the daily co pensation, the employee will be compensated for
any additional callback time at regular ase rates of pay for the number of hours worked.
At the discretion of the employer, a dep ment supervisor may be assigned to a rotation
as an on-call status and shall be availab e to respond to all emergency calls for service
during that rotation. All weekend assig ments for on-call status shall be determined and
scheduled at the discretion of the em pi yer. For the purpose of this section, a weekend
period begins at the end of the normal s ift of the individual assigned on Friday and ends
at the beginning of a nonnal shift on M nday. In the case of a tlrree-day weekend, the
period begins at the end of the normal Itift prior to tlte beginning of a t!tree-day
weekend and ends at the beginning of he next regular day shift after the three-day
weekend. .
This section regarding additional comp nsation for on-call statl.lS does not apply to an
individual assigned to on-call status un er 10.06.
5. Article XX - Vacation Leave
20.01 (addition) . All pennanent equip ent mechanic/operator employees and
groundskeeper maintenance worker em loyees scheduled to work 40 hours per week ~
after 4/1198 covered by this agreement s all earn vacation benefits as follows:
After 1 year of service:
2-5 years of service:
6-15 years of service:
16 years or more:
40 hours straight time
80 hours
12 hours
16 hours
6.
Article XXI - Sick Leave
21.03 (revise) - Sick leave may be grant d only for absence from duty because of personal
illness or legal quarantine of the emplo ee, his/her spOLlse, or children.
~6-""
Mr. Tim Connors
October 22, 1998
Page 3
.
7. Appendix I . Salary Schedule
Revise the Equipment Mechanic/Operat r top rates to $16.16 per hour effective 4/1/98.
Along with these adjustments, Appendix I would be adjusted for new employees and those
who have not yet reached the top rate ba ed on months of service according to the
following salary wage schedule: The ef ctive rate increase is 3%.
Operator/Mechanic
Top Rate
42-54 mos.
30-42 mos.
18-30 mos.
06-18 mos.
First 6 mos.
04/01/98
$16.16
$15.51
$14.86
$14.21
$13.58
$12.93
.
The wage schedule for the Groundskeep r/Maintenance worker position would be
adjusted to a top rate of $8. 75 per hour e fective 4/1/98. Pay ranges would also be
modified as listed below for any new employees hired after this date within the
classification or for those employees wh have not yet reached the top rate according to
the following schedule:
Groundskeeper 04/1 /97 04/01/98 04/01/98
Top Rate $8.50 $8.75 $9.27
42;54 mos. $8.15 $8.39 $8.89
30-42 mos. $7.80 $8.03 $8.51
18-30 mos. $7.46 $7.68 $8.14
06-18 mos. $7.12 $7.33 $7.77
First 6 mos. $6.79 $6.99 $7.41
The wage schedule as outlined in the th rd colllmn above proposes an additional
adjustment to the ranges of 6% to recog ize the changes in the jub description of the
Groundskeeper position for occasional 0 eration of heavy equipment and the requirement
for obtaining a Class B driver's license. This wage scale would be effective/or any
Groundskeeper/Maintenance Worker I on obtaining a Class B driver's license,
passage of a required drug and alcohol screening test, and inclusion oftlte worker ill
the operational drllg and alcohol rand m testing program.
.
Establish a salary schedule for the Shop echanic/Operator position with a top rate of
$17.14 effective at contract renewal. Pa ranges for this position would also be created
for any new employees hired after this d te within the classification or for those
employees who have not yet reached the top rate according to the' following schedule:
5&-'!)
.'
.
Mr. Tim Connors
October 22, 1998
Page 4
Shop Mechanic/Operator
Top Rate
42-54 mos.
30A2 mos.
18-30 mos.
06-18 mos.
First 6 mos.
04/01/98
$17.14
$16.45
$15.77
$15.08
$14.40
$13.71
The City of Monticello agrees to adjust he OperatorlMechanic, Shop Mechanic/Operator,
and Groundskeeper/Maintenance classi cation salary schedules on 4/1199 by an additional
1.5% or by a percentage rate that is equ I to the amount granted by the City of Monticello
to all non-union employee wage scales r the year 1999, whichever is greater, and on
4/112000 by an additional 1.5?(o or by a ereentage rate tltat is equal to tlte amount
granted by the City to all non.union e ployee wage scales for the year 2000, whichever
is greater.
8.
Article XIV - Duration
.
The City is proposing that the duration f the new contract run for tllree years from
April 1, 1998, through March 31,2001.
9.
Article XVIII - Group Insurance Program
18.01 (revision) - Appendix #3 as attac ed
10. New Article. Education Compensation (add
Employees will be reimbursed for one undred percent (100%) of the cost incurred for the
payment of tuition, fees, and text books required in the attendance of job-related courses
provided that:
The course has been approved b the City Manager and department director prior
to registration for, or participati n in, the course.
The employee has submitted a c rtified fee statement for payment of tuition, fees
and purchase of text books.
The employee must show proof of satisfactory completion of the course.
~
I
.
The attendance of the employee at course sessions has been satisfactory.
It appears from your proposal of October 16 that we a e not very far apart in agreeing to a new contract
extension. The proposed modifications and clarificati ns I've outlined in this letter are revisions that I
feel the union membership should seriously consider fi r ratification. I would like to see this contract run
for three years rather than the normal two with an expiration date of March 31, 2001, since we are already
_ ____ _ _~ __ s_tO_~ ~
Mr. Tim Connors
October 22, 1998
Page 5
.
six months past the expiration date of the previous cant act. The provision added that guarantees the
membership at least a 1.5% increase or an amount that s equal to what other non.union employees
receive should adequately protect the membership in re eiving a fair adjustment for the third year.
It should be noted that I have again revised the 4/1/98 age scale for Operator/Mechanic to reflect a 3%
increase, not 3.1 %, to coincide with the adjustments re eived by non.union personnel for 1998.
One other issue that this letter is intended to clarify is t e additional wage scale adjustment for the
Groundskeeper/Maintenance Worker position. The ad itional 6% increase for this classification is meant
to compensate the individuals in this classification for btaining a Class B commercial driver's license
and upon successfully passing the required drug and al ohol screening test. Upon an individual being
included in our required drug and alcohol testing progr m for commercial license drivers, any individual
employed by the City at that time would be eligible for inclusion in the second wage scale outlined
earlier.
.
The last area that is proposed for revisions is in regard t the amount of compensation for weekend on-
eall status for the water/sewer collection employees. It is my understanding that there may be a desire by
the union membership to have the additional compensa ion relate to an hourly wage rather than a set
dollar amount so that this particular item did not have t be renegotiated at every union contract
extension. As a result, 1 have modified our initial prop sal to indicate that an individual assigned to on-
eall status for a weekend would be receiving an additio all.S hours base pay for each day on call. This
will allow the rate of compensation to be adjusted alU1U lly in conjunction with any increases in the
salary schedules for these individuals. I believe the co pensation offered will be reasonably close to the
initial $2S per day proposal and will be an amount that ay be more acceptable for Council ratification.
As you may recall, there was even reluctance by the Cit negotiating representatives to even propose a
daily fee at the $25 level, and it appears extremely unli ely that the Council would approve any contract
that included more than this amount.
On behalf of the City, I am willing to meet with you an lor your representatives at your convenience to
discuss this proposal, which would cover a new agreem ot for the next 2 Yz years. If this issue is not
resolved in the near future, the City's proposals that ha e always included making any adjustments to the
salary schedules retroactive to April I may no longer b offered, and all adjustments finally approved
may be effective the date of ratification by the Council.
Yours truly,
cn~F M.ONTICELLO
~j~ ({),
Rick Wolfstelle
City Administ tor
.
R W/kd
cc:
1998 Union File
Clint Herbst, Council Negotiating Representativ
58-7
.
sc.
.
.
Consideration of a
Rollin Woods. A
A.
Council Agenda - 12/14/98
(J.O.)
G.P. Land Corporation has submitted an ap lication for approval ofthe Rolling Woods
subdivision plat and the subsequent rezoni g of the parcel from A-O (Agricultural-Open
Space) to R-l (Single Family Residential). The proposed development of single family
detached is a permitted use within the R-l istrict. The area comprises 39.19 acres and is
a blend of wooded land near the north and lopes downward to a wetland situated in the
southeast corner of the parcel. Planning C mmission reviewed this item at a public
hearing on December 1, 1998, and recom ended approval of the preliminary plat.
Planning Commission also reviewed a req est for a zoning ordinance amendment
rezoning the property from Agricultural to -1. The City Council is not asked to rule on
the rezoning until final platting. Followin is the Planner's report followed by available
alternatives.
Land Use
The proposed development is consistent w th the Comprehensive Plan, calling for low-
density housing. The subject parcel is at t e southern boundary of the Orderly
Annexation Area. The land to the east and west are also part ofthe city's Orderly
Annexation Area and would be appropriat to follow the subject parcel in the city's
growth. The land south of the subject parc 1 is outside the city's growth plans and would
not be considered for annexation any time oon. To the north is the rccently-platted and
annexed Wildwood Ridge subdivision. T e proposcd R-l zoning district dcsignation is
consistent with the City's long-range land se plan, surrounding developmcnt, and the
proposed land use plan being discussed by the Orderly Annexation Area Board.
Subdivision
The property includes a wooded area in th northern third, then open land which slopes
downward toward the southeast to a wetla d (Outlot A). The applicant has proposed 80
single family lots ranging from 12,000 sq are feet to 27,536 square feet. The minimum
requirement for the R-l district is 12,000 quare feet. Lot width minimum is eighty (80)
feet. All lots, except those in Fox Circle d Lots 9, 10 and 11, Block 1, indicate that
they meet the minimum requirement for I t width. The cul-de-sac lots appear to meet the
minimum width, and the applicant should erify the width of the cul-de-sac lots at the
front yard setback on the preliminary plat rawing.
Setbacks in the R-l district are thirty (30) eet front and rear yard, ten (10) side yard, and
twenty (20) feet on corner lots abutting a ublic right-of-way. The proposed setbacks
indicatcd in the plans appear to be in com liance with the R-l district.
6
Council Agenda - 12/14/98
.
According to the Monticello Subdivision rdinance, block length shall normally not
exceed thirteen hundred twenty (1,320) fee, except where topography or other conditions
justify a departure from the maximum. 'fh longest block length in Rolling Woods is one
thousand seventy-five (1075) feet. Theret! re, the subdivision satisfies this minimum
requirement. Block width shall normally b sufficient to allow two (2) tiers of lots of
appropriate depth. Rolling Woods compli s with the established standard.
Currently, entrance to the proposed develo ment would only be from the north (Troy
Marquette Drive) through Wildwood Ridg . Reserved access to the east and west would
become available when development conti ues in these directions. Temporary turn-
arounds would need to be constructed at th ends of the streets along the southern
property line because development beyond this point would not be encouraged, at least
during the period of the annexation agreem nt.
Outlot A, located in the southeast quarter 0 the parcel, is intended to be a storm water
retention pond to slow the drainage during ainfall. Most of the time, the pond will be
dry. The preferred design for a retention p nd is one that will not demand maintenance
by the City such as mowing. To achieve t .s, creative grading and planting that would
allow for the natural succession of plant m terials is encouraged. A combination of
native grass mixture and sufficient ponding area would help achieve the preferred design.
.
The northern half ofthe subject parcel is w oded. The City intends to preserve as much
ofthe trees in the area as possible. The ap licant has provided a plan working with City
planning staff that has been designed to m age the amount of tree loss in the plat by
locating streets and houses in areas of mor open space and focuses on preserving mature
oaks. Nonetheless, the grading plan will n cessitate the removal of a significant number
of trees. One possible option would be to nd "Deer Street" in a cul-de-sac near Lot 7,
Block 1. This would avoid some tree loss y creating rear yard spaces in an area of
wooded land, although it would create an a kward street design for "Bear A venue"
where it turns to the west.
The grading and drainage plan, which indicates proposed ponding and wetland
mitigation, shall be subject to review and a proval of the City Engineer, as well as the
City's wetland mitigation process.
The plat design indicates a 1.5-acre park at he center of the project. This location was
requested by the Parks Commission to serv as a neighborhood park for the residents of
this plat and other nearby development. C mbined with the ponding area of more than 6
acres in the southeast corner, the plat has a attractive amount of open space which is
well exposed to the street system. This arr ngement will significantly improve the visual
impact of the subdivision.
.
7
.
Council Agenda - 12/14/98
Pedestrian access is provided in the plat v'a a planned sidewalk which adjoins the north
side of "Lynx Street" from the southwest 'orner of the project to the street extension to
the east. Additional sidewalk will connee to the north along Troy Marquette Drive into
the Wildwood Ridge subdivision. A path ay easement has been preserved in the
northwest corner of the plat which will pr vide the opportunity to connect to the upland
parks and pathways of the Monte Club Hi 1. This pathway may extend through
Wildwood Ridge or eventually to the wes , depending on options available as Wildwood
Ridge is constructed.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
Decision 1: Preliminary Plat
1. Motion to recommend approval of he Rolling Woods Preliminary Plat as
submitted. This motion should be upported by a finding that the subdivision is
consistent with the direction of the Comprehensive Plan and complies with the
provisions of the Monticello Zonin and Subdivision Ordinances. The motion
includes a condition that the City ngineer's review and approval is required for
engineering, grading, and related is ues.
.
This is the alternative recommende by the Planning Commission.
2.
Motion to recommend approval of he Rolling Woods Preliminary Plat, subject to
alterations in the plat design which . ncrease tree preservation. This motion should
be supported by a finding that the ique asset of the Monte Club Hill justifies
additional measures for tree preser ation, and is conditioned on the approval of
the City Engineer for engineering, rading, and related issues.
The Planning Commission was sati tied that adequate measures have been taken
to protect trees.
3. Motion to recommend denial of the Rolling Woods Subdivision Plat and rezoning
from A-O district to R-l district. T is motion should be supported by a finding
that the property is not ripe for deve opment until the OAA adopts a Land Use
Plan and other property developme t increases access to the site.
4. Motion to table action on the Rollin Woods Subdivision Plat and rezoning,
subject to the submission of additio al information.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
.
Staff and Planning Commission recommen approval of the Rolling Woods Preliminary
Plat. The area is within the Orderly Annex tion Area and meets the intent of the OAA
Agreement regarding land use and contiguit . The plat design has been revised based
8
Council Agenda ~ 12/14/98
.
upon staff discussions with the developer nd his engineer to increase tree preservation in
the north portion of the project. The only dditional suggestion would be to investigate
the option of terminating Deer Street in a ul-de-sac to increase rear yard tree
preservation. This suggestion is subject t comment from the City Engineer regarding
the street pattern and an analysis of actual ree loss if the concept were implemented.
No action is required on the petition for a nexation. City action to approve annexation
will be considered only after an MOAA r ling on whether or not the annexation request
meets the requirements for annexation.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Exhibit A - Site Location
Exhibit B - Preliminary Plat
Exhibit C - Preliminary Utility Plan
Exhibit D - Grading and Drainage Plan
Exhibit E - Petition for annexation
Exhibit F - Draft minutes from Planning ommission meeting
.
.
9
'- -p Z -M
~ R1
~~
11:--4/..1./1 /~ .........
'f IfiiD tf.(U; ~ ........
~jm;~~ ..~
" ~~~"""
~f,%",. ~~ ~> >,
I/ii ......l7J1l. I: ~ ~ .N, '":''' ..
LJ, ,
_'_'J"~Y. ~""'- ..
." r. - 'r,; . N':.....c:t'l
~ ~~" .~ - \... r J r:.t t>.. ~ --
~ . <J........~--~
-L ': -=:, - ~
~. PS-
- T7 1
V~':"
Jjln.,;
l ..:.. '//
. . \. ~ I 1 - Q.
-.l"" 11,'l A
1~' z
ESTATES
~
.-\1 .. . .. .
~- -. : -:
~ :::::;:;
'-"f;1:[ . +
~
-".....
~~ ':v mi. l.n..... JI~.. ~J. . ,.
:),'. ~ " ,o..' . 'J.,,:,.II .... :::::..
- . ...... """.M." . .
." .. ..... "'f'"
},-/?,~" ; .~:I{~:j" ~~
-=,:~~ . -mr.. .. I~
R1
TS
'~
\:\ I
-
c
.
//""
· - I -[Sne:--
O~ t..-If'o"'l IT,S
2
""
'10
~
~~.~
~~'Jl~
Date: September 19se
'l',
//,
~~ .. T
. .
-r
~e-I
EXHIBIT A .. SITE LOCATION
~"'f1Il
-"'-
....-- .. ..-
,.",........'~--w
""""'-'Y1 -.-111
..... :;~~
-
-
~
1 Vld AllVNll'il13lJd
NOll VlJOdllO::> eNVl dQ f
'Nrt 'Ol13::>11NOrt SeOOM QNI110lJ ~ ~
~~;I,"'~~
';:~
":)MII.~.L ..v ,
NO'''''~f.'1 V1IOI
'.
,
I I .
~. jj !,I;:I :.! 1ft 1;..L- i i~l: _I !I'
wI I'll , ;j I lltl r'lr- If I'
~ nll.1I II d I 1'" f i iH! I j
f i I I I: : JI: ifH ~ ;
Ii ~/
! '~ ~(
)-..~:W1). .:iL ~~)'\ ;;;JL-WJiJ.;~//\
J- ...." ), ~ 'rl{ :Y....:s:.. ""'I~n~n1:nrn\ ,., j / :::s.:'~~~j "
, ~ '6""1"-'I:"--,J>':;~ '~r:;!!:\---"'n' I 1'.1, ~
~.1 'rvJlf!I::f~~/:;~~N~4DL1., l' ! \~.! ! 'l!/'
(-:lV1'j ,I ,:L-~,.:J f.'L J'&LJ 1:~l.r''1'" l '/ ~ .I -. \ I,
, L'l.~~\'~l~- 11- ..JIll I, 11 "
, , . - .-1" '_nn_l, un_ '~.___ ': J'::c.., ..'I l I: ~. '.I I,.
} iii L~S.~ ,.~. J "-'.- :, , : "I · ~",~:;--'-~~--::-';I
I - -,~\---~._ .... ~ l" i' ,....
:.~~~:L .. ~,\ lfff~~J, · J' /....- !.
'..T<~' ~(r- --- i , ~ ~1; ~----':'-~i fr-~.::\1 :-~.:~"~' ~"-.) ~ ~ '- / 'I
~ __I 1"1 1"1 -l. "~ll... 7iX \ ,__ t
:r ' :1 ' , I' , " ,: r '~:-:; --..- hi
II I: II 11 :1 . a Ii I II :1 ..~~ ~, . "\.. I ~
=::1'.~.:;~~~~R~bnJ;:~? ' ',,-', ~-:'" [;?-,;
I "5 " I' 'I II' 'I 1,1'
- "' · I, ~)\ '~" ~ ,'I ......:-. ' ' " 1:,1 ' , ...L..
,r'~:\,..., '- ~,\ .J.i~~.,J1r---JL_Ji I' ~ ~-',"~---;:;;---'~--~'r-~
~ '.....~~">:'"'" $:'':- - z..=-j ':,/-__ml ".m ",l ~m_J , !;- ':::-:::':N---":::~: :;.:::::~~ 'I' lor r--:ln~--iI~: l
{ I I "'t.. """'.., ".. "> ...- , !t. I: :1 I :1 I: ,.: ~ J I
-'::_+,~L,'-' '\o>",:",<~// ~/-!::!--r-L!:'''- '" ).,~ -1.......... .. l' ......-.....:i' '.' , ' .J
~' " l '_v 'o./I...-Y ~ /-, - ;.: I .. t:' j.Jilx:"i I -', rs;:1 I Ji "I' :::'l'-~~;J- :::,
~- r:., I," r, ~~_ -\--1 [~::'i!l I .. :--~l: ~i- :: ~~~ :'! I I , :
n~~.1 /If 04X~:-r:'<J-=--~V.i 'r~'J --fo''':'':' -; Ih ~:u-\' '-31~--" "n~...~__" ~: ! I
\-,-~:!~<,:e~.nr=- ,"= -: t-," i ~hh-'::!~-.A_.J J ,(' ';.' .,' ~~'\~-- ~ :-;l~F': -~l \.1 :;~-~- :~~:;'
" ',.l. '~' ;:;:., ":,;~~.; :T';,....d~'m-;.: 1 J ,F ! ,I f.:~'~>. ~J \1-, j d j I, \~' ir(: I":' /;
___"' t/_I:-~~u u 1 ! : I : I " I~!L' Iii' " I ~......~ ;..._..~.a '- ~_: : '- --1 j
~ . -n~S1-~- ..', I ~"" l I, ~ '---,-, ~ /. '-v "(,',,,- ~, , 'un'" -.- . ,
, 1', : l( ,(I l' -' ,~,.""" - _~_-'.J r-- "-'--. ':!/I / ,v"'~'\--::-<..'-- -- I "-"""""J'-1--" ':
.........,::.. .. t... I ~~-= ~.. :-""'1-~........SJ----"'I I: " 'I,' I l~ ~ "I 7"
~~:~! I I r-F~-- I"'i---... ~!. 'II 1/), _..1-1 .... = ~~. : I J I
,",,"'n_: "---"'~-"",~, n' f' 'I ~'I' I j ,-. :. \ 'I :0'-' , ~~:'.::':-I . ~' -'
-~ ~ ;= ;....=)*1 I ~i l... l -' : ~ .-... I \ ~,,"'oJ"';'-~:~l-X\\ ~,'<3--- 'R.=-r b ~'~~~':-:fd~:-' I
," i "IItl " N.. ~_~U~,..~~__ -- - ~~.., i \ r}\ ...." (-,:;r-~ 1: I
, : I: f r --~ =~-y- I I~" -\ \ z\ \ 1"*...... ..').~..\ }f/-"-...'-~ll'" 11:1,-+ ~ I I I
- ! fU....~X;: ...,'1' ' ":'1 / 11)1~ \ '\^'\' \~.._-.. /~~-{frl :1 1,:1 I: f ,:-:---':n;
I r I I I 1& :---JC.! ....nu =tt..~_ ..i \\\\. .... (...... ; \ ~ .~' I I j I 1 I I j~~"
. 11~1'-'1:' I ':m:'~:--:;': :l\:~'~"~~"'~ <:" '<~;J" ,'-',~:~_L:::"'-L1: ~ 1 ,'-:~ /
,_-'-__.~_n4-' ~ ~7""', ""-)~:-"\\' \\ //7"'" ~ ,t-...~ ,;-0." 'f ,1.1,/
~ it:~L ,......... I ~.~l". r: 'I ':\~ ~1\\ '\. :;;\ "J:."f;' i l!, ....n~ L:'S..uJ i.':-""___..1 I Lh_~_-::_~_..1
"-rnl\-:'::f' , I I I "I - " -s...':S j \\ ' '"" ...{,~ " n~ s.'~' ~ I "p=-tlI--- n,
"."J~~,iJ-i 'l" .f=:G:.':~-"'-;~-~i&:L -"ifil'!:! ~~~,~,~~~fi~~ 11: ;4~~:,:~i~;, ' Ii " lLc_:~_.;~
~, ,.... ~\' , L .J,' -~~,,r- ". ...--,."'~' ,,:; :!~ I , ~IT-r....--'n,
ri:L_' I I l --.... J:'- .J l'~7~~1 ..-" ./" ".,.~,... ~ .......~ :--...1: I -_-J! :L~_ ; fi\: : I ~ "K1'
.~ 4 ./" ~ ~ .. "-.J I I I I \~ I I '" n
" _ __----"-'"_ ,-,",,-'- ~.J!. /./ )~, :;-......: :::-:.: -J;nd ,_n_ -, --!-.' ' ',' Ie.. I -,I '
'. -I ~u'--~~ -= '.:' -.... ,~"-. ~....-- r _ -, :-:::
,~tsL,r -i~"IC""~""!-li! :::I'"~ ---]-' f~--~n-" --. it- - ,.~~.~ K li~:r -'''''S-' '-, ::'-'--~~...,.--,.:- ~ IT;-~::::;~~:l::i C
J : : I - I: r[" - :: -,: :. : :' ~ ~I ,....,1 ~-' ~-.._ .. in 1': J! ~
_ . ~u"'-- -_-' ~ f : r I: r" II p l:: ': a ': ~'I ,~ ' 'l: ' \- -~' r~'~--u- ~__n__. -, I,l : L ' J :
rr-n'::--"=:S>-i-}l 01 /,,1" I,:~ I" 1':1 '; 1 ~" \ '-/':' -,: :,-.,1 . ~_"':';n__'
I I: I 1:1 1) If I I~ :~~ 'I ,; :1 I II 'I ~:I I:. :-p,,--!!l!r"i ,i"\
-.Ii ":.1 I,. 1 Ii ":1 'IIi!--- 'I' 1 ''Kl_~N~ \ 1"1 "'.i 1:1 'I · I" , 'I Vi-rill
-~\>.~~)...=..,!_: ~L:'l.J:~:Li~L-r!J:~~:l'I I iilts- I ::"'\~-i-.J!i'- 5,'-i:"-i"tJj ~ j ~ ,J2-l2~~
':\. ' .~'t~~-i;:~~~!!) l/~~' I .. 'm m~ I ~"''7;
C-~
... -
lYd 8661 l~ :C;E :91 II AON paM 6HP'1Vld-13l:Jd\6HP\O'IGI86\(OJd\8~SPS\:
EXHIBIT
,--- i
I JI I ~ I J
gIIIII
! : 0 i I t
.~~'
.'"
!.
-2-
e
B - PLAT
>---..==,.
.-. -::::. '.r...- ~ "~I' -----.:...:.::..---..::
"-1I'I~"t_
___W~
.....- W _
........-.1.11"'"'11
1I":;~"1,i""
_:"..;.'1,,'1:.:. .=-__
iSO
'::INl 'U1V!:lO tV ,
1l0tYJCD4 'lY roo.
'NYi
NV1<J "'\111111 "'!J';""'"IJ!JJ ~)
NOll "'~O&jO:l ON.,.1 d:J t
'0113:)IHIOYi saOOM :JNI11QM i"'"
r'.\~
'!-i
"
g
I
: I I J J
~{iJdll
1IIIIIIf
It,.otlt
r:::..-
c:;;l
c:..J
L.&..!
-.J
-
1..5...
i I ~/7=J I
I i"'\ l L
I t.-..............--.J : :
::'---- ------~~-----=t-h------~-_, C9 ' '-. , I I(
~mn :,..-__,: :;--1: ~r--11 :r~=~1 f;=~~l f;==~::- rm1-1 ~ I..'
!I .... 1::' ... ,: i, ~ 1::1 ' '::1 loa 11:' "- I:! ~ I I: 1 r
II '1:0 ':<1 ,::, 1:1, 1;:1 I:: I II J
!I -;f l Jf :1 I: :, I: :1 I: :' II L__~~~JLJ I r.
,I /. ,I '--"j' 'L j' 'L j' 'l ': " , ,..-". _=u, ~ I
:1 J t.. - -1 :: ..... --- : I ~ - :: -. _.J: :l. I: I I 1 r
11..._- I I __...,... ----~...... L______I l.-~____.J I --J' I -. I I
.if t ___J"~ '---..__ :: I I: I .
- III ---. ---= ..,,;;;:(--s ,:
~ ...-1., - ---c-..r...;---...~~"''''"::-..-.:-....J: \
..... = -' ~ - ~~ '-J "
~-:~~. ,-:------::.-;::::tr;1 f~-'::'-'::'-~l fr-~=::": r-----_'~.,.~~' ~I \
"'1 r _ __ ::r : : : : II :r -- - I r-..- .. "". . , I \
~ 'r ~ 1, " " ,I " ,I I: 'I ,: 'r -', ~' l <-
:t:, I:lr ~::l lla I::, 1::I...........:~..,:J~ ,
:, I: II II []jll :1 1::1 1::1 1/. ,
----n:1 .. I::, .. I::' ,::r ~ '::1 I::, ,: ~..!/~'~'~
' .. J'lt -1"L '" _I:' ~" . li" I
~ :L - - - ::L.."":- - :: _ _ I ~~~ :L _ _..11 [L"'1-.- J: ~
:"'mm J l_m__ 1 ~__m_~l ~n__m L_m__J lu:'_ 1 I -'.,
t'---~ --------..... f'"----- ---/-"" .....-- -~ j"-~~---'t,..- ~ _~ "~ -' .... ....
__m_ i i---;-/-:..\,~--~\i f_::.:-~ ir-~-l! !r~ll -~. ~~~ .o":_ _ _ ~ ,/
r~1I' t c \\\ '::1 ... l.ii~. '::1 I: r '-~'~
" ~:-l \ .f~\\ '::1 1::1 Ii::' ': -..::-_~~.,~~~--.........--
---+- i ..<:~'" ......- ~\ \~ 11 :1 II ;, Ii :' I! fr~ ~ ~ -...,. .... IIit<'(l
, r",. ',... ~. ,\ _j"L__j"l__j, L_.J, I ------- II
I "'. '.., , \\.. - , , , , , , , r- ' ._____n, .__nu_, i ,n_unnn__,
l' -.:.....~'~~..... .....>\ \.-----... ..------.. ..---- -.. ....-----.... I ----,J :r---,: :r~-..,: I : r----, :
I ~..~>~... ,,~~ .... ~ _ IU I I: II ,: II 1: ~ 1 l \::1 t
... ..........V ;; "~' ""'JIr . __..r't I I I I I I L --l I
I ",~,._,~~ -, n !f t I I::, I::' i; 'I ' -_~_~_n_'
I I / " f 4: t....__-.J: :l._;;-_.J: :L_~...J:I' :~F~----,u~
, I ,'?, ....------., r----~ -~--------r~ ml ~ I I ... " ~ , .. { I ~ J :
L J.==___=~_j' J,. ,--; -- -, i i i~-; - --; ! 1 / :~:::::~ :::::::::~1-F:-~:::~ l' : I I :
r~-r---~-- -, 7 Ii: # " I 1'-:: ~d~ ..J I YI....., /' _"'\..........,\ \r-'::'~l: lr--l: ill ~_\k_-:_-:_-=_-='__J
..," : I I I ! : L I I l__~~~ ~_:-=.~ nJ I ~ t.......( \\ \\ 11:1 ,: I Jr-~-U:-=:-='--1
," I . _~_~_~dn' r-r==r~==- -, / , ',', . . , , "
: L. ..J I ~ r-r=--- -"::-f! ;~ :.....':1 7 t 1 - " ,.~: ~ .... - J\ \~..... I: :1 I: I! f: ..: !
-~--- L ~ ~:-_:-:.=-____J i' : f I : I l~ : ~{ I I .....~ ....___d \,..... '--Jl :L__J:
r--F--~- ~*i~1 : I "Irt:: ~ j: ~t r-"f"~~':.:~_. /:J. It...,.... "'''...___J L__~_n..: t_h.;---:::;: ~ ....JnJ
: I.... I : ~ ~__~___d__, :-~-~~::::~ 1I t : I ~~--l: I I I r-F~~~~--1
! L J ! i-r---~~~.,-~~! I I ~: 'I. ! I "I /,: I -l 1 *4-=----.~ III !, : ~: I,:
,-- ->==_u, ~ 'I , " ," \ ~~' L _:oA.--' , t.",."'- . .... ... II
r--F*,ntT~9-1 ~ / 1 I I ~ I ~ _~.L. I : ~--::~:.=:-~--\ :::::~-$ -.\ ~_!;.-..:;-::_-=_-J__~
I , r I I I l...- ..J I ,,-- _-.:- ~_-L.# r--r , "" ,-. \" ,..----, r-~---' r-F~~ _~~
- '" '., ===----, .---r------- , ~S\ .. '> \ \ " " ,. , " '1Ioi
1 L~ J! rw-:--r..;;~'=i--~ i ~ ----\" ~' \,. ~}.':"'"""\~\ 1//~""-""1 :("r-~! 1~-~:1 iIi, I, ",:,
Io____&_~~~_~" 'I I II ~ "f' \ 4~~"Ioo\ 'I. "....\ /"'/""--111 r.' ,~
~-~--I. r~~r~-:::'-, 1 1'1' I~:: I 'j \ \ ~~~" \.?....."s.....;;. IIIJ \ > \1...\ /,'/1 II :1 ,I :' ': ~~h-.:=_~~~nl
: I I: t '"III... I: ,-__l.:-_-!:~~::..~_~ \\\":. '\' \"..._ ~ >..... .."'\ "....,J ,'/1 : 1,1 1,1 I,
. : ~ """ : 1o_i"S:_- -~-~""""'!!__J r-~--f';', r---"1 r~--'" ~~. r-( ....r...~ \ \ /1 I: II I: :i I: I r-F~----~~~~
I I I I r-;-=:- ~ -:I..::I:~--1: _ I :: 'I \ \ \ , ...;..., \ ',.,"-___.J: :1...-...........11 :l..--n : I ,-,':
. ..-..l---~l:._---.A,..J I 1 l:r 1'llr~il '\\\ \ \ .!.I#;..>f .... \.fA \ =:. II 5!: r,.. I : I I :
I'; I I . II ... II II ... II \ ~ \ \ . \. '\.!/ ..;/ 1/ I ...-----~~ ....l l..______J L.___ ~J I 1 . I
r-I-~""-""---;r' I I I "I I ... ,::,;;:. \\ \\ ~ \" '" \, / ....;. /" / ~i ,...~_____"'\..~ ___.. ,._____... ~:___=~_~n.#
I I I I I L.. : .1 , , I '\ \ ~ ... ":.::., " ,^".., I' , I I I I I f o..;;:;~ __.,
...: "to ......: c I.~~-~~~~_-J__~:I -1::1 \~~\ '\ .~:\:.. (..., f/ ........,I:r---,:lr--1::r---d. ,-F~ I,
I I I I r----~~ ~ 1 1" 'I \1 I \" ...... '- ,,~I II'''' II, '" I I tit I. .l : r ....1:
'L -1 I , r I 1:1 I I I ,\ ~\ ") ...... '-/.''; I II 1'1) I' II II I : I I :
u~__ ~-:F;:~~~:;-~, II' ii' ~i:L .H.. ~\ .',L</".... 'Vt~" 'i:/ '::' ,i:, Ii ' ~_h_~_~~-"'!_~
", 1 1 " I L - ~ ~ -.J 'I \~ . I ~ \ ~ _...r ~ ..... ~ I, :1 I: II I: :1 I: ~
I L~______...:~__J r-~- __J ,,--~~--~ ~ >' ~..: -.JIlL _ JilL JI 'L .J I . l~r~-~~'9--1
- U_,:'__~-~L! I . --..: ,_~--""" /) ~~~ ~---':_J l_':::::_H~_:__j ",'/" j- i: .,: i
. r~~F ='~~-9-. ~ ,....::...."): f............ ;:.............. ~ to,. ~_::-:_-.:_~_...d ~
-"--: I.. I: f ------':( ",r" ---- ~ ~~~~. ~-..-.-- :-f""'~ ,--1
: I I : :--:'--1 r-:::-, f--! =-1 r=-~1 ~ ....-1: :1 If:1 ....~..,1 :........ ... : I I :
L. --1 ':',: r ': :f...,. l r. l::r I: :1 'I :1 I: :' ,: :1""'......"" -:"--'1 r--~-----' i--~~~~--' : I ~ f :
.Ir:-f~--=~-j :: :ii: "H I :lJ: :1;: :i!: :i:: :l!: -~:!I-~,!:~---1i :~"I Lk~_-=____--JuJ
... : I II :1 I: a I: a 1: :1 II :1 I: {, ,: :, I: J, ,: :1 ,: ' r- - ~--1
-: I I : !L':....t,' ',tL_~J'" O','L .:,.J',' .:L~':.J,: :~~-Jl ,:L_~J: :L~"'-...--,I,' ,:L___-..Jl, :.....___..11" ',IL___~',' :,' I, ~II:,
J ~u'--~~--,.,.._~Ll I ". , r.
------. I I 1..._ I I _ J ~nn__l L ~n~'tJ L~~~ ...J L. ___J l___~ ~n__J l~_ ~__J L~_~t! nJ e: Ll.-.-~______...J__J
!
'x/
-.~ ...
~,
/'
./' \
..- \
"J
~, ~ ~ ' }'
~ .-L-.._~~.~~
'~/ ~-
... ...
,
!
I " -
'-
,
----
"
I .
/
,,'
_~m
.
J__
rc-3
'fI
lYd 8661 LO :OZ;gl II ^ON paM 6HD.1Iln-13lJd\6"P\O'IZIB6\~OJd\8~SPS\:O
EXHIBIT C .. UTILITY PLAf\.
n~'IIIII"1
~TlJ __
- .. ......
~'MI~
~.M1-.t'11;1
1 .~ I;; ..",.,.--~~
- _=...::'.:c ~-.:o II
- ';li
'llNl "UVl:lO ;!!, .
JIO'''i1~ 1.1. .....0.
N\(ld lOl;ltNO) NQISOI;l) I~
7i )NIOVlJ) )'UVNI~1I1JlJJ
NOlt \(I;lOdlJO::> al;vl d) IN
'Nn 'Ol13)IlNO~4 saOOM )NIllOI;l I
.
" /
II
1 ~1 ~ ;
I II!, ! XI ~ 111 J d : I
~ I { J II I' I;, Ii ~,--" II II n ill h: II!!,
II I I I, J I I III !i1i hi IIII E ~ _, I: ~:gil:~i
I ~ II! I I J J I If f nl.l!i!llill I ;\l M - II I' ~"':I I :ii
.....~ . '-' 'ii II'l, II . · 16 ~ :..
· ::J11:'Ir;1t'OObll dl:llllhll! 111\ il ~I';,ih ;:: !II
a II, U f '( .0' ........- I: I I'll ~
if a\' )~y~~ ~-I'~~~!
:>-. '~---03-i_ ~~:+rv/ h\:; L _ \~ / L ~ ';
- -7!" ~lK.v.-'E~~' ': im-' "i7~?" ~ "'~ ~ ll~\!
J---r ~~~~ 'dirn~I:i\-.-lL~ 1 I .~: / I \"~'\("..!J)--j----~~~ . )llal
I 11 C I: I r )'1.........' 1 I' ,I ':L"'---T:: ~ J ',:. . ~"'-... ;/. If
. 111\ :, ~~. OMS] :;10.\$ 1:8K,,, I:~: L:~::U l:/ '~.. .,l .,-:., .''2~'> .
~II"" ,'1-' ': ,:n...,:: ,: 1i1.....~~I~ l .: . . '~~.
Hi\.1-. . -- -.' - .~ '.- "- '3, ~~~1 " ~~ .. "'_.~ 0 I
: ~.'1 ' ~ '. /..J.. _
\ ~ -- -. '''-iik-'-'''- :;0-'+1-.- ~~\'"'::-'gl'~~ \ tt . ~ ~.
1 - _ ; ~',.......... ---", ~~ '"' '%. '.__' ~ _,
. --. ,.,..-- - ~ ~. ""'" --.
. -r;...."'" -K".;;:r:Q --- _ ~ r ", _I<'>-. "';"-""'< -; , , _ I .
:.:::. ....- - Ir-. -l: ,~'r.,:,,-- \.......~. ~ ~ I '"
--- "'.... , ,! " ,.' . J. ". \" 0 I "-
' : ~ ,',} \ \it'r7,:j} ~ <'Ii '!li..U,,, ~'" i' /~
:-: -~:Jt~~\~~7;~~'~~l,~) f l '\ ~~~'~":.::--.--......... __(J'~"~'h-lp.::- ~"~ v'
,0____ --~~~~" -~..:?i"i:r--:.LJ:h "1 '1;{ A~ ~..~~~~. _.-=- : '1''- ...~ ~p
/' '- \\ ..' I! ~ I' 'I I: : " 'I' _ --::::. N_ .. N'" .~; .
I . ~'K liU'L""Ti'j' '1lr,~'l! s, j """,.. .\ IY "'tilimn_: /l\11.
'.~" ,I ,",,\ ;;,;; 'i:c:-: "Iii-- "" ~'.:i1 ' ,~~~ ;=c=;;s A' !'I" ': \; 0 I: \j
~}~~''- - /~"'~-]lR"mjf.':: - J~;:J' . : 01'I~ili;II':_"11;1, 01 i I t~:m L
- ,~ .... "-". .,,,;>. 'W,_ - "7 "-..,..?--H- Iii II.- ":::t-/.i1 : : rr rn.-~ .nO
~ I 'r--.."., -"'" ,.'..-n;;" ~ - i .L...._~...JI J'o..~ --': ~_::J, 'm I
n_n I~~/~}-.. .., ( :~:t_~~m:~,~;::-__~ ~ ,i3i ~
---. ." - .i' /~I,A- ---'-, ~_: \ _u___n~ ,n +.. _'. i. __ ___ _ )
E-... -r '/jl. ~'-~.~"'-~\JflJlr . ~ f ~! '... )./,.' ~.-""L:: , I;F. _;\_
;i . .G.~=__~ 1/ ,/ - '" ,tL 't;. -l:~' '. ~/. '. - ~ r ....-;\l~OMS f.:'Ii;f: :]"[ 'ru g i~ : (
mn .wc~' 7-' v 'I'~"_O' n m . / I 'VI """'"""'<'''''~':Rt lill...."\ . l'
\1!. 0; . ii~ 1 .f ~U:>m~~~'f t"l-!' ~, j ~- --- ,\. !~i 6i1-<;V-.---' ~-~~jj~ ~ i1;j: ~:.""'.- ::1: (
. ... ~ - ~ ~~ J ~ 1m", I~ ~.. -'b.l, Norml \:~ ~\r-'J , I ~ : ~ 9
,,-- ti.K-~-~' R .. 'L .... ), -.,..-'....$'0 . .,...._~ . I Vi ," ': i: _ 6....,,;;;;,>..~ -"--
~: \1 1\.: (iT'- . n"'_""_""~__' r""j-'-7i=-"lll ,. , 'f{ -.'..--:' _:!-, .... T ~__ .""'''' ~ 0
~~. : -I 1. ~, ~ rr- ... -"0J'~ '" .. _. - - J..; ,.-~ ---\ Y /. on _._ ~. :--:-..;_ :
~~- ~' .~-~ --~. ~l , e ~~~~. .~t~ \. \M;::.~.- '\ '~~ ':1-':.:';: 0 ~ i~": ~t:: '" ~ _ J ~
'-..-- I 1--;';- \ 't\ __m n-..'" .~~, 1,,,,- I 'i ~.~'N.'~.... ;.'/ ~jl' '!;. m____~.L
~l:~h~'ll). f'fiW;Q~\\Sh~~''.--:>'~,~~i-~rc ) ~ (~.J
I ~ ';JEll' .~, : !H~ sur ,r'^<;.~\~."'\..,,\\ .x\'~ ~'" }4p"'\:.."": >-L: " ~ ..l G.~__ tJ. ~j;: ..""'. _.
: ; I : \:':'. i' I ~t~,.7:\ 'e' "k" 'e '\'..'Ii .",,, \. "fi-""", -; ~n . - ,. ".::"i' ? f!'Pr"n;
::':-:;~~i; ;~ ~ .:~~0!1k1 :; ~''{\~j' ..~~':(~ ':l; ~ .~_ :'''' " rU.i!~~ ~
J['rn j ~i lV1f.:ln'TJTh. ::' ~~ry ''J~~!q,I''']~'': .t!Zm:B
~'~~1\L;~~~~-:~~~::-;;~, ~~~:' ~~:,,: ~ r:i~N~C
o if,~F.-TIi If- ,-y _,n:_: ~ -;,~::: I~ 'I ~ l ~8J lI1~IX~' ~ 1 ~7r - :r_~mu4i~~' :: I ~~ IIT)1r~~~:~-!~
-=-r-----I.~~..l] ~!; ~~i 8J iir;;;-jf'mtt]i/L~~:i~L~'iit\:, ':i[~~~~\ ~ Ii: 8J i~J:~; d~e' 'I :~\]
~I~ "\ I , 1~~I'f= *--1' \J:'L,I:~ I, '''.J 'I.- _~ ,1..__ ,lib [', I _ :~~
": . e'!' , ~IL'..1' i~ :~ il L - ~ J:/CI.. - 0 - ~.............-~... J ~~ __J\~ ";-kn ' _ m.~ S !n_~_ n ~ "-
----- . , , ':--"J..--q ,I;" -=- ~X"""""_">""n_ .. , .
J~ ~n' (~ . . ::. ,..,.- .1.... ~) I ) /
~ ~ \' ~ II I ~ 4"
'- -. ~
./
I
L
e"~
jVd 86GI s:E~j(HfBI6fOV613ij~\6GRA!DING PLAN
;/
.
.
.
G.P. LAND CORP
J 200 NORTHDALE OULEVARD
MINNEAPOLIS, MIN ESOTA 55448
Phone: (6 J 2) 754-7337 F' x: (612) 754-7557
December I, 1998
Monticello Planning Commission and City Cound
250 East Broadway
Monticello, MN 56362
Re: Annexation Request of the Southwest Quarte of the Northwest QuaJ1er in Section
19, Township) 2), Range 24, Wright County, Mi nesota. (Rolling Woods)
Dear : Planning Commission and City Council
We request that you annex our above described property into the City of
Monticello.
Sincerely,
~-A~~'
Vice President
. ,.
S e-"
EXHIBIT E
/
.
.
.
6.
Planning Commission Minutes - 12/1198
DRAFT
Steve Grittman presented the staff report poi ting out that the 40 acre parcel is connected
with the Wildwood Ridge development to th north. Troy Marquette Drive will provide
access into the Rol1ing Woods development. Since a portion of the development area is
wooded the City was looking at preservation of the trees and had suggested the option of
have Deer Street end in a cul-de-sac in the a proximate area of Lot 7, Block 1. Park
dedication, drainage, and the location of pat ways and sidewalks were also covered in
the staff report.
Chairman Frie opened the public hearing. P t Simondet questioned whether Garrison
A venue was proposed to be eliminated. He noted that the road has been at times closed
off during construction of the Wildwood Rid e development and is in a deteriorated
condition because'ofthe work being done in he development. He also asked why he had
not received notice of any public hearings ev n though he is adjacent to the project areas.
Ted Holker also spoke on the condition ofth road and informed the Planning
Commission that the Township had sent a lett r to the City addressing the maintenance of
Garrison A venue. Mr. Holker also questione why the township roads and cartways were
not incorporated into the developments. The staff indicated that the City was trying to
eliminate situations where there were shared r adways. Questions were raised on the
design of the roads, volume of traffic on the r ads and the location of arterial roads. Mr.
Holker stated that the county is looking to im rove County Road 118 in the spring of
1999.
Ted Holker asked to see some elevations so h could determine how the drainage would
run. Jon Bogart, engineer for the developer, e plained the drainage plan for the proposed
development. Drainage will be through a 15" ipe to the north thus bypassing County
Ditch #33. The wetland mitigation will be re iewed by the LGU. Ted Holker noted that
the cartway runs through this area and asked i the developer was aware of that. Jon
Bogart indicated that a diversion would be in lace that would separate the runoff flows
from the proposed development. Chairman Fr e then closed the public hearing.
Fred Patch pointed out that the proposed Lots -7, Block 4 are double fronting lots with
frontage on both Garrison Avenue and Troy M rquette Drive. It was suggested that it be
made a condition of plat approval that the lots ave driveway access only on Troy
Marquette Drive. Mark Woolston, the develop r, indicated that the Bakkens residence
which is currently situated on Lots 1 and 2 wo Id like to have Garrison A venue as their
street access. Rod Dragsten asked whether it could be noted in the title work that these
lots would not have access to Garrison Avenue Mark Woolston indicated that there will
be covenants for the development. Chairman rie then closed the public hearing.
.5"e.. "
EXHIBIT F
- "
~.
--.-
Planning Commission Minutes - 12/1/98
Rod Dragsten asked why sidewalk was incl ded as part of the development rather than a
bike path. Steve Grittman replied that the athway plan didn't include anything in this
area. The Planning Commission also addres ed concerns about having just one main
access into the development. The develope was asked for his reaction to the suggestion
of having Deer Street end in a cul-de-sac in order to preserve some of the trees. Mark
Woolston responded that the cul-de-sac wo ld actually require more area. The street loop
would take out less trees which the develop r thought would be preferable. Chairman
Frie noted that the proposed Rolling Woods development and the Wildwood Ridge
development appear to complement each ot er and that some of the infrastructure costs,
such as the booster pump for the water tow r, could be shared by the developers.
.
MOTION WAS MADE BY ROBBlE SMI H AND SECONDED BY ROD
DRAGSTEN TO RECOMMEND APPRO AL OF THE ROLLING WOODS
PRELIMINARY PLAT WITH THE CON ITION THAT ALL LOTS WITH THE
EXCEPTION OF THE BAKKEN HOMES TE HAVE ACCESS OFF OF TROY
MARQUETTE DRIVE WITH SOME TYP' OF BERM BEING UTILIZED TO
PROHIBIT ACCESS TO GARIUSON A V NUE AND THAT APPROVAL OF THE
CITY ENGINEER IS NEEDED ON ALL NGINEERING, GRADING AND
RELATED ITEMS. Motion carried unani ously.
MOTION WAS MADE BY ROD DRAGS EN AND SECONDED BY RIel-lARD
CARLSON TO RECOMMEND APPRO V L OF A REZONING REQUEST FROM
THE A-O DISTRICT TO THE R-I DISTRI l' SUBJECT TO ANNEXA nON AND
FINAL PLAT APPROVAL. THIS IS BAS D ON THE FINDING THAT THE
PROPOSED LAND USE MEETS THE CI Y'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND THE
ORDERL Y ANNEXATION AREA LAND USE PLAN. Motion carried unanimously.
.
.....f;c...'7
, .
.
.
.
Council Agenda - 12/14/98
SD. Consideration of a rovin
07C - ArcoD Construction.
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROU
A final pay estimate has been completed b the City Engineer on the 97-07C trunk storm
sewer project that was primarily complete in the fall of 1997. All final payment requests
on improvement projects are typically app oved by the City Council prior to issuance. It
is the recommendation of the City Enginee that final payment be made subject to the
contractor providing the appropriate lien w ivers.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Council should approve the final pa ment request to Arcon Construction in the
amount of $21 ,071.28 for the high chool trunk storm sewer, Project 97 -07C.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is the recommendation of the City Engin er that final payment be authorized.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of final construction pay voucher.
10
.
.
.
..
WSB
350 Westwood ake Office
8441 Wayzata oulevard
Minneapolis, N 55426
B.A. Mittelsteadt, P.E.
Bret A. Weiss, P.E.
Peter R. Willenbring, r.E.
Donald W. Sterna, r.E.
Ronald B. Bray, r.E.
& Associates, Inc.
612-541- 800
FAX 541 1700
November 20, 1998
Mr. Rick Wolfsteller
City of Monticello
P.O. Box 1147
Monticello, MN 55362
Re: Final Construction Pay Voucher No.2
Trunk Storm Sewer - Monticello High Sc 001
Monticello City Project No. 97-07C
WSB Project No. 1079.00
Dear Mr. Wolfsteller:
Enclosed are three (3) copies of the Final Const ction Pay Voucher No.2 for the referenced
project in the amount of $21,071.28. We reco end final payment subject to receipt of the
following items:
1)
Satisfactory showing that the Contractor as complied with the provisions of Minnesota
Statutes 290.92 requiring withholding St te Income Tax and;
2) Evidence in the form of an Affidavit that 11 claims against the Contractor by reasons of
the contract have been fully paid or satis ctorily secured.
