Parks Commission Agenda Packet 06-20-2002
.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
-
- 8.
AGE })A
PARKS CO MISSION
June 20, 20 2-4:30 p.m
West Prai ie l~oom
"To el/hal/ce L'OI/Ul1l11litl' pri e throllgh tll'I'dopil/g 1I11t1
l11aillfllil/il/g ci(f' Pllrl...\' II'ith ( high .llmlt/artl (!/,qlla/i(l'''
Call to Order
Approve Minutes of May 16,2002 regnla Parks Commissiou meetiug.
Consideration of adding items to the agen a.
Citizens requests.
Monticello Youth Football_ Gene Emanue
Shawn Weinaud - Townhome Developmen Review (Autumn Ridge)
Discussion ()fl~olling Woods Area Park pIa s.
Discussion of changing datc for regular I'ar s Commission mcctings and schcduling
additional meetings during the summer mon hs.
9. Pathway and stcps at East Bridge Park _ Pat way Alignment
10. Discussion of planters on Walnut Street.
II. Discussion of County noad 18 trail.
12. Park M~lintenanl'e Items.
13. LJpdatesl1{eports, if any:
14. AdjOurn
A. Entrance Signs
B. Subcommittee on A TV Lise
C. Financial-Park Dedication Fund Fec Su mary
D. Cemetery {)pdate - Memorials
.
NOTES TO PARK C )MMISSION AGENDA
June 0,2002
lnformatio'!;.
#5 - Monticello YOllfh Football_ This Was brought 'p at the May meeting and it Was noted at that time that
Mr. Emanuel had requested to appear be/;,re the Par s Commission at their June meeting. Earl Smith and R.ick
Traver Were to meet with John Simola and Adam lIa kinson to review thc condition of the fields prior to the
.Tunc meeting.
ded with the agenda is a preliminary drawing fi" the this
inand or his repreSentative may he present at the
#6 - Autumn H.idge Townhome Development _ Inc1
development and .Teff O'Neill indicated that Shawn
meeting to discuss this.
..-...
.......
#8 - Schedule of Parks Commission Meetings - Ther has been Some discussion on scheduling additional
meetings of the Parks CommiSSion during the summer 10nths and perhaps Changing the regular meeting date to
aCcommodate scheduling for the Park Superintendent. Since the meeting date o[the Parks Commission is not
set by ordinancc. the Parks Commission can cbange tbe day and time oftbe regular meeting, if they so desire.
For the extra meetings during the summer, once tbose d tes bave been determined a notice of tbese special
meetings Would bc published and posted and that would neet the statutory requirements. Attached is a
schedule submitted by Adanl Hawkinson.
# 10 - n;se ussion of pia n ters on Wain u t Street - At a rev i ous meeting it was no ted that taking care of the
planters On Walnut Street was not something the Parks 0 partment staff Would bc takiug on so the discussion
should f;,cus on what otber groups cnuld undertake the re. ponsibility and Whether there arc Sumcient monies in
the adopt-a-park aCCOUnt or elsewhere to fund this.
#13 - lJPdatesiReports - I don't know that there will be u dates on all the items listed.
.
MI OTES
I~EG VLAR MEE"fIN( .. PARKS COMMISSION
l'hursday, May 6, 2002 _ 4:30 P.m.
"7;, e."a.ce co......#, ;de f"ro.g" deve/op;.g aad
",a;.fa;."'g dry p.rk, ";f a Mg/, 'fa.d.", af q''',J;ry''
Members Present:
Larry Nolan. Frao Fair. Nanc McCallrey. Earl Smith, Rick Traver and Council
Liaison, Roger Carlson.
Members Absem:
None
Staff:
1. ~
Parks Superimendent. Adam H wkinsun
2. A rOVe minutes of A ril 18 2002 re 'u/ar Pa ks Commissiou meetin aud A ril 25 2002
~
Chair Larry Nolan called the meeting to order a 4:30 P.m. and declared a quorum present.
EARL SMlnl MOW:O TO APPROVE TI-IE MI liTES OF THE APRIL. 18.2002 PARKS
COMMISSION MEETING AND Tf!E APRIL 25 2002 SPECIAL MEETING WITH T/-[E
CORRECTION TO TH I' APRIL 18. 2002 MINUTES THA T nIl' PARKS COMMISSION
DETEnMINED TO GO WITH THE C()LO/~ED ( AL V ANIZED CHAINS ON T/-[E
/'LA YGnOllND EQUIPMENT BECAlISE rr AL JlWED FOn ManE ACCUnATE
GAUGING OF WEAR. nICK T1V\ VER SECONI ED TfJE ManON. MOTION CARnlED
WITH FRAN FAIR AND NANCy MCCAFFnEY BSIAINfNG.
3. Consideration of addin , items to the aoend..
Nancy MCCaflfey added a discussion of the Par West Park to the agenda and Larry Nolan added a
repon On the Be Active seminar to the agenda.
4.~
Greg Engle from the Monticello Youth Football Associ tion SPoke to the Parks Commission
regard in g COntinued Use of the ba II fields ftJr YOuth lootb III and soccer. He stated that a dec isio n had
heen made On not aHoWing the USe of the fields for filotball and soccer Without consulting the groups
who Use the fields. Earl Smith stated that the Use of the aWields for football Was on a trial basis.
Adam HaWkinson felt that multiple Use of the ballfields as nOI good and he ciled compaction of
fields, delerioration of Ihe turf and sUsceptibility to weed'. He indicated Ihat this Was especiaHy so
wilh Field #4. Greg Engle questioned how an assessment fdamage could be made so early in Ihe
season. Greg Engle did nol feel there Was anything Wron With the fields as a result of Ihe multiple
Parks Commission Minutes - 5/16/02
.
use and felt the decision to limit the use l' the fields was made without looking into it thoroughly.
Greg Engle stated that there is 150 kids iI grades 4-6 who participate in youth football. He felt that
with extra care and maintenance, the fiel s would not be irreparably damaged by multiple use. Since
there are not enough fields to meet the de nand, the existing fields had to be used for multiple
purposes. At the present time the youth 1'( otballleague, including teams from Becker, Rig Lake,
Milaca, Princeton and Monticello use the fields on Tuesday, Thursday and Saturday. Adam
Hawkinson stated that even though they h ve aerated and fertilized the fields there arc sti II areas
where the turf hasn't recovered yet. He as not only concerned about the condition of the field but
also the cost to maintain the fields. The elds need tirne for recovery from extended use and multiple
use doesn't allow for that recovery time. reg Engle questioned why the baseball team should have
exclusive use of the ballfield. Earl Smith asked if the softball fields could be used. Greg Engle
indicated they were 3' short. The Parksommission discussed rotating the fields for team use.
