Planning Commission Minutes 10-02-2018MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION
Tuesday, October 2nd, 2018 - 6:00 p.m.
Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center
Commissioners Present: Brad Fyle, Sam Murdoff, Marc Simpson, John Alstad, Katie
Peterson
Council Liaison Present: Charlotte Gabler
Staff Present: Angela Schumann, Steve Grittman (NAC)
1. General Business
A. Call to Order
Brad Fyle called the meeting of the Planning Commission to order at 6:00 p.m.
B. Consideration of approving minutes
a. Regular Meeting Minutes — August 7, 2018
MARC SIMPSON MOVED TO APPROVE THE REGULAR
MEETING MINUTES OF AUGUST 7, 2018. KATIE PETERSON
SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED, 4-0-1 WITH
SAM MURDOFF ABSENT DURING THE MOTION.
b. Special Meeting Minutes — August 7, 2018
MARC SIMPSON MOVED TO APPROVE THE SPECIAL
MEETING MINUTES OF AUGUST 7, 2018. KATIE PETERSON
SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED, 4-0-1 WITH
SAM MURDOFF ABSENT DURING THE MOTION.
c. Special Meeting Minutes — September 4, 2018
KATIE PETERSON MOVED TO APPROVE THE SPECIAL
MEETING MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 4, 2018. MARC SIMPSON
SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED, 4-0-1 WITH
SAM MURDOFF ABSENT DURING THE MOTION.
C. Citizen Comments
None.
D. Consideration of adding items to the agenda
None.
E. Consideration to approve agenda
N/A.
2. Public Hearings
Sam Murdoff joined the meeting.
A. Public Hearing - Consideration of a request for Comprehensive Plan
Amendment from `Places to Shop' to `Places to Live' and a request for
Zoning Map Amendment for Rezoning from B-4 (Regional Business District)
Planning Commission Minutes — October 2, 2018 Page 1 1 6
to R-4 (Medium -High Residence Density Residence District) for a 125 unit
senior living development.
Applicant: Headwaters Development — Michael Hoagberg
Steve Grittman introduced the application and indicated that if approved, the
applicants would need a Conditional Use Permit for a multi -family development
in the R-4 District. The proposal estimated about 125 mixed senior living units
with construction being completed in two phases. The first phase would include
about 92 units with future phase of 33 units.
Grittman provided the history of the plat noting that the area was currently guided
and zoned commercial.
Grittman summarized the zoning ordinance and comprehensive plan standards for
map and text amendments.
The Comprehensive Plan has a number of objectives that relate to how land use is
be developed in the community. Grittman noted that it explains the need for
additional senior housing.
Grittman also noted that there are a number of vacant commercial parcels near the
site that have remained under or undeveloped.
Grittman summarized the importance of having transitional uses between two
zoning districts and explained that senior housing may be a suitable use. It was
noted that senior living facilities are not as intense of a use as other high density
residential projects and have relatively lower traffic impacts compared to
commercial developments.
Grittman then went into further detail about the parking and noted that the
applicant provided onsite parking. He explained that the amount of greenspace
provided exceeded a commercial project, which typically consume 80-85 percent
of the land with hard surface. He said that typically senior living uses require 1 to
1.5 stalls per unit, but most of the parking is used by visitors or staff.
Grittman stated that the site is located in the Mississippi River Wild and Scenic
District and has additional review factors such as height limitations. It was noted
that a variance may be required if the building exceeds 25 feet, but that staff
would need to confirm the requirement.
City staff recommended approval of the application.
Grittman stated that the developer would need to make some sight plan changes
including shifting the buildings to meet the R-4 standards.
Sam Murdoff asked why the Wild and Scenic District height would possibly not
apply. Grittman explained that it had to do with the timing of the implementation
of the ordinance. He stated that if it was zoned or guided for commercial uses
after the time the City adopted the special district, then a 25 feet restriction would
be in place. Staff would complete more research.
Planning Commission Minutes — October 2, 2018 Page 2 16
Charlotte Gabler also asked about the timing for implementation of the Wild and
Scenic District. She asked about the Highway 25 Coalition and if there has been
any selections for where a possibly new bridge overpass would be located. Angela
Schumann indicated that the coalition is investigating five options and will need
to finalize their review in the next year.
Brad Fyle opened the public hearing and invited the applicants to speak first.
Michael Hoagberg, Headwaters Development, introduced himself. He briefly
mentioned the considerations for this project in Monticello. He explained the
importance of keeping the natural components on site and stated that sixty percent
of the site would remain green space. He also summarized that the use would be a
good transitional use from retail to residential. He also explained the importance
of the appeal of the building and being a good fit into the community.
Marc Simpson asked how many other complexes the company owns and/or
operates. Hoagberg responded that this would be their fifth community with their
newest and closest facility in Eagan.
Hoagberg added that the developers held a neighborhood meeting for property
owners within 500 feet of the proposed development. Hoagberg stated that those
comments would be incorporated in the final site plan and design if possible.
Sam Murdoff asked how the developer decided on this property. Hoagberg cited
personal connections to the current owners. Hoagberg also added that they wanted
to expand to the northwest metro area and Monticello fit a lot of the criteria they
were looking for in a site. Murdoff asked if the developer has looked at other sites
in Monticello. Hoagberg declined.
Katie Peterson asked where the clientele would be coming from. Hoagberg stated
that they would estimate 2/3rds of residents would come from Monticello or the
surrounding area. Peterson asked if traffic was a concern. Hoagberg stated that
traffic was a concern, but was manageable.
