The URL can be used to link to this page

City Council Agenda Packet 06-25-2018AGENDA REGULAR MEETING — MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, June 25, 2018 — 6:30 p.m. Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING 5:45 p.m. (Academy Room) 5:45 p.m. 2019 Budget Preview Mayor: Brian Stumpf Council Members: Jim Davidson, Bill Fair, Charlotte Gabler, Lloyd Hilgart 1. General Business A. Call to Order & Pledge of Allegiance B. Approval of Agenda — Councilmembers or the City Administrator may add items to the agenda for discussion purposes or approval. The City Council may or may not take official action on items added to the agenda. C. Approval of Meeting Minutes • Regular Meeting Minutes from June 11, 2018 D. Citizen Comments — Individuals may address the City Council about any item not contained on the agenda. Each speaker will be allotted three minutes with a maximum of five speakers. The Mayor may allow for additional time and/or speakers. The City Council generally takes no official action of items discussed, with the exception of referral to staff for future report. E. Public Service Announcements/Updates • 4th of July Business Hours • Riverfest • Music on the Mississippi • Construction Update F. Council Liaison Updates • Library Board • EDA G. Department Updates • City Administrator Update 2. Consent Agenda — All items listed on the Consent Agenda are considered standard or may not need discussion prior to approval. These items are acted upon by one motion unless a councilmember, the city administrator, or a citizen requests the item by removed from consent for additional discussion. A. Consideration of approving payment of bills B. Consideration of approving new hires and departures for City departments C. Consideration of approving the sale/disposal of surplus city property D. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2018-48 accepting donations from Corey and Rachel Peters of $400 for mirrors at the Prairie Center Building and from Donna Dunkerson of $352.20 for flowers for East Bridge Park gardens E. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2018-49 establishing an Absentee Ballot Board for the 2018 Elections F. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2018-50 appointing election judges to serve for the 2018 Primary Election, including judges for the Absentee Ballot Board and Health Care Facility Voting G. Consideration of approving a Special Event Permit allowing use of Ellison Park and related assistance in conjunction with Art in the Park/Taste of Monticello on Saturday, July 14, 2018. Applicant: Monticello Chamber of Commerce H. Consideration of approving a Special Event Permit allowing use West Bridge Park and related assistance for the Party in the Park on July 11, 2018. Applicant: Monticello Chamber of Commerce I. Consideration of approving an application for temporary on -sale liquor license for the VFW for Monticello Chamber of Commerce Party in the Park on July 11, 2018 J. Consideration of approving a lease agreement with Wright County for election equipment K. Consideration of adopting Ordinance 698 amending Title 3, Chapter 20 (Mobile Food Units), Section 4 (D) of the Monticello City Code to change the time period of the annual license to a full calendar year L. Consideration of approving a Special Event Permit for outdoor entertainment at Chatter's Bar & Grill on July 13 and 14, 2018. Applicant: Steffens, Brooke/Chatters Restaurant M. Consideration of approving request for Amendment to Monticello Zoning Ordinance Chapter 5.4 — Temporary Uses, Chapter 4.1 — Landscaping and Screening, Chapter 4.4 — Exterior Lighting, and Chapter 5.3 — Accessory Use Standards. Applicant: City of Monticello N. Consideration of adopting Ordinance No. 700 amending Monticello Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 3, Section 7, for the Floodplain District, and adopt Ordinance 700A, a summary ordinance for amendment to the Monticello Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 3, Section 7 for the Floodplain District O. Consideration of approving a Development Stage Planned Unit Development for a 47 -unit, 4 story apartment complex in the CCD (Central Community District). Applicant: Pat Briggs/Briggs Companies P. Consideration of approving a preliminary and final plat and development contract for Oakwood Yd Addition, a two lot subdivision in the I-2 (Heavy Industrial) District. Applicant: Platinum Technologies Q. Consideration of approving a request on an extension of final plat approval for Spaeth Industrial Park R. Consideration of authorizing the preparation of an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for the proposed Haven Ridge Development S. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2018-51 authorizing execution and filing of petition to reopen proceedings related to the transfer of portions of Wright County Ditch 33 to the City of Monticello T. Consideration of approving the purchase of shimmer wall artwork to be located at 112 Broadway East from Radiant Manufacturing for $12,418 U. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2018-56 regarding Minnesota Investment Fund (MIF) 80-20 Opt Out program V. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2018-55 approving Decertification of Redevelopment TIF District #1-35 W. Consideration of authorizing the purchase of influent pumps for the WWTP from Nelson Electric Motor for $45,558 2A. Consideration of items removed from the consent agenda for discussion 3. Public Hearings A. PUBLIC HEARING — Consideration of adopting Resolution 2018-54 establishing Affordable Housing TIF District #1-40 4. Regular Agenda A. Consideration of approving a request for a PUD (Planned Unit Development) Adiustment in the Amax Addition. Applicant: StoraaeLink of Monticello, LLC 5. Added Items 6. Adjournment AGENDA CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, June 25, 2018 — 5:45 p.m. Academy Room, MCC AGENDA 1. Call to Order 2. 5:45 p.m. 2019 Budget Preview 3. Adjournment 2019 Budget Workshop Start June 25, 2018 Presentation Outline Important Dates What's New Levy Information Budget — Key Items and Starting Point )�, Comments and Questions 2 Important Dates September 10 (preliminary levy) Middle November (TNT notices) December 10 (final levy) K Schedule Date Activity 2019-2023 capital equipment/projects (Cl P) worksheets and budget June 8, 2018 worksheets to department heads. July 2, 2018 2019-2023 CIP and budget worksheets due to finance department July 9, 2018 Workshop with city council and staff to set 2019 goals and priorities. July, 2018 Department heads meet with various advisory boards and commissions for input into 2019 preliminary budget and Cl P. Department heads meet with city administrator, and finance staff to develop July, 2018 2019 preliminary budget and CI P. July 23, 2018 Workshop with city council to review draft department budgets and set 2019 goals and priorities. Finance department develops revenue estimates and 2019 preliminary August 13, 2018 property tax levy. Council workshop to review various department goals, budgets, and CI P August 27, 2018 continued. September 10, 2018 Budget workshop with city council and staff. Council adopts 2019 preliminary HRA and city property tax levy. (See September Z0, 2018 September 24) September 24, 2018 Last regular meeting for city council to consider adopting the 2019 preliminary city property tax levy. September 30, 2018 2019 preliminary property tax levy certified to Wright County auditor. October/November, 2018 Department heads meet with city administrator and finance staff to develop 2019 proposed budget and final property tax levy. December 10, 2018 Council adopts 2019 budget and property tax levy. December 28, 2018 City certifies final 2019 property tax levy to Wright County auditor and files Form TNT with the MN Department of Revenue. January 1, 2019 2019 fiscal year begins. What's (or not so) New �� Add 2nd '/2 half year for law enforcement and fire position. Non -election (even years) — subtract $16k 2019. Insurance increases: WC = 4-8%; Auto = 0%; Property = 2-4%; Liability = 2-6%. 5 Tax Levy Information $10 $9 $8 $7 0 $6 $5 $4 $3 $2 $1 Property Tax Levy Summary �OOV �0OS �00 6' �Dk "bo SOD �D� �D> �Oy �O� �D� �O� �O� o o o V s �O� s 8 �O� Tax Capacity Values and Rates $35 $30 $25 $20 •v o M — v$15 X ~ $10 $5 Tax Capacity Values and Tax Capacity Rates 62.421 OQ 4M $11.17 70.0 60.0 50.0 R GG - 40.0 >- 6 30.0 U X ca 20.0 ~ 10.0 $- 0.0 ��s X010 Tax Capacity Value -40—Tax Capacity Rate 7 Tax Rate Comparison City of South Haven City of Cokato City of Waverly City of Clearwater City of Howard.. City of Maple Lake City of Annandale City of Buffalo City of Montrose City of Dayton City of Delano City of Rockford City of Albertville City of Hanover City of St. Michael City of Otsego City of Monticello City Tax Rates - 2018 0.0 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0 100.0 120.0 140.0 C17 Tax Levy Comparison Property Tax Levy - 2018 MONTICELLO BUFFALO ST MICHAEL OTSEGO ALBERTVILLE DELANO ROCKFORD HANOVER ANNANDALE COKATO MAPLE LAKE MONTROSE �=111 CLEARWATER WAVERLY HOWARD LAKE SOUTH HAVEN $- $1 $2 $3 $4 $5 $6 $7 $8 $9 $10 Millions 9 MONTICELLO BUFFALO ST MICHAEL OTSEGO ALBERTVILLE DELANO ROCKFORD CO KAT O ANNANDALE Property Tax & LGA Property Tax Levy & LGA - 2018 MONTROSE HANOVER MAPLE LAKE HOWARD LAKE CLEARWATER WAVERLY SOUTH HAVEN $- $1 $2 $3 $4 $5 $6 $7 $8 $9 $10 Millions irt Tax Rates Tax Capacity Rates by Taxing Authority 70 140 11 w so JOA 120 00 I- 0 ♦ � 50 100 a LL, 40 so t County o Ck. f City a 30 60 i Other T H f School C 20 40 0 --Total X �a H 10 20 0 — 0 OC` Oh OHO 01 04' O°1 ,yO ,y'y ,y'L y� ,yon yh y� y1 ,yw 11 Tax Levy % by Authority Property Tax Breakdown - 2018 School 17.6% City 7.6% 12 Tax Levy Information Property Tax Differential - City and County $2,500,000 � Es $1,500,000 $1,000,000 $ 500,000 $ w $(500,000) 13 Tax Levy — CPI Property Tax Levy % vs Consumer Price Index 20.0% 15.0% 10.0% 5.0% 0.0% 2004 2005 16 -5.0% H ri M 2008 2009 2MO 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 14 Tax Levy — CPI Property Tax Levy vs. CPI (2004-2018) $12- $8 12 $8 $6 $4 $2 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Actual Levy CPI Levy 15 Levy Breakdown History Fund General Fund MCC - Operating Debt Service HRA Total 2014 2015 2016 Property Property Property Taxes Taxes Taxes $5,497,000 $5,882,000 $6,177, 000 350,000 358,000 364,000 2,303,000 2,295, 000 2,384,000 - - 280,000 $8,150,000 $8,535,000 $9,205,000 2017 2018 Property Property % $$ Taxes Taxes Change Change $6,291,000 $6,590,000 4.8% $299,000 372,000 387,000 4.0% 15,000 2,487, 000 2,570,000 3.3% 83,000 280,000 323,000 15.4% 43,000 $9,430,000 $9,870,000 4.7% 440,000 Budgeting and Finance Property Tax Levy (Adopted - 2018) Debt Service, 2,570,000 f 2601r, HRA Levy, $323,000 , 3% MCC Operations, 387,000,4% General Fund, $6,590,000 , 67% 17 Levy Breakdown History Levy Breakdown by Purpose $0 2014 2015 2016 2017 ■ General Fund ■ Debt Service ■ MCC ■ HRA 2018 000 Key Items )�, Dependence on Property Taxes 19 Property Tax Dependence General Fund Revenues - 2018 ;. Property Taxes ■ Franchise & Other Taxes ■ Licenses & Permits ■ Intergovernmental Revenues Charges for Services ■ All Other Property Taxes, 80% c $9 $8 III $6 c 5 0 $4 $3 $2 $1 General Fund General Fund Revenues 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Property Taxes Licenses & Permits All Other 21 $900 $800 $700 IA $600 V $500 $400 $300 $200 $100 General Fund Building Permits (2007 - 2017) 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 22 Tax Base Changes Values on at 1/1/2018 taxable for 2019. ➢New building permits $13.4M Increase in residential valuation 6.8%. 23 Key Items Dependence on Property Taxes Personnel Services 24 Personnel Services Fund Step Wage 3% Health 3% Total Tax Supported General Fund $ 26,000 $ 73,000 $ 13,000 $ 112,000 MCC Fund 16,000 15,000 2,000 33,000 Self Sustaining - I EDA 3,000 3,000 1,000 7,000 Liquor 4,000 10,000 3,000 17,000 Sewaqe 6,000 8,000 2,000 16,000 Water 6,000 8,000 2,000 16,000 DMV 4,000 6,000 2,000 12,000 Total All $ 65,000 $ 123,000 $ 25,000 $ 213,000 25 General Fund )�, Police contract inflation '/2 year 4 hours - $52k; - $48k (3.5%); add together $1 00k )�, Full-time fire position: add �/2 year$45k )�, Wage and benefit inflation: $112k $257k 26 Key Items Dependence on Property Taxes Personnel Services Capital Assets and New Debt Needs 27 Capital Priority Classification i. Imperative (Must -Do) ii. Essential (Should -Do) iii. Important (Could -Do) : Priority 1: Imperative (Must -Do) t. Corrects a condition dangerous to public health or safety 2. Satisfies a legal obligation (law, regulation, court order, contract) s. Alleviates an emergency service disruption or deficiency 4. Prevents irreparable damage to a valuable public facility 29 Priority 2: Essential (Should -Do) t. Rehabilitates or replaces an obsolete public facility or attachment thereto 2. Stimulates economic growth and private capital investment s. Reduces future operating and maintenance 4. Leverages available state or federal funding 30 Priority 3: Important (Could -Do) 1. Provides a new or expanded level of service 2. Promotes intergovernmental cooperation s. Reduces energy consumption 4. Enhances cultural or natural resources 31 Central Equipment Fund Purchases Amount Mowers, Etc. (5) $ 2147632 Vehicles (6) 2747048 Tractors (2) 1531864 Sweeper 2307432 Fire Tender 3327966 Asphalt Heater 797110 Excavator 647523 Rubber Melter 53,314 Compactor 341500 Chipper 277728 Bobcat 587055 Aerator 292950 Sprayer, compressor, tank, miller, cutter 767767 $ 11 629, 889 27 over 5 years 32 $3,000,000 $2,500,000 $2,000,000 $1,500,000 $1,000,000 $500,000 Debt Service Levy Debt Service Levy (2013 - 2027) 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 ■ 2010A Imp 2011A Imp ■ 2007A Imp. 2008 Sewer 2008A MCC ■ 2014A AE 20156 SR&I 2016A SR&I ■ 2017A Fallon ■ 2018 Projects W $30 $25 Debt Level (Non -EF) G.O. Debt Outstanding (2013 - 2027) 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 ■ 2010A Imp. ■ 2011A Imp. ■ 2007A Imp. ■ 2008 Sewer ■ 2008A MCC ■ 2013 C01 ■ 2014A AE 20156 SR&I ■ 2016A SR&I ■ 2017A SR&I ■ 2018A SR&I ■ 2019A SR&I .A Midwest CPI — 12 Months May 2. 3 % 35 Financial Management �. Recurring expenditures should be offset by recurring revenues. 2. Conservatively estimate revenues and liberally estimate expenditures. 3. Always spend your most restrictive money first. Stewardship Defined: �� Stewardship is an ethic that embodies the responsible planning and management of resources. Observations Sustainability Incrementalism )�, Diversification Questions or Comments? 1-i LM; REGULAR MEETING — MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, June 11, 2018 — 6:30 p.m. Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center Present: Mayor Brian Stumpf, Jim Davidson, Bill Fair, Charlotte Gabler, and Lloyd Hilgart Absent: None 1. General Business A. Call to Order & Pledge of AlleLiance Mayor Stumpf called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. B. Approval of Auenda Councilmember Fair moved approval of the agenda. Councilmember Hilgart seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. C. Regular Meeting Minutes from meeting on Mav 29.2018 Councilmember Gabler moved approval of the May 29, 2018 City Council minutes. Councilmember Hilgart seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. D. Citizen Comments None. E. Public Service Annn uncements None. F. Co ancil Liaison Updates • Planning Commission — Councilmember Gabler provided an update on the following: 1) public hearing on Briggs Multi -Family Development State PUD; 2) home addition variance; 3) Yakymi CUP amendment; 4) Oakwood 3rd Addition; and 5) ordinance amendments. • Mayor Stumpf noted that there was a joint meeting of EDA and City Council to discuss the Walnut Street Corridor which included a walking tour. Mayor Stumpf commented on the groundbreaking ceremony for the Fallon Avenue Overpass on June 4. G. Department Updates • City Administrator Update — Jeff O'Neill gave an update on the following: 1. Xcel Energy is holding a stakeholder meeting on June 26 at 1 p.m. in St. Paul regarding resource plan. 2. Thanked all of the people/groups that contributed to making Walk `n' Roll a successful event. 3. Wright County is hosting an open house on June 20 on their long range transportation plan. City Council Minutes —June 11, 2018 Page 1 1 4 Rachel Leonard, Communications & Special Projects Coordinator, provided an update on the current and future role of communications throughout the city. Sue Seeger, Arts Consultant, provided an update on the Monticello Arts Initiative and commented on current and future community art projects. 2. Consent Agenda: Councilmember Fair moved approval of the consent agenda with the exception of item J. Councilmember Davidson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. A. Consideration of approving the payment of bills. Recommendation: Approved bill and purchase card registers for a total amount of $712,044.90. B. Consideration of approving new hires/departures. Recommendation: Approved hires for Parks, MCC, Liquor Store, Streets, and Water and departures for Liquor Store and MCC. C. Consideration of approving the sale/disposal of surplus city property. Recommendation: No report this cycle. D. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2018-45 accepting donations from CentraCare Monticello of $500 for Music on the Mississippi, $564.50 from Cargill for flowers for the median along Broadway, and $1,500 from United Way and $190 from Crow River Food Council/Local Roots Food Coop for the Farmers Market Power of Produce program. Recommendation: Adopted Resolution 2018-45 accepting the donations as listed. E. Consideration of approving a transient merchant/traveling show permit for Gopher State Expositions to take place at Quarry Community Church on June 14-17, 2018. Recommendation: Approved the transient merchant permit for a traveling show at the Quarry Church property on June 14-17, 2018. F. Consideration of approving a Special Event Permit allowing use of Yd Street parking lot, closure of Walnut Street and related assistance in conjunction with the Rotary "Taste of the Towns" event on September 13, 2018. Applicant: Monticello Rotary Club. Recommendation: Approved the event permit for Rotary Taste of the Towns. G. Consideration of approving an application for one -day temporary on -sale liquor license for Monticello Rotary Club for "Taste of the Towns" event on September 13, 2018. Recommendation: Approved the temporary liquor license for Rotary Taste of the Towns. H. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2018-46 to Advance Municipal State Aid funds for the Fallon Avenue Overpass Project, City Project 16CO06 and the Chelsea Road Improvement Project, City Project 17C001. Recommendation: Adopted Resolution 2018-46 to advance municipal state aid. I. Consideration of approving a request for Conditional Use Permit for an approximately 480 square foot residential detached Accessory Use Structure — City Council Minutes—June 11, 2018 Page 2 14 Major in an R-1 (Single -Family Residence) District. Applicant: Joe Yakymi. Recommendation: Approved the Conditional Use Permit subject to conditions listed in Exhibit Z. J. Consideration of authorizing creation of a Feasibility Study for installation of a splash pad at Pioneer Park. Recommendation: ITEM WAS REMOVED FROM THE AGENDA. K. Consideration of acknowledging receipt of a petition for annexation from Ronald Denn, General Partner, Denn Family Properties, LP and Ronald and Lisa Denn and to proceed to verification of compliance with the Joint Resolution for Orderly Annexation. Recommendation: Acknowledge receipt of petition for annexation to approved proceeding with verification of compliance with Joint Resolution for Orderly Annexation. 2A. Items removed from Consent Atienda: J. Consideration of authorizing creation of a Feasibility Study for installation of a splash pad at Pioneer Park. Councilmember Hilgart removed the item with questions regarding the project as a whole and other factors that need to be addressed such as parking, bathrooms, etc. Matt Leonard, City Engineer, responded that those questions relate to the need for the study and to look at the project as a whole to evaluate how this will work for the city and all the items that will be needed. Once completed staff will be able to provide more information to the City Council on the specifics of the project. There was a question from Councilmember Fair in regard to the site of the splash pad and whether or not the study would open up to other locations. Matt Leonard noted that the study will be looking at the two preferred locations at Pioneer Park. There was additional discussion among councilmembers and staff regarding partnership with the Lions, timeframe of project, total costs, and other items. WSB is recommended to complete the study. Mayor Stumpf expressed concern about the staff time being spent on the study and why staff didn't complete an RFP for the feasibility study. Councilmember Fair moved approval of a feasibility study for the installation of a splash pad at Pioneer Park to be completed by WSB for a total hourly fee not to exceed $10,690. Councilmember Hilgart seconded the motion. Motion carried 4-1; Mayor Stumpf voted against for reason listed above. 3. Public Hearing: A. PUBLIC HEARING — Consideration of adopting Resolution 2018-47 ordering improvements, accepting plans and specifications, and authorizing advertisement for bids for the 2018 Pedestrian Improvement Project, Citv Project 18C001. Shibani Bisson, WSB/Engineer, gave a brief presentation on the project. There are four proposed 6 -foot wide sidewalk extensions as part of the project: south side of 6th St. between Walnut St. and TH 25; south side of 7th St. between Cedar St. and City Council Minutes—June 11, 2018 Page 3 1 4 the post office; north side of Oakwood Dr. between TH 25 and Cedar St.; and south side of Bakken St. between Garvey Ct. to the Rolling Woods Park. There is also a proposed 10 -foot wide trail extension along CSAH 39 between Mississippi Drive and Broadway St. The total project cost is $278,485 with $52,388 being assessed. Construction is planned to begin in August with final completion in September. Mayor Stumpf opened the public hearing. The following individual testified: Mary Bergland, representative from McGuire Equity LLC, had questions about the finished product such as whether or not there will be a boulevard and if the driveway will be replaced with the same material and if trees will be replace. Shibani Bisson address Ms. Bergland's questions and noted that, yes, the driveway material and trees will be replaced. Mayor Stumpf closed the public hearing. Minimal discussion occurred. Councilmember Hilgart moved approval of Resolution 2018-47 ordering improvements, accepting plans and specifications and authorizing advertisement for bids for the 2018 pedestrian improvement project, City Project 18C001. Councilmember Gabler seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. 4. Adiournment By consensus, the meeting was adjourned at 7:44 p.m. Recorder: Jennifer Schreiber Approved: Attest: City Administrator City Council Minutes —June 11, 2018 Page 4 1 4 City Council Agenda: 6/25/2018 2A. Consideration of avvrovin2 vavment of bills (WO) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: City staff submits the attached bill registers and purchasing card registers for approval by Council. The bill registers contain all invoices processed and the purchasing card registers contain all card purchases made since the last Council meeting. Subject to MN Statutes, most invoices require Council approval prior to releasing checks for payment. The day following Council approval, payments will be released unless directed otherwise. A credit purchasing agreement and policy was approved by Council initially and card purchases must comply with the policy. If Council has no questions or comments on the bill and purchase card registers, these can be approved with the consent agenda. If requested, this item can be removed from consent and discussed prior to making a motion for approval. Al. Budget Impact: None A2. Staff Workload Impact: No additional work required. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the bill and purchase card registers for a total amount of $1,000,928.66. 2. Motion to approve the registers with changes directed by Council. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends Alternative #1 or #2, per direction of Council. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • Bill registers and Purchase Card registers Accounts Payable Computer Check Proof List by Vendor User: Debbie.Davidson Printed: 06/20/2018 - 3:36PM Batch: 00203.06.2018 - 203.06.2018 AP Invoice No Description Vendor: 4987 AAA MOVERS INC 6/18/2018 TIF 1-22 Moving Expenses - James Quentin You Check Total: Vendor: 1018 ALLIED BLACKTOP COMPANY 1924 (201.20) gal. Road Oil @ $3.45 Check Total: Vendor: 1021 AME RED E MIX INC 117887 ZPARKS-FSTONE- (1.50) CY 3.5K Ash NA Check Total: Vendor: 1036 APEC AQUISITIONS INC 122425 Filters - Various Sizes (16) Check Total: Vendor: 1039 AQUA LOGIC INC 47683 Jaco 5/8 x 1/2" MNPT - PP Adpt (4) Check Total: Vendor: 3491 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3266861 06/26/2018 resale - beer 3268929 resale - beer Check Total: Vendor: 4502 ARVIG 6/8/2018 IT Services - May 2018 Amount Payment Date Acct Number Check Sequence: 1 4,411.86 06/26/2018 213-46522-443990 4,411.86 Check Sequence: 2 694.14 06/26/2018 101-43120-422400 694.14 Check Sequence: 3 215.82 06/26/2018 229-45202-453010 215.82 Check Sequence: 4 341.27 06/26/2018 226-45126-422990 341.27 Check Sequence: 5 39.96 06/26/2018 226-45126-422990 39.96 Check Sequence: 6 64.00 06/26/2018 609-49750-425200 41.25 06/26/2018 609-49750-425200 105.25 Check Sequence: 7 133.00 06/26/2018 702-00000-431990 Moiiii6effo Y Reference ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: True AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/20/2018 - 3:36 PM) Page 1 Invoice No Description Check Total: Vendor: 1075 BOND TRUST SERVICES CORPORATION 42748 Agent Service GO Refunding Bonds, Series 201 Check Total: Vendor: 1080 BRAEMAR MAILING SERVICE INC 59026 UB June 2018 Inv - (3,745) Print, Fold, Stuff, Er 59026 UB June 2018 Inv - (3,745) Print, Fold, Stuff, Er Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 133.00 Check Total: Vendor: 4046 AST SPORTS INC 2136 ACH Enabled: True Staff Shirt - ML 2136 101-43115-421110 Staff Shirts (4 - RM) 113.95 06/26/2018 Check Total: Vendor: 1065 BELLBOY CORPORATION 64479300 freight 64479300 Check Sequence: 9 resale - liquor 64479300 06/26/2018 resale - wine 64576300 817.50 freight 64576300 resale - liquor 06/26/2018 609-49750-425300 Check Total: Vendor: 4992 BENTON ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP INC 6/13/2018 956.41 Lodging for 2018 EDA Conference 609-49750-425100 Check Total: Vendor: 1067 BERNICK'S 19827 resale - Events - pop 81344 250.00 resale - pop, water, Gatorade, 81345 resale -juice 81345 resale - soda 81346 resale - beer 84563 196.00 resale - pop, water, 84564 resale - soda pop 84564 226-45125-425410 resale -juice 84565 06/26/2018 resale - beer Check Total: Vendor: 1075 BOND TRUST SERVICES CORPORATION 42748 Agent Service GO Refunding Bonds, Series 201 Check Total: Vendor: 1080 BRAEMAR MAILING SERVICE INC 59026 UB June 2018 Inv - (3,745) Print, Fold, Stuff, Er 59026 UB June 2018 Inv - (3,745) Print, Fold, Stuff, Er Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 133.00 Check Sequence: 8 ACH Enabled: True 37.95 06/26/2018 101-43115-421110 113.95 06/26/2018 101-43111-421110 151.90 Check Sequence: 9 ACH Enabled: True 19.80 06/26/2018 609-49750-433300 817.50 06/26/2018 609-49750-425100 328.00 06/26/2018 609-49750-425300 16.13 06/26/2018 609-49750-433300 956.41 06/26/2018 609-49750-425100 2,137.84 Check Sequence: 10 ACH Enabled: False 250.00 06/26/2018 213-46301-433100 250.00 Check Sequence: 11 ACH Enabled: False 196.00 06/26/2018 226-45123-421460 549.85 06/26/2018 226-45125-425410 65.60 06/26/2018 609-49750-425500 68.75 06/26/2018 609-49750-425400 3,011.45 06/26/2018 609-49750-425200 196.10 06/26/2018 226-45125-425410 60.56 06/26/2018 609-49750-425400 32.80 06/26/2018 609-49750-425500 888.95 06/26/2018 609-49750-425200 5,070.06 Check Sequence: 12 ACH Enabled: True 475.00 06/26/2018 312-47000-462010 475.00 Check Sequence: 13 ACH Enabled: False 549.34 06/26/2018 601-49440-431800 549.33 06/26/2018 602-49490-431800 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/20/2018 - 3:36 PM) Page 2 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 59026 Inserts - Banner Contest for UB Billing (3745) 432.45 06/26/2018 101-41940-443990 59026 Inserts for UB Billing (3745) 37.45 06/26/2018 226-45122-434990 Check Total: 1,568.57 Vendor: 3632 BRIAN BRAMLEY Check Sequence: 14 ACH Enabled: True 11196 dba-Emerg. Response Soutions —name patch; (7 70.96 06/26/2018 101-42200-421990 11212 dba-Emerg. Response Sol.- (8) 3' letters; name p 125.61 06/26/2018 101-42200-421990 11212 dba-Emerg. Response Sol. -labor cleaning of geaj 22.42 06/26/2018 101-42200-421990 Check Total: 218.99 Vendor: 4328 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN WINE & SPIF Check Sequence: 15 ACH Enabled: False 1080812290 resale - wine 236.00 06/26/2018 609-49750-425300 1080812290 resale - liquor 2,585.67 06/26/2018 609-49750-425100 1080812290 freight 43.73 06/26/2018 609-49750-433300 1080812291 resale - wine 56.00 06/26/2018 609-49750-425300 1080812291 resale - beer 130.50 06/26/2018 609-49750-425200 1080815568 resale - wine 516.00 06/26/2018 609-49750-425300 1080815568 resale - liquor 2,558.65 06/26/2018 609-49750-425100 1080815568 freight 45.38 06/26/2018 609-49750-433300 1080815569 resale - beer 156.60 06/26/2018 609-49750-425200 Check Total: 6,328.53 Vendor: 4978 BRUNTON ARCHITECTS & ENGINEERS Check Sequence: 16 ACH Enabled: False 1 18C003 - Fire Station Schematic Design 24,398.97 06/26/2018 400-43300-452010 Check Total: 24,398.97 Vendor: 1086 BURNHAM COMPANIES LLC Check Sequence: 17 ACH Enabled: True 5251 (90) yds gold mulch delivered 6/6/18 2,050.00 06/26/2018 101-45201-422500 Check Total: 2,050.00 Vendor: 1091 CAMPBELL KNUTSON PA Check Sequence: 18 ACH Enabled: True 2348-000G 190 Planning & Zoning - May 2018 496.00 06/26/2018 101-41910-435100 2348-000G 190 Buliding -May 2018 48.00 06/26/2018 101-42400-430400 2348-000G 190 201742 - Clear Creek - May 2018 128.00 06/26/2018 101-41910-430400 2348-000G 190 16C006 - Fallon Overpass - May 2018 168.00 06/26/2018 400-43300-459018 2348-000G 190 General Legal - May 2018 1,410.18 06/26/2018 101-41610-430400 2348-148G 10 16C006 - Fallon Ave Condemnation - May 2018 1,968.00 06/26/2018 400-43300-459018 2348-152G 4 16D001 - Clear Creek Second Addition - May 2( 150.00 06/26/2018 101-00000-220110 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/20/2018 - 3:36 PM) Page 3 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/20/2018 - 3:36 PM) Page 4 Check Total: 4,368.18 Vendor: 4646 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES L.P. Check Sequence: 19 ACH Enabled: True 2112924 resale - beer 10,866.00 06/26/2018 609-49750-425200 2112924 resale - n/a 176.90 06/26/2018 609-49750-425400 2115775 resale - beer 13,193.90 06/26/2018 609-49750-425200 2115775 resale - n/a 212.00 06/26/2018 609-49750-425400 2119136 resale - beer 9,055.35 06/26/2018 609-49750-425200 2119136 resale - beer n/a 58.70 06/26/2018 609-49750-425400 2119136 resale - wine 138.00 06/26/2018 609-49750-425300 643-0311 resale - credit beer -1,556.20 06/26/2018 609-49750-425200 643-0316 resale - credit beer -23.15 06/26/2018 609-49750-425200 643-0325 resale - beer credit -226.80 06/26/2018 609-49750-425200 Check Total: 31,894.70 Vendor: 4089 CARLSON & LYTER DISTRIBUTING, INC Check Sequence: 20 ACH Enabled: True 617-0086 resale - beer 231.80 06/26/2018 609-49750-425200 Check Total: 231.80 Vendor: 1106 CENTRAL MCGOWAN INC Check Sequence: 21 ACH Enabled: True 00207245 Bulk Carbon Dioxide (629 lbs) 152.80 06/26/2018 226-45124-421600 Check Total: 152.80 Vendor: 4315 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS Check Sequence: 22 ACH Enabled: False 6/1/2018 Digital Receiver 7.96 06/26/2018 101-41110-431990 Check Total: 7.96 Vendor: 3750 MARK CHRISTIANSEN Check Sequence: 23 ACH Enabled: False 6/15/2018 Farmers Market Token Collection Log - 5/31/18 17.00 06/26/2018 226-45127-431992 Check Total: 17.00 Vendor: 4961 CINTAS CORP Check Sequence: 24 ACH Enabled: True 4006305795 Mats 19.60 06/26/2018 101-45501-431990 4006305815 Uniforms, Mops, Towels 44.01 06/26/2018 226-45126-431990 4006500639 Uniforms, Mops, Towels 44.01 06/26/2018 226-45126-431990 4006500676 mat service 64.02 06/26/2018 609-49754-431990 4006704041 Uniforms, Mops, Towels 47.70 06/26/2018 226-45126-431990 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/20/2018 - 3:36 PM) Page 4 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/20/2018 - 3:36 PM) Page 5 Check Total: 219.34 Vendor: 4563 ROBERT COPELAND Check Sequence: 25 ACH Enabled: True 2017/2018 boots boot reimbursement BC 89.99 06/26/2018 602-49490-420650 Check Total: 89.99 Vendor: 1129 DAHLHEIMER BEVERAGE LLC Check Sequence: 26 ACH Enabled: True 1347740 resale - beer 1,328.00 06/26/2018 609-49750-425200 1347752 resale - beer 1,212.90 06/26/2018 609-49750-425200 175654 resale - beer 98.00 06/26/2018 609-49750-425200 177967 resale - beer 10,446.65 06/26/2018 609-49750-425200 177967 resale - n/a 52.50 06/26/2018 609-49750-425400 178336 resale - beer 22,453.25 06/26/2018 609-49750-425200 178336 resale - n/a 26.05 06/26/2018 609-49750-425400 178748 resale - beer 1,549.25 06/26/2018 609-49750-425200 178911 resale - credit beer -210.00 06/26/2018 609-49750-425200 179072 resale - beer 128.00 06/26/2018 609-49750-425200 179185 resale - beer 28,219.04 06/26/2018 609-49750-425200 179185 resale - beer n/a 210.50 06/26/2018 609-49750-425400 180120 resale - beer 116.00 06/26/2018 609-49750-425200 Check Total: 65,630.14 Vendor: 2050 DEMVI LLC Check Sequence: 27 ACH Enabled: False 6/11/2018 July Parking Lot Easement Maintenance Agreerr. 121.60 06/26/2018 213-46301-443990 Check Total: 121.60 Vendor: 2284 EAGLE FOUNDRY OF UTAH INC Check Sequence: 28 ACH Enabled: False 94839 memorial plaque to be invoiced to family- Elliso 115.00 06/26/2018 101-45201-421650 Check Total: 115.00 Vendor: 1153 ECM PUBLISHERS INC Check Sequence: 29 ACH Enabled: True 606139 18C001 - Pedestrian Improvement PH Ad #820: 296.90 06/26/2018 400-43300-459013 608063 TIF Districst 1-40 Ad #816703 129.22 06/26/2018 213-46301-434990 Check Total: 426.12 Vendor: 4191 ELK RIVER GREENHOUSE LLC Check Sequence: 30 ACH Enabled: True 6/15/2018 Famers Market Token Collection Log - 5/17, 6/7 94.00 06/26/2018 226-45127-431992 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/20/2018 - 3:36 PM) Page 5 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number 94.00 9,515.00 9,515.00 100.00 100.00 635.59 497.56 19.48 264.92 344.06 203.69 268.06 113.88 14.22 69.78 64.31 124.95 10.00 10.00 41.95 41.95 41.95 29.95 69.95 41.95 87.88 12.95 329.81 500.00 250.00 185.00 200.00 4,473.84 Check Sequence: 31 06/26/2018 213-46522-443990 Check Sequence: 32 06/26/2018 101-45130-444140 Check Sequence: 33 06/26/2018 702-00000-432100 06/26/2018 702-00000-432100 06/26/2018 702-00000-432100 06/26/2018 702-00000-432100 06/26/2018 702-00000-432100 06/26/2018 702-00000-432100 06/26/2018 702-00000-432100 06/26/2018 702-00000-432100 06/26/2018 702-00000-432100 06/26/2018 702-00000-432100 06/26/2018 702-00000-432100 06/26/2018 702-00000-432300 06/26/2018 702-00000-432300 06/26/2018 702-00000-432300 06/26/2018 702-00000-432300 06/26/2018 702-00000-432300 06/26/2018 702-00000-432300 06/26/2018 702-00000-432300 06/26/2018 702-00000-432300 06/26/2018 702-00000-432300 06/26/2018 702-00000-432300 06/26/2018 101-41310-431990 06/26/2018 226-45127-432500 06/26/2018 702-00000-431900 06/26/2018 702-00000-431900 06/26/2018 702-00000-421990 06/26/2018 702-00000-431990 Reference ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: True AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/20/2018 - 3:36 PM) Page 6 Check Total: Vendor: 4973 MICHELLE EWING 6/19/2018 TIF 1-22 - Moving Costs #2 Check Total: Vendor: 4674 JENNIFER FEARING 6/18/2018 Face Painting @ Walk & Roll (2 hrs) Check Total: Vendor: 2273 FIBERNET MONTICELLO - ACH 6/8/2018 City Hall Phone - June 2018 6/8/2018 MCC Phone - June 2018 6/8/2018 Ballfields Phone - June 2018 6/8/2018 DMV Phone - June 2018 6/8/2018 Hi Way Liquor Phone - June 2018 6/8/2018 Fire Hall Phone - June 2018 6/8/2018 Public Works Phone - June 2018 6/8/2018 Parks Phone - June 2018 6/8/2018 Prairie Center Phone - June 2018 6/8/2018 Sheriff Phone - June 2018 6/8/2018 Friendship Island Phone - June 2018 6/8/2018 City Hall Internet - June 2018 6/8/2018 MCC Internet - June 2018 6/8/2018 Ballfields Internet - June 2018 6/8/2018 DMV Internet - June 2018 6/8/2018 Hi Way Liquor Internet - June 2018 6/8/2018 Fire Hall Internet - June 2018 6/8/2018 Animal Shelter Internet - June 2018 6/8/2018 Public Works Internet - June 2018 6/8/2018 Sheriff Internet - June 2018 6/8/2018 Friendship Island Internet - June 2018 6/8/2018 City Hall Cable - June 2018 6/8/2018 MCC Cable - June 2018 6/8/2018 Data Hosting - June 2018 6/8/2018 Service Contract - June 2018 6/8/2018 New Phone for PW Director (ML) - June 2018 6/8/2018 Service Call to Public Works - June 2018 Check Total: Amount Payment Date Acct Number 94.00 9,515.00 9,515.00 100.00 100.00 635.59 497.56 19.48 264.92 344.06 203.69 268.06 113.88 14.22 69.78 64.31 124.95 10.00 10.00 41.95 41.95 41.95 29.95 69.95 41.95 87.88 12.95 329.81 500.00 250.00 185.00 200.00 4,473.84 Check Sequence: 31 06/26/2018 213-46522-443990 Check Sequence: 32 06/26/2018 101-45130-444140 Check Sequence: 33 06/26/2018 702-00000-432100 06/26/2018 702-00000-432100 06/26/2018 702-00000-432100 06/26/2018 702-00000-432100 06/26/2018 702-00000-432100 06/26/2018 702-00000-432100 06/26/2018 702-00000-432100 06/26/2018 702-00000-432100 06/26/2018 702-00000-432100 06/26/2018 702-00000-432100 06/26/2018 702-00000-432100 06/26/2018 702-00000-432300 06/26/2018 702-00000-432300 06/26/2018 702-00000-432300 06/26/2018 702-00000-432300 06/26/2018 702-00000-432300 06/26/2018 702-00000-432300 06/26/2018 702-00000-432300 06/26/2018 702-00000-432300 06/26/2018 702-00000-432300 06/26/2018 702-00000-432300 06/26/2018 101-41310-431990 06/26/2018 226-45127-432500 06/26/2018 702-00000-431900 06/26/2018 702-00000-431900 06/26/2018 702-00000-421990 06/26/2018 702-00000-431990 Reference ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: True AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/20/2018 - 3:36 PM) Page 6 Invoice No Description Vendor: 4994 BETHANY FROSLIE 6/19/2018 TIF 1-22 - Moving Costs 6/19/2018 TIF 1-22 - Rental Supplement Check Total: Vendor: 3748 JEFFREY D GARDNER 6/15/2018 Farmers Market Token Collection Log - 6/14/18 Check Total: Vendor: 3762 GARRETTS DIAMOND CITY BREAD 6/15/2018 Farmers Market Token Collection Log - 5/17, 5/: Check Total: Vendor: 1205 GRAINGER INC 9811412387 High Capacity Pleated Filter 20x30x2 (12) Check Total: Vendor: 4048 MELISSA HARTNER 6/18/2018 Face Painting @ Walk & Roll 6/9/18 (2.5 hrs) Check Total: Vendor: 1223 HAWKINS INC 4295102 Aluminum Sulfate Liquid - WWTP 4296810 Pool Chemicals Check Total: Vendor: 4996 HERITAGE CONSTRUCTION COMPANIES I 6/19/2018 TIF 1-22 - Moving Costs 6/19/2018 TIF 1-22 - Business Re -Establishment Check Total: Vendor: 4910 HERREID & ASSOCIATES 1069 Training (JO & WO) 1069 Training (JO) 1069 Training (WO) Check Total: AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/20/2018 - 3:36 PM) Amount Payment Date Acct Number Check Sequence: 34 725.00 06/26/2018 213-46522-443990 15,666.00 06/26/2018 213-46522-443990 16,391.00 25.00 25.00 88.00 88.00 70.92 70.92 162.50 162.50 6,352.58 1,389.14 7,741.72 12,467.75 8,254.04 20,721.79 975.00 975.00 975.00 2,925.00 Check Sequence: 35 06/26/2018 226-45127-431992 Check Sequence: 36 06/26/2018 226-45127-431992 Check Sequence: 37 06/26/2018 226-45126-422990 Check Sequence: 38 06/26/2018 101-45130-444140 Check Sequence: 39 06/26/2018 602-49480-421990 06/26/2018 226-45124-421600 Check Sequence: 40 06/26/2018 213-46522-443990 06/26/2018 213-46522-443990 Check Sequence: 41 06/26/2018 101-41800-431960 06/26/2018 101-41310-433100 06/26/2018 101-41520-433100 Reference ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False Page 7 Invoice No Description Vendor: 1232 HILLYARD INC MINNEAPOLIS 700337879 Replaced Solenoid Valve on Floor Scrubber, Sq Check Sequence: 42 ACH Enabled: False Check Total: Vendor: 4218 HOHENSTEINS, INC 968153 resale - beer Check Total: Vendor: 4745 ILLINOIS CASUALTY COMPANY LL103171 2018 Acct. # 173222- Liquor Liability Ins. 7/1//18-7/1 1,444.65 Check Total: Vendor: 1259 JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING 2803186 ACH Enabled: False freight 2803186 609-49754-436100 resale - beer 2803186 resale - mix 2822 freight 2822 ACH Enabled: False resale - beer 2822 609-49750-433300 resale - beer n/a 3,166.85 06/26/2018 Check Total: Vendor: 1263 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 1022799 resale - liquor 1022799 609-49750-433300 freight 1022800 06/26/2018 resale - mix 1022800 78.05 freight 1023563 resale - liquor 1023563 freight 1023564 resale - mix 1023564 4,006.37 resale - wine 1023564 freight 1024767 609-49750-433300 resale - liquor 1024767 06/26/2018 freight 1024768 10.43 resale - wine 1024768 resale - mix 1024768 609-49750-425100 freight 1027389 06/26/2018 resale - liquor 1027389 88.00 freight 1027390 resale - wine 1027390 609-49750-425300 freight Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Check Sequence: 42 ACH Enabled: False 372.39 06/26/2018 226-45126-431990 372.39 Check Sequence: 43 ACH Enabled: False 1,444.65 06/26/2018 609-49750-425200 1,444.65 Check Sequence: 44 ACH Enabled: False 1,479.00 06/26/2018 609-49754-436100 1,479.00 Check Sequence: 45 ACH Enabled: False 3.00 06/26/2018 609-49750-433300 3,166.85 06/26/2018 609-49750-425200 49.15 06/26/2018 609-49750-425400 3.00 06/26/2018 609-49750-433300 4,679.57 06/26/2018 609-49750-425200 78.05 06/26/2018 609-49750-425400 7,979.62 Check Sequence: 46 ACH Enabled: False 4,006.37 06/26/2018 609-49750-425100 53.64 06/26/2018 609-49750-433300 210.00 06/26/2018 609-49750-425400 10.43 06/26/2018 609-49750-433300 7,405.95 06/26/2018 609-49750-425100 90.99 06/26/2018 609-49750-433300 88.00 06/26/2018 609-49750-425400 562.35 06/26/2018 609-49750-425300 23.84 06/26/2018 609-49750-433300 2,649.82 06/26/2018 609-49750-425100 23.59 06/26/2018 609-49750-433300 633.45 06/26/2018 609-49750-425300 53.00 06/26/2018 609-49750-425400 16.39 06/26/2018 609-49750-433300 2,256.75 06/26/2018 609-49750-425100 25.81 06/26/2018 609-49750-433300 811.70 06/26/2018 609-49750-425300 25.33 06/26/2018 609-49750-433300 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/20/2018 - 3:36 PM) Page 8 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 1029064 freight 91.16 06/26/2018 609-49750-433300 1029064 resale - liquor 7,650.31 06/26/2018 609-49750-425100 1029065 resale - wine 987.61 06/26/2018 609-49750-425300 1029065 resale - wine n/a 121.35 06/26/2018 609-49750-425400 1029065 freight 38.37 06/26/2018 609-49750-433300 1029066 resale - beer 239.56 06/26/2018 609-49750-425200 1030269 resale - liquor 1,181.55 06/26/2018 609-49750-425100 1030269 freight 19.37 06/26/2018 609-49750-433300 1030270 freight 40.98 06/26/2018 609-49750-433300 1030270 resale - wine 1,632.48 06/26/2018 609-49750-425300 1030270 resale - wine n/a 39.95 06/26/2018 609-49750-425400 1033015 resale - liquor 777.90 06/26/2018 609-49750-425100 1033015 freight 11.92 06/26/2018 609-49750-433300 1033016 freight 19.37 06/26/2018 609-49750-433300 1033016 resale - wine 625.65 06/26/2018 609-49750-425300 671652 resale - credit wine inv. 5938887 -8.29 06/26/2018 609-49750-425300 682200 resale - credit liquor inv. 1016359 -131.00 06/26/2018 609-49750-425100 682200 freight credit inv. 1016359 -1.49 06/26/2018 609-49750-433300 682544 freight credit inv. 1015824 -1.49 06/26/2018 609-49750-433300 683164 freight credit inv. 1023564 -1.49 06/26/2018 609-49750-433300 683164 resale - wine credit inv. 1023564 -38.60 06/26/2018 609-49750-425300 684171 freight credit inv. 1027390 -2.98 06/26/2018 609-49750-433300 684171 resale - wine credit inv. 1027390 -91.45 06/26/2018 609-49750-425300 Check Total: 32,148.15 Vendor: 4993 PAUL KILLIAN Check Sequence: 47 ACH Enabled: False 6/16/2018 Escrow Released - 5886 Deer St/Hillside Farms/ 2,000.00 06/26/2018 101-00000-220110 Check Total: 2,000.00 Vendor: 3829 STEVE LANGANKI Check Sequence: 48 ACH Enabled: True 1112 Porta Toilets (23) 4/29-5/26/2018 1,194.75 06/26/2018 101-45201-431990 Check Total: 1,194.75 Vendor: 4989 KEVIN LENHART Check Sequence: 49 ACH Enabled: False 6/18/2018 Performing at Music on the Mississippi 6/28/18 1,500.00 06/26/2018 101-45201-431990 Check Total: 1,500.00 Vendor: 4985 LEOTEK ELECTRONICS USA LLC Check Sequence: 50 ACH Enabled: False 1103579641 18C002 - Chelsea Rd (30) lights- 50% downpayi 2,550.00 06/26/2018 245-43162-453010 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/20/2018 - 3:36 PM) Page 9 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 2,550.00 Check Total: Vendor: 4456 LUPULIN BREWING LLC 12804 Check Sequence: 51 resale - beer True 162.00 Check Total: Vendor: 1303 M AMUNDSON CIGAR & CANDY CO, LLP 260242 resale - cigarettes 260242 resale - tobacco; barware; soda pop; etc Check Sequence: 52 Check Total: Vendor: 1229 MARRS ADVERTISING & DESIGN INC 1551 Walk & Roll Brochures (2,500) 669.41 06/26/2018 Check Total: Vendor: 3745 MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 20772198 (301) gal. diesel @ $2.86 20772205 (497) gal. unleaded @ $2.61 20793481 ACH Enabled: (845) gal. unleaded @ $2.73 20793495 06/26/2018 (741) gal. diesel @ $2.48 Check Total: Vendor: 1726 MARCO 6/12/2018 Konica C754 Buyout Check Sequence: 54 ACH Enabled: Check Total: Vendor: 1308 MARCOINC 359785037 6/10/18 - 7/10/18 Contract Payment 06/26/2018 101-43120-421200 Check Total: Vendor: 1314 MCDOWALL COMPANY 607816 Annual Maintenance Agreement Contract #C051 607817 06/26/2018 Annual Maintenance Agreement Contract #C051 607818 Qtrly Maintenance Contract #C0520 - MCC 6/1/ Check Total: Vendor: 1827 MIDWEST LANDSCAPES Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 2,550.00 Check Sequence: 51 ACH Enabled: True 162.00 06/26/2018 609-49750-425200 162.00 Check Sequence: 52 ACH Enabled: True 1,091.75 06/26/2018 609-49750-425500 669.41 06/26/2018 609-49750-425400 1,761.16 Check Sequence: 53 ACH Enabled: True 579.00 06/26/2018 101-45130-444140 579.00 Check Sequence: 54 ACH Enabled: True 861.41 06/26/2018 101-43120-421200 1,296.85 06/26/2018 101-43120-421200 2,3 07.31 06/26/2018 101-43120-421200 1,838.08 06/26/2018 101-43120-421200 6,303.65 Check Sequence: 55 ACH Enabled: False 3,678.76 06/26/2018 702-00000-424100 3,678.76 Check Sequence: 56 ACH Enabled: True 2,458.34 06/26/2018 702-00000-441500 2,458.34 Check Sequence: 57 ACH Enabled: False 180.00 06/26/2018 101-41941-431900 342.00 06/26/2018 101-45501-431990 466.00 06/26/2018 226-45126-431990 988.00 Check Sequence: 58 ACH Enabled: False AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/20/2018 - 3:36 PM) Page 10 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference I4126 Hackberry; Sienna Glen Mpl; Fall Fiesta Maple 857.50 06/26/2018 101-45201-422500 Check Total: 857.50 Vendor: 1330 CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS Check Sequence: 59 ACH Enabled: True 400451002045 April 2018 - Monti Pawn Transactions (190) 171.00 06/26/2018 101-42100-431990 Check Total: 171.00 Vendor: 1370 MONTICELLO DEPUTY REG #002 Check Sequence: 60 ACH Enabled: False 5603 VIN MN Sales Tax, Title, Regist - 2018 Ford Pickup' 1,948.44 06/26/2018 601-00000-165010 Check Total: 1,948.44 Vendor: 1377 MONTICELLO SENIOR CENTER Check Sequence: 61 ACH Enabled: True June 2018 Monthly Allocation - June 2018 5,013.33 06/26/2018 101-45175-444310 Check Total: 5,013.33 Vendor: 4988 BARBARA ANN MOON Check Sequence: 62 ACH Enabled: False 6/18/2018 Performance at Farmers Market as "Aunt Poopsi 125.00 06/26/2018 101-45201-431990 Check Total: 125.00 Vendor: 1687 NORTHLAND SECURITIES INC Check Sequence: 63 ACH Enabled: False 5312 TIF Management - TIF 1-40 2,970.00 06/26/2018 213-46301-431990 Check Total: 2,970.00 Vendor: 1401 NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS Check Sequence: 64 ACH Enabled: True 23640 May 2018 - Technical Assistance - City Projects 1,825.72 06/26/2018 101-41910-431990 23641 201815 - Haven Ridge - May 2018 577.50 06/26/2018 101-00000-220110 23641 201808 - Briggs Multi Family - May 2018 1,705.74 06/26/2018 101-00000-220110 23641 201819 - Bondhus - May 2018 82.50 06/26/2018 101-00000-220110 23641 201823 - Bergstrom Variance - May 2018 820.62 06/26/2018 101-00000-220110 23641 201821 - Oakwood Industrial Park 3rd Addition 811.62 06/26/2018 101-00000-220110 23641 Twin Cities Staffing - May 2018 99.00 06/26/2018 101-41910-431990 23641 Karlsburger Expansion - May 2018 165.00 06/26/2018 101-41910-431990 23642 May 2018 - Technical Assistance - Meetings 150.00 06/26/2018 101-41910-431990 Check Total: 6,237.70 Vendor: 4982 TONY OLIVA Check Sequence: 65 ACH Enabled: False RvrFst 2018 RiverFest Appearance 7/14/18- Hi -Way Liquor 3,000.00 06/26/2018 609-49754-425550 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/20/2018 - 3:36 PM) Page 11 Invoice No Description Check Total: Vendor: 4986 PETERSON SALT & WATER TREATMENT 157988 Fleck 2900 5 Metered Water Softner Check Total: Check Total: Vendor: 1411 OLSON & SONS ELECTRIC INC 18535 resale - liquor photo cell freight 2367217 Check Total: Vendor: 1635 OSI ENVIRONMENTAL INC 2072690 2367218 (1) dr uncrushed filters 2368056 freight Check Total: Vendor: 1273 PAUSTIS & SONS WINE CO 13553 resale - wine resale - wine 13553 180.00 freight 14313 resale - wine 14313 609-49750-433300 freight 641.34 06/26/2018 Check Total: Vendor: 4633 PERFORMANCE FOOD GROUP INC 52012419 Cheese Sauce for Concessoin Check Total: Vendor: 4986 PETERSON SALT & WATER TREATMENT 157988 Fleck 2900 5 Metered Water Softner Amount Payment Date Acct Number 3,000.00 Reference Check Total: Vendor: 1427 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS CO 2334862 freight 2366732 resale - liquor 2366732 freight 2367217 freight 2367217 resale - liquor 2367218 resale - mix 2367218 freight 2368056 freight 2368056 resale - liquor 2368057 freight 2368057 resale - wine 2369939 freight Amount Payment Date Acct Number 3,000.00 Reference AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/20/2018 - 3:36 PM) Page 12 Check Sequence: 66 ACH Enabled: True 16.32 06/26/2018 101-43160-421530 16.32 Check Sequence: 67 ACH Enabled: False 50.00 06/26/2018 101-43127-421990 50.00 Check Sequence: 68 ACH Enabled: False 180.00 06/26/2018 609-49750-425300 8.75 06/26/2018 609-49750-433300 641.34 06/26/2018 609-49750-425300 10.00 06/26/2018 609-49750-433300 840.09 Check Sequence: 69 ACH Enabled: True 112.74 06/26/2018 226-45125-425410 112.74 Check Sequence: 70 ACH Enabled: False 9,643.00 06/26/2018 226-45126-424100 9,643.00 Check Sequence: 71 ACH Enabled: False 4.50 06/26/2018 609-49750-433300 1,321.70 06/26/2018 609-49750-425100 20.86 06/26/2018 609-49750-433300 49.65 06/26/2018 609-49750-433300 3,582.19 06/26/2018 609-49750-425100 168.00 06/26/2018 609-49750-425400 5.96 06/26/2018 609-49750-433300 7.45 06/26/2018 609-49750-433300 560.95 06/26/2018 609-49750-425100 11.92 06/26/2018 609-49750-433300 352.00 06/26/2018 609-49750-425300 8.94 06/26/2018 609-49750-433300 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/20/2018 - 3:36 PM) Page 12 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 2369939 resale - liquor 909.00 06/26/2018 609-49750-425100 2369940 freight 11.92 06/26/2018 609-49750-433300 2369940 resale - liquor 138.00 06/26/2018 609-49750-425100 2369940 resale - wine 224.00 06/26/2018 609-49750-425300 2370899 freight 53.65 06/26/2018 609-49750-433300 2370899 resale - liquor 3,953.85 06/26/2018 609-49750-425100 2370900 resale - wine 807.50 06/26/2018 609-49750-425300 2370900 resale - wine n/a 247.50 06/26/2018 609-49750-425400 2370900 freight 35.76 06/26/2018 609-49750-433300 2371797 freight 11.92 06/26/2018 609-49750-433300 2371797 resale - liquor 918.40 06/26/2018 609-49750-425100 2371798 resale - wine 1,315.00 06/26/2018 609-49750-425300 2371798 freight 28.32 06/26/2018 609-49750-433300 2373771 freight 16.39 06/26/2018 609-49750-433300 2373771 resale - liquor 1,057.64 06/26/2018 609-49750-425100 2373772 resale - wine 420.00 06/26/2018 609-49750-425300 2373772 freight 11.92 06/26/2018 609-49750-433300 296479 freight credit inv. 2367217 -0.25 06/26/2018 609-49750-433300 296479 resale liquor credit inv. 2367217 -23.50 06/26/2018 609-49750-425100 Check Total: 16,231.14 Vendor: 4991 BERNARD PIATZ Check Sequence: 72 ACH Enabled: True 6/15/2018 Farmers Market Token Collection Log - 6/7/18 6 59.00 06/26/2018 226-45127-431992 Check Total: 59.00 Vendor: 3313 PRO HYDRO TESTING Check Sequence: 73 ACH Enabled: False 102836 (54) Air tank inspection (required every 5 yrs) 1,622.95 06/26/2018 101-42200-431990 Check Total: 1,622.95 Vendor: 4983 RADIANT MANUFACTURING Check Sequence: 74 ACH Enabled: False 3220 Shimmer Wall- Central MN Arts Board funded 8 12,418.00 06/26/2018 101-45204-458010 Check Total: 12,418.00 Vendor: 1455 RED'S MARATHON Check Sequence: 75 ACH Enabled: False 052518 -PW (2) 5 gal Oxy Fuel Cans- Streets 31.35 06/26/2018 101-43120-421200 May 18 -Parks #231; #220 -Oxy Fuel Cans- pParks 58.54 06/26/2018 101-45201-421200 Check Total: 89.89 Vendor: 4022 REINHART FOODSERVICE LLC Check Sequence: 76 ACH Enabled: True AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/20/2018 - 3:36 PM) Page 13 Invoice No Description 328946 Food for Concession Resale 328946 Snacks for F.I. - Cereal Bars, Crackers, Pudding 332476 Food for Concession Resale Check Total: Vendor: 4513 AARON STAEHNKE 6/15/2018 Farmers Market Token Collection Log - 6/14/18 Check Total: Amount Payment Date Acct Number 306.38 06/26/2018 226-45125-425410 554.59 06/26/2018 226-45127-421981 387.53 06/26/2018 226-45125-425410 1,248.50 508.00 9.00 517.00 1,593.75 1,593.75 1,650.00 650.00 2,300.00 38.00 38.00 1,970.06 21.00 770.00 16.92 3,546.24 38.03 30.80 908.00 7,301.05 40.00 40.00 Check Sequence: 77 06/26/2018 609-49750-425300 06/26/2018 609-49750-433300 Check Sequence: 78 06/26/2018 101-42700-431200 Check Sequence: 79 06/26/2018 651-49010-431050 06/26/2018 101-45201-431050 Check Sequence: 80 06/26/2018 226-45127-431992 Check Sequence: 81 06/26/2018 609-49750-425100 06/26/2018 609-49750-433300 06/26/2018 609-49750-425300 06/26/2018 609-49750-433300 06/26/2018 609-49750-425100 06/26/2018 609-49750-433300 06/26/2018 609-49750-433300 06/26/2018 609-49750-425300 Check Sequence: 82 06/26/2018 226-45127-431992 Reference ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: True AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/20/2018 - 3:36 PM) Page 14 Check Total: Vendor: 4781 RUE 38 LLC 3457 resale - wine 3457 freight Check Total: Vendor: 1474 PATRICIA A SALZWEDEL June 2nd Semi Monthly Contract Payment Check Total: Vendor: 4981 STEVE SCHILLEWAERT 51828 dba Aqua Green- Riverside Cem- May -mow; SI 51829 dba Aqua Green- Hillside Cem- May -mow; Sp. Check Total: Vendor: 4990 PATRICIA J SCOTT 6/15/2018 Farmers Market Token Collection Log - 6/7/18 Check Total: Vendor: 3309 SOUTHERN GLAZER'S WINE AND SPIRITS. 1691639 resale - liquor 1691639 freight 1691640 resale - wine 1691640 freight 1694463 resale - liquor 1694463 freight 1694464 freight 1694464 resale - wine Check Total: Vendor: 4513 AARON STAEHNKE 6/15/2018 Farmers Market Token Collection Log - 6/14/18 Check Total: Amount Payment Date Acct Number 306.38 06/26/2018 226-45125-425410 554.59 06/26/2018 226-45127-421981 387.53 06/26/2018 226-45125-425410 1,248.50 508.00 9.00 517.00 1,593.75 1,593.75 1,650.00 650.00 2,300.00 38.00 38.00 1,970.06 21.00 770.00 16.92 3,546.24 38.03 30.80 908.00 7,301.05 40.00 40.00 Check Sequence: 77 06/26/2018 609-49750-425300 06/26/2018 609-49750-433300 Check Sequence: 78 06/26/2018 101-42700-431200 Check Sequence: 79 06/26/2018 651-49010-431050 06/26/2018 101-45201-431050 Check Sequence: 80 06/26/2018 226-45127-431992 Check Sequence: 81 06/26/2018 609-49750-425100 06/26/2018 609-49750-433300 06/26/2018 609-49750-425300 06/26/2018 609-49750-433300 06/26/2018 609-49750-425100 06/26/2018 609-49750-433300 06/26/2018 609-49750-433300 06/26/2018 609-49750-425300 Check Sequence: 82 06/26/2018 226-45127-431992 Reference ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: True AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/20/2018 - 3:36 PM) Page 14 Invoice No Description Vendor: 1897 STEPP MANUFACTURING CO INC 54001 2nd Truck- HK Upfit - Streets 54001 Check Sequence: 83 Ref. inv. #53967- decided not to trade in, but sel Enabled: False Check Total: Vendor: 1518 TDS TELECOM 763-271-3257 TDS 763-295-2005 TDS 763-295-3714 TDS Check Total: Vendor: 4984 THE LUMINAIRES GROUP U.S.A 6688 18C002 - (58) Lights - 50% downpayment Check Sequence: 84 Check Total: Vendor: 4859 TRIO SUPPLY COMPANY 459662 702-00000-432100 (2) cs. toilet tis; (2) cs cups; (6) cs. can liner; etc Check Total: Vendor: 4248 ALEAH TUCKER 6/18/2018 Performance at 2018 Farmer's Market 6/28/18 06/26/2018 702-00000-432100 Check Total: Vendor: 1537 UHL COMPANY INC 2819 Cover Sensor Check Total: Vendor: 2813 UNION SPEED & STYLE 6/8/2018 False Refund Duplicate Assessment Payoff 06/26/2018 245-43162-453010 Check Total: Vendor: 1544 US POSTAL SERVICE 6/8/2018 PI 42 - UB June Mailing (3,745 pcs) (1/2) 6/8/2018 PI 42 - UB June Mailing (3,745 pcs) (1/2) 6/8/2018 Check Sequence: 86 Postage for Mailing of Insert w/May UB Invoice Check Total: AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/20/2018 - 3:36 PM) Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Check Sequence: 83 ACH Enabled: False 2,560.00 06/26/2018 101-43120-424100 2,000.00 06/26/2018 703-00000-165010 4,560.00 Check Sequence: 84 ACH Enabled: True 95.10 06/26/2018 702-00000-432100 19.12 06/26/2018 702-00000-432100 338.23 06/26/2018 702-00000-432100 452.45 Check Sequence: 85 ACH Enabled: False 40,392.50 06/26/2018 245-43162-453010 40,392.50 Check Sequence: 86 ACH Enabled: False 637.52 06/26/2018 101-45201-421650 637.52 Check Sequence: 87 ACH Enabled: False 100.00 06/26/2018 101-45201-431990 100.00 Check Sequence: 88 ACH Enabled: True 29.00 06/26/2018 226-45126-422990 29.00 Check Sequence: 89 ACH Enabled: False 737.11 06/26/2018 101-00000-202010 737.11 Check Sequence: 90 ACH Enabled: False 643.21 06/26/2018 601-49440-432200 643.20 06/26/2018 602-49490-432200 428.80 06/26/2018 656-00000-202099 1,715.21 Page 15 Invoice No Description Vendor: 1552 VIKING COCA COLA BOTTLING CO 2115109 resale - beer 2162897 resale - soda, mix 2168815 resale - beer n/a Check Total: Vendor: 1684 VINOCOPIA 0208387 -IN freight 0208387 -IN resale - mix 0208387 -IN resale - liquor 0208387 -IN resale - wine 0208903 freight 0208903 resale - wine 0208903 resale - liquor Check Total: Vendor: 1561 WATER LABORATORIES INC 6847 May 2018 Water Samples Check Total: Vendor: 1567 WES OLSON ELECTRIC LLC 8721 Materials - Ballasts (6), Wire Nuts, 8721 Labor - Install Ballasts (6) Check Total: Vendor: 4766 SUSAN WESTLEY Mau 2018 Sue Seeger- Creative Arts Srvc- May 2018 Check Total: Vendor: 1756 WIGEN COMPANIES INC 20481 Systemax Programmed for 1 Unit Check Total: Vendor: 1572 THE WINE COMPANY 73462 freight 73462 resale - wine Check Total: AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/20/2018 - 3:36 PM) Amount Payment Date Acct Number Check Sequence: 91 50.00 06/26/2018 609-49750-425200 293.00 06/26/2018 609-49750-425400 439.00 06/26/2018 609-49750-425400 782.00 16.50 120.00 353.00 200.00 16.00 208.00 701.00 1,614.50 240.00 240.00 218.42 225.00 443.42 2,500.00 2,500.00 885.75 885.75 6.30 456.00 462.30 Check Sequence: 92 06/26/2018 609-49750-433300 06/26/2018 609-49750-425400 06/26/2018 609-49750-425100 06/26/2018 609-49750-425300 06/26/2018 609-49750-433300 06/26/2018 609-49750-425300 06/26/2018 609-49750-425100 Check Sequence: 93 06/26/2018 601-49440-422740 Check Sequence: 94 06/26/2018 226-45126-431990 06/26/2018 226-45126-431990 Check Sequence: 95 06/26/2018 101-45204-431990 Check Sequence: 96 06/26/2018 226-45126-431990 Check Sequence: 97 06/26/2018 609-49750-433300 06/26/2018 609-49750-425300 Reference ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: True Page 16 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Vendor: 1573 WINE MERCHANTS INC Check Sequence: 98 ACH Enabled: False 7186249 freight 4.96 06/26/2018 609-49750-433300 7186249 resale - wine 158.00 06/26/2018 609-49750-425300 7187204 freight 4.47 06/26/2018 609-49750-433300 7187204 resale - wine 336.00 06/26/2018 609-49750-425300 Check Total: 503.43 Vendor: 1577 WRIGHT CO AUDITOR-TREAS - ACH Check Sequence: 99 ACH Enabled: True 6/12/2018 Court Fines & Fees - May 2018 3,792.99 06/26/2018 101-42100-430410 Check Total: 3,792.99 Vendor: 1581 WRIGHT CO RECORDER Check Sequence: 100 ACH Enabled: False 201800000048 201811 - Variance - Stevens A# 1370453 46.00 06/26/2018 101-41910-431990 201800000048 201810 - CUP - Central MN Mental Health A# 46.00 06/26/2018 101-41910-431990 Check Total: 92.00 Vendor: 1584 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC Check Sequence: 101 ACH Enabled: True 001160-61183 Traffic Engineering Services Phase 6 - April 201 364.00 06/26/2018 101-43111-430300 001494-780 30 MS4/SEPPP Services - April 2018 392.00 06/26/2018 101-43111-430300 002596-010 40 General Engineering Services Phase 7 - April 20 2,740.00 06/26/2018 101-43111-430300 002596-010 40 General Engineering Services Phase 7 - April 20 2,740.00 06/26/2018 601-49440-430300 002596-010 40 General Engineering Services Phase 7 - April 20 2,740.00 06/26/2018 602-49490-430300 002596-010 40 General Engineering Services Phase 8 - April 20 1,317.00 06/26/2018 101-43111-430300 002596-020 16 State Aid Network - April 2018 205.00 06/26/2018 101-43111-430300 002596-030 31 Maps - April 2018 682.00 06/26/2018 101-43111-430300 002596-040 31 GIS Support Services - April 2018 837.00 06/26/2018 702-00000-431990 002596-160 28 15C004 - 7th Street/TH 25 Intersection Improves 112.00 06/26/2018 400-43300-430300 002596-300 10 16C004 - CR 39/Gillard Ave Intersection ImproN 1,035.00 06/26/2018 400-43300-459017 002596-360 19 16C003 - 2017 Street Improvements - April 201 3,272.50 06/26/2018 400-43300-459016 002596-400 15 16C006 - Fallon Ave Improvements - April 2018 113,135.00 06/26/2018 400-43300-459018 R001673-000 2 201808 - Brigg's Properties Plan Review - April 1,163.50 06/26/2018 101-00000-220110 R010438-000 10 17C001 - Chelsea Road Utility & Street Improve 25,434.00 06/26/2018 400-43300-459019 R010965-000 5 Relocation Assistance Related to Downtown Rec 7,045.93 06/26/2018 213-46301-431990 R011121-000 4 2018 Economic Development Services- April 20 700.00 06/26/2018 213-46301-431990 R011473-000 4 18C001 - 2018 Pedestrian Improvements - April 9,080.00 06/26/2018 400-43300-430300 R011770-000 2 XSESWR-XSTUDY - SE Service Area Sewer E 6,770.00 06/26/2018 602-49480-430300 R011898-000 1 201819 - Bondhus Addition Plan Review - Apri 594.75 06/26/2018 101-00000-220110 R011923-000 1 201820 - Haven Ridge Plan Review - April 201: 513.25 06/26/2018 101-00000-220110 R012098-000 1 18C002 - 2018 Street Lighting Improvements - E 1,485.00 06/26/2018 245-43162-453010 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/20/2018 - 3:36 PM) Page 17 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Check Total: 182,357.93 Vendor: 4995 JAMES QUENTIN YOUNG Check Sequence: 102 6/18/2018 Business Re -Establishment 160.31 06/26/2018 213-46522-443990 Check Total: 160.31 Total for Check Run: 597,676.85 Total of Number of Checks: 102 Reference ACH Enabled: False The preceding list of bills payable was reviewed and approved for payment. Date 6/25/18 Approved by ❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑ Mayor Brian Stumpf AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/20/2018 - 3:36 PM) Page 18 Accounts Payable Computer Check Proof List by Vendor User: Julie.Cheney Printed: 06/20/2018 - 3:39PM Batch: 00201.06.2018 - 201.06.2018 US Bank Invoice No Description Vendor: 4263 CAYAN 672779 May 2018 (15,634) Transaction Fee 672779 May 2018 (3) Genius Service Fee- cc machine re Check Total: Vendor: 3241 LINCOLN FINANCIAL GROUP 6/1/2018 June 2018 Amount Payment Date Acct Number Check Sequence: 1 1,094.38 06/15/2018 609-49754-443980 89.85 06/15/2018 609-49754-424100 1,184.23 Check Sequence: 2 1,746.59 06/15/2018 101-00000-217066 1,746.59 Check Sequence: 3 263.16 Check Total: Vendor: 1593 MN DEPT OF REVENUE - ACH May May Sales Tax - General May May Sales Tax - General May May Waste Tax - General May May Waste Tax - General May May Sales Tax - MCC May May Sales Tax - MCC May May Sales Tax - Water May May Sales Tax - Water May May Sales Tax - Cemetary May May Sales Tax - Hi Way Liquor May May Sales Tax - Hi Way Liquor 651-00000-208100 Check Total: Vendor: 4470 US BANK - BONDS 0020373NS GO Bonds 2014A - Interest 0020373NS GO Bonds 2014A - Interest 0029083NS GO Bonds 201513- Street Reconstruction & Impi 0040903NS GO Bonds 2016A - Street Reconstruction & Imp 0051724NS GO Bonds 2017A - Interest Amount Payment Date Acct Number Check Sequence: 1 1,094.38 06/15/2018 609-49754-443980 89.85 06/15/2018 609-49754-424100 1,184.23 Check Sequence: 2 1,746.59 06/15/2018 101-00000-217066 1,746.59 Check Sequence: 3 263.16 06/15/2018 101-00000-208100 -0.16 06/15/2018 101-00000-362900 102.24 06/15/2018 101-00000-208120 -1.24 06/15/2018 101-00000-362900 8,421.85 06/15/2018 226-00000-208100 0.15 06/15/2018 226-45126-443990 1,153.84 06/15/2018 601-00000-208100 0.16 06/15/2018 601-49440-443990 11.00 06/15/2018 651-00000-208100 53,118.82 06/15/2018 609-00000-208100 0.18 06/15/2018 609-49750-443990 63,070.00 Check Sequence: 4 78,493.13 06/15/2018 318-47000-461100 4,886.25 06/15/2018 703-00000-461100 27,625.00 06/15/2018 319-47000-461100 46,075.00 06/15/2018 320-47000-461100 72,790.67 06/15/2018 321-47000-461100 Moiiii6effo Y Reference ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: True AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/20/2018 - 3:39 PM) Page 1 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Check Total: 229,870.05 Vendor: 2811 US BANK CORPORATE PMT SYSTEM Check Sequence: 5 6/6/2018 Holiday - Unleaded Fuel 8.732 gallons @ $2.89 25.31 06/15/2018 217-41990-421200 6/6/2018 NBP - Paper, White Out, Clips 61.90 06/15/2018 226-45122-421990 6/6/2018 NBP - Kleenex, Stapler 38.88 06/15/2018 217-41990-421990 6/6/2018 G & K - Inv# 6043213139 19.60 06/15/2018 101-45501-431990 6/6/2018 G & K - Inv# 6043247947 44.84 06/15/2018 226-45126-431990 6/6/2018 Cintas - Inv# 4006123401, 4005974658, 400574 138.03 06/15/2018 226-45126-431990 6/6/2018 Cintas - Inv# 4005974657 19.60 06/15/2018 101-45501-431990 6/6/2018 Fleet Farm - Computer Cable 4.89 06/15/2018 226-45126-422990 6/6/2018 Sprint Aquatics - Floating Fins, Ducks 122.55 06/15/2018 226-45124-421990 6/6/2018 Dacotah Paper - Bathroom & Lockerroom Suppl 642.82 06/15/2018 226-45126-421990 6/6/2018 Dacotah Paper - Bathroom & Lockerroom Suppl 422.38 06/15/2018 226-45126-421990 6/6/2018 NBP - Pencils, Paper, Tape, Post Its 355.30 06/15/2018 101-41310-421990 6/6/2018 Verizon - April 11 - May 10 25.02 06/15/2018 101-43115-432100 6/6/2018 Verizon - April 4 - May 3 -4.97 06/15/2018 101-42400-432100 6/6/2018 Verizon - April 4 - May 3 31.38 06/15/2018 226-45122-432100 6/6/2018 Verizon - April 4 - May 3 41.38 06/15/2018 101-43120-432100 6/6/2018 Verizon - April 4 - May 3 46.11 06/15/2018 601-49440-432100 6/6/2018 Verizon - April 4 - May 3 46.11 06/15/2018 602-49490-432100 6/6/2018 Advanced Disposal - April 2018 37,710.84 06/15/2018 101-43230-438400 6/6/2018 Advanced Disposal - April 2018 - Recycling 12,951.40 06/15/2018 101-43230-438400 6/6/2018 Advanced Disposal - April 2018 35.80 06/15/2018 101-43127-438400 6/6/2018 Advanced Disposal - April 2018 47.74 06/15/2018 101-45201-438400 6/6/2018 Advanced Disposal - April 2018 23.87 06/15/2018 101-45201-438400 6/6/2018 Advanced Disposal - April 2018 113.38 06/15/2018 602-49480-438400 6/6/2018 Advanced Disposal - April 2018 208.87 06/15/2018 226-45126-438400 6/6/2018 Advanced Disposal - April 2018 23.87 06/15/2018 609-49754-438400 6/6/2018 Advanced Disposal - April 2018 23.87 06/15/2018 101-45201-438400 6/6/2018 Advanced Disposal - April 2018 11.93 06/15/2018 101-45501-431990 6/6/2018 Advanced Disposal - April 2018 - GFEE 1,265.27 06/15/2018 101-00000-208120 6/6/2018 American Red Cross - Lifeguard Re Certificatioi 36.00 06/15/2018 226-45122-433100 6/6/2018 Home Depot.com - Commerical Door Hinge w/E 68.94 06/15/2018 226-45126-422990 6/6/2018 Home Depot.com - 50 Ft Over Floor Cord Protec 95.97 06/15/2018 226-45126-422990 6/6/2018 Walmart - Bikes for Walk & Roll (35) 2,503.88 06/15/2018 101-45130-444140 6/6/2018 General Rental - CO2 Tanks (2) 42.50 06/15/2018 226-45126-422990 6/6/2018 Walmart - Bikes for Walk & Roll (8) 389.96 06/15/2018 101-45130-444140 6/6/2018 Fleet Farm - Bikes for Walk & Roll (19) 1,765.70 06/15/2018 101-45130-444140 6/6/2018 Walmart - Bikes for Walk & Roll (2) 19.94 06/15/2018 101-45130-444140 6/6/2018 Target - Food for EDA Meeting 5/9/18 28.21 06/15/2018 213-46301-443990 6/6/2018 Monti Printing - Approved Stamps (4) 130.00 06/15/2018 101-42400-424100 Reference ACH Enabled: True AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/20/2018 - 3:39 PM) Page 2 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 6/6/2018 Gradys - Misc Plumbing Parts - Prairie Center Y 3.29 06/15/2018 226-45126-422990 6/6/2018 Target - Food for Meeting w/New School Superi 8.77 06/15/2018 101-41310-443990 6/6/2018 Amazon - Coffee 57.88 06/15/2018 101-41310-421990 6/6/2018 Amazon - File Folders 72.99 06/15/2018 226-45122-421990 6/6/2018 Monti Chamber - March Chamber Lunch (JT) 15.00 06/15/2018 213-46301-443990 6/6/2018 Monti Chamber - Action Coach Workshop & Bn 45.00 06/15/2018 226-45122-433100 6/6/2018 Monti Chamber - March Chamber Lunch (4) 60.00 06/15/2018 226-45122-433100 6/6/2018 A E Michaels - Transition Shims for Flooring 38.66 06/15/2018 226-45126-422990 6/6/2018 A E Michaels - Johnsonite 3" Tightlock Base for 108.17 06/15/2018 101-41940-421990 6/6/2018 Franklin Graphics - Advertising Banner for Gym 75.00 06/15/2018 226-45122-431990 6/6/2018 Econlodge - GFOA Conf 5/5/18 - 5/7/18 (WO) 171.00 06/15/2018 101-41520-433100 6/6/2018 St.Louis Metro Link - GFOA Conf (WO) 7.50 06/15/2018 101-41520-433100 6/6/2018 Banners.com - Music on the Mississippi Banner 153.04 06/15/2018 101-45204-443990 6/6/2018 G & K - Inv# 6043259476 19.60 06/15/2018 101-45501-431990 6/6/2018 G & K - Inv# 6043253669, 6043259477 92.34 06/15/2018 226-45126-431990 6/6/2018 Mailfinance - Postage Machine Lease Payment ( 564.33 06/15/2018 101-41310-441500 6/6/2018 Verizon - March 21 - April 20 35.01 06/15/2018 101-43115-432100 6/6/2018 Verizon - March 21 - April 20 26.02 06/15/2018 101-43120-432100 6/6/2018 Verizon - March 21 - April 20 140.04 06/15/2018 101-42200-432100 6/6/2018 ThyssenKrupp - Maintenance Agreement 5/1/18 596.08 06/15/2018 226-45126-431990 6/6/2018 Dacotah Paper - Bathroom & Lockerroom Suppl 1,121.27 06/15/2018 226-45126-421990 6/6/2018 Dacotah Paper - Concession Supplies: Plates, G1 210.66 06/15/2018 226-45125-421990 6/6/2018 Amazon - Permit Bags (1,000) 108.96 06/15/2018 101-42400-421990 6/6/2018 NBP - Paper 93.45 06/15/2018 226-45122-421990 6/6/2018 Dollar Tree - Cars (2), Spinners (2) - Walk & Ro 4.30 06/15/2018 217-41990-421990 6/6/2018 Walmart - Walk & Roll Giveaway Items: Playdo 39.69 06/15/2018 217-41990-421990 6/6/2018 General Rental - ZPARKS-RWOODS - rebar she 15.00 06/15/2018 229-45202-453010 6/6/2018 Fastenal - (50) ca. HCS3/8-16x2 1/225; ect 17.43 06/15/2018 101-45201-421650 6/6/2018 Runnings -(50) rope clip 17.50 06/15/2018 101-45203-421990 6/6/2018 Runnings -Adopt a Park- median flowers 17.99 06/15/2018 101-45201-440900 6/6/2018 Gradys -(2) handle; (2) roller- Crack Filling 19.76 06/15/2018 101-43120-421990 6/6/2018 Monti Napa - #130 & #179 - Tankweld Rep. kit; 20.17 06/15/2018 101-43120-422100 6/6/2018 Monti Napa - oil; (2) hose end; weathershield 22.56 06/15/2018 101-43120-422100 6/6/2018 Home Depot - mailbox w/flag 24.97 06/15/2018 101-43120-421990 6/6/2018 Runnings - (2) garage door side lock; metal scree 25.37 06/15/2018 101-45201-421650 6/6/2018 Fastenal - (12) 17 oz. Rustol blue 29.64 06/15/2018 601-49440-421990 6/6/2018 Cub - 201b. ice; (2) 9oz. Dixie cups 10.05 06/15/2018 101-43120-421990 6/6/2018 Runnings -brazing rod 11.99 06/15/2018 101-43127-421520 6/6/2018 Monti Napa -#179 - radiator repair kit 12.61 06/15/2018 101-43120-422100 6/6/2018 Holiday - (2) 4pk AAA batteries 12.86 06/15/2018 609-49754-421990 6/6/2018 Gradys -(2) duct tape 13.18 06/15/2018 602-49490-421990 6/6/2018 Runnings - Flag - 3pc steel kit 14.99 06/15/2018 101-45201-421650 6/6/2018 Gradys - hex cap 1.79 06/15/2018 101-43120-422100 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/20/2018 - 3:39 PM) Page 3 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 6/6/2018 Runnings - parts for pole saw 3.56 06/15/2018 101-46102-421990 6/6/2018 USPS - fluoride sample 3.75 06/15/2018 601-49440-432200 6/6/2018 Gradys - poultry staples 3.99 06/15/2018 101-45201-421650 6/6/2018 Runnings - #179 -J -B Kwikweld 4.69 06/15/2018 101-43120-422100 6/6/2018 Gradys -(2) 250pk keyblank 5.38 06/15/2018 101-45201-421650 6/6/2018 Monti Napa - respirator 5.94 06/15/2018 101-43120-420650 6/6/2018 Runnings -ZPARKS-RWOODS- (3) conduit elec 6.56 06/15/2018 229-45202-453010 6/6/2018 Cub - Host Wr. Co. Fire Chf. Qtr. Meet - (2) gal 8.38 06/15/2018 101-42200-421990 6/6/2018 Monti Napa 4123 - starter 9.08 06/15/2018 101-43120-422110 6/6/2018 O'Reilly - capsule 9.18 06/15/2018 601-49440-422110 6/6/2018 USPS - 201742 - Certified Mail for Clear Creek 4.87 06/15/2018 101-41910-432200 6/6/2018 USPS - Certified Letters (2) 13.40 06/15/2018 226-45122-432200 6/6/2018 Office Max - Laminating (18) 30.45 06/15/2018 226-45122-421990 6/6/2018 Office Max - Pens, Notes, 36.50 06/15/2018 226-45122-421990 6/6/2018 Runnings - Pressure Washer 129.99 06/15/2018 226-45126-422990 6/6/2018 Gradys - Hose Coupler, Mouse Traps 12.18 06/15/2018 226-45126-422990 6/6/2018 Gradys - Caullk, Bolt Barrel, Fasteners, Foam R 22.61 06/15/2018 226-45126-422990 6/6/2018 Monti Napa - Clips for Fitness Machine 5.49 06/15/2018 226-45126-421990 6/6/2018 Holiday - Unleaded Fuel 9.038 gallons @ $2.59 23.49 06/15/2018 217-41990-421200 6/6/2018 Home Depot - Shower Curtain & Rings for Fami 14.88 06/15/2018 226-45126-422990 6/6/2018 Home Depot - Hose for Hand Held Shower - Wo 19.38 06/15/2018 226-45126-422990 6/6/2018 MN Dept Labor - Certified Bldg Offical License 65.00 06/15/2018 101-42400-443700 6/6/2018 Monti Napa - Tri Power Belt for ARU #4 16.37 06/15/2018 226-45126-421990 6/6/2018 Gradys - Misc Hardware for Doors 3.42 06/15/2018 226-45126-422990 6/6/2018 Fleet Farm - Fan for Warehouse; Herbicide & Ri 186.87 06/15/2018 226-45126-422990 6/6/2018 Shell - Unleaded Fuel 18.270 Gallons @ $2.759 50.41 06/15/2018 226-45126-421200 6/6/2018 Holiday - Unleaded Fuel 10.223 gallons @ $2.8 29.64 06/15/2018 217-41990-421200 6/6/2018 Sherwin Williams - Paint, Tray, Brushes for Fitn 69.69 06/15/2018 226-45126-422990 6/6/2018 Target - Protein Bars, Granola, Bananas for Con( 87.83 06/15/2018 226-45125-425410 6/6/2018 Target - Socks 27.96 06/15/2018 226-45125-425411 6/6/2018 Gradys - Key for Ballfield Gates 2.59 06/15/2018 226-45126-421990 6/6/2018 Home Depot - Key Tags, Key Caps, Lanyards 12.30 06/15/2018 226-45126-421990 6/6/2018 Gradys - (2) fuel pump keys 2.80 06/15/2018 101-43127-421990 6/6/2018 Monti Napa - #234- Cor stop; wire stop 6.25 06/15/2018 101-43127-422110 6/6/2018 Monti Napa -hose end 10.62 06/15/2018 601-49440-422100 6/6/2018 Runnings -(3) 10 pk drip emitter- irrigation 14.97 06/15/2018 101-45201-421650 6/6/2018 Fastenal -(48) asst. batteries 15.67 06/15/2018 101-45201-421650 6/6/2018 Fastenal -(12) 17 oz. safety red spray 29.64 06/15/2018 101-43120-421510 6/6/2018 Runnings - (2) fender washer; (26) bulk bin prod 18.28 06/15/2018 101-45201-421650 6/6/2018 General Rental - Bertha Torch- 201b propane 19.00 06/15/2018 101-43127-421990 6/6/2018 Red's - fuel for small equipment 21.28 06/15/2018 101-45201-421200 6/6/2018 Runnings - pump- hvy duty barrel w/ lever 29.99 06/15/2018 101-43127-421990 6/6/2018 Gradys -(5) dowel ramin 30.95 06/15/2018 101-45201-421650 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/20/2018 - 3:39 PM) Page 4 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 6/6/2018 Marties' - (8) sharpen chain 32.00 06/15/2018 101-46102-421990 6/6/2018 Fastenal - drill bits for Bucket Truck 32.87 06/15/2018 101-43120-421990 6/6/2018 Auto Value - #226 - v -belt; u joint; (3) extension 35.94 06/15/2018 101-45201-422110 6/6/2018 Fastenal - 200 ear plugs 37.10 06/15/2018 101-43127-420650 6/6/2018 Monti Napa - (12) oil lift stations 37.80 06/15/2018 602-49490-421300 6/6/2018 Marties'-(2) Quick Pro 37.90 06/15/2018 101-43120-422500 6/6/2018 Runnings -battery Crafco Router 39.99 06/15/2018 101-43120-422100 6/6/2018 Monti Napa - #104; #110- (3) clamp; Z hose end 42.87 06/15/2018 101-43120-422100 6/6/2018 Monti Vacuum - roller bar; belt; etc- 1/2 Water 21.50 06/15/2018 601-49440-422100 6/6/2018 Monti Vacuum - roller bar; belt; etc- 1/2 Sewer 21.50 06/15/2018 602-49490-422100 6/6/2018 NBP - (2) cs suckers; (2) can liner; c-fld towel; l; 317.35 06/15/2018 609-49754-421990 6/6/2018 Cub - resale (35) limes; (10) lemons 44.55 06/15/2018 609-49750-425500 6/6/2018 Monti Napa - #226 - (3) air filters 46.47 06/15/2018 101-45201-421650 6/6/2018 Runnings (2) Auto Cut 25-2- whips 49.98 06/15/2018 101-45201-421650 6/6/2018 Nighthawk - June 2018 sec. monitor/cellular- Fii 49.95 06/15/2018 101-42200-431900 6/6/2018 Home Depot - (2) 10" flat free wheel 49.98 06/15/2018 101-45201-421650 6/6/2018 Home Depot - (3) 1/2 4x8 OSB 50.55 06/15/2018 101-45201-421650 6/6/2018 Runnings -fencing- 250' vinyl coat; (21) rope cli] 51.85 06/15/2018 101-45203-421990 6/6/2018 Runnings -(3) vise grip clamp 53.97 06/15/2018 101-43127-421990 6/6/2018 Office Depot - doz. highltr; doz. pens; wst.bskt; i 58.77 06/15/2018 101-43110-421990 6/6/2018 Runnings - (2) pruner; lopper; trowel; etc 59.91 06/15/2018 101-45201-421650 6/6/2018 General Rental - gas powered edger rental; (2) b] 65.00 06/15/2018 101-45203-421990 6/6/2018 Cub - resale (60) limes; (12) lemons 71.28 06/15/2018 609-49750-425500 6/6/2018 Cub - resale (60) limes; (12) lemons 71.28 06/15/2018 609-49750-425500 6/6/2018 Walmart - vacuum 74.09 06/15/2018 609-49754-421990 6/6/2018 Monti Napa - (20) repirator 74.80 06/15/2018 101-43127-420650 6/6/2018 Fastenal - Inv. stripe wand; (6) white rustol; etc- 74.99 06/15/2018 101-43120-421990 6/6/2018 Vonco II - asbesto disposal- Farm House 75.07 06/15/2018 602-49490-431990 6/6/2018 Marties' -Riverside- flower -1 flat; (10) accent 76.45 06/15/2018 651-49010-421990 6/6/2018 Farm Rite - Bobcat & Mower- seal kit; lip seal; 84.06 06/15/2018 101-43120-422100 6/6/2018 Runnings - irrig. sup. median flwrs- (2) 100' tubi 86.14 06/15/2018 101-45201-421650 6/6/2018 Runnings -boots reimbured B.C. 90.00 06/15/2018 602-49490-420650 6/6/2018 Marties' -grass seed 50 lb 90.00 06/15/2018 101-43120-422500 6/6/2018 Gradys - (4) padlocks; (12) keyblank 250pk 91.04 06/15/2018 101-43127-421990 6/6/2018 Home Depot - (2) foam expansion joint 45.94 06/15/2018 101-45201-421650 6/6/2018 Fastenal -Neptune MXU supplies- (400) cbl tie; 91.64 06/15/2018 601-49440-422701 6/6/2018 Monti Napa - (10) oil dry 96.74 06/15/2018 101-43127-421990 6/6/2018 Auto Value - #202 - battery for green mule 98.99 06/15/2018 101-45201-422100 6/6/2018 Cub - resale lemons/limes 100.95 06/15/2018 609-49750-425500 6/6/2018 Marties' - Quick Prl; peat moss; (6) manure 103.88 06/15/2018 101-45201-421600 6/6/2018 Marties' - 50# sunny grass 110.00 06/15/2018 101-45201-421650 6/6/2018 Monticello Block- ZPARKS_RWOODS- (20) 2( 111.20 06/15/2018 229-45202-453010 6/6/2018 Dyna - shop sup- (10) fuse; (150) washer; etc 113.23 06/15/2018 101-43127-421990 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/20/2018 - 3:39 PM) Page 5 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 6/6/2018 Fleet Farm - (10) nitrile glove; lift sling 117.77 06/15/2018 602-49490-421990 6/6/2018 Fastenal -(48) 17oz Red Rustol 118.56 06/15/2018 101-43160-421530 6/6/2018 Runnings - RV Blade Adapt; brkaway switch; wl 118.69 06/15/2018 101-45201-421650 6/6/2018 Cub - Wr. Co. Fire Ch£ Meet Host - meal suppli 119.40 06/15/2018 101-43120-421990 6/6/2018 Cabela's - 8" ledger 119.99 06/15/2018 101-43120-420650 6/6/2018 Midway Iron - ZPARKS-RWOODS- (5) rebar 126.19 06/15/2018 229-45202-453010 6/6/2018 G & K - inv. 6043259475; 53668 126.21 06/15/2018 609-49754-431990 6/6/2018 Runnings -Xcel Fence- 750" coated cable 133.50 06/15/2018 101-45203-421990 6/6/2018 Runnings -(6) flag kit; (2) cbl. tie; Hillman blk. t 137.91 06/15/2018 101-45201-421650 6/6/2018 H & L Mesabi - V -Plow 140.00 06/15/2018 101-43125-422460 6/6/2018 Ausco - (14) Safety T -Shirts - Parks 154.00 06/15/2018 101-45201-420650 6/6/2018 Fastenal -(4) XL Lime Rain Sets 199.96 06/15/2018 101-43120-420650 6/6/2018 NBP - calculator; cs 12oz. cups; (2) frames; etc 243.77 06/15/2018 609-49754-421990 6/6/2018 Dacotah Paper - (2) cs. can liner; (3) cs toilet tiss 231.72 06/15/2018 101-43120-421990 6/6/2018 Marties' -bx. B10 stakes; 25# Prem. sunny; (4) st 245.00 06/15/2018 101-43120-422500 6/6/2018 Applied Mntc- 12pk Red; 12pk blk gloss 246.17 06/15/2018 101-43127-421510 6/6/2018 Marties' -(2) Preen; (2) Lg. Peat Moss; (2) gypsu 247.28 06/15/2018 101-45201-421600 6/6/2018 Dyna - shop sup- (50) crmp/shrk conn; (50) cbl t 282.44 06/15/2018 101-43127-421990 6/6/2018 Marties'-(26) 23-0-15 284.70 06/15/2018 101-45201-421600 6/6/2018 DSG - Cedar planters- back flow rpr. tubing; tef. 359.64 06/15/2018 101-45201-421600 6/6/2018 Ausco - Walk/Roll T's -(50) future volunteer; (10 372.50 06/15/2018 101-45201-421650 6/6/2018 Ausco - (8) Safety T's- Streets 24.00 06/15/2018 101-43120-420650 6/6/2018 Stepp Mfg. - (2) Disk swivel head crack sealing 276.81 06/15/2018 101-43120-422100 6/6/2018 Arctic Glacier -resale-1957811309; 1957581200 351.13 06/15/2018 609-49750-425500 6/6/2018 Zarnoth - #108 - Elgin HD poly cablewrap broor 458.00 06/15/2018 101-43125-422100 6/6/2018 Marties' -(50) 40 lb. bags 23-0-15 fertilizer 507.50 06/15/2018 101-45201-421600 6/6/2018 Hotsy - valve rlf, open 3000wp; (3)v seal; (6) ck, 579.95 06/15/2018 101-43127-440100 6/6/2018 Aramark - May 2018 uniforms- Parks 168.45 06/15/2018 101-45201-441700 6/6/2018 Aramark - May 2018 uniforms- Sewer 95.99 06/15/2018 602-49490-441700 6/6/2018 Aramark - May 2018 uniforms- Water 95.99 06/15/2018 601-49440-441700 6/6/2018 Aramark - May 2018 uniforms- Streets 207.16 06/15/2018 101-43120-441700 6/6/2018 Aramark - May 2018 towels - Shop 23.63 06/15/2018 101-43127-421990 6/6/2018 Runnings -(13) Class B Uniform boots 845.00 06/15/2018 101-42200-421120 6/6/2018 Arctic Glacier -resale-1957812709; 1954813407 886.71 06/15/2018 609-49750-425500 6/6/2018 Allina Health- Qtr bill- to keep medicals up to d, 1,232.09 06/15/2018 101-42200-431990 6/6/2018 Titan - #104 - brake 1,238.89 06/15/2018 101-43120-422100 6/6/2018 TRS - Total Care Keystroke- annual renwl; soft -o 1,485.56 06/15/2018 609-49754-431900 6/6/2018 Central Wood- (100) 2203 Rec- Step Plygmd 1,614.95 06/15/2018 101-45201-422500 6/6/2018 Site One -(24) 6500 Full Circle; (25) pop up rotor 2,017.20 06/15/2018 101-45201-421650 6/6/2018 Runnings - heat lance handle 6.99 06/15/2018 101-43120-421990 6/6/2018 Gradys - galy. coupling; galv. nipple 8.18 06/15/2018 101-45201-421650 6/6/2018 Runnings -(2) 50' blank tubing- planters on Ceda 9.98 06/15/2018 101-45201-421650 6/6/2018 Red's 4234 fuel for spray rig 12.78 06/15/2018 101-45201-421200 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/20/2018 - 3:39 PM) Page 6 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 6/6/2018 Home Depot - (3) 50' drip irrig. tubing 12.81 06/15/2018 101-45201-421650 6/6/2018 Monti Napa - oil fltr; fuel fltr 21.82 06/15/2018 601-49440-422110 6/6/2018 Home Depot -4'x 50' barrier fence 27.73 06/15/2018 101-45201-421650 6/6/2018 Runnings - valve ball 29.99 06/15/2018 101-45201-421650 6/6/2018 NBP - doz. legal pads 35.84 06/15/2018 609-49754-421990 6/6/2018 Monti Napa -(3) napa oil 50.91 06/15/2018 602-49490-422110 6/6/2018 DISH - 6/2-7/1/2018 71.64 06/15/2018 609-49754-432500 6/6/2018 Office Depot - (36) AAA batteries; 12pk 9v; 48p 82.42 06/15/2018 101-43110-421990 6/6/2018 Active911 - Renew subscription for active 911 p] 470.00 06/15/2018 101-42200-443300 6/6/2018 Runnings -(11) Class B uniform boots 715.00 06/15/2018 101-42200-421120 6/6/2018 WHCE - Sunset Ponds Lift Sation- (970) kWh 133.35 06/15/2018 602-49490-438100 6/6/2018 WHCE - 1645 & 1675 CR 39 37.77 06/15/2018 602-49490-438100 6/6/2018 WHCE - DMV 19.95 06/15/2018 217-41990-431900 6/6/2018 WHCE - 2171 W River St - Parks - Parks 36.45 06/15/2018 101-45201-431900 6/6/2018 WHCE - 5980 Jason Ave - Water 19.95 06/15/2018 601-49440-431900 6/6/2018 WHCE - MCC 27.95 06/15/2018 226-45126-431900 6/6/2018 WHCE - 207 Chelsea Rd. - Water 32.95 06/15/2018 601-49440-431900 6/6/2018 WHCE - 209 Cedar- Water 29.95 06/15/2018 601-49440-431990 6/6/2018 WHCE - 132 E Broadway - Water 29.95 06/15/2018 601-49440-431990 6/6/2018 WHCE -107 River St. W 19.95 06/15/2018 101-45201-431990 6/6/2018 WHCE - Hi -Way Liquor June 2018 21.42 06/15/2018 609-49754-431990 6/6/2018 WHCE - MCC - June 2018 19.95 06/15/2018 226-45126-431990 6/6/2018 WHCE - 200 Dundas - Water June 2018 29.95 06/15/2018 601-49440-431990 6/6/2018 WHCE -909 Golf Crs. Rd - June 2018 19.95 06/15/2018 101-43110-431990 6/6/2018 WHCE -General Street Lighting 1,326.43 06/15/2018 101-43160-438100 6/6/2018 Marties - City Wide planters- Adopt a Park 8 inv 4,999.75 06/15/2018 101-45201-440900 6/6/2018 Bailey Nurseries- resale trees; storm repr; (20) 0 9,841.10 06/15/2018 101-45201-422500 6/6/2018 Rapid Marine - Crestliner Rescue Boat; Mercury 1,500.00 06/15/2018 101-42200-458010 6/6/2018 TRS - (12) 60OPK LABELS v- SHELF; (6) 250( 284.13 06/15/2018 609-49754-421990 6/6/2018 Holiday - Unleaded Fuel 1.095 gallons @ $2.76 3.02 06/15/2018 226-45126-421200 6/6/2018 Facebook - Advertising for Music on the Mississ 25.00 06/15/2018 101-45204-434990 6/6/2018 Marties - Softner Salt (63 bags) 371.70 06/15/2018 226-45126-422990 6/6/2018 Gotprint.com - Signs for Montiview Park (4) 88.19 06/15/2018 101-45201-421650 6/6/2018 Cub - Beverages for Band 8.49 06/15/2018 101-45204-421990 6/6/2018 Monti Printing - Name Plate Holder & Name Pla 82.75 06/15/2018 101-41310-421990 6/6/2018 Monti Napa - Belts (20) 345.46 06/15/2018 226-45126-422990 6/6/2018 Holiday - Unleaded Fuel 8.375 gallons @ $2.8( 25.18 06/15/2018 217-41990-421200 6/6/2018 Monti Printing - Additional Newsletters (100) 43.50 06/15/2018 101-41310-431950 6/6/2018 Monti Printing - Art Peeps Flyer (2300) 345.00 06/15/2018 101-45204-431990 6/6/2018 Sams Club - FI - Food, Plates, Cups, Sunscreen 295.18 06/15/2018 226-45127-421981 6/6/2018 Primo Pizza - Food for F.I. Open House 38.00 06/15/2018 226-45127-421981 6/6/2018 Monti Printing - Observation Notice Forms (2,0( 336.00 06/15/2018 101-42400-421990 6/6/2018 Gradys - RoundUp for Weeds around Building 22.99 06/15/2018 226-45126-422990 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/20/2018 - 3:39 PM) Page 7 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 6/6/2018 Target - Food for EDA Meeting 6/4/18 52.98 06/15/2018 213-46301-443990 6/6/2018 USPS - Certified Mail 7.41 06/15/2018 101-41910-432200 6/6/2018 Walmart - Supplies for F.I. 72.24 06/15/2018 226-45127-421981 6/6/2018 Home Depot - 2 Gal Sprayer for Weed Killer; Rc 39.94 06/15/2018 226-45126-422990 6/6/2018 Banners.com - Banner Contest Sign & Stand 184.95 06/15/2018 101-41940-443990 6/6/2018 NBP - Pens, Paper 38.49 06/15/2018 217-41990-421990 6/6/2018 Trusted Employees - May Background Checks ( 92.00 06/15/2018 226-45122-431990 6/6/2018 Trusted Employees - May Background Checks ( 92.00 06/15/2018 609-49754-431990 6/6/2018 Trusted Employees - May Background Checks ( 28.50 06/15/2018 601-49440-431990 6/6/2018 Trusted Employees - May Background Checks ( 28.50 06/15/2018 602-49490-431990 6/6/2018 Trusted Employees - May Background Checks (: 74.00 06/15/2018 101-43120-431990 6/6/2018 NPELR - MPELRA 2018 Summer Conference (' 250.00 06/15/2018 101-41800-433100 6/6/2018 Von Hanson Snacks - Flavored Pretzels for Conc 43.16 06/15/2018 226-45125-425410 6/6/2018 Ninety Four Services - Passenger Van for City Tc 115.00 06/15/2018 101-45201-443990 6/6/2018 Constant Contact - Monthly Email Service 65.00 06/15/2018 226-45122-430900 6/6/2018 Amazon - Printer (Replacement for Prairie Centc 189.99 06/15/2018 226-45122-421990 6/6/2018 Managed Design/US Cad - Bluebeam Revu 19 S 678.62 06/15/2018 101-43111-430910 6/6/2018 Wall Street Journal - Monthly Subscription (WO 38.99 06/15/2018 101-41520-443300 6/6/2018 Amazon - Light Blocking Screen Protector (2) 113.90 06/15/2018 101-41310-421990 6/6/2018 Amazon - Pens 20.80 06/15/2018 226-45122-421990 6/6/2018 Amazon - Yoga Bolster (5) 189.95 06/15/2018 226-45127-421720 6/6/2018 Amazon - Whistles w/Lanyards for F.I. Staff 35.96 06/15/2018 226-45127-421110 6/6/2018 Target - Food for Retirement Open House (MT) 61.84 06/15/2018 101-41800-443990 6/6/2018 Cub - Flowers/Decorations for Retirement Open 13.95 06/15/2018 101-41800-443990 6/6/2018 Primo Pizza - Food for F.I. Open House 56.00 06/15/2018 226-45127-421981 6/6/2018 Adobe - Sales Tax Refund on Adobe Software Pi -44.24 06/15/2018 101-41940-443990 6/6/2018 Monti Chamber - March Chamber Lunches Apri 30.00 06/15/2018 213-46301-443990 6/6/2018 Monti Chamber - March Chamber Lunches Apri 15.00 06/15/2018 226-45122-433100 6/6/2018 Monti Chamber - March Chamber Lunches Apri 15.00 06/15/2018 101-41310-443990 6/6/2018 NBP - Mailing Labels 23.29 06/15/2018 217-41990-421990 6/6/2018 J P Cooke - Green Ink Refill 12.70 06/15/2018 217-41990-421990 6/6/2018 Amazon - Labels 23.19 06/15/2018 226-45122-421990 6/6/2018 Amazon - Books for F.I. 23.10 06/15/2018 226-45127-421981 6/6/2018 Amazon- Chair Mat, Surge Protector, Letter Tra] 139.40 06/15/2018 101-41310-421990 6/6/2018 NBP - Paper 67.00 06/15/2018 217-41990-421990 6/6/2018 NBP - Tape, Paper, Mouse Pad, Thermal Pouche 168.71 06/15/2018 101-41310-421990 6/6/2018 Gotprint.com - Yards Signs for Music on the Mis 161.91 06/15/2018 101-45204-434990 6/6/2018 Facebook - Advertising for Music on the Mississ 34.87 06/15/2018 101-45204-434990 6/6/2018 Econ Devel Assoc - 2018 Summer Conference (J 305.00 06/15/2018 213-46301-433100 6/6/2018 Diamond Mowers- #179- HD Flail Knife; jam m 420.58 06/15/2018 101-43120-422100 6/6/2018 Monticello Block -ZPARKS-RWOODS return (1 -55.60 06/15/2018 229-45202-453010 6/6/2018 Fire Safety - (2) Jafline HD, fire hose 420.00 06/15/2018 101-43120-421990 6/6/2018 Parkwhiz, Inc.- (2) fraud- credit next month- cari 40.00 06/15/2018 101-00000-115030 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/20/2018 - 3:39 PM) Page 8 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number 6/6/2018 Dyna - (200) asst. cable blk. ties; (20) cap screw 204.26 06/15/2018 101-45201-421650 6/6/2018 Monti Napa - fuel fltr; oil fltr 22.22 06/15/2018 602-49490-422110 6/6/2018 Gradys -asst. screws; nuts; etc 9.99 06/15/2018 101-43127-421990 6/6/2018 US Bank - Quarterly Rebate -3,544.82 06/15/2018 101-00000-362970 Check Total: 107,257.42 Vendor: 2438 VANCO SERVICES LLC Check Sequence: 6 00008925052 Vanco - Gateway Exchange - May 2018 15.05 06/15/2018 656-00000-202099 00008925052 Vanco - Gateway Exchange - May 2018 54.24 06/15/2018 601-49440-443980 00008925052 Vanco - Gateway Exchange - May 2018 54.23 06/15/2018 602-49490-443980 Check Total: 123.52 Total for Check Run: 403,251.81 Total of Number of Checks: 6 The preceding list of bills payables was reviewed and approved for payment. Date: 6/25/18 Approved by: ❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑ Mayor Brian Stumpf Reference ACH Enabled: True AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/20/2018 - 3:39 PM) Page 9 City Council Agenda 6/25/2018 2B. Consideration of approving new hires and departures for Citv departments (TE) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The Council is asked to ratify the hiring and departures of employees that have occurred recently in the departments listed. It is recommended that the Council officially ratify the hiring/departure of all listed employees including part-time and seasonal workers. By ratifying departures, the council also approves the expenditure for final amounts due to terminated and otherwise departing employees. Al. Budget Impact: (positions are generally included in budget) A2. Staff Work Load Impact: If new positions, there may be some training involved. If terminated positions, existing staff would pick up those hours, as needed, until replaced. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: I . Motion to ratify the hire/departures of the employees as identified on the attached list. 2. Motion to deny the recommended hires and departures. C. RECOMMENDATION: By statute the City Council has the authority to approve all hires/departures. City staff recommends Alternative #l, for the Council to approve the hires and/or departures as listed. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • List of new/terminated employees NE EMPLOYEES Name Title Department Hire Date Class Eric Green Clerk Liquor Store 6/15/2018 PT Ron Hackenmuellerl I Chief Building Official Building 6/26/2018 FT TERMINATING EMPLOYEES Name Reason Department Last Day Class Wendy Schmidt Voluntary MCC 5/12/18 PT Phillip Hurt Voluntary Parks 6/1/18 Seasonal Paige Draack Voluntary MCC 6/3/18 PT Megan Gratrix Voluntary MCC 6/4/18 PT Tromotion New Hire and Terms City Council 2018.xlsx: 6/20/2018 City Council Agenda 6/25/2018 2C. Consideration of avnroving the sale or disposal of surplus Citv property (WO) There is no report this City Council cycle. City Council Agenda: 6/25/2018 2D. Consideration of approving Resolution 2018-48 accepting donations from Corev and Rachel Peters of $400 for mirrors at the Prairie Center Building and from Donna Dunkerson of $352.20 for flowers for East Bridge Park gardens (JS) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The Council is being asked to approve the donation/sponsorship of $400 for mirrors at the Prairie Center Building from Corey and Rachel Peters and a donation of $352.20 for flowers in the East Bridge Park gardens from Donna Dunkerson. As required by state statute, if the City accepts the donation of funds, the City Council needs to adopt a resolution specifying the amount of the donation and its use. Al. Budget Impact: The donation/sponsorship will pay mirrors at the Prairie Center Building for yoga classes and for flowers in East Bridge Park garden. A2. Staff Workload Impact: NA. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the contribution and authorize use of funds as specified. 2. Motion to not approve the contribution and return the funds to the donors. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommendation is to adopt the resolution accepting the contributions. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • Resolution 2018-48 City of Monticello RESOLUTION NO. 2018-48 RESOLUTION APPROVING CONTRIBUTIONS WHEREAS, the City of Monticello is generally authorized to accept contributions of real and personal property pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Sections 465.03 and 465.04 for the benefit of its citizens and is specifically authorized to maintain such property for the benefit of its citizens in accordance with the terms prescribed by the donor. Said gifts may be limited under provisions of MN Statutes Section 471.895. WHEREAS, the following persons and or entities have offered to contribute contributions or gifts to the City as listed: DONOR/ENTITY Corey and Rachel Peters Donna Dunkerson DESCRIPTION VALUE Cash $400 Cash $352.20 WHEREAS, all said contributions are intended to aid the City in establishing facilities, operations or programs within the city's jurisdiction either alone or in cooperation with others, as allowed by law; and WHEREAS, the City Council hereby finds that it is appropriate to accept the contributions offered. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Monticello as follows: 1. The contributions described above are hereby accepted by the City of Monticello. 2. The contributions described above will be used as designated by the donor. This may entail reimbursing or allocating the money to another entity that will utilize the funds for the following stated purpose: DONOR/ENTITY Corey and Rachel Peters Donna Dunkerson PURPOSE/AMOUNT $400/Mirrors — Prairie Center $352.20/Flowers Adopted by the City Council of Monticello this 25th day of June, 2018. Brian Stumpf, Mayor ATTEST: Jennifer Schreiber, City Clerk Council Agenda: 06/25/2018 2E. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2018-49 establishing an Absentee Ballot Board for the 2018 Elections (JS) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Minnesota State Statue 203B.121 requires the City to establish an Absentee Ballot Board by resolution, if they are conducting absentee voting in the municipality. The main function of the Absentee Ballot Board is to process and accept or reject absentee ballots. This is handled by City Staff (trained as election judges) and appointed election judges and must be completed according to election rules. The absentee ballot voting period runs for 46 days prior to Election Day for both the primary and general elections. Absentee voting for the Primary runs from June 29 to August 13, and for the General election from September 21 to November 5. The City Clerk has been designated to serve as administrator of the absentee voting process under the direction of Wright County Auditor's Office. Al. Budget Impact: Personnel costs incorporated into the 2018 budget. A2. Staff Impact: The absentee voting process will involve the City Clerk and five City Hall employees. All other assistance is provided by city residents that serve as election judges. Appointment of election judges is covered in a separate agenda item. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to adopt Resolution 2018-49 establishing an Absentee Ballot Board for the 2018 elections. 2. Motion of other. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative #1. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • Resolution 2018-49 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2018-49 ESTABLISHING AN ABSENTEE BALLOT BOARD FOR THE 2018 ELECTIONS WHEREAS, Minnesota State Statutes Chapter 203B.121 provides authority to a municipality to establish an Absentee Ballot Board in accordance with the provisions of the law; and WHEREAS, an Absentee Ballot Board will allow election judges to perform the task of administering absentee voting as described in Minnesota Election Laws, starting 46 days prior to the Primary and General elections; and WHEREAS, the City will have the necessary equipment, training and other resources in place to administer absentee voting as prescribed by the Minnesota Secretary of State's office; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOL VED BY THE MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL, that an Absentee Ballot Board be established for the purpose of administering the absentee voting process, as provided for by law. ADOPTED BY the Monticello City Council this 25th day of June, 2018. CITY OF MONTICELLO Brian Stumpf, Mayor ATTEST: Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator CERTIFICATION STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF WRIGHT I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of Resolution 2016-49 duly passed, adopted and approved by the Monticello City Council at their scheduled meeting on June 25, 2018, and recorded in minutes of said meeting. Notary Public: Date: (STAT Jennifer Schreiber, City Clerk City Council Agenda: 06/25/2018 2F. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2018-50 appointing election iudges to serve for the 2018 elections, including iudges for the Absentee Ballot Board and Health Care Facilitv voting (JS) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Minnesota Statutes Chapter 204B.21 requires cities to appoint election judges to serve at primary and general elections and on the Absentee Ballot Board. A Head Election judge should also be designated as part of the appointment. The appointment of these judges is contingent upon them completing the necessary training, which is required every two years with training sessions taking place in June and July. We are pleased to report that we have about 40 people that indicated an interest in being an election judge and have completed an application. This list includes people that signed up at caucuses and were provided to us from the County. We request that Council approve all of the names on the list to serve as election judges for 2018. We also ask that Roseanne Duran be appointed as Head Election Judge for the 2018 elections. We anticipate needing additional judges for the General election and are recruiting other candidates to serve as election judges, which will be presented for approval at a later date. Several members of city staff will again be assisting with the absentee voting process and are also trained as election judges. With the change in the absentee voting process, which no longer requires a reason for voting prior to Election Day, we anticipate a greater number of voters that opt to vote absentee. We are working on processes to make this as efficient as possible. When an absentee ballot application is received, city staff would be responsible for entering the information into the electronic State Voter Registration System (SVRS), printing off labels, and assembling a ballot packet. City staff also receives the completed ballot packets when they are returned, which are then turned over to the Absentee Ballot Board for approval or rejection, as required by election law. The recommended Absentee Ballot Board judges are highlighted on the list of judges. Additionally, unregistered voters are able to register electronically through the Secretary of State's website. We will be making this available on our public computer at city hall for residents that walk in and wish to register to vote. They can also pick up a paper voter registration form at city hall. Al. Budget Impact: Election judge compensation is included in the 2018 budget. A2. Staff Workload Impact: The City Clerk and Administrative Assistant will be involved with elections to a greater degree than other staff. As it gets closer to the Primary and General Election days, it is anticipated that more time will be spent on elections, including some overtime. It should be noted that State Election Laws mandate certain hours for absentee and regular voting, some of which fall outside of regular city work hours. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to adopt Resolution 2018-50 appointing the 2018 election judges as recommended. City Council Agenda: 06/25/2018 2. Motion of other. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends Alternative #1. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Draft Resolution B. Judge List CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2018-50 RESOLUTION ADOPTING ELECTION JUDGES AND APPOINTING ABSENTEE BALLOT BOARD JUDGES FOR THE AUGUST 14, 2018 PRIMARY ELECTION WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Monticello is required by MS 20413.2 1, Sec. 2, to officially approve the appointment of election judges and absentee ballot board members; and WHEREAS, the Monticello City Council hereby adopts the judges listed on the attached Exhibit A, hereto attached, as the official judges for the August 14, 2018 Primary Election with the understanding that amendments may be necessary to the appointments in order to fill vacancies and meet party requirements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of Monticello that the names listed on Exhibit A, hereto attached, are the official Election Judges and that the names on Exhibit A that are highlighted are the official Absentee Ballot Board members for the City of Monticello for the August 14, 2018 Primary Election. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO ON THIS 25TH DAY OF JUNE, 2018. CITY OF MONTICELLO Brian Stumpf, Mayor ATTEST: Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator ELECTION JUDGES - 2018 as of June 21, 2018 (Absentee Board highlighted) name I address I Role Cindy Anderson Monticello Judge Fred Anderson Monticello Judge Marge Arndt Monticello Judge Gladys Bitzer Monticello Judge Anna Bohanon Monticello Judge Duane Carlson Monticello Lead Judge Winfred Causby Monticello Lead Judge Agnes DeMarais Monticello Judge Janet Doucette Monticello Judge Roseanne Duran Monticello Head Judge Tracy Ergen I (Staff/Judge Keri Erickson Monticello Judge Dorothy Fridgen Monticello Judge Mark Gilberts Monticello Judge Matt Griswold Monticello Judge Rachel Griswold Monticello Judge Beth Green (Staff/Judge Renee Hitter Monticello Lead Judge Bill Hoffarth Monticello Judge Darla Hoskins Monticello Judge (Alternate) Lois Holtberg Monticello Judge Vicki Leerhoff I (Staff/Judge Rachel Leonard Staff/Judge Judy Moody Monticello Judge Ruth Morgan Monticello Judge MerriJo Moyer Monticello Judge Frank Opay Monticello Judge Diane Peters Monticello Judge Sarah Rathlisberger I (Staff/Judge James Sanborn Monticello Judge Michael Schmidt Monticello Judge Merrlyn Seefeldt Monticello Judge William Seefeldt Monticello Judge Jennifer Schreiber I (Staff/Judge Cathy Shuman Monticello Judge Shari Snyder Big Lake Judge Darlene Solberg Monticello Judge Patricia Sonju Thielman Monticello Judge Jacob Thunanderg IMonticello tafff/Judge kudge Theresa Willenbrin City Council Agenda: 06/25/2018 2G. Consideration of approving a Special Event Permit allowing use of Ellison Park and related assistance in coniunction with Art in the Park/Taste of Monticello on Saturday. Julv 14, 2018. Applicant: Monticello Chamber of Commerce (JS/PW) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The City Council is asked to consider approval of the use of Ellison Park, as well as related City assistance for park set-up, for the Art in the Park and the Taste of Monticello event. The event is coordinated by the Monticello Chamber of Commerce and is proposed to occur on Saturday, July 14, 2018. The event hours are 8 a.m. — 3 p.m., however, the Chamber of Commerce is requesting use of the park beginning at 5:00 a.m. Although the narrative does not request tear -down time after 3:00 p.m., that time is customarily accounted for as part of event approval, therefore, the event approval would allow use of the park for this event from 5:00 a.m. — 5 p.m. The Chamber noted that some vendors choose to set up the night before, however, this is at their own risk. The Chamber has indicated that it will be responsible for set-up and tear -down related to the event, and will provide required portable satellites and waste disposal services. They cover a portion of the cost of those facilities for this event, although they will already be in place as part of the Riverfest event. The Sheriff's Office has reviewed this application and is working with the Chamber and any law enforcement concerns that may arise in the park. Parking and the additional traffic in town will be handled with the on -duty Monticello deputies. The Chamber will also coordinate with the Sheriff's Department for traffic control and security purposes. City Public Works staff have previously been involved with assisting in park preparation. The request is to allow such assistance, along with waiver of park rental fee to continue for 2018. Al. Budget Impact: There is the potential for a minor loss of revenue for park rental for the date Art in the Park/Taste of Monticello occurs at Ellison. No other budget impact is anticipated. A2. Staff Workload Impact: The Parks Department staff will assist during the week prior to the event preparing for this activity, in addition to other Riverfest activities planned for Ellison Park. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the Special Event Permit allowing use of Ellison Park and related assistance in conjunction with the Art in the Park/Taste of the Town celebration on July 14, 2017. 2. Motion to deny the Special Event Permit. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff supports Alternative #1 in favor of the Special Event permit for Art in the Park/Taste of Monticello. City Council Agenda: 06/25/2018 D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Art in the Park/Taste of Monticello Narrative B. Art in the Park/Taste of Monticello Maps C. Certificate of Liability Insurance CITY O F CITY OF MONTICELLO s Community Development 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1 Special Event Permit MonticeR0 Monticello, MN 55362(763) 295-2711 . infoaci.monticello.mn.us Application Checklist PROPERTY INFORMATION Property Address %1\ R IVP, ' d17 t P&O w -t; P,pJA31n'L- Property Legal Description �`\�,ShV� Pbku`\k Property ID Number PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION Owner Name 0� W)"ttAo f Owner Address FjdFj UJB\r•u �} s}� �1AA�rt�1iCP.�,�? OwnerPhonePhone 11o3'2g5 211 Owner Email lh-� �,� . vv oW\ C UID .1MV\ .1%s APPLICANT INFORMATION Applicant Name Nvw4�� \ T "&m ��ny, Applicant Address k VL IM to;wpwwtbQayl 53 -.'- Applicant Phone 11U '3_ 2(>5 -til o 0 Applicant Email I kr4D ® u\k.r1VCVc,C4 o1,. i • tbInn J Name of Event (n kTk kv� Irv+ VIP 1,V , I -rnx�f ) l'W 1°` 0Al o 'J\N�ttAv Location/Address of Event \\ (��v Q,v �� , Dates & Times of Event I�j�� I ��y \y �'Lp�� ,I E�� nn I Complete Application Required The review and consideration of an application submitted shall only occur if such application includes all items that are required in support of the application and is deemed complete by the City Clerk's Office. Application Submission Schedule Application, required information, and payment must be submitted no later than 30 working days prior to desired approval date. Application Information Applicants shall note that in addition to a special event permits, any liquor license or permit, sign permits and building permits for tents may also be required and are not included within the special event permit application and approval. Any requested use of City facilities, City staff resources, City equipment, and/or City property (including rights of way) and/or any requested waiver of application fee or park rental fees requires review and approval by the City Council. In addition, events which occur after 10 PM may requires review and approval by the City Council as related to noise ordinances. Please provide clear information in the application regarding these requests. 07/25/16 Prapefrtj Owner's Stptement I am the fee title owner of the described property and I agree to this application. I certify that I am in compliance with all ordinance requirements and conditions regarding other City approval that have been previously granted. (Signature) (Date) Applicant's Statement This application shall be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding the application. I have completed all of the applicable filing requirements and I hereby acknowledge that I have read and fully understand the applicable provisions of the City Ordinances and current policies related to this application and that the documents and information I have submitted are true and correct. (Signature) q UOI L&DAM CITY APPROVAL (City Clerk Signature) (Community Development Director Signature) Special Event Permit Approval is granted with the following conditions: internal review checklist (as applicable): Public Works Routing Law Enforcement Notification Building Department Monticello Community Center Room/Park Reservations Post -Approval Routing/Requirements Applicant Public Works Law Enforcement Notification City Clerk Monticello Community Center Room/Park Reservations Liability Insurance Certificate Received Surrounding Property Owner Notification Complete (Date) �t' J'A— �Q) (Date) (Date) Approved ❑ Denied ❑ Admin I Parks Streets Director 07/25/16 4 a � E a E ror M CA c WASHING®N AVE. IN OR Ln m N 1-4 Lo UJ r -i It I00 �I cn I 0 N m N j� r N 00 N m m r� I r'4 m r14 m LLn N m I cry m l M M N M L(� r4 N M C O rlj N N 00 01 ICT Ln rn co 1�t Ln o Ln Ln L, `° Ln Ln N tf) Ln Ln M Irr In l(') 1. z U d � Q a v� Z Oji D r vo 0 0 J = Z N ® Vf Ql 0a W z H G O' -Knot, O r, OV w o z —LL Q Lw> W 0U_.i C 0 OLL / d W d � `92 a �d N Oji N_ 0 Z 0 Q J V) z V) II C Special Event Permit -2018 Art in the Park/Taste of Monticello Saturday, July 14, 2018, 8:00 am -3:00 pm Description of event -This event has been in existence for 26 years. It takes place on the banks of the Mississippi River in Ellison Park from 8AM-3PM. Although it is not part of Riverfest, it does run at the same time as our community festival. Chamber staff/volunteers will mark the grass in the park with spray paint the day before the event. Some vendors choose to set up the night before however, it is at their own risk. Wright County Sheriff department is aware that there could be some vendors set up early. Most vendors begin to set up on Saturday at SAM. Vendors bring tents and product to the park. Restaurants and local entertainment require electricity. Wes Olson Electric assists with electrical set up and ensures everything works properly. Wright County Sheriff are onsite during the entire event. No alterations are made to the City Park for this event. Monticello Chamber carries appropriate insurance coverage. To my knowledge, there has not been an adverse effect from hosting Art in the Park/Taste of Monticello in the past. The Monticello Chamber pays a portion of portable toilet expense and waste disposal to Riverfest for using facilities already in place in the park for this event. Chamber staff alerts the Sheriff's department of our event when vendors set up early and this typically encourages more patrols during the evening before the event. Riverfest serves beer out of the Lion's Den during the event. They also hold the bean bag tournament on the East end of the park. The Lion's hold the liquor license and insurance liability for this part of the day. OP ID: MS CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE I DA06/07/2018Y) 06/07/2018 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). PRODUCER CONTACT Foster White Agency, Inc. NAME: Jake Olinger 114 West 3rd Street c ICONo. Ext,. 763-295-2614 ((A/C. No): 763-295-3010 Monticello, MN 55362 Jake Olinger aDORless:lolinger@foster-white.com PRODUCER MONTI-4 CUSTOMER ID #: DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS I VEHICLES (Attach ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, if more space is required) City of Monticello is named as an Additional Insured in respect to General Liability. RE: Art in the Park/Taste of of Monticello and Party in the Park CERTIFICATE HOLDER CITYMON City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street Monticello, MN 55362 CANCELLATION SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE Jake Olinger © 1988-2009 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. ACORD 25 (2009/09) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC # INSURED Monticello Chamber of Commerce INSURER A : West Bend Mutual Insurance Co 15350 PO Box 192 Monticello, MN 55362 I INSURER B : INSURER C INSURER D : INSURER E: INSURER F : COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: REVISION NUMBER: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. INSR TYPE OF INSURANCE DDL SUBR LTR INSR V.POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFF POLICY EXP LIMITS (MM/DD/YYYY) (MM/DD/YYYY) GENERAL LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE $ 1,000,000 A X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY Y NSO 1078042 04/20/2018 04/20/2019 DAMAGE TO RENTED PREMISES (Ea occurrence) $ 100 000 CLAIMS -MADE 1XI OCCUR MED EXP (Any one person) $ 5,000 PERSONAL & ADV INJURY $ 1,000,000 GENERAL AGGREGATE $ 2,000,000 GGEEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG $ 2,000,000 Jl I POLICY n PRO- n LOC $ AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT $ 1,000,000 (Ea accident) ANY AUTO BODILY INJURY (Per person) $ ALL OWNED AUTOS BODILY INJURY (Per accident) $ SCHEDULED AUTOS PROPERTY DAMAGE $ A X HIRED AUTOS NSO 1078042 04/20/2018 04/20/2019 (PER ACCIDENT) A X NON-OWNEDAUTOS NSO 1078042 04/20/2018 04/20/20191 $ $ X UMBRELLA LAB OCCUR EACH OCCURRENCE $ 1,000,000 EXCESS LAB HI CLAIMS -MADE AGGREGATE $ 1,000,000 A NUO 2097834 04/20/2018 04/20/2019 DEDUCTIBLE $ X RETENTION $ 10,000 $ WORKERS COMPENSATION WC STATU- I O AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY YIN TORY LIMITS FR F--1 ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE E.L. EACH ACCIDENT $ OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? NIA (Mandatory in NH) E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE $ If yes, describe under DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT $ A D & O Liability NNO 1088832 04/20/2018 04/20/2019 Aggregate 1,000,000 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS I VEHICLES (Attach ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, if more space is required) City of Monticello is named as an Additional Insured in respect to General Liability. RE: Art in the Park/Taste of of Monticello and Party in the Park CERTIFICATE HOLDER CITYMON City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street Monticello, MN 55362 CANCELLATION SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE Jake Olinger © 1988-2009 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. ACORD 25 (2009/09) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD City Council Agenda: 06/25/2018 211. Consideration to approve a Special Event Permit allowing use of West Bridge Park, city streets and related assistance for the Partv in the Park on July 11, 2018. Applicant: Monticello Chamber (JS/PW/AS) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The City Council is asked to consider approval of a special event permit for Party in the Park. Party in the Park replaces the Chamber's annual Downtown Block Party and is occurring on Wednesday, July 11, 2018. Council approval is requested for use of West Bridge Park for the event. As part of the approval, the City Council is asked to consider the closure of River Street from the corner of Hwy 25 to the corner of Walnut Street. The applicant has requested that the street be closed between 7 a.m. and 10 p.m. to accommodate volunteer set-up and take-down before and after the event. The event itself will occur 4:30 — 9 p.m. In specific, the application lists the following requested City assistance: • Close River Street — Hwy 25 to Walnut (7 a.m. — 10 p.m. on July 11) • "No parking" signs posted at West Bridge Park parking spaces (7 a.m. on July 11) • Street barricades ( 7 a.m. on July 11) - Walnut Street at River Street - River Street at Hwy 25 - Entrance/Exit to City parking lot • Pedestrian crosswalk markers (7 a.m. July 11) • Trash receptacles, picnic tables, traffic cones (July 11) • Approval of the use of city parking lots in the downtown area including Cedar Street garden center (July 11) The Chamber has also requested permission to place a sign in front of the water treatment plant on East Broadway and a sign at West Bridge Park advertising the event. City staff will be working with the Chamber of Commerce to mark the pedestrian routes into the event from the Walnut Street parking lot. Staff will also be requesting a right-of- way permit from Wright County for installation of the temporary curb extension feature at Walnut and Broadway. City staff plans on attending the event in the non-profit display area for public engagement activities as related to the Walnut Corridor planning effort. The Sheriff's Office has been in contact with the Chamber and will assist with any law enforcement concerns that may arise during the block party. Al. Budget Impact: None. A2. Staff Workload Impact: Staff impacts are as noted above and include drop-off and pickup of barricades, placement of "No Parking" signage, picnic tables and trash/recycling receptacles. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the Special Event Permit allowing use of West Bridge Park and temporary closing of River Street from 7 a.m. until 10 p.m. on Wednesday, July 11, 2018, including the use of public parking facilities, staff resources and amenities as described in the Special Event Permit application, contingent on: City Council Agenda: 06/25/2018 a. Continued site coordination with Streets Superintendent and Parks Superintendent. b. Verification of notification of adjacent property owners by permit holder. 2. Motion to deny the Special Event Permit. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends Alternative #1 above. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Party in the Park Application B. Party in the Park Site Plan/Map C. Certificate of Liability Coverage CITYo F CITY OF MONTICELLO Community Development �-+505 WalnutStreet,suite 1 Special Event Permit Montido�1,,Monticello, MN 55362 (763) 295-2711 . info(iDci.monticello.mmus Application Checklist PROPERTY INFORMATION' Property Address�o-11N D#� , X o��. Property Legal Description Property ID Number �] PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION Owner Name C1�y �1110►I�`!�cr.11o Owner Address SOS • Wa V\kW S -k, NUv6 baa_ () 5 Owner Phone 11Q3' ?J� S- 7-Ikl Owner Email iy�-Fp l4) C;1. W&OKAitj' 10 • "v\ • 11 5 APPUCANT INFORMATION Applicant Name Applicant Address C, QU"Ar 0 ,, r D . Pn le�nY�),.. Applicant Phone2,ft- Applicant Email 1 Di 1 I OC,C,I yv� n Wu�ln-I-i . 1N1 Name of Event to n -P Location/Address of Event '� Dates & Times of Event VII�,� `1L�V1` �1� -� V, �5Lj Complete Application Required The review and consideration of an application submitted shall only occur if such application includes all items that are required in support of the application and is deemed complete by the City Clerk's Office. Application Submission Schedule Application, required information, and payment must be submitted no later than 30 working days prior to desired approval date. Application Information Applicants shall note that in addition to a special event permits, any liquor license or permit, sign permits and building permits for tents may also be required and are not included within the special event permit application and approval. Any requested use of City facilities, City staff resources, City equipment, and/or City property (including rights of way) and/or any requested waiver of application fee or park rental fees requires review and approval by the City Council. In addition, events which occur after 10 PM may requires review and approval by the City Council as related to noise ordinances. Please provide clear information in the application regarding these requests. 07/25/16 Property Owner's Statement I am the fee title owner of the described property and I agree to this application. I certify that I am in compliance with all ordinance requirements and conditions regarding other City approval that have been previously granted. (Signature) (Date) Applicant's Statement This application shall be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding the application. I have completed all of the applicable filing requirements and I hereby acknowledge that I have read and fully understand the applicable provisions of the City Ordinances and current policies related to this application and that the documents and information I have submitted are true and correct. CITY APPROVAL (City Clerk Signature) (Community Development Director Signature) Special Event Permit Approval is granted with the following conditions: Internal review checklist (as applicable): Public Works Routing Law Enforcement Notification Building Department Monticello Community Center Room/Park Reservations irements Applicant Public Works Law Enforcement Notification City Clerk Monticello Community Center Room/Park Reservations Liability Insurance Certificate Received Surrounding Property Owner Notification Complete (Date) (Date) Approved ❑ Denied ❑ Admin I Parks I Streets Director 07/25/16 4 Party in the Park (Downtown Block Party) Information Sheet Date: Wednesday, July 11th 2018 Attachments provided: Time: 5:OOPM - 9:OOPM Layout of Party in the Park Place: West Bridge Park, 107 River StW Monticello Certificate of Insurance - Event See attached map Certificate of Insurance - Liquor Overview: The Party in the Park is being sponsored by all interested downtown and Chamber businesses. This event is being sponsored by the Chamber of Commerce. It is open to the public and is with the purpose of promoting the downtown area, bringing awareness to the public of all of the businesses located downtown and as a way to bring the community together for a day of inexpensive fun. Insurance Information: Event Insurance - Insurance for the event has been secured through the sponsorship of the Monticello Chamber of Commerce and Foster White Insurance Agency. The City of Monticello has been named as additional insured on the policy See attached event insurance information. Liquor Service & Insurance - The Monticello VFW is providing the permit & insurance and will be at the event. They will have a representative at the event to oversee the sale of beer at the event. We have secured one officer from the Wright County Sherrifs Office as well as two reserves who will be on-site from 5:00-9:OOpm The Monticello VFW has a liquor license, and liquor liability insurance which will name The City of Monticello as additional insured for this event. See attached licenses and insurance information. Street & Parkinq Lot Closinq Information: We are requesting the temporary closing of River Street, from the corner of Hwy 25 to the corner of Walnut St next to stairway. (see map) Wednesday, July 11th from 7AM - 10:00 PM. We are also requesting temporary NO PARKING signs be posted at the parking spaces to West Bridge Park. Wednesday, July 11th to begin at 7 AM through 10PM. This will ensure that their will not be any parked cars in the area at 7AM Wed. Citv Eauloment and Assistance Reauested: See attached site map for details. Assistance We are asking the city for assistance in the following ways - Place as indicated the following items No Parking Signs at the parking spaces at West Bridge Park by 7AM on Wed. 7/11/18 Street barricades 7 AM on Wed. 7/11/18 Cones 7AM on Wed. 7/11/18 Pedestrian crossing markers 7AM on Wed. 7/11/18 Picnic tables 9AM on Wed. 7/11/18 Secure permission to place a black sign on the grassy area in front of the water treatment plant on East Broadway. (no assistance needed - just permission) Working with Public Works, Tom Moores & Tom Pawelk on train route Equipment (10) Trash Cans (25) Picnic Tables (10) orange cones (4) Stop for Pedestrians in Cross Walk Signs in the downtown area (if available) No Parking Signs Street Barricades Walnut Street at River Street River Street at Hwy 25 Entrance/Exit to City parking lot 7I OP ID: MS `��coRo DAYCERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE 06/07/20181 l THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). PRODUCER CONTACT Foster White Agency, Inc. NAME: Jake Olinger 114 West 3rd Street ca/°Nt o, Extl: 763-295-2614 (A°C Na): 763-295-3010 Monticello, r 55362 I ADDRESS: jolinger@foster-white.com Jake Olinger I PRODUCER MONTI-4 CUSTOMER ID #: INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC # INSURED Monticello Chamber of Commerce INSURERA:West Bend Mutual Insurance Co 15350 PO Box 192 Monticello, MN 55362 I INSURER 13: INSURER C INSURER D: INSURER E: INSURER F: COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: REVISION NUMBER: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. INSR li ADDL SUBR'I POLICY EFF I POLICY EXP LTR TYPE OF INSURANCE INSR WVD POLICY NUMBER (MM/DD/YYYYI (MMIDD/YYYYI LIMIT GENERAL LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE $ 1,000,000 A X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY Y NSO 1078042 04/20/2018 04/20/2019 DAMAGERENTED 100,000 PREMISESS ( (Ea occurrence) $ CLAIMS -MADE a OCCUR MED EXP (Any one person) $ 5,000 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS I LOCATIONS I VEHICLES (Attach ACORD 1014 Additional Remarks Schedule, if more space is required) City of Monticello is named as an Additional Insured to respect to General Liability. RE: Art in the Park/Taste of of Monticello and Party in the Park CERTIFICATE HOLDER CITYMON City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street Monticello, MN 55362 CANCELLATION SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE Jake Olinger © 1988-2009 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. ACORD 25 (2009/09) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD PERSONAL & ADV INJURY $ 1,000,000 GENERAL AGGREGATE $ 2,000,000 GENT AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG $ 2,000,000 X FI PRS n I POLICY LOC $ AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT $ 1'000,000 (Ea accident) ANY AUTO BODILY INJURY (Per person) $ ALL OWNED AUTOS BODILY INJURY (Per accident) $ SCHEDULED AUTOS PROPERTY DAMAGE $ A X HIRED AUTOS NSO 1078042 04/20/2018 04/20/2019 (PER ACCIDENT) A X NON -OWNED AUTOS NSO 1078042 04/20/2018 04/20/20191 $ X UMBRELLA LIAB OCCUR HCLAIMS-MADE EACH OCCURRENCE $ 1,000,000 EXCESS LAB A NUO 2097834 04/20/2018 AGGREGATE 04/20/2019 $ 1,000,000 DEDUCTIBLE $ X RETENTION $ 10,000 $ WORKERS COMPENSATION WC STATU- 1 IOTH- AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY Y / N ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE TORY LIMITS ER OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? ❑ NIA E.L. EACH ACCIDENT $ (Mandatory in NH) E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE $ If yes, describe under DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT $ A D & O Liability NNO 1088832 04/20/2018 04/20/2019 Aggregate 1,000,000 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS I LOCATIONS I VEHICLES (Attach ACORD 1014 Additional Remarks Schedule, if more space is required) City of Monticello is named as an Additional Insured to respect to General Liability. RE: Art in the Park/Taste of of Monticello and Party in the Park CERTIFICATE HOLDER CITYMON City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street Monticello, MN 55362 CANCELLATION SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE Jake Olinger © 1988-2009 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. ACORD 25 (2009/09) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD City Council Agenda: 06/25/2018 2I. Consideration of avvrovin2 an application for temvorary on -sale liquor license for the VFW Post 8731 for Monticello Chamber of Commerce Partv in the Park event on Julv 11, 2018 (JS) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The VFW is requesting approval of a 1 -day temporary on -sale liquor license application for the Chamber of Commerce Party in the Park event to be held on Wednesday, July 11, 2018. The VFW will provide a certificate of insurance for this event. Al. Budget Impact: None A2. Staff Workload Impact: Minimal staff time to send applications to State Alcohol and Gambling Division for approval and signatures. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the temporary one day liquor license. 2. Motion to deny. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends Alternative #1 for approval of the applications. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • Application for temporary on -sale liquor license 1 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY I I , Minnesota Department of Public Safety Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division 445 Minnesota Street, Suite 222, St. Paul, MN 55101 651-201-7500 Fax 651-297-5259 TTY 651-282-6555 APPLICATION AND PERMIT FOR A 1 DAY TO 4 DAY TEMPORARY ON -SALE LIQUOR LICENSE Name of organization= r anization _ Address Narrl erson application ( , ':zNI9 ne- Date(s) of event I July 11, 2018 ,1rgaAization off 'cer Orga zati icer's name Date orga ized Tax exempt number MIS I I I 1 IJ6 B 1100r6l'__b_ r-)3 f n9 O'S Ic%�� IMN IZ��l��l Business phone Home phone 1� L73 (0 oil Type of organization [� Club ❑ Charitable D Religious ❑ Other non-profit Cit IMNe Cit l State 1 .Ma Cei 6 IMN Organ' ion o is eCit Lel Organizat' n ffiT�"Oln cer's nCity I iTf'_ 1(Yloln �,j Location where permit will be used. If an outdoor area, describe. West Bridge Park - Chamber Party in the Park State 101 IMN State IMN Zip Code Zip Code ��, _)s 1a Zip Code Zip Code If the applicant will contract for intoxicating liquor service give the name and address of the liquor license providing the service. If the applicant will carry liquor liability insurance please provide the carrier's name and amount of coverage. APPROVAL APPLICATION MUST BE APPROVED BY CITY OR COUNTY BEFORE SUBMITTING TO ALCOHOL AND GAMBLING ENFORCEMENT City or County approving the license Fee Amount Date Fee Paid Date Approved Permit Date City or County E-mail Address City or County Phone Number Signature City Clerk or County Official Approved Director Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement CLERKS NOTICE: Submit this form to Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division 30 days prior to event. ONE SUBMISSION PER EMAIL, APPLICATION ONLY. PLEASE PROVIDE A VALID E-MAIL ADDRESS FOR THE CITY/COUNTY AS ALL TEMPORARY PERMIT APPROVALS WILL BE SENT BACK VIA EMAIL. E-MAIL THE APPLICATION SIGNED BY CITY/COUNTY TO AGE.TEMPORARYAPPLICATION@STATE.MN.US City Council Agenda: 06/25/2018 2J. Consideration of approving a lease agreement with Wright Countv for election equipment (JS) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: City Council is asked to approve a lease agreement Wright County for new election equipment. The Wright County Board of Commissioners recently adopted a resolution providing for the acquisition and standardization of election equipment over the next two election cycles. All precincts in Wright County will be using electronic poll pads to register and check-in voters for the 2018 elections. By the 2020 State Primary election, all precincts will be using the new DW200 optical scanner. Wright County is requesting the city's approval of the lease agreement by July 1 of this year for planning purposes. The cost is $200 annual maintenance fee for each DS200 and AutoMark. Monticello will be using three DS200 and two AutoMarks for a total maintenance cost of $1000. All other expenses, including the maintenance fee for the poll pads, are being covered by Wright County. In addition, there is a method for Wright County to purchase additional equipment for Monticello in the event we need another DS200 for the current precinct or create a new precinct. Al. Budget Impact: The County is looking to purchase the DS200s in 2019 for deployment in 2020. The maintenance expense will begin in 2019. A2. Staff Workload Impact: NA. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve a lease agreement with Wright County for election equipment beginning in 2019. 2. Motion of other. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends Alternative #1. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • Lease Agreement THIS AGREEMENT, made by and between the COUNTY OF WRIGHT and the MONTICELLO CITY both political subdivisions of the State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as the "County" and the "Municipality" respectively. For purposes of this Agreement, the address of the County is 10 2nd Street N.W., Suite 230, Buffalo, Minnesota 55313 and the address of the Municipality is 505 Walnut Street, Monticello, MN 55362. WITNESSETH WHEREAS, the Wright County Board of Commissioners in Resolution Number 18-23 authorized the purchase of election equipment (hereinafter "Election Equipment") for a countywide digital scan voting system, election hardware and services; and WHEREAS, the Wright County Board of Commissioners in Resolution Number 18-23 authorized the purchase of Assisted Voting Technology equipment (hereinafter "AVT Equipment") for a countywide optical scan voting system, election hardware and services; and WHEREAS, the County pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 471.85 may transfer property to the Municipality for its use; and WHEREAS, the County desires to lease Election Equipment to Monticello City for use in all elections. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual undertakings and agreements hereinafter set forth, the County and the Municipality agree as follows: Section 1 SCOPE OF AGREEMENT 1.1 Starting with the 2020 State Primary Election, the County hereby leases to the Municipality at the cost identified below and subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, and the Municipality hereby agrees to lease from the County Election Equipment identified as: 5 DS200 (Digital Scan Precinct Count Unit(s), and 5 DS200 Plastic Ballot Box(es) for polling places contained within the Municipality. 1.2 During the term of this Agreement and subject to the terms herein, County hereby provides to Municipality and grants Municipality a limited, revocable, non- exclusive, royalty -free license to use 7 KNOWiNK Poll Pad Hardware and Software units, a sufficient number of Verizon Hotspot(s) Solutions and wireless access point(s) (the "KNOWiNK Poll Pad") exclusively for official election use. MONTICELLO CITY Page 1 of 8 Unless County otherwise agrees in writing, said license is restricted to access and use of the Election Equipment by Municipality's employees, contracted personnel and duly authorized election officials performing election duties and responsibilities on behalf of Municipality. 1.3 The County hereby leases to the Municipality at the cost identified below and subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, and the Municipality hereby agrees to lease from the County Election Equipment identified as: 7 KNOWiNK Poll Pad Systems (including a iPad WiFi 32 gb, Charger, Printer, Transport Case, Stand, Stylus, and Wireless Hotspot solution) for polling places contained within the Municipality. 1.4 Subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the parties may agree by written addendum executed by all the parties to increase or decrease the County Election Equipment included within the scope of this agreement. Wright County hereby delegates authority to execute such an addendum to the County Auditor/Treasurer. The Municipality hereby delegates authority to execute such an addendum to its City Administrator/Clerk. Section 2 00WNERSriIP 2.1 The Municipality acknowledges that the County owns the Election Equipment and that the Municipality is authorized to use said Election Equipment for official election related purposes. Use of the Election Equipment for any other purpose is strictly prohibited absent express written consent of the County Auditor/Treasurer. 2.2 The Municipality acknowledges and agrees that the Election Equipment may contain proprietary and trade secret information that is owned by Election Systems and Software (ES&S) or KNOWiNK, LLC and is protected under federal copyright law or other laws, rules, regulations and decisions. The Municipality shall protect and maintain the proprietary and trade secret status of the Election and AVT Equipment. Section 3 HANDLING OF EQUIPMENT AND INDEMNIFICATION 3.1 The Municipality shall be responsible for the Election Equipment while it is in the Municipality's custody. The Municipality, either through insurance or a self- insurance program, shall be responsible for all costs, fees, damages and expenses including but not limited to personal injury, storage, damage, repair and/or replacement of the Election Equipment while it's in the Municipality's custody and this contract is in effect, consistent with the Municipality's defense and indemnity obligations contained in Section 7.6 herein. MONTICELLO CITY Page 2 of 8 3.2 The Municipality shall be responsible for the transporting of the Election Equipment from and to the County. Upon termination of this Agreement, the Municipality shall forthwith deliver the Election Equipment to the County or its designee, complete and in good order and working condition. The Municipality shall be responsible for all costs, including but not limited to shipping, related to the repair or replacement of lost, stolen, destroyed or damaged Election Equipment. 3.3 Municipality shall secure, safeguard and control the Election Equipment, including but not limited to system authentication and passwords, in the same manner that Municipality secures, safeguards and controls its own critical or confidential equipment, systems, software, data, passwords or other information. While the Election Equipment is in Municipality's possession, custody and/or control, Municipality shall exercise best efforts to (i) use and handle the Election Equipment in a manner that avoids damage or harm to the Election Equipment; (ii) use and handle the Election Equipment in accordance with County direction and any third -party specification; and (iii) safeguard and secure the Election Equipment from theft, loss or other damage. Section 4 TERM, TERMINATION 4.1 The Municipality and the County agree that this Agreement is in effect commencing upon signature by the County. The Municipality and County agree that this Agreement will terminate when the Municipality and County mutually agree that the equipment will no longer be used for the Municipality's elections, unless terminated sooner by either party with cause upon seven (7) calendar days' written notice to the other. Section 5 MAINTENANCE 5.1 Maintenance Agreement (DS200 and AutoMark) The County has entered into a Maintenance Agreement with Election Systems & Software for the maintenance of the DS200 and AutoMark. Starting in 2019, the Municipality agrees that it will reimburse the County two hundred dollars ($200.00) for maintenance and license fees associated with the each DS200 and each AutoMark leased to, or owned by the Municipality. The Municipality agrees to reimburse the County within 60 days of invoice. The Municipality and the County agree to renegotiate this reimbursement fee in the event the maintenance and license fees increase by more than 25%. MONTICELLO CITY Page 3 of 8 5.2 The Municipality agrees not to make any repairs, changes, modifications or alterations to the Election Equipment that are not authorized by Wright County and said vendors. 5.3 After reasonable notice, the County shall have the right to enter into and upon the premises where the Election Equipment is located for the purposes of inspecting the same or observing its use, except that on an election day the County is not required to provide any reasonable notice. On an annual basis, during the term of this Agreement, the Municipality shall comply with the County's request for verification of Election Equipment inventory. 5.4 The Municipality agrees to provide notice to Election Systems & Software of any defects or malfunctions with the DS200 Election Equipment within twenty-four (24) hours. The Municipality also agrees to provide notice to KNOWiNK, LLC of any defects or malfunctions with the KNOWiNK Poll Pad within twenty-four (24) hours. The Municipality also agrees to provide the County with notice of such malfunctions or defects and Election Systems & Software's/KNOWiNK's response within a reasonable time. The county agrees to track via a log all such equipment malfunctions. Section 6 PROGRAMMING AND ACCUMULATION 6.1 Programming. The County will be responsible for programming the DS200 Digital Scan Election Equipment and the KNOWiNK Poll Pads at no charge to jurisdictions for all races in all elections. 6.2 Voter Registration Updates. The County has invested a significant amount of resources in equipment that allows the KNOWiNK Poll Pads to electronically transmit and receive live voter registration updates via wireless technology from each polling place to a central location and for those updates to be linked to the Statewide Voter Registration System. There is also a significant operational cost associated with this transmission and update process. The Municipality agrees to assist the County and the County's vendor in setting up and maintaining this transmission and update system. The parties agree Wright County is assuming all costs for this service and the licensing and maintenance of the KNOWiNK poll pads. Section 7 OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS 7.1 No Waiver. No delay or omission by either party hereto to exercise any right or power occurring upon any noncompliance or default by the other party with respect to any of the terms of this Agreement shall impair any such right or power or be construed to be a waiver thereof unless the same is consented to in writing. A waiver by either of the parties hereto of any of the covenants, conditions, or MONTICELLO CITY Page 4 of 8 agreements to be observed by the other shall not be construed to be a waiver of any succeeding breach thereof or of any covenant, condition, or agreement herein contained. All remedies provided for in this Agreement shall be cumulative and in addition to, and not in lieu of, any other remedies available to either party at law, in equity, or otherwise. 7.2 Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. 7.3 Entire Agreement. It is understood and agreed that the entire Agreement between the parties is contained herein and that this Agreement supersedes all oral agreements and negotiations between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof. All items referred to in this Agreement are incorporated or attached and are deemed to be part of this Agreement. Any alterations, variations, modifications, or waivers of provisions of this Agreement shall only be valid when they have been reduced to writing as an amendment to this Agreement signed by the parties hereto. 7.4 No Assignment. Neither party shall assign, sublet or transfer this Agreement, either in whole or in part, without the prior written consent of the other party, and any attempt to do so shall be void and of no force and effect. 7.5 DISCLAIMER. LDABILITY AND LIMITATION OF LIABILITY COUNTY, BY AND THROUGH ITS DULY AUTHORIZED VENDOR, IS PROVIDING THE ELECTION EQUIPMENT ON AN AS -IS BASIS WITH NO SUPPORT WHATSOEVER. OTHER THAN AS STATED IN THIS AGREEMENT, THERE IS NO WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY, NO WARRANTY OF FITNESS FOR PARTICULAR USE, NO WARRANTY OF NON - INFRINGEMENT, NO WARRANTY REGARDING THE USE OF THE INFORMATION OR THE RESULTS THEREOF AND NO OTHER WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED. THE MUNICIPALITY ACKNOWLEDGES AND AGREES THAT COUNTY DOES NOT OWN OR CONTROL THE DATA SOURCE/SYSTEM NECESSARY FOR OPERATION OF THE ELECTION EQUIPMENT. WITHOUT LIMITING THE FOREGOING, COUNTY DOES NOT WARRANT THE PERFORMANCE OF THE ELECTION EQUIPMENT OR RELATED COMMUNICATIONS OR CONNECTIONS TO ANY DATA SOURCE/SYSTEM, THAT THE DATA SOURCE/SYSTEM WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR ERROR FREE, THAT THE DATA IS ACCURATE, COMPLETE AND CURRENT OR THAT DATA DEFECTS WILL BE CORRECTED, OR THAT THE DATA SOURCE/SYSTEM IS FREE OF HARMFUL CODE. IN NO EVENT SHALL COUNTY BE LIABLE FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES OR LOSS OF PROFIT, LOSS OF BUSINESS OR ANY OTHER FINANCIAL LOSS OR ANY OTHER DAMAGES EVEN IF COUNTY HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE MONTICELLO CITY Page 5 of 8 POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. COUNTY'S SOLE LIABILITY AND THE MUNICIPALITY'S SOLE AND EXCLUSIVE REMEDY FOR ANY DAMAGES RELATED TO THIS AGREEMENT, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO LIABILITY FOR ELECTION EQUIPMENT NONPERFORMANCE, ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, SHALL BE LIMITED TO RESTORING OR CORRECTING THE ELECTION EQUIPMENT TO THE EXTENT AND DEGREE COUNTY IS CAPABLE OF PERFORMING THE SAME AND AS IS REASONABLY POSSIBLE UNDER THE PERTINENT CIRCUMSTANCES. 7.6 The County and the Municipality agree each will be responsible for their own acts and omissions under this Agreement and the results thereof and shall to the extent authorized by law defend, indemnify and hold harmless the other party for such acts. Each party shall not be responsible for the acts, errors or omissions of the other party under the Agreement and the results thereof. The parties' respective liabilities shall be governed by the provisions of the Municipal Tort Claims Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 466, and other applicable law. This paragraph shall not be construed to bar legal remedies one party may have for the other party's failure to fulfill its obligations under this Agreement. Nothing in this Agreement constitutes a waiver by the Municipality or County of any statutory or common law defenses, immunities, or limits on liability. The statutory limits of liability for the parties may not be added together or stacked to increase the maximum amount of liability for either or both parties. 7.7 Notice. Any notice or demand shall be in writing and shall be sent registered or certified mail to the other party addressed as follows: To the Municipality: Monticello City 505 Walnut Street Monticello, MN 55362 To the County: Robert Hiivala Wright County Auditor/Treasurer 10 2nd Street N.W., Suite 230 Buffalo, MN 55313 7.8 Audit Provision. Both parties agree that either party, the State Auditor, the Minnesota Secretary of State, or any of their duly authorized representatives at any time during normal business hours, and as often as they may reasonably deem necessary, shall have access to and the right to examine, audit, excerpt, and transcribe any books, documents, papers, records, etc., which are pertinent to the accounting practices and procedures of the other party and involve transactions relating to this Agreement. Such materials shall be maintained and such access and rights shall be in force and effect during the period of the contract and for six (6) years after its termination or cancellation. MONTICELLO CITY Page 6 of 8 7.9 Data Practices. The parties, their officers, agents, owners, partners, employees, volunteers and subcontractors shall abide by the provisions of the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes, chapter 13 (MGDPA) and all other applicable state and federal laws, rules, regulations and orders relating to data privacy or confidentiality, which may include the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA). 7.9 Whereas Clauses. The matters set forth in the "Whereas" clauses on page one of this Agreement are incorporated into and made a part hereof by this reference. 7.10 Survival of Provisions. It is expressly understood and agreed that the obligations and warranties of the Municipality and County hereof shall survive the completion of performance and termination or cancellation of this Agreement. 7.11 Authority. The person or persons executing this Lease Agreement on behalf of the Municipality and County represent that they are duly authorized to execute this Lease Agreement on behalf of the Municipality and the County and represent and warrant that this Lease Agreement is a legal, valid and binding obligation and is enforceable in accordance with its terms. THE REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE IS BLANK. MONTICELLO CITY Page 7 of 8 APPROVAL COUNTY OF WRIGHT STATE OF MINNESOTA By: County Coordinator Date: CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR warrants that the person who executed this Agreement is authorized to do so on behalf of CONTRACTOR as required by applicable articles, bylaws, resolutions or ordinances*. MONTICELLO CITY By: Printed Name: Printed Title: Date: MONTICELLO CITY Page 8 of 8 City Council Agenda: 06/25/2018 2K. Consideration of adopting Ordinance 698 amending Title 3, Chapter 20 (Mobile Food Units), Section 4 (D) of the Monticello Citv Code to change the time period of an annual license to be a full calendar vear (JS) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: On May 8, 2017 the City Council approved the Mobile Food Unit Ordinance. As part of the ordinance, the annual license was authorized to run April 1 — October 31 of any given year. The reason for these original dates was to allow food trucks at events that take place primarily throughout the summer months. However, as the city has seen a growing interest in food trucks for a variety of locations/events, we recommend that the annual license be adapted to cover the full calendar year. This will specifically help businesses that use food trucks year -around such as brewery/taprooms. The fee would remain $50 and those that have already received their licenses for 2018 would automatically be extended to December 31 with approval of the ordinance. Al. Budget Impact: None. A2. Staff Workload Impact: None. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to adopt Ordinance 698 amending title License which would extend the license period to run January 1 — December 31. 2. Motion to deny Ordinance change. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends Alternative #1 above. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Draft Ordinance ORDINANCE NO. 698 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 3, CHAPTER 20, SECTION 4 (D) OF THE MONTICELLO CITY CODE TITLED LICENSE IT IS HEREBY ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota: Section 1. The following provisions of Title 3, Chapter 20, Section 4(D) of the Monticello City Code shall be amended to read as follows: 3-20-4 (D): LICENSE: (D) License. A mobile food unit license is non -transferable. Proof of license shall be displayed at all times in the mobile food unit. M,.bile feed •ffi* eper-alima- o o cur is Iianuar-y, Feb a fy, N,r,,, eh, ,. ov r,,�b cv� and Deeembef.A mobile food unit license is an annual license that runs January — December of each year. Section 2. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage and publication. The ordinance in its entirety shall be posted on the City website after publication. Copies of the complete Ordinance are available online and at Monticello City Hall for examination upon request. ADOPTED BY the Monticello City Council this 25th day of June, 2018. CITY OF MONTICELLO Brian Stumpf, Mayor ATTEST: Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator VOTING IN FAVOR: VOTING IN OPPOSITION: City Council Agenda: 06/25/2018 2L. Consideration of approving a Special Event Permit for outdoor entertainment at Chatter's Bar & Grill on Julv 13 and 14, 2018. Applicant: Steffens, Brooke/Chatters Restaurant (JS) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The City has received a Special Event permit application from Chatters Restaurant for live entertainment activities after 10 p.m. Special Event permits are brought to the City Council if there is the potential that the activity proposed could impact the City's regulations pertaining to noise. The Special Event Ordinance allows the City Council to approve Special Event permits for activity after 10 p.m. 3-19-2: (D) Special events shall not operate before 7 a.m. or after 10 p.m. unless a Special Event Permit (or other) for such activity has been approved by the City Council. Such permit supersedes the provisions of City Code 6-1-10(B). In this case, Chatter's Restaurant has applied for a Special Event permit for Friday evening, July 13, 2018, and Saturday, July 14, 2018. Their outdoor events are proposed to take place both evenings from 9:00 p.m. to 1:00 a.m. The applicant intends to have live music Friday evening, and a DJ service on Saturday evening. As described by the applicant in their site plan and narrative, it is their intent to have the activity occur in the west area of their parking lot. The Chatters property itself is located directly adjacent on its west property line to Highway 25. The site is surrounded to the north, east and south by commercial property. The property is located approximately 735 feet from the nearest residential property, which is in the Groveland neighborhood. The Groveland neighborhood is separated from the site by both commercial property and Highway 25. The applicant's narrative indicates that the band would be oriented north inside the tent for the event. By orienting the band to the north, the restaurant is intending to minimize the potential the noise impacts to the residential area located to the west. The restaurant is also proposing to enclose the band and activity area with a 30' x 60' tent. The area will also be fenced. The Wright County Sheriff s Office received a copy of the permit application for review and have noted no issues with the event. Al. Budget Impact: None. A2. Staff Workload Impact: Minimal staff time was necessary to review the request and prepare this report. No additional staff time is anticipated for this request. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the Special Event Permit for outdoor entertainment at Chatter's Restaurant Bar & Grill for July 13 and 14, 2018, as described in the application materials, including: a. Exemption from the noise ordinance City Council Agenda: 06/25/2018 b. Pending approval of Chief Building Official on tent permit. 2. Motion to deny the Special Event Permit. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends Alternative #1 above. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Application & Narrative B. Certificate of Liability Coverage C. Event Map CITY COF CITY OF MONTICELLO Community Development 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1 Special Event Permit Monticello Monticello, MN 55362 Application Checklist (763) 295-2711 . info g ci.monticello.mn.us PROPERTY INFORMATION Property Address [ C14AIr S M0 " to 101 M W 6531"? -Z Property Legal Description 1 a.,Y- M D VM f CA I D, M N 65 --3 .Z Property ID Number PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION Owner Name Owner Address Owner Phone Owner Email APPLICANT INFORMATION Applicant Name 6rovVc) 6fc- 4 -ch S Applicant Address 14191 [(�M A r -,&r• H Oh- ( I D, m1 j 6J�-3 &5z Applicant Phone 10 � • 4-S ! ' 1 V -t m l 10 ' 271 T V D ' Cil Mfa S Applicant Email l • cvh2 I Name of Event I�EtAl ft0hrA ba i��n / D4fi(,ialt) b Location/Address of Event [Cc�a,Y rl h t GIID, MN J`531o� Dates & Times of Event 1" 11 ib -11;;I m /—<"C",_IA)y I �►,—(A.E••� Complete Application Required The review and consideration of an application submitted shall only occur if such application includes all items that are required in support of the application and is deemed complete by the City Clerk's Office. Application Submission Schedule Application, required information, and payment must be submitted no later than 30 working days prior to desired approval date. Application Information Applicants shall note that in addition to a special event permits, any liquor license or permit, sign permits and building permits for tents may also be required and are not included within the special event permit application and approval. Any requested use of City facilities, City staff resources, City equipment, and/or City property (including rights of way) and/or any requested waiver of application fee or park rental fees requires review and approval by the City Council. In addition, events which occur after 10 PM may requires review and approval by the City Council as related to noise ordinances. Please provide clear information in the application regarding these requests. 07/25/16 Property Owner's Statement I am the fee title owner of the described property and I agree to this application. I certify that I am in compliance with all ordinance requirements and conditions regarding other City approval that have been previously granted. ( igna�_ L/W, (Date) V10-19 Applicant's Statement This application shall be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding the application. I have completed all of the applicable filing requirements and I hereby acknowledge that I have read and fully understand the applicable provisions of the City Ordinances and current policies related to this application and that the documents and information I have submitted are true and correct. (Signature) CITY APPROVAL (City Clerk Signature) (Community Development Director Signature) Special Event Permit Approval is granted with the following conditions: Internal review checklist (as applicable): Public Works Routing Law Enforcement Notification Building Department Monticello Community Center Room/Park Reservations Post -Approval Routing/Requirements Applicant Public Works Law Enforcement Notification City Clerk Monticello Community Center Room/Park Reservations Liability Insurance Certificate Received Surrounding Property Owner Notification Complete (Date) to ' ZD ' I K (Date) (Date) Approved ❑ I Denied ❑ I Admin I Parks I Streets I Director 07/25/16 4 ACCP CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE DATE(MANDD/YYri) L.� f 06/20/2018 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: if the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(les) must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). PRODUCER ICONTACT Ii NAME: Cheryl Johnson Advantage 1 Insurance AO r-Exti: (320)252-6650 (AM Noi: (320)252-7536 3801 N 3rd Street AADDRESS: cheryl@advantageoneins.com SAINT CLOUD, MN 56303 I INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC/i i INSURERA: Auto Owners Insurance Co. INSURED I West River Restaurants Inc. INSURER B: Ram Mutual Insurance DBA Chatters Restaurant & Bar INSURER C: 4089 Cedar St INSURER D: _ Monticello, MN 55362-4524 INSURER E : I INSURER F: COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: 00000000-749288 REVISION NUMBER: 13 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. INSR I ADDL SUERPOLICY EFF POLICY EXP ' LTR TYPE OF INSURANCE INSD wo POLICY NUMBER {MM/DD/YYYYI IMWMNYYY) I LIMITS A X I COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY Y 08093251 07/01/2018 07/01/2019 1 EACH OCCURRENCE 1$ 1,000,000 CLAIMS -MADE OCCUR DAMAGE TO RENTED PREMISES (Ea occurrence) $ 300,000 MED EXP (Any one person) $ 10,000 PERSONAL & ADV INJURY $ 1,000,000 GEN'LAGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: ! GENERAL AGGREGATE_ $ 2,000,000 POLICY[ JET C LOC PRODUCTS $ _ 1,000,000 OTHER: I $ A AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY 08093251 7 9 0.101/_018 COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT $ 07/01/2019 (Ea accident, 1.000.000 ANY AUTO BODILY INJURY (Per person) Is OWNED SCHEDULED AUTOS ONLY AUTOS BODILY INJURY (Per accdent) $ _ HIRED NON -OWNED X AUTOS ONLY X AUTOS ONLY PROPERTY DAMAGE $ I (Per accident) i $ A UMBRELLA UAB HOCCUR 4902028700 07/01/2018 07/01/2019 1 EACH OCCURRENCE $ 1,000,000 EXCESS LIAB CLAIMS -MADE 1 AGGREGATE $ 1,000,000 DED I X I RETENTION $ 10.000 $ B WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY WC 190485 07/01/2018 PER I OTH- 07/01/2019 X !STATUTE ER ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNEU�,/ N EXECUTIVE E.L.F_ACHACCIDENT I $ 500,000 OFFICE... (Manila ory In ER EXCLUDED? N / A (Mandatory in NH) ___. � E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE _.—_—___—_.___. 500,000 DESCes RIbe under PTION OF OPERATIONS below E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT $ 500,000 A I Liquor Liability 08093251 107/01/2018 07/01/2019 I Liquor 1,000,000 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS / VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached N more space is required) Restaurants -with sale of 30% or more butlers than 75% liquor. City of Monticello is listed as additional insured in regards to the special event being held July 13th & 14th 2018. CERTIFICATE HOLDER City of Monticello 505 Walnut St #1 Monticello, MN 55632 ACORD 25 (2016/03) CANCELLATION SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE (CLI) ©1988-2015 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD Printed by CLJ on June 20, 2018 at 09:36AM �h�tters Restaurant and Bar will be hosting Diamondback (Five band) on Friday July 13`h 2018 from 9:OOpm-1:00am and a All Request DJ (live music) on Saturday July 14th 2018. (Riverfest weekend) We would like to have the band and DJ perform on our front parking lot. The band will be facing north towards the restaurant. The Band/DJ will NOT be facing residential housing. We are also providing a party tent that will cover the entire Band/D1 along with all of our customers which will help with a lot of the noise. We will have a 30x60 ft. tent that will also be fenced off along with a small part of the parking lot. A site plan is attached to show you which spots we will be using. If you have any further questions please feel free to contact Rick or I at 763-271-0070 (Brooke) 763-271-0050 (Rick) Thank you, Brooke Steffens rl m STREET fN,,BeaconT'A Wright County, MN Overview Date created: 6/9/2017 Last Data Uploaded: 6/9/2017 2:4958 AM SdQW� Developed by , The Schneider Corporation Legend Roads CSAHCL — CIYCL — MUNICL — PRIVATECL — TWPCL Highways Interstate — State Hwy — US Hwy City/Township Limits 0 Ot Parcels City Council Agenda — 6/25/2018 2M. Consideration to approve request for Amendment to Monticello Ordinance Chapter 5.4 — Temporary Uses, Chapter 4.1— Landscaping and Screening. Chapter 4.4 — Exterior Lighting, and Chapter 5.3 — Accessory Use Standards. Applicant: Citv of Monticello. (AS) Planning Case Number: 2018-026 A. REFERENCE & BACKGROUND Request(s): Zoning Ordinance Amendments for: 1. Addressing perimeter buffer standards when uses occur within the same zoning district 2. Allowing internal illumination for downcast lighting within awnings 3. Allowing for an expansion of the use of temporary portable container for commercial/industrial and civic uses during active construction 4. Clarifying allowance for fences associated with outdoor patio areas Deadline for Decision: NA Project Description: Consider zoning ordinance amendments for the noted topics, based on previous staff and public experience. ANALYSIS The proposed amendments are four separate proposals to address issues which have arisen over the past several months. Staff have consolidated into one proposed ordinance amendment, although the Planning Commission may choose to remove any specific proposed amendment. 1. Perimeter Buffer Standards: The proposed amendment would exempt commercial and industrial uses within the same zoning district from requirements to provide for perimeter buffering. The presumption is that zoning districts are intended to provide for land uses which have similar impacts and therefore, for the majority of circumstances, perimeter buffering would be unnecessary. Staff have limited the exemption to commercial and industrial districts as where civic or institutional uses may be allowed in residential districts, perimeter buffering would be recommended to minimize potential impact. City Council Agenda — 6/25/2018 In the notations section to Table 4-2 for Buffer Types, staff further proposes to strike language relating to approval through the Administrative Adjustment process. The ordinance was amended previously to remove Administrative Adjustment process and as such, removal of this reference is necessary and a housekeeping item. 2. Awning Illumination: The proposed amendment clarifies that downcast lighting within awnings is permitted. There was some question on this allowance under the current language and staff have fielded a number of questions on this particular provision. There are a number of locations in the community, including downtown, where downcast illumination within awnings is present, providing lighting to the sidewalks, and if lit from an exterior fixture from above, on the awning itself. 3. Temporary Portable Container Storage: Within the last month, the City has received two requests from larger retailers to allow temporary storage in portable containers in their parking areas while major store renovations are underway. The current ordinance language seems to be intended primarily for limited residential use (for example, during moving or small remodeling projects). The proposed language would allow storage within portable containers for larger projects during periods of active construction by permit. The permit would be valid for 30 days, with 30 -day extensions allowable until certificates of occupancy are issued. The ordinance separates residential use allowances from other uses. 4. Outdoor Seating Area Fencing: The proposed ordinance language clarifies that outdoor seating areas would be allowed to construct fences around these facilities, even within front yard areas. Chapter 4.3 — Fences and Walls does not allow fences within front yards in commercial areas. Therefore, the amendment would allow fencing in front yards areas with 50% opacity. Fencing is often necessary for outdoor seating areas to provide for both controlled seating and security. Planning Commission Review and Recommendation Planning Commission reviewed this item and held a public hearing on the proposed amendments on June 5ffi, 2018. No public was present to comment on the proposed amendments. The Commissioners sought clarification that the temporary storage would only be allowed during active construction. Staff confirmed. Oil City Council Agenda — 6/25/2018 The Commission motioned unanimously to recommend approval. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS The Planning Commission recommends Alternative #1 below. 1. Motion to approve the proposed ordinance amendments to Monticello Ordinance Chapter 5.4 — Temporary Uses, Chapter 4.1 — Landscaping and Screening, Chapter 4.4 — Exterior Lighting, and Chapter 5.3 — Accessory Use Standards, based on findings in Resolution No. PC -2018-020. 2. Motion to deny approval of the proposed ordinance amendments to Monticello Ordinance Chapter 5.4 — Temporary Uses, Chapter 4.1 — Landscaping and Screening, Chapter 4.4 — Exterior Lighting, and Chapter 5.3 — Accessory Use Standards, based on findings of the City Council. 3. Motion to table action, pending additional information from staff. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the resolution and ordinances based on the findings in the resolutions. The proposed amendment serve to clarify existing portions of the code and address conditions within the community. D. SUPPORTING DATA A. Resolution No. PC -2018-020 B. Draft Ordinance No. 699 C. Monticello Zoning Ordinance, Excerpts 3 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2018-020 RECOMMENDING AMENDMENTS TO TITLE 10 OF THE MONTICELLO ZONING CODE RELATED TO MISCELLANEOUS SECTIONS WHEREAS, the Zoning Ordinance serves as the primary implementation tool of the City's Comprehensive Plan goals and objectives; and WHEREAS, various portions of the Zoning Ordinance have been identified as benefitting from amendment to increase clarity and usefulness; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on June 5th, 2018 on the application and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has identified ordinance amendments to clarify various chapters and sections with changes to the following: CHAPTER 4.1 — LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING CHAPTER 4.4 — EXTERIOR LIGHTING CHAPTER 5.3 — ACCESSORY USE STANDARDS CHAPTER 5.4 — TEMPORARY USES, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: 1. The proposed amendments improve the ability of the Planning Commission and City Council to direct land use and land use policy in the City. 2. The proposed amendments are consistent with the language and intent of the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The proposed amendments address needs arising from a changing conditions, trend or fact; or corrects an error in the original text. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, that the Commission recommends that the City Council adopts the proposed amendments as presented and approved. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2018-020 ADOPTED this 5t" day of June, 2018 by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. ATTEST: Ere MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION By: MITyfj, thair velopment Director F) ORDINANCE NO. 699 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 10 OF THE MONTICELLO CITY CODE, KNOWN AS THE ZONING ORDINANCE, FOR CHAPTER 5.4 — TEMPORARY USES, CHAPTER 4.1— LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING, CHAPTER 4.4 — EXTERIOR LIGHTING, AND CHAPTER 8.4 — DEFINITIONS, CHAPTER 5.3 — ACCESSORY USE STANDARDS. IT IS HEREBY ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota: Section 1. Chapter 4, Section 1(G) — Standards for Perimeter Buffers is hereby amended as follows: (1) Applicability Except for adjoining single-family detached residential uses, adjoining commercial and industrial uses occurring within the same zoning district boundary, and uses in the CCD district, all development shall provide a perimeter landscape buffer to separate it from uses in a different use classification in accordance with Table 4-2: Buffer Tvpes. and Table 4-3: Buffer Tvpe Annlication. Section 2. Chapter 4, Section 1 (G) — Standards for Perimeter Buffers, Table 4-2 is hereby amended as follows. [2]: Perimeter buffer widths (but not vegetation amounts) may be reduced in accordance with Section 2.4(G), Admin stfative djustm ei#s Altematively, appheants may submit. upon approval of an Alternate Landscape Plan under the provisions of Section 4.1(E) if adhering to these requirements is not possible. Section 3. Chapter 4, Section 4(E) — Design Standards for Exterior Lighting is hereby amended as follows: (2) Shielding (d) Awnings Awnings or canopies used for building accents over doors, windows, etc., shall not be internally illuminated (i.e., from underneath or behind the awning). Illumination casting downward from the awning may be allowed provided that the light source shall not extend downward farther than the lowest edge of the awning. Section 4 Section 5 Section 6. ORDINANCE NO. 699 Chapter 5, Section 4 — Temporary Uses, Table 5-5 — Temporary Uses and Structures is hereby amended as follows: Temporary Storage in a Portable Sec Container See Section 5.4(E)(6) Yes 5.4(E)(6) Chapter 5, Section 4 — Temporary Uses is hereby amended as follows: (6) Temporary Storage in a Portable Shipping Container Temporary storage in a portable shipping container shall be permitted to serve an existing use subject to the following standards. (a) For residential uses, a portable shipping container shall not be located: i. On a lot without prior approval from the Community Development Department. ii. In a required front yard; iii. Within ten feet of any lot line or structure; iv. In a manner that impedes ingress, egress, or emergency access; and V. On an individual parcel or site for more than 30 total days over any one-year period. (b) For commercial, industrial or civic uses, portable shipping containers shall not be located: i. On a lot without prior approval from the Community Development Department. ii. Within ten feet of any lot line or structure; iii. In a manner that impedes ingress, egress, or emergency access; and iv. On an individual parcel or site for more than 30 total days over any one year period unless associated with an active building permit. Successive 30 day permits without additional fee may be authorized until a certificate of occupancy is issued. Chapter 5, Section 2 — Accessory Uses is hereby amended as follows: (26) Outdoor Seating — Accessory to restaurant, bar, production brewery 2 ORDINANCE NO. 699 with taproom, micro -distillery with cocktail room, and/or brewpubs (b)(vii) Fences are permitted for outdoor seating areas, provided such fence maintains 50% opacity within front yard areas. Section 7. The City Clerk is hereby directed to make the changes required by this Ordinance as part of the Official Monticello City Code, Title 10, Zoning Ordinance, and to renumber the tables and chapters accordingly as necessary to provide the intended effect of this Ordinance. The City Clerk is further directed to make necessary corrections to any internal citations that result from said renumbering process, provided that such changes retain the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance as has been adopted. Section 8. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage and publication. The ordinance in its entirety shall be posted on the City website after publication. Copies of the complete Ordinance are available online and at Monticello City Hall for examination upon request. Brian Stumpf, Mayor ATTEST: Jeff O'Neill, Administrator AYES: NAYS: CHAPTER 4: FINISHING STANDARDS Section 4.1 Landscaping and Screening Subsection (G) Standards for Perimeter Buffers (b) The above incentives may be combined to achieve a cumulative reduction in the amount of required tree ACI. (G) Standards for Perimeter Buffers (1) Purpose and Intent Perimeter landscape buffers are intended to mitigate potential negative effects of different contiguous uses. (2) Applicability Except for adjoining single-family detached residential uses and uses in the CCD district, all development shall provide a perimeter landscape buffer to separate it from uses in a different use classification in accordance with Table 4-2: Buffer Tees, and Table 4-3: Buffer Tv -pe Application. (3) Types of Buffers Table 4-2: Buffer Tvves, describes four different buffering types in terms of their function, opacity, width, and planting requirements. Where a particular buffer type is required in Table 4-3: Buffer Tvpe Application, the requirement may be met with the combination of minimum buffer width and minimum screening requirements specified under either Option 1 or Option 2. Where an option utilizing a fence or wall is selected, the fence or wall shall comply with the standards of Section 4.3, Fences and Walls. City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 211 CHAPTER 4: FINISHING STANDARDS Section 4.1 Landscaping and Screening Subsection (G) Standards for Perimeter Buffers TYPE A — BASIC BUFFER This perimeter buffer functions as basic edge demarcating individual properties with a slight visual obstruction from the ground to a height of ten feet. TYPE B —AESTHETIC BUFFER This perimeter buffer functions as an intermittent visual obstruction from the ground to a height of at least 20 feet, and creates the impression of special separation without eliminating visual contact between uses. TYPE C — SEMI-OPAQUE BUFFER This perimeter buffer functions as a semi-opaque screen from the ground to at least a height of six feet. TYPE D — OPAQUE BUFFER 2 ACI of canopy trees + 10 ACI of understory trees + 15 small shrubs per 100 linear feet 8 ACI of canopy trees + 10 ACI of understory trees + 15 small shrubs per 100 linear feet 12 ACI of canopy trees + 14 ACI of understory trees + 25 small shrubs per 100 linear feet 2 ACI of canopy trees + 14 ACI of understory trees + 35 small shrubs per 100 linear feet One 4 -foot high berm or one 4 -foot high solid fence + 2 ACI of canopy trees + 16 ACI of understory trees per 100 linear feet This perimeter buffer functions as an opaque screen 18 ACI of canopy trees + One 6 -foot high solid from the ground to a height of at least six feet. This 20 ACI of understory fence + 12 ACI of canopy type of buffer prevents visual contact between uses trees + 55 small shrubs trees per 100 linear feet and creates a strong impression of total separation. per 100 linear feet [ I ]: Any required perimeter buffer width can be reduced to five feet with the provision of a solid masonry wall at least five feet in height along with ten large shrubs per every 100 linear feet. [2]: Perimeter buffer widths (but not vegetation amounts) may be reduced in accordance with Section 2.4(G), Administrative Adjustments. Alternatively, applicants may submit an Alternate Landscape Plan under the provisions of Section 4.1(E) if adhering to these requirements is not possible. [3]: In cases where an adjacent use is designed for solar access, understory trees can be substituted for canopy trees. [4]: Required plantings shall conform to the planting standards outlined in section 4.1(C)(2). [5]: Fences and walls shall comply with the standards in Section 4.3, Fences and Walls. Page 212 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance CHAPTER 4: FINISHING STANDARDS Section 4.1 Landscaping and Screening Subsection (G) Standards for Perimeter Buffers (4) Determination of Required Buffer Type Table 4-3 specifies the type of perimeter landscape buffer that new development shall provide between it and adjacent property, based on the uses present on the development site and that on the adjacent property. The buffer type is indicated by a letter corresponding to one of the four buffer types depicted in Table 4-2, Buffer Lynes. Single -Family Residential n/a A B C D All Other Residential A n/a A B D Civic and Institutional Uses B A n/a A D Office and Commercial Uses C B A n/a C Industrial Uses D D D C n/a [ I ]: Letters in cells correspond to the buffer types listed in Table 4-2, Buffer Tvpes. [2]: Multi -family, townhouse, multi -building campus or shopping center type developments shall provide buffers around the perimeter of the development instead of around individual buildings. (5) Location of Perimeter Buffers (a) Perimeter buffers required by this section shall be located only along the outer perimeter of the parcel where it abuts another parcel, and shall extend to the parcel boundary line or right-of-way line. (b) In an industrial district, perimeter buffers are not required along lot lines abutting streets except as provided for in Tables 4-2 and 443 when abutting non -industrial districts. In such cases, the outdoor operation or storage components shall include perimeter buffers as necessary to screen outdoor use areas from off-site views. (c) A perimeter buffer may be located along shared access easements between parcels in nonresidential developments. City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 213 CHAPTER 4: FINISHING STANDARDS Section 4.4 Exterior Lighting Subsection (E) Design Standards for Exterior Lighting (2) Illumination Direction In all districts, lighting shall be directed downward. In addition, upwardly - directed lighting shall not be used to illuminate structures, except for low -wattage architectural lighting or lighting for the American flag. (E) Design Standards for Exterior LiLyhting All exterior lighting shall meet the following standards: (1) Maximum Lighting Height (a) Except for outdoor sports fields or performance areas, the height of outdoor lighting, whether mounted on poles or walls or by other means, shall be no greater than 16 feet in residential districts and no greater than 25 feet in business districts. (b) Wherever possible, illumination of outdoor seating areas, building entrances, and walkways shall be accomplished by use of ground mounted fixtures not more than four feet in height. (2) Shielding (a) Exterior Light fixtures in excess of 60 watts or 100 lumens shall use full cut-off lenses or hoods to prevent glare or spillover from the project site onto adjacent lands and streets. (b) Interior No interior light source shall be positioned, aimed, or configured so as to result in the light source being visible from land occupied by existing residential development. (c) Canopies No light source in a canopy structure shall extend downward further than the lowest edge of the canopy ceiling. (d) Awnings Awnings or canopies used for building accents over doors, windows, etc., shall not be internally illuminated (i.e., from underneath or behind the awning). Page 238 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance CHAPTERS: USE STANDARDS Section 5.3 Accessory Use Standards Subsection (D) Additional Specific Standards for Certain Accessory Uses (24) Operation and Storage of Agricultural Vehicles, Equipment, and Machinery Vehicles, equipment, and machinery being stored shall be incidental to a permitted or conditionally permitted uses. (25) Outdoor Seating — Accessory to restaurant, bar, production brewery with taproom, micro -distillery with cocktail room, and/or brewpubs (a) For all restaurants, restaurant/bars, production brewery with taproom, microdistillery with cocktail room, and/or brewpubs, if the establishment (building) or outdoor seating area is located within 300 feet of a residential zoning district, the following standards shall apply: (i) The use shall require authorization through a conditional use permit. (ii) Primary access from local residential streets shall be prohibited. (b) Restaurants, restaurant/bars, production brewery with taproom, microdistillery with cocktail room, and/or brewpubs having outdoor seating (including, but not limited to, seating for dining or listening to live or recorded acoustic or amplified entertainment outside of the building) shall comply with the following standards: (i) The outdoor portions of the facility shall not operate after 10:00 P.M. unless a Special Event Permit for such event has been approved by the City Council. Such a permit supersedes the provisions of City Code 6-1- 10(B). (ii) No noise or music shall be generated in any outdoor seating area adjacent to residential property after 9:00 p.m. (iii) The outdoor seating area shall not obstruct the movement of pedestrians along sidewalks or through areas intended for public use. (iv) Outdoor seating shall be fenced and enclosed to control access to the area, with service only from the inside of the facility. (v) No outdoor seating area shall be located within one hundred feet (100') of any property containing single family, two family, or townhouse residential units. (vi) Any outdoor seating area adjacent to residential property shall be fenced and fully screened from view of said residential property. (vii) All lighting shall be hooded and light glare or reflection shall not be visible from adjoining residential property. City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 389 CHAPTERS: USE STANDARDS Section S.4 Temporary Uses Subsection (D) Table of Allowed Temporary Uses and Structures Construction Dumpster (on public ROW/property) Construction Dumpster (on private property) Construction Trailer Mobile Food Units Recreational Vehicle Use Real Estate Office / Model Sales Home Temporary Mobile Cell Site Temporary Sign Temporary Storage in a Portable Container Tents, Canopies, Tarp Garages, and Hoop Buildings Temporary Sale Farmer's Market Garage/Yard Sale Seasonal Sales Temporary Merchant Wayside Stands Special Events Special Events Until issuance of certificate of occupancy or two days following expiration or finaling of a Yes building permit 30 days without a building permit No Until issuance of certificate of occupancy Yes See Title 3, Chapter 20, City Code I month Yes Until 85% occupancy of the phase is reached Yes + Building Permit 30 days Yes + Building Permit 120 days per year Yes 30 days per year Yes 30 days per year Yes Continuous; up to 5 months per year on a Yes single site 4 days per event; 3 events total per calendar No year 60 days per permit; 120 days per calendar Yes year maximum term See Title 3. Chanter 10 of City Code See Title 3. Chapter 10 of City Code See Title 3. Chapter 10 of City Code Sec 5.4(E) I a Sec 5.4(E)(1)(b) Sec 5.4(E)(2) Sec 5.4(E)(3) Sec 5.4(E)(4) Sec 5.4(E)" Sec 4.5(1) Sec 5.4(E)" Sec 5.4(E)L7) Sec 5.4(E)(8) Sec 5.4(E)(9) Sec 5.4(E)(7), & Sec 5.4(E)(I I ) City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance CHAPTERS: USE STANDARDS Section S.4 Temporary Uses Subsection (E) Specific Standards for Temporary Uses permanent dwelling unit for a period not to exceed thirty (30) days while visiting the resident of the property. (b) The recreation vehicle shall have self-contained sanitary facilities or standard on-site facilities as required by the Community Development Department. (c) The parking location of a recreational vehicle shall adhere to the requirements of Section 4.8, Off -Street Parking. (4) Real Estate Sales Office/Model Sales Home One temporary real estate sales office or model sales home per builder or developer shall be permitted in a section or phase of a new residential or nonresidential development provided the office or model home: (a) Is aesthetically compatible with the character of surrounding development in terms of exterior color, predominant exterior building materials, and landscape; (b) Complies with the applicable standards in the approved development plan (if applicable); (c) Is operated by a developer or builder active in the same phase or section where the use is located; and (d) Is removed or the model home is converted into a permanent residential use once 85 percent occupancy in the section or phase of the development is reached. (5) Temporary Mobile Cell Site (a) A temporary mobile cell site may be erected after issuance of a building permit in the case of equipment failure or testing, or for an interim period (limited to 30 days) after a conditional use permit for a permanent cell site is approved. (b) Temporary mobile cell sites shall be removed within 72 hours following completion of testing, the installation of the permanent tower, or resolution of equipment failure. (6) Temporary Storage in a Portable Shipping Container Temporary storage in a portable shipping container shall be permitted to serve an existing use subject to the following standards. A portable shipping container shall not be located: Section 4.8 Off Street Parking Regulations Page 400 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance CHAPTERS: USE STANDARDS Section S.4 Temporary Uses Subsection (E) Specific Standards for Temporary Uses (a) On a lot without prior approval from the Community Development Department. (b) In a required front yard; (c) Within ten feet of any lot line or structure; (d) In a manner that impedes ingress, egress, or emergency access; and (e) On an individual parcel or site for more than 30 total days over any one-year period. (7) Tents, Canopies, Tarp Garages, and Hoop Buildings Tents, canopies, tarp garages, and hoop buildings or similar membrane structures shall: (a) Obtain a building permit from the Community Development Department; (b) Maintain a minimum clearance of 20 feet from all other structures and tents; (c) Not exceed more than two on a single parcel (the Community Development Department may approve more than two as a part of a special event on a single parcel of 20 or more acres in size); (d) Not be erected for more than a total of 30 days in any calendar year with the exception of those uses with valid permits issued under 5.4(E)(8-11); (e) Be limited to a maximum of three occurrences per parcel per year; (f) Not be placed within required landscape areas; (g) Not obstruct emergency vehicle access to adjacent lots or disrupt pedestrian circulation; and (h) The lot or site shall be restored to its original condition within two days of removal of the tent, canopy, tarp garage, or hoop building. (8) Farmer's Market Farmer's markets shall: (a) Be limited to the retail sale of agriculture, horticulture, or floricultural products; (b) Provide adequate ingress, egress, and off-street parking areas; City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 401 City Council Agenda - 06/25/2018 2N. Consideration of adopting Ordinance No. 700 amending the Monticello Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 3, Section 7 for the Floodplain District, and to adopt Ordinance No 700A, a summary ordinance for amendment to the Monticello Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 3, Section 7 for the Floodplain District. (AS) The City Council is asked to review for approval the proposed Floodplain District Ordinance. The ordinance is presented for review and adoption as related to a required Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) update of the flood hazard determination maps and ordinances for floodplain management. Beginning in 2011, FEMA began working with Wright County on an update to existing flood hazard determination mapping. The current Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) panels applicable to the community are dated 1979 and 1981. The flood hazard determination maps serve as the geographic reference for floodplain management and extent of floodplain. The ordinance serves as the administration tool for development with the floodplain area. The floodplain ordinance is required to be adopted prior to the time that the new flood hazard determination maps become final. In 2016, the City received notice for review and comment on the updated Preliminary FIRM and Flood Insurance Study (FIS) report. In response to the notice for review of preliminary FIRM and FIS, City of Monticello staff began working with property owners to understand the proposed maps, as well as to develop floodplain ordinance language as required. Staff mailed letters to each property owner impacted by the floodplain mapping within the city and arranged for work session meetings with property owners to discuss any questions they had regarding the map update. In late 2017, the City was notified that the Preliminary Flood Insurance Rate Map and Study are currently undergoing an additional review. Another update will be sent out for community review prior to the Final Letter of Determination and adoption. This is anticipated to occur in the second half of 2018. At the time that FEMA is ready to adopt the final FIRM and FIS, it will issue a Final Letter of Determination, which serves as notice for the effective dates of the maps and study. The City must adopt an updated floodplain ordinance consistent with the statutes and rules for floodplain management prior to the date the maps and study become effective in order to remain in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). In order to be prepared for what will likely be the final review and notice period in 2018, City staff are proceeding with the ordinance review and hearing process at this time. The NFIP relies on the Flood Insurance Rates Maps (FIRM) and the ordinance to support the program. A Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) shows flood risk zones and their boundaries. Individual communities are responsible for adopting the flood insurance maps and study, adopting and enforcing the ordinance, and requiring and reviewing permits for development within the floodplain. 