Please make payment in this amount to .Ar~h 2~Structiog .Company Inc. at your earliest
convenience.
Sincerely,
WSB & Associates, Inc.
~/l.~
~
Bret A. Weiss, P .E.
City Engineer
Enclosures
c:
Tom Bose, City of Monti
Tim Erickson, Arcon Construction Co.
om
Infrastructure En 'neers Planners
EQUAL oprORTUN TY EMPLOYER
~ 'O'.;'f
CONSTRUCTION P Y VOUCHER
November 19, 1998
ESTIMATE VOUCHER NUMBER:
WSB PROJECT NUMBER:
2 (FINAL)
1079.00
ERIOD ENDING:
November 15, 1998
PROJECT:
TRUNK STORM SEWER - MO TICELLO HIGH SCHOOL
CITY OF MONTICELLO PROJ CT NO. 97-07C
ARCON CONSTRUCTION CO PANY,INC.
903 EAST FOREST AVENUE, P. O. BOX 57
MORA, MN 55051
CONTRACTOR:
CONTRACT DATE:
COMPLETION DATE:
August 12,1997
September 26, 1997
ORK STARTED:
August 18, 1997
ORK COMPLETED:
TOTAL DEDUCTIONS
TOTAL FUNDS ENCUMBERED
TOTAL WORK CERTIFIED TO DATE
$224,554.51
$0.00
$0.00
ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT
TOTAL ADDITIONS
$224,554.51
.
LESS RETAINED PERCENTAGE
LESS PREVIOUS PAYMENTS
TOTAL PAYMENTS INCL. THIS VOUCHER
BALANCE CARRIED FORWARD
0.00%
$221,800.85
$0.00
$200,729.57
$221,800.85
$2,753.66
APPROVED FOR PAYMENT THIS VOUCHER
$21.071.28
APPROVALS
WSB & ASSOCIATES, INC.
In accordance with field observation, as performed in accordance with indust standards, and based on our professional opinion, the materials installed
are satisfactory and the .rk properly performed in accordance with the plan and specifications. The total work is estimated to be 100% completed
as of November 15, 1 'We hereby ~mmen1d payment ofthis voucher. ~ i -j) d-J~
Signed: ~ Signed: ~
Project Manager/Engineer ~
ARCON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
This is to certify that to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief, the uantities and values of work certified herein is a fair approximate estimate
for the period covered by this voucher.
Date:
Signed:
Title:
Contractor:
Approved for payment:
Date:
Authorized Representative
Date:
.
,"b-2.-
.
.
.
5E.
Council Agenda - 12/14/98
A.
City Council is asked to adopt a resolution which formally requests that the State of
Minnesota open up access points to High ay 25 at the future intersection of Chelsea
Road, Dundas Road, and School Boulevar . Both the Chelsea Road and Dundas Road
access points will be new. The School Bo levard access point allows extension of the
roadway to the west of Highway 25. This s an important housekeeping matter relative to
the Highway 25 project. Approvals by /DOT to open up these access points are
presumably contingent on the project mov'ng forward and the associated closure of
various access points, including the curren access at Dundas Road south of the Danner
Trucking site, closure of Oakwood Drive t the west, and closure and consolidation of
other commercial access drives to Highwa 25,
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Motion to approve a resolution req esting State approval of Highway 25 access at
Chelsea Road, School Boulevard, d Dundas Road.
2.
Motion to deny approval of a resol tion requesting State approval of Highway 25
access at Chelsea Road, School 80 levard, and Dundas Road.
c. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends alternative #1.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of resolution.
11
.
.
.
SF.
Council Agenda - 12/14/98
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGRO
According to the project specifications 1'0 the Monticello Community and Training
Center, the City (Owner) is responsible 1'0 employment of a qualified technical
inspections firm to conduct certain materi 1 construction tests and special inspections
required by the Building Code.
We have received quotes from three quali led inspection firms:
GME Consultants, Inc.
Braun Intertec Corporation
T erracon
$15,000
$28,353
$22,795
Each firm has submitted an acceptable ser ice proposal and general conditions contract
ready for execution.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1.
Motion to accept the proposal and nter into a contract with GME Consultants,
Inc., for construction testing and s ecial inspections for the Monticello
Community and Training Center p oject.
2. Motion to table all proposals for c nstruction testing and special inspections for
the Monticello Community and Tr ining Center project pending further
information (to be determined by ouncil).
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends alternative # 1.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Exhibit A - Copies of construction testi g and special inspections proposals from
GME Consultants, Inc; Bra n Intertec Corporation; and Terracon.
12
Sent by GME CONSULTANTS INC
612 559 0720j
12/09/98 8:22j Jedix #484jPage 2
. ....': ::"{.'..'",,:.,,.,.,
',:,.:.:: :,;..; . ::, :~:~'.:~<~:: :" :,;. :'. :.::
", ' '."'.'" .
"',' " ,
.....'... .
I':"", " " ,
.. .... .
\\..'.'
.:::',
(.:', .
,:",
:','., .
199a..' .
,'.,:.," . II
Gr.tECQ .silTA_ji.I~~~:
. . .<';: ,,' .' ;.: ""':"''''CONSULTJNG''eNGINEfRS:::';\<
:. ....::: '. 14 .' 2"~~:~.ND.rM~h~~:MN$B4A7);j:r
" Ph .rSt2i MS-18!5S' j:,)=ai.JS12J:i5ee;o720>..:.:'"
".;" .... .' ::.:::'.:;:.:>:'.:::.u;:()y..~y:;:;(:.j~.:.:,::~:::.i':>:::!~~~':\';~:>:
,'. .....: . ".:::':::::>:;,.:::',::':;,:,',:',
.... ",,::: " . :",::.' ...::;..,,::,.;...,
~:":: :
;"",
\'" , '
:....
~:..: "
........ .
..
.' .
.,'.... "
~: " .
, .
i,.:.:.. .
'::,"
-,," .'
,......
'. '\:"',+'
" .
...'\',',, .
',Ii',;'
for ,colls:t;ruction
.Monticello,
,';."
'.,"',
. "'.'
,'::'::'.'
Sent by: GME CONSULTANTS INC
612 559 0720;
12/09/98 8:24; Jedix #484;page 3
Sen by: GME CONSULTANTS INC
',',. ,"
612 559 0720j
12/09/98 8:25j Jedax #484jpage 4/18
'. .:.' .
. ".
",' "
"
, .' ,. ",.' .:"
, ,
'3'
, ..
. . " ' , ' . . ."
, . , ' : '. . ,
, ..
. . "
.,' :''; :.,
. " ' " :,
"," ::; . ::-,",",\'i:.
, ,
.. ',.' ..'
. . ".,
. . .. .... ",
. :.
. " .. '. .' .
..
" ,:,'.,..
Sent by: GME CONSULTANTS INC
612 559 0720;
12/09/98
Sent by: GME CONSULTANTS INC
612 559 0720j
12/09/98 8:29j Jedax #484jpage 6/18
Sent by: GME CONSULTANTS INC
612 559 0720
12/09/98 8:30; Jedax #484;page 7/18
::-C.: ,:<":;-"::',: :!\f\~ :1/):. . ,\ '
:.::::;,::'o':','c:;:::.'" . ' .'.c: ,':;'
":'?:':"::';' ';.' . :.; .:: c"i:i~ti':;';
: >>::" ':-. . ':';'
" (:,::':: ,'),?,' .::, " ,,','::
":::;c:' '. <:.' ".:' :.':
. ::, ,:': ~,',. ?/:
~~r ,9.* ):~:~:~8 :,:
;. ..... ". . ::.':.':,;,::;"i<:>
.. . . .,::. .:....::;:;::)(}:<':\ '
. C '':(:'. >, ~:h':,)/>::" <":
',.:<:::'; ./: . ..
':': ........ ,
.~. . c..: >:t-:'),:.,.:;:., ,.....'
".::::c: .>::r r:".:
el.'.,:' ,:::. '"
or.:.".."".::,.:;';:. ".'::: ':
ed' ::,",',":,;),,:.:'..'
.; : ..... . :'i::..sh;.? '300...,;-,
~.'. :;:.:'.,:..;>:;,: ::. ,.'\:.r,2T" ':':::,
af1~,:::: 'i:>;;".;\L.::": ;':'::::::: , ..,.
9 . ::::.:::-:': ,;'::..':" .';,,:
'al""":' ,,::;':".:. ';.,,: . .::
.', ..:. . ;,", . /' .' : '.:' .
"'i::::-':: .:': :... '. '. '.
eo; .'. .. ','.:,:':',;, . . 'C" :'c'
.' ::. :,':':'::: ':'.:""500 '::'; .'
..... :'. ':L'::' '.): ~\7'; ,~.:: ::' ,:\:?U'
:.... ..,.:.'::,:.:');'(i:':'" .:," :.!;):
.,:,:: .,;.....::..:.' (:}:>y::,:,: ,,': ,;.
:':,'. ..... "'''c':'':'::'',: .:",: :::::
i): <~:::':::;" ..' $~ij~ lQ:O':: ,:"
....: "', ;:. .' ': :\:}( {:;.:::>::. <::: "
:~;<.':' '.<.;:;:~:.., ,<)::::' -.:::: ..
':. ..:. .: ...'.,':: i
,<>:,:::".'. $::.;/' ~. ~g.O .:< ii
; '':.~:''::'''' .' /r.. .:. ,;:./:...::,
.::.... . :.:: ' : '0;;::"':'
.t:9BB " ~~'~"ao.o,-.:
:". . .:':'.'::<:, :>y:<ii:':.' .>::'
:,:.,:>::''"'':: .:,+:::..;;~:::::.. '''''. ,.(
co::, ::':::, '," .';. ,.'..,i:;:'.. .....::' ?(
,:'.;;.: ": "" .<T:~:X\::': ...,:::> .F)
:);.,..500 ". ,:,.:;X:::.. .::::::: ,:W;.':,
~.~~:~ $t~.~ ii~.::'::.::mJ;i
..... ,::,',:r.7:1,;kJ,}'r::::.::":'
:': >><:::/i::' ',:::: .:~..:. :': .. .:: "
". ::&6~edttIj.',:'.':,'::};d'::
~""":;':P I ...~.:.....:..:' ,'", . t
~:~:.':~ ~,:t'~:;;l\,.".~..ii". . :'. ' .
:"".t:.'.;,.to:,$~C'.;ed::,..... ; ,i'"
,:,.ou......"":::...:e::et....,.1::....,..,. :;", ''','
::.. '" . ~.:Y'." ~""f~'~':'I> :;", I" \ii\:)
;t:ij~.V::~~t,ual. . ...;,
unit';:::pf:i~~~s . 'c,: ;:':::;';:'
.' l'1ed~~ ~:: p!~e.a: ::,':;,,':""ii"1:':(:i)~:,
. ..;,':': :.,.:."": . .'
...... '''';''. :':' '.f .... : ':'.::' ",
":""":" ..':'" ..": ",
.:::: :,>,,::::: '.. :;" . .':'::,::i':::'V:;
:':>, :::::,':" ... :::\;:;..:
:.(:.:.... .::.' . ....~. :.. ':::,::ii::
:,':' .:'.{. . ... ,::'TY:::
,,:tes t ins' , ~t .:\:Y,l'::
Vl;rQt1metit:i'l':. :;"i::),,,
.h~ ': ..so :et@Sbr'-'.' , "
.T~:~' IJ:fO~~,~':: :::,.'
:..''': .' ....::...,:>,::',' ::
:'..:.' >::.:::>.: ".".'.' ../:<.::::.:.":....:
'. ..:. '. :'.'. . ::. ': .,: . \ ~ ~ ,:.;": >,": : ~:. , ;' r
. . :: ;:,::,:.. (::,:.' '...,' ::,:::;.:.';:,::
:;':.;:,,:::.::,:,':>'::'H(-"',;:::::::;: ,,'
. a$~~~tt~nd.:U::' :::::/!i;
:iauth~;.iiOI~I~_:I~~::::::ii::i!N:i,
e~:;';:8eW. " " '::
'. .: >::'.=', . , ~i:::: ,',
',~9:.::P~ ' . .~:.<
;,;o/::'.;::../:::.,;'''O:::.'f''i.... ,j',:'...:, ';"
.:.~:t;':j';'::"I~' ..<:::':f :'>..,.:
,:'::i:?';::' .. .. . ..
;..';~;ii. '~::;,:;.>::::.: :
.,': :.;'. '.,' ......:~::..l.:?;i:>.:::": .::
. ". ,,'.:,
"
"
INC
612 559 0720;
12/09/98 8:32; Jedix #484;page 8/18
.
..
~ : !',:
..
......
'.
"c., ':'.i.' ...' " . ',. '. . .' "'" .,. '. ....:..:" . .:" .. . " '.;;.... " .
"~ 'l'r~~y!'atch / ....,<> ........ . '};:.H, :;;'i::).::.;?r.~e0;::fil~fll.~;.
", '.' ,we :h~~~. '.e~.closed .:with'::~hi~ .pr~p6~'~ ~.:~/;~PY" ~~:i'(~~~;:~~~r.~~r:cCJfiijY~~~~h:.<.'
:.' The<te~s: c~:mtained in.: t;.he. Ge~e:r::a./c~IJ;Ci~t'ion~.:::::a;~a:.:1.n.~prp:o;at~:~:~h::::J'i~~in
.. and:(;.a.r:e'. an. :ntegral p~r~. of. thJ.s 'p ~()P~..~z:o~.eS~:1.Q~:l:,.~:~ng.~.~E!~~.~g.
.: '.,.;c~~,,;: : -:nF ~~:'~~R ~~:.. '..: . ,'.. .
.' " n:' DE Zt.1\'Jr{ -THE':,. . .'," .'. ,'''. . /.
::. r.......... ..n. ':;..: N=~' . .:...:.;:....:,:.::..:.... . ;c.:...::..:.......;..:.:.::::,.::;:.:....'...:... .~.
. . . .T LNoU : l'ME liE IIKI!A:r.... .'. '::~":~'::.::::::..::.i'.':i.:<:./:<-:" ::..:/.;:...:..'}/;'....'.'.:;:::>
. ,:..::.. ;,,::::. .. ,. '. . "...,,,.,. . . . .. ". .. ,:'.: ... ",: . . ':;::;'::riIj ''':.''
. "';' Cl~~;>:~: '1.'. . !" . ...: '.. I,., :':'{ ';:..',.;:.}!,;i;\',;j!Y
.. 'w~::/:loo~;\forward.: t.o.' wor~~ng with 'yc ~<()#.':;:~hiB..:p.;Qj:..~t.;).<.,ItL:.you.:~~~~+..n.y
::~::t~S~$::: regard~ng.: .thf~.::~rOP08:~. :::f~~~~B~ :'d?:::.f~7..:~:~e~f:T~~.\.: ::,:,:':;,!'?'~~~:~f:T~
:~};::F>':~ ..' .. . . ..:: ... .... '. . '."" . . ...... )::}~:nYk?F':i::
.. ,;'i~2~L ...:. :',: . .. . '" .. -::. ::: :"<>/i::..: ':::::<>>\.:'\:'''>::: ::-:.: :::'.>>:> .':;::T<'>(LL::<~.:'.::'::"
.'. s,~~~.~raly., " ., ':: ".. . :. ":' . ",". ... :.": :" :> ........;/::;.;:;i/.. \......:
.'. ..~.. . O~TANTS;INC.> .....' .... .);:,:\:.~;<,;.~I';;<
~. ..::-:::':...:
.~'" . ;- :.:...... .'. . ..>.'
, .. .' ~ . :. ,,:-."
, ";.I:'-.. .... ...... ': .. ..
ste,!,en~i-;q;.t ':.Ruesink/ P', E~:' ..
.:~c:~:j~:~~gineer::: .:: :::: :.,:[ .<
~:::ff'.~' .. :. . A.:j:......:',. .':
ii:fJI:;:::) .. V~.", ,"
.'.."'.'.:;.;,...:.... ~:".
...'. 'l'b~;as" p:....: venema/"P. E~.: .:~. 4. .. "
Il~~:nq.~p~:l : EngJ.neer/vie~t..presldent.. ." . ::;:.::'.,: ". ,.... ,,::..':;... '.' '''. . . ";:': < . .::.:::>:~,'. ....... .
:';::'i;d\','J~ .7;:U(::...: '.::. ..' :. : ..:.:::; .:. . .' :.: ><.;-::/." : . :.~:.;.'::'::;L:::.::::: .:-:< ::::'::.;/::>.::::.:::::(<,,;.::.::.:.~.::.:
:: ~n~~os~~~.: Resumes' .:.'. ..' :'" '.,'" "".. ..: . '..""'" . ":". '):.n .,: .';'.' . \::; ,,: .
'.;:F'::< .'1/':::"';'
::::; . :::::,:?
.'''' .-,::..:::..:-.:'.
ACCEPTEtJ. . '.
OATE":::->:" . .....
'.'ie."';;'. '..:':: '.' '..
FI~::;:: :}(;:::.. .:'.
:'. AtlTHOJ,IZID "
.. l\l~::i..,<,:. .:.;:- ...... "
'.",.(: . GJ7: .(pleUe print:) ..
AtlTIiORIZED " ..
S-~~~~~S.; .::...': '.;:. ... . ." . .....' ."..... .. ..,,,.:::::::::::::i '. :::;:::H .. .
'1'I~" ':': :..' ,," ::. " .
"F:iFm:.s:~:'. . .' .' .' ..
:2 ... : :;: ..
IOI):nMk ..'.' ....
c.\s;nt\tt01f...OONY.8RO ... ..
" "'.' <rc .'
iF .
,,' .:,'>::',:' ::
::.~ ':W>< ..
'.... ,," ::; ....
. ~.:':.' . :",".;::,~'i.; .': ::':;' .. " .. "'\'.i::
. ,... ',\.,,' . . ." ',.'.. .....,..:. ". .. .'" ...... ......." ..... ,.. ...... "..... """1:::"'1::':.'''' . :;:Xf;lo;l' ,"
;"l\~'; ...... ..... "'. .,... ... .... ...A".\' .... .'i'l.';::i').:'~~?,.;r, ?:~~'l?.
. ." ::,:,.':" ". .... .. . ." . v:'.:rrr"':':'
"',I: .. ii. . ii.. ..... ..' .'f';; ':".i~.'>".;'; mi;ll;~,".
".
Sent by: GME CONSULTANTS INC 612 559 0720; 12/09/98 8:34; Jedix #484;Page 9/18
, ." '., ':<. >........ . .. ""'" '.: . . '''.:"., " ' " '. ," ,. -.;-;... ,., " ,:'1~'t'~,)~iJ'l1'f'i':'::'" (ii:.",
:<~;':.::'i:F:: .'. ":':: '. ',.. r ,':/" .' ::'<:":".<:,:;'. Wi::;'::':. .. '.. ..:.({i.<r.: y:: ..~r .~<. ': '" -:; . ;.::;))" ::.</..:'>"> :;: :.>:.''' ., ".,!' I
It{( .. ,'" , ":"..>: .' ':; ~".' ......' .;:; . .." " .. "'''. ... .'..' .:., ,....:......
.. ,';:, :" ", '..,.:,'" "':"'. .,". .:.." :.-'.' '.' .. ". :""".:
;:,":;:":~: , ''',':':. "'. ...:....... ,;:.,: .:,:;,. ....'..."..... "~ '~':\:/:i:
::,::.:...:';0 . ....,. . . ..; : . '. :.:. "u: ." ".... ..,...,....... . YVC?(It.. :';.'.,
il:J>::"':' ;.:' ('.. :.:\.: : . . . :i.::-::. ... . ::-i.' '>~'< ;:::.:: "'<:.'- .',);:: '.:H:;' '.::"::::::'.'; ;:,,;' .":". .': ~ ~ .' , ,
k~::'I)l::,:.':::::; : . /~;. ..:.:i:.... :-GME~..CONSUE .:~t:.IN~T'<:" ..;.:.::.::...:-:',....:'-.>.:..,,}: . :'!"" .'. .'.'\:':.
. ".:::,".: """'. .:,:::;:--.": . . '. .......::. . :','.::." ." . ......;.-.::,.:..,....,.:',... ....,":, ""., . .;.:, ...
"..' ":.i'" ......,. ,:.,' . . . .' :; ..:.:.' ',-,',{',." .. ':: ....,.... .:.-........ ''',.,:.,.''':,'.:., .-, .
E)( :: ," :>. .:::"...;.:.>.':..... .... ::..:::.::.:;..~./2'(.:.:....;::::<.:.: .':..........::.>:..........:;.,,/:"::..:.. ..:....\.
'^,'.-;'.' ' ::-. . '. 'J'.E'DOVI .r i:~ . ...' '/,\{:..,,::;:":';-.Yh ..~.::;:.,.;:,., . ,. , ,
F\::':.'<": .> .:.:.:-:~.:..~~~ A'J.:.: '",Hif;(~.::~:.LL);;:r:.:.i>:::i.:.,'J:<::::(<.j: <.,.:'.::.', m.' .~..".
~.: ',::'" " ~.:..;. .::::' ..'.. :~'nlot. IF;t.tJteN.W. 1,"CllmChZn:'~:;:'~":'~,~/' " - , ::':; \ . .:~. " ~ '". ." .... '" .~,' :'.
v{\.~ :.:.: : ',. .' ';::,,: .:':'. .'" 'c;, -.; :....: ': . '..:..< ..':;:r:> .:. ::.:::''');> :':',':;':":,,,::;';.'i//:'/.<' ,~":::.':" . .;.",>;;":. .
k;:.: .... "'.": ..' :.:....::-i. ..>':. . ....!:. ....:n,-.;~.'i'i.:.:.:..:-...:::::.',':::::>:,,::h::,Y}.'>~...:.... ';',":':'''''.'<. .
" :'." ,',... . .' '. ".. . ..' ,: ,," . .. :".. ..;;. ". ,,,.,.,.. :..,....",i.'.,.;.:.:.. . " .
,..., .'., " . ,'. ." '.. . :'... ..' .... .:' ..... '1,.;('''' ''':'.' . . .. ,;.::: .:-...,~:.;:. . . ,~. ; ..
. .,~. E....nC' "'''nJON '... :: ':' ;'. '. ....' '.': .... : :.' ,.:" :.' :"'m<~: '.' . .:':.::.- .;::: ". ,::: :k. " "x:: . '::::";':':':~:"" .,......:. . '.)" c-:.."'.
r~.c~: :':i::,w'loI' ~:...~,... . . .'..., ,:.: . ...'.:...;..,.. ','
',~:"":':':' " . :"""< . "'.' ,..--:.....::: '::" ..:.... .:..:?:..(:......... '.' : :,,:.:':::/..:.::....,.:~::. ;'--X .'. :"':,,'
:"":'!.::-:~ . ~ ";i'iJJd' . "."". .J::': :; )., ., '. ". .::; >>>.;. ..' "':.:."" ".'..
W~-~.}::':: .;> .. . A..Oc:latesot Arts. in MqaDiw:Dl~in.:i:nd 'Desiga:'I,.~~9iY :: :, :>:::::": : >:.: ::/::i::t :':.:(X:(r)."::.::: "i..~'~'. .', :.:. :'." .
-::'~":'." ..:.' '/ St~ c[Q~ T~a1 collo~t. s~: ~~~d~ MI.iui!90~*~~..~<~~~~\...: . : .-:. :': .::::,i/....::.:(:"'.:..: ..:', ". .>.:. :. :....'( .
3:. ...-: :'..':"i". .' ,.l':":<?>. '.... . :'..:i.:.": '. ..-..... ".i"'\':;'" ..... .
tt:i(:': '.< ~ <::: . ,NorNte~tlve Testing'atm M~~::r)raftiDg ":,> '::.:(;:!,' .:>,-.:.::..... ':::':, '-.'~:: ::':::>:,;:' .:.:..::.::--.. "'.':.:- ":",:.::
(,{":: ".. ' ~ :HurehitilOn Teehnic:a1 College :Hu.o~ .Mbme~tl :'1!i18i...t~8:":- '::::.:. ,/: .:'::::::. .'):<.,::;-: ." .:< ':- :'."
~:i';:J:.::.:i": ." ''':: : ..... .~: :.:"c:'::' '. ...:,"", '::f'~\:'.:.:":.":" ..::.::".:::'::....',.:::::::::/......":./., ,,' .:,
~,;"'."', .".::--.- ' ':'l:"",-,,:,',:""."",":'" ." ...,..> ..;:::\::- . <. '.: ..:. . """:", .'" '. '.>
.. .' '".-,:" '..i' :,. '.', . '. :.:' . :'.: ,:,.:;.." " . . "-,
wr' :/,:::'" 'n~,'i:'<:'" ..." .. :.:"'. ;,::~:i.:" . ::i>:: ;:'>: .:-..:......... ::', :.. :." :
':'" ." ,~1:JF[CAnON ...: . ..' '.:'..' ".,,;,;:,.... :c: '.:' ......,.. '" '.. U.'."
;}.~::,:.., ..:, " . . .:............:... . . ":::: . '.:',.,.;::: .... :-:-'..' ".:.:.: .::-:.. :.'~ ',;: "',, ,'..
FC....... :. :' ......,;,';.,;':...::-:;:.:. . . ........ . :';.,.. ::.,., ".,:ti.:. . .... ;',':'.,':,:.:.. ..;'. . ... "." . ::,' ,
,.',,'" , ,..,.;,.:..'.,....'i'<'.L~ .' .:.:." . :,..,-- ", ..::,:::,-, ',. :..... ',' .', ',',.
j(;:::'.,;'.. '.- '~~hOUr;HAZMATTraiD~.. ""'.,,)";,,:.-. ::')::' ':,.:;~).;''-:...." :. ,",- ',.:.:"".:''': ": :.:; "'.: . ..
;t.<<::;.-./..' ::i.~;o;:I.n~;iL;.;)rr .'''''' :." . ,,"':;;'.:: .:'....>{':'..-:. '.::".:":-.:::.::...'.,,;>;' -.',,,'. ",,;,~ ".
~';..::....; ::.::: .....", l-1'WllPvoTc~':(~~I. Grade I. .~ODCrc~Jf:~,';TestU1g:.. I:': .'>;':,>.,.. .. ".:':-: .' .,: ,...;. '",,' ,,:' ."'. :: ,"", \,!" .
[.;'(\:i.';:'i:\. ..- '...' ,Wlox:tor Nbclear Meter Cert,iflc;atipICi'::):';'.: ... .... :!::': ~: >;:i;;::<':.. :.:,:-: .:: [':<::':'-:':'.'! .: :?::;: . . '.' .'!, 'J~, .;
',. ::':' ".. ::::::i"::';:'.;''-:: ,:,:::.;.;;-.'::.,:;.;'. . . :.: ..:.' . .< '..::,::. ,"',..,/:.; . ,:: .".'.::. .' .,.::;. . ,...
~:;-.:::=-(-:::: ". '" .- ',:,:;:'\!::::':'::' . . '. i:>,:,:... -:., . ..:.....,.,::< ..\).;:: '., '. :.'::' ;.....-;.,.,::.. :.', '.: ::. .:,:-,.;,,,...;: ';':.' ':. /'.:
\, .c"i". . . . '. ':", ';::::':< :. ':t.."" '. .,.... '. ,';:, .'. .... ".
L.:'.:..::... .'" 'Il"'V1Hl'ri~iu~~ : ....<,; -: . '. .:::.), .,Xi( :," . i.:,::,""!: :....:.:.. .',: ,.,"ir, .
!'>,'; ""i iiilC Sonior M;,cri>I~~~DI.lu, GMEi~,.j..J;,lac.d~~D~li:.~~', . ". :~ijW ..iitlPJi
: ':!i'I" . . Etutitsj~l~ observatioJl(.and' te.tiq:;pf ~~rk J~'~,ij~ql; comple'~~:tt.tdelni'h~l~_. 'ad ;!;.::. ,":;':':(i,;
~" . :, . co~n;i!il,;:.:8hd induslrill dC'lctopmeluli :::;pbscrvltion:lI nCIi:t~W1i/ot .COllCtetCI::DI"4~G:t)l}:ji4::.b~;::paV41~L )+
;.: ')!>. ;;";" ~~on~.;m interprct~~~ ~r~~a~~:i~ 5~lfi~~:OnS/.~1~~~ii~~~~.~;~t~~r::O~~f.~h~ ~ffi~~~' :)':'
'j ." _tljea/llg, """"i;" ". i' ','> >.;::!ll;:'j':!:,0&Mi""" ,\;11
~!i:i', .,....' · ~:~r.;~~~:~~=it~~=~~~i~~~~~~, .;~
f:\ .:{':!.: 4@igt1oi.i~rieated partS. -weld ~~~k~ pt"'~~. g ~~\} Worked::Wkhraa~.;~.)~q-'r~~~' ,;:
i:i}.:': '. :' '.;' . d#:ritw!~ of liquid prod\ltEi~~: and: ~ir' ~::;-.' ~. p~a~tl~.' :C~~;\~~':rulil:~~~~~;.l?Mi,)H~ "'._~:,',!.::,,!;,."
i':'i'::-: ,'. ,,: -Ut~;;;'~ji::i'.,:,::;;,;:,w: an IBM ,."'.....nrer.lvst._:;.;: ". ::.". ,,::;:(;"~t '. .:::i"'::,:i"'i:~:;:'::';'; ~::Tt: ;:;_:.,:....:::'-.;,::::.;::.::-:.::'.;:i,':.
.:' ". .'. "
W':'::'';:: '. . , ''!,'.;:: !'J!~~::.~'!'~:-:'!' .~.......~, ~'. .'. ..'. . '. ::i:::':!';.':;;: .: .:,,'. ,i';.: ..:,..<:::::';::.,...:'....;.:.:i'~::::::,;.:',.::::::;>:,:,' . :"",'"
.'
~tll;'" .,' '~~,~ri~i:M""'';' witc ;.~~.. ~hulh ....~~pi;~~"i;~~:~> . ' ,ii
;~tU::<: . . ~~'~.~cal8ns of rtaoN ~.~~~tQB' ~d:~~ Q.::}J.~.MatOl.~g~~r;~~;~~;~{~~~.',,1';::. . . ,',:,~,:'::
~:::\::.,:,'.: . ~"""Jh:p,~~tion and'c~.new':'r~I1~.Ofl'vl~:f) 104'~:C~ fo~ dr.awUij.an4:~p~;;too~~) :.~,,,); .' ,','
f:i::::' .:~. "~~ll~~k~ prolo.type.: .'.,::,):'" :.: .'.::.. "'::n:::- . <i:: '. .:{. .,: '. .'-:.:,.;~,:,::'.~.::;;,:,:. '.::::;'-: ::::::.>Ai:i('::.' :.i::,;:';: ;(: t.:::..' ::)
~;'i:::~~=~~$~p.~.:;,:~~~~~Lw~ );~
n(, .. .. ~lQt.::'(:"f?:' . '. .:.,'....." . .' .'::,:::njr.::,. .:,: :i:::,:";, .,': :<'i\:.-.,'::::.,.::{;:i:::..:...... ....,>>;-:,;.-.,. .. ',;"
H:<..:..: " . . '.:' . . ',:':';' ':y';:::i ;:::. '. -:.: :'. : :. ':". '.::'.":: :.; .' . . .':. : '.:' /;::;:'-::. . ,:,::,,'(/:\;j:H ):c::::)':::::;-:::i.\LU.\lJiY~;;:i:;};(i:,':":'~:;?::\',l~:r::
". :'f\,.!,
\ttn ..... ::...... ::. ; 'l983:,~::t~;,.SUNct Martutac~;'~t~:Joieph;:M_~ota; ~biiJtJ~'ijjSbippJq/'::t~q*~#r.:!~y ".,\.1:'1:.' ,'ff!,!'-
.;>!> ..' ." .llDcr' Wbiicq1~t'IOoa1.ly ope~ag ,$e~q~lC~i11otY:~.. H~l ~~~:~ :ffi~~vJ.Ul:gptra1l~~~:~~~ijl(l,bl~~::::II:: .if;;;;:
:~'~i:-i' .' f(iir UlO de&~ and.consuuctlon.of~~.: ..:.. ..- . ". ".:..>;,::11': .' ...:(>;:: ,.,,' ;'T."::<'::-';";\i"::' ::.:-,:'.' ill'-""a"":'i'::::U;; ,<>
:',!::::.. _' >-,'. ,',<7 .. '.' .. ..: :7:' .... '.. -:>j'.':.~..: ...:',;:';:', ': .>::::". :,):/:::)::;::<~i<n~>:::\;'''i <.: .,'::'H':' i'::<
, :'.:'", .,.' ':'..,:;: . " .... ,.".,.:. . ,"'.:: ',:.: ..:: ::.: .:;,:,:::.,;:::::",.:::h:.::,::i::::..,',:;..... '. ,",,,,
,:../ ,;:): . '. '''', . . . '.::" :'. ":"':::'. :': .: . : .::::{';:;.;n.... .:.:': ':H: ..\,::: .::., ;:':):.:: .:.;::iiX::~::::;,~:>:.:,,'<;:; . ,',.,- . ::{,i:
i~JL:;::i'. ::. .", '.' ,,' ..' ',-:":. :. .;... .: .>-::.. ..:.::...... : . . : . ,;:r.'):~~"'. '. '. .:~: .. ..... .:L i .:....'.!! <:'I'iiu:..(:::~:;:i::<:U:.';';~' ',' ,,;\::....'.:}il:;'i:(i1j;:
::\,!; ~il~ n,~u
;;";:''-':':.L.- , . .i::: '... ':.:. .'.,",,.' .. ":'::"., }..:.:,.;i.:,:::.:,::.:'~..:...::..'..I.::;\:::I.....\"..1 "'(l\~:q~
?:W';;::';,:":lf'1'~"-:'~1 ., ". 'II\""Y:~~' <:" ',' ..: :....::.. ." . :;:.:.:~.:..:~....' .. .:. ',. \', >. ~:':-\,~ ":::"': .<;-..::....}:.~.,~~t:,.;::f)i;;.~~~~I:,1 'I,. I:. ,i
'r/i{:';' ;:")'l' " ,'" li"I'" , ."i:',' ;"': '. '::': '...' ':::.'. ." .:.:,:,:.;.:..,~'.,.. . ,; ,.:>'\'>::' ::<}:iU(~-:::~t.".~;;;:;,.i:")::':'.'\'i: ' ':~;/;'
~(;{,:.::. ,:.-;. -'::" ',.::- :,'.."', .. ....:": :.:::-;. . :~. '. .. . i,' :..',;;::):~" . .'. '::': :::.(.:' -';11I' ". ":: <".";'/::<':' '.'" ..:.' .'. '-:iH
,\:<>: : .' ".: . ""., ::. .;,-. ,:' :i" ::;*r;u"!,~~, :. ,..:;:: ::.:i:' ".i:.'" :,..'~~: ,.... " .' ,,:;:;
;'i','."""'" .,!. . . ." . "'t'.::'" .'i.. "'''''''' " .. '
;;;;;';::;.:: . ." .,,~.-;.;'. '.:. :.:: ".,.:....: . :. .::. ,):,;':'j:;." ":::/" "",.:,;:Jt/.J:' :. ;'''/''';;:/' .,.::' ...... :~";':.: .. 'i;:,
~;;.::...... .. '...:ii'" ::. .. . . 'I :':: '" "'::" . .... " .: ,,:,.: .:..:. "'. "'11""":' :... :iti,\
;1:":" " . , '. ..:y .::.'" ..:;:., . . ..".,., ,"'. .. . ., ;',' . .'" :~r:" ... ., ':.,::.::i,,<::~',,::.;.,::.:'.:::'i:;.:.">. ;;;';.".... ", ' " ,1,.1
~I~;/:::':~>:.);L:; > ".;i;. .,: ;'. :: . :: '-:}':'.:':-- ".:.... .:tk;>".... ....::~.::(;...'t:{jy::.:::.::":H.:::i'):><?::.:>?\':')~;.:::}:..). "'" ,;;;;:/ ';,;:0::;'
;;"::. .::"i". ..,: ..... . .. . .. .::....'., . :.....,.:.... ....;,.:::'::,4::::/\\::/,."::,;':..:.,.. ")it:.
1:"
J~
','
,-~, I
,,'.'i
~ '
~~;~
:}'.
"
r ~',
:,::,,-':'
,,'
,,:Si~}~
;,;;.,',;).
,:;':i}
,,::'>
GME CONSUL ANTS, INC.
BRETT S. , E.I.T.
Materials Technicia /Field Engineer
EDUCATION
Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering
University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, 1995
CERTIF1CA TION
MnJDOT ~ ACl, Grade l, Concrete Field Testing
ACl, Level II ID #967526
Campbell-Pacific Nuclear Meter Certification
lCBO Reinforced Concrete Inspector
Floor flatness/levelness certified (Dipstick Pro filer)
Engineer in Training, 1995, North Dakota
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
Member - The Order of the Engineer
Member - American Society of Civil Engineers
EXPERIENCE
1996 - Present: Materials Technician, GME Consultan ,Inc., Minneapolis. Minnesota
Duties include observation and testing of earthwork for a artment complexes, and commercial and industrial
developments. Observation and testing of concrete and b tuminous pavement. Experienced in interpretation of
drawings and specifications, soil classification, 'rebar obs rvation, and bituminous pavement testing.
1994 - 1995: Civil Engineering Trmnee, North Dakota epartment of Transportation, Grand Forks, North Dakota. '
Duties included supervising the operation of a field testin laboratory, performed soil tests (gradations and Proctors),
performed field tests (compaction and concrete), batched oncrete at various plants, assisted the survey crew,
inspected construction crews (crushing, milling, concrete ipe installation and electrical conduit installation).
1993: Truss builder, Grand Forks Truss, Grand Forks, orth Dakota. Assisted in jigging and building roof and
floor truss systems.
1992: Construction Laborer, Ulland Brothers Constructi n, Carlton, Minnesota. Operated heavy equipment (roller
and front~end loader), and performed general labor duties (flagging and clean up).
GF-,
.
.
.
FEE SCHEDULE continued
T-18
T-19
T-20
T-21
NOTES
GME CONSULTANTS, INC.
Monticel 0 Community and Training Center Project
Monticello, Minnesota
Bituminous Coring Charges
(includes time, transportat'on and equipment
charges)
Bituminous Core Density and Thickness Measurement
Extraction and Gradation Te ting of
bituminous mixture
a. Extraction Test
b. Extraction/Gradation Test
Laboratory Marshall Density Test for
bituminous paving mixture
$ 16.00/core
$ 15.00/core
$ 95.00jtest
$135.00/test
$ 95.00/sample
1. The unit prices and estimate of charges in this proposal will be
effective through December 3 , 1999. Beyond this date they will
be subject to review and revision.
2 .
3.
The unit prices for additi
supplied upon request.
not listed above will be
Testing requested in s of 40 hours per week, or on
Saturdays, Sundays, or legal holidays will be billed at 1.5 times
the unit rates given above.
4. In the event of injuries to GME personnel because of hazardous
materials or environmental c nditions on the site, the applicable
unit rates will be charged d ring all first aid and evacuation.
5. Subcontract services authori ed by client will be charged at cost
plus 15%.
GF-JO
GME CONSU TANTS, INC.
GENERAL CONDITIONS FOR C NSTRUCTION FIELD SERVICES
AND MATERIAL TESTING
Section 1- Scope of Work
a. GME Consultants, Inc. (hereafter called GME), shall perfo m the professional services defined in this Agreement and shall
invoice the Client for those services at the standard rates s own on the attached FEE SCHEDULES. The estimated cost, if
provided to the Client and if stated as an estimate in this A reement, shall not be considered as a firm figure, but only as
an estimate unless specifically stated otherwise In this a reement.
b. GME shall provide additional services under this Agreemen as requested by the Client and shall invoice the Client for these
additional services at the stated rates. It is understood th t the scope of work defined in this Agreement is based on the
information provided by the Client. If this information is incomplete or inaccurate, or if unexpected site conditions are discovered,
or if additional services are required, the scope of work m y change, even as the work is in progress. GME shall make a
reasonable effort to contact the Client when a change in the s ope of work appears necessary, and the Client, by agreeing to the
change, also recognizes that the estimate of cost or contract gure may also change.
c. The Client refers to the person/persons who signs/sign and accepts our contract, or the company or organization on whose
behalf the contract is signed, or the heirs, assigns, subsidiarie ,partners, or successor firm or firms of the signing party.
Section 2 - Construction Field Services and Material Testing
a.
Construction Field Services/Material Testing furnished by G E to the Client on a project will be defined as the taking of soil
and/or material tests at various locations on the job site. and t e making of visual observations relating to earthwork, foundations,
and/or materials as specifically requested by the Client, a d agreed to by GME, and will be limited to those specifically
designated services. Such services will be performed by G E using that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised, under
similar circumstances, by reputable members of the professio practicing in this or similar localities:
The presence of GME field personnel will be for the purp se of providing the Client with a professional service based on
observations and testing of the work of a contractor, subcontr ctor, or other materialmen, as specifically requested by the Client.
GME field personnel will look for general conformance ith the specifications, plans and/or soil report of the project.
Discrepancies noted by GME field personnel will be referred to the Client, or the Client's representative as designated prior to
GME's involvement in the project. .
It is understood by the Client that the observation and testing of soils and/or materials by GME will in no way imply a guarantee
or warranty of the work of the contractor, subcontractor or ot er materialmen, and the services rendered by GME will in no way
excuse such contractor, subcontractor or other materialme from liability in the event of subsequently discovered defects,
omissions, errors, or other deficiencies in their work. The p esence or absence of GME on the project site will not affect any
obligation of any contractor, subcontractor or other materia 1m n to perform in accordance with the specifications and plan of the
project. The Client further understands that GME is not a qu lity assurance representative for any contractor, subcontractor or
other materialmen on the project.
The services of GME engineers and field personnel do not include responsibility for the superintendence of the construction
process or direction of the actual work of the contractor, subcontractor or other materialmen. It is understood by the
ClienUOwner, Architect, and Civil/Structural Engineer that the contractors/subcontractor's methods of excavation and earthwork
are solely his responsibility with regard to stability and pr tecting personnel and adjacent structure. GME will accept no
responsibility for evaluating or appraising said methods. It is urther agreed that GME is not responsible for, nor is to review, the
adequacy of job safety on the project.
The Client agrees to supply GME with specifications, plans a d other necessary material of the project pertinent to providing its
services.
Due to the nature of observing and field testing the work of contractors, subcontractors or materialmen on the project, GME
cannot be responsible for the schedule or length of time it field personnel remain on the job site. The time GME's field
personnel spend on the job site is dependent upon the schedu e of the contractor, subcontractor or materialmen whose work they
are observing and/or testing. Client agrees that any delays, ncellations, rescheduling, overtime or other construction activities
that may after the anticipated number of hours and the anticip ted costs of GME on the job site, and that are beyond the control
of GME field personnel, are legitimate and chargeable time an will be invoiced at the rates designated in the fee schedules.
Part-time work is defined as Construction Field Services provi ed by GME where its field personnel are on the job site less than
five (5) working days per week or less then forty (40) hours p r week, or both. It is agreed that the Client will furnish GME with a
minimum of one working day's notice, or twenty-four (24) hou s notice, whichever is greater, on any part-time job of GME if field
personnel are requested. GME shall make reasonable effort to provide field personnel on all projects, but reserves the right to
schedule its field personnel as it deems appropriate, includin the scheduling of different field personnel from day to day on any
given part-time project. The Client agrees to inform GME of th anticipated services required of GME field personnel on any day,
including but not restricted to the kind and number of tests to be required and the anticipated amount of time the field personnel
will be required on the job site.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
g.
SF--I J
GME CONSUl: NTS, INC.
GME CONSULTANTS, INC.
GENERAL CONDITIONS FOR C NSTRUCTION FIELD SERVICES
AND MATERIAL T STING (Continued)
Section 3 - Reports and Ownership of Documents
a. GME shall furnish three (3) copies of each report to the Clien. The Client agrees to pay for additional copies at the rate specified
in the FEE SCHEDULE.
b. Reports, plans and other work prepared by GME will remain he property of GME until all fees for GME's services have been paid
in full. The Client agrees that all reports and other work fur ished to the Client and its agents not paid for in full will be returned
upon demand and will not be used for licensing, permits, de ign and/or construction. With the exception of technical reports, all
documents, including original boring logs, field data, field no es, laboratory test data, calculations and estimates are and remain
the property of GME.
Section 4 - Invoices
a. Invoices will be submitted once a month for services perform d during the prior month. Payment is due upon presentation and is
past due after thirty (30) days of receipt of the invoice, unles specifically arranged otherwise in writing. The Client shall provide
GME with a clear written statement within fifteen (15) days after the invoice date of any questions with respect to the invoice.
Failure to provide GME with a clear written statement wit in fifteen (15) days shall constitute acceptance of an invoice as
submitted. The Client agrees to pay a finance charge of one and one-half percent (1%%) per month (18%) annually on past due
accounts. The billing rates as described in the Agreemen will be increased on the anniversary of the effective date of this
agreement.
b. The Client's obligation to pay for the work contracted is in n way dependent upon the Client's ability to obtain financing, zoning,
approval of governmental or regulatory agencies, final adjudi ation of a lawsuit in which GME is not involved, or upon the Client's
successful completion of the project. It is agreed that all exp nses incurred by GME in liening or collecting a delinquent amount,
including but not limited to reasonable attorneys' fees, finan ial charges, witness personnel,document duplication, organization
and storage costs,court costs, travel and subsistence, shall e paid to GME by the Client in additional to the delinquent amount.
Section 5 - Warranty and Limitation of Professional Liability
a. The only warranty.or-guaranteemade by GME'in connection with services performed under this Agreement is that such services
are performed with the care and skill ordinarily exercised by reputable members of the profession practicing under similar
conditions at the same time in the same or a similar locality No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made or intended by
rendition of consulting services or by furnishing oral or writte reports of the findings made.
b. Any exploration, testing, surveys, and analysis associated ith the work will be performed by GME for the Client's sole use to
fulfill the purpose of this Agreement and GME is not respon ible for interpretation by others of the information developed. The
Client recognizes that subsurface conditions beneath the p oject site may vary from those encountered in borings, surveys or
exploration and that information and recommendations devel ped by GME are based solely on the information available.
c. It is agreed that the Client will limit any and all liability, claim or damage cost of defense, or expenses to be levied against GME
on account of design defects, breach of contract, errors, omissions, or professional negligence to a sum not to exceed
$50,000.00 or the amount of GME's fee, whichever is gr ater. Our limits of liability can be increased to a maximum of
$1,000,000.00 for an additional fee equal to 10% of the tot I GME Field Services contract value. This additional fee would be
billed in a lump sum at the end of the project.
d. The Client further agrees to notify any contractor or subcontr ctor who may perform work in connection with any design, report or
study prepared by GME of such limitations of Professional iability for design defects, breach of contract, errors, omissions, or
professional negligence and require as a condition precede t to their performing their work, a like limitation of liability on their
part as against GME. .
e. Under no circumstances shall GME be liable for extra costs r other consequences due to changed conditions or for cost related
to the failure of the contractor or materialmen to install work i accordance with the plans and specifications.
Section 6 - Public Liability Insurance
GME represents and warrants that it and its agents, staff, a d consultants employed by it, is and are protected by Workmen's
Compensation Insurance and that GME has such coverage nder Public Liability and Property Damage Insurance pOlicies which
GME deems to be adequate. GME shall furnish certificates of insurance upon request. Within the limits and conditions of the
insurance, GME agrees to indemnify and hold the Client harmless from and against bodily injury and property damage arising
directly from any negligent acts by GME, its employees, gents, staff, and consultants employed by it. GME shall not be
responsible for bodily injury and property damage arising from negligent acts by the Client, its employees agents, staff,
consultants, or subcontractors employed by it. The Client a rees to limit the liability of GME to the limits of GME's insurance. It
is understood that the problems of insurance rest with the lient and not with GME. The Client is responsible for requesting
specific inclusions that are not covered in GME's insurance.
GME CONSU :rANTS, INC.
GME CONSU TANTS, INC.
GENERAL CONDITIONS FOR C NSTRUCTION FIELD SERVICES
AND MATERIAL T STING (Continued)
Section 7 - Termination
This Agreement may be terminated by either party upon at I ast seven (7) days written notice in the event of substantial failure
by the other party to perform in accordance with the terms ereof through no fault of the terminating party. Such termination
shall not be effective if that substantial failure has been reme ied before expiration of the period specified in the written notice. If
this Agreement is terminated, GME shall be paid for services erformed to the termination notice date plus termination expenses.
Termination expenses shall include personnel and equipmen rescheduling and reassignment adjustments and all other related
costs incurred directly attributable to termination.
Section 8 - Indemnification From Hazardous Waste
For the services involving or relating to hazardous waste ele ents of this Agreement, it is further agreed that the Owner shall
indemnify and hold harmless GME Consultants, Inc. and it agents, and employees from and against all claims, damages,
losses, and expense, direct and indirect, or consequential da ages, including but not limited to fees and charges or attorneys
and court and arbitration costs, arising out of or resulting fr m the performance of the work by GME or claims against GME
arising from the work of others, related to hazardous waste.
The above indemnification provision extends to claims again t GME Consultants, Inc. which arise out of, are related to, or are
based upon, the dispersal, escape, release or saturation of sake, vapors, soot, fumes, acids, alkalis, toxic chemicals, liquids,
gases, or any other material, irritant, contaminant or pollutant In or into the atmosphere, or on, onto, upon, or into the surface or
subsurface (a) soil, (b) water or watercourses, (c) objects, or ( ) any tangible or intangible matter, whether sudden or not.
Section 9 - Asbestos Indemnification Clause ,','"
For services involving or relating to the study, testing, remo ai, or encapsulation of asbestos as part of this Agreement, it is
agreed that the Owner shall indemnify and hold harmless GM and its consultants, agents, and employees from and against all
claims, damages; losses and expenses,' direct and indirect, r consequential damages, including but' not limited to fees and
charges of attorneys and court and arbitration costs, arising ut of or resulting from the performance of the work by GME, or
claims against GME arising from the work of others, related t asbestos activities. If any Contractor during the course of work
observes the existence of asbestos in the structure or building, the Contractor shall promptly notify Owner and GME. The Owner
shall consult with GME regarding removal or encapsulation 0 the asbestos material and Contractor shall not perform any work
pertinent to the asbestos material prior to receipt of ~pecial ins ructions from Owner.
Section 10 - Lien Rights
GME hereby gives notice that it retains the right to submit a lien against the subject property in the event of non.payment of
invoices. The lien will be prepared and filed in accordance wit pertinent laws of the state.
Section 12 - Tax on Services
Section 11 - GME Consultants, Inc. is an equal opportunity em layer.
The amount of any excise, VAT, or gross receipts tax (10 I, state, or federal) that may be imposed subsequent to the
acceptance of this contract shall be added to the billings for t is prOject. The Client agrees that the amount of the tax shall be
additional compensation to the actual billings for services, and hat he shall pay the full amount of billings plus tax.
~-/3
GME CONSUL't NTS,INC.
GME CONSUL ANTS, INC.
STEVEN J. RU SINK, P.E.
