The URL can be used to link to this page

City Council Agenda Packet 09-24-2018AGENDA REGULAR MEETING — MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, September 24, 2018 — 6:30 p.m. Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING 5:15 p.m. (Academy Room) 5:15 p.m. Ellison House Update 5:30 p.m. Walnut Street Corridor Plan Mayor: Brian Stumpf Council Members: Jim Davidson, Bill Fair, Charlotte Gabler, Lloyd Hilgart 1. General Business A. Call to Order & Pledge of Allegiance B. Approval of Agenda — Councilmembers or the City Administrator may add items to the agenda for discussion purposes or approval. The City Council may or may not take official action on items added to the agenda. C. Approval of Meeting Minutes • Special Meeting Minutes from September 10, 2018 • Regular Meeting Minutes from September 10, 2018 D. Citizen Comments — Individuals may address the City Council about any item not contained on the agenda. Each speaker will be allotted three minutes with a maximum of five speakers. The Mayor may allow for additional time and/or speakers. The City Council generally takes no official action of items discussed, with the exception of referral to staff for future report. E. Public Service Announcements/Updates • Color Me Fall Event (September 29) • Fire Department Open House (October 6) • Construction Update F. Council Liaison Updates • Library Board • EDA • I-94 Coalition G. Department Updates • City Administrator Update • Human Resources Update • Monticello School Superintendent Eric Olson 2. Consent Agenda — All items listed on the Consent Agenda are considered standard or may not need discussion prior to approval. These items are acted upon by one motion unless a councilmember, the city administrator, or a citizen requests the item by removed from consent for additional discussion. A. Consideration of approving payment of bills B. Consideration of approving new hires and departures for City departments C. Consideration of approving the sale/disposal of surplus city property D. Consideration of authorizing an amendment to liquor license for Rustech Brewery to allow for a temporary outdoor patio E. Consideration of establishing a date for the Truth -in -Taxation Public Hearing F. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2018-80 awarding the sale of General Obligation Tax Abatement Bonds, Series 2018A, in the original aggregate principal amount of $5,000,000; fixing their form and specifications; directing their execution and delivery; and providing for their payment G. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2018-81 declaring costs to be assessed, ordering preparation of assessment roll and calling for an Assessment Hearing on October 22, 2018 to adopt assessments for the 7th Street, Chelsea Road, and Washington Street improvements as related to the Fallon Avenue Overpass Project, City Project No. 16C006 H. Consideration of authorizing purchase of a 2019 Vactor 2100 Plus through the state contract from MacQueen Equipment for $442,290 and declaring the 1999 Vac -Con truck as surplus property I. Consideration of changing the Public Works Business Hours J. Consideration of accepting final design selections, authorizing award payment, accepting quotes and awarding banner preparation for the 2018 banner project on Walnut/Broadway/Pine 2A. Consideration of items removed from the consent agenda for discussion 3. Public Hearings 4. Regular Agenda A. Consideration of authorizing the distribution of the Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for the proposed Haven Ridge development 5. Added Items 6. Adjournment AGENDA CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, September 24, 2018 — 5:15 p.m. Academy Room, MCC AGENDA 1. Call to Order 2. 5:15 p.m. Ellison House Update 3. 5:30 p.m. Walnut Street Corridor Plan 4. Adjournment 2. WORKSHOP — Consideration of comment on the Walnut Street Corridor Concept Plan (AS) REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND City Council is asked to review for comment the draft Walnut Corridor Concept Plan. The Downtown Small Area Plan identified as one of the four primary goals "Shift the Center of Downtown to Walnut and Broadway". Within the Small Area document are a series of recommendations related to supporting that goal. In reviewing these recommendations, staff presented to the City Council a request to proceed with a more specific design planning effort for the Walnut and River Street corridors, which Council approved to proceed in February of 2018. The Walnut Corridor Concept Plan has therefore been developed to provide direction for improvements and investments along the corridor which are in keeping with the goals of the Downtown Small Area Plan. An initial workshop meeting and downtown walking tour was held with the EDA and City Council during the summer of this year. At that time, Council and EDA members were able to provide initial feedback and direction to help continue to shape the plan. The plan focuses on Walnut Street from 5th Street (at the MCC) to River Street, and looks at the connection between Walnut and River Street. The plan provides recommended corridor treatments which respond directly to the investment and implementation strategies called out by the Small Area Plan. It should be noted that the plan is designed to be incremental, that is, accomplished over time. The plan can be implemented in phases as traffic (both pedestrian/cycle and vehicle) increases in the downtown, as reinvestment and redevelopment offer opportunities to make improvements, and as funding is available. At this time, the final draft plan is ready for review in a workshop with the City Council. Project consultant Cuningham Group will be on hand to present the plan and answer questions and receive feedback. At the Downtown Round meeting of September 20th, staff encouraged attendees interested in the corridor effort to attend the public Council workshop. The goal of the workshop is for Council to provide any final feedback to finalize the plan for acceptance at an upcoming Council meeting in October. SUPPORTING DATA Draft Walnut Corridor Concept Plan Excerpts, Downtown Monticello Small Area Plan / �. � � r�ys.�5 �� ekI ®\ � 9�z dr-- --- _— Walnut Street C Concept P Monticello, M N September 17, 2018 DRAFT DRAFT 9/17/2018 Principles and Values Connectivity Walnut Street will connect three of the city's most valuable and beloved assets - the Community Center, Broadway Street and the River. It will be a comfortable and simple connection for all residents and visitors of the City to use throughout the year. Sociability Walnut Street will become a place where gathering, celebration, and simple interaction with friends and strangers can occur in a safe and inviting manner. The street will be designed to showcase creativity, art and the unique identity of the City. Sustainability Walnut Street will highlight the City's commitment to sustainability. It will responsibly manage greenspace and stormwater and will encourage a healthy lifestyle by promoting walking and cycling between the Community Center and the River. Incremental Walnut Street corridor improvements will be implemented over time. While capital improvements will be budgeted for and implemented, many of the improvements will be implemented along with redevelopments and separate initiatives as they arise. DRAFT 9/17/2018 CII KING HAM G R 0 V P Downtown Small Area Plan Design Principles from the Downtown Monticello Small Area Plan ,a T*' t®® r®f' fl'-] nm n nn Shift the Center and Double Down on Broadway. Improve the Pine Street Experience for Everyone. Engage and love the riverfront. Go beyond the Swan. Lots of Small Investments, a few medium ones and just one or two big ones. DRAFT 9/17/2018 CII KING HAM G R 0 V P City Wide Significance ' s A Community Center to River Mississippi River Trail to 5th Street Bike Trail A space for everyone Walnut Street connects two of the Cities most important amenities and destinations : the Community Center/ Senior Center/City Hall to the Riverfront. In addition, Walnut Street is bisected by two important recreational trails: the Mississippi River Train and the 5th Street bike Trail. This Plan offers a concept plan for how Walnut Street can be redesigned to function as both a connection between the Community Center and the Riverfront and as an important public space in and of itself. A new Walnut street can become a positive address for development, a place for creative expression, gathering, and a safe and pleasant way for everyone in the community to get to the Community Center and the Riverfront. The Family Path is a key feature to the overall design. The Family is an off-street, two-way multi -use trail that connects the Community Center to the River. The Family Path is intended for strolling, jogging, and slow biking. It is designed to be safe and comfortable for users of all abilities; however experienced cyclists are encouraged to use the street. The Family Path will be lined with amenities such as benches, art and shade trees. At intersections, the Family Path crosses the street with special markings, ensuring cross traffic knows the intersection will be occupied by children, elderly, cyclists, scooters, and others. DRAFT 9/17/2018 CII KING HAM G R 0 V P Walnut Street Corridor - Issues Sidewalks jog and are not connected to side streets. On -street parking is available, but it is unclear due to intermittent diagonal parking. The riverfront parks are disconnected from Downtown and the rest of the city because Walnut Street ends in a parking lot. The tight dimensions and lack of bumper stops allow cars to overhand the sidewalk - thereby narrowing the walking area to less than 3'. Nc �` � �►'� � 4 I i. if � ��,` _� � __LAL .� ------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- e1 W7 i ,fie- , West B Park A,4,1 Street is wider than necessary, creating less than ideal conditions for walking and cycling. Crossing Broadway is uncomfortable. The two sides of Monticello's Main Street are disconnected. Existing Bridge Park is not connected to Downtown or Walnut Street due to sidewalks that end and no ramp to Walnut Street. © DRAFT 9/17/2018 CII KING HAM G R 0 V P 4- (U P N ) v v L/) t v v V o v N > lfl � M 00 DC Nc �` � �►'� � 4 I i. if � ��,` _� � __LAL .� ------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- e1 W7 i ,fie- , West B Park A,4,1 Street is wider than necessary, creating less than ideal conditions for walking and cycling. Crossing Broadway is uncomfortable. The two sides of Monticello's Main Street are disconnected. Existing Bridge Park is not connected to Downtown or Walnut Street due to sidewalks that end and no ramp to Walnut Street. © DRAFT 9/17/2018 CII KING HAM G R 0 V P Walnut Street Corridor - Concept Plan Big Rooms Promenade ' • "Family Track"a 2 lane pathway • Public Art and Community Identity • Seating areas and shade ' • Free little libraries 1 • Stormwater and landscaping ' • strolling events and activities • sidewalk 1 1 1 1 1 -- -- ----- - - - - -, - 1 Library, v, Community v , Cargill Center , v 4-1 �' N ---- 1 ------------11- ------- L, - � -------------------- 2 M _ 1 1 1 , 1 1 I 11 ---------—-—————— a L ----—--------—------— L ------------------ Civic—--—--------—------— Civic _ • Business and Civic Activity • Diagonal parking • Compact section • Programming relates to Library and Community Center Shared and Convertible Street • Markets • Celebrations • Overlook the river 1 1 ------ ---------- - j 1 —� ' West Bridge ' ' Park 1 L — — — — — — —-�— Broadway • Cafe Seating • Walk your bike/ park your bike • Curb extensions at Broadway and Locust • Sidewalk sales DRAFT 9/17/2018 CII KING HAM G R 0 V P Walnut Street Corridor - Concept Plan Medium Rooms Community U Library v, Center s o O - O _o 0 on street _ Cargill Gather With others next to the community center Intersect With art at 4th and Walnut r V .1 on streel 77 O � m � - - - - -------- -- - - - - ----------- ------� l West Bridge Park -� L --- Eat Under a grove of trees at Broadway .1 � r Celebrate: On Walnut between Broadway and the River DRAFT 9/17/2018 CII KING HAM G R 0 V P Walnut Street Corridor - Concept Plan Small Rooms Qj Cargill Qj N �n o a rn CO --------------------- 1 ��----y-- IF INN H A_ Plug and Play / Mix and Match >00* Trellis and swings 6 Shade trees and groundcover .,.�rmwater Ht♦.H mow► � � Games and pop UPS Along the corridor, between the tracks and Cornerstone Cafe, the east side of the road will have a +/- 6' zone between the sidewalk and the family path that can be put to productive use for many purposes. It can be used for stormwater, outdoor seating, art, shade trees and benches. These spaces can be implemented over time, as funding and interest allows. F Shade trees and benches DRAFT 9/17/2018 CII KING HAM G R 0 V P Walnut Street Corridor - Proposed Design Existing 1A I No significant changes 36'road = 8' parking + 10' drive lanes Pavement Materials FamilyTrack "Rooms" Tan/Red Colored Concrete Stamped Dark Charcoal Colored Concrete I< 8' Family Path 6' Amenity Zone (small rooms) 5'walk sidewalk family path 80'-0" Right -Of -Way 80"0" Right -Of -Way � 36-10" Street Width 26-0" 19'-0" 19'-0"i. Existing Angled Parking = v' _ Angled Parking v 3 3 z — — sidewalks between Back of Curb and 5'-0" 8'4" 10'41 101-01, 8,-01194. 9'-0" 5-0" --rnes— tt T-6° Sidewalk Parallel Parking Travel Lane Travel Lane Parallel Parking FamilyTrack/ Small Outdoor Multi-UseTrail Rooms Sidewalk Future Street Section (typical) 80'-0" Right -Of -Way � 4-0" Street Width 19'-0"i. Intersections and Angled Parking sidewalks between Back of Curb and Cornerstone and River •- Sidewalk w 8'-0" / 10'-0" 101-0" / 8'-0" w 8'4" 5'4, Varies] vim Varies z� r Existing Sidewalk Parallel Parking Travel Lane Travel Lane Parallel Parking FamilyTrack/ Multi-UseTrail Existing Sidewalk Interim Street Section (typical) Patterned or stamped Standard Brushed Concrete Concrete DRAFT 9/17/2018 CII KING HAM e G R 0 V P Character Area - Promenade Betwen the Community Center and Broadway,Walnut is designed as a Promenade with a paralell Family Path. The intersection of 4th Street and Walnut is highlighted with Community ° public art, and comfortable places to sit and relax. The publicly owned property at the Center i ; Bridge rail tracks is redeveloped and a portio of it is incoporated into the corridor design Park Cargill v v no changes to the western curb line Ln no changes to the western curb line L Y s v ~ m — — — — ——— — — — — �— — — — — — — --�� 36' lparallel parking Parallel parking tj City Owned Family Path public art r Family Path potential development W v _r .. bike trail Y New development Ot Jilin,€ E Q` ` �. f l L W <'� + �Y FAA �•:.r 'e Re �. Fh I ,., � Th 71 I •Si a Walnut Street Family Path �V A_ ,rjjyy�,y � Walnut reet .-M _ I DRAFT 9/17/2018 CII KING HAM G R 0 V P Character Area - Broadway e a et Community Center Bridge Park Insurance vmrID�hmnt�ttmttlhrewxel�nmlfim� ---� — — — Family Path parallel parking r, Lparking ttJ�TARIA H F!p Walnut Street bike corral ` A& bike Cornerstone Cafe At Broadway, Walnut Street is designed to accommodate outdoor dining and safe crossing of Broadway Street. Bikers are encouraged to walk their bikes or park them in bike corrals and others are encouraged to enjoy the shade under a grove of Dental trees. 3 24 W 32' Dance Studio Cornerstone cafe P. l �4e�1 AI l III _ �r k .... r DRAFT 9/17/2018 CUNINGHA G A 0 U P P Character Area - Shared + Convertible Street a� Community Center Bridge Park v Dental 3 v 0 m - - - - - - - - - - -- di �on,I�p.,�in. 49' — atop alt • ' ... a parallel parr king 20' Dance Studio �7—TBessies7 A,`rs,s yr-4—u:�■ara.� Broadway �Q112U" treet 4 �, rI� � T• --3 1 � ) it West Bridge Park Between Broadway and River Street, Walnut Street is designed as a "Shared Street." The space between the buildings is curbless, and can therefore be used more flexibly. It will have diagonal and parallel parking, as well as a drop off zone for the dance studio. On occasion, the street can be closed and used for gathering, festivals, and other events occasionally throughout the year. Other amenities, such as benches, shade trees, lighting and banners signify that this section of Walnut Street is special and it's use is shared by many. West Bridge Park 12 S.1 DRAFT 9/17/2018 CII KING HAM G R O V P Walnut Street Ramp: Interim Solution baa ��Z hr rya `Oaa Q\,Ql Community Center Bridge Park Dental Office v v Ln— — — it Walnut Street _ Walnut Street • -- ----- -- ----- Dance - - Dance Studio J; striping in the parking lot new ramp Bessies t f West Bridge _ Park new ramp Q1124� \ f ( crosswalks ex�ende�d si ewa k End of Walnut Street Sidewalk at West River Park DRAFT 02/10/10 ® DRAFT 9/17/2018 Cl1NINGU P G R O V P Background and Purpose The purpose of this Plan is to attract and direct investments on the core blocks of Downtown Monticello, MN over the next 10 years. The Plan advocates for solidifying Downtown as the heart of the community with a series of coordinated public and private investments. Together, these investments will create a human -scaled environment that encourages gathering, socializing, visiting and enjoying on a daily basis - throughout the year. The improvements outlined in this Plan aim to build on the unique qualities of Monticello to make the Downtown yet more attractive to those who have chosen to live and do business in the community. Specifically, the Plan seeks to promote Broadway Street as a storefront district with restaurants and specialty retail, celebrate the River for its recreational, connective and economic qualities, reinvigorate a downtown housing market with multiple, appropriately scaled, infill projects, and improve the experience of Pine Street for all users. The plan is ambitious, but achievable. Over time and upon completion, the plan would usher in up to 500 new units of downtown housing, new restaurants overlooking the river, and unique retail and services on Broadway. Momentum can be established in the next few years. Primary projects to be completed within five years include: redevelopment of Block 52, Walnut Street connection to River Street and infill housing on Walnut Street. Implementation of this Plan will create two legacies. The first will be a revitalized Downtown with an economy and attractions that benefit all residents of Monticello. Equally important, however to the physical improvements described above will be the legacy of new partnerships and civic cooperation that are essential to and will result from coordinated actions. The ideas set forth in this Plan come from the vested interest of the Monticello community through a broad public outreach effort. The realization of these ideas rely on a coordinated, cooperative, and active public sector working in tandem with an entrepreneurial private sector The result will be a lively Downtown for all in Monticello, a place that embodies both its history and future aspirations. Goals M 000 000 000 � 000°000 F n F m nfl 71111 000 �00� II III n� Improve Pine Street for All Users Shift the Center of Town to Walnut and Encourage Small and Medium Scaled Become a River Town Broadway Investments NOTE:Yhis illustration depicts new deveopment on both private and public properties. The plan does not compel private property owners to change anything regarding how they use their land. Rather, the Plan is a guide for change if the property owner chooses to do ,so. Please seepage for an illustration of the Master Plan as it applies to publicly held properties only. The City will endeavor to work with' existing business who wish to remain, revitalize and expand in the downtown_ City of Monticello Downtown Small Area Plan I Executive Summary 0 Frameworks Land Use, Open Space and Transportation are the three frameworks that organize and define the physical environment. As with systems in the human body, each must function independently - and together with - the others. If one fails, they all fail. This is why it is important to understand frameworks as individual systems that must function as part of a single Downtown. The Plan is also divided into frameworks in order to allow different agencies, departments, and investors act in concert with each other. This will help ensure public and private investments are coordinated, less risky, and more publicly acceptable. Framework: Open Space and Parks (Primary recommednations) • Improve Riverfront Parks to accommodate more programming and events • Redesign Walnut Street and River Street to allow for park extention during events • Convert vacant lots on Broadway to small pocket parks • Utilize River islands for additional natural park space • Create pedestrian refuges or enhanced building entry ways on the corners of blocks along Pine Street • Enliven open spaces with public art wherever possible Framework: Access and Circulation • Emphasize connectivity throughout the Core, with pedestrian and bike friendly streets, a complete sidewalk system, and connectivity to the in -town neighborhoods. • Promote a "complete streets" policy that balances the needs of all users in the Downtown. • Manage and improve the grid system to support connectivity and access throughout Downtown • Work with MnDOT to improve Pine Street for users of Downtown Monticello, including additional signals, maintaining the River Street signal and supporting an additional river crossing • Improve pedestrian crossings of Broadway at Walnut and Cedar to improve access to the Riverfront • Reconnect Walnut Street with River Street Framework: Development and Land Use • Riverfront District with destination restaurant and entertainment uses, as well as housing • Broadway District with shopfront retail and restaurant uses beneath housing and offices • In -town neighborhoods extend to Walnut and Cedar Street with new infill housing 2-4 stories (apartments and townhouses) Additional recomendations are included in the Framewoirks Section pages 25-32 Open Space and Parks ' V Access and Circulation Development and land Use Immediate Next Steps and Implementation 1. Improve the physical environment with streetscape, benches, programming, and art. 2. Bolster Broadway with a facade improvement program and retail recruitment. 3. Aggressively market development opportunities such as Block 52 and infill housing on Walnut and Cedar Street 4. Enact the appropriate policies, programs and incentives that enable the type of development described in the Plan. How is This Plan Related to the Embracing Downtown Plan and the Comprehensive Plan? In 2010, the City of Monticello completed the "Embracing Downtown Plan". The full area considered to be "Downtown Monticello"extends from Interstate I-94 to the Mississippi River, and generally from Cedar Street to Maple Street. The Embracing Downtown Plan was adopted as an appendix to the Comprehensive Plan. Changes in the retail marketplace overall, and more specifically market changes and reinvestments in downtown Monticello, have created a need to develop a new planning perspective for the core blocks of the downtown. This document therefore is an update to the 2008 Monticello Comprehensive Plan and to the Embracing Downtown Plan for the Downtown. This Plan will replace the Embracing Downtown plan as an appendix to the Comprehensive Plan. City of Monticello Downtown Small Area Plan I Executive Summary 0 Walnut Street and Cedar Street Walnut and Cedar Streets Character Area: The recommendations and guidelines on this page pertain to the area colored on this diagram Walnut Street and Cedar Street are important corridors to the River as well as transitions between the commercial areas of downtown and the in -town neighborhoods. In order to perform in this capacity, the Plan encourages new housing to infill vacant lots and eventually for single family housing to transition to medium density housing. Live/work units or small service/production (such as insurance agent or jewelry maker) are permitted. In addition, the Plan recommends improvements to the street that will accommodate pedestrian and bike access to the River. This includes parallel parking, aligned sidewalks and crosswalks, and curb extensions at Broadway. 69.1 a r, Create a pedestrian promenade to the O Encourage new housing to face Walnut and Cedar Street, with 0 Riverfront with wide continuous sidewalks and multiple doors facing the street. well marked crosswalksO Locate all parking towards the middle of the block, accessed Infill vacant lots and redevelop underutilized via a rear lane shared with other properties on the block. 0 parcels with housing in small apartments or townhouses. Small service or production Encourage small and medium scaled residential buildings uses are permitted within these and existing a wal5 stories, 1/4 to 1/2 block) that prioritize pedestrian scale and walkability. buildings. Perspective along Walnut Street, looking north towards the River. ; I I r Y4P P� �< X X I 8' 12' 8' I< ., _ ID L Y CD m PI X X 24' 8' 12' 8' 80' ROW River Street Broadway 3rd Street as 0� 0,� g 4th Street s� v„ a 5th Street tracks a � C ' 0 7th Street v Walnut Street Promenade to the River Y Proposed Parallel Parking Section of Walnut and Cedar Street On -street parking is important throughout Downtown. Parallel parking will not require an easement and is desireable in front of residential buildings. Diagonal parking requires an easement and yields 50% more parking spaces. City of Monticello Downtown Small Area Plan I Character Areas M Walnut Street and Cedar Street Guidelines Precedent Images Facade and Frontage • Porches and/ or dooryards are encouraged for all ground floor residential units. • Dormers and bay windows are encouraged to create a pedestrian scaled facade • Upper story balconies are encouraged. • Courtyards are permitted along 1/2 of a front property line. Public Realm • 6'-10' sidewalk, aligned across intersections and along the front of blocks. • On street parking for visitors to Downtown • Clearly marked crosswalks to accommodate pedestrian and bike access between the Community Center and the Riverfront Massing and Orientation • Buildings should be between 2 and 4 stories. • Buildings should be primarily oriented to Walnut and Cedar Street to create a comfortable pedestrian environment. • Dormers and roof articulations should be used to reduce the scale of buildings if buildings are longer than 100' in length. Building Use and Location • Primarily residential uses between the Civic Center and Walnut Street. Small scale service and commercial businesses permitted on corner of 4th and Cedar and 4th and Walnut. Buildings oriented toward front (street) and front corners City of Monticello Downtown Small Area Plan I Character Areas M Block 52 Block 52 (Public ownership in blue) Block 52 is a key block in the Downtown. It is highly visible and it sits on the West Bridge Park. The site slopes approximately 15' from Broadway to River Street. Broadway and Walnut contain mercantile buildings of varying quality. River Street has vacant parcels and underutilized buildings. Active Frontage Flexible Frontage (either Active or Residential) Frontage And Ground Floor Uses Active frontages (high transparency) and uses (retail and restaurants) should be located on Broadway, Walnut, and the west half of River Street. The remainder of the block is flexible - it can have either residential or active frontages. Building Setback Pocket Park & Open Space Setbacks, Pocket Parks & Open Space Buildings should define the perimeter of the Block. Minor setbacks (5'-10') for overhangs, seating, and display of goods is permitted on Broadway and Walnut. A more generous setback is permitted on Pine due to traffic volumes and access. Attached corner plazas are encouraged on the northwest corner of the block and permitted on the northeast and southeast corners. A� 'T rTri, IltltlF:.. r~ Surface Parking Access Way Parking & Servicing Access to mid block parking is encouraged on Pine Street and Walnut St. Parking should have minimal exposure to Broadway, River or Walnut St but should be large enough to replace the existing public parking lot on the block and should be expandable if the south side of the block redevelops. Careful consideration should be given to visibility and access to parking from Pine St since that will be the primary access as the site will be approached from the Bridge. Extra signage or a turning lane may be required. 1 A .� u�Fig /C, P 101, A Ole ay III 4-04 Options The two illustrations above show potential options for development on Block 52 - both adhering to the guidelines. The top illustration shows new development on Broadway, articulated at a Main Street scale, with a corner plaza and a covered pass through as a form of pocket park. The bottom illustration shows a single corner development on Broadway, with a pocket park. , f Approaching Downtown from the Bridge Block 52 is the Gateway Block to Downtown from the Bridge. It is important to create an easy way for visitors to access mid -block parking as they approach downtown. The image to the left shows the approach - with enhanced landscaping, a turn lane, and clear signage to direct drivers to parking mid -block. City of Monticello Downtown Small Area Plan I Character Areas N Frameworks: Purpose Land Use, Open Space and Transportation are the three frameworks that organize and define the physical environment. As with systems in the human body, each must function independently - and together with - the others. If one fails, others are impacted. This is why it is important to understand frameworks as individual systems that must function as part of a single Downtown. The Plan is also divided into frameworks in order to allow different agencies, departments, and investors to act in concert with each other. This will help ensure public and private investments are coordinated, less risky, and more publicly acceptable. O — Required Retail Frontage — Small Retail Opportunities Commercial Mixed -Use Multi -Family Housing Public Employment Pa rk/Open S pace/Cemetery Core Study Area sh- - •. 4*♦ 1 .♦ ♦• 1 Frameworks: Land Use and Development Development patterns that support social interaction, local character, and a compact connected and walkable environment. General Approach The Land Use Plan promotes a development pattern that recognizes the essential role that Downtowns plays in the communities they serve. Successful Downtowns tend to be places that serve many functions for the full cross section of the community throughout the year and across generations. They are places to gather, eat, live, shop, celebrate, protest, recreate, meet, be entertained, and to visit. They are places that promote social interactions and the unique creative expression of the community. At their best, Downtowns are places that exude pride because they represent the best the community has to offer. In order to promote these ideals, this Plan favors policies and development patterns that improve downtown for those who currently use it and patterns that support the places that people value. Therefore, development patterns and land uses in this Plan seek to support the Main Street character of Broadway, the importance of Walnut Street as a promenade to the River, regional and local needs of Pine Street, and the riverfront as the birthplace of the City. This Plan also recognizes the traditional (and still relevant) role of Downtown Monticello as well as the changing nature of small Downtowns throughout the country. In doing so, the Plan is committed to retaining the small scale shopfront District on Broadway by encouraging uses that value "experience" over "convenience". At the same time, the Plan encourages Pine Street (the regional face of downtown) to develop as a corridor that emphasizes convenience and accessibility. Together, both Broadway and Pine Street can complement each other to create a downtown that attracts a wide range of investments. Physically, the Plan favors compact walkable small town design with a fine grained mix of uses. The Plan arranges development types and land uses so valued places are supported, and new investments can add to the overall vitality of downtown. Recommendations • Create a Center to Downtown that is active throughout the day and into the evening - year round. The Walnut / Broadway Intersection should become the heart of this area. • Improve connections to the River by locating uses that benefit from open spaces and activities associated with the River. • Improve the entry experience from the north. • Maintain a shopfront District along Broadway, west of Pine Street comprised of traditional main street (mercantile) buildings that have retail/restaurant space on the ground floor and wither housing or offices above. • Create a development pattern on Pine Street that benefits from high visibility and regional access. • Infill Walnut Street and Cedar Street with mid scale housing (2-4 stories) that creates an effective transition between the in -town neighborhoods and the Downtown. City of Monticello Downtown Small Area Plan I Character Areas N Frameworks: Parks and Open Spaces Parks, Plazas, and Sidewalks that are lively, safe and pleasant to be in. �t @, ®� West Bridgell o49 ,��Park ` I, 00'sc� O/ w h h� Q �w a dd metery�� L� Improved Pedestrian 0 and Bicycle Crossing ■ Community Parks Neighborhood Parks E� Pocket Parks Seasonal Bridge Convertible Streets Pedestrian Promenade to River Proposed Bituminous Trail Connections '1111 Existing Bituminous Trial ® ® ® ® MRTTrail East Bridge -Poll \ / "O's, rePr Ri�P�Sr�Per °er 4th Street Park Picnic Area Park Facilities Playground Water Feature Amphitheater Seasonal Bridge Park Overlook Public Gardens Sledding Hill General Approach Parks and Open Space play an important role in distinguishing the Downtown from other areas of Monticello. Unlike much of Monticello where parks are generally programmed for recreational / sports and defined by trees and greenery, the parks downtown should focus on gathering and general social interaction as well as planned events. Therefore, in order to support and enhance the environment for downtown residents and businesses, this Plan expands the definition of parks beyond the valued park spaces that are already in use - namely Front Street Park, East and West Bridge Park. The Downtown Parks should also take in consideration the needs of new downtown residents and visitors. Upon implementation of this plan, several hundred new residents will be living in the downtown. It is likely that new downtown housing will be more compact and with less outdoor space than typical single family homes. Inevitably this will result in park demands that don't currently exist. Meeting these needs is a great opportunity to further develop a well designed and well connected park and open space system. Ila Illustrative Master Plan: East and West Bridge Park Recommendations • Redesign East and West Bridge park to include an amphitheater, water feature, riverfront access, picnicking, and additional space for passive park use. • Improve Front Street Park to include improved boat landing and space for nature oriented programming. • Connect the two Bridge Parks with Front Street Park with improved pathways and trails. Design all three parks as a single park with multiple uses. • Provide access to the islands with a seasonal bridge • Create small pocket parks mid block on Broadway to offer plazas that connect to parking lots in the middle of the block. • Redesign Walnut Street between River Street and Broadway as a special street that can be closed and used for festivals and events throughout the year. • Consider all sidewalks for opportunities to enhance greenery and public art. Emphasize Walnut Street, River Street and Broadway as the main pedestrian corridors in Downtown. • Use public art throughout the parks and corridors to distinguish Downtown as a place of cultural expression and celebration. • Work closely with local businesses, residents (new and existing) to ensure local parks and open spaces are appropriately designed and programmed for their varied needs. • Modify the Embracing Downtown Plan that recommends off street bike paths on Pine Street. In lieu of this off-street path, create north / south bike access to the river along Walnut and Cedar through a complete streets policy. Encourage bicycle crossing of Pine Street at 4th, River and 7th Street. • Maintain sidewalks and paths along TH25 City of Monticello Downtown Small Area Plan I Character Areas Frameworks: Circulation and Access A complete network of flexible streets that favors the needs of residents, businesses, and visitors. 01, / 7- 7 7z �7 0 Traffic Calming IM11 Improved Pedestrian Crossing AW (J4 Signalized Intersection F� Access Way © Surface Parking - - - Interstate 94 mmm= Pine Street (MN 25) ', mmm= Broadway Street (CSAH 75) Pedestrian Promenade to River Add Sidewalks to Complete Grid General Approach The design of the streets (and the full right of ways) in downtown have a significant bearing on how downtown functions and feels. The rights-of-way in the Downtown should be designed to create a comfortable and safe physical environment that encourages a range of activities and development types. The Plan recommendations, therefore, favor a high quality, well-connected, and flexible street system that facilitates all users of downtown - especially those who are using and not passing through Downtown. With two main roads bisecting downtown, traffic volumes are relatively high. This provides an opportunity to capture additional business downtown, but it also can have a deleterious impact on the pedestrian and business environment in some locations. Recognizing this situation, previous Plans have emphasized Walnut Street as a main pedestrian connection to the River (not Pine Street). This Plan supports that idea and offers several ways in which that can be further achieved. This Plan departs from previous Plans in that it also encourages pedestrian activity on streets other than Walnut - this includes, Broadway, Pine Street and Cedar. While the Plan recognizes the regional function of Broadway and Pine, the Plan strives to balance this function with the local needs of community connectivity, aesthetics, pedestrian safety, and multi -modal travel. Successful Downtowns are not just easy to get to, they are pleasant to be in and to stay for multiple reasons. Therefore, this Plan, discourages future road widenings that would have further negative impacts on pedestrians Downtown - especially along the primary pedestrian corridors and districts. In lieu of road widenings, the Plan champions an well connected and balanced urban street grid system that can be programmed to flex and contract as needed to meet all the needs of Downtown. Accomplishing this goal will require a series of smaller interventions (signal timing, street connections, traffic controls, traffic calming, time -of -day -parking restrictions, modified property access, etc.) in lieu of wholesale street widening that would likely have a negative physical impact on the built environment of Downtown. The Plan also supports a street network where the Level of Service for pedestrians, transit riders, and cyclists are considered on equal terms to those of motorists and delay measurements from modelling are considered as a portion of overall average trip, not in isolation. Recommendations • Connect Walnut Street to River Street • Maintain the River Street / Pine Street signal as the formal entrance to Downtown and an important pedestrian connection across Pine Street. • Add a traffic signal at 4th and Pine to help balance the grid and turning movements at the Pine / Broadway Intersection. • Modify Walnut / Broadway and Cedar / Walnut Broadway intersection to prioritize pedestrian crossings and access to the river. • Narrow the travel lanes on Walnut Street, add parallel parking, where possible and ensure continuous safe and pleasant sidewalks. • Add sidewalks at the perimeter of blocks where they are not currently present • Discourage direct property access to Pine Street; favoring the side streets wherever possible with through -block lanes or easements. • Allow direct property access to Block 52 from Pine Street in order to reduce volumes at the Pine / Broadway intersection. • Discourage deceleration lanes; encourage speeds that do not require them. • Consider traffic calming at River Street and Locust (or Linn) to prevent excessive speeds - similar to River Street and Cedar Street as an example City of Monticello Downtown Small Area Plan I Character Areas N Parking Recommendations Strategy Priority #1 Maximize use of existing parking supply Strategically invest in information and technology Improve mobility options to reduce parking demand Simplify and leverage the zoning code Recommendation Create a parking program that focuses on creating available spaces for different user groups. Pilot a shared parking program in which private parking is shared with the "public." Enhance pedestrian access to existing parking lots by developing small pocket parks on Broadway Expand and clarify on -street parking supply on all blocks in downtown. Invest in and implements a comprehensive parking signage and wayfinding system. Continually monitor occupancy, availability and utilization of parking throughout downtown Complete the sidewalk system in Downtown to make walking more comfortable. Encourage bicycle access to Downtown with bike racks and clearly designated bike routes. Revise zoning code to better support walkable development in the Downtown core. Revise the zoning code to incentivize sharing of parking and underground parking for residential buildings. Require Transportation Demand Management program for all development above a certain size. Adjust on street regulations and operations to maximize flexibility Enhance parking administration and at the curb operations Establish formal collaboration between the City, County, and other parking stakeholders. Provide Additional public parking as Strategically invest in public and shared parking supply in key needed locations. Key Principles for New Parking Supply • Ensure that parking is shared and open to the public to the greatest degree possible. • Manage new parking as part of the larger system so that prices and regulations primarily incentivize use by long-term parkers. If off street parking is more expensive than on street parking, people will continue to circle and create congestion. • Include technology and wayfinding that makes parking easy to locate and use. • Contribute to the downtown environment by supporting strong urban design, pedestrian access and safety, and promote street activity via ground floor uses. Specific Block By Block Recommendations Block 52: • provide 50 surface spaces for public use mid block when developing north half of block • locate residential parking underground • restripe Walnut Street with wider sidewalks for short term parking • provide short term on -street parking on River Street • expand public surface lot (50 spc) to south side of block when redeveloped. Block 51 • combine surface lots midblock • locate residential parking underground • provide short term on -street parking on River Street • provide short term on -street parking on Locust Street Block 35 • expand mid -block lot (15 spc)when redeveloping south west corner of block. • consider a midblock parking structure. This would require the re-routing of midblock utilities in order to preserve space for housing or other development to face the street. • locate residential parking underground Block 36 • maintain and expand mid block lot (15 spc) when redeveloping southwest corner of block • locate residential parking underground • provide short term on -street parking on 3rd Street Other • work with property owners on blocks 31, 32, 18,17 to create shared parking arrangements City of Monticello Downtown Small Area Plan I Character Areas N MINUTES SPECIAL MEETING — MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, September 10, 2018 — 5:45 p.m. Academy Room City Hall - Monticello Community Center Present: Brian Stumpf, Jim Davidson, Bill Fair, Charlotte Gabler, Lloyd Hilgart Absent: None Others: City staff. Jeff O'Neill, Wayne Oberg, Ann Mosack, Ron Hackenmueller, Shibani Bisson, Rachel Leonard, Jim Thares, Tom Pawelk, Tracy Ergen, Angela Schumann, and Jennifer Schreiber 1. Call to Order Mayor Brian Stumpf called the special meeting to order at 5:45 p.m. 2. Budget Discussion Wayne Oberg, Finance Director, gave a review of the proposed 2019 preliminary tax levy, which is on the regular City Council meeting agenda for approval. The presentation included information on tax base changes, tax capacity values and rates, and the debt service levy. Mr. Oberg mentioned that two parcels of Xcel Energy combined had a decrease in valuation of $17 million. Wayne Oberg noted that the impact items were added to the budget. These items are $30,000 for Arts Consultant, $45,000 for Comprehensive Plan Update; and $18,000 for Pay Equity Study. Angela Schumann mentioned that the EDA is reviewing whether or not to fund portion of the Arts Consultant and the Comprehensive Plan Update. 3. Adjournment By consensus the meeting was adjourned at 6:21 p.m. Recorder: Jennifer Schreiber Approved: Attest: City Administrator City Council Special Meeting Minutes—September 10, 2018 REGULAR MEETING — MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, September 10, 2018 — 6:30 p.m. Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center Present: Mayor Brian Stumpf, Jim Davidson, Bill Fair, Charlotte Gabler, and Lloyd Hilgart Absent: None 1. General Business A. Call to Order & Pledge of Allegiance Mayor Stumpf called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. B. Approval of Agenda Councilmember Fair moved approval of the agenda. Councilmember Davidson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. C. Special Meeting Minutes from August 27, 2018 Councilmember Gabler moved approval of the special meeting minutes of August 27, 2018. Councilmember Hilgart seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Regular Meeting Minutes from August 27, 2018 Councilmember Gabler moved approval of the regular meeting minutes of August 27, 2018. Councilmember Davidson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. D. Citizen Comments Nancy McCaffrey, Park & Recreation board member expressed her support for the city continuing with the Arts Initiative by retaining the Arts Consultant in 2019. E. Public Service Announcements • IEDC Breakfast — Manufacturing Appreciation Breakfast will be held on October 3, 2018. • Absentee/Early Voting begins Friday, September 21, 2018. • Construction Update — Shibani Bisson, WSB Engineer, provided an update on the following: 1. Responded to questions on the Chelsea Road Improvement Project relating to when Chelsea Road would be open to through traffic. Ms. Bisson noted that the roadway is paved and the final lift is anticipated to occur in October when the Fallon Avenue Overpass contractor is done hauling material for that project. The round -a -bout at Chelsea Road and Fallon Avenue has curb and gutter and it is anticipated to be paved within the next two weeks. Therefore, Chelsea Road could be open by the end of September to through traffic, however, there will be intermittent closings for the final lift, City Council Minutes — September 10, 2018 Page 1 1 4 striping, and other miscellaneous items. The intent was to keep Chelsea Road closed until the Fallon Avenue overpass project was complete in mid-November. Ms. Bisson will need to check with the contractor to see if Chelsea Road could be opened before that, as we want to make sure the road is safe for drivers and construction crews. The trail along Chelsea Road at the future Fire Station location is not being paved at this time because it will be impacted by the project. 2. In regard to the Fallon Avenue Overpass project, grading and utility work is continuing on 7th Street, Washington, and Fallon Avenue. There is a mock-up in place of the decorative stamped concrete at Chelsea and Fallon if someone wants to view it. Mayor Stumpf expressed his concern for the level of traffic on School Boulevard. He requested that staff contact Wright County Sheriff's office to discuss options to address the levels of traffic at peak times in the morning and the afternoon (near the school). F. Council Liaison Updates • IEDC — Mayor Stumpf noted that a draft copy of the Business and Employer survey report was provided. Jim Thares noted that this will be given to the EDA for review and then the City Council. • Planning Commission — The meeting was cancelled. There was joint meeting with the City Council to discuss downtown items. • BCOL — Councilmember Fair provided an update on: camping facility and possible grant funding; ballfields and impact on use of park; and events. • Highway 25 Coalition — Mayor Stumpf commented that there has not been a decision made on decisions relating to future river crossing. This item has been tabled due to disagreement. This may be tabled until after the first of the year. G. Department Updates • Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator, gave an update on the following: 1. Xcel Energy Community Breakfast is on September 19 from 7:30 — 9 a.m. 2. Xcel Energy met with the city and the county on legislation relating to use of production of facilities for establishing value. Mr. O'Neill will be contacting the Coalition of Utility Cities to work on legislation for next year. 3. Integrated Resource Plan is on track as it relates to resource planning for Xcel Energy. 2. Consent Agenda: Councilmember Fair moved approval of the Consent Agenda. Councilmember Gabler seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. A. Consideration of approving the payment of bills. Recommendation: Approved the bill and purchase card registers for a total amount of $1,431,551.01. City Council Minutes — September 10, 2018 Page 2 14 B. Consideration of approving new hires/departures. Recommendation: Approved the hires for Liquor Store and MCC and the terminations for MCC and Liquor Store. C. Consideration of approving the sale/disposal of surplus city property. Recommendation: No report this cycle. D. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2018-75 accepting donations of $100 for Farmers Market — Power of Produce and $750 for Industry of the Year. Recommendation: Adopted Resolution 2018-75 accepting the donations. E. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2018-76 declaring costs to be assessed, ordering preparation of assessment roll, and calling for an assessment hearing on October 8, 2018, to adopt assessments for Chelsea Road Utility and Street Improvements, City Project 17C001. Recommendation: Adopted Resolution 2018-76 declaring costs to be assessed, ordering preparation of assessment roll, and calling for the assessment hearing for October 8, 2018 for the Chelsea Road Utility and Street Improvements, City Project No. 17C001. F. Consideration of approving a request for a PUD (Planned Unit Development) adjustment to accommodate changes in phasing of site improvements for the Affordable Storage site. Applicant: Keith Burnham, KB Properties/Affordable Housing. Recommendation: Adopted Resolution 2018-77 approving an adjustment to the PUD for Affordable Storage per the conditions as identified in Exhibit Z. 3. Public Hearings: None. 4. Regular Agenda: A. Consideration of adontina Resolution 2018-78 approving a special benefit levv by the Citv of Monticello Economic Development Authority and accepting_ the EDA 2019 budget Angela Schumann, Community Development Director, provided a brief update. The proposed 2019 HRA levy of $348,000 is an increase of 7.7% over the 2018 levy. It was noted that a majority of the levy is intended to fund housing and redevelopment activities. Councilmember Fair moved to adopt as proposed Resolution 2018-78 approving a special benefit levy by the City of Monticello Economic Development Authority and accepting the preliminary EDA 2019 budget. Councilmember Davidson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. B. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2018-79 setting the 2019 Citv of Monticello's preliminary tax levy Wayne Oberg, Finance Director, presented the preliminary 2019 property tax levy. Included in the presentation were tax base rates, history, and changes. The preliminary tax levy must be certified to Wright County by September 30, 2018. City Council Minutes — September 10, 2018 Page 3 14 The City Council will adopt the final tax levy on December 10, 2018. The presented preliminary tax levy is $9,962,000 which is an increase of 4.3% from 2018. Councilmember Fair questioned whether the impact items were included within this levy number. Wayne Oberg responded that the Arts Consultant, Pay Equity Study, and Comprehensive Plan Update were included. The splash pad will be absorbed by current levy is the project comes to fruition. Mayor Stumpf reminded the council and the public that the levy can always be lowered in December but cannot be higher than what is approved today. Councilmember Fair moved approval of Resolution 2018-79 setting the 2019 preliminary property tax levy at $9,962,000. Councilmember Gabler seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. 6. Adiournment: By consensus, the meeting was adjourned at 7:08 p.m. Recorder: Jennifer Schreiber Approved: Attest: City Administrator City Council Minutes — September 10, 2018 Page 4 14 City Council Agenda: 09/24/2018 2A. Consideration of avvrovin2 vavment of bills (WO) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: City staff submits the attached bill registers and purchasing card registers for approval by Council. The bill registers contain all invoices processed and the purchasing card registers contain all card purchases made since the last Council meeting. Subject to MN Statutes, most invoices require Council approval prior to releasing checks for payment. The day following Council approval, payments will be released unless directed otherwise. A credit purchasing agreement and policy was approved by Council initially and card purchases must comply with the policy. If Council has no questions or comments on the bill and purchase card registers, these can be approved with the consent agenda. If requested, this item can be removed from consent and discussed prior to making a motion for approval. Al. Budget Impact: None A2. Staff Workload Impact: No additional work required. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the bill and purchase card registers for a total amount of $2,450,996.68. 2. Motion to approve the registers with changes directed by Council. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends Alternative #1 or #2, per direction of Council. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • Bill registers and Purchase Card registers Accounts Payable Computer Check Proof List by Vendor User: Debbie.Davidson Printed: 09/18/2018 - 1:53PM Batch: 00201.09.2018 - 201.09.2018 US Bank Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Moiiii6effo Y Reference Vendor: 4263 CAYAN Check Sequence: 1 ACH Enabled: True 8/31/2018 August 2018 (15,43 1) Transaction Fee 1,080.17 09/15/2018 609-49754-443980 8/31/2018 August 2018 (3) Genius Service Fee - cc machin 89.85 09/15/2018 609-49754-424100 Check Total: 1,170.02 Vendor: 3241 LINCOLN FINANCIAL GROUP Check Sequence: 2 ACH Enabled: True 9/1/2018 September 2018 1,809.50 09/15/2018 101-00000-217066 Check Total: 1,809.50 Vendor: 4732 MONEY MOVERS, INC. Check Sequence: 3 ACH Enabled: True 112061 Fitness Rewards - August 2018 40.00 09/15/2018 226-45122-430900 Check Total: 40.00 Vendor: 1426 CITY OF MONTICELLO Check Sequence: 4 ACH Enabled: True UB July 2018 5002 - 1510 Hart Blvd sprinkler 54.10 09/15/2018 101-43120-438200 UB July 2018 5003 - 1460 Hart Blvd sprinkler 55.57 09/15/2018 101-43120-438200 UB July 2018 5005 - 822 Hart Blvd sprinkler 139.85 09/15/2018 101-43120-438200 UB July 2018 5026 - Ellison Park 461.93 09/15/2018 101-45201-438200 UB July 2018 5248 - Bridge Park E. sprinkler 331.22 09/15/2018 101-45201-438200 UB July 2018 5249 - Bridge Park W. sprinkler 238.81 09/15/2018 101-45201-438200 UB July 2018 5250 - Bridge Park W. 68.17 09/15/2018 101-45201-438200 UB July 2018 5569 - Freeway Park 771.55 09/15/2018 101-45201-438200 UB July 2018 5637 - Dog Park 5.45 09/15/2018 101-45201-438200 UB July 2018 7224 - WWTP 1,766.40 09/15/2018 602-49480-438200 UB July 2018 7256-003 - 349 Broadway W 14.38 09/15/2018 213-46301-438200 UB July 2018 7256-005 - 255 Broadway E 14.38 09/15/2018 213-46301-438200 UB July 2018 7256-006 - 112 River St. W 14.38 09/15/2018 213-46301-438200 UB July 2018 7441 - 200 Broadway W sprinkler 16.46 09/15/2018 101-43120-438200 UB July 2018 7885 - Help Center 23.63 09/15/2018 217-41990-438200 UB July 2018 8086 - 4th St. Warming House 14.38 09/15/2018 101-45201-438200 UB July 2018 8114 - Hi -Way Liquor 287.62 09/15/2018 609-49754-438200 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (09/18/2018 - 1:53 PM) Page 1 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number UB July 2018 8117 - MCC 1,337.18 09/15/2018 226-45126-438200 UB July 2018 8119 - Fire Station 108.07 09/15/2018 101-42200-438200 UB July 2018 8120 - Bldg. Inspec. Garage 14.38 09/15/2018 101-41940-438200 UB July 2018 8177 - Library 241.55 09/15/2018 101-45501-438200 UB July 2018 8394 - Riverside Cemetery sprinkler 5.45 09/15/2018 651-49010-438200 UB July 2018 8488 - Hillcrest Park sprinkler 165.58 09/15/2018 101-45201-438200 UB July 2018 8528- NSP Monti Softball Fld. 1,598.08 09/15/2018 101-45203-438200 UB July 2018 8533 - Chelsea Rd Lift Sta. sprinkler 231.51 09/15/2018 602-49490-438200 UB July 2018 8621 - Fenning Round -a -bout sprinkler 31.99 09/15/2018 101-43120-438200 UB July 2018 8622 - Pioneer Park bathroom 23.49 09/15/2018 101-45201-438200 UB July 2018 8631 - Animal Shelter 14.38 09/15/2018 101-42700-438200 UB July 2018 8903 - PW Shop/Clerical 204.52 09/15/2018 101-43127-438200 UB July 2018 8904 - PW Vehicle Storage 12.65 09/15/2018 101-43127-438200 UB July 2018 8905 - PW Office 352.51 09/15/2018 101-43127-438200 UB July 2018 8906 - PW sprinklers 8.11 09/15/2018 101-43127-438200 UB July 2018 10063 - Front Street Pk sprinkler 101.25 09/15/2018 101-45201-438200 UB July 2018 10128 - 118 6th St. W office facility 27.28 09/15/2018 101-41941-438200 UB July 2018 10267 - Comm. Garden 20.28 09/15/2018 226-45127-438200 UB July 2018 13953 - Hwy 25/SE Broadway sprinkler 21.58 09/15/2018 101-43120-438200 UB July 2018 14476 - Ellison House 17.67 09/15/2018 101-45201-438200 UB July 2018 14522 - Hillside cemetery sprinkler 184.69 09/15/2018 101-45201-438200 UB July 2018 14915 - 4100 1/2 Cedar St. sprinkler 8.16 09/15/2018 101-43120-438200 Check Total: 9,008.64 Vendor: 2811 US BANK CORPORATE PMT SYSTEM Check Sequence: 5 09062018 Holiday - (2) 5 lb. ice cubes- House Burn 225 E 3.98 09/15/2018 101-42200-421990 09062018 DSG - Xcel Ballflds- (10) SCH80 PVC Nip 8.50 09/15/2018 101-45203-421990 09062018 Fastenal - (68) CB 3/8-16 x 1.25 Z Keg 8.61 09/15/2018 101-43120-421990 09062018 Monti Napa - gas cap 9.89 09/15/2018 101-45201-422100 09062018 Runnings - #103 - bulk nuts; bolts; washers 10.73 09/15/2018 101-43120-421990 09062018 Home Depot - (2) angle broom 11.94 09/15/2018 101-43130-421990 09062018 Monti Napa - (3) Napagold filters 12.18 09/15/2018 101-45201-422110 09062018 Fastenal -(50) galv. pieces for fence 12.82 09/15/2018 101-43120-422400 09062018 MN Equip- inground hoist- #50H steel cha 17.10 09/15/2018 101-43127-422300 09062018 Marties - (10) perennials 23.00 09/15/2018 101-43130-421990 09062018 Fastenal -(19) cup pt. 1.73 09/15/2018 101-43160-421530 09062018 Grady's - (2) clamp poly 3/8 2.99 09/15/2018 601-49440-422990 09062018 Runnings -(2) shaft set collar 7.78 09/15/2018 101-43120-422100 09062018 Grainger - (2) shaft collar clamp- heat lance 8.20 09/15/2018 101-43120-422100 09062018 Home Depot - (2) 80 lb. concrete mix 8.60 09/15/2018 601-49440-421990 09062018 Keen - BR boots 2018 - $200 - $190 warranty 10.00 09/15/2018 601-49440-420650 09062018 Home Depot - (4) 60 lb. concrete mix 12.40 09/15/2018 601-49440-421990 Reference ACH Enabled: True AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (09/18/2018 - 1:53 PM) Page 2 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 09062018 Home Depot - 92.6 lb Quikrite Portland Type I -I 12.75 09/15/2018 101-45201-421650 09062018 Mills Fleet Farm- (11) bushing 13.09 09/15/2018 101-45201-421650 09062018 Grady's - (2) 10 pk pond & stone; fasteners 14.21 09/15/2018 101-43120-421990 09062018 Home Depot - gate valve; gal bushing; etc. 14.70 09/15/2018 101-45201-421650 09062018 Cub -resale (30) limes 20.70 09/15/2018 609-49750-425500 09062018 Monti Napa - #103 - Hydraulic filter 25.68 09/15/2018 101-43120-422100 09062018 Fastenal - (2) jersey gloves; (2) Nit.0 gloves 27.14 09/15/2018 101-45201-421650 09062018 Cub - resale (30) limes; (7) lemons 27.63 09/15/2018 609-49750-425500 09062018 Home Depot - squeegee w/ handle 27.90 09/15/2018 609-49754-421990 09062018 Moon Donuts - (2) doz. donuts -house bum 28.55 09/15/2018 101-42200-421990 09062018 Fastenal - (200) foam ear plugs 37.10 09/15/2018 101-43127-421990 09062018 Home Depot - 10x12 tarp; (4) flooring knife 43.86 09/15/2018 101-43120-422500 09062018 Zee Medical - first aid supplies - Hi -Way Liquor 43.90 09/15/2018 609-49754-421990 09062018 Mc Master -Carr- (2) Tubing for Well Houses 45.31 09/15/2018 601-49440-422990 09062018 Office Max pens; dry erase; office supplies - Fire 48.98 09/15/2018 101-42200-421990 09062018 Nighthawk - Sept. 2018 security monitor/cellulae 49.95 09/15/2018 101-42200-431900 09062018 Walmart - B.R. boots - 1/2 24.98 09/15/2018 601-49440-420650 09062018 Walmart - B.R. boots - 1/2 24.98 09/15/2018 602-49490-420650 09062018 Cub - resale (60) limes; (12) lemons 53.28 09/15/2018 609-49750-425500 09062018 General Rental -power trowel; (4) float blade 54.50 09/15/2018 101-45201-421650 09062018 Home Depot -(15) 60 lb. concrete mix; 25 pk coy 56.38 09/15/2018 101-45201-421650 09062018 Monti Napa - (2) oil filter; (2) air filter 57.14 09/15/2018 101-43127-422120 09062018 Cintas - mat service inv. #4008666189; 4008427 118.60 09/15/2018 609-49754-431990 09062018 K1 Tailors - (4) shirts; (4) blazers; (1) jacket Clea 58.73 09/15/2018 609-49754-431990 09062018 Monti Napa - (2) Air Filters 61.54 09/15/2018 101-45201-422110 09062018 Marties - 25# per Rye- River Mill Pond 63.00 09/15/2018 101-43130-422500 09062018 Monti Napa - #150- (3) MMM 08609 66.03 09/15/2018 101-43120-422100 09062018 DISH - 9/2-10/1/18 71.64 09/15/2018 609-49754-432500 09062018 Home Depot -ZPARKS-FSTONE- (12) steel stal 73.05 09/15/2018 229-45202-453010 09062018 DSG - 100 ft. pcv - round -a -bout Chelsea 76.10 09/15/2018 101-43120-422500 09062018 Home Depot -(20) 60 lb. concrete. 80.97 09/15/2018 101-45201-421650 09062018 Monti Napa - (2) light bulbs for trucks; hitch pin 13.03 09/15/2018 101-42200-422110 09062018 Dominos - pizza for house burn- 255 E. Broadwa 82.56 09/15/2018 101-42200-421990 09062018 Dacotah Paper - (2) cs. t. tissue 94.00 09/15/2018 101-43120-421990 09062018 Home Depot - (2) plywood; (10) 10'2x4 98.20 09/15/2018 101-45201-421650 09062018 NBP - disinfec. wipes; (3) creamer 106.76 09/15/2018 609-49754-421990 09062018 Sherwin Williams - (10) 5 gal. white 108.68 09/15/2018 101-45203-421990 09062018 Runnings -chain saw- bar rollomatic; tune-up kit 108.98 09/15/2018 101-46102-440440 09062018 Etrailer.com - square jack w/ footplate 130.29 09/15/2018 101-45201-422100 09062018 Marties - (8) 17-17-17 fertilizer 131.20 09/15/2018 101-45201-421600 09062018 General Rental - Bobcat Rental 132.96 09/15/2018 101-43130-421990 09062018 General Rental A00 lb. propane - crack filler ton 135.98 09/15/2018 101-43120-421990 09062018 Monti Napa - #214 -radiator 136.73 09/15/2018 101-45201-422110 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (09/18/2018 - 1:53 PM) Page 3 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 09062018 Paypal- Fall Mntc. Expo (5) 10/4/18 150.00 09/15/2018 101-45201-433100 09062018 Mills Fleet Farm- 16C006-CONSTR- (2) poly pi 159.98 09/15/2018 400-43300-459018 09062018 Sherwin Williams - (15) 5 gal. br. white 163.02 09/15/2018 101-45203-421990 09062018 Streichers - (4) Taclite Pro Pants 168.00 09/15/2018 101-42200-421120 09062018 General Rental ZPARKS-FSTONE -trencher atu 169.00 09/15/2018 229-45202-453010 09062018 Home Depot - (20) metal reg. lath 169.00 09/15/2018 101-45204-421990 09062018 Runnings -(2) Stellar Tac Boot 169.98 09/15/2018 101-42200-421120 09062018 Monti Napa - battery 174.84 09/15/2018 602-49490-422100 09062018 Trueman Welters - (2) cs. 15W405G oil 176.46 09/15/2018 101-43120-422100 09062018 Paypal- MN FA- (8) MN Fall Mntc. Expo 10/3/1 240.00 09/15/2018 101-43120-433100 09062018 DSG - 60' pipe - cu k soft 255.88 09/15/2018 601-49440-421990 09062018 Monti Napa - (25) asst. filters 274.87 09/15/2018 101-43127-422120 09062018 General Rental - Bobcat Rental 275.00 09/15/2018 101-43130-421990 09062018 Boyer - #109 - (2) chamber bu; (2) chamber 24 293.18 09/15/2018 101-43120-422110 09062018 Sherwin Williams - (30) 5 gal. brite white 326.04 09/15/2018 101-45203-421990 09062018 General Rental -chip seal project- Tree S[ade To, 373.75 09/15/2018 101-43120-440990 09062018 Cintas - (18) shirts; 381.24 09/15/2018 609-49754-421110 09062018 Cintas - mat service inv. #4008941664 66.14 09/15/2018 609-49754-431990 09062018 Aramark - July 2018 uniforms- Parks 80.11 09/15/2018 101-45201-441700 09062018 Aramark - July 2018 uniforms- Sewer 80.11 09/15/2018 602-49490-441700 09062018 Aramark - July 2018 uniforms- Water 80.11 09/15/2018 601-49440-441700 09062018 Aramark - July 2018 uniforms- Streets 80.12 09/15/2018 101-43120-441700 09062018 Aramark - July 2018 Shop towels 80.11 09/15/2018 101-43127-421990 09062018 Spayer Depot -Utility 6-Hypro Piston Pump 474.50 09/15/2018 101-42200-422110 09062018 MN Fire Svc. Cert. Brd- (19) Recertification 475.00 09/15/2018 101-42200-443700 09062018 General Rental -4x8 sign; (4) lighted towable- C 525.55 09/15/2018 101-43120-440990 09062018 Arctic Glacer - resale -#1956822913; 823204; 82 603.18 09/15/2018 609-49750-425500 09062018 Boyer - #105 - Asy. pipe; muff inlet; ss flex; clai 742.20 09/15/2018 101-43120-422110 09062018 Marties - adopt a park -East Bridge Gardeners M; 754.41 09/15/2018 101-45201-440900 09062018 Office Depot- 12pk 9v batteries 25.89 09/15/2018 101-43110-421990 09062018 Amazon-Logitech Wireless Keyboard 36.50 09/15/2018 101-43110-421990 09062018 Runnings -(50) elec. fence post 59.50 09/15/2018 101-45201-421650 09062018 Runnings -digging bar; pry bar; (15) mount. tape 60.97 09/15/2018 101-45201-421650 09062018 Home Depot -Dewalt 300' tape; (10) metal lath; 1 132.29 09/15/2018 101-45201-421650 09062018 Environmental Equip. -suction wall liner; (2) suc 757.00 09/15/2018 101-43120-422100 09062018 Eagle Engraving -(6) asst. retirement plaques- Fi 860.45 09/15/2018 101-42200-421990 09062018 NBP-(2)cs. paper plates; (2) suckers; (3) can lnr 870.76 09/15/2018 609-49754-421990 09062018 Diamond Vogel - (10) 5 gal white 879.00 09/15/2018 101-43120-421510 09062018 Arctic Glacer - resale -#1956821509; 1809; 2211 906.40 09/15/2018 609-49750-425500 09062018 Environmental Equip. 4150- (2) belt -blower 964.51 09/15/2018 101-43120-422100 09062018 Midwest Landscapes- ZPARKS-FSTONE-(4) Si 1,000.00 09/15/2018 229-45202-453010 09062018 Dennis' Service- #204-(2) rear brake drums;fr br; 1,103.00 09/15/2018 101-45201-440440 09062018 Allina Health- qtr. bill- keep medicals up to date 1,232.09 09/15/2018 101-42200-431990 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (09/18/2018 - 1:53 PM) Page 4 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 09062018 Site-One-16C006-CONSTR- Fallon Overpass 1,244.47 09/15/2018 400-43300-459018 09062018 US Bluebook- Hach Flouride & CL2 Monitor 1,414.15 09/15/2018 601-49440-421990 09062018 Central Wood- ZPARKS-FSTONE-(100) Rec-St 1,715.00 09/15/2018 229-45202-453010 09062018 Ameripride - August 2018 uniforms- Parks 58.53 09/15/2018 101-45201-441700 09062018 Ameripride - August 2018 uniforms- Sewer 58.54 09/15/2018 602-49490-441700 09062018 Ameripride - August 2018 uniforms- Water 58.54 09/15/2018 601-49440-441700 09062018 Ameripride - August 2018 uniforms- Streets 58.54 09/15/2018 101-43120-441700 09062018 Ameripride - August 2018 Shop towels 58.54 09/15/2018 101-43127-421990 09062018 WHCE - Sunset Ponds Lift Station 7/1-8/1/18 % 148.10 09/15/2018 602-49490-438100 09062018 WHCE - 1645 & 1675 CR 39 39.16 09/15/2018 602-49490-438100 09062018 WHCE - DMV 89.70 09/15/2018 217-41990-438100 09062018 WHCE - 2171 W. River St - Parks 36.45 09/15/2018 101-45201-438100 09062018 WHCE - 5980 Jason Ave. NE 19.95 09/15/2018 601-49440-438100 09062018 WHCE - MCC 27.95 09/15/2018 226-45126-438100 09062018 WHCE - 207 Chelsea Rd. 32.95 09/15/2018 601-49440-438100 09062018 WHCE - 209 Cedar St 29.95 09/15/2018 601-49440-438100 09062018 WHCE - 132 E. Broadway 29.95 09/15/2018 601-49440-438100 09062018 WHCE - 107 River St. W 19.95 09/15/2018 101-45201-438100 09062018 WHCE - Hi -Way Liquor Sept. 2018 21.42 09/15/2018 609-49754-438100 09062018 WHCE - MCCr Sept. 2018 19.95 09/15/2018 226-45126-431900 09062018 WHCE - 200 Dundas Rd.- Sept. 2018 29.95 09/15/2018 601-49440-431900 09062018 WHCE - 909 golf Course Rd 19.95 09/15/2018 101-43110-431900 09062018 WHCE - General Street Lighting 1,369.17 09/15/2018 101-43160-438100 09062018 Zep - doz. Zep Aerosol; 5gl Zep Blue Marvel 151.50 09/15/2018 101-43127-421600 09062018 Paypal- Fall Mntc. Expo (2) 10/3/18 60.00 09/15/2018 601-49440-433100 09062018 Paypal- Fall Mute. Expo (2) 10/3/18 60.00 09/15/2018 602-49490-433100 09062018 DSG - ZPARKS-FSTONE- backflow preventer; 321.91 09/15/2018 229-45202-453010 09062018 DSG - ZPARKS-FSTONE- 100' pcv pipe 20ft.; 80.55 09/15/2018 229-45202-453010 09062018 Domino's Pizza - Meal prior to joint PC/CC mee 25.88 09/15/2018 101-41110-433100 09062018 Domino's Pizza - Meal prior to joint PC/CC mee 25.87 09/15/2018 213-46301-433100 09062018 Cub - Employee picnic food 230.81 09/15/2018 101-41800-443990 09062018 Monti Napa - battery for backup generator 119.22 09/15/2018 226-45126-422990 09062018 Dominos - pizza for elections 18.48 09/15/2018 101-41410-421990 09062018 Monti Napa - part for pool area 138.80 09/15/2018 226-45126-422990 09062018 Montcelloi Printing - laminating posters 112.00 09/15/2018 101-41940-443990 09062018 Holiday - 9.001 gallons of fuel at 2.799 per galla 25.19 09/15/2018 217-41990-421200 09062018 Target - certificate frame 21.46 09/15/2018 217-41990-421990 09062018 Home Depot - fittings for carpet cleaner, steel wi 12.84 09/15/2018 226-45126-422990 09062018 Grady's - specialty screws for weight lifting mac 5.36 09/15/2018 226-45126-422990 09062018 Marries - (63) salt pallet pellets for softener 371.70 09/15/2018 226-45126-422990 09062018 Monti Napa - epoxy for spa, small tool set 47.76 09/15/2018 226-45126-422990 09062018 Home Depot - toilet handle and flapper for womi 18.45 09/15/2018 609-49754-422990 09062018 Home Depot - toilet handle for employee restroo 5.98 09/15/2018 609-49754-422990 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (09/18/2018 - 1:53 PM) Page 5 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 09062018 Walmart - meal for PC special workshop 35.88 09/15/2018 101-41910-443990 09062018 USPS - first class certified mail with return recei 7.41 09/15/2018 101-41910-432200 09062018 Cub - tai chi snacks 7.70 09/15/2018 226-45127-421990 09062018 Walmart - microwave, knives and break room so 118.64 09/15/2018 101-41310-421990 09062018 Holiday - 8.57 gallons of fuel at 2.799 per gallon 23.99 09/15/2018 217-41990-421200 09062018 Cub - meal for EDA meeting 19.97 09/15/2018 213-46301-443990 09062018 Grady's - (8) door stoppers 17.87 09/15/2018 226-45126-422990 09062018 Home Depot - fountain pump for patio, wasp spr 25.80 09/15/2018 226-45126-422990 09062018 Montcelloi Printing - name plates, Ron and Core 26.35 09/15/2018 101-41940-443990 09062018 Holiday - 9.203 gallons of fuel at 2.749 per galla 25.30 09/15/2018 217-41990-421200 09062018 Sams Club - resale Friendship Island snack pack 25.94 09/15/2018 226-45127-421981 09062018 USPS - (1) bklt stamps 10.00 09/15/2018 217-41990-432200 09062018 Grady's - (2) fasteners, hanger mirror clip and he 4.22 09/15/2018 226-45126-422990 09062018 Runnings - toilet lever handle 14.99 09/15/2018 609-49754-422990 09062018 Grady's - (1) shower stall drain, 4 pk fasteners 7.41 09/15/2018 226-45126-422990 09062018 Office Max - election labels 15.29 09/15/2018 101-41410-421990 09062018 Target - (2) cases of water for elections 13.87 09/15/2018 101-41410-421990 09062018 Home Depot - elections (2) ext cords, (2) surge I 67.88 09/15/2018 101-41410-443990 09062018 Target - elections (6) folders 34.74 09/15/2018 101-41410-421990 09062018 Cub - elections meal, bakery rolls 8.99 09/15/2018 101-41410-421990 09062018 Jimmy Johns - elections lunch 52.89 09/15/2018 101-41410-421990 09062018 Target - elections bananas, ice cream snacks 14.41 09/15/2018 101-41410-421990 09062018 Sams Club - elections cookies, chips, peanuts 50.12 09/15/2018 101-41410-421990 09062018 Jimmy Johns - safety prizes 30.00 09/15/2018 101-41800-421990 09062018 Von Hansons - employee picnic food 300.12 09/15/2018 101-41800-443990 09062018 Home Depot - anchors and hinges for concession 29.90 09/15/2018 226-45126-422990 09062018 Walmart - carpet sweeper 28.96 09/15/2018 226-45126-421990 09062018 Walmart - (2) lint rollers, (2) 5 gal water 20.94 09/15/2018 226-45127-421720 09062018 Walmart - snacks and water for Tai Chi 11.86 09/15/2018 226-45127-421990 09062018 Home Depot - roundup weed and grass klr 22.97 09/15/2018 226-45126-422990 09062018 Walmart - employee picnic supplies and food 108.28 09/15/2018 101-41800-443990 09062018 Walmart - employee picnic supplies and prizes 103.70 09/15/2018 101-41800-443990 09062018 Home Depot - wood 2x4 for upstairs 3.28 09/15/2018 226-45126-422990 09062018 Cub - awards for recognition picnic 10+ yrs 250.00 09/15/2018 101-41800-443990 09062018 Holiday - 9.828 gallons of fuel at 2.799 per galla 27.51 09/15/2018 217-41990-421200 09062018 Home Depot - (4) outlet covers 14.68 09/15/2018 226-45126-422990 09062018 Grady's - (3) ft wire, (2) blk & wht letters, qt adb 16.19 09/15/2018 226-45126-422990 09062018 General Rental - CO2 for servicing coils 61.50 09/15/2018 226-45126-422990 09062018 Bettys Pies - meal MPELRA conference 23.77 09/15/2018 101-41800-433100 09062018 Home Depot - a/c coil repair tool 8.96 09/15/2018 226-45126-422990 09062018 Walmart - Friendship Island supplies 54.76 09/15/2018 226-45127-421981 09062018 Sams Club - resale Friendship Island snacks 35.84 09/15/2018 226-45127-421981 09062018 Great Wok - meal, OSHA seminar 10.42 09/15/2018 101-41800-433100 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (09/18/2018 - 1:53 PM) Page 6 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 09062018 Canal Park Brewing - lunch MPELRA conferenc 18.75 09/15/2018 101-41800-433100 09062018 Target - resale concessions 39.56 09/15/2018 226-45125-425410 09062018 Target - tape, hangers, pens, pencils 29.80 09/15/2018 226-45122-421990 09062018 Target - resale romp & stomp socks 23.37 09/15/2018 226-45125-425411 09062018 Walmart - electons supplies and keyboard JS 152.19 09/15/2018 101-41410-421990 09062018 School Outfitters - (10) merit series flip top train 2,532.48 09/15/2018 226-45123-424100 09062018 Dallas Midwest - (30) poly stack chair with glide 2,193.30 09/15/2018 226-45123-424100 09062018 Wall Street Journal - subscription 38.99 09/15/2018 101-41520-443300 09062018 Cintas - mat service, inv #4006900150 20.74 09/15/2018 217-41990-421990 09062018 Cintas - mat service, inv #4006704075 19.60 09/15/2018 101-45501-431990 09062018 Cintas - mat service, inv #4008427571 19.60 09/15/2018 101-45501-431990 09062018 Cintas - mat service, wet mop, and towels inv #, 33.44 09/15/2018 226-45126-431990 09062018 Cintas - mat service, dust mop, twl, jeans, inv #4 47.01 09/15/2018 226-45126-431990 09062018 Amazon -coffee, wipes, duster, bags, candy, creat 228.58 09/15/2018 101-41310-421990 09062018 Solar Traffic Systems -(2) rectangular rapid flash 5,382.00 09/15/2018 101-43120-421990 09062018 NBP - (1) ct plates 84.99 09/15/2018 101-41310-421990 09062018 NBP - (1) bx rubber band, (1) ct knife, (12) pd Ig 146.26 09/15/2018 101-41310-421990 09062018 NBP - calendar, appt book, (3) storage bx, (3) pk 83.81 09/15/2018 217-41990-421990 09062018 Trusted Employers- criminal background checks 23.00 09/15/2018 217-41990-431990 09062018 Trusted Employers- criminal background checks 25.00 09/15/2018 609-49754-431990 09062018 Trusted Employers- criminal background checks 48.00 09/15/2018 226-45122-431990 09062018 Trusted Employers- criminal background checks 23.00 09/15/2018 101-41410-431990 09062018 Trusted Employers- criminal background checks 92.00 09/15/2018 609-49754-431990 09062018 Trusted Employers- criminal background checks 46.00 09/15/2018 217-41990-431990 09062018 Trusted Employers- criminal background checks 21.00 09/15/2018 601-49440-431990 09062018 Trusted Employers- criminal background checks 21.00 09/15/2018 602-49490-431990 09062018 Trusted Employers- criminal background checks 185.00 09/15/2018 101-42200-431990 09062018 Trusted Employers- criminal background checks 23.00 09/15/2018 226-45122-431990 09062018 Amazon - coffee, wireless keyboard 62.43 09/15/2018 101-41310-421990 09062018 NBP - (40) rm paper, (1) ct spoons 163.95 09/15/2018 101-41310-421990 09062018 NBP - pens, forks, plates, ppr towel, cups, envelc 449.72 09/15/2018 101-41310-421990 09062018 NBP - perm markers, stamp, planner, appt book 73.86 09/15/2018 226-45122-421990 09062018 NBP - pens, copy paper, envelopes, add machine 68.83 09/15/2018 217-41990-421990 09062018 Quill Corp -(5) 11x17 copy paper 63.99 09/15/2018 101-41310-421990 09062018 Ausco Design - (8) slide attendant shirts 62.00 09/15/2018 226-45124-421110 09062018 Midland- (2) chargers for two way radios 51.15 09/15/2018 226-45124-421990 09062018 Amazon -(2) portable cd plater w/ earbuds 36.90 09/15/2018 226-45127-421720 09062018 AST Sports -(6) shirts w/embroidery Corey 182.88 09/15/2018 101-42400-421110 09062018 Walmart Check Printing - deposit slips 11.03 09/15/2018 217-41990-421990 09062018 Facebook- farmers market ad 14.73 09/15/2018 226-45127-431992 09062018 Peach Jar -farmers market advertising to kidsclub 100.00 09/15/2018 226-45127-431992 09062018 Amazon - Replacement Ab Straps 27.10 09/15/2018 226-45127-421720 09062018 Amazon - Batteries (2 - 48/pks) 27.98 09/15/2018 226-45122-421990 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (09/18/2018 - 1:53 PM) Page 7 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 09062018 Randys - Monthly Shredding Service (DMV) 20.19 09/15/2018 217-41990-431990 09062018 NBP - Copy Paper 33.50 09/15/2018 226-45122-421990 09062018 Home Depot - Water Filter for Breakroom Refri� 37.86 09/15/2018 226-45126-422990 09062018 Cintas - mat service, dust mop, twl, jeans, inv #4 44.01 09/15/2018 226-45126-431990 09062018 Cintas - mat service, dust mop, twl, jeans, inv #4 44.01 09/15/2018 226-45126-431990 09062018 Cintas - mat service, dust mop, twl, jeans, inv 94 47.01 09/15/2018 226-45126-431990 09062018 Cintas - mat service, dust mop, twl, jeans, inv #4 47.01 09/15/2018 226-45126-431990 09062018 Cintas - mat service, dust mop, twl, jeans, inv #4 47.01 09/15/2018 226-45126-431990 09062018 NBP - Storage Boxes, Pens, Binder Clips, Post I1 47.69 09/15/2018 217-41990-421990 09062018 Amazon - Replacement Easels (2) 59.38 09/15/2018 226-45123-421990 09062018 NBP - Tape, Envelopes, Scissors, Labels 61.79 09/15/2018 101-41310-421990 09062018 Ausco Design - F.I. Staff Shirts (10) 85.00 09/15/2018 226-45127-421110 09062018 Dacotah Paper - Cups, Gloves for Food Service 96.16 09/15/2018 226-45125-421990 09062018 MN Dept Labor - Annual Elevator Operating EL 100.00 09/15/2018 101-41941-431990 09062018 Amazon - Yoga Bolsters (3) 107.10 09/15/2018 226-45127-421720 09062018 MN Secretary of State - Notary Renewal (CG) 120.00 09/15/2018 217-41990-443300 09062018 Electric Motor Warehouse - Motor for Exhaust ii 157.98 09/15/2018 226-45126-422990 09062018 Verizon - June 21 - July 20 35.01 09/15/2018 101-43115-432100 09062018 Verizon - June 21 - July 20 26.02 09/15/2018 101-43120-432100 09062018 Verizon - June 21 - July 20 140.04 09/15/2018 101-42200-432100 09062018 Netbrands Media - Birthday Parry Wristbands (1 202.50 09/15/2018 226-45127-421460 09062018 Strategic Equipment - Silverware for Weddings 214.49 09/15/2018 226-45123-421990 09062018 American Planning Assoc - Upper Midwest Con 300.00 09/15/2018 101-41910-433100 09062018 Inn on Lake Superior - MPELRA Conference (T 332.50 09/15/2018 101-41800-433100 09062018 Commercial Recreation Spec. - Web Crawl Time 409.51 09/15/2018 226-45127-421730 09062018 Delta Airlines - Travel CG to Washington DC -1 442.40 09/15/2018 101-41110-433100 09062018 ThyssenKropp - Quarterly Elevator Maintenance 596.06 09/15/2018 226-45126-431990 09062018 Dacotah Paper - Bathroom/Locker Room Supplii 1,339.54 09/15/2018 226-45126-421990 09062018 Dacotah Paper - Cups @ Ballfields 36.46 09/15/2018 226-45127-421990 09062018 First Net Learning - Online Safety Training 9/14, 1,425.00 09/15/2018 101-41800-431960 09062018 Advanced Disposal - July 2018 38,466.15 09/15/2018 101-43230-438400 09062018 Advanced Disposal - July 2018 - Recycling 13,201.25 09/15/2018 101-43230-438400 09062018 Advanced Disposal - July 2018 - GFEE 1,270.20 09/15/2018 101-43230-438400 09062018 Advanced Disposal - July 2018 35.80 09/15/2018 101-43127-438400 09062018 Advanced Disposal - July 2018 47.74 09/15/2018 101-45201-438400 09062018 Advanced Disposal - July 2018 23.87 09/15/2018 101-45201-438400 09062018 Advanced Disposal - July 2018 113.38 09/15/2018 602-49480-438400 09062018 Advanced Disposal - July 2018 208.87 09/15/2018 226-45126-438400 09062018 Advanced Disposal - July 2018 23.87 09/15/2018 609-49754-438400 09062018 Advanced Disposal - July 2018 23.87 09/15/2018 101-45201-438400 09062018 Advanced Disposal - July 2018 11.93 09/15/2018 101-45501-431990 09062018 Verizon - July 4 - August 3 2.26 09/15/2018 601-49440-432100 09062018 Verizon - July 4 - August 3 2.27 09/15/2018 602-49490-432100 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (09/18/2018 - 1:53 PM) Page 8 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number 09062018 NBP - Tape 13.11 09/15/2018 101-41310-421990 09062018 HP.com - HP Laserjet Enterprise M506DN Neta 569.99 09/15/2018 702-00000-424100 09062018 Cintas - mat service, inv #4008189094 19.47 09/15/2018 217-41990-421990 09062018 Cintas - mat service, inv #4007101633, 4007532 39.20 09/15/2018 101-45501-431990 09062018 Cintas - mat service, inv #4007988628 19.60 09/15/2018 101-45501-431990 09062018 Randys - Monthly Shredding Service (CH) 20.19 09/15/2018 101-41310-431990 09062018 Allianz Travel Insurance - Insurance for Travel C 29.86 09/15/2018 101-41110-433100 09062018 Verizon - July 11 - August 10 31.99 09/15/2018 101-43115-432100 09062018 Amazon - 4 pk dry erase markers 16.53 09/15/2018 101-43110-421990 09062018 Amazon -resp. cleaning wipes; scissors 27.27 09/15/2018 101-43110-421990 09062018 Runnings - (12) engine oil 35.88 09/15/2018 101-46102-421990 09062018 Cub - resale (35) limes; (12) lemons 36.03 09/15/2018 609-49750-425500 09062018 Runnings - 40w elec. ballast; (4) 24 pk water 36.65 09/15/2018 101-42200-421990 09062018 Auto Value - pry bar; FHP Med. horse power 66.79 09/15/2018 101-45201-421650 09062018 BigMouth.com - resale - barware 185.63 09/15/2018 609-49750-425400 09062018 Monti Napa - (15) asst. Filters 274.87 09/15/2018 101-43127-422120 09062018 Amazon - M Leonard Personal Expense Reimbu 4.99 09/15/2018 101-00000-115030 09062018 GoDaddy.com - Renew Domain for - Building B 15.17 09/15/2018 213-46301-443300 09062018 Amazon - M Leonard Personal Expense Reimbu 22.48 09/15/2018 101-00000-115030 09062018 Amazon - Coffee 28.35 09/15/2018 101-41310-421990 09062018 Holiday - J Styrbicky Personal Purchase - Reim1 32.34 09/15/2018 101-00000-115030 09062018 Safe Food Training - Food Safety Training (TH) 75.00 09/15/2018 226-45122-433100 09062018 General Rental - Stanchions for Primary Electim 552.00 09/15/2018 101-41410-421990 09062018 US Bank - Quarterly Rebate -5,007.96 09/15/2018 101-00000-362970 Check Total: 100,200.39 Vendor: 2438 VANCO SERVICES LLC Check Sequence: 6 00009109654 Vanco - Gateway Exchange - August 2018 5.72 09/15/2018 656-00000-202099 00009109654 Vanco - Gateway Exchange - August 2018 59.67 09/15/2018 601-49440-443980 00009109654 Vanco - Gateway Exchange - August 2018 59.67 09/15/2018 602-49490-443980 Check Total: 125.06 Total for Check Run: Total of Number of Checks: 112,353.61 6 Reference ACH Enabled: True The preceding list of bills payable was reviewed and approved for payment. Date: 9/24/18 Approved by Mayor Brian Stumpf AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (09/18/2018 - 1:53 PM) Page 9 Accounts Payable Computer Check Proof List by Vendor User: Debbie.Davidson Printed: 09/19/2018 - 2:01PM Batch: 00203.09.2018 - 203.09.2018 AP Invoice No Description Vendor: 1039 AQUA LOGIC INC 48023 Stenner Feed Tube (2) 48041 Check Filters & UV Strainer ACH Enabled: Check Total: Vendor: 5082 AROPLAX CORP 9/5/2018 Refund Park Rental 190.00 Check Total: Vendor: 3491 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3288807 resale - beer 3290666 resale - beer Check Total: Vendor: 4502 ARVIG 9/8/2018 ACH IT Services - August 2018 False 410.00 Check Total: Vendor: 4556 ANDYAUSTIN 10/26/18 Event Entertainer for Fall Wine Tasting 10/26/18 410.00 Check Total: Vendor: 1062 BEAUDRY OIL COMPANY 380013 (156.4) gal. 1Ow30; (89.7) gal. Ultrapure Def Check Sequence: 3 Check Total: Vendor: 1065 BELLBOY CORPORATION 65821400 09/25/2018 resale- liquor Moiiii6effo Y Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Check Sequence: 1 ACH Enabled: True 212.13 09/25/2018 226-45124-443990 190.00 09/25/2018 226-45124-431990 402.13 Check Sequence: 2 ACH Enabled: False 410.00 09/25/2018 101-45201-347100 410.00 Check Sequence: 3 ACH Enabled: False 64.00 09/25/2018 609-49750-425200 77.20 09/25/2018 609-49750-425200 141.20 Check Sequence: 4 ACH Enabled: True 73.00 09/25/2018 702-00000-431990 73.00 Check Sequence: 5 ACH Enabled: False 300.00 09/25/2018 609-49754-425550 300.00 Check Sequence: 6 ACH Enabled: True 2,177.17 09/25/2018 101-43127-421300 2,177.17 Check Sequence: 7 ACH Enabled: True 4,282.15 09/25/2018 609-49750-425100 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (09/19/2018 - 2:01 PM) Page 1 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number 65821400 freight 59.40 09/25/2018 609-49750-433300 65821800 freight 11.56 09/25/2018 609-49750-433300 65821800 resale - liquor 1,231.85 09/25/2018 609-49750-425100 65945600 freight 15.40 09/25/2018 609-49750-433300 65945600 resale - wine 128.00 09/25/2018 609-49750-425300 65945600 resale - liquor 643.50 09/25/2018 609-49750-425100 65952400 resale - liquor 74.00 09/25/2018 609-49750-425100 65952400 freight 2.20 09/25/2018 609-49750-433300 98240600 freight 0.45 09/25/2018 609-49750-433300 98240600 resale - condiments 69.00 09/25/2018 609-49750-425500 98240600 resale - mix 29.10 09/25/2018 609-49750-425400 98240800 asst. bags 270.90 09/25/2018 609-49754-421990 98240800 freight 1.24 09/25/2018 609-49750-433300 Check Total: 6,818.75 Vendor: 1067 BERNICK'S Check Sequence: 8 14750 resale - coffee 87.36 09/25/2018 226-45125-425410 55927 resale - return outdated pop -65.72 09/25/2018 226-45125-425410 55928 resale - pop, juice, milk 294.60 09/25/2018 226-45125-425410 55928 resale - pop for parties 56.00 09/25/2018 226-45123-421460 55929 resale - soda pop 65.67 09/25/2018 609-49750-425400 55929 resale - Juice 65.80 09/25/2018 609-49750-425500 55930 resale - beer 1,148.20 09/25/2018 609-49750-425200 59538 resale - soda pop 93.62 09/25/2018 609-49750-425400 59538 resale -juice 32.80 09/25/2018 609-49750-425500 59539 resale - beer 942.25 09/25/2018 609-49750-425200 Check Total: 2,720.58 Vendor: 4328 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN WINE & SPII Check Sequence: 9 1080855021 resale - liquor 2,155.47 09/25/2018 609-49750-425100 1080855021 resale - wine 242.00 09/25/2018 609-49750-425300 1080855021 resale - mix 144.00 09/25/2018 609-49750-425400 1080855021 freight 46.62 09/25/2018 609-49750-433300 1080855022 resale - beer 130.50 09/25/2018 609-49750-425200 1080858666 resale - liquor 3,774.49 09/25/2018 609-49750-425100 1080858666 resale - liquor 991.64 09/25/2018 609-49750-425300 1080858666 freight 74.81 09/25/2018 609-49750-433300 1080858667 resale - beer 261.00 09/25/2018 609-49750-425200 Check Total: 7,820.53 Reference ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (09/19/2018 - 2:01 PM) Page 2 Invoice No Description Vendor: 4100 KATHRYN BRISBOIS 8/18/2018 Mileage Reimbursement - Training (83.8 miles) 8/18/2018 Meal Reimbursement @ Training 00227370 Check Total: Vendor: 1091 CAMPBELL KNUTSON PA 2348-001 G 110 Code Enforcement - August 2018 2348-148G 13 16C006 - Fallon Ave Condemnation - August 20 2348-154G 2 201833 - Carlisle Village 6th Addition - August Check Total: Vendor: 4646 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES L.P. 2157283 resale - beer 2157283 resale - beer n/a 2160410 resale - beer 2160410 resale - beer n/a Amount Payment Date Check Total: Vendor: 1106 CENTRAL MCGOWAN INC 00227370 Bulk Carbon Dioxide (471 lbs) ACH Enabled: True Check Total: Vendor: 5081 JOANN CHAMBERLIN 9/6/2018 Refund - Canceled Couch to 5K Program 09/25/2018 Check Total: Vendor: 4315 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 9/1/2018 Digital Receiver Check Total: Vendor: 4888 CLEAR CREEK LAND COMPANY LLC 9/13/2018 True 16D001 - Clear Creek Addition Escrow Refund 09/25/2018 Check Total: Vendor: 4861 CORE & MAIN LP J463640 09/25/2018 6 MJ RW Gate vlv ol; valve box assmb. dome; el J490100 ball corp stop ; union apt ctsxcts; saddle;etc. Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Check Sequence: 10 ACH Enabled: True 45.67 09/25/2018 217-41990-433100 10.99 09/25/2018 217-41990-433100 56.66 Check Sequence: 11 ACH Enabled: True 126.00 09/25/2018 101-42400-430400 2,660.10 09/25/2018 400-43300-459018 188.00 09/25/2018 101-00000-220110 2,974.10 Check Sequence: 12 ACH Enabled: True 12,580.95 09/25/2018 609-49750-425200 84.00 09/25/2018 609-49750-425400 14,332.90 09/25/2018 609-49750-425200 35.90 09/25/2018 609-49750-425400 27,033.75 Check Sequence: 13 ACH Enabled: True 123.20 09/25/2018 226-45124-421600 123.20 Check Sequence: 14 ACH Enabled: False 40.00 09/25/2018 226-45127-347920 40.00 Check Sequence: 15 ACH Enabled: False 7.96 09/25/2018 101-41110-431990 7.96 Check Sequence: 16 ACH Enabled: False 12,378.93 09/25/2018 101-00000-220110 12,378.93 Check Sequence: 17 ACH Enabled: False 1,585.64 09/25/2018 601-49440-422220 505.42 09/25/2018 601-49440-422220 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (09/19/2018 - 2:01 PM) Page 3 Invoice No Description Check Total: AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (09/19/2018 - 2:01 PM) Amount Payment Date Acct Number 2,091.06 39.87 39.88 79.75 569.00 569.00 30.96 30.96 6,285.70 98.00 14,903.90 132.00 26.05 4,358.05 -112.00 25,270.52 257.70 -163.50 179.20 -224.00 51,011.62 123.30 123.30 121.60 121.60 Check Sequence: 18 09/25/2018 601-49440-420650 09/25/2018 602-49490-420650 Check Sequence: 19 09/25/2018 101-45201-431990 Check Sequence: 20 09/25/2018 101-42200-422110 Check Sequence: 21 09/25/2018 609-49750-425200 09/25/2018 226-45125-425410 09/25/2018 609-49750-425200 09/25/2018 609-49750-425400 09/25/2018 609-49750-425400 09/25/2018 609-49750-425200 09/25/2018 609-49750-425200 09/25/2018 609-49750-425200 09/25/2018 609-49750-425400 09/25/2018 609-49750-425200 09/25/2018 609-49750-425200 09/25/2018 609-49750-425200 Check Sequence: 22 09/25/2018 229-45202-453010 Check Sequence: 23 09/25/2018 213-46301-443990 Reference ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: False Page 4 Check Total: Vendor: 2197 CORPORATE CONNECTION 48901 (5) Lime T-shirt - 1/2 Water 48901 (5) Lime T-shirt - 1/2 Sewer Check Total: Vendor: 5076 COX PLUMBING, LLC 7230 Irrigation system downtown plants Check Total: Vendor: 1746 CUSTOM FIRE APPARATUS INC 18451 valve Check Total: Vendor: 1129 DAHLHEIMER BEVERAGE LLC 1369107 resale -beer 184154 resale - Beer @ Ballfields 186730 resale -beer 186730 resale -beer n/a 187192 resale -beer n/a 187192 resale -beer 187273 resale -beer 187530 resale -beer 187530 resale -beer n/a 187635 resale -beer 187780 resale -beer 187819 resale -beer credit Check Total: Vendor: 4475 DAKOTA SUPPLY GROUP E141400 ZPARKS-FSTONE- assorted adapters Check Total: Vendor: 2050 DEMVI LLC 9/19/2018 Oct - Parking Lot Easement Maint Agreement Check Total: AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (09/19/2018 - 2:01 PM) Amount Payment Date Acct Number 2,091.06 39.87 39.88 79.75 569.00 569.00 30.96 30.96 6,285.70 98.00 14,903.90 132.00 26.05 4,358.05 -112.00 25,270.52 257.70 -163.50 179.20 -224.00 51,011.62 123.30 123.30 121.60 121.60 Check Sequence: 18 09/25/2018 601-49440-420650 09/25/2018 602-49490-420650 Check Sequence: 19 09/25/2018 101-45201-431990 Check Sequence: 20 09/25/2018 101-42200-422110 Check Sequence: 21 09/25/2018 609-49750-425200 09/25/2018 226-45125-425410 09/25/2018 609-49750-425200 09/25/2018 609-49750-425400 09/25/2018 609-49750-425400 09/25/2018 609-49750-425200 09/25/2018 609-49750-425200 09/25/2018 609-49750-425200 09/25/2018 609-49750-425400 09/25/2018 609-49750-425200 09/25/2018 609-49750-425200 09/25/2018 609-49750-425200 Check Sequence: 22 09/25/2018 229-45202-453010 Check Sequence: 23 09/25/2018 213-46301-443990 Reference ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: False Page 4 Invoice No Description Vendor: 5083 RONALD F DROPIK 9/17/2018 Performances at Farmers Market 9/13/18 & 9/27 Check Sequence: 24 Check Total: Vendor: 4191 ELK RIVER GREENHOUSE LLC 9/17/2018 226-45127-431992 Farmers Market Token Collection Log - 9/6/13 6 Check Total: Vendor: 5033 ENTERTAINMENT PROTECTION GROUP, L 15052 Security Coverage - 9/1/18 Check Sequence: 25 Check Total: Vendor: 2004 TRACY ERGEN 8/27/2018 226-45127-431992 Mileage Reimbursement - OSHA Seminar (63.6 9/19/2018 Annual Employee Awards - Paid on Personal CC Check Total: Vendor: 5003 EUREKA CONSTRUCTION INC Pay Voucher #3 16C006 - Fallon Overpass - Pay Voucher #3 Enabled: False Check Total: Vendor: 4973 MICHELLE EWING 9/14/2018 TIF 1-22 Business ReEstablishment 9/14/2018 TIF 1-22 Moving Costs 9/18/2018 TIF 1-22 Business Reestablishment Check Sequence: 27 Check Total: Vendor: 5077 FAHRNER ASPHALT SEALERS, LLC 508558402-004 Pathway micro -surfacing project Check Total: Vendor: 2561 FERGUSON WATERWORKS #2516 0301513 meter Ecdr usg 1/tp; meter p/c usg x 0302826 2T10 meter ccdr usg Check Total: Vendor: 2273 FIBERNET MONTICELLO - ACH Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Check Sequence: 24 ACH Enabled: False 200.00 09/25/2018 226-45127-431992 200.00 Check Sequence: 25 ACH Enabled: True 261.00 09/25/2018 226-45127-431992 261.00 Check Sequence: 26 ACH Enabled: False 181.91 09/25/2018 226-45123-431992 181.91 Check Sequence: 27 ACH Enabled: True 34.66 09/25/2018 101-41800-433100 308.04 09/25/2018 101-41800-443990 342.70 Check Sequence: 28 ACH Enabled: True 1,518,864.80 09/25/2018 400-43300-459018 1,518,864.80 Check Sequence: 29 ACH Enabled: False 4,614.50 09/25/2018 213-46522-443990 3,825.07 09/25/2018 213-46522-443990 3,735.94 09/25/2018 213-46522-443990 12,175.51 Check Sequence: 30 ACH Enabled: False 45,027.50 09/25/2018 101-45201-440910 45,027.50 Check Sequence: 31 ACH Enabled: False 1,135.00 09/25/2018 601-49440-422701 732.35 09/25/2018 601-49440-422701 1,867.35 Check Sequence: 32 ACH Enabled: True AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (09/19/2018 - 2:01 PM) Page 5 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 9/8/2018 City Hall Phone - Sept 2018 617.82 09/25/2018 702-00000-432100 9/8/2018 MCC Phone -Sept 2018 539.88 09/25/2018 702-00000-432100 9/8/2018 Ballfields Phone - Sept 2018 19.46 09/25/2018 702-00000-432100 9/8/2018 DMV Phone - Sept 2018 265.84 09/25/2018 702-00000-432100 9/8/2018 Hi Way Liquor Phone - Sept 2018 341.82 09/25/2018 702-00000-432100 9/8/2018 Fire Hall Phone - Sept 2018 203.59 09/25/2018 702-00000-432100 9/8/2018 Public Works Phone - Sept 2018 264.64 09/25/2018 702-00000-432100 9/8/2018 Parks Phone - Sept 2018 113.82 09/25/2018 702-00000-432100 9/8/2018 Prairie Center Phone - Sept 2018 14.22 09/25/2018 702-00000-432100 9/8/2018 Sheriff Phone - Sept 2018 69.76 09/25/2018 702-00000-432100 9/8/2018 Friendship Island Phone - Sept 2018 -11.44 09/25/2018 702-00000-432100 9/8/2018 City Hall Internet - Sept 2018 134.95 09/25/2018 702-00000-432300 9/8/2018 MCC Internet - Sept 2018 10.00 09/25/2018 702-00000-432300 9/8/2018 Ballfields Internet - Sept 2018 10.00 09/25/2018 702-00000-432300 9/8/2018 DMV Internet - Sept 2018 41.95 09/25/2018 702-00000-432300 9/8/2018 Hi Way Liquors Internet - Sept 2018 41.95 09/25/2018 702-00000-432300 9/8/2018 Fire Hall Internet - Sept 2018 41.95 09/25/2018 702-00000-432300 9/8/2018 Animal Shelter Internet - Sept 2018 29.95 09/25/2018 702-00000-432300 9/8/2018 Public Works Internet - Sept 2018 69.95 09/25/2018 702-00000-432300 9/8/2018 Sheriff Internet - Sept 2018 41.95 09/25/2018 702-00000-432300 9/8/2018 Friendship Island Internet - Sept 2018 39.90 09/25/2018 702-00000-432300 9/8/2018 CityHall Cable - Sept 2018 12.95 09/25/2018 101-41310-431990 9/8/2018 MCC Cable - Sept 2018 329.81 09/25/2018 226-45127-432500 9/8/2018 Data Hosting -Sept 2018 500.00 09/25/2018 702-00000-431900 9/8/2018 Service Contract - Sept 2018 250.00 09/25/2018 702-00000-431900 Check Total: 3,994.72 Vendor: 3748 JEFFREY D GARDNER Check Sequence: 33 ACH Enabled: True 9/17/2018 Farmers Market Token Collection Log - 9/13/18 39.00 09/25/2018 226-45127-431992 Check Total: 39.00 Vendor: 3762 GARRETTS DIAMOND CITY BREAD Check Sequence: 34 ACH Enabled: True 9/17/2018 Farmers Market Token Collection Log - 9/13/18 26.00 09/25/2018 226-45127-431992 Check Total: 26.00 Vendor: 1413 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL INC Check Sequence: 35 ACH Enabled: True 8080584 Aug. 2018 (219) tickets - 1/2 FNM 147.83 09/25/2018 656-00000-202099 8080584 Aug. 2018 (219) tickets - 1/2 Water 147.82 09/25/2018 601-49440-432770 Check Total: 295.65 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (09/19/2018 - 2:01 PM) Page 6 Invoice No Description Vendor: 1205 GRAINGER INC 9896117257 Wall Mount Fans (2) 9901164393 Basketball Nets (6) 9906370615 Enabled: Shaft Collar Screw Set (2) 81.62 Check Total: Vendor: 5075 GRANITE WATER WORKS INC. 107822 52.86 (2) 12" Gate Valve; (2) 12x12 long sleeve; etc 09/25/2018 226-45126-422990 Check Total: Vendor: 1223 HAWKINS INC 4359903 09/25/2018 Pool Chemicals Check Total: Vendor: 4940 CAROL HAYNER 3099 (32) t -shirts; (4) fire hats embroidery Check Total: Vendor: 4650 JASEN HOGLUND 19418 False (19) mile marker decals 09/25/2018 Check Total: Vendor: 4218 HOHENSTEINS, INC 987371 resale - beer 987371 resale - beer n/a Check Total: Vendor: 5080 J & A GLASS & MIRROR INC 243671NV True Demo Bottom Caulking; Verify Weep System; R 09/25/2018 Check Total: Vendor: 1259 JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING 2866312 resale - beer 2866312 resale - beer n/a 2866312 freight Check Total: AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (09/19/2018 - 2:01 PM) Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Check Sequence: 36 ACH Enabled: False 81.62 09/25/2018 226-45126-422990 52.86 09/25/2018 226-45126-422990 15.82 09/25/2018 226-45127-421720 150.30 Check Sequence: 37 ACH Enabled: False 5,810.06 09/25/2018 601-49440-422220 5,810.06 Check Sequence: 38 ACH Enabled: True 1,150.12 09/25/2018 226-45124-421600 1,150.12 Check Sequence: 39 ACH Enabled: False 592.00 09/25/2018 101-42200-421120 592.00 Check Sequence: 40 ACH Enabled: False 55.00 09/25/2018 101-45201-421650 55.00 Check Sequence: 41 ACH Enabled: False 743.00 09/25/2018 609-49750-425200 60.00 09/25/2018 609-49750-425400 803.00 Check Sequence: 42 ACH Enabled: False 475.00 09/25/2018 226-45126-431990 475.00 Check Sequence: 43 ACH Enabled: False 2,229.15 09/25/2018 609-49750-425200 50.40 09/25/2018 609-49750-425400 3.00 09/25/2018 609-49750-433300 2,282.55 Page 7 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Vendor: 1263 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. Check Sequence: 44 ACH Enabled: False 1094524 resale - liquor 341.10 09/25/2018 609-49750-425100 1094524 freight 4.47 09/25/2018 609-49750-433300 1095280 freight 123.90 09/25/2018 609-49750-433300 1095280 resale - liquor 8,020.10 09/25/2018 609-49750-425100 1095281 resale - wine 1,120.78 09/25/2018 609-49750-425300 1095281 resale - mix 32.00 09/25/2018 609-49750-425400 1095281 freight 32.77 09/25/2018 609-49750-433300 1095282 resale - beer 216.57 09/25/2018 609-49750-425200 1096689 resale - liquor 3,744.14 09/25/2018 609-49750-425100 1096689 freight 63.69 09/25/2018 609-49750-433300 1096690 freight 50.66 09/25/2018 609-49750-433300 1096690 resale - wine 1,568.65 09/25/2018 609-49750-425300 1096690 resale - mix 134.00 09/25/2018 609-49750-425400 1099729 resale - liquor 2,965.55 09/25/2018 609-49750-425100 1099729 freight 37.99 09/25/2018 609-49750-433300 1100437 resale - wine 7,226.41 09/25/2018 609-49750-425300 1100437 freight 49.53 09/25/2018 609-49750-433300 1100438 freight 34.27 09/25/2018 609-49750-433300 1100438 resale - wine 1,022.85 09/25/2018 609-49750-425300 1100438 resale - mix 41.35 09/25/2018 609-49750-425400 1100439 resale - beer 22.99 09/25/2018 609-49750-425200 1101519 resale - liquor 1,749.46 09/25/2018 609-49750-425100 1101519 freight 23.84 09/25/2018 609-49750-433300 1101520 freight 6.45 09/25/2018 609-49750-433300 1101520 resale - wine 341.46 09/25/2018 609-49750-425300 1101521 resale - beer 60.00 09/25/2018 609-49750-425200 1104167 freight 24.82 09/25/2018 609-49750-433300 1104167 resale - liquor 2,110.23 09/25/2018 609-49750-425100 1104168 resale - wine 361.45 09/25/2018 609-49750-425300 1104168 freight 11.92 09/25/2018 609-49750-433300 1105052 freight 21.60 09/25/2018 609-49750-433300 1105052 resale - liquor 1,715.00 09/25/2018 609-49750-425100 1105053 resale - wine 1,143.30 09/25/2018 609-49750-425300 1105053 resale - wine n/a 70.00 09/25/2018 609-49750-425400 1105053 freight 37.25 09/25/2018 609-49750-433300 500502 resale - liquor credit inv. # 1095280 -133.00 09/25/2018 609-49750-425100 500502 freight credit inv. # 1095280 -1.49 09/25/2018 609-49750-433300 500714 freight credit inv. 4 1099729 -1.49 09/25/2018 609-49750-433300 500714 resale - liquor credit inv. # 1099729 -47.00 09/25/2018 609-49750-425100 699112 resale - liquor credit inv. # 1090702 -47.00 09/25/2018 609-49750-425100 699112 freight credit inv. # 1090702 -1.49 09/25/2018 609-49750-433300 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (09/19/2018 - 2:01 PM) Page 8 Invoice No Description 700131 Payment Date resale - liquor credit inv. # 1082462 700307 freight credit inv. # 1096689 700307 09/25/2018 resale - liquor credit inv. # 1096689 700310 resale - liquor credit inv. # 1095280 700310 09/25/2018 freight credit inv. # 1095280 Check Total: Vendor: 5078 KILLMER ELECTRIC COMPANY INC Pay Voucher 1 18C002 - 2018 Street Lighting Improvements - I 09/25/2018 Check Total: Vendor: 4484 LAKELAND TRANSMISSION 22973 09/25/2018 Squad 5- replace shift cable grommet @ trans.; a Check Total: Vendor: 3829 STEVE LANGANKI 1134 (24) Porta Toilet rentals 7/22-8/18/2018 Check Total: Vendor: 3852 LASER MEMORIES 1086 09/25/2018 Plaque Recognizing Donation of Mirrors @ Prai Check