Greg Engle added that the soccer teams u 'e the fields as well and didn't feel rotating the fields would
meet the needs of the program.
.
The Parks Commission discussed other 0 tions in addition to rotating the fields, such as utilizing the
school fields and the fields by Dahlheime Distributing. Adam Hawkinson informed the Parks
Commission that there arc some lights th t could be donated and used on other fields and also
suggested re-scheduling the games so that they were played during the day which would lighten the
lnaintenance load for the park staff. Greg Engle replied that the lights were too old to be ctlicient and
stated that in the past the park department was always able to keep up with the field maintenance.
Earl Smith stated that before the Parks C\ mmissionmade any decision they would want to discuss it
further among the commission members. nd give it additional study. Since this item was put on the
agenda f(Jr the June meeting at the reques of Gene Emanuel it would be discussed further at that time.
Greg Engle stated that since the registrati n f(x the football league had already been sent out the
association would not be able to handle al y additional fee increase. .laney Velde, also with the
Monticello Youth Football, stated that the Parks Commission decision would impact the kids from
other communities as well as Monticello.
.
In further discussion of the field use, Ada 1 Hawkinson informed the Parks Commission that he had
talked to John Simola about the areas of ear on the fields before he even knew the ballfield was
used for soccer and J()otball. Five differel t organizations have use the field but contribute only $5,000
towards maintenance of the fields and ma'ntenance cost is far in excess of $5,000. Earl Smith that the
field used by the Polecats, the town baseb III team should be a good Jield in good shape. Earl Smith
also questioned who was scheduling the u e of the fields. Adam Hawkinson stated that the
scheduling is done through the Public Wo ks Office. Adam Hawkinson stated that they are still
trying to get a handle on how much use th ~ fields are getting so they can determine how much
maintenance they will have to do. The Pa 'ks Commission generally felt that the city may have to
continue to allow the use of the fields for his year and make establishment of new fIelds a priority in
next years budget. One suggestion was po 'sibly using the 4th Street park or Freeway Fields but the
concern was also expressed that the Park I epartment not be overextended in order to accommodate
the wishes of the various organizations us ng the facilities. Adam Hawkinson, John Simola, Earl Smith
2
.
.
.
7.
Parks Commission Minutes - 5/16/02
and Rick Traver will meet beJore the next Parks Commission meeting to review the fields and gather
additional information. Adam Hawkinso stated that at some point he envisioned establishment of an
athletic complex that would house the softball, soccer and football fields adding that with the fields in
one area maintenance is more efficient. It was noted that in previous discussions the area around
Kjellbergs had been discussed as a locatio [-or additional fields. It was felt that some study would
have to be done to determine the number of fields needed and the land area that would have to
acquired to develop these fields.
5.
Discussion of Rollin Woods/Wildwood {id c Area Park Plan.
Adam Hawkinson submitted a preliminary ketch showing an 8' trail coming off Bakken Street into
the park to the playground equipment and shelter. A meeting will be set up to get input from the
residents in the area. Adam Hawkinson w II have a couple of options that the residents can view and
comment on. Because of the sharp drop off towards the drainage area, the play area was placed as
Jar away as possible in order to keep a sepa ation between the play area and the hazardous area.
Pictures of some play structures for the pro osed park were submitted. This generated discussed as
to whether this type of development was ap ropriate fix a neighborhood park. Earl Smith felt the
neighborhood parks were meant more Jc)r sings while the play structures were more for
community parks. The Parks Commission t en discussed the definition of tot lot, neighborhood park
and community park, the area they serve an how they should be developed. Earl Smith felt the
Parks Commission should come up with a d velopment policy tlll' each type of park. Rick Traver felt
a play structure would be appropriate for thi. park as long as it not too elaborate in design and cited
#11707 or 11257 on the models pictured as nes he lelt appropriate. Adam l-lawkinson will come
back with additional pictures of play structUles.
6.
Pioneer Park Shelter.
Adam Hawkinson inJormed the Parks Comn ission that the cupolas had been ordered and the
contractor is suppose to be finishing the l1as ing. John Simola and Adamllawkinson will be meeting
with the Lions Club regarding the bathroom.. for the shelter. The CSAI-f 75 project will mill up a
portion of the roadway that will be used as b, se tllr the parking lot area. The material will be
provided at no charge. Sewer and water has t ) be brought to the shelter yet.
Pathway and stens at East Bridge Park.
Adam Hawkinson brought up another option elating to the steps and pathway at East Bridge Park.
He suggested that they come ofT the middle 0 the east end of the parking lot through the iris bed and
gradually wind down towards the river. With this route some of the irrigation system would have to
be relocated. Although this alignment would ot be as steep, it still would not be handicapped
accessible. However the access from West Bri ge Park to East Bridge Park is handicapped
accessible. It was felt that the steps could be emoved in the Jail and the vegetation transplanted then.
Adam Hawkinson will continue work on the a ignment.
3
.
.
.
9.
Parks Commission Minutes - 5/16/02
8.
Park Maintenance Items.
Adanl Ilawkinson submitted a list of the 11aintcnance work completed fl.)r the month. -l'hcre was
some additional discussion on maintcnan e in Riverside Cemetery and construction of the bike park at
the Community Center. The Park DCpart11cnt did the tree removal from the site and the Street
Ikpartrnent is doing the site preparation. The Parks Commission also discussed the plantings along
Walnut Street and who was to rnaintain tl1'm. The Parks Commission didn't feel the Park
Department could take on this responsibil ty with all the other duties they have. It was suggested that
something be set up similar to what is done by the Girl Scouts with Ellison Park. Adam Hawkinson
conunended the Park Departlnent staff in heir work on rebuilding the stone wall at West Bridge Park.
The Parks Commission requested when the picnic tables were set out at West Bridge Park one table
should also be located at East Bridge Park. Fran Fair asked about the timing of the irrigation system
at East Bridge Parle Leo Schroden indica cd that it is currently set to come on more frequently for
shorter periods of time because of the see ing. Once the seed is established the original sprinkling
schedule will be put in place. The creepil g charlie at the park also needs to be sprayed.
resentativ s to attend Plannin Commission/Council mcctin s.
The Parks Commission felt that someone 'hould be attending Planning Commission/Council nleetings
vvhen there are park related items on the a'cnda. It was suggested that the Park Chairman be on the
rnailing list to receive Planning Commissi m and Council agendas.
10.
LJ pdates.