Project En 'neer
Field Services Assi tant Manager
EDUCATION
Bachelor of Civil Engineering
University of Wisconsin - Platteville, 1983
REGISTRATION
Civil Engineer - State of Minnesota, 1988
Civil Engineer. State of Wisconsin, 1988
CERTIFICATIONS
Qualified Masonry Inspector
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
Member - American Society of Civil Engineers
EXPERIENCE
1991 . Present: Project Engineer/Coordinator 9f Field ervices, GME Consultants, Inc., Minneapolis,
Minnesota. Duties include supervision of GME personn 1 for field testing. Make site visits, review project
status, and recommend appropriate testing and observati n procedures. Review all test data and field
observations prior to preparation of progress reports. PI' pare progress reports and invoices for various
projects. Implement training and safety programs for G E field testing personnel.
1989 - 1991: Civil Engineer, Rieke Carroll Muller & A sociates, Inc., Minnetonka, Minnesota. Duties
included representing the City of Belle Plaine, Minnesot , as an on-site representative during construction
of the Belle Plaine Wastewater Treatment Facility's impr vements. Reviewed shop drawings and prepared
change orders for various RCM projects.
1984 - 1989: Civil Engineer, Twin City Testing Corpor tion, St. Paul, Minnesota. Duties included performing
observation and testing of excavations and foundation b es for numerous construction projects throughout the
Minneapolis/St. Paul Metro Area. Performed monitorin of tied-back wall anchors, and proof and performance
testing. Performed deep foundation (caissons, piling) ob ervation and testing. Performed vibration monitoring
during construction demolition/pile driving using a seis ograph. Field Engineer for testing services for the
Minneapolis Convention Center.
1981 - 1984: Soils Technician, Twin City Testing Corp ration, St. Paul, Minnesota. Performed routine field and
laboratory testing of soils for numerous construction pro ects in the Minneapolis/St. Paul Metro Area. Services
performed on internship with Twin City Testing on part. ime basis during college.
SF--I ~
GME CONSUL ANTS, INC.
DENNIS S lIMITZ
Certified Welding Inspector/S nior Materials Technician
EDUCATION
Associate Degree in Nondestructive Testing,
Hutchinson, Minnesota, Vocational Technical I stitute, 1975
CERTIFlCATIONS
Radiation and Use of Nuclear Soil Gauges
American Society of Non-destructive Testing, Level II Dr, Radiography
A WS Certified Welding Inspector
American Concrete Institute Certified Concrete Technic an, Grade II
National Institute for Certification in Engineering, Soil and Asphalt
OSHA 40-hour Health and safety Training
Structural Masonry "Special Inspectors" Certification Curse (with written examination, presented at GME by
Wakefield Associates in June, 1988, 1992, and 1996).
EXPERIENCE
1985 - Present: Senior Materials Technician, GME C nsultants, Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota. Duties
include inspections of steel, concrete, and soil commer ial, highrise, and industrial buildings. Duties
include concrete testing, monitoring excavations, and fi I placement for commercial and residential
developments, inspection and testing of shop and field tructural steel, and "Special Inspection" for
structural masonry and reinforcement. Testing of soils sing a nuclear soil gauge.
1983 - 1985: Operations Manager, Conam Inspection,
supervision of nondestructive testing personnel and pe
fabrications and Certified Level II in radiography, ultr
Welding Inspector.
inneapolis, Minnesota. Duties included
rmed visual inspections on various steel
onics, magnetic testing, and A WS Certified
1978 - 1982: Field QA Manager, Assistant RSO, AW Certified Welding Inspector, Pittsburgh-Des Moines
Corporation. Duties included testing in radiography, u trasonics, magnetic particle, liquid penetrant, and leak
testing; certifying welders and monitoring welding ope tions.
1975 - 1977: Certified Level II NDT Inspector, Metils, Inc., Houston, Texas. Duties included testing in
ultrasonics, radiography, magnetic particle testing for h goose structures, power plants, off-shore buildings, bridges,
off-shore drilling rigs, fossil fuel plants, and fabricatio plants.
~F..IS-
.
.
.
""?'1 .~.-, A.~ 1 ~]"'"
-.S) ,j'~i ~,;:<~ '"LJ .l \~
li'fTERTEC
Braun Intertee CorporCltion
1520 24th Avenue North
P.O. Box 189
Sf. Cloud, Minnesota 56302-01 89
320.253-9940 Fax: 253.3054
Engineers and Scientists Serving
In", Built and Nalural Environments'
December 3, 1998
Proposal BDXX -98~ 1342
Mr. Jim Rothstein
Donlar Corporation
P.O. Box 1474
St. Cloud, MN 56302
Dear Jim:
Re: Proposal for Construction Materials Testin~ Services, Proposed Monticello
Community Center, Monticello, Minnesota
As requested, Braun Intertec Corporation is pleasec to furnish this proposal for providing
construction materials testing services. These servi es will be provided for the proposed
Monticello Community Center.
Proposed Scope of Services
Soils. During excavation of the proposed building ;m engineering technician will perform
observations of the soil conditions. Shallow hand luger borings will be perfonned to
determine localized subsurface soil conditions in th excavation bottoms, and will be used to
judge the suitability of the exposed soils for structu al support.
During placement of compacted fill and backfill, ar engineering technician will perform soil
compaction tests to document that these soils are b( iog placed and compacted per project
specifications.
Estimated
Description Quantity Unit Rate Extension
Engineering Technician 80 hours $35.00 $2,800.00
Trip Charge (vehicle and mileage) 20 trips 30.00 600.00
Standard Proctor 3 tests 90.00 270.00
Subtotal $3,670.00
CF,JI.
Donlar Corporation
Proposal BDXX-98-1342
December 3, 1998
Page 2
.
Reinforcing Steel Observations. Prior to the eng neering technician performing concrete
testing services, the technician will perform observations of the reinforcing steel for footings.
These observations will be conducted by an engine ~ring technician experienced in reinforcing
steel observations. Our personnel will document t at the following items are in substantial
compliance with current shop and structural drawi gs.
Correct number, size and spacing of bars i provided.
Proper concrete cover is provided.
Reinforcing steel is free of rust, scale, dirt ice or items which would reduce adhesion
with the concrete.
Dimensions of the formwork.
Condition of the formwork.
Braun Jntertec does not perform surveying service. Therefore, we will not be responsible
for the location of the formwork. Our reinforcing steel observations will be based on the
formwork locations as placed by the contractor.
.
Concrete. During placement of concrete at the pr 1ect site, an engineering technician will be
provided to monitor the properties of the plastic cc ncrete. Procedures include measuring the
slump and air content, temperature and casting cyl nders. The cylinders will be returned to
our laboratory for moist curing and compressive s rength testing. A set will consist of four
cylinders, two of which will be tested for compres ive strength at 7-days and two at 28-days.
Estimated
Description Quantity Unit Extension
Rate
Engineering Technician 150 hours* $35.00 $5,250.00
Trip Charge (vehicle and mileage) 60 trips 30.00 1,800.00
Curing and Testing of Concrete Cylinders (set 0 4) 60 sets 40.00 2,400.00
Subtotal $9,050.00
* We assume that 60 concrete pours will be needd to complete the project.
Masonry. The project specifications require the nasonry contractor to cast block prisms at a
rate of 1 test per 5,000 square feet of walls. A se will consist of three prisms, one will be
tested for compressive strength at 7 days and two at 28 days. In addition, we propose to have
an engineering technician cast grout cubes and mortar cylinders per the project specifications.
Compressive strength, absorption and freeze thaw tests will be conducted on the cast stone.
Special inspections will be completed on the steel placement in the masonry walls prior to
. grouting. We assume that 15 trips will be needed to complete our special inspections.
~F...I'"
.
.
.
Donlar Corporation
Proposal BDXX-98-1342
December 3, 1998
Page 3
Estimated
Description Quantity Unit Rate Extension
Engineering Assistant (special inspections) 60 hours $50.00 $3,000.00
Engineering Technician 42 hours 35.00 1,470.00
Trip Charge (vehicle and mileage) 27 trips 30.00 810.00
Curing and Testing of Grout Cubes 7 sets 120.00 840.00
Curing and Testing of Mortar Cylinders 7 sets 42.00 294.00
Cast Stone (compressive strength & absorption) 1 tes t 225.00 225.00
Cast Stone (freeze thaw) 1 test 562.00 562.00
Masonry Block Prisms 7 sets 350.00 2,450.00
Subtotal $9,651.00
Bituminous. Braun Intertec will provide a certifi d bituminous technician on site during
portions of the paving to collect samples of the h( t-mix asphaltic~pavement. Samples will be
returned to our laboratory for testing. Samples Vi ill be collected according to ASTM
procedures and project schedules. Testing will in lude marshall voids and thickness and
density of pavement cores.
E! timated
Description <; uantity Unit Rate Extension
Certified Bituminous Technician 15 hours $55.00 $825.00
Trip Charge (vehicle & mileage) 3 trips 30.00 90.00
V oids/Triple Marshall 8 tests 121.00 968.00
Thickness & Density 14 tests 31. 00 434.00
Subtotal $2,317.00
Fabrication Observations. It is our understandi Ig that the fabrication observations will not
be required. The fabricator has not been identifi d at the time of this proposal. We are
assuming the fabricator has been approved by tht local building official or meets the
certification requirements of the project specifica ions.
SF-"
.
.
.
Donlar Corporation
Proposal BDXX-98-1342
December 3, 1998
Page 4
Field Assembly (Erection) Observations. Erecti n observations are requested for the
following items.
1. Visually examine all field welds for size, ength and configuration in accordance with
the American Welding Society (A WS) publicati n D 1.1 1998 edition.
2. Nondestructively examine the field welds s follows:
a. Ultrasonically examine all full penetrati n welds exceeding 5/16 inch. The
American Welding Society limits the examination to the above mentioned
thickness.
3. Bolting Observations will consist of the f !lowing:
a. If tension control bolts are used we will 0 serve the following conditions:
1) The tip of the bolt has separated from the body of the bolt, this usually
indicates that the bolt has been properl tensioned.
2) Observe the installation/tensioning pro edures of the erector for compliance with
the manufacturers recommended install tion practices.
3) Observe the tensioned connections to nsure that all plies of the connection are in
contact and that there appear to be no lose bolts.
b. If standard high strength bolting materials are used we will perform random torque
examinations on these connections in acco dance with the American Institute of Steel
Construction (AISC).
4. We will perform visual weld examination on the roof deck to supporting structural
members. These examinations will consis of observing the size, location and
placement of the welds. These examinatio s will be evaluated in accordance with
project specifications and the American Widing Society (A WS) Structural Sheet Metal
Code publication 01.3-89. We will also 0 serve the placement of the sidelap fastening
mechanisms in accordance with the project pecifications.
We will require that the General contractor notif us when the following milestones are
reached:
A. Structural steel has been erected bolts are i pacted and field welds completed. Prior
to decking.
B. The roof deck has been installed and welded in-place.
S-F.. J'i
Donlar Corporation
Proposal BDXX-98-1342
December 3, 1998
Page 5
.
Estimated
Description Quantity Unit Rate Extension
NDE Technician 40 hours $55.00 $2,200.00
Trip Charge (vehicle and mileage) 12 trips 40.00 480.00
Summary Engineering Report 1 report 275.00 275.00
Subtotal $2,955.00
Project Management. Intermittent engineering relorts will be issued for the project as the
various tasks are performed. These reports will in lude the results of our engineering and
steel observations, soil compaction testing and combressive strength testing of concrete and
mortar cylinders, grout cubes and masonry prisms. The costs shown below also include
review of our test data, word processing, scheduling and invoice review.
. Description Estimated Unit Rate Extension
Quantity
Review by Professional Engineer 2 hours $75.00 $150.00
Project Manager 5 hours 62.00 310.00
Final Report 1 report 250.00 250.00
Subtotal $710.00
For your convenience, we have estimated the numt er of units necessary to perform each task,
and have projected a total cost for the testing servil es. The time and number of tests
indicated in the preceding tables are estimates base on review of the plans and specifications.
Often, the actual number of tests or amount of tim( required to complete the required tasks
may vary from the estimates due to circumstances eyond our control, such as weather
delays, changes in the contractors schedule or unfo seen conditions. Should it be necessary to
perform additional testing, or if increases in the un t estimates are warranted, you will be
notified. Our services will be provided on an on c 11 basis by you or your site representative.
.
CF-,1-D
.
.
.
Donlar Corporation
Proposal BDXX-98-1342
December 3, 1998
Page 6
Summary of Costs
Soils
$3,670.00
9,050.00
9651. 00
2,317.00
2,955.00
710.00
$28,353.00
Reinforcing Steel Observations/Concrete
Masonry
Bituminous
Steel
Project Management
Total
General Remarks
We appreciate the opportunity to present this prol osed contract to you. It is being presented
in duplicate. If it is acceptable to you, please enc orse one copy and return it to us as written
authorization to proceed. The remaining copy sh uld be kept for your records.
If you have any questions about this proposal, please call us at (320) 253-9940.
s~ 44-
Thomas. L. Henkemeyer
Business Development
~~
Stev;A. T~
Project Engineer
Attachments:
General Conditions
~F..'tl
.
.
.
Donlar Corporation
Proposal BDXX-98-1342
December 3. 1998
Page 7
Please proceed according to the above stated terms:
Authorizer's Name (please print or type)
Authorizer's Signature
Authorizer's Title
Authorizer's Firm
Date
t1h/sal:\pro\98-1342
C'F- 2.~
.
BRAUNsM
I NTE RTEC
Our agreement with you consists of these
General Conditions and the accompanying
written proposal or authorization.
Section 1: Our Responsibilities
1.1 We will provide the professional
services described in our written agree-
ment with you. We will provide you with
written reports containing professional
opinions and recommendations. In
performing our services, we will use that
degree of care and skill ordinarily
exercised under similar circumstances by
reputable members of our profession
practicing in the same locality.
.
1.2 Our work will be conducted using
appropriate procedures and protocols. If
you direct us to deviate from our recom-
mended procedures, you agree to hold us
harmless from all claims, damages, and
expenses arising out of your direction.
1.3 There is an inherent risk that samples
or observations may not be representative
of things not sampled or seen and, further,
that conditions may change over time. We
will reference our field observations and
sampling to available reference points. We
will not survey, set, or check the accuracy
of those points unless we accept that duty
in writing.
1.4 Our duties do not include supervising
your contractors or commenting on,
overseeing, or providing the means and
methods of their work, unless we accept
those duties in writing. We will not be
responsible for the failure of your
contractors to perform in accordance with
their undertakings, and the providing of
our services will not relieve others of their
responsibilities to you or to others.
.
1.5 We will provide a health and safety
program for our employees, but we will
not be responsible for contractor, job, or
site health or safety unless we accept that
duty in writing.
General Conditions
Section 2: Your Res nsibilities
2.1 You will provide ccess to the site. We
will use reasonable c to minimize
damage to the site. In the course of our
work some site dama e is normal even
when due care .is exe ised. We have not
included the cost of r storation of normal
damage in the estimat d charges. At your
option and expense, e will correct
normal damage. We a ree to be respon-
sible for damage that s caused by our
negligence.
2.5 Neither this agreement nor the
providing of services will operate to make
us an owner, operator, generator, trans-
porter, treater, storer, or a disposal facility
within the meaning of the Resource
Conservation Recovery Act, as amended,
or within the meaning of any other law
governing the handling, treatment, storage,
or disposal of hazardous materials. You
agree to hold us harmless and indemnify
us from any such claim or loss.
2.6 Drilling, well installation, and
remediation services may involve risk of
cross-contamination of previously
uncontaminated air, soil, and water. If you
are requesting that we provide services
that include this risk, you agree to hold us
harmless and indemnify us from cross-
contamination claims and damages, unless
the loss is caused by our negligence.
2.2 You agree to pro ide us, in a timely
manner, with the info ation that you
have regarding buried objects located at
the site. Until we hav completed our field
work, you agree to pr vide us with all
your plans, changes i plans, and new
information that refer to site conditions.
You agree to hold us armless from all
claims, damages, loss s, and related
expenses involving b 'ed objects of
which you had knowl dge but did not
timely call to our atte tion or correctly
show on the plans fu ished to us.
2,7 You agree to make disclosures
required by law. In the event you do not
own the site, you acknowledge that it is
your duty to inform the owner of the
discovery or release of contaminants at the
site. You agree to hold us harmless and
indemnify us from all claims related to
disclosures made by us that are required
by law and from all claims related to the
informing or failure to inform the site
owner of the discovery of contaminants.
2.3 You will be respo sible for the
cooperation of your e ployees and your
contractors in observi g all radiation
safety standards after e notify you that
radiographic or gam a ray equipment or
other nuclear testing r measuring devices
are to be employed bus.
Section 3: Reports and Records
3.1 We will furnish reports to you in
duplicate. We will retain analytical data for
seven years and financial data for three
years relating to the services performed.
2.4 You will notify u of any knowledge
or suspicion of the pr sence of hazardous
materials in samples rovided to us. You
will provide us with i formation in your
possession or control elating to contami-
nation at the site. If w observe or suspect
the presence of conta inants not
anticipated in our agr ement, we may
terminate our work w thout liability to you
or others, and we will be paid for the
services we have pro ided.
3.2 All samples remaining after tests are
conducted and field and laboratory
equipment that cannot be adequately
cleansed of contaminants are your
property. They will be discarded or
returned to you, at our discretion, unless
within 15 days of the report date you give
~F~2,1
written direction to store or transfer the
materials, at your expense.
.
3.3 Our reports, notes, calculations, and
other documents are instruments of our
service to you. Our reports are for your
use only for the purposes disclosed to us.
You may not transfer our reports to others
or use them for a purpose for which they
were not prepared without our written
approval, which will not be unreasonably
withheld. At your request, we will provide
endorsements of our reports or letters of
reliance, but only if the recipients agree to
be bound by the terms of our agreement
and only if we are paid the administrative
fee stated in our then current Schedule of
Charges.
3.4 If you do not pay for our services as
agreed, we may retain all reports and work
not yet delivered to you and all reports and
other work in your possession must be
returned to us. Reports and other work
may not be used by you for any purpose
whatsoever until they are paid for in full.
.
Section 4: Compensation
4.1 You will pay for services as agreed
upon or according to our then current
Schedule of Charges if there is no other
written agreement as to price. An
estimated cost is not a firm figure unless
stated as such.
4.2 You will notify us of billing disputes
within 15 days. You will pay all undis-
puted portions of invoices on receipt. You
agree to pay interest on unpaid balances
beginning 30 days after invoice dates at
the rate of 1.5% per month. but not to
exceed the maximum rate allowed by law.
4.3 If you direct us to invoice another, we
will do so, but you agree to be responsible
for our compensation unless you provide
us with that person's written acceptance of
all terms of our agreement and we extend
credit.
4.4 You agree to compensate us for our
reasonable fees and expenses if we are
required to respond to legal process arising
out of a proceeding a~ to which we are not
a party.
.
4.5 If we are delayed by factors beyond
our control, or if project conditions or the
scope or amount of work change, or if the
standards or methods change, we will give
you timely notice and we will receive an
equitable adjustment of our compensation.
Section 5: Dispufes,
Damage and Risk Alloc tion
5.1 Disputes will be sub itted to
Alternative Dispute Resol tion (ADR) as a
condition precedent to liti ation. Each of
us will exercise good fait efforts to
resolve disputes through a mutually
acceptable ADR procedur . Collections
will not be submitted to R. All disputes
will be governed by the la of the state in
which our servicing office is located.
5.2 We will not be liable or special,
incidental, consequential, r punitive
damages, including but no limited to
those arising from delay, I ss of use, loss
of profits or revenue, loss f financing
commitments or fees, or t e cost of
capital.
5.3 We will not be liable or damages
unless suit is commenced ithin two years
of the date of injury or los or within two
years of the date of the co pletion of our
services, whichever is earl er. We will not
be liable unless you have otified us of the
discovery of the claimed b each of
contract, negligent act, or omission within
30 days of the date of disc very and unless
you have given us an opp unity to
investigate and to reco nd ways of
mitigating damages.
5.4 For you to obtain the nefit of a fee
which includes a reasonab e allowance for
risks, you agree that our a gregate liability
will not exceed the fee pai for our
services or $50,000, whic ever is greater,
and you agree to indemnif us from all
liability to others in exces of that amount.
If you are unwilling to ace pt this
allocation of risk, we will ncrease our
aggregate liability to $100 000 provided
that, within 10 days of the ate of this
agreement, you provide pa ment in an
amount which will increas our fees by
10%, but not less than $5 ,to compen-
sate us for the greater risk ndertaken.
This increased fee is not t e purchase of
insurance. Your check sho Id be forwarded
to the Law Department at .0. Box 39108,
Minneapolis, MN 55439-0108, and refer
to our proposal or project umber.
5.5 If you fail to pay us w thin 60 days
following invoice date, we may consider
the default a total breach 0 our agreement
and, at our option, termina e all of our
duties without liability to ou or to others.
5.6 If we are involved in legal action to
collect our compensation, you agree to pay
our collection expenses, including
reasonable attorney fees. If you make a
claim against us that is resolved in our
favor, you will reimburse our costs of
defense, including but not limited to
reasonable attorney and expert witness
fees.
Section 6: Genera/Indemnification
6,1 We will indemnify and hold you
harmless from and against demands,
damages, and expenses caused by our
negligent acts and omissions, and breach
of contract and those acts, omissions, and
breaches of persons for whom we are
legally responsible. You will indemnify
and hold us harmless from and against
demands, damages, and expenses caused
by your negligent acts and omissions, and
breach of contract and those acts,
omissions, and breaches of persons for
whom you are legally responsible.
6,2 To the extent that may be necessary to
indemnify either of us under Section 6.1.
you and we expressly waive, in favor of
the other only, any immunity or exemption
from liability that exists under any worker
compensation law.
Section 7: Misce/laneous Provisions
7,1 We will provide a certificate of
insurance to you upon request.
7.2 This agreement is our entire agree-
ment, and it supersedes a1l prior agree-
ments. It may be modified only in writing
making specific reference to the provision
modified.
7.3 Neither of us will assign this
agreement without the written approval of
the other, but we may subcontract work as
we deem necessary.
7.4 This agreement may be terminated by
a writing. We will receive an equitable
adjustment of our compensation.
7.5 It is customary for the consultant that
provides design recommendations to be
retained to provide observation and related
services during construction or remedia-
tion work. If we are not retained to provide
continuing services. you agree to hold us
harmless from all claims, losses, and
expenses arising out of any interpretations,
clarifications, substitutions, or modifica-
tions of our work provided by you or
others.
~F ,1,,*.2196
~~CON-S PAUL
~002
12/09/98 15:51 FAX 612 770 1657
...
.
"..
,~
November 11, 1998
, .
~:-..~ ...."""':, -:"'\ ...,
r ... . I"' ~ ~ .
tl." .:1 ,;
['1~ ~
~ ~~ :L
f, .! ''''' ._..
Mr. Jim Rothstein
Donlar Construction
41 RIverside Drive North East
St. Cloud. Minnesota 56304
Re:
Proposal for Construction Testing Se ices
Monticello Community Center
Monticello, tvllnnesota
Proposal No. 4198264
Dear Mr. Rothstein:
, rerracan
3535 Hoffman Road East
Whllli Bnt Lakli. MlnnliSOla 55110-5376
(612) 770.1500 Fax: (612) 710..1657
Terracon is pleased to provide a proposal for con truction observation and testing services for
the above-referenced project. As you ere aware, erracon provided the geotechnical services
for the project and are familiar with the soil con Itiens. Based upon our conversation, we
understand our services \vill consist of performing leld and laboratory testing of fill and backfill
soils, foundation observation, casting and strength testing of concrete cylinders, masonry and
structural steel inspection. At this time it is not kno n if the services for materials testing will be
secured by your firm or the owner. Work will be pe armed on a part-time, as~needed basis with
scheduling by a representative of your firm.
We propose to provide qualtfied engineers or e gineering technicians to perform the above
described services. A field technician would be a signed to perform field testing during earth
work operations with the scope of service to coli t representative soil samples for laboratory
testing (Proctors) and perform field density tests. Density tests would generally be performed
using a nuclear density gauge, but other metho s may also be used as required by project
specifications or deemed appropriate by Terracon s supervisory personnel. In addition, a field
technician would be assigned to perform sampling f fresh concrete, with the scope of service to
include testing for slump, temperature, air content (when requested) and molding
test specimens.
Services for foundatIon soils observatlon will be p rformed by a field engineer or geotechnical
engineer. Also, some supervisory time will be ra uired for a project engineer to direct the field
technicians, review test results, and prepare test reports In a ~mely manner.
Field test results will be reported to your on-site re resentatlve at the time of testing, and written
reports of the tests performed will be submitted to your attention. We normally request 24-hour
notice for part-time testing and longer for full-Urn work; however, we will make every effort to
accommodate your schedule.
. "
AtI7.Gna . Arlcann$ . COIoradg . ldahcl . nRnoill . IIJWa . Kansas · MInnesota · MISsouri · Mg~F ~,
Nebraska _ Nsvada . Nsw Mpjco . North Dakota. Oklahoma Tennessee. Tuu . UIah . WJl;eooGn 0 tI1 .,~
Quillity Enginll8ring nee 1965 .
12/09/98 15:?2 FAX 612 770 1657
TERRACON-ST PAUL
.
'.
.
Proposal for Construction Testing Services
Monticello, Minnesota
Prcpo5iiill No. 419B264
November 11, 1998
I4I 003
Terracon
We understand that the scope of materials testin has not been completed at this point. When
the scope is determined, we will provide you wit an estimated cost for our services. Fees for
our S8Nices will be in accordance with the attach d unit rate schedule with invoices sent to your
attention. Our invoice will reflect the actual amo nt of hours and number of tests performed on
the job. Our Terms and Conditions are also atta hed for your review and are considered a part
of our contract for services.
If in agreement with the outlined services. please ign and return this proposal letter to our office:
the other copy should be retained for your files.
We look forward to working with you on this pro ect. If you have any questions regarding this
proposal, please contact us.
Sincerely,
TERRACON
~M:
Barry C. Morgan );~
Geotechnical Manager
BCM:jle
n:\prc pcssl\geo tech\SB264.doc
Att.achmer.ts
NOTICE TO ROCEEO
The above proposal and attached Tenns and Co ditions are understood and accepted.
BY:
(Signature)
DATE:
2
(Company)
SF-.1Jo
12/09/98 15:52 FAX 6~2 770 1657 _
TERRACON ST PAUL
Ia1 004
.
Proposal for Consuuetion Testing Services
Monticello. Minnesota
Propo$al No. 4198264
November 11. 1998
Terracon
FEE SCH DULE
Construction Te ting Services
Monticello Com unity Center
Monticello, Innesota
November 1, 1998
PERSONNEL
Item 1 Services of Senior Project Engineer (R ports and Supervision}............. 75.aO/hour
Item 2 Services of Field Engineer (Observatio of Foundation Soils}................ 45.00/hour"
Item 3 Services of Engineering Technician (S iis and Concrete)....................... 30.00/hour-
Item 4 Transportation Charges, Private Car or
Company Vehicle .............. ......... .......... .......... ........................ ............... S25.00/trlp
*
Increase hourly rate by 1.3 for Saturda . Sunday, and holiday work or regular days
before 7 a.m. and after 5 p.m. Rates a e portal to portal.
EQUIPMENT
Item 1 Nuclear Density and Moisture Measurl g
Equipm ent ... n. n... ,........................ ........ ..u............... ...................... ........ $20. aD/day
. CONCRETE
Item 1 Compressive Strength of Cylinder AST C-39
FOB our LaboratolY." .............. ............ ........ .......................................... $12.00/each
Special Capping for Irregular Surface--.................................................... 5.00/each
6" x 12" Cylinder Molds (Single Use}... ... ............................................... No Charge
Item 2 Stripped and Cured Cylinders or Cub I Not Tested.............................. 12.00/each
Item 3 3" X 6" Grout Cylinder and 2" X 2" Mo r Cubes.................................... 12.00/each
Item 4 Masonry Prisms......................... .......... ..... ............................................. 125.00/each
LABORATORY SOIL TESTS
Item 1
Standard Proctor Test (ASTM D..698)
4-inch Mold ... ...... ..__...... ............ .......... ....... ........................................... $ 85.00/test
One..Point Proctor - Standard or Modi ed.........___.................................. 45.00/point
Atterberg Umits Determination............. .................................................. 39.50/test
Sieve Analysis (Washed Over #200 Si ve)............................................. 56.00/test
Item 2
Item 3
Item 4
.
3
~F-1,?
12/09/98 15:52 FAX 612 770 1~57
TERRACON- T PAUL
~005
TERMS AND CO DITIONS
TERRAe N
SECTION 1: SCOPE OF WORK: TERRACON shall perform the seNEceS ellned In the contract and shall invoice the client for those
services at the fee schedule rales. Any cost eslimales stated in this co tract shall not be considered as a firm flgurQ unless other-
wlsQ specifically stated In this contract. If une)(PQcted site conditions are discovered. the scope of work may change even as the
work is in progress. TERRACON will provide these additional sel'lfice at the conlract fee schedule rate.
Rates for work beyond the scope of this contract and not cOllered by t e contract fee scnedule can be provided. TE~RACON. r:an
perform additional work with prior aUlhorization, and will provide confirms Ion of feel>. All costS Incumld because of delay:s In authonzlIlg
the additional work will be billed to lhe ellent.
Fee schedules are valid for one year following the dale of the contra t unlt$S otherwise noted.
Initiation of servioes by TE;f1RACON pursuant to this propoul will in orporate these terms and condltion5.
SECTION 2: ACCESS TO SITES. PERMITS AND APPROVALS: Unless ot erwlse agreed, the client will furnish TERRACON with right-
of-access 10 the site in order to conducl the planned exploration.
While TERRACON will take all reasonable precautions to minimi~e atI damage to tne property. it Is underslood by the client that
In the normal course or work some damage may occur, the restoratio of which is not part of this agreement.
Unless otherwise agreed. the client will secure all necessary approval . permilS. licenses and consents necessary to the perform-
ance of the services hereunder.
SECTION 3: SOIL BORING AND TEST LOCATIONS: The accuracy and prOXimIty of provided survey control will affect lhe accutae)'
of in-situ test location and ele\la\lon determinations. Unless otherwis noted, the accuracy of 16$tlocations and elevations will be
commensurate only with pacing and approximate measurements or es imates. If greater accuracy Is required, the services of a pro-
fessional SUl'lfeyor should be obtained.
The client will furnish TEARACON with a diagram indicating lhe locati n of the site. Boring and test locations may also be indicated
on the diagram. TERRA-CON reserves the right to deviate a reasonable istance from the boring and test locations unless this right
is specifically revoked by the client in writing at the time ttle diagram Is suppllQd. TEORFlACON reserves the right to terminale this
contract If conditions preventing drilling at the specified locations a e encountered which were not made known to TERRACON
prior to the dale of this oontract.
SECTION 4: UTILITIES: In the performance of its work, TERRACON III take all reasonable precautions to ilvoid damage or injury
to sublerranean slructures or utilities.
The client agrees to hold TEAAACON l1armless and Indemnify TERFlAC N for any claims. payments or other liability, Including costs
and attorney Cees, incurred by TERAACON for any damages to subterran an slructures or utllltles which are not called to TERRACON'S
attention and correctly shown on the plans furnished to TERRA-CON
SECTION S: UNANTICIPATED HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: It shall be t e duty of the owner, the client, or their representatIve to ad-
vise TERRACON of any known or suspected hazardous substances whi h are or may be related to the services provided; such hazard-
ous subs!ancGs Include but ari not limited to products, materials, by-p ducts, wastes or samples of the foregoing which TERRACON
may be provided or obtain performIng Its services.or which hazardous substances exist or may e)(ist on or near any premises upon
wnioh work Is to be performed by TEFlRACON employees. agents or subcontractors.
If TERRA-CON obseNes or suspects the existence of unanticipated azardou$ material. during the course of providing services,
TERRACON may at its option terminate further work on the project an notify client of the condition. ServlcQs will be resumed only
after a renegotiation of scope of services and fees- In the event tnat suo renegotiation cannot Occur to tl1e satisfaction of TERRACON,
TERRACON may at its option terminate this contract.
SECTION 6: DISPOSAL OF HAZARDOUS MATri.RIALS AND CONTAM NATED EQUIPMENT: TERRACON does not create, generate
or at al'IY time own or take possession or ownership of or arrange fo transport, disposal or treatment of hazardous materials as
a result of its exploration services. All hazardous materials, includin but not limited to samples, drilling fluidS. decontamination
fluidS, development fluids. 5011 cuttings and tailings, and used dispo able protective gear and equipment, are the property of the
client, and responsibility tor proper transportation and disposal is the client's unless prior contractual arrangements are made. All
laboratory and fIeld equipment thal cannot readily and adequately b cleansed of Its hazardous contaminants shall become the
property and responsibility of the client. The clien! shall purchase all such equipment and It shall be turned over to the client for
proper disposal unless prior alternate contractual arrangements are ade.
SeCTION 7: REPORTS AND INVOICES: TERRACON will furnish tw copies of the repon to the client. Additional copies will be
furnished at the rate spsclfled in the fes schedule. TERAACON will su mit invoices to the client monthly and a final bill upon com-
pletion of services. Payment is due upon presentation of Invoice and i past due thirty (30) days from t"'e invOice date. Client agrees
to pay a finance charge of one and one.half percent (Wild!.) per month but not e:Kceeding the maximum rate allowed by law, on past
due accounts- Client al$o agrees to pay all costs and expenses. Inclu ing reasonable anomey fees incurred by TEFlFlACON relating
to collection procedure5 on overdue BOoounts. Failure of clienlto abld by the provisions of this section will be considered grounds
for termination of tnis agreement by T5RRACON.
SECTION 8: OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS; All reports, boring logs, fie d data, field notes. laboratory lesl dara, calculations, estimates.
and other documents prepared by TERF\ACON as instruments of serv C8, shall remain the property of rERRACON unless there are
other conlractual agr..menls_
SeCTION iii: CONFIDENTIALITY: TERRACON shall hold confidential II business ortechnlcallnformalion obtained from the client
or his affiliates or generated in the performance of sel'lfiees under this greemenland identified in writing by the client as uconfiden-
tial~. TERRACON shall nol disclose such infonnation without the clie t's consent uoept to the extent required for; 1) Performance
of sel'lfices l.I!1der thi& agreement; 2) Compliance with professional or thicsl standards of conduct for preservation of public safety,
l1ealth, and welfare; 3) Compliance with any court order or olher gover mental directive and/or; 4) protection of TERRA-CON against
claIms or liabilities arising from performance of services under this a reement. TERRACON'S obligation hereunder shall not apply
10 information in tne public domain or lawfully acquired on a non-e nfidential basis from others.
SECTION 10: STANDARD OF CARE: Services performed by TERRAC N under this Agreement will be conducted In a manner con-
sistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by memb rs of the profQsslon currently practicing under similar condi-
lil)n! in the same locale. No other warranty. express or Impl1ed, is m de or Intended by the proposal tor consulting services or by
furnishing oral or wrlllen reports 01 the findings made. The client r ognizes that subsurface conditions may vary from those en-
countered at tne loeation where borings, surveys, tests or exploratio s are made by TERRACON atld that the data, interpretations
and recommendations 01 TEFlFlACON are based solely upon the dat available to TERRA-CON_ TE;RAACON will be responsible for
those data, interpretations, and recommendations, but Shall not be re ponsible for the interpretation others of the infolTniltion
developed.
F"M'Il 169-8-92
12/09/98 15:53 FAX 612 770 1657
TERRACON-S PAUL
~006
SECTION 11: SAFETY: TEARACON has ado~ted safely poliCY proced re~ for its pllrsonnel when providing services at known or
suspected hazardouS waste sites. T!:FlRACON personl'lsl will adhere t lhese procedurlils as site conditions require. A c;:oPY ~f the
"Safety Policy Procedures for Environmental/Hazardous Waste ProJect" is OR fjle with the cl;lrporate safety offIcer and IS avallable
for review. Terracon is nOI responsible or liable for injurieS or damage incurred by third parties who are not employees of Terracon.
It is undQrstood that Terracon will not be responsible for job or site saf Ly of the project. Job and site safety will be lhll sole respOl'l-
slbility of the contractor unless contracted to others.
SECTION 12: SUBPOENAS: The client is responsiblQ, after notifica'tio ,for payment ot time charges and expenses resulting from
the required response by TERRACON to subpoenas issued by any pa other than TERRACON in conjunction with work pArformed
under tl1is contract. Charges are based on fee schedules in effect at the time the subpoenil Is served,
SECTION 13: LII'JIITATION OF LIABILITY: The client agrees to limit TE RACON'S liability to the owner and all constNction contrac.
tors and subcontractors on the project arising Irom TERRACON'S pr esslonal acts. errors, or omissions or breach of contmct or
other oause of action, such that the total aggregate liabilitY of TERRACO to all those named shall not exceed $50,000 orTEFlAACON'S
total fee for the SQNlces rendered on thIs project, whIchever Is grea er, and client-hereby releases TERRACON from any liability
above such amount. The client further agroes to requiro of the contractor and his subcontractors an Identical limitation of T!:FlRACON'S
liability for damages suffered by the contractor or the subcontractor .sing from T!:RRACON'S performance of services. Neither
the contractor nor any of his subcontlllctors assume; any liability for d mages to others which may arise on account of TERRACON'S
professional acts, errors or omissions.
. '
SECfION 14: INSURANCE.: TERRACON carries worker's compensati n and employer's liability insurance and has coverage under
public liability and propeny damage insuranco policies. Certificates fo all such policies 01 insurance will be provided to client upon
reCluest. Within the limits and conditions of such il1sl,Jrance, TERRA ON agrees to Indemnify and save client harmless from and
against any loss, damage, injury ot liability arising from any negllgCl t acts of TERAACON, its emplOYCles, agents, subcontractors
and their employees and agents. TERRACON shall nOI be responsibl lor any loss, damage or \lability beyond the amounts, limits
al'1d condlllons of such inSurance. TERRACON shall not be responsi Ie for any IOS6, damage or \lability arising from any acts by
a cllent, its agents, staff, consultants employed by others, or other hlrd panles who are not employeeS of T!RAACON.
SECTION 15: INDEMNITY: The cllent acknowledges that TERRACON as neither created not contributed to the ol1!lstion or existence
of any ha28rdous, radioactive, toxic, irritant, pollutant, or otherwise da gerous substances or conditions at tht sltll. Accordingly, ex-
Cltpt as expressly providCld In this contract, the Client waives any clai against reRRACON and agRlOS to indemnify and save TER-
RAGON, Its agents, and employees harmless from any claim, liability r defense cost, Including but not limited to attorney fees and
other Incidental costs, for injury or 10S$ sustained by any party from au h exposures allegedly arising out of or related to TERRACON'S
performance of services hereunder. Client and TERRACON agree that they wilfnot be liable to each other, under any circumstances,
for special, consequential or punitive damages atlslng out 01 or reI ted to thi" 'Contract.
SECTION 16: TESTING .ND OBSERVATION SERVICES: If TERRAe N is retained by Client to provide a site representative for the
purpose of hasting or observing specifio portion" of the work or othe field activities as set fol"th in the proposal, then this seotion
applies. For the speCified assignment, TERAACON will repOl1 test suits, observations and professional opinions to Client.
The presence of Te-ARACON field representatives will be for the pur ose of providing lIeld testIng and observation. Our work does
not include supervis'ion or di~clion 01 the actual work of the Cont tor, his employee; or agents. The Contractor for this project
should be so advised. Thll Contractor should also be informed that either the presence of our field representative nor the testing
and observation by our finrn shall Qxcuse him In any way for defect diacovClred In his work.
The term, "observation", implilil$ that we would ObSQrvll the progres of the work we have agreed to be involved with and perlorm
tests from whieh 10 develop .an opinion as to whether the work liS llntially complies with the job requirements.
With any manufactured product there ate statlsllcal variations in its u iformity and the aocuracy of tests uSed to measure its qualities.
As compared with other manufactured products, field construction sually has wider fluctuations in both product and test resultS.
Thus, even with very careful testing and observation, It cannot be sai that all parts 01 the prOduct oomply wllh lhe Job requirement.
Our proposal Is for the scope of services requested by our Client Th degree of certainty for compliance with project speCifications
is much greater with full time obsQrvatlon than It Is with intermitte t observation.
SECTION 17~ SAMPLES: TERRACON will retain all soil and rock s plCls that are transported to TERRACON laporatories lor 60
days after $ubmi~sion of the report. Further storage or transfer of amples can be made at cliel'lt expense upon written rGlquest.
SECTION 18: SEVERABILITY: If any of the provisions Qontaln.d in this Agreement are held illegal, invalid, or unenforceable, the
enforceability of the remaining provisions will not be Impaired.
SECTION Ul: TERMINATION: This Agreement may be terminated Y elthe~ party upon sevell (7) dil)'$ written notice In the event
of substantial failure by the other party to perlorm in accordance w th the terms hereof. Such termination shall not be effective if
that substantial failure has been remedied before expiration of the p riod specified in the written notice. In the evenl of termination,
TERRACON shall be paid for SQl'\licQf.l perlormed to the terminatlo notice date plus reasonable termination expenses. ExpensCls
of lermlnation or suspension shall include all direct costs of TEAR CON raqulred to complete analyses and records necessary to
complete iLs files and may also include a report on the services p rlormed to the dale of 1'10Uce of termination or suspension.
SJ;CTION 20: ASSIGNS: Neither the client nor TERRACON may de egatc, assign, subwrite or tn:lnsfer its duties or interest iro thia
agreement without the written consent of the other party.
SECTION 21: PRECEDENCE: These Terms and Conditions shall tal< precedence over any inconsistent or contradictory prOVisions
contained in any proposal, contract, purchase order, requisition, notice to proceed, or like document regarding TERAACON'S liervices.
-~
1'f~CO~- T. PAUL
raJ 007
12/09/98 15:53 FAX 612 770 1657
.
.
.
November 25,1998
, rerracan
3535 Hoffman Road East
While Bear Lake, Mlnnlllliota 55110.5376
(612) 770.1500 Fax: (612) nO.16S1
Mr. Jim Rothstein
Donlar Construction
41 Riverside Drive North East
St. Cloud, Minnesota 56304
Re: Addendum to Proposal for Constructi n Testing Services
Monticello Community Center
Monticello, Minnesota
Proposal No. 4198264A
Dear Mr. Rothstein:
We are submitting herewith our cost estimat for providing materials testing and special
inspections for the above referenced project. he cost estimate is based upon our review of
the plans and specifications. For the purpose of making the estimate we assumed certain
time periods of work as the actual construction chedule was not available.
We understand the final costs for testing and in pections will be split betweenDonlar and the
City of Monticello. Our estimate is a total cost nd will be split when invoices are submitted.
Our invoices will reflect the actual number f units used in accordance with the units
presented in our original proposal dated Nove ber 11, 1998. Based on our estimated scope
of work we anticipated a total cost of about $ 2,795 for the project. This cost is not to be
considered a lump sum or not to exceed cost.
Please review our estimated scope. If you hav any questions regarding our estimate please
contact our office. We looK forward to working .th you on this project.
Barry C. organ ..
Geotechnical Engineer
bcm11c
n:\proposal\geotech\98264a.doc
Attachment
!'F- '!.O
Arizona. .A1I(ansa&. Colorado. Idaho. IIUnoili. I . KanHs. Minne$Ola. MissOun. Mornana
Nebraska. NllvaCla. Ntw Mexico. NOl'lIl C81COta. OkJahom . TeM_" . T8JlaI . Utah. WISCOnsin. Wyomil"Q
OulIlit)' liinglneerln Since 1965
12/09/98 15:54 FAX 612 770 1657
TERRACON- T PAUl
IaI 008
.
Addendum to Proposal Construction Testing 5e" ices
Proposal Number 4198264A
Monticello, Minnesota
"
SCOPE OF SERVICES & A;SOCIATED FEES FOR
CONSTRUCTIO" SERVICES
MONTICELLO COMMUNI rv CENTER PROJECT
MONTICELLO, IIIINNESOT A
ITEM -Quantity Unit Rate r Cost
Field Density Testing during Earth Work: 84 Hours $30.00 $2,520.00
1 14 trips @ 6 HourslTrip
Foundation observations 76 Hours $45.00 $3,420.00
2 38 Trips @ 2 Hoursffrip
i
-- Concrete and Reinfereing Steel Inspection 288 Hours $30.00 $8,640.00
~
3 48 trips @ 6 HourslTrip
-
- Laboratory Concrete (1 set every 100 yard )
- 4 30 sets of 4 cylinders/set
-=~ 120 $12.00 $1,440.00
; 4 sets of Masonry Prisms (3/set) 12 $125.00 $1,500.00
. Structural Steel I nspection 48 $45.00 $2,160,00
5 8 trips @ 6 Hoursrrrip
~ Standard Proctor Test 2 $85.00 $170.00
-'
- 6
.
Report Preparation and Supervision 16 $65.00 $1,0400.00
7
Transportation (Trips) 65 $25.00 $1,625.00
8
Nuclear Density Equipment 14 Days $20.00 $280.00
9
, $22,795.00
ESTIMATED FEE (ITEMS 1 THROUGH C)
.,
.. Please note that this is only an estimate anc should not be considered a maximum not-to-
I
!, exceed price. A revised estimate could be p ovided after a construction schedule has been
- established.
.
i
,.,
~F",3'
.
.
.
Council Agenda - 12/14/98
7.
Public Hearin - Consideration of resoluti
Hiehway 25 Project. (1.0.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGRO
The Trunk Highway 25 improvement locat d from 1-94 to Kjellberg Mobile Horne Court
involves numerous City improvements, w ich include improvement of Oakwood Drive,
School Boulevard, Chelsea Road, and Dund s Road. The Trunk Highway 25 improvement
also includes numerous trunk sanitary sewe , water main, and storm sewer improvements,
along with lateral sanitary sewer, water mai , and storm sewer improvements.
The City of Monticello will be responsib e for these local costs as part of the Trunk
Highway 25 improvement through a Cooper tive Agreement with the Minnesota Department
of Transportation (Mn/DOT). It has been id ntified that a portion of these costs is assessable
to adjacent property owners for these impro ements along the above-mentioned streets and
along Trunk Highway 25, which is the reas n for the public hearing.
A summary of the costs and the propose assessments is included. These costs have
increased due to several factors, includin right-of-way ($220,000) future right-of-way
($128,000) and storm sewer ($390,000). Th right-of-way costs were anticipated to increase
from the property valuation estimates. The storm sewer increases are due to the method of
cost-sharing by Mn/DOT and an increase i the unit price. We are working on options for
reducing the storm sewer costs with Mn/D T, as well as looking at alternative designs. We
are confident that these costs can be subst tially reduced.
The assessments are based on averages and are not expected to vary, which is why we feel
the public hearing process should be comp eted.
The City Engineer and staff will present the proposed costs and possible assessments
associated with the local improvements i cluded in the Trunk Highway 25 construction
plans.
A cooperative agreement will be drafted by n/DOT and submitted to the City for approval.
The only issue remaining is negotiation on the storm sewer split and possible storm sewer
redesign.
One other issue noted at the previous public earing involved the McDonald's/SA access and
new service drive. This has been include in the plan, per Council direction, at a cost of
approximately $80,000 of which $27,000 is assessable to McDonald's, SA and Hoglund Bus
Company. The $54,000 right-of-way cost 's not assessable.
B. AL TERNA TIVE ACTIONS:
1.
Resolution to order plans and speci lcations for the Trunk Highway 25 project. The
resolution for approving plans and authorizing the ad for bid will be forthcoming
13
F:\WPWIN\ I 0 I 0.00\ 121498-cnc1agn
.
upon resolution of the storm se er Issues and completion of the cooperative
agreement.
A bid letting has been tentatively se by Mn/DOT for March 26, 1999.
2. Motion to continue the public he ing at a later date for the Trunk Highway 25
improvement.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
This public hearing was previously table due to unknowns with the Mn/DOT funding
agreement, access to McDonald's and beca se the property acquisition was behind schedule.
The assessments are somewhat independen from the design and project costs, since only a
portion is being assessed. Therefore, the pu lic hearing can be closed and the project ordered
without completing the storm sewer trunk esign.
It is our opinion that the utility, storm sew r, and street improvements are reasonable and
necessary, will improve the value of the adjacent properties, and should be assessed
accordingly. The storm sewer issue and co perative agreement will continue to be worked
on and will be brought back at a future me ting for approval.
It is our recommendation that the project i ordered, with the plan approval set for a future
Council Meeting.
.
D.
SUPPORTING DATA:
Preliminary Assessment Roll
Right-of- Way Summary
Memo Addressing the Project Scope
Cost Breakdown
.
14
F:IWPWINII 01 0.00\ 121498-0"0108"
.
.
o
Q)
o
:.;:;
c:
o
~
'+-
o
>-
+"'"
.-
()
.
$
l::
Q)
E
Q)uo
>..,. ~
e q~
c..COo
E~,",:
- 00
LO Z Z
N 1) 1:)
>- C1).~
ro '[ e
3:a.c...
.c. ~ 1Il
en ._ g2
I u:>
~
l::
::J
....
I-
~
~
~
CD CD
... E
= ",
- ",
:s CD
u. ",
",
c(
l!
'tl =
CD CD
", E
o ",
a.",
o CD
... ",
D. ",
<C
e
E:e
S'tl
=
~CD
U)a.
~
CD
...
:::s
~~
="0
2 =
~ 8.
><
w
i
0 0 0
0 co co
(0 cot
N. to:
Il) N -
0) ... -
4A- ~ .......
N
4It
0 0
co co
~ ~
.....
N .....
... N
~ -
4It
>-
\'lI
:t
0 '0
0 a 0 E -~
8 w t":, OJ
'C ~l()
Il) N '0 >- i;'
oi ''It C \'lI :t .... :e.
0 co \'lI :t ;;t
... '0.......... ca
4A- 4It o 0
.~ E E E
'0 OJ OJ E
,5 'C 'C
~oo ::J
U)
8 0 0 rell)~ ...
4A- 0 CI) ~ .... >- tI)
0 0).. 0
0 N. -g~~\'lI
0). Il) M o ,- 0)
0) lJll)...:t 0'"
... - ,5 4A- W '0 c ..,..
Il) 4A- co
W '0 III l/) ..... o ;;
4It CCI)Q),c
\'lI -g -g .~ :;:
U
2lJ(j= ::J
lIlcc<( ...
8-- ...
1:)" : i en
0 0 l:: .....
0 W 0 Q) 0 ....(0
0 4A- &e o "'.
0 -.. Q, 0 Cl(O
N. ..... e l:~
(0 N
ct) 't":. \'lI :E .
4A- l/) ~
- v.;
4It 8
<i:
.m
0
z
~ -
'tl
co
a:: 0
a::
'i> co
c CD
;.. ",
= = "ii
0 0 .s:.
;I :e <J
u -
= = ==
...
J:J - 0
(j) ",
= c ;- a::
0 0 e
<J <J
:::s
t; ~ .c -
10 :::s
~ :w D. u. ?-- ,
U) ::>
"
8
"'.
(0
~
4A-
o
~
.....
0)
...
4A-
o
o
...