1 City Council Agenda — 06/25/2018 In broad terms, the purpose of regulating the floodplain as a community is stated within the proposed ordinance and describes the need to protect people and property, to allow for flood insurance eligibility, and to reduce tax dollars spent on flood insurance claims. Further, as building and development occurs within the city, the local -level review supports communication with property owners regarding their project and its relationship to the floodplain requirements. Floodplain management has been delegated to individual cities as a means of providing local review and management. The city's administration of the ordinance also allows Monticello the ability to maintain eligibility within the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). At the present time, the floodplain is regulated by Chapter 18 of the zoning ordinance. As part of the proposed ordinance amendment, Chapter 18, which was adopted in its entirety with the re -codification of the full zoning ordinance in 2011, will be repealed and replaced with the proposed Chapter 3, Section 7(C). The full text of Chapter 18 is included for Council and public reference in reviewing the changes or additions between the existing and proposed language. The proposed Floodplain District ordinance has been prepared to closely follow the model ordinance provided by the Department of Natural Resources, as DNR certification of the ordinance is required. Similar to the format of the zoning ordinance itself, the floodplain ordinance includes the following components: • Purpose • General Provisions • Definitions • Individual floodplain districts: Floodway, Flood Fringe and General Floodplain • Permitted and conditional uses within each district • Subdivision standards and applicable standards for specific uses • Administration • Non -conformities • Violation and Penalty • Amendment The adopted overlay map of the current Floodplain and Shoreland boundaries within Monticello is included for reference. This information is based on the current adopted mapping, which dates back to 1979 and 1981, depending on the applicable map panel. To view in closer detail any given area of the city at present, the use of the online tool - "Make a Firmette" is required. Again, the City Council should note that the City was informed that we will be receiving a new version of the proposed flood hazard determination maps later in 2018. Following the recommended process of the Department of Natural Resources, staff has provided the draft ordinance to the DNR for review. The DNR has given a conditional 2 City Council Agenda — 06/25/2018 approval and the comments of the DNR are included in the draft ordinance prepared for the hearing. Planning Commission Review and Recommendation Staff provided the Planning Commission with an update on the ordinance process during its February and March meetings, walking the Commission through the requirement for ordinance update and providing a highlighted version of the draft ordinance illustrating the primary revisions. In addition, the Commission had an opportunity to review the number of parcels with changes to floodplain extent, based on the prior preliminary mapping. On June 5th, 2018, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the draft Floodplain District ordinance. No public was present to address the Commission on the ordinance. It was noted during the June Commission meeting that the current Chapter 18 would be repealed and replaced with the proposed ordinance. Staff reviewed the format of the ordinance proposed, including the purpose and intent. It was noted to the Commission that the proposed ordinance does not allow new manufactured home parks and recreational camp grounds in the flood plain and sets limits on expansion in those areas. After a short discussion, the Commissioners recommended unanimously that the City Council adopt the proposed ordinance. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS Planning Commission unanimously recommends Alternative #1 below. Decision #1— Ordinance No. 700 1. Motion to adopt Ordinance No. 700 for amendment to Monticello Zoning Ordinance Chapter 3, Section 7 for Floodplain District regulations and repealing Chapter 18 - Floodplain, based on findings in Resolution PC -2018-021. 2. Motion to deny approval of Ordinance No. 700 for an amendment to Monticello Zoning Ordinance Chapter 3, Section 7 for Floodplain District regulations and repeal of Chapter 18 -Floodplain, based on findings to be made by the City Council. 3. Motion to table action for additional information as requested. Decision #2 — Summary Ordinance No. 700A Summary Ordinances must be approved by a supermajority vote of Council. 3 City Council Agenda — 06/25/2018 1. Motion to adopt Ordinance No. 700A a summary ordinance for amendment to Monticello Zoning Ordinance Chapter 3, Section 7 for Floodplain District regulations and repealing Chapter 18 - Floodplain, based on findings in Resolution PC -2018-021. 2. Motion to deny approval of Ordinance No. 700A, a summary ordinance for amendment to Monticello Zoning Ordinance Chapter 3, Section 7 for Floodplain District regulations and repeal of Chapter 18 -Floodplain, based on findings to be made by the City Council. 3. Motion to table action for additional information as requested. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends adoption of the Floodplain Ordinance regulations. These regulations are required to maintain eligibility in the National Flood Insurance Program. As a community along the Mississippi River and other floodplain areas, the adoption of regulations to protect people and property, to allow for flood insurance eligibility, and to reduce tax dollars spent on flood insurance claims is both essential and required. Council will note that at the time FEMA issues a letter of final determination on the revised flood hazard determination maps, the City will likely need to update the Floodplain Ordinance with dates of final maps, as well as update the zoning overlay map. D. SUPPORTING DATA A. Ordinance No. 700: Floodplain Overlay District B. Summary Ordinance No. 700A C. Resolution PC -2018-021 D. MN DNR Conditional Approval Letter E. Chapter 18 — Floodplain: Existing applicable ordinance, adopted without amendment in 2010 re -codification. F. Floodplains & Floodplain Management G. Official Zoning Map — Shoreland & Floodplain Overlay H. Link to FEMA "Firmettes": https://msc.fema.aov/portal 4 ORDINANCE NO. 700 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING MONTICELLO CITY CODE TITLE 10 - MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE, CHAPTER 3, SECTION 7 FOR THE ADOPTION OF ORDINANCES REGULATING THE FLOODPLAIN DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO AND RECOMMENDING THE REPEAL OF CHAPTER 18 REGULATING THE FLOODPLAIN DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTICELL0, MINNESOTA HEREBY ORDAINS. SECTION 1. Monticello City Code Title 10, Chapter 18, is hereby repealed in its entirety and replaced with the following. SECTION 2. Chapter 3, Section 7(C) is hereby amended to read as follows: RESERAIED [NOTE.- Zoniffg eode Chapter 18 in effietprior to adoption efiA�s ehqoter shall eonfinue 3.7(C) — Floodplain District (A) Statutory Authorization. Findings of Fact and Purpose (1) Statutory Authorization The legislature of the State of Minnesota has, in Minnesota Statutes Chapter 103F and Chapter 462 delegated the responsibility to local government units to adopt regulations designed to minimize flood losses. Therefore, the City Council of Monticello, Minnesota, does ordain as follows. (2) Purpose (a) This ordinance regulates development in the flood hazard areas of the city of Monticello. These flood hazard areas are subject to periodic inundation, which may result in loss of life and property, health and safety hazards, disruption of commerce and governmental services, extraordinary public expenditures for flood protection and relief, and impairment of the tax base. It is the purpose of this ordinance to promote the public health, safety, and general welfare by minimizing these losses and disruptions. 197962vi (b) National Flood Insurance Program Compliance. This ordinance is adopted to comply with the rules and regulations of the National Flood Insurance Program codified as 44 Code of Federal Regulations Parts 59 -78, as amended, so as to maintain the community's eligibility in the National Flood Insurance Program. (c) This ordinance is also intended to preserve the natural characteristics and functions of watercourses and floodplains in order to moderate flood and stormwater impacts, improve water quality, reduce soil erosion, protect aquatic and riparian habitat, provide recreational opportunities, provide aesthetic benefits and enhance community and economic development. (B) General Provisions (1) Lands to Which Ordinance Applies This ordinance applies to all lands within the jurisdiction of the city of Monticello within the boundaries of the Floodway and Flood Fringe Districts. The boundaries of the zoning districts are determined by scaling distances on the Flood Insurance Rate Map, or as modified in accordance with 3.7(B)(1)(b) below. (a) The Floodway, Flood Fringe and General Floodplain Districts are overlay districts that are superimposed on all existing zoning districts. The standards imposed in the overlay districts are in addition to any other requirements in this ordinance. In case of a conflict, the more restrictive standards will apply. (b) Where a conflict exists between the floodplain limits illustrated on the official floodplain maps and actual field conditions, the flood elevations shall be the governing factor in locating the regulatory floodplain limits. (c) Persons contesting the location of the district boundaries will be given a reasonable opportunity to present their case to the Planning Commission and to submit technical evidence. (2) Incorporation of Maps by Reference The following maps together with all attached material are hereby adopted by reference and declared to be a part of the Official Zoning Map and this ordinance. Currently effective Flood Insurance Study: o City of Monticello, Minnesota, dated May 1979 o Wright County Minnesota unincorporated areas, dated 8/18/1992 2 197962vi Currently effective Flood Insurance Rate Map panels enumerated below: o City of Monticello, Panel 2705410005B, effective 11/1/1979 o Wright County, Minnesota Panel 2705340018C, effective 8/18/1992 o Wright County, Minnesota Panel 270534001513, effective 8/4/1988 • Currently effective Flood Boundary and Floodway Map panels enumerated below: o City of Monticello, Panel 270541000113, effective 11/1/1979 o City of Monticello, Panel 270541000213, effective 11/1/1979 o City of Monticello, Panel 2705410003B, effective 11/1/1979 • Preliminary Flood Insurance Study: o Wright County Minnesota and Incorporated Areas, dated 6/22/2011 • Preliminary Flood Insurance Rate Map panels enumerated below: o Wright County, Minnesota Panel 27171C0155D, dated 6/22/2011 o Wright County, Minnesota Panel 27171 CO 1601), dated 6/22/2011 o Wright County, Minnesota Panel 27171C01651), dated 6/22/2011 o Wright County, Minnesota Panel 27171C01701), dated 6/22/2011 o Wright County, Minnesota Panel 27171 C0190D, dated 6/22/2011 For any instance where the effective and preliminary maps conflict, the more restrictive map shall apply. These materials are on file in the City Clerk's Office, City of Monticello City Hall. (3) Abrogation and Greater Restrictions It is not intended by this ordinance to repeal, abrogate, or impair any existing easements, covenants, or other private agreements. However, where this ordinance imposes greater restrictions, the provisions of this ordinance prevail. All other ordinances inconsistent with this ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of the inconsistency only. (4) Warning and Disclaimer of Liability This ordinance does not imply that areas outside the floodplain districts or land uses permitted within such districts will be free from flooding or flood damages. This ordinance does not create liability on the part of Monticello or its officers or employees for any flood damages that result from reliance on this ordinance or any administrative decision lawfully made hereunder. 197962vi (5) Severability If any section, clause, provision, or portion of this ordinance is adjudged unconstitutional or invalid by a court of law, the remainder of this ordinance shall not be affected and shall remain in full force. (6) Definitions Unless specifically defined below, words or phrases used in this ordinance must be interpreted according to common usage and so as to give this ordinance its most reasonable application. (a) Accessory Use or Structure A use or structure on the same lot with, and of a nature customarily incidental and subordinate to, the principal use or structure. (b) Base Flood The flood having a one percent chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given year. (c) Base Flood Elevation The elevation of the "regional flood." The term "base flood elevation" is used is used in the flood insurance survey. (d) Basement Any area of a structure, including crawl spaces, having its floor or base subgrade (below ground level) on all four sides, regardless of the depth of excavation below ground level. (e) Conditional Use A specific type of structure or land use listed in the official control that may be allowed but only after an in-depth review procedure and with appropriate conditions or restrictions as provided in the official zoning controls or building codes and upon a finding that: (i) Certain conditions as detailed in the zoning ordinance exist. (ii) The structure and/or land use conform to the comprehensive land use plan if one exists and are compatible with the existing neighborhood. (f) Critical Facilities Facilities necessary to a community's public health and safety, those that store or produce highly volatile, toxic or water -reactive materials, and those that house occupants that may be insufficiently mobile to avoid loss of life or injury. Examples of critical facilities include hospitals, correctional facilities, schools, daycare facilities, nursing homes, fire and police stations, wastewater treatment facilities, public electric utilities, water plants, fuel storage facilities, and waste handling and storage facilities. 4 197962vi (g) Development Any manmade change to improved or unimproved real estate, including buildings or other structures, mining, dredging, filling, grading, paving, excavation or drilling operations, or storage of equipment or materials. (h) Equal Degree of Encroachment A method of determining the location of floodway boundaries so that floodplain lands on both sides of a stream are capable of conveying a proportionate share of flood flows. (i) Farm Fence A fence as defined by Minn. Statutes Section 344.02, Subd. 1(a) -(d). An open type fence of posts and wire is not considered to be a structure under this ordinance. Fences that have the potential to obstruct flood flows, such as chain link fences and rigid walls, are regulated as structures under this ordinance. (j) Flood A temporary increase in the flow or stage of a stream or in the stage of a wetland or lake that results in the inundation of normally dry areas. (k) Flood Frequency The frequency for which it is expected that a specific flood stage or discharge may be equaled or exceeded. (1) Flood Fringe The portion of the Special Flood Hazard Area (one percent annual chance flood) located outside of the floodway. Flood fringe is synonymous with the term "floodway fringe" used in the Flood Insurance Study for Wright County, Minnesota. (m) Flood Insurance Rate Map An official map on which the Federal Insurance Administrator has delineated both the special hazard areas and the risk premium zones applicable to the community. A FIRM that has been made available digitally is called a Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM). (n) Flood Prone Area Any land susceptible to being inundated by water from any source. (o) Floodplain The beds proper and the areas adjoining a wetland, lake or watercourse which have been or hereafter may be covered by the regional flood. (p) Floodproofing A combination of structural provisions, changes, or adjustments to properties and structures subject to flooding, primarily for the reduction or elimination of flood damages. 5 197962vi (q) Floodway The bed of a wetland or lake and the channel of a watercourse and those portions of the adjoining floodplain which are reasonably required to carry or store the regional flood discharge. (r) Lowest Floor The lowest floor of the lowest enclosed area (including basement). An unfinished or flood resistant enclosure, used solely for parking of vehicles, building access, or storage in an area other than a basement area, is not considered a building's lowest floor; provided, that such enclosure is not built so as to render the structure in violation of the applicable non -elevation design requirements of 44 Code of Federal Regulations, Part 60.3. (s) Manufactured Home A structure, transportable in one or more sections, which is built on a permanent chassis and is designed for use with or without a permanent foundation when attached to the required utilities. The term "manufactured home" does not include the term "recreational vehicle." (t) New Construction Structures, including additions and improvements, and placement of manufactured homes, for which the start of construction commenced on or after the effective date of this ordinance. (u) Obstruction Any dam, wall, wharf, embankment, levee, dike, pile, abutment, projection, excavation, channel modification, culvert, building, wire, fence, stockpile, refuse, fill, structure, or matter in, along, across, or projecting into any channel, watercourse, or regulatory floodplain which may impede, retard, or change the direction of the flow of water, either in itself or by catching or collecting debris carried by such water. (v) One Hundred Year Floodplain Lands inundated by the "Regional Flood" (see definition). (w) Principal Use or Structure All uses or structures that are not accessory uses or structures. (x) Reach A hydraulic engineering term to describe a longitudinal segment of a stream or river influenced by a natural or man-made obstruction. In an urban area, the segment of a stream or river between two consecutive bridge crossings would most typically constitute a reach. (y) Recreational Vehicle A vehicle that is built on a single chassis, is 400 square feet or less when measured at the largest horizontal projection, is designed to be self-propelled or permanently towable by a light duty truck, and is designed primarily not for use as a permanent dwelling but as temporary living quarters for recreational, camping, travel, or seasonal use. For the purposes of this 6 197962vi ordinance, the term recreational vehicle is synonymous with the term "travel trailer/travel vehicle." (z) Regional Flood A flood which is representative of large floods known to have occurred generally in Minnesota and reasonably characteristic of what can be expected to occur on an average frequency in the magnitude of the 1% chance or 100 - year recurrence interval. Regional flood is synonymous with the term "base flood" used in a flood insurance study. (aa) Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation (RFPE) An elevation not less than one foot above the elevation of the regional flood plus any increases in flood elevation caused by encroachments on the floodplain that result from designation of a floodway. (bb) Repetitive Loss Flood related damages sustained by a structure on two separate occasions during a ten year period for which the cost of repairs at the time of each such flood event on the average equals or exceeds 25% of the market value of the structure before the damage occurred. (cc) Special Flood Hazard Area A term used for flood insurance purposes synonymous with "One Hundred Year Floodplain." (dd) Start of Construction Includes substantial improvement, and means the actual start of construction, repair, reconstruction, rehabilitation, addition, placement or other improvement that occurred before the permit's expiration date. The actual start is either the first placement of permanent construction of a structure on a site, such as the pouring of slab or footings, the installation of piles, the construction of columns, or any work beyond the stage of excavation; or the placement of a manufactured home on a foundation. Permanent construction does not include land preparation, such as clearing, grading and filling; nor does it include the installation of streets and/or walkways; nor does it include excavation for a basement, footings, piers, foundations, or the erection of temporary forms; nor does it include the installation on the property of accessory buildings, such as garages or sheds not occupied as dwelling units or not part of the main structure. For a substantial improvement, the actual start of construction means the first alteration of any wall, ceiling, floor, or other structural part of a building, whether or not that alteration affects the external dimensions of the building. (ee) Structure Anything constructed or erected on the ground or attached to the ground or on-site utilities, including, but not limited to, buildings, factories, sheds, detached garages, cabins, manufactured homes, recreational vehicles not 7 197962vi meeting the exemption criteria specified in Section 3.7(J)(2)(b) of this ordinance and other similar items. (ff) Substantial Damage Means damage of any origin sustained by a structure where the cost of restoring the structure to its before damaged condition would equal or exceed 50 percent of the market value of the structure before the damage occurred. (gg) Substantial Improvement Within any consecutive 365 -day period, any reconstruction, rehabilitation (including normal maintenance and repair), repair after damage, addition, or other improvement of a structure, the cost of which equals or exceeds 50 percent of the market value of the structure before the "start of construction" of the improvement. This term includes structures that have incurred "substantial damage," regardless of the actual repair work performed. The term does not, however, include either: (i) Any project for improvement of a structure to correct existing violations of state or local health, sanitary, or safety code specifications which have been identified by the local code enforcement official and which are the minimum necessary to assure safe living conditions. (ii) Any alteration of a "historic structure," provided that the alteration will not preclude the structure's continued designation as a "historic structure." For the purpose of this ordinance, "historic structure" is as defined in 44 Code of Federal Regulations, Part 59.1. (7) Annexations The Flood Insurance Rate Map panels adopted by reference into Section 3.7(B)(2) above may include floodplain areas that lie outside of the corporate boundaries of the City of Monticello at the time of adoption of this ordinance. If any of these floodplain land areas are annexed into the city of Monticello after the date of adoption of this ordinance, the newly annexed floodplain lands will be subject to the provisions of this ordinance (8) Detachments. The Flood Insurance Rate Map panels adopted by reference into 3.7(B)(2) above will include floodplain areas that lie inside the corporate boundaries of municipalities at the time of adoption of this ordinance. If any of these floodplain land areas are detached from a municipality and come under the jurisdiction of Monticello after the date of adoption of this ordinance, the newly detached floodplain lands will be subject to the provisions of this ordinance immediately upon the date of detachment. 8 197962vi (C) Establishment of Floodplain Districts (1) Districts (a) Floodway District - The Floodway District includes those areas within Zones AE, A2, A7 delineated within floodway areas as shown on the Flood Insurance Rate Maps and Flood Boundary and Floodway Maps adopted in Section 3.7(B)(2). (b) Flood Fringe District - The Flood Fringe District includes areas within Zones AE, A2, A7 on the Flood Insurance Rate Map and Flood Boundary and Floodway Maps adopted in Section 3.7(B)(2),but located outside of the floodway. (c) Reserved for General Floodplain District (2) Applicability Where Floodway and Flood Fringe districts are delineated on the floodplain maps, the standards in Sections 3.7(E) or 3.7(F) will apply, depending on the location of a property. (D) Requirements for All Floodplain Districts (1) Permit Required (a) A permit must be obtained from the Zoning Administrator to verify a development meets the standards outlined in this ordinance prior to conducting the following activities: (i) The erection, addition, modification, rehabilitation, or alteration of any building, structure, or portion thereof. Normal maintenance and repair also requires a permit if such work, separately or in conjunction with other planned work, constitutes a substantial improvement as defined in this ordinance. (ii) The construction of a dam, on-site septic system, or fence, although a permit is not required for a farm fence as defined in this ordinance. (iii) The use or change of use of a building, structure, or land. (iv) The change or extension of a nonconforming use. (v) The repair of a structure that has been damaged by flood, fire, tornado, or any other source. (vi) The placement of fill, excavation of materials, or the storage of materials or equipment within the floodplain. (vii) Relocation or alteration of a watercourse (including new or replacement culverts and bridges), unless a public waters work permit has been applied for. (viii) Any other type of "development" as defined in this ordinance. 9 197962v1 (2) Building Sites (a) If a proposed building site is in a flood prone area, all new construction and substantial improvements (including the placement of manufactured homes) must be: (i) Designed (or modified) and adequately anchored to prevent floatation, collapse, or lateral movement of the structure resulting from hydrodynamic and hydrostatic loads, including the effects of buoyancy; (ii) Constructed with materials and utility equipment resistant to flood damage; (iii) Constructed by methods and practices that minimize flood damage; and (iv) Constructed with electrical, heating, ventilation, plumbing, and air conditioning equipment and other service facilities that are designed and/or located so as to prevent water from entering or accumulating within the components during conditions of flooding. (3) Flood Capacity In no cases shall floodplain development adversely affect the efficiency or unduly restrict the capacity of the channels or floodways of any tributaries to the main stream, drainage ditches, or any other drainage facilities or systems. (4) Other (a) The storage or processing of materials that are, in time of flooding, flammable, explosive, or potentially injurious to human, animal, or plant life is prohibited. (b) Critical Facilities, as defined in Section 3.7(13)(6)(f), are prohibited in all floodplain districts. (E) Floodway District (FW) (1) Permitted Uses The following uses, subject to the standards set forth in Section 3.7(E)(2), are permitted uses if otherwise allowed in the underlying zoning district or any applicable overlay district: (a) General farming, pasture, grazing, farm fences, outdoor plant nurseries, horticulture, forestry, sod farming, and wild crop harvesting. (b) Industrial -commercial loading areas, parking areas, and airport landing strips. (c) Open space uses, including but not limited to private and public golf courses, tennis courts, driving ranges, archery ranges, picnic grounds, boat launching ramps, swimming areas, parks, wildlife and nature preserves, game farms, fish hatcheries, shooting preserves, hunting and fishing areas, and single or multiple purpose recreational trails. (d) Residential yards, lawns, gardens, parking areas, and play areas. 10 197962vi (e) Railroads, streets, bridges, utility transmission lines and pipelines, provided that the Department of Natural Resources' Area Hydrologist is notified at least ten days prior to issuance of any permit. (2) Standards for Floodway Permitted Uses (a) The use must have a low flood damage potential. (b) The use must not obstruct flood flows or cause any increase in flood elevations and must not involve structures, obstructions, or storage of materials or equipment. (c) Any facility that will be used by employees or the general public must be designed with a flood warning system that provides adequate time for evacuation if the area is inundated to a depth and velocity such that the depth (in feet) multiplied by the velocity (in feet per second) would exceed a product of four upon occurrence of the regional (1% chance) flood. (3) Conditional Uses The following uses may be allowed as conditional uses following the standards and procedures set forth in Section 3.7(K)(4) of this ordinance and further subject to the standards set forth in Section 3.7(E)(4), if otherwise allowed in the underlying zoning district or any applicable overlay district. (a) Structures accessory to the uses listed in 3.7(E)(1)(a)-(c) above and the uses listed in 3.7(E)(3)(b)-(c) below (b) Extraction, fill and storage of soil, sand, gravel, and other materials. (c) Marinas, boat rentals, permanent docks, piers, wharves, and water control structures. (d) Storage yards for equipment, machinery, or materials. (e) Construction of fences that obstruct flood flows. Farm fences, as defined in section 3.7(13)(6)(i), are permitted uses. (f) Travel -ready recreational vehicles meeting the exception standards in Section 3.7(J)(2)(b). (g) Levees or dikes intended to protect agricultural crops for a frequency flood event equal to or less than the 10 -year frequency flood event. (4) Standards for Floodway Conditional Uses (a) All Uses A conditional use must not cause any increase in the regional flood elevations or cause an increase in flood damages in the reach or reaches affected. (b) Fill; Storage of Materials and Equipment (i) Fill, dredge spoil, and other similar materials deposited or stored in the floodplain must be protected from erosion by vegetative cover, mulching, riprap or other acceptable method. Permanent sand and 11 197962vi gravel operations and similar uses must be covered by a long-term site development plan. (ii) Temporary placement of fill, other materials, or equipment which would cause an increase to the stage of the 1 % percent chance or regional flood may only be allowed if the City of Monticello has approved a plan that assures removal of the materials from the floodway based upon the flood warning time available. (c) Accessory Structures Accessory structures, as identified in Section 3.7(E)(3)(a), may be permitted, provided that: (i) Structures are not intended for human habitation; (ii) Structures will have a low flood damage potential; (iii) Structures will be constructed and placed so as to offer a minimal obstruction to the flow of flood waters; (iv) Service utilities, such as electrical and heating equipment, within these structures must be elevated to or above the regulatory flood protection elevation or properly floodproofed; (v) Structures must be elevated on fill or structurally dry floodproofed in accordance with the FP 1 or FP2 floodproofing classifications in the State Building Code. All floodproofed structures must be adequately anchored to prevent flotation, collapse or lateral movement and designed to equalize hydrostatic flood forces on exterior walls. (A) As an alternative, an accessory structure may be internally/wet floodproofed to the FP3 or FP4 floodproofing classifications in the State Building Code, provided the accessory structure constitutes a minimal investment. Designs for meeting this requirement must either be certified by a registered professional engineer or meet or exceed the following criteria: 1. To allow for the equalization of hydrostatic pressure, there must be a minimum of two "automatic" openings in the outside walls of the structure, with a total net area of not less than one square inch for every square foot of enclosed area subject to flooding; and 2. There must be openings on at least two sides of the structure and the bottom of all openings must be no higher than one foot above the lowest adjacent grade to the structure. Using human intervention to open a garage door prior to flooding will not satisfy this requirement for automatic openings. 12 197962vi (d) Structural works for flood control that will change the course, current or cross section of protected wetlands or public waters are subject to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 103G.245. (e) A levee, dike or floodwall constructed in the floodway must not cause an increase to the 1% chance or regional flood. The technical analysis must assume equal conveyance or storage loss on both sides of a stream. (f) Floodway developments must not adversely affect the hydraulic capacity of the channel and adjoining floodplain of any tributary watercourse or drainage system. (F) Flood Frinee District (FF) (1) Permitted Uses Permitted uses are those uses of land or structures allowed in the underlying zoning district(s) that comply with the standards in Sections 3.7(F)(2). If no pre-existing, underlying zoning districts exist, then any residential or nonresidential structure or use of a structure or land is a permitted use provided it does not constitute a public nuisance. (2) Standards for Flood Fringe Permitted Uses (a) All structures, including accessory structures, must be elevated on fill so that the lowest floor, as defined, is at or above the regulatory flood protection elevation. The finished fill elevation for structures must be no lower than one foot below the regulatory flood protection elevation and the fill must extend at the same elevation at least 15 feet beyond the outside limits of the structure. (b) Accessory Structures As an alternative to the fill requirements of section 3.7(F)(2)(a), structures accessory to the uses identified in Section 3.7(F)(1) may be permitted to be internally/wet floodproofed to the FP3 or FP4 floodproofing classifications in the State Building Code, provided that: (i) The accessory structure constitutes a minimal investment, does not exceed 576 square feet in size, and is only used for parking and storage. (ii) All portions of floodproofed accessory structures below the Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation must be: (i) adequately anchored to prevent flotation, collapse or lateral movement and designed to equalize hydrostatic flood forces on exterior walls, (ii) be constructed with materials resistant to flood damage, and (iii) must have all service utilities be water -tight or elevated to above the regulatory flood protection elevation (iii) Designs for meeting this requirement must either be certified by a registered professional engineer or meet or exceed the following criteria: 13 197962vi To allow for the equalization of hydrostatic pressure, there must be a minimum of two "automatic" openings in the outside walls of the structure, with a total net area of not less than one square inch for every square foot of enclosed area subject to flooding; and 2. There must be openings on at least two sides of the structure and the bottom of all openings must be no higher than one foot above the lowest adjacent grade to the structure. Using human intervention to open a garage door prior to flooding will not satisfy this requirement for automatic openings. (c) The cumulative placement of fill or similar material on a parcel must not exceed 1,000 cubic yards, unless the fill is specifically intended to elevate a structure in accordance with Section 3.7(17)(2)(a) of this ordinance, or if allowed as a conditional use under Section 3.7(F)(3)(c) below. (d) The storage of any materials or equipment must be elevated on fill to the regulatory flood protection elevation. (e) All service utilities, including ductwork, must be elevated or water -tight to prevent infiltration of floodwaters. (e) All fill must be properly compacted and the slopes must be properly protected by the use of riprap, vegetative cover or other acceptable method. (f) All new principal structures must have vehicular access at or above an elevation not more than two feet below the regulatory flood protection elevation, or must have a flood warning /emergency evacuation plan acceptable to the City of Monticello. (g) Accessory uses such as yards, railroad tracks, and parking lots may be at an elevation lower than the regulatory flood protection elevation. However, any facilities used by employees or the general public must be designed with a flood warning system that provides adequate time for evacuation if the area is inundated to a depth and velocity such that the depth (in feet) multiplied by the velocity (in feet per second) would exceed a product of four upon occurrence of the regional (1% chance) flood. (h) Manufactured homes and recreational vehicles must meet the standards of Section 3.7(J) of this ordinance. (3) Conditional Uses The following uses and activities may also be allowed as conditional uses as a principal or accessory use only if allowed in the underlying zoning district(s) or any applicable overlay district, following the procedures in Section 3.7(K) of this ordinance. 14 197962vi (a) Storage of any material or equipment below the regulatory flood protection elevation. (b) The cumulative placement of more than 1,000 cubic yards of fill when the fill is not being used to elevate a structure in accordance with Section 3.7(17)(2)(a) of this ordinance. (c) The use of methods to elevate structures above the regulatory flood protection elevation, including stilts, pilings, parallel walls, or above - grade, enclosed areas such as crawl spaces or tuck under garages, shall meet the standards in Section 3.7(17)(4)(f). (4) Standards for Flood Fringe Conditional Uses: (a) The standards listed in Sections 3.7(17)(2)(d) through 3.7(F)(2)(h) apply to all conditional uses. (b) Residential basements, as defined by Section 3.7(B)(6)(d) of this ordinance, are not allowed below the regulatory flood protection elevation. (c) All areas of nonresidential structures, including basements, to be placed below the regulatory flood protection elevation must be structurally dry floodproofed, meeting the FPI or FP2 floodproofing classification in the State Building Code, which requires making the structure watertight with the walls substantially impermeable to the passage of water and with structural components capable of resisting hydrostatic and hydrodynamic loads and the effects of buoyancy. (d) The placement of more than 1,000 cubic yards of fill or other similar material on a parcel (other than for the purpose of elevating a structure to the regulatory flood protection elevation) must comply with an approved erosion/sedimentation control plan. (i) The plan must clearly specify methods to be used to stabilize the fill on site for a flood event at a minimum of the regional (1% chance) flood event. (ii) The plan must be prepared and certified by a registered professional engineer or other qualified individual acceptable to the City of Monticello. (iii) The plan may incorporate alternative procedures for removal of the material from the floodplain if adequate flood warning time exists. (e) Storage of materials and equipment below the regulatory flood protection elevation must comply with an approved emergency plan providing for removal of such materials within the time available after a flood warning. (f) Alternative elevation methods other than the use of fill may be utilized to elevate a structure's lowest floor above the regulatory flood protection elevation. The base or floor of an enclosed area shall be considered above - grade and not a structure's basement or lowest floor i£ 1) the enclosed 15 197962vi area is above -grade on at least one side of the structure; 2) it is designed to internally flood and is constructed with flood resistant materials; and 3) it is used solely for parking of vehicles, building access or storage. The above -noted alternative elevation methods are subject to the following additional standards: (i) Design and Certification - The structure's design and as -built condition must be certified by a registered professional engineer as being in compliance with the general design standards of the State Building Code and, specifically, that all electrical, heating, ventilation, plumbing and air conditioning equipment and other service facilities must be at or above the regulatory flood protection elevation or be designed to prevent flood water from entering or accumulating within these components during times of flooding. Structure shall be subject to a nonconversion agreement with upon the issuance of any permit. (ii) Above -grade, fully enclosed areas such as crawl spaces or tuck under garages must be designed to internally flood and the design plans must stipulate: The minimum area of openings in the walls where internal flooding is to be used as a floodproofing technique. There shall be a minimum of two openings on at least two sides of the structure and the bottom of all openings shall be no higher than one foot above grade. The automatic openings shall have a minimum net area of not less than one square inch for every square foot of enclosed area subject to flooding unless a registered professional engineer or architect certifies that a smaller net area would suffice. The automatic openings may be equipped with screens, louvers, valves, or other coverings or devices provided that they permit the automatic entry and exit of flood waters without any form of human intervention; and 2. That the enclosed area will be designed of flood resistant materials in accordance with the FP3 or FP4 classifications in the State Building Code and shall be used solely for building access, parking of vehicles or storage. (G) Reserved for General Floodplain District (H) Subdivision Standards (1) Subdivisions No land may be subdivided which is unsuitable for reasons of flooding or inadequate drainage, water supply or sewage treatment facilities. Manufactured home parks and recreational vehicle parks or campgrounds are considered subdivisions under this ordinance. 16 197962v1 (a) All lots within the floodplain districts must be able to contain a building site outside of the Floodway District at or above the regulatory flood protection elevation. (b) All subdivisions must have road access both to the subdivision and to the individual building sites no lower than two feet below the regulatory flood protection elevation, unless a flood warning emergency plan for the safe evacuation of all vehicles and people during the regional (1% chance) flood has been approved by the City of Monticello. The plan must be prepared by a registered engineer or other qualified individual, and must demonstrate that adequate time and personnel exist to carry out the evacuation. (c) For all subdivisions in the floodplain, the Floodway and Flood Fringe District boundaries, the regulatory flood protection elevation and the required elevation of all access roads must be clearly labeled on all required subdivision drawings and platting documents. (d) Subdivision proposals must be reviewed to assure that: (i) All such proposals are consistent with the need to minimize flood damage within the flood prone area, (ii) All public utilities and facilities, such as sewer, gas, electrical, and water systems are located and constructed to minimize or eliminate flood damage, and (iii) Adequate drainage is provided to reduce exposure of flood hazard. (1) Public Utilities�Railroads, REo els. and Bridges (1) Public Utilities All public utilities and facilities such as gas, electrical, sewer, and water supply systems to be located in the floodplain must be flood proofed in accordance with the State Building Code or elevated to the regulatory flood protection elevation. (2) Public Transportation Facilities Railroad tracks, roads, and bridges to be located within the floodplain must comply with Sections 3.7(D) and 3.7(E) of this ordinance. These transportation facilities must be elevated to the regulatory flood protection elevation where failure or interruption of these facilities would result in danger to the public health or safety or where such facilities are essential to the orderly functioning of the area. Minor or auxiliary roads or railroads may be constructed at a lower elevation where failure or interruption of transportation services would not endanger the public health or safety. (3) On-site Water Supply and Sewage Treatment Systems Where public utilities are not provided: 1) On-site water supply systems must be designed to minimize or eliminate infiltration of flood waters into the 17 197962vi systems and are subject to the provisions in Minnesota Rules Chapter 4725.4350, as amended; and 2) New or replacement on-site sewage treatment systems must be designed to minimize or eliminate infiltration of flood waters into the systems and discharges from the systems into flood waters, they must not be subject to impairment or contamination during times of flooding, and are subject to the provisions in Minnesota Rules Chapter 7080.2270, as amended. (.n Manufactured Homes and Recreational Vehicles (1) Manufactured Homes New manufactured home parks and expansions to existing manufactured home parks are prohibited in any floodplain district. For existing manufactured home parks or lots of record, the following requirements apply: (a) Placement or replacement of manufactured home units is prohibited in the Floodway District. (b) Placement or replacement of manufactured home units in the Flood Fringe District is subject to the requirements of Section 3.7(F) of this ordinance and the following standards. (i) New and replacement manufactured homes must be elevated in compliance with Section 3.7(E) of this ordinance and must be securely anchored to an adequately anchored foundation system that resists flotation, collapse and lateral movement. Methods of anchoring may include, but are not limited to, use of over -the -top or frame ties to ground anchors. This requirement is in addition to applicable state or local anchoring requirements for resisting wind forces. (ii) New or replacement manufactured homes in existing manufactured home parks must meet the vehicular access requirements for subdivisions in Section 3.7(H)(1)(b) of this ordinance. (2) Recreational Vehicles New recreational vehicle parks or campgrounds and expansions to existing recreational vehicle parks or campgrounds are prohibited in any floodplain district. Placement of recreational vehicles in existing recreational vehicle parks or campgrounds in the floodplain must meet the requirements below. (a) Recreational vehicles are exempt from the provisions of this ordinance if they are placed in any of the following areas and meet the criteria listed in Section 3.7(J)(2)(b): (i) Individual lots or parcels of record. (ii) Existing commercial recreational vehicle parks or campgrounds. (iii) Existing condominium -type associations. (b) Criteria for Exempt Recreational Vehicles: 18 197962vi (i) The vehicle must have a current license required for highway use. (ii) The vehicle must be highway ready, meaning on wheels or the internal jacking system, attached to the site only by quick disconnect type utilities commonly used in campgrounds and recreational vehicle parks. (iii)No permanent structural type additions may be attached to the vehicle. (iv) Accessory structures may be permitted in the Flood Fringe District, provided that they constitute a minimal investment, do not hinder the removal of the vehicle should flooding occur, and meet the standards outlined in Sections 3.7(D)(2) and 3.7(F)(2)(b). (K) Administration (1) Duties A Zoning Administrator or other official designated by the City of Monticello must administer and enforce this ordinance. (2) Permit Application Requirements: (a) Application for Permit. Permit applications must be submitted to the Zoning Administrator on forms provided by the Zoning Administrator. The permit application must include the following as applicable: (i) A site plan showing all pertinent dimensions, existing or proposed buildings, structures, and significant natural features having an influence on the permit. (ii) Location of fill or storage of materials in relation to the stream channel. (iii) Copies of any required municipal, county, state or federal permits or approvals. (iv) Other relevant information requested by the Zoning Administrator as necessary to properly evaluate the permit application. (b) Certification The applicant is required to submit certification by a registered professional engineer, registered architect, or registered land surveyor that the finished fill and building elevations were accomplished in compliance with the provisions of this ordinance. Floodproofing measures must be certified by a registered professional engineer or registered architect. Accessory structures designed in accordance with Section 3.7(F)(2)(b) of this ordinance are exempt from certification, provided sufficient documentation is provided. 19 197962vi (c) Certificate of Zoning Compliance for a New, Altered, or Nonconforming Use No building, land or structure may be occupied or used in any manner until a certificate of zoning compliance has been issued by the Zoning Administrator stating that the use of the building or land conforms to the requirements of this ordinance. (d) Construction and Use as Provided on Applications Permits, conditional use permits or certificates of Zoning Compliance issued on the basis of approved plans and applications authorize only the use, arrangement, and construction set forth in such approved plans and applications, and no other use, arrangement, or construction. Any use arrangement, or construction at variance with that authorized shall be deemed a violation of this ordinance. (e) Record of First Floor Elevation The Zoning Administrator must maintain a record of the elevation of the lowest floor (including basement) of all new structures and alterations or additions to existing structures in the floodplain. The Zoning Administrator must also maintain a record of the elevation to which structures and alterations or additions to structures are floodproofed. (f) Notifications for Watercourse Alterations Before authorizing any alteration or relocation of a river or stream, the Zoning Administrator must notify adjacent communities. If the applicant has applied for a permit to work in public waters pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 103G.245, this will suffice as adequate notice. A copy of the notification must also be submitted to the Chicago Regional Office of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). (g) Notification to FEMA When Physical Changes Increase or Decrease Base Flood Elevations As soon as is practicable, but not later than six months after the date such supporting information becomes available, the Zoning Administrator must notify the Chicago Regional Office of FEMA of the changes by submitting a copy of the relevant technical or scientific data. (3) Variances (a) Variance Applications An application for a variance to the provisions of this ordinance will be processed and reviewed in accordance with applicable State Statutes and Chapter 2 of the zoning ordinance. (b) Adherence to State Floodplain Management Standards A variance must not allow a use that is not allowed in that district, permit a lower degree of flood protection than the regulatory flood protection 20 197962vi elevation for the particular area, or permit standards lower than those required by state law. (c) Additional Variance Criteria The following additional variance criteria of the Federal Emergency Management Agency must be satisfied: (i) Variances must not be issued by a community within any designated regulatory floodway if any increase in flood levels during the base flood discharge would result. (ii) Variances may only be issued by a community upon (i) a showing of good and sufficient cause, (ii) a determination that failure to grant the variance would result in exceptional hardship to the applicant, and (iii) a determination that the granting of a variance will not result in increased flood heights, additional threats to public safety, extraordinary public expense, create nuisances, cause fraud on or victimization of the public, or conflict with existing local laws or ordinances. (iii) Variances may only be issued upon a determination that the variance is the minimum necessary, considering the flood hazard, to afford relief. (d) Flood Insurance Notice The Zoning Administrator must notify the applicant for a variance that: 1) The issuance of a variance to construct a structure below the base flood level will result in increased premium rates for flood insurance up to amounts as high as $25 for $100 of insurance coverage; and 2) Such construction below the base or regional flood level increases risks to life and property. Such notification must be maintained with a record of all variance actions. (e) General Considerations The community may consider the following factors in granting variances and imposing conditions on variances and conditional uses in floodplains: (i) The potential danger of life and property due to increased flood heights or velocities caused by encroachments; (ii) The danger that materials may be swept onto other lands or downstream to the injury of others; (iii) The proposed water supply and sanitation systems, if any, and the ability of these systems to minimize the potential for disease, contamination and unsanitary conditions; (iv) The susceptibility of any proposed use and its contents to flood damage and the effect of such damage on the individual owner; 21 197962vi (v) The importance of the services to be provided by the proposed use to the community; (vi) The requirements of the facility for a waterfront location; (vii) The availability of viable alternative locations for the proposed use that are not subject to flooding; (viii)The compatibility of the proposed use with existing development and development anticipated in the foreseeable future; (ix) The relationship of the proposed use to the Comprehensive Land Use Plan and flood plain management program for the area; (x) The safety of access to the property in times of flood for ordinary and emergency vehicles; (xi) The expected heights, velocity, duration, rate of rise and sediment transport of the flood waters expected at the site. (f) Submittal of Hearing Notices to the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) The Zoning Administrator or other official designated by the City of Monticello must submit hearing notices for proposed variances to the DNR sufficiently in advance to provide at least ten days' notice of the hearing. The notice may be sent by electronic mail or U.S. Mail to the respective DNR area hydrologist. (g) Submittal of Final Decisions to the DNR A copy of all decisions granting variances must be forwarded to the DNR within ten days of such action. The notice may be sent by electronic mail or U.S. Mail to the respective DNR area hydrologist. (h) Record -Keeping The Zoning Administrator must maintain a record of all variance actions, including justification for their issuance, and must report such variances in an annual or biennial report to the Administrator of the National Flood Insurance Program, when requested by the Federal Emergency Management Agency. (4) Conditional Uses: (a) Administrative Review An application for a conditional use permit under the provisions of this ordinance will be processed and reviewed in accordance with Chapter 2 of the zoning ordinance. 22 197962vi (b) Factors Used in Decision -Making In passing upon conditional use applications, the City of Monticello must consider all relevant factors specified in other sections of this ordinance, and those factors identified in Section 3.7(K)(3)(e) of this ordinance. (c) Conditions Attached to Conditional Use Permits The City of Monticello may attach such conditions to the granting of conditional use permits as it deems necessary to fulfill the purposes of this ordinance. Such conditions may include, but are not limited to, the following: (i) Modification of waste treatment and water supply facilities. (ii) Limitations on period of use, occupancy, and operation. (iii) Imposition of operational controls, sureties, and deed restrictions. (iv) Requirements for construction of channel modifications, compensatory storage, dikes, levees, and other protective measures. (v) Floodproofing measures, in accordance with the State Building Code and this ordinance. The applicant must submit a plan or document certified by a registered professional engineer or architect that the floodproofing measures are consistent with the regulatory flood protection elevation and associated flood factors for the particular area. (d) Submittal of Hearing Notices to the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) The Zoning Administrator or other official designated by the City of Monticello must submit hearing notices for proposed conditional uses to the DNR sufficiently in advance to provide at least ten days' notice of the hearing. The notice may be sent by electronic mail or U.S. Mail to the respective DNR area hydrologist. (e) Submittal of Hearing Notices to the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) The City of Monticello must submit hearing notices for proposed conditional uses to the DNR sufficiently in advance to provide at least ten days' notice of the hearing. The notice may be sent by electronic mail or U.S. Mail to the respective DNR area hydrologist. (f) Submittal of Final Decisions to the DNR A copy of all decisions granting conditional uses must be forwarded to the DNR within ten days of such action. The notice may be sent by electronic mail or U.S. Mail to the respective DNR area hydrologist. 23 197962vi (L) Nonconformities (1) Continuance of Nonconformities A use, structure, or occupancy of land which was lawful before the passage or amendment of this ordinance but which is not in conformity with the provisions of this ordinance may be continued subject to the following conditions. Historic structures, as defined in Section 3.7(B)(6) of this ordinance, are subject to the provisions of Sections 3.7(L)(1)(a) — 3.7(L)(1)(f) of this ordinance. (a) A nonconforming use, structure, or occupancy must not be expanded, changed, enlarged, or altered in a way that increases its flood damage potential or degree of obstruction to flood flows except as provided in 3.7(L)(1)(b) below. Expansion or enlargement of uses, structures or occupancies within the Floodway District is prohibited. (b) Any addition or structural alteration to a nonconforming structure or nonconforming use that would result in increasing its flood damage potential must be protected to the regulatory flood protection elevation in accordance with any of the elevation on fill or floodproofing techniques (i.e., FP thru FP4 floodproofing classifications) allowable in the State Building Code, except as further restricted in 3.7(L)(1)(d) below. (c) If any nonconforming use, or any use of a nonconforming structure, is discontinued for more than one year, any future use of the premises must conform to this ordinance. (d) If any structure experiences a substantial improvement as defined in this ordinance, then the entire structure must meet the standards of Section 3.7(E) or 3.7(F) of this ordinance for new structures, depending upon whether the structure is in the Floodway or Flood Fringe District, respectively. If the current proposal, including maintenance and repair during the previous 365 days, plus the costs of any previous alterations and additions since the first Flood Insurance Rate Map exceeds 50 percent of the market value of any nonconforming structure, the entire structure must meet the standards of Section 3.7(E) or 3.7(F) of this ordinance. (e) If any nonconformity is substantially damaged, as defined in this ordinance, it may not be reconstructed except in conformity with the provisions of this ordinance. The applicable provisions for establishing new uses or new structures in Sections 3.7(E) or 3.7(F) will apply depending upon whether the use or structure is in the Floodway or Flood Fringe, respectively. (f) If any nonconforming use or structure experiences a repetitive loss, as defined in Section 3.7(B)(6)(bb) of this ordinance, it must not be reconstructed except in conformity with the provisions of this ordinance. 24 197962vi (M) Violations and Penalties (1) Violation Constitutes a Misdemeanor Violation of the provisions of this ordinance or failure to comply with any of its requirements (including violations of conditions and safeguards established in connection with grants of variances or conditional uses) constitute a misdemeanor and will be punishable as defined by law. (2) Other Lawful Action Nothing in this ordinance restricts the City of Monticello from taking such other lawful action as is necessary to prevent or remedy any violation. If the responsible party does not appropriately respond to the Zoning Administrator within the specified period of time, each additional day that lapses will constitute an additional violation of this ordinance and will be prosecuted accordingly. (3) Enforcement Violations of the provisions of this ordinance will be investigated and resolved in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 7 of the zoning ordinance. In responding to a suspected ordinance violation, the Zoning Administrator and City of Monticello may utilize the full array of enforcement actions available to it including but not limited to prosecution and fines, injunctions, after -the -fact permits, orders for corrective measures or a request to the National Flood Insurance Program for denial of flood insurance availability to the guilty party. The City of Monticello must act in good faith to enforce these official controls and to correct ordinance violations to the extent possible so as not to jeopardize its eligibility in the National Flood Insurance Program. (N) Amendments (1) Floodplain Designation — Restrictions on Removal The floodplain designation on the Official Zoning Map must not be removed from floodplain areas unless it can be shown that the designation is in error or that the area has been filled to or above the elevation of the regulatory flood protection elevation and is contiguous to lands outside the floodplain. Special exceptions to this rule may be permitted by the Commissioner of the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) if the Commissioner determines that, through other measures, lands are adequately protected for the intended use. (2) Amendments Require DNR Approval All amendments to this ordinance must be submitted to and approved by the Commissioner of the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) prior to adoption. The Commissioner must approve the amendment prior to community approval. 25 197962vi (3) Map Revisions Require Ordinance Amendments The floodplain district regulations must be amended to incorporate any revisions by the Federal Emergency Management Agency to the floodplain maps adopted in Section 3.7(B)(2) of this ordinance. SECTION 4.. The City Clerk is hereby directed to make the changes required by this Ordinance as part of the Official Monticello City Code, Title 10, Zoning Ordinance, and to renumber the tables and chapters accordingly as necessary to provide the intended effect of this Ordinance. The City Clerk is further directed to make necessary corrections to any internal citations and diagrams that result from such amendments, provided that such changes retain the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance as has been adopted. SECTION 5. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage and publication as required by law and/or charter. Revisions will be made online after adoption by Council. Copies of the complete Zoning Ordinance are available online and at Monticello City Hall. SECTION 6. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage and publication as required by law. ADOPTED BY the Monticello City Council this 25th day of June, 2018. Brian Stumpf, Mayor ATTEST: Jeff O'Neill, Administrator VOTING IN FAVOR: VOTING IN OPPOSITION: 26 197962vi SUMMARY ORDINANCE NO. 700A CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA A SUMMARY ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 10 OF THE MONTICELLO ZONING CODE CHAPTER 3, SECTION 7 FOR THE ADOPTION OF ORDINANCES REGULATING THE FLOODPLAIN DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO AND RECOMMENDING THE REPEAL OF CHAPTER 18 REGULATING THE FLOODPLAIN DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, on June 25, 2018, Ordinance No. 700 was adopted by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. Due to the lengthy nature of Ordinance No. 700, the following Summary Ordinance No. 700A has been prepared for publication as authorized by state law. The ordinance adopted by the Council amends Title 10 of the Monticello Zoning Code. The general purpose of the ordinance amendments are to clarify various chapters and sections with changes to the following: Chapter 18: REPEALED Amend 3.7: Floodplain District (a) Statutory Authorization, Findings of Fact and Purpose (b) General Provisions (c) Establishment of Floodplain Districts (d) Requirements for All Floodplain Districts (e) Floodway District (f) Flood Fringe District (g) Reserved for General Floodplain District (h) Subdivision Standards (i) Public Utilities, Railroads, Roads, and Bridges 0) Manufactured Homes and Recreational Vehicles (k) Administration (1) Nonconformities (m)Violations and Penalties (n) Amendments A printed copy of the whole ordinance is available for inspection by any person during the City's regular office hours. The complete ordinance will be posted on the City's website following publication. APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION by the City Council of Monticello, Minnesota, this 25th day of June, 2018 CITY OF MONTICELLO Brian Stumpf, Mayor ATTEST: Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator VOTING IN FAVOR: VOTING IN OPPOSITION: CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2018-021 A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO MONTICELLO CITY CODE TITLE 10 - MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE, CHAPTER 3, SECTION 7 FOR THE ADOPTION OF ORDINANCES REGULATING THE FLOODPLAIN DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO AND RECOMMENDING THE REPEAL OF CHAPTER 18 REGULATING THE FLOODPLAIN DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO WHEREAS, the City of Monticello has requested an Amendment to City Code Title 10, Monticello Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 3, Section 7 for the adoption of ordinance regulating the Floodplain District of the City of Monticello; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on June 5th, 2018 on the request and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: I . Flood hazard areas are subject to periodic inundation, which may result in loss of life and property, health and safety hazards, disruption of commerce and governmental services, extraordinary public expenditures for flood protection and relief, and impairment of the tax base. This ordinance promotes the public health, safety, and general welfare by minimizing these losses and disruptions. The ordinance is adopted to comply with the rules and regulations of the National Flood Insurance Program codified as 44 Code of Federal Regulations Parts 59 -78, as amended, so as to maintain the community's eligibility in the National Flood Insurance Program. 3. The ordinance preserves the natural characteristics and functions of watercourses and floodplains in order to moderate flood and stormwater impacts, improve water quality, reduce soil erosion, protect aquatic and riparian habitat, provide recreational opportunities, provide aesthetic benefits and enhance community and economic development. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota: CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2018-021 Pursuant to Minn. Stat. §462.357, the Amendment to Monticello Zoning Ordinance Chapter 3, Section 7 for the adoption of Ordinances Regulating the Floodplain District of the City of Monticello and recommending the repeal of Chapter 18 regulating the management of the Floodplain District of the City of Monticello is hereby recommended to the City Council for approval. ADOPTED this 5h day of June, 2018 by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION Lo ATTEST: �l Angela Schuman , Vor/mNity Development DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES April 9, 2018 The Honorable Brian Stumpf Mayor, City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street Monticello, MN 55362 CONDITIONAL STATE APPROVAL OF FLOODPLAIN ORDINANCE & REQUIRED NEXT STEPS Dear Mayor Stumpf, On behalf of the Department of Natural Resources (DNR), I am writing to conditionally approve the City of Monticello's draft floodplain management ordinance. We received the city's draft floodplain management ordinance via email on March 29, 2018 from Community Development Director, Angela Schumann. This ordinance is being adopted to update the existing ordinance (last updated in 1990), incorporate lands annexed since the last adoption, and adopt preliminary floodplain maps for the City of Monticello and Wright County. The draft ordinance will require further corrections to accurately reference other sections in the ordinance. Suggested changes are noted in the enclosed draft. Apart from these corrections, the draft floodplain management ordinance is in compliance with the state floodplain management rules (MR 6120.5000 to 6120.6200) and, to the best of my knowledge, with the floodplain management standards of the Federal Emergency Management Agency. Therefore, in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 103F, I hereby give conditional state approval of the draft floodplain management ordinance, provided the above-mentioned revisions are made. This approval is valid upon adoption of the draft ordinance by the city and receipt by this office of one (1) copy each of the adopted ordinance (signed and stamped with the community seal), the affidavit of publication, and the completed "Ordinance Processing Checklist" that is enclosed. Please forward these documents to Ceil Strauss, the DNR's State NFIP Coordinator in St. Paul via email or to the address below in the footer. Upon receipt and verification, Ms. Strauss will transmit one copy of these materials and other required NFIP enrollment materials to Mr. John Devine at FEMA's Chicago Regional Office. Please be advised that any future amendments of this ordinance or change in the designation of flood prone areas require prior DNR approval. In addition, you are required to send copies of hearing notices and final decisions pertaining to variance, conditional uses, and ordinance amendments to this agency. Those notices may also be sent to State NFIP Coordinator Ceil Strauss at the address below. Should you have any questions on this ordinance or related matters, please contact Ms. Strauss at (651) 259-5713 or ceil.strauss@state.mn.us. While our office in St. Paul will continue to be the main contact for the ordinance update, your DNR Area Hydrologist will continue to be your main contact for day to day assistance with administering your floodplain Minnesota Department of Natural Resources • Division of Ecological and Water Resources 500 Lafayette Road, Box 25, Saint Paul, MN 55155-4025 management ordinance and questions about other DNR water -related programs and permits. Your Area Hydrologist is James Bedell, who can be contacted at (320) 223-7850 or iames.bedell@state.mmus. The DNR greatly appreciates your community's cooperation and initiative in providing for the reduction of flood damages through the adoption and administration of this ordinance. Sincerely, Jennifer Shillcox Land Use Unit Supervisor Enclosures: Ordinance Certification Checklist ec: Angela Schumann, Community Development Director — City of Monticello Dan Lais, DNR Eco -Waters' Regional Manager Tim Crocker, DNR Eco -Waters' District Manager James Bedell, DNR Area Hydrologist Ceil Strauss, DNR NFIP Coordinator CHAPTER 18 FLOOD PLAIN MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE SECTION: 18-1: Statutory Authorization, Findings of Fact, and Purpose 18-2: General Provisions 18-3: Establishment of Zoning Districts 18-4: Floodway District (FW) 18-5: Flood Fringe District (FF) 18-6: Reserved for Future Use 18-7: 18-8: 18-9: 18-10: 18-11: 18-12: 18-13: 18-1 18-2 Subdivisions Utilities, Railroads, Roads, and Bridges Manufactured Homes/Travel Trailers and Travel Vehicles Administration Nonconforming Uses Penalties for Violation Amendments STATUTORY AUTHORIZATION FINDINGS OF FACT AND PURPOSE: [A] STATUTORY AUTHORIZATION: The legislature of the State of Minnesota has, in Minnesota Statutes, Chapters 104 and 462, delegated the responsibility to local government units to adopt regulations designed to minimize flood losses. Therefore, the City Council of Monticello, Minnesota, does ordain as follows: [B] FINDING OF FACT: 1. The flood hazard areas of Monticello, Minnesota, are subject to periodic inundation which results in potential loss of life, loss of property, health and safety hazards, disruption of commerce and governmental services, extraordinary public expenditures for flood protection and relief, and impairment of the tax base, all of which adversely affect the public health, safety, and general welfare. 2. Methods Used to Analyze Flood Hazards. This ordinance is based upon a reasonable method of analyzing flood hazards which is consistent with the standards established by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. [C] STATEMENT OF PURPOSE: It is the purpose of this ordinance to promote the public health, safety, and general welfare and to minimize those losses described in Section [B] 1 by provisions contained herein. GENERAL PROVISIONS: MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE 18/1 [A] LANDS TO WHICH ORDINANCE APPLIES: This ordinance shall apply to all lands within the jurisdiction of Monticello shown on the official zoning map and/or attachments thereto as being located within the boundaries of the floodway or flood fringe districts. [B] ESTABLISHMENT OF OFFICIAL ZONING MAP: The official zoning map, together with all materials attached thereto, is hereby adopted by reference and declared to be a part of this ordinance. The attached material shall include the Flood Insurance Study for the city of Monticello prepared by the Federal Insurance Administration dated May 1979, the Flood Boundary and Floodway Map dated November 1979, and the Flood Insurance Rate Map dated November 1979 therein. The official zoning map shall be on file in the office of the City Administrator and the Zoning Administrator. [C] REGULATORY FLOOD PROTECTION ELEVATION: The regulatory flood protection elevation shall be an elevation no lower than one foot above the elevation of the regional flood plus any increases in flood elevation caused by encroachments on the flood plain that result from designation of a floodway. [D] INTERPRETATION: 1. In their interpretation and application, the provisions of this ordinance shall be held to be minimum requirements and shall be liberally construed in favor of the governing body and shall not be deemed a limitation or repeal of any other powers granted by state statutes. 2. The boundaries of the zoning districts shall be determined by scaling distances on the official zoning map. Where interpretation is needed as to the exact location of the boundaries of the district as shown on the official zoning map, as for example where there appears to be a conflict between a mapped boundary and actual field conditions, and there is a formal appeal of the decision of the Zoning Administrator, the Board of Adjustment shall make the necessary interpretation. All decisions will be based on elevations on the regional (100 -year) flood profile and other available technical data. Persons contesting the location of the district boundaries shall be given a reasonable opportunity to present their case to the board and to submit technical evidence. [E] ABROGATION AND GREATER RESTRICTIONS: It is not intended by this ordinance to repeal, abrogate, or impair any existing easements, covenants, or deed restrictions. However, where this ordinance imposes greater restrictions, the provisions of this ordinance shall prevail. All other ordinances inconsistent with this ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of the inconsistency only. [F] WARNING AND DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY: This ordinance does not imply that areas outside the flood plain districts or land uses permitted within MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE 18/2 [G] [H] such districts will be free from flooding or flood damages. This ordinance shall not create liability on the part of the City of Monticello or any officer or employee thereof for any flood damages that result from reliance on this ordinance or any administrative decision lawfully made thereunder. SEVERABILITY: If any section, clause, provision, or portion of this ordinance is adjudged unconstitutional or invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder of this ordinance shall not be affected thereby. DEFINITIONS: Unless specifically defined below, words or phrases used in this ordinance shall be interpreted so as to give them the same meaning as they have in common usage and so as to give this ordinance its most reasonable application. 1. ACCESSORY USE OR STRUCTURE --A use or structure on the same lot with, and of a nature customarily incidental and subordinate to, the principal use or structure. 2. BASEMENT --means any area of a structure, including crawl spaces, having its floor or base subgrade (below ground level) on all four sides, regardless of the depth of excavation below ground level. 3. CONDITIONAL USE --means a specific type of structure or land use listed in the official control that may be allowed but only after an in-depth review procedure and with appropriate conditions or restrictions as provided in the official zoning controls or building codes and upon a finding that: (a) certain conditions as detailed in the zoning ordinance exist, and (b) the structure and/or land use conform to the comprehensive land use plan if one exists and are compatible with the existing neighborhood. 4. EQUAL DEGREE OF ENCROACHMENT --A method of determining the location of floodway boundaries so that flood plain lands on both sides of a stream are capable of conveying a proportionate share of flood flows. 5. FLOOD --A temporary increase in the flow or stage of a stream or in the stage of a wetland or lake that results in the inundation of normally dry areas. 6. FLOOD FREQUENCY --The frequency for which it is expected that a specific flood stage or discharge may be equalled or exceeded. MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE 18/3 7. FLOOD FRINGE --That portion of the flood plain outside of the floodway. Flood fringe is synonymous with the term "floodway fringe" used in the Flood Insurance Study for the city of Monticello. 8. FLOOD PLAIN --The beds proper and the areas adjoining a wetland, lake, or watercourse which have been or hereafter may be covered by the regional flood. 9. FLOOD -PROOFING --A combination of structural provisions, changes, or adjustment to properties and structures subject to flooding, primarily for the reduction or elimination of flood damages. 10. FLOODWAY--The bed of wetland or lake and the channel of a watercourse and those portions of the adjoining flood plain which are reasonably required to carry or store the regional flood discharge. 11. OBSTRUCTION --Any dam, wall, wharf, embankment, levee, dike, pile, abutment, projection, excavation, channel modification, culvert, building, wire, fence, stockpile, refuse, fill, structure, or matter in, along, across, or projecting into any channel, watercourse, or regulatory flood plain which may impede, retard, or change the direction of the flow of water, either in itself or by catching or collecting debris carried by such water. 12. PRINCIPAL USE OR STRUCTURE --means all uses or structures that are not accessory uses or structures. 13. REACH --A hydraulic engineering term to describe a longitudinal segment of a stream or river influenced by a natural or man-made obstruction. In an urban area, the segment of a stream or river between two consecutive bridge crossings would most typically constitute a reach. 14. REGIONAL FLOOD --A flood which is representative of large floods known to have occurred generally in Minnesota and reasonably characteristic of what can be expected to occur on an average frequency in the magnitude of the 100 -year recurrence interval. Regional flood is synonymous with the term "base flood" used in the Flood Insurance Study. 15. REGULATORY FLOOD PROTECTION ELEVATION --The regulatory flood protection elevation shall be an elevation no lower than one foot above the elevation of the regional flood plus any increases in flood elevation caused by encroachments on the flood plain that result from designation of a floodway. 16. STRUCTURE --anything constructed or erected on the ground or attached to the ground or on-site utilities, including, but not limited to, buildings, factories, sheds, detached garages, cabins, manufactured MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE 18/4 homes, travel trailers, vehicles not meeting the exemption criteria specified in Section 9 [C] 1 of the ordinance, and other similar items. 17. VARIANCE --means a modification of a specific permitted development standard required in an official control, including this ordinance, to allow an alternative development standard not stated as acceptable in the official control, but only as applied to a particular property for the purpose of alleviating a hardship, practical difficulty, or unique circumstance as defined and elaborated upon in a community's respective planning and zoning enabling legislation. 18-3: ESTABLISHMENT OF ZONING DISTRICTS: [A] DISTRICTS: 1. FLOODWAY DISTRICT: The floodway district shall include those areas designated as floodway on the flood boundary and floodway map adopted in Section 2 [B]. 2. FLOOD FRINGE DISTRICT: The flood fringe district shall include those areas designated as floodway fringe on the flood boundary and floodway map adopted in Section 2 [B]. [B] COMPLIANCE: No new structure or land shall hereafter be used and no structure shall be located, extended, converted, or structurally altered without full compliance with the terms of this ordinance and other applicable regulations which apply to uses within the jurisdiction of this ordinance. Within the floodway and flood fringe districts, all uses not listed as permitted uses or conditional uses in Sections 4, 5, and 6 that follow, respectively, shall be prohibited. In addition, a caution is provided here that: 1. New manufactured homes, replacement manufactured homes, and certain travel trailers and travel vehicles are subject to the general provisions of this ordinance and specifically Section 9; 2. Modifications, additions, structural alterations, or repair after damage to existing nonconforming structures and nonconforming uses of structures or land are regulated by the general provisions of this ordinance and specifically Section 11; and 3. As -built elevations for elevated or flood -proofed structures must be certified by ground surveys, and flood -proofing techniques must be designed and certified by a registered professional engineer or architect as specified in the general provisions of this ordinance and specifically as stated in Section 10 of this ordinance. 18-4: FLOODWAY DISTRICT (FW) [A] PERMITTED USES: MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE 18/5 1. General farming, pasture, grazing, outdoor plant nurseries, horticulture, truck farming, forestry, sod farming, and wild crop harvesting. 2. Industrial -commercial loading areas, parking areas, and airport landing strips. 3. Private and public golf courses, tennis courts, driving ranges, archery ranges, picnic grounds, boat launching ramps, swimming areas, parks, wildlife and nature preserves, game farms, fish hatcheries, shooting preserves, target ranges, trap and skeet ranges, hunting and fishing areas, and single or multiple purpose recreational trails. 4. Residential lawns, gardens, parking areas, and play areas. [B] STANDARDS FOR FLOODWAY PERMITTED USES: 1. The use shall have a low flood damage potential. 2. The use shall be permissible in the underlying zoning district if one exists. 3. The use shall not obstruct flood flows or increase flood elevations and shall not involve structures, fill, obstructions, excavations, or storage of materials or equipment. [C] CONDITIONAL USES: 1. Structures accessory to the uses listed in 4 [A] above and the uses listed in 4 [C]2 - 4 [C]8 below. 2. Extraction and storage of sand, gravel, and other materials. 3. Marinas, boat rentals, docks, piers, wharves, and water control structures. 4. Railroads, streets, bridges, utility transmission lines, and pipelines. 5. Storage yards for equipment, machinery, or materials. 6. Placement of fill. 7. Travel trailers and travel vehicles either on individual lots of record or in existing or new subdivisions or commercial or condominium type campgrounds, subject to the exemptions and provisions of Section 9 [C] of this ordinance. 8. Structural works for flood control such as levees, dikes, and floodwalls constructed to any height where the intent is to protect individual structures and levees, or dikes where the intent is to protect MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE 18/6 agricultural crops for a frequency flood event equal to or less than the 10 -year frequency flood event. [D] STANDARDS FOR FLOODWAY CONDITIONAL USES: 1. ALL USES. No structure (temporary or permanent), fill (including fill for roads and levees), deposit, obstruction storage of materials or equipment, or other uses may be allowed as a conditional use that will cause any increase in the stage of the 100 -year or regional flood or cause an increase in flood damages in the reach or reaches affected. 2. All floodway conditional uses shall be subject to the procedures and standards contained in Section 10 [D] of this ordinance. 3. The conditional use shall be permissible in the underlying zoning district if one exists. 4. FILL: (a) Fill, dredge spoil, and all other similar materials deposited or stored in the flood plain shall be protected from erosion by vegetative cover, mulching, riprap, or other acceptable method. (b) Dredge spoil sites and sand and gravel operations shall not be allowed in the floodway unless a long-term site development plan is submitted which includes an erosion/sedimentation prevention element to the plan. (c) As an alternative, and consistent with subsection (b) immediately above, dredge spoil disposal and sand and gravel operations may allow temporary, on-site storage of fill or other materials which would have caused an increase to the stage of the 100 -year or regional flood, but only after the governing body has received an appropriate plan which assures the removal of the materials from the floodway based upon the flood warning time available. The conditional use permit must be title registered with the property in the office of the county recorder. 