Loading...
City Council Agenda Packet 05-28-2019AGENDA REGULAR MEETING — MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, May 28, 2019 — 6:30 p.m. Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING Academy Room 5:00 p.m. 5:00 p.m. 2018 Audit Review 5:30 p.m. Xcel Energy IRP Preferred Plan Nuclear Energy Institute Initiative — Spent Fuel Transport Coalition of Utility Cities 2019 Study 6:00 p.m. Review Fire Station Budget Items Mayor: Brian Stumpf Council Members: Jim Davidson, Bill Fair, Charlotte Gabler, Lloyd Hilgart General Business A. Call to Order & Pledge of Allegiance B. Approval of Agenda — Councilmembers or the City Administrator may add items to the agenda for discussion purposes or approval. The City Council may or may not take official action on items added to the agenda. C. Approval of Meeting Minutes • Regular Meeting Minutes from May 13, 2019 D. Citizen Comments — Individuals may address the City Council about any item not contained on the agenda. Each speaker will be allotted three minutes with a maximum of five speakers. The Mayor may allow for additional time and/or speakers. The City Council generally takes no official action of items discussed, with the exception of referral to staff for future report. E. Public Service Announcements/Updates • Recognition of Planning Commission Chairman Brad Fyle • Walk `n' Roll F. Council Liaison Updates • Parks & Recreation Commission G. Department Updates • City Administrator Update • Construction Update • Public Works/Engineering Update 2. Consent Agenda — All items listed on the Consent Agenda are considered standard or may not need discussion prior to approval. These items are acted upon by one motion unless a councilmember, the city administrator, or a citizen requests the item by removed from consent for additional discussion. A. Consideration of approving payment of bills B. Consideration of approving new hires and departures for City departments C. Consideration of approving the sale/disposal of surplus city property D. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2019-37 accepting a donation of $500 from CentraCare Health Monticello for Music on the Mississippi E. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2019-38 accepting donations of $4,670 for the Walk `n' Roll event F. Consideration of approving a Special Event Permit allowing exclusive use of West Bridge Park and related assistance in conjunction with the Brewfest event on August 17, 2019. Applicant: Monticello Lions Club G. Consideration of approving an application for temporary on -sale liquor license for the Monticello Lions Club for their Brewfest event on August 17, 2019 H. Consideration of approving a Special Event Permit for Church of St. Henry's Fun Fest being held on August 24-25, 2019 I. Consideration of approving applications for a 2 -day temporary liquor license and a charitable gambling permit for Church of St. Henry's festival on August 24-25, 2019 J. Consideration of authorizing city staff to work with Wright County to establish a second election precinct K. Consideration of authorizing Classification and Compensation Study and awarding contract to Keystone Compensation Group L. Consideration of approving Ordinance 721 and Summary Ordinance 721A for publication for amendments to the Monticello Zoning Ordinance as related to Self -Storage uses, and Ordinance 722, an amendment to the Spaeth Industrial Park Planned Unit Development District, and development contract for the Spaeth Industrial Park Planned Unit Development. Applicant: Ken Spaeth M. Consideration to acknowledge receipt of petition for annexation from Ronald Denn, General Partner, Denn Family Properties, LP and Ronald and Lisa Denn and to proceed to verification of compliance with the Joint Resolution for Orderly Annexation N. Consideration of approving the purchase of a 2019 Kawasaki Mule 4 X 4 from Osseo Powersports for $18,431 O. Consideration of approving an easement agreement with Speedway in the amount of $1,928 for the 2018 Pedestrian Improvement Project, City Project 18C001 P. Consideration of approving pathway micro -surfacing improvement project and awarding contract to MP Asphalt Maintenance in the amount of $22,576 Q. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2019-39 authorizing the conveyance of city property located at 707 West Broadway and dispensing with statutory requirements for review by the Planning Commission and approving a contract for private development with Charles Maue R. Consideration of authorizing USAquatics to provide aquatic consulting, engineering, and design services associated with the replacement of the existing flume waterslide at the Monticello Community Center for $13,068 S. Consideration of approving purchase of epoxy floor for the new fire station apparatus bay from SwedeBro in the amount of $77,950 T. Consideration of approving purchase of security system for the new fire station from Russell Security in the amount of $42,153 U. Consideration of approving purchase of audio-visual package for the new fire station from Tierney Brothers in the amount of $99,200 2A. Consideration of items removed from the consent agenda for discussion 3. Public Hearings 4. Regular Agenda A. Consideration of accepting the 2018 Audit Report B. Consideration of a request for amendment to PUD and Development Staae PUD, and preliminary plat for the development of Spirit Hills South, a 48 unit single family residential in an R -A (Residential Amenities) District. A_mlicant: R.W. Land Holdings, LLC C. Consideration of authorizing members of the City Council to participate in the I- 94 Coalition lobbvina effort July 24-25, 2019 in Washington D.C. at an estimated cost of $1,000 per participant 5. Added Items 6. Adjournment AGENDA CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, May 28, 2019 — 5:00 p.m. Academy Room, MCC AGENDA 1. Call to Order 2. 5:00 p.m. 2018 Audit Review 3. 5:30 p.m. Xcel Energy IRP Preferred Plan Nuclear Energy Institute Initiative — Spent Fuel Transport Coalition of Utility Cities 2019 Study 4. 6:00 p.m. Review Fire Station Budget Items 5. Adjournment REGULAR MEETING — MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, May 13, 2019 — 6:30 p.m. Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center Present: Mayor Brian Stumpf, Jim Davidson, Bill Fair, Charlotte Gabler, and Lloyd Hilgart Absent: None 1. General Business A. Call to Order & Pledge of AlleLiance Mayor Stumpf called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. B. Approval of Auenda Councilmember Gabler moved approval of the agenda with the additional discussion regarding the Riverfest float. Councilmember Davidson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. C. Approval of Minutes Special Meeting Minutes from A )ril 22, 2019 Councilmember Fair moved approval of the special meeting minutes with an amendment to note that he was absent. Councilmember Gabler seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Regular Meeting Minutes from April 22, 2019 Councilmember Fair moved approval of the regular meeting minutes. Councilmember Gabler seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. D. Citizen Comments • Wright County Sheriff Deringer addressed the City Council and opened up for any questions. • Troy Nygaard, NW Area Jaycees, was present to talk about their gambling premises permit. They currently have gambling at Applebee's and are adding the Country Club. They are donating their funds to pay off school lunch debt. They presented a donation of $2,000 to Little Mountain Elementary and hope to pay off the remaining debt by next year. E. Public Service Announcements • Memorial Day Hours — City Hall, MCC, DMV and Public Works will be closed. Hi -Way Liquors will be open 9 a.m. — 6 p.m. F. Council Liaison Updates • BCOL — Councilmember Fair updated on the meeting in May. There was a presentation on what the park will look like in Phase I build out. Wright County provided an update on the RV Park with a goal to break ground in 2020. City Council Minutes — May 13, 2019 Page 1 1 5 • IEDC — Mayor Stumpf provided a recap of the May 7 meeting. The commission reviewed a rezoning related to self -storage, updated on two BR & E visits/schedule, and reviewed the prospect list. • Planning Commission — Councilmember Davison gave an update on the Planning Commission meeting. The meeting included amendment to PUD regarding self -storage, Spirit Hills South PUD preliminary plat, and miscellaneous ordinance amendments. • EDA - Councilmember Davidson stated that the EDA discussed accepting quotes for soil borings of the Block 52 site and reviewed the I-94 expansion project and the need for land for setup operations (this was tabled). G. Department Updates • City Administrator Update - Jeff O'Neill provided an update on the following items: 1. There is a meeting at Monticello Township on May 20. Staff will be present to discuss Comprehensive Plan participation details and the south East Area Study. 2. Xcel Energy Preferred Plan and Preliminary Modeling results will be provided at Xcel Energy on May 20. 3. The quarterly meeting with the school district is Friday, May 24 at 8 a.m. 4. The sales tax reimbursement request for the new fire station is in the Omnibus Tax bill. 5. Thanked all that participated in the fire station groundbreaking on Friday, May 10. 6. Councilmember Hilgart will also serve on the Public Works Facility Committee. • Wright County Sheriffs Office Quarterly Update — Lt. Eric Kunkel presented the Wright County Sheriff Office quarterly update which was included in the agenda packet. • Fibernet (Arvig) Quarterly Report — Mark Birkholz, Arvig, provided the FiberNet quarterly update which was included in the agenda packet. 2. Consent A e� nda: Councilmember Fair moved approval of the Consent Agenda. Councilmember Hilgart seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. A. Consideration of approving the payment of bills. Recommendation: Approved the bill and purchase card registers for a total amount of $1,048,846.59. B. Consideration of approving new hires/departures. Recommendation: Approved the hires for MCC, Streets, and Parks and terminations for MCC and liquor store. C. Consideration of approving the sale/disposal of surplus city property. Recommendation: Approved as presented. City Council Minutes — May 13, 2019 Page 2 1 5 D. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2019-30 accepting donations of $500 from Galindo Real Estate Group for Music on the Mississippi, $600 from Community United Methodist Church for Movies in the Park, $250 from Healing Moments Counseling for Farmers Market Power of Produce Kids Club, $434 from various donors for art show contributions, and $878.71 donation of plants from Dan and Jerry Greenhouse. Recommendation: Adopted Resolution 2019-30 accepting the donations. E. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2019-32 accepting a grant from the Central NIN Arts Board of $5,600 for Music on the Mississippi and $2,800 for a mural. Recommendation: Adopted Resolution 2019-32 accepting the grant. F. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2019-33 accepting a $2,000 contribution from Prairie Vodka (Phillips Distilling) as co-sponsor of Twins Event during Riverfest. Recommendation: Adopted Resolution 2019-33 accepting the donation. G. Consideration of approving Special Event Permit allowing use of Ellison Park, West Bridge Park, Pioneer Park, core city public right of way, Community Center Parking Lot and related assistance in conjunction with the annual Riverfest celebration on July 11-14, 2019. Applicant: Riverfest Committee. Recommendation: Approved the event permit allowing use of Ellison Park, West Bridge Park, Pioneer Park, Community Center Parking Lot, city right of way and related city staff assistance in conjunction with the annual Riverfest celebration on July 11-14, 2019. Approval is contingent on continued site plan and traffic control coordination with Public Works and the Wright County Sheriffs Office, lot closure signage and notification in coordination with the Street Superintendent as needed. H. Consideration of approving applications for temporary on -sale liquor licenses for the Monticello Lions Club for Riverfest Community Celebration events on July 13 and 14, 2019. Recommendation: Approved the application for three temporary on -sale liquor licenses for the Monticello Lions Club for Riverfest Community Celebration events on July 13 and 14, 2019. I. Consideration of waiving monetary limits on municipal tort liability established by Minnesota Statutes. Recommendation: Denied waiving the monetary limits on municipal tort liability established by Minnesota Statutes. J. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2019-34 approving an application for a Gambling Premises Permit to conduct gambling at the Monticello Country Club, 1209 Golf Course Road, Monticello. Applicant: Northwest Area Jaycees. Recommendation: Adopted Resolution 2019-34 approving an application for a Gambling Premises Permit at Monticello Country Club, located at 1209 Golf Course Road, for the Northwest Area Jaycees. K. Consideration of authorizing Bolton and Menk, Inc. to provide engineering services at a not to exceed price of $25,900 for a needs assessment of the city's SCADA system for the water and sewer utilities. Recommendation: Authorized Bolton and Menk, Inc. to provide engineering services at a not to exceed City Council Minutes — May 13, 2019 Page 3 1 5 price of $25,900 to perform a needs assessment of the city's SCADA system for the water and sewer utilities. L. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2019-35 accepting bids and awarding contract to Molitor Excavating Inc. for the 2019 Walnut Street Improvement Project for the base bid amount of $284, 853. Recommendation: Adopted Resolution 2019-35 accepting bids and awarding contract to Molitor Excavating Inc. for the 2019 Walnut Street Improvements project for the base bid amount of $284,853. M. Consideration of adopting Cooperative Agreement No. 19-54 between Wright County and the City of Monticello for jurisdictional change of Fenning Avenue NE. Recommendation: Adopted Cooperative Agreement No. 19-54 between Wright County and the City of Monticello for jurisdictional change on Fenning Avenue NE. N. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2019-36 accepting bids and awarding contract to Astech Corp. for the 2019 Sealcoat and Fog Seal Project in the amount of $108,084. Recommendation: Adopted Resolution 2019-36 accepting bids and awarding contract to Astech Corp. for the 2019 Sealcoat and Fog Seal project in the amount of $108,084. O. Consideration of authorizing the purchase of a pump for the Wastewater Treatment Plant from W.W. Goetsch in the amount of $29,488. Recommendation: Approved the purchase of a pump for the Waste Water Treatment Plan from W.W. Goetsch in the amount of $29,488 plus freight. P. Consideration of authorizing the purchase of a pedestrian bridge from Wheeler Lumber LLC for the sum of $12,200. Recommendation: Approved the purchase of a pedestrian bridge from Wheeler Lumber LLC for the sum of $12,200. Q. Consideration of adopting Ordinance 720 for amendment to Monticello Zoning Ordinance Chapter 2, Section 4 Specific Review Procedures & Requirements, Chapter 3, Section 4 Residential Base Zoning Districts, Chapter 4, Section 10 Grading, Drainage, Stormwater Management & Erosion Control, Chapter 5, Section 1 Use Table, Chapter 5, Section 2 Use -Specific Standards, Chapter 5, Section 3 Accessory Use Standards, and Chapter 8, Section 4 Definitions and Summary Ordinance 720A for publication. Applicant: City of Monticello. Recommendation: Adopted Ordinance 720 amending the Monticello Zoning Ordinance, various chapter and sections, based on findings as stated in the Planning Commission Resolution No. PC -2019-013 and Summary Ordinance 720A for publication. R. Consideration of approving a $14,711 increase to the Vehicle Exhaust Capture System contract with TNC Inc. for total of $52,683. Recommendation: Approved a $14,711 increase to the Vehicle Exhaust Capture System contract with TNC Inc. for total of $52,683. S. Consideration of authorizing preparation of purchase agreement awarding sale of property located at 707 West Broadway (Ellison House) to Charles A. Maue. City Council Minutes — May 13, 2019 Page 4 15 Recommendation: Awarded sale of Ellison House to Charles A. Maue and authorizing preparation of a purchase agreement accordingly. T. Consideration of authorizing WSB & Associates to provide professional concept planning services associated with the old skate/wheel park site at the Monticello Community Center at a not to exceed price of $7,450. Recommendation: Accepted quotes and awarded contract to WSB & Associates in the amount of $7,450 for professional concept planning services by the lowest bidder as highlighted in yellow and identified in the previous table. 3. Public Hearings: None. 4. Regular Aeenda: A. Consideration of authorizing staff to enter into final sgone and contract neizotiations with the Lakota Group/WSB for the Monticello 2040 Community_ Vision & Comprehensive Plan. Angela Schumann, Community Development Director, provided and overview and noted that four proposals were submitted for consideration. All four firms were interviewed by the Planning Commission, City Council and Proposal Review Subcommittee. Following the interviews, the attendees recommended the Lakota Group/WSB. The recommendation was based on project approach, team experience, community engagement strategy, project component scope, and budget. Councilmember Gabler moved approval of entering into final scope and contract negotiations with The Lakota Group/WSB for the Monticello 2040 Community Vision & Comprehensive Plan. Councilmember Davidson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. 5. Added Items: Councilmember Gabler requested that the Council discuss participation on a float for the Riverfest festival. There was consensus that any councilmember can ride on the city float if interested. 5. Adiournment: By consensus, the meeting was adjourned at Recorder: Jennifer Schreiber Approved: Attest: City Administrator City Council Minutes — May 13, 2019 Page 5 1 5 City Council Agenda: 05/28/2019 2A. Consideration of avvrovin2 pavment of bills (WO) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: City staff submits the attached bill registers and purchasing card registers for approval by Council. The bill registers contain all invoices processed and the purchasing card registers contain all card purchases made since the last Council meeting. Subject to MN Statutes, most invoices require Council approval prior to releasing checks for payment. The day following Council approval, payments will be released unless directed otherwise. A credit purchasing agreement and policy was approved by Council initially and card purchases must comply with the policy. If Council has no questions or comments on the bill and purchase card registers, these can be approved with the consent agenda. If requested, this item can be removed from consent and discussed prior to making a motion for approval. Al. Budget Impact: None A2. Staff Workload Impact: No additional work required. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the bill and purchase card registers for a total amount of $553,542.87. 2. Motion to approve the registers with changes directed by Council. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends Alternative #1 or #2, per direction of Council. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • Bill registers and Purchase Card registers Accounts Payable Computer Check Proof List by Vendor User: Debbie.Davidson T Printed: 05/15/2019 - 4:OOPM Batch: 00201.05.2019 - 201.05.2019 US Bank Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Vendor: 4263 CAYAN Check Sequence: 1 1008886 April 2019 (3) Genius Service Fee - CC machine 89.85 05/15/2019 609-49754-424100 1008886 (13,988) April 2019 Transactions 979.16 05/15/2019 609-49754-443980 Check Total: 1,069.01 Vendor: 3241 LINCOLN FINANCIAL GROUP Check Sequence: 2 5/1/2019 May 2019 2,565.75 05/15/2019 101-00000-217066 Check Total: 2,565.75 Vendor: 1593 MN DEPT OF REVENUE - ACH Check Sequence: 3 April April Sales Tax - Hi Way Liquor 47,589.11 05/15/2019 609-00000-208100 April April Sales Tax - Hi Way Liquor 0.89 05/15/2019 609-49750-443990 April April Sales Tax - General 42.31 05/15/2019 101-00000-208100 April April Sales Tax - General -0.31 05/15/2019 101-00000-362900 April April Waste Tax - General 66.30 05/15/2019 101-00000-208120 April April Waste Tax - General -0.30 05/15/2019 101-00000-362900 April April Sales Tax - MCC 6,957.48 05/15/2019 226-00000-208100 April April Sales Tax - MCC -0.48 05/15/2019 226-45122-362900 April April Sales Tax - Water 868.78 05/15/2019 601-00000-208100 April April Sales Tax - Water 0.22 05/15/2019 601-49440-443990 April April Sales Tax - Cemetary 20.61 05/15/2019 651-00000-208100 April April Sales Tax - Cemetary 0.39 05/15/2019 651-49010-443990 Check Total: 55,545.00 Vendor: 1426 CITY OF MONTICELLO Check Sequence: 4 UB Mar 2019 5026- Ellison Park 14.78 05/15/2019 101-45201-438200 UB Mar 2019 5250- Bridge Park W 18.56 05/15/2019 101-45201-438200 UB Mar 2019 5637- Meadow Oak Dog Park 5.60 05/15/2019 101-45201-438200 UB Mar 2019 7224 - WWTP 1,808.16 05/15/2019 602-49480-438200 UB Mar 2019 7256-003 - 349 Broadway W- Arts Bldg. 14.78 05/15/2019 101-45204-438200 UB Mar 2019 7256-007 - 103 Pine St 14.78 05/15/2019 213-46301-438200 Moiiii6effo Y Reference ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: True AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/15/2019 - 4:00 PM) Page 1 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number UB Mar 2019 7885 - Help Center 18.56 05/15/2019 217-41990-438200 UB Mar 2019 8086 - 4th St. Warming House 14.78 05/15/2019 101-45201-438200 UB Mar 2019 8114 - Hi -Way Liquor 48.15 05/15/2019 609-49754-438200 UB Mar 2019 8117 - MCC 1,160.71 05/15/2019 226-45126-438200 UB Mar 2019 8119 - Fire Station 24.25 05/15/2019 101-42200-438200 UB Mar 2019 8120 - Bldg. Inspection Garage 14.78 05/15/2019 101-41940-438200 UB Mar 2019 8177 - Library 199.48 05/15/2019 101-45501-438200 UB Mar 2019 8528 - Monti NSPSoftball Field 14.78 05/15/2019 101-45203-438200 UB Mar 2019 8622 - Pioneer Pk bathroom 14.78 05/15/2019 101-45201-438200 UB Mar 2019 8631 - Animal Shelter 14.78 05/15/2019 101-42700-438200 UB Mar 2019 8903 - PW Shop/Clerical 83.66 05/15/2019 101-43127-438200 UB Mar 2019 8904 - PW Vehicle Storage- inc. credit freeze pre 86.46 05/15/2019 101-43127-438200 UB Mar 2019 8905 - PW Office 14.78 05/15/2019 101-43127-438200 UB Mar 2019 10128 - 118 6th St. W Office 27.68 05/15/2019 101-41941-438200 UB Mar 2019 14476 - Ellison House 22.46 05/15/2019 101-45201-438200 Check Total: 3,636.75 Vendor: 4470 US BANK - BONDS Check Sequence: 5 1390159 Interest - GO Bonds 2013B - WWTP 28,048.75 05/15/2019 602-49480-461100 Check Total: 28,048.75 Vendor: 2811 US BANK CORPORATE PMT SYSTEM Check Sequence: 6 05/06/2019 Boyer - #110 -turbo GP; (4) stud taper; etc. 1,739.61 05/15/2019 101-43120-422110 05/06/2019 Boyer - #110 - cm bulk 1.43 05/15/2019 101-43120-422110 05/06/2019 Runnings - Lysol cleaner 2.39 05/15/2019 101-42200-421100 05/06/2019 Runnings - #107 - (4) clamps 6.36 05/15/2019 101-43120-422110 05/06/2019 AT & T FirstNet- 3/2019 (2) mobile unl. aircard 6.48 05/15/2019 101-42200-432100 05/06/2019 Runnings - cable ties- neon 6.99 05/15/2019 101-43127-421990 05/06/2019 Monti Napa - #117 - air filter 15.95 05/15/2019 101-43127-422120 05/06/2019 Runnings -2 gal. sprayer 17.99 05/15/2019 601-49440-421990 05/06/2019 Runnings -2 gal. sprayer- Shop 17.99 05/15/2019 101-43127-421990 05/06/2019 Royal Tire - flat repair 23.87 05/15/2019 101-45201-440440 05/06/2019 Cornerstone Chevy - #130- tailgate handle 24.33 05/15/2019 101-43120-422110 05/06/2019 Home Depot - black paint; (5) magnet tape 24.38 05/15/2019 101-45204-421990 05/06/2019 Office Max- deskpad; (4) 2pk clipbrd; 25.37 05/15/2019 101-45204-421990 05/06/2019 Home Depot - well #1 (3) quikrete sealant; Scot( 26.50 05/15/2019 601-49440-422300 05/06/2019 Cornerstone Chevy - moulding 35.14 05/15/2019 101-43120-422110 05/06/2019 Cub - resale - (10) lemons; (3 0) limes 36.60 05/15/2019 609-49750-425500 05/06/2019 Cub - resale - (7) lemons; (35) limes 38.08 05/15/2019 609-49750-425500 05/06/2019 Monti Napa - (3) qt. 80W90; fluid oil SL4344 38.70 05/15/2019 101-45201-422100 05/06/2019 Monti Napa - tire bead sealer; (2) tire valve 41.77 05/15/2019 101-45201-421650 Reference ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: True AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/15/2019 - 4:00 PM) Page 2 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 05/06/2019 Monti Napa - (6) qt. oil - Shop split 19.74 05/15/2019 101-43127-421300 05/06/2019 Monti Napa 4800 - (6) qt. oil; filter - DMV split 23.91 05/15/2019 217-41990-440500 05/06/2019 Home Depot -foam expansion joint; (3) quickret 44.72 05/15/2019 601-49440-422300 05/06/2019 Monti Napa - #107 - hose end fittings; weathersl 47.98 05/15/2019 101-43120-422110 05/06/2019 Monti Napa -well #5- air filter -generator 50.47 05/15/2019 601-49440-422100 05/06/2019 Cintas - mat serv. -inv. #4019361376; #4197762 126.80 05/15/2019 609-49754-431990 05/06/2019 NBP - cs. splenda; (24) pad; 36pk sharpie; (2) cs 283.95 05/15/2019 609-49754-421990 05/06/2019 Sherwin Williams - Arts Bldg. paint & supplies 67.40 05/15/2019 101-45201-421990 05/06/2019 Home Depot - (4) ea. wash brush; handle- washi 67.80 05/15/2019 101-43127-421100 05/06/2019 Home Depot - 25' ext. cord; 8' ext. cord; (4) wase 78.19 05/15/2019 609-49754-421990 05/06/2019 Nokomis - boots T.G. Parks 90.00 05/15/2019 101-45201-420650 05/06/2019 Galls - pants DK- Fire 96.94 05/15/2019 101-42200-421120 05/06/2019 Monti Napa - #555 wheel bearing & hub assemb 109.30 05/15/2019 101-42400-421990 05/06/2019 Hirshfields- (2) gal. paint; lOpk gold stripe; rolle 145.69 05/15/2019 217-41990-421990 05/06/2019 Dacotah Paper - (2) disp. vista see thru; cs. pap t 80.44 05/15/2019 101-45201-421650 05/06/2019 Dacotah Paper - (2) cs. toilet tissue 95.88 05/15/2019 101-43120-421990 05/06/2019 Arctic Glacier - resale inv. # 1956909807 183.70 05/15/2019 609-49750-425500 05/06/2019 Magid Glove & Safety- Calib. gas; (20) Safety g 98.00 05/15/2019 601-49440-420650 05/06/2019 Magid Glove & Safety- Calib. gas; (20) Safety g 98.00 05/15/2019 602-49490-420650 05/06/2019 Rogers Radiator Rpr- Booster Pump emerg. back 474.95 05/15/2019 601-49440-440440 05/06/2019 Beacon Athl. - (6) pitchers plate 479.00 05/15/2019 101-45203-421990 05/06/2019 Guardian Fleet - Tender 3- (2) new lights; (1) rec 558.82 05/15/2019 101-42200-440500 05/06/2019 Gopher Sport - (4) first base w/ anchor & plugs 580.27 05/15/2019 101-45203-421990 05/06/2019 Royal Tire - #116 - (2) mixed service LRH; mon 1,041.95 05/15/2019 101-43120-422200 05/06/2019 WHCE - Sunset Ponds Lft. Sta. 988 kWh 135.53 05/15/2019 602-49490-438100 05/06/2019 WHCE - 1645 & 1675 CR 39 39.43 05/15/2019 602-49490-438100 05/06/2019 WHCE - DMV 19.95 05/15/2019 217-41990-431900 05/06/2019 WHCE - 2171 W. River St- Parks 36.45 05/15/2019 101-45201-431900 05/06/2019 WHCE - 5980 Jason Ave NE - Water 19.95 05/15/2019 601-49440-431900 05/06/2019 WHCE - MCC 27.95 05/15/2019 226-45126-431900 05/06/2019 WHCE - 207 Chelsea Rd - Water 32.95 05/15/2019 601-49440-431900 05/06/2019 WHCE - 209 Cedar St. - Water 29.95 05/15/2019 601-49440-431900 05/06/2019 WHCE - 132 E. Broadway - Water 29.95 05/15/2019 601-49440-431900 05/06/2019 WHCE - 107 River St - Parks 19.95 05/15/2019 101-45201-431900 05/06/2019 WHCE - May 2019 - Hi -Way Liquor 21.42 05/15/2019 609-49754-431900 05/06/2019 WHCE - May 2019 - MCC 19.95 05/15/2019 226-45126-431900 05/06/2019 WHCE - May 2019 - 200 Dundas Rd - Water 29.95 05/15/2019 601-49440-431900 05/06/2019 WHCE - May 2019 - 909 Golf Crs. Rd. 19.95 05/15/2019 101-43110-431900 05/06/2019 WHCE - General Street Lighting 1,328.69 05/15/2019 101-43160-438100 05/06/2019 Runnings - valve ball- irrigation supply 15.99 05/15/2019 101-45201-421650 05/06/2019 Grainger - repair saddle for Reservoir Water Sen 120.47 05/15/2019 601-49440-422100 05/06/2019 Amazon- (2) otterbox; (3) cs coffee; 12ct. pens;) 179.34 05/15/2019 101-43110-421990 05/06/2019 FS Solutions - DOT urine - J.M.- Water 52.20 05/15/2019 601-49440-431990 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/15/2019 - 4:00 PM) Page 3 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 05/06/2019 FS Solutions - DOT urine - T.G. Parks 52.20 05/15/2019 101-45201-431990 05/06/2019 FS Solutions - DOT urine; Breath Alchohol - T.D 97.95 05/15/2019 101-43120-431990 05/06/2019 Ameripride - Mar. 2019 uniforms - Parks 127.36 05/15/2019 101-45201-441700 05/06/2019 Ameripride - Mar. 2019 uniforms - Sewer 86.20 05/15/2019 602-49490-441700 05/06/2019 Ameripride - Mar. 2019 uniforms - Water 86.20 05/15/2019 601-49440-441700 05/06/2019 Ameripride - Mar. 2019 uniforms - Streets 165.96 05/15/2019 101-43120-441700 05/06/2019 Ameripride - Mar. 2019 towels- Shop 230.00 05/15/2019 101-43127-421990 05/06/2019 Dakota Supply - Storm Water Mntc- Sewer fip & 26.29 05/15/2019 101-43130-421990 05/06/2019 Monti Napa -(11) straps- tarp 29.39 05/15/2019 101-43127-421990 05/06/2019 Sherwin Williams - gal. wood primer 40.80 05/15/2019 101-45201-421650 05/06/2019 Runnings - (2) bulk bin - case 430 1.68 05/15/2019 101-43120-422100 05/06/2019 Cub -Arts- (4) cheese & (4) crackers 23.96 05/15/2019 101-45204-421990 05/06/2019 Sherwin Williams -(2) gal. white 44.52 05/15/2019 101-45201-421650 05/06/2019 MN St. Fire Chf- dues K.L. 57.00 05/15/2019 101-42200-443300 05/06/2019 Runnings -5 tine fork; bypass compound; bypas 76.97 05/15/2019 101-45201-421650 05/06/2019 Sherwin Williams - Ballfields- (20) stripe white 228.96 05/15/2019 101-45203-421990 05/06/2019 Dyna - shop supplies- clamps; washers; screws;1 298.87 05/15/2019 101-43127-421990 05/06/2019 MN St. Fire Chf-conferenceM.M. 300.00 05/15/2019 101-42200-433100 05/06/2019 MN St. Fire Chf -conference DC; JS 600.00 05/15/2019 101-42200-433100 05/06/2019 NBP - (4) cs. thrm paper; cs. suckers; (6) coffee 490.23 05/15/2019 609-49754-421990 05/06/2019 Occupational Dev. Cntr- (50) 30 bdl. lath wood; 663.60 05/15/2019 101-45201-421650 05/06/2019 PayPal- Rest. Supply- (50) Hvy. Duty Dome Tol 4,707.36 05/15/2019 101-45201-421650 05/06/2019 Post -a -Bid- ElsenpeterAuct.- Toro Sprayer - Par 8,100.95 05/15/2019 101-45201-424100 05/06/2019 Nighthawk - May 2019 Security monitor/cellulae 49.95 05/15/2019 101-42200-431900 05/06/2019 Facebook - advertising April for Wine Sale 55.43 05/15/2019 609-49754-425550 05/06/2019 Holiday - Unleaded Fuel - 6.257 gals @ $2.779 - 17.39 05/15/2019 101-45201-421200 05/06/2019 Runnings - Misc Hardware for Romp N Stomp 14.85 05/15/2019 226-45126-422990 05/06/2019 Target - Sandwiches, Cookies, Chips - Food Spei 43.47 05/15/2019 213-46301-443990 05/06/2019 Holiday - Unleaded Fuel - 9.237 gals @ $2.839 26.22 05/15/2019 217-41990-421200 05/06/2019 Cub - Bottled Water for Comprehensive Plan Me 3.59 05/15/2019 101-41910-443990 05/06/2019 Jimmy Johns - Food for Comprehensive Plan Me 75.77 05/15/2019 101-41910-443990 05/06/2019 Cub - Chips & Cookies for Comprehensive Plan 14.98 05/15/2019 101-41910-443990 05/06/2019 Home Depot - Black DuctTape 4.47 05/15/2019 226-45126-422990 05/06/2019 Walmart - Box Fan 19.76 05/15/2019 101-41310-421990 05/06/2019 General Rental - CO2 for Cleaning Coils 61.50 05/15/2019 226-45126-422990 05/06/2019 Sams Club - resale - Snacks for Ballfield Conces 90.00 05/15/2019 226-45125-425410 05/06/2019 Home Depot - Bins (3) 26.10 05/15/2019 226-45127-421981 05/06/2019 Holiday - Unleaded Fuel - 9.390 gals @ $2.839 26.66 05/15/2019 217-41990-421200 05/06/2019 Target - Food Special City Council Meeting 34.97 05/15/2019 101-41110-443990 05/06/2019 Walmart - Safety Activity Final Drawing Prize - 100.00 05/15/2019 101-41800-421990 05/06/2019 Walmart - Snacks for Safety Training 30.58 05/15/2019 101-41800-443990 05/06/2019 Home Depot - Number Stickers for New AC Uni 1.98 05/15/2019 226-45126-422990 05/06/2019 Target - Protein Bars, Crackers for Sale @ Conc( 67.56 05/15/2019 226-45125-425410 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/15/2019 - 4:00 PM) Page 4 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 05/06/2019 Target -Cleaning Supplies for Concession Area 22.06 05/15/2019 226-45125-421990 05/06/2019 Runnings - Paint Supplies for Oakwood Conf Rc 12.28 05/15/2019 101-41940-421990 05/06/2019 Holiday - Unleaded Fuel - 10.493 gals @ $2.759 28.95 05/15/2019 217-41990-421200 05/06/2019 Home Depot - Zip Ties, Key Ring 31.44 05/15/2019 226-45122-421990 05/06/2019 Home Depot - Access Panel for Ceiling 23.80 05/15/2019 226-45126-422990 05/06/2019 Sherwin Williams - Paint for Oakwood Conf Ro( 35.96 05/15/2019 101-41940-421990 05/06/2019 PayPal - 2019 NICHA Conference Registration ( 80.00 05/15/2019 226-45122-433100 05/06/2019 Home Depot - Switch Plate Mens Room @ Libra 3.28 05/15/2019 101-45501-421990 05/06/2019 Target - Food Special City Council Meeting 24.36 05/15/2019 101-41110-443990 05/06/2019 Target - Food for EDA Meeting 35.98 05/15/2019 213-46301-443990 05/06/2019 Holiday - Unleaded Fuel - 9.365 gals @ $2.659 24.90 05/15/2019 217-41990-421200 05/06/2019 Dollar Tree - Supplies for Egg Dive Event 16.00 05/15/2019 226-45127-421990 05/06/2019 Moon Donuts - Donuts for Meeting 11.00 05/15/2019 101-42400-443990 05/06/2019 Monti Napa - Belts for PRV (2) 13.88 05/15/2019 226-45126-422990 05/06/2019 Marties Farm - Softner Salt (1 pallet) 330.75 05/15/2019 226-45126-422990 05/06/2019 Marties Farm - Diff Salt (63 bags) 40.95 05/15/2019 226-45126-422990 05/06/2019 Home Depot - Clear Acrylic Sheet - For Fire Ex 11.98 05/15/2019 226-45126-422990 05/06/2019 Holiday - Unleaded Fuel - 10.538 gals @ $2.589 27.28 05/15/2019 217-41990-421200 05/06/2019 Home Depot - F.I. - Door Frost & Application Si44.24 05/15/2019 226-45127-421981 05/06/2019 Delta Air - Airfare to Nat'l GFOA Conference L) 283.40 05/15/2019 101-41520-433100 05/06/2019 GFOA - Registration to Nat'l GFOA Conference 465.00 05/15/2019 101-41520-433100 05/06/2019 Verizon - March 11 - April 10 25.02 05/15/2019 101-43115-432100 05/06/2019 Verizon - March 4 - April 3 20.71 05/15/2019 601-49440-432100 05/06/2019 Verizon - March 4 - April 3 20.71 05/15/2019 602-49490-432100 05/06/2019 MN Pollution Control - Wastewater Individual A 5,900.00 05/15/2019 602-49480-443700 05/06/2019 ICMA - 2019 Membership Renewal (JO) 982.00 05/15/2019 101-41310-443300 05/06/2019 Franklin Graphics - Banner 75.00 05/15/2019 226-45122-431990 05/06/2019 Aquam - Waist Belt & Strap 136.19 05/15/2019 226-45124-421990 05/06/2019 Paypal - 2019 NICHA Conference Registration ( 80.00 05/15/2019 226-45122-433100 05/06/2019 Monti Chamber - April Lunch (RL) 15.00 05/15/2019 101-41310-443990 05/06/2019 Nat'l Gym Supply - Belt, Deck & Hardware for 7 472.44 05/15/2019 226-45126-422990 05/06/2019 Banners.com - Sponsor Banners for Ballfields (p 502.28 05/15/2019 226-45127-421740 05/06/2019 Randys - Monthly Shredding Service (DMV) 21.26 05/15/2019 217-41990-431990 05/06/2019 Randys - Monthly Shredding Service (CH) 21.26 05/15/2019 101-41310-431990 05/06/2019 Service Master - Cleaning Services - MCC - Apr 4,193.00 05/15/2019 226-45126-431100 05/06/2019 Service Master - Cleaning Services - City Hall - 718.00 05/15/2019 101-41940-431100 05/06/2019 Service Master - Cleaning Services - Head End - 606.38 05/15/2019 656-00000-202099 05/06/2019 Service Master - Cleaning Services - Prairie Cen 536.00 05/15/2019 101-41941-431100 05/06/2019 Service Master - Cleaning Services - Library - A 1,769.62 05/15/2019 101-45501-431100 05/06/2019 Verizon - Feb 21 - March 20 35.01 05/15/2019 101-43115-432100 05/06/2019 Verizon - Feb 21 - March 20 61.03 05/15/2019 101-43120-432100 05/06/2019 Verizon - Feb 21 - March 20 140.04 05/15/2019 101-42200-432100 05/06/2019 Amazon- Replacement 601b Dumbbells (2) 143.62 05/15/2019 226-45127-421720 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/15/2019 - 4:00 PM) Page 5 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 05/06/2019 Amazon- Weather Radios (2); Key Tags 42.37 05/15/2019 226-45122-421990 05/06/2019 NBP - Paper 34.90 05/15/2019 226-45122-421990 05/06/2019 NBP - Envelopes, Paper, Staples 74.42 05/15/2019 217-41990-421990 05/06/2019 NBP - Paper, Pens 56.32 05/15/2019 101-41310-421990 05/06/2019 Monti Chamber - April Lunch (ML) 15.00 05/15/2019 101-43110-433100 05/06/2019 Monti Chamber - March & April Lunches (JT) 30.00 05/15/2019 213-46301-443990 05/06/2019 Paypal - 2019 NICHA Conference Registration ( 80.00 05/15/2019 226-45122-433100 05/06/2019 Target - Food for Downtown Round Meeting 27.56 05/15/2019 213-46301-443990 05/06/2019 MN Assoc Gov Comm - 2019 Annual Membersl 85.00 05/15/2019 101-41310-443300 05/06/2019 MN GFOA - 2019 Annual Membership (WO) 50.00 05/15/2019 101-41520-443300 05/06/2019 Trusted Employees - April Background Checks ( 111.00 05/15/2019 101-45201-431990 05/06/2019 Trusted Employees - April Background Checks ( 23.00 05/15/2019 217-41990-431990 05/06/2019 Trusted Employees - April Background Checks ( 23.00 05/15/2019 226-45122-431990 05/06/2019 Nat'l Gym Supply - Wheels for Spin Bikes (3) 109.08 05/15/2019 226-45126-422990 05/06/2019 Amazon - 201b Dumbbell Sets (4) 175.68 05/15/2019 226-45127-421720 05/06/2019 Dacotah Paper - Cleaning Supplies 82.04 05/15/2019 101-45501-421990 05/06/2019 Dacotah Paper - Paper Towels 59.86 05/15/2019 656-00000-202099 05/06/2019 Dacotah Paper - Concession Supplies: Gloves, C 445.77 05/15/2019 226-45125-421990 05/06/2019 Dacotah Paper - Bathroom/Locker Room Supplii 3,111.94 05/15/2019 226-45126-421990 05/06/2019 Amazon - Heater, Coffee Carage, Markers, 105.74 05/15/2019 101-41310-421990 05/06/2019 Grand View Lodge - APWA MN Chapter 19 Cor 527.08 05/15/2019 101-43110-433100 05/06/2019 Cintas - Inv# 4019775915 - Mats 22.57 05/15/2019 217-41990-431990 05/06/2019 Cintas - Inv# 4019776301, 4020204664 92.46 05/15/2019 226-45126-431990 05/06/2019 Amazon - Sheet Protectors, Signs, 39.89 05/15/2019 226-45122-421990 05/06/2019 Recreation Supply - Replacement Wheels for WE 268.00 05/15/2019 226-45124-421990 05/06/2019 Amazon - Projector Screen for PC 52.99 05/15/2019 226-45123-421990 05/06/2019 Amazon - Projector Screen Brackets for PC 11.49 05/15/2019 226-45123-421990 05/06/2019 Nelson Bros - Great River Trail Meeting (JO) 16.00 05/15/2019 101-41310-433100 05/06/2019 Cintas - Inv# 4018146925, 4018952955 94.15 05/15/2019 226-45126-431990 05/06/2019 Cintas - Inv# 4017759950 - Mats 19.60 05/15/2019 101-45501-431990 05/06/2019 Cintas - Inv# 4018952356 - Mats 20.07 05/15/2019 217-41990-431990 05/06/2019 NBP - Pens, Picture Hanging Strip, 149.56 05/15/2019 101-41310-421990 05/06/2019 NBP - Paper, Sign Holder 74.95 05/15/2019 217-41990-421990 05/06/2019 Amazon - Flash Drives, Headphones, Mints, Col 222.54 05/15/2019 101-41310-421990 05/06/2019 NBP - Calculator Paper, Frame 30.31 05/15/2019 217-41990-421990 05/06/2019 Amazon - Pencil Sharpener, Batteries 44.43 05/15/2019 226-45122-421990 05/06/2019 Amazon - Replace Diaper Champ, Colored Penc 70.97 05/15/2019 226-45127-421990 05/06/2019 Amazon - Replace Weighted Balls (4); Resistanc 184.57 05/15/2019 226-45127-421720 05/06/2019 Von Hanson Snacks - Pretzels for Concession Rc 41.50 05/15/2019 226-45125-425410 05/06/2019 NPELRA - 2019 Membership (TE) 215.00 05/15/2019 101-41800-443300 05/06/2019 General Credit Forms - CC Tape 122.57 05/15/2019 217-41990-421990 05/06/2019 123 SignUp - Northstar Chapter Meeting 5/16/15 35.00 05/15/2019 101-41520-433100 05/06/2019 JP Cooke - Ink for Stampers (3) 31.30 05/15/2019 217-41990-421990 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/15/2019 - 4:00 PM) Page 6 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 05/06/2019 U of M CCE - 2019 APEA MN Chapter Spring ( 235.00 05/15/2019 101-43110-433100 05/06/2019 Holiday - Unleaded Fuel - 4.459 gals @ $2.779 - 12.39 05/15/2019 101-45201-421200 05/06/2019 Advanced Disposal - March 2019 37,065.64 05/15/2019 101-43230-438400 05/06/2019 Advanced Disposal - March 2019 - Recycling 13,283.85 05/15/2019 101-43230-438400 05/06/2019 Advanced Disposal - March 2019 - GFEE 2,979.76 05/15/2019 101-00000-208120 05/06/2019 Advanced Disposal - March 2019 35.80 05/15/2019 101-43127-438400 05/06/2019 Advanced Disposal - March 2019 47.74 05/15/2019 101-45201-438400 05/06/2019 Advanced Disposal - March 2019 23.87 05/15/2019 101-45201-438400 05/06/2019 Advanced Disposal - March 2019 113.38 05/15/2019 602-49480-438400 05/06/2019 Advanced Disposal - March 2019 208.87 05/15/2019 226-45126-438400 05/06/2019 Advanced Disposal - March 2019 23.87 05/15/2019 609-49754-438400 05/06/2019 Advanced Disposal - March 2019 23.87 05/15/2019 101-45201-438400 05/06/2019 Advanced Disposal - March 2019 11.93 05/15/2019 101-45501-431990 05/06/2019 Monti Napa - fuel filter 2.30 05/15/2019 101-45201-422100 05/06/2019 Runnings - Hillman bulk bin - Water 3.99 05/15/2019 601-49440-421990 05/06/2019 Monti Napa - (2) grease cap 4.98 05/15/2019 101-43127-421990 05/06/2019 Runnings - 500' twine 6.59 05/15/2019 101-45201-421650 05/06/2019 Home Depot -gloves; 10' #2 prime 19.64 05/15/2019 101-43120-421990 05/06/2019 Fastenal - bi-metal blades 50ct; (20) PB Flt. 1/2- 20.13 05/15/2019 101-43127-421990 05/06/2019 Cub - resale - (15) lemons; (16) limes 20.19 05/15/2019 609-49750-425500 05/06/2019 Amazon - hydrant wrench for Tender 7 25.66 05/15/2019 101-42200-422110 05/06/2019 Home Depot - margin trowel; (2) 60 lb. Quikrete 29.88 05/15/2019 101-43130-421990 05/06/2019 Amazon -(24) pr. drumsticks 31.49 05/15/2019 101-45204-421990 05/06/2019 Runnings - broom; (3) oil -dry absorb.; scrub bru; 55.95 05/15/2019 101-45201-421650 05/06/2019 DISH - 5/2-6/1/2019 service 76.99 05/15/2019 609-49754-432500 05/06/2019 Monti Napa - Filter; napagold fuel filter 89.90 05/15/2019 101-43127-422120 05/06/2019 Walmart - dirt devil vacuum 91.27 05/15/2019 609-49754-421990 05/06/2019 K-1 Tailors - cleaning (6) blazers; (6) shirts; (2) , 103.80 05/15/2019 609-49754-431990 05/06/2019 Cintas - mat serv. -inv. #4020204597 127.10 05/15/2019 609-49754-431990 05/06/2019 Monti Napa - oil/grease pump; (10) oil dry; (4) s 217.90 05/15/2019 101-43127-421990 05/06/2019 Arctic Glacier - resale inv. # 1956910507; #195( 220.14 05/15/2019 609-49750-425500 05/06/2019 Dyna-capscrew metric; terminal nylon; (300) ca 517.07 05/15/2019 101-45201-421650 05/06/2019 Royal Tire - #116 - (2) BS M799 mixed service; 1,013.90 05/15/2019 101-43120-422200 05/06/2019 Global Indust.- (12) metal 48gal. trash cont; (12) 3,153.56 05/15/2019 101-45201-421650 05/06/2019 Amazon - (2) flashlight batteries - Fire 43.68 05/15/2019 101-42200-421990 05/06/2019 Amazon - (2) water filter cartridge; Force Case- 72.14 05/15/2019 101-43110-421990 05/06/2019 Force America - (3) Eaton Rocker switch; (3) gn 79.62 05/15/2019 101-43120-422110 05/06/2019 Dakota Supply -(20) mtr flng gskt; (200) meter g 131.90 05/15/2019 601-49440-422701 05/06/2019 PayPal- Rest. Supply- (1) Hvy. Duty Dome Top 88.99 05/15/2019 101-45201-421650 05/06/2019 NBP - Paper 69.80 05/15/2019 217-41990-421990 05/06/2019 NBP - Floor Cleaner, Screen Wipes, Envelopes, 89.99 05/15/2019 217-41990-421990 05/06/2019 NBP - Paper 139.60 05/15/2019 101-41310-421990 05/06/2019 NBP - Paper 29.08 05/15/2019 226-45122-421990 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/15/2019 - 4:00 PM) Page 7 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 05/06/2019 NBP - Return Paper -53.98 05/15/2019 217-41990-421990 05/06/2019 NBP - Return Paper -53.98 05/15/2019 217-41990-421990 05/06/2019 PayPal - 2019 NICHA Conference Registration ( 80.00 05/15/2019 226-45122-433100 05/06/2019 Adobe - Creative Cloud Software Annual Renev� 599.88 05/15/2019 101-41310-443990 05/06/2019 Adobe - Creative Cloud Sales Tax to Be Refunde 44.24 05/15/2019 101-00000-115030 05/06/2019 Wall Street Journal - Monthly Subscription (WO 44.99 05/15/2019 101-41520-443300 05/06/2019 Home Depot - 2 Piece Utility Bracket for Wareb 2.98 05/15/2019 226-45126-422990 05/06/2019 Weebly - Website for MCC (2 yr Renewal) 159.00 05/15/2019 226-45122-430900 05/06/2019 Dyna - return shop supplies -150.52 05/15/2019 101-43127-421990 05/06/2019 Zep - doz. AD7335 Zep2000; doz. Brake Wash 230.51 05/15/2019 101-43127-421300 Check Total: 113,273.59 Vendor: 2438 VANCO SERVICES LLC Check Sequence: 7 ACH Enabled: True 00009751303 Vanco - Gateway Exchange - April 2019 54.62 05/15/2019 601-49440-443980 00009751303 Vanco - Gateway Exchange - April 2019 54.62 05/15/2019 602-49490-443980 Check Total: 109.24 Vendor: 2405 WELLS FARGO - Monthly Charges/Returns Check Sequence: 8 ACH Enabled: True May 2019 Wells Fargo account interest earnings -107.64 05/15/2019 101-00000-362110 May 2019 Wells Fargo account bank charges 1,095.05 05/15/2019 101-41520-443980 May 2019 MCC CC Fees (WF - Front Desk -0997) 1,441.99 05/15/2019 226-45122-443980 May 2019 MCC CC Fees (WF - Online - 0996) 49.03 05/15/2019 226-45122-443980 May 2019 MCC CC Fees (iAccess- Fmrs Mkt- 1476) 87.90 05/15/2019 226-45127-431992 May 2019 Liquor Store CC Fees (WF - 0990) 6,661.89 05/15/2019 609-49754-443980 May 2019 City Hall CC Fees (WF - 0999) 162.48 05/15/2019 101-41520-443980 May 2019 Utility CC Fees (Bluefin) 1,058.45 05/15/2019 601-49440-443980 May 2019 Utility CC Fees (Bluefin) 1,058.45 05/15/2019 602-49490-443980 May 2019 Utility CC Fees (AmEx - 8910) 65.99 05/15/2019 601-49440-443980 May 2019 Utility CC Fees (AmEx - 8910) 65.98 05/15/2019 602-49490-443980 May 2019 MCC ACH Returns 53.00 05/15/2019 226-00000-115031 May 2019 Liquor Store Refund 32.72 05/15/2019 609-49754-443100 Check Total: 11,725.29 Vendor: 1577 WRIGHT CO AUDITOR-TREAS - ACH Check Sequence: 9 ACH Enabled: True 20826 248203 R 155-010-052131 - EDA - 1 st & 2nd Half Payn 1,553.75 05/15/2019 213-46301-437100 Check Total: 1,553.75 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/15/2019 - 4:00 PM) Page 8 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Total for Check Run: 217,527.13 Total of Number of Checks: The preceding list of bills payable was reviewed and approved for payment. Date: 5/28/19 Approved by Mayor Brian Stumpf AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/15/2019 - 4:00 PM) Page 9 Accounts Payable Computer Check Proof List by Vendor User: Debbie.Davidson Printed: 05/22/2019 - 2:31PM Batch: 00204.05.2019 - 204.05.2019 AP Invoice No Description Vendor: 5244 A-1 CONCRETE LEVELING 5/20/2019 Raise 2 Sections of Concrete @ Head End Build 5/20/2019- 2 Raise 5 Sections of Concrete @ Hi -Way Liquor 5/8/2019 Check Total: Vendor: 3491 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3342982 resale - beer 3344250 resale - beer 3345858 resale - beer Amount Payment Date Acct Number Check Sequence: 1 550.00 05/29/2019 656-00000-202099 825.00 05/29/2019 609-49754-440100 1,375.00 Moiiii6effo Y Reference ACH Enabled: False Check Total: Vendor: 4502 ARVIG 5/8/2019 05/29/2019 IT Services- May 2019 Check Total: Vendor: 5117 ASPEN MILLS 236499 (2) sets dress blues- MB; CB 65.20 05/29/2019 Check Total: Vendor: 5243 DAVID BARTHOLOMAY 2/19/2019 2019 Leadership Growth Group Series Check Total: Vendor: 1065 BELLBOY CORPORATION 69569900 Enabled: freight 69569900 05/29/2019 resale - liquor 69569900 resale - wine 69682200 resale - liquor 69682200 resale - wine Amount Payment Date Acct Number Check Sequence: 1 550.00 05/29/2019 656-00000-202099 825.00 05/29/2019 609-49754-440100 1,375.00 Moiiii6effo Y Reference ACH Enabled: False AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/22/2019 - 2:31 PM) Page 1 Check Sequence: 2 ACH Enabled: False 362.75 05/29/2019 609-49750-425200 33.80 05/29/2019 609-49750-425200 65.20 05/29/2019 609-49750-425200 461.75 Check Sequence: 3 ACH Enabled: True 73.00 05/29/2019 702-00000-431990 73.00 Check Sequence: 4 ACH Enabled: False 630.42 05/29/2019 101-42200-421120 630.42 Check Sequence: 5 ACH Enabled: False 600.00 05/29/2019 213-46301-433100 600.00 Check Sequence: 6 ACH Enabled: True 14.67 05/29/2019 609-49750-433300 747.18 05/29/2019 609-49750-425100 84.00 05/29/2019 609-49750-425300 337.40 05/29/2019 609-49750-425100 80.00 05/29/2019 609-49750-425300 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/22/2019 - 2:31 PM) Page 1 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number 69682200 freight 8.10 05/29/2019 609-49750-433300 99442000 resale - mix 54.30 05/29/2019 609-49750-425400 99442000 resale - condiments 33.00 05/29/2019 609-49750-425500 99442000 asst. bags 53.70 05/29/2019 609-49754-421990 99442000 freight 0.64 05/29/2019 609-49750-433300 99479800 freight 0.14 05/29/2019 609-49750-433300 99479800 resale - condiments 31.50 05/29/2019 609-49750-425500 Check Total: 1,444.63 Vendor: 1067 BERNICK'S Check Sequence: 7 65589 resale - soda pop 175.30 05/29/2019 609-49750-425400 65589 resale -juice 32.80 05/29/2019 609-49750-425500 65590 resale - beer 2,086.90 05/29/2019 609-49750-425200 68601 resale - pop, Gatorade, 181.38 05/29/2019 226-45125-425410 68603 resale - soda pap 65.80 05/29/2019 609-49750-425400 68603 resale -juice 16.40 05/29/2019 609-49750-425500 Check Total: 2,558.58 Vendor: 1074 BOLTON AND MENK INC Check Sequence: 8 0232094 18C001 - 2019 Pedestrian Improvements 350.00 05/29/2019 400-43300-459013 0232182 18C009 - Walnut Street Improvements 18,645.00 05/29/2019 400-43300-431990 Check Total: 18,995.00 Vendor: 1080 BRAEMAR MAILING SERVICE INC Check Sequence: 9 59875 UB May 2019 Invoices (3685) Print, Fold, Stuff, 570.78 05/29/2019 601-49440-431800 59875 UB May 2019 Invoices (3685) Print, Fold, Stuff, 570.77 05/29/2019 602-49490-431800 59875 Summer of Happiness Guide Inserts for UB Billi 391.85 05/29/2019 101-45201-435100 59875 Inserts for UB Billing (3685) 36.85 05/29/2019 226-45122-434990 59875 Stormwater Inserts for UB Billing (3685) 181.85 05/29/2019 263-49200-431990 Check Total: 1,752.10 Vendor: 4328 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN WINE & SP1I Check Sequence: 10 1080969013 resale -liquor 2,284.52 05/29/2019 609-49750-425100 1080969013 resale- wine 160.00 05/29/2019 609-49750-425300 1080969013 freight 26.68 05/29/2019 609-49750-433300 1080969074 resale - beer 82.95 05/29/2019 609-49750-425200 1080972397 resale -liquor 1,484.25 05/29/2019 609-49750-425100 1080972397 resale - wine 40.00 05/29/2019 609-49750-425300 1080972397 freight 40.77 05/29/2019 609-49750-433300 1080972397 resale - wine 773.83 05/29/2019 609-49750-425300 Reference ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/22/2019 - 2:31 PM) Page 2 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Credit Beer resale - beer credit inv (3) 2018 -current -103.75 05/29/2019 609-49750-425200 Credit Liquor resale - liquor credit inv (24) 2018 -current -4,012.38 05/29/2019 609-49750-425100 Credit M.Tax resale - mix credit inv (3) 2018 -current -204.97 05/29/2019 609-49750-425200 Credit Wine resale - wine credit inv (5) 2018 -current -468.95 05/29/2019 609-49750-425300 Check Total: 102.95 Vendor: 1091 CAMPBELL KNUTSON PA Check Sequence: 11 ACH Enabled: True 2348-000G 201 Engineering Legal - April 2019 48.00 05/29/2019 101-43111-430400 2348-000G 201 Planning & Zoning Legal - April 2019 80.00 05/29/2019 101-41910-430400 2348-000G 201 General Legal - April 2019 3,599.00 05/29/2019 101-41610-430400 2348-000G 201 16C006 - Fallon Ave - April 2019 80.00 05/29/2019 400-43300-459018 2348-000G 201 201815 - Haven Ridge - April 2019 560.00 05/29/2019 101-00000-220110 2348-000G 201 201911 - Spirit Hills CUP Amendment - April 2( 144.00 05/29/2019 101-00000-220110 2348-000G 201 19D001 - Featherstone 4th Addition - April 201S 32.00 05/29/2019 101-00000-220110 2348-OO1G 117 Code Enforcement Services - April 2019 172.00 05/29/2019 101-42400-430400 2348-144G 7 201907 - Spaeth Industrial Park Plat - April 2015 101.40 05/29/2019 101-00000-220110 2348-148G 21 16C006 - Fallon Ave Condemnation - April 2015 1,570.50 05/29/2019 400-43300-459018 2348-156G 5 19D001 - Featherstone 4th Addition -April 201 S 465.00 05/29/2019 101-00000-220110 2348-157G 4 19D002 - Groveland 5th Addition - April 2019 80.20 05/29/2019 101-00000-220110 2348-158G 1 Jameson Quiet Title Action - April 2019 417.50 05/29/2019 101-41610-430400 2348-159G 1 Ellison House Purchase - April 2019 48.00 05/29/2019 101-41610-430400 Check Total: 7,397.60 Vendor: 4646 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES L.P. Check Sequence: 12 ACH Enabled: True 2261606 resale - beer 13,095.70 05/29/2019 609-49750-425200 2264824 resale - beer 16,648.55 05/29/2019 609-49750-425200 Check Total: 29,744.25 Vendor: 5239 CARLO LACHMANSINGH SALES, INC. Check Sequence: 13 ACH Enabled: False 6344 (3) steel foundation w/ hardware - Fallon Ave. hi 1,785.00 05/29/2019 101-43160-421530 Check Total: 1,785.00 Vendor: 1095 CARLOS CREEK WINERY INC Check Sequence: 14 ACH Enabled: False 17222 resale - wine 792.00 05/29/2019 609-49750-425300 17246 resale - wine 480.00 05/29/2019 609-49750-425300 Check Total: 1,272.00 Vendor: 4158 COMMERCIAL ASPHALT COMPANY Check Sequence: 15 ACH Enabled: False 190515 (11.2) T hotmix 649.04 05/29/2019 101-43120-422400 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/22/2019 - 2:31 PM) Page 3 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 649.04 Check Total: Vendor: 3831 RAELYNN COOK 5/20/2019 Mileage Reimbursement - May APA Chapter Me 5/12/2019 Check Total: Vendor: 1129 DAHLHEIMER BEVERAGE LLC 112-0197 resale - beer 112-0197 resale - beer n/a 112-0197 resale - meat stick 112-0241 resale - beer 112-0241 resale - beer n/a 112-0261 resale - beer 112-0291 resale - beer 112-0296 resale - beer 842741 resale - beer credit 844394 resale - beer 844702 resale - beer credit 844834 resale - beer credit Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 649.04 Check Total: Vendor: 2050 DEMVI LLC 5/12/2019 June - Parking Lot Easement Maint Agreement Check Sequence: 16 ACH Enabled: Check Total: Vendor: 5201 DICK FAMILY, INC. 5250069 resale - beer 32.48 Check Total: Vendor: 1153 ECM PUBLISHERS INC 695402 Cornerstone Cafe PH Ad# 937848 Check Sequence: 17 ACH Enabled: Check Total: Vendor: 1165 EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINTENANCE 104439 Ladder 1 - safety inspection; service pump; oil ai 27.00 Check Total: Vendor: 2273 FIBERNET MONTICELLO - ACH AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/22/2019 - 2:31 PM) Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 649.04 Check Sequence: 16 ACH Enabled: True 32.48 05/29/2019 101-41520-433100 32.48 Check Sequence: 17 ACH Enabled: True 6,648.90 05/29/2019 609-49750-425200 27.00 05/29/2019 609-49750-425400 30.00 05/29/2019 609-49750-425500 22,469.80 05/29/2019 609-49750-425200 257.00 05/29/2019 609-49750-425400 5,471.15 05/29/2019 609-49750-425200 77.50 05/29/2019 609-49750-425200 346.10 05/29/2019 609-49750-425200 -389.30 05/29/2019 609-49750-425200 342.00 05/29/2019 609-49750-425200 -192.00 05/29/2019 609-49750-425200 -25.50 05/29/2019 609-49750-425200 35,062.65 Check Sequence: 18 ACH Enabled: False 121.60 05/29/2019 213-46301-443990 121.60 Check Sequence: 19 ACH Enabled: True 251.20 05/29/2019 609-49750-425200 251.20 Check Sequence: 20 ACH Enabled: True 129.22 05/29/2019 213-46301-435100 129.22 Check Sequence: 21 ACH Enabled: True 2,073.08 05/29/2019 101-42200-440500 2,073.08 Check Sequence: 22 ACH Enabled: True Page 4 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 5/8/2019 May 2019 - Phone - City Hall 646.46 05/29/2019 702-00000-432100 5/8/2019 May 2019 - Phone - MCC 553.04 05/29/2019 702-00000-432100 5/8/2019 May 2019 - Phone - Ballfields 19.50 05/29/2019 702-00000-432100 5/8/2019 May 2019 - Phone - DMV 266.86 05/29/2019 702-00000-432100 5/8/2019 May 2019 - Phone - Hi Way Liquor 342.65 05/29/2019 702-00000-432100 5/8/2019 May 2019 - Phone - Fire Hall 215.38 05/29/2019 702-00000-432100 5/8/2019 May 2019 - Phone - Public Works 270.82 05/29/2019 702-00000-432100 5/8/2019 May 2019 - Phone - Parks 113.94 05/29/2019 702-00000-432100 5/8/2019 May 2019 - Phone - Prairie Center 14.22 05/29/2019 702-00000-432100 5/8/2019 May 2019 - Phone - Sheriff 69.80 05/29/2019 702-00000-432100 5/8/2019 May 2019 - Internet - City Hall 134.95 05/29/2019 702-00000-432300 5/8/2019 May 2019 - Internet - MCC 10.00 05/29/2019 702-00000-432300 5/8/2019 May 2019 - Internet - Ballfields 10.00 05/29/2019 702-00000-432300 5/8/2019 May 2019 - Internet - DMV 41.95 05/29/2019 702-00000-432300 5/8/2019 May 2019 - Internet - Hi Way Liquor 41.95 05/29/2019 702-00000-432300 5/8/2019 May 2019 - Internet - Fire Hall 41.95 05/29/2019 702-00000-432300 5/8/2019 May 2019 - Internet - Animal Shelter 29.95 05/29/2019 702-00000-432300 5/8/2019 May 2019 - Internet - Public Works 69.95 05/29/2019 702-00000-432300 5/8/2019 May 2019 - Internet - Sheriff 41.95 05/29/2019 702-00000-432300 5/8/2019 May 2019 - Internet - MCC @ Prairie Center 40.63 05/29/2019 702-00000-432300 5/8/2019 May 2019 - Cable - Fire Hall 5.11 05/29/2019 101-42200-431990 5/8/2019 May 2019 - Cable - City Hall 12.95 05/29/2019 101-41310-431990 5/8/2019 May 2019 - Cable - MCC 338.01 05/29/2019 226-45127-432500 5/8/2019 May 2019 - Data Hosting - City Hall 500.00 05/29/2019 702-00000-431900 5/8/2019 May 2019 - Service Contract - City Hall 250.00 05/29/2019 702-00000-431900 Check Total: 4,082.02 Vendor: 5246 FLIGHT LIGHT INC. Check Sequence: 23 ACH Enabled: False 68019 -IN Water Tower clearance light 181.30 05/29/2019 601-49440-422100 Check Total: 181.30 Vendor: 1859 GODFATHER'S EXTERMINATING INC Check Sequence: 24 ACH Enabled: False 141055 Pest Control - Hi -Way Liquor 59.06 05/29/2019 609-49754-431990 Check Total: 59.06 Vendor: 1205 GRAINGER INC Check Sequence: 25 ACH Enabled: False 9169044634 Slide Latch Door HDW Outswing; Fuse Dual El, 65.15 05/29/2019 226-45126-422990 9173697864 Mini Sweeper 75.10 05/29/2019 226-45126-422990 Check Total: 140.25 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/22/2019 - 2:31 PM) Page 5 Invoice No Description Vendor: 4743 GRAND CASTLE 5/16/2019 Escrow Refund - 1220 Prairie Pine Court/Club V Amount Check Total: Vendor: 1223 HAWKINS INC 4492444 Aluminum Sulfate Liquid - WWTP 5-21-19 Check Total: Vendor: 4218 HOHENSTEINS, INC 137720 resale - beer 5-21-19 Check Total: Vendor: 3356 INDIAN ISLAND WINERY 2661 resale- wine Amount Payment Date Check Total: Vendor: 5247 J & R LARSON GROUNDS 5-21-19 Check Sequence: 26 refund Water Use Permit- Dep. $2000-$67.54 us, 5-21-19 2,000.00 refund Water Use Permit- Dep. $2000-$67.54 us, 5-21-19 refund Water Use Permit- Dep. $2000-$67.54 us, 2,000.00 Check Total: Vendor: 5245 JERRY KONZ Pay Voucher #I 16C006 - Pay Voucher #1 - Fallon Ave Landscap ACH Enabled: True Check Total: Vendor: 1259 JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING 2964759 6,480.65 resale - beer 2964759 resale - beer n/a 2964759 freight 2964782 False resale - beer 2964782 609-49750-425200 freight 1,367.70 Check Total: Vendor: 1260 JME OF MONTICELLO INC SYS48591 Engine 1- brakes- Piggy Back LS Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Check Sequence: 26 ACH Enabled: False 2,000.00 05/29/2019 101-00000-220110 2,000.00 Check Sequence: 27 ACH Enabled: True 6,480.65 05/29/2019 602-49480-421990 6,480.65 Check Sequence: 28 ACH Enabled: False 1,367.70 05/29/2019 609-49750-425200 1,367.70 Check Sequence: 29 ACH Enabled: False 111.84 05/29/2019 609-49750-425300 111.84 Check Sequence: 30 ACH Enabled: False 2,000.00 05/29/2019 601-00000-220111 -62.90 05/29/2019 601-49440-371100 -4.64 05/29/2019 601-00000-208100 1,932.46 Check Sequence: 31 ACH Enabled: False 33,734.97 05/29/2019 400-43300-459018 33,734.97 Check Sequence: 32 ACH Enabled: False 1,248.25 05/29/2019 609-49750-425200 50.90 05/29/2019 609-49750-425400 3.00 05/29/2019 609-49750-433300 1,712.15 05/29/2019 609-49750-425200 3.00 05/29/2019 609-49750-433300 3,017.30 Check Sequence: 33 ACH Enabled: True 206.39 05/29/2019 101-42200-440440 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/22/2019 - 2:31 PM) Page 6 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Check Total: 206.39 Vendor: 1263 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. Check Sequence: 34 1281936 resale -liquor 2,745.94 05/29/2019 609-49750-425100 1281936 freight 37.10 05/29/2019 609-49750-433300 1281937 freight 24.59 05/29/2019 609-49750-433300 1281937 resale- wine 471.52 05/29/2019 609-49750-425300 1281937 resale - mix 242.30 05/29/2019 609-49750-425400 1283118 resale - liquor 5,950.90 05/29/2019 609-49750-425100 1283118 freight 56.74 05/29/2019 609-49750-433300 1283119 freight 30.86 05/29/2019 609-49750-433300 1283119 resale- wine 1,075.31 05/29/2019 609-49750-425300 1283120 resale -beer 112.25 05/29/2019 609-49750-425200 1285557 resale - liquor 2,024.16 05/29/2019 609-49750-425100 1285557 freight 28.31 05/29/2019 609-49750-433300 1285558 freight 5.96 05/29/2019 609-49750-433300 1285558 resale- wine 202.30 05/29/2019 609-49750-425300 1287285 freight 57.66 05/29/2019 609-49750-433300 1287285 resale - liquor 4,418.49 05/29/2019 609-49750-425100 1287286 resale - wine 1,280.45 05/29/2019 609-49750-425300 1287286 resale - wine n/a 110.95 05/29/2019 609-49750-425400 1287286 freight 44.70 05/29/2019 609-49750-433300 1288481 freight 60.91 05/29/2019 609-49750-433300 1288481 resale - liquor 4,806.46 05/29/2019 609-49750-425100 1288482 resale - wine 2,283.50 05/29/2019 609-49750-425300 1288482 freight 56.87 05/29/2019 609-49750-433300 1288483 resale - beer 25.60 05/29/2019 609-49750-425200 1289009 freight 14.90 05/29/2019 609-49750-433300 1289009 resale - beer 870.00 05/29/2019 609-49750-425200 1290935 resale - liquor 4,688.38 05/29/2019 609-49750-425100 1290935 freight 78.72 05/29/2019 609-49750-433300 1290936 freight 29.80 05/29/2019 609-49750-433300 1290936 resale- wine 924.15 05/29/2019 609-49750-425300 254402 freight credit inv. #1281111 -1.49 05/29/2019 609-49750-433300 254402 resale wine credit inv. #1281111 -55.15 05/29/2019 609-49750-425300 541298 freight - credit inv. # 1277776 -4.59 05/29/2019 609-49750-433300 541298 resale- liquor credit inv. # 1277776 -369.70 05/29/2019 609-49750-425100 541958 resale - liquor credit inv. #1280433 -94.67 05/29/2019 609-49750-425100 541958 freight - credit inv. #1280433 -1.49 05/29/2019 609-49750-433300 542539 resale wine credit inv. #1283118 -19.80 05/29/2019 609-49750-425300 542539 freight- credit inv.#1283118 -0.12 05/29/2019 609-49750-433300 542540 freight - credit inv. #1283119 -1.49 05/29/2019 609-49750-433300 Reference ACH Enabled: False AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/22/2019 - 2:31 PM) Page 7 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 542540 resael - wine credit inv. #1283119 -38.85 05/29/2019 609-49750-433300 Check Total: 32,172.43 Vendor: 5242 LAKE CRYSTAL AREA RECREATION CENT Check Sequence: 35 ACH Enabled: False 5/16/2019 Used Dumbbell Rack 50.00 05/29/2019 226-45127-421720 Check Total: 50.00 Vendor: 3829 STEVE LANGANKI Check Sequence: 36 ACH Enabled: True 1173 Porta Toilet Rental (21) 4/1-28/2018; (2) Bertran 1,257.43 05/29/2019 101-45201-431990 Check Total: 1,257.43 Vendor: 1297 LOCATORS & SUPPLIES INC Check Sequence: 37 ACH Enabled: False 275947 (6) 10' Type 1 Barricade set 901.00 05/29/2019 101-43120-422600 Check Total: 901.00 Vendor: 4456 LUPULIN BREWING LLC Check Sequence: 38 ACH Enabled: True 20902 resale - beer 240.00 05/29/2019 609-49750-425200 Check Total: 240.00 Vendor: 1303 M AMUNDSON CIGAR & CANDY CO, LLP Check Sequence: 39 ACH Enabled: True 280093 resale - cigarettes; juice 1,497.69 05/29/2019 609-49750-425500 280093 resale - tocabbo; barware 295.00 05/29/2019 609-49750-425400 Check Total: 1,792.69 Vendor: 1229 MARRS ADVERTISING & DESIGN INC Check Sequence: 40 ACH Enabled: True 1651 Walk N Roll Pathports (2,500) 529.00 05/29/2019 101-45130-444140 Check Total: 529.00 Vendor: 3745 MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY Check Sequence: 41 ACH Enabled: True 21292685 (553) gal. diesel @ $2.65 1,464.51 05/29/2019 101-43120-421200 21292711 (827) gal. undeaded @ $2.39 1,978.77 05/29/2019 101-43120-421200 Check Total: 3,443.28 Vendor: 1726 MARCO TECHNOLOGIES Check Sequence: 42 ACH Enabled: False INV6331879 5/10/19 - 6/9/19 Contract Payment 935.58 05/29/2019 702-00000-441500 INV6331879 Supply Freight Fee 46.00 05/29/2019 702-00000-441500 INV6331880 5/10/19 - 6/9/19 Contract Payment 214.29 05/29/2019 702-00000-441500 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/22/2019 - 2:31 PM) Page 8 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number 1,195.87 149.23 149.23 501.85 501.85 19,500.00 19,500.00 35,919.30 35,919.30 5,150.00 5,150.00 1,632.00 1,632.00 150.00 150.00 14.09 14.09 11,114.25 Check Sequence: 43 05/29/2019 101-45201-421650 Check Sequence: 44 05/29/2019 101-45201-422100 Check Sequence: 45 05/29/2019 101-41540-430100 Check Sequence: 46 05/29/2019 101-00000-217061 Check Sequence: 47 05/29/2019 101-45175-444310 Check Sequence: 48 05/29/2019 226-45127-431990 Check Sequence: 49 05/29/2019 101-45204-431990 Check Sequence: 50 05/29/2019 226-45122-433100 Check Sequence: 51 05/29/2019 400-43300-452010 Reference ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: False Page 9 Check Total: Vendor: 1329 MIDWEST PLAYSCAPES INC 8350 (6) swing latch Check Total: Vendor: 4216 MINNESOTA EQUIPMENT P91174 #217 - alternator kit; (2) seals; v -belt Check Total: Vendor: 1341 MMKR 46324 Progress Billing - Audit Services thru 4/30/19 Check Total: Vendor: 5147 MN PEIP 846738 June - Health Insurance Check Total: Vendor: 1377 MONTICELLO SENIOR CENTER May 2019 Monthly Allocation - May 2019 Check Total: Vendor: 1379 MONTICELLO UMPIRE ASSOCIATION 5/21/2019 Umpire Mens Tuesday Softball League (48 Gam Check Total: Vendor: 4988 BARBARA ANN MOON 5/21/2019 Performance at Farmers Market as "Aunt Poopsi Check Total: Vendor: 4549 ANN MOSACK 5/10/2019 Mileage Reimbursement - May (24.3 miles) Check Total: Vendor: 5160 MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC. 16051553 18C003-CONSTR - Fire Hall APX Concolette; AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/22/2019 - 2:31 PM) Amount Payment Date Acct Number 1,195.87 149.23 149.23 501.85 501.85 19,500.00 19,500.00 35,919.30 35,919.30 5,150.00 5,150.00 1,632.00 1,632.00 150.00 150.00 14.09 14.09 11,114.25 Check Sequence: 43 05/29/2019 101-45201-421650 Check Sequence: 44 05/29/2019 101-45201-422100 Check Sequence: 45 05/29/2019 101-41540-430100 Check Sequence: 46 05/29/2019 101-00000-217061 Check Sequence: 47 05/29/2019 101-45175-444310 Check Sequence: 48 05/29/2019 226-45127-431990 Check Sequence: 49 05/29/2019 101-45204-431990 Check Sequence: 50 05/29/2019 226-45122-433100 Check Sequence: 51 05/29/2019 400-43300-452010 Reference ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: False Page 9 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number 11,114.25 Check Total: Vendor: 1390 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 1210025-01 #230 - coil valve; nut & o -ring 58355 Check Total: Vendor: 1401 NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANT 24206 April 2019 Technical Assistance - City Projects 24207 201911 - Spirit Hills - April 2019 24207 201907 - Spaeth PUD - April 2019 24207 201910 - Headwaters Senior CUP - April 2019 24208 April 2019 Technical Assistance - Meetings 2,185.56 Check Total: Vendor: 4472 NOVAK FLECK INC 5/10/2019 Escrow Refund - 4253 86th St NE/Featherstone Amount Payment Date Acct Number 11,114.25 Check Total: Vendor: 1411 OLSON & SONS ELECTRIC INC 58355 material - replace bad ballast & lamp in pole hea 58355 labor- replace bad ballast & lamp in pole head 58376 Troubleshoot Motor Problems 58462 Remove, Rebuild, Reinstall Pump 390.69 Check Total: Vendor: 1273 PAUSTIS & SONS WINE CO 50950 resale - wine 50950 freight 2,185.56 Check Total: Vendor: 1427 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS CO 2548642 freight 2548642 resale - liquor 2548643 resale - wine 2548643 freight 2549601 freight 2549601 resale- liquor 2549602 resale- wine Amount Payment Date Acct Number 11,114.25 Check Sequence: 52 390.69 05/29/2019 101-45201-422100 390.69 Check Sequence: 53 2,185.56 05/29/2019 101-41910-431990 1,539.70 05/29/2019 101-00000-220110 536.30 05/29/2019 101-00000-220110 501.70 05/29/2019 101-00000-220110 150.00 05/29/2019 101-41910-431990 4,913.26 Check Sequence: 54 2,000.00 05/29/2019 101-00000-220110 2,000.00 Check Sequence: 55 211.93 05/29/2019 101-43160-431990 190.00 05/29/2019 101-43160-431990 45.00 05/29/2019 226-45126-440100 1,750.73 05/29/2019 226-45126-440100 2,197.66 Check Sequence: 56 963.95 05/29/2019 609-49750-425300 12.50 05/29/2019 609-49750-433300 976.45 Check Sequence: 57 3.23 05/29/2019 609-49750-433300 586.40 05/29/2019 609-49750-425100 520.00 05/29/2019 609-49750-425300 7.45 05/29/2019 609-49750-433300 24.58 05/29/2019 609-49750-433300 2,033.50 05/29/2019 609-49750-425100 839.75 05/29/2019 609-49750-425300 Reference ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/22/2019 - 2:31 PM) Page 10 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number 2549602 resale- juice 50.28 05/29/2019 609-49750-425500 2549602 freight 20.86 05/29/2019 609-49750-433300 2551475 resale - liquor 1,070.90 05/29/2019 609-49750-425100 2551475 freight 25.33 05/29/2019 609-49750-433300 2552680 resale - liquor 1,380.54 05/29/2019 609-49750-425100 2552680 freight 15.20 05/29/2019 609-49750-433300 2553604 freight 75.99 05/29/2019 609-49750-433300 2553604 resale- liquor 5,932.35 05/29/2019 609-49750-425100 2553605 resale -liquor 144.00 05/29/2019 609-49750-425100 2553605 resale- mix 42.00 05/29/2019 609-49750-425400 2553605 resale- wine 1,223.50 05/29/2019 609-49750-425300 2553605 resale- wine 43.21 05/29/2019 609-49750-425300 2555419 resale - liquor 2,055.50 05/29/2019 609-49750-425100 2555419 freight 46.19 05/29/2019 609-49750-433300 2555420 freight 5.96 05/29/2019 609-49750-433300 2555420 resale- wine 128.75 05/29/2019 609-49750-425300 329452 freight credit inv. 9 2521959 -1.49 05/29/2019 609-49750-433300 329452 resale - liquor credit inv. # 2521959 -103.00 05/29/2019 609-49750-425100 329453 resale - wine credit inv. # 2524538 -9.33 05/29/2019 609-49750-425300 329454 resale - wine credit inv. # 2525020 -43.50 05/29/2019 609-49750-425300 329455 resale - wine credit inv. # 2532790 -14.50 05/29/2019 609-49750-425300 329983 resale - wine credit inv. # 2539778 -9.00 05/29/2019 609-49750-425300 329984 resale - liquor credit inv. # 2541614 -7.69 05/29/2019 609-49750-425100 Check Total: 16,086.96 Vendor: 4022 REINHART FOODSERVICE LLC Check Sequence: 58 726772 Food for Concession Resale 622.54 05/29/2019 226-45125-425410 Check Total: 622.54 Vendor: 5241 RESTORATION & CONSTRUCTION SERVIC Check Sequence: 59 000001 (30) 136-18- removed 10' curb & instl. 30'136-18 900.00 05/29/2019 101-43120-431990 Check Total: 900.00 Vendor: 1470 RUSSELL SECURITY RESOURCE INC Check Sequence: 60 A34834 Rekey Lock Cylinder, Repair Lever Trim on Pan 146.25 05/29/2019 226-45126-440100 Check Total: 146.25 Vendor: 4981 STEVE SCHILLEWAERT Check Sequence: 61 41928 Riverside - April 2019 lawn mntc.; ltr debris picl 800.00 05/29/2019 651-49010-431050 41929 Hillside - April 2019 lawn mntc; litter debris pic] 325.00 05/29/2019 101-45201-431050 Reference ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: False AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/22/2019 - 2:31 PM) Page 11 Invoice No Description Check Total: Vendor: 4627 SCOTT COUNTY IN24034 2019 MN Public Broadband Alliance Membersh Amount Payment Date Acct Number 1,125.00 Reference Check Total: Vendor: 4474 SITE ONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY 91349574-001 Watts RK 009M2 VT F; relief valve rubber kit Check Total: Vendor: 5211 RANDI ANN SMELSER May 2nd Semi Monthly Contract Payment Check Sequence: 63 ACH Enabled: Check Total: Vendor: 5210 ADAM SMIGLEWSKI 5/21/2019 Referee Mens Spring Hockey - 5/19/19 (2 Game Check Total: Vendor: 3309 SOUTHERN GLAZER'S WINE AND SPIRITS. 1804049 ACH Enabled: freight 1804049 05/29/2019 resale - wine 1817200 resale - wine 1817200 freight 1817201 freight 1817201 ACH Enabled: resale - liquor 1817202 05/29/2019 freight 1817202 resale - wine 1819925 freight 1819925 resale- liquor 1819926 ACH Enabled: resale- wine 1819926 05/29/2019 freight Check Total: Vendor: 4672 SPECIALTY SOLUTIONS LLC 148904 42.00 (400) 50 lb. 22-0-6 Lawn Mntc 609-49750-425300 Check Total: Vendor: 5240 SPEEDWAY LLC Amount Payment Date Acct Number 1,125.00 Reference AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/22/2019 - 2:31 PM) Page 12 Check Sequence: 62 ACH Enabled: False 1,500.00 05/29/2019 656-49870-431990 1,500.00 Check Sequence: 63 ACH Enabled: False 165.71 05/29/2019 101-45201-421650 165.71 Check Sequence: 64 ACH Enabled: False 1,575.00 05/29/2019 101-42700-431200 1,575.00 Check Sequence: 65 ACH Enabled: True 80.00 05/29/2019 226-45127-431990 80.00 Check Sequence: 66 ACH Enabled: False 33.83 05/29/2019 609-49750-433300 1,653.84 05/29/2019 609-49750-425300 42.00 05/29/2019 609-49750-425300 1.40 05/29/2019 609-49750-433300 23.33 05/29/2019 609-49750-433300 2,238.44 05/29/2019 609-49750-425100 21.12 05/29/2019 609-49750-433300 1,203.00 05/29/2019 609-49750-425300 15.08 05/29/2019 609-49750-433300 1,359.48 05/29/2019 609-49750-425100 456.00 05/29/2019 609-49750-425300 12.60 05/29/2019 609-49750-433300 7,060.12 Check Sequence: 67 ACH Enabled: False 7,610.00 05/29/2019 101-45201-421600 7,610.00 Check Sequence: 68 ACH Enabled: False AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/22/2019 - 2:31 PM) Page 12 Invoice No Description 5/17/2019 18C001 - Easement Payment for Pedestrian Imps Check Total: Vendor: 5208 SCOTT WALLACE 5/21/2019 Referee Mens Spring Hockey - May 2019 (10 Q Amount Check Total: Vendor: 1518 TDS TELECOM 763-271-3257 TDS 763-295-2005 TDS 763-295-3714 TDS 1,927.86 Check Total: Vendor: 2412 TEE JAY NORTH INC 35240 Nylon Cap for Trac Foot (16) Check Total: Vendor: 4656 TRUE FABRICATIONS, INC. 489134 resale - gift bags; flasks; etc 702-00000-432100 Check Total: Vendor: 1537 UHL COMPANY INC 14264 WO# 14264 - Troubleshoot Condenser Fan Mot( Check Total: Vendor: 1552 VIKING COCA COLA BOTTLING CO 2346255 resale - soda pop 846305 resale - soda pop Check Total: Vendor: 1684 VINOCOPIA 232376 resale - wine 232376 freight 232936 resale - liquor 232936 freight 233046 freight 233046 resale - wine Check Total: Vendor: 5208 SCOTT WALLACE 5/21/2019 Referee Mens Spring Hockey - May 2019 (10 Q Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 1,927.86 05/29/2019 400-43300-459013 1,927.86 Check Sequence: 69 ACH Enabled: True 99.50 05/29/2019 702-00000-432100 20.16 05/29/2019 702-00000-432100 340.78 05/29/2019 702-00000-432100 460.44 Check Sequence: 70 ACH Enabled: False 175.00 05/29/2019 226-45126-422990 175.00 Check Sequence: 71 ACH Enabled: False 201.80 05/29/2019 609-49750-425400 201.80 Check Sequence: 72 ACH Enabled: True 241.00 05/29/2019 226-45126-440100 241.00 Check Sequence: 73 ACH Enabled: True 420.25 05/29/2019 609-49750-425400 468.45 05/29/2019 609-49750-425400 888.70 Check Sequence: 74 ACH Enabled: True 288.00 05/29/2019 609-49750-425300 2.50 05/29/2019 609-49750-433300 267.17 05/29/2019 609-49750-425100 7.50 05/29/2019 609-49750-433300 12.50 05/29/2019 609-49750-433300 480.00 05/29/2019 609-49750-425300 1,057.67 Check Sequence: 75 ACH Enabled: True 400.00 05/29/2019 226-45127-431990 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/22/2019 - 2:31 PM) Page 13 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 400.00 Check Total: Vendor: 4937 MICHAEL WELVAERT 5/21/2019 Referee Mens Spring Hockey - May 2019 (l 1 G: ACH Enabled: Check Total: Vendor: 1567 WES OLSON ELECTRIC LLC 9106 parts (3) wall pacs install behind PW bldg. 9106 labor - (3) wall pacs install behind PW bldg. Check Total: Vendor: 1568 WEST SHERBURNE TRIBUNE 80513 Enabled: Wine Sale - 4/6/19 display 927.44 05/29/2019 Check Total: Vendor: 3258 WESTMOR FLUID SOLUTIONS, LLC 1556315 05/29/2019 (20) Durakey - Shop Check Total: Vendor: 1572 THE WINE COMPANY 105592 resale - wine 105592 freight ACH Enabled: Check Total: Vendor: 1573 WINE MERCHANTS INC 7234813 resale - wine 7234813 freight Check Total: Vendor: 1577 WRIGHT CO AUDITOR-TREAS - ACH 5/17/2019 Enabled: Court Fines & Fees - April 2019 300.31 05/29/2019 Check Total: Vendor: 1579 WRIGHT COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPARTMEN 1362 16C001 -PHASE I - Briarwood study 1/2 Check Total: AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/22/2019 - 2:31 PM) Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 400.00 Check Sequence: 76 ACH Enabled: False 500.00 05/29/2019 226-45127-431990 500.00 Check Sequence: 77 ACH Enabled: False 927.44 05/29/2019 101-45201-431990 292.50 05/29/2019 101-45201-431990 1,219.94 Check Sequence: 78 ACH Enabled: False 389.10 05/29/2019 609-49754-434990 389.10 Check Sequence: 79 ACH Enabled: False 300.31 05/29/2019 101-43127-421990 300.31 Check Sequence: 80 ACH Enabled: True 200.00 05/29/2019 609-49750-425300 4.20 05/29/2019 609-49750-433300 204.20 Check Sequence: 81 ACH Enabled: False 205.10 05/29/2019 609-49750-425300 1.86 05/29/2019 609-49750-433300 206.96 Check Sequence: 82 ACH Enabled: True 4,252.25 05/29/2019 101-42100-430410 4,252.25 Check Sequence: 83 ACH Enabled: False 308.50 05/29/2019 229-45202-453011 308.50 Page 14 Invoice No Description Vendor: 5195 WRIGHT SERVICE CENTER 8820 Parts - 2007 Sterling- ck. codes; inst. (2) fuel fltr 8820 Labor- 2007 Sterling- ck.codes; inst. (2) fuel fltr: Check Total: Total for Check Run: Total of Number of Checks: Amount Payment Date Acct Number Check Sequence: 84 106.46 03/12/2019 101-43120-440500 288.00 03/12/2019 101-43120-440500 394.46 336,015.74 84 Reference ACH Enabled: False The preceding list of bills payable was reviewed and approved for payment. Date: 5/28/19 Approved by Mayor Brian Stumpf AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/22/2019 - 2:31 PM) Page 15 City Council Agenda 05/28/2019 2B. Consideration of approving new hires and departures for Citv departments (TE) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The Council is asked to ratify the hiring and departures of employees that have occurred recently in the departments listed. It is recommended that the Council officially ratify the hiring/departure of all listed employees including part-time and seasonal workers. By ratifying departures, the council also approves the expenditure for final amounts due to terminated and otherwise departing employees. Al. Budget Impact: (positions are generally included in budget) A2. Staff Work Load Impact: If new positions, there may be some training involved. If terminated positions, existing staff would pick up those hours, as needed, until replaced. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to ratify the hire/departures of the employees as identified on the attached list. 2. Motion to deny the recommended hires and departures. C. RECOMMENDATION: By statute the City Council has the authority to approve all hires/departures. City staff recommends Alternative #1, for the Council to approve the hires and/or departures as listed. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • List of new/terminated employees Name Breeanna Wolkerstorfer TERMINATING EMPLOYEES Reason Department Voluntary MCC New Hire and Terms City Council 2019: 5/20/2019 Class Last Day Class 4/4/19 PT NEW EMPLOYEES Name Title Department Hire Date Kazmer Beaudry Lifeguard MCC 5/9/19 PT Will Bofenkamp Lifeguard MCC 5/9/19 PT Paris Estes Slide Attendant MCC 5/15/19 PT Avery Vanderlinden Slide Attendant MCC 5/15/2019 PT Dylan Fyle Slide Attendant MCC 5/18/19 PT Name Breeanna Wolkerstorfer TERMINATING EMPLOYEES Reason Department Voluntary MCC New Hire and Terms City Council 2019: 5/20/2019 Class Last Day Class 4/4/19 PT City Council Agenda 05/28/2019 2C. Consideration of approving the sale or disposal of surplus Citv property (WO) There is no report this City Council cycle. City Council Agenda: 05/28/2019 2D. Consideration of approving Resolution 2019-37 accepting a $500 donation from CentraCare Health Monticello for Music on the Mississippi (JS) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The City Council is being asked to approve a donation of $500 from CentraCare Health Monticello for Music on the Mississippi. As required by state statute, if the city accepts a donation, the City Council needs to adopt a resolution specifying the amount of the donation and its use. Al. Budget Impact: The donations will be used toward the mentioned events. A2. Staff Workload Impact: Minimal. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the Resolution 2019-37 accepting the contribution and authorizing use of funds as specified. 2. Motion to not approve the contribution and return the funds to the donors. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommendation is to adopt the resolution accepting the contributions. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • Resolution 2019-37 1 CITY OF MONTICELLO RESOLUTION NO. 2019-37 RESOLUTION APPROVING CONTRIBUTIONS WHEREAS, the City of Monticello is generally authorized to accept contributions of real and personal property pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Sections 465.03 and 465.04 for the benefit of its citizens and is specifically authorized to maintain such property for the benefit of its citizens in accordance with the terms prescribed by the donor. Said gifts may be limited under provisions of MN Statutes Section 471.895. WHEREAS, the following persons and or entities have offered to contribute contributions or gifts to the City as listed: DONOR/ENTITY CentraCare Health Monticello DESCRIPTION VALUE Cash $500 WHEREAS, all said contributions are intended to aid the City in establishing facilities, operations or programs within the city's jurisdiction either alone or in cooperation with others, as allowed by law; and WHEREAS, the City Council hereby finds that it is appropriate to accept the contributions offered. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Monticello as follows: 1. The contributions described above are hereby accepted by the City of Monticello. 2. The contributions described above will be used as designated by the donor. This may entail reimbursing or allocating the money to another entity that will utilize the funds for the following stated purpose: DONOR/ENTITY CentraCare Health Monticello PURPOSE/AMOUNT Music on the Mississippi/$500 Adopted by the City Council of Monticello this 28th day of May, 2019. Brian Stumpf, Mayor Jennifer Schreiber, City Clerk City Council Agenda: 05/28/2019 2E. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2019-38 accepting donations of $4,670 for the Walk `n' Roll event (JS) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The Council is being asked to approve the donations for bike give away for the Walk `n' Roll event. As you know, Walk `n' Roll is a very popular event with approximately 1,200 people attending and people particularly love the bike give away. The sponsors for the Walk `n' Roll bikes included cash donations from the following to purchase bikes: • All 4 Kids (donated a bike) • Lucille Murray's Dance • Best Wester PLUS Chelsea Studio Hotel • Mains'l Services • Bliss Salon • Monticello Fire Relief • Celebrate Recovery @ Association Monticello Covenant Church • North Risk Partners • Center for Family Counseling • Polaris Chiropractic • CentraCare Health • Renewal by Andersen Monticello • Resurrection Lutheran • Cub Scouts Pack 274 Church • Culver's of Monticello • Riverside Church • Dan Olson State Farm • Riverwood Bank Insurance • Schlenner Wenner & Co, • Edina Realty — Realtors with CPA's Energy Team • Select Eyecare (donated a • Education Minnesota, bike) Monticello (EMM) • Sherburne State Bank • Faith Lutheran Church • Smith, Paulson, O'Donnell & • Fitness Evolution Erickson • Forever Young Two Medical • Stellis Health, PA • Great River Spine & Sport • The Cruz -Longley Team at • HealthSource Chiropractic of Edina Realty Buffalo • US Bank • Keller Williams West Metro • Von Hanson's Meats Erickson Group • Walmart Monticello • Kettle*Licious KettleCorn • Wells Fargo Bank Co. • WSB & Associates • Life and Liberty Real Estate As required by state statute, the City Council must adopt a resolution specifying the amount of the donation and its use. Al. Budget Impact: The donations will pay for expenses of the program. A2. Staff Workload Impact: Staff will do the work to put on this event. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to adopting Resolution 2019-38 accepting the contributions and authorize use of funds as specified. 1 City Council Agenda: 05/28/2019 2. Motion to deny the contribution and return the funds to the donors. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommendation is to adopt the resolution accepting the contributions. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • Resolution 2019-38 2 City of Monticello RESOLUTION NO. 2019-38 RESOLUTION APPROVING CONTRIBUTIONS FOR THE WALK `N' ROLL FESTIVAL WHEREAS, the City of Monticello is generally authorized to accept contributions of real and personal property pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Sections 465.03 and 465.04 for the benefit of its citizens and is specifically authorized to maintain such property for the benefit of its citizens in accordance with the terms prescribed by the donor. Said gifts may be limited under provisions of MN Statutes Section 471.895. WHEREAS, the following persons and or entities have offered to contribute contributions or gifts to the City as listed: DONOR/ENTITY DESCRIPTION VALUE All 4 Kids Bike NA Best Western PLUS Chelsea Hotel Cash $20 Bliss Salon Cash $150 Celebrate Recovery @ Monticello Covenant Cash $170 Church Center for Family Counseling Cash $150 CentraCare Health Monticello Cash $20 Cub Scouts Pack 274 Cash $20 Culver's of Monticello Cash $150 Dan Olson State Farm Insurance UL Cash $150 Edina Realty — Realtors with Energy Team Cash $20 Education Minnesota, Monticello (EMM) , Cash $170 Faith Lutheran Church �` Cash $150 Fitness Evolution Cash $150 Forever Young Two Medical Cash $150 Great River Spine & Sport Cash $150 Healthsource Chiropractic of Buffalo Cash $20 Keller Williams West Metro Erickson Group Cash $150 Kettle*Licious KettleCorn Co. Cash $20 Life and Liberty Real Estate Cash $20 Lucille Murray's Dance Studio Cash $20 Mains'l Services Cash $150 Monticello Fire Relief Association Cash $150 North Risk Partners Insurance Agency Cash $150 Polaris Chiropractic Cash $20 Renewal by Anderson Cash $150 Resurrection Lutheran Church Cash $20 Riverside Church Cash $170 RiverWood Bank Cash $170 Schlenner Wenner & Co, CPA's Cash $300 Select Eyecare Bike NA Sherburne State Bank Cash $170 Smith, Paulson, O'Donnell & Erickson Cash $150 Stellis Health, PA Cash $300 The Cruz -Longley Team at Edina Realty Cash $150 US Bank Cash $150 Von Hanson's Meats Cash $150 Walmart Gift Card $150 Wells Fargo Cash $170 WSB Cash $150 WHEREAS, all said contributions are intended to aid the City in establishing facilities, operations or programs within the city's jurisdiction either alone or in cooperation with others, as allowed by law; and WHEREAS, the City Council hereby finds that it is appropriate to accept the contributions offered. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Monticello as follows: 1. The contributions described above are hereby accepted by the City of Monticello. 2. The contributions described above will be used as designated by the donor. This may entail reimbursing or allocating the money to another entity that will utilize the funds for the following stated purpose: DONOR/ENTITY PURPOSE/AMOUNT All 4 Kids Bike/Walk `n' Roll Best Western PLUS Chelsea Hotel $20/Walk `n' Roll Bliss Salon $150/Walk `n' Roll Celebrate Recovery @ Monticello Covenant $170/Walk `n' Roll Church Center for Family Counseling $150/Walk `n' Roll CentraCare Health Monticello $20/Walk `n' Roll Cub Scouts Pack 274 $20/Walk `n' Roll Culver's of Monticello $150/Walk `n' Roll Dan Olson State Farm Insurance $150/Walk `n' Roll Edina Realty — Realtors with Energy Team �� $20/Walk `n' Roll Education Minnesota, Monticello (EMM) 1 ` $170/Walk `n' Roll Faith Lutheran Church $150/Walk `n' Roll Fitness Evolution $150/Walk `n' Roll Forever Young Two Medical _ $150/Walk `n' Roll Great River Spine & Sport $150/Walk `n' Roll HealthSource Chiropractic of Buffalo $20/Walk `n' Roll Keller Williams West Metro Erickson Group $150/Walk `n' Roll Kettle*Licious KettleCorn Co. $20/Walk `n' Roll Life and Liberty Real Estate $20/Walk `n' Roll Lucille Murray's Dance Studio $20/Walk `n' Roll Mains'l Services $150/Walk `n' Roll Monticello Fire Relief Association $150/Walk `n' Roll North Risk Partners Insurance Agenda $150/Walk `n' Roll Polaris Chiropractic $20/Walk `n' Roll Renewal by Andersen $150/Walk `n' Roll Resurrection Lutheran Church $20/Walk `n' Roll Riverside Church $170/Walk `n' Roll RiverWood Bank $170/Walk `n' Roll Schlenner Wenner & Co, CPA's $300/Walk `n' Roll Select Eyecare Bike/Walk `n' Roll Sherburne State Bank $170/Walk `n' Roll Smith, Paulson, O'Donnell & Erickson $150/Walk `n' Roll Stellis Health, PA $300/Walk `n' Roll The Cruz -Longley Team at Edina Realty $150/Walk `n' Roll US Bank $150/Walk `n' Roll Von Hanson's Meats $150/Walk `n' Roll Walmart $150 Gift Card/Walk `n' Roll Wells Fargo $170/Walk `n' Roll WSB $150/Walk `n' Roll Adopted by the City Council of Monticello this 28th day of May, 2018. Brian Stumpf, Mayor ATTEST: Jennifer Schreiber, City Clerk City Council Agenda: 05/28/2019 2F. Consideration of approving a Suecial Event Permit allowing exclusive use of West Bridge Park and related assistance in coniunction with the Brewfest event on August 17, 2019. Applicant: Monticello Lions Club (JS/PW) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The City Council is asked to consider approval of a special event permit for the Brewfest event, a craft beer -tasting fundraiser organized by the Monticello Lions Club. The request has several associated considerations: a) Approval for use of West Bridge Park from 7 a.m. — 10 p.m. (to accommodate set-up and tear -down) b) Approval of the use of city parking lots in the downtown area C) Approval for city staff assistance for preparation and set-up d) Closure of portions of W. River Street and Walnut Street e) Waiving of the special event fee and tent fee as requested by the Lions This adult-oriented community event is proposed to occur Saturday, August 17, from 3 to 7 p.m., and is being promoted and held in cooperation with eligible Minnesota craft brew vendors and local food vendors. Brewfest organizers are expecting 120 brew types at 45 tables, as well as local restaurant vendors, and an attendance of 1500 persons. Brewfest representatives have indicated that the set-up for the park will be very similar to last year's event. As a condition of approval, the Brewfest Committee will be asked to coordinate with the Parks Superintendent and Streets Superintendent on site planning and parking coordination. In addition, the committee is asked to coordinate with building staff on required tent permits. The event is proposed to be located in West Bridge Park. Event attendees would access the park from different locations nearby, with restricted points of entry into the event area in the park itself. The Brewfest Committee indicates in the attached application narrative that the event area within the park will be sectioned off with temporary fencing in order to restrict the point of entry to those over 21 years of age, as this event will be limited to only those persons over 21 holding an event ticket. The Lions Club will be responsible for placement of fencing around the park perimeter and for signage at the parking lots, with snow fence and posts provided by the city as is available. The Lions Club is being asked to provide advance notice of the event to surrounding homes and businesses within a 2 -block radius. The Brewfest Committee is seeking city assistance for providing barricades, cones, picnic tables, and set-up of those items. The committee will be asked to verify trash and portable restroom services for the event. The committee has requested use of the park from 7 a.m. — 10 p.m. to accommodate set-up, clean-up and tear -down by Lions Club members. As with the 2018 event, Public Works staff has proposed a plan to block off some streets in the area of West Bridge Park in order to control traffic flow into and out of the park vicinity. Any approval is contingent on coordination with the Streets Department and Wright County Sherriff's Office for final security, traffic control and street closures. City Council Agenda: 05/28/2019 The Monticello Lions Club is required to obtain insurance to cover the event and its activities, including liquor liability coverage, with the city named as second insured. The Lions Club is responsible for verifying that individual food and beverage vendors have the appropriate insurance coverage and state permits. The Lions Club is expected to provide security for the event through the Wright County Sheriff's Department. Al. Budget Impact: None. A2. Staff Workload Impact: The Lions Club is requesting city assistance for delivery and pick-up of barricades, cones, and picnic tables. These will be delivered to the site and picked up during regular staff hours by the Parks Department (estimated 16 hours). The Street Superintendent will also prepare and provide a site plan for barricade and cone placement. The Streets Department will be responsible for placing and removing all street barricades and signage (estimated 12 hours). B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the Special Event Permit allowing temporary use of West Bridge Park for the Monticello Lions Brewfest event from 7 a.m. to 10 p.m. on Saturday, August 17, 2019, including city assistance, use of municipal parking lots, street closures, and waiving of special event permit fee and tent fee. The approval is contingent on: a. continued site plan and parking use coordination with the Street Superintendent and Park Superintendent; b. appropriate signage and fencing in coordination with the Street and Park Superintendents; c. continued coordination with the Chief Building Official on any tent permits that may be needed; d. verification of trash and portable bathroom services for the event; and e. verification of notification of affected local businesses and residents within a 2 -block radius of the Park by permit holder, no later than two weeks prior to event; and event coordination with Wright County Sheriff's Office. 2. Motion to deny Special Event Permit for Brewfest event. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff supports Alternative 1. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Application & Narrative — Lions Club B. Certificate of Liability Insurance C. Aerial Image showing proposed street and parking lot closures 2 CITY OF MonficeRo Property Address CITY OF MONTICELLO Community Development 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1 Special Event Permit Monticello, MN 55362 (763) 295-2711 . infoaa,ci.monticello.mn.us Application Checklist Property Legal Description Property ID Number PROPERTY INFORMATION 107 West River Street West Bridge Park 155010065030 PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION Owner Name City of Monticello Owner Address 505 Walnut Street Owner Phone (763) 295-2711 Owner Email info@ci.monticello.mn.us APPLICANT INFORMATION _ Applicant Name Monticello Lions Club Applicant Address PO Box 673, Monticello, MN 55362 Applicant Phone Jacob T. Erickson (763) 295-2107 (work) (612) 417-7005 (cell) Applicant Email jacob.erickson@spoelawyers.com Name of Event Monticello Lion's Brewfest 2018 Location/Address of Event West Bridge Park, 107 West River Street, Monticello, MN 55362 Dates & Times of Event Saturday, August 17, 2019 lam to 10 pm (set up -event -take down) Complete Application Required The review and consideration of an application submitted shall only occur if such application includes all items that are required in support of the application and is deemed complete by the City Clerk's Office. Application Submission Schedule Application, required information, and payment must be submitted no later than 30 working days prior to desired approval date. Application Information Applicants shall note that in addition to a special event permits, any liquor license or permit, sign permits and building permits for tents may also be required and are not included within the special event permit application and approval. Any requested use of City facilities, City staff resources, City equipment, and/or City property (including rights of way) and/or any requested waiver of application fee or park rental fees requires review and approval by the City Council. In addition, events which occur after 10 PM may requires review and approval by the City Council as related to noise ordinances. Please provide clear information in the application regarding these requests. 05/03/2019 2019 Monticello Lion's Brewfest Application Page 1 of 10 Property Owner's Statement I am the fee title owner of the described property and I agree to this application. I certify that I am in compliance with all ordinance requirements and conditions regarding other City approval that have been previously granted. (Signature) Applicant's Statement (Date) This application shall be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding the application. I have completed all of the applicable filing requirements and I hereby acknowledge that I have read and fully understand the ap0cable provisions of the City Ordinances and current policies related to this application and that the doc ents and information I have submitted are true and correct. (Sig L0 T. Ed Monticello Lion's Club (Date) r l CITY APPROVAL (City Clerk Signature) (Date) (Community Development Director Signature) (Date) Special Event Permit Approved ❑ I Denied ❑ Approval is granted with the following conditions: Internal review checklist (as applicable): T Public Works Routing Admin Parks Streets Director Law Enforcement Notification Building Department Monticello Community Center Room/Park Reservations Post -Approval Routing/Requirements Applicant Public Works Law Enforcement Notification City Clerk Monticello Community Center Room/Park Reservations Liability Insurance Certificate Received Surrounding Property Owner Notification Complete 05/03/2019 2019 Monticello Lion's Brewfest Application Page 4 of 10 Monticello Lions — PO Box 673 — Monticello, M N 55362 �►�0 a� ��fRNAT10��` We Serve 1 May 2019 Staff and Council City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street Monticello, MN 55362 Greetings, The Monticello Lion's Club has a long tradition of serving the Monticello community, especially the humanitarian needs of our less fortunate residents, and having fun as we serve. We raise money for programs in a variety of ways and are currently planning an event that we need your help with in order for us to be successful. The event we are planning is the 2019 Monticello Lions Brewfest, a "Craft Beer Tasting Festival". We are expecting 120 plus beer "flavors" from craft brewers to be presented for tasting. We are planning to make it a celebration of not only craft beer from small brewers, but also a festival of music and food from local restaurants. Our participation goal for the 2019 Brewfest is 1500 attendees. The date of the festival is Saturday, August 17, 2019. The Lions Club's mission statement for this event is , "To establish and promote a signature craft beer tasting event for the purpose of raising revenue, in order to continue and expand the community service tradition of the Monticello Lions by using the funds raised for humanitarian purposes. The motto of the Monticello Lions and Lions everywhere being, 'We Serve"'. We are hoping to build on the success of the previous years festivals. Our goals are to increase the number of beer vendors, the number of beers to taste, the number of attendees, and the amount of net revenue, and to improve the experience for all in attendance at this highly anticipated community event. Judging by the response of all of the stakeholders including brewers, distributors, food vendors, attendees and the Lions, we are well on our way to achieving this goal. Three years ago the Lions were able to give more than $30,000.00 back to the community as a direct result of the Brewfest festival. Just a few of the beneficiaries of these funds include the Monticello Food Shelf, the Monticello Fire Department, 320 families and individuals that received food baskets for Christmas, and many other programs that serve the community, especially the less fortunate among us. The actual use of West Bridge Park will be to set up to 45 tables, some or all with small pop-up tents over them, for Craft Beer Brewers to display their craft beers for sampling. Festival attendees will be given a two ounce sampling glass to use to sample as many of the craft beers present as they wish to. In addition to the craft beer brewers there will be up to six local restaurants with tables and small tents selling their culinary specialties. We have also retained a band with a comfortable bluesy rock flavor to provide a pleasant musical background for the event. The event will take place rain or shine. We have had great days, weather wise, for the last seven year's events, and are hoping for another just like it this year. The tasting hours for this event will be from 3 — 7 PM. By Minnesota statute, a tasting festival can only run for four hours. We are requesting reservation of the park from 7:00 AM to 10:00 PM to accommodate set-up and tear -down / clean-up. At the end of the event Lions members will take down, pack up and remove all materials, structures, trash, etc. from the site. 05/03/2019 2019 Monticello Lion's Brewfest Application Page 8 of 10 To accomplish the goal of a successful, orderly and peaceful event, we request that the park be closed to all other uses for that day. We intend to place a fence around the perimeter of the space that we will be using. All Brewfest activities will take place within the fence. All persons inside the fence must be 21, must have purchased a Brewfest ticket, and be wearing a wristband that we will issue. The layout for this event will be the same as in last years. I have included a site plan. We are also asking the City of Monticello for the same cooperative efforts that they have provided the Monticello Lions in the past. This narrative is attached to the permit application. In the past years we have had extensive contact with City of Monticello employees that may be affected by this event, and communicated with them so as to set up in a manner that is acceptable to the City of Monticello. Several City of Monticello employees are also members of the Monticello Lions Club. The Monticello Lions club is comprised of members of our community. We strive to serve and make Monticello, Minnesota a greater city for all is residents and visitors. The proceeds from this event go back to the community, and I respectfully ask that the City wave any and all fees that it can to free up as much money as possible for the Lions to reinvest in the City of Monticello; a city on the River, the freeway, and the Grow! Thank you so much for your time and attention to this matter. The City has always been so supportive and helpful with this pre -community event, aOd I want you to know the Monticello Lions appreciate this. Sincerely, ions Brewfest Committee (763) 295-2107 05/03/2019 2019 Monticello Lion's Brewfest Application Page 9 of 10 Y rY Q W C7 CO F - Q w Y LU ❑ Of CO F- U) LL! E 05/03/2019 2019 Monticello Lion's Brewfest Application Page 10 of 10 ® DATE (MM/DD/YYYY) ACORO CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE I 05/01/2019 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). PRODUCER I CONTACT Nathan Lortz NAME: Christensen Group Insurance PHONE (952) 653-1000 F'O'X (952) 653-1100 (A/C No, Ext): (A/C, No): 9855 West 78th Street, Ste 100 I E-MAIL nlortz@christensengroup.com ADDRESS: DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS / VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached if more space is required) RE: Monticello Lions Brewfest - West Bridge Park Certificate Holder is included as an Additional Insured under the Commercial General Liability and Liquor Liability when required by written contract. CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN City of Monticello ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. 505 Walnut St AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE Monticello MN 55362 17�%� I ©1988-2015 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. ACORD 25 (2016/03) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD 05/03/2019 2019 Monticello Lion's Brewfest Application Page 7 of 10 INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC # Eden Prairie MN 55344 INSURERA: West Bend Insurance Cc 15350 INSURED INSURER B: Monticello Lions Club I INSURER C: PO Box 673 I INSURER D: INSURER E: Monticello MN 55362 I INSURER F: COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: 19/20 Liab Master REVISION NUMBER: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. INSR AUUL,Ut3K POLICY EFF POLICY EXP LTYPE OF INSURANCE TR INSD WVD POLICY NUMBER (MM/DD/YYYY) (MM/DD/YYYY) LIMITS X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE $ 1,000,000 � DAMAGE TO RENTED 100,000 CLAIMS -MADE OCCUR PREMISES (Ea occurrence) $ MED EXP (Any one person) $ EXCLUDED A A107246 01/01/2019 01/01/2020 PERSONAL&ADV INJURY $ 1,000,000 GEN'LAGGREGATE LIMITAPPLIES PER: GENERAL AGGREGATE $ 2,000,000 X POLICY PRO - JECT❑ PRO- ❑ LOC PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG $ 2,000,000 OTHER: $ AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT (Ea accident) $ ANY AUTO BODILY INJURY (Per person) $ OWNED SCHEDULED BODILY INJURY (Per accident) $ AUTOS ONLY AUTOS _ HIRED NON -OWNED PROPERTY DAMAGE $ AUTOS ONLY AUTOS ONLY (Per accident) OCCUR - UMBRELLA LIABHCLAIMS-MADE EACH OCCURRENCE $ EXCESS LIAB AGGREGATE $ DED I I RETENTION $ $ WORKERS COMPENSATION PER I I I ORH AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY Y / N STATUTE ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE E.L. EACH ACCIDENT $ OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? ❑N / A (Mandatory in NH) E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE $ If yes, describe under DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT $ Each Common Cause $1,000,000 LIQUOR LIABILITY A A107247 01/01/2019 01/01/2020 Aggregate $1,000,000 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS / VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached if more space is required) RE: Monticello Lions Brewfest - West Bridge Park Certificate Holder is included as an Additional Insured under the Commercial General Liability and Liquor Liability when required by written contract. CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN City of Monticello ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. 505 Walnut St AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE Monticello MN 55362 17�%� I ©1988-2015 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. ACORD 25 (2016/03) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD 05/03/2019 2019 Monticello Lion's Brewfest Application Page 7 of 10 City Council Agenda: 05/28/2019 2G. Consideration of approving an application for temporary on -sale liquor license for the Monticello Lions Club for their Brewfest event on August 17, 2019 (JS) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The Monticello Lions Club is requesting approval of an application for a 1 -day temporary on -sale liquor license on August 17, 2019 for their annual Brewfest event. The Lions Club will be setting up the event in West Bridge Park, located at 107 West River Street. The Lions Club has provided a certificate of insurance for this event and will be submitting an application for a special event permit for use of West Bridge Park in the coming months. City Council is required to approve temporary liquor applications prior to sending them to the State Alcohol and Gambling Division for approval. Al. Budget Impact: None A2. Staff Workload Impact: Minimal staff time to send application to State Alcohol and Gambling Division for approval. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the application for a temporary liquor license for the Monticello Lions Brewfest event on August 17, 2019 at West Bridge Park. 2. Do not approve the application for a temporary liquor license. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends Alternative #1 for approval of the application. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Application for temporary liquor license B. Certificate of Liability Insurance r 'A MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY Alcohol & Gambling Enforcement] Name of organization (Monticello Lions Address IPO Box 673 Name of person making application (Jacob Thomas Erickson Date(s) of event (August 17, 2019 Organization officer's name (Chad Vokaty Organization officer's name iMick Maher Organization officer's name Organization officer's name Minnesota Department of Public Safety Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division 445 Minnesota Street, Suite 222, St. Paul, MN 55101 651-201-7500 Fax 651-297-5259 TTY 651-282-6555 APPLICATION AND PERMIT FOR A 1 DAY TO 4 DAY TEMPORARY ON -SALE LIQUOR LICENSE Date organized Tax exempt number (October 1975 1 IQ -602 City State Zip Code Monticello I (MN 1155362 Business phone Home phone 1(763) 295-2107 1(612) 417-7005 Type of organization ® Club ® Charitable ® Religious ❑X Other non-profit City State Zip Code IBig Lake I IMN 155309 City State Zip Code I (Monticello I (Minnesota 155362 City State Zip Code II ININ 1i City State Zip Code Location where permit will be used. If an outdoor area, describe. West Bridge Park (an outdoor park area), 107 West River Street, Monticello, MN 55362 If the applicant will contract for intoxicating liquor service give the name and address of the liquor license providing the service. If the applicant will carry liquor liability insurance please provide the carrier's name and amount of coverage. Chrsistensen Group - $1,000,000 Each occurance, $2,000,000 Aggregate. APPROVAL APPLICATION MUST BE APPROVED BY CITY OR COUNTY BEFORE SUBMITTING TO ALCOHOL AND GAMBLING ENFORCEMENT City or County approving the license Fee Amount Date Fee Paid Date Approved Permit Date City or County E-mail Address City or County Phone Number Signature City Clerk or County Official Approved Director Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement CLERKS NOTICE: Submit this form to Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division 30 days prior to event. ONE SUBMISSION PER EMAIL, APPLICATION ONLY. PLEASE PROVIDE A VALID E-MAIL ADDRESS FOR THE CITY/COUNTY AS ALL TEMPORARY PERMIT APPROVALS WILL BE SENT BACK VIA EMAIL. E-MAIL THE APPLICATION SIGNED BY CITY/COUNTY TO AGE.TEMPORARYAPPLICATIONC&STATE.MN.US 05/03/2019 2019 Monticello Lion's Brewfest Application Page 6 of 10 ® DATE (MM/DD/YYYY) ACORO CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE lllk.� 11/21/2018 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT. If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). PRODUCER CONTACT Customer Care Center NAME: West Bend Mutual Insurance Company IPAH((O'NI o. Extt: (866) 926-4244 I FAX, No): (262) 365-2200 1900 South 18th Avenue E-MAIL customercare@wbmi.com ADDRESS: West Bend WI 53095 INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC # INSURER A: West Bend Mutual Insurance Company 15350 INSURED INSURER B Monticello Lions Club INSURER C PO Box 673 INSURER D: INSURER E : Monticello MN 55362 INSURER F: COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: 19/20 Master REVISION NUMBER: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. INSR TYPE OF INSURANCE AOUL SUISK POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFF POLICY EXP LIMITS LTR INSD WVD (MMIDD/YYYY) (MMIDD/YYYY) COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE $ 1,000,000 CAMAGF-RENTED CLAIMS -MADE a OCCUR PREM SESO(Ea occurrence) $ 100,000 UMBRELLA LIABHCLAIMS-MADE OCCUR EXCESSLIAR DED I I RETENTION $ WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY YIN ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNERIEXECUTIVE D N I A OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? (Mandatory In NH) If yes, describe under DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below A Liquor Liability A107246 Y A107247 MED EXP (Any one person) $ Excluded 01/01/2019 01/01/2020 PERSONAL & ADV INJURY GEN'LAGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: $ 2,000,000 POLICY1:1 PRO- JECT LOC OTHER: COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY (Ea accident) ANY AUTO $ BODILY INJURY (Per accident) OWNED SCHEDULED _ AUTOS ONLY AUTOS HIRED_ NON -OWNED _ AUTOS ONLY AUTOS ONLY UMBRELLA LIABHCLAIMS-MADE OCCUR EXCESSLIAR DED I I RETENTION $ WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY YIN ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNERIEXECUTIVE D N I A OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? (Mandatory In NH) If yes, describe under DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below A Liquor Liability A107246 Y A107247 MED EXP (Any one person) $ Excluded 01/01/2019 01/01/2020 PERSONAL & ADV INJURY $ 1,000,000 GENERAL AGGREGATE $ 2,000,000 PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG $ 2,000,000 COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT $ (Ea accident) BODILY INJURY (Per person) $ BODILY INJURY (Per accident) $ PROPERTY DAMAGE $ (Per accident) EACH OCCURRENCE $ AGGREGATE $ PER STATUTE I I EERH E.L. EACH ACCIDENT $ E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE $ E L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT $ Aggregate 1,000,000 01/01/2019 01/01/2020 Each Common Cause 1,000,000 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS I LOCATIONS I VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached it more space is required) City of Monticello is recognized as an Additional Insured with regard to Liquor Liability coverage per form NS0280 attached to this policy and with regard to the General Liability when required by written contract per form W61890. CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN City of Monticello ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. 505 Walnut St AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE Monticello MN 55362-8821 1 ©1988-2015 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. ACORD 25 (2016103) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD City Council Agenda: 05/28/2019 211. Consideration of approving a Special Event Permit for Church of St. Henrv's Fun Fest being held on August 24-25, 2019 QS) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The City Council is asked to consider approving the Special Event Permit for Fun Fest event hosted by Church of St. Henry, including the use of 12 tables to be provided by the Parks Departments. Parks staff delivers the tables on Friday and picks them up on Monday. A narrative has been provided by the applicant. Al. Budget Impact: Minimal. A2. Staff Workload Impact: Parks Department staff time to deliver and retrieve the tables. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the special event permit including use of tables as provided by the Park Department. 2. Motion to deny the special event permit. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff supports Alternative #1 above. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Application & Narrative 1 Cllr 0F Monticello CITY OF MONTICELLO Community Development 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1 Monticello, MN 55362 (763) 295-2711 . info[&,ci.monticello.mn.us I Property Address Property Legal Description Property ID Number I Owner Name Owner Address Owner Phone Owner Email Applicant Name Applicant Address C Applicant Phone Applicant Email Name of Event Location/Address of Event Dates & Times of Event PROPERTY INFORMATION 1001 E 7th St, Monticello, MN 55362 PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION Church of Saint Henry 1001 E 7th St, Monticello, MN 55362 763-295-2402 ddupay@sthenrycatholic.com APPLICANT INFORMATION Special Event Permit Application Checklist Dan Dupay 1001 E 7th St, Monticello, MN 55362 763-271-3072 ddupay@sthenrycatholic.com Fun Fest (annual parish festival) 1001 E 7th St, Monticello, MN 55362 Aug 24th, 2019 (5-9pm) & Aug 25th (11am-4pm) Complete Application Required The review and consideration of an application submitted shall only occur if such application includes all items that are required in support of the application and is deemed complete by the City Clerk's Office. Application Submission Schedule Application, required information, and payment must be submitted no later than 30 working days prior to desired approval date. Application Information Applicants shall note that in addition to a special event permits, any liquor license or permit, sign permits and building permits for tents may also be required and are not included within the special event permit application and approval. Any requested use of City facilities, City staff resources, City equipment, and/or City property (including rights of way) and/or any requested waiver of application fee or park rental fees requires review and approval by the City Council. In addition, events which occur after 10 PM may requires review and approval by the City Council as related to noise ordinances. Please provide clear information in the application regarding these requests. 07/25/16 1 APPLICANT APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS CHECK A written narrative including: 1. A description of the proposed special event, how it will function on the property, hours and dates of operation, and any other information necessary to fully describe the request; and 2. An explanation of how the proposed special event will meet each of the review criteria specified by code (on reverse), as well as any additional criteria that may apply for the specific use. 3. Any requested use of City facilities, City staff resources, City equipment and City property (including rights of way) and/or any requested waiver of application fee or park rental fees requires review and approval by the City Council A site plan showing all information necessary to accurately depict how the proposed use will function on the site. Information required on the site plan shall include but not be limited to: 1. The location of all existing and proposed structures; 2. Driveways and parking areas; 3. Proposed storage spaces; 4. Natural features such as woodlands, wetlands, shorelines, etc; 5. Proposed number of parking spaces (if applicable). If deemed necessary by the Community Development Department, a survey may be required to be submitted with the application in addition to a site plan. Certificate of insurance/liability coverage. Electronic copies of all written narratives and plan sets required above. Application fee of $50.00. Special Event Review Process CITY CHECK-IN • The City Clerk will review all Temporary Use Permit applications. • Applications determined to conform with the approval criteria outlined in Monticello Zoning Code Section 2.4(L)(4)(a) and listed below shall be approved by the Community Development Department with any conditions deemed necessary. A copy of the approved permit shall be provided to the applicant which includes all conditions and comments. • Applications not conforming with the approval criteria outlined in Section 2.4(L)(4)(a) shall be denied by the Community Development Department. • A notice of denial shall be provided to the applicant which includes all identified reasons for denial. Special Event Temporary Use Permit Approval Criteria Approval of a Temporary Use Permit shall only be granted once the City Clerk has determined the use shall: • Not be detrimental to property or improvements in the surrounding area or to the public health, safety, or general welfare; • Be compatible with the principal uses taking place on the site; Not have substantial adverse effects or noise impacts on nearby residential neighborhoods; 07/25/16 Special Event Temporary Use Permit Approval Criteria, cont. • Not include permanent alterations to the site; • Not maintain temporary signs associated with the use or structure after the activity ends; • Not violate the applicable conditions of approval that apply to a site or use on the site; • Not interfere with the normal operations of any permanent use located on the property; and • Contain sufficient land area to allow the temporary use, structure, or special event to occur, as well as adequate land to accommodate the parking and traffic movement associated with the temporary use, without disturbing environmentally sensitive lands. • Not create an unreasonable risk of significant: 1. Damage to public or private property, beyond normal wear and tear; 2. Injury to persons; 3. Public or private disturbances or nuisances; 4. Unsafe impediments or distractions to, or congestion of, vehicular or pedestrian travel; 5. Additional and impracticable or unduly burdensome police, fire, trash removal, maintenance, or other public services demands; and 6. Other adverse effects upon the public health, safety, or welfare. The special event shall not be of such a nature, size, or duration that the particular location requested cannot reasonably accommodate the event. The special event shall not conflict with another permitted special event at the same location in a manner that will negatively impact the public health, welfare, or safety. Special Event Temporary Use Permit Conditions of Approval In approving the Temporary Use Permit for the special event, the City Clerk's Office is authorized to impose such conditions upon the issuance of the permit as may be necessary to reduce or minimize any potential adverse impacts upon other property in the area, as long as the condition relates to a situation created or aggravated by the proposed special event. The Community Development Department is authorized, where appropriate, to require: 1. Provision of temporary parking facilities, including vehicular access and egress. 2. Control of nuisance factors, such as but not limited to, the prevention of glare or direct illumination of adjacent properties, noise, vibrations, smoke, dust, dirt, odors, gases, and heat. 3. Regulation of temporary buildings, structures and facilities, including placement, height and size, location of equipment and open spaces, including buffer areas and other yards. 4. Provision of sanitary and medical facilities. 5. Provision of solid waste collection and disposal. 6. Provision of security and safety measures. 7. Use of an alternative location or date for the proposed special event. 8. Modification or elimination of certain proposed activities. 9. Regulation of operating hours and days, including limitation of the duration of the special event to a shorter time period than that requested or specified in this subsection. 10. Submission of a performance guarantee to ensure that any temporary facilities or structures used for such proposed special event will be removed from the site within a reasonable time following the event and that the property will be restored to its former condition. Duration of Permit A temporary use permit for a special event authorized in accordance with this subsection shall be limited to a maximum duration of 14 days per site per calendar year, unless otherwise specifically authorized by the City Clerk. 07/25/16 3 Property Owner's Statement I am the fee title owner of the described property and I agree to this application. I certify that I am in compliance with all ordinance requirements and conditions regarding other City approval that have been previously granted. (Signature) (Date) I Applicant's Statement This application shall be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding the application. I have completed all of the applicable filing requirements and I hereby acknowledge that I have read and fully understand the applicable provisions of the City Ordinances and current policies related to this application and that the documents and information I have submitted are true and correct. (Signature) , f D CITY APPROVAL (City Clerk Signature) (Community Development Director Signature) Special Event Permit Approval is granted with the following conditions: Internal review checklist (as applicable): Public Works Routing Law Enforcement Notification Building Department Monticello Community Center Room/Park Reservations Post -Approval Routing/Requirements Applicant I Public Works Law Enforcement Notification City Clerk Monticello Community Center Room/Park Reservations Liability Insurance Certificate Received Surrounding Property Owner Notification Complete (Date) '? (Date) (Date) Approved ❑ Admin Denied ❑ _I Parks �treets I Director 07/25/16 4 St. Henrys is requesting the Parks Department provide 12 picnic tables to use for the event City Council Agenda 05/28/2019 2I. Consideration of approving applications for a 2-dav temporary liquor license and a charitable gambling permit for the Church of St Henrv's fall festival on August 24- 25,2019(JS) 4- 25,2019(JS) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The Church of St Henry is requesting approval of an application for a 2 -day temporary on -sale liquor license and a charitable gambling permit in conjunction with their annual Fall Festival event on August 24-25, 2019. The activities will take place on the church parking lot and grounds. The State grants approval for the liquor license following City approval. To receive a permit from the State, the City must also approve the gambling permit application. In the past the City has not opposed these exempt gambling license applications for charitable events. Al. Budget Impact: NA A2. Staff Workload Impact: Minimal staff time to process application with State Alcohol and Gambling Division for approval. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the applications for a temporary 2 -day liquor license pending receipt of certificate of insurance showing liquor liability coverage and the charitable gambling permit for the Church of St Henry's Fall Festival to be held on church grounds on August 24-25, 2019. 2. Motion to deny the applications for temporary liquor license and charitable gambling permit. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends Alternative #1 for approval of the applications. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Application for temporary liquor license B. Charitable gambling permit r Ad AM MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF PUEIUCSAFETY Alcohol t Enforcement Name of organization CHURCH OF SAINT HENRY Address 1001 EAST 7TH ST Name of person making application IDAN DUPAY Date(s) of event (AUGUST 24TH & 25TH 2019 Organization officer's name REV. ANTHONY G. VANDERLOOP Organization officer's name Organization officer's name Organization officer's name Minnesota Department of Public Safety Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division 445 Minnesota Street, Suite 222, St. Paul, MN 55101 651-201-7500 Fax 651-297-5259 TTY 651-282-6555 APPLICATION AND PERMIT FOR A 1 DAY TO 4 DAY TEMPORARY ON -SALE LIQUOR LICENSE Location where permit will be used. If an outdoor area, describe. PARKING LOT, 1001 EAST 7TH ST, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 Date organized Tax exempt number 19/16/1909 118507537 City State Zip Code (MONTICELLO I iMinnesota IISS362 Business phone Home phone 1763-271-3072 I 1 Type of organization 17 Microdistillery Small Brewer F7 Club E] Charitable 0 Religious F Other non-profit City State Zip Code IMONTICELLO I (Minnesota I IS5362 City State Zip Code II (Minnesota City State Zip Code I I (Minnesota I City State Zip Code (Minnesota If the applicant will contract for intoxicating liquor service give the name and address of the liquor license providing the service. N/A If the applicant will carry liquor liability insurance please provide the carrier's name and amount of coverage. - -SE-LF-INSURE-D-T-HROUGH-THE-ARC-HDIOCES OF -SAINT PAUL-& MINNEAP-OLIS,-ADMINISTRATED-BY-CAT-HOL-IC-MUTUAL--R€TEF-SONEW----- OF AMERICA, LIQUOR LIABILITY OF $500,000. APPROVAL APPLICATION MUST BE APPROVED BY CITY OR COUNTY BEFORE SUBMITTING TO ALCOHOL AND GAMBLING ENFORCEMENT City or County approving the license Fee Amount Date Fee Paid Date Approved Permit Date City or County E-mail Address City or County Phone Number Signature City Clerk or County Official Approved Director Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement CLERKS NOTICE: Submit this form to Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division 30 days prior to event. ONE SUBMISSION PER EMAIL, APPLICATION ONLY. PLEASE PROVIDE A VALID E-MAIL ADDRESS FOR THE CITY/COUNTY AS ALL TEMPORARY PERMIT APPROVALS WILL BE SENT BACK VIA EMAIL. E-MAIL THE APPLICATION SIGNED BY CITY/COUNTY TO AGE.TEMPORARYAPPLICATION@STATE.MN.US MINNESOTA LAWFUL GAMBLING LG220 Application for Exempt Permit An exempt permit may be issued to a nonprofit organization that: conducts lawful gambling on five or fewer days, and awards less than $50,000 in prizes during a calendar year. If total raffle prize value for the calendar year will be $1,500 or less, contact the Licensing Specialist assigned to your county by calling 651-539-1900. ORGANIZATION INFORMATION Organization Name: CHURCH OF ST. HENRY, MONTICELLO Minnesota Tax ID Number, if any: 8507537 Mailing Address: 1001 E 7TH ST 11/17 Page 1 of 2 Application Fee (non-refundable) Applications are processed in the order received. If the application is postmarked or received 30 days or more before the event, the application fee is $100; otherwise the fee is $150. Due to the high volume of exempt applications, payment of additional fees prior to 30 days before your event will not expedite service, nor are telephone requests for expedited service accepted. Previous Gambling Permit Number: X-86019-19-012 Federal Employer ID Number (FEIN), if any: 41-0764106 City: MONTICELLO State: MN Zip: 55362 County: WRIGHT Name of Chief Executive Officer (CEO): ANTHONY G. VANDERLOOP CEO Daytime Phone: 763-295-2402 CEO Email: frtonyvanderloop@sthenrycatholic.com (permit will be emailed to this email address unless otherwise indicated below) Email permit to (if other than the CEO): ddupay@sthenrycatholic.com NONPROFIT STATUS Type of Nonprofit Organization (check one): = Fraternal 0 Religious Veterans Other Nonprofit Organization Attach a copy of one of the following showing proof of nonprofit status: (DO NOT attach a sales tax exempt status or federal employer ID number, as they are not proof of nonprofit status.) ❑✓ A current calendar year Certificate of Good Standing Don't have a copy? Obtain this certificate from: MN Secretary of State, Business Services Division Secretary of State website, phone numbers: 60 Empire Drive, Suite 100 www.sos.state.mn.us St. Paul, MN 55103 651-296-2803, or toll free 1-877-551-6767 IRS income tax exemption (501(c)) letter in your organization's name F-1 Don't have a copy? To obtain a copy of your federal income tax exempt letter, have an organization officer contact the IRS toll free at 1-877-829-5500. F-1 IRS - Affiliate of national, statewide, or international parent nonprofit organization (charter) If your organization falls under a parent organization, attach copies of both of the following: 1. IRS letter showing your parent organization is a nonprofit 501(c) organization with a group ruling; and 2. the charter or letter from your parent organization recognizing your organization as a subordinate. GAMBLING PREMISES INFORMATION Name of premises where the gambling event will be conducted (for raffles, list the site where the drawing will take place): CHURCH OF ST HENRY PARKING LOT Physical Address (do not use P.O. box): 1001 E 7TH ST Check one: M City: MONTICELLO Zip: 55362 County: WRIGHT ❑ Township: Zip: County: Date(s) of activity (for raffles, indicate the date of the drawing): AUGUST 24TH & 25TH 2019 Check each type of gambling activity that your organization will conduct: 0 Bingo E-1 Paddlewheels a Pull -Tabs = Tipboards Raffle Gambling equipment for bingo paper, bingo boards, raffle boards, paddlewheels, pull -tabs, and tipboards must be obtained from a distributor licensed by the Minnesota Gambling Control Board. EXCEPTION: Bingo hard cards and bingo ball selection devices may be borrowed from another organization authorized to conduct bingo. To find a licensed distributor, go to www.mn.gov/gcb and click on Distributors under the List of Licensees tab, or call 651-539-1900. LG220 Application for Exempt Permit 11/17 Page 2 of 2 LOCAL UNIT OF GOVERNMENT ACKNOWLEDGMENT (required before submitting application to the Minnesota Gambling Control Board) CITY APPROVAL for a gambling premises located within city limits The application is acknowledged with no waiting period. The application is acknowledged with a 30 -day waiting period, and allows the Board to issue a permit after 30 days (60 days for a 1st class city). FIThe application is denied. Print City Name: Signature of City Personnel: Title: Date: The city or county must sign before submitting application to the Gambling Control Board. COUNTY APPROVAL for a gambling premises located in a township he application is acknowledged with no waiting period. he application is acknowledged with a 30 -day waiting period, and allows the Board to issue a permit after 30 days. Dhe application is denied. Print County Name: Signature of County Personnel: Title: Date: TOWNSHIP (if required by the county) On behalf of the township, I acknowledge that the organization is applying for exempted gambling activity within the township limits. (A township has no statutory authority to approve or deny an application, per Minn. Statutes, section 349.213.) Print Township Name: Signature of Township Officer: Title: CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S SIGNATURE (required) Date: The information provided in this application is complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge. I acknowledge that the financial report will be completed and returned to the Board within 30 days of the event date. Chief Executive Officer's Signature: (Signature must be CEO's signature; designee may not sign) Print Name: Anthony G. VanderLoop Date: REQUIREMENTS MAIL APPLICATION AND ATTACHMENTS Complete a separate application for: • all gambling conducted on two or more consecutive days; or • all gambling conducted on one day. Only one application is required if one or more raffle drawings are conducted on the same day. Financial report to be completed within 30 days after the gambling activity is done: A financial report form will be mailed with your permit. Complete and return the financial report form to the Gambling Control Board. Your organization must keep all exempt records and reports for 3-1/2 years (Minn. Statutes, section 349.166, subd. 2(f)). Data privacy notice: The information requested on this form (and any attachments) will be used by the Gambling Control Board (Board) to determine your organization's qualifications to be involved in lawful gambling activities in Minnesota. Your organization has the right to refuse to supply the information; however, if your organization refuses to supply this information, the Board may not be able to determine your organization's qualifications and, as a consequence, may refuse to issue a permit. If your organization supplies the information requested, the Board will be able to process the Mail application with: a copy of your proof of nonprofit status; and application fee (non-refundable). If the application is postmarked or received 30 days or more before the event, the application fee is $100; otherwise the fee is $150. Make check payable to State of Minnesota. To: Minnesota Gambling Control Board 1711 West County Road B. Suite 300 South Roseville, MN 55113 Questions? Call the Licensing Section of the Gambling Control Board at 651-539-1900. application. Your organization's name and address will be public information when received by the Board. All other information provided will be private data about your organization until the Board issues the permit. When the Board issues the permit, all information provided will become public. If the Board does not issue a permit, all information provided remains private, with the exception of your organization's name and address which will remain public. Private data about your organization are available to Board members, Board staff whose work requires access to the information; Minnesota's Depart- ment of Public Safety; Attorney General; Commissioners of Administration, Minnesota Management & Budget, and Revenue; Legislative Auditor, national and international gambling regulatory agencies; anyone pursuant to court order; other individuals and agencies specifically authorized by state or federal law to have access to the information; individuals and agencies for which law or legal order authorizes a new use or sharing of information after this notice was given; and anyone with your written consent. This form will be made available in alternative format (i.e. large print, braille) upon request. An equal opportunity employer City Council Agenda: 05/28/2019 2J. Consideration of authorizing staff to work with Wright Countv to establish a second election precinct (JS) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: City Council is asked to authorize staff to pursue a second election precinct. Wright County has asked cities requesting an additional precinct notify them by June 1 to accommodate ordering new election equipment. It is necessary to split the existing precinct into two because Monticello's registered voter count is now greater than 7,200 voters. The Secretary of State recommends 2,000-2,500 voters per precinct. Technically because the city is not split by a county, congressional or legislative district, the city is not required to have more than one precinct. However, the voting process at this one location is no longer practical, and a precinct of this size is vulnerable to mistakes and complications at the close of polls. The current polling location is the gymnasium of the Monticello Community Center. While the gym works well for smaller elections, there are problems using this facility for larger elections — such as next year's presidential election. The entrance and exit are in the same area creating a backlog of people and confusion for voters. In addition, there are three entrances into the community center which adds to the confusion. With Council's approval, staff will work with Wright County to review the city for an additional precinct site. It is likely the precincts will be divided by I-94 or by Highway 25. We will count eligible voters in each area to recommend a site. We need to make this determination before October 1, and Council will be asked to adopt the new precinct by resolution. In 2018 the city approved a maintenance agreement with Wright County for new election equipment. Wright County is purchasing, storing, and maintaining the equipment and cities are paying a $100 maintenance fee per machine per year. The contract stipulates a city may not create a new precinct of more than 2,000 voters. Our new precinct will exceed this threshold, but the county agreed to allow Monticello to disregard this stipulation. This is primarily because the number of machines we are allowed per registered voter will not change. They recommend we increase the number of precincts. Al. Budget Impact: There will be a cost to notify the public of the new precinct. The cost is approximately $0.30 per registered voter. There may be a need to hire a small number of additional judges for 2020; however, our current number should work as we won't need as many at each site. A2. Staff Workload Impact: Extensive staff time will be spent processing the second precinct including establishing the second precinct location, educating the public, and staffing and training judges. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to authorize staff to proceed with planning for a second precinct. 2. Motion to deny. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City Council Agenda: 05/28/2019 City staff recommends Alternative 1. D. SUPPORTING DATA • None. City Council Agenda: 05/28/2019 2K. Consideration of authorizing Classification and Compensation Studv and awarding contract to Kevstone Compensation Group. (JO,TE) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Council is asked to authorize a Classification and Compensation Study and award contract to Keystone Compensation Group. Staff is recommending the study be conducted at this time to 1) Address increased pay compression within our current system limiting promotional opportunities, and 2) Ensure our pay levels are competitive with the market. The scope of the study will include a review of our current system with recommended system modifications, a review of current job descriptions to ensure proper grade assignment, and a market study of comparable cities to ensure we are paying competitively based on the market. A report will be provided to council at the end of the study with recommendations moving forward. The last study was completed in 2007 and implemented in 2008. The City received nine (9) proposals to complete the study ranging from $6,000-$57,000. City staff interviewed two (2) consultants and based on those interviews recommends Keystone Consulting Group with a not to exceed amount of $12,200 (second lowest proposal). Saado Abboud, who would lead the study, is well known in the HR community and received positive recommendations from the cities of Hutchinson, Prior Lake, Shakopee and St. Louis Park. Abboud's area of expertise is municipal pay systems and staff is comfortable that he understands the scope of the project and will be able to meet our deadline for completion. Al. Budget Impact: The study is a budgeted item for 2019 and the proposal is within the amount budgeted. A2. Staff Workload Impact: The study will require regular meetings between the consultant and Project Team (to be identified) throughout the process to review progress and provide feedback on results. With assistance from the consultant, the Human Resources Manager will also be responsible for internal communications with staff. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to authorize Classification and Compensation Study and award contract to Keystone Compensation group for a not to exceed amount of $12,200. 2. Motion to deny authorization of Classification and Compensation Study and awarding of contract at this time. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative #1. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • Classification and Compensation Proposal- Keystone Compensation Group PROPOSAL CLASSIFICATION AND COMPENSATION STUDY FOR THE CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA CITY OF Monticello 5/10/2019 Prepared by: Keystone Compensation Group LLC 3316 Ensign Ave N Minneapolis MN 55427 Telephone: 612-810-3522 E -Mail: Sabboud0kevstonecomp.net Web: www.kevstonecomn.net KEYSTONE COMPENSATION GROUP.,: 1,,.,.a business and ....,a .......... Classification and Compensation Study TABLE OF CONTENTS Tonic Background and Objectives Project Summary and Deliverables Framework for Conducting this Compensation and Classification Study Steps for Completing This Study Project Team and Related Experience Project Budget Summary and Estimated Timeline --- Client Data Confidentiality Business Description of Keystone Compensation Group LLC --------- Project Approval Page # M 10 Biographies of Project Team ---------- ---------- ----------- 11 Classification and Compensation Study BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES The City of Monticello (City) is requesting a proposal from Keystone Compensation Group LLC for providing compensation consulting services. These services include reviewing the current job classification system, evaluating jobs using the current job evaluation system or an alternative one, conducting a competitive market analysis, and preparing recommendations for updating the City's compensation program. City leadership would like to ensure internal equity compliance and that its pay program is competitive with comparable cities in the marketplace. In addition, develop recommendations for addressing pay compression issues. The City has approximately 53 full-time and 146 part-time employees in about 57 job classifications. Fourteen (14) Public Works Maintenance Workers are unionized. The City uses a performance-based step pay program to administer compensation and the Modified Princeton Evaluation System to evaluate and slot jobs into grades. The current compensation system has 25 grades and eight steps within each grade. The compensation program is currently in compliance with the State Pay Equity requirements. This proposal outlines our understanding of the scope of this study, steps we would take to meet its objectives, approximate timeline, and an estimate of the financial budget to complete the work. PROJECT SUMMARY AND DELIVERABLES 1. Conduct an initial meeting with the City leadership team to review objectives of this program review and discuss feedback to be considered during this study. 2. Review the current job evaluation system and determine if it serves its purpose of accurately evaluating jobs for internal equity. Determine if a replacement is necessary. 3. Evaluate City jobs using the Modified Princeton System, or an alternative system based on leadership guidance. 4. Collect market data from a select peer group of comparable cities. 5. Conduct comparisons of internal pay with the market and summarize findings. 6. Calibrate the current salary ranges with the market and confirm internal equity. Ensuring compliance with State Pay Equity is key to this step. 7. Prepare recommendations for revising the current wage structure based on internal job evaluation results and market analysis. 8. Prepare an estimate for the budget impact of the recommended wage structure on payroll budget and individual pay. This analysis is used to create a transition plan. 9. Prepare a summary report documenting steps, processes, and analyses results. 10. Throughout the project create opportunities for leadership involvement as deemed necessary by the project team. R, Classification and Compensation Study STEPS FOR COMPLETING THIS STUDY The lead consultant would start this project with a planning meeting with the HR staff and City Leadership. Keystone proposes the following steps for completing this study: 1. INITIAL PLANNING MEETING a. Review current pay practices and confirm deliverables from this study. This includes gathering current compensation program information and discussing important feedback on the current system and ways to address it. b. Discuss methodology for selecting peer group cities and collecting market data. This discussion will include establishing the criteria for selecting other cities with which to compare City wages (proximity, population size, type of services provided, and talent source). c. Discuss and confirm pay structure design, including number of grades and steps, and alignment with the market. 2. HIGH-LEVEL OVERVIEW OF JOB DESCRIPTIONS a. In our conference call with the City HR Manager we learned that job descriptions are current. We also reviewed a sample of these job descriptions. b. During the step of evaluating jobs we would keep some notes for to help with refining job descriptions and discuss them with the HR Manager. c. job descriptions would be used to evaluate jobs and assign them to grades. 3. EVALUATE CITY JOBS a. Keystone Consultants have significant depth and understanding of the principles used in designing and implementing job evaluation systems. b. We received and reviewed the documentation for the Modified Princeton System for job evaluation. We are confident with our ability to evaluate jobs using this system. We also studied points spread and weightings of the factors used to grade jobs. We will provide our assessment to the City Leadership which would assist with making the decision to continue with the current system or transition to another system. c. Keystone has a point factor job evaluation system with more refined compensable factors definition. This system takes into consideration the complexity of performing job functions and the interpersonal communication skills needed to perform the job. Keystone does not recommend changing the evaluation system unless there is a compelling reason to do so. d. Evaluate City jobs and review results with the City project team. e. The final job evaluations, combined with market data, are used to update the wage structure and confirm job grades. Classification and Compensation Study 4. COLLECT MARKET COMPENSATION DATA FROM THE LEAGUE OF MN CITIES SURVEY a. Keystone would work with the City leadership to develop and confirm a peer group to use for the market analysis. We would collaborate with the City to ensure valid market representation and establish the basis for selecting the peer group. b. Consultant collects market data from the LMC survey. We would review the data and may call participants to get clarifications on matches as needed. Eight to ten cities would be considered as sufficient sample size. The City of Monticello participated in this survey and matched 33 jobs in 2019. c. We conducted some preliminary research to determine how many potential peer group cities have submitted their data to the LMC Survey in 2019. 5. PREPARE COMPARISONS WITH THE MARKET AND CALIBRATE SALARY RANGES a. Use market data and job evaluation points to analyze the current ranges and compare them with the market. b. Prepare scatterplots and trend lines for various compensation data to illustrate the City's pay position relative to the market This step helps identify any anomalies or potential issues with internal equity compliance (State Pay Equity Act). c. Use market data and updated job grades to calculate and recommend new wage ranges. d. Take a close look at pay compression and recommend ways to address it. e. Prepare a summary of findings and review with City team. 6. PROVIDE AN ESTIMATE FOR THE BUDGET IMPACT TO IMPLEMENT THE REVISED RANGES a. Assign employees to their new pay steps and evaluate wages change. b. Identify areas where salary actions maybe needed and provide recommendations. c. Create an overall summary of the budget impact for transition to the new ranges. d. We understand that for budgeting purposes, City would like study completed by late August 2019. 7. PREPARE THE FINAL REPORT The consultant would prepare a summary report that includes study methodology, benchmark analysis results, specific observations, and recommendations. All information would be provided to City HR electronically. 8. ONGOING CITY SUPPORT We approach this study as a business partner invested in the success of this program. Our goal is to ensure knowledge transfer from the consultant to City staff and to help the City sustain the program internally going forward. We would be available to support the City after project completion and to answer questions. Simple and short inquiries are answered at no additional cost, while more substantial work would be quoted separately. Classification and Compensation Study PROJECT TEAM AND RELATED EXPERIENCE This project would be led by Dr. Saado Y. Abboud and act as the first contact for the City. Stefan Peterson, a Sr. Consultant with Keystone, assists with job description review and provide benchmarking and analytical support to this project Among the specific experience that Saado has related to public sector compensation and this study: 1. Consulted with many counties and cities in Minnesota. Clients include the City of St. Louis Park, City of Prior Lake, City of Shakopee, Scott County, Dakota County, Anoka County, Carlton County, McLeod County, Cook County, Crow Wing County, City of Apple Valley, City of Chanhassen, City of Rochester, City of Hutchinson, and others. 2. Extensive experience with developing and implementing compensation programs in various industries including government, non-profit, and private sectors. 3. Currently manages an annual compensation survey with 14 major counties and large cities in Minnesota covering over 170 jobs. Counties and cities like Hennepin County, Ramsey County, Dakota County, Anoka County, St Louis County, Olmsted County, Carver County, Scott County, Sherburne County, Stearns County, City of Rochester, City of Bloomington, and other agencies participate in this annual market study. 4. Managed the annual market survey for Minnesota metro cities and counties for over 12 years (Stanton Group Metro Survey). This survey is currently part of the League of MN Cities Survey. S. Saado also authored several articles for the WorldatWork Journal including one on performance-based compensation program implemented at Scott County. He received Author of the Year Award for writing this publication. 6. Many years of experience as a corporate compensation manager, professional consultant, and Board leadership of several professional compensation associations. Classification and Compensation Study PROJECT BUDGET SUMMARY AND ESTIMATED TIMELINE Budget Estimate for the City of Monticello Compensation Program Review (5-10-2019) Step Description Tentative Step Owner Timeline Budget Notes Initial planning, information City & Onsite meeting with City 1 collection, project strategy, Weeks 1-2 Keystone leadership to finalize plan and and timeline approval steps P High level review of job 2 descriptions and provide Weeks 3-4 Keystone $4,300 City has 57 job classifications sueeestions, if needed Evaluate jobs using current Job Evaluation System Review of current system and 3 (Modified Princeton Job Weeks 5-8 Keystone propose modifications or use Evaluation Svtem) an alternative system 4 Benchmark jobs using LMC I Weeks Keystone Usetrendlines/scattergrams survey to help explain findings Compensation analysis, S update structure, compliance Weeks 10-12 Keystone $5,600 Suggest practical implications check, recommendations 6 Program costing Week 13 Keystone transition � �plan, Assign employees to new steps and budget analysis Y and estimate transition impact 7 Meet with City leadership Week 1S City & I (Onsite Meeting team to discuss results Keystone 8 Prepare final project Varies Keystone $2,300 Electronic copies of work summa and documentation ti' documents delivered to HR 9 Follow up and final check-in I Varies city & As needed Keystone Timeline may vary depending Weeks 1- 15 I I $12,200 on availability of information to Keystone Notes - Keystone would invoice the City in three installments based on project milestones reached: a. After completing job evaluation b. After completing market analysis c. At project completion - The estimate in this proposal is a not -to -exceed amount and is based on project scope. - Timeline is a placeholder for steps. Upon accepting proposal, consultant would prepare a project plan with more precise timeline and desired completion date. Classification and Compensation Study CLIENT DATA CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT Keystone treats information and materials we obtain from our clients during our engagement as confidential information. We would not share it with a third party except as directed by our clients or as required by law. Furthermore, we do not disclose information obtained from our clients with the public media or press. Keystone expects our clients to maintain strict control over all proprietary systems obtained from us and to limit disclosure to others, who need to know, within their entities according to Minnesota Statute - 13.435 (types of data not considered public). BUSINESS DESCRIPTION OF KEYSTONE COMPENSATION GROUP LLC Keystone Compensation Group LLC is a professional consulting firm specialized in market research, design, development, and implementation of compensation programs. While we place significant emphasis on market research and on building compensation programs, we also appreciate the importance of supporting our clients with managing and communicating these programs. With an average experience of more than 25 years in the field, our consultants have acquired significant knowledge and expertise in various industries and organizations. We devote significant time upfront to better understand the challenges facing our clients. In addition, we view compensation budget as a strategic investment that organizations make in their employees. Our role is to help clients manage this investment to better attract, motivate, and retain qualified talent and improve their business outcomes. Classification and Compensation Study PROJECT APPROVAL This proposal is prepared based on our understanding of the scope of the services requested and phone conversations with the City HR Manager. Additional work outside of the scope may be priced separately upon request from the City. We can start this study within two weeks of receiving approval for this proposal and upon receiving the information needed to get started. We are privileged to be considered for this project and look forward to the opportunity to work with you on this important study! If you have any questions, please call Saado Abboud at: 612.810.3522 or email him at: sabboud0kevstonecomu.net. If you approve this proposal, please sign below and return a copy of this page to: Saado Abboud at: sabboud0kevstonecomo.net City Authorized Signature: Approved by Title Date Classification and Compensation Study Saado Y. Abboud, Ph.D. Keystone Compensation Group, Principal Consultant 3316 Ensign Ave North Minneapolis MN 55427 Tel: 612.810.3522 Sabboud@keystonecomp.net www.kevstonecomD.net Saado is a founding partner of Keystone Compensation Group LLC with over twenty-five years of experience in the field of compensation. His experience involves all phases of compensation program development, strategy, design and management. His clients include organizations in private, public sector, and nonprofit. He consults with top executives and board of directors on executive compensation design and management. His combined experience in managing compensation programs within a Fortune 100 company and as a professional consultant gives him a balanced view while working with his clients. Most recently Saado served as Vice President, Compensation Practice for Stanton Group, a regional consulting and survey research firm in Minneapolis. He worked closely with business and HR leaders as well as Boards of Directors to develop rewards programs for executives, middle management, and other employees. Saado's compensation experience includes developing base pay, short-term and long-term incentive programs to attract and motivate employees. He also helps his clients with communicating reward programs. Prior to joining Stanton Group, Saado spent several years in a senior leadership position at Best Buy Co. with responsibilities over corporate compensation programs as well as executive compensation. Among his other accomplishments was taking a key role in restructuring the HR function and leading several technology initiatives to support business growth. He contributed articles and interviews to several trade publications, including Workspan, a monthly journal for total rewards professionals, Minnesota Bankers News and the Twin Cities Business Journal. Early in his career, Saado taught at the college and graduate school levels, domestically and abroad. He has a doctorate and master's degrees from the University of Minnesota in Quantitative Analysis. He also received his MBA degree in Corporate Finance from the University of St. Thomas. Saado is a certified compensation professional (CCP), a member of WorldatWork, and Chairman of the Local Network Advisory Board for WorldatWork. Saado also served for several years on the Twin Cities Compensation Network Board of Directors. Classification and Compensation Study Stefan K. Peterson, CCP Keystone Compensation Group, LLC Principal Consultant 3316 Ensign Ave North ' Minneapolis MN 55427 Tel: 952.270.1114 �7 Speterson@keystonecomp.net www.kevstonecomo.net Stefan is a Senior Compensation Consultant at Keystone Compensation Group LLC with over thirty years of experience in the field of compensation. His experience involves managing compensation, benefits, and human resources systems. His compensation and benefits career included organizations in the healthcare, retail, technology, and manufacturing industries. His experience in managing compensation and benefits programs within Fortune 100 companies and midsize organizations uniquely qualifies him to solve diverse client challenges. Most recently Stefan served as Sr. Director of Compensation and Benefits at Fairview Health Services, a premier healthcare organization in Minneapolis. He had responsibility over a team charged with the redesigning of compensation and benefits programs as well as the implementation of new human resources and payroll systems. He also provided executive compensation consulting services and developed HR Committee meeting materials. Stefan's compensation experience includes developing base pay, short-term, and long-term incentive programs to attract and motivate employees. Prior to joining Fairview Health Services, Stefan held several senior leadership positions at Nash Finch Company, Pearson Inc., National Computer Systems, BMC Industries, Alliant Techsystems and Honeywell Inc. In all these organizations he had broad responsibilities over base pay programs, job evaluation, and executive compensation. Stefan has a master's degree from Gonzaga University in Human Resources Management and a bachelor's degree in Political Science from University of North Dakota. He has been a faculty member at the Metropolitan State University for over twenty years teaching compensation and benefits classes. He is a Certified Compensation Professional (CCP) and a Senior Professional in Human Resources (SPHR). Stefan is a member of WorldatWork and the Twin Cities Compensation Network (TCCN). He also served on the Twin Cities Compensation Network Board of Directors. City Council Agenda — 05/28/2019 2L. Consideration to approve Ordinance No. 721 and Summary Ordinance No. 721A for publication for amendments to the Monticello Zoning Ordinance as related to Self - Storage uses, Ordinance No. 722, an amendment to the Spaeth Industrial Park Planned Unit Development District, and development contract for the Spaeth Industrial Park Planned Unit Development. Applicant: Ken Spaeth. (NAC) Property: Legal: Lot 2, Block 3, Oakwood Industrial Park Address: 108 Dundas Road Planning Case Number: 2019-007 A. REFERENCE & BACKGROUND Request(s): Amendment to an approved PUD District to accommodate industrial self -storage including development agreement, and related amendments to definitions and uses in the Monticello Zoning Ordinance. Deadline for Decision: Land Use Designation Zoning Designation Overlays/Environmental Regulations Applicable: Current Site Use: Surrounding Land Uses: North: East: South: West: April 29, 2019, deadline for agency action extended to June 28, 2019 Places to Work PUD, Spaeth Industrial Park PUD District The purpose of the Spaeth Industrial Park PUD District is to provide for the development of certain real estate subject to the District for industrial land uses. NA Vacant Industrial Industrial Medium Density Residential Industrial Project Description: The applicant received approval for an Industrial PUD in 2017. The PUD project incorporates a series of individual 6,976 square foot industrial buildings, each of which can be subdivided into 3 separate 2,325 square foot bays. The applicant seeks amendments to permit these bays to be used by individuals for "self -storage" City Council Agenda — 05/28/2019 or private use, rather than restricted to industrial uses otherwise permitted in the district and the area. This action would include creating definitions and threshold requirements for "Commercial Self -Storage" and "Industrial Self -Storage", and allocating each to specific locations. Finally, as a part of this amendment, the applicant also seeks the following clarifications to the original PUD: • Consideration of any final signage requests; • Increasing building height from 16 feet to a proposed 18 feet; • Providing for flexibility in internal (rear) door size and location; and • Phasing as it relates to pavement improvements. ANALYSIS As noted, the applicant wishes to accommodate use and ownership of the individual bays for personal storage or hobby use, in addition to the industrial uses of the site otherwise allowed in the district. In Monticello's zoning ordinance, "Self -Storage" is a use allowed by Conditional Use Permit in the B-3, Highway Business District, and as a permitted use in the I-1, Light Industrial District. General Warehousing is a Conditional Use in the B-3 and IBC (Industrial Business Campus) Districts, and Permitted in the I-1 and I-2 (Heavy Industrial) Districts. General Warehousing is defined as follows: GENERAL WAREHOUSING: Structures used for the storage or distribution of goods where there is no sale of items to retailers or the general public unless permitted as an accessory use to the warehouse The zoning ordinance does not have a definition of "Self -Storage". In Monticello, and the surrounding region, "Self -Storage" businesses are characterized by buildings that have a variety of sizes of storage units in larger buildings, which rent to any user by the month. Sizes of units typically range as small as 50 square feet to 400 square feet — there are a few locations that have a limited supply of space up to 1,000 square feet in area. Warehousing, in contrast, is characterized by larger facilities that nearly always have separate dock or overhead door access, and typically are long-term uses of property, rather than short term rentals. To accommodate the applicant's request, and avoid mixing smaller high -traffic self - storage with industrial uses, staff is suggesting that definitions be added to the zoning ordinance that distinguishes "Commercial Self -Storage" from "Industrial Self - K City Council Agenda — 05/28/2019 Storage", and allocate each use to the appropriate zones or land use districts (since most of these facilities are developed through PUD zoning). The ordinances as described below are reflective of the Planning Commission and Industrial and Economic Development Committee comment regarding the application request and proposed amendments for self -storage uses. 1. Ordinance No. 721 relating to Self -Storage uses proposes the following: a. Amends the zoning ordinance to create definitions for both commercial and industrial self -storage uses. These definitions do not currently exist within the code. A definition for "Commercial Self -Storage" is recommended regardless of the outcome on the applicant request and other amendments. b. Amends the zoning ordinance to allow "Industrial Self -Storage" by CUP in the I-1 and I-2 Districts, with a definition proposed as follows: INDUSTRIAL SELF -STORAGE: A land use characterized by larger spaces available to occupants for the purposes of storage of commercial, industrial, or personal goods, as well as business, industrial, or hobby activities accessory to such storage as permitted within the zoning district, provided that no such space is subdivided to a total area that is less than 2,000 square feet in area. For Industrial Self -Storage, the use standards proposed include a restriction that each separate space be required to have its own overhead door and separate service door as a way of ensuring that the space is not further subdivided to sizes below the "industrial" threshold. That is, common overhead door access between occupants will not be permitted. It should be noted that when proposed to include multiple principle use storage buildings on a single parcel, a project will require authorization through PUD. Amends the ordinance to provide a definition for Commercial Self - Storage (to distinguish the use from Industrial Self -Storage). The proposed definition is as follows: COMMERCIAL SELF -STORAGE: A land use characterized by a variety of sized spaces available to the general public for rent on short-term periods, and for which size of individual spaces are less than 1,000 square feet in area. Commercial Self -Storage facilities are limited to storage use only, with no separate business activities permitted as part of the use. "Commercial Self -Storage" is proposed to be limited to the B-3 Zoning District. The performance standards for Commercial Self -Storage are not proposed to change in content, but would be relocated to the Commercial section of the ordinance. 2. Ordinance No. 722 is an amendment specific to the Spaeth Industrial Park, allowing Industrial Self -Storage as a principal use within the PUD by -right. This 3 City Council Agenda — 05/28/2019 allowance would require compliance with the definition for Industrial Self - Storage as proposed above. IEDC AND PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION April Action The Planning Commission tabled action and continued the public hearing on this item during its regular April meeting. During the public hearing and review of the request in April, the Planning Commission heard testimony which identified concern regarding the proposed definition for Industrial Self -Storage. Mr. Keith Burnham, property owner of Affordable Storage at 10111 Innsbrook Drive, expressed concern regarding the 1,000 square feet size requirement. He suggested the Commission consider increasing the size requirement to avoid conflict with commercial self -storage uses. In addition, he noted concern with the ability to enforce the lease length provision suggested in the ordinance. In the Planning Commission's discussion, Commissioners recognized that this type of use, with accompanying accessory uses (such as classic car storage with minor auto repair uses) has arisen as a changing trend or condition in land use. They noted having seen this type of use occurring in other communities. However, Commissioners noted some concern over the potential use of industrial land for smaller commercial storage uses, noting the importance the creation of tax base and employment in industrial areas. After discussion, the Planning Commission tabled action and continued the public hearing, recommending that the Industrial and Economic Development Committee review the issue and provide a recommendation. May Action Staff gathered additional information on similar types of facilities in other communities, including Chanhassen and Medina. In summary, both communities have permitted such uses in their industrial or business districts (similar to Monticello's IBC district), either by right or through PUD. It should be noted that the facilities in these communities, and others, appear to be at a much larger scale. In many cases these storage units include accessory uses, such as office space, minor auto repair and guest or lounge areas. Given the Commission's April comments, staff revised their recommendation and ordinances as noted above and presented the proposed ordinance regarding self - storage to the IEDC and both the proposed ordinance for self -storage and the Spaeth PUD ordinance to the Planning Commission. The IEDC met the morning of Tuesday, May 7th to discuss the proposed ordinance amendment for self -storage uses. After discussion, the IEDC unanimously recommended approval of the proposed ordinance amendment regulating self -storage uses. A verbal report on the IEDC's recommendation was provided at the May Planning Commission meeting. L! City Council Agenda — 05/28/2019 Following the continued public hearing on the item in May, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the proposed ordinance amendments and the PUD amendment unanimously. No additional public testimony was offered on the requests during the hearing. The Commission cited the IEDC's recommendation and the revised ordinance language as the basis for their recommendation. OTHER ITEMS: In discussing the application with the applicant, the following items are noted as additional clarifications to the previously approved Planned Unit Development. Sianaae. The applicant is considering the potential for locating a freestanding sign on the property to identify occupants of the PUD, particularly as some do not have direct exposure to the public street. The applicant will be working on a proposed sign plan to present with the updated site plan as a part of this review. No PUD flexibility is being sought at this time and the applicant is expected to comply with all required sign ordinance provisions as part of the PUD. Building Height. The original PUD Plans anticipated a 16 foot building height. The applicant would like to amend that to 18 feet. This amendment is not expected to impact any aspects of the PUD, and would be effective for all buildings in the project. Rear Door Placement. The applicant is proposing to clarify that internal access doors (particularly rear -side overhead doors for individual units) are likely to shift in size and location, depending on the needs of the specific occupants. For such internal doors, no amendments will be required to accommodate this flexibility. However, overhead doors affecting the proposed parking configuration and count would require additional PUD amendment review. Phasing. The phasing plan presented and approved for the PUD indicates that the project will be constructed in phases as building sites are sold and/or proposed by buyers. The applicant will construct the plat with utilities and the ring -road curb and pavement, filling in paved and curbed areas between buildings as building construction proceeds. As a further point of clarification, the applicant will need to work with City staff to maintain drainage and erosion control, as well as paved access and parking for constructed buildings. Paving beyond the internal lot lines of individual buildings may be required to maintain access and drainage, within the limits of the approved PUD site plan. Development Agreement. The development contract approved in 2017 for the Spaeth Industrial Park Plat and PUD has not been recorded, as the plat has not yet been recorded. As such, the development agreement has been revised to incorporate the proposed amendment to the PUD. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS Decision 1: Ordinance Amendments and Amendment to PUD The Planning Commission recommends Alternative #1. 1. Motion to adopt Ordinance No. 721 for amendments to the Zoning Ordinance establishing "Commercial" and "Industrial" Self -Storage land uses, to adopt 5 City Council Agenda — 05/28/2019 Ordinance No. 722 for approval of the PUD District Ordinance Amendment for the Spaeth Industrial Park PUD District, and the Development Agreement for the Spaeth Industrial Park PUD, based on findings in Resolution No. PC -2019-011. 2. Motion to deny adoption of Resolution No. PC -2019-011, based on findings to be stated by the City Council. 3. Motion to table action on the ordinances and development agreement, pending additional information from applicant or staff. Decision 2: Summary Ordinances 1. Motion to adopt Summary Ordinance 721A for publication. 2. Motion to deny adoption of Summary Ordinance 721A. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the amendments to the Zoning Ordinance and the Spaeth Industrial Park PUD District as revised. The uses proposed by the applicant should integrate well in the industrial areas of the City, without introducing undue public activity in those locations. By separating "Commercial" and "Industrial" self - storage, the ordinance would acknowledge the differences between the attributes of these two distinct uses and provide a usable definition and use allowances for application of the code. With the amendment to the code, it is reasonable to incorporate the new "Industrial Self -Storage" use into the Spaeth PUD District, which is intended for storage and small-scale industrial business use. D. SUPPORTING DATA A. Resolution PC -2019-011 B. Ordinance No. 721 & Summary Ordinance 721A for Ordinance Amendments C. Ordinance No. 722 for Spaeth Industrial PUD D. Aerial Site Image E. Applicant Narrative F. Approved Spaeth Industrial Park Plans, excerpts including: a. Project Location Plan b. Grading & Drainage Plan c. Site Plan d. Phasing Plan e. Building Elevations f. Floor Plan G. Research Link: htti)://www.automotorplex.com/ H. Development Agreement, Spaeth Industrial Park PUD Z. Conditions of Approval C City Council Agenda — 05/28/2019 EXHIBIT Z Conditions of Approval Spaeth Industrial Park — PUD Amendment I. The PUD will comply with the proposed definition and performance standards for Industrial Self -Storage uses. 2. The applicant will need to work with City staff to maintain drainage and erosion control, as well as paved access and parking for constructed buildings. Paving beyond the internal lot lines of individual buildings may be required to maintain access and drainage, within the limits of the approved PUD site plan. 3. The applicant will prepare a sign plan and updated site plan compliant with the City Sign Ordinance as a part of final stage PUD review for the proposed amendment. 4. Applicant execute an amendment to the Development Agreement for the plat and PUD reflecting the terms and conditions of any approval of the proposed amendment. VA CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2019-011 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AMENDMENTS TO THE MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE AFFECTING THE DEFINITIONS AND USES, THE SUBJECT ZONING DISTRICT, DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, PERMITTED USES, SITE PLAN, BUILDING PLANS, AND PHASING FOR SPAETH INDUSTRIAL PARK PUD WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted a request to divide its property along Dundas Road, PID No. 155018003020 into eight parcels; and WHEREAS, the applicant received original approvals for such subdivision and a PUD request; and WHEREAS, the applicant is seeking amendments to the PUD related to use, building height, signage, phasing, and door placement; and WHEREAS, the applicant concurrently proposes to develop the property for industrial uses; and WHEREAS, the site is guided for industrial uses under the label "Places to Work" in the City's Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the proposed PUD, along with the companion Plat, are consistent with the long-term use and development of the property for industrial uses; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on April 2, 2019 and May 7t', 2019 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: 1. The PUD provides an appropriate means of furthering the intent of the Comprehensive Plan for the site by putting the existing and proposed buildings to industrial use. 2. The proposed improvements on the site under the PUD are consistent with the needs of the PUD in this location as an industrial area. 3. The improvements will have expected impacts on public services, including sewer, water, stormwater treatment, and traffic which have been planned to serve the property for the development as proposed. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2019-011 4.. The PUD flexibility for the project, including parcels without public street frontage, are consistent with the intent of the City's economic development objectives, as well as with the intent of the PUD zoning regulations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, that the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the Monticello City Council approves Ordinance No. 6XX, including the Zoning Ordinance Amendments, Zoning District Amendments and PUD Development Agreement Amendments as noted in the Staff Report for May 7, 2019 and subject to the following conditions: 1. The PUD will comply with the proposed definition and performance standards for Industrial Self -Storage uses. 2. The applicant will need to work with City staff to maintain drainage and erosion control, as well as paved access and parking for constructed buildings. Paving beyond the internal lot lines of individual buildings may be required to maintain access and drainage, within the limits of the approved PUD site plan. 3. The applicant will prepare a sign plan and updated site plan compliant with the City Sign Ordinance as a part of final stage PUD review for the proposed amendment. 4. Applicant execute an amendment to the Development Agreement for the plat and PUD reflecting the terms and conditions of any approval of the proposed amendment. ADOPTED this 70' day of May, 2019, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMIS Br e, Chair G ATTEST: nity Dev lopment Director Angela Schui.4"C m�mu 2 ORDINANCE NO. 721 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 10 OF THE MONTICELLO ZONING CODE, CHAPTER 5, TABLE 5-1 RELATING TO GENERAL WAREHOUSING AND SELF STORAGE USES; SECTION 5.2 (G) (13), RELATING TO THE PROVISION FOR "COMMERCIAL SELF STORAGE, AND 5.2 (G)(17) RELATING TO "INDUSTRIAL SELF STORAGE"; AND SECTION 8.4, DEFINITIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA HEREBY ORDAINS: Section 1. Chapter 5, Table 5-1 is hereby amended as follows: "General Warehousing" is hereby deleted as a use in the B-3, Highway Business District. Section 2. Chapter 5, Table 5-1 is hereby amended to add the following: Section 3. Chapter 5, Table 5-1 is hereby amended as follows: Re -label "Self -Storage" as "Industrial Self Storage" and list as an allowable use in the I-1 and I-2 Districts by Conditional Use Permit, subject to the requirements referenced in Section 5.2(G)(17), and deleting as a Conditional Use in the B-3 District. Section 4. Chapter 5, Section 2(G)(17), Regulations for Industrial Uses, Self -Storage, is renumbered as Chapter 5, Section 2(F)(10). Section 5. Chapter 5, Section 2(G), Regulations for Industrial Uses, is hereby amended to add the following: Section 5.2(G) (13) Industrial Self Storage. (1) Such Facilities shall occupy no less than 2,000 square feet per individual storage unit in any complex or building. (2) All individual units shall have overhead door access and service access separate from other units, and no common access shall be permitted. (3) Such use shall be authorized by Conditional Use Permit. Section 6. Chapter 8.4, Definitions is hereby amended to add the following: COMMERCIAL SELF -STORAGE: A land use characterized by a variety of sized spaces available to the general public for rent on short-term periods, and for which size of individual spaces are less than 1,000 square feet in area. Commercial Self -Storage facilities are limited to storage use only, with no separate business activities permitted as part of the use. INDUSTRIAL SELF -STORAGE: A land use characterized by larger spaces available to occupants for the purposes of storage of commercial, industrial, or personal goods, as well as business, industrial, or hobby activities accessory to such storage as may be permitted within the zoning district, provided that no such space is subdivided to a total area that is less than 2,000 square feet in area. Section 7. The City Clerk is hereby directed to make the changes required by this Ordinance as part of the Official Monticello City Code, Title 10, Zoning Ordinance, and to renumber the tables and chapters accordingly as necessary to provide the intended effect of this Ordinance. The City Clerk is further directed to make necessary corrections to any internal citations and diagrams that result from such amendments, provided that such changes retain the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance as has been adopted. Section 8. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage and publication. Revisions will be made online after adoption by Council. Copies of the complete Zoning Ordinance are available online and at Monticello City Hall. ADOPTED BYthe Monticello City Council this 28th day of May, 2019. CITY OF MONTICELLO Brian Stumpf, Mayor ATTEST: Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator VOTING IN FAVOR: VOTING IN OPPOSITION: SUMMARY ORDINANCE NO. 721A CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA A SUMMARY ORDINANCE AMENDING CITY OF MONTICELLO ZONING CODE, CHAPTER 5, TABLE 5-1 RELATING TO GENERAL WAREHOUSING AND SELF STORAGE USES; SECTION 5.2 (G)(13), RELATING TO THE PROVISION FOR "COMMERCIAL SELF STORAGE", AND 5.2 (G)(17) RELATING TO "INDUSTRIAL SELF STORAGE"; AND SECTION 8.4, DEFINITIONS NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, on May 28, 2019, Ordinance No. 721 was adopted by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. Due to the lengthy nature of Ordinance No. 721, the following Summary Ordinance No. 721A has been prepared for publication as authorized by state law. The ordinance adopted by the Council amends Title 10 of the Monticello Zoning Code. The general purpose of the ordinance amendments relate to both commercial and industrial self - storage uses, and related land use in chapters and sections with changes to the following: Table 5.1: Use By District Table 5.2 (G)(17): Regulations for Industrial Uses, Self -Storage 5.2 (G): Regulations for Industrial TTses 8.4: Definitions A printed copy of the whole ordinance is available for inspection by any person during the City's regular office hours. The complete ordinance will be posted on the City's website following publication. APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION by the City Council of Monticello, Minnesota, this 28th day of May, 2019. CITY OF MONTICELLO Brian Stumpf, Mayor ATTEST: Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator VOTING IN FAVOR: VOTING IN OPPOSITION: ORDINANCE NO. 722 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 10 OF THE MONTICELLO CITY CODE, KNOWN AS THE ZONING ORDINANCE, BY AMENDING SECTION 2.4(0), THE "SPAETH INDUSTRIAL PARK PUD", A ZONING DISTRICT IN THE CITY OF MONTICELLO, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO HEREBY ORDAINS: Section 1. Section 2.4(0) (a) — Planned Unit Developments, Title 10 — Zoning Ordinance is hereby amended to read as follows: (a) Permitted Uses. Permitted principal uses in the Spaeth Industrial Park PUD District shall be i. Indoor industrial uses as found in the I-2, Heavy Industrial District of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance, subject to the approved Final Stage Development Plans dated , and development agreement dated , 2017, as may be amended. ii. The introduction of any other use from any district, including Conditional Uses in the I-2 District, shall be reviewed under the requirements of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 2, Section (0) — Planned Unit Developments for Development Stage PUD and Final Stage PUD. iii. Industrial Self -Storage, as defined by the Monticello Zoning Ordinance_ Section 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to make the changes required by this Ordinance as part of the Official Monticello City Code, Title 10, Zoning Ordinance, and to renumber the tables and chapters accordingly as necessary to provide the intended effect of this Ordinance. The City Clerk is further directed to make necessary corrections to any internal citations that result from said renumbering process, provided that such changes retain the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance as has been adopted. Section 3. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage and publication. The ordinance in its entirety and map shall be posted on the City website after publication. Copies of the complete Ordinance and map are available online and at Monticello City Hall for examination upon request. ORDINANCE NO. 722 ADOPTED BY the Monticello City Council this 281h day of May, 2019. Brian Stumpf, Mayor ATTEST: Jeff O'Neill, Administrator AYES: NAYS: Spaeth, Ken -Request for Amendment to Planned Unit Development Created by: City of Monticello Lot 2, Block 3 Oakwood Industrial Park I PI D#155-018-0030201 108 Dundas Road Ken Spaeth Masonry 108 Meadowlark Rd. Se. St. Michael, Mn. 56557 612-889-3100 2-25-19 City of Monticello Community Development Att: Angela In regards to the Spaeth Industrial Park I'm sending you a request to add self storage to the PUD. The buildings I'm building are 6976 sq. ft. and are to be subdivided into 3 -units with 2325 sq ft. each. In asking for the amendment I would restrict subdividing the units any smaller with covenants approved by the city. The intent for the park is still for small business but adding additional uses of storage/man cave. We'd still abide by the no outside storage. Sincerely, Ken Spaeth 4�a KITTS -ON ROSEAU LAKE OF HE WOODS MARSHALL KOOCHICHING BELTRAMI PENNINGTON RED LAKE COOK [fi LAKE POLK ITASCA ST. LOUIS NORMAN (OMEN 7. LASS CLAY BECKER AITKIN �y GROW CARLTON OTTER TAIL :* WING PINE TODD MLLE GRAN T "OLIGLAS MOR Ri SON a ENTON {' POPE Bla'� STEARNS TONE URNS I9ANTI 1 SWIFT 'rte ANo �O � W RI G LAC HIPPE4hfA 4a'$RAMSEY QUIHENNE- PARLE ILT N WASHINGTON — , -1.1RENVILLE a 111R SOLIth Haven SQUthsidef Ineh1Laka Twp M— 44 - , ) CokatO Twp AL L IF --5tc Twrp SI®LEY LYON REDWOOD ICOLLET LE GOOl3HUE DEUR RIDE WABASHA BROWN �I HURRAY GWOOD - X11 ANN' EARTH °i� �fff� Oa0 OLMSTED O WINO NOBLES �r0 � MARTIN 1*000 -l' I POO MOWER FILLMORI, MINNESOTA Clearwater wparwazer Iwp Silver Creek Twp or nna Twp i, Maple Lake TwF Mapl e, Lake Albivii Twp Ichatham,WiTw6g:bLIA Midclleville Twp M.arysville Twp -Ve 111w ..,) fvlontrose HDvia rd; La ke Waverly —Victor,Twv Waodland�Twis I M1r�r�tic�ll�, Ta�r��:• f Al LN 13Dffialo Twp pro,St. Michael' I _ Han T� minklifivTwp, WRIGHT COUNTY SITE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT i5 � 64 00030, 4 c c' nrAnnn''In S MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA or ..4 `� ■�IfN1■I�w�MiM - SC H+ I 107 INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: CO PROJECT LOCATION PLAN C1 SITE PLAN C2 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN C3 SANITARY AND WATER UTILITY PLAN C4 STORM SEWER UTILITY PLAN C5 LANDSCAPE PLAN C6 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C7 EXISTING CONDITIONS AND REMOVALS PLAN C8 DETAILS C9 PHASING PLAN �4 W J � N 'o cC co CL o to I— z a; z w � �w �o �O oMUM CD ?a oc FAM UU Wy Q z (DCL zo � J U ct CL z 0 N 0 C) m o 0 LL, 0 Q o a v v FILE NO. 00640 co Proiect Location Plan I I REGRADE DITCH; COORDINATE h O�^� WITH VENDOR UTILITY �h� RE -GRADE DITCH; DAYLIGHT PROVIDERS FOR RELOCATION )( DITCH FLOWLINE TO DRAIN; RCADOF UTILITIES \ COORDINATE WITH VENDOR 10" D.I.P. ' ' UTILITY PROVIDERS FOR i i r i RELOCATION OF UTILITIES " �7 \ �j 15 e 1< / 1 ���� / 0, "? �N MH o �; ► ► n I I- � FES -F I ,g6G FES -E )4 I SAN Mh' I • I h1'' o. `96o IE=958.50 960.0" i ° 959.9 IN IE=958.00 6 I FES -H '\ RIM ELE IE=959.70 co'`� J I ;0 96 1 FES -G QRn 56 -co,�� 6'-°' - -- ---= 3�= 9so4''�, ; -��p - - FESQliQ A7Q I / INV. ELLv.=y,,ri.i :(�' a, �'• IE=959.50 - CB -8 �I -� )( 960 =� _;` " *9 9--� �;* I / RE=961.10 (- _ _ x�;�o »-, »-�� _ X IE=958.00 I JI X ), uaSQ 3 +' ��.- » 959.7. T 959T2X IE=957.70 v 960 V T-,,°�'-�o, / -eg� RISER- - - 960.6 Xj �o� -T �; - - -. .. 960 T.� , x� 9F 0 - - - - - - - _� o r' ----------- --= ----------- yb 1--7--`�(- -,^-_ -IT»_ `9 - 962 ' 961 - t- - - - - - z - - ------ ,----tom`----1-' ---- - - --------- 0.- -■ ■ ■ CB -9 -t 3% - 962 - - "s---- �,q p �! QF1 F rea_ m,vX----rn----� �o�b1.5 e o -C -1 9 RE=961.20-�e -- - d'-- -- Y.��- - `�_'= e,------- ----=`6 sq`' o �' I' IE=958.00 P, �1 •'°�6 00� �(. ; �.4 ?° b' - , -9&2\ I 10 jI RE=961.20 I I l } 9 �p IE=956.50 IN l� r�� N g62 or�A IM o,�,'P °e - -oti l �- > IE=958.00 OUT --- - - - I I -g �2 gFWEASE}o�V 77962 ------ -- -- �- -- _o ,�", \. > �.- 'f? oo'►' _ _ - - r , '\ ofvry° ' � X 963.0 >C 962.9 x a63.'�_ _, \ `2.5% ' O I Q I�• �e'' 1 M7, I I I \n .lI 6 21I I X962.8x ( 096J96j.-- w ---- ---- -- `O ��------------------•-------- ----- -------- 0) 963 - - cr_ I II I'' I 109 109 Il I II I l 4P II ; 11 g .2 ' g , r !0z.o% 11 X 9 62.2 l I g621g1 \\ +i I UNDERGROUND w 11 e�tiIepl i / oEv BUILDING B I I 1 \61 SYSTEM �I BUILDING A 962 ;! X NWL = 958.00 \ i 9 2.5 I i 6,9 76 SF 6, 9 76 SF I I I 12 YR = 958.59 963.1 X) O 11 I II CB -16- I \\ 10 YR = 959.34 '-•2 11 I I RE=962.50I ; 100 YR = 960.73 FFE=963.50 IE=959.00 FFE=963.50 • I I lo,�� I SEE DETAIL THIS _ t o 6` 3 SHEET \ X 961.9 I I eee I 1 962.0 ! \ u u u-o-o-o-O"o"o"0"0"`0'''0'0 0 , - \ 3. \ �� u v-o'O-O'O"O"O"O O"'O"'O O O O„O_O_O 0 0 0 ° ° M ° d° d - -°- d•• d d d ''' d' d d d d d d d d d� d ___ , �'o d �- 1 , o= o- O- d 0 0 0 0 °odo hod„°„d O d O d O d •----------------------------- -- 7� --L1ME • - + I� - -''6 I------- - - Io 0 la 1 963.7X X I I CO 1 / ----- 96�-.-.-�.-.-. -�-fir I �^ o �6� °e I m CB -2 963.7 9 6.5 �I �' I / . - . - . . - . - • Ir , I I .g, - oti° ,.�� Q��° �° (c=n RE=961.60 , - CB -1 1-r� h I I a ,'-� �o I I IE=956.50 1\ RE=961.60 I IE=958.20 I ni I ,�et➢ °l!��`------------- 60-60-8o; vd oO Oo OO Oo�I d_ 9OX I OdO"O OO"°o .go. A ° oogo;ouo RE=961.90 ° °0°odpd° °uu° 3.o °° °'Ooododo°do°ododod I 960.9 MOW IE=958.70 II IIX \ 6 1 3.0% LINE I I I 6 I1. I \ r MOWI I I I QD Q0I I I I X 961 CY)�IX961.0 - xl 1.� \ LINE N i t �' I rn BUILDING C �� BUILDING D ;; I ;1 I II '+ I 'off' 2.o6'I X 960.6 I I rn I ' 964.5 X I I I II Myo I. / `�° 6, 9 76 SF 6, 9 76 SF I „ ,4 l/I X 9610.1• �^' X 96� 963.9 40' 2.0% � �} CB -17 Ill 198ti II I I I 8 I I 'I l I 98yyo1'1 / � RE=962.50 III n I I I I FFE=963.50 I WO FI_NCE FFE=963.50 IE=959.00 _ I I �'- II I I Q I 964.4 1 °j � I CO , F4 + �- �/ 109 II 10' 1 Q 9 .2.. ON - 4- �1� LINE M I • v ca, 109 ,- I X 961.5 / I I \ I I --- ---- --- - bC{.4ti I I I I II 6 --- --- I ' \ ^• r e - I e ti: J 1:963 --�lf --------- ---- '----� 1 I I ^ I �►? -r---- ------ 963 .-- - --------- ------ , - m r---- ------ I I' w� X96 o I X 95�. 611 \ IX X 963.8 I \ I 9d z.s I l , 9� 23 a rn I I p1 I e� - -------- - --- - - - --- - --- -`- - o� - l CB- X l.' -- 2.71 Ao g62 2.71 ??O °ec►'� X RE- 961.1096 963.8 CB -13 -�k'e` 62.31 2.77 ��,ti 2.71_, i I 0- IE=956.50 - I RE=961.10 -- -- I .4 �. 1 I IE=957.90 I 1 962 o`�-� --- x"61.4 --- '�e -- I I I•. ---,CHAINLINK I I °@ �` ory_-- -- 962.-_9�-�.4 4 e ------ I- -- ,; Id oo ------ FENCE CORNER + �- ------ -- 0 - o r- ----- t� , Io ` g0ti�' - ---- -------, - CB -12 "'� I I1�N�2.5% I 5.1 FT. EAST OF LOT LINE I rl RE=961.10\ \ I 2.5% I' _ I \ I I?59.0 \ \ IE -957.60 � \ I I \ \ \ X /X962.7 9�v,1 e 963.4 I d° • i i �90� --- --------��--, 963 -- -----� ----� ----�- o -i ------------- ---- -- -fin -�, 963 ---- I --- --- _ J it 01 I n I ► r \ a I I `J ^ I 0 I \\ 1 • Ill I 11 I I 1 \ 1110 I II 109 109 X 961 3 { it % I II \\ \\ \X 962.4 CHAINLINK 9 2 Il I' X 961.8 961.2 X ' 1 \ ONELIOT LINE. �o II /\ J �� i 2.0% 1 0 \ 1 \ rnX960.5 0 2.0% II•� i °;�I gz BUILDING E BUILDING F o • e I 76 SF I 1 1 X 958.6 69 I X 962.6 1 I /Ill j Q0 6,9 76 SF 1_ NII ° 1 II CB -18 C° Cri RE=962.50 i I I X 60.41 FFE=963.50 • Ill FFE=963.50 IE=959.00 I I QIP I 0 1 ' X 9 .91 00 -3.or � I I I �I''61 I� X 961.5 - I �---5.1-c`on � f': ' ' J i 0 �o u u o-o-o-o-o"o"o"o9090 , 0 0_0_0_0_0_ , 1 J. I 3•0% I\ v -o' O-O"O"O"O"O"O'"'O�Ov00000 O,�.ddd0000�0000000 O O'Sd0 OI -O O O O O [) t)_n '- , v u 0 0 0 0 0 0 0� 'O o"O�O • d o d o 0 o d o d o d d o ' 1 ------------ • o % :i:�\ 1 X 958.7 _ _ . - . r 960. . - . -�� I o'' g6� / I� a l CB -4 7 r� oo,�cQ o,Og� 2.,9 / e'fi' - RE=961.60 CB- 15 1010 2-17 1 IE=956.50 RE=961.60 = I �� } rn I I (o IE=957.40 °e-,. I }a }o• o 1� la r' 1 I a� a ° la 96 1-I CB -14 J g6 0 0 961.4 X X 961.3 ,p �°�` 1961.4 1� r • ' RE=961.90 \ 1 ' rn IE= 958.70 --- --------------------z----------- � :932. r----�E-9 ��o-dd-° ° \ u o o -o -o -o o�o �\ �^ ____-_-__-_-_- o� o-o-o`o8o"o"o"o o 0 0 0.0„0.0.01°0_°.� I t5�-- - - - - - o u a o o -o 0 0 00"0 o ;o m°o 0 0 0 0_0_0_o n ��- Q, I / u v u u-o-o=o- -o"0 0-? 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0.0.0 _ 0 91 2,g� e ? ; , I ,�odod�d ,d d„ ° d ° d ° d ° \ I -� i X 959.9 }} 1 .aye s0 I I� oll hX 961.0 1 l 1 X 11 961.3 'Co,\ I 0 I� 1 �� , 1 l yg s � ladti° 1,.a% I' I BUILDING G\ I ' _~ �� 7 � BUILDING H ., , I �pti�i. i 6 976 SF --- - �� 11 6,976 SF x 961 1 co , f I l s !11 l CB -19 � � � I I VIII I X 962. CHAINLINK X l962.3 Ill RE=962.50 \ FFE=963.50 I ! 0I1 FENCE +�- I� 1 ;I I FFE=963.50 IE=959.00 \ I' 1/ X960.7 0.5 FT. WEST OF LOT LINE. 'll 109 Y 109 1 0 I A I 1 I 2.0% e I ;1 I- -9_&3------- ------- �pIN 0 . (n e?3° 1 -------------�----��-- --- -------- - --- ,-- 1$ CB -6 ,O \ I ► Qp \ r J ep, , >< 9901.1 X 960.6 „° oraA \ QP RE=961.40 \ }ooM \ `�� 951.7 � eg / t IE=957.50 �b X 62.4 i `.9 ,5 ?o I I 1962�I - ' NI m ---------------------------- �. I°$ 962.9X 0.61 �° 0.e,7962.6x oy I -Y0.s,% I e----------------==- -- ° -----o----=__=- ___=_------------- r -------------------------- -_ -=- --- 0 RE 961 40 962---------------------------�C��962 ---� CY 960 ��I I IE=956.50 / , 0 1111 LANDSCAPE RE=961.40' , / -960 - - ��2 959 + IE=957.00 959,958 l� �� 958 957 - �\ 40 1 ,--EDGING/MULCH \ I 1 956 957 ~C =�, N ' 956 / $ r ( -96\ -- CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER + \- ,��^`1 $ �� 962.2 \ FES -BJ °e ' - � -�__ FES-C� � X ---_g \ ! =' 5.8 FT. EAST OF LOT LINE IE=957.50 I 62 `- `, IE=958.50 $ O 967.2 ,\ FES -D _� ,' 96 -- SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST \\ 9 ill\rn ` IE=957.00 X956 u Uk') a 956 dei �O-X 0- J CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER + �- SIC ` 957 - \, 958 957 3 1\ l 1/4 OF SECTION 14, T. 121, R. 25 0.4 FT. WEST OF LOT CORNER L` `-T 959 958 ` g5c _ I , ' '960 - � N 89°14 00 E N 89°23.06--E -- `a,,� 962 960 -- -�---- n :an.,_--------- ------ 001------------=�n--�--- "---,-_---- i ---- 1899.53------ , �, Uif C --- y 962 _ 1--------- - ----- 964.2x AFS �' �/ JVG.J I o°o° ------------------------ -------------------�_ X -G9- �0 i��- X_ l `;� a�� --X961.3 - �- _ _--- 963.7 0 0 o a,, 63 _ F� y - - - L/L`�- -6� 1 _ / l o ` �3 �2" P - _�� -mow 962- 0 °a°a°o°o�° R�`__------------ --96 c� g6 o d _�� __.6 a° - �E _ _ SHED - 2- - - 6 - _ LINEQFC\�� -,C 958.96 - - - - - - _ _ ��� _ X 961.6 - �q�`.�� l --- --�--- g61;'_ _�\-960- X960.2 o, STORM WATER N1CURB 960.5 XI --TEL. '-- LANDSCAPE �h 959�\Xlh INFILTRATION BASIN "\ STOP I RISER EDGING/MULCH �G X LANDSCAPE -= ' NWL = 958.50 CB 1 EDGING /ROCK GOLDEN EAGLE ROAD 2 YR YR = 956.97 589 3 � LEV.=958.16- - _-=SOUTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL _ _ _ _ _ _ - - 8c SHRUBS 100 YR = 959.49 1 � PARK (DOC.# 275353) AS MONUMENTED; ALSO ;g X �� I NORTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF KLEIN FARMS SEE BASIN DETAIL -- 958.7 ON DETAIL SHEET I ESTATES 2ND ADDITION (DOC.# 753470) � --- 1-----� i---- i A r-, n H r� _T_ A I_T_ F__ ahs N I I I A F--'\ Fes► I_T_ I /--"\ N I I I I I 0 30 60 90 r i r GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET SURVEY DATA SURVEY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY: MEYER ROHLIN LAND SERVICES 708 1st AVENUE NE BUFFALO, MN 55313 DATED: APRIL 18, 2017 BENCHMARK: MN/DOT GEODETIC MONUMENT "8605 S" ELEVATION = 966.55 NAVD88 DATUM PROJECT LOCATION PART OF THE SW41 AND NES, SECTION 14 TOWNSHIP 121, RANGE 25, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA. EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 2, BLOCK 3, OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA. GENERAL GRADING NOTES: 1. Specifications applicable for this project: Current standard specifications for Monticello, MN, and the latest Minnesota Department of Transportation Specifications for Highway Construction and all NPDES requirements except where modified by these contract documents. 2. OSHA requirements shall be followed for all work on this project. 3. The Contractor shall notify "Gopher State One Call" 48 hours prior to any excavation (1 -800-252-1166.) 4. The Grading Contractor shall verify all locations and elevations of underground utilities with utility companies prior to any construction, and immediately notify the Engineer of any conflicts. 5. Erosion Control shall be constructed, as applicable, as sequenced below: A. Silt Fence. B. Rock Construction Entrance. C. Demolition D. Common excavation (grading). E. Seed and mulch or sod (See notes on Landscape plan). 6. Final Plat shall govern for easements and lot dimensions. 7. Any erosion control items necessary to protect adjacent properties shall be constructed by the Grading Contractor. 8. Erosion control maintenance shall be performed by the Grading Contractor, and removed as per the Contract Documents or as directed by the Engineer, followed by all necessary restoration of disturbed area. This work shall be incidental to the grading contract. 9. The Grading Contractor shall schedule the soils engineer to facilitate certification of all controlled fills in a timely fashion. Density tests shall meet the following: A. Within the upper 3' of streets, the Grading Contractor shall utilize approved soils that are within 1% of the optimum moisture content as defined by the Standard Proctor Test -ASTM: D-698 with compaction meeting 100% Standard Proctor Density and not exceeding this compaction by more than 1 %. Below the upper 3', compaction shall meet 95% Standard Proctor Density, and be within 3% of the optimum moisture content. Grading tolerances shall be 0.1'. B. Grading tolerances for the remainder of the site shall be 0.25'. 10. All areas of unsuitable soils found in the pad described above that cannot be corrected shall be located in the field by the Grading Contractor. The Grading Contractor shall immediately notify the Engineer of these areas and provide information as to their size and location. 11. The Grading contractor shall provide positive drainage on the site at all times. 12. The Grading Contractor shall keep public streets and travel ways clear of soil and debris. Daily cleaning at the construction entrance shall be performed, especially at the end of each day's work. 13. All silt fence shall be removed at project completion. 14. All proposed elevations are at flow line unless otherwise noted. 15. All erosion control best manage practices shall be per City standards. INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: CO PROJECT LOCATION PLAN C1 SITE PLAN C2 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN C3 SANITARY AND WATER UTILITY PLAN C4 STORM SEWER UTILITY PLAN C5 LANDSCAPE PLAN C6 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C7 EXISTING CONDITIONS AND REMOVALS PLAN C8 DETAILS C9 PHASING PLAN LM ca W � N O (0 z mow, C Q J . soft (U a. p w �•+ z z UCo LU cc z :3 Z -a z_ o Cw .Q Q� IQ CL soft 00C �z ■�1 O Q C Q W 121:� ca UU C� _R"^ v, 00 a lZ 14 N �4 (n cp N C C ~ I p Lo E C44�co� I o p Lo r- -6 W o, c C W 00 Q� 3 CX C ti v1 I c 3 q)42 ° o CO2 V I� �CL tea,°w = g�� o S `�, 1-1 C� c co W q) O 3 a ° °' C t " o a) ° ZZ 11-, Q_ W 101 FILE NO. 00633 Grading and Drainage Plan (n O m O m O W p W ti 0 Q o a W v FILE NO. 00633 Grading and Drainage Plan I I ROADDUNDASI I I � 10" D.I.P. I I I I I 1 1 I I I I- II I I I I I � 15" R.C.P. I I > Q, ► o �� ► ► ► a� ► ► ► ► ; > -� QL "? SAN MH RIM ELEV.=960.04 SAN MH' BUILDING ��' 11 1p i INV. ELEV.=942.8 RIM ELEV.=961.96 SETBACK LINE + + + INV. ELEV.=943.7 I I -,, +� + + +� 30' FRONT 00' 0" E Plat) '+ + + , , ' / O \+ + + I; 7 (�! ., , _ N_88 3 53 EcD 14 -r T N�'-I- TFL RISER iV`_'`•J ' ';-�T -;T-'OT 14 150.0 150.0 7 -�- -300. 0=T__ T , T- 150.0 _T -T 1 _ --/ 20.,0-• �-- 14.b - c 20.0 i 1 �� + 16 d a -- c, }i i-6 0+u----------------------'---r--T- T � � f � f � � + +_+ I - ---------0000-- _ - i; + �Q_+ +_+ + + + ++ + `'+--�++-++ + + I+ + + + + + + + F + + + + +�+ `+ + {I + + 1+ + + + - + + + + + + +7+7 + + + I + + + + + + + + + 404+ + + + + + + + 4 + + + + 1+ + + ++ + F + + 9 + + + + 9 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + p+ + + r + + + + + + ++ o+ + +13 IT T-11 +o+ + ++ + + ++ + + +__ -I.+_- _+ T +. + + +o+ + ++�0-+ _+ + + 9.0 + + + + + + [ ++-+ + + + ++ + + + + + + + + + + + ++ + + 5 ++ + + + + + +6 + I '' ; Q / ; + +a + + + + +1 + + s+ \8 ,.+.. + � ++ + ; �3 6 m 13 +±vO v+Co o+ + + + + + + + + +�R++1w + + + + + 9.1 cr 1 1 ct _FA Q +� +, + + 11 cn, BUILDING + +1 + " ;+++I ++� 109 �, 109 + I+ +I BUILDING SETBACK LINE +I+++ +++ +'11 SETBACK LINE 15' EXISTING ++++'� F,}+J++ 1 o; 15' EXISTING INTERIOR SIDE � + 1++ +� �` + + , L� o }+1}+A � -5.0 BUILDING B � p1+++�++� �, INTERIOR SIDE 1 +}1+}+ BUILDING 6,9 76 SF 5.0� 6,976 SF 111+Ln + C T_ I + + + �1++++++;I t++�+} LOT 1 LOT 2 1.20.0+ t++►F++ 23,100 SF 23, 094 SF 11+ -6.0-? 10. + + +� ---20.0A 0.53 AC I I+ + I + 11 ;++' 0.53 AC 36.0 ,I 1-6.0+ANI 0 0 u .0006°-°-°-°-°-°-°1°,1°u°°° + + I + ;I I+ {F v o-O-o"O-ot Jquo:OvOv°u°u�o�0�0�0�0�000�000�00010 O O O O O O �%•� } 1F }II ` I U O.O_O-O-O"O`O"O.:OvOvOVOu�ODO�ODO�ODO�ODO�Ou O O O O O OI°O.. .f( +36. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 + + + + + + + + + + +1+ + + + +I +io 13 + T�� + + + + + + + + + + I+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 1 + O + +11 :+ + o + T + + + + + + + + +• + wF + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 2 + + + + + + + +11 13 W ++ +Qtr + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + - + + + + + + + + Ii m 1 1+ + + + + + 2 + + + + + + + + + + of + + + + + + + + + + 1 + + + + + + + + + + + +l I + + + + + + + T + + + + + 1 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + I,; d 1+ + + + + + + + + F + + + + + + + + + + + ..... + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +" = 14 1 ++++++++++ 150.0 +++++,++++ ++� � T+++++1+ . T d i+ { + + + + + T T + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + t + it 14 +++++++++++++�+' ++T++++ +++++++ 150.0 ++++++++++++ ;+ * + + + + + + + + + + + +++ + + + + ++ + + + + + + + ++ + + + + + + + + +;1+ + + + + + + +T4-.. + + +++ + 0''0- + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 2 + + + + + + + + + II © 1 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + o +1+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + o. + + + ++ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + �' i ++ +� . + + + + + + + + + + + + +� + + + + + {_ * }---F---r-- T- -T - f- + + + + + + + + + iw�-r + + y +0-0"0"0"0"0 ++1+ +. -T t + + + + +(I++ + y J u o 0 0 0 - o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0, 0 0.0.00 + +I +;+ } � +�$ av v u-o"O-O-O-O "O•'O"O�O�O°0°O 001000000000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o._o_O �� + +++��o°o°o°o°o°oo^000000000�0 0 0, 0 0 0 0 0 0._ o_ 0 0 ° o + + MOW _-- 1 + + + LOT 4 + + + + + 111 LOT 3 LINE ; I + �+ + 0 ,F + + 20, 400 SF 20 390 SF ++ ++ I I + + + , � + +I + 11 ;�---mow 1F +1 + � , + 1+I 1 + I+ + � 0.47 AC 0.47 AC + + + ;1 LINE 'f + I + *' O o ; + y --5.o BUILDING D + �; + + + �I 1 +I + BUILDING C+ + Q0 i + + + ;� 5.0-- F 6,9 76 SF + + ++++++11 6 976 SF ill+ +I -FI + „ 1 1 + 4 + 14 M+ +1 + 11 ; 1--=20.0-*' 1 i*+ 4(t) F -NCE ++ s.oF-+7 Q y' 9.9 IM` �. W 0 109-j5 + + 11 w +, + n7E 109 1 35.9 + 11 Q 0.0 + + +11 -� X6.0 + p - '. 6.0 • J�' I l� �• ° : I + + + + +I 20.0 - �-�'• f'_7 + + + + + + +// Q�\j\+ + + + + + + + +� + 1 +;; o + + +7�' + + + I + + + +� + + .. . . + + + + + + � l! � + � r - -+ + + I I 1+ 1 li wCC) ;+ + 1� �,F + + + +� CJ �r + + + N +�+, + + + + + + + + + ��+ + 6 3 3 ' + +11 O ; + + + f + + I �i \ 6 + + 3 0- o + + + + + + + + + + j + + + + + + ^ 1+ + + + + + + h + r -0 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + - + + + + +11 I + + + + 5 + + + 9+0 � + + + + + + + + + + + +I + + +1 + I+ + + , �cot + + O I l 1 + + + + + + + �+ + + +� + + + + + + + + .} .' - 1_- - T �- + + + ) + + + O co �}- 1+ +oo+�++ +;Q3++++++1+++ +--+ +++N F ++. ++ +_ 1 }+}+}++ 7 F+++++++ , ++++ ++++++ �p ++ 00 Mid +��+++0+++7+ 9 150.0 F�+o++ ++ ++++++++ �g �` 1 I� 14d O d _ � I+ + + + + + + + + + �- + i T + + + + + + + +-p+ + + a o 1 + n O -O ° 0 14 i1 1 T T + +'+ + + + + + + KI + + +T+ + 9 150.0 7 + + + + + + o+ + +apt + r� I I 1 I I I I I I I I J� O F + + + + T7++ + + + 'b•+ + + + + +-+ + + + + +++ + + + + + + IF + ++ + + + + + + + + + + + + + +ir + + I .-� - CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER I+ Q + a1 1 T + + + + + + + + + + + + + ++ '� +! + + F ++ + + + F + + + + 5.1 FT. EAST OF LOT LINE + + + + + +' j + + ++ + + + + + + + 126 [F + 1 + F 3 + �� +1 + A +1 0 d + + F 8 �. + + 1-1 �I I I 1F ++ +� '- - + +I + ++ +11 f 109 �' + I+ f +1 + 109 + + + CHAINLINK ++1+++ o +++++_1 O c0 00 � FENCE + \- 1 + + + + + fi1 I 0 O ON LOT LINE. O 1+ ++ +++r�++';I 1 ) O o --5.0 BUILDING F + 1+ +11 ++; ++ BUILDING E F+ + + II + +II ++ ++ 6, 976 SF 5.0� 6,9 76 SF �+ + + ;; O + {IF + LOT 5 LOT 6+ + + I, 1++IF++ 20,384 SF 26'0 20.0 20, 400 SF 0.47 AC ~ 9.9 1 35.9�- I -t-1++ 0.47 AC _ + + 1i 6'0+ + o•o o'o 0 0�0°0"o e°s.� o`°'O�° ° ou00000000000000000000°0°0 0 0 0 0 0_0_0 + + + i O-O-O-O-O-O`O"O " O"O�0"0"606"606081808 . O_o_° 1+ �O O O O o o° />T --T ++ _i44 -36.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0_0.0_ °T + `� + 1� + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +�cP +ii 1+ { + p +I + + + _�__+ __+ -� I I Y:P - . + + + '+ + + + + + + + + 1 + 1 + + + + + T + / ,�-, \� + + + + + +;; 0 1 + + Q�•+ + + + + + + + + + + + 0 + + + + . + + + + + + + + + + + + + ` L J+ + + + + + + :++I + �+ + + + +0+ + + + + + + + + + O- + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +' + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + T + + + + + + + + + + + + 1 + + + + + + + + + + + + + 1+ + + + + + + + + + + + + ... + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 11 d +++++++++++ 150.0++++++++ ++++++++++++++++++� 14 I+ + + + + + + + + + + + . + + + + + + 1 ' , T T T + + + + + + + + + + + it + II,iI - I + I a T T T + + + + +I + + + + " + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 1f1 d 14 ;+ +, +"+ + + + + + +' +' + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + . 150.0 . + + + + + + + + + + + +;I + + + + + + + + + + + + a 1 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + �, BUILDING ++ ++++++++++++++++++++++ T ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 ++++++++++++}.a + BUILDING ! } } } } } } } } 2 } } } } } } } } } } } } } } } } } } } } } } } } } + , } } } } } } �. }I SETBACK LINE SETBACK LINE '; + + -p + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +0 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + _ ; I 1 + + +1 µ +, + 0' + + + + + + + + + + + +4 -�- F- �- + + T + + + + + + + + + + t ��,-�-O-a r +1 + ;; ° 15' EXISTING o y v u u° -O -O -O -O -O O O•'O O A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • T� 1+ +�F--�--t + + + + + +� -t ✓u-�-o--'o, "�"0�0�0�0"0=0t o, o�O�O�0�0�0�O�0o000,,o O O�O,,,O„O.,O.O.o_o_r+ + +� 15 EXISTING ;� + + + a� °o°o°o°o°o°o°°° ° ° ° 0-0-0-0 ° ° O_o_°_° ;_ + + INTERIOR SIDE INTERIOR SIDE ;F +I + I LOT 7 LOT 8 + + + it 31,605 SF+i 1! I t++ 1 + A 1 31,398 SF " t+ + 0.73 AC +++ +'+ 1 0.72 AC I + + "ji + + 11 } } + + } BUILDING G y --5.0 BUILDING H `� +' k + + A 6, 9 76 SF , ;►I + ,F 1+ I~ + 11R i 6,976 SF 5.0-- l ,I+ + + 5.2 +\- { + + +� I r �'r+ + + IF + +i-- CHAINLINK :++V ++ 1 j i1,+++ ++Ico FENCE + �- I + + + J 1 r a + +I I r �,�-20.0 0.5 FT. WEST LO I+ + 14 C, 1 f �1 + IF +I N OF LOT LINE. oo . ++t++ 4 ' 109 109 9.8 +L+ ; O ; +I+-110.0 4I J1 35.8 N i++ 36.0+-- i 4� �' • ' �, - �: ° r e .. rc I +++ I ++i o --2101.0 , _ _ + + +a"+i`+�+'I lF + + + + + + + + + + + + + + I + 1 ++ I+++ � ;1 , + + + + + + +,V +(,in+ + 4 +I + + + + + + + + + + + 1 +1 It 0 0 + + - + + + + + + \ 6 3 - + + -6.0 x-6.0 + + f® + 16 3 + +a + + + + + + + + + + + 5 + + + �1 + + + h 0 + + + o� +111 5 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + I' + + +� 'A,� 0 + + I' + + R�� + + + + + IF + + + + + + + i + + + + + + + + + + + be + + + + + + ;; I 1 2 \f + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +�+ + + + + + + + 7 + + + + +�+ + + + + + + 0 + + + + + +, 13 + + + 7 + + + + + + N + + + 1 + r + + + + + + + + + + l y; I + + + + + + + + +? + + + + + r + + + + 9 +++ 7 4 + + ... + + + + ; +�+ 4 + + + - + +__+_ ±+_O___E +.j + -` 1 1 1 + T - f-""�- + + + + + + + + + + fes' ------- \y + + + + +---+--- - f --T - T + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + , + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + f t--------- --*---�--f= t== __ _= Y == --------------- - -- �o 12 �-__-.�--L---1-_-�-- -- -- 00 00-__:.___::__:: __= ---------- .11 000-0000-- •o .11 - \i o LANDSCAPE - - -- --- ;� EDGING/MULCH - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ; % --CHAINLINK CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER + \- I STORM WATER 1 5.8 FT. EAST OF LOT LINE 1 o MANAGEMENT BASIN � L -w -r- ' 1 0 o ,-- SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER +�- I�--,. - 5� - - 15�- - - 1/4 OF SECTION 14, T. 121, R. 25 0.4 FT. WEST OF LOT CORNER _--\\ 1� =�- - - - - - - - - - - _ _ " N 89°14'00" E \ \ ` EASE _N \`� i --- 150.0 _ -t--0000-- _ -- ----- ------ - N 89°14 00 ` --------------------0000-- -- 149.8 -0- ---� 1899 53 0000- ----- -- ------3123.56----- ----�, . --- o 0000- 99.81 N °14'00" E - 0000 _ I >Oou° -_--> -----------0000-- - - �V - - - - 0 ° ,°°o°°°�° °a°\ °° MOW °° °d°°°°OO66, °° SHE C0LINE 13' cP - 13 13 SI " 13 �0 13 13 -CURB 13 13 13 --LANDSCAPE 13 �% ° 13 , STOP (N 89 ti , 1 1 W Plat ; RISER EDGING/MULCH LANDSCAPE -= ' ��'-- - CB � \ G OLDEN EAGLE ROAD - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ EDGING/ROCK BUILDING - ELEV.=9.16- - \�'-=SOUTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL 8c SHRUBS SETBACK LINE PARK (DOC.# 275353) AS MONUMENTED; ALSO NORTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF KLEIN FARMS I I 1 15' REAR %� 1 ESTATES 2ND ADDITION (DOC.# 753470) 1 1 1 F-- - -- ------ F -- - - - - -I - I 1 A A H r� _T_ A I_T_ F__ I F-"\ n F--'\ F'i I_T_ I /-`\ N i I PROJECT LOCATION PART OF THE SWj AND NE4, SECTION 14 TOWNSHIP 121, RANGE 25, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA. EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 2, BLOCK 3, OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA. LEGEND: SITE PLAN NOTES: 1. ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO FACE OF CURB, EDGE OF SIDEWALK OR EXTERIOR OF BUILDING UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR LOCATION OF EXITS, RAMPS, CONCRETE APRONS AND STOOPS. 2. TACK SHALL BE USED ON BITUMINOUS EDGE PRIOR TO PATCHING. MATCH EXISTING GRADES. 3. ALL CONCRETE SIDEWALKS ADJACENT TO BUILDING SHALL BE SEPARATED WITH A 2" EXPANSION JOINT. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL CONDUIT REQUIREMENTS FOR SITE LIGHTING, COMMUNICATION, SPRINKLER, ETC WITH OWNER PRIOR TO PAVING. 5. ACCESSIBLE ROUTE SHALL BE PROVIDED FROM ACCESSIBLE STALLS TO BUILDING ENTRANCE (SEE ADAAG REQUIREMENTS). POLE MOUNT APPROVED SIGNS CENTERED ON STALLS. PAINT INTERNATIONAL SYMBOL OF ACCESSIBILITY ON STALL. 6. CONSTRUCT ACCESSIBLE PEDESTRIAN RAMP PER ADAAG AND MNDOT STANDARDS INCLUDING CONTRASTING DETECTABLE WARNING METAL TRUNCATED DOME PANELS. 7. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING WITH FIRE MARSHAL FOR POSTING OF FIRE LANES, CURB MARKING AND SIGNAGE IF NEEDED. 8. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR DEMOLITION AND REMOVAL OF ALL EXISTING SITE FEATURES THAT INTERFERE WITH NEW WORK AS SHOWN. 9. ALL NEW UTILITIES MUST BE UNDERGROUND. COORDINATE LOCATIONS WITH LOCAL UTILITY COMPANIES. 10.SIDEWALKS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH CROSS SLOPE OF 1.5% WITH ADJUSTMENT +/- 0.5%. SIDEWALKS WILL BE INSPECTED AFTER CONSTRUCTION. ANY SIDEWALK EXCEEDING 2.0% CROSS SLOPE WILL NEED TO BE REPLACED AT CONTRACTORS EXPENSE. GENERAL NOTES: 1. PRIOR TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THAT ALL REQUIRED PERMITS AND APPROVALS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED. NO CONSTRUCTION OR FABRICATION SHALL BEGIN UNTIL THE CONTRACTOR HAS THOROUGHLY REVIEWED ALL PLANS AND OTHER DOCUMENTS APPROVED BY THE PERMITTING AUTHORITIES. 2. WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND THE REQUIREMENTS AND STANDARDS OF THE LOCAL GOVERNING AUTHORITY. THE SOILS REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION SET FORTH THEREIN ARE A PART OF THE REQUIRED CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AND IN CASE OF CONFLICT SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE UNLESS SPECIFICALLY NOTED OTHERWISE ON THE PLANS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER OF ANY DISCREPANCY BETWEEN SOILS REPORT AND PLANS. 