A. Entrance Signs - Nancy McCalTre in1l.mned the Parks Commission that the proposed
entrance sign at the River Street 10 'ation would have to be reviewed by the Design Advisory
Team. Earl Smith informcd the P rks Commission that County responded that they would
not allow placing the city entrance sign on county right of way for CSAH 75. Earl Smith
felt there was adequate city right 0 'way fl.)r placing the west entrance sign on city right of
way. Adam Ilawkinson will work on getting the right of way area marked so it can be
detennined ifthere is adequate spa 'e to place the sign. Nancy McCaffrey will assist Adam
Ilawkinson in getting information m the construction of the signs.
B. ATV Subcommittee - The group n et prior to the regular Parks Commission meeting on
5/16/02. Larry Nolan stated that s atutes arc more restrictive regarding ATV use than they
arc snowrnobilc use. It comes do n to the f~lct the ATV's are basically ban for use within the
City. John Simola will be preparing a report to be submitted to the Parks Commission.
c.
Planning Comnlission Action on Carriage House and Bruggeman Development. A draft of
the Planning Commission minutes vas given to the Parks Comrnission which noted action
taken on the proposed deveJopmen s.
4
.
D.
Walk and Roll Update - Ribbon :otting Itl[ Freeway Pedestrian Bridge. The ribbon cutting
is scheduled jtl[ 9:30 a.m. on Jun I. 2002 and is being handled by WSB & Associates, the
engineers on the project. The Pa ks Commission have been invited to attend the ribbon
cutting ceremony. Adam Hawki 150n also talked aboul promoting the cily's parks as part
o l' th e co mnlLlIl it y' s eVents such a . River Fest an d Wa I k and Ro II. He suggested It, r next
years Walk and Roll they could d frisbee golfoI' a spin wheel game with questions about the
city' spark. He wi I I try to get an e ltry representing the parks j n the Ri v er Fest parade jar thi s
year.
Parks Commission Minutes - 5/16/02
II. U date on Amendment to Com rchens; c Plan. City stalT is planning a joint meeting of various
city commissions to review the proposed anendment to the city's comprehensive plan. A date has
not been set yet.
Added ltems~
Nancy MCCalTrey reported that a resident had requ sted that a baby swing be installed at thc Par West Park.
Adam Hawkioson said he would see if one of tl,e e. isting swings could be replaced with a baby Swing.
.
Larry Nolan reported on a Be Active seminar he ha atteoded. He will continue 10 be aClive in that group
and keep the Parks Commission updated. Larry N )Ian also suggested that may be some updated maps
showing the tmils could be made available lor the ri bon cutting cercmony.
12. ~djou"n
RICK TRA VER MOVED TO ADJOURN A . 7:30 P.M. EARL SMITH SECONDED THE
MaTrON. MOTION CARRlED UNANIMC lJSL Y.
----- --. ----.----.---------- --.---------. -------
Recording Secretary
.
5
.
.
.
DRAr=T
9.
Consideration of a sketch Ian review ()f a residential PUD in a PZM District.
Aoolicant: Shawn Weinand
Steve Grittman provided the report sta ing Shawn Weinand has requested a sketch plan
review of a PU D concept plan for a pI' posed residential project at the intersection of
School Boulevard and Oakwood Driv (County Road 117). Weinand requests review and
comment only at this time. Grittman' dvised that the information the Planning
Commission provides will help guide - subsequent application for concept and
development stage PUD approval at al upcoming meeting. The project is located in a
PZM Zoning District, and consists of' pproximately 162 townhouse units on about 19.4
acres, plus an additional 2.5 acres und rneath power line casements along the south
border of the project. This calculates 0 a net density (exclusive of the power line
property) 01'8.] units per acre. The g oss density, including the power line property,
would be approximately 7.3 units per ere.
The project relies on the ability to gai two access drives to County Road 117. Without
this additional access, it may be more important to have an internal "collector" road
serving the project. This will need to e determined with the County Transportation
Department. The City should also co ment on the layout issues raised by the plan.
A second issue raised by the plan is tl e location of a playground structure proposed for
the area under the power Ii nes in the s uthwest corner of the project. Based on
experience with other parks, staff is I' commending that playground areas be located
outside of thc power line casement ar as.
Connected to this issue is that of opel space within the project. Because or the density
and the Cact that the primary open spa'e in the project is shown in the power line
casement. there is very little contiguo IS open space within the project itself. The design
or the project is intended to allow for a constantly changing view within the project,
however, the views will almost always be of building facades. One of the suggestions for
the project is to attempt to consolidat areas of open space within the project. and develop
terminal views of that space for dri ve s within the project. From a plan view perspective,
the project appears to be very c1uttere 1.
At sketch stage, the City has the opp rtunity to give feedback to developers as to issues
that may be raised by the project desi1n. As with any PUD, the intent is to use flexibility
from ordinance standards to develop 1 project that is superior in design and amenities to
projects that would Ineet every ?:onin ) regulation. Since this project design is highly
schematic, the City's review should l1Cus on layout issues, open space, and general
density.
Staff is supportive of residential uses at this site, given the low density residential
development to the east and south. I sues with this project include unit mix and internal
layouts. Originally, planning staff 11' s discussed a greater mix of unit types on this site,
-9-
DRAFT
.
allowing more multiple family hou ing, with the expectation that a grcater amount of
Opcn space could he retained at sim.'lar densities as a result. 8.3 units per acre on a
townhouse design is very dense, an that density is reflected in the plan. Because of the
density, a hard lank can be expecte ,due both to tbe amount of building, and the relative
amount of paved surJaee. To accOl modate the proposal, very intense landscaping would
be expected in an attempt to sollcn t 1e hard look of 'he project. Alternative paving
materials in certain areas may also b-, considered to avoid the continual asphalt surLiCe.
.
Chair rrie advised of a resolution ad 'pted and approved by thc Planning Commission and
City Council in 1999 regarding park being placed under pOWcr lines. This resolution
denies aoy development where parks are proposed uuder power lines. Shawn Weinand.
applicaot. stated they were not aware of the problems when parks are placed below power
lincs and that they would not be placi g them in thosc areas now that they are aware of
the problem. He also stated they hav taken care of drive access Conccrns. Weinand
stated these units would sell in the up - er $130,000 to $ 170,000 range and that 50% of the
uni 's wo ul d be so I d to fam i Ii es. Sq ua e Jootages would be 9 lOon the first floor, 750 on
second floor {()t, 1700 total square f'oo finish. Weinand provided information on a similar
project in Otsego which was suecessf I and sta'ed they would like to have a mode! op in
September. starting with Phase I. Sin e there is both industrial and a mobile home park
surrounding this site, there will he ext nsive landscaping and buffering which hc feels
will improve the area and add density. Weinand also stated that they have designed this
project with standards that were previo Isly approved by the Planning Commission for the
Craig Scherber project across the fi-ee ay.