'8;
ct)
4A-
o
o
ct).
N
10
;;t
a
.
(/)
....
c
Q)
E
(/)
(/)
Q)
(/)
(/)
<(
Q)
..0
co
..0
o
l-
e..
.
oQ
c
'0.
o
~
co
c
oE
Q)
l-
e..
.2
a;
(.)
;:;
c
o
:E
.....
o
~
(3
uf5
It)gC"i
N I (<)
COO
~~ """:
== 0 0
..cZZ
.Q>.oJ 0
::I: g Q)
~'2'2
2a.a.
I- >- 0)
~U)
u~
..
c
- E
JJ :l
~ ClI
III
III
<
cc
.- ClI
III E
E III
ClI III
.. ClI
III III
~ III
<
ll')N/'-OOCOI.OCl.....(")NN
~~~~~8~~;1;~g~
N.ori N~lOlOrialN"
~N(") (")N.....NN~~ClI
~~ ~~~~~ ....
4It
ggggggggggg~
..
c
,=,ClI
S E
'c :l
III ClI
(/) III
III
<
ggggggggggg~
..
C
ClI
- E
Sill
o III
... ClI
III
III
<
..
c c
.- ClI
III E
E III
S III
III ClI
3C :l
<
gg~t::~~~N;Z
(")OlI.O(")/'-.....N
~;t~~~~~
~ ~ il't4lt
gggggggg~
c~ggggggg~
'='e
~ III
C III
III ClI
(/) III
~
I
..
c
ClI
E ~
o III
.. ClI
(/) III
III
<
I
OO",COIJ:)(")NNCl
~~r--.ll')COOI.O"'CIO
IJ:) ~iI't'<t./'-_N.~
....... N,-N(ft
~ iI't~il't4lt
....
..
C
ClI
.. E
ClI III
1: III
(/) 3:
~
OO'<t(")Nr--.O"''<t
iI't~..........(")CO~Nr--.
r--...-ll')'" CO....
~~g~ ~~
iI't ~ ~4It
.,.'I""'"lOt-lllGl
;;!~~;;!;M
SE~~~g:;
o:l~ ....
. ... :
III
<
co
'"
o
~
......
...
c
ClI
E ~
o III
... ClI
(/) III
III
<
ll')OCOOCOI.ON",r--."'NUI
'<t~'<t~I.OCONll').....ll')OO
(") CO '<t/'-<OIJ:)ll')Olll')~
~ Ii ~gg~~~~~
4It
ci
e
a.. .
aLL.
E...J
~
.Q
<
I
II
LU
ll')/,-ll')1.O ......3
Il:!co..-"'! "'":<
00ll') . ."'Or--.>
'<tll')ll')'<t '<t
~i,C).......,... ....1-
Z
UJ
::E
(/)
(/)
UJ
(/)
(/)
<
...J
~
12
ci3
::l
(/)
ccgggga
.- ClI
III E
E III
S S1
III III
.3: ~
...
C
~Gl
S E
'c :
III ClI
(/) :
<
00000
~~~~4It
...
C
Gl
~ ~
1: III
(/) :
III
<
ON"'gNN'<tO'<t'<tOIt>
iI't~:h 12~~~~N~~
~~ ~~~t~1i ~
iI'til't ~il'til't~iI't ....
4It
..
Gl
C
~
o
ti
Q)
'e 0)
a. c.c.c.=l!:
n) e e e .~
o a.. a. a..:::!:
(l)13EEEQi ~
o ~ E E E '2 .... (jj
c .- 0 0 0 III Q) ;;;:
:.;::::!:<..)<..)<..)05'""
<..)lijQjQjQj~ai~
e-EEEE.gQ)C:
lQ Q) III lQ III C III lQ
<..)<..)~~~~(!);;(
...
C
Gl
E ~
o III
... Cll
(/) (I)
~
<D<')COION
o'<tCOOlM
~~;;~~
iI't 4It
ci
e
c.....
aGl
c ClI
E-
~
.Q
<
II
LU
::l
:8:B ~~O~~ ...J
ON....:OMa:ir--.~U':i~O;;
~(1; 5i~....M~ ...
Z
LU
::E
...
c
ClI
... E
Cll 1/1
1: 1/1
(/) :
~
1l)<')"'0~
<')MI.OIl)CO
r--.ION"''<t
~g~liri
iI't 4It
..
Cll
C
~
:0:0-
E E
~ ~
~~
'ii)gg ~
32l::t;B'
~ 8 8 'C c. t=,
o ~ 0 Q) c .- c
'a<l:~~.5~ .5
:!_...........xQ)
~ccO)o.e ~
(I) .Q .0 c. LL. III LL.
o Q) iii iij ::l .. a.. c. c. c. ..
= 1:: .. .. (I) 0) .-.-.- 0)
.~ ~ & &::; ~ g ~ ~ ~ ~
c:o:.5:Ec(l)~Q)C1)Q)(I)
oa:ellQ)~5ilQ.e.e.e5i
:::!:_c:::c::: ;;I-7lQllllQ;;I
o~1313~>-ga..a..a.>-
.?;- E E E ~.!: I!! g> g> g>.!:
0~~~~<3j~~~<3
ci
e
a.. .
, a LL.
E...J
~
.Q
<
II
LU
::l
<')cococo:ci!
~'<tIO~>
...
Z
IJJ
::E
(/)
(/)
w
(/)
U)
<
...J
.:
o
t-;'
CXl
::l
U)
....
ell
Cl
lQ
a..
~:E:
C 'u
~ioss
5.= 0 ~
1/1 ClI III 1/1
c'!:! ~ 0
",ca.
.9- 5 i .!'.!
f::E-.3
ClIOO~
c ~s c
~ ._ :! .J!!
ooU)(!)
...;
0
'0
9 g 9 9
~
'ii lQ 'ii 'ii
.... 0 .... ....
.. .. ..
II oo'<tCOOOOION<DO III .....oooooo/'- lQ '<t >- (") N
a.. Q.)~.....O(l')N(W')...........O...... c.. <')<')NI.OION..-O a.. ~~gg
~~~;;J;~~~;;~N~ OOOOOOON
.,..-~.....~.....~.....N N_NN
o.....,-ogOT"'"".....IJlifO 9g8ogog~ '<to'<t'<t
iil9"-'7~ ,9'7..........9 'I""'"......"'Il""'*..... u
0)(1;00 "''''000''' ' ,~ '~ '0 o.coo
I'-r--.I.O 1.0 '<t .5
~ 00 I'-I'-ooo/'- NNMMM "'0 o .Ql 0 0
.c0ll')1l)0~01l)101O~ 00~0~0~1O 1l?C:::1l?1l) '"
T:.J,.},~J, .bJ,J,J, J,J, J, J, J, ll)'OIOLb B
~101l)1O1O1l)1O1l)1Oll')1O 1Oll')1l)101Ol()1O1O 1O-1l)1O III
......~'I""'"..........T""'I""'"......""""...... ~""''I'"''"~'I''''""'''''~''''' ......0....'1"""" '0
. 0
'ii 'ii 'ii '"
.... . ~~pj::i~~:sl:;~~:h .... . 0~'<t1.01'-0l0..- l:! ci 1l)1.Or--.0 ~
.. 0 .. 0
lQZ IIZ ..-.....NNNNM<') ClIZ ~......~N a3
a.. a.. a.. (/)
~
,.. 'a..-
- -
.
tJ)
-
c
Q)
E
tJ)
tJ)
Q)
tJ)
~
Q)
:0
co
..a
e
a..
-
o
"2
'0.
o
~
co
c
.5
Q)
....
a..
.
.9
Gi
u
.~
c
o
::E
-
o
~
o
u::5
~M
~~g
>.O)~
nl ,
~ ci 0
-g,zz
,- U U
J: Q) Q)
"2 '2' '2'
20.0-
I- >. In
:;;;:tJ)
u~
... en M ~ lO <0 It) ... ..... R~ IX) 0 N IX) CTI to N ~ '<t M 0Cl
l:: 0 IX) lO 0 G> C N <0 .... Ol <0 lO M N i'! G>
Ql 0 IX) ..... '<t N CI> en '<t M '<t en N en M ..... CI
~ E N N N N N N E N ~~ N lit ri N <:6 ;i ri <:6 .0 ,..: ~I
IfI ..... lO IX) lO ..... ~ S IfI lit tI') tI') tI') tI') tI') lit lit lit
III lit ..... lit lit lit ,., 0 VI ...~
Ql lit ... I- CI>
' ,
III III
III III
<( <(
... 0 8 0 0 0 CI ... 0 ~~ ~ 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 ~ ~ ~ CI B
c C lit 0 lit lit a l:: l:: lit lit lit lit lit lit lI'I-
'j; Gl IX) lO ,., 'j; CI> ~~
E E .0 ,..: "' E E
III M N IQ III
S III tI') lit ... S III
Ql CI>
nil III nil III
:: III :: III
<( <(
... 0 0 0 ~ ~ a ... 0 ~~ 0 0 ~ 0 0 ~ ~ 0 0 0 a
l:: lit 0 0 CI I:: lit lit lit lit lit lit lit lit ...
~CI> '<t IX) N ~Gl
J!l E ci l!i iii .l! E ....
N ..... ..,
'j: ::: lit lit ... 'j: =
nil Gl nil CI>
In = In :::
<( <(
... ..... 0 lO M N .... ... N ~. ~. (:0 0 N (:0 :?l .... N ~ '<t M 0Cl
C lO M <0 0 ... IQ C <0 .... Ol ~ <0 M N i'! G>
CI> (:0. M ... en "'. ~ Ql en '<t M '<l" N Ol M ..... at
E E W 0 ~ zi ;; ,.: E E N ~~ ~ lit ri N <:6 ~ ri <:6 .0 ,..: ~<<>l
III ~ f") VI tI') lit lit lit tI') lit lit lit
.s III ... .s III I""~.
CI> Gl
In III In III I.... ,.,
III III I........
<( <(
... (:0 M <0 N ~ ;:i; ... 0 ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 ~ ~ 0 0 0 ~~
c lO lO .... '" C lit lit lit lit lit lit lit
Ql ..... M M N (:0 CI Ql I.....
-u; E 0 ,..: i N 0 .,; ... E ~
~ I.:.
!: III ;; $ ~ ;; co III It
III lit .... III
CI> ... CI>
In VI (/) III I
III VI
<( <(
c:i. II c:i. II II
0 W 0 W W
... ::::l ... ::::l
a.. (:O..J 0.. ..J :J
ClU: (:0 lO .... '<l" ClU; o~ ..J
M ... ~ .... ~~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
c...i ..... en lO l::..J ~
E l- S I-
:::J Z ::I Z I-
.c w .c w
<( ::E <( :IE Z
In (/) W
(/) l/'J :!:
w w en
l/'J l/'J en
In l/'J
<( <( W
..J ..J en
~ ;: en
c(
~ u.
0
... en ... Iii en ..J
CI> "0 "0::;) CI> ::::l
c c 5l/'J l:: c c In ~
3: .2 3: c ~ 2 :e
en Q> 0 4i ...
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 III Ql 111 III 111 ~ 0
I =I tl Iii Iii 4i '0 .., U I-
'ii 'ii c
c ~ C -I:: Ql Ql enUl ::l Ql III 0
U u LU CO CO C Ql ...J Qj U
Ql ;l ;l ;l * 'c c ;l Z
Gl l:: l:: ~ .t::l .t::l c ~ d d ~ l::
~ l::_ 'w U ~
0 0 o .... c 0:: 0:: ~ III U u .!: .E ~ 0
:IE ::E :IE'" III ...J ~ ...J ...J ::E
O/l _<>d ...., <>d O/l UI '0 ...J ...J l:' l:' O/l C)
- '0 Gl O/l .Q .Q '0
t::: 0 Ot::: O/l ,f;; .5 .8 .8
III ~ ~ ~~ Qj 1ij 1ij 1ij 2 c 2l 2l ~ ~
::l ~ .l9 ..c Qj Qj 111
Ci.i i3 i3Ci.i 0 :IE ~ 0 0 0 :iZ" :iZ" i3
(.) ...., U CJ'J ...., 0
:S~
::It::
0 0
CJ'JZ ~
"0"0
C C ~
:::J E
Ol lO
0 .....
8 I I 8 ri
E 0
'ii E 'ii ~
o 0
u ~J:: ~ lO
... .....
III 0 Gl (I) 0 III 0 0 g 0 '<t 0 0 c5 NlO
a.. UI III a..
0 111 111 0 '<t M ... 0 N 0 0 0 0 00
N ~ ~ N 0 0 0 0 N 0 '<t ... :g ~ ~~
M ~ (l)M 8 ... 0 ... N 0 N 0
'<l" "O'<t 0 0 '<l" '<l" 0 0
..... ::l ::l ,,:; 0 ~ 9 ;; 9 ... 0 g ;; ~6
.:, r:l.. a.. N N 6 0
Pl N cO cO
0 c C <>dO M M M 0 M 0 ~ 00
..... fl fl ~;.;:; 0 J: q J: lO 0 Il) en en ..... ...
M .;., lO .;., .;., .;., 0 9 .;., MM
N (I) Gl 111..... lO lO Il) Il) '" '" Il) .;., Il) '" ..... ....
0:: 0:: r:l..N ... ..... .... ..... .... ..... .... ..... ..... ..... NN
'ii <(<( 'ii ;:5 ~
~ 0 .... Cl ~ 0 .... N M Il) 0 N M '<t 1'-(:0
lO ..... ..... N N N ..... '<t '<l" '<l" '<l" '<t'<l"
"Z lOll) " ."z N N
D.. 0..
..-.- .n --- ____no ...
~
~
N
111
en
CIl
0..
d
.E
III
2
III
'u
o
<II
~
CO
~
7-3
.
Preliminary Opinion of Proba
City of Montie 110
Trunk Highway 5
City Project No. 96- 4C
WSBProject No. 103 .50
~"-~-~~---~~~~"~---"~~"W---""l
}^ ' ~ ^" -
~.,...........~~~........~"",_....J
Partel Sanitary Sewer Watennain Total
No. Parcel 10 OWner Assessment Assessment Charge
51A Recent purchase City of Monticello $29,400 $35,800 $65,200
tU {:)I:{1t$65i200
m!ls!II~J.~!!!~II~;jliilili.BEl~i2NJr~"~'" ' C' " ".",.. "",_".",,~ww~, .- ,,,-- .-.," -71"_ -," " , , , "" "', w "=. __~ - w~ )
~ ~ } , < .,
=>i.W"~.-.........~_~~o.~~~""'~;X:~~~~~~-~
Parcel Sanitary Sewer Watennain Total
No. Parcel 10 Owner Assessment Assessment Charge
51A Recent purchase City of Monticello $16,800 $27,500 $44,300
$44;3PO
__ ' , '.'" = "~__'" w. "I' " ----..=_'"". ",'- -- ..' ="' . ""-",, .". ""
' , ,
_~..~~ ...........................J
Parcel
No.
Parcel 10
Owner
Sanitary Sewer Watennain
Assessment Assessment
Total
Char e
$0
.
Parcel
No.
Parcel 10
OWner
Sanitary Sewer Watennain
Assessment Assessment
Total
Charge
$0
Parcel 10
r:r;;,;;;,n;';::":::j~~i~6::;S-;':;~'W3J:'<'I~<"' -"., -.".". , _._,. -";' , ..".-,- ,.... '''', " , 1
~~~~........""'""""""'-'~........_~.................:..........:.~~~.,""""d
'<$0
Parcel
No.
Parcel 10
Owne
Sanitary Sewer
Assessment
Watennain
Assessment
Total
Charge
$0
.
Total Proposed Assessments =
1-'"
.
M:11033.50/Storm Ass 55. (Soo)
Engineer's Preliminary Opinion of Pr >bable Assessments
City of Monticello
County Rd. 25, Chelsea Rd. & Marvi , Rd.Extension
City Project No._
WSB Project No. 1033. >0
,.
Parcel Area Assessed Cost Per Total
No, Parcel 10 Owner (Acre) Acre Assessment
13 City of Monticello 0.76 $3,085.00 2,345
32&33 155-500-113414 & 155-500-113408 James Refrigeration 2.544 $3,085.00 7,848
36 155..034-001030 Fayette Fund 0.800 $3,085.00 2,468
37 155-079-001020 Chin Yuen Silver Fox Inn 2.848 $3,085.00 8,786
38 155-079-001030 Larson-Larson Partnership 1.174 $3,085.00 3,622
41 155-500-113415 Waa Partnership 0.862 $3,085.00 2,659
52 155-500-113412 Waa Partnership 0.816 $3,085.00 2,517
53 155-500-142106 Waa Partnership 0.635 $3,085.00 1,959
54 155..079-001010 Chin Yuen Silver Fox Inn 0.811 $3,085.00 2,502
31 155-500-142207 Alan W. Mielke 0.743 $3,085.00 2,292
21 155-032-001040 Joel & Janet Erickson 0.947 $3,085.00 2,921
22 155-032-001030 Marlin & Ritz Besler 0.646 $3,085.00 1,993
22a Marlin & Ritz Besler 0.722 $3,085.00 2,227
23 155-032-001010 Charles Leininaer Sr. 0.800 $3,085.00 2,468
24 155-036-001020 Warnet Cornm Prop 0.220 $3,085.00 679
24a 155-036-001020 Warnet Cornm Prop 0.324 $3,085.00 1,000
26 155-036-001060 JoAnn & R.A. Lonaley 0.278 $3,085.00 858
27 155-036-001050 Wamet Comm Prop 0.028 $3,085.00 86
29 & 29R 155-094-001020 Linda & Daniel Mielke 0.779 $3,085.00 2,403
30 155-094-001 01 0 Gae B. Veit 0.571 $3,085.00 1,762
31 155-500-142207 Alan W. Mielke 0.167 $3,085.00 515
15 155-500-142204 State of Minnesota 0.120 $3,085.00 370
18 155-500-142300 State of Minnesota 0.061 $3,085.00 188
16 no parcel 10 number known City of Monticello 0.326 $3,085.00 1,006
17 155-500-142303 State of Minnesota 0.241 $3,085.00 743
20 155-500-142302 Glen &Lois Posusta 0.290 $3,085.00 895
20a TH 25 V drain for outlet 1.132 $3,085.00 3,492
40 155-500-142400 John & Mary Lundsten 0.962 $3,085.00 2,968
42 15-098-000010 LLC Ocello 2.677 $3,085.00 8,259
43 15-098-000060 LLC Oeello 1.610 $3,085.00 4,967
44 155-500-154400, 155-500-154403 & Kjellberg Inc.
155-500-154404 1.080 $3,085.00 3,33
48 213-100-154405 Daryl S & Michele A Cardinal 1.690 $3,085.00 5,214
51A City of Monticello 2.510 $3,085.00 7,743
47 213-100-154402 Kiellbera Inc. 2.640 $3,085.00 8,144
SUB-TOTAL ASSESSMENT VALUE '" 32.814 ,..;;:,,:';.. $101':,231
Parcel Area Assessed Cost Per Total
No. Parcel 10 Owner (Acre) Acre Assessment
51A South of School Street City of Monticello 6.590 $3,085.00 $20,330
51A South of School Street City of Monticello 1.350 $3,085.00 $4,165
51 213-100-143200 Stuart & Arleen Hoglund 0.600 $3,085.00 $1,851
Panc&Ride south of School Street & N. of Front. State of Minnesota 3.210 $3,085.00 $9,903
51 213-100-143200 Stuart & Arleen Hoglund 0.490 $3,085.00 $1,512
SUB.TOTAL ASSESSMENT VALUE '" 12.240 . >;$37,760
GRAND TOTAL OF STORM SEWER ASSESSMENT VALUE = 45.054
Steve W. odge
12/101 8 -,
- -
.
.
-~
.
.
I
Ie
2.
It
~
;
i
-I
~
r-
.....
OO(/) ~
IOI
~~$i
lJom
-c;lO
~mo
)>jg~
~c....-I
0&5
)>-1
Om
00
m'
(/)m
(/)(/)
-I
~
~
m
o
...............
~~=
:!
II
<
m
:;0
~
)>
G>
:;0
m
m
s::
m
z
-I
:3
II
lJ
C
:;0
o
I
)>
(/)
m
o
~
W
N
N
ti
(/)
c:
ID
6
~
i
UI
8:
UI
il'J
....
~
-....
fQ
UI
~
Cl
...
....
Cl
il'J
....
N
.....
en
~
4It
~
UI
0:;0
m<
~
m
:;0
I\)
CD
I\)
Cl
....
;;
~ ~
~
~
~
~
to>
o
!':d
J
4It
~
.po.
en
g:
~
....
g:
b
8
:~:.
~ ~
~
8l
ex.
o
01
~
~
o
I
r-
o
~
~
~
CD
to>
o
~
g
'"
....
~
~ ~
tl I
01.01
g ~
i ~
......
o
"0
z~
Po
m
r-
:!a 0
"05:
~-I
enO
)O;a
r-
~
:J
8
-I
~
"0
z)o
o~
. m
r-
r
.!"
:!a 0
"00
~~
Ciio
)0;:0
r-
"0
z)o
o~
. m
r-
.....
o
I
m
~
~
~
en
.:!
:!
:!a 0
"O~
~-I
CiiO
)0;:0
r-
~
;:0
o
m
r-
z
P
:c:
o
:J:
m
r-
en
~
~
:!ao m
"O~ .e!
~-I
00
)0;:0
r-
"0
z)o
0;:0
. 0
m
r-
:!a 0
"00
~~
~;:o
:-
o
:J:
m
~
~
~
"0
o
z
c
I
:J:
~ JII
en )0... ~. ~.O....N...
n;:Ot:"O""U1
r-~ ::mm' 1:-
.". .n8: o!l
~-I.o.z:"Cl
i :.,z
m
en
;;0
i5
~I
M
~
(]I
:C
i:
~
c
__ 0
-I
(')
o
en
-I
~
-"
.
.
.
..
WSB
350 Westwood L ke Office
8441 Wayzata oulevard
Minneapolis. N 55426
B.A. Mittelsteadt, P.E.
BreI A. Weiss, P.E.
Petet R. Willenbring, P.E.
Donald W. Sterna, P.E.
Ronald B. Bray, P.E.
& Associates, Inc.
612-541- 800
FAX 541-1700
To:
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of Monticello
Bret A. Weiss, P.E~ ~
City Engineer ~. ~
From:
Date:
May 26,1998
Re:
Public Hearing / Proposed Assessme ts
Trunk Highway 25 Improvement Pr 'ect
City of Monticello Project No. 96-04
WSB Project No.1 033.50
Memorandum
This memo is intended to address issues associated ith the public hearing phase of the Chapter 429
process for the above-referenced project. The public h aring phase involves presentation of the project
to the public, along with describing potential costs of he project, including estimated total project cost
and a description of the method for assessing the cos to the benefitted properties within the limits of
the City's assessment policy.
The Trunk Highway (TH) 25 improvement project is a Federal Aid project commissioned by the
Department of Transportation to improve existing H 25 from its current condition to a four-lane,
divided highway from 1-94 to just south of Kjellber 's Mobile Home Park. In order to facilitate the
development of the street, the following other ancill improvements are anticipated to be completed:
1. Side Streets: This project will develop new str et access points along TH 25, expand existing
street cOlUlections with TH 25 and develop a cont oIled access situation related to driveways along
the length of the improved street. The folio 'ng streets are anticipated to be upgraded or
developed:
· Oakwood Drive: Oakwood Drive from e isting TH 25 to just short of Chelsea Road is
intended to be upgraded to an urban section with concrete curb and gutter and storm sewer.
A cul-de-sac will be installed at the east end fOakwood Drive,just west of existing Chelsea
Road once Chelsea Road has been extended etween County Road (CR) 117 and Cedar Street.
· Chelsea Road: A new Chelsea Road interse tion has been developed with this project in the
area of the old RV Center. This project wil extend Chelsea Road between Cedar Street on
the east to Sandberg Road on the west. Fu e plans will extend Chelsea Road from CR 117
across to 90th Street on the west side of Mo ticello. .
F:\WPWIN\\ 033.S0\OS2098.hmc
Infrastructure Engi eers Planners
EQUAL OPPORTUNI EMPLOYER
?-1
.
.
.
May 20,1998
Page 2
.
Dundas Road: Dundas Road is proposed to e developed as a three-quarter access street with
access from southbound TH 25; northbound H 25; with access out to northbound TH 25. No
access will be allowed to obtain southbound H 25 as a part of this project. This road will be
paved from TH 25 to the proposed new Ced Street connection with this project.
.
School Boulevard: School Boulevard, west of TH 25, will be developed to just beyond the
proposed Park-N-Ride lot location to an urb section with concrete curb and gutter, storm
sewer and sanitary sewer and watermain ins llations.
We are proposing to assess properties a . acent to these roadways for the new street
construction in the amount consistent with e benefit provided to the properties. We are
estimating a potential assessment of $241/fr nt meter based on the assessment of a 40- foot
wide street. It is assumed that, due to the val e of direct street access to TH 25, all adjoining
properties benefit from the construction and e thereby assessed the full cost of a 40- foot wide
street.
2. Utility Improvements: Utility improvements sociated with this project include the extension
of both trunk and lateral sanitary sewer and w termain systems. Some of the utility work is
associated with relocations to accommodate H 25 and fall into the category of system
expenditures. Other locations, such as School Bo levard, involve the extension oflateral systems
to serve potential development areas and will b assessed according to benefit on a front meter
basis. The only lateral utility systems propos d to be assessed are along proposed School
Boulevard and the west frontage road from Sch 01 Boulevard.
3. Lateral Storm Sewer: This project includes th construction of a trunk and lateral storm sewer
system to serve both TH 25, along with providing ture trunk discharge points from the city storm
water system to properties adjacent to TH 25 an the proposed street areas previously discussed.
None of these areas have previously been charg d for storm sewer installation and have simply
utilized existing ditches providing for a storm w ter system that was marginal at best. With the
development of an urban roadway system, a pipe storm sewer system must be developed to carry
the discharge from the street system, as well as e off system runoff as it is currently developed.
We have provided storm sewer stubs to various roperties in the area served by the improvement
and have made assumptions for future extensi ns of storm sewer lines to serve areas such as
Chelsea Road East and Dundas Road to acco odate future lateral extensions. At this time we
are proposing to assess properties on a square fi ot basis for the lateral system expenditures at a
rate of $0.43 per square meter. We have not esti ated the trunk system receivables because this
is typically handled as development occurs.
4.
Pathway Improvements: The City is responsib e for approximately $95,000 worth of pathway
improvements, which is only a small share of e overall pathway project expenditures. Itis
anticipated that the pathway expenditures would not be assessed, hut would be considered a City
responsibility.
"?=T
.
.
.
May 20, 1998
Page 3
5. Summary: As noted on the attached Estimate Cost Summary as previously provided 'to you at
the time the public hearing was called, there are dditional trunk expenditures for the storm sewer
that are not proposed to be assessed. These expenditures will be returned to the City through
the trunk system area costs that were recently nacted by the City in February of this year. The
TH 25 project has afforded a more economica method of constructing the trunk line that was
necessary to serve the development areas in M nticello and therefore, has resulted in a slightly
earlier than anticipated use of the funds to d velop this system that is necessary for current
development projects.
As you are aware, moving forward with this pr 1ect at this time does not set the assessments for
this project, but merely acknowledges that the p oject is feasible, necessary and cost effective. At
the time the project is completed, an assessme t hearing would be held to levy the assessments
against the benefitted properties. At that time, e final assessment numbers will be provided to
the Council and the property owners. A dr ft assessment roll has been provided for your
information to give you an idea of the anticip ted assessments. However, at this point that is
merely an estimate for planning purposes. We uld recommend moving forward with the proj ect
and planning on a September 1999 assessment hearing to levy the assessments for this project.
lv/nm
F"W7:"''''
.
.
.
Council Agenda - 12/14/98
8.
Ado tion Hcarin
(R.W.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGRO
As part of the Truth in Taxation requireme ts, the City Council is required to hold this
second adoption hearing on the adoption of the 1999 budget and the resulting tax levy.
While this second meeting will technically e another public hearing, the purpose of the
new requirement delaying the actual adopti n of the budget and tax levy until this
meeting is to provide the Council and the p blic with sufficient time to digest the budget
requirements proposed at our last Wednesd y night meeting in case additional changes
were warranted.
At the initial public hearing Wednesday ni t, the general consensus of the Council was
to keep the proposed tax levy at the $4,617, 25 amount, which would result in an
estimated 18.9% increase in dollars to be c llected over our 1998 tax levy. Our tax
capacity rate would increase from 27.001 t an estimated 35.186 for next year. As you
will recall, about 4.3% ofthis increase is re ated to the non-debt portion of the budget for
such things as additional services being pro ided and to cover inflationary increases. The
other 14.6% relates to the amount necessar to cover our debt obligations, which include
the additional cost ofthe wastewater treatm nt plant debt and funding for the new
community center debt. This budget and t levy also includes approximately $110,000
to cover the startup cost of the operations fi r the new community center.
Some of the comments that occurred at our initial public hearing were concerns over the
larger increases the City has had to incur th past few years. According to information
supplied by the Wright County Auditor's 0 fice, a similarly valued home in 1998 and
1999 would actually see a slight reduction i many cases in their total overall tax bilL
This is the result of additional state aids th will be available to offset some of the other
increases being proposed. While I recogni e that many properties will see higher
property values next year, I prepared some stimates comparing taxes from 1998 to 1999
assuming that property values increased 50 on each property. These comparisons show a
range of individual property taxes increasing anywhere from 1.8% to 8%, with most
properties most likely to be seeing a 5% to % increase. Again, my assumptions are
based on the maximum levies that were pr posed by each jurisdiction, and it could be
that the actual increases might be slightly 1 wer when the final numbers are in.
As I have noted, even with the excellent gr wth in market value we have experienced the
past few years, the recent legislative action to reduce commercial and industrial property
valucs by about 12% per year has had an i pact on our ability to keep property taxcs at
the same level. With no further change in t e tax classification rates being proposed at
this time, it is expected that our overall tax capacity value of the community will again
start rising as we add new housing and co mercial properties to our tax base. Future
increases should help to offset our budgcta y needs and should allow us to keep future tax
levy requirements at a more manageable Ie el.
15
Council Agenda - 12/14/98
.
B.
ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. After the close of this adoption hear ng, the Council could adopt a resolution
setting the tax levy requirements for next year at the proposed amount of
$4,617,725, which is the amount dis ussed at our last public hearing and the
amount that was proposed after our ast budget workshop.
2. The Council could adopt a final lev amount that is less or more than the amount
proposed but not more than $4,843, 01, the maximum allowed.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the resolution be ad ptcd as proposed and discussed during our
last workshops and at the initial public hear"ng setting the tax levy at $4,617,725.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of resolution; Tax levy summary she t; Property tax comparison sheet.
.
Please refer to the agenda packet summary rovided for last Wednesday night's public
hearing for additional details on the propos d budget.
.
16
.
WHER
forth th
fiscal y
WHER
in the b
NOW,
the bud
Counci
BElT
levied f<
purpos
.
The abo
Counci
.
RESOLUT ION 98-
RESOLUTION ADOPTING r HE 1999 BUDGET AND
SETTING THE r AX LEVY
EAS, the City Administrator has prepared and ~ ubmitted to the City Council a budget se
erein his estimated needs of the City of Montie 110 for all operations and the debt servic
ear commencing January 1, 1999; and
EAS, the City Council has reviewed the same a nd has made such changes therein as app
est interest of the City of Monticello;
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE C OUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTICE
get so submitted by the City Administrator, tog ether with the changes made therein by t
I, be and same hereby is adopted as a budget fo the fiscal year commencing January 1, 1
FURTHER RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Monticello that there be and here
or the fiscal year commencing January 1, 1999 .. and the following sums for the respectiv
es indicated therein upon the taxable property 0 . the City of Monticello, to wit:
...... .. I.... .. -.....
REVENUE ....;.' '.' LEVY HACA NeT CERTIFIED LEVY
General $2,366,800 $266,562 $2,100,238
Community Center $472,550 $0 $472,550
Parks $660,680 $0 $660,680
Library $31,095 $0 $31,095
Transportation $17,46C $0 $17 ,460
HRA $15,29!: $0 $15,295
OAA $7,OOC $0 $7,000
... .., .
DEBT RETIREMENT.. .' .... .. ! ..
Debt Service Fund $1,302,92 $0 $1,302,927
.... ". I'.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ,
.... ,
Capital Improvement Revolving $10,48 $0 $10,480
,,' .. '.
TOTAL TAX LEVY $4,884,28 .. ".$266,562 $4,617,725
ve resolution was introduced by Councilmem ber 81 , was duly seco
Imember RU , with the 0 Howing voting in favor thereof:
1
.. ..- - .-. ... -,,- .-
tting
e for the
ear to be
LLO that
he City
999; and
by is
e
nded by
....1
.
.
.
Resolution 98-
Page 2
The following voting in the opposition:
The City Administrator is hereby instructed to trans it a certified copy of this resolution to the County
Auditor of Wright County, Minnesota.
Adopted this 14th day of December, 1998.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Administrator
J,z...,
. Net Payable Net Payable
1998 Adjusted 1999 Adjusted
Levy After Levy After
Fund Deducting HACA HACA Deducting HACA
Parks $ 0 $ 60,680 $ 0 $ 660,680
General 2,208,793 2, 66,800 266,562 2,100,238
Library 31,095 31,095 0 31,095
Transportation 16,612 17,460 0 17,460
Shade Tree 0 0 0 0
OAA 2,175 7,000 0 7,000
HRA 14,795 15,295 0 15,295
Debt Service 1,098,807 1, 02,927 0 1,302,927
Capital Imp. Revolving 510,736 10,480 0 10,480
Community Center 0 72 550* 0 472.550
TOTAL $3,883,013 $4,884,287 $266,562 $4,617,725
Net Levy Increase to Cover Debt - $566,0 5 (14.6%)
Net Levy Increase for Non-debt Portion of udget - $168,667 (4.3%)
Net Certified Levy Increase - $734,712 18.9%)
Payable 1989 Tax Capacity Rate. . . . . . . 1
Payable 1990 Tax Capacity Rate. . . . . . . 1
Payable 1991 Tax Capacity Rate. . . . . . . 1
Payable 1992 Tax Capacity Rate. . . . . . . 1
Payable 1993 Tax Capacity Rate. . . . . . . 1
Payable 1994 Tax Capacity Rate. . . . . . . 1
Payable 1995 Tax Capacity Rate. . . . . . . 1
Payable 1996 Tax Capacity Rate. . . . . . . 1
Payable 1997 Tax Capacity Rate. . . . . . . 1 .136
Payable 1998 Tax Capacity Rate. . . . . . . 2 .001
Est. Payable 1999 Tax Capacity Rate. . .3 .186
.
'88/Payable 1989
'89/Payable 1990
'90/Payable 1991
'91/Payable 1992
'92/Payable 1993
'93/Payable 1994
'94/Payable 1995
'95/Payable 1996
'96/Payable 1997
'97/Payable 1998
'98/Payable 1999 (est.)
.
Tax Capacity Value
ate
Tax Levy
$ 15,405,139
15,873,242
16,161,043
15,513,574
15,490,500
15,154,786
15,586,930
15,792,922
15,993,989
14,413,597
13,123,681
14.283
16.187
15.511
6.492
16.308
17.527
8.228
18.509
9.136
7.001
5.186
$2,198,008
2,568,106
2,506,132
2,558,554
2,526,216
2,652,527
2,841,185
2,922,800
3,059,880
3,883,013
4,617,725
*Community center levy includes $361,925 for debt servic .
12/3/98
.
.
.
CITY OF M NTICELLO
RESIDENTIAL HOMEST AD AND COMMERCIAL
TAX COM ARISONS
1998 S 1999
(Assumes a 5% increase in arket value from 1998 to 1999)
$75,000
$115,000
$150,000
$845
$1,659
$2,399
$912
$1 ,748
$2,586
+ $ 67
+ $ 89
+ $187
+ 8.0%
+ 5.3%
+ 7.8%
$78,750
$120,750
$157,500
$75,000
$150,000
$1,000,000
$78,750
$157,500
$1,050,000
$2,566
$5,236
$46,560
+ 4.9%
+ 7.0%
+ 1.8%
+ $120
+ $343
+ $830
$2,446
$4,893
$45,730
. The 1999 tax amount is based on proposed City levy and proposed m ximum levies of
County, School, and Hospital Districts as given to County Auditor.
The net taxes include proposed state aid and education credits and als include all levies the
School District and Hospital District may have for their building projects includes estimated
operating and debt service costs for the new community center and was ewater treatment plant.
KAREN\EXCEL\RICK\TAXCOMPARISON.XLS: 12/10/98
r--~
.
.
.
9.
Consideration of resolution award in
Series 1999. (R. W.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROU
Council Agenda - 12/14/98
Rusty Fifield of Ehlers & Associates will e at the Council meeting to review bids that
are to be received at 10 a.m., Monday, De ember 14, for the sale of$3,000,000 in general
obligation improvement bonds. This bond issue is for the purpose of funding various
public improvement projects that are curre tly or will soon be underway within the city,
including the Highway 25 project; the ext nsion of 7th Street and utilities to the St.
Henry's Church project; Wildwood Ridge sewer, water, and pump station improvements;
the fire hall driveway project; and the Res rrection Church/Methodist Church sewer
improvement.
As you may recall, the City had initially pi ed on issuing this $3,000,000 G.O. bond
along with the $515,000 refunding bond b ck in November, but it was decided to delay
this issue until now so that the proceeds co ld be received in 1999 rather than in 1998.
The delay was necessary because receivin the money in 1998 would have put us over the
$10 million mark in a calendar year, whic would have eliminated some of the potential
bidders. As a result, we should receive fai ly attractive interest rates on this issue.
B.
ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Council could award the sale ofbo ds based on the recommendation of Ehlers &
Associates Monday night.
2. If the bids are not acceptable, the Council could delay the award at this time.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Assuming that the interest rate received is ppropriate and a recommendation is received
from Ehlers & Associates to sell the bonds the Council should proceed with the sale in
order that financing is available for the var ous improvements.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of resolution awarding sale (may be rovided at the meeting).
17
NET TRUE
NAME OF BIDDER RATE PRICE INTEREST INTEREST
COST RATE
HARRIS TRUST & SAVINGS BANK 3.50% $2,966,900.00 $836,227.50 4.1849%
Chicago, Illinois 3.65%
Kirlin Securities, Inc. 3.70%
Southwest Securities, Inc. 3.80%
Wachovia Capital Markets 3.90%
4.00%
4.05%
4.10%
4.20%
GRIFFIN, KUBIK, STEPHENS 3.90% $2,965,400.00 $838,572.08 4.2034%
& THOMPSON, INC. 4.00%
Chicago, Illinois 4.10%
DAIN RAUSCHER, INC.
Minneapolis, Minnesota
3.50%
3.60%
3.70%
3.80%
3.90%
3.95%
4.00%
4.05%
4.10%
4.15%
.
$2,955,600.00
$841,611.67
4.2228%
PIPER JAFFRAY, INC. 3.70% $2,959,779.15 $844,049.81 4.2331%
Minneapolis, Minnesota 3.75%
First Union Capital Markets Corp. 3.80%
3.90%
4.00%
4.10%
4.20%
SALOMON SMITH BARNEY 3.50% $2,958,944.15 $847,675.23 4.2501 %
Chicago, Illinois 3.65%
CRONIN & COMPANY. INC. 3.75%
Chicago. Illinois 3.85%
4.00%
4.10%
4.15%
. 4.20%
BID TABULATION
$3,000,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 1999
.
City of Monticello, Minnesota
SALE: December 14, 1998
AWARD: SUNTRUST EQUITABLE SECURITIES
RATING: FSA Insured (Moody's Investors Service "Aaa")* !m!: 4.94%
NET TRUE
NAME OF BIDDER RATE YEAR PRICE INTEREST INTEREST
COST RATE
SUNTRUST EQUITABLE SECURITIES 3.70% 2001 $2,961,540.00 $829,160.42 4.1569%
Atlanta, Georgia 3.75% 2002-2004
J.C. BRADFORD & CO. 3.80% 2005
Nashville, Tennessee 3.90% 2006
WILLIAM R. HOUGH & COMPANY 3.95% 2007
St. Petersburg, Florida 4.00% 2008
NIKE SECURITIES L.P. 4.05% 2009
Lisle, Illinois 4.10% 2010
JOHN G. KINNARD & COMPANY 3.50% 2001 $2,966,700.00 $831,674.17 4.161.
Minneapolis, Minnesota 3.60% 2002
MILLER, JOHNSON, KUEHN, INC. 3.70% 2003
Minneapolis, Minnesota 3.75% 2004
3.80% 2005
3.90% 2006
4.00% 2007
4.10% 2008
4.15% 2009
4.20% 2010
NORWEST INVESTMENT SERVICES, INC. 3.50% 2001 $2,962,398. 70 $831,106.09 4.1650%
Minneapolis, Minnesota 3.60% 2002
3.70% 2003
3.80% 2004
3.90% 2005
4.00% 2006-2008
4.05% 2009
4.10% 2010
*FSA Insurance purchased by SunTrust Equitable Securities
.
EHLERS
LEADERS IN PUBLIC FINANCE
3060 Centre Poiote Drive, Roseville, MN 55113-1105
651.697.8500 fax 651.697.8555
www.ehlers-ioc.com
& ASSOCIATES INC
.
.
.
10.
Consideration of retaina e reduction on
14C. with Adolfson & Peterson. (J.S.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROU
Council Agenda - 12/14/98
Clyde Terwey of Adolfson & Peterson, thc contractor constructing our wastewater
treatment plant improvements, has request d a further reduction in retain age on the
project, as the project is nearing completio . You may recall previously that the retainage
was reduced from 5% to 4%. At the last C uncil meeting, we had not yet received the
letter from the contractor nor had an oppo unity to review that letter or had response
from our engineer, HDR. Consequently, t e City took no action on this issue and
requested it be placed on a future agenda.
With the current scheduled value of the co tract at $11,710,774.50, HDR has determined
that a comfortable level of retain age on the project would $350,000. This equates to
2.89% of the project or 3%. City staff con urs with HDR's recommendation to withhold
3%, therefore lowering the retaining from % to 3%.
We are very near completion on the projec ; however, there are numerous punch list items
and equipment operation verification chec s to be donc before all the money can be
released on this project.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. The first alternative would be to re uce the rctainage to 3% as recommended by
City stafYand the project engineer, DR.
2. The second alternative would be to educe the retainage to 2% as requested by
Clyde Terwey of Adolfson & Peter on.
3. The third alternative would be not t reduce the retainage from 4% to 3%.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is thc recommendation of the City Admi istrator, Public Works Director, and BOR that
the City Council reduce the retainage to 30 as outlined in alternative #1.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of lettcr requesting retainage reducti n from Adolfson & Peterson.
18
.~I AdoIson&
~ Peterson, Inc.
."Total Construction Services"
6701 West 23rd Street
Minneapolis. Minnesota 55426
(612) 544-1561
November 2 , 1998
City of Monticello
Office of Public Works
909 Golf Course Road
Monticello, Minnesota 55362
Attention: John Simola
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 9377
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55440
FAX (612) 525-2333
FAX (612) 525-2334
FAXED 271-3272
Re: Monticello Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion
Retainage
Gentlemen,
Again we request that we be allowed to reduce ur retainage on the payment application
for November. With the project nearly complet , it is time. Currently retainage is at 4%
which was $461,443.70 at the end of October. t the same time the project is 99%
complete, with most of the incomplete items du to design changes that are still being
made. Only a few pieces of equipment are not i operation at this time.
.
We request the retainage be reduced to 2% at t e end of November. It should then be
reduced to a small amount at the end of Decem er to include an amount to cover any
uncompleted or disputed items that exist. Our g al is to have a relatively short list by that
time.
It is not just or fair to continue to hold such a I ge amount of retainage on this project.
The majority of the cost items have been turned over and been in operation since
February. Please grant our request.
.
cc: file
Bob Sykes
Marci Whitaker
Ed DeLaforest
Sincerely;
ADOLFSON & PETERSON, INe.
(~J~ ~
Clyde S.Terwey, P.E.
Vice President
/0 --I
.
11.
.
.
Council Agenda - 12/14/98
Consideration of traffic si
County Road 75. (J.S.)
A. REFEREN E AND I3ACKGRO
City of Monticello staff has been in contact with Wright County and MnDOT over the
past three years in attempts to make improv ments to the signal system at T.H. 25 and
C.R. 75. The improvements requested by t e City were in regard to left turns from C.R.
75 on to T.H. 25. The state has recently pe formed a short duration traffic study of the
intersection, reviewed the accident history, d looked at three options to handle left turns
that mayor may not improve the overall tf' 'fie flow. The first option looked at just
adding a green arrow in the left turn phase. With no other changes to the intersection,
this alternative tripled the intersection dela s and was not feasible.
The second option would add a green arro and green ball so that westbound 75 left turns
would go first, then terminate while eastbo nd left turns had the right-of-way. This is
called split phasing. This, however, with n other changes to the intersection, would
double the traffic delay and was also not co sidered feasible.
The third option would be to have designat d left turn lanes. Eastbound 75 at T.H. 25
near Dominos Pizza would have a designat d left turn lane and a combination right turn
lane/thru lane with no changes in the parki g but probably additional parking
enforcement of existing parking limitations. Westbound 75, however, would have the
designated left turn lane, one thru lane and designated right turn lane. This option,
however, would prohibit parking on the no h side of C.R. 75 between T.H. 25 and Cedar
Street. This would be removing the node a d would mean a loss of approximately six
parking spaces. This alternative is an acce table solution for safety concern and has
minimal effects on delays at the intersectio . This is the alternative recommended by the
State of Minnesota Department of Transpo tation and the Wright County Highway
Department. Both will have representative at the Council meeting Monday night.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. The first alternative would be to sel ct option number three (that recommended by
MnDOT and Wright County) for f her study and to request additional
information and layouts pertaining 0 this design and loss of parking, call for a
public meeting to be held in Januar , and to notify area businesses who would be
affected by the loss of parking on t e north side of Broadway between T.H. 25
and Cedar Street so they could atte d the meeting.
2.
The second alternative would be to select either the first or second option
proposed by MnDOT and Wright ounty. However, since both of these options
increase the delays significantly at he intersection, MnDOT would not be in favor
of these. They also do not offer th same level of safety to the travelers passing
through Monticello as the third opt on.
19
.
C.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Council Agenda - 12/14/98
It is the recommendation of the City Adm nistrator and Public Works Director that the
City Council select alternative #1 for furt er study, which is the third option proposed by
MnDOT and Wright County. By providil g a safe left turn at this intersection and
additional stacking room for the right turn to northbound T.H. 25, you also free up the
westbound C.R. 75 traffic, and we believe this would improve safety and traffic flow for
our residents moving from one side of to n to the other. A public meeting could be held
on the 11 th of January. This should give' nough time for additional study and layouts of
the intersection to be completed along wit contact of all the affected property owners.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of letters between MnDOT, Wright ounty and the City from 1995 and 1998; Map
of streetscape, north side of Broadway (T. .25 to Cedar Street).
.
.
20
.
i(~\t\tlE_So~ t Minnesota Department of Transportation
)> l;(
:l '"'
~ !l:
~o .....# MnDOT
F Tl'Il"'-
3725 12th Street North
St. Cloud, MN 56303
Office Tel: (320) 654-5105 +
Fax: (320) 255-2178
December 2, 1998
John Simola
Public Works Director
City Hall
P.O. Box] 147
Monticello, MN 55362-9245
Subject: TH 25/CSAH 75 (Broadway Ave.)
Signal system improvements
C.S. 8605
Dear John:
.
This letter summarizes our recent discussions with you and right County concerning left turn crashes at Trunk
Highway (TH) 25/CSAH 75 in the city of Monticello. Cras data gathered for the past several years (95-97)
indicates that 43 crashes occurred of which approximately 5 % were CSAH 75 left turn related. The installation of
a left turn arrow for CSAH 75 would significantly reduce th left turn related crashes at the intersection, although the
left turn lane would also significantly increase the delay/congestion without geometric improvements. A detailed
analysis was performed in 1995. See the attached 1995 lett r from the Assistant County Engineer, Dave
Montebello. This 1998 analysis supports the 1995 study, in hat, delay will increase with the installation of a left
turn arrow on CSAH 75 unless some geometric modificatio s are undertaken.
Our November 1998 peak hour turning movement data reve lover 500 vehicles turning left from southbound TH 25
in the AM and turning right from westbound CSAH 75 in th PM. These heavy movements, combined with less
than ideal geometrics and a permitted left turn on CSAH 75, cause safety and congestion problems.
What follows is a short summary of the vehicle delay and si nal phasing table which is attached:
The existing signal phasing, with permitted (green ball) left urns on CSAH 75, provides the least amount of delay
(23 sec/veh) with the existing geometric conditions. If a Ie turn phase (green arrow) is installed on CSAH 75 with
no geometric changes (option #1) this will triple the total in ersection delay (70.0 sec/veh) at PM peak hour. As you
can see this is not acceptable as longer backs will occur in a I directions.
Condition #2 which keeps existing geometries and allows th WB direction (green arrow and green ball) a green
movement while keeping the EB direction red. After WB is terminated, the EB direction turns green. This is called
split phasing as each direction is served separately. This would almost double the intersection delay (44.0 sec/veh)
during peak hours due to adding a separate phase. This is al 0 not a preferred solution but would provide better
service than Condition #1.
Condition #3 allows for a separate left turn lane on CSAH 7 and includes a westbound CSAH 75 right turn lane.
. This would involve eliminating approximately 5 parking sp ts on CSAH 75 near the theater. This option slightly
increases the delay (29.3 sec/veh) although allows CSAH 7 a green left turn arrow, thereby reducing left turn
crashes. This may be an acceptable solution to the safety co cern, although delay would increase slightly from 23.6
to 29.3 seconds.
11- ,
November 14,1996
Page 2
.
It is the position of the State and County that any modificati ns should not increase delay. Both the State and
County would approve of Condition #3 if the city were to in tall a right turn lane for the entire block along the
theater. The anticipated reduction of left turn crashes woul be an acceptable tradeoff for the slight increase in
delay. Please forward this recommendation to the city for c nsideration. If the city is willing to pursue this minor
geometric modification please indicate so in writing and we will initiate signal modifications appropriately.
Adding to the congestion in this area is the River Street sign I system which isjust 400 feet south of CASH 75. It
has been observed (by MnDOT and private citizens) that thi signal system creates problems due to its close spacing
to CSAH 75. Proper spacing between signal systems in thi area should be around 2000 feet. Due to inadequate
spacing, the AM peak southbound TH 25 left turn vehicles ack up into River Street causing confusion and safety
concerns. Elimination of this system would allow more left turn vehicle storage for southbound TH 25 at CSAH 75
and consequently remove them from the southbound throug lanes. I understand that the River Street signal was
installed due to the limited visibility ofthe bank building an that it may not be feasible to remove the old bank
building. Another option would be a right-in/right-out with one way street on the east side ofTH 25. This would
eliminate the sight distance concern caused by the bank by ot allowing TH 25 access from East River Street.
Further study would be needed to quantify the anticipated b nefits. The state would pay construction costs
associated with the signal removal.