Total: Vendor: 3933 CHARLES LONG 9/17/2018 Farmers Market Token Collection Log - 9/6/18 6 Check Total: Vendor: 4456 LUPULIN BREWING LLC 15465 09/25/2018 resale - beer Check Total: Vendor: 1303 M AMUNDSON CIGAR & CANDY CO, LLP 265442 resale - cigarettes 265442 resale - tobacco; barware; soda pop; etc ACH Enabled: True Check Total: Vendor: 2819 MADDEN GALANTER HANSEN LLP Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference -30.27 09/25/2018 609-49750-425100 -1.49 09/25/2018 609-49750-433300 -47.00 09/25/2018 609-49750-425100 -239.00 09/25/2018 609-49750-425100 -1.49 09/25/2018 609-49750-433300 33,979.83 Check Sequence: 45 ACH Enabled: False 55,851.92 09/25/2018 245-43162-453010 55,851.92 Check Sequence: 46 ACH Enabled: False 101.59 09/25/2018 101-42200-440500 101.59 Check Sequence: 47 ACH Enabled: True 1,244.50 09/25/2018 101-45201-431901 1,244.50 Check Sequence: 48 ACH Enabled: False 32.00 09/25/2018 226-45127-421720 32.00 Check Sequence: 49 ACH Enabled: False 206.00 09/25/2018 226-45127-431992 206.00 Check Sequence: 50 ACH Enabled: True 108.00 09/25/2018 609-49750-425200 108.00 Check Sequence: 51 ACH Enabled: True 1,589.92 09/25/2018 609-49750-425500 673.37 09/25/2018 609-49750-425400 2,263.29 Check Sequence: 52 ACH Enabled: False AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (09/19/2018 - 2:01 PM) Page 9 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference August 2018 Labor Relations Services - August 2018 120.00 09/25/2018 101-41800-430400 Check Total: 120.00 Vendor: 3745 MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY Check Sequence: 53 ACH Enabled: True 20956052 (615) gal diesel @ $2.82 1,737.08 09/25/2018 101-43120-421200 20956055 (590) gal unleaded @ $2.49 1,467.12 09/25/2018 101-43120-421200 Check Total: 3,204.20 Vendor: 1726 MARCO TECHNOLOGIES Check Sequence: 54 ACH Enabled: False INV5407216 7/10/17 - 7/9/18 - Contract Overages 325.78 09/25/2018 702-00000-441500 INV5411505 Supply Freight Fee 46.00 09/25/2018 702-00000-441500 INV5411505 7/10/18 - 8/9/18 Contract Payment 935.58 09/25/2018 702-00000-441500 INV5411506 Contract Payment 7/10/18 - 8/9/18 214.29 09/25/2018 702-00000-441500 INV5557671 9/10/18 - 10/9/18 Contract Payment 935.58 09/25/2018 702-00000-441500 INV5557671 Supply Freight Fee 46.00 09/25/2018 702-00000-441500 INV5557672 9/10/18 - 10/9/18 Contract Payment 214.29 09/25/2018 702-00000-441500 Check Total: 2,717.52 Vendor: 1314 MCDOWALL COMPANY Check Sequence: 55 ACH Enabled: False 609445 Replace Actuator in Innovent Pool Unit 720.08 09/25/2018 226-45126-431990 610787 Maint. Agreement Contract C0560 9/1-18 to 8/3 3,156.83 09/25/2018 609-49754-431990 610881 Quarterly Maintenance Contact #C0520 - MCC - 466.00 09/25/2018 226-45126-431990 Check Total: 4,342.91 Vendor: 2852 MIDWEST BUSINESS PROMOTIONS INC Check Sequence: 56 ACH Enabled: True 12903 (525) Press N Stick Calendars 369.43 09/25/2018 609-49754-434990 Check Total: 369.43 Vendor: 4317 MINNESOTA ASSOCIATION OF CEMETERII Check Sequence: 57 ACH Enabled: False 2018 Fee MN Cemeteries Assoc. Fee 2018- Riverside 60.00 09/25/2018 651-49010-421990 Check Total: 60.00 Vendor: 1370 MONTICELLO DEPUTY REG #002 Check Sequence: 58 ACH Enabled: False 9/12/2018 Vehicle Registration Renewal - Equinox 16.00 09/25/2018 101-42400-443990 Check Total: 16.00 Vendor: 1377 MONTICELLO SENIOR CENTER Check Sequence: 59 ACH Enabled: True Sept 2018 Monthly Allocation - Sept 2018 5,013.33 09/25/2018 101-45175-444310 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (09/19/2018 - 2:01 PM) Page 10 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number 5,013.33 42.73 42.73 182.75 182.75 6,059.36 95.00 6,154.36 3,194.52 181.50 1,672.74 495.00 1,419.00 150.00 7,112.76 280,291.12 280,291.12 246.46 163.76 246.46 656.68 2,036.20 28.75 Check Sequence: 60 09/25/2018 226-45122-433100 Check Sequence: 61 09/25/2018 101-45201-422100 Check Sequence: 62 09/25/2018 101-43120-422110 09/25/2018 101-43120-422110 Check Sequence: 63 09/25/2018 101-41910-431990 09/25/2018 101-00000-220110 09/25/2018 101-00000-220110 09/25/2018 101-00000-220110 09/25/2018 101-00000-220110 09/25/2018 101-41910-431990 Check Sequence: 64 09/25/2018 101-00000-220110 Check Sequence: 65 09/25/2018 101-43120-422400 09/25/2018 101-43120-422400 09/25/2018 101-43120-422400 Check Sequence: 66 09/25/2018 609-49750-425300 09/25/2018 609-49750-433300 Reference ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (09/19/2018 - 2:01 PM) Page 11 Check Total: Check Total: Vendor: 4549 ANN MOSACK 9/10/2018 (2) AC Fines mix Mileage Reimbursement - July - August (78.4 m (3.01) AC Fines mix Check Total: Vendor: 1390 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 1187277 23033 #222; 226; 228 - (2) Belt -v; (6) blade rotatary Check Total: Vendor: 4616 NORTHSTAR MACHINING LLC 101876 2007 Dump - Mod. Catalyst; Mod. outlet, etc 101878 Sweeper- check and clear trouble codes Check Total: Vendor: 1401 NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANT 23799 Aug 2018 - Technical Assistance - City Projects 23800 201808 - Briggs Properties Final Stage PUD - A 23800 201833 - Carlisle Village PUD- August 2018 23800 201835 - Carlisle Village PUD Adjustment Augu 23800 201836 - Arvola CCD Office CUP - August 201 23801 Aug 2018 - Technical Assistance - Meetings Check Total: Vendor: 4472 NOVAK FLECK INC 9/13/2018 17D003 - Escrow Refund/Featherstone 3rd Addi Amount Payment Date Acct Number 5,013.33 42.73 42.73 182.75 182.75 6,059.36 95.00 6,154.36 3,194.52 181.50 1,672.74 495.00 1,419.00 150.00 7,112.76 280,291.12 280,291.12 246.46 163.76 246.46 656.68 2,036.20 28.75 Check Sequence: 60 09/25/2018 226-45122-433100 Check Sequence: 61 09/25/2018 101-45201-422100 Check Sequence: 62 09/25/2018 101-43120-422110 09/25/2018 101-43120-422110 Check Sequence: 63 09/25/2018 101-41910-431990 09/25/2018 101-00000-220110 09/25/2018 101-00000-220110 09/25/2018 101-00000-220110 09/25/2018 101-00000-220110 09/25/2018 101-41910-431990 Check Sequence: 64 09/25/2018 101-00000-220110 Check Sequence: 65 09/25/2018 101-43120-422400 09/25/2018 101-43120-422400 09/25/2018 101-43120-422400 Check Sequence: 66 09/25/2018 609-49750-425300 09/25/2018 609-49750-433300 Reference ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (09/19/2018 - 2:01 PM) Page 11 Check Total: Vendor: 1412 OMANN BROTHERS INC 13436 (3.01) AC Fines mix 13445 (2) AC Fines mix 13451 (3.01) AC Fines mix Check Total: Vendor: 1273 PAUSTIS & SONS WINE CO 23033 resale - wine 23033 freight Amount Payment Date Acct Number 5,013.33 42.73 42.73 182.75 182.75 6,059.36 95.00 6,154.36 3,194.52 181.50 1,672.74 495.00 1,419.00 150.00 7,112.76 280,291.12 280,291.12 246.46 163.76 246.46 656.68 2,036.20 28.75 Check Sequence: 60 09/25/2018 226-45122-433100 Check Sequence: 61 09/25/2018 101-45201-422100 Check Sequence: 62 09/25/2018 101-43120-422110 09/25/2018 101-43120-422110 Check Sequence: 63 09/25/2018 101-41910-431990 09/25/2018 101-00000-220110 09/25/2018 101-00000-220110 09/25/2018 101-00000-220110 09/25/2018 101-00000-220110 09/25/2018 101-41910-431990 Check Sequence: 64 09/25/2018 101-00000-220110 Check Sequence: 65 09/25/2018 101-43120-422400 09/25/2018 101-43120-422400 09/25/2018 101-43120-422400 Check Sequence: 66 09/25/2018 609-49750-425300 09/25/2018 609-49750-433300 Reference ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (09/19/2018 - 2:01 PM) Page 11 Invoice No Description Check Total: Vendor: 5084 NICOLE PETERSON 9/17/2018 Fitness Area Diffuser 9/17/2018 Staff Prizes Amount Payment Date Acct Number 2,064.95 Check Sequence: 67 29.99 09/25/2018 226-45127-421720 23.99 09/25/2018 226-45127-443990 53.98 Check Total: Vendor: 1427 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS CO 2416577 resale - wine 2416577 resale - mix 2416577 freight 2417604 freight 2417604 resale - liquor 2419463 resale - wine 2419463 freight 2419819 resale - liquor 2419819 freight 2420329 resale - liquor 2420329 freight 2421128 freight 2421128 resale - liquor 2421129 resale - wine 2421129 freight 2423098 freight 2423098 resale - liquor 2423099 resale - wine 2423099 freight 2423663 freight 2423663 resale - liquor 2423664 resale - mix 2423664 freight 306004 freight credit inv. 92417604 306004 resale - wine credit inv. #2417604 306005 resale - wine credit inv. # 2379572 306217 resale - liquor credit inv. # 2413624 306217 freight credit inv. # 2413624 306644 freight credit inv. # 2420329 306644 resale - liquor credit inv. # 2420329 34.27 Check Total: Amount Payment Date Acct Number 2,064.95 Check Sequence: 67 29.99 09/25/2018 226-45127-421720 23.99 09/25/2018 226-45127-443990 53.98 Check Sequence: 68 884.86 09/25/2018 609-49750-425300 72.00 09/25/2018 609-49750-425400 31.28 09/25/2018 609-49750-433300 67.42 09/25/2018 609-49750-433300 5,934.16 09/25/2018 609-49750-425100 984.75 09/25/2018 609-49750-425300 37.25 09/25/2018 609-49750-433300 2,955.14 09/25/2018 609-49750-425100 30.22 09/25/2018 609-49750-433300 515.90 09/25/2018 609-49750-425100 10.43 09/25/2018 609-49750-433300 55.00 09/25/2018 609-49750-433300 3,260.91 09/25/2018 609-49750-425100 1,103.00 09/25/2018 609-49750-425300 34.27 09/25/2018 609-49750-433300 16.39 09/25/2018 609-49750-433300 1,165.20 09/25/2018 609-49750-425100 52.00 09/25/2018 609-49750-425300 2.98 09/25/2018 609-49750-433300 15.39 09/25/2018 609-49750-433300 1,789.33 09/25/2018 609-49750-425100 320.00 09/25/2018 609-49750-425400 7.45 09/25/2018 609-49750-433300 -1.49 09/25/2018 609-49750-433300 -89.29 09/25/2018 609-49750-425300 -4.00 09/25/2018 609-49750-425300 -96.95 09/25/2018 609-49750-425100 -1.49 09/25/2018 609-49750-433300 -2.98 09/25/2018 609-49750-433300 -335.90 09/25/2018 609-49750-425100 18,813.23 Reference ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (09/19/2018 - 2:01 PM) Page 12 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Vendor: 4564 POLE PAINTING PLUS, INC Check Sequence: 69 ACH Enabled: False 1540 streetlight painting cc apprvd. 8/13/18 21,400.00 09/25/2018 101-43160-440990 Check Total: 21,400.00 Vendor: 4565 R HOMES Check Sequence: 70 ACH Enabled: False 9/6/2018 Escrow Refund - 9091 Golden Pond/Sunset Pon( 2,000.00 09/25/2018 101-00000-220110 9/6/2018 Escrow Refund - 9079 Golden Pond/Sunset Pon( 2,000.00 09/25/2018 101-00000-220110 Check Total: 4,000.00 Vendor: 1455 RED'S MARATHON Check Sequence: 71 ACH Enabled: False Aug. 2018 Parks small engine gas 20.83 09/25/2018 101-45201-421200 Aug. 2018 PW battery 135.00 09/25/2018 101-43127-422100 Sweeper labor - Sweeper- a/c install; recharge syst. 250.00 09/25/2018 101-43120-422100 Sweeper parts- Sweeper- a/c install; recharge syst. 483.50 09/25/2018 101-43120-422100 Check Total: 889.33 Vendor: 4022 REINHART FOODSERVICE LLC Check Sequence: 72 ACH Enabled: True 443989 Food for Concession Resale 392.11 09/25/2018 226-45125-425410 Check Total: 392.11 Vendor: 4575 REPLENISHMENT SOLUTIONS LLC Check Sequence: 73 ACH Enabled: True 2156046 resale - beer 318.00 09/25/2018 609-49750-425200 Check Total: 318.00 Vendor: 4781 RUE 38 LLC Check Sequence: 74 ACH Enabled: False 3903 resale - wine 580.00 09/25/2018 609-49750-425300 3903 freight 9.00 09/25/2018 609-49750-433300 Check Total: 589.00 Vendor: 1470 RUSSELL SECURITY RESOURCE INC Check Sequence: 75 ACH Enabled: True A32340 Mississippi Room Door - Repair Lever Spring 120.00 09/25/2018 226-45126-431990 A32997 Keys for City Hall 35.00 09/25/2018 101-41310-421990 Check Total: 155.00 Vendor: 5079 S W WOLD Check Sequence: 76 ACH Enabled: False 9/18/2018 Escrow Refund - 9216 Orchard Cir/Autumn Ridgy 2,000.00 09/25/2018 101-00000-220110 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (09/19/2018 - 2:01 PM) Page 13 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Check Total: 2,000.00 Vendor: 1474 PATRICIAA SALZWEDEL Check Sequence: 77 ACH Enabled: True Sept 2nd Semi Monthly Contract Payment 1,593.75 09/25/2018 101-42700-431200 Check Total: 1,593.75 Vendor: 4981 STEVE SCHILLEWAERT Check Sequence: 78 ACH Enabled: False 81828 Riverside - 8/28 mowed 850.00 09/25/2018 651-49010-431050 81829 Hillside- Aug. (2) mow; litter/debris; (2) right of 775.00 09/25/2018 101-45201-431050 81832 Cut, Trim & Maint. grass/weeds@ FNM Head E 125.00 09/25/2018 656-00000-202099 Check Total: 1,750.00 Vendor: 3751 CHRISTINE SCHYMA Check Sequence: 79 ACH Enabled: False 9/17/2018 Farmers Market Token Collection Log - 9/6/18 33.00 09/25/2018 226-45127-431992 Check Total: 33.00 Vendor: 4990 PATRICIA J SCOTT Check Sequence: 80 ACH Enabled: True 9/17/2018 Farmers Market Token Collection Log - 9/6/18 b 27.00 09/25/2018 226-45127-431992 Check Total: 27.00 Vendor: 2443 SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA INC Check Sequence: 81 ACH Enabled: False W6147328 7/21/18 - Event Security 140.00 09/25/2018 226-45123-431992 Check Total: 140.00 Vendor: 2326 SEIDENKRANZ WELDING SERVICE LLC Check Sequence: 82 ACH Enabled: False 4260 Repair Exercise Bike & Weigh Training Equipm 165.00 09/25/2018 226-45126-422990 Check Total: 165.00 Vendor: 4474 SITE ONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY Check Sequence: 83 ACH Enabled: False 88025550 16C006-CONSTR - Fallon Overpass 2,275.36 09/25/2018 400-43300-459018 Check Total: 2,275.36 Vendor: 5067 SOLAR TRAFFIC SYSTEMS Check Sequence: 84 ACH Enabled: False 18-4928 (2) break -a -way pole coupling 196.60 09/25/2018 101-43120-422600 Check Total: 196.60 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (09/19/2018 - 2:01 PM) Page 14 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Vendor: 3309 SOUTHERN GLAZER'S WINE AND SPIRITS, Check Sequence: 85 ACH Enabled: False 1726184 resale - liquor 1,667.63 09/25/2018 609-49750-425100 1726184 freight 15.40 09/25/2018 609-49750-433300 1726185 freight 1.40 09/25/2018 609-49750-433300 1726185 resale - mix 40.12 09/25/2018 609-49750-425400 1726186 resale - wine 1,078.00 09/25/2018 609-49750-425300 1726186 freight 18.43 09/25/2018 609-49750-433300 1728772 resale - liquor 2,583.44 09/25/2018 609-49750-425100 1728772 freight 30.95 09/25/2018 609-49750-433300 1728773 resale - wine 1,134.80 09/25/2018 609-49750-425300 1728773 freight 13.53 09/25/2018 609-49750-433300 42858 pickup resale - wine credit -122.00 09/25/2018 609-49750-425300 Check Total: 6,461.70 Vendor: 4874 SPLASH SCHOOL LLC Check Sequence: 86 ACH Enabled: False 4062 Life Guard Refresher Training (2) 250.00 09/25/2018 226-45124-431990 Check Total: 250.00 Vendor: 2564 SPORTS PRO LLC Check Sequence: 87 ACH Enabled: True 600 Labor - WO#339 - Stairmaster Lat Pulldown 40.00 09/25/2018 226-45126-422990 600 Parts - WO#339 - Cable for Stairmaster Lat Pulb 195.00 09/25/2018 226-45126-422990 Check Total: 235.00 Vendor: 4513 AARON STAEHNKE Check Sequence: 88 ACH Enabled: True 9/17/2018 Farmers Market Token Collection Log - 9/6/18 18.00 09/25/2018 226-45127-431992 Check Total: 18.00 Vendor: 1518 TDS TELECOM Check Sequence: 89 ACH Enabled: True 763-271-3257 TDS 99.29 09/25/2018 702-00000-432100 763-295-2005 TDS 20.14 09/25/2018 702-00000-432100 763-295-3714 TDS 345.37 09/25/2018 702-00000-432100 Check Total: 464.80 Vendor: 1059 TILLER CORPORATION Check Sequence: 90 ACH Enabled: False 180831 (52.09) T. Class 5 recycle 591.22 09/25/2018 101-43120-422400 Check Total: 591.22 Vendor: 4859 TRIO SUPPLY COMPANY Check Sequence: 91 ACH Enabled: False AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (09/19/2018 - 2:01 PM) Page 15 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 477639 (2)cs. Top Flite Cleaner; )2) cs t. tissue; (3) can I 270.34 09/25/2018 101-45201-421650 480875 return cs. 32 oz disinfec/degrease inv. # 463784 -55.91 09/25/2018 101-45201-421650 Check Total: 214.43 Vendor: 4656 TRUE FABRICATIONS, INC. Check Sequence: 92 ACH Enabled: False 381182 resale - (4) bottle holder 69.96 09/25/2018 609-49750-425400 381182 freight 10.49 09/25/2018 609-49750-433300 385251 resale - (4) bottle holder 39.96 09/25/2018 609-49750-425400 385251 freight 5.99 09/25/2018 609-49750-433300 386183 resale - flasks; juice jugs; bottle openers; koozie; 559.98 09/25/2018 609-49750-425400 Check Total: 686.38 Vendor: 1544 US POSTAL SERVICE Check Sequence: 93 ACH Enabled: False 9/10/2018 PI 42 - UB Sept Billing (3,773 pcs) (1/2) 864.02 09/25/2018 601-49440-432200 9/10/2018 PI 42 - UB Sept Billing (3,773 pcs) (1/2) 864.01 09/25/2018 602-49490-432200 Check Total: 1,728.03 Vendor: 4774 SALLY VANBROCKLIN Check Sequence: 94 ACH Enabled: False 9/17/2018 10/4/18 Performance at Farmers Market - Music 125.00 09/25/2018 101-45204-431990 Check Total: 125.00 Vendor: 1552 VIKING COCA COLA BOTTLING CO Check Sequence: 95 ACH Enabled: True 2217200 resale - soda pop 447.20 09/25/2018 609-49750-425400 2217310 resale - soda pop 345.85 09/25/2018 609-49750-425400 787187 resale - beer credit -14.00 09/25/2018 609-49750-425200 Check Total: 779.05 Vendor: 1684 VINOCOPIA Check Sequence: 96 ACH Enabled: True 0214678 resale - liquor 448.00 09/25/2018 609-49750-425100 0214678 freight 12.00 09/25/2018 609-49750-433300 0214678 resale - wine 48.00 09/25/2018 609-49750-425300 0215209 resale - liquor 406.05 09/25/2018 609-49750-425100 0215209 freight 7.50 09/25/2018 609-49750-433300 Check Total: 921.55 Vendor: 1561 WATER LABORATORIES INC Check Sequence: 97 ACH Enabled: False 7013 August 2018 Water Testing 288.00 09/25/2018 601-49440-422740 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (09/19/2018 - 2:01 PM) Page 16 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 288.00 Check Total: Vendor: 1567 WES OLSON ELECTRIC LLC 8805 Labor - Repair/Replace Timer on Adult Spa 8805 Repair/Replace Timer on Adult Spa (2 Timers) Check Total: Vendor: 4766 SUSAN WESTLEY Aug 2018 Sue Seeger - Creative Arts Srvc. Aug. 2018 Reimb. 8/30/18 Sue Seeger -organizer for Arts 09/25/2018 Check Total: Vendor: 2041 WESTSIDE WHOLESALE TIRE & SUPPLY R 820291 labor- (2) Hankook Tires - PW 820291 parts - (2) Hankook Tires - PW 226-45124-431990 Check Total: Vendor: 1572 THE WINE COMPANY 82476 resale - wine 82476 freight Check Total: Vendor: 1577 WRIGHT CO AUDITOR-TREAS - ACH 9/12/2018 Court Fines & Fees - August 2018 September September Deputies Contract Enabled: Check Total: Vendor: 1581 WRIGHT CO RECORDER 201800000075 201810 - CMMHC - Easement A# 1376953 201800000075 201836 - Arvola CUP A# 1378365 201800000075 201832 - HI Way Liquor CUP A# 1378366 201800000075 201828 - SAC Wireless CUP A# 1378367 201800000075 201831 -Oakwood Dental CUP A# 1378368 201800000075 201816 - Nextera CUP A# 1378369 201800000075 201715 - Monti Big Lake Hosp Amendment A# Check Total: Vendor: 1584 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 288.00 Check Sequence: 98 ACH Enabled: False 160.00 09/25/2018 226-45124-431990 170.24 09/25/2018 226-45124-431990 330.24 Check Sequence: 99 ACH Enabled: False 2,500.00 09/25/2018 101-45204-431990 10.00 09/25/2018 101-45204-421990 2,510.00 Check Sequence: 100 ACH Enabled: False 70.00 09/25/2018 101-43120-422200 951.52 09/25/2018 101-43120-422200 1,021.52 Check Sequence: 101 ACH Enabled: True 414.00 09/25/2018 609-49750-425300 8.25 09/25/2018 609-49750-433300 422.25 Check Sequence: 102 ACH Enabled: True 3,613.78 09/25/2018 101-42100-430410 105,120.00 09/25/2018 101-42100-430500 108,733.78 Check Sequence: 103 ACH Enabled: False 46.00 09/25/2018 101-41910-431990 46.00 09/25/2018 101-41910-431990 46.00 09/25/2018 101-41910-431990 46.00 09/25/2018 101-41910-431990 46.00 09/25/2018 101-41910-431990 46.00 09/25/2018 101-41910-431990 46.00 09/25/2018 101-41910-431990 322.00 Check Sequence: 104 ACH Enabled: True AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (09/19/2018 - 2:01 PM) Page 17 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number R011744-000 4 16C001 - BCOL Phase 1 Design - July 2018 39,434.00 09/25/2018 229-45202-453011 Check Total: 39,434.00 Vendor: 1679 ZEP SALES AND SERVICE Check Sequence: 105 9003667233 doz. Brake wash 79.47 09/25/2018 101-43127-421600 Check Total: 79.47 Total for Check Run: Total of Number of Checks: 2,338,643.07 105 Reference ACH Enabled: False The preceding list of bills payable was reviewed and approved for payment. Date: 9/24/18 Approved by Mayor Brian Stumpf AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (09/19/2018 - 2:01 PM) Page 18 City Council Agenda 9/24/2018 2B. Consideration of approving new hires and departures for Citv departments (TE) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The Council is asked to ratify the hiring and departures of employees that have occurred recently in the departments listed. It is recommended that the Council officially ratify the hiring/departure of all listed employees including part-time and seasonal workers. By ratifying departures, the council also approves the expenditure for final amounts due to terminated and otherwise departing employees. Al. Budget Impact: (positions are generally included in budget) A2. Staff Work Load Impact: If new positions, there may be some training involved. If terminated positions, existing staff would pick up those hours, as needed, until replaced. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: I . Motion to ratify the hire/departures of the employees as identified on the attached list. 2. Motion to deny the recommended hires and departures. C. RECOMMENDATION: By statute the City Council has the authority to approve all hires/departures. City staff recommends Alternative #l, for the Council to approve the hires and/or departures as listed. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • List of new/terminated employees NEW EMPLOYEES Name Title Department Hire Date Class Kiah Lindsey Childcare MCC 9/27/2018 PT Daniel Klein Emergency Services Coord.-Fire Marshal Fire 10/1/2018 FT TERMINATING EMPLOYEES Name Reason Department Last Day Class Ellie Engstrom Voluntary MCC 8/17/18 PT Krystal Doran Voluntary MCC 8/21/18 PT Amanda Prodoehl Voluntary MCC 8/31/18 Seasonal Eric Green Voluntary Liquor Store 9/5/18 PT New Hire and Terms City Council 2018.xlsx: 9/19/2018 City Council Agenda 9/24/2018 2C. Consideration of avnroving the sale or disposal of surplus Citv property (WO) There is no report this City Council cycle. Council Agenda: 09/24/2018 2D. Consideration of authorizing an amendment to Rustech Brewerv's liquor license to allow for a temporary outdoor patio (JS) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Rustech Brewery would like to amend their brewery liquor license to include a temporary outdoor patio for alcohol service. The attached drawing demonstrates where the temporary patio will be located. Plastic poles and chains will be used as the materials for the patio. Rustech Brewery plans to install a permanent patio in the spring. Per Minnesota Statute 340A.410, Subd. 7 an alcoholic beverage license is only effective for the licensed premises specified in the approved license application, which right now includes inside the building of 105 West 3rd Street. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Approve the request for amendment to Rustech Brewery's liquor license. 2. Do not approve the liquor license amendment request. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative 1. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Site drawing B. Amended Certificate of Liability � k1 m1 q RUSTE-1 OP ID: MS ACORO CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE DATE(MM/DD/YYYY) I 09/18/2018 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s),, PRODUCER 763-295-2614 NAME?cT Meghan harpe Foster White Agency, Inc. PHONE 763-295-2614 FAX 763-295-3010 114 West 3rd Street (A/C, No, Ext): (A/C, No): Monticello, MN 55362 EMAIL msharpe@foster-white.com Meghan Sharpe ADDRESS: INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC # INSURER A: Selective Insurance Co.ofAm 12572 INSURED Rustech Brewing Company, INSURER B: SFM Mutual Insurance Company 11347 LLC. 105 W 3rd Street INSURER C: Monticello, MN 55362 INSURER D: INSURER E: INSURER F: COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: REVISION NUMBER: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH DOLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY RAID CLAIMS. INSR ADDL SUBR POLICY EFF POLICY EXP TYPE OF INSURANCE iVn WyD POLICY NUMBER IMMIDD/YYYYI IMM/DDIYYYYI LIMITS H X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY C 111—m-11.1,000,000 CLAIMS -MADE OCCUR S2281729 GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: POLICY � PRO ❑ LOC JECT OTHER: AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY ANY AUTO OWNED SCHEDULED AUTOS ONLY AUTOS HIRED NON -OWNED AUTOS ONLY AUTOS ONLY UMBRELLA LIAB OCCUR EXCESS LIAB HCLAIMS-MADE DED I I RETENTION $ B WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY Y / N ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? AlY N I A (Mandatory in NH) A [IIf yes, describe 7 cuc11��1nFFder SCRIPuor 8DIIItyPERATIONS below EA H 08/29/2018 07/01/2019 DAMAGE TO RENTED PREMISES (Ea occurrence) $ 300,000 $ MED EXP (Any one person) $ 5,000 PERSONAL & ADV INJURY $ 1,000,000 GENERAL AGGREGATE $ 2,000,000 PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG $ 2,000,000 COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT (Ea accident) $ BODILY INJURY (Per person) $ BODILY INJURY (Per accident) $ PROPERTY DAMAGE (Per accident) $ I EACH OCCURRENCE $ (AGGREGATE $ X STATUTE EERH 92406.201 12/01/2017 12/01/2018 E.L. EACH ACCIDENT $ 100,000 E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE $ 100,000 E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT $ 500,000 S2281729 07/01/2018 06/30/2019 Liquor 1,000,000 Liability 2,000,000 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS / VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached if more space is required) Location Address: 105 W 3rd Street, Monticello, MN 55362 Liquor Liability coverage provided for operations at 105 W 3rd Street, Monticello, MN 55362 including the outdoor patio. CERTIFICATE HOLDER CITYMON City of Monticello 505 Walnut St. Ste 1 Monticello, MN 55362 CANCELLATION SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE Meghan Sharpe ACORD 25 (2016/03) @ 1988-2015 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD City Council Agenda: 9/24/2018 2E. Consideration of establishing a date for the Truth -In -Taxation Public Hearing (WO) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Cities with a population over 500 are required by state statute to hold a public hearing at which the budget and levy is discussed. The meeting must be held after November 24th and December 28th and held after 6:00 p.m. The public must be allowed to speak at the public hearing. Based on these requirements, it is staff's recommendation to hold the public hearing at the regular City Council meeting on December 10, 2018. After the public hearing, the City Council would then need to adopt the final 2019 property tax levy and 2019 budget. Other options include the regular meeting on November 26th (Monday following Thanksgiving), or a special meeting on December 3rd (Monday), or any other date between November 25th and December 28th Council must set TNT meeting prior to October 1St. If not, the county auditor will set a date within the same range of days allowed by law for cities. If the city fails to certify a preliminary levy by September 30, the county auditor will use the prior years final levy for property tax notices. The county -auditor shall mail notices to be delivered between November l0a' and November 24th. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to call for the public hearing for the 2019 property tax levy and budget on December 10, 2018 at 6:30 p.m. 2. Motion to call for the public hearing for the 2019 property tax levy and budget on any other date between November 25th and December 28th after 6 p.m. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends alternative #1 to call for the public hearing for the 2019 property tax levy and budget on December 10, 2018 at 6:30 p.m. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • None. City Council Agenda: 9/24/2018 2F. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2018-80 awarding the sale General Obligation Tax Abatement Bonds, Series 2018A, in the original aggregate principal amount of $5,000,000, fixing their form and specifications, directing their execution and delivery; and providing for their pavment (WO) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: On August 13, 2018, the council authorized the issuance tax abatement bonds. The council also authorized the mayor and city administrator to approve the sale of up to $5,000,000 in bonds with a true interest cost not to exceed 3.9% (Resolution 2018-069). Northland marketed the bonds on Wednesday morning (September 19) and the mayor and city administrator signed the purchase agreement in the afternoon of the same day. The true interest cost for this negotiated sale is 3.18% (10 -year treasury rate 3.08%). The true interest rate for the 2017 sales was 2.40% (10 -year treasury rate 2.27%). The true interest rate for the 2016 sale was 2.06% (10 -year treasury rate 1.74%). The true interest cost for the 2015 negotiated sale was 2.58% (10 -year treasury rate 2.06%). The true interest cost for the December 2014 Judgment -Equipment issue was 3.27% (10 -year treasury rate 2.24%). The treasury rate is provided for comparison purposes. Al. Budget Impact: Annual debt service payments over the next 14 years are about $450,000. A2. Staff Workload Impact: Internal coordination of issuance - otherwise little to no impact on the staff. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS 1. Motion to adopt Resolution 2018-80 approving the sale of $5,000,000 G.O. Tax Abatement Bonds, Series 2018A. 2. Motion to deny Resolution 2018-80 approving the sale of $5,000,000 G.O. Tax Abatement Bonds, Series 2018A. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The City staff supports Alternative #1. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Resolution 2018-80 B. Northland Securities Schedules: Total Sources and Uses, Debt Service Schedule, Pricing Summary C. Moody's Rating Comments CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO.2018-80 A RESOLUTION AWARDING THE SALE OF GENERAL OBLIGATION TAX ABATEMENT BONDS, SERIES 2018A, IN THE ORIGINAL AGGREGATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF $5,000,000; FIXING THEIR FORM AND SPECIFICATIONS; DIRECTING THEIR EXECUTION AND DELIVERY; AND PROVIDING FOR THEIR PAYMENT. follows: BE IT RESOLVED By the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota (the "City"), as Section 1. Sale of Bonds. 1.01. Abatement Bonds. (a) The City has determined to undertake infrastructure improvements primarily consisting of the construction of the Fallon Overpass in the City (the "Abatement Project"). (b) Under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475, as amended, and Sections 469.1812 through 469.1815, as amended (collectively, the "Abatement Act"), the City is authorized to grant a property tax abatement on specified parcels in order to accomplish certain public purposes, including the provision or construction of public infrastructure. (c) Pursuant to a resolution adopted by the City Council of the City on June 26, 2017 (the "Abatement Resolution") following a duly noticed public hearing, the City Council approved a property tax abatement (the "Abatements") for certain property in the City (the "Abatement Parcels") over a period of fifteen (15) years, in an amount sufficient to pay the principal amount of one or more series of bonds issued to finance the Abatement Project in an approximate principal amount of $9,000,000. (d) In the Abatement Resolution, the City found and determined that the Abatement Project benefits the Abatement Parcels, and that the maximum principal amount of bonds to be secured by Abatements does not exceed the estimated sum of Abatements from the Abatement Parcels for the term authorized under the Abatement Resolution. (e) It is necessary and expedient to the sound financial management of the affairs of the City to issue General Obligation Tax Abatement Bonds in the aggregate principal amount of $5,000,000 (the "Bonds"), pursuant to the Abatement Act, to provide financing for a portion of the Abatement Project. (f) The City desires to proceed with the sale of the Bonds by direct negotiation with Northland Securities, Inc. (the "Purchaser"). The Purchaser will purchase the Bonds in an arm's-length commercial transaction with the City. The City hereby ratifies and approves the selection of Blue Rose Capital Advisors, LLC in Minneapolis, Minnesota ("Blue Rose") to act as an independent financial advisor for the purpose of reviewing the pricing fairness associated with the purchase and subsequent reoffering of the Bonds. The actions of the City Finance Director in executing an agreement with Blue Rose for an amount not to exceed $2,000 are hereby ratified and approved. It being thus determined that the City has retained an independent financial W191:YIL►i2■u1R"N AMIUM&A advisor in connection with such sale, the City is authorized by Section 475.60, subdivision 2(9) of the Act to negotiate the sale of the Bonds. 1.02. Award to the Purchaser and Interest Rates. The proposal of the Purchaser to purchase the Bonds is hereby found and determined to be a reasonable offer and is hereby accepted, the proposal being to purchase the Bonds at a price of $ (par amount of $ , plus net original issue premium of $ , less underwriter's discount of $ ), plus accrued interest to date of delivery, for Bonds bearing interest as follows: Year Interest Rate Year Interest Rate 2019 2026 2020 2027 2021 2028 2022 2029 2023 2030 2024 2031 2025 2032 True interest cost: % 1.03. Purchase Contract. The Mayor and City Administrator are directed to execute a contract with the Purchaser on behalf of the City. 1.04. Terms and Principal Amounts of the Bonds. The City will forthwith issue and sell the Bonds, pursuant to the Act, in the total principal amount of $5,000,000, originally dated as of October 23, 2018, in the denomination of $5,000 each or any integral multiple thereof, numbered No. R-1, upward, bearing interest as above set forth, and maturing serially on December 15 in the years and amounts as follows: Year Amount Year Amount 2019 2026 2020 2027 2021 2028 2022 2029 2023 2030 2024 2031 2025 2032 1.05. Optional Redemption. The City may elect on December 15, 2026, and on any day thereafter to prepay Bonds due on or after December 15, 2027. Redemption may be in whole or in part and if in part, at the option of the City and in such manner as the City will determine. If less than all Bonds of a maturity are called for redemption, the City will notify DTC (as defined in Section 7 hereof) of the particular amount of such maturity to be prepaid. DTC will determine by lot the amount of each participant's interest in such maturity to be redeemed and each participant will then select by lot the beneficial ownership interests in such maturity to be redeemed. Prepayments will be at a price of par plus accrued interest. 533872v1 MNI MN190-157 2 Section 2. Registration and Payment. 2.01. Registered Form. The Bonds will be issued only in fully registered form. The interest thereon and, upon surrender of each Bond, the principal amount thereof, is payable by check or draft issued by the Registrar described herein. 2.02. Dates; Interest Payment Dates. Each Bond will be dated as of the last interest payment date preceding the date of authentication to which interest on the Bond has been paid or made available for payment, unless (i) the date of authentication is an interest payment date to which interest has been paid or made available for payment, in which case the Bond will be dated as of the date of authentication, or (ii) the date of authentication is prior to the first interest payment date, in which case the Bond will be dated as of the date of original issue. The interest on the Bonds is payable on June 15 and December 15 of each year, commencing June 15, 2019, to the registered owners of record thereof as of the close of business on the first day of the month of such interest payment date, whether or not such day is a business day. 2.03. Registration. The City will appoint a bond registrar, transfer agent, authenticating agent and paying agent (the "Registrar"). The effect of registration and the rights and duties of the City and the Registrar with respect thereto are as follows: (a) Re ig ster. The Registrar must keep at its principal corporate trust office a bond register in which the Registrar provides for the registration of ownership of Bonds and the registration of transfers and exchanges of Bonds entitled to be registered, transferred or exchanged. (b) Transfer of Bonds. Upon surrender for transfer of a Bond duly endorsed by the registered owner thereof or accompanied by a written instrument of transfer, in form satisfactory to the Registrar, duly executed by the registered owner thereof or by an attorney duly authorized by the registered owner in writing, the Registrar will authenticate and deliver, in the name of the designated transferee or transferees, one or more new Bonds of a like aggregate principal amount and maturity, as requested by the transferor. The Registrar may, however, close the books for registration of any transfer after the first day of the month preceding each interest payment date and until that interest payment date. (c) Exchange of Bonds. When Bonds are surrendered by the registered owner for exchange the Registrar will authenticate and deliver one or more new Bonds of a like aggregate principal amount and maturity as requested by the registered owner or the owner's attorney in writing. (d) Cancellation. Bonds surrendered upon transfer or exchange will be promptly cancelled by the Registrar and thereafter disposed of as directed by the City. (e) Improper or Unauthorized Transfer. When a Bond is presented to the Registrar for transfer, the Registrar may refuse to transfer the Bond until the Registrar is satisfied that the endorsement on the Bond or separate instrument of transfer is valid and genuine and that the requested transfer is legally authorized. The Registrar will incur no liability for the refusal, in good faith, to make transfers which it, in its judgment, deems improper or unauthorized. (f) Persons Deemed Owners. The City and the Registrar may treat the person in whose name a Bond is registered in the bond register as the absolute owner of the Bond, whether the Bond is overdue or not, for the purpose of receiving payment of, or on account of, the principal of and interest on the Bond and for all other purposes, and payments so made to a registered owner 533872v1 MNI MN190-157 3 or upon the owner's order will be valid and effectual to satisfy and discharge the liability upon the Bond to the extent of the sum or sums so paid. (g) Taxes, Fees and Charges. The Registrar may impose a charge upon the owner thereof for a transfer or exchange of Bonds sufficient to reimburse the Registrar for any tax, fee or other governmental charge required to be paid with respect to the transfer or exchange. (h) Mutilated, Lost, Stolen or Destroved Bonds. If a Bond becomes mutilated or is destroyed, stolen or lost, the Registrar will deliver a new Bond of like amount, number, maturity date and tenor in exchange and substitution for and upon cancellation of the mutilated Bond or in lieu of and in substitution for any Bond destroyed, stolen or lost, upon the payment of the reasonable expenses and charges of the Registrar in connection therewith; and, in the case of a Bond destroyed, stolen or lost, upon filing with the Registrar of evidence satisfactory to it that the Bond was destroyed, stolen or lost, and of the ownership thereof, and upon furnishing to the Registrar an appropriate bond or indemnity in form, substance and amount satisfactory to it and as provided by law, in which both the City and the Registrar must be named as obligees. Bonds so surrendered to the Registrar will be cancelled by the Registrar and evidence of such cancellation must be given to the City. If the mutilated, destroyed, stolen or lost Bond has already matured or been called for redemption in accordance with its terms it is not necessary to issue a new Bond prior to payment. (i) Redemption. In the event any of the Bonds are called for redemption, notice thereof identifying the Bonds to be redeemed will be given by the Registrar by mailing a copy of the redemption notice by first class mail (postage prepaid) to the registered owner of each Bond to be redeemed at the address shown on the registration books kept by the Registrar and by publishing the notice if required by law. Failure to give notice by publication or by mail to any registered owner, or any defect therein, will not affect the validity of the proceedings for the redemption of Bonds. Bonds so called for redemption will cease to bear interest after the specified redemption date, provided that the funds for the redemption are on deposit with the place of payment at that time. 2.04. Apnointment of Initial Registrar. The City appoints U.S. Bank National Association, Saint Paul, Minnesota, as the initial Registrar. The Mayor and the City Administrator are authorized to execute and deliver, on behalf of the City, a contract with the Registrar. Upon merger or consolidation of the Registrar with another corporation, if the resulting corporation is a bank or trust company authorized by law to conduct such business, the resulting corporation is authorized to act as successor Registrar. The City agrees to pay the reasonable and customary charges of the Registrar for the services performed. The City reserves the right to remove the Registrar upon 30 days' notice and upon the appointment of a successor Registrar, in which event the predecessor Registrar must deliver all cash and Bonds in its possession to the successor Registrar and must deliver the bond register to the successor Registrar. On or before each principal or interest due date, without further order of this City Council, the Finance Director must transmit to the Registrar moneys sufficient for the payment of all principal and interest then due. 2.05. Execution, Authentication and Deliverv. The Bonds will be prepared under the direction of the City Administrator and executed on behalf of the City by the signatures of the Mayor and the City Administrator, provided that those signatures may be printed, engraved or lithographed facsimiles of the originals. If an officer whose signature or a facsimile of whose signature appears on the Bonds ceases to be such officer before the delivery of a Bond, that signature or facsimile will nevertheless be valid and sufficient for all purposes, the same as if the officer had remained in office until delivery. Notwithstanding such execution, a Bond will not be valid or obligatory for any purpose or entitled to any security or benefit under this resolution unless and until a certificate of authentication on the Bond has been duly executed by 533872v1 MNI MN190-157 4 the manual signature of an authorized representative of the Registrar. Certificates of authentication on different Bonds need not be signed by the same representative. The executed certificate of authentication on a Bond is conclusive evidence that it has been authenticated and delivered under this resolution. When the Bonds have been so prepared, executed and authenticated, the City Administrator will deliver the same to the Purchaser upon payment of the purchase price in accordance with the contract of sale heretofore made and executed, and the Purchaser is not obligated to see to the application of the purchase price. 2.06. Temvorary Bonds. The City may elect to deliver in lieu of printed definitive Bonds one or more typewritten temporary Bonds in substantially the form set forth in EXHIBIT A attached hereto with such changes as may be necessary to reflect more than one maturity in a single temporary bond. Upon the execution and delivery of definitive Bonds the temporary Bonds will be exchanged therefor and cancelled. Section 3. Form of Bond. 3.01. Execution of the Bonds. The Bonds will be printed or typewritten in substantially the form set forth in EXHIBIT A. 3.02. ADDrovin2 Legal Opinion. The City Administrator is authorized and directed to obtain a copy of the proposed approving legal opinion of Kennedy & Graven, Chartered, Minneapolis, Minnesota, which is to be complete except as to dating thereof and cause the opinion to be printed on or accompany each Bond. Section 4. Pavment; Security; Pledizes and Covenants. 4.01. Debt Service Fund. The Bonds will be payable from the General Obligation Tax Abatement Bonds, Series 2018A Debt Service Fund (the "Debt Service Fund") hereby created. The Debt Service Fund shall be administered and maintained by the Finance Director as a bookkeeping account separate and apart from all other funds maintained in the official financial records of the City. Abatements from the Abatement Parcels and ad valorem taxes levied for the Project are hereby pledged to the Debt Service Fund. 4.02. Construction Fund. The City hereby creates the General Obligation Tax Abatement Bonds, Series 2018A Construction Fund (the "Construction Fund"). Proceeds of the Bonds, less the appropriations made in Section 4.01(a) hereof, will be deposited in the Construction Fund to be used solely to defray expenses of the Project described in the Abatement Resolution. When the Project is completed and the cost thereof paid, the Construction Fund is to be closed and any funds remaining may be deposited in the Debt Service Fund. 4.03. General Obligation Pledee. For the prompt and full payment of the principal and interest on the Bonds, as the same respectively become due, the full faith, credit and taxing powers of the City will be and are hereby irrevocably pledged. If the balance in the Debt Service Fund is ever insufficient to pay all principal and interest then due on the Bonds and any other bonds payable therefrom, the deficiency will be promptly paid out of monies in the general fund of the City which are available for such purpose, and such general fund may be reimbursed with or without interest from the Debt Service Fund when a sufficient balance is available therein. 4.04. Pledge of Tax Lew. For the purpose of paying the principal of and interest on the Bonds, there is levied a direct annual irrepealable ad valorem tax (the "Taxes") upon all of the taxable property in the City, which will be spread upon the tax rolls and collected with and as part of other W191:YIL►i2■u1R"N AMIUMIN general taxes of the City. The Taxes will be credited to the Debt Service Fund above provided and will be in the years and amounts as attached hereto as EXHIBIT B. 4.05 Debt Service Coverage. It is hereby determined that the estimated collections of Abatements and Taxes will produce at least five percent (5%) in excess of the amount needed to meet when due the principal and interest payments on the Bonds. The tax levy herein provided is irrepealable until all of the Bonds are paid, provided that at the time the City makes its annual tax levies the Finance Director may certify to the County Auditor/Treasurer of Wright County, Minnesota (the "County Auditor/Treasurer") the amount available in the Debt Service Fund to pay principal and interest due during the ensuing year, and the County Auditor/Treasurer will thereupon reduce the levy collectible during such year by the amount so certified. 4.05 Registration of Resolution. The City Administrator is authorized and directed to file a certified copy of this resolution with the County Auditor/Treasurer and to obtain the certificate required by Section 475.63 of the Act. Section 5. Authentication of Transcrint. 5.01. Citv Proceedings and Records. The officers of the City are authorized and directed to prepare and furnish to the Purchaser and to the attorneys approving the Bonds, certified copies of proceedings and records of the City relating to the Bonds and to the financial condition and affairs of the City, and such other certificates, affidavits and transcripts as may be required to show the facts within their knowledge or as shown by the books and records in their custody and under their control, relating to the validity and marketability of the Bonds, and such instruments, including any heretofore furnished, will be deemed representations of the City as to the facts stated therein. 5.02. Certification as to Official Statement. The Mayor, the City Administrator, and the Finance Director are authorized and directed to certify that they have examined the Official Statement prepared and circulated in connection with the issuance and sale of the Bonds and that to the best of their knowledge and belief the Official Statement is a complete and accurate representation of the facts and representations made therein as of the date of the Official Statement. 5.03. Other Certificates. The Mayor, the City Administrator, and the Finance Director are hereby authorized and directed to furnish to the Purchaser at the closing such certificates as are required as a condition of sale. Unless litigation shall have been commenced and be pending questioning the Bonds or the organization of the City or incumbency of its officers, at the closing the Mayor, the City Administrator, and the Finance Director shall also execute and deliver to the Purchaser a suitable certificate as to absence of material litigation, and the Finance Director shall also execute and deliver a certificate as to payment for and delivery of the Bonds. Section 6. Tax Covenant. 6.01. Tax -Exempt Bonds. The City covenants and agrees with the holders from time to time of the Bonds that it will not take or permit to be taken by any of its officers, employees or agents any action which would cause the interest on the Bonds to become subject to taxation under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), and the Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder, in effect at the time of such actions, and that it will take or cause its officers, employees or agents to take, all affirmative action within its power that may be necessary to ensure that such interest will not become subject to taxation under the Code and applicable Treasury Regulations, as presently existing or as hereafter amended and made applicable to the Bonds. 