Frie asked if they had addressed the iss les as stated in the report regarding continuous
asphalt and park dedications, and Wein nd stated they have park land over on the
Remmele piece that they may incorpora e. They arc Proposiog 26 Il wide roadways but
could cut them back to 24 Il, gaining gr en space by eliminating Some nf'he paving. Ife
also stated they would not prefer mixing in masonry to the roadways as it Would be too
cxpensivc. These are totally maintenan e IJ-ee units in regard to siding and balconies_ all
utilities are to 'he back o/'tl,e houses, as ell as the additional landscaping. Weinand also
pointed out the side yard to the retail pie e and that some of the balconies encroach into
this area, but according to the ordinance le telt that this was allowable but wanted to
bring that to the Planning Commission' s 'lttention.
.
Robbie Smith sta'ed 'hat he would like th Planning Commission and slalfto look a' new
developments to make SUrc 'hat we attrac families with school age children to help the
school crisis. Herbst stated that they also need to be carcful not to mix lower value
housing in'o higher value housing areasjLst to try to help the schools out. and he felt that
they need to look at the development itsel and determine that it is a good quality
development. Frie added 'hat the Plannin' Commission and City Cnuncil have discussed
this previously and he feels that the standa ds tha' the city has put in place has driven the
housing costs up and that is what is keepin 1 Lunilies away.
-10-
DRt'.FT
Smith again asked the applicant wh t he would do as a developer to get housing that
people with lamilies cao a/lord and einand provided some scenarios. Weinand advised
the Planning Commission that he w( uld like to Come hack next month with preliminary
and linal plat as he feels they are at t e preliminary stage already. They have already
done their landscaping, roads, etc. einand would like the Planning Commission and
staff give thcm a positive go ahead to proceed.
.
Popilek asked GriUman about the sm' Iler entrance lor garbage tnreks and would this be
up to code and Grittmao stated this w uld have to be look at. Weinand advised that they
can widen them and alsn would like a pro val of the entraoce Irom the County Road.
Weinand stated this will be a privately maimained project with private streets and private
snow removal. The commissioners as -cd about density beiog too high and Grittman
stated it is high lor a townhouse projec , but he also stated that this is a PZM zoned
district and this allows higher density.
Dragsten also stated a concern with the square lootages wanted to make sure that these
were within the city's new standards as well. Popilek added that he lelt this would be a
very nice project lor PUD approval at tI is density. Weinand stated that they are
confident in this builder.
Consensus is to give Weinand their sup art and review the preliminary and final plat at
the next meeting. Weinand asked ifther' were any ICe/ings on the entrance to the Coumy
Road, double emrance or narrow emranc', and Dragsten stated they would have to meet
state guidelines which Weinand advised hat they do meet the requirements. Stalfis
push i ng lin 3 entrances per Gri ttman. H also stated sta n' was not in favor 0 r d i vi dcd
entrances, espec iall y i r it is a pub Ii c stree , but if it is a pri vate street [hey are in fa Vln.
.
They also put in two [at lots in separate a eas and Weinand added that [hey are proposing
a basketball COurt under the power lines t which Frie was quite adamam that it not be
placed there. Weinand also asked the Plm ning Commission if they lavored
developments lor lamilies or empty nester and they stated that growth was their issue.
.
-11-
~[Kl&
LaC TION MAP
NO SCALE OCELLO LLC
MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA
13229 r.\ u ~ 0 YY\ f\ D \'
f--" "0 q <<...,
1id
~~
._u....l'll:./'
t~t(;'~.[[.08S :-:~..,~
iODJ- ;;:; " ',--
r<~-'" ~
f........ ........
/ ........,
,
~ ,
, ,
:--.. ,
........ ........
'f1f........
, 'o~ "'" ........, '.,
~ ........ , ~~9
-........ ........ -ft
I /1 " 0, S.
"<:""'" ,,'/ I --':::;;:;:,....', '('9~
) ,J -, -, I ...
- ........ .:TO
, .........~ I , /"
" ,-.... - '"', ~ I ~1>
.... , ~ - - / '. , L...... . '.['.9S -
~ - !' I 1N")l(j3S'o'] I
, ~~ "~f!--~-'~. ;'~"".. /' --"'~9&'A:""'~
I . "--., 'l'l._. ~ ~ /",:::, ;;~l '_
-, '--....:. V - ~ / ..;;::;/ , "I, I - \. ..~ , \
__ ~~ ( ~ t -- -". ::-i:5'Z.. . - ~- a -,. ( , ( 1'1 ~d~~S~~ \ \/
"i'1I"\'J ?~~ / \ ",\1"1>$.. 11l11n \ /\
~g ~ " ') < . - ~~K 0 ~~<" ~:~ "'''''--\')\
- ~ 1d c(l (~' A 0 ~ p-:u-~~~~-- _ 1
. ts \ ~~. ~. . @:b ~~-, ~/ ~ \,72fJ ~"'~"'< \
. . ~ \1\ ~ < <. ~~~ '~
-~ \. ---,- ~ 0 (~ ' I~\J ~
- f!\lrM ", -~- -,," 0 < ~\ ~ /' /\ QO 'J '. ~/
- - s:t~. / ~ 0 1(0 .~~ -------,,___ o~. /-V~~-/Lb--\.;:s~_~~ /1/ \". \\.\ ~ . 0-
~J lAY .iff :\\\-:. (rl ------~----~<~~.
~ ~ t- rA ~r &\<<:) J L[ ."il:? rn 1 ~ .J~ s?
~~~~~':.'?t~ I ;.,; :T 0 '-., '\J 1 \: ~,.II \j IJ--l J 1-/l; 11 ~ ~~ s.
~ ~ ~~- ~t 0 ~-----_____ ~ -=t.K1 I lifT I,J. 1..1-
'>~ v (I , ~ ~~---~ ." '~~'\'I ~ ~ , lw I I I J rTotbftJ 'f!
':': -~~.' '.\I~ ~. ~<>, -- \"..- JL ~~~~ ~ rtl:1? /
~'/!-7~::\~ ~~..~ ~, '8 J~"~~ ~ -: d,.i: /
, h.1r \Y .. ~~ '\ /'---. A' /.' / 't I
- ",tY--" ',.,.' - ___ \ ~ ) ( \ ( M/ ~ 7 . I
~fi}~ II "';:~:I:;~-""~\lld ", - h / )~~\ \-j~t~~_ ,<) - /
'1:.:\--. I ~"-5)o ~ . ~(h~'~) ~'~ ~ "__ 0 ~'"
~ r ~ ,~:I'~,O;' I" 'l -.,~ 71. /1 ~I', ~ ~ h ~ '- --. (Ie ff I
-:. :-:!.- -IT"' " ~~'Yi/~'-'''' ;~ ~ " ~--II r(;J )" "C .- I
, ....
