Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
City Council Agenda Packet 11-26-2018
AGENDA REGULAR MEETING — MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, November 26, 2018 — 6:30 p.m. Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING Academy Room 5:45 p.m. 5:45 p.m. Budget Workshop Mayor: Brian Stumpf Council Members: Jim Davidson, Bill Fair, Charlotte Gabler, Lloyd Hilgart 1. General Business A. Call to Order & Pledge of Allegiance B. Approval of Agenda — Councilmembers or the City Administrator may add items to the agenda for discussion purposes or approval. The City Council may or may not take official action on items added to the agenda. C. Approval of Meeting Minutes • Special Meeting Minutes from November 13, 2018 • Regular Meeting Minutes from November 13, 2018 D. Citizen Comments — Individuals may address the City Council about any item not contained on the agenda. Each speaker will be allotted three minutes with a maximum of five speakers. The Mayor may allow for additional time and/or speakers. The City Council generally takes no official action of items discussed, with the exception of referral to staff for future report. E. Public Service Announcements/Updates • Indoor Farmer Market on December 1 • Sign up for E -News F. Council Liaison Updates • EDA G. Department Updates • City Administrator Update • EDA Update (Jim Thares) 2. Consent Agenda — All items listed on the Consent Agenda are considered standard or may not need discussion prior to approval. These items are acted upon by one motion unless a councilmember, the city administrator, or a citizen requests the item by removed from consent for additional discussion. A. Consideration of approving payment of bills B. Consideration of approving new hires and departures for City departments C. Consideration of approving the sale/disposal of surplus city property D. Consideration of approving an application for a temporary charitable gambling permit for a raffle to be conducted on February 8, 2019 by Central Minnesota Jobs and Training Services, Inc. at River City Extreme, 3875 School Blvd. E. Consideration of approving an application for a temporary charitable gambling permit for a raffle to be conducted by the Wright County Pheasants Forever at River City Extreme, 3875 School Blvd. in conjunction with their Annual Membership Banquet on April 6, 2019 F. Consideration of approving a Special Event Permit for outdoor entertainment at River City Extreme, 3875 School Blvd. on July 12, 2019 G. Consideration of renewing a pawn broker license for 2019 for David Corbin dba Monticello Pawn, Gun and Bargain Center at 1219 South Highway 25 H. Consideration of approving a contract with the Wright County Assessor's Office for 2020-2021 assessing services I. Consideration of approving Resolution 2018-93 accepting a donation of $600 from RiverWood Bank for extrication gloves for the Fire Department 2A. Consideration of items removed from the consent agenda for discussion 3. Public Hearings 4. Regular Agenda A. Consideration of issuing a Negative Declaration of Need for an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the proposed Haven Ridge development 5. Added Items 6. Adjournment AGENDA CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, November 26, 2018 — 5:45 p.m. Academy Room, MCC AGENDA 1. Call to Order 2. 5:45 p.m. Budget Workshop 3. Adjournment MINUTES SPECIAL MEETING — MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, November 13, 2018 — 4:45 p.m. Bridge Room City Hall - Monticello Community Center Present: Brian Stumpf, Jim Davidson, Bill Fair, Charlotte Gabler, Lloyd Hilgart Absent: None Others: City staff. Jeff O'Neill, Wayne Oberg, Angela Schumann, Rachel Leonard, Tom Pawelk, Jim Thares, Shibani Bisson and Jennifer Schreiber Others: Eva Kelly and Jason Amberg, WSB & Associates, and Wes Olson and Mike Bennedetto, Monticello Lions Club 1. Call to Order Mayor Brian Stumpf called the special meeting to order at 4:45 p.m. 2. Splash Pad Discussion Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator, introduced the item. Jason Amberg and Eva Kelly, WSB & Associates, were in attendance to present the splash pad feasibility study. The presentation reviewed the purpose of the study, the process, location analysis, two concept options, vendor systems, the preferred concept, and the cost. The preferred concept selected was Concept #1 — Central. It included items such as access to School Boulevard, a new parking lot, a looped road and area for buses, and utilized existing shelter and mature trees. The total estimated cost was $832,000. Jason Amberg noted all cost estimates were based on typical construction costs. Project construction would be expected to take five to six months. Following the presentation of the feasibility study and selected concept, Tom Pawelk, Parks Superintendent, presented a phased option with a reduced initial cost to $663,673. This phased option eliminated line items that could be completed at a later time. Mayor Stumpf commented that although costs are delayed, the city is ultimately responsible for funding those items. Discussion ensued. Councilmember Gabler commented that it would be beneficial to see how the splash pad is utilized before building out the road and parking lot. Mayor Stumpf expressed concern about the cost and questioned the source of needed funding. It was concluded that the project could be funded by reserves. The Council expressed concern about the high cost of the project since it was initially thought to cost approximately $300,000. In addition, there is the annual operations and maintenance costs of approximately $30,000 that would need to be funded. Wes Olson and Mike Bennedetto, Monticello Lions members, commented on the project. The Lions had originally agreed to contribute $150,000 when the project was anticipated to cost $300,000. WSB noted in the feasibility study that $300,000 would cover the cost of the splash pad alone and did not include site improvement costs. Wes Olson felt that there were items in the feasibility study that increased cost unnecessarily. Mike Bennedetto added that by deleting unnecessary items and doing some of the work in- house the cost could be reduced significantly. He mentioned the Lions would never have City Council Special Meeting Minutes — November 13, 2018 initiated the project if they thought the cost would be around $800,000. The Lions agreed to dedicate $165,000 to the project and mentioned if the city matched that amount and contributed an additional $120,000 for parking the project could be capped at $450,000. The $450,000 would be adequate if some of the line items were eliminated. WSB responded by reaffirming their recommendation of the included line items. Councilmember Hilgart noted his opposition to the project. He was opposed because of the increase in cost and the fact that residents' property taxes were increasing by double digits for 2019 and most likely 2020. Councilmember Davidson expressed his concern with the project because of current projects that would benefit from the same funds. Projects mentioned were the Bertram Chain of Lakes project, downtown development projects, or anew public works facility. Councilmember Gabler expressed an idea that perhaps the splash pad should happen before more money is put towards Bertram Chain of Lakes because the splash pad impacts everyone and Bertram affects users. Both Councilmembers Davidson and Hilgart disagreed and noted Bertram is for all age levels and the splash pad is for just young ages. Councilmember Fair moved to direct staff to review the feasibility study, remove unnecessary items, review funding sources, and bring back to the City Council for approval. Councilmember Gabler seconded the motion contingent on a friendly amendment to set the cost of the splash pad at an amount not to exceed $450,000. Councilmember Fair did not accept the friendly amendment, so there was no second. His motion died for lack of a second. There was further discussion related to the project cost and funding source. The City Council expressed concern about moving forward due to ongoing unanswered questions, including the financial effect of Xcel Energy devaluation and the cost of the Bertram Chain of Lakes project which will be bid after January 1. Mayor Stumpf asked if there was support for the project moving forward. There were neither additional comments nor direction by the City Council. The splash pad project did not moved forward. 3. Adjournment By consensus the meeting was adjourned at 6 p.m. Recorder: Jennifer Schreiber _ Approved: Attest: City Administrator City Council Special Meeting Minutes — November 13, 2018 REGULAR MEETING — MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, November 13, 2018 — 6:30 p.m. Bridge Room, Monticello Community Center Present: Mayor Brian Stumpf, Jim Davidson, Bill Fair, Charlotte Gabler, and Lloyd Hilgart Absent: None 1. General Business A. Call to Order & Pledge of AlleLiance Mayor Stumpf called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. B. Approval of Auenda Councilmember Gabler moved to approve the agenda with the amendment to table 2H and 2I. Councilmember Hilgart seconded. Motion carried unanimously. C. Approval of Minutes Regular Meeting Minutes from October 22, 2018 Councilmember Fair moved approval of the regular meeting minutes of October 22, 2018. Councilmember Hilgart seconded. Motion carried unanimously. D. Citizen Comments • None. E. Public Service Announcements • Winter parking begins November 15. • Thanksgiving hours. All city offices will be closed on Thursday, November 22. The DMV, MCC, and Hi -Way Liquors will be open regular business hours on Friday, November 23. • Construction Update — Shibani Bisson noted that the Fallon Avenue Bridge will be open to traffic on November 21 end of day. F. Council Liaison Updates • Highway 25 Coalition — Mayor Stumpf noted that the coalition has not agreed on preferred sites and will revisit the issue after January 1. • BCOL — the group received a draft traffic study, county plans for campground, and information on 2020 funding from the next round of Legacy Grant. • IEDC — Mayor Stumpf noted that the commission had two resignations. The meeting included discussion on the new industry of the year format, affordable housing, workforce and daycare, and the Tiger Path event in Hutchinson. City Council Minutes — November 13, 2018 Page 1 1 3 • Planning Commission — Councilmember Gabler commented on the Planning Commission meeting which included a variance for a side yard setback and a rezoning in the CCD district. G. Department Updates Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator, gave an update on the following: 1. The first round of the Stop For Me Campaign went well. The campaign will continue on Broadway on November 15 at 2 p.m. 2. The final meeting of Fire Station plans will be on November 14. The plans will then be brought to the City Council for approval. 3. A report was provided from a consultant regarding potential for LGA which doesn't look like it will be a good option for replacement of lost revenue from Xcel Energy. Looking at working with Xcel Energy to establish market values based on production. 4. The Monticello School District conducted their long term planning and goals session. 2. Consent Agenda: Councilmember Gabler moved approval of the Consent Agenda with 2H and 2I being tabled. Councilmember Davidson seconded. Motion carried unanimously. A. Consideration of approving the payment of bills. Recommendation: Approved the bill and purchase card registers for a total amount of $3,289,646.52. B. Consideration of approving new hires/departures. Recommendation: Approved the hires for MCC and the terminations for MCC and Parks. C. Consideration of approving the sale/disposal of surplus city property. Recommendation: No report this cycle. D. Consideration of canvassing the returns and adopting Resolution 2018-90 declaring the results of the 2018 General Election for the City of Monticello offices. Recommendation: Adopted Resolution 2018-90 accepting the canvass of votes for the 2018 General Election. E. Consideration of approving the Walnut Street Corridor Plan. Recommendation: Accepted the Walnut Street Corridor Plan. F. Consideration of authorizing Bolton and Menk to provide design and construction engineering services at an amount not to exceed $31,687 for the Walnut Street Improvement project. Recommendation: Authorized Bolton and Menk to provide design and construction services at a not to exceed price of $31,687 for the 2019 Walnut Street Improvement project. G. Consideration of approving a columbarium-ossuary from Eickhof Columbarium for the sum of $52,000 plus improvement costs of $8,000 and approve the sale of 50 ossuary slots to CentraCare Health, Monticello. Recommendation: Approved purchasing a columbarium-ossuary from Eickhof Columbarium for $52,000 plus improvement costs of $8,000 and approved the sale of 50 ossuary slots to CentraCare Health, Monticello. City Council Minutes — November 13, 2018 Page 2 1 3 H. Consideration of lease agreement between City of Monticello Parks Department and the City of Monticello EDA for 349 West Broadway (Fred's Auto). Recommendation: Item was tabled. I. Consideration of approving a request for Conditional Use Permit for Public Use in the F-3 sub -district of the CCD — Central Community District. Recommendation: Item was tabled. 3. Regular Agenda: A. Consideration of adopting 2018-91 approving plans and specifications and authorizing advertisement of bids for Bertram Chain of Lakes Athletic Complex Phase I project. Tom Pawelk, Parks Superintendent, introduced the item. Jason Amberg, WSB, gave a brief presentation with included: a review of the master plan; phase I goals; design process; site diagrams; cost estimate (including maintenance); and schedule of project. The estimated cost of the project is $2,439,625.40. It was noted that are add on items if the bids come in lower than expected. Mayor Stumpf questioned whether lighting expenses could be funded out of franchise fee. Wayne Oberg responded that lighting for road and parking lot could be funded out of franchise fee. The project is planned to be bid in January with bids coming in late February and construction taking place March — August 2019 with majority of the project complete by October 19. Maintenance costs are estimated at $97,861/annually. Currently maintenance is $31,000/annually for interim fields. Councilmember Gabler questioned the amount of revenue that will be generated. Tom Pawelk responded that revenue is estimated at $14,000/annually for general use and does not include tournaments. Minimal discussion took place in regard to grading, boundaries, and location of trees. Councilmember Fair moved approval of Resolution 2018-91 approving plans and specifications and authorizing the advertisement for bids for improvements at the Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Athletic Park. Councilmember Hilgart seconded. Motion carried unanimously. 4. Adiournment: By consensus, the meeting was adjourned at 7:19 p.m. Recorder: Jennifer Schreiber Approved: Attest: City Administrator City Council Minutes — November 13, 2018 Page 3 1 3 City Council Agenda: 11/26/2018 2A. Consideration of avvrovin2 vavment of bills (WO) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: City staff submits the attached bill registers and purchasing card registers for approval by Council. The bill registers contain all invoices processed and the purchasing card registers contain all card purchases made since the last Council meeting. Subject to MN Statutes, most invoices require Council approval prior to releasing checks for payment. The day following Council approval, payments will be released unless directed otherwise. A credit purchasing agreement and policy was approved by Council initially and card purchases must comply with the policy. If Council has no questions or comments on the bill and purchase card registers, these can be approved with the consent agenda. If requested, this item can be removed from consent and discussed prior to making a motion for approval. Al. Budget Impact: None A2. Staff Workload Impact: No additional work required. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the bill and purchase card registers for a total amount of $2,024,703.89. 2. Motion to approve the registers with changes directed by Council. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends Alternative #1 or #2, per direction of Council. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • Bill registers and Purchase Card registers Accounts Payable ITIr�' OF Computer Check Proof List by Vendor iff( Moiiiiffo � User: Debbie.Davidson Printed: 11/19/2018 - 4:23PM Batch: 00201.11.2018 - 201.11.2018 US Bank Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Vendor: 4263 CAYAN Check Sequence: 1 ACH Enabled: True 818973 Oct. 2018 (3) Genius Servie Fee - cc machine rei 89.85 11/15/2018 609-49754-424100 818973 (13,463) Oct. 2018 Transaction Fee 942.41 11/15/2018 609-49754-443980 Check Total: 1,032.26 Vendor: 4394 DAXKO, LLC Check Sequence: 2 ACH Enabled: True 34775 PWC CC Gateway Fee - Oct 115.90 11/15/2018 226-45122-443980 Check Total: 115.90 Vendor: 3241 LINCOLN FINANCIAL GROUP Check Sequence: 3 ACH Enabled: True 11/01/2018 November 2018 1,849.46 11/15/2018 101-00000-217066 Check Total: 1,849.46 Vendor: 4732 MONEY MOVERS, INC. Check Sequence: 4 ACH Enabled: True 113605 Fitness Rewards - Oct 2018 60.75 11/15/2018 226-45122-430900 Check Total: 60.75 Vendor: 1426 CITY OF MONTICELLO Check Sequence: 5 ACH Enabled: True UB Sept 2018 5002 - 1510 Hart Blvd sprinkler 12.65 11/15/2018 101-43120-438200 UB Sept 2018 5003 - 1460 Hart Blvd sprinkler 5.45 11/15/2018 101-43120-438200 UB Sept 2018 5004 - 1390 Hart Blvd sprinkler 40.59 11/15/2018 101-43120-438200 UB Sept 2018 5005 - 822 Hart Blvd sprinkler 16.46 11/15/2018 101-43120-438200 UB Sept 2018 5026 - Ellison Park 73.15 11/15/2018 101-45201-438200 UB Sept 2018 5248 - BridgePark sprinkler 178.44 11/15/2018 101-45201-438200 UB Sept 2018 5249 - BridgePark W sprinkler 215.02 11/15/2018 101-45201-438200 UB Sept 2018 5250 - BridgePark W 34.77 11/15/2018 101-45201-438200 UB Sept 2018 5569 - Meadow Oak Ave sprinkler 299.86 11/15/2018 101-45201-438200 UB Sept 2018 5637- Meadow Oak Dog Park 5.45 11/15/2018 101-45201-438200 UB Sept 2018 7224 - WWTP 2,174.68 11/15/2018 602-49480-438200 UB Sept 2018 7256-003 - 349 Broadway W 14.38 11/15/2018 213-46301-438200 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/19/2018 - 4:23 PM) Page I Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference UB Sept 2018 7256-007 - 103 Pine St. 14.38 11/15/2018 213-46301-438200 UB Sept 2018 7441 - 200 W. Broadway sprinkler 15.19 11/15/2018 101-43120-438200 UB Sept 2018 7885 - Help Center 57.04 11/15/2018 217-41990-438200 UB Sept 2018 8086 - 4th St. Warming House 14.38 11/15/2018 101-45201-438200 UB Sept 2018 8114 - Hi -Way Liquor 210.14 11/15/2018 609-49754-438200 UB Sept 2018 8117 - MCC 824.35 11/15/2018 226-45126-438200 UB Sept 2018 8119 - Fire Station 51.46 11/15/2018 101-42200-438200 UB Sept 2018 8120 - Bldg. Inspections Garage 14.38 11/15/2018 101-41940-438200 UB Sept 2018 8177 - Library 115.19 11/15/2018 101-45501-438200 UB Sept 2018 8394 - Riverside Cemetery 5.45 11/15/2018 651-49010-438200 UB Sept 2018 8488 - Hillcrest Park 117.33 11/15/2018 101-45201-438200 UB Sept 2018 8528 - Monti NSP Softball Field 339.18 11/15/2018 101-45203-438200 UB Sept 2018 8533 - Chelsea Rd. LIR sprinkler 31.99 11/15/2018 602-49490-438200 UB Sept 2018 8621 - Fenning Round -a -bout 17.74 11/15/2018 101-43120-438200 UB Sept 2018 8622 - Pioneer Park bathrooms 14.38 11/15/2018 101-45201-438200 UB Sept 2018 8631 - Animal Shelter 14.38 11/15/2018 101-42700-438200 UB Sept 2018 8674 - 207 Chelsea Reservoir sprinkler 100.14 11/15/2018 601-49440-438200 UB Sept 2018 8903 - PW Shop/Clerical 132.79 11/15/2018 101-43127-438200 UB Sept 2018 8904 - PW Vehicle Storage 8.83 11/15/2018 101-43127-438200 UB Sept 2018 8905 - PW Office 14.38 11/15/2018 101-43127-438200 UB Sept 2018 8906 - PW sprinklers 27.66 11/15/2018 101-43127-438200 UB Sept 2018 10063 - Front St. Park sprinklers 40.83 11/15/2018 101-45201-438200 UB Sept 2018 10128 - 118 6th St. Office 30.82 11/15/2018 101-41941-438200 UB Sept 2018 10267 - Community Gardens 5.45 11/15/2018 226-45127-438200 UB Sept 2018 13953 - Hwy 25/Broadway sprinklers 10.25 11/15/2018 101-43120-438200 UB Sept 2018 14522 - Hillside Cemetery sprinklers 6.50 11/15/2018 101-45201-438200 UB Sept 2018 14915 - 4100 1/2 Cedar St sprinklers 7.15 11/15/2018 101-43120-438200 UB Sept 2018 15064 - Featherstone Park sprinkler 77.16 11/15/2018 101-45201-438200 UB Sept 2018 14476 - Ellison House 17.67 11/15/2018 101-45201-438200 Check Total: 5,407.49 Vendor: 2811 US BANK CORPORATE PMT SYSTEM Check Sequence: 6 ACH Enabled: True 11/06/2018 Ausco- (3 1) embroidery on zips - split Streets 61.00 11/15/2018 101-43120-441700 11/06/2018 Ausco- (3 1) embroidery on zips - split Parks 17.50 11/15/2018 101-45201-441700 11/06/2018 Ausco- (3 1) embroidery on zips - split Water 17.50 11/15/2018 601-49440-441700 11/06/2018 Ausco- (3 1) embroidery on zips - split Sewer 17.50 11/15/2018 602-49490-441700 11/06/2018 Ameripride - uniforms Sept. 2018 - Parks 104.25 11/15/2018 101-45201-441700 11/06/2018 Ameripride - uniforms Sept. 2018 - Sewer 104.26 11/15/2018 602-49490-441700 11/06/2018 Ameripride - uniforms Sept. 2018 - Water 104.26 11/15/2018 601-49440-441700 11/06/2018 Ameripride - uniforms Sept. 2018 - Streets 104.26 11/15/2018 101-43120-441700 11/06/2018 Ameripride - shop towels Sept. 2018 104.25 11/15/2018 101-43127-421990 11/06/2018 Zee Medical - first aid supplies - Streets 196.05 11/15/2018 101-43127-420650 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/19/2018 - 4:23 PM) Page 2 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 11/06/2018 Zee Medical - first aid supplies - Parks 86.40 11/15/2018 101-45201-420650 11/06/2018 Zee Medical - first aid supplies - Water 32.95 11/15/2018 601-49440-420650 11/06/2018 WHCE - Sunset Ponds Lift Sta. 9/1-10/1/18 (96( 132.16 11/15/2018 602-49490-438100 11/06/2018 WHCE - 1645 & 1675 CR 39 40.14 11/15/2018 602-49490-438100 11/06/2018 WHCE - DMV 19.95 11/15/2018 217-41990-431900 11/06/2018 WHCE - 2171 W River St- Parks 36.45 11/15/2018 101-45201-431900 11/06/2018 WHCE - 5980 Jason Ave NE -Water 19.95 11/15/2018 601-49440-431900 11/06/2018 WHCE - MCC 27.95 11/15/2018 226-45126-431900 11/06/2018 WHCE - 207 Chelsea Rd - Water 32.95 11/15/2018 601-49440-431900 11/06/2018 WHCE - 209 Cedar St - Water 29.95 11/15/2018 601-49440-431900 11/06/2018 WHCE - 132 E Broadway - Water 29.95 11/15/2018 601-49440-431900 11/06/2018 WHCE - 107 River St. W - Parks 19.95 11/15/2018 101-45201-431900 11/06/2018 WHCE - Hi -Way Liquor - Nov. 2018 21.42 11/15/2018 609-49754-431900 11/06/2018 WHCE - MCC - Nov. 2018 19.95 11/15/2018 226-45126-431900 11/06/2018 WHCE - 200 Dundas Rd- Nov. 2018 29.95 11/15/2018 601-49440-431900 11/06/2018 WHCE - 909 Golf Course Rd- Nov. 2018 19.95 11/15/2018 101-43110-431900 11/06/2018 WHCE - General Street Lighting 1,328.49 11/15/2018 101-43160-438100 11/06/2018 Monti Napa - #112 & #302 return (2) Core Depo -26.07 11/15/2018 101-43127-422110 11/06/2018 Office Max - shipping box for parts return 1.99 11/15/2018 101-42200-422110 11/06/2018 Home Depot - hex brushing; insert xmpt elbow 5.20 11/15/2018 101-43120-422500 11/06/2018 Runnings - hex key set 5 pc for hose repair 10.29 11/15/2018 101-42200-422100 11/06/2018 Monti Napa - #217 - (2) U -bolt 13.24 11/15/2018 101-45201-422100 11/06/2018 PayPal - #202 - seal oil 15.15 11/15/2018 101-45201-422100 11/06/2018 Runnings - anit-sieze lub; mech. glove 20.28 11/15/2018 101-43125-421990 11/06/2018 Monti Napa 4225 - solenoid 25.81 11/15/2018 101-45201-422100 11/06/2018 Monti Napa -(2) gal. RTU Ant; (2) metal prop.; r 26.69 11/15/2018 101-45201-421650 11/06/2018 Runnings - (3) 8 qt. vermiculite; (3) 8qt. perlite 29.94 11/15/2018 101-45201-421650 11/06/2018 Runnings - laund. det.; degreaser; bowl clean; lic 32.75 11/15/2018 101-42200-421100 11/06/2018 Runnings - Ext. Cord 50' 34.91 11/15/2018 101-42200-421990 11/06/2018 Fastenal - (300) cable tie 38.82 11/15/2018 101-45201-421650 11/06/2018 Auto Value - blk. shield retainers; tern piggy bk 42.43 11/15/2018 101-45201-421650 11/06/2018 Cub - resale - (39) limes; (10) lemons 43.71 11/15/2018 609-49750-425500 11/06/2018 Mills Fleet Farm - (22) driveway markers 43.78 11/15/2018 101-45201-421650 11/06/2018 Fastenal - ((3) foam earplugs 53.51 11/15/2018 101-45201-421650 11/06/2018 Marties - 25# sunny- Gillard Ave Blvd repair 60.00 11/15/2018 101-43120-422500 11/06/2018 Runnings - (12) engine oil; WD40; (4) battery pl 62.03 11/15/2018 101-45201-421650 11/06/2018 Cutter Sales - (4) 2 bolt flange 66.12 11/15/2018 101-43120-422110 11/06/2018 Fastenal - (500) cable ties for straw bales E. Brid 66.17 11/15/2018 101-45201-421650 11/06/2018 DISH - Nov. 2018 service 71.64 11/15/2018 609-49754-432500 11/06/2018 Monti Napa - (10) asst. oil filers; air filter 71.68 11/15/2018 101-43127-421990 11/06/2018 Marties -(10) straw bales sliding hill 75.00 11/15/2018 101-45201-421650 11/06/2018 Runnings - (2) 10,000 lb. straps; (2) 15' stap; 4pl 95.71 11/15/2018 101-45201-421650 11/06/2018 Cintas - inv. #4011053770; 4011327589 117.36 11/15/2018 609-49754-431990 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/19/2018 - 4:23 PM) Page 3 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 11/06/2018 Marties - (30) straw bales - Eastbridge Sliding H 225.00 11/15/2018 101-45201-421650 11/06/2018 Arctic Glacier - resale mv. #1957829207; 19578 240.71 11/15/2018 609-49750-425500 11/06/2018 Auto Value -(2) disc brake caliper; (2) wheel sea 617.14 11/15/2018 101-43120-422110 11/06/2018 Titan Mach- #104; 103; 163- (2) rod assmb.; (2) 833.23 11/15/2018 101-43120-422100 11/06/2018 Royal Tire - check all truck tires; repair Tender 7 898.60 11/15/2018 101-42200-440500 11/06/2018 Aspen Mills - uniforms for Fire Marshall DK 908.25 11/15/2018 101-42200-421120 11/06/2018 Epasales - sewer main hydraulic root cutter 1,629.06 11/15/2018 602-49490-424100 11/06/2018 Runnings - (3) rope clip 1.17 11/15/2018 101-43120-421990 11/06/2018 Home Depot - 30 gal lawn bags 1.97 11/15/2018 101-43127-421990 11/06/2018 Fastenal - #204 - HCS 3/4 -160 1/2 YZ8 2.31 11/15/2018 101-45201-422110 11/06/2018 USPS - flouride samples mail 3.75 11/15/2018 601-49440-432200 11/06/2018 Monti Napa - #301 oil filter 4.15 11/15/2018 601-49440-422110 11/06/2018 Runnings - 60" handle 4.99 11/15/2018 101-45201-421650 11/06/2018 Runnings -2 pk 43w halogen bulb 4.99 11/15/2018 101-42200-421990 11/06/2018 Monti Napa - 75 oz prem. starter fluid 6.64 11/15/2018 101-43127-421990 11/06/2018 Runnings - 16 oz.Seafoam Motor Tuneup 6.98 11/15/2018 101-45201-421600 11/06/2018 Runnings - 25' ext. cord 7.99 11/15/2018 101-42200-421990 11/06/2018 Parking Ramp St. Paul- Chiefs Conference parks 11.00 11/15/2018 101-42200-433100 11/06/2018 Runnings - (6) 50 gal. blend RV antifreeze 11.88 11/15/2018 101-45201-421650 11/06/2018 Cub - Water for Wine Tasting 11.96 11/15/2018 609-49754-425550 11/06/2018 Runnings - (3) air filters 13.77 11/15/2018 101-45201-421650 11/06/2018 Monti Napa -U-6 Gas Cap 13.85 11/15/2018 101-42200-422110 11/06/2018 Runnings - (6) keyblank; 5pk leaf bag 13.93 11/15/2018 101-43127-421990 11/06/2018 Marties -(2) straw bales- Eastbridge Roses 15.00 11/15/2018 101-45201-421650 11/06/2018 Runnings - 25' cable; eye bolt; (2) rope clip- Trei 15.77 11/15/2018 101-43120-421990 11/06/2018 Auto Value - RV blade 15.99 11/15/2018 101-45201-421650 11/06/2018 Fastenal - (30) 5/-11 TOP Lk GR - shop supplies 17.03 11/15/2018 101-43127-421990 11/06/2018 Dollar Tree - (6) ea. spiral art; paper; paint set 18.00 11/15/2018 101-45201-421990 11/06/2018 Monti Napa - (5) oil filter 20.75 11/15/2018 101-43127-421990 11/06/2018 Auto Value - (6) RV antifreeze Froslie Bldg. 20.94 11/15/2018 213-46301-461500 11/06/2018 Batteries & Bulbs - 12V lead battery for security 21.27 11/15/2018 601-49440-421990 11/06/2018 Runnings - (2) gas cans; shaker siphon 23.97 11/15/2018 101-43127-421990 11/06/2018 Cub - resale - (30) limes; (6) lemons 26.64 11/15/2018 609-49750-425500 11/06/2018 Amazon - (42) pk coffee 27.62 11/15/2018 101-43110-421990 11/06/2018 Monti Napa - #222 -(2) Pro soft touch switch; (1 27.98 11/15/2018 101-45201-422110 11/06/2018 Cub - resale - (30) limes; (10) lemons 30.60 11/15/2018 609-49750-425500 11/06/2018 Cub - vinegar 3.96 11/15/2018 609-49754-421990 11/06/2018 Walmart - Arts Innitiative - candy 39.08 11/15/2018 101-45204-421990 11/06/2018 DSG - (20) copper disc 44.80 11/15/2018 601-49440-421990 11/06/2018 FS Solutions - DOT urine drug screen- S. 52.20 11/15/2018 601-49440-431990 11/06/2018 Monti Napa - (24) pump oil 57.36 11/15/2018 602-49490-422100 11/06/2018 ElsenpeterAuction- snowplowparts 57.44 11/15/2018 101-43125-422100 11/06/2018 Walmart - Halloween Candy 61.25 11/15/2018 609-49754-421990 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/19/2018 - 4:23 PM) Page 4 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 11/06/2018 Aspen Mills - set up fee for Logo Embroid. - Fin 65.00 11/15/2018 101-42200-421120 11/06/2018 Monti Napa- (24) oil; (2) filter 65.66 11/15/2018 101-45201-421650 11/06/2018 Amazon - white board; duffel bag; eraser; dry er; 98.90 11/15/2018 101-42200-421990 11/06/2018 Amazon - 2pk air filter; 40pk. AA batteries; key( 72.23 11/15/2018 101-43110-421990 11/06/2018 Runnings - Hillman bulk bin 83.99 11/15/2018 101-43160-421530 11/06/2018 Red's - #401 fuel - shop fuel pumps down -1/2 47.20 11/15/2018 601-49440-421990 11/06/2018 Red's - #401 fuel - shop fuel pumps down- 1/2 47.20 11/15/2018 602-49490-421990 11/06/2018 Royal Tire -Vanguard Str II tire - Parks 111.75 11/15/2018 101-45201-422200 11/06/2018 Monti Napa - U-1 -battery 116.96 11/15/2018 101-42200-422110 11/06/2018 Mills Fleet Farm- waders for cleaning Lift Statio 119.99 11/15/2018 602-49490-421990 11/06/2018 Cintas - inv. 4010481103; 4010757483 121.39 11/15/2018 609-49754-431990 11/06/2018 KITailors - (21) itmes dry cleaning - Hi -Way Li( 157.66 11/15/2018 609-49754-431990 11/06/2018 Sherwin Williams - (15) 5 gal white 171.72 11/15/2018 101-45203-421990 11/06/2018 Safety-Kleen- (8)g. waste combustable liquid 192.91 11/15/2018 101-43127-431990 11/06/2018 Hi -Way Liquors - Gift Cards - Wine Tasting priz 200.00 11/15/2018 609-49754-425550 11/06/2018 Arctic Glacier - resale inv. #1955827408; 19558: 227.55 11/15/2018 609-49750-425500 11/06/2018 Monti Napa - #204 - radiator 234.19 11/15/2018 101-45201-422110 11/06/2018 Fastenal - (30) work gloves; (10) safety glasses 280.02 11/15/2018 101-43120-420650 11/06/2018 My Asset Tags - (200) Poly. w/ hightack adhesiv 262.20 11/15/2018 101-43120-421990 11/06/2018 Dyna - doz. penetrant; (3) dryobits; (200) nuts; b 333.40 11/15/2018 101-43127-421990 11/06/2018 Elk River Ford - #204 - damper; crankshaft; tens 382.28 11/15/2018 101-45201-422110 11/06/2018 Emerg. Auto Tech. - (2) amber dome beacon ligl 466.29 11/15/2018 101-43120-420650 11/06/2018 Elk River Ford -Bad fuel repair - #209 - drain; re 471.37 11/15/2018 101-45201-422110 11/06/2018 Runnings - backpack blower 499.95 11/15/2018 101-46102-421990 11/06/2018 PayPal -Mule #202- clutch 500.00 11/15/2018 101-45201-422110 11/06/2018 Monti Napa - #112 - brake pads; (2) calipe;(2) c( 548.46 11/15/2018 101-43120-422110 11/06/2018 PTAC Dir. Sales - Heating Unit - PW office- 1/2 349.50 11/15/2018 601-49440-421990 11/06/2018 PTAC Dir. Sales - Heating Unit - PW office- 1/2 349.50 11/15/2018 602-49490-421990 11/06/2018 M & R Sign - (18) asst. signs 800.40 11/15/2018 101-43120-422600 11/06/2018 Central Hyd. - #105 - shaft; piston seal; o -rings; 979.20 11/15/2018 101-43120-422110 11/06/2018 Amazon - 6pk. Antimicrobial Filtration Bags 25.98 11/15/2018 101-43110-421990 11/06/2018 Nighthawk - Dec. 2018 security monitor/cellular 49.95 11/15/2018 101-42200-431900 11/06/2018 Wine Spectator - annual renewal - Hi -Way Liqu( 59.95 11/15/2018 609-49754-443300 11/06/2018 Facebook - Advertising Wine Tasting Event 74.31 11/15/2018 609-49754-434990 11/06/2018 Sherwin Williams - Chamber sign- paint & repai 93.88 11/15/2018 101-41940-421990 11/06/2018 AST Sports - (14) Track Jacket- Hi -Way Liquor 494.00 11/15/2018 609-49754-421110 11/06/2018 AST Sports - utx (14) embrodery-Track Jacket -1 119.00 11/15/2018 609-49754-421110 11/06/2018 Monti Chamber - August Lunch (RL) 15.00 11/15/2018 101-41940-443990 11/06/2018 Monti Chamber - August Lunch (PH & CM) 30.00 11/15/2018 226-45122-443990 11/06/2018 Monti Chamber - August Lunch (JT) 15.00 11/15/2018 213-46301-443990 11/06/2018 Trusted Employees - Oct Background Checks (2 46.00 11/15/2018 609-49754-431990 11/06/2018 Trusted Employees - Oct Background Checks (3 69.00 11/15/2018 101-41310-431990 11/06/2018 Trusted Employees - Oct Background Checks (2 46.00 11/15/2018 217-41990-431990 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/19/2018 - 4:23 PM) Page 5 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 11/06/2018 Trusted Employees - Oct Background Checks (1 23.00 11/15/2018 226-45122-431990 11/06/2018 Verizon - Aug 21 - Sept 20 35.01 11/15/2018 101-43115-432100 11/06/2018 Verizon - Aug 21 - Sept 20 26.02 11/15/2018 101-43120-432100 11/06/2018 Verizon - Aug 21 - Sept 20 140.04 11/15/2018 101-42200-432100 11/06/2018 Amazon - Coffee, Candy 208.84 11/15/2018 101-41310-421990 11/06/2018 Amazon - Table, Easel Stands (2) 86.61 11/15/2018 101-41410-421990 11/06/2018 ThyssenKrupp - Maintenance Agreement @ MC 416.68 11/15/2018 226-45126-431990 11/06/2018 ThyssenKrupp - Maint Agreement @ Prairie Ctr 198.95 11/15/2018 101-41941-440100 11/06/2018 MN Dept Labor - Qtr 3 2018 Bldg Permit Surclu -216.09 11/15/2018 101-42400-343000 11/06/2018 MN Dept Labor - Qtr 3 2018 Bldg Permit Surch� 5,402.30 11/15/2018 101-00000-208110 11/06/2018 Advanced Disposal - Sept 2018 38,519.73 11/15/2018 101-43230-438400 11/06/2018 Advanced Disposal - Sept 2018 - Recycling 13,216.00 11/15/2018 101-43230-438400 11/06/2018 Advanced Disposal - Sept 2018 35.80 11/15/2018 101-43127-438400 11/06/2018 Advanced Disposal - Sept 2018 47.74 11/15/2018 101-45201-438400 11/06/2018 Advanced Disposal - Sept 2018 23.87 11/15/2018 101-45201-438400 11/06/2018 Advanced Disposal - Sept 2018 113.38 11/15/2018 602-49480-438400 11/06/2018 Advanced Disposal - Sept 2018 208.87 11/15/2018 226-45126-438400 11/06/2018 Advanced Disposal - Sept 2018 23.87 11/15/2018 609-49754-438400 11/06/2018 Advanced Disposal - Sept 2018 23.87 11/15/2018 101-45201-438400 11/06/2018 Advanced Disposal - Sept 2018 11.93 11/15/2018 101-45501-431990 11/06/2018 Advanced Disposal - Sept 2018 - GFEE 1,269.62 11/15/2018 101-43230-438400 11/06/2018 Monti Napa - Hardware for Net in Romp N Ston 3.00 11/15/2018 226-45126-422990 11/06/2018 NBP -White Out Tape 9.27 11/15/2018 101-41310-421990 11/06/2018 McDonalds - Meal @ MN Recreation & Park As 10.14 11/15/2018 226-45122-433100 11/06/2018 Home Depot - Filter for Garage Furnance 6.72 11/15/2018 101-42400-421990 11/06/2018 Home Depot - Filter for Food Shelf Furnance 6.72 11/15/2018 217-41990-421990 11/06/2018 Cintas - Inv# 4009928576 19.60 11/15/2018 101-45501-431990 11/06/2018 Randy's - Monthly Shredding Service 20.22 11/15/2018 101-41310-431990 11/06/2018 Randy's - Monthly Shredding Service 20.22 11/15/2018 217-41990-431990 11/06/2018 Verizon - Sept 4 - Oct 3 20.73 11/15/2018 601-49440-432100 11/06/2018 Verizon - Sept 4 - Oct 3 20.73 11/15/2018 602-49490-432100 11/06/2018 Holiday - Unleaded Fuel 8.28 Gallons @ $2.829 23.42 11/15/2018 217-41990-421200 11/06/2018 Holiday - Unleaded Fuel 8.877 Gallons @ $2.65 23.60 11/15/2018 217-41990-421200 11/06/2018 Holiday - Unleaded Fuel 8.937 Gallons @ $2.69 24.12 11/15/2018 217-41990-421200 11/06/2018 Holiday - Unleaded Fuel 8.813 Gallons @ $2.73 24.14 11/15/2018 217-41990-421200 11/06/2018 Amazon - Paper Plates (165 ct) 26.40 11/15/2018 101-42200-421990 11/06/2018 Amazon - Coffee 28.31 11/15/2018 101-41310-421990 11/06/2018 Holiday - Unleaded Fuel 10.189 Gallons @ $2.7 28.52 11/15/2018 217-41990-421200 11/06/2018 Quiznos - Safety Prize 30.00 11/15/2018 101-41800-443990 11/06/2018 Xcel Energy Parking - Stakeholder Meeting (JO) 31.00 11/15/2018 101-41310-433100 11/06/2018 E Lifeguard - Lanyards & Whistles for Pool Staf 32.22 11/15/2018 226-45124-421990 11/06/2018 NBP - Copy Paper 33.50 11/15/2018 226-45122-421990 11/06/2018 Home Depot - White Paint for Doors (1 gal); Do 35.95 11/15/2018 226-45126-422990 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/19/2018 - 4:23 PM) Page 6 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 11/06/2018 NBP - Paper 35.97 11/15/2018 226-45122-421990 11/06/2018 Wall Street Journal - Monthly Subscription (WO 38.99 11/15/2018 101-41520-443300 11/06/2018 Dacotah Paper - Bathroom Supplies 40.13 11/15/2018 101-45501-421990 11/06/2018 P Touch Direct - Label Tape (2) 40.43 11/15/2018 226-45122-421990 11/06/2018 Domino's Pizza - Meal for Planning Commissior 42.56 11/15/2018 101-41910-443990 11/06/2018 Cintas - Inv# 4010203903, 4009928590, 401048 132.03 11/15/2018 226-45126-431990 11/06/2018 Sportsmith - Pedals for Bikes (2) 45.28 11/15/2018 226-45126-422990 11/06/2018 J P Cooke - Notary Stamp 45.95 11/15/2018 217-41990-421990 11/06/2018 Target - Bananas, Protein Bars 30.96 11/15/2018 226-45125-425410 11/06/2018 Target - Pens, Highlighters 15.77 11/15/2018 226-45122-421990 11/06/2018 Target - JBL Speaker 49.99 11/15/2018 101-41310-421990 11/06/2018 Runnings - (3) 50 gal. RV antifreeze 7.47 11/15/2018 101-45201-421650 11/06/2018 Auto Value - permatex the right; anaerobic; mot( 41.97 11/15/2018 101-45201-421650 11/06/2018 Klingspor Abrasives - (100) bonded abrasives; (] 284.51 11/15/2018 101-45201-421650 11/06/2018 Monti Napa - #110 - hdr. hose; (9) weather shier 57.50 11/15/2018 101-43120-422110 11/06/2018 Amazon - Keyboard, Mouse, Post It Notes, 50.77 11/15/2018 217-41990-421990 11/06/2018 Sportsmith - Cup Inserts for Elliptical (4) 50.97 11/15/2018 226-45126-422990 11/06/2018 Amazon - Bathroom Supplies 55.25 11/15/2018 101-42200-421990 11/06/2018 Amazon - File Folders 55.68 11/15/2018 226-45122-421990 11/06/2018 Red's - Fuel for Work Truck #613 58.00 11/15/2018 101-43115-421200 11/06/2018 Sportsmith - Wheel Kit for Spin Bikes (2) 60.15 11/15/2018 226-45127-421720 11/06/2018 Home Depot - Lights, Firm Grip Winter Safety ( 60.76 11/15/2018 226-45126-422990 11/06/2018 Target - Snacks for Elections 66.16 11/15/2018 101-41410-421990 11/06/2018 Verizon - Sept 11 - Oct 10 62.46 11/15/2018 101-43115-432100 11/06/2018 Dacotah Paper - Bathroom Supplies 70.03 11/15/2018 101-45501-421990 11/06/2018 Home Depot - 175W Lights for Mississippi Rooi 80.97 11/15/2018 226-45126-422990 11/06/2018 Dacotah Paper - Concession Supplies: Plates, GI 83.20 11/15/2018 226-45125-421990 11/06/2018 Ausco- Staff Shirts - Polos w/Embroidery (6) 90.00 11/15/2018 226-45122-421110 11/06/2018 NBP - Paper, Staple Remover, Pens, Staples, Tal 93.74 11/15/2018 217-41990-421990 11/06/2018 Amazon - File Folders, Batteries 94.58 11/15/2018 226-45122-421990 11/06/2018 MN Rec Park Assoc - Annual Membership (CM; 99.00 11/15/2018 226-45122-443300 11/06/2018 MN Rec Park Assoc - Annual Membership (AM 99.00 11/15/2018 226-45122-443300 11/06/2018 MN Rec Park Assoc - Annual Membership (TH) 99.00 11/15/2018 226-45122-443300 11/06/2018 Mpls/St Paul Business Journal - Subscription (JC 100.00 11/15/2018 101-41310-443300 11/06/2018 Dacotah Paper - Concession Supplies: Cups, Lid 101.38 11/15/2018 226-45125-421990 11/06/2018 Minncor Industries - Motor Vehicle Titles (3 pkg 105.00 11/15/2018 217-41990-421990 11/06/2018 Sams Club - Birthday Party Plates 111.03 11/15/2018 226-45123-421460 11/06/2018 Amazon - Black Toner Cartridges (2 pk) for Elec 122.99 11/15/2018 101-41410-421990 11/06/2018 MN Rec Park Assoc - Workshop (SC) 149.00 11/15/2018 226-45122-433100 11/06/2018 Fred Pryor Seminars - "Essentials of HR Law" S 149.00 11/15/2018 101-41800-433100 11/06/2018 Gov't Social Media Org - City Annual Membersl 185.00 11/15/2018 101-41310-443300 11/06/2018 Kahler Grand Hotel - MN Rec & Park Assoc Coj 218.48 11/15/2018 226-45122-433100 11/06/2018 NBP - Tape, Labels, Pens, Folders, 263.50 11/15/2018 101-41310-421990 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/19/2018 - 4:23 PM) Page 7 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number 11/06/2018 Horizon CPO Seminars - CPO Training (JA) 11/ 276.50 11/15/2018 226-45122-433100 11/06/2018 Amazon - Office Chair, Calculator, Bankers Box 294.37 11/15/2018 217-41990-421990 11/06/2018 NBP -2019 Calendars for Staff (19) 300.02 11/15/2018 101-41310-421990 11/06/2018 NBP - Name Badge Labels, Shipping Labels, Pa] 285.80 11/15/2018 101-42200-421990 11/06/2018 NBP - White Out Tape, Disinfecting Wipes 16.29 11/15/2018 101-41310-421990 11/06/2018 Survey Monkey - Annual Renewal (TE) 336.00 11/15/2018 101-41800-443300 11/06/2018 Johnson Fit Well - Weight Plates for Bars (10) 356.70 11/15/2018 226-45127-421720 11/06/2018 NBP - Highlighters, Paper, Portfolio's, 365.25 11/15/2018 101-41310-421990 11/06/2018 Marties - Softner Salt (63 bags) 371.70 11/15/2018 226-45126-422990 11/06/2018 J P Cooke - Heavy Duty Dater Stamps (4), Rec'd 402.66 11/15/2018 217-41990-421990 11/06/2018 Asessment Leaders - Checkpoint 360 460.00 11/15/2018 101-41800-431990 11/06/2018 U of M Cont Ed - 2019 Bldg Official Classes (R 780.00 11/15/2018 101-42400-433100 11/06/2018 Commerical Recreation Specialists - Freight for 77.69 11/15/2018 226-45122-433300 11/06/2018 Commerical Recreation Specialists - Net for Tun 741.33 11/15/2018 226-45127-421730 11/06/2018 Dacotah Paper - Bathroorn/Locker Room Supplii 1,057.26 11/15/2018 226-45126-421990 11/06/2018 Dacotah Paper - Bathroorn/Locker Room Supplii 1,305.34 11/15/2018 226-45126-421990 11/06/2018 Monti Printing - Postage for Fall/Winter Newslel 1,767.71 11/15/2018 101-41310-432200 11/06/2018 Target - Power Stip for Elections 9.65 11/15/2018 101-41410-421990 11/06/2018 Commercial Recreation - Refund for Cancelled ( -409.51 11/15/2018 226-45127-421730 11/06/2018 Domino's Pizza - Meal for EDA Meeting 32.99 11/15/2018 213-46301-443990 11/06/2018 General Rental - Stanchions for Elections 552.00 11/15/2018 101-41410-421990 11/06/2018 Fastenal - (100) cable tie 26.34 11/15/2018 101-43120-421990 11/06/2018 Fastenal - (150) 1/2-13 x 2 HCS S/S 140.61 11/15/2018 101-43120-421990 11/06/2018 St.Cloud Parking - Parking 2 Days @ MN Revel 9.60 11/15/2018 213-46301-433100 Check Total: 93,018.87 Vendor: 2438 VANCO SERVICES LLC Check Sequence: 7 00009235540 Vanco - Gateway Exchange - Oct 2018 2.29 11/15/2018 656-00000-202099 00009235540 Vanco - Gateway Exchange - Oct 2018 57.75 11/15/2018 601-49440-443980 00009235540 Vanco - Gateway Exchange - Oct 2018 57.74 11/15/2018 602-49490-443980 Check Total: Total for Check Run: Total of Number of Checks: 117.78 Reference ACH Enabled: True 101,602.51 The preceding list of bills payable was reviewed and approved for payment. 7 Date: 11/26/18 Approved by Mayor Brian Stumpf AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/19/2018 - 4:23 PM) Page 8 Accounts Payable Computer Check Proof List by Vendor User: Julie.Cheney Printed: 11/21/2018 - 12:13PM Batch: 00204.11.2018 - 204.11.2018 AP Invoice No Description Vendor: 1006 ABM EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLY LLC 0157965 #112 - repair blown hoses & rep. rot. joint; Enabled: Check Total: Vendor: 1020 ALMCO HYDRAULICS INC 17278 Preventative mtc. inspection/ baler Check Total: Vendor: 1023 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION 186028-18107 2019 Membership - APA & AICP Category F M Check Total: Vendor: 1025 AMERICAN TEST CENTER INC 2182466 Bucket Truck - annual safety inspection Enabled: Check Total: Vendor: 2337 CINDYANDERSON 11/20/2018 Election Judge 2018 (12.75 hrs) 11/20/2018 Election Judge 2018 Mileage (26 miles) 539.00 Check Total: Vendor: 2338 FREDRICK ANDERSON 11/20/2018 Election Judge Mileage (26 miles) 11/20/2018 Election Judge 2018 (18 hrs) Check Sequence: 4 Check Total: Vendor: 3991 ANOKA RAMSEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE 00440887 CPR & AED Training (11/6/18) Amount Payment Date Acct Number Check Sequence: 1 3,615.73 11/27/2018 101-43120-422110 3,615.73 Moiiii6effo Y Reference ACH Enabled: True AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/21/2018 - 12:13 PM) Page 1 Check Sequence: 2 ACH Enabled: False 139.00 11/27/2018 609-49754-431990 139.00 Check Sequence: 3 ACH Enabled: False 539.00 11/27/2018 101-41910-443300 539.00 Check Sequence: 4 ACH Enabled: False 450.00 11/27/2018 101-43120-431990 450.00 Check Sequence: 5 ACH Enabled: False 149.00 11/27/2018 101-41410-431990 14.17 11/27/2018 101-41410-433100 163.17 Check Sequence: 6 ACH Enabled: False 14.17 11/27/2018 101-41410-433100 216.00 11/27/2018 101-41410-431990 230.17 Check Sequence: 7 ACH Enabled: False 650.00 11/27/2018 101-41800-431960 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/21/2018 - 12:13 PM) Page 1 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Check Total: 650.00 Vendor: 1039 AQUA LOGIC INC Check Sequence: 8 ACH Enabled: True 48227 120W Lamps (2) 641.24 11/27/2018 226-45124-421990 Check Total: 641.24 Vendor: 5134 MARGARET ARNDT Check Sequence: 9 ACH Enabled: True 11/20/2018 Election Judge 2018 (20 hrs) 200.00 11/27/2018 101-41410-431990 11/20/2018 Election Judge Mileage (52 miles) 28.34 11/27/2018 101-41410-433100 Check Total: 228.34 Vendor: 3491 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY Check Sequence: 10 ACH Enabled: False 3304748 resale - beer 205.00 11/27/2018 609-49750-425200 3305177 resale - beer 237.00 11/27/2018 609-49750-425200 Check Total: 442.00 Vendor: 4502 ARVIG Check Sequence: 11 ACH Enabled: True 11/8/2018 IT Services - Oct 2018 73.00 11/27/2018 702-00000-431990 284604 Fallon Ave. Project 18,013.10 11/27/2018 656-49877-440100 284604 Oct. 2018 - Buried Drops 9,375.00 11/27/2018 656-49877-440100 284604 Oct. 2018 - FNM expenses 5,020.59 11/27/2018 656-49877-421800 Check Total: 32,481.69 Vendor: 1065 BELLBOY CORPORATION Check Sequence: 12 ACH Enabled: True 66867100 resale -liquor 613.00 11/27/2018 609-49750-425100 66867100 resale- wine 352.00 11/27/2018 609-49750-425300 66867100 resale - item # 8276501 not on truck -58.00 11/27/2018 609-49750-425100 66867100 freight 18.00 11/27/2018 609-49750-433300 66915300 resale - liquor 2,133.00 11/27/2018 609-49750-425100 66915300 freight 19.80 11/27/2018 609-49750-433300 66994800 freight 30.60 11/27/2018 609-49750-433300 66994800 resale - liquor 1,229.50 11/27/2018 609-49750-425100 66994800 resale - wine 480.00 11/27/2018 609-49750-425300 66999100 resale -liquor 636.00 11/27/2018 609-49750-425100 66999100 freight 5.40 11/27/2018 609-49750-433300 Check Total: 5,459.30 Vendor: 1067 BERNICK'S Check Sequence: 13 ACH Enabled: False AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/21/2018 - 12:13 PM) Page 2 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 341486 resale - coffee 440.37 11/27/2018 226-45125-425410 59052 resale - pop, water, 194.30 11/27/2018 226-45125-425410 59053 resale -soda pop 88.06 11/27/2018 609-49750-425400 59053 resale juice 16.40 11/27/2018 609-49750-425500 59054 resale - beer 1,059.50 11/27/2018 609-49750-425200 62696 resale - pop, water, Gatorade, Juice 474.05 11/27/2018 226-45125-425410 62697 resale - soda pop 193.12 11/27/2018 609-49750-425400 62697 resale -juice 49.20 11/27/2018 609-49750-425500 62698 resale - beer 1,338.45 11/27/2018 609-49750-425200 66245 resale - pop, water, juice, Gatorade 332.25 11/27/2018 226-45125-425410 Check Total: 4,185.70 Vendor: 2340 GLADYS BITZER Check Sequence: 14 ACH Enabled: False 11/20/2018 Election Judge 2018 - (20 hrs) 200.00 11/27/2018 101-41410-431990 Check Total: 200.00 Vendor: 5135 ANNA BOHANON Check Sequence: 15 ACH Enabled: False 11/20/2018 Election Judge 2018 (17.5 hrs) 175.00 11/27/2018 101-41410-431990 Check Total: 175.00 Vendor: 4950 BONDHUS CORPORATION Check Sequence: 16 ACH Enabled: False 11/16/2018 GMEF Loan Draw #2: Saw and Misc Parts Rece 41,816.13 11/27/2018 213-46601-181200 Check Total: 41,816.13 Vendor: 1080 BRAEMAR MAILING SERVICE INC Check Sequence: 17 ACH Enabled: False 59362 UB Nov 2018 Invoices - (3,715) Print, Fold, Stu: 721.39 11/27/2018 601-49440-431800 59362 UB Nov 2018 Invoices - (3,715) Print, Fold, Stu: 721.39 11/27/2018 602-49490-431800 Check Total: 1,442.78 Vendor: 3632 BRIAN BRAMLEY Check Sequence: 18 ACH Enabled: True 11930 dba ERS - partial order clothing approved by C( 402.12 11/27/2018 101-42200-421120 11963 dba ERS - partial order clothing approved by C( 9,741.84 11/27/2018 101-42200-421120 11968 dba ERS - (36) gloves clothing approved by CC 2,997.99 11/27/2018 101-42200-421120 11991 dba ERS - partial order clothing approved by C( 783.34 11/27/2018 101-42200-421120 Check Total: 13,925.29 Vendor: 4328 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN WINE & SPIF Check Sequence: 19 ACH Enabled: False 1080881668 resale - liquor 135.36 11/27/2018 609-49750-425100 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/21/2018 - 12:13 PM) Page 3 Invoice No Description 1080881668 freight 1080885678 freight 1080885678 resale - wine 1080885678 resale - liquor 1080885678 resale - mix 1080889018 resale - mix 1080889018 resale - wine 1080889018 resale - liquor 1080889018 freight 1080889019 resale - beer 40.95 Check Total: Vendor: 2890 BROTHERS FIRE PROTECTION CO 27907 Annual Sprinkler Inspections 2018 - PW 609-49750-425400 Check Total: Vendor: 4797 C W METALS 11/18/2018 Refund Grading Escrow 2,026.18 Check Total: Vendor: 1091 CAMPBELL KNUTSON PA 2348-001 G 112 Code Enforcement - Oct 2018 2348-137G 5 201843 - Monti High School Proj - Oct 2018 2348-148G 15 16C006 - Fallon Ave Condemnation - Oct 2018 2348-149G 3 17D005 - Affordable Self Storage - Oct 2018 7,222.15 Check Total: Vendor: 4646 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES L.P. 2185376 resale - beer 2185376 resale - beer n/a 2188254 resale - beer 2188518 resale - beer 2189036 resale - beer 2189760 resale - beer 643-0464 resale- beer Check Total: Vendor: 1095 CARLOS CREEK WINERY INC 16335 resale - wine AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/21/2018 - 12:13 PM) Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 1.65 11/27/2018 609-49750-433300 53.49 11/27/2018 609-49750-433300 949.82 11/27/2018 609-49750-425300 2,471.77 11/27/2018 609-49750-425100 40.95 11/27/2018 609-49750-425400 42.00 11/27/2018 609-49750-425400 1,323.67 11/27/2018 609-49750-425300 2,026.18 11/27/2018 609-49750-425100 46.76 11/27/2018 609-49750-433300 130.50 11/27/2018 609-49750-425200 7,222.15 Check Sequence: 20 ACH Enabled: True 185.00 11/27/2018 101-43127-431990 185.00 Check Sequence: 21 ACH Enabled: False 5,700.00 11/27/2018 101-00000-220110 5,700.00 Check Sequence: 22 ACH Enabled: True 537.50 11/27/2018 101-42400-430400 104.00 11/27/2018 101-00000-220110 5,162.10 11/27/2018 400-43300-459018 108.00 11/27/2018 101-00000-220110 5,911.60 Check Sequence: 23 ACH Enabled: True 12,676.05 11/27/2018 609-49750-425200 26.00 11/27/2018 609-49750-425400 168.00 11/27/2018 609-49750-425200 20,989.55 11/27/2018 609-49750-425200 145.00 11/27/2018 609-49750-425200 140.50 11/27/2018 609-49750-425200 22.10 11/27/2018 609-49750-425200 34,167.20 Check Sequence: 24 ACH Enabled: False 768.00 11/27/2018 609-49750-425300 Page 4 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 768.00 Check Total: Vendor: 5136 DUANE CARLSON 11/20/2018 Election Judge 2018 (18 hrs) 11/20/2018 Election Judge 2018 Mileage (25 miles) Check Total: Vendor: 4089 CARLSON & LYTER DISTRIBUTING, INC 6170224 resale - beer 180.00 Check Total: Vendor: 5137 WINFRED CAUSBY 11/20/2018 Election Judge 2018 (21 hrs) 11/20/2018 Election Judge 2018 Mileage (2 miles) Check Total: Vendor: 5129 CENTRAL LANDSCAPING, INC. Permit Refund Refund Water Use Permit- Dep. $1500-$315.091 Permit Refund Refund Water Use Permit- Dep. $1500-$315.091 Permit Refund Refund Water Use Permit- Dep. $1500-$315.091 Check Total: Vendor: 4315 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 11/1/2018 Digital Receiver Check Sequence: 26 Check Total: Vendor: 3831 RAELYNN COOK 11/15/2018 Mileage Reimbursement - Chapter Meeting (56 , 11/27/2018 Check Total: Vendor: 2935 CUSTOMIZED FIRE RESCUE TRAINING IN( 1284 Cargill Reimb. -SRU Training- HAZMAT; SCBj 1329 MBFTE