533872v1 MNI MN190-157 6 6.02. No Rebate Required. (a) The City will comply with requirements necessary under the Code to establish and maintain the exclusion from gross income of the interest on the Bonds under Section 103 of the Code, including without limitation requirements relating to temporary periods for investments, limitations on amounts invested at a yield greater than the yield on the Bonds, and the rebate of excess investment earnings to the United States, if the Bonds (together with other obligations reasonably expected to be issued in calendar year 2018) exceed the small -issuer exception amount of $5,000,000. (b) For purposes of qualifying for the small issuer exception to the federal arbitrage rebate requirements, the City finds, determines and declares that the aggregate face amount of all tax-exempt bonds (other than private activity bonds) issued by the City (and all subordinate entities of the City) during the calendar year in which the Bonds are issued and outstanding at one time is not reasonably expected to exceed $5,000,000, all within the meaning of Section 148(f)(4)(D) of the Code. 6.03. Not Private Activity Bonds. The City further covenants not to use the proceeds of the Bonds or to cause or permit them or any of them to be used, in such a manner as to cause the Bonds to be "private activity bonds" within the meaning of Sections 103 and 141 through 150 of the Code. 6.04. Oualified Tax -Exempt Obligations. In order to qualify the Bonds as "qualified tax-exempt obligations" within the meaning of Section 265(b)(3) of the Code, the City makes the following factual statements and representations: (a) the Bonds are not "private activity bonds" as defined in Section 141 of the Code; (b) the City designates the Bonds as "qualified tax-exempt obligations" for purposes of Section 265(b)(3) of the Code; (c) the reasonably anticipated amount of tax-exempt obligations (other than private activity bonds that are not qualified 501(c)(3) bonds) which will be issued by the City (and all subordinate entities of the City) during calendar year 2018 will not exceed $10,000,000; and (d) not more than $10,000,000 of obligations issued by the City during calendar year 2018 have been designated for purposes of Section 265(b)(3) of the Code. 6.05. Procedural Requirements. The City will use its best efforts to comply with any federal procedural requirements which may apply in order to effectuate the designations made by this section. Section 7. Book -Entry System; Limited Obligation of City. 7.01. DTC. The Bonds will be initially issued in the form of a separate single typewritten or printed fully registered Bond for each of the maturities set forth in Section 1.06 hereof. Upon initial issuance, the ownership of each Bond will be registered in the registration books kept by the Registrar in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee for The Depository Trust Company, New York, New York, and its successors and assigns ("DTC"). Except as provided in this section, all of the outstanding Bonds will be registered in the registration books kept by the Registrar in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of DTC. 533872v1 MNI MN190-157 7 7.02. Participants. With respect to Bonds registered in the registration books kept by the Registrar in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of DTC, the City, the Registrar and the Paying Agent will have no responsibility or obligation to any broker dealers, banks and other financial institutions from time to time for which DTC holds Bonds as securities depository (the "Participants") or to any other person on behalf of which a Participant holds an interest in the Bonds, including but not limited to any responsibility or obligation with respect to (i) the accuracy of the records of DTC, Cede & Co. or any Participant with respect to any ownership interest in the Bonds, (ii) the delivery to any Participant or any other person (other than a registered owner of Bonds, as shown by the registration books kept by the Registrar), of any notice with respect to the Bonds, including any notice of redemption, or (iii) the payment to any Participant or any other person, other than a registered owner of Bonds, of any amount with respect to principal of, premium, if any, or interest on the Bonds. The City, the Registrar and the Paying Agent may treat and consider the person in whose name each Bond is registered in the registration books kept by the Registrar as the holder and absolute owner of such Bond for the purpose of payment of principal, premium and interest with respect to such Bond, for the purpose of registering transfers with respect to such Bonds, and for all other purposes. The Paying Agent will pay all principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds only to or on the order of the respective registered owners, as shown in the registration books kept by the Registrar, and all such payments will be valid and effectual to fully satisfy and discharge the City's obligations with respect to payment of principal of, premium, if any, or interest on the Bonds to the extent of the sum or sums so paid. No person other than a registered owner of Bonds, as shown in the registration books kept by the Registrar, will receive a certificated Bond evidencing the obligation of this resolution. Upon delivery by DTC to the City Administrator of a written notice to the effect that DTC has determined to substitute a new nominee in place of Cede & Co., the words "Cede & Co." will refer to such new nominee of DTC; and upon receipt of such a notice, the City Administrator will promptly deliver a copy of the same to the Registrar and Paying Agent. 7.03. Representation Letter. The City has heretofore executed and delivered to DTC a Blanket Issuer Letter of Representations (the "Representation Letter") which will govern payment of principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds and notices with respect to the Bonds. Any Paying Agent or Registrar subsequently appointed by the City with respect to the Bonds will agree to take all action necessary for all representations of the City in the Representation Letter with respect to the Registrar and Paying Agent, respectively, to be complied with at all times. 7.04. Transfers Outside Book -Entry Svstem. In the event the City, by resolution of the City Council, determines that it is in the best interests of the persons having beneficial interests in the Bonds that they be able to obtain Bond certificates, the City will notify DTC, whereupon DTC will notify the Participants, of the availability through DTC of Bond certificates. In such event the City will issue, transfer and exchange Bond certificates as requested by DTC and any other registered owners in accordance with the provisions of this resolution. DTC may determine to discontinue providing its services with respect to the Bonds at any time by giving notice to the City and discharging its responsibilities with respect thereto under applicable law. In such event, if no successor securities depository is appointed, the City will issue and the Registrar will authenticate Bond certificates in accordance with this resolution and the provisions hereof will apply to the transfer, exchange and method of payment thereof. 7.05. Pavments to Cede & Co. Notwithstanding any other provision of this resolution to the contrary, so long as a Bond is registered in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of DTC, payments with respect to principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bond and all notices with respect to the Bond will be made and given, respectively in the manner provided in DTC's Operational Arrangements, as set forth in the Representation Letter. 533872v1 MNI MN190-157 8 Section 8. Continuins Disclosure. 8.01. Execution of Continuing Disclosure Certificate. "Continuing Disclosure Certificate" means that certain Continuing Disclosure Certificate executed by the Mayor and City Administrator and dated the date of issuance and delivery of the Bonds, as originally executed and as it may be amended from time to time in accordance with the terms thereof. 8.02. Citv Comaliance with Provisions of Continuing Disclosure Certificate. The City hereby covenants and agrees that it will comply with and carry out all of the provisions of the Continuing Disclosure Certificate. Notwithstanding any other provision of this resolution, failure of the City to comply with the Continuing Disclosure Certificate is not to be considered an event of default with respect to the Bonds; however, any Bondholder may take such actions as may be necessary and appropriate, including seeking mandate or specific performance by court order, to cause the City to comply with its obligations under this section. Section 9. Defeasance. When all Bonds and all interest thereon have been discharged as provided in this section, all pledges, covenants and other rights granted by this resolution to the holders of the Bonds will cease, except that the pledge of the full faith and credit of the City for the prompt and full payment of the principal of and interest on the Bonds will remain in full force and effect. The City may discharge all Bonds which are due on any date by depositing with the Registrar on or before that date a sum sufficient for the payment thereof in full. If any Bond should not be paid when due, it may nevertheless be discharged by depositing with the Registrar a sum sufficient for the payment thereof in full with interest accrued to the date of such deposit. 533872v1 MNI MN190-157 9 ADOPTED BYthe City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, this 24`" day of September, 2018. Brian Stumpf, Mayor ATTEST: Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator 533872v1 MNI MN190-157 10 Extract of Minutes of Meeting of the City Council of the City of Monticello, Wright County, Minnesota Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, was duly held in the City Hall in said City on September 24, 2018, commencing at 6:30 P.M. The following members were present: and the following were absent: The resolution was presented by Member , who moved its adoption; The motion for the adoption of the resolution awarding the sale of General Obligation Tax Abatement Bonds, Series 2018A, was duly seconded by Member , and upon vote being taken thereon the following members voted in favor of the motion: and the following voted against: whereupon the resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. 533872v1 MNI MN190-157 11 EXHIBIT A FORM OF BOND No. R- UNITED STATES OF AMERICA $ STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF WRIGHT CITY OF MONTICELLO GENERAL OBLIGATION TAX ABATEMENT BOND SERIES 2018A Date of Rate Maturitv Original Issue CUSIP 12018 12018 614468 Registered Owner: Cede & Co. The City of Monticello, Minnesota, a duly organized and existing municipal corporation in Wright County, Minnesota (the "City"), acknowledges itself to be indebted and for value received hereby promises to pay to the Registered Owner specified above or registered assigns, the principal sum of $5,000,000 on the maturity date specified above, with interest thereon from the date hereof at the annual rate specified above, payable June 15 and December 15 in each year, commencing June 15, 2019, to the person in whose name this Bond is registered at the close of business on the first day (whether or not a business day) of the month of such interest payment date. The interest hereon and, upon presentation and surrender hereof, the principal hereof are payable in lawful money of the United States of America by check or draft by U.S. Bank National Association, Saint Paul, Minnesota, as Bond Registrar, Paying Agent, Transfer Agent and Authenticating Agent, or its designated successor under the Resolution described herein. For the prompt and full payment of such principal and interest as the same respectively become due, the full faith and credit and taxing powers of the City have been and are hereby irrevocably pledged. The City may elect on December 15, 2026, and on any day thereafter to prepay Bonds due on or after December 15, 2027. Redemption may be in whole or in part and if in part, at the option of the City and in such manner as the City will determine. If less than all Bonds of a maturity are called for redemption, the City will notify The Depository Trust Company ("DTC") of the particular amount of such maturity to be prepaid. DTC will determine by lot the amount of each participant's interest in such maturity to be redeemed and each participant will then select by lot the beneficial ownership interests in such maturity to be redeemed. Prepayments will be at a price of par plus accrued interest. This Bond is one of an issue in the aggregate principal amount of $5,000,000 all of like original issue date and tenor, except as to number, maturity date, redemption privilege, and interest rate, all issued pursuant to a resolution adopted by the City Council on September 19, 2018 (the "Resolution"), for the purpose of providing money to defray the expenses incurred and to be incurred to the construction of public infrastructure improvements pursuant to and in full conformity with the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota, including Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475, as amended, and Sections 469.1812 through 469.1815. The principal hereof and interest hereon are payable in part from abatements 533872v1 MNIMN190-157 A_1 collected from certain property in the City and in part from ad valorem taxes, as set forth in the Resolution to which reference is made for a full statement of rights and powers thereby conferred. The full faith and credit of the City are irrevocably pledged for payment of this Bond and the City Council has obligated itself to levy additional ad valorem taxes on all taxable property in the City in the event of any deficiency in taxes, which additional taxes may be levied without limitation as to rate or amount. The Bonds of this series are issued only as fully registered Bonds in denominations of $5,000 or any integral multiple thereof of single maturities. The City Council has designated the issue of Bonds of which this Bond forms a part as "qualified tax-exempt obligations" within the meaning of Section 265(b)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code") relating to disallowance of interest expense for financial institutions and within the $10 million limit allowed by the Code for the calendar year of issue. As provided in the Resolution and subject to certain limitations set forth therein, this Bond is transferable upon the books of the City at the principal office of the Bond Registrar, by the registered owner hereof in person or by the owner's attorney duly authorized in writing upon surrender hereof together with a written instrument of transfer satisfactory to the Bond Registrar, duly executed by the registered owner or the owner's attorney; and may also be surrendered in exchange for Bonds of other authorized denominations. Upon such transfer or exchange the City will cause a new Bond or Bonds to be issued in the name of the transferee or registered owner, of the same aggregate principal amount, bearing interest at the same rate and maturing on the same date, subject to reimbursement for any tax, fee or governmental charge required to be paid with respect to such transfer or exchange. The City and the Bond Registrar may deem and treat the person in whose name this Bond is registered as the absolute owner hereof, whether this Bond is overdue or not, for the purpose of receiving payment and for all other purposes, and neither the City nor the Bond Registrar will be affected by any notice to the contrary. IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED, RECITED, COVENANTED AND AGREED that all acts, conditions and things required by the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota to be done, to exist, to happen and to be performed preliminary to and in the issuance of this Bond in order to make it a valid and binding general obligation of the City in accordance with its terms, have been done, do exist, have happened and have been performed as so required, and that the issuance of this Bond does not cause the indebtedness of the City to exceed any constitutional or statutory limitation of indebtedness. This Bond is not valid or obligatory for any purpose or entitled to any security or benefit under the Resolution until the Certificate of Authentication hereon has been executed by the Bond Registrar by manual signature of one of its authorized representatives. 533872v1 MNI MN190-157 A-2 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Monticello, Wright County, Minnesota, by its City Council, has caused this Bond to be executed on its behalf by the facsimile or manual signatures of the Mayor and City Administrator and has caused this Bond to be dated as of the date set forth below. Dated: 92018 CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA (Facsimile) (Facsimile) Mayor City Administrator CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICATION This is one of the Bonds delivered pursuant to the Resolution mentioned within. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION :S Authorized Representative ABBREVIATIONS The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this Bond, will be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations: TEN COM -- as tenants in common TEN ENT -- as tenants by entireties JT TEN -- as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants in common UNIF GIFT MIN ACT Custodian (Cust) (Minor) under Uniform Gifts or Transfers to Minors Act, State of Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. 533872v1 MNI MN190-157 A_3 ASSIGNMENT For value received, the undersigned hereby sells, assigns and transfers unto the within Bond and all rights thereunder, and does hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint attorney to transfer the said Bond on the books kept for registration of the within Bond, with full power of substitution in the premises. Dated: Notice: The assignor's signature to this assignment must correspond with the name as it appears upon the face of the within Bond in every particular, without alteration or any change whatever. Signature Guaranteed: NOTICE: Signature(s) must be guaranteed by a financial institution that is a member of the Securities Transfer Agent Medallion Program ("STAMP"), the Stock Exchange Medallion Program ("SEMP"), the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. Medallion Signatures Program ("MSP") or other such "signature guarantee program" as may be determined by the Registrar in addition to, or in substitution for, STEMP, SEMP or MSP, all in accordance with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The Registrar will not effect transfer of this Bond unless the information concerning the assignee requested below is provided. Name and Address: (Include information for all joint owners if this Bond is held by joint account.) Please insert social security or other identifying number of assignee 533872v1 MNI MN190-157 A_4 PROVISIONS AS TO REGISTRATION The ownership of the principal of and interest on the within Bond has been registered on the books of the Registrar in the name of the person last noted below. Date of Registration Registered Owner Cede & Co. Federal ID #13-2555119 533872v1 MNI MN190-157 A-5 Signature of Officer of Registrar EXHIBIT B TAX LEVY SCHEDULE YEAR* TAX LEVY 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 * Year tax levy collected. 533872v1 MNIMN190-157 B_1 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF WRIGHT CITY OF MONTICELLO I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and Acting City Administrator of the City of Monticello, Minnesota (the "City"), do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City Council of said City held on September 24, 2018, with the original thereof on file in my office and the same is a full, true and correct copy thereof, insofar as the same relates to the issuance and sale of the City's General Obligation Tax Abatement Bonds, Series 2018A, in the original aggregate principal amount of $5,000,000. WITNESS my hand as such City Administrator and the corporate seal of the City this 24th day of September, 2018. City Administrator City of Monticello, Minnesota (SEAL) W191 iOZ1■ % Q i kyj 1'D[L`IUM&A STATE OF MINNESOTA CERTIFICATE OF COUNTY AUDITOR/TREASURER AS TO COUNTY OF WRIGHT TAX LEVY AND REGISTRATION 1, the undersigned County Auditor/Treasurer of Wright County, Minnesota, hereby certify that a certified copy of a resolution adopted by the governing body of the City of Monticello, Minnesota (the "City"), on September 24, 2018, levying taxes for the payment of the City's General Obligation Tax Abatement Bonds, Series 2018A (the "Bonds"), in the original aggregate principal amount of $5,000,000, dated as of October 23, 2018, has been filed in my office and said Bonds have been entered on the register of obligations in my office and that such tax has been levied as required by law. WITNESS My hand and official seal this day of , 2018. COUNTY AUDITOR/TREASURER, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA :A Its (SEAL) W191 iOZ1■ % Q i LVA 1 �[i RIUM7d City of Monticello, Minnesota $5,000,000.00 General Obligation Tax Abatement Bonds, Series 2018A FINAL Sources & Uses Dated 10/23/2018 1 Delivered 10/23/2018 Sources Of Funds Par Amount of Bonds Reoffering Premium Total Sources $5,000,000.00 40,882.25 $5,040,882.25 Uses Of Funds Deposit to Project Construction Fund 4,945,000.00 Total Underwriter's Discount (1.400%) 70,000.00 Costs of Issuance 24,350.00 Rounding Amount 1,532.25 Total Uses GO Abatement Bonds 2018A I SINGLE PURPOSE 1 9/19/2018 1 11:50 AM Northland Securities, Inc. $5,040,882.25 Public Finance Page 1 City of Monticello, Minnesota $5,000,000.00 General Obligation Tax Abatement Bonds, Series 2018A FINAL Debt Service Schedule Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I Fiscal Total 10/23/2018 - - 06/15/2019 - - 98,720.83 98,720.83 - 12/15/2019 275,000.00 3.000% 76,593.75 351,593.75 450,314.58 06/15/2020 - - 72,468.75 72,468.75 - 12/15/2020 305,000.00 3.000% 72,468.75 377,468.75 449,937.50 06/15/2021 - - 67,893.75 67,893.75 - 12/15/2021 310,000.00 3.000% 67,893.75 377,893.75 445,787.50 06/15/2022 - - 63,243.75 63,243.75 - 12/15/2022 320,000.00 3.000% 63,243.75 383,243.75 446,487.50 06/15/2023 - - 58,443.75 58,443.75 - 12/15/2023 330,000.00 3.000% 58,443.75 388,443.75 446,887.50 06/15/2024 - - 53,493.75 53,493.75 - 12/15/2024 340,000.00 3.000% 53,493.75 393,493.75 446,987.50 06/15/2025 - - 48,393.75 48,393.75 - 12/15/2025 350,000.00 3.000% 48,393.75 398,393.75 446,787.50 06/15/2026 - - 43,143.75 43,143.75 - 12/15/2026 360,000.00 3.000% 43,143.75 403,143.75 446,287.50 06/15/2027 - - 37,743.75 37,743.75 - 12/15/2027 370,000.00 3.000% 37,743.75 407,743.75 445,487.50 06/15/2028 - - 32,193.75 32,193.75 - 12/15/2028 385,000.00 3.000% 32,193.75 417,193.75 449,387.50 06/15/2029 - - 26,418.75 26,418.75 - 12/15/2029 395,000.00 3.000% 26,418.75 421,418.75 447,837.50 06/15/2030 - - 20,493.75 20,493.75 - 12/15/2030 405,000.00 3.125% 20,493.75 425,493.75 445,987.50 06/15/2031 - - 14,165.63 14,165.63 - 12/15/2031 420,000.00 3.250% 14,165.63 434,165.63 448,331.26 06/15/2032 - - 7,340.63 7,340.63 - 12/15/2032 435,000.00 3.375% 7,340.63 442,340.63 449,681.26 Total $5,000,000.00 - $1,266,189.60 $6,266,189.60 - Date And Term Structure Dated 10/23/2018 Delivery Date 10/23/2018 First available call date 12/15/2026 Call Price 100.000% Yield Statistics Bond Year Dollars $40,772.22 Average Life 8.154 Years Average Coupon 3.1055202% Net Interest Cost (NIC) 3.1769359% True Interest Cost (TIC) 3.1834607% All Inclusive Cost (AIC) 3.2540695% IRS Form 8038 Net Interest Cost (NIC) 3.1769359% Weighted Average Maturity 8.114 Years Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes 2.9831416% GO Abatement Bonds 2018A I SINGLE PURPOSE 1 9/19/2018 1 11:50 AM Northland Securities, Inc. Public Finance Page 2 City of Monticello, Minnesota $5,000,000.00 General Obligation Tax Abatement Bonds, Series 2018A FINAL Pricing Summary Maturity Type of Bond Coupon Yield Maturity Value Price YTM Call Date Call Price Dollar Price 12/15/2019 Serial Coupon 3.000% 2.000% 275,000.00 101.124% 278,091.00 12/15/2020 Serial Coupon 3.000% 2.200% 305,000.00 101.665% 310,078.25 12/15/2021 Serial Coupon 3.000% 2.300% 310,000.00 102.109% 316,537.90 12/15/2022 Serial Coupon 3.000% 2.400% 320,000.00 102.351% 327,523.20 12/15/2023 Serial Coupon 3.000% 2.500% 330,000.00 102.397% 337,910.10 12/15/2024 Serial Coupon 3.000% 2.600% 340,000.00 102.256% 347,670.40 12/15/2025 Serial Coupon 3.000% 2.700% 350,000.00 101.935% 356,772.50 12/15/2026 Serial Coupon 3.000% 2.800% 360,000.00 101.445% 365,202.00 12/15/2027 Serial Coupon 3.000% 2.950% 370,000.00 100.357% c 2.955% 12/15/2026 100.000% 371,320.90 12/15/2028 Serial Coupon 3.000% 3.000% 385,000.00 100.000% - - - 385,000.00 12/15/2029 Serial Coupon 3.000% 3.100% 395,000.00 99.061% 391,290.95 12/15/2030 Serial Coupon 3.125% 3.200% 405,000.00 99.247% 401,950.35 12/15/2031 Serial Coupon 3.250% 3.300% 420,000.00 99.467% 417,761.40 12/15/2032 Serial Coupon 3.375% 3.400% 435,000.00 99.718% 433,773.30 Total - - - $5,000,000.00 - - - - - $5,040,882.25 Bid Information Par Amount of Bonds $5,000,000.00 Reoffering Premium or (Discount) 40,882.25 Gross Production $5,040,882.25 Total Underwriter's Discount (1.400%) $(70,000.00) Bid (99.418%) 4,970,882.25 Total Purchase Price $4,970,882.25 Bond Year Dollars $40,772.22 Average Life 8.154 Years Average Coupon 3.1055202% Net Interest Cost (NlQ 3.1769359% True Interest Cost (TIC) 3.1834607% GO Abatement Bonds 2018A I SINGLE PURPOSE 1 9/19/2018 1 11:50 AM Northland Securities, Inc. Public Finance Page 3 City of Monticello, Minnesota $5,000,000.00 General Obligation Tax Abatement Bonds, Series 2018A FINAL Proof Of Bond Yield @ 2.9831416% Date Cashflow PV Factor Present Value Cumulative PV 10/23/2018 - 1.000000ox - - 06/15/2019 98,720.83 0.9810982x 96,854.83 96,854.83 12/15/2019 351,593.75 0.9666795x 339,878.47 436,733.29 06/15/2020 72,468.75 0.9524727x 69,024.50 505,757.80 12/15/2020 377,468.75 0.9384747x 354,244.86 860,002.66 06/15/2021 67,893.75 0.9246824x 62,780.15 922,782.81 12/15/2021 377,893.75 0.9110928x 344,296.27 1,267,079.08 06/15/2022 63,243.75 0.8977029x 56,774.10 1,323,853.18 12/15/2022 383,243.75 0.8845098x 338,982.86 1,662,836.04 06/15/2023 58,443.75 0.8715106x 50,934.35 1,713,770.39 12/15/2023 388,443.75 0.8587025x 333,557.61 2,047,328.00 06/15/2024 53,493.75 0.8460825x 45,260.13 2,092,588.12 12/15/2024 393,493.75 0.833648lx 328,035.31 2,420,623.44 06/15/2025 48,393.75 0.8213964x 39,750.45 2,460,373.89 12/15/2025 398,393.75 0.8093247x 322,429.92 2,782,803.81 06/15/2026 43,143.75 0.7974305x 34,404.14 2,817,207.95 12/15/2026 403,143.75 0.7857111x 316,754.50 3,133,962.45 06/15/2027 37,743.75 0.7741639x 29,219.85 3,163,182.30 12/15/2027 407,743.75 0.7627864x 311,021.37 3,474,203.67 06/15/2028 32,193.75 0.751576lx 24,196.05 3,498,399.72 12/15/2028 417,193.75 0.7405305x 308,944.71 3,807,344.43 06/15/2029 26,418.75 0.7296473x 19,276.37 3,826,620.80 12/15/2029 421,418.75 0.718924lx 302,968.08 4,129,588.88 06/15/2030 20,493.75 0.7083584x 14,516.92 4,144,105.80 12/15/2030 425,493.75 0.6979480x 296,972.51 4,441,078.31 06/15/2031 14,165.63 0.6876906x 9,741.57 4,450,819.88 12/15/2031 434,165.63 0.6775840x 294,183.67 4,745,003.55 06/15/2032 7,340.63 0.6676259x 4,900.79 4,749,904.35 12/15/2032 442,340.63 0.657814lx 290,977.90 5,040,882.25 Total $6,266,189.60 - $5,040,882.25 - Derivation Of Target Amount Par Amount of Bonds $5,000,000.00 Reoffering Premium or (Discount) 40,882.25 Original Issue Proceeds $5,040,882.25 GO Abatement Bonds 2018A I SINGLE PURPOSE 1 9/19/2018 111:50 AM Northland Securities, Inc. Public Finance Page 4 City of Monticello, Minnesota $5,000,000.00 General Obligation Tax Abatement Bonds, Series 2018A FINAL Derivation Of Form 8038 Yield Statistics Maturity Issuance Value Price Issuance Price Exponent Bond Years 10/23/2018 - - - - 12/15/2019 275,000.00 101.124% 278,091.00 1.1444444x 318,259.70 12/15/2020 305,000.00 101.665% 310,078.25 2.1444444x 664,945.58 12/15/2021 310,000.00 102.109% 316,537.90 3.1444444x 995,335.84 12/15/2022 320,000.00 102.351% 327,523.20 4.1444444x 1,357,401.71 12/15/2023 330,000.00 102.397% 337,910.10 5.1444444x 1,738,359.74 12/15/2024 340,000.00 102.256% 347,670.40 6.1444444x 2,136,241.46 12/15/2025 350,000.00 101.935% 356,772.50 7.1444444x 2,548,941.31 12/15/2026 360,000.00 101.445% 365,202.00 8.1444444x 2,974,367.40 12/15/2027 370,000.00 100.357% 371,320.90 9.1444444x 3,395,523.34 12/15/2028 385,000.00 100.000% 385,000.00 10.1444444x 3,905,611.11 12/15/2029 395,000.00 99.061% 391,290.95 11.1444444x 4,360,720.25 12/15/2030 405,000.00 99.247% 401,950.35 12.1444444x 4,881,463.70 12/15/2031 420,000.00 99.467% 417,761.40 13.1444444x 5,491,241.51 12/15/2032 435,000.00 99.718% 433,773.30 14.1444444x 6,135,482.34 Total $5,000,000.00 - $5,040,882.25 - $40,903,894.99 IRS Form 8038 Weighted Average Maturity = Bond Years/Issue Price 8.114 Years Total Interest from Debt Service 1,266,189.60 Reoffering (Premium) or Discount (40,882.25) Total Interest 1,225,307.35 NIC = Interest / (Issue Price * Average Maturity) 2.9955762% Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes 2.9831416% GO Abatement Bonds 2018A I SINGLE PURPOSE 1 9/19/2018 1 11:50 AM Northland Securities, Inc. Public Finance Page 5 City of Monticello, Minnesota $5,000,000.00 General Obligation Tax Abatement Bonds, Series 2018A FINAL Detail Costs Of Issuance Dated 10/23/2018 1 Delivered 10/23/2018 COSTS OF ISSUANCE DETAIL Bond Counsel $6,500.00 Rating Agency Fee $15,000.00 Pricing Opinion $2,000.00 Paying Agent $850.00 TOTAL $24,350.00 GO Abatement Bonds 2018A I SINGLE PURPOSE 1 9/19/2018 111:50 AM Northland Securities, Inc. Public Finance Page 6 City of Monticello, Minnesota $5,000,000.00 General Obligation Tax Abatement Bonds, Series 2018A FINAL 105% Levy Total $6,266,189.60 $6,579,499.08 $5,0009000.00 $1,5799499.08 GO Abatement Bonds 2018A I SINGLE PURPOSE 1 9/19/2018 1 11:50 AM Northland Securities, Inc. Public Finance Page 7 Abatement Levy Collection Date Total P+I 105% Levy Levy City Net Levy Year Year 12/15/2019 450,314.58 472,830.31 275,000.00 197,830.31 2018 2019 12/15/2020 449,937.50 472,434.38 305,000.00 167,434.38 2019 2020 12/15/2021 445,787.50 468,076.88 310,000.00 158,076.88 2020 2021 12/15/2022 446,487.50 468,811.88 320,000.00 148,811.88 2021 2022 12/15/2023 446,887.50 469,231.88 330,000.00 139,231.88 2022 2023 12/15/2024 446,987.50 469,336.88 340,000.00 129,336.88 2023 2024 12/15/2025 446,787.50 469,126.88 350,000.00 119,126.88 2024 2025 12/15/2026 446,287.50 468,601.88 360,000.00 108,601.88 2025 2026 12/15/2027 445,487.50 467,761.88 370,000.00 97,761.88 2026 2027 12/15/2028 449,387.50 471,856.88 385,000.00 86,856.88 2027 2028 12/15/2029 447,837.50 470,229.38 395,000.00 75,229.38 2028 2029 12/15/2030 445,987.50 468,286.88 405,000.00 63,286.88 2029 2030 12/15/2031 448,331.26 470,747.82 420,000.00 50,747.82 2030 2031 12/15/2032 449.681.26 472.165.32 435.000.00 37.165.32 2031 2032 Total $6,266,189.60 $6,579,499.08 $5,0009000.00 $1,5799499.08 GO Abatement Bonds 2018A I SINGLE PURPOSE 1 9/19/2018 1 11:50 AM Northland Securities, Inc. Public Finance Page 7 CREDIT OPINION Monticello (City of) M N 7 September 2018 Update to credit analysis Summary The Citv of Monticello (A2) benefits from a strong operating history, ample reserves and favorable resident income levels. The city's credit attributes are balanced by a highly concentrated tax base, elevated fixed costs and the city's ongoing support for a city -owned, Contacts competitive fiber optic utility, which has required subsidies from other city funds. Benjamin J VanMetre +1.312.706.9951 Analyst Credit strengths ben.vanmetre@moodys.com Coley J Anderson +1.312.706.9961 » Favorable resident income levels AVP -Analyst coley.anderson@moodys.com » Strong reserves across operating funds and essential enterprise funds CLIENT SERVICES » Relatively modest pension burden Americas 1-212-553-1653 Credit challenges Asia Pacific 852-3551-3077 » Substantial tax base concentration, with a nuclear power plant comprising 60% of Japan 81-3-5408-4100 assessed valuation EMEA 44-20-7772-5454 » Continued ownership and operating support of a competitive fiber optic utility » Elevated fixed costs Rating outlook Outlooks are usually not assigned to local government credits with this amount of debt. Factors that could lead to an upgrade » Significant expansion and diversification of the city's tax base » Sustained improvement in the performance of the fiber optic utility » Reduced leverage and fixed costs Factors that could lead to a downgrade » Challenges with city's largest taxpayer » Material reduction of reserves or available liquidity » Increased support from the city to the fiber optic utility Key indicators Exhibit 1 Monticello (City of) MN 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Economy/Tax Base Total Full Value ($000) $1,336,549 $1,348,638 $1,648,007 $1,775,428 $1,911,838 Population 12,841 12,974 13,065 13,214 13,214 Full Value Far Capita $104,085 $103,949 $126,139 $134,360 $144,683 Median Family Income (% of USMedian) 135.3% 130.1% 122.5% 113.71/ 113.71/ Finances Operat ing Fbvenue ($000) $13,568 $13,781 $14,403 $12,644 $11,842 Fund Balance ($000) $6,407 $7,828 $10,256 $9,686 $9,719 Cash Balance ($000) $6,543 $8,340 $10,824 $10,626 $10,931 Fund Balance as a % of Pevenues 47.2% 56.8% 71.2% 76.6% 82.1% Cash Balance as a % of Revenues 48.20/ 60.5% 75.2% 84.0% 92.3% Debt/Pensions Net Direct Debt ($000) $22,937 $24,061 $21,578 $20,681 $21,640 3-YearAverageof Moody's ANR-($000) $9,995 $10,698 $9,573 $10,774 $10,903 Net Direct Debt / Operating Fevenues (x) 1.7x 1.7x 1.5x 1.6x 1.8x Net Direct Debt / Full Value (%) 1.7/ 1.8% 1.3% 1.2% 1.1% Moody's- adjusted Net F2nsion Liability (3 -yr average) to Revenues (x) 0.7x 0.8x 0.7x 0.9x 0.9x Moody's- adjusted Net Pension Liability (3 -yr average) to Full Value (%) 0.71% 0.8% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% Sources: Audited Financial Statements, Moody's Investors Service and U.S. Census Bureau Profile Encompassing approximately 9 square miles, the city is located in Wright County approximately 45 miles northwest of the Twin Cities (MinneaDolis, Aa1 negative; St. Paul, Aal negative) metropolitan area and 25 miles south of the City of St. Cloud (Aa2). Detailed credit considerations Economy and tax base: highly concentrated tax base; top taxpayer, Xcel Energy, has long-term operating license The city's moderately sized $2 billion tax base is expected to remain stable given recent facility upgrades and investments by the city's largest taxpayer, Xcel Energy Inc. (A3 stable). Xcel completed significant power enhancements and expansions in recent years, driving significant increases in the city's assessed value. The 600 megawatt nuclear station now comprises a substantial 60% of the city's assessed value. The plant employs approximately 3,000 during peak refueling and maintenance periods and 700 during normal operating periods. The plant opened in 1970 and is licensed to operate through 2030. The plant's expected long-term presence, reinforced by its stable operations and the company's decision to undergo recent substantial plant upgrades somewhat mitigates the risks inherent in tax base concentration of this scale. As of May 2018, Wright County's unemployment rate (2.4%) was on par with the state's rate (2.5%) and below the national (3.6%) rate. The city's median family income is estimated at 114% of the nation median. Financial operations and reserves: healthy reserves; continued support of nonessential telecommunications enterprise Monticello's financial profile will likely remain stable despite ongoing support for the city's fiber optic utility. The city closed fiscal 2017 with an available fund balance of $9.7 million, equal to a strong 82% of revenue across the general fund and debt service fund. The 2017 reserves exceed the city's formal policy of maintaining reserves equal to 65% of operating expenditures. Officials report that year- to-date general fund operations are tracking toward a small surplus for fiscal 2018 and management expects balanced operations for fiscal 2019. The city typically operates with a structural surplus in the general fund and transfers the year-end surplus to the capital projects fund for pay -go capital. This publication does not announce a credit rating action. For any credit ratings referenced in this publication, please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com for the most updated credit rating action information and rating history. 2 7 September 2018 Monticello (City of) MN: Update to credit analysis Monticello owns a fiber optic utility that requires ongoing city support. The utility operates and offers cable, telephone, and internet services. Despite reduced expenditures, revenue pressures are ongoing due to continued competition for customer accounts which somewhat limits the city's ability to raise system rates. In 2016, the city entered into an agreement with a private vendor to operate the fiber optics system for five years. The city will continue subsidizing the telecommunication enterprise with the liquor fund and, per the agreement, will be required to share any profits with the third party vendor. Additionally, should the fiber optic utility require support beyond what the liquor fund can provide, the city may elect to tap into its general fund reserves or other reserves in order to keep the system viable. Material reductions in operating reserves could lead to downward movement in the city's GO rating. To date, however, revenues from the city's municipal liquor fund have been sufficient to support the fiber optic utility. During fiscal 2017, the liquor enterprise generated more than $600,000 in operating income, net of depreciation, and the city supported the telecommunication enterprise with cash transfers from the municipal liquor fund of $180,000. Management expects the annual transfer to remain at approximately $150,000 going forward though the amount may vary depending on residential development activity. LIQUIDITY The city closed fiscal 2017 with an operating fund net cash position of $10.9 million, or an ample 92% of operating revenue. The city closed fiscal 2017 with a combine cash position of $12 million across its major enterprise funds. Debt and pensions: elevated fixed costs The city's leverage related to long-term debt and pension liabilities is moderate. The city has a net debt burden of $28 million, equal to 1.4% of full value and 2.3x fiscal 2017 operating revenue. The city plans to issue approximately $7 million in 2019 as a part of its capital plan. The city's adjusted net pension liability (ANPL) totaled $11 million in fiscal 2017, equal to 0.5% of full value and 0.9x revenue. In comparison, the city's reported net pension liability, based on the use of different discount rates, was $3 million. The city's total fixed costs, inclusive of debt service, pension contributions, and other post -employment benefit (OPEB) costs, are equal to an elevated 39% of fiscal 2017 operating revenue. The city's 2012 default on the fiber optic utility revenue bonds has limited implications for Monticello's GO credit quality given the city made no legal or other promise to pay debt service from any source other than the pledged revenues. However, the city's decision to issue GO debt to finance the settlement with the revenue bondholders somewhat weakened the overall GO credit profile. In 2008, Monticello issued $26.4 million of fiber optic utility revenue bonds for the construction of a fiber optic system. The project bonds were approved by a referendum that garnered 74% voter support. When the bonds (unrated) were originally sold, the security was expressly limited to net revenues generated from the utility. The city made as scheduled interest only debt service payments from June 2009 through June 2012. Capitalized interest provided debt service through June 2011, and transfers from the municipal liquor fund were the primary source for the December 2011 and June 2012 debt service payments. On June 6, 2012 the city notified the trustee, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (Aal stable) that it would no longer make required monthly sinking fund payments. A technical default occurred on July 1, 2012 because the net revenues of the utility were insufficient to make the sinking fund payment. On December 1, 2012, the first principal payment default occurred. Under the threat of litigation from bondholders, the city and the trustee negotiated a settlement agreement whereby the city paid $5.75 million (estimated 25% recovery) in exchange for release from any future claims from bondholders for debt service payments on the revenue bonds, as well as the ability to continue to own and operate the fiber optic utility. The Settlement Agreement was approved in a Final Approval Order signed by a US District Court judge on September 15, 2014. All bondholders were included as a part of the class action suit against the city. The city financed the settlement with GO bonds contributing slightly to the city's debt burden. DEBT STRUCTURE All of the district's direct debt is fixed rate. Principal amortization is average with 83% of outstanding principal retired in 10 years. DEBT -RELATED DERIVATIVES The city has no derivative agreements. PENSIONS AND OPEB The city participates in two multiple -employer cost-sharing plans, the General Employees Retirement Fund (GERF) and the Public Employees Police and Fire Fund (PEPFF). Minnesota statutes establish local government retirement contributions as a share of annual 3 7 September 2018 Monticello (City of) MN: Update to credit analysis payroll. Employer contribution rates are currently set at 7.5% of payroll for GERF and at 16.2% of payroll for PEPFF. The city's total fiscal 2017 pension contribution was approximately $270,000. Statutory contribution levels have not kept pace with growing unfunded liabilities in state-wide pension plans. Contributions to PEPFF from all participating governments in aggregate amounted to 90% of the plan's "tread water" indicator in 20171 The state of Minnesota approved legislation in 2018 that will modify benefits and modestly increase contributions for some pension plans. Employer contributions from cities to the police and fire plan, for example, will modestly increase to 17.7% by 2020 from the current rate of 16.2%. Because employer contributions will not rise significantly, cities are unlikely to contend with material budget strain from the increases. OPEB obligations do not represent a material cost for the city. The city's most recent unfunded actuarial accrued liability (UAAL) was less than $400,000. Management and governance: strong institutional framework Minnesota cities have an Institutional Framework score of Aa, which is strong. Institutional Framework scores measure a sector's legal ability to increase revenues and decrease expenditures. The sector has one or more major revenue sources that are not subject to any caps. Revenues tend to be predictable, as cities rely primarily on property taxes and state Local Government Aid (LGA), which is distributed based on demographic and tax base factors. Revenue -raising flexibility is moderate as cities generally benefit from unlimited levying authority, except during years in which the state has imposed limits. Levy limits are not currently in place for cities. Across the sector, fixed and mandated costs are relatively high. Minnesota has public sector unions, which can limit the ability to cut expenditures. Expenditures mostly consist of personnel costs, which are highly predictable. The city's largest source of operating revenues is property taxes, which comprised 75% of fiscal 2017 revenue across the General Fund and Debt Service Fund. The city typically increases its property tax levy by 2% to 5% annually and expects to continue this practice going forward which will help maintain the city's healthy financial profile. The city's continued commitment to the fiber optic utility creates a contingent liability exposure. However, operations have started to stabilize after the decision to contracting with a private vendor. Endnotes 1 Employer contributions that tread water equal the sum of current year service cost and interest on reported net pension liabilities at the start of the year, using reported assumptions. If plan assumptions are met exactly, contributions equal to the tread water indicator will prevent the reported net pension liabilities from growing. 7 September 2018 Monticello (City of) MN: Update to credit analysis © 2018 Moody's Corporation, Moody's Investors Service, Inc., Moody's Analytics, Inc. and/or their licensors and affiliates (collectively, "MOODY'S"). All rights reserved CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE, INC. AND ITS RATINGS AFFILIATES ("MIS") ARE MOODY'S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT -LIKE SECURITIES, AND MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS MAY INCLUDE MOODY'S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT -LIKE SECURITIES. MOODY'S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL, FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY, CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS MAY ALSO INCLUDE QUANTITATIVE MODEL -BASED ESTIMATES OF CREDIT RISK AND RELATED OPINIONS OR COMMENTARY PUBLISHED BY MOODY'S ANALYTICS, INC. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. NEITHER CREDIT RATINGS NOR MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY'S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS AND PUBLISHES MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL, WITH DUE CARE, MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE. MOODY'S CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY RETAIL INVESTORS AND IT WOULD BE RECKLESS AND INAPPROPRIATE FOR RETAIL INVESTORS TO USE MOODY'S CREDIT RATINGS OR MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS WHEN MAKING AN INVESTMENT DECISION. IF IN DOUBT YOU SHOULD CONTACT YOUR FINANCIAL OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL ADVISER. ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY'S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY ANY PERSON AS A BENCHMARK AS THAT TERM IS DEFINED FOR REGULATORY PURPOSES AND MUST NOT BE USED IN ANY WAY THAT COULD RESULT IN THEM BEING CONSIDERED A BENCHMARK. All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY'S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided "AS IS" without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third -party sources. However, MOODY'S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing the Moody's publications. To the extent permitted by law, MOODY'S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability to any person or entity for any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information, even if MOODY'S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers is advised in advance of the possibility of such losses or damages, including but not limited to: (a) any loss of present or prospective profits or (b) any loss or damage arising where the relevant financial instrument is not the subject of a particular credit rating assigned by MOODY'S. To the extent permitted by law, MOODY'S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for any direct or compensatory losses or damages caused to any person or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud, willful misconduct or any other type of liability that, for the avoidance of doubt, by law cannot be excluded) on the part of, or any contingency within or beyond the control of, MOODY'S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information. NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY SUCH RATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY'S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER. Moody's Investors Service, Inc., a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Corporation ("MCO"), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by Moody's Investors Service, Inc. have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to Moody's Investors Service, Inc. for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,500 to approximately $2,500,000. MCO and MIS also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of MIS's ratings and rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold ratings from MIS and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at www.moodvs.com under the heading "Investor Relations — Corporate Governance— Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy." Additional terms for Australia only: Any publication into Australia of this document is pursuant to the Australian Financial Services License of MOODY'S affiliate, Moody's Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657AFSL 336969 and/or Moody's Analytics Australia Pty Ltd ABN 94 105 136 972 AFSL 383569 (as applicable). This document is intended to be provided only to "wholesale clients" within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY'S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a "wholesale client" and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to "retail clients" within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. MOODY'S credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail investors. It would be reckless and inappropriate for retail investors to use MOODY'S credit ratings or publications when making an investment decision. If in doubt you should contact your financial or other professional adviser. Additional terms for Japan only: Moody's Japan K.K. ("MJKK") is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Group Japan G.K., which is wholly-owned by Moody's Overseas Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO. Moody's SF Japan K.K. ("MSFJ") is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of MJKK. MSFJ is not a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization ("NRSRO"). Therefore, credit ratings assigned by MSFJ are Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings. Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings are assigned by an entity that is not a NRSRO and, consequently, the rated obligation will not qualify for certain types of treatment under U.S. laws. MJKK and MSFJ are credit rating agencies registered with the Japan Financial Services Agency and their registration numbers are FSA Commissioner (Ratings) No. 2 and 3 respectively. MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) hereby disclose that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from JPY200,000 to approximately JPY350,000,000. MJKK and MSFJ also maintain policies and procedures to address Japanese regulatory requirements. REPORT NUMBER 1139853 7 September 2018 Monticello (City of) MN: Update to credit analysis Contacts Benjamin J VanMetre Analyst ben.vanmetre@moodys.com MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE +1.312.706.9951 Coley J Anderson AVP -Analyst coley.anderson@moodys.com CLIENT SERVICES +1.312.706.9961 Americas Asia Pacific Japan EMEA 1-212-553-1653 852-3551-3077 81-3-5408-4100 44-20-7772-5454 7 September 2018 Monticello (City of) MN: Update to credit analysis City Council Agenda: 09/24/18 2G. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2018-81 declaring costs to be assessed, ordering preparation of assessment roll and calling for an Assessment Hearing on October 22, 2018 to adopt assessments for the improvements to 7th Street, Chelsea Road and Washington Street as related to the Fallon Avenue Overpass Proiect, City Proiect No.16C006 (SB) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The Fallon Avenue Overpass project is currently under construction and at this time, is anticipated to be complete and open to traffic by November 15, 2018. Street and pathway improvements on Chelsea Road is substantially complete. Street and pathway improvements along 7th Street is currently under construction and is anticipated to be complete by November 15, 2018. A public hearing was held for the project on February 26, 2018 addressing street, sidewalk and trail improvements for purposes of considering assessments to the benefitting property owners on 7th Street, Chelsea Road and Washington Street as part of the Fallon Avenue Overpass project. Assessments for the Fallon Avenue bridge, roundabouts, landscaping and aesthetics were not included due to the regional benefit to the area. The following improvements proposed to be assessed are listed below: Washington Street • Roadway reconstruction from 7th Street, approximately 460 feet north of 7th street, to the railroad crossing • Concrete sidewalk extension on the west side between 7th Street and the railroad crossing 7th Street • Roadway reconstruction between approximately 300 feet west of Washington Street and 500 feet east of the proposed Fallon Avenue connection • Concrete sidewalk extension on the south side of 7th Street from Washington Street to the proposed Fallon Avenue connection Fallon Avenue • Bituminous trail extension on the east side of Fallon Avenue, from 7th Street, along the overpass to approximately 400 feet south of Chelsea Road within the project limits. This trail is to be extended south to School Boulevard and beyond with a future project. Chelsea Road • Bituminous trail extension on the north side of Chelsea Road, west of Fallon Avenue, within the project limits. This trail has been extended west to Edmonson Avenue with the Chelsea Road reconstruction project, City Project No. 17C001. • Concrete sidewalk extension on the south side of Chelsea Road, west of Fallon Avenue, within the project limits. This sidewalk has been extended west to Cedar Street with the Chelsea Road reconstruction project, City Project No. 17C001. City Council Agenda: 09/24/18 A preliminary assessment roll was presented at the public hearing for the project in accordance with Minnesota Statute 429. Now that construction is or is anticipated to be substantially complete, a final assessment roll is being presented at this time for consideration. Wright County requires that assessments be certified to the County Auditor by November 30, 2018 for collection with 2019 property taxes. This deadline can be met by calling for the assessment hearing to be held at the October 22, 2018 City Council meeting. By conducting the assessment hearing on October 22, 2018 adequate time for publication and mailing of notices will be provided to satisfy the requirements for public improvement projects in accordance with Minnesota State Statutes Chapter 429. The assessment methodology proposed is the same as described at the public hearing for the project. Special assessments to the benefitting adjacent property owners are proposed for street, trail and sidewalk improvements in accordance with the City's assessment policy. The rates identified with the preliminary assessment roll included with the feasibility report and presented at the February 26, 2018 public hearing, are proposed to be reduced by approximately 17% to 33%, depending on the improvement, as the estimated final project costs are lower. It should be noted that the trail and sidewalk rates are the same as the Chelsea Road improvement project. Below is a summary of the preliminary and proposed final rates. Street 7th Street (West of Washington Street) ..................................................................................................................._ 7th Street (East of Washington Street) Washington Street 7th Street Washington Street Chelsea Road Chelsea Road ............................................................ Chelsea Road ............................................................ Fallon Avenue ............................................................ Fallon Avenue TOTAL Type of Assessment Street Reconstruction Mill and Overlay Street Reconstruction Sidewalk (Multi -Family Residential) .......................................................................................................... Sidewalk (Multi -Family Residential) ..................................................................................................... Sidewalk (Industrial) Sidewalk (Commercial) Trail (Industrial) Trail (Commercial) Preliminary Proposed Rate Final Rate 2/26/18 9/24/18 $90/FF $75/FF .......................................................... $36/FF ..................................................... $30/FF $90/FF $75/FF $13.5/FF $9/FF ....................................................:........................................... $13.5/FF $9/FF Trail (Industrial, Residential) $13.50/FF 2 City Council Agenda: 09/24/18 The total assessment amount were reduced by approximately 20% from the amounts presented at the public hearing on February 26, 2018. Enclosed is the proposed final assessment roll. The assessment is proposed at a 10 -year term at a 5.5% interest rate. Al. Budget Impact: The total estimated project cost identified at the time the project was awarded in May was $8.6M. This amount will increase or decrease based on actual construction costs, condemnation process with the Bluffs and BNSF permit cost share agreements in progress. Funding for the project is to come from the issue of abatement bonds for 2017, 2018 and 2019. Special assessments to the benefitting property owners will be a method to repay a portion of the debt along with the approved advancement of State Aid funds and the $2.1 million in federal funds available October 1, 2020 or earlier if available. Assessments to the benefitting properties for street, sidewalk and trail improvements total $164,283 using methodology in accordance with the City's assessment policy. Of this total, $50,182 is assigned to City -owned parcels along 7th Street, which include the properties purchased from St. Henry's Church. A2. Staff Workload Impact: Impacts to staff workload are routine for this process and include the required mailings and notices to the benefitting properties. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to adopt Resolution 2018-81 declaring costs to be assessed, ordering preparation of assessment roll and calling for an Assessment Hearing on October 22, 2018 to adopt assessments for the improvements to 7th Street, Chelsea Road and Washington Street as related to the Fallon Avenue Overpass Project, City Project No.16C006. 2. Motion to deny adoption of Resolution 2018-81 at this time. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends approving Alternative #1. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Resolution 2018-81 B. Draft Final Assessment Roll and Map CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2018-81 DECLARING COSTS TO BE ASSESSED, ORDERING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT ROLL, AND CALLING FOR AN ASSESSMENT HEARING TO ADOPT AN ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS TO 7TH STREET, CHELSEA ROAD AND WASHINGTON STREET AS RELATED TO THE FALLON AVENUE OVERPASS PROJECT, CITY PROJECT NO 16CO06 WHEREAS, contracts have been let and the project is substantially complete and includes street reconstruction, curb and gutter; sanitary sewer, storm sewer and water supply systems; sidewalks; pathways; railway crossings; signage; and other necessary appurtenant work: WHEREAS, the total estimated costs of the improvements are $8.6 million; NOW THEREFORE BE IT HEREB Y RESOL VED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTICELL0, MINNESOTA AS FOLLOWS. 1. The City Council hereby determines that $164.283.23 shall be assessed against benefitted property owners based upon benefits received without regard to cash valuation. 2. The City Administrator shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land without regard to cash valuation as provided by law, and he shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in his office for public inspection. 3. A hearing shall be held on the 22"d day of October, 2018 at 6:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers at the Monticello Community Center to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. 4. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing and shall state in the notice the total cost of the improvement. The Clerk shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to the hearing. 5. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment to the City, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of the assessment. Payment of the balance in whole must be made before November 23, 2018, or interest will be charged through December 31St of the succeeding year for the first year's portion of the assessment. In subsequent years, the property owner may at any time thereafter, pay to the City the balance of the assessment remaining unpaid after the current year, provided such payment is made prior to November 151H 6. The City Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certification of this assessment to the county auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the county. Such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. ADOPTED BY the Monticello City Council this 24th day of September, 2018. CITY OF MONTICELLO Brian Stumpf, Mayor ATTEST: Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator Draft Final Assessment Roll - Fallon Avenue Overpass- 7th Street, Chelsea Road and Washington Street Improvements s/,srzo,e Fl nue Overpass-Oh St— Ch.l. Roatl.nd W.sdin9lon Shcetlmorovemenis TYO OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA CLYPEOJ NO. 16 W SB PROJECT NO. 2596 000 TOTAL 'RONT FOOTACa RA'EIFF PROPERTY 7TH WASHINGTON No IDENTIFICATION NO PROPERTY OWNER PROPERTY MAILING Land Use 7TH WASHINGTON 7TH WASHINGTON FALLON CHELSEA CHELSEA STREET STREET SIDEWALK IFIDI ADDRESS STREET STREET SIDEWALK SIDEWALK TRAIL SIDEWALK TRAIL RATEIFF RATEIFF RATEIFF Mao ID PID Owner Name Properly Address Lild Ilse 1 155013002050 WCG BUILDING PARTNERS LLC 213 CHELSEA RD MONTICELLO MN 55362 Intlusirlal 4030 $900 2 155131001010 BOBER FAMILY LP ]1355TH AVE NE SAUK RAPIDS MN 56379 C.mmemlal 4020 2]40 $1800 3 155066001010 WSI INDUSTRIES INC 213 CHELSEA RD MONTICELLO MN 55362 Intlusidal 7561 4 155075001010 AEI PROPERTIES LLC 301 CHELSEA ROAD MONTICELLO MN 55362 Intlusidal 4720 5 155115000010 CITY OF MONTICELLO 505 WALNUT ST STE I MONTICELLO MN 55362 Resitlen8al 4463 1790 8 155115002020 CITY OF MONTICELLO 505 WALNUT ST STE I MONTICELLO MN 55362 Res1tlen8al 1160 1160 ] 155115002010 CITY OF MONTICELLO 505 WALNUT ST STE I MONTICELLO MN 55362 Res1tlen8al 2954 2954 8 155050000010 CITY OF MONTICELLO 505 WALNUT ST STE I MONTICELLO MN 55362 Res1tlen8al 1220 9 155050001050 BLUFFS IN MONTICELLO LLC 3339 CRYSTAL BAY RD WAYZATA MN 55391 .1— Res 84 ] 84 ] 10 155050001040 BLUFFS IN MONTICELLO LLC 3339 CRYSTAL BAY RD WAYZATA MN 55391 Wol-Famlly Res 84 ] 84 ] 11 155050001030 BLUFFS IN MONTICELLO LLC 3339 CRYSTAL BAY RD WAYZATA MN 55391 Wol-Famlly Res 84 ] 84 ] 12 155050001020 BLUFFS IN MONTICELLO LLC 3339 CRYSTAL BAY RD WAYZATA MN 55391 id-Famlly R ea ] ea ] 13 155050001010 BLUFFS IN MONTICELLO LLC 3339 CRYSTAL BAY RD WAYZATA MN 55391 id-Famlly R 1.2 1.2 14 155050000020 BLUFFS IN MONTICELLO LLC 3339 CRYSTAL BAY RD WAYZATA MN 55391 Commercial 4327 16 155015042010 BLUFFS IN MONTICELLO LLC 3339 CRYSTAL BAY RD WAYZATA MN 55391 Wid-Famlly Rss 1541 311 3 2111 1] 155050002010 BLUFFS IN MONTICELLO LLC 3339 CRYSTAL BAY RD WAYZATA MN 55391 Wid-Famlly Res 2148 3564 18 155115001010 CITY OF MONTICELLO 505 WALNUT ST STE 1 MONTICELLO MN 55352 Residen4el 556 2 NOTES TOTAL 3,029 SO 66]]0 90040 29500 1,05300 ]1].00 756.00 P,=#2 assessetl 50%of Ue hoot footaoe alon0 Fallon Ave br corner lot lreil assessment since Uere is.o ase.. Fallon Ace Is consitleretl Ue sitle lot side of Ue oroceM CM1elsea Roatl Is Ue honl sitle PrcoeI W assessI 25=hhl front foota.e.loop Fallon Aire br corner lot Ireil assessment since IM1ere is no access F nsitleretl Ue sitle lot sitle of Ue oroceM Ch.—IR oatl Is Ue. sitle Prooertv#5 assessetl 25%ofiM1efronifoota.ealono Fallon Aire hr cornerlolireil assessmen[since IM1ere is no accessF nsitleretl Uesitle lot sitle of Ue oroceM CM1elsea Roatl is Ue honlsltle Property#16 assessetl 25ofiM1e front foota.e .loop ]iM1 SVeet for iM1e comer lot slreel assessment since IM1ere is no tlirecl ac es W asM1molon St Is Ue hoot sitle Pmoertv#1]assessed 25%1of H. pont ioots.eIII— W hoolon Sheet for H. corner Iot slreel assessment since IM1ere was no direct access on.,toor.rect Construct— 7U Street is Ue front side $30 00 $3000 $900 $3000 $900 $30 00 $3000 $900 $3000 $900 $3000 $900 ET�T�P 7TH WASHINGTON TOTAL STREET STREET SIDEWALK TRAIL PROPOSED TRAIL ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT RATEIFF $1800 .00 $900 $900 $1338900 $348000 $996200 $3 660 00 $2501 00 $2501 00 $2 541 00 $2 541 00 $4 626 00 $3245250 121113111171 $644400 $668250 $16.686.00 $398].00 $396]oo $0932.00 $361800 $855000 36804 00 $6804 00 $106200 $106200 $002 ]S $13]91]5 $1040.00 3452400 $2658.60 $1152080 $366000 $]62.30 $330330 $762.30 $3303.30 $762.30 $3303.30 $76230 $330330 $138]80 U013W $3245250 $265500 $2889188 $1312650 i6 fiE600 ' .283.24 K W2598d00VWmin\DocsWssessmenk\02588-000_Drah Final Assessment Roll 001818 Assessment Map N CITY of 7th St, Washington Ave, - �► Monticello Chelsea Rd, and Fallon Ave Improvements A0 400 rrVL..7 Monticello, MN Feet S+ City Project No. 16CO06 Date: 9/18/18 1 inch = 400 feet City Council Agenda 09/24/2018 2H. Consideration of approving the purchase of a 2019 Vactor 2100 Plus through the state contract from MacQueen Equipment for $442,290.00 and declaring the 1999 Vac -Con truck as surplus property. (MS/ML) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Council is asked to consider authorizing the replacement of Water and Sewer jetting and vacuum truck, a 1999 Vac -Con VIN #1HTGCADT7XH625350, and declaring this vehicle as surplus. City staff demoed several trucks and selected the Vactor 2100 Plus as the truck that we feel will provide the best value for the city. This truck is a critical piece of equipment that is used for cleaning and maintaining the cities sanitary and storm sewer infrastructure. The state contract price from MacQueen Equipment Inc. for the 2019 Vactor 2100 Plus is $442,290.00. These trucks are custom made and delivery is expected in early 2019. The existing Vac -Con will be surplused via a public auction. Al. Budget Impact: In preparation for these purchases, the Sewer Department has budgeted appropriate funds in the 2019 Sewage Fund. The Sewage Fund is an enterprise fund supported entirely by user charges. A2. Staff Workload Impact: The staff workload impact of a new unit will be very positive. Updating the truck will improve staff efficiencies with fewer breakdowns and safer equipment. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS 1. Motion to approve the specifications and authorize purchase of a 2019 Vactor 2100 Plus from MacQueen Equipment Inc. for $442,290.00 based upon the state contract pricing. Authorization is also requested to declare the 1999 Vac -Con, VIN#1HTGCADT7XH625350, surplus. 2. Motion to deny the replacement of the 1999 Vac -Con truck at this time. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends Alternative #1 to replace the 1999 Vac -Con with a 2019 Vactor 2100 Plus. By purchasing this equipment, we will increase productivity and reduce the cost of maintenance in the department. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • State contract pricing for new Vactor 2100 from MacQueen Equipment, Inc. STATE OF MINNESOTA PRICING PAGE - Price quote for: COLLECTION BASIN / JET RODDER TRUCK 1 of 6 Vendor Name MacQueen Equipment Inc. Contact Person Bill McCarthy / Mike Purdy Street Address 1125 7th ST E Saint Paul MN. 55106 PO Box Vendor Name MacQueen Equipment Inc. City. State, zip 1125 7th ST E Saint Paul MN. 55106 Phone # 651-645-5726 Toll Free # 800-832-6417 Fax # 651-645-6668 Email Address ll.mccarthy@macqueengroup.com / mike.purdy@macqueengroup.cor Make & Model Vactor 2100 Plus MINNESOTA STATE CONTRACT #139819, RELEASE # W-196(5) Spec # Description Qty Price Subtotal 1.0 Price for base unit: 1 $ 237,665.00 I $ 237,665.00 * Base Unit Meets MN Dot Weight Requirements 2.0 Debris bodv options Option Ideas listed below, add or delete as needed 2.1 10 cubic yd. debris body $ - I $ - 2.2 12 cubic yd. debris body 1 $ 6,624.00 $ 6,624.00 2.3 15 cubic yd. debris body $ 15,234.00 $ - 2.4 Automatic debris body washout system Standard 1 $ - $ - 2.5 5 Cubic Yd. Debris PD Blower, 824 15" $ 7,897.00 $ - 2.6 10 Cubic Yd. Debris PD Blower, 824 15" $ 7,897.00 $ - 2.7 12 Cubic Yd. Debris PD Blower, 824 15" 1 $ 16,230.00 $ 16,230.00 2.8 15 Cubic Yd. Debris PD Blower, 824 15" $ 21,687.00 $ - 2.9 Flat Rear Door with Hydraulic Locks Standard 1 $ - $ - 2.10 6" Rear Door Butterfly Valve, 3:00 $ 806.00 $ - 2.11 6" Rear Door Butterfly Valve, 6:00, Port/Fixed Screen $ 1,039.00 $ - 2. 12 6" Rear Door Knife Valve Camlock, 3:00 1 $ 1,209.00 $ 1,209.00 2.13 6" Rear Door Knife Valve Camlock, 6:00, Port Fixed Screen 1 $ 1,443.00 $ 1,443.00 2.14 6" Rear Door Knife Valve Camlock, Air Actuated, Port/Fixed Screen $ 2,074.00 $ - 2.15 6" Decant / Knife Valve, Curbside / Street Side $ 2,270.00 $ - 2.16 Trash Pump / Screen / Floating Arm External $ 11,456.00 $ - 2.17 Internal Body Screens & Pump Off Ports Only $ 677.00 $ - 2.18 Pump Off Plumbing to Outlet Location dependent on supplied chassis $ 2,912.00 $ - 2. 19 Standpipe & Screen for 6:00 Port $ 1,018.00 $ - 2.20 Additional Water, Water & Debris Tank Joined $ 2,364.00 $ - 2.21 Full Door Swinging Screen $ 771.00 $ - PRICING FOR BASIN -JET RODDER Spec # 2.22 2.23 2.24 2.25 2.26 2.27 2.28 2.29 2.30 2.31 2.32 2.33 2.34 2.35 2.36 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 3.9 3.10 3.11 3.12 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6 STATE OF MINNESOTA PRICING PAGE - 2 of 6 MINNESOTA STATE CONTRACT #139819, RELEASE # W-196(5) Description Qty Price Subtotal Folding Pipe Rack - Each (CURBSIDE/STREETSIDE) Hydraulic Folding Pipe Rack Rear Door Splash Shield Lube Manifold Debris Load Limit Alarm tied to Vacuum Relief Electronic Digital Scales Tied to Vacuum Relief Body Up Alarm 60" High Dump (Available on 12 and 15 Yd. Debris Bodies with 1300 and 1500 Gallon of Water) Standard Dual Stainless Steel Ball Float Shut Off Standard Upgrade to Stainless Steel Ball Cage Debris Deflector Plate Standard 1 - Camera System - Rear Standard 2 - Camera System - Front and Rear 4 - Camera System - Front, Rear, Both Sides Hydraulic Tank Shut Off Valves Standard Vacuum system options Option Ideas listed below, add or delete as needed Vertical Cyclonic Separator (4 Cyclones) Vertical Cyclonic Separator (4 Cyclones) 304 Stainless Steel Cyclonic Separator Washout System Fan Flush out System Front Blower Engagement Blower High Temp Safety Shutdown Single Engine Fan, Dual Stage Roots 824 RCS/16" PD Blower Roots 824 RCS/18" PD Blower Roots 1024 PD/18" 12 Yrd Debris Roots 1024 PD/18" 15 Yrd Debris Air vacuum breaker system Standard Boom options Option Ideas listed below, add or delete as needed 8' Extendable Boom, 180 Degree Rotation Standard 10' Telescoping Boom, 180 Degree Rotation 5 x 5 Extendable / Telescoping Boom, 180 Degree Rotation 10' x 15' Extendable / Telescopic Boom 180 Degree Rotation 10' Telescoping Boom Elbow, Hard Hat Style 10' Telescoping Boom Elbow, Ceramic Lined 2 $ 1,020.00 $ 2,040.00 $ 1,925.00 $ - 1 $ 1,498.00 1,498.00 1 $ 2,224.00 2,224.00 1 $ 2,026.00 2,026.00 $ 12,566.00 - $ 889.00 - 1 $ - $ - $ 556.00 - 1 $ - $ - 1 $ 622.00 622.00 $ 1,120.00 - $ 5,599.00 $ - $ 8,080.00 1 $ - 1 $ 18,779.00 1 $ 18,779.00 $ 456.00 $ - $ 1,060.00 - PRICING FOR BASIN -JET RODDER $ 5,146.00 $ - 1 $ 6,638.00 $ 6,638.00 $ 485.00 - $ 499.00 - 1 $ 4,902.00 4,902.00 1 $ 520.00 520.00 $ 17,708.00 - $ 2,733.00 - 1 $ 8,995.00 8,995.00 $ 28,429.00 - $ 29,643.00 - 1 $ - $ - $ 5,599.00 $ - $ 8,080.00 1 $ - 1 $ 18,779.00 1 $ 18,779.00 $ 456.00 $ - $ 1,060.00 - PRICING FOR BASIN -JET RODDER 6.0 6.1 STATE OF MINNESOTA 6.2 3 of 6 6.3 PRICING PAGE - 6.4 1" x 700' Sewer Hose 2500 PSI 6.5 MINNESOTA STATE CONTRACT #139819, RELEASE # W-196(5) Spec # Description Qty Hand Gun with lay down hose Standard Price Subtotal 4.7 Water Ring Assembly, At Hose End or Debris Inlet Handgun Coupler - Midship Standard $ 804.00 $ - 4.8 Boom Storage Post Standard 1 $ - $ - 4.9 Front Joystick Control Standard 1 $ - $ - 4.10 Belly Pack Wireless Controls w/ Hose Reel Functions 1 $ 3,031.00 $ 3,031.00 5.0 Pump oations Option Ideas listed below, add or delete as needed 5.1 80 GPM / 2500 PSI Water Pump Standard 1 $ - $ - 5.2 70 GPM / 3000 PSI Water Pump Standard $ - $ - 5.3 100 GPM / 2000 PSI Water Pump / Includes 1-1/4 x 500' Hose $ 3,896.00 $ - 5.4 Jet Rodder Accumulator On/Off Manual Control Valve Standard 1 $ - $ - 5.5 Jet Rodder Accumulator On/Off Front Reel Control Valve $ 792.00 $ - 5.6 Additional Accumulator for low pressure control $ 2,630.00 $ - 5.7 Rodder Pump Drain Valves Standard 1 $ - $ - 5.8 Chassis Engine Cooling Package (Big Block Engines) $ 3,370.00 $ - 5.9 3" Y -Strainer @ Pump w/ 3" Drain Valve Standard 1 $ - $ - 5.10 Hydro Excavation Kit w/ 50' Hose & Nozzle 1 $ 3,402.00 $ 3,402.00 5.11 Water Heater 400,000 BTU's - May Limit Water $ 13,208.00 $ - 5.12 Water Heater 800,000 BTU's 12V - May Limit Water $ 17,149.00 $ - 5.13 Stainless Steel Water Barrel $ 3,068.00 I $ - 6.0 6.1 Hose reel options Option Ideas listed below, add or delete as needed Telescoping Rotational Reel, Hydraulic Extending 15", 1" x 800' Capacity Standard 6.2 Larger Capacity Hose Reel, 1" x 1000' Capacity 6.3 1" x 600' Sewer Hose 2500 PSI Standard 6.4 1" x 700' Sewer Hose 2500 PSI 6.5 1" x 800' Sewer Hose 2500 PSI 6.6 Auto Level Wind Guide, Indexing 6.7 Hand Gun with lay down hose Standard 6.8 Hand Gun Hose Reel w/ Spring Retract 6.9 Handgun Coupler - Midship Standard 6.10 Handgun Couplers Front/Rear 6.11 Lateral Cleaning 150' Hose - 25GPM/2000PS1 6.12 Intelliview Safety System, Hose Reel Standard 6.13 Hydraulic Oil Temp Alarm 6.14 Tachometer/Chassis Engine w/ Hour Meter Standard 6.15 Water Pump Hour Meter Standard 6.16 Digital Hose Footage Counter Standard PRICING FOR BASIN -JET RODDER 5,105.00 1,279.00 602.00 Spec # 6.17 7.0 7.1 7.2 7.3 7.4 7.5 7.6 7.7 7.8 7.9 7.10 7.11 7.12 7.13 7.14 7.15 7.16 7.17 7.18 8.0 8.1 8.2 8.3 8.4 8.5 8.6 8.7 8.8 8.9 8.10 STATE OF MINNESOTA PRICING PAGE - 4of6 MINNESOTA STATE CONTRACT #139819, RELEASE # W-196(5) Description Qty Price Subtotal Digital PSI Gauge Standard Water system options Option Ideas listed below, add or delete as needed Different Size Tank - 1120 Gallon - 10 & 12 Yrd Body Different Size Tank - 1300 Gallon - 10 & 12 Yrd Body Different Size Tank - 1300 Gallon - 15 Yrd Body Standard Different Size Tank - 1500 Gallon - 10 & 12 Yrd Body Different Size Tank - 1500 Gallon - 15 Yrd Debris Body Air Purge Continuous Water Tank Fill Digital Water Level Indicator Low Water Light / Alarm / Additional Water Tank Fill Water Filtration Recycle System Stainless Steel Water Tanks Standard Aluminum Water Tanks In Lieu of Stainless Cold Weather Package Insulated Wrapped Water Lines Heat Traced Wrapped Water Lines Heated Water Pump Cabinet Heated Handgun Pump Cabinet Tool box option add or delete as needed Curbside Toolbox 48W x 22H x 24D Standard Curb Side Chassis Frame, 30W x 25H x 24D Front Bumper Mounted 16W x 12H x 18D / LED Markers Behind Cab, Partial 17W x 30H x 48D Behind Cab 16W x 30H x 96D Tool Tray, Behind Cab Long Handle Tool Storage Street Side Chassis Frame, 60W x 24H x 24D Street Side Subframe, 18W x 24H x 24D Street Side Subframe, 16W x 20H x 24D 9.0 Other options $ - Option Ideas listed below, add or delete as needed 9.1 8" x 3' aluminum pipe assembly 9.2 8" x 5' aluminum pipe assembly 9.3 8" x 7.5' aluminum pipe assembly 9.4 8" x 6.5' catch basin nozzle assembly 1 $ 2,912.00 $ - 1 $ 2,611.00 $ 2,611.00 $ - $ $ 2,477.00 - 1 $ 3,912.00 $ - $ 700.00 - $ 1,306.00 $ - $ 1,272.00 - $ 1,317.00 - $ 1,742.00 - 1 $ 672.00 672.00 $ 633.00 - $ 728.00 - $ 114,750.00 - 1 $ - $ - $ 2,800.00 - $ 3,910.00 - $ 4,849.00 - $ 12,885.00 - $ 6,961.00 - 1 $ - 1$ - 168.00$ - $ 1,721.00 - $ $ 1,956.00 $ - $ $ 2,477.00 - 1 $ 3,177.00 3,177.00 251.00 - $ 700.00 - $ 334.00 - $ 2,594.00 - $ 1,317.00 - $ 1,317.00 - PRICING FOR BASIN -JET RODDER $ 168.00$ - $ 219.00 - $ 306.00 - $ 251.00 - PRICING FOR BASIN -JET RODDER Spec # 9.5 9.6 9.7 9.8 9.9 9.10 9.11 9.12 9.13 9.14 9.15 9.16 9.17 9.18 9.19 9.20 9.21 9.22 9.23 9.24 9.25 9.26 9.27 9.28 9.29 9.30 9.31 9.32 9.33 9.34 9.35 9.36 4910 STATE OF MINNESOTA 5 of 6 PRICING PAGE - MINNESOTA STATE CONTRACT #139819, RELEASE # W-196(5) Description Qty Price Subtotal Pick up tube clamps $ LED Lights - Clearance, Backup - Stop/Turn/Tail STD 1 $ LED Strobe Light with Guard on Cab Guard (Each) $ DOT 3 Lighting Package - 4 FS Strobe LED (8020PF) $ DOT 3 Lighting Package - 5 FS Strobe LED (8020PG) $ DOT 3 Lighting Package - 6 FS Strobe LED (8020PE) 1 $ DOT 3 Lighting Package - 4 Whelen Strobe (8020P) $ DOT 3 Lighting Package - 6 Whelen Strobe (8020PA) $ Rear Bumper Strobes, (2) 6" FS Strobes $ Whelen Arrow Board Lighting Package $ LED Mid -Ship Turn Signals $ Worlights (2), LED, Boom (Ext., Tele., 5x5) $ Worklight, LED, Rear Door, Op. Station, Reel / Per $ Worklight, LED, Curbside, Street Side / Per $ Hand Light w/ Bumper Plug $ Hand Light w/ Retractable Reel $ Hand Light, LED Wireless Spot Light 12V Rechargable Rear Directional Control, Split Arrow LED, 10 Lights $ $ Rear Directional Control, Arrow Board, 10 Lights 1 $ Rear Directional Control, LED Arrow Stick, 8 Lights $ VactorTRAK - Remote Information Monitoring System $ VactorTRAK - Subscription (1 year) $ Sonetics Noise Reduction APX377 - Full Duplex / Each $ Sonetics Noise Reduction APX379 - Full Duplex Bluetooth / Each $ SON 150 - Stand Alone Truck Mount Per 5 User Hub $ COMHUB - SCH305A 5 User $ COMHUB - SCH310A 10 User $ SON-CC5 5 user Charging Case $ SON-CC10 10 user Charging Case $ Safety Cone Storage/drop in or post (one Standard) $ 2019 Freightliner 114SD, 370HP, Auto, Single Axle $ 2019 Freightliner 114SD, 370HP, Auto, Tandem Axle 1 $ 2019 Freightliner 114SD, 435HP, Auto, Tandem Axle $ PRICING FOR BASIN -JET RODDER 28.00 1 $ - 1$ 1,040.00 $ 1,326.00 I $ 2,136.00 I $ 3,260.00 I $ 5,167.00 I $ 5,415.00 I $ 1,255.00 $ 6,440.00 $ 538.00 $ 773.00 $ 650.00 I $ 487.00 $ 355.00 $ 534.00 $ 340.00 I $ 1,530.00 I $ 1,337.00 $ 1,962.00 I $ 6,370.00 I $ 2,496.00 $ 959.00 I $ 1,174.00 I $ 1,329.00 I $ 2,518.00 $ 3,486.00 $ 1,358.00 $ 1,507.00 $ 155.00 I $ 98,855.00 $ 106,399.00 I $ 120,160.00 I $ 3,260.00 1,337.00 106,399.00 STATE OF MINNESOTA 6 of 6 PRICING PAGE - MINNESOTA STATE CONTRACT #139819, RELEASE # W-196(5) Spec # Description Qty Price Subtotal 9.38 2019 Kenworth T440, 370HP, Auto, Single $ 96,129.00 $ - 9.39 2019 Kenworth T440, 370HP, Auto, Tandem $ 106,013.00 $ - 9.40 2018 Kenworth T440, 425HP, Auto, Tandem $ 125,842.00 $ - 9.41 2018 International 7500, 370HP, Auto, Single $ 95,270.00 $ - 9.42 2018 International 7500, 370HP, Auto, Tandem $ 101,359.00 $ - 9.43 2018 International 7600, 430HP, Auto, Tandem $ 121,365.00 $ - 9.44 2018 Peterbilt 348, 370HP, Auto Single $ 97,216.00 $ - 9.45 2018 Peterbilt 348, 370HP, Auto Tandem $ 102,664.00 $ - 10.0 Performance options add or delete as needed 10.1 Extended warranties $ - �$ _ �$ _ �$ _ �$ _ 11.0 Price Per Loaded Mile See Special Terms and conditions NO FLAT RATE ALLOWED DELIVERY STARTING POINT - City, State, Zip and price per mile 11.1 Saint Paul, MN 55106 $ 5.50 $ - 12.0 Equipment Inspection and Repair 12.1 Rate For Initial Inspection $ 125.40 $ - 12.2 Rate for Mechanical Work $ 125.40 $ - 13.0 New Equipment Rental Program 13.1 Monthly Rental for 2100 Plus $ 15,620.00 $ - 13.2 Monthly Rental for 2100 Plus Recycler $ 18,900.00 $ - 13.3 Weekly Rental Rate $ - Percent (%) of rental rate applied to Purchase Price $ - Total Cost: $ 442,290.00 PRICING FOR BASIN -JET RODDER City Council Agenda: 9/24/2018 2I. Consideration of chanting the Public Works Business Hours (ML/JO) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The various departments within public works currently work varying hours. The parks and street departments currently work from 7:00 am to 3:30 pm and the water and sewer department works from 7:30 am to 4:00 pm and the office at public works is currently open from 7:30 am to 4:00 pm. A majority of the walk-in traffic that we see at public works is from contractors who are picking up water meters to install. The department also receives several inquiries about the cemetery, compost facility, as well as to report issues they may have noticed within the city. Since most contractors start working around 7:00 we feel that by being open earlier will provide better service to them and will keep all of the departments within public works on the same schedules which will make it easier to share resources between departments if necessary. Public works telephone calls will be answered until 4:30 pm at city hall and public works issues can also be answered at city hall until 4:30 pm as well. Al. Budget Impact: NA A2. Staff Workload Impact: NA B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the modification of the Public Works Business Hours to 7:00am to 3:30pm. 2. Motion to deny the modification of the Public Works Business Hours. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: • Staff recommends Alternate No. 1 D. ATTACHMENTS: • None. City Council Agenda — 9/24/2018 2J. Consideration to accept final design selections, authorize award vavment, accept quotes and award banner preparation for the 2018 banner proiect on Walnut/Broadway/Pine. (AS/JaT/TM/TP) A. REFERENCE & BACKGROUND Banner Design The City Council is asked to review and accept the final banner designs selected by the Banner Creative Committee and the community for streetlight banner replacement along select corridors in Downtown Monticello. Four banner designs will be placed along TH25 (Pine Street) from 7th Street to River Street and along Broadway east of Pine Street. Designs for a logo banner, General Monticello banner, Winter banner and Riverfest banner have been created. The designs for the General, Winter and Riverfest designs were submitted by artists in a Banner Design Contest. A Banner Creative Committee representing a variety of local groups selected the finalists in the General, Riverfest, and Winter categories. Then the community was invited to vote for their favorite designs at the August 28 Creative City Celebration. Over 150 votes were cast for the selected designs at the celebration, and the winning designs in each category are included as supporting data. The City of Monticello logo banner was prepared by city staff. The City of Monticello logo banner will remain up year-round and will be staggered with the other three designs intended to change seasonally. The winter banner will be placed from November -March, the Riverfest banner placed from May -end of July, and the general banner will be up the balance of the year. Every other banner along the corridor will be the logo banner year-round. In the Downtown, six different designs and the logo banner will be placed along the Walnut Street corridor and along Broadway west of Pine Street. These six designs will be up throughout the full year, staggered with the logo banner. These designs were also submitted through the banner art contest. The Banner Creative Committee recommended that, given Walnut and Broadway's walkability and the Downtown Small Area Plan's goal of shifting the center of downtown to Walnut & Broadway, the corridor could benefit from a variety of artistic designs that are different from that along Pine Street. It would call attention to the area and encourage further exploration of the downtown. The Banner Contest included a $200 stipend prize to all artists who submitted winning artwork. Based on the designs selected, there are 9 total art submittals, for a total of $1,800 in stipend/prize payments. The winners are listed on the banner designs in the packet. Council is asked to authorize the payment to each artist as part of this item consideration. Funding for the prizes is coming from the Parks Department budget and is part of the Arts Initiative's work. City Council Agenda — 9/24/2018 Banner Ouotes The City received three written quotes in response to a request for quotes on the banner project. The quotes are included for reference, along with a summary table. The summary table provides information on differing scenarios based on the quality of fabric used. The table provides unit price comparisons to more easily compare costs for banners and brackets based on actual number of banners needed by design. Staff is recommending that the City proceed with awarding the project to Main Street Designs, Inc. Main Street Designs has provided the lowest cost per unit for the desired project. As the supplier of the City's current streetlight banners, Main Street brackets are already in place along the corridors, which requires less cost investment. If the City uses either of the other two providers, new brackets for all banner locations will be required. With Main Street, only replacement of broken or missing brackets is required. The replacement banners will be the same size as they are currently along the corridors. The Street Superintendent also recommends using canvas material versus vinyl material for durability and maintenance purposes. The existing banners are canvas and have held up extremely well. Main Street Designs offers a 3 -year warranty on the banners and 8 -year warranty on the brackets. Staff has also verified that design and delivery is included in the cost. Council will note that in order to transfer the artwork to digital print quality, some additional cost for conversion of art to digital format is anticipated. Staff would expect these costs not to exceed $1000. The total cost for the banner project based on the Main Street Designs, Inc quote is $13,575. The total budget for this project is $30,000. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS 1. Motion to accept final banner design selections, authorize award payment to 8 individuals totaling $1800, and to accept quotes and award banner preparation for the 2018 banner project on Walnut/Broadway/Pine to Main Street Designs, Inc at an estimated cost of $13,575, plus costs for artwork conversion. 2. Motion to deny acceptance of final design selections, and deny authorization of award payment, and deny acceptance of quotes and banner preparation award for the 2018 banner project on Walnut/Broadway/Pine 3. Motion of other. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff and the Banner Committee recommends alternative #1 above. The Banner Contest yielded wonderful artwork which was vetted by a representative committee and ultimately viewed and selected by the community. In regard to the banner quote and project award, staff recommends awarding the contract for the banner preparation to Main Street Designs, Inc. Main Street has provided the lowest quote overall for canvas banners and has a proven track record with the City of customer service and quality. City Council Agenda — 9/24/2018 Council will note that the final amount paid to Main Street may vary slightly based on final quantity of brackets and print design work. D. SUPPORTING DATA A. Final Recommended Banner Designs B. Banner Locations Map C. Received Quotes D. Quote Summary and Recommendation E. Banner Contest Info GENERAL CITY BANNER - TH 25 (to be staggered with art banner year round) GENERAL WINNER0 : GOHMAN (to be staggered with city banner on TH 25) 4r� L6 -ti (Apr - May & August - Oct) Arf MAN s ni f 4 dk If i low oAM"WIC2L W Tm � q _ A snow kill 4 vc--- di - �y -w 106 For ov ao! es I /a, lof �I w� PVT 4 10A i 4 AWL A6.. Joe v R 0 RIVERFEST WINNER: GOHMAN (to be staggered with city banner on TH 25) (June - July) • -1 Ej 0 0 9 0 11 r 0 6 0 6 a 0 POW jO6 !100" VNIMP 'P44M 4Pj*%§OW.p i t ar Ash. ALM 0 A ft 0 0 r �+ 0 WINTER/HOLIDAY WINNER:0 LOCKHART (to be staggered with city banner on TH 25) (NOVEMBER - • • MARCH) OF 61 Ic- ,pool —_ OF 61 Ic- DT ART WINNER,0 BECKER (to be staggered with other art winners on Walnut & Broadway) 11 k r n , r -Irl. 1 f y r 4 I 1 it Fjq I I� IN F a 4F rf � r 1 1 r � 0 TART WINNER: BRAKOB to be staggered with othe 7 r art winners on Walnut & Broadway) m� M I IRLEN E - M 0 9 J ME= ■ ME Y . MM Z m 'r Ar r■ I ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ Mr ■ 7 7 � 1% 7 ■ I& 14 ■ 0 DT ART WINNER 0 BRAKOB (to be staggered with other art winners on Walnut & Broadway) ■ MEMPE"Op, -m ■ r-' ■ ■ ON ■ OF MEN MEMPE"Op, -m ■ r-' ■ ■ ON ■ OF DT ART WINNER: BRAKOB (to be staggered with other art winners on Walnut & Broadway) rLW Am I 4 44 -4. • • _tel Mir- -I r - � 7 L)T ART WIP o be staggered with other z �l FIE ME1 "e = 1 u ON W- I ■C D 1 ZINONS .■. W _Vm ME - ti-. ME FL J%6 IL11 _7 T .m i UN it & Broadw2 OR *iesar. 1 altzle. 0* 0IIiI:1we DSD - =7 J R ON (alnut & Broadw2 DOWNTOWN BANNER LOCATIONS t 01 Mp � a f 10 { 'O-. — g '"Le end Railroad Tracks Pathways Sidewalks Future Pathways Banners Future Banners CITY OF Monticello Mainstreet Designs, Inc. 860 Downs Road Champlin, MN 55316 Sales Quote Sold To City of Monticello Jacob Thunander / Community Economic Development Assistant 505 Walnut Street Suite # 1 Monticello, MN 55362 Quote Date: September 13, 2018 Ship By: Must have By: ASAP Part Number I Quantity Rich Dappen 800-755-3039 QUOTE NUMBER 1 VN Digital - Standard 18oz. Ship To City of Monticello Jacob Thunander / Community Economic Development Assistant 505 Walnut Street Suite # 1 Monticello, MN 55362 Customer Purchase Orderl P.O.# NA Terms) Freight Charges) Prepay and add to invoi Unit Price I Tot Vinyl ce Tota $12,445.00 Delivered $0.00 $12,445.00 zv v z z0 v ,VCS t `" O O O O fO m �4rd z z z z rn 0 r m imo� 1i:IT: f. r 3 �.U�fi; flil'�: flit OifliY Ofv pc �C'lIIYMonticello ollsoi3noM Monticello Monticello Monticello ticello Monticello Monticello Monticello 17'/2" x 47" Digital - Standard 18oz. Vinyl Custom D -Vinyl 15 17'/2' x 47" Custom Digital 18oz.Vinyl Monticello "City Logo" $46.00 $690.00 Custom D -Vinyl 10 17'/2' x 47" Custom Digital 18oz.Vinyl "General Monticello" $46.00 $460.00 Custom D -Vinyl 10 17'/2' x 47" Custom Digital 18oz.Vinyl Monticello "Riverfest" $46.00 $460.00 Custom D -Vinyl 10 17'/2' x 47" Custom Digital 18oz.Vinyl Monticello "Winter" $46.00 $460.00 Custom D -Vinyl 15 17'/2' x 47" Custom Digital 18oz.Vinyl Monticello "Downtown A" $46.00 $690.00 Custom D -Vinyl 15 17'/2' x 47" Custom Digital 18oz.Vinyl Monticello "Downtown B" $46.00 $690.00 Custom D -Vinyl 15 17'/2' x 47" Custom Digital 18oz.Vinyl Monticello "Downtown C" $46.00 $690.00 Custom D -Vinyl 15 17'/2' x 47" Custom Digital 18oz.Vinyl Monticello "Downtown D" $46.00 $690.00 Custom D -Vinyl 15 17'/2' x 47" Custom Digital 18oz.Vinyl Monticello "Downtown E" $46.00 $690.00 Custom D -Vinyl 15 17'/2' x 47" Custom Digital 18oz.Vinyl Monticello "Downtown F" $46.00 $690.00 FFI 35 Fiber Flex I Bracket System w/Permanent Banding,Rod Arms,Clips $53.00 $1,855.00 Sets Each Bracket System Is A Complete Kits To Hang One Banner 30" x 84" Digital - Standard 18oz. Vinyl Custom D -Vinyl 15 30" x 84" Custom Digital 18oz.Vinyl Monticello "City Logo" $75.00 $1,125.00 Custom D -Vinyl 10 30" x 84" Custom Digital 18oz.Vinyl Monti cel lo"General Monticello" $75.00 $750.00 Custom D -Vinyl 10 30" x 84" Custom Digital 18oz.Vinyl Monticello "Riverfest" $75.00 $750.00 Custom D -Vinyl 10 30" x 84" Custom Digital 18oz.Vinyl Monticello "Winter" $75.00 $750.00 FFIII Adj. 15 Fiber Flex III Adjustable Bracket System w/Permanent Banding $67.00 $1,005.00 Sets Each Bracket System Is A Complete Kits To Hang One Banner $12,445.00 Delivered $0.00 $12,445.00 zv v z z0 v ,VCS t `" O O O O fO m �4rd z z z z rn 0 r m imo� 1i:IT: f. r 3 �.U�fi; flil'�: flit OifliY Ofv pc �C'lIIYMonticello ollsoi3noM Monticello Monticello Monticello ticello Monticello Monticello Monticello Mainstreet Designs, Inc. 860 Downs Road Champlin, MN 55316 Sales Quote Sold To City of Monticello Jacob Thunander / Community Economic Development Assistant 505 Walnut Street Suite # 1 Monticello, MN 55362 Quote Date: September 13, 2018 Ship By: Must have By: ASAP Part Number I Quantity Rich Dappen 800-755-3039 QUOTE NUMBER 2 Digital - Main Street F Ship To City of Monticello Jacob Thunander / Community Economic Development Assistant 505 Walnut Street Suite # 1 Monticello, MN 55362 Customer Purchase Orderl P.O.# NA Terms) Freight Charges) Prepay and add to invoi Unit Price I Tot Fa ce Tota $16,000.00 Delivered $0.00 $16,000.00 M : G ; z G zO z "F'° ;� V'Y.y. i4. a X z z zI o Z o o _..o 0 0 ti �: x O z m - nar -T aFtr aar nrsr dxn �q(�` 4 Z 9 5 5 5.] CI!` OF -. ❑i,' (0 On Ot (lie OF Uiv 0% On Or a„ G' MQntieello Monticello off ��iiRoM Monticello Montioella Monticello MonticelloMonticello Monticello 171/2" x 47" Digital Main Street Fabric Custom D -MSF 15 17'/2' x 47" Custom Digital MSF Monticello "City Logo" $63.00 $945.00 Custom D -MSF 10 17'/2' x 47" Custom Digital MSF Monticello "General Monticello" $63.00 $630.00 Custom D -MSF 10 17'/2' x 47" Custom Digital MSF Monticello "Riverfest" $63.00 $630.00 Custom D -MSF 10 17'/2' x 47" Custom Digital MSF Monticello "Winter" $63.00 $630.00 Custom D -MSF 15 17'/2' x 47" Custom Digital MSF Monticello "Downtown A" $63.00 $945.00 Custom D -MSF 15 17'/2' x 47" Custom Digital MSF Monticello "Downtown B" $63.00 $945.00 Custom D -MSF 15 17'/2' x 47" Custom Digital MSF Monticello "Downtown C' $63.00 $945.00 Custom D -MSF 15 17'/2' x 47" Custom Digital MSF Monticello "Downtown D" $63.00 $945.00 Custom D -MSF 15 17'/2' x 47" Custom Digital MSF Monticello "Downtown E" $63.00 $945.00 Custom D -MSF 15 17'/2' x 47" Custom Digital MSF Monticello "Downtown F" $63.00 $945.00 FFI 35 Fiber Flex I Bracket System w/Permanent Banding,Rod Arms,Clips $53.00 $1,855.00 Sets Each Bracket System Is A Complete Kits To Hang One Banner 30" x 84" Digital Main Street Fabric Custom D -MSF 15 30" x 84" Custom Digital MSF Monticello "City Logo" $103.00 $1,545.00 Custom D -MSF 10 30" x 84" Custom Digital MSF Monticello "General Monticello" $103.00 $1,030.00 Custom D -MSF 10 30" x 84" Custom Digital MSF Monticello "Riverfest" $103.00 $1,030.00 Custom D -MSF 10 30" x 84" Custom Digital MSF Monticello "Winter" $103.00 $1,030.00 FFIII Adj. 15 Fiber Flex III Adjustable Bracket System w/Permanent Banding $67.00 $1,005.00 Sets Each Bracket System Is A Complete Kits To Hang One Banner $16,000.00 Delivered $0.00 $16,000.00 M : G ; z G zO z "F'° ;� V'Y.y. i4. a X z z zI o Z o o _..o 0 0 ti �: x O z m - nar -T aFtr aar nrsr dxn �q(�` 4 Z 9 5 5 5.] CI!` OF -. ❑i,' (0 On Ot (lie OF Uiv 0% On Or a„ G' MQntieello Monticello off ��iiRoM Monticello Montioella Monticello MonticelloMonticello Monticello i� GRA) SHOPPE 3240 Mike Collins Drive Eagan, MN 55121 888-683-9665 Toll free 651-683-9740 Fax Bill To Ship To Monticello City of (MN) Jacob Thunander Community and Economic Development jacob.thunander@ci.monticello.mn.us Terms Est. Delivery from art approval Rep Net 30 2 weeks Dani Qty Description :......................:...................................................................................................................................................................... :....... 135::17.5" W x 47" H (Finished size including pockets) 18oz. Outdoor Vinyl Street Pole Banners. -Digitally printed on both sides with UV resistant Inks. Unlimited colors. -3" Double Stitched and Lined Rod Pockets with Grommets in each corner. a. City Logo: 15 b. General Monticello: 10 c. Riverfest: 10 d. Winter: 10 e. Downtown (6 Designs): (15 of each design) = 90 45:: 30" W x 84" H (Finished size including pockets) 18oz. Outdoor Vinyl Street Pole Banners. -Digitally printed on both sides with UV resistant Inks. Unlimited colors. € -3" Double Stitched and Lined Rod Pockets with Grommets in each corner. a. City Logo: 15 b. General Monticello: 10 c. Riverfest: 10 d. Winter: 10 1 Design Set Up Fee This estimate is based on plans and specifications provided at the time the estimate was given. Changes requested by the customer may cause a change in the quoted price. Freight will be added to the invoice unless other arrangements are made. This quote is valid for 30 days. Authorization Signature and Date 1►1 Page 1 Quotation Date Estimate # 9/13/2018 11465 Project Name Street Pole Banners Price Total ........................:...............................................: 26.00: 3,510.00T Subtotal 52.00: 2,340.00T 345.00: 345.00T Sales Tax (7.125%) Total i� GRA) SHOPPE 3240 Mike Collins Drive Eagan, MN 55121 888-683-9665 Toll free 651-683-9740 Fax Bill To Ship To Monticello City of (MN) Jacob Thunander Community and Economic Development jacob.thunander@ci.monticello.mn.us Terms Est. Delivery from art approval Rep Net 30 2 weeks Dani Qty Description :............................................................................................................................................................................................:........ 35 WindPro Storm Banner Bracket Sets for 17.5" Banners € This package includes: • (2) Aluminum brackets • (2) White fiberglass arms - 20.5" Long • (2) End caps • (2) Tie wraps • (2) Pins & rings • (4) 40" stainless steel bands 15 WindPro Hurricane Banner Bracket Sets for 30" Banners This package includes: • (2) cast aluminum base plates • (2) 30" arms featuring fiberglass rods • (2) end caps • (2) tie wraps • (4) 9/16" screw gear bands 40" Estimated Shipping FedEx Ground TBD This estimate is based on plans and specifications provided at the time the estimate was given. Changes requested by the customer may cause a change in the quoted price. Freight will be added to the invoice unless other arrangements are made. This quote is valid for 30 days. Authorization Signature and Date X Page 2 Quotation Date Estimate # 9/13/2018 11465 Project Name Street Pole Banners Price Total ........................:...............................................: 39.00: 1,365.00T Subtotal 58.00: 870.00T Sales Tax (7.125%) Total $8,430.00 $600.64 $9,030.64 Monticello, MN RFQ - Banners 9.17.2018 Banners: Item - Digital print on heavy duty 22 oz vinyl 17.5" x 47" digital print on 22 oz heavy duty vinyl 30" x 84" digital print on 22 oz heavy duty vinyl TOTAL for digital print on vinyl Per Qty Total $21.55 135 $2,909.25 $64.00 45 $2,880.00 $5,789.25 Digital print on vinyl Page 1 of 4 Item - Digital print on poly canvas fabric 17.5" x 47" digital print on poly canvas fabric 30" x 84" digital print on poly canvas fabric TOTAL for digital print on poly canvas fabric Per Qty Total $56.00 135 $7,560 $95.00 45 $4,275 $11,835 -1V r Digital print on poly canvas • Printed with UV resistant inks • Includes multiple images • 3 year warranty on vinyl banners • 4 year warranty on digital on poly canvas Page 2 of 4 Brackets Item Per Qty Total Slimline bracket set for small banner $36 35 $1,260 Sets of (2) replacement arms $36 18 $ 648 Total for Slimline sets and replacement $1,908 Item Per Qty Total TITAN banner bracket set $90 15 $1,350 Replacement rods $65 15 $ 975 Total for TITAN bracket sets and replacements $2,325 i Page 3 of 4 Tk j*• I I .-�u Item Per Qty Total BannserSaver spring loaded brackets $159 15 $2,385 Replacement rods $ 18 15 $ 270 Total for BannerSaver bracket sets & replacements $2,655 Wh Shipping: Add shipping of $368 to your choice of banner materials and bracket choices Northern Lights Display Kristina Kullberg 13982 Industry Ave Becker, MN 55308 877-974-3205 www.northernIightsdisplay.com kkullberg@northernlightsdisplay.com Size I Location lQuantity JUnit Price ITOTAL Estimate Banners I Bracket Quantity jUnit Price ITOTAL Estimate Brackets I Design lWarranty IShipping Main Street Vinyl 171/2"x47" Walnut/West Broadway/East Broadway 30" x 84" Pine Marine canvas 17 1/2" x 47" Walnut/West Broadway/East Broadway 30" x 84" Pine Grafix Vinyl 171/2"x47" Walnut/West Broadway/East Broadway 30" x 84" Pine Northern Lights Vinyl 171/2"x47" Walnut/West Broadway/East Broadway 30" x 84" Pine Marine canvas 17 1/2" x 47" Walnut/West Broadway/East Broadway 30" x 84" Pine 110 $ 46.00 $ 40 $ 75.00 $ 110 $ 63.00 $ 40 $ 103.00 $ 110 $ 26.00 $ 40 $ 52.00 $ 5,060.00 35 $ 53.00 $ 3,000.00 10 $ 67.00 $ 6,930.00 2,560.00 15 $ 90.00 $ 1,350.00 Same as above 4,120.00 $ 6,160.00 4 years 2,860.00 65 $ 39.00 $ 2,080.00 15 $ 58.00 $ 1,855.00 670.00 $ 345.00 2,535.00 870.00 Not included 3 years banner/8 years brackets 3 years banner/8 years brackets 110 $ 21.55 $ 2,370.50 65 $ 36.00 $ 2,340.00 3 years 40 $ 64.00 $ 2,560.00 15 $ 90.00 $ 1,350.00 110 $ 56.00 $ 6,160.00 4 years Graffix vinyl $ 5,395.00 small banners Same as above 40 $ 95.00 $ 3,800.00 Other Specifications ALL QUOTED DIGITAL PRINTING Walnut/West Broadway: Small banners, 54 total banners/7 designs: 10 of each design = 70 banners Pine: Large banners, 13 total banners/4 designs: 10 of each design = 40 banners East Broadway: Small banners, 11 total banners/ 4 designs: 10 of each design = 40 banners Scenario 1 All vinyl Main Street $ 10,585.00 Graffix $ 8,345.00 Northern $ 8,620.50 Scenario 2 Small vinyl & Large Canvas Main Street $ 11,705.00 Graffix vinyl $ 5,395.00 small banners Main Street canvas $4,790 large banners $ 10,185.00 total Northern Lights canvas $5,150 large banners $ 10,545.00 total Northern $ 9,860.50 Scenario 3 - RECOMMENDED All canvas Main Street $ 13,575.00 Northern $ 13,650.00 Not included $ 368.00 CITY OF MontiAo Street Banner Competition Have your artwork showcased on the street banners located on light poles throughout Monticello! In an effort to update existing banners and make the downtown area a vibrant space where people enjoy spending time and being active, the City of Monticello is seeking local artists to participate in a banner competition. MEDIUM We are accepting all 2-dimensional mediums which can be created through, but not limited to: photography, painting, collage, mixed media, digital art or illustration. There will be two sizes of banners including: 30" x 58" and 17 %" x 30 %". The template is available for download on our website at www.ci.monticello.mn.us/banners REQUIREMENTS The contest is open to all participants of all ages. If under the age of 18, a parent or guardian will be required to sign a release form. Current artwork is encouraged, but we will accept work produced within the last 5 years. Design must be submitted by the original participant or you may work with a team to design a collaborative production. Do not submit a design that was not created by you or your team. Your submission of the photo or design and entry form is your guarantee that you are the author, sole owner, and copyright holder of the design. Photos must be unpublished. Banner designs should reflect Monticello as a place and illustrate the themes for each banner style: • General Monticello • Riverfest • Winter/Holiday • Downtown Artists are encouraged to submit designs for one or all of the different banner styles, but can only submit one design per style. A completed entry form must be completed and submitted per submission. IMAGES Images must be supplied digitally and of the highest quality reproduction. Submit one high-resolution image in TIFF or JPG file format. 1 It is suggested to choose a design which is bold and legible. Avoid busy images or those that would not come across well from a distance. ENTRY DEADLINE Entries can be submitted from May 30 to July 10, 2018. Any late submissions cannot be considered. ENTRY SUBMISSION Email the completed entry form and design to info@ci.monticello.mn.us or submit on a flash drive to: City of Monticello Attn: Community Development Department 505 Walnut Street Monticello, MN 55362 JUDGING AND WINNING ENTRIES Banner finalists will be chosen by a volunteer arts committee, City Council, and city staff. Consideration for selection includes composition, authenticity of design representing Monticello, representation of banner style theme, aesthetic impact, appropriateness of design, and legibility. Final banner designs to be selected by community at large and/or City Council at the council's discretion. Each selected and approved design will be awarded $200. DISPLAY AT RIVERFEST AND COMMUNITY EVENTS Reduced size poster reproductions of the winning banners will be displayed during Riverfest on July 12-15. Banners may also be displayed at public facilities or other community events. PROMOTION Promotion will be determined by the City of Monticello. A variety of promotions wil be ongoing throughout the competition and may include, but are not limited to: a page on the city's website, email, and Facebook. Promotions may include featured artists/bios, photos of design, and finished banners. DISCLAIMERS The City of Monticello reserves the right to disqualify or not select any entry. When you submit the design to the City of Monticello, you are waiving your rights for the use of your artwork. We also reserve the right to modify the design or use selected components of the design that will be best suited for the banner format and ratio, legibility, best impact and aesthetics. 