3. SITE CLEARING SHALL INCLUDE THE LOCATION AND REMOVAL OF ALL UNDERGROUND PIPING, VALVING, ETC. 4. SITE GRADING SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THESE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND THE RECOMMENDATIONS SET FORTH IN THE SOILS REPORT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVING AND REPLACING ALL SOFT, YIELDING OR UNSUITABLE MATERIALS AND REPLACING WITH SUITABLE MATERIALS AS SPECIFIED. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT A COMPACTION REPORT PREPARED BY A QUALIFIED SOILS ENGINEER, LICENSED WITHIN THE STATE WHERE THE WORK IS PERFORMED, VERIFYING THAT ALL FILLED AREAS AND SUBGRADE AREAS WITHIN THE BUILDING PAD AND PAVEMENT AREAS HAVE BEEN COMPACTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SET FORTH IN THE SOILS REPORT. 5. THE LOCATIONS OF THE UNDERGROUND FACILITIES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE BASED ON FIELD SURVEYS AND LOCAL UTILITY COMPANY RECORDS. IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTACT THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES TO LOCATE THEIR FACILITIES PRIOR TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION. NO ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION SHALL BE PAID TO THE CONTRACTOR FOR DAMAGE AND REPAIR TO THESE FACILITIES CAUSED BY HIS WORK FORCE. 6. ALL EXISTING DIMENSIONS AND GRADES SHOWN ON THE PLANS SHALL BE FIELD VERIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY CONSTRUCTION MANAGER IF ANY DISCREPANCIES EXIST PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION FOR NECESSARY PLAN OR GRADE CHANGES. NO EXTRA COMPENSATION SHALL BE PAID TO THE CONTRACTOR FOR WORK HAVING TO BE REDONE DUE TO DIMENSIONS OR GRADES SHOWN INCORRECTLY ON THESE PLANS IF SUCH NOTIFICATION HAS NOT BEEN GIVEN. 0 30 60 90 � I � r i GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET SURVEY DATA SURVEY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY: MEYER ROHLIN LAND SERVICES 708 1st AVENUE NE BUFFALO, MN 55313 DATED: APRIL 18, 2017 BENCHMARK: MN/DOT GEODETIC MONUMENT "8605 S" ELEVATION = 966.55 NAVD88 DATUM SITE DATA: EXISTING ZONING: 1-2 HEAVY INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT PROPOSED ZONING: PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT EXISTING PID: 155-018-003020 EXISTING LOT AREA: LOT 11: 190,770 SF = 4.38 ACRES PROPOSED BUILDING AREAS: �4 64109 BUILDING 6,976 SF x 8 = 55,808 SF X EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA 2,822 SF = 0.06 ACRES PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA 150,032 SF = 3.44 ACRES >> 78.27. CL V W 001NET IMPERVIOUS AREA INCREASE 147,210 SF = 3.38 ACRES J N O co PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA 41,800 SF = 0.96 ACRES >> 21.8% Q co man a 03 to W DISTURBANCE AREA 200,441 SF = 4.60 ACRES X L 0 W ft PARKING DATA: W _ g REQUIRED PARKING STALLS: Z W C Q [zLij OFFICE @ 1 /200sf; 10% x 55,808 sf / 200 = 28 SPACES > WAREHOUSE @ 1 /2,000sf; 90% x 55,808 sf / 2,000 = 25 SPACES 0 Total= 53 SPACES O Za:man" �o PROVIDED PARKING STALLS: a. 00 9' x 20' SPACES = 90 SPACES (INCL 8 HC SPACES) r O 12 waft SETBACK: 1-2 MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS W Lu m"^ LOCATION: BUILDING PARKING ''� v, FRONT EXISTING 30 6 Q STREET SIDE EXISTING 30 6 INTERIOR SIDE EXISTING 15 6 co INTERIOR SIDE PROPOSED 0 0 REAR YARD EXISTING 15 6 a o KEY NOTES: ° 0q) q) O BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT; SEE SECTION ON DETAIL SHEET ° -c I ,, Lo o E 0 Lo O CONCRETE PAVEMENT HEAVY DUTY, WIDTH VARIES. 6" CONCRETE 0 2 I o "O c W/6 X6#�#10/10 W.W.M. CONST. JTS @ 12 O.C.) OVER 4 CLASS 5 AGGREGATE c BASE. MnC�'OT 2461 MIX 3Y22A SLIPFORM PLACEMENT OR MnDOT 2461 MIX 3Y32A o A I CO o on m.°' MANUAL PLACEMENT. y o W •� L O O W U O U 3 CONCRETE PAVEMENT LIGHT DUTY, MIN. 5 FT WIDTH. 4" CONCRETE o ` � cw° CL O W 6"X6"- 10 10 W.W.M. (CONST. JTS 6' 0. . SEE SECTION ON SHEET 4.0. a c a `� I o / # (C @ C C C a 100 0 MnDOT 2461 IX 3Y22A SLIPFORM PLACEMENT OR MnDOT 2461 MIX 3Y32A 42 o o P r -U I - c MANUAL PLACEMENT. INTEGRAL SIDEWALK WITH THICKENED EDGE CURB FACE IS AN '� ° ac, v, �, a - ACCEPTABLE OPTION. ;, o ' OD412 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER �N' 3 ° r- MIX 3Y22A FOR MACHINE PLACEMENT (MnDOT 2461) e 0 m MIX 3Y32A FOR MANUAL PLACEMENT (MnDOT 2461) O D612 CONCRETE CURB WITH TIP -OUT GUTTER � a o MIX 3Y22A FOR MACHINE PLACEMENT (MnDOT 2461) MIX 3Y32A FOR MANUAL PLACEMENT MnDOT 2461) 3 � a NOT APPLICABLE WHEN INTEGRAL SIDEWALK WITH THICKENED EDGE CURB FACE IS TO BE CONSTRUCTED. PED. RAMP - IN ACCORDANCE WITH AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT & MnDOT O6 STANDARD PLAN 5-297.250 INCLUDING CONTRASTING DETECTABLE WARNING DEVICES. DEPRESS BACK OF CURB AT RAMP. O PAINT INTERNATIONAL SYMBOL OF ACCESSABILITY WITH WHITE LATEX PAINT. OACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN (MnDOT NOS. R7 -8A & R7-813). CENTER SIGN ON O PARKING STALL. LOCATION PER GENERAL CONTRACTOR. MOUNT ON STEEL CHANNEL POST. O PAINT 4" SOLID STRIPE - WHITE LATEX PAINT. 10 EXISTING PAVEMENT TO REMAIN. O11 EXISTING DRIVEWAY ACCESS AND CULVERT TO BE REMOVED. RESTORE GRADES TO MATCH EXISTING ROADSIDE DITCH. 12 EXISTING ADJACENT OWNERS FENCE TO REMAIN IN PLACE. 13 EXISTING ADJACENT PROPERTY TREES/SHRUBS TO REMAIN IN PLACE. 14 DIRECTIONAL TRAFFIC SIGN ON STEEL CHANNEL POST a STOP b DO NOT ENTER O c DO NOT EXIT d ONE WAY (WITH LEFT ARROW) 15 FENCE, CHAINLINK, 6.0 FT HEIGHT, INSTALL AT 1.0 FT FROM PROPERTY LINE V) 0 0 0o W W Q � v 0 a v INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: o CO PROJECT LOCATION PLAN C1 SITE PLAN C2 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN C3 SANITARY AND WATER UTILITY PLAN C4 STORM SEWER UTILITY PLAN C5 LANDSCAPE PLAN C6 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C7 EXISTING CONDITIONS AND REMOVALS PLAN C8 DETAILS C9 PHASING PLAN FILE NO. 00633 C1 Site Plan EXISTING BOUNDARY BUILDING SETBACK LINE - - - -- PROPOSED LOT LINE PROPOSED FENCE ------------------------------ PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER -=-=-=-=-=-=-= --= PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER TIP -OUT FLOWLINE ® PROPOSED PARKING STALLS .............:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:al PROPOSED BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT ° °-°-°-°-°-°-°-°-°-°-°0000-° °°°°°°°°°°°°°° 00000000000000000000000000000 PROPOSED HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT o°o°o°o°o°o°o°o°o°o°o°o°o°o°o s PROPOSED LIGHT DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT SITE PLAN NOTES: 1. ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO FACE OF CURB, EDGE OF SIDEWALK OR EXTERIOR OF BUILDING UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR LOCATION OF EXITS, RAMPS, CONCRETE APRONS AND STOOPS. 2. TACK SHALL BE USED ON BITUMINOUS EDGE PRIOR TO PATCHING. MATCH EXISTING GRADES. 3. ALL CONCRETE SIDEWALKS ADJACENT TO BUILDING SHALL BE SEPARATED WITH A 2" EXPANSION JOINT. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL CONDUIT REQUIREMENTS FOR SITE LIGHTING, COMMUNICATION, SPRINKLER, ETC WITH OWNER PRIOR TO PAVING. 5. ACCESSIBLE ROUTE SHALL BE PROVIDED FROM ACCESSIBLE STALLS TO BUILDING ENTRANCE (SEE ADAAG REQUIREMENTS). POLE MOUNT APPROVED SIGNS CENTERED ON STALLS. PAINT INTERNATIONAL SYMBOL OF ACCESSIBILITY ON STALL. 6. CONSTRUCT ACCESSIBLE PEDESTRIAN RAMP PER ADAAG AND MNDOT STANDARDS INCLUDING CONTRASTING DETECTABLE WARNING METAL TRUNCATED DOME PANELS. 7. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING WITH FIRE MARSHAL FOR POSTING OF FIRE LANES, CURB MARKING AND SIGNAGE IF NEEDED. 8. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR DEMOLITION AND REMOVAL OF ALL EXISTING SITE FEATURES THAT INTERFERE WITH NEW WORK AS SHOWN. 9. ALL NEW UTILITIES MUST BE UNDERGROUND. COORDINATE LOCATIONS WITH LOCAL UTILITY COMPANIES. 10.SIDEWALKS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH CROSS SLOPE OF 1.5% WITH ADJUSTMENT +/- 0.5%. SIDEWALKS WILL BE INSPECTED AFTER CONSTRUCTION. ANY SIDEWALK EXCEEDING 2.0% CROSS SLOPE WILL NEED TO BE REPLACED AT CONTRACTORS EXPENSE. GENERAL NOTES: 1. PRIOR TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THAT ALL REQUIRED PERMITS AND APPROVALS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED. NO CONSTRUCTION OR FABRICATION SHALL BEGIN UNTIL THE CONTRACTOR HAS THOROUGHLY REVIEWED ALL PLANS AND OTHER DOCUMENTS APPROVED BY THE PERMITTING AUTHORITIES. 2. WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND THE REQUIREMENTS AND STANDARDS OF THE LOCAL GOVERNING AUTHORITY. THE SOILS REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION SET FORTH THEREIN ARE A PART OF THE REQUIRED CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AND IN CASE OF CONFLICT SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE UNLESS SPECIFICALLY NOTED OTHERWISE ON THE PLANS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER OF ANY DISCREPANCY BETWEEN SOILS REPORT AND PLANS. 3. SITE CLEARING SHALL INCLUDE THE LOCATION AND REMOVAL OF ALL UNDERGROUND PIPING, VALVING, ETC. 4. SITE GRADING SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THESE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND THE RECOMMENDATIONS SET FORTH IN THE SOILS REPORT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVING AND REPLACING ALL SOFT, YIELDING OR UNSUITABLE MATERIALS AND REPLACING WITH SUITABLE MATERIALS AS SPECIFIED. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT A COMPACTION REPORT PREPARED BY A QUALIFIED SOILS ENGINEER, LICENSED WITHIN THE STATE WHERE THE WORK IS PERFORMED, VERIFYING THAT ALL FILLED AREAS AND SUBGRADE AREAS WITHIN THE BUILDING PAD AND PAVEMENT AREAS HAVE BEEN COMPACTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SET FORTH IN THE SOILS REPORT. 5. THE LOCATIONS OF THE UNDERGROUND FACILITIES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE BASED ON FIELD SURVEYS AND LOCAL UTILITY COMPANY RECORDS. IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTACT THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES TO LOCATE THEIR FACILITIES PRIOR TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION. NO ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION SHALL BE PAID TO THE CONTRACTOR FOR DAMAGE AND REPAIR TO THESE FACILITIES CAUSED BY HIS WORK FORCE. 6. ALL EXISTING DIMENSIONS AND GRADES SHOWN ON THE PLANS SHALL BE FIELD VERIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY CONSTRUCTION MANAGER IF ANY DISCREPANCIES EXIST PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION FOR NECESSARY PLAN OR GRADE CHANGES. NO EXTRA COMPENSATION SHALL BE PAID TO THE CONTRACTOR FOR WORK HAVING TO BE REDONE DUE TO DIMENSIONS OR GRADES SHOWN INCORRECTLY ON THESE PLANS IF SUCH NOTIFICATION HAS NOT BEEN GIVEN. 0 30 60 90 � I � r i GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET SURVEY DATA SURVEY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY: MEYER ROHLIN LAND SERVICES 708 1st AVENUE NE BUFFALO, MN 55313 DATED: APRIL 18, 2017 BENCHMARK: MN/DOT GEODETIC MONUMENT "8605 S" ELEVATION = 966.55 NAVD88 DATUM SITE DATA: EXISTING ZONING: 1-2 HEAVY INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT PROPOSED ZONING: PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT EXISTING PID: 155-018-003020 EXISTING LOT AREA: LOT 11: 190,770 SF = 4.38 ACRES PROPOSED BUILDING AREAS: �4 64109 BUILDING 6,976 SF x 8 = 55,808 SF X EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA 2,822 SF = 0.06 ACRES PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA 150,032 SF = 3.44 ACRES >> 78.27. CL V W 001NET IMPERVIOUS AREA INCREASE 147,210 SF = 3.38 ACRES J N O co PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA 41,800 SF = 0.96 ACRES >> 21.8% Q co man a 03 to W DISTURBANCE AREA 200,441 SF = 4.60 ACRES X L 0 W ft PARKING DATA: W _ g REQUIRED PARKING STALLS: Z W C Q [zLij OFFICE @ 1 /200sf; 10% x 55,808 sf / 200 = 28 SPACES > WAREHOUSE @ 1 /2,000sf; 90% x 55,808 sf / 2,000 = 25 SPACES 0 Total= 53 SPACES O Za:man" �o PROVIDED PARKING STALLS: a. 00 9' x 20' SPACES = 90 SPACES (INCL 8 HC SPACES) r O 12 waft SETBACK: 1-2 MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS W Lu m"^ LOCATION: BUILDING PARKING ''� v, FRONT EXISTING 30 6 Q STREET SIDE EXISTING 30 6 INTERIOR SIDE EXISTING 15 6 co INTERIOR SIDE PROPOSED 0 0 REAR YARD EXISTING 15 6 a o KEY NOTES: ° 0q) q) O BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT; SEE SECTION ON DETAIL SHEET ° -c I ,, Lo o E 0 Lo O CONCRETE PAVEMENT HEAVY DUTY, WIDTH VARIES. 6" CONCRETE 0 2 I o "O c W/6 X6#�#10/10 W.W.M. CONST. JTS @ 12 O.C.) OVER 4 CLASS 5 AGGREGATE c BASE. MnC�'OT 2461 MIX 3Y22A SLIPFORM PLACEMENT OR MnDOT 2461 MIX 3Y32A o A I CO o on m.°' MANUAL PLACEMENT. y o W •� L O O W U O U 3 CONCRETE PAVEMENT LIGHT DUTY, MIN. 5 FT WIDTH. 4" CONCRETE o ` � cw° CL O W 6"X6"- 10 10 W.W.M. (CONST. JTS 6' 0. . SEE SECTION ON SHEET 4.0. a c a `� I o / # (C @ C C C a 100 0 MnDOT 2461 IX 3Y22A SLIPFORM PLACEMENT OR MnDOT 2461 MIX 3Y32A 42 o o P r -U I - c MANUAL PLACEMENT. INTEGRAL SIDEWALK WITH THICKENED EDGE CURB FACE IS AN '� ° ac, v, �, a - ACCEPTABLE OPTION. ;, o ' OD412 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER �N' 3 ° r- MIX 3Y22A FOR MACHINE PLACEMENT (MnDOT 2461) e 0 m MIX 3Y32A FOR MANUAL PLACEMENT (MnDOT 2461) O D612 CONCRETE CURB WITH TIP -OUT GUTTER � a o MIX 3Y22A FOR MACHINE PLACEMENT (MnDOT 2461) MIX 3Y32A FOR MANUAL PLACEMENT MnDOT 2461) 3 � a NOT APPLICABLE WHEN INTEGRAL SIDEWALK WITH THICKENED EDGE CURB FACE IS TO BE CONSTRUCTED. PED. RAMP - IN ACCORDANCE WITH AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT & MnDOT O6 STANDARD PLAN 5-297.250 INCLUDING CONTRASTING DETECTABLE WARNING DEVICES. DEPRESS BACK OF CURB AT RAMP. O PAINT INTERNATIONAL SYMBOL OF ACCESSABILITY WITH WHITE LATEX PAINT. OACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN (MnDOT NOS. R7 -8A & R7-813). CENTER SIGN ON O PARKING STALL. LOCATION PER GENERAL CONTRACTOR. MOUNT ON STEEL CHANNEL POST. O PAINT 4" SOLID STRIPE - WHITE LATEX PAINT. 10 EXISTING PAVEMENT TO REMAIN. O11 EXISTING DRIVEWAY ACCESS AND CULVERT TO BE REMOVED. RESTORE GRADES TO MATCH EXISTING ROADSIDE DITCH. 12 EXISTING ADJACENT OWNERS FENCE TO REMAIN IN PLACE. 13 EXISTING ADJACENT PROPERTY TREES/SHRUBS TO REMAIN IN PLACE. 14 DIRECTIONAL TRAFFIC SIGN ON STEEL CHANNEL POST a STOP b DO NOT ENTER O c DO NOT EXIT d ONE WAY (WITH LEFT ARROW) 15 FENCE, CHAINLINK, 6.0 FT HEIGHT, INSTALL AT 1.0 FT FROM PROPERTY LINE V) 0 0 0o W W Q � v 0 a v INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: o CO PROJECT LOCATION PLAN C1 SITE PLAN C2 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN C3 SANITARY AND WATER UTILITY PLAN C4 STORM SEWER UTILITY PLAN C5 LANDSCAPE PLAN C6 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C7 EXISTING CONDITIONS AND REMOVALS PLAN C8 DETAILS C9 PHASING PLAN FILE NO. 00633 C1 Site Plan I I � 1 I I I DUN DAS ROAD x� ' 1 - ----_�\ - - 10" D.I.P. 1 O I ' 15 R.C.P. 00 � �, N MH 000 S"T I �' I �1� I 960 RIM ELEV.=960.04 SAN MH 1 ; • I g6�� 6�� �� 960.Oo - - °s 959.90 INV. ELFDV,.=942.8 RIM ELEV.=961.96 �h I I 960.66 `� �6 )-�' - - 6°�= 960°s )�� - o ' 959.79 INV. ELEV.=943.7 , °��° 1�,0 y 9s� �� 961_11 i )< - - - - - - - -)` 960 s ° q - - - '� 61�'°6- - - �'s r 900 960 - -I - - _ _ /`8so �59»_-n- _ _ _x 958.6 I - -9 �1 g - 959.2X < X I - - - 95n X 9._59.3 960.6 X_ o� ���' T° ( 959.7. - T T T T T T - T T y 960 ; - - _--T- q6�- -tea' -- 800 RISER- - - I * I6^j - sem° ----- - 960 - - - - -_- ?j 1., - X961960 ;--- ----- - - - 962.1 962 1 _�- yb 1- - - --=_j------__ -_-- _ ---<------ -- - »- » - X 961.5 _ �, _ _ 962 - --- -- ---- - - - ° ) ssg-- kSr��� - - -6' ---�� �� 01.5 96,�II -a Ery. 9 E,� 4 - I I� I I 0 C, / 962 EA,0�t(`� 2,� !� q6� X 9E'2.9 _ _- - - X a63. _ oti I 0 �1 963.0 i 962 '' - I _ - 962.SX Q �' 2o��MI 1 9631 \\7 6,'62.; Lj_jI N 111 L�7�' ti - 06� ---- �-- ----- �'r`=� ' 963 -- --- -- -- -- -- mo' .0q -------- --T-' i"I x.963 -------------------- --------� 1 I. �_ 109 109 I II IIS. 9+. ).2 �6��I ACCESS DRIVE AND ACCESS DRIVE AND I61`h - _ _ _ - _ _ _ - - - I ! I 86215; \ ASSOCIATED UTILITIES TO 5 62'2 I BE INSTALLED AS PART OF ASSOCIATED UTILITIES TO o f� o ; o°- - ; ; BE INSTALLED AS PART OF W 862 I' / ab BUILDING B QO I ;; 61.9 PHASE 1 IMPROVEMENTS 8215 I� BUILDING �g62 6,976 SF I it I ISI PHASE 1 IMPROVEMENTS I I; 6, 9 7 F � I 963.1 X\ O I I ; ; I I ;' \\ I / X 964.2 \ I FFE=963.50 \ I I I o I' / \ W X '9 6� FFE=963. II � I \ I 1 _ \_x i I ' 16 I X 61; \ 6�j� \1 i 96,,. \ X961.9962.0 uuo0 oOoOo'O�o�O�oI I I rn \ v u u o 0 0 0 0 0 0 'o"o o�0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N I I AA/I lit U u u-O"O-O- O" O8O"'Ogou0Uou000000000ep0 Oo o'o`o O O o-00.O,.O_O_4-O-o n _ 9''/• ' IVI IIIVVV - v -o -o -o -os o"o0 0 0 0„0♦?0„0_0_0_0_� n n � O O O O y 0 0 0 0 0 Oho n • 6'� I II O --LI E''= 9sA \ j I ° I .A° o' \\ o I I X 0 qro I I GoIf \ I 963.7X96 .5x / 1 / I 96�, -.-� I g6 I .7 1 ' 9-� '�'-' '-'-' ° I I 963 ti o .y. •>o 62 6 -96 q I •• q I I \\\ \\ \\ ) b5 964.3 I I iiiniiiiii -.4 I �����--+--� , \ I � I �P Ij� I I I co I ° I X _ 6 i u u u o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0�0 0 0 0 0„0_0_ X 9c�. ��O o O O O o O o O o 000 ,oOgoo0oo0000�0�0�0 0 0 0 090 0 o O o 0 0 ' obti I I \ u U U"O-O-O"O�O O Ou0U0 O„ ,�O O O„O,-O,.O-O.O n r OOOo0o0nonon0„O..O,.O..O.• .0.0 n !+ nK 960.94 I IX g IX96� MOW --, 9s?so' \ II I I I I 6�� LINE 11 - \-____ MOWI I I 1 II I 1.7 //X961.0 � Ix',1 \ILINE I • II �I �i i- If ' N neo n • BUILDING C BUILDING D I II I I o II � `° I�,bti�'� X961 i X 960.6 1 1 w X g X 963.9 6 9 76 SF 964.5 X I 1 1�6�, II ► 6,976 SF I II 1962 �� Il n X 960. �I 6_�6 I I I 1 i °• , I 11 ; I 1 g 1 1 I WO F =NCE FFE=963.50 FFE=963.50 964\ C96O iI1�^ \ F _---------- n - i;I1{;I1 II 109 Cn/ ' 1 ON :�T LINE 109 Og,x 9 , 111 I I CaNOi i1 1 II 1 6 5 . 963 --------------- 916 'o X9 .61 X 963_ -------------- - 9 ---- --------==\F I 1 X 963.8 I 16° 23 I 1 LO I o I tib° �\\tib° 96, l' I II }19 q6 �q6 I 62 �; } 10 - I iI i �' 1 I I I I I o s?ao } 9 ti° �o \ ?�0 9s, I� Xc X� 5�.5 1 g6�j 0 6, �� 62.3I °'`°g6ti�q6� g6ti 962 I 20 }' \ o 959.4 �\ X 963.8 I \ I ' II 962 ` o o °tip° sF_� �� �`����-_'' so'- 1! oo ,CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER +�- I� °° I `� I 5.1 FT. EAST OF LOT LINE • I 220 _ f °� -�- �_� -�� I I i / 0 i i \ I g6ti 59.0 1 \ g 963.4 �I . � r I\\ \ \ \ X X 962.7 } I 962ii I16��---------- ------------ --- - 96 ----------------... ---- - -- 963 �` I II do / I / e --- ----�` II !----------- I rl T I 1 a � , I I II 1' O \ \ 1 109 X 961.3 I I I I 1 \\ \\ \X 962.4 11 109 �� Q•�'> I I \ CHAINLINK ---�^ 9'42• �III X 961.8 61.2 X j / I I I \ FENCE + ON LOT LINE. I" �10 II / \ / 1:96ti ,o 0 1 1\ \\ oX 960.5 q6 IIS q6� BUILDING F I ;I I q62 g62� BUILDING E 976 SF `° I II I' I \ Q- 6,976 SF x 958.6 ' � 1 1 FFE=963.50 I x960.4 1 I FFE=963 I II )61. X 961.5 X 9 s Z/ 62.5014 u v u o 0 0 0 0 0 0' 'o"'o ,: o ��y�u�y�0�0 O� O�O�O�O"C} X 962.6 I �` v v u 0 O O O O`O "'O OUO-00000 000 0000000 0 0 0 �� V�n 0 00 01 I I I v u u-O-O-O-O-O"O;O"'O�'O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O_O_O-o n =�,8 cy ( . I 1 • _ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 \.9 1 I • I I M I X, 8 i °' X 958.7 MEN i MINES 9s ° ti 6 / o o ACCESS DRIVE AND 1 , 6 q `I 9O q6� �,9 do I I 11 ASSOCIATED UTILITIES TO ACCESS DRIVE AND I - - BE INSTALLED AS PART OF ASSOCIATED UTILITIES TO a9s'>o g6� ��� g6� I II'I I PHASE 1 IMPROVEMENTS BE INSTALLED AS PART OF / I_ 961.4 X 961.3 0 : I', 961 .4 PHASE 1 IMPROVEMENTS \ I1 %o - X I 06��-- 1.91 ` I o' r- --�E-9 J o o= o ,o 1 6 v u o o -o -O o O In o 0 0 0�0 0 0 0 0 0- , q v 1 0, o O"O O o O O O O O 0 0 0 0 -01=o -O n O �6�• I -t- - -- U O-O"O-O-O�O"O�O�OuO O_ 0 0 0 O O / �O"O"O�Ou0'O„O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 �O "OD O�O900000,�0„O 0 0 0 0 0 0-O.n n ss?s0 X 959.9 X_961.0 I ,I I X 961.3 (; I ;/� ii I \ �1 I;0, I X li 4D �'- I BUILDING G ���\ BUILDING H �6 = ry,�;+ 0 I 1 962.7 fi 962�o i B \I 6,976 SF x as . q6 0 I, 6, 9 76 SF / 11 I \ 111 I I I CHAINLINK --� A1962.3 s II 1 I FENCE +�- 1I \\ FFE=963.50 : ;I / FFE=963. I ''I / X960.7 A 0 30 60 90 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET SURVEY DATA SURVEY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY: MEYER ROHLIN LAND SERVICES 708 1st AVENUE NE BUFFALO, MN 55313 DATED: APRIL 18, 2017 BENCHMARK: MN/DOT GEODETIC MONUMENT "8605 S" ELEVATION = 966.55 NAVD88 DATUM PROJECT LOCATION PART OF THE SW41 AND NEj, SECTION 14 TOWNSHIP 121, RANGE 25, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA. EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 2, BLOCK 3, OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA. PROJECT PHASING TIMELINE PHASE 1 2017-2018 PHASE 2 2018-2019 PHASE 3 2020-2021 PHASE 4 2022-2023 MARKET CONDITIONS MAY RESULT IN MODIFICATION OF PHASING TIMELINE AND PHASING OF SITE IMPROVEMENTS 0.5 FT. WEST II I \ IIt I \ 109 I OF LOT LINE. II 1 109 � ° � 162..30,--- --- f � o 9fi3 1 ` 00) , ', 1.46-- ---------' ----- -- ' 6, �-- --------- 0Ei� 01 2 I ' i /I_901.1 X 960.6 961.80 „0 6ti \ 96� I I �9 ° C 951.7 96y� °tip ?2 I I I 9s o o c 9 X\`. 5 \ o X 962.4 1 �- 962 -� /_9 'ss '�co`� j 6 1 _ ra ' 1 ------------- L° 962.6xq----------- 0) o 962.9X 962 9 J F 960.959 So 0 LANDSCAPE �I 1 960.959 x 152.0 958 \ +9 I \ \11 �( /// 958 ! 957- s� \ s0---EDGING/MULCH \) /l I I c�/ 856 957 �� , 3�1 \ 956 so I S°861 -_ CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER + - /� so 962.2 \ _ 9s1 \ �/ X- 96 X961.8 \ sol / 5.8 FT. EAST OF LOT LINE 967.2 X «' ; / \ - J-956, '�0 9 0 : - SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER +�- lit\ -_- 958956 957 f� `_ \` XQ6� �.958957 ''so Imo\ I 1/4 OF SECTION 14, T. 121, R. 25 0.4 FT. WEST OF LOT CORNER I �T'r T'�. 959 _ 960 959 ' ` ��L� _ 1 N 89°14'00" E 11^ \ 960 ^ - x 9n3.4 GG1-------------- ---- ----- ------ N 89°14 00 - --- ' 001-_ -------- -_ ------ _ ------ _ ----r 3123 56 -- a - 962 _�--------- =Lys -psi iv �(yuci' E -1 - i - - ---- y 962 ,o ------ - 9642X -- 963 o°o° ------------------------ -------------------- x ���9j-=Lam'--LKS- X- © / �;--X961.3 _----963.7 i' o-cOo°o as> 6�3 - _ - - - \ / o o°o 3 MOW-, --o o °aQa°o°o°_�- R --- --- -------961- _�� .o o �� _,.6 Z' M- - \�TC 958.96 - �- - - - - - - �� -SHED \962- _-;,- 6 INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: - - LINE -e 1,--96 0-�\�� ,t 958.9 --- _-- �� I -i X961.6g61 60- X CIO SP `\�� CURB X. I - - `-_9 ANDSCAPE2 CO PROJECT LOCATION PLAN X \959 �`�� STOP 960.5 I --TEL. _X X �\ RISER EDGING/MULCH C1 SITE PLAN �lb LANDSCAPE-I'GOLDEN EAGLE ROADOF OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL C2 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN h�1 �CB _ � SOUTH LINE OF THE PLAT �h EDGING/ROCK ELEV.=958.16 r-------r- SHRUBS 1 '-------PARK (DOC.# 275353) AS MONUMENTED; ALSO C3 SANITARY AND WATER UTILITY PLAN &� SAN MH X I NORTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF KLEIN FARMS I I I C4 STORM SEWER UTILITY PLAN ELEV.-958.59--�,958.7 �� I ESTATES 2ND ADDITION (DOC.# 753470) I I I C5 LANDSCAPE PLAN C6 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C7 EXISTING CONDITIONS AND REMOVALS PLAN Ga I I I I I I I C8 DETAILS I I/ JI F__I n I I F__n F -)A ,h �` F �` _T_n I�� �` �h� n I I� A n� I _T_I /� N I I I I I C9 PHASING PLAN w � ct kr) W 0 kr) O M •� ct N On WO� ~ c, N w ( p L Q cj� Lo -+_j W p Zi CL Ld Ow= .v o CL CL 00 o0 u J co a o -;I- No) N co (o N lb � '2 >, Lo E a o "W W Lj ' °coin I o V U Oc) Lo §�� U �-6"oo tiw'�x I a� cE a2i mm L O O `� o, oma c ,� � Li o ma ai 3 o 4 j - C 00 o t o ° V I �� �a� , 1 cl J Q IZ c Z m 2 O 3 Q Q O Q: 4z o 2 O FILE NO. 00633 C9 Phasinq Plan 0 o ti 0 m Q o W a W v v FILE NO. 00633 C9 Phasinq Plan TRUSS BRNG. ELEV. 109'-0" TRUSS BRNG. ELEV. 116'-O" STEEL SIDING COLOR "A' TRUSS BRN�. ELEV. 109'- " CORNER TRIM FIN. FLOOR ELEV. 100'-0" CULTURED STONE PROVIDED ON NOi OF NORTH BUIDINC SOUTH WALL OF SOUTH BUILDINGS ONLY WOOD POST W/ METAL WRAP 3C,4LE: 1/8" = 1'-O" TRUSS BRNG. ELEV. 116'-O" EEL SIDING COLOR "A" CORNER TRIM STEEL SIDING COLOR "B" FIN. FLOOR ELEV. 100'-O" TRUSS BRNG. ELEV. 116'-O" STEEL SIDING COLOR "f CORNER TRIM STEEL SIDING COLOR "B" ,AFIN. FLOOR ELEV. 100'-0" METAL WRAP j C ,4 L: I/ 8 = I'— V ,JbTRUSS BRNG. ELEV. 116'-O" STEEL SIDING COLOR " CORNER TRIM STEEL SIDING COLOR "B" �JhFIN. FLOOR ELEV. 100'-0" SCALE: 1/8" = I' -U" METAL WRAP TRUSS BRNG. ELEV. 109'-O" F�E,4R ELEV/4T10N SC,4LE: 1/8" = 1'-O" fv � I.I.I N w ZH GJ s s z CK m 0 m w F ro,leat No. °2 1,101,91 0 C Iasue Dzte ?-?? J C oc iment S t: V???? 0 w 0 J d TRUSS BRNG. ELEV. 116'-0" STEEL SIDING COLOR "A" TRUSS BRNG. ELEV. 109'-0" CORNER TRIM 10• I AFIN. FLOOR ELEV. 100'-0" CULTURED STONE PROVIDED ON NORTH WALL OF NORTH BUIDINGS AND SOUTH WALL OF SOUTH BUILDINGS ONLY TRUSS BRN� ELEV. 116'- -- 2 1:2 12 STEEL SHAKE SIDING WOOD POST W/ METAL WRAP TRUSS BRNG. ELEV. 116'-0" FfP,,0 NT ELE\/� SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 12 / TION �i STEEL SIDING COLOR "A" STEEL SIDING COLOR "A" TRUSS BRNGG,-NP�I ELEV. 109'- b ------- CORNER TRIM CORNER TRIM ,,—STEEL SIDING COLOR "B" STEEL SIDING COLOR "B" FIN. FLOOR FIN. FLOOR ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------- ------ ELEV. 100'-0" ELEV. 100'-0" SIEDE ELEVATION SIIDE ELEV74TION WOOD POST SCALE: 1/8„ , „ „ , = I O SCALE: 1/8 = 1'-0” „ 4:: TRUSS BRNG. ELEV. 116'-0" J STEEL SIDING COLOR "A" } CORNER TRIM i STEEL SIDING COLOR "B" q FIN. FLOOR ELEV. 100'-0" _= awi WOOD POST W/ METAL WRAP RE,,4R ELE\/�TI0N SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 4:1: TRUSS BRNG ELEV. 109'- ■ 0 ■ z s U z rn, i�Ti •7R���� I'10i9 0 C Issue Otte; w ??-;?-?? C oc ime nt S t: ■ ■ �i J_ r � Z --I ■ 0 ■ z s U z rn, i�Ti •7R���� I'10i9 0 C Issue Otte; w ??-;?-?? C oc ime nt S t: ■ ■ �i 109'-01, 61_01; 2,_3„ 12,_6„ 3,_3„ 61_01, 6,_O„ 6,_O„ 2,_9„ 12,_6„ 2,_9„ 3,_311 12,_6„ 2'-3" 6'-O" 6'-O" 6'-6" ®EM�® 3070 I mmm mmm 3070 3070 INSUL. U L ®■® - - INSUL. - - - INSUL. - - - STEEL J x I IXI I F #� _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Iw I • Ix] 1 Ixl x Ixl I I #� IXI I I )CI I I Iw Ixl 1XI �F ° _ _ _ _ _ _ _ �lxl 1XI I ________ IXI I ?� I — 4020 `—� `I `— ----4020 �_� �t —I, I_ ABO 4020 U) ABOVE I ABOVE I I ABOVE I I I I I I U Ep � U o�c I o�c I I o�2 ODl9 9) al ��� u / \\ I I I I I I / \ � Ln y� 0 I I I I I I I I d N 3 I I X 3 I I I I I I ap I, I I I I y I I 12' x-14' O.H.D. 1 12'_x 14' O.H.D. I 12'—x 14' O.H.D. �- � I I — E +' i c p I X X I 10 v y y N I I U u' a m I m _ E Q a l y a u> m I v' Q �-N ' 7 QI y � " WHAREHOUSE WHAREHOUSE WHAREHOUSE _ $ .' _ 1 I �I y E r 8,_2,. �,_1„ 1q,_6„ �,_6„ 81_211 8,_2„ 5,_�„ 18,_O„ 1q,_6„ �,_1„ R '01 ME 73 q)57< X X m v \\ \\ aSL W 73 F O � I � 0 I n I (n (n (n x (LLJn cLU LU n cn X '.. a- a- 0- I 3070 II t INSUL. 3070 r= II - ----- --I 3070 oo I- U v' :STEEL �, IF INSL.��FNSUL. Z pv 1-- -STEEL -STEEL - \ X R-STROOM I RES fR00M RESTROQM \ X 4,-- * ------ ---' * i 3070 3070 3070 INSUL. INSUL. INSUL. STEEL STEEL STEEL L O r O - 0 — z C5.. OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE z o O ao z 4020 4020 - 4020 4040 / v / v / v_ABOVE / / �v / v 4040 / v / �v / �v ABOVE _,' �v �v / v ABOVE _1_ v / �v / �v 4040 X I I j l XI I I IXI I 1 .. � (reserved for recording information) DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (Developer Installed Improvements) SPAETH INDUSTRIAL PARK (2019-007) AGREEMENT dated 12019, by and between the CITY OF MONTICELLO, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City"), and SPAETH DEVELOPMENT, LLC, a Minnesota Limited Liability Company (the "Developer"). 1. REQUEST FOR PLAT APPROVAL. The Developer has asked the City to approve a plat and Planned Unit Development approval for SPAETHINDUSTRIAL PARK (referred to in this Contract as the "plat" and the "Development") consisting of 55,808 square feet and 4.4 acres to equal eight (8) industrial lots. The land is situated in the County of Wright, State of Minnesota, and is legally described as: Lot 2, Block 3, Oakwood Industrial Park. 2. CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL. The City hereby approves the plat on condition that the Developer enter into this Contract, furnish the security required by it, and record the plat with the 193238v4 County Recorder or Registrar of Titles within 100 days after the City Council approves the final plat or the execution of this Contract, whichever occurs later. The City hereby grants approval to the Planned Unit Development (PUD) provided the development is consistent with the conditions of this Contract and the specific City conditions, requirements and PUD flexibility as set forth in City Resolution 2017-041 and City Resolution 2017-042, adopted by the Monticello Council on July 24th, 2017, and subject to the conditions of Exhibit Z of the Staff Report attached to the Council Agenda dated June 26, 2017, as well as the conditions in Exhibit Z attached to the City Council Agenda dated May 28, 2019. 3. RIGHT TO PROCEED. Within the plat or land to be platted, the Developer may not grade or otherwise disturb the earth, remove trees, construct sewer lines, water lines, streets, utilities, public or private improvements, or any buildings until all the following conditions have been satisfied: 1) this agreement has been fully executed by both parties and filed with the City Clerk, 2) the necessary security has been received by the City, 3) the plat has been submitted to the Wright County Recorder's/Registrar's Office, and 4) the City has issued a letter that all conditions have been satisfied and that the Developer may proceed. 4. PHASED DEVELOPMENT. If this plat is a phase of a multi -phased preliminary plat, and the City may refuse to approve final plats of subsequent phases if the Developer has breached this Agreement and the breach has not been remedied. Development of subsequent phases may not proceed until the City approves Development Contracts for such phases. 5. PRELIMINARY PLAT STATUS. If this Plat is a phase of a multi -phased preliminary plat, and the preliminary plat approval for all phases not final platted shall lapse and be void unless final platted into lots and blocks, not outlots, within three (3) years after preliminary plat approval as specified by state law. 2 193238v4 6. CHANGES IN OFFICIAL CONTROLS. For two (2) years from the date of this Contract, no amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan, or official controls shall apply to or affect the use, development density, lot size, lot layout or dedications of the approved plat unless required by state or federal law or agreed to in writing by the City and the Developer. Thereafter, notwithstanding anything in this Contract to the contrary, to the full extent permitted by state law, the City may require compliance with any amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan. 7. ZONING. Except as otherwise provided herein, the subject property shall be subject to the zoning regulations for the Planned Unit Development District and the requirements and standards of the I-2 District, in effect at the time the final plat is approved. 8. CONDITION FOR SUBSEQUENT APPROVALS. No final plat for changes or amendments to this PUD Agreement shall be approved, nor shall construction commence for such additional land uses, until an amendment of the PUD Agreement is processed and approved, subject to the requirements of the Monticello Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances. 9. DEVELOPMENT PLANS. The plat shall be developed in accordance with the following plans. The plans shall not be attached to this Contract. With the exception of Plans A and B, the plans may be prepared, subject to City approval, after entering the Contract, but before commencement of any work in the plat. If the plans vary from the written terms of this Contract, the written terms shall control. The plans are: Plan A - Final Plat Plan B - Final Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan Plan C - Project Location Plan Plan D - Site Plan Plan E - Existing Conditions and Removals Plan Plan F - Sanitary and Water Utility Plan Plan G - SWPPP Plan 3 193238v4 Plan H - Details Plan Plan I - Phasing Plan Plan J - Elevations Plan Plan K - Floor Plan Plan L - Photometrics / Lighting Plan Plan M - Landscape Plan Plan O - Signage Plan Plan P — Pavement Marking Plan 10. IMPROVEMENTS. The Developer shall install and pay for the following: A. Sanitary Sewer System B. Water System C. Private Storm Sewer System D. Private Streets E. Concrete Curb and Gutter F. Street Lights G. Site Grading, Ponding, and Erosion Control H. Underground Utilities I. Setting of Iron Monuments J. Surveying and Staking The improvements shall be installed in accordance with the City subdivision ordinance; City standard specifications for utilities and street construction; and any other ordinances. The Developer shall submit plans and specifications which have been prepared by a registered professional engineer to the City for approval by the City Engineer. The City may, at the City's discretion and at the Developer's expense, have one or more City inspectors and a soil engineer inspect the work on a full or part-time basis. The Developer, its contractors and subcontractors, shall follow all written instructions received from the City's inspectors subject to Developer's plans and specifications. The Developer or his engineer shall schedule a pre -construction meeting at a mutually agreeable time at the City Council chambers with all parties 4 193238v4 concerned, including the City staff, to review the program for the construction work. Within thirty (30) days after the completion of the improvements and before the security is released, the Developer shall supply the City with a complete set of reproducible "as constructed" plans, an electronic file of the "as constructed" plans in an auto CAD.DWG file or a .DXF file, and two complete sets of blue line "as constructed" plans, all prepared in accordance with City standards. In accordance with Minnesota Statutes 505.021, the final placement of iron monuments for all lot corners must be completed before the applicable security is released. The Developer's surveyor shall also submit a written notice to the City certifying that the monuments have been installed. 11. PERMITS. The Developer shall obtain or require its contractors and subcontractors to obtain all necessary permits, including but not limited to: • Wright County for County Road Access and Work in County Rights -of -Way • Wright County Soil Conservation District • MnDot for State Highway Access • Minnesota Department of Health for Watermains • NPDES Permit for Stormwater Connections • MPCA for Sanitary Sewer and Hazardous Material Removal and Disposal • DNR for Dewatering • City of Monticello for Building Permits 12. DEWATERING. Due to the variable nature of groundwater levels and stormwater flows, it will be the Developer's and the Developer's contractors and subcontractors responsibility to satisfy themselves with regard to the elevation of groundwater in the area and the level of effort needed to perform dewatering and storm flow routing operations. All dewatering shall be in accordance with all applicable county, state, and federal rules and regulations. DNR regulations regarding appropriations permits shall also be strictly followed. 13. TIME OF PERFORMANCE. The Developer shall install all required public improvements by August 30th of the year following the year of recording of the final plat. The Developer may, however, request an extension of time from the City. If an extension is granted, it shall be 193238v4 conditioned upon updating the security posted by the Developer to reflect cost increases and the extended completion date. 14. LICENSE. The Developer hereby grants the City, its agents, employees, officers and contractors a license to enter the platted property to perform all work and inspections deemed appropriate by the City in conjunction with plat development. 15. EROSION CONTROL AND STORM WATER CONTROL. A. Prior to initiating site grading, the erosion control plan, Plans `B" and "G", shall be implemented by the Developer and inspected and approved by the City. The City may impose additional erosion control requirements if reasonably required. All areas disturbed by the excavation and backfilling operations shall restored as identified in the Construction Stormwater General Permit/SWPPP, unless authorized and approved by the City Engineer, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. Except as otherwise provided in the erosion control plan, seed shall be in accordance with the City's current seeding specification to provide a temporary ground cover as rapidly as possible. All seeded areas shall be maintained as necessary for seed retention. The parties recognize that time is of the essence in controlling erosion. If the Developer does not comply with the erosion control plan and schedule or supplementary instructions received from the City, the City may provide Developer with written notice of default. If the Developer does not cure the default within two (2) days after receipt of such notice, then the City will take such action as it deems appropriate to control erosion. The City will endeavor to notify the Developer in advance of any proposed action, but failure of the City to do so will not affect the Developer's and City's rights or obligations hereunder. If the Developer does not reimburse the City for any cost the City reasonably incurred for such work within thirty (30) days after receipt of the City's written request (which request shall include all supporting and related evidence necessary to substantiate the actual cost), the City may draw down the letter of credit to pay any reasonable and actual costs. No development, street or 6 193238v4 utility construction will be allowed unless the Plat is in full compliance with the approved erosion control plan. B. The Developer shall inspect, maintain, operate and replace in a good state of repair and safe condition all proposed drainage improvements, including, without limitation, the private storm sewer and infiltration systems on the Subject Property. Operation and maintenance shall be as provided in the recorded Stormwater Maintenance Agreement for the Subject Property. C. Operations and maintenance of the private stormwater system shall be specified within and provided for in the private covenant and association documents applicable to all lots within the development. 16. GRADING PLAN AND CERTIFICATION. The plat shall be graded in accordance with the approved grading plan, stormwater control measures and erosion control plan as set forth in Plan "B" and "G". The plan shall conform to City of Monticello specifications. Within thirty (30) days after completion of the grading and before the City approves individual building permits (except as permitted by this agreement or the Building Official), the Developer shall provide the City with an "as constructed" grading plan certified by a registered land surveyor or engineer that all ponds, swales, and ditches have been constructed on public easements or land owned by the City. Additionally, the "as constructed" grading plan will include a certification that the grading following construction activities has been undisturbed or has been returned to the state required in the grading plan. The "as constructed" plan shall include field verified elevations of the following: a) cross sections of ponds; b) location and elevations along all swales, wetlands, wetland mitigation areas if any, ditches, locations and dimensions of borrow areas/stockpiles, and installed "conservation area" posts; and c) lot corner elevations, and building pads. The City will withhold issuance of building permits until the approved certified grading plan is on file with the City and all erosion control measures are in place as determined by the City Engineer. The 7 193238v4 Developer certifies to the City that all lots with building footings placed on fill have been monitored and constructed to meet or exceed applicable specifications. 17. CLEAN UP. The Developer shall clean dirt and debris from streets that has resulted from construction work by the Developer, home builders, subcontractors, their agents or assigns. Prior to any construction in the plat, the Developer shall identify in writing a responsible party and schedule for erosion control, street cleaning, and street sweeping. The Developer shall pay a penalty of $100.00 a day for each calendar day that the streets are not cleaned in accordance with this paragraph. If the Developer repeatedly fails to clean streets in accordance with this paragraph, the City may, in its discretion, perform the work or contract to have the work completed and bill the costs to the Developer. The City will endeavor to notify the Developer in advance of any proposed action, but failure of the City to do so will not affect the Developer's and City's rights or obligations hereunder. If the Developer does not reimburse the City for any cost the City incurred for such work within ten (10) days from the date notice of the amount owed to the City is mailed, the City may draw down the Irrevocable Letter of Credit to pay any costs. No development, utility or street construction will be allowed and no building permits will be issued unless the Plat is in full compliance with the requirements of this Paragraph. 18. OWNERSHIP OF IMPROVEMENTS. A. Upon completion of the work and construction required by this Contract, the improvements lying within public easements shall become City property without further notice or action, with exception of the private streets and stormwater and stormsewer system. B. The City shall maintain the watermain and sanitary lines located within the easement in a safe and good condition, and shall maintain, operate, repair, replace and remove, if required, the watermain and sanitary sewer lines in compliance with all applicable governmental rules, regulations, and requirements. 193238v4 C. If the surface of the easement area of any portion thereof shall be disturbed by the operation, maintenance, replacement or removal activities in connection with the use of the easement, said surface and improvements shall be promptly restored by the fee owner of the easement area to their condition prior to the disturbance. 19. CITY ENGINEERING ADMINISTRATION AND CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION. A. The Developer shall pay a fee for the City's engineering administration as related to the Public Improvements. City engineering administration will include monitoring of construction observation related to Public Improvements, consultation with Developer and its engineer on status or problems regarding the project, coordination for final inspection and acceptance, project monitoring during the warranty period, and processing of requests for reduction in security. Fees for this service shall be at standard hourly rates per the City's adopted fee schedule estimated to be five percent (5.0%), of the estimated construction cost of the Public Improvements, assuming normal construction and project scheduling. Developer will provide a $7,013.50 escrow, which is separate and in addition to any other escrow funds for this Development, to pay the fees owed to the City under this Section. The Developer shall pay for construction observation performed by the City's consulting engineer. Construction observation shall include part or full time inspection of proposed public utilities and will be billed on standard hourly rates per City's adopted fee schedule. The cost of the construction observation is included in the five (5%) estimate. B. The Developer shall pay a fee for the City's engineering administration as related to grading and restoration of the Subject Property. City engineering administration will include monitoring of construction observation related to grading and restoration of the site, consultation with Developer and his engineer on status or problems regarding the project, coordination for final inspection and acceptance, 9 193238v4 and processing of requests for reduction in security. Fees for this service shall be at standard hourly rates per the City's adopted fee schedule estimated to be two percent (2.0%), of the estimated construction cost of the Subject Property grading and restoration cost, assuming normal construction and project scheduling. Developer will provide a $3,977.56 escrow, which is separate and in addition to any other escrow funds for this Development. The Developer shall pay for construction observation performed by the City's consulting engineer. Construction observation shall include part or full time inspection of proposed public utilities and will be billed on standard hourly rates per City's adopted fee schedule. C. The fees owed by the Developer to the City under this Section shall be paid from the escrows amounts. Any amounts not utilized from the escrow account shall be returned to the Developer when all the Development has been completed in accordance with this Agreement. If additional escrow amounts are required for such costs incurred beyond the escrow deposit, the Developer shall be billed directly for such costs and there shall be no issuance of occupancy permits until all such obligations have been fully paid. 20. CITY PLANNING, LEGAL AND ADMINISTRATION. A. The Developer shall submit an escrow deposit for fees for City staff administration relating to processing of the Plat and associated administration. Fees for this service shall be at standard hourly rates per the City's adopted fee schedule estimated to be two percent (2.0%), or $2,000 minimum, of the estimated construction cost of the Public Improvements, assuming normal construction and project scheduling. Developer will provide a $2,805.40 escrow, which is separate and in addition to any other escrow funds for this Development. This amount is subject to reconciliation based on actual costs at the completion of the project. B. The Developer shall submit an escrow deposit for fees relating to City planning -related expenses associated with the Plat development. Fees for this service shall be at standard hourly rates per the City's adopted fee schedule estimated to be two percent (2.0%), or $2,000 minimum, of the estimated 10 193238v4 construction cost of the Public Improvements, assuming normal construction and project scheduling. Developer will provide a $2,805.40 escrow, which is separate and in addition to any other escrow funds for this Development. This amount is subject to reconciliation based on actual costs at the completion of the project. C. The Developer shall submit an escrow deposit for fees relating to City legal -related expenses associated with the Plat development. Fees for this service shall be at standard hourly rates per the City's adopted fee schedule estimated to be two percent (2.0%), or $2,000 minimum, of the estimated construction cost of the Public Improvements, assuming normal construction and project scheduling. Developer will provide a $2,805.40 escrow, which is separate and in addition to any other escrow funds for this Development. This amount is subject to reconciliation based on actual costs at the completion of the project. D. The fees owed by the Developer to the City under this Section shall be paid from the escrows amounts. Any amounts not utilized from the escrow account shall be returned to the Developer when all the Development has been completed in accordance with this Agreement. If additional escrow amounts are required for such costs incurred beyond the escrow deposit, the Developer shall be billed directly for such costs and there shall be no issuance of occupancy permits until all such obligations have been fully paid. 21. CLAIMS. In the event that the City receives claims from labor, materialmen, or others that work required by this Contract has been performed, the sums due them have not been paid, and the laborers, materialmen, or others are seeking payment from the City, the Developer hereby authorizes the City to commence an Interpleader action pursuant to Rule 22, Minnesota Rules of Civil Procedure for the District Courts, to draw upon the letters of credit in an amount up to 125 percent of the claim(s) and deposit the funds in compliance with the Rule, and upon such deposit, the Developer shall release, 11 193238v4 discharge, and dismiss the City from any further proceedings as it pertains to the letters of credit deposited with the District Court, except that the Court shall retain jurisdiction to determine attorneys' fees pursuant to this Contract. 22. STORM SEWER AREA CHARGE. The Development is subject to a total storm sewer area charge of $46,738.48. The area charge is based on the gross area of the final plat less any area credit for pond area, and is calculated as follows: BASE STORM SEWER AREA CHARGE 3.88 acres x $3,543/net acre = $13,746.84 ALTERNATE STORM SEWER ARE CHARGE 3.88 acres x $8,503/net acre = $32,991.64 The total storm sewer area charge for the Development of $46,738.48 shall be apportioned equally to each lot of the final plat and assessed against each property if not paid by the Developer in cash at the time of final plat approval at developer's option. If assessed, an interest rate of 1.5% per annum over the prime interest rate as published in the Wall Street Journal shall apply. [See Paragraph 30(D).] 23. SANITARY SEWER AREA CHARGE. The Development is subject to a sanitary sewer area charge of $14,590.40. The area charge is based on the gross area of the final plat and is calculated as follows: 4.4 acres x $3,316/acre = $14,590.40 The Developer shall be assessed or shall pay the sanitary sewer area charge in cash at the time of final plat approval at developer's option. The amount of the area charge shall be apportioned equally to each lot of the final plat and assessed against each property if not paid by the Developer in cash at the time of final plat approval at developer's option. If assessed, an interest rate of 1.5% per annum over the prime interest rate as published in the Wall Street Journal % shall apply. [See Paragraph 30(D).] 12 193238v4 24. WATER MAIN AREA CHARGE. The Development is subject to a water main area charge of $10,788.80. The area charge is based on the gross area of the final plat and is calculated as follows: 4.4 acres x $2,452/acre = $10,788.80 The Developer shall be assessed or shall pay the sanitary sewer area charge in cash at the time of final plat approval at developer's option. The amount of the area charge shall be apportioned equally to each lot of the final plat and assessed against each property if not paid by the Developer in cash at the time of final plat approval at developer's option. If assessed, an interest rate of 1.5% per annum over the prime interest rate as published in the Wall Street Journal shall apply. [See Paragraph 30(D).] 25. PARK DEDICATION AND TRAILS. Not applicable. 26. SPECIAL PROVISIONS. The following special provisions shall apply to plat development: A. Implementation of the recommendations listed in the Monticello Resolution No. 2017-0, dated May 31, 2017. B. Implementation of the recommendations listed in the Monticello Resolution No. PC -2019-011, dated May 7, 2019. C. Developer's PUD shall comply with the proposed definition and performance standards for Industrial Self Storage uses. Each individual Industrial Self Storage unit shall be authorized by a Conditional Use Permit issued by the City. D. Developer shall prepare a sign plan and updated site plan compliant with the City Ordinance as part of the final stage PUD review. E. Developer will work with the City to maintain drainage and erosion control, as well as paved access and parking for constructed buildings. Paving beyond the internal lot lines of individual 13 193238v4 buildings may be required to maintain access and drainage, with the limits of the City approved PUD site plan. Developer may phase pavement improvements with City's approval. F. Developer shall prepare cross -access and parking easements with maintenance, covenants and improvements to ensure continued accessibility and operation. Said easements and declarations are subject to review and approval by the City. G. Developer shall verify internal trash handling equipment, and prohibit outdoor storage as a part of the project PUD approvals. H. Developer shall coordinate addressing and mailbox installations with City Building and Streets departments. I. The Developer shall post a $2,400.00 security for the final placement of interior subdivision iron monuments at property corners. The security was calculated as follows: 8 units at $300.00 per unit. The security will be held by the City until the Developer's land surveyor certifies that all irons have been set following site grading and utility and street construction. The Developer is required to submit the final plat in electronic format. The electronic format shall be either AutoCAD.DWG file or a .DXF file. All construction record drawings (e.g., grading, utilities, and streets) shall be in electronic format in accordance with standard City specifications. The Developer shall also submit one complete set of reproducible construction plans on Mylar. 27. SUMMARY OF SECURITY REQUIREMENTS. A. To guarantee compliance with the terms of this Contract, payment of real estate taxes including interest and penalties, payment of special assessments, payment of the costs of all public improvements, and construction of all public improvements, the Developer shall furnish the City with a letter of credit, in the form attached hereto, from a bank ("security") for $178,337.50, plus a cash fee of 14 193238v4 $19,887.00 for City engineering, expenses and administration and planning, legal and City administration expenses. The amount of the security was calculated as follows: CONSTRUCTION COSTS: Sanitary Sewer & Watermain Storm Sewer/Draintile/Infiltration Basin Internal Streets CONSTRUCTION SUB -TOTAL (ESTIMATED) OTHER COSTS: Lot Corners/Iron Monuments TOTAL COSTS TOTAL CONSTRUCTION SECURITIES: Total Costs X 125% $140,270 $N/A $N/A $.00 $ 00.00 $2,400.00 $142,670.00 $178,337.50 This breakdown is for historical reference; it is not a restriction on the use of the security. The bank shall be subject to the approval of the City Administrator. The security shall be for a term ending when maintenance bond is posted. Individual security instruments may be for shorter terms provided they are automatically renewed on an annual basis until expiration. The City may draw down the security with 30 days written notice to Developer, for any violation of the terms of this Contract or if the security is allowed to lapse prior to the end of the required term. If the required public improvements are not completed at least thirty (30) days prior to the renewal of the security, the City may also draw it down. If the security is drawn down, the proceeds shall be used to cure the default. Upon receipt of proof satisfactory to the City that work has been completed and financial obligations to the City have been satisfied, with City approval the security may be reduced from time to time by ninety percent (90%) of the financial obligations that have been satisfied. Ten percent (10%) of the amounts certified by the Developer's engineer shall be retained as security until all improvements have been completed, all financial obligations to the City satisfied, the required "as constructed" plans have been received by the 15 193238v4 City, a warranty security is provided, and the public improvements are accepted by the City Council. The City standard specifications for utilities and street construction outline procedures for security reductions. B. The Developer shall also furnish the City with a Security for $13,200.00 for grading in compliance with approved Plan "B". This amount was calculated as follows. $3,000/acre X 4.4 acres = $13,200.00 C. The Developer shall furnish the City with Security for 538,800.00 to guarantee the completion of Subject Property landscaping improvements in compliance with approved Plan "O". This amount was calculated based on the Developer's estimate of Subject Property landscaping plan installation costs. 28. SUMMARY OF CASH REQUIREMENTS. The following is a summary of the cash requirements under this Contract which must be furnished to the City prior to the time of final plat approval: Legal $ 2,805.40 Planning $ 2,805.40 Engineering Administration, Inspection $ 7,013.50 Engineering (grading) $ 3,977.56 Administrative Escrow for City Administration $ 2,805.40 GPS Locate Fee $ 480.00 Total Cash Requirements $19,887.26 * Fees reconciled to actual expenses at close of project. 29. WARRANTY. The Developer warrants all improvements required to be constructed by it pursuant to this Contract against poor material and faulty workmanship. The warranty period for underground utilities is two years and shall commence following completion and acceptance by City Council. The Developer or its Contractors shall post maintenance bonds in the amount of twenty-five percent (25%) of final certified construction costs to secure the warranties. Maintenance Bonds of the 16 193238v4 prime contractor may be accepted subject to City approval. The City shall retain ten percent (10%) of the security posted by the Developer until the maintenance bonds are furnished the City or until the warranty period expires, whichever first occurs. The retainage may be used to pay for warranty work. 30. RESPONSIBILITY FOR COSTS. A. Except as otherwise specified herein, the Developer shall pay all actual costs incurred by it or the City in conjunction with the development of the plat, including but not limited to, legal, planning, engineering and inspection expenses incurred in connection with approval and acceptance of the plat, the preparation of this Contract, review of construction plans and documents, and all costs and expenses incurred by the City in monitoring and inspecting development of the plat. The Developer shall deposit with the City the amount set forth in Section 28 to be used for the payment of these fees and enforcement fees. If the amount in the deposit account drops below 15% of the initial amount, the Developer will make additional deposits in amounts set by the City. At the completion of the project and following payment of all expenses related to the project, the City shall return the remaining deposit funds to the Developer. B. The Developer shall hold the City and its officers, employees, and agents harmless from claims made by it and third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred resulting from plat approval and development. The Developer shall indemnify the City and its officers, employees, and agents for all costs, damages, or expenses which the City may pay or incur in consequence of such claims, including reasonable attorneys' fees and costs. C. The Developer shall reimburse the City for costs incurred in the enforcement of this Contract, including engineering and attorneys' fees. D. The Developer shall pay, or cause to be paid when due, and in any event before any penalty is attached, all special assessments referred to in this Agreement. This is an obligation of the 17 193238v4 Developer and shall continue in full force and effect even if the Developer sells a part or parts of the platted land. The charges set forth in Paragraphs 22, 23, 24, supra., are summarized as follows: Storm Sewer: $46,738.48 Sanitary Sewer: $14,590.40 Watermain: $10,788.80 TOTAL: $72,117.68 The $72,117.88 shall be apportioned across the 8 units of the Development, with each unit being assigned an assessment of $9,014.71. Developer waives the right to contest these assessments. This assessment shall be payable over a five year period, in five equal installments, plus interest of 1.5% over prime as published in the Wall Street Journal at the time of assessment per annum on the remaining principal balance each year. Interest will begin to accrue on the principal balance commencing on the date of final plat approval by the City of Monticello. E. The Developer shall pay in full all bills submitted to it by the City for obligations incurred under this Contract within thirty (30) days after receipt. If the bills are not paid on time, the City may halt plat development and construction until the bills are paid in full. Bills not paid within thirty (30) days shall accrue interest at the rate of eighteen percent (18%) per year. F. In addition to the charges and special assessments referred to herein, other charges and special assessments may be imposed such as but not limited to sewer availability charges ("SAC"), water availability charges ("WAC"), City water connection charges, City sewer connection charges, and building permit fees. 31. DEVELOPER'S DEFAULT. In the event of default by the Developer as to any of the work to be performed by it hereunder, the City may, at its option, perform the work and the Developer shall promptly reimburse the City for any expense incurred by the City, provided the Developer, except in 18 193238v4 an emergency as determined by the City, is first given notice of the work in default, not less than forty- eight (48) hours in advance. This Contract is a license for the City to act, and it shall not be necessary for the City to seek a Court order for permission to enter the land. When the City does any such work, the City may, in addition to its other remedies, assess the cost in whole or in part. 32. MISCELLANEOUS. A. The Developer represents to the City that the plat complies with all city, county, metropolitan, state, and federal laws and regulations, including but not limited to: subdivision ordinances, zoning ordinances, and environmental regulations. If the plat ceases to comply with county, metropolitan, state and federal laws and regulations, the City may, at its option, refuse to allow construction or development work in the plat until the Developer does comply. Upon the City's demand, the Developer shall cease work until there is compliance. B. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City under this Contract. C. Breach of the terms of this Contract by the Developer shall be grounds for denial of building permits, including lots sold to third parties. D. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase of this Contract is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Contract. E. If building permits are issued prior to the acceptance of public improvements, the Developer assumes all liability and costs resulting in delays in completion of public improvements and damage to public improvements caused by the City, Developer, its contractors, subcontractors, material men, employees, agents, or third parties. No sewer and water connection permits may be issued and no one may occupy a building for which a building permit is issued on either a temporary or permanent basis 19 193238v4 until the streets needed for access have been paved with a bituminous surface and the utilities are accepted by the City Engineer. F. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this Contract. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Contract shall not be a waiver or release. G. This Contract shall run with the land and may be recorded against the title to the property. The Developer covenants with the City, its successors and assigns, that the Developer is well seized in fee title of the property being final platted and/or has obtained consents to this Contract, in the form attached hereto, from all parties who have an interest in the property; that there are no unrecorded interests in the property being final platted; and that the Developer will indemnify and hold the City harmless for any breach of the foregoing covenants. H. Developer or its prime contractor shall take out and maintain or cause to be taken out and maintained until six (6) month after the City has accepted the public improvements, public liability and property damage insurance covering personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage which may arise out of Developer's work or the work of its subcontractors or by one directly or indirectly employed by any of them. Limits for bodily injury and death shall be not less than $500,000 for one person and $1,000,000 for each occurrence; limits for property damage shall be not less than $200,000 for each occurrence; or a combination single limit policy of $1,000,000 or more. The City shall be named as an additional insured on the policy, and the Developer shall file with the City a certificate evidencing coverage prior to the City signing the plat or when any construction commences, whichever later occurs. The certificate shall provide that the City must be given ten (10) days advance written notice of the cancellation of the insurance. 20 193238v4 I. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in addition to every other right, power or remedy, express or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to City, at law or in equity, or under any other agreement, and each and every right, power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy. The Developer may not assign this Contract without the written permission of the City Council, unless such assignment is to a principal of Developer or another entity in which the Developer is a principal. The Developer's obligation hereunder shall continue in full force and effect even if the Developer sells part or parts of the platted land, until all conditions of assignment are met. 33. NOTICES. Required notices to the Developer shall be in writing, and shall be either hand delivered to the Developer, its employees or agents, or mailed to the Developer by certified mail at the following address: Spaeth Development, LLC, 108 Meadowlark Road SE, St. Michael, Minnesota 55376. Notices to the City shall be in writing and shall be either hand delivered to the City Administrator, or mailed to the City by certified mail in care of the City Administrator at the following address: Monticello City Hall, 505 Walnut Street, Monticello, Minnesota 55362, with a copy to the City Attorney by regular mail at: Campbell Knutson, P.A., Grand Oak Office Center I, 860 Blue Gentian Road, #290, Eagan, Minnesota 55121. Remainder ofpage intentionally left blank. Signatures on the following pages. 21 193238v4 CITY OF MONTICELLO Lo (SEAL) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF WRIGHT ) Brian Stumpf, Mayor Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2019, by Brian Stumpf and by Jeff O'Neill, respectively the Mayor and City Administrator of the City of Monticello, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. Notary Public Campbell Knutson Professional Association Grand oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, #290 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (651) 452-5000 JJJ 22 193238v4 DEVELOPER: SPAETH DEVELOPMENT, LLC Lo STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF WRIGHT ) Kenneth Spaeth, Its President The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2019, by Kenneth J. Spaeth, the President of Spaeth Development, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the entity. Notary Public DRAFTED BY: Campbell Knutson Professional Association Grand oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, #290 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (651) 452-5000 JJJ 23 193238v4 MORTGAGE HOLDER CONSENT TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT , which holds a mortgage on the subject property, the development of which is governed by the foregoing Development Contract, which mortgage is dated and recorded with the Wright County Recorder as document number , agrees that the Development Contract shall remain in full force and effect even if it forecloses on its mortgage. Dated this day of , 2019. By Its By Its STATE OF ) ( ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this and and DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL, KNUTSON Professional Association Grand Oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (651) 452-5000 JJJ of on behalf of the Notary Public day of , 2019, by , respectively the ,a 24 193238v4 FEE OWNER CONSENT TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT KENNETH J. SPAETH and THERESA L. SPAETH, fee owners of all or part of the subject property, the development of which is governed by the foregoing Development Contract, affirm and consent to the provisions thereof and agree to be bound by the provisions as the same may apply to that portion of the subject property owned by them. Dated this day of , 2019. Kenneth J. Spaeth Theresa L. Spaeth STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2019, by Kenneth J. Spaeth and Theresa L. Spaeth, husband and wife. Notary Public DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL, KNUTSON Professional Association Grand Oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (651) 452-5000 JJJ 25 193238v4 IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT No. Date: TO: City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street Monticello, Minnesota 55362 Dear Sir or Madam: We hereby issue, for the account of (Name of Developer) and in your favor, our Irrevocable Letter of Credit in the amount of $ , available to you by your draft drawn on sight on the undersigned bank. The draft must: a) Bear the clause, 'Drawn under Letter of Credit No. , dated , 2 , of (Name of Bank) it, b) Be signed by the Mayor or City Administrator of the City of Monticello. c) Be presented for payment at (Address of Bank) . on or before 4:00 p.m. on November 30, 2007. This Letter of Credit shall automatically renew for successive one-year terms unless, at least forty-five (45) days prior to the next annual renewal date (which shall be November 30 of each year), the Bank delivers written notice to the Monticello City Administrator that it intends to modify the terms of, or cancel, this Letter of Credit. Written notice is effective if sent by certified mail, postage prepaid, and deposited in the U.S. Mail, at least forty- five (45) days prior to the next annual renewal date addressed as follows: Monticello City Administrator, Monticello City Hall, 505 Walnut Street, Monticello, MN 55362, and is actually received by the City Administrator at least thirty (30) days prior to the renewal date. This Letter of Credit sets forth in full our understanding which shall not in any way be modified, amended, amplified, or limited by reference to any document, instrument, or agreement, whether or not referred to herein. This Letter of Credit is not assignable. This is not a Notation Letter of Credit. More than one draw may be made under this Letter of Credit. This Letter of Credit shall be governed by the most recent revision of the Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits, International Chamber of Commerce Publication No. 600. We hereby agree that a draft drawn under and in compliance with this Letter of Credit shall be duly honored upon presentation. Law Its 26 193238v4 CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE PROJECT: CERTIFICATE HOLDER: City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street Monticello, Minnesota 55362 INSURED: ADDITIONAL INSURED: City of Monticello AGENT: WORKERS' COMPENSATION: Policy No. Effective Date: Expiration Date: Insurance Company: COVERAGE - Workers' Compensation, Statutory. GENERAL LIABILITY: Policy No. Effective Date: Expiration Date: Insurance Company: () Claims Made () Occurrence LIMITS: [Minimum] Bodily Injury and Death: $500,000 for one person $1,000,000 for each occurrence Property Damage: $200,000 for each occurrence -OR- Combination Single Limit Policy $1,000,000 or more COVERAGE PROVIDED: Operations of Contractor: YES Operations of Sub -Contractor (Contingent): YES Does Personal Injury Include Claims Related to Employment? YES 27 193238v4 Completed Operations/Products: YES Contractual Liability (Broad Form): YES Governmental Immunity is Waived: YES Property Damage Liability Includes: Damage Due to Blasting YES Damage Due to Collapse YES Damage Due to Underground Facilities YES Broad Form Property Damage YES AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY: Policy No. Effective Date: Insurance Company: (X) Any Auto LIMITS: [Minimum] Bodily Injury: $500,000 each person Property Damage: $500,000 each occurrence -OR- Combined Single Limit Policy Expiration Date: $1,000,000 each occurrence $1,000,000 each occurrence ARE ANY DEDUCTIBLES APPLICABLE TO BODILY INJURY OR PROPERTY DAMAGE ON ANY OF THE ABOVE COVERAGES: If so, list: Amount: $ [Not to exceed $1,000.00] SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL MAIL TEN (10) DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE PARTIES TO WHOM THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED. Dated at On BY: Authorized Insurance Representative 28 193238v4 City Council Agenda: 05/28/2019 2M. Consideration to acknowledge receipt of an amended petition for annexation from Ronald Denn, General Partner, Denn Familv Properties, LP and Ronald and Lisa Denn and to proceed to verification of compliance with the Joint Resolution for Orderlv Annexation. (AS/JS) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The City Council is asked to review for acknowledgement the receipt of an amended petition for annexation of four parcels located within the Monticello Orderly Annexation Area. It was determined that the property lines were incorrect and, therefore, their initial petition for annexation could not be accepted. After review by court, the discrepancy of property lines has been resolved. The applicants received a judge's order regarding the legal description and boundary. As required the current boundary exhibit, legal description and title commitment for the property to be annexed all match. The City will not consider adoption of a resolution for annexation of petitioned parcels until such time as the City has determined compliance with the terms of the Joint Resolution for Orderly Annexation between the City of Monticello and Monticello Township. The annexation request will be reviewed and processed in accordance with the provisions of the approved annexation agreement. The four parcels, contiguous to one another, are also contiguous to the current municipal boundary. The parcels touch the east and south boundaries of the Hunters Crossing plat. The four parcels lie completely within the Monticello Orderly Annexation Area and the petition has been signed by 100% of the property owners of the four parcels. The annexation agreement requires that the City serve the proposed parcels, which are guided residential and urban reserve within the Comprehensive Plan, with municipal utilities within three years. As such, platting of the parcels will provide the information necessary to determine utility service and connections for the proposed area. As required by the Joint Resolution for Orderly Annexation, the City provided notice to the Township. Land use and plat applications for the area petitioned for annexation may be submitted to the City for consideration following the acknowledgement of the petition by the City Council. Final consideration of a resolution for annexation will be considered concurrently with final platting and development related approvals. Council is only asked to recognize the receipt of the petition as a means to allow the required platting, land use and environmental processes to be undertaken and reviewed by the City as the responsible local government unit. Al. Staff Impact: Consideration of the petition for preparation of this report has involved the review of the City Clerk, Community Development Director and City Attorney, estimated at 4 hours total. A2. Budget Impact: Minimal at this time. There is no fee to petition for annexation. A3. Strategic Plan Impact: Impact on strategic planning will be evaluated as part of the larger plat and development analysis forthcoming. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to acknowledge receipt of an amended petition for annexation from Ronald Denn, City Council Agenda: 05/28/2019 General Partner, Denn Family Properties, LP and Ronald and Lisa Denn and to proceed to verification of compliance with Joint Resolution for Orderly Annexation. 2. Motion to reject an amended petition for annexation from Ronald Denn, General Partner, Denn Family Properties, LP and Ronald and Lisa Denn and not proceed at this time to verification of compliance with Joint Resolution for Orderly Annexation. 3. Motion to table acknowledgment of a receipt of an amended petition for annexation from Ronald Denn, General Partner, Denn Family Properties, LP and Ronald and Lisa Denn and table action for verification of compliance with Joint Resolution for Orderly Annexation. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative #1. The acknowledgement is necessary to allow a developer, with the petitioner's signature, to proceed with a request to the City for platting, land use and environmental processes and to allow the City to verify compliance with the terms of the Joint Resolution for Orderly Annexation. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Petition for Annexation B. Subject Parcel Exhibit C. Memo — City of Monticello Annexation Review Process D. Joint Resolution for Orderly Annexation E. OAA Boundary Map 2 CITY OF Monticello CITY OF MONTICELLO PETITION FOR ANNEXATION Property Owner Name(s): Ronald and Lisa Denn & Denn Family Limited Partnership, LLC Property PID(s): 213-100-234102, 213-100-242200, 213-100-251200, 213-100-234101 CONTACT INFORMATION E C ISOV71 Name: Ronald Denn Mailing Address: 8410 Eisele Ave NE 2019 City/St/Zip: Monticello, MN 55362 Phone: Ron 612-423-0562 Email: rcdenn2016(_a,amail.com; Lisa . _ Lisa 612-328-7612 To the Council of the City of Monticello, Wright County, Minnesota: I, the undersigned, the owner of the property described below, hereby request the City Council of the Monticello, Minnesota, to annex this area to the city and to extend the city boundaries to include the same, and for that purpose respectfully state: 1. The area to be annexed consists of aivrox. 217 acres. All of this land lies entirely within the County of Wright, Minnesota, and the official legal description of such land is as follows (or attach): See attached 2. The area described above abuts upon the city limits at the north (85th St & Fallon Ave) boundary thereof, and none of it is presently included within the corporate limits of any incorporated city. 3. All of this area is contained within the Monticello Orderly Annexation Area and/or is about to become urban or suburban in character. PROPERTY OWNER(S): <-15-u�I9 "(�'. r Date Signature jr— X ", —M " Date Signature Title lin Title Electronically Served 4/30/2019 10:10 AM Wright County, MN STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF WRIGHT 86 -CV -19-65 Filed in District Court State of Minnesota Apr 29 2019 9:54 AM Denn Family Limited Partnership, a Minnesota limited partnership Plaintiff, VS. Mark J. Holker, First Minnesota Bank, United States of America, through Farm Service Agency, United States Department of Agriculture, Thomas R. Collins, Kathryn L. Collins, Robert M. Collins, Jane C. Cornelius and Shannon Leah Bye, also all other persons or entities who claim any right, title, estate, lien or other interest in the real estate described herein, Defendants. DISTRICT COURT TENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT Other Civil/Quiet Title Hon. Geoffrey W. Tenney Court File No. 86 -CV -19-65 FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND ORDER FOR JUDGMENT The above -entitled matter came on for hearing before The Honorable Geoffrey W. Tenney, Judge of the above-named Court, at the Wright County Courthouse in the City of Buffalo, Minnesota, on the 29`h day of April, 2019; Karen M. Kurth appeared for the Plaintiffs and there was no appearance on the part of the Defendants. It appearing by the Affidavit and from the files herein that the Summons, Complaint and Amended Complaint were duly served upon each and all of the Defendants herein as provided by law; that more than twenty (20) days have elapsed since the service of said Summons; that none of the said Defendants have answered or defended in said action with the exception of the following: 86 -CV -19-65 a. Mark J. Holker appeared through his attorney Kody Holker in telephone conversations with Plaintiff's attorney, Charles M. Seykora, and agreed not to answer in this matter if Plaintiffs provided a Quit Claim Deed to Mark J. Holker for his legal description 86LV-19-65 consistent with the legal description of the Property in the Amended Complaint. This original deed was provided to attorney Holker; b. Thomas R. Collins, Kathryn L. Collins and Robert M. Collins, by their attorney John Peterson of Johnson, Larson and Peterson, appeared through email and telephone correspondence with attorney Charles M. Seykora, and agreed not to file an answer in this matter if Plaintiffs provided them with an updated survey and a quit claim deed to their property which matched the legal description of the Plaintiff's Property described in the Amended Complaint. This original deed and survey was provided to attorney Peterson; c. Jane Cornelius appeared by her attorney Douglas Schroeppel of Schroeppel and Schroeppel in telephone conversations with attorney Seykora, and agreed that she would not file an answer since the legal description of the Plaintiffs' Property as described in the Amended Complaint did not affect any of the Cornelius property; d. Shannon Bye appeared through email communications with attorney Seykora, and agreed that she would not file an answer if she received a deed for a sliver of land between her torrens property and the JLM marking her property. Plaintiff has executed the deed to Shannon Bye for this sliver of real property. The sliver of property is the legal description for Parcel 4 in this Quiet Title Action. Shannon Bye executed a form from the Wright County Auditor/Treasurer's Office allowing the combining of real estate parcels. Attorney Seykora will record same to resolve boundary issue after filing 2 86 -CV -19-65 of order in this court proceeding. The Amended Complaint has no effect on the Bye property since it only affected the legal descriptions of the Denn, Collins, Holker and Cornelius properties, which abut Eisele road. The Bye property does not abut Eisele 86 -CV -19-65 Road; e. The United States of America, through the Farm Service Agency United States Department of Agriculture appeared by Assistant United States Attorney Roylene A. Champeau by telephone with attorney Seykora, but no answer was filed; and that each and all of the said Defendants are in default herein, the Court, being fully advised in the premises, upon the pleadings and proceedings herein, and upon the records and files herein and the evidence introduced, finds the following: FACTS 1. That the Plaintiffs, Denn Family Limited Partnership, above named, at the time of the commencement of this action, were and ever since have been and now are the owners in fee of the said Premises described in the Amended Complaint, and hereinafter described as set forth in Exhibit A attached ("the Premises"). 2. That the Plaintiffs are in possession of the Premises and that said Premises are occupied by Plaintiffs. 3. Plaintiff is fee owner of the Premises, which title to the Premises was obtained by four (4) Quit Claim Deeds all dated December 27, 2006, and recorded February 13, 2007, as Document Nos. 1043019, 1043020, 1043021 and 1043022 in the office of the County Recorder for Wright County, Minnesota. 3 86 -CV -19-65 4. That defendant Mark J. Holker received title to his property pursuant to a Warranty Deed dated March 9, 2012, filed March 15, 2012, as Wright County Recorder Document I►[: M8YIIr*%M 86 -CV -19-65 That the Holker Property is subject to a Real Estate Mortgage in favor of First Minnesota Bank, in the original principal amount of $125,000, which mortgage was recorded March 15, 2012, as Wright County Recorder Document No. 1197636. That the Holker Property is subject to a Mortgage in favor of the United States of America, through the Farm Service Agency, United States Department of Agriculture, in the original principal amount of $112,500, which mortgage was recorded March 15, 2018, as Wright County Recorder Document No. 1197637. 7. That the Holker Property is subject to a Mortgage in favor of the United States of America, through the Farm Service Agency, United States Department of Agriculture, in the original principal amount of $125,000, which mortgage was recorded April 23, 2012, as Wright County Recorder Document No. 1200874. 8. That defendants Thomas R. Collins, Kathryn L. Collins and Robert M. Collins received title to their property pursuant to a Quit Claim Deed dated November 21, 2011, filed November 23, 2011, as Wright County Recorder Document No. 1188623, and a Quit Claim Deed dated and filed October 12, 2016, as Document No. A1326879. 9. That the Collins' Property is subject to a Mortgage in favor of First Minnesota Bank, in the original principal amount of $15,000, which mortgage was recorded April 26, 2018, as Wright County Recorder Document No. A1368876. 4 86 -CV -19-65 10. That defendant Jane C. Cornelius received title to her property pursuant to a Personal Representatives Deed, Document No. 475842, an Affidavit of Survivorship, Document No. 475841 and a Warranty Deed, Document No. 496395. 96 -CV -19-65 11. That Plaintiff has had the Premises surveyed by Carlson McCain, which survey is dated October 15, 2018, and the survey also identifies the Holker, Collins, Cornelius and Bye Properties. 12. That the legal descriptions for the west line of the Holker, Collins and Cornelius Properties reference a County Road that no longer exists and to Lots A and B which are part of section maps currently archived in the Wright County Surveyor's Office and said section maps were not recorded. Because of the reference to a County Road that no longer exists, the legal descriptions for the west boundary lines of the Holker, Collins and Cornelius Properties are ambiguous. 13. That Eisele Avenue NW has been constructed in the same approximate location as the former County Road referenced in the legal descriptions of the Holker, Collins and Cornelius Properties. 14. That the legal description of the Premises does not encroach upon the legal descriptions of the Holker, Collins and Cornelius properties and by this Amended Complaint, Plaintiff is describing the west right-of-way line of Eisele Avenue NW as the boundary of the east line of the Premises and west line of the Holker, Collins and Cornelius Properties. 15. That defendant Shannon Leah Bye received title to her property in Certificate of title No. 6386.0. 16. That the Judicial Landmarks set to mark the boundaries of the Bye Property described in Certificate of Title No. 6386 encroach beyond the Bye Property into the Premises (the "Bye JLMs"). 5 86 -CV -19-65 17. That some evidence exists that the set location of the Bye JLMs have been altered. 18. That the legal description of Parcel 4 of the Premises described on Exhibit A describes the real property within the Premises that are encroached upon by the Bye JLMs. 86 -CV -19-65 19. That the Plaintiffs and their predecessors in title have been in possession of the Premises in an actual, open, notorious, continuous and hostile fashion for more than 15 years and they are the owners of the Premises. 20. That the Defendants, and each of them, claim an estate or interest in said premises, or lien thereon, adverse to the Plaintiffs. AND THE CONCLUSION OF LAW, THE COURT FINDS, that the Plaintiffs are entitled to judgment as prayed for in their Amended Complaint herein against the Defendants and each and all of them; that all adverse claims of the Defendants and each and all of them and all persons claiming, or to claim the Premises or any part thereof, through or under said Defendants or any of them, be adjudged and decreed to be invalid and groundless; that the Plaintiffs, Denn Family Limited Partnership, be adjudged and decreed to be the true and rightful owners in fee simple of the lands and premises hereinafter described in Exhibit A hereto; that the Plaintiffs' title be adjudged to be quieted and confirmed and the said Defendants and each and all of them, be adjudged and decreed to have no right, title, estate, lien or interest in said premises or any part thereof and that the said Defendants and each and all of them be perpetually enjoined from setting up any claim thereto or to any part thereof, said lands and premises being situated in the County of Wright and State of Minnesota, described as follows, to -wit: See Exhibit A attached hereto 0 86 -CV -19-65 LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Dated this day of 12019. 86 -CV -19-65 Filed in District Court State of Minnesota Apr 30 2019 10:09 AM hereby certify that the 1886631v1 foregoing order constitutes the Judgment of the Court Apr 30 2019 10:09 AM BY THE COURT Tenney, Geoffrey (Judge) 2019.04.29 09:08:33 on. Geoffrey W. Tenne:05'00' JUDGE OF DISTRICT COURT 86 -CV -19-65 EXHIBIT A PARCEL 1: That part of the Northwest Quarter of Section 24, Township 121, Range 25, Wright County, Minnesota, described as follows: 86CV-19-65 Commencing at the Northwest corner of said Northwest Quarter of Section 24; thence South 00 degrees 07 minutes 45 seconds West, assuming the West line of said Northwest Quarter bears South 02 degrees 06 minutes 16 seconds West, 408.28 feet to the centerline of 85th Street NE as described in Monticello Town Road Map per Document No. 390488; thence North 48 degrees 18 minutes 15 seconds West, along the northwesterly extension of said centerline of 85th Street NE, 18.26 feet to the West line of said Northwest Quarter, and the point of beginning of the parcel to be described; thence South 48 degrees 18 minutes 15 seconds East, along said northwesterly extension of 85th Street NE, 18.26 feet; thence continuing South 48 degrees 18 minutes 15 seconds East, along said centerline of 85th Street NE, 1302.04 feet; thence South 00 degrees 00 minutes 03 seconds East, 468.91 feet, more or less, to the intersection with the westerly extension of the South line lying westerly of said centerline of 85th Street NE of the parcel described in Certificate of Title No. 6386.0; thence North 89 degrees 22 minutes 37 seconds East, along said South line lying westerly of said centerline of 85th Street NE of the parcel described in Certificate of Title No. 6386.0 and its westerly extension, 414.90 feet to the southwesterly right of way line of 85th Street NE as described in said Monticello Town Road Map per Document No. 390488; thence southeasterly and southerly, along said southwesterly right of way line of 85th Street NE to the South line of said Northwest Quarter; thence South 89 degrees 10 minutes 07 seconds West, along said South line of the Northwest Quarter, 1773.52 feet to the Southwest corner of said Northwest Quarter; thence North 02 degrees 06 minutes 16 seconds East, along the West line of said Northwest Quarter, 2239.29 feet to the point of beginning. The North 854.06 feet of the West half of the Southwest Quarter of Section 24, Township 121, Range 25, Wright County, Minnesota. PARCEL 2: The West half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 23, Township 121, Range 25, Wright County, Minnesota. UONI That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 23, Township 121, Range 25, Wright County, Minnesota, lying northerly and westerly of the following described line: Commencing at the Southeast corner of said Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter; thence northerly, along the East line of said Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, 437.36 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence westerly, parallel with the South line of said Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, to the westerly right of way line of Eisele Avenue NE, as described in Monticello Town Road Map per Document No. 390488; thence southerly, along said westerly right of E:3 86 -CV -19-65 way line of Eisele Avenue NE, to the South line of said Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter and said line there terminating. AND That part of the Southeast Quarter of the SoutheasViouarter of Section 23, Township 121, Range 25, Wright County, Minnesota, lying West of the westerly right of way line of Eisele Avenue NE, as described in Monticello Town Road Map per Document No. 390488. PARCEL 3: That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 26, Township 121, Range 25, Wright County, Minnesota lying northerly of a line drawn southwesterly from a point on the East line of said Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter distant 990.00 feet north of the southeast corner of said Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter to the midpoint of the West line of said Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter and said line there terminating. AND That part of the North half of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 26, Township 121, Range 25, Wright County, Minnesota, lying West of the centerline of Eisele Avenue NE, as described in Monticello Town Road Map per Document No. 390488. AND PARCEL 4: That part of the Northwest Quarter of Section 24, Township 121, Range 25, Wright County, Minnesota, lying southerly of the centerline of 85`h Street NE as described in Monticello Town Road Map per Document No. 390488, lying westerly of the parcel described in Certificate of Title No. 6386.0, lying northerly of the westerly extension of the South line lying westerly of said centerline of 85`" Street NE of the parcel described in Certificate of Title No. 6386.0, and lying easterly of the following described line: Commencing at the Northwest corner of said Northwest Quarter of Section 24; thence South 00 degrees 07 minutes 45 seconds West, assuming the West line of said Northwest Quarter bears South 02 degrees 06 minutes 16 seconds West, 408.28 feet to said centerline of 85th Street NE as described in Monticello Town Road Map per Document No. 390488; thence North 48 degrees 18 minutes 15 seconds West, along the northwesterly extension of said centerline of 85th Street NE, 18.26 feet to the West line of said Northwest Quarter; thence South 48 degrees 18 minutes 15 seconds East, along said northwesterly extension of the centerline of 85th Street NE, 18.26 feet; thence continuing South 48 degrees 18 minutes 15 seconds East, along said centerline of 85th Street NE, 1302.04 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence South 00 degrees 00 minutes 03 seconds East, 468.91 feet, more or less, to the intersection with the westerly extension of the South line lying westerly of said centerline of 85' Street NE of said parcel described in Certificate of Title No. 6386.0 and said line there terminating. 6 MEMORANDUM d1 TO: Metro Legal Services, Inc. $ '�Y FROM: Terry R. Pahl ;�natro ie� �l ;;07yorn3, Inc. Barna, Guzy & Steffen, Ltd. (763)783-5141 RE: Recording certified copy of order '48 PACKAGE WAS C spa^� Court File No. 86 -CV -19-65 W7RoAmAwy-DF�Erzs ,�(%.Q,,,-_,,_,,, Our File No. 70383-001 DATED: May 3, 2019 Attached is a copy of a Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order for Judgment entered in the Wright County Court House. I need you to obtain a Certified copy of the Order from the Court and then take it to the County Recorder and have it recorded and obtain a conformed copy to send to us. This need to be done today!!!. Please let me know if there is anything else you need. Terry R. Pahl Electronically Served 4/3012019 10:10 AM Wright County, MN STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF WRIGHT Denn Family Limited Partnership, a Minnesota limited partnership Plaintiff, vs. 86 -CV -19-65 Filed in District Court State of Minnesota Apr 29 2019 9:54 AM Mark J. Holker, First Minnesota Bank, United States of America, through Farm Service Agency, United States Department of Agriculture, Thomas R. Collins, Kathryn L. Collins, Robert M. Collins, Jane C. Cornelius and Shannon Leah Bye, also all other persons or entities who claim any right, title, estate, lien or other interest in the real estate described herein, Defendants. DISTRICT COURT TENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT Other Civil/Quiet Title Hon. Geoffrey W. Tenney Court File No. 86 -CV -19-65 FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND ORDER FOR JUDGMENT The above -entitled matter came on for hearing before The Honorable Geoffrey W. Tenney, Judge of the above-named Court, at the Wright County Courthouse in the City of Buffalo, Minnesota, on the 291h day of April, 2019; Karen M. Kurth appeared for the Plaintiffs and there was no appearance on the part of the Defendants. It appearing by the Affidavit and from the files herein that the Summons, Complaint and Amended Complaint were duly served upon each and all of the Defendants herein as provided by law; that more than twenty (20) days have elapsed since the service of said Summons; that none of the said Defendants have answered or defended in said action with the exception of the following: OFFICIAL RECEIPT Wright County Court Administration 10 2nd St.NW Room 201 Buffalo MN 55313-1192 763-682-7539 Payor Receipt No. Metro Legal Minneapolis MN 0086-2019-02200 Transaction Date 05/3/2019 Description Amount Paid Miscellaneous Payment Misc Certified Copy -Single 14.00 SUBTOTAL 14.00 PAYMENT TOTAL 1 14.001 Check (Ref #258819) Tendered 14.00 Total Tendered 14.00 Change 0.00 05/03/2019 Cashier Audit 10:24 AM Station 86WWRCA035 1654638279 OFFICIAL RECEIPT Date 6' 3— ? Name M 4,h-0 l RECEIPT Office of County Recorder Wright County Instrument Amount _Mortgage Satisfaction Deed 1jUCL,w gly �J be-AtI i pei _- I Total IOU Cash Check # Z S 1w ? ZU ALTA Commitment (6/17/06) 4 ALTA Commitment Form COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE Issued by stewarto title guaranty company STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY, a Texas Corporation ("Company"), for a valuable consideration, commits to issue its policy or policies of title insurance, as identified in Schedule A, in favor of the Proposed Insured named in Schedule A, as owner or mortgagee of the estate or interest in the land described or referred to in Schedule A, upon payment of the premiums and charges and compliance with the Require- ments; all subject to the provisions of Schedules A and B and to the Conditions of this Commitment. This Commitment shall be effective only when the identity of the Proposed Insured and the amount of the policy or policies committed for have been inserted in Schedule A by the Company. All liability and obligation under this Commitment shall cease and terminate six months after the Effective Date or when the policy or policies committed for shall issue, whichever first occurs, provided that the failure to issue the policy or policies is not the fault of the Company. The Company will provide a sample of the policy form upon request. This Commitment shall not be valid or binding until countersigned by a validating officer or authorized signatory. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Stewart Title Guaranty Company has caused its corporate name and seal to be affixed by its duly authorized officers on the date shown in Schedule A. 1 1-1 Chairman d the Board Dennis J. Unger, Vice President Authorized Countersignature Land Title, Inc. Company Roseville, MN City, State JN ALTA Commitment (6/17/06) - stewart, .___-trio a,, anry com.wey 6!-` t 1968 p" +. Tf X A L t_J CONDITIONS 1. The term mortgage, when used herein, shall include deed of trust, trust deed, or other security instrument. If the proposed Insured has or acquires actual knowledge of any defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter affecting the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment other than those shown in Schedule B hereof, and shall fail to disclose such knowledge to the Company in writing, the Company shall be relieved from liability for any loss or damage resulting from any act of reliance hereon to the extent the Company is prejudiced by failure to so disclose such knowledge. If the proposed Insured shall disclose such knowledge to the Company, or if the Company otherwise acquires actual knowledge of any such defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter, the Company at its option may amend Schedule B of this Commitment accordingly, but such amendment shall not relieve the Company from liability previously incurred pursuant to paragraph 3 of these Conditions and Stipulations. 3. Liability of the Company under this Commitment shall be only to the named proposed Insured and such parties included under the definition of Insured in the form of policy or policies committed for and only for actual loss incurred in reliance hereon in undertaking in good faith (a) to comply with the requirements hereof, or (b) to eliminate exceptions shown in Schedule B, or (c) to acquire or create the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. In no event shall such liability exceed the amount stated in Schedule A for the policy or policies committed for and such liability is subject to the insuring provisions and Conditions and Stipulations and the Exclusions from Coverage of the form of policy or policies committed for in favor of the proposed Insured which are hereby incorporated by reference and are made a part of this Commitment except as expressly modified herein. 4. This Commitment is a contract to issue one or more title insurance policies and is not an abstract of title or a report of the condition of title. Any action or actions or rights of action that the proposed Insured may have or may bring against the Company arising out of the status of the title to the estate or interest or the status of the mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment must be based on and are subject to the provisions of this Commitment. The policy to be issued contains an arbitration clause. All arbitrable matters when the Amount of Insurance is $2, 000, 000 or less shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Insured as the exclusive remedy of the parties. You may review a copy of the arbitration rules at<http://www.alta.org/>. stewart® title guaranty company All notices required to be given the Company and any statement in writing required to be furnished the Company shall be addressed to it at P.O. Box 2029, Houston, Texas 77252. Page 2 stewart title ALTA COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE ISSUED BY STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY NOTICE 84154-1186-0 IMPORTANT - READ CAREFULLY: THIS COMMITMENT IS AN OFFER TO ISSUE ONE OR MORE TITLE INSURANCE POLICIES. ALL CLAIMS OR REMEDIES SOUGHT AGAINST THE COMPANY INVOLVING THE CONTENT OF THIS COMMITMENT OR THE POLICY MUST BE BASED SOLELY IN CONTRACT. THIS COMMITMENT IS NOT AN ABSTRACT OF TITLE, REPORT OF THE CONDITION OF TITLE, LEGAL OPINION, OPINION OF TITLE, OR OTHER REPRESENTATION OF THE STATUS OF TITLE. THE PROCEDURES USED BY THE COMPANY TO DETERMINE INSURABILITY OF THE TITLE, INCLUDING ANY SEARCH AND EXAMINATION, ARE PROPRIETARY TO THE COMPANY, WERE PERFORMED SOLELY FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE COMPANY, AND CREATE NO EXTRACONTRACTUAL LIABILITY TO ANY PERSON, INCLUDING A PROPOSED INSURED. THE COMPANY'S OBLIGATION UNDER THIS COMMITMENT IS TO ISSUE A POLICY TO A PROPOSED INSURED IDENTIFIED IN SCHEDULE A IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS AND PROVISIONS OF THIS COMMITMENT. THE COMPANY HAS NO LIABILITY OR OBLIGATION INVOLVING THE CONTENT OF THIS COMMITMENT TO ANY OTHER PERSON. COMMITMENT TO ISSUE POLICY Subject to the Notice; Schedule B, Part I - Requirements; Schedule B, Part II - Exceptions; and the Commitment Conditions, STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY, a Texas corporation (the "Company"), commits to issue the Policy according to the terms and provisions of this Commitment. This Commitment is effective as of the Commitment Date shown in Schedule A for each Policy described in Schedule A, only when the Company has entered in Schedule A both the specified dollar amount as the Proposed Policy Amount and the name of the Proposed Insured. If all of the Schedule B, Part I - Requirements have not been met within six months after the Commitment Date, this Commitment terminates and the Company's liability and obligation end. Countersigned by Dennis J. Unger, Vice President gggq�_ Authorized Countersignature �otwORMatt Morris President and CEO Land Title, Inc. 3 1908 Company Name Roseville, MN City, State Denise Secretary For purposes of this form the "Stewart Title" logo featured above is the represented logo for the underwriter, Stewart Title Guaranty Company. This page is only a part of a 2016 ALTA8 Commitment for Title Insurance. This Commitment is not valid without the Notice; the Commitment to Issue Policy; the Commitment Conditions; Schedule A; Schedule B. Part I - Requirements; and Schedule B, Part l/ - Exceptions; and a countersignature by the Company or its issuing agent that may be in electronic form. Copyright 2006-2016 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. AMERICAN All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. i ANT) ITT[ LT File No.: 576728 ASSOCIATION 008 -UN ALTA Commitment For Title Insurance 8-1-16 < Page 1 of 11 a COMMITMENT CONDITIONS 1. DEFINITIONS (a) "Knowledge" or "Known": Actual or imputed knowledge, but not constructive notice imparted by the Public Records. (b) "Land": The land described in Schedule A and affixed improvements that by law constitute real property. The term "Land" does not include any property beyond the lines of the area described in Schedule A, nor any right, title, interest, estate, or easement in abutting streets, roads, avenues, alleys, lanes, ways, or waterways, but this does not modify or limit the extent that a right of access to and from the Land is to be insured by the Policy. (c) "Mortgage": A mortgage, deed of trust, or other security instrument, including one evidenced by electronic means authorized by law. (d) "Policy": Each contract of title insurance, in a form adopted by the American Land Title Association, issued or to be issued by the Company pursuant to this Commitment. (e) "Proposed Insured": Each person identified in Schedule A as the Proposed Insured of each Policy to be issued pursuant to this Commitment. (f) "Proposed Policy Amount": Each dollar amount specified in Schedule A as the Proposed Policy Amount of each Policy to be issued pursuant to this Commitment. (g) "Public Records": Records established under state statutes at the Commitment Date for the purpose of imparting constructive notice of matters relating to real property to purchasers for value and without Knowledge. (h) "Title": The estate or interest described in Schedule A. 2. If all of the Schedule B, Part I - Requirements have not been met within the time period specified in the Commitment to Issue Policy, this Commitment terminates and the Company's liability and obligation end. 3. The Company's liability and obligation is limited by and this Commitment is not valid without: (a) the Notice; (b) the Commitment to Issue Policy; (c) the Commitment Conditions; (d) Schedule A; (e) Schedule B, Part I - Requirements; (f) Schedule B, Part II - Exceptions; and (g) a countersignature by the Company or its issuing agent that may be in electronic form. 4. COMPANY'S RIGHT TO AMEND The Company may amend this Commitment at any time. If the Company amends this Commitment to add a defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim, or other matter recorded in the Public Records prior to the Commitment Date, any liability of the Company is limited by Commitment Condition 5. The Company shall not be liable for any other amendment to this Commitment. 