reimb. -Live Burn 255 Broadway E. 1330 MBFTE reimb. -Car Fire prop; SCBA Conf. Prol Check Total: Vendor: 1129 DAHLHEIMER BEVERAGE LLC Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 768.00 Check Sequence: 25 ACH Enabled: False 180.00 11/27/2018 101-41410-431990 13.63 11/27/2018 101-41410-433100 193.63 Check Sequence: 26 ACH Enabled: True 180.00 11/27/2018 609-49750-425200 180.00 Check Sequence: 27 ACH Enabled: False 245.00 11/27/2018 101-41410-431990 1.09 11/27/2018 101-41410-433100 246.09 Check Sequence: 28 ACH Enabled: False 1,500.00 11/27/2018 601-00000-220111 -293.45 11/27/2018 601-49440-371100 -21.64 11/27/2018 601-00000-208100 1,184.91 Check Sequence: 29 ACH Enabled: False 7.96 11/27/2018 101-41110-431990 7.96 Check Sequence: 30 ACH Enabled: True 30.74 11/27/2018 101-41520-433100 30.74 Check Sequence: 31 ACH Enabled: False 1,525.00 11/27/2018 101-42200-433100 1,500.00 11/27/2018 101-42200-433100 1,800.00 11/27/2018 101-42200-433100 4,825.00 Check Sequence: 32 ACH Enabled: True AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/21/2018 - 12:13 PM) Page 5 Invoice No Description 1382458 resale - beer 192451 resale - beer 192451 resale - beer n/a 192766 resale - beer 192766 resale - beer n/a 192993 resale - beer credit 193160 resale - beer Check Total: AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/21/2018 - 12:13 PM) Amount Payment Date Acct Number 256.00 Check Total: Vendor: 2351 AGNES DEMARAIS 11/20/2018 Election Judge 2018 (21 hrs) 11/20/2018 Election Judge 2018 Mileage (22 miles) 31.00 Check Total: Vendor: 2050 DEMVI LLC 11/20/2018 Dec - Parking Lot Easement Maint Agreement 11/27/2018 Check Total: Vendor: 4578 JANET DOUCETTE 11/20/2018 Election Judge 2018 (17.5 hrs) 11/20/2018 Election Judge 2018 Mileage (22 miles) 11/27/2018 Check Total: Vendor: 2354 ROSEANNE DURAN 11/20/2018 Head Election Judge 2018 (41.5 hrs) Check Total: Vendor: 1153 ECM PUBLISHERS INC 643196 General Election Ad# 868011 643198 201848 - PH McCarty Ad# 870471 643199 Notice of Public Testing Ad# 871633 Check Total: Vendor: 3203 KERI LEE ERICKSON 11/20/2018 Election Judge 2018 (20 hrs) 11/20/2018 Election Judge 2018 Mileage (39 miles) Check Total: AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/21/2018 - 12:13 PM) Amount Payment Date Acct Number 256.00 11/27/2018 609-49750-425200 6,068.15 11/27/2018 609-49750-425200 31.00 11/27/2018 609-49750-425400 22,485.25 11/27/2018 609-49750-425200 171.00 11/27/2018 609-49750-425400 -197.20 11/27/2018 609-49750-425200 2,361.15 11/27/2018 609-49750-425200 31,175.35 210.00 11.99 221.99 121.60 121.60 175.00 11.99 186.99 580.00 580.00 387.66 92.30 84.61 564.57 200.00 21.26 221.26 Check Sequence: 33 11/27/2018 101-41410-431990 11/27/2018 101-41410-433100 Check Sequence: 34 11/27/2018 213-46301-443990 Check Sequence: 35 11/27/2018 101-41410-431990 11/27/2018 101-41410-433100 Check Sequence: 36 11/27/2018 101-41410-431990 Check Sequence: 37 11/27/2018 101-41410-435100 11/27/2018 101-41910-435100 11/27/2018 101-41410-435100 Check Sequence: 38 11/27/2018 101-41410-431990 11/27/2018 101-41410-433100 Reference ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: False Page 6 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Vendor: 5003 EUREKA CONSTRUCTION INC Check Sequence: 39 ACH Enabled: True Pay Voucher #5 16C006 - Fallon Overpass - Pay Voucher #5 1,266,346.11 11/27/2018 400-43300-459018 Permit Refund refund Water Use Permit - Depost $1500-$545.2 1,500.00 11/27/2018 601-00000-220111 Permit Refund refund Water Use Permit - Depost $1500-$545.2 -507.83 11/27/2018 601-49440-371100 Permit Refund refund Water Use Permit - Depost $1500-$545.2 -37.45 11/27/2018 601-00000-208100 Check Total: 1,267,300.83 Vendor: 2273 FIBERNET MONTICELLO - ACH Check Sequence: 40 ACH Enabled: True 11/8/2018 City Hall Phone - Nov 2018 638.47 11/27/2018 702-00000-432100 11/8/2018 MCC Phone - Nov 2018 560.11 11/27/2018 702-00000-432100 11/8/2018 Ballfields Phone - Nov 2018 19.57 11/27/2018 702-00000-432100 11/8/2018 DMV Phone - Nov 2018 269.94 11/27/2018 702-00000-432100 11/8/2018 Hi Way Liquor Phone - Nov 2018 343.31 11/27/2018 702-00000-432100 11/8/2018 Fire Hall Phone - Nov 2018 206.72 11/27/2018 702-00000-432100 11/8/2018 Public Works Phone - Nov 2018 260.90 11/27/2018 702-00000-432100 11/8/2018 Parks Phone - Nov 2018 114.15 11/27/2018 702-00000-432100 11/8/2018 Prairie Center Phone - Nov 2018 14.22 11/27/2018 702-00000-432100 11/8/2018 Sheriff Phone - Nov 2018 69.87 11/27/2018 702-00000-432100 11/8/2018 City Hall Internet - Nov 2018 134.95 11/27/2018 702-00000-432300 11/8/2018 MCC Internet - Nov 2018 10.00 11/27/2018 702-00000-432300 11/8/2018 Ballfields Internet - Nov 2018 10.00 11/27/2018 702-00000-432300 11/8/2018 DMV Internet - Nov 2018 81.95 11/27/2018 702-00000-432300 11/8/2018 Hi Way Liquor Internet - Nov 2018 41.95 11/27/2018 702-00000-432300 11/8/2018 Fire Hall Internet - Nov 2018 41.95 11/27/2018 702-00000-432300 11/8/2018 Animal Shelter Internet - Nov 2018 29.95 11/27/2018 702-00000-432300 11/8/2018 Public Works Internet - Nov 2018 69.95 11/27/2018 702-00000-432300 11/8/2018 Sheriff Internet - Nov 2018 41.95 11/27/2018 702-00000-432300 11/8/2018 F.I. Internet - Nov 2018 40.63 11/27/2018 702-00000-432300 11/8/2018 Fire Hall Cable - Nov 2018 5.11 11/27/2018 101-42200-431990 11/8/2018 City Hall Cable - Nov 2018 12.95 11/27/2018 101-41310-431990 11/8/2018 MCC Cable - Nov 2018 609.81 11/27/2018 226-45127-432500 11/8/2018 City Hall Data Hosting - Nov 2018 500.00 11/27/2018 702-00000-431900 11/8/2018 City Hall Service Contract - Nov 2018 250.00 11/27/2018 702-00000-431900 Check Total: 4,378.41 Vendor: 1662 FLAHERTY'S HAPPY TYME COMPANY Check Sequence: 41 ACH Enabled: False 34804 resale - mix 256.50 11/27/2018 609-49750-425500 Check Total: 256.50 Vendor: 4579 DOROTHY FRIDGEN Check Sequence: 42 ACH Enabled: False AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/21/2018 - 12:13 PM) Page 7 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 11/20/2018 Election Judge 2018 (17.5 hrs) 175.00 11/27/2018 101-41410-431990 11/20/2018 Election Judge 2018 Mileage (20 miles) 10.90 11/27/2018 101-41410-433100 Check Total: 185.90 Vendor: 3965 MARK GILBERTS Check Sequence: 43 ACH Enabled: False 11/20/2018 Election Judge 2018 (10 hrs) 100.00 11/27/2018 101-41410-431990 11/20/2018 Election Judge 2018 Mileage (26 miles) 14.17 11/27/2018 101-41410-433100 Check Total: 114.17 Vendor: 1859 GODFATHER'S EXTERMINATING INC Check Sequence: 44 ACH Enabled: False 137333 Pest control - Mice (Prairie Center) 50.00 11/27/2018 101-41941-431990 137357 Pest control - Ants (MCC) 80.00 11/27/2018 226-45126-431990 137358 Pest control - Ants (DMV) 35.00 11/27/2018 217-41990-431990 137359 Pest control - Ants (Library) 50.00 11/27/2018 101-45501-431990 137360 Pest control - general pest; spot sprayed int. 59.06 11/27/2018 609-49754-431990 Check Total: 274.06 Vendor: 1205 GRAINGER INC Check Sequence: 45 ACH Enabled: False 9950064916 Shaft Collar Clamps (2) 14.66 11/27/2018 226-45126-422990 9955734042 Office Sign 5.13 11/27/2018 226-45126-422990 9955734042 Office Sign 5.13 11/27/2018 101-41941-422990 Check Total: 24.92 Vendor: 4580 MATTHEW GRISWOLD Check Sequence: 46 ACH Enabled: True 11/20/2018 Election Judge 2018 (18.5 hrs) 185.00 11/27/2018 101-41410-431990 11/20/2018 Election Judge 2018 Mileage (30 miles) 16.35 11/27/2018 101-41410-433100 Check Total: 201.35 Vendor: 5108 GUARDIAN FLEET SAFETY Check Sequence: 47 ACH Enabled: True 18-00390 Tender 3- repairs dome light; single dash; etc 141.80 11/27/2018 101-42200-440500 Check Total: 141.80 Vendor: 3553 HARVEST BANK Check Sequence: 48 ACH Enabled: False 11/20/2018 Principal - 2013 G.O Certificates of Indebtednes 65,000.00 11/27/2018 703-00000-231200 11/20/2018 Interest - 2013 G.O Certificates of Indebtedness, 3,712.50 11/27/2018 703-00000-461100 Check Total: 68,712.50 Vendor: 1223 HAWKINS INC Check Sequence: 49 ACH Enabled: True AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/21/2018 - 12:13 PM) Page 8 Invoice No Description 4400837 Pool Chemicals Amount Check Total: Vendor: 4581 LEE RENEE HITTER 11/20/2018 Election Judge 2018 (18.5 hrs) 11/20/2018 Election Judge 2018 Mileage (53 miles) Check Total: Vendor: 3206 WILLIAM M HOFFARTH 11/20/2018 Election Judge 2018 (19.5 hrs) 11/20/2018 Election Judge 2018 Mileage (52 miles) 11/27/2018 Check Total: Vendor: 4218 HOHENSTEINS, INC 104026 resale - beer Amount Check Total: Vendor: 3207 LOIS MARIE HULTBERG 11/20/2018 Election Judge 2018 (17 hrs) 11/20/2018 Election Judge 2018 Mileage (20 miles) Check Total: Vendor: 1259 JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING 2869472 resale - beer 2869472 freight 11/27/2018 Check Total: Vendor: 1263 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 1145613 resale - liquor 1145613 freight 1145614 freight 1145614 resale- wine 1148133 resale - liquor 1148133 freight 1148134 freight 1148134 resale - wine 1148921 resale - liquor 1148921 freight Amount Payment Date Acct Number 618.04 11/27/2018 226-45124-421600 618.04 Check Sequence: 50 185.00 11/27/2018 101-41410-431990 28.89 11/27/2018 101-41410-433100 213.89 Check Sequence: 51 195.00 11/27/2018 101-41410-431990 28.34 11/27/2018 101-41410-433100 223.34 Check Sequence: 52 951.30 11/27/2018 609-49750-425200 951.30 Check Sequence: 53 170.00 11/27/2018 101-41410-431990 10.90 11/27/2018 101-41410-433100 180.90 Check Sequence: 54 1,876.85 11/27/2018 609-49750-425200 3.00 11/27/2018 609-49750-433300 1,879.85 Check Sequence: 55 1,574.29 11/27/2018 609-49750-425100 12.17 11/27/2018 609-49750-433300 52.89 11/27/2018 609-49750-433300 2,682.49 11/27/2018 609-49750-425300 1,672.18 11/27/2018 609-49750-425100 18.13 11/27/2018 609-49750-433300 29.80 11/27/2018 609-49750-433300 1,194.49 11/27/2018 609-49750-425300 2,518.60 11/27/2018 609-49750-425100 25.33 11/27/2018 609-49750-433300 Reference ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/21/2018 - 12:13 PM) Page 9 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 1148922 freight 73.01 11/27/2018 609-49750-433300 1148922 resale - wine 2,184.39 11/27/2018 609-49750-425300 1149810 resale - liquor 2,913.00 11/27/2018 609-49750-425100 1149810 freight 42.34 11/27/2018 609-49750-433300 1149811 freight 43.59 11/27/2018 609-49750-433300 1149811 resale - wine 2,240.04 11/27/2018 609-49750-425300 1149811 resale - mix 41.35 11/27/2018 609-49750-425400 1149812 resale - beer 22.99 11/27/2018 609-49750-425200 1151312 resale - liquor 1,551.53 11/27/2018 609-49750-425100 1151312 freight 19.37 11/27/2018 609-49750-433300 1151313 freight 40.05 11/27/2018 609-49750-433300 1151313 resale - wine 2,156.31 11/27/2018 609-49750-425300 1153954 resale - liquor 1,984.76 11/27/2018 609-49750-425100 1153954 freight 29.80 11/27/2018 609-49750-433300 1153955 freight 10.43 11/27/2018 609-49750-433300 1153955 resale- wine 543.88 11/27/2018 609-49750-425300 508180 resale - liquor credit inv. #1129486 -85.50 11/27/2018 609-49750-425100 508180 freight credit inv. #1129486 -1.49 11/27/2018 609-49750-433300 509549 resale - liquor credit inv. #1139997 -16.39 11/27/2018 609-49750-425100 510003 resale -liquor credit inv.#1144494 -136.17 11/27/2018 609-49750-425100 510003 freight credit inv. #1144494 -1.73 11/27/2018 609-49750-433300 510004 freight credit inv. #1144494 -1.49 11/27/2018 609-49750-433300 510004 resale - liquor credit inv. #1144494 -126.00 11/27/2018 609-49750-425100 510339 freight- credit inv. #1142947 -0.12 11/27/2018 609-49750-433300 510339 resale - liquor credit inv. #1142947 -11.17 11/27/2018 609-49750-425100 510340 resale - wine credit inv. #1142948 -92.85 11/27/2018 609-49750-425300 510340 freight credit inv. #1142948 -2.98 11/27/2018 609-49750-433300 510703 resale -liquor credit inv. #1145613 -484.60 11/27/2018 609-49750-425100 510703 freight -credit inv.#1145613 -0.25 11/27/2018 609-49750-433300 Check Total: 22,716.47 Vendor: 5130 KDK BUILDERS Check Sequence: 56 ACH Enabled: False 11-12-18 Set Building Plans- exist. floor plan layout; remc 400.00 11/27/2018 101-45204-431990 Check Total: 400.00 Vendor: 3852 LASER MEMORIES Check Sequence: 57 ACH Enabled: False 1095 Office Name Plate (SD) 23.00 11/27/2018 226-45125-421990 Check Total: 23.00 Vendor: 4907 MATTHEW LEONARD Check Sequence: 58 ACH Enabled: False AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/21/2018 - 12:13 PM) Page 10 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 10/10/2018 Mileage Reimbursement (June - Sept) (237 mile: 129.17 11/27/2018 101-43110-433100 10/10/2018 Reimbursement - Parking Fee 5.00 11/27/2018 101-43110-433100 11/9/2018 MBA Tuition Reimbursement (1/3) 900.00 11/27/2018 101-43110-433100 11/9/2018 MBA Tuition Reimbursement (1/3) 300.00 11/27/2018 601-49440-433100 11/9/2018 MBA Tuition Reimbursement (1/3) 300.00 11/27/2018 602-49490-433100 Check Total: 1,634.17 Vendor: 4456 LUPULIN BREWING LLC Check Sequence: 59 ACH Enabled: True 16550 resale - beer 378.00 11/27/2018 609-49750-425200 16737 resale - beer 325.00 11/27/2018 609-49750-425200 16889 resale - beer 126.00 11/27/2018 609-49750-425200 Check Total: 829.00 Vendor: 1303 M AMUNDSON CIGAR & CANDY CO, LLP Check Sequence: 60 ACH Enabled: True 269615 resale - cigarettes 846.80 11/27/2018 609-49750-425500 269615 resale - tobacco; barware; soda pop 333.31 11/27/2018 609-49750-425400 Check Total: 1,180.11 Vendor: 5132 MAINSTREET DESIGNS INC Check Sequence: 61 ACH Enabled: False 27975 New Banners for Streets (150) 13,575.00 11/27/2018 400-43300-443990 Check Total: 13,575.00 Vendor: 3745 MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY Check Sequence: 62 ACH Enabled: True 21054481 (650) gal. diesel @ $2.89 1,876.69 11/27/2018 101-43120-421200 21054482 (649) gal. unleaded @ $2.21 1,434.06 11/27/2018 101-43120-421200 Check Total: 3,310.75 Vendor: 1726 MARCO TECHNOLOGIES Check Sequence: 63 ACH Enabled: False INV5748785 Supply Freight Fee 46.00 11/27/2018 702-00000-441500 INV5748785 11/10/18 - 12/9/18 Contract Payment 935.58 11/27/2018 702-00000-441500 INV5748786 11/10/18 - 12/9/18 Contract Payment 214.29 11/27/2018 702-00000-441500 Check Total: 1,195.87 Vendor: 4667 MILLNER VINEYARD, LLC Check Sequence: 64 ACH Enabled: False 211918-1 resale - wine 623.40 11/27/2018 609-49750-425300 Check Total: 623.40 Vendor: 1346 MN DEPT OF HEALTH Check Sequence: 65 ACH Enabled: False AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/21/2018 - 12:13 PM) Page 11 Invoice No Description FBL-13905-15733 2019 License Renewal Application for Food & F Amount Check Total: Vendor: 1373 MONTICELLO SCHOOL DISTRICT #882 11/20/2018 ZMISMS - Addt'l Escrow Refund 11/27/2018 Check Total: Vendor: 1377 MONTICELLO SENIOR CENTER Nov 2018 Monthly Allocation - Nov 2018 Check Total: Vendor: 4186 MONTICELLO TOWING, LLC 23310 F-350 tow from PW to Elk River Ford ACH Enabled: Check Total: Vendor: 2368 JUDITH MOODY 11/20/2018 Election Judge 2018 (19 Ins) 11/20/2018 Election Judge 2018 Mileage (22 miles) Check Total: Vendor: 2818 RUTH MORGAN 11/20/2018 Election Judge 2018 (20.5 Ins) 11/20/2018 Election Judge 2018 Mileage (100 miles) True Check Total: Vendor: 4583 MERRIJO MOYER 11/20/2018 Election Judge 2018 (20 Ins) 11/20/2018 Election Judge 2018 Mileage (104 miles) Check Total: Vendor: 4838 NORTH RISK PARTNERS - APOLLO DIVISI( 2994117 Work Comp Ins 10/10/18 - 10/10/19 ACH Enabled: Check Total: Vendor: 4651 NORTHERN HOLLOW WINERY L.L.C. 1392 resale - wine Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 980.00 11/27/2018 226-45122-443700 980.00 Check Sequence: 66 ACH Enabled: False 267.67 11/27/2018 101-00000-220110 267.67 Check Sequence: 67 ACH Enabled: True 5,013.33 11/27/2018 101-45175-444310 5,013.33 Check Sequence: 68 ACH Enabled: False 150.00 11/27/2018 101-43127-431990 150.00 Check Sequence: 69 ACH Enabled: False 190.00 11/27/2018 101-41410-431990 11.99 11/27/2018 101-41410-433100 201.99 Check Sequence: 70 ACH Enabled: False 205.00 11/27/2018 101-41410-431990 54.50 11/27/2018 101-41410-433100 259.50 Check Sequence: 71 ACH Enabled: False 200.00 11/27/2018 101-41410-431990 56.68 11/27/2018 101-41410-433100 256.68 Check Sequence: 72 ACH Enabled: False 134,324.00 11/27/2018 101-00000-155010 134,324.00 Check Sequence: 73 ACH Enabled: False 257.28 11/27/2018 609-49750-425300 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/21/2018 - 12:13 PM) Page 12 Invoice No Description Check Total: Vendor: 4633 PERFORMANCE FOOD GROUP INC 53397098 Cheese Sauce for Concession Check Total: Vendor: 2386 DIANE PETERS 11/20/2018 Election Judge 2018 (16.5 hrs) 11/20/2018 Election Judge 2018 Mileage (22 miles) Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 257.28 Check Total: Vendor: 1401 NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANT 23903 Oct 2018 - Technical Assistance - City Projects 23905 Enabled: Oct 2018 - Technical Assistance - Meetings 3,999.70 11/27/2018 Check Total: Vendor: 1411 OLSON & SONS ELECTRIC INC 57572 11/27/2018 labor- rewire pole; (2) repl. ballast; rep. lamp 57572 labor -(2) ballast; (3) hr. lg. bucket truck; lamp 57609 labor- rep. fixture head; sep. spare light head; trb 57609 materials - lg. bucket truck; fuse midget Check Total: Vendor: 1412 OMANN BROTHERS INC 13583 11/27/2018 (2) AC Fines mix 13588 (3.01) AC Fines mix 475.17 11/27/2018 Check Total: Vendor: 2387 FRANK OPAY 11/20/2018 11/27/2018 Election Judge 2018 (18 Hrs) Check Total: Vendor: 1273 PAUSTIS & SONS WINE CO 30187 resale - wine 30187 freight 31529 freight 31529 resale - wine Check Total: Vendor: 4633 PERFORMANCE FOOD GROUP INC 53397098 Cheese Sauce for Concession Check Total: Vendor: 2386 DIANE PETERS 11/20/2018 Election Judge 2018 (16.5 hrs) 11/20/2018 Election Judge 2018 Mileage (22 miles) Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 257.28 Check Sequence: 74 ACH Enabled: True 3,999.70 11/27/2018 101-41910-431990 300.00 11/27/2018 101-41910-431990 4,299.70 Check Sequence: 75 ACH Enabled: True 427.50 11/27/2018 101-43160-431990 475.17 11/27/2018 101-43160-431990 407.50 11/27/2018 101-43160-431990 235.08 11/27/2018 101-43160-431990 1,545.25 Check Sequence: 76 ACH Enabled: False 163.76 11/27/2018 101-43120-422400 246.46 11/27/2018 101-43120-422400 410.22 Check Sequence: 77 ACH Enabled: False 180.00 11/27/2018 101-41410-431990 180.00 Check Sequence: 78 ACH Enabled: False 480.00 11/27/2018 609-49750-425300 8.75 11/27/2018 609-49750-433300 23.75 11/27/2018 609-49750-433300 1,855.50 11/27/2018 609-49750-425300 2,368.00 Check Sequence: 79 ACH Enabled: True 747.15 11/27/2018 226-45125-425410 747.15 Check Sequence: 80 ACH Enabled: False 165.00 11/27/2018 101-41410-431990 11.99 11/27/2018 101-41410-433100 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/21/2018 - 12:13 PM) Page 13 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Check Total: 176.99 Vendor: 1427 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS CO Check Sequence: 81 ACH Enabled: False 2452195 resale - liquor 2,020.30 11/27/2018 609-49750-425100 2452195 freight 17.88 11/27/2018 609-49750-433300 2452196 freight 52.15 11/27/2018 609-49750-433300 2452196 resale - wine 2,308.65 11/27/2018 609-49750-425300 2454055 resale - liquor 496.00 11/27/2018 609-49750-425100 2454055 freight 4.47 11/27/2018 609-49750-433300 2454056 freight 17.88 11/27/2018 609-49750-433300 2454056 resale - wine 594.00 11/27/2018 609-49750-425300 2454056 resale - wine n/a 112.50 11/27/2018 609-49750-425400 2454522 resale - liquor 906.40 11/27/2018 609-49750-425100 2454522 freight 10.43 11/27/2018 609-49750-433300 2454523 freight 36.13 11/27/2018 609-49750-433300 2454523 resale - wine 1,724.00 11/27/2018 609-49750-425300 2455145 resale - liquor 3,799.50 11/27/2018 609-49750-425100 2455145 freight 35.08 11/27/2018 609-49750-433300 2456249 freight 1.49 11/27/2018 609-49750-433300 2456249 resale - liquor 90.00 11/27/2018 609-49750-425100 2456250 resale - wine 1,368.16 11/27/2018 609-49750-425300 2456250 resale - wine n/a 171.00 11/27/2018 609-49750-425400 2456250 freight 47.17 11/27/2018 609-49750-433300 2458252 freight 84.24 11/27/2018 609-49750-433300 2458252 resale - liquor 5,772.21 11/27/2018 609-49750-425100 310984 resale - liquor credit inv. #2446886 -1,266.00 11/27/2018 609-49750-425100 310984 freight credit inv. #2446886 -8.94 11/27/2018 609-49750-433300 311672 resale - liquor credit inv. #2448342 -76.65 11/27/2018 609-49750-425100 311672 freight credit inv. 42448342 -1.49 11/27/2018 609-49750-433300 311673 freight credit inv. 92451336 -2.98 11/27/2018 609-49750-433300 311673 resale - liquor credit inv. #2451336 -380.00 11/27/2018 609-49750-425100 312016 resale - wine credit inv. # 2452196 -48.00 11/27/2018 609-49750-425300 312016 freight credit inv. # 2452196 -1.49 11/27/2018 609-49750-433300 Check Total: 17,884.09 Vendor: 5140 PRECISE HEATING A/C PLUMBING AND RI Check Sequence: 82 ACH Enabled: False 11/16/2018 GMEF Loan Draw #1 - Boiler & Chiller Equiprr 78,831.00 11/27/2018 213-46601-181200 Check Total: 78,831.00 Vendor: 1443 QUALITY FLOW SYSTEMS INC Check Sequence: 83 ACH Enabled: False AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/21/2018 - 12:13 PM) Page 14 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 36210 (3) oil plugs - pump parts 174.99 11/27/2018 602-49490-422100 Check Total: 174.99 Vendor: 4584 MARY RAUSCH Check Sequence: 84 ACH Enabled: False 11/20/2018 Election Judge 2018 (8 hrs) 80.00 11/27/2018 101-41410-431990 Check Total: 80.00 Vendor: 1455 RED'S MARATHON Check Sequence: 85 ACH Enabled: False 10-2018 Parks Parks Oct. slips- (13) non-oxy fuel during fuel p 681.37 11/27/2018 101-45201-421200 10-2018 PW #414; #143; #155 non oxy 199.17 11/27/2018 101-43120-421200 Check Total: 880.54 Vendor: 4022 REINHART FOODSERVICE LLC Check Sequence: 86 ACH Enabled: True 518380 Food for Concession Resale 581.74 11/27/2018 226-45125-425410 Check Total: 581.74 Vendor: 4962 RENGEL PRINTING COMPANY, INC Check Sequence: 87 ACH Enabled: True 105482 (100) Incident Rep. forms; Inc. Rep. 50ct. pad 111.00 11/27/2018 101-42200-421990 105735 (50) Inc. Rep. Continuation; (2) new truck blue I 65.95 11/27/2018 101-42200-421990 Check Total: 176.95 Vendor: 4781 RUE 38 LLC Check Sequence: 88 ACH Enabled: False 4342 resale - wine 376.00 11/27/2018 609-49750-425300 4342 freight 4.50 11/27/2018 609-49750-433300 Check Total: 380.50 Vendor: 1470 RUSSELL SECURITY RESOURCE INC Check Sequence: 89 ACH Enabled: True A33447 ReKey Existing Lock Cylinder 100.00 11/27/2018 226-45126-440100 Check Total: 100.00 Vendor: 1474 PATRICIAA SALZWEDEL Check Sequence: 90 ACH Enabled: True Nov 2nd Semi Monthly Contract Payment 1,593.75 11/27/2018 101-42700-431200 Check Total: 1,593.75 Vendor: 2374 JAMES SANBORN Check Sequence: 91 ACH Enabled: False 11/20/2018 Election Judge 2018 (19 hrs) 190.00 11/27/2018 101-41410-431990 11/20/2018 Election Judge 2018 Mileage (44 miles) 23.98 11/27/2018 101-41410-433100 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/21/2018 - 12:13 PM) Page 15 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number 213.98 Check Total: Vendor: 4981 STEVE SCHILLEWAERT 101828 Riverside - Oct. Fall clean up; mow;(2) litter/del 101829 Hilside - Oct. (2) mow; litter/debris; Right of Wa 651-49010-431050 Check Total: Vendor: 4586 MICHAEL PAUL SCHMIDT 11/20/2018 Election Judge 2018 (20 hrs) 11/20/2018 Election Judge 2018 Mileage (22 miles) Check Total: Vendor: 3216 MERRLYN L SEEFELDT 11/20/2018 Election Judge 2018 (9 hrs) 11/27/2018 Check Total: Vendor: 5138 WILLIAM SEEFELDT 11/20/2018 Election Judge 2018 (10 hrs) Check Total: Vendor: 4587 SHARI LYNN SNYDER 11/20/2018 Election Judge 2018 (28.5 hrs) 11/20/2018 Election Judge 2018 Mileage (40 miles) Check Total: Vendor: 2377 DARLENE SOLBERG 11/20/2018 Election Judge 2018 (19 hrs) 11/20/2018 Election Judge 2018 Mileage (40 miles) Check Total: Vendor: 3309 SOUTHERN GLAZER'S WINE AND SPIRITS. 1750383 resale - liquor 1750383 freight 1750384 freight 1750384 resale - wine 1753086 freight 1753086 resale - liquor 1753087 resale - wine Amount Payment Date Acct Number 213.98 Check Sequence: 92 4,550.00 11/27/2018 651-49010-431050 650.00 11/27/2018 101-45201-431050 5,200.00 Check Sequence: 93 200.00 11/27/2018 101-41410-431990 11.99 11/27/2018 101-41410-433100 211.99 Check Sequence: 94 90.00 11/27/2018 101-41410-431990 90.00 Check Sequence: 95 100.00 11/27/2018 101-41410-431990 100.00 Check Sequence: 96 285.00 11/27/2018 101-41410-431990 21.80 11/27/2018 101-41410-433100 306.80 Check Sequence: 97 190.00 11/27/2018 101-41410-431990 21.80 11/27/2018 101-41410-433100 211.80 Check Sequence: 98 883.34 11/27/2018 609-49750-425100 8.63 11/27/2018 609-49750-433300 30.22 11/27/2018 609-49750-433300 1,793.32 11/27/2018 609-49750-425300 39.20 11/27/2018 609-49750-433300 3,902.92 11/27/2018 609-49750-425100 2,871.14 11/27/2018 609-49750-425300 Reference ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/21/2018 - 12:13 PM) Page 16 Invoice No Description 1753087 freight Amount Check Total: Vendor: 4874 SPLASH SCHOOL LLC 4167 Life Guard Training (8) Check Total: Vendor: 1518 TDS TELECOM 763-271-3257 TDS 763-295-2005 TDS 763-295-3714 TDS Check Total: Vendor: 2380 PATRICIA THIELMAN 11/20/2018 Election Judge 2018 (27 hrs) 11/20/2018 Election Judge 2018 Mileage (22 miles) Check Total: Vendor: 5131 TRANSPORT GRAPHICS EM- 127677 18' boat wrap; install 3M Certified Check Total: Vendor: 4656 TRUE FABRICATIONS, INC. 412446 resale - liquor 412446 resale - mix 412446 freight True Check Total: Vendor: 1188 TWAIT WINES, INC 2883 resale - wine Check Total: Vendor: 1543 US BANK TRUST SERVICES 5156120 G.O. Bonds 2017A Paying Agent Fee 10/l/18 - 5 5164103 G.O. Bonds 2018A - Acceptance Fee 5164103 G.O. Bonds 2018A- Paying Agent Fee 10/1/18 - Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 50.40 11/27/2018 609-49750-433300 9,579.17 Check Sequence: 99 ACH Enabled: False 1,800.00 11/27/2018 226-45127-431990 1,800.00 Check Sequence: 100 ACH Enabled: True 99.69 11/27/2018 702-00000-432100 20.16 11/27/2018 702-00000-432100 345.51 11/27/2018 702-00000-432100 465.36 Check Sequence: 101 ACH Enabled: False 270.00 11/27/2018 101-41410-431990 11.99 11/27/2018 101-41410-433100 281.99 Check Sequence: 102 ACH Enabled: False 1,022.37 11/27/2018 101-42200-440500 1,022.37 Check Sequence: 103 ACH Enabled: False 411.81 11/27/2018 609-49750-425100 279.98 11/27/2018 609-49750-425400 83.01 11/27/2018 609-49750-433300 774.80 Check Sequence: 104 ACH Enabled: False 234.00 11/27/2018 609-49750-425300 234.00 Check Sequence: 105 ACH Enabled: False 450.00 11/27/2018 321-47000-462010 350.00 11/27/2018 400-43300-462030 500.00 11/27/2018 400-43300-462030 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/21/2018 - 12:13 PM) Page 17 Invoice No Description Check Total Vendor: Check Total: Vendor: 1544 US POSTAL SERVICE 11/8/2018 PI 42 - UB Nov Billing (3,715 pcs) (1/2) 11/8/2018 PI 42 - UB Nov Billing (3,715 pcs) (1/2) resale - soda pop Check Total: Vendor: 5139 VIKING BEVERAGE 2156152 resale - beer Check Total Vendor: 1552 VIKING COCA COLA BOTTLING CO 2247754 Enabled: resale - soda pop 2253487 11/27/2018 resale - soda pop Check Total: Vendor: 1684 VINOCOPIA 0219474 freight 0219474 resale - liquor 0219474 resale - wine 0220208 resale - wine 0220208 Enabled: resale - liquor 0220208 11/27/2018 resale - mix 0220208 freight 0220347 freight 0220347 resale- wine Check Total: Vendor: 5133 VOLUNTEER FIREFIGHTERS' BENEFIT AS' Membership 2018 (37) Protective Membership 2018 - Fire Dept. 609-49750-425400 Check Total: Vendor: 1561 WATER LABORATORIES INC 7129 Oct. 2018 Water Testing 865.60 Check Total: Vendor: 1567 WES OLSON ELECTRIC LLC 8870 Material - Spare Timer Amount Payment Date Acct Number 1,300.00 Reference AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/21/2018 - 12:13 PM) Page 18 Check Sequence: 106 ACH Enabled: False 850.73 11/27/2018 601-49440-432200 850.74 11/27/2018 602-49490-432200 1,701.47 Check Sequence: 107 ACH Enabled: False 25.00 11/27/2018 609-49750-425200 25.00 Check Sequence: 108 ACH Enabled: True 356.95 11/27/2018 609-49750-425400 508.65 11/27/2018 609-49750-425400 865.60 Check Sequence: 109 ACH Enabled: True 16.00 11/27/2018 609-49750-433300 80.40 11/27/2018 609-49750-425100 792.00 11/27/2018 609-49750-425300 447.00 11/27/2018 609-49750-425300 112.75 11/27/2018 609-49750-425100 240.00 11/27/2018 609-49750-425400 27.00 11/27/2018 609-49750-433300 12.50 11/27/2018 609-49750-433300 480.00 11/27/2018 609-49750-425300 2,207.65 Check Sequence: 110 ACH Enabled: False 528.00 11/27/2018 101-42200-443990 528.00 Check Sequence: 111 ACH Enabled: False 240.00 11/27/2018 601-49440-422740 240.00 Check Sequence: 112 ACH Enabled: False 85.00 11/27/2018 226-45124-443990 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/21/2018 - 12:13 PM) Page 18 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 8890 Labor - Replace 3 Way Switches (2) 80.00 11/27/2018 217-41990-440100 8890 Materials - Replace 3 Way Switches (2) 4.50 11/27/2018 217-41990-440100 8895 Material - Ballast, Hardware, Socket 31.80 11/27/2018 609-49754-440100 8895 Material - Ballast, Hardware, Socket 29.30 11/27/2018 101-45501-440100 8895 Labor- Light Repair 150.00 11/27/2018 101-45501-440100 8895 Labor- Light Repair 150.00 11/27/2018 609-49754-440100 8904 labor- install (4) emergecy lights- Fire 195.00 11/27/2018 101-42200-440100 8904 Materials - (4) LED; (12) wire nut; (4) lamp recy 146.88 11/27/2018 101-42200-440100 Check Total: 872.48 Vendor: 1568 WEST SHERBURNE TRIBUNE Check Sequence: 113 ACH Enabled: False 79768 Wine Sale 10/27- color ad 366.00 11/27/2018 609-49754-434990 Check Total: 366.00 Vendor: 4766 SUSAN WESTLEY Check Sequence: 114 ACH Enabled: False Sept/Oct 2018 Sue Seeger- Creative Arts Srvc. Sept/Oct. 2018 2,500.00 11/27/2018 101-45204-431990 Check Total: 2,500.00 Vendor: 4588 THERESA WILLENBRING Check Sequence: 115 ACH Enabled: False 11/20/2018 Election Judge 2018 (17.5 hrs) 175.00 11/27/2018 101-41410-431990 11/20/2018 Election Judge 2018 Mileage (20 miles) 10.90 11/27/2018 101-41410-433100 Check Total: 185.90 Vendor: 1572 THE WINE COMPANY Check Sequence: 116 ACH Enabled: True 89059 resale- wine 240.00 11/27/2018 609-49750-425300 89059 freight 10.00 11/27/2018 609-49750-433300 Check Total: 250.00 Vendor: 1573 WINE MERCHANTS INC Check Sequence: 117 ACH Enabled: False 7208478 freight 7.45 11/27/2018 609-49750-433300 7208478 resale- wine 477.00 11/27/2018 609-49750-425300 7208798 resale- wine 520.00 11/27/2018 609-49750-425300 7208798 freight 7.45 11/27/2018 609-49750-433300 7209634 freight 4.47 11/27/2018 609-49750-433300 7209634 resale- wine 371.00 11/27/2018 609-49750-425300 Check Total: 1,387.37 Vendor: 1577 WRIGHT CO AUDITOR-TREAS - ACH Check Sequence: 118 ACH Enabled: True AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/21/2018 - 12:13 PM) Page 19 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number 11/14/2018 Court Fines & Fees - Oct 2018 3,520.63 11/27/2018 101-42100-430410 Check Total: 3,520.63 Vendor: 1581 WRIGHT CO RECORDER Check Sequence: 119 201800000096 Satisfaction of Mortgage - # A 1382832 46.00 11/27/2018 213-46301-431990 Check Total: 46.00 Vendor: 1579 WRIGHT COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPARTMEN Check Sequence: 120 1228 (566.35) Ton Salt 42,867.59 11/27/2018 101-43125-421700 Check Total: 42,867.59 Total for Check Run: 1,923,101.38 Total of Number of Checks: 120 The preceding list of bills payables was reviewed and approved for payment. Date: 11/26/18 Approved by: Mayor Brian Stumpf Reference ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/21/2018 - 12:13 PM) Page 20 City Council Agenda 11/26/2018 2B. Consideration of approving new hires and departures for Citv departments (TE) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The Council is asked to ratify the hiring and departures of employees that have occurred recently in the departments listed. It is recommended that the Council officially ratify the hiring/departure of all listed employees including part-time and seasonal workers. By ratifying departures, the council also approves the expenditure for final amounts due to terminated and otherwise departing employees. Al. Budget Impact: (positions are generally included in budget) A2. Staff Work Load Impact: If new positions, there may be some training involved. If terminated positions, existing staff would pick up those hours, as needed, until replaced. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to ratify the hire/departures of the employees as identified on the attached list. 2. Motion to deny the recommended hires and departures. C. RECOMMENDATION: By statute the City Council has the authority to approve all hires/departures. City staff recommends Alternative #l, for the Council to approve the hires and/or departures as listed. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • List of new/terminated employees Name Samantha Thammavongsa Angela Piepenhagen Josephine Johnston Amee Pribyl Victoria Nygaard Name Emma Lefebve Amber Schaack Kiah Lindsey James Wilson NEW EMPLOYEES Title Department Hire Date Class Clerk Liquor Store 11/12/2018 PT DMV Clerk DMV 11/13/2018 PT Guest Service MCC 11/13/2018 PT Fitness Instructor MCC 11/14/2018 PT Guest Service MCC 11/16/2018 PT TERMINATING EMPLOYEES Reason Department Voluntary MCC Voluntary MCC Voluntary MCC Involutary Liquor Store New Hire and Terms City Council 2018.xlsx: 11/19/2018 Last Day Class 6/12/18 PT 10/26/18 PT 11/6/18 PT 11/15/18 PT City Council Agenda: 11/26/2018 2C. Consideration of approving sale or disposal of surplus vroverty (WO) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The Council is asked to declare certain items as surplus property and authorize the sale or disposal of those items. The Fire Department is selling various items which include a MSA automated test system, radios/chargers, and old fire hoses. Al. Budget Impact: Varies by the value of the property. A2. Staff Work Load Impact: Depends on the value of the property. Some items will be shopped as salvage; other items may go to auction or sold via formal bids or informal bids. State contracting laws will govern in absence of city policy. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the sale or disposal of surplus property as identified on the attached lists. 2. Motion to deny the sale or disposal of surplus property as recommended. C. RECOMMENDATION: Staff Recommends Option 1 to approve the sale or disposal of surplus property as identified. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Surplus List B. Photos Equipment/Supplies Surplus List Department: Fire 1. $100,000 + A. B. 2. $50,000 - $100,000 A. B. 3. $25,000.00 - $50,000.00 A. B. 4. $10,000 - $25,000 A. B. C. 5. $2,500 - $10,000 A. B. C. 6. $1,000 - $2,500 A. B. C. 7. $100 - $1,000 A. 1- MSA Automated Test System B. 3- Kenwood Tk-2360 Radios/Chargers C. 550 feet of old Fire Hose (Various Sizes) 8. $0-$100 A. B. C. Date: 11/26/2018 ol� TA ov, V) LLJ iris' � �� �y " It la A in iris' � �� �y " It la A M 40 I i City Council Agenda: 11/26/2018 2D. Consideration to approve an application for a temvorary charitable gambling permit for a raffle to be conducted by the Central Minnesota Jobs and Training Services at River Citv Extreme, 3875 School Blvd. (JS) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The Central Minnesota Jobs and Training organization has applied for a temporary charitable gambling permit for a raffle to be held on Saturday, February 8, 2019 in conjunction with a fundraiser. The event is being held at River City Extreme. To receive a permit from the State, the City must approve the application. In the past the City has not opposed these exempt gambling license applications for charitable events. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the application for a charitable gambling permit for a raffle conducted by Central Minnesota Jobs and Training Services to be held on February 8, 2019 for a fundraiser for their organization. 2. Motion to deny. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff supports Alternative #1 and requests Council to approve the application which will be submitted to the State Gambling Control Board. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • Copy of Application for Exempt Gambling Permit MINNESOTA LAWFUL GAMBLING LG220 Application for Exempt Permit An exempt permit may be issued to a nonprofit organization that: • conducts lawful gambling on five or fewer days, and • awards less than $50,000 in prizes during a calendar yea r. If total raffle prize value for the calendar year will be $1,500 or less, contact the Licensing Specialist assigned to your county by calling 651-539-1900. ORGANIZATION INFORMATION P eIof Application Fee (non-refundable) Applications are processed in the order received. If the-1 helication is postmarked or received 30 days or more before the a nt, the application fee is $100; otherwise the fee is $150. Due to the high volume of exempt applications, payment of additional fees prior to 30 days before your event will not expedite service, nor are telephone requests for expedited service accepted. Organization Previous Gambling Name: Central Minnesota ]obs and Training Services, Inc. Permit Number: Minnesota Tax ID Federal Employer ID Number, if any: 2073311 Number (FEIN), if any: 41-1484048 Mailing Address: PO Box 720 City: Monticello State: MN Zip: 55362 County: Wright Name of Chief Executive Officer (CEO): Barbara Chaffee CEO Daytime Phone: 763-271-3700 CEO Email: bchaffee@cmjts.org (permit will be emalled to this email address unless otherwise indicated below) Email permit to (if other than the CEO): Iwojtowicz@cmjts.org NONPROFIT STATUS Type of Nonprofit Organization (check one): = Fraternal = Religious Veterans 0✓ Other Nonprofit Organization Attach a copy of one of the following showing proof of nonprofit status: (DO NOT attach a sales tax exempt status or federal employer ID number, as they are not proof of nonprofit s ❑ A current calendar year Certificate of Good Standing CJ Don't have a copy? Obtain this certificate from: MN Secretary of State, Business Services Division Secretary of State website, phon (humbers: " 60 Empire Drive, Suite 100 www.sos.state.mn.us a St. Paul, MN 55103 651-296-2803, or toll free 1-8 r7 55j:-6767 F71IRS income tax exemption (501(c)) letter in your organizations name Q9 � �;//;,U ry Don't have a copy? To obtain a copy of your federal income tax exempt letter, have an organi ion off tt ri��Tii�t he IRS toll free at 1-877-829-5500. ❑ IRS Affiliate f national, idinternational nlnonprofit organization charte If youror9oation falls under aPar ntor anizatoatachoP�es of bth ofhe following: LZOZrodcv� 1. IRS letter showing your parent organization is a nonprofit 501(c) organization with a group ruling; an 2. the charter or letter from your parent organization recognizing your organization as a subordinate. GAMBLING PREMISES INFORMATION Name of premises where the gambling event will be conducted (for raffles, list the site where the drawing will take place): River City Extreme Physical Address (do not use P.O. box): 3875 School Blvd. Check one: M City: Monticello ❑ Township: Zip: 55362 Zip: Date(s) of activity (for raffles, indicate the date of the drawing): Cet___: H, ^'- `_' Check each type of gambling activity that your organization will conduct: County: Wright County: Bingo = Paddlewheels = Pull -Tabs =Tipboards 0 Raffle Gambling equipment for bingo paper, bingo boards, raffle boards, paddlewheels, pull -tabs, and tipboards must be obtained from a distributor licensed by the Minnesota Gambling Control Board. EXCEPTION: Bingo hard cards and bingo ball selection devices may be borrowed from another organization authorized to conduct bingo. To find a licensed distributor, go to www.mn.gov/gcb and click on Distributors under the List of Licensees tab, or call 651-539-1900. LG220 Application for Exempt Permit 11/17 Page 2 of 2 LOCAL UNIT OF GOVERNMENT ACKNOWLEDGMENT (required before submitting application to the Minnesota Gambling Control Board) CITY APPROVAL for a gambling premises located within city limits HThe application is acknowledged with no waiting period. The application is acknowledged with a 30 -day waiting period, and allows the Board to issue a permit after 30 days (60 days for a 1st class city). The application is denied. Print City Name: Signature of City Personnel: Title: Date: The city or county must sign before submitting application to the Gambling Control Board. COUNTY APPROVAL for a gambling premises located in a township he application is acknowledged with no waiting period. he application is acknowledged with a 30 -day waiting period, and allows the Board to issue a permit after 30 days. ❑fhe application is denied. Print County Name: Signature of County Personnel: Title: Date: TOWNSHIP (if required by the county) On behalf of the township, I acknowledge that the organization is applying for exempted gambling activity within the township limits. (A township has no statutory authority to approve or deny an application, per Minn. Statutes, section 349.213.) Print Township Name: Signature of Township Officer: Title: Date: CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S SIGNATURE (required) The information provided in this application is complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge. I acknowledge that the financial report will be completed and returned to the Board within 30 days of the event date. Chief Executive Officer's Signature: Print Name: Barbara Chaffee REQUIREMENTS Date: (Signature must be CEO's signature; designee may not sign) MAIL APPLICATION AND ATTACHMENTS Complete a separate application for: Mail application with: • all gambling conducted on two or more consecutive days; or a copy of your proof of nonprofit status; and • all gambling conducted on one day. application fee (non-refundable). If the application is Only one application is required if one or more raffle drawings are postmarked or received 30 days or more before the event, conducted on the same day. the application fee is $100; otherwise the fee is $150. Financial report to be completed within 30 days after the Make check payable to State of Minnesota. gambling activity is done: To: Minnesota Gambling Control Board A financial report form will be mailed with your permit. Complete 1711 West County Road B, Suite 300 South and return the financial report form to the Gambling Control Roseville, MN 55113 Board. Questions? Your organization must keep all exempt records and reports for Call the Licensing Section of the Gambling Control Board at 3-1/2 years (Minn. Statutes, section 349.166, subd. 2(f)). 651-539-1900. Data privacy notice: The information requested on this form (and any attachments) will be used by the Gambling Control Board (Board) to determine your organization's qualifications to be involved In lawful gambling activities in Minnesota. Your organization has the right to refuse to supply the Information; however, if your organization refuses to supply this Information, the Board may not be able to determine your organization's qualifications and, as a consequence, may refuse to issue a permit. If your organization supplies the Information requested, the Board will be able to process the application. Your organization's name and address will be public Information when received by the Board. All other Information provided will be private data about your organization until the Board issues the permit. When the Board Issues the permit, all information provided will become public. If the Board does not Issue a permit, all Information provided remains private, with the exception of your organization's name and address which will remain public. Private data about your organization are available to Board members, Board staff whose work requires access to the Information; Minnesota's Depart- ment of Public Safety; Attorney General; Commissioners of Administration, Minnesota Management & Budget, and Revenue; Legislative Auditor, national and International gambling regulatory agencies; anyone pursuant to court order; other individuals and agencies specifically authorized by state or federal law to have access to the Information; individuals and agencies for which law or legal order authorizes a new use or sharing of information after this notice was given; and anyone with your written consent. This form will be made available in alternative format (i.e. large print, braille) upon request. An equal opportunity employer Internal Revenue Service District Director Date: JUN 2 4 1999 Central Minnesota Jobs and Training Services, Inc. 106 Pine Street Monticello, MN 55362-8563 Dear Sir or Madam: Department of the Treasury P. 0. Box 2508 Cincinnati, OH 45201 Person to Contact: Brett Siereveld 31-02633 Customer Service Specialist Telephone Number: 877-829-5500 Fax Number: 513-684-5936 Federal Identification Number: 41-1484048 This letter is in response to your organization's Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation, filed with the state on September 8, 1998, and showing a name change for your organization. Our records indicate that a determination letter issued in October 1985 granted your organization exemption from federal income tax under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. That letter is still in effect. We classified your organization as one that is not a private foundation within the meaning of section 509(a) of the Code because it is an organization described in sections 509(a)(1) and 170(b)(1)(A)(vi). This classification was based on the assumption that your organization's operations would continue as stated in the application. If your organization's sources of support, or its character, method of operations, or purposes have changed, please let us know so we can consider the effect of the change on the exempt status and foundation status of your organization. Your organization is required to file Form 990, Return of Organization Exempt from Income Tax, only if its gross receipts each year are normally more than $25,000. If a return is required, it must be filed by the 15th day of the fifth month after the end of the organization's annual accounting period. The law imposes a penalty of $20 a day, up to a maximum of $10,000, when a return is filed late, unless there is reasonable cause for the delay. All exempt organizations (unless specifically excluded) are liable for taxes under the Federal Insurance Contributions Act (social security taxes) on remuneration of $100 or more paid to each employee during a calendar year. Your organization is not liable for the tax imposed under the Federal Unemployment Tax Act (FUTA). Organizations that are not private foundations are not subject to the excise taxes under Chapter 42 of the Code. However, these organizations are not automatically exempt from other federal excise taxes. .s -2 - Central Minnesota Jobs and Training Services, Inc. 41-1484048 Donors may deduct contributions to your organization as provided in section 170 of the Code. Bequests, legacies, devises, transfers, or gifts to your organization or for its use are deductible for federal estate and gift tax purposes if they meet the applicable provisions of sections 2055, 2106, and 2522 of the Code. Your organization is not required to file federal income tax returns unless it is subject to the tax on unrelated business income under section 511 of the Code. If your organization is subject to this tax, it must file an income tax return on the Form 990-T, Exempt Organization Business Income Tax Return. In this letter, we are not determining whether any of your organization's present or proposed activities are unrelated trade or business as defined in section 513 of the Code. The law requires you to make your organization's annual return available for public inspection without charge for three years after the due date of the return. You are also required to make available for public inspection a copy of your organization's exemption applicatiori, any supporting documents and the exemption letter to any individual who requests such documents in person or in writing. You can charge only a reasonable fee for reproduction and actual postage costs for the copied materials. The law does not require you to provide copies of public inspection documents that are widely available, such as by posting them on the Internet (World Wide Web). You may be liable for a penalty of $20 a day for each day you do not make these documents available for public inspection (up to a maximum of $10,000 in the case of an annual return). Because this letter could help resolve any questions about your organization's exempt status and foundation status, you should keep it with the organization's permanent records. If you have any questions, please call us at the telephone number shown in the heading of this letter. This letter affirms your organization's exempt status, Sincerely, C. Ashley Bullard District Director City Council Agenda: 11/26/2018 2E. Consideration to approve an application for a temvorary charitable gambling permit for a raffle to be conducted by the Wright Countv Pheasants Forever at River Citv Extreme, 3875 School Blvd. in conjunction with their Annual Membership Banquet (JS) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The Wright County Pheasants Forever has applied for a temporary charitable gambling permit for a raffle to be held on Saturday, April 6, 2019 in conjunction with their 32nd Annual Membership Banquet. The event is being held at River City Extreme with Dinner and Banquet Events being held at 7 p.m. To receive a permit from the State, the City must approve the application. In the past the City has not opposed these exempt gambling license applications for charitable events. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the application for a charitable gambling permit for a raffle conducted by the Wright County Pheasants Forever Chapter #95 on April 6, 2019, for their annual membership banquet at River City Extreme, 3875 School Blvd. 2. Motion to not approve the application for a charitable gambling permit. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff supports Alternative #1 and requests Council to approve the application which will be submitted to the State Gambling Control Board. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • Copy of Application for Exempt Gambling Permit MINNESOTA LAWFUL GAMBLING 11/17 LG220 Application for Exempt Permit Page 1 of 2 An exempt permit may be issued to a nonprofit Application Fee (non-refundable) organization that: conducts lawful gambling on five or fewer days, and Applications are processed in the order received. If the application awards less than $50,000 in prizes during a calendar is postmarked or received 30 days or more before the event, the application fee is $100; otherwise the fee is $150. year. If total raffle prize value for the calendar year will be Due to the high volume of exempt applications, payment of $1,500 or less, contact the Licensing Specialist assigned to additional fees prior to 30 days before your event will not expedite your county by calling 651-539-1900. service, nor are telephone requests for expedited service accepted. ORGANIZATION INFORMATION Organization, �- Previous Gambling Name: LSV/' _L, 4 f A6 �Cvc,, f_ rt, VIP Permit Number: or j on_ Minnesota Tax ID1913-� �/� y� Federal Employer ID Number, if any: Number (FEIN), if any: /� Mailing Address: U� ��>x, 21 City: ��,' � I*vPM State: / 'l Zip: S County: IV.rli�2 11 Name of Chief Executive Officer (CEO): CEO Daytime Phone:76` L����/ CEO Email: /4MY_107!5'7—$90r✓�-i r?_ Cir (✓ // (permit will be emailed to this email address unless otherwise indicated below) Email permit to (if other than the CEO): QcG s�/J� d/ /niv.£%n i / P!/P rcf NONPROFIT STATUS Type of Nonprofit Organization (check one): = Fraternal = Religious Veterans Other Nonprofit Organization Attach a copy of one of the following showing proof of nonprofit status: (DO NOT attach a sales tax exempt status or federal employer ID number, as they are not proof of nonprofit status.) ❑ A current calendar year Certificate of Good Standing Don't have a copy? Obtain this certificate from: MN Secretary of State, Business Services Division Secretary of State website, phone numbers: 60 Empire Drive, Suite 100 www.sos.state.mn.us St. Paul, MN 55103 651-296-2803, or toll free 1-877-551-6767 ❑ IRS income tax exemption (501(c)) letter in your organization's name Don't have a copy? To obtain a copy of your federal income tax exempt letter, have an organization officer contact the IRS toll free at 1-877-829-5500. IRS - Affiliate of national, statewide, or international parent nonprofit organization (charter) If your organization falls under a parent organization, attach copies of both of the following: 1. IRS letter showing your parent organization is a nonprofit 501(c) organization with a group ruling; and 2. the charter or letter from your parent organization recognizing your organization as a subordinate. GAMBLING PREMISES INFORMATION Name of premises where the gambling event will be conducted / (for raffles, list the site where the drawing will take place): Physical Address (do not use P.O. box): ?2 Z!r _I [ rz _ I`AOof Check one: l% / City: Alo•� � e/Zip: S�?61?