Simpson asked when they completed the market study. Hoagberg stated it was
completed in the last six months and was validated by a third -party.
Peterson asked if there was any concerns of noise. Hoagberg stated that was a
consideration and would be accommodated. The use of higher proof windows was
a mitigation example.
Murdoff asked how the developer would deal with the regulations of the Wild and
Scenic regulations. Hoagberg stated that they needed to see what the DNR came
back with. He mentioned the importance of having three stories and maintaining
adequate green space. Murdoff asked about how they would meet the other
setbacks. Hoagberg noted that they would meet all of the setbacks for property.
Fyle asked about the future phase timing. Hoagberg estimated the earliest would
be five years from the completion of the first phase.
Planning Commission Minutes — October 2, 2018 Page 3 1 6
Peterson asked about the type of amenities offered at the facility. Hoagberg
explained that the facility would offer full service dining/kitchen, spa, fitness
center, theatre, and community spaces.
Simpson asked about the capacity of St. Benedicts. Schumann stated that they
could provide that information to the Commission at a future meeting.
Roger Pribyl, 6184 Mill Run Road, had concerns with traffic, the intersection of
Hart Boulevard and County Road 39, street lighting, and the speed limit on
Country Road 75. He believed there were other areas that this development could
locate. Pribyl also noted that the vacant lot and other lots in the vicinity have not
been mowed.
Angela Schumann entered into the record that a public comment letter was
received from Trident Development, Tealwood Senior Living, and Mielke
Development. This letter was distributed to the commissioners.
Charlotte Gabler asked if the proposed amendment to Comprehensive Plan would
change the total acreage of commercial. Grittman noted that only the five acre
parcel would be converted. Gabler asked if any other R-4 zoning districts are
located in the city other than Monticello Crossings/IRET. Grittman declined.
Gabler asked if the applicant has toured any other sites in Monticello. Hoagberg
stated that he has seen the progression of the City and has seen vacant lots in
Monticello, but would like to use this site for development. Gabler asked if
Hoagberg was familiar with the Highway 25 Coalition planning. Hoagberg
confirmed. Gabler asked if the developer would be interested in partnering with
the city to increase safety near the site. Hoagberg said that they would be open to
it.
Gabler asked why a concept design meeting was not held. Schumann summarized
that option was only available for Planned Unit Development.
Schumann explained that the consulting engineer (WSB) submitted a comment
letter that addressed configuration concerns with the intersection of Country Road
39 and Hart Boulevard.
Fyle had concerns with left hand turns unto the site and traffic. Hoagberg stated
that the design was only a concept and they would be flexible.
Peterson asked what would happen if the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and
Rezoning would pass, but the senior living development would fall through.
Grittman stated that the next step for any developer would be for a Conditional
Use Permit, which would allow the City Council authority on any proposal.
Hearing no further comments, the public hearing was closed.
Murdoff summarized that in his view this was not the right place for a senior
living facility and was worried about removing a commercial zone, especially as
Monticello continues to grow.
Planning Commission Minutes — October 2, 2018 Page 4 16
Simpson reiterated increased traffic concerns and agreed that it was not the best
location for a senior living facility.
Katie Peterson asked for the history of zoning requests for the site. Grittman
explained before the Zoning Ordinance was updated in 2010, the previous code
identified the areas as PZM (Performance Zone Mix), which allowed either
commercial or high density residential. All of the PZM district was converted to
commercial with the update.
Peterson noted concerns with traffic, but recognized that a development would
eventually occur. She asked if it would be a problem if vehicles cut through the
private street. Grittman stated that it would be an owner issue.
Decision 1: Resolution of Recommendation for Comprehensive Plan
amendment reclassifying the subject property from "Places to Shop" to
"Places to Live", and Rezoning to R-4, Medium -High Density Residential.
SAM MURDOFF MOVED TO DENY RESOLUTION 2018-027
RECOMMENDING A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
RECLASSIFYING THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM "PLACES TO SHOP"
TO "PLACES TO LIVE", AND REZONING TO R-41 MEDIUM-HIGH
DENSITY RESIDENTIAL, BASED ON FINDINGS OF NON -CONGRUENCE
WITH THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. MARC SIMPSON
SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED, 4-1 WITH BRAD FYLE IN
OPPOSITION.
3. Regular Agenda
A. Consideration of the Community Development Directors Report
Angela Schumann provided the Community Development Directors Report.
Schumann provided an update on a request the City received regarding the sign
ordinance for dynamic displays in residential districts. Schumann stated that staff
would put together information where civic and institutional uses are located in
the city and what zoning districts they are located in. Then, the Planning
Commission could decide if they would like to call for a Public Hearing to amend
the Monticello Zoning Ordinance.
Marc Simpson asked when the new liquor sign would be placed. Schumann
estimated this fall. Charlotte Gabler asked when the street banners would be
installed. Schumann explained the banner project and estimated a fall timeline.
Simpson asked when Chelsea Road be opened. Schumann noted November.
4. Added Items
N/A.
5. Adjournment
SAM MURDOFF MOVED TO ADJOURN THE MEETING AT 7:52 P.M. KATIE
PETERSON SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED, 5-0.
Planning Commission Minutes — October 2, 2018 Page 5 16
Recorder: Jacob Thunander
Approved: November 5, 2018,,
Angela SchuWa#n, %ommunity Development Director
Planning Commission Minutes — October 2, 2018 Page 6 16