5. LIMITATIONS OF LIABILITY (a) The Company's liability under Commitment Condition 4 is limited to the Proposed Insured's actual expense incurred in the interval between the Company's delivery to the Proposed Insured of the Commitment and the delivery of the amended Commitment, resulting from the Proposed Insured's good faith reliance to: (i) comply with the Schedule B, Part I - Requirements; (ii) eliminate, with the Company's written consent, any Schedule B, Part II - Exceptions; or (iii) acquire the Title or create the Mortgage covered by this Commitment. (b) The Company shall not be liable under Commitment Condition 5(a) if the Proposed Insured requested the amendment or had Knowledge of the matter and did not notify the Company about it in writing. (c) The Company will only have liability under Commitment Condition 4 if the Proposed Insured would not have incurred the expense had the Commitment included the added matter when the Commitment was first delivered to the Proposed Insured. This page is only a part of a 2016 ALTA® Commitment for Title Insurance. This Commitment is not valid without the Notice; the Commitment to Issue Policy; the Commitment Conditions; Schedule A; Schedule B, Part I - Requirements; and Schedule B, Part l/ - Exceptions; and a countersignature by the Company or its issuing agent that may be in electronic form. Copyright 2006-2016 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. AMERICAN All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. i ANT l rn I LT File No.: 576728 ,""''M-' 008 -UN ALTA Commitment For Title Insurance 8-1-16 Page 2 of 11 (d) The Company's liability shall not exceed the lesser of the Proposed Insured's actual expense incurred in good faith and described in Commitment Conditions 5(a)(i) through 5(a)(iii) or the Proposed Policy Amount. (e) The Company shall not be liable for the content of the Transaction Identification Data, if any. (f) In no event shall the Company be obligated to issue the Policy referred to in this Commitment unless all of the Schedule B, Part I - Requirements have been met to the satisfaction of the Company. (g) In any event, the Company's liability is limited by the terms and provisions of the Policy. 6. LIABILITY OF THE COMPANY MUST BE BASED ON THIS COMMITMENT (a) Only a Proposed Insured identified in Schedule A, and no other person, may make a claim under this Commitment. (b) Any claim must be based in contract and must be restricted solely to the terms and provisions of this Commitment. (c) Until the Policy is issued, this Commitment, as last revised, is the exclusive and entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter of this Commitment and supersedes all prior commitment negotiations, representations, and proposals of any kind, whether written or oral, express or implied, relating to the subject matter of this Commitment. (d) The deletion or modification of any Schedule B, Part II - Exception does not constitute an agreement or obligation to provide coverage beyond the terms and provisions of this Commitment or the Policy. (e) Any amendment or endorsement to this Commitment must be in writing and authenticated by a person authorized by the Company. (f) When the Policy is issued, all liability and obligation under this Commitment will end and the Company's only liability will be under the Policy. 7. IF THIS COMMITMENT HAS BEEN ISSUED BY AN ISSUING AGENT The issuing agent is the Company's agent only for the limited purpose of issuing title insurance commitments and policies. The issuing agent is not the Company's agent for the purpose of providing closing or settlement services. 8. PRO -FORMA POLICY The Company may provide, at the request of a Proposed Insured, a pro -forma policy illustrating the coverage that the Company may provide. A pro -forma policy neither reflects the status of Title at the time that the pro -forma policy is delivered to a Proposed Insured, nor is it a commitment to insure. 9. ARBITRATION The Policy contains an arbitration clause. All arbitrable matters when the Proposed Policy Amount is $2,000,000 or less shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Proposed Insured as the exclusive remedy of the parties. A Proposed Insured may review a copy of the arbitration rules at <http://www.alta.orq/arbitration>. STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY All notices required to be given the Company and any statement in writing required to be furnished the Company shall be addressed to it at P.O. Box 2029, Houston, Texas 77252-2029. This page is only a part of a 2016 ALTA® Commitment for Title Insurance. This Commitment is not valid without the Notice; the Commitment to Issue Policy; the Commitment Conditions; Schedule A; Schedule 8, Part I - Requirements; and Schedule 8, Part 1l - Exceptions; and a countersignature by the Company or its issuing agent that may be in electronic form. Copyright 2006-2016 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. nM CRICA N ------------ All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. ' ^yI )-1 11 1 1 LT File No.: 576728 ?t11d11'" 008 -UN ALTA Commitment For Title Insurance 8-1-16 Page 3 of 11 ALTA COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE SCHEDULE A ISSUED BY STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY Transaction Identification Data for reference only: Issuing Agent: Land Title, Inc. Issuing Office: 2200 County Road C West, Suite 2205, Roseville, MN 55113 Issuing Office's ALTA® Registry ID: Loan ID Number: Commitment Number: 576728 Issuing Office File Number: 576728 Property Address: 8410 Eisele Avenue NE, Monticello, MN 55362 000 Unassigned, Monticello, MN 55362 000 Unassigned, Monticello, MN 55362 000 Unassigned, Monticello, MN 55362 Revision Number: 5 1. Commitment Date: May 7, 2019 at 7:00 am 2. Policy to be issued: (a) FX 2006 ALTA® Owner's Policy (6-17-06) Proposed Insured: Mark D. Schulte and David Schulte Proposed Policy Amount: $2,729,960.00 (b) 2006 ALTA® Loan Policy Proposed Insured: Proposed Policy Amount: $ (c) ALTA® Policy Proposed Insured: Proposed Policy Amount: $ 3. The estate or interest in the Land described or referred to in this Commitment is FEE SIMPLE. 4. The Title is, at the Commitment Date, vested in: Denn Family Limited Partnership, a Minnesota limited partnership 5. The Land is described as follows: See Attached Exhibit A. Abstract Property Wright County, State of Minnesota This page is only a part of a 2016 ALTA® Commitment for Title Insurance. This Commitment is not valid without the Notice; the Commitment to Issue Policy; the Commitment Conditions; Schedule A; Schedule 8, Part I - Requirements; and Schedule 8, Part II - Exceptions; and a countersignature by the Company or its issuing agent that may be in electronic form. Copyright 2006-2016 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. AMERICAN All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. rAivo —M E LT File No.: 576728 AeSOCiArJON 008 -UN ALTA Commitment For Title Insurance 8-1-16 Page 4 of 11 M ALTA COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE SCHEDULE A ISSUED BY STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY Commitment Number: 576728 Revision Number: 5 EXHIBIT A Parcel 1: That part of the Northwest Quarter of Section 24, Township 121, Range 25, Wright County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the Northwest corner of said Northwest Quarter of Section 24; thence South 00 degrees 07 minutes 45 seconds West, assuming the West line of said Northwest Quarter bears South 02 degrees 06 minutes 16 seconds West, 408.28 feet to the centerline of 85th Street NE as described in Monticello Town Road Map per Document No. 390488; thence North 48 degrees 18 minutes 15 seconds West, along the northwesterly extension of said centerline of 85th Street NE, 18.26 feet to the West line of said Northwest Quarter, and the point of beginning of the parcel to be described; thence South 48 degrees 18 minutes 15 seconds East, along said northwesterly extension of 85th Street NE, 18.26 feet; thence continuing South 48 degrees 18 minutes 15 seconds East, along said centerline of 85th Street NE, 1302.04 feet; thence South 00 degrees 00 minutes 03 seconds East, 468.91 feet, more or less, to the intersection with the westerly extension of the South line lying westerly of said centerline of 85th Street NE of the parcel described in Certificate of Title No. 6386.0; thence North 89 degrees 22 minutes 37 seconds East, along said South line lying westerly of said centerline of 85th Street NE of the parcel described in Certificate of Title No. 6386.0 and its westerly extension, 414.90 feet to the southwesterly right of way line of 85th Street NE as described in said Monticello Town Road Map per Document No. 390488; thence southeasterly and southerly, along said southwesterly right of way line of 85th Street NE to the South line of said Northwest Quarter; thence South 89 degrees 10 minutes 07 seconds West, along said South line of the Northwest Quarter, 1773.52 feet to the Southwest corner of said Northwest Quarter; thence North 02 degrees 06 minutes 16 seconds East, along the West line of said Northwest Quarter, 2239.29 feet to the point of beginning. AND The North 854.06 feet of the West half of the Southwest Quarter of Section 24, Township 121, Range 25, Wright County, Minnesota. Parcel 2: The West half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 23, Township 121, Range 25, Wright County, Minnesota. AND That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 23, Township 121, Range 25, Wright County, Minnesota, lying northerly and westerly of the following described line: Commencing at the Southeast corner of said Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter; thence northerly, along the East line of said Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, 437.36 feet to the point of beginning of the line to This page is only apart of a 2016 ALTA® Commitment for Title Insurance. This Commitment is not valid without the Notice; the Commitment to Issue Policy; the Commitment Conditions; Schedule A; Schedule B, Part I - Requirements; and Schedule B, Part II - Exceptions; and a countersignature by the Company or its issuing agent that may be in electronic form. Copyright 2006-2016 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. AMERICAN All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. LAND TITLE LT File No.: 576728 A"°c'AT°" 008 -UN ALTA Commitment For Title Insurance 8-1-16 Page 5 of 11 ALTA COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE SCHEDULE A ISSUED BY STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY Commitment Number: 576728 Revision Number: 5 be described; thence westerly, parallel with the South line of said Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, to the westerly right of way line of Eisele Avenue NE, as described in Monticello Town Road Map per Document No. 390488; thence southerly, along said westerly right of way line of Eisele Avenue NE, to the South line of said Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter and said line there terminating. AND That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 23, Township 121, Range 25, Wright County, Minnesota, lying West of the centerline of Eisele Avenue NE, as described in Monticello Town Road Map per Document No. 390488. Parcel 3: That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 26, Township 121, Range 25, Wright County, Minnesota, lying northerly of a line drawn southwesterly from a point on the East line of said Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter distant 990.00 feet north of the southeast corner of said Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter to the midpoint of the West line of said Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter and said line there terminating. AND That part of the North half of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 26, Township 121, Range 25, Wright County, Minnesota, lying West of the centerline of Eisele Avenue NE, as described in Monticello Town Road Map per Document No. 390488. Parcel 4: That part of the Northwest Quarter of Section 24, Township 121, Range 25, Wright County, Minnesota, lying southerly of the centerline of 85th Street NE as described in Monticello Town Road Map per Document No. 390488, lying westerly of the parcel described in Certificate of Title No. 6386.0, lying northerly of the westerly extension of the South line lying westerly of said centerline of 85th Street NE of the parcel described in Certificate of Title No. 6386.0, and lying easterly of the following described line: Commencing at the Northwest corner of said Northwest Quarter of Section 24; thence South 00 degrees 07 minutes 45 seconds West, assuming the West line of said Northwest Quarter bears South 02 degrees 06 minutes 16 seconds West, 408.28 feet to said centerline of 85th Street NE as described in Monticello Town Road Map per Document No. 390488; thence North 48 degrees 18 minutes 15 seconds West, along the northwesterly extension of said centerline of 85th Street NE, 18.26 feet to the West line of said Northwest Quarter; thence South 48 degrees 18 minutes 15 seconds East, along said northwesterly extension of the centerline of 85th Street NE, 18.26 feet; thence continuing South 48 degrees 18 minutes 15 seconds East, along said centerline of 85th Street NE, 1302.04 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence South 00 degrees 00 minutes 03 seconds East, This page is only a part of a 2016 ALTA® Commitment for Title Insurance. This Commitment is not valid without the Notice; the Commitment to Issue Policy; the Commitment Conditions; Schedule A; Schedule 8, Part I - Requirements; and Schedule 8, Part 11 - Exceptions; and a countersignature by the Company or its issuing agent that may be in electronic form. Copyright 2006-2016 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. AMERICAN All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. LANE) TITLE LT File No.: 576728 ASSOCIAIJON 008 -UN ALTA Commitment For Title Insurance 8-1-16 Page 6 of 11 M ALTA COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE SCHEDULE A ISSUED BY STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY Commitment Number: 576728 Revision Number: 5 468.91 feet, more or less, to the intersection with the westerly extension of the South line lying westerly of said centerline of 85th Street NE of said parcel described in Certificate of Title No. 6386.0 and said line there terminating. Abstract Property This page is only apart of a 2016 ALTA® Commitment for Title Insurance. This Commitment is not valid without the Notice; the Commitment to Issue Policy; the Commitment Conditions; Schedule A; Schedule 8, Part I - Requirements; and Schedule 8, Part 11 - Exceptions; and a countersignature by the Company or its issuing agent that may be in electronic form. Copyright 2006-2016 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. AMrR1CAN All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. LAN _D_T.IT.:H LT File No.: 576728 ,>sociA110� 008 -UN ALTA Commitment For Title Insurance 8-1-16 Page 7 of 11 ALTA COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE SCHEDULE B PART I ISSUED BY STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY Commitment Number: 576728 Revision Number: 5 SCHEDULE B,PART I Requirements All of the following Requirements must be met: A. The Proposed Insured must notify the Company in writing of the name of any party not referred to in this Commitment who will obtain an interest in the Land or who will make a loan on the Land. The Company may then make additional Requirements or Exceptions. B. Pay the agreed amount for the estate or interest to be insured. C. Pay the premiums, fees, and charges for the Policy to the Company. D. Documents satisfactory to the Company that convey the Title or create the Mortgage to be insured, or both, must be properly authorized, executed, delivered, and recorded in the Public Records. E. The description of the Land constitutes a split of an existing parcel. Obtain for recording the approval of the appropriate municipality or county for that split. Submit it to the Company for examination and possible further requirements prior to closing. All real estate taxes for the current year and prior years must be paid before documents can be recorded. F. Determine if Parcel 4 is to be conveyed to Shannon Bye. G. Satisfaction of Mortgage executed by Ronald C. Denn and Lisa Denn, husband and wife, dated May 12, 2011, filed May 19, 2011 as Document Number Al 176241 in favor of TCF National Bank, in the amount of $117,380.00. (Part Parcel 2) H. If any work or labor has been performed on the subject property within the last 120 days (from the effective date of this commitment), we require sworn construction statements and all lien waivers prior to closing. I. It appears that this property has been assessed under MSA S 273.111 (Green Acres). A search may be desired prior to closing. J. Warranty Deed from Ronald C. Denn and Lisa Denn, husband and wife to Denn Family Limited Partnership. K. Warranty Deed from Denn Family Limited Partnership to Mark D. Schulte and David Schulte. L. The standard form of Seller's and/or Purchaser's Affidavit, satisfactory to the Company, will be required. This page is only apart of a 2016 ALTA® Commitment for Title Insurance. This Commitment is not valid without the Notice; the Commitment to Issue Policy; the Commitment Conditions; Schedule A; Schedule 8, Part 1 - Requirements; and Schedule 8, Part 11 - Exceptions; and a countersignature by the Company or its issuing agent that may be in electronic form. Copyright 2006-2016 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. AM F.RIC AN All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. LANDTITLE LT File No.: 576728 AoWCJAuu.v 008 -UN ALTA Commitment For Title Insurance 8-1-16 Page 8 of 11 ALTA COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE SCHEDULE B PART II ISSUED BY STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY Commitment Number: 576728 Revision Number: 5 SCHEDULE B, PART II Exceptions THIS COMMITMENT DOES NOT REPUBLISH ANY COVENANT, CONDITION, RESTRICTION, OR LIMITATION CONTAINED IN ANY DOCUMENT REFERRED TO IN THIS COMMITMENT TO THE EXTENT THAT THE SPECIFIC COVENANT, CONDITION, RESTRICTION, OR LIMITATION VIOLATES STATE OR FEDERAL LAW BASED ON RACE, COLOR, RELIGION, SEX, SEXUAL ORIENTATION, GENDER IDENTITY, HANDICAP, FAMILIAL STATUS, OR NATIONAL ORIGIN. The Policy will not insure against loss or damage resulting from the terms and provisions of any lease or easement identified in Schedule A, and will include the following Exceptions unless cleared to the satisfaction of the Company: 1. Any defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim, or other matter that appears for the first time in the Public Records or is created, attaches, or is disclosed between the Commitment Date and the date on which all of the Schedule B, Part I - Requirements are met. NOTE: Upon closing with Land Title, Inc., Item 1 on Schedule B, Part II will be deleted. The Final Policy will extend coverage as to the gap between the Effective Date listed in Item 1 of Schedule A and the date of recording of the instruments creating the interest to be insured. 2. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. 3. Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land. 4. Easements or claims of easements, which are not shown by the public records. 5. Any lien or right to a lien for services, labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 6. Taxes or special assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records. 7. General and special taxes and assessments as hereafter listed, if any (all amounts shown being exclusive of interest, penalties and costs). 8. No coverage is provided for municipal code compliance matters and fees including, but not limited to, utilities, right of way maintenance, water or sewer services, or fees for tree, weeds, grass, and snow or garbage removal, police boarding, vacant building registration and zoning. This page is only a part of a 2016 ALTA" Commitment for Title Insurance. This Commitment is not valid without the Notice: the Commitment to Issue Policy; the Commitment Conditions; Schedule A; Schedule 8, Part I - Requirements; and Schedule 8, Part 11 - Exceptions; and a countersignature by the Company or its issuing agent that may be in electronic form. Copyright 2006-2016 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. AMERICAN All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. LAND TITLE ANSOCIASION LT File No.: 576728 008 -UN ALTA Commitment For Title Insurance 8-1-16 Page 9 of 11 TM ALTA COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE SCHEDULE B PART II ISSUED BY STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY Commitment Number: 576728 Revision Number: 5 9. Any lease, grant, exception or reservation of minerals or mineral rights appearing in the public records. 10. Tax I.D. No.: 213100234102 Taxes for the year 2019: $1,378.00, Total, are 1st 1/2 Paid, 2nd 1/2 Due, Base Tax: $1,378.00 (Homestead). Tax I.D. No.: 213100234101 Taxes for the year 2019: $4,274.00, Total, are 1st 1/2 Paid, 2nd 1/2 Due, Base Tax: $4,274.00 (Homestead). NOTE: It appears that this property has been assessed under MSA S 273.111 (Green Acres). A search may be desired prior to closing. Tax I.D. No.: 213100242200 Taxes for the year 2019: $2,142.00, Total, are 1st 1/2 Paid, 2nd 1/2 Due, Base Tax: $2,142.00 (Homestead). NOTE: It appears that this property has been assessed under MSA S 273.111 (Green Acres). A search may be desired prior to closing. Tax I.D. No.: 213100261200 Taxes for the year 2019: $88.00, Total, are 1st 1/2 Paid, 2nd 1/2 , Base Tax: $88.00 (Homestead). NOTE: It appears that this property has been assessed under MSA S 273.111 (Green Acres). A search may be desired prior to closing. NOTE: 1st Half Taxes are payable on or before May 15th and 2nd Half Taxes are payable on or before October 15th. 11. Levied and pending special assessment searches have been ordered. 12. Right of way conveyance in favor of Standard Oil Company dated August 2 1946, filed September 23, 1946 in Book 5 of Misc, page 566 as Document Number 165685, which was assigned to The American Oil Company by Book L of Assionments. Dacle 185, filed January 25, 1961, Partially Released by Document Number 483099, filed December 21, 1990 and assigned to Tesoro West Company by Assignment filed September 30, 2002 as Document Number 809104 and Assignment to Kaneb Pipe Line Operating Partnership L.P. by assignment filed May 6, 2003 as Document Number 847833. Parcel 1(Undefined) 13. Easement in favor of Northern States Power Company dated December 7, 1951, filed April 22, 1952 in Book 10 of Misc, page 44 as Document Number 186039. Parcel 1 (Undefined) This page is only a part of a 2016 ALTA' Commitment for Title Insurance. This Commitment is not valid without the Notice; the Commitment to Issue Policy; the Commitment Conditions; Schedule A; Schedule 8, Part I - Requirements; and Schedule 8, Part 11 - Exceptions; and a countersignature by the Company or its issuing agent that may be in electronic form. Copyright 2006-2016 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. AMERICAN All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. LAND TITLE .U.1U[;IAIIU4 LT File No.: 576728 008 -UN ALTA Commitment For Title Insurance 8-1-16 Page 10 of 11 ALTA COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE SCHEDULE B PART 11 ISSUED BY STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY Commitment Number: 576728 Revision Number: 5 14. Easement in favor of Northern States Power Company dated June 7, 1952, filed June 12, 1952 in Book 9 Misc, page 624 as Document Number 186537. Parcel 1 (Undefined) 15. Easement in favor of Northern States Power Company in Final Decree dated October 6, 1964, filed October 6, 1964 in Book 27 of Misc, page 177 as Document Number 233577 and Assignment and Assumption by Excel Energy Inc filed February 22, 2001 as Document Number 732312. Parcel 1 16. Monticello Town Road Map filed October 24, 1984 as Document Number 390488. 17. Subject to 85th Street NE, Fallon Avenue NE , Edmonson Avenue NE and Eisele Avenue North as shown on available maps. 18. Wetland as shown on available maps. (Parcel 4) 19. If there are any questions regarding this Commitment, please contact Jon Edstrom at (651) 697-6127 or by email at jedstrom@landtitleinc.com. This page is only a part of a 2016 ALTA® Commitment for Title Insurance. This Commitment is not valid without the Notice; the Commitment to Issue Policy, the Commitment Conditions; Schedule A; Schedule B, Part I - Requirements; and Schedule B, Part 11 - Exceptions; and a countersignature by the Company or its issuing agent that may be in electronic form. Copyright 2006-2016 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. AMERICAN All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. LAND TITLE LT File No.: 576728—M-1A11ON 008 -UN ALTA Commitment For Title Insurance 8-1-16 Page 11 of 11 Subject Parcels June 6, 2018 City Boundary Bryan Pittman CITV OF � Monticello 1 inch= 1,505 feet Map Powered by DataLink from WSB &Associates L.11 v Ur CITY OF MONTICELLO Community Development 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1 Monfi(do Monticello, MN 55362 (763) 295-2711 . info(aci.monticello.mn.us CITY OF MONTICELLO ANNEXATION REVIEW PROCESS - ANNEXATION UNDER JOINT AGREEMENT FOR ORDERLY ANNEXATION BETWEEN MONTICELLO CITY AND MONTICELLO TOWNSHIP 1. Petition for annexation submitted to the City of Monticello by the property owner. Petition shall be accompanied by: a. Documentation of ownership, including legal description and title commitment. b. Certificate of survey or boundary exhibit; City may require: i. Signed by a registered land surveyor ii. Current (within last 6 months) topographic survey and contours of all surface features including drainage ways, wetlands, etc. iii. Public utilities including pipe size, material type, depths iv. Private utilities v. Legal description vi. Easements of record c. Map exhibit d. Most current tax statement e. Other documents as may be required to evaluate the petition 2. Request for annexation reviewed for conformance to MOAA agreement as follows: a. Evaluate conformity with the terms of the MOAA agreement, in particular compliance with Section 2 of the agreement. b. To determine conformity with MOAA's requirement for the orderly extension of municipal services and consistency with the City's long- range land use plan, the City has reviewed annexation petitions subject to the review and approval of the following: i. Preliminary plat ii. Environmental review as may be required iii. Utility service capacity review as may be required iv. For parcels without an existing Comprehensive Plan land use designation, application for a Comprehensive Plan amendment to provide land use guidance for the subject parcel(s). v. For parcels with a Comprehensive Plan guided land use, parcels require rezoning action upon annexation to the City; rezoning action is subject to review for consistency with the Comprehensive Plan land use designation. Procedurally, the Planning Commission and City Council consider an application for preliminary plat, comprehensive plan amendment and rezoning subject to and contingent upon future annexation. 3. Annexation petition approval consideration. a. Final decision for annexation by the City would be considered with concurrent decisions for comprehensive plan amendment (as may be required), final plat, development agreement providing for and securing the extension of municipal services, and rezoning. 4. Non-conformance. a. If non -conforming to MOAA agreement, the petition is reviewed by the City Council for denial of acceptance due to lack of conformance. b. There is a provision within the MOAA Agreement which allows for annexation outside of the agreement's standard criteria if agreed by both City and Township. A-6979 Monticello/Monticello Township STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- IN THE MATTER OF THE, PETITION FOR ) THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN LAND ) JOINT RESOLUTION TO THE CITY OF MONTICELLO PURSUANT ) TO MINNESOTA STATUTES, SEC'T'ION 414.031) THE AGREEMENT PREVIOUSLY SIGNED BY THE CITY AND TOWNSHIP OF MONTICELLO ON JUNE 21, 2004 IS HEREBY AMENDED BY JOINT ACTION OF BOTH PARTIES AND THE COUNTY OF WRIGHT. ALL CHANGES TO THE PREVIOUS AGREEMENT ARE CONTAINED WIT14IN THIS NEW AGREEMENT. JOINT RESOLUTION FOR ORDERLY ANNEXATION BY AND BETWEEN MONTICELLO TOWNSHIP AND THE CITY OF MONTICELLO IN SETTLEMENT OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION FILE NO. A-6979 MONTICEI,,LO/MONTICELLO TOWNSHIP WHEREAS, the City of Monticello filed an annexation petition, dated October 13, 2003, with the Minnesota Department of Administration Municipal Boundary Adjustments Office (File No. A-6979 Monticello/Monticello Township) seeking annexation of certain areas located within Monticello Township pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 414.031; and WHEREAS, Monticello Township and the City of Monticello have been working toward settlement of their boundary dispute and have reached a settlement agreement believed to be in the mutual best interests of both parties; and WHEREAS, the City of Monticello (hereinafter the "City") and Monticello Township (hereinafter the "Township") desire to enter into an agreement allowing for the orderly annexation of certain property, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 414.0325; and WHEREAS, the City and Township are in agreement to the procedures and process for orderly annexation of certain lands described herein for the purpose of orderly, planned growth; and WHEREAS, the City and Township have agreed to work cooperatively to accomplish the orderly annexation of the areas legally described herein; and WHEREAS, the City and Township agree that orderly annexation and extension of municipal services to those areas designated herein that are urban or suburban or about to become so is in the best interests of the City, Township and property owners and would benefit the public health, safety and welfare of the entire community; and WI-IFREAS, for the areas designated herein, the City and the Township desire to accomplish the orderly annexation of said areas in a mutually acceptable and beneficial manner as urban development occurs and without the need for a hearing; and WHEREAS, the parties hereto desire to set forth the terms and conditions of such orderly annexation by means of this Joint Resolution in settlement of the above -referenced contested case matter. NOW, 1-1 IEREFOI2E, BE I7' RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Monticello and the Township Board of Supervisors of the Township of Monticello as follows: Descrintion of Area Designated for Orderlv Annexation. The area of the Township located within the area marked on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A is deemed by the parties to be properly subject to orderly annexation under and pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 414.0325. The parties hereby designate this area for orderly annexation as provided by conditions for annexation set forth in this Joint Resolution. The area designated herein for orderly annexation, as shown on Exhibit A, shall be referred to for case of reference as the "Orderly Annexation Area" ("OAA"). The City may annex, at any time after the execution of this Joint Resolution, land located within the OAA, in accordance with the terms and conditions stated herein for annexation and in accordance with Paragraph 13 of this Joint Resolution. The designated area shown on the attached map as Exhibit A is legally described in Exhibit B, both of which exhibits are attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 2. Conditions and Triaaerine Events for Annexations. Notwithstanding Paragraph 3 of this Joint Resolution, any land within the OAA (see Exhibit A and Exhibit B) may be annexed by the City, in accordance with Paragraph 13 of this Joint Resolution, under any of the following circumstances: a. The City receives a petition for annexation from 100% of the property owners of an individual parcel of land contiguous to or abutting the City; b. The area is completely surrounded by the City, except that this provision may not be used to annex the subdivisions named in this subparagraph 2.b. (Devron Green, the Dunes, Glendale, Monticello Acres, Ponderosa, Prairie Acres, O.K. Coral Ranchette, Riverside Acres, Tyler East, Walesch Addition, and Walesch 2nd Addition, as said subdivisions are recorded in the Wright County Recorders Office on the effective date of this Joint Resolution) for a period of ten years following the effective date of this Joint Resolution; c. The City or property owner(s) is ordered by the State Pollution Control Agency or Department of Health to provide sewer or water service to a portion of the Township for the protection of the public health and safety and/or because of immediate environmental concerns; 2 d. The City decides to add an arterial or collector road to its Municipal State Aid street system, but only to the extent of the right-of-way needed for the road, and provided, however, that any costs associated with installation of these roads will not be assessed to Township residents by the City, nor deferred until future annexation of the property, unless different arrangements are otherwise agreed to by the City and a property owner; e. The City, with Township approval, determines by resolution that land, right-of- way, or easements are needed for a public works improvement project designed to provide sanitary sewer pumping and conveyance facilities, water supply, water storage or water conveyance facilities, stormwater retention, stormwater detention or stormwater conveyance facilities, but only to the extent needed for said facilities. The City's statutory condemnation authority shall not otherwise be limited by this provision. With respect to Wright County Ditch 33, notwithstanding the foregoing, Township approval shall not be required for a stormwater project under this provision should Wright County otherwise approve the project or convey Ditch 33; f. In the case of platted residential subdivisions, the City receives a petition from a majority of property owners, either in a given contiguous area, or a block in a platted residential subdivision, or from the entire subdivision, for annexation and/or provision of sewer or water services. g. A licensed inspector retained by Wright County determines that at least 30% of the individual sewage treatment systems or individual wells within a platted residential subdivision or neighborhood or block in such a subdivision are failing or are not meeting state drinking water standards; or h. The City and Township otherwise jointly agree in writing. For purposes of this Joint Resolution land shall be considered to be contiguous to, abut, abuts, or abutting the City where the boundaries of said land or area to be annexed at least touch the City boundary at a single point, including areas whose boundaries would touch the City boundary at a single point but for an intervening roadway, railroad, waterway, or parcel of publicly owned land. Further, due to actions pending at the time of this agreement, the proposed residential subdivision known as "I lidden Forest" shall be considered to be contiguous to the City. 3. Zoning and Planning. For any areas of the Township in the OAA that are not annexed pursuant to this Joint Resolution, planning and zoning authority as specified herein within the OAA shall be governed by a 5 -member Joint Planning Board (JPB) described as follows: a. The JPB shall be made up of two members appointed by the Township Board, two members appointed by the City Council, and one member of the Wright County Board appointed by the Wright County Board of Commissioners. 3 b. The Jl'B shall serve as the "governing body" and "board of appeals and adjustments" for purposes of Minnesota Statutes, sections 462.357 and 462.358 within the OAA and shall have all of the powers contained in sections 462.351 to 462.364, except as otherwise provided by this Joint Resolution. The Wright County Planning and Zoning Office shall serve as staff and advisors to the JPB, unless otherwise determined by the JPB. The JPB may, at any time, also consult with City staff as it deems necessary to effectively carry out its duties and responsibilities. The costs of administration of the JPB shall be paid equally by the City and Township. Any remuneration (per diem) paid to members serving on the JPB or retaining consultants to provide services to the JPB shall be approved and equally paid by the city and township. d. The JPB will set the schedules for necessary zoning and planning fees in the OAA. The fees shall be consistent with the fee structure used by Wright County, unless otherwise determined by the JPB. e. Except as otherwise provided, any action of the JPB to exercise its authority as specified herein must be preceded by a majority vote (at least 3 out of the 5 members) of the members of the JPB voting on the prevailing side. f. As soon as practicable after execution of this Joint Resolution, the JPB shall review the area included in the OAA, existing comprehensive plans in the City, Township and County, and determine whether the JPB should develop a joint land use plan for the OAA. If a joint plan is developed, the City and Township shall thereafter review and comment on the plan. The City and Township shall consider incorporating the developed plan or plan elements into the City's and Township's respective comprehensive plans. g. The JPB shall require that the existing Township zoning or Wright County zoning, whichever is applicable and more restrictive, in effect within the OAA on the effective date of this Joint Resolution, remain in full force and effect and unchanged during the term of this Joint Resolution, unless said area or portion thereof is either first annexed or said zoning change is otherwise approved by a supermajority vote (4 out of 5 members) of the JPB. Any decision by the JPB to zone or rezone portions of the OAA shall be subject to review and comment by the City and Township prior to such zoning or rezoning becoming effective. The JPB shall give the City and Township at least 30 days to review and comment before making a zoning or rezoning decision. The City or Township shall waive its right to review and comment if it fails to review and comment within the specified period provided herein. The JPB shall not approve a subdivision within the OAA unless first approved by a supermajority vote (4 out of 5 members) of the JPB. The Township shall not zone, rezone, plat, re -plat, subdivide, or re -subdivide within the OAA between the time of development of this Joint Resolution and the effective date 4 of this Joint Resolution, unless otherwise agreed to in writing by the City. For the purposes of this paragraph, "subdivision" shall not include building entitlement transfers for agricultural lot splits and property transfers between family members under the current Wright County Zoning Ordinance, as adopted by the Township. h. Failure of the JPB to exercise any of its authority as described herein shall not render this Joint Resolution or any other provisions contained herein invalid or unenforceable, and the terms and conditions contained in this Joint Resolution shall otherwise remain in full force and effect and binding upon the parties hereto. i. Each member serving on the JPB shall serve a period of one year ending December 31. A term on the JPB may be extended, by action of a member's respective governing body. The JPB shall meet monthly or as needed as determined by the JPB members. 4. Merger. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the City and Township shall combine in their entirety under the following circumstances: 1) at such time as the Township and the City adopt a joint resolution so providing; or 2) at such time as seventy-five percent (75%) of the Township, as the Township exists on the effective date of this Joint Resolution, is annexed to the City, whichever comes first. Annexation by the City of the remainder of the Township shall be accomplished in accordance with Paragraph 13. The City shall hire any remaining Township personnel following the effective date of annexation of the remainder of the Township. As soon as practicable following the effective date of' annexation resulting in the merger of the City and Township, the City will hold municipal elections for all of the City Council and Mayor positions. 5. Adout and Enforce Regulations. The City and Township agree to enact, adopt, and strictly enforce all such resolutions, ordinances, or regulations, as may be or shall be necessary to give full effect to the stipulations contained in this Joint Resolution. 6. Tax Reimbursement. Upon the annexation of land located within the OAA pursuant to Paragraph 13 of this Joint Resolution, the City shall reimburse the Township for the loss of taxes from the property so annexed in accordance with the following: a. In the year when the City could first levy on the annexed area, the City shall make a cash payment to the "Township in an amount equal to four (4) times the property taxes distributed to the Township in regard to the annexed area in the last year that property taxes from the annexed area were payable to the Township. b. Thereafter, the City will no longer reimburse the Township. The City shall make payment as contemplated herein no later than December 31 of the first 5 year following the year when the City could first levy on the annexed area and for any subsequent years. 7. Provision of Services. After annexation of land located within the OAA, the City shall be responsible for providing municipal governmental services to the annexed area. Sanitary sewer or water services, in the City's discretion, shall be provided to an area annexed with existing or proposed residential development within three (3) years after the effective date of the annexation. Sewer or water services, in the City's discretion, shall be provided to an area annexed with existing or proposed commercial, industrial, governmental or institutional development within five (5) years after the effective date of annexation. In the event that the City extends trunk sewer and/or water lines across a portion of the OAA remaining in the Township in order to serve an area annexed by the City, the individual properties remaining in the Township that abut the City trunk sewer and/or water line extended shall not be charged any trunk sewer or water line charges, fees or assessments by the City for the trunk sewer and/or water line abutting said properties until said properties are annexed by the City and are platted and developed. A failure on the part of the City, not due to circumstances beyond the City's control, to provide either of such sewer or water services within the time period specified following the effective date of annexation may subject the area so annexed to be deemed null and void by resolution of the Township adopted at a regular meeting of the Township, and the Township may thereafter petition the Department of Administration Municipal Boundary Adjustments Office, or its successor agency, for detachment of the area in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 414.06. The City shall not oppose the Township's petition for detachment provided it meets the conditions contained in this Joint Resolution. As an alternative to initiating a detachment proceeding, the Township may elect, by resolution adopted at a Township Board meeting, to have the City reimburse the Township for taxes lost on the applicable property annexed by the City at the Township's tax rate applicable in the year of annexation until the services required under this Paragraph are provided to the annexed property by the City. In order to act under this Paragraph, the Township shall make an election by resolution at a meeting of the "Township Board to either; 1) initiate a detachment proceeding, or Z) seek tax reimbursement as provided in this Paragraph, and provide notice to the City of the election, within ninety (90) days of the City's failure to provide said service as required under this Paragraph, or the Township may only seek tax reimbursement as provided in this Paragraph and waives the election to initiate a detachment proceeding under Section 414.06. For purposes of this Paragraph, the City will be deemed to have met the obligation to provide sanitary sewer or water service to an annexed area if within the timeframes specified herein following an annexation of an area, the City awards a contract to a contractor to construct a sewer or water service project making municipal sanitary sewer or water service available to an area annexed under the terms of this Joint Resolution. 6 Every Arinexation Resolution adopted under Paragraph 13 of this Joint Resolution resulting in the annexation of land located within the OAA shall be treated separately for purposes of compliance with this Paragraph 7. In the event that the City annexes land in accordance with a triggering event contained in this Joint Resolution and said land is identified in the City's comprehensive plan for open space or park preservation, the requirements contained in this Paragraph do not apply to said annexation since the intent is that said areas would remain as open space or park land and would not need City sewer or water service. S. Township Maintenance of Services. The Township agrees that it will be responsible for normal and regular maintenance of all Township roads, streets, bridges, drainage facilities and other public rights-of-way that it is currently maintaining within the designated OAA prior to annexation thereof. Maintenance of Township infrastructure within the designated OAA by the Township shall be consistent with other standard maintenance practices employed by the Township elsewhere in the Township. 9. Line Roads. For any Township roads that become the boundary line for the City and Township as a result of an annexation, the City shall assume responsibility for road maintenance and improvement for the entire section of the Township road that becomes the boundary line adjacent to the City. 10. No Annexation Outside the OAA. The parties agree that the City will not initiate any annexations outside the OAA while this agreement is in effect. Notwithstanding the forgoing, the City may initiate an annexation under Chapter 414 if the City is ordered by the State Pollution Control Agency or the Department of Health to provide sewer or water service to a portion of the Township for the protection of the public health and safety and/or because of environmental concerns. Further, the City will not file any petitions for a contested case annexation within the OAA or the remainder of the Township outside the OAA during the term of this Joint Resolution, provided that the Township does not seek to incorporate during the term of this Joint Resolution. 11. Expansion of OAA. For purposes of expansion of the OAA under this Paragraph, the OAA designated herein shall be divided into five sections shown on Exhibit C. The individual sections of the OAA as designated in and shown on Exhibit C may be expanded at such time as: 1) 75% of the land (excluding wetlands, the named subdivisions reference in Paragraph 2.b. of this Joint Resolution and lakes) within an individual section of the OAA is annexed; or 2) the City and Township jointly agree to expand a section, whichever comes first. In the event that one or more of the above conditions exists, the City and Township agree that the boundary line of the section of the OAA meeting the condition contained herein shall be expanded outward one-half section along the entirety of that section of the OAA boundary line as it exists at that time. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the City and Township may agree in writing to a different expansion area greater than or less than the one-half section expansion area provided for herein. 7 The City shall notify the Township in the event that any of the conditions stated in this Paragraph exist. Thereafter, the City shall file the appropriate adjustments to the OAA or any section thereof, within ninety (90) days of January I of each year that ends in a multiple of three (3) (i.e.: 2006, 2009, 2012...), with the Department of Administration, or its successor agency, including a new Amended Exhibit A, Amended Exhibit B, and Amended Exhibit C, which shall replace the Exhibit A, Exhibit B, and Exhibit C filed with this Joint Resolution, along with a letter so providing describing the adjustments to each section of the OAA and referencing this section of this Joint Resolution. 12. Withdraw Contested Case Petition. The City agrees to withdraw its pending annexation petition, Pile No.A-6979, as soon as practicable after execution and filing of this Joint Resolution with the State 13. No I learin-, Required. All annexations contemplated by this Joint Resolution in the OAA shall not require a hearing or any consideration by the State Department of Administration, or its successor agency. The City and Township agree that, upon the occurrence of an event triggering annexation as provided herein for any land located within the OAA, the City shall provide written notice of such occurrence to the Township, and upon receipt of a resolution of the City (referred to as the "Annexation Resolution") describing such area along with a copy of this Joint Resolution, the Department of Administration or its successor agency, may review and comment, but shall within thirty (30) days of receipt of the Annexation Resolution and a copy of this Joint Resolution, order the annexation of the area designated in the Annexation Resolution in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Joint Resolution. The City and Township agree that no alteration of the stated boundaries as described in the Annexation Resolution is appropriate, that no consideration by the Department of Administration, or its successor agency, is necessary, and that all terms and conditions for annexation are provided for in this Joint Resolution. Provided that the requisite terms and conditions have been met as contained in this Joint Resolution, the Township shall not object to an annexation initiated by the City filing an Annexation Resolution with the Department of Administration, or its successor agency. As of the effective date of this Joint RCSOlution, there is no election requirement in the law to effect or accomplish an annexation. No such election shall be required or apply to any annexation provided herein either now or during any period during which this Joint Resolution is in effect. 14. Disputes and Remedies. Subject to Paragraph 3, the City and Township agree as follows: a. Negotiation. When a disagreement over interpretation of any provision of this Joint Resolution shall arise, the City and the Township will direct staff members, as they deem appropriate, to meet at least one (1) time at a mutually convenient time and place to attempt to resolve the dispute through negotiation. b. Mediation/Arbitration. When the parties to this Joint Resolution are unable to resolve disputes, claims or counterclaims, or are unable to negotiate an 8 interpretation of any provision of this Joint Resolution, the parties may mutually agree in writing to seek relief by submitting their respective grievances to mediation and/or binding arbitration. Adiudication. When the parties to this Joint Resolution are unable to resolve disputes, claims or counterclaims, are unable to negotiate an interpretation of any provision of this Joint Resolution or are unable to agree to submit their respective grievances to mediation or binding arbitration, or such action has not otherwise resolved the matter in dispute, either party may seek relief through initiation of an action in a court of competent jurisdiction. In addition to the remedies provided for in this Joint Resolution and any other available remedies at law or equity, in the case of a violation, default, or breach of any provision of this Joint Resolution, the non -violating, non -defaulting, or non - breaching party may bring an action for specific performance to compel the performance of this Joint Resolution in accordance with its terms. 15. Termination. This Joint Resolution shall remain in full force and effect until one of the following conditions take place, whichever comes first: a. Termination by mutual written joint resolution of the City and Township; or b. The remainder of the Township is annexed resulting in the merger of the City and Township; or c. January 1, 2025. 16. Governing Law. This Joint Resolution is made pursuant to, and shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. 17. Modification/Amendment. Except as otherwise provided herein, this Joint Resolution shall not be modified, amended, or altered except upon the written joint resolution of the City and the Township duly executed and adopted by the City Council and the Township Board of Supervisors and filed with the Department of Administration, or its successor agency. 18. Severability_. In the event that any provision of this Joint Resolution is determined and adjudged to be unconstitutional, invalid, illegal or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions of this Joint Resolution shall remain in full force and effect, and the parties hereto shall negotiate in good faith and agree to such amendments or modifications of or to this Joint Resolution or other appropriate actions as shall, to the maximum extent practicable in light of such determination, implement and give effect to the intentions of the parties hereto. 19. Headings and Captions. Headings and captions are for convenience only and are not intended to alter any of the provisions of this Joint Resolution. 0 20. Entire AP-reement. The terms, covenants, conditions and provisions of this Joint Resolution, including the present and all future attachments, shall constitute the entire agreement between the parties hereto, superseding all prior agreements and negotiations. ThisJoint Resolution shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the respective successors and assigns of the City and Township. 21. Notice. Any notices required under the provisions of this Joint Resolution shall be in writing and sufficiently given if delivered in person or sent by U.S. mail, postage prepaid, as follows: If to the City: City Administrator Monticello City Hall 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1 Monticello, MN 55362-8831 10 If to the Township: Township Clerk Monticello Township 8550 Edmonson Ave., NE Monticello, MN 55362 Passed, adopted, and approved by the Township Board of'Supprvisors of the Township of Monticello, Wright County, Minnesota, this day of VaM , 2005. TOWNSHIP OF MONTICELLO By: a ..,� Franklin Denn, Chair ATTEST: C V�Uj Nancy Kopff, Towns ip erk Passed, adopted, and approved by the City Council of the City of'Monticello, Wright County, Minnesota, thi A't-' day of , 2005. CITY OF MONTICELLO By: C int Herbst, Mayor ATTEST: -"�'/ Rick Wolfsteller!City Administrator Passed, adopted, and approved by the Wright County Board of Commissioners, Wright County, Minnesota, this„ZA day of�, 2005. WRIGHT COUNTY By: A0 I Richard Mattson, Chair ATTEST: r Richard W. Norman, my Coordinator 11 EXHIBIT A The municipal boundary map referenced in Paragraph 1 of the attached Joint Resolution showing; the current City ol'Monticello and the OAA legally described in Exhibit B, is attached hereto. 1, EXHIBIT B The OAA shown in Exhibit A and referenced in the attached Joint Resolution is legally described as follows: Lands in Township 121, Range 25, Wright County, Minnesota: All of Sections 5, 9, and 16, Township 121, Range 25, Wright County, Minnesota And also that part of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 3, Township 121, Range 25, Wright County, Minnesota, lying southwesterly of Interstate I lighway No.94. And also that part of Section 4, Township 121, Range 25, Wright County, Minnesota, lying southwesterly of Interstate Highway No. 94, And also the Northeast Quarter, the cast -half of the Northeast Quarter of the Northxvest Quarter and the north-hall'ofthe Southeast Quarter, all in Section 8, Township 121, Range 25, Wright County, Minnesota. And also all that part of Section 10, Township 121, Range 25, Wright County, Minnesota lying southwesterly and westerly of the existing City of Monticello corporate limits. And also the east -half of Section 13, Township 121, Range 25, Wright County, Minnesota, except that part which lies within the existing City of Monticello corporate limits. And also that part of Section 15, Township 121, Range 25, Wright County, Minnesota, lying westerly of the existing City of Monticello corporate limits. And also the Northeast Quarter of Section 21, Township 121, Range 25, Wright County, Minnesota. And also all of the north -half of Section 22, Township 121, Range 25, Wright County, Minnesota, and that part ol'the south -half of said Section 22 lying easterly of State Trunk Highway No. 25. And also that part of Section 23, Township 121, Range 25, Wright Count, Minnesota lying southerly ofthe existing City of Monticello corporate limits. And also that part of Section 24, Township 121, Range 25, Wright County, Minnesota, lying southerly of the existing City of Monticello corporate limits. And also the north -half of Section 25, Township 121, Range 25, Wright County, Minnesota. And also the north-hall'of Section 26, Township 121, Range 25, Wright County, Minnesota. 14 And also that part ol'the north-halfol'Section 27, Township 121, Range 25, Wright County, Minnesota, lying easterly of State Trunk 111ghway No. 25. Lands in Township 121, Range 24, Wright County, Minnesota All of Section 7, Township 121, Range 24, Wright County, Minnesota. And also that part of the south -half of Section 8, Township 121, Range 24, Wright County, Minnesota, lying westerly of Government Lot 4 in said Section 8. And also all of the west -half, the west -half of the Northeast Quarter, and the west -half of the Southeast Quarter, all in Section 17, Township 121, Range 24, Wright County, Minnesota. ,And also Section 18, Township 121, Range 24, Wright County, Minnesota, except that part which lies within the existing City of Monticello corporate limits. And also that part of Section 19, Township 121, Range 24, Wright County, Minnesota, lying southerly of the existing City of Monticello corporate limits. And also the Northwest Quarter, the west -half of the Northeast Quarter, the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter and the north -half of the Southwest Quarter, all in Section 20, 'Township 121, Range 24, Wright County, Minnesota. And also all of the north -half of section 30, Township 121, Range 24, Wright County, Minnesota, and all of Government Lots 3 and 4 of the Southeast Quarter of said Section 30. Lands in Township 122, Range 25, Wright County, Minnesota: The east -half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 30, Township 122, Range 25, Wright County, Minnesota. And also the Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter and the east -hall of the Northeast Quarter ol" Section 31, Township 122, Range 25, Wright County, Minnesota. And also that part of Section 32, 'Township 122, Range 25, Wright County, Minnesota, lying southwesterly of the existing City or Monticello corporate limits. And also that part of the Southwest quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 33, Township 122, Range 25, Wright County, Minnesota, lying southNNesterly of the existing City of Monticello corporate limits. 15 EXHIBIT C The OAA section neap referenced in Paragraph I I of the attached Joint Resolution, showing the sections of the OAA in the Township for purposes of expansion is attached hereto. 16 Exhibits A, B and C shall be amended to create a straight line as the southern boundary of the Orderly Annexation Area. This change is accomplished by amending the legal descriptions of property included within Exhibit B as follows. For Lands in Township 121, Range 24, Wright Countv, Minnesota: Alter the final paragraph of this section to eliminate the phrase "and all of Government Lots 3 and 4 of the Southeast Quarter of said Section 30." The new paragraph shall therefore read: And also all of the north -half of Section 30, Township 121, Range 24, Wright County, Minnesota. No other changes to Exhibits A, B and C are proposed or adopted herein, and the prior exhibits as amended are included herein by reference. 12 MONTICELLO 0 2 -500 5 000 10,000 Feet Legend Orderly Annexation Area City of Monticello Monticello Township Boundary A WSB &As77 r� MONTICELLO 2.5 CD 5 CC.3 10,OOeet Leaend Orderly Annexation Area City of Monticello Section 1 Section 2 Section 3 Section 4 - Section 5 A WSB Legend Orderly Annexation Area City of Monticello Monticello Township Boundary A WSB & Associates, /nc. City Council Agenda: 05/28/2019 2N. Consideration of approving the purchase of a 2019 Kawasaki Mule 4x4 from Osseo Powersports for $18,431 (ML) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The wastewater treatment plant currently uses a 1999 Kawasaki Mule for maintenance operations around the facility. This vehicle is also utilized for plowing snow in the winter and is an essential piece of equipment for the plant. It is recommended that a new utility vehicle be purchased that is outfitted with a snow plow that would replace the 1999 Mule as the primary utility vehicle and the existing one be kept as a backup and for another operator to utilize for maintenance and operation functions. Currently one operator uses their personal vehicle for traveling between the different buildings within the facility. The city currently owns other Kawasaki Mules and has been satisfied with their performance. These units are geared lower and operate at lower speeds than other models and have proven to be reliable. The state contract number E-110(5) for ATVs, Utility Vehicles, Track Systems, and accessories doesn't include a gas powered Kawasaki Mule. Three quotes were received which are as follows: • Osseo Motorsports — $18,431.64 • Cities Edge Motorsports - $20,141.39 • Hilmerson Sports Center - $20,227.00 Staff recommends moving forward with the purchase of a 2019 Kawasaki Mule from Osseo Motorsports, for a price of $18,431.64 Al. Budget Impact: The 2019 Capital Budget includes $20,000 for the replacement of the Kawasaki Mule at the WWTP, and this will be funded from the sewage utility account. A2. Staff Workload Impact: Minimal B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the purchase of a 2019 Kawasaki Mule 4x4 from Osseo Powersports for $18,431.64. 2. Motion to deny the purchase of the Kawasaki Mule 4x4. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends Alternative #1. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • Osseo Powersports quote OSSEO POWERSPORTS 116 COUNTY ROAD 81 OSSEO, MN 55369 (763) 315-0200 PURCHASE AGREEMENT TOM PAWELK D.O.B.: D.O.B.: H W C (763) 250-8651 H W C Unit Information New/U Stock No. Year Make Model Name New SSK19-528112 2019 KAWASAKI MULE 4010 4X4 Trade Information Options: 4000 STL FRT DRS- BILK 2HR $1,637.95 D MULE 4000 CAB - BLK 4HRS $3,235.95 D SPR ING,STRUT, K=30.7N/ 1 HR $204.16 D MULE 3000 WIPER KIT 1 HR $308.95 D WARN PLOW PLADE UTV $389.95 D MULE 4000 HEATER KIT 2HRS $667.95 D WARN PV3500S WINCH $559.95 D WINCH MOUNT 1 HR $218.95 D FRONT FLOOR MAT $115.95 D WARN PLOW MT 4010 2HRS $577.95 D WARN PLOW BASE UTV $369.95 D BED LINER REGULAR $155.95 D 1/2000 COOL/DEF FAN $135.95 D N�ft§@OMETER KIT 2 PAS 1 HR $289.95 D Lien Holder: Date 04/23/2019 Order No. Salesman BRYCE MACHADO D.L.: D.L.: E -Mail: TOM. PAWELK@CI.MONTICELLO.MN.US E -Mail: Model Serial No. Price KAK620MKF JKlAFCM17KB528112 $8,952.00 ALL REBATES TO DEALER Manufacturer Retail Price $10,199.00 Dealer Unit Price $8,952.00 Factory Options $0.00 Added Accessories $8,869.51 Freight Dearer Prep / Set-up Fee $0.00 $199.00 Reg Tax $0.00 Plate Fee $0.00 GAP $0.00 Title Transfer Fee $0.00 PS Vehicle Fee 0.00 Lien/UCC Filing Fee 0.00 10.00 Service Contracts Propperty/Liabilityy State Deputy Filing Fee $0.00 $0.00 Filing Fee $7.00 Registration Fee $61.50 Convenience Fee 0.00 Extras 13 0.00 10.00 Extras 14 Osseo Powersports Promotion ($886.95) Cash Price $17,202.06 Trade Allowance$0.00 Payoff $0.00 Net Trade $0.00 Net Sale (Cash Price - Net Trade) $17,202.06 Sales Tax $1,129.58 Title/License/Registration Fees $0.00 Document or Administration Fees $100.00 Total Other Charges $1,229.58 Sub Total (Net Sale + Other Charges) $18,431.64 Cash Down Payment $0.00 Amount to Pay/Finance $18,431.64 NOTICE TO BUYER: (1) Do not sign this agreement before you read it or if it contains any blank spaces to be filled in. (2) You are entitled to a completed, signed copy of this agreement. (3) If you default in the performance of your obligations under this agreement, the vehicle may be repossesed, and you may be subject to suit and liability for the unpaid indebtness evidenced by this agreement. TRADE-IN NOTICE: Customer respresents that all trade in units described above are free of all liens and encumbrances except as noted. Customer Signature Customer Signature Manager Signature City Council Agenda: 05/28/2019 20. Consideration of approving an easement agreement in the amount of $1,927 with Speedwav for the 2018 Pedestrian Improvement proiect, Citv Proiect 18CO01 (ML) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: A draft easement agreement with Realty Income Properties (Speedway/Super America) was presented to the City Council on March 25, 2019 for the acquisition of permanent and temporary easements needed for construction of the Oakwood Drive sidewalk extension. Staff has tentatively reached an agreement with Speedway where they have agreed to donate 791 sf of permanent sidewalk easement and staff has negotiated compensation of $1,927.86 for 3,795 sf of temporary construction easement. They are also requesting no cost contribution, including special assessments, for the construction of the sidewalk. Speedway has indicated that the terms of the agreement are acceptable, but are awaiting final approval from all parties involved. It is recommended that Council approve the agreement and if modifications are proposed, staff will present these to Council at the meeting. The contractor for the project is ready to construct the sidewalk in June. Al. Budget Impact: At this time, the compensation value to Speedway totals $1,927.86 and is to be funded by capital improvement funds. A2. Staff Workload Impact: City staff and WSB have worked with the property owners to execute the agreement. A3. Strategic Plan Impact: The completion of the proposed pathway system segments is in direct support of the Strategic Plan goal for "Creating and Preserving Sustainable Livability", which cites as a primary objective the development of a more walkable and bikeable community. Further, the completion of pathway connections supports the Strategic Plan goal to "Strengthen Monticello's Image as a Destination". B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Consideration of approving an easement agreement with Speedway in the amount of $1,927.86 for the 2018 Pedestrian Improvement project, City Project 18CO01 2. Motion to deny at this time. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative No. 1. D. SUPPORTING DATA: 0 Realty Income Properties (Speedway/Super America) Easement Agreement (Reserved for recording) GRANT OF PERMANENT AND TEMPORARY EASEMENT REALTY INCOME PROPERTIES 3, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, "Grantor", in consideration of One -Thousand Nine Hundred Twenty Seven and 86/100ths Dollars ($1,927.86) and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, does hereby grant unto the CITY OF MONTICELLO, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota, Grantee, hereinafter referred to as the "City", its successors and assigns, 1. A permanent easement for public sidewalk purposes over, on, across, under and through the land situated in the County of Wright, State of Minnesota, as legally described on the attached Exhibit "A" and depicted on the attached Exhibit `B" (the "Permanent Easement Area"), including the rights of the City, its contractors, agents, servants, and assigns, to enter upon the Permanent Easement Area at all reasonable times to construct, reconstruct, inspect, repair, and maintain said public sidewalk over, across, on, under, and through the Permanent Easement Area, together with the right to grade, level, fill, drain, pave, and excavate the Permanent Easement Area, and the further right to remove trees, bushes, undergrowth, and other obstructions interfering with the location, construction, and maintenance of said public sidewalk. 2006360 1 The City and Grantor agree to the following conditions to the Grant of Permanent Easement: 1) The City will, at its cost, construct the public sidewalk located within the Permanent Easement Area. 2) The City will not levy special assessments to the subject property for construction of the public sidewalk located within the Permanent Easement Area. 2. A temporary construction easement over, across, on, under and through the land situated in the County of Wright, State of Minnesota, as legally described on the attached Exhibit "A" and depicted on the attached Exhibit "B" (the "Temporary Easement Area"). To have and to hold the same, unto the City, its contractors, agents, servants and assigns, commencing upon the execution of this document and expiring October 1, 2019 together with the right of ingress to and egress from the Temporary Easement Area, for the purpose of constructing, reconstructing, inspecting, repairing, and maintaining the property of the City, at the will of the City, its successors and assigns. Grantor hereby grants the uses herein specified without divesting itself of the right to use and enjoy the above described Temporary Easement Area, subject only to the right of the City to use the same for the purposes herein expressed. The City and Grantor agree to the following conditions to the Grant of Temporary Construction Easement. 1) City will construct the Facilities in a good and workmanlike manner, and will keep the Facilities in good maintenance and repair at its sole cost and expense. 2) City will give written notice to Grantor at least 10 days before beginning any work in the Temporary Easement Area, which notice will specify the work to be performed and a date when the work will be completed. City will use its best efforts to complete the work by that date. 3) Unless otherwise agreed in writing, within 90 days after City completes any work in the Temporary Easement Area, City will restore the Temporary Easement Area to the same or 2006360 2 better condition as it was in before City began the work and to a safe condition, and will remove all of its equipment, tools, trash and debris from the Temporary Easement Area. 4) Unless otherwise agreed in writing, City will not move, remove or demolish any of Grantor's signs, located within the Temporary Easement Area, the access drives, curbing or other improvements will not be disturbed except where needed to construct the sidewalk, pedestrian ramp and appurtenant work. 5) City will separate by cones or other appropriate construction safety barriers ("cone off') the Temporary Easement Area while City performs any work in the Temporary Easement Area. 6) City will perform all work in such a manner so as to not unduly disrupt the operation of the convenience store on Grantor's property. City will "cone off' no more than 4 parking stalls at any one time. Regarding the two accesses drives from Oakwood Drive consisting of the westerly Grantor's shared access drive with McDonalds (100 Oakwood Drive) and the easterly Grantor's access drive, City will not perform work on both access drives at the same time to allow for one full access open at all times. In addition, when work is occurring on the westerly shared access drive,_one lane will remain open at all for vehicular traffic to McDonalds. 7) City will not park on or store, except during construction operations, any construction vehicles, equipment or materials within the Temporary Easement Area or on Grantor's abutting property. 8) If any damage occurs to Grantor's property or any improvements thereon arising out of, related to, or as a consequence of any of City's work in the Temporary Easement Area, Grantor promptly will notify City in writing of the damage. Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, City will repair the damage (or commence and diligently pursue repairing the damage) within 30 days after receipt of Grantor's notice. 9) If City defaults under any provision of the temporary easement agreement, in addition to any other remedies available in law or equity, Grantor will be entitled to: 1) terminate this temporary easement on written notice; 2) obtain specific performance or any other appropriate equitable relief against City; and/or 3) in the case of incomplete repairs, Grantor may complete the necessary repairs, and City promptly will pay Grantor for the actual cost of the repairs plus 20% for overhead costs and expenses. 10) City will hold harmless and indemnify Grantor, its lessees, licensees, employees, agents, contractors and assigns, and each of their lessees, licensees, employees, agents, contractors and assigns, against any and all claims, liabilities and costs (including, but not limited to reasonable attorney's fees) for injuries to any person and damage to any property arising out of, in connection with, or as a result or consequence of City's work in and/or use of the Temporary Easement Area. 2006360 3 The above named Grantor, for itself, its successors and assigns, does covenant with the City, its successors and assigns, that it is well seized in fee title of the above described Permanent Easement Area and Temporary Easement Area; that it has the sole right to grant and convey the easements to the City; that there are no unrecorded interests in the Permanent Easement Area; that there are no unrecorded interests in the Temporary Easement Area; and that it will indemnify and hold the City harmless for any breach of the foregoing covenants. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the Grantor hereto has signed this document this day of , 2019. GRANTOR: REALTY INCOME PROPERTIES 3, LLC Its STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2019, by , the of Realty Income Properties 3, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, on behalf of said limited liability company. Notary Public THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTsoN Professional Association Grand Oak Office Center 1 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (651) 452-5000 JJJ/smt 2006360 4 EXHIBIT "A" TO GRANT OF PERMANENT AND TEMPORARY EASEMENT Permanent Easement Description A permanent easement for sidewalk purposes over, under, and across that part of Lot 3, Block 1, Monticello I-94 Tri Plaza, as is on file and of record in the Office of the County Recorder, Wright County, Minnesota, said permanent easement is described as follows: Commencing at the westerly most corner of said Lot 3; thence South 48 degrees 23 minutes 23 seconds East, assumed bearing along the southwesterly line thereof, 37.98 feet to the point of beginning of said easement to be hereinafter described; thence North 41 degrees 36 minutes 37 seconds East, perpendicular to said southwesterly line 6.01 feet; thence South 48 degrees 19 minutes 41 seconds East, 59.09 feet; thence South 39 degrees 40 minutes 14 seconds East, 19.97 feet; thence South 48 degrees 18 minutes 38 seconds East, 8.94 feet; thence South 56 degrees 56 minutes 08 seconds East, 20.00 feet; thence South 48 degrees 18 minutes 38 seconds East, 28.41 feet; thence South 61 degrees 49 minutes 35 seconds West, 6.22 feet to said southwesterly line; thence North 48 degrees 23 minutes 23 seconds West, along said southwesterly line, 133.81 feet to the point of beginning, and there terminating. And A permanent easement for sidewalk purposes over, under, and across that part of Lot 3, Block 1, Monticello I-94 Tri Plaza, as is on file and of record in the Office of the County Recorder, Wright County, Minnesota, said permanent easement is described as follows: Beginning at the southerly most corner of said Lot 3; thence North 33 degrees 27 minutes 22 seconds East, assumed bearing along the southeasterly line thereof, 6.73 feet; thence North 52 degrees 18 minutes 31 seconds West, 13.48 feet; thence South 12 degrees 16 minutes 28 seconds West, 6.58 feet to the southwesterly line of said Lot 3; thence South 48 degrees 23 minutes 23 seconds East, along said southwesterly line, 11.18 feet to the point of beginning, and there terminating. Temporary Easement Description A temporary easement for construction purposes over, under, and across that part of Lot 3, Block 1, Monticello I-94 Tri Plaza, as is on file and of record in the Office of the County Recorder, Wright County, Minnesota, said temporary easement is described as follows: The southwesterly 20 feet of said Lot 3 2006360 5 EXCEPT Commencing at the westerly most corner of said Lot 3; thence South 48 degrees 23 minutes 23 seconds East, assumed bearing along the southwesterly line thereof, 37.98 feet to the point of beginning of said easement to be hereinafter described; thence North 41 degrees 36 minutes 37 seconds East, perpendicular to said southwesterly line 6.01 feet; thence South 48 degrees 19 minutes 41 seconds East, 59.09 feet; thence South 39 degrees 40 minutes 14 seconds East, 19.97 feet; thence South 48 degrees 18 minutes 38 seconds East, 8.94 feet; thence South 56 degrees 56 minutes 08 seconds East, 20.00 feet; thence South 48 degrees 18 minutes 38 seconds East, 28.41 feet; thence South 61 degrees 49 minutes 35 seconds West, 6.22 feet to said southwesterly line; thence North 48 degrees 23 minutes 23 seconds West, along said southwesterly line, 133.81 feet to the point of beginning, and there terminating. ALSO EXCEPTING Beginning at the southerly most corner of said Lot 3; thence North 33 degrees 27 minutes 22 seconds East, assumed bearing along the southeasterly line thereof, 6.73 feet; thence North 52 degrees 18 minutes 31 seconds West, 13.48 feet; thence South 12 degrees 16 minutes 28 seconds West, 6.58 feet to the southwesterly line of said Lot 3; thence South 48 degrees 23 minutes 23 seconds East, along said southwesterly line, 11.18 feet to the point of beginning, and there terminating. 2006360 6 EXHIBIT "B" TO GRANT OF PERMANENT AND TEMPORARY EASEMENT y 1�'hr11f���k1! ly1'-rl I FST � � , GO Gi E U0479;ELLQ WN FD 155° KU 1090 • � II _-v 7 �iL_�v I ODD' l• i nwl�.sF'E. 5 y4S}� I aivWam �•� 39tr'�t,�E ��' X7141 +t -r'' 8 W ��5E130'iE UEidY LTf L&T g 4 $ TBdPCR RYCCcc�TRUCTICHEAMIPEW ]LYm 80. Fr. PEAYI+FEhR 910E0ffiL i Ed1SEYEW -m 80. Fr. Re aMd bF' Oakwood Sidewalk Extension Easement Exhbit ws Parcel 2 �f Cit}' of Manticella- Minnesata 2006360 r� S12 2M 2M IS41dSI'�4f e� •3, ,• 19 a8 E �it�2T22' e4aLrcrE • kkdTS 1110 L K44T Cf "rodhk. dtSL�'I#far IwC�- L41+�'1 TBdPCR RYCCcc�TRUCTICHEAMIPEW ]LYm 80. Fr. PEAYI+FEhR 910E0ffiL i Ed1SEYEW -m 80. Fr. Re aMd bF' Oakwood Sidewalk Extension Easement Exhbit ws Parcel 2 �f Cit}' of Manticella- Minnesata 2006360 LESSEE'S CONSENT TO GRANT OF PERMANENT EASEMENT SPEEDWAY LLC as successor by merger to NORTHERN TIER RETAIL LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, which has a leaseholder's interest in all or part of the property more particularly described in the foregoing Grant of Permanent Easement pursuant to that certain Lease with REALTY INCOME PROPERTIES 3, LLC, dated December 1, 2010 and recorded December 14, 2010 as Document No. A1164466 with the office of the County Recorder for Wright County, Minnesota, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, does hereby join in, consents to, and is subject to the foregoing Grant of Permanent and Temporary Easement. SPEEDWAY LLC Its: STATE OF ) (ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2019, by the of Speedway LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, on behalf of said limited liability company. NOTARY PUBLIC THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNuTsoN Professional Association Grand Oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (651) 452-5000 JJJ/smt 2006360 City Council Agenda: 05/28/2019 2P. Consideration of approving Dathwav micro -surfacing improvement uroiect and awarding the contract to MP Asphalt Maintenance in the amount of $22,576 (TP) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND The Monticello Parks Department is recommending applying a micro -surfacing (Roadguard) product on the pathways throughout the southeastern quadrant as a preventative maintenance method to preserve and extend the life of the pathway system. The pathway segments total approximately three miles. A map of the project area is included in the supporting data. Specifications were developed and quotes were solicited for this work. A total of four quotes were received, with the low quote from MP Asphalt Maintenance in the amount of $22,576.28. Other quotes included ACI Contractors for $55,887.99, Farhner Asphalt for $58,923.55, and Gopher State for $45,771.00. The project is proposed to include crack filling, infrared patching and installation of the Roadguard micro -surfacing product. These pathways segments have experienced surface deficiencies over time, primarily in the form of surface cracking, asphalt failure and minor to major raveling. Parks staff has inspected and rated the City's pathway system annually since 2009, and has developed a program to track, manage and perform maintenance of the pathway system. The City currently maintains 22 miles of bituminous pathways, with 8 miles of pathways included in the Snow Plowing Policy for winter snow and ice removal. Parks has used the PACER method to inspect and rate the pathways (see enclosed information). In addition, when determining methods to maintain the pathways, the Parks Department uses the following criteria: • Pavement structure condition and age. • Drainage issues. • Constructability of maintenance method. • Consideration for pathways that are plowed vs. not -plowed. • Frequency of use. Facts about the pathways proposed for micro -surfacing this year within the southeastern quadrant include the following: • 8-10 feet wide. • Some trails constructed in 1995 with 2" of bituminous pavement over 6" of aggregate base. Other trails constructed in the early 2000's. The project is anticipated to be completed in June, July or August. The micro -surfacing product will be applied when temperatures are a minimum 70 -degrees as specified. Al. Budget Impact: Approximately $50,000 is included in the Park and Pathway Budget for trail maintenance in 2019, which will cover the cost of the project. The remainder of pathway funds will be used for the Riverwalk Trail construction. A2. Staff Workload Impact: Department staff time will be utilized to manage the project, including pedestrian traffic control. City Council Agenda: 05/28/2019 B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS 1. Motion to accept the quote and to enter into a contract with MP Asphalt Maintenance for the annual pathway micro -surfacing project in the amount of $22,576.28. 2. Motion to deny the quotes for annual pathway maintenance project at this time. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION City staff recommends entering into a contract with MP Asphalt Maintenance for the annual pathway maintenance project as outlined in Alternative #1. The City's pathway system is a vital asset to the community similar to the City's street system. When surveyed, residents in the community stated that parks and pathways were one of the top three reasons why residents are drawn to Monticello; therefore, it is critical to keep up on the preservation of the pathway system. The Parks & Rec Commission has reviewed the pathway improvements and is recommending approval of the repairs utilizing the Roadguard product as specified. D. SUPPORTING DATA A. Pathway construction map B. Proposal tabulation C. Specifications 2 2019 PATHWAY MICROSURFACE PROJECT M1 SPECIFICATIONS: 15,272 TOTAL FEET I 35 TOTAL HEATS 1 BID TABULATION SUMMARY 2019 TRAIL PAVEMENT REHABILITATION CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA BIDS RECEIVED: BIDS OPENED: WEDNESDAY, MAY 22, 8:00AM. COI CONTRACTOR (X) 1. M & P ASPHALT X $ 2 GOPHER STATE SEALCOAT INC $ 3 ACI ASPHALT & CONCRETE $ 4 FAHRNER ASPHALT SEALERS SEALCOATING CRACK SEAL PATCH WORK TOTAL BID $ TOTAL SUM TOTAL SUM TOTAL SUM TOTAL SUM 15,882.88 $ 3,998.40 $ 2,695.00 33,005.00 $ 4,579.00 $ 6,650.00 35,767.14 $ 6,311.43 $ 4,509.28 $ 22,576.28 $ 45,771.00 $ 48,619.28 $ 58,932.55 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct tabulation of the quotes as received on May 22, 2019. `7 Tom Pawelk, Park Superintendent 4CITY OF mo ice o PUBLIC WORKS FNDMINVMI(SDEPN WAVMNNIENANCEPRCCNPM(PMP)WNTENMCE4IMIDTADDIATION M11/i019 -PAGE 1QF1 Prepared By: City of Monticello Office of Public Works 909 Golf Course Road Monticello, MN 55362 Tom Pawelk Park Superintendent Matt Leonard City Engineer Public Works Director Phone: 763-295-3170 Fax: 763-271-3272 Website: www.ci.monticello.mn.us CITY OF MONTICELLO SPECIFICATIONS FOR TRAIL PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FOR THE CITY OF MONTICELLO MINNESOTA MAY 8,2019 DESCRIPTION OF WORK SUMMARY This project consists of trail pavement rehabilitation intended to improve the serviceability and ride quality of the shared multi -use paved trail within the southeast quadrant of the City of Monticello. (see enclosed map of the project area). The trail segments identified for work have experienced surface deficiencies primarily in the form of surface cracking and minor to major raveling. The trail pavement will require crack filing, asphalt removal and patching or infrared patching, and Road -Guard asphalt surface treatment installation or alternate GSB-88 four step process for application. Bidders are encouraged to visit the site along with City staff to fully understand all of the project components. A lump sum breakdown including the unit prices for crack filling and asphalt patch work shall be provided along with the bid. The trail segment is a component of the City of Monticello paved trail system, a heavily -used route for trail users of all recreation types: walking/hiking/running, dog -walking, biking, rollerblading, commuting, and roller skiing. For these reasons, the Contractor must pay careful attention to the requirements for safety, maintenance of traffic, and approved work times, as referenced throughout the Contract Documents. To maintain heavy trail traffic during the summer months, the Contractor will be required to place RoadGuard or alternate GSB-88 four step process for application in specific trail Seg- ments, allowing trail to fully dry prior to moving onto next Segment. The contractor shall only close the trail segment that is actively being worked on. The contractor shall submit to the City a schedule of the intended closure dates of the trail segments one week prior to commencing work to allow the City to properly notify the public. The contractor shall not change the dates of closure once submitted (excluding delays due to weather related events). The contractor shall install temporary construction signage as necessary and as determined by the City. No substitutions will be allowed. aS*114:,%llI[iRKi]2*: UII10Lem 9;r_%to] 3*i The Contractor shall minimize disruption and damages to existing Project Site features, including but not limited to lawns, trees, existing topography, pavements, and curbing. All construction access and traffic shall be confined to the routes indicated on the Drawings or by the project Engineer. Any damages to Project Site features outside the specified routes shall be repaired and restored by the Contractor to the satisfaction of the City of Monticello at no cost to the City of Monticello. The Contractor and City of Monticello shall create a photo inventory of pre -construction conditions of the Project Site for later use in determination of changed conditions. END OF SECTION F:\ADMIN\PARKS DEPT\PATHWAY MAINTENANCE PROGRAM (PMP)\MAINTENANCE\2019\PATHWAY REHAB ROADGUARD SPECS - 2019.DOCX Page 1 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS SECTION 32 2350 CLEAN AND PREPARE TRAIL SURFACE PART 1 — GENERAL 1.1 SUMMARY A. Section includes thorough preparation of the existing bituminous surface to promote the successful coverage of micro -surfacing or sealcoating operations. 1.2 MEASUREMENT AND PAYMENT A. Measurement shall be by lump sum for all work described herein or as required by the Contract Documents. No additional measurement shall be made for items associated with the successful execution of the Work, including but not limited to labor, equipment, and materials. 1.3 PROJECT CONDITIONS A. Work shall be performed only when the following conditions are present: 1. Rain is not forecasted in the next 24 hours. B. Work shall be performed Monday through Friday, excluding holidays, during the hours of 7:00 AM to 7:00 PM, unless otherwise approved by the Owner. C. Contractor shall notify the Owner not less than 2 days prior to commencing work activities, excluding weekends and holidays. D. Prior to commencing work, the Contractor shall demonstrate compliance to the following requirements, to the satisfaction of the Owner: 1. Safety: a. Refer to the conditions of the Proposal Form. b. Contractor use of Owner -furnished products or materials shall not relieve the Contractor of any requirements and responsibili- ties for safety on the project. 2. Maintenance of Traffic: a. All trails shall remain CLOSED to public use during the work, un- less otherwise approved by the Owner Representative. 3. Timing of work: a. Shall be carefully planned to coordinate with subsequent work activities. F:\ADM I N\PARKS DEPT\PATHWAY MAINTENANCE PROGRAM (PMP)\MAINTENANCE\2019\PATHWAY REHAB ROADGUARD SPECS- 2019.DOCX Page 2 PART 2 — PRODUCTS 2.1 TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES A. Conform to devices prescribed by the MMUTCD, or approved equal. B. Survey ribbon, lathe, or rope shall not be acceptable traffic control devices. C. Acceptable traffic control devices include MUTCD sign panels installed on Type III barricades and/or portable fencing panels, and approved equals. D. Provide traffic control devices as shown in the plan. Relocate devices during performance of the work, as needed. 2.2 EQUIPMENT A. All equipment shall be appropriately sized and suitable for use on paved trails. B. All propelled equipment shall be rubber -tired. C. Audible and/or visual devices shall be installed on equipment, as appropriate, to provide advance warning to trail users. PART 3 - EXECUTION 3.1 EXAMINATION A. The Contractor shall coordinate a site meeting with the Owner Representative prior to commencing construction activities to generally review the scope of work and to ensure that the requirements of Part 1.3.D are acceptable. B. Receive approval to proceed from Owners Representative. 3.2 PERFORMANCE A. Using a string trimmer, edger, or similar, remove all encroaching vegetation from the trail edge, exposing the edge. B. Using a string trimmer, heat lance, or pick, remove all vegetation from cracks on the trail surface. C. Using a flat shovel or similar, remove all accumulated and/or embedded dirt and debris from relative low points, depressions, and poorly drained areas. D. Using a walk -behind blower, power broom, or similar, remove all dirt, dust, and debris from the trail surface, across its full width, ensuring that the surface will remain clean until subsequent work activities commence. 3.3 CLEAN UP AND DISPOSAL A. Remove and properly dispose of all work-related debris off site in accordance with local and state regulations. END OF SECTION F:\ADM I N\PARKS DEPT\PATHWAY MAINTENANCE PROGRAM (PMP)\MAINTENANCE\2019\PATHWAY REHAB ROADGUARD SPECS- 2019.DOCX Page 3 SECTION 32 2354 MICRO -SURFACING PART 1 —GENERAL 1.1 SUMMARY A. This section covers the furnishing of all labor, materials, tools, equipment and performance of all work and services necessary or incidental to construct micro - surfacing on a prepared pavement. 1.2 RELATED DOCUMENTS A. 2018 Mn/DOT Specification Section 2354, MICRO -SURFACING, shall apply except as modified herein. 1.3 MEASUREMENT AND PAYMENT A. Measurement shall be by project square yard for all work described herein or as required by the Contract Documents. No additional measurement shall be made for items associated with the successful execution of the Work, including but not limited to labor, equipment, and materials. B. Payment shall be in the amount of the contract unit price, per the conditions of the Contract Documents. C. Bituminous material for fog seal, where applicable, shall be considered incidental to the contract. 1.4 PROJECT CONDITIONS A. Work shall be performed only when the following conditions are present: 1. Air and surface temperature exceed 50 degrees F, and 2. Relative humidity is less than 60%, and 3. Rain has not fallen in the past 8 hours and 4. Rain is not forecasted in the next 24 hours, and 5. Next day high temperature forecast exceeds 50 degrees F. B. Placement of the product shall be performed Monday through Thursday, exclud- ing holidays, during the hours of 7:00 AM to 7:00 PM, unless otherwise ap- proved by the Owner. C. All Trails shall be open to the public Friday - Sunday D. Contractor shall notify the Owner not less than 2 days prior to commencing work activities, excluding weekends and holidays, such that the Owner can provide adequate advanced trail closure notice to staff and public. E. Prior to commencing work, the Contractor shall demonstrate compliance to the following requirements, to the satisfaction of the Owner: 1. Safety: a. Refer to the conditions of the Proposal Form. b. Contractor use of Owner -furnished products or materials shall not relieve the Contractor of any requirements and responsibili- ties for safety on the project. 2. Maintenance of Traffic: a. The Contractor shall CLOSE the paved trail to public use for the duration of the work, including curing and drying of the product, as shown in the drawings. b. Coordinate all traffic control and closures with the Owner Repre- sentative. F:\ADMIN\PARKS DEPT\PATHWAY MAINTENANCE PROGRAM (PMP)\MAINTENANCE\2019\PATHWAY REHAB ROADGUARD SPECS - 2019.DOCX Page 4 C. All turf trails shall remain open to public use throughout the du- ration of the work, unless otherwise approved by the Owners Representative. The Contractor shall maintain traffic through the turf trail segment crossings depicted on the Drawings. d. The Contractor shall be responsible for providing means and methods for traffic maintenance that are acceptable to the Owner Representative. Work Hours: a. Shall be carefully planned to optimize favorable weather condi- tions necessary for drying and curing of the product, and shall conform to the conditions of Parts 1.4.A through 1.4.C. PART 2 - PRODUCTS 2.1 PRODUCTS A. Micro -surfacing: Provide a micro -surface complying with Mn/DOT Specification Section 2354. The micro -surface type shall be Surface Course utilizing Type 1 aggregate gradation per Mn/DOT Specification Section 3139.5. Under this con- tract, the contractor shall not be obligated to apply either Rut Fill or Scratch Course Microsurfacing. A Job Mix Formula (JMF) complying with Mn/DOT Spec- ification Section 2354.2E shall be provided with the contractor's bid. B. Acrylic Adhesion Promoter or Bituminous Tack Coat: Use product approved by the asphalt emulsion product manufacturer if required by the Micro -surfacing JMF in heavily shaded areas. 2.2 AGGREGATE MATERIALS A. Aggregate shall consist of a durable manufactured sand, crushed stone or fines, or a combination thereof. The material shall not exceed 7% moisture content and shall be free of all plant or organic matter or debris. Aggregate shall comply with Mn/DOT Specification Section 3139.5. B. Aggregate gradation shall comply with Mn/DOT Specification Section 3139.5.B Type 1. C. Aggregate mixture rate shall be provided with JMF. 2.3 EQUIPMENT A. Distributor vehicle shall be self-propelled, rubber -tired, suitable for trail use, and capable of applying the product across the full width of the trail in a single pass. B. Distributor vehicle tank capacity shall not exceed 500 gallons. Not greater than 300 gallons of product shall be present in the tank at any time. C. Feeder vehicle shall be properly sized and loaded to travel to designated access points without risking damage to park infrastructure. 2.4 TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES A. Conform to devices prescribed by the MMUTCD, or approved equal. B. Survey ribbon, lathe, or rope shall not be acceptable traffic control devices. C. Acceptable traffic control devices include MUTCD sign panels installed on Type III barricades and/or portable fencing panels, or approved equals. F:\ADMIN\PARKS DEPT\PATHWAY MAINTENANCE PROGRAM (PMP)\MAINTENANCE\2019\PATHWAY REHAB ROADGUARD SPECS - 2019.DOCX Page 5 PART 3 - EXECUTION 3.1 EXAMINATION A. The Contractor shall coordinate a site meeting with the Owners Representative prior to commencing construction activities to generally review the scope of work and to ensure that the requirements of Part 1.4.D are acceptable. B. Conduct work only if the surface has been cleaned and prepared per Section 32 2350 - CLEAN AND PREPARE TRAIL SURFACE. C. The Owner may replace the Test Strip requirement (MN/DOT spec 2354.3B.4) for Phase 1, Day 1 construction. D. Receive approval to proceed from Owners Representative prior to commencing parts 3.2 through 3.4. 3.2 PREPARATION A. Apply Acrylic Adhesion Promoter or Bituminous Tack Coat to all heavily shaded areas and as shown on the plans or as directed by the Owners Representative if required by the Micro -surfacing IMF. Install per manufacturer's recommendations. B. The owner may waive MN/DOT specification 2354.3B.6 - Fog seal requirement if the IMF specifically states to apply product to an untreated asphalt surface. 3.3 PERFORMANCE A. Conduct work in phases to meet the requirements of Part 1.4.E.2. Install ap- propriate traffic control devices and move the devices as necessary during each phase. B. Apply a uniform coat of Micro -surface to the full trail width. Do not allow product to spill over the trail edge or to pool on the trail surface. C. Minimum coverage rate of Micro -surface shall be 0.50 gallons per square yard. Coverage rate shall be achieved with a minimum of two coats. D. Speed of distribution vehicle shall be sufficiently slow, to ensure optimal adhe- sion of the product. E. Finished surface of Micro -surface shall be smooth and free from defects caused during installation of material. Defects include, but are not limited to, ridges in surface, scratching of surface, squeegee marks, or contamination of material during placement. All defects shall be promptly corrected utilizing a squeegee to the satisfaction of the owner. F. Traffic control devices shall remain in-place until the finished surface has fully cured, dried, and can be opened to traffic without risk of damage to the work. G. A one year warranty will be provided to the Owner. Defective work will be cor- rected within the warranty period. 3.4 CLEAN UP AND DISPOSAL A. In the event of overspill of the product during installation, confine the product to the trail shoulder and prevent any flow towards surface waters or wetlands. Allow product to dry, and then return to clean up and dispose of the product. Overspill material shall be considered excess product. No compensation shall be made for overspill material. B. In the event of pooling of the product during installation, use a squeegee or similar to spread the product uniformly across the surrounding trail surface, provided that the resultant product thickness will cure and dry at the same rate as surrounding areas. If the resultant product thickness will not cure and dry at a reasonable rate, or at the direction of the Owner Representative, spread the product off of the trail edge, and treat it as overspill material. F:\ADMIN\PARKS DEPT\PATHWAY MAINTENANCE PROGRAM (PMP)\MAINTENANCE\2019\PATHWAY REHAB ROADGUARD SPECS - 2019.DOCX Page 6 C. Remove and properly dispose of all work-related debris and excess product off site in accordance with local and state regulations. D. Material beyond the edge of paved trail must be allowed to cure and dry, and then be cleanly detached from the adjacent pavement surface and properly disposed of off-site. END OF SECTION F:\ADMIN\PARKS DEPT\PATHWAY MAINTENANCE PROGRAM (PMP)\MAINTENANCE\2019\PATHWAY REHAB ROADGUARD SPECS - 2019.DOCX Page 7 gE3f } NOW. 1. REFER TO TECHNIC&SPMFICAflONSAND ORAWNW. 2 INFRARED REPAIR At -MM GENERALLY ViLIZE D FOR WERE OR MULHPI.E CRACKS AS SHOWN. (APPIUCAnON VARIE* PATCH WIDTH VARIES. INFRARED PATCH NTS HEAT NMMNM MAT CONSLST &Y ACROSS REFAR ARES. RALE 9OFT@81 BHUMNOLIS SURFACE. PLACE ADDIIONAL HOF MCG ASM4ALTAND RAKE WI MIXING. CMWACT NEW EAILMNOUS SURFACE DONOTILOCKSURFACE DRAMOE FLOW FAT F01". FKV OF SMOOTH T W4MONS TO EWTWG FAVFOAFM AND SIJGHRY CROWN NEW BITUAMNOU.S SURFACE E71ISi1NG BI UMNOUS MAT IGINEERED BASE F:\ADMIN\PARKS DEPT\PATHWAY MAINTENANCE PROGRAM (PMP)\MAINTENANCE\2019\PATHWAY REHAB ROADGUARD SPECS - 2019.DOCX Page 8 X611e4; 1, SAWCUT 1117LUrBN0LIS PAVE.MEM' RILLWIDTH BETWEEN REPAIR E]tF" R41=N7AL), 1. REMOVE i' OF SRUMNNOLLS MATEIIAL ON BOTH SIDES OF CRACK OR AS FIELD MARK iO REMOVE ALL HEAVING AND DISTORTION ASSOCIATED WITH CRACK 9. APPLY BIIUMMNCkATACK COAT MATERIAL TOSIDESOFSAWCLITPRIORTOPLACING NEW BRUMINOUS MATMIAL WDENTAI.J. 4, PLACE AND COMPACT BRUMINOUSMAT, SPWEA24106WIIHVERATORYROLLER EQUPMENf THAT IS PROPERLYSIIED TO NOT CAUSEANY RAMAGE TOAaIACENT TRAILS PERMnDOTBPEC 2M j. SHOULDER WRH TOPSOIL (AMENDED AND LDOSMDI, RESTORE Sffb[Ma,DDT M141) AND MULCH OR BLANKET AS DIRECTED BY OWNER AND PER MnDDTSPEC 2671. 6. DETAILREFEOTSACCEPTABLEMEiAM6AND MENODS.CONTRACTOR MAY SLEMIT ALTERNATIVE MEAM AND MEM 005 TO OWNER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL. 7. ALL COWMUCWN RELATED DEBRIS, VEGETATION AND CONTAMINATED SOILS SHALL W RF ROVED FROM THE SITE AND PROPERLY EMPOS®. SAW CUT. PULL07M T, It 3MMINOLLS TRAIL CRACK REPAIR! I" OR GREATER V� NTB F:\ADMIN\PARKS DEPT\PATHWAY MAINTENANCE PROGRAM (PMP)\MAINTENANCE\2019\PATHWAY REHAB ROADGUARD SPECS - 2019.DOCX Page 9 N h W z Y U_ x D z Q m Lu Lu O �o NOTES: 1. REFER TO TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS AND DRAWINGS. 2. DO NOT ROUT. 3. JOINT AND CRACK SEALANT: A. CRAFCO ASPHALT RUBBER PLUS #34241 4. APPLY SAND OR 1 -PLY PAPER AS PER TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS. -.9 2' MAX. OVERBAND WIDTH APPLY SEALANT AND "WIPE" THIN DVERBAND (SQUEEGEE FLUSH) N ACCORDANCE W/ TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS EXISTING BITUMINOUS MAT IGINEERED BASE �UBGRADE TR -2 BITUMINOUS TRAIL CRACK REPAIR: 1/4" - 1/2" NON -TRANSVERSE NTS F:WDMIN\PARKS DEPTIPATHWAY MAINTENANCE PROGRAM (PMP)\MAINTENANCE\2019\PATHWAY REHAB ROADGUARD SPECS - 2019.DOCX Page 10 N N Lu Z Y U_ x z Q m a Lu O �O NOTES: 1. REFER TO TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS AND DRAWINGS. 2. JOINT AND CRACK SEALANT: A. CRAFCO ASPHALT RUBBER PLUS #34241 3. APPLY SAND OR 1 -PLY PAPER AS PER TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS. --w 2" MAX. OVERBAND WIDTH --w 3/8"- 1/2" ROUT WIDTH APPLY SEALANT AND "WIPE" THIN OVERBAND (SQUEEGEE FLUSH) IN ACCORDANCE W/ TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS _ ROUT CRACK IN ACCORDANCE W/ TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS EXISTING BITUMINOUS MAT ENGINEERED BASE COMPACTED SUBGRADE TR 3 BITUMINOUS TRAIL CRACK REPAIR: 1/4" - 1/2" TRANSVERSE NTS F:WDMIN\PARKS DEPTIPATHWAY MAINTENANCE PROGRAM (PMP)\MAINTENANCE\2019\PATHWAY REHAB ROADGUARD SPECS - 2019.DOCX Page 11 2019 PATHWAY M ICROSURFACE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS: 15,272 TOTAL FEET 35 TOTAL HEATS �-+^ I s,� F:WDMIN\PARKS DEPTIPATHWAY MAINTENANCE PROGRAM (PMP)\MAINTENANCE\2019\PATHWAY REHAB ROADGUARD SPECS - 2019.DOCX Page 12 City Council Agenda: 05/28/2019 2Q. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2019-39 authorizing the convevance of citv property located at 707 West Broadwav and dispensing with statutory requirements for review by the Planning Commission and approving a contract for private development with Charles A. Maue (JO) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: At the May 13 meeting City Council authorized staff to prepare a purchase agreement with Charles Maue governing the transition of property located at 707 West Broadway. This document has been prepared and Council is asked to adopt the contract for sale and private redevelopment of the home. The terms of the sale are very similar to the terms identified previously with some of the high points as follows: • Property purchased as is. • Proposer improvements to be included as the minimum improvements under the agreement. • Two years to complete the project. • Property returns to the city if the proposer is unable to complete the project in 24 months. • In the event of developer default, City has two options. One is to take the property back and provide Maue with a 90% reimbursement of the sale price. As another option, if there are liens against the property at time of default, The City has the option is to not take the property back, but keep the full escrow ($20,000) in addition to retaining the sale revenue. Al. Budget Impact: Net $25,000 and a rehabilitated home in the neighborhood. A2. Staff Workload Impact: Time necessary to complete transaction and monitor process. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion adopting a Resolution 2019-39 authorizing the conveyance of city property located at 707 West Broadway and dispensing with statutory requirements for review by the Planning Commission and approving a contract with Charles A Maue. Vote requires 2/3 vote of Council due to waiving review by Planning Commission. 2. Motion to deny. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends alternative 1. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Draft Resolution B. Copy of contract for sale and private redevelopment of 707 West Broadway (Ellison House) to Charles A, Maue CITY OF MONTICELLO RESOLUTION NO. 2019-39 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CONVEYANCE OF CITY PROPERTY LOCATED AT 707 WEST BROADWAY AND DISPENSING WITH STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION WHEREAS, the City of Monticello owns real property located at 707 West Broadway ("Property"), in the City of Monticello and legally described in the Contract for Private Development between the City and Charles Maue ("Developer")as provided in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof (the "Contract"); WHEREAS, Developer desires to purchase the Property from the City and the City desires to convey the Property to Developer under the terms and conditions provided in the Contract; WHEREAS, Minn. Stat. § 462.356, subd. 2, requires that the Planning Commission review the City's sale of the Property for consistency with the Comprehensive Plan, except upon a 2/3 vote of the City Council dispensing with the requirement and finding that the sale of the Property has no relationship to the City's comprehensive plan; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota: 1. Pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 462.356, subd. 2., the City Council finds that the sale of the Property has no relationship to the City's comprehensive plan and hereby dispenses with review by the Planning Commission; 2. The Contract is hereby approved; and 3. The Mayor, City Administrator and City Clerk are authorized to execute any documents which, in the opinion of the City Attorney, are necessary to complete this transaction. 