5. ACCESSORY STRUCTURES: (a) Accessory structures shall not be designed for human habitation. (b) Accessory structures, if permitted, shall be constructed and placed on the building site so as to offer the minimum obstruction to the flow of flood waters. MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE 18/7 Whenever possible, structures shall be constructed with the longitudinal axis parallel to the direction of flood flow, and ii. So far as practicable, structures shall be placed approximately on the same flood flow lines as those of adjoining structures. (c) Accessory structures shall be elevated on fill or structurally dry flood -proofed in accordance with the FP -1 or FP -2 flood -proofing classifications in the State Building Code. As an alternative, an accessory structure may be flood -proofed to the FP -3 or FP -4 flood -proofing classification in the State Building Code provided the accessory structure constitutes a minimal investment, does not exceed 500 square feet in size, and for a detached garage, the detached garage must be used solely for parking of vehicles and limited storage. All flood -proofed accessory structures must meet the following additional standards as appropriate: The structure must be adequately anchored to prevent flotation, collapse, or lateral movement of the structure and shall be designed to equalize hydrostatic flood forces on exterior walls; and ii. Any mechanical and utility equipment in a structure must be elevated to or above the regulatory flood protection elevation or properly flood -proofed. 6. STORAGE OF MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT: (a) The storage or processing of materials that are, in time of flooding, flammable, explosive, or potentially injurious to human, animal, or plant life is prohibited. (b) Storage of other materials or equipment may be allowed if readily removable from the area within the time available with a plan approved by the governing body. 7. Structural works for flood control that will change the course, current, or cross section of protected wetlands or public waters shall be subject to the provisions of Minnesota Statute, Chapter 105. Community -wide structural works for flood control intended to remove areas from the regulatory flood plain shall not be allowed in the floodway. 8. A levee, dike, or floodwall constructed in the floodway shall not cause an increase to the 100 -year or regional flood, and the technical MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE 18/8 analysis must assume equal conveyance or storage loss on both sides of a stream. 18-5: FLOOD FRINGE DISTRICT (FF) [A] PERMITTED USES: Permitted uses shall be those uses of land or structures listed as permitted uses in the underlying zoning use district(s). If no pre-existing underlying zoning use districts exist, then any residential or non-residential structure or use of a structure or land shall be a permitted use in the flood fringe provided such use does not constitute a public nuisance. All permitted uses shall comply with the standards for flood fringe "permitted uses" listed in Section 5 [B] and the standards for all flood fringe "permitted and conditional uses" listed in Section 5 [E]. [B] STANDARDS FOR FLOOD FRINGE PERMITTED USES: 1. All structures, including accessory structures, must be elevated on fill so that the lowest floor, including basement floor, is at or above the regulatory flood protection elevation. The finished fill elevation for structures shall be no lower than one (1) foot below the regulatory flood protection elevation, and the fill shall extend at such elevation at least fifteen (15) feet beyond the outside limits of the structure erected thereon. 2. As an alternative to elevation on fill, accessory structures that constitute a minimal investment and that do not exceed 500 square feet for the outside dimension at ground level may be internally flood - proofed in accordance with Section 4 [D]5(c). 3. The cumulative placement of fill where at any one time in excess of one thousand (1,000) cubic yards of fill is located on the parcel shall be allowable only as a conditional use, unless said fill is specifically intended to elevate a structure in accordance with Section [B] 1 of this ordinance. 4. The storage of any materials or equipment shall be elevated on fill to the regulatory flood protection elevation. 5. The provisions of Section 5 [E] of this ordinance shall apply. [C] CONDITIONAL USES: Any structure that is not elevated on fill or flood -proofed in accordance with Section 5 [B] 1 - 5 [B]2, or any use of land that does not comply with the standards in Section 5 [B]3 - 5 [B]4 shall only be allowable as a conditional use. An application for a conditional use shall be subject to the standards and criteria and evaluation procedures specified in Sections 5 [D] - 5 [E] and 10 [D] of this ordinance. MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE 18/9 [D] STANDARDS FOR FLOOD FRINGE CONDITIONAL USES: 1. Alternative elevation methods other than the use of fill may be utilized to elevate a structure's lowest floor above the regulatory flood protection elevation. These alternative methods may include the use of stilts, pilings, parallel walls, etc., or above -grade, enclosed areas such as crawl spaces or tuck -under garages. The base or floor of an enclosed area shall be considered above grade and not a structure's basement or lowest floor if- (a) £ (a) the enclosed area is above grade on at least one side of the structure; (b) is designed to internally flood and is constructed with flood resistant materials; and (c) is used solely for parking of vehicles, building access, or storage. The above -noted alternative elevation methods are subject to the following additional standards: Design and Certification --The structure's design and as -built condition must be certified by a registered professional engineer or architect as being in compliance with the general design standards of the State Building Code and, specifically, that all electrical, heating ventilation, plumbing, and air conditioning equipment and other service facilities must be at or above the regulatory flood protection elevation or be designed to prevent flood water from entering or accumulating within these components during times of flooding. ii. Specific Standards for Above -Grade, Enclosed Areas--Above-grade, fully enclosed areas such as crawl spaces or tuck -under garages must be designed to internally flood, and the design plans must stipulate: (aa) The minimum area of opening in the walls where internal flooding is to be used as a flood -proofing technique. When openings are placed in a structure's walls to provide for entry of flood water to equalize pressures, the bottom of all openings shall be no higher than one foot above grade. Openings may be equipped with screens, louvers, valves, or other coverings or devices provided that they permit the automatic entry and exit of flood water. (bb) That the enclosed area will be designed of flood MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE 18/10 resistant materials in accordance with the FP -3 or FP -4 classifications in the State Building Code and shall be used solely for building access, parking of vehicles, or storage. 2. Basements, as defined by Section 2 [H]2 of this ordinance, shall be subject to the following: (a) Residential basement construction shall not be allowed below the regulatory flood protection elevation. (b) Non-residential basements may be allowed below the regulatory flood protection elevation provided the basement is structurally dry flood -proofed in accordance with Section 5 [D]3 of this ordinance. 3. All other areas of non-residential structures, including basements to be placed below the regulatory flood protection elevation, shall be flood -proofed in accordance with the structurally dry flood -proofing classifications in the State Building Code. Structurally dry flood -proofing must meet the FP -1 or FP -2 flood -proofing classification in the State Building Code, and this shall require making the structure watertight with the walls substantially impermeable to the passage of water and with structural components having the capability of resisting hydrostatic and hydrodynamic loads and the effects of buoyancy. Structures flood -proofed to the FP -3 or FP -4 classification shall not be permitted. 4. When at any one time more than 1,000 cubic yards of fill or other similar material is located on a parcel for such activities as on-site storage, landscaping, sand and gravel operations, landfills, roads, dredge spoil disposal, or construction of flood control works, an erosion/sedimentation control plan must be submitted unless the community is enforcing a state -approved shoreland management ordinance. In the absence of a state -approved shoreland ordinance, the plan must clearly specify methods to be used to stabilize the fill on site for a flood event at a minimum of the 100 -year or regional flood event. The plan must be prepared and certified by a registered professional engineer or other qualified individual acceptable to the governing body. The plan may incorporate alternative procedures for removal of the material from the flood plain if adequate flood warning time exists. 5. STORAGE OF MATERIAL AND EQUIPMENT: (a) The storage or processing of materials that are, in time of flooding, flammable, explosive, or potentially injurious to human, animal, or plant life is prohibited. MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE 18/11 (b) Storage of other materials or equipment may be allowed if readily removable from the area within the time available after a flood warning and in accordance with a plan approved by the governing body. 6. The provisions of Section 5 [E] of this ordinance shall also apply. [E] STANDARDS FOR ALL FLOOD FRINGE USES: 1. All new principal structures must have vehicular access at or above an elevation not more than two (2) feet below the regulatory flood protection elevation. If a variance to this requirement is granted, the Board of Adjustment must specify limitations on the period of use or occupancy of after determining that adequate flood warning time and local flood emergency response procedures exist. 2. COMMERCIAL USES: Accessory land uses such as yards, railroad tracks, and parking lots may be at elevations lower than the regulatory flood protection elevation; however, a permit for such facilities to be used by the employees or the general public shall not be granted in the absence of a flood warning system that provides adequate time for evacuation if the area would be subject to flood velocities greater than four feet per second upon occurrence of the regional flood. 3. MANUFACTURING AND INDUSTRIAL USES: Measures shall be taken to minimize interference with normal plant operations, especially along streams having protracted flood durations. Certain accessory land uses such as yards and parking lots may be at lower elevations subject to requirements set out in Section 5 [E]2 above. In considering permit applications, due consideration shall be given to needs of an industry whose business requires that it be located in flood plain areas. 4. Fill shall be properly compacted and the slopes shall be properly protected by the use of riprap, vegetative cover, or other acceptable method. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has established criteria for removing the special flood hazard area designation for certain structures properly elevated on fill above the 100 -year flood elevation--FEMA'S requirements incorporate specific fill compaction and side slope protection standards for multi -structure or multi -lot developments. These standards should be investigated prior to the initiation of site preparation if a change of special flood hazard area designation will be requested. 5. Flood plain developments shall not adversely affect the hydraulic capacity of the channel and adjoining flood plain of any tributary watercourse or drainage system where a floodway or other encroachment limit has not been specified on the official zoning map. MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE 18/12 6. Standards for travel trailers and travel vehicles are contained in Section 9 [C]. 7. All manufactured homes must be securely anchored to an adequately anchored foundation system that resists flotation, collapse, and lateral movement. Methods of anchoring may include, but are not limited to, use of over -the -top or frame ties to ground anchors. This requirement is in addition to applicable state or local anchoring requirements for resisting wind forces. 18-6: RESERVED FOR FUTURE USE 18-7: SUBDIVISIONS* [A] REVIEW CRITERIA: No land shall be subdivided which is unsuitable for the reason of flooding, inadequate drainage, water supply, or sewage treatment facilities. All lots within the flood plain districts shall contain a building site at or above the regulatory flood protection elevation. All subdivisions shall have water and sewage treatment facilities that comply with the provisions of this ordinance and have road access both to the subdivisions and to the individual building sites no lower than two feet below the regulatory flood protection elevation. For all subdivisions in the flood plain, the floodway and flood fringe boundaries, the regulatory flood protection elevation, and the required elevation of all access roads shall be clearly labeled on all required subdivision drawings and platting documents. [B] REMOVAL OF SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA DESIGNATION: The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has established criteria for removing the special flood hazard area designation for certain structures properly elevated on fill above the 100 -year flood elevation. FEMA'S requirements incorporate specific fill compaction and side slope protection standards for multi -structure or multi -lot developments. These standards should be investigated prior to the initiation of site preparation if a change of special flood hazard area designation will be requested. 18-8: PUBLIC UTILITIES, RAILROADS, ROADS, AND BRIDGES: [A] PUBLIC UTILITIES: All public utilities and facilities such as gas, electrical, sewer, and water supply systems to be located in the flood plain shall be flood -proofed in accordance with the State Building Code or elevated to above the regulatory flood protection elevation. [B] PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES: Railroad tracks, roads, and bridges to be located within the flood plain shall comply with Sections 4 and 5 of this ordinance. Elevation to the regulatory flood protection elevation shall be provided where failure or interruption of these transportation facilities would result in danger to the public health or safety or where such facilities are essential to the orderly functioning of the area. Minor or MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE 18/13 auxiliary roads or railroads may be constructed at a lower elevation where failure or interruption of transportation services would not endanger the public health or safety. [C] ON-SITE SEWAGE TREATMENT AND WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS: Where public utilities are not provided. 1. On-site water supply systems must be designed to minimize or eliminate infiltration of flood waters into the systems; and 2. New or replacement on-site sewage treatment systems must be designed to minimize or eliminate infiltration of flood waters into the systems and discharges from the systems into flood waters, and they shall not be subject to impairment or contamination during times of flooding. Any sewage treatment system designed in accordance with the state's current statewide standards for on-site sewage treatment systems shall be determined to be in compliance with this section. 18-9: MANUFACTURED HOMES AND MANUFACTURED HOME PARKS AND PLACEMENT OF TRAVEL TRAILERS AND TRAVEL VEHICLES: [A] New manufactured home parks and expansions to existing mobile manufactured home parks shall be subject to the provisions placed on subdivisions by Section 7 of this ordinance. [B] The placement of new or replacement manufactured homes in existing manufactured home parks or on individual lots of record that are located in flood plain districts will be treated as a new structure and may be placed only if elevated in compliance with Section 5 of this ordinance. If vehicular road access for pre-existing manufactured home parks is not provided in accordance with Section 5 [E] 1, then replacement manufactured homes will not be allowed until the property owner(s) develops a flood warning emergency plan acceptable to the governing body. *This section is not intended as a substitute for a comprehensive city or county subdivision ordinance. It can, however, be used as an interim control until the comprehensive subdivision ordinance can be amended to include necessary flood plain management provisions. 1. All manufactured homes must be securely anchored to an adequately anchored foundation system that resists flotation, collapse, and lateral movement. Methods of anchoring may include, but are not to be limited to, use of over -the -top or frame ties to ground anchors. This requirement is in addition to applicable state or local anchoring requirements for resisting wind forces. [C] Travel trailers and travel vehicles that do not meet the exemption criteria specified in Section 9 [C] 1 below shall be subject to the provisions of this MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE 18/14 ordinance and as specifically spelled out in Sections 9 [C]3 - 9 [C]4 below: 1. EXEMPTION: Travel trailers and travel vehicles are exempt from the provisions of this ordinance if they are placed in any of the areas listed in Section 9 [C]2 below and further, they meet the following criteria: (a) Have current licenses required for highway use. (b) Are highway ready meaning on wheels or the internal jacking system, are attached to the site only by quick disconnect type utilities commonly used in campgrounds and trailer parks, and travel trailer/travel vehicle has no permanent structural type additions attached to it. (c) The travel trailer or travel vehicle and associated use must be permissible in any pre-existing, underlying zoning use district. 3. Travel trailers and travel vehicles exempted in Section 9 [C] 1 lose this exemption when development occurs on the parcel exceeding One Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00) for a structural addition to the travel trailer/travel vehicle or an accessory structure such as a garage or storage building. The travel trailer/travel vehicle and all additions and accessory structures will then be treated as a new structure and shall be subject to the elevation/flood-proofing requirements and the use of land restrictions specified in Sections 4 and 5 of this ordinance. 4. New commercial travel trailer or travel vehicle parks or campgrounds and new residential type subdivisions and condominium associations and the expansion of any existing similar use exceeding five (5) units or dwelling sites shall be subject to the following: (a) Any new or replacement travel trailer or travel vehicle will be allowed in the floodway or flood fringe districts provided said trailer or vehicle and its contents are placed on fill above the regulatory flood protection elevation and proper elevated road access to the site exists in accordance with Section 5 [E] 1 of this ordinance. Any fill placed in a floodway for the purpose of elevating a travel trailer shall be subject to the requirements of Section 4. (b) All new or replacement travel trailers or travel vehicles not meeting the criteria of (a) above may, as an alternative, be allowed as a conditional use if in accordance with the following provisions and the provisions of 10 [D] of the ordinance. The applicant must submit an emergency plan for the safe evacuation of all vehicles and people during the 100 -year flood. Said plan shall be prepared by a registered engineer or other qualified individual and shall demonstrate that adequate time and personnel exist to carry out the MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE 18/15 evacuation. All attendant sewage and water facilities for new or replacement travel trailers or other recreational vehicles must be protected or constructed so as to not be impaired or contaminated during times of flooding in accordance with Section 8 [C] of this ordinance. 18-10: ADMINISTRATION: [A] ZONING ADMINISTRATOR: A Zoning Administrator designated by the governing body shall administer and enforce this ordinance. If the Zoning Administrator finds a violation of the provisions of this ordinance, the Zoning Administrator shall notify the person responsible for such violation in accordance with the procedures stated in Section 12 of the ordinance. [B] PERMIT REQUIREMENTS: 1. Permit Required. A permit issued by the Zoning Administrator in conformity with the provisions of this ordinance shall be secured prior to the erection, addition, or alteration of any building, structure, or portion thereof, prior to the use or change of use of a building, structure, or land; prior to the change or extension of a non -conforming use; and prior to the placement of fill, excavation of materials, or the storage of materials or equipment within the flood plain. 2. Application for Permit. Application for a permit shall be made in duplicate to the Zoning Administrator on forms furnished by the Zoning Administrator and shall include the following where applicable: plans in duplicate drawn to scale showing the nature, location, dimensions, and elevations of the lot; existing or proposed structures, fill, or storage of materials; and the location of the foregoing in relation to the stream channel. 3. State and Federal Permits. Prior to granting a permit or processing an application for a conditional use permit or variance, the Zoning Administrator shall determine that the applicant has obtained all necessary state and federal permits. 4. Certificate of Zoning Compliance for a New, Altered, or Nonconforming Use. It shall be unlawful to use, occupy, or permit the use or occupancy of any building or premises or part thereof hereafter created, erected, changed, converted, altered, or enlarged in its use or structure until a Certificate of Zoning Compliance shall have been issued by the Zoning Administrator stating that the use of the building or land conforms to the requirements of this ordinance. 5. Construction and Use to be as Provided on Applications, Plans, Permits, Variances, and Certificates of Zoning Compliance. Permits, conditional use permits, or Certificates of Zoning Compliance issued MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE 18/16 on the basis of approved plans and applications authorize only the use, arrangement, and construction set forth in such approved plans and applications, and no other use, arrangement, or construction. Any use, arrangement, or construction at variance with that authorized shall be deemed a violation of this ordinance and punishable as provided by Section 12 of this ordinance. 6. Certification. The applicant shall be required to submit certification by a registered professional engineer, registered architect, or registered land surveyor that the finished fill and building elevations were accomplished in compliance with the provisions of this ordinance. Flood -proofing measures shall be certified by a registered professional engineer or registered architect. 7. Record of First Floor Elevation. The Zoning Administrator shall maintain a record of the elevation of the lowest floor (including basement) of all new structures and alterations or additions to existing structures in the flood plain. The Zoning Administrator shall also maintain a record of the elevation to which structures and alterations or additions to structures are flood proofed. [C] BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT: 1. Rules. The Board of Adjustment shall adopt rules for the conduct of business and may exercise all of the powers conferred on such boards by state law. 2. Administrative Review. The Board shall hear and decide appeals where it is alleged there is error in any order, requirement, decision, or determination made by an administrative official in the enforcement or administration of this ordinance. 3. Variances. The Board may authorize upon appeal in specific cases such relief or variance from the terms of this ordinance as will not be contrary to the public interest and only for those circumstances such as hardship, practical difficulties, or circumstances unique to the property under consideration as provided for in the respective enabling legislation for planning and zoning for cities or counties as appropriate. In the granting of such variance, the Board of Adjustment shall clearly identify in writing the specific conditions that existed consistent with the criteria specified in the respective enabling legislation which justified the granting of the variance. No variance shall have the effect of allowing in any district uses prohibited in that district, permit a lower degree of flood protection than the regulatory flood protection elevation for the particular area, or permit standards lower than those required by state law. 4. Hearings. Upon filing with the Board of Adjustment of an appeal from a decision of the Zoning Administrator or an application for a variance, the Board shall fix a reasonable time for a hearing and give MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE 18/17 due notice to the parties in interest as specified by law. The Board shall submit by mail to the Commissioner of Natural Resources a copy of the application for proposed variances sufficiently in advance so that the Commissioner will receive at least ten days' notice of the hearing. 5. Decisions. The Board shall arrive at a decision on such appeal or variance within 90 days. In passing upon an appeal, the Board may, so long as such action is in conformity with the provisions of this ordinance, reverse or affirm, wholly or in part, or modify the order, requirement, decision, or determination of the Zoning Administrator or other public official. It shall make its decision in writing setting forth the findings of fact and the reasons for its decisions. In granting a variance, the Board may prescribe appropriate conditions and safeguards such as those specified in Section 10 [D]6, which are in conformity with the purposes of this ordinance. Violations of such conditions and safeguards, when made a part of the terms under which the variance is granted, shall be deemed a violation of this ordinance punishable under Section 12. A copy of all decisions granting variances shall be forwarded by mail to the Commissioner of Natural Resources within ten (10) days of such action. 6. Appeals. Appeals from any decision of the Board may be made and as specified in this community's official controls and also Minnesota Statutes. 7. Flood Insurance Notice and Record Keeping. The Zoning Administrator shall notify the applicant for a variance that: (a) The issuance of a variance to construct a structure below the base flood level will result in increased premium rates for flood insurance up to amounts as high as $25 for $100 of insurance coverage, and (b) Such construction below the 100 -year or regional flood level increases risks to life and property. Such notification shall be maintained with a record of all variance actions. A community shall maintain a record of all variance actions, including justification for their issuance, and report such variances issued in its annual or biennial report submitted to the Administrator of the National Flood Insurance Program. [D] CONDITIONAL USES: The City Council shall hear and decide applications for conditional uses permissible under this ordinance. Applications shall be submitted to the Zoning Administrator, who shall forward the application to the City Council for consideration. 1. Hearings. Upon filing with the City Council an application for a MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE 18/18 conditional use permit, the City Council shall submit by mail to the Commissioner of Natural Resources a copy of the application for proposed conditional use sufficiently in advance so that the Commissioner will receive at least ten days' notice of the hearing. 2. Decisions. The City Council shall arrive at a decision on a conditional use within 90 days. In granting a conditional use permit, the City Council shall prescribe appropriate conditions and safeguards in addition to those specified in Section 10 [D]6, which are in conformity with the purposes of this ordinance. Violations of such conditions and safeguards, when made a part of the terms under which the conditional use permit is granted, shall be deemed a violation of this ordinance punishable under Section 12. A copy of all decisions granting conditional use permits shall be forwarded by mail to the Commissioner of Natural Resources within ten (10) days of such action. 3. Procedures to be followed by the City Council in passing on conditional use permit applications within all flood plain districts: (a) Require the applicant to furnish such of the following information and additional information as deemed necessary by the City Council for determining the suitability of the particular site for the proposed use: Plans in triplicate drawn to scale showing the nature, location, dimensions, and elevation of the lot, existing or proposed structures, fill, storage of materials, flood -proofing measures, and the relationship of the above to the location of the stream channel. ii. Specifications for building construction and materials, flood -proofing, filling, dredging, grading, channel improvement, storage of materials, water supply, and sanitary facilities. (b) Transmit one copy of the information described in subsection (a) to a designated engineer or other expert person or agency for technical assistance, where necessary, in evaluating the proposed project in relation to flood heights and velocities, the seriousness of flood damage to the use, the adequacy of the plans for protection, and other technical matters. (c) Based upon the technical evaluation of the designated engineer or expert, the City Council shall determine the specific flood hazard at the site and evaluate the suitability of the proposed use in relation to the flood hazard. 4. Factors Upon Which the Decision of the City Council Shall be Based. MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE 18/19 In passing upon conditional use applications, the City Council shall consider all relevant factors specified in other sections of this ordinance, and: (a) The danger to life and property due to increased flood heights or velocities caused by encroachments. (b) The danger that materials may be swept onto other lands or downstream to the injury of others or they may block bridges, culverts, or other hydraulic structures. (c) The proposed water supply and sanitation systems and the ability of these systems to prevent disease, contamination, and unsanitary conditions. (d) The susceptibility of the proposed facility and its contents to flood damage and the effect of such damage on the individual owner. (e) The importance of the services provided by the proposed facility to the community. (f) The requirements of the facility for a waterfront location. (g) The availability of alternative locations not subject to flooding for the proposed use. (h) The compatibility of the proposed use with existing development and development anticipated in the foreseeable future. (i) The relationship of the proposed use to the comprehensive plan and flood plain management program for the area. (j) The safety of access to the property in times of flood for ordinary and emergency vehicles. (k) The expected heights, velocity, duration, rate of rise, and sediment transport of the flood waters expected at the site. (1) Such other factors which are relevant to the purposes of this ordinance. 5. Time for Acting on Application. The City Council shall act on an application in the manner described above within 90 days from receiving the application, except that where additional information is required pursuant to 10 [D]4 of this ordinance, the City Council shall render a written decision within 60 days from the receipt of such additional information. MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE 18/20 6. Conditions Attached to Conditional Use Permits. Upon consideration of the factors listed above and the purpose of this ordinance, the City Council shall attach such conditions to the granting of conditional use permits as it deems necessary to fulfill the purposes of this ordinance. Such conditions may include, but are not limited to, the following: (a) Modification of waste treatment and water supply facilities. (b) Limitations on period of use, occupancy, and operation. (c) Imposition of operational controls, sureties, and deed restrictions. (d) Requirements for construction of channel modifications, compensatory storage, dikes, levees, and other protective measures. (e) Flood -proofing measures in accordance with the State Building Code and this ordinance. The applicant shall submit a plan or document certified by a registered professional engineer or architect that the flood -proofing measures are consistent with the regulatory flood protection elevation and associated flood factors for the particular area. 18-11: NON -CONFORMING USES: [A] A structure or the use of a structure or premises which was lawful before the passage or amendment of this ordinance but which is not in conformity with the provisions of this ordinance may be continued subject to the following conditions: 1. No such use shall be expanded, changed, enlarged, or altered in a way which increases its non -conformity. 2. Any alteration or addition to a non -conforming structure or non -conforming use which would result in increasing the flood damage potential of that structure or use shall be protected to the regulatory flood protection elevation in accordance with any of the elevation on fill or flood -proofing techniques (i.e., FP -1 thru FP -4 flood -proofing classifications) allowable in the State Building Code, except as further restricted in 11 [A]3 below. 3. The cost of any structural alterations or additions to any non -conforming structure over the life of the structure shall not exceed 50 percent of the market value of the structure unless the conditions of this section are satisfied. The cost of all structural MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE 18/21 alterations and additions constructed since the adoption of the community's initial flood plain controls must be calculated into today's current cost, which will include all costs such as construction materials and a reasonable cost placed on all manpower or labor. If the current cost of all previous and proposed alterations and additions exceeds 50 percent of the current market value of the structure, then the structure must meet the standards of Section 4 or 5 of this ordinance for new structures depending upon whether the structure is in the floodway or flood fringe, respectively. 4. If any non -conforming use is discontinued for 12 consecutive months, any future use of the building premises shall conform to this ordinance. The assessor shall notify the Zoning Administrator in writing of instances of non -conforming uses which have been discontinued for a period of 12 months. 5. If any non -conforming use or structure is destroyed by any means, including floods, to an extent of 50 percent or more of its market value at the time of destruction, it shall not be reconstructed except in conformity with the provisions of this ordinance. The applicable provisions for establishing new uses or new structures in Sections 4 or 5 will apply depending upon whether the use or structure is in the floodway or flood fringe district, respectively. 18-12: PENALTIES FOR VIOLATION: [A] Violation of the provisions of this ordinance or failure to comply with any of its requirements (including violations of conditions and safeguards established in connection with grants of variances or conditional uses) shall constitute a misdemeanor and shall be punishable as defined by law. [B] Nothing herein contained shall prevent the City of Monticello from taking such other lawful action as is necessary to prevent or remedy any violation. Such actions may include but are not limited to: 1. In responding to a suspected ordinance violation, the Zoning Administrator and local government may utilize the full array of enforcement action available to it, including, but not limited to, prosecution and fines, injunctions, after -the -fact permits, orders for corrective measures, or a request to the National Flood Insurance Program for denial of flood insurance availability to the guilty parry. The community must act in good faith to enforce these official controls and to correct ordinance violations to the extent possible so as not to jeopardize its eligibility in the National Flood Insurance Program. 2. When an ordinance violation is either discovered by or brought to the attention of the Zoning Administrator, the Zoning Adminstrator shall immediately investigate the situation and document the nature and extent of the violation of the official control. As soon as is reasonably possible, this information will be submitted to the MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE 18/22 appropriate Department of Natural Resources and Federal Emergency Management Agency Regional Office along with the community's plan of action to correct the violation to the degree possible. 3. The Zoning Administrator shall notify the suspected party of the requirements of this ordinance and all other official controls and the nature and extent of the suspected violation of these controls. If the structure and/or use is under construction or development, the Zoning Administrator may order the construction or development immediately halted until a proper permit or approval is granted by the community. If the construction or development is already completed, then the Zoning Administrator may either (1) issue an order identifying the corrective actions that must be made within a specified time period to bring the use or structure into compliance with the official controls, or (2) notify the responsible party to apply for an after--the-fact permit/development approval within a specified period of time not to exceed 30 days. 4. If the responsible party does not appropriately respond to the Zoning Administrator within the specified period of time, each additional day that lapses shall constitute an additional violation of this ordinance and shall be prosecuted accordingly. The Zoning Administrator shall also, upon the lapse of the specified response period, notify the landowner to restore the land to the condition which existed prior to the violation of this ordinance. 18-3: AMENDMENTS: [A] The flood plain designation on the official zoning map shall not be removed from flood plain areas unless it can be shown that the designation is in error or that the area has been filled to or above the elevation of the regional flood and is contiguous to lands outside the flood plain. Special exceptions to this rule may be permitted by the Commissioner of Natural Resources if he determines that, through other measures, lands are adequately protected for the intended use. [B] All amendments to this ordinance, including amendments to the official zoning map, must be submitted to and approved by the Commissioner of Natural Resources prior to adoption. Changes in the official zoning map must meet the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) technical conditions and criteria and must receive prior FEMA approval before adoption. The Commissioner of Natural Resources must be given 10 days' written notice of all hearings to consider an amendment to this ordinance, and said notice shall include a draft of the ordinance amendment or technical study under consideration. (#189, 5/14/90) MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE 18/23 MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE 18/24 DIVR i Waters Definitions floodplain: Any normally dry land area susceptible to surface -water flooding. 100 -year flood: A flood that has a 1 - percent chance of being equaled or ex- ceeded in any year. floodway: The river channel and that portion of the floodplain required to pass 100 -year floodwaters without increasing the water surface elevation more than a designated height (6 inches in Minnesota) flood fringe: The portions of the 100 -year floodplain outside the floodway but still subject to flooding. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA): Agency whose mission is to reduce loss of life and property and protect critical infrastructure from hazards. Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM): The official map on which FEMA has delineated the areas of special flood hazards. It is used to determine flood insurance premiums. What are floodplains? Floodplains are areas susceptible to flooding that are adjacent to rivers, streams, and lakes. In flat areas, the floodplain can extend more than a mile from the flooding source. Floodplains can also be the normally dry areas adjacent to wetlands, small ponds, or other low areas that cannot drain as quickly as the rain falls. A smaller area might be covered by floods every other year, on average (50 -percent chance or 2 -year floodplain), but a larger area will be covered by the flood that has a 0.2 -percent chance of happening in a given year (the 500 -year flood). The 1 -percent chance (or 100 -year) flood is the standard for Minnesota and federal minimum regulations. There is a 1 -percent chance of this flood level being equaled or exceeded in any given year. The 100 -year floodplain is the land adjoining lakes and rivers that would be covered by the 1 -percent chance (or 100 - year) flood. Along large rivers, like the Mississippi River or Red River of the North, floodplains usually are flooded during spring after heavy snow seasons. On these and other floodplains, flooding can also result from intense rains. In fact, climatologists have seen a trend toward a greater percentage of the total annual precipitation coming during the intense rains that can cause flooding. In areas with small streams or ponds, flooding can occur within hours of the intense rain. On the larger rivers and lakes, there may be days of warning. How are floodplains managed? Local units of government identify permitted land uses through zoning regulations. Floodplain management regulations are also administered by local zoning authorities. If you want information about permitted land uses on a floodplain within the municipal boundary, check with your city zoning authority. If you are in a rural area, check with your county zoning office. DNR Waters and Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) staffs may assist local officials, especially on complicated issues, but the permitting decisions are made locally. Special Flood Hazard Areas (SFHA): Areas in a community that have been If your community has a FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) that identified on FEMA maps as susceptible to shows flood -prone areas, your community should have enrolled in the a 100 -year flood. National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) and adopted zoning regulations to National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP): Program under which communi- ties are eligible for federal flood insurance if they enroll in the NFIP and administer floodplain management regulations. Information Links Series of information sheets related to floodplain management: www.dnr.state.mn.us/Dublications/waters Flood insurance information: www.floodsmart.,aov FEMA website: www.fema.aov September 2006 Page I of 2 manage land uses in the mapped floodplain. The community's floodplain management regulations must include the minimum federal and state regulations, but can be more restrictive. Most communities adopt a state model that has incorporated the minimum federal and state regulations. The minimum federal and state regulations are enforced in the 1 -percent chance (100 - year) floodplain that is mapped on the FIRM for the community. Local zoning regulations also identify permitted land uses in the floodway and flood fringe portions of the 1 -percent chance (100 -year) floodplain. In the floodway portion, high -velocity floodwaters are expected so most types of development are prohibited. In the flood fringe portion of the floodplain, where the backwater or low-velocity floodwaters occur, development is allowed if it meets standards such as elevating on fill or floodproofing to reduce damage when there is a flood. Check with your local zoning authority to find out which floodplains are regulated. Local zoning authorities often have more restrictive regulations than the federal and state minimum. They might regulate activities in the 500 -year floodplain, instead of Sample FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM). Flood insurance is required in shaded areas. Flood insurance is available for any location in or out of the shaded area if the community is a participant in the National Flood Insurance Program. Sometimes areas above the flood elevation are shown as flood prone on these maps. This is usually due to lack of detailed elevation information to accurately locate bound- aries of the floodplain. FEMA has processes (letter of map amendment; letter of map revision based on fill) to apply for corrections to the map when better information is available for the site. DNR Contact Information Minnesota DNR Waters website lists Area Hydrologists: www.dnr.state.mn.us/waters DNR Waters in St. Paul: 500 Lafayette Road DEPARTYERTOF St. Paul, MN 55155-4032 NAiUPALPESCURCE S (651) 259-5700 September 2006 dust the 1 -percent chance (100 -year) floodplain, especially for essential services such as hospitals, fire stations, and prisons, or for locating hazardous waste sites. They also may have a local water plan that identifies the local ponds and low spots that would be flooded as a result of an intense rain and may require houses to stay above those areas. The FEMA maps usually show floodplains associated with rivers, streams, and large lakes, but the community may also regulate these locally identified areas as high flooding risks. Flood insurance requirements If you intend to obtain a loan from a federally regulated lender (like most mortgage lenders), the lender MUST require you to have flood insurance if your home is in the Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA)—the 1 -percent chance (100 -year) floodplain. Lenders face penalties and fines if properties in these areas mapped as flood prone are not covered by a flood insurance policy. If your community is enrolled in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), you can buy flood insurance. More than 93 percent of Minnesotans are in communities participating in the NFIP and can buy flood insurance. A common myth is that you can only buy flood insurance if you are in the floodplain on the FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps. The fact is that anyone in a participating community can buy flood insurance, and that the flood insurance is much less expen- sive if you are not in a floodplain mapped by FEMA. DNR Information Center Twin Cities: (651) 296-6157 Minnesota toll free: 1-888-646-6367 Telecommunication device for the deaf (TDD): (651) 296-5484 TDD toll free: 1-800-657-3929 This information is available in an alternative format on request. Equal opportunity to participate in and benefit from programs of the Minne- sota Department of Natural Resources is available regardless of race, color, national origin, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, status with regard to public assistance, age, or disability. Discrimination inquiries should be sent to Minnesota DNR, 500 Lafayette Road, St. Paul, MN 55155-4031; or the Equal Opportunity Office, Department of the Interior, Washington, DC 20240. Page 2 of 2 City Council Agenda — 06/25/2018 20. Consideration of approving a Development Stage Planned Unit Development for a 47 -unit, 4 story apartment complex in the CCD (Central Communitv District) Applicant: Pat Briggs/Briggs Companies. (NAC/AS) Property: Legal: Lots 1-3, Block 36, Original Plat Address: 213 Yd Street West Planning Case Number: 2018-008 A. REFERENCE & BACKGROUND Request(s): Development Stage PUD and rezoning to PUD for 4 - story, 47 unit multiple family building; since the time of the publication/mailing of notice the applicant has modified the unit count to 47 units from 44 units. Deadline for Decision: July 31st, 2018 (Extended 60 -days) Land Use Designation: Downtown Zoning Designation: CCD, Central Community District (Walnut/Cedar Character Area) The purpose of the "CCD", Central Community District, is to provide for a wide variety of land uses, transportation options, and public activities in the downtown Monticello area, and particularly to implement the goals, objectives, and specific directives of the Comprehensive Plan, and in particular, the Monticello Downtown Small Area Plan report. Overlays/Environmental Regulations Applicable: NA Current Site Use: Vacant Surrounding Land Uses: North: Mixed Use Commercial/Residential East: Commercial/Professional Office South: Commercial Retail West: Mixed Low Density Residential Project Description: The applicant proposes to develop the subject property, a .76 acre parcel, for multiple family residential uses via rezoning to Planned Unit Development (PUD). The proposed building is 4 stories in height, with a base City Council Agenda — 06/25/2018 level of underground parking, a surface parking lot, and the development of additional on -street parking around the site. General Requirements: The project was presented as a concept sketch to a joint meeting of the Planning Commission and City Council earlier this year. The comments from City officials and staff are summarized as follows: • Land use (residential) was found to be consistent with the Small Area Plan. • Height is generally consistent with Small Area Plan, which would accommodate 3-5 story buildings. • Parking will be scrutinized closely — concerns over existing parking issues on the block, as well as on adjoining private property. • Concerns were expressed about materials and proximity to adjoining property. • Additional green space and separation from adjoining properties was a potential issue. • Several potential engineering issues were identified for more extensive review with Development Stage consideration. • Density was an issue for some, with a minority view expressing a desire for medium density housing on the site. The applicant made some adjustments to the plan following the concept review as a part of the Development Stage PUD application. The applicant requested tabling of the request and continuation of the public hearing in May to further address concept and staff comments. The applicant and applicant's engineer provided response to staff's comments as related to the first Development Stage plan submittal, which are attached for reference as Exhibit Z. The total unit count has been amended slightly to 47 units. The underground garage would accommodate 33 covered parking stalls, with an additional 35 surface spaces on-site. The applicant's plan shows a further 12 spaces of on -street angled parking (8 along 3rd Street and 4 along Locust Street). Side setbacks from the east boundary and Locust Street have been increased from the previous 5 feet to 10 feet and 11 feet, respectively. The site and building plans have been modified slightly to accommodate an interior trash room that would be accessed through the surface parking at the west side of the parking lot. Land Use/Compatibility. The Small Area Plan, which is an adopted appendix of the Land Use Chapter, envisions development that is able to occur in small to medium investments in quarter -block increments, such as proposed. The plan's text and visual illustration support the development of a residential project at this corner. One of the primary W, City Council Agenda — 06/25/2018 framework goals for the Walnut & Cedar Character Area in which the proposed project is located is "In -fill neighborhoods extend to Walnut and Cedar Street with new infill housing of 2-4 stories (apartments and townhouses)". The Small Area Plan calls for a mix of commercial and housing along Walnut, with a greater focus on mid- to high density housing throughout the area. In specific design standards within the plan, it suggests that such housing may include buildings of up to five stories in height. In this regard, the proposal is consistent with the land use framework for its location. Excerpts of the Monticello Comprehensive Plan and Small Area Plan are included for Council's reference. Parking. As noted above, parking is of significant concern in the area. Neighbors to the site in question have cited either lack of available parking for current development, or non - customer parking utilizing other private parking facilities. The proposed facility consists of 47 units — 19 one -bedroom units and 25 two- bedroom units, with an additional 3 studio units. As noted, the applicant is proposing an underground garage of 33 parking spaces, along with 35 surface spaces. The applicant's plans also propose 12 on -street angled spaces to be constructed with the project. While parking in the downtown area is most efficiently designed when there are shared opportunities, residential parking needs to supply its full complement on- site (without relying on street parking) to ensure successful housing development. The issue in this regard is what that full complement should consist of. The City's zoning ordinance recommends a general standard supply of 2.5 spaces per unit, which would require 117 parking spaces for this project. In a follow-up to a question posed by the Planning Commission, the CCD Residential Overlay District recommends 1.5 spaces per unit, of which half are required to be covered. Applying that standard, a requirement of 70.5 spaces would be necessary, 33 of which would have to be covered. The proposed project, with 68 spaces and 33 covered, would not meet the requirement for total parking spaces available based on the Residential Overlay itself. However, for additional reference, staff has reviewed a number of additional resources to determine an applicable parking requirement for this use. The Institute for Transportation Engineers (ITE) is one of the primary resources for traffic and parking generation studies. The recent ITE reference materials examine parking accumulation for a wide variety of land uses, calling out suburban low/mid rise apartments (up to 4-5 stories) as a distinct use. For these uses, the ITE studies show an 85th percentile parking demand of 1.46 spaces per unit, and for suburban projects, a demand of 0.9 spaces per bedroom. These projections would recommend a total of 68 spaces (on a per unit basis) or 65 spaces on a per bedroom basis. 3 City Council Agenda — 06/25/2018 These numbers would suggest that the proposed supply of 68 off-street spaces should be adequate, presuming two factors: 1. All of the off-street spaces are available to the tenants (that is, the spaces are included in rent, and as such, tenants cannot "opt out" of utilizing them); and 2. The on -street angled spaces are constructed to supply visitor parking during days, and when no late-night parking restrictions impact tenant use. In approving the Development Stage PUD as proposed, the City would determine the appropriate amount of parking applicable to this use under the PUD zoning requirements is 68 off-street spaces, as shown. As noted, staff believes that the entire requirement of tenant -generated parking should occur on-site to ensure that the residential use of the site is accommodated, and that such parking does not impact other neighboring property. The applicant notes that the underground parking will be fully available to avoid some of the spaces going un -rented, and from overflowing on- site parking onto the street or other areas. Building Design. The proposed building plans are shown in illustrations, with more detailed materials and data supplied with the narrative portion of the application. The general design shows a hipped -roof four-story building with some gables over the enclosed porches serving the various units. The lower level shows a brick or cultured stone wainscot treatment, with what is understood to be lapped siding above. The cultured stone is described as covering the street and parking lot sides (south, west, and north) up to eight feet, and up to four feet on the east side. The lapped siding portion is identified as steel, with various complementary trim materials. Staff believes that additional brick/stone treatment would benefit the building, and meet the intent of the PUD requirements for superior design and amenities. In addition, the brick/stone should be illustrated to extend to the ground level where the grade drops across the site. While the applicants have reconfigured the site plan to increase the setback to the east, building architectural details should be enhanced for that exposure. In this regard, the applicants have been addressing additional materials details with staff, and it is expected that the brick exposures will be expanded as the design evolves. Additional information would be helpful to properly evaluate whether the building meets the City's expectations for PUD design, as well as for EDA financial participation. The City's application materials typically include full architectural elevations of all sides, including details of height and materials. The supplemental submission materials help to illustrate the architectural intent, but as noted, more full information would be valuable. L! City Council Agenda — 06/25/2018 Access and Circulation. The site is accessed from Locust Street, into a parking lot which terminates at the east end of the property. At the east end, a ramp angles downward to the underground garage. The primary comment relating to circulation would be the parking spaces adjacent to the building. For the space next to the underground ramp access (the easternmost parking space), there should be some room for door swing and vehicle access. Shifting this row of parking slightly to the west, by 3-4 feet, would accommodate this access. The ramp itself should likely have a railing along the top of the wall for safety. The applicant should be prepared to verify that the angle of the ramp can be accessed with typical passenger vehicles, both for turning movements, slope, and "break -over" angles at top and bottom of the ramp. Landscaping. The applicants have provided an updated landscaping plan which incorporates street tree planting along Locust Street, and one street tree along Yd Street. Additional overstory tree planting is shown on the private property area of the site plan. Extensive planting beds of shrubs and perennial forbs and grasses are shown around the building foundation and at the east end of the parking lot. The parking lot itself has been shifted allow a buffer and planting area of evergreen and deciduous shrubs between the surface parking and the neighboring parking area to the north. The Zoning Ordinance provides for the following planting quantities for multiple family projects: 16.0 ACI of canopy trees (including at least 3 evergreen trees) per acre + at least 2 shrubs per each 10 feet of building perimeter. This site is .76 acres in area, and the proposed building is approximately 484 feet of building perimeter. As such, the planting requirements would be 12 caliper inches of canopy trees and 98 shrubs. The applicant has shown 11 overstory trees. If planted at 2" caliper size, the total tree planting would exceed the requirement. The plan further shows 84 shrubs and 74 perennial plants, also exceeding the minimum requirement. As now designed, the plan shows significantly increased shrub planting in the foundation space, and elimination of some of the lawn grass areas. After discussions with staff, the applicant has shifted the parking lot away from the north property line to accommodate a narrow shrub planting. As a final recommendation, staff would suggest the addition of an ornamental fence, such as simulated wrought iron or similar treatment. Extending this fence and shrub line to surround the parking lot along the full length of the north and east boundaries 5 City Council Agenda — 06/25/2018 would help beautify what is a relatively stark paved environment, and delineate the parking area, discouraging non-resident parking overflow from the adjoining lot, as well as to discourage tenant parking off-site. With these additional tree and shrub planting areas, the requirements of the ordinance are met. It should be noted that staff's recommendation for a fence and landscape buffer is intended to separate, but not necessarily fully screen, the site from adjoining property. Lighting. Lighting information has been included with the plan set. The plans submitted show downcast wall lighting only, with no freestanding pole lighting. A photometric plan has been provided and the applicant shall revise the site lighting to meet the ordinance requirements which allow for no more than 0.5 foot-candles of illumination at the property line. In addition to the wall lighting, the applicant's illustrations include an anticipated streetscape improvement which reflects the City's Walnut Street improvements, including lighting standards. The applicant should work with staff to determine the locations for that lighting. Signage. Signage information has not been included with the plan set in part. The plans show a ground sign identifying the building. The plan is a concept at this time, with no specific dimensions. The sign would be located near the entrance driveway within the landscaped area. The CCD Transitional Area allows monument signs to be a maximum of 6 feet in height. More detail as to size and materials will be required for final stage approval. Grading, Drainage, and Utilities. The City engineer will comment separately on grading, drainage, and utility services. It should be noted that the applicant has received preliminary comments from the City Engineer and has provided response comments, which are included for reference. Comments resulting from the secondary review of revised and resubmitted civil plans are detailed in the City Engineer's memo dated May 30th, 2018. Accessory Use Requirements. Trash Handling. Trash is handled in an interior trash room accessible from the parking lot in the west end of the site. Accessory Buildings. No accessory buildings are proposed for the site. G City Council Agenda — 06/25/2018 Plat Standards. Preliminary/Final Plat. The parcel is a single existing lot of record — no plat is required. Rezoning & Final Stage PUD. The developer will be required to submit final stage PUD plans meeting all conditions of approval from Exhibit Z as approved by the City Council. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the request for rezoning to PUD on June 5d', 2018. The City Council will consider the requested action to rezone the site to PUD at the time in considers the final stage PUD. An ordinance for rezoning will be prepared for that item. A development contract for the PUD will be prepared for review and consideration with the final stage PUD and rezoning, as well. Other Items. Pedestrian access. The site is served by sidewalks proposed for construction as a part of the project along both 3rd Street and Locust Street. The sidewalks require connection to the current sidewalk system along Walnut Street and north Locust Street. Staff would suggest the potential for the applicant working with the City to extend the proposed sidewalks as noted, utilizing a portion of the project's park dedication fee, subject to City Council consideration. The applicant's sketches and photographic illustrations suggest an intention to extend the Walnut Street streetscaping materials and designs to incorporate the subject site. Transition and Shadow Length. The zoning ordinance provides for additional protections when multiple family buildings are proposed near low density housing. The ordinance requires that when a building that is taller than the base zoning allowance casts "additional" shadow on adjacent property, the City may require transitional features to mitigate this issue. The ordinance applies this requirement between 9:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. as timeline for this measurement. In this case, the longest shadowcast between these times on adjacent low density (to the west) will be approximately 2 times the height of the building at 9:00 a.m. during spring and fall. It does not appear that the proposed building shadow would reach the adjoining building as now configured. The applicant has also employed various transition techniques as identified in Section 4.7 of the code, orienting balconies away from the residential uses to the west, and locating off-street parking adjacent to similar uses on adjacent sites. 7 City Council Agenda — 06/25/2018 Planning Commission Review and Recommendation The applicant requested tabling and continuation of the requests for rezoning to PUD and Development Stage PUD at the Planning Commission meeting on May 1St, 2018. In their motion for tabling action on the request and continuing the hearing, the Chairman of the Commission made it clear to those in the audience that the item would come back on June 5th, 2018 and that the agenda would be made available online prior to the meeting. On June 5th, 2018, the Commission held the public hearing on the requests. Other than the applicant, no public were present to address the Commission on the item. In their discussion, the Commissioners sought confirmation that planning staff's recommendation was supportive of the current parking count shown. Staff confirmed the configuration was acceptable, based on available research data as described in the staff report. It was noted that additional on -street parking would also be provided that is not calculated with the 68 spaces shown on the site plans. Further, the underground parking is required to be available for parking and may not be used for storage per the Exhibit Z conditions. The Commission asked if the footprint of the building had been reduced to create the additional landscaping areas. The applicant, Patrick Briggs of the Briggs Companies, was present to address the Commission and indicated that the footprint was the same as what had been introduced for the 44 -unit building, but that it had been shifted southward and westward to allow more green space around the site perimeter. Mr. Briggs stated that per the comments received during the concept stage, some of the amenities were removed in the building, which allowed the unit count increase from 44 to 47. The Commission asked if on -street parking would be restricted during certain times. Staff explained that parking would not be restricted, but may change for snow emergencies. Council member Gabler asked if street parking spaces would be private or public spaces. Staff stated they would be located in the public right-of-way and therefore public. Some concerns related to the City Engineer's comments on stormwater management for the site were also noted. Staff explained that storm water management and emergency overflow management were discussed at length with the applicant. The applicant will have to address the engineer's comments, and the City Council will need to review and approve the final stormwater plan and stormwater maintenance agreement. Mr. Briggs indicated that this project would be maintained long-term by his company. It was noted during the Commission meeting that the EDA and City Council would also review the proposed development for an affordable housing TIF District. City Council Agenda — 06/25/2018 Council member Gabler asked if the Parks and Recreation Commission reviewed the proposal. Staff explained that as the development does not require a plat, the Parks and Recreation Commission did not review the proposal. However, as part of the PUD project enhancements, staff have asked the developer to extend sidewalk along 3rd Street to Walnut Street for park dedication requirements. The Commission inquired as to green space for pets and pet allowances. Mr. Briggs confirmed stating that at all of his properties, the pet areas are limited to a confine space. He also added that ten percent of the tenants would be allowed pets of under twenty pounds. After discussion, the Commission motioned unanimously to recommend approval of the Development Stage PUD and the rezoning to PUD with conditions as specified in Exhibit Z. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS The Planning Commission unanimously recommends Alternative #1 below. Motion to approve the Development Stage PUD for the 47 -unit multi -family proposal by Briggs Companies, based on the findings in Planning Commission resolution PC -2018-020, and subject to the conditions as incorporated in Exhibit Z. 2. Motion to deny the Development Stage PUD for the 47 -unit multi -family proposal by Briggs Companies, based on findings identified by the City Council. 3. Motion to table action on the 47 -unit multi -family proposal by Briggs Companies, subject to additional information from the applicant and/or staff. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff believes that the land use, density, and parking supply are appropriate for the location. As noted in the material above, there are a number of site design details to resolve as a result of the Development Stage PUD review. Final building elevations, materials, and site planning are still in need of additional detail, or alteration given the recommendations in Exhibit Z. In addition to those elements noted as planning and zoning issues, the City Engineer has several civil design comments and recommendations. Staff therefore supports Alternative 1 contingent on the resolution of Exhibit Z conditions as noted. While all plans are not yet in final form, the applicant is proposing to go forward with the submissions as now provided, making required changes as part of Final Stage PUD documentation. In making their recommendation, the Planning Commission was asked to consider whether the project is adequately clear and plans are sufficient to justify a Development Stage PUD recommendation E City Council Agenda — 06/25/2018 In working with the applicant since the concept submittal, staff believes that the design and site elements are evolving toward a project that will meet the intent of the City's Comprehensive Plan objectives. If the Council believes that it has had an adequate opportunity to understand the scope and impacts of the project as a PUD, staff would recommend approval with the Exhibit Z conditions a part of any recommendation. The applicant will be required to revise plans consistent with any Council -approved Exhibit Z in order to proceed to Final Stage PUD and final PUD rezoning action. D. SUPPORTING DATA A. Resolution PC -2018-016 B. Aerial Site Image C. Applicant Narrative D. Certificate of Survey E. Site & Utility Plan F. Grading and Erosion Control Plan G. Development Sketch H. Rear Elevation I. Sample Floor Plan J. Landscaping Plan K. Fence, Wall and Signage Illustration L. Photometric Plan M. Lighting Specifications N. Sample Streetscape Images — Sidewalk and Lighting O. City Engineer's Letter, dated May 31St, 2018 P. Applicant Response to Prior Staff Comments Q. Applicant's Engineer Response to Prior Staff Comments R. Comprehensive Plan and Downtown Small Area Plan, Excerpts Z. Conditions of Approval 10 City Council Agenda — 06/25/2018 EXHIBIT Z Development Stage PUD 213 311 Street West Lots 1-3, Block 36, Original Plat of Monticello 1. Assurance that all underground spaces will be available to be occupied, to ensure that the proposed parking supply is adequate as a part of the development contract and final approval. 2. The building design is supplemented with additional stoneibrick treatments, perhaps at the corners of the structure or over the entrance areas, beyond just the first floor, and including consideration of the east wall. 3. Continuation of the first -floor stone down/brick to grade level to cover any foundation block or poured concrete wall exposure. 4. Submission of building elevations for all facades, including complete detail of all proposed materials for the building, including stone/brick, siding, trim, and roofing materials to verify compliance with the intent of the downtown design objectives. 5. Continuation of the decorative fence along the north and east side of the property/parking lot to discourage cross pedestrian traffic. 6. Submission of revised lighting and proposed signage plans for the building and site that show compliance with all required codes. 7. Consideration of completing the sidewalks as noted in this report, working with the City as a portion of the required park dedication fee for this project. 8. Modifications to the proposed site plan, based on final engineering plans, including grading and drainage details. 9. Submission of a final floor plan illustrating the 47 -unit configuration. 10. Detail of any required retaining walls, including the use of materials that complement the building and site planning. 11. Compliance with the terms of the City Engineer's recommendations related to grading, drainage, and utilities in the report dated May 31 st, 2018. 12. Execution of a Development Agreement including park dedication requirements for the proposed project. 13. Consideration of comments of other staff. 11 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2018-016 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A REZONING TO "RIVERTOWN SUITES PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT" DISTRICT AND DEVELOPMENT STAGE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, the applicant proposes to develop property along Locust Street and 3rd Street, legally described as Lots 1-3, Block 36, Original Plat; and WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted an application to develop said property as a 4 -story, 47 unit multiple family residential project under a PUD; and WHEREAS, the site is guided for as "Downtown" in the City's Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the proposed PUD is consistent with the long-term use and development of the property for high density residential uses; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on June 5t", 2018 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: 1. The PUD provides an appropriate means of furthering the intent of the Comprehensive Plan for the site by putting the existing and proposed improvements and parcel to high density residential use. 2. The proposed improvements on the site are consistent with the needs of the development in this location as a high density residential area. 3. The improvements will have expected impacts on public services, including sewer, water, stormwater treatment, and traffic which have been planned to serve the property for the development as proposed. 4. The site improvements will adequately serve the property so as to avoid negative impacts on surrounding private property. 5.. The PUD flexibility for the project, including building height, setbacks, parking supply and other elements, are consistent with the intent of the City's economic development objectives, as well as with the intent of the PUD zoning regulations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, that the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the Monticello City Council approves the Rezoning and Development Stage PUD, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit Z as follows: 1. Assurance that all underground spaces will be available to be occupied, to ensure that the proposed parking supply is adequate as a part of the development contract and final approval. 2. The building design is supplemented with additional stone/brick treatments, perhaps at the corners of the structure or over the entrance areas, beyond just the first floor, and including consideration of the east wall. 3. Continuation of the first -floor stone downibrick to grade level to cover any foundation block or poured concrete wall exposure. 4. Submission of building elevations for all facades, including complete detail of all proposed materials for the building, including stoneibrick, siding, trim, and roofing materials to verify compliance with the intent of the downtown design objectives. 5. Continuation of the decorative fence along the north and east side of the property/parking lot to discourage cross pedestrian traffic. 6. Submission of revised lighting and proposed signage plans for the building and site that show compliance with all required codes. 7. Consideration of completing the sidewalks as noted in this report, working with the City as a portion of the required park dedication fee for this project. 8. Modifications to the proposed site plan, based on final engineering plans, including grading and drainage details. 9. Submission of a final floor plan illustrating the 47 -unit configuration. 10. Detail of any required retaining walls, including the use of materials that complement the building and site planning. 11. Compliance with the terms of the City Engineer's recommendations related to grading, drainage, and utilities in the report dated May 31 st, 2018. 12. Execution of a Development Agreement including park dedication requirements for the proposed project. 13. Consideration of comments of other staff. ADOPTED this 5th day of June, 2018, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. ATTEST: MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION Brad i unity Development Director The Briggs Companies - Request for Rezoning to Planned Unit Development (PUD) and Dev. Stage PUD Lot 1, 2, and 3, Block 36 1 2123rd Street West I PID: 155-010-036030 Created by: City of Monticello Development Stage Application 4-13-18 Narrative To construct a New 44 unit, 4 story Apartment Building consisting of 25-- 1 Bedroom Suites and 19-- 2 Bedroom Suites. 44 Total Units. —1st floor exterior fagade would include 5" EDCO Steel siding & Cultured Stone on all elevations. 204" floor EDCO 5" Steel siding. High Definition Copper Steel Shingle Shakes on each roof dormer with black screened in porches trimmed out in almond Trim Coil for Accents on all balconies to include almond railings and maintenance free decking. All Trims including Garage doors, windows, soffit, facia, Freeze Boards to include almond color for accents. 33 Underground parking stalls, 37 Uncovered parking stalls on the North Elevation, 4 stalls on Locust Street, and 8 stalls on 3rd street which is a total of 82 stalls/44= 1.9 stalls per unit. Along 3rd and Locust Street there will be stamped stained Burgundy concrete. Tree Plantings to be imbedded in the sidewalk landscaping design will be completed as a team with city staff during PUD Phase. Proposed objectives are to Design, Construct and own a multifamily apartment building in a downtown housing district to revitalize the area with a focus on setting a standard for quality design and a commitment to conserve tenant energy consumption. Conceptual development schedule: 2/21/18-8/1/18 Development Stage 8/1/18 Construction Start 4/1/19 Certificate of Occupancy 6/1/19# Completion of all Impervious services CCD Overlay Review Analysis. Chapter 3 Zoning Districts. Multifamily Dwellings. Under parking requirements, we meet the minimum number of total parking stalls which is 1.5 stalls per unit. Thank you for giving us this opportunity to work with and be a part of The City of Monticello Housing Efforts. Patrick Briggs 612-919-1561-pat@thebriggscompanies.com Monticello 3r1 Street Corner Amenities 1. Washer/Dryer hook-ups in every unit 2. Community Room with kitchen, tables, furniture & Wi-Fi 3. Elevator 4. 9 -foot ceilings with vaulted ceilings on 4th floor 5. Stainless Steel Appliances 6. Designer Lighting 7. Magic Pack furnaces and air conditioning in each suite with Wi-Fi Thermostats 8. Sub metered water in each suite 9. 2 panel doors with Brush Nickle hardware levers with Key Fob access to all doors 10. Controlled Entry 11. Surveillance throughout entire community 12. Onsite Management 13. Package Receiving 14. Outside Patio 15. Outdoor Seating 16. Heated Underground Parking 17. High Speed Internet 18. Balconies 19. Screened in Porches on all balconies wrapped with Almond aluminum railings Listing Contact Information Engineer: Stark Engineering, Wayne Stark 320-249-2611- wavnes a,starken2ineer.com Surveyor: Duffy Engineering, Barry Dorniden 320-258-2906- barrvd(a,duffvenp.com. Applicant: The Briggs Companies, Patrick Briggs 612-919-1561- pat(athebriQgscompanies.com April 13th, 2018 City of Monticello Attn: Angela Schumann 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1 Monticello, MN 55362 RE: Written Statement of Applicants understanding of financial requirements for the development of a PUD Dear Mrs. Schumann 1. Please see attached Original Signatures of Applicant & Owner for Development Stage Application. 2. The Accurate Unit Mix is located in the Revised Narrative. 3. All floor plans, including garage layout is attached 4. Colored Elevations with material information is located in the revised Narrative Document 5. Lighting Style is attached. Mounting and light distribution plan is Design Build. 6. Location and detail of proposed Signage 7. Large Trash and recycling collection area is located in the building. 8. Thank you for your letter dated April 6th 2018 regarding Planning File 2018-008. Our company understands and has budgeted for the development of this PUD for a Multifamily Housing Project. We look forward to doing more PUD Developments with city staff in the near future. We look forward to seeing you on April 24th 2018 at 2:00 PM at the Monticello City Hall, as well as the public hearing with the Planning Commission on Tuesday, May 1St, 2018 at 6:00 PM Sincerely, r �t iggs The Briggs Companies 633 Upland Ave NW, Suite C Elk River, MN 55330 Property Owner's Statement I am the fee title owner of the described property and I agree to this application. I certify that I am in compliance with all ordinance requirements and conditions regarding o er City approval that have been previously granted. Printed Name/Title:'"��, (Signature / (Date)4-2-18 _ - � I Applicants StatAent This application shall be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding the application. I have completed all of the applicable filing requirements and I hereby acknowledge that I have read and fully understand the applicable provisions of the City Ordinances and current policies related to this application and that the documents and information I have submitted are true and correct. Printed Name/Title: - �— 4-2-18 (Signatu % (Date) Appli is Statement Regarding Fees & Escrows I acknowledge the Fees & Escrow Purpose explanation below and hereby agree to pay all statements received pertaining to additional application expense and City review. Printed Name/Title: _ y 4-2-18 {Signatur(Date) Time' or Review MN State 15.99 allows a 60 -day review period for final action on a land use application (does not apply to plat applications), once that application is found to be complete, unless the City extends the review period and so notifies the applicant. Your request will not be scheduled for public hearing or City review until all required information has been provided and found to be adequate by the Community Development Department. Purpose of Fees & Escrow Fees: The application fees are used for publication of the public hearing notice in the Monticello Times, for postage to mail the required notice to adjacent properties as outlined by ordinance, and recording fees. Escrow- The City uses escrow deposits for staff and consultant time for case review and preparation of documents related to the application. This may include engineering, legal, planning and environmental consultation. Should the original escrow be exceeded, the applicant or responsible party will be billed for all additional services. It is the policy of the City of Monticello to require applicants for land use approvals to reimburse the City for costs incurred in reviewing and acting upon applications, so that these costs are not borne by the taxpayers of the City. These costs include all of the City's out-of-pocket costs for expenses, including the City's costs for review of the application by the City's staff, Consulting Engineer, Consulting Planner, City Attorney, or other consultants. The City will invoice the applicant for these costs within 3 months of final action on the land use application and payment will be due within thirty (30) days. If payment is not received as required by this agreement, the City will proceed on action to assess or lien. Payment of costs will be required whether the application is granted or denied. CITY REVIEW INFORMATION" fN'TtmAla"(5 Application Received Date Application Determined Complete Efate/By I / Application Action Deadline Elate I 60 Days 120 Days ", 0 coW La N oc �w N V...w 1ft% • W, W J 0—M Q U cn ° U U •,., Q 3 0 O O U � k N q) Uq) .0. .0, v0. .0. Z C O m (n U m Q N o 1 w J I O C O C C 0 3 N 0 J N O O c E o, I I I w 5 o O C aci o �c Ql � Z U N C •j �. y O k U IIIIA-N III �� V c O � ,,�� U Opp CX ;� vOi o O O - O V -i E u) U j O O O O V N N= °i J c° _ 3 ° �' � o o C c O N L> as c 'S W q) °�>Q to O Oc o O C O r y .O. O q)_ �lll �Jkl U U N a U�cN W y N Q C3 U O� o 0 O O O o t C N J C " r) o u°i 3 O O U� o °: �' p O 0 U 0 a) y a) y a) y a) y a) 0 a) 0 h a) a) O a) O a) 0 a) y y a) a) 0 y a) a) O a) co a) Z o O o O O O o 0 0 0 o O O O O 0 0 Q O aci O aci c) aci 0 aci 0 aci 0 aci 0 aci aci 0 0 aci C) aci 0 aci 0 aci aci 0 0 aci aci 0 0 aci O aci O I •i C �� N � p N O O O CO "`o dl O y Z Z Q•� Z %� �°0 a C U J U Q JC O C c •�.. ° c C C tnO OpU J 0 0 (Mel N q) 0 4 c •r q? 'c '� > > J� Ei ❑Z m ®-9 7t co a . q) ° 000etc �3 •� a N ai G, �u o l� o L N w J J • W, W J 0—M Q U cn ° U U ti Q 3 0 O O U � N N q) Uq) .0. .0, v0. .0. JC UO ap m (n U m Q m m00 o o 1 w J I O C O C C 0 3 N 0 q) OO 0 0 O O OO c o, I I I w 5 o C aci o �c Ql � Z U ) m S o> j y y k 3O \p O\ \ �0C ;.4, \ ,�O \ eS 1J 8 ry�A�\ \ � /bo,F 09 / / \ 06p \ \ \ \ %moss/ \ d/ o�o� os / \ \ d ` / \ a/ Yro yo /oho �896'\ \ \ \c \ \ � 0 �6� �c� a \ \ % 1 coo \ \ Q \ \ ` k \ /`� ��\\ \ \ do � \ O U) 4j \\ / \ \ � �•• \ \ \ � °£'%9 0'99/ / °'� ��`�\^� 6,ZN \ o% yryv Quo £��\ S,� d �✓ p N LO \ Co• �y \ \ o o ° k S� 9�0 \ O� \}.�J� Od � J \ / Z6 �OiO�j AN \ o Q OHO/ (-' �' \ o, \ me 0 /moo o�' � •• • \ \ \ � Q\O 4 SOF 1 N \ \ rn 928.2 N x C5 N / J o CA- 9191 AO;9 .::.... � �, C�,� / \ of �,, c ^�• N � 0) ... Co \ `gip 930J c �}.�k � oAo�\ \41� \ d \ \ o9a �oJ,d", 050 \ \ Z O U U) W 0 Im w0 � Z ti Q 3 0 O •q) � N -Q) .0, r0.. .0. .0, v0. .0. O 0 ap m (n U m Q m m00 o o 1 w J I O 0 0 0 0 0 L- OO 0 0 O O OO O OO I I I w 5 o O aci o �c Ql � Z U V Z m _ �.LO LZ -t, U U IIIIA-N III �� V A A N \p O\ \ �0C ;.4, \ ,�O \ eS 1J 8 ry�A�\ \ � /bo,F 09 / / \ 06p \ \ \ \ %moss/ \ d/ o�o� os / \ \ d ` / \ a/ Yro yo /oho �896'\ \ \ \c \ \ � 0 �6� �c� a \ \ % 1 coo \ \ Q \ \ ` k \ /`� ��\\ \ \ do � \ O U) 4j \\ / \ \ � �•• \ \ \ � °£'%9 0'99/ / °'� ��`�\^� 6,ZN \ o% yryv Quo £��\ S,� d �✓ p N LO \ Co• �y \ \ o o ° k S� 9�0 \ O� \}.�J� Od � J \ / Z6 �OiO�j AN \ o Q OHO/ (-' �' \ o, \ me 0 /moo o�' � •• • \ \ \ � Q\O 4 SOF 1 N \ \ rn 928.2 N x C5 N / J o CA- 9191 AO;9 .::.... � �, C�,� / \ of �,, c ^�• N � 0) ... Co \ `gip 930J c �}.�k � oAo�\ \41� \ d \ \ o9a �oJ,d", 050 \ \ Z O U U) W 0 Im w0 � Z ti Q 3 0 O � N O a 0 0 O U co O 0 ap m (n U m Q m m00 o o 1 w J I O 0 0 0 0 0 L- ~ 0 W Q •�.: O aci o �c Ql � Z U V Z °2 O _ �.LO LZ -t, U U W �� V QO Zed• N C ,,�� U Opp +, ,^ VJ +, +! 0 O O - O V -i a q)m(.0 0 3O Z o II V ° Loc °' °i c° _ 3 ° �' � o o C c w as c 'S W q) °�>Q to Oc 7z�.° C,- O� o aco q)_ �lll �Jkl U U NOS O•�O 3 >� U�cN W y N Q C3 U c O00 o ° j am u� 6 Q) q) 4 rj 3 O o ° q) o U a> Zmoo azo o:z — �Q k Zz VSO � oQON Z o ° c ti� co �pQ ZZ y 4 ui o Z Q 4 0 � °� W �'.c O V p Q. r° Y vi ° 0O, c�a0i j y 0 O ff° U Z O Q C k~ O >, q O N 0 =�O O o co o~au, I •i C �� N � p N O O O CO "`o dl O y Z Z Q•� Z %� �°0 a C U J U Q JC O C c •�.. ° c C C tnO OpU C7 V 3 N N q) 0 4 c •r q? 'c '� > > ° co > q) ° 000etc �3 •� a N ai G, �u o \p O\ \ �0C ;.4, \ ,�O \ eS 1J 8 ry�A�\ \ � /bo,F 09 / / \ 06p \ \ \ \ %moss/ \ d/ o�o� os / \ \ d ` / \ a/ Yro yo /oho �896'\ \ \ \c \ \ � 0 �6� �c� a \ \ % 1 coo \ \ Q \ \ ` k \ /`� ��\\ \ \ do � \ O U) 4j \\ / \ \ � �•• \ \ \ � °£'%9 0'99/ / °'� ��`�\^� 6,ZN \ o% yryv Quo £��\ S,� d �✓ p N LO \ Co• �y \ \ o o ° k S� 9�0 \ O� \}.�J� Od � J \ / Z6 �OiO�j AN \ o Q OHO/ (-' �' \ o, \ me 0 /moo o�' � •• • \ \ \ � Q\O 4 SOF 1 N \ \ rn 928.2 N x C5 N / J o CA- 9191 AO;9 .::.... � �, C�,� / \ of �,, c ^�• N � 0) ... Co \ `gip 930J c �}.�k � oAo�\ \41� \ d \ \ o9a �oJ,d", 050 \ \ Z O U U) W 0 Im w0 � Z L >, OEoo va�E41 Q-0 U L 3 T Ci +� c or o CO cnE�oc C, L' 41 -041 7 o 0 0 .� 0 (D T N J 1 U0 UN _ J >, 3 'D o L -0 C 0- —LQ-)E-oa Z♦♦'V OZ n a W as n H0 ♦A a� 0a 0 m O O r7 6 z Z Qf O D 00 o �m � C N o (n D N N M m;1- 1 00 00 01 M N Ln Ln N zl � co -r- Of W Y W m c� CD Z wN Z w 00 >-w � 1 >Z NcNLLJ o �� UN ch Cf) WZ � r >Q pJ JUS MFL-LJ 0 U Q 3 0 O co N > 0 0 O U co O 0 ap m (n U m Q m m00 o o 1 w J I O 0 0 0 0 0 L- L >, OEoo va�E41 Q-0 U L 3 T Ci +� c or o CO cnE�oc C, L' 41 -041 7 o 0 0 .� 0 (D T N J 1 U0 UN _ J >, 3 'D o L -0 C 0- —LQ-)E-oa Z♦♦'V OZ n a W as n H0 ♦A a� 0a 0 m O O r7 6 z Z Qf O D 00 o �m � C N o (n D N N M m;1- 1 00 00 01 M N Ln Ln N zl � co -r- Of W Y W m c� CD Z wN Z w 00 >-w � 1 >Z NcNLLJ o �� UN ch Cf) WZ � r >Q pJ JUS MFL-LJ 0 U co 00 > W V) v U 0 ~ W L O O U U 0 +, ,^ VJ +, +! 0 0 - O U -i a Existing Building 401 \ d °° �7 \ \ / d V� )J Jj CONNEC T TO EX. 8 P VC / ll/ g Existing Buildin W/ CLEANOUT cb� / A-/ / \\ cC / �M/001 / �V \ C6 ,� (N/ SAN. SER VICE 923>> 8" PVC 86LF @ 7%'/ . // �c�, / 75" RCP Existing CONNECT TO a �_ � �` c 97LF @ 0.4% / EX. 8 DIP W/ / / r/ 8"x6" REDUCER �� \ / / STORM CB#7 RlM-927.70 " INV= 921.84 °0, C5WA TER SER VICE / ,� \ g 2� . 5 / 6 DIP, 23LF PED. RAMP 75" RCP / 4OLF @ 0:4% 4c � LL / \\ 923 s1> / STORM MH A LL / — , RlM— 937.00 a. Q ° �c LL IN V= 921.4 7 ; °. / 15" RCP CONNECT TO , 86LF @ 0.4% EX. 75" RCP © �' ° �. 19, B672 CURB 2 & GU TIER CONCRETE p ROOF DRAIN / ° //i 7.3 / 9 VALLEY GUTTER G�< CONNECTION a / STORM CB#2 DRI VE DOOR /� r ° / �, RIM= 924.70 (EOE) � A. FOR TRASH ROOM ° INV=922.78 COORDINA TE W/ /5' CONCRETE 7_> � 16 MECH. PLANS Goj/ da /r SIDEWALK � ° CONCRETE A 76_ RETAINING WALL F° / Z71 6' CONCRETE / PROPOSED 4—STORY / ° DURA—SLOPE TRENCH DRAIN //16LF \ // SIDEWALK /r APARTMENT BUILDING CONNECTED TO ROOF DRAIN/SYSTEM / AREA=11, 808 SF /,,� \ \ \ \ FFE= 931.75 a ° / GFE=921.75 ,/ GARAGE DRIVE—IN ° PA Tl0 DECK / DOOR \ ° I \ (TYP) / // 14 . ° c, F° \ e / B672 CURB 0) 9 / b& GU T TER // \ ° / '9o 79A\ G 21 Ex CB /. A /// —Rim= 928.92 oe C \ ti \ \ \ CONCRETE — VALLEY GUTTER In v= /a \ \ oti�, / \ Win. cj '�► , HF \\ \ \ , \Al\ / / ° 21A A 8/j \� s S4, N OTES: 1. BASE PLAN IS A SURVEY PREPARED BY BOGART, PEDERSON & ASSOCIATES. 2. ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFIRM ALL LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT UTILITY COMPANIES VIA GOPHER STATE ONE—CALL ONLINE OR BY CALLING 811 OR 1-800-252-1166. THE CITY IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY ADDITIONAL COSTS INCURRED RELATED TO VARIATIONS IN THE UTILITY AS—BUILT ELEVATIONS. 3. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO THE MOST RESTRICTIVE OF THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS, THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO AND THE LATEST EDITION OF MNDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION. 4. EXISTING ZONING: CENTRAL COMMUNITY DISTRICT (CCD) PROPOSED AS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) 5. REQUIRED PARKING STALLS = 82 (2.5 STALLS PER 2 BEDROOM UNIT & 1.5 STALLS PER 1 BEDROOM UNIT). PROPOSED PARKING STALLS = 80 (33 GARAGE STALLS & 47 SURFACE STALLS). 6. LOT AREA = 33,124 SF PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREA = 26,617 SF (80%). 7. WATER SERVICE SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH A MINIMUM 7.5' OF COVER. N SITE AND UTILITY 0 20' 40' PLAN REVIEW PLAN NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION U o O O L� z re) ice" Z o LoN N a� �' �C"2 V J o1 � 01 vi w (p U �C\2� W N zoco m m �C\2� Ld Y Q U L� W z z w o O � U +-' CL >' Q Z Z Y w Z oU�z U �w W W Lv�ia�a QU cf) (n Q W Ld W Q w Q:� = O J Q�Q Q WLLJ U J C) L� Qr z LLj LJ > I O coj a w \ � Q N OTES: 1. BASE PLAN IS A SURVEY PREPARED BY BOGART, PEDERSON & ASSOCIATES. 2. ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFIRM ALL LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT UTILITY COMPANIES VIA GOPHER STATE ONE—CALL ONLINE OR BY CALLING 811 OR 1-800-252-1166. THE CITY IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY ADDITIONAL COSTS INCURRED RELATED TO VARIATIONS IN THE UTILITY AS—BUILT ELEVATIONS. 3. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO THE MOST RESTRICTIVE OF THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS, THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO AND THE LATEST EDITION OF MNDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION. 4. EXISTING ZONING: CENTRAL COMMUNITY DISTRICT (CCD) PROPOSED AS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) 5. REQUIRED PARKING STALLS = 82 (2.5 STALLS PER 2 BEDROOM UNIT & 1.5 STALLS PER 1 BEDROOM UNIT). PROPOSED PARKING STALLS = 80 (33 GARAGE STALLS & 47 SURFACE STALLS). 