2 By entering this contest, each participant consents to the use of their name and/or photo in any publication, advertisement or merchandise without further notice or compensation. The City of Monticello can publish or use any submitted designs at their sole discretion. In turn, the contestant still retains the right to use and publish their photo. By entering this competition, entrant agrees to all terms described herein, and allows their artwork to be displayed publicly. Each participant, by registering for the contest, agrees to hold harmless and release the City of Monticello and each of their staff members, consultants, and any other person or entity associated with this Contest from any and all liability claims or actions of any kind with respect to or in any way arising from this Contest, participation in any Contest -related activity; and/or delivery/misdelivery, acceptance, possession, use, or misuse of a prize, including but not limited to damage or loss of any other kind. The City of Monticello assumes no responsibility for any error; omission; interruption; deletion; defect; delay in operation or transmission; communications -line failure; or theft, destruction, unauthorized access to, or alteration of entries. The City of Monticello is not responsible for cheating or fraud by any participant. Any activities intended to disrupt or interfere with the proper play of the contest or to defraud the City of Monticello in any way will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. Participants who engage in any of the foregoing activities will be disqualified and will forfeit any prizes won. The City of Monticello reserves the right, at its sole discretion, to cancel, terminate, modify, or suspend the contest. Sponsor is not responsible for any typographical or other error in the printing of these Terms and Conditions or any materials associated with the administration of the contest or the announcement of the prizes. In all events, the sole maximum liability of the City of Monticello and its affiliates shall be limited to any of the prize(s) set forth herein. QUESTIONS Please contact us at 763-295-2711 or info@ci.monticello.mn.us if you have any questions. 3 City Council Agenda: 09/24/18 4A. Consideration to authorize the distribution of the Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for the proposed Haven Ridge development. (WSB/AS) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: An Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) has been prepared for the proposed Haven Ridge development. Haven Ridge is an approximately 217 acre development proposed along the south boundary of the City, within the Monticello Orderly Annexation Area. Developer Marc David Schulte's concept plan proposes a total of 359 units over the 217 acres. Due to the number of units within the development, at 273 unattached (single-family) and 76 units of attached (townhome) units, an EAW is required per Minnesota statutes. The property owner, Ronald and Lisa Denn and the Denn Family Partnership, have requested annexation of the parcels proposed to be platted as Haven Ridge. The City has acknowledged the petition for annexation and will review any final decision to annex in conjunction with future platting. As the property owner, working with the developer, intends to annex and plat the parcels within the City of Monticello, the City is the responsible government unit (RGU) for the EAW process. The purpose of an EAW is to identify environmental impacts, determine whether an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is needed, and to help inform future permitting. An EAW does not approve or deny a project. An EAW provides information about the project that may have the potential for significant environmental effects. Information provided in the EAW includes information about specific natural resources present within or adjacent to the project including land cover, wetlands, surface waters, geology, wildlife, historical properties, contaminated materials. The EAW also provides information about infrastructure (including public utility impacts and traffic analysis) and zoning of the project area and identifies any changes to existing infrastructure and land use application or other zoning approvals for the project area that may be needed. The EAW found no significant environmental effects for the project. The completed EAW is attached for Council reference. The EAW process requires that the EAW be distributed to specific regulatory agencies and interested parties. A list of parties that the EAW will be distributed to is attached. The distribution also includes a public notice to the Environmental Quality Board Monitor (EQB) on October 1, 2018. The distribution of the EAW will start the 30 day comment period to extend from October 1 to October 30. Once comments are received and addressed, it is planned to present the final EAW to the City Council in November to issue a decision on the need for an EIS. Al. Budget Impact: There is no budget impact to the City. The developer submitted a deposit based on the estimated cost as detailed within the scope of service for the EAW. A2. Staff Impact: Staff, including the City Engineer/Public Works Director and Community Development Director, will continue to be involved in the review and processing of the EAW document, along with WSB per their previously approved scope of services to prepare the EAW. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to authorize the distribution of the prepared Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for the proposed Haven Ridge development. 2. Motion of deny authorization for the distribution of the prepared Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for the proposed Haven Ridge development, based on findings to be made by the City Council. 3. Motion of other. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative #1 above. The Environmental Assessment Worksheet is required to be distributed and the City may not approve a land use application until such time as the document and required environmental process has been completed. It should be noted that a public hearing will be held for the anticipated preliminary plat and PUD submittals for the project. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Location Map B. EAW C. Distribution list 2 July 2013 version ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET This Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) form and EAW Guidelines are available at the Environmental Quality Board's website at: htty://www.e(ib.state.mn.us/EnvRevGuidanceDocuments.htm. The EAW form provides information about a project that may have the potential for significant environmental effects. The EAW Guidelines provide additional detail and resources for completing the EAW form. Cumulative potential effects can either be addressed under each applicable EAW Item, or can be addresses collectively under EAW Item 19. Note to reviewers: Comments must be submitted to the RGU during the 30 -day comment period following notice of the EAW in the EQB Monitor. Comments should address the accuracy and completeness of information, potential impacts that warrant further investigation and the need for an EIS. 1. Project title: Haven Ridge Development 2. Proposer: Marc David Schulte Contact person: Marc David Schulte Title: Address: 1765 123rd Lane City, State, ZIP: Coon Rapids, MN 55448 Phone: 952-687-9590 Fax: 3. RGU: City of Monticello Contact person: Angela Schumann Title: Community Development Director Address: 505 Walnut Street City, State, ZIP: Monticello, MN 55362 Phone: 763-271-3224 Fax: Email: mareschulte911@gmail.com Email: angela.schumann@ci.monticello.mn.us 4. Reason for EAW Preparation: (check one) Required: Discretionary: ❑ EIS Scoping ❑ Citizen petition X Mandatory EAW ❑ RGU discretion ❑ Proposer initiated If EAW or EIS is mandatory give EQB rule category subpart number(s) and name(s): Subp. 19. Residential Development D. 5. Project Location: County: Wright City/Township: Monticello Township PLS Location (1/4,'/4, Section, Township, Range): 523, 524, 526, T121, R25 Watershed (81 major watershed scale): 17 — Mississippi River -St. Cloud and 18 — North Fork Crow River GPS Coordinates: Tax Parcel Number: 213100234101, 213100234102, 213100242200, 213100261200 page 1 At a minimum attach each of the following to the EAW: • County map showing the general location of the project; • U.S. Geological Survey 7.5 minute, 1:24,000 scale map indicating project boundaries (photocopy acceptable); and • Site plans showing all significant project and natural features. Pre -construction site plan and post - construction site plan. Appendix A -Figures Figure 1 — Project Location - County Location Figure 2 — Project Location - USGS Map Figure 3 — Project Location — Aerial Figure 4a — Site Plan, Concept Color Figure 4b — Site Plan, Concept with Phasing Figure 5 — Existing Land Use Figure 6 — Planned Land Use Figure 7 — Existing Zoning Figure 8 — Soil Survey of Wright County Figure 9 — Surface Water Resources Figure 10 —County Well Index Figure 11 — Potential Contamination Areas Figure 12 — Existing Land Cover Figure 13 — Historical Sites Appendix B — Agency Correspondence Appendix C — Traffic Impact Study Appendix D — Well Logs page 2 6. Project Description: a. Provide the brief project summary to be published in the EQB Monitor, (approximately 50 words). The City of Monticello has prepared an EAW for a proposed residential development on 217 acres currently in Monticello Township. As part of the approval process, the development will be considered for annexation to the City of Monticello. The project includes 279 single family home units and 76 townhome units built in at least three phases. Construction will also include utility and roadway extensions. b. Give a complete description of the proposed project and related new construction, including infrastructure needs. If the project is an expansion include a description of the existing facility. Emphasize: 1) construction, operation methods and features that will cause physical manipulation of the environment or will produce wastes, 2) modifications to existing equipment or industrial processes, 3) significant demolition, removal or remodeling of existing structures, and 4) timing and duration of construction activities. Marc David Schulte is proposing Haven Ridge, a new residential development in Monticello Township. Prior to construction, the development will be considered for annexation to the City of Monticello. The project concept includes 279 single family home units and 76 townhome units. The project will include new infrastructure, such as gas, electric, telecommunications, sanitary sewer, storm sewer, watermain, streets, stormwater ponds, parking, sidewalks, trails, and streets. Sewer and water will connect with current municipal facilities. The project will occur in phases. Construction is expected to start in 2019. The project location is depicted in Figures 1-3, Appendix A. The proposed development plan is shown in Figure 4a and Figure 4b, Appendix A. Site Preparation and Grading — The site will be graded for residential lots, streets, and utilities. All grading and soil disturbance activity will occur in accordance with the Minnesota General Construction Stormwater Permit issued by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and City of Monticello requirements. The site will be graded in phases as development occurs. Utilities — The project will include new utility infrastructure, such as gas, electric, telecommunications, sanitary sewer, storm sewer, and watermain. Sewer and water will connect with municipal facilities. The City of Monticello is studying and planning for any necessary trunk utility improvements to connect the Haven Ridge development with municipal sewer and water service. At this time the proposed development will connect to the existing Monticello trunk sewer and water systems. The proposed development will connect to the Monticello water distribution system via the existing 12 -inch trunk watermain in the Klein Farms and Hunters Crossing subdivisions located north and west of the site. The proposed development will connect to the Monticello sanitary sewer system via an existing 10 -inch sanitary sewer in Farmstead Avenue or a newly installed lateral or trunk sanitary sewer. Future phases of the development will require the construction of a sanitary lift station or use of the newly installed trunk system. Building Construction — Building construction includes 279 single family home units and 76 townhome units built in phases. page 3 Roads/Pavin2 — The project will include construction of residential streets including trails, sidewalks, curb, and gutter. Demolition — The existing homestead and various outbuildings will be abandoned and demolition of these buildings will be required. c. Project magnitude: Total Project Acreage 217 acres Linear project length NA Number and type of residential units 355 units total, 339 unattached and 16 attached Commercial building area (in square feet) 0 Industrial building area (in square feet) 0 Institutional building area (in square feet) 0 Other uses — specify (in square feet) 0 Structure height(s) 2-3 stories * The type of units (unattached vs. attached) were identified according to the EAW guidance where unattached is single family homes and multi -family homes with three or fewer units and attached is multi -family home with four or greater units. d. Explain the project purpose; if the project will be carried out by a governmental unit, explain the need for the project and identify its beneficiaries. The Haven Ridge development is proposed by private development partners. The project will provide housing to meet the market-driven needs for increased housing in the City of Monticello and Wright County. e. Are future stages of this development including development on any other property planned or likely to happen? ❑ Yes X No If yes, briefly describe future stages, relationship to present project, timeline and plans for environmental review. f. Is this project a subsequent stage of an earlier project? ❑ Yes X No If yes, briefly describe the past development, timeline and any past environmental review. page 4 7. Cover types: Estimate the acreage of the site with each of the following cover types before and after development: Table 1. Land Cover Before After Before After Wetlands 29 25 Lawn/landscaping 0 58.6 Deep 8.6 8.6 Impervious 5.7 92.3 water/streams surface Wooded/forest 9.5 0 Stormwater Pond 0 8.6 Brush/Grassland 32.2 23.9 Other (describe) 0 0 Cropland 132 0 TOTAL 217 217 8. Permits and approvals required: List all known local, state and federal permits, approvals, certifications and financial assistance for the project. Include modifications of any existing permits, governmental review of plans and all direct and indirect forms of public financial assistance including bond guarantees, Tax Increment Financing and infrastructure. All of these final decisions are prohibited until all appropriate environmental review has been completed. See Minnesota Rules, Chapter 4410.3100. Table 2. Approvals and Permits Required Unit of Government Type of Application Status Federal US Army Corps of Engineers Section 404 Permit To Be Obtained, if needed State Department of Natural Resources Water Appropriation Permit To Be Obtained, if needed Pollution Control Agency NPDES Construction Permit To Be Obtained Pollution Control Agency Sanitary Sewer Extension To Be Obtained Pollution Control Agency Section 401 Permit To Be Obtained, if needed Department of Health Watermain Extension/Plan Review To Be Obtained County Wright County Soil and Water Conservation Wetland Conservation Act Approval To Be Obtained District Wright County Final Plat approval To Be Obtained Wright County Highway Department Approval To Be Obtained Local City of Monticello Development Application/Land To Be Obtained Disturbance Permit City of Monticello Planned Unit Development To Be Obtained Application City of Monticello Amendment to Comprehensive Land To Be Obtained Use Plan City of Monticello Annexation Petition To Be Obtained City of Monticello Preliminary and Final Plat Approvals To Be Obtained page 5 City of Monticello I Rezoning Approval I To Be Obtained Cumulative potential effects may be considered and addressed in response to individual EAW Item Nos. 9-18, or the RGU can address all cumulative potential effects in response to EAW Item No. 19. If addressing cumulative effect under individual items, make sure to include information requested in EAW Item No. 19 9. Land use: a. Describe: i. Existing land use of the site as well as areas adjacent to and near the site, including parks, trails, prime or unique farmlands. The site is a mix of pasture and farmland with one homestead. The project area contains both prime and unique farmlands. The northern part of the project area along Fallon Avenue is identified as prime farmland by the Wright County Soil Survey. The southern part of the project area is identified as farmland of state importance. Areas around wetlands are identified as prime farmland if drained or prime farmland if protected from flooding. The larger wetland areas are identified as not prime farmland. The City of Monticello's city boundary is immediately north of the project area. The area near the project area that is within the City of Monticello is made up of residential developments with typical development amenities like city parks, sidewalks, and trails. The other areas around the project area are a mix of farm land and rural residential. The project area is bordered to the northwest by a City of Monticello residential development, to the south by a public waters wetland, and to the west and east by farmland with scattered rural homesteads. ii. Plans. Describe planned land use as identified in comprehensive plan (if available) and any other applicable plan for land use, water, or resources management by a local, regional, state, or federal agency. The area has been identified in multiple plans as an annexation area for the City of Monticello. The northern tip of the project area along Fallon Avenue and 851h Street was included as part of the original annexation area that was identified in the 1995 Orderly Annexation Agreement (OAA) between the City of Monticello and Monticello Township. Subsequent revisions of the OAA have expanded that annexation area to include the entire project area. The north part of project area along Fallon Avenue is identified in the City of Monticello's 2008 Comprehensive Plan (2008 Comp Plan) as a Place to Live. The Place to Live category designates areas where housing is or will be the primary land use. The 2008 Comp Plan specifies that this category includes a variety of housing types to accommodate a range of households within the City. The rest of the project area is identified in the 2008 Comp Plan as Urban Reserve. The Urban Reserve category contains all areas in the OAA that are not listed for development in the near term of the 2008 Comp Plan. The objective of the Urban Reserve category is to encourage rural and agricultural uses in the short term to preserve the area for future development opportunities. The 2008 Comp Plan anticipated the City of page 6 Monticello will eventually expand into the Urban Reserve area once the other planned use areas like the Place to Live category areas are developed and future growth is needed. Part of the Urban Reserve area is also likely to be preserved as natural resource areas or for agricultural purposes. The area is identified in the Monticello Township Land Use Plan as Transition Area. Transition Areas are land at the urban/rural fringe. Transition Areas are identified by Wright County to economically and efficiently accommodate growth pressures. iii. Zoning, including special districts or overlays such as shoreland, floodplain, wild and scenic rivers, critical area, agricultural preserves, etc. The area zoned by Wright County as general agricultural. As stated above, the area is within the OAA between the City of Monticello and Monticello Township. b. Discuss the project's compatibility with nearby land uses, zoning, and plans listed in Item 9a above, concentrating on implications for environmental effects. New residential developments of this scale and density within the OAA are anticipated under the terms of the OAA agreement to be annexed to the City of Monticello and served with municipal utilities. The residential development is compatible with the 2008 Comp Plan including its location in Urban Reserve. The location of the development follows the City of Monticello and Monticello Township's intent to orderly development the area. The location is contiguous to the current corporate boundary, adjacent to existing residential development, and can be served by available municipal utilities and/or capacity. c. Identify measures incorporated into the proposed project to mitigate any potential incompatibility as discussed in Item 9b above. The development approval process will need to include rezoning and annexation of the area by the City of Monticello in order make the project compatible with relevant plans and agreements. The relevant approvals and permits for this process are included in Table 2. 10. Geology, soils and topography/land forms: a. Geology - Describe the geology underlying the project area and identify and map any susceptible geologic features such as sinkholes, shallow limestone formations, unconfined/shallow aquifers, or karst conditions. Discuss any limitations of these features for the project and any effects the project could have on these features. Identify any project designs or mitigation measures to address effects to geologic features. The Project area overlies surficial glacial terrain primarily composed of Quaternary -age sediments deposited by the most recent glacial period, the Wisconsin Episode. Sediment depth within the project area ranges from 100 to 200 feet above sedimentary, Paleozoic age bedrock. No bedrock outcrops exist in Wright County. Soils in this area are principally derived from glacial till and are interbedded with occasional fluvial sand or gravel outwash deposits. page 7 The Project area overlies Middle to Upper Cambrian age sandstone and siltstone bedrock. The southern boundary of the project area encounters bedrock of the Eau Claire Formation, which is described as consisting of very fine-grained, feldspathic sandstone and siltstone, with small inclusions of shale partings. The Eau Claire Formation has a maximum thickness of 70 feet and generally has very low permeability. The majority of the project area overlies Wonewoc Sandstone, which is quartzose in composition and ranges from a fine-grained texture at the base to a coarser, more poorly sorted texture at the upper part of the formation. The northeastern corner of the Project area encounters bedrock of the Tunnel City Group, which includes Mazomanie Formation sandstone (present in the upper 40 feet of bedrock) overlying Lone Rock Formation sandstone and siltstone interbedded with thin shale partings. The Mazomanie sandstone is a medium -grain composition and has high permeability and potential for aquifers. The Lone Rock sandstone is feldspathic and fine-grained, and generally has very low permeability. There are no bedrock exposures, karst features, or known geologic hazards due to the bedrock within the project area. Surficial geologic mapping in the area shows a large portion of the Project area overlying fluvial glacial outwash comprised of sand and gravel of mixed provenance. This outwash may be intermixed with or buried below patchy areas of till. The southeastern corner of the Project area may encounter till of loam to sandy -loam composition intermixed with small lenses of silt, sand, and gravel in places. The outwash and till present in the project area are characteristic of the Twin Cities Member, belonging to the New Ulm Formation. Sediment of the Twin Cities Member was deposited by ice and meltwater from the Grantsburg sublobe, an offshoot of the Des Moines lobe, as it retreated and passed over the St. Croix Moraine. Quaternary sediment in Wright County is very thick and may range from 100-200 feet within the project area. Wright County obtains most of its groundwater from stratified sedimentary bedrock sources. The project area overlies Wonewoc Sandstone, which is highly permeable bedrock and is the primary source layer of most aquifers in Wright County. However, shallow water -table conditions are common in Wright County. The water table in the project area ranges mainly from 20-22 feet below surface, with some small areas that may reach 20 feet below surface on the western side of the project area. There are areas within the project boundaries where water is present at the surface. Data from the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) County Well Index locates five wells within a 500 -foot boundary of the Project area. Static water level depth data from these wells ranges from 20-51 feet below surface, and depends on topography and climate conditions, as shallow groundwater systems are replenished solely by precipitation. For more information on well data from the Project area, please refer to Section 11. The deep glacial sediments and deeply buried bedrock do not present any limitations to the proposed residential development project. Due to the outwash underlying most of the project area, the shallow subsurface likely contains materials suitable for fill. According to the DNR, the project is positioned in an area that has potential for aggregate resources. Other aggregate deposits are likely within the area but have not been investigated and mapped. Excavations, borrow, and grading are expected to be in the upper 20 feet of the existing surface and are not anticipated to encounter geologic bedrock hazards; however, soil limitations for roadways and residential development, discussed in more detail below, and a potential to impact page 8 shallow alluvial aquifers requires engineering assessments and preparation of plans and specifications that acknowledge the limitations and risks. b. Soils and topography - Describe the soils on the site, giving NRCS (SCS) classifications and descriptions, including limitations of soils. Describe topography, any special site conditions relating to erosion potential, soil stability or other soils limitations, such as steep slopes, highly permeable soils. Provide estimated volume and acreage of soil excavation and/or grading. Discuss impacts from project activities (distinguish between construction and operational activities) related to soils and topography. Identify measures during and after project construction to address soil limitations including stabilization, soil corrections or other measures. Erosion/sedimentation control related to stormwater runoff should be addressed in response to Item 11.b.ii. Table 3 lists the soils in the project area. The soils are well drained to poorly drained. The existing site topography is mostly flat with some shallow hills in the northeast section of the project area and small depressions around surface waters. Figure 8, Appendix A shows the soils on the project area. Table 3. Wright County Soil Survey Map Percent Symbol Soil Name Slope 1037 Eckvoll loamy fine sand, map >25, 0 to 3 percent slopes 0% to 3% 106C2 Lester loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes, eroded 6% to 12% 106D2 Lester loam, 12 to 18 percent slopes, eroded 12% to 18% 1080 Klossner, Okoboji, and Glencoe soils, ponded, 0 to 1 percent slopes 0% to 1% 109 Cordova clay loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes 0% to 2% 1110 Isan sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes 0% to 2% 114 Glencoe clay loam, depressional, 0 to 1 percent slopes 0% to 1% 1224 Hubbard-Verndale, acid substratum, complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes 0% to 3% 1362B Angus loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes 2% to 5% 1368 Southhaven loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes 0% to 2% 1377B Dorset -Two Inlets complex, 2 to 6 percent slopes 2% to 6% 1377C Dorset -Two Inlets complex, 6 to 12 percent slopes 6% to 12% 1379B Dorset-Almora complex, 1 to 4 percent slopes 1% to 4% 1388B Terril loam, moderately wet, 2 to 6 percent slopes 2% to 6% 1438B Braham loamy fine sand, moderately wet, 2 to 5 percent slopes 2% to 5% 1901B Angus -Le Sueur complex, 1 to 5 percent slopes 1% to 5% 1942 Forada mucky loam, depressional, 0 to 1 percent slopes 0% to 1% 1975 Oylen sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes 0% to 2% 260 Duelm loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes 0% to 2% page 9 Map Percent Symbol Soil Name Slope 375 Forada loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes 0% to 2% 406 Dorset sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes 0% to 2% 441 Almora loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes 0% to 2% W Water The volume and acreage of soil moved has been estimated based on assuming approximately 1.5 feet of material will be graded over the development area (217 acres). Construction will involve the movement of 325.5 acre-feet of soil. Development within the project area will be designed to conform with applicable state and local standards, including National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Construction Stormwater General Permit requirements. NOTE: For silica sand projects, the EAW must include a hydrogeologic investigation assessing the potential groundwater and surface water effects and geologic conditions that could create an increased risk of potentially significant effects on groundwater and surface water. Descriptions of water resources and potential effects from the project in EAW Item 11 must be consistent with the geology, soils and topography/land forms and potential effects described in EAW Item 10. 11. Water resources: a. Describe surface water and groundwater features on or near the site in a.i. and adi. below. i. Surface water - lakes, streams, wetlands, intermittent channels, and county/judicial ditches. Include any special designations such as public waters, trout stream/lake, wildlife lakes, migratory waterfowl feeding/resting lake, and outstanding resource value water. Include water quality impairments or special designations listed on the current MPCA 303d Impaired Waters List that are within 1 mile of the project. Include DNR Public Waters Inventory number(s), if any. A wetland delineation was completed in 2018 by Kjolhaug Environmental. This wetland delineation is being reviewed by the Wright County Soil and Water Conservation District as the Local Government Unit for the Wetland Conservation Act. Based on this wetland delineation, there are 11 wetlands within the project boundary covering an area of approximately 29 acres. One of the wetlands is an unnamed DNR Public Water Wetland. There are no other special designated waters within the project area. ii. Groundwater — aquifers, springs, seeps. Include: 1) depth to groundwater; 2) if project is within a MDH wellhead protection area; 3) identification of any onsite and/or nearby wells, including unique numbers and well logs if available. If there are no wells known on site or nearby, explain the methodology used to determine this. The static groundwater level is approximately 20-22 feet below the land surface. The proposed development is located outside of the City of Monticello's Drinking Water Supply Management Area (DWSMA). There are no wells located within the proposed development, however there are five wells located within 500 feet of the development boundary. Figure 10, page 10 Appendix A shows the well locations and Table 4 lists the well, its status, its use, and its groundwater elevation. Well logs are available in Appendix D. Any wells that would be impacted by the Project would be sealed by a licensed well contractor according to Minnesota Rules, Chapter 4725, or be relocated and coordinated with the MPCA and MDH. Table 4. Project Area Wells Well ID Status Use Water Elevation (feet) 609694 Active Domestic 20 136613 Active Domestic 51 523950 Active Domestic 38 662223 Active Domestic 22 789748 Active Irrigation 21 b. Describe effects from project activities on water resources and measures to minimize or mitigate the effects in Item b.i. through Item b.iv. below. Wastewater - For each of the following, describe the sources, quantities and composition of all sanitary, municipal/domestic and industrial wastewater produced or treated at the site. 1) If the wastewater discharge is to a publicly owned treatment facility, identify any pretreatment measures and the ability of the facility to handle the added water and waste loadings, including any effects on, or required expansion of, municipal wastewater infrastructure. 2) If the wastewater discharge is to a subsurface sewage treatment systems (SSTS), describe the system used, the design flow, and suitability of site conditions for such a system. 3) If the wastewater discharge is to surface water, identify the wastewater treatment methods and identify discharge points and proposed effluent limitations to mitigate impacts. Discuss any effects to surface or groundwater from wastewater discharges. Wastewater generated within the proposed development will discharge to the Monticello sanitary sewer system via an existing 10 -inch sanitary sewer in Farmstead Avenue and/or a newly installed lateral or trunk sanitary sewer. Future phases of the development will require the construction of a sanitary lift station or use of the newly installed trunk system. At present, the local sanitary sewer system has sufficient capacity for projected flows from the development. Wastewater will be conveyed through the City sanitary sewer system to the Monticello Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP). The Monticello WWTP has a treatment capacity of 2.36 million gallons per day (MGD). The average flow to the Monticello WWTP from 2015-2017 was 1.26 MGD, so the plant has a residual capacity of 1.10 MGD. Table 5 is an estimate of the wastewater flow from the proposed development. page 11 page 12 Table 5. Wastewater Flow Calculations Flow Land Use Type Units Assumption (gpd/unit)* RI Lot Residential 243 182 RA Lot Residential 36 182 R3 Lot Residential 76 182 Average Flow (gpd) Average Daily Flow (gpd) Peak Hourly Flow Factor** Peak Hourly Flow (gpd) Peak Hourly Flow (gpm) *Based on 85% of water use in 201 7for existing residential development in the area. **Peak factor based on average daily flow per standard Metropolitan Council values. 44,226 6,552 13,832 64,610 4.0 258,440 179 The Monticello WWTP has sufficient residual capacity to treat the estimated 0.06 MGD of average wastewater flow that will be generated by the proposed development. Additionally, the wastewater will be domestic in character and will not require specific pretreatment measures. ii. Stormwater - Describe the quantity and quality of stormwater runoff at the site prior to and post construction. Include the routes and receiving water bodies for runoff from the site (major downstream water bodies as well as the immediate receiving waters). Discuss any environmental effects from stormwater discharges. Describe stormwater pollution prevention plans including temporary and permanent runoff controls and potential BMP site locations to manage or treat stormwater runoff. Identify specific erosion control, sedimentation control or stabilization measures to address soil limitations during and after project construction. Existine Conditions Under existing conditions, the site contains primarily agricultural land with wetlands and scattered rural homesteads. Stormwater discharges from the site at three locations as shown in Figure 9, Appendix A. Table 6 below lists the tributary area for each of the sub -watershed discharge locations identified in the 2006 Monticello Water Resources Management Plan (WRMP). Table 6. Tributary Area Summary Discharge Location Area (ac) TH27 25.4 GL -04 106.0 KFS -09/10 84.7 TH27 is part of the Trunk Highway 25 subwatershed system that discharges to north to the large basin on the west side of Trunk Highway 25 north of School Boulevard. KFS - 09/10 is part of the Klein Farms subwatershed system and discharges west under Fallon Avenue NE and along the power line corridor to the large basin on the west side of Trunk page 13 Highway 25 north of School Boulevard. Both of these major subwatersheds ultimately drain north to the Mississippi River and are included in the Citywide HydroCAD model. There are no existing stormwater treatment or infiltration basins within either of the TH27 or KFS -09/10 subwatersheds. GL -04 drains through a series of basins and is part of the Gillchrist Lake subwatershed. GL -04 does not drain to the Mississippi River. Gillchrist Lake is located approximately 5 miles from the City of Monticello, near the City of Buffalo. The Gillchrist Lake subwatershed is included in the WRMP, however it is not included in the Citywide HydroCAD model. Even though this area was not included in the HydroCAD model, City standards and design criteria are applicable. GL -04-1 does not have existing stormwater treatment or infiltration basins. This segment of the Mississippi River (AUID 07010203-729) is impaired for PCB and mercury in fish tissue and fecal coliform (2018 Impaired Waters List, MPCA). This affects aquatic consumption and recreational uses. As of 2018, the MPCA does not list Gillchrist Lake as an impaired water. A HydroCAD model was created to compare the existing and proposed discharge rates leaving the site. The proposed model was based on preliminary development design and it was assumed that existing drainage patterns will be maintained post -project. Atlas 14 MSE3 storm events depths that were simulated in the models and are provided in Table 7. Table 7. Atlas 14 MSE3 Storms Storm Event Rainfall Depth (in) 2 year, 24 -hr 2.84 10 year, 24 -hr 4.22 100 year, 24 -hr 6.87 Existing peak discharge rates at each of the three locations are provided in Table 8. Table 8. Existing Peak Discharge Rates Leaving the Site Discharge Location 2 -year (cfs) 10 -year (cfs) 100 -year (cfs) TH27 14 33 75 KF -09/10 38 88 200 GL -04 45 102 228 Relevant Regulations and Considerations The required regulations and permits related to temporary and permanent stormwater management are: • City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance- Chapter 4, section 4.10 related to grading, drainage, stormwater management and erosion control • City of Monticello Plan Requirements and Design Guidelines (Design Manual) page 14 City of Monticello Grading Permit Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) National Pollutant Discharge/State Disposal System (NPDES/SDS) Construction Stormwater (CSW) Permit All grading and erosion control plans shall conform to the most recent editions of the Minnesota Stormwater Manual, the National Urban Runoff Program (NURP), NPDES/SDS CSW Permit, MPCA Minimal Impact Design Standards (MIDS), the City of Monticello Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan, the City's most recent Design Standards (Design Manual), and City Standard Detail Plates. Required plan submittal materials and hydrologic/hydraulic models are listed in the Design Manual. Conformance to City Standards is the most restrictive. Specifically, the City regulates stormwater runoff rate, volume, and treatment. The requirements are as follows: - Runoff Rate Control: Peak runoff rates for the proposed development shall not exceed existing peak runoff rates for the 2-, 10-, and 100 -year Atlas 14 storm events for all points where stormwater leaves the property. Detention basins shall be designed with an outlet sized to meet runoff rate control and live storage capacity to contain the critical 100 -year storm event. Conformance to City freeboard standards will be based on the 100 -year critical High Water Level Elevation (HWL). For preliminary planning purposes the proposed HydroCAD model was used to estimate the area footprint for stormwater rate control ponds. The anticipated footprint is based on 4:1 side slopes and a maximum depth of 4 feet between the outlet and the 100 -year HWL. Table 9 summarizes the model results. Table 9. Approximate Stormwater Pond Area Required for Rate Control Subwatershed Pond Area at 100 -year HWL (ac) TH27 2.0 KF -09/10 4.0 GL -04 4.6 - Runoff Volume Control: Runoff volume control shall be provided on-site. Proposed developments shall capture and retain 1.1 inches of runoff from the new and/or fully developed impervious surfaces. An estimate of the approximate footprint that would be required for an infiltration basin that meets City standards is provided in Table 10. The size of the infiltration basin is largely dependent on the underlying soils and a maximum allowable 48-hour drawdown time. The Wright County Soil Survey indicates that this area is made up almost entirely of Hydrologic Soil Group (HSG) Type B soils. For this reason, an infiltration rate of 0.45 inches per hour was used for the calculation, based on guidance from the Minnesota Stormwater Manual. It is important to note that design page 15 infiltration rates, along with feasibility, must be confirmed with recent infiltration testing and soil boring results prior to construction. Table 10. Approximate Area Required for Infiltration Basin Subwatershed Area (ac) TH27 1.0 KF -09/10 1.7 GL -04 2.6 Water Quality Treatment: New development projects are to have a no net increase from pre -project conditions of total volume, Total Suspended Solids (TSS), and Total Phosphorus (TP). The NPDES water quality standard is to design a basin with a permanent volume of 1,800 cubic feet of storage below the outlet pipe for each acre that drains to the basin. The approximate area required to meet this standard is the area encompassed by the water surface for the pond (Table 11). Table 11. Approximate Surface Area at NWL Subwatershed Area (ac) TH27 KF -09/10 GL -04 0.3 0.8 0.9 For new development, the water quality treatment standards are satisfied if the volume control standard has been satisfied, with pretreatment. This also assumes that the infiltration basin receives runoff from new impervious surfaces, otherwise treatment will not be occurring. If infiltration is determined to be not feasible, the MIDS Design Sequence Flowchart and the City Design Guide provide guidance on how to meet water quality standards. The City requires that any relevant data for the variance request is well documented and included in submittals. In addition to the requirements listed above, a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) will need to be prepared in accordance with NPDES guidelines and the City Design Guide. The SWPPP and permit shall be submitted and approved prior to construction. Stormwater management for the site will be met through various BMPs as outlined in this section. It is possible for the total area required for volume, water quality, and rate control to be provided within the footprint of the 100 -year HWL elevation at the rate control pond. The Minnesota Stormwater Manual provides guidance for possible design options. page 16 The proposed ponding areas shown in the concept plan will need to be further evaluated as the project moves forward. Existing drainage patterns will need to be maintained along with following the requirements outlined in this section. The design, plans and stormwater management report need to be submitted for review prior to the City issuing a grading permit. There will be no anticipated downstream environmental effects from the proposed project based on the project meeting the state and local requirements listed in this document. Water appropriation - Describe if the project proposes to appropriate surface or groundwater (including dewatering). Describe the source, quantity, duration, use and purpose of the water use and if a DNR water appropriation permit is required. Describe any well abandonment. If connecting to an existing municipal water supply, identify the wells to be used as a water source and any effects on, or required expansion of, municipal water infrastructure. Discuss environmental effects from water appropriation, including an assessment of the water resources available for appropriation. Identify any measures to avoid, minimize, or mitigate environmental effects from the water appropriation. The proposed development will connect to the Monticello water distribution system via the existing 12 -inch trunk watermain in the Klein Farms and Hunters Crossing sub- divisions. The City's water supply system includes five (5) groundwater wells, one (1) water tower, two (2) ground storage tanks, and approximately 49 miles of watermain. From 2010-2015, the City's average groundwater withdrawal was 573 million gallons per year (MGY). The City's existing DNR water appropriation permit allows for withdrawal of up to 800 MGY. Table 12 is an estimate of the water demands for the proposed development. Based on the estimated annual demand of 27.7 MGY, additional groundwater appropriation will not be required. The entire development is located outside of the City's Drinking Water Supply Management Area (DWSMA). Table 12. Water Demand Calculations Demand Average Land Use Type Units Assumption Demand (gpd/unit)* (gpd) RI Lot Residential 243 214 52,002 RA Lot Residential 36 214 7,704 R3 Lot Residential 76 214 16,264 Average Day Demand (gpd) 75,970 Annual Demand (MGY) 27.7 Peak Day Demand Factor** 2.6 Peak Day Demand (gpd) 197,522 Peak Day Demand (gpm) 137 *Unit demand based on water use data for residential customers in the area in 2017. **Historical peak day factor from 2010-2015. page 17 iv. Surface Waters a) Wetlands - Describe any anticipated physical effects or alterations to wetland features such as draining, filling, permanent inundation, dredging and vegetative removal. Discuss direct and indirect environmental effects from physical modification of wetlands, including the anticipated effects that any proposed wetland alterations may have to the host watershed. Identify measures to avoid (e.g., available alternatives that were considered), minimize, or mitigate environmental effects to wetlands. Discuss whether any required compensatory wetland mitigation for unavoidable wetland impacts will occur in the same minor or major watershed, and identify those probable locations. Based on the draft wetland delineation report submitted by the developer and the proposed concept plan, there will be approximately four acres of wetland impact. The total acreage of wetlands on the site would decrease from 29 acres to 25 acres. Figure 9, Appendix A shows the draft wetland boundaries. There is a total of eleven wetlands on the site. Impacts to wetlands will occur from the filling of wetlands for residential lots and roadways. From the concept plan, it appears that five of the ten impacted wetlands will be completely impacted. The other five impacted wetlands will be partially filled by residential lots or roadways. One wetland, the large public waters wetland, will be completed avoided. It is unknown at this time if any of the impact wetlands are outside of regulation by either the Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) or USACE Section 404. The jurisdictional status will need to be determined during the wetland boundary/type approval or the wetland permitting process. Due to the presence of wetlands on the site, the developer is required to submit a wetland delineation report to the Wright County SWCD as LGU for WCA, for the SWCD's review and approval. Approved wetland delineation lines are required to be shown on all relevant plans. The developer has started this process by submitting a wetland delineation report to Wright County SWCD in August 2018. The development is also required under WCA to either avoid all impacts to wetlands or to submit a wetland permit justifying the wetland impacts and proposing mitigation for them. Wright County SWCD will look for the developer to either submit a plan showing no wetland impacts or submit a wetland permit. It is unlikely that the developer would be able to accomplish the development as shown in the concept plan without impacting wetlands. Since the current concept plan shows wetland impacts, it is anticipated that the project will impact wetlands, therefore a wetland replacement plan and permit should be submitted. Approval of the wetland permit is required prior to site construction. As part of the wetland permit, the development will need to follow the minimization requirements. Wetland mitigation will be required to follow the siting requirements for WCA and the USACE. The City of Monticello also requires wetland buffers to be designed around wetlands within the project area. Designation of the wetland buffers will be required as part of the development plans. The concept plan does not show wetland buffers. Future plans will be required to show wetland buffers. page 18 b) Other surface waters- Describe any anticipated physical effects or alterations to surface water features (lakes, streams, ponds, intermittent channels, county/judicial ditches) such as draining, filling, permanent inundation, dredging, diking, stream diversion, impoundment, aquatic plant removal and riparian alteration. Discuss direct and indirect environmental effects from physical modification of water features. Identify measures to avoid, minimize, or mitigate environmental effects to surface water features, including in -water Best Management Practices that are proposed to avoid or minimize turbidity/sedimentation while physically altering the water features. Discuss how the project will change the number or type of watercraft on any water body, including current and projected watercraft usage. There is one surface water feature (a DNR Public Water Wetland) within the project area. The development concept plan shows no impacts to this or other surface water features. The City of Monticello will require a wetland buffer to be established around the DNR Public Water Wetland. BMPs around the wetland will be required under the NPDES permit as well. 12. Contamination/Hazardous Materials/Wastes: a. Pre -project site conditions - Describe existing contamination or potential environmental hazards on or in close proximity to the project site such as soil or ground water contamination, abandoned dumps, closed landfills, existing or abandoned storage tanks, and hazardous liquid or gas pipelines. Discuss any potential environmental effects from pre - project site conditions that would be caused or exacerbated by project construction and operation. Identify measures to avoid, minimize or mitigate adverse effects from existing contamination or potential environmental hazards. Include development of a Contingency Plan or Response Action Plan. Publicly available data from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) database were reviewed to identify verified or potentially contaminated sites that may be encountered during the proposed development (Figure 11, Appendix A). The following databases were reviewed: MPCA "What's in My Neighborhood?" website MPCA Storage Tank Leak Site website US Department of Agriculture "What's in My Neighborhood?" website Two listings exist within the project site (site ID 53398 and 58100), and several other listings exist within 500 feet of the project area. These listings on the project site are both feedlots. Within 500 feet, the listings include Hazardous Waste, Water, and Multiple Listings. Based on this review, the potential to encounter contaminated soil and/or groundwater at the proposed project area is low. If any contaminated soil/groundwater or hazardous material is encountered, necessary steps to remediate will be taken in accordance with MPCA regulations. b. Project related generation/storage of solid wastes - Describe solid wastes generated/stored during construction and/or operation of the project. Indicate method of disposal. Discuss potential environmental effects from solid waste handling, storage and disposal. Identify page 19 measures to avoid, minimize or mitigate adverse effects from the generation/storage of solid waste including source reduction and recycling. Development associated with the project will generate solid waste and construction debris normal to construction. Solid waste and construction debris will be disposed of in conformance with state standards. The proposed residential development is expected to generate typical household wastes. Users will be required to recycle consistent with the City's policies, and all recycling and solid waste disposal will be removed from the site by licensed haulers. c. Project related use/storage of hazardous materials - Describe chemicals/hazardous materials used/stored during construction and/or operation of the project including method of storage. Indicate the number, location and size of any above or below ground tanks to store petroleum or other materials. Discuss potential environmental effects from accidental spill or release of hazardous materials. Identify measures to avoid, minimize or mitigate adverse effects from the use/storage of chemicals/hazardous materials including source reduction and recycling. Include development of a spill prevention plan. Small amounts of hazardous materials typical of a construction site (e.g., fuel oil) will be stored in approved containers. As required by the NPDES Construction Stormwater Permit, the fuel containers will be required to have secondary containment by either being bermed or stored in a truck or other facility. Fuel trucks and any other hazardous material are required to be locked when not in use to avoid vandalism. d. Project related generation/storage of hazardous wastes - Describe hazardous wastes generated/stored during construction and/or operation of the project. Indicate method of disposal. Discuss potential environmental effects from hazardous waste handling, storage, and disposal. Identify measures to avoid, minimize or mitigate adverse effects from the generation/storage of hazardous waste including source reduction and recycling. Construction within any of the subject parcels will not involve the generation of significant amounts of hazardous wastes. Once construction is completed, it is anticipated that the waste generated will be of similar nature to household wastes and will be disposed of similarly. There are no gas stations proposed that would include storing of hazardous materials. page 20 13. Fish, wildlife, plant communities, and sensitive ecological resources (rare features): a. Describe fish and wildlife resources as well as habitats and vegetation on or in near the site. Current land cover consists mostly of agricultural land, wetlands and a small portion of short grasses and mixed trees. The only notable wildlife resources on site consist of the wetlands and wooded area that surrounds it, which could contain habitat for waterfowl. The public water wetland on the south edge of the site provides habitat for fish. There are no designated trout streams, Wildlife Management Areas, Waterfowl Production Areas, Wildlife Refuges, Reinvest in Minnesota (RIM) easements, wild rice lakes, or Outstanding Resource Value Waters (ORVWs) within any of the parcels. There are no Minnesota County Biological Survey (MCBS) or Areas of Ecological Significance within or near the project area. b. Describe rare features such as state -listed (endangered, threatened or special concern) species, native plant communities, Minnesota County Biological Survey Sites of Biodiversity Significance, and other sensitive ecological resources on or within close proximity to the site. Provide the license agreement number (LA-) and/or correspondence number (ERDB ) from which the data were obtained and attach the Natural Heritage letter from the DNR. Indicate if any additional habitat or species survey work has been conducted within the site and describe the results. A request for data was sent to the DNR and a response has not been received yet. c. Discuss how the identified fish, wildlife, plant communities, rare features and ecosystems may be affected by the project. Include a discussion on introduction and spread of invasive species from the project construction and operation. Separately discuss effects to known threatened and endangered species. The City of Monticello completed a Natural Resources Inventory that included the project area. The Natural Resources Inventory was used to evaluate site land cover. The planned development will result in the removal of vegetation and subsequent habitat, primarily in areas planned for development. The current site is already mostly unsuitable habitat. The development is expected to occur on areas that are currently agricultural while avoiding the larger wetland basins. The areas of the site that provide habitat to wildlife are expected to be avoided. Impacts to the wetlands that may occur will be minimized per requirements of the Wetland Conservation Act and US Army Corps of Engineers and vetted through the regulatory permitting process. Mitigation for wetland impacts would occur at a 2:1 ratio. Invasive Species The site may contain some invasive species, although no site-specific information is currently available. The US Department of Agriculture's National Invasive Species Information Center provides information regarding Best Management Practices to prevent or mitigate invasive species establishment or movement. Guidance for implementation at all parcels can be referenced at httDs://www.invasivesDeciesinfo.2ov/toolkit/iDreventionbmD.shtml. Appropriate actions such as cleaning equipment, chipping/destroying invasive species, and limiting and securing soil disturbances will help prevent the spread of the invasive/noxious species. If necessary, herbicide application to page 21 pockets of weed growth could be implemented during and after construction, especially if soil particles are staged or left for future phases. d. Identify measures that will be taken to avoid, minimize, or mitigate adverse effects to fish, wildlife, plant communities, and sensitive ecological resources. The site concept plan has been designed to mostly avoid the larger wetlands on site. Additionally, buffers will be required around the wetlands. Development will convert the agricultural lands to residential development. While there are not high quality plant or wildlife resources at the site, some impact to wildlife could be anticipated due to the development as an open space converting to developed space. 