2022790 ADOPTED this 28th day of May, 2019, by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. CITY OF MONTICELLO Brian Stumpf, Mayor ATTEST: Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator 2 202279v1 EXHIBIT A Attach Contract for Private Development 2022790 (reserved for recording information) CONTRACT FOR PRIVATE REDEVELOPMENT 707 WEST BROADWAY THIS AGREEMENT, made on or as of the day of , 2019, by and between the CITY OF MONTICELLO, a public body corporate and politic under the laws of the State of Minnesota (the "City") and CHARLES A. MADE, a single individual (the "Developer"). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the City has received a proposal for the sale of the real property located in Monticello, Minnesota legally described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto (the "Property") to the Developer for improvement of the of the single family residence located on the Property (the "Project"); and WHEREAS, the City believes that the Project and fulfillment generally of this Agreement is in the best interest of the City and the health, safety, morals and welfare of the residents of the City and in accord with the public purposes and provisions of the applicable state and local laws and requirements. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual obligations of the parties hereto, each of them does hereby covenant and agree with the other as follows: 202046v4 ARTICLE I. DEFINITIONS In this Agreement, unless a different meaning clearly appears from the context: "Agreement" [or "Contract"] means this Contract for Private Development by and between the City and the Developer, as the same may be from time to time modified, amended or supplemented. "Articles and Sections" mentioned by number only are the respective Articles and Sections of this Agreement so numbered. "City" means the City of Monticello, Minnesota. "County" means the County of Wright, Minnesota. "Deed" means the limited warranty deed described in Section 3.1 to be executed by the City conveying the Property to the Developer. "Developer" Charles A. Maue, or any assigns that have received prior written approval from the City. "Event of Default" means an action by the Developer listed in Article VII of this Agreement. "Minimum Improvements" means improvement of the residence located on the Property as required and provided in the City's Request for Proposal and Developer's Proposal attached hereto as Exhibit B, to be to be completed in accordance with all applicable local, state and federal regulations governing such improvements; "Party" [or "Parties"] means the Developer and the City. "Project" means the Property and the completed Minimum Improvements thereon. "Property" means the real property as legally described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. "Purchase Price" means the sum of Thirty thousand and no/100 ($30,000.00) Dollars for the Property, which the Developer shall pay the City for the purchase of the Property. "State" means the State of Minnesota. "Unavoidable Delays" means delays outside the control of the Party claiming its occurrence which are the direct result of strikes, other labor troubles, unusually severe or prolonged bad weather, Acts of God, fire or other casualty to the Minimum Improvements, litigation commenced by third parties which, by injunction or other similar judicial action, 2 202046v4 directly results in delays, or acts of any federal, state or local governmental unit (other than the City) which directly result in delays. Unavoidable delays shall not include delays in the Developer's obtaining permits or governmental approvals necessary directly to enable construction of the Minimum Improvements. ARTICLE II. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES Section 2.1. Representations and Warranties by the City. The City represents and warrants that: (a) The City is a municipal corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of the State. Under the provisions of the laws of the State, the City has the power to enter into this Agreement and carry out its obligations hereunder. (b) The City makes no representation or warranty, either express or implied, as to the Property or its condition or soil conditions thereon, or that the Property is suitable for the Developer's needs except as specifically set forth in this Agreement. (c) Subject to satisfaction of the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the City will convey the Property to the Developer for improvement of the residence on the Property in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. (d) The City has received no notice of and has no knowledge of any pending or proposed special assessments affecting the Property or any proposed or pending public improvements which may give rise to any special or area assessments affecting the Property, except as provided in Section 5.1. (e) The City has received no notice of and has no knowledge that the Property or its use or uses are in violation of applicable law or any applicable private restriction. (f) The City has received no notice of and has no knowledge of any action, litigation, investigation or proceeding of any kind pending or threatened against the Property, and City knows of no facts which could give rise to any such action, litigation, investigation or proceeding. (g) The City is aware that a watering well may be located on the Property and will provide the required well disclosure statement required under Minnesota law. (h) The City has no actual knowledge of an "individual sewage treatment system" (as defined in Minnesota Statutes Section 115.5 5, subd. 1(g)) located on the Property. (i) The City has no actual knowledge of any leases, oral or written, affecting the Property nor any other right, title or interest in or to the Property granted to any 3 202046v4 third party except as otherwise shown on the survey to be provided under the terms of this Agreement. (j) The City certifies that, as of the date hereof, no methamphetamine production has occurred on the Property, pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 152.0275. (k) To the best of the City's knowledge, there has been no dumping or placement or burying of trash or construction debris in or on the Property. All representations and warranties shall survive Closing for a period of two (2) years. Section 2.2. Representations and Warranties by the Developer. The Developer represents and warrants that: (a) The Developer has the capacity to enter into this Agreement and to perform its obligations hereunder. (b) When the Property is conveyed to the Developer, the Developer will construct, operate and maintain the Minimum Improvements upon the Property in accordance with the terms of this Agreement, and all local, state and federal laws and regulations (including, but not limited to, environmental, zoning, building code and public health laws and regulations). (c) The Minimum Improvements will be constructed by the Developer, at its sole expense, in such manner, and at such expense as are necessary to make the Property usable by the Developer, including all such improvements as are necessary to make the residence on the Property comply with all applicable federal, state and local rules, regulations, ordinances and laws. (d) The Developer will use its best efforts to construct the Minimum Improvements in accordance with all local, state or federal energy -conservation laws or regulations. (e) The Developer will use its best efforts to obtain, in a timely manner, all required permits, licenses and approvals and to meet, in a timely manner, all requirements of all applicable local, state and federal laws and regulations which must be obtained or met before the Minimum Improvements may be lawfully constructed. (f) The Developer will cooperate with the City, and the City will cooperate with the Developer with respect to any litigation commenced with respect to the Property or the Minimum Improvements. (g) The Developer will construct the Minimum Improvements on the Property in accordance Exhibit B. E 202046A (h) Neither the execution and delivery of this Agreement, the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby, nor the fulfillment of or compliance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement is prevented, limited by or conflicts with, or results in a breach of, the terms, conditions or provisions of any corporate restriction or any evidences of indebtedness, agreement or instrument of whatever nature to which the Developer is now a party or by which it is bound or constitutes a default under any of the foregoing. All representations and warranties shall survive Closing. ARTICLE III. CONVEYANCE OF PROPERTY Section 3.1. Status of Property. Subject to the satisfaction of the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the City agrees to sell the Property to the Developer and the Developer agrees to purchase the Property from the City in "as -is" condition through the execution and delivery of a limited warranty deed containing a right of reversion as provided under Section 6.3 of this Agreement and conveying marketable title to the Property, subject to: (a) building and zoning laws, ordinances, state and federal regulations; (b) restrictions related to use or improvements of the Property do not affect Developer's intended use or improvement of the Property; (c) easements that do not interfere with Developer's intended improvements and use; (d) encroachments identified on any survey of the Property that do not interfere with Developer's intended improvements and use; (e) reservations of minerals or mineral rights to the State of Minnesota; and (f) any Permitted Encumbrances, as defined in Section 3.5 of this Agreement. 5 202046A Section 3.2. Conditions Precedent to Conveyance of Property. (a) The City's obligation to convey the Property shall be subject to the satisfaction of, or waiver in writing by the City of, all of the following conditions precedent: (i) The Developer not being in default under the terms of this Agreement; and (ii) The Developer having secured all governmental permits and approvals, including building permits necessary to be obtained in order to permit conveyance of the Property to Developer and construction of the Minimum Improvements. (b) The Developer shall be obligated to accept title to the Property subject to satisfaction, or waiver in writing by the Developer, of the following conditions precedent: (i) The City not being in default under the terms of this Agreement; (ii) The City has provided a survey of the Property; and (iii) Satisfaction with the results of any inspection of the Property conducted pursuant to Section 3.6 and the survey provided by the City. If the contingencies have not been satisfied or waived by the parties on or before Closing, then the respective party may elect to terminate this Agreement by written notice delivered to the other party not later than Closing. Upon such termination, neither party will have any further rights or obligations regarding this Agreement or the Property. If either party fails to terminate prior to Closing, then the contingencies pertaining to each such respective contingency shall be deemed waived by the party entitled to assert the contingency and the parties shall perform under this Agreement. If this Agreement is terminated as permitted under the terms of this Section, then upon request by City, City and Developer agree to sign a cancellation of this Agreement or Developer shall deliver a Quit Claim Deed to the Property to City. Developer agrees to diligently proceed to satisfy the conditions of this Section. Section 3.3. Purchase Price. The purchase price for the Property shall be payable by Developer in cash, certified funds or wire transfer paid to the City at Closing. Section 3.4. Closing. (a) Within ten (10) days after the satisfaction and/or waiver of all of the conditions contained in Section 3.2 of this Agreement, and in any event no later than May 319 2019 ("Closing Date") provided all conditions precedent for the City and Developer to close have either been met or waived, and the Developer pays the City the Purchase Price, the City shall convey the Property to the Developer through the execution and delivery of the Deed and all other documents 6 202046v4 reasonably required by Developer and the Title Company (as hereinafter defined). This closing shall be at a location mutually agreed upon by the parties. (b) The Developer shall take possession of the Property upon execution and delivery of the Deed by the City at closing. (c) The Deed shall be in recordable form and shall be promptly recorded along with this Agreement. (d) The Property must be combined under one tax identification number and combined as a single zoning lot of record and appropriate documentation filed and recorded with the County. (e) The utilities serving the Property shall be prorated to the date of Closing. (f) At Closing, the Developer shall pay: (i) title insurance premiums, if any; (ii) one-half of closing costs; (iii) the cost for any environmental investigation or tests by Developer; and (iv) all taxes payable in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. (g) At Closing, the City shall pay: (i) state deed tax relating to the conveyance of the Property and conservation fees; (ii) recording fees for corrective instruments required to remove encumbrances and place marketable title in Developer's name; (iii) costs of the survey of the Property; (iv) all taxes and assessments payable in accordance with this Agreement; and (v) all title insurance company fees for issuance of a title commitment. (h) All costs incidental to the Closing not otherwise specifically allocated under this Agreement shall be allocated in accordance with the custom and practice for similar transactions in Minnesota. Section 3.5. Title. The City shall within fifteen (15) days after the date of this Agreement, at its sole cost and expense, obtain a current commitment for the issuance of a ALTA Form B owner's policy of title insurance (the "Commitment") issued by a Preferred Title Inc. ("Title Company") committing to insure that Developer will have good and marketable title to the Property free and clear of all liens, restrictions, covenants and encumbrances except those liens, restrictions, covenants and encumbrances currently of record and otherwise identified in Section 3.1 (the "Permitted Encumbrances"). A mortgage, monetary lien or any other lien or encumbrance against the property shall be deemed to be a title objection. In the event any exceptions are listed in the Commitment (except for Permitted Encumbrances), if the City does 7 202046v4 not immediately remove the exceptions, the Developer shall have the right to waive such exceptions, in which event the Deed to be delivered at Closing shall except such objections, or terminate this Agreement as the Developer's sole and exclusive remedy and in such event neither the City nor the Developer shall have any obligations or liability to the other hereunder. Section 3.6. Physical Inspection. Developer and its agents will have the right, from time to time prior to the Closing, to enter upon the Property to examine the same and the condition thereof and to conduct such surveys and to make such engineering and other inspections, tests and studies as Developer determines to be reasonably necessary, all at Developer's sole cost and expense. Developer will conduct such examinations or surveys during normal business hours to the extent practicable. Developer will conduct all examinations and surveys of the Property in a manner that will not harm or damage the Property so that it cannot be restored to its prior condition or cause any claim adverse to the City and will restore the Property to its condition prior to any such examinations or surveys immediately after conducting the same. Developer will indemnify, defend, and hold the City harmless from and against any claims for injury or death to persons, damage to property or other losses, damages or claims, including, in each instance, reasonable attorneys' fees and litigation costs, arising out of any action of any person or firm entering the Property on Developer's behalf as aforesaid, which indemnity will survive the Closing and any termination of this Agreement without the Closing having occurred. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Developer will not be liable merely for the discovery of a pre-existing condition at the Property. Section 3.7. Charges to be Paid by Developer. Developer shall be responsible for all appropriate fees in connection with issuance of a building permit and the Minimum Improvements. Developer shall be responsible for any costs for repair or maintenance to City property caused by Developer's construction of the Minimum Improvements. Section 3.8. No Representation by the City. EXCEPT AS EXPRESSLY SET FORTH IN THIS AGREEMENT, IT IS UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED THAT THE CITY IS NOT MAKING AND HAS NOT MADE, AT ANY TIME, ANY WARRANTIES OR REPRESENTATIONS OF ANY KIND OR CHARACTER, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, WITH RESPECT TO THE PROPERTY, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OR REPRESENTATIONS AS TO HABITABILITY, MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, TITLE (OTHER THAN THE CITY'S LIMITED WARRANTY OF TITLE TO BE SET FORTH IN THE DEED), ZONING, TAX CONSEQUENCES, LATENT OR PATENT PHYSICAL OR ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS, UTILITIES, ACCESS, OPERATING HISTORY OR PROJECTIONS, VALUTION, GOVERNMENTAL APPROVALS, THE COMPLIANCE OF THE PROPERTY WITH GOVERNMENTAL LAWS, THE TRUTH, ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF ANY PROPERTY DATA OR OTHER INFORMATION PERTAINING TO THE PROPERTY DELIVERED TO DEVELOPER BY THE CITY OR ANY OTHER MATTER OR THING REGARDING THE PROPERTY. DEVELOPER ACKNOWLEDGES AND AGREES THAT UPON THE CLOSING OF THE TRANSACTION CONTEMPLATED BY THIS AGREEMENT, THE CITY SHALL SELL AND DEVELOPER SHALL ACCEPT THE PROPERTY "AS IS, WHERE IS, WITH ALL FAULTS". DEVELOPER HAS NOT RELIED 202046v4 AND WILL NOT RELY ON, AND THE CITY IS NOT LIABLE FOR OR BOUND BY, ANY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, GUARANTIES, STATEMENTS, REPRESENTATIONS, OR INFORMATION PERTAINING TO THE PROPERTY OR RELATING THERETO MADE OR FURNISHED BY THE CITY OR AGENT REPRESENTING OR PURPORTING TO REPRESENT THE CITY, TO WHOMEVER MADE OR GIVEN, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, ORALLY OR IN WRITING, UNLESS SPECIFICALLY SET FORTH IN THIS AGREEMENT. THE DEVELOPER REPRESENTS TO THE CITY THAT DEVELOPER HAS CONDUCTED, OR WILL HAVE HAD THE OPPORTUNITY TO CONDUCT PRIOR TO CLOSING, SUCH INVESTIGATIONS OF THE PROPERTY, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE PHYSICAL, ENVIRONMENTAL AND GEOTECHNICAL CONDITIONS THEREOF, AS DEVELOPER DEEMS NECESSARY TO SATISFY ITSELF OF THE CONDITION OF THE PROPERTY AND THE EXISTENCE OR NONEXISTENCE OR CURATIVE ACTION TO BE TAKEN WITH RESPECT TO ANY HAZARDOUS OR TOXIC SUBSTANCES OR MATERIALS ON, WITHIN, UNDER OR DISCHARGED FROM THE PROPERTY, AND WILL RELY SOLELY UPON SAME AND NOT UPON ANY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY OR ON BEHALF OF THE CITY. UPON CLOSING, DEVELOPER SHALL ASSUME THE RISK THAT ADVERSE MATTERS, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ADVERSE PHYSICAL, ENVIRONMENTAL AND GEOTECHNICAL CONDITIONS MAY HAVE BEEN REVEALED BY DEVELOPER'S INVESTIGATIONS, AND DEVELOPER, UPON CLOSING, SHALL BE DEEMED TO HAVE WAIVED, RELINQUISHED AND RELEASED THE CITY (AND THE CITY'S OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES AND AGENTS) FROM AND AGAINST ANY AND ALL CLAIMS, DEMANDS, CAUSES OF ACTION (INCLUDING CAUSES OF ACTION IN TORT) LOSSES, DAMAGES, LIABILITIES, COSTS AND EXPENSES (INCLUDING ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COURT COSTS) OF ANY AND EVERY KIND OR CHARACTER, KNOWN OR UNKNOWN, WHICH DEVELOPER MIGHT HAVE ASSERTED OR ALLEGED AGAINST THE CITY (AND THE CITY'S OFFICERS, DIRECTORS, SHAREHOLDER, EMPLOYEES AND AGENTS) AT ANY TIME BY REASON OF OR ARISING OUT OF ANY LATENT OR PATENT PHYSICAL CONDITIONS, VIOLATIONS OF ANY APPLICABLE LAWS) AND ANY AND ALL OTHER ACTS, OMISSIONS, EVENTS, CIRCUMSTANCES OR MATTERS REGARDING THE PROPERTY. The City and Developer agree that the provisions of this Section 3.8 shall survive the closing of the transaction contemplated by this Agreement. ARTICLE IV. CONSTRUCTION OF MINIMUM IMPROVEMENTS Section 4.1. Construction of Minimum Improvements. The Developer agrees that it will construct the Minimum Improvements on the Property in accordance with Proposal attached as Exhibit B and Monticello City Code Section 4, Chapter 1 ("Building Code"), and will operate E 202046v4 and maintain, preserve and keep the Minimum Improvements or cause the Minimum Improvements to be maintained, preserved and kept with the appurtenances and every part and parcel thereof in good repair and condition. Section 4.2. Construction of Minimum Improvements. The Developer shall substantially complete construction of the Minimum Improvements, except for minor "punch list items", within two (2) years of the date of this Agreement. Substantial completion shall mean the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, but shall not include a temporary certificate of occupancy. In the event of default under this Section, Developer shall reimburse the City $20,000.00 for the reduction in purchase price provided by the City to induce Developer to repair the residence on the Property. As security for the obligation under this Section, Developer shall deliver to the City at Closing a cash escrow in the amount of $20,000.00 ("Security") which must be maintained until November 30, 2021. The City may draw down the security for default under this Section. The Security shall be retained by the City until substantial completion of the Minimum Improvements in accordance with this Section, at which time the City will release the Security. In the event that the time period for completion of the Minimum Improvements is extended due to City authorization or an unavoidable delay, the Security must be extended or the City may draw it down prior to a lapse. Section 4.3. Construction Requirements. In constructing the Minimum Improvements, the Developer shall comply with all federal, state and local laws and regulations. ARTICLE V REAL PROPERTY TAXES Section 5.1 Taxes and Deferred Assessments. Except as otherwise provided herein, the City shall pay all general real estate taxes and installments of special assessments due and payable in the year prior to the Date of Closing and years prior thereto. The City and Developer shall prorate all general real estate taxes due and payable on the Property in the year in which the Date of Closing occurs on a per diem basis. Except as otherwise provided below, City shall pay on or before Closing all levied and pending special assessments associated with the Property as of the date of this Agreement. ARTICLE VI Events of Default Section 6.1. Events of Default Defined. The following shall be "Events of Default" under this Agreement and the term "Event of Default" shall mean, whenever it is used in this Agreement (unless the context otherwise provides), any one or more of the following events: (a) Failure by the Developer to pay when due any payments required to be paid under this Agreement or to pay when due ad valorem taxes on the Property. 10 202046v4 (b) Failure by the Developer to commence, diligently pursue and complete construction of the Minimum Improvements, or portions thereof, pursuant to the terms, conditions and limitations of this Agreement. (c) Failure by Developer to observe or perform any other covenant, condition, obligation or agreement on its part to be observed or performed hereunder. (d) The Developer does any of the following prior to completion of construction of the Minimum Improvements: (i) files any petition in bankruptcy or for any reorganization, arrangement, composition, readjustment, liquidation, dissolution, or similar relief under United States Bankruptcy Laws or any similar federal or state laws; or (ii) make an assignment for the benefit of its creditors; or (iii) admit, in writing, its inability to pay its debts generally as they become due; or (iv) be adjudicated, bankrupt or insolvent. (e) If any warranty or representation by the Developer in this Agreement is untrue in any material respect. (f) Failure by City to observe or perform any covenant, condition, obligation or agreement on its part to be observed or performed hereunder. (g) If any warranty or representation by the City in this Agreement is untrue in any material respect. Section 6.2. City's Remedies on Default. Whenever any Event of Default by Developer referred to in Section 6.1 of this Agreement occurs, the City may take any one or more of the following actions and unless otherwise provided such actions may be taken only after providing thirty (30) days written notice to the Developer of the Event of Default and the Event of Default has not been cured within said thirty (30) days or, if the Event of Default is by its nature incurable within thirty (30) days, the Developer does not provide assurances to the City reasonably satisfactory to the City that the Event of Default will be cured and will be cured as soon as reasonably possible: (a) Suspend its performance under the Agreement until it receives assurances from the Developer, deemed adequate by the City, that the Developer will cure its default and continue its performance under the Agreement. (b) Terminate this Agreement; (c) In the event of default by the Developer with respect to the Developer's obligation to complete the Minimum Improvements, the City may, at its option, draw on the Security without notice. If the City collects the Security, it is not entitled to the remedy under Section 6.3. 11 202046A (d) Take whatever action, including legal, equitable or administrative action, which may appear necessary or desirable to the City to collect any payments due or damages arising under this Agreement or to enforce performance and observance of any obligation, agreement, or covenant of the Developer under this Agreement. Section 6.3. Revesting Title in City Upon Happening of Event Subsequent to Conveyance to Developer. In the Event that subsequent to the execution and delivery of the Deed the Developer shall fail to complete construction of the Minimum Improvements in conformity with this Agreement and such failure shall not be cured within thirty (30) days after written notice to do so, or within a reasonable amount of time thereafter if Developer is diligently proceeding with the construction of the Minimum Improvements, then the City shall have the right to immediately re-enter and take possession of the Property and to terminate (and revest in the City) the estate conveyed by the Deed to the Developer, it being the intent of this provision, together with other provisions of the Agreement, that the conveyance of the Property to the Developer shall be made upon, and that the Deed shall contain a condition subsequent to the effect that in the event of any default on the part of the Developer and failure on the part of the Developer to remedy, end, or abrogate such default within the period and in the manner stated in such subdivisions, the City at its option may declare a termination in favor the City of the title, and all of the rights and interests in and to the Property conveyed to the Developer, and that such title and all rights and interests of the Developer, and any assigns or successors in interest to and in the Property, shall revert to the City. If Developer provides a title commitment and warranty deed to the Property in lieu of reversion, the City shall pay to Developer 90% of that portion of the Purchase Price actually paid by Developer to the City. The warranty deed shall convey fee title to the Property to Developer, subject only to the encumbrances identified under Section 3.1 of this Agreement. The title commitment required under this section shall be a current commitment for the issuance of an ALTA Form B owner's policy of title insurance issued by Title Company committing to insure good and marketable title to the Property in favor of the City. A deed of trust, mortgage, monetary lien or any other lien or encumbrance against the Property shall be deemed to be a title objection. Upon request, the City shall release the right of revertor if the Minimum Improvements are completed and a certificate of occupancy or temporary certificate of occupancy have been issued for the Property. Section 6.4. No Remedy Exclusive. Except as otherwise provided, no remedy herein conferred upon or reserved to the City is intended to be exclusive of any other available remedy or remedies, but each and every such remedy shall be cumulative and shall be in addition to every other remedy given under this Agreement or now or hereafter existing at law or in equity or by statute. No delay or omission to exercise any right or power accruing upon any default shall impair any such right or power or shall be construed to be a waiver thereof, but any such right and power may be exercised from time to time and as often as may be deemed expedient. Section 6.5. Developer's Remedies on Default. Whenever any Event of Default by City referred to in Section 6.1 of this Agreement occurs, the Developer may take any one or more of the following actions and unless otherwise provided such actions may be taken only after providing thirty (30) days written notice to the City of the Event of Default and the Event of Default has not been cured within said thirty (30) days or, if the Event of Default is by its nature 12 202046v4 incurable within thirty (30) days, the City does not provide assurances to the Developer reasonably satisfactory to the Developer that the Event of Default will be cured and will be cured as soon as reasonably possible: (a) Up to the Closing: (i) suspend its performance under the Agreement until it receives assurances from the City, deemed adequate by the Developer, that the City will cure its default and continue its performance under the Agreement; or (ii) terminate this Agreement; or (b) Take whatever action, including legal, equitable or administrative action, which may appear necessary or desirable to the Developer to collect any damages arising under this Agreement or to enforce performance and observance of any obligation, agreement, or covenant of the City under this Agreement. ARTICLE VII. ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS Section 7.1. Certificate of Completion. Promptly after substantial completion of the Minimum Improvements in accordance with those provisions of this Agreement, the City will furnish Developer with a certificate of completion substantially in the form shown at Exhibit "C" (the "Certificate of Completion"). Such certification by the City shall be a conclusive determination of satisfaction and termination of the agreements and covenants in this Agreement with respect to the obligations of Developer, and its successors and assigns, to construct the Minimum Improvements, and shall operate to forever waive the City's interest in the Property, including the right of reverter. If the City shall refuse or fail to provide any certification in accordance with the provisions of this Section 7.1, the City shall, upon demand, provide Developer with a written statement, indicating in adequate detail in what respect Developer has failed to complete the Minimum Improvements in accordance with the provision of this Agreement, or is otherwise in default, and what measures or acts will be necessary, in the opinion of the City, for Developer to take or perform in order to obtain such certification. Upon Developer's completion of the items so described by the City, the City shall deliver a fully executed Certificate of Completion to Developer. Section 7.2 Prohibition Against Transfer of Property and Assignment of Agreement. Except only by way of security for, and only for the purpose of obtaining financing necessary to enable the Developer or any successor in interest to the Property, or any part thereof, to perform its obligations with respect to the Development under this Agreement, and any other purpose authorized by this Agreement, the Developer, except as so authorized, has not made or created, and that it will not prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Completion by the City make or create, or suffer to be made or created, any total or partial sale, assignment, 13 202046v4 conveyance, or any trust in respect to this Agreement or the Property or any part thereof or any interest therein, or any contract or agreement to do any of the same, without the prior written approval of the City. The Developer may enter into a purchase agreement to sell the property before the Certificate of Completion is issued, but can not sell until the Certificate of Completion is issued. Section 7.3. Restrictions on Use. The Developer agrees for itself and its successors and assigns and every successor in interest to the Property, or any part thereof, that the Developer and such successors and assigns shall devote the Property to, and only to, and in accordance with, the uses specified in the City Code. Section 7.4. Conflicts of Interest. No member of the governing body or other official of the City shall have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, the Project or any contract, agreement or other transaction contemplated to occur or be undertaken thereunder or with respect thereto, nor shall any such member of the governing body or other official participate in any decision relating to the Agreement which affects his personal interest or the interest of any corporation, partnership or association in which he is, directly or indirectly, interested. No member, official or employee of the City shall be personally liable to the Developer or any successors in interest, in the event of any default or breach by the City or for any amount which may become due to the Developer or successor or on any obligations under the terms of the Agreement. Section 7.5. Waiver and Release by Developer. The Developer hereby waives, releases and forever discharges the City from any claim for costs incurred in preliminary plans, specifications, site testing improvements, professional fees or legal fees in connection with the Project. Section 7.6. Titles of Articles and Sections. Any titles of the several parts, Articles and Sections of this Agreement are inserted for convenience of reference only and shall be disregarded in construing or interpreting any of its provisions. Section 7.7. Notices and Demands. Except as otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement, a notice, demand or other communication under the Agreement by either party to the other shall be sufficiently given or delivered if it is dispatched by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested or delivered personally; and (a) In the case of the Developer, is addressed or delivered personally to: Charles Maue 24665 141St Avenue North Rogers, Minnesota 55374 14 202046v4 (b) In the case of the City, is addressed or delivered personally to: City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street Monticello, Minnesota, 55362 Attn: City Administrator with a copy to: Andrea McDowell Poehler CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association Grand Oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (651) 452-5000 (c) Either Party may, upon written notice to the other Party, change the address to which such notices and demands are made. Section 7.8. Disclaimer of Relationship. The Developer acknowledges that nothing contained in this Agreement nor any act by the City or the Developer shall be deemed or construed by the Developer or any third person to create any relationship of third -party beneficiary, principal and agent, limited or general partner or joint venture between the City and the Developer. Section 7.9. Covenants Running with the Land. The terms and provisions of this Agreement shall be deemed to be covenants running with the Property and shall be binding upon any successors or assigns of the Developer and any future owners or encumbrancers of the Property. Section 7.10. Counterparts. This Agreement is executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall constitute one and the same instrument. Section 7.11. Law Governing. This Agreement will be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of Minnesota. Section 7.12. Facsimile Signature. The parties hereto acknowledge and agree that in order to expedite the signing of this Agreement and the processing, and review and compliance with the terms hereof, the parties may utilize facsimile equipment to transmit and convey signatures hereto and such other information as may be necessary. With respect to any such transmission bearing a signature for any party hereto and on which the receiver is or may be reasonably expected to rely, than if such a facsimile transmission is corroborated by regular facsimile printout showing the telephone number from which transmitted together with a date and time of transmission, it shall be binding on the sending party and may be relied upon by the 15 202046v4 party receiving the same. The sending party hereby acknowledges such reliance and weighs any defenses to the use of such documents or signatures. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City has caused this Agreement to be duly executed in its name and behalf, and the Developer has caused this Agreement to be duly executed in its name and behalf, on or as of the date first above written. [Remainder of page intentinally left blank.] [Signature pages to follow.] 16 202046A CITY OF MONTICELLO 0 am STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF WRIGHT ) Brian Stumpf, Its Mayor Jeff O'Neill, Its City Administrator The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2019, by Brian Stumpf and Jeff O'Neill, respectively, the Mayor and City Administrator, of the City of Monticello, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on its behalf. Notary Public 17 202046v4 DEVELOPER: 6harles A. Maue STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF WRIGHT ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2019, by Charles A. Maue, a single individual. Notary Public VICKI JAN LEERNOFF u= s, = . {4OTARY PUBLIC MINNESOTA +` My�nmissionEVII 01R11f2021 DRAFTED BY: Cambpell Knutson Professional Association Grand Oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (651) 452-5000 18 202046A EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY Lots 5, 6, 7 and 8, and the South 5 feet of Lots 9 and 10, Block 46, Original Plat of Monticello, Wright County, Minnesota, according to the recorded plat thereof. PID: 155010046050 202046v4 EXHIBIT "B" CITY REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL AND DEVELOPER PROPOSAL 202046A EXHIBIT "C' CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION The undersigned hereby certifies that Charles A. Maue, a single individual ("Developer") has fully complied with its obligations to construct the Minimum Improvements under that document titled Contract for Private Development dated , 2019, by and between the City of Monticello (the "City") and Developer, and that Developer is released and forever discharged from its obligations under the Agreement with respect to the obligations of Developer, and its successors and assigns, to construct the Minimum Improvements, and the City waives any right, title or interest it may have in the Property, including a right of reverter. The Wright County Recorder's Office is hereby authorized to accept for recording the filing of this instrument, to be a conclusive determination of the satisfaction and termination of the covenants and conditions of the Contract for Private Development described above. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City has caused this Certificate to be duly executed in its name and behalf on or as of the date first above -written. CITY OF MONTICELLO 0 0 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF WRIGHT ) Brian Stumpf, Its Mayor Jeff O'Neill, Its City Administrator The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2019, by Brian Stumpf and Jeff O'Neil, respectively, the Mayor and City Administrator, of the City of Monticello, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on its behalf. Notary Public 202046v4 City Council Agenda: 05/13/2019 2R. Consideration of authorizing USAcivatics to provide aquatic consulting, engineering, and design services associated with the replacement of the existing flume waterslide at the Monticello Communitv Center for $13,068 (AM) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: City Council is asked to consider authorizing aquatic consulting, engineering, and design services associated with the replacement of the existing flume waterslide at the Monticello Community Center. Funding for this project is available in the community center budget. The city is seeking construction management for our waterslide replacement project. The existing waterslide was installed in 1999 when the building was first constructed. Concerns have been expressed in recent vessel inspections prompting staffs' desire to replace the slide vessel. We are looking to replacement the flume/slide vessel due to the end -of -life of the fiberglass slide body. Typical lifespan of a fiberglass slide is 20 years. We will evaluate the integrity of the existing waterslide support structure, platform and stairs for potential reuse. Further considerations evident in the 2010 inspection report provided by Signature Aquatics are the last left-hand turn is a concern for user safety; users have reported minor injuries resulting from a combination of speed and turn radius. Construction is expected to begin September 2, 2019 and achieve completion by November 1, 2019. The following scope of services is meant to provide the City with a new flume waterslide at the Monticello Community Center. The scope of services includes: 1. Site evaluation with examination of existing structure and adjacent structures and surfaces 2. Pre -design kick-off meeting with City staff to discuss project scope and intention 3. Cost estimates for all work proposed 4. Plans including specifications with process review sets for City review 5. Presentation of final bidding documents and final project estimate for City approval 6. Coordination and handling of bidding and award process 7. Coordination of permit process 8. Construction administration and inspection to ensure work is completed according to plans and specifications 9. Construction inspections to ensure work product quality expectations are met 10. Closeout inspections and project closeout procedure handling to ensure all work is competed and finalized to start warranty period 11. Warranty inspection to be performed 30 days before the end of the warranty period The city received one response to our request for proposal for aquatic design and engineering services, replacement project coordination and project management services. The following table lists all the quotes received for the professional services. City Council Agenda: 05/13/2019 Quotes for Project Management Services CONTRACTOR TOTAL QUOTE USAquatics $13,068 It is recommended to award the project to USAquatics in the amount of $13,068, as their quote is the sole responsive and responsible satisfying all requested requirements. USAquatics is a prominent aquatics consulting, design, and engineering firm with a portfolio representing over $850 million in aquatic projects as of 2018. There are a limited number of aquatic firms in the area with the necessary qualifications, so it is not unusual to receive just one proposal. Al. Budget Impact: The 2019 MCC budget includes $150,000 for the waterslide replacement project. The study amount of $13,068 is to be drawn from the $150,000 budget amount. A2. Staff Workload Impact: Staff time will include overseeing the project and working with the contractor to finalize the project. A3. Strategic Plan Impact: Strategic Goals: • Create & Preserve Sustainable Livability • Build a Connected Community • Strengthen a Vibrant Economy • Be a Regional Leader • Invest in People B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Consideration of accepting quotes and awarding the contract to USAquatics in the amount of $13,068 for aquatic design and engineering services by the lowest bidder as identified in the previous table. 2. Motion to deny. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends Alternative 1. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Response to Request for Proposal B. Waterslide Inspection Report C. 2019 Waterslide RFP D. Existing Waterslide Picture - UATIIJLSA(�_ .. - a 1 •�J -' ' _• AQUATIC CONSULT'II�TG, ENGINEERING & DESIGN ®ii-lw� 76 ®ii-lw� I 4* go WN Tflo� r Wl_ E �14 . I -roll, ------ ..... �14 . I TABLE OF CONTENT h�h TABLE OF CONTENT INTRODUCTION LETTER THE COMPANY PROJECT UNDERSTANDING PROJECT APPROACH THE PROJECT PLAN OUR TEAM THE PROJECT TEAM REFERENCES PROJECT SCHEDULE & FEE APPENDIX AND ATTACHMENTS 124 BRIDGE AVE. E, PO BOX 86, DELANO, MN 55328 • (763) 972-5897 • INFO@USAQUATICSINC.COM USAQUATICS 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 11 12 13 1 USAQ ATIU CS SNL. tttt AQUATIC CONSULTING, ENGINEERING & DESIGN City of Monticello Ann Mosack ann.mosack@ci.monticello.mn.us May 16, 2019 We're excited for this opportunity to work with, and for the City of Monticello and the Monticello Community Center. We understand that your project is very important to your facility users and your entire community. USAquatics is a prominent aquatics consulting, design and engineering firm established in 1991 and have 100+ years of combined aquatic experience. We bring our national level of aquatic center and design experience to projects, including a large variety of indoor and outdoor facilities, from aquatic feasibility study through construction, to meet all recreational and leisure requirements. Our structural engineers have extensive experience working both on behalf of end-user clients and manufacturer/ providers. They have performed many designs for new and existing structures. Our experience in retro -fitting new fiberglass slide bodies on existing structures is unparalleled. We have included references for several clients who can attest to our experience and the quality of our work. USAquatics is in compliance with all State and Federal laws and can provide licensed engineering in all U.S. states as well as many Canadian provinces and territories. We're very anxious to take the next step to further share our qualifications with you and to further discuss potential projects and the value that USAquatics can uniquely add. Respectfully submitted and signed in regard to all statements and fees herein, Richard Shaffer, Partner, President, Project Coordinator — USAquatics Inc. 124 Bridge Ave. East Delano, MN 55328 (763) 972-5897 rick@usaquaticsinc.com 2 124 BRIDGE AVE. E, PO BOX 86, DELANO, MN 55328 • (763) 972-5897 • INFO@USAQUATICSINC.COM 7VWe hold awards for innovative and sustain - able design. Our designs have been featured in publications as showpiece examples. Assessing the needs of the client is first among our priorities. We believe the stake- holders are the most important member of the project team. We are trend setters. We combine old age experience with new age creativity to find improved solutions to every design challenge we encounter. •` �' : We are unique in the industry for having structural/civil engineers that are well versed in all aspects of aquatic design. We are trend setters in sustainable aquatic ®� design, with the first outdoor LEED certi- fied pool facility located in Minnesota that won a governors award. 4JOur designs are capital and operational bud- get friendly. Efficiency in design and equip - ment selections leads to overall cost savings. SAQUATICs THE COMPANY USAquatics, Inc. is a prominent aquatics consulting, design and engineering firm. Established in 1991, USAquatics gives pool owners and operators an independent source of information and design resources which have the owner's best interest in mind. We have 100+ years of combined experience in the industry that we utilize in every consultation and design project. As of 2018 our portfolio represents over $850 million in aquatic projects. The Design Philosophy at USAquatics, Inc. is centered and focused on the Facility Stakeholders. The owner becomes an integral part of the design team; working with the designers to determine the best possible design and specification. USAquatics, Inc. uses an approach to designs and renovations which create new and innovative trends and layouts. The layouts and features of the facilities are dictated by the client's aquatic programming needs. USAquatics, Inc. "hands on" experience with state-of-the-art equipment will provide a cost effective, efficient, and low maintenance aquatic facility. We have operated facilities for our clients and not only is everyone on our staff either a Certified Pool Operator (C.P.O. - through the National Spa & Pool Institute) and / or an Aquatic Facility Operator (A.F.O. - through the National Recreation and Park Association), with CPO instructors on our staff. Prior to your facility opening, we can train and prepare staff for everything from water chemistry to life guarding. 124 BRIDGE AVE. E, PO BOX 86, DELANO, MN 55328 • (763) 972-5897 • INFO@USAQUATICSINC.COM 3 USAQUATICS PROJECT UNDERSTANDING 4 BACKGROUND • The Monticello Community Center indoor pool was constructed in 1999 • The Aquatic design was performed by USAquatics, Inc. • The flume slide was installed in 1999 and is original to the facility • In 2010 a report examining the flume slide was completed by Signature Aquatics • Subsequent to the report, Signature Aquatics replaced the stair structure, addressed slope/ drainage issues at the top platform and made several repairs to the flume body • Air quality issues have been addressed at the facility that had previously contributed to steel structure deterioration I i4. '---� rc LGA qto mom zeoo PMTH L 124 BRIDGE AVE. E, PO BOX 86, DELANO, MN 55328 • (763) 972-5897 • INFO@USAQUATICSINC.COM OVERVIEW Primary among the concerns stated regarding the slide are: • The integrity of the existing waterslide support structure, platform and stairs • End -of -life of the fiberglass slide body The City of Monticello wishes to hire a professional to: • Examine the existing structure for potential reuse • Examine the stair structure and all other related areas/ structures • Examine the potential removal of the fiberglass slide body and identify the implications of the removal and affect on adjacent structures and finishes • Provide design documentation for the removal and replacement of the fiberglass slide body • If possible; preserve the existing steel structural support for reuse • If reuse of the existing structure is not possible a this is to be identified along with potential budget implications • Provide planning for connection of the existing water supply and return system • Provide planning for the restoration of existing adjacent structures and finishes affected by the flume slide replacement • Plan for remediation of any other items noted during initial inspection The project considerations are: • The total Capital Improvement Plan estimate for all work, including professional fees and ancillary costs, is $150.000 • Construction is to take place between September 2, 2019 and November 1, 2019 Further considerations evident in the 2010 inspection report provided by Signature Aquatics are: • The last left hand turn is a concern for user safety; users have reported minor injuries resulting from a combination of speed and turn radius SAQUAT1cs SCOPE OF SERVICES • Site evaluation with examination of existing structure and adjacent structures and surfaces • Pre -design kick-off meeting with City of Monticello to discuss project scope and intention • Cost estimates for all work proposed • Plans including specifications with progress review sets for City of Monticello review • Presentation of final bidding documents and final project estimate for City of Monticello approval • Coordination and handling of bidding and award process • Coordination of permit process • Construction administration and inspection to ensure work is completed according to plans and specifications • Construction inspections to ensure work product quality expectations a.:, ... et • Closeout inspection and project closeout procedure handling to ensure all work is completed and finalized to start warranty period • Warranty inspection to be performed 30 days before the end of the warranty period 124 BRIDGE AVE. E, PO BOX 86, DELANO, MN 55328 • (763) 972-5897 • INFO@USAQUATICSINC.COM 5 USAQUATIC3 PROJECT APPROACH USAquatics, Inc. uses a top-down, team approach that incorporates the stakeholders. It is crucial that the owner be involved in the work process and it is equally crucial that the professionals performing their work listen and head the interests of the owner and various stakeholders. USAquatics was founded on this idea as an approach to all that we do. Program, Plan, Design Programming always comes first. This is a top- down methodology that identifies the end needs before planning a path to achieve those ends. The Team Dynamic We believe in the idea of the team. Each member has a role and the whole must be a cohesive group to ensure results equitable to the stakeholders. The Monticello Community Center is important to the community and its indoor pool facility is a valuable part of that community space. We will carefully listen to the owners to help determine the best course of action that will preserve the assets of this facility. Feedback and Follow Through Communication, coordination and collaboration are key factors to any successful endeavor. USAquatics will offer opportunities for feedback and we will incorporate what we here into the flume slide replacement design so that the owner can examine and offer additional feedback. This is a revolving theme throughout the process. Goals and Objectives Project needs, goals and objectives are important to understand. The program intention for a flume slide replacement is to preserve a key feature in the Monticello Community Center aquatic venue. We understand that there will be additional goals, priorities and objectives that will need to be identified so that we can deliver a project that meets all expectations. EARLY IDENTIFICATION OF POTENTIAL ISSUES USAquatics is well aware that problems can arise in any project. Quick identification, planning and adaptation is key to resolving issues. Anticipating potential issues reduces impact to the project delivery. • The entire slide is a Miracle Recreation design that has not been manufactured in some time. • The steel structure is old and adapting it to a new flume slide body will be as critical as its condition. USAquatics will examine the structure and the connection between the flume body and the steel structure. We will compare this with several supplier details to determine the best means of matching a new flume body to this structure. If there are problems at this stage we will develop a plan for accommodation and/ or partial replacement. • The plumbing connection at the start of the 1 - Program 2 - Planning 3 - Design 6 124 BRIDGE AVE. E, PO BOX 86, DELANO, MN 55328 • (763) 972-5897 • INFO@USAQUATICSINC.COM USAQuA lcs THE PROJECT PLAN A - Project Kick -Off The kick-off meeting is about more than introductions. We will ask and answer questions. We will learn about concerns the owners have for the project and frame an understanding of the project from your view. Along with the owners representatives, we will make initial examinations of the slide and its structure. We will be watching and listening to the concerns regarding the flume slide, its structure and the facility it connects with. We will examine the flume body, the structure and all adjacent structures, finishes and components that may be affected. We will take a look at the mechanical systems and connections. Examination of the steel structure will be of critical importance. Before leaving, we will understand what needs to take place. Just as important, the owner will understand the process and the plan going forward. B - Planning and Assessment USAquatics will begin planning the project. We will use data gathered during the kick-off meeting, existing plans and original submittal information on file at our office to begin planning. We will draw on our experience and relationships with industry manufacturers to plan the most efficient possible construction approach. Our experienced team includes the industries leading structural design expert who will draw on experience and knowledge to make sure that what we plan makes sense and is feasible from a manufacture and installation standpoint. Dan Roseman understands, having performed design services directly for most of the industries manufacturers, how these structures are manufactured and assembled. C - Mid -Plan Review Once we have assembled a plan, including visuals and narratives, we will return to the owner for another team meeting. We will examine a 60% review set and compare it to the goals and priorities established during the kick-off meeting. At this stage, stakeholder feedback is just as important as it was during the kick-off meeting. The constant involvement and return to the owner is how we keep you involved and a part of the process. D - Plan Refinement USAquatics will use feedback from the owner to further refine and work toward completion of the replacement design documentation. E - Final -plan review When the design is 90% complete, USAquatics will present a copy for approval by the City of Monticello. We will offer any further explanations and listen carefully to owner feedback so that we can make any final adjustments needed. F - Bidding and award USAquatics will coordinate the publication of the advertisement for bid and the bidding documents. By this time, USAquatics will have already made industry suppliers aware of the project. We will use our considerable industry relationships and connections to generate interest in the work, attracting bidders to the project. We will contact qualified providers to generate interest in the project. We hear feedback from the providers and incorporate clarifications into the bidding documents via addenda. Once bids are opened, will examine responsive proposals and recommend an award to a qualified supplier. G - Construction We will work with the owner, the selected supplier and the city to arrange all proper permits and get the construction process underway. We will be on hand during the construction process and we will visit the project to examine the progress against the plans. We will hold discussions with the owner concerning the progress and address any concerns. We will perform final inspections of the work and list any deficiencies for correction. Our schedule allows for examination before the completion date so that the supplier can address concerns and correct deficiencies. H - Warranty USAquatics will remain available to address concerns that arise during use of your new feature. We will also be available to perform an inspection one month before the end of the warranty period so that we can 124 BRIDGE AVE. E, PO BOX 86, DELANO, MN 55328 • (763) 972-5897 • INFO@USAQUATICSINC.COM 7 USAQUATICS rrr OUR TEAM Our staff have been involved in thousands of aquatic facilities, giving our small business associates a thorough understanding of aquatics, from conception and design development, through operation of your facility. We are experienced in early every aspect of aquatics: • Facility Service and Operations • Construction and Construction Management • Facility Planning and Design • Aquatic Design and Engineering • Feature Design and Engineering Tom Schaffer Founder Senior Consultant Lead Project Consultant Rick Schaffer 7DDesigpw"n Tea Partner/President Senior Project Coordinator Project Oversight Cody Buckley Project Engineer Project Engineer Dan Roseman Partner Director of Engineering Ir Lead Engineer Paul Schaffer Project Coordinator Project Coordinator 8 124 BRIDGE AVE. E, PO BOX 86, DELANO, MN 55328 • (763) 972-5897 • INFOOUSAQUATICSINC.COM THE PROJECT ' Y��+ TEAM Rick Schaffer Paul Schaffer Senior Project Coordinator 11 Project Coordinator Rick has been in the aquatic industry Paul grew up in the aquatic industry since 1992, joining his father in an and has worked for a few of the effort to grow an aquatic design and ®s major pool builders in Minnesota. consulting firm. Drawing on prior His knowledge of pool construction construction experience, Rick started in technical design is put to use at USAquatics for document quality with a focus on construction detail. Rick's experience control, improved bidding documentation, construction has expanded to fill many aspects of the aquatics observation and support for our design engineers. His industry from early design and assessment to project knowledge of the construction techniques, processes and management, with experience in everything from facility plan review has allowed us to improve the quality of operations to design and consulting services. information; thus improving bid results and smoothing the construction process for our many clients. Paul's experience and knowledge continues to expand with every project he is involved with. Education: • AAS Architectural Drafting and Design, Northwest Technical Institute • BS Business Administration, University of Phoenix • MS Architecture, San Francisco Institute of Architecture Relevant Experience: • YMCA Pool St. Cloud, MN • Parkers Prairie, MN Municipal • Pine Island, MN Municipal • Original designer for the Monticello Community Center Indoor Pool Affiliations: • Delano Area Education Foundation • Lions International • Toastmasters International Years of Experience: • 26 Years Relevant Experience: • Pool construction for AquaLogic pool builders • Pool construction for Global Specialties pool builders • Supervision of the construction of the Pine Island Municipal Aquatic Center • Construction foreman • Aquatic structure installation crew foreman Years of Experience: • 10 years Project Relevance: Project Oversight Project Relevance: Project Coordinator Similar project design experience; project management Flume Slide Installations; Various locations; Various experience manufacturers - see references Rick knows the Monticello Community Center very Paul has performed many slide installations, inspec- well and has worked with many projects having simi- tions, renovations and replacements lar design criteria 124 BRIDGE AVE. E, PO BOX 86, DELANO, MN 55328 • (763) 972-5897 • INFO@USAQUATICSINC.COM 9 USAQUA lcs Dan Roseman P.E. Director of Engineering Dan found his calling for aquatics in 2002 and has since provided designs for 12 waterslide manufacturers, 4 water feature manufacturers, a skate park manufacturer, and a roller coaster manufacturer. Dan brings design and project management experience, and an extensive background designing a variety of pools, spas, aquatic facilities, and recreation facilities. Dan has a strong understanding of structure and hydraulics, a comprehensive knowledge of construction practices and a thorough understanding of construction materials. Dan has an ability to merge an appreciation for structural integrity with the understanding for economical, efficient aquatic design. Education: • MS Education, Webster University • MS Computer Management,Webster University • BS Civil Engineering (Structural, Missouri University of Science and Technology Relevant Experience: • Structural design and certification of water slides and aquatic structures for all major slide manufacturers world- wide Qualifications: • Professional Engineer • Structural Engineer Years of Experience: • 17 Years Project Relevance: Lead Engine Similar project structural engineer; Existing structure evaluation and assessments Dan has extensive experience both with new flume slide design and in replacements including projects where the existing structure was reused Cody Buckley P.E. �- Project Engineer Cody has applied this civil/structural background in the design and management of a variety of projects including: multi -story hotels, water treatment facilities, and structural condition assessments. However, he developed a passion for projects in the aquatic and amusement industries due to their challenging propensity for requiring both breadth of knowledge and experience. Some of his favorite projects include: the design of free standing structural support for monorail roller coasters, iteration and structural design for an aquatic therapy center, and structural design of aquatic play structures aboard cruise ships. Whatever idea a client has, Cody looks forward to helping make it reality. Education: • MS Architectural Engineering — University of Nebraska - Lincoln; 2015 • MS Civil Engineering — University of Nebraska - Lincoln; 2015 • BS Civil Engineering — University of Evansville; 2009 Relevant Experience: • Structural design and certification of water slides and aquatic structures for all major American slide manufacturers Qualifications: • LEED Green Associate • Professional Engineer • Structural Engineer Years of Experience: • 7 Years er Project Relevance: Project Engineer Similar project structural engineering Cody was trained under Dan anu nas extensive experi- ence both with new flume slide design and in replace- ments including projects where the existing structure was reused 10 124 BRIDGE AVE. E, PO BOX 86, DELANO, MN 55328 • (763) 972-5897 • INFO @USAQUATICSINC.COM PRODUCT MANUFACTURERS: Recreation By Lemmie Jones Lemmie Jones: (417) 793-1613 Services Provided • Design and Engineering services • Installation Services • Various Projects across the United States Key Personel • Dan Roseman/Cody Buckley - Engineering • Paul Schaffer/Rick Schaffer - Installation & Coordination Klarer North America Steve Levine: (760) 899-2072 Services Provided • Design and Engineering services • Installation Services • Various Projects across the United States Key Personel • Dan Roseman/Cody Buckley - Engineering • Paul Schaffer/Rick Schaffer - Installation & Coordination CONTRACTORS: Kansas Citv Gunite Mason Banks: (816) 365-3643 Design and engineering work for similar projects in the Kansas City area Services Provided • Design & Engineering Key Personel • Dan Roseman/Cody Buckley - Engineering MUNICIPAL FACILITIES Hutchinson Aauatic Center Dolf Moon: (320) 234-5637 Design of a new outdoor municipal aquatic facility Services Provided • Design and Engineering services • Construction Administration/Coordination Key Personel • Rick Schaffer - Design & Project Coordination USAQUA lcs REFERENCES Parker's Prairie Aauatic Center Design of a new outdoor municipal aquatic facility Services Provided • Design and Engineering services • Construction Administration/Coordination Key Personel • Rick Schaffer - Design & Project Coordination • Paul Schaffer - Construction Coordination St. Cloud Area YMCA Greg Gack: (320) 253-2664 Design of a new indoor municipal/YMCA aquatic facility Services Provided • Design and Engineering services • Construction Administration Key Personel • Rick Schaffer - Design & Project Coordination PROFESSIONAL REFERENCES Webber Recreational Desian Jay Webber: (612) 581-4704 Jay has worked with us on many projects both as a provider and as a client 124 BRIDGE AVE. E, PO BOX 86, DELANO, MN 55328 • (763) 972-5897 • INFO@USAQUATICSINC.COM 11 USAQuATiCs PROJECT SCHEDULE &FEE PROJECT SCHEDULE It is expected that various meetings, inspections and discussions will take place throughout the project cycle. These represent major and minor milestone events: • May 16, 2019: Proposal submission • May 20, 2019: Design contract approval and award • May 28, 2019: Project kick-off meeting and inspection • June 11, 2019: Submission of 60% set for city review and approval • June 20, 2019: Submission of 90% set for city review and approval • July 2, 2019: Final city review and approval of bidding documents • July 9, 2019: Bid document publication • July 23, 2019: Pre-bid meeting and inspection • July 30, 2019: Bid opening • August 1, 2019: Award • August 6, 2019: Pre -Construction Meeting (start of fabrication lead time) • September 2, 2019 Construction Start • September 16, 2019 Construction early progress inspection • September 30, 2019 Construction mid progress inspection • October 18, 2019: Construction pre -closeout inspection • October 25, 2019: Construction closeout inspection • October 31, 2019: Construction final closeout PROJECT ESTIMATE Desciriptian Base AN Demolition Slicle clemo 1O,0U0 Section Total: 10000 Fabrication Flume slide body 47700 Structural modifications 5;000 Section Totol: S 52700 I n sta l lat ion S (1,000) Reuse of existing structure (20,00)) Structural modifications 15,000 Flume installation $ 21,600 Hardwore & incidentals 5;000 Freight 3,500 Adjocent modificotions 7,500 Resforotions 3,500 Pool 1 Totol: S 56,100 S (20 00) T ota Is Construction Su 6tota1 $ Other costs General conditions Contingency Section Total: CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL SA costs Prof. fees Regulatory Fees Section Totol: Tata) Project Costs PROJECT FEE STATEMENT 118,800 $ (21DA*M 5,940 S (1,000) 5,940 0 8) 130,640 $ (22AOM 13,068 s - 4,574 17,642 S 14a,322 S 126,322 USAquatics proposes to complete the work described herein per the requested terms of the RFP for a total fee of: $13,068 The project estimate includes regulatory fees 12 124 BRIDGE AVE. E, PO BOX 86, DELANO, MN 55328 • (763) 972-5897 • INFOOUSAQUATICSINC.COM USAQUATICS APPENDIX AND Ar-lACHMENTS ST. CLOUD YMCA PROJECT SHEET SCHEDULE OFF FEES AND VALUES INDEX OF PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY INSURANCE GENERAL LIABILITY INSURANCE At"'IACHMENTS F- 124 BRIDGE AVE. E, PO BOX 86, DELANO, MN 55328 • (763) 972-5897 • INFO@USAQUATICSINC.COM 13 ZI Ilk USAQUATICSS ST. CLOUD YMCA ST. CLOUD, MN Study/Planning - 2001/02; Construction 2002/03 Opened 2017, broke ground May 2002 Total Contract: $65,000 USAquatics was hired to design the aquatics portion of the facility, which includes an 8 -lane lap pool designed for recreational lap swimming, swim lessons and various other classes. There is also a zero -depth entry leisure pool with interactive play structures, a tot slide and a flume water slide. There is also a lazy river and a 10 -person hot water spa providing enjoyment and relaxation to a wide range of ages. Contact: Greg Gack St. Cloud Area Family YMCA 1530 Northway Drive St. Cloud, MN 56303 greg@scymca.org 320-253-2664 t Construction cost of aquatics portion of project: $2,000,000 E usaQUAT*ICs tttt" PERSONNEL CHARGES 2019 Schedule of Fees and Values Time for the required performance of the Scope of Work, other than as included in contract, will be charged the Unit Price Hourly Rates stated below: Labor Classification Hourly Rate Administrative $105.00 Drafter/Gadd Operator 165.00 Technician, Junior Associate, Project Inspector, Project Manager 185.00 Consulting Professional, Senior Associate, Architect or Engineer 225.00 Charges for contract personnel under USAquatics supervision and using USAquatics facilities will be made per the hourly rate corresponding to their classification. MEDIA Media 8.5x11 bond 11x17 bond other sizes bond foam -board photography Other and outsourced reproduction compact disk/dvd TRAVEL black & white $ 0.25/page 0.50/page 0.35/sq. ft. 4.50/sq. ft. cost cost $ 7.50 ea. color $2.00/page 4.00/page cost Mileage for personal or company vehicles used on project assignments will be $0.58 per mile (or current Federal rate). Airfare, hotel and car rental will be subject to administrative charge of 10%. All other reimbursable costs will be subject to administrative charge of 5%. PLAN REVIEW FEES The fees for plan review and approval by state, local or internal jurisdictions will be paid by the project owner for the exact amount as stipulated by the governing rules, regulations or policies. Where USAquatics is asked to pay fees on behalf of the Owner/Client, these costs shall be subject to an administrative charge of 5%. PAYMENT AND INTEREST CHARGES USAquatics shall submit progress invoices to Client showing the services performed during the invoice period and the charges for those services. Finance charges: 1.5% per month for late payments AQUATIC CONSULTING & DESIGN DATE (MM/DDNYYY) A� " CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE 06/26/2018 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). PRODUCER I CONTACT Emily Cannon NAME: Christensen Group Insurance I PHONE (952)653-1000 FAX (952)653-1100 A/C No. Ext): (A/C, No): 9855 West 78th Street, Ste 100 I E-MAIL ecannon@christensengroup.com ADDRESS: INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC # Eden Prairie MN 55344 INSURERA: Starr Surplus Lines Insurance Company 13604 INSURED INSURER B: USAQUATICS, INC. I INSURER C: 124 Bridge Ave I INSURER D: PO BOX 86 I INSURER E: Delano MN 55328 I INSURER F: COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: 18-19 PROF LIAB REVISION NUMBER: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOVV'HAVE'BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. ILTR NSD SWVD POLICY NUMBER UBIR POLICY EFF POLICY EXP LIMITS TYPE OF INSURANCE (MM/DD/YYYY) (MM/DD/YYYY) COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY = CLAIMS -MADE ❑ OCCUR GEN'LAGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: POLICY F—]PRO ❑ LOC JECT OTHER: AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY ANY AUTO OWNEDSCHEDULED _ AUTOS ONLY AUTOS HIRED NON -OWNED AUTOS ONLY AUTOS ONLY UMBRELLA LIAB OCCUR EXCESS LIAB HCLAIMS-MADE DED I I RETENTION $ WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY Y / N ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE El EXCLUDED? N /A` (Mandatory in NH) If yes, describe under DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below Professional Liability A SLSL-PRO-262407-18 EACH OCCURRENCE $ DAMAGE TO RENTED PREMISES (Ea occurrence) $ MED EXP (Any one person) $ PERSONAL & ADV INJURY $ GENERAL AGGREGATE $ PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG $ COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT $ (Ea accident) BODILY INJURY (Per person) $ BODILY INJURY (Per accident) $ PROPERTY DAMAGE $ (Per accident) $ EACH OCCURRENCE $ AGGREGATE $ PER STATUTE I EERH E.L. EACH ACCIDENT $ E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE $ E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT $ Limit $2,000,000 06/25/2018 06/25/2019 Deductible $25,000 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS / VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached if more space is required) CERTIFICATE HOLDER EVIDENCE ONLY CANCELLATION SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX I @ 1988-2015 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. ACORD 25 (2016/03) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE American Family Insurance Company ❑ American Family Mutual Insurance Company, S.I. if selection box is not checked. 6000 American Pky Madison, Wisconsin 53783.0001 Insured's Name and Address Agent's Name, Address and Phone Number (Agt./Dist.) Us Aquatics Inc Alex Roeser Agency Inc 124 Bridge Ave E 203 Bridge Ave E Ste 220 Delano, NIN 55328 Delano, MN 55328 (763) 972-2951 (269/077) This certificate is issued as a matter of information only and confers no rights upon the Certificate Holder, This certificate does not amend, extend or alter the coverage afforded by the policies listed below. COVERAGES This is to certty thatpolices of insurance listed below have been issued to the insured named above for the policy period indicated, notwithstanding any requirement, termor condition of any contractor other document with respect to which this certificate may be issued or may pertain, the insurance afforded by the policies described herein is subject to al€ the terms, exclusions, and conditions of such policies POLICY DATE I TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBEREFFECTIVE ExPlftAriaN LIMITS OF LIABILITY (Me, Day, Yr) {Mo, Day, Yr) Homeowners! Mobilehomeowners Liability Boatowners Liability Personal Umbrella Liability Farm/Ranch Liability Workers Compensation and 22-XH7196-91 Employers Liability t General Liability El Commercial General Liability (occurrence) 22-XH7196-01 Businessowners Liability Liquor Liability Automobile Liability ❑ Any Auto E] All Owned Autos ❑ Scheduled Autos 22-XH7196-03 E Hired Auto Z Nonowned Autos Ell Excess Liability ❑x Commercial Blanket Excess 22-XH7196-04 Other (Miscellaneous Coverages) Bodily Injury and Property Damage Each Occurrence Bodily Injury and Property Damage Each Occurrence Bodily Injury and Property Damage Each Occurrence Farm Liability & Personal Lidbilay Each Occurrence Farm Employer's Liability Each Occurrence Statutory 04/29/2018 04/29/2019 Each Accident Disease - Each Employee Disease - Policy Limit General Aggregate Products � Completed Operations Aggregate 04/29/2018 04/29/2019 Personal and Advertising Injury Each Occurrence Damage to Premises Rented to You Medical Expense (Any One Person) Each Occurre ncett Aggregatett Common Cause Lima Aggregate Limit Bodily Injury - Each Person Bodily Injury - Each Accident $ 04/29/2018 04/29/2019 Property Damage $ Bodily Injury and Property Damage Combined $ 04/29/2018 04/29/2019 EachoccurrencerAggregate $ 5,000,000 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS ! LOCATIONS /VEHICLES / RESTRICTIONS/ SPECIAL ITEMS CERTIFICATE HOLDER'S NAME AND ADDRESS **** Evidence Only**** tThe individual or partners ❑ Have shown as insured elected to be covered under this policy. ❑ Have not ttProducts-Completed Operations aggregate is equal to each Occurrence limit and is included In policy aggregate, CANCELLATION ❑ Should any of the above described policies be cancelled before the expiration date thereof, the company will endeavor to mail •( days) written notice to the Certificate Holder named, but failure to mad such notice shall Impose no obligation or liability of any kind upon the company, its agents or representatives '10 days unless different number of days shown U This certifies coverage on the date of issue only The above described policies are subject to cancellation in conformity with their terms and by the €aws of the state of issue. DATE ISSUED I AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE I 03/25/2019 U-201 Ed. 5100 Stock No. 06668 Rev. 7102 T TC A UUAT1(;b I . . . , a; c 3 v cc 10 r. x n 0 N. cc LO LrI (14 o� a LO z C y UJ a y 4n 10 r, C Monticello Community Center Monticello, MN Waterslide Inspection August 12, 2010 STATEMENT OF UNDERSTANDING It is our understanding that the City of Monticello wishes to have an inspection done on the existing waterslide at the Monticello Community Center indoor swimming pool. The goal is to analyze the existing waterslide, give a break -down of existing conditions, state problem areas, and suggest solutions to any of the problem areas. STUDY APPROACH The inspection approach primarily consisted of a physical assessment of the existing waterslide's fiberglass, steel and hardware equipment by Signature Aquatics with the assistance of a structural engineer. SCOPE OF STUDY The scope of this inspection covers the following areas of the facility: - Waterslide o Fiberglass o Steel structure o Hardware o Platforms o Guardrail o Surrounding areas - Some of these areas are to be reviewed by a structural engineer AREAS OF CONCERNS / ISSUES 1. There are several small cracks and chips throughout the waterslides fiberglass interior. None of the cracks throughout the interior ride path of the slide appeared to be sharp at this time. All chipping and cracking is an issue also because it may cause injuries to the riders. Slide sections will be called out by number. The numbering starts from the bottom of the slide and goes up. The Title A)J Lp 0, tics section of slide the enters in to the pool will be piece number one the next section of slide is piece number two, and so on. a. Piece number 3 has two large chips in the bottom of the slide. This chip is through the gel coat and you can see the fiberglass strands below it. This is a concern due to the fact that it can lead to water being absorbed by the fiberglass strands and rotting of the fiberglass. b. Piece number 4 has a larger gouge in it. c. Piece numbers 6 and 7 have a large gouge that spans both pieces. d. Piece number 11 has a small chip. e. Piece number 20 has a small chip in the bottom of the slide. f. Pieces 28 and 29 have chips located on the seams. 2. There are a few seams where the slide piece on the downhill side is in further than the piece uphill of it. This causes a bump in the slide. This can be a concern as it can cause the ride to be uncomfortable and can also cause minor scrapes and injuries. a. Seam 10-11 has this issue on the bottom in the middle or the riding path. b. Seam has this issue towards the top of the seam. This is not located in the ride path but it still can be a concern as someone can catch a finger or other body part on it. c. Seam 14-15 has a small portion with the downside in. d. Seam 17-18 has a little downside in of the ride path. 3. Some of the caulking is coming out of the joints. There is still caulking in between the slide pieces. The caulking near the surface can be replaced but may not be necessary unless a leak develops. Replacing this caulking at the surface may also create a smoother ride. 4. The inside surface of the slide looks like it is in generally in great condition. The gel coat looks like it has at least five more years of life in it. It may last longer is the surface is cleaned and sealed with wax. There is white material in the gel coat located in the wide path of the slide. This is most likely deposits from hard water and either sodium or calcium. Sometimes this can be removed by buffing out the slide with a high speed buffer and some light cutting compound. 5. The outside of the slide looks like it is still in good shape. The outside of the slide can dry out and begin to deteriorate. Cleaning and sealing the outside surface will extend its life greatly. 6. There is a problem with the last left hand turn on the slide. There have been reports of minor injuries from riders. I noticed this when I rode the slide. It seems that this is caused by the long straight run before the turn. The run is long and has a lot of fall. This causes riders to enter the turn too fast. The facility has taken steps to prevent this such as having riders ride the slide in the sitting position. This is in contradiction to what the slide manufactures recommends but it has been preventing further problems. It is possible that another turn and more length could be added to the. slide to eliminate any further problems. 7. The top starting platform is made of poured concrete. Water appears to sit next the guard rail on either side of the starting tub. This is causing the steel around the platform to rust and deteriorate. Page 2 of 4 wnxtore- Title There is also a piece broken on the aluminum stair located at the top of the stairs. I would suggest that the ceramic tile be removed from the top platform. More slope should then be added to help remove the water at fast rate. The broken top step should then be removed and filled with non - shrink grout. Quartz epoxy flooring should then be installed to include all/a" radius coping and base that goes up around the bottom of the guard rail and walls. This will seal the floor and prevent future corrosion. Any corrosion on the guard rail and other steel parts should be removed and repainted before the flooring is completed. 8. There have been reports with people slipping on the concrete stairs. Quartz epoxy flooring can be installed on the treads to add a durable non-skid finish. 9. Added supports on the top of the stair stringer. 10. Added supports on the bottom of the stair stringer. To include removing corrosion on the hand rail mounts. Estimated pricing 1. Fixing the chips and gouges - $2,200 2. Fixing miss aligned seams - $1,700 3. Re -caulking slide seams - $3,500 4. Re -coating slide for future budgeting - $30,000 5. Installing more turns and length — This would require contacting the original slide manufacture as the slide would need to be re -designed. 6. Instal ' flooring - $7,500 _Includes prepping and re -sloping the floor 7. Installing stair tread material - $10 per sqft 8. Install added supports on the top steel stair stringer to include pouring in the top stringer - $3,500 Summary The waterslide is still in good condition. It is recommended the above issues are taken care of in a timely manner. Preventative maintenance is always a good way to extend the life of the waterslide. Page 3 of 4 rWuU atic-5 Page 4 of 4 Title CITYOF Monticdo REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SECTION I: GENERAL INFORMATION Contract Administration All persons or firms whom download this RFP are requested to register their name and email address by sending an email to ann.mosackaci.monticello.mn.us. Any revisions or corrections to this RFP, after it has been advertised, will be communicated to those registered RFP holders. Failure to register your contact information is at your own risk. A proposal will not be considered if it fails to include all requested information as detailed in this original RFP and any subsequent modifications. Acceptance of Proposal Contents The contents of this RFP will be included as part of the contractual obligations if a contract ensues. All information in the proposal is subject to disclosure under the provisions of Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13 — Minnesota Government Data Practices Act. PROJECT OVERVIEW The City of Monticello is seeking construction management for our waterslide replacement project at the Monticello Community Center indoor pool area: 505 Walnut Street, Monticello, MN. The existing waterslide was installed in 1999 and concerns have been expressed in recent vessel inspections prompting the City's desire to replace the slide vessel_ The City intends to retain a professional consulting firm to provide professional services needed to successfully implement the design and construction of the 2019 Monticello Community Center Waterslide Replacement. Construction is expected to begin September 2, 2019 and achieve completion by November 1, 2019. Funding for the project is available in the community center budget. The improvements to be undertaken with this project are shown in the attached figure and include the following: • Confirm the structural integrity of the existing waterslide support structure, platform and stairs. If possible, the city would like to re -use the existing support structure. • Demolish and remove existing water slide. • Install new waterslide. • Connections to existing pool water supply and return. • Restoration of the pool vessel, pool deck around waterslide, waterslide support structure and stairs. Request for Proposals Monticello Community Center - Waterslide Replacement Page 2 of 6 -------------------------- Our Capital Improvement Plan estimate for total investment of this project (design, construction, testing, etc.) is approximately $150,000. SECTION 2: OVERALL SCOPE OF SERVICES The services required of the Consultant are anticipated to be provided beginning in May 2019 and ending when the warranty inspection for the constructed improvements has been completed. The following are general work tasks and deliverables that shall be included in the Consultant's scope: 1. Site evaluation and the evaluation of existing structure 2. Pre -design kickoff meeting with city 3. 60% plans and cost estimate for city review. 4. 90% plans, specifications, and cost estimate for city review and for approval from the City Council. 5. Final bid documents. 6. Contract bidding and award procedures. 7. Acquire city building permit and other permits required for the project. 8. Construction management services. 9. Warranty inspection The City will provide the original construction plans for the waterslide. All permit and other regulatory review fees shall be paid by the consultant and will be reimbursed by the City. These costs shall not be included in the consultants not to exceed fee for the project. SECTION 3: PROPOSALS The proposal shall contain the type of information summarized below. Additional information is allowable as long as it is directly relevant to the proposed project. Proposal Format The submittal should follow the Table of Contents listed below: 1. General Information 2. Project Understanding 3. Project Approach 4. Proposed Project Team and Experience 5. Schedule 6. Any Additional Information as Needed 7. Total Consultant Cost 8. Insurance Certificate A brief description of each section is included below. Request for Proposals Monticello Community Center - Waterslide Replacement Page 3 of 6 -------------------------- 1. General Information General information and a brief history of the Consultant's firm. Include similar information on key subconsultants, if any, proposed for the project. 2. Project Understanding A summary of the Consultant's understanding of the work. 3. Project Approach Provide specific approaches, methods, and assumptions that will be utilized to accomplish the development of this project, including each work phase. Include details about the Consultant's approach to coordinating a public process. 4. Proposed Project Team and Experience ■ Identify the key project team members and describe their specific roles on the project. Include key team members from sub -consultant firms if any. ■ Describe relevant experience and provide information on at least three (3) reference projects completed in the last five (5) years. Provide personal references and contact information. ■ Include one-page resumes only for key members of the project team, including field personnel. ■ Include specific descriptions of proposed team members' roles on reference projects. Provide a contact name and information for each of the work items. 5. Schedule A proposed schedule from project initiation to final completion of construction. The schedule should include a listing of key tasks within each phase, key milestones and approximate dates, and deliverables. 6. Additional Information Include any other information that is believed to be pertinent, but not specifically requested elsewhere in this RFP. 7. Total Consultant Cost The consultant cost should be broken out as follows: a. Proposed costs for each scope of work for the project as listed in Section 2. b. Hourly rates for all consultant employees who are expected to work on this project. These rates shall be the agreed upon costs for any additional services requested by the City, above what is detailed in the scope of this RFP. c. Reimbursable costs including detail of service or item and applicable charge per unit. d. Not to Exceed cost for the project. 8. Insurance Certificate Request for Proposals Monticello Community Center - Waterslide Replacement Page 4 of 6 -------------------------- Indicate ability to provide all necessary insurance certificates. SECTION 4: CONSULTANT SELECTION Proposals will be reviewed and evaluated by a team of City staff on the basis of the following criteria: 1. Consulting firm and key project staff experience with similar projects to this. In addition to understanding technical issues and having sound technical/ engineering expertise, the Consultant must also have an awareness and understanding of the social/political issues that can surround projects of this nature, and must possess the personal and leadership skills necessary to navigate the project through the public process. 2. Proven successful construction management of projects of this nature is required. This includes the effective coordination and management of private and public utilities, contractors, adjacent property owners, and other stakeholders. 3. Proven track record in successfully completing similar projects on time and within budget. Successful experience of both the firm itself and the individual team members will be considered. 4. Proposed approach to completing the project 5. Proposed consultant cost Following review of the Proposals the City may ask Consultants to make a presentation to City representatives, staff will select a Consultant to negotiate a contract as follows: 1. If, for any reason, a firm is not able to commence the services in that firm's Proposal within 30 days of the award, the City reserves the right to contract with another qualified firm. 2. The City shall not be liable for any expenses incurred by the Consultant prior to the signing of a contract including, but not limited to, the Proposal preparation, attendance at interviews, or final contract negotiations. 3. The Proposal must be signed in ink by an official authorized to bind the Consultant to its provisions that will be included as part of an eventual contract. The Proposal must include a statement as to the period during which the Proposal remains valid. This period must be at least 90 days from the date of the submittal. 4. The City reserves the right to reject any and all Proposals submittals or to request additional information from any or all of the proposing firms. SECTION 5: CONTRACT TERMS AND CONDITIONS Upon selection of a Consultant, an Agreement or Contract for Services, attached to this RFP, shall be entered into by the City and the Consultant. It is expected that the contract will provide for compensation for actual work completed on a not to exceed basis, and the following conditions: Request for Proposals Monticello Community Center - Waterslide Replacement -------------------------- Page 5 of 6 1. Deletions of specific itemized work tasks will be at the discretion of the City. Payment or reimbursement shall be made based on tasks that have been satisfactorily completed. Billing that exceed the not to exceed amount will not be compensated unless a contract extension has been approved in advance by the City. 2. The City shall retain ownership of all documents, plans, maps, reports and data prepared under this proposal. In addition to being provided hard copy and digital documents throughout the project, upon completion the consultant shall supply the City with a fully scanned (Laserfiche) project file. 3. If, for any reason, the Consultant is unable to fulfill the obligations under the contract in a timely and proper manner, the City shall reserve the right to terminate the contract by written notice. In this event, the firm shall be entitled to just and equitable compensation for any satisfactory completed work tasks, as determined by the City Project Manager. 4. The Consultant shall not assign or transfer any interest in the contract without prior written consent of the City. 5. The Consultant shall maintain comprehensive general liability insurance in accordance with Section 466.04 of the Minnesota Statutes. The Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of Monticello, its officials, employees and agents, from any and all claims, causes of action, lawsuits, damages, losses or expenses, including attorney fees, arising out of or resulting from the Consultant's (including its officials, agents, subconsultants or employees) performance of the duties required under the contract, provided that any such claim, damages, loss or expense is attributable to bodily injury, sickness, diseases or death or injury to or destruction of property including the loss of use resulting therefrom and is caused in whole or in part by any negligent act or omission or willful misconduct of Consultant. The Consultant contract shall be governed by the laws of the State of Minnesota. Project summaries shall be submitted with each invoice during the course of the project. Each summary shall detail the amount billed to date, work items that need to be completed, the estimated costs to complete these tasks and the projected timeline for the completion of the project. Invoices submitted to the City shall include a detailed breakdown of times, personnel, mileage, etc. chargeable for that period. SECTION 6: CONCLUSION AND SUBMITTAL Any requests for additional information that may be needed for the preparation of the proposal should be directed via email to Ann Mosack at ann.mosack(aci.monticello.mn.us. All questions must be received before 4:30 pm, May 9, 2019. No responses will be provided for questions received after that time. Please provide 3 paper and one electronic (pd� copies of the Proposal for the evaluation process. Request for Proposals Monticello Community Center - Waterslide Replacement -------------------------- Proposals shall be addressed to: Ann Mosack. Community Center Director City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street Monticello MN 55362 Proposals will be accepted until 11:30 a.m. on May 16, 2019 Attachments: Waterslide pictures Inspection report Page 6 of 6 AV'.e- At 4 N% N --7-,777' NN 7 7 ITT -7 % Ok% P� TO LA ------------- City Council Agenda: 05/28/2019 2S. Consideration of approving purchase of epoxy floor for the new fire station apparatus bav from SwedeBro in the amount of $ 77,950 (DK) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: City Council is asked to accept the quote from SwedeBro for the purchase of an epoxy floor system for the apparatus bay of the new fire station. This purchase was not in the budget for the new station approved by council. This flooring system is designed to be non -slip, fluid resistant and flex with the concrete as it settles in the new station apparatus bay. We are asking council to approve this upgrade to the concrete flooring in the new station as an added safety measure. Slips, trips and falls are one of the biggest causes of injuries in the fire service. Concrete flooring is known for being slippery when wet and stains easily if motor oils or other fluid come in contact with it. This epoxy flooring will have grit incorporated into it to make it much less slippery and will be fluid resistant. The epoxy floor will also be striped for parking guidance within it versus concrete which would have to be re -striped every year or so. This flooring would also keep the public safer at our open houses and other public events. Vendors and other visitors to the station would also benefit from the safer flooring. There is no state bid for this item. SwedeBro has already won the subcontract bid for the rest of the flooring in the new fire station. We do not want to engage multiple sub- contractors for the flooring. Due to warranty, maintenance and other issues, we are asking that the apparatus bay flooring be added as a separate contract with SwedeBro as a sole source project. Swede Bro is a member of the Cooperative Purchasing Connection that the city is a member of. Numerous efforts through our general contractor and architect were made to find other vendors. Staff was unsuccessful in finding a vendor to do a floor of this size. Al. Budget Impact: This item was not included in 2019 new fire station construction budget. However, with cost savings already recognized in other items, this will not increase the total budget of the project. Including the cost of the epoxy floor ($77,000) and the AV system ($99,000), along with credits for the 5% contingency ($205,000) and sales tax reimbursement ($180,000) we are approximately $405,000 under the $5.6 M bonding limit. With the potential approval of this purchase and the epoxy floor you will have approved the last two large cost items. In conversations with the general contractor and architect the only item that could in any way significantly impact the $405,000 surplus would be something major in regards to the foundation. Recent and initial soil borings and test show no issues with the soil. We all agree that at this time needing any significant amount of the surplus is very unlikely. Please note that the omnibus tax bill has not been signed as of the time of preparation of this report so the $180,000 remains speculative until the bill is signed into law. A2. Staff Workload Impact: The flooring system will greatly reduce the probability of slips, trips and falls in the bay. City Council Agenda: 05/28/2019 B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve purchase of the flooring system for $77,950 2. Motion to deny purchase of the flooring system for $77,950 C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends Alternative #1. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • Quote from SwedeBro \ 4 . "'. I I �� 1409 159t" Ave. NE • Ham Lake, MN 55304 Office: 763-434-9237 www.swedebro.com Fax: 763-434-8999 Customer: City of Monticello Date: 3/12/19 PO Box 422 Monticello, MN 55362 RE: Monticello Fire Station Description: Apparatus Bav Floorina - Mechanically steel shot -blast and/or diamond grind concrete to profile and prepare. - Apply 4 inch high integral troweled epoxy mortar cove base. - Apply Sherwin-Williams Epo-Flex Ceramic Carpet system in a color blend TBD. - Add safety yellow integral striping. Sub -Total: $77,950.00 Floor must be swept clean from debris prior to our arrival. Everything must be off the floor prior to our arrival. Owner to provide dumpster use mainly for empty 5 gallon pails. Project is bid to be completed all at once and requires exclusive access. Project will take 6-7 working days to complete (we do not work on Sundays) Additional phases will reauire additional mobilization charaes. Options 1. Add Office Rooms in a standard Ceramic Carpet System. Add: $21,110.00 OR 2. Add Office Rooms in Epo-Flex Ceramic Carpet System. Add: $38,000.00 (NO intearal cove base in offices) Cement, acid, and stain colors cannot be precise; therefore finished color and texture will vary from I Total Price $ any color charts or samples shown. All existing expansion joints may be re -cut; cracks in base (Deposit for Materials Required NO substrata may reoccur. Bids and prices are valid for 60 days I BALANCE DUE $ Contract subject to terms/conditions listed. Unpaid balances after 60 days of completion may be sent to collections. Unpaid balances are assessed a 1.5% (18% APR) finance charge per month after 30 days. A mechanic's lien may be filed on any unpaid balances after 60 days. Buyer's Signature Date THIS CONTRACT SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS LISTED BELOW 1. The terms set forth in this agreement are intended as the complete and exclusive statement of the contract and may not be contradicted by evidence of any prior agreement or of a contemporaneous oral agreement. Only a memorandum signed by both parties and their authorized agent may amend this contract. Any changes to this contract may subject Buyer to additional charges. 2. Seller will complete work as expediently as possible once started and begin work within terms agreed to. Seller is not responsible for delays beyond his control. 3. This agreement is the actual order of the items listed above and it is understood that all items are custom made and all work is custom. Deposit is non-refundable. In case of sale of home or business, contract may be terminated upon payment to Seller of a sum equal to one third of the remaining balance. 4. Buyer agrees to and has read the Chemical Stain Disclaimer form (if necessary), and Expectation form. 5. Balance of money is due upon completion of work. If claim for payment is placed in the hands of an attorney for collection, Buyer agrees to pay Seller a reasonable attorney's fee fixed by the court. 6. Except as provided in writing, Seller does not warrant the goods covered by this agreement and no other warranty expressed or implied is made by Seller. Seller is also not responsible for slip resistance chosen by the Buyer. If Buyer desires to change slip resistance, additional charges will apply. 7. Warranty is void with regard to any part or parts subject to abuse, neglect, or accidental causes including but not limited to: fire, flood, acts of God, and war. 8. Seller is not responsible for sub -surfaces such as concrete during the installation due to the fact the prior conditions of the surfaces cannot be determined. Any problems that occur due to these sub -surfaces can not be warranted. This includes moisture transmission and hydrostatic pressure in concrete. Any defects in sub -surface will not be addressed unless listed above. 9. Seller will make every reasonable effort, in advance, to protect landscaping, walls and all adjacent areas and items from damage; however, Seller cannot warranty these areas against possible damage. It is the responsibility of the Buyer to protect these areas. Pools must be drained during installation. 10. Seller will not assume responsibility of damage caused by non -recommended maintenance procedures. It is agreed that Seller shall not be liable for any defect or damage resulting from installations requested by Buyer that depart from accepted installation methods. If an unauthorized person services the surface, any warranty is automatically voided and Seller assumes no liability or responsibility for damage. 11. In cases where buyer does not own the home or business to which Seller is installing surface, buyer represents that he has permission of owner to install surface and is fully responsible for completion of contract. Condominium owners, homeowners, and business owners responsible to associations or boards represent that they have or will obtain any necessary approvals. 12. Buyer grants Seller permission to photograph the installation and installation site and use such photographs in future sales presentations and advertising. 13. During the project, Seller may substitute better quality and/or more expensive products and/or processes with or without the verbal or written approval of the Buyer. 14. Buyer must notify Seller a minimum of 48 hours (not including weekends) prior to the scheduled start day of any delays or postponement. If Seller is not notified at least 48 hours in advance, additional charges will be added. 15. Any person or company supplying labor or materials for this improvement to your property may file a lien against your property if that person or company is not paid for the contributions. Under Minnesota law, you have the right to pay persons who supplied labor or materials for this improvement directly and deduct this amount from our contract price, or withhold the amounts due them from us until 120 days after completion of the improvement unless we give you a lien waiver signed by persons who supplied any labor or material for the improvement and who gave you timely notice. City Council Agenda: 05/28/2019 2T. Consideration of auurovinu uurchase of the securitv system for the new fire station from Russell Securitv in the amount of $ 42,153 (DK) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: City Council is asked to accept a quote from Russell Security for the purchase of the security system for the new fire station via the state contract. This purchase was in the budget for the new station approved by council. Two additional quotes separate from the state contract were also obtained, however, the best price is off the state contract. • Russell Security - $42,153 • All State Security - $44,927 • AFC Technologies - $92,462 This system includes all the locks, camera system and the card access system. This item was bid off of the state contract. The selected bid came nearly $4000 under budget estimate for the item. Al. Budget Impact: This item is included in 2019 new fire station construction budget. A2. Staff Workload Impact: This security system will keep our new station and EOC secure. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve purchase of the security system in the amount of $42,153. 2. Motion to deny purchase of the security system in the amount of $42,153. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends Alternative #1. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Quote from Russel Security B. Quote from All State Security C. Quote from AFC Technologies 1 Qty Fire Department 20 Door Card Access Due on receipt JAG Description 5 KERI NXT 4 Door Access Control Panel 20:: KERI Proximity Card Reader 3::12/24 Volt - 5 Amp Power Supply 3 Power Distribution Board 1-8 Fused 2 ::Power Distribution Board 1-4 fused 4::12V, 8Amp/Hr Battery 1 Low Voltage Wire, boxes and rough -in for readers 160': Labor, Installation, Training 110 volt supplied by others € Electric door strikes and door sensors installed and provided by hardware supplier 100 € PROX KEY FOBS- NXT 4 indoor and 6 outdoor 4MP IP camera system with a 16TB 16 channel POE network recorder 4: 4MP IP Camera- H.265 IR Flat Dome, 30FPS POE 6::4 MP Eyeball Camera, 2.8mm, Outdoor POE 10:: Wall Mount for ETL Series & EHN Series (fixed) and KHN Series Cameras 1 E H.265 16 Channel NVR with built in POE Plug 2': Seagate 8TB Hard Drive 1 Low Voltage Wire Cat 6 Plenum 44 Labor, Installation, Light Repairs, Adjustments and Training Note: No license fees or annual fees needed i 2.8mm WDR 4MP Dome Camera ............................................................................................................................................................................................ Phone # 763-682-1253 Fax # 763-682-0139 Page 1 Subtotal Sales Tax (0.0%) Total Estimate Russell Security Resource Inc - Date Estimate # 205 5th St NE #6 L�CI(5un■imrted 5/13/2019 3569 r1� Q �i■ R 5n►utian5 Buffalo. MN 55313 Name / Address CITY OF MONTICELLO 505 WALNUT STREET MONTICELLO, MN 55362 Fire Dept P.O. No. Terms Rep Project Qty Fire Department 20 Door Card Access Due on receipt JAG Description 5 KERI NXT 4 Door Access Control Panel 20:: KERI Proximity Card Reader 3::12/24 Volt - 5 Amp Power Supply 3 Power Distribution Board 1-8 Fused 2 ::Power Distribution Board 1-4 fused 4::12V, 8Amp/Hr Battery 1 Low Voltage Wire, boxes and rough -in for readers 160': Labor, Installation, Training 110 volt supplied by others € Electric door strikes and door sensors installed and provided by hardware supplier 100 € PROX KEY FOBS- NXT 4 indoor and 6 outdoor 4MP IP camera system with a 16TB 16 channel POE network recorder 4: 4MP IP Camera- H.265 IR Flat Dome, 30FPS POE 6::4 MP Eyeball Camera, 2.8mm, Outdoor POE 10:: Wall Mount for ETL Series & EHN Series (fixed) and KHN Series Cameras 1 E H.265 16 Channel NVR with built in POE Plug 2': Seagate 8TB Hard Drive 1 Low Voltage Wire Cat 6 Plenum 44 Labor, Installation, Light Repairs, Adjustments and Training Note: No license fees or annual fees needed i 2.8mm WDR 4MP Dome Camera ............................................................................................................................................................................................ Phone # 763-682-1253 Fax # 763-682-0139 Page 1 Subtotal Sales Tax (0.0%) Total L�Cr1l�(5Un►imrted Q �i■ R 5n►utian5 Name / Address CITY OF MONTICELLO 505 WALNUT STREET MONTICELLO, MN 55362 Fire Dept Russell Security Resource Inc 205 5th St NE #6 Buffalo, MN 55313 P.O. No. Terms Due on receipt ........................................................................................................................................................................................... Qty Description E 2 Door 2 Room IP Video Intercom System 217" IP Indoor Video Intercom Station 2 Hikvision Video Door Station 1 E 24VDC Power & Data Distributor 2 Desk Monitor Stand 1 E Low Voltage Wire Cat 6 and 18-2 Plenum 14:: Labor, Installation, Light Repairs, Adjustments & Lubrication Included Note: The video from the video intercom will be recorded on the video recorder. ............................................................................................................................................................................ Russell Security Resource, Inc. guaranties all materials to be of good quality and to be installed in a professional manner. Russell Security Resource, Inc. prides itself on following a high code of ethics and will not compromise this high standard. All warranties will follow the manufacturers warranty unless otherwise stated. All prices are guaranteed for 30 days, no additional charges will be added without prior approval. Phone # 763-682-1253 Fax # 763-682-0139 Page 2 Subtotal Estimate Date Estimate # 5/13/2019 3569 Rep Project JAG Sales Tax (0.0%) Total $42,152.22 $0.00 $42,152.22 ALL STATE COMMUNICATIONS May 23rd, 2019 City of Monticello - Fire Department 505 Walnut Street Monticello, MN 55362 Attention: Dan Klein. Fire Marshall Listed below is the scope for the Access Control System and the Camera/Intercom System: Scope: Access Control System All State Communications (ASC) to provide a web -based access control platform that includes a server appliance supporting up to 32 reader capacity. The system includes 19 iClass 37bit card readers and 1 iClass 37bit card reader with keypad for code control at the entrance bay location. The enclosures and power supplies are included to support the readers and locking hardware provided by others. Electrical, conduit, door hardware and door hardware installation by others. Rack space and network PoE+ switches are by owner. Owner to provide ample wall space for access control panel mounting and plywood backing by others. 100 iClass keyfobs included. Integration to camera system and intercom door release included. Access control system to be managed at 2 workstation areas and will allow door release from workstations and mobile devices. Part # Description Quantity Software and Server Appliance AC -APP -32R -PRO Access Control Manager Pro -Web Based Appliance 1.00 AC-SW-MER-RDR up to 32 readers only -no expansion 1.00 Controllers and Sub Panels AC-MER-CONT-LP1502 Intelligent IP Controller - 2 RD-8in-4out 1.00 AC-MER-CON-MR52 Series 3 - 2 Reader Interface module - 2 RD-Bin-4out 9.00 Power Supply and Enclosure AC -LSP -wired -FPO -150 8 Door Enclosure w PS boards-Panel/Reader/Hardware 3.00 Card Readers 5114 Marson Drive Sauk Rapids, MN 56379 320.203.1511 Phone 320.203.1510 Fax 2611 Hamline Avenue North Roseville, MN 55113 651.636.7200 Phone 651.636.7201 Fax www.allstatecom.com 5602 36th Street South Fargo, ND 58104 701.373.1001 Phone 701.373.0199 Fax ALL STATE COMMUNICATIONS An Arvig• Company AC-HID-READ-ICLASS-SE-RP40- AVG RP -40 HID Multiclass reader 19.00 AC-HID-READ-(CLASS-SE-RPk40- AVG RPK-40 HID Multiclass reader and keypad 1.00 HD-NVRWS3-8TB-NA Locking Hardware connections- Door hardware by owner 20.00 4C-ACC6-STD Standard Licenses for 4 cameras -unlimited clients 2.00 1C-ACC6-STD HID Ke fobs 1.00 AC-HID-FOB-Iclass-32 50 PN NMN- av HID Klass SE Keyfob 2K/2 HID Logo Blue 100.00 M2324 -NA Video Monitor -24" LCD 16:9 - 2.3 me a ixel 2.00 Misc. mounting hardware 1.00 Scone: All State Communications (ASC) to provide an Avigilon VMS Dell workstation server with 8T13 of storage with over 30 days of storage for video. The camera platform is a web based access control platform that includes 2- 3.OMP indoor domes, 3-3.OMP exterior Bullet cameras, 1 multi -head 180 degree 9MP camera1-6.OMP 360 degree camera and 2 Vestibule 3.OMP camera/intercom combination devices. There are 2 additional workstations with 1 monitor each provided that will incorporate the access control system, video system and the intercom system on the security workstations. The intercom system is not SIP compliant but will have two- way communication through the workstations. Current version of Mobile has intercom push with 1 way down communication only. If a two-way SIP intercom system is required internally, an additional $1,500.00 will need to be added to the cost of the system. Part # Description Quantity Video Server and Software -9 licenses total HD-NVRWS3-8TB-NA Avigilon BTB Dell Desktop Server 1.00 4C-ACC6-STD Standard Licenses for 4 cameras -unlimited clients 2.00 1C-ACC6-STD Standard Licenses for 1 camera -unlimited clients 1.00 HD-RMWS3-2MN-NA Avi 'Ion Hiah Performance Remote Monitoring WKS 2.00 M2324 -NA Video Monitor -24" LCD 16:9 - 2.3 me a ixel 2.00 Camera -Intercom 3.OL-H4SL-D1 3.0 MP Light Catcher 3-9mm indoor dome 2.00 3.00-H4SL-BOl-IR 3.0 MP 3-9mm indoor outdoor IR Bullet 3.00 9C-H4A-3MH-180 3X3MP 180 degree WDR 4.OMM lens multi -head camera 1.00 6.0-H4F-1)01-IR 6.OMP Fisheye Camera1.45 mm Integrated IR 1.00 POE-INJ2-60W-NA Exterior Camera PoE+ 60 W Injectors 1.00 H4AMH-AD-PEND1 Outdoor Pendant Mount adapter for Exterior Cameras 1.00 H4AMH-DO-COVR1 Outdoor Dome Cover 1.00 5114 Marson Drive Sauk Rapids, MN 56379 320.203.1511 Phone 320.203.1510 Fax 2611 Hamline Avenue North Roseville, MN 55113 651.636.7200 Phone 651.636.7201 Fax www.allstatecom.com 5602 36th Street South Fargo, ND 58104 701.373.1001 Phone 701.373.0199 Fax ALL STATE COMMUNICATIONS An A"* Company IRPTZ-MNT-W/kl l H4-BQ-18��1 Outdoor Pendant - Wall MountbAlp;ers Junction box for the H4A Bullet Cameras H4 3.OMP Vf deo Intercoms -Vestibules J14 Intercom adapter 'Pprcopl,&gee adapterreljy Misc hardware Total Access Control System — Hardware and Labor $25,202.00 Total Camera and Intercom System — Hardware and Labor $19,725.00 Tax Exempt: No Tax is Included in this proposal Total System Cost— Hardware and Labor $44,927.00 Warranty Information: All State Communications provides a one-year parts & labor warranty for equipment that is installed by All State Communications. Any equipment we do not install is not covered under our warrantee but is covered under the Manufacturer's warranty. All warranty repairs shall be made during normal business hours. (Monday— Friday, 8:00 AM — 5:00 PM). Exclusions include; misuse, under/over voltage, water damage or Acts of God, such as lightning. Exceptions / Clarifications 1.00 3,90 2.00 299 1 1.00 This quotation does not include any electrical or PoE+ network switches, UPS backup, racks for mounting the equipment in the data closet, any networking or data jacks for workstations in the offices are provided by owner. ASC to provide 2 viewing workstations, 2 monitors for systems. Intercom stations have 1 way down audio only on mobile application. Additional $1,500.00 cost if SIP compliant intercom system is required. Sales taxes are exempt. PROPOSED BY: ALL STATE COMMUNICATIONS By: Name: Jim Andrews Title: Senior Account Manaeer Date: May 23rd, 2019 ACCEPTED BY: City of Monticello Fire Department By: _Dan Klein X: Title: Fire Marshall Date: PO#: 5114 Marson Drive 2611 Hamline Avenue North 5602 361' Street South Sauk Rapids, MN 56379 Roseville, MN 55113 Fargo, ND 58104 320.203.1511 Phone 651.636.7200 Phone 701.373.1001 Phone 320.203.1510 Fax 651.636.7201 Fax 701.373.0199 Fax www.allstatecom.com 6740 Hwy 10 NW Suite 109 Ramsey, MN 55303 (763) 427 -Tech (8324) TA of �C, LLC. CARD A CCESSICCTVIINTER COM PROPOSAL Attn: Dan Klein Date: May 21, 2019 Monticello Fire Department Contact: Bill Karels Fax. 763.427.8326 PROJECT NAME: Card Access, CCTV and Video Intercom SCOPE OF WORK AFC Technologies will provide and install Sielox Anyware access control, Vicon CCTV and Aiphone video intercom systems.. Cabling to all doors. Mullion Proximity card reader, door contact, request to exit motion detector and electric strike locks. 100 Proximity access cards. Video Intercom on main door. Part # Description Quantitv AC AW Sielox access anywhere server 1 AC-AW8-DT-75E2-20D Twenty Door Access Controller Package 1 AC -181 MP Mullion Proximity Card Reader 20 Trex-LT Request to Exit Motion Detector 20 1078 Door Contact 20 ES -1 Electric Strike 20 Coml Composite Cable 4000' AC -15C -E Proximity Access Cards 100 IX -IV Aip[hone IP video intercom unit 1 V9360 360 Degree Dome Camera 6 V804 Fixed Dome Camera 3 Valerus Pro Vicon Video Management with 6tb storage 1 Misc Connectors 1 PRICING Total Cost will be: $92,462.00 EXCEPTIONS & TERMS Computer for the software. 120vac power. City Council Agenda: 05/28/2019 2U. Consideration of auurovinu uurchase of audio-visual uackne for the new fire station from Tiernev Brothers in the amount of $ 99,200 (DK) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: City Council is asked to accept the quote from Tierney Brothers for the purchase of the audio-visual package for the new fire station. This purchase is an addition to the budget for the new station approved by council. This package includes all the audio and visual equipment for the entire station. It includes the integration with our radio system, all of the equipment for the EOC and offices. Originally, due to budget constraints, it was the intention to develop the AV package over time. However, given the favorable bid, it is recommended that we utilize available bonding capacity to complete the AV system at the front end of the project. The purchase from Tierney Brothers includes both equipment and installation. An effort was made locally, through the architect and general contractor to find additional vendors. Due to not wanting to incur travel and lodging expenses, in state vendors only were researched. We were unable to find one that would do a project of this size. This amount was included as a budget estimate in the station budget and came in exactly as estimated. We feel strongly that this equipment should be installed during initial construction and not at a later date. We estimate a 20-40% price increase if we try to install it after construction. Al. Budget Impact: This item is an addition to new fire station construction budget. Looking at the overall budget for the new fire station including the $205,000 contingency and the project $180,000 sales tax reimbursement, we are approximately $405,000 under approved budget at this time. We have seen significant cost savings on numerous items. With the approval of this purchase and the epoxy floor you will have approved the last two large cost items. In conversations with the general contractor and architect the only item that could in anyway significantly impact the $405,000 surplus would be something major in regards to the foundation. Recent and initial soil borings and test show no issues with the soil. We all agree that at this time needing any significant amount of the surplus is very unlikely. A2. Staff Workload Impact: This technology is essential with the demands for technology use in both the fire service and emergency management communities. This purchase would give us a state-of-the-art station and Emergency Operations Center. This EOC and station could be used not only locally but regionally as it will be one of a kind at the city level. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve purchase of the audio-visual package in the amount of $99,200 through the state contract. 2. Motion to table or deny purchase of the audio-visual package in the amount of $99,200. Staff has made a strong effort to find other companies that are qualified to quote on this project but have come up empty therefore the state contract via City Council Agenda: 05/28/2019 Tierney Brothers appears to be the only alternative. However, Council could direct staff to keep trying. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends Alternative #1. Based on information from the architect and others, it is our view that we have exhausted possible alternatives for obtaining additional quotes. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • Quote from Tierney Brothers. #TIERNEY 1771 Energy Park Dr. #100, St. Paul, MN 55108 800.933.7337 11 nfo@tlerneybros.com Wednesday, May 22, 2019 City Of Monticello Proposal for Audio -Visual Service RE: New Fire Station Opportunity Number: 20776 R1 Scope of Integration Services Summary of Work to be completed by Tierney Brothers, Inc. at 505 Walnut Street, Monticello, MN 55362. (Please initial if address is correct or provide correct address. ) Tierney Brothers Incorporated (TBI) is proposing AV systems at a new fire station for the City of Monticello. These will include: A -Quote #153894 - Room 141 EOC / Trainina Room Video Eauioment TBI will supply and wall mount as the main display an LG 86" 4K LED display. Four (4) additional LG 55" 4K LED displays will be supplied and wall mounted. Each display will have an OFE Chief PAC storage box mounted in the wall behind the display provided and installed by clients electrician. Sources will include four local laptop HDMI connections, one (1) dedicated OFE (Owner Furnished Equipment) PC's with HDMI connectivity, and one (1) Blu- ray player. Each source is fully matrixed via Crestron DigitalMedia NVX network encoders / decoders and can be shown on the main display or any of the four (4) 55" displays. The OFE PC's, the cable TV source device and the Blu-ray player will be housed in a TBI provided wall mounted 26 space equipment rack located in storage room 143. The PC will be controlled using USB over CAT 5 extenders for OFE keyboard and mouse functionality. Audio Eauioment TBI will supply, rack mount and configure a Biamp TesiraForte Dante digital signal processor (DSP). A Shure wireless receiver will be mounted in the equipment rack and a handheld / lavaliere style wireless microphone receivers will be provided. Note that one or the other transmitters can be used at a time. All source program audio that is shown on the main display will be routed through the DSP and can be played back through eight (8) Crestron Saros ceiling speakers. A Crestron 20OW 70 volt amplifier will be supplied and mounted in the equipment rack. Local source audio sent to each 55" display via a laptop will be heard through the internal speakers. #TIERNEY 1771 Energy Park Dr. #100, St. Paul, MN 55108 800.933.7337 11 nfo@tlerneybros.com Note that future VoIP, Analog or Web conferencing capabilities are available. Control System TBI will supply and program a Crestron 10" wall mounted touch panel with the following functionality: • Display input selection- each of the displays will be able to display a unique input as the system is fully matrixed. The programmer will create a graphical layout of the room for the owner to easily select the display and then the input to that display. • Audio level control with graphical feedback. Note that any audio source can be sent to the overhead speakers. When an individual laptop is plugged in and selected at one of the four displays audio will be preset and sent to that displays speakers. • Individual microphone level control and muting, overall muting, and overall level • System Power o Individual control of each display o Overall system all on • Source device control o Blu-ray — Play, Pause, Stop, FFWD, REW, SFWD, SREV, REC An OFE IPad will be programmed to mirror the 10" controller Note that any channel changes required with the OFE cable TV source device will be done using the OFE remote control that comes with the devise. Controlled Devices • LED Displays: LAN via NVX Encoder / Decoder • Touch Screen: via POE Ethernet • Audio Processor: via LAN • Control Processor: LAN • Source Switching NVX via LAN • Blu-ray: via LAN Client Responsibilities • Provide electrician to install display back boxes and 110V AC service for four (4) outlets • Provide wall space for 24 space wall equipment rack in storage room next to EOC • Provide 3/4" plywood backing for 86"display and wall rack • Provide 110V duplex outlet at equipment rack location • Provide conduit or plenum wire pathways as required • Provide network connectivity at equipment rack and wireless network for OFE IPad • Provide cable TV source device and cable service #TIERNEY 1771 Energy Park Dr. #100, St. Paul, MN 55108 800.933.7337 11 nfo@tlerneybros.com B-Ouote #153902 - Rooms 114 & 115 Fire Marshall and Fire Chief Video Eauipment TBI will supply and wall mount an LG 55" 4K LED display in each office. Each display will have an OFE Chief PAC storage box mounted in the wall behind the display pro vided and installed byclient's electrician. Sources will an HDMI wall plate located directly under the display at outlet height input on HDMI 2, an HDMI transmitter wall plate ata location TBD and routed to an HDMI receiver input on HDMI Z. A 12' and 6'HDMI breakout cable will be provided for laptop connectivity. Audio Eauipment Program audio from any source will be heard through the LED displays built in speakers. Control Display on / off, source selection and volume control will be done using the supplied LED display remote control. Note that any channel changes required with the OFE cable TV source device will be done using the OFE remote control that comes with the devise. Client Responsibilities • Provide electrician to install display back boxes and 110V AC service for four (4) outlets in back box • Provide cable TV source device and cable service C-Ouote #153903 - Offices 110,111,112 & 113 Video Eauipment TBI will supply and wall mount an LG 55" 4K LED display in each office. Sources will include an HDMI wall plate located directly under the display at outlet height input on HDMI 1. A 12' HDMI breakout cable will be provided for laptop connectivity. Audio Eauipment Program audio from any source will be heard through the LED displays built in speakers. #TIERNEY 1771 Energy Park Dr. #100, St. Paul, MN 55108 800.933.73371 info@tierneybros.com Control Display on / off, source selection and volume control will be done using the supplied LED display remote control. Note that any channel changes required with the OFE cable TV source device will be done using the OFE remote control that comes with the devise. Client Responsibilities • Provide electrician to install a quad 110V outlet at each display • Provide cable TV source device and cable service D-Ouote #153905 - Conference Room 116 Video Eauipment TBI will supply and install on a tilt style wall mount an LG 65" 4K LED display in the conference room. The display will have an OFE Chief PACstorage box mounted in the wall behind the displayprovided and installed by client's electrician. Sources will include a small form factor OFE PC with HDMI and USB 3.0 connectivity located behind the display in the storage box input on HDMI 2, an HDMI table connection at a TBI provided and installed conference table cable cubby which will be input on HDMI input 1. There will be an OFE wireless keyboard and mouse for PC control. A 6' HDMI breakout cable will be provided for laptop connectivity. Web Conferencinq TBI will wall mount beneath the display a Crestron UC Smart soundbar and camera with an adaptive audio beam forming microphone for web conferencing. The USB connections will be routed to the OFE small form factor PC. Audio Eauipment Program and conference audio will be heard through the conferencing sound bar. Control Svstem TBI will supply and program a Crestron single gang wall controller with the following functionality: • Display power on / off • Source switching • Volume control #TIERNEY 1771 Energy Park Dr. #100, 5t. Paul, MN 55108 800.933.7337 11 nfo@tlerneybros.com Note that any channel changes required with the OFE cable TV source device will be done using the OFE remote control that comes with the devise or the TV remote. Controlled Devices • LED Display: via RS -232 via NVX Encoder / Decoder includes power on / off and source switching • Touch Screen: via POE Ethernet • Audio Processor: via Ethernet • Control Processor: Ethernet Client Responsibilities • Provide electrician to install display back box and 110V AC service for six (6) outlets in back box • Provide table cut out for TBI supplied cable cubby • Provide 110V AC at conference table for 2 outlets in cubby • Provide conduit or plenum wire pathways as required from conference room to storage room 143 • Provide cable TV source device and cable service • Provide network connections at display and table locations E -Quote #153924 - Room 108 Dav Room Video Eauioment TBI will supply and wall mount an LG 75" 4K LED display in each office. The display will have an OFE Chief PAC storage box mounted in the wall behind the display pro vided and installed by clients electrician, Audio Eauioment Program audio from any source will be heard through a Crestron Saros soundbar mounted below the display. Control Display on / off and volume control will be done using the supplied LED display remote control. Note that any channel changes required with the OFE cable TV source device will be done using the OFE remote control that comes with the devise or the TV remote. Client Responsibilities • Provide electrician to install display back boxes and 110V AC service for six (6) outlets in back box #TIERNEY 1771 Energy Park Dr. #100, St. Paul, MN 55108 800.933.7337 1 info@tierneybros.com • Provide cable TV source device and cable service F -Quote #153927 - Room 138 Fitness Room Video Eauipment TBI will supply and wall mount an LG 55" 4K LED display in each office. The display will have an OFE Chief PAC storage box mounted in the waft behind the display provided and installed by cfient's electrician, Audio Eauipment Program audio from any source will be heard through a Crestron Saros soundbar mounted below the display. Control Display on / off and volume control will be done using the supplied LED display remote control. Note that any channel changes required with the OFE cable TV source device will be done using the OFE remote control that comes with the devise or the TV remote. Client Responsibilities • Provide electrician to install display back boxes and 110V AC service for four (4) outlets in back box • Provide cable TV source device and cable service G-Ouote #153929 - Room 123 Gear Grid Room Video Eauipment TBI will supply and install on a tilt style wall mount an LG 55" 4K LED display. The display will have an OFE Chief PAC storage box mounted in the wall behind the display provided and installed by cfient's electrician, Audio Eauipment Program audio from any source will be heard through the LED displays built in speakers. Control Display on / off, source selection and volume control will be done using the supplied LED display remote control. Client Responsibilities #TIERNEY 1771 Energy Park Dr. #100, St. Paul, MN 55108 800.933.7337 11 nfo@tlerneybros.com • Provide electrician to install display back boxes and 110V AC service for four (4) outlets in back box • Provide cable TV source device and cable service H -Quote #153931 - Room 135 Comm / Dispatch Video Eauipment TBI will supply and wall mount an LG 55" 4K LED display. Sources will include an HDMI wall plate located directly under the display at outlet height input on HDMI 1. A 12' HDMI breakout cable will be provided for laptop connectivity. Audio Eauipment Program audio from any source will be heard through the LED displays built in speakers. Control Display on / off, source selection and volume control will be done using the supplied LED display remote control. Note that any channel changes required with the OFE cable TV source device will be done using the OFE remote control that comes with the devise. Client Responsibilities • Provide electrician to install display back boxes and 110V AC service for four (4) outlets in back box • Provide cable TV source device and cable service I-Ouote #153932 History DisDlav Diaital Sionaae Video Eauipment TBI will supply and wall mount an LG 32" LED display in each office. Sources will include a Brightsign digital signage player with a 16GB SD card and mounting bracket. Provisioning and professional services are included. Audio Eauipment Any program audio will be heard through the LED displays built in speakers. #TIERNEY 1771 Energy Park Dr. #100, St. Paul, MN 55108 800.933.7337 11 nfo@tlerneybros.com Control Display on / off will be set using the internal display timer Client Responsibilities Provide electrician to install display quad 110V AC outlet behind the display ]-Ouote #153934 - Station Audio TBI will supply and ceiling mount one (1) 70V ceiling speaker in each room listed in this proposal for station audio paging four (4) horn type 70V speakers will be supplied and installed in the apparatus bay and four (4) 70V speakers will be mounted in the hallway. Six zones are specified with volume controls to be determined by the FD. Source audio will be client provided and the eight channel amplifier will be located in the EOC equipment rack. Client Responsibilities • Provide electrician to install 110V AC outlet at the zone amplifier location TBD Customer Expectations If multiple rooms were quoted, installation pricing for this proposal assumes that all quotes will be signed off on and installed at the same time. If one or more of the quotes in this proposal are not approved, existing quotes will need to be revised to reflect those changes and additional charges may apply. Equipment locations such as closets, or cabinetry may require additional venting, or in some cases dedicated cooling units to keep equipment operating at standard temperatures. We appreciate the opportunity to present this proposal. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us at your convenience at 612-331-5500. Our fax number is 612-331- 3424. Proposal Prepared By: Sales Representative - Mike Chapley Systems Engineer - Tom Tautges Please initial to acknowledge and authorize the Scope of Integration Services presented here. #TIERNEY 1771 Energy Park Drive, Suite 100, St. Paul, MN 55108 (612) 331-5500 1 (800) 933-7337 1 Fax (612) 331-3424 www.tierneybrothers.com Bill To City of Monticello PO Box 1147 505 Walnut St, Suite 1 Monticello MN 55362 Memo: A - Room 141 EOC/Training R1 8/20/2019 592 Mike Chapley Ship To City of Monticello 505 Walnut St Monticello MN 55362 MNS-CPV 152129 Quote #156285 5/22/2019 Display Monitors Display Monitors Mounting Hardware Mounting Hardware Broadcast Video and Production Broadcast Video and Production Control Systems 1 of 5 A -Room 141 EOCITraining Video Display Solution 1 86UU340C LG $3,739.68 $3,739.68 $3,339.00 $3,339.00 12% LG 86UU340C Digital Signage Display - 86" LCD - 3840 x 2160 - Edge LED - 350 Nit - 2160p - HDMI - USBEthernet - Black - TAA Compliant HDMI PDM WOL 240HZ CRESTRON CONNEC 4 55UU340C LG $886.57 $3,546.28 $791.58 $3,166.32 12% LG UU340C 55UU340C 55" 2160p LED -LCD TV - 16:9 - 4K UHDTV - TAA Compliant - ATSC -178° / 178° - 3840 x 2160 - 20 W RMS - Direct LED Backligght - Smart TV - 2 x HDMI - USB - Ethernet 500NIT HDMI CEC 1.4 WOL VESA 1 xSM1U Chief $179.39 $179.39 $160.17 $160.17 12% X -Large Fusion Micro -Adjustable Fixed Wall Display Mount 4 MSM1U Chief $107.25 $429.00 $95.76 $383.04 12% Medium Fusion Micro -Adjustable Fixed Wall Mount Video Source Solution 1 IC101A Black Box $79.60 $79.60 $71.07 $71.07 12% USB 1.1 CATS Extender, 1 -Port 1 DN-500BDMKII Denon $313.60 $313.60 $280.00 $280.00 12% 1 RU Blu-Ray Disc Player Owner Furnished Products - PC (1) Cable Box, Wireless Keyboard and Mouse Audio Solution 1 TesiraFORTE DAN VT Biamp $2,350.88 $2,350.88 $2,099.00 $2,099.00 12% TesiraFORTE DSP fixed I/O server with 12 analog inputs, 8 analog outputs, 8 channels configurable USB audio, 32 x 32 channels of Dante', Acoustic Echo Cancellation (AEC) technology (all 12 inputs), 2 channel VoIP and standard FXO telephone interface HIM IIIIIIIII III 156285 Quote #156285 5/22/2019 Display Monitors Display Monitors Mounting Hardware Mounting Hardware Broadcast Video and Production Broadcast Video and Production Control Systems 1 of 5 #TIERNEY 1771 Energy Park Drive, Suite 100, St. Paul, MN 55108 (612) 331-5500 1 (800) 933-7337 1 Fax (612) 331-3424 www.tierneybrothers.com 1 AMP -1200-70 Crestron $420.00 $420.00 $375.00 $375.00 12% Single -Channel Modular Power Amplifier, 200W, 70V 1 AMP -8075 Crestron $1,792.00 $1,792.00 $1,600.00 $1,600.00 12% Avia- 8 -Channel Power Amplifier, 75W/Ch., 4/8 Ohm or 70V, North America & Japan, 100-120V 8 SAROS IC6T-W-T-EACH Crestron $128.80 $1,030.40 $115.00 $920.00 12% Saros® 6.5" 2 -Way In -Ceiling Speaker, White Textured, Single (must be ordered in multiples of 2) 1 SLX124/85/SM58-G4 Shure $707.84 $707.84 $632.00 $632.00 12% Diversity Receiver, SLX1 Bodypack Transmitter, Microflex' WU85 Cardioid Lavalier Microphone, SLX2/SM58 Handheld Transmitter with SM58 Microphone Control Solution 1 CP3N Crestron $1,456.00 $1,456.00 $1,300.00 $1,300.00 12% 3 -Series Control System" 1 TSW-1060-B-S Crestron $1,344.00 $1,344.00 $1,200.00 $1,200.00 12% 10.1"Touch Screen, Black Smooth Furniture/Rack Solution 1 TesiraFORTE DAN VT Biamp $2,350.88 $2,350.88 $2,099.00 $2,099.00 12% TesiraFORTE DSP fixed I/O server with 12 analog inputs, 8 analog outputs, 8 channels configurable USB audio, 32 x 32 channels of Dante', Acoustic Echo Cancellation (AEC) technology (all 12 inputs), 2 channel VoIP and standard FXO telephone interface 1 IRUR1 Liberty $15.66 $15.66 $13.98 $13.98 12% Rack Header -Image Series1 Rack -Logo 1 Integration Item Middle $620.81 $620.81 $554.30 $554.30 12% CWR-26-22PD Atlantic 4'DATA WALL CAB,PLEXI,22D 1 Integration Item Middle $114.89 $114.89 $102.58 $102.58 12% CWR-FKIT Atlantic FAN KIT FOR CWR SERIES 1 Integration Item Middle $58.73 $58.73 $52.44 $52.44 12% CWR-RR26 Atlantic REAR RAIL KIT,26SP CWR 1 D2 Middle $115.92 $115.92 $103.50 $103.50 12% 2RU 3.5" Rack Drawer Black Brushed Mid- Atlantic Atlantic 5 EB1 Middle $6.18 $30.90 $5.52 $27.60 12% Rack Blank Panel 1 Ru,1.75" Black, Mid Atlantic Atlantic IIIIIII IIIIIIIII III 156285 Quote #156285 5/22/2019 Audio Products Audio Products Broadcast Video and Production Audio Products Control Systems Control Systems Control Systems Audio -Visual Furniture Audio -Visual Furniture Audio -Visual Furniture Audio -Visual Furniture Audio -Visual Furniture Audio -Visual Furniture 2of5 #TIERNEY 1771 Energy Park Drive, Suite 100, St. Paul, MN 55108 (612) 331-5500 1 (800) 933-7337 1 Fax (612) 331-3424 www.tierneybrothers.com Quote #156285 5/22/2019 1 EVT1 Middle $7.72 $7.72 $6.90 $6.90 12% Audio -Visual Vent Panel, 1 RU, Steel Atlantic Furniture 1 HP -Screws Middle $16.49 $16.49 $14.72 $14.72 12% Audio -Visual HP Box of 100 PCS 10-32 Screws Black Atlantic Furniture 1 PD -915R Middle $85.52 $85.52 $76.36 $76.36 12% Video 9 Outlet, Single 15 AMP Circuit, Surge/Spike Protected Rack Mount Power Distribution w/9' Atlantic Products Cord, Black Powder Coat Finish 9OUT, 15A, Rack Mount Power 1 PD -915R -SP Middle $365.28 $365.28 $326.14 $326.14 12% Video Rackmount Power, 9 Outlet, 15A, Series Surge Atlantic Products 1 UFA -841 Middle $35.03 $35.03 $31.28 $31.28 12% Audio -Visual UFA Shelf (1 Space) Atlantic Furniture 1 UFA -842 Middle $37.09 $37.09 $33.12 $33.12 12% UFA Rackshelf, 1 RU, 8"D, w/2 RU Faceplate Atlantic System Core and Infrastructure Solution 10 Integration Item C2G $2.32 $23.18 $2.07 $20.70 12% Cabling 27151 3FT CAT6 SNAGLESS UTP CAB 3 Integration Item C2G $2.92 $8.76 $2.61 $7.83 12% Cabling 03983 61'T CAT6 SNAGLESS UTP CAB 1 SG350X-48P-K9-NA Cisco $1,333.60 $1,333.60 $1,223.49 $1,223.49 9% Broadcast Cisco SG350X-48P Layer 3 Switch Video and Production 5 MHD18G-3PROBLK Comprehensi $12.96 $64.79 $11.56 $57.80 12% Cabling MicroFlex Pro WIT Certified 41<60 18G High Ve Speed HDMI Cable with ProGrip Jet Black 3ft 4 MHD18G-6PROBLK Comprehensi $18.04 $72.17 $16.11 $64.44 12% Cabling MicroFlex Pro AV/IT Certified 41<60 18G High ve Speed HDMI Cable with ProGrip Jet Black 6ft 8 MHD18G-9PROBLK Comprehensi $23.18 $185.47 $20.70 $165.60 12% Cabling MicroFlex Pro AV/IT Certified 41<60 18G Higgh Ve Speed HDMI Cable with ProGrip Jet Black 9ft 1 DMF -CI -8 Crestron $1,120.00 $1,120.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 12% Video MgitalMedia- Card Chassis for DM-NVX-C & Conferencing DMCF, 8 Slots 4 DM-NVX-350 Crestron $1,008.00 $4,032.00 $900.00 $3,600.00 12% Broadcast DigitalMedia- 4K60 4:4:4 HDR Network AV Video and Production Encoder/Decoder 1 DM-NVX-352 Crestron $1,344.00 $1,344.00 $1,200.00 $1,200.00 12% Broadcast DigitalMedia- 4K60 4:4:4 HDR Network AV Video and Production Encoder/Decoder with Dante® Audio 1111111 III I II111 III 3 of 5 156285 #TIERNEY Quote #156285 1771 Energy Park Drive, Suite 100, St. Paul, MN 55108 (612) 331-5500 1 (800) 933-7337 1 Fax (612) 331-3424 5/22/2019 www.tierneybrothers.com 4 DM-NVX-E30C Crestron $728.00 $2,912.00 $650.00 $2,600.00 12% Broadcast DigitalMedia- 4K60 4:4:4 HDR Network AV Video and Production Encoder Card 4 HD-EXT3-C-B SYSTEM Crestron $560.00 $2,240.00 $500.00 $2,000.00 12% Broadcast HDMI" over HDBaseT' Extenderw/IR & RS -232, Video and Production Black 250 18-2C-P-BLK Liberty $0.13 $33.60 $0.12 $30.00 12% Cabling 18/02C STR BC CL3P Plenum Control Cable Black 150 22-2C-PSH-BLK Liberty $0.11 $16.80 $0.10 $15.00 12% Cabling Black Audio and control 22 AWG 1 pair shielded plenum 350 24-4P-PL6-EN-BLK Liberty $0.30 $105.46 $0.269 $94.15 12% Cabling Plenum CAT6 1000ft reel 1 BOOT-L-BLK Liberty $17.58 $17.58 $15.70 $15.70 12% Cabling LAN/RJ45 Snag Free Connector Strain Relief Boots for Large Cable Bag - priced per bag - 50pcs 4 PC -G1791 -E -P -C Liberty $19.93 $79.70 $17.79 $71.16 12% Cabling Panelcrafters precision manufactured HDMI female pigtail 40 11108080034 Liberty $0.64 $25.54 $0.57 $22.80 12% Cabling Category 6 one-piece crimp RJ45 plug 1 NC3FXX Neutrik $2.78 $2.78 $2.48 $2.48 12% Cabling Neutrik NC3FXX 3 Pin Female XLR Nickel/Silver 1 Minnesota State Contract - Associated $500.00 $500.00 Hardware 6 Minnesota State Contract - Design / $120.00 $720.00 Engineering Professional/Technical Design Service; Engineering and Design 21 Minnesota State Contract- Project $90.00 $1,890.00 Management 13 Minnesota State Contract -In-House $90.00 $1,170.00 Installation 48 Minnesota State Contract - On -Site $90.00 $4,320.00 Installation 30 Minnesota State Contract -Programming and $120.00 $3,600.00 Configuration Professional/Technical Design Service; Programming and Configuration 1111111111111111111 4 of 5 156285 #TIERNEY 1771 Energy Park Drive, Suite 100, St. Paul, MN 55108 (612) 331-5500 1 (800) 933-7337 1 Fax (612) 331-3424 www.tierneybrothers.com Minnesota State Contract - Maintenance / Service (1 Year) Maintenance / Service; One Year Installation Warranty If tax has not been included on this proposal, pricing does not include Minnesota General Sales Tax under Minnesota Statues Chapter 297A Section 70 "Exemptions for Governments and Nonprofit Groups." Please inform us if this project will be used for taxable purposes. If tax has been included on this proposal, we do not have a tax exempt form on file for your account. Please provide a completed Form ST3, Certificate of Exemption if applicable. $1,299.00 $1,299.00 Subtotal Tax (0%) Shipping Cost Total To accept this quotation, sign here : Please reference this quote number on your purchase order. Please inspect product upon delivery. State of Minnesota Contract Return Policy will apply. Standard Times for Delivery from Receipt of PO*: • Stocked Product Equipment Only Sales - Three to Five Business Days • Non -Stocked Product Equipment Only Sales - Ten to 14 Business Days • Integration Projects - Two to Eight Weeks *All days include time in transit and assume product is not on back order with the manufacturer. 1111111 111/11111 III 156285 Quote #156285 5/22/2019 $48,360.02 $0.00 $918.44 $49,278.46 5 of 5 #TIERNEY 1771 Energy Park Drive, Suite 100, St. Paul, MN 55108 (612) 331-5500 1 (800) 933-7337 1 Fax (612) 331-3424 www.tierneybrothers.com Bill To City of Monticello PO Box 1147 505 Walnut St, Suite 1 Monticello MN 55362 Memo: B - Rooms 114,115 R1 Expires Sales Rep 8/20/2019 592 Mike Chapley Ship To City of Monticello 505 Walnut St Monticello MN 55362 MNS-CPV 152129 B -Rooms 114, 115 Fire Marshall/Fire Chief R1 Video Display Solution 2 SSUU340C LG $886.57 $1,773.14 $791.58 $1,583.16 12% LG UU340C 55UU340C 55" 2160p LED -LCD TV - 16:9 - 4K UHDTV - TAA Compliant - ATSC - 178° / 178° - 3840 x 2160 - 20 W RMS - Direct LED Backlight - Smart TV - 2 x HDMI - USB - Ethernet 500NIT HDMI CEC 1.4 WOL VESA Owner Furnished Product - PAC526FBP4 IN -WALL LARGE BLK - W/ SURGEX 2 OUTLE 2 MSM1U Chief $107.25 $214.50 $95.76 $191.52 12% Medium Fusion Micro -Adjustable Fixed Wall Mount Video Source Solution Owner Furnished Products - Cable Source Devices (2) 2 PC -G1791 -E -P -C Liberty $19.93 $39.85 $17.79 $35.58 12% Panelcrafters precision manufactured HDMI female pigtail 2 HD-EXT3-C-W SYSTEM Crestron $560.00 $1,120.00 $500.00 $1,000.00 12% 4K HDMI' over HDBaseT' Extender w/IR & RS -232, White; includes HD-RX3-C-B and HD- TX3-C-W 2 WP -DEC -WH Liberty $0.58 $1.16 $0.52 $1.04 12% Keystone Decorator Style 1 gang smooth faceplate System Core and Infrastructure Solution 2 MHD18G-3PROBLK Comprehensi $12.96 $25.92 $11.56 $23.12 12% MicroFlex Pro AV/IT Certified 41<60 18G High ve Speed HDMI Cable with ProGrip Jet Black 3ft 1111111 VIII 1111 III 156295 Quote #156295 5/22/2019 Display Monitors Mounting Hardware Cabling Broadcast Video and Production Control Systems Cabling 1 of 3 #TIERNEY Quote #156295 1771 Energy Park Drive, Suite 100, St. Paul, MN 55108 (612) 331-5500 1 (800) 933-7337 1 Fax (612) 331-3424 5/22/2019 www.tierneybrothers.com 2 MHD18G-6PROBLK Comprehensi $18.05 $36.09 $16.11 $32.22 12% Cabling MicroFlex Pro AWIT Certified 41<60 18G High ve Speed HDMI Cable with ProGripJet Black 6ft 2 MHD18G-9PROBLK Comprehensi $23.19 $46.37 $20.70 $41.40 12% Cabling MicroFlex Pro AWIT Certified 41<60 18G High ve Speed HDMI Cable with ProGripJet Black 9ft 2 MHD18G-9PROBLK Comprehensi $23.19 $46.37 $20.70 $41.40 12% Cabling MicroFlex Pro AWIT Certified 41<60 18G Higgh ve Speed HDMI Cable with ProGripJet Black 9ft 2 MHD18G-12PROBLKA Comprehensi $34.07 $68.14 $30.42 $60.84 12% Cabling MicroFlex Pro AWIT Certified 4K60 18G High ve Speed HDMI Cable with ProGripJet Black 12ft 150 24-4P-P-LSSH-BLK Liberty $0.32 $48.72 $0.29 $43.50 12% Cabling Black Category 5e F/UTP EN series plenum 24 AWG 4 pair shielded cable Reel 6 1000SUSOP Liberty $0.30 $1.81 $0.27 $1.62 12% Cabling Clear Liberty Category 5e one-piece crimp RJ45 plug (bought in packs of 100, sold individually) 1 Minnesota State Contract - Associated $500.00 $500.00 Hardware 3 Minnesota State Contract - Design / $120.00 $360.00 Engineering Professional/Technical Design Service; Engineering and Design 7 Minnesota State Contract - Project $90.00 $630.00 Management 2 Minnesota State Contract -In-House $90.00 $180.00 Installation 20 Minnesota State Contract - On -Site $90.00 $1,800.00 Installation 1 Minnesota State Contract - Maintenance / $599.00 $599.00 Service (1 Year) Maintenance / Service; One Year Installation Warranty HIMIIIIIIIIIIII 2of3 156295 #TIERNEY 1771 Energy Park Drive, Suite 100, St. Paul, MN 55108 (612) 331-5500 1 (800) 933-7337 1 Fax (612) 331-3424 www.tierneybrothers.com If tax has not been included on this proposal, pricing does not include Minnesota General Sales Tax under Minnesota Statues Chapter 297A Section 70 "Exemptions for Governments and Nonprofit Groups." Please inform us if this project will be used for taxable purposes. If tax has been included on this proposal, we do not have a tax exempt form on file for your account. Please provide a completed Form ST3, Certificate of Exemption if applicable. Subtotal Tax (0%) Shipping Cost Total To accept this quotation, sign here : Please reference this quote number on your purchase order. Please inspect product upon delivery. State of Minnesota Contract Return Policy will apply. Standard Times for Delivery from Receipt of PO*: • Stocked Product Equipment Only Sales - Three to Five Business Days • Non -Stocked Product Equipment Only Sales - Ten to 14 Business Days • Integration Projects - Two to Eight Weeks *All days include time in transit and assume product is not on back order with the manufacturer. 1111111 VIII 1I II III 156295 Quote #156295 5/22/2019 $7,491.07 $0.00 $496.17 $7,987.24 3 of 3 #TIERNEY 1771 Energy Park Drive, Suite 100, St. Paul, MN 55108 (612) 331-5500 1 (800) 933-7337 1 Fax (612) 331-3424 www.tierneybrothers.com Bill To City of Monticello PO Box 1147 505 Walnut St, Suite 1 Monticello MN 55362 Memo: C - Rooms 110, 111, 112,113 R1 Expires Sales Rep 8/20/2019 592 Mike Chapley Ship To City of Monticello 505 Walnut St Monticello MN 55362 MNS-CPV 152129 C- Rooms 110, 111, 112,113 R1 Video Display Solution 4 SSUU340C LG $886.57 $3,546.28 $791.58 $3,166.32 12% LG UU340C 55UU340C 55" 2160p LED -LCD TV - 16:9 - 4K UHDTV - TAA Compliant - ATSC - 178° / 178° - 3840 x 2160 - 20 W RMS - Direct LED Backlight - Smart TV - 2 x HDMI - USB - Ethernet 500NIT HDMI CEC 1.4 WOL VESA 4 MSM1U Chief $107.25 $429.00 $95.76 $383.04 12% Medium Fusion Micro -Adjustable Fixed Wall Mount Video Source Solution Owner Furnished Products - Cable Source Devices (4) 4 PC -G1791 -E -P -C Liberty $19.93 $79.70 $17.79 $71.16 12% Panelcrafters precision manufactured HDMI female pigtail System Core and Infrastructure Solution 4 MHD18G-12PROBLKA Comprehensi $34.07 $136.28 $30.42 $121.68 12% MicroFlex Pro AV/IT Certified 41<60 18G High ve Speed HDMI Cable with ProGrip Jet Black 12ft 4 MHD18G-3PROBLK Comprehensi $12.96 $51.83 $11.57 $46.28 12% MicroFlex Pro AV/IT Certified 41<60 18G High ve Speed HDMI Cable with ProGrip Jet Black 3ft 4 MHD18G-9PROBLK Comprehensi $23.19 $92.74 $20.70 $82.80 12% MicroFlex Pro AV/IT Certified 41<60 18G High ve Speed HDMI Cable with ProGrip Jet Black 9ft 1 Minnesota State Contract - Associated $500.00 $500.00 Hardware IIIIIII I III IIII III 153903 Quote #153903 5/22/2019 Display Monitors Mounting Hardware Cabling Cabling Cabling Cabling 1 of 2 #TIERNEY Quote #153903 1771 Energy Park Drive, Suite 100, St. Paul, MN 55108 (612) 331-5500 1 (800) 933-7337 1 Fax (612) 331-3424 5/22/2019 www.tierneybrothers.com Qty Item MFG Price Ext. Price Cost Ext Cost Markup % Category 2 Minnesota State Contract - Design / $120.00 $240.00 Engineering Professional/Technical Design Service; Engineering and Design 9 Minnesota State Contract - Project $90.00 $810.00 Management 2 Minnesota State Contract -In-House $90.00 $180.00 Installation 22 Minnesota State Contract- On -Site $90.00 $1,980.00 Installation 1 Minnesota State Contract - Maintenance / $599.00 $599.00 Service (1 Year) Maintenance / Service; One Year Installation warranty If tax has not been included on this proposal, pricing does not include Minnesota General Sales Tax under Minnesota Statues Chapter 297A Section 70 "Exemptions for Governments and Nonprofit Groups." Please inform us if this project will be used for taxable purposes. If tax has been included on this proposal, we do not have a tax exempt form on file for your account. Please provide a completed Form ST3, Certificate of Exemption if applicable. Subtotal $8,644.83 Tax (0%) $0.00 Shipping Cost $498.71 Total $9,143.54 To accept this quotation, sign here : Please reference this quote number on your purchase order. Please inspect product upon delivery. State of Minnesota Contract Return Policy will apply. Standard Times for Delivery from Receipt of PO*: • Stocked Product Equipment Only Sales - Three to Five Business Days • Non -Stocked Product Equipment Only Sales - Ten to 14 Business Days • Integration Projects - Two to Eight Weeks *All days include time in transit and assume product is not on back order with the manufacturer. IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 2of2 153903 #TIERNEY Quote #156317 1771 Energy Park Drive, Suite 100, St. Paul, MN 55108 (612) 331-5500 1 (800) 933-7337 1 Fax (612) 331-3424 5/22/2019 www.tierneybrothers.com Bill To Ship To City of Monticello City of Monticello PO Box 1147 505 Walnut St 505 Walnut St, Suite 1 Monticello MN 55362 Monticello MN 55362 Memo: D - Room 116; Conference Room R1 8/20/2019 592 Mike Chapley MNS-CPV 152129 D -Room 116; Conference Room Video Display Solution 1 65UU340C LG $1,294.93 $1,294.93 $1,156.19 $1,156.19 12% Display LG UU340C 65UU340C 65" 2160p LED -LCD TV - Monitors 16:9 - 4K UHDTV - TAA Compliant - ATSC - 178° / 178° - 3840 x 2160 - 20 W RMS - Direct LED Backlight - Smart TV - 2 x HDMI - USB - Ethernet 500NIT HDMI CEC 1.4 WOL VESA 1 LSMIU Chief $135.34 $135.34 $120.84 $120.84 12% Mounting Large Fusion Micro -Adjustable Fixed Wall Hardware Display Mount Owner Furnished Product-PAC526FBP6 IN -WALL LARGE ELK - W/ SURGEX 3 OUTLETS Video Source Solution 1 60-1404-02 Extron $280.00 $280.00 $250.00 $250.00 12% Control Cable Cubby 500 Systems Series/2 Cable Access Enclosure for AV Connectivity and AC Power - Black -with US AC Power Module Owner Furnished Products - Cable Source Devices & PC Audio Solution 1 28727 C2G $27.18 $27.18 $24.27 $24.27 12% Broadcast Toslink to Dual RCA - Audio Converter Video and Production 1 UC -SBI -CAM Crestron $1,568.00 $1,568.00 $1,400.00 $1,400.00 12% Broadcast UC Video Conference Smart Sound Bar & Video and Production Camera Control Solution 1111111111111111111 1 of 156317 #TIERNEY Quote #156317 1771 Energy Park Drive, Suite 100, St. Paul, MN 55108 (612) 331-5500 1 (800) 933-7337 1 Fax (612) 331-3424 5/22/2019 www.tierneybrothers.com 3 MPB3/MPC3-BTN3-B ENGRAVED Crestron $8.40 $25.20 $7.50 $22.50 12% Control Backlit Engravable Icon Chips for MPC3-201-B, Systems Black, Set of 3, Includes Custom Engraving 1 MPC3-101-B Crestron $364.00 $364.00 $325.00 $325.00 12% Control MPC3-101-B Systems 3 -Series® Media Presentation Controller 101, Black 1 PWE-4803RU Crestron $56.00 $56.00 $50.00 $50.00 12% Control Crestron PoE Injector100-250 Volts AC Universal Systems System Core and Infrastructure Solution 1 40390 C2G $5.73 $5.73 $5.12 $5.12 12% Cabling 1.OM VELOCITY TOSLINK CAB 1 Integration Item C2G $6.31 $6.31 $5.63 $5.63 12% Cabling 40613 VELO 3.5 M STEREO TO (2) 2 MHD18G-3PROBLK Comprehensi $12.96 $25.92 $11.56 $23.12 12% Cabling MicroFlex Pro AV/IT Certified 4K60 18G High ve Speed HDMI Cable with ProGrip Jet Black 3ft 1 MHD18G-6PROBLK Comprehensi $18.04 $18.04 $16.11 $16.11 12% Cabling MicroFlex Pro AV/IT Certified 4K60 18G High ve Speed HDMI Cable with ProGrip Jet Black 6ft 1 USB3-AB-6ST Comprehensi $7.91 $7.91 $7.06 $7.06 12% Cabling USB 3.0 A Male To B Male Cable 6ft. ve 1 60-1271-12 Extron $263.20 $263.20 $235.00 $235.00 12% Broadcast HDMI Twisted Pair Extender - Tx Video and Production 1 60-1271-13 Extron $263.20 $263.20 $235.00 $235.00 12% Broadcast HDMI Twisted Pair Extender- Rx Video and Production 1 70-077-01 Extron $28.00 $28.00 $25.00 $25.00 12% Audio -Visual Low -Profile Mount Kit for 1/4 and 1/2 Rack Furniture Width, Two -Piece Enclosures 75 22-235-03 Extron $1.34 $100.38 $1.19506667 $89.63 12% Cabling XTP DTP 24 Shielded Twisted Pair Cable for XTP Systems and DTP Series Products Plenum 1000'(305 m) spool 1 101-005-02 Extron $28.00 $28.00 $25.00 $25.00 12% Cabling XTP DTP 24 Plug Shielded RJ -45 Plug Kit for Extron XTP DTP 24 Shielded Twisted Pair Cable Package of 10 1111111111111111111 2 of 156317 #TIERNEY 1771 Energy Park Drive, Suite 100, St. Paul, MN 55108 (612) 331-5500 1 (800) 933-7337 1 Fax (612) 331-3424 www.tierneybrothers.com 1 Minnesota State Contract -Associated $500.00 $500.00 Hardware 2 Minnesota State Contract - Design / $120.00 $240.00 Engineering Professional/Technical Design Service; Engineering and Design 4 Minnesota State Contract - Project $90.00 $360.00 Management 2 Minnesota State Contract -In-House $90.00 $180.00 Installation 14 Minnesota State Contract- On -Site $90.00 $1,260.00 Installation 4 Minnesota State Contract - Programming and $120.00 $480.00 Configuration Professional/Technical Design Service; Programming and Configuration 1 Minnesota State Contract- Maintenance/ $599.00 $599.00 Service (1 Year) Maintenance / Service; One Year Installation Warranty If tax has not been included on this proposal, pricing does not include Minnesota General Sales Tax under Minnesota Statues Chapter 297A Section 70 "Exemptions for Governments and Nonprofit Groups.' Please inform us if this project will be used for taxable purposes. If tax has been included on this proposal, we do not have a tax exempt form on file for your account. Please provide a completed Form ST3, Certificate of Exemption if applicable. Subtotal Tax (0%) Shipping Cost Total 111111111 1111111111 156317 Quote #156317 5/22/2019 $8,116.34 $0.00 $212.33 $8,328.67 3 of 4 #TIERNEY Quote #156317 1771 Energy Park Drive, Suite 100, St. Paul, MN 55108 (612) 331-5500 1 (800) 933-7337 Fax (612) 331-3424 5/22/2019 www.tierneybrothers.com To accept this quotation, sign here Please reference this quote number on your purchase order. Please inspect product upon delivery. State of Minnesota Contract Return Policy will apply. Standard Times for Delivery from Receipt of PO*: • Stocked Product Equipment Only Sales - Three to Five Business Days • Non-Stocked Product Equipment Only Sales - Ten to 14 Business Days • Integration Projects - Two to Eight Weeks *All days include time in transit and assume product is not on back order with the manufacturer. 1111111111111111111 4 of 4 156317 #TIERNEY 1771 Energy Park Drive, Suite 100, St. Paul, MN 55108 (612) 331-5500 1 (800) 933-7337 1 Fax (612) 331-3424 www.tierneybrothers.com Bill To City of Monticello PO Box 1147 505 Walnut St, Suite 1 Monticello MN 55362 Memo: E - Room 108; Day Room R1 8/20/2019 E - Room 108; Day Room Video Display Solution 592 Mike Chapley Ship To City of Monticello 505 Walnut St Monticello MN 55362 MNS-CPV 152129 1 75UU340C LG $2,315.04 $2,315.04 $2,067.00 $2,067.00 12% LG 75UU340C Digital Signage Display - 75" LCD - 3840 x 2160 - Edge LED - 350 Nit - 2160p - HDMI - USBEthernet - Black - TAA Compliant HDMI PDM WOL 240HZ CRESTRON CONNECT 1 xSM1U Chief $179.39 $179.39 $160.17 $160.17 12% X -Large Fusion Micro -Adjustable Fixed Wall Display Mount Owner Furnished Product-PAC526FBP6 IN -WALL LARGE ELK - W/ SURGEX 3 OUTLETS Video Source Solution Owner Furnished Products - Cable Source Device Audio Solution 1 28727 C2G $27.18 $27.18 $24.27 $24.27 12% Toslink to Dual RCA - Audio Converter 1 SAROS SB -200 -P -B Crestron $280.00 $280.00 $250.00 $250.00 12% Saros@ Sound Bar 200, Powered, Black System Core and Infrastructure Solution 1 40390 C2G $5.73 1.OM VELOCITY TOSLINK CAB 2 MHD18G-3PROBLK Comprehensi $12.96 MicroFlex Pro AV/IT Certified 41<60 18G High ve Speed HDMI Cable with ProGrip Jet Black 3ft 1111111111111111111 156321 Quote #156321 5/22/2019 Display Monitors Mounting Hardware Broadcast Video and Production Audio Products $5.73 $5.12 $5.12 12% Cabling $25.92 $11.56 $23.12 12% Cabling 1 of 2 #TIERNEY Quote #156321 1771 Energy Park Drive, Suite 100, St. Paul, MN 55108 (612) 331-5500 1 (800) 933-7337 1 Fax (612) 331-3424 5/22/2019 www.tierneybrothers.com 1 Minnesota State Contract -Associated $350.00 $350.00 Hardware 3 Minnesota State Contract - Design / $120.00 $360.00 Engineering Professional/Technical Design Service; Engineering and Design 4 Minnesota State Contract - Project $90.00 $360.00 Management 2 Minnesota State Contract -In-House $90.00 $180.00 Installation 11 Minnesota State Contract - On -Site $90.00 $990.00 Installation 1 Minnesota State Contract- Maintenance/ $599.00 $599.00 Service (1 Year) Maintenance / Service; One Year Installation Warranty If tax has not been included on this proposal, pricing does not include Minnesota General Sales Tax under Minnesota Statues Chapter 297A Section 70 "Exemptions for Governments and Nonprofit Groups." Please inform us if this project will be used for taxable purposes. If tax has been included on this proposal, we do not have a tax exempt form on file for your account. Please provide a completed Form ST3, Certificate of Exemption if applicable. Subtotal $5,672.26 Tax (0%) $0.00 Shipping Cost $211.81 Total $5,884.07 To accept this quotation, sign here Please reference this quote number on your purchase order. Please inspect product upon delivery. State of Minnesota Contract Return Policy will apply. Standard Times for Delivery from Receipt of PO*: • Stocked Product Equipment Only Sales - Three to Five Business Days • Non -Stocked Product Equipment Only Sales - Ten to 14 Business Days • Integration Projects - Two to Eight Weeks *All days include time in transit and assume product is not on back order with the manufacturer. 111111111111111111111 2 oft 156321 #TIERNEY 1771 Energy Park Drive, Suite 100, St. Paul, MN 55108 (612) 331-5500 1 (800) 933-7337 1 Fax (612) 331-3424 www.tierneybrothers.com Bill To City of Monticello PO Box 1147 505 Walnut St, Suite 1 Monticello MN 55362 Memo: F - Room 138; Fitness R1 8/20/2019 F - Room 138; Fitness Video Display Solution 592 Mike Chapley Ship To City of Monticello 505 Walnut St Monticello MN 55362 MNS-CPV 152129 1 SSUU340C LG $886.57 $886.57 $791.58 $791.58 12% LG UU340C 55UU340C 55" 2160p LED -LCD TV - 16:9 - 4K UHDTV - TAA Compliant - ATSC - 178° / 178° - 3840 x 2160 - 20 W RMS - Direct LED Backlight - Smart TV - 2 x HDMI - USB - Ethernet 500NIT HDMI CEC 1.4 WOL VESA 1 MSM1U Chief $107.25 $107.25 $95.76 $95.76 12% Medium Fusion Micro -Adjustable Fixed Wall Mount Owner Furnished Product - PAC526FBP6 IN -WALL LARGE ELK - W/ SURGEX 3 OUTLETS Video Source Solution Owner Furnished Products - Cable Source Device Audio Solution 1 28727 C2G $27.18 $27.18 $24.27 $24.27 12% Toslink to Dual RCA - Audio Converter 1 SAROS S113 -200-P-113 Crestron $280.00 $280.00 $250.00 $250.00 12% Saros® Sound Bar 200, Powered, Black System Core and Infrastructure Solution 1 40390 C2G $5.73 1.OM VELOCITY TOSLINK CAB 2 MHD18G-3PROBLK Comprehensi $12.96 MicroFlex Pro AV/IT Certified 41<60 18G High ve Speed HDMI Cable with ProGrip Jet Black 3ft 1111111111111111 III 156322 Quote #156322 5/22/2019 Display Monitors Mounting Hardware Broadcast Video and Production Audio Products $5.73 $5.12 $5.12 12% Cabling $25.92 $11.56 $23.12 12% Cabling 1 of 2 #TIERNEY Quote #156322 1771 Energy Park Drive, Suite 100, St. Paul, MN 55108 (612) 331-5500 1 (800) 933-7337 1 Fax (612) 331-3424 5/22/2019 www.tierneybrothers.com 1 Minnesota State Contract -Associated $350.00 $350.00 Hardware 3 Minnesota State Contract - Design / $120.00 $360.00 Engineering Professional/Technical Design Service; Engineering and Design 3 Minnesota State Contract - Project $90.00 $270.00 Management 2 Minnesota State Contract -In-House $90.00 $180.00 Installation 9 Minnesota State Contract - On -Site $90.00 $810.00 Installation 1 Minnesota State Contract- Maintenance/ $299.00 $299.00 Service (1 Year) Maintenance / Service; One Year Installation Warranty If tax has not been included on this proposal, pricing does not include Minnesota General Sales Tax under Minnesota Statues Chapter 297A Section 70 "Exemptions for Governments and Nonprofit Groups." Please inform us if this project will be used for taxable purposes. If tax has been included on this proposal, we do not have a tax exempt form on file for your account. Please provide a completed Form ST3, Certificate of Exemption if applicable. Subtotal $3,601.65 Tax (0%) $0.00 Shipping Cost $164.72 Total $3,766.37 To accept this quotation, sign here Please reference this quote number on your purchase order. Please inspect product upon delivery. State of Minnesota Contract Return Policy will apply. Standard Times for Delivery from Receipt of PO*: • Stocked Product Equipment Only Sales - Three to Five Business Days • Non -Stocked Product Equipment Only Sales - Ten to 14 Business Days • Integration Projects - Two to Eight Weeks *All days include time in transit and assume product is not on back order with the manufacturer. 1111111111111111111 l of t 156322 #TIERNEY 1771 Energy Park Drive, Suite 100, St. Paul, MN 55108 (612) 331-5500 1 (800) 933-7337 1 Fax (612) 331-3424 www.tierneybrothers.com Bill To City of Monticello PO Box 1147 505 Walnut St, Suite 1 Monticello MN 55362 Memo: G - Room 123 Gear/Grid R1 8/20/2019 592 Mike Chapley G - Room 123 Gear/Grid Video Display Solution 1 55UU340C LG LG UU340C 55UU340C 55" 2160p LED -LCD TV - 16:9 - 4K UHDTV - TAA Compliant - ATSC - 178° / 178° - 3840 x 2160 - 20 W RMS - Direct LED Backlight - Smart TV - 2 x HDMI - USB - Ethernet 500NIT HDMI CEC 1.4 WOL VESA 1 MSM1U Chief Medium Fusion Micro -Adjustable Fixed Wall Mount Video Source Solution System Core and Infrastructure Solution 1 Minnesota State Contract- Associated Hardware 2 Minnesota State Contract - Design / Engineering Professional/Technical Design Service; Engineering and Design 2 Minnesota State Contract- Project Management 2 Minnesota State Contract -In-House Installation 4 Minnesota State Contract - On -Site Installation Ship To City of Monticello 505 Walnut St Monticello MN 55362 MNS-CPV 152129 NEW $886.56 $886.56 $791.58 $791.58 12% $107.25 $107.25 $95.76 $95.76 12% $350.00 $350.00 $120.00 $240.00 $90.00 $180.00 $90.00 $180.00 $90.00 $360.00 Quote #156331 5/22/2019 Display Monitors Mounting Hardware 111111111 II 11111 III 1 of 2 156331 #TIERNEY 1771 Energy Park Drive, Suite 100, St. Paul, MN 55108 (612) 331-5500 1 (800) 933-7337 1 Fax (612) 331-3424 www.tierneybrothers.com Minnesota State Contract - Maintenance / Service (1 Year) Maintenance / Service; One Year Installation Warranty If tax has not been included on this proposal, pricing does not include Minnesota General Sales Tax under Minnesota Statues Chapter 297A Section 70 "Exemptions for Governments and Nonprofit Groups." Please inform us if this project will be used for taxable purposes. If tax has been included on this proposal, we do not have a tax exempt form on file for your account. Please provide a completed Form ST3, Certificate of Exemption if applicable. $299.00 $299.00 Subtotal Tax (0%) Shipping Cost Total To accept this quotation, sign here : Please reference this quote number on your purchase order. Please inspect product upon delivery. State of Minnesota Contract Return Policy will apply. Standard Times for Delivery from Receipt of PO*: • Stocked Product Equipment Only Sales - Three to Five Business Days • Non -Stocked Product Equipment Only Sales - Ten to 14 Business Days • Integration Projects - Two to Eight Weeks *All days include time in transit and assume product is not on back order with the manufacturer. 1111111111111111111 156331 Quote #156331 5/22/2019 $2,602.81 $0.00 $153.98 $2,756.79 2 of 2 #TIERNEY 1771 Energy Park Drive, Suite 100, St. Paul, MN 55108 (612) 331-5500 1 (800) 933-7337 1 Fax (612) 331-3424 www.tierneybrothers.com Bill To City of Monticello PO Box 1147 505 Walnut St, Suite 1 Monticello MN 55362 Memo: H - Room 135; Comm/Dispatch R1 Expires Sales Rep 8/20/2019 592 Mike Chapley Ship To City of Monticello 505 Walnut St Monticello MN 55362 MNS-CPV 152129 H - Room 135; Comm/Dispatch Video Display Solution 1 SSUU340C LG $886.56 $886.56 $791.58 $791.58 12% LG UU340C 55UU340C 55" 2160p LED -LCD TV - 16:9 - 4K UHDTV - TAA Compliant - ATSC - 178° / 178° - 3840 x 2160 - 20 W RMS - Direct LED Backlight - Smart TV - 2 x HDMI - USB - Ethernet 500NIT HDMI CEC 1.4 WOL VESA 1 MSM1U Chief $107.25 $107.25 $95.76 $95.76 12% Medium Fusion Micro -Adjustable Fixed Wall Mount Video Source Solution 1 PC -G1791 -E -P -C Liberty $19.92 $19.92 $17.79 $17.79 12% Panelcrafters precision manufactured HDMI female pigtail Owner Furnished Product - Cable Source Device System Core and Infrastructure Solution 1 MHD18G-12PROBLKA Comprehensi $34.07 $34.07 $30.42 $30.42 12% MicroFlex Pro AV/IT Certified 41<60 18G High ve Speed HDMI Cable with ProGrip Jet Black 12ft 1 MHD18G-9PROBLK Comprehensi $23.18 $23.18 $20.70 $20.70 12% MicroFlex Pro AWIT Certified 41<60 18G High ve Speed HDMI Cable with ProGrip Jet Black 9ft 1 Minnesota State Contract -Associated $350.00 $350.00 Hardware 2 Minnesota State Contract - Design / $120.00 $240.00 Engineering Professional/Technical Design Service; Engineering and Design 31 IIIIIII III VIII III 1539 Quote #153931 5/22/2019 Display Monitors Mounting Hardware Cabling Cabling Cabling 1 of 2 #TIERNEY Quote #153931 1771 Energy Park Drive, Suite 100, St. Paul, MN 55108 (612) 331-5500 1 (800) 933-7337 1 Fax (612) 331-3424 5/22/2019 www.tierneybrothers.com Qty Item MFG Price Ext. Price Cost Ext Cost Markup % Category 3 Minnesota State Contract - Project $90.00 $270.00 Management 2 Minnesota State Contract -In-House $90.00 $180.00 Installation 6 Minnesota State Contract - On -Site $90.00 $540.00 Installation 1 Minnesota State Contract - Maintenance / $299.00 $299.00 Service (1 Year) Maintenance / Service; One Year Installation warranty If tax has not been included on this proposal, pricing does not include Minnesota General Sales Tax under Minnesota Statues Chapter 297A Section 70 "Exemptions for Governments and Nonprofit Groups." Please inform us if this project will be used for taxable purposes. If tax has been included on this proposal, we do not have a tax exempt form on file for your account. Please provide a completed Form ST3, Certificate of Exemption if applicable. Subtotal $2,949.98 Tax (0%) $0.00 Shipping Cost $156.49 Total $3,106.47 To accept this quotation, sign here : Please reference this quote number on your purchase order. Please inspect product upon delivery. State of Minnesota Contract Return Policy will apply. Standard Times for Delivery from Receipt of PO*: • Stocked Product Equipment Only Sales - Three to Five Business Days • Non -Stocked Product Equipment Only Sales - Ten to 14 Business Days • Integration Projects - Two to Eight Weeks *All days include time in transit and assume product is not on back order with the manufacturer. IIIIIIII I II VIII III 2 of 2 153931 #TIERNEY 1771 Energy Park Drive, Suite 100, St. Paul, MN 55108 (612) 331-5500 1 (800) 933-7337 1 Fax (612) 331-3424 www.tierneybrothers.com Bill To City of Monticello PO Box 1147 505 Walnut St, Suite 1 Monticello MN 55362 Memo: I - Room 142; History Display R1 8/20/2019 592 Mike Chapley Ship To City of Monticello 505 Walnut St Monticello MN 55362 MNS-CPV 152129 I - Room 142; History Display R1 Video Display Solution 1 32LV340C LG $308.57 $308.57 $275.51 $275.51 12% LG 32LV340C - 32" Class (31.5" viewable) - LV340C series LED TV - digital signage / hospitality - 720p - direct -lit LED 1 FSR1U Chief $45.33 $45.33 $40.47 $40.47 12% Small Flat Panel Fixed Wall Display Mount Video Source Solution 1 uSDHC-16C10-1 Bright5ign $21.00 $21.00 $18.75 $18.75 12% Bright5ign approved 16GB class 10 MicroSD card. Compatible with LS423, HD223, HD1023, XD233, XD1033, XT243 & XT1143 players. 1 XD234 BrightSign $327.60 $327.60 $292.50 $292.50 12% H.265, True 4K, dual video decode, advanced HTML5 player with standard I/O package 1 FCA110 Chief $14.17 $14.17 $12.65 $12.65 12% FCA110 Fusion CATS/Surge/CPU Adapter 1 EDGE-DIGIPROVISION1-ITSM-TBITierney $130.00 $130.00 $97.50 $97.50 33% EDGE Digital Signage Device Provisioning- 1 unit Brothers, Inc. 1 Edge -DS -Lifeline -Service -1 Year $20.00 $20.00 $12.00 $12.00 67% Ongoing technical support for players. Quantity is the total number of player. 1 Year Service. 2 EDGE-DIGITRAIN-ITSM-TBI $150.00 $300.00 $112.50 $225.00 33% EDGE Digital Signage Training hourly System Core and Infrastructure Solution 111111111111111111 153932 Quote #153932 5/22/2019 Display Monitors Mounting Hardware Display Monitors Display Monitors Mounting Hardware 1 of 3 #TIERNEY 1771 Energy Park Drive, Suite 100, St. Paul, MN 55108 (612) 331-5500 1 (800) 933-7337 1 Fax (612) 331-3424 www.tierneybrothers.com 1 MHD18G-3PROBLK Comprehensi $12.96 Micro Flex Pro AWIT Certified 41<60 18G High ve Speed HDMI Cable with ProGripjet Black 3ft $12.96 $11.57 $11.57 12% 1 Minnesota State Contract -Associated $350.00 $350.00 Hardware 2 Minnesota State Contract - Design / $120.00 $240.00 Engineering Professional/Technical Design Service; Engineering and Design 2 Minnesota State Contract- Project $90.00 Management 2 Minnesota State Contract -In-House $90.00 Installation 3 Minnesota State Contract - On -Site $90.00 Installation $180.00 $180.00 $270.00 1 Minnesota State Contract - Maintenance / $299.00 $299.00 Service (1 Year) Maintenance / Service; One Year Installation warranty If tax has not been included on this proposal, pricing does not include Minnesota General Sales Tax under Minnesota Statues Chapter 297A Section 70 "Exemptions for Governments and Nonprofit Groups." Please inform us if this project will be used for taxable purposes. If tax has been included on this proposal, we do not have a tax exempt form on file for your account. Please provide a completed Form ST3, Certificate of Exemption if applicable. Subtotal Tax (0%) Shipping Cost Total 1111111111111111111 153932 Quote #153932 5/22/2019 Cabling $2,698.63 $0.00 $169.51 $2,868.14 2 of 3 #TIERNEY Quote #153932 1771 Energy Park Drive, Suite 100, St. Paul, MN 55108 (612) 331-5500 1 (800) 933-7337 Fax (612) 331-3424 5/22/2019 www.tierneybrothers.com To accept this quotation, sign here Please reference this quote number on your purchase order. Please inspect product upon delivery. State of Minnesota Contract Return Policy will apply. Standard Times for Delivery from Receipt of PO*: • Stocked Product Equipment Only Sales - Three to Five Business Days • Non-Stocked Product Equipment Only Sales - Ten to 14 Business Days • Integration Projects - Two to Eight Weeks *All days include time in transit and assume product is not on back order with the manufacturer. IIIIIIIIII111111111 3of3 153932 #TIERNEY 1771 Energy Park Drive, Suite 100, St. Paul, MN 55108 (612) 331-5500 1 (800) 933-7337 1 Fax (612) 331-3424 www.tierneybrothers.com Bill To City of Monticello PO Box 1147 505 Walnut St, Suite 1 Monticello MN 55362 Memo: J - Station Audio R1 8/20/2019 592 Mike Chapley Ship To City of Monticello 505 Walnut St Monticello MN 55362 MNS-CPV 152129 IIIIIII II IIIIIIII 153934 Quote #153934 5/22/2019 Control Systems Audio Products Audio Products Audio Products Cabling Cabling 1 of 2 J - Station Audio R1 Audio Solution 7 AT1001) Atlas Sound $24.79 $173.53 $22.14 $154.98 12% Speaker Attenuator, 100w 70v, White / Ivory 1 AMP -8075 Crestron $1,792.00 $1,792.00 $1,600.00 $1,600.00 12% Avia- 8 -Channel Power Amplifier, 75W/Ch., 4/8 Ohm or 70V, North America & Japan, 100-120V Owner Furnished Product - Audio Paging Source 4 Integration Item Quam $75.20 $300.79 $67.14 $268.56 12% QH16T Compression Type, Double Re -Entrant Horn Loudspeaker with an Integrated 16W -25/70V Transformer 9 TBISOLUTION-1 Quam $69.82 $628.38 $62.34 $561.06 12% Ceiling Mounted Speaker System - C10X/BU/WS, ERD8U, SSB -3 - SOLD IN PAIRS ONLY System Core and Infrastructure Solution 1 MHD18G-91PROBLK Comprehensi $23.18 $23.18 $20.70 $20.70 12% MicroFlex Pro AWIT Certified 41<60 18G HIggh ve Speed HDMI Cable with ProGrip Jet Black 9ft 500 18-2C-P-BLK Liberty $0.13 $67.20 $0.12 $60.00 12% 18/02C STR BC CL3P Plenum Control Cable Black 1 Minnesota State Contract - Associated $500.00 $500.00 Hardware 3 Minnesota State Contract - Design / $120.00 $360.00 Engineering Professional/Technical Design Service; Engineering and Design IIIIIII II IIIIIIII 153934 Quote #153934 5/22/2019 Control Systems Audio Products Audio Products Audio Products Cabling Cabling 1 of 2 #TIERNEY Quote #153934 1771 Energy Park Drive, Suite 100, St. Paul, MN 55108 (612) 331-5500 1 (800) 933-7337 1 Fax (612) 331-3424 5/22/2019 www.tierneybrothers.com Qty Item MFG Price Ext. Price Cost Ext Cost Markup % Category 6 Minnesota State Contract - Project $90.00 $540.00 Management 2 Minnesota State Contract -In-House $90.00 $180.00 Installation 40 Minnesota State Contract - On -Site $90.00 $3,600.00 Installation 1 Minnesota State Contract - Maintenance / $599.00 $599.00 Service (1 Year) Maintenance / Service; One Year Installation warranty If tax has not been included on this proposal, pricing does not include Minnesota General Sales Tax under Minnesota Statues Chapter 297A Section 70 "Exemptions for Governments and Nonprofit Groups." Please inform us if this project will be used for taxable purposes. If tax has been included on this proposal, we do not have a tax exempt form on file for your account. Please provide a completed Form ST3, Certificate of Exemption if applicable. Subtotal $8,764.08 Tax (0%) $0.00 Shipping Cost $122.86 Total $8,886.94 To accept this quotation, sign here : Please reference this quote number on your purchase order. Please inspect product upon delivery. State of Minnesota Contract Return Policy will apply. Standard Times for Delivery from Receipt of PO*: • Stocked Product Equipment Only Sales - Three to Five Business Days • Non -Stocked Product Equipment Only Sales - Ten to 14 Business Days • Integration Projects - Two to Eight Weeks *All days include time in transit and assume product is not on back order with the manufacturer. IIIIIIII I I II I III III 2 oft 153934 11IMM' #TIERNEY 1771 Energy Park Dr. #100. St. Paul, MN 55108 800.933.73371 infoptierneybroscom Responsibilities and Conditions Client Responsibilities Tierney Brothers Responsibilities (Upon Authorization) Contract a licensed electrician to provide high voltage power Proceed with ordering the specified equipment and preparing a schedule connections. The system design will determine if optimum placement of for completion of the proposed services. outlets is best achieved before or after the installation of the AV equipment. The assigned Project Manager will communicate the specific Conduct pre -installation site visit (if necessary) involving the main site to you during the project planning. Tierney Brothers recommends that contact, site facilities representatives and a Tierney Brothers' project each projector, TV, plasma, LCD, etc. have a dedicated quad electrical manager or a qualified alternate. outlet. Provide Tierney Brothers with any existing system design specifications, diagrams, room drawings or other materials that would facilitate completion of the proposed Scope of Integration Services. All necessary ceiling tile work involved in the installation, unless an alternative has been indicated in the Scope of Integration Services in this proposal. Prepare, replace, repair or modify any structural or cosmetic changes that Tierney Brothers has made or needs to make. This includes, but is not limited to, ceiling grids, floor tiles, walls and pre-existing equipment. This does not include repair for accidental damage caused by Tierney Brothers. Confirm area is ready for installation when scheduled. This includes but is not limited to the room being vacated, physical conditions confirmed and owner furnished equipment (OFE) available. If the area is not prepared for installation when scheduled or the client has not notified Tierney Brothers five business days in advance of any schedule change or installation cancellation, there will be a $350.00 charge. Rescheduling of the installation will be set for a later date as determined by Tierney Brothers. TBI will not be responsible for the condition and functionality of any existing OFE during the installation process. This includes de -install and reinstall of OFE. Should existing equipment fail or not work properly with our system design, the customer will have the option of sourcing a TBI approved replacement part or TBI will offer a billable replacement alternative. If OFE malfunction causes delays in the installation timeframe, additional billable labor charges may apply. Clients purchasing SMART product are responsible for loading all SMART software on the applicable computers and connection of these computers to the SMARTboard prior to any scheduled training sessions. Complete Customer Configuration Worksheets as requested by Tierney Brothers within five business days. This information is required to properly integrate the new equipment with your existing IT infrastructure. TBI requires access to customer's computer and network at the time of installation to be able to complete installation and testing of the designed system. Return visits to test equipment and functionality may result in additional charges. TBI's initial estimates assume all work may be completed using standard ladders. If a lift is required, additional charges will be incurred and presented as part of a change request. For U of M Installations only: University of Minnesota customers are responsible for contacting their Facilities Management Department to coordinate conduit installation for all A/V wire and cable installations. Review scope, terms and conditions of the installation with the client at the pre -installation site visit. This will include, but is not limited to electrical, construction and cosmetic responsibilities. Basic system training, separate from Professional Development, is included in this proposal. This training will be scheduled and completed by a Tierney Brothers' representative at the end of the project installation. If Professional Development is part of this proposal, sessions must be scheduled within six months of install completion. Clients purchasing SMARTboards: After the installation of the SMARTboard is complete, the SMARTboard USB connection will be tested using the Tierney Brothers installer's laptop. After system functionality is confirmed, the USB connection will be hooked into the client's computer if it is present in the space. For safety reasons, Tierney Brothers will not modify/cut the trays on existing white boards or chalk boards. A solution for mounting over the existing board will be proposed. Any modifications to the existing board would need to be made by the customer prior to the arrival for Tierney Brothers' installation personnel Scheduling Installations are typically scheduled six to eight weeks from receipt of the customer's purchase order. Custom ordered product may increase the time needed to complete the proposed services. Standard service and support is limited to Monday through Friday, 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM central standard time, excluding national holidays. Expanded service hours may be available for an additional charge if determined necessary. This schedule assumes no delays or obstacles will be encountered in gaining access for the installation. Site Conditions Tierney Brothers cannot enter into work in or otherwise disturb any areas containing asbestos. Tierney Brothers recommends that each Projector, TV, Plasma, LCD, etc. have a duplex receptacle fed off of a dedicated 20 amp circuit available for use. Systems containing multiple racks of amplifiers or other equipment may require additional circuits. Please initial to acknowledge and authorize the Responsibilities and Conditions presented here. Proposal Terms Accounting Terms For installations scheduled to take 30 days or less from the first day on site to the last, Tierney Brothers will invoice the total project in full upon substantial completion. Tierney Brothers reserves the right to bill progressively for installations which are scheduled to take more than 30 days on site. The balance is due Net 30 days from the installation completion date, with 2% interest added to unpaid balance. Sales Taxes All applicable sales tax amounts will be charged on the sale of goods or services according to each governing law and remitted to the proper taxing authority. If your organization is tax exempt, please complete an exemption certificate and return to Tierney Brothers. Proposal Changes If additional products or services are requested prior to receipt of your signed purchase order or quote proposal, Tierney Brothers will provide an updated quote proposal, including a revised scope. If additional products or services are requested after receipt of your signed purchase order or quote proposal, Tierney Brothers will provide a change request quote with the requested equipment and scope to detail the requested changes for your approval. Upon receipt of your signed purchase order or quote proposal, Tierney Brothers will proceed with the authorized services and invoice in accordance with the purchase order or quote proposal. Verbal agreements will not be processed until confirmation, in writing, has been received. There may be a 20% to 30% restocking fee plus freight charges for those items ordered which have to be returned to the manufacturer due to customer request or by change of order. Custom order products and certain product lines not typically carried by Tierney Brothers may not be returned. AVTIERNEY 1771 Energy Park Dr. #100, St. Paul, MN 55108 800.933.7337 1 infoCdberneybros.com Other Terms Installation Warranty See specific warranty coverage program outlined in this proposal. Repair or replacement service for TBI installed consumer grade monitors/displays are subject to manufacturer warranty and service. TBI does offer de-install/re-install assistance for vendor warranty repair or replacement at an additional charge. Programming Warranty The programming warranty is 90 days, starting at the commission of the system. Changes or fixes to the system after this time will be billable at our standard service call rates." Labor Classifications and Assumptions Unless mutually agreed upon in writing prior to executing this agreement, it is the understanding of both parties that Union and/or Prevailing Wage regulations, specifically those contained in 40 U.S.C. 276a-5, or MN Stat § 177.41-177.44, do not apply to the work to be performed under this contract. Unless travel charges are specified, this proposal assumes Tierney Brothers, Inc. has local certified, licensed and insured technicians available to complete the integration services. In the event, the job site is located in a geographical area where this does not apply or a specific installation time is requested for which this personnel is not available, additional charges may apply. All hours for installation are assumed to be between 8am and 5pm (normal business hours) unless specified in this proposal. Request for work outside of normal business hours will be subject to the following increased hourly labor rates: - Second Shift (3:00pm to 10:00pm) will be billed at one and a half times our standard labor rate. - Weekend or Holiday hours will be billed at two times our standard labor rate. Requests for installations outside our normal business hours are subject to approval by the Director of Post Sales Integration. NOTICE CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION - The information in this proposal is proprietary and strictly confidential. It is intended solely for the use of the named parties. If the reader of this proposal is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution, copying or other use of the information contained in this document is strictly prohibited. If this has been received in error, please notify the responsible party immediately and then delete this proposal from all data storage devices and destroy all hard copies. Video recording of a Tierney Brothers SMART Certified Trainer or Professional Development session, and copying or distribution of any printed material supplied by Tierney Brothers Inc., is protected content under copyright licensing and can be used only with express permission from Tierney Brothers, Inc. Any video or digital content created during a training session can be used only within the organization paying for such services and cannot be shared online or distributed in any manner. This quotation is ua/id for a period of 90 days Please initial to acknowledge and authorize the Proposal Terms presented here. 1110MM' §TIERNEY 1771 Energy Park Dr. 4100, St, Paul, MN 55108 800.933.73371 infoCatierneyhros.com Tierney Brothers Premium Warranty Program Designed for: City Of Monticello Terms and Conditions Tierney Brothers, Inc. warrants the installation you have purchased from Tierney Brothers, Inc. from defects in materials and workmanship, under normal use, during the One Year Premium Warranty period. Normal use is defined as operating the system within its designed specifications. Included in the One Year Premium Warranty the customer will receive: • Unlimited Phone Support • On-site service • Discounts on Lamps and Accessories • Preventative Maintenance Check Preventative Maintenance Check will be completed toward the end of the one year warranty period. The warranty period commences on the date of customer signoff, at the completion of the install by Tierney Brothers, Inc. During the warranty period, Tierney Brothers, Inc. will first work to resolve any problems by troubleshooting over the phone. If Tierney Brothers, Inc. Support Specialists determine that the issue cannot be resolved over the phone, a Technician will be dispatched to your location(s) within 24 hours (if necessary) of the original call (Monday through Friday 8:00am — 5:00pm, excluding national holidays). Customers outside of a 150 mile radius of Tierney Brothers, Inc. are subject to mileage and trip charges. If service is required after the One Year Premium Warranty period has expired, the customer will be billed at Tierney Brothers, Inc. current labor rates. If the customer has purchased a Tierney Brothers, Inc. Extended Maintenance Agreement, that will commence at the end of the One Year Premium Warranty. If you would like additional information regarding Tierney Brothers, Inc. Extended Maintenance Agreements, please contact your Tierney Brothers, Inc. Sales Representative at 612-331-5500. Obtaining Warranty Service To obtain warranty service, please use your custom support portal (support.tierneybrothers.com) and contact us via chat, phone, or email: httDs://suoDort.tiernevbrothers.com/ Click here for a short video explaining how to log in to your support portal your first time: httD: //content.i W DIatform.com/Diavers/TDGSX21s-ka M9a lGa. html If you have any questions, please email suDoortetiernevbrothers.com or call us at 800-933-7337. You can also call our advanced support line, 855-612-7762. Obtaining Your Preventative Maintenance Check Tierney Brothers, Inc. will send out an email 60 days prior to one year warranty expiration requesting the customer go to to www.tiernevbrothers.com to schedule their preventative maintenance check. Customers can also call into our our Support Specialist at 612-331-5500 or by email at techservice@tierneybrothers.com to schedule a Preventative Maintenance Check. Customer may call to schedule Preventative Maintenance Check prior to the 60 day period if they require it done at an earlier date. Preventative Maintenance Checks are done Monday through Friday 8:00am — 5:00pm. Customer is responsible for providing access for up to 2 hours per room for Preventative Maintenance Check. If Customer doesn't schedule their preventative maintenance check before one year warranty has expired, the Preventative Maintenance Check will be void. Limitations of coverage The following items are excluded from coverage under the warranty. a. Equipment that has been removed or reinstalled in a different location b. Damage or other equipment failure due to causes beyond our control including, but not limited to, operator negligence, the failure to maintain the equipment according to the owner's manual instructions, abuse, vandalism, theft, fire, flood, wind, freezing, power failure, inadequate power supply, acts of war or acts of God. c. Any utilization of equipment that is inconsistent with either the design of the equipment or the way the manufacturer intended the equipment to be used. d. Premium Warranty covers all hardware related failures. Network or software related failures are not covered under Tierney Brothers, Inc. Premium Warranty. 1110MM' 9TIERNEY 1771 Energy Park Dr. 4100, St, Paul, MN 55108 800.933.73371 infoCatierneyhros.com Tierney Brothers Premium Warranty Program Designed for: City Of Monticello e. Operational or mechanical failure which is not reported prior to expiration of this contract. f. Equipment where the serial plate attached to the equipment is removed, defaced or made illegible. g. Damage resulting from unauthorized repair, software virus, improper electrical wiring and connections. h. Existing Owner Furnished equipment. i. Lift and Scaffolding rental is not included. This maintenance contract refers to: New Fire Station 20776 R1 I have read, understand and agree to the above terms and conditions per the plan elected. Authorized Signature: Date: City Of Monticello New Fire Station 20776 R1 ONTIERNEY 1771 Energy Park Dr. #100, St. Paul, MN 55108 800.933.7337 1 info@tierneybros.com Proposal Summary Please Check the Quotes Intended for Purchase Order A - Room 141 EOC/Trainina R1 State Contract Total: $ 49,278.46 Non Contract Total: $ - Proposal Total: $ 49,278.46 ❑ B - Rooms 114, 115 Fire Marshall/Fire Chief R1 State Contract Total: $ 7,987.24 Non Contract Total: $ - Proposal Total: $ 7,987.24 ❑ C - Rooms 110. 111, 112, 113 R1 State Contract Total: $ 9,143.54 Non Contract Total: $ - Proposal Total: $ 9,143.54 ❑ D - Room 116; Conference Room RI State Contract Total: $ 8,328.67 Non Contract Total: $ - Proposal Total: $ 8,328.67 ❑ E - Room 108; Dav Room RI State Contract Total: $ 5,884.07 Non Contract Total: $ - Proposal Total: $ 5,884.07 ❑ F - Room 138; Fitness R1 State Contract Total: $ 3,766.37 Non Contract Total: $ - Proposal Total: $ 3,766.37 ❑ G - Room 123 Gear/Grid R1 State Contract Total: $ 2,756.79 Non Contract Total: $ - Proposal Total: $ 2,756.79 ❑ H - Room 135; Comm/Disoatch R1 State Contract Total: $ 3,106.47 Non Contract Total: $ - Proposal Total: $ 3,106.47 ❑ I - Room 142; History DisDlav R1 State Contract Total: $ 2,868.14 Non Contract Total: $ - Proposal Total: $ 2,868.14 ❑ PASTE OUOTE DESCRIPTION HERE State Contract Total: $ 8,886.94 Non Contract Total: $ - Proposal Total: $ 8,886.94 ❑ Project Total: $ 102,006.69 Council Agenda: 05/28/2019 4A. Consideration of accepting the 2018 Audit Report (WO) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: A transparent organization trusted with properly managing public dollars, the city of Monticello and all Minnesota cities are statutorily required to have a private third parry conduct an annual audit of its financial statements. For the eighth year, Malloy, Montague, Karnowski, Radosevich & Co., P.A. (MMKR) conducted the city's audit. All Finance Department personnel contributed to audit process, with the finance manager providing a substantial and critical role. The city's 2017 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) received the Government Finance Officers Association's (GFOA) Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting. This is the eighth time the city has received the award, but the fourth time staff prepared the report. The 2018 CAFR was prepared and will be submitted by staff to the GFOA for grading and comment. Finally, the CAFR format allows credit rating firms to compare the city's financial position with other cities. Such comparison could lead to a better bond rating. Jim Eichten, Principal of MMKR, will present a summary of their findings and summarize the highlights of the city's 2018 CAFR. Information presented at the workshop and council meeting will be available online at the citv's website under citv services — finance. No extra copies will be available for distribution. Al. Budget Impact: Acceptance of the audit report results in no costs. A2. Staff Workload Impact: Prepare agenda item and post to website. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: Motion to accept the 2018 Audit Report. 2. Motion to not accept the 2018 Audit Report at this time. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff supports Alternative #1. The finance director would like to thank all city and departmental staff for their participation in the audit process, adherence to procedures/policies/statutes, and contribution to the final product. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. 2018 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report B. 2018 Special Purpose Audit Report C. 2018 Management Report . lvw.. V Fa r UN lit C IF Aw. IK; 4 it 4 LILAIJ. 41 Aft 70 VL Ld( V �q P, JL jL CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA Co'mprehensive Annual Financial Report FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018 City of Monticello Wright County, Minnesota COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018 Prepared by THE "FINANCE TEAM" Julie Cheney, Finance Assistant Debbie Davidson, Finance Clerk Sarah Rathlisberger, Finance Manager RaeLynn Cook, Payroll -Finance Clerk Pat Kovich, Utility Billing Specialist Wayne W. Oberg, Finance Director CITY OF MONTICELLO Comprehensive Annual Financial Report Table of Contents December 31, 2018 INTRODUCTORY SECTION Page Letter of Transmittal 1 GFOA Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting 4 Organization Chart 5 Directory of Officials 6 FINANCIAL SECTION Independent Auditor's Report 7 Management's Discussion and Analysis 9 Basic Financial Statements Government -wide Financial Statements Statement of Net Position 19 Statement of Activities 21 Fund Financial Statements Balance Sheet - Governmental Funds 22 Reconciliation of the Governmental Funds Balance Sheet to the Statement of Net Position 23 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Governmental Funds 24 Reconciliation of the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds to the Statement of Activities 25 Statement of Net Position - Proprietary Funds 26 Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Net Position - Proprietary Funds 29 Statement of Cash Flows - Proprietary Funds 30 Notes to the Financial Statements 32 Required Supplementary Information Schedule of Employer's Share and Non -Employer Proportionate Share of Net Pension Liability - Public Employees Retirement Association 58 Schedule of Employer's Pension Contibutions - Public Employees Retirement Association 59 Schedule of Changes in the Fire Relief Association's Net Pension Liability (Asset) and Related Ratios 60 Schedule of Employer's Pension Contributions - Monticello Fire Department Relief Association 61 Schedule of Changes in the City's Total OPEB Liability and Related Ratios 62 Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual - General Fund 64 Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual - Community Center Fund 66 Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual - Economic Development Authority Fund 67 Notes to the Required Supplementry Information 68 Combining and Individual Fund Financial Statements and Schedules Nonmajor Governmental Funds Combining Balance Sheet 69 Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance 70 (continued) CITY OF MONTICELLO Comprehensive Annual Financial Report Table of Contents December 31, 2018 (continued) Internal Service Funds Page Combining Statement of Net Position 71 Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Net Position 72 Combining Statement of Cash Flows 73 Other Supplementry Schedules Schedule of Revenues (Sources) and Expenditures (Uses) - General Fund 75 Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual - Minnesota Investment Fund 79 Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual - Cemetery Fund 80 Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual - CDBG-Revitalization Fund 81 Schedule of Assets, Liabilities, Deferred Inflows of Resources and Fund Balances - Economic Development Authority 82 Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Other Financing Sources (Uses) - Economic Development Authority 84 Schedule of Assets, Liabilities, Deferred Inflows of Resources and Fund Balances - Debt Service Activities 86 Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Other Financing Sources (Uses) - Debt Service Activities 87 STATISTICAL SECTION Financial trends Net Position by Component - Last Ten Fiscal Years 89 Changes in Net Position - Last Ten Fiscal years 90 General Governmental Tax Revenues by Source - Last Ten Fiscal Years 92 Fund Balances of Governmental Funds - Last Ten Fiscal Years 93 Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds - Last Ten Fiscal Years 94 Governmental Funds Tax Revenues by Source - Last Ten Fiscal Years 95 Revenue capacity Tax Capacity Value and Estimated Market Value of Taxable Property - Last Ten Fiscal Years 96 Property Tax Rates - All Direct and Overlapping Governments - Last Ten Fiscal Years 97 Property Tax Levies and Collections - Last Ten Fiscal Years 98 Principal Property Taxpayers - Current Year and Nine Years Ago 99 New Construction and Bank Deposits - Last Ten Fiscal Years 100 Water Sold by Customer Type (gallons) - Last Ten Fiscal Years 101 Water and Sewage Utility Rates - Last Ten Fiscal Years 102 Debt capacity Ratios of Outstanding Debt by Type - Last Ten Fiscal Years 103 Ratios of Net General Obligation Bonded Debt Outstanding - Last Ten Fiscal Years 104 Legal Debt Margin Information - Last Ten Fiscal Years 105 Computation of Direct and Overlapping Debt - As of December 31, 2018 106 Schedule of General Obligation Revenue Bond Coverage - Last Ten Fiscal Years 107 Economic and demographic information Demographic and Economic Statistics - Last Ten Fiscal Years 108 Principal Employers - Current Year and Nine Years Ago 109 Operating information City Government Employees by Function/Program - Last Ten Fiscal Years 110 Operating Indicators by Function - Last Ten Fiscal Years 111 Capital Assets Statistics by Function - Last Ten Fiscal Years 113 Schedule of Cash Flows Adjusted for Additional City Funding of Fiber Optics Fund -Last Four Fiscal Years 114 !ro'i� ,PIP ♦ JOAN INTRODUCTORY SECTION L �4 7TT�e F Letter of Transmittal CITY OP Monticello Finance Department May 22, 2019 To the Honorable Mayor, Members of the City Council, and the Citizens of the City of Monticello: We are pleased to present the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) of the City of Monticello, Minnesota (the city) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018. Responsibility for both the accuracy of the data and the completeness and fairness of the presentation, including all disclosures, rests with the city. To the best of our knowledge and belief, the enclosed data is accurate, in all material respects, and is reported in a manner designed to present fairly the financial position and results of operations of the various funds of the city. All disclosures necessary to enable the reader to gain an understanding of the city's financial activities have been included. Management assumes full responsibility for the completeness and reliability of the information contained in this report, based upon a comprehensive framework of internal control that it has established for this purpose. Because the cost of internal control should not exceed anticipated benefits, the objective is to provide reasonable, rather than absolute, assurance that the financial statements are free of any material misstatements. The city's financial statements have been audited by Malloy, Montague, Karnowski, Radosevich & Co., P.A. (MMKR), a firm of licensed certified public accountants. The goal of the independent audit is to provide reasonable assurance that the financial statements of the city for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 are free of material misstatements. The independent audit involved examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. The independent auditor concluded, based upon the audit, that there was a reasonable basis for rendering an CITY OF MONTICELLO unmodified opinion that the city's financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018, are fairly presented in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The independent auditor's report is presented as the first component of the financial section of this report. The preparation of this CAFR is a requirement of state law. Also, the CAFR is required by the bond rating agencies before they will rate the city's bonds. The report can be used by the city council and the citizens of the city to gain a better understanding of the financial condition of the city. Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that management provide a narrative introduction, overview, and analysis to accompany the basic financial statements in the form of Management's Discussion and Analysis (MD&A). This letter of transmittal is designed to complement the MD&A and should be read in conjunction with it. The city's MD&A can be found immediately following the report of the auditors. PROFILE OF THE CITY The city is situated in a prime location on Interstate 94 between the cities of Minneapolis/St. Paul and St. Cloud. The city has experienced remarkable growth within the last 15 years in the residential, commercial, office, and retail sectors. The city is a freestanding urban fringe community encompassing approximately 5,000 acres and a population of 13,553. The city is home to one of Minnesota's two nuclear power plants, both owned by Xcel Energy, Inc. (NYSE: XEL). With a small carbon footprint, the Xcel plant is also the city's largest employer and property taxpayer. Additionally, Monticello's business friendly environment provides a home for Cargill Kitchen Solutions. The privately -owned, agri-giant is the city's largest customer of water and sewage utility services. The city was founded by second -generation Americans who migrated west in the mid -1800s. Early settlers found the gently sloping banks and shallow levels of the Mississippi River made a logical place for a river crossing. Incorporated in 1856, the city grew quickly during the early settlement years and then leveled to a population of about 1,300. It was this original settlement that became the core city and survives today as downtown Monticello. The city is categorized as a 501(a) entity by IRS Code and operates under the "Optional Plan A" form of government as defined in Minnesota Statutes. Under this plan, the government of the city is directed by a city council composed of an elected mayor and four elected city council members. The city council exercises legislative authority and determines all matters of policy. The city council appoints personnel responsible for the proper administration of all Letter of Transmittal affairs relating to the city. Council members serve four-year terms, with two members elected every two years. The mayor is elected for a two-year term. The mayor and members of the city council are elected at large. The city provides a full range of services: the construction and maintenance of streets and other infrastructure; snow removal; park and cemetery maintenance; recreational and cultural activities; water, sewer, surface water, residential garbage, and recycling systems; community development, building inspection, planning, police, fire, liquor store, and deputy registrar operations; a city -run fiber optic system and community center; and general government operations, including administration, finance/accounting, information systems, community information, and general government buildings. The city council is required to adopt a final budget by late December for the subsequent year. The budget is prepared by fund, function (e.g. public works), and department (e.g. streets and alleys). Transfers of appropriations between funds require the approval of the city council. The legal level of budgetary control is the department level in the General Fund and fund level in all other funds. Budget amendments require city council approval. FINANCIAL PLANNING AND THE LOCAL ECONOMY The city is recovering slowly from recent economic woes that have affected other communities in Wright County and throughout the state of Minnesota. The nuclear power plant provides the city with a relatively stable tax and employment base. During the economic downturn, new commercial development came to a virtual standstill and growth remains anemic today. However, the city lost very few of its local businesses, although some reduced their workforce and scaled back operations. The residential growth has slowed from a decade ago, but the city has not been hit with a large number of foreclosed homes. In the past, the state of Minnesota has reduced local government aid (LGA) and the market value homestead credit (MVHC) to cities and counties as a way to balance its own budget. Since the city does not receive LGA, the city's finances are relatively insulated from the state's budget impacts. In 2012, the state eliminated the MVHC and replaced it with a Market Value Exclusion program, which the city incorporated into its 2018 budget. The new program shifted more of the tax burden to nonresidential property taxpayers. The economy and housing market has also affected city revenues for building permits. The city issued 879 building permits in 2009 with a total valuation of $45,917,000. In 2018, the city issued 855 permits with a total valuation of $33,125,788. New residential infrastructure construction will need to occur to support the same level of residential building permits in the future. CITY OF MONTICELLO Fortunately, the city does not rely on the state as a major funding source (LGA). In addition, the city has budgeted conservatively over the years, resulting in very modest growth in the property tax levy. To assist external stakeholders, the city is exploring various ways to better represent its financial position, such as the elimination of all interfund loans/receivables in 2012. Other initiatives include consolidating funds with similar purposes, distributing unallocated expenses and aggregating similar costs for distribution as single amounts to each budget unit. Further, staff continues to refine the chart of accounts with the goal of providing better information to decision makers. MAJOR INITIATIVES The city has three major ongoing initiatives in 2018. The first ongoing initiative is the revitalization of its historic downtown. The downtown is the oldest part of the city, and many buildings are in need of maintenance or demolition. In addition, the amount of traffic on State Highway 25 and County Road 75 makes both vehicle and pedestrian traffic difficult to move from one area of the downtown to another. Because of these issues, a number of the store fronts are unoccupied. To address these issues, the city completed an Embracing Downtown Monticello initiative with the goal to identify needed improvements and enhancements, which will once again make the downtown area a vibrant shopping and resident destination. This initiative was 2 Letter of Transmittal supplemented with a 2017 Downtown Small Area Plan. A number of property acquisitions took place in 2018 to support this initiative. The challenge moving forward will be the implementation of the plan and creating development opportunities within the downtown area for new and existing businesses. The second ongoing initiative is the joint operation with Wright County of Bertram Chain of Lakes properties. The city and Wright County completed the final land purchases in 2016. This 1,258 -acre site includes four pristine lakes and woodlands, which, when developed, will become a regional park. Wright County and the city obtained matching grants from the state to purchase much of the acreage in the park. Planning and design took place in 2018 in order to begin phase 1 of park improvements in 2019. Finally, a pending Trunk Highway Transportation study will provide context for the last major initiative of improving regional transportation corridors. The city is part of a joint powers agreement, which also includes the cities of Becker and Big Lake, the counties of Wright and Sherburne, Becker and Big Lake Townships, and MnDot (Minnesota Department of Transportation) District 3. INTERNAL CONTROL The management of the city is responsible for establishing and maintaining a system of internal controls designed to ensure that the assets of the city are protected from loss, theft, or misuse and that adequate accounting data is compiled to allow for the preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The city's internal controls are designed to provide reasonable, but not absolute assurance that these objectives are met. The concept of reasonable assurance recognizes that: 1) the cost of a control should not exceed the benefits likely to be derived, and 2) the valuation of cost and benefit requires estimates and judgments by management. The city's internal controls are subject to periodic evaluation by management and the finance department staff of the city. BUDGETING CONTROLS In addition, the city maintains budgetary controls. The objective of these budgetary controls is to assure compliance with legal provisions embodied in the annual appropriated budget approved by the city council. Activities of the General Fund are included in the annual appropriated budget. The level of budgetary control (that is, the level at which expenditures cannot legally exceed the appropriated amount) is established by department within the General Fund. The city council also adopts a five-year Capital Improvement Program as a financial planning document for major purchases. As demonstrated by the statements and schedules included in the financial CITY OF MONTICELLO section of this report, the city continues to meet its responsibility for sound financial management. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada (GFOA) awarded a Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting to the city for its CAFR for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017. This was the ninth year that the city has achieved this prestigious award. In order to be awarded a Certificate of Achievement, the city had to publish an easily readable and efficiently organized CAFR. This report must satisfy both accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and applicable legal requirements. A Certificate of Achievement is valid for a period of one year only. We believe that our current CAFR continues to meet the Certificate of Achievement Program's requirements, and we are submitting it to the GFOA to determine its eligibility for the award. The 2018 CAFR meets the highest professional standards and was prepared in a timely and cost-effective manner. The preparation of this report would not have been possible without the efficient and dedicated service of the entire staff of the finance department and through the helpful guidance and assistance from our auditing firm, MMKR. We wish to express our appreciation to all members of the department who assisted and contributed to the preparation of this report. Credit also must be given to the mayor and city council for their unfailing support for maintaining the highest standards of professionalism in the management of the city's finances. Respectfully submitted, 4)_ a 0��L_ so"kL 4au"7 Wayne W. Oberg, MBA, CPA Sarah K. Rathlisberger Finance Director Finance Manager Certificate of Achievement G� Government Finance Officers Association Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting Presented to City of Monticello Minnesota For its Comprehensive Annual Financial Report For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2017 'G u P 2r. u Executive Director CITY OF MONTICELLO The Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada (GFOA) awarded a Certificate for Excellence in Financial Reporting to the City of Monticello, Minnesota for its Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017. The Certificate of Achievement is a prestigious national award recognizing conformance with the highest standards for preparation of state and local government reports. In order to be awarded a Certificate of Achievement, a governmental unit must publish an easily readable and efficiently organized Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, whose contents conform to program standards. Such reports must satisfy both generally accepted accounting principles and applicable legal requirements. A Certificate of Achievement is valid for a period of one year only. We believe our current report continues to conform to Certificate of Achievement program requirements, and we are submitting it to the GFOA. 4 Organization Chart Citizens of Monticello 1 City Commissions Council &Boards 1 City lAdministratol CITY OF MONTICELLO HumanFinance Community City Public Community City Fire Contracted Resource Director Development Engineer Works Center Clerk Chief Services Manager Director Director Director Finance Economic I Construction I Streets Community Elections Fire City Department Development Inspectors Department Center Department Attorney Audit Building Consulting Parks Sheriff Inspections Engineer Department Department Deputy Receptionist Water& Animal Registrar Sewage Control Department Liquor Consulting Refuse County Operations Planner Collection Assessor FiberNet Operation Directory of Officials MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL CITY STAFF Position Name Mayor..................................................................................... Brian Stumpf Council.................................................................................. Jim Davidson Council............................................................................................ Bill Fair Council..............................................................................Charlotte Gabler Council.................................................................................... Lloyd Hilgart City Administrator.......................................................................Jeff O'Neill Public Works Director/City Engineer......................................Matt Leonard Finance Director.................................................................... Wayne Oberg Community Development Director.................................Angela Schumann Community Center Director .................................................... Ann Mosack Economic Development Manager ............................................. Jim Thares City Clerk........................................................................Jennifer Schreiber Human Resource Manager ..................................................... Tracy Ergen Chief Building Official .................................................. Ron Hackenmueller Fire Chief................................................................................ Mike Mossey Deputy Registrar Manager ............................................... Carolyn Granger Liquor Store Manager ...................................................... Randall Johnsen Finance Manager ........................................................Sarah Rathlisberger Street Superintendent.............................................................Tom Moores Parks Superintendent............................................................. Tom Pawelk Water & Sewage Superintendent ................................................Mat Stang Communications Coordinator ............................................Rachel Leonard PROFESSIONAL SERVICES City Attorney..........................................................Campbell Knutson, P.A. City Engineer................................................................. WSB & Associates Law Enforcement.........................................Wright County Sheriff's Office Financial Advisor ..................................................Northland Securities, Inc Fibernet Management Services.........................................................Arvig Term Expires 12/31/2020 12/31/2020 12/31/2020 12/31/2022 12/31/2022 CITY OF MONTICELLO 0 # 4 r F 7i Y!,�.�'�y� , '� X47 iti4�'Y�• •� J�[� Sjp•� �.T t FINANCIAL SECTION L �4 7TT�e r CERTIFIED A C C O U N" INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT To the City Council and Management City of Monticello, Minnesota REPORT ON THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS We have audited the accompanying financial statements of the governmental activities, the business -type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City of Monticello, Minnesota (the City) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2018, and the related notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the City's basic financial statements as listed in the table of contents. MANAGEMENT'S RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America; this includes the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. AUDITOR'S RESPONSIBILITY Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards Principals Thomas M. Montague, CPA Thomas A. Karnowski, CPA Paul A. Radosevich, CPA William J. Lauer, CPA James H. Eichten, CPA Aaron J. Nielsen, CPA Victoria L. Holinka, CPA Jaclyn M. Huegel, CPA require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement. An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor's judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the City's preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the City's internal control. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinions. OPINIONS In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the respective financial position of the governmental activities, the business -type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City as of December 31, 2018, and the (continued) Malloy, Montague, Karnowski, Radosevich, & Co., P.A. 7 5353 Wayzata Boulevard • Suite 410 • Minneapolis, MN 55416 • Telephone: 952-545-0424 • Telefax: 952-545.0569 • www.mmkr.com respective changes in financial position and, where applicable, cash flows thereof, for the year then ended, in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. EMPHASIS OF MATTER As described in Note 14 of the notes to basic financial statements, the City has implemented Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement No. 75, Accounting and Financial Reporting for Postemployment Benefits Other Than Pensions, during the year ended December 31, 2018. Our opinion is not modified with respect to this matter. OTHER MATTERS Required Supplementary Information Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that the management's discussion and analysis and the required supplementary information (RSI), as listed in the table of contents, be presented to supplement the basic financial statements. Such information, although not a part of the basic financial statements, is required by the GASB, who considers it to be an essential part of financial reporting for placing the basic financial statements in an appropriate operational, economic, or historical context. We have applied certain limited procedures to the RSI in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, which consisted of inquiries of management about the methods of preparing the information and comparing the information for consistency with management's responses to our inquiries, the basic financial statements, and other knowledge we obtained during our audit of the basic financial statements. We do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on the information because the limited procedures do not provide us with sufficient evidence to express an opinion or provide any assurance. Other Information Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming opinions on the financial statements that collectively comprise the City's basic financial statements. The introductory section, combining and individual fund financial statements and schedules, and statistical section, as listed in the table of contents, are presented for purposes of additional analysis and are not required parts of the basic financial statements. The combining and individual fund financial statements and schedules are the responsibility of management and were derived from and relate directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and certain additional procedures, including comparing and reconciling such information directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the basic financial statements or to the basic financial statements themselves, and other additional procedures in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. In our opinion, the information is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the basic financial statements as a whole. The introductory and statistical sections have not been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, accordingly, we do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on them. OTHER REPORTING REQUIRED BY GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS In accordance with GovernmentAuditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated May 22, 2019 on our consideration of the City's internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, grant agreements, and other matters. The purpose of that report is solely to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over financial reporting and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the effectiveness of the City's internal control over financial reporting or on compliance. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards in considering the City's internal control over financial reporting and compliance. I *Vk4J4,d,, kM4A4 WJ;', 1 Minneapolis, Minnesota May 22, 2019 0 rF-f!�4ti# •,i+',�+y��fM }' �y SII ll ' 1` ..� i� I .tit.' #��;� � •• 7i 14 r3J .� l �47 'k.. . � '14 �I'Y � 1 1 • _ �. J ^� `' r x Ir :t i aJL .4 X qk. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS SECTION 4Y� j� � � r•`7 i+f - i� ;►- .. r; � - fir. t• Management's Discussion and Analysis Management's Discussion and Analysis As management of the City of Monticello, Minnesota (the city), we offer readers of the city's financial statements this narrative overview and analysis of the financial activities of the city for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018. We encourage readers to consider the information presented here in conjunction with additional information that we have furnished in our letter of transmittal, which can be found on pages 1-3 of this report. Overview of the Basic Financial Statements The discussion and analysis are intended to serve as an introduction to the city's basic financial statements. The city's basic financial statements comprise three components: 1) government -wide financial statements, 2) fund financial statements, and 3) notes to the financial statements. This report also contains other supplementary information in addition to the basic financial statements themselves. COMPONENTS OF THE ANNUAL FINANICAL REPORT -----------------i, \ Management's Basic Required Discussion and Financial Supplementary Analysis Statements Information ------------------ Government -wide Fund Notes to the Financial Financial Statements Financial Statements Statements Summary .4 ► Detail Government -Wide Financial Statements — The government -wide financial statements are designed to provide readers with a broad overview of the city's finances, in a manner similar to private sector businesses. CITY OF MONTICELLO The Statement of Net Position presents information on all of the city's assets and deferred outflows of resources, and liabilities and deferred inflows of resources, with the difference reported as net position. Over time, increases or decreases in net position may serve as a useful indicator of whether the financial position of the city is improving or deteriorating. The Statement of Activities presents information showing how the city's net position changed during the most recent fiscal year. All changes in net position are reported as soon as the underlying event giving rise to the change occurs, regardless of the timing of related cash flows. Thus, revenues and expenses are reported in this statement for some items that will only result in cash flows in future fiscal periods (delinquent taxes and special assessments). Both of the government -wide financial statements distinguish functions of the city that are principally supported by taxes and intergovernmental revenue (governmental activities) from other functions that are intended to recover all or a significant portion of their costs through user fees and charges (business -type activities). The governmental activities provided by the city include general government, public safety, public works, sanitation, transit, recreation and culture, economic development, and interest and fiscal charges. Business -type activities include water, sewage, liquor, fiber optics, and deputy registrar enterprises. The government -wide financial statements include not only the city itself (known as the primary government), but also the Economic Development Authority (often referred to as the EDA). The EDA is a legally separate entity which functions, in essence, as a department of the city, to provide redevelopment and other economic development assistance through the administration of various programs. Therefore, the EDA has been included as an integral part of the city's financial statements. The government -wide financial statements can be found on pages 19-21 of this report. Fund Financial Statements — A fund is a grouping of related accounts that is used to maintain control over resources that have been segregated for specific activities or objectives. The city, like other state and local governments, uses fund accounting to ensure and demonstrate compliance with finance -related legal requirements. All of the city's funds can be divided into two categories: governmental funds and proprietary funds. Governmental Funds — Governmental funds are used to account for essentially the same functions reported as governmental activities in the government -wide financial statements. However, unlike the government -wide financial statements, governmental fund financial statements focus on near - M Management's Discussion and Analysis term inflows and outflows of spendable resources, as well as the balances of spendable resources available at the end of the fiscal year. Such information may be useful in evaluating a government's near-term financing requirements. Because the focus of governmental funds is narrower than that of the government -wide financial statements, it is useful to compare the information presented for governmental funds with similar information presented for governmental activities in the government -wide financial statements. By doing so, readers may better understand the long-term impact of the government's near-term financing decisions. Both the governmental funds Balance Sheet and Statement of Revenue, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances provide a reconciliation to facilitate the comparison between governmental funds and governmental activities. The city maintains several individual governmental funds. Information is presented separately in the governmental funds Balance Sheet and in the governmental funds Statement of Revenue, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances for the General Fund, Community Center (special revenue) Fund, EDA (special revenue) Fund, Debt Service Fund, and Capital Projects Fund, all of which are considered to be major funds. Data from the remaining governmental funds are combined into a single, aggregated presentation. Individual fund data for each of these nonmajor governmental funds is provided in the form of combining statements elsewhere in this report. The city adopts an annual budget for its General Fund and special revenue funds. A budgetary comparison schedule has been provided within the required supplementary information for the General Fund and major special revenue funds to demonstrate compliance with the adopted budgets. The governmental fund financial statements can be found on pages 22-25 of this report. Proprietary Funds — The city maintains two different types of proprietary funds. Enterprise funds are used to report the same functions presented as business - type activities in the government -wide financial statements. The city maintains five enterprise funds which are used to account for its water and sewage services, municipal liquor store sales, fiber optics network, and deputy registrar, which provides vehicle and other licensing services. Internal service funds are an accounting device used to accumulate and allocate costs internally among the city's various functions. The city uses internal service funds to account for benefits accruals, central equipment services, and information technology (IT) services. Because these internal service fund activities predominantly benefit governmental rather than business -type functions, they have been included within governmental activities in the government -wide financial statements. CITY OF MONTICELLO Proprietary funds provide the same type of information as the government -wide financial statements, only in more detail. The proprietary fund financial statements provide separate information for each of the enterprise operations. The internal service funds are combined into a single, aggregated presentation in the proprietary fund financial statements. Individual fund data for the internal service funds is provided in the form of combining statements elsewhere in this report. The proprietary fund financial statements can be found on pages 26-31 of this report. Notes to Basic Financial Statements — The notes to basic financial statements provide additional information that is essential to obtaining a full understanding of the data provided in the government -wide and fund financial statements. The notes to the basic financial statements can be found on pages 32-56 of this report. Other Information — In addition to the basic financial statements and accompanying notes, this report presents required supplementary information on activity related to the defined benefit pension plans and the other post - employment benefits (OPEB) plan as well as budgetary comparison information. Combining statements for nonmajor governmental funds, internal service funds, and other supplementary schedules including activities of the General, nonmajor Special Revenue, Economic Development Authority, and Debt Service funds, can also be found in the combining and individual fund statements and schedules section of this report. Required supplementary information and combining and individual fund statements and schedules can be found starting on page 58. 10 Management's Discussion and Analysis Financial Highlights The assets and deferred outflows of resources of the city exceeded its liabilities and deferred inflows of resources at year-end by $129,101,332 (net position). Of this amount, $36,684,053 (unrestricted net position) may be used to meet the city's ongoing obligations to citizens and creditors. As of the close of the current fiscal year, the city's governmental funds reported combined ending fund balances of $30,170,552, a decrease of $1,716,570, or 5.4 percent. Nonspendable, restricted, and assigned uses of fund balance totaled $23,185,724, leaving an unassigned fund balance of $6,984,828, which is $66,604, or 1.0 percent, higher than the 2017 ending unassigned balance. At the end of the current fiscal year, unassigned fund balance for the General Fund was $6,984,828, or 88 percent, of total General Fund expenditures for 2018. The city targets 75 percent of next year's expenditure budget as the optimum fund balance level, providing a reserve for cash flow during the first six months of each subsequent year until property tax receipts are released from the county treasurer's office and distributed to the local levels of government. The state auditor recommends that local governments maintain an unrestricted fund balance of approximately 35-50 percent of operating revenues or no less than five months of operating expenditures for the General Fund. The General Fund's heavy dependence on property tax revenues validates the 75 percent target. What is more, this reserve threshold provides temporary financing for unforeseen emergencies. (Source: Minnesota Office of the State Auditor: Fund Balance Reporting and Governmental Fund Type Definitions, based on Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement No. 54, 2010- 1003 Revised July 2012). In 2018, government -wide capital assets increased by $4,917,007 due to acquisitions exceeding disposals and depreciation on existing assets. Governmental activities right-of-way acquisitions and construction of the Fallon Avenue Overpass occurred in 2018. The city began the Chelsea Road Utility and Street Improvement project; utility improvements were completed in 2018, but street improvements will be completed in 2019. The city also completed the 2017 Street Reconstruction project, and constructed three park structures. Other acquisitions include a developer donation of infrastructure in the Featherstone Third addition, intersection upgrades at County Rd 39 & Gillard Avenue, fire rescue boat, water fund truck, sewer fund vactor truck, and liquor store advertising sign. Internal service funds acquisitions include a new telephone system, an upgrade in electronic document storage, one new vehicle, three new utility tractors, a street sweeper, a compaction roller, and a milling machine. CITY OF MONTICELLO The city's total long-term bonded indebtedness increased by $2,314,598, or 8.9 percent, in 2018. Principal payments made on outstanding debt totaled $2,692,149. The city issued $5,000,000 in tax abatement general obligations bonds to finance capital project costs related to the Fallon Avenue overpass and $6,747 in a Minnesota Public Facilities Authority (PFA) loan for wastewater treatment plant improvements in 2018. The 2018A general obligation bonds are accounted for in the Debt Service Fund and will be paid from special assessments and property taxes. The PFA loan is accounted for in the Sewage Fund and utility customer charges will generate the cash needed for repayment of this debt. 11 Management's Discussion and Analysis GOVERNMENT -WIDE FINANCIAL ANALYSIS NET POSITION CITY OF MONTICELLO By the far the largest portion of the city's net position (64%) reflects investment in capital assets (e.g. land, buildings, structures, systems, machinery, equipment, infrastructure, and intangible assets), net of any related debt used to acquire those assets that is still outstanding. The city uses assets to provide services to citizens; consequently, these assets are not available for future spending. Although the city's investment in capital assets is reported net of related debt, it should be noted that resources needed to repay this debt must be provided from other sources since capital assets themselves cannot be used to liquidate these liabilities. A small portion of the city's net position (7%) represents resources that are subject to external restrictions on how they can be used. The remaining unrestricted net position of $36,684,053 may be used to meet the ongoing obligations to citizens and creditors. Of the unrestricted net position, $13,261,505 (36%) is attributable to business -type activities. The unrestricted governmental activities net position increased $2,523,438 (12%), and business -type activities unrestricted net position increased $1,356,447 (11%). The government -wide total unrestricted net position increased $3,879,885 (12%), reflecting revenues exceeding conservative budgeted estimates and expenditures below liberal estimates. The $5,893,980 (10%) increase in governmental activities capital assets is reflective of capital asset purchases and reinvestment, including the Fallon Avenue overpass construction, exceeding depreciation and disposals. Business -type capital assets decreased $976,973 (2%) due to depreciation exceeding investment in improvements. Net investment in capital assets, which is capital assets less related debt, increased because capital asset acquisitions less the amount of debt borrowed to acquire assets exceeded capital asset disposals and depreciation. 12 Governmental Activities Business -Type Activities Total 2018 2017 2018 2017 2018 2017 Current and other assets $ 42,272,476 $ 39,906,104 $ 15,210,287 $ 13,398,066 $ 57,482,763 $ 53,304,170 Capital assets 67,858,760 61,964,780 43,269,721 44,246,694 111,128,481 106,211,474 Total assets 110,131,236 101,870,884 58,480,008 57,644,760 168,611,244 159,515,644 Deferred outflows of resources 559,152 665,887 148,305 233,959 707,457 899,846 Long-term liabilities 27,179,638 24,962,313 4,991,329 5,308,862 32,170,967 30,271,175 Other liabilities 1,838,470 2,023,018 896,177 456,039 2,734,647 2,479,057 Total liabilities 29,018,108 26,985,331 5,887,506 5,764,901 34,905,614 32,750,232 Deferred inflows of resources 5,082,664 1,516,742 229,091 263,963 5,311,755 1,780,705 Net position Net investment in capital assets 43,517,983 41,535,637 39,250,211 39,944,797 82,768,194 81,480,434 Restricted 9,649,085 11,599,951 - - 9,649,085 11,599,951 Unrestricted 23,422,548 20,899,110 13,261,505 11,905,058 36,684,053 32,804,168 Total net position $ 76,589,616 $ 74,034,698 $ 52,511,716 $ 51,849,855 $ 129,101,332 $ 125,884,553 By the far the largest portion of the city's net position (64%) reflects investment in capital assets (e.g. land, buildings, structures, systems, machinery, equipment, infrastructure, and intangible assets), net of any related debt used to acquire those assets that is still outstanding. The city uses assets to provide services to citizens; consequently, these assets are not available for future spending. Although the city's investment in capital assets is reported net of related debt, it should be noted that resources needed to repay this debt must be provided from other sources since capital assets themselves cannot be used to liquidate these liabilities. A small portion of the city's net position (7%) represents resources that are subject to external restrictions on how they can be used. The remaining unrestricted net position of $36,684,053 may be used to meet the ongoing obligations to citizens and creditors. Of the unrestricted net position, $13,261,505 (36%) is attributable to business -type activities. The unrestricted governmental activities net position increased $2,523,438 (12%), and business -type activities unrestricted net position increased $1,356,447 (11%). The government -wide total unrestricted net position increased $3,879,885 (12%), reflecting revenues exceeding conservative budgeted estimates and expenditures below liberal estimates. The $5,893,980 (10%) increase in governmental activities capital assets is reflective of capital asset purchases and reinvestment, including the Fallon Avenue overpass construction, exceeding depreciation and disposals. Business -type capital assets decreased $976,973 (2%) due to depreciation exceeding investment in improvements. Net investment in capital assets, which is capital assets less related debt, increased because capital asset acquisitions less the amount of debt borrowed to acquire assets exceeded capital asset disposals and depreciation. 12 Management's Discussion and Analysis Revenues Program revenues Charges for services Operating grants and contributions Capital grants and contributions General revenues Property taxes Tax increments Franchise taxes Unrestricted investment earnings Gain on sale of assets Total revenues Expenses General government Public safety Public works Sanitation Transit Recreation and culture Economic development Interest and fiscal charges Water utility Sewage utility Liquor Fiber optics Deputy registrar Total expenses Increase in net position before transfers Transfers Change in net position Net position, January 1, as previously reported Change in accounting standard (Note 14) Net position, January 1, as restated Net position, December 31 CHANGE IN NET POSITION Governmental Activities 2018 2017 Business -Type Activities 2018 2017 CITY OF MONTICELLO Total 2018 2017 $ 3,008,797 $ 2,962,279 $ 7,988,767 $ 7,765,276 $ 10, 997, 564 $ 10, 727, 555 428,443 429,697 - - 428,443 429,697 2,044,698 1,996,441 925,195 699,901 2,969,893 2,696,342 9,972,166 9,560,482 - - 9,972,166 9,560,482 638,278 648,031 - - 638,278 648,031 386,622 436,248 - - 386,622 436,248 364,364 379,107 162,003 151,126 526,367 530,233 15,000 1,725 379,246 - 394,246 1,725 16,858,368 16,414,010 9,455,211 8,616,303 26,313,579 25,030,313 1,614,613 1,656,666 - - 1,614,613 1,656,666 2,377,661 2,208,971 - - 2,377,661 2,208,971 5,548,199 5,292,743 - - 5,548,199 5,292,743 615,586 614,328 - - 615,586 614,328 18,333 3,191 - - 18,333 3,191 3,460,887 3,521,756 - - 3,460,887 3,521,756 1,206,067 488,380 - - 1,206,067 488,380 617,344 514,558 - - 617,344 514,558 - - 1,235,055 1,157,506 1,235,055 1,157,506 - - 2,932,413 2,708,053 2,932,413 2,708,053 - - 848,221 874,921 848,221 874,921 - - 2,276,015 2,252,287 2,276,015 2,252,287 - - 421,662 390,658 421,662 390,658 15, 458, 690 14, 300, 593 7,713,366 7,383,425 23,172, 056 21, 684, 018 1,399,678 2,113,417 1,741,845 1,232,878 3,141,523 3,346,295 1,000,000 (550,265) (1,000,000) 550,265 - - 2,399,678 1,563,152 741,845 1,783,143 3,141,523 3,346,295 74, 034, 698 72,471, 546 51, 849, 855 50, 066, 712 125, 884, 553 122, 538, 258 155,240 - (79,984) - 75,256 - 74,189,938 72,471,546 51,769,871 50,066,712 125,959,809 3,346,295 $ 76,589,616 $ 74,034,698 $ 52,511,716 $ 51,849,855 $ 129,101, 332 $ 125, 884, 553 13 Management's Discussion and Analysis Property t 59% Revenues by Source - Governmental Activities Investment earnings 2/ Charges for services 18% Operating grants & ^ },ibutions si I grants & 'ibutions 12% 1[1uema11` Franchise taxes 4% 2 Program Expenses and Revenues - Governmental Activities $6 $5 $4 $3 H $2 IL0 $1 ewe �0�5 oc `mc5� J`J�e �o<ti 5 oe Jo\\o J�\�o 0ao ,o�oQ \C1 y�2r ■ Program Expenses ■ Program Revenues CITY OF MONTICELLO Governmental Activities. The most significant revenue source for governmental activities is property taxes at 59% of total revenues. Property taxes support the General Fund, Community Center Fund, Economic Development Authority Fund, Capital Project Fund, and Debt Service Fund. Charges for services accounts for 18% of revenues, with about half generated by the Community Center. Capital grants and contributions include special assessments and revenues from other sources restricted to capital asset acquisition. Investment earnings include both interest received and the increase (decrease) in the investment fair values. Tax increments are property taxes collected in tax increment financing districts and are restricted for development purposes. Governmental activities revenues increased $444,358 (3%) in the current year, with the most significant portions of the increase attributable to an increase in 2018 property taxes. Charges for services increased $46,518 (2%) with an increase in garbage rates offset by a decrease in building permits. Property taxes increased by $411,684 (4%) percent. Capital grants and contributions were affected by developer -donated public improvements in the Featherstone Third addition. Public works (engineering, streets, ice and snow removal, shop and garage, street lighting, etc.) expenses are the most significant (36%), followed by recreation and culture (22%), public safety (15%), general government (11 %), economic development (8%), sanitation (4%), and others (4%). Included in these amounts is depreciation expense, which is 27% of the total expenses for governmental activities. Governmental activities expenses increased $1,158,097 (8%) in the current year. The most significant changes in program expenses were as follows: • Economic development expenses increased $717,687 (147%) with a jump in redevelopment expenses in 2018 for payments to tenants for relocation costs and other expenses related to property acquisitions. • Public works increased $255,456 (5%) due to an increase in depreciation, which was caused by the first year of depreciation on assets put in service at the end of 2017. The replacement of a public works director after the position was held vacant for a number of years also contributed to the increase. • Public safety increased $168,690 (8%) with inflation and a July increase in contracted police hours along with the hiring of a fire marshal position/emergency management coordinator. • Interest and fiscal charges increased $102,786 (20%) with the first year of payments on the 2017A bonds. 14 ax Management's Discussion and Analysis $ 3.5 $ 3.0 $ z.5 $ z.0 $1.5 $1.0 $0.s s- Revenues by Source - Business -Type Activities Investment Capital grants & earnings Gain on sale of 2% contributions) l capital assets 10% \ I 4% services 84% Program Revenues and Expenses - Business -Type Activities Water Utility Sewage Utility Liquor Fiber Optics Deputy Registrar ■ Program Expenses ■ Program Revenues CITY OF MONTICELLO Business -type Activities. Business -type activities increased the city's net position by $741,845, which is $1,041,298 less than the prior fiscal year increase in business -type net position. The change is mostly attributable to significantly higher transfers out (roughly $1.5 million) to other funds for current and future capital asset purchases. This increase in transfers out was offset by higher capital contribution revenue due to public improvements donated by a developer in the Featherstone Third addition. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS OF THE CITY'S FUNDS Governmental funds. The focus of the city's governmental funds is to provide information on near-term inflows, outflows, and balances of spendable resources. Such information is useful in assessing the city's financing requirements. In particular, spendable fund balances may serve as a useful measure of a government's net resources available for expenditure at the end of the fiscal year. At December 31, 2018, the city's governmental funds reported total ending fund balances of $30,170,552, a decrease of $1,716,570 (5%) when compared with the prior year. Approximately 19% or $5,867,997 of the total ending fund balances constituted restricted fund balances, which are considered unavailable for appropriation for general operations. The $172,264 nonspendable fund balance accounted for 0.6% of total governmental fund balances and is comprised of prepaid items. At the end of the fiscal year, the General Fund reported a fund balance of $7,109,478, increasing $80,385 (1%) from the prior year. General fund revenues were $196,448 (2%) more than the prior fiscal year and expenditures increased by $481,711 (6%). Transfers out increased by $400,000. General government expenditures increased $33,841 (2%) with most of the increase related to employee costs. Public safety expenditures increased $175,725 (8%) with inflation and increased hours to the Wright County law enforcement contract as well as a new fire marshal/emergency management coordinator position beginning in the last quarter of the year. Public works administration and ice & snow were largely responsible for the $174,700 (9%) increase in public works expenditures due to the hiring of a public works director and an unusually snowy spring in 2018. Recreation and culture expenditures increased by $81,045 (7%) primarily caused by increased employee costs and the creation of an arts initiative program. 15 Management's Discussion and Analysis The fund balance in the Community Center Fund increased $26,282 (5%) to $606,795. However, an additional $190,984 will be used for the remainder of the HVAC upgrade project to be completed in 2019. Charges for services increased $81,738 (6%) to $1,449,452 in 2018, and miscellaneous revenues increased $39,371(107%) in 2018 in the form of donations for the building upgrades. Expenditures decreased $73,212 (4%) to $1,894,583 due to timing of building improvements with a large portion of a budgeted 2018 project taking place in 2019. The fund balance in Economic Development Authority (EDA) Fund decreased $227,640 (3%) to $7,240,465. The assigned fund balance, which is available for general EDA activity, equaled $4,634,992 at year end. Land held for resale increased by $611,185 (27%) with the acquisition of four properties. Four parcels decreased in value so there was an adjustment to the carrying value. The EDA received $323,186 in property tax revenue and $638,278 in tax increments in 2018. At year end, the restricted $2,603,090 portion of the fund balance is attributable to tax increment districts and loan programs. The fund balance in the Debt Service Fund decreased $409,436 (15%) to $2,391,544. This planned fund balance decrease reflects prior year accumulation of resources to make scheduled bond payments. Special assessment revenue decreased $304,835 (48%) to $327,111, which is related to a large number of prepaid assessments in 2017. In governmental funds, assessments are recorded as a revenue when collectible, which occurs when it is in the current period or soon thereafter. The Capital Projects Fund provides the accounting for acquisition of general government capital assets. Accordingly, the fund accumulates resources from various sources and expenditures may or may not occur in the same year of accumulation. Consequently, the fund balance in the Capital Projects Fund decreased $946,008 (11%) to $7,527,500. Proceeds from the 2018A $5,000,000 tax abatement general obligation bond issue are accounted for in this fund and used to finance the Fallon Avenue Overpass project. The $5,000 transfer to the Debt Service Fund was used to initiate a new sub -fund for the 2018A bonds. Proprietary funds. The proprietary funds provide the same type of information found in the business -type activities in the government -wide financial statements, but in more detail. Water Fund expenses increased $78,247 (7%) with higher utilities and repairs costs. Utility employee personal service costs are divided between the Water Fund and Sewage Fund based on activity. The Water Fund operating revenues increased $16,753 (1 %) with higher rates partially offset by lower consumption. CITY OF MONTICELLO The fund's net position decreased $23,844 (0.2%), excluding the change in accounting standard, to $14,782,772. Depreciation expense for the fund totaled $519,200. Sewage Fund expenses increased $213,872 (8%) and operating revenues increased $109,059 (4%). The 2018 capital contributions of $599,555 included a $84,386 donation of Featherstone Third addition infrastructure from a developer in additional to sewer access charges. The fund's net position increased $690,471 (3%), excluding the change in accounting standard, to $22,110,771. Depreciation expense for the fund totaled $1,183,540. The Liquor Fund's net position increased $180,353 (11 %), excluding the change in accounting standard, to $1,776,378. Liquor and related product sales increased $335,096 (6%) to $6,086,293, exceeding the $6 million threshold for the first time. Gross profit increased $18,365 (1 %) to $1,539,546, which is lower than the sales increase because of the reclassification of freight costs to cost of sales. The Liquor Fund transferred $130,000 to the Fiber Optics Fund and $400,000 to the Park & Pathway Dedication (nonmajor) fund in 2018. Operating expenses decreased $26,197 (3%) to $854,218 with the reclassification of freight costs, and depreciation expense for the fund totaled $28,893. The Fiber Optics Fund's net position decreased $407,106 (3%) to $12,643,701. The fund's 2018 charges for services decreased $15,364 (1%) to $1,734,876. Excluding depreciation, the operating loss increased from $82,234 to $141,524 in 2018. Depreciation expense for the fund totaled $398,798. The city contracted for FiberNet operations management starting July 1, 2016. The Deputy Registrar Fund (DMV) net position increased $279,597 (33%), excluding the change in accounting standard, to $1,102,672. Charges for services increased $97,516 (16%) to $692,217 and operating expenses increased $31,629 (8%) to $429,683. Depreciation for the fund totaled $4,405. In 2017, the DMV transitioned to the new Minnesota's Licensing and Vehicle Registration System (MNLARS) increasing personnel costs. The DMV processed 119,543 transactions, a 52% increase over the prior year. The sharp increase in transactions reflects both the increase in licensing activity and the multiple ways some transactions are counted by the new licensing system. Other factors of the changes in income from operations have previously been discussed in the government -wide financial analysis of business -type activities. 16 Management's Discussion and Analysis GENERAL FUND BUDGETARY HIGHLIGHTS During the year, there were no amendments to the budget. General Fund revenues and other financing sources totaled $8,704,793 and exceeded budget by 417,793 (5%). Charges for services and licenses and permits were $111,064 (28%) and $105,714 (27%) higher than budget, respectively. Charges for services include fire fees, garbage charges to residential properties, and administrative staff time billed to planning and zoning applicants. Licenses and permits, which includes building permits, exceeded estimated revenue. Some revenues can be difficult to predict, and are, therefore, budgeted conservatively. General Fund expenditures totaled $7,924,408 and were $362,592 (4%) less than budget. Other financing uses consisted of unbudgeted transfers out of $700,000. With a partial year position vacancy, low fuel costs, and savings in hiring an engineer internally, public works was $290,100 (12%) less than budget. One function exceeded budget (recreation and culture). Within the functions, eleven of thirty-four reporting units exceeded budget. CAPITAL ASSETS AND DEBT ADMINISTRATION CITY OF MONTICELLO The General Fund year end fund balances since 2011 are as follows: CAPITAL ASSETS Governmental Activities 2018 2017 Year 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Business -Type Activities 2018 2017 Amount $ 4,410,637 3,478,507 3,914,563 4,331,058 4,986,796 6,276,720 7,029,093 7,109,478 Total 2018 2017 Land $ 10,908,050 $ 10,610,630 $ 730,695 $ 1,197,945 $ 11,638,745 $ 11,808,575 Construction in progress 9,663,111 2,458,275 - 160,000 9,663,111 2,618,275 Buildings and systems 102,600,286 100,225,314 85,255,259 84,014,822 187,855,545 184,240,136 Machinery and equipment 6,122,457 5,951,126 3,488,117 2,971,727 9,610,574 8,922,853 Less: Accumulated depreciation (61,435,144) (57,280,565) (46,204,350) (44,097,800) (107,639,494) (101,378,365) Net total $ 67,858,760 $ 61,964,780 Capital assets. The city's investment in capital assets for its governmental and business -type activities at December 31, 2018 totaled $111,128,481 (net of accumulated depreciation). This investment in capital assets includes land, construction in progress, buildings and systems, including infrastructure, and machinery and equipment, including intangible assets. Major governmental activities capital assets changes: completion of the 2017 Street Reconstruction project, right-of-way land acquisitions and significant construction as part of the Fallon Avenue Overpass project, park improvements at $ 43, 269, 721 $ 44, 246, 694 $ 111,128, 481 $ 106, 211,474 Bertram Chain of Lakes, work started on HVAC upgrades at the Community Center, and equipment additions in the Central Equipment Fund of $174,573. Business -type capital assets: sewer improvements as part of the Chelsea Road street and utilities improvement project. The total increase from the prior fiscal year is 4.6%; governmental activities increased nearly 9.5% and business -type activities decreased 2.2%. Additional information on the city's capital assets can be found in the notes to the financial statements on pages 42-43. 17 Management's Discussion and Analysis OUTSTANDING INDEBTEDNESS Governmental Activities 2018 2017 Business -Type Activities 2018 2017 CITY OF MONTICELLO Total 2018 2017 General obligation bonds $ 5,375,000 $ 5,785,000 $ 2,095,000 $ 2,280,000 $ 7,470,000 $ 8,065,000 Certificate of indebtedness 135,000 200,000 - - 135,000 200,000 Special assessment bonds 10,925,000 12,695,000 - - 10,925,000 12,695,000 Tax abatement bonds 7,800,000 2,960,000 - - 7,800,000 2,960,000 Public facilities authority loan - - 1,903,000 1,998,402 1,903,000 1,998,402 Total $ 24,235,000 $ 21,640,000 $ 3,998,000 $ 4,278,402 $ 28,233,000 $ 25,918,402 Long-term Debt. The city's outstanding long-term debt, including general obligation bonds, certificates of indebtedness, special assessment bonds, tax abatement bonds, and a public facilities authority loan, totaled $28,233,000 at December 31, 2018. In 2018, the city issued $5,000,000 in tax abatement bonds (governmental activities) to finance the 2018 Fallon Avenue overpass project. Business -type long-term debt decreased with regularly scheduled payments in excess of the addition of debt (public facilities authority loan) related to the wastewater plant improvements. All other changes are the result of scheduled payments. Additional information on the city's long-term liabilities can be found in the notes to the financial statements on pages 43-46 of this report. ECONOMIC FACTORS AND NEXT YEAR'S BUDGETS AND RATES • The unemployment rate for the Wright County, Minnesota area for December 31, 2018 was 3.4%, which is slightly above the state average (3.2%) and below the national average (3.7%). • The state and local economy are improving. New commercial and residential development continued to grow at a sustainable pace in 2018. • The occupancy rate of the city's business district has remained constant over the last few years and new commercial construction is growing. • Inflationary trends in the region compare favorably to national indices and housing prices have risen the last few years. • The prospects for continued residential and commercial growth in 2019 look promising. REQUESTS FOR INFORMATION This financial report is designed to provide a general overview of the city's finances for all those interested in governmental finance. Questions concerning any information in the report or requests for additional information should be addressed to City of Monticello, Finance Department, 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1, Monticello, MN 55362. 18 # 4 r F 7i Y!,�.�'�y� , '� X47 iti4�'Y�• •� J�[� Sjp•� �.T t BASIC STATEMENTS L �4 7TT�e r CITY OF MONTICELLO Statement of Net Position December 31, 2018 The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement. 19 Governmental Business -type Activities Activities Total ASSETS Cash and investments $ 29,870,022 $ 13,601,972 $ 43,471,994 Receivables Unremitted taxes 54,408 - 54,408 Deliquent taxes 34,126 - 34,126 Unremitted special assessments 13,465 3,467 16,932 Deliquent special assessments 4,355 11,507 15,862 Deferred special assessments 4,838,773 272,670 5,111,443 Accrued interest 152,156 - 152,156 Accounts 185,977 666,467 852,444 Due from other governmental units 2,286,585 47,521 2,334,106 Internal balances (95,422) 95,422 - Inventory - 465,612 465,612 Prepaid items 172,264 45,649 217,913 Notes receivable 283,403 - 283,403 Land held for resale 4,472,364 - 4,472,364 Capital assets Nondepreciable 20,571,161 730,695 21,301,856 Depreciable, net 47,287,599 42,539,026 89,826,625 TOTAL ASSETS 110,131,236 58,480,008 168,611,244 DEFERRED OUTFLOWS OF RESOURCES Deferred other post -employment benefits resources 9,427 3,850 13,277 Deferred pension resources 549,725 144,455 694,180 TOTAL DEFERRED OUTFLOWS OF RESOURCES 559,152 148,305 707,457 LIABILITIES Accounts and contracts payable 1,095,813 697,908 1,793,721 Accrued interest payable 75,933 12,261 88,194 Other accrued liabilities 166,849 8,483 175,332 Due to other governmental units 94,035 177,525 271,560 Unearned revenue 51,697 - 51,697 Escrow deposits 354,143 - 354,143 Long-term liabilities Due within one year 3,130,977 338,219 3,469,196 Due in more than one year 24,048,661 4,653,110 28,701,771 TOTAL LIABILITIES 29,018,108 5,887,506 34,905,614 DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES Deferred pension resources 727,897 229,091 956,988 Deferred MSA state aid and grants 4,354,767 - 4,354,767 TOTAL DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES 5,082,664 229,091 5,311,755 NET POSITION Net investment in capital assets 43,517,983 39,250,211 82,768,194 Restricted for Debt service 6,082,504 - 6,082,504 Economic development 2,303,467 2,303,467 Tax increment 1,263,114 - 1,263,114 Unrestricted 23,422,548 13,261,505 36,684,053 TOTAL NET POSITION $ 76,589,616 $ 52,511,716 $ 129,101,332 The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement. 19 lZCIOF MontikeHo (This page left blank intentionally) 20 CITY OF MONTICELLO Statement of Activities For the Year Ended December 31, 2018 The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement. 21 Program Revenues Net (Expense) Revenue and Changes in Net Position Operating Capital Charges for Grants and Grants and Governmental Business -type Functions/Programs Expenses Services Contributions Contributions Activities Activities Total Governmental activities General government $ 1,614,613 $ 207,802 $ 6,849 $ $ (1,399,962) $ $ (1,399,962) Public safety 2,377,661 780,236 215,039 (1,382,386) (1,382,386) Public works 5,548,199 217,675 186,577 2,032,280 (3,111,667) (3,111,667) Sanitation 615,586 169,337 19,978 - (426,271) (426,271) Transit 18,333 - - - (18,333) (18,333) Recreation and culture 3,460,887 1,630,915 12,418 (1,817,554) (1,817,554) Economic development 1,206,067 2,832 - (1,203,235) (1,203,235) Interest and fiscal charges 617,344 - - - (617,344) (617,344) Total governmental activities 15,458,690 3,008,797 428,443 2,044,698 (9,976,752) (9,976,752) Business -type activities Water 1,235,055 1,432,194 - 325,640 522,779 522,779 Sewage 2,932,413 2,581,833 599,555 248,975 248,975 Liquor 848,221 1,544,234 - 696,013 696,013 Fiber Optics 2,276,015 1,736,243 (539,772) (539,772) Deputy Registrar 421,662 694,263 - 272,601 272,601 Total business -type activities 7,713,366 7,988,767 - 925,195 1,200,596 1,200,596 Total primary government $ 23,172,056 $ 10,997,564 $ 428,443 $ 2,969,893 (9,976,752) 1,200,596 (8,776,156) General Revenues Property taxes 9,972,166 - 9,972,166 Tax increments 638,278 638,278 Franchise taxes 386,622 - 386,622 Unrestricted investment earnings 364,364 162,003 526,367 Gain on sale of capital assets 15,000 379,246 394,246 Transfers 1,000,000 (1,000,000) - Total general revenues and transfers 12,376,430 (458,751) 11,917,679 Change in Net Position 2,399,678 741,845 3,141,523 Net Position, January 1, as previously reported 74,034,698 51,849,855 125,884,553 Change in accounting standard (Note 14) 155,240 (79,984) 75,256 Net Position, January 1, as restated 74,189,938 51,769,871 125,959,809 Net Position, December 31 $ 76,589,616 $ 52,511,716 $ 129,101,332 The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement. 21 CITY OF MONTICELLO Balance Sheet Governmental Funds December 31, 2018 Economic Total Total Community Development Debt Capital Nonmajor Governmental General Center Authority Service Projects Funds Funds ASSETS Cash and investments $ 7,513,518 $ 689,015 $ 4,204,160 $ 2,380,456 $ 8,755,896 $ 5,194,777 $ 28,737,822 Receivables Unremitted taxes 46,066 - 4,722 - 3,620 - 54,408 Delinquent taxes 33,277 849 - - 34,126 Unremitted special assessments - - 12,462 1,003 13,465 Delinquent special assessments - 761 3,594 4,355 Deferred special assessments 743 3,766,132 1,071,898 4,838,773 Accrued interest 152,156 - - - 152,156 Accounts 43,276 22,022 2,601 - 118,048 185,947 Due from other governmental units 58,241 - - 2,228,344 - 2,286,585 Prepaid items 124,650 26,702 2,383 - 18,529 172,264 Notes receivable - - 194,124 - 89,279 283,403 Land held for resale - - 2,840,575 - 1,631,789 - 4,472,364 TOTAL ASSETS $ 7,971,927 $ 737,739 $ 7,249,414 $ 6,159,811 $ 13,696,144 $ 5,420,633 $ 41,235,668 LIABILITIES Accounts and contracts payable $ 247,577 $ 61,593 $ 8,071 $ 1,374 $ 721,893 $ 36,584 $ 1,077,092 Other accrued liabilities 151,824 15,025 - - - - 166,849 Due to other governmental units 68,218 9,296 29 16,492 94,035 Unearned revenue 6,667 45,030 - - 51,697 Escrow deposits 354,143 - - - - - 354,143 Total liabilities 828,429 130,944 8,100 1,374 738,385 36,584 1,743,816 DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES Unavailable revenue - property taxes 33,277 - 849 - - - 34,126 Unavailable revenue - special assessments 743 - 3,766,893 1,075,492 - 4,843,128 Unavailable revenue - notes receivable - - - 89,279 89,279 Unavailable revenue - MSA state aid and grants - - - 4,354,767 - 4,354,767 Total Deferred Inflows of Resources 34,020 - 849 3,766,893 5,430,259 89,279 9,321,300 FUND BALANCES Nonspendable 124,650 26,702 2,383 - - 18,529 172,264 Restricted - - 2,603,090 2,391,544 - 873,363 5,867,997 Assigned - 580,093 4,634,992 - 7,527,500 4,402,878 17,145,463 Unassigned 6,984,828 - - - - - 6,984,828 Total fund balance 7,109,478 606,795 7,240,465 2,391,544 7,527,500 5,294,770 30,170,552 TOTAL LIABILITIES, DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES, AND FUND BALANCES $ 7,971,927 $ 737,739 $ 7,249,414 $ 6,159,811 $ 13,696,144 $ 5,420,633 $ 41,235,668 The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement. 22 CITY OF MONTICELLO Reconciliation of the Governmental Funds Balance Sheet to the Statement of Net Position December 31, 2018 Amounts reported for governmental activities in the statement of net position are different because Total fund balances - governmental funds $ 30,170,552 Capital assets used in governmental activities are not financial resources and, therefore, are not reported in the funds. Land $ 10,908,050 Construction in progress 9,663,111 Buildings and systems 102,600,286 Machinery and equipment 4,422,197 Accumulated depreciation (60,942,252) 66,651,392 Governmental funds do not report long-term amounts related to other post -employment benefits and pensions. Deferred outflows of resources - OPEB $ 9,427 Deferred outflows of resources - pensions 549,725 Deferred inflows of resources - pensions (727,897) (168,745) Long-term liabilties that pertain to governmental funds, including bonds payable, are not due and payable in the current period and, therefore, are not reported as fund liabilities. All liabilities, both current and long-term, are reported in the Statement of Net Position. Bonds payable $ (23,750,000) Unamortized bond discounts 13,729 Unamortized bond premiums (119,506) Other post -employment benefits liability (220,074) Net pension liability - PERA (2,257,870) Net pension liability - FRA (85,641) (26,419,362) Internal service funds are used by management to charge the costs of central equipment, information technology, and benefit accrual services to individual funds. The assets and liabilities of the internal service funds are included in governmental activities in the Statement of Net Position. Internal service fund net position included in the governmental activities $ 1,560,005 Less internal services net position allocated to to business -type activities (95,422) 1,464,583 Some of the city's property taxes, special assessments, and notes receivable will be collected after year-end, but are not available soon enough to pay for current period expenditures and, therefore, are reported as deferred inflows of resources in the governmental funds. 4,966,533 Interest on long-term debt is not accrued in governmental funds, but rather is recognized as an expenditure when due. Accrued interest for general obligation bonds is included in the Statement of Net Position. (75,337) NET POSITION OF GOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES $ 76,589,616 The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement. 23 CITY OF MONTICELLO Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance Governmental Funds For the Year Ended December 31, 2018 24 Economic Total Total Community Development Debt Capital Nonmajor Governmental General Center Authority Service Projects Funds Funds Revenues Property taxes $ 6,634,769 $ 387,000 $ 323,186 $ 1,787,000 $ 835,595 $ $ 9,967,550 Tax increments - - 638,278 - - 638,278 Franchise taxes 245,000 - - 19,363 122,259 386,622 Special assessments 206 327,111 372,873 - 700,190 Licenses and permits 504,464 - - 504,464 Intergovernmental 428,443 - 483,034 - 911,477 Charges for services 509,464 1,449,452 - 139,446 2,098,362 Fines and forfeitures 45,350 - - - - - 45,350 Investment earnings 106,767 8,242 43,407 33,774 94,431 64,999 351,620 Other revenues 215,330 76,171 2,832 - - 8,136 302,469 Total revenues 8,689,793 1,920,865 1,007,703 2,147,885 1,805,296 334,840 15,906,382 Expenditures Current General government 1,656,557 - - - - - 1,656,557 Public safety 2,354,453 - 2,354,453 Public works 2,079,091 214 2,079,305 Sanitation 615,586 - 615,586 Transit 18,333 - - 18,333 Recreation and culture 1,200,388 1,803,422 - 30,686 3,034,496 Economic development - - 1,151,816 - 58,237 1,210,053 Capital outlay Public works - - 9,009,309 378,874 9,388,183 Recreation and culture 91,161 - - 229,137 320,298 Debt service Principal - 2,285,000 - 2,285,000 Interest and fiscal charges 522,220 - 522,220 Bond issuance costs - - - - 94,350 - 94,350 Total expenditures 7,924,408 1,894,583 1,151,816 2,807,220 9,103,659 697,148 23,578,834 Excess (deficiency) of revenues over expenditures 765,385 26,282 (144,113) (659,335) (7,298,363) (362,308) (7,672,452) Other financing sources (uses) Long-term debt issued - - 5,000,000 5,000,000 Premium on long-term debt issued - 40,882 40,882 Sale of capital assets 15,000 - - - - 15,000 Transfers in - 116,473 249,899 1,316,473 400,000 2,082,845 Transfers out (700,000) (200,000) - (5,000) (277,845) (1,182,845) Total other financing sources (uses) (685,000) - (83,527) 249,899 6,352,355 122,155 5,955,882 Net change in fund balances 80,385 26,282 (227,640) (409,436) (946,008) (240,153) (1,716,570) Fund balance at beginning of year 7,029,093 580,513 7,468,105 2,800,980 8,473,508 5,534,923 31,887,122 Fund balance at end of year $ 7,109,478 $ 606,795 $ 7,240,465 $ 2,391,544 $ 7,527,500 $ 5,294,770 $ 30,170,552 The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement. 24 CITY OF MONTICELLO Reconciliation of the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds to the Statement of Activities For the Year Ended December 31, 2018 Amounts reported for governmental activities in the Statement of Activities are different because Net change in fund balances - governmental funds $ (1,716,570) Governmental funds reported capital outlays as expenditures. However, in the statement of activities the cost of those assets is allocated over their estimated useful lives and reported as depreciation expense. This is the amount by which capital outlays exceeded depreciation in the current period. Capital outlays $ 9,580,224 Capital contributions 323,130 Depreciation (4,024,293) 5,879,061 Proceeds from long-term debt provide financial resources to governmental funds, but the issuing of debt increases long-term liabilities in the Statement of Net Position. (5,000,000) Repayment of long-term debt principal is an expenditure in the governmental funds, but the repayment reduces long-term liabilities in the Statement of Net Position. 2,285,000 Some expenses reported in the Statement of Activities do not require the use of current financial resources and, therefore, are not reported as expenditures in the governmental funds. Amortization of bond discounts $ (2,600) Premium on long-term debt issued (40,882) Amortization of bond premiums 66,041 Change in total OPEB liability and deferred outflows of resources (14,824) Change accrued interest payable (9,968) (2,233) Long-term pension activity is not reported in governmental funds Pension revenue from state contributions 17,270 Pension expense 132,988 Deferred inflows of resources are revenues included in the change in net position, but are excluded from the change in fund balances until they are available to liquidate liabilities of the current period. Taxes $ 4,616 Special assessments 555,645 Notes receivable (27,500) 532,761 Internal service funds are used by management to charge the costs of certain activities to individual funds The net revenue of the internal service funds is reported with governmental activities. Internal service fund activity included in governmental activities $ 293,775 Subtract internal service fund activity allocated to business -type activities (22,374) 271,401 Change in net position of governmental activities $ 2,399,678 The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement. 25 Statement of Net Position Proprietary Funds December 31, 2018 ASSETS Current assets Cash and investments Receivables Unremitted special assessments Deliquent special assessments Deferred special assessments Accounts Due from other governmental units Inventory Prepaid items Total current assets Noncurrent assets Capital assets Land Buildings and systems Machinery and equipment Total capital assets Less accumulated depreciation Total capital assets (net) TOTAL ASSETS DEFERRED OUTFLOWS OF RESOURCES Deferred other post -employment benefits resources Deferred pension resources TOTAL DEFERRED OUTFLOWS OF RESOURCES CITY OF MONTICELLO (continued) 26 Governmental Business -Type Activities - Enterprise Funds Activities - Deputy Internal Water Sewage Liquor Fiber Optics Registrar Totals Service Funds $ 5,114,048 $ 5,010,271 $ 1,804,170 $ 334,807 $ 1,338,676 $ 13,601,972 $ 1,132,200 3,467 - - - - 3,467 - 11,507 - - 11,507 261,696 10,974 - - 272,670 - 149,341 438,422 - 78,704 - 666,467 30 - - - - 47,521 47,521 - - - 465,612 - - 465,612 12,238 20,790 10,237 1,000 1,384 45,649 - 5,552,297 5,480,457 2,280,019 414,511 1,387,581 15,114,865 1,132,230 208,143 516,952 5,600 - - 730,695 - 21,097,802 48,365,434 807,257 14,896,665 88,101 85,255,259 - 302,728 2,697,300 168,098 305,726 14,265 3,488,117 1,700,260 21,608,673 51,579,686 980,955 15,202,391 102,366 89,474,071 1,700,260 (12,185,759) (30,172,912) (841,745) (2,958,552) (45,382) (46,204,350) (492,892) 9,422,914 21,406,774 139,210 12,243,839 56,984 43,269,721 1,207,368 14,975,211 26,887,231 2,419,229 12,658,350 1,444,565 58,384,586 2,339,598 797 797 1,459 - 797 3,850 - 22,223 27,780 61,116 33,336 144,455 23,020 28,577 62,575 34,133 148,305 (continued) 26 Statement of Net Position Proprietary Funds December 31, 2018 (Continued) LIABILITIES Current liabilities Accounts and contracts payable Accrued interest payable Other accrued liabilities Due to other governmental units Bonds and loans payable - current Compensated absences due within one year Total current liabilities Noncurrent liabilities Bonds and loans payable - net current portion Compensated absences payable Total OPEB liability Net pension liability Total noncurrent liabilities TOTAL LIABILITIES DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES Deferred pension resources NET POSITION Net investment in capital assets Unrestricted TOTAL NET POSITION CITY OF MONTICELLO 9,422,914 17,387,264 139,210 12,243,839 56,984 5,359,858 4,723,507 1,637,168 399,862 1,045,688 $ 14,782,772 $ 22,110,771 $ 1,776,378 $ 12,643,701 $ 1,102,672 Adjustment to reflect the cumulative internal balance for the net effect of the activity between the internal service funds and the enterprise funds over time Net position of business -type activities (page 19) The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement. 39,250,211 722,368 13,166,083 837,637 52,416,294 $ 1,560,005 95,422 $ 52,511,716 27 Governmental Business -Type Activities - Enterprise Funds Activities - Deputy Internal Water Sewage Liquor Fiber Optics Registrar Totals Service Funds $ 7,404 $ 536,138 $ 134,587 $ 14,649 $ 5,130 $ 697,908 $ 18,721 - 12,261 - - - 12,261 596 6,050 - 2,433 - 8,483 - 8,328 4,125 63,609 101,463 177,525 - - 288,000 - - 288,000 120,000 10,039 10,039 20,411 - 9,730 50,219 155,977 31,821 850,563 221,040 14,649 116,323 1,234,396 295,294 - 3,731,510 - - - 3,731,510 365,000 7,750 7,750 17,739 5,167 38,406 119,299 18,598 18,598 34,095 18,598 89,889 - 122,046 152,560 335,628 183,071 793,305 - 148,394 3,910,418 387,462 - 206,836 4,653,110 484,299 180,215 4,760,981 608,502 14,649 323,159 5,887,506 779,593 35,244 44,056 96,924 - 52,867 229,091 - 9,422,914 17,387,264 139,210 12,243,839 56,984 5,359,858 4,723,507 1,637,168 399,862 1,045,688 $ 14,782,772 $ 22,110,771 $ 1,776,378 $ 12,643,701 $ 1,102,672 Adjustment to reflect the cumulative internal balance for the net effect of the activity between the internal service funds and the enterprise funds over time Net position of business -type activities (page 19) The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement. 39,250,211 722,368 13,166,083 837,637 52,416,294 $ 1,560,005 95,422 $ 52,511,716 27 lZCIOF MontikeHo (This page left blank intentionally) 28 Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Net Position Proprietary Funds For the Year Ended December 31, 2018 Sales and cost of sales Net sales Cost of sales Gross profit Operating revenues Charges for services Other Total operating revenues Operating expenses Personal services Materials and supplies Other services and charges Depreciation Total operating expenses Operating income (loss) Nonoperating revenues (expenses) Investment earnings Interest expense Gain on sale of capital asset Total Nonoperating revenes (expenses) Income (loss) before capital contributions and transfers Capital contributions Transfers in Transfers out Change in net position Net Position, January 1, as previously reported Change in accounting standard (Note 14) Net Position, January 1, as restated Net Position, December 31 CITY OF MONTICELLO Adjustment to reflect the consolidation of internal service fund related to enterprise funds 22,374 Change in net position of business -type activities (page 21) $ 741,845 The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement. 29 Governmental Business -Type Activities - Enterprise Funds Activities - Deputy Internal Water Sewage Liquor Fiber Optics Registrar Totals Service Funds $ 6,086,293 $ 6,086,293 (4,546,747) (4,546,747) 1,539,546 1,539,546 $ 1,351,067 $ 2,580,416 - $ 1,734,876 $ 692,217 6,358,576 $ 548,601 81,127 1,417 4,688 1,367 2,046 90,645 120 1,432,194 2,581,833 4,688 1,736,243 694,263 6,449,221 548,721 255,694 328,965 592,745 205 378,669 1,556,278 25,899 168,350 131,864 556 111,403 9,364 421,537 31,282 295,342 1,213,599 232,024 1,766,159 37,245 3,544,369 135,707 519,200 1,183,540 28,893 398,798 4,405 2,134,836 171,636 1,238,586 2,857,968 854,218 2,276,565 429,683 7,657,020 364,524 193,608 (276,135) 690,016 (540,322) 264,580 331,747 184,197 56,908 66,525 20,337 3,216 15,017 162,003 12,744 - (78,720) - - - (78,720) (13,365) - 379,246 - - - 379,246 - 56,908 367,051 20,337 3,216 15,017 462,529 (621) 250,516 90,916 710,353 (537,106) 279,597 794,276 183,576 325,640 599,555 - - - 925,195 10,199 - - 130,000 130,000 300,000 (600,000) - (530,000) - - (1,130,000) (200,000) (23,844) 690,471 180,353 (407,106) 279,597 719,471 293,775 14,823,165 21,436,849 1,626,362 13,050,807 839,624 1,266,230 (16,549) (16,549) (30,337) - (16,549) - 14,806,616 21,420,300 1,596,025 13,050,807 823,075 1,266,230 $ 14,782,772 $ 22,110,771 $ 1,776,378 $ 12,643,701 $ 1,102,672 $ 1,560,005 Adjustment to reflect the consolidation of internal service fund related to enterprise funds 22,374 Change in net position of business -type activities (page 21) $ 741,845 The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement. 29 Statement of Cash Flows Proprietary Funds For the Year Ended December 31, 2018 Cash flows from operating activities Cash received from customers and users Cash from interfund services provided Cash paid to suppliers for goods and services Cash paid to employees Cash paid to other funds for services provided Net cash provided (used) by operating activities Cash flows from noncapital financing activities Transfers from other funds Transfers to other funds Net cash provided (used) by noncapital financing activities Cash flows from capital and related financing activities Capital contributions Sale of assets Acquisition of capital assets Long-term debt issued Principal paid on long-term debt Interest and fiscal charges paid on long-term debt Net cash provided (used) by capital and related financing activities Cash flows from investing activities Interest on investments Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents Cash and cash equivalents, January 1 Cash and cash equivalents, December 31 CITY OF MONTICELLO (continued) 30 Governmental Business -Type Activities - Enterprise Funds Activities - Deputy Internal Water Sewage Liquor Fiber Optics Registrar Totals Service Funds $ 1,375,016 $ 2,537,678 $ 6,089,952 $ 1,679,899 $ 653,265 $ 12,335,810 $ - - - 548,721 (467,771) (1,265,900) (4,760,298) (1,877,048) (21,837) (8,392,854) (164,883) (266,735) (342,440) (619,671) (205) (391,575) (1,620,626) (9,824) (11,893) (16,686) (1,530) (22,317) (62,250) - 630,686 917,445 693,297 (198,884) 217,536 2,260,080 383,838 - - - 130,000 - 130,000 300,000 (600,000)_ (530,000) - (1,130,000) (200,000) (600,000) (530,000) 130,000 _ (1,000,000) 100,000 208,449 515,169 - 723,618 - - 849,995 849,995 (40,530) (934,229) (33,570) (1,008,329) (176,356) 6,747 6,747 (287,149) (287,149) (120,000) (81,125) (81,125) (13,485) 167,919 69,408 (33,570) - 203,757 (309,841) 56,908 66,525 20,337 3,216 15,017 162,003 12,744 255,513 1,053,378 150,064 (65,668) 232,553 1,625,840 186,741 4,858,535 3,956,893 1,654,106 400,475 1,106,123 11,976,132 945,459 $ 5,114,048 $ 5,010,271 $ 1,804,170 $ 334,807 $ 1,338,676 $ 13,601,972 $ 1,132,200 (continued) 30 Statement of Cash Flows Proprietary Funds For the Year Ended December 31, 2018 (Continued) Reconciliation of operating income (loss) to net cash provided (used) by operating activities Operating income (loss) Adjustments to reconcile operating income (loss) to net cash provided (used) by operating activities Depreciation OPEB expense Other expense related to operations (Increase) decrease in assets Special assessments receivable Accounts receivable Due from other governmental units Inventory Prepaid items (Increase) decrease in deferred outflows Deferred pension resources Increase (decrease) in liabilities Accounts and contracts payable Other liabilities Due to other governmental units Compensated absences Net pension liability Increase (decrease) in deferred inflows Deferred pension resources Net cash provided (used) by operating activities Schedule of noncash investing, capital and financing activities: Net amortization of bond premium (discount) Disposal of capital assets Capital assets purchased on account Capital contributions Change in total OPEB liability Business -Type Activities - Enterprise Funds Deputy Water Sewage Liquor Fiber Optics Registrar CITY OF MONTICELLO Totals Governmental Activities - Internal Service Funds $ 193,608 $ (276,135) $ 690,016 $ (540,322) $ 264,580 $ 331,747 $ 184,197 519,200 1,183,540 28,893 398,798 4,405 2,134,836 171,636 1,252 1,252 2,299 - 1,252 6,055 - - - 9,355 - 9,355 (67,951) 695 - (67,256) 4,758 (44,850) (56,344) (96,436) - - (9,642) (9,642) - - 7,753 - 7,753 (268) 558 721 563 1,574 13,770 17,212 37,867 20,655 89,504 - (13,786) 65,966 (17,913) (1,016) 1,892 35,143 2,106 6,015 - (1,029) - 4,986 - 151 1,146 2,427 (31,356) (27,632) - (2,553) (2,553) (2,442) 451 (7,097) 25,899 (18,145) (22,680) (49,897) (27,216) (117,938) - (5,365) (6,706) (14,753) (8,048) (34,872) - $ 630,686 $ 917,445 $ 693,297 $ (198,884) $ 217,536 $ 2,260,080 $ 383,838 $ - $ 1,986 $ - $ $ - $ 1,986 $ - $ $ 470,749 $ 9,355 $ $ $ 480,104 $ $ $ 442,290 $ - $ $ $ 442,290 $ - $ 117,191 $ 84,386 $ - $ $ $ 201,577 $ 10,199 $ 2,049 $ 2,049 $ 3,758 $ $ 2,049 $ 9,905 $ - The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement. 31 Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2018 NOTE 1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES The basic financial statements of the city of Monticello, Minnesota (the city) have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles (GAAP) generally accepted in the United States of America as applied to governmental units, as applied by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB). GASB is the accepted standard-setting body for establishing governmental accounting and financial reporting principles. The significant accounting policies of the city are described as follows: A. Reportina entitv Incorporated in 1856, the city of Monticello is designated as a third-class city (population 10,001 to 20,000) and governed by statutory city code under Optional Plan A in Minnesota statutes. The city falls under section 501(a) of the Internal Revenue Code. The five -member mayor -council is elected on staggered, even -numbered years. Councilors are elected at -large to four-year terms while the mayor is elected to a two-year term. The governing body appoints an administrator to implement policies and oversee daily operations. The accompanying financial statements include all funds, departments, agencies, boards, commissions, and other organizations that comprise the city, along with any component units. Component units are legally separate entities for which the city (primary government) is financially accountable, or for which the exclusion of the component unit would render the financial statements of the primary government misleading. Criteria used to determine if the primary government is financially accountable for a component unit includes whether or not the primary government appoints the voting majority of the potential component unit's governing body, is able to impose its will on the potential component unit, is in a relationship of financial benefit or burden with the potential component unit, or is fiscally depended upon by the potential component unit. The Monticello Economic Development Authority (EDA) was created pursuant to Minnesota Statutes § 469.090 through § 469.108 to carryout economic and industrial development and redevelopment within the city in accordance with policies established by the City Council. The seven -member Board of Directors consists of two councilmembers and five members from the community appointed by the City Council. The City Council reviews and approves the tax levy and all expenditures for the EDA. Therefore, the EDA is reported as a blended component unit within the EDA Special Revenue Fund. Separate financial statements are not issued for this component unit. CITY OF MONTICELLO The mayor and council are responsible for appointing some members of other organizations. However, the city's accountability for these organizations does not extend beyond making appointments. B. Government -wide and fund financial statements The government -wide financial statements (i.e., the statement of net position and the statement of activities) report information on all of the activities of the primary government and its component unit. Governmental activities, which normally are supported by taxes and intergovernmental revenues, are reported separately from business -type activities, which rely to a significant extent on fees and charges for support. The statement of activities demonstrates the degree to which the direct expenses of a given function or segment is offset by program revenues. Direct expenses are those that are clearly identifiable with a specific function. Program revenues include 1) charges to customers or applicants who purchase, use, or directly benefit from goods, services, or privileges provided by a given function or segment and 2) grants and contributions that are restricted to meeting the operation or capital requirements of a particular function or segment. Taxes and other items not properly included among program revenues are reported instead as general revenues. Separate financial statements are provided for governmental funds and proprietary funds. Major individual governmental funds and major individual enterprise funds are reported as separate columns in the fund financial statements. Aggregated information for the remaining nonmajor funds are reported in single columns in the respective fund financial statements. The city applies restricted resources first when an expense is incurred for which both restricted and unrestricted resources are available. Depreciation expense is included in the direct expense of each function. Interest on long-term debt of governmental activities is considered an indirect expense and is reported separately on the Statement of Activities. C. Measurement focus. basis of accountina. and financial statement presentation The government -wide financial statements are reported using the economic resources measurement focus and the accrual basis of accounting, as are the proprietary fund financial statements. Revenues are recorded when earned and expenses are recorded when a liability is incurred, regardless of the timing of related cash flows. Property taxes and special assessments, if levied, are recognized as revenues in the year for which they are levied. Grants and similar 32 Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2018 items are recognized as revenue as soon as all eligibility requirements imposed by the provider have been met. Governmental fund financial statements are reported using the current financial resources measurement focus and the modified accrual basis of accounting. Revenues are recognized as soon as they are both measurable and available. Revenues are considered available when they are collectible with the current period or soon enough thereafter to pay liabilities of the current period. For this purpose, the city considers revenue to be available if they are collected within 60 days of the end of the current fiscal period. Expenditures generally are recorded when a liability is incurred, as under accrual accounting. However, debt service expenditures, as well as expenditures related to claims and judgments, compensated absences, other post -employment benefits, and net pension liabilities, are recognized as expenditures to the extent they have matured. Capital asset acquisitions are reported as capital outlay expenditures in the governmental funds. Proceeds from long-term debt are reported as other financing sources. Property taxes, franchise taxes, licenses, and investment interest associated with the current fiscal period are all considered to be susceptible to accrual and have been recognized as revenues of the current fiscal period. All other revenue items are considered to be measurable and available only when cash is received by the city. Since governmental fund statements are presented using a measurement focus and basis of accounting different from that used in the government -wide statements' governmental column, a reconciliation is presented that briefly explains the adjustments necessary to reconcile ending net position and the change in net position. In the fund financial statements, financial transactions and accounts of the city are organized on the basis of funds. The operation of each fund is considered to be an independent fiscal and separate accounting entity, with a self -balancing set of accounts recording cash and/or other financial resources together with all related liabilities and residual equities or balances, and changes therein, which are segregated for the purpose of carrying on specific activities or attaining certain objectives in accordance with special regulations, restriction, or limitations. Maior Governmental Funds — The major governmental funds reported by the city are as follows: General Fund — The General Fund is used to account for all financial resources except those required to be accounted for in another fund. CITY OF MONTICELLO Community Center Fund — The Community Center (special revenue) Fund accounts for the revenues and expenditures related to the community center. In addition to a property tax allocation, the community center generates significant revenue from charges for memberships, program activities, and space rentals. Economic Development Authority (EDA) Fund— The EDA (special revenue) Fund is used to account for revenues and expenditures related to the blended component unit. Tax increments, generated mainly by economic and redevelopment districts, and a property tax levy are the EDA's primary revenue sources. Debt Service Fund — The Debt Service Fund is used to account for the accumulation of resources for and the payment of long-term debt principal, interest, and related costs. Capital Projects Fund — The Capital Projects Fund is used to account for financial resources to be used for the acquisition or construction of major capital facilities (other than those financed by proprietary funds). Maior Proorietary Funds — The city reports the following major proprietary funds: Water Fund — The Water (enterprise) Fund is used to account for all activities necessary to provide water services to the residents and businesses of the city. Sewage Fund — The Sewage (enterprise) Fund is used to account for all activities necessary to provide sewage services to the residents and businesses of the city. Liquor Fund — The Liquor (enterprise) Fund is used to account for the operations of the city's liquor store. Fiber Optics Fund — The Fiber Optics (enterprise) Fund is used to account for all activities necessary to provide fiber optic services to the residents and businesses of the city. Deputy Registrar Fund— The Deputy Registrar (enterprise) Fund is used to account for the operation of city's department of motor vehicles. 33 Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2018 Additionally, the city reports the following fund type: Internal Service Funds — These funds account for the city's benefit accrual, central equipment, and information technology services. Internal service funds operate in a manner similar to enterprise funds; however, they provide services primarily to other city departments. As a general rule, the effect of interfund activity has been eliminated from the government -wide financial statements. Exceptions to this general rule are charges between the city's enterprise funds and various other functions of the city. Elimination of these charges would distort the direct costs and program revenues of the various functions concerned. Amounts reported as program revenues include 1) charges to customers or applicants for goods, services, or privileges provided, 2) operating grants and contributions, and 3) capital grants and contributions, including special assessments. Internally dedicated resources are reported as general revenues rather than as program revenues. Likewise, general revenues include all taxes the city has the authority to impose. Proprietary funds distinguish operating revenues and expenses from non- operating items. Operating revenues and expenses generally result from providing services and producing and delivering goods in connection with a proprietary fund's principal ongoing operations. The principal operating revenues of the city's enterprise and internal service funds are charges to customers for sales and services. Operating expenses for enterprise and internal service funds include cost of sales and services, administrative expenses, and depreciation on capital assets. All revenue and expenses not meeting this definition are reported as non-operating revenues and expenses. Aggregated information for the internal service funds is reported in a single column in the proprietary fund financial statements. Because the principal user of the internal services is the city's governmental activities, the financial statements of the internal service funds are consolidated into the governmental column when presented in the government -wide financial statements. The cost of these services is reported in the appropriate functional activity. D. Cash and Investments Cash and investments include balances from all funds that are combined and invested to the extent available in savings accounts, certificates of deposit, U.S. government obligations, and other securities authorized by state statutes. Earnings from investments are allocated to the respective funds on the basis of applicable participation by each fund. CITY OF MONTICELLO For purposes of the statement of cash flows, the city considers all highly liquid debt instruments with an original maturity from the time of purchase by the city of three months or less to be cash equivalents. The proprietary fund's equity in the government -wide cash and investment management pool is considered to be cash equivalent. Investments are generally stated at fair value, except for investments in external investment pools, which are stated at amortized cost. Short-term highly liquid debt instruments (including commercial paper, banker's acceptances, and U.S. treasury and agency obligations) purchased with a remaining maturity of one year or less are reported at amortized cost. Investment income is accrued at the balance sheet date. The city categorizes its fair value measurements within the fair value hierarchy established by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The hierarchy is based on the valuation inputs used to measure the fair value of the asset as follows: • Level 1 inputs are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets • Level 2 inputs are significant other observable inputs • Level 3 inputs are significant unobservable inputs. Debt securities classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy are valued using a matrix pricing technique. Matrix pricing is used to value securities based on the securities' relationship to benchmark quoted prices. See Note 2 for the city's recurring fair value measurements as of December 31, 2018. E. Property Taxes Property tax levies are set by the city council each year and are certified to Wright County for collection in the following year. In Minnesota, counties act as collection agents for all property taxes. Wright County spreads all levies over taxable property. Such taxes become a lien on January 1 and are recorded as receivables by the city on that date. Most property taxes can be paid without penalty and interest by taxpayers in two equal installments on May 15 and October 15. Wright County provides tax settlements to cities and other taxing districts several times throughout the year. Within the governmental fund financial statements, the city recognizes property tax revenue when it becomes both measurable and available to finance expenditures of the current period. Taxes which remain unpaid at December 31 are classified as delinquent taxes receivable and are offset by deferred inflows of resources because it is not available to finance current expenditures. 34 Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2018 Deferred inflows of resources in governmental activities are susceptible to full accrual on the government -wide financial statements. F. Special Assessments Special assessments are levied against the benefiting properties for the assessable costs of special assessment improvement projects in accordance with Minnesota Statutes. The city usually adopts assessment rolls when individual public improvement projects are complete or substantially complete. The assessments are collectible over a term of years generally consistent with the term of years for the related bond issue. Collection of annual installments (including interest) is handled by the county in the same manner as property taxes. Property owners are allowed to prepay total future installments without interest or prepayment penalties. Once a special assessment roll is adopted, the amount attributed to each parcel is a lien upon that property until full payment is made or the amount is determined to be excessive by the city council or court action. If special assessments are left unpaid, the property is subject to tax forfeited sale and the first proceeds of that sale (after costs, penalties, and expenses of sale) are remitted to the city in payment of delinquent special assessments. Generally, the city will collect the full amount of its special assessments not adjusted by city council or court action. Pursuant to state statutes, a property shall be subject to tax forfeit sale after three years of delinquency except for homesteaded, agricultural or seasonal recreational property, which is subject to sale after five years. These assessments are recorded as delinquent (levied, but not yet paid) and deferred (certified, but not yet levied) special assessments receivable, and are offset by deferred inflows of resources in the governmental fund financial statements. Unremitted special assessment amounts collected by Wright County are recorded as unremitted special assessments. G. Receivables Utility and miscellaneous accounts receivable are reported at gross value. Since the city is generally able to certify delinquent amounts to the county for collection as special assessments, no allowance for uncollectible accounts has been provided on current receivables. The city contracted with a third party to manage Fibernet beginning on July 1, 2016. On a monthly basis, the city receives amounts billed by Arvig with an estimated portion withheld for uncollectible account. Customer receivable CITY OF MONTICELLO balances are carried by Arvig rather than the city. Therefore, no allowance for uncollectible accounts is set up in the proprietary Fiber Optics Fund. A receivable is considered past due if any portion of the receivable balance is outstanding for more than 30 days. Interest is charged on receivables that are considered past due. Accrual of interest is not suspended until a receivable is determined to be uncollectible. Provisions for bad debts would be insignificant and none have been made for 2018. Interest receivable is recorded as revenue in the year the interest is earned and is available to pay liabilities of the current period. The interest receivable balance is reported as one amount in the General Fund while all other funds receive interest revenue distributions in cash. H. Inventories The inventories of the proprietary funds are stated at cost using the first -in, first - out (FIFO) method. Enterprise fund inventory consists of merchandise held for resale at the city -owned Hi -Way Liquors store. I. Prepaid Items Payments to vendors for services that will benefit future accounting periods are recorded as prepaid. Prepaid items are accounted for using the consumption method. Fund balance in an amount equal to the prepaid balance in the related funds is not available for appropriation, and is, therefore, classified as nonspendable. J. Notes Receivable Notes receivable consist of loans made by the city to area businesses for development or redevelopment purposes. The terms and interest rates of the individual loans vary. Notes receivable are offset by deferred inflows of resources in the governmental funds. K. Land Held for Resale Land held for resale is recorded in the governmental fund which purchased it at the lower of cost or acquisition value. Fund balances are reported as restricted or assigned in an amount equal to the land's carrying value is reported in the governmental funds as these assets are not available for appropriation. 35 Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2018 L. Capital Assets Capital assets, which include property, plant, equipment, and infrastructure assets (roads, bridges, sidewalks, and similar items) are reported in the applicable governmental or business -type activities columns in the government - wide financial statements. Such assets are capitalized at historical cost or estimated historical cost for assets where actual historical cost is not available. Donated capital assets are recorded at their estimated acquisition value at the date of donation. The city's capitalization policy divides each asset into a class with a related threshold as follows: Class of Asset Threshold Level Land $1 Land improvements $50,000 Building/building improvements $20,000 Primary infrastructure and utility $75,000 Secondary infrastructure $25,000 Equipment $10,000 Software and non -tangible $10,000 The cost of normal maintenance and repairs that does not add to the value of the asset or materially extend asset lives is not capitalized. The city has elected to fully capitalize the infrastructure capital assets of its governmental activities regardless of their acquisition date or amount. Capital assets are recorded in the government -wide and proprietary fund financial statements but are not reported in the governmental funds financial statements. Interest incurred during the construction phase of capital assets for business -type activities is included as part of the capitalized value of the assets constructed. Capital assets are depreciated using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives. Since surplus assets are generally sold for an immaterial amount when no longer needed for city purposes, no salvage value is taken into consideration for depreciation purposes. Useful lives vary from 10 to 40 years for infrastructure; 5 to 20 years for vehicles, machinery, and furniture and equipment; 12 to 40 years for buildings; and 10 to 20 years for improvements other than buildings. Capital assets not being depreciated include land and construction in progress. CITY OF MONTICELLO M. Deferred Outflows of Resources In addition to assets, the statement of net position and/or balance sheet will sometimes report a separate section for deferred outflows of resources. This separate financial statement element represents a consumption of net position that applies to future periods and so will not be recognized as an outflow of resources (expense/expenditure) until that time. The city has two types of item, which arise under a full accrual basis of accounting, that qualify for reporting in this category. Accordingly, the items, deferred other post -employment benefits resources and deferred pension resources, are reported only in the statement of net position. These items result from other post -employment benefits and pension -related actuarial calculations and current year contributions made subsequent to the measurement date. N. Long -Term Liabilities In the government -wide and proprietary fund financial statements, long-term debt and other long-term obligations are reported as liabilities. Bond premiums and discounts, if material, are deferred and amortized over the life of the bonds using the straight-line method. In the fund financial statements, governmental fund types recognize bond premiums and discounts during the current period. Premiums received on debt issuances are reported as other financing sources while discounts on debt issuances are reported as other financing uses. The face amount of debt issued is reported as other financing sources. Issuance costs, whether or not withheld from the actual debt proceeds received, are reported as debt service expenditures. O. Compensated Absences Payable City employees earn vacation and sick leave or paid -time -off (PTO) based upon the number of completed years of service. The city compensates employees for unused vacation/PTO upon termination of employment. All new full-time employees receive PTO, while three employees still receive the sick leave benefit. Full-time employees who resign or leave city employment voluntarily and in good standing, after giving proper notice, shall be compensated for unused days under their respective plan. PTO is credited at the beginning of each fiscal year for existing employees and prorated for the fiscal year for new employees. Sick leave is accrued by pay period. PTO Benefit: Up to 320 hours accrued at year-end plus any current year hours earned to their date of severance multiplied by their ending hourly rate. Sick leave benefit: One-half of the unused sick leave times their hourly rate at the time of severance. 36 Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2018 All compensated absences are accrued when incurred in the government -wide and proprietary fund financial statements. The liability for governmental funds is recorded in the internal service Benefit Accrual Fund. Resignations and retirements of employees reduce the liability in the Benefit Accrual Fund or the applicable enterprise fund. P. Pensions For purposes of measuring the net pension liability, deferred outflows/inflows of resources, and pension expense, information about the fiduciary net position of the Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) and Monticello Fire Relief (FRA) and additions to/deductions from each plan's fiduciary net position have been determined on the same basis as they are reported by each plan, except that PERA's fiscal year end in June 30. For this purpose, plan contributions are recognized as of employer payroll paid dates and benefit payments and refunds are recognized when due and payable in accordance with the benefit terms. Investments are reported at fair value. The General Fund or applicable enterprise fund will be used to liquidate this liability. The PERA has a special funding situation created by a direct aid contribution made by the state of Minnesota. The direct aid is a result of the merger of the Minneapolis Employees Retirement Fund into the PERA on January 1, 2015. Q. Deferred Inflows of Resources In addition to liabilities, the statement of net position and/or balance sheet will sometimes report a separate section for deferred inflows of resources. This separate financial statement element represents an acquisition of net position that applies to future periods and so will not be recognized as an inflow of resources (revenue) until that time. The city has three types of items that qualify for reporting in this category. First, deferred pension resources, which arises under a full -accrual basis of accounting, is reported only in the statement of net position. These amounts are the result of actuarial calculations involving net differences between expected and actual economic experience, changes in actuarial assumptions, net differences between projected and actuarial earnings, and changes in proportion and are deferred and recognized as an inflow of resources in accordance with actuarial calculations. Second, deferred MSA state aid is reported. This amount is the result of an advance of state aid allocated to future periods. Third, unavailable revenue, which arises under the modified accrual basis of accounting, is reported in the governmental funds balance sheet. Governmental funds report unavailable revenue from four sources: property taxes, special assessments, notes receivable, and MSA state aid and grants. These amounts are deferred and recognized as an inflow of CITY OF MONTICELLO resources in the period the amounts become available or are allocated to the city. R. Net Position In the government -wide and proprietary fund financial statements, net position represents the difference between assets and deferred outflows of resources, and liabilities and deferred inflows of resources. Net position is displayed in three components: • Net investment in capital assets — Consists of capital assets, net of accumulated depreciation, reduced by any outstanding debt attributable to acquire capital assets. • Restricted net position — Consists of net position restricted when there are limitations imposed on their use through external restrictions imposed by creditors, grantors, or laws or regulations of other governments. • Unrestricted net position —All other net position that does not meet the definition of "net investment in capital assets" or "restricted." S. Fund Balance Classifications In the fund financial statements, governmental funds report fund balance in classifications that disclose constraints for which amounts in those funds can be spent. These classifications are as follows: • Nonspendable — Consists of amounts that are not in spendable form, such as prepaid items, inventory, and other long-term assets. • Restricted — Consists of amounts related to externally imposed constraints established by creditors, grantors, or contributors; or constraints imposed by state statutory provisions. • Committed — Consists of internally imposed constraints that are established by resolution by the city council, which is the city's highest level of decision-making authority. Those committed amounts cannot be used for any other purpose unless the city council modifies or rescinds the commitment by resolution. • Assigned — Consists of internally imposed constraints. These constraints consist of amounts intended to be used by the city for specific purposes but do not meet the criteria to be classified as 37 Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2018 restricted or committed. In governmental funds, assigned amounts represent intended uses established by the governing body itself or by an official to which the governing body delegates the authority. Pursuant to city council resolution, the council, city administrator, or finance director are authorized to establish assignments of fund balance. • Unassigned — The residual classification for the General Fund which also reflects negative residual amounts in other funds. When both restricted and unrestricted resources are available for use, it is the city's policy to first use restricted resources, then use unrestricted resources as they are needed. When committed, assigned, or unassigned resources are available for use, it is the city's policy to use resources in the following order: 1) committed, 2) assigned, and 3) unassigned. T. Budget Budgets for the General Fund and all special revenue funds are adopted on a basis consistent with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Reported budget amounts are as originally adopted or as amended by city council -approved supplemental appropriations and budget transfers. No supplemental budget amendments were adopted during the year. Budget appropriations lapse at year-end. The legal level of budgetary control is at the department level in the General Fund and at the fund level in the major special revenue funds. U. Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses/expenditures during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. V. Future Applicable Changes in Accounting Standards In November 2016 GASB issued Statement No. 83, Certain Asset Retirement Obligations. This Statement addresses accounting and financial reporting for certain asset retirement obligations (AROs). An ARO is a legally enforceable liability associated with the retirement of a tangible capital asset. A government that has legal obligations to perform future asset retirement activities related to CITY OF MONTICELLO its tangible capital assets should recognize a liability based on the guidance in this Statement. This Statement establishes criteria for determining the timing and pattern of recognition of a liability and a corresponding deferred outflow of resources for AROs and requires that recognition occur when the liability is both incurred and reasonably estimable. The determination of when the liability is incurred should be based on the occurrence of external laws, regulations, contracts, or court judgments, together with the occurrence of an internal event that obligates a government to perform asset retirement activities. Laws and regulations may require governments to take specific actions to retire certain tangible capital assets at the end of the useful lives of those capital assets, such as decommissioning nuclear reactors and dismantling and removing sewage treatment plants. Other obligations to retire tangible capital assets may arise from contracts or court judgments. Internal obligating events include the occurrence of contamination, placing into operation a tangible capital asset that is required to be retired, abandoning a tangible capital asset before it is placed into operation, or acquiring a tangible capital asset that has an existing ARO. This statement is effective for the city's fiscal year ending December 31, 2019. In June 2017, GASB issued Statement No. 87, Leases. This Statement increases the usefulness of governments' financial statements by requiring recognition of certain lease assets and liabilities for leases that previously were classified as operating leases and recognized as inflows of resources or outflows of resources based on the payment provisions of the contract. It establishes a single model for lease accounting based on the foundational principle that leases are financings of the right to use an underlying asset. Under this Statement, a lessee is required to recognize a lease liability and an intangible right -to -use lease asset, and a lessor is required to recognize a lease receivable and a deferred inflow of resources, thereby enhancing the relevance and consistency of information about governments' leasing activities. This statement is effective for the city's fiscal year ending December 31, 2020. In April 2018, GASB issued Statement No. 88, Certain Disclosures Related to Debt, Including Direct Borrowings and Direct Placements. This Statement defines debt for purposes of disclosure in notes to financial statements as a liability that arises from a contractual obligation to pay cash (or other assets that may be used in lieu of cash) in one or more payments to settle an amount that is fixed at the date the contractual obligation is established. This Statement requires that additional essential information related to debt be disclosed in notes to financial statements, including unused lines of credit; assets pledged as collateral for the debt; and terms specified in debt agreements related to significant events of default with finance -related consequences, significant termination events with finance -related consequences, and significant subjective acceleration clauses. This statement is effective for the city's fiscal year ending December 31, 2019. 