6. LOT AREA = 33,124 SF PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREA = 26,617 SF (80%). 7. WATER SERVICE SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH A MINIMUM 7.5' OF COVER. N SITE AND UTILITY 0 20' 40' PLAN REVIEW PLAN NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION �0,>,— o 0 0 �� U o a3 oW L� z re) ice" Z o LoN N a� M V J o1 4 7 C Z N w (p U o �Wo W N m m 0 Ld Y Q U L� W 2, w J O � U +-' CL >' Q Z Z Y E Z oU�z U �w W W Lv�ia�a QU cf) (n Q W C� W Q w Q:� = O J Q�Q Q c� U J C) L� �0,>,— o 0 0 �� U o a3 oW L� z re) ice" Z o LoN N a� U V J o1 4 7 C Z N w (p U o �Wo W N W X n L Y Q U L� W 2, C J 3 Oa� o �LJL,J � U +-' CL >' Q m OD 0 c WN wco oU�z U �w W W Lv�ia�a QU cf) 3 �o z U N N Lo L� 0� Oz LoN N °00 U V J o1 o w r') N n/ Lo L� LoN N W U V J zI o w LJ �° W z�< W X n Q Y Q U L� W L� m �LJL,J CD �N _U O zZ E WN wco oU�z U �w W W �� (n N QU cf) U Q �Zo �Wz o O 0 �_j °r O Q�Q OJ I( Yi li t-l/Jl J C) H LiJ V J � z LJ z�< Q Q I— �LJL,J WLd D�z oU�z LLJ cf) V C) o z 0 O LLJ m U z LLj LJ > I O Existing Building 41� 401 0) Al L" 77 4�1 0) j INLET Existin PROTECTION g Building (b A 9� 928,31 _zz�_ . . A A\ P27.81 04& 4 c� Q) 929 77 A \ I 00 928.50 00 \4�1 cv Existh A) SILT SOCK 1-9 950.10 929.60 ROCK 1929.05 CONSTRUCT'ON '928 55' 4 9,30.75 EN TRA N CE c� :4 950.2511 27.70 11 71 9 A 926.60 A N 4 957.5 gio. 1� 7' 929.65 -,-,_19JO. 75 .0 z_L_ 9,30.80 9,30.30 00 9,30.60 9,30.10 9,30.09 ROCK LOG SUITABLE FOR 929.59 CONSTRUCRON TRAFFIC J.15�> 30 Qj) 11 lk Po PROPOSED 4 -STORY APARTMENT BUILDING 928.00 SILT SO Cw\ AREA=11,808 SF 927.75 FFE= 9 J 1. 75 92 GFE=921.75 EOF=924.7 LOWEST OPENING -925.70 SILT SOCK 19 19 -i -I. 0 R CK LOG SUITABLE FOR 0 CONSTRUCTION TR A FF1 C �� 4�V 9,37.15 Q, 9,30.65 .,7 -qjl. 00 zz 17 4 930.50 k 21 4.) -Y,7 '9 J. 19 66 j, 950. 0 v 9,30.10 Ex CB 4 -Rim= 928.92 ON - In v= 925.20 P& 40, 0 .d 'd INLET 929.80 PROTECTION INLET PROTECTION Sh" Al� 6, ls� >> k -1-, 9 e(5 > '9 77 Q) 'o 0-) C\2 z CD co C\2 P4 CrD NOTES: 1 . BASE PLAN IS A SURVEY PREPARED BY BOGART, PEDERSON & ASSOCIATES. 2. ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFIRM ALL LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT UTILITY COMPANIES VIA GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL ONLINE OR BY CALLING 811 OR 1-800-252-1166. 3. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO THE MOST RESTRICTIVE OF THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS, THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO AND THE LATEST EDITION OF MNDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION. 4. THE FOLLOWING SEQUENCE AND PROTOCOLS SHALL BE FOLLOWED FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DURING THE SITE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS: A. INSTALL PERIMETER CONTROLS (SILT FENCE) AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS PRIOR TO START OF WORK. B. NO SOIL STOCKPILES OR CONCRETE WASHOUTS ARE ALLOWED ON THE PROJECT SITE. C. MAINTAIN ALL TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL DEVICES IN PLACE UNTIL THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA HAS BEEN STABILIZED. INSPECT TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL DEVICES ON A WEEKLY BASIS AND AFTER EACH 1/2" OR MORE RAIN EVENT. CLEAN OR MAINTAIN THESE DEVICES AS NEEDED TO BE EFFECTIVE. REPLACE DETERIORATED, DAMAGED OR ROTTED EROSION CONTROL DEVICES IMMEDIATELY. D. REMOVE ALL SOILS AND SEDIMENTS DEPOSITED ONTO PUBLIC AND/OR PRIVATE PAVEMENT AREAS WITHIN 24 HOURS. REMOVAL OF TRACKING AND DEPOSITION MATERIALS SHALL BE COMPLETED AT THE END OF EACH WORK DAY OR WHEN IT OCCURS. SWEEPING MAY BE ORDERED AT ANY TIME IF CONDITIONS WARRANT. E. PERFORM SITE REMOVALS, GRADING, EXCAVATION AND EMBANKMENT SEED AND MULCH ALL DISTURBED AREAS OUTSIDE OF PROPOSED PAVEMENT AND BUILDING AREAS WITHIN 72 HOURS OF THIS WORK. F. INSTALL BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SECTION. FINE GRADE SITE AND RESTORE GREEN AREAS WITH PERMANENT VEGETATION PER LANDSCAPE PLANS. G. REMOVE ALL TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES AFTER SITE HAS UNDERGONE FINAL STABILIZATION AND PERMANENT VEGETATION HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED WITH AT LEAST 70% COVERAGE. GRADING & ECS PLAN 1 PP=20$ 0 20' 40' REVIEW PLAN NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION z 0 U U) Ld LLJ Qr LLI < L 0 z U c; 5-: re) 0 2: 0) v V) M 0 c CL D r- X w LLI (D v CD r__ C14 -y r2- Qr-) m m Q Ld ��L < U Ld E .2 Ld _j o (D 4- ��N y LL_ LLJ N LaL�j 0000 CD >__ L-1 LLJ LLJ 0 < U� L;j cf) < LLJ z 0 Lj 0 LLJ Q:� r < < 0 _j �2Ld I— z U c; Lo (D re) 0 2: 0) v V) :E 5 �-o5 0 c CL D r- X w LLI (D v CD r__ C14 -y r2- Qr-) LLJ < ��L < U Ld E .2 0 >' U (D 4- ��N 0-0 Z) - a) , =3 = *9 0 - (D z z E LLJ N LaL�j 0000 CD >__ L-1 LLJ LLJ [__ I cn < U� a cf) z U Lo (D 0 2: G) 1 00 U� C)o 00 01 LLI r') N C/) LLJ V) (J-) LLJ LLJ cf) < _j < I-__ 0 Z: Ld v) LLJ LLJ LLJ 0 0 LLJ cf) 0 C) 0 _j _j 0 LLJ M c) F- LLj LLJ z > :I- o SHE�_T \0. C2 Lo (D Lo N U� r, I ) LLI CD r__ LLJ < ��L < U Ld m U CD ��N 0 (D z z E LLJ N LaL�j 0000 >__ L-1 LLJ LLJ [__ I cn < U� > 11� cf) < z 0 Lj 0 _j r < < 0 _j �2Ld I— C/) LLJ V) (J-) LLJ LLJ cf) < _j < I-__ 0 Z: Ld v) LLJ LLJ LLJ 0 0 LLJ cf) 0 C) 0 _j _j 0 LLJ M c) F- LLj LLJ z > :I- o SHE�_T \0. C2 e'l Sevp-1 I f BEDROOM LIVING C� ISL oo n �oo KITCHEN � BATH O L Lfl_ jl - O -7. BEDROOM BEDROOM; M.BEDROOM TCHEN 1__ BATH O L o M. BATH F7i J �Fo 10 Ot 2 BEDROOM. GAM1/� of BASEMENT 1 1 2 2 2 µ' �r 7 L,V21, 1 1 1 1 1 IST FLOOR -PON 2 2 2 1WH weµ«r 2 1. y 1 1 2 __ 2ND, 3RD, 4TH FLOOR Revision #: #2 Date: 5/24/2018 / :r rYa\9+2146 CONCRETE VALLEY CUTTER \ \�I \ F \ nh 929 H \ 911 .29 9363y \ '03 Scale: Landscape Plan: L-1 o' 1" = 60'0" RIVERTOWN SUITES LEGEND Y �L•E-rAN CU T AWN & LANDSCAPING ��IT1= AIVD LAI\I[;APf PLAN rm N wq Landscape Design by: ET CLEAN CUT LAWN & LANDSCAPE ,', � „� 1 ��:. -,�� _ .�, ~ "'� � r: �.- � - .¢� r : � � . � ,. - � r "' � �� _ �, "yy � `� Z� / � �M �� ' t Calculation Summary Label CalcType Units Avg Max Min Avg/Min Max/Min Description PtSpcLr PtSpcTb Meter Type CalcPts_1 Illuminance Fc 0.80 7.0 0.0 N.A. N.A. Readings taken at 0'-0" AFG 10 10 Horizontal Luminaire Schedule Symbol Qty Tag Label Arrangement Lum. Lumens Arr. Lum. Lumens LLF Description Lum. Watts Arr. Watts Total Watts Filename 14 S SLIM57 SINGLE 5579 5579 1.000 SLIM57 48.7 48.7 681.8 SLIM57 -Cool - RAB02604.IES Expanded Luminaire Location Summary LumNo Tag X Y MTG HT Orient Tilt 1 S 136.483 237.686 24 67.116 0 2 S 111.076 230.232 18 154.486 0 3 S 168.397 228.48 34 67.116 0 4 S 203.995 208.533 34 67.116 0 5 S 98.187 203.227 18 154.486 0 6 S 254.322 187.972 34 67.116 0 7 S 103.209 178.961 24 242.851 0 8 S 271.2 172.935 24 67.116 0 9 S 128.679 160.242 34 242.851 0 10 S 272.641 151.773 18 337 0 11 S 173.176 135.692 34 242.851 0 12 S 259.752 124.768 18 337 0 13 S 219.207 116.359 34 242.851 0 14 S 242.53 111.756 24 242.851 0 Total Quantity: 14 NOTES: * The light loss factor (LLF) is a product of many variables, only lamp lumen depreciation (LLD) has been applied to the calculated results unless otherwise noted. The LLD is the result (quotient) of mean lumens / initial lumens per lamp manufacturers' specifications. * Illumination values shown (in footcandles) are the predicted results for planes of calculation either to the plane of calculation. * The calculated results of this lighting simulation represent an anticipated prediction of system performance. Actual measured results may vary from the anticipated performance and are subject to means and methods which are beyond the control of the designer. * Mounting height determination is job site specific, our lighting simulations assume a mounting height (insertion point of the luminaire symbol) to be taken at the top of the symbol for ceiling mounted luminaires and at the bottom of the symbol for all other luminaire mounting configurations. * RAB Lighting Inc. luminaire and product designs are protected under U.S. and International intellectual property laws. horizontal, vertical or inclined as designated in the calculation summary. Meter orientation is normal Patents issued or pending apply. , 'y •` �' � tiff. � ti FIM'. .3 p vu ._ . •,:�_ `'r. 1 it 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 •0.1_ 0.1 r 0.1 o. @A4 0.1 t0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 f • Y a. _ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1.r, 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1- 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0� 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 YI.�•�li� 1y �r, f- • 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 r0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 ii 0.2 0.2 0.2 0. ?,.. 0.2 2 0.1' r:0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.,1 2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0/ 0 0 •0.2 0.2 0.-'1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 i } r 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0. 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 f'%0,,2 �F�.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 rr • ~ r' r 'L L 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.7 0.8 0.9 .0 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.:5 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.2. 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 ■■ r •'1 Y k ,1 �•, • r � 1, } 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0. 0.7 0.9 '1 . 1• 1.4 1.6 r' 1.5 1.3 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 - r �. 0.0 0.1 0.1 0 . 11D 0.2 0.3 0.5 r 1.4 2.0 r 2 1 9 /7 1.4 1.1 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.5 0. 0. 0. 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 I.1.7• . '•` r ._ . • � '•i • r •• •�ti 0.0 0.1 •'0.1 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.9/, 7_ $ 2. .•2 2.6 .7 2.6 2.2 1.8 r 1.5 1.3 1.1 0.9 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 r•. r' _ _ �- r % 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.6 1.3 2.6'�i 5 1 7. 2.1 2.7 2. '• .2•_ �• 1 9 18 1.5 1.2 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.4 0 0.2 0. 0.1 0.1 �� r � 0.0 •0•.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.9 1.-• 5•.2 4.8� 3 1.8 2.7�+� 2 1.8 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.5y 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 rr••�� _ L ti 1 0.1 VAL&(Y1L._ 0.2 0.5 1.2 2.5 .4 5 5.4 1.0 2.1 2. •• • 2. 1 1 1 1 1.3 0.9 0.6 0.4 0.3 J � � r F-1 •� r 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.5 1.2 28 6.0 .8 - 1.5 1.5 h .�.,3 2.5f�L21 �� 1.9 1.4 0.9 0.6 0.3 0.2 0.1 ti � - ti 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0 6 1.2 • 2' 1 3. 9 0.5 1.3 1.8 _ ,5 20_ 1 1.2 0.7 0�' � TjzA.WeJ)c.: 0 ` L 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0 6 l�j 1.9 2.k,4. 3 3.8 2.5 5 0.8 p�A� '� I ,.(I r� I F 0.1 0.1 0. 2 0. 3 O. i Or 8 2.8 4.1 7 2 .' _ --73.0 i.;-6 0. 8 0. ,5 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.9 1.5•'• ,6 .7 3.5 2.1 .9ti' 1.7 0.9 0.4 0.2 0-5ff1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.4 6.7 1.2 1.9 3.5~ 0 2.`�f 1.1 0.0 .1 6.2 �..1 1.4 0.8 0.4 0.2 0.1 ' .. r -, 4. 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.9 1.3 1.7 2.0 2.3 4.4 .6 1 3.7 1.6 0.6 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.9 1.1 1.5 1.7 1 1. 9 2. 5.2 4.3 2.6 1.3 0.6 0.3 0.2 0.1 ( .. r.. til 1 �' 1 5 ' - 1 0. 1 0. 1 0. 1 0. 1 0. 2 0. 3 0. 4 0. 6 0. 8 1. 0 1. 2 1. 3. 1. 4 1 1. 6 �'q 1, 2. 5 i 'L rr 5_ 0. 7 . 0 5 5 3. 6 1. 9 0. 9 0. 5 0.2 0. 1 0. 1 1 7 :J. 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.7 0.8 1.0 1.1 1.•4 1.7 1.8 11.8 ,L ,R.�ti 1. 4.2 4.5 2.7 1.4 0.7 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 1 ' � 1 1 1 ti. •' 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 1.0 1.3 1.4 1.5 1!�6 2%0 2�8 3.6� 3.9 5.1 3.3 .1 2.0 1.4 0.8 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.3 71 2.2 2N •2.8 2.2 1.3 0.8 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 •• Cly. ' , • f , I A f I -L `Ir G''�' TTr�.' � s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.6 '6,7 0.8 1.0 1,2 .l•�� 2.0 2.0 1.7 1.3 0.8 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.� l.br 0.8 '0'5 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 . �1y 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.6 ti, 0..1. 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.2 -'.}. 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 N W r HoW 0 O .o s �a,zsro G O N S W O ro H W � tr� G soi E ro s a v rn w a c tr� o ro m o a a off G G E s+H+� �H o m o G J H N 'tl A U O 7 O � 0 C 1S I N N N TS N H N O N G p, N U N 0 o v�° ro ro G ro AF� a ro A u] W -0 Z5 1 N E N U H O E rl rl W C s, v o c w rs c or a m c o 7 Z ro ro 'O ro b� a� 'O ro E o rz E>,m�o.H 100 U G . A G O W iU ro 1 1 rov w sa a,� .�roa caH a U .G N ro G ro H N o w G E w F1 a0 1 w H ro 00 o 0 O N U M LC) U o �I I% 0. P 0 "WrI PLED52 52 Watt LED Wallpadt with 3 cutoff options. Equivalent to 25OW MH. Wallpack has mounting bracket with Tether for hands-free wiring. 5 year warranty. LED Info Driver Info l7r�S-li Technical Specifications Constant Current UL Listing: Suitable for wet locations. Lumen Maintenance: 100,000 -hour LED lifespan based on IES LM -80 results and TM -21 calculations. LEDs: Four (4) multi -chip, 13W high -output, long -life LEDs. Drivers: Two drivers, constant current, 720mA, Class 2, $00 - 277V, 50 - 60 Hz, 100 - 277VAC .8 Amps. THD: 13.1% at 120V Fixture Efficacy: 64 Lumens per Watt Ambient Temperature: Suitable for use in 400C ambient temperatures. Surge Protection: 6 KV Cold Weather Starting: The minimum starting temperature is-40"FI-400C. Thermal Management: Cast aluminum Thermal Management system for optimal heat sinking. The WPLED is designed for Cool operation, most efficient output and maximum LED life by minimizing LED junction temperature. Housing: Precision die cast aluminum housing, lens frame. RAMB L I G H T I N G Tech Help Lire: 888 RAa-1000 Copyright 02013 RA13 Ughbq, Inc. M Rights Resawad Color. Bronze is Weight 17.6 lbs -- Y Mounting: Die-cast aluminum wall bracket with (5) 1/2" conduit openings with plugs. Two-piece bracket with tether for ease of installation and wiring. Ann: Die-cast aluminum with wiring access plate. Color Consistency: 7 -step MacAdam Ellipse binning to achieve consistent fixture -to -fixture color. Color Stability: LED color temperature is warrantied to shift no more than 200K in CCT over a 5 year period. Color Accuracy: 67 CRI Color Temperature (Nominal CCT): 5000K Color Uniformity: RAB's range of CCT (Correlated color temperature) follows the guidelines of the American National Standard for Specifications for the Chromaticity of Solid State Lighting (SSL) Products, ANSI C78.377-2008. Reflector. Hydrofonned aluminum designed for maximum efficiency. Gaskets: High temperature silicone. Finish: Our environmentally friendly polyester powder coatings are formulated for high -durability and long-lasting color, and contains no VOC or toxic heavy metals. Email: sales@moweb.com On the web at: www.rabmb.com Nde: specifications are subject 0 change withad nodce Page 1 d 2 Type: Color Temp: 5000K (Cool) 120V: 0.51A Color Accuracy: 67 208V: - 0.33A L70 Lifespan: 100000 240V: 0.29A LM79 Lumens: 3,884 277V: 0.25A Efficacy: 65 LPW Input Watts: 60W Efficiency: 87% l7r�S-li Technical Specifications Constant Current UL Listing: Suitable for wet locations. Lumen Maintenance: 100,000 -hour LED lifespan based on IES LM -80 results and TM -21 calculations. LEDs: Four (4) multi -chip, 13W high -output, long -life LEDs. Drivers: Two drivers, constant current, 720mA, Class 2, $00 - 277V, 50 - 60 Hz, 100 - 277VAC .8 Amps. THD: 13.1% at 120V Fixture Efficacy: 64 Lumens per Watt Ambient Temperature: Suitable for use in 400C ambient temperatures. Surge Protection: 6 KV Cold Weather Starting: The minimum starting temperature is-40"FI-400C. Thermal Management: Cast aluminum Thermal Management system for optimal heat sinking. The WPLED is designed for Cool operation, most efficient output and maximum LED life by minimizing LED junction temperature. Housing: Precision die cast aluminum housing, lens frame. RAMB L I G H T I N G Tech Help Lire: 888 RAa-1000 Copyright 02013 RA13 Ughbq, Inc. M Rights Resawad Color. Bronze is Weight 17.6 lbs -- Y Mounting: Die-cast aluminum wall bracket with (5) 1/2" conduit openings with plugs. Two-piece bracket with tether for ease of installation and wiring. Ann: Die-cast aluminum with wiring access plate. Color Consistency: 7 -step MacAdam Ellipse binning to achieve consistent fixture -to -fixture color. Color Stability: LED color temperature is warrantied to shift no more than 200K in CCT over a 5 year period. Color Accuracy: 67 CRI Color Temperature (Nominal CCT): 5000K Color Uniformity: RAB's range of CCT (Correlated color temperature) follows the guidelines of the American National Standard for Specifications for the Chromaticity of Solid State Lighting (SSL) Products, ANSI C78.377-2008. Reflector. Hydrofonned aluminum designed for maximum efficiency. Gaskets: High temperature silicone. Finish: Our environmentally friendly polyester powder coatings are formulated for high -durability and long-lasting color, and contains no VOC or toxic heavy metals. Email: sales@moweb.com On the web at: www.rabmb.com Nde: specifications are subject 0 change withad nodce Page 1 d 2 if __ _4" vw_-- d series D -Series Size 2 LED Wall Luminaire t gliiirig NIGKMME facts FRIENDLY Specifications Luminaire Back Box (BBW) Width: 18-1/2" Weight: 21 lbs Width: 5-1/2" BBW 11bs (47.0 cm) (9 5 kg) (14.0 cm) Weight: (0.5 kg) Depth: 101, Depth: 1-1/2" (25.4 cm) (3.8 cm) Height- 7-5/8" Height: 4" (19.4 cm) (10.2 cm) For 3/4" NPT D_ W side -entry o ° ° o conduit \al 0 H w DSXW2 LED Catalog Number Notes r` pe Hit the Tab key or mouse over the page to see all interactive elements_ Introduction The D -Series Wall luminaire is a stylish, fully integrated LED solution for building -mount applications. It features a sleek, modern design and is carefully engineered to provide long-lasting, energy-efficient lighting with a variety of optical and control options for customized performance. With an expected service life of over 20 years of nighttime use and up to 76% in energy savings over comparable 40OW metal halide luminaires, the D -Series Wall is a reliable, low -maintenance lighting solution that produces sites that are exceptionally illuminated. EXAMPLE: DSXW2 LED 30C 700 40K T3M MVOLT DDBTXD DSXW2 LED 20C 20 LEDs 350 350 mA 30K 3000 K US Type II MVOLT' Shipped included Shipped installed Shipped installed DDBXD Dark (two 530 530 mA 40K 4000 K Short 120 (blank) Surface PE Photoelectric SF Single bronze engines) 700 700 mA 50K 5000 K T2M Type II 2081 mounting cell, button (120, 277, DBLXD Black 30C 30 LEDstype^ (three 1000 1000mA AMBPC Amber Medium 240 bracket 347V)' DNAXD Natural (1 A) phosphor T3S Type III , engines) p yp 277 PER NEMA twist -lock re- DF Doub(208, 240, (208, 240, aluminum converted Short 347 2 Shipped ceptacle only 480V) 7 DWHXD White T3M Type 111 separately (no controls) HS HousesideDSSXD Sandstone 4802 Medium BBW Surface- DMG 0-10V dim- shields DDBTXD Textured T4M Type IV mounted ming driver (no controls) SPD Separate surge dark Medium back protections bronze box (for DCR Dimmable DBLBXD Textured TFTM Forward conduit and control - black Throw entry) lablevia Shipped Medium ROAM® (no separately; DNATXD Textured ASYDF Asym controls) 5 BSW Bird -deterrent natural aluminum PIRH 180' motion/ spikes metric ambient light WG Wire guard DWHGXD Textured diffuse sensor,15-30' white mtg ht s VG Vandal guard DSSTXD Textured sandstone NOTES Accessories I 1 MVOLT driver operates on any line voltage from 120-277V (50/60 Hz). Specify 120, 208, 240 or 277 options only when Ordered and shipped separately. J ordering with fusing (SF, DF options), or photocontrol (PE option). 2 Available with 30 LED/700mA options only (DSXW2 LED 30C 700). DMG option not available. DLL127F 1.5 JU Photocell - SSLtwist-lock (120-277V) 3 Also available as a separate accessory; see Accessories information. DLL347F 1.5 CUL JU Photocell -55Ltwist-lock (347V)9 4 Photocontrol (PE) requires 120, 208, 240 or 277 voltage option. Not available with motion/ambient light sensors (PIR DLL48OF 1.5CULJU Photocell -SSLtwist-lock(480V)' or PIRH). 5 Specifies a ROAM® enabled luminaire with 0-10V dimming capability; PER option required. Not available with 347V, SCU Shorting cap' 480V or PIRH. Additional hardware and services required for ROAM® deployment; must be purchased separately. Call DSXWHS U House -side shield (one per light engine) 1-800-442-6745 or email: sales@roamservices.net. DSXWBSW U Bird -deterrent spikes 6 Specifies the Sensor Switch SBGR-6-ODP control; see Motion Sensor Guide for details. Includes ambient light sensor. Not available with "PE" option (button type photocell) or DCR. Dimming driver standard. DSXW2WG U Wire guard accessory 7 Single fuse (SF) requires 120, 277 or 347 voltage option. Double fuse (DF) requires 208, 240 or 480 voltage option. DSXW2VG U Vandal guard accessory 8 See the electrical section on page 2 for more details. DSXW2BBW Back box accessory 9 Requires luminaire to be specified with PER option. Ordered and shipped as a separate line item. DDBXD U (specify finish) L/THON/A One Lithonia Way • Conyers, Georgia 30012 • Phone: 800.279.8041 Fax: 770.918.1209 www.lithonia.com OFA L/GHT/NG 0 2012-2014 Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc. All rights reserved. Lumen Output Lumen values are from photometric tests performed in accordance with IESNA LM -79-08. Data is considered to be representative of the configurations shown, within the tolerances allowed by Lighting Facts. Actual performance may differ as a result of end-user environment and application. Actual wattage may differ by +/- 8% when operating between 120-480V +/- 10%. Contact factory for performance data on any configurations not shown here. Drive System1 40K 50K 1 'lll I 111 1 ' Watts Note: Available with phosphor -converted amber LED's (nomenclature AMBPC). These LED's produce light with 97+%>530 nm. Output can be calculated by applying a 0.7 factor to 4000K lumen values and photometric files. US 3,876 1 0 1 108 3,429 1 0 1 95 � T2M 3,694 1 0 1 103 3,267 1 0 1 91 I BS 3,833 1 0 1 106 3,390 1 0 1 94 530 36W I T3M 3,794 1 0 1 105 3,356 1 0 1 93 I T4M 3,717 1 0 2 103 3,288 1 0 1 91 I TFTM 3,864 1 0 1 107 3,418 1 0 1 95 ASYDF 3,454 1 0 2 96 31056 1 0 2 85 US 4,776 1 0 1 102 4,794 1 0 1 102 I T2M 4,552 1 0 1 97 4,569 1 0 1 97 20C I T3S 4,723 1 0 2 100 4,741 1 0 2 101 700 47W I T3M 4,675 1 0 2 99 4,693 1 0 2 100 (20 LEDs) I T4M 4,581 1 0 2 97 4,598 1 0 2 98 TFTM 4,761 1 0 2 101 4,779 1 0 2 102 ASYDF 41257 1 0 2 91 41273 1 0 2 91 US 6,327 1 0 1 84 6,351 1 0 1 85 I T2M 6,029 1 0 2 80 6,052 1 0 2 81 I BS 6,256 1 0 2 83 6,280 1 0 2 84 1000 74W I T3M 6,193 1 0 2 83 6,216 1 0 2 83 I TV 6,067 1 0 2 81 6,090 1 0 2 81 I TFTM 6,307 1 0 2 84 6,330 1 0 2 84 ASYDF 5,638 2 0 2 75 5,660 2 0 2 75 US 5,280 1 0 1 98 5,769 1 0 1 107 I T2M 5,137 1 0 2 95 5,613 1 0 2 104 530 54W I T3S 5,214 1 0 1 97 5,696 1 0 1 105 I UM 5,298 1 0 2 98 5,789 1 0 2 107 I T4M 5,228 1 0 2 97 5,712 1 0 2 106 TFTM 5,223 1 0 2 97 5,707 1 0 2 106 US 6,513 1 0 1 92 7,118 2 0 2 100 30C I T2M 6,337 2 0 2 89 6,925 2 0 2 98 700 71 yY I T3S 6,431 1 0 2 91 7,028 1 0 2 99 I T3M 6,536 1 0 2 92 7,143 2 0 3 101 (30 LEDs) I T4M 6,449 1 0 2 91 7,047 1 0 2 99 TFTM 6,444 1 0 2 91 7,042 1 0 2 99 US 8,697 2 0 2 80 9,501 2 0 2 87 I T2M 8,462 2 0 2 78 9,244 2 0 2 85 1000 109W I BS fL1rff01V1A One Lithonia Way • Conyers, Georgia 30012 • Phone: 800.279.8041 • Fax: 770.918.1209 • www.lithonia.com DSXW2-LED L/GHT/NG © 2012-2014 Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc. All rights reserved. Rev. 09/17/14 8,588 1 0 2 79 9,381 2 0 2 86 I T3M 8,728 2 0 3 80 9,534 2 0 3 87 I T4M 8,611 1 0 2 79 9,407 2 0 2 86 I TFTM 8,604 2 0 2 79 9,399 2 0 2 86 fL1rff01V1A One Lithonia Way • Conyers, Georgia 30012 • Phone: 800.279.8041 • Fax: 770.918.1209 • www.lithonia.com DSXW2-LED L/GHT/NG © 2012-2014 Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc. All rights reserved. Rev. 09/17/14 Performance Data El Lumen Ambient Temperature (LAT) Multipliers Use these factors to determine relative lumen output for average ambient temperatures from 0-40°C (32-104°F). 0°C 320F 1.02 100C 50°F 1.01 20°C 687 1.00 25'C 77'F 1.00 30°C 867 1.00 40°C 104°F 0.98 Projected LED Lumen Maintenance Data references the extrapolated performance projections for the DSXW2 LED 30C 1000 platform in a 25°C ambient, based on 10,000 hours of LED testing (tested per IESNA LM - 80 -08 and projected per IESNA TM -21-11). To calculate LLF, use the lumen maintenance factor that corresponds to the desired number of operating hours below. For other lumen maintenance values, contact factory. Electrical Load W� 120 208 240 277 347 480 350 25W 0.23 0.13 0.12 0.10 - - 530 36W 0.33 0.19 0.17 0.14 - - 20C 700 47W 0.44 0.25 0.22 0.19 - - 1000 73W 0.68 0.39 0.34 0.29 - - 350 36W 0.33 0.19 0.17 0.14 - - 530 54W 0.50 0.29 0.25 0.22 - - 30C 700 71 W 0.66 0.38 0.33 0.28 0.23 0.16 1000 109 W 1.01 0.58 0.50 0.44 - - To see complete photometric reports or download .ies files for this product, visit Lithonia Lighting's D -Series Wall Size 2 homepage. Isofootcandle plots for the DSXW2 LED 30C 1000 40K. Distances are in units of mounting height (25'). LEGEND 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 s a 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 - 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 ■ c 4 I I I c 4 0.1 fc ■3 0 3 0.5 fc $ $ 1.0 fc 1-1 1 ,flT N� 6 -3 ' -12M z Z y T3M Z Z vw A Fw .4 FEATURES & SPECIFICATIONS INTENDED USE The energy savings, long life and easy -to -install design of the D -Series Wall Size 2 make it the smart choice for building -mounted doorway and pathway illumination for nearly anyfacility. CONSTRUCTION Two-piece die-cast aluminum housing has integral heat sinkfins to optimize thermal management through conductive and convective cooling. Modular design allows for ease of maintenance. The LED driver is mounted to the door to thermally isolate it from the light engines for low operating temperature and long life. Housing is completely sealed against moisture and environmental contaminants (IP65). FINISH Exterior parts are protected by a zinc -infused Super Durable TGIC thermoset powder coat finish that provides superior resistance to corrosion and weathering. A tightly controlled multi -stage process ensures a minimum 3 mils thickness for a finish that can withstand extreme climate changes without cracking or peeling. Available in textured and non -textured finishes. OPTICS Precision -molded proprietary acrylic lenses provide multiple photometric distributions tailored specifically to building mounted applications. Light engines are available in 3000 K (80 min. CRI), 4000 K (70 min. CRI) or 5000 K (70 CRI) configurations. ELECTRICAL Light engine(s) consist of 10 high -efficacy LEDs mounted to a metal -core circuit board to maximize heat dissipation and promote long life (L87/100,000 hrs at 25°C). Class 1 electronic drivers have a power factor >90%, THD <20%, and a minimum 2.5KV surge rating. When ordering the SPD option, a separate surge protection device is installed within the luminaire which meets a minimum Category C Low (perANSI/IEEE C62.41.2). Distribution overlay comparison to 40OW metal halide. 4 L LEGEND v DSXW2, 0 0.5 fc U ■ TWF2, 0.5 fc 10' W sidewalk LLDs: TWF2 =0.72 DSXW2 =0.95 TWF2: DSXW2: d 458W 109W T3S ? N DSXW2 LED MC 40K 1000 T2M, I m TWF2 400M Pulse, 25' Mounting Ht INSTALLATION Included universal mounting bracket attaches securely to any 4" round or square outlet box for quick and easy installation. Luminaire has a slotted gasket wireway and attaches to the mounting bracket via corrosion -resistant screws. LISTINGS CSA certified to U.S. and Canadian standards. Rated for -40°C minimum ambient. Design Lights Consortium® (DLC) qualified product. Not all versions of this product may be DLC qualified. Please check the DLC Qualified Products List at www.designlights.org to confirm which versions are qualified. WARRANTY Five year limited warranty. Full warranty terms located at www.acurtybrands.com/ Cu stom e r Resou rces/Terms_a n d_co n d iti o ns. aspx. Note: Specifications subject to change without notice fL1rffV)V1A One Lithonia Way • Conyers, Georgia 30012 • Phone: 800.279.8041 • Fax: 770.918.1209 • www.lithonia.com DSXW2-LED L/GHT/NG 0 2012-2014 Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc. All rights reserved. Rev. 09/17/14 f P i1a�+ in �' `Tryi� �� r1► A�"f ;i a t �.c + � t .P�'is • � i t r r 1 . � �°i1 ,� ��,��:t�'i rtir\�,�• +k�T! J �Ke �• ,, i� o- yerfi -�l� rT"r'' t� �!' ,!. vo s, ' •- r 1.J i. P 7 r� . y+. .i � N� n.! �• 'Ow S T„YI►"'. +'♦Y : i +��I:',I + n ,�'/ T�fti /'a'� °7 F a'. 'J.,r �p J + �s �� "jfL'��//rt � � -:f� u.. �I.a' r F.. •i> i lJf .. .+. � •i'��"��,�y1 fir/ A � {. � 0+*.4 `. ;,_+ y` r yn,yv 1J�I AQ + 1 �Z �v Y;� h+ ala l,+ • � j �/• / fI - ,'�f y�t .�'S�"r9PWAfir r � 3 . cy +, s �j,,�lJy t>'.ri .�►fi "+ � .� s �., ori y�"�/r ��!'''� r • 'E+ r � f: ' + �'� r�./f� 1'-��.f!/ i.t �. ��i •'' / "�� 11�!q%(��j .� - f+5- ,. c A r�P �♦. d j'Pw� n ry - � . Y"7�✓d� fr [r3,� F� �r i/''rff `� + N~If�ls �i�' nye f+ �y°r„��.' r l,,r�s fJ'i M� ` j r.'�' . i' � f . `� f . 'mr 5yA1,t _�V' y i i '! ci £ I/�� I ®r"l {�!�/r 4 .01< 7 rya 'F• , �'St �' 1� bjj �Z��-�y� G Mr X ••� '{fly ,,# 99ml :Reiaf 5 Ifl ESTOPRio �� t1 I�1 1 F - \ 1 -Vic . ` 1 J ,\ F � • J � 'i f •� J�� t .. r�\ F - \ WSB Building a legacy — your legacy. May 31, 2018 Ms. Angela Schumann Community Development Director City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1 Monticello, MN 55362 Re: Brigg's Properties City Project No. 2018-008 WSB Project No. 011673-000 Dear Ms. Schumann: 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763-541-4800 Fax: 763-541-1700 We have reviewed the revised civil plans and comment letter from the applicant's engineer dated May 14, 2018 and offer the following additional comments based on revised civil plans and meeting with the applicant on May 30, 2018: Grading and Erosion Control Plan An overland emergency overflow route with drainage arrows should be shown on the plans. The catch basin at the northeast corner of the parking lot is not an acceptable emergency overflow system, since if the storm sewer system plugs, runoff will not be able to enter the storm sewer. After discussing with the applicant, the emergency overflow will be directed to the underground parking area which is not ideal due to risk of property damage and maintenance issues. The applicant has indicated it is not feasible to raise the elevation of the site, given existing conditions and grades needed to accommodate ADA access to address this issue, therefore a storm sewer pipe will be constructed to accommodate the overflow and will connect to the trench drain at the underground parking ramp. The applicant shall provide design calculations for the storm sewer to accommodate a 100 year- 24 hr rainfall volume in the event that the surface parking lot drainage plugs. 2. It is not clear if the emergency overflow route will also encroach on the adjacent properties. Additional adjacent parking area elevations and lowest opening elevations of adjacent buildings should be shown on the plans to demonstrate that these facilities will be a minimum 1.5 foot above the emergency overflow elevation of the site. 3. Identify % grades for turf areas around the building. 4. The applicant's engineer has indicated that drainage from the underground parking lot will be directed to a sump pump that will discharge to the existing storm sewer stub off of Locust Street. This method of discharge is discouraged due to risks from failure of the pump resulting in flooding and does not provide for the required emergency overland Equal Opportunity Employer wsbeng.com K:\02596-420\P.dmin\Docs\050817 submittal Brigg's Properties May 31, 2018 Page 2 flow route. However, due to site constraint's, the applicant has indicated it is not feasible to raise the elevation of the site to eliminate the sump pump system. In addition, the lowest opening entry to the underground parking lot is proposed to be 1 foot, instead of the minimum 1.5 foot above the emergency overflow elevation of the site. A portion of the storm sewer between CB #1 and #2 is less than the 4 -foot depth requirement and will be susceptible to freezing. For these reasons, a storm water maintenance agreement will be required for the site and the development agreement will include language indemnifying the City from any damages arising from the design and construction of the site and structure and that the property owner shall be responsible for any and all flooding and associated property damage to the structure, appurtenances and tenants' property. 5. The sump pump system for the underground parking lot shall be designed to meet MN Building Code requirements for secondary containment in the event that of pump/power failure. The system should be designed so that water will not backflow through the system and into the garage. 6. The underground parking lot ramp grade exceeds the maximum 10% design slope and should be reviewed for ease of access. The applicant has indicated they will heat the ramp to prevent icing. Site and Utilitv Plan 7. Decorative street lighting and colored brick pattern boulevard treatments should extend along 3rd Street and Locust Street to match what exists along Walnut Street have been provided to the applicant. City staff will provide the width required for the brick pattern boulevard. 8. A sidewalk easement should be provided to the City where the sidewalk encroaches outside of the street right of way. The applicant shall provide legal descriptions and exhibits for the sidewalk easement needed. The City will provide the easement document for recording. Please give me a call at 763-271-3236 if you have any questions or comments regarding this letter. Thank you. Sincerely, WSB & Associates, Inc. / t, 4 sOql Shibani K. Bisson, PE City Engineer K:\011673-000\Admin\Docs\Ltr Aschumann- Brigg's 053118.docx Brigg's Properties May 31, 2018 Page 3 skb K:\011673-000\Admin\Docs\Ltr Aschumann- Brigg's 053118.docx EXHIBIT Z Rivertown Residential Suites Response 5-14-18 1. Briggs Companies Certifies that all underground spaces will be available to be occupied 2. The building Development Stage design has Cultured Stone from grade up to 8 Feet in height on Front, Rear, and West elevation, and the East Elevation has 4 - foot wanes coat of cultured stone. The Front entrance has advanced in Development Stage per Colored Rendering Concept on or before 5-21-18 3. Included in number 2. 4. Bucks Country Cultured Stone Veneer (See Sample Board) 5" EDCO Sage Steel siding (See Sample Board) Ivory White Aluminum Trim Coil Wraps and accents. Duration 40 -year Shingles 5. Blue Prints in process subject to Civil Approval 6. See Revised Civil and Pending Landscape plans to accommodate a 4 -foot buffer and Natural Privacy Fence. Civil plans submitted on 5-15-18. Landscape plan submitted on or before 5-25-18 7. See Revised Landscape plan for Natural Privacy Fence. Landscape plan submitted on or before 5-25-18 8. See Revised Landscape plan for Natural Privacy Fence. Landscape plan submitted on or before 5-25-18 9. See Revised Landscape plan for revisions. Landscape plan submitted on or before 5-25-18 10. See attached Lighting Plan. Signage Plan for building & Site on or before 5-21- 18 11. See Revised Civil drawings. Stamped Stained Concrete in front of City Hall. See Picture attached 12. See Revised Civil Plans submitted 5-15-18 13. N/A 14. See Revised Civil Plans submitted 5-15-18 15. We will do our best to try and accommodate as many recommendations as we can. 16. Street lighting in Development Stage (Pending Specification Sheet provided by City) Applicant Unit count to resized 47 by removing previous amenities and adding 3 studios. We still meet the 1.5 stalls per unit. 47x1.5=70 stalls Applicant is willing and privileged to exceed all expectations to construct and pay for all off-street bituminous pavement & striping, Street Lighting, Sidewalks, Landscaping, and Plantings. Applicant is happy to add additional Natural Privacy Fencing & rock beds to detour unwanted pedestrian and traffic circulation through neighboring properties. Listing Contact Information Engineer: Stark Engineering, Wayne Stark 320-249-2611- wavnes(cr�,starkenizineer.com Surveyor: Duffy Engineering, Barry Dorniden 320-258-2906- barrvdaduffven2.com Applicant: Monticello Rivertown Residential Suites, Patrick Briggs 612-919-1561- pat(a)thebri2f4scompanies. corn www_starkengineer.com 320-249-2611 ENGINEERING Sauk Rapids, Minnesota MEMORANDUM Date: 5/14/2018 By: Wayne C.B. Stark, P.E. To: Shibani Bisson, P.E., Monticello City Engineer Project: Third Street Apartments (City Project #2018-008) Subject: Civil Engineering Response to City Review Comments Civil Engineering Site Planning Sustainable Design On April 30, 2018, 1 received a copy of your plan review comment for this project as submitted to Ms. Angela Schumann, the City Community Development Director. The preliminary plans have been revised and are submitted to you for review and comment. I would like to offer the following as further clarification to address each of them: Gradina and Erosion Control Plan Drainage from the site is proposed to be directed to trench drains located at the top of the ramp to the underground parking area. The lowest opening entry to the underground parking and building is required to be minimum 1.5 foot above the emergency overflow elevation of the site. This requirement does not appear to be met and will be a requirement of plan approval. The applicant indicated they will raise the elevation of the site to accommodate this requirement. The grading plan has been revised so that the lowest opening elevation for the proposed building (top of the ramp to the underground garage) is 925.70. The emergency overflow elevation is the proposed catch basin rim of 924.70 which is 1 foot below this elevation. The drainage area flowing to this catch basin is 17,718 square feet (or 0.41 acres). Using the rational method with a runoff coefficient of 0.77 for this drainage area and a 10 -year storm intensity of 5.63 inches per hour, the design flow (Q) equals 1.77 cubic feet per second (CFS) to the two catch basins within this drainage area. The proposed 15" RCP has a capacity of 5.48 CFS while the Type V grates for the proposed catch basins have a combined capacity of 2.8 CFS. 2. The emergency overflow elevations and routes from all low points along with directional flow arrows should be shown on the plan. The emergency overflow elevation (catch basin rim) and proposed slopes between spot elevations are shown on the plan. 3. The applicant's engineer has indicated that drainage from the underground parking lot will be directed to a sump pump that will discharge to the existing storm sewer stub off of Locust Street. This method of discharge is discouraged due to risks from failure of the pump resulting in flooding. Gravity flow is recommended. If gravity flow cannot be accommodated, the applicant shall describe the rational for this and submit sump pump design, operation Page 1 of 4 and maintenance plans for review by the City in conformance with City's stormwater design requirements and the Minnesota Plumbing Code. Because of site constraints including adjacent curb elevations, ADA requirements and existing storm sewer depths, gravity flow is not feasible due to the underground garage floor at elevation 921.75 and the proposed manhole invert at elevation 921.47. The external trench drain at the bottom of the ramp to the underground garage will be connected to the roof drain system and a sump pump that discharges to the proposed storm sewer manhole. Sump pump design, operation and maintenance plans for the garage will be submitted to the City as part of the building permit process. 4. Existing contours shall be shown at one or two foot intervals shown with dashed lines and screened. The contours shall extend beyond the proposed site boundaries a minimum of 200 feet or as necessary to completely show the limits of a drainage basin not fully contained within the proposed site. A drainage area map should be provided identifying onsite and offsite drainage patterns along with existing adjacent parking area elevations and lowest opening elevations of adjacent buildings to demonstrate that these facilities will be a minimum 1.5 foot above the emergency overflow elevation of the site. The existing contour elevations have been added to Sheet C-2. A drainage map showing the parking lot drainage is attached while the roof drainage will connect to the proposed onsite storm sewer. The remaining adjacent turf areas around the building will overland flow to Locust Street and Third Street. 5. Proposed contours are not shown on the plans and shall be shown at one or two foot intervals shown with solid lines per the City's Design Manual. Proposed contours have been added to Sheet C-2. 6. Identify how drainage will be accommodated for the swale along the east property line. Proposed contours have been added in this area to address the drainage along the east property line. 7. Identify where roof drainage will be directed. It should not be directed to sidewalk areas in order to avoid standing water and freezing, resulting in safety and maintenance issues. Roof drainage will be piped underground to a sump pump that will discharge to the proposed storm sewer manhole. 8. Show the proposed storm sewer with top of casting and invert elevations on the grading plan. The proposed storm sewer information is shown on the Site and Utility Plan (Sheet C-1). 9. Identify grades for turf areas around the building. Proposed grades and contours for the turf areas around the building have been added to Sheet C-2. 10. Grading, drainage and erosion control shall comply with City's zoning ordinance. See Chapter 4, section 4.10 related to grading, drainage, stormwater management and erosion control and the City's Design Manual- updated May 2017 located on the City's website - Engineering department. Sheet C-2 has been updated per the grading, drainage and erosion control requirements of the City's zoning ordinance. The construction documents will include project specifications as well as temporary and permanent erosion and sediment control requirements for the project site. Page 2 of 4 11. Inlet protection should be provided adjacent to the site. Inlet protection has been added to the plan. 12. The storm sewer within Locust Street was designed to accommodate runoff from the site based on a 10 -year rainfall event. Provide proposed catch basin inlet capacity calculations. Catch basins should be designed with sufficient capacity to limit ponding to maximum depth of 0.3 feet for a 10 -year rainfall event. Catch basin inlet capacity calculations are addressed in the response to Comment #1 above. 13. A stormwater maintenance agreement may be required. A template will be provided to the applicant. Since no stormwater BMPs are required for this project, a stormwater maintenance agreement should not be required. 14. If 1 acre or more is disturbed, an NPDES/SDS Construction Storm Water General Permit (CSWGP) shall be provided with the grading permit or with the building permit application for review, prior to construction commencing. If less than 1 acre is disturbed, a grading permit shall be applied for from the City if proposed construction is to start prior to building permit apprnvnl The total disturbed area for this project is 0.93 acres, therefore an NPDES/SDS Construction Storm Water General Permit is not required. A grading permit will be applied for from the City prior to any construction on the site. Site and Utilitv Plan 15. A 6 -foot, not 5 -foot wide, sidewalk should be constructed along the property fronting 3rd Street and Locust Street per City standard detail plate No. 5012. The back of the sidewalk should be aligned 1 -foot off the right of way. The site plan (Sheet C-1) has been updated accordingly. 16. Dimension the driveway access width The driveway access width, which is the same as the drive aisle, is dimensioned on Sheet C-1. 17. Decorative street lighting and brick pattern boulevard treatments should extend along 3rd Street and Locust Street to match what exists along Walnut Street. Decorative street lighting along 3rd Street and Locust Street will be constructed to match what exists along Walnut Street. The sidewalk along 3rd Street and Locust Street will be stamped concrete to match what exists in front of the City Hall. 18. Per the City's design standards all storm sewer pipe shall have a minimum diameter of 15 inches. Proposed storm sewer has been upsized to 15" diameter. 19. Carcn basins should have a minimum depth of four feet to prevent freezing. Due to the existing storm sewer pipe invert elevations, 4' deep catch basins are not feasible. The Owner has been made aware of this issue and they will be maintained accordingly (steamed out if frozen) 20. Sanitary sewer cleanouts should be spaced a maximum 70 -feet apart. Sanitary sewer cleanout spacing is per the Minnesota Plumbing Code. Page 3 of 4 21. The proposed water service shall be installed with a minimum 7.5 feet of cover. A note has been added to Sheet C-1 to address this issue. 22. Show any irrigation connections to the watermain service and show the irrigation layout on the plans. If an irrigation system is proposed, it will be design -build and will be submitted to the City as part of the building permit process. 23. A note should be added to the plans that the City will not be responsible for any additional costs incurred that is associated with variations in the utility as -built elevations. These items shall be verified in the field prior to construction. The note addressing this issue has been updated on Sheet C-1. 24. A utility excavation permit must be obtained from the Public Works department prior to commencement of utility connections. So noted. 25. Provide an as -built utility plan once construction is complete. So noted. Other 26. Applicable detail plates shall be updated per the City's April 2017 General Specifications and Standard Detail Plates for Street and Utility Construction located on the City's website- Enaineerina deaartment. Applicable detail plates will be included in the construction documents. 27. The plans should reference compliance with the City of Monticello General Specifications and Standard Detail Plates for Street and Utility Construction The construction documents will reference compliance to the City of Monticello General Specifications and Standard Detail Plates for Street and Utility Construction. 28. The plans need to be signed by a licensed professional engineer. The construction documents will be signed by a licensed professional engineer Page 4 of 4 g28 \ A_ / S' } \ �c 14 \ \ 289£26\ \ \ \ \ \ \ g28 \ A_ / S' } \ �c 14 \ \ in the Downtown area. Civic uses draw in people from across the community. During the planning process, the potential for allowing commercial activity to extend easterly out of the Downtown along Broadway was discussed. The Comprehensive Plan consciously defines Cedar Street as the eastern edge of Downtown for two basic reasons: (1) Downtown should be successful and sustainable before new areas of competition are created; and (2) The Comprehensive Plan seeks to maintain and enhance the integrity of residential neighborhoods east of Downtown. More than any other land use category, Downtown has strong connections to other parts of the Comprehensive Plan. Therefore the City has adopted the Downtown Small Area Plan as its guiding planning document for the Downtown. The following parts of the Comprehensive Plan also address community desires and plans for the Downtown area: 10. 10. 10. The Land Use chapter contains a specific focus area on Downtown. The focus area contains a more detailed discussion of the issues facing the Downtown and potential public actions needed to address these issues. The operation of the street system is a critical factor for the future of Downtown. The Transportation chapter of the Comprehensive Plan and the Transportation Framework of the Downtown Small Area Plan influence the ability of residents to travel to Downtown and the options for mitigating the impacts of traffic on Highway 25 and other Downtown streets. The Parks chapter of the Comprehensive Plan and the Parks & Open Space Framework of the Downtown Small Area Plan provide for parks in the Downtown and the trail systems that allow people to reach Downtown on foot or bicycle. The Economic Development chapter of the Comprehensive Plan and the Implementation chapter of the Downtown Small Area Plan lay the foundation for public actions and investments that will be needed to achieve the desired outcomes. Goals - Downtown ► Improve Pine Street for all users. ► Shift the center of Downtown to Broadway and Walnut Streets ► Encourage Small and Medium Scaled Investments ► Become a River Town Policies/Guiding Principles - Downtown 1. Downtown is a special and unique part of Monticello. It merits particular attention in the Comprehensive Plan and in future efforts to achieve community plans and objectives. 2. Downtown is intended to be an inter -connected and supportive collection of land uses. Land uses should support and enhance the overall objectives for Downtown. 3. The City will build on core assets of greater Downtown Monticello as identified in the Downtown Small Area Plan. These assets include the preponderance of civic activity, proximity to the river, a grid of streets and small blocks, and a varied building stock - both old and new. 4. A shared vision among property owners, business owners and the City is the foundation for effective team work and long term success. 5. A shared understanding of realistic market potential is the foundation for design and generation of a healthy mix of land uses. This includes both residential and non-residential land uses. Housing the core blocks is encouraged to be medium density (apartments or townhouses) and to face the perimeter of the blocks and be pedestrian friendly, either with street level commercial uses or doors, stoops, porches, plazas, or other features that face the sidewalk. 6. A safe, attractive human scale environment and entrepreneurial businesses that actively emphasize personal customer service will differentiate Downtown from other shopping districts. 7. Property values can be enhanced if property owners and the City share a vision for Downtown and actively seek to cultivate a safe, appealing environment and attractive mix of inter -related uses. 3-14 1 Land Use City of Monticello 8. Housing in the Downtown can facilitate necessary redevelopment and bring potential customers directly into the area. Housing may be free- standing or in shared buildings with street level commercial uses. 9. Downtown is the civic center of Monticello. To the degree possible, unique public facilities (such as the Community Center, the Library and the Post Office) should be located in the Downtown area as a means to bring people into the Downtown. 10. Downtown should emphasize connections with the Mississippi River that are accessible by the public. It is especially important to design Broadway so it is easy and safe to cross as a pedestrian or cyclist - with an emphasis on Walnut and Cedar Streets. 11. Downtown should be a pedestrian -oriented place in a manner that cannot be matched by other commercial districts. Pedestrian scale is achieved at the scale of both the block and the building. Blocks should reflect the historic fabric of the City and buildings should present a pedestrian friendly facade to the sidewalk. 12. Downtown should have an adequate supply of free parking for customers distributed throughout the area. The Downtown should be well connected so customers are comfortable walking 1-2 blocks from their car to their destination. 13. The City and business community must work actively with MnDOT to ensure safe local access to the Downtown. All of these policies work together to attract people to Downtown and to enhance the potential for a successful Downtown environment. Mixed Use The Mixed Use is a transition area between the Downtown and the hospital campus. It has been created in recognition of the unique nature of this area. The area serves two functions. It is the edge between long-term residential neighborhoods and a major transportation corridor (Broadway Street). It is also a link between the Downtown, the hospital campus and the east interchange retail area. The primary goal of this land use is to preserve and enhance housing in this part of Monticello. Any non-residential development should be designed to minimize the impacts on and conflicts with adjacent neighborhoods. Policies - Mixed Use Development should not have direct access to Broadway street. Access should come from side street. 2. Non-residential development should be limited to small retail, service and office businesses. The scale, character and site design should be compatible with the adjacent residential neighborhoods. 3. All non-residential development will be oriented to Broadway Street and not to 3rd Street or River Street. 4. Commercial development compatible with the Downtown should be encouraged to locate there. 5. More intense housing and commercial uses maybe allowed if directly related to the hospital. Places to Recreate Places to Recreate consist of public parks and private recreation facilities. The land uses are essential elements of the quality of life in Monticello. The Parks and Trails chapter of the Comprehensive Plan describes the current park and trail system and the future plan to maintain and enhance this system. The Comprehensive Plan is only one aspect of managing the land use for public parks and private recreation facilities. The City's zoning regulations place these locations into a zoning district. Often, the purpose of the zoning district is to guide private development, such as housing. Under current State Law, zoning regulations "trump" the Land Use Plan and govern the use of land. With the potential for the redevelopment of golf courses, it is important the Comprehensive Plan and other land use controls work in concert to achieve the desired outcomes. The City's plans and policies for parks, trails and open space can be found in the Parks chapter of the Comprehensive Plan 2008 Comprehensive Plan — Updated 2017 Land Use 1 3-15 Frameworks Land Use, Open Space and Transportation are the three frameworks that organize and define the physical environment. As with systems in the human body, each must function independently - and together with - the others. If one fails, they all fail. This is why it is important to understand frameworks as individual systems that must function as part of a single Downtown. The Plan is also divided into frameworks in order to allow different agencies, departments, and investors act in concert with each other. This will help ensure public and private investments are coordinated, less risky, and more publicly acceptable. Framework: Open Space and Parks (Primary recommednations) • Improve Riverfront Parks to accommodate more programming and events • Redesign Walnut Street and River Street to allow for park extention during events • Convert vacant lots on Broadway to small pocket parks • Utilize River islands for additional natural park space • Create pedestrian refuges or enhanced building entry ways on the corners of blocks along Pine Street • Enliven open spaces with public art wherever possible Framework: Access and Circulation • Emphasize connectivity throughout the Core, with pedestrian and bike friendly streets, a complete sidewalk system, and connectivity to the in -town neighborhoods. • Promote a "complete streets" policy that balances the needs of all users in the Downtown. • Manage and improve the grid system to support connectivity and access throughout Downtown • Work with MnDOT to improve Pine Street for users of Downtown Monticello, including additional signals, maintaining the River Street signal and supporting an additional river crossing • Improve pedestrian crossings of Broadway at Walnut and Cedar to improve access to the Riverfront • Reconnect Walnut Street with River Street Framework: Development and Land Use • Riverfront District with destination restaurant and entertainment uses, as well as housing • Broadway District with shopfront retail and restaurant uses beneath housing and offices • In -town neighborhoods extend to Walnut and Cedar Street with new infill housing 2-4 stories (apartments and townhouses) Additional recomendations are included in the Framewoirks Section pages 25-32 Open Space and Parks ' V Access and Circulation Development and land Use Immediate Next Steps and Implementation 1. Improve the physical environment with streetscape, benches, programming, and art. 2. Bolster Broadway with a facade improvement program and retail recruitment. 3. Aggressively market development opportunities such as Block 52 and infill housing on Walnut and Cedar Street 4. Enact the appropriate policies, programs and incentives that enable the type of development described in the Plan. How is This Plan Related to the Embracing Downtown Plan and the Comprehensive Plan? In 2010, the City of Monticello completed the "Embracing Downtown Plan". The full area considered to be "Downtown Monticello"extends from Interstate I-94 to the Mississippi River, and generally from Cedar Street to Maple Street. The Embracing Downtown Plan was adopted as an appendix to the Comprehensive Plan. Changes in the retail marketplace overall, and more specifically market changes and reinvestments in downtown Monticello, have created a need to develop a new planning perspective for the core blocks of the downtown. This document therefore is an update to the 2008 Monticello Comprehensive Plan and to the Embracing Downtown Plan for the Downtown. This Plan will replace the Embracing Downtown plan as an appendix to the Comprehensive Plan. City of Monticello Downtown Small Area Plan I Executive Summary 0 Project Goals I Shift the Center and Double Down on Broadway. Over time the travel and use patterns of Downtown have changed - altering the overall experience of downtown. Up until 1960, despite Broadway's designation as a State Highway (152) most travel was local. However, as the region grew, Monticello became a crossroads - thereby burdening Broadway and Pine Street with high volumes of through traffic and widened streets. Today, the Broadway / Pine Street intersection is one of the most traveled intersections in the region. Whereas that quality makes for great visibility, it also makes for a poor pedestrian experience and poor access to adjacent properties. Broadway, west of Pine Street, is relatively lightly traveled and unlike Broadwway east of Pine Street, it has retained its pedestrian scale. Furthermore, the City has developed successful parks at the end of Cedar Street and Walnut Street. Therefore, an opportunity exists to fully extend Walnut and Cedar Street down to the park and grow the downtown mercantile district towards the riverfront along Broadway. Improve the Pine Street Experience for Everyone. Whether passing through Monticello along Pine Street (TH 25), trying to cross Pine Street by foot, or going to a business along Pine Street, the experience of using Pine Street is generally a negative one for all users. The environment of Pine Street projects a negative image and it is a divider between the east and west side of the town. Whereas Pine Street will always be a heavily traveled street, it does not need to be a negative experience. The community can take it back, claiming it for more appropriate development types, making it safer, more pleasant, and attractive for all users. noo 000 noo nnn nnn°nnn nnn nn nn nn nn inn Lots of Small Investments, a few medium ones and just one or two big ones. Monticello, despite it's growth, is proud to be a small town. Small towns develop charm and character through a series of small incremental investments that together add up to help a place become memorable and beloved. Simple investments such as new awnings, improved lighting and well maintained landscaping can make a big impression. Small buildings that fit on vacant parcels or otherwise underutilized land can happen quickly - adding vitality to a community. By promoting a high quantity of smaller investments (1/4 block and smaller) and medium scaled redevelopment projects (up to 1/2 block in scale), the Downtown will become more diverse, more lively, more responsive and adaptable to changes in the market place. A few medium scaled investments, warranted by a strong market or a strategic need, are important and valuable. But they should be carefully scaled and implemented so as to not disrupt the fragile fabric of the small town. Engage and love the riverfront. Go beyond the Swan. Great places have unique assets that differentiate them from others. Monticello has the Mississippi River. This defining feature can be further utilized to the benefit of Monticello residents and businesses. A riverfront that is well connected with blue and green trails, is publicly accessible and is activated throughout the day and the year can become a defining feature for the City and an important driver of economic activity. City of Monticello Small Area Plan I Goals and Objectives Walnut Street and Cedar Street Walnut and Cedar Streets Character Area: The recommendations and guidelines on this page pertain to the area colored on this diagram Walnut Street and Cedar Street are important corridors to the River as well as transitions between the commercial areas of downtown and the in -town neighborhoods. In order to perform in this capacity, the Plan encourages new housing to infill vacant lots and eventually for single family housing to transition to medium density housing. Live/work units or small service/production (such as insurance agent or jewelry maker) are permitted. In addition, the Plan recommends improvements to the street that will accommodate pedestrian and bike access to the River. This includes parallel parking, aligned sidewalks and crosswalks, and curb extensions at Broadway. 69.1 a r, Create a pedestrian promenade to the O Encourage new housing to face Walnut and Cedar Street, with 0 Riverfront with wide continuous sidewalks and multiple doors facing the street. well marked crosswalksO Locate all parking towards the middle of the block, accessed Infill vacant lots and redevelop underutilized via a rear lane shared with other properties on the block. 0 parcels with housing in small apartments or townhouses. Small service or production Encourage small and medium scaled residential buildings uses are permitted within these and existing a wal5 stories, 1/4 to 1/2 block) that prioritize pedestrian scale and walkability. buildings. Perspective along Walnut Street, looking north towards the River. ; I I r Y4P P� �< X X I 8' 12' 8' I< ., _ ID L Y CD m PI X X 24' 8' 12' 8' 80' ROW River Street Broadway 3rd Street as 0� 0,� g 4th Street s� v„ a 5th Street tracks a � C ' 0 7th Street v Walnut Street Promenade to the River Y Proposed Parallel Parking Section of Walnut and Cedar Street On -street parking is important throughout Downtown. Parallel parking will not require an easement and is desireable in front of residential buildings. Diagonal parking requires an easement and yields 50% more parking spaces. City of Monticello Downtown Small Area Plan I Character Areas M Walnut Street and Cedar Street Guidelines Precedent Images Facade and Frontage • Porches and/ or dooryards are encouraged for all ground floor residential units. • Dormers and bay windows are encouraged to create a pedestrian scaled facade • Upper story balconies are encouraged. • Courtyards are permitted along 1/2 of a front property line. Public Realm • 6'-10' sidewalk, aligned across intersections and along the front of blocks. • On street parking for visitors to Downtown • Clearly marked crosswalks to accommodate pedestrian and bike access between the Community Center and the Riverfront Massing and Orientation • Buildings should be between 2 and 4 stories. • Buildings should be primarily oriented to Walnut and Cedar Street to create a comfortable pedestrian environment. • Dormers and roof articulations should be used to reduce the scale of buildings if buildings are longer than 100' in length. Building Use and Location • Primarily residential uses between the Civic Center and Walnut Street. Small scale service and commercial businesses permitted on corner of 4th and Cedar and 4th and Walnut. Buildings oriented toward front (street) and front corners City of Monticello Downtown Small Area Plan I Character Areas M City Council Agenda: 06/25/2018 2P. Consideration of approving a vreliminary and final plat and development contract for Oakwood 3rd Addition, a two lot subdivision in the I-2 (Heavy Industrial) District. Applicant: Platinum Technologies. (NAC) Property: Legal: Lot 6, Block 2, Oakwood Industrial Park Address: 219 Dundas Road Planning Case Number: 2018-021 A. REFERENCE & BACKGROUND Request(s): Preliminary and Final Plat; Planning Commission is asked to review and recommend as related to the preliminary plat Deadline for Decision: July 81h, 2018 (60 days), September 6th, 2018 (120 days for plat) Land Use Designation: Places to Work Zoning Designation: I-2 — Heavy Industrial The purpose of the "I-2," heavy industrial, district is to provide for the establishment of heavy industrial and manufacturing development and use which because of the nature of the product or character of activity requires isolation from residential or commercial use. Overlays/Environmental Regulations Applicable: Current Site Use: Surrounding Land Uses: North: East: South: West: MM Vacant/Agriculture I-94 Vacant/Proposed Commercial Industrial Industrial Project Description: The applicant proposes to subdivide the property to create two parcels for industrial development. Lot 1 would be 1.49 acres in area with frontage on Fallon Avenue, consisting of the north portion of the property in question and Lot 2, with 3.81 acres and the existing frontage at the corner of Dundas and Fallon Avenue (and which contains the existing building and related improvements). City Council Agenda: 06/25/2018 ANALYSIS In the I-2 District, lots are required to be at least 100 feet in width, and have at least 30,000 square feet of area (about .7 acres). Both of the proposed lots easily exceed these dimensions. Lot 1 will have 175 feet of frontage on Fallon and 1.49 acres, while Lot 2 will have 360 feet of frontage on Dundas (630 feet along Fallon), and a total of 3.81 acres of lot area. The applicant's proposed plat has provided the required perimeter drainage and utility easements along streets and at the perimeter of the plat boundary (12 feet), and along interior lot lines (6 feet on both sides of the common lot line). Fallon Avenue is shown at its current right-of-way width of 33 feet on the west side of the centerline, and 40 feet on the east side of the centerline. The applicants should revise the plat to provide additional right of wide on the west side of Fallon Avenue, in accordance with the City Engineer's recommendation. The lot line is proposed to divide the existing parcel leaving a lot width on the north lot of 175 feet along Fallon Avenue. This property line would result in an existing unimproved storage area and fence straddling the new property line. The applicant should, as a condition of plat approval, relocate the fence and other gravel surfaces to be located entirely on Lot 2, together with the existing building and parking areas. The provided plans indicate fence relocation. The City Engineer has reviewed the plat and has provided a comment letter with recommendations. These include removal of the northerly Lot 2 access on Fallon Ave with development or use of the property. Fallon Ave is a collector road and a minimum 200 foot spacing is recommended. The other existing access points line up with the accesses on the east side of the road, which is preferred. The City Engineer has also noted that there are no existing sewer and water services to the proposed Lot 1. A new sewer service will need to extend from the main in the street. A new water service will need to extend from the watermain located in the ditch along the east side of Fallon Avenue. Any newly established uses on the proposed lots will be reviewed at the time of development for any required land use approvals. The proposed plat appears to meet the requirements of the Subdivision and Zoning Ordinances, as proposed. The primary revision would be a requirement for right-of- way dedication along Fallon Avenue and the elimination of the northerly of the two current accesses on Lot 2 when developed. Planning Commission Review & Recommendation The Planning Commission reviewed the preliminary plat on June 5th, 2019 and held a public hearing on the request. City Council Agenda: 06/25/2018 Commission confirmed with staff that when the lots are split, water and sewer would not be available. It was noted that the developer will be required to provide water and sewer from Fallon Avenue to Lot 1, Block 1 for development. It was also noted that one of the access points on Fallon Avenue would need to be removed to minimize access on a collector road. The Commission inquired if there would be any concerns of the use of the southern lot as a recycling facility for the users of northern lot. Staff stated that it is their understanding that the recycling facility operations have moved to a different location and that two new uses would be proposed. The Commission asked whether any condition should be added relative to the potential for required site clean-up, as the site was a recycling facility prior. It was noted that an industrial stormwater permit was required for the site and the permittee would have been required to monitor impact to stormwater. In addition, it is typical in a financing arrangement for land and/or development that some type of environmental review is required by the lender. Commission inquired whether a condition should be added to Exhibit Z. Staff stated that environmental impacts from the use would be a discussion for the buyer of the site and are not related to the plat standards review, which has been reconfirmed for Council's review. It should also be noted that the Planning Commission report incorrectly cited the date of the City Engineer's letter as May 30th, 2018. The correct date is May 25th, 2018 and has been revised accordingly in the Supporting Data and Exhibit Z conditions. After hearing and discussion, the Commission motioned unanimously to recommend approval of the preliminary plat. Development Contract The development contract for the site recognizes that the subdivision is intended to facilitate subdivision of a single parcel into two parcels for the future development of the northerly Lot 1, and possible redevelopment or reuse of Lot 2. The development contract requires that with development, reuse or redevelopment of the lots within the plat, development plans meeting the city's standards and ordinances will be required. An amendment to development agreement is anticipated at the time either of the lots is developed or redeveloped. The contract further requires a security for the placement of lot monuments for the new lot configuration. Other securities, such as site landscaping, will be required with development per the City's adopted fee schedule. In addition, the contract states that the developer will be required to obtain the necessary connection permit for the utility connection and will be required to submit a deposit for inspection for street repair for associated utility and access removal work on Fallon. 3 City Council Agenda: 06/25/2018 Trunk area charges will be applicable at the time of development for Lot 1, Block 1. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS Planning Commission recommended approval of the preliminary plat per Alternative #1 below. 1. Motion to adopt Resolution No. 2018-52, for approval of the Preliminary and Final Plat and development agreement for Oakwood Industrial Park Yd Addition, subject to the conditions noted in Exhibit Z, and based on the findings therein. 2. Motion to deny adoption of Resolution No. 2018-52, based on findings identified by the City Council. 3. Motion to table action on the Resolution, subject to additional information from staff and/or applicant. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends Alternative 1, approval of the Preliminary Plat, Final Plat and development agreement, with the Exhibit Z notes and conditions. The plat meets the requirements of the applicable zoning district, and with the conditions, will accommodate development in the area anticipated by the Comprehensive Plan. D. SUPPORTING DATA A. Resolution No. 2018-52 B. Resolution No. PC -2018-019 C. Aerial Site Image D. Applicant Narrative E. Preliminary Plat F. Final Plat G. City Engineer's Letter, dated May 25th, 2018 H. Development Contract — Draft I. Finance Plan - Draft Z. Conditions of Approval L! City Council Agenda: 06/25/2018 EXHIBIT Z Conditions of Approval for: Preliminary Plat for Oakwood Industrial Park 3rd Addition 1. Preliminary Plat is redrawn to reflect appropriate right-of-way dedication per recommendations of the City Engineer. 2. Remove northerly Lot 2 access on Fallon Ave with development or use of the property 3. Site conditions are modified to remove former storage area and fencing from the south boundary of Lot 1. 4. Recommendations of the City Engineers Report, dated May 25th, 2018, are incorporated into the Preliminary Plat. 5. Execution of Development Agreement as may be required. 6. Recommendations of other staff and Planning Commission. 5 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2018-52 APPROVING PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL 3" ADDITION WHEREAS, the Monticello Planning Commission held a public hearing on June 5th, 2018, for the consideration of the preliminary plat of the Oakwood Industrial Park 3rd Addition; and WHEREAS, after taking public comment, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the preliminary plat of the Oakwood Industrial Park 3rd Addition to the City Council; and WHEREAS, the Monticello City Council reviewed the recommendation of the Planning Commission and approved the preliminary plat of Oakwood Industrial Park 3rd Addition on June 25th, 2018; and WHEREAS, the Monticello City Council reviewed the final plat of Oakwood Industrial Park 3rd Addition on June 25th, 2018; and WHEAREAS, the preliminary and final plat for the Oakwood Industrial Park 3rd Addition identifies the specific plans and utilities for the proposed Oakwood Industrial Park 3rd Addition, subject to those conditions in Exhibit Z; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA, that the preliminary and final plat of the Oakwood Industrial Park 3rd Addition, with right of way, drainage and utility easements as required, is hereby approved contingent upon meeting all conditions of the subdivision ordinance; and the following conditions: 1. Preliminary Plat is redrawn to reflect appropriate right-of-way dedication per recommendations of the City Engineer. 2. Remove northerly Lot 2 access on Fallon Ave with development or use of the property 3. Site conditions are modified to remove former storage area and fencing from the south boundary of Lot 1. 4. Recommendations of the City Engineers Report, dated May 25th, 2018, are incorporated into the Preliminary Plat. 5. Execution of Development Agreement as may be required. 6. Recommendations of other staff and Planning Commission. BE IT FURTHER RESOL VED BY THE CITY CO UNCIL OF MONTICELL 0, MINNESOTA, that the document titled "Development Contract for Oakwood Industrial Park 3rd Addition," with assignment of the specific terms and conditions for public improvements and the specific terms and conditions for plat development, is hereby approved. ADOPTED BYthe Monticello City Council this 25th day of June. 2018. CITY OF MONTICELLO Brian Stumpf, Mayor ATTEST: Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2018-019 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A PRELIMINARY PLAT KNOWN AS "OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK 3RD ADDITION" WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing to replat platted land into a 2 -lot subdivision; and WHEREAS, the subject property is currently zoned I-2, Heavy Industrial; and WHEREAS, the subject property is guided for "Places to Work" in the official Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, all lots in the proposed plat conform to the minimum requirements of the 1-2 Zoning District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the matter at its regular meeting on June 5th, 2018, and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: 1. The proposed plat is consistent with the intent of the Monticello Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposed plat will be consistent with the present and future zoning and land uses in the area. 3. The proposed plat will meet the requirements of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance. 4. The proposed plat will not create undue burdens on public systems, including streets and utilities. 5. The proposed rezoning will not create substantial impacts, visual or otherwise, on neighboring land uses. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota that the proposed rezoning is hereby recommended for approval, subject to the following conditions: CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2018-019 1. Preliminary Plat is redrawn to reflect appropriate right-of-way dedication per recommendations of the City Engineer. 2. Site conditions are modified to remove former storage area and fencing from the south boundary of Lot 1. 3. Recommendations of the City Engineers Report, dated May 30th, 2018, are incorporated into the Preliminary Plat. 4. Execution of Development Agreement as may be required. 5. Recommendations of other staff and Planning Commission. ADOPTED this 5th day of June, 2018, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. MONTICELLO PLANNING R -A Development Director 4 Fyle, Platinum Technologies, LLC - Request for Preliminary and Final Plat Lot 6, Block 2, Oakwood Industrial Park I PID: 155-018-0020611 219 Dundas Road CHELSEA ix�l 111,4, PIN1550.75001 1.!1 �i i 1 155U18D02030 Y15501 002050 155018002020 1550118002040'`, 1.55131001010 1550606 " 002061 11551310010jaw.30 1550:18Aix 155018002080 1 ;�,�, 0 1'55060001050 r LJ 4i _1 iu ] 1'5509200201.0 1. - DUNDAS' j 155 , 8 0 1550.92 ' ..w�� sqµ.-•� 4ai...' i�}�Q r LL 15501 8003U71 55092001 01 0 5501480030 0 ' 155188001030' i 316 ft A SII Created by: City of Monticello L -%k1 PROJECT NARRATIVE April 9, 2018 RE: Preliminary and Final Plat Property: 219 Dundas Road, Monticello, MN Oakwood Industrial Park, Lot -006, Block -002 PID #155-018-002061 Owner: Platinum Technologies, LLC. 525 Progress Road Waite Park, MN 56387 Applicant: Platinum Technologies, LLC. 525 Progress Road Waite Park, MN 56387 The applicant is requesting a preliminary and final plat. The property is 5.3 acres. The applicant is proposing to divide the property into 2 lots. Lot 1, Block 2, Oakwood Industrial Park Third Addition will be 1.49 acres Lot 2, Block 2, Oakwood Industrial Park Third Addition will be 3.81 acres. The Property is zoned I-2: Heavy Industrial District The owner and applicant will completing the platting process and will be selling Lot 1, Block 1 which will be developed by another party. Any requirements regarding development and future construction will be addressed when the developer submits their development plans. Thank you for your assistance. Commercial Realty Solutions, LLC. Wayne Elam *MONO COMMERCIAL REALTY SOLUTIONS a vww.commrealtysolutions.com PROJECT NARRATIVE April 9, 2018 RE: Preliminary and Final Plat Property: 219 Dundas Road, Monticello, MN Oakwood Industrial Park, Lot -006, Block -002 PID #155-018-002061 Owner: Platinum Technologies, LLC. 525 Progress Road Waite Park, MN 56387 Applicant: Platinum Technologies, LLC. 525 Progress Road Waite Park, MN 56387 The applicant is requesting a preliminary and final plat. The property is 5.3 acres. The applicant is proposing to divide the property into 2 lots. Lot 1, Block 2, Oakwood Industrial Park Third Addition will be 1.49 acres Lot 2, Block 2, Oakwood Industrial Park Third Addition will be 3.81 acres. The Property is zoned I-2: Heavy Industrial District The owner and applicant will completing the platting process and will be selling Lot 1, Block 1 which will be developed by another party. Any requirements regarding development and future construction will be addressed when the developer submits their development plans. Thank you for your assistance. Commercial Realty Solutions, LLC. Wayne Elam CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY & PRELIMINARY PLAT OF NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK THIRD ADDITION 14, T. 121, R. 25 FOR PLATINUM TECHNOLOGIES.) LLC o^ o� Z REFERENCE MONUMENT ON EAST---- , , LINE OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 14, T. 121, R. 25 (FOUND WRIGHT COUNTY MONUMENT) Uj ZONING 1-2 - �/ N n -\7 WCG BUILDING PARTNERS LLC 218 CHELSEA RD \ I�I -CORNER PROPERTIES LLC MORWELLO MN 55562-8919 7 // 3383-MOHALNK DR _NW_ - / G I \ TAPJER'S HOLDINGS LLC I / (I - - - \ 1 `/ < - I ` BEMIDJI MN 56601-7954 -3035 WALDEN LN I I ,Y / 962 - \ \ I \ r / \ WA YZA TA MN 553917�1954 - _ I I \ IXISTING 10 FOOT WIDE I / \ �� `� `\ I 0� / I \- / UTILITY EASEMENT l - \ �\ �' l I I �/ \DEDICATED IN THE P�T OF \� \ - / J /I _954 - - - - KWOOD INDUSTRIA PARK - - _ _ J- \ I - 958 _ / ` z- _ , - - - - - - (EAST PLAT) -958957 g56- - J - -) 5 8,' 4, I I� / 9s, 56-- 955- -N 88°35' 14" E_ - - - - - - - _ _ `9 3 �!ol �\ / I AO1 ------ --'- j---954_-_ i �� -----= -952--- - - - 954.0 / LI- N _ =373.82;-=----------�- ,� - - - �- g52 �`,9,-'=-952-- 953 I----------- - X950.8--1 951.2X 1�-I .=950.9 -_ --� i _ -_--_-950.8X-= - 0=951-- X 950.4 _ _ _ _ _ INV_950.Z-� 115 R P / - - - - - - - - - - - - - X950.4 - x950-7 �w- � = R. =_--951---------L�- _------ --_� ---- N- -- � � � cV � 12 , -------------954- 1 - MT -6 1 _ �----�------�--�--------�------------�-------------- � EXISTING DRAINAGE \ I e / I X 956.1 EASEMENT DESCRIBED / i9s /5V X2 IN DOC. NO. 342775 12 1 X 952.3 X�'- `�- / / X 954.1 1 X 953.8 I I I ✓ - _ 7 \ / I / of \\ 1 L6 o/� Pro osed Lot // PROPOSE DRAINAGE-_, I I I LI \ 1149 Acres I -I 6, x 955.7 / ^ ; � / AND UTILITY EASEMENT (65 090 Sq. Ft.) I W \ / / X 953.8 I I III I J w I Y X 956.1 </ X 955.5 955. \ \ \ / / / \ i 953.0 - -I I I i INTEGRATED RECYCLING TECH CORP \ � I I / 5 - J ` - - IJ I '� � ® ! 219 DUNDAS RD \\ C� i I 1 ---FENCE TO BE MOVED SOUTH- 1 I �X� \ MONTICELLO MN 55362-8916 i l OF PROPOSED LOT LINE \ - T R EI p 953.8- 54- - - - I I I4 - - - -7 -o'-� X370.06- o o 956 - rt % 7. X \ �,-. P170POSED X.9553 16 - - - - - X 956.8 - LS :TL INE X 953.3 01 I \ I \ ,,--PROPOSED DRAINAiSE- ,, AND UTILITY EASEME T •� '�� ~ ` ' • '' -- J I I I -�� r --i X:955.1.:: co i : / I ° ® \ 14 Lf' I' - X 956.3 d- 5 I n I 10:, I � I x� \ ------------------------------207.62--------------- ---------------- I o ". \ 956.7 X :..... ...:': CL X 95 .. .. I _ .: BONING „1...2:.....:...: /.:.. a:. ( \ ZOI IING 1-2 957.2 x L I LO� I / LiJ 18" � . �� X I �- 05 0ON O rn rn cfl o moo. .. :...':...' I o : O o c / /\ / 956 CLING TECH CORP "' .:' •' �. I INTEGRATED RECY / .. .. - I °' 219 DUNDAS RD I \�( �12" I I �I �1 I I L_ LJ I I / \ I/ .... MONTICELLO MN 55362-8916LIT- I �C 953.9 I \ �T I i _ u� I 7 '\ :957:9; . cn co X 957.1 ) I rL C-11 40.0%/// / •. \�� J in / %////////? 955.3 I V Uz L_ / I X957.3 J /o \�OQ� ///,27.0 /%/ 37.07' �/ 956.5 \ I Ito 956.9 X oD 9s� �� FLOOR ELE ' j I �- w J I i Ir L =957.95 /,I h ------- --�-- �zW �1 / o-� 5 .2 CL m N I n/ �� xs I Proposed Lot 2 I 5\ O -- U�� z L� �_�/ r \ 3.81 Acres j Q� Ln o n (166,129 Sq. Ft.) / // 40.4'///�'TN- v � I I X 957.1 57.9 \9S8 x j -- \_, ❑ X54.51 1 1 I co z > , 'o j ///19.8 Qz�� o � n� I 12� % EXISTING BUILDING CLQ�� i _ _958.0% I I / �9 �' 1 I I\ rn I X 957.3 s8� % -- OOR ELEV. °' 12 I I I I I I \ ��I _j / FL=957.95 FLOOR ELEV. ' 12"I j =958.00 I I o �\ I x957.7 / ' I I I I I '1 I \ X 957.8 ' ll X 957.8 j 10 ` X 1954.5 I� N 1 / \ \ % 0.0 ,19.9 �1 I\ I I rn 8 957.9 // " 957.8 I / 95 X / I I V -I i LIJ FLOOR ELEV. I 10" I I I I I cv $)�� N =957.89 zl.- co _ N a = / \ j� 6 60.3 N h rn g" \��y\ / � \ \ I � � / � \ i c��:,.�;.•1a,�.� a x 57. I I 157. z II II I �� JIU 1 I------A / I 9ss I X 958.1 / X 857.9 W �\ I �I0 I C I KANT-SING PARTNERSHIP LLi I x 957.2 c�'F'� Q � i � W I / � � 6950 FRANCE AVE S STE 10 I X 958.1 cGT W J I EDINA MN 55435-2024 \ 95/.8x \ 9s8� - - - \ \ 7„ \ = 957.2 j 957.1 0 p -- EXISTING 10 FOOT WIDE - z I� 1 \ 1 UTILITY EASEMENT 3 I; DEDICATED IN THE PLAT OF # 956.4 X �9 i X I 1 OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK ' �_ -_ - S�� } - - -� _N - \ X957 --/-- I - - - - - ---- -�� - -75T - --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -i - - - _ '-i- - -956- - - 955.7 I � / - BENCHMARK: - - - _ 955.3 � (X 955.6 954.9 ____--' ,I � - - - �- . . _ . . - . . - . -�. - (:�\ x 956.1 - - - - - - _ '-- TOP NUT OF HYDRANT. _'%4.0 -- 954.5 _955- �l -360.30---- /., I s6 -956- - - I ELEV.=957.87 I - - -(360.00 PLAT) r _ ' -19 (FROM WSB RECORD DRAWING, 6'39" E - \ CITY PROJECT 96-01C) N 883 _-- I 0 (EAT PLAT I `�' I =1 - I 3 956.9 x QFC 2 d N _9ss_ ` DUNDAS ROAD - _ - - - \(0 o _ o EXISTING SANITARY SEWER AND /� z _ ----- WATER SERVICES AS SHOWN ------ --_ - - - - - - ON AS -BUILT PLAN I I i �_ -.g58 - . - . - - - - - - - - I - , I I - - - - - __---956----� ------------------ I' ZONING 1-1 -------- I -\7 \ I I , I ------ ------------958 ZONIII G 1-2 ,�� T \\ I // LI J► L� � _ r \ I rne - 960 - IJ L f J III I WURM PARTNERSHIP LLP I / I KMBI LLC I \ I I I 1 LI J 9462 50TH ST NW /> II KMBI LLC // I 1401 FALCON AVE I II I I I II \ ANNANDALE MN 55302-3102 // 1 1401 FALLON AVE / MONTICELLO MN 55362 \ �� MONTICELLO MN 5.5362 � D Y. b► I I • i 0 L19 STORM MANHOLE DENOTES IRON SOIL TYPE ACCORDING TO USDA NATURAL RESOURCE CONSERVATION • DENOTES o CONCRETE SURFACE SERVICE WEB SOIL SURVEY: Dorset Sandy Loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes. LEGEND DENOTES `' EAST QUARTER CORNER OF--\ GATE VALVE GRAVEL SURFACE SECTION 14, T. 121, R. 25 } , (FOUND WRIGHT COUNTY MONUMENT) D SANITARY SEWER 0-0-0- STEEL PANEL FENCE Insurance Company Commitment for Title Insurance issued by Preferred Title, Inc., Order No. 6869540, Effective Date February 27, 2018. STORM SEWER - -950- - INDEX CONTOUR ------ 0-0 o CHAIN LINK FENCE EXISTING PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 2. Bearing orientation of this survey is based on the Wright County WATERMAIN - - - - -951- Lot 6, Block 2, OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK, according to the recorded A/C UNIT EDGE OF WOODED AREA plat thereof, Wright County, Minnesota. of the plat Of record. SANITARY MANHOLE - - - - - - -952 - - - - - - EXISTING GROUND CONTOUR (2 FT. INTERVAL - FROM MN DNR LIDAR DATA) 3. Existing utilities are shown according observed evidence only. Utilities CATCH BASIN BITUMINOUS SURFACE EXISTING ZONING OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: 1-2 must be field verified prior to any excavation by calling Gopher State One STORM MANHOLE DENOTES IRON SOIL TYPE ACCORDING TO USDA NATURAL RESOURCE CONSERVATION • DENOTES o CONCRETE SURFACE SERVICE WEB SOIL SURVEY: Dorset Sandy Loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes. HYDRANT DENOTES CAST-IRON MONUMENT FOUND GATE VALVE GRAVEL SURFACE , SURVEYORS NOTES: 1. Matters of record are shown according to Commonwealth Land Title UTILITY RISER Insurance Company Commitment for Title Insurance issued by Preferred Title, Inc., Order No. 6869540, Effective Date February 27, 2018. SIGN - -950- - INDEX CONTOUR (FROM FIELD SURVEY DATA) 2. Bearing orientation of this survey is based on the Wright County TELEPHONE RISER - - - - -951- - - - _ INTERMEDIATE CONTOUR Coordinate System, NAD 83(86), which differs from the bearing orientation A/C UNIT (FROM FIELD SURVEY DATA) of the plat Of record. POWER BOX - - - - - - -952 - - - - - - EXISTING GROUND CONTOUR (2 FT. INTERVAL - FROM MN DNR LIDAR DATA) 3. Existing utilities are shown according observed evidence only. Utilities must be field verified prior to any excavation by calling Gopher State One ELECTRIC METER Call @ 651-454-0002. GAS METER 4. Field work for this survey was completed between 2/12/18 and 2/28/18. Due to ice and snow cover at the time of this survey, features may exist on site which are not shown hereon. N:\Land Projects\18128 - IRT\dwg\Preliminary Plat\18128 Preliminary Plat.dwg 0 40 80 120 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET o DENOTES IRON MONUMENT SET • DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND pQ DENOTES CAST-IRON MONUMENT FOUND I hereby certify that this survey, plan, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Date 04/06/18 „�„n,uiii lllnlllllnii� JJLL�z ,, LANO SERVICES 708 1 ST AVENUE NE, # 1 BUFFALO, MN 55313 PH.763.682.1781 WWW.MEYERROHLIN.COM DRAWN BY BOOK 393 SHEET AAN PAGE 1-2 1 Abram A. Niemela License No. 48664 REVISIONS DATE 04I06II8 I OF FILE NO. SHEETS 18128 OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK THIRD ADDITION NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE -' 1 NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 3 14, T. 121, R. 25 N I �N � N O O ' I z REFERENCE MONUMENT ON EAST----- • LINE OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 14, T. 121, R. 25 (WRIGHT COUNTY MONUMENT) ' wl I N n P Ln o^ of n (EAST PLAT) 0 n C U U o N 88°35' 14" E I�� 1 ----373.82--- `,9 .'� + \ \ o------ --- �--------� -- — r �\ -EXISTING DRAINAGE EXISTING 10 FOOT WIDE I EASEMENT DESCRIBED UTILITY EASEMENT DEDICATED IN DOC. NO. 342775 IN THE PLAT OF OAKWOOD DRAINAGE AND INDUSTRIAL PARK UTILITY EASEMENT L I I o o I 1 Imol LIJ 1.49 Acres I _ I 65,090 Sq. Ft. 12 Li - DRAINAGE '> DRAINAGE AND --c-+_ - l 12-- I�- UTILITY EASEMENT ` 370.06 U-- - - - - - - - -�-S-88'35'14" W l � I L I I -,---DRAINAGE AND-'' 0 .