- County: `VI*"'"� ❑ Township: Zip: County: Date(s) of activity (for raffles, indicate the date of the drawing): April 6, 2019 Check each type of gambling activity that your organization will conduct: Bingo E-1 Paddlewheels a Pull -Tabs =Tipboards �RlRaffle Gambling equipment for bingo paper, bingo boards, raffle boards, paddlewheels, pull -tabs, and tipboards must be obtained from a distributor licensed by the Minnesota Gambling Control Board. EXCEPTION: Bingo hard cards and bingo ball selection devices may be borrowed from another organization authorized to conduct bingo. To find a licensed distributor, go to www.mn.gov/gcb and click on Distributors under the List of Licensees tab, or call 651-539-1900. LG220 Application for Exempt Permit 11/17 Page 2 of 2 LOCAL UNIT OF GOVERNMENT ACKNOWLEDGMENT (required before submitting application to the Minnesota Gambling Control Board) CITY APPROVAL for a gambling premises located within city limits The application is acknowledged with no waiting period. The application is acknowledged with a 30 -day waiting period, and allows the Board to issue a permit after 30 days (60 days for a 1st class city). The application is denied. Print City Name: Signature of City Personnel: Title: Date: The city or county must sign before submitting application to the Gambling Control Board. COUNTY APPROVAL for a gambling premises located in a township he application is acknowledged with no waiting period. he application is acknowledged with a 30 -day waiting period, and allows the Board to issue a permit after 30 days. Elhe application is denied. Print County Name: Signature of County Personnel: Title: Date: TOWNSHIP (if required by the county) On behalf of the township, I acknowledge that the organization is applying for exempted gambling activity within the township limits. (A township has no statutory authority to approve or deny an application, per Minn. Statutes, section 349.213.) Print Township Name: Signature of Township Officer: Title: Date: CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFF'ICER'S SIGNATURE (required) The information provided in this application is complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge report will be completed and returned to the 7 rd wit in 3 ays ipf the event date. Chief Executive Officer's Signature: (Signa m sC be CE 's signature; designee may no sign) Print Name: REQUIREMENTS _I I acknowledge that the financial Date: lo / — �K MAIL APPLICATION AND ATTACHMENTS Complete a separate application for: Mail application with: all gambling conducted on two or more consecutive days; or a copy of your proof of nonprofit status; and • all gambling conducted on one day. application fee (non-refundable). If the application is Only one application is required if one or more raffle drawings are postmarked or received 30 days or more before the event, conducted on the same day. the application fee is $100; otherwise the fee is $150. Financial report to be Completed within 30 days after the Make check payable to State of Minnesota. gambling activity is done: To: Minnesota Gambling Control Board A financial report form will be mailed with your permit. Complete 1711 West County Road B, Suite 300 South and return the financial report form to the Gambling Control Roseville, MN 55113 Board. Questions? Your organization must keep all exempt records and reports for Call the Licensing Section of the Gambling Control Board at 3-1/2 years (Minn. Statutes, section 349.166, subd. 2(f)). 651-539-1900. Data privacy notice: The information requested on this form (and any attachments) will be used by the Gambling Control Board (Board) to determine your organization's qualifications to be involved in lawful gambling activities in Minnesota. Your organization has the right to refuse to supply the information; however, if your organization refuses to supply this information, the Board may not be able to determine your organization's qualifications and, as a consequence, may refuse to issue a permit. If your organization supplies the information requested, the Board will be able to process the application. Your organization's name and address will he public information when received by the Board. All other information provided will be private data about your organization until the Board issues the permit. When the Board issues the permit, all information provided will become public. If the Board does not issue a permit, all information provided remains private, with the exception of your organization's name and address which will remain public. Private data about your organization are available to Board members, Board staff whose work requires access to the information; Minnesota's Depart- ment of Public Safety; Attorney General; Commissioners of Administration, Minnesota Management & Budget, and Revenue; Legislative Auditor, national and international gambling regulatory agencies; anyone pursuant to court order; other individuals and agencies specifically authorized by state or federal law to have access to the information; individuals and agencies for which law or legal order authorizes a new use or sharing of information after this notice was given; and anyone with your written consent. This form will be made available in alternative format (i.e. large print, braille) upon request. An equal opportunity employer City Council Agenda: 11/26/2018 2F. Consideration of approving a Special Event Permit for outdoor entertainment at River Citv Extreme on Julv 12, 2018. Applicant: River Citv Extreme (JS) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The City has received a Special Event permit application from River City Extreme for live entertainment activities after 10 p.m. The event has the potential to impact city's regulations pertaining to noise and, therefore, requires City Council approval. 3-19-2: (D) Special events shall not operate before 7 a.m. or after 10 p.m. unless a Special Event Permit (or other) for such activity has been approved by the City Council. Such permit supersedes the provisions of City Code 6-1-10(B). In this case, River City Extreme has applied for a Special Event permit for Saturday, July 12, 2019. Their outdoor events are proposed to take place until 11:30 p.m. and includes live music. As described by the applicant in their site plan and narrative, it is their intent to have the activity occur in south end of their building facing away from the neighborhood. The city's ordinance for restaurant/bar outdoor requires that outdoor operations cease after 10 p.m. unless exempted through special event permit. The ordinance further requires that noise and music shall not be generated after 9 p.m. for outdoor sales/seating areas adjacent to residential. Staff is interpreting the ordinance such that the preceding clause for exemption through special event permit also applies for noise and music generation. With the exception of special event permits, regular outdoor activities at River City Extreme shall be per the previously approved CUP for the outdoor seating/activity area. The Wright County Sheriff's Office received a copy of the permit application for review and noted that few legitimate complaints were received in the past. Al. Budget Impact: None. A2. Staff Workload Impact: Minimal staff time was necessary to review the request and prepare this report. No additional staff time is anticipated for this request. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the Special Event Permit for outdoor entertainment at River City Extreme for Saturday, July 12, 2019, as described in the application materials, including exemption from the noise ordinance and notification to the adjacent neighborhood. 2. Motion to deny. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends Alternative #I above. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Application and Event Info/Map B. Certificate of Liability Coverage CITY OF MONTICELLO ---�� Community Development 505 Walnut Street, Suite I Special Event Permit N'-Ionficello Monticello. MN 55362 , (763) 295-2711 . infolalci.monticel10.mn.us Application Checklist 0.O - - • - PROPERTY INFORMATION Property Address -3;F7,5- S Awl 9ilool P"W16 , -P%/ ,x-342 Property Legal Description Property ID Number Owner Name Owner Address Owner Phone Owner Email Applicant Name Applicant Address Applicant Phone Applicant Email Name of Event Location/Address of Event Dates & Times of Event PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION =- M --j CANT INF0RIwAI IrV JaA., iiJS 3 r -7s- S"I d4./ 441 A(4*1W 55 ,42 j lj� 3e7<- l4 7//%//9 6R^ - 11:30Ren //=3vfi✓► Complete Application Required The review and consideration of an application submitted shall only occur if such application includes all items that are required in support of the application and is deemed complete by the City Clerk's Office. Application Submission Schedule Application, required information, and payment must be submitted no later than 30 working days prior to desired approval date. Application Information Applicants shall note that in addition to a special event permits, any liquor license or permit, sign permits and building permits for tents may also be required and are not included within the special event permit application and approval. Any requested use of City facilities, City staff resources, City equipment, and/or City property (including rights of way) and/or any requested waiver of application fee or park rental fees requires review and approval by the City Council. In addition, events which occur after 10 PM may requires review and approval by the City Council as related to noise ordinances. Please provide clear information in the application regarding these requests. 04/07/17 Duration of Permit A temporary use permit for a special event authorized in accordance with this subsection shall be limited to a maximum duration of 14 days per site per calendar year, unless otherwise specifically authorized by the City Clerk. Property Owner's Statement I am the fee title owner of the described property and I agree to this application. I certify that I am in compliance with all ordinance requirements and conditions regarding other City approval that have been previously granted. (Signature) (Date) ` t Applicant's Statement This application shall be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding the application. 1 have completed all of the applicable filing requirements and I hereby acknowledge that I have read and fully understand the applicable provisions of the City Ordinances and current policies related to this application and that the documents and information I have submitted are true and correct. (Signature) CITY APPROVAL (City Clerk Signature) (Community Development Director Signature) Special Event Permit Approval is granted with the following conditions: Internal review checklist (as applicable): Public Works Routing Law Enforcement Notification Building Department (Tents) Monticello Community Center Room/Park Reservations Post -Approval Routing/Requirements Applicant Public Works Law Enforcement Notification City Clerk Monticello Community Center Room/Park Reservations Liability Insurance Certificate Received Surrounding Property Owner Notification Complete (Date) (Date) (Date) Approved ❑ Denied ❑ Admin I Parks I Streets Director 04/07/17 4 Concert Friday 7/12/19 1. The event is an outdoor concert at River City Extreme. It will be held in the former volleyball area. 7/12/19 from 6PM-11:30PM, Music from 7PM-11:30PM. Portable stage will be set up near the building facing away from the neighborhood, 2. None 3. There is no request for any city resources Jul 4k, lot. ACS �0 CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE DATE(MM;DD,-YYY1� 1/10/2018 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder In lieu of such endorsement(s). PRODUCER CONTACT Y NAME: Mar Banfield Corporate 4 Insurance Agency Inc. PHONE (952)893-9218 I FAX (952)843-9402 (AC.o, NExt1: (A -C, No): 7220 Metro Boulevard E-MAIL ESS:mbanfield@corporatefour.com DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS 1 LOCATIONS / VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached if more space is required) Premises at 3875 School Blvd., Monticello, MN including adjacent fenced outdoor patio and volleyball court. CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE City of Monticello THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN 505 Walnut St. 41 ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. Monticello, MN 55362 AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE Glenn Carlson/MARYB ©1988-2014 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. ACORD 25 (2014/01) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD INS025 rsnlann INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE MAIC A Edina MN 55439-2133 INSURERA:Cincinnati Insurance Co. INSURED INSURERB:Illinois Casualty River City Extreme Inc. INSURER C: 563 Bielenberg Drive, #115 INSURER D: INSURER E: Iloodbury 14N 55125 INSURER F: COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER:17 /18 GL & Liquor REVISION NUMBER: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. INSR TYPE OF INSURANCE ADDL SUBR LTR (NSD WVD POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFF POLICY EXP LIMITS (MMIDDAY(MM/DD/YYYY) YY) X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE 5 1,000 000 [i] 1 DAMAGERENTED A CLAIMS -MADE OCCUR I PREMISESS ( (Ea occurrence) S 500, 000 EPP0262849 7/1/2017 7/1/2018 I MED EXP (Any one person) $ excluded _ I PERSONAL 8 ADV INJURY S 1,000,000 GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: I GENERAL AGGREGATE $ 2,000,000 POLICY F� PRO E LOC I f 2,000,000 JECT PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG S OTHER S AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT S (Ea accident) ANY AUTO ( BODILY INJURY (Per person) $ ALL OWNED SCHEDULED AUTOS AUTOS I BODILY INJURY (Per accident)+ S NON OWNED PROPERTY DAMAGE $ HIRED AUTOS AUTOS —` (Per accident) S UMBRELLA LIAR OCCUR EACH OCCURRENCE $ EXCESS LIAB rI CLAIMS -MADE I AGGREGATE S I I DED RETENTIONS S WORKERS COMPENSATIONI TATUTE I J ORH AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY Y / N SPR ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE E.L. EACH ACCIDENT $ OFFICERJMEMBER EXCLUDED? N / A (Mandatory in NH) - E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYE S If yes, describe under DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT S B Liquor Liability LL98545 7/1/2017 7/1/2018 1.000,000 ea. common cause DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS 1 LOCATIONS / VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached if more space is required) Premises at 3875 School Blvd., Monticello, MN including adjacent fenced outdoor patio and volleyball court. CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE City of Monticello THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN 505 Walnut St. 41 ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. Monticello, MN 55362 AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE Glenn Carlson/MARYB ©1988-2014 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. ACORD 25 (2014/01) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD INS025 rsnlann City Council Agenda: 11/26/2018 2G. Consideration of renewing a pawn broker license for 2019 for David Corbin dba Monticello Pawn, Gun and Bargain Center at 1219 South Highwav 25 (JS) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The City first approved a pawn broker license for the business Monticello Pawn, Gun and Bargain Center in 2007. In addition, the City also approved an off-site storage facility at 12081 -165th Street in Becker. The Council is asked to consider a renewal for David Corbin for 2019. Mr. Corbin was granted his initial license in December 2015. We received the renewal application from David Corbin along with the fee. The city code requires verification from the Wright County Sheriff's Department for any issues related to the operation of the business that might impact the renewal of the license. Staff is not aware of any issues in this regard and has sent the application to Sheriff Joe Hagerty for verification and signature. The City will be providing the Monticello Pawn Shop with a physical license after the renewal is approved by Council and the application is signed by the Sheriff. The license should be displayed at the shop in a visible location as is recommended under state law. Al. Budget Impact: None A2. Staff Workload Impact: Minimal impact with preparation of the application and license. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the application for a 2019 pawn broker license for David Corbin dba as Monticello Pawn, Gun and Bargain Center located at 1219 TH 25, contingent on the application returned from the Sheriff's Department with no adverse findings. 2. Motion to not approve a 2019 pawn broker license for Monticello Pawn, Gun and Bargain Center at this time. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative #1 to approve the application of the license for David Corbin of Monticello Pawn, Gun and Bargain Center at 1219 TH 25 for the year 2019 pending a favorable review from the Wright County Sheriff's Office. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Copy of Pawn Broker Application/License — David Corbin B. City Code Title III, Chapter 15 - Pawn Shops CITY ()f mcntkdo City of Monticello PAWN BROKER'S APPLICATION/LICENSE Business Name: DT SALES Inc / DBA Monticello Pawn & Gun Business Address: 1219 Hwy 25 South Mailing/Billi-ig Address: Business Email:---dDavenu,dkmaps.com Applicant Name: _David min Home Address: Coon id.s _MN 55448 Please check the appropriate box: Renewal X , Monticello MN Phone: -763-295-6955 Phone:— New Application ❑ Please check all trade items that apply to your pawn shop business: Guns X Gold/Coins X Other X If you checked "Guns", please enclose a copy of your Federal License for an authorized firearms dealer with this application. Worker's Coonvensation: Minnesota Statutes 176.182 requires acceptable evidence of compliance vrith the Workers' Compensation insurance program. Please enclose an insurance certificate for your business showing that you have Work Comp insurance for the period of this license application (Jan I - December 3l ). In lieu of a certificate, you can list the following: Name of Insurance Company: RTW Inc Policy Numb:r: MNAR-000042276-1 Dates of coverage: 8/23/18 to 8/22/19 If you have n3 employees and are not required to carry Work Comp insurance, check here. ❑ VERIFICATION BY APPLICANT: I agree to abide by federal, state and local laws, ordinances and regulations pertaining to pawn shops and thia license. 1 further agree to provide the Wright County Sheriff's Department, provider of law enforcement services for the City of Monticello, with all records as required under city ordinance and state law. 1 further agree to participate in the electronic pawn record system utilized by the City 9, Ivgticello and Wright County Sheriff's Department. Signature: Date: 11-14-18 Print Name: David Corbin Title: President. 1.4'U" Q/ 1't! irf�at ltii.T LX%A;&9 4 .S. �N[�l!'1lnllfi of ,it#StiCe invau o{AhMWr Tobacco, 1'1 MS and Explovives (1 S V. r.7�r . C C78apter 44) iu iwrs uawaMll��alaw attar arae Wkh t 047i& 1, OM &WOI XQt of 149. wid Ilse ncguta im issued thes+at►tader t7 CER d 478 , Iciness s in this I' wid>m the limitations of Cha � �, 'ntic I Code, � ? !'°u are acrd to engage in the p pt 8�w, . and the ne�tiitNiott: issued thrrt�aundes_ ctntit the expiretiatt date mm. IRIS 11CRiU4 I s '�C3S" snd'NOTICES" on tmmse. 4cdAIF ATF *CW4 FFLC xmnderwe To 244 4cwhoRoad ,,�; i,;�•��''`�,: �•r�� � � -171-02-9C-04983 a04a. vcL Federal F1f0 1.1Q* �. en � f ! ��.,d'�. r'[ Z `i_: a� �•EX�'i z �w' _ , rz lift MONTICELLO FA 8r CSU - r ,1= x A. frcmisas Andress (? e 19 HIGHWAY i 12 H Y Z6 . MONMELLO. UN 11 WA PC ofLiman MEN 01-PAWN2ROKER ie lirwm* awned above ami tmtm to vw* the man* as Cl -'R Put i y8. maAkaw ad. .meed or *-aaa-led cop) 1gi ul sigparum is awApabkt musee (FFL) or a raspovmWe a lk=m iumd to the rove vpe of L " )TLC of mw changesa fps "WZ oft!• rl- . ,•`" f I . i. - 1 4, the Rise hapbe W i. fid r• ir�dnattt:eml�bor r'a Marv-rl±r_�-kiNd< GUN MW of the FFL. ;.sett 'tau t' rad sbuft to f ago rn t aj i Y/� ,/iV. r•1 '3 _ 7.!'7d _z ire{_ :� , Yw i .::«?P{ i�k�/ 'l"�2- e. '4�.r3 Kai,,+-'•�- L 1 Pout" Prirnfxl NOW Data AIT NOR i (331<._1 u _YmK jhum 1j Cbwiku Mw*amMNa*il�Ti/ rt.tM•� �1lnf�tOM11tiM.MwlluorRlow - Ji.n•,wJ OaJbrr _Ji 1 f ederaal Ar*arms Ucons- (1: FF14 C asko"r Serfice WoCniation :decd Rrt*fms 1. Uftfii]V G.+Ibn-(FFW) Ttsii.fine irei rfaaev. ntber: (W) 662.2750 ATI" Hcuneputt, .vww,>Rtf Im M Needy Rnud Toll-fFCc Fax Nwnbcr: (11")237-21149 FFL eZ Clwa wv►+L tatfanlitst. govagetttr�i: :ortin=bars WV 2340S -''A431 6 -mail- NLC@Wt80W urge a(Addrm 127 CFR 4%.32j- i..iGuiaoes may donut the tenn oftbeir ewrow lioftu* umove their business or scrn*• to a acw location at .vhw) the+ iAmd lttlerr>y' to eaty an guflll bats a or "Mm by t6r� ae A . t for an Atucaded Fadetal Fireatma T.ioe+rsG ATF Fond 530038o m detpiieatc. at* Its: than 30 dais i0[ to such removal with tha � F dwW Fit+estmrs L-k4msiu$ Canter. The applicatim must be mvitad under ft Pwatties of perjury Asad Pe"lt[as impond tLv 18 M924. The app1iC01w ba ar ouwu6ed b�• the hmucc's ori0ad hoose. TW bftm will be vee for 1:116 remainder of tt term of tLc ori3611e l license. (Tltt 94 FFLC, shad. it the is sot gaA>Oiied, refer die app&%fi n for mem24ed Ikmw to Alt Dit'rmr of buhatrT Opwisdiorts ter deaW its tivewiAsat e ea 4 4n7t.) igltr of $noaaien (27 CPR #78.5Q. (a) Gertsin Pemns otiK.r titian ft iicaraee mler 38CM tbt rWtt to cry oar the sam.Ora&= or anunuaidon busiucv; at tate ime address sham oar sad the remainder fsrFtlif: trnr a( a cunuat licca• Such persons am ()) The sur Avimq spot"a for ohiK ca evocertor_ admini"tor, m otim pl rcpne9MAtive eta deoe d kamsm and (2) A iewiwer or trusty in baiL-rul+tey, or an assignoo for bent& of enArms. (b) In order to pro the right "idol b► is swkm. the Parcae or peal x vor+tmu4m the busious :lull tumish the Hearse for tbm bn mss for mdommew orwad, succmikv to the L'4 FFL C: %ithin 30 iys [roan the date an which ft swAassct begins to carry -on the bountu. nterc}C_____ Federal Firearvell°Licam (F'!?L) Inform" a card ' LicCim Naim: dT SALO$ WC t BusiineaNanx: MONTI License Numbct: 3-41 -1 .Q' ,ticem Tvpe 02.PAW� ,ARMS OTHER IMAN t DE8 "�• t Erpirdion: all.r�t:h 1., 2019 t r t Piaw Nato: Nat Valid for OW (flak cr Odw Dupwitien of F- Irises, .a (C'Dnrinjred 4m rvv* m sidsi FFL Nmyslctter - Electraaie tiet'ILW AviflablS Sip -Up Today! i`1•'i.s intfrested m rwAi tiN tht e1wrgoic vrrsiarl o; the FFL NmvW- ter, along with ow -moral additimal infarmation. shuctld sabiuit name, FFLntimbar, and e-mail address to: FIPJ3tA*tf gcA-. Tho elwamic FFL Ne%vsletitr will atabie ATF to commUnicatt 6fonwWon to tics ext en a periodic basis. sr•+. CHAPTER 15 PAWN SHOPS SECTION: 3-15-1 Purpose 3-15-2 Definitions 3-15-3 License Required 3-15-4 Application Required 3-15-5 License Fees 3-15-6 Bond Required 3-15-7 Persons Ineligible for License 3-15-8 Records Required 3-15-9 Application Execution 3-15-10 Daily Reports to Police 3-15-11 Receipt Required 3-15-12 Redemption Period 3-15-13 Holding Period 3-15-14 Police Order to Hold Property 3-15-15 Inspection of Items 3-15-16 Label Required 3-15-17 Prohibited Acts 3-15-18 Denial, Suspension or Revocation 3-15-19 Business at Only One Place 3-15-20 Separability 3-15-1: PURPOSE. The city council finds that use of services provided by pawnbrokers provides an opportunity for the commission of crimes and their concealment because pawn businesses have the ability to receive and transfer property stolen by others easily and quickly. The city council also finds that consumer protection regulation is warranted in transactions involving pawnbrokers. The city council further finds that the pawn industry has outgrown the city's current ability to effectively or efficiently identify criminal activity related to pawn shops. The purpose of this chapter is to prevent pawn businesses from being used as facilities for the commission of crimes, and to assure that such businesses comply with basic consumer protection standards, thereby protecting the public health, safety, and general welfare of the citizens of the city. To help local law enforcement better regulate current and future pawn businesses, decrease and stabilize costs associated with the regulation of the pawn industry, and increase identification of criminal activities in the pawn industry through the timely collection and sharing of pawn transaction information, this chapter also implements and establishes the required use of the Automated Pawn System (APS). 3-15-2: DEFINITIONS. When used in this article, the following words shall mean: MONTICELLO CITY ORDINANCE TITLE III / Chapter 15 / Page 1 Pawnbroker. A person, partnership or corporation, who lends money on the security of pledged goods (items that are "left in pawn"), and/or purchases goods on the condition that they may be redeemed or repurchased by the seller for a fixed price, within a fixed period of time. To the extent that a pawnbroker' s business includes buying personal property previously used, rented or leased, or selling it on consignment, the provisions of this chapter shall be applicable. (#542, 1/9/12) Reportable transaction. Every transaction conducted by a pawnbroker in which merchandise is received through a pawn, purchase, consignment or trade, or in which a pawn is renewed, extended or redeemed, or for which a unique transaction number or identifier is generated by their point-of-sale software, is reportable except: (1) The bulk purchase or consignment of new or used merchandise from a merchant, manufacturer or wholesaler having an established permanent place of business, and the retail sale of said merchandise, provided the pawnbroker must maintain a record of such purchase or consignment which describes each item, and must mark each item in a manner which relates it to that transaction record. (2) Retail and wholesale sales of merchandise originally received by pawn or purchase, and for which all applicable hold and/or redemption periods have expired. Billable transaction. Every reportable transaction conducted by a pawnbroker except renewals, redemptions or extensions of existing pawns on items previously reported and continuously in the licensee's possession is a billable transaction. 3-15-3: LICENSE REQUIRED. No person shall engage in the business of pawnbroker at any location without a pawnbroker license for that location. No pawnbroker license may be transferred to a different location or a different person. Issuance of a license under this chapter shall not relieve the licensee from obtaining any other licenses required to conduct business at the same or any other location. 3-15-4: APPLICATION REQUIRED. An application form provided by the city clerk must be completed by every applicant for a new license or for renewal of an existing license. Every new applicant must provide all the following information: (1) If the applicant is a sole proprietor: a. The name, place and date of birth, street resident address, and phone number of applicant. b. Whether the applicant is a citizen of the United States or resident alien. MONTICELLO CITY ORDINANCE TITLE III / Chapter 15 / Page 2 Whether the applicant has ever used or has been known by a name other than the applicant's name, and if so, the name or names used and information concerning dates and places used. d. The name of the business if it is to be conducted under a designation, name, or style other than the name of the applicant and a certified copy of the certificate as required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 333.01. The street address at which the applicant has lived during the preceding five (5) years. f. The type, name and location of every business or occupation in which the applicant has been engaged during the preceding five (5) years and the name(s) and address(es) of the applicant's employer(s) and partner(s), if any, for the preceding five (5) years. g. Whether the applicant has ever been convicted of a felony, crime, or violation of any ordinance other than a traffic ordinance. If so, the applicant must furnish information as to the time, place, and offense of all such convictions. h. If the applicant does not manage the business, the name of the manager(s) or other person(s) in charge of the business and all information concerning each of them required in a. through g. of Subdivision (1) of this section. (2) If the applicant is a partnership: a. The name(s) and address(es) of all general and limited partners and all information concerning each general partner required in subdivision (1) of this section. b. The name(s) of the managing partner(s) and the interest of each partner in the licensed business. A true copy of the partnership agreement shall be submitted with the application. If the partnership is required to file a certificate as to a trade name pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 333.01, a certified copy of such certificate must be attached to the application. (3) If the applicant is a corporation or other organization: a. The name of the corporation or business form, and if incorporated, the State of Incorporation. MONTICELLO CITY ORDINANCE TITLE III / Chapter 15 / Page 3 b. A true copy of the Certificate of Incorporation, Articles of Incorporation or Association Agreement, and By-laws shall be attached to the application. If the applicant is a foreign corporation, a Certificate of Authority as required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 303.06, must be attached. C. The name of the manager(s) or other person(s) in charge of the business and all information concerning each manager, proprietor, or agent required in a. through g. of Subdivision (1) of this section. (4) For all applicants: a. Whether the applicant holds a current pawnbroker, precious metal dealer or secondhand goods dealer license from any other governmental unit. b. Whether the applicant has previously been denied, or had revoked or suspended, a pawnbroker precious metal dealer, or secondhand dealer license from any other governmental unit. The location of the business premises. d. Such other information as the city council or issuing authority may require. 3-15-5: APPLICATION EXECUTION. All applications for a license under this chapter must be signed and sworn to under oath or affirmation by the applicant. If the application is that of a sole proprietor, it must be signed and sworn to by such person; if that of a corporation, by an officer thereof; if that of a partnership, by one of the general partners; and if that of an unincorporated association, by the manager or managing officer thereof. Any falsification on a license application shall result in the denial of a license. 3-15-6: PERSONS INELIGIBLE FOR A LICENSE. No license under this chapter will be issued to an applicant who is a sole proprietor, a partnership if such applicant has any general partner or managing partner, a corporation or other organization if such applicant has any manager, proprietor or agent in charge of the business to be licensed, if the applicant: (1) Is a minor at the time that the application is filed; (2) Has been convicted of any crime directly related to the occupation licensed as prescribed by Minnesota Statutes, Section 364.03, Subd. 2, and has not shown competent evidence of sufficient rehabilitation and present fitness to perform the duties of a licensee under this chapter as prescribed by MONTICELLO CITY ORDINANCE TITLE III / Chapter 15 / Page 4 Minnesota Statutes, Section 364.03, Subd. 3; or (3) Is not of good moral character or repute. 3-15-7: LICENSE FEES. (A) The annual license fees for licenses issued under this chapter shall be as adopted by the City Council. (#357, 11/27/00) (B) The billable transaction license fee shall reflect the cost of processing transactions and other related regulatory expenses as determined by the city council, and shall be reviewed and adjusted, periodically. Licensees shall be notified in writing thirty (30) days before any adjustment is implemented. (#542, 1/9/12) (C) Billable transaction fees shall be billed monthly and are due and payable within thirty (30) days. Failure to do so is a violation of this chapter. 3-15-8: BOND REQUIRED. Before a license will be issued, every applicant must submit a five thousand dollar ($5,000.00) bond on the forms provided by the licensing authority. All bonds must be conditioned that the principal will observe all laws in relation to pawnbrokers, and will conduct business in conformity thereto, and that the principal will account for and deliver to any person legally entitled any goods which have come into the principal's hand through the principal's business as a pawnbroker, or in lieu thereof, will pay the reasonable value in money to the person. The bond shall contain a provision that no bond may be canceled except upon thirty (30) days written notice to the city, which shall be served upon the licensing authority. 3-15-9: RECORDS REQUIRED. At the time of any reportable transaction other than renewals, extensions or redemptions, every licensee must immediately record in English the following information by using ink or other indelible medium on forms or in a computerized record approved by local law enforcement. A complete and accurate description of each item including, but not limited to, any trademark, identification number, serial number, model number, brand name, or other identifying mark on such an item. 2. The purchase price, amount of money loaned upon, or pledged therefore. 3. The maturity date of the transaction and the amount due, including monthly and annual interest rates and all pawn fees and charges. 4. Date, time and place the item of property was received by the licensee, and the unique alpha and/or numeric transaction identifier that distinguishes it from all other transactions in the licensee's records. MONTICELLO CITY ORDINANCE TITLE III / Chapter 15 / Page 5 5. Full name, current residence address, current residence telephone number, date of birth and accurate description of the person from whom the item of property was received, including: sex, height, weight, race, color of eyes and color of hair. 6. The identification number and state of issue from any of the following forms of identification of the seller: a. Current valid Minnesota driver's license. b. Current valid Minnesota identification card. Current valid photo identification card issued by another state or province of Canada. 7. The signature of the person identified in the transaction. 8. Effective sixty (60) days from the date of notification by local law enforcement of acceptable video standards the licensee must also take a color photograph or color video recording of- a. £a. Each customer involved in a billable transaction. b. Every item pawned or sold that does not have an unique serial or identification number permanently engraved or affixed. If a photograph is taken, it must be at least two (2) inches in length by two (2) inches in width and must be maintained in such a manner that the photograph can be readily matched and correlated with all other records of the transaction to which they relate. Such photographs must be available to the chief of police or the chiefs designee, upon request. The major portion of the photograph must include an identifiable front facial close-up of the person who pawned or sold the item. Items photographed must be accurately depicted. The licensee must inform the person that he or she is being photographed by displaying a sign of sufficient size in a conspicuous place in the premises. If a video photograph is taken, the video camera must zoom in on the person pawning or selling the item so as to include an identifiable close-up of that person's face. Items photographed by video must be accurately depicted. Video photographs must be electronically referenced by time and date so they can be readily matched and correlated with all other records of the transaction to which they relate. The licensee must inform the person orally that he or she is being videotaped and by displaying a sign of sufficient size in a conspicuous place on the premises. The licensee must keep the exposed videotape for three (3) months. MONTICELLO CITY ORDINANCE TITLE III / Chapter 15 / Page 6 9. Digitized photographs. Effective sixty (60) days from the date of notification by local law enforcement, licensees must fulfill the color photograph requirements in subdivision (8) by submitting them as digital images, in a format specified by the issuing authority, electronically cross-referenced to the reportable transaction they are associated with. Notwithstanding the digital images may be captured from required video recordings, this provision does not alter or amend the requirements in subdivision (8). 10. Renewals, extensions and redemptions. For renewals, extensions and redemptions, the licensee shall provide the original transaction identifier, the date of the current transaction and the type of transaction. 11. Inspection of records. The records must at all reasonable times be open to inspection by local law enforcement or state regulatory agencies. Data entries shall be retained for at least three (3) years from the date of transaction. Entries of required digital images shall be retained a minimum of ninety (90) days. 3-15-10: DAILY REPORTS TO POLICE. (A) Effective no later than sixty (60) days after local law enforcement provides licensees with computerized record standards, licensees must submit every reportable transaction to local law enforcement daily in the following manner: Licensees must provide to local law enforcement all information required in Section 3-15-9 RECORDS REQUIRED, Subdivision (1) through (6) and other required information by transferring it from their computer to the Automated Pawn System via modem. All required records must be transmitted completely and accurately after the close of business each day in accordance with standards and procedures established by the issuing authority. The licensee must display a sign of sufficient size, in a conspicuous place in the premises, which informs all patrons that all transactions are reported to local law enforcement daily. (B) Billable transactions fees. Licensees will be charged for each billable transaction reported to local law enforcement. 1. If a licensee is unable to successfully transfer the required reports by modem, the licensee must provide local law enforcement printed copies of all reportable transactions along with the video tape(s) for that date by 12:00 the next business day. 2. If the problem is determined to be in the licensee's system and is not corrected by the close of the first business day following the failure, MONTICELLO CITY ORDINANCE TITLE III / Chapter 15 / Page 7 the licensee must provide the required reports as detailed in subdivision (B) (1), and must be charged a fifty dollar ($50.00) reporting failure penalty, daily, until the error is corrected, or: 3. If the problem is determined to be outside the licensee's system, the licensee must provide the required reports in subdivision (B) (1) and resubmit all such transactions via modem when the error is corrected. 4. If a licensee is unable to capture, digitize or transmit the photographs required in Section 3-15-9 RECORDS REQUIRED, Subdivision (9), the licensee must immediately take all required photographs with a still camera, cross-reference the photographs to the correct transaction, and make the pictures available to local law enforcement upon request. 5. Regardless of the cause or origin of the technical problems that prevented the licensee from uploading their reportable transactions, upon correction of the problem, the licensee shall upload every reportable transaction from every business day the problem had existed. 6. Subdivision (B) (1) through (3) notwithstanding, local law enforcement may, upon presentation of extenuating circumstances, delay the implementation of the daily reporting penalty. 3-15-11: RECEIPT REQUIRED. Every licensee must provide a receipt to the party identified in every reportable transaction and must maintain a duplicate of that receipt for three (3) years. The receipt must include at least the following information: 1. The name, address and telephone number of the licensed business. 2. The date and time the item was received by the licensee. 3. Whether the item was pawned or sold or the nature of the transaction. 4. An accurate description of each item received including, but not limited to, any trademark, identification number, serial number, model number, brand name or other identifying mark on such an item. 5. The signature or unique identifier of the licensee or employee that conducted the transaction. 6. The amount advanced or paid. MONTICELLO CITY ORDINANCE TITLE III / Chapter 15 / Page 8 7. The monthly and annual interest rates, including all pawn fees and charges. 8. The last regular day of business by which the item must be redeemed by the pledger without risk that the item will be sold, and the amount necessary to redeem the pawned item on that date. 9. The full name, current residence address, current residence telephone number and date of birth of the pledger or seller. 10. The identification number and state of issue from any of the following forms of identification of the seller: a. Current valid Minnesota driver's license. b. Current valid Minnesota identification card. Current valid photo driver's license or identification card issued by another state or province of Canada. 11. Description of the pledger or seller including sex, approximate height, weight, race, color of eyes and color of hair. 12. The signature of the pledger or seller. 13. All printed statements as required by state statute 325J.04 subdivision 2, or any other applicable statutes. 3-15-12: REDEMPTION PERIOD. (A) Any person pledging, pawning or depositing an item for security must have a minimum of sixty (60) days from the date of that transaction to redeem the item before it may be forfeited and sold. During the holding period, items may not be removed from the licensed location except as provided in Section 3-15-19 BUSINESS AT ONLY ONE PLACE. Licensees are prohibited from redeeming any item to anyone other than the person to whom the receipt was issued or, to any person identified in a written and notarized authorization to redeem the property identified in the receipt, or to a person identified in writing by the pledger at the time of the initial transaction and signed by the pledger, or with approval of the police license inspector. Written authorization for release of property to persons other than original pledger must be maintained along with original transaction record in accordance with Section 3-15-9 RECORDS REQUIRED, Subdivision (10). (B) Pawnbroker must return goods, or provide compensation for lost or damaged goods, upon payment of the full amount due, unless: MONTICELLO CITY ORDINANCE TITLE III / Chapter 15 / Page 9 The 60 -day redemption period has expired, or 2. The goods have been taken into custody by a court or by a law enforcement officer or agency. (#542, 1/9/12) 3-15-13: HOLDING PERIOD ON TRADE ITEMS. Any item purchased or accepted in trade by a licensee, but not involved in a pawn transaction, must not be sold or otherwise transferred for thirty-one (3 1) days from the date of the transaction. An individual may redeem an item at any time during the holding period. (#542, 1/9/12) 3-15-14: COURT OR POLICE ORDER TO HOLD/CONFISCATE PROPERTY. Whenever a law enforcement official from any agency notifies a licensee not to sell an item, the item must not be sold or removed from the premises. This initial or investigative hold shall be confirmed in writing within seventy-two hours and remains in effect for fifteen (15) days from the date of initial notification. Local law enforcement may, in writing, extend an investigative hold or independently order an item held for up to ninety (90) days, or order the confiscation of an item identified as stole or evidence in a criminal case. (#542, 1/9/12) 3-15-15: INSPECTION OF ITEMS. At all times during the terms of the license, the licensee must allow law enforcement officials to enter the premises where the licensed business is located, including all off-site storage facilities as authorized in Section 3-15-19 BUSINESS AT ONLY ONE PLACE, during normal business hours, except in an emergency for the purpose of inspecting such premises and inspecting the items, ware and merchandise and records therein to verify compliance with this chapter and other applicable laws. 3-15-16: LABEL REQUIRED. Licensee must attach a label to every item at the time it is pawned, purchased or received in inventory from any reportable transaction. Permanently recorded on this label must be the number or name that identifies the transaction in the shop's records, the transaction date, the name of the item and the description or the model and serial number of the item as reported to local law enforcement whichever is applicable and the date the item is out of pawn or can be sold, if applicable. Labels shall not be re -used. 3-15-17: PROHIBITED ACTS. (A) No person under the age of eighteen (18) years may pawn or sell or attempt to pawn or sell goods with any licensee, nor may any licensee receive any goods from a person under the age of eighteen (18) years. (B) No licensee may receive any goods from a person of unsound mind or an MONTICELLO CITY ORDINANCE TITLE III / Chapter 15 / Page 10 intoxicated person. (C) No licensee may receive any goods, unless the seller presents identification in the form of a valid driver's license, a valid State of Minnesota identification card, or current valid photo driver's license or identification card issued by the state of residency of the person from whom the item was received. (D) No licensee may receive any item of property that possesses an altered or obliterated serial number or operation identification number or any item of property that has had its serial number removed. (E) No person may pawn, pledge, sell, consign, leave, or deposit any article of property not their own; nor shall any person pawn, pledge, sell, consign, leave, or deposit the property of another, whether with permission or without; nor shall any person pawn, pledge, sell, consign, leave, or deposit any article of property in which another person has a security interest; with any licensee. (F) No person seeking to pawn, pledge, sell, consign, leave, or deposit any article of property with any licensee shall give a false or fictitious name, nor give a false date of birth; nor give a false or out of date address of residence or telephone number; nor present a false or altered identification, or the identification of another; to any licensee. 3-15-18: DENIAL, SUSPENSION OR REVOCATION. Any license under this chapter may be denied, suspended or revoked for one or more of the following reasons: 1. The proposed use does not comply with any applicable zoning code. 2. The proposed use does not comply with any health, building, building maintenance or other provisions of this Code of Ordinances or state law. 3. The applicant or licensee has failed to comply with one or more provisions of this chapter. 4. The applicant is not a citizen of the United States or a resident alien, or upon whom it is impractical or impossible to conduct a background or financial investigation due to the unavailability of information. 5. Fraud, misrepresentation or bribery in securing or renewing a license. 6. Fraud, misrepresentation or false statements made in the application and investigation for, or in the course of, the applicant's business. 7. Violation within the preceding five (5) years, of any law relating to theft, MONTICELLO CITY ORDINANCE TITLE III / Chapter 15 / Page 11 damage or trespass to property, sale of a controlled substance, or operation of a business. 8. The owner of the premises licensed or to be licensed would not qualify for a license under the terms of this chapter. 3-15-19: BUSINESS AT ONLY ONE PLACE. A license under this chapter authorizes the licensee to carry on its business only at the permanent place of business designated in the license. However, upon written request, the police inspector may approve an off-site locked and secured storage facility. The licensee shall permit inspection of the facility in accordance with Section 3-15-15 INSPECTION OF ITEMS. All provisions of this chapter regarding record keeping and reporting apply to the facility and its contents. Property shall be stored in compliance with all provisions of the city code. The licensee must either own the building in which the business is conducted, and any approved off-site storage facility, or have a lease on the business premise that extends for more than six (6) months. 3-15-20: SEPARABILITY. Should any section, subsection, clause or other provision of this chapter be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the ordinance as a whole or any part other than the part so declared invalid. (#356, 10/10/00) (#542, 1/9/12) MONTICELLO CITY ORDINANCE TITLE III / Chapter 15 / Page 12 Council Agenda: 11/26/2018 2H. Consideration of approving a contract with the Wright Countv Assessor's Office for 2020-2021 assessing services (WO) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The city currently contracts with the Wright County Assessor's Office to perform assessing work for the city. Attached is a proposed contract covering services for the 2020 and 2021 property tax values. As a point of reference, the assessor is currently working on the 2019 property tax values, which are used for 2020 tax collections. The first payment on the new agreement is in June 2020. Under the proposed agreement, the city would pay $13/parcel in 2020 (2017 = $10.50; 2018 = $11.50; 2019 = $12.00) and $14/parcel 2021 for assessment services. New construction for all property types with an estimated construction value of $499,999 or less will be charged at $50/parcel (currently $50); all property types $500,000 and greater will be charged at $150/parcel (currently $150). The 2018-2019 contract marked the beginning of county charges for exempt, mobile home and personal property. This change added about 756 parcels to the total count. These properties are charged at the same rates listed above. The proposed contract keeps these charges. The other options for the city would be: to try and negotiate a more favorable contract with Wright County, contract this service out with a private assessor or company, or to hire a city assessor as a city employee. Al. Budget Impact: Using the 2018 parcel count, the city will pay $5,361 more in 2020 and an additional $5,361 (total $10,722) in 2021. The city paid $65,201.50 in 2018. The 2019 estimate using the same parcel count is $67,882. By contrast, St. Michael is budgeting $89,308 in 2019 for its in-house assessor. The county has given the city ample time to plan ahead for the proposed increase. A2. Staff Impact: There is no staff impact if this contract is approved as presented and signed by the county. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve a contract for assessing services with the Wright County Assessor for 2020 and 2021 services at the rates as proposed. 2. Motion to not approve a contract at this time. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative #1. The city has contracted with Wright County for a number of years and prior year rates were unchanged for at least six years prior to the 2018 and 2019 increases. The city's working relationship with the County Assessor's Office is excellent. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Proposed Wright County Assessment Services Contract & Letter B. Assessor Contract Schedules v JNz Y or �. WRIGHT COUNTY ASSESSOR'S OFFICE r, Memo To: City Administrators and Township Supervisors From: Tony Rasmuson, SAMA, Wright County Assessor Date: 11/1/2018 RE: 2020 and 2021 Assessment Contracts In October of 2018, the County Board reviewed the costs associated with performing the assessment and the revenue received by the jurisdictions that employ me services of the Wright County Assessor's Office. Findings by the Board included: • The current deficit for the Assessor's Office is in excess of one million dollars. • Our office will be replacing Xerox software that is antiquated and will no longer be supported by the company that is providing it to us — cost to the County to replace is in excess of $125,000. • Local assessors have been retiring, districts that were under contract with local assessors haven't been able to find replacements, requiring the County hire and pay to have assessors trained and licensed to perform the assessment for those districts. • Legislation has made it so all assessor's will have to be accredited within four years of hire, resulting in higher up front expenses for training. There are also increased requirements for continuing education for existing assessors required by legislation. Items ratified by the County Board (changes to the previous contract): To more equitably share costs, our office will be adjusting our rate for the 2020 assessment from $12 to $13 per parcel and the 2021 assessment to $14 per parcel. Keep this in mind as you budget for 2020 and 2021. All other charges will remain the same throughout the term of the contract. We appreciate the relationships that we have with all districts that we work with and I want to personally thank you for choosing the Wright County Assessor's Office for your assessment needs. We will continue to work hard and remember that we are here for you! Please find the enclosed contract; sign, date and mail the contract back to our office before January 2, 2019. WRIGHT COUNTY ASSESSOR'S OFFICE Wright County Government Center • 10 Second Street NW Room 100 • Buffalo, MN 55313 MAIN: 763/682-7367 • FAx:763/684-4553 www.co.wright.mn.us ASSESSMENT SERVICES AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into by and between the County of Wright, a political subdivision of the State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as the "County" and the City of Monticello a political subdivision of the State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as "City/Township"; WHEREAS, said City/Township lies either wholly or partially within the County and constitutes a separate assessment district; and WHEREAS, under such circumstances the provision of the Minnesota Statutes, Sections 273.072 and 471.59 permit the County Assessor to provide for the assessment of property; and WHEREAS, said City/Township desires the County to perform certain assessments on behalf of said City/Township; and WHEREAS, the County is willing to cooperate with said City/Township by completing the assessment in a proper manner; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein it is agreed as follows: 1. The County shall perform the 2020 and 2021 property assessment for the City/Township in accordance with the property assessment procedures and practices established and observed by the County, the validity and reasonableness of which are hereby acknowledged and approved by the City/Township. The property assessment by the County shall be composed of those assessment services which are set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference. 2. All information, records, data, reports, and the like that are necessary to allow the County to carry out its responsibilities under this Agreement shall be furnished to the County without charge by the City/Township and the City/Township agrees to cooperate in good faith with the County in carrying out the work under this Agreement. 3. The City/Township agrees to furnish, without charge, work space, if needed, for an appraiser to perform such tasks as document review, with such tasks to be performed during normal business hours for the City/Township. 4. The County agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the City/Township and all of its agents and employees against any and all claims, demands, actions or causes of action arising out of or by reason of the performance of work provided for herein to be performed by the County. It is further agreed that any and all full time employees of the County engaged in the performance of any work or services required or provided for herein shall be considered employees of the County only and not of the City/Township and that any and all claims that may arise under the Workman's Compensation Act of the State of Minnesota and any and all claims made by any third parties as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of said County employees shall be the sole obligation and responsibility of the County. 5. This Agreement shall commence on January 2, 2019 and shall terminate on June 30, 2021. Either party may initiate an extension of this Agreement for a term of two years by giving the other party written notice of its intent to extend no less than 120 days prior to the termination of this Agreement. If the party who receives said notice of intent to extend gives written notice 2 to the other party of its desire not to extend the Agreement at least 60 days prior to the termination of this Agreement, this Agreement shall terminate on June 30, 2021. 6. In consideration of said assessment services, the City/Township agrees to pay the County a fee of $13.00 per parcel for the 2020 and $14.00 per parcel for the 2021 assessment. In addition, there will be an additional fee of $50.00 for each new construction residential or commercial/industrial building permit with an estimated construction cost of $499,999.00 or less. There will also be an additional fee of $150.00 per parcel for each new construction residential or commercial/industrial building permit with an estimated construction cost of $500,000.00 or more. These additional fees shall be only applicable in those cities or townships which issue their own building permits. 7. Any notice which may be given or made by a party hereto under the terms of this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be sent by United States Mail or personally delivered to the other party addressed as follows: To City: City of Monticello 505 Walnut St, Ste #1 Monticello, MN 55362 To County: Anthony P. Rasmuson, Wright County Assessor Wright County Government Center 10 2nd Street NW, Room 100 Buffalo, MN 55313 8. The Agreement may be amended or modified only by written agreement signed by authorized representatives of the parties hereto. 3 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed by its duly authorized officers and delivered on its behalf, this 1 st day of November _ , 2018. WRIGHT COUNTY Dated: 11/1/2018 By Anthony s son Wright C my Assessor City of Monticello Dated: By Dated: By 0 EXHIBIT A During the term of this Agreement, the County shall: 1. Physically inspect and revalue real property, as required by law. 2. Physically inspect and value all new construction, additions and renovation 3. Conduct valuation reviews prior to Board of Review or Open Book Meeting. 4. Attend Board of Review or Open Book Meeting. Per Board request, make all necessary review appraisals. 5. Keep updated field card file - current values, homestead and classification data. 6. Print, mail and post valuation notices. 7. Respond to taxpayers regarding assessment or appraisal problems or inquiries periodically. 8. Make divisions and combinations periodically. 9. Administer the abatement process pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 375-192- 10. Make appraisals for, testify or negotiate all District Court or Tax Court filings. 11. Post values from appraisal cards to assessment rolls. 12. Adjust estimated market values on those properties not physically inspected as needed and per sales analysis. 5 Assessor Contract Schedules 11/8/2018 Rate Increase Impact Schedule of Annual Charges Year Amount Current Proposed Current Proposed 2013 $ 49,664.00 Parcel Tvpe Count Rate Rate Costs Costs $60,000 2016 Taxable 5028 $ 12.00 $ 13.00 $60,336.00 $65,364.00 $ 65,201.50 $30,000 Exempt 333 12.00 13.00 3,996.00 4,329.00 2021* $ 78,604.00 New construction 64 50.00 50.00 3,200.00 3,200.00 New Commercial <$500,000 1 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 New Commercial >$500,000 2 150.00 150.00 300.00 300.00 $ 67,882.00 $ 73,243.00 Change $ 5,361.00 Schedule of Parcel Counts by Year Parcel Tvpe 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Taxable 4669 4668 4603 4611 4633 4636 5028 New construction 2 22 52 73 44 61 64 New Commercial <$500,000 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 New Commercial >$500,000 5 1 2 2 1 6 2 Exempt 333 Schedule of Annual Charges Year Amount 2012 $ 49,599.50 $90,000 2013 $ 49,664.00 $80,000 2014 $ 49,831.50 $70,000 2015 $ 50,465.50 $60,000 2016 $ 49,871.50 $50,000 2017 $ 50,828.00 $40,000 2018 $ 65,201.50 $30,000 2019* $ 67,882.00 $20,000 2020* $ 73,243.00 $10,000 2021* $ 78,604.00 $- * Estimated using 2018 counts Assessor Charges 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019* 2020* 2021* City Council Agenda: 11/26/2018 2I. Consideration of approving Resolution 2018-93 accepting a donation of $600 from RiverWood Bank for extrication gloves for the Fire Department (JS) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The City Council is being asked to approve a donation from RiverWood Bank for extrication gloves for the Fire Department. As required by state statute, if the City accepts the donation of funds, the City Council needs to adopt a resolution specifying the amount of the donation and its use. Al. Budget Impact: The donation/sponsorship will be used to purchase the extrication gloves. A2. Staff Workload Impact: Minimal. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the Resolution accepting the contribution and authorize use of funds as specified. 2. Motion to not approve the contribution and return the funds to the donors. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommendation is to adopt the resolution accepting the contributions. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • Resolution 2018-93 1 City of Monticello RESOLUTION NO. 2018-93 RESOLUTION APPROVING CONTRIBUTIONS WHEREAS, the City of Monticello is generally authorized to accept contributions of real and personal property pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Sections 465.03 and 465.04 for the benefit of its citizens and is specifically authorized to maintain such property for the benefit of its citizens in accordance with the terms prescribed by the donor. Said gifts may be limited under provisions of MN Statutes Section 471.895. WHEREAS, the following persons and or entities have offered to contribute contributions or gifts to the City as listed: DONOR/ENTITY DESCRIPTION VALUE RiverWood BAnk Cash $600 WHEREAS, all said contributions are intended to aid the City in establishing facilities, operations or programs within the city's jurisdiction either alone or in cooperation with others, as allowed by law; and WHEREAS, the City Council hereby finds that it is appropriate to accept the contributions offered. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Monticello as follows: 1. The contributions described above are hereby accepted by the City of Monticello. 2. The contributions described above will be used as designated by the donor. This may entail reimbursing or allocating the money to another entity that will utilize the funds for the following stated purpose: DONOR/ENTITY PURPOSE/AMOUNT RiverWood Bank $600/Fire Department — Extrication Gloves Adopted by the City Council of Monticello this 26th day of November, 2018. Brian Stumpf, Mayor Jennifer Schreiber, City Clerk City Council Agenda — 11/26/2018 4A. Consideration to issue a Negative Declaration of Need for an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the proposed Haven Ridge development (AS/WSB) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND The City Council is asked to consider issuing a negative declaration of need for an Environmental Impact Statement for the proposed residential project known as Haven Ridge. City consulting engineer WSB has prepared an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for the proposed development. The project concept, located south of the Hunters Crossing development in the vicinity of Fallon Avenue and 85th Street, is proposed to include 279 single-family and 76 townhome units. Preparation of an EAW was a mandatory requirement given the proposed number of units. The purpose of an EAW is to identify environmental impacts, determine whether an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is needed, and to help inform future permitting. An EAW does not approve or deny a project. An EAW provides information about the project that may have the potential for significant environmental effects. The EAW process requires that the EAW be distributed to specific regulatory agencies and made available to any interested parties. The distribution of the EAW started the 30 day comment period, which extended from October 1 to October 31. A list of parties that the EAW was distributed to is attached. The distribution also included a public notice to the Environmental Quality Board Monitor (EQB) on October 1, 2018 and a public notice in the Monticello Times on October 4, 2018. Hard copies of the EAW were provided for public review at Monticello City Hall, Monticello Library, and the Great River Library. An electronic copy of the EAW was available on the City's website. Comments were received from three reviewing agencies (Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR), and State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO)) and Monticello Township. All substantial comments received within the 30 day comment period were addressed. The comments and the responses to the comments are attached as part of the Record of Decision Document. Based on the information in the EAW and the agency comments regarding the EAW, the project does not have the potential for significant environmental impacts that cannot be addressed through the permitting process. The permitting processes are identified in the EAW and include multiple City land use applications, as will as state and local permits. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS 1. Motion to issue the Negative Declaration of Need for an Environmental Impacts Statement (EIS) for the Haven Ridge development site. 2. Motion to authorize preparation of an EIS for the Haven Ridge development site, based on findings to be made by the City Council. City Council Agenda — 11/26/2018 3. Motion to table action for further information. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION City staff recommend Alternative #1 above. D. SUPPORTING DATA A. Resolution of Negative Declaration of Need B. Environmental Assessment Worksheet C. Record of Decision Document Findings of Fact EAW Comments Summary Response to Comments D. Response Letter to Monticello Township RESOLUTION NO. 2018-92 CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA A RESOLUTION ISSUING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF NEED WHEREAS, the City of Monticello prepared an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for the Haven Ridge development pursuant to Minnesota Rules 4410; and WHEREAS, the EAW was distributed to the agencies and public for the required 30 -day comment period October 1, 2018; and WHEREAS, the 30 -day comment period ended on October 31, 2018; and WHEREAS, the preparation of the Haven Ridge EAW and comments received on the EAW have generated information adequate to determine whether the proposed project has the potential for significant environmental impacts; and WHEREAS, the EAW has identified areas where the potential for significant environmental effects exist, but appropriate measures have or will be incorporated into the project plan and/or permits to reasonably mitigate these impacts; and WHEREAS, the Haven Ridge development is expected to comply with all the City of Monticello and review agency standards; and WHEREAS, based on the criteria established in Minnesota Rules 4410.1700, the project does not have the potential for significant environmental effects; and WHEREAS, based on the Findings of Fact and Conclusions, the project does not have the potential for significant environmental impacts. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Monticello hereby determines that an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota held this day of , 2018. Brian Stumpf, Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk July 2013 version ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET This Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) form and EAW Guidelines are available at the Environmental Quality Board's website at: htty://www.e(ib.state.mn.us/EnvRevGuidanceDocuments.htm. The EAW form provides information about a project that may have the potential for significant environmental effects. The EAW Guidelines provide additional detail and resources for completing the EAW form. Cumulative potential effects can either be addressed under each applicable EAW Item, or can be addresses collectively under EAW Item 19. Note to reviewers: Comments must be submitted to the RGU during the 30 -day comment period following notice of the EAW in the EQB Monitor. Comments should address the accuracy and completeness of information, potential impacts that warrant further investigation and the need for an EIS. 1. Project title: Haven Ridge Development 2. Proposer: Marc David Schulte Contact person: Marc David Schulte Title: Address: 1765 123rd Lane City, State, ZIP: Coon Rapids, MN 55448 Phone: 952-687-9590 Fax: 3. RGU: City of Monticello Contact person: Angela Schumann Title: Community Development Director Address: 505 Walnut Street City, State, ZIP: Monticello, MN 55362 Phone: 763-271-3224 Fax: Email: mareschulte911@gmail.com Email: angela.schumann@ci.monticello.mn.us 4. Reason for EAW Preparation: (check one) Required: Discretionary: ❑ EIS Scoping ❑ Citizen petition X Mandatory EAW ❑ RGU discretion ❑ Proposer initiated If EAW or EIS is mandatory give EQB rule category subpart number(s) and name(s): Subp. 19. Residential Development D. 5. Project Location: County: Wright City/Township: Monticello Township PLS Location (1/4,'/4, Section, Township, Range): 523, 524, 526, T121, R25 Watershed (81 major watershed scale): 17 — Mississippi River -St. Cloud and 18 — North Fork Crow River GPS Coordinates: Tax Parcel Number: 213100234101, 213100234102, 213100242200, 213100261200 page 1 At a minimum attach each of the following to the EAW: • County map showing the general location of the project; • U.S. Geological Survey 7.5 minute, 1:24,000 scale map indicating project boundaries (photocopy acceptable); and • Site plans showing all significant project and natural features. Pre -construction site plan and post - construction site plan. Appendix A -Figures Figure 1 — Project Location - County Location Figure 2 — Project Location - USGS Map Figure 3 — Project Location — Aerial Figure 4a — Site Plan, Concept Color Figure 4b — Site Plan, Concept with Phasing Figure 5 — Existing Land Use Figure 6 — Planned Land Use Figure 7 — Existing Zoning Figure 8 — Soil Survey of Wright County Figure 9 — Surface Water Resources Figure 10 —County Well Index Figure 11 — Potential Contamination Areas Figure 12 — Existing Land Cover Figure 13 — Historical Sites Appendix B — Agency Correspondence Appendix C — Traffic Impact Study Appendix D — Well Logs page 2 6. Project Description: a. Provide the brief project summary to be published in the EQB Monitor, (approximately 50 words). The City of Monticello has prepared an EAW for a proposed residential development on 217 acres currently in Monticello Township. As part of the approval process, the development will be considered for annexation to the City of Monticello. The project includes 279 single family home units and 76 townhome units built in at least three phases. Construction will also include utility and roadway extensions. b. Give a complete description of the proposed project and related new construction, including infrastructure needs. If the project is an expansion include a description of the existing facility. Emphasize: 1) construction, operation methods and features that will cause physical manipulation of the environment or will produce wastes, 2) modifications to existing equipment or industrial processes, 3) significant demolition, removal or remodeling of existing structures, and 4) timing and duration of construction activities. Marc David Schulte is proposing Haven Ridge, a new residential development in Monticello Township. Prior to construction, the development will be considered for annexation to the City of Monticello. The project concept includes 279 single family home units and 76 townhome units. The project will include new infrastructure, such as gas, electric, telecommunications, sanitary sewer, storm sewer, watermain, streets, stormwater ponds, parking, sidewalks, trails, and streets. Sewer and water will connect with current municipal facilities. The project will occur in phases. Construction is expected to start in 2019. The project location is depicted in Figures 1-3, Appendix A. The proposed development plan is shown in Figure 4a and Figure 4b, Appendix A. Site Preparation and Grading — The site will be graded for residential lots, streets, and utilities. All grading and soil disturbance activity will occur in accordance with the Minnesota General Construction Stormwater Permit issued by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and City of Monticello requirements. The site will be graded in phases as development occurs. Utilities — The project will include new utility infrastructure, such as gas, electric, telecommunications, sanitary sewer, storm sewer, and watermain. Sewer and water will connect with municipal facilities. The City of Monticello is studying and planning for any necessary trunk utility improvements to connect the Haven Ridge development with municipal sewer and water service. At this time the proposed development will connect to the existing Monticello trunk sewer and water systems. The proposed development will connect to the Monticello water distribution system via the existing 12 -inch trunk watermain in the Klein Farms and Hunters Crossing subdivisions located north and west of the site. The proposed development will connect to the Monticello sanitary sewer system via an existing 10 -inch sanitary sewer in Farmstead Avenue or a newly installed lateral or trunk sanitary sewer. Future phases of the development will require the construction of a sanitary lift station or use of the newly installed trunk system. Building Construction — Building construction includes 279 single family home units and 76 townhome units built in phases. page 3 Roads/Pavin2 — The project will include construction of residential streets including trails, sidewalks, curb, and gutter. Demolition — The existing homestead and various outbuildings will be abandoned and demolition of these buildings will be required. c. Project magnitude: Total Project Acreage 217 acres Linear project length NA Number and type of residential units 355 units total, 339 unattached and 16 attached Commercial building area (in square feet) 0 Industrial building area (in square feet) 0 Institutional building area (in square feet) 0 Other uses — specify (in square feet) 0 Structure height(s) 2-3 stories * The type of units (unattached vs. attached) were identified according to the EAW guidance where unattached is single family homes and multi -family homes with three or fewer units and attached is multi -family home with four or greater units. d. Explain the project purpose; if the project will be carried out by a governmental unit, explain the need for the project and identify its beneficiaries. The Haven Ridge development is proposed by private development partners. The project will provide housing to meet the market-driven needs for increased housing in the City of Monticello and Wright County. e. Are future stages of this development including development on any other property planned or likely to happen? ❑ Yes X No If yes, briefly describe future stages, relationship to present project, timeline and plans for environmental review. f. Is this project a subsequent stage of an earlier project? ❑ Yes X No If yes, briefly describe the past development, timeline and any past environmental review. page 4 7. Cover types: Estimate the acreage of the site with each of the following cover types before and after development: Table 1. Land Cover Before After Before After Wetlands 29 25 Lawn/landscaping 0 58.6 Deep 8.6 8.6 Impervious 5.7 92.3 water/streams surface Wooded/forest 9.5 0 Stormwater Pond 0 8.6 Brush/Grassland 32.2 23.9 Other (describe) 0 0 Cropland 132 0 TOTAL 217 217 8. Permits and approvals required: List all known local, state and federal permits, approvals, certifications and financial assistance for the project. Include modifications of any existing permits, governmental review of plans and all direct and indirect forms of public financial assistance including bond guarantees, Tax Increment Financing and infrastructure. All of these final decisions are prohibited until all appropriate environmental review has been completed. See Minnesota Rules, Chapter 4410.3100. Table 2. Approvals and Permits Required Unit of Government Type of Application Status Federal US Army Corps of Engineers Section 404 Permit To Be Obtained, if needed State Department of Natural Resources Water Appropriation Permit To Be Obtained, if needed Pollution Control Agency NPDES Construction Permit To Be Obtained Pollution Control Agency Sanitary Sewer Extension To Be Obtained Pollution Control Agency Section 401 Permit To Be Obtained, if needed Department of Health Watermain Extension/Plan Review To Be Obtained County Wright County Soil and Water Conservation Wetland Conservation Act Approval To Be Obtained District Wright County Final Plat approval To Be Obtained Wright County Highway Department Approval To Be Obtained Local City of Monticello Development Application/Land To Be Obtained Disturbance Permit City of Monticello Planned Unit Development To Be Obtained Application City of Monticello Amendment to Comprehensive Land To Be Obtained Use Plan City of Monticello Annexation Petition To Be Obtained City of Monticello Preliminary and Final Plat Approvals To Be Obtained page 5 City of Monticello I Rezoning Approval I To Be Obtained Cumulative potential effects may be considered and addressed in response to individual EAW Item Nos. 9-18, or the RGU can address all cumulative potential effects in response to EAW Item No. 19. If addressing cumulative effect under individual items, make sure to include information requested in EAW Item No. 19 9. Land use: a. Describe: i. Existing land use of the site as well as areas adjacent to and near the site, including parks, trails, prime or unique farmlands. The site is a mix of pasture and farmland with one homestead. The project area contains both prime and unique farmlands. The northern part of the project area along Fallon Avenue is identified as prime farmland by the Wright County Soil Survey. The southern part of the project area is identified as farmland of state importance. Areas around wetlands are identified as prime farmland if drained or prime farmland if protected from flooding. The larger wetland areas are identified as not prime farmland. The City of Monticello's city boundary is immediately north of the project area. The area near the project area that is within the City of Monticello is made up of residential developments with typical development amenities like city parks, sidewalks, and trails. The other areas around the project area are a mix of farm land and rural residential. The project area is bordered to the northwest by a City of Monticello residential development, to the south by a public waters wetland, and to the west and east by farmland with scattered rural homesteads. ii. Plans. Describe planned land use as identified in comprehensive plan (if available) and any other applicable plan for land use, water, or resources management by a local, regional, state, or federal agency. The area has been identified in multiple plans as an annexation area for the City of Monticello. The northern tip of the project area along Fallon Avenue and 851h Street was included as part of the original annexation area that was identified in the 1995 Orderly Annexation Agreement (OAA) between the City of Monticello and Monticello Township. Subsequent revisions of the OAA have expanded that annexation area to include the entire project area. The north part of project area along Fallon Avenue is identified in the City of Monticello's 2008 Comprehensive Plan (2008 Comp Plan) as a Place to Live. The Place to Live category designates areas where housing is or will be the primary land use. The 2008 Comp Plan specifies that this category includes a variety of housing types to accommodate a range of households within the City. The rest of the project area is identified in the 2008 Comp Plan as Urban Reserve. The Urban Reserve category contains all areas in the OAA that are not listed for development in the near term of the 2008 Comp Plan. The objective of the Urban Reserve category is to encourage rural and agricultural uses in the short term to preserve the area for future development opportunities. The 2008 Comp Plan anticipated the City of page 6 Monticello will eventually expand into the Urban Reserve area once the other planned use areas like the Place to Live category areas are developed and future growth is needed. Part of the Urban Reserve area is also likely to be preserved as natural resource areas or for agricultural purposes. The area is identified in the Monticello Township Land Use Plan as Transition Area. Transition Areas are land at the urban/rural fringe. Transition Areas are identified by Wright County to economically and efficiently accommodate growth pressures. iii. Zoning, including special districts or overlays such as shoreland, floodplain, wild and scenic rivers, critical area, agricultural preserves, etc. The area zoned by Wright County as general agricultural. As stated above, the area is within the OAA between the City of Monticello and Monticello Township. b. Discuss the project's compatibility with nearby land uses, zoning, and plans listed in Item 9a above, concentrating on implications for environmental effects. New residential developments of this scale and density within the OAA are anticipated under the terms of the OAA agreement to be annexed to the City of Monticello and served with municipal utilities. The residential development is compatible with the 2008 Comp Plan including its location in Urban Reserve. The location of the development follows the City of Monticello and Monticello Township's intent to orderly development the area. The location is contiguous to the current corporate boundary, adjacent to existing residential development, and can be served by available municipal utilities and/or capacity. c. Identify measures incorporated into the proposed project to mitigate any potential incompatibility as discussed in Item 9b above. The development approval process will need to include rezoning and annexation of the area by the City of Monticello in order make the project compatible with relevant plans and agreements. The relevant approvals and permits for this process are included in Table 2. 10. Geology, soils and topography/land forms: a. Geology - Describe the geology underlying the project area and identify and map any susceptible geologic features such as sinkholes, shallow limestone formations, unconfined/shallow aquifers, or karst conditions. Discuss any limitations of these features for the project and any effects the project could have on these features. Identify any project designs or mitigation measures to address effects to geologic features. The Project area overlies surficial glacial terrain primarily composed of Quaternary -age sediments deposited by the most recent glacial period, the Wisconsin Episode. Sediment depth within the project area ranges from 100 to 200 feet above sedimentary, Paleozoic age bedrock. No bedrock outcrops exist in Wright County. Soils in this area are principally derived from glacial till and are interbedded with occasional fluvial sand or gravel outwash deposits. page 7 The Project area overlies Middle to Upper Cambrian age sandstone and siltstone bedrock. The southern boundary of the project area encounters bedrock of the Eau Claire Formation, which is described as consisting of very fine-grained, feldspathic sandstone and siltstone, with small inclusions of shale partings. The Eau Claire Formation has a maximum thickness of 70 feet and generally has very low permeability. The majority of the project area overlies Wonewoc Sandstone, which is quartzose in composition and ranges from a fine-grained texture at the base to a coarser, more poorly sorted texture at the upper part of the formation. The northeastern corner of the Project area encounters bedrock of the Tunnel City Group, which includes Mazomanie Formation sandstone (present in the upper 40 feet of bedrock) overlying Lone Rock Formation sandstone and siltstone interbedded with thin shale partings. The Mazomanie sandstone is a medium -grain composition and has high permeability and potential for aquifers. The Lone Rock sandstone is feldspathic and fine-grained, and generally has very low permeability. There are no bedrock exposures, karst features, or known geologic hazards due to the bedrock within the project area. Surficial geologic mapping in the area shows a large portion of the Project area overlying fluvial glacial outwash comprised of sand and gravel of mixed provenance. This outwash may be intermixed with or buried below patchy areas of till. The southeastern corner of the Project area may encounter till of loam to sandy -loam composition intermixed with small lenses of silt, sand, and gravel in places. The outwash and till present in the project area are characteristic of the Twin Cities Member, belonging to the New Ulm Formation. Sediment of the Twin Cities Member was deposited by ice and meltwater from the Grantsburg sublobe, an offshoot of the Des Moines lobe, as it retreated and passed over the St. Croix Moraine. Quaternary sediment in Wright County is very thick and may range from 100-200 feet within the project area. Wright County obtains most of its groundwater from stratified sedimentary bedrock sources. The project area overlies Wonewoc Sandstone, which is highly permeable bedrock and is the primary source layer of most aquifers in Wright County. However, shallow water -table conditions are common in Wright County. The water table in the project area ranges mainly from 20-22 feet below surface, with some small areas that may reach 20 feet below surface on the western side of the project area. There are areas within the project boundaries where water is present at the surface. Data from the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) County Well Index locates five wells within a 500 -foot boundary of the Project area. Static water level depth data from these wells ranges from 20-51 feet below surface, and depends on topography and climate conditions, as shallow groundwater systems are replenished solely by precipitation. For more information on well data from the Project area, please refer to Section 11. The deep glacial sediments and deeply buried bedrock do not present any limitations to the proposed residential development project. Due to the outwash underlying most of the project area, the shallow subsurface likely contains materials suitable for fill. According to the DNR, the project is positioned in an area that has potential for aggregate resources. Other aggregate deposits are likely within the area but have not been investigated and mapped. Excavations, borrow, and grading are expected to be in the upper 20 feet of the existing surface and are not anticipated to encounter geologic bedrock hazards; however, soil limitations for roadways and residential development, discussed in more detail below, and a potential to impact page 8 shallow alluvial aquifers requires engineering assessments and preparation of plans and specifications that acknowledge the limitations and risks. b. Soils and topography - Describe the soils on the site, giving NRCS (SCS) classifications and descriptions, including limitations of soils. Describe topography, any special site conditions relating to erosion potential, soil stability or other soils limitations, such as steep slopes, highly permeable soils. Provide estimated volume and acreage of soil excavation and/or grading. Discuss impacts from project activities (distinguish between construction and operational activities) related to soils and topography. Identify measures during and after project construction to address soil limitations including stabilization, soil corrections or other measures. Erosion/sedimentation control related to stormwater runoff should be addressed in response to Item 11.b.ii. Table 3 lists the soils in the project area. The soils are well drained to poorly drained. The existing site topography is mostly flat with some shallow hills in the northeast section of the project area and small depressions around surface waters. Figure 8, Appendix A shows the soils on the project area. Table 3. Wright County Soil Survey Map Percent Symbol Soil Name Slope 1037 Eckvoll loamy fine sand, map >25, 0 to 3 percent slopes 0% to 3% 106C2 Lester loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes, eroded 6% to 12% 106D2 Lester loam, 12 to 18 percent slopes, eroded 12% to 18% 1080 Klossner, Okoboji, and Glencoe soils, ponded, 0 to 1 percent slopes 0% to 1% 109 Cordova clay loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes 0% to 2% 1110 Isan sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes 0% to 2% 114 Glencoe clay loam, depressional, 0 to 1 percent slopes 0% to 1% 1224 Hubbard-Verndale, acid substratum, complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes 0% to 3% 1362B Angus loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes 2% to 5% 1368 Southhaven loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes 0% to 2% 1377B Dorset -Two Inlets complex, 2 to 6 percent slopes 2% to 6% 1377C Dorset -Two Inlets complex, 6 to 12 percent slopes 6% to 12% 1379B Dorset-Almora complex, 1 to 4 percent slopes 1% to 4% 1388B Terril loam, moderately wet, 2 to 6 percent slopes 2% to 6% 1438B Braham loamy fine sand, moderately wet, 2 to 5 percent slopes 2% to 5% 1901B Angus -Le Sueur complex, 1 to 5 percent slopes 1% to 5% 1942 Forada mucky loam, depressional, 0 to 1 percent slopes 0% to 1% 1975 Oylen sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes 0% to 2% 260 Duelm loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes 0% to 2% page 9 Map Percent Symbol Soil Name Slope 375 Forada loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes 0% to 2% 406 Dorset sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes 0% to 2% 441 Almora loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes 0% to 2% W Water The volume and acreage of soil moved has been estimated based on assuming approximately 1.5 feet of material will be graded over the development area (217 acres). Construction will involve the movement of 325.5 acre-feet of soil. Development within the project area will be designed to conform with applicable state and local standards, including National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Construction Stormwater General Permit requirements. NOTE: For silica sand projects, the EAW must include a hydrogeologic investigation assessing the potential groundwater and surface water effects and geologic conditions that could create an increased risk of potentially significant effects on groundwater and surface water. Descriptions of water resources and potential effects from the project in EAW Item 11 must be consistent with the geology, soils and topography/land forms and potential effects described in EAW Item 10. 11. Water resources: a. Describe surface water and groundwater features on or near the site in a.i. and adi. below. i. Surface water - lakes, streams, wetlands, intermittent channels, and county/judicial ditches. Include any special designations such as public waters, trout stream/lake, wildlife lakes, migratory waterfowl feeding/resting lake, and outstanding resource value water. Include water quality impairments or special designations listed on the current MPCA 303d Impaired Waters List that are within 1 mile of the project. Include DNR Public Waters Inventory number(s), if any. A wetland delineation was completed in 2018 by Kjolhaug Environmental. This wetland delineation is being reviewed by the Wright County Soil and Water Conservation District as the Local Government Unit for the Wetland Conservation Act. Based on this wetland delineation, there are 11 wetlands within the project boundary covering an area of approximately 29 acres. One of the wetlands is an unnamed DNR Public Water Wetland. There are no other special designated waters within the project area. ii. Groundwater — aquifers, springs, seeps. Include: 1) depth to groundwater; 2) if project is within a MDH wellhead protection area; 3) identification of any onsite and/or nearby wells, including unique numbers and well logs if available. If there are no wells known on site or nearby, explain the methodology used to determine this. The static groundwater level is approximately 20-22 feet below the land surface. The proposed development is located outside of the City of Monticello's Drinking Water Supply Management Area (DWSMA). There are no wells located within the proposed development, however there are five wells located within 500 feet of the development boundary. Figure 10, page 10 Appendix A shows the well locations and Table 4 lists the well, its status, its use, and its groundwater elevation. Well logs are available in Appendix D. Any wells that would be impacted by the Project would be sealed by a licensed well contractor according to Minnesota Rules, Chapter 4725, or be relocated and coordinated with the MPCA and MDH. Table 4. Project Area Wells Well ID Status Use Water Elevation (feet) 609694 Active Domestic 20 136613 Active Domestic 51 523950 Active Domestic 38 662223 Active Domestic 22 789748 Active Irrigation 21 b. Describe effects from project activities on water resources and measures to minimize or mitigate the effects in Item b.i. through Item b.iv. below. Wastewater - For each of the following, describe the sources, quantities and composition of all sanitary, municipal/domestic and industrial wastewater produced or treated at the site. 1) If the wastewater discharge is to a publicly owned treatment facility, identify any pretreatment measures and the ability of the facility to handle the added water and waste loadings, including any effects on, or required expansion of, municipal wastewater infrastructure. 2) If the wastewater discharge is to a subsurface sewage treatment systems (SSTS), describe the system used, the design flow, and suitability of site conditions for such a system. 3) If the wastewater discharge is to surface water, identify the wastewater treatment methods and identify discharge points and proposed effluent limitations to mitigate impacts. Discuss any effects to surface or groundwater from wastewater discharges. Wastewater generated within the proposed development will discharge to the Monticello sanitary sewer system via an existing 10 -inch sanitary sewer in Farmstead Avenue and/or a newly installed lateral or trunk sanitary sewer. Future phases of the development will require the construction of a sanitary lift station or use of the newly installed trunk system. At present, the local sanitary sewer system has sufficient capacity for projected flows from the development. Wastewater will be conveyed through the City sanitary sewer system to the Monticello Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP). The Monticello WWTP has a treatment capacity of 2.36 million gallons per day (MGD). The average flow to the Monticello WWTP from 2015-2017 was 1.26 MGD, so the plant has a residual capacity of 1.10 MGD. Table 5 is an estimate of the wastewater flow from the proposed development. page 11 Table 5. Wastewater Flow Calculations Flow Land Use Type Units Assumption (gpd/unit)* R1 Lot Residential 243 182 RA Lot Residential 36 182 R3 Lot Residential 76 182 Average Flow (gpd) Average Daily Flow (gpd) Peak Hourly Flow Factor** Peak Hourly Flow (gpd) Peak Hourly Flow (gpm) *Based on 85% of water use in 201 7for existing residential development in the area. **Peak factor based on average daily flow per standard Metropolitan Council values. 