We would like to begin discussions with the city on this end avor as we feel a significant safety benefit can be
achieved with minor consequences. If the city has or is dev loping plans for the river front area near TH 25, this
would be the time to address improvements at the TH 25/Ri er Street intersection.
John, if I do not hear from you I will assume that the city is ot interested in pursuing these changes. As you can see,
geometric improvements are usually necessary to improve s fety and congestion. In this case, some removal of
parking and minor construction would improve safety at CS H 75. It must be noted that these options address only
existing volumes and do not figure future growth.
.
Thanks in advance for your consideration in this matter. I I ok forward to the city's response.
Sincerely,
.~~~-
Thomas L. Dumont
Assistant District Traffic Engineer
cc:
Don Raisanen/Kreutzer
Jim PovichlDan Anderson
Gary Dirlam
Thomas Davidson
Wayne Fingalson - Wright Co.
Enclosures:
.
11- 2..
Wright County Public arks Building
1901 Highway 2 North
Buffalo, Minnes ta 55313
Jet. T.H. 25 and .R. 138
Telephone (612) 82-7383
Facsimile (612) 82-7313
v~-rY Ok
,9 ~
v "1-
2
m
o
o
-4"Y
WRIGHT C
DEPARTMENT 0
7S56
January 30, 1995
John Simola
Public Works Director
250 East Broadway, Box 1147
Monticello, Mn. 55362
Re: CSAH 75/TH 25 Intersection. Turning Conflict
Request for left-turn lanes CSAH 75
Dear John,
UNTY
HIGHWAYS
\
\
WAYNE A. FINGALSON, P.E.
Highway Engineer
682.7388
DAVID K. MONTEBEU.O. P.E.
AsllUstant Highway Engineer
682-7387
RICHARD E. MARQUETTE
Right of Way Agent
682-7386
You had mentioned some operatioinal concerns with res ect to the CSAH 75 and TH 25 intersection
in the City of Monticello. We have looked into this iss e and the following letter summarizes the
issue and some potential solutions.
.
Based on these discussions with you it is my understan ing that problems occur during peak traffic
periods when traffic on CSAH 75 is prevented from m ing a left turn due to conflicting through
traffic movements. Since there is no separate left turn I e, this results in a back-up of traffic on
CSAH 75 and requires other through traffic to diven to the right hand through lane. Left turners
must sit and wait till the through traffic clears prior to eing able to make the turn.
Since our initial discussion, we have completed a peak our turning movement count, reviewed
accident data for the years 1989-93, and also worked wi h Mn/DOT to review alternate intersection
configurations. Accident statistics show that there were 9 accidents in or near this intersection in
the past five-years. Of these 59 accidents 27 % were lef tUrn accidents, 25 % were right angle
accidents, and 22 % were rear end accidents. While 59 ccidents over five years is not an extreme
number considering the level of traffic that passes throu the intersection, it does indicate that the
main problems at this intersection are with the conflicts between left turning and through vehicles or
vehicles that are sitting in traffic and not able to advanc through the intersection. One positive
aspect to the accident data was that 83 % of these accide ts were propeny damage accidents not injury
type accidents.
Another problem with the intersection is the turning rad. The radi are insufficient to allow for
proper turning of larger vehicles. Larger vehicles tend t either turn from the through lanes or will
spill over into on coming lanes. This reduces the capac ty and safety of the intersection.
It is our feeling that if one is to improve the intersec ion the improvement should try and
address the left turn prohlem, and radi problem. In addition, the intersection improvement
should not sacrifice capacity to address these needs a this area will continue to grow.
.
We looked at ten(10) options for reducing the conflicts ith CSAH 75 lefHurners and attaining the
above goals. The traffic division of Mn/DOT St. Cloud and Brainerd assisted us by running the peak
hour traffic counts through an optimization program.(See Geometric Phasing Summary For TH
25/CSAH 75) Option one is the existing condition. 0 tions 2-5 would add a protective left turn
,'-3
/
Equal Opportunity I Affirmati e Action Employer
.
lane with slightly different signal operations for each 0 tion. Option 6 and 7 would have existing
geometries. but would change the signal operation to h ve eastbound 75 and westbound 75 operate at
different times(split phase). Options 8-10 looked at th ee lane concept for CSAH 75 eastbound and
westbound. This would require narrowing traffic to si gle lane prior to entering left and right
turnlanes at the intersection.
Upon reviewing each of the options we made some ge eral comments concerning how we felt these
options would address the existing operational problem and to what extent that they would make the
intersection operate better.
Analvsis:
Options 6 & 7 would improve safety to for the left tu ers, but would nearly double the overall
traffic delay to the intersection. This option would req ire little or no capital improvements as the
changes could be made to the existing signal. MnlDO does not support this type of signal phasing
as it is very inefficient. Since the intersection delay/ve icle would be increased by 50 % to 20.3
seconds/vehicle these options were not considered to b an improvement to traffic flow.
Options 8-10 were considered with respect to the goals and were rejected due to the fact that they did
not consider long term traffic growth and they would . crease the overall intersection delay. Traffic
on CSAH 75 will increase as the area continues to gro . This is a concern when options for
reducing the number of through lanes are considered. e three lane concept would reduce some of
the impacts to parking for CSAH 75 on the southeast d northwest sides of the intersection.
However, there would be significant impacts to CSAH 7 traffic flow on the approaches to the
intersection due to lane drop and turn lane transition as. It is our feeling that this is not the
proper course to follow and that the existing condition s better than this alternative.
.
Options 2-5 would improve safety and traffic flow by a ding left turn lanes to the CSAH 75
approaches. The problem with adding left turn lanes uld be the impact on the parking and turning
radi. However, this option would provide the necess capacity and safety for motorists and would
allow for future traffic growth. The operation of the si al would likely be changed to provide
protected.permissive left turn movements. This would r duce the overall intersection delay from 13.5
seconds per vehicle to 12.2 seconds per vehicle. If on of the options(2-5) is considered further the
following issues would have to addressed in much more detail.
1.
2.
3.
4.
.
5.
Removal of on street parking 0 the first block either side of the intersection.
Removal of the street-scape nod s in the first block either side of the
intersection.
Reconstruction of the four-foot edian to accommodate left turn lanes.
Modification of signal to provid additional signal heads for left turning
movements.
Reconstruction of turning radi movement of signal poles. Especially the
NB TH 25 to eastbound CSAH 75 movement. This turning movement would
11-*
\.
..
.
become much tighter due to shi t in median to south. There is currently 58
vehicles that make this right tu in the peak hour.
6. Review of roadway crowns and rainage due to modification in median and
lane configurations.
Summary:
If the goal is to improve the overall operation of the i tersection it is our feeling that options 2~5
represent the best alternatives. However, these altemati es do come with a high price and some
significant impacts. While the existing situation may n t be desirable, it may not be bad
enough(existing level of service B) to gain the commun'ty support that would be required to
implement this type of solution. If this is the case we feel that the existing intersection configuration
is the best alternative. However, there may be other 0 erational modifications such as, changing of
existing signal timing to allow for more clearance time on completion of the CSAH 75 phase and
possible signing modifications to warn through motorist to use right lane. These operational issues
need to investigated further to determine how much effe t they would have. It is my initial feeling
that these type of changes may ease the left turn probl m slightly but they won't solve it.
. The intention of this report is to provide information t you for the purpose of further discussing this
issue internally at the City. If further action is reques ed by the City this work will have to be
prioritized against other projects throughout the County. In addition, MnlDOT must be involved in
any modifications to the signal and intersection configu tion.
If you have any questions concerning this information please contact me.
Sincerely,
~~dII
Dave Montebello, P.E.
Assistant County Engineer
Enclosures:
Peak Hour Turning Movement ount
Accident Information
Mn/DOT Geometric & Signal alysis
pc: Wayne Fingalson, County Engineer
Tony Kempenich, Mn/DOT District Traffic Engi eer
Bill Cordell, Traffic Technician
File
.
II.r
M \() \( ~ S'
.
.
, ",
....
,,\
. \
~ I!
i ~
f
i ,g
03
.
r;1 C
it
0\
-I
c:J
)/ :0
0
1>
0
~ I . "r~
-<
.
C t!:\)~R ~
II~I,
.
.
.
12.
Council Agenda - 12/14/98
Consideration of etition from resident for traffic control and enforcements in the
Mcadow Oak and Oak Rid e subdivisi ns. (1.S.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGRO D:
The City of Monticello recently received petition from Sara A. Watters, a resident on
Mcadow Oak Drive in the Oak Ridge sub ivision at the eastern portion of our
community. Ms. Watters drew up the peti ion and circulated it throughout the
neighborhood asking for various traffic im rovements in the area of Oak Ridge Drive and
Meadow Oak Drive to reduce and slow do n traffic. The petition, with 122 signatures of
neighborhood residents, is enclosed.
The petition asks the City to look at reduci g the speed limit to 20 mph through the
subdivision, place "No Thru Traffic" signs on both ends of the subdivision, install
"Children At Play" signs, install additional stop signs, and install weight restriction signs.
In addition, Ms. Watters' letter that goes along with the petition asks for additional
enforcement by the Sheriff s Department i the area.
The public works department has reviewed the situation out there and has begun taking
steps which we felt were appropriate to ad ress some of the concerns in the letter and
petition. The following are the steps taken
1. "Slow h Children" signs were plac d on Meadow Oak Drive near the north end of
the subdivision and on Oak Ridge rive near the south end of the subdivision.
These signs were older signs in sto k. New signs indicating "Caution - Children
At Play" will be placed when they rive.
2. Five new stop signs were requested to be installed. The public works department
has taken steps to install three of th signs requested, one on Red Oak Lane at
Mcadow Oak Drive; another at Me ow Lane at Meadow Oak Drive; and a third
at Oakview Lane at Meadow Oak Dive. The two stop signs requested for Oak
Ridge Drive on the corner just nort of C.R. 118 were deemed inappropriate by
the public works department so wer not installed.
3. As Public Works Director, I contact d the Wright County Sheriffs Department,
passed on the petition, and requeste that they do additional enforcement in the
area of existing traffic regulations d signing, and possibly have a deputy at
Monday evening's meeting to repo on the conditions found.
Additionally, the Monticello Public Works epartment did not install reduced speed limit
signs to 20 mph, as the City does not have t e authority to do so without a traffic study
and authorization from the Commissioner 0 Highways. Furthermore, we did not install
21
Council Agenda - 12/14/98
.
the "No Thru Traffic" signs as requested, s Meadow Oak Drive and Oak Ridge Drive are
thru streets. We also did not place weight restrictions on the streets through the
subdivisions, as the City only restricts wei ht when the streets arc most vulnerable during
the spring thaw.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. The first alternative would be to re iew the petition, ask for additional comments
from the audience, as City staff ha informed the petitioner that it will be on
Monday evening's agenda, make a decision that it is inappropriate to spot weight
restrict residential streets and also nappropriate to post "No Thru Traffic" signs
on thru streets. Then pass the peti ion on to the Police Commission for
determination whether to have a tr ffic study performed or request a traffic study
be performed by the Department 0 Transportation and request the Commissioner
of Highways to lower the speed Ii it in the area, and whether to add the
additional two stop signs requeste .
2. The second alternative would be n t to make any decisions in regard to weight
restriction signs or thru traffic sig s and pass the petition on to the Police
Commission for further study.
.
3.
The third alternative would be to t ke no action whatsoever on this issue.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is the recommendation of the Public W rks Director and Street Superintendent that the
City Council take action as outlined in alt rnative #1 and do not authorize spot weight
restriction signs and no thru traffic signs ut pass the remaining issues on to the Police
Commission for their review.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of the petition, photographs and lett r from Sarah Watters; Also, a copy of the map
indicating existing signing, those recently replaced, and those signs requested but not
installed.
.
22
~
.
.
IJ
.
-- '7-::J~V [f\<-bil.'J5 ': l,.(1..
,~~ ~~ oth'~ .,Ul ,2):;l
- \DbaJ ~\ Id~r~r\ : ~ 3>~ t;;"'
Pet~i:' t~~dtteSag~~I~#down traffic it"';f, r.,to
Oak Ridge Subdivision.
Proposal:
· Speed Limit reduced to 20mph - will reduce the spee< of motorists, (which currently exceeds 30mph). With
the number of children in the neighborhood, motorists n ust slow down.
· "No Thru Traffic" sigus - will reduce the number of IT otorists currently using Oak Ridge Subdivision as a
short cut from CR 118 to eastbound 1-94 ramp. Again, VI ith the number of children, traffic must be at a
minimum.
· "Children at Play" signs - will inform motorists of chi dren in the neighborhood. Again, with the number of
children, these signs are a must.
· Additional "Stop" signs - will aid in reducing the spee s and the thru traffic.
· Weight Restriction signs - will aid in preventing thru naffic from heavy trucks.
The following people signify that they agree to reduce and/Ol slow down traffic in Oak Ridge subdivision.
Name Address Phone
O:::-L '-Y A4-S~JJtt-V I 1\15 M,...r.tAcw {be.. t;...r ..%i5-hC1/l-.,
1~/ J J "rJ!v,dcJ LIAI1~/1 II =1t:) .,- )((};,k .A r, dqC-:'",.. <.f ,) Ie::,
!-/~ t' --/l d,i "r::h, do)" 11.;).0 m~A.douJf)aJ:: n; , ,Q q~-hq~R
.S/lP"'" .,..1'lt:/Jl/'Aol'i .,)5R/f) 'hi-.... ~;.J....nr).... "aq,-(~ 9/q
_~\.J. -+-<:::0.- ..'\..~ ;tr.,~I\ o-":"-~'A." ~~ \ 7_~<:;-^""f...fi!{'
,,/l) / f{~;";' ., ,i;. .rf? "/arT; - :'hlf) i1 l' ",de'?ff I', ' -::Jqe; .I:)I...{I.' "']
1'-i1((J.....~ -'llir' ly ~-1I(")nr,1'1'L\J, IJr- U^~d, .. d~'.::r:+'n
~;;k . '\~ L\ " ~....,;~ FJ'r-}'h.O r.,.., ~ 7.~,. fVi' M~" " rl4~ -'5?'-l'::;-"~
~"h~t,-. f\.)iD<",;.., 'Jf.')C' C>~dc P .".!! 0,.. . ?'J"./. 'I~q.s ..fn6 7-
,.....;~ N ~ f:frr +lCJL''''"'AN Z&!:O OA~ f..1. t/ r;r .12- .. 1- q ~ - f f;J L 9
~ h,()tlEdl6tr Z{;.<::O I1AK tl4tY,....f; '1, .' Zt7'-;-t.3/.c;;-
"tJ.f7Jc.ieJ 1Fr,.,,, \r),vvl'" r-.""8Y~ ;}.J('/IV..u if'\. .' A9..S--g...,-tp,
u,-L: .. /v; q...:..l,~ J )"0;. (05\ ,. r, l,<, It'~ ,) f"\ J. " DCI'''\: - (...iI Ct -)
7 eR.~'-DA';...,. .T,} Y o1~ I hU'lIi~t'U t'"/-1<- 0' ;;<'1>' o,:sq
hrla/7 //1rt:..Jc,n 7l7~/ c:;eKI'iuv ~rr " c/..."""z -0'75-.:;
i11/74../ 'RAref d.'/~J L>aKI/,'t"-'!) ~/...,.. "D~Cj",--- 09)"9
l P'...! oJ. fA /7r-.,'('-c'- ~'r<:LI)J.'1lf'1:.....I.I~ 1'/1 -rI-- ,,"';'4.";' oL/R.q
'K.,)lp q.- -\.{'t'~<:,.iJ . ~""71 1"\;Vu'e.\,...r {\ ..~~ " '79~-Oi-4'(
-4-.,zf't ~ t M"'l\.( (rj~~ d'I..('\ rh... u'>'-\ 'k " ~c, - o~~,
~ '- .., \. IL/",,- .':J 7 '-In......;: .~ u ',~ .) (',10- ,'.::19 5 - ;:;.. 9'ft' '-I
I"~Y\ 7.-... 1.,.-.., ...,')(,,, ht"".V,,;'..-L1 f'-l- .. rl.qr.'--~~."1u
{lLJIXC. It. ,I <(.,.W CJ:J.ltJ/~1.:. ~ ~ Z'I'S' S8(~'
V!.~/t1t- f;//cC, Ph 'he /1/4,n'JF4J (.4/ I 2yr-,.,-J"///
/ ,1..11.> '/'vs,,"'J J ~f3.1J [)l..4tuleW (J ':lq~-lil1+[
/\.H.\'~ sd~" ~ 2.lI'Se uw~....::...._ lA- ,z";S-v',M '-'
r.. de..,.} M,L">A ~.J,,,...~. """': 12(. Sf eo JHt. t.. tv. F hr... "2. r( S _ i\ ....ll ,
m....'.v1.-- -V VI\fI,J 1..1 f:'lIl1AY( l,.\11 \ crru{.v\ f..(.oJ L11IM "'7 c; t, -() q ~
H-Q,"\', ~ .....-IJ...~(.:.. ~f." i ?')C;,f:: I. '...-In, ,\ 'i- "~) ,"" - .<-)"; ~il
nA'JJul. -r:.n~ ...\ 'i.Vll Art '(.:...,J;.(-j'b,.. I 7(;./" _,.)ll~1
\ 0
# of Children
,.:.1-
...=3
L/.
1~-/Q
::l
n
~
~
/
o
'Z.
A-r'l
i.J '
;.,z...
d-
O"
r" ~
."2,
\"
J
.~'
\'
':)
tY (Idcc.'
I Y
,
~~-
7
1& -I
/
,,""., V'\,.cw~v ""',\....
l;i'l
')JIH 9l.Uf
)'71.;/ '
,;;JIir
C;;S'(,./
# of Children ;) ]1' 'J
~, ,~ $.
--l. )~
J .- ;}.-
f~ ~
2.. ;110 I V\...<l.-
.:/')__ v..>
'I
=J
A (L.I..'n
:7. (I
7..
I ~ ,.j-Ij
Z rf
~
o
(t")
~
-\
J
^
5
3
I
Name Address Phone
~~ ~ ~\ O\X\\\0\.i"\\ ~ .. '::i:(~s,,-~\
-\t}, (\ \>iY OJ. ~' ~ ...,~~ I 7h t. J.o. J -'j' J1.p ... c7-.7~\.---3 31 ()
~...( f.,y..,.~ -\. 0;'" ..... _J 7 1 l c..):] /( UI\L.... G " 1... ') 5" . l ) I ,
1/1 '1 rf <, J..1 (") -=rF ?' Rn I /) A-U)j ell T u ) '. 2<-1!:> -S-<.J. 7 t,
- . \.~, A ~ :lot l1.?iO f}-I/. rl '.' 1 ii L'II". ,,, 1,;t<;tJ ."iff; r J
\;)p/1 .5~Ve(511~1 1'1 "'-(:2-( (1(; 11,,/y'l.,.) 7 fIe "7c...;~-::-?."'~;::;"
,L ,I A -';/.....<l ..'\.,,'.Al~,", ".d- 7_""7~1,_""'-7
u" :?~/.-/ rrr.-r !/J<O>u') /~. -~ . 7/':., ,-,') '7-"'/
1 4Ull!.<;<;a....i~InMa7YlM. l&lfi,~ Dt:i.j v'ifu) Lfl'IP .. aq5- OK'd'1
!..'^"n.... 7"FGt 1,1~~:1 IJl!ku:;-w J.th...." .. ,~':-JI;"SJCfII
i::,e~~r~,(, rLu",..L <...,/...;z.. 0", :t:;.............., L4...,€ ~129t;-'117D
kt~IIJ/( leocL~ I. ~!JJ7-JJ /)cd::~~JdcJ 1. I...... "lr)Hh--08Jh
'~( ,Vi. / (! CL'--Wl..1<1 c, II.pO IrU[.,t(",I.J I)'t;ic<.. L ' ,'t'-j...,- -C.ll Po, /7
I ~""'....... 'I, ~... LWJ~ il :2. 7e;1tJt: l//i~'~'.4:ZV .141;' 8"'-13 ~
rlp:+ko. -' L.. a..~Sl l')(A,t lZ.\rJ ~... 9..ctS- -~c:.~(J
~. r1-'1 e.... "I IX'"'\; :1<X "" 1 ()a< l\-,C ~I}" Or--, ..';t,.t1 ~ ,::"t., 0-1
:tl.v\ \..D 1'\ n..D JV'I.O l\ : ~ 1 ('h t::. .(, If ,^ t::v- .. -:XJ c; ... .:l-n a..
II1'",.fln:"""tlVflM'"' IlQ) kllLfi.ClO""rJi k Or '. 7'15 - 4-IKL
tlr',,.UI/)~d 1l0tJ-!tU\ IZ&C /11N~-"""J/ '.:.y C"Y-- '. ?A'.>-- ?iVr/
N'..I~ /J~. .. J:lIS' ~~ ~,C(. .' ":J.rt:>-LI:~
<.!...." II 1011 V, UfI-:- ,. J:JL/~ ;-;'- I, 'f)r] {'r" ~ ~aS;, :~ T
J l..n.. ,J",:t 7, , "l.."6'b () c..~ -{I' lu. , r'4 ", 2-.e; ~... Jf~ ~ c{
')( \ ~A":'t' -:"d/ AAh:: 1/ 0 O~ .. ~ 7.' ~ L/?_ V ^ ;. L'7 'S - .y?:: Cj Cot
I?" ,]1, ~r11;; · a:.JJ:;. --" 11 / " U (J ~ I D ~ .cJ ~ /I ".JJA ~ .:2 q.r -1/ pp '7,
L.-J ~~J" .~U l-o~{) rn..A'd.AIll ~LJ ~ PI'... ,.Jt:JS.:.t:.314
'A~I? "~A } V4~ h...l .IlK 'I'), " J...~S"C;.:l...R rt
~ -,._~,.., lalO J'YJEA i')~OJ ,..,,_ ;"\ G'"- .. ... ~qcr - .II,?/, '7
f\V1 Yr.?) ~ \0\ sfYleQ LOlA) TK v-{.., ., tAS-SI a.'l "-
M:J'\lIn/IJ j~,,~~" ~-R(') /7fi\ 7~,..1--.,.,f).-tt-',)O '. 'GQ-4C.57
-11 ;r~+t R \V. ^ . "1 :7 Co, U ""1'JtA ..... :J, -' K..7', n r .. co c;, 5'- 00 '24
l'.k", iL.(-, ......7"'. - 12..72 I -11A.... ~(t1;o, 1v .. ~/c..-J'ttILlO
,~ A ~ -Rf",:Ju _I r. ../'AU ,?., in/> 1/ r;;J t'U ----rs:; .. ., !/'i:; - (J!ft/.:i
(". .., A -' <A~ , ,.Jl.. 7:J /'lIr tv j '(u..;v I L " A:t5 - J,.";~ B
~ -:: - , ' AI ---' ~&J' / ~ Ii.. ' LA/, . . eX 1'S- - 5'7 P .5
_, I I ..JI.2! ~'I ' /, . ilfr-y,-
~' ~ L Iii," t vr (,l I II VI/V),.',..1".........- 210 "L ().. 'of \ uJ . ' 1 f) -)(If' tJ
)1/e,~7 Fr;~A.L .:J7~.:7'-' /. '_ ~ "/ A/"" .' ":;<9-5 ..J.....,."5;:-
1-,7.:.. R.AHC/ -z...'1fA//'1-'- , ,.... ~ J A / .' 'Z.('7r-Jr?/1
f :> ~A;J ~...L I ~~7' 7. 71R' '6 A'" ,.-.J UJ . . '2...- i~_L i~ 0
1..../"_..- ,^tiDLi_. .<l PI" I I"ln.K'/,'.>>I/) I"....(NV\" c:t.cx.._t'\j;:;'71
.. I, .r.~c.tI\ (,t",() 'm!'A-lnl~6Ml tR " <...c, ~ "L1f~c::.-7
... ~""l) ~n ~,." 1\ OA.-l:_ 1'\6 " _'1f~-lP5be;-
~ ~-';'v€ ".4?AJ1 ?~l./[) 'it'<pJ()"fr / A) " 'Lu:r5'--?'dt/?
:<., , II ~1,..k~f'3 l"'f-, ;),9: X b +; I ri ('},Jb (f.; ) j T" " , :J~) t; , II. ~~1"
-r~,"'''''''' -,_.... _A.......... a..qll{') "KfO-'\'t'lCt ~ {' ",c.t.e', -!j( ~'" os~(;.,
";} c~~r ~ r~.JrfJ"1 APrl --.h.tP' J .Dele.", ~ 5- qyt, '/
.' :...... :zrcf" I jJ,' /udl. ~ f.rrJt'. .' ::z..:rt,....- A 2 \1r;,
-1/11 ;;1 '-.1; r.-.A- ":l.q l( I ~ AkJ)'/ ~ 0<'"/ /./ ., 2.q 7 - "]J Zt'j~L
o A..iJ \J F'? J.. ~ '7 q; CLI I p"'j , nl<2.J:"- 1'. !"'-J' , .; " "'1 .. t:. _ 4 7 Q '-
~I J C, ;oc:~ 7~ Ih nb_ V_ ..,:~... 1""\... L' -15:\1: -'2L<11J1 .
1 .11.. --w ~ ,b-V:c... ~ ~ .. \..,~" 7 1/, 4 J ,y. ().. 4 <' ~..1 /K V"l
\.... ~ -, l7f 'L.^...... ICl~!'. rh ,^.:i~ ~ f""'l..."]"" \'")A ~. -;;i~ " lJq\^ Ot
-~1/. ,- - _ I\W"MIi31~:\ ~k.l>1 , . 1'\13-\1',.,{4l\
l lj~\,_ ~DlJ Wo-o .f'...J ,'7r~V IllI .' ";2QS4"2..\<l
.... -....
.
\ \,' ;
:d-
~
..
I
()
a
r;...
,)
-,
/'l
~
1-
. ~ ~ +--AQ
I
--.- /
L'!1- ~
,...... -
1/ , .I j Hr t'l V,'sit-
~-
o
.... I
J
d
~
'Po"-
CD.....
r:>
3
.
--
~
:l.
.
~\
, 2 ... '2,.
.
!' '
t
.
.
Name Address Phone
~o4J... 1/111.- /..-, :;;777/ (Jp.IL7Zio.::iZ " r;,rl)d7<;'-~-37Sl_
)"~~f(\ ,^.'~ '~bl'\ IJRO\ OC"1l 1:';..1'\(, ,-/),. .' ,)9"> .(.'11:.'1
OJA-rr 1 i...,,,~.:Y.2r CIo..,tL r -j1i~O 7lJL D;:.r.:;:. I\r- · .:::xJ,~"-~7' I
"t,vr ~ "3t ~ "fl'of n 4 () m 4", rl tJi , oJ 0 c< .. t(K. . . 7jj5j~ -(AC-/ !r. '::J
..}~+IIJw" ~ '7_"';)\ O(~\L-,_;X1.1. \:lV- .' Jq\-4<JIIJ
J'I1~'(:"r) 'f'7:!.c.ar?'J (/.!c ,2.Jt;?J IltLf kiC(/J.~{3';1_ 2.-(l~--1t7? $
~"'TI'II' UI'k,If';r/-Yff[;q; .::;'l:/() {'y} L:"'''''trTo'' I \,..- oJ. . ,-:;.C;<;- ~ 't ~~-
f'a..fd- /..cu'Pr: J.::./J.7fl'/ ",1 l.M~ "I' ~... Dw'" .' riC} 0{ ~'l ~;oc
t\,~- _ ,j 1- oj"- ")".,.. "'^ .\ .bn-1.... P \ ....J::. . . 20" _ L - ,
~rrV 7../PJ.-d:i..M j ~,7/? I?Jk ;f,-, ..lIg .' .;l'fC;- aSgb
I(~k ./tr N\. yS .2" "IS ^'" -'\ ,.u_ fJ ".';/1> .' ~"t.,. - ~11 ~
~__ \.u.;ut lLj ,j11J~ I\.A.nH... .......,..(.LL--- .' ::vi t5. L <;"l,/1o
~" ..) ~.... .J. .6 '10 I :.....J....ua b lAva ., /l.'1 ~ --~:u--z. Y
7 --" ~./.../. Il --;;[ k7J J. n'I ()A-Y jAJ " ...2,.9,., - ?9'Pt")
~ .'-' vet! c -_ l26o/()' ~&dl"Wi' Lvt/ .' Z9'6 ....b'/76
IA J. ",.J.7\J),.... 'L;... A', _,/~'" I'" 1/ A... If) .' ~9.r~J'.39R'
-rAtJL."~AJ1,.....It_o( 1~,^L61~........t (i)Q,.(L 0"""\ ., 2Q&"f?'I2./1./
kA, ,,+i'o"~ L_....~p Y :.110 II ~~. ~, t2..' ~?;:. U .3 :; ~
","",Q..'\' 'dU?.J ...../lJAlr/- .. "::.l..,.,---XO;51
0J. l.t.P.. . fY~ """'- 2(,'i1 L LJ O~ L4. '. 2.., oS '8 SO:J.J
-t:t ...... .: c:::".. L-..I .. -j.. ... '" I. '2. r-.. 1'0.... ~ _ W ,,., .-. ,-' " C::fjiif - "'<1 => -,
"/' a...t.--, ~ {) ::S:iil\ ~ - , ~I A..A' ,. ~cr--1 . ii k,_
-. ". t.) 'H,,~tf~ ;:'71', AI~(,It.f) _ /,.;1- .. z.jf"- ~ c 7Y
~ \l...~IIA.--/ :;)fIliI JV1....,.JJ-J. /'~'lr .' ~~'lK~
11 7J I
,.
I
# of Children
#'5
'-3
I
~t
?v
a
=( f/",'!)
.{,J ~ '-'.
2-
;z.
...:,
/)
().
! -+ J
:g +1
..:2.
in
;;l..
I
"3
~
.d-
o
'0
,
~
- '-.
rz. ... 3
.
.
.
Nal1)e / / / Address Phone
kt::::::'"...... ~ A ~ n, .,7\ mrar{...JtJ&.K-()r;..p '. Z?s-. s-W'6
, 'k ;'1I'c:::-~ 94Z6 /o/EAaJ;..l ALJ. /J?It.J~ Z9_~--C..Z3"5
.;/<. V.~ J.lPfJ/-I::::'" C1~O .;v}e~\J t?M I rl(..,G.. n...q< - ,""" ceo
J6i(j/l "V,/( TUJ A... A .u~ C4i.-- F- " Phi:" -'t"".r--;;
#>.... f)L-.b-V 'JIZ/,I) ",1 OokC.'r:,tIe... .' '2"~-1'fJ5'
'"'2'm ,oCi:? ~. t// ii/HAl <J Ir/Jj ?",J f"i.hk' /A Y .' ;::;J q~ .::l h ':J..:::J
"1 ICUrlO In 1'\( 1 { rf ;, '1 '1\ I '~ -f' ,(\ f)nJ( ~J. 4\ f!.... . . -Zq~ .?j 32.U-
rv~" /') ~..,............_ ~q._? fA I J'P,,,/ ('in>> '~~-f . · :J....q.f:-(;q;). /I.
mV~ n Y""zv., \. , I ~'/I d . . tY ?' /-
;:;"--;'0", ......[z...:-rrr 0 'rl.(~<11 r2 eJ} O(t.~ kL _'" . . ..::L qS - 3~? '1
'h." ~ 6. ~ D~'U'- ...... ~ 2-/,; ~ ~, fl)a....h.- ~M · . :J a \- - ) ~ j /
If 1'. ,,1 ~ ~ No ^ OA .J. (^ f\{) r.<. J rJ riA J. 1'7\/.IV..-' Q..q;ci:::- In {,/l~
I....,-.....A (Yff'l1-d~ rr t!^7cl(')'fk~",.L..,....11:A. ".-:r-i ,....-('l1b-'
.....". ~ .I /'~ :J.7d-6 P"\fA.;"\r\W ifr.^Jt. .' d...q.~~ a-fYfL
"./~/~JJJ' 0 ?.,AtJ - AA.M lA...f'L.. . _? ~ <-- n.s-J
,~ ltii lJ'~;it'\.. d:{dJ u,..,..."..t:.: .J l rt~ .' d'q<)-(." 97 <.j
~ tV 1.\'.1.... ,,_ r'J);>.::>n. f('\":..l\.. 1-C\fII.O .' !}qt("(VT;f\ ~,S-l
~
# of Children
~
n
('J
z..
U
_""'J
r
-......
o 1'__
;:: lA. _o(;~
4
I J
:3
rl.
.3
I
II -&I
.
.
.
1
1\~ ~~ LaUl~~ m~tcw~.
~1X>W urAlE@
12.-'
.
.
.
I Z ..iii
.
CIlKVIEW d.
J,...fMIt q
.
cli~~~~"Wlta w
~diW..en+ SWJdivi~OIl.
....::
c:':.
/~-?
.
.
.
...,
Scott F & Sara A Watters
1115 Meadow Oak Dr
Monticello, MN 55362-9572
/2 -I'
.-~..-_.-..- +-
,
· t;\j
V.W
i I ~
. 0
15
.=
10
.
I ~
,z
95th STREET
;
. - '\ 6 . _ ~ . .. . - . . . . .- ~ ~ - . - - - . - - -
: - OAK. 1<.\ bOE. so...-:Btivi ~\o.G
"TRf) ~I' Q., i ~~~~ l""
}.
-:t.
~
~
. . O.
""0
't,
.
11..1
.
.
.
13.
Consideration of reviewin bids for en rator for booster urn
Pro'ect No. 98-24C and consideration 0 award of contract for
(1.S.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROU D:
Council Agenda - 12/14/98
In November the City Council authorized he City Engineer to proceed with plans and
specifications for the water booster station for Wildwood Ridge and the surrounding area
in the southeastern portion of the commun'ty near the Monte Club hill. City statTpulled
the generator from the project being bid b the City Engineer and prepared our own
specifications and bid that portion of the p oject ourselves. The bid specifications were
centered around the two existing 125 KV generators currently owned by the City and
used at the water reservoir site and variou lift station sites. All three of the generators
will have compatible power and connecto s for use at any of the sites in the city.
The bids for the emergency generator are ue Monday, December 14, 1998, at 10 a.m.
'I'he engineer's estimate for the generator 'neluded with the booster station was $44,000
plus 10% contingency ($4,400) for a total of $48,400. Since the bids won't be available
until Monday, City staff withholds its rec mmendations until that time. The City
Engineer is still proceeding with the desig for the remaining portion of the booster
station and expects to be back before the ity Council in January for approvals.
c~
23
.
.
.
TABULATION OF BIDS
FOR
ONE (1) NEW 125 KW PORTAB E POWER GENERA TOR
AND DISTRIBUTIO EQUIPMENT
Bid Opening: Monday, Dece ber 14, 1998: 10 a.m.
.. "" .
.. '"'''' ...
. ' "".
.... '" ,....
.. ""'" ",.
.... " . .".
..."", ".",.
. " '''''''' ".
.". " ",.
.,' ,',',',',',','.' '" ' '" .
. ."""". ' "..
...",..",. ,.
BlbAI\IIOUNT. ........
Ziegler Inc.
8050 State Highway 101
Shakopee, MN 55379
Flaherty Equipment Corp.
750 - 1 st Street Sw
New Brighton, MN 55112
NOBID
C.\OFFICElJOIlNIBIDTABS\ 125KWBID. TAB. '2/14/199B
~,c ~ \J0,
$36,687.00
2.384.66
$39.071.66
.
.
.
Council Agenda - 12/14/98
14.
acement of 1984 one-ton Hod
t. (J.S.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROU D:
The 1984 Dodge pickup truck at the treat ent plant is used by PSG for plowing snow
and moving equipment in and about the pI t, removing pumps and equipment from
tanks with a crane, and for pick up of mate ials as well as general transportation. The
Dodge had been used several years by the 'ity before we transferred it to the wastewater
treatment plmlt to replace an old 70's heav -duty GMC pickup truck that was there at the
time. The Dodge has basically lived out t e dependable portion of its useful life. The
body is badly rusted, the crane is inoperab e, mld the truck has some mechanical
problems. Some minimal repairs have bee done to the vehicle to keep it operational
until a new vehicle can get here, but its 10 gevity is questionable.
In preparation for the purchase of a new 0 e-ton pickup truck, plow and a crmle to handle
the 2,000-lb. main influent pumps at the w stewater treatment plant, we allocated
$43,000 in the sewer access fund. We adv rtised for bids for the one-ton pickup truck
returnable Monday, December 14, at 10 a. . We have also obtained the state bid price
for the standard I-ton which is not equipp.. d as we would like it in that it does not have
the main snowplow support package. It h s air conditioning, which we feel is not
necessary for the truck at the wastewater tr atment plant.
We have obtained a quote for the new sno plow from Crysteel Truck Equipment in
Fridley for $4,537.52 including sales tax, s well as a quote for the 2,000-lb. crane
installed from Crysteel for $3,824.42 inclu ing sales tax. The results of the other truck
bids will be available for Monday evening's meeting.
B.
ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1.
~.t\ \
G~(\
2.
The first alternative is to purchase t e new pickup truck from C & M Ford in
Hallock, Minnesota, based upon th state bid 01'$23,802.75 including sales tax
and delivery, and the snowplow an crane from Crysteel Truck Equipment for
$8,361.94 for a grand total 01'$32,164.69.
The second alternative would be to urchase the new pickup truck from the lowest
responsible local dealer should it b lower, match or be very near the state bid, as
this truck would be more properly quipped than the state bid truck. Also, this
alternative would be to purchase th truck, snowplow, mld crane from Crysteel
Truck Equipment for $8,361.94.
3.
The third alternative would be not t purchase a new truck at this time to replace
the 1984 Dodge I-ton.
24
Council Agenda - 12/14/98
.
C.
STAFF RECOMMENDA nON:
City staff is anticipating local area truck d alers will be able to meet or beat the state bid
on the truck and we will havc a properly s ecified truck for our use under alternative #2.
We are concerned about buying a pickup fi om a dealer 300 miles away on the statc bid
which also does not meet our requirements. The final recommendations will be available
along with the remaining bids at Monday ening's meeting. The total cost is estimated
at $32,200, which is much less than the $4 ,000 which was budgeted. This is primarily
due to a request from PSG to go to a I-ton ickup rather than a I-ton dual rear wheel
truck with a utility box as was originally p oposed.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of the state bid on the truck from C M Ford in Hallock, Minnesota; Copy of the
quotes for the crane and plow from Cryste 1.
.
.
25
.
.
.
~~"~
CITY OF MO ~TICELLO
TABULA TIO IJ OF BIDS
FOR ONE (1) NEW 1999 ONE- "ON 4 X 4 PICKUP TRUCK
BID OPENING: Monday, D cember 14, 1998: 10 a.m.
LOW BID SECOND BID. THIRD BID
MONTICELLO FORD C & M FORD SALES TENVOORDE FORD
1-94 & Highway 25 Highway 75 North 185 Roosevelt Road
Monticello, MN 55362 Hallock, MN 56728 St. Cloud, MN 56301
VEHICLE DESCRIPTION Phone: (612) 295-2056 Phone: (218) 843-2652 Phone: (320) 251-0540
1999 Ford F350 4 x 4 $23,578.57 $23,802.75 $24,375.72
(Includes Sales Tax) (Includes Sales Tax) (Includes Sales Tax)
Meets All Spec Criteria YES NO YES
.C & M Ford was the state bid
C:\OFFICEuOHNlBIOTAB~ETON.TAB, '2/aI1QQa
-- ----.. ..----- -.-- ..-. -- .... - -
~
.
DEC-01-98 TUE 12:~2 PM C~M FORD
218 943 26~3
P.02
.ti"
(C&M FORD)
.~t'
STATE OF M NNESO~A
OEPARTMENT OF NAT L RESOURCES
EQUIPMENT SPE IFICATION
ITEM:S4
4X4 REGULAR CAB 8FT PICKUP
"
GVWR: 9900
ENGINE, 6. 8L GAS
REAR AXLE: 4.30 LIMITED SLIP
4-SPE~O AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION
DRIVERS SIDE AIR BAG SRS
lNTEGRATED CAB STEPS
AIR CONDITIONING
95 AMP ALTERNATOR
AM/PM RAD:t:O
STANOARD FOLD-AWAY M:tRRORS
ALL T~RRAIN ~IRES
MATCHING SPARE TIRE AND WHEEL
)6 GALLON FUEL CAPACITY
ENGINE BLOCK HBATER
CHROME REAR STEP BUMPER (OEALBR INSTALLXD ACCBFTABLE)
CHROME PLATED FRONT ~UMPER
DAYTIME RUNN!NG LIGHTS
KNXTTED VINYL U~HOLSTERY
SKID PLATES
AUTO LOC1(:z'NG HUBS
FRONT TOW ROOKS
.
PRICE OF ONE(l) UNIT PER ~HE ABOVE SPECIFICATION..._.. .......~.,..,.....S 23.200.00
· PRICE PER MItE FROM DEALER LOCATION TO DELIVERY LOCATION . ( $ . SO '/. 300 -:. 1 s" 0 _
MA1Ol: : FORD :I' ~ <>-0
MODEL: F3S0 4"4 RB:GULAR CAB -:a -e. , i> () ~
S~ )Itl~ \ 4$ e.
t
CRn INCLUJ)E DIESEL .. # 't- ~ ~ (:) -Z
)
ENGINE SIZE::
6.8L VI0
'rIRE SIZE:
LT 265 SSW A-T
I7'J!;M 54A: TRtTCK SAME SPECIF:tCATION AS ITEM NO S4
ENGINE IN LlEU OF GAS
.,s-
-
PRICE: $ 25.250,00
Y'~E: FORD MODEL: F-350 4X4
~ INE SIZE: 7.3L DIESEL
.
,1./.., ,
.
.
.
$ 4,150.00
$ 135.00
S 252,52
S 4,$37.52 . ,
DEC.10.l998 l2:04PM
CRYSTEEL TRUCK EQUIP
NO. 526
612-571-1902
130 73l1D .AVENUE 8QO.79S-1280
IUOLEY, MN. 55432 FAX 612~57]-5091
CRYSTEEL TRUCK
EQUIPMENT
Th\.IIsday, Decer,nber 10, 1998
Jolm Simola
City Of Monticello
250 Ea$t Broadway
~~~ello,~ 55362
Dear John:
Pursuant te) your request for Q.uotation, we are pleased to su it 1te following for your consideration:
*
One (l) Boss Mw:li~positiln1 plow complete to manufacturer's standard specifica.tion$and including;
-9'2" Moldboard
-Independeot operation ofbo1h halves Qfthc moldb llId
-Rapid- Tach II Hitch system.
~Halog~n head1igh1I
~Rubber Snow 'Flap
~In eab controls
-Blectric hydraulic power supply
~Ins1aUer;l. on suitable chwis
)!quipment $ 3,750.00
Installation $ 400.00
Net
This option was taken by the parks department on the last it
Joy Stick Controller in li~u ofrowr switcheg
Sales Tax
Boss Total
The cnmeg we bave 4 options
See Li~ture for differences or give me a call
L.21-7
L-21W-7 ..
Econo- Ton II
P.l
1'1- z."
.
.
.
DEC. 10. 1998 12:04PM
~
Auto Crane
CRYSTEEL TRUCK EQUIP
EconO- T on IlR
NO. 526
$ 3,051.00
P.2
In ion ohny above $ 375.00
Deb1ch ble jack leg $ 1 (i5.oo
~5'q, ~L
""'1 '2. ~ a -
Should. you have any further quesQ0D.5 or concerns, lease do not h~ to amtacl: me directly,l remain
r7'r \t R t. A~\E '""fo~itt.' t/: '0 e 2.4 ~.!- ... t
J
Sincerely,
Davt4 Pomphm
Municipal Sales
'''-~
:--
'i:f
I
.
>f<
.
t
d'~
rf: (~
If
~
.
MMl21
Crysteel Truck Equipment
11307310 Ave NE Hwy 60 E
Fridley. MN. 5!i432 Lake Crystal, MN
(612) 571.1902 (507) 7213-6041
1-800-795-1280 1. eOO-7'22-0SM
.,...(t':
II!IIII~~ (''''If
.1.... ~'fl.(t'A,j~,.,
... an 1M'" wl_ ., III" (WI' 1'411'" '" ./II"l
tt ~f/I. ~IW ('.'1, ., 'M
I
......
..
It .... ('-<1.1
,~ II'
~, 'f' (1'''''')
........
l':~
.'
" 1/. ~'oUJ
:/<
EellnllTnn IIR
l:;'or tbe uamp of your lleat-est
distributor, call TOlL flUX 1..
Crane
-2~97.fO.
A.. l!!~58!!!!'~K!!! O~!1N
Phone: 1918) 438-27(10' FlIX: (91B) a
htlp:l /wvIw..utoCroInQ.COfTl
Features:
. 2,000 Ibs. l;.apacity at 3' 3"
(1.0 m)
· Manual boom extends from
3' 3" (1.0 m) to 5' 2" (1.6 m)
optional lUl1nual boom
extends from 4' 2 1/2"
(1.3111) to l' 1" (2.2 m)
. 3250 man1,lal rotation;
optional 3550 power
rotation (Ton IIR)
· 'IWo boom elevations
(170 and 5(0)
· 10ft. (3 m) removable '\
t:eluote control pendan l
· Swivel block with hook
with latch
. 12 'Jolt DC, pennaneut
magnet, 3/4 hp motor
. Ol'tionalllO volt AC for
lnanual rotation only
. Optional relay kit for HD
applications
· lMRQN@ ~ooo paint
(Auto Crane White)
SPECIFICAnONS:
WeiJht: 208 Ibs. (93 !qj&) ror
" 2" boom: 232 lOll. (105 kgs)
fOT 7' 1" boom
Lmgth: 3' 3" . 5' 2" (1.0 m - l.() m)
for 5' 2" boom: 4' 1 112" - 7' I"
(1.28 m - 2.16 m) fm- 7' 1" bOOM
widlh: ) 1" (.27 m)
Beiglu: 5' J" (1.6 m)~ for " 2" boom;
<f' 2 112" " l' I" (1.~6 m - 2.10 Iu)" fo
7' 1" boom.. .
Base PllI\l; Dime'n!;ians:}
1'" ),' (.31I1x3 m)
Cable Specs: 25 [t, (1.62 m) of
3/16" (5 mm) aircraft q\.llllilY cable.
Ballery InfOl'lIlation; 500 cold. el'IInking
Tll~in&, 100 minule Tt5tTVC capaci~y fIlaint
nance type Muery requtrtd [or 12 volt
opemllon; 50 !\Jnp minimum truck altern
tor required
bWxH folded POSitiOn: l' 11112" x
3' 10 516" (.6 m x 1.18 m)
Long Boom: l' 11 In" x 10 112" II
5' 101/6" (.6 m ^.3 m x 1.48 m)
* Ton IlR is 3" (1,62 c:m) taller than
Ton U. Height shown Is for Ton 11.
,c.f-~
.
15.
.
.
Consideration of urchasin the Daniel
adjacent to the City's biosolids facility.
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGRO
Council Agenda - 12/14/98
at 1705 Coun Road 39
As you know, the City of Monticello pure ased a 158-acre farm from Kenny Bohanon
and his wife in March of 1996. We have een using the property for biosolids application
from the City's wastewater treatment facil ty since that time. This has worked out quite
well for us and the farmer leasing our pro erty. In fact, this year the bean and corn crops
wcre outstanding. Since we began operati ns at the farm, we have not had a singlc
complaint.
The Daniel James property is located on 0 r north property line on County Road 39. It is
centered in our property and surrounded 0 three sides by the biosolids facility. The
existing brick home originally belonged t Kenny Bohanon's mother after she relocatcd
from the old farmhouse on our property. he City rents out this old farm home for $600
per month. The James' home occupies a ne-acre site, and there is an additional one-acre
attached to it on the east side. Mr. James pproached us shortly after we bought the
biosolids facility and asked if he would be able to purchase some additional land from us
to raise horses. I informed Mr. James that we really weren't interested in selling this land
as we needed all of it for biosolids applica ion and setback distances. Mr. James
approached the City this summer and indi ated that he was thinking of selling his home
and relocating to another state. Mr. Jame currently is co-owner of the Lakeland
Transmission facility located in the Monti ello Industrial Park. Mr. James asked whether
or not the City would be interested in pur hasing his home since he thought at the time he
may have some difficulty in selling the ho e since we surround him on three sides with
our biosolids facility. 1 asked Mr. James hat he thought his home was worth, and he
indicated he thought is was worth around 145,000. I told Mr. James I would discuss this
at an upcoming City staff meeting and get back to him.
At the City staff level, we decided we sho ld find out additional information about the
property and obtain our own appraisal. e did so in late June of this year at a cost of
$285, and the appraisal indicated that the orne, containing 1,790 square feet plus a 788
square foot garage, was in good condition with no functional obsolescence or deferred
maintenance noted. The appraised value f the property was $140,099 using the cost
approach and $143,743 using the sales co parison approach. Our appraiser also noted
that "there may be some minor resistance in the market resulting from the proximity to
the biosolids sewage site." This means th t not everybody would be willing to purchase a
house surrounded by a biosolids facility.
We then discussed the appraisal with Mr. James and indicated that staff was supportive of
the purchase of his property and we woul bring the recommendation forward through
the budgeting process, which would be c mplete in December, and then bring it to the
26
Council Agenda - 12/14/98
.
City Council for their consideration. 'rhe tinds of $143,743 are allocated in the sewer
access fund budget for 1 999. The City Ad inistrator has prepared a spreadsheet
indicating the cost of the property assumi g we rent it out.
B. AL TERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. The first alternative would be to of] er to purchase the property from Mr. James at
the appraised value of$]43,743 ba ed upon a sales comparison approach.
2. The second alternative would be to oiTer to purchase the property at the appraised
value of $140,099 based upon the ost approach.
3. The third alternative would be to m ke an oiTer on the property of some other
dollar value.
4. The fourth alternative would be to ot consider purchasing the property.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
.
It is the recommendation of the City Admi istrator and Public Works Director that the
City Council authorize purchasing this pro erty from Mr. James as outlined in
alternatives #1 or #2. There are benefits to us to be able to control our biosolids facility
site entirely. StafTbelieves it would cost u very little to purchase and hang onto this
property. Please refer to Rick's attached s readsheet indicating the cost of purchasing
this 2-acre property and house. We also be ieve that if we don't purchase the property
and Mr. James has difficulty selling it, he ay be returning requesting compensation.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of spreadsheet regarding cost of hold ng property; Copy of sections of the
appraisal; Copy of map showing location.
.
27
.
COST AN LYSIS
ACQUISITION OF J MES PROPERTY
(based on appr ised value)
Cost of funds ($143,000 x 5% interest) =
$7,150/yr
Real estate taxes (current year - homestead classi lcation) =
$1,430/yr
Maintenance allowance
$l.OOO/yr
COST OF ACQUISITION - 1ST YEAR =
$9,580
12
$798/mo
Real estate taxes - non-homestead estimate =
$1,925/yr
COST OF ACQUISITION - 2ND YEA & THEREAFTER =
$10,025/yr
12
$840/mo
. If the home can be rented for $800/month in 1999 nd $850/month thereafter, rental income
should cover our holding cost of buying property. It is anticipated that this property should be
able to generate $900-$1,OOO/month rent and addit onal rental income above expenses ean help
start repaying actual purehase cost.
