City Council Minutes 10-06-1980MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL
October 6, 1980 - 7:30 P.M.
Members Present: Arve Grimsmo, Dan Blonigen, Fran Fair, Ken Maus, Phil White.
Members Absent: None
1. Continuation of Public Hearing on Consideration of a Variance for the
St. Michael and All the Angels Episcopal Church, and the Possible
Adoption of Guidelines for Directional Signs.
A variance was previously requested by the St. Michaels & All the Angels
Episcopal Church at the last Council meeting to allow an off -premise
directional sign somewhere in the area of Palm St. & East Broadway, and
also in the area of 4th St. & Highway 25. The Council, at the last
meeting, deferred any action on this particular item until more informa-
tion could be gathered on a standard type of sign that could possibly be
used.
A recommendation was made to the Council Members by Loren Klein, Building
Inspector, John Simola, Public Works Director, and Gary Wieber, City
Administrator, indicating that such directional signs should be uniform
in size, height and color, and should be limited to advertising such
facilities as medical facilities, governmental facilities, churches
and other civic interest groups. In addition, it was recommended that
each sign be purchased by the City and installed with the organization
paying the cost of the sign plus $25.00 as a permit. It was recommended
by this Committee that directional signs of this nature be handled on a
variance basis, rather than changing the existing City Ordinances to allow
all types of businesses to use directional signs.
Motion was made by Ken Maus, seconded by Phil White and unanimously carried
to adopt a set of guidelines for directional type sign variances as
follows:
A. SIZE - To be 18" x 24".
B. HEIGHT - To be no greater than a stop sign.
C. COLOR & MATERIAL - Signs for Hospitals and Churches should be Blue &
White; Parks & Recreation should be Brown & White; General Information
should be Green & White.
D. NUMBER OF SIGNS - One per establishment.
E. CONTENT - Directions Only.
F. TYPES OF SIGNS - For Medical Facilities, Governmental Facilities,
Churches & Other Civic Interest Groups Only.
G. PERMIT FEE - Establishment to pay cost of sign plus $25.00 permit.
- 1 -
Council Minutes - 10/6/80
Motion also included a variance to the St. Michael & All The Angels
Episcopal Church to erect one directional sign per the guidelines, which
would be reviewed after five years.
2. Public Hearing on the Consideration of a Variance Request to Eliminate
Continuous Curb Barrier Around the Perimeter of a Parking Lot - United
Methodist Church.
The United Methodist Church requested a variance to have a parking lot
completed to the south of their Church without the necessary curb barrier
requirement around the perimeter of their parking lot.
This parking lot was proposed in conjunction with Wrightco Products, who
would utilize the parking lot during weekdays, while the United Methodist
Church would use the parking lot on Sundays and for other services.
The obligation of Wrightco Products would be to pay for the completion
of the parking lot and continued maintenance even though it would be
situated on the Church property.
The Church's request for elimination of the curb barrier was based on
the fact that drainage would appear to pond behind the School and Church
building if a curb was installed and would not be able to flow out into
the street.
A motion was made by Fran Fair, seconded by Dan Blonigen and unanimously
carried to approve the variance request for the United Methodist Church
to eliminate the curb barrier around the perimeter of their new parking
lot.
3. Report by Engineer on Storm Water Ponding Problems - West River Street.
Mr. Ron Nygaard, who lives at 1521 West River Street in Ritze Manor Addi-
tion, approached the City Council at the August 25, 1980 Council Meeting
indicating a concern for a problem with drainage in this area along
West River Street.
At the last Council Meeting, September 8, 1980, John Badalich, City
Engineer, recommended that culverts for Lots 2 & 3, Block 1, Ritze Manor
be increased to 18" diameter, and Lots 4 & 5, Block 1, Ritze Manor, be
increased to 24", and also a 24" culvert be placed on Hilltop Drive to
allow the drainage to run off into a creek without causing any backup
problems.
The engineer's estimate for changing these culverts and restoring the
driveways was estimated at approximately $6,250.
After reviewing the estimated cost, the Council discussed whether any
portion of the project would be assessed to the benefitted property
owners or whether the City would pick up the entire cost on ad valorem
taxes. Although there was concern that picking up the entire cost
may set a precedent in the future, a majority of the Council members felt
- 2 -
Council Minutes - 10/6/80
that the City had a certain responsibility in this instance in that they
did allow the smaller culverts to be installed just recently, since this
area has been developed with homes in the past five or six years.