44,226 6,552 13,832 64,610 4.0 258,440 179 The Monticello WWTP has sufficient residual capacity to treat the estimated 0.06 MGD of average wastewater flow that will be generated by the proposed development. Additionally, the wastewater will be domestic in character and will not require specific pretreatment measures. ii. Stormwater - Describe the quantity and quality of stormwater runoff at the site prior to and post construction. Include the routes and receiving water bodies for runoff from the site (major downstream water bodies as well as the immediate receiving waters). Discuss any environmental effects from stormwater discharges. Describe stormwater pollution prevention plans including temporary and permanent runoff controls and potential BMP site locations to manage or treat stormwater runoff. Identify specific erosion control, sedimentation control or stabilization measures to address soil limitations during and after project construction. ExistinLy Conditions Under existing conditions, the site contains primarily agricultural land with wetlands and scattered rural homesteads. Stormwater discharges from the site at three locations as shown in Figure 9, Appendix A. Table 6 below lists the tributary area for each of the sub -watershed discharge locations identified in the 2006 Monticello Water Resources Management Plan (WRMP). Table 6. Tributary Area Summary Discharge Location Area (ac) TH27 25.4 GL -04 106.0 KFS -09/10 84.7 TH27 is part of the Trunk Highway 25 subwatershed system that discharges to north to the large basin on the west side of Trunk Highway 25 north of School Boulevard. KFS - 09/10 is part of the Klein Farms subwatershed system and discharges west under Fallon page 12 Avenue NE and along the power line corridor to the large basin on the west side of Trunk Highway 25 north of School Boulevard. Both of these major subwatersheds ultimately drain north to the Mississippi River and are included in the Citywide HydroCAD model. There are no existing stormwater treatment or infiltration basins within either of the TH27 or KFS -09/10 subwatersheds. GL -04 drains through a series of basins and is part of the Gillchrist Lake subwatershed. GL -04 does not drain to the Mississippi River. Gillchrist Lake is located approximately 5 miles from the City of Monticello, near the City of Buffalo. The Gillchrist Lake subwatershed is included in the WRMP, however it is not included in the Citywide HydroCAD model. Even though this area was not included in the HydroCAD model, City standards and design criteria are applicable. GL -04-1 does not have existing stormwater treatment or infiltration basins. This segment of the Mississippi River (AVID 07010203-729) is impaired for PCB and mercury in fish tissue and fecal coliform (2018 Impaired Waters List, MPCA). This affects aquatic consumption and recreational uses. As of 2018, the MPCA does not list Gillchrist Lake as an impaired water. A HydroCAD model was created to compare the existing and proposed discharge rates leaving the site. The proposed model was based on preliminary development design and it was assumed that existing drainage patterns will be maintained post -project. Atlas 14 MSE3 storm events depths that were simulated in the models and are provided in Table 7. Table 7. Atlas 14 MSE3 Storms Storm Event Rainfall Depth (in) 2 year, 24 -hr 2.84 10 year, 24 -hr 4.22 100 year, 24 -hr 6.87 Existing peak discharge rates at each of the three locations are provided in Table 8. Table 8. Existing Peak Discharge Rates Leaving the Site Discharge Location 2 -year (cfs) 10 -year (cfs) 100 -year (cfs) TH27 14 33 75 KF -09/10 38 88 200 GL -04 45 102 228 Relevant Regulations and Considerations The required regulations and permits related to temporary and permanent stormwater management are: • City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance- Chapter 4, section 4.10 related to grading, drainage, stormwater management and erosion control page 13 City of Monticello Plan Requirements and Design Guidelines (Design Manual) City of Monticello Grading Permit Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) National Pollutant Discharge/State Disposal System (NPDES/SDS) Construction Stormwater (CSW) Permit All grading and erosion control plans shall conform to the most recent editions of the Minnesota Stormwater Manual, the National Urban Runoff Program (NURP), NPDES/SDS CSW Permit, MPCA Minimal Impact Design Standards (MIDS), the City of Monticello Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan, the City's most recent Design Standards (Design Manual), and City Standard Detail Plates. Required plan submittal materials and hydrologic/hydraulic models are listed in the Design Manual. Conformance to City Standards is the most restrictive. Specifically, the City regulates stormwater runoff rate, volume, and treatment. The requirements are as follows: - Runoff Rate Control: Peak runoff rates for the proposed development shall not exceed existing peak runoff rates for the 2-, 10-, and 100 -year Atlas 14 storm events for all points where stormwater leaves the property. Detention basins shall be designed with an outlet sized to meet runoff rate control and live storage capacity to contain the critical 100 -year storm event. Conformance to City freeboard standards will be based on the 100 -year critical High Water Level Elevation (HWL). For preliminary planning purposes the proposed HydroCAD model was used to estimate the area footprint for stormwater rate control ponds. The anticipated footprint is based on 4:1 side slopes and a maximum depth of 4 feet between the outlet and the 100 -year HWL. Table 9 summarizes the model results. Table 9. Approximate Stormwater Pond Area Required for Rate Control Subwatershed Pond Area at 100 -year HWL (ac) TH27 2.0 KF -09/10 4.0 GL -04 4.6 - Runoff Volume Control: Runoff volume control shall be provided on-site. Proposed developments shall capture and retain 1.1 inches of runoff from the new and/or fully developed impervious surfaces. An estimate of the approximate footprint that would be required for an infiltration basin that meets City standards is provided in Table 10. The size of the infiltration basin is largely dependent on the underlying soils and a maximum allowable 48-hour drawdown time. The Wright County Soil Survey indicates that this area is made up almost entirely of Hydrologic Soil Group (HSG) Type B soils. For this reason, an infiltration rate of 0.45 inches per hour was used for the calculation, based on page 14 guidance from the Minnesota Stormwater Manual. It is important to note that design infiltration rates, along with feasibility, must be confirmed with recent infiltration testing and soil boring results prior to construction. Table 10. Approximate Area Required for Infiltration Basin Subwatershed Area (ac) TH27 1.0 KF -09/10 1.7 GL -04 2.6 - Water Quality Treatment: New development projects are to have a no net increase from pre -project conditions of total volume, Total Suspended Solids (TSS), and Total Phosphorus (TP). The NPDES water quality standard is to design a basin with a permanent volume of 1,800 cubic feet of storage below the outlet pipe for each acre that drains to the basin. The approximate area required to meet this standard is the area encompassed by the water surface for the pond (Table 11). Table 11. Approximate Surface Area at NWL Subwatershed Area (ac) TH27 0.3 KF -09/10 0.8 GL -04 0.9 For new development, the water quality treatment standards are satisfied if the volume control standard has been satisfied, with pretreatment. This also assumes that the infiltration basin receives runoff from new impervious surfaces, otherwise treatment will not be occurring. If infiltration is determined to be not feasible, the MIDS Design Sequence Flowchart and the City Design Guide provide guidance on how to meet water quality standards. The City requires that any relevant data for the variance request is well documented and included in submittals. In addition to the requirements listed above, a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) will need to be prepared in accordance with NPDES guidelines and the City Design Guide. The SWPPP and permit shall be submitted and approved prior to construction. Stormwater management for the site will be met through various BMPs as outlined in this section. It is possible for the total area required for volume, water quality, and rate control to be provided within the footprint of the 100 -year HWL elevation at the rate control pond. The Minnesota Stormwater Manual provides guidance for possible design options. page 15 The proposed ponding areas shown in the concept plan will need to be further evaluated as the project moves forward. Existing drainage patterns will need to be maintained along with following the requirements outlined in this section. The design, plans and stormwater management report need to be submitted for review prior to the City issuing a grading permit. There will be no anticipated downstream environmental effects from the proposed project based on the project meeting the state and local requirements listed in this document. Water appropriation - Describe if the project proposes to appropriate surface or groundwater (including dewatering). Describe the source, quantity, duration, use and purpose of the water use and if a DNR water appropriation permit is required. Describe any well abandonment. If connecting to an existing municipal water supply, identify the wells to be used as a water source and any effects on, or required expansion of, municipal water infrastructure. Discuss environmental effects from water appropriation, including an assessment of the water resources available for appropriation. Identify any measures to avoid, minimize, or mitigate environmental effects from the water appropriation. The proposed development will connect to the Monticello water distribution system via the existing 12 -inch trunk watermain in the Klein Farms and Hunters Crossing sub- divisions. The City's water supply system includes five (5) groundwater wells, one (1) water tower, two (2) ground storage tanks, and approximately 49 miles of watermain. From 2010-2015, the City's average groundwater withdrawal was 573 million gallons per year (MGY). The City's existing DNR water appropriation permit allows for withdrawal of up to 800 MGY. Table 12 is an estimate of the water demands for the proposed development. Based on the estimated annual demand of 27.7 MGY, additional groundwater appropriation will not be required. The entire development is located outside of the City's Drinking Water Supply Management Area (DWSMA). Table 12. Water Demand Calculations Demand Average Land Use Type Units Assumption Demand (gpd/unit)* (gpd) RI Lot Residential 243 214 52,002 RA Lot Residential 36 214 7,704 R3 Lot Residential 76 214 16,264 Average Day Demand (gpd) 75,970 Annual Demand (MGY) 27.7 Peak Day Demand Factor** 2.6 Peak Day Demand (gpd) 197,522 Peak Day Demand (gpm) 137 *Unit demand based on water use data for residential customers in the area in 2017. **Historical peak day factor from 2010-2015. page 16 iv. Surface Waters a) Wetlands - Describe any anticipated physical effects or alterations to wetland features such as draining, filling, permanent inundation, dredging and vegetative removal. Discuss direct and indirect environmental effects from physical modification of wetlands, including the anticipated effects that any proposed wetland alterations may have to the host watershed. Identify measures to avoid (e.g., available alternatives that were considered), minimize, or mitigate environmental effects to wetlands. Discuss whether any required compensatory wetland mitigation for unavoidable wetland impacts will occur in the same minor or major watershed, and identify those probable locations. Based on the draft wetland delineation report submitted by the developer and the proposed concept plan, there will be approximately four acres of wetland impact. The total acreage of wetlands on the site would decrease from 29 acres to 25 acres. Figure 9, Appendix A shows the draft wetland boundaries. There is a total of eleven wetlands on the site. Impacts to wetlands will occur from the filling of wetlands for residential lots and roadways. From the concept plan, it appears that five of the ten impacted wetlands will be completely impacted. The other five impacted wetlands will be partially filled by residential lots or roadways. One wetland, the large public waters wetland, will be completed avoided. It is unknown at this time if any of the impact wetlands are outside of regulation by either the Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) or USACE Section 404. The jurisdictional status will need to be determined during the wetland boundary/type approval or the wetland permitting process. Due to the presence of wetlands on the site, the developer is required to submit a wetland delineation report to the Wright County SWCD as LGU for WCA, for the SWCD's review and approval. Approved wetland delineation lines are required to be shown on all relevant plans. The developer has started this process by submitting a wetland delineation report to Wright County SWCD in August 2018. The development is also required under WCA to either avoid all impacts to wetlands or to submit a wetland permit justifying the wetland impacts and proposing mitigation for them. Wright County SWCD will look for the developer to either submit a plan showing no wetland impacts or submit a wetland permit. It is unlikely that the developer would be able to accomplish the development as shown in the concept plan without impacting wetlands. Since the current concept plan shows wetland impacts, it is anticipated that the project will impact wetlands, therefore a wetland replacement plan and permit should be submitted. Approval of the wetland permit is required prior to site construction. As part of the wetland permit, the development will need to follow the minimization requirements. Wetland mitigation will be required to follow the siting requirements for WCA and the USACE. The City of Monticello also requires wetland buffers to be designed around wetlands within the project area. Designation of the wetland buffers will be required as part of the development plans. The concept plan does not show wetland buffers. Future plans will be required to show wetland buffers. page 17 b) Other surface waters- Describe any anticipated physical effects or alterations to surface water features (lakes, streams, ponds, intermittent channels, county/judicial ditches) such as draining, filling, permanent inundation, dredging, diking, stream diversion, impoundment, aquatic plant removal and riparian alteration. Discuss direct and indirect environmental effects from physical modification of water features. Identify measures to avoid, minimize, or mitigate environmental effects to surface water features, including in -water Best Management Practices that are proposed to avoid or minimize turbidity/sedimentation while physically altering the water features. Discuss how the project will change the number or type of watercraft on any water body, including current and projected watercraft usage. There is one surface water feature (a DNR Public Water Wetland) within the project area. The development concept plan shows no impacts to this or other surface water features. The City of Monticello will require a wetland buffer to be established around the DNR Public Water Wetland. BMPs around the wetland will be required under the NPDES permit as well. 12. Contamination/Hazardous Materials/Wastes: a. Pre -project site conditions - Describe existing contamination or potential environmental hazards on or in close proximity to the project site such as soil or ground water contamination, abandoned dumps, closed landfills, existing or abandoned storage tanks, and hazardous liquid or gas pipelines. Discuss any potential environmental effects from pre - project site conditions that would be caused or exacerbated by project construction and operation. Identify measures to avoid, minimize or mitigate adverse effects from existing contamination or potential environmental hazards. Include development of a Contingency Plan or Response Action Plan. Publicly available data from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) database were reviewed to identify verified or potentially contaminated sites that may be encountered during the proposed development (Figure 11, Appendix A). The following databases were reviewed: MPCA "What's in My Neighborhood?" website MPCA Storage Tank Leak Site website US Department of Agriculture "What's in My Neighborhood?" website Two listings exist within the project site (site ID 53398 and 58100), and several other listings exist within 500 feet of the project area. These listings on the project site are both feedlots. Within 500 feet, the listings include Hazardous Waste, Water, and Multiple Listings. Based on this review, the potential to encounter contaminated soil and/or groundwater at the proposed project area is low. If any contaminated soil/groundwater or hazardous material is encountered, necessary steps to remediate will be taken in accordance with MPCA regulations. b. Project related generation/storage of solid wastes - Describe solid wastes generated/stored during construction and/or operation of the project. Indicate method of disposal. Discuss potential environmental effects from solid waste handling, storage and disposal. Identify page 18 measures to avoid, minimize or mitigate adverse effects from the generation/storage of solid waste including source reduction and recycling. Development associated with the project will generate solid waste and construction debris normal to construction. Solid waste and construction debris will be disposed of in conformance with state standards. The proposed residential development is expected to generate typical household wastes. Users will be required to recycle consistent with the City's policies, and all recycling and solid waste disposal will be removed from the site by licensed haulers. c. Project related use/storage of hazardous materials - Describe chemicals/hazardous materials used/stored during construction and/or operation of the project including method of storage. Indicate the number, location and size of any above or below ground tanks to store petroleum or other materials. Discuss potential environmental effects from accidental spill or release of hazardous materials. Identify measures to avoid, minimize or mitigate adverse effects from the use/storage of chemicals/hazardous materials including source reduction and recycling. Include development of a spill prevention plan. Small amounts of hazardous materials typical of a construction site (e.g., fuel oil) will be stored in approved containers. As required by the NPDES Construction Stormwater Permit, the fuel containers will be required to have secondary containment by either being bermed or stored in a truck or other facility. Fuel trucks and any other hazardous material are required to be locked when not in use to avoid vandalism. d. Project related generation/storage of hazardous wastes - Describe hazardous wastes generated/stored during construction and/or operation of the project. Indicate method of disposal. Discuss potential environmental effects from hazardous waste handling, storage, and disposal. Identify measures to avoid, minimize or mitigate adverse effects from the generation/storage of hazardous waste including source reduction and recycling. Construction within any of the subject parcels will not involve the generation of significant amounts of hazardous wastes. Once construction is completed, it is anticipated that the waste generated will be of similar nature to household wastes and will be disposed of similarly. There are no gas stations proposed that would include storing of hazardous materials. page 19 13. Fish, wildlife, plant communities, and sensitive ecological resources (rare features): a. Describe fish and wildlife resources as well as habitats and vegetation on or in near the site. Current land cover consists mostly of agricultural land, wetlands and a small portion of short grasses and mixed trees. The only notable wildlife resources on site consist of the wetlands and wooded area that surrounds it, which could contain habitat for waterfowl. The public water wetland on the south edge of the site provides habitat for fish. There are no designated trout streams, Wildlife Management Areas, Waterfowl Production Areas, Wildlife Refuges, Reinvest in Minnesota (RIM) easements, wild rice lakes, or Outstanding Resource Value Waters (ORVWs) within any of the parcels. There are no Minnesota County Biological Survey (MCBS) or Areas of Ecological Significance within or near the project area. b. Describe rare features such as state -listed (endangered, threatened or special concern) species, native plant communities, Minnesota County Biological Survey Sites of Biodiversity Significance, and other sensitive ecological resources on or within close proximity to the site. Provide the license agreement number (LA-) and/or correspondence number (ERDB ) from which the data were obtained and attach the Natural Heritage letter from the DNR. Indicate if any additional habitat or species survey work has been conducted within the site and describe the results. A request for data was sent to the DNR and a response has not been received yet. c. Discuss how the identified fish, wildlife, plant communities, rare features and ecosystems may be affected by the project. Include a discussion on introduction and spread of invasive species from the project construction and operation. Separately discuss effects to known threatened and endangered species. The City of Monticello completed a Natural Resources Inventory that included the project area. The Natural Resources Inventory was used to evaluate site land cover. The planned development will result in the removal of vegetation and subsequent habitat, primarily in areas planned for development. The current site is already mostly unsuitable habitat. The development is expected to occur on areas that are currently agricultural while avoiding the larger wetland basins. The areas of the site that provide habitat to wildlife are expected to be avoided. Impacts to the wetlands that may occur will be minimized per requirements of the Wetland Conservation Act and US Army Corps of Engineers and vetted through the regulatory permitting process. Mitigation for wetland impacts would occur at a 2:1 ratio. Invasive Species The site may contain some invasive species, although no site-specific information is currently available. The US Department of Agriculture's National Invasive Species Information Center provides information regarding Best Management Practices to prevent or mitigate invasive species establishment or movement. Guidance for implementation at all parcels can be referenced at httDs://www.invasivesDeciesinfo.2ov/toolkit/iDreventionbmD.shtml. Appropriate actions such as cleaning equipment, chipping/destroying invasive species, and limiting and securing soil disturbances will help prevent the spread of the invasive/noxious species. If necessary, herbicide application to page 20 pockets of weed growth could be implemented during and after construction, especially if soil particles are staged or left for future phases. d. Identify measures that will be taken to avoid, minimize, or mitigate adverse effects to fish, wildlife, plant communities, and sensitive ecological resources. The site concept plan has been designed to mostly avoid the larger wetlands on site. Additionally, buffers will be required around the wetlands. Development will convert the agricultural lands to residential development. While there are not high quality plant or wildlife resources at the site, some impact to wildlife could be anticipated due to the development as an open space converting to developed space. 14. Historic properties: Describe any historic structures, archeological sites, and/or traditional cultural properties on or in close proximity to the site. Include: 1) historic designations, 2) known artifact areas, and 3) architectural features. Attach letter received from the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO). Discuss any anticipated effects to historic properties during project construction and operation. Identify measures that will be taken to avoid, minimize, or mitigate adverse effects to historic properties. A database search request was sent to SHPO. The email received from SHPO indicated that there is a known archeological site adjacent to the eastern boundary of part of the project area (Figure 13, Appendix A). The part of the archeological site was shovel tested in 1983 and no cultural material was found. Additional research, including field survey, may be necessary to adequately assess the subject area's potential to contain archeological sites. 15. Visual: Describe any scenic views or vistas on or near the project site. Describe any project related visual effects such as vapor plumes or glare from intense lights. Discuss the potential visual effects from the project. Identify any measures to avoid, minimize, or mitigate visual effects. There are no scenic views or vistas on or near the project site. Development within the project area will be similar in nature to existing development in the area. Therefore, no visual impacts are anticipated. No vapor plumes or intense lighting will result from development of the subject parcels. 16. Air: a. Stationary source emissions - Describe the type, sources, quantities and compositions of any emissions from stationary sources such as boilers or exhaust stacks. Include any hazardous air pollutants, criteria pollutants, and any greenhouse gases. Discuss effects to air quality including any sensitive receptors, human health or applicable regulatory criteria. Include a discussion of any methods used assess the project's effect on air quality and the results of that assessment. Identify pollution control equipment and other measures that will be taken to avoid, minimize, or mitigate adverse effects from stationary source emissions. page 21 No stationary sources of emission such as boiler or stacks are anticipated with development in the area. b. Vehicle emissions - Describe the effect of the project's traffic generation on air emissions. Discuss the project's vehicle -related emissions effect on air quality. Identify measures (e.g. traffic operational improvements, diesel idling minimization plan) that will be taken to minimize or mitigate vehicle -related emissions. The EPA has identified a group of 93 compounds emitted from mobile sources that are listed in their Integrated Risk Information System. In addition, the EPA identified seven compounds with significant contributions from mobile sources that are among the national and regional -scale cancer risk drivers. These are acrolein, benzene, 1, 3 -butadiene, diesel particulate matter, plus diesel exhaust organic gases (diesel PM), formaldehyde, naphthalene, and polycyclic organic matter. While Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) considers these the priority mobile source air toxics, the list is subject to change and may be adjusted in consideration of future EPA rules. EPA rule requires controls that will dramatically decrease Mobile Source Air Toxins (MSAT) emissions through cleaner fuels and cleaner engines. According to an FHWA analysis using EPA's MOBILE6.2 model, even if vehicle activity increases as assumed, a combined reduction of 72 percent in the total annual emission rate for the priority MSAT is projected from 1999 to 2050. Air toxics analysis is a continuing area of research. While much work has been done to assess the overall health risk of air toxics, many questions remain unanswered. In particular, the tools and techniques for assessing project -specific health outcomes as a result of lifetime MSAT exposure remain limited. These limitations impede the ability to evaluate how the potential health risks posed by MSAT exposure should be factored into project -level decision-making within the context of the National Environmental Policy Act. The FHWA will continue to monitor the developing research in this emerging field. Because of the uncertainties outlined above, a quantitative assessment of the effects of air toxic emissions impacts on human health cannot be made at the project level. While available tools do allow us to reasonably predict relative emissions changes between alternatives for larger projects, the amount of MSAT emissions from each of the study scenarios and MSAT concentrations or exposures created by each of the study scenarios cannot be predicted with enough accuracy to be useful in estimating health impacts. Therefore, it is not possible to make a determination of whether any of the scenarios would have "significant adverse impacts on the human environment." This document acknowledges that the build condition may result in increased exposure to MSAT emissions in certain locations, although the concentrations and duration of exposures are uncertain, and because of this uncertainty, the health effects from these emissions cannot be estimated. Although a qualitative analysis cannot identify and measure health impacts from MSATs, it can give a basis for identifying and comparing the potential differences among MSAT emissions, if any, from the various scenarios. The qualitative assessment presented below is derived in part page 22 from a study conducted by the FHWA entitled A Methodology for Evaluating Mobile Source Air Toxic Emissions among Transportation Project Alternatives. For this EAW, the amount of MSAT emitted would be proportional to the average daily traffic (ADT). The ADT estimated for the full build condition is higher than that for the no build condition, because the project involves new development that produces additional trips. This increase in ADT means MSAT under the build scenarios would probably be higher than the no build condition in the study area. There could also be localized differences in MSAT from indirect effects of the project such as associated access traffic, emissions of evaporative MSAT (e.g., benzene) from parked cars, and emissions of diesel particulate matter from delivery trucks. Travel to other destinations would be reduced with subsequent decreases in emissions at those locations. For the build condition, emissions are virtually certain to be lower than present levels in the design year as a result of EPA's national control programs that are projected to reduce annual MSAT emissions by 72 percent from 1999 to 2050, as shown in the following graph. The magnitude of the EPA -projected reductions is so great (even after accounting for ADT growth) that MSAT emissions in the study area are likely to be lower in the future than they are today. NATIONAL MSAT EMISSION TRENDS 1999 - 2050 FOR VEHICLES OPERATING ON ROADWAYS USING EPA's MOBILE6.2 MODEL 150000 T y loomo a a -6 .L IN.0.f'H jAOI L' - 2000 2610 2020 2030 2040 2050 Calendar Year Note: (1) Annual emissions of polycyclic organic matter are projected to be 561 tons/yr for 1999, decreasing to 373 tons/yr for 2050. (2) Trends for specific locations may be different, depending on locally derived information representing vehicle -miles travelled, vehicle speeds, vehicle mix, fuels, emission control programs, meteorology, and other factors Source: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. MOBILE6.2 Model run 20 August 2009. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has designated all of Hennepin, Ramsey, and Anoka and portions of Carver, Scott, Dakota, Washington, and Wright Counties as a maintenance area for carbon monoxide. Since the EAW study area is in the portion of Wright County which is outside the carbon monoxide maintenance area, and therefore no additional analysis is required. page 23 c. Dust and odors - Describe sources, characteristics, duration, quantities, and intensity of dust and odors generated during project construction and operation. (Fugitive dust may be discussed under item 16a). Discuss the effect of dust and odors in the vicinity of the project including nearby sensitive receptors and quality of life. Identify measures that will be taken to minimize or mitigate the effects of dust and odors. During construction, particulate emissions will temporarily increase due to generation of fugitive dust. Construction dust control is required to be in conformance with City of Monticello ordinances and the NPDES Construction Stormwater permit. The construction and operation of the proposed residential development is not anticipated to involve processes that would generate odors. 17. Noise Describe sources, characteristics, duration, quantities, and intensity of noise generated during project construction and operation. Discuss the effect of noise in the vicinity of the project including 1) existing noise levels/sources in the area, 2) nearby sensitive receptors, 3) conformance to state noise standards, and 4) quality of life. Identify measures that will be taken to minimize or mitigate the effects of noise. The project site is surrounded by rural roads, farmland and residential developments. Existing noise sources are those typical of rural residential areas and consist mainly of traffic on the area roadways, which include Fallon Avenue, 851h Street, and Edmonson Avenue. It is anticipated that noise levels will temporarily increase locally during project construction but are expected to return to normal levels following project completion. Construction noise levels and types typical of construction equipment will occur as a result of this project. Construction noise will be limited to daytime hours consistent with the City of Monticello's construction working hours (7 a.m. to 7 p.m. Monday -Saturday). Construction noise will be consistent with the City of Monticello's noise ordinances (85 decibels, 7 a.m. to 10 p.m. daily). Construction equipment will be fitted with mufflers that would be maintained throughout the construction process. Table 13 summarizes the peak noise levels of common types of roadway construction equipment. Table 13. Typical Roadway Construction Equipment Noise Levels at 50 Feet Manufacturers Total Number of Peak Noise Level Equipment Type Sampled Models in Sample Range Average Backhoe 5 6 74-92 83 Front Loader 5 30 75-96 85 Dozer 8 41 65-95 85 Grader 3 15 72-92 84 Scraper 2 27 76-98 87 Pile Driver N/A N/A 95-105 101 Source: United States Environmental Protection Agency and Federal Highway Administration page 24 There are no sensitive receptors (such as hospitals) near the site which raise special concerns for further study. 18. Transportation a. Describe traffic -related aspects of project construction and operation. Include: 1) existing and proposed additional parking spaces, 2) estimated total average daily traffic generated, 3) estimated maximum peak hour traffic generated and time of occurrence, 4) indicate source of trip generation rates used in the estimates, and 5) availability of transit and/or other alternative transportation modes. See response under Section 18c and attached traffic study (Appendix Q. b. Discuss the effect on traffic congestion on affected roads and describe any traffic improvements necessary. The analysis must discuss the project's impact on the regional transportation system. If the peak hour traffic generated exceeds 250 vehicles or the total daily trips exceeds 2,500, a traffic impact study must be prepared as part of the EA W. Use the format and procedures described in the Minnesota Department of Transportation's Access Management Manual, Chapter 5 (available at. http://www.dot.state.mn.us/accessmanagementlresources.html) or a similar local guidance, See response under Section 18c and attached traffic study (Appendix Q. c. Identify measures that will be taken to minimize or mitigate project related transportation effects. The proposed Haven Ridge residential development includes 279 single family home units and 76 townhome units. The project will also include new infrastructure, such as gas, electric, telecommunications, sanitary sewer, storm sewer, watermain, streets, stormwater ponds, parking, sidewalks, trails, and streets. The project will be completed in phases with the first two phases anticipated to be completed by 2020 and the remainder as market conditions dictate. The existing site is 217 acres of primarily farmland (agricultural) located in Monticello Township (the site is proposed to be annexed into the City of Monticello with the approval of the project). The site is located from Edmonson Avenue NE to west of Fenning Avenue and north and south of 851h Street NE. The project area is bordered to the northwest by residential development, to the south by a public waters wetland, and to the west and east by farmland with scattered rural homesteads. Figures 1-4, Appendix A shows the project location and existing site plan. The estimated trip generation from the proposed Haven Ridge development is shown below in Table 14. The trip generation used to estimate the proposed site traffic is also based on rates for other similar land uses as documented in the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition. The table shows the daily, AM peak hour, and PM peak hour trip generation for the proposed site development. page 25 Table 14. Estimated Development Site Trip Generation Use Size ADT AM Peak PM Peak Total In Out Total F In I Out Total In I Out Single Family Town Homes 81 units 16 units 764 118 382 59 382 59 60 8 15 2 45 6 80 9 50 6 30 3 Total Phase 1 3192 1596 1596 243 60 183 319 201 118 and Phase 2 882 441 441 68 17 51 89 56 33 Single Family 198 units 1870 935 935 147 37 110 196 123 73 Town Homes 60 units 440 220 220 28 6 22 34 22 12 Total Phase 3 2310 1155 1155 175 43 132 230 145 1 85 Total New Trips 3192 1596 1596 243 60 183 319 201 118 Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition A Traffic Study was completed for the proposed Haven Ridge development. This study provides a comprehensive review of anticipated traffic impacts for the regional area, including the area surrounding the proposed development. The Traffic Study identifies recommended mitigation improvements at three intersections by 2030 in addition to the plan site improvement. These recommendations include: 1. Phase 1 and Phase 2 can be developed without any operational improvements (i.e., additional lanes, roundabouts, traffic signals) to the adjacent roadways or intersections studied. The adjacent street access locations should be constructed to City standards. 2. Improve Fallon Avenue to City standards from School Boulevard to 85th Street with the construction of Phase 1 and 2 of the development and 85th Street from Fallon Avenue to City limits with the completion of the future phases of the development. When determining the improvement needs (i.e., rural vs urban) the safety and drainage of the roadway should be considered. 3. By 2030 consider the construction of a traffic signal system or roundabout at the intersection of Edmonson Avenue at School Boulevard. 4. By 2030 consider the construction of a traffic signal system or roundabout at the intersection of Fenning Avenue at School Boulevard. It is understood that Wright County plans to take jurisdiction over Fenning Avenue in the next two to three years. The Traffic Study is included to respond to Item 18 of this EAW in Appendix C. page 26 19. Cumulative potential effects: (Preparers can leave this item blank if cumulative potential effects are addressed under the applicable EAW Items) a. Describe the geographic scales and timeframes of the project related environmental effects that could combine with other environmental effects resulting in cumulative potential effects. Development is anticipated to begin in 2019. No other development projects are known in the surrounding area that would interact with this project. Cumulative environmental effects from this development will not occur. b. Describe any reasonably foreseeable future projects (for which a basis of expectation has been laid) that may interact with environmental effects of the proposed project within the geographic scales and timeframes identified above. The City is not currently aware of any other specific foreseeable future projects that would result in cumulative effects from this development. There has been some interest in development adjacent to this site, but no specific projects or project proposers have been identified. c. Discuss the nature of the cumulative potential effects and summarize any other available information relevant to determining whether there is potential for significant environmental effects due to these cumulative effects. There are no know cumulative potential effects associated with this project. 20. Other potential environmental effects: If the project may cause any additional environmental effects not addressed by items 1 to 19, describe the effects here, discuss the how the environment will be affected, and identify measures that will be taken to minimize and mitigate these effects. No other potential environmental effects have been identified at this time. RGU CERTIFICATION. (The Environmental Quality Board will only accept SIGNED Environmental Assessment Worksheets for public notice in the EQB Monitor.) I hereby certify that: • The information contained in this document is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. • The EAW describes the complete project; there are no other projects, stages or components other than those described in this document, which are related to the project as connected actions or phased actions, as efined at Minnesota Rules, parts 4410.0200, subparts 9c and 60, respectively. • Copies of this FAW 4re being sent to the entire EQB distribution list. Signature ��1 Date q / W / l$ Title Df VC doy page 28 Appendix A: Figures Albs y C .11 ill Stearn j I i I I Morrison i,for, I I Kanabec ! I MiIIewLacs; _l Benton ! I I I \ I I Princerm i c �nrlr aE t, 11 I Isanti IL I �• V.d.w ,. ! Nan— ! will qle Fl+ruw I hills I Sherburne v I "!^� edin I SkfrancYa ` I a81q Lake ��•ne::elle \ Elk. Rlvll Annandala * Anoka �. I Ramsey w,dorrn C" YYapls Wks r-' Rockville Codd SptTnq -' MAO eker Pine �ti Anoka Wright I Gu7— � \\�•n ❑��R.plda llri. L.,k-' I l ( fdapl•r+ovr p r e,.•; fy r t lxr- ! Meund View CtkgtoUJO cock}or•1 ! II I 1� Hennepin ! Ramsey I F4ilnnEjl1)0i5 bi r?u+ ! Mwnd m a 1 I I Mfnnekllsfa ! _ _-- I j I i�thfe[d Ii1J1�, Vicuna I E6 $ - waconla / MwdGM}Ire _f McLeod ! Carver ' ' Ea•d.,n sloor�/.,rat, j Glencoe I I I I I Sibley rlri- A1Ejngton J" Figure 1:Project Location -A County Location Mantieello Haven Ridge Development EAW City of Monticello, MN iBnrn:�Flle Am ie Valley Prl of Lake 4 Dak E6rdan Scott I L_—_� K County Boundaries Project Location (217 ac.) . N 0 ■ 10 WSB Miles 1 inch = 10 miles K IS +Gre'e! Pis ■ ' Gra, 14 21 ON 23 Ta Ir r. � o � ]wry r• N P Q 0 p { a V las o •—low to 4 Q �• 7 � � F Project Area (217 ac.) I Figure 2:Project Location - USGS Topographic Map N I�anti�ello Haven Ridge Development EAW o soo WB Feet City of Monticello, MN 1 finch -- 2,000 feet ML I A. 4p "V JW N V. . � w �riw� — a, iR mai w i y I CITY OF MONTICELLO `` R1 RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT .*�jF oGC l WL' r. SV ------ '-T r ,ac�c:.Y.r:araai. � J L ' Ir-c-rn rn PARK FLnWR PHASE TOWNSHIP NERVE i � I Ir i wi �w m W 1` — — ` — PHASE ''—FUTURE _I O 0 ti v MONTI( u~r 6, r 1 rt� PHASE Z ,y .r FUTURE - °�' PHASE I = = w � � � � � = zbrj�--- K— Figure 4b:Site Plan N Man ticeH0 Haven Ridge Development EAW o City of Monticello, MN ui:P:.11 AGRICU I" Project Area (217 ac) I A 650 WSB Feet 1 inch = 650 feet � I i wi �w m W l I < wi L 6, r 1 rt� PHASE Z ,y .r FUTURE - °�' PHASE I = = w � � � � � = zbrj�--- K— Figure 4b:Site Plan N Man ticeH0 Haven Ridge Development EAW o City of Monticello, MN ui:P:.11 AGRICU I" Project Area (217 ac) I A 650 WSB Feet 1 inch = 650 feet 85th St NE --- - J':' u Project Area (217 ac.) CityBoundary Parcels Land Use Description Agricultural Manufactured Home Park Park Platted Single Family Residential Public Single Family Residential Townhome n Figure 5:Existing Land Use N A 'AM ariticello Haven Ridge Development EAW 0 800 WSB �� City of Monticello, MN mmmmmmE==== Feet 1 inch = 800 feet 85th St NE I L J CityBoundary Project Area (217 ac.) Parcels Zoning Classification R-1 (Low Residential Densities) R-3 (High Residential Densities) M -H R-3 (High Residential Densities) General Agriculture Figure 7:Existing Zoning A ' ' N 'AM ariticello Haven Ridge Development EAW WSB 0 800 �� City of Monticello, MN mmmmmmE==== Feet 1 inch = 800 feet W 73796 1368 1377B 1015 .r 406 1975 13776 73778 M 375 � 7B- J.362B 109 114 1975 UL �• IONIM L go 1 9w@ I�1 fl�qw SD@ ��. 410 9Q�3 f�0 L5 Fm; Wright CountVSoil Survey Map Symbol Soil Name Percent Slope - ' 1037 Eckvoll loamv fine sand. mav>25, Oto 3 percent slopes 0%to 3% 1O6C2 Lesterloam,6to 12 Percent slopes, eroded 6%'012% IOW2 Lester am, 12to 18 percent slopes, eroded 12%to 18% 1080 Klossner, Okoboii, and GI encoe so! Is, Ponded, O to 1 perce rt slopes 0%t01% I� �'�— _ 109 Cordova clay loam, O to 2 pe rcent sl opes 0%t02%; 1110 Isan sandv loam, Oto 2 Percent slopes 0%to- 114 o 2% 114 Gla race clay loam, de Pressi0nal, O to 1 percent slopes 0%,01% 11C.VUU t• 1224 Hubbard-Verndale. acid substratum, complex. O to 3 percent slopes 0%to 3% - r 13626 Angus loam, 2 to 5 Pe rce rt sl apes 2%to5% 1368 Southhavenloam, Oto2percentslopes 0%to2% 13771 Dorset -Two lin complex, 2106 Pe rcent sl ones 2% to 6% 1377[ Dorset -Two Almomescompleto4Pie2Pe ertslotslopes 6%tp12% `+ Project Area (217 ac.) 13798 Dorset -Al percent slopes 1%ta4% - 13886 Tamil loam, moderately wet.2to 6jP�ecentslopes 2% to 6% t1v.:Jul=/ 14380"'amloamyfinesand,moderatelvwet, 2to5percentslopes 2% to 5% Erodible Soil Classification 1901: Angus -Le Sueur compl ex, l to 5 Pe rcent sl ones 1%t05% 1942 Faradamucky loam, depressi—al,0to1percent slopes 0%to1% Wright County Soil Survey 1975 Ovlen sandv loam. Oto 2 percent slopes to 2% 1'- 260 Duelm lOamV sand, Ot02percent slopes 0%,02% 1 375 Fomdalpam,oto2percentslopes 0%to2% Highly Erodible Land I 406 Dorset sandv l oam, O 102 nt rce nt slopes 0% to 2% _ ., -- 441 Alm— am,Oto2percentslopes 0%to2% iLO Potential Highly Erodible Land W water] Q Figure 8:Soil Survey ofA■ Wright County N Monticello_ Haven Ridge Development EAW 0 900 WSB `J Cit of Monticello, MN Feet City 1 inch = 900 feet NM Figure 9:Surface Water Resources N Monticello Haven Ridge Development EAW 0 2,000 WSB Cit of Monticello, MN Feet City 1 inch = 2,000 feet law J Figure 10:Well Locations and Groundwater Resources N ontieello Haven Ridge Development EAW 0 1,000 WSB Cit of Monticello, MNA Feet City 1 inch = 1,000 feet Ak Wk -�, 00609694 ` 1 1 1 ` 1 1 ` 1 r 1 i r 00136613, 1 1 1 � � 00602817 00438486 1 00189707 1 ' 1 ' 1 00523950 1 1FOG y i�j A 1 1 1 ' 1 1 1 ' 1 00662223 1 " 1 1 C) A, 1 ------------------ ----------------♦ . 1 00789748 1 1 � 1 � � 1 1 1 1 1 ' 1 1 00488359 1 1 1 1 Project Area (217 ac.) 500Ft Buffer 1 1 1 Wells DNR Depth to Water Table 00650978 Depth (ft.) - 00752572 - `. _ _ _ . ♦ ♦ 0 0-10 >10-20 00597486 00574794 >20-30 >30-40 >40-50 00429179 00762764 ,�,� >50 water J Figure 10:Well Locations and Groundwater Resources N ontieello Haven Ridge Development EAW 0 1,000 WSB Cit of Monticello, MNA Feet City 1 inch = 1,000 feet a9tr st HF L c:v J Diamond Or m a� 3 N W C L d c '� Z° ` �PI--40 Figure 11:Potential Contamination Areas N ■ ontieello Haven Ridge Development EAW 0 800 WSB Cit of Monticello, MN Feet City 1 inch = 800 feet U d n ■ ■ VVV • ■ ■ 37054 ■ rr'. 136269 77 3595777 i ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■7 1~30446' 217032 • ■ ■ • r 1 ■ MUM ■ ■ 53398 ■ . ■ 16608 ■ 58100 ■ � ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ LJ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ @a mg Project Area (217 ac.) ■ Is■ �,■■r 500Ft Buffer ��• ■ ■ • • • •v�• What's My Neighborhood Results ■ ■ ■ 0 ■ ■ � ■. ■ ■ �♦♦� ❑ Feedlot Hazardous Waste Multiple Activities Figure 11:Potential Contamination Areas N ■ ontieello Haven Ridge Development EAW 0 800 WSB Cit of Monticello, MN Feet City 1 inch = 800 feet U d n Q Cobble 5<°�gG f c��3 Diamond Dr o O N C O E Park Dr agtr St HF w ams E �Qa * i► Y a Ave z 10 a) LU > rr Q 41 o LL m 8 k6 ofi �r rF �ZF Q d d 15th St NE 1 LU z a; Q ` o; ' of E. �i w Z Q m m N W Project Area (217 ac.) Minne - • • Cover Classification 79th St NEimpervious ti Cropland Wooded/Forest Wetlan ••-• • - • Brush/Grassland il.�• Y D--• Figure 12:Minnesota Land Cover Classification System (MLCCS) N L ontieello Haven Ridge Development EAW 0 800 WSB Cit of Monticello, MN Feet City 1 inch = 800 feet w z a c 0 N C O E agtr St HF w L_ V f M W w Diamond Drp M 52 Park Dr IZ A* Monticello W Z d Q U) d N W 79th St NE J Project Area (217 ac.) O SHPO archaeological site (approximate location) Figure 13: Historical Sites N L Haven Ridge Development EAW 0 800 WSB Cit of Monticello, MN Feet City 1 inch = 800 feet x C 3 x n Appendix B: Agency Correspondence Laura Wehr From: MN_MNIT_Data Request SHPO <DataReq uestSHPO@state.mn.us> Sent: Friday, August 17, 2018 3:50 PM To: Laura Wehr Subject: RE: Data Request Monticello Township, Wright County Attachments: WrightArchaeology.xls THIS EMAIL IS NOT A PROJECT CLEARANCE This information has recently been updated, please read the note below carefully. This message simply reports the results of the cultural resources database search you requested. The database search produced results for only previously known archaeological sites and historic properties. No historic structures were identified in a search of the Minnesota Archaeological Inventory and Historic and Architectural Inventory for the search area requested. A report containing the archaeological sites identified is attached. The result of this database search provides a listing of recorded archaeological sites and historic/architectural properties that are included in the current MN SHPO databases. Because the majority of archaeological sites in the state and many historic/architectural properties have not been recorded, important sites or properties may exist within the search area and may be affected by development projects within that area. Additional research, including field survey, may be necessary to adequately assess the area's potential to contain historic properties. Properties that are listed in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) or have been determined eligible for listing in the NRHP are indicated on the reports you have received. The following codes on the reports you received are: NR - National Register listed. The properties may be individually listed or may be within the boundaries of a National Register District. CEF - Considered Eligible Findings are made when a federal agency has recommended that a property is eligible for listing in the National Register and MN SHPO has accepted the recommendation for the purposes of the Review and Compliance Process. There properties need to be further assessed before they are officially listed in the National Register. SEF - Staff eligible Findings are those properties the MN SHPO staff considers eligible for listing in the National Register, in circumstances other than the Review and Compliance process. I DOE - Determination of Eligibility is made by the National Park Service and are those properties that are eligible for listing in the National Register, but have not been officially listed. CNEF - Considered Not Eligible Findings are made during the course of a Review and Compliance process. For the purposes of the review a property is considered not eligible for listing in the National Register. These properties may need to be reassessed for eligibility under additional or alternate contexts. Properties without NR, CEF, SEF, DOE, or CNEF designations in the reports you received may not have been evaluated and therefore no assumption to their eligibility can be made. Integrity and contexts change over time, therefore any eligibility determination made ten (10) or more years for the date of the current survey are considered out of date and the property will need to be reassessed. If you require a comprehensive assessment of a project's potential to impact archaeological sites or historic/architectural properties, you may need to hire a qualified archaeologist and/or historian. If you need assistance with a project review, please contact Kelly Gragg-Johnson in Review and Compliance @ 651-201-3285 or by email at kelly.araaaiohnson(cbstate.mn.us. The Minnesota SHPO Survey Manuals and Database Metadata can be found at httDS://mn.ciov/admin/shoo/identification-evaluation/ MN SHPO research hours are 8:30 AM - 4:00 PM Tuesday -Friday. Please call ahead at 651- 201-3295 to ensure staff is available to assist you, if necessary. The Office is closed on Mondays. DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION STATE t.-SrORIc PR, :E n+ATiON CF= C'_ SHPO Data Requests Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office 50 Sherburne Avenue, Suite 203 Saint Paul, MN 55155 (651) 201-3295 datarequestshi)o(a�state.mn.us From: Laura Wehr <Iwehr@wsbeng.com> Sent: Monday, August 13, 2018 8:25 AM To: MN_MNIT_Data Request SHPO <DataReq uestSHPO@state.mn.us> Subject: Data Request Monticello Township, Wright County Hello, Could you please send me any historical information for the area within and around a project site in the Monticello Township, Wright County? Attached are two location maps. The project area is in 523, 524, and S26 of T121, R25. Thank you, Laura Wehr Environmental Scientist P (763) 762-28331 M (612) 749-5816 WSB & Associates, Inc. 1 701 Xenia Avenue South, Suite 300 1 Minneapolis, MN 55416 WWqN iNIREM i� -.A This email, and any files transmitted with it, is confidential and is intended solely for the use of the addressee. If you are not the addressee, please delete this email from your system. Any use of this email by unintended recipients is strictly prohibited. WSB does not accept liability for any errors or omissions which arise as a result of electronic transmission. If verification is required, please request a hard copy. Appendix C: Traffic Impact Study I Monft*ceflo HAVEN RIDGE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC STUDY MONTICELLO, MN September 14, 2018 Prepared for: City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street Monticello, MN 55362 WSB PROJECT NO. 12471-000 rte. YY SB Haven Ridge Development Traffic Study For: MonticeTY llo City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street Monticello, MN 55362 September 14, 2018 Prepared By: WSB & Associates, Inc. 701 Xenia Ave. South, Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN, 55416 (763) 541-4800 (763) 541-1700 (Fax) HAVEN RIDGE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC STUDY CITY OF MONTICELLO WSB PROJECT NO. 12471-000 CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly registered professional engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Charles T. Rickart, P.E. Date: September 14, 2018 Reg. No. 26082 HAVEN RIDGE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC STUDY CITY OF MONTICELLO WSB PROJECT NO. 12471-000 PAGE Table of Contents INTRODUCTION / BACKGROUND................................................................................3 EXISTING CONDITIONS................................................................................................ 6 TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS.............................................................................................. 9 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS.....................................................................................17 CONCLUSIONS / RECOMMENDATIONS................................................................... 22 Figures / Tables Figure1 - Location Map................................................................................................4 Figure 2 — Haven Ridge Site Plan................................................................................. 5 Figure 3 — Existing AM and PM Peak Hour Traffic ...................................................... 8 Figure 4 — No -Build 2020 AM and PM Peak Hour Traffic .......................................... 11 Figure 5 — No -Build 2030 AM and PM Peak Hour Traffic .......................................... 12 Figure 6 — Build 2020 AM and PM Peak Hour Traffic ........................................... 13,14 Figure 7 — Build 2030 AM and PM Peak Hour Traffic ........................................... 15,16 Figure 8 — Level of Service Ranges........................................................................... 17 Table 1 — Site Development Traffic Generation........................................................ 10 Table 2 — Existing Level of Service Summary.......................................................... 19 Table 3 — 2020 No -Build Level of Service Summary ................................................. 19 Table 4 — 2030 No Build Level of Service Summary ................................................. 20 Table 5 — 2020 Build Level of Service Summary ...................................................... 20 Table 6 — 2030 Build Level of Service Summary ...................................................... 21 HAVEN RIDGE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC STUDY CITY OF MONTICELLO WSB PROJECT NO. 12471-000 PAGE ii INTRODUCTION / BACKGROUND The purpose of this study is to determine the potential traffic impacts the proposed Haven Ridge residential development will have on the adjacent roadway system. The existing 217 -acre site is located in Monticello Township and is proposed to be annexed into the City of Monticello with the approval of the project. The site is located from Edmonson Avenue NE to west of Fenning Avenue and north and south of 85th Street NE. The project location is shown on Figure 1. The proposed Haven Ridge residential development includes 279 single family home units and 76 townhome units. The project will also include new infrastructure, such as gas, electric, telecommunications, sanitary sewer, storm sewer, water, streets, stormwater ponds, parking, sidewalks, trails, and streets. The project will be completed in phases with the first two phases anticipated to be completed by 2020 and the remainder as market conditions dictate. The proposed site plan is shown in Figure 2. The traffic impacts of the existing roadway system and proposed development were evaluated at the following locations. • Edmonson Ave at School Blvd • Edmonson Ave at 85th St • Edmonson Ave at Site Entrance (with development) • Edmonson Ave at CR 37 • Fallon Ave at School Blvd • Fallon Ave at Farmstead Ave / Site Entrance (with development) • Fallon Ave at 87th St / Site Entrance (with development) • Fallon Ave at Townhome Site Entrance (with development) • Fallon Ave / Eisele Ave south at 85th St / Site Entrance (with development) • 85th St at Eisele Ave north / Site Entrance (with development) • 85th St at Site Entrance (with development) • Fenning Ave at School Blvd • Fenning Ave at 85th St The following sections of this report document the analysis and anticipated impacts of the proposed Meadows North development. HAVEN RIDGE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC STUDY CITY OF MONTICELLO WSB PROJECT NO. 12471-000 PAGE 3 4751 SCALE IN FEET 0 1000 2001 94 INL. - 4 dw •_ •;-�[fi �. �� .. r* "�'1 }so ■ impy .fir r.