/. ~, ......-.....;
o
, "
~. .~, ." ~ ... / /
- - ~ ~ ""'" . "'~-.:: / - /. /
~\ 'X ~ ~~ J. ~~~ ~ ~"//) " ~ _ <---- / /
"
'.
~
1>'
~.9
) ''''
>
~
.
.
.
PARK DEDICA TIO N FUND FEE SUMMARY
(AS ( F 12/31/01)
PARK SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
PATHWA v DEDICATION (Park and/or Pathway Fees)
YEAR SUBDIVISION FEES FEES
1990 West Prairie Partners $1,720
1994 Cardinal Hills $13,385
1998 River Forest $32,500
1998 Wildwood Ridge $22,350
1999 Misc Subdivisions $4 ,800 $8,250
2000 Misc. ubdivisions 2 72
2001
S
Misc. Subdivisions
$8,8
$13,861
$35, 65
$46 644
$4 1 ,841
SUB-TOTAL REVENUE
$85 709
$100,938
$4 1 , 84 1
Less: Expenditures
Contribution to School District for Park I provements
(Cardinal Hills)
4 Acre Park Land Purchase on Monte Hi!
(Adjacent to Water Tower)
Retaining Wall @ Wildwood Ridge
Montissippi Park Trail
Trail Easement - Ken Shultz
Meadow Oak Pathway Addition
$9,400
$66,960
$3,218
$5,026
$1,764
$13,336
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
$99,704
BALANCE AVAILABLE
$128,784
DAWN/EXCELlRICKPARK DEDICATION SUMMARY:S/31/2002
Page
.
Sub) Weinand Townhouses
Date 06/19/2002 44741 PM Ce tral Daylight Time
From: S<:.F:ttlllan :;'lliiCJI,:.:I' ::;:(; UJ!l
To: JOneIi1492@aol=%~, Jeff OlleJlI@cl monticello mn LIS
Sent from the Internet (DF':tallsl
Following is a summary of my notes on the staff's review of the 167 unit townhouse project proposed by Se;
Weinand '
Land Use Staff discussed land use, a ,d whether residential was appropriate. It was concensus that the
residential use was not incompatible wi h mobile home park to the south, commercial to west, industrial to
north, and single family to east Howe er, proximity to mobile home park raised concerns about project
housing quality.
Traffic/Circulation: Discussion included comments that related to a more intuitive circulation through the
project As now drawn, a driver in the p oject would not be able to negotiate the street system and easily ge
an exit. Suggestions included realignin the streets and buildings in the center of the project to create a mal
understandable intersection. The cente area has several oddly angled intersections, combined with severa
driveways backing out into the middle 0 the intersections One design suggestion included the concept of a
loop road with spur streets to the perim ter access points, spacing the intersections to avoid conflicts with
driveways. Staff liked the constantly ch nging views created by the plan, but doesn't like the high number of
conflict areas.
It was also noted that the applicant shou, d be pursuing permission for the second access to Edmondson
(CR 117) with the County, and getting ve ification that the second access will be permitted. This concept will
supported by staff, but the developer is t make the request.
.
A third issue on street layout was potenti I conflicts with the gas line easement. It is staffs experience that If
gas company will permit 90 degree cros ings, but not the northerly Edmondson intersection design as shown
on the plan. The applicant should be dis ussing this with the gas company, and provide documentation that
the design will be approved.
With regard to parking, the plan should s ow additional visitor parking at the rate of one space per three unit~
scattered in small pockets throughout th project. The current plan shows only about half that amount. This
necessary since there will be no on-stree parking on the private streets.
Parks and Trails The plan is very tight, nd provides two small tot-lots, plus a "hot--shot" basketball court
along the southerly utility easements. St ff would prefer a more substantial tot lot area in the center of the
project, with more visibility from the surro nding streets. The Klein Farms park to the east should serve
adequately for larger activity needs. Also no play equipment should be located on the easement area.
The current plan shows a series of intern I trails that connect to School Boulevard near the driveway access,
Edmondson near the northern driveway a cess, and to the south along the utility easement. Staff would
recommend the following: internal trail c nnections that gain access to the northeast corner of the site at
School Boulevard and Edmondson, and t the southeast corner of the site at Edmondson and the UPA
easement that runs to the east south of K ein Farms The plan should be design so that individual units would
be within 200 feet of a trail that makes th se connections. Staff would recommend that a trail along
Edmondson be completed with the projec , but that this would be a part of the "trunk" pathway system to be
paid for, in part, out of City pathway funds Staff does not recommend sidewalks along internal streets due to
the impact on landscaping. '
Other Design Issues Staff believes that t justify the use of PUD, the project should include the following:
.
1. Brick elements on front of buildings
2. Texture-look roofing materials
3. Steeper roof pitches (6/12 to 8/12 or
4. Significant buffering from the mobile
density)
5. Emphasize elevation changes where
ore)
ome park and from the power lines on the south (both depth and
ossible to minimize impression of flatness
Thursday_ June 20. 002
America Online: JOneill498
Page 2 of2
6 Add a berm in landscape area along Edmondson, and meander this pathway though the planting area_
7 Ensure that all buildings, decks, porches, etc, meet minimum 30 foot setbacks
8 Hold phasing to maximum of 50 units before 2nd access is provided, and 100 units before 3rd access is .
provided,
9 Minimize impacts of paired 2-car driveways - wide expanses of driveway pavement
10, Ensure that homeowners association is strong and well funded to account for long-term maintenance,
11, Intensively landscape areas with high exposure to offset the impact of high-density, low open space
design.
12. Work with developer on facade of buildings to avoid plain, low-amenity design.
13. Be aware of small building separations, especially at rear.
14 Include large-planting landscaping in rear areas to mitigate site lines and soften views,
It is assumed by staff that these are two-story units. The additional vertical elements will help mitigate the
negative impact of the garage-front dominance, This needs to be confirmed.
This is the summary of my notes. Let me know if you would like further clarification of any of them.
-Steve G.
.
I
j
.