-' UTILITY EASEMENT O I I I I I I O a, ti E, 1 I I ae) co i� I�I�� I I \ Mom e 0 a00M� 1 I I :z; o I I I I CO 2 '� L, L r \ I 3.81 Acres 166,129 Sq. Ft. I I I I I I I I 12_ I I I 12-- I�- I I I I I I I I I I I I _EXISTING 10 FOOT WIDE 1 ---DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT UTILITY EASEMENT I i h 11--UTILITY DEDICATED IN THE PLAT OF r, OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK U ---- o ----360.27---- (360.00 PLAT) o N 88036'39" E (EAST PLAT) L,/ k_)1 \4 L_,/ ✓ L,Lr\ fi-A D SERA/ 00ES N:\Land Projects\18128 - IRT Plat\dwg\Plat\18128 Plat—Sheet l.dwg EAST QUARTER CORNER OF -- SECTION 14, T. 121, R. 25 (WRIGHT COUNTY MONUMENT) 1�� VICINITY MAP SECTION 14, T. 121, R. 25, WRIGHT COUNTY, MN 0 1000 2000 3000 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 1 INCH = 1000 FEET 9494 CHELSEA RD. I AI SITE DUNDAS RD. KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That owner of the following described property situated in the County of Wright, State of Minnesota, to wit: \ Lot 6, Block 2, OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK, Wright County, Minnesota. \\ Has caused the some to be surveyed and platted as OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK THIRD ADDITION and does hereby dedicate to the public for public use the drainage and utility easements as created by this plat. In witness whereof said has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this day of 20 Signed: , STATE OF MINNESOTA ---- ---' COUNTY OF This instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20 , by ____________- of ______ on behalf of the (Signature) (Name Printed) Notary Public, County, Minnesota My Commission Expires I, Abram A. Niemela, do hereby LU prepared by me or under my direct supervision; that Z Surveyor in the State of Minnesota; that this plat is a correct representation of the boundary LU mathematical data and labels are correctly designated on this plat; that all monuments depicted on this plat have been, or Q set within one year, that all water boundaries and wet Z as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.01, Subd. 3, as of the date of O and labeled on this plat; and all public ways are shown and labeled on this plat. I J Dated this day of 20 LL 60 120 180 Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.03, Subd. 2. Abram A. Niemela, Licensed Land Surveyor L Jr n — KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That owner of the following described property situated in the County of Wright, State of Minnesota, to wit: \ Lot 6, Block 2, OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK, Wright County, Minnesota. \\ Has caused the some to be surveyed and platted as OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK THIRD ADDITION and does hereby dedicate to the public for public use the drainage and utility easements as created by this plat. In witness whereof said has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this day of 20 Signed: , STATE OF MINNESOTA ---- ---' COUNTY OF This instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20 , by ____________- of ______ on behalf of the (Signature) (Name Printed) Notary Public, County, Minnesota My Commission Expires I, Abram A. Niemela, do hereby certify that this plat was prepared by me or under my direct supervision; that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor in the State of Minnesota; that this plat is a correct representation of the boundary survey; that all mathematical data and labels are correctly designated on this plat; that all monuments depicted on this plat have been, or will be correctly set within one year, that all water boundaries and wet lands, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.01, Subd. 3, as of the date of this certificate are shown and labeled on this plat; and all public ways are shown and labeled on this plat. I Dated this day of 20 r0 60 120 180 Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.03, Subd. 2. Abram A. Niemela, Licensed Land Surveyor L Jr Minnesota License No. 48664 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF WRIGHT The foregoing Surveyor's Certificate was acknowledged before me this day of 20 by Abram A. Niemela, Land Surveyor, Minnesota License No. 48664. (Signature) (Name Printed) / Notary Public, County, Minnesota My Commission Expires CITY OF MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION Be it known that at a meeting held on this day of 20 the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, did hereby review and approve this plat of OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK THIRD ADDITION . WRIGHT COUNTY RECORDER I hereby certify that this instrument was filed in the office of the County Recorder for record on this day of 20 at o'clock M., and was duly recorded in Cabinet No. Sleeve as Document No. Wright County Recorder DRAt"i'COPY 04ZO6,118 FOR CITY SUBMITTAL Chairperson Secretary CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA This plat of OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK THIRD ADDITION was approved and accepted by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, I at a regular meeting thereof held this day of 20 and said plat is in compliance with the provisions of r0 60 120 180 Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.03, Subd. 2. L Jr \> < > C j GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET Mayor Clerk r 1 INCH = 60 FEET J • DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND ' WRIGHT COUNTY SURVEYOR SO `) /�� J '7 0 DENOTES IRON MONUMENT SET, I hereby certify that in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.021, Subd. 11, this plat has been reviewed and approved this MARKED BY LICENSE NO. 48664 z > day of 20 < I-. �� OO DENOTES CAST—IRON MONUMENT FOUND �� ,r Wright County Surveyor c, QN WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITOR/TREASURER Ui Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.021, Subd. 9, taxes payable for the year 20 on the land hereinbefore described have o'- been paid. Also, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 272.12, there are no delinquent taxes and transfer entered this day of wo BEARING ORIENTATION: 20 zi w THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHEAST ' ;cr) 1/4 OF SECTION 14, T. 121, R. 25 IS w o ASSUMED TO BEAR N 00'07'52" W. By: Wright County Auditor/Treasurer - - - - - Deputy WRIGHT COUNTY RECORDER I hereby certify that this instrument was filed in the office of the County Recorder for record on this day of 20 at o'clock M., and was duly recorded in Cabinet No. Sleeve as Document No. Wright County Recorder DRAt"i'COPY 04ZO6,118 FOR CITY SUBMITTAL WSB Building a legacy — your legacy. May 25, 2018 Ms. Angela Schumann Community Development Director City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1 Monticello, MN 55362 Re: Oakwood Industrial Park 3rd Addition Plat Review City Project No. 2018-021 WS13 Project No. 012152-000 Dear Ms. Schumann: 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763-541-4800 Fax: 763-541-1700 We have reviewed the certificate of survey, preliminary and final plat dated April 6, 2018 as prepared by Meyer-Rohlin Land Services, and offer the following comments: 1. The plat should dedicate a 40 -foot wide right of way along Fallon Avenue from centerline. This is anticipated to be adequate for future widening and potential pathway facilities along the roadway. 2. Remove northerly Lot 2 access on Fallon Ave with development or use of the property. Fallon Ave is a collector road and a minimum 200 foot spacing is recommended. The other existing access points line up with the accesses on the east side of the road, which is preferred. 3. There are no existing sewer and water services to the proposed Lot 1. A new sewer service will need to extend from the main in the street. A new water service will need to extend from the watermain located in the ditch along the east side of Fallon Ave. 4. The City's capital improvement plan calls for future widening of Fallon Avenue with curb and gutter and storm sewer, anticipated in the next 5 years. Trunk sanitary sewer improvements will also be included with the project and is currently being studied. 5. It should be noted that future assessments are proposed for street and utility improvements along Fallon Ave in accordance with the City's assessment policy. 6. The properties currently have a MPCA industrial storm water permit and will need to be amended with platting or development. Please give me a call at 763-271-3236 if you have any questions or comments regarding this letter. Equal Opportunity Employer wsbeng.com K:\02596-420\Admin\Docs\050817 submittal May 31, 2018 Page 2 Thank you. Sincerely, WSB & Associates, Inc. /A,(.. i' 46�ssOql Shibani K. Bisson, PE City Engineer 5117 K:\012152-000\Admin\Docs\Ltr Aschumann- Oakwood 3rd Add Plat 052518.docx (reserved for recording information) DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT (Developer Installed Improvements) OAKWOOD IND USTRIAL PARK 3RD ADDITION AGREEMENT dated , 2018, by and between the CITY OF MONTICELLO, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City"), and PLATINUM TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (the "Developer and Owner"). REQUEST FOR PLAT APPROVAL. The Developer and Owner has asked the City to approve a plat for OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK 3" ADDITION (referred to in this Contract as the "plat" and the "Development"). The Development consists of 5.3 acres and the property will be divided into two (2) industrial lots. The land is situated in the County of Wright, State of Minnesota, and is legally described on the attached Exhibit "A". 2. CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL. The City hereby approves the plat on condition that the Developer and Owner enter into this Contract, furnish the security required by it, and record the plat with the County Recorder / Registrar of Titles within 365 days after the City Council approves the final plat or the execution of this Contract, whichever occurs later. i9so6ovi 3. RIGHT TO PROCEED. Within the plat or land to be platted, the Developer and Owner may not grade or otherwise disturb the earth, remove trees, construct sewer lines, water lines, streets, utilities, public or private improvements, or any buildings until all the following conditions have been satisfied: 1) this agreement has been fully executed by both parties and filed with the City Clerk, 2) the necessary security has been received by the City, 3) the plat has been submitted to the Wright County Recorder's Office, and 4) the City has issued a letter that all conditions have been satisfied and that the Developer and Owner may proceed. 4. PHASED DEVELOPMENT. Subsequent development, reuse or redevelopment of any of the lots within the plat will be subject to individual land use approvals, Conditional Use Permits or Planned Unit Development approvals, and amendment to Development Agreement(s), as may be required. Subsequent development, reuse or redevelopment of any of the lots within the plat is subject to the requirements of the Monticello Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances, including the submission of site and building plans, final grading and drainage plans, final utility plans, and final landscaping plans. 5. PRELIMINARY PLAT STATUS. This plat is not part of a phased preliminary plat. 6. CHANGES IN OFFICIAL CONTROLS. For two (2) years from the date of this Contract, no amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan, or official controls shall apply to or affect the use, development density, lot size, lot layout or dedications of the approved plat unless required by state or federal law or agreed to in writing by the City and the Developer and Owner. Thereafter, notwithstanding anything in this Contract to the contrary, to the full extent permitted by state law, the City may require compliance with any amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan and official controls. 7. ZONING. Except as otherwise provided herein, the subject property shall be subject to the zoning regulations and the requirements and standards of the I-2 Heavy Industrial Zoning District, in effect at the time the final plat is approved. 2 19so6ovi 8. DEVELOPMENT PLANS. The plat shall be developed in accordance with the following plans. The plans shall not be attached to this Contract. With the exception of Plan A, the plans may be prepared, subject to City approval, after entering the Contract, but before commencement of any work in the plat. The erosion control plan may also be approved by the Wright County Soil and Water Conservation District. If the plans vary from the written terms of this Contract, the written terms shall control. The plans are: Plan A — Preliminary and Final Plat Plan B - Final Grading, Development, and Erosion Control Plan Plan C - Plans and Specifications for Public Improvements Plan D - Street Lighting Plan Plan E - Landscape Plan: General site and individual unit landscaping plans Plan F — Building Plans, facade elevations and typical architectural design plans 9. IMPROVEMENTS. The Developer and Owner shall install and pay for the following: A. Sanitary Sewer System B. Water System C. Storm Sewer System D. Site Grading, Ponding, and Erosion Control E. Underground Utilities F. Setting of Iron Monuments G. Surveying and Staking The improvements shall be installed in accordance with the City subdivision ordinance; City standard specifications for utilities and street construction; and any other ordinances. The Developer and Owner shall submit plans and specifications which have been prepared by a registered professional engineer to the 3 19so6ovi City for approval by the City Engineer. The City may, at the City's discretion and at the Developer and Owner's expense, have one or more City inspectors and a soil engineer inspect the work on a full or part-time basis. The Developer and Owner, its contractors and subcontractors, shall follow all written instructions received from the City's inspectors subject to Developer and Owner's plans and specifications. The Developer and Owner or his engineer shall schedule a pre -construction meeting at a mutually agreeable time at the City Council chambers with all parties concerned, including the City staff, to review the program for the construction work. Within thirty (30) days after the completion of the improvements and before the security is released, the Developer and Owner shall supply the City with a complete set of reproducible "as constructed" plans, an electronic file of the "as constructed" plans in an auto CAD.DWG file or a .DXF file, and two complete sets of blue line "as constructed" plans, all prepared in accordance with City standards. In accordance with Minnesota Statutes § 505.021, the final placement of iron monuments for all lot corners must be completed before the applicable security is released. The Developer and Owner's surveyor shall also submit a written notice to the City certifying that the monuments have been installed. 10. PERMITS. The Developer and Owner shall obtain or require its contractors and subcontractors to obtain all necessary permits, including but not limited to: • Wright County for County Road Access and Work in County Rights -of -Way • Wright County Soil Conservation District • MnDot for State Highway Access • Minnesota Department of Health for Watermains • NPDES Permit for Stormwater Connections • MPCA for Sanitary Sewer and Hazardous Material Removal and Disposal • DNR for Dewatering • City of Monticello for Building Permits 11. DEWATERING. Due to the variable nature of groundwater levels and stormwater flows, it will be the Developer and Owner's and the Developer and Owner's contractors and subcontractors responsibility to satisfy themselves with regard to the elevation of groundwater in the area and the level of effort needed to perform dewatering and storm flow routing operations. All dewatering shall be in 4 19so6ovi accordance with all applicable county, state, and federal rules and regulations. DNR regulations regarding appropriations permits shall also be strictly followed. 12. LICENSE. The Developer and Owner hereby grants the City, its agents, employees, officers and contractors a license to enter the platted property to perform all work and inspections deemed appropriate by the City in conjunction with plat development. 13. EROSION CONTROL AND STORM WATER CONTROL. Prior to initiating site grading, the erosion control plan, Plan B, shall be implemented by the Developer and Owner and inspected and approved by the City or Wright County Soil and Water Conservation District. The City or Wright County Soil and Water Conservation District may impose additional erosion control and storm water requirements if they would be beneficial. All areas disturbed by the excavation and backfilling operations shall be reseeded within 48 hours after the completion of the work or in an area that is inactive for more than seven (7) days unless authorized and approved by the City Engineer. Except as otherwise provided in the erosion control plan, seed shall be in accordance with the City's current seeding specification which may include certified oat seed to provide a temporary ground cover as rapidly as possible. All seeded areas shall be fertilized, mulched, and disc anchored as necessary for seed retention. The parties recognize that time is of the essence in controlling erosion. If the Developer and Owner does not comply with the erosion control plan and schedule or supplementary instructions received from the City or the Wright County Soil and Water Conservation District, the City may take such action as it deems appropriate to control erosion. The City will endeavor to notify the Developer and Owner in advance of any proposed action, but failure of the City to do so will not affect the Developer and Owner's and City's rights or obligations hereunder. If the Developer and Owner does not reimburse the City for any cost the City incurred for such work within ten (10) days, the City may draw down the letter of credit to pay any costs. No development, utility or street 1980600 construction will be allowed and no building permits will be issued unless the plat is in full compliance with the approved erosion control plan and storm water control measures are in place. 14. GRADING PLAN AND CERTIFICATION. The plat shall be graded in accordance with the approved grading plan, stormwater control measures and erosion control plan as set forth in Plan "B". The plan shall conform to City of Monticello specifications. Within thirty (30) days after completion of the grading and before the City approves individual building permits (except as permitted by this agreement or the Building Official), the Developer and Owner shall provide the City with an "as constructed" grading plan certified by a registered land surveyor or engineer that all ponds, swales, and ditches have been constructed on public easements or land owned by the City. Additionally, the "as constructed" grading plan will include a certification that the grading following construction activities has been undisturbed or has been returned to the state required in the grading plan. The "as constructed" plan shall include field verified elevations of the following: a) cross sections of ponds; b) location and elevations along all swales, wetlands, wetland mitigation areas if any, ditches, locations and dimensions of borrow areas/stockpiles, and installed "conservation area" posts; and c) lot corner elevations, and building pads. The City will withhold issuance of building permits until the approved certified grading plan is on file with the City and all erosion control measures are in place as determined by the City Engineer. The Developer and Owner certifies to the City that all lots with building footings placed on fill have been monitored and constructed to meet or exceed applicable specifications. 15. CLEAN UP. The Developer and Owner shall clean dirt and debris from streets that has resulted from construction work by the Developer and Owner, subcontractors, their agents or assigns. Prior to any construction in the plat, the Developer and Owner shall identify in writing a responsible party and schedule for erosion control, street cleaning, and street sweeping. The Developer and Owner shall pay a penalty of $100.00 a day for each calendar day that the streets are not cleaned in accordance with this 6 19so6ovi paragraph. If the Developer and Owner repeatedly fails to clean streets in accordance with this paragraph, the City may, in its discretion, perform the work or contract to have the work completed and bill the costs to the Developer and Owner. The City will endeavor to notify the Developer and Owner in advance of any proposed action, but failure of the City to do so will not affect the Developer and Owner's and City's rights or obligations hereunder. If the Developer and Owner does not reimburse the City for any cost the City incurred for such work within ten (10) days from the date notice of the amount owed to the City is mailed, the City may draw down the Irrevocable Letter of Credit to pay any costs. No development, utility or street construction will be allowed and no building permits will be issued unless the Plat is in full compliance with the requirements of this Paragraph. 16. OWNERSHIP OF IMPROVEMENTS. Upon completion of the work and construction required by this Contract, the improvements lying within public easements shall become City property without further notice or action. 17. CITY ENGINEERING ADMINISTRATION AND CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION. The Developer and Owner shall pay a fee for the City's engineering administration at the time of development, reuse or redevelopment of any lot within the plat, as required. City engineering administration will include monitoring of construction observation, consultation with Developer and Owner and his engineer on status or problems regarding the project, coordination for final inspection and acceptance, project monitoring during the warranty period, and processing of requests for reduction in security. Fees for this service will be billed at hourly rates estimated to be two percent (2.0%) of the estimated construction cost, assuming normal construction and project scheduling. The Developer and Owner shall pay for construction observation performed by the City's consulting engineer. Construction observation shall include part or full time inspection of proposed public utilities and street construction and will be billed on hourly rates. 7 19so6ovi 18. CLAIMS. In the event that the City receives claims from labor, materialmen, or others that work required by this Contract has been performed, the sums due them have not been paid, and the laborers, materialmen, or others are seeking payment from the City, the Developer and Owner hereby authorizes the City to commence an Interpleader action pursuant to Rule 22, Minnesota Rules of Civil Procedure for the District Courts, to draw upon the letters of credit in an amount up to 125 percent of the claim(s) and deposit the funds in compliance with the Rule, and upon such deposit, the Developer and Owner shall release, discharge, and dismiss the City from any further proceedings as it pertains to the letters of credit deposited with the District Court, except that the Court shall retain jurisdiction to determine attorneys' fees pursuant to this Contract. 19. RESPONSIBILITY FOR TRUNK AREA CHARGES. Trunk area charges are applicable Lot 1, Block 1 within the plat and shall be paid at the time of Development of Lot 1, Block 1. Trunk area charges for watermain, storm sewer and sanitary sewer shall be enumerated in the individual Development Agreement for each lot and shall be payable at the prevailing rate and paid at the time of building permit for each individual lot, and shall be the responsibility of the Developer and Owner pursuant to the Development Agreement, or each individual lot Developer and Owner as the case may be. 20. PARK DEDICATION AND TRAILS. Not applicable. 21. SUMMARY OF SECURITY REQUIREMENTS. To guarantee compliance with the terms of this agreement or future amendments to this agreement, the Developer and Owner, or each individual lot Developer and Owner as the case may be, shall furnish the City with a letter of credit, in the form attached hereto, from a bank ("security") for landscaping, site grading and any required public improvements at the time of the development, re -use or redevelopment of the lots within the plat. The amount of the security will be based on the landscaping, site grading and any required public improvements. 1980600 22. SUMMARY OF CASH REQUIREMENTS. Cash securities per item 17 of this contract requirements must be furnished to the City prior to the time of development, re -use or redevelopment of any of the lots within the plat: 23. SPECIAL PROVISIONS. The following special provisions shall apply to plat development: A. Implementation of the recommendations listed in the May 25th, 2018 City Engineer's Report. B. The Developer and Owner shall redraw the preliminary plat to reflect the appropriate right-of-way dedication per the City Engineer's recommendation and must obtain City Engineer's approval. C. The Developer and Owner shall dedicate a 40 foot right-of-way along Fallon Avenue from the centerline to the City. D. The Developer and Owner shall remove the northerly Lot 2 access to Fallen Avenue with the development or use of the property. E. The Developer and Owner shall modify the site conditions to remove the existing building, parking areas and other gravel surfaces to be located entirely on Lot 2, together with relocating the fence from the south boundary of Lot 1, prior to plat approval. F. The Developer and Owner shall install and connect a new sewer service from the main in the street to Lot 1. The Developer and Owner shall also install a new water service that will extend from the watermain located in the ditch along the east side of Fallon Avenue to Lot 1. G. The Developer and Owner shall obtain an amended MPCA industrial storm water permit prior to platting or development. 9 198o6ovl H. In accordance with the City's assessment policy, the Developer and Owner is aware that future assessments are proposed for street and utility improvements along Fallon Avenue. I. The City's capital improvement plan anticipates the future widening of Fallon Avenue with curb, gutter and storm sewer within the next five years. Trunk sanitary sewer improvements will also be included with this Development and are currently being studied. Prior to City Council approval of the final plat, the Developer and Owner shall furnish a boundary survey of the proposed property to be platted with all property corner monumentation in place and marked with lath and a flag. Any encroachments on or adjacent to the property shall be noted on the survey. The Developer and Owner shall post a $600.00 security for the final placement of interior subdivision iron monuments at property corners. The security was calculated as follows: 2 units at $300.00 per unit. The security will be held by the City until the Developer and Owner's land surveyor certifies that all irons have been set following site grading and utility and street construction. In addition, the certificate of survey must also include a certification that all irons for a specific lot have either been found or set prior to the issuance of a building permit for that lot. K. The Developer and Owner is required to submit the final plat in electronic format. The electronic format shall be either AutoCAD.DWG file or a .DXF file. All construction record drawings (e.g., grading, utilities, and streets) shall be in electronic format in accordance with standard City specifications. The Developer and Owner shall also submit one complete set of reproducible construction plans on Mylar. 24. RESPONSIBILITY FOR COSTS. A. Except as otherwise specified herein, the Developer and Owner shall pay all actual costs incurred by it or the City in conjunction with the development of the plat, including but not limited to Soil and Water Conservation District charges, legal, planning, engineering and inspection expenses incurred 10 19so6ovi in connection with approval and acceptance of the plat, the preparation of this Contract, review of construction plans and documents, and all costs and expenses incurred by the City in monitoring and inspecting development of the plat. The Developer and Owner shall deposit with the City the amount set forth in Section 28 to be used for the payment of these fees and enforcement fees. If the amount in the deposit account drops below 15% of the initial amount, the Developer and Owner will make additional deposits in amounts set by the City. At the completion of the project and following payment of all expenses related to the project, the City shall return the remaining deposit funds to the Developer and Owner. B. The Developer and Owner shall hold the City and its officers, employees, and agents harmless from claims made by it and third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred resulting from plat approval and development. The Developer and Owner shall indemnify the City and its officers, employees, and agents for all costs, damages, or expenses which the City may pay or incur in consequence of such claims, including reasonable attorneys' fees and costs. C. The Developer and Owner shall reimburse the City for costs incurred in the enforcement of this Contract, including engineering and attorneys' fees. D. The Developer and Owner shall pay in full all bills submitted to it by the City for obligations incurred under this Contract within thirty (30) days after receipt. If the bills are not paid on time, the City may halt plat development and construction until the bills are paid in full. Bills not paid within thirty (3 0) days shall accrue interest at the rate of eighteen percent (18%) per year. E. In addition to the charges and special assessments referred to herein, other charges and special assessments may be imposed such as but not limited to sewer availability charges ("SAC"), City water connection charges, City sewer connection charges, and building permit fees. 25. DEVELOPER AND OWNER'S DEFAULT. In the event of default by the Developer and Owner as to any of the work to be performed by it hereunder, the City may, at its option, perform the 11 19so6ovi work and the Developer and Owner shall promptly reimburse the City for any expense incurred by the City, provided the Developer and Owner, except in an emergency as determined by the City, is first given notice of the work in default, not less than forty-eight (48) hours in advance. This Contract is a license for the City to act, and it shall not be necessary for the City to seek a Court order for permission to enter the land. When the City does any such work, the City may, in addition to its other remedies, assess the cost in whole or in part. 26. MISCELLANEOUS. A. The Developer and Owner represents to the City that the plat complies with all city, county, metropolitan, state, and federal laws and regulations, including but not limited to: subdivision ordinances, zoning ordinances, and environmental regulations. If the plat ceases to comply with county, metropolitan, state and federal laws and regulations, the City may, at its option, refuse to allow construction or development work in the plat until the Developer and Owner does comply. Upon the City's demand, the Developer and Owner shall cease work until there is compliance. B. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City under this Contract. C. Breach of the terms of this Contract by the Developer and Owner shall be grounds for denial of building permits, including lots sold to third parties. D. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase of this Contract is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Contract. E. If building permits are issued prior to the acceptance of public improvements, the Developer and Owner assumes all liability and costs resulting in delays in completion of public improvements and damage to public improvements caused by the City, Developer and Owner, its contractors, subcontractors, material men, employees, agents, or third parties. No sewer and water 12 19so6ovi connection permits may be issued and no one may occupy a building for which a building permit is issued on either a temporary or permanent basis until the streets needed for access have been paved with a bituminous surface and the utilities are accepted by the City Engineer. F. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this Contract. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Contract shall not be a waiver or release. G. This Contract shall run with the land and may be recorded against the title to the property. The Developer and Owner covenants with the City, its successors and assigns, that the Developer and Owner is well seized in fee title of the property being final platted and/or has obtained consents to this Contract, in the form attached hereto, from all parties who have an interest in the property; that there are no unrecorded interests in the property being final platted; and that the Developer and Owner will indemnify and hold the City harmless for any breach of the foregoing covenants. In the event this contract is filed of record, upon compliance of all terms herein by Developer and Owner, the City shall file a termination of record. H. Developer and Owner or its prime contractor shall take out and maintain or cause to be taken out and maintained until one (1) month after the City has accepted the public improvements, public liability and property damage insurance covering personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage which may arise out of Developer and Owner's work or the work of its subcontractors or by one directly or indirectly employed by any of them. Limits for bodily injury and death shall be not less than $500,000 for one person and $1,000,000 for each occurrence; limits for property damage shall be not less than $200,000 for each occurrence; or a combination single limit policy of $1,000,000 or more. The City shall be named as an additional insured on the policy, and the Developer and Owner shall file with the City 13 19so6ovi a certificate evidencing coverage prior to the City signing the plat or when any construction commences, whichever later occurs. The certificate shall provide that the City must be given ten (10) days advance written notice of the cancellation of the insurance. I. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in addition to every other right, power or remedy, express or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to City, at law or in equity, or under any other agreement, and each and every right, power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy. J. The Developer and Owner may not assign this Contract without the written permission of the City Council, unless such assignment is to a principal of Developer and Owner or another entity in which the Developer and Owner is a principal. The Developer and Owner's obligation hereunder shall continue in full force and effect even if the Developer and Owner sells part or parts of the platted land, until all conditions of assignment are met. K. Retaining walls that require a building permit shall be constructed in accordance with plans and specifications prepared by a structural or geotechnical engineer licensed by the State of Minnesota. Following construction, a certification signed by the design engineer shall be filed with the City Engineer evidencing that the retaining wall was constructed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. All retaining walls, the development plans, or special conditions referred to in this Contract required to be constructed shall be constructed before any other building permit is issued for a lot on which a retaining wall is required to be built. 27. NOTICES. Required notices to the Developer and Owner shall be in writing, and shall be either hand delivered to the Developer and Owner, its employees or agents, or mailed to the Developer and 14 19so6ovi Owner by certified mail at the following address: 525 Progress Road, Waite Park, Minnesota 56387. Notices to the City shall be in writing and shall be either hand delivered to the City Administrator, or mailed to the City by certified mail in care of the City Administrator at the following address: Monticello City Hall, 505 Walnut Street, Monticello, Minnesota 55362; with a copy to the City Attorney by regular mail at: Campbell Knutson, P.A., Grand Oak Office Center I, 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite #290, Eagan, Minnesota 55121. Remainder of page intentionally left blank. Signatures on the following pages. 15 19so6ovi CITY OF MONTICELLO Lo (SEAL) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF WRIGHT ) Brian Stumpf, Mayor Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2018, by Brian Stumpf and by Jeff O'Neill, respectively the Mayor and City Administrator of the City of Monticello, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. Notary Public DRAFTED BY: Campbell Knutson Professional Association Grand oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, #290 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (651) 452-5000 JJJ 16 198060vi DEVELOPER AND OWNER: PLATINUM TECHNOLOGIES, LLC LOW STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF ) Stephen J. Budd, its Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2018, by Stephen J. Budd, the Manager of Platinum Technologies, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the entity. Notary Public DRAFTED BY: Campbell Knutson Professional Association Grand oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, #290 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (651) 452-5000 JJJ 17 198o6ovi EXHIBIT "A" Legal description of the Property Lot 6, Block 2, Oakwood Industrial Park, according to the recorded plat thereof, Wright County, Minnesota. 18 19so6ovi EXHIBIT `B" Citv standard specifications for utilities and street construction / Procedures for final acceptance of utilities 19 19so6ovi MORTGAGE HOLDER CONSENT TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT , a , which holds a mortgage on the subject property, the development of which is governed by the foregoing Development Contract, which mortgage is dated and recorded with the Wright County Recorder/Registrar as document number , agrees that the Development Contract shall remain in full force and effect even if it forecloses on its mortgage. Dated this day of , 2018. itz STATE OF [print name] Its [title] ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2018, by the of a , on behalf of the Notary Public DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL, KNUTSON Professional Association Grand Oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (651) 452-5000 JJJ 20 i98060vi IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT No. Date: TO: City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street Monticello, Minnesota 55362 Dear Sir or Madam: We hereby issue, for the account of (Name of Developer and Owner) and in your favor, our Irrevocable Letter of Credit in the amount of $ , available to you by your draft drawn on sight on the undersigned bank. The draft must: a) Bear the clause, "Drawn under Letter of Credit No. , dated , 2 , of (Name of Bank) "; b) Be signed by the Mayor or City Administrator of the City of Monticello. c) Be presented for payment at (Address of Bank) . on or before 4:00 p.m. on November 30, 2007. This Letter of Credit shall automatically renew for successive one-year terms unless, at least forty-five (45) days prior to the next annual renewal date (which shall be November 30 of each year), the Bank delivers written notice to the Monticello City Administrator that it intends to modify the terms of, or cancel, this Letter of Credit. Written notice is effective if sent by certified mail, postage prepaid, and deposited in the U.S. Mail, at least forty-five (45) days prior to the next annual renewal date addressed as follows: Monticello City Administrator, Monticello City Hall, 505 Walnut Street, Monticello, MN 55362, and is actually received by the City Administrator at least thirty (30) days prior to the renewal date. This Letter of Credit sets forth in full our understanding which shall not in any way be modified, amended, amplified, or limited by reference to any document, instrument, or agreement, whether or not referred to herein. This Letter of Credit is not assignable. This is not a Notation Letter of Credit. More than one draw may be made under this Letter of Credit. This Letter of Credit shall be governed by the most recent revision of the Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits, International Chamber of Commerce Publication No. 600. We hereby agree that a draft drawn under and in compliance with this Letter of Credit shall be duly honored upon presentation. Its 21 19so6ovi CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE PROJECT: CERTIFICATE HOLDER: City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street Monticello, Minnesota 55362 INSURED: ADDITIONAL INSURED: City of Monticello AGENT: WORKERS' COMPENSATION: Policy No. Effective Date: Expiration Date: Insurance Company: COVERAGE - Workers' Compensation, Statutory. GENERAL LIABILITY: Policy No. Effective Date: Expiration Date: Insurance Company: () Claims Made () Occurrence LIMITS: [Minimum] Bodily Injury and Death: $500,000 for one person $1,000,000 for each occurrence Property Damage: $200,000 for each occurrence -OR- Combination Single Limit Policy $1,000,000 or more COVERAGE PROVIDED: Operations of Contractor: YES Operations of Sub -Contractor (Contingent): YES Does Personal Injury Include Claims Related to Employment? YES 22 19so6ovi Completed Operations/Products: YES Contractual Liability (Broad Form): YES Governmental Immunity is Waived: YES Property Damage Liability Includes: Damage Due to Blasting YES Damage Due to Collapse YES Damage Due to Underground Facilities YES Broad Form Property Damage YES AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY: Policy No. Effective Date: Expiration Date: Insurance Company: (X) Any Auto LIMITS: [Minimum] Bodily Injury: $500,000 each person Property Damage: $500,000 each occurrence e Combined Single Limit Policy: $1,000,000 each occurrence $1,000,000 each occurrence ARE ANY DEDUCTIBLES APPLICABLE TO BODILY INJURY OR PROPERTY DAMAGE ON ANY OF THE ABOVE COVERAGES: If so, list: Amount: $ [Not to exceed $1,000.00] SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL MAIL TEN (10) DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE PARTIES TO WHOM THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED. Dated at On BY: Authorized Insurance Representative 23 1980601 OAKWOOD 3rd ADDITION SUMMARY OF EXPENSES/FINANCE PLAN Plat 6/18/2018 Total Acres in Development Total Acres in Phase Total Units in Development 5.3 gross 5.3 net 5.3 gross 5.3 net 2 Trunk Area Charges & Park Dedication Acreage Acres or Credits Charge Units Park & Pathway Dedication Special Assessments Road Reconstruction Lift Station Booster Station Sanitary Sewer (gross acres) $3,316 Watermain (gross acres) $2,452 Storm Sewer (net acres, base fee) $3,543 Storm Sewer (net acres, alternate ponding fee,, $7,277 Total amount to Assess/Pav at Time of Development Per Lot Pymt/Assessment based on (#) units Assessment NA NA NA NA NA Lot 1, Block 1, payable at prevailing rate at time of development NA Lot 1, Block 1, payable at prevailing rate at time of development NA Lot 1, Block 1, payable at prevailing rate at time of development NA Lot 1, Block 1, payable at prevailing rate at time of development City Fees/Deposit Utiity connection at Fallon; street, boulevard repair City Fee ( General overhead and Admin) 2.00% Actual; cost reconciled at project completion, minimum $2,000 Legal 2.00% Actual; cost reconciled at project completion, minimum $2,000 Planning 2.00% NA Actual; cost reconciled at project completion, minimum $2,000 Engineering and Inspection 7.00% Inspector /Engineer cost reconciled at project completion Grading and Restoration TBD Security required at time of lot development, redevelopment Streets and Utilities TBD Security required at time of lot development, redevelopment GPS Locate $60 2 Actual; cost reconciled at project completion Total City Fees Improvement Construction Costs (Used to Calculate City Fees/Escrows/Securities) Sanitary Sewer Watermain Storm Sewer Roads, Driveways and Sidewalks/Trails Lighting, Street Signage, Mailboxes Construction total (for Duroose of calculatina other Lot Corners/Iron Monuments $300 Total Construction Cost for the purpose of calculating LOC Letter of Credit Amount (Total cost X 125%) Maximum allowable reduction prior to acceptance and bond ADDITIONAL REQUIRED LETTERS OF CREDIT 90.00%1 NA Landscaping Prairie Restoration NA Tree Preservation NA Grading $3,000 AC Total Additional LOC $600 Notes Security required at the time of individual lot development, redevelopm Payable at the time of individual lot development, redevelopment City Council Agenda: 06/25/2018 2Q. Consideration of approving a request on an extension of final plat approval for Spaeth Industrial Park. (AS) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND The City has received a request for a one-year extension for the recording of the plat of the Spaeth Industrial Park. The Monticello Subdivision Ordinance requires that final plats be recorded within 100 days of plat approval. The property owner and developer, Mr. Ken Spaeth, had previously requested a 9 -month extension for the plat. Spaeth Industrial Park received final plat approval on July 24th, 2017. The 100 -day deadline for recording was therefore November 1St, 2017. The prior extension would have required recording of the plat on July 9th, 2018. With an approval of the requested one-year extension, the developer will have until July 9th, 2019, to record the plat. This timeline would allow for Mr. Spaeth to record the plat in summer 2019 and then begin site development. The extension will allow the applicant continued time to market the industrial lots. Mr. Spaeth has indicated that initial development of a certain number of lots is required to support installation of the infrastructure throughout the site. In addition, Mr. Spaeth has advised staff that they may also continue to market the parcel as a single 5 -acre industrial site. In addition, the Spaeth Industrial Park was approved as an industrial PUD. Under the ordinance in place at the time of the final stage PUD approval, there was no expiration of the PUD approval. To clarify approvals for the PUD for future review, Council approval of the plat extension would include an extension of final PUD approval to the July 9th, 2019 date, as well. Trunk area charges and other development -related fees will be required to be paid at prevailing rate at the time the plat is recorded. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS 1. Motion to approve a one-year extension for required recording of the approved final plat of Spaeth Industrial Park, including final stage PUD approval, with the final plat to be recorded on or before July 9th, 2019 and all development fees to be paid at prevailing rate at the time of recording. 2. Motion to deny the requested one-year final plat approval for Spaeth Industrial Park, based on findings to be made by the City Council. 3. Motion of other. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends Alternative #1 above. Staff has no objection to the requested extension. The Subdivision Ordinance does not prescribe a specific term of extension and the requested timeline aligns with a spring construction start. The ability to market City Council Agenda: 06/25/2018 the site for both small lot industrial and a 5 -acre parcel is a positive during this interim period. D. SUPPORTING DATA A. Letter of Request B. Subdivision Ordinance, Excerpt C. Plat Ken Spaeth 108 Meadowlark Rd. Se. St. Michael, Mn. 56557 612-889-3100 6-11-18 City of Monticello Angela Schumann Angela I'm requesting another extension for submitting the fees and surety for recording the final platt. I don't know how much time to ask for but those advising me said to ask for a year. Hopefully this works. Thanks, Ken necessary, the final plat shall be filed with the City Clerk and submitted to the Planning Commission at least twenty (20) days prior to a Commission meeting at which consideration is requested. During the said twenty (20) days, the City staff shall examine the final plat and prepare a recommendation to the Planning Commission. Approval, disapproval, or any delay in decision of the final plat will be conveyed to the subdivider within ten (10) days after the meeting of the City Planning Commission at which such plat was considered. In case the plat is disapproved, the subdivider shall be notified in writing of the reason for such action and what requirements shall be necessary to meet the approval of the Commission. If the plat is disapproved, a waiting period of one hundred eighty (180) days shall lapse before another application can be filed on that tract of land. In cases where the preliminary plat is approved, the final plat must be filed within one (1) year of the preliminary plat approval or the approval is not valid. (#426, 7/11/05) (B) APPROVAL OF THE CITY COUNCIL: After review of the final plat by the Planning Commission, if necessary, such final plat, together with the recommendations of the Planning Commission, shall be submitted to the City Council for approval. The City Council has the option of requesting a public hearing if it is determined necessary on the final plat. If accepted, the final plat shall be approved by resolution, which resolution shall provide for the acceptance of all agreements for basic improvements, public dedication, and other requirements as indicated by the City Council. If disapproved, the grounds for any refusal to approve a plat shall be set forth in the proceedings of the Council and reported to the person or persons applying for such approval. (#8, 2/23/76) (C) RECORDING FINAL PLAT: If the final plat is approved by the City Council, the subdivider shall record it with the County Recorder within one hundred (100) days after said approval. If the subdivider fails to so record the final plat, the approval shall be considered void, unless a request for time extension is submitted in writing and approved by the City Council prior to the expiration of the one hundred (100) day period. The subdivider shall, immediately upon recording, furnish the City Clerk with a print and reproducible tracing of the final plat showing evidence of recording. No building permits shall be let for construction of any structure on any lot said plat until the City has received evidence of the plat being recorded by the County. (#412, 8/23/04) (D) RECORDING OF MULTIPLE -PHASED PLATS: If a preliminary plat is final platted in stages, unless otherwise provided for in the development contract, all stages must be final platted into lots and blocks (not outlots) within three (3) years after the preliminary plat has been approved by the City Council. If the final plats are not approved and recorded in accordance with this time frame, the preliminary plat approval shall be considered void, unless a request for time extension is submitted in writing and approved by the City Council prior to the expiration of the three (3) year period. (#412, 8/23/04) MONTICELLO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE TITLE XI/Chapt 3/Page 3 A TH 1 1 (\ 11 A^ L) /1 A r-\ 0 1 �: I\ 00 0 (S 90°00' 00" E Plat �--EXISTING UTILITY EASEMENT f CREATED BY THE PLAT OF N 88°36'53" E ;i OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK s ---300.00--- --- 92.13--- ♦ r/' o o \ 150.00 0 34.81 \ 150.00 - - - - - - ro N .:,___-_----DRAINAGE AND --rte ---DRAINAGE AND-- r`rj / UTILITY EASEMENT UTILITY EASEMENT _ _ 2` -i 1 —� � i \ o / I 15 51 \ �,' rn I co I c 0)1 IN^ LO I I 1 _ WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 14, T. 121, R. 25 (FOUND P.K. NAIL) N 89'14'00" E -3123.56--- — I , I 1I--�55L-- -- -- -- __Ile� i o N N \ 149.95 1 % 150.00 i N 88'36'42' E i 1 I- N 8836'42" E ,'''---- ----- DRAINAGE AND ----------- - N z UTILITY EASEMENT5 5[ Q I- I I ; C)pz I3 I o 01 I ao I o o l I M Cfl tp N INDUSTRIAL PARK VICINITY MAP SECTION 14, T. 121, R. 25, WRIGHT COUNTY, MN 0 1000 2000 3000 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 1 INCH = 1000 FEET CHELSEA RD. 4 94 � I DUNDAS RD. 3 Q � I 'Z I II I -----29--y ----34--y1 _ _ _-�5 .5L-- -- -- -- o _ 149.91 U \\ 150.00 N 88'36'42" E o N 8836'42' E i ' '`_ _ _ _ _ DRAINAGE AND --''Lo 5 5� j i o _ O) . UTILITY EASEMENT --29-_- t- 00 C'20 I I L o n2 co I I I I me° o O N`p \`� co _ �z- :21 .. o / 5 00 0o i u p I (6 I P01 SERV 0 40 80 120 ----34- ---I / / �I I ��----''__-� > DRAINAGE AND I I UTILITY EASEMENT o GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET I �_ 55 _ � - - - -- 1 /NCH = 40 FEET A.N N 149.86 + ;; --160.00 150.00 1 a I/ N 88.36'42" E I y ' • DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND N 88'36'42" E N o N N N ' ' (6 O DENOTES IRON MONUMENT SET, MARKED BY LICENSE NO. 48664 -- -- —15 5F— i DENOTES CATCH BASIN TO BE CONSTRUCTED AT LOT CORNER �I DENOTES WRIGHT COUNTY ' I 0 'a MONUMENT FOUND wo A 1 1 I I 1= � I I: I BEARING ORIENTATION: o Z nI I °0 `a 8 I THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST 7 o N N 1/4 OF SECTION 14, T. 121, R. 25 IS 00 N "' NI I o I ASSUMED TO BEAR N 89°14'00" E. �N1 I IZ I I \� 55 --- 105.65 --- - ---105.82--- - �� - - - -�- N 88736'42" E �� N 88'36'42" E \ / C I \\';=---DRAINAGE AND n UTILITY EASEMENT--_:, KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That Kenneth J. Spaeth and Theresa L. Spaeth, husband and wife, owners of the following described property situated in the County of Wright, State of Minnesota, to wit: Lot 2, Block 3, OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK, Wright County, Minnesota. Have caused the some to be surveyed and platted as SPAETH INDUSTRIAL PARK and do hereby dedicate to the public for public use the drainage and utility easements as created by this plat. In witness whereof said Kenneth J. Spaeth and Theresa L. Spaeth, husband and wife, have hereonto set their hands this day of 20 Kenneth J. Spaeth Theresa L. Spaeth STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF This instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20 , by Kenneth J. Spaeth and Theresa L. Spaeth, husband and wife. (Signature) (Name Printed) Notary Public, County, Minnesota My Commission Expires I, Abram A. Niemela, do hereby certify that this plat was prepared by me or under my direct supervision; that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor in the State of Minnesota; that this plat is a correct representation of the boundary survey; that all mathematical data and labels are correctly designated on this plat; that all monuments depicted on this plat have been, or will be correctly set within one year, that all water boundaries and wet lands, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.01, Subd. 3, as of the date of this certificate are shown and labeled on this plat; and all public ways are shown and labeled on this plat. STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF WRIGHT Dated this day of , 20 Abram A. Niemela, Licensed Land Surveyor Minnesota License No. 48664 n The foregoing Surveyor's Certificate was acknowledged before me this day of 20 by Abram A. Niemela, Land Surveyor, Minnesota License No. 48664. EAST QUARTER CORNER OF--,' -SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST SECTION 1 T. R. 25 (FOUND WRIGHT COUNN TY MONON UMENT) 1 o 1 1 1/4 OF SECTION 14, T. 121, R. 25 i o � ii N 89'14'00" E -�- ' ------ -- ��------------------ �— --- 1899.53--- -- --- -f ---- i 149.80 ! 150.01 — - • - ——,�,_—=+ — — — — — — 5. 0 (300.02 Plat) %'EXISTING UTILITY EASEMENT N 89014'00" E `-SOUTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK CREATED BY THE PLAT OF (N 89°21'11" W Plat) (DOC.# 275353) AS MONUMENTED; ALSO NORTH LINE OF THE OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK PLAT OF KLEIN FARMS ESTATES 2ND ADDITION (DOC.# 753470) C L_ L_ I I �I r n Imo) A /l F- I _-- A --- T -- I /-\I \ IVI � L_� I/-\ I L_� n I n n n � I V L/ /-\ LJ J (Signature) (Name Printed) Notary Public, County, Minnesota My Commission Expires MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION This plat of SPAETH INDUSTRIAL PARK was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, at a meeting held this day of . 20 Chairperson Secretary CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA This plat of SPAETH INDUSTRIAL PARK was approved and accepted by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, at a regular meeting thereof held this day of 20 and said plat is in compliance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.03, Subd. 2. Mayor Clerk WRIGHT COUNTY SURVEYOR I hereby certify that in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.021, Subd. 11, this plat has been reviewed and approved this day of , 20 Wright County Surveyor WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITOR Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 272.12, there are no delinquent taxes on the land hereinbefore described on this plat and transfer entered this day of , 20 By: Wright County Auditor Deputy WRIGHT COUNTY TREASURER Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.021, Subd. 9, taxes payable for the year 20 on the land hereinbefore described have been paid this day of . 20 Wright County Treasurer By: Deputy WRIGHT COUNTY RECORDER I hereby certify that this instrument was filed in the office of the County Recorder for record on this 20 at o'clock .M., and was duly recorded in Cabinet No. , Sleeve day of as Document No. Wright County Recorder City Council Agenda: 06/25/2018 2R. Consideration of authorizing the preparation of an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for the proposed Haven Ridge development. (AS) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The developer of the proposed Haven Ridge development has requested that the City proceed with authorization of an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW). Haven Ridge is an approximately 217 acre development proposed along the south boundary of the City, within the Monticello Orderly Annexation Area. Developer Marc David Schulte's concept plan proposes a total of 359 units over the 217 acres. Due to the number of units within the development, at 273 unattached (single-family) and 76 units of attached (townhome) units, an EAW is required per Minnesota statutes. In addition, the EAW will address the conversion of more than 80 acres of agricultural and naturally vegetated land and any wetland conversions, as those categories may also be applicable. The property owner, Ronald and Lisa Denn and the Denn Family Partnership, have requested annexation of the parcels proposed to be platted as Haven Ridge. The City has acknowledged the petition for annexation and will review any final decision to annex in conjunction with future platting. As the property owner, working with the developer, intends to annex and plat the parcels within the City of Monticello, the City is the responsible government unit (RGU) for the EAW process. A scope of services, timeline and cost estimate for the EAW are attached for Council reference. This scope has been provided to the developer. The authorization of the EAW is contingent on the submission of the required deposit, in the amount of the proposed project cost, by the developer. Al. Budget Impact: There is no budget impact to the City. The developer is required to submit a deposit based on the estimated cost as detailed within the scope of service for the EAW. A2. Staff Impact: Staff, including the City Engineer/Public Works Director and Community Development Director, will be involved in the review and processing of the EAW document. As the city's designated consulting engineer, WSB has previously prepared the City's required EAW documents and assists the City with their RGU duties related to environmental permits. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to authorize the preparation of an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for the proposed Haven Ridge development, subject to a deposit in the amount of $34,903. 2. Motion of deny authorization for the preparation of an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for the proposed Haven Ridge development, based on findings to be made by the City Council. 3. Motion of other. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative #1 above. An Environmental Assessment Worksheet is required and the City may not approve a land use application until such time as the document and required environmental process has been completed. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Location Map B. Concept Plan — Haven Ridge C. Developer Authorization D. Scope of Services 2 Subject Parcels June 6, 2018 City Boundary Bryan Pittman CITV OF � Monticello 1 inch= 1,505 feet Map Powered by DataLink from WSB &Associates I I I T T-ri- I LrWort Fa��-.fin. ✓ �� I I '~ t�� ,� 6t ,•� LH ;IIJIIII I �, rTathaals Cou% .P� , � — -r T 1 � � 1. � /low L ( � I � )l J � �l � -..-41 10, Hunters ,.. 1 (� • ( T \ w `. Crossing Park U Z—f— J $5th Street NE� .. VIE] fjE1 UL' I / iMW �s--� lk -::A� cu cu 1 l 1 \ —) ( l y � � l 1 1► ; ., - \ - �/� \ \ , �' �� rte-`, -- ^ ��- ----- _ *, 46 �r \ �� ,� �, L - ,' /". / '�� 1 / �� I / •,. / �� /� 0 300 600 900 16 SCALE 1 — 300'NORTH c b '�2 1 • J • ♦ 7— .be If1 r -In I r' A [)A A•� I I I I I I I I I\\ Y"'�g --e \r \L_L_11 V 1 /-11 \IVIobe °hov'e ° `A T1 1 n/_/oha q6e \ oh \ t I r1 /1Uu1 I IlJ1 Obe 06 I I I \ o e \ °o C150 I I I I �5 - I�/ ��\�`�� '`\ v 015e\oha \ ° ea \ °h° \ \ I I �� 1 r-1 n 1 r' n [) A A ^ \ \ °he \ oha oha \1VI� °hO ohe \ 0/56 a \ \ oh v Tr; ,-1VU1 T IVI V oba ohe \ a %\ _ °ha oha \ oha \ °h e \ ohe ° e ° oh / _ ��I�./ I 1 T T r -r\ °h oh \ oha \ \_ �� j� \\ / 1 N // lJ I V I L _ /-1 1 1 L_ U ° \ o ° he \ °ehhe ` -- '1' '-` �_ n /♦^)1/♦1 11 TI 1^ n 1 he °ha \ h° \ �_ J /� / /1,Jr\IVVL_ 1 Vr;/"1L_ ohe oha \ \ \ °h° \ J \ oh° \ �Q � / %e\ e \ obe �° WETLANDS�� sa \ oh \ 0")e960 / 15 ��'+ 1�vA I r7r-11�V.�• � \ w,e \ °h, \_I \ \ ati t7C7I TIIIr-� ^-r/lnlr-�� -L).♦ - I I I I I \ / \� /o e e \ B / l / L �n Ir\ n rlrllTl/"\n l �I vu r,LILI 1 ►vl v I I I I I-7 1 1 11 n, I I r 1 UI V 1 L_ 1 \ .� \ \ `� �e e ` cwt\e �° ohe \ \ \� i / _ \ / -\ // / I/\ _ \� \ , 'H � \ ° oha \\/06 el \\ f 448 80— (% I (�I = �/ -, \_j( LJ— — O �j /__I V L./ 1 CITY n r\I \ITI/"1n I ,�(WanUUI 1 1VI V — \ \ o w,MONTICELLO I rI ,\ e \/ :: •� �-� I V / l ) ! _ \ ETLA�N DS b J�w In Ir TT A r -r1 UI Vi jL-/-% 1 1 L_ U ^ ♦ I / � n /\L)1/ 1 11 TI IL) A 1 )) 1 \ MONTICELLO \ \ter - r„JI \►uI.JL_\1 U1 \r,L_ � � 1 11 1 n ITE r -L) ` I /� \\ \ TO WNSHIP \ \ � I� \I Ido � ` / � —� �� /♦C)n.�.�In v\ I �-� �—�� J ( I � ; � \� \� � � fie\ � /– �� \\ � l � \l/^ WETLANDS o 011. Ob - ±2623 � —77, =� WETLAOO NDS �, i 7 / i �, \ e — 960— \ \ I �� 1 r l / l \\\ /I�\\ \ -960 `960 J 960 l \ O l ♦ �- �` ) ,��C��\/� \��/ / l°°/�\\�Ohe / \\\ �\\ l� \ �� J � � � \ �- � I , � �-- Ir °\\\ �;��e 0,1e \� X70 °neobe goo \ �' _ /� V� �—'WETLANDS —r ---960� I —�A\\� °he �e . \ \ I \ 960 _ - �I MONTICELLO C \ obe IL/ TOWNSHIP \ \ /loll \ \ ✓)±2276 n l�jl A \JC\1VUL. TU�\/-IL. � sos ;' /_ - ___• � � \ \ice � _� � � I � � \ o / ) 960 \ � � 1 In I�jl n TTr-r\ v1 L_/ WET L \ _ n /\[)1/♦1 11 TI 1^) n 1 LANDS \ \ 960 l\ 1( 1 \ \ \ n,Jl \IvVL_ I Vr\r,L. I IJ960\- / � \\ ,_), I jL _ /'1 T T L_ U 960 Q5 DS o \ \ EXISTING CONDITIONS \�\ � ±136 0 300 600 900 SCALE 1" = 300' NORTH[ SITE DATA +/— 216 Acres LEGAL DESCRIPTION Parcel ID — 21 31 00261 200 M Lr) Parts of Section —26 Township -121 z Range —25 Monticello TWP Parcel ID — 213100242200 UJ } LU p1 I pip Parts of Section —24 Township -121 Range —25 Monticello TWP Parcel ID — 21 31 002341 01 zo z Parts of Section —23 Township -121 Range —25 Monticello TWP Parcel ID — 21 31 002431 02 L� 0) Z _ .� 10 L LL Parts of Section —24 Township -121 W�m(3) o Range —25 Monticello TWP NOTES 1) No field work has been completed at this time. 2) Subject property address — South of Fallon Avenue and west of Highway 25, Monticello, MN 55362. 3) Topography shown is LIDAR which was provided by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. 4) No Title Work has been furnished for this survey, property is subject to all easements of record, if any. 5) Wetlands shown are approximate and NOT delineated. L z o �J M Lr) Z p z .� V o 0 UJ } LU p1 I pip O Lf) M N W zo z .. x mU �Vz��0 L� 0) Z _ .� 10 L LL W�m(3) o V') N O p) Ll d N ap=M Z 0 l0 000 U)M > z N Ld O L z o N M W Ln r n Ln V fB 00 H U-) z� W >0 —63 Q U_ O REVISIONS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. DRAWN BY: C# ISSUE DATE: 04/04/18 FILE NO: 7056 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 of0 6 L 0 QJ E �J Z p o a� .� V o 0 z ~ V = 4-1 O X W N M W Ln r n Ln V fB 00 H U-) z� W >0 —63 Q U_ O REVISIONS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. DRAWN BY: C# ISSUE DATE: 04/04/18 FILE NO: 7056 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 of0 6 L 0 QJ E -T T- I // I i� °15e �O 229 units / I-T---oh°\qys\ %6 1--, \ A ^ rr _,ZlA 1 r -' ` TI 1 AI'1r11T1/lAl I I I I I I I I I ATI \ t 1 r1 /�LJLJI 1 IVI V I �� ° %.e 0150 °KB \ °he \ \ I I °be ° 06, I / I �J e °�'° \°ob. 0156 \ 015 \ I I I �� 1 r1A ► r- A RA AIVi(` ° 06 ° ob.\ \ h^ I A I \ °he \015° ohe %o I 1v Tr1 UU/TIVIV , \ °he � %h° °15oobe %e°he Qye ohe °he I \ °he \ °he \ °he I . °he \ 015 \ o15e \ ohe \ °he \ % \°fie \ °he I °he \ °he \ \ °he zz \ \ \ Q5° � C'6.� 0/le 0%\ I 0-66\ ohe \ °h° T \ °Yi \ °he \ \ I A 1 A I A A � °he � qy° %o\li CITY OF MONTICELLO I vA I mnT� \°h° 6. �e�e Rl RESIDENTIAL _ ,,VVh ' \\��e �'° ° ° DISTRICT ► I I I i /° 0,5.- I e( oh °he �I \VV\%►1 V\7 / � �/ 7A In _ -/'9 L/ I IA l,�l A TTrr\ UL I URI JL- — — / riU►AVT►ERIr�. I _ D 85TFT-STREET-NE— — -- - MONTICELLO TD WNSHIP URBAN RESERVE r --i L_J r-� r---� -� L ---j Nzo I \ I MONTICELLO Tnwiv.�urp r ► IA lel A TT r-11 // I V/ V/ I L_I'1 1 1 L_LJ _ j A TI 1 ) A I POND ----/-��--- ,� FUTURE —POND —----� �� 79TH STREET NE URBAN RESERVE I IA 1[)1 A TTr-In VI VI L_/-1 I I LV A r'%RIINI 11 TIh I ) A l n��►-.VL_ ► VIL_ L I I I oI tie se\%e I \ Ohe \ I \ \ '. I 0158 \ °h, °he 015eob. h ° 1-- 015e e I °6° \ 06. °he °he e I°he � o°he \ ohe oh 015, \ OhO ° °h Oh ob. \ I a I \o"° \ %,° °he —� ohe o15 \ e 1 \ °he \ ° e \ %e \ OhO °he \ °he \ oh°he e ohe I _ °he, \ ohC \ �O °he \ \o6 \ � o,5,I ` \ o,5.\ °he °o,5.015 a o \ I e \ ohhe \ oe \< o,5.I % o%% \ \ °he / \ ° o", 1 \ °he \ ohe ohe ohe iobe \ ohe \ 0150 \ °he °he � ohe 0156 \ o/,. oh ohe \ 1 °,5e \ ohP \ ► \ °he \ oh / e PHASING PLAN MONTICELLO TO WNSHIP URBAN RESERVE 1 ►A 1[)1 A -r-rn VI Vl L_/ I Ir 1 LrLJ A /% 1)�1/%l 1/ -r 1�j A 1 n\JI \IvVL. 1 VR/lL_ PHASE 1 PRE FALLON AVE IMPROVEMENTS +/- 18.4 Acres R1 Units 28 units RA Units 0 units R3 Units 0 units PHASE 2 PRE FALLON AVE IMPROVEMENTS +/- 44 Acres R1 Units 53 units RA Units 0 units R3 Units 16 units FUTURE PHASE POST FALLON AVE IMPROVEMENTS +/- 153.6 Acres R1 Units 148 units RA Units 44 units R3 Units 60 units OVERALL SITE DATA +/- 216 Acres R1 Units 229 units RA Units 44 units R3 Units 76 units 0 300 600 900 SCALE 1" = 300' NORTH J Ln Z 1 ww rn 0Z) 1 to O Ln M W A _z o z FE O 2: X WW Q, L V Z 41 ra O � m 0 J V)< (QU) U p C;) gq2 Z -C o 00 wa Q)�CN � O � M Z cy) 00c) U ik: X r1l) Z v w C 0 Z n 0 ro Q 5. O J i a DRAWN BY: a ISSUE DATE: c FILE NO: o � a � H0 O Q� V U a xz C N M W Lr) Lf) LF) (>3 �4-) O H U-) c Z� W o Q a-) X V C O REVISIONS 3. n 0 4. -° 5. " 0 6. DRAWN BY: 0 C# ISSUE DATE: 04/04/18 FILE NO: 7056 M N E 10 0 10 n n 3 0 of a 6 v v 182 1,926 sq.ft. N 0 0 185 ±19,068 sq.ft. ±60,611 sq.ft. 37.0 32.0 37.0 37-0 32.0 32.0 37.E w O •� cfl----IIN N i N ---- p'------1 �p a: 1 L C4 X4 -H -H N N -H -H 37.0 32.0 37.0 37� 32.0 32.0 7.0 \ STREET -F -4-----I--- 37' 7 24.5 7.5 37.0 37.0 32.0 37.0 37.5 ■ 1 �i.4 37.0 V p O O N O O N p f!1 p iN }- � r- i r90 M� tWr W-- --04 -tom - --- -- pj-------EV -N ---' NN ---------' 04 04 -H -H-------H -H -H 32 A 0 l 37: 3" 32.0 32.0 3� O ±40,391 sq.ft. R3 - TOWN HOME AREA - s r s� s'r r i 1 i i I EXISTING WETLAND • i i i • i i i i • • A •s `+ s s ° i 46 16 2j OS' eQ 3-7.-b L73�.0 -- 0 60 120 180 SCALE 1" = 60' NORTH LOT SETBACK DATA m Ln FRONT: 30 FT. z SIDE: 10 FT. a a > w rn 0 CORNER: 25 FT. z O (n Lr) M (Az o z .. E 0) � x L w 0� , - Z� (u� uZ�� MINIMUM 20 BETWEEN BUILDINGS W fa °° rn UH o rn T --i 00 Z O' Zrn0 00 ) � M Z � _ 51 1 W PRO'OSED TOWNHOIIME a ------------, I I I GARAGE GARAGE GARAGE I I I I� ' I I W Q (AJ Q a� Q) W O. c � O a 0 � I V U Z 4-, 7C7 p 0 _C) N(L - - - - - - - O n W I I -UNIT TOWN HOME DETAIL o I 20 40 i N O N O w Q f; ro 00 O00 N N 44 -4 ■ � 32.0 - s r s� s'r r i 1 i i I EXISTING WETLAND • i i i • i i i i • • A •s `+ s s ° i 46 16 2j OS' eQ 3-7.-b L73�.0 -- 0 60 120 180 SCALE 1" = 60' NORTH LOT SETBACK DATA m Ln FRONT: 30 FT. z SIDE: 10 FT. a a > w rn 0 CORNER: 25 FT. z O (n Lr) M (Az o z .. E 0) � x L w 0� , - Z� (u� uZ�� MINIMUM 20 BETWEEN BUILDINGS W fa °° rn UH o rn T --i 00 Z O' Zrn0 00 ) � M Z � _ 51 1 W PRO'OSED TOWNHOIIME a ------------, I I I GARAGE GARAGE GARAGE I I I I� ' I I W Q (AJ Q a� Q) W O. c � O a 0 � I V U Z 4-, 7C7 p 0 _C) N(L - - - - - - - O n W I I -UNIT TOWN HOME DETAIL o I 20 40 w Q f; N 00 O00 ro N r N H -H 37.0 32.0 3' - s r s� s'r r i 1 i i I EXISTING WETLAND • i i i • i i i i • • A •s `+ s s ° i 46 16 2j OS' eQ 3-7.-b L73�.0 -- 0 60 120 180 SCALE 1" = 60' NORTH LOT SETBACK DATA m Ln FRONT: 30 FT. z SIDE: 10 FT. a a > w rn 0 CORNER: 25 FT. z O (n Lr) M (Az o z .. E 0) � x L w 0� , - Z� (u� uZ�� MINIMUM 20 BETWEEN BUILDINGS W fa °° rn UH o rn T --i 00 Z O' Zrn0 00 ) � M Z � _ 51 1 W PRO'OSED TOWNHOIIME a ------------, I I I GARAGE GARAGE GARAGE I I I I� ' I I W Q (AJ Q a� Q) W O. c � O a 0 � I V U Z 4-, 7C7 p 0 _C) N(L - - - - - - - O n W I I -UNIT TOWN HOME DETAIL o I 20 40 SCALE 1" = 20' N M W Ln� ru 0 li N C C 5 W - PROPOSED TOWNHOME i0 Q w ---------------------- U r a--� ;GARAGE GARAGE GARAGE I I GARAGE; � I W // \ REVISIONS < < �1. - 2. < D . 4 . .y .• .� - .. ,•. 5. 6. • DRAWN BY: C# ISSUE DATE: 04/04/18 FILE NO: 7056 D - - -Q N-- CL -� - - - - - - n C 4 -UNIT TOWN HOME DETAIL o 20 40 4 of SCALE 1" = 20' v 'TREE4 FEATURE AREA /01 1 , 1 EXISTING WETLAND 1 1 `% \ ohB \e ohe `I s \ oho \ oho e \ 0/50\ ohe oho 06, 060 \04, \ \ oho °he .y \ 0160 °he \ ° e \ 016e\ \ Jl \ °he\ °he \ °he \ °he \ oho oho \ Q60 \ oho oho ohe ohe oho I ohe \ \ \ \ ohs �0% °� \ °le \ °he oho a oho oho \ °ho \` e �h Ohs \ oh ohe 0h1 °he \ oh °h � 1 °he 4.1 SII ' i 1 .01 l 1 1 0 150 300 450 1 + SCALE 1" = 150' NORTH ---------------- I .. 90.0 ---- 80.0 80.0 } I • 87.4 116.1 138.5 z 128 o I 1'29 130 131 o ±13 500 s ft. lco:; 132 q ±12,000 sq.ft. ±12,000 sq.ft. o±12,420 sq.ft. co �o ±14,824 sq.ft. o z ? 133 I,...� •�------ -------------* -- � ±19,623 sq.ft. • Front Building Setback 134 ..:.i� 90.0 ? , - 80.0 ft 80.0 61.1 j 17.1 ±26,273 sq.ft. g-,* 72.5 �. 0) NU �sr I O - c) \ -tnn CL _ _ _ STREET C .y ............ �. J I—[ ------ ----- � 86.1 —_ — _-Setback - --Side Building B \'s 135 Side _ uildjD_g Setback 1 —_ ±24,378 sq.ft. 0 I 180 I 1'75 \ 20 f ±16,500 sq.ft. I tf1 ±18,433 sq.ft. \ \ r.L.; 165.0 I �� I h 151.8136 \ ±18,676 sq.ft. OR I 179 1D 176 \ Sot 2 G� ±13,961 sq.ft. ±23,657 sq.ft. o h NORTH EAST RESIDENTIAL — FEATURE RHEA 0 50 100 150 R1 — LOT DETAIL 1 t I I i I i i i i 1 I 12,000sf Lo oLOT AVERAGE i 30' MIN. REAR SETBACK r ROW 80' wo- LOT SETBACK DATA FRONT: 30 FT. SIDE: 10 174 REAR: 30 FT. CORNER: 20 FT. 12,000sf LOT AVERAGE 00 - O•�5z inN � (n M N 8- o z Q ±16,329 sq.ft. I J I Is 2: .. x Fri s U u w 0 Z -0 � fu � L w (m o� C:) rn um <�0 , � C))^ Z a Q) i �CN Z p� kO I M � N 1'77 O W \ I ` a 178 O ±16,357 sq.ft. 0 5 1 ±21,174 sq.ft.�, 16 \ `o o' ' - I 173 4.2 , \ ±12,003 sq.ft. "' \ 214.8 94.7 'o 01000 ftftft x,00 172 � ±12,241 sq.ft. NORTH EAST RESIDENTIAL — FEATURE RHEA 0 50 100 150 R1 — LOT DETAIL 1 t I I i I i i i i 1 I 12,000sf Lo oLOT AVERAGE i 30' MIN. REAR SETBACK r ROW 80' wo- LOT SETBACK DATA FRONT: 30 FT. SIDE: 10 FT. REAR: 30 FT. CORNER: 20 FT. 12,000sf LOT AVERAGE 30' FRONT SETBACK CURB SCALE 1" = 50' NORTH N M W Ln (u Ln 0 (o 0 O Ii C: Z C W >0 4X 7T) u O REVISIONS 1. 3 2. 3. 0 4. 5. 6. 5 0 DRAWN BY: C# Ln 04/04/18 z W CL z ru 41 U) LIJ ?' LU 00 - O•�5z inN � (n M N W Z tie0 z Q z E 0) 2: .. x m � U u w 0 Z -0 � fu � L w (m o� C:) rn um <�0 , � C))^ Z a Q) i �CN Z p� kO M ? z N Lu O a N M W Ln (u Ln 0 (o 0 O Ii C: Z C W >0 4X 7T) u O REVISIONS 1. 3 2. 3. 0 4. 5. 6. 5 0 DRAWN BY: C# ISSUE DATE: 04/04/18 z W CL 7056 M ru 41 U) 0 `) t � (n Q L a 0 _ O W Z tie0 = u O Z N M W Ln (u Ln 0 (o 0 O Ii C: Z C W >0 4X 7T) u O REVISIONS 1. 3 2. 3. 0 4. 5. 6. 5 0 DRAWN BY: C# ISSUE DATE: 04/04/18 z FILE NO: 7056 M 0 0 0 0 5 0 of0 6 QjE STREET I I I � I I 85TH STREET NE �7 ------------- FEATURE AREA , EXISTING WETLAND POND G owi OAF 05, Vro— op" WA ng Setba, i VAR 0 150 300 450 SCALE 1" = 150' NORTH all :i /�// • r f f �Y+• .jai i •`• : ;• .r r 'y. :: t• ~+ �• .:' •�• .7.� 1 .f'.y. 'f •• RA - LOT DETAIL --------------------------30' MIN. REAR 1 SETBACK 0 50 100 150 1 + SCALE 1" = 50' NORTH R1 - LOT DETAIL 30' MIN. REAR 1 SETBACK LOT SETBACK DATA 16,000sf FRONT: 30 FT. 0 AVERAGE LOT o SIDE: 10 FT. REAR: 30 FT. CORNER: 20 FT. 1 r v ROW -.00 100' 30' FRONT SETBACK CURB LOT SETBACK DATA 12,0FRONT: 30 FT. LOTT AVERAGE SIDE: 10 FT. REAR: 30 FT. CORNER: 20 FT. 1 r ROW 80' 30' FRONT SETBACK CURB N M W Ln Ln cu o H U-) Q) c Z W o >- TQ U i —63 a--+ c O REVISIONS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. DRAWN BY: C# ISSUE DATE: 04/04/18 FILE NO: 7056 6 0 of0 6Qjy 0 Ln 1 1 ------------- FEATURE AREA , EXISTING WETLAND POND G owi OAF 05, Vro— op" WA ng Setba, i VAR 0 150 300 450 SCALE 1" = 150' NORTH all :i /�// • r f f �Y+• .jai i •`• : ;• .r r 'y. :: t• ~+ �• .:' •�• .7.� 1 .f'.y. 'f •• RA - LOT DETAIL --------------------------30' MIN. REAR 1 SETBACK 0 50 100 150 1 + SCALE 1" = 50' NORTH R1 - LOT DETAIL 30' MIN. REAR 1 SETBACK LOT SETBACK DATA 16,000sf FRONT: 30 FT. 0 AVERAGE LOT o SIDE: 10 FT. REAR: 30 FT. CORNER: 20 FT. 1 r v ROW -.00 100' 30' FRONT SETBACK CURB LOT SETBACK DATA 12,0FRONT: 30 FT. LOTT AVERAGE SIDE: 10 FT. REAR: 30 FT. CORNER: 20 FT. 1 r ROW 80' 30' FRONT SETBACK CURB N M W Ln Ln cu o H U-) Q) c Z W o >- TQ U i —63 a--+ c O REVISIONS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. DRAWN BY: C# ISSUE DATE: 04/04/18 FILE NO: 7056 6 0 of0 6Qjy 0 Ln Archived: Thursday, June 7, 2018 1:43:54 PM From: Sent: Tuesday, June 5, 2018 4:22:52 PM To: Angela Schumann Cc: Subject: EAW approval to move forwarx Importance: Normal This is my acceptance and approval to move forward with the EAW. Marc Schulte Sent from my T -Mobile 4G LTE Device A WSB — 701 Xenia Avenue South []Suite 300 EMinneapolis, MN 55416 0(763) 541-4800 EUne 5, 2018 Ms. Angela Schumann Community Development Director City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street Monticello, MN 55362 Re: Scope of Work for Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) Haven Ridge Concept City Project No. 2018-020 WSB Project No. 011923-000 Dear Ms. Schumann: Outlined below, please find a scope of work for a proposed Haven Ridge residential development. It is our understanding that the approximate 216 -acre site may be developed into approximately 355 residential units based on the concept plan dated April 4, 2018. Scope o❑❑ ork Task 1 — Collect and AnalyEe Background In-ormation Background information from the developer and City will be collected and reviewed. This will include the concept plan, site history, and any engineering -related studies for the area. Additionally, data from various agencies such as the DNR Natural Heritage Database, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, County, and Minnesota Historical Society will be obtained. Task 2 — Describe Land Use and Geology Items 9 and 10 in the EAW relate to Land Use and Geology. Background information collected in Task 1 will be used to complete these sections, as well as any geotechnical data that may be available. Task ❑— ❑ ater Resource Analysis In the EAW, Item 11 covers analysis for surface water, groundwater, wastewater, stormwater, and water appropriation. To complete this section, a planning level stormwater analysis will be prepared for both existing and proposed conditions. For groundwater, existing soils mapping and groundwater information from the USGS will be used to analyze impacts to susceptible groundwater features in relation to proposed land use. Estimates of water use for municipal use will be developed based on proposed land use and residential units. For the wastewater analysis, estimates of wastewater generation will be developed and impact and need for infrastructure will be included in the EAW. Task 4 — Review o❑Contamination ❑❑aEardous ❑ astes If a Phase I or Phase II Environmental Site Assessment is available, this information will be used to complete this section of the EAW. If this information is not available, WSB will review the MPCA's "What's in My Neighborhood" database and available information about past uses and potential existing contamination. Information from the developer and the concept plan will be used to determine if there is potential for hazardous waste generation from the project. Task 5 — Review o❑Fish and ildli-e Information from the DNR Natural Heritage Database will be obtained and a review of the site will be used to describe and evaluate wildlife impacts to the area. This will be incorporated into the EAW. Building a legacy —your legacy. Equal Opportunity Employer ovsbeng.com K: 011923-000 Admin Docs LTR - 060518 - aschumann EAW.docx Ms. Angela Schumann ❑une 5, 2018 Page 2 Task ❑- Review o-❑istoric Properties, Visual Impacts, and Parks Information from the State Historical Preservation Office, as well as the City's and County's Comprehensive Plans, will be used to determine if there are impacts to historic properties, parks, or if there will be visual impacts. Based on our understanding of the site and proposed development, we do not expect there will be visual impacts per the EAW guidelines. Information developed will be used to complete the EAW. Task ❑ - Tra❑nc Analysis As part of this task, WSB will prepare a Traffic Study documenting the impacts the proposed project will have on the study area's adjacent roadways. Available data will be collected from the City, Wright County, MnDOT and other impacted agencies. It is assumed that new traffic volume data will be collected at up to six adjacent intersections and roadways. The study will include a traffic generation analysis and traffic forecasts for the study area for up to three build years including the 2040 conditions. Traffic analysis will be conducted based on the forecasted traffic volumes on the impacted roadways. This will be conducted using the Synch ro/S i m Traffic modeling software and will include a capacity and Level of Service (LOS) Analysis at each impacted intersection and a Queuing Analysis showing the required length of queues at each intersection for each analysis year. A safety analysis will also be completed to document any safety issues within the study area. If mitigation is needed, it will be noted in the EAW. Task 8 - Air Quality and Noise Analysis A study level analysis of the air quality and noise impacts from the project will be included in the EAW. Air quality and noise monitoring or modeling are not expected to be required. Should additional information be requested by an agency, we will discuss the amended scope with the City at that time. Task I -Review o Cumulative Potential E❑ects WSB will work with City staff to determine if there were recent past developments or known proposed future developments in the area to address cumulative effects. This will be compiled into Item 19 of the EAW. Task 10 - Complete EA❑ Document and Submit Cor Comment Period A draft EAW will be prepared and reviewed with the City and developer. This task includes one round of revisions, based on staff review. Once final, the EAW will be provided to City Council and attendance at one City Council meeting is included with this task. The document will then be submitted to the agencies for the 30 -day comment period. Task 11 - Respond to EAC Comments and Prepare Final Documents Once comments are received, WSB will prepare responses to comments, a Findings and Conclusions document, and decision documents for the City Council. The purpose of an EAW is to determine whether an EIS is needed and to inform permitting decisions. These decision documents will be prepared based on the results of the EAW for the City Council to consider as part of this task. It is difficult to scope out the level of effort needed to respond to comments since comments are currently unknown. A typical level of effort for past EAW's is included with the cost. However, if significant comments are received, we will discuss amending the scope with the City. Cost Estimate The estimated cost to complete the above work plan for the EAW is $34,903. We can develop a detailed timeline once the scope of work is authorized. Typically, the full EAW process can be completed within 3.5 to 5 months. K: 011923-000 Admin Docs LTR - 060518 - aschumann EAW.docx Ms. Angela Schumann Lune 5, 2018 Page 3 If you have questions, please feel free to call me at (763) 287-7196. Sincerely, WSB & Associates, Inc. Andrea Moffatt Principal/Manager KIM 1923-000[Admin[Doc [LTR - 060518 - aschumann EAW.docx Haven Ridge EAW Principal Approximate Billing 8 $1,384 Task $83 Estimated Hours Subtotal Subtotal Rate 18 $2,214 Collect Background Information 121 $10,690 Principal $173 8 $1,384 Environmental Scientist $83 10 $830 Subtotal $50 18 $2,214 Land Use and Geology 121 $10,690 Principal $173 1 $173 Environmental Scientist $83 6 $498 Subtotal $88 7 $671 Water Resource Analysis 18 $2,016 Principal $173 6 $1,038 Environmental Scientist $83 20 $1,660 Engineer $117 32 $3,744 Subtotal 58 $6,442 Contamination/Hazardous Wastes Principal $173 2 $346 Environmental Scientist $83 8 $664 Subtotal 10 $1,010 Fish and Wildlife $182 15 $2,730 Environmental Scientist $83 6 $498 Subtotal $50 6 $498 Historic, Visual, Parks 121 $10,690 Environmental Scientist $83 2 $166 Subtotal $160 2 $166 Traffic Analysis $88 12 $1,056 Principal $182 15 $2,730 Engineer $88 70 $6,160 Traffic Counts $50 36 $1,800 Subtotal 121 $10,690 Air and Noise Sr. Engineer $160 6 $960 Engineer $88 12 $1,056 Subtotal 18 $2,016 Cumulative Potential Effects Principal $173 2 $346 Environmental Scientist $83 4 $332 Subtotal 6 $678 Complete EAWand Comment I I I I Period Principal $173 15 $2,595 GIS Specialist $86 12 $1,032 Environmental Scientist $83 24 $1,992 Subtotal 51 $5,619 Respond to Comments and Final Documents Principal $173 24 $4,152 Environmental Scientist $83 15 $1,245 Subtotal 39 $5,397 TOTAL 330 $34,903 hrs for Shibani City Council Agenda: 06/25/2018 2S. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2018-51 authorizing execution and filing of petition to reopen proceedings related to the transfer of portions of Wright County Ditch 33 to the Citv of Monticello (JO) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The Wright County Board of Commissioners proposes this process to enable Wright County, as the Drainage Authority for Wright County Ditch 33, to take the leadership role in repairing a long-standing drainage problem. In 2006 the City gained partial authority for managing Ditch 33 in conjunction with the proposed Hidden Forest and Niagara Falls subdivisions. These projects stalled and construction of storm water systems and associated relief of drainage problems with Ditch 33 never occurred. The Wright County Board of Commissioners is interested in having its authority reinstated to repair the system and provide relief to a number of property owners affected by high water. Reinstatement of authority can only occur if the City requests that the authority it gained in 2006 is transferred back to Wright County. If approved by Council, the action will pave the way for a ditch repair project which will be funded at least in part by assessments against properties within the watershed. As a contributor of water to the watershed, the City will be responsible for paying its pro rata share as one large property owner. This expense could potentially be funded by a future storm water utility fund. Transferring ditch authority back to the County and the approach used for correction of the drainage problems in a rural setting may or may not be sufficient for future urban development in the area. Bret Weiss, who was highly involved with the 2006 study, noted, "I agree that this makes sense to complete at this time since the development never occurred. I didn't see any of the information related to what is occurring today and what the proposed fix is. Unless there is a significant fix at this time or planned in the future, if the Niagara Falls and Hidden Forest developments ever move forward, it is unlikely that they will be able to discharge through the existing ditch. There would just be too much of an impact. " Given the comments by Bret Weiss, it is important that the City be engaged in the project and look for design opportunities to enable integration of future City systems over time. The attached resolutions were prepared by John Kolb, hired by Wright County, who is an attorney with specific experience and knowledge of "ditch law." He has been helpful in determining the steps necessary to facilitate the project. City attorney Joel Jamnik concurs with the analysis and with the suggested process by Mr. Kolb. It is proposed that the City fund the cost to reopen the proceedings related to the transfer of portions of Wright County Ditch 33 since the City, by its action to facilitate development in 2006, is now inadvertently blocking the ability of the County to otherwise exercise its authority to repair the ditch. Al. Budget Impact: The Attorney secured by Wright County has indicated that they do not have an exact estimate but they do not anticipate the amount to exceed $5,000 which is to be funded via the trunk storm sewer fund. Cost of the repair to the city share of the watershed remains to be seen. City Council Agenda: 06/25/2018 A2. Staff Workload Impact: General support and participation in the study and project as it unfolds. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to adopt resolution authorizing execution and filing of petition to reopen proceedings related to the transfer of portions of Wright County Ditch 33 to the City of Monticello 2. Motion to deny adoption of resolution authorizing execution and filing of petition to reopen proceedings related to the transfer of portions of Wright County Ditch 33 to the City of Monticello C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative 1 D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Copy of Petition B. Resolution 2018-51 STATE OF MINNESOTA WRIGHT COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SITTING AS THE DRAINAGE AUTHORITY FOR WRIGHT COUNTY DITCH 33 In the Matter of: ; PETITION OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO REQUESTING RE - The Transfer of Portions of Wright OPENING OF PROCEEDINGS County Ditch 33 to the City of ; AND PARTIAL RESCISSION OF Monticello ORDER The City of Monticello (City), for its petition in the above -captioned matter states and alleges the following: 1. In 2006, the City petitioned the Wright County Board of Commissioners, sitting as the Drainage Authority for Wright County Ditch 33 ("CD 33"), to take certain actions related to CD 33. 2. Among other things, the City requested that portions of CD 33 be transferred to the City pursuant to statutes section 103E.812. 3. The City filed its petition in order to facilitate proposed residential development in annexation areas adjacent to the City under the belief that the development and annexation were imminent. 4. The City anticipated, and conveyed to the Drainage Authority, that with the development and annexation, the drainage system would be relocated, as part of the City's stormwater plan, to annexed portions of the City. 5. Upon findings and by order dated September 13, 2006, the Drainage Authority authorized transfer of portions of CD 33 to the City. 6. After transfer, the proposed development failed. 7. While the annexation did occur, the development that would have justified relocation of the drainage system did not occur. For this reason, the Drainage Authority's order essentially transferred portions of CD 33 lying outside of the City's boundary to the City. 8. Statutes section 103E.812 only allows the transfer of portions of a drainage system to a City when the portions to be transferred lie "within the boundaries of the city." [10496-0002/3032509/1] 1 9. For this reason, the City believes both its action in petitioning for the partial transfer and the Drainage Authority's action granting the transfer were improper and without legal authority. 10. The City, therefore, petitions the Drainage Authority for the following: a. To re -open the proceedings related to the City's petition to transfer a portion of CD 33; b. To notice and hold a hearing consistent with the requirements of statutes section 103E.812; and c. To rescind that portion of its September 13, 2006, order transferring portions of CD 33 to the City. 11. The City acknowledges that, as a governmental entity, no cash bond is required with this petition. However, pursuant to statutes section 103E.812, subd. 6, costs, including engineering and attorney's fees, related to the proceedings to transfer a drainage system must be paid by the proposed transferee and, pursuant to statutes section 103E.202, the City agrees to pay the costs incurred in the action. The City requests, however, to the extent CD 33 is benefitted by rescission of the order transferring portions thereof, that the Drainage Authority consider what portion of the proceedings may be paid for by the drainage system. 12. This petition is made and authorized by duly approved action of the City Council of the City of Monticello. a Brian Stumpf, Its Mayor Attest: Jeff O'Neill, Its City Administrator [10496-0002/3032509/1] 2 Dated: CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2018-51 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION AND FILING OF PETITION TO RE- OPEN PROCEEDINGS RELATED TO THE TRANSFER OF PORTIONS OF WRIGHT COUNTY DITCH 33 TO THE CITY OF MONTICELLO WHEREAS, in 2006 the City petitioned the Wright County Board of Commissioners, seated as Drainage Authority for Wright County Ditch (CD) 33, among other things, to transfer portions of CD 33 to the City; and WHEREAS, the petitioned action was premised on the City's belief that development and annexation in the area of the drainage system transfer was imminent; and WHEREAS, it was anticipated that with the development and annexation, the drainage system would be relocated, as part of the City's stormwater plan, to annexed portions of the City; and WHEREAS, while the annexation did occur, the development that would have justified relocation of the drainage system did not occur; and WHEREAS, statutes section 103E.812 only allows drainage system transfer to a city where the portion of the drainage system to be transferred is "within the boundaries of the city;" and WHEREAS, THE City Council believes it appropriate to request correction of the transfer by petition to the Drainage Authority to re -open proceedings and seek rescission of the portion of the Drainage Authority's order transferring the drainage system. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council authorizes the Mayor and City Administrator to execute the attached petition and to file the same with the Drainage Authority for further proceedings. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTICELL0 ON THIS 25TH DAY OF JUNE, 2018. CITY OF MONTICELLO Brian Stumpf, Mayor ATTEST: Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator City Council Agenda: 06/25/2018 2T. Consideration of approving purchase of shimmer wall artwork to be located at 112 Broadwav East from Radiant Manufacturing for $12,418.00. (TP) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: On May 14, 2018, the City Council approved the acceptance of a grant from the Central Minnesota Arts Board for $13,048 to be used to offset costs associated with this art project. Our creative arts consultant, Sue Seeger, helped to identify and design this project. As this type of project is highly specialized, the timing of the grant forced us to be creative in our approach; allowing any local 2D artist to apply. Radiant Manufacturing was the only manufacturer capable of creating this type of unique display. Al. Budget Impact: The CMAB grant will cover a significant portion of the project and will be supplemented by an in-kind donation in the form of labor and equipment for the installation. The remaining budget impact for the city will be approximately $2,500.00. A2. Staff Workload Impact: There will be a workload impact for the Public Works Department to install the artwork this summer. City staff will also assist with promotion of the project as needed. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the purchase of shimmer wall artwork to be located at 112 Broadway East from Radiant Manufacturing for $12,418.00. 2. Motion to deny the purchase of the shimmer wall artwork. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends Alternative 1. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Quote from Radiant Manufacturing Radiant Mfg 61 Chimuza St, Rock Springs, WY, 82901 Primary Email: info@radiantmfg.com Primary Phone: +1 754-300-4368 Fax: +1 307-212-4604 www.radiantmfg.com RADIANT MANUFACTURING Quote 1101 SALES REP INFO QUOTE DATE Sue Seeger Roman Z Shwed 04/02/2018 Sue Seeger City of Monticello 10x30 Wall Display Formal Managing Director roman@radiantmfg.com QUOTE DUE DATE 754-300-4374 04/27/2018 Quote 4.2.2018 QUOTE EXPIRY 10'x30' Lake Mural SolaRay Sequin Public Wall Feature DATE Total production area 300 sqft. 05/02/2018 Absorbing Coating. SolaRay sequin panels to be permanently mounted to matching 4 -Color CMYK TERMS printed 3mm Aluminum Composite signage substrate (ACM) with 10 -year Overlaminate. Due on receipt Display to be securely crated and palletized for FedEx Piority LTL Freight shipping to the City of PAYMENT Monticello Public Works building. METHOD ORDERED BY SHIPPING ADDRESS INSTALL ADDRESS CONTACT INFO Sue Seeger Monticello Public Works Monticello Public Works Sue Seeger Monticello Public Works 909 Golf Course Road 909 Golf Course Road pseudosu64@gmail.com 909 Golf Course Road Monticello, MN, 55362, United Monticello, MN, 55362, United +1 612-414-2155 Monticello, MN, 55362, United States of America States of America States of America Attn:City of Monticello MN Attn:City of Monticello MN Attn:City of Monticello MN ABOUT THIS QUOTE 10'x30' Lake Mural SolaRay Sequin Public Wall Feature Total production area 300 sqft. Display to be printed in 4 -Color CMYK on 1.5" White Square SolaRay sequin panels with DuraGuard UV Absorbing Coating. SolaRay sequin panels to be permanently mounted to matching 4 -Color CMYK printed 3mm Aluminum Composite signage substrate (ACM) with 10 -year Overlaminate. SolaRay feature to be produced in 14 section; 12 - 4'x5' sections and 2 - 2'x5' sections. Display to be securely crated and palletized for FedEx Piority LTL Freight shipping to the City of Monticello Public Works building. Production time 10 to 15 business days. FedEx Priority LTL Freight transit time 3 to 4 business days. # ITEM 1 Custom Print 1.5" Sq SR Silver Custom Printed 1.5" Square SolaRay square ft. panel(s) on Silver Film 2 MISC INVENTORY DuraGuard UV Absorbing Coating for Custom Printed SolaRay sequin panels. 3 Printer Setup Printer Setup Charge 4 Substrate & Sign Mat. 120"x48"x3mm Aluminum Composite Signage Substrate 5 Background Print 4 -Color CMYK UV printed background artwork 6 MISC INVENTORY 10 -Year Overlaminate for 4 -Color CMYK printed ACM 7 Labor Sign Production Labor for Custom Sign Production 8 Crating Fee Palletizing and Crating of Custom Work UOM UNIT PRICE TOTAL (EXCL. TAX) 300.0 Each $17.00 $5,100.00 300.0 Each $5.00 $1,500.00 1.0 Each $140.00 $140.00 7.0 Each $184.00 $1,288.00 300.0 Each $2.50 $750.00 300.0 Each $5.00 $1,500.00 21.0 Each $70.00 $1,470.00 1.0 Each $250.00 $250.00 PRINTED ON 2018-04-02 17:34:10 -0600 BY RS CREATED BY RS 1/2 QUOTE 1101, SUE SEEGER, 04/02/2018 Quotes are valid for 30 days.All quotes are subject to the attached terms and conditions. Costs of collections/attorney's fees will be added hereto in the event an attorney's services are required in collection of this order. Downpayment (100.0 %) SIGNATURE: Setup: $0 Shipping: $420.00 Misc. Charges: $0 Subtotal: $12,418.00 Sales Tax (0%): $0 Total: $12,418.00 $12,418.00 DATE: PRINTED ON 2018-04-02 17:34:10 -0600 BY RS CREATED BY RS 2/2 City Council Agenda: 6/25/2018 2U. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2018-56 regarding Minnesota Investment Fund (MIF) 80-20 Opt Out Program (JT, AS, WO) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The City Council is asked to consider Resolution 2018-56 regarding opting out of the Minnesota Investment Fund (MIF) requirements for use of the State grant dollars. The Monticello MIF Loan Program currently has $519,237. The legislature approved an optional opt out freeing up the Loan Program from various usage rules .... if the City Council so chooses. The State offer makes using the MIF dollars completely flexible for 80 percent of the Fund in exchange for sending 20 percent of the funds back to the State. The opt out time period ends June 30, 2018. The EDA reviewed the Pros and Cons of each choice provided below and recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution 2018-56 sending 20 percent of the MIF dollars back to the State. la. Keeping All MIF Dollars - Pros ✓ Keeping the full amount of existing MIF funds maintains a larger amount of funding for eligible industrial projects ✓ The most problematic provision that will always exist only kicks in only on loans larger than $500,000 (Davis -Bacon Wage Rates for contracted labor on construction and equipment installation) ✓ Staff can learn to manage without invoking restrictions lb. Keeping All MIF Dollars — Cons ✓ There will always be various State restrictions, Davis -Bacon Wage Rates > $500K ✓ Have to manage funds skillfully to avoid invoking restrictions 2a. Returning 20% of MIF Dollars to State - Pros ✓ Returning 20% allows City/EDA to use the funds for "ANY"purpose, which may include other priorities or needs ✓ Potential benefit of elimination of annual accounting reporting to MN -DEED 2b. Returning 20% of MIF Dollars to State — Cons ✓ Diminished MIFAccount due to giving $103,847 back to State ✓ Potential reduction in ability to provide multiple "business subsidy" size loans ✓ Initial accounting and explanation report on use of funds required by February 15, 2019 Al. STAFF IMPACT: There is a minimal staff impact from consideration of the MIF Opt Out. A2. BUDGET IMPACT: The cost to the Monticello MIF Loan Program is 20 percent of the current Fund balance. The amount that would be sent back to the State is $103,847 B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to adopt Resolution 2018-56 authorizing the City to participate in the MIF Opt Out Program by sending $103,847 +/- back to the State and thereafter splitting the remaining $415,390.00 on a 50-50 basis with the EDA and designating those dollars to implementation of the Downtown Small Area Plan. City Council Agenda: 6/25/2018 2. Motion to deny adoption of Resolution 2018-56 authorizing the MIF Opt Out Program by sending $103,847 +/- back to the State. 3. Motion to table consideration of Resolution 2018-56 for further research or discussion. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative 41. Staff fully supports the EDA position of participating in the MIF opt -out program and utilizing the remaining 80 percent of the dollars to pursue implementation of the Downtown Small Area Study recommendations. The EDA premised its recommendation on the belief that it currently has sufficient loan program dollars (GMEF and SCDP) and can better utilize unrestricted MIF funds (useable for any legal expenditure) for other purposes. Specifically, those dollars could possibly be used by the City to implement the public infrastructure improvement recommendations for the downtown area and by the EDA to pursue additional land acquisition or to establish a commercial property rehabilitation grant program. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Resolution 2018-56 B. MIF Opt Out Summary C. MIF Program Guidelines Promulgated by MN -DEED 2 CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2018-56 RESOLUTION APPROVING TRANSFER TO STATE OF CERTAIN MONEYS RECEIVED FROM MINNESOTA INVESTMENT FUND WHEREAS, the City of Monticello (the "City") has previously received funds awarded by the State of Minnesota (the "State") pursuant to its Minnesota Investment Fund ("MIF") program, as authorized under Minnesota Statutes, Section 116J.8731 (the "Act"); and WHEREAS, the City previously designated the City of Monticello Economic Development Authority (the "Authority") as the administrator of the MIF awards; and WHEREAS, the Authority, as the administrator of the Monticello MIF Loan Program for the City, has determined that there is currently a balance of $519,237 in uncommitted money received from repayment of MIF awards (the "Uncommitted Funds"); and WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Laws 2017, Chapter 94, Article 6, Section 24 (the "2017 Law"), the State has authorized a one-time exception to the general restrictions on the use of MIF awards under the Act, providing that if a city, county, or town that has uncommitted money received from repayment of MIF awards and transfers twenty percent (20%) of the balance of that money to the State general fund prior to June 30, 2018, the city, county, or town may use the remaining eighty percent (80%) of the uncommitted money as a general purpose aid for any lawful expenditure; and WHEREAS, on June 13, 2018, the Board of Commissioners of the Authority approved the transfer of $103,847 in Uncommitted Funds to the State general fund in accordance with the 2017 Law which would leave a balance of $415,389 in Uncommitted Funds; and WHEREAS, upon the recommendation of the Authority, the City as the original grantee of the MIF Funds has determined that it is in the best financial interest of the City to exercise its option to transfer $103,847 in Uncommitted Funds to the State, such that the remaining $415,389 in Uncommitted Funds will be available to the Authority and the City without the restrictions on use required under the Act. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council as follows: 1. The City hereby approves the transfer of $103,847 of Uncommitted Funds to the State general fund, pursuant to the 2017 Law. 527992v1 MNI MN190-101 2. City staff and EDA staff are hereby authorized and directed to take all actions necessary to effectuate such transfer prior to June 30, 2018, pursuant to the requirements of the 2017 Law, and to transmit such funds along with a certified copy of this Resolution to the State. Approved by the City Council of the City on June 25, 2018. Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk 2 527992v1 MNI MN190-101 RELEVANT LINKS: The additional day could have financial implications for cities operating municipal liquor stores, and enforcement of the licensing ordinance for one more day a week may in some situations mean added costs. 2017 Minn. Laws ch 26, § 1 National Night Out and Other Community Events. As of May 3, 2017, to be codified as Minn. Stat. § 471.198. any city may spend money for National Night Out events held within that city. Additionally, any city may spend money for any event or purpose that the council determines will foster positive relationships between law enforcement and the community. Cities may by resolution authorize officials and staff to solicit contributions or fundraise for these purposes. 2017 Minn. Laws ch 29, § 1 Awards and Trophies. Prior to now, cities have been limited to spending no amending Minn. Stat. § 415.15. more than $800 annually on awards and trophies as part of a recreation program. As of May 12, 2017, there is no statutory limit on the amount of funds cities may use to pay for awards and trophies. 2017 Minn. Laws 1st Spee. Government-owned well maintenance fee abolished. Cities have always Sess. ch. 6, art. 10, § 22 amending Minn. Stat. § been subject to a $50 monitoring fee for unsealed wells. Effective July 1, that 1031.208, subd. 2. fee is eliminated for any government-owned wells. 2017 Minn. Laws ch. 94, art. Building permit fees. Building permit fee amounts have been amended 2 § 5 amending Minn. Stat. § 326B.153. slightly. The increases are effective July 1, 2017, but set to expire October 1, 2021. 2017 Minn. Laws ch. 94, art. Electrical utility assessment. Effective July 1, 2017, the maximum amount 8 § 8 amending Minn. Stat. § 216B.62, subd. 3b. the Department of Commerce can assess for performing its duties has been reduced to $500,000 from $1,000,000. The amended subdivision will expire Ju e- 0 .._MLB.—e. _ 2017 Minn. Laws ch. 94, art.CException to Minnesota Investment Fund. Effective July 1, 2017, cities 6§24. uncommitted money received from repayment of funds may choose to20% of the funds back to the state general fund before(une 30, 2018) emaining 80% of the uncommitted funds can then be used for any l expend 2017 Minn. Laws V Spec. Penalty for Unauthorized Diversion Program. Effective May 31, 2017, a Sess. ch 1, art. 4, § 18 to be codified as Minn. Stat. § city that is determined by a court to be operating a pretrial diversion program 477A.0175. without statutory authorization under section 169.999 (administrative traffic penalties) or any other law must have its aid reduced. The aid is to be reduced by the amount of fees collected through the program. Taxpayers are explicitly authorized by this new law to seek a declaratory judgment action (or other relief) to determine if the program is unauthorized. Any reduction will take effect following the court's finding against aid payments as early as 2018. League of Minnesota Cities Information Memo: 6/21/2017 Budget Guide for Cities Page 2 Minnesota Investment Fund (MIF) / Minnesota Department of Employment and Economi... Page 1 of 2 EMPLOYMENT AND ECONOMIC, DEVELOPMENT Minnesota Investment Fund The Minnesota Investment Fund provides financing to help add new workers and retain high-quality jobs on a statewide basis. The focus is on industrial, manufacturing, and technology -related industries to increase the local and state tax base and improve economic vitality statewide. One -Time Exception The Minnesota Legislature has authorized a one-time exception to how revolving loan fund (RLF) dollars seeded from State funded Minnesota Investment Fund (MIF) project are used. Learn more (/deed/business/financin.g-business/deed-pro,Rrams/mif/mif-exception/index.isp). For More Information Contact the Office of Business Finance(mai Ito: Business. Finance@state.mn.us) at 651-259-7430 or toll-free at 800-657-3858. Overview l I Apply l I Forms l I RLF Guides Revolving Loan Fund Guides Federally Funded Revolving Loan Fund Funding Map l ( Contacts l Guidelines (/deed/assets/federal-rlf-guidelines tcm1045-131660.pdf) When a MIF loan is funded by federal dollars (for example: Community Development Block Grant - Economic Development), any loan repayments to a local revolving loan fund must be administered according to federal guidelines. These guidelines will help local governments use the federal dollars to encourage business development. Annual Report Form (/deed/assets/federal-rlf-annual-report tcm1045-131659.pdf) The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development requires that all local governments that receive HUD CDBG-ED funds from DEED's MIF report annually on the status of these dollars if placed in a revolving loan fund account. Complete the following form(s) and return no later than October 25. State -Funded Revolving Loan Fund • Guidelines (/deed/assets/state-rlf-guidelines tcm1045-131664.pdf) Although they are not subject to the same restrictions as federal funding, revolving loan funds capitalized with repayments from state -funded loans must adhere to MIF re -use policies, which are guided by state law. • Annual Report Form (/deed/assets/state-mif-rlf-annual-report tcm1045-131 663.pdf) DEED is collecting information on the status of local revolving loan funds seeded by state -funded https:Hmn.gov/deed/business/financing-business/deed-programs/mif/ 12/14/2017 Minnesota Investment Fund (MIF) / Minnesota Department of Employment and Economi... Page 2 of 2 MIF. Complete the following form and return it to your DEED loan officer no later than October 25. For More Information Questions about the use of revolving loan funds? Contact the DEED loan officer in your region (see Contacts tab). / https://mn.gov/deed/business/financing-business/deed-programs/mif/ 12/14/2017 July 2014 OPERATING GUIDELINES FOR REVOLVING LOAN FUNDS SEEDED BY STATE MINNESOTA INVESTMENT FUND AWARDS A local unit of government may establish a Revolving Loan Fund (RLF) with funds from a variety of sources. The guidelines outlined in this document pertain only to a RLF seeded with funds received through the repayment of a loan provided from the state -funded Minnesota Investment Fund (MIF) or Economic Recovery Fund programs administered through the Department of Employment and Economic Development or its predecessors. The local government must follow the RLF guidelines that were submitted with the initial MIF application and approved by your DEED Senior Loan Officer. Although the guidelines provide the policies and procedures for the reuse of these funds, the RLF policies and procedures must also adhere to the same requirements that are followed by the state's Minnesota Investment Fund program. In addition to the local government's underwriting criteria, the guidelines from Minn. Stat. 116J.8731 (some of which is summarized below) and from the Minnesota Business Subsidy Law (Minn. Stat. 116J. 993 and 116J.994) must be included in the policies and procedures General Purposes and Guidelines for RLFs Seeded bl+ the Minnesota Investment Fund Purpose and Goals The purpose of the RLF is to provide financial and technical assistance for the creation and retention of new employment. These objectives may be accomplished through the following means: 1. Create/retain permanent private sector jobs to fuel above-average economic growth consistent with environmental protection; 2. Investment in technology and equipment that increase productivity and provide for higher wages; 3. Leverage of private investment to ensure economic renewal and competitiveness; 4. Increase the local tax base to guarantee a diversified industry mix; 5. Improve the quality of existing jobs, based on increases in wages or improvements in the job duties, training, or education associated with those jobs; 6. Improve employment and economic opportunities and create a reasonable standard of living; and 7. Enhance productivity growth through improved manufacturing or new technologies. One way to meet these objectives is to assist businesses that have location options outside Minnesota. These firms bring income into the state and raise the overall standard of living. Eligible Expenditures The MIF -seeded funds may be used in a variety of ways include example noted below. More information is available in Minn. Stat. 116.1.8731 and through conversations with your loan officer. 1. Provide loans, loan guarantees, interest buy -downs, and other forms of participation, ensuring that RLF funds are matched by private financing. 2. Fund strategic investments in renewable energy market development. Any expenditure for external marketing for renewable energy market development is not subject to the matching requirements listed above. Provide entrepreneurs with training, other technical assistance, and financial assistance as defined by federal guidelines. July 2014 Eligible Projects Assistance must be evaluated on the existence of the following conditions as noted in Minn. Stat. 116J.8731: 1. Creation or retention of jobs, or the improvement of jobs as measured by wages, skills or knowledge; 2. Increase in the tax base; 3. Attraction of private funds to the project; 4. Incapacity of local communities and finance partners to finance project; 5. Results in higher wage levels or workforce skills; 6. Supports development of microenterprises, as defined by federal guidelines, through technical assistance or financial assistance. 7. Need for assistance to retain existing business; 8. Importance of assistance to attract out-of-state business; and 9. The project promotes or advances the green economy. The assistance cannot meet solely 7. or 8.; other conditions must also be present. Eligible Activities RLF's may be used to fund a variety of business activities including: 1. Acquisition of land 2. Construction or rehabilitation of facilities 3. Site improvements 4. Utilities or infrastructure 5. Machinery and Equipment 6. Training 7. Working capital Advance approval from DEED is necessary if the local government would like to provide financing for activities not listed above. Approval is more likely to occur in projects that relate to business development and involve other local government funds. Ineligible Activities In contrast to federal MIF funds, there are industry limitations on how state MIF RLFs may be used. State MIF RI -Fs may not be used for the operation, construction or expansion of a casino, a sport facility that that has a professional sports team as a principal tenant or any firm engaged in retailing merchandise. All assistance should follow the approved RLF guidelines. Please call your loan officer to discuss any prospective financing. Wage Goals Businesses receiving RLF-State MIF assistance must pay each employee total compensation, including benefits not mandated by law, that on an annualized basis is equal to at least 110 % of the federal poverty level for a family of four, which as of February 1, 2014 is $12.61 per hour. Each year's compensation level changes and can be found on DEED's Business Finance MIF website. Other Eligible Uses of the Funds Minn. Stat. 116.1.8731 allows local governments to loan or grant RLF funds to a regional development commission, other regional entities, or a certain statewide community capital funds to provide the local match required for capitalization of a regional or statewide RLF. Unlike federal MIF funds, state MIF funds held by local governments never lose their state identify and must follow all applicable laws and regulations. 2 July 2014 The local government must request permission from the DEED before it can commit to providing funds to any of these organizations. The local government does not have the authority to turn over to another entity, such as Port Authority, Economic Development Authority, Housing Authority, etc. revolving loan funds for any purpose; these entities may administer MIF transactions provided the MIF grantee still maintains control over the RLF. Conflict of Interest Minn. Stat. 471.87 and 471.88 provide guidance on conflict of interest in a MIF transaction. An actual conflict of interest shall be deemed to exist when a decision on a MIF transaction would compromise a duty to another party or if special advantage is deemed to occur. Potential conflict of interests shouldl also be considered. Business Subsidy Law As mentioned on page 1, Minn. Stat. 116J.993 and 116J.994 must be followed in the administration of RLF-State MIF. These sections pertain to the definition of a business subsidy, public purpose of the subsidy, criteria, subsidy agreements, wage and job goals, timing of the project, public notice and hearing requirements, failure to meet goals, and reporting of information regarding the outcomes of the subsidy. Job Listing Requirements Per Minn. Stat. 116L.66, a business that receives grants or loans in an amount greater than $200,000 must agree to list any vacant or new positions related to the financial assistance on the MinnesotaWorks.net job bank website. Prevailing Wage Per Minn. Stat. 116J.871, laborers and mechanics at the project site during construction, installation, remodeling, and repairs must be paid the state prevailing wage if the financial assistance is greater than $500,000 for a loan. All contracts for publicly owned infrastructure using the RLF must comply with the prevailing wage provisions. Data Privacy The provision of any information related to any applications for assistance is guided by Minn. Stat. 13.591, particularly Subd 1 and 2. These operating guidelines provide a summary of how to administer revolving loan funds seeded with repayments from Minnesota Investment Fund loans. Specific transactions and RLF administration should be discussed with your DEED Senior Loan Officer. Other applicable state and federal laws and rules must also be followed. RELEVANT LINKS: 2017 Minn. Laws 1 Spec. Penalty for Unauthorized Diversion Program. Effective May 31, 2017, a Sess. ch 1, art. 4, § 18 to be codified as Minn. Stat. § city that is determined by a court to be operating a pretrial diversion program 477x,.0175. without statutory authorization under section 169.999 (administrative traffic penalties) or any other law must have its aid reduced. The aid is to be reduced by the amount of fees collected through the program. Taxpayers are explicitly authorized by this new law to seek a declaratory judgment action (or other relief) to determine if the program is unauthorized. Any reduction will take effect following the court's finding against aid payments as early as 2018. League of Minnesota Cities Information Memo: 6/21/2017 Budget Guide for Cities Page 2 The additional day could have financial implications for cities operating municipal liquor stores, and enforcement of the licensing ordinance for one more day a week may in some situations mean added costs. 2017 Minn. Laws ch 26, § 1 National Night Out and Other Community Events. As of May 3, 2017, to be codified as Minn. Stat. 471.198. any city may spend money for National Night Out events held within that § city. Additionally, any city may spend money for any event or purpose that the council determines will foster positive relationships between law enforcement and the community. Cities may by resolution authorize officials and staff to solicit contributions or fundraise for these purposes. 2017 Minn. Laws ch 29, § 1 Awards and Trophies. Prior to now, cities have been limited to spending no amending Minn. Stat. § more than $800 annually on awards and trophies as part of a recreation 415.15, program. As of May 12, 2017, there is no statutory limit on the amount of funds cities may use to pay for awards and trophies. 2017 Minn. Laws 1 st Spec. Government-owned well maintenance fee abolished. Cities have always Sess. ch. 6, art. 10, § 22 been subject to a $50 monitoring fee for unsealed wells. Effective July 1, that amending Minn. Stat. § 1031.208, subd. 2. fee is eliminated for any government-owned wells. 2017 Minn. Laws ch. 94, art. Building permit fees. Building permit fee amounts have been amended 2 § 5 amending Minn. Stat. § 326B.153. slightly. The increases are effective July 1, 2017, but set to expire October 1, 2021. 2017 Minn. Laws ch. 94, art. Electrical utility assessment. Effective July 1, 2017, the maximum amount 8 § 8 amending Minn. Stat. § 216B.62, subd. 3b. the Department of Commerce can assess for performing its duties has been reduced to $500,000 from $1,000,000. The amended subdivision will expire June 30, 2018. 2017 Minn. Laws ch. 94, art. Exception to Minnesota Investment Fund. Effective July 1, 2017, cities 6§24. with uncommitted money received from repayment of funds may choose to give 20% of the funds back to the state general fund before June 30, 2018. The remaining 80% of the uncommitted funds can then be used for any lawful expenditure. 2017 Minn. Laws 1 Spec. Penalty for Unauthorized Diversion Program. Effective May 31, 2017, a Sess. ch 1, art. 4, § 18 to be codified as Minn. Stat. § city that is determined by a court to be operating a pretrial diversion program 477x,.0175. without statutory authorization under section 169.999 (administrative traffic penalties) or any other law must have its aid reduced. The aid is to be reduced by the amount of fees collected through the program. Taxpayers are explicitly authorized by this new law to seek a declaratory judgment action (or other relief) to determine if the program is unauthorized. Any reduction will take effect following the court's finding against aid payments as early as 2018. League of Minnesota Cities Information Memo: 6/21/2017 Budget Guide for Cities Page 2 City Council Agenda: 6/25/2018 2V. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2018-55 approving Decertification of Redevelopment TIF District #1-35 (JT) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The City Council is being asked to consider decertification of existing Redevelopment TIF District #1-35 to allow establishment of a new Affordable Housing TIF District. The creation of a new housing TIF District will support the proposed development of a 47 unit multi- family apartment in the downtown area. The site at the corner of Yd and Locust has been awaiting potential development for approximately 15 years; envisioned first as commercial and more recently - since completion of the downtown plan, as multi -family residential. A new Affordable Housing TIF District which would be based on the full value of the proposed new development and have a potential maximum life of 26 years, similar to a Redevelopment District in length of term. Prior to establishing the new housing district, the existing one needs to be decertified. Barry Fluth, Master's Fifth Avenue, the developer involved in the original Redevelopment proposal is in support of the decertification step at this time. The EDA recently acted to approve decertification of the TIF District at its regular June 13, 2018 meeting. The attached resolution needs City action to proceed with the decertification step. Al. STAFF IMPACT: The proposed Decertification step will not place undue burden on staff beyond normal documentation tasks. If the decertification resolution is approved by the City Council, Northland Securities will assist staff in filing appropriate documents with the County and State of MN. A2. BUDGET IMPACT: There is a minimal impact to the EDA budget from considering decertification of TIF District #1-35. A3. STRATEGIC PLAN IMPACT: In supporting the decertification of TIF District #1- 35, the opportunity is created to consider establishing an Affordable Housing TIF District which will enable the development of housing in the downtown core area as per the adopted Downtown Small Area Plan and the City's Strategic Plan Goals and Objectives. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to adopt Resolution 2018-55 approving decertification of Redevelopment TIF District #1-35. 2. Motion to deny Resolution 2018-55 decertifying Redevelopment TIF District #1-35. 3. Motion to table consideration of Resolution 2018-55 for further research or discussion. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative #1. The decertification of the unworkable Redevelopment TIF District is an important first step to proceed with a development proposal that is viable and can be completed. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Resolution 2018-55 B. Letter from Barry Fluth (Master's Fifth Avenue) CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2018-55 RESOLUTION APPROVING DECERTIFICATION OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 1-35 BE IT RESOLVED By the City Council ("Council") of the City of Monticello, Minnesota (the "City") as follows: Section 1. Recitals. 1.01. The City previously established Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-35 (the "TIF District"), a redevelopment TIF District, within Central Monticello Redevelopment Project No. 1 in the City and approved a Tax Increment Financing Plan ("TIF Plan") for the TIF District. The TIF District is administered by the City of Monticello Economic Development Authority (the "Authority"). 1.02. Pursuant to the terms of the Contract for Private Development between the Authority, as assignee of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Monticello, Minnesota, and Masters Fifth Avenue, Inc. (the "Developer"), dated September 7, 2005, as amended (the "Agreement"), the Authority granted tax increment financing assistance to the Developer in the form of a tax increment revenue note (the "TIF Note") to reimburse the Developer for the purchase price of the Property through tax increments from the TIF District. The Agreement provided that payments of principal and interest on the TIF Note would commence upon receipt by the Authority of tax increment from the Minimum Improvements to be constructed on the Property. 1.03. Despite five amendments extending the required dates of commencement and completion of construction of the Minimum Improvements, the Developer has not commenced construction of the Minimum Improvements as of the date hereof, has notified the Authority that Developer will not construct the Minimum Improvements, and has requested that the parties terminate the Agreement and decertify the TIF District. 1.04. By resolution on June 13, 2018, the Authority approved the decertification of the TIF District subject to ratification by the City, finding that decertification of the TIF District and termination of the Agreement are in the best interest of the Authority and City, because such actions will allow the creation of a new housing tax increment financing district encompassing the Property, thereby increasing workforce rental housing options for City residents. 1.05. The Council ratifies the Authority's findings that decertifying the TIF District is in the best interest of the City, for the reasons stated in Section 1.04. Section 2. TIF District Decertified; Filing. 526909v1 MINI NM190-156 2.01. The City hereby approves decertification of the TIF District. 2.02. The City hereby authorizes Authority staff to transmit a copy of this Resolution to Wright County with instructions to decertify the TIF District as of the date hereof, it being the intent of the City and Authority that any tax increment derived from the TIF District and collected after the date hereof should be redistributed by the County Auditor to the taxing jurisdictions within the TIF District. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Monticello this 25th day of June, 2018. Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk 526909v1 MINI NM190-156 2 Master's Fifth Avenue, Inc. 19577 18 0 th Ave NW Big Lake, MN 55309 763-390-0393 March 27, 2018 TO: Monticello Economic Development Authority City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street Monticello, MN 55362 EDA Members: Thank you for your consideration of the creation of an Affordable Housing TIF District on my property at 213 West 3rd Street in Monticello. I have been working with Pat Briggs on this project and we feel this is the best use of this parcel. We currently have a purchase agreement on this property. We feel this project will be a great addition to Downtown Monticello and will help to initiate growth and development in that area. Thank you again for your nsider ion. Barry Fluth, president Master's Fifth Avenue, Inc. City Council Agenda: 6/25/2018 2W. Consideration of authorizing the purchase of influent bumps for the WWTP from Nelson Electric Motor for $46.558 (ML) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: In 1998 when improvements were made at the Waste Water Treatment Plant (WWTP) which included the installation of a 3 -cell Sequencing Batch Reactor (SBR) revisions to the influent pump station were also made. These revisions included moving the grit and screenings removal systems from in front of the influent pumping station to behind it which has created problems because grit and trash collect on the influent pumps causing increased wear. In 2012 a feasibility report was completed that recommended energy efficiency upgrades, influent wet well improvements, and sludge dewatering. The sludge dewatering project and some of the energy efficiency projects were completed. The current wet well has a capacity of 14,000 gallons which provides an average time of 9 -minutes to make repairs to the pumps to avoid sewer backups. Two of the three influent pumps are in need of replacement it is recommended that we replace these at this time. If the City moves forward with the recommended grit removal and headworks project it is anticipated that these pumps could be utilized in that project. Three quotes were received for these pumps as per the City's purchasing policy. Al. Budget Impact: The low bidder for the pumps was Nelson Electric Motor Repair at $46,558.00 which doesn't include freight. Freight is estimated at $1,000.00. This project would be funded out of the sewage fund. A2. Staff Workload Impact: The pumps will be installed by Veolia the City's manager for the WWTP. Staff time impact will be minimal. A3. Strategic Plan Impact: The completion of the pump replacement is in line with the Strategic Plan goal for "Create & Preserve Sustainable Livability". B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the purchase of two pumps for the Waste Water Treatment Plant from Nelson Electric Motor Repair in the amount of $46,558.00 plus freight. 2. Motion to deny the purchase of pumps for the Waste Water Treatment Plant. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATI ON: • Staff recommends Alternate No. 1 D. ATTACHMENTS: • Quotes NELSON ELECTRIC MOTOR REPAIR 9654 US HWY 12 HOWARD LAKE, MN. 55349 CELL: 320-296-1084 HOME: 320-543-3280 Quote Attention: CHUCK DATE: 05-21-18 ADDRESS: CITY OF MONTICELLO 1 THIS IS THE QUOTE YOU NEEDED FOR PUMP REPLACEMENT AT THE WWTP 6VC500M4-43 50 HP MYERS PUMP 6VCX500M4-43 50 HP EXPLOSION PROOF MYERS PUMP 8VL1000M4-43 100 HP PUMP MYERS 8VLX1000M4-43100 HP EXPLOSION PROOF MYERS PUMP INCOMING FREIGHT NOT INCLUDED Tax Total l $16720.00 $17500.00 $28520.00 $29058.00 Tri-State Pump & Control 20092 21st Avenue East PO Box 7 Clearwater, MN 55320 800-537-2040 Fax: 320-558-2002 tristate@histatepurnp.com zaaw.tristatepam2p.coin Name / Address NELSON ELECTRIC MOTOR REPAIR 9654 US HIGHWAY 12 HOWARD LAKE, MN 55349 11 MISC Thank you! Phone: 320-543-3280 Fax: 320-543-3280 Estimate This Estimate isr Date Estimate Good for 30 Days from the date ofI 5/17/2018 I 133293 Issue N Ship To NELSON ELECTRIC MOTOR 9654 US HIGHWAY 12 HOWARD LAKE, MN 55349 Item Description EBARA PUMP, 150DSC4AOFM46050 150 DSC4 AO FM 4P 50HP EBARA PUMP, 200DSC3 E1052-1760 - 100HP FREIGHT NOT INCLUDED. LEAD TIME 50HP - 4-6 WEEKS ARO. LEAD TIME 100HP - 30-32 WEEKS ARO. Signature Terms Rep Project NET 30 KEVIN Qty U/M Unit Price Total 1 EA 42,081.30 42,081.30 1 EA 81,643.75 81,643.75 Subtotal $123,725.05 Sales Tax (6.875%) $0.00 Total $123,725.05 WWGO - ET SCH 4. 5250 WEST 74TM STREET 5 S C3 I N C7674 COLLEGE ROAD SUITE 105 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55439-2226 BAXTER, MN 56425-7865 952-831-4340/FAX: 952-831-2357 218-829-6890/FAX: 218-829-6972 MAY 17, 2018 CITY OF MONTICELLO WWTP VEOLIA NORTH AMERICA ATTN: CHUCK KEYES SUBJECT: REPLACEMENT PUMPS WE RESPECTFULLY SUBMIT OUR QUOTATION ON THE FOLLOWING HYDROMATIC EQUIPMENT. 1- HYDROMATIC MODEL S8LX EXPLOSION -PROOF SUBMERSIBLE PUMP WITH 100 HP, 1750 RPM, 3/60/460 VOLT MOTOR SIZED FOR THE DESIGN CONDITION OF (3000 GPM @ 90' TDH). YOUR COST F.O.B. FACTORY WITH FREIGHT PREPAID AND ALLOWED TO THE MONTICELLO WWTP $73,919.00 1 - HYDROMATIC MODEL S6AX EXPLOSION -PROOF SUBMERSIBLE PUMP WITH 50 HP, 1750 RPM, 3/60/460 VOLTMOTOR YOUR COST F.O.B. FACTORY WITH FREIGHT PREPAID AND ALLOWED TO THE MONTICELLO WWTP $26,722.00 IF YOU CHOOSE TO PURCHASE BOTH PUMPS, THE PRICE FOR THE 100 HP PUMP CAN BE REDUCED $6103 TO $67,816. AWE HAVE NOT INCLUDED ANY ELECTRICAL WORK, CONTROLS OR ANY OTHER MATERIALS NOT MENTIONED ABOVE. WE HAVE NOT INCLUDED ANY APPLICABLE TAXES. PRICES ARE FIRM FOR 60 DAYS. TERMS ARE NET 30 DAYS AFTER SHIPMENT. SHIPMENT CAN BE MADE 8 - 10 WEEKS AFTER RECEIPT OF YOUR ORDER. YOUR CONSIDERATION AND ORDER WILL BE APPRECIATED. SINCERELY, BRYAN GOEHRING City Council Agenda: 06/25/2018 3A. PUBLIC HEARING - Consideration of adopting Resolution 2018-54 establishing Affordable Housing TIF District #140 (JT) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The City Council is being asked to consider stablishing an Affordable Housing TIF District #1-40 to support development of a 47 -unit apartment complex by Briggs Properties in downtown Monticello. The EDA approved the establishment of TIF District #1-40 at its regular meeting on June 13, 2018. The City Council initially acted to call for the public hearing required to establish a TIF District at its April 9, 2018 meeting. Briggs Properties applied for TIF in order to move forward with the apartment proposal. The proposed site of the TIF District is at the corner of Locust and Third Street. This vacant site has been awaiting potential development for approximately 15 years; envisioned first as commercial and more recently - since completion of the downtown plan, as multi -family residential. TIF funding will support project costs consisting of land acquisition, site preparation, surface and underground parking, utility installation and landscaping. The developer has indicated that without TIF assistance, the project will not proceed. A new Affordable Housing TIF District would be based on the full value of the proposed new development of approximately $7,053,000 +/-and have a potential maximum life of 26 years, similar to a Redevelopment District in length of term. Affordable Housing TIF Districts also have a contractual affordability requirement which in this proposal means there will need to be 10 units made available to households with income of 50 percent or less of the area (County) median. The current income threshold is $47,150. Briggs is proposing a mix of 3 studio units, 19 one bedroom units and 25 two bedroom units. Northland Securities completed a memo/report detailing the financing and the "but for test" which is attached for your review. The TIF Plan, also completed by Northland, is attached and it outlines the proposed project, the TIF budget and use of funds. In addition to the TIF amount of $862,000, generated by the new development to cover the project costs, the EDA, in May, authorized an up -front grant of Available TIF Funds in the amount of $400,000 for underground parking expenses - which is projected to cost $560,000 +/-. A Contract for Private Redevelopment with Briggs detailing the minimum improvements along with funding and performance requirements will be considered by the EDA separately at its meeting on July 11, 2018. Al. STAFF IMPACT: The proposed establishment of TIF District #140 will not affect staff workloads. The ongoing work involved in administering the new District will not place undue burden on staff beyond normal documentation tasks. A2. BUDGET IMPACT: The budget impact associated with TIF Districts is confined to the project. Without the new development there are no new property new taxes and no tax increment which is generated by the new property value. The TIF will only be paid from the new value increment that is collected; not from any other City or EDA funds. The EDA, as the statutory administrative Authority will receive 10 percent of the annual increment to accounting and clerical tasks. Per TIF cash flow projections, this City Council Agenda: 06/25/2018 amounts to roughly $6,000 per year. A3. STRATEGIC PLAN IMPACT: In establishing a new Affordable Housing TIF District, the City will be supporting additional housing development as per the City's 2018 Strategic Goals and Objectives (#1 — "Work to attract and develop a healthy mix of housing options"). It also aligns with the objectives for the downtown core area as noted in the recently adopted Downtown Small Area Plan. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to adopt Resolution 2018-54 approving establishment of an Affordable Housing TIF District # 1-40. 2. Motion to deny Resolution 2018-54 related to establishing a new Affordable Housing TIF District # 1-40. 3. Motion to table consideration of Resolution 2018-54 for further research or discussion. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative #1. The City Strategic Goals emphasize the need to attract and develop a healthy mix of housing options. Downtown housing is another choice for residents. It will also support business establishments in the core of the City as well. The proposed TIF District and related development will also represent a first step in private efforts to implement the recently adopted Small Area Study which identifies the site at Yd and Locust as a multi- family use. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Resolution 2018-54 B. TIF Plan for District #1-40 C. Northland Securities Report D. Color Rendering of Proposed Project E. Sworn Construction Statement F. TIF #140 Calendar G. Public Hearing Notice Affidavit 2 CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2018-54 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 1-40 (BRIGGS) WITHIN CENTRAL MONTICELLO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 1; AND THE ADOPTION OF THE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN RELATING THERETO WHEREAS, the City of Monticello Economic Development Authority (the "EDA") has requested that the City of Monticello, Minnesota (the "City") create Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-40 (the "TIF District") within Central Monticello Redevelopment Project No. 1 (the "Project") and adopt a tax increment financing plan for the TIF District (the "TIF Plan"), pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.090 to 469.1081 and 469.174 to 469.1794, as amended (collectively, the "Act"); and WHEREAS, the City and EDA have investigated the facts relating to the proposed TIF District and have caused the TIF Plan for the TIF District to be prepared; and WHEREAS, the City and its consultants have performed all actions required by law to be performed prior to the creation of the TIF District and the adoption of the Program and TIF Plan relating thereto, including, but not limited to, notification of Wright County and Independent School District No. 882 (Monticello Public Schools), Wright County, Minnesota, having taxing jurisdiction over the property to be included in the TIF District, approval of the TIF Plan by the EDA on June 13, 2018, and the holding of a public hearing upon published and required notice as required by law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Monticello as follows: 1. Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-40. The City hereby approves the establishment of the TIF District within the Project, the boundaries of which are described in Section 2.03.2 and Exhibit V of the TIF Plan. 2. Tax Increment Financing Plan. The TIF Plan is adopted as the tax increment financing plan for the TIF District and is incorporated herein by reference, and the City Council makes the following findings consistent with the TIF Plan: (a) The TIF District is a housing district as defined in Section 469.174, Subd. 11 of the Act, as described in Section 2.03.3 of the TIF Plan. (b) In the opinion of the City Council, the development proposed in connection with establishment of the TIF District would not occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future, and the increased market value of the site that could reasonably be expected to occur without the use of tax increment financing ("TIF Assistance") would be less than the increase in the 526911v1 MNI MN190-156 market value estimated to result from the proposed development after subtracting the present value of the projected tax increments for the maximum duration of the TIF District as described in the TIF Plan. The above finding is based on a request to the City submitted by the Developer, stating that the TIF Assistance is needed from the City and that without the use of tax increment financing, the proposed development could not proceed. The City also finds that due to the extraordinary cost of structured parking and the limitation on rents available to developers of multifamily housing with an affordable component, the City has no expectation that other similar development would occur without TIF Assistance. Therefore, the City reasonably believes that the expected increase in market value at this site without TIF Assistance would be minimal. A comparative analysis of estimated market values both with and without establishment of the TIF District and the use of tax increments has been performed. There has been no economic activity over the past five years within the TIF District, so the City projects a small inflationary rate of 1%. Such analysis, included as Exhibit I to the TIF Plan, indicates that: 1. the increase in estimated market value of the proposed development is $7,053,376; and 2. the present value of expected tax increments collected over the maximum duration of the TIF District is $862,208; and 3. the expected increased estimated market value of the site without the use of tax increment is $177,617; and 4. even if some development other than the proposed development were to occur, the City finds that no alternative would occur that would produce a market value increase greater than $6,052,668 (the amount in number 1 less the amount in number 2). (c) The TIF Plan for the TIF District No. 1-40 conforms to the general plan for development or redevelopment of the City as a whole, because the City's comprehensive plan provides for multifamily residential housing as identified within the Small Area Plan. (d) The TIF Plan will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole, for the development or redevelopment of the TIF District by private enterprise. Through the implementation of the TIF Plan, the City will provide an impetus for construction of multifamily housing by a private developer on currently underdeveloped land, thereby increasing housing options in the City and encouraging potential further development of the surrounding properties by other private developers within the Project. 3. Public Puraose. The adoption of the TIF Plan conforms in all respects to the requirements of the Act and will help fulfill a need to redevelop an area of the City which is already built up, to provide increased housing options to City residents, to 526911v1 MNI MN190-156 improve the tax base, and to improve the general economy of the State, and thereby serves a public purpose. 4. Certification. City and EDA staff and consultants are authorized and directed to proceed with implementation of the TIF Plan and to transmit the request for certification of the TIF District to the Wright County Auditor in such form and content as the County Auditor may specify, together with a list of all properties within Tax Increment District No. 1-40 for which building permits have been issued during the 18 months immediately preceding the adoption of this Resolution. The Wright County Auditor is requested to certify the original net tax capacity of the TIF District as described in the TIF Plan, and to certify in each year thereafter the amount by which the original net tax capacity has increased or decreased in accordance with the Act. 5. Filing. The City Administrator is authorized and directed to file copies of the Program and TIF Plan with the Commissioner of Revenue and Office of the State Auditor. Approved by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota on June 25, 2018. Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk 526911v1 MNI MN190-156 111 plfi CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING (HOUSING) DISTRICT NO. 1-40 (BRIGGS) WITHIN CENTRAL MONTICELLO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 1 ADOPTED BY CITY OF MONTICELLO AND CITY OF MONTICELLO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (EDA) PUBLIC HEARING DATE: JUNE 25, 2018 PLAN APPROVED BY EDA DATE: PLAN APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL DATE: PLAN CERTIFICATION REQUEST DATE: PLAN CERTIFIED DATE: NORTHLAND '`4 r4 PUBLIC FINANCE Northland Securities, Inc. 150 South Fifth Street, Suite 3300 Minneapolis, MN 55402 (800)851-2920 Member NASD and SIPC Registered with SEC and MSRB TABLE OF CONTENTS ARTICLE I - INTRODUCTION AND DEFINITIONS.........................................................1 Section 1.01 Introduction......................................................................................1 Section 1.02 Definitions.........................................................................................1 Section 1.03 Plan Preparation...............................................................................1 ARTICLE II - TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN.........................................................2 Section 2.01 Statutory Authority..........................................................................2 Section 2.02 Planned Development.....................................................................2 2.02.1 Project Description......................................................................................3 2.02.2 City Plans and Development Program .................................................... 3 2.02.3 Land Acquisition.........................................................................................3 2.02.4 Development Activities..............................................................................2 2.02.5 Need for Tax Increment Financing........................................................... 2 Section 2.03 Tax Increment Financing District...................................................3 2.03.1 Designation.................................................................................................. 3 2.03.2 Boundaries of TIF District..........................................................................3 2.03.3 Type of District............................................................................................3 Section 2.04 Plan for Use of Tax Increment........................................................3 2.04.1 Estimated Tax Increment............................................................................3 2.04.2 Project Costs.................................................................................................4 2.04.3 Estimated Sources and Uses of Funds.....................................................5 Figure2-1......................................................................................................5 2.04.4 Administrative Expense.............................................................................5 2.04.5 County Road Costs.....................................................................................6 2.04.6 Bonded Indebtedness................................................................................. 6 2.04.7 Duration of TIF District..............................................................................6 2.04.8 Estimated Impact on Other Taxing Jurisdictions...................................6 2.04.9 Prior Planned Improvements.................................................................... 7 ARTICLE III -ADMINISTERING THE TIF DISTRICT......................................................7 Section 3.01 Filing and Certification....................................................................7 Section 3.02 Modifications of the Tax Increment Financing Plan....................7 Section 3.03 4 -Year Knockdown Rule..................................................................8 Section 3.04 Pooling/5-Year Rule..........................................................................8 Section 3.05 Financial Reporting and Disclosure Requirements .....................8 Section 3.06 Business Subsidy Compliance........................................................8 EXHIBITS........................................................................................................................... 9 Exhibit I - Present Value Analysis............................................................................9 Exhibit II - Projected Tax Increment......................................................................10 Exhibit III - Impact on Other Taxing Jurisdictions..............................................11 Exhibit IV - Estimated Tax Increment Over Life of District...............................12 Exhibit V - Map of TIF District...............................................................................13 Exhibit VI - Map of Central Monticallo Redevelopment Project No. 1 ............14 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING (HOUSING) DISTRICT NO. 1-40 ARTICLE I — INTRODUCTION AND DEFINITIONS SECTION 1.01 INTRODUCTION The City of Monticello and the City of Monticello Economic Development Authority propose to provide tax increment financing assistance through the establishment of Tax Increment Financing (Housing) District No. 1-40 to assist with the financing of certain project costs for the construction of an approximate 47 -unit rental housing facility, with an affordable component, by a private developer. This document contains the plan for achieving the objectives of the Central Monticello Redevelopment Project No. 1 through the establishment of Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-40. SECTION 1.02 DEFINITIONS For the purposes of this document, the terms below have the meanings given in this section, unless the context in which they are used indicates a different meaning: 1. "Authority" means the City of Monticello Economic Development Authority. 2. "City" means the City of Monticello, Minnesota. 3. "City Council" means the City Council of the City. 4. "County" means Wright County, Minnesota. 5. "Developer" means the private party undertaking construction within the TIF District. 6. "Project Costs" means the cost of qualified development activities that will occur within the TIF District that may be paid from tax increment revenue. 7. "Redevelopment Plan" means the Redevelopment Plan for the Redevelopment Project, as the same may, from time to time, be amended or supplemented. 8. "Redevelopment Project" means Central Monticello Redevelopment Project No. 1 of the Authority, as the same may, from time to time, be amended or supplemented. 9. "School District" means Independent School District No. 882 (Monticello Public Schools). 10. "State" means the State of Minnesota. 11. "TIF Act" means Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.174 through 469.1794, as amended, both inclusive. 12. "TIF District" means Tax Increment Financing (Housing) District No. 1-40 (Briggs). 13. "TIF Plan" means the tax increment financing plan for the TIF District (this document). SECTION 1.03 PLAN PREPARATION The document was prepared for the City and the Authority by Northland Securities, Inc. DRAFT TIF PLAN FOR PUBLIC HEARING, JUNE 25, 2018 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING (HOUSING) DISTRICT NO. 1-40 ARTICLE II - TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN SECTION 2.01 STATUTORY AUTHORITY The TIF District and the TIF Plan are established under the authority of the TIF Act. SECTION 2.02 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 2.02.1 Project Description The Developer proposes to build an approximate 47 -unit rental housing facility, with an affordable component, located at the corner of Locust and 3rd Street West within the City. The proposal calls for a four-story apartment building to include approximately 3 studio units, 25 one -bedroom units, and 19 two-bedroom units. The property where the housing will be built is currently vacant. 2.02.2 City Plans and Development Program In addition to achieving the objectives of the Redevelopment Plan, the proposed development is consistent with and works to achieve the development objectives of the City. The TIF Plan for the TIF District conforms to the general plan for development or redevelopment of the City as a whole. The City has adopted land use controls to guide the use of property. The proposed development plans for the project in the TIF District have been reviewed by the Planning Commission and the City Council. 2.02.3 Land Acquisition The City or the Authority do not plan to acquire any property within the TIF District. 2.02.4 Development Activities As of the date of approval of this TIF Plan, there are no development activities proposed in this TIF Plan that are subject to contracts. 2.02.5 Need for Tax Increment Financing In various materials the Developer has demonstrated that the proposed use of tax increment financing is needed to offset the high construction costs of high-quality low- to moderate - income housing and associated infrastructure required to support the facility. Without the proposed assistance, these initial up -front costs would make it infeasible for the Developer to be able to charge the affordable rents required for low -to moderate -income residents. Thus, it is the opinion of the City and the Authority that the proposed development would not reasonably be expected to occur solely through private investment within the foreseeable future and that the increased market value of the site that could reasonably be expected to occur without the use of tax increment financing would be less than the increase in the market value estimated to result from the proposed development after subtracting the present value of the projected tax increments for the maximum duration of the TIF District permitted by the TIF Plan. A comparative analysis of estimated market values both with and without establishment of the TIF District and the use of tax increments has been performed as described above and is shown in Exhibit I. This analysis, which is not required by the TIF Act for approval of a housing district, indicates that the increase in estimated market value of the proposed development (less the present value of the projected tax increments for the maximum duration permitted by the TIF Plan) exceeds the estimated market value of the site prior to the establishment of the TIF District. DRAFT TIF PLAN FOR PUBLIC HEARING, JUNE 25, 2018 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING (HOUSING) DISTRICT NO. 1-40 SECTION 2.03 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT 2.03.1 Designation This TIF District is designated Tax Increment Financing (Housing) District No. 1-40 (Briggs). 2.03.2 Boundaries of TIF District The boundaries of the TIF District are depicted in Exhibit V. The TIF District includes parcel number 155010036030 and the adjacent roads and right-of-way. The parcel is legally described as follows: Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 36, Plat of Monticello, Wright County, Minnesota. 2.03.3 Type of District The TIF District is designated as a "housing" district pursuant to Section 469.174, Subd. 11 of the TIF Act. For the designation, of a tax increment financing housing district, the Developer of the Project will need to commit to the following: 1. Satisfy the income requirements for a qualified residential rental project as defined in section 142(d) of the Internal Revenue Code. This requirement applies for the duration of the tax increment financing district. The Fiscal Year 2018 Area Median Income for the County is $94,300. The developer will commit to provide (a) 20% or more of units for occupancy by persons at 50% or less of area median gross income (estimated at $47,150) or (b) (a) 40% or more of units for occupancy by persons at 60% or less of area median gross income (estimated at $56,580). These income thresholds may change over the life of the TIF District. 2. Provide that no more than 20% of the square footage of building to receive assistance from tax increments consist of commercial, retail, or other nonresidential uses. Revenue derived from tax increment from a housing district must be used solely to finance the cost of housing projects as defined in Section 469.174, subdivision 11 of the TIF Act. The cost of public improvements directly related to the housing projects and the allocated administrative expenses of the Authority may be included in the cost of a housing project. 3. Failure to comply with these income limitations is subject to the enforcement provisions of Section 469.1771 of the TIF Act. SECTION 2.04 PLAN FOR USE OF TAX INCREMENT 2.04.1 Estimated Tax Increment The original net tax capacity of value of the TIF District will be set by the County upon request for certification. For the purposes of this Plan, the estimated original net tax capacity is $1,731. This amount is estimated based on the most recent published estimated market value of $138,500 for Parcel 155010036030; with tax capacity value calculated for residential rental property. The total tax capacity value of the property after development completion (for taxes payable in 2021) is estimated to be $69,438. This amount is based on a total estimated market value of $5,555,000 with property classified as residential rental property. The estimated difference between the total tax capacity value after development completion (for taxes payable in 2021) and the original net tax capacity value is the captured tax capacity value ($67,706) for the creation of tax increment. The total local tax rate for taxes payable in 2018 is 88.994%. The TIF Plan assumes that this rate will be set as the original local tax rate for the TIF District. At the time of the certification of the original net tax capacity for the TIF District, the county auditor shall certify the original local tax rate that applies to the TIF District. The original local tax rate is the sum of all the local tax rates, excluding that portion of the school rate attributable to the general education levy under Minnesota Statutes section 126C.13, that apply to a property in the TIF District. The local DRAFT TIF PLAN FOR PUBLIC HEARING, JUNE 25, 2018 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING (HOUSING) DISTRICT NO. 1-40 tax rate to be certified is the rate in effect for the same taxes payable year applicable to the tax capacity values certified as the TIF District's original tax capacity. The resulting tax capacity rate is the original local tax rate for the life of the TIF District. Under these assumptions, the estimated annual tax increment will be $60,255 after development completion. The actual tax increment will vary according to the certified original tax capacity value and original tax rate, the actual property value produced by the proposed development and the changes in property value and State tax policy over the life of the district. It is the intent of the City and the Authority to retain 100% of the captured tax capacity value for the duration of the TIF district. Exhibit II contains the projected tax increment over the life of the District. 2.04.2 Project Costs The Authority will use tax increment to pay Project Costs. The Authority anticipates the use of tax increment to pay administrative expenses for the TIF District and to reimburse the Developer on a pay -go basis for certain Project Costs to provide the affordable housing. A contract between the Authority and the Developer will define the means for verifying Developer costs eligible for reimbursement and the means of disbursing tax increments collected by the Authority to the Developer. The Authority may also use tax increments to pay financing costs. The interest rate payable on bonds, the definition of bonds includes tax increment financing revenue notes, to be issued will be set pursuant to a contract with the Developer. The Authority reserves the right to use any other legally available revenues to finance or pay for Project Costs associated with the development in the TIF District. The City and the Authority reserve the right to modify the TIF Plan to provide authority to expend tax increment from the TIF District on other housing projects that meet the criteria for establishing a housing TIF district. Section 469.174, Subd. 11 of the TIF Act defines a housing districts consisting of a project, or a portion of a project, intended for occupancy, in part, by persons or families of low and moderate income. The requirements for the establishment of a housing TIF district are contained in Section 469.1761 of the TIF Act. The primary criteria are income related. The criteria are different for owned and rental housing. The practical application of this authority includes: • The use of tax increment is not limited by pooling restrictions or the five-year rule. • The tax increment can be spent on activities outside of the TIF district, but within the Development District No. 1. • This authority does not extend the maximum statutory duration of the TIF district. • The tax increment must be used solely to finance the cost of the "housing project" as defined by the TIF Act. The cost of public improvements directly related to the housing project and the allocated administrative expenses of the Authority may be included in the cost of the housing project. • No more than 20% of the square footage of buildings that receive TIF assistance may consist of commercial, retail, or other nonresidential uses. Potential applications of this authority include: • Individual housing projects avoiding the need for a new TIF district. • Supplementing the revenues of another housing TIF district. • Assistance for the renovation of existing housing. • Acquisition of land for housing. DRAFT TIF PLAN FOR PUBLIC HEARING, JUNE 25, 2018 4 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING (HOUSING) DISTRICT NO. 1-40 • Assistance to make public improvements more affordable. 2.04.3 Estimated Sources and Uses of Funds The estimated sources of revenue, along with the estimated Project Costs of the TIF District, are itemized in Figure 2-1 that follows. Such costs are eligible for reimbursement from tax increments, and other listed sources of revenue from the TIF District. The City and Authority reserve the right to administratively adjust the amount of any of the Project Cost items listed in Figure 2-1, so long as the total estimated tax increment project costs amount, not including financing costs, is not increased. FIGURE 2-1 ESTIMATED SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS Total Estimated Tax Increment Revenues Tax increment revenues distributed from the county $1,729,164 Interest and investment earnings $10,000 Sales/lease proceeds $0 Market value homestead credit $0 Total Estimated Tax Increment Revenues $1,739,164 Estimated Project/Financing Costs (to be paid or financed with tax increment) Project costs Land/building acquisition $500,000 Site improvements/preparation costs $0 Utilities $0 Other qualifying improvements $362,000 Construction of affordable housing $0 Small city authorized costs, if not already included above $0 Administrative costs $172,916 Estimated Tax Increment Project Costs $1,034,916 Estimated financing costs Interest expense $704,247 Total Estimated Project/Financing Costs to be Paid from Tax Increment $1,739,164 Estimated Financing Total amount of bonds to be issued $1,034,916 2.04.4 Administrative Expense The Authority reserves the right to retain up to ten percent (10%) of annual tax increment revenues, in addition to any required fees paid to the State and County. The Authority will use these monies to pay for and reimburse the Authority for costs of administering the TIF district allowed by the TIF Act. The estimated amount of tax increment revenue planned to pay administrative expense is shown in Figure 2-1. Anticipated administrative expenses of the TIF District include annual audit of the fund for TIF District, preparation of annual reporting, legal publication of annual report, and administration of the development agreement. DRAFT TIF PLAN FOR PUBLIC HEARING, JUNE 25, 2018 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING (HOUSING) DISTRICT NO. 1-40 2.04.5 County Road Costs The proposed development will not substantially increase the use of county roads and necessitate the need to use tax increments to pay for county road improvements. 2.04.6 Bonded Indebtedness The total amount of bonds estimated to be issued is shown in Figure 2-1. The City will not issue any general obligation bonded indebtedness as a result of the TIF Plan. The Authority intends to use tax increment financing to reimburse the developer on pay-as-you- go basis for Project Costs pursuant to a contract with the Developer. The City or the Authority may advance or loan money to finance expenditures under Section 469.176, subdivision 4 of the TIF Act, from the general funds of the City or the Authority or any other fund under which there is legal authority to do so, subject to the following provisions: (a) Not later than 60 days after money is transferred, advanced, or spent, whichever is earliest, the loan or advance must be authorized by resolution of the City or of the Authority, whichever has jurisdiction over the fund from which the advance or loan is authorized. (b) The resolution may generally grant to the City or the Authority the power to make interfund loans under one or more tax increment financing plans or for one or more districts. The resolution may be adopted before or after the adoption of the tax increment financing plan or the creation of the tax increment financing district from which the advance or loan is to be repaid. (c) The terms and conditions for repayment of the loan must be provided in writing. The written terms and conditions may be in any form, but must include, at a minimum, the principal amount, the interest rate, and maximum term. Written terms may be modified or amended in writing by the City or the Authority before the latest decertification of any tax increment financing district from which the interfund loan is to be repaid. The maximum rate of interest permitted to be charged is limited to the greater of the rates specified under Minnesota Satatutes, Section 270C.40 or 549.09 as of the date the loan or advance is authorized, unless the written agreement states that the maximum interest rate will fluctuate as the interest rates specified under Minnesota Statutes, Section 270C.40 or 549.09 are from time to time adjusted. Loans or advances may be structured as draw- down or line -of -credit obligations of the lending fund. (d) The Authority shall report in the annual report submitted under Section 469.175, subdivision 6 of the TIF Act: (1) the amount of any interfund loan or advance made in a calendar year; and (2) any amendment of an interfund loan or advance made in a calendar year. 2.04.7 Duration of TIF District The duration to collect and spend tax increments on eligible purposes is set at the maximum duration of 25 years after the date of receipt of the first tax increment or 26 years of tax increment collection. The estimated decertification date is 12/31/2045. 2.04.8 Estimated Impact on Other Taxing Jurisdictions Exhibits III and IV show the estimated impact on other taxing jurisdictions if the maximum projected retained captured net tax capacity of the TIF District was hypothetically available to the other taxing jurisdictions. The City and the Authority believe that there will be no adverse impact on other taxing jurisdictions during the life of the TIF District, since the proposed development would not have occurred without the establishment of the TIF District and the provision of public assistance. A positive impact on other taxing jurisdictions will occur when the TIF District is decertified and the development therein becomes part of the general tax base. DRAFT TIF PLAN FOR PUBLIC HEARING, JUNE 25, 2018 6 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING (HOUSING) DISTRICT NO. 1-40 The City and the Authority anticipate minimal impact of the proposed development on city - provided services. There will be no borrowing costs to the City or the Authority for the Project. A manageable increase in water and sewer usage is expected. It is anticipated that there may be a slight but manageable increase in police and fire protection duties due to the development. 2.04.9 Prior Planned Improvements There have been no building permits issued in the last 18 months in conjunction with any of the properties within the TIF District. The Authority will include this statement with the request for certification to the County Auditor. ARTICLE III — ADMINISTERING THE TIF DISTRICT SECTION 3.01 FILING AND CERTIFICATION The filing and certification of the TIF Plan consists of the following steps: 1. Upon adoption of the TIF Plan by the City and the Authority, the Authority shall submit a copy of the TIF Plan to the Minnesota Department of Revenue and the Office of the State Auditor. 2. The Authority shall request that the County Auditor certify the original net tax capacity and net tax capacity rate of the TIF District. To assist the County Auditor in this process, the Authority shall submit copies of the TIF Plan, the resolution establishing the TIF District and adopting the TIF Plan, and a listing of any prior planned improvements. SECTION 3.02 MODIFICATIONS OF THE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN The City and the Authority reserve the right to modify the TIF District and the TIF Plan. Under the TIF Act, the following actions can only be approved after satisfying all the necessary requirements for approval of the original TIF Plan (including notifications and public hearing): ■ Reduction or enlargement in the geographic area of the Development District or the TIF District. ■ Increase in the amount of bonded indebtedness to be incurred. ■ Increase in the amount of capitalized interest. ■ Increase in that portion of the captured net tax capacity to be retained by the Authority. ■ Increase in the total estimated Project Costs, not including cost of financing. ■ Designation of additional property to be acquired by the City or the Authority. Other modifications can be made by resolution of the Authority. In addition, the original approval process does not apply if (1) the only modification is elimination of parcels from the TIF District and (2) the current net tax capacity of the parcels eliminated equals or exceeds the net tax capacity of those parcels in the TIF District's original net tax capacity, or the City and the Authority agree that the TIF District's original net tax capacity will be reduced by no more than the current net tax capacity of the parcels eliminated. Upon approval by the City, the Authority must notify the County Auditor of any modification that reduces or enlarges the geographic area of the TIF District. The geographic area of the TIF District may be reduced but not enlarged after five years following the date of certification. DRAFT TIF PLAN FOR PUBLIC HEARING, JUNE 25, 2018 7 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING (HOUSING) DISTRICT NO. 1-40 SECTION 3.03 4 -YEAR KNOCKDOWN RULE Since the TIF District consists of a single parcel, development of the project as planned prevents any loss of value from the 4 -Year Knockdown Rule. The 4 -Year Knockdown Rule requires that if after four years from certification of the TIF District no demolition, rehabilitation, renovation or site improvement, including a qualified improvement of an adjacent street, has commenced on a parcel located within the TIF District, then that parcel shall be excluded from the TIF District and the original net tax capacity shall be adjusted accordingly. Qualified improvements of a street are limited to construction or opening of a new street, relocation of a street, or substantial reconstruction or rebuilding of an existing street. The Authority must submit to the County Auditor, by February 1 of the fifth year, evidence that the required activity has taken place for each parcel in the TIF District. If a parcel is excluded from the TIF District and the City, Authority, or owner of the parcel subsequently commences any of the above activities, the Authority shall certify to the County Auditor that such activity has commenced and the parcel shall once again be included in the TIF District. The County Auditor shall certify the net tax capacity of the parcel, as most recently certified by the Commissioner of Revenue, and add such amount to the original net tax capacity of the TIF District. SECTION 3.04 POOLING/5-YEAR RULE As permitted under Section 469.1763, subdivision 2(b) and subdivision 3(a)(5) of the TIF Act, any expenditures of increment from the TIF District to pay the cost of a "housing project" as defined in Section 469.174, subd. 11 of the TIF Act will be treated as an expenditure within the district for the purposes of the "pooling rules" and the "five year rule". It is not anticipated that tax increments will be spent outside the TIF District (except allowable administrative expenses), but such expenditures are expressly authorized in the TIF Plan. SECTION 3.05 FINANCIAL REPORTING AND DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS The Authority will comply with the annual reporting requirements of State Law pursuant to the guidelines of the Office of the State Auditor. Under current law, the Authority must prepare and submit a report on the TIF district on or before August 1 of each year. The Authority must also annually publish in a newspaper of general circulation in the City an annual statement for each tax increment financing district. The reporting and disclosure requirements outlined in this section begin with the year the district was certified, and shall end in the year in which both the district has been decertified and all tax increments have been spent or returned to the county for redistribution. Failure to meet these requirements, as determined by the State Auditors Office, may result in suspension of distribution of tax increment. SECTION 3.06 BUSINESS SUBSIDY COMPLIANCE The Project is exempt from the business subsidies requirements specified in Minnesota Statutes, Sections 116J.993 to 116J.995 because the intended assistance for the Project specified in this document is anticipated to be 100% for housing assistance. DRAFT TIF PLAN FOR PUBLIC HEARING, JUNE 25, 2018 8 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING (HOUSING) DISTRICT NO. 1-40 Exhibit I Monticello Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-40 Present Value Analysis As Required By Statute Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175(3)(2) Briggs 1 Estimated Future Market Value w/ Tax Increment Financing 7,053,376 1 2 Payable 2018 Market Value 138,500 3 Market Value Increase (1-2) 6,914,876 4 Present Value of Future Tax Increments 862,208 5 Market Value Increase Less PV of Tax Increments 6,052,668 6 Estimated Future Market Value w/o Tax Increment Financing 177,617 1 7 Payable 2018 Market Value 138,500 8 Market Value Increase (6-7) 39,117 9 Increase in MV From TIF 6,013,551 2 1 Assume 1.00% annual appreciation over 26 year life of district. 2 Statutory compliance achieved if increase in market value from TIF (Line 9) is greater than or equal to zero. DRAFT TIF PLAN FOR PUBLIC HEARING, JUNE 25, 2018 9 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING (HOUSING) DISTRICT NO. 1-40 Exhibit II City of Monticello Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-40 (Housing) Briggs Projected Tax Increment Cash Flow 6 TIF Taxes Taxable Base Tax Captured Assumed Tax Less Tax Present District Value Payable Market New Tax Capacity Tax Original Increment State Increment Value TIF Year Year Year Value' 1 Capacity 3 Capacity Tax Rate 4 (TIF) Fee (TIF) After After Fee 5 (0.36%) Fee 4.00% 1 2019 2020 2,750,000 34,375 (1,731) 32,644 88.994% 29,051 (105) 28,946 26,920 2 2020 2021 5,555,000 69,438 (1,731) 67,706 88.994% 60,255 (217) 60,038 80,588 3 2021 2022 5,610,550 70,132 (1,731) 68,401 88.994% 60,872 (219) 60,653 132,700 4 2022 2023 5,666,656 70,833 (1,731) 69,102 88.994% 61,497 (221) 61,276 183,303 5 2023 2024 5,723,322 71,542 (1,731) 69,810 88.994% 62,127 (224) 61,903 232,439 6 2024 2025 5,780,555 72,257 (1,731) 70,526 88.994% 62,764 (226) 62,538 280,151 7 2025 2026 5,838,361 72,980 (1,731) 71,248 88.994% 63,407 (228) 63,179 326,481 8 2026 2027 5,896,744 73,709 (1,731) 71,978 88.994% 64,056 (231) 63,825 371,467 9 2027 2028 5,955,712 74,446 (1,731) 72,715 88.994% 64,712 (233) 64,479 415,149 10 2028 2029 6,015,269 75,191 (1,731) 73,460 88.994% 65,375 (235) 65,140 457,565 11 2029 2030 6,075,422 75,943 (1,731) 74,212 88.994% 66,044 (238) 65,806 498,751 12 2030 2031 6,136,176 76,702 (1,731) 74,971 88.994% 66,720 (240) 66,480 538,743 13 2031 2032 6,197,538 77,469 (1,731) 75,738 88.994% 67,402 (243) 67,159 577,575 14 2032 2033 6,259,513 78,244 (1,731) 76,513 88.994% 68,092 (245) 67,847 615,281 15 2033 2034 6,322,108 79,026 (1,731) 77,295 88.994% 68,788 (248) 68,540 651,894 16 2034 2035 6,385,329 79,817 (1,731) 78,085 88.994% 69,491 (250) 69,241 687,444 17 2035 2036 6,449,183 80,615 (1,731) 78,884 88.994% 70,202 (253) 69,949 721,964 18 2036 2037 6,513,674 81,421 (1,731) 79,690 88.994% 70,919 (255) 70,664 755,482 19 2037 2038 6,578,811 82,235 (1,731) 80,504 88.994% 71,644 (258) 71,386 788,027 20 2038 2039 6,644,599 83,057 (1,731) 81,326 88.994% 72,375 (261) 72,114 819,628 21 2039 2040 6,711,045 83,888 (1,731) 82,157 88.994% 73,115 (263) 72,852 850,313 22 2040 2041 6,778,156 84,727 (1,731) 82,996 88.994% 73,861 (266) 73,595 880,107 23 2041 2042 6,845,937 85,574 (1,731) 83,843 88.994% 74,615 (269) 74,346 909,036 24 2042 2043 6,914,397 86,430 (1,731) 84,699 88.994% 75,377 (271) 75,106 937,127 25 2043 2044 6,983,541 87,294 (1,731) 85,563 88.994% 76,146 (274) 75,872 964,401 26 2044 2045 7,053,376 88,167 (1,731) 86,436 88.994% 76,923 (277) 76,646 990,884 TOTAL = 1,735,830 (6,249) 1,729,581 Ke_v Asssumotions 1 Taxable market value (TMV) annual growth assumption = 1.00%. 2 Taxable Market Value = 47 units at $117,021 per unit. 3 Base Tax Capacity calcluated on base taxable market value = $138,500 PID: 155010036030 4 Assume Pay 2018 Tax Year. 5 Present value based on semi-annual payments, and indicated rate above, and beginning on date of 1/1/2019. 6 All figures are estimated. DRAFT TIF PLAN FOR PUBLIC HEARING, JUNE 25, 2018 10 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING (HOUSING) DISTRICT NO. 1-40 Exhibit III Monticello Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-40 Impact on Other Taxing Jurisdictions (Taxes Payable 2018) Briggs ANNUAL TAX INCREMENT Estimated Annual Captured Tax Capacity (Full Development) $86,436 Payable 2018 Local Tax Rate 88.994% Estimated Annual Tax Increment $76,923 Percent of Tax Base Net Tax Captured Capacity Tax (NTC) Capacity City of Monticello 29,528,145 86,436 Wright County 156,632,990 86,436 ISD 882 38,892,767 86,436 City of Monticello Wright County ISD 882 Other Totals Dollar Impact of Affected Taxing Jurisdictions Percent of Total NTC 0.29% 0.06% 0.22% Net Tax Tax Added Capacity % of Total Increment Local Tax (NTC) Share Rate 32.333% 36.332% 27,947 0.095% 39.946% 44.886% 34,528 0.022% 15.621% 17.553% 13,502 0.035% 1.094% 1.229% 946 88.994% 100.000% 76,923 NOTE NO. 1: Assuming that ALL of the captured tax capacity would be available to all taxing jurisdictions even if the City does not create the Tax Increment District the creation of the District will reduce tax capacities and increase the local tax rate as illustrated in the above tables. NOTE NO. 2: Assuming that NONE of the captured tax capacity would be available to the taxing jurisdiction if the City did not create the Tax Increment District, then the plan has virtually no initial effect on the tax capacities of the taxing jurisdictions. However, once the District is established, allowable costs paid from the increments, and the District is terminated, all taxing jurisdictions will experience an increase in their tax base. DRAFT TIF PLAN FOR PUBLIC HEARING, JUNE 25, 2018 11 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING (HOUSING) DISTRICT NO. 1-40 Exhibit IV City of Monticello Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-40 (1-40) Briggs Estimated Tax Increments Over Maximum Life of District DRAFT TIF PLAN FOR PUBLIC HEARING, JUNE 25, 2018 12 Based on Pay 2018 Tax Rate = 88.994% 32.333% 39.946% 15.621% 1.094% New Estimated City County School Other TIF Taxes Taxable New Base Captured Total TIF TIF TIF TIF District Payable Market Tax Tax Tax Tax Related Related Related Related Year Year Value Capacity Capacity Capacity Increment Share Share Share Share 1 2020 2,750,000 34,375 (1,731) 32,644 29,051 10,555 13,040 5,099 357 2 2021 5,555,000 69,438 (1,731) 67,706 60,255 21,891 27,046 10,576 742 3 2022 5,610,550 70,132 (1,731) 68,401 60,872 22,116 27,323 10,685 748 4 2023 5,666,656 70,833 (1,731) 69,102 61,497 22,343 27,603 10,794 757 5 2024 5,723,322 71,542 (1,731) 69,810 62,127 22,572 27,886 10,905 764 6 2025 5,780,555 72,257 (1,731) 70,526 62,764 22,803 28,172 11,017 772 7 2026 5,838,361 72,980 (1,731) 71,248 63,407 23,037 28,461 11,130 779 8 2027 5,896,744 73,709 (1,731) 71,978 64,056 23,273 28,752 11,244 787 9 2028 5,955,712 74,446 (1,731) 72,715 64,712 23,511 29,047 11,359 795 10 2029 6,015,269 75,191 (1,731) 73,460 65,375 23,752 29,344 11,475 804 11 2030 6,075,422 75,943 (1,731) 74,212 66,044 23,995 29,645 11,593 811 12 2031 6,136,176 76,702 (1,731) 74,971 66,720 24,240 29,948 11,711 821 13 2032 6,197,538 77,469 (1,731) 75,738 67,402 24,488 30,254 11,831 829 14 2033 6,259,513 78,244 (1,731) 76,513 68,092 24,739 30,564 11,952 837 15 2034 6,322,108 79,026 (1,731) 77,295 68,788 24,992 30,876 12,074 846 16 2035 6,385,329 79,817 (1,731) 78,085 69,491 25,247 31,192 12,198 854 17 2036 6,449,183 80,615 (1,731) 78,884 70,202 25,505 31,511 12,322 864 18 2037 6,513,674 81,421 (1,731) 79,690 70,919 25,766 31,833 12,448 872 19 2038 6,578,811 82,235 (1,731) 80,504 71,644 26,029 32,158 12,576 881 20 2039 6,644,599 83,057 (1,731) 81,326 72,375 26,295 32,487 12,704 889 21 2040 6,711,045 83,888 (1,731) 82,157 73,115 26,564 32,818 12,834 899 22 2041 6,778,156 84,727 (1,731) 82,996 73,861 26,835 33,153 12,965 908 23 2042 6,845,937 85,574 (1,731) 83,843 74,615 27,109 33,492 13,097 917 24 2043 6,914,397 86,430 (1,731) 84,699 75,377 27,386 33,834 13,231 926 25 2044 6,983,541 87,294 (1,731) 85,563 76,146 27,665 34,179 13,366 936 26 2045 7,053,376 88,167 (1,731) 86,436 76,923 27,947 34,528 13,502 946 Total 1,735,830 630,655 779,146 304,688 21,341 DRAFT TIF PLAN FOR PUBLIC HEARING, JUNE 25, 2018 12 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING (HOUSING) DISTRICT NO. 1-40 EXHIBIT V Boundaries of Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-40 Inclusive of Parcel 155-010-036030 and the adjacent roads and right of way Parcel is legally described as follows: Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 36, Plat of Monticello, Wright County, Minnesota. DRAFT TIF PLAN FOR PUBLIC HEARING, JUNE 25, 2018 13 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING (HOUSING) DISTRICT NO. 1-40 EXHIBIT VI Boundaries of Central Monticello Redevelopment Project No. 1 n rn 0 n r� � o 0 rb 2. 0 T n c O M 0 a CA z � 0 ro' n rr A fV DRAFT TIF PLAN FOR PUBLIC HEARING, JUNE 2S, 2018 14 '010!., NORTHLAND PUBLIC FINANCE :1 I1:11:1 I :1 I :11:1 I ®® City of Monticello ®® ® Tammy Omdal ® ® June 6, 2018 ®® Evaluation of Public Financial Assistance for Affordable Housing Project The City of Monticello (the "City") and the City of Monticello Economic Development Authority (the "EDA") received an application from the Briggs Companies (the "Redeveloper") for public financial assistance to assist with the redevelopment and financing of certain project costs for the construction of an approximate 47 -unit rental housing facility, with an affordable component, along with 36 stalls of underground parking (the "Project"). The proposed development is located at the corner of 3rd and Locust on the site that is currently owned by Masters Fifth Avenue. The site has been awaiting redevelopment for approximately fifteen years; envisioned first as commercial and more recently, since completion of the City's downtown plan, as multi -family residential (the "Property'). Subject to approval of the request for public financial assistance, the Redeveloper plans to commence construction of the Project by October 1, 2018, and substantially complete construction by June 1, 2019. The cost for the Project is estimated at approximately $7.3 million (see Exhibit A, which is based on the Redeveloper's pro forma, dated April 21, 2018). The Redeveloper's request for public financial assistance is to assist with the extraordinary costs of redevelopment and construction of the Project. The Redeveloper has represented that it will not undertake the Project as proposed without the approval of the requested public financial assistance. This memorandum provides a review of the request based on Northland's analysis of the Redeveloper's application for assistance, including sources and uses of funds and operating pro forma for the Project. It is Northland's opinion that the Project as proposed, which includes an underground parking facility, is unlikely to occur but for the proposed public financial assistance, inclusive of the tax increment financing. Without the assistance, the Project is not expected to achieve the level of debt service coverage and returns needed to secure the necessary private financing and equity. The present value of the tax increment revenue available to reimburse the Redeveloper for project costs on a pay -go basis over a (maximum) 26 -year term is $862,000, plus interest at rate of 4.75%. The future value of the total payments to the Redeveloper, with interest, is estimated at $1,676,492. In addition to the pay -go tax increment payments, the Redeveloper is requesting $400,000 of up -front cash assistance, in the form of a grant from the EDA. The Redeveloper's anticipated source of funds for the Project includes the use of grant funds to pay a portion of the construction costs. The grant from the EDA will be used to meet specific City and EDA development criteria, primarily the completion of the underground parking (estimated at cost of approximately $540,000). Without the 150 South Fifth Street Suite 3300, Minneapolis, MN 55402 Main: (612) 851-5900 / Direct: (612) 851-4964 / Email: tomdalCnorthlandsecurities.com Member FINRA and SIPC I Registered with SEC and MSRB City of Monticello Affordable Housing Project June 6, 2018 Page 2 underground parking, the Project as proposed would not be feasible and the density (number of housing units) would need to be reduced. Northland finds that it is reasonable for the City and the EDA to consider public financial assistance for the Project, an affordable housing project, as necessary so that development by private enterprise will occur on the Property. The Project, inclusive of the higher level of density, is possible only with the construction of the underground parking, which will not occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future. Due to the extraordinary costs associated with acquisition and development of the Project, the Redeveloper is seeking public financial assistance from the EDA in the form a grant and pay -go tax increment financing assistance. The tax increment revenue is proposed to come from the establishment of Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-40 (the "TIF District") within the existing Central Monticello Redevelopment Project No. 1. The EDA will consider approval of the establishment of the TIF District and the Agreement on June 13, 2018, subject to City Council approval on June 25, 2018. The proposed plan for the TIF District is for the EDA to retain 100% of the increased net tax capacity from the Project to pay eligible costs. The plan provides that the EDA will retain 10% of the tax increment derived from the Property to reimburse the EDA for the cost of administering the TIF District and other project costs that may be paid directly by the EDA. The remaining 90% of the tax increment revenue collected will be available for payment to the Redeveloper to reimburse eligible costs, as defined in the Agreement. The eligible costs are proposed to include costs of acquisition of the Property, and costs of site preparation, public improvements, and structured parking. Exhibit B provides a summary of the estimated tax increment cash flow from the TIF District. The cash flow estimate assumes 26 years of tax increment collection, the maximum term allowed by state law, with an estimated decertification date of December 31, 2045. State law provides that the increase in property taxes from the captured tax capacity (from the increase in market value) applied against the local tax capacity rates may be captured to assist the Project. Referendum market value taxes and the State of Minnesota property tax for commercial property (not applicable for residential property) are not captured for tax increment financing. To reimburse the eligible costs incurred by the Redeveloper, the EDA will issue and the Redeveloper will purchase a Tax Increment Financing Revenue Note (the "TIF Note") in the maximum principal amount of $862,000. The TIF Note will be payable solely from net available semi-annual tax increments. Net available semi-annual tax increments shall be based on 90% of the tax increment collected from the Project within the TIF District. The TIF Note shall bear simple, non -compounding interest from the date that the EDA has determined paid invoices, as paid by the Redeveloper, in compliance with the terms of the Agreement, at 4.75%, from the date of issue per annum. In addition to the reimbursement of a portion of costs of the Project through issuance of the TIF Note, the EDA will pay a portion of the costs of structured parking required in connection with the Project, pursuant to and in conformity with the EDA's Policy Statements for Management of Available Tax City of Monticello Affordable Housing Project June 6, 2018 Page 3 Increment Financing Funds, adopted by the EDA on January 10, 2018. The EDA Grant will be in the amount of $400,000. 