14. Historic properties: Describe any historic structures, archeological sites, and/or traditional cultural properties on or in close proximity to the site. Include: 1) historic designations, 2) known artifact areas, and 3) architectural features. Attach letter received from the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO). Discuss any anticipated effects to historic properties during project construction and operation. Identify measures that will be taken to avoid, minimize, or mitigate adverse effects to historic properties. A database search request was sent to SHPO. The email received from SHPO indicated that there is a known archeological site adjacent to the eastern boundary of part of the project area (Figure 13, Appendix A). The part of the archeological site was shovel tested in 1983 and no cultural material was found. Additional research, including field survey, may be necessary to adequately assess the subject area's potential to contain archeological sites. 15. Visual: Describe any scenic views or vistas on or near the project site. Describe any project related visual effects such as vapor plumes or glare from intense lights. Discuss the potential visual effects from the project. Identify any measures to avoid, minimize, or mitigate visual effects. There are no scenic views or vistas on or near the project site. Development within the project area will be similar in nature to existing development in the area. Therefore, no visual impacts are anticipated. No vapor plumes or intense lighting will result from development of the subject parcels. 16. Air: a. Stationary source emissions - Describe the type, sources, quantities and compositions of any emissions from stationary sources such as boilers or exhaust stacks. Include any hazardous air pollutants, criteria pollutants, and any greenhouse gases. Discuss effects to air quality including any sensitive receptors, human health or applicable regulatory criteria. Include a discussion of any methods used assess the project's effect on air quality and the results of that assessment. Identify pollution control equipment and other measures that will be taken to avoid, minimize, or mitigate adverse effects from stationary source emissions. page 22 No stationary sources of emission such as boiler or stacks are anticipated with development in the area. b. Vehicle emissions - Describe the effect of the project's traffic generation on air emissions. Discuss the project's vehicle -related emissions effect on air quality. Identify measures (e.g. traffic operational improvements, diesel idling minimization plan) that will be taken to minimize or mitigate vehicle -related emissions. The EPA has identified a group of 93 compounds emitted from mobile sources that are listed in their Integrated Risk Information System. In addition, the EPA identified seven compounds with significant contributions from mobile sources that are among the national and regional -scale cancer risk drivers. These are acrolein, benzene, 1, 3 -butadiene, diesel particulate matter, plus diesel exhaust organic gases (diesel PM), formaldehyde, naphthalene, and polycyclic organic matter. While Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) considers these the priority mobile source air toxics, the list is subject to change and may be adjusted in consideration of future EPA rules. EPA rule requires controls that will dramatically decrease Mobile Source Air Toxins (MSAT) emissions through cleaner fuels and cleaner engines. According to an FHWA analysis using EPA's MOBILE6.2 model, even if vehicle activity increases as assumed, a combined reduction of 72 percent in the total annual emission rate for the priority MSAT is projected from 1999 to 2050. Air toxics analysis is a continuing area of research. While much work has been done to assess the overall health risk of air toxics, many questions remain unanswered. In particular, the tools and techniques for assessing project -specific health outcomes as a result of lifetime MSAT exposure remain limited. These limitations impede the ability to evaluate how the potential health risks posed by MSAT exposure should be factored into project -level decision-making within the context of the National Environmental Policy Act. The FHWA will continue to monitor the developing research in this emerging field. Because of the uncertainties outlined above, a quantitative assessment of the effects of air toxic emissions impacts on human health cannot be made at the project level. While available tools do allow us to reasonably predict relative emissions changes between alternatives for larger projects, the amount of MSAT emissions from each of the study scenarios and MSAT concentrations or exposures created by each of the study scenarios cannot be predicted with enough accuracy to be useful in estimating health impacts. Therefore, it is not possible to make a determination of whether any of the scenarios would have "significant adverse impacts on the human environment." This document acknowledges that the build condition may result in increased exposure to MSAT emissions in certain locations, although the concentrations and duration of exposures are uncertain, and because of this uncertainty, the health effects from these emissions cannot be estimated. Although a qualitative analysis cannot identify and measure health impacts from MSATs, it can give a basis for identifying and comparing the potential differences among MSAT emissions, if any, from the various scenarios. The qualitative assessment presented below is derived in part page 23 from a study conducted by the FHWA entitled A Methodology for Evaluating Mobile Source Air Toxic Emissions among Transportation Project Alternatives. For this EAW, the amount of MSAT emitted would be proportional to the average daily traffic (ADT). The ADT estimated for the full build condition is higher than that for the no build condition, because the project involves new development that produces additional trips. This increase in ADT means MSAT under the build scenarios would probably be higher than the no build condition in the study area. There could also be localized differences in MSAT from indirect effects of the project such as associated access traffic, emissions of evaporative MSAT (e.g., benzene) from parked cars, and emissions of diesel particulate matter from delivery trucks. Travel to other destinations would be reduced with subsequent decreases in emissions at those locations. For the build condition, emissions are virtually certain to be lower than present levels in the design year as a result of EPA's national control programs that are projected to reduce annual MSAT emissions by 72 percent from 1999 to 2050, as shown in the following graph. The magnitude of the EPA -projected reductions is so great (even after accounting for ADT growth) that MSAT emissions in the study area are likely to be lower in the future than they are today. NATIONAL MSAT EMISSION TRENDS 1999 - 2050 FOR VEHICLES OPERATING ON ROADWAYS USING EPA's MOBILE6.2 MODEL 150000 T y loomo a a -6 .L IN.0.f'H jAOI L' - 2000 2610 2020 2030 2040 2050 Calendar Year Note: (1) Annual emissions of polycyclic organic matter are projected to be 561 tons/yr for 1999, decreasing to 373 tons/yr for 2050. (2) Trends for specific locations may be different, depending on locally derived information representing vehicle -miles travelled, vehicle speeds, vehicle mix, fuels, emission control programs, meteorology, and other factors Source: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. MOBILE6.2 Model run 20 August 2009. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has designated all of Hennepin, Ramsey, and Anoka and portions of Carver, Scott, Dakota, Washington, and Wright Counties as a maintenance area for carbon monoxide. Since the EAW study area is in the portion of Wright County which is outside the carbon monoxide maintenance area, and therefore no additional analysis is required. page 24 c. Dust and odors - Describe sources, characteristics, duration, quantities, and intensity of dust and odors generated during project construction and operation. (Fugitive dust may be discussed under item 16a). Discuss the effect of dust and odors in the vicinity of the project including nearby sensitive receptors and quality of life. Identify measures that will be taken to minimize or mitigate the effects of dust and odors. During construction, particulate emissions will temporarily increase due to generation of fugitive dust. Construction dust control is required to be in conformance with City of Monticello ordinances and the NPDES Construction Stormwater permit. The construction and operation of the proposed residential development is not anticipated to involve processes that would generate odors. 17. Noise Describe sources, characteristics, duration, quantities, and intensity of noise generated during project construction and operation. Discuss the effect of noise in the vicinity of the project including 1) existing noise levels/sources in the area, 2) nearby sensitive receptors, 3) conformance to state noise standards, and 4) quality of life. Identify measures that will be taken to minimize or mitigate the effects of noise. The project site is surrounded by rural roads, farmland and residential developments. Existing noise sources are those typical of rural residential areas and consist mainly of traffic on the area roadways, which include Fallon Avenue, 851h Street, and Edmonson Avenue. It is anticipated that noise levels will temporarily increase locally during project construction but are expected to return to normal levels following project completion. Construction noise levels and types typical of construction equipment will occur as a result of this project. Construction noise will be limited to daytime hours consistent with the City of Monticello's construction working hours (7 a.m. to 7 p.m. Monday -Saturday). Construction noise will be consistent with the City of Monticello's noise ordinances (85 decibels, 7 a.m. to 10 p.m. daily). Construction equipment will be fitted with mufflers that would be maintained throughout the construction process. Table 13 summarizes the peak noise levels of common types of roadway construction equipment. Table 13. Typical Roadway Construction Equipment Noise Levels at 50 Feet Manufacturers Total Number of Peak Noise Level Equipment Type Sampled Models in Sample Range Average Backhoe 5 6 74-92 83 Front Loader 5 30 75-96 85 Dozer 8 41 65-95 85 Grader 3 15 72-92 84 Scraper 2 27 76-98 87 Pile Driver N/A N/A 95-105 101 Source: United States Environmental Protection Agency and Federal Highway Administration page 25 There are no sensitive receptors (such as hospitals) near the site which raise special concerns for further study. 18. Transportation a. Describe traffic -related aspects of project construction and operation. Include: 1) existing and proposed additional parking spaces, 2) estimated total average daily traffic generated, 3) estimated maximum peak hour traffic generated and time of occurrence, 4) indicate source of trip generation rates used in the estimates, and 5) availability of transit and/or other alternative transportation modes. See response under Section 18c and attached traffic study (Appendix Q. b. Discuss the effect on traffic congestion on affected roads and describe any traffic improvements necessary. The analysis must discuss the project's impact on the regional transportation system. If the peak hour traffic generated exceeds 250 vehicles or the total daily trips exceeds 2,500, a traffic impact study must be prepared as part of the EA W. Use the format and procedures described in the Minnesota Department of Transportation's Access Management Manual, Chapter 5 (available at. http://www.dot.state.mn.us/accessmanagementlresources.html) or a similar local guidance, See response under Section 18c and attached traffic study (Appendix Q. c. Identify measures that will be taken to minimize or mitigate project related transportation effects. The proposed Haven Ridge residential development includes 279 single family home units and 76 townhome units. The project will also include new infrastructure, such as gas, electric, telecommunications, sanitary sewer, storm sewer, watermain, streets, stormwater ponds, parking, sidewalks, trails, and streets. The project will be completed in phases with the first two phases anticipated to be completed by 2020 and the remainder as market conditions dictate. The existing site is 217 acres of primarily farmland (agricultural) located in Monticello Township (the site is proposed to be annexed into the City of Monticello with the approval of the project). The site is located from Edmonson Avenue NE to west of Fenning Avenue and north and south of 851h Street NE. The project area is bordered to the northwest by residential development, to the south by a public waters wetland, and to the west and east by farmland with scattered rural homesteads. Figures 1-4, Appendix A shows the project location and existing site plan. The estimated trip generation from the proposed Haven Ridge development is shown below in Table 14. The trip generation used to estimate the proposed site traffic is also based on rates for other similar land uses as documented in the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition. The table shows the daily, AM peak hour, and PM peak hour trip generation for the proposed site development. page 26 Table 14. Estimated Development Site Trip Generation Use Size ADT AM Peak PM Peak Total In Out Total F In I Out Total In I Out Single Family Town Homes 81 units 16 units 764 118 382 59 382 59 60 8 15 2 45 6 80 9 50 6 30 3 Total Phase 1 3192 1596 1596 243 60 183 319 201 118 and Phase 2 882 441 441 68 17 51 89 56 33 Single Family 198 units 1870 935 935 147 37 110 196 123 73 Town Homes 60 units 440 220 220 28 6 22 34 22 12 Total Phase 3 2310 1155 1155 175 43 132 230 145 1 85 Total New Trips 3192 1596 1596 243 60 183 319 201 118 Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition A Traffic Study was completed for the proposed Haven Ridge development. This study provides a comprehensive review of anticipated traffic impacts for the regional area, including the area surrounding the proposed development. The Traffic Study identifies recommended mitigation improvements at three intersections by 2030 in addition to the plan site improvement. These recommendations include: 1. Phase 1 and Phase 2 can be developed without any operational improvements (i.e., additional lanes, roundabouts, traffic signals) to the adjacent roadways or intersections studied. The adjacent street access locations should be constructed to City standards. 2. Improve Fallon Avenue to City standards from School Boulevard to 85th Street with the construction of Phase 1 and 2 of the development and 85th Street from Fallon Avenue to City limits with the completion of the future phases of the development. When determining the improvement needs (i.e., rural vs urban) the safety and drainage of the roadway should be considered. 3. By 2030 consider the construction of a traffic signal system or roundabout at the intersection of Edmonson Avenue at School Boulevard. 4. By 2030 consider the construction of a traffic signal system or roundabout at the intersection of Fenning Avenue at School Boulevard. It is understood that Wright County plans to take jurisdiction over Fenning Avenue in the next two to three years. The Traffic Study is included to respond to Item 18 of this EAW in Appendix C. page 27 19. Cumulative potential effects: (Preparers can leave this item blank if cumulative potential effects are addressed under the applicable EAW Items) a. Describe the geographic scales and timeframes of the project related environmental effects that could combine with other environmental effects resulting in cumulative potential effects. Development is anticipated to begin in 2019. No other development projects are known in the surrounding area that would interact with this project. Cumulative environmental effects from this development will not occur. b. Describe any reasonably foreseeable future projects (for which a basis of expectation has been laid) that may interact with environmental effects of the proposed project within the geographic scales and timeframes identified above. The City is not currently aware of any other specific foreseeable future projects that would result in cumulative effects from this development. There has been some interest in development adjacent to this site, but no specific projects or project proposers have been identified. c. Discuss the nature of the cumulative potential effects and summarize any other available information relevant to determining whether there is potential for significant environmental effects due to these cumulative effects. There are no know cumulative potential effects associated with this project. 20. Other potential environmental effects: If the project may cause any additional environmental effects not addressed by items 1 to 19, describe the effects here, discuss the how the environment will be affected, and identify measures that will be taken to minimize and mitigate these effects. No other potential environmental effects have been identified at this time. RGU CERTIFICATION. (The Environmental Quality Board will only accept SIGNED Environmental Assessment Worksheets for public notice in the EQB Monitor) I hereby certify that: • The information contained in this document is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. • The EAW describes the complete project; there are no other projects, stages or components other than those described in this document, which are related to the project as connected actions or phased actions, as defined at Minnesota Rules, parts 4410.0200, subparts 9c and 60, respectively. • Copies of this EAW are being sent to the entire EQB distribution list. Signature Title Date page 28 Appendix A: Figures I c MorrisonMora T I I r Kanabec Pine IA ti _ (238 _ _—_—_—_—_— /'• j I Mille -,Lacs 3 \ I a T Benton �o Forex Albany u a I r o o o Coll evllle L\ x - - pnrn etor Cambridge r St Joseph - 3t ------ Isan :i L n Stearns a shernem- 15: Nato -1 0I R kvtlle c d J ,<, Sherburne a Fir- , ----- l 'U Becker St Francis I 22 55 - f "\�� `��onficello ` =-- Elk Rivel - Annandale Anoka �.I Ramsey Andover n\ j Maple Lake `{ �_ I Str�+ice'•- tv� ^� Anoka t \\ o Lak 1+t Wright Buffalo Chai��n Coon Rapids Blaine �� q — \ J ., Maple Grove Brooklynt'ark I View I 4Mn y ok ato /.ockford � I �� _ I ,: 1.. Howard Lake=-= Montrose _ t{' - + I De l Ino'--- ',: Henne in ! Ramsey _—_—_—_ I = Minn ejlpolis WVins: ad Watertown Mound tnnetst Paulo a � -�--- I Minnetrista I I I +r _—_—_— HutchinsonItis g angora c—_—_—_—_—_—_— He ` - FZ chfield % 1-- _ � t Victoria I ._ Ede i r Waconia I _--. _ ren Griz I rl ei9 hill McLeod Carver Eagan '1 , B oomyJton v Glencoe - _ j + - Burmville \- L I N I Apple Valley yI ------a � _ t Prior Lake LI Dak � r f ! _ Jordan 'S Ott y Imo' L--- t County Boundaries Sible lelle Plaine Arlington * Project Location (217 ac.) I Figure 1:Project Location Tr, or - N County Location A Monticello —� Haven Ridge Development EAW o 10 WSB City of Monticello, MN Miles 1 inch = 10 miles Figure 2:Project Location USGS Topographic Map N A Monticello Haven Ridge Development EAW o 800 WSB mm= Feet City Of Monticello, MN 1 inch = 2,0 t feet J Fallon'DrY�-+; Z k i "' w '!"' T Mallard La eo o�gG 3 Diamond Dr 0 .m ul M 9<� st *r:. Y 4e ip d r:w :5te•� ' O� LL 'L►► IML- I ' � � I � Vf '0 'PAM ------------- moo. o ® �p yo0ov0o 000000000 0b z �o ado �P o �©�P� �•� �.. � i►�© 4p0 Opo 0>� £o v©©oopp© ©p© z W ma W � ti I. I = Project Area (217 ac) rf riliiiirivi': w• w \ \ \ nn�lrinnl CITY OF MONTICELLO \«\\w \ R1 RESIDENTIAL -� i�r I S I i i I I S/\��a• DISTRICT �� \�1 L1 -,CNE J AL1 .nt IC c I I � nl ^I n rni I -1,�s S V-^.RCOSS1N \i r' _I1n TION' - - J — — I yV�V1Y —� - - CRCsS,N ; I . R- A R!< _ U -L— -- — FUTURE 1 1 PHASE I TOWNSHIP :SERVE 1 I I I. I PHASE 1 ' r \ ter. 0 0 3 �--------------------- fAff r-� L_1 C_I ' I - I I — % I _ I FUTURE _� '"° �— ----- ---J \` PHASE Figure 4b:Site Plan CITY OF Monticello Haven Ridge Development EAW N0 City of Monticello, MN A I" Project Area (217 ac) I A 650 WSB Feet 1 inch = 650 feet MONTR URI AGR v 0 0 v N I� lJ W a � me' l II fD a � w �--------------------- fAff r-� L_1 C_I ' I - I I — % I _ I FUTURE _� '"° �— ----- ---J \` PHASE Figure 4b:Site Plan CITY OF Monticello Haven Ridge Development EAW N0 City of Monticello, MN A I" Project Area (217 ac) I A 650 WSB Feet 1 inch = 650 feet m n 85th St NE FW— L J CityBoundary MProject Area (217 ac.) = Parcels Zoning Classification R-1 (Low Residential Densities) R-3 (High Residential Densities) M -H R-3 (High Residential Densities) General Agriculture CITY OF Figure 7:Existing Zoning N - AW nticello Haven Ridge Development EAWWSB o soo City of Monticello, MN mmmmmmE==== Feet 1 inch = 800 feet ,976 13776 375 ,94' 375 1975 13770 375 13776 1975 1377C 1975 406 1942 1975 ,366 774 `" 114 11 la - � ,'ti l'r rar ra .108713+, ..�(y Lam;:�� %`W r i'm 'r ;o" 43 �rtI I tie / 13776 1942 375 1975 13776 375 1S79B 260 260 1110 375 1942 239 1288 1975 1288 260 1S77C R75 W right County Soil Survey Map Symbol Soil Name Percent Slape 1037 Eckvoll loamv fine sand, map >25, Oto 3 percent slopes 0% to 3% 30602 Lester loam, 6 to 12 perce rt slopes, eroded 6% o12% I 106D2 Lesterloam, 12to 18 percent slopes, eroded 12%to18% ra 11 1080 Klossner, Okoboli, and Glencoe soils, Ponded, O to 1 percent slopes 0%t01% � 109 Card— clay loam, 0 to 2 percent slope, 0% to 2% 1110 Isan sandy loam, Oto 2 percent slopes 0% to - 114 Glencoe clay loam, depressional, Oto 1 percent slopes 0%'O1% 11C.VUU 1224 Hubbard-Verndale, acid substratum, complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes 0% to 3% 13626 Angus loam, I to I Pe— nit sI,P,s 2%to 5% r 1368 Southhaven loam, Oto 2 percent slopes 0% to 2% 13776 Dorset -Two Inlets complex, 2 to 6 percent slopes 2% to 6% I 13770 Dorset -Two Inlets complex, 6to 12 percent slopes 6% to 12% I 13796 Dorset -Al mora complex, 1to4 percent slopes 1% to 4% a 13886 Terri loam, moderately wet. 2 to 6 percent slopes 2%t06% tn•AA1L=/ 14380 graham loamyfine sand, moderately wet, 2to 5percent slopes 2%to 5% 19016 Angus -Le Sueur complex, l to 5percent slopes 1%to 5% 1942 Forada mucky loam, de pressi—al, 0 to 1 percent slaces 0% to 1% 1975 Oylen sandy loam, O to 2 percent slopes 0% to 2% 260 Duelm loamVsand, Oto 2 percentslopes 0%'02% I 375 Forret am,sandy tot percent slopes 0% to 2% MAZI I 406 Dorset sand, to a m, Ot02tslopeslOpes 0% to 2% 441 Aimam am,Oto2percent slopes 0%to 2% W Water lA A 1.K3 L V'a.. IL I Figure 8:Soil Survey of ACITY OF Wright County Monticello Haven Ridge Development EAW City of Monticello, MN 945D2 VCM02 �12 7203 = Project Area (217 ac.) Erodible Soil Classification Wright County Soil Survey Highly Erodible Land Potential Highly Erodible Land N A 0 900 WSB Feet 1 inch = 900 feet Figure 9:Surface Water rUITY OFResources N A M'Ont�CCnO Haven Ridge Development EAW o 2,000 WSB Feet City Of Monticello, MN 1 inch = 2,000 feet 00184701 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1: 1 � 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 0065097 (-1 ♦ Ir 00752572 00597486 10Od 764 ■ 00609694 1 ` 1 1 ` 1 1 ` 1 ♦ 1 ♦ 1 / 1 00136613% 1 � - 1 • 1 � 36 / 1 707 1 / 00523950 C �. 1 1 1 00662223 Ii— — —- ——— —-—— — — —— — -- 00789748 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Project Area (217 ac.) 500Ft Buffer 1 Wells DNR Depth to Water Table - ; Depth (ft.) 00-10 00488359 00574794 I 0 >10-20 >20-30 >30-40 >40-50 >50 water J Figure 10:Well Locations I TY or and Groundwater Resources N A 'OntiCCnO Haven Ridge Development EAW 0 1,000 WSB Feet City Of Monticello, MN 1 inch = 1,000 feet v A D J • ` ■ 37Z7* 136269 054 6277 F z ` ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ ■ ■ ■ ■7 130 35957 446. 217032 - r MUM ■ ■ 53398 - ■ . ■ 16608 ■ � 58100 ■ ■ ❑ ■ ■ ■ ■�� Project Area (217 ac.) ■ • L■■! • / ■ 500Ft Buffer ♦♦♦♦ • ■ ■ • • • • • � • • • •v♦• ■. �♦ ♦♦ ❑ What's Feedlot Neighborhood Results ■ ■ E Hazardous Waste t' G) Multiple Activities ti Monticello Figure 11:Potential Contamination Areas N Haven Ridge Development EAW 0 City of Monticello, MN A I 1 inch = 800 feet 800 = Feet A WSB 3 v V d n k 85th St NE Diamond Dr Park Dr s -s a'Ave m T 4 = rs 4 0 A = Project Area (217 ac.) Minnesota Land Cover Classification System Impervious Surface M Cropland _ Wooded/Forest Wetland Brush/Grassland MEW] Deep Water/Streams Figure 12:Minnesota Land Cover (� T Classification System (MLCCS) N A Monticello Haven Ridge Development EAW 0 800 WSB iJ Cit of Monticello, MN Feet City 1 inch = 800 feet r, 10 116-4 Cobble 5<°�gG f c� 3 Diamond Dr O V Park Dr sf , I Y aa'Ave � s c n u m m W Z d Q U) m ww� 79th St NE Project Area (217 ac.) O SHPO archaeological site (approximate location) (� T Figure 13: Historical Sites N A Monticello Haven Ridge Development EAW 0 800 WSB iJ Cit of Monticello, MN Feet City 1 inch = 800 feet Appendix B: Agency Correspondence Laura Wehr From: MN_MNIT_Data Request SHPO <DataReq uestSHPO@state.mn.us> Sent: Friday, August 17, 2018 3:50 PM To: Laura Wehr Subject: RE: Data Request Monticello Township, Wright County Attachments: WrightArchaeology.xls THIS EMAIL IS NOT A PROJECT CLEARANCE This information has recently been updated, please read the note below carefully. This message simply reports the results of the cultural resources database search you requested. The database search produced results for only previously known archaeological sites and historic properties. No historic structures were identified in a search of the Minnesota Archaeological Inventory and Historic and Architectural Inventory for the search area requested. A report containing the archaeological sites identified is attached. The result of this database search provides a listing of recorded archaeological sites and historic/architectural properties that are included in the current MN SHPO databases. Because the majority of archaeological sites in the state and many historic/architectural properties have not been recorded, important sites or properties may exist within the search area and may be affected by development projects within that area. Additional research, including field survey, may be necessary to adequately assess the area's potential to contain historic properties. Properties that are listed in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) or have been determined eligible for listing in the NRHP are indicated on the reports you have received. The following codes on the reports you received are: NR - National Register listed. The properties may be individually listed or may be within the boundaries of a National Register District. CEF - Considered Eligible Findings are made when a federal agency has recommended that a property is eligible for listing in the National Register and MN SHPO has accepted the recommendation for the purposes of the Review and Compliance Process. There properties need to be further assessed before they are officially listed in the National Register. SEF - Staff eligible Findings are those properties the MN SHPO staff considers eligible for listing in the National Register, in circumstances other than the Review and Compliance process. I DOE - Determination of Eligibility is made by the National Park Service and are those properties that are eligible for listing in the National Register, but have not been officially listed. CNEF - Considered Not Eligible Findings are made during the course of a Review and Compliance process. For the purposes of the review a property is considered not eligible for listing in the National Register. These properties may need to be reassessed for eligibility under additional or alternate contexts. Properties without NR, CEF, SEF, DOE, or CNEF designations in the reports you received may not have been evaluated and therefore no assumption to their eligibility can be made. Integrity and contexts change over time, therefore any eligibility determination made ten (10) or more years for the date of the current survey are considered out of date and the property will need to be reassessed. If you require a comprehensive assessment of a project's potential to impact archaeological sites or historic/architectural properties, you may need to hire a qualified archaeologist and/or historian. If you need assistance with a project review, please contact Kelly Gragg-Johnson in Review and Compliance @ 651-201-3285 or by email at kelly.araaaiohnson(cbstate.mn.us. The Minnesota SHPO Survey Manuals and Database Metadata can be found at httDS://mn.ciov/admin/shoo/identification-evaluation/ MN SHPO research hours are 8:30 AM - 4:00 PM Tuesday -Friday. Please call ahead at 651- 201-3295 to ensure staff is available to assist you, if necessary. The Office is closed on Mondays. DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION STATE t.-SrORIc PR, :E n+ATiON CF= C'_ SHPO Data Requests Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office 50 Sherburne Avenue, Suite 203 Saint Paul, MN 55155 (651) 201-3295 datarequestshi)o(a�state.mn.us From: Laura Wehr <Iwehr@wsbeng.com> Sent: Monday, August 13, 2018 8:25 AM To: MN_MNIT_Data Request SHPO <DataReq uestSHPO@state.mn.us> Subject: Data Request Monticello Township, Wright County Hello, Could you please send me any historical information for the area within and around a project site in the Monticello Township, Wright County? Attached are two location maps. The project area is in 523, 524, and S26 of T121, R25. Thank you, Laura Wehr Environmental Scientist P (763) 762-28331 M (612) 749-5816 WSB & Associates, Inc. 1 701 Xenia Avenue South, Suite 300 1 Minneapolis, MN 55416 �AL !--HO4T - This email, and any files transmitted with it, is confidential and is intended solely for the use of the addressee. If you are not the addressee, please delete this email from your system. Any use of this email by unintended recipients is strictly prohibited. WSB does not accept liability for any errors or omissions which arise as a result of electronic transmission. If verification is required, please request a hard copy. Appendix C: Traffic Impact Study TY -`a Monticeflo HAVEN RIDGE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC STUDY MONTICELLO, MN September 14, 2018 Prepared for: City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street Monticello, MN 55362 WSB PROJECT NO. 12471-000 Haven Ridge Development Traffic Study For: 74 k Monticello City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street Monticello, MN 55362 September 14, 2018 Prepared By: WSB & Associates, Inc. 701 Xenia Ave. South, Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN, 55416 (763) 541-4800 (763) 541-1700 (Fax) HAVEN RIDGE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC STUDY CITY OF MONTICELLO WSB PROJECT NO. 12471-000 CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly registered professional engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Charles T. Rickart, P.E. Date: September 14, 2018 Reg. No. 26082 HAVEN RIDGE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC STUDY CITY OF MONTICELLO WSB PROJECT NO. 12471-000 PAGE Table of Contents INTRODUCTION / BACKGROUND................................................................................3 EXISTING CONDITIONS................................................................................................ 6 TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS.............................................................................................. 9 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS.....................................................................................17 CONCLUSIONS / RECOMMENDATIONS................................................................... 22 Figures / Tables Figure1 - Location Map................................................................................................4 Figure 2 — Haven Ridge Site Plan................................................................................. 5 Figure 3 — Existing AM and PM Peak Hour Traffic ...................................................... 8 Figure 4 — No -Build 2020 AM and PM Peak Hour Traffic .......................................... 11 Figure 5 — No -Build 2030 AM and PM Peak Hour Traffic .......................................... 12 Figure 6 — Build 2020 AM and PM Peak Hour Traffic ........................................... 13,14 Figure 7 — Build 2030 AM and PM Peak Hour Traffic ........................................... 15,16 Figure 8 — Level of Service Ranges........................................................................... 17 Table 1 — Site Development Traffic Generation........................................................ 10 Table 2 — Existing Level of Service Summary.......................................................... 19 Table 3 — 2020 No -Build Level of Service Summary ................................................. 19 Table 4 — 2030 No Build Level of Service Summary ................................................. 20 Table 5 — 2020 Build Level of Service Summary ...................................................... 20 Table 6 — 2030 Build Level of Service Summary ...................................................... 21 HAVEN RIDGE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC STUDY CITY OF MONTICELLO WSB PROJECT NO. 12471-000 PAGE ii INTRODUCTION / BACKGROUND The purpose of this study is to determine the potential traffic impacts the proposed Haven Ridge residential development will have on the adjacent roadway system. The existing 217 -acre site is located in Monticello Township and is proposed to be annexed into the City of Monticello with the approval of the project. The site is located from Edmonson Avenue NE to west of Fenning Avenue and north and south of 85th Street NE. The project location is shown on Figure 1. The proposed Haven Ridge residential development includes 279 single family home units and 76 townhome units. The project will also include new infrastructure, such as gas, electric, telecommunications, sanitary sewer, storm sewer, water, streets, stormwater ponds, parking, sidewalks, trails, and streets. The project will be completed in phases with the first two phases anticipated to be completed by 2020 and the remainder as market conditions dictate. The proposed site plan is shown in Figure 2. The traffic impacts of the existing roadway system and proposed development were evaluated at the following locations. • Edmonson Ave at School Blvd • Edmonson Ave at 85th St • Edmonson Ave at Site Entrance (with development) • Edmonson Ave at CR 37 • Fallon Ave at School Blvd • Fallon Ave at Farmstead Ave / Site Entrance (with development) • Fallon Ave at 87th St / Site Entrance (with development) • Fallon Ave at Townhome Site Entrance (with development) • Fallon Ave / Eisele Ave south at 85th St / Site Entrance (with development) • 85th St at Eisele Ave north / Site Entrance (with development) • 85th St at Site Entrance (with development) • Fenning Ave at School Blvd • Fenning Ave at 85th St The following sections of this report document the analysis and anticipated impacts of the proposed Meadows North development. HAVEN RIDGE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC STUDY CITY OF MONTICELLO WSB PROJECT NO. 12471-000 PAGE 3 SCALE IN FEET 0 1000 20& - .rte i,� ''� +. "�-• � �,�� IYf[RS1+T[ R 39 ■ re. --�—'� � ,"' • �' �' ori Sd � � _ School Boulevard 25 _:-. _"�,_J !! � _ -f �-s�--•:�� 118 a -0 -� ps_ .�a� . •• .yam. .��1 °Qce•. € .Project Location CITY OF Haven Ridge Development ! !iffic Study Figure I -A � It pool8oulmrd Pebblebrook Dc ' y d + f 1 . i ''r i� ► ' t! Stading Dr, 1 �• �• ...moi-L.a � '"��' ti ,. :r � i' ' c t. I s 4 w t ) .- 14, 65th St NE 11110 GC11GGm.�a -/ , oafMg. 50dF oo�d O00A 1� E moo' 4qp a QOvo.sd 4 OQ�o �.'� Q•aw aQ od 7 Q a vac 79th St NE r '_ � w0 4t, 87th St RR, ";,j4O MilM"� 4.►_ VIP E 65th St NE 11110 GC11GGm.�a -/ , oafMg. 50dF oo�d O00A 1� E moo' 4qp a QOvo.sd 4 OQ�o �.'� Q•aw aQ od 7 Q a vac 79th St NE EXISTING CONDITIONS A. Roadway Characteristics School Boulevard: School Boulevard is an east/west City of Monticello 2 -lane Major Collector roadway. Left and/or right turn lanes are provided at most intersections. The posted speed limit on School Boulevard is 40 mph. The existing 2017 Average Daily Traffic (ADT) on School Boulevard ranges from 6,000 vehicles per day (vpd) west of Fallon Avenue to 6,800 vpd east of Fallon Avenue. Edmonson Avenue (CR 117): Edmonson Avenue is a north/south 2 -lane local roadway. The City has jurisdiction within city limits north of 87th Street NE with Monticello Township having jurisdiction south of 87th St NE. Primary access on Edmonson Avenue in the area adjacent to the site is from local streets and driveways. The posted speed limit on Edmonson Avenue is 45 mph north of 85th Street and 55 mph south of 85th Street. The existing 2017 ADT on Edmonson Avenue ranges from 2,400vpd north of 85th Street to 2,250vpd south of 85th Avenue. Fallon Avenue: Fallon Avenue is a north/south 2 -lane local City street. Fallon Avenue south of School Boulevard to the City limits has a posted 30 mph speed limit. South of the City limit the roadway narrows to a 22 -foot width with no posted speed limit (assumed to be 55 mph). Fallon Avenue ends where it turns on 85th Street. The existing 2017 ADT on Fallon Avenue is 1,100vpd south of School Boulevard. Fallon Avenue received a bituminous overlay in 2015. 85th Street: 85th Street is an east/west 2 -lane local township and city street. Monticello Township has jurisdiction of 85th Street between Edmonson Avenue and Eisele Ave NE and the City has jurisdiction of 85th Street between Eisele Ave and Fallon Avenue within City Limits. It is understood that the current Township jurisdiction of 85th Street will become the City's with the annexation approval. 85th Street ends where it turns on Fallon Avenue. The existing 2017 ADT on 85th Street is 910vpd east of Edmonson Avenue. 