Thursday. June 20, 2002
America Online: JOnei1l498
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
MONTICELLO P
KS DEPARTMENT
WORK LIST
MAY 16 THRU JUNE 20
Ballfield maintenance
City Hall planter planted
Watering of sod and plant material
Mowing and weed eating
Playground equipment maintenanc
Cemetery bench installation and cl aring of vegetation
Chipping orders
Bathroom cleaning - clogging of toi ets
Garbage runs
Reset headstones knocked over fro vandalism at Riverside Cemetery
Continue mulching to help mowing fficiency
Ellison Park preparation for River F st
Ellison Park goose line installed
Flail mowed trail edge, Groveland
Removal of buck thorn from some ark areas
Irrigation maintenance and adjustm nt
Finished first of three projects at W st Bridge Park
Fertilizing and herbicide application
Sign maintenance - repair and varni h
Adjusted Hillcrest ballfield for MB
Adapted drags for MBA to use on fi Ids
Helped Community Center with tree removal
Modified existing garbage cans
Maintenance to maintenance shop I
Maintenance ofElIison Park's lock
Filling compost and chip bins
Flag replacement in cemeteries
Gopher problem addressed at Hillsid Cemetery
- ~" , ,._.~:""",' -':'-- -, -.-.......-
--............, ~....-,'., "''''--''-~'
-- .~----,_:,'~,,~::....-.....J/1.' ,._ ._.'^". _~ _._ _~...............~~,. _...
.
.
l=-
I. A.
B.
C.
D.
.
".t: .
II. r A.
\
~..B.
e.
D.
"~E.
ID. A.,
B.
e.
D.
E.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
MONTICELLO P RKS DEPARTMENT
2002 SUM ER SEASON
Safety on the job (daily reminder)
Teams thoughts and concerns/coor nate with other departments
Citizens concerns, questions and co plaints
Turf maintenance at parks and athle . c fields
Refuse maintenance
Vehicle and tool maintenance and r airs
Building and play equipment mainte ance
t......\-......<.t"'<:... S,'.....
Hard court inst~lation and . sh at West Bridge Park .
Wildwood/Rolling Hills Park
Fences around dumpsters
Pioneer oarking lot and buil . glbathrooms/gradinglpathway
SIJ.a...\.\~ \'1,,,,,-
'\;<;><:>....'<<..\\ ~ .\Ii!..~
Trail paving Meadow Oaks tr .1 and School Boulevard trail to 39 to
Wildwood addition
Irrigation installed at West B . dge Park-
Fences at East andW est Brid e - snowmobile deterrents
Automatic door latch at West ridge
Landscape cemetery entrance y flag (Riverside Cemetery)
Pathway East Bridge - moving bituminous materials - fall
4th Street paving rink
Groveland _
Restart irrigation at Par West _
Play area at 4th Street ADA ac ess/rinklbuilding roof
t'~ f)~ lr+ 00
"_".~""r--:~:=:=::~=."
~~~~~=====~.;~
.~-,.--_..,~...,-~....-
,,:6
..,~
."..._...'"._-_._~""-,..,
-_..~.~.--,.,
.,...~-~,,-~-,-~,~
~'''_._. "---..,-~.,,...
19
...
....
o
...
E
...
.~ ~ ~
"" E ""
00 ,,~
to-.: ~ : Vi
)( ;". ~ ~
E ;:.; n. 1!
~ e,' .,r)( ~ i
~ ~ r'I t ~
!!1:::) :::!~~ "'~~~
~!( ,,-.:.! B.!:l$~
'~i-> .,~'" ...!i-I!
tII) 't;;:.;j ... ~ - ii > Il '"
-Vlj~ .Ej~Jr.r~l~
..., '::;11 '2 8lci.l d E~ .
tl {j, :s b ]'::;) bEl ~ .~
lf~EOo V>~00 ~~1lI~
~- ~ .~ f JE ~I:~ i J ~ I ~ ~
l!' \i! ""1:E:a: .-.<2
Vii... ..
B
;t E
~
Q.
....
-
=
1 In
a
.~ .~ E
<L c:
"'l
""
)(
E
0
t;;.
0
N
... :::!
)(
~ ~
N
""
li
'"
..c:
,~ ~
g- ~
-~ 2-
"" . '"
.1:l ~ ~
c: Q. '"
~ g =
"'1 I!
l>O '"
. ~
q -c bI)
o i!l-ti
E -~ tt c
d:: 1 1U .Q
:-~1lI~
~E~~
~~~~
~
'"
Q.
Il
V>
..'I'
o .9
tII) ~ E j
s; N ...
'Vli '2 81 ci 11
~ ::;) b 1
GI i5iEOoE
E -.~-t~
~ii:i~~
.- ~:-lJ
N
.~
<L E
N
...:
)(
E
..,
~
'"
....
N
)( :::!
b .s ~i;"
"A-~ LfltQ
""" L .. <
S;~ll~ll_,
'Vli ..c:lj E :t :g
~ N ": <(
GI l>O 8lt!-~ ~
E .j ::;) b c: '3'
~v>EOoev>
.~~:iJ~~
11.!ij;:::E:a:&!,.,
e r
.... d
G;
v )(
;t E
..,
2i.
N
:q
)(
'" 0
P-~
.B ..
"" l>O
li a
~ Il
ij,V>
.~i
"'ij 5
-f;! g-
11 ;;
:::! .~:g
.8 g! ~
~~
q ~
~-ti
S ~ g
~ m '-8
N \11...!!
---~~
ffl~~
-
--
~
:::x:,....,:-:-':>~l!-
..,'......-
In
""
"l.
04
G;
.~
c:
E
"'
d
)(
E
..,
2i.
~
in
N
"
<>
N
... ~
>:
Jl .B
t!-
~,..
~
II E
...
.,;
"
E
..,
~
~
.
">-.
'"
'"
~
::i!
l>O ~ -E ~_
.i ~ ~ <
~ ilI!:i ~
i:; ::::) (:) c
J: E 00 E
" i:! E
....~1iDe
i :i~&!
tII) 2
s;
'j "2 )( ~
$!l ~ 0 g
..c: ~
"l;I !!1 on
s; ~-J
'" l>O
J: " c: E
.~ ~ ":
X- V> ill !:i l
'5
~ " ::;)0
'" E 00 E
:r
I s: :~ J ~
a
i :Ii :r '"
'\ .
~" '. ': '.
, "'.
'.' \.
r
.