1Q 0 F� 1111, i 0 1 1�11�10 1 110 F1 11 I 1;1;11111:1 Northland conducted a review of the Redeveloper's application for financial assistance and pro forma dated April 21, 2018. Northland reviewed project cost estimates to ensure all anticipated sources and uses for the Project were properly included. Exhibit A provides information on the sources and uses of funds for the Project. Based on our review of the pro forma and under current market conditions, we find that the Project, as proposed, may not reasonably be expected to occur solely through private investment within the reasonably near future. Due to the costs associated with construction of the affordable housing units, the Project as proposed is feasible only through assistance, in part, from tax increment financing. This conclusion is supported by the following: The Redeveloper plans for the $7,325,254 of project cost for the Project to be funded from a combination of debt $5,562,583 (75.9%), equity and contributions $1,362,671(18.6%), and a $400,000 grant from the EDA (5.5%). The present value of the estimated future tax increment revenue from the TIF Note payments to the Redeveloper reduces the effective cost of the Project by an additional $862,000. Based on estimated net operating income, the effective return without the public financial assistance is not at a level the Project, as proposed, would proceed. The total cost per unit for the Project is $155,856 for the construction of 47 units, including the cost of the underground parking. The Project will include 3 studio units, 25 one -bedroom units, and 19 two-bedroom units. Based on Northland's experience with similar projects and given the location of the Project, we would expect total development costs to range between $95,000 and $155,000 per unit. The total per unit project cost is within this range. ■ The estimated average gross monthly rent for units, in the first stabilized year of the Project, is estimated at approximately $1,129 per month. The Project is estimated to include four stories, with underground parking. Monthly average gross rents are estimated at $1,000 for a one -bedroom unit to $1,350 for a two-bedroom unit. A minimum of 20% of the units are planned to be affordable at 50% of the average median income (AMI for Wright County as of fiscal year 2018 is $47,150). The annual total gross rental income for the Project is estimated at $636,600 in the first year of stabilized occupancy, before adjusting for estimated apartment vacancy and rental loss of 5%. The total annual expense, operating and non-operating, is estimated at $3,398 per unit. This includes a 5% management fee and approximately $271 per unit (2%) for replacement reserve. The contribution to reserves is reasonable and the projected total annual expense is within industry standards. The estimated average debt service coverage with tax increment financing is estimated to average 1.12X during the first five years of stabilized operations, and without tax increment assistance the average is 1.02X. The coverage for the mortgage without the tax increment is City of Monticello Affordable Housing Project June 6, 2018 Page 4 not at a level that we would expect the Project, as proposed, to proceed. The financing of this type of project would be expected to be at a minimum of approximately 1.2X coverage. The estimated annual cash on cash return (net annual operating income divided by total development project costs) with tax increment financing is estimated to average 5.8% during the first five years of stabilized operations and 5.3% without tax increment assistance. The cash on cash return is reasonable for this type of project and the proposed source of financing. EXHIBIT A City of Monticello Briggs Company Affordable Housing Project Developer Sources and Uses of Funds for Construction Sources of Funds First Mortgage Grant from Monticello EDA Developer Equity Total Sources of Funds Uses of Funds Land Acquisition Construction Development Fee WAC and SAC Financing and Other Soft Costs Contingency Total Uses of Funds City of Monticello Affordable Housing Project June 6, 2018 Page 5 Total % of Total Per Unit $5,562,583 75.9% $118,353 $400,000 5.5% $8,511 $1,362,671 18.6% $28,993 $7,325,254 100.0% $155,856 $675,000 9.2% $14,362 $5,593,262 76.4% $119,006 $103,448 1.4% $2,201 $403,344 5.5% $8,582 $350,200 4.8% $7,451 $200,000 2.7% $4,255 $7,325,254 100.0% $155,856 Number of Units 47 City of Monticello Affordable Housing Project June 6, 2018 Page 6 EXHIBIT B City of Monticello Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-40 (Housing) Briggs Projected Tax Increment Cash Flow s Kev Asssumotions 1 Taxable market value (TMV) annual growth assumption = 1.00%. 2 Taxable Market Value = 47 units at $116,994 per unit. 3 Base Tax Capacity calcluated on base taxable market value = $138,500 PID: 155010036030 4 Assume Pay 2018 Tax Year. 5 Present value based on semi-annual payments, and indicated rate above, and beginning on date of 1/1/2019. 6 All figures are estimated. Less Tax Present TIF Taxes Taxable Base Tax Captured Assumed Tax Present Net New Tax State Increment Less City Value Net District Payable Market Capacity Tax Original Increment Value TIF Available Year Year Value 1 z Capacity p � a Capacity Tax Rate a (TIF) Fee (TIF) After After Fees Admin TIF Available (0.36%) Fee TIF s 4.00% 4.75% 1 2020 2,749,354 34,367 (1,731) 32,636 88.994% 29,044 (105) 28,939 26,914 (2,894) 26,045 23,899 2 2021 5,553,696 69,421 (1,731) 67,690 88.994% 60,240 (217) 60,023 80,568 (6,002) 54,021 71,195 3 2022 5,609,233 70,115 (1,731) 68,384 88.994% 60,858 (219) 60,639 132,668 (6,064) 54,575 116,786 4 2023 5,665,325 70,817 (1,731) 69,085 88.994% 61,482 (221) 61,261 183,259 (6,126) 55,135 160,731 5 2024 5,721,978 71,525 (1,731) 69,793 88.994% 62,112 (224) 61,888 232,383 (6,189) 55,700 203,091 6 2025 5,779,198 72,240 (1,731) 70,509 88.994% 62,749 (226) 62,523 280,084 (6,252) 56,271 243,922 7 2026 5,836,990 72,962 (1,731) 71,231 88.994% 63,391 (228) 63,163 326,401 (6,316) 56,847 283,280 8 2027 5,895,360 73,692 (1,731) 71,961 88.994% 64,041 (231) 63,810 371,377 (6,381) 57,429 321,218 9 2028 5,954,313 74,429 (1,731) 72,698 88.994% 64,697 (233) 64,464 415,049 (6,446) 58,018 357,786 10 2029 6,013,857 75,173 (1,731) 73,442 88.994% 65,359 (235) 65,124 457,455 (6,512) 65,124 396,952 11 2030 6,073,995 75,925 (1,731) 74,194 88.994% 66,028 (238) 65,790 498,631 (6,579) 65,790 434,703 12 2031 6,134,735 76,684 (1,731) 74,953 88.994% 66,704 (240) 66,464 538,613 (6,646) 66,464 471,092 13 2032 6,196,082 77,451 (1,731) 75,720 88.994% 67,386 (243) 67,143 577,436 (6,714) 67,143 506,167 14 2033 6,258,043 78,226 (1,731) 76,494 88.994% 68,075 (245) 67,830 615,133 (6,783) 67,830 539,976 15 2034 6,320,624 79,008 (1,731) 77,277 88.994% 68,771 (248) 68,523 651,736 (6,852) 68,523 572,565 16 2035 6,383,830 79,798 (1,731) 78,067 88.994% 69,475 (250) 69,225 687,278 (6,922) 69,225 603,977 17 2036 6,447,668 80,596 (1,731) 78,865 88.994% 70,185 (253) 69,932 721,790 (6,993) 69,932 634,254 18 2037 6,512,145 81,402 (1,731) 79,671 88.994% 70,902 (255) 70,647 755,300 (7,065) 70,647 663,439 19 2038 6,577,266 82,216 (1,731) 80,485 88.994% 71,626 (258) 71,368 787,837 (7,137) 71,368 691,569 20 2039 6,643,039 83,038 (1,731) 81,307 88.994% 72,358 (260) 72,098 819,431 (7,210) 72,098 718,684 21 2040 6,709,469 83,868 (1,731) 82,137 88.994% 73,097 (263) 72,834 850,108 (7,283) 72,834 744,820 22 2041 6,776,564 84,707 (1,731) 82,976 88.994% 73,843 (266) 73,577 879,895 (7,358) 73,577 770,011 23 2042 6,844,330 85,554 (1,731) 83,823 88.994% 74,597 (269) 74,328 908,817 (7,433) 74,328 794,292 24 2043 6,912,773 86,410 (1,731) 84,678 88.994% 75,359 (271) 75,088 936,900 (7,509) 75,088 817,697 25 2044 6,981,901 87,274 (1,731) 85,543 88.994% 76,128 (274) 75,854 964,169 (7,585) 75,854 840,256 26 2045 7,051,720 88,146 (1,731) 86,415 88.994% 76,904 (277) 76,627 990,645 (7,663) 76,627 862,000 TOTAL = 1,735,411 (6,247) 1,729,164 (172,916) 1,676,492 Kev Asssumotions 1 Taxable market value (TMV) annual growth assumption = 1.00%. 2 Taxable Market Value = 47 units at $116,994 per unit. 3 Base Tax Capacity calcluated on base taxable market value = $138,500 PID: 155010036030 4 Assume Pay 2018 Tax Year. 5 Present value based on semi-annual payments, and indicated rate above, and beginning on date of 1/1/2019. 6 All figures are estimated. it Y -k- I jAI- yr�jyJ]..��;j (}�.e.)��]}y. jf'�jj��}[//y) 4,�P ■/q (pJo�. (/�]�\ jVA�j1('�f.�i\ }��j�..aM�`�ST}bf�J�iG �' !f "'j[_�+};,.{��4�f _'�� q/�5■}/� -__ r J.� • it 4rw - / 'L/iM DOOP- � a �! ! / , l �) L irsl� �^6S ! ''F _�� /.Oa �i jjksik 7 h�� 11ZA t,� 5pol -gr IBJ C"nL-6 P, � .��t cy- AAV :� Sworn Construction I Sworn Construction Statement for 3rd Street Item Furnished Bd 1-Excavating/Gra_ding_ ! Excavating - 2 �! Concrete Work - _Kopp Concrete -- 3 ;Footings/Foundation Included # 2 Floor/Steps/Sidewalk l Included # 2 Inr-h irrcrl in $7 ; 144 Unit Budget i Unit Budget $ 150,000-00 $ 612, 000.00 I $ 13, 909.09 �_- �$ - 6 _ Driveway _ Omann Bros _ j $ 47,000.00 1 $ 1,068.18 7�Masonary- 8 ; $ 1--- I Included # 2 Included #1_- - 38 -- ---- --+-- Painting/Decorating :- --- ! 10 PT Painting - --_ 9 iWater/Sewer !Landscaping (Combined -see Bid ; $ TCH $ 47,553_45 ;_$ _ 5,160.00 I $ 1,080.76 117.27 10 _ Steel Doors East Side Glass 11 Stake Building _ ; Budget -Estimate- $ 8,689.$ 66 - 197.49 12 1 Carpentry Labor_ I Estimate $ 349,262_40 ; $ 7,937.78 13 14 _ iGyperete Lumber _ Viking Local j $ 1 $ 331000.00 $ 395,000.00 ; $ 750.00 8,977.27 15 Millwork --T-- 1TCH /Bayer Built - -� $ _ 214,189.20$ ------- - 4,867.94 1 16.--- 1 Cabinets Local - --- $ 122,256.23 ; $ 2,778.55 _ 17 18 Counter Tops Interior Trim Labor ' Window Sill Est --$ ADI 46 $ 24,000.00 $ 95,904.00 I $ - 545.45 2,179.64 l 19 !Windows _Thermotech _ _- $ -- 52,_413.60 $ 1,191.22 l 20 Hardware, Sills - Go $ 45,000.00 ; $ _1,022.73 21 _Roofing _ _- -_ EVC - _---- _ _ $--- _ 96,818.40 $ 2,200_42- - 22 23 I Trusses __Lumber Drywall Materials i Drywall Supply i $?- I $ 1.20 $ 0.03 24 jTaping/HangingOtto Drywall --_ $ - 310,000.00 7,045_45 3,621.93- 25 !Siding Mat/Labor_Quad City - T$ 159,364.80 $ 26 ;Fire Protection Sprinkler ,Express 103,941.6$ 362.31 2, - 27 'Fire Ext.- - -- _ ;Est _ - -- -__$ _ - L$ - 1,516.80 I $ 34.47 28 !St. Cloud Acoustics 1 Est I $ 119472.00 $ 260.73 i_ 29 --L--`---- !Insulation - _ _ City Wide _ _ $ --. 3,000.000 30 Plumbing _ - _-_ I Local _$ _ j $ -410,000.00 _132,000.0_0-I _ _ �$ 9,318.18 31 I HVAC__ j Local $ 477,839.88 $ 10,860.007 32 ! Electrical Wiring Bertram__---- _ - 1 _$_ 267,532.80$ _ _ - 6,080.29+— _ 33 !,Screen Enclosures I Screen Pro _ 34 Railings ' AIS s Ornimental 35Area of Refuge !Safe Security 36-"TV/Data Phone I 1 $ $ --$ -- ! $_- 54,673.20 1 $ 1,242.5 297127.60 $ _ 661.99 1_ 5,469.60 1 $ 124.31 22,980.00 $ 522.27 1 _ 37 j Low Volt Fire alarm ; $ 1--- 20,029.39 $ 455.21 - 38 -- ---- --+-- Painting/Decorating :- --- ! 10 PT Painting - --_ --1_ $ ----- --- 85,000.00 $ --+- - 1,931.82 39 Glass/Mirrors/Doors ! , $ - i East Side Glass 33,940.80 $ 771.38 --- 40 - -� !Garage Doors - !American DoorWorks $ $ 227.27---- --I 41 -- -- 1 Flooring --- ! MCI $ _ _10_,000.00 _ -- 7,045.45 42 Elevator _ i Schindler - _ - - $ _310,000.00$ 125,000.00 - 2,840.91 43 Bath Accessories Est i $ 7,800.00. $ 177.27 44 j M is Boxes _ _ I Salsbury Ind_ . _ $ 5,562.00 $ 12_6.41 45 Appliances - �Benusa - -- $ - 96,000.00 fi 2,181.82 _- 46 uIC tured ! marbletops&window Sills - Est --- $ 7,820.69 i $ _ 177.74 67200 A- XAN----Qi„A^ I ink+ r:/Y 4' 11 nnn nn Q tin nn) 48 j Video/SecurityNideo 1 j Protections Services $ 12,000.00 ', $ i 272.73-- - -� 49 _ 50 51General Interior _Decor iAshley St. Clou_ d Steel Fabrication _ Contracting ! $ $ i $ 6,000.00 $ 35,000.00 $_ 385,000.00 j $ 136.36 795.45 1 8,750.00 _- 52 �--- , $ - i Page 1 53 Total Cost 54 11 55 'General Conditions 56 Construction Cleanup 57 Final Clean up 58 Temp Electric & Gas 59 Tele hone 60 Temp.Toilet 61 - Temp.Heat 62 Job Trailer 63 Project Sign 64 ! Rental Lull 65 Insurance 66 Supervision/PM 67 -_ 68 Total General Conditions 69 _ 70 Soft Cost 71 Building Permit Architect/Engineering Appraisal 72 73 74 _ Wac/Sac 75 Environmental 113.64 Assessment 76 Legal 77 _ Soil Boring/Testing 78 Closing Cost 79 Interim Financing 80 Park Fees 81 Water Meter 82 Storm Sewer Sworn Construction $ 5,434,319.29 1 $ 123, 507.26 i $ 11, 586.00 $ 263.32 $ 4,137.60 $ 94.04 12,000.00 $ 272.73 _ 3,480.00 $ 79.09 3,310.34 $ 75.24 7,429.20 $ 168.85 15,000.00 $ _ 340.91 24, 000.00 $ 545.45 78, 000.00 $ _ 1,772.73 $ 158,943.14 $ 3,612.34 $ 24, 000.00 $ 545.45 _$ 90,990.00 I $ 2,067.95 $ 4,500-00 $ 102.27 $ 403, 344.00 $ 9,166.91 $ 1,655.17 $ 37.62 $ 12,000.00 $ 272.73 $ 5,000.00 $ 113.64 $ 40,000.00 $ 909.09 $ 150,000.00 $ 3,409.09 $_ 1$ - $ 20,400.00 L$ 463.64 Inspection _ $ 1,655.17 $ 83 Developers Fee $ 103,448.00 $ 84 Land $ 675,000.00 $ 85 Soil Corrections $ 86 Special Assessments $ 87 7continqency $ 200,000.00 $ 88 Total $ 1,731,992.34 , $ 89 'TIFF Credit Underground $ (500,000.00) $ $ 91 $ 96 _ $ 97 Conti encs _ _ $ 98 $ 6,825,254.78 $ Page 2 37.62 2,351.09 15, 340.91 4,545.45 39, 363.46 (11,363.64), 155,119.43 M ®® 099 E MMMDE ME ODE MM ®EMMO®MMMS1 ®®M MEMMMMMM ®M&Z ®E®MEmE M E EMZ®M M MMMM REM E®MM MMM® M M MM MEMM ON S M T W T F S 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 March 6 Developer submits application for assistance 11- 13M 15 16 17 March 14 Staff informs EDA of application and process, EDA requests City Council to call hearing 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25' 26 27 28 29 30 31 March 28 EDA workshop to consider application request S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8- 10- 12 13 14 April 9 City Council calls for public hearing 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 - 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 S M T W T F S S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8- 10 11 12 May 9 EDA acts to terminate Agreement with Masters Fifth Avenue, Inc. for Redevelopment TIF District 1-35 130 15 16 17 18 19 May 15 Last day for written notice to county commissioner (469.175, Subd. 2a) 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 May 25 Last day TIF plan and fiscal implications to County and School District (469.175, Subd. 2) 27 28 M 30 31 May 26 First day to publish hearing notice S M T W T F S June 7 City to submit notice to newspaper 1 2 June 5 Planning Commission review 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 June 14 Notice published in newspaper 10- 120 14 15 16 June 15 Last day to publish hearing notice 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 June 13 EDA approval of TIF and Develpoment Agreement, subject to Council Approval of TIF 24- 26 27 28 29 30 June 25 City Council Hearing Date - Approval of TIF Plan and Development Agreement* *Prior to establishing TIF 1-40, City Council will need to act to approve resolution decertifying TIF District 1-35 June 29 Request certification by County June 29 Submit plan to State June 30 Actual Certification Date (No Later than this Date) Notes: 1. City will submit notice to the newspaper for publication 2. . Denotes City Council meeting date Denotes EDA meeting date 3. Documents: a. City Council resolution calling for hearing and notice b. EDA resolution terminating agreement with Master Fifth and requesting City Council decertify TIF 1-35 C. TIF Plan d. EDA resolution approving TIF e. EDA resolution approving agreement with The Briggs Companies for affordable housing project f. City Council resolution approving TIF g. City Council resolution approving interfund loan resolution (if applicable) h. City Council resolution for decertification of TIF 1-35 i. Contract for Private Development by and between EDA and The Briggs Companies j. Planning Commission resolution regarding conformance TIF District 1-40 (Housing) NORTHLAND PUBLIC RNANCE 3/23/2018 Ad Proof Enlarged CITY OF MONTICELLO .JSTATE OF MINNESOTA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Publishers Inc. Exhibit A NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council (the "Council') of the City of Monticello, Minneso- ta, will hold a public hearing on Public Notice Ad Proof- matelyy63u0 p.m., iin18thetCittypHall Council Chambers, relating to the proposed establishment of Tax This is the proof of your ad scheduled to run on the dates Increment Financing District No. indicated below. Please roof read careful) if Changes are needed 1-40 within the Central Monticello p Y g � Redevelopment Project No. 1, and please contact us prior to deadline at the proposed establishment of the Tax Increment Financing Plan re - Cambridge (763) 691-6000 or email at publicnotice@ecm-inc.com lating to Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-40, all pursuant to and in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001 through 469.047, both inclusive, as amend- ed and Minnesota Statutes, Sec- tions 469.090 through 469.1081, both inclusive, as amended, and Minnesota Statutes, Section Publications: 469.174 through 469.1794, both inclusive, as amended (collectively, Monticello Times the "Act"). Copies of the proposed Date: 05/15/18 Tax Increment Financing Plan will be on file and available for public inspection at the office of the City Account #: 429204 Clerk at City Hall. The property included within Customer: CITY OF MONTICELLO — Central Monticello Redevelop- ment Project No. 1 is described in the Development Program on file in the office of the City Clerk. The Address: 505 WALNUT ST STE 1 property to be included within the MONTICELLO proposed Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-40 is described in the Tax Increment Financing Plan on TeleTelephone: 763 295-2711 file in the office of the City Clerk. p ( ) The boundaries of Central Monti - Fax: (763) 295-4404 cello Redevelopment Project No. 1 and the proposed Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 -40 are shown in the adjacent map. All interested persons may ap- pear at the hearing and present their views orally or in writing prior Ad ID: 816703 to the hearing to City Hall, 505 Wal- nut Street, Monticello, MN 55362. Copy Line: TIF District 1-40 BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUN- CIL PO Number: /s/ Jennifer Schreiber, City Clerk Published in the Start: 06/14/18 Monticello Times Stop: 06/14/2018 Jun816703 18 Total Cost: $129.22 # of Lines: 61 Total Depth: 6.778 # of Inserts: 1 Ad Class: 150 Phone # (763) 691-6000 Email: publicnotice@ecm-inc.com Rep No: SM700 Contract -Gross City Council Agenda — 6/25/2018 4A. Consideration of approving a request for a PUD (Planned Unit Development) Adiustment in the Amax Addition. Applicant: StorageLink of Monticello, LLC. (AS) Property: Legal: Lot 1, Block 2, Amax Addition, additional Address: 36 Dundas Road Planning Case Number: 2018-030 A. REFERENCE & BACKGROUND Request(s): PUD Adjustment to accommodate revisions to site interim use and signage Deadline for Decision: August 18th, 2018 Land Use Designation: Places to Shop Zoning Designation: B-3, Highway Business The purpose of the "B-3" Highway Business district is to provide for limited commercial and service activities and provide for and limit the establishment of motor vehicle oriented or dependent commercial and service activities. Overlays/Environmental Regulations Applicable: NA Current Site Use: Self -Storage Surrounding Land Uses: North: Commercial East: Vacant (Zoned B-3) South: Vacant (Zoned B-4) West: Commercial Project Description: The applicant proposes to expand the existing interim use component of the approved PUD to allow an additional four temporary storage units on the site. The applicant will also be converting office space within the northeasterly existing building to internally accessed self -storage. The applicant also proposes to remove the existing pylon in favor of wall signage on a proposed parapet architectural feature. City Council Agenda — 6/25/2018 ANALYSIS Planned Unit Development Adjustments are regulated by Chapter 2, Section 2.4 (0)(10)(b), as follows: (b) PUD Adjustment — an adjustment to a PUD may be made through review and approval by a simple majority vote of the City Council with or without referral to the Planning Commission. For a PUD Adjustment, the applicant shall follow the procedures and requirements of the PUD Final Stage as identified in this Chapter. A PUD Adjustment shall be memorialized with an amendment to the PUD Development Agreement, executed by the City and applicant, and recorded against the PUD property. To qualify for this review, the minor adjustment shall not: (i) Eliminate, diminish or be disruptive to the preservation and protection of sensitive site features. (ii) Eliminate, diminish or compromise the high quality of site planning, design, landscaping or building materials. (iii) Alter significantly the location of buildings, parking areas or roads. (iv) Increase or decrease the number of residential dwelling units by more than five percent. (v) Increase the gross floor area of non-residential buildings by more than three percent or increase the gross floor area of any individual building by more than five percent (residential lots not guided for specific structure sizes are excluded from this requirement). (vi) Increase the number of stories of any building. (vii) Decrease the amount of open space or alter it in such a way as to change its original design or intended function or use. (viii) Create non-compliance with any condition attached to the approval of the Final PUD Plan. The primary focus of the PUD adjustment request is the applicant's proposal to allow the expansion of the 2014 PUD Amendment approval for interim use of temporary storage containers on site. The 2014 approval included a site plan which illustrated temporary storage containers to be used for self -storage purposes along the southeasterly portion of the site. When applicant purchased the property in February, four additional units had been placed in areas beyond that illustrated on the site plan. Two additional units are located along the southeastern boundary of the site and two additional units were placed internal to the site, along an internal access route. The internal drive aisle in this area appears to be maintained at 24'. The applicant is requesting that the four additional temporary storage units be allowed to remain for the term of the interim use permit, which runs for an additional six years. In approving the request, Council will be making the determination that the proposed expansion is consistent with the 2014 PUD amendment's intent and purpose. If permitted under the PUD adjustment, the applicant will be required to OJI City Council Agenda — 6/25/2018 enter into an encroachment agreement as the southerly units may encroach into the City's drainage and utility easement. Council will note that in addition to the above adjustment, the northwesterly -most building on the site is proposed for alteration by the addition of a new parapet feature. The parapet is an architectural feature enhancement and will not include any additional storage. It is consistent with the branding the applicant uses for other storage sites. It is not considered a "story" as it is not adding usable space. The parapet meets the maximum height requirement for the district at 30' and will include the addition of two 42 square foot wall signs on the north and west elevations. The proposed wall signage is well under the 15% allowed by code and is further supported by the elimination of the current pylon sign on the site, which does not meet required setbacks but was allowed under a prior PUD approval. In terms of the internal building configuration, the applicant proposes to replace the existing office space within the northeasterly -most building with 12 internally accessed self -storage bays. The space being converted is just over 2,000 square feet in area. In reviewing past approvals for the PUD, it is unclear when tenant office spaces were permitted within the building as part of the PUD. Staff believes the conversion to self -storage is a more consistent use of the site and buildings for both the PUD and site. No site plan modifications or exterior entrance modifications are proposed to support this change. An on-site caretaker is not required by ordinance. The signage change and internal configuration components are supported by existing ordinance allowances. No other proposed site changes are proposed. The proposed project adjustments do not increase the size of the existing buildings or change basic site infrastructure, but instead, make changes to the buildings to accommodate an additional architectural feature for signage, an internal use configuration adjustment to a single building, and expansion of allowance for four temporary storage containers on-site. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS Motion to adopt Resolution No. 2018-53, approving the proposed PUD Adjustment for the Amax Addition, based on findings including that the proposed adjustment is consistent with the requirements for PUD Adjustments in the zoning ordinance, and with the Conditions listed in Exhibit Z. 2. Motion to deny adoption of Resolution No.2018-53, based on findings identified by the City Council. 3. Motion of other. 3 City Council Agenda — 6/25/2018 C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the PUD Adjustment, subject to the conditions outlined in Exhibit Z. The addition of four temporary storage units does not substantially alter the PUD's intent as the use is interim in nature. The building and signage changes are consistent with ordinance allowances and the nature of the PUD for self -storage. D. SUPPORTING DATA A. Resolution 2018-53 B. Applicant Narrative C. Aerial Site Image and Expansion Illustration D. Proposed Building Elevations & Floor Plan E. 2014 PUD Amendment Site Plan F. 2014 PUD Conditions of Approval, Council Minutes EXHIBIT Z StorageLink PUD Adjustment 36 Dundas Road Amax Addition and PUD 1. The applicant enter into a PUD Adjustment development agreement, including any required assignment of agreement, specifying the scope of the project and terms of the City Council's approval. 2. At the direction of the Building Official, provide an updated property survey for building permit review and to verify location of the two southerly units. 3. The applicant shall enter into an encroachment agreement as related to the placement of the two southerly temporary storage units within the City drainage and utility easement. 4. Per the applicant's narrative, the existing pylon sign shall be removed in favor of the proposed wall signage elements and all sign permit requirements shall be met. 5. The four additional temporary storage units are permitted with termination as an interim use to coincide with the 2024 expiration, consistent with the 2014 PUD amendment approval. No additional temporary storage units may be authorized without an amendment to PUD. L! City Council Agenda — 6/25/2018 6. Comments of City Council and other City Staff as adopted. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2018-53 APPROVAL OF AN ADJUSTMENT TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR STORAGELINK AT 36 DUNDAS ROAD WHEREAS, the applicant, owner of the property at the above-named address, has requested an adjustment to an existing PUD; and WHEREAS, said adjustment will accommodate a land use that is consistent with the existing allowable and interim uses on the property; and WHEREAS, the proposed uses, together with the recommended conditions of approval, will constitute a use that is consistent with the intent of the zoning ordinance and comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the requirements for PUD Adjustment in the Monticello zoning ordinance have been met; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Monticello make the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: 1. The additional storage containers will continue to permit reasonable traffic access and flow; 2. The proposed signage provides an enhancement to the current building design and brings the site into conformance with code allowances; 3. The proposed use is consistent with the intent of the zoning ordinance of the City of Monticello; 4. The proposed uses in the PUD justify the adjustment under the PUD as proposed; 5. The PUD will not be detrimental to the reasonable use and development of surrounding property; 6. The PUD will not create negative impacts on surrounding public roadways or other public facilities. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota: The Monticello City Council hereby approves the PUD Adjustment, subject to the following conditions: CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2018-53 1. The applicant enter into a PUD Adjustment development agreement, including any required assignment of agreement, specifying the scope of the project and terms of the City Council's approval. 2. At the direction of the Building Official, provide an updated property survey for building permit review and to verify location of the two southerly units. 3. The applicant shall enter into an encroachment agreement as related to the placement of the two southerly temporary storage units within the City drainage and utility easement. 4. Per the applicant's narrative, the existing pylon sign shall be removed in favor of the proposed wall signage elements and all sign permit requirements shall be met. 5. The four additional temporary storage units are permitted with termination as an interim use to coincide with the 2024 expiration, consistent with the 2014 PUD amendment approval. No additional temporary storage units may be authorized without an amendment to PUD. 6. Comments of City Council and other City Staff as adopted. ADOPTED this 25th day of June, 2018, by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. ATTEST: Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL On K Brian Stumpf, Mayor P.O. Box 428 Sartell, MN 56377 Sturagg'' ink Tel: 320.240.2893 SELF STORAGE 877.922.2893 www.StorageLink.net Greetings — On February 2611 of this year, StorageLink purchased Amax Self Storage in Monticello. StorageLink is a Self Storage company that operates 13 facilities in central Minnesota. We are different than many Self Storage operations in that we service all of our facilities from one customer service office in Sartell, MN. All of our facilities are tied electronically to our Sartell office and allow us to monitor, communicate and control access 24 hours a day to each facility. We operate currently operate a facility in Clearwater and Albertville, making Monticello a perfect addition for our customers. We have applied for a permit to construct a sign tower to add an architectural enhancement to the roof line, which we would then remove the current pylon sign. We also plan to construct Climate Controlled units that would take the place of the current office areas. These improvement, along with some painting and maintenance issues would be completed by the end of this summer. When working with staff, it was brought to our attention, that there are four stand-alone units that were placed by the previous owner, outside of the original location plan provided. I've included a map showing the original location plan in pink and the four units outside that area in yellow. The temporary permit allowing these stand-alone units expires in approximates six more years and at that time all of the units would either be removed or a new permit would need to be acquired. Since the units are occupied, we are asking that the adjustment be made to allow the four units to stay for the remainder of the current permit. We look forward to long lasting relationship with the City of Monticello. I know that you will find StorageLink to be positive addition for your community. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to ask. Sincerely, 1 &�# 4" '"' 11 Bruce Stainbrook 3 d to m O N O_ O G) O O t0 SD K d L G d d 0 N O_ W C) O O O (D N O .i' c ® a C 0 0 Co m v BICB/(Y AW2 e� . � > _— \ ll \l I ' 10•C 339.13 1 , � \� , � SS 1 � b• 1 I . y ` yyT 1 1 S �s ^6, SA wit\ �� '�� ,\ i nla� ;'� `ala � oo•w'�w ;..al s,- qx •Tj>•. F, i i�il x e S 3H W�, S i$�+4 � a •� o yt 0� i 6 � t qy, sg�„ 9qa � nT�9 rt��G� � tg 3'4 g I AV g�`2° ' g�4 to qy q gg g yr $[S�gggq 4 s ifl 8 4 i P_ � 3 A$t4 � } �� ^ 9! �9 � � 1 � � � � 1b1• wl.eY• aeon. e�� e / ga18��"3g '� ? a ° alaypmaaea eY ;'„ ons oRnxi+ y. akwU<O��ilone elola ECKE teal 3 of b A�Sgoe,,,,..v"" 7't 40. 1719 Jo, A%783e0Sees YN oSM°lute: R� Sao \ j pp0\Z\0 ONS ° n u a' oa ... 03 No pX CONp\Z\ owe.. E)(\5 \\\ANN ` ` 0�0• MN C pN pX SEtF S ORpGE, \ S Wl vv OESGM1IP/� Exl*stl*nOffices into DRAFTING SYMBOLS � DESIGN/BUILD: onver ELECTRICAL, HVAC, PLUMBING, FIRE SUPPRESSION AND s�rr�eo>_ DESCRIPTION EMERGENCY NOTIFICATION DESIGN, SPECIFICATION AND ClimateControlledSpaces and REQUIRED DOCUMENTS ARE TO BE PREPARED UNDER A DESIGN/BUILD AGREEMENT WITH THE OWNER'S GENERAL NORTHCONTRACTOR AND ITS CONTRACTOR FOR THAT DISCIPLINE. • 00%%ew i naeTower NORTH ARROWNEWWALLS TO BE 3-5/5" METAL STUD a 16" O.G. TYP. 10�0� WITH 5/S" GYP. BD. BATT INSUL. WHERE REQ'D. SOLID HATCHED WALLS INDICATED EXISTING WALLS TO REMAIN MANAGERS ROOM NAME 36 DUNDAS ROAD OFFICE 120 ROOM NUMBER CODE ANALYSIS: APPLICABLE CODE: 2015 MN STATE BUILDING CODE MONTICELLO, MN 55362 AND 2015 MN ACCESSIBILITY CODE _ PROJECT DESCRIPTION: SECTION REFERENCE REMODELING EXISTING OFFICES INTO CLIMATE CONTROLLED SELF STORAGE AND NEW TOWER ON EXISTING BUILDING "D" ELEVATION REFERENCE SITE DATA.- TOTAL ATA:TOTAL SITE AREA: EXISTING SHEET ZONING: EXISTING, ALLOWABLE HEIGHT: EXISTING No. ARCHITECTURAL DETAIL REFERENCE BUBBLE HEIGHT REQ'D: 30'-0', PROVIDED 30'-0' TO MIDDLE OF CABLE ARCHITECTURAL _ SET BACK REQ'D. FRONT: EXISTING Al SHEET INDEX, DRAFTING SYMBOLS, PROJECT cLEVATION REFERENCE SIDES: EXISTING DESCRIPTION, AERIAL MAP, AND CODE ANALYSIS - REAR: EXISTING BUILDING AREA: A2 DEMOLITION PLAN, AND OVERALL FLOOR PLAN A3 ENLARGED FLOOR PLAN - BUILDING "A" CXIST. ELEVATION REFERENCE BUILDING A: X0,240 SF A4 FLOOR PLAN AND ROOF PLAN - BUILDING "D" OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION: A5 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - BUILDING "D" TOWER MODERATE HAZARD STORAGE, S -I A6 WALL SECTION AND DETAILS @ TOWER <v}— PARTITION TYPE REFERENCE S1 WALL SECTION AND DETAILS @ TOWER ALLOWABLE BUILDING HEIGHT AND AREAS I STORY, 9,000/FLOOR KEYNOTE REFERENCE NUMBER OF STORY: I STORY SPRINKLED BUILDING: NOT REQ'D. TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: V -B OWINDOW TYPE REFERENCE 51, SELF STORAGE FIRE -RESISTANCE RATING REQ'D. EXTERIOR WALL : 0 HR REV15ION REFERENCE INTERIOR WALL: 0 HR AER1AL 1"1,4 F NOT TO SCAL E TOWER LOCATION CLIMATE CONTROLLED STORAGE /'N� BUILDING "A" LOCATION PERSPECTIVE VIEW AT BUILDING "D" NOT TO SCALE H 00 o c6 f0. A • N Eao9 � P L mo 3 In 0 W �.�Q L y �mat' N � c0 E � w of n ■� :oLn bA a �zw cn N U O V N Cn M G1 r r i LICENSED •': ARCHITECT s No. 50476 �i�Uil I1 I I1111�1, Np� StunggSeL% A 6 E REVISIONS DATE SHEET TITLE AERIAL MAP, CODE ANALYSIS, AND SHEET INDEX DRAWN BY: DATE: Hung Ly 05-15, 2018 SHEET NO. O z Al 0 ry 00 o c6 f0. A • N Eao9 � P L mo 3 In 0 W �.�Q L y �mat' N � c0 E � w of G1 r r i LICENSED •': ARCHITECT s No. 50476 �i�Uil I1 I I1111�1, Np� StunggSeL% A 6 E REVISIONS DATE SHEET TITLE AERIAL MAP, CODE ANALYSIS, AND SHEET INDEX DRAWN BY: DATE: Hung Ly 05-15, 2018 SHEET NO. O z Al 0 ry EX. i� / 0 R�3 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ r J DEMOLITION FLOOR FLAN - BUILDING "A" SCALE: 3/16' = Il -0' N 0 1 OVERALL FLOOR PLAN - BUILDING "A" SCALE: 3/16' = II -0' REMOVE EXISTING / OUTLETS AND J LOW VOLTAGE REMOVE EXISTING / ACT AND GRID J THRU OUT, AND 1 FLOOR FINISH 11 REMOVE EXISTING WALLS, TYP., — REMOVE EXISTING DOOR, TYP., C^IuI IIVC3 r"Ul 1p11N3 FIXTURES AND ACCESSOIRIES REMOVE EXISTING / ACT AND GRID J THRU OUT, AND FLOOR FINISH REMOVE EXISTING COUTNER I REMOVE EXISTING WALLS, TYP., REMOVE EXISTING / OUTLETS AND J LOW VOLTAGE REMOVE EXISTING DOOR, TYP., i REMOVE EXISTING OUTLETS AND LOW VOLTAGE EXISTING PLUMBING E X. L ❑ REMOVE EXISTING 71J ACT AND GRID J THRU OUT, AND FLOOR FINISH REMOVE EXISTING / OUTLETS AND J LOW VOLTAGE 9 p C i // / LJ / / / / / /ri l Ex. EX. 0 r",' 71 ' 's ❑ 0 ❑ 7 LL I I r I I I I I r I I I I ® rr� II T \\ EX, H FIXTURES AND y ACCESSOIRIES REMOVE EXISTING WALLS, TYP., tw REMOVE EXISTING DOOR, TYP, O y�O)UCTQ N G E X. L ❑ REMOVE EXISTING 71J ACT AND GRID J THRU OUT, AND FLOOR FINISH REMOVE EXISTING / OUTLETS AND J LOW VOLTAGE 9 p C i // / LJ / / / / / /ri l Ex. EX. 0 r",' 71 ' 's ❑ 0 ❑ 7 LL I I r I I I I I r I I I I ® rr� II T \\ EX, H O y tw 10 O y�O)UCTQ N G y LL of � � ctS ees V Qrr�r�zw nsCA N U O o G., ++ N V N Cn M � O y tw 10 O y�O)UCTQ N G E LL of /LICENSED** ARCHITECT s • i r N No. 50476 . J► : �:'�: • OF'MlNN````� g� Storapl ink A3 (n Qj M OQJ Z neo .wcn �y,�^�zw •� r-4 •v=4 IV a aj o Z �U U � U REVISIONS DATE SHEET TITLE DEMOLITION FLOOR PLAN AND OVERALL FLOOR PLAN DRAWN BY: DATE: Hung Ly 05-15, 2018 SHEET NO. D A2 0 ry E X. o 13 11 TEM IN FILL WITH OA- DOOR vv METAL STUD AND GYP. BD. I I O.H. DOOR N 14'- 0"x 0" O.H. DOOR 1 4'-0'x&'-0" 01 . 2 11 IN FILL WITH METAL STUD AND GYP. BD. O.N. DOOR 15'-0"x 1'-6" OJ -4- DOOR (p' -0'x8'-0' 15'-0"x 1,40" F�// O.H. DOOR ' I � 5'-3/2" 0* 4' -II" 4'-(o'x 5'- 1 FFI EX. O.H. DOOR A'- 0'x8' - 0' 19' - 0'x V-0, ENLARGED FLOOR FLAN - BUILDING "All SCALE: 1/4' = I'-0' /EX. c�♦ 13 1:1 � � 13♦ ��❑ ♦ EM U IN FILL WITH I IN FILL WITH METAL STUD METAL STUD AND GYP. BD_ _ = AND GYP_ BD. EXISTING WALL 23' -0"x1' -(o" I I r 221-011x11-&11TO REMAIN EXISTING WALL TO REMAIN r I 22'-10" r I� //V/ 12'-0"x S'-0" EXISTING WALL r TO REMAIN r CSL P' S O Eh�l; //////////////:'//?,'///////////// //// m 22' -0"X1' -(o" r r 22'-1" 22'-0"xI'-(o' r r n EMERGENCY EXIT SIGN AND LIGHT WITH BATTERY BACKUP POWER_ INSTALL AT 8--0- AFF. UNLESS NOTED ON PLAN NOTE: PROVIDE FIRE DAMPERS AT ALL PENETRATIONS IN THE RATED FLOORS, WALLS AND CEILINGS ASSEMBLY WALL TYPES NEW WALL: EXTEND NEW WALLS TO UNDERSIDE OF DECK, TYP. I EXISTING WALL NEW WALLS TO BE 3-5/8" METAL STUD IV 24 'O.C. TYP. WITH 5/8' GYP, BD. BATT INSUL. WHERE REQ'D. SOLID HATCHED WALLS INDICATED EXISTING WALLS TO REMAIN TABLE 1108.3 2015 MN ACCESSIBILITY CODE 13 • .05 = S SPACES I HANDICAPPED UNIT REQUIRED I HANDICAPPED UNIT PROVIDED H o (6 2 >, • N E G"* U C �� F E - 42 N . n -Q 00 •.' N )-Bic o ¢ 4-a 16.4 0) = O O on t � E U LU *+ .� Qj cn Q �zW cd �LN, � 0 M N V O V N (f) M a o (6 2 >, • N E G"* U C �� F E - N . n -Q 00 •.' N )-Bic o ¢ 0) = O O on t � E U LU ��` .�'• ••• �; ''moi LICENSED ARCHITECT cP ? No. 50476 /4 OF 1117 11111M'NN�`� f� q torage. SELF STORAGE REVISIONS DATE SHEET TITLE ENLARGED FLOOR PLAN DRAWN BY: DATE: Hung Ly 05-15, 2018 SHEET NO. O z A3U w O ry 0- NEW TOWER METAL ROOF NEW METAL ROOF AS NEEDED NEW METAL ROOF AS NEEDED 2 ROOF FLAN - BUILDING "D " SCALE-- 3/16' = V-0' NEW 20'-io"x24'-O" TOWER ON BUILD ON TOP OF EXISTING ROOF 3 I A3 A6 20'-&" V.IF_ TOWER M 4C u oFLOOR FLAN - BUILDING "D" SCALE: 3/16'= V-0' 2 A6 EXISTING ROOF TO REMAIN EXISTING ROOF TO REMAIN -"L-----rml"L-----row"t-----rawL-----rml'L �'L-----ot rl -————— - rl�L------ rml"L— — — —— 1 ----- ----- - - - --�-----4F tor47 SELFs oR E T, REVISIONS DATE SHEET TITLE ROOF PLAN AND OVER ALL BUILDING "D" FLOOR PLAN DRAWN BY: DATE: Hung Ly 05-15, 2018 SHEET NO. O z A4 0 ry H 42 4-a 16.4 *+ .� cn i L � M cuz W 9 C N U O V N (n M co '� I 6 • ( 2 >, N o E G U 'C �� L2 ir) .>'> CD ¢ Sm Cdr =0 O Lo E I w • •'': ell :� i .� LICENSED ARCHITECT ? No. U976 (P: P, .• ::'� 4111OF J tor47 SELFs oR E T, REVISIONS DATE SHEET TITLE ROOF PLAN AND OVER ALL BUILDING "D" FLOOR PLAN DRAWN BY: DATE: Hung Ly 05-15, 2018 SHEET NO. O z A4 0 ry EXISTING ROOF TO REMAIN NORTH ELEVATION SCALE-- METAL CALE-- METAL ROOFING B.O. EAVE 124'-10" 2xI2 FRIEZER BOARD WITH METAL WRAP STEEL BATTEN i PANEL TO MATCH EXISTING SIGANGE T.O. SLAB ljK;' J 3 50UTI4 ELEVATION SCALE: 3/16' = I'-0' Storiff 1 SELF� T I EXIST. NEW COUNTER METAL FLASHING - NEW METAL ROOF AS NEEDED METAL ROOFING B.O. EAVE f 124'-10" '-0' - 2x12 FRIEZER BOARD WITH METAL WRAP STEEL BATTEN PANEL TO MATCH EXISTING SIGANGE NEW COUNTER METAL FLASHING NEW METAL ROOF AS NEEDED T.O. SLAB EXISTING ROOF TO REMAIN 00 o c6 AU.. >, • N E 0. U -0 a� c m 12 mO -1.1 ,n > N.U+ I I R = I I EXIST_ —� EXIST_ I I il 12 \ 2 -0j = Jr t JIr isS S L1F I f I I I EXIST, EXIST. I X 2 WEST ELEVATION SCALE: 3/16' = P -0' METAL ROOFING 2xI2 FRIEZER BOARD WITH METAL WRAP B.O. EAVE 124'-10" STEEL BATTEN PANEL TO MATCH EXISTING SIGANGE NEW COUNTER METAL FLASHING I I I I I EXISTING BOLLARD TO REMAIN moi- I EXIST. I I EXIST. T.O. SLAB 4 EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 3/16' = I' -0' �II 2' - 0'1 '0r 2x12 FRIEZER BOARD WITH METAL WRAP B.O. EAVE 124'-10" STEEL BATTEN PANEL TO MATCH EXISTING NEW COUNTER METAL FLASHING T -0-5L,45 iV-)v -V H 00 o c6 AU.. >, • N E 0. U -0 a� c m 12 mO -1.1 ,n > N.U+ c0 R = 42 N W n'Q 00 •.'- �r N _ >,, 04m,fl xv. c, ai C •, CL) d t ¢ 4-a 16.4 = m C w *+ .� cn Ln Q �zW 0 M N V O V N U*) M VIC LICENSED ARCHITECT s . i r ,^ No. 50476 •• Q�� Op �wilillfl111111tt 95ap.tora.q#lh7k REVISIONS DATE SHEET TITLE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS DRAWN BY: DATE: Hung Ly 05-15, 2018 SHEET NO. O z A5 0 ry 00 o c6 AU.. >, • N E 0. U -0 a� c m 12 mO -1.1 ,n > N.U+ c0 R = o N N W n'Q 00 •.'- �r N _ >,, 04m,fl xv. c, ai C •, CL) d t ¢ E -9 CD = m C w VIC LICENSED ARCHITECT s . i r ,^ No. 50476 •• Q�� Op �wilillfl111111tt 95ap.tora.q#lh7k REVISIONS DATE SHEET TITLE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS DRAWN BY: DATE: Hung Ly 05-15, 2018 SHEET NO. O z A5 0 ry 2'-0 24'-0„ 2'- 0 �� r �� i O J olBUILDING SECTION SCALE: 1/4' -- I'-0' i / I \ p a SIMPSON P25T TRUSS TIE EACH END EACH TRUSS METAL ROOFING RED ROSIN PAPER ' OSB SHEATHING PRE -ENGINEER ROOF TRUSSES, SEE STRUCT. PRE -FINISHED METAL DRIP EDGE 2x(o WITH METAL FASCIA )FFT PANEL LxiL r�ictc BOARD WRAP WITH SHEET METAL STEEL BATTEN PANEL BUILDING WRAP 5/8' OSB EXT. SHEATHING 2xro WOOD STUD 16, O.C. n n T EXISTING 2xCo PURLINS TO REMAIN TOP CHORD TO TRUSS LOWER CHORD OF TRUSS 2x4 TREATED PLATE EXISTING CONC. SLAB TO REMAIN 2 WALL SECTION SCALE: 1/2' -- I'-0' PROVIDE (2) 2x4 WOOD STUDS 6 24' O.C., REF. STRUCT. SEE STRUCTURAL SHEET FOR ADDITIONAL NAILING AND CONNECTION INFOR" IAT ION PROVIDE (2) 2x4 WOOD STUDS ID 24" O.C., REF. STRUCT. EXISTING METAL ROOF TO REMAIN EXISTING 2x& PURLINS TO REMAIN TOP CHORD TO TRUSS LOWER CHORD OF TRUSS 2x4 TREATED PLATE EXISTING CONC. SLAB TO REMAIN �I (:: 3 WALL SECTION SCALE: 1/2' -- I'-0' METAL ROOFING RED ROSIN PAPER ' OSB SHEATHING PRE—ENGINEER ROOF TRUSSES, SEE STRUCT, PRE -FINISHED V METAL DRIP EDGE 2x(2 WITH METAL / FASCIA X SOFFT PANEL 2x12 FRIEZE BOARD WRAP WITH SHEET METAL STEEL BATTEN PANEL –� BUILDING WRAP r'/s" OSB EXT. SHEATHING 2xro WOOD STUD 6 Uo' OL- T.C METAL FLASHING NEW 2x6 PURLINS, REF, STRUCT. T T.O. PLATE %1 124'—I0�qF (3) 2x10 STRUCTURAL SUPPORTS, REF. STRUCT. 2x4 WOOD BRACING AT 32' O.C. SIMSON A34 . 110'-9" V.I.F. CUT AND REMOVE PORTION OF METAL ROOF AS NEEDED FOR NEW STRUCTURAL BEAM — EXISTING ROOF TRUSSES AND PURLINS TO REMAIN, TYP. EXISTING WALL TO REMAIN WALL SECTION SCALE: 1/2' = 1'-O' EXISTING CONC. SLAB TO REMAIN T.O. 5L,45. 4t1 loo' -o" . �r H co o 16 2 >' • N Ec�oo v 10 mo 3 ,n > N —0 7 y co CD 42 00 •.'N N 4-a 16.4 =OO t Ur w *+ .� bc Qj cn Q �zW cd �LN, � 0 M N U O V N U') M � co o 16 2 >' • N Ec�oo v 10 mo 3 ,n > N —0 7 y co CD 00 •.'N N ESmC� T =OO t Ur w VIP— LICENSED ARCHITECT cP ? No. U976 + �:�� ++gyp .1/ 4, 0 %% % p\N storagseF f oR E O � V •� A C) z C) VJ C) �• • T-4 X G AH W •�•+ -+� 0 O z �U O U U REVISIONS DATE SHEET TITLE WALL SECTIONS AND DETAILS DRAWN BY: DATE: Hung Ly 05-15, 2018 SHEET NO. D A6U w O ■ w F- 10 ROOF FRAMING NOTES: 1. FOR GENERAL STRUCTURAL NOTES AND SPECIFICATIONS SEE S1. 2. REFER TO THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR DIMENSIONS OF WALLS, OPENINGS, AND ADDITIONAL DETAILS OR SECTIONS. 04 0) Ln I NO N J 1 KUI,1 UKHL iVV i tJ HiVU Jr'tl.ir il.Hi iViVJ: BUILDING CODES A. LATEST EDITION OF MINNESOTA STATE BUILDING CODE AND IBC. B. MEET REQUIREMENTS OF ALL PREVAILING CODES. DESIGN LIVE LOADS GROUND SNOW LOAD: 50 PSF ROOF SNOW LOAD: 35 PSF* ROOF DEAD LOAD: 11 PSF (WOOD FRAMING AND ROOFING) UNBALANCED SNOW LOAD: WINDWARD: 10.5 PSF LEEWARD 63 PSF WIND: 90 MPH, EXPOSURE B SEISMIC: DESIGN CATEGORY "A" OTHERS: PER BUILDING CODE * PLUS SNOW BUILDUP IN ACCORDANCE WITH BUILDING CODE. CARPENTRY A. INSTALLATION OF ALL MATERIALS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE IBC, LOCAL CODES AND MANUFACTURERS, OR AS SPECIFIED ON THE DRAWINGS, WHICHEVER IS MORE STRINGENT. MATERIALS SHALL BE AS SPECIFIED HEREIN. B. VISUALLY GRADED SAWN LUMBER: DOUGLAS FIR -LARCH (DFL), HEM -FIR (HF), SPRUCE -PINE -FIR (SPF), SOUTHERN PINE (SP), WITH GRADING BY ONE OF THE FOLLOWING AGENCIES: WCLIB, NLGA, WWPA, NELMA, NSLB OR SPIB, WITH MINIMUM VALUES PER THE "NATIONAL DESIGN SPECIFICATION FOR WOOD CONSTRUCTION" (NDS). SPECIES AND GRADES AS FOLLOWS, U.N.O.: STUDS: DFL, HF, SPF OR SP, STUD GRADE. JOISTS, HEADERS, PLATES: DFL, HF, SPF OR SP, NO. 2 AND BETTER SILL PLATES: DFL, HF, SPF OR SP, NO. 2 AND BETTER, TREATED. ALL OTHER LUMBER: DFL, HF, SPF OR SP, STANDARD GRADE OR BETTER. C. MACHINE STRESS RATED SAWN LUMBER (MSR), WITH GRADING PERFORMED BY ONE OF THE FOLLOWING AGENCIES: WCLIB, NLGA, WWPA, NELMA OR SPIB, WITH MINIMUM VALUES AS SPECIFIED ON DRAWINGS. D. LAMINATED VENEER LUMBER (LVL): MICROLAM, STRUCLAM OR APPROVED EQUAL WITH MINIMUM VALUES: Fb = 2600 PSI, E = 1.8 MPSI. E. PARALLEL STRAND LUMBER (PSL): PARALLAM OR APPROVED EQUAL WITH MINIMUM VALUES: Fb = 2900 PSI, E = 2.0 MPSI. F. GLULAM: APPROVED PRODUCT MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF ANSI/AITC STANDARD A190.1 "AMERICAN NATIONAL STANDARD FOR STRUCTURAL GLUED LAMINATED TIMBER" WITH MINIMUM VALUES: Fb = 2400 PSI, E = 1.8 MPSI. G. WOOD I -JOIST: WSI, TJI, GPI, STRUCJOIST, AMERICAN I -JOIST OR APPROVED EQUAL. I -JOISTS PROVIDED SHALL HAVE EQUAL OR SUPERIOR STRENGTH TO ANY SIZED JOISTS SPECIFIED. H. PLYWOOD: PS 1 "U.S. PRODUCT STANDARD FOR CONST. AND INDUST. PLYWOOD", OR PS2 "PERFORMANCE STANDARD AND POLICIES FOR STRUCTURAL -USE PANELS", FORM NO. E445, THICKNESS AND GRADE AS SPECIFIED. ROOF AND WALL SHEATHING SHALL BE EXTERIOR GRADE. I. FRAMING ANCHORS: 18 GAGE MINIMUM; KANT-SAG, SIMPSON OR APPROVED EQUAL, U.N.O. J. WOOD PRESERVATIVE: PROVIDE PRESSURE TREATED LUMBER THAT MEETS REQUIREMENTS OF IBC. ALL FASTENERS AND HARDWARE IN CONTACT WITH PRESSURE TREATED LUMBER SHALL BE APPROVED FOR USE WITH THE PRESERVATIVE THAT IS USED. K. ANCHOR BOLTS: ASTM A307 OR ASTM A313. ANCHOR BOLTS SHALL BE INSTALLED PER IBC 2308.6 WITH 1/2" BOLT AT 48" OC UNO. THERE SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF TWO BOLTS PER PIECE WITH ONE BOLT LOCATED NOT MORE THAN 12 INCHES OR LESS THAN 4 INCHES FROM EACH END OF EACH PIECE. AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO 1/2" ANCHOR BOLTS FOR SILL PLATE ANCHORAGE: 1/2"x6" �4 1/2,, EMBED TITEN HD OR REDHEAD LDT CONCRETE SCREWS OR 1/2"x7 4 1/2 EMBED) EXPANSION BOLTS MAY BE USED. L. LAG BOLTS: FF -B-561. M. NAILS: COMMON TO MEET FF -N-105 OR CS -263, GALVANIZED AT EXTERIOR. ALL NAILING SHALL CONFORM TO THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS OF THE NAILING SCHEDULE INDICATED ON IBC TABLE 2304.9.1. N. ALL HANGER HARDWARE TO BE SIMPSON STRONG TIE ANCHOR SYSTEMS OR APPROVED EQUAL. IP. J 20'-6" N J------------- - - - - - - - - - - - - --- J J— — — — — — — — — — — — — - — — — — — ROOF TRUSS SEE PLAN TRUSS BRIG EL.=SEE ARCH W/ ARCH .SIMPSON H2. 5T TRUSS TIE BOTH ENDS EACH TRUSS 2x6 STUD WALL (#2 OR BTR) AT 16" OC CONTINUE WALL SHEATHING TO BOTTOM OF ROOF TRUSS TOP CHORD. EXISTING SEPARATION WALLS PROVIDE (2) 2x4 (#2 OR BTR) STUDS AT 24" O.C. 2x6 R w/1 /4% 4 1/2" SDS SCREWS AT 16" OC PURLINS SEE PLAN AND w/ SIMPSON LU24 OR A34 EXISTING STORAGE BUILDING x 1 1/2" NAILS EA. END 2x 6 PURLINS TOP CHORD TRUSS (2) STUDS (#2 OR BTR) AT 24" O.C. (ONE UNDER TRUSS & ONE ALONG SIDE OF TRUSS (FASTEN TO BOTTOM CHORD TRUSS STEEL w/6d NAILS OR #6 SCREWS AT 24" OC AND TO TRUSS TOP AND BOTTOM CHORD w/(8) 4% 3 SDS OR LEDGER LOK SCREWS EXISTING CONCRETE SLAB FINISHED FLOOR a r EL.= 100'-0" O SECTION 3/8"=1 '-0" rn I LO L 0) N I I Ln 4 IV) N 20'-6" 1(3) 2x10I 1 (3) 2x10 h 1 ROOF TRI SSES AT 24" CUt O 1 _ �--EXISTING ROOF PURLINS AT 24" O.C. GIRDER S TRUS \ III LO -- -- 1 -- Of00 �w `1 — — O O Q ;L ^ - w ? - - - - w 2 0 N — 10 ° cn / cn O o Zt ,,, RIDGE o N o N p D' Q - - \ - - of Q Q a- - - s1 GIRDER TRUSS PROVIDE (2) 2x4 (#2 OR BTR) i/ ROOF TRU;SES I- - - - - STUDS AT 24" O.C. ALIGN WITH AT 24 OC. UNP I � \\ ENTIRE LENGTH OF WALL IN 2> 10 1 1 (3) 2x 10 - - - - - ROOF TRUSS SEE PLAN TRUSS BRIG �EL.=SEE ARCH VERIFY W/ ARCH SIMPSON H2.5T TRUSS TIE BOTH ENDS EACH TRUSS 2x6 STUD (#2 OR BTR) WALL AT 16" OC CONTINUE WALL SHEATHING TO BOTTOM OF ROOF TRUSS TOP CHORD. 'Z` BEVEL BOTTOM TO MATCH SLOPE) WALL AT 16" OC 2x4 BRACE AT 32" OC w/ (2) 12d NAILS TO STUD SIMPSON A34 (2) NEW PURLINS SEE PLAN AND SCHEDULE w/ SIMPSON LU24 OR A34 w/(8) 8dx 1 112" NAILS EA. END TRUSS BRG EL.=SEE ARCH FINISHED FLOOR EL.= 100'-0" r 2 SECTION 3/8"=1 '-0" TRUSS SUPPLIER TO USE CENTER TRUSS/WALL AS BEARING ALIGN WITH OUTSIDE WALL/JAMB (2) NEW PURLINS SEE PLAN AND SCHEDULE w/ SIMPSON LU24 OR A34 w/(8) 8dx 1 1/2" NAILS EA. END EXISTING STORAGE BUILDING 2x 6 PURLINS TOP CHORD TRUSS (2) STUDS (#2 OR BTR) AT 24" O.C. (ONE UNDER TRUSS & ONE ALONG SIDE OF TRUSS (FASTEN TO BOTTOM STEEL w/6d NAILS OR #6 SCREWS CHORD TRUSS AT 24" OC AND TO TRUSS TOP AND BOTTOM CHORD w/(8) 4"x 3 SDS OR LEDGER LOK SCREWS O SECTION EXISTING CONCRETE SLAB FINISHED FLOOR Jr EL. =100'-0" 3/8"= 1'-0" ♦ DUFFY ENGINEERING AND ASSOCIATES, INC. STRUCTURAL EAM/NEERIAM 350 Highway 10 South Saint Cloud, MN 56304 Phone: (320) 259-6575 Fax: (320) 259-6991 ♦Email: mail@duffyeng.com /I hereby certify that this plana specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed ENGINEER under the lows of the state of MINNESOTA. RYAN' ERT P.E. 05-15-18 41971 Dote License No. ♦ I C: O U Q &i z Z o a � o O W O [if Z V) z V) 0 J aQ� U_ J W LL O C O a z Q V) J V) Z c 0 WLL� Z 0 U W O W U ly V) z O O Q V I- W U 3: WOO w Q J Q 0 J O J W � Z ) 0Q � O � z O Z D co 0 V) K) 00, 10 Project No.: 18249 a Date: 05-15-18 Drawn by: GLW Checked by: RS 2 EL 3 O Ci Co Go G7 9 IlmA OD Lori :ES 1y U �O f1n C J P7 \ N I I /so, 0 40 RO 120 1 SCALE IN FEET rA uses EAST LINE OF THE NW 1/4 OF SEC. 14, TWP. 121, RNG. 25 HAVING A BEARING OF NORTH 00'0C'30' WEST IN THE WRIGHT COUNTY COORDINATE SYSTEM. 1A 0 Denotes 0 Inch a H Inch Iran Pipe t/ TIL R Set 80th A Plastic Cap Mm*ed R.L.% Number 71729, unless otherwise ncfed ' • Danotes fret Manument Fetund Denotes o found "t County Section Monumeo t PID q5-300- 423111 QTY Or kwiCELL0 Po lss-m-001.20 \ ARMA PRINK RTY. LLC fl • \ FID ISS -04-01030 4126 1EM0 AVEMS W, ULC LEGAL DESCRIPTION r • � • PID RD. 155-500-142302 Part of tho South HMI of the NatUraet Owl of Seel 14, 70=tIp 131, Rmg4 25 delKel M Whom: Commaneknp al the Pbfthaal uamr d sad sanlh Hair, theMe monq IM 1.116 am of void South hall en on Nomad beer6iq of SOath A9 dpgreep 0/ mlan4es b arms wel 1051111 feet thence South DD degrees 07 miunN n Nwnea Ire.. po ons +fed mal l Eft of add South Hoff, 924.00 feet Dame South 89 degrees 05 rrirwtes 38 !wood. Well parallel to the north Ii" of mid South Ho". 319.14 feel 19 the al pMnl afbggiru thenN aenlinrre South 89 tl 09 minuhh 36 eacands Wash 512.47 loot h the oen8erfifx W Old M•jma la Ifgheey Nn 2�heae slarlh 27 degaes 42 minutes 10 second! East along Gold aerNedire a drlonN of 386.14 reef: ,= Nath 0 degrees 06 r"I"" S9 emanate Eod Parallel to the north Iona of sad South Hod. 333.67 fol; thenw Sadh DO degree. 09 minutes 07 decane. Wal 339.23 seat to the paha of beginning. CW80 fed elde drip of loan in IM South Hof of sire Nartbeeal Oval al Section 14, Tan121r rxbip 121, eiba: Npfrge lglll rxw 25. al nly. Mineeal TM coetedifx e1 held 80 feet aWp is tlesarbM ee Cammene6hp al the nartwcek saaxr al said South NpA; Dana. abnq the north Me N said S"M Holl N an ashamed bearing al Seulh f!9 tlegraee O6 eni IN 31' moal Rest a dldtaMe OF 1058.00 feet uahee south 00 da Sou 07 minora 17 secarde Wal, poraSel frith tx Net !w o1 Nld Swath Hall a 141- W 924.00 het Iherre South fW da9raN O9 mixt. 35 eaaeMs Weal, Parallel' Nth ax arlh >ron al mid South llsll, a ialance of 567,42 leo to the Point el tajm'ng a the 4anter9M b be dwcroOedC Ihence now"., 345,64 !eel Merq to rxntangeetal curve. aaMare to the weal. booing a radon d 1150.00 fol, wnbal angw al 17 agora 13 m,neta 50 e l and the acrd d d lmla hour. Nosh 09 degeses 16 minutes 08 5WMde Ear to a pall on o ins 564.89 hal southerly of and peril Nlh said north SN M the South NOIf and sad crdvine then larminalinp ALSO DICER that part at sad Sadh Hes of the Horthoesl Duertr darcrlbed ea fetaN: camrrarNg at the noraxait saner of mid South Will. there. a" the noon lir of had South Hall an on aesuana brol a SM46 SO dogma 08 rrlierla 36 Seconds West a drtonea 7N, 1 .030' 9UL11N0 SET LN .............. ......••••TOP NUT OF HYDRANT AT THE SOUTHEASTERLY STING STell sul (QUADRANT CF CEDAR STREET AND DUNDAS ROAD. 1ELEVATION=965.01 (NCVD 29). 7 PID 65-500-142302 �' z � $.-ZONING SUMA4AR1(i.EN R. t L®S A. POSUATA , . • i • • • 9 - m ( 3`_' p I w= I EXISTING ZONING OF THIS PROPERTY IS B-3, s 1 I �i i , , P......... _ BItlAINc t�( ( HIGHWAY BUSINESS DELLO ZONING STRICT PER CITY OF f 1 - AND ON THMONTIECCNMlIN1TY DEVELCPMENDATED N PACE OF THES r I ILMSTING STORAZ thsLDNC h� , IUL0a0 I I J .�..... ., - r I CITY OF MONTICELLO WEBSITE. 'NSETBACKSUAINARY'- - t R ! -BLOCK-.;""' -1+»� k , � g PID 155-590-142306 THE BNLDINC REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PER THE - w LCIS A POSUSTA _ �, I CITY OF MONTICELLD CITY CODE CHAPTER 3 'B-3' f - 6 I HIGHWAY BUSINESS DISTRICT ARE AS FOLLOWS: !... .....1.. 7 ...........................• FRONT 30 FT t i! Ee+sng. c f ENstwO i I SIDE - 10 FT GRACE f REAR - 30 FT . !LOT a ... , V . I �T�°:� I "MESUMMARY, .......... . ./. ...... r./...... ...... ..... ... .y- s! \ f .l •� EMSTM STaRA4E 91e1Aw0 EXISTING - OuLm E \ 1 I 3 - __.-�- w+s A WIN 11111,11111111111111116f ffamool4re 206.13 fi00�4TNr 319.14 r 1 - (569'WMW W Deady i LINE PARALLEL 90TH THE H LINE PID IIS -MID -Mill .. \ OF THE S 1/2 OF THE NW I/4 JON M • MARY E LM10s7EN of 1066.00 feet thea. Sodb 00 depreea 07 'nutty 17 sewnds West par l vith the "A inn of acid South Half a distance of 924.0D UNI: Normo Stith 89 tlegfi m 08 minutes 38 swirl Wool parallel eilh the north k A M said South Hall o dialance of 11131,61 hal to the Cenlerine M Ole Minn aMo mar Nb. 25 (afro kaon N Cedar Strealr Iheaw North 27 daprw manatee ma10 seconds East. a" wild caMerEM, a dist of 386.16 fm to the Pehhl al 1111 nIng OF the parcel to be dmoriba; sell North .hd0 aagraa he 'ulna 31 oards Ent, PrrfeNth l Ur nrM l , line add Salah Nell, a dfehr,w a 100.13 Ise1 to a pmt on IM eahrly lir of Vw herahh dmoill 16 loot slap; then. Nuthary 53.45 feel aluq o nenlageeGel euX ee sold weshAy NM, cmlcxx to the Wql. IWO" a ares or It 1p. South Ol I qle of Ol degaN 43 aaoragNee 35 aecands, W me chard of said corm tvere degrees 34 miMes 16 s l West fade weal" 107.60 feel along a nanhnio16a1 extra eancOae b to narlh, fearing 4 radhx at 7110.00 het, a central anile of 07 aegrsa 46 miwMs 73 aSwnOs West o a poll the esnMdim, or said atl lfarlNab Isgkwoly No. 25; thence North 27 laL grem 42 fr oul 10 sal Ea.bop said seeler►w. o dlManee of 14.05 loft to Iles paid a1 boglk g. PID NO. IWWD-142315 Thai pmt of the Seulheal quarter of Iles Nort ool aumler or Section 14, ToonIaNp 121, Range 25, Wright Caned,. Minrreata deuri ted a Falb..: The a Wy 33.00 feet of Deal Park N Cedar Sleet (old Slate Hgheey Ne. 25) being 16.00 feet :n Wf NOM Eee I1o1111e1y al New Slate Tell Hialrage N. 25 and Souurery of o Fa anon pnralNs w0h and dahN 40m Feel Stn lwrly at the hNaeig described ion: Ca'remrroieg at the NalhNsl career of the South Hull of weld MethanolQuarter.thenceSouth89 degraeh 00 minutes 47 award, wind, NaumW leorknp =the North ion of said South NON r the Npthewst Owner, a distal of 1f166.00 INt IMnw South 0D dogress O0 naft 3D mcade Fast. parallel Nth the Eclat OM of said South hew ,M the Nwlhwrt auala, e the drlanee or 554.77 feel to it. iMWMIk. 16th a Tree d- Parallel Ilh and shlom 564.19 1-1 South OF said Nathins thence Said 89 dapea ras 0o Intel 47 sprll Wast. WI add gal described parallelane a sate- b 426.09 Int. to Un paint of beginning M said DN to he �►0 Allit►rfs ,41 qo. so_y,►als herdi lhM dsr0ad; thence Westerly and Norlinewatertf a dial of 31344 feet, long a tMgenhal aures wnGaoe to the North, bows a radius of 750.00 feel and a =onkel angle of 24 aegrses 1g minula 37 meonds, and fond 9th there trmiMlNq, AND That Pmt d the Sae1h.al 0-ren,alh a1 the Nwest Q-A. of Sntion 14, Towl 121. It". 25, Wfight Canes,, AIwnNoto. rfEeh fee Eeehrty and Northerly of New Blah Tnxnh H'ghroy No. 25. Wwdefy of Cedar Sheol !IXd Slone Truck Hiplwey Itp 25) and Sol of a fine dre- paralM vilh aid delanl 40.06 feet southerly of the Wowing described 9na: Co- clea al the NaMaeel cemrer of lief SOath 11,11 al veld NPrthrest Qua it therxe South ✓S9 de .. 00 minutes 47 Ncald. WNI...ad baring, .1l the North Ena of void Sanlh NON al the MOMwNt Wallah, a dtataxa d 1056.Op fid: Grnw SouM O0 dapnee 00 miriulN 30 eacwnl Eee1 Parallel vim the Ecaf IUM al odd Sal !qty el the Northwest 0Ia all of 554.77 UNI m Xe Inlraastfsn 111hm h a Sao draParallel vvith a It.. draw ponal with aha distant 51CSS feel South at eek North Ibre; thNN South M degrea� 00 mldNes 47 aeeorhl Icer, alert void lost tlaNribad PamON ins. a dislanee of 42609 Nook, W the pint of beginnup of cad ion to be hereifwllr daaerlbed; khenee wafer, a dislanto of ?,54,55 feel Mona c IrpanHol wree conmre to Ins NOrlh hauhq a redue al 750.00 UNI entl a con" anvils cl 19 degrees 26 minces 47 Neaode b a pall h be berabwtr refomed m N Point 'A'; thence wouraihq Was" and Narll-tertY a diaSorce of 53A9 het, along SolIpp Sold antal .ores t-- I- the North. Iwdnq a rads d iu75D.00 real and a all angle a1 04 daprea 52 mheN 50 momals and eek IiM (here Iarmimiklg. EN.pl lhaL Part r laid Saw'...' Ouarlr of the Northeast Quasar which ;fes Noriname ry of the fYaaeleg dNrAN lila: fieginni.q at the wawa hlemam P01n17A'. Moral South fee degrees 48 minutn 03 aewnl WI . dg111 al 0.00 fee10l end esld ion then hrm6eling. LOT I, BLOCK 1 77.823 sil OR 1.79 acres LOT I, BLOCK 2 58,144 sq.ft. OR 1.33 ones TOTAL AREA 135.967 aq.ft. OA 3.12 acres NOTES I. ORIENTATION OF THIS BEARING SYSTEM IS BASED ON THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP121, RANGE 25 HAVING A BEARING OF NORTH 00'00'30" WEST. 2. UTILITY INFORMATION PER WSB RECORD DRAWINGS DATED 3/24/03 AND 1/31/02 AND ALSO PER OSM ,lt ASSOCIATES, INC. AS -BUILT DRAWINGS DATED MAY 1980. 3. ACCORDING TO THE SOIL SURVEY OF WRIGHT COUNTY, THE SOIL WITHIN THE PROPOSED PLAT IS 406 -DORSET SANDY LOAM, O TO 2 PERCENT SLOPES. .,., . Cut P11 I ME COR OF THE s 1/2 aF THE Denel Existing Avers Pcle mc(- Denotes Exfsthp Guy Anchor -.' Denotes Exisfft nag Pole NN 1/4 SEC T ."R `\ Dandles EWAtfng Sanitary CF. Coli _ 'mm' -Denotes Edstarg Bun'ed Cos Almkr DenatessrExisfhp Wafer h'ydralf ( 5wQO'47'W 1056.00 QN Me Z.1 • �� Denofes refre lg Fiber wl Maid er I (SB9e0613B'W Geed? cl PEs Z el" Dsnates £xfaffng Traffic Sign ,r, 7q -LT. POLL? Omafes E+istllg Light Pde Peet Dmates Existing Corals Ties 1e16 LIE 13F THE 4 _ i f 1 I Donates Existing Wafrradn W � -• 1/2 OF M New 1/ f Denotes Edstlag Overhead EMeffie Line ---�----= Donates EWON62 Cmerete Wag .�.. Donates Existing rnfwmegl'oh Ctnfow Lber "'.. • " p t Dred &*N -g 41dex Co itaw Line Danetea Existing Mumdnarrs Surisae I ( I I -DEVELOPER & OWNER ' PC66_3ao-fa23D3 a7r OF Mr1NncEUD ( ` ^) AMAX SELF STORAGE, LLC EN $SROAD E 36 DUNNDDt PO BOX 1288 ( MONTICELLO. MN 55362 I PH. (763)295-3152 s� mamma ^SURVEYORS & ENGINEERS 0 Yti~ MITA _� 17j) JOHN OLIVER k ASSOCIATES, INC. 580 DODGE AVENUE 1 T" •� �A' i V I ELN RIVER, MN 55330 PH. Iffle ,� ''��( (763)44F-2072 e1@TOTAL PROPERTYAREA _...._ .^T _._'._ d(d@30 �.", `.- • W91G� h` Can t Wad T `silsaa..; atT I 135,967 SO. FT DR 3.12 ACRES 7N, 1 .030' 9UL11N0 SET LN .............. ......••••TOP NUT OF HYDRANT AT THE SOUTHEASTERLY STING STell sul (QUADRANT CF CEDAR STREET AND DUNDAS ROAD. 1ELEVATION=965.01 (NCVD 29). 7 PID 65-500-142302 �' z � $.-ZONING SUMA4AR1(i.EN R. t L®S A. POSUATA , . • i • • • 9 - m ( 3`_' p I w= I EXISTING ZONING OF THIS PROPERTY IS B-3, s 1 I �i i , , P......... _ BItlAINc t�( ( HIGHWAY BUSINESS DELLO ZONING STRICT PER CITY OF f 1 - AND ON THMONTIECCNMlIN1TY DEVELCPMENDATED N PACE OF THES r I ILMSTING STORAZ thsLDNC h� , IUL0a0 I I J .�..... ., - r I CITY OF MONTICELLO WEBSITE. 'NSETBACKSUAINARY'- - t R ! -BLOCK-.;""' -1+»� k , � g PID 155-590-142306 THE BNLDINC REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PER THE - w LCIS A POSUSTA _ �, I CITY OF MONTICELLD CITY CODE CHAPTER 3 'B-3' f - 6 I HIGHWAY BUSINESS DISTRICT ARE AS FOLLOWS: !... .....1.. 7 ...........................• FRONT 30 FT t i! Ee+sng. c f ENstwO i I SIDE - 10 FT GRACE f REAR - 30 FT . !LOT a ... , V . I �T�°:� I "MESUMMARY, .......... . ./. ...... r./...... ...... ..... ... .y- s! \ f .l •� EMSTM STaRA4E 91e1Aw0 EXISTING - OuLm E \ 1 I 3 - __.-�- w+s A WIN 11111,11111111111111116f ffamool4re 206.13 fi00�4TNr 319.14 r 1 - (569'WMW W Deady i LINE PARALLEL 90TH THE H LINE PID IIS -MID -Mill .. \ OF THE S 1/2 OF THE NW I/4 JON M • MARY E LM10s7EN of 1066.00 feet thea. Sodb 00 depreea 07 'nutty 17 sewnds West par l vith the "A inn of acid South Half a distance of 924.0D UNI: Normo Stith 89 tlegfi m 08 minutes 38 swirl Wool parallel eilh the north k A M said South Hall o dialance of 11131,61 hal to the Cenlerine M Ole Minn aMo mar Nb. 25 (afro kaon N Cedar Strealr Iheaw North 27 daprw manatee ma10 seconds East. a" wild caMerEM, a dist of 386.16 fm to the Pehhl al 1111 nIng OF the parcel to be dmoriba; sell North .hd0 aagraa he 'ulna 31 oards Ent, PrrfeNth l Ur nrM l , line add Salah Nell, a dfehr,w a 100.13 Ise1 to a pmt on IM eahrly lir of Vw herahh dmoill 16 loot slap; then. Nuthary 53.45 feel aluq o nenlageeGel euX ee sold weshAy NM, cmlcxx to the Wql. IWO" a ares or It 1p. South Ol I qle of Ol degaN 43 aaoragNee 35 aecands, W me chard of said corm tvere degrees 34 miMes 16 s l West fade weal" 107.60 feel along a nanhnio16a1 extra eancOae b to narlh, fearing 4 radhx at 7110.00 het, a central anile of 07 aegrsa 46 miwMs 73 aSwnOs West o a poll the esnMdim, or said atl lfarlNab Isgkwoly No. 25; thence North 27 laL grem 42 fr oul 10 sal Ea.bop said seeler►w. o dlManee of 14.05 loft to Iles paid a1 boglk g. PID NO. IWWD-142315 Thai pmt of the Seulheal quarter of Iles Nort ool aumler or Section 14, ToonIaNp 121, Range 25, Wright Caned,. Minrreata deuri ted a Falb..: The a Wy 33.00 feet of Deal Park N Cedar Sleet (old Slate Hgheey Ne. 25) being 16.00 feet :n Wf NOM Eee I1o1111e1y al New Slate Tell Hialrage N. 25 and Souurery of o Fa anon pnralNs w0h and dahN 40m Feel Stn lwrly at the hNaeig described ion: Ca'remrroieg at the NalhNsl career of the South Hull of weld MethanolQuarter.thenceSouth89 degraeh 00 minutes 47 award, wind, NaumW leorknp =the North ion of said South NON r the Npthewst Owner, a distal of 1f166.00 INt IMnw South 0D dogress O0 naft 3D mcade Fast. parallel Nth the Eclat OM of said South hew ,M the Nwlhwrt auala, e the drlanee or 554.77 feel to it. iMWMIk. 16th a Tree d- Parallel Ilh and shlom 564.19 1-1 South OF said Nathins thence Said 89 dapea ras 0o Intel 47 sprll Wast. WI add gal described parallelane a sate- b 426.09 Int. to Un paint of beginning M said DN to he �►0 Allit►rfs ,41 qo. so_y,►als herdi lhM dsr0ad; thence Westerly and Norlinewatertf a dial of 31344 feet, long a tMgenhal aures wnGaoe to the North, bows a radius of 750.00 feel and a =onkel angle of 24 aegrses 1g minula 37 meonds, and fond 9th there trmiMlNq, AND That Pmt d the Sae1h.al 0-ren,alh a1 the Nwest Q-A. of Sntion 14, Towl 121. It". 25, Wfight Canes,, AIwnNoto. rfEeh fee Eeehrty and Northerly of New Blah Tnxnh H'ghroy No. 25. Wwdefy of Cedar Sheol !IXd Slone Truck Hiplwey Itp 25) and Sol of a fine dre- paralM vilh aid delanl 40.06 feet southerly of the Wowing described 9na: Co- clea al the NaMaeel cemrer of lief SOath 11,11 al veld NPrthrest Qua it therxe South ✓S9 de .. 00 minutes 47 Ncald. WNI...ad baring, .1l the North Ena of void Sanlh NON al the MOMwNt Wallah, a dtataxa d 1056.Op fid: Grnw SouM O0 dapnee 00 miriulN 30 eacwnl Eee1 Parallel vim the Ecaf IUM al odd Sal !qty el the Northwest 0Ia all of 554.77 UNI m Xe Inlraastfsn 111hm h a Sao draParallel vvith a It.. draw ponal with aha distant 51CSS feel South at eek North Ibre; thNN South M degrea� 00 mldNes 47 aeeorhl Icer, alert void lost tlaNribad PamON ins. a dislanee of 42609 Nook, W the pint of beginnup of cad ion to be hereifwllr daaerlbed; khenee wafer, a dislanto of ?,54,55 feel Mona c IrpanHol wree conmre to Ins NOrlh hauhq a redue al 750.00 UNI entl a con" anvils cl 19 degrees 26 minces 47 Neaode b a pall h be berabwtr refomed m N Point 'A'; thence wouraihq Was" and Narll-tertY a diaSorce of 53A9 het, along SolIpp Sold antal .ores t-- I- the North. Iwdnq a rads d iu75D.00 real and a all angle a1 04 daprea 52 mheN 50 momals and eek IiM (here Iarmimiklg. EN.pl lhaL Part r laid Saw'...' Ouarlr of the Northeast Quasar which ;fes Noriname ry of the fYaaeleg dNrAN lila: fieginni.q at the wawa hlemam P01n17A'. Moral South fee degrees 48 minutn 03 aewnl WI . dg111 al 0.00 fee10l end esld ion then hrm6eling. LOT I, BLOCK 1 77.823 sil OR 1.79 acres LOT I, BLOCK 2 58,144 sq.ft. OR 1.33 ones TOTAL AREA 135.967 aq.ft. OA 3.12 acres NOTES I. ORIENTATION OF THIS BEARING SYSTEM IS BASED ON THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP121, RANGE 25 HAVING A BEARING OF NORTH 00'00'30" WEST. 2. UTILITY INFORMATION PER WSB RECORD DRAWINGS DATED 3/24/03 AND 1/31/02 AND ALSO PER OSM ,lt ASSOCIATES, INC. AS -BUILT DRAWINGS DATED MAY 1980. 3. ACCORDING TO THE SOIL SURVEY OF WRIGHT COUNTY, THE SOIL WITHIN THE PROPOSED PLAT IS 406 -DORSET SANDY LOAM, O TO 2 PERCENT SLOPES. .,., . Cut P11 Donates Ectsteng Sl Sell, DrrT1 Sawn MnnhaH e Denel Existing Avers Pcle mc(- Denotes Exfsthp Guy Anchor -.' Denotes Exisfft nag Pole .SIM ea Dandles EWAtfng Sanitary CF. Coli _ 'mm' -Denotes Edstarg Bun'ed Cos Almkr DenatessrExisfhp Wafer h'ydralf Cd Denotes Existing Wats III QN Osnates £dsting sanftary Seer Mathdo, • �� Denofes refre lg Fiber wl Maid er phe Donates Exbfhg Rmald Catch Boon cl PEs DVn0fm Existing relephdie Pedestal el" Dsnates £xfaffng Traffic Sign ,r, 7q -LT. POLL? Omafes E+istllg Light Pde Peet Dmates Existing Corals Ties 1e16 Denotes Extral Deddi,"s rrae --' Donates Existing Wafrradn Denotes Existing Sowtory 5e111 -• Donates; Existing Storm Sewer --ee- Denotes Edstlag Overhead EMeffie Line ---�----= Donates EWON62 Cmerete Wag .�.. Donates Existing rnfwmegl'oh Ctnfow Lber "'.. • " p t Dred &*N -g 41dex Co itaw Line Danetea Existing Mumdnarrs Surisae -SHEET NO. /I 4.5(J): District Regulations (Signs) 4.8(F)(2)(c): Residential District Garage Requirements 4.11(C): Residential District Requirements (R-1 District) 5.1: Use Table (Table 5-1: Uses by District) 8.4: Definitions 7. Regular Agenda: A. Consideration of approving an amendment to Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development for an outdoor storage accessory use for Lot 1, Block 2, AMAX Addition (36 Dundas Road). AnDlicant: AMAX Self Storage Steve Grittman summarized this item for an amendment to CUP for PUD for outdoor storage accessory use for AMAX Self Storage. Steve Grittman described the proposed placement of temporary storage units and noted that would require a CUP amendment. Some grading will be done to the property to accommodate a retaining wall. The temporary storage units would be located immediately adjacent to the retaining wall. The existing code does have setback requirements; however, these are not permanent structures so it is felt that a zero setback could be considered. An encroachment agreement would be required either way. Steve Grittman review the zoning ordinance in respect to outdoor storage requirements. Steve Grittman noted the Planning Commission recommends an interim use permit under PUD for a period of five years. The original staff recommendation was for a period of ten years. Basically, the decision for Council involves consideration of the length of the term for the use and setback requirements. There was some discussion by Council about a zero setback versus a 6 -ft setback. Brian Stumpf questioned whether any landscaping is required. Lloyd Hilgart brought up the guidelines for accessory outdoor storage which would require screening; Steve Grittman explained that screening would normally be required but is flexed with the PUD. Brian Stumpf questioned if the screening would be required when the land to the south is developed. Steve Grittman indicated that would be dependent on the nature of the development to the south. The term of five years versus ten years was discussed and consensus was that either could work. Tom Perrault stated he would prefer five years for the interim use. Brian Stumpf indicated that he was fine with ten years noting that Glen Posusta has been conducting business for many years and doesn't anticipate any significant changes in the next ten years. BRIAN STUMPF MOVED FOR ALTERNATIVE #2 APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE AMAX STORAGE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT BASED ON FINDINGS IN PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION #2014-060, AND SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS IN EXHIBIT Z, WITH MODIFICATIONS (A) AND (B) AS FOLLOWS. LLOYD HILGART SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION City Council Minutes —June 9, 2014 Page 5 CARRIED 3-1 TOM PERRAULT VOTING IN OPPOSITION. Glen Posusta abstained as he owns this property. (A) Consistency with staff recommendation for a 10 -year interim use under PUD. (B) Removal of the condition relating to 6 -ft setback, as the units are considered accessory outdoor storage, which may be directly adjacent to the property line. EXHIBIT Z • The amendment shall be treated as an interim use under the existingplanned unit development for a period not to exceed ten (10) years, after which the site will require a new amendment, and be returned to a condition in compliance with all applicable zoning regulations in effect at that time. Planning Commission recommends a period of five (5) years for the interim use under planned unit development. • The applicant shall mark and submit drainage and stormwater plans identifying catch basin elevations and drainage patterns, in accordance with the requirements of the City Engineer. • If the area designated for temporary storage units is vacant for a period of at least twelve months, the amendment shall expire, and the property be returned to a surface in accordance with zoning regulations. • No active business or other occupancy may be made of the temporary storage buildings, with the exception of storage, and loading or unloading of said storage. • The applicant shall verify the type and material of the current surfacing for the outdoor storage area. The material shall be sufficient to control dust. During the Planning Commission meeting, the applicant verified that the surface would be gravel sufficient to control dust. • The applicant shall enter into an encroachment agreement as related to the retaining wall and placement of outdoor storage within the existing southern drainage and utility easement. The proposed storage units shall remain 6' from the property line. For outdoor storage accessory use, no setback would be required. Council may wish to modify this condition accordingly. An encroachment agreement would still be required. • The applicant shall enter into a development agreement with the City specifying the terms of the PUD, including the termination date as agreed to by the City Council. B. Consideration of adontin2 Resolution #2014-062 aDBrovine an amendment to the Monticello Comprehensive Plan to reauide land use from "Places to Shoo" to "Places to Live" for Outlot A. Monticello Commerce Center 7t' Addition (PID 155196000010). ADnlicant: Citv of Monticello Steve Grittman presented this item with a review of the subject property and request for a comp plan amendment for land use designation as "Places to Live." The current zoning designation is B-4 (Regional Business District) and the intention would be to request rezoning to an R-4 (High Density Residence City Council Minutes —June 9, 2014 Page 6 Legislative Update 6/13/2018 This week, Congress is considering over 50 bills to address and combat addition and the opioid crisis. Last week, Congressman Emmer sent a letter in support of the Wright County Drug Court Program. • The House Commerce, Justice, and Science Appropriations Subcommittee approved their FY19 appropriations bill (another one of the 12) which included $75 million for the drug courts program, on par with its FY 18 appropriation. Last week, the Congressman hosted the first installment of his Young Women's Leadership Program. Last week, the House adopted (and Congressman Emmer supported) three of the 12 annual appropriations bills (the Military Construction and Veterans Affairs Appropriations Act, the Energy and Water Appropriations Act, and the Legislative Branch Appropriations Act) • This started an important, annual process that must be complete by the end of the fiscal year (end of Sept.) • The bills included $10.3 billion for military construction to house military families, and fund Guard and Reserve construction projects; o $9 million in funding for a small arms range near MSP for the MN Air Force Reserve; and o $85.3 billion in discretionary funding for VA programs, $3.9 billion above FYI 8, including VA Medical Care, processing disability claims, VA construction, and the new VA electronic health record system. The House Financial Services Committee adopted Congressman Emmer's Main Street Growth Act by a 56-0 vote. The bill will establish a specialized securities exchange for small companies that are interested in going public but may not be able to compete just yet on the major exchanges like NASDAQ or NYSE. • The Committee has marked up over 100 bills this Congress, making it one of the most active. • TE also wrote two sections of the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act, S. 2155, which was signed into law last month by the President. • These provisions were specifically focused on alleviating regulatory burdens for small community banks and credit unions and were supported by entities like the MN Credit Union Association and the MN Bankers Assn. The 2018 Farm Bill failed to pass in the House last month, despite Congressman Emmer's support. A fight on immigration sidelined the bill but we are expected to reconsider it next week. • The Senate is marking up their version of the bill this week, so there is a good chance we will go to conference to reconcile the differences between both bills before August. • Both the House and Senate bill include the Congressman's language to address issues related to farmer mental health and suicide. o Farmers have the highest rate of suicide of aU profession (even more then veterans, dentists, etc.) o While that stat is not meant to make it seem like a competition, it should serve as a wake-up call for many that our Ag community is not receiving the attention and resources they need to address this problem, especially in a depressed farm economy. We still do not have a definitive timeline for when we will see a surface transportation authorization bill in Congress. • (I encourage you to contact our office if we may be of assistance w/ letters of support for any federal transportation grant applications you submit) • The deadline to submit an application for the FY 2018 BUILD Transportation Discretionary Grants program is July 19, 2018. o BUILD Transportation grants replace the pre-existing Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery (TIGER) grant program. Next week, the President will be in Minnesota (Duluth) for a rally. We're hopeful he will highlight some of Congressman Emmer's work on mining and cancel a barrage of last minute actions by the Obama Administration that puts MN jobs and revenue on the line. Monticello Council Connection June 25, 2018 CITY OF Montieffo DMV May 2018, the DMV processed 13,096 transactions 5,473 more than May 2017. DMV year-to-date revenue is $311,497.49 an increase of $27,822.26 or 9.8% over the same period last year. Please see the following graphs for more detail. $70,000 $60,000 $50,000 $40,000 $30,000 $20,000 $10,000 14,000 12,000 10,000 8,000 6,000 4,000 2,000 $350,000 $300,000 $250,000 $200,000 $150,000 $100,000 $50,000 $- 60,000 50,000 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 DMV Revenue Comparison $61,440 May 2011 May 2012 May 2013 May 2014 May 2015 May 2016 May 2017 May 2018 DMV Transaction Comparison 3,33 May 2011 May 2012 May 2013 May 2014 May 2015 May 2016 May 2017 May 2018 DMV Year -to -Date Revenue Comparison $311,497 May 2011 May 2012 May 2013 May 2014 May 2015 May 2016 May 2017 May 2018 DMV Year -to -Date Transaction Comparison 54,332 May 2011 May 2012 May 2013 May 2014 May 2015 May 2016 May 2017 May 2018 OF M04ieff( COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Attended Rotary Club Meeting - April 23, 2018 Attended Rotary Club Meeting - April 30, 2018 Meeting with Development Prospect - May 2, 2018 Attended Rotary Club Meeting - May 7, 2018 Participated Rotary Sponsored Tree Planting Project at Otter Creek Business Park Trail -Pathway ($4,000 donation to City) - May 11, 2018 Attended Rotary Club Meeting - May 14, 2018 Meeting with Industrial Prospect - May 15, 2018 Attended Chamber of Commerce Meeting - May 15, 2018 Attended Rotary Club Meeting - June 4, 2018 Attended Rotary Club Meeting - June 11, 2018 Attended Rotary Club Meeting - June 18, 2018 Update of EDA Property Demolitions in 2018 Properties/Parcels Purpose of Acquisition 255 East Broadway Hazardous Material Survey completed. Bids being sought for Removal of Hazardous Waste; Fire Training Burn Demo -Clean Up and Straight Out Demolition. EDA to review in July 103 Pine Street Waiting for tenants to vacate and developer proposal prior to commencing demolition activities 112 West River Street Waiting for tenants to vacate in early 2019 and for developer proposal prior to commencing demolition activities ok ow 4 - Ml -- / • ` �� * � _ ' Hyl ` r { 5 - r r- Bare Root Trees White Pine Trees Planted Trail Entrance with Temp Sign Temp Sign 13ERTRAM TRAIL PLANTING TREES DOHMEB BY . vl� r • Nam.• The Crew I M04CH Y OF icello HI -WAY LIQUORS Sales through May 31, 2018 Attached is the data for total sales in each major category through the end of May 2018. Hi -Way Liquors Sales Report 5/31/2018 Total Sales Month 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 CYM-LYM Jan $ 249,670.43 $ 316,280.10 $ 300,631.85 $ 296,838.64 $ 302,114.52 $ 328,004.13 $ 355,029.76 $ 380,425.45 $ 364,675.32 $ 356,295.18 $ 403,520.92 13.3% Feb 255,440.36 284,988.38 285,584.50 315,239.00 307,385.41 337,923.99 333,487.18 347,777.77 362,746.98 364,836.39 390,050.52 6.9% Mar 295,257.14 318,050.39 324,062.21 335,032.60 388,195.21 408,071.17 377,391.62 388,003.16 401,256.91 417,005.50 473,811.33 13.6% Apr 281,365.81 346,738.34 369,112.88 389,543.24 347,321.09 388,395.50 389,250.82 421,280.89 428,729.44 448,141.63 467,192.12 4.3% May 377,177.10 384,337.08 399,489.67 409,309.12 433,829.01 436,195.21 498,095.67 523,401.05 482,917.95 503,867.81 549,206.70 9.0% Jun 350,727.93 381,782.23 377,458.15 409,726.07 461,423.68 440,255.04 426,392.73 474,203.81 470,585.33 521,559.76 - Jul 409,870.50 430,838.23 466,122.69 466,738.15 447,452.18 485,459.76 479,174.06 542,973.27 527,519.46 563,935.31 Aug 409,575.96 383,523.07 386,245.30 408,734.83 445,158.94 503,181.84 484,955.71 470,505.22 462,669.36 497,201.21 Sep 317,846.07 346,900.80 346,557.62 373,719.64 390,399.33 379,381.19 397,495.82 439,444.29 448,218.93 501,126.67 Oct 351,268.98 360,742.04 375,367.40 365,702.14 372,676.23 396,328.87 409,967.74 460,096.82 454,442.30 461,549.38 Nov 332,605.88 341,875.49 360,661.96 376,855.40 421,960.12 424,038.37 465,299.53 474,241.74 444,533.08 495,519.24 Dec 436,379.03 454,982.63 485,617.01 505,482.70 527,865.36 518,379.58 549,200.76 569,707.38 605,509.16 629,143.57 Total $ 4,067,185.19 $ 4,351,038.78 $ 4,476,911.24 $ 4,652,921.53 $ 4,845,781.08 $ 5,045,614.65 $ 5,165,741.40 $ 5,492,060.85 $ 5,453,804.22 $ 5,760,181.65 $ 2,283,781.59 Change $ 283,853.59 $ 125,872.46 $ 176,010.29 $ 192,859.55 $ 199,833.57 $ 120,126.75 $ 326,319.45 $ (38,256.63) $ 306,377.43 $ (3,476,400.06) Change % 7.0% 2.9% 3.9% 4.1% 4.1% 2.4% 6.3% -0.7% 5.6% -60.4% $700,000 $600,000 $500,000 $400,000 $300,000 — $200,000 $100,000 $- Monthly Hi -Way Sales Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug [-11 Sep Oct Nov Dec ■ 2008 ■ 2009 ■ 2010 ■ 2011 ■ 2012 ■ 2013 ■ 2014 ■ 2015 ■ 2017 ■ 2018 Y -T -D 13.3% 10.0% 11.4% 9.3% 9.3% Hi -Way Liquors Sales Report 5/31/2018 Beer Month 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 CYM-LYM Jan $ 122,218.36 $ 157,849.78 $ 146,246.32 $ 143,906.08 $ 149,406.45 $ 160,903.32 $ 173,814.13 $ 191,370.26 $ 176,483.68 $ 174,846.99 $ 198,202.11 13.4% Feb 121,734.33 137,055.23 140,624.54 150,075.08 150,589.28 162,865.75 161,168.63 164,508.11 175,055.27 179,346.12 187,042.58 4.3% Mar 138,889.05 155,196.13 164,157.70 163,595.55 203,957.25 192,607.52 185,325.68 192,955.79 199,141.66 208,926.70 233,971.24 12.0% Apr 146,613.65 178,834.20 189,978.23 194,504.16 179,486.77 186,134.31 198,195.77 219,756.39 228,133.10 234,069.51 224,348.27 -4.2% May 201,232.14 210,097.48 223,678.47 208,963.65 227,664.73 234,738.30 256,188.77 259,306.91 250,403.11 262,275.25 306,245.55 16.8% Jun 193,801.97 207,793.83 206,043.42 224,769.03 259,671.21 243,389.79 238,322.11 263,421.95 263,264.15 296,531.85 - Jul 226,317.96 229,199.79 260,971.50 258,734.60 253,648.64 273,319.54 265,555.32 301,867.65 296,513.68 315,848.83 Aug 226,653.65 203,222.86 211,996.32 216,546.53 242,179.20 281,577.25 267,802.95 253,141.21 250,255.41 268,173.42 Sep 166,679.60 183,586.32 183,865.70 199,170.24 208,974.88 202,213.80 211,854.94 233,215.56 238,333.55 270,898.13 Oct 176,382.34 179,873.10 190,893.27 180,043.06 187,386.57 191,764.20 210,454.13 234,882.09 224,253.93 228,484.62 Nov 158,322.50 154,584.13 168,265.14 171,866.27 195,276.37 192,162.71 202,081.91 207,055.40 213,333.23 222,993.99 Dec 187,691.06 190,655.19 203,080.13 216,560.71 224,952.83 217,491.21 234,178.12 241,996.27 253,223.11 271,457.72 Total $ 2,066,536.61 $ 2,187,948.04 $ 2,289,800.74 $ 2,328,734.96 $ 2,483,194.18 $ 2,539,167.70 $ 2,604,942.46 $ 2,763,477.59 $ 2,768,393.88 $ 2,933,853.13 $ 1,149,809.75 Change $ 121,411.43 $ 101,852.70 $ 38,934.22 $ 154,459.22 $ 55,973.52 $ 65,774.76 $ 158,535.13 $ 4,916.29 $ 165,459.25 $ (1,784,043.38) Change % 5.9% 4.7% 1.7% 6.6% 2.3% 2.6% 6.1% 0.2% 6.0% -60.8% $350,000 $300,000 $250,000 $200,000 — $150,000 $100,000 $50,000 $- Jan Feb Mar Apr Monthly Beer Sales May Jun ■ 2008 ■ 2009 ■ 2010 ■ 2011 ■ 2012 ■ 2013 ■ 2014 ■ 2015 ■ 2017 Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 02018 Y -T -D 13.4% 8.8% 10.0% 5.8% 8.5% Hi -Way Liquors Sales Report 5/31/2018 Liquor Month 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 CYM-LYM Jan $ 73,930.87 $ 92,370.42 $ 91,472.50 $ 91,279.01 $ 93,085.69 $ 103,977.89 $ 113,943.25 $ 118,577.85 $ 118,211.20 $ 114,509.99 $ 133,589.33 16.7% Feb 74,261.89 83,513.27 85,484.92 96,541.21 92,489.93 106,387.16 107,609.55 112,198.85 113,060.59 117,361.15 128,952.50 9.9% Mar 78,870.42 88,569.65 93,133.42 101,047.04 112,244.43 124,487.55 116,316.49 118,269.49 118,839.79 131,238.09 151,716.52 15.6% Apr 76,735.80 90,627.19 95,025.54 110,898.81 98,080.67 113,594.37 115,579.47 123,841.34 126,073.89 130,114.53 136,883.13 5.2% May 103,409.29 102,041.75 106,395.62 111,586.59 114,299.35 127,622.31 135,370.38 140,116.66 129,009.36 142,237.28 160,936.65 13.1% Jun 91,805.81 103,580.02 102,086.20 115,136.72 128,604.32 124,019.90 120,291.71 136,716.81 135,763.26 147,813.59 - Jul 105,782.85 118,883.98 122,861.98 130,624.19 123,672.73 139,270.04 139,967.77 155,436.54 150,173.35 160,220.37 Aug 106,489.25 103,977.01 101,487.43 113,869.37 126,065.14 141,197.73 138,660.76 136,440.40 135,841.14 144,263.78 Sep 88,448.34 94,335.50 94,528.17 103,373.64 109,153.56 107,605.71 115,119.19 129,195.42 130,101.01 143,252.37 Oct 97,046.60 102,236.90 102,983.14 103,533.14 106,326.73 116,677.74 124,271.15 140,198.97 128,290.50 145,864.34 Nov 97,348.39 90,996.73 102,298.02 105,501.75 120,127.29 126,412.24 134,241.85 132,261.11 134,208.12 149,468.96 Dec 135,221.23 143,684.12 153,690.60 159,717.50 172,370.96 175,523.36 184,746.26 190,944.24 205,335.83 213,217.73 - Total $ 1,129,350.74 $ 1,214,816.54 $ 1,251,447.54 $ 1,343,108.97 $ 1,396,520.80 $ 1,506,776.00 $ 1,546,117.83 $ 1,634,197.68 $ 1,624,908.04 $ 1,739,562.18 $ 712,078.13 Change $ 85,465.80 $ 36,631.00 $ 91,661.43 $ 53,411.82 $ 110,255.21 $ 39,341.83 $ 88,079.85 $ (9,289.64) $ 114,654.14 $ (1,027,484.05) Change % 7.6% 3.0% 7.3% 4.0% 7.9% 2.6% 5.7% -0.6% 7.1% -59.1% $250,000 $200,000 $150,000 $100,000 $50,000 ` Jan Feb Mar Apr Monthly Liquor Sales 11 11 May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec ■ 2008 ■ 2009 ■ 2010 ■ 2011 ■ 2012 ■ 2013 ■ 2014 ■ 2015 ■ 2017 ■ 2018 Y -T -D 16.7% 13.2% 14.1% 11.7% 12.1% Hi -Way Liquors Sales Report 5/31/2018 Wine Month 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 CYM-LYM Y -T -D Jan $ 30,700.42 $ 41,810.19 $ 43,324.18 $ 48,437.59 $ 50,238.83 $ 54,949.83 $ 59,391.16 $ 61,128.65 $ 60,454.56 $ 57,275.16 $ 60,047.20 4.8% 4.8% Feb 33,407.17 39,410.85 42,230.84 52,847.05 54,642.27 60,573.12 57,228.51 62,600.47 64,797.38 58,664.45 62,027.36 5.7% 5.3% Mar 47,603.93 45,525.38 46,165.18 54,639.16 57,735.22 77,810.58 66,425.24 67,121.51 71,840.82 64,286.75 74,221.20 15.5% 8.9% Apr 31,755.42 48,303.48 61,146.04 62,289.18 57,973.74 79,736.19 63,101.05 63,285.56 61,268.24 69,415.79 93,299.96 34.4% 16.0% May 38,522.75 40,963.86 45,733.08 68,701.95 78,740.40 62,491.07 92,083.62 109,512.94 87,333.35 82,724.29 61,684.97 -25.4% 5.7% Jun 31,796.95 37,522.00 44,211.14 49,089.65 56,607.74 59,523.15 54,270.56 59,036.14 54,889.39 58,623.08 - Jul 36,909.44 41,813.65 48,334.93 49,664.45 54,467.20 57,115.44 57,743.98 66,029.11 60,750.62 64,034.24 Aug 35,932.62 41,333.00 46,871.28 53,172.68 61,825.30 64,057.61 62,446.04 63,546.01 60,015.78 66,304.12 Sep 33,830.69 39,798.20 47,859.52 53,916.37 60,317.17 59,121.12 59,409.30 62,210.27 65,294.31 68,220.79 Oct 45,750.04 48,422.79 58,081.87 60,949.40 66,423.82 75,606.28 63,659.41 70,038.32 89,005.29 70,516.61 Nov 50,106.64 66,331.86 71,928.30 85,933.28 97,249.52 96,824.40 117,402.23 122,947.90 83,896.45 109,969.88 Dec 75,866.80 84,285.84 101,676.19 109,267.01 116,610.70 113,008.24 115,617.50 120,274.96 129,536.28 124,115.79 - Total $ 492,182.87 $ 575,521.10 $ 657,562.55 $ 748,907.77 $ 812,831.91 $ 860,817.03 $ 868,778.60 $ 927,731.84 $ 889,082.47 $ 894,150.95 $ 351,280.69 Change $ 83,338.23 $ 82,041.45 $ 91,345.22 $ 63,924.14 $ 47,985.12 $ 7,961.57 $ 58,953.24 $ (38,649.37) $ 5,068.48 $ (542,870.26) Change % 16.9% 14.3% 13.9% 8.5% 5.9% 0.9% 6.8% -4.2% 0.6% -60.7% $140,000 $120,000 $100,000 $80,000 $60,000 $40,000 $20,000 Monthly Wine Sales Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct ■ 2008 ■ 2009 ■ 2010 ■ 2011 ■ 2012 ■ 2013 ■ 2014 ■ 2015 ■ 2017 ■ 2018 Nov Dec $6.5 $6.0 $5.5 $5.0 C C 0 $4.5 $4.0 $3.5 $3.0 Liquor Store Sales - Rolling 12 Month Periods 3 N N 0 J E1 N — 0 J E1 w 0 3 N N — 0 J E1 N — 0 3 E1 w 0 3 N N — 0 J 91 91 — 0 3 d 91 0 J d d l0 O N N W A In Ot J � M04CH Y OF icell0 HUMAN RESOURCES Hiring Updates Fire Department- The full-time fire department position approved by council last November for a mid -year 2018 hire will be posted the week of June 18th. The Emergency Services Coordinator -Fire Marshal position will be responsible for managing and coordinating the city's emergency response program and performing fire department duties related to firefighter training, plan review and fire related inspections, fire department budgeting and purchases, community education programs etc. Water and Sewer Department- The Water and Sewer Department will be accepting applications for a Water -Sewer Operator over the next few weeks. Mat Stang plans to hire an Operator to replace the position left vacant due to his promotion and then over time assess the candidates on staff for promotion to Foreman. Hi-Wav Liquors- Long-time full-time employee Cheryl Wilke gave her notice last week and will be retiring the end of August. A posting will go out in the next couple of weeks to fill the full-time vacancy. Department of Building Safety and Code Enforcement- There were 3 qualified candidates for the Chief Building Official position. Interviews were conducted the week of June 4th and an offer of employment has been extended. The offer is currently being reviewed by the candidate. The City received 9 applications for the Building Inspector -Code Enforcement Officer position and will be interviewing 3-4 candidates the week of June 251h. DMV- The DMV continues to be busy and in addition to accepting applications for daytime non -certified clerks, the DMV is also accepting applications for a part-time certified clerk to work evenings processing dealer work. This is a new idea proposed by DMV Manager, Carolyn Granger. The posting for a certified evening clerk will remain open until filled. 7� CH Y OF ntfcdo MONTICELLO COMMUNITY CENTER (MCC) Transactions and visits Year to date (05.31.18), the MCC processed 42,586 which is 5,869 fewer transactions than we had at the same time last year. The MCC year to date revenue is $712,115 which is an increase of $45,336 from last year. Year to date member visits are 65,467 compared to 67,452 last year. We closed out the month of May with 5,726 members compared to 4,444 last year. 80000 70000 60000 50000 40000 30000 20000 10000 MCC 5/31 YTD Activity YTD Transactions YTD Member Visits ■ 2016 ■ 2017 ■ 2018 Council Connection - 06/25/18 $800,000 $700,000 $600,000 $500,000 $400,000 $300,000 $200,000 $100,000 7000 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 MCC 5/31 YTD Revenue ■ 2016 ■ 2017 ■ 2018 MCC 5/31 Memberships ■ 2016 ■ 2017 ■ 2018 Programs and events Thursday, May 31 marked the start of our Music on the Mississippi Concert Series. Brat Pack Radio entertained a crowd of about 550 people. The Lions sold beer and corn dogs and were pleased with their sales. A food truck provided more options for concert goers. The weather was perfect and the event was well received. The first Arts Day at the Market took place on Thursday, June 71h. Four local artists joined the Farmers Market. The market that week was well received by over 400 shoppers. The market is packed with food, live music and special guests each Council Connection - 06/25/18 week. We just need to see more customers each week to keep vendors interested. There are many other markets in the area. To keep the vendors coming to Monticello we need customers. Please help spread the word and join us to see how fun it is! Friendship Island began on Monday, June 4. A total of 61 kids are enrolled at this point and we will likely see a few more registrations throughout the summer. We hosted an open house on May 30 to give families a chance to meet the staff and get an orientation. Friendship Island will continue through August 24 and we are still able to take more kids. The Monticello Community Center helped in the planning and execution of Walk 'n Roll on Saturday, June 9. About 600 people were in attendance during the bike drawing where 60 bikes were awarded. This event requires a team of staff to execute: MCC, Parks & Community Development. Fitness classes started using the newly renovated Prairie Center Yoga Suite starting June 1. Nine classes a week are taking place in that space. We received a donation to add mirrors. The space is also available for private rentals. May and June were big months for school group visits at the Monticello Community Center. We had 1,257 students come through our doors during ten days of reservations plus the Annandale graduation party. During the ten days of groups we had: • 180 indoor wall climbers • 43 hours of Warehouse use • We sold 408 pretzels and cheese, 86 hots dogs, 278 slices of pizza and 70 entire pizzas, 66 bottles of Gatorade, 138 Nachos, 195 bags of popcorn, 222 cookies, 318 sherbet cups, 89 muffins, 103 fruit snacks, 447 slushies, and 432 bottles of soda. We started off the month of June with critical incident training for our Guest Services staff. Brian Johnson from the Wright County Sheriff's Office gave a presentation on general safety concerns that our staff may encounter with the public. We are resurfacing the wood flooring in the Mississippi Room on June 22 and 23. In June alone we have had five weddings in the Mississippi Room and three chapel weddings. Some other Mississippi Room rentals for the month include the VA hosting an event for Veterans of the Vietnam War and Cargill is hosting a business breakfast for 250 people. M04CH Y OF icella PARKS DEPARTMENT The Parks Department's primary goal is to maintain the City's park and pathway facilities which include cemeteries, picnic shelters, playgrounds, sports fields, etc. Here are a few of the key items that have been happening within the Parks Department: • Installation of a new playground at Featherstone Park • Coordinated with other departments for the Walk 'ri Roll event • Working on construction of a shelter for the Rolling Woods Park • Continue to work with the design of the Bertram Chain of Lakes Park project, including work with consultants and touring other facilities • Met with Xcel energy on the potential to install a trail system on their property on the west end of the City • Coordinating this year's trail sealing project STREETS DEPARTMENT The Streets Department's primary goal is to maintain the City's roadway network which includes the storm water infrastructure in a safe and efficient manner. Here are a few of the key items that have been happening within the Streets Department: • Crack sealing roadways in preparation for chip seal • Coordinating this year's chip sealing project with Astech Corporation • Mowing Boulevards • Repairing equipment • Coordinating with this year's construction projects • Addressing storm water concerns UTILITIES DEPARTMENT The Utilities Department's primary goals are to provide for safe, reliable, and clean drinking water and to provide safe and efficient collection of wastewater without impacting the environment. Here are a few of the key items that have been happening within the Utilities Department: • Working on filling a vacant position • Well maintenance • Hydrant maintenance • Read water meters • Coordinating with this year's construction projects