.
KARENIOFFICEIRICKIJAMES.PRP: 12/11/98
IS-'
.
.
.
APPRAISAL OF EAL PROPERTY
Daniel Jarres Property
1705 Count Road #39
Monticello, Mi esota 55362
Bradley R.
icense #4000117
R.A. Field & sociates
"TOTAl R IPDfIIs.e.1 ,,;)ftw.~ bV .. 111 mode Inc. 1 (000) 328-6a25
'"
IS .. 2-
",lion
~fED SITE V #..LvI:
UNIFORM RESIDENTIAL
" 8 ___ -.25,J1Q
PPRAISAL REPORT File No.
Comment. on Co.t Appro.ch (.uch .s. .ource ot co.t estimate. .ite
value. square toot caiculation and for HUD. V A and FmHA, the
e.timated remaining economic life of the property):
,MATE.D REPRODUCTION COST.N,EW.OF IMPROVISMENTS:
.
..AIng_--.L~O Sq, Ft n --.70.....Q0_ . 8 _-----125..,.-3Jlli
b3.~t--.L'Z2Q Sq, Ft .8--.1.0_,-.Q9_" _,_J.:L...9~
, Willt-.Li.n.LpatiQ[shedLIDi:b- " __--.l5,~O-
,G"B""IC.""," _..2eli Sq. Ft, IS J2.-,-OiL " __-.2,456-
~ :: EBtim...d Co" ;~, F,,,.,I.,,,.I ~~m.1 ..J94656-
rl; Pepred~tion _. .---5~a,81l""_",_,~""._"L..6,,TI
rl~ Depreclatocl ValUe of ImproWimenta
Ij ;~~'Cv~~~~ :~~:~~';OST APPROACH
ITEM Sl)~~ COMPARABl..E NO,~
1705 Cbunty Read #39 10849 Dalton Ave NE
~:~::~'__ ~ oWI~ ~~~Rlli_ 6-0
. -..-'-'-' 8.'.-.. ---nit 8 23' 74 r/J '1/77~"T.m~
Prlot/GroM."Uv, .A:r~~.. __ ._,. ._. .,,_.~- t_.. ,-,,~~
D... """'0' pers inspctn MLB Sold Data
~rillclllIonsou~_ ~L~Q.t..ioo...
_V".1-~~",,~STMEN~ ~ESCAIP'TION .. .._l +...!:!1,Adj"~.nl
s....o' FIn."""'" conventional,
_Co"",,"""'....!... _ __ ~ts.... ----
_.D~.!!.~t SBIe~. . .__ QU2.6L91...LGlL. "'- .-.
~tIo~__ __ _M:1D.ti...c;ello-. M2nticclm....- - -
LB...!...hoid'F.. Sim.E'!... .fee-- ._ ._fee-- ._ _.__n'_
. SII...__ ___ _'2&/iJYSJ- :r\.JJ&J. 2...s.L9d-c.reek..:..., -l4...QQ
Vle~ _. _ _ ave;t;'~--=-,,-- ..aye~_.._~..,~OOO
_~s!l1"~nd~...!'... _.~e:dayg-- r:;;urib1.eti.aY9-.---
Qu'!'!.?' .Cons""cIIoo_ -9-CQi...---. ..gccl..-- .~.--.-
~_ __ (l9..6.71.... _2-0 ~81.L....lO-,-.-5..,O 0
.~- --- -..gs::x:d---
_!.Ol~! __-'- Bd~~ .'.. ~.~th!;l
TE.!.;!.I :._~_!!...:" P!!b.:!;
~.~~_..."-,,.-~_._..-_._.-.-.__._-
-...-...-..-..--..--.,-.....-.---.-".-.. -'-
~tLoool~f>~ em;..i@..ted.....<'\t..JJOL..-
-.-...-,..--...-.--.....-..-....-.-.-....-.. .-'.--
. Ext;;~otml,gf>Q...~~:ijT\3.ted..a,LOl-L -
_rn.irP~oboo~~ce....f-t.Q!l ImJXirrri.t~ illJ:,j.Q_ .
,.f!Qlid ..liguid-~...&w;tre.~catiO!L....
.",s.:i.te.- .-'- ---- - -----
P ical obsol sc ce estimated at 25%
_.,~~~!.--,,-
9530 Gillard Ave NE
. !'1:;;>I.lti.ceUo __ _ l'1;;!nt.icello__
WI~~~- 36~O-~N~~--7-:cio
.L 102~'U~~~ !...__~5.9J...-,jJ_~
MLB Sold Data MIS sold Data
~SQIJal.~g_ti.Qn- $;rnQ@ ~ct.iQn___
__ [)ESC~IPTIC?~._. l..!...0 ~ Adj~stm.ot ..DE~~T.IC?!!._.. .~(~),,!...~Iu~tm.nl
conventional =nventional
nowiDts___._--l1O-JXl-ints --
..1.Z/.mj~(cl)-.--..- 04JQ3.L28j,gIL . ._u
J'1:n.tiQello-, _ _ _M?nticcllQ..... .--- -.
f~ __ _____ ___..f.ee______"_ ----
_lQi;I&V9-J:ut:.l........::J2..,QQ..0 laLgd_n.J.ml-..eQUiY.
ave:r;~.-. __, ----=-L_PQQ.. aver:,aglL__ .:-.1-, 000..
.. ~erLi:).Y9-~ ..___' split@V9--..- ---
a~tQge.........____+2.,.QOO a~ra~-~. --.
...l19..6..8 L2.5__ ~_ ..:1:.5,DidO __ (12911. .Q.5 ...~-1 0 ,..Q.OO
_i:).~age .j:5,.QQO gpj..
/+bOw Gl'l!Ide
._ ~, ..:..~!.:. EJ.!t_tt).I
.
AoomCo"ol _6"':';;'-1~ 6 3 1.75 6 3 1.75
_G<o" LMoo A'!".... __:).J9~Ft ._J. ,32~, F,--,._+6......93..0..--- ..._L 63_6 S.'L!L__ J2,3.10
a'8Om.ol & Flnllhod full full full
Room' eolow "'.<!!..... pQrti.<4-firL.L~-:t-J:lQtJL.... -=-6 ,.QQ-Q tb;r::e~_ + _.m.ili--= 6.....Q.Oo..._
Funetlon_~I.Y''''' _ _ a~l;"Qge........- .QYeBga....._~.---a~Qge.-. ---- -
--,:!!"~-"':!ll_ _ ..ENU?/r:b-- t:lILLP.Ln~-....i:l.J)Q.Q....EA/WIr;:p..-~----
~""_'l!r_E-ollI.m~-- ....i:lve@gsl..- ~tQg~-,-.,-. aW@gsl....-.---'-.--- aver:.",ge-.---.-- .n -
_G~ICB'po"---.. t1!&.. aLtQ,Ql1ed~-a,m~-- _Q,P....atta.cbed.:......- ---- tbn~e......at..t_<>ch----=- 2.,.QOo.__
Po"'", PBIIo, Docl<, patio large dip -3,00 deck/patio -1,000 deck/patio -1,000
~1'OO(~!c.!Ic,--. _. _2 EP ___ __EP--- ._--'-- .....:!:.2,.Q0 1JQIle....------'- ....:t4 ....oomne-. .-.-- .'--- HeJ Q1)P
F.""", P",,', ''''_ miLrmLf@re mne___~;t;L,QO sheds.Lfill<::e--- ~-' 0.0.0.. .ronen-' _____+J..,OOO.
_.______._ 2 i w..l'al'lCeS-,----=-Z..illl. l'al'lCe.Sc-.' "'-. ~Jli. O. ...... cas.,._.. .-....J.,2.0.0'
~IAdj,("'I.II"__ + .-'$$-1.149-, 91 $__....5..,130 + -:L_l3..&9JL
Adll.lsled s,lefi, PI'Ioo
01 Compo,.b" $_14),. 1 0 $ --.11:hJI0_
Comm.n.. 00 ..... Comp.nson (I,""udlng .... oubjaol p",porti. oomp.'b1111y '" .... nBlghbomood, "'.j' '.the_ ..Sl.Jbie.ct_pm:erty'--is.-ccm;:>atible.
. tQ._ the..neighl::Q:r;b;;Q;i in1:W-a@..tQdaSi9n-,-.llBt iill.s _~J1,LTTN~.tab..ility....~CSQre rn;inm: ---
.ert.e.ma:LQl2SQ~GeDca.. 'lmJ_uo_tcl....._ lID.aOjill3tIT . for....Yie..W _is@defQr--mooidl2ratiQo gf .-
extgu@l_Q!':~IeQ.Cenc.e..,---~.. Qirec;;tiDn__Q:L..f!di- J:l"'ellta....iQ.-~ .:mdt.b~U,\Jbj~t _is_.bra_d~e_t.i2d_~..
Eqlli:l.L~igh.t...i_S.JL1.~orLall..t.~e Q:JJJpS......Tb .....fiml...Yall,le__is_well _mlw:>rt..l2<Lby-<>U threa
's is rt of a linri.t ssi.gnm"l1t. . .---'---'-
ITEM SUBJECT COMPARABLE NO. 2, ~~.~~.~BLE t:J~~
DB", pnos.nd DB" n/a no previous sales no previous sales
so"",", to< pM, ..10. reported in last rep:>rted in last
. WI,I>In YO" ol.pp'...., 1 t ,J~hs ,-.-'-'
M'tyota 01 ."f ",,'''01 .groam.ol 01 ...., opllol\, 0' IIsIIng 01 .... aub)BOl property .nd .naly~. 01 p,,",' ..... 01 oubjaol .nd ""mp"Bblo' wlthlo OM yo.r 01 tho dB" 01 BPP"'"''
...1.his ..f!wr:a.LsaL~i.i~sscl...t..Q...J;l:1a.. Ci_tJLof..J12D icel.lQ....foc. tbLi,nL~e_-Qf-f(l3k:i.ng-a--
~12 _decisi9n.-- _tl;J Qthe.r-Il:>:::eY:iQJJfL.Sales....'#. birLtre....last.Qlle~ ~l:Q~OLccm::u;al12s ,---
INDICATED VALUE BY SALES COMPARISON APPROACH 8 - ___1.43,713
INDICATED VALUE BY INCOME APPROACH (II Applleab", E.,,,,.I.d MB""I A. 18 a " 8 n a
.
~~M llWi I!Ipprll1881 i!J, ma""
;0: Co...1ionO 01 Ap"""",,, 'Ibis awrai.sal.i.$.@~ Sl.Jb;ie.cL_t. theEJEEEA-AddendurrLatta.cbed... ....11le.... fiDaLV<!1ua.
~i ...is....m.illcb:tJ.i..tQ,iI)e.......n~@;~si-..sL...QQQ...m;::!!'U::,he" '~gLsQ..les.....~i!:'>9n-awroocb-,--- ---- n__ -
'1:: FIn.1 A"":"",,,,1Io0: _'Ibain~aw.~ch..~mt~m .o...l~..cl..wffici.~m~_wit:.h-'tlhich-t:O-JO;rnl. i.i_.
ibl\ _~.1lLY<!lu.e......estl.@.ta.-The- d:i~c:;:L@l.es.... _nl-.QQn-aw.r:Q;l.ch-.l.fLl;g,).~m t.Qgff~tbe__
'go 1'~]..,1, ,_-'1, t' f ._1 ~~-'1 t . ht ' 't W 11- -.+ed by t h
~ ~~~~,:;:;;=~.::..;~~ ~~_'e' ;..,;;;'~~-;;;~;';;' e_~ ;,;:"..:;;..;. ..=..=~..
oondIlIo,"" .nd m.""1 VB". dollnllloo th., B'. .....d '0 tho ...onod F_ MBe I'oom 409/F. 010 M.. Foom 1004" (R'~8Od J1JI.le_192_3 ).
I(WE)ESTI ETHEMARKETVALUE,ASDEFINED,OFTHEREALPROPE TVTHATlSTHESUBJECTOFTHISREPORT,ASOF .J:J.JU12_ 23" .199!i..
(WHICH IS HE DJ. E NSPECTlON AND THE EFFECTIVE DATE OFTHIS REPORT) TO BE $ -..- _14!L Q.QO__._..
APPRAISER ta, . eld SUPERVISORY APPRAISER (ONLY IF REQUIREO): .- -
S~"!'!..._----'-----' 'I~.r!........--. ___ ----- - - L 1 Old LJ oldNol
N.m.~:G;\<; _....E' NBm.._.._.._..__ ._.__._.'_" - .- - '0- p",porty
~.. A.port 81g""",_J c::I12J-lli-L--.-.---- ~ A.port 8'9.."""________. -..-.-.- ---
~..c."""'"IIo"-!.--40..Q.01l7--.--.-_-,---~..I.t:!ll. S",!~IIon...!.....__ ___._.____._S...!!...-- -.
'" S.... UcBnso . 4 0 1 S"" '" SIBI. UcBnso . S"'.
F,._ M.o Fom1 70 B-93 F.nn" MB. Fom11004 6.93
''TOTAl"BPp,.,,",lsoIIW.,. .1.modo,lnc. HOO.ALAMOOe I#'. ~...
PA E 2 OF 2 ~ ....... fiiI
In'"
".'.
r BUILDING SK -TCH
GROSS LIVING AREA = /111D SF GARAGE(S) = ~ SF
. BASEMENT ( 100 %) = 1,710 SF PORCH (ES) = N?~ SF
CRAWL SPACE ( () %) = N(),J5 SF DECK(S) = ~SF
SLAB ( 0 %) = NoNE:. SF PATIO(S) = /00 SF
OVERHANG ( D %) = m,J;, SF OUTBLDGS = NcN€ SF
. 41' .
1 13'
25'
BEDROOOM r c'. IL.v."~1
BEDROOM DINING ROOM 17 .
KITCHEN L.AlJNDRY
16'
BATHROOM
36' LIVING ROOM 24' 36'
.
BEDROOM GARAGE
6'
8 ' 32' 5'
'--- -
16' 25'
,
.
,~ ~ t.J
PHOTOGRAPH DDENDUM
.
.
..; ,: r~~~ ' ~,";,~j
i;
.
FRONT OF
SUBJECT PROPERTY
.
REAR OF
SUBJECT PROPERTY
STREET SCENE
/~-~
.
.
.
(
I
-. . n J
r Site P a
300
m
"2..~'Z
,
.
1
300
300)< m = .~ 'q/L{OO := Z. os Ac
l '35(.,0
~
I I~
--- --
--
-"
N
o
o
,,'
J~
~l
i
',:\~
"
<,
.'
l' .,~
.
/,
,.'t~ '
:;~
\-
\'
...
.~ ~:' :>:f' .\'
~,*':.i'
""I. ~ '
i~J~
l< ~
-<> N
.... [I .J>
:-l
.t>.
"\
"\,'1",'
. -:ji~
':'~'.;;~,: .
tS;r7
.
.
.
16.
Consideration of sala
A.
REFERENCE AND BACKGRO D:
Council Agenda - 12/14/98
(R.W.)
As part of the on-going maintenance of 0 current salary system in use for all non-union
employees, the City Council should annu lly review the salary schedule and make
adjustments in order to retain the City's p y relationship to the market. With Monday's
meeting being the last scheduled meeting efore 1999, adjustments to the salary schedule
should be adopted by the COlmcil at this eeting in order to allow for implementation of
the new schedule by the first payroll in J uary.
In preparation for the 1999 budget, I agai included an additional 5% in the salary budget
for potential cost of living adjustments an any other position adjustments or revisions
that may be necessary due various job eh ges.
This amount should be sufficient to cover any increases being considered. This does not
mean that the Council is obligated to a 5<Yc increase, but it is to let you know that there
should be sufficient funds available to co er the adjustments the Council may feel are
warranted. As we have done in the past, i is recommended that the increase be reflective
of the cost ofliving increases that are occ rring in our area that other employers have
granted and comparable to increases other communities may have used to keep us
competitive with the market in surroundin communities.
As you may recall, our present comparabl worth base system was adopted by the City
Council in 1991 in order to comply with t e new comparable worth pay law that was in
efTect at that time. Our present program i eludes 22 grades with 6 potential steps within
each grade that all City employees could II within. Since our current pay system
allowed for step increases by employees ho may not have reached the maximum step of
their grade, the Council does not necessarily have to be concerned with individual
merit/performance adjustments but really eeds to address what percentage increase
would be appropriate for the entire salary chedule in general. Most communities we
surveyed make adjustments to their salary schedule in a like manner by adjusting the
entire schedule by a certain percentage ually. In the City of Buffalo, adjustments do
occur under a two-step process whereby a ortion of the increase is granted to the pay
system in general, while an additional per entage is allowed for merit or performance
based on evaluations. Since this type of p y system makes it more difficult to always be
in compliance with the comparable worth aw, most communities simply adjust the salary
schedule as a whole once it is determined hey do comply with comparable worth law.
In the past, the Council has used the Minn apolis/St. Paul consumer price indexes as the
current int1ationary rate for the metro area A current CPIU, consumer price index for
urban consumers, is at 1.5% on an annual asis. The Minneapolis/St. Paul indexes only
calculate twice a year for annual purposes, and this 1.5% increase covers the time period
from June 1997 to June 1998. Likewise, t e USCPIU as of October 1998 is also at 1.5%.
In addition to the CPI information, we als have conducted a brief survey again of
various surrounding communities, includil g the cities of Big Lake, Buffalo, Elk River,
Maple Grove, and Plymouth. These are th same communities we have surveyed in the
past, and this information can be helpful fi r the Council to see what is happening in other
28
Council Agenda - 12/14/98
.
communities around us. At the time of this survey, some communities have not
established salary adjustments for next year and you may note that most are proposing or
have received around 31)10. As additional in ormation, I have also enclosed a history of
recent years' salary adjustments adopted by the Council compared to the reported CPT
increases for those particular years.
As you may recall, the original intent of ke ping our comparable worth plan up to date
was to take a look at all the job description every 3-5 years for possible amendments to
bring the job descriptions up to date on wh t actually is occurring in each position.
During 1998, a proposed reorganization pI was approved by the Council that accounted
for some additional job classification chan es including a retitling of the Assistant
Administrator to Deputy City Administrato , reclassification of the Office Manager
position to the Deputy City Clerk, realign ent of some finance positions to a separate
department under the control of the City A ministrator, and inclusion of the various new
positions that have been added such as Co munity Development Secretary, Building
Inspections Clerk, and Clerical Administra ive Assistant positions. I am currently also in
the process of reviewing a few additional j b descriptions to determine whether
modifications are warranted in the area of t e Finance Assistant/MIS Coordinator,
Building Official/Zoning Administrator cat gory and Construction Inspector
classifications. While these reviews are no necessarily a factor the Council needs to
address at this time in regard to salary adju tments to our pay scales, I wanted the Council
to be aware of the ongoing review that is 0 curring.
.
As far as the last three union contract rene als, language in the contract makes
adjustments to the union's pay scale based n the same percentage increase that is granted
to non-union employees except that the uni n is granted a minimum of 1/2% annually. In
the earlier agenda item on union contract g atification, you may recall that the union
contract proposed a 3% increase effective prill, 1998, which was similar to the
increase previously granted by the Council in January. This concept has been beneficial
in one respect in that it allows us to make s re that the comparable worth law is being
complied with by assuring us that one barg ining group doesn't receive increases that
may put the comparable worth plan out of ompliance.
The following factors, which have been no ed in previous years, are important items to be
remembered by the Council when conside ng pay scale adjustments.
1.
The comparable worth study adopt din 1991 had originally recommended that
each grade consist of seven steps fr m bottom to top ofthe wage scale. The
seven-step system was recommend d by the League of Minnesota Cities
personnel consultant and was base on the average metro/rural steps used by other
communities with similar pay syste s. At the time of adoption of the new pay
system, the Council made the decis on to drop the Th step, which in effect reduced
the potential salary structure ofthe ity by a little over 4%. Since the original
recommendation was intended to k ep us consistent with the market for our area,
the Council had, in effect, immedi ely m~de a reduction in our market study by
4%.
.
29
Council Agenda. 12/14/98
With many of our employees havi g worked for the City for more than five years,
many of the positions are now at 0 nearing the top of their steps within their
present grade. As a result, many 0 our employees will be relying on cost of
living adjustments as the only incr ase in their salary unless their job descriptions
or duties change sufficiently to wa ant a move to a different step or grade.
2.
.
3. In order to have our wage scales fo city positions keep in line with the market of
surrounding governmental jurisdic ions, it appears that adjustments in the area of
3% are the norm.
4. While a consumer price index fro the metro area may not be perfect, it is a basis
that has been used by the City Co cil in the past in an attempt to keep our pay
structure in line with inflation.
5. The Monticello School District is i the second year of a contract for the teachers
that averaged over 4% per year. T is past summer, secretaries and cooks within
the School District received a two- ear adjustment of2% the first year and 3% for
the second year. I'm not exactly s re what type of adjustments have accrued for
other school administrative person el, which is handled separately from the two
contracts noted above.
Council could establish a cost of Ii ing adjustment for the pay scale that would
apply to the entire non-union pay ystem that is in line with the Minneapolis/St.
Paul CPI. According to my curre t information, which is through June 1998, the
percentage increase is approximat ly 1.5%. ~sjY
Council could adjust the cost of Ii ing based on some other factor in addition to
the CPI index and in line with adj stments being requested or proposed in other
surrounding communities. This p rcentage, according to our survey, would be
approximately 3%.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
.
1.
2.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
After reviewing the survey information 0 surrounding communities regarding proposed
or actual salary adjustments being schedu ed for 1999, and based on the CPI information
that is available, it would be my recomme dation that the Council adjust the salary
schedule pay system at around 2.5% to 30 o. My recommendation is based more on
attempting to keep in line with the market conditions of surrounding communities rather
that solely basing it on the CPI index.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
.
Salary survey of surrounding communitie ; Prior years' salary schedule adjustments.
30
.
.
.
SURVEY OF SURRO NDING CITIES
1999 PROPOSED SALA Y ADJUSTMENTS
Big Lake:
1998: 3%
1999: Requesting 3%
1998: 2.5% + $.25/hr for each hour
1999: Proposing 1.3% increase + up to an add'l
1 % for merit/performance
Buflalo:
Elk River:
1998: 3%
1999: Requesting 3 % increase
Maple Grove:
1998: 3%
1999: 3 % ($20 for increase health insurance)
Plymouth:
1998: 3%
1999: 3%
OFFICElKARENISALARY.SUR: 12/8/98
Iii "" ,
.
.
.
PREVIOUS YEARS'S ALARY SCHEDULE
ADJUST \-tENTS
For Year: Reported C I Increase Council Adjustments
1993 3.2 Yo 2.5%
1994 3.7 to j.8% 3.5%
1995 2.9 to L1% 2.5%
1996 2.7 Vo 2.7%
1997 3.1 to 5.3% 3.1%
1998 2.7 )/0 3%
1999 1.5 )/0 ? 2.S'%:
KARENIQFFICEIRICKIPRIQRYR.ADJ: 12/8/98 /(,-
--.., ".------- ....-...- 00._ ._
z...,
.
.
.
17.
Consideration of a re uest for an amen
within the PZM Zonin District and a
boundaries. A licant: Monticello-Bi
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGRO
Council Agenda 12/14/98
ment t a Conditional Use Permit PUD
endments to Hart Boulevard street vacation
ake Communi Hos ital District. (NAC)
The Monticello-Big Lake Community Hos ital District is requesting approval of an
amendment to their PUD which would alte the street vacation pattern along the west
portion of Hart Boulevard from the propos d Hospital entrance to the Dental Clinic
property. To accommodate the change, th Hospital's entrance canopy, already under
construction, would violate front yard setb cks and require a variance.
The Planning Commission recommended pproval of the PUD, vacation, and variance
request. Since there was no appeal of the ariance request, the decision stands as
rendered by the Planning Commission.
The original Hospital PUD planned for a v cation of Hart Boulevard from the Hospital
campus eastern boundary to Hart Boulevar 's intersection with County Highway 75 on
the west. The City granted the Hospital pe mits to begin grading and foundation
construction although the Hospital had not omplied with all of the terms of the PUD
approval, namely, the requirement that all arcels affected by the vacation agreed in
writing to accept access easements from th Hospital in lieu of public street frontage.
The Dental Clinic refused to cooperate, ev n though it was staffs opinion that there was
little, if any, difference between the easem nt rights and the right-of-way access. Any
difference would be legalistic since the physical street improvements would be identical
under either scenario.
Nonetheless, without the Dental Clinic's a proval, the City required the 110spital to
provide an indemnification to the City in th event the Dental Clinic decided to sue for a
taking. It was the City's position that even though the City would likely prevail in such a
suit, the costs of defending itself should be orne by the Hospital, the originator ofthe
request. This requirement has been unacce table to the Hospital District; and as a result,
the issue of the right-of-way has been umes lved. In the meantime, the Hospital has been
allowed to continue with its construction pr ~ect in anticipation of compliance with the
original and amended PUD approvals.
To resolve the Dental Clinic access issue, tl e Hospital is now asking for a revision to its
vacation request which leaves the Hart Bou evard right-of-way in place from the new
Hospital entrance drive to the Dental Clinic With all other Hart Boulevard right-of-way
in the Hospital campus area to be vacated, t e remaining right-of-way would be an
"island" of public street. The Hospital is su sequently asking for approval of a
dedication of the proposed entrance to Cou ty 75 as City street as well, providing the
connection to Hart Boulevard.
31
Council Agenda 12/14/98
.
This resolution, however, creates another is ue--that of setback. The entrance canopy
would encroach to the edge of the right-of- ay, reducing the required 3D-foot setback to
zero. The location of the entrance canopy as of no concern under the original approval
since the plan for vacation of Hart Boulev eliminated the front yard issues in this area.
Under the revised proposal, the City is bein asked to waive its setback standards to
accommodate the Hospital's unwillingness 0 indemnify the City against the Dental
Clinic's taking claim. However, the City w'll still require a maintenance agreement for
this portion of street and an indemnificatio against claims which are based on inadequate
design or maintenance since the remaining ortion of Hart Boulevard would not be built
to City standards, and the Hospital will ass me responsibilities for maintaining it as if it
were a private driveway. Additional inde ification would be needed since the helipad
would now site on public right-of-way.
It should be emphasized that there is no pr posed change to the physical design or
operation of the project under the PUD am ndment. The change is only to the
arrangement of public street and private pr perty in the project and the procedural
approvals necessary to accommodate the r arrangement.
.
A final note regarding setback variances: he City had approved a front yard setback
variance to the medical clinic adjacent to t e Hospital for a similar entrance canopy
concept although not to zero feet. This ap roval would provide some precedent to the
Hospital's request, except that the varianc was granted in anticipation of the eventual
vacation of Hart Boulevard, negating the s tback violation issue. There is some question
as to whether the City would have granted approval for the construction of the canopy at
issue ifno vacation ofthe street right-of-w y was to occur. It should also be pointed out
that the entrance canopy does not appear 0 the site plans presented to the City. It was
not until staff had the opportunity to revie the change in the vacation request and
compare that request to the construction p ogress that the encroachment problem was
identified.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
Decision 1:
1.
Motion to recommend approval 0 the PUD amendment altering the plan for
vacation and street dedication on t e Hospital campus subject to the approval of a
setback variance for the entrance canopy, and subject to a maintenance agreement
and indemnification for design an maintenance of the remaining right-of-way,
and subject to indemnification for hazards associated with operation of a helipad
on City right-of-way, based on a nding that the physical and operational
characteristics ofthe Hospital PU do not change under the revised PUD. This
motion would incorporate previo sPUD approval conditions and would include
the option for the Hospital to cont nue to seek written Dental Clinic approval or
the indemnification concept appr ved previously.
.
32
.
Council Agenda 12/14/98
Approval of the PUD is also subject to the requirement that Hart Boulevard be
vacated at such time that the Dental Clinic comes under the ownership of the
Hospital District.
Motion to recommend denial of the UD amendment based on a finding that the
previous approvals are still valid an offer the Hospital the opportunity to provide
written approvals of the affected pr perty owners or an indemnification for claims
made due to the vacation of Hart Boulevard to accommodate the Hospital project.
2.
3. Motion to table action on the PUD endment subject to the provision of
additional information.
Decision 2: Variance to front yard setb ck - No action is requested by Council on
this item-approved by the tanning Commission on 12/1/98.
1. Motion to approve the variance to fr nt yard setback requirements from the
required 30 feet to zero feet subject 0 the City Council's approval of the PUD
amendment, based on a finding that he variance does not alter the ultimate design
of the project and that there is prece ent in the Hospital campus area for similar
setback considerations.
.
Motion to deny the variance to front yard setback requirements based on a finding
that there does not appear to be actu I physical hardship in complying with the
requirements as demonstrated by th original and amended Hospital PUD
approvals.
2.
3. Motion to table action on the varian e subject to the submission of additional
information.
c. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Approval of the proposed PUD amendment necessitates approval of the setback variance
due to the configuration of the existing imp ovements. The variance does not appear to
meet the City's test for variance approval a stated in the Zoning Ordinance. The need
for the variance is an economic considerati n--the Hospital does not wish to absorb the
liability of indemnifying the City against a uit brought by the Dental Clinic under the
full vacation of Hart Boulevard. Moreover, the change adds the complication of placing
the helipad within the City's right-of-way, potential concern.
Without the traditional variance findings, st ffis reluctant to recommend approval of the
variance or the PUD amendment which is c nditioned on it. However, as is noted in the
report, there will be no physical change to te project under either scenario. The
Planning Commission may wish to approve the proposed revisions on the basis that the
changes are a reasonable accommodation fi r a project which is of significant impact on
the community.
.
33
Council Agenda 12/14/98
.
As noted earlier, Planning Commission ap roved the varaiance and recommended
approval of the PUD/vacation pattern base on the findings above and supplemental
comments noted in the attached meeting inutes.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Exhibit A - Proposed Site Plan
Exhibit B - Master Plan
Exhibit C - Draft of Planning Commissio Minutes
.
.
34
'-' ~
...J 1-'.
Ai) u:l W - .....J
<..)~:z<
fi t=.....: ~ !:::
'"" :z .....J :::: fu
05:200
~OJ<..):C
.
~ ..'
I(>~
( .'.
..., .
"""'-"~;'.,:
I
/~l~'" .
iJ
I'
/. .
'.'
.'
.-./~~~\:
I \ ,
.~ L
" ;:[
'-_/
"
"--.
" .~
'~~. )
,......;
~~.......':...I/
.i".."
)I i ~1 I'
rI ~ :~~ ~;
.. "'~ ~~\! ]1 'I'
.. ',. ~j; i
il! j ,jjH 111111111111111
ill, II i ,!JJ l
'~.'
C\J
o
C\J
15 1 (
· ,S I ~
JfHli
'.
", ,
~.
.....
I
r
r
;~
r
r'
/
/
/
/
/
~
II. I i I
III \
iil J~ iI
!II ;: II
Ui :; I'
'" 1111111
5 .d ; II
x .. oioi -.I
/
/>
/
. /
/~.,
-'. ~U ./d}-
~ / ft.
1\"" .' 'J#'''~
,. ,,(~ I
" \~_t
:!'( ,. ,fjt:
'./ -....7;.'. :
. . ,"-. .*i :::i
I
I
..: J
'l~/
1Jj~/
L .... i
. ." /
.:' .:-' /
:' ~.!t~ !
I,
Q i i
Q
~~[::J
/
;I
/
~~_.
So!. i~
::c ~J
... .
~
...
....'.,.
/
.,/ a _
/ ~l
I~
..~
I
!
i '
;
.,
:)
~f'
-',
i
,
..~/~ J'
e~
~~
".
EXHIBIT A - SITE PLAN
I?- ,
../
/IJ
./
i/
.....
...........
.....
'-t .,- ~ HI J~illlllllllllllllll \ I
>- .,,,, II
I- ~:a I'
w--l ,.~ Jl1l Ii> Hi
:::c:::z<e 1t g' 'jl << .II
<=>1- (Ie I
-I::::Ea:: ,,~ .....t~ -I III
<.!J:::2:w .t= I 'IS
,.1 .....1lI J Ii HI Ii <<
_00 lll., ~
alO:!: ~.Stl I J ) r
.:I.. . I
-----. ....-------
{'
~ f'.:",
,';"','/'
,f' /.
/
/
,,'/
.,./
.:/
~
~~
,
cS6
"
.......
.
.
.
DRAFT
. - --" ---. ,..-..."." ~'-".._'" ",,---
Planning Commission Minutes - 12/1/98
'''-~~~--_.----=-_.,~._~.._-,., .--..-.
5.
Steve Grittman presented the staff report on he proposed amendment to the PUD. The
original PUD required the vacation of Hart oulevard from the eastern boundary of the
Hospital campus to Hart Boulevard's interse tion with County Road 75 on the west. In
lieu of getting all parties to agree to access e sements instead of frontage on a public
street, the hospital was requested to provide 'ndemnification to the City. While the
parties involved were trying to meet these c nditions, the hospital was allowed to work
on construction of their improvements. It no appears that the hospital will not be able to
meet the original conditions set forth by the City. The Monticello-Big Lake Community
Hospital District is requesting approval of a amendment to their PUD which would
allow them to change the street vacation of art Boulevard so that the Hart Boulevard
from the Hospital entrance to the Dental Cli ic would remain public right-of-way. The
Hospital was also requesting that the propo ed entrance to County Road 75 be dedicated
public right-of-way.
The construction of the hospital improvem nts included a canopy which would have
complied with setback requirements had H Ii Boulevard been vacated as was originally
intended. However with Hmi Boulevard re aining as public right-of-way in this area the
canopy now encroaches into the front yard etback. The Hospital is requesting a variance
of the 30 foot front yard setback to allow t e entrance canopy to extend to the lot line.
Steve Grittman advised the board toconsid r whether denying a variance in this case
would deny the property owner a right given to other property owners. If the Planning
Commission grants the variance it should e noted in the findings of fact that this project
has not changed its physical nature and als that there was some precedent in this area for
setback variances. If the Planning Commis ion approved the variance request, the staff
would recommend approval ofthe amend ent to the PUD. The PUD amendment would
not change the physical design of the proje t. The only difference would be that the
helipad area would be in the public right-o '-way. If the PUD amendment is not approved
the earlier PUD which required the vacatio of Hart Boulevard and indemnification to the
City would be in effect.
Chairman Frie opened the public hearing. Barb Schwientek and Steve Munstenteiger,
attorney for the hospital were present to e plain their request. Barb Schwientek stated
that while the hospital had attempted to co ply with the conditions set forth by the City,
the hospital felt that this proposal was the est way to resolve the problem without
incurring additional costs to the City or to he hospital district. Mr. Munstenteiger added
that complications arise during the course f construction that are not anticipated and he
hoped that the Planning Commission wou d understand the hardship this situation posed
for the hospital. To leave the public right- f-way in front of the dental office was a
reasonable solution since the dental clinic as reluctant to work on an alternate solution
to the problem.
11-3
EXHIBIT C
Planning Commission Minutes - 12/1/98
~.,......".
.
._..,,-~.~_.,.,-~,,-,--~-- ~--,,,.....---' ~~,_._,~,-~---,.---------...............,-_..~.........--
Fred Patch noted that there may be some Ion term effect if the Planning Commission
approves the variance and suggested a possi Ie contingency that could be included. The
contingency would be that if and when the h spital would acquire the dental clinic site,
they would be required to purchase the rema ning public right-of-way of Hart Boulevard.
It was suggested that this condition be attac ed to both the variance request and PUD
amendment. Chairman Frie asked if it was le intent of the hospital district to purchase
the clinic site. Barb Schwientek replied tha while the hospital would be interested in the
land and buildings the were not interested i operating the business. If this acquisition
would take place it would not occur until a ater phase in the hospital development.
Phase I of development would be complete in mid summer or early fall of 1999.
Chairman Frie then closed the public heari g.
Since the helipad area would be in the pub ic right-of-way, Robbie Smith asked about the
frequency of its use. Barb Schwientek replied that the helipad was not used frequently
and since it is the safety zone around the I elipad that would be in the right-of-way area
the hospital didn't feel it would interfere ith the use of the public right-of-way.
.
There was discussion on the access to the ental clinic, the number of accesses the
County would allow onto County Road 7 and proposed plans for improvements to
County Road 75. Richard Carlson questio ed how the vacation of the balance of Bart
Boulevard would impact the Dental Clini and whether a perception of a change in access
because of the street vacation could gene ate any legal implications that the City need to
be concerned with. Steve Grittman respo ded that the location of Hart Boulevard was a
City decision.
Roy Popilek asked how long the hospital knew about the problem and yet allowed
construction to continue. Barb Schwien ek stated that the hospital didn't recognize they
had a problem until the canopy was cons meted. She also noted that since it is the state
and not the city that reviews the buildin plan, the state would not catch an item like a
setback problem. Roy Popilek stated tha he felt like the Planning Commission was being
forced to approve the variance and he w s not comfortable with that.
Steve Munstenteiger stated he felt it wo Id be an invitation to lawsuits if the hospital
indemnified the City and the better alter ative was to leave the right-of-way for the dental
clinic as it is. Chairman Frie asked if th hospital was set on the entrance being locatcd
where thc canopy is. Barb Schwintek r sponded that the location of the entrance was set
up to align with the school entrancc wit the possibility of lights eventually being located
at that area.
.
...,' ..f.....
. ' . ".' ... ." .
"0 _ . . .
. ..
..- ". .
"1- .
. /
.
Planning Commission Minutes - 12/1/98
"~'Jf~
MOTION WAS MADE BY ROBBIE SMI I AND SECONDED BY DICK FRIE TO
RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE PU AMENDMENT ALTERING THE PLAN
FOR V ACA TION AND STREET DEDICA ION ON THE HOSPITAL CAMPUS,
SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF A SE BACK VARIANCE FOR THE
ENTRANCE CANOPY, SUBJECT TO A AINTENANCE AGREEMENT AND
INDEMNIFICATION FOR DESIGN AND MAINTENANCE OF THE REMAINING
RIGHT-OF-WA Y AND SUBJECT TO IF ND WHEN THE HOSPITAL SHOULD
ACQUIRE THE DENTAL CLINIC SITE, HE HOSPITAL WOULD PURCHASE THE
PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY OF HART BOU EV ARD FROM THE HOSPITAL
ENTRANCE TO THE DENTAL CLINIC P OPERTY. THIS IS BASED ON A
FINDING THAT TI-IE PHYSICAL AND 0 ERA TIONAL CHARACTERISTICS OF
THE HOSPITAL PUD DO NOT CHANGE DER THE REVISED PUD. THIS
MOTION ALSO INCLUDES PREVIOUS UD APPROVAL CONDITIONS
INCLUDING THE OPTION FOR THE HO PIT AL TO CONTINUE TO PURSUE
WRITTEN DENTAL CLINIC APPRO V AL OR INDEMNIFICATION. Motion carried
unanimously.
.
MOTION WAS MADE BY ROBBIE SMIT AND SECONDED BY ROD
DRAGSTEN TO RECOMMEND APPROV L OF THE VARIANCE TO THE FRONT
YARD SETBACK REQUIREMENTS FRO 30 FEET TO ZERO FEET, SUBJECT TO
THE CITY COUNCIL'S APPROVAL OF T IE PUD AMENDMENT AND SUBJECT
TO THE HOSPITAL PURCHASING THE UBLIC RIGHT OF WAY OF HART
BOULEV ARD FROM THE HOSPITAL EN RANCE TO THE DENTAL CLINIC
PROPERTY IF THE HOSPITAL SHOULD CQUIRE THE DENTAL CLINIC
PROPERTY AND SUBJECT TO A PROPE TY SURVEY. THIS IS BASED ON THE
FINDING THAT THE VARIANCE DOES OT ALTER THE ULTIMATE DESIGN
OF THE PROJECT AND THAT THERE IS RECEDENT IN THE HOSPITAL
CAMPUS AREA FOR SIMILAR SETBAC CONSlPERATIONS. Motion carried
unanimously.
.
-.<. .'. .', :-.. - . ., ,.'. ...
" . S--"
'7. ...
.
18.
.
.
Council Agenda - 12/14/98
the
(1.0.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROl
The City received a lettcr from the MOA Board requesting that the Township and City
remove the Southwest Area Plan as an aU chment to the agreement, thereby opcning up
land use planning in this area to the MOA Board.
For the past few months, the MOAA has een working toward development of the
MOAA land use plan, which will become the basis for decision making by the MOAA
with regard to annexation. For each anne ation request, the proposed land use must be
consistent with the MOAA land use plan. Under the current City/Township agreement,
the Southwest Area study is intended to b the basis for the MOAA plan. It appears,
however, that the majority of the MOAA embers, including City representatives, are
not in agreement with portions ofthe So hwest Area Plan. This situation has become a
stumbling block for approval of an MOA land use plan. The MOAA has, therefore,
requested that the City and Township mo ify the agreement by removing the requirement
that the Southwest Area Plan must be inc rporated into the MOAA land use plan. This
action would open up land use designatio s to be set by the MOAA, which would then
lead to the need for the City to amend its comprehensive plan to then match the MOAA
plan.
The Southwest Area Plan resulted from traditional city comprehensive planning process
and is an extension of the City's compre ensive plan. It incorporated both land use and
infrastructure planning necessary to sup ort land use decisions. It was approved by a
unanimous vote of the City Council. If t e Southwest Area study is removed from thc
agreement and then the land use designa ions by the MOAA differ from the Southwest
Area Plan, then the City will need to co sider modifying the comprehensive plan for the
areas of conf1ict.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Motion to request a meeting wit the MOAA to discuss ideas for modifying the
Southwest Area. Intent is to re ove all or portions of the Southwest Area Plan
after review of MOAA concerns by the Planning Commission and City Council.
Under this alternative, City Plan ing representatives would visit with the MOAA
regarding concerns and ideas. It would provide the MOAA with an opportunity to
get additional City input on the reliminary MOAA plan and provide the City
with a good comfort level that t e plan is reasonable and likely for adoption in the
future as an amendment to the c mprehensive plan.
2.
Motion to removc a portion of t e Southwest Area Plan from the agreement. This
option should be selected if the ouncil would like to see the MOAA playa
35
Council Agenda - 12/14/98
.
leadership role in evaluating land u es in a confined area within the MOAA. The
portion removed identified in the a tached exhibit. This is the area identifiede in
Salkowski's letter that is afconcer to the MOAA. Perhaps removal ofa smaller
area within the MOAA is appropri te. As with the alternative above, the City will
need to update its comprehensive Ian accordingly.
Under this option, land use plmmi g in the area is under the direction of the
MOAA. If the intent ofthe agree ent or emerging intent is to grant the MOAA
with the leadership role in establis ing land uses on the City's borders, then this
option should be selected. This 0 tion provides freedom to the MOAA to set up
land uses in a manner consistent ith the goals of representatives from the
Township, County, and City. Ho ever, it could result in a plan that is not
consistent with the City's compre ensive plan, which could then create problems
when evaluating annexation of p eels that do not have the same land use
designation under both the MOA and City comprehensive plan. Ifthis
alternative is selected, it should b based on the assumption that the City would
adopt land use patterns establishe by the MOAA.
3.
Motion to remove the Southwest rea Plan from the agreement as requested.
4.
Motion to request a recommende land use pattern from the MOAA to become
the basis of an amendment to the omprehensive plan. This amendment would
then replace the Southwest Area tudy.
.
This alternative should be selecte if the City Council wishes to follow its
traditional role of making land u e decisions for land coming into the city with
input from interest parties. Und r this alternative, the MOAA would propose
changes to the Southwest Area s dy, which would then be evaluated by the
Planning Commission and City ouncil via the City's planning process. As part
of this process, a public hearing ould be held which would incorporate
comments from the MOAA and thers interested in development in the Southwest
Area. Under this option, the M AA plan follows the City's comprehensive plan.
c. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
The City Administrator recommends al ernative # 1.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Letter from Tom Salkowski.
.
6
..
~ .
... "n
Office of
NNING AND ZONING
.
WRI HT COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER
10 Seeol d Street NW, Rm 140, Buffalo, MN 55313-1186
(612) 682-7338
Fax # (612) 682-7872
CO~b~
7856
December 3, 1998
To: Darlene Sawatzke, Monticello Township Clerk
Rick Wolfsteller, Monticello City Administrator ,/.
From: Tom Salkowski, Monticello Joint Planning B ar~u';
Re: Alteration of Joint Resolution
.
At their meeting on December 2, 1998, the Montice 10 Joint Planning Board unanimously passed a
motion to request that the City and Township alter t e Joint Resolution adopted by both bodies in
March of 1998- At the December meeting, counselor the City explained to the Joint Planning Board
that the joint agreement requires, in paragraph 3 on age 2, that the land use plan being developed for
the orderly annexation area "will incorporate the Ci y's Southwest Area Concept Plan attached as
exhibit C." As the Joint Planning Board has held a ublic hearing, extensively reviewed, and is moving
toward adoption of a land use plan for the entire or erly annexation area, it has become clear that the
Southwest Area Concept Plan attached to the agree ent as Exhibit C is not acceptable to a majority of
the Board for at least two reasons.
First, the City has changed the Southwest Area Co cept Plan since March as is evident on the latest
plans submitted to the Joint Planning Board by Mr Grittman. Exhibit C, if adopted as attached to the
joint agreement, would not comply with current Ci plans for the Southwest area. Secondly, the
inclusion of a large industrial area as drawn on E ibit C east of Cameron Avenue and north of County
Highway 39 is opposed by a majority of the Joint lanning Board.
It is my understanding that the Joint Planning Bo d has reached general agreement on a land use plan
map for the vast majority of the orderly annexatio area, but there is not such consensus on a few
remaining areas. The primary areas still being dis ussed include the large industrial designations to the
west and southwest, and the southern Highway 25 corridor. At this point, a requirement that the
Exhibit C Southwest Area Concept Plan version ust be included in the new land use plan is an
impediment to progress. There was discussion tha the Joint Planning Board could adopt a plan
incorporating Exhibit C as required and then imm diately start hearings to amend the plan, but that
makes little sense to anyone. A better alternative hould be to incorporate changes into a new land use
plan before adoption, especially if a plan can be d veloped that will be acceptable to both the City and
the Township.
.
Therefore, the Joint Planning Board has asked th t I write the City Council and Township Board, and
request that you agree to amend the Joint Resoluf on to eliminate the following sentence from
paragraph 3: "The land use plan will incorporate he City's Southwest Area Concept Plan attached as
exhibit c."
Printed 0 recycled paper.
Equal Opportunity I {{irmative Action Employer
,1-- I
..--.i .................-.,. "
'lIIIft
I
SOUTl
ST AREA CONCEPT PL.i\1~
.,...l) ...(i' ..
lltt.- vol'''' ~r
l' ,,~ tI' 1)
XO
L/
~
N~
May 1998
o 1000 2000 3000
~
SCALE IN FEET
AdoJed h
. r d?8
{oli#;1
,
.
l
I
I
I
I
_' i
,., 1
Areo for
.
Future Study
-,
"' .'"
"' ..
, . ""'1
'. t., '.:" .:':'<:.~:~::::
.,.".,"'"
.\}~
'I
.
D Low Density Residential
_ Medium / High Densfty Residemial
_ Industrial
o Public / Semi Public
_-~".:1r'
~ ~Commercial
~!;~
o Future Street ,r ' 1--
..,
i
SO't:Tll "EST :-\.REA CONCEPT PLA1~
~
~
N.,...."oer , 997
o 1000 2000 XilO
~
SCALE IN FEET
i .
: . - :..~. ~~ t'
i :', .~
i '
Low Density Residential
III Incus-:Ticl
..
=r
~
t:JZtLJ
-
-
, .
Medium I High Density Resicen l'cL__J Public I Semi Public
Commercial
· II I Future Street
fl'~
CJ:LLO
Exhibit C .. Southwest .Area Concept Plan
DEC-14-1998 15:44 FROM GOEMAN REALTY INC
TO
295441214
P.l2I2
From: Affected Land owners,
Gregory & Deborah Dahlhiemer
Daniel & Janice Goeman
Gregory & Barbra Ann Smith
Joel & Donna Winkelman
Judy O'Donnell
1/[(
COP,
.
To Monticello City Council Members,
Ref.: Item 18 on December 14,1998 City C cil Agenda=
This whole move toward development of th Southwest area was a main thrust for the
Township during the annexation issue over 1 d to the Southeast by the Orrin Thompson
Group and others in that general area. The p sent City Council agreed to this concession
to encourage progress in the whole annexati n issue.
Consideration of adopting amendments to Ci rrownship agreement removing the
<'Southwest Area Concept Plan" as an attac ent to the agreement.
The Southwest Area Concept Plan was adop d by the City Council of the City of
Monticello on March 2nd 1998 and by the M nticello Township Board March Sth 1998.
.
As Landowners in the area affected by this endment we are Strongly opposed to
removing the "Southwest Area Concept PI " from the agreement. The Industrial
Development Committee, City Planning Co . ssion, City Staff, Council members and
land owners of the vacant land in this area h ve spent oonsiderable time working out a
conoept that was acceptable to everyone inc uding placement of Buffers, "Areas For
Future Study". between the proposed Indus ial Areas and existing residential areas.
Some areas already have natural buffers suc as the YMCA area of pines.
Any road connecting Co. Rd. 39 with 90111 S eet to alleviate school bus and other traffic
congestion in downtown Monticello would so be facilitated 'by an industrial/commeroial
development of our land rather than runnin such a road through a residential
development. This is also the logical conne tion to any future 1-94 clover leaf or ramps at
the 120m Street location proposed in long t plaUJ'ling.
Freeway fronting property has never been p. e residential development property due to
the noise. That noise is growing more int e each year with all the traffic Passini bv
MonticellQ to other communities with job p oducing industries. Freeway frontaic has
always been sought after by commercial an industrial companies to give them the
exposure to the public on the freeway. Thi in itself creates a buffer between the freeway
and residential property plus all Monticello City Ordinances spell out the requirement of
buffer areas between CommerciallIndustri areas and Residential areas.
.
.
.
.
DEC-14-1998 15:44 FROM GOEMAN REALTY INC
TO
295441214
P.12I3
That traffic noise is a wake up call to Monti ello. Do you want the noise to grow louder
as more traffic, business. &. employment op rtunities go down the road past us, or do
you want to get on with joining the 21 st Ce and bring those opportwrlties to the
Citizens of the City of Monticello as well the Citizens of Monticello Township and
the surrounding area. WAKE UP! Put awa: your differences and try to work together for
The Whole Community.
The Southwest Concept Plan has been wor ed out, adopted by both the City and the
Township and it should be left in place. As development comes to the area, all the
ordinances governing such development th t we have held to in the past, will still be in
place and have to be met in the future.
~
Judy O'Donnell
~)f(WAJ oJ~L/A71/A--"
Deborah Dahlheimer
~~
, Janice Goeman
Barbra Ann Smith
M~~-Jf-/2J.,~#-
Donna Winkelman
TOTAL P.12I3
II DEC-14-1998 15:43 FROM GOEMAN REALTY INC TO 295441214 P.l2I1
~. .
..3:: .
.