85th Street, within the City limits, received a bituminous overlay in 2015. The lane configurations at each of the primary intersections is outlined below. Edmonson Ave at School Blvd — All Way Stop Control SB Edmonson Ave — one left/through/right WB School Blvd — one left, one through/right NB Edmonson Ave — one left/through/right EB School Blvd — one left, one through/right Edmonson Ave at 85th St - Side Street Stop Control SB Edmonson Ave — one right/through/left WB 85th St — one right/through/left NB Edmonson Ave - one right/through/left EB 85th St — one right/through/left HAVEN RIDGE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC STUDY CITY OF MONTICELLO WSB PROJECT NO. 12471-000 PAGE 6 Edmonson Ave at CR 37 - Side Street Stop Control SB Edmonson Ave — one right/through/left WB CR 37 — one by-pass lane, one through/left NB Edmonson Ave - one right/through/left EB CR 37 — one right, one through/left Fallon Ave at School Blvd — All Way Stop Control SB Fallon Ave — one left/through/right WB School Blvd — one left, one through/right NB Fallon Ave — one left/through/right EB School Blvd — one left, one through/right Fenning Ave at School Blvd/CR 18 (Jason Avenue) — All Way Stop Control SB Fenning Ave — one left/through, one right WB CR 18 — one left/through, one right NB Fenning Ave — one left/through/right EB School Blvd — one left, one through/right Fenning Ave at 8511 St - Side Street Stop Control SB Fenning Ave — one right/through/left NB Fenning Ave - one right/through/left EB 85th St — one right/through/left The existing roadway geometrics including the intersection traffic control, is shown on Figure 3. B. Traffic Volumes Traffic volume data was obtained from the City of Monticello and Wright County along with traffic counts conducted by WSB & Associates, Inc. during the week of August 131h, 2018. Traffic volume data was collected for the Average Daily Traffic, AM peak hour and PM peak hour. The existing 2018 average daily traffic volume and 2018 peak hour counts are illustrated on Figure 3. HAVEN RIDGE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC STUDY CITY OF MONTICELLO WSB PROJECT NO. 12471-000 PAGE 7 1 2018 Existing ADT Lane Configuration .irning Movement Volume Stop -Controlled Approach . Haven Ridge Development EAW Figure 3 IWSB MOT1t1Cell0 Traffic Study 2018 Existing Volumes City of Monticello HAVEN RIDGE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC STUDY CITY OF MONTICELLO WSB PROJECT NO. 12471-000 PAGE 8 TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS In order to analyze the lane configuration and traffic control needs projected traffic volumes were determined for the area. Traffic forecasts were prepared for the year 2020 which is the year after the proposed first two phases of the development are anticipated to be completed and; for the 2030 conditions which represents the full build condition of the site. The following sections outline the traffic generation, as well as the traffic distribution and projected traffic volumes. A. Background (Non -Development) Traffic Growth Traffic growth in the vicinity of a proposed site will occur between existing conditions (2018) and any given future year due to other development within the region. This background growth must be accounted for and included in future year traffic forecasts. Reviewing the historical traffic counts in the area, traffic has stayed somewhat constant or dropped in the past few years. The current County State Aid traffic projection factor is 1.5 over a 20 -year period. This factor was used to project traffic to the 2020 and 2030 analysis years. This represents approximately a 2%/year growth. The traffic changes as the result of the new Fallon Avenue overpass will not have significant impacts on the intersections adjacent to the proposed development. In this case the future traffic volumes would not change or would be slightly reduced. Therefore, the analysis would be considered a worst-case condition. B. Proposed Site Trip Generation The estimated trip generation from the proposed Haven Ridge development project is shown below in Table 1. The trip generation used to estimate the proposed site traffic is based on rates for other similar land uses as documented in the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, 1011 Edition. The table shows the daily, AM peak hour and PM peak hour trip generation for the proposed site development. C. Traffic Distribution Site -generated trips were distributed to the adjacent roadway system based on the anticipated origins and destinations for specific land use and existing travel patterns. The generated trips for the proposed Haven Ridge development were assumed to arrive or exit the site using new access locations on Fallon Avenue for phase 1 and 2 and on Fallon Avenue, 851h Street and Edmonson Avenue at full development. Based on these parameters the following general traffic distribution was used to distribute the projected traffic volumes from the anticipated uses: • 80% to/from the north • 5% to/from the east • 5% to/from the south • 10% to/from the west HAVEN RIDGE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC STUDY CITY OF MONTICELLO WSB PROJECT NO. 12471-000 PAGE 9 D. Projected Traffic Volumes The traffic forecasts were prepared by adding the projected annual background traffic growth to the existing 2018 traffic counts to determine the "No -Build" traffic conditions. The anticipated site development traffic was then added to the no -build to determine the "Build" traffic conditions. Figures 4-7 shows the projected 2020 and 2030 No - Build and Build AM peak hour and PM peak hour traffic volumes. Table 1 - Develoament Site Trio Generation Use Size ADT AM Peak PM Peak Total In Out Total T17n Out Total In Out Single Family 81 units 764 382 382 60 15 45 80 50 30 Town Homes 16 units 118 59 59 8 2 6 9 6 3 Total Phase 1 and Phase 2 882 441 441 68 17 51 89 56 33 Single Family 198 units 1870 935 935 147 37 110 196 123 73 Town Homes 60 units 440 220 220 28 6 22 34 22 12 Total Phase 3 2310 1155 1155 1 175 43 1 132 230 145 85 Total New Trips 3192 1596 1596 1 243 60 183 1 319 201 118 Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition HAVEN RIDGE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC STUDY CITY OF MONTICELLO WSB PROJECT NO. 12471-000 PAGE 10 1 2020 No Build ADT Lane Configuration AM (PM) Turning Movement Volume 0 Stop -Controlled Approach Haven Ridge Development EAW Figure 4 WSBz M0j1t Cll0 Traffic Study 2020 No Build Volumes City of Monticello HAVEN RIDGE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC STUDY CITY OF MONTICELLO WSB PROJECT NO. 12471-000 PAGE 11 1 2030 No Build ADT Lane Configuration AM (PM) Turning Movement Volume Stop -Controlled Approach . Haven Ridge Development EAW Figure 5 WSB MOntlCellO Traffic Study 2030 No Build Volumes City of Monticello HAVEN RIDGE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC STUDY CITY OF MONTICELLO WSB PROJECT NO. 12471-000 PAGE 12 a HIS d -- GIs y hoot Blvd sots h C" y®�1 STOP 11 o STnP o STOP v m 7 I Q Q C C O 0 4L 21103T) LL L. W N 1 1 (321)164 (20)20 144)27 C 85th St 37(24) NF W��yGc:�o oo�ao��oo aap ' i o4?pip. p00p, g mac,• � ��V� - - a(60)16 'a o 25(14) y (5)22 A 117 couNTr � �" p fig] LEGEND N XX 2020 Build ADT 71 t F Lane Configuration {16)37 y AM (PM) Turning Movement Volume I' aStop -Controlled Approach . Haven Ridge Development EAW Figure Ga CITY OF WSB MOntlCello Traffic Study Existing Intersections City of Monticello 2020 Build Volumes HAVEN RIDGE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC STUDY CITY OF MONTICELLO WSB PROJECT NO. 12471-000 PAGE 13 Lane Configuration AM (PM) Turning Movement Volume 10 Stop -Controlled Approach . pa, Haven Ridge Development EAW Figure 6b CITY�OF IWSB '�' MOI1t1Cell0 Traffic Study New Intersections City of Monticello 2020 Build Volumes HAVEN RIDGE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC STUDY CITY OF MONTICELLO WSB PROJECT NO. 12471-000 PAGE 14 1 2030 Build ADT Lane Configuration AM (PM) Turning Movement Volume 0 Stop -Controlled Approach . Haven Ridge Development EAW Figure 7a (ITY (lF ii�iSB MOT1t1Cell0 Traffic Study Existing Intersections City of Monticello 2030 Build Volumes HAVEN RIDGE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC STUDY CITY OF MONTICELLO WSB PROJECT NO. 12471-000 PAGE 15 . CIHaven Ridge Development EAW Figure 7b TY llF WSB MOntlC (o Traffic Study New Intersections City of Monticello 2030 Build Volumes HAVEN RIDGE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC STUDY CITY OF MONTICELLO WSB PROJECT NO. 12471-000 PAGE 16 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Existing and/or forecasted traffic operations were evaluated for the key impacted intersections adjacent to the proposed site. This section describes the methodology used to assess the operations and provides a summary of traffic operations for each analysis year. A. Methodology The traffic operations analysis is derived from established methodologies documented in the Highway Capacity Manual 2000 (HCM). The HCM provides a series of analysis techniques that are used to evaluate traffic operations. Intersections are given a Level of Service (LOS) grade from "A" to "F" to describe the average amount of control delay per vehicle as defined in the HCM. The LOS is primarily a function of peak traffic hour turning movement volumes, intersection lane configuration, and the traffic controls at the intersection. LOS A is the best traffic operating condition, and drivers experience minimal delay at an intersection operating at that level. LOS E represents the condition where the intersection is at capacity. LOS F represents a condition where there is more traffic than can be handled by the intersection, and many vehicle operators may have to wait through more than one green phase to make it through the intersection. At a stop sign -controlled intersection, LOS F would be characterized by exceptionally long vehicle queues on each approach at an all -way stop, or long queues and/or great difficulty in finding an acceptable gap for drivers on the minor legs at a through -street intersection. The LOS ranges for both signalized and un -signalized intersections are shown in Figure 8. The threshold LOS values for un -signalized intersections are slightly less than for signalized intersections. This variance was instituted because drivers' expectations at intersections differ with the type of traffic control. A given LOS can be altered by increasing (or decreasing) the number of lanes, changing traffic control arrangements, adjusting the timing at signalized intersections, or other lesser geometric improvements. LOS also changes as traffic volumes increase or decrease. Figure 8 - Level of Service Ranges for Signalized and Un -signalized Intersections _ u 80 v d u LOS E ^ t d 55 ° °1 d ° s 50 a LOS D > -o a LOS E 35 y a 35 a LOS C o LOS D a 5 25 20 5 `o LOS C LOS B Z 15 U 10 0 10 LOS B - LOS A LOSA LOS Z Signalized Intersection Unsignalized Intersection SOURCE- Level of Service IM1resM1olds from tM1e HigM1way Capacity Manual, 2000 HAVEN RIDGE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC STUDY CITY OF MONTICELLO WSB PROJECT NO. 12471-000 PAGE 17 LOS, as described above, can also be determined for the individual legs (sometimes referred to as "approaches") or lanes (turn lanes in particular) of an intersection. It should be noted that a LOS E or F might be acceptable or justified in those cases where a leg(s) or lane(s) has a very low traffic volume as compared to the volume on the other legs. For example, improving LOS on such low-volume legs by converting a two-way stop condition to an all -way stop, or adjusting timing at a signalized intersection, could result in a significant penalty for the many drivers on the major road while benefiting the few on the minor road. Also, geometric improvements on minor legs, such as additional lanes or longer turn lanes, could have limited positive effects and might be prohibitive in terms of benefit to cost. Although LOS A represents the best possible level of traffic flow, the cost to construct roadways and intersection to such a high standard often exceeds the benefit to the user. Funding availability might also lead to acceptance of intersection or roadway designs with a lower LOS. LOS D is generally accepted as the lowest acceptable level in urban areas. LOS C is often considered to be the desirable minimum level for rural areas. LOS D or E may be acceptable for limited durations or distances, or for very low-volume legs of some intersections. The LOS analysis was performed using Synchro/SimTraffic: Synchro, a software package that implements Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) methodologies, was used to build each signalized intersection and provide an input database for turning -movement volumes, lane geometrics, and signal design and timing characteristics. In addition, Synchro was used to optimize signal timing parameters for future conditions. Output from Synchro is transferred to SimTraffic, the traffic simulation model. SimTraffic is a micro -simulation computer modeling software that simulates each individual vehicle's characteristics and driver behavior in response to traffic volumes, intersection configuration, and signal operations. The model simulates drivers' behaviors and responses to surrounding traffic flow as well as different vehicle types and speeds. It outputs estimated vehicle delay and queue lengths at each intersection being analyzed. B. Existing Level of Service Summary Table 2, below, summarizes the existing LOS at the primary intersections in the study area based on the current lane geometry, traffic control and 2018 traffic volumes. The table shows that all intersections are operating at an overall LOS B or better during the AM and PM peak hour with all movements operating at LOS C or better. HAVEN RIDGE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC STUDY CITY OF MONTICELLO WSB PROJECT NO. 12471-000 PAGE 18 Table 2 — Existing (2018) Level of Service Edmonson Ave at School Blvd Edmonson Ave at 85th St Edmonson Ave at CR 37 Fallon Ave at School Blvd Fenning Ave at School Blvd Fenning Ave at 85th St C = Overall LOS, (D) = Worst movement LOS A (A) 9 AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Intersection A (A) 6 A(A) 5 A(B) 7 A (B) 9 A (B) LOS Delay LOS Delay A (A) 2 A (A) (sec/veh) Source: WSB & Associates, Inc. (sec/veh) Edmonson Ave at School Blvd Edmonson Ave at 85th St Edmonson Ave at CR 37 Fallon Ave at School Blvd Fenning Ave at School Blvd Fenning Ave at 85th St C = Overall LOS, (D) = Worst movement LOS A (A) 9 B (C) 14 A (A) 4 A (A) 6 A(A) 5 A(B) 7 A (B) 9 A (B) 12 A (B) 10 B (C) 14 A (A) 2 A (A) 2 Source: WSB & Associates, Inc. (sec/veh) C. Forecasted Traffic Operations A capacity and LOS analysis was completed for the study area intersections for 2020 which is the year the proposed phase 1 and phase 2 of the development would be completed and for the 2030 conditions which represents the full development of the site. The results of the analysis are discussed below and shown in Tables 3 - 6. Table 3 and Table 4 — Forecasted No Build, shows that with no site development and existing roadway geometrics and traffic control, all intersection will continue to operate at overall LOS C or better with all movements at LOS D or better in both the AM and PM peak hours in 2020 and in the AM peak hour in 2030. However, during the PM peak hour the intersections of Edmonson Avenue/Oakwood Drive at School Boulevard and Fenning Avenue at School Boulevard will begin to have operational issues requiring consideration of improvements. Table 3 — Forecasted 2020 No Build - Level of Service Edmonson Ave at School Blvd Edmonson Ave at 85' St Edmonson Ave at CR 37 Fallon Ave at School Blvd Fenning Ave at School Blvd Fenning Ave at 85" St C = Overall LOS, (D) = Worst movement LOS HAVEN RIDGE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC STUDY CITY OF MONTICELLO WSB PROJECT NO. 12471-000 A (A) 9 AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Intersection A (A) 7 A (B) 6 A (B) 7 A (B) 9 A (B) LOS Delay LOS Delay A (A) 2 A (A) (sec/veh) Source: WSB & Associates, Inc. (sec/veh) Edmonson Ave at School Blvd Edmonson Ave at 85' St Edmonson Ave at CR 37 Fallon Ave at School Blvd Fenning Ave at School Blvd Fenning Ave at 85" St C = Overall LOS, (D) = Worst movement LOS HAVEN RIDGE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC STUDY CITY OF MONTICELLO WSB PROJECT NO. 12471-000 A (A) 9 B (C) 14 A (A) 4 A (A) 7 A (B) 6 A (B) 7 A (B) 9 A (B) 12 B (C) 11 B (D) 17 A (A) 2 A (A) 3 Source: WSB & Associates, Inc. PAGE 19 Table 4 — Forecasted 2030 No Build - Level of Service Intersection Edmonson Ave at School Blvd Edmonson Ave at 85th St Edmonson Ave at CR 37 Fallon Ave at School Blvd Fenning Ave at School Blvd Fenning Ave at 85th St C = Overall LOS, (D) = Worst movement LOS AM Peak Hour LOS Delay (sec/veh) B (B) 10 A (A) 5 A (B) 6 B (B) 12 C (D) 19 A (A) 2 Source: WSB & Associates, Inc. PM Peak Hour LOS Delay (sec/veh) C (E) 23 I A (B) 7 A (C) 9 C (D) 18 E (F) 50 A (A) 3 Table 5 and Table 6 — Forecasted Build, shows that, assuming the proposed development with the exiting lane configuration and traffic control all intersection will continue to operate at overall LOS C or better with all movements at LOS D or better in both the AM and PM peak hours in 2020. However, in 2030, during the PM peak hour the intersection of Edmonson Avenue/Oakwood Drive at School Boulevard and during the AM and PM peak hours the intersection of Fenning Avenue at School Boulevard will continue to have operational issues as identified with the no -build analysis. Table 5 — Forecasted 2020 Build - Level of Service Intersection AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour LOS Delay LOS Delay (sec/veh) (sec/veh) Edmonson Ave at School Blvd A (B) 9 C (C) 15 Edmonson Ave at 85th St A (A) 4 A (A) 7 Edmonson Ave at CR 37 A (B) 6 A (B) 7 Fallon Ave at School Blvd A (B) 9 A (B) 12 Fallon Ave at Farmstead Ave/Site Entrance #1 A (A) 1 A (A) 2 Fallon Ave at 8711 St / Site Entrance #2 A (A) 2 A (A) 2 Fallon Ave at Townhome Site Entrance #3 A (A) 2 A (A) 2 Fenning Ave at School Blvd B (C) 13 C (D) 19 Fenning Ave at 85th St A (A) 2 A (A) 3 C = Overall LOS, (D) = Worst movement LOS Source: WSB & Associates, Inc HAVEN RIDGE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC STUDY CITY OF MONTICELLO WSB PROJECT NO. 12471-000 PAGE 20 Table 6 — Forecasted 2030 Build - Level of Service Intersection Edmonson Ave at School Blvd Edmonson Ave at 85th St Edmonson Ave at Site Entrance #6 Edmonson Ave at CR 37 Fallon Ave at School Blvd Fallon Ave at Farmstead Ave/Site Entrance #1 Fallon Ave at 87th St / Site Entrance #2 Fallon Ave at Townhome Site Entrance #3 Fallon Ave at 85th St (1) 85th St at Eisele Ave No / Site Entrance #4 85th St at Site Entrance #5 Fenning Ave at School Blvd Fenning Ave at 85th St AM Peak Hour I PM Peak Hour LOS Delay I LOS Delay A (A) (sec/veh) A (A) (sec/veh) B (B) 11 E (F) 49 A (A) 5 A (B) 7 A (A) 2 A (A) 5 A (C) 7 A (C) 9 B (C) 14 C (D) 22 A (A) 2 A (A) 2 A (A) 2 A (A) 2 A (A) 2 A (A) 2 A (A) 3 A (A) 4 A (A) 2 A (A) 2 A (A) 1 A (A) 1 E (F) 40 F (F) 70 A (A) 2 A (A) 3 C = Overall LOS, (D) = Worst movement LOS Source: WSB & Associates, Inc. (1) = Assumes a single lane roundabout D. Mitigation Traffic Operations Based on the traffic operation analysis the following mitigation improvements would improve the operations at the impacted intersections in the 2030 conditions with or without the proposed development. 1. Edmonson Avenue at School Boulevard - Construct a traffic signal system or single lane roundabout. The analysis concludes that with the existing lane configuration assuming the signal or roundabout improvement the overall intersection would improve to a LOS B with all movements at LOS D or better 2. Fenning Avenue at School Boulevard - Construct a traffic signal system or single lane roundabout. The analysis concludes that with the existing lane configuration assuming the signal or roundabout improvement the overall intersection would improve to a LOS C with all movements at LOS D or better It is understood that Wright County plans to take jurisdiction over Fenning Avenue in the next 2-3 years and would be completing this improvement. HAVEN RIDGE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC STUDY CITY OF MONTICELLO WSB PROJECT NO. 12471-000 PAGE 21 3. Fallon Avenue at 85th Street — Construct a single lane roundabout. The proposed concept site plan indicates a single lane roundabout to be constructed at a realign intersection providing the primary access to the future site development and providing a future connection to Fenning Avenue to the west. The improvement is needed to accommodate the anticipated site traffic. If the development was not completed, stop controlled intersections would provide sufficient operations. The proposed improvement will provide the better operations than a stop -controlled intersection. CONCLUSIONS / RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the analysis documented in this study, the following can be concluded: The proposed site will include 279 single family homes and 86 townhomes at full development. The site will be developed in phases. The first two phases are assumed to be constructed by 2020 and will include 81 single family homes and 16 townhome units which would generate approximately 882 daily trips, 68 AM peak hour trips and 89 PM peak hour trips. The remainder of the development will be constructed as the market dictates. At full build of the site the development is anticipated to generate 3,192 daily trips, 243 AM peak hour trips and 319 PM peak hour trips. • Existing (2018) traffic operations analysis, based on the current lane geometry and traffic control, indicates that all intersections are operating at an overall LOS B or better during the AM peak hour and PM peak hour with all movements operating at LOS C or better. Intersection traffic operations for the No -Build conditions shows that with no site development and existing roadway geometrics and traffic control, all intersection will continue to operate at overall LOS C or better with all movements at LOS D or better in both the AM and PM peak hours in 2020 and in the AM peak hour in 2030. However, during the PM peak hour the intersections of Edmonson Avenue at School Boulevard and Fenning Avenue at School Boulevard will begin to have operational issues requiring consideration of improvements. Intersection traffic operations for the Build conditions shows that, assuming the proposed development with the exiting lane configuration and traffic control all intersection will continue to operate at overall LOS C or better with all movements at LOS D or better in both the AM and PM peak hours in 2020. However, in 2030, during the PM peak hour the intersection of Edmonson Avenue at School Boulevard and during the AM and PM peak hours the intersection of Fenning Avenue at School Boulevard will continue to have operational issues as identified with the no -build analysis. • Based on the results of the traffic operation analysis providing improvements to the intersections of Edmondson Avenue at School Boulevard and Fenning Avenue at School Boulevard would improve the intersection and movement operations. HAVEN RIDGE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC STUDY CITY OF MONTICELLO WSB PROJECT NO. 12471-000 PAGE 22 Based on these conclusions the following is recommended for the development of the Haven Ridge site: 1. Phase 1 and Phase 2 can be developed without any operational improvements (i.e. additional turn lanes, roundabouts, traffic signals) to the adjacent roadways or intersections studied. The adjacent street access locations should be constructed to City standards. 2. Improve Fallon Avenue to City standards from School Boulevard limits to 85th Street with the construction of Phase 1 and 2 of the development, and; 85th Street from Fallon Avenue to City Limits with the completion of the future phases of the development. When determining the improvement needs (i.e. rural vs urban) the safety and drainage of the roadway should be considered. 3. By 2030 consider the construction of a traffic signal system or single lane roundabout at the intersection of Edmonson Avenue at School Boulevard. 4. By 2030 consider the construction of a traffic signal system or single lane roundabout at the intersection of Fenning Avenue at School Boulevard. It is understood that Wright County plans to take jurisdiction over Fenning Avenue in the next 2-3 years. HAVEN RIDGE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC STUDY CITY OF MONTICELLO WSB PROJECT NO. 12471-000 PAGE 23 Appendix D: Well Logs Minnesota Unique Well Number County Wright MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 136613 Quad Monticello WELL AND BORING REPORT Qnaa 1D 138D Minnesota Statutes Chapter 1031 Well Name Township Range Dir Section Subsection BYE, ART 121 25 W 24 BCAAAC Elevation 982 ft. Elev. Method CALL FROM 2 -FOOT COUNTY DEM 5235 85TH ST NE MONTICELLO MN 55362 tigraphy Information ogical Material From To (ft.) Color Hardness SOIL 0 5 .VEL & CLAY 5 14 YELLOW Y 14 30 LT. BRN Y 30 38 GRAY Y & SAND 38 42 GRAY D COARSE 42 58 DARK .VEL COARSE 58 70 DARK D -COARSE TIGHT 70 75 DARK .VEL -COARSE V. 75 82 BLACK Y SOME GRAVEL 82 85 RED D COARSE 85 95 GRYBRN 3T ON BOTTOM 95 95 Remarks Minnesota Well Index Report Entry Date 04/17/1988 Update Date 04/14/2014 Received Date Well Depth Depth Completed Date Well Completed 95 ft. 95 ft. 03/23/1977 Drill Method Non-specified Rotary Drill Fluid Use domestic Status Active Well Hydrofractured? Yes ❑ No ❑ From To Casing Type Single casing Joint Threaded Drive Shoe? Yes ® No ❑ Above/Below Casing Diameter Weight in. To ft. 10.7 lbs./ft. Open Hole From ft. To ft. Screen?X❑ Type stainless Make JOHNSON Diameter Slot/Gauze Length Set 4 in. 18 8 ft. ft. ft. Static Water Level 51 ft. land surface Measure 03/23/1977 Pumping Level (below land surface) Wellhead Completion Pitless adapter manufacturer Model ❑ Casing Protection ❑ 12 in. above grade ❑ At -grade (Environmental Wells and Borings ONLY) Grouting Information Well Grouted?X❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Specified Material Amount From To bentonite ft. ft. Nearest Known Source of Contamination feet Direction Type Well disinfected upon completion? Yes ❑ No Pump ❑ Not Installed Date Installed Manufacturer's name DEMPSTER Model Number HP 0.5 Volt 230 Length of drop pipe 63 ft Capacity 10 g•p• Typ Submersible Abandoned Does property have any not in use and not sealed well(s)? ❑ Yes ❑ No Variance Was a variance granted from the MDH for this well? ❑ Yes ❑ No Miscellaneous First Bedrock Aquifer Quat. buried Last Strat clay Depth to Bedrock ft Located by Minnesota Geological Survey Locate Method GPS SA Off (averaged) System UTM - NAD83, Zone 15, Meters X 438690 Y 5014043 Unique Number Verification Tax Records Input Date 01/27/2010 Angled Drill Hole Well Contractor Stevens Well Co. 27194 STEVENS, J. Licensee Business Lic. or Reg. No. Name of Driller 136613 Printed on 07/31/2018 HE -01205-15 Minnesota Unique Well Number County Wright MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Entry Date 06/10/1994 WELL AND BORING REPORT 23950 E5 Quad Monticello Update Date 02/14/2014 Minnesota Statutes Chapter 1031 Quad1D 138D Received Date Well Name Township Range Dir Section Subsection Well Depth Depth Completed Date Well Completed O'BRIEN, 121 25 W 24 CABACD 96 ft. 95 ft. 10/28/1993 Elevation 970 ft. Elev. Method CALC FROM 2-FOOT COUNTY DEM Drill Method Non-specified Rotary Drill Fluid Bentonite ddress Use domestic Status Active Well 5403 85TH ST NE MONTICELLO MN 55362 Well Hydrofractured? Yes ❑ No ❑ From To Casing Type Single casing Joint Threaded Stratigraphy Information Drive Shoe? Yes ❑ No ❑X Above/Below Geological Material From To (ft.) Color Hardness Casing Diameter Weight Hole Diameter CLAY FIRM 0 30 BROWN 4 in. To 91 ft. 10.7 lbs./ft. 8.7 in. To 30 ft. CLAY & ROCKS FIRM 30 63 BROWN 6.2 in. To 95 ft. SAND 63 78 BRNBLK SOFT SAND & GRAVEL 78 95 BROWN SOFT CLAY FIRM 95 96 BROWN Open Hole From ft. To ft. Screen? X❑ Type stainless Make JOHNSON 304 Diameter Slot/Gauze Length Set 4.5 in. 15 4.5 ft. 92 ft. 95 ft. Remarks WELL LOCATED ITS OF SE CORNER OF GARAGE. Static Water Level 38 ft. land surface Measure 10/28/1993 Pumping Level (below land surface) 58 ft. 3 hrs. Pumping at 40 g.p.m Wellhead Completion Pitless adapter manufacturer BAKER Model SNAPPY ❑ Casing Protection ❑X 12 in. above grade ❑ At -grade (Environmental Wells and Borings ONLY) Grouting Information Well Grouted?X❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Specified Material Amount From To bentonite 1.1 Cubic yards 0 ft. 91 ft. Nearest Known Source of Contamination 50 feet West Direction Sentic tank/drain field Type Well disinfected upon completion? Yes ❑ No Pump ❑ Not Installed Date Installed 01/10/1993 Manufacturer's name GRUNDFOS Model Number 25510-7 HP 1 Volt 230 Length of drop pipe 63 ft Capacity 23 g.p. Typ Submersible Abandoned Does property have any not in use and not sealed well(s)? ❑ Yes ❑X No Variance Was a variance granted from the MDH for this well? ❑ Yes ❑ No Miscellaneous First Bedrock Aquifer Quat. buried Last Strat clay -brown Depth to Bedrock ft Located by Minnesota Geological Survey Locate Method GPS SA Off (averaged) System UTM - NAD83, Zone 15, Meters X 438869 Y 5013610 Unique Number Verification Tax Records Input Date 01/27/2010 Angled Drill Hole Well Contractor Renner E.H. Well 71015 SCHAFFER, R. Licensee Business Lic. or Reg. No. Name of Driller Minnesota Well Index Report 523950 Printed on 07/31/2018 HE -01205-15 Minnesota Unique Well Number County Wright MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Entry Date 05/17/2000 Hardness Y WELL AND BORING REPORT 15 609694 Quad Monticello Y & ROCKS Update Date 05/03/2010 19 BROWN Minnesota Statutes Chapter 1031 D & GRAVEL Quad ID 138D VARIED Received Date Well Name Township Range Dir Section Subsection Well Depth Depth Completed Date Well Completed 121 25 W 24 BBBDBB 67 ft. 66 ft. 05/07/1998 Elevation 958 ft. Elev. Method CALC FROM 2 -FOOT COUNTY DEM Drill Method Non-specified Rotary Drill Fluid Bentonite ddress 66 Use domestic Status Active 5106 85TH ST NE MONTICELLO MN 55362 tigraphy Information ogical Material From To (ft.) Color Hardness Y 0 15 TAN HARD Y & ROCKS 15 19 BROWN MEDIUM D & GRAVEL 19 25 VARIED SOFT Y 25 30 GRAY MEDIUM D & GRAVEL 30 66 VARIED SOFT Y 66 67 RED HARD Remarks Well Hydrofractured? Yes ❑ No ❑ From Casing Type Single casing Joint Drive Shoe? Yes ❑ No ❑ Above/Below Casing Diameter Weight 4 in. To 56 ft. lbs./ft. To Hole Diameter 8 in. To 30 ft. Open Hole From ft. To ft. Screen?X❑ Type plastic Make Diameter Slot/Gauze Length Set 4 in. 15 10 ft. ft. ft. Static Water Level 20 ft. land surface Measure 05/07/1998 Pumping Level (below land surface) ft. 2 hrs. Pumping at 25 g.p.m Wellhead Completion Pitless adapter manufacturer WHITEWATER Model ❑ Casing Protection ❑ 12 in. above grade ❑ At -grade (Environmental Wells and Borings ONLY) Grouting Information Well Grouted?X❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Specified Material Amount From To high solids bentonite 0 ft. 30 ft. Nearest Known Source of Contamination 25 feet South Direction Sentic tank/drain field Type Well disinfected upon completion? ❑ Yes ❑ No Pump ❑ Not Installed Date Installed 05/08/1998 Manufacturer's name RED JACKET Model Number HP 1 Volt 230 Length of drop pipe 40 ft Capacity 18 g.p. Typ Submersible Abandoned Does property have any not in use and not sealed well(s)? ❑ Yes ❑ No Variance Was a variance granted from the MDH for this well? ❑ Yes ❑ No Miscellaneous First Bedrock Aquifer Quat. buried Last Strat clay -red Depth to Bedrock ft Located by Minnesota Geological Survey Locate Method GPS SA Off (averaged) System UTM - NAD83, Zone 15, Meters X 438468 Y 5014387 Unique Number Verification Tax Records Input Date 01/27/2010 Angled Drill Hole Well Contractor Bergerson-Caswell 27058 FELTMANN, T. Licensee Business Lic. or Reg. No. Name of Driller Minnesota Well Index Report 609694 Printed on 07/31/2018 HE -01205-15 Minnesota Unique Well Number County Wright MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Entry Date 04/08/2002 WELL AND BORING REPORT Casing Type Single casing 62223 E6 Quad Monticello Update Date 05/03/2010 Drive Shoe? Yes ❑ No ❑X Above/Below Minnesota Statutes Chapter 1031 From To (ft.) Color Hardness Quad1D 138D Hole Diameter Received Date ell Name Township Range Dir Section Subsection Well Depth Depth Completed Date Well Completed COLLINS, 121 25 W 23 DADCBD 88 ft. 88 ft. 07/30/2001 IW Elevation 974 ft. Elev. Method CALC FROM 2 -FOOT COUNTY DEM Drill Method Non-specified Rotary Drill Fluid Bentonite ddress LAY Use domestic Status Active �/W 8278 EISELE AV MONTICELLO MN 55362 Well Hydrofractured? Yes ❑ No ❑X From To Casing Type Single casing Joint stratigraphy Information Drive Shoe? Yes ❑ No ❑X Above/Below 3eological Material From To (ft.) Color Hardness Casing Diameter Weight Hole Diameter LAY 0 34 BROWN 4 in. To 84 ft. lbs./ft. 8.5 in. To 30 ft. SAND & GRAVEL 34 59 6.5 in. To 88 ft. LAY 59 66 BROWN 3RAVEL 66 80 HARD WATER SAND 80 88 Open Hole From ft. To ft. Screen? X❑ Type stainless Make WESCO Diameter Slot/Gauze Length Set 4 in. 12 4 ft. 84 ft. 88 ft. Static Water Level 22 ft. land surface Measure 07/30/2001 Pumping Level (below land surface) ft. hrs. Pumping at 30 g.p.m Wellhead Completion Pitless adapter manufacturer WHITEWATER Model ❑ Casing Protection ❑ 12 in. above grade ❑ At -grade (Environmental Wells and Borings ONLY) Grouting Information Well Grouted?X❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Specified Material Amount From To high solids bentonite 2 Sacks 0 ft. 40 ft. Nearest Known Source of Contamination 55 feet Northwes Direction Type Well disinfected upon completion? Yes ❑ No Pump ❑ Not Installed Date Installed 08/21/2001 Manufacturer's name HOMEOWNER'S Model Number HP Volt Length of drop pipe ft Capacity g.p. Typ Submersible Abandoned Does property have any not in use and not sealed well(s)? ❑ Yes ❑X No Variance Was a variance granted from the MDH for this well? ❑ Yes X❑ No Miscellaneous First Bedrock Aquifer Quat. buried Last Strat sand Depth to Bedrock ft Located by Minnesota Geological Survey Remarks Locate Method GPS SA Off (averaged) System UTM - NAD83, Zone 15, Meters X 438145 Y 5013347 Unique Number Verification Tax Records Input Date 01/27/2010 Angled Drill Hole Well Contractor Torgerson Well Co. 27056 TORGERSON, R. Licensee Business Lic. or Reg. No. Name of Driller Minnesota Well Index Report 662223 Printed on 07/31/2018 HE -01205-15 Minnesota Unique Well Number MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH County Wright Entry Date 09/04/2012 789748 Quad Monticello WELL AND BORING REPORT Update Date 09/17/2012 Quad ID 138D Minnesota Statutes Chapter 1031 Received Date 06/25/2012 IH ell Name Township Range Dir Section Subsection Well Depth Depth Completed Date Well Completed OLKER, MARK 121 25 W 23 DDBACC 155 ft. 150 ft. 04/25/2012 levation 959 ft. Elev. Method 7.5 minute topographic map (+/- 5 feet) Drill Method Non-specified Rotary Drill Fluid Bentonite ddress Use irrigation Status Active act 5420 37 CR NE MONTICELLO MN 55362 Well Hydrofractured? Yes ❑ No ❑X From To EISELE AV NE MONTICELLO MN 55362 Casing Type Single casing Joint tigraphy Information Drive Shoe? Yes ❑ No ❑X Above/Below ogical Material From To (ft.) Color Hardness Casing Diameter Weight Hole Diameter SOIL 0 2 BROWN SOFT 8 in. To 140 ft. 28.5 lbs./ft. 13 in. To 155 ft. Y 2 9 BROWN SOFT Y 9 13 GRAY SOFT Y 13 18 BROWN SOFT D FINE 18 33 BROWN SOFT Y 33 34 GRAY SOFT Open Hole From ft. To ft. Screen? X❑ Type stainless Make JOHNSON D 34 59 GRAY SOFT Diameter Slot/Gauze Length Set Y 59 83 GRAY SOFT 8 in. 100 10 ft. 140 ft. 150 ft. D 83 97 BROWN SOFT Y ROCKS 97 99 GRAY MEDIUM Static Water Level D 99 100 BROWN SOFT 21 ft. land surface Measure 04/25/2012 D FINE 100 120 BROWN SOFT D 120 150 BROWN SOFT Pumping Level (below land surface) D & CLAY 150 155 GRAY SOFT 43 ft. 1.5 hrs. Pumping at 500 g.p.m. Wellhead Completion Pitless adapter manufacturer Model ❑ Casing Protection ❑X 12 in. above grade ❑ At -grade (Environmental Wells and Borings ONLY) Grouting Information Well Grouted?X❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Specified Material Amount From To bentonite 16 Sacks ft. 50 ft. Nearest Known Source of Contamination 500 feet North Direction Se_ntic tank/drain field Type Well disinfected upon completion? Yes ❑ No Pump ® Not Installed Date Installed Manufacturer's name Model Number HP Volt Length of drop pipe ft Capacity g,p, Typ Abandoned Does property have any not in use and not sealed well(s)? ❑ Yes ❑X No Variance Was a variance granted from the MDH for this well? ❑ Yes X❑ No Miscellaneous First Bedrock Aquifer Quat. buried Last Strat clay+sand-gray Depth to Bedrock ft Located by Minnesota Geological Survey Remarks Locate Method Digitization (Screen) -Map (1:24,0 DRILLERS: ROBBIE TERRES & BRUCE NORDHAUSEN. System UTM - NAD83, Zone 15, Meters X 43 438014 Y 5013184 Unique Number Verification Info/GPS from data Input Date 09/04/2012 Angled Drill Hole Well Contractor Mark J Traut Wells, Inc. 1404 ROBBIEBRUCE Licensee Business Lic. or Reg. No. Name of Driller Minnesota Well Index Report 789748 Printed on 07/31/2018 HE -01205-15 AGENCY DISTRIBUTION LIST Dan Card Prefix First Name Last Name Title Company Conservation Library - Board of Water & Soil Resources Environmental Review Program Environmental Quality Board Ms. Becky Balk Debra Department of Agriculture Mr. Ray Kirsch Helen Department of Commerce Documents - 2nd Floor Hennepin County Library Environmental Health Division Minnesota Department of Health Environmental Review Mr. Randall Doneen Unit DNR Manager - Government Programs and Ms. Sarah Beimers Compliance SHPO Mr. Dan Card Environmental Review Unit Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Ms. Annie Felix-Gerth Conservation Library - Board of Water & Soil Resources Office of Environmental Ms. Debra Moynihan Stewardship Mn/DOT Great River Regional Library Ms. Angela Schumann City Planner City of Monticello Mr. Luke Johnson District Manager Wright County SWCD Monticello Township Mr. Sean Riley Zoning Administrator Wright County Planning and Zoning MnDOT Principal Ms. Jennifer Wiltgen Planner Mn/DOT Minnesota Pollution Control Ms. Karen Kromar Project Manager Agency Mr. Virgil Hawkins County Engineer Wright County Transporation Environmental Conservation Library - Minneapolis Central Government Ms. Helen Burke Documents - 2nd Floor Hennepin County Library US Fish and Wildlife Service Regulatory Functions Mr. Chad Konickson Branch US Army Corps of Engineers Office of Enforcement and Compliance Mr. Kenneth Westlake Assurance US EPA - Region 5 Ms. Amanda Gronhovd State Archaeologist Fort Snelling History Center Ms. Melissa Cerda Indian Affairs Council Minnesota Historic Minnesota Historical Society - Preservation Office Review and Compliance Great River Regional Library Ms. Angela Schumann City Planner City of Monticello Mr. Luke Johnson District Manager Wright County SWCD Monticello Township Mr. Sean Riley Zoning Administrator Wright County Planning and Zoning MnDOT Principal Ms. Jennifer Wiltgen Planner Mn/DOT Minnesota Pollution Control Ms. Karen Kromar Project Manager Agency Mr. Virgil Hawkins County Engineer Wright County Transporation Monticello Council Connection September 24, 2018 CITY OF MontkeRo DMV August 2018, DMV year-to-date revenue is $499,125.15 an increase of $83,931.34 or 20.2% over the same period last year. Please see the following graphs for more detail. $70,000 $60,000 $50,000 $40,000 $30,000 $20,000 $10,000 12,000 10,000 8,000 6,000 4,000 2,000 $600,000 $500,000 $400,000 $300,000 $200,000 $100,000 100,000 90,000 80,000 70,000 60,000 50,000 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 DMV Revenue Comparison 557 34R $59,421 Aug 2011 Aug 2012 Aug 2013 Aug 2014 Aug 2015 Aug 2016 Aug 2017 Aug 2018 DMV Transaction Comparison 10,532 Aug 2011 Aug 2012 Aug 2013 Aug 2014 Aug 2015 Aug 2016 Aug 2017 Aug 2018 DMV Year -to -Date Revenue Comparison $499,125 Aug 2011 Aug 2012 Aug 2013 Aug 2014 Aug 2015 Aug 2016 Aug 2017 Aug 2018 DMV Year -to -Date Transaction Comparison 86.600 Aug 2011 Aug 2012 Aug 2013 Aug 2014 Aug 2015 Aug 2016 Aug 2017 Aug 2018 7� CH Y OF ntfcdo ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Below is a summary of recent meetings: July 23, 2018 - Rotary Club Mtg July 25, 2018 - Business Retention & Expansion Mtg with Pizza Factory July 30, 2018 - Just Transition Foundation Mtg July 30, 2018 - Coalition of Utility Cities, St. Paul, MN August 6, 2018 - Rotary Club Mtg August 9, 2018 - Downtown Round Mtg #1 August 9, 2018 - Mtg with developer August 13, 2018 - Rotary Club Mtg August 13, 2018 - Mtg with downtown property owner re: property and future development August 14, 2018 Mtg with prospect re: sites for potential locations August 27, 2018 - Rotary Club Mtg August 29, 2018 - Bondhus GMEF Loan Closing August 30, 2018 - Mtg with downtown property owners re: Fagade Grant Impr. Program August 30, 2018 - Mtg with WCEDP and CMJTS re: marketing concept August 30, 2018 - Community Development Network Mtg September 4, 2018 - Pre -Design Mtg with developer September 6, 2018 - Mtg with downtown property owner re: Grant Impr. Program September 10, 2018 - Rotary Club Mtg September 11, 2018 - WCEDP Fundraiser Event, Buffalo September 13, 2018 - Taste of the Towns Event sponsored by Rotary Club September 17, 2018 - Rotary Club Mtg Council Connection - 09/24/18 September 18, 2018 — Chamber of Commerce Lunch Mtg September 19, 2018 — Xcel Community Appreciation Breakfast Mtg September 19, 2018 — Mtg with new CMJTS Econ. Dev. Coordinator Update of EDA Property Demolitions in 2018 Properties/Parcels Purpose of Acquisition 255 East Broadway Demolition activities completed week of August 19, 2018 through August 23, 2018. Fire Training Burn occurred on 8-19-18 followed by typical demo debris removal and site restoration per City Ordinance (black dirt and grass seed). See attached photos. Combining this now vacant parcel with the former Fair Garden Center makes this overall site (1.35 acres) more attractive for potential development. 103 Pine Street All tenants have completely vacated. Several antique dealers moved to downtown Elk River Antique Mall - Store. Several other antique dealers closed up shop. Going -In -Style hair salon moved into vacant space in Hillside Mall, 518 Cedar Street, Monticello, MN. Finishing touches are being added to the new salon. Relocation claims are being processed. Demolition activities will occur after approval of a development agreement; anticipated in 2019 or 2020. 112 West River Street Waiting for tenants to vacate in early 2019 and for developer proposal prior to commencing demolition activities. 7 "4 "' r' w .x - � �' 4'�'.�..'.� � � - ire ■s .. _... �,, � ..�+'� 7� CH Y OF ntfcdo HI -WAY LIQUORS Sales through August 31, 2018 Attached is the data for total sales in each major category through the end of August 2018. Hi -Way Liquors Sales Report 8/31/2018 Total Sales Month 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Jan $ 249,670.43 $ 316,280.10 $ 300,631.85 $ 296,838.64 $ 302,114.52 $ 328,004.13 $ 355,029.76 $ 380,425.45 $ 364,675.32 $ 356,295.18 $ 403,520.92 Feb 255,440.36 284,988.38 285,584.50 315,239.00 307,385.41 337,923.99 333,487.18 347,777.77 362,746.98 364,836.39 390,050.52 Mar 295,257.14 318,050.39 324,062.21 335,032.60 388,195.21 408,071.17 377,391.62 388,003.16 401,256.91 417,005.50 473,811.33 Apr 281,365.81 346,738.34 369,112.88 389,543.24 347,321.09 388,395.50 389,250.82 421,280.89 428,729.44 448,141.63 467,192.12 May 377,177.10 384,337.08 399,489.67 409,309.12 433,829.01 436,195.21 498,095.67 523,401.05 482,917.95 503,867.81 549,206.70 Jun 350,727.93 381,782.23 377,458.15 409,726.07 461,423.68 440,255.04 426,392.73 474,203.81 470,585.33 521,559.76 561,287.34 Jul 409,870.50 430,838.23 466,122.69 466,738.15 447,452.18 485,459.76 479,174.06 542,973.27 527,519.46 563,935.31 571,270.49 Aug 409,575.96 383,523.07 386,245.30 408,734.83 445,158.94 503,181.84 484,955.71 470,505.22 462,669.36 497,201.21 544,029.21 Sep 317,846.07 346,900.80 346,557.62 373,719.64 390,399.33 379,381.19 397,495.82 439,444.29 448,218.93 501,126.67 - Oct 351,268.98 360,742.04 375,367.40 365,702.14 372,676.23 396,328.87 409,967.74 460,096.82 454,442.30 461,549.38 Nov 332,605.88 341,875.49 360,661.96 376,855.40 421,960.12 424,038.37 465,299.53 474,241.74 444,533.08 495,519.24 Dec 436,379.03 454,982.63 485,617.01 505,482.70 527,865.36 518,379.58 549,200.76 569,707.38 605,509.16 629,143.57 Total $ 4,067,185.19 $ 4,351,038.78 $ 4,476,911.24 $ 4,652,921.53 $ 4,845,781.08 $ 5,045,614.65 $ 5,165,741.40 $ 5,492,060.85 $ 5,453,804.22 $ 5,760,181.65 $ 3,960,368.63 Change $ 283,853.59 $ 125,872.46 $ 176,010.29 $ 192,859.55 $ 199,833.57 $ 120,126.75 $ 326,319.45 $ (38,256.63) $ 306,377.43 $ (1,799,813.02) Change % 7.0% 2.9% 3.9% 4.1% 4.1% 2.4% 6.3% -0.7% 5.6% -31.2% $700,000 $600,000 $500,000 $400,000 $300,000 $200,000 $100,000 Monthly Hi -Way Sales Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec ■ 2008 ■ 2009 ■ 2010 ■ 2011 ■ 2012 ■ 2013 ■ 2014 ■ 2015 ■ 2017 ■ 2018 CYM-LYM 13.3% 6.9% 13.6% 4.3% 9.0% 7.6% 1.3% 9.4% Y -T -D 13.3% 10.0% 11.4% 9.3% 9.3% 8.9% 7.6% 7.8% Hi -Way Liquors Sales Report 8/31/2018 Beer i Mar Apr Month 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Jan $ 122,218.36 $ 157,849.78 $ 146,246.32 $ 143,906.08 $ 149,406.45 $ 160,903.32 $ 173,814.13 $ 191,370.26 $ 176,483.68 $ 174,846.99 $ 198,202.11 Feb 121,734.33 137,055.23 140,624.54 150,075.08 150,589.28 162,865.75 161,168.63 164,508.11 175,055.27 179,346.12 187,042.58 Mar 138,889.05 155,196.13 164,157.70 163,595.55 203,957.25 192,607.52 185,325.68 192,955.79 199,141.66 208,926.70 233,971.24 Apr 146,613.65 178,834.20 189,978.23 194,504.16 179,486.77 186,134.31 198,195.77 219,756.39 228,133.10 234,069.51 224,348.27 May 201,232.14 210,097.48 223,678.47 208,963.65 227,664.73 234,738.30 256,188.77 259,306.91 250,403.11 262,275.25 306,245.55 Jun 193,801.97 207,793.83 206,043.42 224,769.03 259,671.21 243,389.79 238,322.11 263,421.95 263,264.15 296,531.85 309,163.93 Jul 226,317.96 229,199.79 260,971.50 258,734.60 253,648.64 273,319.54 265,555.32 301,867.65 296,513.68 315,848.83 314,343.95 Aug 226,653.65 203,222.86 211,996.32 216,546.53 242,179.20 281,577.25 267,802.95 253,141.21 250,255.41 268,173.42 292,626.23 Sep 166,679.60 183,586.32 183,865.70 199,170.24 208,974.88 202,213.80 211,854.94 233,215.56 238,333.55 270,898.13 - Oct 176,382.34 179,873.10 190,893.27 180,043.06 187,386.57 191,764.20 210,454.13 234,882.09 224,253.93 228,484.62 Nov 158,322.50 154,584.13 168,265.14 171,866.27 195,276.37 192,162.71 202,081.91 207,055.40 213,333.23 222,993.99 Dec 187,691.06 190,655.19 203,080.13 216,560.71 224,952.83 217,491.21 234,178.12 241,996.27 253,223.11 271,457.72 Total $ 2,066,536.61 $ 2,187,948.04 $ 2,289,800.74 $ 2,328,734.96 $ 2,483,194.18 $ 2,539,167.70 $ 2,604,942.46 $ 2,763,477.59 $ 2,768,393.88 $ 2,933,853.13 $ 2,065,943.86 Change $ 121,411.43 $ 101,852.70 $ 38,934.22 $ 154,459.22 $ 55,973.52 $ 65,774.76 $ 158,535.13 $ 4,916.29 $ 165,459.25 $ (867,909.27) Change % 5.9% 4.7% 1.7% 6.6% 2.3% 2.6% 6.1% 0.2% 6.0% -29.6% $350,000 $300,000 $250,000 $200,000 $150,000 $100,000 $50,000 M Jan Feb Monthly Beer Sales Aug Sep ■ 2008 ■ 2009 ■ 2010 ■ 2011 ■ 2012 ■ 2013 ■ 2014 ■ 2015 ■ 2017 ■ 2018 Oct Nov Dec CYM-LYM 13.4% 4.3% 12.0% -4.2% 16.8% 4.3% -0.5% 9.1% Y -T -D 13.4% 8.8% 10.0% 5.8% 8.5% 7.6% 6.1% 6.5% i Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep ■ 2008 ■ 2009 ■ 2010 ■ 2011 ■ 2012 ■ 2013 ■ 2014 ■ 2015 ■ 2017 ■ 2018 Oct Nov Dec CYM-LYM 13.4% 4.3% 12.0% -4.2% 16.8% 4.3% -0.5% 9.1% Y -T -D 13.4% 8.8% 10.0% 5.8% 8.5% 7.6% 6.1% 6.5% Hi -Way Liquors Sales Report 8/31/2018 Liquor Month 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Jan $ 73,930.87 $ 92,370.42 $ 91,472.50 $ 91,279.01 $ 93,085.69 $ 103,977.89 $ 113,943.25 $ 118,577.85 $ 118,211.20 $ 114,509.99 $ 133,589.33 Feb 74,261.89 83,513.27 85,484.92 96,541.21 92,489.93 106,387.16 107,609.55 112,198.85 113,060.59 117,361.15 128,952.50 Mar 78,870.42 88,569.65 93,133.42 101,047.04 112,244.43 124,487.55 116,316.49 118,269.49 118,839.79 131,238.09 151,716.52 Apr 76,735.80 90,627.19 95,025.54 110,898.81 98,080.67 113,594.37 115,579.47 123,841.34 126,073.89 130,114.53 136,883.13 May 103,409.29 102,041.75 106,395.62 111,586.59 114,299.35 127,622.31 135,370.38 140,116.66 129,009.36 142,237.28 160,936.65 Jun 91,805.81 103,580.02 102,086.20 115,136.72 128,604.32 124,019.90 120,291.71 136,716.81 135,763.26 147,813.59 168,769.36 J u I 105,782.85 118,883.98 122,861.98 130,624.19 123,672.73 139,270.04 139,967.77 155,436.54 150,173.35 160,220.37 170,108.99 Aug 106,489.25 103,977.01 101,487.43 113,869.37 126,065.14 141,197.73 138,660.76 136,440.40 135,841.14 144,263.78 164,013.08 Sep 88,448.34 94,335.50 94,528.17 103,373.64 109,153.56 107,605.71 115,119.19 129,195.42 130,101.01 143,252.37 - Oct 97,046.60 102,236.90 102,983.14 103,533.14 106,326.73 116,677.74 124,271.15 140,198.97 128,290.50 145,864.34 Nov 97,348.39 90,996.73 102,298.02 105,501.75 120,127.29 126,412.24 134,241.85 132,261.11 134,208.12 149,468.96 Dec 135,221.23 143,684.12 153,690.60 159,717.50 172,370.96 175,523.36 184,746.26 190,944.24 205,335.83 213,217.73 Total $ 1,129,350.74 $ 1,214,816.54 $ 1,251,447.54 $ 1,343,108.97 $ 1,396,520.80 $ 1,506,776.00 $ 1,546,117.83 $ 1,634,197.68 $ 1,624,908.04 $ 1,739,562.18 $ 1,214,969.56 Change $ 85,465.80 $ 36,631.00 $ 91,661.43 $ 53,411.82 $ 110,255.21 $ 39,341.83 $ 88,079.85 $ (9,289.64) $ 114,654.14 $ (524,592.62) Change % 7.6% 3.0% 7.3% 4.0% 7.9% 2.6% 5.7% -0.6% 7.1% -30.2% Monthly Liquor Sales $250,000 ■ 2008 $200,000 — ■ 2009 ■ 2010 $150,000 — — ■ 2011 ■ 2012 $100,000 'I — ■ 2013 ■ ■ 2014 $50,000■ 2015 ■ 2017 ■ 2018 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec CYM-LYM 16.7% 9.9% 15.6% 5.2% 13.1% 14.2% 6.2% 13.7% Y -T -D 16.7% 13.2% 14.1% 11.7% 12.1% 12.5% 11.4% 11.7% Hi -Way Liquors Sales Report 8/31/2018 Wine Month 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Jan $ 30,700.42 $ 41,810.19 $ 43,324.18 $ 48,437.59 $ 50,238.83 $ 54,949.83 $ 59,391.16 $ 61,128.65 $ 60,454.56 $ 57,275.16 $ Feb 33,407.17 39,410.85 42,230.84 52,847.05 54,642.27 60,573.12 57,228.51 62,600.47 64,797.38 58,664.45 Mar 47,603.93 45,525.38 46,165.18 54,639.16 57,735.22 77,810.58 66,425.24 67,121.51 71,840.82 64,286.75 Apr 31,755.42 48,303.48 61,146.04 62,289.18 57,973.74 79,736.19 63,101.05 63,285.56 61,268.24 69,415.79 May 38,522.75 40,963.86 45,733.08 68,701.95 78,740.40 62,491.07 92,083.62 109,512.94 87,333.35 82,724.29 Jun 31,796.95 37,522.00 44,211.14 49,089.65 56,607.74 59,523.15 54,270.56 59,036.14 54,889.39 58,623.08 Jul 36,909.44 41,813.65 48,334.93 49,664.45 54,467.20 57,115.44 57,743.98 66,029.11 60,750.62 64,034.24 Aug 35,932.62 41,333.00 46,871.28 53,172.68 61,825.30 64,057.61 62,446.04 63,546.01 60,015.78 66,304.12 Sep 33,830.69 39,798.20 47,859.52 53,916.37 60,317.17 59,121.12 59,409.30 62,210.27 65,294.31 68,220.79 Oct 45,750.04 48,422.79 58,081.87 60,949.40 66,423.82 75,606.28 63,659.41 70,038.32 89,005.29 70,516.61 Nov 50,106.64 66,331.86 71,928.30 85,933.28 97,249.52 96,824.40 117,402.23 122,947.90 83,896.45 109,969.88 Dec 75,866.80 84,285.84 101,676.19 109,267.01 116,610.70 113,008.24 115,617.50 120,274.96 129,536.28 124,115.79 Total $ 492,182.87 $ 575,521.10 $ 657,562.55 $ 748,907.77 $ 812,831.91 $ 860,817.03 $ 868,778.60 $ 927,731.84 $ 889,082.47 $ 894,150.95 $ Change $ 83,338.23 $ 82,041.45 $ 91,345.22 $ 63,924.14 $ 47,985.12 $ 7,961.57 $ 58,953.24 $ (38,649.37) $ 5,068.48 $ Change % 16.9% 14.3% 13.9% 8.5% 5.9% 0.9% 6.8% -4.2% 0.6% $140,000 $120,000 $100,000 $80,000 $60,000 $40,000 $20,000 Jan Feb Mar Apr Monthly Wine Sales iki May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2018 60,047.20 62,027.36 74,221.20 93,299.96 61,684.97 61,777.09 64,494.29 67,701.51 545,253.58 (348,897.37) -39.0% ■ 2008 ■ 2009 ■ 2010 ■ 2011 ■ 2012 ■ 2013 ■ 2014 ■ 2015 ■ 2017 ■ 2018 CYM-LYM Y -T -D 4.8% 4.8% 5.7% 5.3% 15.5% 8.9% 34.4% 16.0% -25.4% 5.7% 5.4% 5.6% 0.7% 5.0% 2.1% 4.6% CA c 0 $6.5 $6.0 $5.5 $5.0 $4.5 $4.0 $3.5 $3.0 Liquor Store Sales - Rolling 12 Month Periods v c �^ z v c `� 0 v C: �' z v c N z v C: �^ z v c N z v K K - V z v c` �' z v K c N z v K K — 7 v v — 0 7 v v — v v — 7 v v — 0 7 v v — 7 v v — 0 7 v v — 7 v v — 7 v v — 0 7 v v l0 0 N W Ln 01 V 00 CH Y OF Monticello MONTICELLO COMMUNITY CENTER (MCC) Transactions and visits Year to date (08.31.18), the MCC processed 61,713 transactions, which is 8,801 fewer transactions than we had at the same time last year. The MCC year to date revenue is $1,243,293 which is an increase of $76,683 from last year. Year to date member visits are 92,627 compared to 93,341 last year. We closed out the month of July with 5,001 members compared to 3,889 last year. 120000 100000 80000 60000 40000 20000 MCC 8/31 YTD Activity YTD Transactions YTD Member Visits ■ 2016 ■ 2017 ■ 2018 Council Connection - 09/24/18 $1,400,000 $1,200,000 $1,000,000 $800,000 $600,000 $400,000 $200,000 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 MCC 8/31 YTD Revenue ■ 2016 ■ 2017 ■ 2018 MCC 8/31 Members ■ 2016 ■ 2017 ■ 2018 Programs and Events • The pool looks great after being closed Labor Day for a week to do annual maintenance. • Fall 2018 Swimming Lessons begin September 24. We are offering Parent Child, Preschool and Learn to Swim Levels 1-5. These lessons will conclude just before Thanksgiving. • We are always in need of good lifeguards. To help with recruitment we will be offering an American Red Cross Lifeguard Training Course the weekend of October 19. We are encouraging members and guests to refer to our website for Council Connection - 09/24/18 monthly open swim hours. Due to the lack of lifeguards there are frequent changes to the schedule month to month. • Adult Flag Football has begun and proves to be growing in popularity with nine teams this year. Games are Wednesday nights at the city fields by Xcel. Fall men's softball league began September 6, games are Thursday evenings. Seven teams are playing. • Our first yoga event at the Bertram Chalet will take place Saturday, September 22. A 90 -minute Yin Yoga session at the serene chalet will hopefully result in more special yoga classes at Bertram. • The outdoor farmers' market continues through October 18. The market moves indoors one Saturday a month beginning November 3. • The community center is partnering with the Friends of Bertram, Wright County Parks and YMCA Camp Manitou to host Color Me Fall, a FREE family friendly event at Bertram. Color Me Fall takes place on Saturday, September 29, 11:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. A campfire, s'mores, a food truck, hayrides, crafts, face painting, fall games and live music are scheduled. • The community center will host a Walnut Street Boutique on November 11 from 1:00-4:00 p.m. in the Mississippi Room. We will be charging $40 per booth and vendors may bring in their boutique items to sell. We will have one of our caterers sell beer/wine and a few snacks. We are hoping to continue to see this as an annual event to kick off the holiday shopping season. • A pet expo is also in the works for either this fall or coming spring. • Xcel Energy will hold their annual breakfast meeting in the Mississippi Room and this event brings in many business people from the area. • Two dance studios from the twin cities area have booked lock -ins with us this fall. • Highway Liquor will have their wine tasting in the Mississippi Room on Friday, October 26. M04CH Y OF icella PARKS DEPARTMENT The Parks Department's primary goal is to maintain the city's park and pathway facilities, which include cemeteries, picnic shelters, playgrounds, sports fields, etc. Here are a few of the key items that have been happening within the Parks Department: • Chipping requests • Cemetery; selling and locating graves • Locating Riverside grave lot pins • Equipment/vehicle repairs • Park rental setups • Routine building maintenance • Chipping Requests • Fertilizing • Sport field maintenance • Blow outs Updates: • Minncor Industries: FYI, the Minnesota Department of Corrections is no longer making the city's docks and fishing piers. Staff was contacted by Minncor Industries letting us know of the changes. Staff placed a final parts order and section of pier. At this time no manufacture replacement has been selected. • Featherstone Park: Staff completed the shelter and playground installation. Staff will work with developer in the future to provide a sidewalk connection. • Arts: Staff held the very first creativity workshop with Xcel energy employees and had a wonderful turnout. Workshop included building creativity planters and mosaic items for the downtown. • Emerald Ash Borer: The Ash bore has been found in Clearwater, MN at the Nelson Bros Truckstop and Holiday station. MDA is placing Wright County under quarantine. Staff will be giving an update at next farmers market. • Fall Cleanup: The last week in October is Fall Cleanup at Riverside Cemetery; all items on the ground need to be removed. • Roundabouts on Chelsea Rd: Staff spent over two weeks of unplanned work time attending to the future layout of planters and irrigation at Chelsea Rd roundabouts. Staff installed conduits, vaults, sleeves and irrigation boxes to be concreted in so contractors could move forward with construction. Council Connection - mm/dd/yy STREETS DEPARTMENT The Streets Department's primary goal is to maintain the city's roadway network, which includes the storm water infrastructure, in a safe and efficient manner. Here are a few of the key items that have been happening within the Streets Department: • Rebuilt and restored outfalls in River Mill Park. • Finished crack sealing and patching on all areas of the Chip Seal Project. • Astech completed the Chip Seal and Fog Seal Project for 2018. • Crack sealing School Boulevard from Fenning to Edmonson. • Road shoulder maintenance on Fenning, Fallon and Edmonson Avenues. UTILITIES DEPARTMENT The Utilities Department's primary goals are to provide for safe, reliable, and clean drinking water and to provide safe and efficient collection of wastewater without impacting the environment. Here are a few of the key items that have been happening within the Utilities Department: • Scheduled sewer cleaning and televising. • Reading water meters. • Utility locates. • Coordinating with the city projects. • Replacing failed water meters and radio reading units. • Daily lift station and well house rounds. • Training in new full-time employee on system and operations.