In regards to Council discussion on whether other areas within the City
may also have similar problems, Public Works Director, John Simola, noted
to the Council that another property owner at the intersection of River
Street and Otter Creek Road has a similar problem in that the culvert is
undersized and the drainage has, on a number of occasions, flowed over
his driveway. It was noted that other than this particular property
and the area discussed by the engineer in Ritze Manor, no other areas or
problems have been brought to the attention of the City.
Motion was therefore made by Phil White, seconded by Fran Fair to
order the improvement project to install the necessary culverts as needed
to eliminate the drainage problems along West River Street with the
entire cost of the improvement to be picked up by the City. Voting in
favor: Phil White, Fran Fair, Arve Grimsmo, Ken Maus. Opposed: Dan Blonigen.
It was noted that quotes will be obtained for this improvement project by
the City Engineer and brought to the Council for their approval.
4. Consideration of Approval of Preliminary Subdivision Plat - Riverwood Estates.
Mr. Floyd Kruse and Kermit Lindberg requested approval of a preliminary
subdivision plat consisting of 13 residential lots ranging in size from
12,100 square feet to 23,000 square feet, and 5 commercial lots ranging
in size from 12,600 square feet to 72,500 square feet.
The proposed plat, as presented, calls for the extension of Mississippi
Drive westerly to the property line of the Wastewater Treatment Plant
property. This street would be deadended at the property line, and the
Council discussed whether this street actually should be a cul-de-sac
for maintenance purposes vs. a deadend residential street. Although the
street would not be used for through traffic, it was noted by Public Works
Director, John Simola, that this deadend street could be used as an
alternate route to the Treatment Plant if necessary, and would be utilized
very little by the City.
It was noted that before the final plat could be presented to the Council,
rezoning of lots 5, 6, 7 & 8 of Block 1 had been requested to be rezoned
from B-3 to R-1 residential, and also rezoning of Lot 1, Block 2 from
R-1 to B-3 (commercial). These rezoning issues will be reviewed by the
Planning Commission on October 14th, prior to the final submission of
the final plat to the Council. In addition, it was noted by the City
Engineer that a grading plan had not yet been submitted for review and
recommended that any approval be contingent upon submission of this
final grading plan.
Motion was made by Phil White, seconded by Ken Maus and unanimously carried
to approve the preliminary plat, contingent upon submission of a grading
plan and approval by City Engineer, and also reviewing the details on how
the Mississippi Drive extension be constructed, whether a deadend street or
cul-de-sac be shown on the plat.
- 3 -
5.
Council Minutes - 10/6/80
Consideration of Allocation of Chemical Feed Equipment and Chemical Costs.
As part of the requirements of the City of Monticello's NPDES (National
Pollutant Discharge Emission System Permit) Issued by the PCA, chemical
feed equipment system was authorized by the City to reduce its pollutant
discharge into the Mississippi River to meet the standards set by the
State. At the time this system was authorized, it was determined that
Wrightco Products should be allocated their proportionate share since they
were the primary factor in the necessity of the City of Monticello having
to install this equipment.
In regards to the allocation of chemical feed equipment installation costs,
operating costs including chemicals, and the additional engineering fees
related to the chemical feed equipment, a report was prepared by the City
Engineer, John Badalich, in regards to his recommendations on a possible
allocation of costs. The report noted that Wrightco Products and the
City of Monticello had done sampling tests of the effluent emitted by
Wrightco Products.
Prior to the Council Meeting, a meeting had been held with Wrightco
Products President, Jim Ridgeway, City Engineer, John Badalich, City
Administrator and Public Works Director, and an agreement had been made
whereby the startup costs for the installation of the Chemical Feed
Equipment would result in a 45% share being paid by Wrightco Products
based on an average of all samples taken.
The equipment costs along with installation, chemicals for start up,
and development, and laboratory tests during the start-up, totalled
$23,071.42, plus indirect engineering costs of $9,514. Total is
$32,585.42. Of this amount, 45% would be allocated to Wrightco Products,
or $14,663. In addition to the actual chemical feed equipment costs,
etc., it was determined in the meeting with Wrightco Products that
approximately $16,939 for chemicals and operating costs have been incurred
by the City since the actual installation, and based on the sampling tests
average, 41% of this cost would be shared by Wrightco Products, or $6,945,
less a credit of $2,458 estimated salvage value on the equipment. This
salvage value credit of $2,458 was determined by taking the total salvage
value times Wrightco's share of 45%.