GOEMAN RE
FAX MACHINE C
FAX# (612)
Date: I /7~
To:
Number of pages (Includi g Cover Page): 3
If you do not receive all of these p ges, please-call ( 612 ) 295 - 4200
The information contained in 1his feClimile m- --,.e is p. "epd an4 OODfiderdia1, and isinteDdod only for the use
otthe indivi4ual ~ above IDe! others wbo have been "c:al1)- aulhorizec1 to recdve such. tfyou are DOt the
intended recipient. you ate hereby notifiecl1hat any disUibution or CClp)'ins of this oommunic:atiOD is
stric::Uy probibited.. If you have received this COIl\IftUDicetiQ in CIJ'Ol'. or if aJJy probloms occur with trusmfp:i~
please immediate!)" notify US by telephone (612). 29'....200'
.
.
.
.
19.
Council Agenda - 12/14/98
Consideration of ado
a~reement. (J.O.)
sewer extension
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGR
On October 26, the City Council directe the City Attorney to work with Kjellberg in
making revisions to the current agreeme t. Council direction is outlined in the attached
copy of the meeting minutes. This wor has now been completed, and the Council is
asked to consider adopting a number of hanges to the agreement as identified in
addendum #1 to the agreement. Both R'ck and I had some recollection that Council
wanted to immediately increase the hoo up fee by $250 due to the delay in executing the
original agreement. However, the minu es do not support this recollection.
Throughout the recent discussions, Kjel berg has stated that he has worked in good faith
to get the funds necessary to execute the original agreement. Unfortunately, by the time
he obtained the funds, it was too late for the City to complete the project in 1999. He
does not believe that he is in default un er the original agreement. Tod Eckberg of the
PCA believes that Kjellberg has been m ing an honest effort in getting the funds and
recommends that the City hold to the fe s under the original agreement.
As a result of recent meetings with Kjel berg and his attorney, a number of changes have
been introduced to the agreement as ide tified in the attached addendum. It is our view
that these changes clarify commitments and enhance the agreement. There are no
changes in the fees identified in the pro osed agreement. Additions to the original
agreement include:
1. Additional detail regarding deve oper responsibilities for constructing sewer
metering station.
2. Developer responsibilities for c nstruction of private sewer lines within the
mobile home park.
3. Clarification of the interest rate aid for City financing of construction of sewer
line.
4. Additional detail regarding deve oper responsibility to acquire easements over
land needed for construction of he sewer line.
5. Clarification of fee amount and bility ofthe City to use the fees for specific
purposes.
6. Recognition that petition for im rovements and annexation have been submitted.
7.
Clarification of City responsibil ties for completing the project once the fees have
been received.
3
Council Agenda - 12/14/98
.
8.
A specific amount ($60,000) idenffied as the deposit necessary to secure interest
payments replacing a formula for alculating the deposit amount.
9. Provision allowing a reduction in ecurity when the developer's obligation
diminishes.
10. Clarification of the requirement t at any new connections in the future will be
subject to prevailing fees.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Motion to adopt the amendments 0 the agreement as described.
Under this alternative, the agree ent is executed upon payment of fees. The
developer must pay the fee imme iately upon signing the agreement.
2.
Motion to adopt the amendments to the agreement but modify the original fee
structure.
.
Under this alternative, Kjellberg ill not likely sign the proposed agreement and
will argue that the original agree ent remains valid. If Council is inclined to
select this option, then the meeti g should be moved to a closed session.
3.
Table the matter.
C.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
It is the recommendation of the City A ministrator and the PCA to adopt the First
Addendum to the Development Agree ent. A number of positive changes have been
made to the agreement to clarify and st engthen the City's position and, therefore, it is
time to move ahead by adopting the ad endum.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Original agreement; Council minutes f om October 26, 1998.
.
38
-
,>
~ ~
.
.
.
. ,
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
KJELLBERG WEST M BILE HOME PARK
qrc....
Agreement made and into this / day of
f"<!:bl.......CrfQ ,1998, by and between the CITY OF MONTICELLO, a
municipal corporation organized nder the laws of the state of
Minnesota (the "City"), and KELLBERG'S, INC., a Minnesota
corporation (the "Developer").
R E C I
A L S:
WHEREAS, the Developer requ
extension of sanitary sewer se
mobile home park presently cons
Kj ellberg West Mobile Home Par
legally described on Exhibit A a
sts the City to extend or allow
ices (the "project") into the
sting of :.2.oc> units known as
(the "Mobile Home park") and
tached heretoi and
WHEREAS, the Mobile Home Park is outside the corporate
boundaries of the City and the De eloper wishes to have the Mobile
Home Park annexed into the CitYi and
WHEREAS, the City is willi g to extend City sanitary sewer
service into the Mobile Home Par under the terms and conditions
set forth in this Agreementi
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereb agreed:
1. A. The City shall con truct a sanitary sewer main from
its present location to a point on the northeast corner of the
Mobile Home Park as indicated on the attached Exhibit B and shall
construct the interconnection be ween the main referred to in this
paragraph and the main referred 0 in paragraph 1.D.
B. The main shall
selected by the City running
land owned by the City (the
Exhibit C attached hereto.
e constructed on an alignment
gh a 60 acre parcel of unimproved
Land") and legally described on
C. The City shall cons ruct and install a sewer metering
station on the Mobile Home Park p operty which, upon completion and
acceptance by the City, become a art of the real property on which
the Mobile Home Park is located and shall become the property of
the owners of the Mobile Home Par as their interests shall appear.
Prior to opening the connection from the metering statioq to the
City sewer, the Developer shall ay the City an amount equal to the
costs incurred by the City in c nstructing the metering station.
If the Developer fails to pay hese costs within 30 days after
demand by the City, then the Cit may withdraw those costs from the
security posted in accordance with paragraph 6.D.
-t
If --I
) ''J- - 5" - cr 'W
.
D. The Developer sha 1 install and construct and pay
for all sewer mains and laterals within the Mobile Home Park as are
necessary to provide the Mobile Home Park with adequate sewer
service in sufficient time to rovide for the interconnection
between the main referred to here'n and the main to be built by the
City on or before January 1, 19 9. In addition, the Developer
shall, upon the request of the Ci y, build the main large enough to
accommodate further expansion ou side the Mobile Home Park. The
City shall pay the Developer an mount equal to the increase cost
caused by the City's request.
2 . A. Subj ect to the t rms of this Agreement I the City
shall construct the main outside the Mobile Home Park as a public
improvement pursuant to Minnesot Statutes Chapter 429.
B. The City may sell bonds to finance construction of
the main and the Seller shall ay, as a special assessment, an
amount equal to the interest r te on the bonds plus 1 1/2% per
annum. If the city sells bonds that cover more than one project,
the Seller shall be required to pay interest on only that portion
of the bond attributable to thi Project.
c. The City contemp ates that the city Land will be
subdivided into smaller parcels that the City will convey to third
parties. Upon subdivision of th City Land, the City will reassess
for the main, assessing all the rincipal to the City Land, but the
Developer shall continue to p y interest as provided in this
paragraph 2. Upon conveyance 0 parcels to third parties, a pro-
rata share of interest and pr' ncipal shall be assessed against
those parcels, and the obligation of Developer to pay interest
shall be reduced accordingly. pon transfer by the City of 50% of
the area of the City Land, t e Developer's obligation to pay
interest pursuant to this para raph 2.C. shall terminate. In no
event shall the Developer's 0 ligation to pay interest extend
longer than 8 years.
3. A. The Developer h reby grants the City, its agents,
employees, officers and contr ctors an easement and license to
enter upon the Mobile Home pa k land to perform all work and/or
inspections the city deems n cessary or expedient during the
development of the improvement
B. The Developer sh 11 grant to the City such permanent
utility easements as the City ay require to complete and maintain
the improvements. In addition, the Developer shall pay the cost of
all easements the city acquir s outside the Mobile Home Park and
which are reasonably necessary 0 construction of the improvements.
Such costs shall include, ut not be limited to, price of
easements, administrative costs, attorneys' fees, court costs and
engineering fees. In the alt rnative, the Developer may acquire
the easements and transfer th m to the city. Such costs shall be
assessed against the property in accordance with this Agreement.
~
.
.
-2-
" ., z..-,
...,.......,......-
.
.
.
C. Developer shall gra t the City such utility easements
on the westerly 1/4 of Mobile H me Park property as the City may
reasonably require for future ex ens ion of the sanitary sewer and
other utilities to the west of the Mobile Home Park. The City
shall be responsible for the restoration cost associated with any
utility construction or repair ithin the easements done by the
City.
4. A. The Developer sha 1 pay an area assessment fee of
$75,000 (based on a 60 acre par el) and sewer connection fees in
the amount of $225,000. The se er connection fees shall be paid
into escrow upon execution of t is Agreement. On execution of a
contract for construction of the sewer mains, the City may withdraw
funds from the escrow to pay t e cost of constructing mains and
interconnection. Any money rem ining in escrow at conclusion of
construction shall be the prope ty of the City.
B. The area assessm nt fee shall be assessed to the
Mobile Home Park property in a cordance with Minnesota Statutes
Chapter 429 over a ten year peri d with interest at a rate 1.5% per
annum above the rate the City p ys on bonds for the Project.
5. The Developer that (except for
associating with other indivi uals or entities) prior to the
completion of the improvements' s set forth in this Agreement, in
the absence of specific writt n agreement by the City to the
contrary, no transfer of the p operty shall be' deemed to relieve
Developer from any of its obI gations. In the event the City
approves a substitute developer and the property is transferred to
the substitute, the City agr es to relieve the Developer of
liability from performance as escribed in this Agreement. The
substitute shall assume all r sponsibilities and rights of the
Developer under this Agreement.
6. A. The Developer sha I, within 60 days after execution
of this agreement, submit to the City council a petition, signed by
all persons owning an interest in the Mobile Home Park property,
and as provided for by Minn sot a Statutes 429.031 Subd. 3,
requesting that the sanitary sewer improvements be made and
assessed as set forth in thi Agreement. Simultaneously with
petitioning for improvements, Developer shall petition for
annexation of the Mobile Home ark into the City unless the City
requests otherwise. The petition for annexation shall not be a
condition precedent to constru tion of the Project.
B. Upon the Cit Council adopting a resolution
determining the sufficiency of he petition, the improvements shall
be designed and constructed 1n all respects, as other City
improvements made pursuant to t e provisions of Minnesota Statutes
Chapter 429 or other applicabl statutes. The City reserves the
right to reject any and all b ds for the construction of public
improvements. If the city re ects all such bids, then its sole
.(
-3-
'f-'
.
.
.
responsibility shall be to immed ately advertise for bids for the
public improvements.
C. The City shall caus
the Mobile Home Park property not
City and Developer shall cause th
operational not later than Janua
the sewer main to be extended to
later that January I, 1999. The
Project to be complete and fully
y I, 1999.
D. Prior to the Cit advertising for contracts for
construction, the Developer shal deposit with the City a sum of
money, escrow account, bond or rrevocable letter of credit, in
form acceptable to the City in t e amount of $30,000.00 plus two
years interest as calculated un er paragraph 2 hereof. If all
installments of special assessm nts shall be paid in a timely
manner and other conditions set orth in this Agreement are met,
the security deposit shall be reI ased to Developer; otherwise, the
City may use such funds to cure ny default or satisfy, partially
or wholly, any judgment it might obtain on account of any default
by the Developer. In the even Developer violates any of the
covenants and agreements herein contained or fails to pay any
installments of special assessm nts when due, the City, at its
option, in addition to and not i lieu of its rights and remedies
otherwise granted hereunder or b law, may as to the lot, or lots
or outlots on which there is a default declare all the unpaid
special assessments levied purs ant to this Agreement due and
payable in full upon 30 days writ en notice of default directed to
the Developer at its last known a dress, and if the Developer fails
to cure such default within th 30 day period, the City may
commence legal action against th Developer to collect the entire
unpaid balance, including reasonable attorneys' fees. The
Developer shall be liable for suc special assessments, whether or
not the Developer owns any intere t in the lots, as to which there
have been defaults.
E. If any escrow accou t, bond or irrevocable letter of
credit deposited with the City i accordance with this Agreement
shall have an expiration date p ior to 30 days after the last
installment for special assessme ts is due, the Developer shall
renew such security or deposit su stitute security of equal value,
meeting the approval of the City ttorney, at least 30 days prior
to the expiration of such security. Failure to post such alternate
security or renew such security s all constitute a default and the
City may declare the entire amoun thereof due and payable to the
City, in cash. Such cash shall t ereafter be held by the City as
a security deposit in the same ma ner as the security theretofore
held by the City. Any amount he City draws and any security
posted under this Agreement, the D veloper shall replace the amount
of such draw upon 30 days written notice from the City.
F. For purposes of th's Agreement and for purposes of
special assessments only, Develo er agrees that the improvements
contemplated by this Agreement ill increase the value of the
~
-4
,,- '"
.
Mobile Home Park by at least th value of the obligations the
Developer is incurring under this Agreement.
7. The Developer will prov de and maintain or cause to be
maintained at all times during the process of constructing
improvements and until six mo ths after the city accepts
improvements constructed by Devel per and, from time to time, at
the request of the city furnish w th proof of payment of premiums
on:
A. comprehensive gener 1 liability insurance (including
operations, contingent liability operations of subcontractors,
completed operations and contractu 1 liability insurance) , together
with an owner's contractor's po icy with limits against bodily
injury, including death and prope ty damage (to include but not to
be limited to damages caused by erosion or flooding) which may
arise out of the Developer's w rk or the work of any of its
subcontractors. Limits for bod'ly injury or death shall not be
less than $500,000.00 for one P rson and $1,000,000.00 for each
occurrence i limits for property damage shall not be less than
$200,000.00 for each occurrence. The City, city Engineer and
Developer's Engineer shall be an additional named insured on said
policy. Developer shall file a c py of the insurance coverage with
the city upon request.
B.
Worker's
insurance, with statutory
.
coverage.
8. A. The terms and prov' sions hereof shall be binding upon
and inure to the benefit of the eirs, representatives, successors
and assigns of the parties her to and shall be binding upon all
future owners of all or any par of the subdivision and shall be
deemed covenants running with the land. Reference herein to
Developer, if there be more tha one, shall mean each and all of
them. This Agreement, at the 0 tion of the City, shall be placed
of record so as to give notice h reof to subsequent purchasers and
encumbrancers of the subject P operty and all recording fees, if
any, shall be paid by the Devel per.
B. If section, subsection, sentence,
clause, paragraph or phrase of this Agreement is for any reason
held invalid, such decision sh 11 not affect the validity of the
remaining portions of -this Agr ement.
C. The inaction or a tion of the City or Developer shall
not constitute a waiver or am ndment to the provisions of this
Agreement. To be binding, a endments or waivers shall be in
writing, signed by the parti s sought to be charged with such
waiver, and approved by writte resolution of the City Council if
the City is the waiving party. The failure to promptly take legal
action to enforce this Agreeme t shall not be a waiver or release.
.t,
.
-5-
".r
.
.
.
D. Required notices to the Developer shall be in writing
and shall be either hand deliver d to the Developer, or mailed to
the Developer by united State mail , postage prepaid to the
following address: 1000 Kjellbe g's Park, Monticello, MN 55362,
or such other address as may be esignated in writing from time to
time. Notices to City shall be in writing and either hand
delivered to the City Administra or or mailed to the City by united
States mail, postage prepaid to the address: City of Monticello,
250 East Broadway, P.O. Box 1147, Monticello, Minnesota 55362.
9. Upon execution of this
proof acceptable to the City'
marketable title to the Mobile
greement, Developer shall furnish
attorney that it has good and
orne Park Project.
10. Once the project is c mpleted and operational, the City
will not charge Developer for a y routine maintenance it performs
on the Project. During any peri d when the flow monitoring device
is inoperable, the City will estimate flow based on monitoring
records for prior periods of ti e.
11. The City does not wa
Agreement or the improvements
Agreement are in compliance 0
Consent Decree entered into bet
Attorney General, Hubert H. Hump
Wright County District Court
between the parties on or about
rant to the Developer that this
to be built pursuant to this
will be in compliance with the
een the State of Minnesota by its
rey III, and Kjellberg's, Inc., in
ile No. Cl-92-2439 entered into
April 29, 1997:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
Developer's Agreement the
and Developer have signed this
first above written.
CITY:
CITY OF MONTICELLO
~u~
Its: .Ad/a c;+o j)dv..A,/l
And y:
Its:
~
-6-
,'-(,p
.
.
.
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
)ss
COUNTY OF WRIGHT )
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
)ss
COUNTY OF (}Jt-t ref-/-'-)
-:;;.t/
acknowledged before me this~
. . I and '
of the City of
on behalf of the
No ary
I..Jll
me this /"0-
the
rporation
The foregoing instrument w s ackn w e~ge
da:;1 ~~ ,1998, Y Y'IC
:t ' of Kjellber '5, Inc., a
on oehalf of the corporation.
KAREN DOTY
NOTARY PUBUG-MINNESOTA
WRIGHT COUNTY
My Commission [xplres Jan. 31, 2000
<.:.'......J
muni\mont\79759797.01
N ta
.{
-7-
If ., 7
FEB-10-98 TUE 10:09 TRI CTY ABSTRACT
DEC-0S-S7 14'12 FROM'CHIC~.O TITLE AGENC
SENI' BY:F1iIU.lf' GROSSMaN <2- 5-37; 12:56;
__ - _., . - I
FAX NO, 3202534536
P,02/02
r / 'j ....
c... 7'" "1' ,6, .:...
ID.214 liI~4. 3elQ1
Ulf OffW......
,~ '.....,.'
r
,.ACJ;; 10/11
2149343810;# 6/ 6
--
The subject =OIIsists 9f two pare ls herelfter ,.eferred to as Pirt.eh "A- and -8"
as idaat.ifiecl by Te,)'loT Led $u eyor:s in Hont1cenn, Minnesota. Parcel -AU is
part 'of In una1V1det1 larger aqr1cultur~1 parcel owned by' tlte Kjel1ber;
: (.orpcn"at. on . .
: PIl1"C1! 1 A
Th~t ~rt of the South Half of \hs Southeast Qulrtor of Section )5, Tovnsh;p
131, R..n~ 25. Wright to\lntl. f'1i sotl described II follows: Beginning at th_
. , slIuthwlst' ,orner of' said SOUtb H 1f Df "tl'l8 Soytbeut Qulrter; theJ4ce north i1 Dn;
I the west 11ft. Of sai~ South Kalf of tt\$ Seut.hust QUoirter2 a. di$tanc~ of 1170#18
flit. thence- tiS't p~ra1l81 wt the $outb 1 ine of said South Half of the
SIlQthaU.t Quartor, a. d.1rtilftta of' 2:016_86 felt. to tile nBrthwest eornl!l" of a t,..et
af lln4 deed.d t.a W~l1i. Bella ; theca 'Gut.MSto..,.v ..long the wBsterly HnG
af said trict or 1.nd.. a distanc. af 212.00 'toto} thence sOlltneubr'y alan, thll
iiOlltharly line of said tract (If ..nd. i cll$tance of ~21.SU feet to the westerl]'
right af ria'! l1ne af M~nn.sota Sate K1ghw.y H;. 25; ~h.nce sou'thlleste1""Y along
Si1d westerly r1ght of ~ay line, I du",iftc;;1 gf '&3.tl1'let to tbe '$guth liue of
{' sl~d'58\lth Half of the Southeu Quarter; 1ftencI wst along uid sa'lu. line, ~
d;~~aftc~ of 1784.78 Teet to t~e point of b&g;n"i~g.
Also that p.!'i; cf the Eut Walt f the Sautta.est Qunur of Seation 15., Town,hip
l21, IQnS' Z5, Wright Cowt..1, K cme'9\a d.$~tbecl as '.110101$: Be,i"ftiDg ~'" 'he
. solftne.$'tj torner of saId East a1 t gf lb, SQutMe:at. Qu~rtert thence along In
as~alld ~ar;ng of' NOrth 0 deg tiS 06 .,"utes 53 ~and5 East 810nl the ..S~
liije of i~1d Elst half of the thwast Quarter. I G1staftCe Df 1988.Dg feet tQ
,thl! nart~east CMI'\IIP of U@ outh Ha.lf of the North..st Quarter of said
SoUtMstl Quarte,.~ th4mca north B9 degntl 04 aiftutu 81 l.conds \lact a10tl9 tho
nOl''th 11M of~$l.id South Hill' af tilt Northe;st Quarter of the Soutkwe.d Q&,&al"te...,
a distance 0' 286.07 feet; tho North 48 degrees ZEi .inlrtes 4D SGcGl\(IS we$t,
~ d1it.IRt:' af Z3S.82. feet; then North 89 degtCes 04- 1II1Dwtts 07 5Konds Vut,
I "ilitlnce of 9S.l6 fBtt; then south 19 d8gree~ 36 Minutes 40 set:onds West.
a clistlne! ~162.D8 fNt to s-. d nortl\ 11nl of thf:! South Half Df thB tfarthlut
Qua.1"t@.. crt SO<Jwest Quart r; then North 89 degree. 1M rainutes 01 sec.wis
!lint 11015 "d lJorth 11fte, i d stanee of '1 ..sS feetl thanr.8 South 0 degrees 06
Ilinutes soc:ondJ Vaat, ,;. di 5t ftCO of 4.00.00 f..t; th...ee South 89 d't9re.s 01.
1lI1nutes ill;onds Eut, iil dis ann of 300.03 feet; \heru;e south 0 degrees 06
'Itnutes Sl!t:Onds We$\. .. dh &nee Df 1567.7; fest 1.12 the south line of said
East Half of tlte SoU~hwtst Q" rter; then~' SOUth 88 degrees !i;S lIinutes 59
seconds East a1ang RAid south 1 ine. a dhtlftl;t Df 319.07 feet tD the PD~lIt of
b@giru~fftg. . \
A. plat JRilp for Pillr;,' A folloM on 'the next page:
u~w. DI$CR!PTJGN
R1510
tBlClIIba A Hlftse APPrAisals, Inc.
lU
'I'
~0'I'IlL P.l!G l
"." .
,
---
--
./
r--....
a
~ ~
co
..i\J " -'
" \ \ " '. "" " \ \ / \ '-- /
\ " " ' \ "- ", '" \ \ \ f /0'
"C \ J . \\' J \ " "\ -r- OF 7 HE S fv
" L --/ '<' I b <: l -'EdT U';;1i\ OF 'THE 5\'/2 O~ THE NE 1/4
\ \ \ I /4 OF SECTION\ 15 \ , \
\ \ \/'v' 1 \ \' \ \ \\ \ \
\ I I \ \ \. ,(
/ I \ \ '\ 1 I r" 8 51,
/ / J \ I . 0 · 06 ' 53. ,Ii B j .
.-" 0",_ .
" '~ ,
\\\ \ \ \ ~
53"' \ 5-'1 \' \' 6:'''
, 1 (
"
,
.......
\~\- o' \~~1( "",
() 'f IJ (~" '"
~ f'l' / ~ ~ \
""' '(' f.\"
~ )
~ /1
,/
.....
~.
~~:;
.
-'"
,
/
I
I
\.
......... "
,
9:;.f~'
,
--.
.....
.......
.......
t~
~~
.....'"
\
"
-..
-.....
.....-.
')< "
f},.. .
/
~
..
t....
9
~
c
o
--
/'
-
.
'f'
1.1'/. c
~
I-.;
EXIBlT C
.'
That part of Sections 14 and 15-121-2 described as follows: Commencing at
the SW corner of the SE 1/4 of said S ction 15; thence North along the West
line of the said SE 1/4, 1170.18 feet ( 023/25 rods); thence East parallel with
the South line of the said BE 1/4,72300 feet to the actual point of beginning;
thence continue East parallel with th said South line, 1669.49 feet to the W-
ly right of way line of Minnesota Tru k Highway No. 25; thence NE-ly
deflecting 63!! 11' 30" left along the s .d right of way line, 611.21 feet; thence
continue NE-ly along the said right 0 way line along a tangential curve,
concave to the NW having a central gle of 8!! 52' 24" and a radius of
5745.44 feet, a distance of889.79 fee; thence continue NE-ly along the said
right of way line tangent to the last described curve a distance of 54.42 feet to
a line parallel with and distant 66.00 feet South of the North line of the NW
1/4 of SW 1/4 of Section 14; thence W st along the said parallel line, 441.10
feet to the West line of said NW 1/4 0 SW 1/4; thence continue West parallel
with the North line of the said SE 1/ of Section 15, 66.00 feet; thence North
parallel with the East line of the sai SE 1/4,66.00 feet to the North line of
the said SE 1/4; thence West along t e North line of the said BE 1/4, 1807.60
feet to a line parallel with and dista t 723.00 feet East of the West line of the
said SE 1/4; thence South along the aid parallel line, 1478.51 feet to the
point of beginning, including therein Lot A of the NW 1/4 of SW 1/4 of
Section 14-121-25. Subject to easem nts of record.
.
.
{
"-10
.
.
.
8.
Public Works Director John Simola rep
tabled action on the development agree
West Mobile Home Park pending revie
review by City staff and the City Attor
time table for completion of the work,
revised.
COpy
Council Minutes - 10/26/98
s Inc. for the sanitar sewer
rted that at the October 12 meeting, Council
ent for sanitary sewer hookup of Kjellbergs
of data provided by Kjellbergs, Inc. After
y, it was noted that language regarding fees, the
d payments on the monitoring station should be
City Administrator Rick Wolfsteller no ed that he received a letter from Tod Eckberg of
the Minnesota Pollution Control Agenc , which stated that they would like the City to try
and meet the January 1,1999, construct"on deadline; however, the PCA is willing to
extend the deadline to the summer of 1 99 ifthe project must be delayed. The PCA also
indicated they have proposed changes t their contract with Kjellbergs, Inc.; however,
City staff has not yet received any info ation regarding those amendments.
City Attorney Dennis Dalen recommen ed that Council review the agenda information,
make comments, and authorize continu d negotiations with Kjellbergs, Inc.
Council discussed their concerns regar ing the length of time the project has taken and
that the City has not received the $225, 00 deposit agreed upon to maintain the 1997
hook-up rate. It was suggested that ifn agreement is reached by the December 14
Council meeting, the hook-up rate sho ld be increased, with an additional increase of
$500 as of January 1, 1999, when the 1. 99 hook-up rates take effect.
After further discussion, it was the con ensus of Council to authorize the City Attorney to
continue negotiations with Kjellbergs, nc., until December 14, 1998. If an agreement is
not signed by this date, the hook-up rat for Kjellbergs West Mobile Home Park will
increase by $250; in addition, the rate ill increase $500 when the 1999 hook-up rates
take effect on January 1, 1999.
14 -I I
tOEC. - ;0' 98 (THUI
..
,J
t
~
.-
;:
~,
~
t
I
,
j
~
fe
f
12:28
OLSON USSET & WEINGARDEN P. L. L. P
TEL:612 925 5879
P. 002
FIRST ADD NDUM TO
DBVEI.OPMENT AGREEMENT
filE COPy
XJELLBBRG WES'1'
BILE HOMl: PAlUC
Addendum to that certain Deve opment Agreement entered into on
the ____ day of , l 98, by and between the CITY OF
MONTICELLO, a municipal corporatio organized under the laws of the
state of Minnesota (the "City"), a d KJELLBERG'S INC.. a Minnesota
corporation (the IlDeveloper").
WHEREAS, the parties deem it necessary to make certain
amendments to the aforementioned evelopment Agreement herein;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consider tion of the mutual covenants
contained herein, it is hereby greed that the aforementioned
Development Agreement can be amen ed as follows:
1. Paragraph 1.C. is hereb amended to read as follows:
1.C. The Developer shall construct and
install a sewer metering station on the mobile
home park property, wh ch metering station
will be built in accorda ce with City and OSHA
standards and shall be ubject to inspeetion
by the City during construction. The
Developer shall d liver plans and
specifications for the m taring station to the
city engineer within 30 days after this
Addendum has been exec ted by all parties.
The oity engineer shal have 30 days after
receipt of the plans nd specifications to
review them and to not' fy the Developer in
writing, by u.s. mail or personal delivery, as
to any corrections or m difications the city
engineer reasonably req ires. Mailed notice
shall be deemed made when the notice is
deposited in the u.s. mil. If the engineer
fails to give any such notice within 30 days,
the plans and specifica ions shall be deemed
approved.
Notwithstanding anything t the contrary in this
agreement, the City should n t be required to open the
interconnection between the ity mains and the mobile
home park mains until the se er monitoring station has
been fully constructed and accepted by the City.
2 . Paragraph 1. A. of the afo ementioned agreement is amended
to read as follows:
'f
19",/2,
DEC. -10' 98(THU) 11:36
.
OLSON USSET & WEINGARDEN . L. L. P
TEL:612 925 5879
P. 002
Paragraph 1.D. is amend d to read as follows:
The Developer shall ins all and conatruct and
pay for all sewer mai a and lateral~ within
the mobile home park as are necessary to
provide the mobile ho e park with adequate
sewer service. The Dev loper represents that
construction of such mains has been completed
as of the date of thi Addendum. Developer
ahall provide City with a certification by its
professional engineer, Brian Dobie, that all
such mains have been b ilt in accordance with
the Ten State standards and such certification
shall be in form ace ptable to the citY'13
attorney and engineer.
4 . Paragraph 2. B. of the aforementioned agreement is amended
to read a8 follows.
3.
.
5.
follows~
.
1.A. The City shall construct a sanitary
sewer main from its p esent .location to a
point on, the northeast corner of the mobile
home park as indicated n the attached Exhibit
B and shall construct the interconnection
between the main referr d to in paragraph 1.D.
on or before october 1, ~999.
2.B. The City may s 11 bonds to finance
construction of the ma n and the seller shall
pay, as a special asae sment, an amount equal
to the interest rate 0 the bonds plue 1 1/2%
per annum. Such inter at shall run from the
date the City complet s its work under this
agreement. If the city sells bonds that cover
more than one proj ect, the seller shall be
required to pay intere t only on that portion
of the bond attributab e to this project.
Paragraph 3.B. of the agreement is amended to read as
3.B. The Developer Ii all grant to the City
such permanent utilit easements as the City
may require to comp ete and maintain the
improvements. In a dition, the Developer
shall acqu~re all easements the City
reasonably requires 0 teide the mobile home
park in ~rder to cons ruct the improvements,
and shall provide thos easements to the City
on or before Janua 1, 1999. If the
Developer fails to do 0, the City may prooeed
to acquire such easeme ts and Developer shall
pay the cost of all such easements to the
City. Such costs sh 11 be assessed against
I'I-/S
DEC. -10' 98(THU) 11:36
OLSON USSET & WEINGARDEN P. . L. P
TEL:612 925 5879
r. UUv
.
the propert.y
agreement.
in acc rdance
with this
6. Paragraph 3.C. of the
follows;
is amended to read as
3.C. Developer shall 9 ant the City 30 foot
wide sewer and utility easements along the
perimeter oi the mobile orne park for purposea
of future extension of sanitary sewer and
other utilities to the w at of the mobile home
park. The City shall b responsible for the
restoration coat associ tad with any utility,
construction or repair within the easements
done by ~he city.
is hereby amended to read
7. paragraph 4.A. of the ag
as follows:
B . paragraph 6. A. of th agreement is hereby amended by
adding a sentence as follows:
6.A. The parties ackn wledge that a petition for public
improvements in acc rdance with Minneeota Statutes
429.031 Subd. 3 and a etition for annexat.ion have, as of
the date of this adde dum. been submitted.
4.A. The Developer shall pay an area
assessment fee of $75,0 0 (based on a 60 acre
parcel) and sewer co nection fees in the
amount of $225.000. Sewer connection feea
shall be paid into es roW upon execution of
this agreement and adde dum. The city may use
the $225,000 for de igo, engineering and
construction of the C' ty' e work under this
agreement, and any mon y remaining in escrow
at conclusion of cons ruction shall be the
property of the City. The fact that the city
uses the aforementione $225,000 for design,
engineering and const ction does not relieve
the Developer of any paymenta that must be
made under this agreem nt.
.
9 . ~aragraph 6. c. of the greement is hereby amended to read
as follows =
6.C. The City shall ave advertised for bide
not later than 90 day after execution of this
agreement and addendu and Developer haa paid
the sewer connectio fees as provided in
paragraph 4.A. of the agreement, as amended.
.
14., II/-
DEC. -10' 98 (THUl 11: 37
.
.
.
OLSON USSET & WEINGARDE P. L. L. P
TEL:612 925 5879
P. 004
10. Paragraph 6.0. of the a reement is hereby amended to read
as follows:
6.D. The amount of dep sit as required by paragraph 6.D.
of the agreement is hereby amended to the sum of
$60,000.00, in place a d instead of ~30,OOO.00, plus two
years interest.
11. Paragraph 6.E. of the
a sentence as follows;
greement is hereby amended adding
~2.
follows:
ial obligatiops under
eee than the amount of
ount of security shall,
ten request, be reduced
of the Developer'S
If Developer'S finan
this agreement become
security posted, the a
at the Developer'S wri
to equal the amoun
financial obligations.
The agreement is amen ed by adding a paragraph 12 as
12. The Developer sha 1 provide the City with
a list of the faci ities that are being
connected to City san tary sewer pursuant to
this agreement. The sewer connection f4!es
being paid under this agreement ahall apply
only to the facilities so identified, and any
other facilities conn cted to the City sewer
main at anytime shall e subject to payment of
connection fees at the then existing
connection rate.
Dated this ____ day of
CITY:
, 19____
CITY OF MONTICELLO
B
William
Its: Mayor
Rick Wolfsteller
Ita: City Administrator
I'",/~
DEC. -10' 98(THU) 11:37
.
f
.
;.
Mun1\mont\7-97.Dl
OLSON USSET & WEINGARD N P. L. L. P
TEL:612 925 5879
INC.
P. DOS
AndB
Its:
Itl3:
I~",I"
8RC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
11/24/98 09:31 :55
Schedule of Bills
.
Reoort Selection:
RUN GROUP... 01124 COMMENT. .. 11/24 CKS
OA ThJE-IO
DATA COMMENT
-------------- ------.------------------
0-11241998-702 11/24 CKS
CITY OF MONTICELLO
GL050S-YO _20 COYERPAGE
iJl.~i4 01;
RU!l Instructions:
Joba Banner Cooies Form Printer Hold Soace LP! Lines CPl
.J 01 Y S 6 066 10
.
.
8RC FINANC]AL SYSTEM
11/24/98 09:31 :57
.OOR NAME
DESCR]PTION
A E M]CHAELS
AN SHELTER- MAINT SUPP
AN SHELTER-MAINT SUPP
A ~1 LEONARD INC
PAR~S-JACKETS
AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCI
PLANNING-DUES
AUTOMA TI C GARAGE DOOR CO
SHOP-V BELT & SUPPLIES
tlAR8AROSSA & SONS, INC.
COMM CENTER
[lARR ENGINEERING COMPANY
COM CENTER
f:J.(() L.W: l.UMBER
PAR~S-OP SUPPLIES
.LEIN FARMS P.ARK
BRAUN ENGINEERING
7TH AVENUE
M[:ADOW OAK PARK
7TH AVE IMPR
MEADOW OM PARK
FREEWAY PARK
BRC - ASSIST CENTER
CH-COMD M/A
BROCK WHITE COMPANY, LLC
SHO!LBLOG MA]NT SUPPU ES
WWTP-I~ & M
STREETS-SIDEWALK F]Ll
COMMERC I Al. ASPHALT COMPA
STRr;ETS-WEAR
DMA-'MP INC
lOC~ BOX FOR RESAL.E
.lEL JAMES
ARf~-?X[j' S
RENT OUE-CREDITED 2X6'S
Schedule of Bills
AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME
i:UND & ACCOUNT
56.53 MISC REPAIR & MTC UPPLI 101.42701.2299
13.47 MISC RfPAU~ & MTC ~'IJPPU 101.42701.2299
70.00 *YENDOR TOTAL
157.62 CLOTHING SUPPLIES
101.45201. ?111
246.00 DUES, MEMBERSHIP & URse 101.41910.4330
153.58
205,758.13
10,640.16
172.87
280.45
453.32
415.50
225.50
534.50
24.50
14 9.00
1.349.00
1,818.00
355.60
12.25
358.33
726.18
21.62
3,7'I!i.OO
MISC OPERATING SUPP lES 101.43127.2199
PROF SRV - ENG]NEER NG F 461.49201.3030
PROF SRV - ENG]NEER NG F 461.49201.3030
MIse OPERATl Ne SUPI) I ES 101. 4520 1. 21 99
MISC PROFESSIONAL S Rvrc 101.41910.3199
*YENOOR TOTAL
MIse PROFESSIONAL S RV]C 462.49201.3199
MISC PROFESSIONAL SERYIC 101 41910.3199
MIse PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 462.49201.3199
MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 101.41910.3199
M]SC PROFESSIONAL SERV]C 462.49201.3199
*VENDOR TOTAL
PROF SRV -. i)~.TA PROC .SSl 101.41920.3090
BUILDING REPAIR SUPD IES 101.4312'.?230
MISC REPAIR & MTC SU PLI 436.49201.2299
MIse OPERATING SUPPL ES 10U31?0.2199
*YENDOR TOTAL
MIse OPERATING SUPPL ES 101.43120.2199
SMALL TOOLS & EOUlPM NT 10'.4??01.2410
150.00 8IOSOl]OS FARM IMPRO EME 602.49480.4385
50.00CR RENTAL OF PROPERTY 602.36220
-'.,~,--- ---------- --.'-.--.,.
CLAIM INVOICE
3890"
39025
014375300001
0108509-IN
#1
2386046-3
103170
103708
110484
11048'1
112042
112046
112175
1201510 RI
EG10353001
sel1095'101
SP1206770 1
. NP7006
3576
CITY OF MONTICEll"O
GL540R-V05.20 PAGE 1
PO# F/P ID LINE
702 00003
'/02 00004
702 00001
702 00111
70? 00002
702 00105
702 00112
702 00008
702 OOOOY
702 00010
702 00011
702 00039
702 00040
702 00038
702 00012
702 DODO?
702 OOOOS
702 00006
702 00114
702 00014
702 00057
702 000S8
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
11/24/98 09;31 :57
.OOR NAME
IlESCRIPTlON
CAN lEl. ,J AM ES
O[:HN TREE CO
STUMP R[f~OV AL
DYNAMIC SYSTEMS, INC.
SEWER-R & M
flECTiON SYSTEMS & SOFTW
ELECTIONS-PAPER ROLL
EMERGITEK CORPORATION
REPAIR SURGE DAMAGE
FAIR'S NUf(SFRY
SHADE TREE-(13) Tf(EES
H;DE!<Al. r:XfJi<ESS
WATER-SAMPLE
WATER-SAMPLE
COM!'iI CENTER-WATER SAMPLE
.
(i & K SERVICES
WATER
P~I A OM
oW INSP
~)Tf( E ET S
iJAR~S
SEWER
~3HOP TOWELS
[NY CHARGE, SALES TAX
PW-,-RLJ3S
LIQUOR-RUGS
GARTNER'S OFFICE PRODUCT
CH-OFFICE SUPPLIES
CH-OFFICE SUPPLIES
CH-OFFICE SUPPLIES
CH-OFFICE SUPPLIES
Tff<EETS..(JPS
GEYER RENTAL-ST CLOUD
STi~mS-BUMP
.OIN. COMPANY
WTP-V ALVES
Schedu1fl of ,'i1is
AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME
100,00 *YENDOR TOTAL
FUNO & ACCOUNT
591,08 1997 STORM DAMAGE EXPS S 101.42501.4401
734,00 REPAIR & MTC - MACH & :0 602.49490.4044
7.85 MIse OPERATING SUPPLIE 101.41410.2199
262.75 REPAIR & MTC - MA0~ & EO 10' .4220',4044
100.00 TREE REPLACEMENT
33.50
23.50
30.00
87.00
45.94
20,43
71. 61
84.33
181. 20
47.93
39.55
70.56
36.89
65.68
664,12
135.62
368.43
14.80
337.50
4.82
861.17
224.4Gl02,4391
PROF SRV - SOFTWARE/P GR 601.49440.3091
PROF SRY - SOFTWARE/P GR 601.49440.3091
DELIVERY MAIL SERVICE (U 461.49201.3240
*VENOOR TOTAL
UNIFORM RENTAL G01.49440.4170
UNIFORM RENTAL 101 43110.4170
UNIFORM RENTAL 101.43115.4170
UNIFORM RENTALIC1 .43120.4170
UNIFORM RENTAL '01.45201.4170
UNIFORM f(ENTAL 602.49490,4170
MISC OPERATING SUPPLI.S 101.43127.2199
MISC OTHEf( EXPENSE '01.43120.4399
REPAIR & MTC - BUIlDI GS 101.43127.4010
REPAIR & MTC - BUILOI GS 609.49754.4010
*YENOOR TOTAL
MIse OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES
MIse OFFICE SUPPLIES
MIse OFFICE SUPPLIES
DELIVERY MAIL SERVIC
*VENDOR TOTAL.
10: _ 41990,2099
101.41990.2099
101.41990.2099
101.41990.2099
(U 101.43120.3240
140.60 MISC OPERATING SUPPl ES 101.43120.2199
930.05 PROF SRV - CONSTRUCT ON 436.49201.3025
CITY OF I~ONT1CEllO
GL540R-V05.20 PAGE 2
CLAIM INVOICE
POI F/P 10 LINE
702 00056
80038 702 00055
309851 702 00015
:)980 702 000~i2
090498 702 00016
7-526--:J8997 702 00017
7-526-38997 '102 DOOHl
7-526-38997 702 00019
731524
735612
7:19668
739676
7:l9683
702 00120
702 00121
702 00122
702 00123
702 00124
702 00119
702 0011B
'102 00117
702 0011G
702 00115
33525-0
33540~0
::3549-0
33555-0
33604-0
702 0009&
702 00098
702 00097
702 00095
702 00099
0002823-IN
702 00022
1246472-00
702 00023
flRC FINANCW. SYSTtJ-1
\':/2a/98 09:31:5'1
.OOR NAME
OESCRIPTION
GOULD BROS. CHEV""OLOS. C
FIRE-TRUCK REPAIR
GREG L,ARSON SPORTS
PARKS-CAP
HAMCO DAB PRODUCTS
l.l OUc:ri'-SUPPU ES
HARRY'S AUTO SlJPPI.Y
SHOP
P,~RKS
PARKS
SEWER
~)T REEl
SHOP
U BRARY
STREUS
PARKS
HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT
T ~-POT ;',8LE
, ENGINEERING, ING.
WW\P-AUGUST
KEN ANDERSON TRUCKING
19 ANIh1ALS
8 AN n\ALS
KE:N 'S 56 Sc.RVICr.
INSP-VEH MAINT & PARTS
DARKS-VEH R & M
KENNEDY & GRAVEN, CHARTE
FAY-tlIAR
COMM CENTER
b.Lll ED
5T BENEOICTS
BLUE CHIPS
KOVICH/PATRICA
TRAVEL EXPENSES
.'N" R SERVIW.) ". LOCKS
,H-tIIMjTER KEYS
Scheoule of 8111s
AMOlJNT ACCOUNT NAME
FUND & ACCOUNT
290.00 REPAIR & MTC - VEHICLES 10'.42201.&050
11.9B CLOTHING SUPPLIES
84.08 MISC OFF! CE ~)UPPL1 ES
23.40
2.79
3.B7
67.04
4.25
6.39
22 .B3
3.55
0.B5
134.97
12.00
31,014.83
104.50
44,00
148.50
41.55
3,067.96
33.50
97.40
419.40
3,659.81
MISC OPERATING SUPPLIEl
EQlJIPME"T REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT REPAIR PARTS
VEHICLE REPAIR PARTS
MISC OPERATING SUPPLI S
MISC OPERATING SUPPLI S
VEHICLE REPAIR DARTS
EQUIPMENT REPAIR PART'
MISC OPERATING SUpPLIES
*VENOOR TOTAL
101.45201.2111
609.49754.2099
101.4312'1.2199
101.4~i201.WO
101.45201.2210
602.49490,2211
101.43120.2199
101,43127 .2199
101.45201.2211
101.43120.2210
101.45201.2199
MISC PROFESSIONAL SE VIC 501.49440.3199
PROF SRV - ENGINEERING F 436.49201.3030
MISC PROFESSIONAL S RVIC 101.42701.3199
MISC PROFESSIONAL S .RVIC 101.42'101 .:m9
*VENOOR TOTAL
51.20
6.00
57.20
REPAIR & MTC - VEH CLES 101.42401.4050
REPA I R & MTC ... IJE>! CI.Gi , 01 .45201 .4050
*VENOOR TOTAL
MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 213.46524.3199
MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 461.49201.3199
MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 213.45523.3199
MISC PROFESSIONAL SERIJIC 213.46524,3199
MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 213.45524.3199
*VENDOR TOTAL.
79.80 TRAVEL EXPENSE
101.41301.3310
55.56 MISC OPERATING .UPPLIES 101,41940,2199
CITY OF MONTICEL.LO
GL540R-V05.20 PAGE 3
CLAIM INVOICE
PO~ FIP 10 LINE
CVC856233
702 00020
1 54459
102 00024
B4942
702 00026
751218
'151604
151606
'151845
751B52
'{52775
753142
754014
755142
'102 ()()08~i
702 00083
702 00082
102 00081
'102 000B6
702 oooeo
'102 00079
702 00078
102 000B4
80842
702 00125
164-14463
702 00025
15
24
702 00076
702 00077
702 00126
'102 00171
26HO
26'141
26'142
26743
267H
702 00029
702 00030
702 00031
"f02 00027
702 Ooon
JUNE-NOV 199B
'102 000'1
7152
702 001:
BRC ~INANCIAL SYSTEM
11/24/98 09:31 :57
.DOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
LOCH JEWELERS
PLANNING-PLAOUES
PLANNING-PLAQUES
~L8, p,
FIRE
FIRE
~nREETS-FUEL
MARTIE'S FARM SERVICE
PAR~S-SUPPLI ES
HRA-RYEGRASS
MONTICEl.LO CHAMBER OF CO
COMM CENTER-SIGN
MONTICELLO PRINTING
INSP-NOTICES
CH-LABELS
.':C DEV-BUSINESS CARDS
LANNING
MONTICEl.LO TIMES
LEGAL
Bl.DG PERMIT
CH-INFO AD
WATER FLUSHING
RECYL!NG
INTERNET
LlOUOR-ADV
COMM CENTER-PUBLIC INFO
FIRHNFO
MOORES EXCAVATING
r.ARM-DIG OUT POND
OLSON, USSET & WEINGARDE
HWY 25
COMM CENTER
GENERA,L. L.EGAL
K,j El.LBERG-LEGAL.
HOSP IT AL.LEGAL
.
Schedule of 8ills
AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME
154.50
74,66
229.16
22.28
16.50
804.38
843.16
19.33
37.43
56.76
10.00
139.52
52,66
31.42
112.25
335.85
2,585.20
124.50
124.50
49.80
74.70
350.00
101. 15
161.85
413.33
3,985.03
180.00
535.50
663.00
289.00
841. 50
255.00
2.584.00
MISC OTHER EXPENSE
MISC OTHER EXPENSE
*VENDOR TOTAL
MOTOR FUELS
MOTOR FUEL.S
MOTOR FUELS
*VENDOR TOTAL
r.UND Iii ACCOUNT
101,41910.4399
101.41910.4399
101.42201.2120
101.42201.2120
101.43120.2120
MISC OPERATING SUPPL ES 101.45201.2199
MISC OTHER EXPENSE 213.46301,4399
*VENDOR TOTAL
GENERAL PUBLIC INFOR ATI 461.49201.3520
PRINTED FORMS Iii PAPE
PRINTED FORMS & PAPE
PRINTED FORMS & PAPE
PRINTED FORMS & PAPE
*VENDOR TOTAL
101.42401. 2030
101.41301.2030
250.46501.2030
101.41910.2030
LEGAL NOTICE PUBLICA ION 101.41601.3510
GENERAL. PUBLIC INFOR AT! 101.42401.3520
GENERAL PUBLIC INFOR ATI 101.41301.3520
GENERAL PUBLIC INFOR ATI 601.49440.3520
GENERAL PUBLIC INFO MATI 101.43230.3520
GENERAL PUBLIC INFO MATI 101.41910.3520
ADVERTISING 609.49754.3499
GENEflAL. PUBLIC INFO MATI 461,49201.3520
GENERAL PUBLIC INFO. MATI 101.42201.3520
*YENDOR TOTAL.
BIO$OLIDS FARM IMPR VEME 602.49480.4385
PROF SRV .. LEGAL FE S
PROF SRV - LEGAL FE 5
PROF SRV - LEGAL FE S
PROF SRY - LEGAL FE~
PROF SRV - l.EGAL FE S
*VENDOR TOTAL
450.49201.3040
461.49201,3040
101.41601.3040
101.41601,3040
101.41601,3040
CLAIM INVOICE
119327
736885
2'1'157
27809
27877
315658
316354
98,-106
7975-000001'1
7975-000001'1
7975'-000001'1
CITY OF MONTICEl.LO
GL.540R-V05.20 PAGE 4
PO# FIP ID l.INE
702 00033
'102 ooon
702 00088
702 00087
702 00035
702 00036
'102 00037
702 00109
702 00089
702 00090
702 00091
702 ooon
702 00041
702 00042
702 00043
702 00044
702 00045
702 00046
70200047
702 00048
702 00049
702 00034
702 00050
702 00051
702 00106
'102 00107
702 00108
8RC F INANCIAL SYSTf~M CITY OF MONTICELLO
11/24/98 09:31 :57 SChedule 0 8i l1s GL540R-V05.20 PAGE 5
.OOR NAME AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & AGCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE PO# F/P ID LINE
DESCRIPTION
PATCH/FRED
COAT & BOOTS 181.00 MOTOR FUELS 101.42401.2120 702 00102
PLANNERS BOOK SERVICE
PLANNING-SU8CRIPTION 34.95 DUES, MEMBERSHIP & SU SC 101.41910.4330 702 00110
PLA~T & FLANGED EQUIPMEN
WWTP-BRACE 168.11 MISC REPAIR & MTC SUP LI 436.49201.2299 0020093-- IN 702 00053
PfWFESS IONAL SERV ICES GR
WWTP 35,360.50 PROF SRV - PSG, INC 602.49480.3080 DECEMBER 702 00054
1~f.L r.~8LE CORPORATION/THE
FINftNCE-SORTER 27.86 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES 101.41920.2099 MWP08000 702 00069
[-'INANCE-RIBBON 12.76CR MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES 101.41920.2099 YHY39098 702 00070
15.10 *VENDOR TOTAL
RELIANCE DATA CORPORA T 10
DA p, P ROC m.36 PROF SRV - DATA PROCE, SI 101.41920.3090 102 00068
DATA PROC 1,005.95 PROF SRV .. DATA PROCES 51 101.41920.3090 22667 702 00067
1,159.31 *VENDOR TOTAL
.HARD & SYLVIA CLINE
NTWN REDEV-DMRF #104 180.12 GRANT APPROPRIATIONS 250.46501.4340 702 00021
ROYAL PRINTING & OFFICE
AN SHELTER-SUPPLIES 63.31 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES 101.42701.2099 702 00059
PW-OFFICE SUPPLIES 21.53 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES 101.43110.2099 702 00060
RIVERSIDE CEMETARY-SUPP 25.63 MISe OTHER EXPENSE 651.49010.4399 702 00061
WWTP-CARTRIDGE 40.42 PROF SRV - CONSTRUCTIO 436.49201.3025 702 00062
O,A,RKS-'SlJPPLIES 51.14 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIS 101.45201.2199 702 00063
SHADE TREE-SUPPLIES 41.34 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIE 224.46102.2199 702 00064
OW-COpy PAPER 117.15 DUPLICATING & COPY SUP L 101.43110.2020 702 00065
P~I-SUPPLIES 354.85 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES 101.43110.2099 702 00066
715.37 *VENDOR TOTAL
RUDOLPH'S, INC
FARM-DISK & TIRES 10,117.50 BIOSOLIDS FARM IMPROVE , E 602. 494BO .4385 702 00071
SCHIlHWAERT LANDSCAPING
CLEARING TREES & DEBRIS 4,774.25 1997 STORM DAMAGE EXPENS 101.42501.4401 8536 702 00073
SHARE CORPORATION
STREETS-VEH REPAIR 469.09 MIse OPERATING SUPPLIES 101.43127.2199 220461 702 00013
SONIC COURIER
COMM CENTER-CARRIER 51. BO DELIVERY MAIL SERVICE ( J 461.49201.3240 1082 702 00072
eVE'S El.K RIVER NURSER
ARKS-HNDSCAPE FABRIC 410.82 LANDSCAPING MATERIALS 101.45201.2250 0011111 702 00074
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF MONTICELLO
: 1/24/98 09:31:57 Schedule t 8'il'! s GL540R-V05.20 PAGE 6
.DOR NAME
DESCrUPTlON AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME i:UND & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE PO# FIP 10 LINE
TAYLOR LAND SURVEYORS IN
SURVEY K SHULTZ PROP 500.00 MISC PROFESSIONAL SER VIC 101,41910,3199 98408 702 00100
UPBEAT, INC
[)EP REG-ASH URN 154.77 SMALL TOOLS & EOU I PM NT 101.41990.2410 00268464 702 00103
US ~!LTER-WATERPRO
HOSP IT AL METER 2.603.75 PROF SRV - ENGINEERI G F 101.41910.3030 479997 '102 00101
WALOOR PUMP & EQUIPMENT
WWTP,-PUMfJ RENTAL 308.85 REPAIR & MTC - MACH EQ 436,49201.4044 50087 702 00094
WILSON DEVELOPMENT SERVI
COMM CENTER 2,211. 76 MISC PROFESSIONAL SE VIC 461.49201.3199 702 00130
TH 25 3,6'13.51 MISe PROFESSIONAl. Sf VIC 4S0.49201.3199 SEPT & OCT 702 0012rJ
5,885.27 *VENDOR TOTAL
ZARNOTH BRUSH WORKS, [NC
STREETS-BROOM REFILL 338.67 MISC OPERATING SUPPLI ES 101.43120.2199 30457 702 00104
.