Mountain" summit (Extreme)
.,,238 Aluminum uprights Price: $17.574
Minimum Use Zone: 41'3" x 46'6" (12.6m x 14.2m)
Child Capacity: 50-55 Recommended AgeS: 5 to 12
ADk Elevated: 4 Accessible: 4 Ground: 2 Types: 2
Transition
St@plink
MtgilrQck
Climber
Mountain" Peak (pictured) (Complete)
."237 Aluminum Uprights Price: $14;145
Minimum Use Zone: 34'4" x 45'9" (10.5m x 13.9m)
Child Capacity: 40.45 Recommended,.,..... 5 to 12
ADk Elevated: 3 Accessible: 3 Ground: 2 Types: 2
Me~arock
ClImber
Double
Seat
(Bolo\v)
Wl$hbont Slide
Mountain. Ridge (Basic)
.,,236 Aluminum uprights Price: $7,634
Minimum Use Zone: 34'3" x 28'4" (lOAm x 8.6m)
Child Capacity: 25.30 Recommended AgeS: 5 to 12
ADA:. Elevated: 2 Accessible: 2 Ground: 1 Types: 1
MegilrQCk
Climbtif
22
.
P1ayPalette Colors: Jungle
P1ayPalette Col<>l'5' Forest
P1ayPa\ett8 Colors: woods
rrw
I.
I
I
"
I
I
I
\',
I
I
\:,
!
Neighborhood. Park
#11709 Aluminum Uprights Price: $18,194
Minimum Use Zone: 51 '5" x 48'6" (l 5.7m x 14.8m)
Child Capacity: 55-60 Recommended Ages: 5 to 12
ADA: Elevated: S Accessible: 8 Ground: 3 Types: 3
Tid.1 Walle Slide
w/Endsoure
Neighborhood. Commons (pictured)
#11708 Aluminum Uprights Price: $14,586
Minimum Use Zone: 46'6" x 34'3" (14.2m x lOAm)
Child Capacity: 40-45 Recommended AgeS: 5 to 12
ADA: Elevated: 6 Accessible: 6 Ground: 3 Types: 2
Al'ldlDrsAWii'l
Panel
Piston PJ,"el
(Below)
Att~h~~nt
Neighborhood . Center
#11707 Aluminum Uprights Price: $8,615
Minimum Use lone: 26'8" x 39'6" (S.l m x 12.0m)
Child Capacity: 20-25 Recommended AgeS: 5 to 12
ADA: Elevated: 3 Accessible: 3 Ground: 1 Types: 1
AccesS
Attilchrl'u!!nt
2'Trill'\sitiol'l
$tep link
Twi$.ter
Climbet
38
PlayPalette Colors: Coastal
P1ayPalette Colors: Pavilion
1
.eam GT - Stadium (pictured) (Extreme)
....1259 Aluminum Uprights Price: $26,830
Minimum Use Zone: 34'10" x 58'S" (l0.6m x 17.8m)
Child Capacity: 80.85 Recommended Ages: 5 to 12
ADA:. Elevated: 14 Accessible: 11 Ground: 6 Types: 5
A<<:~$ibility Panel wI
CT Gtapl"lies
Turnlns:
Tran$itlon F~mn~l. Oridl.e
Sttp Unk w/Barrltr Rill
Team GT. Country club (Complete)
....1258 Aluminum Uprights PriCll: $20,211
Minimum Use Zone: 32'7" x 44'S" (9.9m x 13.5m)
child CapIIdtr- 45-50 Recommended Ages: 5 to 12
ADA:. Elevated: 7 Accessible: 7 Ground: 3 Types: 3
.
D<<omlvt ArdI P'I'l.1
Poly 10....
Wllnbonl SlIdt
Team GT . Playing Field (Basic)
.11257 Aluminum Uprights PriCll: $11,341
Minimum Use Zone: 34'10" x 42'11" (10.6m x l3.1m)
Child Capacity: 35-40 Recommended Ages: 5 to 12
ADA: Elevated: 5 Accessible: 5 Ground: 5 Types: 4
I
ThIln.ptIutk:
RioI'
.....
.,.,
5tr.ilht l-Iorizontll I"Chlnninl elr
l.&dder ~ I Slogl.
(147. An.c;nment) "'\J,
. i
rurnmIO.r. j
'II
Flip Slide
w/E"~ure
20
r
~.".'.
.
~.
TII,
Tube
~
, ,
1 j
PlayPlllette Colors: Patriot
..
~~
PlayPalette Colors: Parade
,;.:i'
i:....
r
,
f
PlaYPlllette Colors: Arctic
i
i
I ,~,n,.-.r 'J',\.,~:,' IF::r
~"I~'~,~.~-,,":,~'~j' .
"'''!!'';'~~;:!;:i.::_\I'''~"":
",..~.;...
Q)Ul
L Q)
"'..c::
UlU
~C
..c::,_
/,2' c:
Q)'-
Ie:
.:.<5:
uO
Q)..c::
/---- 0 en
:e
~
~
~
.
:0
E
~
E
~
g>
in
~~l'~.' ~....................
~rn ,,~.~
:gt5
0""
~ 0&
.....
"~\,',,.i~:k .
, ...... ,
. . . ......
l
." ,
.
~
Design 301
· Area required: 60'3" x 27'9" (18,36m x 8,46m)
· Recommended for 20 to 25 kids, ages 5-12 years
· Maximum fall height: 82" (2082mm)
· Elevated play components: 10
---
Minimum Use Zone
Turning Bar
SCALE, lIS" = 1'0"
Deck Heights are
Shown in inches
Chinnf Bar
Cor~scr8W
Single Wave Poly Slide
9
_J__
."...,~,._~.~,t,~t:t_c
__"_,<<t,~,._ ._
Design 34
· Area required: 34'4" X 34'4" (lOA6m x 10A6m)
· Recommended for 20 to 25 kids, ages 2-5 years
· Maximum fall height: 48" (1219mm)
· Elevated play components: 10
Deck Heights are
Shown in inches
\
Talk
Tube
" PHASE 1
"
"
PHASE 2
"
SCALE, 118" ~ 1'0'
Phase 1 includes a bubble where
tunnel attaches in phase 2.
HASE 1 ONLY
Area required: 25'8" x 23'2" (7,82m x 7,06m)
Recommended for 15 to 20 kids, ages 2-5 years
.. .,
r, II I
Design 306
#j C} $8" <;; d-t:-'
.
· Area required: 41'2" x 36' (12,54m x 10,97m)
· Recommended for 35 to 40 kids, ages 5-12 y ars
· Maximum fall height: 64" (1626mm)
· Elevated play components: 13
Phase 1 includes the
Slide Winder2 which is
moved when/If phase
2 is added.
Swings
Swings offer one of the best
opportunities for kids to develop
balance and coordination. Our
Swings' ultra-safe seats are
attached to chains with
long-wearing, pinch~free bolt
links or double clevises that are
much safer than "S" hooks.