The total amount to be recommended by the Committee and agreed to by
Wrightco Products for the Chemical Feed Equipment totals $19,150, and
Wrightco Products requested that this amount be payable in five (5) install-
ments starting January 3, 1981, and ending on January 3, 1985. In addition,
Wrightco Products requested that the first two installments due on January 3,
1981 and January 3, 1982 bear no interest with the remaining three payments
payable with 8% interest.
In addition to the $19,150 cost, it is estimated that approximately $20,000
per year will be spent on chemicals and operating costs for the next year and
a half, until such time as the upgrading of the Wastewater Treatment Plant
is completed. Of this $20,000 annual cost, 41%, or $8,200 per year, would
also be charged to Wrightco Products as their proportionate share of the
chemicals used. This estimated $8,200 yearly cost would be adjusted according
to sampling done based on Wrightco's effluent, or BOD levels.
- 4 -
Council Minutes - 10/6/80
Discussion by the Council concerned whether the City should charge 8%
annual interest on the entire $19,150 payable in five installments,
or whether the first two years could be interest free.
Motion was made by Fran Fair, seconded by Phil White to approve the
allocation of the initial start-up costs and annual operating costs
as negotiated and agreed upon by Wrightco Products and the City, totalling
$19,150 payable in five annual installments with no interest the first
two installments, plus 41% of the estimated annual operating costs, subject
to this agreement being approved by the City Attorney. Voting in favor:
Arve Grimsmo, Phil White, Fran Fair. Opposed: Ken Maus, Dan Blonigen.
6. Consideration of the Adoption of a Resolution Calling for a Referendum on
the Issuance of General Obligation Bonds to Finance the Construction of
a Public Library.
Merrill Birch, Architect on the Library project, informed the Council
that the estimated cost for the proposed library would be approximately
$500,000 including land costs and architectural fees. The Committee for
the Library Project recommended that approximately $250,000 be borrowed
with the issuance of General Obligation Bonds, with the remaining $250,000
coming from the sale of the Oakwood Building Block.
The Library Project Committee also recommended that the City Council expend
approximately $500 authorizing the Architect to prepare a model of the
proposed library for informational meetings prior to the November 4th
General Election. This model would be useful for presentations to inform
the public of the proposed library.
Motion was made by Phil White, seconded by Fran Fair and unanimously
carried to adopt a resolution placing the issuance of general obligation
bonds on the November 4, 1980 ballot in the amount of $250,000 for the
purpose of building a new public library, and also to authorize up to
$600 expenditure for a scale model of the proposed library.
(See Resolution 1980 #26)
7. Consideration of Approval of Agreement with the Minnesota Department of
Transportation, and Approval of Plans and Specifications for a Commuter
Parking Lot Southwest ^of the I-94 Interchange.
The Minnesota Department of Transportation has submitted a proposed
agreement whereby the City of Monticello will be offered $6,000 to
develop a 152 -space commuter parking lot. This allocation is based
primarily on a gravel -based commuter parking lot proposed at the Inter-
change of I-94, southwest of Highway 25.
- 5 -
Council Minutes - 10/6/80
The total cost of constructing a commuter parking lot with blacktop, etc.
for approximately 220 spaces was previously estimated at $54,000 by the
consulting engineer, John Badalich. It was recommended by the engineer
that the entire commuter parking lot area be graded for expansion up to
220 spaces, but only Class 5 be installed on approximately half of it,
or 110 spaces. The estimated cost for this portion of the project would
be between $6,000 - 8,000, which would be primarily covered by the
$6,000 grant from the Minnesota Department of Transportation.
It was pointed out that the City does not actually have title to the
property as of this date, and it was the consensus of the Council that
any improvements being done to the commuter parking lot this fall should
not exceed the $6,000 grant until we get title to the property. Once the
City is the actual owner of the property, blacktopping, etc., could be
installed next spring, if desired.
In regards to the drainage that would be created by the parking lot,
consulting engineer, John Badalich, indicated that the State had agreed
to the drainage plan whereby any water would drain through the I-94 ditch.