+. �- --- School 8ouleva+d y W v "' 18 H pp 'E r/Mg. .Project Location r 4 u �� t•+.�}yam SCALE IN FEET Y i 1.r, / 500 101 r Pebbiehrook OC r w •Fakorillre•�,, k ,r r 5thrling Dr, ' � � F - °-meg' • ►-� � r ; -�. `. .s,' r r "hrl. 4 r4l, w F N o >� 871h St MF . _� '••dry QGCQO�r 40, A� 65tM1 51 NE �wl• � W � p�►4o�° �+►�' Ex 6 go x 6 " • + r EXISTING CONDITIONS A. Roadway Characteristics School Boulevard: School Boulevard is an east/west City of Monticello 2 -lane Major Collector roadway. Left and/or right turn lanes are provided at most intersections. The posted speed limit on School Boulevard is 40 mph. The existing 2017 Average Daily Traffic (ADT) on School Boulevard ranges from 6,000 vehicles per day (vpd) west of Fallon Avenue to 6,800 vpd east of Fallon Avenue. Edmonson Avenue (CR 117): Edmonson Avenue is a north/south 2 -lane local roadway. The City has jurisdiction within city limits north of 87th Street NE with Monticello Township having jurisdiction south of 87th St NE. Primary access on Edmonson Avenue in the area adjacent to the site is from local streets and driveways. The posted speed limit on Edmonson Avenue is 45 mph north of 85th Street and 55 mph south of 85th Street. The existing 2017 ADT on Edmonson Avenue ranges from 2,400vpd north of 85th Street to 2,250vpd south of 85th Avenue. Fallon Avenue: Fallon Avenue is a north/south 2 -lane local City street. Fallon Avenue south of School Boulevard to the City limits has a posted 30 mph speed limit. South of the City limit the roadway narrows to a 22 -foot width with no posted speed limit (assumed to be 55 mph). Fallon Avenue ends where it turns on 85th Street. The existing 2017 ADT on Fallon Avenue is 1,100vpd south of School Boulevard. Fallon Avenue received a bituminous overlay in 2015. 85th Street: 85th Street is an east/west 2 -lane local township and city street. Monticello Township has jurisdiction of 85th Street between Edmonson Avenue and Eisele Ave NE and the City has jurisdiction of 85th Street between Eisele Ave and Fallon Avenue within City Limits. It is understood that the current Township jurisdiction of 85th Street will become the City's with the annexation approval. 85th Street ends where it turns on Fallon Avenue. The existing 2017 ADT on 85th Street is 910vpd east of Edmonson Avenue. 85th Street, within the City limits, received a bituminous overlay in 2015. The lane configurations at each of the primary intersections is outlined below. Edmonson Ave at School Blvd — All Way Stop Control SB Edmonson Ave — one left/through/right WB School Blvd — one left, one through/right NB Edmonson Ave — one left/through/right EB School Blvd — one left, one through/right Edmonson Ave at 85th St - Side Street Stop Control SB Edmonson Ave — one right/through/left WB 85th St — one right/through/left NB Edmonson Ave - one right/through/left EB 85th St — one right/through/left HAVEN RIDGE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC STUDY CITY OF MONTICELLO WSB PROJECT NO. 12471-000 PAGE 6 Edmonson Ave at CR 37 - Side Street Stop Control SB Edmonson Ave — one right/through/left WB CR 37 — one by-pass lane, one through/left NB Edmonson Ave - one right/through/left EB CR 37 — one right, one through/left Fallon Ave at School Blvd — All Way Stop Control SB Fallon Ave — one left/through/right WB School Blvd — one left, one through/right NB Fallon Ave — one left/through/right EB School Blvd — one left, one through/right Fenning Ave at School Blvd/CR 18 (Jason Avenue) — All Way Stop Control SB Fenning Ave — one left/through, one right WB CR 18 — one left/through, one right NB Fenning Ave — one left/through/right EB School Blvd — one left, one through/right Fenning Ave at 8511 St - Side Street Stop Control SB Fenning Ave — one right/through/left NB Fenning Ave - one right/through/left EB 85th St — one right/through/left The existing roadway geometrics including the intersection traffic control, is shown on Figure 3. B. Traffic Volumes Traffic volume data was obtained from the City of Monticello and Wright County along with traffic counts conducted by WSB & Associates, Inc. during the week of August 131h, 2018. Traffic volume data was collected for the Average Daily Traffic, AM peak hour and PM peak hour. The existing 2018 average daily traffic volume and 2018 peak hour counts are illustrated on Figure 3. HAVEN RIDGE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC STUDY CITY OF MONTICELLO WSB PROJECT NO. 12471-000 PAGE 7 w 6200 6$DQ N 146 (2471 0 0 P 48 (621 __ ti ;: ;:T 133 (1981 Q c, A- 786 )411] J 1" M 13 f91 + r 16 (501 (258)276 } "f' (8)5 (138)197 V g m m (289)152 -r M N R 119} 19 1x (42) 26 G N w a _ 36 (23) -- 196 (467) + 14 (37) Q (7) 8 y + N 30 Z' �_ 1318) 2Ln a (33) B N N + 21 {2s1 + 17 {10) 4 (6)7 + 111]3 (32) 11 + m (1j s 117 123 (199) + 29 (561 + LEGEND N (1017 m (1641135 v XX 2018 Existing ADT A f1513fi t F Lane Configuration AM (PM) Turning Movement Voiume 4 ~ Stop -Controlled Approach PTY 0- Haven Ridge Development EAW Figure 3 WSB �%nt1CC110 Traffic Study 2018 Existing Volumes City of Monticello 0 HAVEN RIDGE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC STUDY CITY OF MONTICELLO WSB PROJECT NO. 12471-000 PAGE 8 TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS In order to analyze the lane configuration and traffic control needs projected traffic volumes were determined for the area. Traffic forecasts were prepared for the year 2020 which is the year after the proposed first two phases of the development are anticipated to be completed and; for the 2030 conditions which represents the full build condition of the site. The following sections outline the traffic generation, as well as the traffic distribution and projected traffic volumes. A. Background (Non -Development) Traffic Growth Traffic growth in the vicinity of a proposed site will occur between existing conditions (2018) and any given future year due to other development within the region. This background growth must be accounted for and included in future year traffic forecasts. Reviewing the historical traffic counts in the area, traffic has stayed somewhat constant or dropped in the past few years. The current County State Aid traffic projection factor is 1.5 over a 20 -year period. This factor was used to project traffic to the 2020 and 2030 analysis years. This represents approximately a 2%/year growth. The traffic changes as the result of the new Fallon Avenue overpass will not have significant impacts on the intersections adjacent to the proposed development. In this case the future traffic volumes would not change or would be slightly reduced. Therefore, the analysis would be considered a worst-case condition. B. Proposed Site Trip Generation The estimated trip generation from the proposed Haven Ridge development project is shown below in Table 1. The trip generation used to estimate the proposed site traffic is based on rates for other similar land uses as documented in the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, 1011 Edition. The table shows the daily, AM peak hour and PM peak hour trip generation for the proposed site development. C. Traffic Distribution Site -generated trips were distributed to the adjacent roadway system based on the anticipated origins and destinations for specific land use and existing travel patterns. The generated trips for the proposed Haven Ridge development were assumed to arrive or exit the site using new access locations on Fallon Avenue for phase 1 and 2 and on Fallon Avenue, 851h Street and Edmonson Avenue at full development. Based on these parameters the following general traffic distribution was used to distribute the projected traffic volumes from the anticipated uses: • 80% to/from the north • 5% to/from the east • 5% to/from the south • 10% to/from the west HAVEN RIDGE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC STUDY CITY OF MONTICELLO WSB PROJECT NO. 12471-000 PAGE 9 D. Projected Traffic Volumes The traffic forecasts were prepared by adding the projected annual background traffic growth to the existing 2018 traffic counts to determine the "No -Build" traffic conditions. The anticipated site development traffic was then added to the no -build to determine the "Build" traffic conditions. Figures 4-7 shows the projected 2020 and 2030 No - Build and Build AM peak hour and PM peak hour traffic volumes. Table 1 - Develoament Site Trio Generation Use Size ADT AM Peak PM Peak Total In Out Total T17n Out Total In Out Single Family 81 units 764 382 382 60 15 45 80 50 30 Town Homes 16 units 118 59 59 8 2 6 9 6 3 Total Phase 1 and Phase 2 882 441 441 68 17 51 89 56 33 Single Family 198 units 1870 935 935 147 37 110 196 123 73 Town Homes 60 units 440 220 220 28 6 22 34 22 12 Total Phase 3 2310 1155 1155 1 175 43 1 132 230 145 85 Total New Trips 3192 1596 1596 1 243 60 183 1 319 201 118 Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition HAVEN RIDGE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC STUDY CITY OF MONTICELLO WSB PROJECT NO. 12471-000 PAGE 10 E _ 50 (64] v M 1931427} M w -}- 17 (52} r 19} 5 y + � `" O 144127 C} 950 O M N 6450 10 {91 M r; + 22 (27) + 18 (10) P)7 + M (33j 11 + n a w (5122 W _ 37 (24) n 204 (486) r 14 (381 {7] 8 + 1331} 239 Z' M a P v w � (34} 8 0 R1 M 218} wRiGnr sr. > `r 128 {2071 117 M couNir + 30 {581 (1017 + LEGEND N 1171 }140 n A X M 13r XX 2020 No Build ADT ;1s ' -- f Lane Configuration AM (PM) Turning Movement Volume + I' Stop -Controlled Approach ITY OF Haven Ridge Development EAW Figure 4 f: WSB �4ntic�llo Traffic Study 2020 No Build Volumes City of Monticello HAVEN RIDGE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC STUDY CITY OF MONTICELLO WSB PROJECT NO. 12471-000 PAGE 11 a 15212521 p Lr) ry r 138(206) M J �` 13(91 08) 287 s + {144} 205 V ti � ti & Fi 120120 0 37 (24) n 204 (486) r 14 (381 {7] 8 + 1331} 239 Z' M a P v w � (34} 8 0 R1 M 218} wRiGnr sr. > `r 128 {2071 117 M couNir + 30 {581 (1017 + LEGEND N 1171 }140 n A X M 13r XX 2020 No Build ADT ;1s ' -- f Lane Configuration AM (PM) Turning Movement Volume + I' Stop -Controlled Approach ITY OF Haven Ridge Development EAW Figure 4 f: WSB �4ntic�llo Traffic Study 2020 No Build Volumes City of Monticello HAVEN RIDGE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC STUDY CITY OF MONTICELLO WSB PROJECT NO. 12471-000 PAGE 11 )(X 1 2030 No Build ADT xi t r -ane Configuration -..srning Movement Volume Stop -Controlled Approach riry OF Haven Ridge Development EAW Figure 5 WSB Monticello Traffic Study 2030 No Build Volumes City of Monticello HAVEN RIDGE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC STUDY CITY OF MONTICELLO WSB PROJECT NO. 12471-000 PAGE 12 1030 W HIGH 1 117 J 6800 7100 I ` 152 {252j 140 13 (9) m 12741297 + 11aay211 z - c p {2a) 20 37 (24) r ! A- 204 (466) + r 19 (5fil M8 n m v (331)239 Z' Q {60} 1fi V V M N N Oa 14 {11) i Q + 22 (27) 11113 4 + 25 (141 0)7 + 111 v {33} 11 m (5} 22 1 [ouNrr 2(8) T 126(207) LEGEND N +30 (56) {16),0 +� xx 1 2020 Build ADT (,71) 140 1 t F Lane Configuration (16)37 ' AM (PM) Tu rn i ng M ove me nt Vol u me CStop -Controlled Approach I i Y (] F Haven Ridge Development EAW Figure Ba [ WSB Monticello Traffic Study Existing Intersections City of Monticello 2020 Build Volumes HAVEN RIDGE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC STUDY CITY OF MONTICELLO WSB PROJECT NO. 12471-000 PAGE 13 56(70) _ M w n 211 1437) + r 17 (52) (8) 5 a + (321) 164 -r = m a Q (44) 27 u'1 4 1030 W HIGH 1 117 J 6800 7100 I ` 152 {252j 140 13 (9) m 12741297 + 11aay211 z - c p {2a) 20 37 (24) r ! A- 204 (466) + r 19 (5fil M8 n m v (331)239 Z' Q {60} 1fi V V M N N Oa 14 {11) i Q + 22 (27) 11113 4 + 25 (141 0)7 + 111 v {33} 11 m (5} 22 1 [ouNrr 2(8) T 126(207) LEGEND N +30 (56) {16),0 +� xx 1 2020 Build ADT (,71) 140 1 t F Lane Configuration (16)37 ' AM (PM) Tu rn i ng M ove me nt Vol u me CStop -Controlled Approach I i Y (] F Haven Ridge Development EAW Figure Ba [ WSB Monticello Traffic Study Existing Intersections City of Monticello 2020 Build Volumes HAVEN RIDGE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC STUDY CITY OF MONTICELLO WSB PROJECT NO. 12471-000 PAGE 13 rn 24 (16) � n }" 5 I31 (14) 18 `i" 11� • N , f v1 ._ (4)6 71 1 F Lane Configuration N AM (PM) Turning Movement Volume QStop -Controlled Approach Haven Ridge Development EAW Figure 5b CITY OF WSB `' Monticello Traffic Study New I ntersectlons City of Monticello 2026 Build Volumes HAVEN RIDGE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC STUDY CITY OF MONTICELLO WSB PROJECT NO. 12471-000 PAGE 14 XX 1 2030 Build ADT TF Lane Configuration AM (PM) Turning Movement Volume i Stop -Controlled Approach Haven Ridge Development EAW Figure 7a [ iTWSBMoni��e�0 Traffic Study Existing Intersections City of Monticello 2030 Build Volumes HAVEN RIDGE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC STUDY CITY OF MONTICELLO WSB PROJECT NO. 12471-000 PAGE 15 Lane Configuration AM (PM) Turning Movement Volume (1iY OF Haven Ridge Development EAW Figure 76 WSB Monticello Traffic Study New Intersections City of Monticello 2030 Build Volumes HAVEN RIDGE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC STUDY CITY OF MONTICELLO WSB PROJECT NO. 12471-000 PAGE 16 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Existing and/or forecasted traffic operations were evaluated for the key impacted intersections adjacent to the proposed site. This section describes the methodology used to assess the operations and provides a summary of traffic operations for each analysis year. A. Methodology The traffic operations analysis is derived from established methodologies documented in the Highway Capacity Manual 2000 (HCM). The HCM provides a series of analysis techniques that are used to evaluate traffic operations. Intersections are given a Level of Service (LOS) grade from "A" to "F" to describe the average amount of control delay per vehicle as defined in the HCM. The LOS is primarily a function of peak traffic hour turning movement volumes, intersection lane configuration, and the traffic controls at the intersection. LOS A is the best traffic operating condition, and drivers experience minimal delay at an intersection operating at that level. LOS E represents the condition where the intersection is at capacity. LOS F represents a condition where there is more traffic than can be handled by the intersection, and many vehicle operators may have to wait through more than one green phase to make it through the intersection. At a stop sign -controlled intersection, LOS F would be characterized by exceptionally long vehicle queues on each approach at an all -way stop, or long queues and/or great difficulty in finding an acceptable gap for drivers on the minor legs at a through -street intersection. The LOS ranges for both signalized and un -signalized intersections are shown in Figure 8. The threshold LOS values for un -signalized intersections are slightly less than for signalized intersections. This variance was instituted because drivers' expectations at intersections differ with the type of traffic control. A given LOS can be altered by increasing (or decreasing) the number of lanes, changing traffic control arrangements, adjusting the timing at signalized intersections, or other lesser geometric improvements. LOS also changes as traffic volumes increase or decrease. Figure 8 - Level of Service Ranges for Signalized and Un -signalized Intersections _ u 80 v d u LOS E ^ t d 55 ° °1 d ° s 50 a LOS D > -o a LOS E 35 y a 35 a LOS C o LOS D a 5 25 20 5 `o LOS C LOS B Z 15 U 10 0 10 LOS B - LOS A LOSA LOS Z Signalized Intersection Unsignalized Intersection SOURCE- Level of Service IM1resM1olds from tM1e HigM1way Capacity Manual, 2000 HAVEN RIDGE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC STUDY CITY OF MONTICELLO WSB PROJECT NO. 12471-000 PAGE 17 LOS, as described above, can also be determined for the individual legs (sometimes referred to as "approaches") or lanes (turn lanes in particular) of an intersection. It should be noted that a LOS E or F might be acceptable or justified in those cases where a leg(s) or lane(s) has a very low traffic volume as compared to the volume on the other legs. For example, improving LOS on such low-volume legs by converting a two-way stop condition to an all -way stop, or adjusting timing at a signalized intersection, could result in a significant penalty for the many drivers on the major road while benefiting the few on the minor road. Also, geometric improvements on minor legs, such as additional lanes or longer turn lanes, could have limited positive effects and might be prohibitive in terms of benefit to cost. Although LOS A represents the best possible level of traffic flow, the cost to construct roadways and intersection to such a high standard often exceeds the benefit to the user. Funding availability might also lead to acceptance of intersection or roadway designs with a lower LOS. LOS D is generally accepted as the lowest acceptable level in urban areas. LOS C is often considered to be the desirable minimum level for rural areas. LOS D or E may be acceptable for limited durations or distances, or for very low-volume legs of some intersections. The LOS analysis was performed using Synchro/SimTraffic: Synchro, a software package that implements Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) methodologies, was used to build each signalized intersection and provide an input database for turning -movement volumes, lane geometrics, and signal design and timing characteristics. In addition, Synchro was used to optimize signal timing parameters for future conditions. Output from Synchro is transferred to SimTraffic, the traffic simulation model. SimTraffic is a micro -simulation computer modeling software that simulates each individual vehicle's characteristics and driver behavior in response to traffic volumes, intersection configuration, and signal operations. The model simulates drivers' behaviors and responses to surrounding traffic flow as well as different vehicle types and speeds. It outputs estimated vehicle delay and queue lengths at each intersection being analyzed. B. Existing Level of Service Summary Table 2, below, summarizes the existing LOS at the primary intersections in the study area based on the current lane geometry, traffic control and 2018 traffic volumes. The table shows that all intersections are operating at an overall LOS B or better during the AM and PM peak hour with all movements operating at LOS C or better. HAVEN RIDGE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC STUDY CITY OF MONTICELLO WSB PROJECT NO. 12471-000 PAGE 18 Table 2 — Existing (2018) Level of Service Edmonson Ave at School Blvd Edmonson Ave at 85th St Edmonson Ave at CR 37 Fallon Ave at School Blvd Fenning Ave at School Blvd Fenning Ave at 85th St C = Overall LOS, (D) = Worst movement LOS A (A) 9 AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Intersection A (A) 6 A(A) 5 A(B) 7 A (B) 9 A (B) LOS Delay LOS Delay A (A) 2 A (A) (sec/veh) Source: WSB & Associates, Inc. (sec/veh) Edmonson Ave at School Blvd Edmonson Ave at 85th St Edmonson Ave at CR 37 Fallon Ave at School Blvd Fenning Ave at School Blvd Fenning Ave at 85th St C = Overall LOS, (D) = Worst movement LOS A (A) 9 B (C) 14 A (A) 4 A (A) 6 A(A) 5 A(B) 7 A (B) 9 A (B) 12 A (B) 10 B (C) 14 A (A) 2 A (A) 2 Source: WSB & Associates, Inc. (sec/veh) C. Forecasted Traffic Operations A capacity and LOS analysis was completed for the study area intersections for 2020 which is the year the proposed phase 1 and phase 2 of the development would be completed and for the 2030 conditions which represents the full development of the site. The results of the analysis are discussed below and shown in Tables 3 - 6. Table 3 and Table 4 — Forecasted No Build, shows that with no site development and existing roadway geometrics and traffic control, all intersection will continue to operate at overall LOS C or better with all movements at LOS D or better in both the AM and PM peak hours in 2020 and in the AM peak hour in 2030. However, during the PM peak hour the intersections of Edmonson Avenue/Oakwood Drive at School Boulevard and Fenning Avenue at School Boulevard will begin to have operational issues requiring consideration of improvements. Table 3 — Forecasted 2020 No Build - Level of Service Edmonson Ave at School Blvd Edmonson Ave at 85' St Edmonson Ave at CR 37 Fallon Ave at School Blvd Fenning Ave at School Blvd Fenning Ave at 85" St C = Overall LOS, (D) = Worst movement LOS HAVEN RIDGE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC STUDY CITY OF MONTICELLO WSB PROJECT NO. 12471-000 A (A) 9 AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Intersection A (A) 7 A (B) 6 A (B) 7 A (B) 9 A (B) LOS Delay LOS Delay A (A) 2 A (A) (sec/veh) Source: WSB & Associates, Inc. (sec/veh) Edmonson Ave at School Blvd Edmonson Ave at 85' St Edmonson Ave at CR 37 Fallon Ave at School Blvd Fenning Ave at School Blvd Fenning Ave at 85" St C = Overall LOS, (D) = Worst movement LOS HAVEN RIDGE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC STUDY CITY OF MONTICELLO WSB PROJECT NO. 12471-000 A (A) 9 B (C) 14 A (A) 4 A (A) 7 A (B) 6 A (B) 7 A (B) 9 A (B) 12 B (C) 11 B (D) 17 A (A) 2 A (A) 3 Source: WSB & Associates, Inc. PAGE 19 Table 4 — Forecasted 2030 No Build - Level of Service Intersection Edmonson Ave at School Blvd Edmonson Ave at 85th St Edmonson Ave at CR 37 Fallon Ave at School Blvd Fenning Ave at School Blvd Fenning Ave at 85th St C = Overall LOS, (D) = Worst movement LOS AM Peak Hour LOS Delay (sec/veh) B (B) 10 A (A) 5 A (B) 6 B (B) 12 C (D) 19 A (A) 2 Source: WSB & Associates, Inc. PM Peak Hour LOS Delay (sec/veh) C (E) 23 I A (B) 7 A (C) 9 C (D) 18 E (F) 50 A (A) 3 Table 5 and Table 6 — Forecasted Build, shows that, assuming the proposed development with the exiting lane configuration and traffic control all intersection will continue to operate at overall LOS C or better with all movements at LOS D or better in both the AM and PM peak hours in 2020. However, in 2030, during the PM peak hour the intersection of Edmonson Avenue/Oakwood Drive at School Boulevard and during the AM and PM peak hours the intersection of Fenning Avenue at School Boulevard will continue to have operational issues as identified with the no -build analysis. Table 5 — Forecasted 2020 Build - Level of Service Intersection AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour LOS Delay LOS Delay (sec/veh) (sec/veh) Edmonson Ave at School Blvd A (B) 9 C (C) 15 Edmonson Ave at 85th St A (A) 4 A (A) 7 Edmonson Ave at CR 37 A (B) 6 A (B) 7 Fallon Ave at School Blvd A (B) 9 A (B) 12 Fallon Ave at Farmstead Ave/Site Entrance #1 A (A) 1 A (A) 2 Fallon Ave at 8711 St / Site Entrance #2 A (A) 2 A (A) 2 Fallon Ave at Townhome Site Entrance #3 A (A) 2 A (A) 2 Fenning Ave at School Blvd B (C) 13 C (D) 19 Fenning Ave at 85th St A (A) 2 A (A) 3 C = Overall LOS, (D) = Worst movement LOS Source: WSB & Associates, Inc HAVEN RIDGE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC STUDY CITY OF MONTICELLO WSB PROJECT NO. 12471-000 PAGE 20 Table 6 — Forecasted 2030 Build - Level of Service Intersection Edmonson Ave at School Blvd Edmonson Ave at 85th St Edmonson Ave at Site Entrance #6 Edmonson Ave at CR 37 Fallon Ave at School Blvd Fallon Ave at Farmstead Ave/Site Entrance #1 Fallon Ave at 87th St / Site Entrance #2 Fallon Ave at Townhome Site Entrance #3 Fallon Ave at 85th St (1) 85th St at Eisele Ave No / Site Entrance #4 85th St at Site Entrance #5 Fenning Ave at School Blvd Fenning Ave at 85th St AM Peak Hour I PM Peak Hour LOS Delay I LOS Delay A (A) (sec/veh) A (A) (sec/veh) B (B) 11 E (F) 49 A (A) 5 A (B) 7 A (A) 2 A (A) 5 A (C) 7 A (C) 9 B (C) 14 C (D) 22 A (A) 2 A (A) 2 A (A) 2 A (A) 2 A (A) 2 A (A) 2 A (A) 3 A (A) 4 A (A) 2 A (A) 2 A (A) 1 A (A) 1 E (F) 40 F (F) 70 A (A) 2 A (A) 3 C = Overall LOS, (D) = Worst movement LOS Source: WSB & Associates, Inc. (1) = Assumes a single lane roundabout D. Mitigation Traffic Operations Based on the traffic operation analysis the following mitigation improvements would improve the operations at the impacted intersections in the 2030 conditions with or without the proposed development. 1. Edmonson Avenue at School Boulevard - Construct a traffic signal system or single lane roundabout. The analysis concludes that with the existing lane configuration assuming the signal or roundabout improvement the overall intersection would improve to a LOS B with all movements at LOS D or better 2. Fenning Avenue at School Boulevard - Construct a traffic signal system or single lane roundabout. The analysis concludes that with the existing lane configuration assuming the signal or roundabout improvement the overall intersection would improve to a LOS C with all movements at LOS D or better It is understood that Wright County plans to take jurisdiction over Fenning Avenue in the next 2-3 years and would be completing this improvement. HAVEN RIDGE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC STUDY CITY OF MONTICELLO WSB PROJECT NO. 12471-000 PAGE 21 3. Fallon Avenue at 85th Street — Construct a single lane roundabout. The proposed concept site plan indicates a single lane roundabout to be constructed at a realign intersection providing the primary access to the future site development and providing a future connection to Fenning Avenue to the west. The improvement is needed to accommodate the anticipated site traffic. If the development was not completed, stop controlled intersections would provide sufficient operations. The proposed improvement will provide the better operations than a stop -controlled intersection. CONCLUSIONS / RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the analysis documented in this study, the following can be concluded: The proposed site will include 279 single family homes and 86 townhomes at full development. The site will be developed in phases. The first two phases are assumed to be constructed by 2020 and will include 81 single family homes and 16 townhome units which would generate approximately 882 daily trips, 68 AM peak hour trips and 89 PM peak hour trips. The remainder of the development will be constructed as the market dictates. At full build of the site the development is anticipated to generate 3,192 daily trips, 243 AM peak hour trips and 319 PM peak hour trips. • Existing (2018) traffic operations analysis, based on the current lane geometry and traffic control, indicates that all intersections are operating at an overall LOS B or better during the AM peak hour and PM peak hour with all movements operating at LOS C or better. Intersection traffic operations for the No -Build conditions shows that with no site development and existing roadway geometrics and traffic control, all intersection will continue to operate at overall LOS C or better with all movements at LOS D or better in both the AM and PM peak hours in 2020 and in the AM peak hour in 2030. However, during the PM peak hour the intersections of Edmonson Avenue at School Boulevard and Fenning Avenue at School Boulevard will begin to have operational issues requiring consideration of improvements. Intersection traffic operations for the Build conditions shows that, assuming the proposed development with the exiting lane configuration and traffic control all intersection will continue to operate at overall LOS C or better with all movements at LOS D or better in both the AM and PM peak hours in 2020. However, in 2030, during the PM peak hour the intersection of Edmonson Avenue at School Boulevard and during the AM and PM peak hours the intersection of Fenning Avenue at School Boulevard will continue to have operational issues as identified with the no -build analysis. • Based on the results of the traffic operation analysis providing improvements to the intersections of Edmondson Avenue at School Boulevard and Fenning Avenue at School Boulevard would improve the intersection and movement operations. HAVEN RIDGE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC STUDY CITY OF MONTICELLO WSB PROJECT NO. 12471-000 PAGE 22 Based on these conclusions the following is recommended for the development of the Haven Ridge site: 1. Phase 1 and Phase 2 can be developed without any operational improvements (i.e. additional turn lanes, roundabouts, traffic signals) to the adjacent roadways or intersections studied. The adjacent street access locations should be constructed to City standards. 2. Improve Fallon Avenue to City standards from School Boulevard limits to 85th Street with the construction of Phase 1 and 2 of the development, and; 85th Street from Fallon Avenue to City Limits with the completion of the future phases of the development. When determining the improvement needs (i.e. rural vs urban) the safety and drainage of the roadway should be considered. 3. By 2030 consider the construction of a traffic signal system or single lane roundabout at the intersection of Edmonson Avenue at School Boulevard. 4. By 2030 consider the construction of a traffic signal system or single lane roundabout at the intersection of Fenning Avenue at School Boulevard. It is understood that Wright County plans to take jurisdiction over Fenning Avenue in the next 2-3 years. HAVEN RIDGE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC STUDY CITY OF MONTICELLO WSB PROJECT NO. 12471-000 PAGE 23 Appendix D: Well Logs Minnesota Unique Well Number County Wright MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 136613 Quad Monticello WELL AND BORING REPORT Qnaa 1D 138D Minnesota Statutes Chapter 1031 Well Name Township Range Dir Section Subsection BYE, ART 121 25 W 24 BCAAAC Elevation 982 ft. Elev. Method CALL FROM 2 -FOOT COUNTY DEM 5235 85TH ST NE MONTICELLO MN 55362 tigraphy Information ogical Material From To (ft.) Color Hardness SOIL 0 5 .VEL & CLAY 5 14 YELLOW Y 14 30 LT. BRN Y 30 38 GRAY Y & SAND 38 42 GRAY D COARSE 42 58 DARK .VEL COARSE 58 70 DARK D -COARSE TIGHT 70 75 DARK .VEL -COARSE V. 75 82 BLACK Y SOME GRAVEL 82 85 RED D COARSE 85 95 GRYBRN 3T ON BOTTOM 95 95 Remarks Minnesota Well Index Report Entry Date 04/17/1988 Update Date 04/14/2014 Received Date Well Depth Depth Completed Date Well Completed 95 ft. 95 ft. 03/23/1977 Drill Method Non-specified Rotary Drill Fluid Use domestic Status Active Well Hydrofractured? Yes ❑ No ❑ From To Casing Type Single casing Joint Threaded Drive Shoe? Yes ® No ❑ Above/Below Casing Diameter Weight in. To ft. 10.7 lbs./ft. Open Hole From ft. To ft. Screen?X❑ Type stainless Make JOHNSON Diameter Slot/Gauze Length Set 4 in. 18 8 ft. ft. ft. Static Water Level 51 ft. land surface Measure 03/23/1977 Pumping Level (below land surface) Wellhead Completion Pitless adapter manufacturer Model ❑ Casing Protection ❑ 12 in. above grade ❑ At -grade (Environmental Wells and Borings ONLY) Grouting Information Well Grouted?X❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Specified Material Amount From To bentonite ft. ft. Nearest Known Source of Contamination feet Direction Type Well disinfected upon completion? Yes ❑ No Pump ❑ Not Installed Date Installed Manufacturer's name DEMPSTER Model Number HP 0.5 Volt 230 Length of drop pipe 63 ft Capacity 10 g•p• Typ Submersible Abandoned Does property have any not in use and not sealed well(s)? ❑ Yes ❑ No Variance Was a variance granted from the MDH for this well? ❑ Yes ❑ No Miscellaneous First Bedrock Aquifer Quat. buried Last Strat clay Depth to Bedrock ft Located by Minnesota Geological Survey Locate Method GPS SA Off (averaged) System UTM - NAD83, Zone 15, Meters X 438690 Y 5014043 Unique Number Verification Tax Records Input Date 01/27/2010 Angled Drill Hole Well Contractor Stevens Well Co. 27194 STEVENS, J. Licensee Business Lic. or Reg. No. Name of Driller 136613 Printed on 07/31/2018 HE -01205-15 Minnesota Unique Well Number County Wright MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Entry Date 06/10/1994 WELL AND BORING REPORT 23950 E5 Quad Monticello Update Date 02/14/2014 Minnesota Statutes Chapter 1031 Quad1D 138D Received Date Well Name Township Range Dir Section Subsection Well Depth Depth Completed Date Well Completed O'BRIEN, 121 25 W 24 CABACD 96 ft. 95 ft. 10/28/1993 Elevation 970 ft. Elev. Method CALC FROM 2-FOOT COUNTY DEM Drill Method Non-specified Rotary Drill Fluid Bentonite ddress Use domestic Status Active Well 5403 85TH ST NE MONTICELLO MN 55362 Well Hydrofractured? Yes ❑ No ❑ From To Casing Type Single casing Joint Threaded Stratigraphy Information Drive Shoe? Yes ❑ No ❑X Above/Below Geological Material From To (ft.) Color Hardness Casing Diameter Weight Hole Diameter CLAY FIRM 0 30 BROWN 4 in. To 91 ft. 10.7 lbs./ft. 8.7 in. To 30 ft. CLAY & ROCKS FIRM 30 63 BROWN 6.2 in. To 95 ft. SAND 63 78 BRNBLK SOFT SAND & GRAVEL 78 95 BROWN SOFT CLAY FIRM 95 96 BROWN Open Hole From ft. To ft. Screen? X❑ Type stainless Make JOHNSON 304 Diameter Slot/Gauze Length Set 4.5 in. 15 4.5 ft. 92 ft. 95 ft. Remarks WELL LOCATED ITS OF SE CORNER OF GARAGE. Static Water Level 38 ft. land surface Measure 10/28/1993 Pumping Level (below land surface) 58 ft. 3 hrs. Pumping at 40 g.p.m Wellhead Completion Pitless adapter manufacturer BAKER Model SNAPPY ❑ Casing Protection ❑X 12 in. above grade ❑ At -grade (Environmental Wells and Borings ONLY) Grouting Information Well Grouted?X❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Specified Material Amount From To bentonite 1.1 Cubic yards 0 ft. 91 ft. Nearest Known Source of Contamination 50 feet West Direction Sentic tank/drain field Type Well disinfected upon completion? Yes ❑ No Pump ❑ Not Installed Date Installed 01/10/1993 Manufacturer's name GRUNDFOS Model Number 25510-7 HP 1 Volt 230 Length of drop pipe 63 ft Capacity 23 g.p. Typ Submersible Abandoned Does property have any not in use and not sealed well(s)? ❑ Yes ❑X No Variance Was a variance granted from the MDH for this well? ❑ Yes ❑ No Miscellaneous First Bedrock Aquifer Quat. buried Last Strat clay -brown Depth to Bedrock ft Located by Minnesota Geological Survey Locate Method GPS SA Off (averaged) System UTM - NAD83, Zone 15, Meters X 438869 Y 5013610 Unique Number Verification Tax Records Input Date 01/27/2010 Angled Drill Hole Well Contractor Renner E.H. Well 71015 SCHAFFER, R. Licensee Business Lic. or Reg. No. Name of Driller Minnesota Well Index Report 523950 Printed on 07/31/2018 HE -01205-15 Minnesota Unique Well Number County Wright MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Entry Date 05/17/2000 Hardness Y WELL AND BORING REPORT 15 609694 Quad Monticello Y & ROCKS Update Date 05/03/2010 19 BROWN Minnesota Statutes Chapter 1031 D & GRAVEL Quad ID 138D VARIED Received Date Well Name Township Range Dir Section Subsection Well Depth Depth Completed Date Well Completed 121 25 W 24 BBBDBB 67 ft. 66 ft. 05/07/1998 Elevation 958 ft. Elev. Method CALC FROM 2 -FOOT COUNTY DEM Drill Method Non-specified Rotary Drill Fluid Bentonite ddress 66 Use domestic Status Active 5106 85TH ST NE MONTICELLO MN 55362 tigraphy Information ogical Material From To (ft.) Color Hardness Y 0 15 TAN HARD Y & ROCKS 15 19 BROWN MEDIUM D & GRAVEL 19 25 VARIED SOFT Y 25 30 GRAY MEDIUM D & GRAVEL 30 66 VARIED SOFT Y 66 67 RED HARD Remarks Well Hydrofractured? Yes ❑ No ❑ From Casing Type Single casing Joint Drive Shoe? Yes ❑ No ❑ Above/Below Casing Diameter Weight 4 in. To 56 ft. lbs./ft. To Hole Diameter 8 in. To 30 ft. Open Hole From ft. To ft. Screen?X❑ Type plastic Make Diameter Slot/Gauze Length Set 4 in. 15 10 ft. ft. ft. Static Water Level 20 ft. land surface Measure 05/07/1998 Pumping Level (below land surface) ft. 2 hrs. Pumping at 25 g.p.m Wellhead Completion Pitless adapter manufacturer WHITEWATER Model ❑ Casing Protection ❑ 12 in. above grade ❑ At -grade (Environmental Wells and Borings ONLY) Grouting Information Well Grouted?X❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Specified Material Amount From To high solids bentonite 0 ft. 30 ft. Nearest Known Source of Contamination 25 feet South Direction Sentic tank/drain field Type Well disinfected upon completion? ❑ Yes ❑ No Pump ❑ Not Installed Date Installed 05/08/1998 Manufacturer's name RED JACKET Model Number HP 1 Volt 230 Length of drop pipe 40 ft Capacity 18 g.p. Typ Submersible Abandoned Does property have any not in use and not sealed well(s)? ❑ Yes ❑ No Variance Was a variance granted from the MDH for this well? ❑ Yes ❑ No Miscellaneous First Bedrock Aquifer Quat. buried Last Strat clay -red Depth to Bedrock ft Located by Minnesota Geological Survey Locate Method GPS SA Off (averaged) System UTM - NAD83, Zone 15, Meters X 438468 Y 5014387 Unique Number Verification Tax Records Input Date 01/27/2010 Angled Drill Hole Well Contractor Bergerson-Caswell 27058 FELTMANN, T. Licensee Business Lic. or Reg. No. Name of Driller Minnesota Well Index Report 609694 Printed on 07/31/2018 HE -01205-15 Minnesota Unique Well Number County Wright MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Entry Date 04/08/2002 WELL AND BORING REPORT Casing Type Single casing 62223 E6 Quad Monticello Update Date 05/03/2010 Drive Shoe? Yes ❑ No ❑X Above/Below Minnesota Statutes Chapter 1031 From To (ft.) Color Hardness Quad1D 138D Hole Diameter Received Date ell Name Township Range Dir Section Subsection Well Depth Depth Completed Date Well Completed COLLINS, 121 25 W 23 DADCBD 88 ft. 88 ft. 07/30/2001 IW Elevation 974 ft. Elev. Method CALC FROM 2 -FOOT COUNTY DEM Drill Method Non-specified Rotary Drill Fluid Bentonite ddress LAY Use domestic Status Active �/W 8278 EISELE AV MONTICELLO MN 55362 Well Hydrofractured? Yes ❑ No ❑X From To Casing Type Single casing Joint stratigraphy Information Drive Shoe? Yes ❑ No ❑X Above/Below 3eological Material From To (ft.) Color Hardness Casing Diameter Weight Hole Diameter LAY 0 34 BROWN 4 in. To 84 ft. lbs./ft. 8.5 in. To 30 ft. SAND & GRAVEL 34 59 6.5 in. To 88 ft. LAY 59 66 BROWN 3RAVEL 66 80 HARD WATER SAND 80 88 Open Hole From ft. To ft. Screen? X❑ Type stainless Make WESCO Diameter Slot/Gauze Length Set 4 in. 12 4 ft. 84 ft. 88 ft. Static Water Level 22 ft. land surface Measure 07/30/2001 Pumping Level (below land surface) ft. hrs. Pumping at 30 g.p.m Wellhead Completion Pitless adapter manufacturer WHITEWATER Model ❑ Casing Protection ❑ 12 in. above grade ❑ At -grade (Environmental Wells and Borings ONLY) Grouting Information Well Grouted?X❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Specified Material Amount From To high solids bentonite 2 Sacks 0 ft. 40 ft. Nearest Known Source of Contamination 55 feet Northwes Direction Type Well disinfected upon completion? Yes ❑ No Pump ❑ Not Installed Date Installed 08/21/2001 Manufacturer's name HOMEOWNER'S Model Number HP Volt Length of drop pipe ft Capacity g.p. Typ Submersible Abandoned Does property have any not in use and not sealed well(s)? ❑ Yes ❑X No Variance Was a variance granted from the MDH for this well? ❑ Yes X❑ No Miscellaneous First Bedrock Aquifer Quat. buried Last Strat sand Depth to Bedrock ft Located by Minnesota Geological Survey Remarks Locate Method GPS SA Off (averaged) System UTM - NAD83, Zone 15, Meters X 438145 Y 5013347 Unique Number Verification Tax Records Input Date 01/27/2010 Angled Drill Hole Well Contractor Torgerson Well Co. 27056 TORGERSON, R. Licensee Business Lic. or Reg. No. Name of Driller Minnesota Well Index Report 662223 Printed on 07/31/2018 HE -01205-15 Minnesota Unique Well Number MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH County Wright Entry Date 09/04/2012 789748 Quad Monticello WELL AND BORING REPORT Update Date 09/17/2012 Quad ID 138D Minnesota Statutes Chapter 1031 Received Date 06/25/2012 IH ell Name Township Range Dir Section Subsection Well Depth Depth Completed Date Well Completed OLKER, MARK 121 25 W 23 DDBACC 155 ft. 150 ft. 04/25/2012 levation 959 ft. Elev. Method 7.5 minute topographic map (+/- 5 feet) Drill Method Non-specified Rotary Drill Fluid Bentonite ddress Use irrigation Status Active act 5420 37 CR NE MONTICELLO MN 55362 Well Hydrofractured? Yes ❑ No ❑X From To EISELE AV NE MONTICELLO MN 55362 Casing Type Single casing Joint tigraphy Information Drive Shoe? Yes ❑ No ❑X Above/Below ogical Material From To (ft.) Color Hardness Casing Diameter Weight Hole Diameter SOIL 0 2 BROWN SOFT 8 in. To 140 ft. 28.5 lbs./ft. 13 in. To 155 ft. Y 2 9 BROWN SOFT Y 9 13 GRAY SOFT Y 13 18 BROWN SOFT D FINE 18 33 BROWN SOFT Y 33 34 GRAY SOFT Open Hole From ft. To ft. Screen? X❑ Type stainless Make JOHNSON D 34 59 GRAY SOFT Diameter Slot/Gauze Length Set Y 59 83 GRAY SOFT 8 in. 100 10 ft. 140 ft. 150 ft. D 83 97 BROWN SOFT Y ROCKS 97 99 GRAY MEDIUM Static Water Level D 99 100 BROWN SOFT 21 ft. land surface Measure 04/25/2012 D FINE 100 120 BROWN SOFT D 120 150 BROWN SOFT Pumping Level (below land surface) D & CLAY 150 155 GRAY SOFT 43 ft. 1.5 hrs. Pumping at 500 g.p.m. Wellhead Completion Pitless adapter manufacturer Model ❑ Casing Protection ❑X 12 in. above grade ❑ At -grade (Environmental Wells and Borings ONLY) Grouting Information Well Grouted?X❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Specified Material Amount From To bentonite 16 Sacks ft. 50 ft. Nearest Known Source of Contamination 500 feet North Direction Se_ntic tank/drain field Type Well disinfected upon completion? Yes ❑ No Pump ® Not Installed Date Installed Manufacturer's name Model Number HP Volt Length of drop pipe ft Capacity g,p, Typ Abandoned Does property have any not in use and not sealed well(s)? ❑ Yes ❑X No Variance Was a variance granted from the MDH for this well? ❑ Yes X❑ No Miscellaneous First Bedrock Aquifer Quat. buried Last Strat clay+sand-gray Depth to Bedrock ft Located by Minnesota Geological Survey Remarks Locate Method Digitization (Screen) -Map (1:24,0 DRILLERS: ROBBIE TERRES & BRUCE NORDHAUSEN. System UTM - NAD83, Zone 15, Meters X 43 438014 Y 5013184 Unique Number Verification Info/GPS from data Input Date 09/04/2012 Angled Drill Hole Well Contractor Mark J Traut Wells, Inc. 1404 ROBBIEBRUCE Licensee Business Lic. or Reg. No. Name of Driller Minnesota Well Index Report 789748 Printed on 07/31/2018 HE -01205-15 Record of Decision Haven Ridge EAW City of Monticello November 19, 2018 Prepared by: WSO Haven Ridge EAW Record of Decision City of Monticello, MN WSB Project No. 012471-000 ADMINISTRATIVE BACKGROUND Pursuant to Minnesota Rule 4410.4300, the City of Monticello has prepared an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for the proposed Haven Ridge Development. This Record of Decision addresses the State of Minnesota environmental review requirements as established in Minnesota Rule 4410.1700. Marc David Schulte is the project proposer for the EAW. The City of Monticello is the Responsible Governmental Unit (RGU). The EAW was filed with the Minnesota Environmental Quality Board (EQB) and circulated for review and comments to the required EAW distribution list. A Notice of Availability for the initial EAW was published in the EQB Monitor on October 1, 2018. Notices of Availability and Press Releases were published in the Monticello Times on October 4, 2018. The public comment period ended October 31, 2018. Comments were received from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR), Monticello Township, and State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO). All comments were considered in determining the potential for significant environmental impacts. Summaries of the comments received and the City of Monticello's responses to those comments are provided in Section III. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS As to the need for an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) on this project and based on the record in this matter, including the EAW and comments received, the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions: A. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Marc David Schulte is proposing Haven Ridge, a new residential development in Monticello Township. Prior to construction, the development will be considered for annexation to the City of Monticello. The project concept includes 279 single family home units and 76 townhome units. The project will include new infrastructure such as gas, electric, telecommunications, sanitary sewer, storm sewer, watermain, streets, stormwater ponds, parking, sidewalks, trails, and streets. Sewer and water will connect with current municipal facilities. The project will occur in phases. Construction is expected to start in 2019. B. PROJECT HISTORY • The project was subject to a mandatory EAW per Minnesota Rule 4410.4300 Subpt 19.D — Residential Development • The EAW was distributed to the EQB and to the EQB mailing list on October 1, 2018. • Public notices containing information about the availability of the EAW for public review were provided to the Monticello Times on October 4, 2018. • Hard copies of the EAW were provided for public review at Monticello City Hall, Monticello Library, and the Great River Library. An electronic copy of the EAW was available on the City's website. • A notice was published for the EAW in the October 1, 2018 EQB Monitor. The public comment period ended October 31, 2018. Comments were received from the MPCA, DNR, Monticello Township, and SHPO. Copies of Haven Ridge EAW Record of Decision City of Monticello, MN WSB Project No. 012471-000 Page 1 these comment letters are hereby incorporated for reference and included in Attachment A. C. CRITERIA FOR DETERMINING THE POTENTIAL FOR SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS. Minnesota Rule 4410.1700, subp. 1, states "An EIS [Environmental Impact Statement] shall be ordered for projects that have the potential for significant environmental effects." In deciding whether a project has the potential for significant environmental effects, the City of Monticello must consider the four factors set out in Minnesota Rule 4410.1700, subp. 7. With respect to each of these factors, the City of Monticello finds the following: 1. MINNESOTA RULE 4410.1700, SUBP. 7.A - TYPE, EXTENT, AND REVERSIBILITY OF ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS a. The type of environmental impacts and mitigation efforts anticipated as part of this project include: Land Use: The current Comprehensive Plan designates the future land use as a Place to Live and Urban Reserve. The area is identified in the Monticello Township Land Use Plan as Transition Area. This land use is compatible with the project and with adjacent land uses. The project area is also within the annexation area for the City of Monticello. The annexation of the area as part of the development is compatible with the existing orderly annexation agreement. Historical Properties: There is a known archeological site within the same quarter sections as the eastern boundary of the project site. Part of the archeological site outside of the project area was shovel tested in 1983 and no cultural material was found. Additional research, including field survey, may be necessary to adequately assess the subject area's potential to contain archeological sites. Soil Disturbance: The project will involve soil disturbance. A National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit will be required and erosion control best management practices (BMPs) such as silt fence, inlet protection, and a stabilized construction entrance will be in place during construction to reduce sedimentation and prevent erosion from the site. Wetlands: Wright County SWCD approved the wetland delineation on October 30, 2018. The wetland delineation approval occurred after the EAW was published. The approved wetland delineation included 14 wetlands within the project area, which included three additional wetlands that were not part of the preliminary wetland delineation discussed in the EAW. The additional wetland delineation increases the amount of wetland area present within the project area from 29 acres to 29.24 acres. Wetland impacts in the EAW were based on the preliminary wetland delineation. The wetland impacts in the EAW were calculated based on the concept plan and the preliminary wetland delineation. Based on the concept plan and the approved wetland delineation, there are now 4.24 acres of wetland impact. This is an increase of 0.24 acres from the amount identified in the EAW. However, wetland impacts are not final and may change as design progresses. Wetland impacts will be reviewed through the local and federal wetland permitting processes. As part of the wetland permitting process, wetland impacts will need to be minimized Haven Ridge EAW City of Monticello, MN WSB Project No. 012471-000 Record of Decision Page 2 to the greatest extent possible. Wetland mitigation will also be part of the wetland permitting process and will need to follow siting requirements for Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) and the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). Approval of the wetland permits is required prior to site construction. Wastewater — Sanitary sewer to serve the development within the site would be constructed as part of the project construction. The proposed development will connect to the Monticello sanitary sewer system via an existing 10 -inch sanitary sewer in Farmstead Avenue or a newly installed lateral or trunk sanitary sewer. Future phases of the development will require the construction of a sanitary lift station or use of the newly installed trunk system. The Monticello Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) has sufficient residual capacity to treat the estimated wastewater flow that will be generated by the proposed development. Additionally, the wastewater will be domestic in character and will not require specific pretreatment measures. Water Supply: Watermain to serve the development within the site will be constructed as part of the site construction. The development will connect to the Monticello water distribution system via the existing 12 -inch trunk watermain in the Klein Farms and Hunters Crossing sub -divisions. The additional demand is expected to fall within the City's existing DNR water appropriations permit. The entire development is located outside of the City's Drinking Water Supply Management Area (DWSMA). Stormwater: The project will need to meet stormwater runoff rate, volume, and treatment regulations. Stormwater facilities will need to be designed at the site to retain 1 -inch of runoff from the site and to provide water quality treatment to meet NPDES and the City of Monticello requirements. The development plans include stormwater ponds to manage stormwater within the site. There will be no anticipated downstream environmental effects from the proposed project based on the project needing to meet state and local requirements. Wildlife: The DNR Minnesota Natural Heritage Information System (NHIS) has indicated that there are no records or listings within the project area or a one - mile buffer. The DNR NHIS review letter indicated that the Blanding's turtles have not been reported within the project area or a one -mile buffer but the letter said that the turtle may be adversely affected by the proposed project due to the turtle's habitat preference and movement patterns. The NHIS letter included a number of recommendations for construction activities and methods to avoid or minimize disturbance to the Blanding's turtle. These recommendations have been given to the site developer. Recommendations will be included in relevant construction documents and site plans. If a Blanding's turtle is encountered on site, the turtle will be moved by hand out of harm's way or left undisturbed if the turtle is not imminent danger. Based on this review and a review of the site in its current conditions, the project will follow the DNR recommendations where applicable to avoid any impacts to Blanding's turtles. The rusty patched bumble bee is a federally listed species regulated by the US Fish and Wildlife Service. The USFWS has mapped where the rusty patched bumble may be present. The project area is classified as an area where rusty patched bumble bee is not present and have not been observed or collected in these areas since before the year 2000. Based on the UWSFWS mapping and the current land use, the project is anticipated to have no impact to rusty patched bumble bee. The project's effect on the rusty patched bumble bee will also be evaluated as part of any federal permit or action that the project requires. The Haven Ridge EAW City of Monticello, MN WSB Project No. 012471-000 Record of Decision Page 3 federal agencies involved in the federal permit or action will identify measures the project would need to take related to the rusty patched bumble bee if they determine these measures are necessary. Noise: The project site is surrounded by rural roads, farmland, and residential developments. Existing noise sources are those typical of rural residential areas and consist mainly of traffic on the area roadways, which include Fallon Avenue, 851h Street, and Edmonson Avenue. It is anticipated that noise levels will temporarily increase locally during project construction but are expected to return to normal levels following project completion. There are no sensitive receptors (such as hospitals) near the site which raise special concerns for further study; however, construction noise will be limited consistent with the City of Monticello's noise ordinance. Transportation: A Traffic Study was completed for the proposed Haven Ridge development. This study provides a comprehensive review of anticipated traffic impacts for the regional area, including the area surrounding the proposed development. The Traffic Study identifies recommended mitigation improvements at three intersections by 2030 in addition to the plan site improvement. These recommendations include: Phase 1 and Phase 2 can be developed without any operational improvements (i.e., additional lanes, roundabouts, traffic signals) to the adjacent roadways or intersections studied. The adjacent street access locations should be constructed to City standards. 