.
8RC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
11/24/90 09:31:57
.OOR NAME
OESCQ] PTION
REPORT TOTALS:
.
.
Scheaule of ills
AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME
FUND & ACCOUNT
336,849.15
RECORDS PRINTED - 000128
CLAIM INVOICE
CITY OF MONTICELLO
GL540R-Y05.20 PAGE 7
POI F/P ID LINE
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
11/24/98 09:31 :59
Scnedule of Bills
eND RECAP:
FUND DESCRI PTION
'101 GENERAL FUND
213 HRA FUND
224 SHADE TREE FUND
250 ECONOMIC OEVEl.OPMENT AUTH FD
136 93-14C WWTP EXPANSION PRJ
450 96-04C HWY25/MNDOT IMPR
161 9B-03C COMMUNITY CENTER
462 98-12C 7TH STREET EXTENSION
(i01 WATER FUND
602 SEWER FUND
(iOg MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND
651 RIVERSIDE CEMETERY
TOTA.LALL FUNDS
BANK RECAP:
el( NAME
GENL GENERAL CHECKING
UQR LIQUOR CHECKING
TOT AL ALL BANKS
DlSBU SEMENTS
28,441.56
629.28
141. 34
211.54
32,474. 51
4,209.01
222,594.66
1.099.00
164.74
46,606.97
250.91
25.63
33 .849~15
DIS81 RSEI~ENTS
33 ,598.24
250.91
33 ,849.15
THE PRECEDING LIST OF BILLS PAYABLE WAS RE [EWED AND APPROVED FOR PAYMENT~
DATE ." . . . .. " ..
APPROVED BY
e
+< ++.... ...'.'., +.., .. +,...... +++
.. .. .. . .. . ,. . .. .. . .. .. . ~ . . , .' .. .. .. . . . .. .. .. .. .' .
CITY OF !~ONTICELt.O
GL060S-V05.20 RECAPPAGE
GL540R
aRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
12/02/98 16:09:36
Schedule of Bills
CI Y OF MONTICELLO
GL050S- 05.20 COVERPAGE
GL540R
.
Report Selection:
RUN GROUP... M1130D COMMENT... 11/30 MANUAL CKS
DATA-JE-ro
DATA COMMENT
-------------- ------------------------
M-11301998-712 11/30 MANUAL CKS
Run Instructions:
Jobq Banner Copies Form Printer Hold Space LPI Lines CPI
J 01 Y S 6 066 10
.
.
-. --. .--..-- -. '.-.- - --. -
- - - -
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
12/02/98 16:09:37
Schedu e of Bflls
.NOOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
CITY OF MONTICELL
GL540R-V05.20 PAGE
AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME
ADOLFSON & PETERSON, INe
MiTP-SEPTEMBER 136.452.32 436.49201.3025
AUTOMATIC SYSTEMS CO.~ ~
WWTP-PANELVIEW ~. ~ I,S:pt5 R PROF SRV - CONSTRU TION 436.49201.3025
SEWER-WWTP-PANElVIEW V 1 ,59.7 0 REPAIR & MTC _ MACH & EQ 602.49480.4044
~\ . *VENDOR TOTAL
FUND & ACCOUNT
CLAIM INVOICE
PO# F/P 10 LINE
712 00016
09049 S
09049 S
CARDINAL/DARYL & MICHELE
PARCEL #48 - EASEMENT
CUTLER-MANNER, INC ;v5n~r9.~
WWTP-R & "I cY. . f}
SEWER-RIM (
ERICKSON/JOEL AND JANET
PET HOSPITAL-EASEMENT
712 00003
712 00004
830.00 lAND
450.49201.5101
5'1(..4 PROF SRV - CONSTRUCT ON 436.49201.3025
5,791 8 REPAIR & MTC - MACH & EQ 602.49480.4044
.0 *VENDOR TOTAL
712 00047
7693537
7693537
712 00001
712 00002
9,965.00 LAND
450.49201.5101
712 00051
lAND
LAND
*VENDOR TOTAL
461.49201.5101
240.49201.5101
4lIIITNER'S OFFICE PRODUCT
DEP REG
CH-OFFICE SUPPLIES
DEP REG
CH-OFFICE SUPPLIES
DEP REG
CH-OFFICE SUPPLIES
712 00048
712 00049
1,974.53CR
1,974.53
304.86CR
304.86
747.04CR
747.04
0.00
MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES
*VENDOR TOTAL
101.41990.2099
101.41301.2099
101.41990.2099
101.41301.2099
01.41990.2099
01.41301.2099
712 00009
712 00010
712 00011
712 00012
712 00013
712 00014
HINRICH PROPERTIES
PARCEL 20A-EASEMENT
2,390.00 LAND
KJELLBERG'S
PARCEL 44 & 47 EASEMENT
4 0.49201.5101
239000
1,465.00 LAND
712 00050
LLC OCHlO
PARCEL 42,43,45,46
45 .49201.5101
4,825.00 LAND
712 00052
ACK/RALPH & BEV
WATER & PATHWAY EASEMENT
45049201.5101
712 00053
900.00 LAND
.RQUETTE BANK MONTICELL
TRANSFER TO 4M FUND
464. 9201.5101
250,000.00 INVESTMENTS
712 00055
BUILDING OFFICIAL
.lDG-BI-MONTHL Y MEETING
955.10401
712 00044
15.00 CONFERENCE & SCHOOLS
101.4 401.3320
712 00015
AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME
1,606.00 DNR PAYABLE
993.00 DNR PAYABLE
844.00 DNR PAYABLE
3,443.00 *VENDOR TOTAL
1,539.36 LICENSES & PERMITS
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
12/02/98 16:09:37
.NDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
MN DEPART OF NATURAL RES
TITLES & REGISTRATIONS
WATERCRAFT TITLES & REG
TITLES & REGISTRATIONS
MONTICELLO DEPUTY REG #0
SALES TAX & TITLE FEE
RIVER TERRACE PARK
REFUND
4TH QTR 97 REFUND
Schedule f Bills
FUND & ACCOUNT
101.20811
101.20811
101.20811
101.45201.4370
10.40 S. A. PRINCIPAL - IRECT 601.36102
25.60 OTHER MISC REVENUE 101.36299
36.00 *VENDOR TOTAL
SECRUITY PRODUCTS COM PAN
PARKS-BAL DUE CAMERA 1,012.01 OTHER EQUIPMENT 101.45201.5801
TRI-STATE PUMP & CONTROL ^~~~.
WATER ~?cJf'~~' R EQUIPMENT REPAIR P RTS 601.49440.2210
SEWER-REPAIR ' 5 . 2 REPAIR & MTC - MAC & EQ 602.49490.4044
0.0 *VENDOR TOTAL
"-
.DOR PUMP & EQUIPMENJ.-t) ,
ATER-FLOATS REPAIR _v;rS ~.55' REPAIR & MTC - MA H & EQ 601.49440.4044
SEWER-FLOATS REPAIR UV~{t' . 28 5 REPAIR & MTC - MA H & EQ 602.49490.4044
, '\j O. *VENDOR TOTAL
WOLTERS/MELVIN C.
PARCEL lA 1,330.00 LAND 450.49201.5101
WRIGHT COUNTY RECORDER
CK VOID-ST HENRY
BAKKEN EASEMENT
CC MANOR PARK
ST HENRY'S
ST HENRY'S
ST HENRY'S
ST HENRY'S
ST HENRY'S
ST HENRY'S
ST HENRY'S
MACK-EASEMENT
136.50CR
19.50
19.50
19.50
19.50
19.50
19.50
19.50
19.50
19.50
19.50
58.50
WRIGHT COUNTY TREAS/AUDI
CK VOID-ST HENRY'S
BAKKEN EASEMENT
CC MANOR PARK
.. T HENRY'S
T HENRY'S
ST HENRY'S
46.55CR
6.65
6.65
6.65
6.65
6.65
MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 101.41910.3199
MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 101.41910.3199
MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 101.41910.3199
MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 101.41910.3199
MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 101.41910.3199
MISC PROFESSIONA SERVIC 101.41910.3199
MISC PROFESSIONA SERVIC 101.41910.3199
MISC PROFESSIONA SERVIC 101.41910.3199
MISC PROFESSIONA SERVIC 101.41910.3199
MISC PROFESSIONA SERVIC 101.41910.3199
MISC PROFESSIONA SERVIC 101.41910.3199
*VENDOR TOTAL
MISC PROFESSIONA SERVIC 101.41910.3199
MISC PROFESSIONA SERVIC 101.41910.3199
MISC PROFESSIONA SERVIC 101.41910.3199
MISC PROFESSIONA SERVIC 101.41910,3199
MISC PROFESSIONA SERVIC 101.41910.3199
MISC PROFESSIONA SERVIC 101.41910.3199
CLAIM INVOICE
PARKS-l TON
16605
16605
48424, 48595
48424, 48595
CITY OF MONTICELLO
GL540R-V05.20 PAGE 2
PO# F/P ID LINE
712 00018
712 00019
712 00045
712 00046
712 00020
712 00021
712 00017
712 00007
712 00008
712 00005
712 00006
712 00054
712 00024
712 00025
712 00027
712 0003~
712 OOOl,
712 0003~
712 00031
712 00041
712 0004
712 0004'
712 0004:
712 0002
712 0002
712 0002
712 0002
712 0003
712 OOO~
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
12/02/98 16:09:37
eNOOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
Schedule of Bills
AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME
WRIGHT COUNTY TREAS/AUOI
ST HENRY'S
ST HENRY'S
ST HENRY'S
ST HENRY'S
CK VOID-CC MANOR PARK
FUND & ACCOUNT
6.65 MISC PROFESSIONAL ERVIC 101.41910.3199
6.65 MISC PROFESSIONAL ERVIC 101.41910.3199
6.65 MISC PROFESSIONAL ERVIC 101.41910.3199
6.65 MISe PROFESSIONAL ERVIC 101.41910.3199
6.65CR MISC PROFESSIONAL ERVIC 101.41910.3199
6.65 *VENOOR TOTAL
.
.
CLAIM INVOICE
EASEMENT
CITY OF MONTICELLO
GL540R-V05.20 PAGE 3
PO# F/P 10 LINE
712 00032
712 00033
712 00034
712 00035
712 00022
-.-"- --"-- -- --~ --. --. -
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
12/02/98 16:09:38
.ND RECAP;
FUND DESCRIPTION
101 GENERAL FUND
240 CAPITAL PROJECT REVOLVING FD
436 93-14C WWTP EXPANSION PRJ
450 96-04C HWY25/MNDOT IMPR
461 98-03C COMMUNITY CENTER
464 98-24C BOOSTER PUMP/WW RIDGE
601 WATER FUND
602 SEWER FUND
955 INVESTMENT HOLDING FUND
TOTAL ALL FUNDS
BANK RECAP:
BANK NAME
~L GENERAL CHECKING
TOTAL ALL BANKS
Schedule of ills
CITY OF MONTICELLO
GL060S-V05.20 RECAPPAGE
GL540R
DISBUR EMENTS
6,100.12
21. 87.20
129. 63.34
20. 05.00
21. 87.20 CR
00.00
05.57 CR
8, 04.95
250. 00.00
414, 67.84
DISBUR EMENTS
414, 67.84
414, 67.84
THE PRECEDING LIST OF BILLS PAYABLE WAS REVI WED AND APPROVED FOR PAYMENT.
DATE ............
~
APPROVED BY
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
12/02/98 16:09:31
eNDOR NAME
_ _ DESCRIPTION
REPORT TOTALS:
.
.
AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME
414,261.84
RECORDS PRINTED - 000055
Schedule of Bills
FUND & ACCOUNT
CLAIM INVOICE
CITY OF MONTICELLO
GL540R-V05.20 PAGE 4
PO~ F/P ID LINE
----~~~ --" --
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
12/10/98 15:34:05
.
Schedule of Bills
CITY OF MONTICEllO
Gl05 S-V05.20 COVERPAGE
Gl54 R
Report Selection:
RUN GROUP... 01211 COMMENT... 12/11 CKS
OATA-JE-IO
OA T A COMMEN T
-------------- ------------------------
0-12111998-720 12/11 CKS
Run Instructions:
Jobq Banner Copies Form Printer Hold Space lPI lines cpr
J 01 Y S 6 066 10
.
.
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF MONTlCELL
12/10/98 15:34:06 Schedu e of Bills GL540R-V05.20 PAGE
~VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE POlt F/P ID LINE
A T & T WIRELESS SERVICE
RICK W 38.75 TELEPHONE 101.41301.3210 720 0001
.~*"~O 27.77 TELEPHONE 101.41910.3210 720 0001
GARY A .)JQ 27.77 TELEPHONE 101.42401.3210 720 0001
~She >1 27.77 TELEPHONE 101~210 720 0001
122.06 *VENDOR TOTAL idl1()f
ADVISORS MARKETING GROUP
PARKS-INFORMATION 95.00 MISC OPERATING S PPLI ES 101.45201.2199 9650 720 00Q1,
ALBERG/KELLEEN
OAA-JOINT PLANNING BRD 205.68 SALARIES. OTHER 230.46401.1090 1998 720 0000.
ARAMARK
CH-SUPPLI ES 65.00 MISC OPERATING S PPLIES 101.41940.2199 6013-861419 720 0001:
ARCON CONSTRUCTION CO IN
CONTRACT PAYABLE 10,564.71 CONTRACTS PAYABL 453.20601 #2 720 00041
MONTICELLO HIGH SCHOOL 10,506.57 PROF SRV - CONST UCTION 453.49201.3025 2 720 0030'
21,071.28 *VENDOR TOTAL
BADGE A MINIT
~PLANNING-BADGE EQUIP 85.85 MISC OPERATING S PPLI ES 101.41910.2199 Z8775 720 0001f
BERNICK'S PEPSI COLA COM
TAXABLE MISC 8.70 MISC TAXABLE 609.49750.2540 15939 720 0002:
BEER 552.60 BEER 609.49750.2520 15940 7200002,
TAXABLE MISC 59.40 MISC TAXABLE 609.49750.2540 19249 720 0002:
BEER 76.75 BEER 609.49750.2520 19250 720 ooor
BEER 549.00 BEER 609.49750.2520 21781 720 00021
1.246.45 *VENOOR TOTAL
CEDAR ST. GARDEN CENTER
CH-CHRISTMAS TREE 26.61 MISC OPERATING SU PLIES 101.41301.2199 0003029 720 0002',
CEDRUS CREEK CRAFTSMAN,
CERT OF COMPLETION 32,500.00 MISC OTHER EXPENS 213.46520.4399 PRAIRIE WEST 720 000,.,
CELLULAR 2000 OF ST CLOU
FIRE DEPT 5.40 TELEPHONE 101.42201.3210 720 0001f
GARY A 370.33 TELEPHONE 101.42401.3210 720 0001'
MATT T 10.70 TELEPHONE 601.49440.3210 720 0002(
386.43 *VENOOR TOTAL
CENTRAL MINN INITIATIVE
CMIF GRANT REIMB 1.100.21 GRANT REIMBURSEME T 223.46501.6601 720 00021
4111JHAMPION AMERICA INC.
PARKS-BLOG REPAIR SUPP 35.00 BUILDING REPAIR S PPLIES 101.45201.2230 366930 720 0002[
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF MONTICELl
12/10/98 15:34:06 Schedu e of Bills GL540R-V05.20 PAGE
.VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE POll F/P 10 UNf
CHAMPION AMERICA INC.
PARKS-BLDG REPAIR SUPP 80.45 BUILDING REPAI R UPPLIES 101.45201.2230 367042 720 000:;
115.45 *VENDOR TOTAL
DAHLHEIMER DISTRIBUTING
BEER 4,616.80 BEER 609.49750.2520 36285 720 0003
TAX MISC 18.60 MISC TAXABLE '609.49750.2540 36286 720 0003
BEER 4,000.50 BEER 609.49750.2520 36664 720 0003
TAX MISC 125.50 MISC TAXABLE 609.49750.2540 36665 720 0003
BEER 401.45 BEER 609.49750.2520 36895 720 0003
BEER 2,381.20 BEER 609.49750.2520 37040 720 0003
TAX MISC 102.10 MISC TAXABLE 609.49750.2540 37041 720 0003
TAX MISC 125.00 MISC TAXABLE 609.49750.2540 37397 720 0003
BEER 1.576.15 BEER 609.49750.2520 37405 720 0003
TAX MISC 11.70 MISC TAXABLE 609.49750.2540 37408 720 0003
13,359.00 *VENDOR TOTAL
DAVIES WATER EQUIPMENT C
WATER-UTIL SYSTEM SUPP 1,429.65 UTILITY SYSTEM M CE SUPP 601.49440.2270 17746 720 0004
PARK-SUPPU ES 839.69 MISC REPAIR & MT SUPPLI 101.45201.2299 17746 720 0004
WATER-UTIL SYS SUPPLIES 134.89 UTILITY SYSTEM M CE SUPP 601.49440.2270 17762 720 0004
PARK-SUPPLIES 126.76 MISC REPAIR & MT SUPPLI 101.45201.2299 17762 720 0004
. 2,530.99 *VENDOR TOTAL
DAY DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
BEER 541. 40 BEER 609.49750.2520 47511 720 0004
BEER 2,218.70 BEER 609.49750.2520 48099 720 0004
BEER 455.00 BEER 609.49750.2520 48499 720 0004
3,215.10 *VENDOR TOTAL
DEHN TREE CO
STORM-LOGS & BRUSH 16,161.34 1997 STORM DAMAG EX PENS 101.42501.4401 720 0004:
DENN/FRANKLIN
OAA-JOINT PLANNING BRD 160.00 SALARIES, OTHER 230.46401.1090 1998 720 0000.
DESIGN FOR PRINT STUDIO
PLANNING-BUTTON DESIGN 50.00 MISC OPERATING SU PPLIES 101.41910.2199 720 0004'
DIXON/LINDA
OAA-JOINT PLANNING BRO. 47.00 SALARIES, OTHER 230.46401.1090 1998 720 0000:
DONLAR CONSTRUCTION COMP
COMM CENTER- PAYMENT 111 94.555.40 PROF SRV - CONSTR CTION 461.49201.3025 720 0030',
DOlY/KAREN
TRAVEL EXPENSE 75.00 TRAVEL EXPENSE 101.41301.3310 720 0005C
.LK RIVER BITUMINOUS INC
STREETS-AC FINES 79.88 MISC OPERATING SU PLIES 101.43120.2199 720 00051
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF MONTICELL
12/10/98 15:34:06 Schedu e of Bills GL540R-V05.20 PAGE
~VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE PO# F/P ID LINE
EMERGITEK CORPORATION
FIRE-TANKER REPAIR 129.84 EQUIPMENT REPAIR P ARTS 101.42201.2210 4062 720 0005:
FAIR/WILLIAM
OAA-JOINT PLANNING BRD 160.00 SALARIES, OTHER 230.46401.1090 1998 720 OOOOi
FERBER, INC
SIDEWALK WALNUT & ELM 4,429.89 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 101.41910.3199 PO 3100 720 0023E
WWTP SIDEWALK 1,511.25 PROF SRV - CONSTR CTION 436.49201.3025 PO 3100 720 00231
5,941. 14 *VENDOR TOTAL
FLESCH'S PAPER SERVICES,
LI QUOR-SUPPLI ES 77.60 MISC OPERATING SU PLI ES 609.49754.2199 1165070 720 00053
FRIE/RICHARD
OAA-JOINT PLANNING BRD 140.00 SALARIES, OTHER 230.46401.1090 1998 720 00009
G & K SERVICES
DEP REG-RUGS 36.89 REPAIR & MTC - BUI LDINGS 101.41990.4010 720 00054
PH-RUGS 65.68 REPAIR & MTC - BUI LDINGS 101.43127.4010 720 00055
PW INSP 71. 61 UN I FORM RENTAL 101.43115.4170 720 00061
STREETS 84.33 UNIFORM RENTAL 101.43120.4170 720 00062
~ PARKS 181.20 UNIFORM RENTAL 101.45201.4170 720 00063
PW ADM 20.43 UNIFORM RENTAL 101.43110.4170 743776 720 00060
WATER 45.94 UNIFORM RENTAL 601.49440.4170 747814 120 00059
SEWER 41.93 UNIFORM RENTAL 602.49490.4170 751924 720 00058
SHOP TOWELS 40.05 MISC OPERATING SUP LIES 101.43127.2199 756010 720 00057
ENV CHARGE, SALES TAX 70.45 MISC OTHER EXPENSE 101.43120.4399 756011 720 00056
664.51 *VENDOR TOTAL
GALL'S INC
PARKS-RECORDER & TAPES 71. 64 MISC OPERATING SUP LIES 101.45201.2199 52101699 720 00064
GENERAL RENTAL CENTER
COMM CENTER-GRD BRKING 50.08 MISC OTHER EXPENSE 461.49201.4399 21203 120 00065
COMM CENTER-GRD BRKING 14.55 MISC OTHER EXPENSE 461.49201.4399 604301 720 00066
124.63 *VENDOR TOTAL
GLUNZ/RAYMOND J
HAUGEN-GRAVE OPENING 355.00 PROF SRV - EXCAVAT I N 651.49010.3115 720 00067
GRIGGS, COOPER & COMPANY
DEL CHARGE 4.50 FREIGHT 609.49750.3330 91956 720 00069
WINE 274.98 WINE 609.49150.2530 91956 720 00079
DEL CHARGE 2.25 FREIGHT 609.49750.3330 91957 120 00076
LI QUOR 312.85 LI QUOR 609.49750.2510 91957 720 00088
DEL CHARGE 30.00 FREIGHT 609.49750.3330 91958 720 00070
~ WINE 1,116.18 WINE 609.49150.2530 91958 120 00080
DEL CHARGE 28.50 FREIGHT 609.49750.3330 91959 720 00071
LIQUOR 2,828.43 LI QUOR 609.49150.2510 91959 120 00089
- -- ----.- -.--. - ----
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF MONTICELLl
12/10/98 15:34:06 Schedul of Bills GL540R-V05.20 PAGE
~ENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE PO# F/P 10 LINE
JOHNSON BROS WHOLESALE L
FREIGHT CHARGE 6.24 FREIGHT 609.49750,3330 916456 720 00105
LIQUOR 724.77 LI QUOR 609.49750.2510 916456 720 00110
FREIGHT CHARGE 21. 19 FREIGHT 609.49750.3330 916457 720 00101
WINE 813.10 WINE 609.49750.2530 916457 720 00106
3,866.44 *VENDOR TOTAL
K MART STORE
PARKS-OP SUPPLIES 54.03 MISC OPERATING SUP LIES 101.45201.2199 720 00111
CH-OFFICE SUPPLIES 10.13 MISC OFFICE SUPPLI S 101.41301.2099 720 00112
PARKS-FLOOR MATS 63.86 EQUIPMENT REPAIR P RTS 101.45201.2210 720 00113
128.02 *VENDOR TOTAL
KEARIN/WILLIAM F
BITZER-CREMATION 55.00 MISC PROFESSIONAL ERVIC 651.49010.3199 720 00114
KRAEMER/WANDA
TRAVEL EXPENSE 49.60 TRAVEL EXPENSE 101.41910.3310 720 00115
LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS
PARKS-WC INS 1,489.00 WORKER'S COMP INS P EMIU 101.49240.1510 02-000523-12 720 00116
FIRE 8.00CR MISC GENERAL INSURA CE 101.42201.3699 02-000523-12 720 00117
. WATER 186.00 MISC GENERAL INSURA CE 601.49440.3699 02-000523-12 720 00118
LI QUOR 475.00 MISC GENERAL INSURA CE 609.49754.3699 02-000523-12 720 00119
2,142.00 *VENDOR TOTAL
LHB ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS
STORM-SITE VISITS 350.00 1997 STORM DAMAGE E PENS 101.42501.4401 0000006 720 00120
MINNEGASCO
LI QUOR 69.07 GAS 609.49754.3830 720 00124
HRA-3 WALNUT STREET 37.80 GAS 213.46522.3830 720 00125
106.87 *VENDOR TOTAL
MN ANIMAL CONTROL ASSOCI
AN SHELTER-DUES 25.00 DUES, MEMBERSHIP & S BSC 101.42701.4330 1999 DUES 720 00121
MN COpy SYSTEMS INC
FIRE-COPIER M/A 31.95 MAINTENANCE AGREEMEN S 101.42201.3190 73139 720 00122
MN DEPART OF NATURAL RES
WATERCRAFT TITLE & REG 739.00 DNR PAYABLE 101.20811 720 00238
MN GOV FINANCE OFICERS A
CATHY-DUES 30.00 DUES, MEMBERSHIP & S U SC 101.41520.4330 720 00123
MONTICELLO COMMUNITY EDU
. COMM ED-SUMMER PROG 17,500.00 MISC PROFESSIONAL SE R IC 101.45176.3199 720 00131
- .'-'.- -" - -
.- ,- - ,- ----
-, -" '-,- - .-'-
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF MONTlCELll
12/10/98 15:34:06 Schedule of Bills GL540R-V05.20 PAGE
.ENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE PO# F /P 10 LINE
NORTHWEST ASSOC CONSULTA
ST BENEDICTS 357.97 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 101.41910.3199 720 oom
ROLLING WOODS 393.00 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 101.41910.3199 8286 720 0016;:
LYMAN DEV 494.55 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 101.41910.3199 8287 720 00163
MEETI NGS 1,050.00 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 101.41910.3199 8288 720 00161
7,104.33 *VENDOR TOTAL
NORTHWEST CARPET & UPHOL
CLEAN CARPETS 308.85 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 609.49754.3199 720 00176
PAUL KUNDE
PBLC HRING REIMB 50.00 VARIANCES/CONDITI NAL US 101.32212 720 00130
PAUSTlS & SONS
WINE 2,477.88 WINE 609.49750.2530 100181 720 00177
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
FREIGHT CHARGE 14.04 FREIGHT 609.49750.3330 444051 720 00185
1,120.60 LI QUOR 609.49750.2510 444051 720 00193
FREIGHT CHARGE 14.82 FREIGHT 609.49750.3330 444052 720 00180
WINE 723.00 WINE 609.49750.2530 444052 720 00188
. FREIGHT CHARGE 1.56 FREIGHT 609.49750.3330 444803 720 00179
WINE 164.00 WINE 609.49750.2530 444803 720 00187
FREIGHT CHARGE 8.58 FREIGHT 609.49750.3330 445038 720 00178
WINE 461.80 WINE 609.49750.2530 445038 720 00186
FREIGHT CHARGE 0.78 FREIGHT 609.49750.3330 446554 720 00184
99.99 LIQUOR 609.49750.2510 446554 720 00192
FREIGHT CHARGE 3.12 FREIGHT 609.49750.3330 446555 720 00181
WINE 165.25 WINE 609.49750.2530 446555 720 00189
FREIGHT CHARGE 42.45 FREIGHT 609.49750.3330 447889 720 00183
LIQUOR 4,715.88 LIQUOR 609.49750.2510 447889 720 00191
FREIGHT CHARGE 2.54 FREIGHT 609.49750.3330 447890 720 00182
WINE 112.01 WINE 609.49750.2530 447890 720 00190
7,650.42 *VENDOR TOTAL
PHOTO I
WWTP-FILM 14.26 PROF SRV - CONSTRU CION 436.49201.3025 16596 720 00194
NEWSLETTER 25.25 NEWSLETTER 101.41301.3195 16624 720 00196
WWTP-FILM 13.79 PROF SRV - CONSTRU CION 436.49201.3025 16690 720 00195
53.30 *VENDOR TOTAL
PIRAM/TERRIE
OAA-JOINT PLANNING BRD 130.00 SALARIES, OTHER 230.46401.1090 1998 720 00002
QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS C
WINE 1,633.99 WINE 609.49750.2530 660134 720 00197
WINE 3,953.83 LIQUOR 609.49750.2510 660134 720 0019B
. WINE 380.07 LI QUOR 609.49750.2510 660624 720 00199
5.967.89 *VENDOR TOTAL
-----., ---"-- - --
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF MONTICELLC
12/10/98 15:34:06 Schedul of Bills GL540R-V05.20 PAGE E
.ENDOR NAME
DESCRI PTION AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE PO# F/P 10 LINE
R & 0 SALES. INC.
PARKS-CAPS 27.00 UNIFORM RENTAL 101.45201.4170 15095 720 00200
RON'S GOURMET ICE
ICE 105.84 MISC TAXABLE 609.49750.2540 26946 720 00201
SALKOWSKI/THOMAS
OAA-JOINT PLANNING BRD 518.08 SALARIES. OTHER 230.46401.1090 1998 720 00005
SALZWEDEL/PATRICIA
TRAVEL EXPENSE 70.56 TRAVEL EXPENSE 101.42701.3310 720 00126
OP SUPPLIES 39.29 MISC OPERATING SU PLIES 101.42701.2199 720 00127
CAGES 229.62 SMALL TOOLS & EQUI PMENT 101.42701.2410 720 00129
AN CONTROL CONTRACT 1,197.50 PROF SRV - ANIMAL CTRL 0 101.42701.3120 12/15/98 720 00128
1.536.97 *VENDOR TOTAL
SAWATZKE/PATRICK
OAA-JOINT PLANNING BRD 160.00 SALARIES, OTHER 230.46401.1090 1998 720 00001
SCHARBER & SONS. INC.
PARKS-SUPPLI ES 79.57 VEHICLE REPAIR PAR S 101.45201.2211 193953 720 00202
eUMAN/GREG PROF SRV - CUSTODI L
CH-WINDOW CLEANING 115.00 101.41940.3110 720 00308
SONY ELECTRONICS
(2) CLIPS BELTS 48.82 REPAIR & MTC - MAC & EQ 609.49754.4044 S-Ol M 3231 720 00203
THOM/SHANNON
TRAVEL EXPENSE 26.57 TRAVEL EXPENSE 101.41301.3310 720 00204
THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMP
BEER 396.00 BEER 609.49750.2520 118151 720 00205
BEER 3,142.10 BEER 609.49750.2520 148000 720 00208
MISC TAXABLE 195.80 MISC TAXABLE 609.49750.2540 148001 720 00210
BEER 5,054.40 BEER 609.49750.2520 148615 720 00207
MISC TAXABLE 38.40 MISC TAXABLE 609.49750.2540 148616 720 00209
BEER 12,275.55 BEER 609.49750.2520 149010 720 00206
MISC TAXABLE 94:85 MISC TAXABLE 609.49750.2540 149011 720 00211
21.197.10 *VENDOR TOTAL
TSR WIRELESS - MINNESOTA
WATER 18.54 TELEPHONE 601.49440.3210 720 00212
MATT 45.53 TELEPHONE 602.49490.3210 720 00213
AN SHELTER 16.00 TELEPHONE 101.42701.3210 720 00214
JOHN S 9.27 TELEPHONE 101.43110.3210 720 00215
GARY A 9.27 TELEPHONE 101.42401.3210 720 00216
. TOM B 9.27 TELEPHONE 101.43115.3210 720 00217
ROGER M 9.27 TELEPHONE 101.43120.3210 720 00218
JOHN L 9.27 TELEPHONE 101.45201.3210 720 00219
126.42 *VENDOR TOTAL
---.--. --"-..-- .--. ---. ----- -.--....
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF MONTICELLC
12/10/98 15:34:06 Schedul of Bills GL540R-V05.20 PAGE 9
.ENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE POll F/P ID LINE
U SLINK
CH 264.36 TELEPHONE 101.41301.3210 720 0022l
FIRE HALL 0.22 TELEPHONE 101.42201.3210 720 0022:
AN SHELTER 17.91 TELEPHONE 101.42701.3210 720 oon
PW 1.81 TELEPHONE 101.43110.3210 720 0022:
DEP REG 0.16 TELEPHONE 101.41990.3210 720 0022'
PW INSP 3.82 TELEPHONE 101.43115.3210 720 oon
LI QUOR 7.89 TELEPHONE 609.49754.3210 720 OOW
296.17 *VENDOR TOTAL
U S POSTAL SERVICE
CH-POSTAGE FOR METER 2,000.00 POSTAGE 101.41301.3220 ACCT 26272021 720 0022'
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
GARY A-CONFERENCE 180.00 101.42401.3320 720 0022:
US WEST DIRECTORY ADVERT
(2) PHONE BOOKS 24.85 MISC OPERATING S PPLlES 609.49754.2199 00000508136 720 0022
VIKING COCA COLA
CH 87.33 MISC OTHER EXPEN E 101.43110.4399 2178658 720 0023
. TAX MISC 66.95 MISC TAXABLE 609.49750.2540 2183234 720 0023
TAX MISC 205.15 MISC TAXABLE 609.49750.2540 2184830 720 0023
359.43 *VENDOR TOTAL
WATSON COMPANY, INC/THE
TAX MISC 487.74 MISC TAXABLE 609.49750.2540 530385 720 0023
WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITOR-TR
SCERG GRANT REIMB 2,760.51 GRANT REIMBURSEM NT 222.46501.6601 720 0023
SHERIFF PATROL 27,776.40 PROF SRV - LAW E FORCEME 101.42101.3050 DECEMBER 720 0023
30,536.91 *VENDOR TOTAL
WRIGHT HENNEPIN SECURITY
DEP REG 19.12 MAINTENANCE AGRE MENTS 101.41990.3190 MONITORING 720 0024
PARKS 15.98 MAINTENANCE AGRE MENTS 101.45201.3190 MON ITOR I NG 720 002~
WATER TOWER 21. 25 MAINTENANCE AGRE MENTS 601.49440.3190 MONITORING 720 0024
56.35 *VENDOR TOTAL
WRIGHT-HENNEPIN COOP ELE
STREETS LIGHiS-GILLARD 8.00 ELECTRIC 101.43160.3810 720 002:-
WSB & ASSOCIATES, INC.
GENERAL ENGINEERING 785.75 PROF SRV - ENGINE ERING F 101.41910.3030 01010.00-00017 720 002',
VECTOR TOOL 100.00 PROF SRV - ENGINE ERING F 101.41910.3030 01010.03-00001 720 002;
MONTICELLO SR HIGH 16.50 PROF SRV - ENGINE ERING F 101.41910.3030 01010.17-00014 720 002,
MONTICELLO MAPS 661.66 PROF SRV - ENG! E ERING F 101.41910.3030 01010.27-01009 720 002'
. WALNUT/ELM RR CROSSING 201.00 PROF SRV - ENGI E ERING F 101.41910.3030 01010.35-00008 720 002!
CARDINAL HILLS 6TH 16.50 PROF SRV - ENG! E ERING F 454.49201.3030 01010.50-00010 720 OOt
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF MONTICELL(
~2/'0198 '5,34,0, Schedul of Bills GL540R-V05.20 PAGE 1C
ENDOR NAME
DESCRI PTION AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE POll F/P 10 LINE
WSB & ASSOCIATES, INC.
COMP WATER RESOURCE 189.00 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 262.49201.3199 01010.53-00007 720 00286
E OAK MEADOWS PLAN REV 625.25 PROF SRV - ENGINE RING F 101.41910.3030 01010.57-00009 120 00258
RIVER MILL 2ND 161.75 PROF SRV - ENGINE RING F 101.41910.3030 01010.61-00006 720 00287
MONTE CLUB SEWER EXT 543.50 PROF SRV - ENGINE RING F 101.41910.3030 01010.62-00009 720 00259
;MONTE CLUB SEWER 197.50 PROF SRV - ENGINE RING F 101.41910.3030 ' 01010.62-00010 720 00288
MONTICELLO/BL HOSP 108.25 PROF SRV - ENGINE RING F 101.41910.3030 01010.63-00010 720 00249
MONTICELLO/BL HOSPITAL 45.25 PROF SRV - ENGINE RING F 101.41910.3030 01010.63-00011 720 00260
COMM CENTER 939.50 PROF SRV - ENGINE RING F 461.49201.3030 01010.66-00008 720 00289
RIVER MILL 4TH ADDT 90.50 PROF SRV - ENGINE RING F 101.41910.3030 01010.68-00007 120 00261
RIVER MILL 4TH 100.00 PROF SRV - ENGINE RING F 101.41910.3030 01010.68-00008 720 00290
KLEIN FARMS ESTATES 3RD 226.25 PROF SRV - ENGINE RING F 101.41910.3030 01010.69-00007 720 00262
ST HENRY'S 479.00 PROF SRV - ENGINE RING F 101.41910.3030 01010.12-00008 120 00263
ST HENRY'S 294.75 PROF SRV - ENGINEE ING F 101.41910.3030 01010.72-00009 720 00291
GOLD NUGGET DEV PLAN REV 181.00 PROF SRV - ENGINEE ING F 101.41910.3030 01010.13-00004 720 00251
GOLD NUGGET DEV 135.75 PROF SRV - ENGINEE ING F 101.41910.3030 01010.73-00005 720 00264
WILDWOOD RIDGE 2,112.75 PROF SRV - ENGINEE ING F 101.41910.3030 01010.75-00007 720 00265
WILDWOOD RIDGE 2,293.75 PROF SRV - ENGINEE ING F 101.41910.3030 01010.75-00008 120 00292
FIRE STATION DRIVEWAY 5,702.50 PROF SRV - ENGINEE ING F 101.41910.3030 01010.77-00001 720 00245
SW AREA SANITARY SEWER 835.00 PROF SRV - ENGINEE ING F 101.41910.3030 01010.79-00005 720 00266
FRONT PORCH DEV 45.25 PROF SRV - ENGINEE ING F 101.41910.3030 01010.80-00003 720 00252
.5T BENEDICT'S SR HOUSING 652.50 PROF SRV - ENGINEE ING F 101.41910.3030 01010.81-00001 720 00267
ST BENEDICT 1,084.00 PROF SRV - ENGINEE ING F 101.41910.3030 01010.81-00002 720 00293
. 'CR 118 486.75 PROF SRV - ENGINEE ING F 101.41910.3030 01010.82-00001 720 00306
CR 118 144.00 PROF SRV - ENGINEE ING F 101.41910.3030 01010.82-00002 720 00304
CR 118 675.75 PROF SRV - ENGINEE ING F 101.41910.3030 01010.82-00003 720 00303
MW GRAPHICS 345.75 PROF SRV - ENGINEE ING F 101.41910.3030 01010.82-00004 720 00311
RIVER FOREST 1,183.25 PROF SRV - ENGINEE ING F 101.41910.3030 01010.83-00003 720 00268
LYMAN 226.25 PROF SRV - ENGINEE ING F 101.41910.3030 01010.88-00002 720 00294
GOLD NUGGET EAW 4,371. 75 PROF SRV - ENGINEE ING F 101.41910.3030 01010.89-00001 720 00250
GOLD NUGGET EAW 452.50 PROF SRV - ENGINEE ING F 101.41910.3030 01010.89-00002 720 00269
PARKING LOT OVERLAYS 4,076.25 PROF SRV - ENGINEE ING F 101.41910.3030 01010.90-00001 720 00253
PARKING LOT OVERLAYS 2,807.75 PROF SRV - ENGINEE ING F 101.41910.3030 01010.90-00002 720 00270
PARKING LOT OVERLAYS 9.25 PROF SRV - ENGINEE ING F 101.41910.3030 01010.90-00003 720 00285
WALNUT AVE 1,014.50 PROF SRV - ENGINEERING F 101.41910.3030 01010.91-00001 120 00243
ST ELEV WALNUT TO 7TH 1.127.00 PROF SRV - ENGINEERING F 101.41910.3030 01010.91-00002 120 00271
STREET ELEVATIONS 1. 204 . 75 PROF SRV - ENGINEERING F 101.41910.3030 01010.91-00003 720 00295
LANTTO BLDG CO 808.99 PROF SRV - ENGINEER NG F 101.41910.3030 01010.92-00001 720 00274
7TH ST TRAFFIC STUDY 2,264.00 PROF SRV - ENGINEERNG F 101.41910.3030 01010.94-00001 720 00296
TH 25/CHELSEA ROAD 3,698.50 PROF SRV - ENGINEER NG F 450.49201.3030 01033.00-01046 720 00282
CHELSEA RD/SCHOOL BLVD 201.00 PROF SRV - ENGINEER NG F 101.41910.3030 01033.30-00008 720 00247
CHELSEA RD/SCHOOL BLVD 33.50 PROF SRV - ENGINEER NG F 101.41910.3030 01033.30-00009 720 00246
ENGINEERING SERVICES 995.50 PROF SRV - ENGINEER NG F 450.49201.3030 01033.40-00010 720 00283
7TH STREET 3,693.68 PROF SRV - ENGINEER NG F 462.49201.3030 01087.00-00010 720 00275
7TH STREET 2,750.55 PROF SRV - ENGINEER NG F 462.49201.3030 01087.00-00011 720 00297
7TH STREET 9,718.50 PROF SRV - ENGINEER NG F 462.49201.3030 01087.01-00001 720 00276
7TH STREET 13,122.62 PROF SRV - ENGINEER NG F 462.49201.3030 01087.01-00002 720 00298
~ SANITARY SEWER INTERCEPT 6,067.12 PROF SRV - ENGINEER NG F 461.49201.3030 01101.00-00004 720 00277
, . SAN IT ARY SEWER 2,447.94 PROF SRV - ENGINEER NG F 461.49201.3030 01101.00-00006 720 00299
eRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF MONTICELLO
12/10/98 15;34;06 Schedule f Bills GL540R-V05.20 PAGE 11
.NDOR NAME
DESCRI PTION AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE POll F/P ID LINE
WSB & ASSOCIATES, INC.
COMM CENTER 276.75 PROF SRV - ENGINEER NG F 461.49201.3030 01101.01-00001 720 00278
COMM CENTER SEWER 3,313.00 PROF SRV - ENGINEER NG F 461.49201.3030 01101.01-00002 720 00300
CHELSEA ROAD EXT 7,093.75 PROF SRV - ENGINEER NG F 101.41910.3030 01102.00-00002 720 00255
CSAH 75 3,933.50 PROF SRV - ENGINEER NG F 101.41910.3030 01109.00-00004 720 00281
CSAH 75 90.50 PROF SRV - ENGINEER NG F 101,41910.3030 01109.00-00005 720 00301
CR 118 5,482.00 PROF SRV - ENGINEER NG F 101.41910.3030 01125.00-00001 720 00302
SE BOOSTER STATION 4,155.75 PROF SRV - ENGINEER NG F 101.41910.3030 01129.00-00001 720 00254
SE BOOSTER STATION 1,200.50 PROF SRV - ENGINEER NG F 101.41910.3030 01129.00-00002 720 00279
CRl18 UTILITY IMPR 8,127.50 PROF SRV - ENGINEER NG F 101.41910.3030 01134.00-00001 720 00244
WALNUT ST N IMPR 4,307.00 PROF SRV - ENGINEER NG F 463.49201.3030 02014.20-00001 720 00248
120,732.06 *VENDOR TOTAL
.
.
8RC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
12/10/98 15:34:06
eENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
REPORT TOTALS:
.
.
AMOUNT
474,957.74
ACCOUNT NAME
RECORDS PRINTED - 000310
Schedule f 8ills
FUND & ACCOUNT
CITY OF MONTICELLO
GL540R-V05.20 PAGE 12
CLAIM INVOICE POI F/P ID LINE
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF MONTICELLO
12/10/98 15:34:11 Schedule of Bill s GL060S-V05.20 RECAPPAGE
. GL540R
FUND RECAP:
FUND DESCRIPTION 01 BURSEMENTS
----------------------------
101 GENERAL FUND 65,048.15
211 LIBRARY FUND 891.09
213 HRA FUND 32,559.60
222 SCERG (ECON RECOVERY GRANT) 2,760.51
223 CMIF (CENT MN INIT FUND) 1,100.21
224 SHADE TREE FUND 192.00
230 OAA FUND 1.680.76
240 CAPITAL PROJECT REVOLVING FD 98.11
262 SANITARY SEWER ACCESS FUND 189.00
436 93-14C WWTP EXPANSION PRJ 1,539.30
450 96-04C HWY25/MNDOT IMPR 4,694.00
453 97-07C HIGH SCHOOL TR ST SEW 21.071.28
454 97-01C CARD HILLS VI 16.50
461 98-03C COMMUNITY CENTER 07,928.07
462 98~12C 7TH STREET EXTENSION 29,285.35
463 BRIDGE PK/N WALNUT IMPR 4,307.00
601 WATER FUND 4.780.49
602 SEWER FUND 339.19
t MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND 91.182.36
TRANSPORTATION FUND 4.884.77
RIVERSIDE CEMETERY 410.00
TOTAL ALL FUNDS 74,957.74
BANK RECAP:
BANK NAME
DISBURSEMENTS
GENL GENERAL CHECKING
LIQR LIQUOR CHECKING
3 3,775.38
1,182.36
TOTAL ALL BANKS
4 4,957.74
THE PRECEDING LIST OF BILLS PAYABLE WAS R VIEWED AND APPROVED FOR PAYMENT.
DATE ............
APPROVED BY
.
-
.
.
.
COUNCIL UPDATE
Decembe 11,1998
(1.S.)
it to be 10 ated 'ust west of the C.R. 39 over ass of
According to the Wright County Planning and 20 ing office, the public comment period, which
is part of the environmental assessment workshee (EA W) process, for the proposed gravel pit
near Monticello will likely open Monday, Decem er 14, 1998.
The applicant for the sand and gravel extraction p oject is Otter Creek, LLC; and this is to be
located just west of the c.R. 39 overpass ofI-94 i Monticello Township.
The EA W process was started by the Monticello rderly Annexation Area (MOAA) Board in
September. The purpose of the EA W is to disclos information about potential environmental
impacts of the project. It is used to determine if a y environmental impact statement is needed
and how the project could be modified to lessen it environmental impacts.
The project also requires a conditional use permit
hold until the environmental review is completed.
require a public hearing, and new notices will be
om the MOAA Board. This process is on
he conditional use permit process will
ade prior to that.
The 30-day comment period for the EA W will begi when a notice is published in the State's
EQB Monitor publication, which is expected this onday. During the 30-day period, anyone
may submit written comments to the County at the nvironmental Health Office, Wright County
Government Center, 10 Second Street NW, Room 40, Buffalo, MN 55313-1185.
Comments should address the accuracy and comple eness of the EA W, potential impacts that
warrant further investigation before the project start, or reasons to justify the need for an
environmental impact statement.
After the 30-day public comment period ends, the OAA Board will have 30 days to make a
decision on the need for an environmental impact st tement. The decision must be based on
factual information from the EA W, comments recei ed and responses to those comments.
Copies of the EA Ware available for review in the panning and zoning office at the County's
governnlent center. If you have further questions ab ut the process, please call their office at
682-7338.
As takenfrom tlte Monticello Times, 12/10/98
KARENIOFFICEIAGENDASIGRAVPIT.UPD: 12/11/98
'41
.
.
COUNCIL U DATE
December 1 ,1998
(1.S.)
According to the Wright County Planning and Zoni g office, the public comment period, which
is part of the environmental assessment worksheet ( . A W) process, for the proposed gravel pit
near Monticello will likely open Monday, Decembe 14, 1998.
The applicant for the sand and gravel extraction pro eet is Otter Creek, LLC; and this is to be
located just west of the C.R. 39 overpass of! -94 in onticello Township.
The EA W process was started by the Monticello Or erly Annexation Area (MOAA) Board in
September. The purpose of the EA W is to disclose nformation about potential environmental
impacts of the project. It is used to determine if an environmental impact statement is needed
and how the project could be modified to lessen its nvironmental impacts.
The project also requires a conditional use permit fr m the MOAA Board. This process is on
hold until the environmental review is completed. he conditional use permit process will
require a public hearing, and new notices will be ill de prior to that.
The 3D-day comment period for the EA W will begi when a notice is published in the State's
EQB Monitor publication, which is expected this M nday. During the 3D-day period, anyone
may submit written comments to the County at the .. nvironmental Health Office, Wright County
Government Center, 10 Second Street NW, Room 1 0, Buffalo, MN 55313-1185.
Comments should address the accuracy and complet ness of the EA W, potential impacts that
warrant further investigation before the project start , or reasons to justify the need for an
environmental impact statement.
After the 30-day public comment period ends, the OAA Board will have 30 days to make a
decision on the need for an environmental impact st tement. The decision must be based on
factual information from the EA W, comments recei ed and responses to those comments.
Copies of the EA Ware available for review in the panning and zoning office at the County's
government center. If you have further questions ab ut the process, please call their office at
682-7338.
As taken/rom the Monticello Times. 12/10/98
KAREN\OFFICE'AGENDAS\GRAVPIT.UPD: 12/11/98