Motion was made by Ken Maus, seconded by Fran Fair and unanimously carried
to approve the agreement with the Minnesota Department of Transportation
on the commuter parking lot and accepting the $6,000 grant, and approval
of plans and specifications for the development of a commuter parking lot
consisting of 110 spaces with Class 5, and the entire area being brought
up to grade, with a note that blacktopping would be considered next year
when title is received from the State and County.
8. Department Head Quarterly Meeting.
The following Department Heads were in attendance at the Council Meeting:
Fire Chief - Paul Klein
Wright County Sheriff's Rep. - Buddy Gay
Senior Citizens Director - Karen Hanson
YMCA Detached Worker - Mike Melstad
Public Works Director - John Simola
Building Inspector/Civil Defense Dir. - Loren Klein
City Administrator - Gary Wieber
Karen Hanson, Senior Citizens Center Director, noted that she was in
agreement with the Council's recent decision to deny appropriating $1,000
to the Sherburne County Social Services Department to help in the
transportation cost of Senior Citizens attending the Big Lake Nutrition
Center twice weekly. Her own survey indicates that only two individuals
currently use the bus services to Big Lake regularly, and felt that the
$1,000 would be hard to justify for these two individuals.
- 6 -
Council Minutes - 10/6/80
Public Works Director, John Simola, requested that Dick Schillewaert be
paid approximately $3,000 for the sod he recently installed as partof
the 1979-1 Improvement Project in Oakwood Industrial Park. His request
was based on the fact that the price from Schillewaert was very favor-
able, and recommended that his bill be paid as soon as possible since
Mr. Schillewaert had to pay for the sod from his supplier as it was
delivered. Motion was made by Ken Maus, seconded by Dan Blonigen
and unanimously carried to approve the payment to Dick Schillewaert in
the amount of $2,954.50 for 3,110 square yards of sod installed as
part of the 1979-1 Improvement Project to be assessed to Oakwood Industrial
Park property.
Mr. Simola also recommended that the City Council require property owners
on the north side of Broadway between Cedar and New Streets to shovel
their sidewalks during the winter months, as many of the pedestrian's are
walking in the street, creating a safety problem. It was noted by the
Council that although City Ordinances require downtown businesses to keep
their sidewalks clear of snow, this provision of the Ordinance has not
really been enforced in residential areas in the past.
9. Consideration of Additional Billings from Consulting Engineer on Chemical
Feed Equipment Installation and Wastewater Treatment Plant Analysis
and Reports.
Consulting Engineer, John Badalich, reviewed with the Council all of the
costs his firm has incurred since June 1977 in regards to the City of
Monticello's Wastewater Treatment Plant effluent quality analysis and
recommendations for interim chemical treatment.
Mr. Badalich indicated that over the past three years, many hours went
into report writing, meetings, and correspondence with the PCA in regards
to the reissuance of the City's NPDES Permit. The ultimate solution to
the reissuance of the City's NPDES Permit to dump effluent into the
Mississippi River was culminated by the fact that the City had to install
the chemical feed equipment to reduce effluent levels discharged.
Mr. Badalich indicated that because many additional tests were done by
his firm because of Wrightco Products disagreement with the amount they
were contributing and also the decision by the City not to install the
chemical feed equipment in the fall of 1977, additional costs were
incurred by his firm, which he felt should be billable to the City of
Monticello. He indicated that numerous correspondence took place with
the PCA in an effort to avoid requiring the City to install this equipment,
but samplings done at the plant eventually lead to the requirement that
the chemical feed equipment be installed.
In addition to the additional engineering expenses in regards to the City's
effluent problem and the Permit reissuance, Mr. Badalich indicated that
the initial cost for the design and preparation of plans and specifications
t for the chemical feed equipment amounted to over $8,000. Mr. Badalich also
felt an additional $8,000 approximately was incurred in other engineering
related matters to the Wastewater Treatment Plant and submitted a total
bill in excess of $16,000.
- 7 -
Council Minutes - 10/6/80
Although the Council did not question whether the bills were legitimate
or not, concerns were expressed over the time delay in presenting the bills
to actually when they were incurred. However, in an effort to resolve
the issue, motion was made by Phil White, seconded by Fran Fair to compromise
on the engineering fees, and authorize an $8,000 payment in full for services
rendered. Voting in favor: Phil White, Fran Fair, Arve Grimsmo, Ken Maus,
with Dan Blonigen abstaining.
Meeting adjourned.
Rick Wolfsteller,
Assistant Administrator
RW/ns