2. Improve Fallon Avenue to City standards from School Boulevard to 85th Street with the construction of Phase 1 and 2 of the development and 85th Street from Fallon Avenue to City limits with the completion of the future phases of the development. When determining the improvement needs (i.e., rural versus urban) the safety and drainage of the roadway should be considered. 3. By 2030 consider the construction of a traffic signal system or roundabout at the intersection of Edmonson Avenue at School Boulevard. 4. By 2030 consider the construction of a traffic signal system or roundabout at the intersection of Fenning Avenue at School Boulevard. It is understood that Wright County plans to take jurisdiction over Fenning Avenue in the next two to three years. b. The extent and reversibility of environmental impacts for the proposed project are consistent with those of a typical residential development project. Impacts will be minimized to the extent practical, with mitigation provided for those impacts which cannot be avoided to resources. 2. MINNESOTA RULE 4410.1700, SUBP. 7.13 - CUMULATIVE POTENTIAL EFFECTS OF RELATED OR ANTICIPATED FUTURE PROJECTS Development is anticipated to begin in 2019. No other development projects are known in the surrounding area that would interact with this project. Cumulative environmental effects from this development will not occur. Haven Ridge EAW Record of Decision City of Monticello, MN WSB Project No. 012471-000 Page 4 3. MINNESOTA RULE 4410.1700, SUBP. 7.0 - THE EXTENT TO WHICH ENVIRONMENTAL AFFECTS ARE SUBJECT TO MITIGATION BY ONGOING PUBLIC REGULATORY AUTHORITY a) The following permits or approvals will be required for the project: Unit of Government Type of Application Status Federal US Army Corps of Engineers Section 404 Permit To Be Obtained, if needed State Department of Natural Resources Pollution Control Agency Pollution Control Agency Pollution Control Agency Department of Health County Wright County Soil and Water Conservation District Wright County Wright County Highway Department Local City of Monticello City of Monticello City of Monticello City of Monticello City of Monticello City of Monticello Water Appropriation Permit To Be Obtained, if Application needed NPDES Construction Permit To Be Obtained Sanitary Sewer Extension To Be Obtained Section 401 Permit To Be Obtained, if Preliminary and Final Plat needed Watermain Extension/Plan Review To Be Obtained Wetland Conservation Act To Be Obtained Approval Final Plat approval To Be Obtained Approval To Be Obtained Development Application/Land To Be Obtained Disturbance Permit Planned Unit Development To Be Obtained Application Amendment to Comprehensive To Be Obtained Land Use Plan Annexation Petition To Be Obtained Preliminary and Final Plat To Be Obtained Approvals Rezoning Approval To Be Obtained b) The City of Monticello finds that the potential impacts identified as part of the proposed Haven Ridge development are minimal and can be addressed through the regulatory agencies as part of the permitting process. As a result, additional analysis of these impacts is not required. 4. MINNESOTA RULE 4410.1700, SUBP. 7.D - THE EXTENT TO WHICH ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS CAN BE ANTICIPATED AND CONTROLLED AS A RESULT OF OTHER AVAILABLE ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES UNDERTAKEN BY PUBLIC AGENCIES OR THE PROJECT PROPOSER, INCLUDING OTHER EISs. The City finds: 1. The proposed project is reasonably similar to other residential development projects. Haven Ridge EAW Record of Decision City of Monticello, MN WSB Project No. 012471-000 Page 5 2. The City is planning for development with its Comprehensive Plan process. Development is required to meet the City's local planning and permitting requirements. 3. Development impacts within the city are subject to local, regional, state, and federal requirements. 4. Considering the results of environmental review and permitting processes for similar projects, the City of Monticello finds that the environmental effects of the project can be adequately anticipated, controlled, and mitigated. D. CONCLUSIONS The Haven Ridge EAW and comments received have generated information adequate to determine that the proposed project does not have the potential for significant environmental effects. The EAW has identified areas where the potential for environmental effects exist, but appropriate mitigation measures can be incorporated into the project plans and the required approvals and permits to mitigate these effects will be obtained. The project will comply with all local, county, and federal review agency requirements. Based on the criteria established in Minnesota Rule 4410.1700, the project does not have the potential for significant environmental effects. Based on the Findings of Fact and Conclusions, the project does not have the potential for significant environmental impacts. Therefore, an EIS is not required for the Haven Ridge Development III. AGENCY COMMENTS AND CITY OF MONTICELLO'S RESPONSES A 30 -day comment period for the Haven Ridge EAW ended on October 31, 2018. Comments were received from the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR), Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO), and Monticello Township. Two sets of comments were received from Monticello Township. All comments from the Monticello Township were included. Responses are provided below. These letters are included in Attachment A. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Comment 1: We understand the Natural Heritage Review letter had not been received prior to the public notice of the EAW. The review letter has since been completed and sent to the applicant. The Natural Heritage Review letter identified that the Blanding's turtle, a state -listed threatened species has the potential to be adversely affected by the project. Recommendations for avoiding or minimizing impacts to these species are included within the letter. The record of decision should discuss potential impacts to this rare species and identify measures that will be taken to avoid or minimize disturbance. Response 1: The record of decision includes information about the Blanding's turtle and identifies measures that will be taken to avoid or minimize disturbance. Comment 2: Table 1 on page 5 of the EAW notes that 9.5 acres of woods/forest will be removed. We recommend that clearing/grubbing of trees and shrubs be Haven Ridge EAW Record of Decision City of Monticello, MN WSB Project No. 012471-000 Page 6 conducted late fall through early spring, outside of the nesting/roosting season for birds/bats, to avoid impacting these species during this critical time. Response 2: The developer will consider the timing of tree and shrub removal to minimize birds/bats impacts. Tree removal is regulated by the City as part of the City's tree protection ordinance. All tree removal will be reviewed by the City during their permitting process for compliance with the City's tree protection ordinance. Comment 3: A DNR Water Appropriations Permit is required if dewatering in volumes that exceed 10,000 gallons per day, or one million gallons per year. If dewatering associates with installation of utilities, sewer, etc., is require in volumes that exceed these amounts, a permit water appropriations permit is required. Response 3: The DNR water appropriations permit was listed under Table 2 of the EAW. The developer will need to apply for and meet all permit requirements. Minnesota Pollution Control Aciencv (MPCA) Comment 1: It may be necessary to obtain a Sanitary Sewer Extension Permit for the MPCA prior to construction. The application form and additional information on this process can be found at htti)://www.r)ca.state.mn.us/water/permits/index.htmI#sanitarvsewer. Questions on the sanitary sewer extension permit process should be directed to Corey Mathisen at 651-757-2554 or corev.matthisen(a)state.mn.us Response 1: The sanitary sewer extension permit was listed under Table 2 of the EAW. The developer will need to apply for and meet all permit requirements. Comment 2: The EAW does not describe all downtown surface waters within 1 mile of the Project site. Due to the size of the Project, the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan may require review and approval by the MPCA if there is a discharge point on the Project within 1 mile of Pelican Lake, which is listed as impaired for construction -related impairments. The Project would also have to comply with additional Best Management Practices (BMPs) requirements in the General Construction Stormwater Permit. The same requirements will apply if there is a discharge point within 1 -mile of the Mississippi River. Response 2: The developer will need to apply and meet all permit requirements, including the NPDES permit. Comment 3: The EAW mentions that the project will comply with requirements of Phase II of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Construction Stormwater Permit. Please note that the current NPDES Construction Stormwater Phase II Permit is valid only through July of 2013. The new permit has significantly more stringent requirements for permanent stormwater treatment that the current permit in situations regulated under Appendix A of the permit (within a mile of special or impaired waters). It also affects projects not regulated under Appendix A (projects outside of the 1 -mile radius from impaired or special waters), for which there will now be required treatment for 1 inch of runoff, as opposed to 0.5 inches, per acres of new pervious surface. Information on the new Construction Stormwater Permit is available on the MPCA website at: htti)://www.i)ca.state.mn.us/v3daf96. Questions regarding Construction Stormwater Permit requirements should be directed to Roberta Getman at 507- 206-2629 or Roberta. GemanO)state.mn.us. Haven Ridge EAW City of Monticello, MN WSB Project No. 012471-000 Record of Decision Page 7 Response 3: The developer will need to apply and meet all permit requirements, including the NPDES permit. The developer will also ensure adequate BMPs and wetland protection measures are in place at the site. Comment 4: The EAW does not describe specific erosion and sediment control BMPs used during construction to protect area surface waters, including wetlands site. Redundant down gradient sediment controls are required if 50 -feet of existing buffers to the wetlands are encroached. The 50 -foot buffers must otherwise be preserved during and after the construction. Response 4: The developer will need to apply and meet the City's wetland buffer ordinance and meet all permit requirements for the NPDES permit. The developer will also ensure adequate BMPs and wetland protection measures are in place at the site. Comment 5: The MPCA highly encourages the proposers to utilize Minimal Impact Design Standards by incorporation Better Site Design and Green Infrastructure practices into the site design. Examples including preserving natural areas and wetlands, maintaining buffers to waterbodies, installing green roofs, vegetated swales, cisterns for water storage and reuse, narrower streets and sidewalks, smaller parking lots, pervious pavements, bioretention areas, etc. Reducing the amount of new impervious areas and retaining stormwater onsite will also help minimize the development's contribution to the flooding issues discussed in the EAW. Response 5: The developer will be given this information and they may consider the use of Minimal Impact Design Standards practices to minimize stormwater impacts. State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) Comment 1: Due to the nature and location of the proposed project, we recommend that a Phase 1 archeological survey be competed. The survey must meet the requirements of the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Identification and Evaluation, and should include an evaluation of National Register eligibility for any properties that are identified. For a list of consultants who have expressed an interest in undertaking such surveys, please visit the website preservationdirectory. mnhs.org, and select "Archeologists" in the "Search by Specialties" box. We will reconsider the need for survey if the project area can be documented as previously surveyed or disturbed. Any previous survey work must meet contemporary standards. Note: plowed areas and right-of-way are not automatically considered disturbed. Archaeological sites can remain intact beneath the plow zone and in undisturbed portions of the right of way. Response 1: The developer is aware if the project obtains federal financial assistance or requires a federal permit or licenses, that coordination with SHPO will be initiated by the lead federal agency. As stated in the EAW and this document, project will likely require a permit from the USACE. The developer is aware that USACE may require a Phase 1 archeological survey as part of the wetland permit issued by the USACE. The developer is prepared to address the Phase 1 archeological survey as part of a federal permit for the project. Monticello Township Haven Ridge EAW City of Monticello, MN WSB Project No. 012471-000 Record of Decision Page 8 Comment 1: 1 am writing as Vice chair of Monticello Township board. I had emailed Ms. Schumann to attempt to have additional time to review the EAW. It was lacking information that the board considered relevant in the comment making process. An extension was not possible. I emailed a number of the organizations that were providing data. I was able to secure a number of the items and information the board would want to review. However we did not have another meeting set to do so, as the board meets the first and 31d Mondays. The additional data was received on or after the 5th Monday of the month and did not allow for the board to thoroughly look those submissions over in addition to what has been submitted in the initial format of the EAW. The board would sill request additional time be made available with which to review the data that was referred to in the EAW but only recently has become available. Response 1: Comment noted. Comment 2: We looked & there were a couple unresolved issues or discrepancies one is in the road review, on the map (appendices figure 6) Nelson/Obrien noted as low density but in the written report they note no additional development. This additional development will significantly impact the traffic study and should be addressed in the report where they are putting in roundabouts and re configuring roads taking control of Edmondson to 85 to Fallon traffic goes up to 3192 new total trips by the city's account. Response 2: The low density shown on Figure 6 is based on the City of Monticello's comprehensive plan designation for that area. The comprehensive plan is not indicative of any proposed or future development of that area. The Comprehensive Plan is a long term guiding document. The response to Question 19 of the EAW notes correctly that no additional development proposal for the surrounding area have been submitted or discussed with the City. Question 19 also states that the has been some interest in development adjacent to this site, but no specific projects or project proposers have been identified. Question 19 is specifically asking about specific projects that have been identified. So both Figure 6 and the response to Question 19 are correct because they are asking about development in the area over two different time periods. The traffic study accounts for future development assuming a typical 2% per year growth rate which is based on County State Aid traffic projection factors. Additional traffic analyses are considered when individual developments are proposed. There is no current proposal for the Nelson/Obrien sites at this time, therefore the traffic study uses the 2% per year growth rate assumption when providing recommendations for roadway and intersection improvements. Comment 3: There is a note for historical review that any data older than ten yrs should be re- evaluated and their data is from 1983, a known archaeological site is noted as adjacent to the project on the south east corner, and the city report acknowledges a potential need for follow up, with the proper department. In additional the state historic preservation office submitted the addition recommendations noted below which the township would like to see addressed and the data made available for further review. (The township copied and pasted the comment's SHPO sent to the City of Monticello. The SHPO comments are listed above so they are not being restated here. The township's comment which includes their copy and paste of SHPO's comments to the City of Monticello is attached.) Haven Ridge EAW City of Monticello, MN WSB Project No. 012471-000 Record of Decision Page 9 Response 3: The City and the developer are aware of SHPO's comments and have provided a response to SHPO's comment under Response 1 under the SHPO heading. Comment 4: There is 4 acre of 29 notes for wet land delineation but it is unclear as to the location of it relevant to the 29 acres identified. After contacting SWCD for additional information on that & wetland replacement (2:1) ration & the cities' proposed buffer as it impact twnshp residents on 117, it was determined that there was more than the # of wetlands initially reports, and that the total acreage is nearly ten acres more than noted in the report. The township board would like to know what the implications are to the other areas of the EAW with the corrected data. Response 4: The information about wetlands in the EAW was completed using the preliminary wetland delineation. On October 31, 2018 the SWCD issued the final wetland delineation approval which includes additional wetland areas and changes to wetlands from the preliminary wetland delineation. This approval was distributed after the EAW was published so it was not available at the time the EAW was published. As part of the EAW process, the published EAW is considered final and is not updated. The number of wetland has been clarified on Page 2 of the record of decision document. The permitting requirements including wetland buffers and mitigation for wetland impacts identified in the EAW are still correct therefore the additional 0.24 acres of potential wetland impact do not change the EAW finding's related to wetlands. Comment 5: There is a "large public wetland noted" at the time of the report it is not documented that it was part of the wetland conservation act, we would like the documentation for that either way, that won't be established until wetland permitting process (p18) 1 have since spoken to Army Corp of Engineers and they will be sending a report to address wetland delineation late in November. Response 5: Comment noted. As mentioned in the EAW, it is unknown at this time if any of the impacted wetlands are outside of regulation by either the Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) or USACE Section 404. The jurisdictional status will be determined during the wetland permitting process. Additionally, the DNR will review their jurisdiction of the public water wetland as part of their permitting process. Comment 6: Ponding and ground water issues are noted TBD as project moves forward, We were under the impression they needed to initially be presented in the EAW as well as service time lines for the phasing and accommodation of sewer and water capacity Response 6: The EAW identifies the quantity and quality of stormwater runoff at the project site prior to and post construction. The EAW also identifies requirements for the stormwater runoff including ponding requirements and necessary sizes of ponds. The specific location and design of the ponds are outside of the EAW process. Ponds and related stormwater systems will be reviewed by the City as part of their approval process. As stated in the EAW, the development will be required to connect to the City of Monticello's sewer and water systems. Information about sewer and water capacity related to the additional demand by the development on the City's existing system is included in the EAW document. Service timelines for phasing Haven Ridge EAW Record of Decision City of Monticello, MN WSB Project No. 012471-000 Page 10 is outside of the EAW process. The City will be reviewing phasing as part of their approval process. Comment 7: We are seeking input from the county as to where the boundary in Wright County currently is for the carbon -dioxide maintenance area, and a determination if the boundary includes this project under the most recent update. At the closing of the comment stage I had not received that information. Response 7: The project area is outside of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) designed carbon monoxide maintenance area. Comment 8: The city states in their natural resources inventory the area is unsuitable habitat, but we don't know that, their data parallels the resource plan done by the county. We have concerns that the city had not included the potential of critical habitat for the rusty patched bumble bee, as part of its habitat impact statement. The form states that they were waiting for information. Currently it is listed by the city as "having no significant environmental impacts", without the DNR piece it was difficult to substantiate the claim. The DNR report became available this wk and is included below. Response 8: The EAW states that "the current site is mostly unsuitable habitat" in reference to the fact that the majority of project area is in agricultural production. Agricultural production areas are documented to have low existing habitat value and would not provide suitable habitat for fish, wildlife, plant communities, or rare features or ecosystems. The EAW also states that the areas that provide habitat to wildlife are expected to be avoided. The statements made about habitat in the EAW are correct and substantiated. Please see Response 9 for the response to rusty patched bumble bees. Comment 9: The report from the DNR includes recommendations for Blanding's turtles, but does not have accommodations for habitat for rusty patch bumblebees which are on the property despite not being part of the inventory for the DNR. Response 9: The DNR regulates state listed species. The rusty patched bumble is not a state listed species so it outside of the DNR's regulations. The rusty patched bumble bee is a federally listed species regulated by the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). The USFWS published guidance for project proposers on how to evaluate if the project requires additional review for the rusty patched bumble bee. The guidance instructs the project proposer to review the map of where rusty patched bumble bee may be present that USFWS developed and determine if your project is in a high potential zone. If the project is not in a high potential zone, no further action is needed. The City followed this guidance and found that the Haven Ridge project area is classified as an area where rusty patched bumble bee is not present and have not been observed or collected in these areas since before the year 2000. This classification is not the high potential zone. According to the USFWS guidance, no further action is needed. At this time, no further action related to the rusty patched bumble bee will be taken. The project's effect on the rusty patched bumble bee will also be evaluated as part of any federal permit or action that the project requires. The federal agencies involved in the federal permit or action will identify measures the project would need to take related to the rusty patched bumble bee if they determine these measures are necessary. Comment 10: There are 11 wet land totaling 29 acres on the report, 4 acres are to be filled. In the report from WCSW there are more recorded than 11. There is some Haven Ridge EAW Record of Decision City of Monticello, MN WSB Project No. 012471-000 Page 11 confusion which areas those are and if the project has any impact. The report states " there are eleven wetlands on the site" ... then it goes on to say "5 of the ten impacted wetlands will be completed impacted, the other 5 will be partially filled" this accounting should be clarified in the responses and reflect the 14 noted by WCSW. Response 10: As noted in Response 4, the number of wetlands was updated after the EAW was completed and published. As part of the EAW process, the published EAW is considered final and is not updated but information can be incorporated into the record of decision as part of the findings process with the EAW. The number of wetlands has been clarified in Response 4. The permitting requirements including wetland buffers and mitigation for wetland impacts identified in the EAW are still correct therefore the additional 0.24 acres of potential wetland impact do not change the EAW finding's related to wetlands. Haven Ridge EAW City of Monticello, MN WSB Project No. 012471-000 Record of Decision Page 12 Attachment A — Agency Comments Haven Ridge EAW City of Monticello, MN WSB Project No. 012471-000 Record of Decision Page 13 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES October 29, 2018 Angela Schumann Community Development Director 505 Walnut Street Monticello, MN 55362 RE: Haven Ridge Development EAW Dear Angela Schumann, The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) has reviewed the Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for the Haven Ridge Development. We offer the following comments for your consideration. We understand the Natural Heritage Review letter had not been received prior to public notice of the EAW. The review letter has since been completed and sent to the applicant (attached for your record). The Natural Heritage Review letter identified that the Blanding's turtle, a state -listed threatened species has the potential to be adversely affected by the project. Recommendations for avoiding or minimizing impacts to these species are included within the letter. The record of decision should discuss potential impacts to this rare species and identify measures that will be taken to avoid or minimize disturbance (items 13 c and d). Table 1 on page 5 of the EAW notes that 9.5 acres of woods/forest will be removed. We recommend that clearing/grubbing of trees and shrubs be conducted late fall through early spring, outside of the nesting/roosting season for birds/bats, to avoid impacting these species during this critical time. A DNR Water Appropriation Permit is required if dewatering in volumes that exceed 10,000 gallons per day, or one million gallons per year. If dewatering associated with installation of utilities, sewer, etc., is required in volumes that exceed these amounts, a permit water appropriation permit is required. On behalf of the DNR, thank you for your consideration of these comments. Sincerely, /s/ Rebecca Horton Region Environmental Assessment Ecologist Attachments: • Natural Heritage Review letter and attachments (Blanding's turtle factsheet and flyer, and BMP's for erosion control) Minnesota Department of Natural Resources • Ecological and Water Resources 1200 Warner Road, St. Paul, MN 55106 Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Division of Ecological & Water Resources 500 Lafayette Road, Box 25 St. Paul, MN 55155-4025 September 27, 2018 Correspondence # ERDB 20190093 MS. Laura Wehr WSB & Associates, Inc. 701 Xenia Avenue South, Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 RE: Natural Heritage Review of the proposed Haven Ridge, T121N R25W Sections 23, 24, & 26; Wright County Dear MS. Wehr, As requested, the Minnesota Natural Heritage Information System has been queried to determine if any rare species or other significant natural features are known to occur within an approximate one -mile radius of the proposed project. Based on this query, rare features have been documented within the search area (for details, please visit theeP for more information on the biology, habitat use, and conservation measures of these rare species). Please note that the following rare features may be adversely affected by the proposed project: Blanding's turtles (Emydoidea b/andingii), a state -listed threatened species, have been reported from the vicinity of the proposed project, but outside of the one -mile radius, but may be encountered on site. Blanding's turtles use wetlands as well as upland areas up to and over a mile distant from wetlands. Uplands are used for nesting, basking, periods of dormancy, and traveling between wetlands. Factors believed to contribute to the decline of this species include collisions with vehicles, wetland drainage and degradation, and the development of upland habitat. Any added fatality can be detrimental to populations of Blanding's turtles, as these turtles have a low reproduction rate that depends upon a high survival rate to maintain population levels. This project has the potential to impact this rare turtle through direct fatalities or habitat disturbance/destruction due to dewatering, excavation, fill, or other construction activities associated with the project. Actions to avoid or minimize disturbance to this state -protected turtle may include, but are not limited to, the following recommendations: o Avoid Type 2 & 3 wetlands, o To avoid any incidental takings, avoid filling or dewatering wetlands during the winter, o Implement stringent sediment and erosion control methods, o Use wildlife -friendly erosion control methods (see enclosed fact sheet), o Monitor for turtles during construction and report any sightings to the DNR, o Refer to the first list of recommendations in the enclosed Blanding's Turtle Fact Sheet. If greater protection for turtles is desired, the second list of recommendations can be implemented as well. The fact sheet contains specific recommendations regarding roads, utilities, and landscaping that will pertain to this project. o For further assistance regarding the Blanding's turtle, please contact the DNR Regional Nongame Specialist, Erica Hoaglund at 651-259-5772 or _ _ s,Y: ��;:__. The attached flyer should be given to all contractors working in the area. If Blanding's turtles are encountered on site, please remember that state law and rules prohibit the destruction of threatened or endangered species, except under certain prescribed conditions. If turtles are in imminent danger they must be moved by hand out of harm's way, otherwise they are to be left undisturbed. The Environmental Assessment Worksheet should address whether the proposed project has the potential to adversely affect the above rare features and, if so, it should identify specific measures that will be taken to avoid or minimize disturbance. Sufficient information should be provided so the DNR can determine whether a takings permit will be needed for any of the above protected species. Please include a copy of this letter in any state or local license or permit application. Please note that measures to avoid or minimize disturbance to the above rare features may be included as restrictions or conditions in any required permits or licenses. The Natural Heritage Information System (NNIS), a collection of databases that contains information about Minnesota's rare natural features, is maintained by the Division of Ecological and Water Resources, Department of Natural Resources. The NHIS is continually updated as new information becomes available, and is the most complete source of data on Minnesota's rare or otherwise significant species, native plant communities, and other natural features. However, the NHIS is not an exhaustive inventory and thus does not represent all of the occurrences of rare features within the state. Therefore, ecologically significant features for which we have no records may exist within the project area. If additional information becomes available regarding rare features in the vicinity of the project, further review may be necessary. For environmental review purposes, the results of this Natural Heritage Review are valid for one year; the results are only valid for the project location (noted above) and the project description provided on the NHIS Data Request Form. Please contact me if project details change or for an updated review if construction has not occurred within one year. The Natural Heritage Review does not constitute review or approval by the Department of Natural Resources as a whole. Instead, it identifies issues regarding known occurrences of rare features and potential effects to these rare features. If needed, please contact your Nt to determine whether there are other natural resource concerns associated with the proposed project. Please be aware that additional site assessments or review may be required. Thank you for consulting us on this matter, and for your interest in preserving Minnesota's rare natural resources. An invoice will be mailed to you under separate cover. Page 2 of 3 Sincerely, Samantha Bump Natural Heritage Review Specialist i n Enc. Wildlife Friendly Erosion Control Blanding's Turtle Fact Sheet & Flyer Links: Rare Species Guide DNR Regional Environmental Assessment Ecologist Contact Info Cc: Becky Horton Leslie Parris Erica Hoaglund Page 3 of 3 MMINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY 520 Lafayette Road North I St. Paul, Minnesota 55155-4194 1 651-296-6300 800-657-3864 1 Use your preferred relay service I info.pca@state.mn.us I Equal Opportunity Employer October 23, 2018 Angela Schumann City of Monticello Community Development Director 505 Walnut Street Monticello, MN 55362 Re: Haven Ridge Development Environmental Assessment Worksheet Dear Ms. Schumann: Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for the Haven Ridge project (Project) in the city of Monticello, Wright County, Minnesota. Regarding matters for which the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) has regulatory responsibility or other interests, the MPCA staff has the following comments for your consideration. It may be necessary to obtain a Sanitary Sewer Extension Permit from the MPCA prior to construction. The application form and additional information on this process can be found at httr)://www.oca,state.mn.us/water/permits/index.htmI#sanitarvsewer. Questions on the sanitary sewer extension permit process should be directed to Corey Mathisen at 651-757-2554 or Co rev.Mathisen(@state.mn.us. 2. The EAW does not describe all downtown surface waters within 1 -mile of the Project site. Due to the size of the Project, the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan may require review and approval by the MPCA if there is a discharge point on the Project within 1 mile of Pelican Lake, which is listed as impaired for construction -related impairments. The Project would also have to comply with additional Best Management Practices (BMPs) requirements in the General Construction Stormwater Permit. The same requirements will apply if there is a discharge point within 1 -mile of the Mississippi River. The EAW mentions that the project will comply with requirements of Phase II of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Construction Stormwater Permit. Please note that the current NPDES Construction Stormwater Phase II Permit is valid only through July of 2013. The new permit has significantly more stringent requirements for permanent stormwater treatment than the current permit in situations regulated under Appendix A of the permit (within a mile of special or impaired waters). It also affects projects not regulated under Appendix A (projects outside of the 1 mile radius from impaired or special waters), for which there will now be required treatment for 1 inch of runoff, as opposed to 0.5 inches, per acre of new impervious surface. Information on the new Construction Stormwater Permit is available on the MPCA website at: http://www.oca.state.mn.us/v3dof96. Questions regarding Construction Stormwater Permit requirements should be directed to Roberta Getman at 507-206-2629 or Roberta -Getman Pstate.mn.us. Angela Schumann Page 2 October 23, 2018 4. The EAW does not describe specific erosion and sediment control BMPs used during construction to protect area surface waters, including wetlands site. Redundant down gradient sediment controls are required if 50 -feet of existing buffers to the welands are encroached. The 50 -foot buffers must otherwise be preserved during and after the construction. The MPCA highly encourages the proposers to utilize Minimal Impact Desien Standards by incorporating Better Site Desijzn and Green Infrastructure practices into the site design. Examples include preserving natural areas and wetlands, maintaining buffers to waterbodies, installing green roofs, vegetated swales, cisterns for water storage and reuse, narrower streets and sidewalks, smaller parking lots, pervious pavements, bioretention areas, etc. Reducing the amount of new impervious areas and retaining stormwater onsite will also help minimize the development's contribution to the flooding issues discussed in the EAW. We appreciate the opportunity to review this Project. Please provide your specific responses to our comments and notice of decision on the need for an Environmental Impact Statement. Please be aware that this letter does not constitute approval by the MPCA of any or all elements of the Project for the purpose of pending or future permit action(s) by the MPCA. Ultimately, it is the responsibility of the Project proposer to secure any required permits and to comply with any requisite permit conditions. If you have any questions concerning our review of this EAW, please contact me by email at Kevin.kain(&state.mn.us or by telephone at 651-757-2482. Sincerely, Kevin Kain Project Manager Environmental Review Unit Resource Management and Assistance Division KK:bt cc: Dan Card, MPCA St. Paul Cory Mathisen, MPCA St. Paul Roberta Getman, MPCA Rochester DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE October 31, 2018 Ms. Angela Schumann City of Monticello Community Dev't Dir. 505 Walnut Street Monticello, MN 55362 Laura Wehr WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S, Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 RE: EAW - Haven Ridge Development T121 R25 S23, 24, 26 Monticello Twp., Wright County SHPO Number: 2019-0084 Dear Ms. Schumann and Ms. Wehr: Thank you for providing this office with a copy of the Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for the above -referenced project. Due to the nature and location of the proposed project, we recommend that a Phase I archaeological survey be completed. The survey must meet the requirements of the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Identification and Evaluation, and should include an evaluation of National Register eligibility for any properties that are identified. For a list of consultants who have expressed an interest in undertaking such surveys, please visit the website preservationdirectory.mnhs.org, and select "Archaeologists" in the "Search by Specialties" box. We will reconsider the need for survey if the project area can be documented as previously surveyed or disturbed. Any previous survey work must meet contemporary standards. Note: plowed areas and right-of-way are not automatically considered disturbed. Archaeological sites can remain intact beneath the plow zone and in undisturbed portions of the right-of-way. Please note that this comment letter does not address the requirements of Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1.966 and 36 CFR § 800. If this project is considered for federal financial assistance, or requires a federal permit or license, then review and consultation with our office will need to be initiated by the lead federal agency. Be advised that comments and recommendations provided by our office for this state -level review may differ from findings and determinations made by the federal agency as part of review and consultation under Section 106. MINNESOTA STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE 50 Sherburne Avenue p Administration Building 203 p Saint Paul, Minnesota 55155 p 651-201-3287 mn.gov/admin/shpo/ p mnshpo(ai)state.mn.us October 31, 2018 If you have any questions regarding our review of this project, please contact our Environmental Review Program at (651) 201-3285. Sincerely, . 040WXt Sarah J. Beimers Environmental Review Program Manager 0 Page 2 From: Angela Schumann <Angela.Schumann@ci.monticello.mn.us> Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2018 8:04 AM To: Laura Wehr Subject: FW: EAW comments final version Angela Schumann Community Development Director City of Monticello www.ci.monticello.mn.us 763-271-3224 Email correspondence to and from the City of Monticello government office is subject to the Minnesota Government Data Practices act and may be disclosed to third parties. From: monticellotownship@tds.net <monticellotownship@tds.net> Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2018 3:54 PM To: Angela Schumann <Angela.Schumann@ci.monticello.mn.us> Cc: Brett <>; Shannon Bve <> Subject: EAW comments final version To: Angela Schumann From: Shannon Bye on behalf of the Monticello Township Board of Supervisors RE: Ridge Haven EAW To whom it may concern, I am writing as Vice chair of the Monticello Township board. I had e mailed Ms Schumann to attempt to have additional time to review the EAW. It was lacking information that the board considered relevant in the comment making process. An extension was not possible. I emailed a number of the organizations that were providing data. I was able to secure a number of the items and information the board would want to review. However we did not have another meeting set to do so, as the board meets the first and 3rd Mondays. The additional data was received on or after the 5th Monday of the month and did not allow for the board to thoroughly look those submissions over in addition to what had been submitted in the initial format of the EAW. The board would still request additional time be made available with which to review the data that was referred to in the EAW but only recently has become available. We looked & there were a couple unresolved issues or discrepancies one is in the road review, on the map(appendices figure 6) Nelson/Obrien noted as low density but in the written report they note no additional development (p28). This additional development will significantly impact the traffic study and should be addressed in the report where they are putting in roundabouts and re configuring roads taking control of Edmondson to 85 to Fallon traffic goes up to 3192 new total trips by the city's account. There is a note for historical review that any data older than ten yrs should be re- evaluated and their data is from 1983, a known archaeological site is noted as adjacent to the project on the south east corner, and the city report acknowledges a potential need for follow up, with the proper department. In addition the state historic preservation office submitted the addition recommendations noted below which the township would like to see addressed and the data made available for further review Due to the nature and location of the proposed project, we recommend that a Phase I archaeological survey be completed. The survey must meet the requirements of the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Identification and Evaluation, and should include an evaluation of National Register eligibility for any properties that are identified. For a list of consultants who have expressed an interest in undertaking such surveys, please visit the website preservationdirectorv.mnhs.orq, and select "Archaeologists" in the "Search by Specialties" box. We will reconsider the need for survey if the project area can be documented as previously surveyed or disturbed. Any previous survey work must meet contemporary standards. Note: plowed areas and right-of-way are not automatically considered disturbed. Archaeological sites can remain intact beneath the plow zone and in undisturbed portions of the right-of-way, Please note that this comment letter does not address the requirements of Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 and 36 CFR $ 800. If this project is considered for federal financial assistance, or requires a federal permit or license, then review and consultation with our office will need to be initiated by the lead federal agency. Be advised that comments and recommendations provided by our office for this state -level review may differ from findings and determinations made by the federal agency as part of review and consultation under Section 106. There is 4 acre of 29 noted for wet land delineation but it is unclear as to the location of it relevant to the 29 acres identified, After contacting SWCD for additional information on that & wetland replacement (2:1) ration & the cities' proposed buffer as it impact twnshp residents on 117, it was determined that there were more than the # of wetlands initially reports, and that the total acreage is nearly ten acres more than noted in the report. The township board would like to know what the implications are to the other areas of the EAW with the corrected data. There is a "large public wetland noted" at the time of the report it is not documented that it was part of the wetland conservation act, we would like the documentation for that either way, that won't be established until wetland permitting process (pl 8) 1 have since spoken to Army Corp of Engineers and they will be sending a report to address wetland delineation late in November. Ponding and ground water issues are noted TBD as project moves forward, We were under the impression they needed to initially be presented in the EAW as well as service time lines for the phasing and accommodation of sewer and water capacity We are seeking input from the county as to where the boundary in Wright County currently is for the carbon -dioxide maintenance area, and a determination if the boundary includes this project under the most recent update. At the closing of the comments stage I had not received that information. The city states in their natural resource inventory the area is unsuitable habitat, but we don't know that, their data parallels the resource plan done by the county. We have concerns that the city had not included the potential of critical habitat for the rusty patched bumble bee, as part of its habitat impact statement. The form states that they were waiting for information. Currently it is listed by the city as "having no significant environmental impacts", without the DNR piece it was difficult to substantiate the claim. The DNR report became available this wk and is included below. The report from the DNR includes recommendations for Blanding's turtles, but does not have accommodations for habitat for rusty patch bumblebees which are on the property despite not being part of the inventory for the DNR. Blanding's turtles (Emydoidea blandingii), a state -listed threatened species, have been reported from the vicinity of the proposed project, but outside of the one -mile radius, but may be encountered on site. Blanding's turtles use wetlands as well as upland areas up to and over a mile distant from wetlands. Uplands are used for nesting, basking, periods of dormancy, and traveling between wetlands. Factors believed to contribute to the decline of this species include collisions with vehicles, wetland drainage and degradation, and the development of upland habitat. Any added fatality can be detrimental to populations of Blanding's turtles, as these turtles have a low reproduction rate that depends upon a high survival rate to maintain population levels. This project has the potential to impact this rare turtle through direct fatalities or habitat disturbance/destruction due to dewatering, excavation, fill, or other construction activities associated with the project. Actions to avoid or minimize disturbance to this state -protected turtle may include, but are not limited to, the following recommendations: o Avoid Type 2 & 3 wetlands, To avoid any incidental takings, avoid filling or dewatering wetlands during the winter, o Implement stringent sediment and erosion control methods, Use wildlife -friendly erosion control methods, o Monitor for turtles during construction and report any sightings to the DNR, o Refer to the first list of recommendations in the enclosed Blanding's Turtle Fact Sheet. If greater protection for turtles is desired, the second list of recommendations can be implemented as well. The fact sheet contains specific recommendations regarding roads, utilities, and landscaping that will pertain to this project. o For further assistance regarding the Blanding's turtle, please contact the DNR Regional Nongame Specialist, Erica Hoaglund at 651-259-5772 or Erica. Hoaglund(a-)state. mn. us. There are 11 wet lands totaling 29 acres on the report, 4 acres are to be filled. In the report from WCSW there are more recorded than 11. There is some confusion which areas those are and if the project has any impact. The report states " there are eleven wetlands on the site"... then it goes on to say "5 of the ten impacted wetlands will be completely impacted, the other 5 will be partially filled" this accounting should be clarified in the responses and reflect the 14 noted by WCSW. From: Angela Schumann <Angela.Schumann@ci.monticello.mn.us> Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2018 8:05 AM To: Laura Wehr Subject: FW: EAW comments for the Haven Ridge project Angela Schumann Community Development Director City of Monticello www.ci.monticello.mn.us 763-271-3224 Email correspondence to and from the City of Monticello government office is subject to the Minnesota Government Data Practices act and may be disclosed to third parties. From: Shannon Bye <> Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2018 3:24 PM To: Angela Schumann <Angela.Schumann@ci.monticello.mn.us> Subject: EAW comments for the Haven Ridge project Thanks for the email yesterday, and the attachment. Please find below comments to be applied to the EAW discussion. The board has a set of comments coming, but just in case want to be certain the concerns are on record. Thanks in advance for you attention to this matter We looked & there were a couple unresolved issues or discrepancies one is in the road review, on the map(appendices figure 6) Nelson/Obrien noted as low density but in the written report they note no additional development (p28) This additional development will significantly impact the traffic study and should be addressed in the report where they are putting in roundabouts and re configuring roads taking control of Edmondson to 85 to Fallon traffic goes up to 3192 new total trips by the city's account There is a note for historical review that any data older than ten yrs should be re-evaluated and their data is from 1983, a known archaeological site is noted as adjacent to the project on the south east corner, and the city report acknowledges a potential need for follow up, with the proper department. In addition the state historic preservation office submitted the addition recommendations noted below which the township would like to see addressed and the data made available for further review Due to the nature and location of the proposed project, we recommend that a Phase I archaeological survey be completed. The survey must meet the requirements of the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Identification and Evaluation, and should include an evaluation of National Register eligibility for any properties that are identified. For a list of consultants who have expressed an interest in undertaking such surveys, please visit the website preservationdirectorv.mnhs.ora. and select "Archaeologists" in the "Search by Specialties" box. We will reconsider the need for survey if the project area can be documented as previously surveyed or disturbed. Any previous survey work must meet contemporary standards. Note: plowed areas and right-of-way are not automatically considered disturbed. Archaeological sites can remain intact beneath the plow zone and in undisturbed portions of the right-of-way, Please note that this comment letter does not address the requirements of Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 and 36 CFR $ 800. If this project is considered for federal financial assistance, or requires a federal permit or license, then review and consultation with our office will need to be initiated by the lead federal agency. Be advised that comments and recommendations provided by our office for this state -level review may differ from findings and determinations made by the federal agency as part of review and consultation under Section 106. There is 4 acre of 29 noted for wet land delineation but it is unclear as to the location of it relevant to the 29 acres identified, After contacting SWCD for additional information on that & wetland replacement (2:1) ration & the cities' proposed buffer as it impact twnshp residents on 117, it was determined that there were more than the # of wetlands initially reports, and that the total acreage is nearly ten acres more than noted in the report. The township board would like to know what the implications are to the other areas of the EAW with the corrected data. There is a "large public wetland noted" at the time of the report it is not documented that it was part of the wetland conservation act, we would like the documentation for that either way, that won't be established until wetland permitting process (p18) I have since spoken to Army Corp of Engineers and they will be sending a report to address wetland delineation late in November. Ponding and ground water issues are noted TBD as project moves forward, We were under the impression they needed to initially be presented in the EAW as well as service time lines for the phasing and accommodation of sewer and water capacity We are seeking input from the county as to where the boundary in Wright County currently is for the carbon -dioxide maintenance area, and a determination if the boundary includes this project under the most recent update. At the closing of the comments stage I had not received that information. The city states in their natural resource inventory the area is unsuitable habitat, but we don't know that, their data parallels the resource plan done by the county. We have concerns that the city had not included the potential of critical habitat for the rusty patched bumble bee, as part of its habitat impact statement. The form states that they were waiting for information. Currently it is listed by the city as "having no significant environmental impacts", without the DNR piece it was difficult to substantiate the claim. The DNR report became available this wk and is included below. The report from the DNR includes recommendations for Blanding's turtles, but does not have accommodations for habitat for rusty patch bumblebees which are on the property despite not being part of the inventory for the DNR. Blanding's turtles (Emydoidea blandingii), a state -listed threatened species, have been reported from the vicinity of the proposed project, but outside of the one -mile radius, but may be encountered on site. Blanding's turtles use wetlands as well as upland areas up to and over a mile distant from wetlands. Uplands are used for nesting, basking, periods of dormancy, and traveling between wetlands. Factors believed to contribute to the decline of this species include collisions with vehicles, wetland drainage and degradation, and the development of upland habitat. Any added fatality can be detrimental to populations of Blanding's turtles, as these turtles have a low reproduction rate that depends upon a high survival rate to maintain population levels. This project has the potential to impact this rare turtle through direct fatalities or habitat disturbance/destruction due to dewatering, excavation, fill, or other construction activities associated with the project. Actions to avoid or minimize disturbance to this state -protected turtle may include, but are not limited to, the following recommendations: o Avoid Type 2 & 3 wetlands, To avoid any incidental takings, avoid filling or dewatering wetlands during the winter, o Implement stringent sediment and erosion control methods, Use wildlife friendly erosion control methods, o Monitor for turtles during construction and report any sightings to the DNR, o Refer to the first list of recommendations in the enclosed Blanding's Turtle Fact Sheet. If greater protection for turtles is desired, the second list of recommendations can be implemented as well. The fact sheet contains specific recommendations regarding roads, utilities, and landscaping that will pertain to this project. o For further assistance regarding the Blanding's turtle, please contact the DNR Regional Nongame Specialist, Erica Hoaglund at 651-259-5772 or Erica.Hooalund@state.mn.us. There are 11 wet lands totaling 29 acres on the report, 4 acres are to be filled. In the report from WCSW there are more recorded than 11. There is some confusion which areas those are and if the project has any impact. The report states " there are eleven wetlands on the site"... then it goes on to say "5 of the ten impacted wetlands will be completely impacted, the other 5 will be partially filled" this accounting should be clarified in the responses and reflect the 14 noted by WCSW. T, CITY OF ..