.. Arch Swing
. Excellent swing for infants and toddlers
. Constructed with maintenance-free
bearings and TenderTuff@-coated chains
. Comes with fUll-bucket seats
. Beam height is 7'
. Choose any TenderTuff color for chain
100048A Arch Swing
$1.200 2161bs.
Minimum Area Required: 23'8" x 28'
(7,21 m x 8,53 m)
Maximum Fall Height: 84" (2,13 m)
.. Arch Belt Swing
. Includes two belt swings per bay
. PlayBooster@ 5"-diameter aluminum
arch posts ensure maximum strength
and durability
. Can be extended to add more swing bays
(add 17'6" x 32' use zone per additional bay)
. Available with TenderTuff-coated
or uncoated galvanized chain
100050A Arch Belt Swing, Single-Bay
TenderTuff.coated Chain
$1,725 2091bs.
100050C Arch Belt Swing, Single-Bay
Galvanized Chain
$1.675 203/bs.
Minimum Area Required: 24'5" x 32'
(7,44 m x 9,75 m)
Maximum Fall Height: 96" (2,44 m)
NOTE: ArCh Belt Swing shown at right is a dOuble bay.
.. Slash-Proof Belt Seat
. Weather- resistant, durable rubber seat
features impact-absorbing edge
. EnclOses a stainless spring-steel insert
for maximum safety, durability
and vandal resistance
'Ct
l-aaa-4FUNLSI
WWw.p/aylsl.com
.~;;.~t,~f''O''T'' ~_.
~<ONom"",r.m""'m;o""".
Conllquratlon Model No. No. Swings Mini um Area Required Maximum rail Height ..... Toddler Swings
wm 1228376 2 24'1" x 32' 96" (2,44 m) . 3 Yz" galvanized steel beam is sUpported
(7, 0 m x 9,75 m) by a 5" steel upright
fU U~U Dl 1228370 4 . Complete with two full'bucket seat
96" (2,44 m) 1179628 Toddler SWings
fO U~U U~U UJ 122837F 6 $790 1531bs.
96" (2,44 m) Minimum Area Required: 17' x 21'9"
(5,18 m x 6,63 m)
Maximum Fall Height: 74" (1,88 m)
.. Single Post Swings
. Economical and requires less space than larger
swing systems
. Includes two Swings per bay
. Available with TenderTuW)'coated chain
or galvanized chain
1228378 2 Swings, TenderTuff-coated Chain
$804 2291bs.
1228370 4 Swings, TenderTuff-coated Chain
$1,440 377 Ibs.
122837F 6 Swings, TenderTuff-coated Chain
$2,092 518 Ibs.
f
124
':'F':''':,:<':''::'''''':':'::.':'':::::::'
'i'~.=.e"~o
.....'+1... "i. '. .2:..... ltl '+-
"'W ....
WllI::rt 0'1 c::
'," .......'....;.;:1.'...,..]2...... .... ...'....'...r........ ;......~...~..
......::::1...... ,~,.................ltl. ......,Q) CL.32.
,.Hv'!E "'x >
,', Jti ""0lQ) Q) 0
"" ,.,'......,:::;J ...::t:.. ....
ic::.;f2 Q)"O :ft CL
.!!f!b ~ Ql g ID
Q; ~. !D.2: '-0
'." E :l ... LL. 0'1 ==
''',:0 'In'..c.. 3Vl
',.'U~ 0 0.....
.::0:<1; *.... .!Ii' >. .~
"2', "l2if',/ :3 Q) Q....
i~'~;".>~.~.......t:: .'lil..,.Q).~
i..~..",.'...E."'..... :,'",.'.,.i,.,....(..~.'.... ,....,'.~......,..Ol.:, ..0.1 .:.;::;;
i'ile"""'" ......Q) 1Il v
y,J;;~;'''''J'~.t:n; . ~. al
W!ei\;i.."",.."....,...Ci.:"g,iE ~ 1:
;:5('ic.-.-,,;q;lil::;P t1I 0......
",~:,.:;;;,.:':,I,f:,'::::.:?'::~~','::::~,:::'"I<:." .. .,
,
I 1= m g:
I .~;g ~
':;;;1',1)0
</) 1;
/
/
--
,/
/
/
......---............_--~ ;
~~~~
ti~~~
</) :::>
'i"'i'
lS>t'-;
>< \3)
~ ><
'<t ~
'\3)
~~
~~
>< ><
~g
Ci
"0
oj ~ t2
-<
c:: If) UI
0 ..
~ j <
Ql i
ili j;
)
/
(
I
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
(
I
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
.,
..",
3!-'"
"'~
~~
"
'c t
E-5 I'
i!::CL
u::
9~ I
g~ "..
--' .
'-
I
I
I
511 0.0. SIrtGlE BAY
SWING G'!DID
ACTUAL S,ZE:
M,N. AREA REa'D:
, W"G~
4'6/1 X 13'0/1 (1.4M X 4M)
32' X 25'0/1 (8.8M X 7.6M)
568 L6S. (258KG)
1
:'..;
f'l.}'
~
f1""
T ,
511 0.0. SINGLE BAY ARCH
SWING cmtImi)
ACTUAL S,ZE:
.~EA REQ'D:
4'6/1 X 13'0/1 (1.4M X 4M)
32' X 25'0/1 (8.8M X 7.6M)
417 L65. (188KG)
-
-"~.
511 0.0. DOUBLE BAY
SWING GmImt
ACTUAL S,ZE: 4'6/1 x 25'6" (104M X 7.8M)
MIN. AREA REQ'D: 32' X 37'6/1 (8.8M X 11.5M)
WEIGHT: 828 L65. (421KG)
..
j
.
.
.
Dawn,
I received a call from Sue Johnson (878-2051) co wdinator with the Girl SCOllts, along with
Melissa Bryant, who wanted to bein touch with tle City regarding plantings at Ellison Park, I
gave her Adam's name but she has talked with hill already and said that she used to work with
Wanda also to keep in touch regarding purchasin seeds, etc, and reimbursement through the
City. She said shejust wanted someone at the Ci y to be aware of their planting schedules, etc.
so that they weren't interfering with anything tha the City might be planning in the parlc
According to Adam, he is up to speed on this pro ram (Adopt a Park) and he will be looking for
the line item in the budget regarding reimbursem nts,
Maybe this is something that the Parks Commission needs to discuss at one of their meetings.
am unfamiliar with any of this so I told her I WOLl d pass this along to the Parks Commission.
She did also comment on how pleasant it is work'ng with Adam and wanted to pass that along,
Thanks,
Lori