� • - M-O n Ice_ November 19th, 2018 Monticello Township Board of Supervisors 9550 Edmonson Avenue NE Monticello, MN 55362 PHONE: 763-295-2711 FAx:763-295-4404 505 Walnut Street I Suite 11 Monticello, MN 55362 RE: Haven Ridge Environmental Assessment Worksheet Dear Township Board of Supervisors, Thank you very much for providing comments during the 30 -day comment period for the Haven Ridge Environmental Assessment Worksheet. Please find enclosed a response to the comments, prepared by WSB & Associates, the City's consulting engineer and preparer of the EAW. The City Council will consider the next related decision on the environmental review, the Negative Declaration of Need to Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) on Monday, November 26th, 2018. Based on the review completed for the EAW, it will be staff's recommendation to issue the Negative Declaration of Need for EIS. Again, I appreciate your comments on this component of the project. I will continue to provide information on the proposed project's review progress and stay in touch regarding other public comment opportunities. Please do not hesitate to call or email with any questions on this matter. Sincerely, Communi elopment Director c: Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator Matthew Leonard, City Engineer/Public Works Director Laura Wehr, WSB & Associates Shibani Bisson, WSB & Associates www.ci.monticel lo.m mus Dear Monticello Township Board of Supervisors, We received your comments about the Haven Ridge Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW). We appreciate your interest in the project and participation in the EAW process. The EAW comment period ended on October 31, 2018. All comments received during the comment period are considered in determining the potential for significant environmental impacts. As part of the EAW process, comment responses are included in the record of decision document. The record of decision document will be sent to all commenters after November 26. Below are the responses to the comments you submitted for the project. We encourage you to use the answers provided to your comments in order to inform your community about the project and when participating in other comment periods related to the project. Comment 1: 1 am writing as Vice chair of Monticello Township board. I had emailed Ms. Schumann to attempt to have additional time to review the EAW. It was lacking information that the board considered relevant in the comment making process. An extension was not possible. I emailed a number of the organizations that were providing data. I was able to secure a number of the items and information the board would want to review. However we did not have another meeting set to do so, as the board meets the first and 3rd Mondays. The additional data was received on or after the 5th Monday of the month and did not allow for the board to thoroughly look those submissions over in addition to what has been submitted in the initial format of the EAW. The board would sill request additional time be made available with which to review the data that was referred to in the EAW but only recently has become available. Response 1: The EAW process timeline is set by the Environmental Quality Board (EQB). There is no opportunity to extend the comment period. While we understand the township's desire to review additional information, the EAW as it was published was determined to be complete. Completeness is determined by if project reviewers and commenters can make a decision based on the information provided in the EAW about significant environmental impacts. The EAW identified areas where the potential for environmental effects exist, but appropriate mitigation measures can be incorporated into the project plans and the required approvals and permits to mitigate these effects will be obtained. While the additional information provides more detailed information and can inform more specific mitigation measures, it does not change the potential for significant environmental impacts. Comment 2: We looked & there were a couple unresolved issues or discrepancies one is in the road review, on the map (appendices figure 6) Nelson/Obrien noted as low density but in the written report they note no additional development. This additional development will significantly impact the traffic study and should be addressed in the report where they are putting in roundabouts and re configuring roads taking control of Edmondson to 85 to Fallon traffic goes up to 3192 new total trips by the city's account. Response 2: The low density shown on Figure 6 is based on the City of Monticello's Comprehensive Plan designation for that area. The comprehensive plan is not indicative of any proposed or future development of that area. The comprehensive plan is a long term guiding document. The response to Question 19 of the EAW notes correctly that no additional development proposal for the surrounding area have been submitted or discussed with the City. Question 19 also states that the has been some interest in development adjacent to this site, but no specific projects or project proposers have been identified. Question 19 is specifically asking about specific projects that have been identified. So both Figure 6 and the response to Question 19 are correct because they are asking about development in the area over two different time periods. The traffic study accounts for future development assuming a typical 2% per year growth rate which is based on County State Aid traffic projection factors. Additional traffic analyses are considered when individual developments are proposed. There is no current proposal for the Nelson/Obrien sites at this time, therefore the traffic study uses the 2% per year growth rate assumption when providing recommendations for roadway and intersection improvements. Comment 3: There is a note for historical review that any data older than ten yrs should be re- evaluated and their data is from 1983, a known archaeological site is noted as adjacent to the project on the south east corner, and the city report acknowledges a potential need for follow up, with the proper department. In additional the state historic preservation office submitted the addition recommendations noted below which the township would like to see addressed and the data made available for further review. Response 3: The City and the developer are aware of State Historic Preservation Office's (SHPO) comments. The following response is being provided to SHPO about their comment: The developer is aware if the project obtains federal financial assistance or requires a federal permit or licenses, that coordination with SHPO will be initiated by the lead federal agency. As stated in the EAW and this document, the project will likely require a permit from the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). The developer is aware that USACE may require a Phase 1 archeological survey as part of the wetland permit issued by the USACE. The developer is prepared to address the Phase 1 archeological survey as part of a federal permit for the project". Comment 4: There is 4 acre of 29 notes for wet land delineation but it is unclear as to the location of it relevant to the 29 acres identified. After contacting SWCD for additional information on that & wetland replacement (2:1) ration & the cities' proposed buffer as it impact twnshp residents on 117, it was determined that there was more than the # of wetlands initially reports, and that the total acreage is nearly ten acres more than noted in the report. The township board would like to know what the implications are to the other areas of the EAW with the corrected data. Response 4: The information about wetlands in the EAW was completed using the preliminary wetland delineation. On October 31, 2018 the SWCD issued the final wetland delineation approval which includes additional wetland areas and changes to wetlands from the preliminary wetland delineation. The wetland delineation approval occurred after the EAW was published. The approved wetland delineation identified 14 wetlands within the project area. The preliminary wetland delineation identified 11 wetlands within the project area. The 11 wetlands in the preliminary wetland delineation were also identified in the approved wetland delineation. The approved wetland delineation identified three additional wetlands that were not part of the preliminary wetland delineation. The three additional wetlands increases the acreage of wetlands currently present within the project area from 29 acres to 29.24 acres. The SWCD wetland delineation approval was distributed after the EAW was published so it was not available at the time the EAW was published. As part of the EAW process, the published EAW is considered final and is not updated. The permitting requirements including wetland buffers and mitigation for wetland impacts identified in the EAW are still correct therefore the additional 0.24 acres of potential wetland impact do not change the EAW finding's related to wetlands. Comment 5: There is a "large public wetland noted" at the time of the report it is not documented that it was part of the wetland conservation act, we would like the documentation for that either way, that won't be established until wetland permitting process (pl8) 1 have since spoken to Army Corp of Engineers and they will be sending a report to address wetland delineation late in November. Response 5: Comment noted. As mentioned in the EAW, it is unknown at this time if any of the impact wetlands are outside of regulation by either the Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) or USACE Section 404. The jurisdictional status will be determined during the wetland permitting process. Additionally, the DNR will review their jurisdiction of the public water wetland as part of their permitting process. Comment 6: Ponding and ground water issues are noted TBD as project moves forward, We were under the impression they needed to initially be presented in the EAW as well as service time lines for the phasing and accommodation of sewer and water capacity Response 6: The EAW identifies the quantity and quality of stormwater runoff at the project site prior to and post construction. The EAW also identifies requirements for the stormwater runoff including ponding requirements and necessary sizes of ponds. The specific location and design of the ponds are outside of the EAW process. Ponds and related stormwater systems will be reviewed by the City as part of their approval process. As stated in the EAW, the development will be required to connect to the City of Monticello's sewer and water systems. Information about sewer and water capacity related to the additional demand by the development on the City's existing system is included in the EAW document. Service timelines for phasing is outside of the EAW process. The City will be reviewing phasing as part of their approval process. Comment 7: We are seeking input from the county as to where the boundary in Wright County currently is for the carbon -dioxide maintenance area, and a determination if the boundary includes this project under the most recent update. At the closing of the comment stage I had not received that information. Response 7: The project area is outside of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) designed carbon monoxide maintenance area. Comment 8: The city states in their natural resources inventory the area is unsuitable habitat, but we don't know that, their data parallels the resource plan done by the county. We have concerns that the city had not included the potential of critical habitat for the rusty patched bumble bee, as part of its habitat impact statement. The form states that they were waiting for information. Currently it is listed by the city as "having no significant environmental impacts", without the DNR piece it was difficult to substantiate the claim. The DNR report became available this wk and is included below. Response 8: The EAW states that "the current site is mostly unsuitable habitat" in reference to the fact that the majority of project area is in agricultural production. Agricultural production areas are documented to have low existing habitat value and would not provide suitable habitat for fish, wildlife, plant communities, or rare features or ecosystems. The EAW also states that the areas that provide habitat to wildlife are expected to be avoided. The statements made about habitat in the EAW are correct and substantiated. Please see Response 9 for the response to rusty patched bumble bees. Comment 9: The report from the DNR includes recommendations for Blanding's turtles, but does not have accommodations for habitat for rusty patch bumblebees which are on the property despite not being part of the inventory for the DNR. Response 9: The DNR regulates state listed species. The rusty patched bumble is not a state listed species so it outside of the DNR's regulations. The rusty patched bumble bee is a federally listed species regulated by the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). The USFWS published guidance for project proposers on how to evaluate if the project requires additional review for the rusty patched bumble bee. The guidance instructs the project proposer to review the map of where rusty patched bumble bee may be present that USFWS developed and determine if your project is in a high potential zone. If the project is not in a high potential zone, no further action is needed. The City followed this guidance and found that the Haven Ridge project area is classified as an area where rusty patched bumble bee is not present and have not been observed or collected in these areas since before the year 2000. This classification is not the high potential zone. According to the USFWS guidance, no further action is needed. At this time, no further action related to the rusty patched bumble bee will be taken. The project's effect on the rusty patched bumble bee will also be evaluated as part of any federal permit or action that the project requires. The federal agencies involved in the federal permit or action will identify measures the project would need to take related to the rusty patched bumble bee if they determine these measures are necessary. Comment 10: There are 11 wet land totaling 29 acres on the report, 4 acres are to be filled. In the report from WCSW there are more recorded than 11. There is some confusion which areas those are and if the project has any impact. The report states " there are eleven wetlands on the site" ... then it goes on to say "5 of the ten impacted wetlands will be completed impacted, the other 5 will be partially filled" this accounting should be clarified in the responses and reflect the 14 noted by WCSW. Response 10: As noted in Response 4, the number of wetlands was updated after the EAW was completed and published. As part of the EAW process, the published EAW is considered final and is not updated but information can be incorporated into the record of decision as part of the findings process with the EAW. The number of wetlands has been clarified in Response 4. The permitting requirements including wetland buffers and mitigation for wetland impacts identified in the EAW are still correct therefore the additional 0.24 acres of potential wetland impact do not change the EAW finding's related to wetlands. This has been included in the record of decision. Monticello Council Connection November 26, 2018 MCH Y OF ntfcdo COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Downtown Project Update Attached is a summary provided to the EDA regarding activities supporting the Downtown Monticello Small Area Plan. Council can also read more regarding the CCD Ordinance Amendments here. Planning Commission tabled and continued the item at its November meeting to allow for additional revisions and clarifications requested by the Commission. Bertram Chain of Lakes Update Staff is providing additional detail to the verbal report provided to Council on November 12 regarding the November 2, 2018 BCOL Advisory Council meeting. The BCOL campground project has been preliminarily recommended for $2.3 million in Parks & Trails Legacy grant funding. Funding recommendations will be finalized at the end of November, then move forward to the legislature for final approval. The goal will be to complete a phased project, with construction beginning in 2020 and a tentative opening of the first phase in 2022. The Advisory Council also heard a presentation on the draft Traffic Study by WSB & Associates. Based on comments from staff and the Advisory Council, the report will be revised. The report will then be reviewed by the County Board, City Council and representatives from the Township in January 2019. Council will receive notice on the meeting data as soon as available. Safe Routes to School Rapid Planning Session The project consultant for the Safe Routes Plan, ALTA, has scheduled the first workshop associated with the planning effort. The Rapid Planning Sessions are set to occur on Thursday and Friday, December 6 and 7. Council member Fair will be serving as the Council representative to the SRTS community team. Other members include representatives from the school district (as grant lead), CentraCare, SHIP, Wright County Sheriff's office, Wright County Board, MnDOT and city staff. Greater MN Parks & Trails Update The City of Monticello is a member of the Greater MN Parks & Trails organization, whose mission is to improve the quality of life for the citizens of Minnesota by providing areas for recreational opportunities, and promoting legislative support, Council Connection -11/26/18 funding opportunities, and networking for regional parks and trails throughout Greater Minnesota. Council will recall that this organization was instrumental in securing a fair funding formula for greater Minnesota parks and trails in the allocation of Legacy dollars. The funding was critical in the acquisition of the Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional parkland and continues to serve as funding source for the natural -resource based projects at the park. The group held their annual meeting in October, which staff attended. A copy of the adopted legislative policies and agenda for 2019 is attached for Council reference. Community Visioning, Strategic Planning & Comprehensive Planning Staff has begun drafting the request for proposals for the 2019-2020 comprehensive planning process. Staff hopes to bring an RFP to Council in January for review. Greater Minnesota Parks and Trails Legislative Policies 2019 0, ' ft..' I . 1. A strong and vibrant regional parks and trails system plays a vital role in the continued health and economic growth of greater Minnesota. Greater Minnesota Parks and Trails (GMPT) supports a Legacy Amendment parks and trails funding formula that allocates at minimum 20% of the total funds to regional parks and trails of Greater Minnesota. 2. Local parks and trails are crucial resources that enhance the vitality of communities throughout the state, but communities often lack the money to invest in these resources. The Local Trails Connection Program, Outdoor Recreation Grant Program and Natural and Scenic Area Program provide communities with financial assistance, but these programs have been historically underfunded. The GMPT supports increasing the funding for these programs and any other programs that support local and regional parks in Minnesota. 3. The Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission has engaged in a rigorous process to evaluate and designate regional parks and trails and to make recommendations for how the Legacy funds for Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails should be appropriated. The GMPT supports awarding the grants in accordance with these recommendations. 4. The Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission plays a vital role in implementing a statewide system of regional parks and trails in Greater Minnesota. The GMPT supports finding a stable funding source for the Commission that does not reduce the Legacy funds available for Greater Minnesota parks and trails projects. 5. The GMPT urges the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission to takes steps to ensure that designations of regional parks and trails and grant proposals achieve an equitable statewide distribution. Such distribution may take more than one legislative cycle to occur. 6. Creating or upgrading parks or trails often requires a variety of tools for land and easement acquisition. The GMPT opposes efforts to restrict or remove the tools currently available to local governments for these purposes. 7. The GMPT supports changes to state agency rules and policies rules to allow small cities that have the capacity to manage parks, trails, and natural resources grants and projects to do so without the sponsorship of another city or county. Adopted by the Greater Minnesota Parks & Trails Membership GRFAIERlAINNESOTA PARKS &TRAILS Greater Minnesota Parks and Trails Legislative Agenda 2019 1. Greater Minnesota Parks and Trails (GMPT) supports enacting a Legacy Amendment parks and trails funding formula into statute that allocates at minimum 20% of the total funds to regional parks and trails of Greater Minnesota and will oppose any efforts to diminish Greater Minnesota's share. GMPT further supports allocating all funds above a threshold based on previous years' allocations equally between Greater Minnesota, Metropolitan Parks and the Department of Natural Resources. 2. The GMPT supports a general fund appropriation to pay for the operating costs of the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission 3. The GMPT supports the Legislative -Citizens Commission on Minnesota Resources recommendation for $3 million to fund the Local Trail Connections, Outdoor Recreation, and Natural and Scenic Area grant programs. 4. Greater Minnesota Parks and Trails (GMPT) supports an appropriation of at least $1,000,000 to the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) to fund the Local Trails Connection Program and Outdoor Recreation Grant Program. Adopted by the Greater Minnesota Parks & Trails Membership EDA Agenda: 10/10/18 8. Update on Downtown Monticello Project Efforts (AS) REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND To follow is an update on various projects occurring in the downtown area funded by the EDA or City Council. A similar update will appear in the upcoming City newsletter. In support of the Downtown Monticello Small Area Plan's goal to "Shift the center to Walnut & Broadway", the City has initiated the following: • Launched the Music on the Mississippi series, a summer concert series at West Bridge park. From June — August, three well-known local bands drew crowds into the downtown on a Thursday evening. The goal will be to increase the number of Music on the Mississippi events next summer. • Designed and distributed the new "Summer Happiness Guide" highlighting activities and events in the downtown, many of which occur along the Walnut and Broadway corridors. These great summer events included the brand new Music on the Mississippi concert series, Brewfest, Taste of the Towns and much more. • The Monticello Arts Initiative, as well as Community Development, Communications, and Public Works staff supported the City's first ever streetlight banner contest. The contest invited the community to submit art designs for the new banners, which will replace the existing streetlight banners along Pine, Broadway and Walnut Streets. Nine designs were selected to move forward and the new banners will be going up along the corridors before the end of the year. • The streetscape downtown will also see the painting of streetlights themselves, as well as the decorative bridge rail elements scattered along the corridor in Mississippi Bronze color. In addition to the new paint treatment, the streetlight fixtures along Broadway will be updated to match the lantern style along Walnut Street. • The City approved development of a Walnut Corridor Concept Plan. The plan focuses on Walnut Street from 5th Street (at the MCC) to River Street, and looks at the connection between Walnut and River Street. The plan provides recommendations for art space, pathway and sidewalk improvements, street improvements, and event space which respond directly to the investment and implementation strategies called out by the Downtown Small Area Plan. The plan can be implemented in phases as traffic (both pedestrian/cycle and vehicle) increases in the downtown, as reinvestment and redevelopment offer opportunities to make improvements, and as funding is available. The City Council and EDA held a workshop on the plan in summer 2018 and the Council held a follow-up workshop in September. The plan will be brought forward for acceptance in October or November, 2018. • In concert with the recommendations of the Walnut Corridor Plan and Small Area Plan, the proposed 2019 City budget includes funding for curb extensions at Walnut & Broadway, the realignment of the curb at the southeast corner of the EDA Agenda: 10/10/18 Walnut & Broadway intersection (to provide additional plaza space near the Cornerstone Cafe property), and completion of a pedestrian ramp from the Walnut Street parking lot to River Street with new crosswalk and sidewalk into West Bridge Park. Staff attended the Music on the Mississippi events over the summer, engaging participants on their ideas and suggestions for the area and gauging support for the proposal. To encourage reinvestment in downtown buildings, spur new economic growth, and keep existing business properties looking their best, the Economic Development Authority authorized a pilot Downtown Fagade Improvement Grant program in August. All property owners within the geographic focus area have expressed some level of interest in the program, with seven of the ten submitting letter of interest to date. Meeting between the property owners and the Cuningham group on design will occur in mid- to late October. The goal is to plan over the fall and winter months for spring construction projects. The Monticello City Council and Planning Commission have held two joint workshops for the purpose of input on development of the Central Community District ordinances, which are required to be amended to provide regulations in support of the Downtown Plan. It is anticipated that the ordinances will be presented for hearing at Planning Commission in November. The Planning Commission and City Council have made it clear in the workshops that they would like to see a parking accumulation and utilization study and better public parking signage to help address parking issues in the downtown. The Monticello Arts Initiative, buoyed by the efforts of City Arts Consultant Sue Seeger, was successful in securing a grant which resulted in the "Shimmer Wall" at the southeast corner of T25/CSAH 75, as well as the first-ever Creative City Celebration held on Walnut Street. Ms. Seeger has also been working to build relationships in the Monticello arts community, with local organizations, businesses, and schools. Her work has helped to drive the interest in the re -use of the Fred's Auto building for the Arts Initiative, and the display of student photography in the downtown businesses. Also initiated over the summer was the "Downtown Rounds" roundtable forum. The purpose of the Downtown Rounds is to encourage conversation amongst property owners and businesses in the downtown and help create a space for questions and answers regarding downtown activity, The first Round was held August 91h at Lucille Murray's School of Dance. There were almost 40 people in attendance, with great discussion on Art, Block 52 and other EDA properties downtown, and public improvement projects. September 20th's event was less well -attended, but participants provided valuable feedback regarding Block 52 redevelopment. In 2019, the plan will be to host these events quarterly. Staff also hopes to prepare a downtown news update that will summarize the Rounds and provide additional activity updates. EDA Agenda: 10/10/18 The EDA will note that many of these projects support other of the four main goals of the Small Area Plan: "Improve the Pine Street Experience for Everyone", "Make Small and Medium -Sized investments" and "Become a Rivertown Again". Staff will continue to work to bring to the EDA and City Council projects and initiatives consistent with the Downtown Small Area plan in the coming months. CITY OF mo�ii�effo COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Below is a summary of recently attended meetings: October 22, 2018 - Rotary Club Mtg. October 26, 2018 - Block 35 Property Owners Bldg. Walkthrough October 29, 2018 - Rotary Club Mtg. November 1-2 - MN -DEED Redevelopment Conference in St. Cloud, MN November 5, 2018 - Rotary Club Mtg. November 14, 2018 - Meeting with Development Prospect November 8, 2018 - Wright County Econ. Dev. Partnership Mtg. Rockford, MN November 15, 2018 - TigerPath Workforce Conference, Hutchinson, MN November 19, 2018 - Rotary Club Mtg. November 19, 2018 - Briggs Housing Project Groundbreaking Event November 20, 2018 - Chamber of Commerce Luncheon Mtg. November 20, 2018 - Meeting with Development Prospect CITY OF Montieffo DMV October 2018, DMV year-to-date revenue is $600,195.57 an increase of $112,018.94 or 22.9% over the same period last year. Please see the following graphs for more detail. $60,000 $50,000 $40,000 $30,000 $20,000 $10,000 10,000 9,000 8,000 7,000 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 $700,000 $600,000 $500,000 $400,000 $300,000 $200,000 $100,000 120,000 100,000 80,000 60,000 40,000 20,000 DMV Revenue Comparison $51,622 Oct 2011 Oct 2012 Oct 2013 Oct 2014 Oct 2015 Oct 2016 Oct 2017 Oct 2018 DMV Transaction Comparison 9,121 Oct 2011 Oct 2012 Oct 2013 Oct 2014 Oct 2015 Oct 2016 Oct 2017 Oct 2018 DMV Year -to -Date Revenue Comparison $600,196 Oct 2011 Oct 2012 Oct 2013 Oct 2014 Oct 2015 Oct 2016 Oct 2017 Oct 2018 DMV Year -to -Date Transaction Comparison 103,998 Oct 2011 Oct 2012 Oct 2013 Oct 2014 Oct 2015 Oct 2016 Oct 2017 Oct 2018 CITY OF Monticello FINANCE DEPARTMENT New Resident Notice In November, the Finance Department began using a postcard to provide notice to residents when their credit cards decline. Previously, customers received an automatically generated email from the billing system notifying them of the need to update their credit card information. Because of the automated nature of the email's sender, these emails can be easily overlooked or mistaken as spam. This new postcard will be in addition to the email. The notice is printed on colored cardstock to draw attention to it. In addition, the postcard format is both cost efficient and an effective way to reach customers. A sample of the postcard is provided below: ' Monti"cillo RESIDENT NOTICE Dear Valued Utility Customer, The credit card information for your city utility account needs to be updated. A recent payment did not process. Please visit www.ci.monticello.mmus and click on "Pay My Utility Bill" to login to your account. Use the "Manage your Account" option to update your information for future bills. Additional menu options let you check the balance on your account and make a one-time payment. Please leave a message at 753-271-3228 if you have questions. Thank yo u, The Monticello Utility Department CHYOFJ-MontlCello HI -WAY LIQUORS Sales through October 31, 2018 Attached is the data for total sales in each major category through the end of October 2018. Hi -Way Liquors Sales Report 10/31/2018 Total Sales Month 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Jan $ 249,670.43 $ 316,280.10 $ 300,631.85 $ 296,838.64 $ 302,114.52 $ 328,004.13 $ 355,029.76 $ 380,425.45 $ 364,675.32 $ 356,295.18 $ 403,520.92 Feb 255,440.36 284,988.38 285,584.50 315,239.00 307,385.41 337,923.99 333,487.18 347,777.77 362,746.98 364,836.39 390,050.52 Mar 295,257.14 318,050.39 324,062.21 335,032.60 388,195.21 408,071.17 377,391.62 388,003.16 401,256.91 417,005.50 473,811.33 Apr 281,365.81 346,738.34 369,112.88 389,543.24 347,321.09 388,395.50 389,250.82 421,280.89 428,729.44 448,141.63 467,192.12 May 377,177.10 384,337.08 399,489.67 409,309.12 433,829.01 436,195.21 498,095.67 523,401.05 482,917.95 503,867.81 549,206.70 Jun 350,727.93 381,782.23 377,458.15 409,726.07 461,423.68 440,255.04 426,392.73 474,203.81 470,585.33 521,559.76 561,287.34 Jul 409,870.50 430,838.23 466,122.69 466,738.15 447,452.18 485,459.76 479,174.06 542,973.27 527,519.46 563,935.31 571,270.49 Aug 409,575.96 383,523.07 386,245.30 408,734.83 445,158.94 503,181.84 484,955.71 470,505.22 462,669.36 497,201.21 544,029.21 Sep 317,846.07 346,900.80 346,557.62 373,719.64 390,399.33 379,381.19 397,495.82 439,444.29 448,218.93 501,126.67 481,663.70 Oct 351,268.98 360,742.04 375,367.40 365,702.14 372,676.23 396,328.87 409,967.74 460,096.82 454,442.30 461,549.38 467,600.32 Nov 332,605.88 341,875.49 360,661.96 376,855.40 421,960.12 424,038.37 465,299.53 474,241.74 444,533.08 495,519.24 - Dec 436,379.03 454,982.63 485,617.01 505,482.70 527,865.36 518,379.58 549,200.76 569,707.38 605,509.16 629,143.57 Total $ 4,067,185.19 $ 4,351,038.78 $ 4,476,911.24 $ 4,652,921.53 $ 4,845,781.08 $ 5,045,614.65 $ 5,165,741.40 $ 5,492,060.85 $ 5,453,804.22 $ 5,760,181.65 $ 4,909,632.65 Change $ 283,853.59 $ 125,872.46 $ 176,010.29 $ 192,859.55 $ 199,833.57 $ 120,126.75 $ 326,319.45 $ (38,256.63) $ 306,377.43 $ (850,549.00) Change % 7.0% 2.9% 3.9% 4.1% 4.1% 2.4% 6.3% -0.7% 5.6% -14.8% 4,173,969.46 735,663.19 $700,000 $600,000 $500,000 $400,000 r $300,000 _ I $200,000 $100,000 Jan Feb Mar Monthly Hi -Way Sales Apr May Jun JulAug Sep Oct Nov Dec ■ 2008 ■ 2009 ■ 2010 ■ 2011 ■ 2012 ■ 2013 ■ 2014 ■ 2015 ■ 2017 ■ 2018 CYM-LYM 13.3% 6.9% 13.6% 4.3% 9.0% 7.6% 1.3% 9.4% -3.9% 1.3% Y -T -D 13.3% 10.0% 11.4% 9.3% 9.3% 8.9% 7.6% 7.8% 6.4% 5.9% Hi -Way Liquors Sales Report 10/31/2018 Beer Month 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Jan $ 122,218.36 $ 157,849.78 $ 146,246.32 $ 143,906.08 $ 149,406.45 $ 160,903.32 $ 173,814.13 $ 191,370.26 $ 176,483.68 $ 174,846.99 $ 198,202.11 Feb 121,734.33 137,055.23 140,624.54 150,075.08 150,589.28 162,865.75 161,168.63 164,508.11 175,055.27 179,346.12 187,042.58 Mar 138,889.05 155,196.13 164,157.70 163,595.55 203,957.25 192,607.52 185,325.68 192,955.79 199,141.66 208,926.70 233,971.24 Apr 146,613.65 178,834.20 189,978.23 194,504.16 179,486.77 186,134.31 198,195.77 219,756.39 228,133.10 234,069.51 224,348.27 May 201,232.14 210,097.48 223,678.47 208,963.65 227,664.73 234,738.30 256,188.77 259,306.91 250,403.11 262,275.25 306,245.55 Jun 193,801.97 207,793.83 206,043.42 224,769.03 259,671.21 243,389.79 238,322.11 263,421.95 263,264.15 296,531.85 309,163.93 Jul 226,317.96 229,199.79 260,971.50 258,734.60 253,648.64 273,319.54 265,555.32 301,867.65 296,513.68 315,848.83 314,343.95 Aug 226,653.65 203,222.86 211,996.32 216,546.53 242,179.20 281,577.25 267,802.95 253,141.21 250,255.41 268,173.42 292,626.23 Sep 166,679.60 183,586.32 183,865.70 199,170.24 208,974.88 202,213.80 211,854.94 233,215.56 238,333.55 270,898.13 257,557.44 Oct 176,382.34 179,873.10 190,893.27 180,043.06 187,386.57 191,764.20 210,454.13 234,882.09 224,253.93 228,484.62 230,112.85 Nov 158,322.50 154,584.13 168,265.14 171,866.27 195,276.37 192,162.71 202,081.91 207,055.40 213,333.23 222,993.99 - Dec 187,691.06 190,655.19 203,080.13 216,560.71 224,952.83 217,491.21 234,178.12 241,996.27 253,223.11 271,457.72 Total $ 2,066,536.61 $ 2,187,948.04 $ 2,289,800.74 $ 2,328,734.96 $ 2,483,194.18 $ 2,539,167.70 $ 2,604,942.46 $ 2,763,477.59 $ 2,768,393.88 $ 2,933,853.13 $ 2,553,614.15 Change $ 121,411.43 $ 101,852.70 $ 38,934.22 $ 154,459.22 $ 55,973.52 $ 65,774.76 $ 158,535.13 $ 4,916.29 $ 165,459.25 $ (380,238.98) Change % 5.9% 4.7% 1.7% 6.6% 2.3% 2.6% 6.1% 0.2% 6.0% -13.0% Monthly Beer Sales $350,000 $300,000 $250,000 $200,000 $150,000 $100,000 $50,000 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct ■ 2008 ■ 2009 ■ 2010 ■ 2011 ■ 2012 ■ 2013 ■ 2014 ■ 2015 ■ 2017 ■ 2018 Nov Dec CYM-LYM 13.4% 4.3% 12.0% -4.2% 16.8% 4.3% -0.5% 9.1% -4.9% 0.7% Y -T -D 13.4% 8.8% 10.0% 5.8% 8.5% 7.6% 6.1% 6.5% 5.1% 4.7% Hi -Way Liquors Sales Report 10/31/2018 Liquor Month 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Jan $ 73,930.87 $ 92,370.42 $ 91,472.50 $ 91,279.01 $ 93,085.69 $ 103,977.89 $ 113,943.25 $ 118,577.85 $ 118,211.20 $ 114,509.99 $ 133,589.33 Feb 74,261.89 83,513.27 85,484.92 96,541.21 92,489.93 106,387.16 107,609.55 112,198.85 113,060.59 117,361.15 128,952.50 Mar 78,870.42 88,569.65 93,133.42 101,047.04 112,244.43 124,487.55 116,316.49 118,269.49 118,839.79 131,238.09 151,716.52 Apr 76,735.80 90,627.19 95,025.54 110,898.81 98,080.67 113,594.37 115,579.47 123,841.34 126,073.89 130,114.53 136,883.13 May 103,409.29 102,041.75 106,395.62 111,586.59 114,299.35 127,622.31 135,370.38 140,116.66 129,009.36 142,237.28 160,936.65 Jun 91,805.81 103,580.02 102,086.20 115,136.72 128,604.32 124,019.90 120,291.71 136,716.81 135,763.26 147,813.59 168,769.36 J u I 105,782.85 118,883.98 122,861.98 130,624.19 123,672.73 139,270.04 139,967.77 155,436.54 150,173.35 160,220.37 170,108.99 Aug 106,489.25 103,977.01 101,487.43 113,869.37 126,065.14 141,197.73 138,660.76 136,440.40 135,841.14 144,263.78 164,013.08 Sep 88,448.34 94,335.50 94,528.17 103,373.64 109,153.56 107,605.71 115,119.19 129,195.42 130,101.01 143,252.37 147,649.35 Oct 97,046.60 102,236.90 102,983.14 103,533.14 106,326.73 116,677.74 124,271.15 140,198.97 128,290.50 145,864.34 150,852.02 Nov 97,348.39 90,996.73 102,298.02 105,501.75 120,127.29 126,412.24 134,241.85 132,261.11 134,208.12 149,468.96 - Dec 135,221.23 143,684.12 153,690.60 159,717.50 172,370.96 175,523.36 184,746.26 190,944.24 205,335.83 213,217.73 Total $ 1,129,350.74 $ 1,214,816.54 $ 1,251,447.54 $ 1,343,108.97 $ 1,396,520.80 $ 1,506,776.00 $ 1,546,117.83 $ 1,634,197.68 $ 1,624,908.04 $ 1,739,562.18 $ 1,513,470.93 Change $ 85,465.80 $ 36,631.00 $ 91,661.43 $ 53,411.82 $ 110,255.21 $ 39,341.83 $ 88,079.85 $ (9,289.64) $ 114,654.14 $ (226,091.25) Change % 7.6% 3.0% 7.3% 4.0% 7.9% 2.6% 5.7% -0.6% 7.1% -13.0% Monthly Liquor Sales $250,000 ■ 2008 $200,000■ 2009 ■ 2010 $150,000 ■ 2011 ' ■ 2012 r $100,000 r ■ 2013 ■ 2014 $50,0002015 ■ 2017 $_ ■ 2018 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec CYM-LYM 16.7% 9.9% 15.6% 5.2% 13.1% 14.2% 6.2% 13.7% 3.1% 3.4% Y -T -D 16.7% 13.2% 14.1% 11.7% 12.1% 12.5% 11.4% 11.7% 10.7% 9.9% Hi -Way Liquors Sales Report 10/31/2018 Wine Month 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Jan $ 30,700.42 $ 41,810.19 $ 43,324.18 $ 48,437.59 $ 50,238.83 $ 54,949.83 $ 59,391.16 $ 61,128.65 $ 60,454.56 $ 57,275.16 $ Feb 33,407.17 39,410.85 42,230.84 52,847.05 54,642.27 60,573.12 57,228.51 62,600.47 64,797.38 58,664.45 Mar 47,603.93 45,525.38 46,165.18 54,639.16 57,735.22 77,810.58 66,425.24 67,121.51 71,840.82 64,286.75 Apr 31,755.42 48,303.48 61,146.04 62,289.18 57,973.74 79,736.19 63,101.05 63,285.56 61,268.24 69,415.79 May 38,522.75 40,963.86 45,733.08 68,701.95 78,740.40 62,491.07 92,083.62 109,512.94 87,333.35 82,724.29 Jun 31,796.95 37,522.00 44,211.14 49,089.65 56,607.74 59,523.15 54,270.56 59,036.14 54,889.39 58,623.08 Jul 36,909.44 41,813.65 48,334.93 49,664.45 54,467.20 57,115.44 57,743.98 66,029.11 60,750.62 64,034.24 Aug 35,932.62 41,333.00 46,871.28 53,172.68 61,825.30 64,057.61 62,446.04 63,546.01 60,015.78 66,304.12 Sep 33,830.69 39,798.20 47,859.52 53,916.37 60,317.17 59,121.12 59,409.30 62,210.27 65,294.31 68,220.79 Oct 45,750.04 48,422.79 58,081.87 60,949.40 66,423.82 75,606.28 63,659.41 70,038.32 89,005.29 70,516.61 Nov 50,106.64 66,331.86 71,928.30 85,933.28 97,249.52 96,824.40 117,402.23 122,947.90 83,896.45 109,969.88 Dec 75,866.80 84,285.84 101,676.19 109,267.01 116,610.70 113,008.24 115,617.50 120,274.96 129,536.28 124,115.79 Total $ 492,182.87 $ 575,521.10 $ 657,562.55 $ 748,907.77 $ 812,831.91 $ 860,817.03 $ 868,778.60 $ 927,731.84 $ 889,082.47 $ 894,150.95 $ Change $ 83,338.23 $ 82,041.45 $ 91,345.22 $ 63,924.14 $ 47,985.12 $ 7,961.57 $ 58,953.24 $ (38,649.37) $ 5,068.48 $ Change % 16.9% 14.3% 13.9% 8.5% 5.9% 0.9% 6.8% -4.2% 0.6% $140,000 $120,000 $100,000 $80,000 $60,000 $40,000 $20,000 Monthly Wine Sales Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun _I Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2018 60,047.20 62,027.36 74,221.20 93,299.96 61,684.97 61,777.09 64,494.29 67,701.51 59,923.84 70,894.54 676,071.96 (218,078.99) -24.4% ■ 2008 ■ 2009 ■ 2010 ■ 2011 ■ 2012 ■ 2013 ■ 2014 ■ 2015 ■ 2017 ■ 2018 CYM-LYM Y -T -D 4.8% 4.8% 5.7% 5.3% 15.5% 8.9% 34.4% 16.0% -25.4% 5.7% 5.4% 5.6% 0.7% 5.0% 2.1% 4.6% -12.2% 2.7% 0.5% 2.4% CA c 0 $6.5 $6.0 $5.5 $5.0 $4.5 $4.0 $3.5 $3.0 Liquor Store Sales - Rolling 12 Month Periods C K K c N z v�� C— �' z v c` �' z v o o c` �' z v c �' z v K K c �' z v K K c V z v K K c �' z v c` �' z v c` cn =3 v v— o� v v— o v v— o� v v— v v— � v v— o� v v— o� v v— o v v— o� v v— l0 O F` N W Ln Cl V 00 7� CH Y OF ntfcdo MONTICELLO COMMUNITY CENTER Transactions and visits Year to date (10.31.18), the MCC processed 70,110 transactions, which is 7,581 fewer transactions from last year. The MCC year to date revenue is $1,423,494, which is an increase of $78,889 from 2017. Year to date member visits are 111,200 compared to 111,331 last year. We finished out the month of October with 5,220 members compared to 5,423 in 2017. Programs and events • The first indoor Farmers Market of the season occurred on November 3, with ten vendors present in the main hallway of the community center. It was a very busy day at the MCC with the Women of Today Craft Show in the gymnasium and the Senior Center Craft Show in the Mississippi Room. • The community center is gearing up for our busy season. We have been busy hiring and training new staff. • Our second special Yin Yoga class at the Bertram Chalet on November 17 was sold out again with 20 participants. • Participation during public skate at the Moose Sherritt Ice Arena is increasing. We have been seeing an even split among members and users paying a daily fee. Public skate is scheduled most Sundays and some times during non - school days. • A special fitness class "Getting Buff to Stuff" will be offered on Thanksgiving Day at 7:00 a.m. The facility will be closed except for class participants and the class requires pre -registration. 140000 120000 100000 80000 60000 40000 20000 0 $1,600,000 $1,400,000 $1,200,000 $1,000,000 $800,000 $600,000 $400,000 $200,000 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 MCC 10/31 YTD Activity YTD Transactions YTD Member Visits ■ 2016 ■ 2017 ■ 2018 MCC 10/31 YTD Revenue 0 201 0 201 0 201 MCC 10/31 Members ■ 2016 ■ 2017 ■ 2018 Council Connection -11/26/18 M04CH Y OF icella PARKS DEPARTMENT The Parks Department's primary goal is to maintain the City's park and pathway facilities which include cemeteries, picnic shelters, playgrounds, sports fields, etc. Here are a few of the key items that have been happening within the Parks Department: • Chipping requests • Cemetery; selling and locating graves • Locating Riverside grave lot pins • Equipment/vehicle repairs • Park rental setups • Routine building maintenance • Chipping Requests • Snow plowing • Blow outs • Outdoor Rink prep • Warming House cleaning • Holiday Decorations • Snow fence install Updates: Fred's/Arts building: Staff sought quotes from individual contractors for the repairs at the Fred's building. Staff will present quotes at a future meeting with city council. STREETS DEPARTMENT The Streets Department's primary goal is to maintain the City's roadway network, which includes the storm water infrastructure, in a safe and efficient manner. Here are a few of the key items that have been happening within the Streets Department: • Black top repairs on School Boulevard and Ramsey Street. • Fall leaf pickup went well with residents using the required compostable bags. • Placed Christmas decorations on TH25, Broadway and Walnut Street. • Stormwater repairs on Gillard Avenue. • Street light repairs on Broadway, TH 25 and School Boulevard. Snow Plow Report: • Average temp for November is 26 degrees Council Connection -11/26/18 • Snow fall totaled 3 inches • Plow crews were dispatched twice. UTILITIES DEPARTMENT The Utilities Department's primary goals are to provide for safe, reliable, and clean drinking water and to provide safe and efficient collection of wastewater without impacting the environment. Here are a few of the key items that have been happening within the Utilities Department: • Water and sewer • Finished up with our fall flushing • We are working on our storm sewer televising • Well maintenance • Sewer main root cutting • Reading meters and service requests.