38 Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2018 In June 2018, GASB issued Statement No. 89, Accounting for Interest Costs Incurred Before the End of a Construction Period. This Statement establishes accounting requirements for interest cost incurred before the end of a construction period. Such interest cost includes all interest that previously was accounted for in accordance with the requirements of paragraphs 5-22 of Statement No. 62, Codification of Accounting and Financial Reporting Guidance Contained in Pre -November 30, 1989 FASB and AICPA Pronouncements, which are superseded by this Statement. This Statement requires that interest cost incurred before the end of a construction period be recognized as an expense in the period in which the cost is incurred for financial statements prepared using the economic resources measurement focus. As a result, interest cost incurred before the end of a construction period will not be included in the historical cost of a capital asset reported in a business -type activity or enterprise fund. This Statement also reiterates that in financial statements prepared using the current financial resources measurement focus, interest cost incurred before the end of a construction period should be recognized as an expenditure on a basis consistent with governmental fund accounting principles. This statement is effective for the city's fiscal year ending December 31, 2020. In August 2018, GASB issued Statement No. 90, Majority Equity Interest — an Amendment of GASB Statements No. 14 and No. 61. This statement defines a majority equity interest and specifies that a majority equity interest in a legally separate organization should be reported as an investment if a government's holding of the equity interest meets the definition of an investment. A majority equity interest that meets the definition of an investment should be measured using the equity method, unless it is held by a special-purpose government engaged only in fiduciary activities, a fiduciary fund, or an endowment (including permanent and term endowments) or permanent fund. Those governments and funds should measure the majority equity interest at fair value. For all other holdings of a majority equity interest in a legally separate organization, a government should report the legally separate organization as a component unit, and the government or fund that holds the equity interest should report an asset related to the majority equity interest using the equity method. This Statement establishes that ownership of a majority equity interest in a legally separate organization results in the government being financially accountable for the legally separate organization and, therefore, the government should report that organization as a component unit. This Statement also requires that a component unit in which a government has a 100 percent equity interest account for its assets, deferred outflows of resources, liabilities, and deferred inflows of resources at acquisition value at the date the government acquired a 100 percent equity interest in the component unit. Transactions presented in statements of the component unit in that circumstance should include only transactions that occurred subsequent to the acquisition. This statement is effective for the city's fiscal year ending December 31, 2019. CITY OF MONTICELLO NOTE 2. CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS, AND INVESTMENTS A. Components of Cash and Investments Cash and investments at year-end consist of the following: Deposits Investments $ 12,956,548 30,507,281 Cash on hand 8,165 Total cash and investments — Statement of Net Position $ 43,471,994 B. Deposits In accordance with applicable Minnesota Statutes, the city maintains deposits at depository banks authorized by the city council, including checking accounts and non-negotiable certificates of deposit. The following is considered the most significant risk associated with deposits. Custodial Credit Risk — In the case of deposits, this is the risk that in the event of a bank failure, the city's deposits may be lost. Minnesota Statutes require that all deposits be protected by federal deposit insurance, corporate surety bond, or collateral. The fair value of collateral pledged must equal 110% of the deposits not covered by federal deposit insurance or corporate surety bonds. Authorized collateral includes treasury bills, notes, and bonds; issues of U.S. government agencies; general obligations rated "A" or better; revenue obligations rated "AX or better; irrevocable standard letters of credit issued by the Federal Home Loan Bank; and certificates of deposit. Minnesota Statutes require that securities pledged as collateral be held in safekeeping in a restricted account at the Federal Reserve Bank or in an account at a trust department of a commercial bank or other financial institution that is not owned or controlled by the financial institution furnishing the collateral. The city's investment policy does not provide further requirements regarding custodial credit risk. At year-end, the carrying amount of the city's deposits was $12,956,548 while the balance on bank records was $13,698,219. All deposits were covered by federal depository insurance, surety bonds, or by collateral held by the city's agent in the city's name. 39 Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2018 C. Investments Custodial Credit Risk — For investments, this is the risk that in the event of a failure of the counterparty to an investment transaction (typically a broker-dealer) the city would not be able to recover the value of its investments or collateral securities that are in the possession of an outside party. The city's investment policy does not provide additional requirements beyond state statutes, but the city typically limits its exposure by purchasing insured or registered investments, or by the control of who holds the securities. Credit Risk — This is the risk that an issuer or other counterparty to an investment will not fulfill its obligations. Minnesota Statutes limit the city's investments to direct obligations or obligations guaranteed by the United States or its agencies; shares of investment companies registered under the Federal Investment Company Act of 1940 that receive the highest credit rating, are rated in one of the two highest rating categories by a statistical rating agency, and all of the investments have a final maturity of 13 months or less; general obligations rated "A" or better; revenue obligations rated "AX or better; general obligations of the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency rated "A" or better; bankers' acceptances of United States banks eligible for purchase by the Federal Reserve System; commercial paper issued by United States corporations or their Canadian subsidiaries, rated of the highest quality category by at least two nationally recognized rating agencies, and maturing in 270 days or less; Guaranteed Investment Contracts guaranteed by a United States commercial bank, domestic branch of a foreign bank, or a United States insurance company, and with a credit quality in one of the top two highest categories; repurchase or reverse purchase agreements and securities lending agreements with financial institutions qualified as a "depository" by the government entity, with banks that are members of the Federal Reserve System with capitalization exceeding $10,000,000; that are a primary reporting dealer in U.S. government securities to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York; or certain Minnesota securities broker-dealers. The city's investment policy does not further address credit risk. CITY OF MONTICELLO Concentration Risk— This is the risk associated with investing a significant portion of the city's investment (5% or more) in the securities of a single issuer, excluding U.S. guaranteed investments (such as treasuries), investment pools, and mutual funds. The city's investment policy requires that no more than 5% of the overall portfolio may be invested in the securities of a single issuer, except for the securities of the U.S. government and in agencies or an external investment pool. More than 5% of the city's total investments are invested with the Federal Home Loan Bank. These investments are 6.2% of the city's total investments. Interest Rate Risk — This is the risk of potential variability in the fair value of fixed rate investments resulting from changes in interest rates (the longer the period for which an interest rate is fixed, the greater the risk). The city's investment policy does not further address the duration of investments. The Minnesota Municipal Money Market Fund (4M Fund) is a common-law trust organized in accordance with the Minnesota Joint Powers Act, which invests only in investment instruments allowable under Minnesota Statutes. It is an external investment pool regulated by Minnesota statutes and the Board of Directors of the League of Minnesota Cities. The 4M Fund is not registered with the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC), but it follows the same regulatory rules of the SEC. The fair value of the city's position in the pool is the same as the value of the pool shares. The 4M Fund does not have any restrictions on participant withdrawals. The city's investment in the 4M Fund is measured at the net asset value per share provided by the pool, which is based on an amortized cost method that approximates fair value. The city's cash management and investment policy complies with all statutory requirements. D. Cash on hand Cash on hand consists of cash in the possession of the city, including petty cash and change funds. 40 Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2018 CITY OF MONTICELLO The following schedule provides information on credit and interest rate risks by investment type for the city's investments at December 31, 2018 N/R — Not Rated N/A — Not Applicable Percent of Holdings 2.1% 2.4% 6.2% 1.6% 1.3% 34.4% 6.7% 5.8% 3.0% 1.5% 33.1% 1.8% 100.0% 41 Credit Risk Interest Risk - Maturity Duration in Years Fair Value Measurements Less More Investment Type Rating Agency Using Than 1 1 to 5 5 to 10 Than 10 Total U.S. agency securities Federal Farm Credit Bank AA+ S&P Level 2 $ 209,897 $ - $ 441,476 $ - $ 651,373 Federal Agriculture Mortgage Corporation N/R N/A Level - - - 722,037 722,037 Federal Home Loan Bank AA+ S&P Level 2 298,320 771,454 - 827,006 1,896,780 Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation AA+ S&P Level - 498,130 - - 498,130 Federal National Mortgage Association AA+ S&P Level 198,856 - 197,490 - 396,346 Negotiable certificates of deposit N/R N/A Level 2 3,699,317 6,108,805 681,832 - 10,489,954 Local government securities AAA S&P Level 2 - 136,591 - 1,922,316 2,058,907 Local government securities Aaa Moody's Level 2 - - - 1,771,757 1,771,757 Local government securities Aa Moody's Level 2 - - 141,077 781,868 922,945 Local government securities A Moody's Level 2 - 466,949 - - 466,949 Investment pools and mutual funds N/R N/A Amortized Cost 10,086,214 - - - 10,086,214 Investment pools and mutual funds AAA S&P Amortized Cost 545,889 - - - 545,889 Total investments $15,038,493 $7,981,929 $1,461,875 $6,024,984 $30,507,281 N/R — Not Rated N/A — Not Applicable Percent of Holdings 2.1% 2.4% 6.2% 1.6% 1.3% 34.4% 6.7% 5.8% 3.0% 1.5% 33.1% 1.8% 100.0% 41 Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2018 CITY OF MONTICELLO NOTE 3. CAPITAL ASSETS Capital asset activities for the year end December 31, 2018 are as follows: January 1, Transfers and December 31, Beginning Completed Ending Internal Service Govemmental Internal Service Govemmental Balance Additions Deletions Construction Balance Fund Assets Funds Total Fund Additions Fund Additions Governmental activities Nondepreciable capital assets: Land $10,610,630 $ 297,420 $ $ - $10,908,050 $ $10,908,050 $ $ 297,420 Construction in progress 2,458,275 9,256,677 (2,051,841) 9,663,111 9,663,111 7,204,836 Total capital assets, not depreciated 13,068,905 9,554,097 (2,051,841) 20,571,161 20,571,161 7,502,256 Depreciable capital assets: Buildings and systems 100,225,314 323,131 2,051,841 102,600,286 102,600,286 2,374,972 Machinery and equipment 5,951,126 212,681 (41,350) - 6,122,457 1,700,260 4,422,197 186,555 26,126 Total capital assets, depreciated 106,176,440 535,812 (41,350) 2,051,841 108,722,743 1,700,260 107,022,483 186,555 2,401,098 Less accumulated depreciation for: Buildings and systems (53,125,908) (3,925,468) - - (57,051,376) - (57,051,376) - (3,925,468) Machinery and equipment (4,154,657) (270,461) 41,350 (4,383,768) (492,892) (3,890,876) (171,636) (98,825) Total accumulated depreciation (57,280,565) (4,195,929) 41,350 (61,435,144) (492,892) (60,942,252) (171,636) (4,024,293) Net capital assets, depreciated 48,895,875 (3,660,117) - 2,051,841 47,287,599 1,207,368 46,080,231 14,919 (1,623,195) Total governmental activities $61,964,780 $ 5,893,980 $ - $ - $67,858,760 $ 1,207,368 $66,651,392 $ 14,919 $ 5,879,061 Business -type activities Nondepreciable capital assets: Land $ 1,197,945 $ - $ (467,250) $ - $ 730,695 Construction in progress 160,000 - (160,000) - Total capital assets, not depreciated 1,357,945 - (467,250) (160,000) 730,695 Depreciable capital assets: Buildings and systems 84,014,822 1,121,577 (41,140) 160,000 85,255,259 Machinery and equipment 2,971,727 516,390 - 3,488,117 Total capital assets, depreciated 86,986,549 1,637,967 (41,140) 160,000 88,743,376 Less accumulated depreciation for: Buildings and systems (42,337,730) (2,010,506) 28,286 - (44,319,950) Machinery and equipment (1,760,070) (124,330) - (1,884,400) Total accumulated depreciation (44,097,800) (2,134,836) 28,286 (46,204,350) Net capital assets, depreciated 42,888,749 (496,869) (12,854) 160,000 42,539,026 Total business -type activities $44,246,694 $ (496,869) $ (480,104) $ - $43,269,721 42 Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2018 Depreciation for the year ended December 31, 2018 was charged to functions/programs as follows: Governmental activities General government $ 38,333 Public safety Contract 59,422 Public works Fund 3,383,343 Recreation and culture To -Date 543,195 Capital assets held by the City's internal service funds — HVAC Upgrades $ 303,870 charged to the various functions based on usage of assets $ 217,267 171,636 Total depreciation expense — governmental activities $ 4,195,929 Business -type activities Capital projects Fallon Avenue Overpass Water $ 519,200 Sewage Chelsea Rd Street & Utility 1,183, 540 Liquor 28,893 Fiber Optics 2,365,246 398,798 Deputy Registrar Nonmajor 4,405 Total depreciation expense — business -type activities $ 2,134,836 NOTE 4. COMMITMENTS During fiscal 2018, the city awarded contracts for various construction and remodeling projects. The city's commitments for uncompleted work on these contracts at December 31, 2018 are approximately as follows: $ 8,800,863 $ 7,805,546 $ 995,317 NOTE 5. LONG-TERM LIABILITIES A. Description The city has the following types of long-term liabilities outstanding at December 31, 2018: • General Obligation Bonds — The one general obligation bond issue financed a settlement with telecommunication revenue bondholders and capital equipment purchases in the Central Equipment Fund. CITY OF MONTICELLO • General Obligation Certificates of Indebtedness — The city issued general obligation certificates of indebtedness to provide financing for capital equipment. Debt service is covered by general property taxes. General obligation certificates of indebtedness are direct obligations that pledge the full faith and credit of the city. • Special Assessment Bonds — These bonds are payable primarily from special assessments levied on the properties benefiting from the improvements funded by these issues. Any deficiencies in revenue to fund these issues will be provided from general property taxes. Tax Abatement Bonds — The principal balances on these bonds are payable primarily from a special tax abatement levy, and interest is paid from general property taxes. • General Obligation Revenue Bonds — The outstanding general obligation revenue bond financed improvements to the city's sewer system. They will be repaid from revenues pledged and are backed by the taxing power of the city. Net operating revenues were $2,581,833 and principal and interest payments were $244,798 for a percentage of revenues of 9.48%. PFA Loan — This loan was issued for improvements to the wastewater treatment plant and is payable primarily from user fees which benefit from the improvements. • Compensated Absences — The city provides vacation and sick or paid -time -off (PTO) leave benefits to eligible employees. The liability will be repaid by the Benefit Accrual fund or respective enterprise fund for which each employee is employed. • Total OPEB Liability— The city provides post -employment benefits to certain eligible employees through the city's OPEB Plan. The liability will be repaid based on a pay-as-you-go financing requirement from the General fund or applicable enterprise fund. Net Pension Liability —City employees participate in one state-wide, multiple -employer, defined benefit pension plan administered by the Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) per Minnesota state statute. The liability reflects the city's portion of the total net pension liability of the PERA plan based on a percentage of contributions into the plan. Volunteer fire fighters participate in a single -employer defined benefit plan administered by the Monticello Fire Relief Association (FRA). The liability will be repaid by the General fund or applicable enterprise fund. 43 Amount Contract Paid Remaining Fund Project Description Amount To -Date 12/31/2018 Community HVAC Upgrades $ 303,870 $ 86,603 $ 217,267 Center Capital projects Fallon Avenue Overpass 5,934,767 5,452,790 481,977 Capital projects Chelsea Rd Street & Utility Improvements 2,365,246 2,078,013 287,233 Nonmajor governmental Street Lighting Updates 196,980 188,140 8,840 $ 8,800,863 $ 7,805,546 $ 995,317 NOTE 5. LONG-TERM LIABILITIES A. Description The city has the following types of long-term liabilities outstanding at December 31, 2018: • General Obligation Bonds — The one general obligation bond issue financed a settlement with telecommunication revenue bondholders and capital equipment purchases in the Central Equipment Fund. CITY OF MONTICELLO • General Obligation Certificates of Indebtedness — The city issued general obligation certificates of indebtedness to provide financing for capital equipment. Debt service is covered by general property taxes. General obligation certificates of indebtedness are direct obligations that pledge the full faith and credit of the city. • Special Assessment Bonds — These bonds are payable primarily from special assessments levied on the properties benefiting from the improvements funded by these issues. Any deficiencies in revenue to fund these issues will be provided from general property taxes. Tax Abatement Bonds — The principal balances on these bonds are payable primarily from a special tax abatement levy, and interest is paid from general property taxes. • General Obligation Revenue Bonds — The outstanding general obligation revenue bond financed improvements to the city's sewer system. They will be repaid from revenues pledged and are backed by the taxing power of the city. Net operating revenues were $2,581,833 and principal and interest payments were $244,798 for a percentage of revenues of 9.48%. PFA Loan — This loan was issued for improvements to the wastewater treatment plant and is payable primarily from user fees which benefit from the improvements. • Compensated Absences — The city provides vacation and sick or paid -time -off (PTO) leave benefits to eligible employees. The liability will be repaid by the Benefit Accrual fund or respective enterprise fund for which each employee is employed. • Total OPEB Liability— The city provides post -employment benefits to certain eligible employees through the city's OPEB Plan. The liability will be repaid based on a pay-as-you-go financing requirement from the General fund or applicable enterprise fund. Net Pension Liability —City employees participate in one state-wide, multiple -employer, defined benefit pension plan administered by the Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) per Minnesota state statute. The liability reflects the city's portion of the total net pension liability of the PERA plan based on a percentage of contributions into the plan. Volunteer fire fighters participate in a single -employer defined benefit plan administered by the Monticello Fire Relief Association (FRA). The liability will be repaid by the General fund or applicable enterprise fund. 43 Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2018 Long-term liabilities at year-end are summarized as follows B. Changes in Long -Term Liabilities Governmental activities General obligation bonds Certificates of indebtedness Special assessment bonds Tax abatement bonds Add premiums on bonds Less discounts on bonds Compensated absences Total OPEB liability Net pension liability - PERA Net pension liability - FRA Total governmental activities Business -type activities General obligation revenue bonds PFA loans Add premiums on bonds Compensated absences Total OPEB liability Net pension liability - PERA Total business -type activities (1) See Note 14. CITY OF MONTICELLO January 1, 2018 December 31, Due Within as restated (1) Additions Retirements 2018 One Year $ 5,785,000 $ $ (410,000) $ 5,375,000 $ 415,000 200,000 (65,000) 135,000 65,000 12,695,000 (1,770,000) 10,925,000 2,045,000 2,960,000 5,000,000 (160,000) 7,800,000 450,000 144,665 40,882 (66,041) 119,506 - (16,329) - 2,600 (13,729) - 249,377 262,540 (236,641) 275,276 155,977 200,039 24,251 (4,216) 220,074 - 2,593,537 212,149 (547,816) 2,257,870 (131,561) 289,997 (72,795) 85,641 $ 24,679,728 $5,829,819 $(3,329,909) $27,179,638 $3,130,977 $ 2,280,000 $ - $ (185,000) $ 2,095,000 $ 185,000 1,998,402 6,747 (102,149) 1,903,000 103,000 23,495 - (1,985) 21,510 - 95,722 77,641 (84,738) 88,625 50,219 81,706 9,905 (1,722) 89,889 - 911,243 74,538 (192,476) 793,305 $ 5,390,568 $ 168,831 $ (568,070) $ 4,991,329 $ 338,219 44 Final Original Interest Maturity Balance - Issue Rate % Issue Date Date End of Year Governmental activities General obligation bonds 2014A General obligation bonds: judgment portion $ 6,080,000 1.00 - 3.50 % 12/18/2014 12/15/2030 $ 5,025,000 equipment portion 515,000 1.00-3.05 12/18/2014 12/15/2024 350,000 Other general obligation debt 2013A Certificate of indebtedness 500,000 0.35-2.10 04/26/2013 12/01/2020 135,000 Special assessments bonds 2010A General obligation refunding and improvement bonds 3,255,000 0.40-2.70 09/14/2010 02/01/2021 870,000 2011A General obligation refunding bonds 10,735,000 2.00-3.00 10/19/2011 02/01/2023 1,995,000 2015B General obligation bonds 2,605,000 1.50-3.00 11/05/2015 12/15/2030 2,150,000 2016A General obligation bonds 4,900,000 2.00-3.00 11/21/2016 12/15/2030 4,050,000 2017A General obligation bonds 2,040,000 2.00-2.50 10/24/2017 12/15/2027 1,860,000 Tax abatement bonds 2017A General obligation bonds 2,960,000 2.00-3.00 10/24/2017 12/15/2032 2,800,000 2018A General obligation bonds 5,000,000 3.00-3.38 10/23/2018 12/15/2032 5,000,000 Net premiums (discounts) on bonds 105,777 Compensated absences payable 275,276 Total OPEB liability 220,074 Net pension liability - PERA 2,257,870 Net pension liability - FRA 85,641 Total governmental activities $27,179,638 Business -type activities General obligation revenue bonds 2013B Wastewater treatment bonds 3,000,000 2.00-3.35 12/05/2013 12/01/2028 $ 2,095,000 Public Facility Authority loan (2015A) 2,391,483 1.06 09/23/2015 08/20/2035 1,903,000 Net premiums (discounts)on bonds 21,510 Compensated absences payable 88,625 Total OPEB liability 89,889 Net pension liability 793,305 Total business -type activities $ 4,991,329 B. Changes in Long -Term Liabilities Governmental activities General obligation bonds Certificates of indebtedness Special assessment bonds Tax abatement bonds Add premiums on bonds Less discounts on bonds Compensated absences Total OPEB liability Net pension liability - PERA Net pension liability - FRA Total governmental activities Business -type activities General obligation revenue bonds PFA loans Add premiums on bonds Compensated absences Total OPEB liability Net pension liability - PERA Total business -type activities (1) See Note 14. CITY OF MONTICELLO January 1, 2018 December 31, Due Within as restated (1) Additions Retirements 2018 One Year $ 5,785,000 $ $ (410,000) $ 5,375,000 $ 415,000 200,000 (65,000) 135,000 65,000 12,695,000 (1,770,000) 10,925,000 2,045,000 2,960,000 5,000,000 (160,000) 7,800,000 450,000 144,665 40,882 (66,041) 119,506 - (16,329) - 2,600 (13,729) - 249,377 262,540 (236,641) 275,276 155,977 200,039 24,251 (4,216) 220,074 - 2,593,537 212,149 (547,816) 2,257,870 (131,561) 289,997 (72,795) 85,641 $ 24,679,728 $5,829,819 $(3,329,909) $27,179,638 $3,130,977 $ 2,280,000 $ - $ (185,000) $ 2,095,000 $ 185,000 1,998,402 6,747 (102,149) 1,903,000 103,000 23,495 - (1,985) 21,510 - 95,722 77,641 (84,738) 88,625 50,219 81,706 9,905 (1,722) 89,889 - 911,243 74,538 (192,476) 793,305 $ 5,390,568 $ 168,831 $ (568,070) $ 4,991,329 $ 338,219 44 Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2018 C. Minimum Debt Payments Minimum annual principal and interest payments to maturity for bonds payable are as follows: Governmental Activities General Obligation Special Year Ending General Obligation Bonds Certificate of Indebtedness Assessment Bonds December 31, Principal Interest Principal Interest Principal Interest 2019 $ 415,000 $ 160,609 $ 65,000 $ 2,673 $ 2,045,000 $ 234,828 2020 420,000 152,931 70,000 1,470 1,195,000 201,275 2021 435,000 143,691 - - 1,220,000 176,150 2022 445,000 132,816 1,245,000 147,575 2023 455,000 120,579 1,275,000 118,425 2024-2028 2,230,000 395,594 3,410,000 287,350 2029-2033 975,000 51,690 535,000 24,300 2034-2035 - - - - Tax Abatement Bonds Principal Interest $ 450,000 $ 242,530 480,000 208,653 490,000 196,003 505,000 183,103 515,000 169,803 2,805,000 633,988 2,555,000 204,528 CITY OF MONTICELLO Business -Type Activities General Obligation Bonds PFA Loan Principal Interest Principal Interest $ 185,000 $ 56,098 $ 103,000 $ 20,229 190,000 52,398 104,000 19,134 195,000 48,598 105,000 18,028 200,000 44,405 106,000 16,912 205,000 39,705 107,000 15,786 1,120,000 108,565 553,000 61,622 - - 583,000 31,592 - 242,000 3,869 $5,375,000 $1,157,910 $ 135,000 $ 4,143 $10,925,000 $1,189,903 $ 7,800,000 $1,838,605 $2,095,000 $ 349,769 $1,903,000 $ 187,173 D. Conduit Debt The city has issued Senior Housing Refunding Revenue Bonds to provide financial assistance to private sector entities for the acquisition and construction of senior housing facilities deemed to be in the public interest. The bonds are secured by the property financed and are payable solely from payments received on the underlying mortgage loans. Upon repayment of the bonds, ownership of the acquired facilities transfers to the private sector entity served by the bond issuance. The city is not obligated in any manner for repayment of the bonds. Accordingly, the bonds are not reported as liabilities in the accompanying financial statements. As of December 31, 2018, there was one series of Senior Housing Refunding Revenue Bonds and two series of Educational Facilities Revenue Notes outstanding. The original issue of the Senior Housing Refunding Revenue Bonds totaled $3,000,000 with an interest rate of 4.75%. The original issues of the Educational Facilities Revenue Notes totaled $2,225,000 with an interest rate of 3.75%. These balances have reduced through annual payments and partial call prepayments. The outstanding balance as of December 31, 2018 is undetermined. E. Pay -As -You -Go Tax Increment Notes The city, in order to spur economic development and redevelopment, has entered into private development and redevelopment agreements to encourage developers to construct, expand, or improve new or existing properties and buildings or clean-up and redevelop blighted areas. These agreements may in substance be a tax abatement but will depend on their individual circumstances. F. Abatements The city currently has three agreements that would be considered tax abatements under GASB Statement 77: 1-22 Redevelopment activities in Downtown 1997 Downtown and 2010 District Embracing Downtown plans $ 44,920 $ 684,816 12/31/2024 1-29 Front Porch 27 townhouse housing units; Assoc owner -occupied $ 20,915 $ 147,350 12/31/2029 45 Amount of Outstanding taxes abated principal Date of during the balance at required Name Purpose fiscal year year end decertification 1-20 Prairie 22 twinhome and 8 fourplex West Townhouse housing units $ 4,491 $ - 12/31/2024 1-22 Redevelopment activities in Downtown 1997 Downtown and 2010 District Embracing Downtown plans $ 44,920 $ 684,816 12/31/2024 1-29 Front Porch 27 townhouse housing units; Assoc owner -occupied $ 20,915 $ 147,350 12/31/2029 45 Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2018 The city is authorized to create a tax increment financing plan under Minnesota Statute 469.175. The criteria that must be met under the statute are that, in the opinion of the municipality: • the proposed development or redevelopment would not reasonably be expected to occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future; and • the increased market value of the site that could reasonably be expected to occur without the use of tax increment financing would be less than the increase in the market value estimated to result from the proposed development after subtracting the present value of the projected tax increments for the maximum duration of the district permitted by the plan. The requirements of this item do not apply if the district is a housing district; • that the tax increment financing plan conforms to the general plan for the development or redevelopment of the municipality as a whole; and • that the tax increment financing plan will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the municipality as a whole, for the development or redevelopment of the project by private enterprise. The city has development agreements with private developers for properties in the city's tax increment districts. As part of the agreements, the city has agreed to reimburse the developers for certain costs through pay-as-you-go tax increment notes. These notes provide for the payment of principal equal to the developers' costs, plus interest at rates ranging from 5.0% to 8.5% (interest accrual commencing upon the developer completing the project). Payments of the notes will be made at the lesser of the scheduled note payments or the actual net tax increment received during the period specified in the agreement. The notes, classified as abatements, will be canceled at the end of the agreement term, whether it has been fully repaid or not. The outstanding principal balances as of December 31, 2018 are listed in the previous table. These notes are not included in the city's long-term debt, because repayment is required only to the extent sufficient tax increments are received. The city's position is that this is an obligation to assign future and uncertain revenue sources and is not actual debt in substance. G. Arbitrage Rebate In accordance with the provisions of Section 148(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, bonds must satisfy certain arbitrage rebate requirements. Positive arbitrage is the excess of (1) the amount earned on investments CITY OF MONTICELLO purchased with bond proceeds over (2) the amount that such investments would have earned had such investments been invested at a rate equal to the yield on the bond issue. In order to comply with the arbitrage rebates requirements, positive arbitrage must be paid to the U.S. treasury at the end of each five-year anniversary date of the bond issue. As of December 31, 2018, there are no arbitrage rebates owed. H. Revenue Pledged Future revenue pledged for the payment of long-term debt is as follows: NOTE 6. DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLANS — STATE-WIDE A. Plan Description The city participates in the General Employees Retirement Fund (GERF) cost- sharing multiple -employer defined benefit pension plan administered by the Public Employees Retirement Association of Minnesota (PERA). PERA's defined benefit pension plans are established and administered in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Chapters 353 and 356. PERA's defined benefit pension plans are tax qualified plans under Section 401 (a) of the Internal Revenue Code. General Emplovees Retirement Fund (General Emplovees Plan). All full-time and certain part-time employees of the city are covered by the General Employees Plan. General Employees Plan members belong to the Coordinated Plan. Coordinated Plan members are covered by Social Security. 46 2013B G.O. Wastewater Description Treatment Bonds PFA Loan Use of proceeds Sewage Fund Sewage Fund Revenue pledged Type Utilitycharges Utilitycharges Percent of total debt service 54% 46% Term of pledge 2013-2028 2015-2035 Remaining principal & interest $ 2,444,769 $ 2,090,173 Current year Principal and interest paid $ 244,798 $ 123,053 Pledged revenue received $ 1,394,190 $ 1,187,643 NOTE 6. DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLANS — STATE-WIDE A. Plan Description The city participates in the General Employees Retirement Fund (GERF) cost- sharing multiple -employer defined benefit pension plan administered by the Public Employees Retirement Association of Minnesota (PERA). PERA's defined benefit pension plans are established and administered in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Chapters 353 and 356. PERA's defined benefit pension plans are tax qualified plans under Section 401 (a) of the Internal Revenue Code. General Emplovees Retirement Fund (General Emplovees Plan). All full-time and certain part-time employees of the city are covered by the General Employees Plan. General Employees Plan members belong to the Coordinated Plan. Coordinated Plan members are covered by Social Security. 46 Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2018 B. Benefits Provided PERA provides retirement, disability, and death benefits. Benefit provisions are established by state statute and can only be modified by the state legislature. Vested, terminated employees who are entitled to benefits but are not receiving them yet are bound by the provisions in effect at the time they last terminated their public service. General Emplovees Plan Benefits Benefits are based on a member's highest average salary for any five successive years of allowable service, age, and years of credit at termination of service. Two methods are used to compute benefits for PERA's Coordinated Plan members. Members hired prior to July 1, 1989, receive the higher of Method 1 or Method 2 formulas. Only Method 2 is used for members hired after June 30, 1989. Under Method 1, the accrual rate for Coordinated members is 1.2% of average salary for each of the first 10 years of service and 1.7% of average salary for each additional year. Under Method 2, the accrual rate for Coordinated members is 1.7% of average salary for all years of service. For members hired prior to July 1, 1989, a full annuity is available when age plus years of service equal 90 and normal retirement age is 65. For members hired on or after July 1, 1989, normal retirement age is the age for unreduced Social Security benefits capped at 66. Benefit increases are provided to benefit recipients each January. Increases are related to the funding ratio of the plan. If the General Employees Plan is at least 90% funded for two consecutive years, benefit recipients are given a 2.5% increase. If the plan has not exceeded 90% funded, or have fallen below 80%, benefit recipients are given a one percent increase. A benefit recipient who has been receiving a benefit for at least 12 full months as of June 30, will receive a full increase. Members receiving benefits for at least one month but less than 12 full months as of June 30, will receive a pro rata increase. C. Contributions Minnesota Statutes Chapter 353 sets the rates for employer and employee contributions. Contribution rates can only be modified by the state legislature. General Emplovees Fund Contributions Coordinated Plan members were required to contribute 6.50%, of their annual covered salary in fiscal year 2018, and the city was required to contribute 7.50% for Coordinated Plan members. The city's contributions to the General Employees Fund for the year ended December 31, 2018, were $287,700. The city's contributions were equal to the required contributions as set by state statute. CITY OF MONTICELLO D. Pension Costs General Emplovees Fund Pension Costs At December 31, 2018, the city reported a liability of $3,051,175 for its proportionate share of the General Employees Fund's net pension liability. The city's net pension liability reflected a reduction due to the State of Minnesota's contribution of $16 million to the fund in 2018. The State of Minnesota is considered a non -employer contributing entity and the state's contribution meets the definition of a special funding situation. The State of Minnesota's proportionate share of the net pension liability associated with the city totaled $100,077. The net pension liability was measured as of June 30, 2018, and the total pension liability used to calculate the net pension liability was determined by an actuarial valuation as of that date. The city's proportion of the net pension liability was based on the city's contributions received by PERA during the measurement period for employer payroll paid dates from July 1, 2017, through June 30, 2018, relative to the total employer contributions received from all of PERA's participating employers. At June 30, 2018, the city's proportionate share was 0.0550% which was an increase of 0.0001% from its proportion measured as of June 30, 2017. For the year ended December 31, 2018, the city recognized pension expense of $44,577 for its proportionate share of the General Employees Fund's pension expense. In addition, the city recognized an additional $23,338 as pension expense (and grant revenue) for its proportionate share of the State of Minnesota's contribution of $16 million to the General Employees Fund. At December 31, 2018, the city reported its proportionate share of the General Employees Plan's deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources related to pensions from the following sources: 47 Deferred Outflows Deferred Inflows of Resources of Resources Differences between expected and actual econom ic experience $ 80,620 $ 95,138 Changes in actuarial assumptions 311,601 342,406 Difference between projected and actual investment earnings - 285,244 Changes in proportion 17,744 158,331 Contributions paid to PERAsubsequent to the measurementdate 145,637 - Total $ 555,602 $ 881,119 47 Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2018 $145,637 reported as deferred outflows of resources related to pensions resulting from the city's contributions subsequent to the measurement date will be recognized as a reduction of the net pension liability in the year ended December 31, 2019. Amounts reported as deferred outflows and inflows of resources related to pensions, including the contributions subsequent to the measurement date, will be recognized in pension expense as follows: Pension Yearended Expense December 31, Amount 2019 $ 214,914 2020 (231,036) 2021 (245,710) 2022 (63,685) 0.75% $ (325,517) E. Actuarial Assumptions The total pension liability in the June 30, 2018 actuarial valuation was determined using an individual entry -age normal actuarial cost method and the following actuarial assumptions: Inflation 2.50% per year Active Member Payroll Growth 3.25% per year Investment Rate of Return 7.50% Salary increases were based on a service -related table. Mortality rates for active members, retirees, survivors, and disabilitants for all plans were based on RP 2014 tables for males or females, as appropriate, with slight adjustments to fit PERA's experience. Cost of living benefit increases after retirement for retirees are assumed to be 1.25% per year for the General Employees Plan. Actuarial assumptions used in the June 30, 2018 valuation were based on the results of actuarial experience studies. The most recent six-year experience study in the General Employees Plan was completed in 2015. The following changes in actuarial assumptions occurred in the General Employees Plan in 2018: • The morality projection scale was changed from MP -2015 to MP -2017. • The assumed post-retirement benefit increase was changed from 1.0% per year through 2044 and 2.50% per year thereafter to 1.25% per year. CITY OF MONTICELLO The State Board of Investment, which manages the investments of PERA, prepares an analysis of the reasonableness on a regular basis of the long-term expected rate of return using a building-block method in which best -estimate ranges of expected future rates of return are developed for each major asset class. These ranges are combined to produce an expected long-term rate of return by weighting the expected future rates of return by the target asset allocation percentages. The target allocation and best estimates of geometric real rates of return for each major asset class are summarized in the following table: Long -Term Target Expected Real Asset Class Allocation Rate of Return Domestic Stocks 36% 5.10% International Stocks 17% 5.30% Bonds 20% 0.75% Alternative Assets 25% 5.90% Cash 2% 0.00% Total 100% F. Discount Rate The discount rate used to measure the total pension liability in 2018 was 7.50%. The projection of cash flows used to determine the discount rate assumed that contributions from plan members and employers will be made at the rates set in Minnesota Statutes. Based on these assumptions, the fiduciary net position of the General Employees Fund was projected to be available to make all projected future benefit payments of current plan members. Therefore, the long-term expected rate of return on pension plan investments was applied to all periods of projected benefit payments to determine the total pension liability. G. Pension Liability Sensitivity The following presents the city's proportionate share of the net pension liability calculated using the discount rate disclosed in the preceding paragraph, as well as what the city's proportionate share of the net pension liability would be if it were calculated using a discount rate 1 percentage point lower or 1 percentage point higher than the current discount rate: 48 Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2018 1 % Decrease 1 % Increase In Discount Discount In Discount Rate (6.50%) Rate (7.50%) Rate (8.50%) City's proportionate share of the GERF net pension liability $ 4,958,549 $ 3,051,175 $ 1,476,691 H. Pension Plan Fiduciary Net Position Detailed information about the General Employees Fund pension plan's fiduciary net position is available in a separately -issued PERA financial report that includes financial statements and required supplementary information. That report may be obtained on the Internet at www.mnpera.org. NOTE 7. PUBLIC EMPLOYEES DEFINED CONTRIBUTION PENSION PLANS — STATE-WIDE All council members of the city are covered by the Public Employees Defined Contribution Plan (PEDCP), a multiple -employer deferred compensation plan administered by PERA. However, only two of the five Council members choose to participate in the plan. The PEDCP is a tax qualified plan under Section 401(a) of the Internal Revenue Code and all contributions by or on behalf of employees are tax deferred until time of withdrawal. Plan benefits depend solely on amounts contributed to the plan plus investment earnings, less administrative expenses. Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 353D.03, specifies plan provisions, including the employee and employer contribution rates for those qualified personnel who elect to participate. An eligible elected official who decides to participate contributes 5% of salary which is matched by the elected official's employer. Employer and employee contributions are combined and used to purchase shares in one or more of the seven accounts of the Minnesota Supplemental Investment Fund. For administering the plan, PERA receives 2% of employer contributions and twenty-five hundredths of 1% (0.25%) of the assets in each member's account annually. Total contributions made by the city during fiscal year 2018 were: Contribution Amount % of Covered Payroll Required Employee Employer Employee Employer Rate $ 780 $ 780 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% CITY OF MONTICELLO NOTE 8. DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLAN - MONTICELLO FIRE RELIEF ASSOCIATION A. Plan Description All members of the Monticello Fire Department (the Department) are covered by a defined benefit plan administered by the Monticello Fire Relief Association (the Association). As of December 31, 2018, the plan covered 27 active firefighters and 6 retirees and beneficiaries. The plan is a single -employer retirement plan that is established and administered in accordance with Minnesota statute, chapter 69. The Association maintains a separate Special fund to accumulate assets to fund the retirement benefits earned by the Department's membership. Funding for the Association is derived from voluntary contributions from the city and 2% fire aid from the State of Minnesota, as well as from investment income. B. Benefits Provided Upon approval by the Board of Trustees, lump sum retirement benefits are either paid or deferred as follows: Each member who is at least 50 years of age, has retired from the fire department, has served at least 10 years of active service with such department before retirement and has been a member of the Association in good standing at least 10 years prior to such retirement, shall be entitled to a lump sum service pension in the amount of $4,200 for each year of service but not exceeding the maximum amount per year of service allowed by law for the minimum average amount of available financing per firefighter as prescribed by laws. A year of service may be prorated to twelve monthly slices, if a full year of active service is not reached. If a member of the Association shall become permanently and totally disabled, the Association shall pay the sum of $4,200 for each year the member was an active member of the Association. If a member who received a disability pension subsequently recovers and returns to active duty, the disability pension is deducted from the service pension as approved by the Board of Trustees. According to the bylaws of the Association and pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, members who retire with less than 20 years of service and have reached the age of 50 years and have completed at least 10 years of active membership are entitled to a reduced service pension not to exceed the amount calculated by multiplying the member's service pension for the completed years of service times an applicable nonforfeitable percentage. 49 Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2018 During the time a member is on deferred vested pension (not yet reached age 50), they will earn interest on the deferred benefit amount at a rate equal to the actual time weighted total rate of return as reported by the Minnesota State Auditor's Office, up to five percent, compounded annually. A deferred vested member will not be eligible for disability benefits. C. Contributions Minnesota statutes, chapters 424 and 424A authorize pension benefits for volunteer fire relief associations. Contributions by the city are determined as follows: • Normal cost for next year (increase in pension benefit obligation) • Plus estimated expenses for next year and 10% of any deficits • Less anticipated income next year and 10%of any surplus The plan is funded by fire state aid, investment earnings and, if necessary, employer contributions as specified in Minnesota statutes and voluntary city contributions (if applicable). The State of Minnesota contributed $130,874 in fire state aid to the plan on behalf of the city Fire Department for the year ended December 31, 2018, which was recorded as a revenue. Required employer contributions are calculated annually based on statutory provisions. The city's statutorily -required contributions to the plan for the year ended December 31, 2018 were $130,874. The city's contributions were equal to the required contributions as set by state statute. The city made no voluntary contributions to the plan. Furthermore, the members have no obligation to contribute to the plan. D. Actuarial Assumptions The total pension liability at December 31, 2018 was determined using the entry age cost method and the following assumptions: Retirement eligibility at 100% service pension at age 50 and 20 years of service, early vested retirement at age 50 with 10 years of service vested at 60% and increased by 4% for each additional year of service up to 20 and eligibility for deferred service pension payable at age 50 and 20 years of service. Benefit increases 2.00% per year Cost of living increases 2.00% per year Investment rate of return 4.42% 20 year municipal bond yield 3.44% CITY OF MONTICELLO E. Pension Costs At December 31, 2018, the city reported a net pension liability of $85,641 for the FRA plan. The total pension liability used to calculate the net pension liability in accordance with GASB 68 was determined by Robinson Associates LLC applying an actuarial formula to specific census data certified by the fire department as of December 31, 2018. For the year ended December 31, 2018, the Fire Department recognized pension expense of $160,792. At December 31, 2018, the fire department reported deferred outflows/inflows of resources as follows: Deferred Deferred Outflows Inflows of Resources of Resources Differences between expected and actual economic experience $ 86,382 $ 66,838 Changes in actuarial assumptions - 9,031 Net difference between projected and actual investment earnings 52,196 - $ 138,578 $ 75,869 Amounts reported as deferred outflows and inflows of resources related to pensions will be recognized in pension expense as follows: No actuarial assumptions were updated in 2018. The benefit level was increased from $3,900 to $4,200 for each year the member was active in the Association. The 4.42% long-term expected rate of return on pension plan investments was determined using a building-block method in which best estimates for expected future real rates of return (expected returns, net of inflation) were developed for 50 Pension Yearended Expense December31, Amount 2019 $ 18,021 2020 5,811 2021 7,902 2022 22,798 2023 584 Thereafter 7,593 $ 62,709 No actuarial assumptions were updated in 2018. The benefit level was increased from $3,900 to $4,200 for each year the member was active in the Association. The 4.42% long-term expected rate of return on pension plan investments was determined using a building-block method in which best estimates for expected future real rates of return (expected returns, net of inflation) were developed for 50 Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2018 each asset class using the plan's target investment allocation along with long-term return expectations by asset class. Inflation expectations were applied to derive the nominal rate of return for the portfolio. The target allocation and best estimates of arithmetic real rates of return for each major asset class are summarized in the following table: F. Changes in the Net Pension Liability Total Plan Long-term Target Expected Real Asset Class Allocation Rate of Return Cash 8.3% -0.85% Mutual funds 91.7% 3.64% 100.0% F. Changes in the Net Pension Liability Total Plan Net Pension Pension Fiduciary Liability Liability(TPL) Net Position (Asset) (a) (b) (a -b) Beginning balance 12/31/17 $ 1,154,458 $ 1,286,019 $ (131,561) Changes for the year Service cost 71,325 - 71,325 Interest on total pension liability 49,897 49,897 Change in TPL due to changes in be nefi t to rm s 74,540 74,540 Differences between actual and expected experience in measurement of TPL 94,235 - 94,235 Contributions from employer - 130,874 (130,874) Supplemental benefits reimbursed 1,000 (1,000) Net investment income (54,150) 54,150 Benefit payments (121,900) (121,900) - Administrative expenses - (4,929) 4,929 Ending balance 12/31/18 $ 1,322,555 $ 1,236,914 $ 85,641 G. Discount Rate The discount rate used to measure the total pension liability was 4.42%. The projection of cash flows used to determine the discount rate assumed that contributions to the FRA plan will be made as specified in statute. Based on that assumption and considering the funding ratio of the plan, the fiduciary net position was projected to be available to make all projected future benefit payments of current active and inactive members. Therefore, the long-term expected rate of CITY OF MONTICELLO return on pension plan investments was applied to all periods of projected benefit payments to determine the total pension liability. H. Pension Asset Sensitivity The following presents the city's net pension liability (asset) for the FRA plan, calculated using the discount rate disclosed in the preceding paragraph, as well as what the city's net pension liability (asset) would be if it were calculated using a discount rate 1 percentage point lower or 1 percentage point higher than the current discount rate: 1 % Decrease 1 % Increase In Discount Discount In Discount Rate (3.42%) Rate (4.42%) Rate (5.42%) Net Pension Liability (Asset) $ 143,236 $ 85,641 $ 39,147 I. Pension Plan Fiduciary Net Position The Association issues a publicly available financial report that includes financial statements and required supplementary information. A copy of the report may be obtained at Monticello City Hall. J. Other Pension Information The following is a summary of the net pension assets and liabilities, deferred outflows and inflows of resources, and pension expense reported for the PERA and FRA pension plans as of the year ended December 31, 2018: Deferred Deferred Net Pension Outflows of Inflows of Pension Pension Plan Liability Resources Resources Expense State-wide, mulit- employer-PERA $3,051,175 $555,602 $ 881,119 $ 67,915 Single -employer - FRA 85,641 138,578 75,869 160,792 $ 3,136,816 $ 694,180 $ 956,988 $ 228,707 51 Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2018 NOTE 9. OTHER POST -EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS (OPEB) PLAN A. Plan Description The city provides post -employment insurance benefits to certain eligible employees through its OPEB Plan, a single -employer defined benefit plan administered by the city. All post -employment benefits are based on contractual agreements with employee groups. Eligibility for these benefits is based on years of service and/or minimum age requirements. These contractual agreements do not include any specific contribution or funding requirements. The Retiree Health Plan does not issue a publicly available financial report. No plan assets are accumulated in a trust that meets the criteria in paragraph 4 of GASB Statement No. 75. B. Benefits Provided All retirees of the city upon retirement have the option understate law to continue their medical insurance coverage through the city. For members of certain employee groups, the city pays for all or part of the eligible retiree's premiums for medical and/or dental insurance from the time of retirement until the employee reaches the age of eligibility for Medicare. Benefits paid by the city differ by bargaining unit and date of hire, with some contracts specifying a certain dollar amount per month, and some covering premium costs as defined within each collective bargaining agreement. Retirees not eligible for these city -paid premium benefits must pay the full city premium rate for their coverage. The city is legally required to include any retirees for whom it provides health insurance coverage in the same insurance pool as its active employees until the retiree reaches Medicare eligibility, whether the premiums are paid by the city or the retiree. Consequently, participating retirees are considered to receive a secondary benefit known as an "implicit rate subsidy." This benefit relates to the assumption that the retiree is receiving a more favorable premium rate than they would otherwise be able to obtain if purchasing insurance on their own, due to being included in the same pool with the city's younger and statistically healthier active employees. C. Contributions The required contribution is based on projected pay-as-you-go financing requirements, with additional amounts to prefund benefits as determined periodically by the city. The city's current year required pay-as-you-go contributions to finance the benefits described in the previous section totaled $13,277. CITY OF MONTICELLO D. Membership Membership in the plan consisted of the following as of the latest actuarial valuation: Retirees and beneficiaries receiving benefits Active plan members 51 Total members 51 E. Total OPEB Liability of the City The city's total OPEB liability of $309,963 as of year-end was measured as of January 1, 2018, and was determined by an actuarial valuation as of that date. F. Actuarial Assumption The total OPEB liability was determined by an actuarial valuation as of January 1, 2018, using the following actuarial assumptions, applied to all periods included in the measurement, unless otherwise specified: Discount rate 3.30% 20 -year municipal bond yield 3.30% Inflation rate 2.50% Salary increases 3.00% Medical trend rate 6.25% grading to 5.00% over 5 years The actuarial assumptions used in the latest valuation were based on those used to value pension liabilities for Minnesota city employees. The state pension plans base their assumptions on periodic experience studies. Economic assumptions are based on input from a variety of published sources of historical and projected future financial data. Each assumption was reviewed for reasonableness with the source information as well as for consistency with the other economic assumptions. Since the plan is not funded by an irrevocable trust, the discount rate is equal to the 20 -year municipal bond yield rate of 3.30%, which was set by considering published rate information for 20 -year high quality, tax-exempt, general obligation municipal bonds as of the measurement date. The city discount rate used in the prior measurement date was 3.50%. Mortality rates were based on the RP -2014 White Collar Mortality Tables with MP -2016 Generational Improvement Scale. Future retirees electing coverage is assumed to be 30%. 52 Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2018 G. Changes in the Total OPEB Liability Total OPEB Liability Beginning balance $ 281,745 Changes for the year Service cost 24,158 Interest 9,998 Benefit payments — employer financed (5,938) 28,218 Ending balance $ 309,963 Assumption changes since the prior measurement date include the following: • The actuarial cost method was changed from projected unit credit to entry age as prescribed by GASB 75. • The discount rate was changed from 3.50% to 3.30% H. Total OPEB Liability Sensitivity to Discount and Health -Care Cost Trend Rate Changes The following presents the total OPEB liability of the city, as well as what the city's total OPEB liability would be if it were calculated using a discount rate that is 1 percentage point lower or 1 percentage point higher than the current discount rate: OPEB discount rate Total OPEB liability $ 1% Decrease in Discount Discount Rate Rate 2.30% 330,814 $ 3.30% 309,963 $ 1% Increase in Discount Rate 4.30% 290,074 The following presents the total OPEB liability of the city, as well as what the city's total OPEB liability would be if it were calculated using healthcare cost trend rates that are 1 percentage point lower or 1 percentage point higher than the current healthcare cost trend rates: CITY OF MONTICELLO 1% Decrease in Healthcare Trend 1% Increase in Healthcare Trend Rate Rate Healthcare Trend Rate OPEB medical trend rate 5.25% decreasing to 6.25% decreasing to 7.25% decreasing to 4.00% over 5 years 5.00% over 5 years 6.00% over 5 years Total OPEB liability $ 277,631 $ 309,963 $ 347,699 I. OPEB Expense and Related Deferred Outflows of Resources and Deferred Inflows of Resources For the current year ended, the city recognized OPEB expense of $41,495. As of year-end, the city reported deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources related to OPEB from the following sources: Deferred Deferred Outflows Inflows of Resources of Resources Benefit payments after the measurement date $ 13,277 $ NOTE 10. RISK MANAGEMENT AND LITIGATION The city is exposed to various risks of losses related to torts; theft of, damage to, and destruction of assets; errors and omissions; injuries to employees; and natural disasters. For the past several years, the city has obtained insurance coverage from various trusts administered by the League of Minnesota Cities. Additionally, the city has effectively managed risk through various employee education and prevention programs. All risk management activities are accounted for in the appropriate fund. Expenditures and claims are recognized when it is probable that a loss has occurred, the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated, and the loss amount exceeds insurance coverage. In determining claims, events that might create claims, but for which none have been reported, are considered. The city attorney estimates that the amount of actual or potential claims against the city as of December 31, 2018 will not materially affect the financial condition of the city. Workers compensation coverage is provided through the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust (LMCIT). This is a group self-insured workers' compensation plan. Nearly every municipality in Minnesota participates in the 53 Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2018 plan. The city has never had to contribute any additional funds beyond the annual standard premium and deductibles, which is $2,500 per occurrence. The city's annual premium reflects a base rate multiplied by an experience modification of 100°/x. The city provides health benefit coverage to all full-time employees and certain part-time employees who meet personnel policy set criteria. The city pays a portion of the premium, which is set annually by council action, and is not obligated to make any other payments. The city also purchases property, vehicle, liability and various other insurance coverages from the LMCIT. The standard deductible for most claims is $1,000. State statute sets tort limits for most liability claims at $500,000 per individual and $1,500,000 for all claimants for one incident. Annually, the council can waive the tort limits, but has chosen not to without exception. The city periodically receives a dividend from LMCIT and has never had to contribute additional funds beyond premiums and deductibles. There were no significant reductions in insurance coverages from the previous year and there were no settlements in excess of insurance coverage in each of the past three years. NOTE 11. CLAIMS AND JUDGMENTS The city participates in a number of federal and state programs that are fully or partially funded by grants received from other governmental units. Expenditures financed by grants are subject to audit by the appropriate grantor government. If expenditures are disallowed due to noncompliance with grant program regulations, the city may be required to reimburse the grantor government. As of December 31, 2018, significant amounts of grant expenditures have not been audited by the granting agency, but the city believes that disallowed expenditures discovered in subsequent audits, if any, will not have a material effect on any of the individual funds or the overall financial position of the city. NOTE 12. CONCENTRATION OF REVENUES Cargill Kitchen Solutions is the largest customer of water and sewage services. The company's water purchases account for $82,148, or 5.7 percent, of Water Fund operating revenue; and the company's sewage charges account for $437,665, or 17.0 percent, of Sewage Fund operating revenue. Additionally, Northern States Power Company's (Xcel Energy) net tax capacity for property taxes payable in 2018 is $17,906,151, or 59.2 percent, of the total net capacity of $30,250,408. Accordingly, Xcel Energy's share of the $9.870 million city property CITY OF MONTICELLO tax levy is $5.84 million. The tax capacity on January 1, 2019, is based on market values certified to the state on January 1, 2018. In both 2013 and 2014, Xcel Energy uprated energy producing assets at its Monticello nuclear plant. However, Xcel has since experienced a decrease in plant value, contributing to the decrease in the company's net tax capacity to $16,294,278, or 55 percent, of the $29,784,556 total tax capacity for taxes payable in 2019. NOTE 13. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS In 2018, the city council approved the early pay off of the remaining $ 590,000 2010A Refunding and Improvement Bonds on February 1, 2019. These bonds had original maturity dates of February 1, 2019 and February 1, 2020. Existing reserves in the debt service fund were used to prepay the bonds. NOTE 14. CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING STANDARD During the year ended December 31, 2018, the city implemented GASB Statement No. 75, Accounting and Financial Reporting for Post -Employment Benefits Other Than Pensions. This statement included major changes in how plans and employers account for OPEB obligations. This statement established standards for recognizing and measuring liabilities, deferred outflows of resources, deferred inflows of resources, and expense/expenditures. Certain amounts necessary to fully restate fiscal year 2017 financial information are not determinable; therefore, prior year comparative amounts have not been restated. The implementation of new GASB statement in the current year resulted in the restatement of net position as of December 31, 2017. The details of the restatement are as follows: Governmental Business -type Activities Activities Total Net position — beginning, as previously reported $ 74,034,698 $ 51,849,855 $ 125,884,553 Change in accounting principle OPEB obligation, previous reporting standards 351,063 - 351,063 Total OPEB liability, current reporting standards (200,039) (81,706) (281,745) Deferred outflows of resources, current reporting standards 4,216 1,722 5,938 Total 155,240 (79,984) 75,256 Net position — beginning, as restated $ 74,189,938 $ 51,769,871 $ 125,959,809 54 Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2018 NOTE 15. INTERFUND TRANSFERS Interfund transfers for the year ended December 31, 2018 are as follows: Transfers In Transfers Out Governmental funds: General Economic Development Authority Debt Service Capital Projects Nonmajor governmental Total governmental funds Enterprise funds: Water Liquor Fiber Optics Total enterprise funds Internal service funds: Central Equipment IT Services Total internal service funds Total 116,473 249,899 1,316,473 400,000 2,082,845 130,000 130,000 300,000 300,000 $ 2,512,845 $ 700,000 200,000 5,000 277,845 1,182,845 600,000 530,000 1,130,000 200,000 200,000 $ 2,512,845 CITY OF MONTICELLO The following schedule reflects each fund transfer: Transfers In Transfers Out Amount Economic Development Authority Nonmajor governmental $ 116,473 (1) Debt Service Economic Development Authority 200,000 (2) Capital Projects 5,000 (3) Nonmajor governmental 44,899 (2) Capital Projects General 600,000 (4) Water 600,000 (4) Nonmajor governmental 116,473 (1) Nonmajor governmental Liquor 400,000 (4) Fiber Optics Liquor 130,000 (5) Central Equipment General 100,000 (4) IT Services 200,000 (4) Total $2,512,845 (1) Transferto distribute remaining unrestricted MN Investment funds. (2) Transferfor principal and interest payments on various debt issues. (3) Transferto establish funds forrepaymentof2018Abonds. (4) Transferfor project and equipment related funding. (5) Transferto subsidize fund operating and capital expenditures. 55 Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2018 NOTE 16. FUND BALANCES Classifications At December 31, 2018, a summary of the city's governmental fund balance classifications are as follows: Special Revenue Funds Economic Debt General Community Development Service Fund Center Authority Fund Nonspendable Prepaid items Restricted Debt service Economic development Tax increment Total restricted Assigned Capital improvements Economic development Community center operations Cemetery operations Total assigned Unassigned Total CITY OF MONTICELLO Capital Nonmajor Projects Funds Total $ 124,650 $ 26,702 $ 2,383 $ - $ - $ 18,529 $ 172,264 - - - 2,391,544 - - 2,391,544 - - 1,339,976 - - 873,363 2,213,339 - - 1,263,114 - - - 1,263,114 - - 2,603,090 2,391,544 - 873,363 5,867,997 4,634,992 580,093 - - 580,093 4,634,992 6,984,828 - - $ 7,109,478 $ 606,795 $ 7,240,465 7,527,500 4,369,347 11,896,847 - - 4,634,992 - 580,093 - 33,531 33,531 7,527,500 4,402,878 17,145,463 - - - 6,984,828 $ 2,391,544 $ 7,527,500 $ 5,294,770 $ 30,170,552 56 IZCITY OF MMontic110 (This page left blank intentionally) 57 y rF-wyy4�# •,i+''{+y��i� r 'r X11 ll ' 1` ..� i•I .tit.' #�f ;� � •• 14 . t X47 iti.. � �4 �I'Y � 1 1 • _ 7. J ^ � `' r x Ir LJL .! '� ..PAF - • , REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Required Supplementary Information Schedule of Employer's Share and Non -Employer Proportionate Share of Net Pension Liability - Public Employees Retirement Association Last Ten Fiscal Years General Employees Retirement Fund CITY OF MONTICELLO Note 2: Changes in Actuarial Assumptions (a) 2015 changes - The assumed post-retirement benefit increase rate was changed from 1.00 percent per year through 2030 and 2.50 percent per year thereafter to 1.00 percent per year through 2035 and 2.50 percent per year thereafter. (b) 2016 changes - The assumed post-retirement benefit increase rate was changed from 1.00 percent per year through 2035 and 2.50 percent per year thereafter to 1.00 percent per year for all future years. The assumed investment return and the single discount rate were both changed from 7.90 percent to 7.50 percent. Other assumptions were changed pursuant to the experience study dated June 30, 2015. The assumed future salary increases, payroll growth, and inflation were decreased by 0.25 percent to 3.25 percent for payroll growth and 2.50 percent for inflation. (c) 2017 changes - The Combined Service Annuity (CSA) loads were changed from 0.8 percent for active members and 60 percent for vested and non vested deferred members. The revised CSA loads are now 0.00 percent for active member liability, 15.00 percent for vested deferred member liability, and 3.00 percent for nonvested deferred member liability. The assumed post-retirement benefit increase rate was changed from 1.00 percent per year for all years to 1.00 percent per year through 2044, and 2.50 percent per year thereafter. (d) 2018 changes - The morality projection scale ws changed from MP -2015 to MP -2017. The assumed benefit increase was changed from 1.00 percent per year through 2044 and 2.50 percent per year thereafter to 1.25 percent per year. Note 3: The city implemented GASB Statement No. 68 in fiscal 2015 (using a June 30, 2015 measurement date). This schedule is intended to present 10 -year trend information. Additional years will be added as they become available. Note 4: For purposes of this schedule, covered payroll is defined as "pensionable wages." 58 Employer's PERA Employer's Employer's Employer's Proportionate Proportionate Plan Fiduciary Net Fiscal Proportion Proportionate Share of the State of Total Employer's Share of the Net Position as a Year (Percentage) of the Share (Amount) Minnesota's Proportionate Proportionate Pension Liability Percentage of the Ending Net Pension of the Net Share of the Net Pension Share of the Net as a Percentage Total Pension June 30, Liability Pension Liability Liability Pension Liability Covered Payroll of Covered Payroll Liability 2015 0.0578% $2,995,496 $0 $2,995,496 $3,395,756 88.21% 78.2% 2016 0.0588% 4,774,268 62,387 4,836,655 3,651,024 130.77% 68.9% 2017 0.0549% 3,504,780 44,041 3,548,821 3,534,506 99.16% 75.9% 2018 0.0550% 3,051,175 23,338 3,074,513 3,697,145 82.53% 79.5% Note 1: Changes in Plan Provisions. (a) 2015 changes - On January 1, 2015, the Minneapolis Employees Retirement Fund was merged into the GERF, which increased the total pension liability by $1.1 billion and increased the fiduciary plan net position by $892 million. Upon consolidation, state and employer contributions were revised; the state's contribution of $6 million, which meets the special funding situation definition, was due September 2015. (b) 2017 changes - The state's special funding contribution increased from $6 million to $16 million. Note 2: Changes in Actuarial Assumptions (a) 2015 changes - The assumed post-retirement benefit increase rate was changed from 1.00 percent per year through 2030 and 2.50 percent per year thereafter to 1.00 percent per year through 2035 and 2.50 percent per year thereafter. (b) 2016 changes - The assumed post-retirement benefit increase rate was changed from 1.00 percent per year through 2035 and 2.50 percent per year thereafter to 1.00 percent per year for all future years. The assumed investment return and the single discount rate were both changed from 7.90 percent to 7.50 percent. Other assumptions were changed pursuant to the experience study dated June 30, 2015. The assumed future salary increases, payroll growth, and inflation were decreased by 0.25 percent to 3.25 percent for payroll growth and 2.50 percent for inflation. (c) 2017 changes - The Combined Service Annuity (CSA) loads were changed from 0.8 percent for active members and 60 percent for vested and non vested deferred members. The revised CSA loads are now 0.00 percent for active member liability, 15.00 percent for vested deferred member liability, and 3.00 percent for nonvested deferred member liability. The assumed post-retirement benefit increase rate was changed from 1.00 percent per year for all years to 1.00 percent per year through 2044, and 2.50 percent per year thereafter. (d) 2018 changes - The morality projection scale ws changed from MP -2015 to MP -2017. The assumed benefit increase was changed from 1.00 percent per year through 2044 and 2.50 percent per year thereafter to 1.25 percent per year. Note 3: The city implemented GASB Statement No. 68 in fiscal 2015 (using a June 30, 2015 measurement date). This schedule is intended to present 10 -year trend information. Additional years will be added as they become available. Note 4: For purposes of this schedule, covered payroll is defined as "pensionable wages." 58 Required Supplementary Information Schedule of Employer's Pension Contributions - Public Employees Retirement Association Last Ten Fiscal Years General Employees Retirement Fund Note 1: For purposes of this schedule, covered payroll is defined as "pensionable wages." CITY OF MONTICELLO Contributions as a Percentage of Covered Payroll (b/c) 7.5% 7.5% 7.5% 7.5% Note 2: The city implemented GASB Statement No. 68 in fiscal 2015 using a June 30, 2015 measurement date. This schedule is intended to present 10 -year trend information. Additional years will be added as they become available. 59 Contributions in Relation Statutorily Required to the Statutorily Contribution Deficiency Fiscal Year Ending Contributions Required Contributions (Excess) Covered Payroll December 31, (a) (b) (a -b) (c) 2015 $ 266,042 $ 266,042 $ $ 3,547,217 2016 267,516 267,516 3,566,884 2017 269,721 269,721 3,596,280 2018 287,700 287,700 3,835,998 Note 1: For purposes of this schedule, covered payroll is defined as "pensionable wages." CITY OF MONTICELLO Contributions as a Percentage of Covered Payroll (b/c) 7.5% 7.5% 7.5% 7.5% Note 2: The city implemented GASB Statement No. 68 in fiscal 2015 using a June 30, 2015 measurement date. This schedule is intended to present 10 -year trend information. Additional years will be added as they become available. 59 CITY OF MONTICELLO Required Supplementary Information Schedule of Changes in the Fire Relief Association's Net Pension Liability (Asset) and Related Ratios Last Ten Fiscal Years Plan fiduciary net position Contributions - State 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total pension liability - - - - Service cost $ 77,343 $ 79,730 $ 66,097 $ 71,325 Interest 41,888 44,224 49,857 49,897 Changes in benefit terms - 90,761 67,016 74,540 Experience gain/(loss) (3,532) (53,156) (30,666) 94,235 Effect of changes in assumptions (27,279) 174,246 (10,673) - Benefit payments, including refund of member contributions (128,101) (1,168) (164,699) (121,900) Net change in total pension liability (8,870) 160,391 (23,068) 168,097 Total pension liability- beginning 1,026,005 1,017,135 1,177,526 1,154,458 Total pension liability- ending (A) $ 1,017,135 $ 1,177,526 $ 1,154,458 $ 1,322,555 Plan fiduciary net position Contributions - State $ 120,027 $ 123,656 $ 125,764 $ 130,874 Contributions - Municipal - - - - Supplemental benefits reimbursements 2,000 - 2,000 1,000 Net investment income (17,673) 55,902 126,579 (54,150) Benefit payments, including refund of member contributions (128,101) (1,168) (164,699) (121,900) Administrative expenses (3,532) (4,144) (4,331) (4,929) Net change in plan fiduciary net position (27,279) 174,246 85,313 (49,105) Plan fiduciary net position - beginning 1,053,739 1,026,460 1,200,706 1,286,019 Plan fiduciary net position - ending (B) $ 1,026,460 $ 1,200,706 $ 1,286,019 $ 1,236,914 Net pension liability (asset) - ending (A) -(B) (9,325) (23,180) (131,561) 85,641 Plan fiduciary net position as a percentage of the total pension liability 100.9% 102.0% 111.4% 93.5% Covered payroll' N/A N/A N/A N/A Net pension liability as a percentage of covered payroll" N/A N/A N/A N/A `The Association is comprised of volunteers, therefore, there are no payroll expenditures (i.e., there are no covered payroll percentage calculations) Note 1: Changes in Actuarial Assumptions and Benefit Terms (a) 2016 changes - The benefit level was increased from $3,300 to $3,600 per year of service. (b) 2017 changes - The annual turnover rate was changed from 10 percent to 1 percent. The discount rate was increased from 4.19% to 4.42%, which is primarily due to a reduction in the portfolio's average expense load. The benefit level was increased from $3,600 to $3,900 per year of service. (c) 2018 changes - The benefit level was increased from $3,900 to $4,200 per year of service. Note 2: The city implemented GASB Statement No. 68 in fiscal 2015 using a December 31, 2015 measurement date. This schedule is intended to present 10 -year trend information. Additional years will be added as they become available. Required Supplementary Information Schedule of Employer's Pension Contributions - Monticello Fire Department Relief Association Last Ten Fiscal Years City Contributions City Fiscal Statutorily Required Actual Contributions Contribution Deficiency Year Ending Contributions Paid (Excess) December 31, (a) (b) (a -b) 2014 $ - $ $ 2015 - 2016 - 2017 - 2018 - CITY OF MONTICELLO Non -Employer Contribution - State 2% Fire Aid $ 108,186 120,027 123,656 125,764 130,874 Note 1: The Monticello Volunteer Firemen's Relief Association is comprised of volunteers; therefore there are no payroll expenditures (i.e. there are no covered payroll percentage calculations). Note 2: The city implemented GASB Statement No. 68 in fiscal 2015 using a December 31, 2015 measurement date. This schedule is intended to present 10 -year trend information. Additional years will be added as they become available. 61 CITY OF MONTICELLO Required Supplementary Information Schedule of Changes in the City's Total OPEB Liability and Related Ratios Last Ten Fiscal Years Total OPEB liability - beginning 281,745 Total OPEB liability - ending $ 309,963 Covered payroll $ 3,130,628 Net OPEB liability as a percentage of covered payroll 10% Note 1: Changes in Actuarial Assumptions (a) 2018 changes - The discount rate was decreased from 3.5% to 3.3% Note 2: The city implemented GASB Statement No. 75 in fiscal 2018 using a January 1, 2018 measurement date. This schedule is intended to present 10 -year trend information. Additional years will be added as they become available. 62 2018 Total OPEB liability Service cost $ 24,158 Interest 9,998 Benefit payments (5,938) Net change in total OPEB liability 28,218 Total OPEB liability - beginning 281,745 Total OPEB liability - ending $ 309,963 Covered payroll $ 3,130,628 Net OPEB liability as a percentage of covered payroll 10% Note 1: Changes in Actuarial Assumptions (a) 2018 changes - The discount rate was decreased from 3.5% to 3.3% Note 2: The city implemented GASB Statement No. 75 in fiscal 2018 using a January 1, 2018 measurement date. This schedule is intended to present 10 -year trend information. Additional years will be added as they become available. 62 IZCITY OF MMontic110 (This page left blank intentionally) 63 CITY OF MONTICELLO Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance Budget and Actual - General Fund For the Year Ended December 31, 2018 (continued) 64 Original and Final Variance with Budget Actual Final Budget Revenues Property taxes $ 6,609,000 $ 6,634,769 $ 25,769 Franchise taxes 270,500 245,000 (25,500) Special assessments 300 206 (94) Licenses and permits 398,750 504,464 105,714 Intergovernmental 374,440 428,443 54,003 Charges for services 398,400 509,464 111,064 Fines and forfeitures 36,500 45,350 8,850 Investment earnings 80,000 106,767 26,767 Other revenues 119,110 215,330 96,220 Total revenues 8,287,000 8,689,793 402,793 Expenditures: Current General government Mayor and council 57,350 53,928 (3,422) City administration 448,881 449,100 219 City clerk 131,409 130,948 (461) Finance 467,242 430,924 (36,318) Audit 42,000 40,531 (1,469) City assessing 65,000 66,190 1,190 Legal 38,000 27,967 (10,033) Human resources 133,118 126,581 (6,537) Planning and zoning 248,020 239,045 (8,975) City hall 79,189 66,111 (13,078) Prairie center building 17,753 25,232 7,479 Public safety Law enforcement 1,360,197 1,362,411 2,214 Fire and rescue 414,328 435,068 20,740 Fire relief 120,000 132,874 12,874 Building inspections 399,409 351,511 (47,898) Civil defense 3,265 12,332 9,067 Animal control 51,796 46,608 (5,188) National Guard 14,500 13,649 (851) (continued) 64 CITY OF MONTICELLO Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance Budget and Actual - General Fund For the Year Ended December 31, 2018 (Continued) 65 Original and Final Variance with Budget Actual Final Budget Expenditures (continued) Public works Public works administration $ 201,955 $ 196,851 $ (5,104) Engineering 165,492 126,179 (39,313) Public works inspecitons 119,967 83,560 (36,407) Streets and alleys 1,038,451 891,117 (147,334) Ice and snow removal 292,315 344,974 52,659 Shop and garage 207,046 168,049 (38,997) Stormwater 73,465 23,883 (49,582) Street lighting 270,500 244,478 (26,022) Sanitation Refuse and recycling collection 626,544 615,586 (10,958) Transit Bus service 30,000 18,333 (11,667) Recreation and culture Senior center 103,715 103,226 (489) Park operations 918,855 916,335 (2,520) Park ballfields 26,900 21,063 (5,837) Shade tree 75,050 80,916 5,866 Public arts - 29,876 29,876 Library 45,288 48,972 3,684 Total expenditures 8,287,000 7,924,408 (362,592) Excess (deficiency) of revenues over expenditures - 765,385 765,385 Other financing sources (uses) Sale of capital assets - 15,000 15,000 Transfers out - (700,000) (700,000) Total other financing sources (uses) - (685,000) (685,000) Net change in fund balance - 80,385 80,385 Fund balance at beginning of year 7,029,093 7,029,093 - Fund balance at end of year $ 7,029,093 $ 7,109,478 $ 80,385 65 Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance Budget and Actual - Community Center Fund For the Year Ended December 31, 2018 Revenues Property taxes Charges for services Investment earnings Other revenues Total revenues Expenditures Current Recreation and culture Operations Rentals Aquatics Concessions & guest services Maintenance Programming Capital outlay Recreation and culture Maintenance Total expenditures Net change in fund balance Fund balance at beginning of year Fund balance at end of year CITY OF MONTICELLO Original and Final 436,956 Variance with Budget Actual Final Budget $ 387,000 $ 387,000 $ - 1,417,500 1,449,452 31,952 2,000 8,242 6,242 4,000 76,171 72,171 1,810,500 1,920,865 110,365 460,876 436,956 (23,920) 19,370 18,042 (1,328) 208,813 213,957 5,144 184,718 200,948 16,230 721,683 668,242 (53,441) 238,040 265,277 27,237 246,000 91,161 154,839) 2,079,500 1,894,583 184,917) (269,000) 26,282 295,282 580,513 580,513 - $ 311,513 $ 606,795 $ 295,282 Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance Budget and Actual - Economic Development Authority Fund For the Year Ended December 31, 2018 Revenues Property taxes Tax increments Investment earnings Other revenues Total revenues Expenditures Current Economic development General operations Land held for resale adjustment Developmental activities Total expenditures Excess (deficiency) of revenues over expenditures Other financing sources (uses) Transfers in Transfers out Total other financing sources (uses) Net change in fund balance Fund balance at beginning of year Fund balance at end of year CITY OF MONTICELLO Original and Final 245,904 Variance with Budget Actual Final Budget $ 323,000 $ 323,186 $ 186 635,678 638,278 2,600 48,900 43,407 (5,493) 1,100 2,832 1,732 1,008,678 1,007,703 (975) 195,000 245,904 50,904 144,000 461,513 317,513 298,866 444,399 145,533 637,866 1,151,816 513,950 370,812 (144,113) (514,925) - 116,473 116,473 (200,000) (200,000) - (200,000) (83,527) 116,473 170,812 (227,640) (398,452) 7,468,105 7,468,105 $ 7,638,917 $ 7,240,465 $ (398,452) 67 Notes to the Required Supplementary Information December 31, 2018 Budgetary Information Budgetary basis of accounting The city follows these procedures in establishing the budgetary data reflected in the basic financial statements: A. Prior to September 1, the city administrator submits to the city council a proposed operating budget for the fiscal year commencing the following January 1. The operating budget includes proposed expenditures and the means of financing them. The city council adopts the proposed budget as amended and adjusted by the city council and certifies the proposed property tax levy to the county auditor according to Minnesota Statutes. B. Public hearings are conducted at the city council's chambers in the Monticello Community Center. C. On or before December 28, the final budget is legally enacted by city council resolution and the final property tax levy is certified to the county auditor. D. Management is authorized to transfer budgeted amounts between departments within a fund; however, any revisions that alter the total expenditures of any fund must be approved by the city council. E. The city has legally adopted budgets for the General Fund and all special revenue funds. Expenditures may not legally exceed budgeted appropriations at the total fund level. Monitoring of budgets is maintained at the department level. All amounts over budget have been approved by the city council through the disbursement process. The city is not legally required to adopt an annual budget for the nonmajor special revenue funds, the Debt Service Fund, and the Capital Projects Funds. Project - length financial plans are adopted for the Debt Service and Capital Projects Funds. F. Budgets are adopted on a basis consistent with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Budgeted amounts are as originally adopted or amended by the city council. All annual appropriations lapse at year-end. CITY OF MONTICELLO Excess of expenditures over appropriations For the year ended December 31, 2018, expenditures exceeded appropriations in the Economic Development Authority special revenue fund by $513,950. The excess of expenditures resulted from purchases of parcels for redevelopment that were not included in the budget. Fund balance reserves were used to fund the expenditures. Monticello ME AA IL KZ • `� 4r' � -fir NONMAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS L �4 7TT�e F NONMAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS are used to account for revenue derived from specific taxes or other earmarked revenue sources (other than for major capital projects) that are restricted by law or administrative action to expenditures for specified purposes. Minnesota Investment Fund - Established to account for the administration of loans to local businesses while following state and federal guidelines. Cemetery Fund— Established to account for the activities of cemetery operations. The city maintains two cemeteries: Riverside and Hillside. CDBG Revitalization Fund — Established to account for funding and activities for the CDBG Revitalization Grant. CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS are used to account for resources used for the acquisition and construction of capital assets by the city, except for those financed by proprietary funds. Storm SewerAccess Fund — This fund was established to account for fees collected from building permits for new construction and lot development. The fees will finance major improvements to the city's storm sewer system. City Street Reconstruction Fund— This fund was established to account for annual improvements to the city's infrastructure based on a reconstruction schedule. Street Lighting Improvement Fund — This fund was established to account for activities incorporating street lighting into designated areas throughout the city. A portion of the city's electric franchise fee is the main revenue source for this fund. Park and Pathway Dedication Fund — This fund was established to account for restricted fees collected from developers for park land acquisition and for park and pathway improvements. The fund also accumulates resources from other sources used for the same purposes. CITY OF MONTICELLO Combining Balance Sheet Nonmajor Governmental Funds December 31, 2018 LIABILITIES Accounts and contracts payable $ - $ 1,182 $ - $ - $ - $ 10,675 $ 24,727 $ 36,584 DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES Unavailable revenue - notes receivable Special Revenue Funds 89,279 - - FUND BALANCES Capital Project Funds Nonspendable - 18,529 - - - Restricted for economic development 872,983 - 380 - - City Street Street Park & Assigned for cemetery operations - 33,531 Minnesota Total fund balances 872,983 CDBG - Storm Sewer Recon- Lighting Pathway resources, and fund balances $ 872,983 $ 53,242 Investment Cemetery Revitalization Access struction Improvement Dedication Total ASSETS Cash and investments $ 872,983 $ 34,713 $ 380 $ 1,358,936 $ 1,711,361 $ 495,212 $ 721,192 $ 5,194,777 Receivables Accounts - - - - - 118,048 - 118,048 Prepaid items 18,529 - - - - - 18,529 Notes receivable - - 89,279 - - - - 89,279 Total assets $ 872,983 $ 53,242 $ 89,659 $ 1,358,936 $ 1,711,361 $ 613,260 $ 721,192 $ 5,420,633 LIABILITIES Accounts and contracts payable $ - $ 1,182 $ - $ - $ - $ 10,675 $ 24,727 $ 36,584 DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES Unavailable revenue - notes receivable - 89,279 - - FUND BALANCES Nonspendable - 18,529 - - - Restricted for economic development 872,983 - 380 - - Assigned for capital improvements - - - 1,358,936 1,711,361 Assigned for cemetery operations - 33,531 - - - Total fund balances 872,983 52,060 380 1,358,936 1,711,361 Total liabilities, deferred inflows of resources, and fund balances $ 872,983 $ 53,242 $ 89,659 $ 1,358,936 $ 1,711,361 89,279 18,529 - - 873,363 602,585 696,465 4,369,347 - - 33,531 602,585 696,465 5,294,770 $ 613,260 $ 721,192 $ 5,420,633 Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance Nonmajor Governmental Funds For the Year Ended December 31, 2018 Revenues Franchise taxes Charges for services Investment earnings Other revenues Total revenues Expenditures Current Public works Recreation and culture Economic development Capital outlay Public works Recreation and culture Total expenditures Excess (deficiency) of revenues over expenditures Other financing sources (uses) Transfers in Transfers out Total other financing sources (uses) Net change in fund balance Fund balance at begining of year Fund balance at end of year CITY OF MONTICELLO Special Revenue Funds Capital Project Funds City Street Street Park & Minnesota CDBG - Storm Sewer Recon- Lighting Pathway Investment Cemetery Revitalization Access struction Improvement Dedication Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ 122,259 $ - $ 122,259 - 19,086 - 101,363 - 18,997 139,446 10,207 528 11 15,899 19,573 8,093 10,688 64,999 - - - - - 8,136 - 8,136 10,207 19,614 11 117,262 19,573 138,488 29,685 334,840 - - - 214 - - - 214 - 18,501 - 12,185 30,686 58,237 - - - 58,237 - 378,874 - 378,874 - - - - 229,137 229,137 58,237 18,501 - 214 - 378,874 241,322 697,148 (48,030) 1,113 11 117,048 19,573 (240,386) (211,637) (362,308) - - - - - 400,000 400,000 232,946) - 44,899) - (277,845) 232,946) - - 44,899) 400,000 122,155 (280,976) 1,113 11 117,048 (25,326) (240,386) 188,363 (240,153) 1,153,959 50,947 369 1,241,888 1,736,687 842,971 508,102 5,534,923 $ 872,983 $ 52,060 $ 380 $ 1,358,936 $ 1,711,361 $ 602,585 $ 696,465 $ 5,294,770 70 3` .yL _ ♦ Im INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS dp a' yq L �4 7TT�e F INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS are used to account for the financing of centralized services to city departments on a cost -reimbursement basis (including depreciation). Benefit Accrual Fund — This fund was established to account for resources accumulated to satisfy paid -time -off (PTO) and sick leave liabilities of governmental fund employees. Central Equipment Fund— This fund was established to account for equipment purchases and rental to various governmental fund departments. Information Technology (IT) Services Fund — This fund was established to account for the accumulation and distribution of various IT related costs, including communications, software support, capital and non -capital equipment, and software purchases. Combining Statement of Net Position Internal Service Funds December 31, 2018 ASSETS Current assets Cash and investments Accounts receivable Total current assets Noncurrent assets Capital assets Machinery and equipment Less accumulated depreciation Total noncurrent assets TOTAL ASSETS LIABILITIES Current liabilities Accounts payable Accrued interest payable Bonds payable due within one year Compensated absences due within one year Total current liabilities Noncurrent liabilities Bonds payable, net current portion Compensated absences payable Total noncurrent liabilities TOTAL LIABILITIES NET POSITION Net investment in capital assets Unrestricted TOTAL NET POSITION Benefit Accrual $ 286,459 286,459 286,459 155,977 155,977 119,299 119,299 275,276 11,183 $ 11,183 Central Equipment $ 652,390 652,390 1,642,088 (467,492) 1,174,596 1,826,986 596 120,000 120,596 365,000 365,000 485,596 689,596 651,794 $ 1,341,390 CITY OF MONTICELLO IT Services $ 193,351 30 193,381 58,172 (25,400) 32,772 226,153 18,721 18,721 18,721 32,772 174,660 $ 207,432 Total $ 1,132,200 30 1,132,230 1,700,260 (492,892) 1,207,368 2,339,598 18,721 596 120,000 155,977 295,294 365,000 119,299 484,299 779,593 722,368 837,637 $ 1,560,005 71 CITY OF MONTICELLO Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Net Position Internal Service Funds For the Year Ended December 31, 2018 72 Benefit Central IT Accrual Equipment Services Total Operating revenues Charges to other funds $ 25,899 $ 249,800 $ 272,902 $ 548,601 Other revenues - - 120 120 Total operating revenues 25,899 249,800 273,022 548,721 Operating expenses Personal services 25,899 - - 25,899 Materials and supplies - 31,282 31,282 Other services and charges - - 135,707 135,707 Depreciation - 163,736 7,900 171,636 Total operating expenses 25,899 163,736 174,889 364,524 Operating income - 86,064 98,133 184,197 Nonoperating revenues (expenses) Investment earnings 2,921 6,030 3,793 12,744 Interest expense - (13,365) - (13,365) Total nonoperating revenues (expenses) 2,921 (7,335) 3,793 (621) Income before capital contributions and transfers 2,921 78,729 101,926 183,576 Capital contributions - 10,199 - 10,199 Transfers in - 300,000 300,000 Transfers out - - (200,000) (200,000) Change in net position 2,921 388,928 (98,074) 293,775 Net position at beginning of year 8,262 952,462 305,506 1,266,230 Net position at end of year $ 11,183 $ 1,341,390 $ 207,432 $ 1,560,005 72 CITY OF MONTICELLO Combining Statement of Cash Flows Internal Service Funds For the Year Ended December 31, 2018 73 Benefit Central IT Accrual Equipment Services Total Cash flow from operating activities Cash received from internal services provided $ 25,899 $ 249,800 $ 273,022 $ 548,721 Cash paid to suppliers for goods and services - - (164,883) (164,883) Net cash provided by operating activities 25,899 249,800 108,139 383,838 Cash flows from noncapital financing activities Transfers from other funds - 300,000 - 300,000 Transfers to other funds - - (200,000) (200,000) Net cash provided (used) by noncapital financing activities - 300,000 (200,000) 100,000 Cash flows from capital and related financing activities Acquisition of capital assets - (164,374) (11,982) (176,356) Principal payments on long-term debt - (120,000) (120,000) Interest and fiscal charges paid on long-term debt - (13,485) (13,485) Net cash (used) by capital and related financing activities - (297,859) (11,982) (309,841) Cash flows from investing activities Interest on investments 2,921 6,030 3,793 12,744 Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 28,820 257,971 (100,050) 186,741 Cash and cash equivalents - January 1 257,639 394,419 293,401 945,459 Cash and cash equivalents - December 31 $ 286,459 $ 652,390 $ 193,351 $ 1,132,200 Reconciliation of operating income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities: Operating income (loss) $ - $ 86,064 $ 98,133 $ 184,197 Adjustments to Reconcile Operating Income (Loss) to Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities: Depreciation - 163,736 7,900 171,636 Changes in assets and liabilities: Increase (decrease) in accounts payable - - 2,106 2,106 Increase (decrease) in compensated absences 25,899 - - 25,899 Net cash provided by operating activities $ 25,899 $ 249,800 $ 108,139 $ 383,838 Schedule of noncash capital and related financing activities: Capital contributions $ - $ 10,199 $ - $ 10,199 73 IZCITY OF MMontic110 (This page left blank intentionally) 74 �All OTHER SUPPLEMENTARY SCHEDULES CITY OF MONTICELLO Schedule of Revenues (Sources) and Expenditures (Uses) General Fund For the Year Ended December 31, 2018 75 2018 Variance with 2014 2015 2016 2017 Final 2018 Final Actual Actual Actual Actual Budget Actual Budget Revenue and other sources - summary: Property taxes $ 5,527,958 $ 5,906,255 $ 6,204,429 $ 6,384,444 $ 6,609,000 $ 6,634,769 $ 25,769 Franchise taxes 216,500 216,500 263,900 250,000 270,500 245,000 (25,500) Special assessments 22,808 1,330 242 2,290 300 206 (94) Licenses and permits 378,810 461,049 668,602 600,933 398,750 504,464 105,714 Intergovernmental 320,691 354,679 389,005 429,697 374,440 428,443 54,003 Charges for services 319,477 349,601 351,702 397,570 398,400 509,464 111,064 Fines and forfeitures 1,900 42,474 30,656 36,702 36,500 45,350 8,850 Investment earnings 150,754 64,037 99,237 120,631 80,000 106,767 26,767 Other 180,104 241,721 263,783 271,078 119,110 215,330 96,220 Sales of capital assets - 30,473 11,180 1,725 - 15,000 15,000 Total Revenues & Other Sources 7,119,002 7,668,119 8,282,736 8,495,070 8,287,000 8,704,793 417,793 Revenue and other sources - detail: Property taxes Property tax - current 5,483,145 5,840,880 6,152,157 6,277,737 6,590,000 6,567,152 (22,848) Property tax - delinquent 24,140 46,786 31,704 71,029 - 46,482 46,482 Mobile home tax 17,575 15,077 16,324 17,620 15,000 18,984 3,984 Penalties and interest - taxes 3,098 3,512 4,244 18,058 4,000 2,151 (1,849) Franchise taxes Franchise taxes - electric 216,500 216,500 263,900 250,000 270,500 245,000 (25,500) Special assessments Assessment for services/projects 22,808 1,330 242 2,290 300 206 (94) Licenses and permits Liquor license 44,612 45,640 45,895 46,205 45,500 50,295 4,795 Beer license 964 1,013 1,013 1,151 1,100 1,988 888 Other business licenses & permits 3,707 2,545 5,295 6,387 4,000 6,840 2,840 Building permits 315,466 395,024 598,983 520,692 335,000 427,644 92,644 Fire sprinkler permits - 215 - - - - - Variance/conditional use permits 2,600 2,100 - 200 - - - Driveway permits 25 75 30 360 150 180 30 Mobile home permits 95 325 180 868 - 720 720 Excavation permits 3,850 6,125 7,125 6,405 4,500 7,410 2,910 Right-of-way permits 3,158 2,677 3,144 4,610 2,500 3,707 1,207 Sign/banner permits 4,025 4,135 5,694 9,355 4,500 4,815 315 Animal licenses 308 1,175 1,243 4,700 1,500 865 (635) Intergovernmental Pera increase aid 6,741 6,741 6,741 6,822 6,740 6,849 109 State highway aid - operating 111,280 125,258 131,898 134,955 125,000 155,374 30,374 (continued) 75 CITY OF MONTICELLO Schedule of Revenues (Sources) and Expenditures (Uses) General Fund For the Year Ended December 31, 2018 (Continued) 2018 Variance with 2014 2015 2016 2017 Final 2018 Final Actual Actual Actual Actual Budget Actual Budget Intergovernmental (continued) Fire department aid - operating $ 108,186 $ 120,027 $ 123,656 $ 133,813 $ 120,000 $ 130,874 $ 10,874 Police department aid - operating 63,205 66,814 68,710 70,959 66,000 71,834 5,834 County operating grant - street/highway - 19,642 55,780 26,875 19,000 27,353 8,353 County operating grant - civil defense 13,157 2,221 2,220 2,392 2,200 12,331 10,131 County operating grant - recycling 18,122 13,976 - 53,881 18,500 19,978 1,478 Operating grant -other - - - 17,000 3,850 (13,150) Charges for services Zoning/subdivision fees 1,200 1,050 - - - - - Assessment searches 8,174 11,100 12,760 10,968 7,500 10,695 3,195 Blight notice fee (1,650) 350 320 - - - - Final plat fee 250 150 - - - - - Planning administration fee 550 900 5,950 7,585 1,000 5,876 4,876 NSF fee 90 30 30 60 - 30 30 Inspection/construction fees 983 826 965 1,014 800 764 (36) Contractor licensing fee 1,825 1,075 825 320 200 290 90 Fire protections fees - townships 124,227 126,439 131,717 131,774 130,000 142,374 12,374 Fire emergency response fee 4,883 11,250 4,900 23,500 4,900 19,995 15,095 Fire - other fees 2,050 2,165 3,814 5,407 2,000 11,808 9,808 Blight mowing fees (559) 625 450 - 500 - (500) Rental housing fees 55,030 45,210 49,020 49,600 47,000 45,500 (1,500) Animal control fees 34,462 36,869 36,089 45,224 36,000 45,232 9,232 Miscellaneous pubic works 8,981 - - - - 8,621 8,621 Tree and brush removal charge 2,200 6,755 3,290 1,513 2,500 2,365 (135) Recycling bin fee - 260 - - - 30 30 Garbage fee - taxable 44,992 90,310 89,656 80,774 155,000 169,217 14,217 Garbage miscellaneous fee 17,488 - - - - - - Garbage surcharge - not taxable 2,340 240 300 - - 90 90 Field/Tourney fees 4,019 4,544 5,679 14,036 6,000 14,400 8,400 Park rental fees 5,099 6,305 4,962 5,355 5,000 9,051 4,051 Memorial program revenue - 1,404 - - - - - Developer cost reimbursement 2,843 1,744 750 19,540 16,429 16,429 General charges for services - - 225 900 - 6,697 6,697 Fines and forfeitures Court fines - 41,761 30,150 35,607 36,000 44,450 8,450 Animal impound fines 400 713 506 595 500 400 (100) Liquor license violation 1,500 - - 500 - 500 500 Investment earnings Investment earnings 145,211 64,037 99,237 120,631 80,000 106,767 26,767 Interest - loans 5,543 - - - - - - (continued) 76 CITY OF MONTICELLO Schedule of Revenues (Sources) and Expenditures (Uses) General Fund For the Year Ended December 31, 2018 (Continued) 2018 Variance with 2014 2015 2016 2017 Final 2018 Final Actual Actual Actual Actual Budget Actual Budget Other City property rental $ 1,600 $ 1,600 $ 1,600 $ 1,600 $ 1,600 $ 1,600 $ - Billboard land rental 20,146 2,150 21,149 21,187 21,000 22,881 1,881 Lease - Prairie Center 37,511 22,500 24,006 32,238 15,000 28,548 13,548 Lease - communication tower 8,000 22,180 24,905 26,441 25,000 29,213 4,213 Contributions 4,000 5,958 5,315 3,025 2,500 13,543 11,043 Sale of city property 1,994 1,831 10,650 20,948 1,000 5,724 4,724 Sale of lock boxes 855 1,368 1,710 855 800 920 120 Tree Sales 5,600 6,026 7,533 8,646 7,000 7,073 73 Copies 21 49 19 10 50 15 (35) Refunds & reimbursables 55,030 75,416 88,860 49,603 - 42,297 42,297 Assessment fee reimbursement 24,675 23,026 24,150 19,950 20,000 21,300 1,300 Fire contributions 11,400 13,268 7,852 12,660 - 2,973 2,973 Insurance claims - 29,926 - 46,475 - - - Other miscellaneous 9,272 36,423 46,034 27,440 25,160 39,243 14,083 Other Financing Sources Sales of capital assets - 30,473 11,180 1,725 - 15,000 15,000 Total revenues and other sources $ 7,119,002 $ 7,668,119 $ 8,282,736 $ 8,495,070 $ 8,287,000 $ 8,704,793 $ 417,793 Expenditures and other uses - summary General government $ 1,439,034 $ 1,459,575 $ 1,488,350 $ 1,615,630 $ 1,721,583 $ 1,650,129 $ (71,454) Public safety 1,845,073 1,972,986 2,036,777 2,178,728 2,363,495 2,354,453 (9,042) Public works 1,792,870 1,709,063 1,802,884 1,904,391 2,369,191 2,079,091 (290,100) Sanitation 517,956 563,477 600,300 614,328 626,544 615,586 (10,958) Transit 10,000 40,000 41,250 3,191 30,000 18,333 (11,667) Recreation and culture 791,990 962,186 1,016,025 1,119,343 1,169,808 1,200,388 30,580 General unallocated 12,584 8,082 7,226 7,086 6,379 6,428 49 Transfers out and other uses 293,000 297,012 - 300,000 - 700,000 700,000 Total expenditures and other uses $ 6,702,507 $ 7,012,381 $ 6,992,812 $ 7,742,697 $ 8,287,000 $ 8,624,408 $ 337,408 Expenditures and other uses - divisions General government Mayor and council $ 52,181 $ 52,572 $ 57,507 $ 54,123 $ 57,350 $ 53,928 $ (3,422) City administration 274,681 314,690 326,134 481,843 448,881 449,100 219 City clerk 41,835 2,979 66,031 102,422 131,409 130,948 (461) Finance 385,662 377,867 393,754 425,247 467,242 430,924 (36,318) Audit 53,541 37,798 39,273 44,745 42,000 40,531 (1,469) City assessing 49,832 50,466 50,415 51,972 65,000 66,190 1,190 Legal 29,303 36,946 29,152 35,714 38,000 27,967 (10,033) Human resources 90,565 117,249 116,522 123,206 133,118 126,581 (6,537) Planning and zoning 220,080 244,976 210,173 216,007 248,020 239,045 (8,975) (continued) 77 CITY OF MONTICELLO Schedule of Revenues (Sources) and Expenditures (Uses) General Fund For the Year Ended December 31, 2018 (Continued) 2018 Variance with 2014 2015 2016 2017 Final 2018 Final Actual Actual Actual Actual Budget Actual Budget General government (continued) Information technology services $ 33,759 $ 19,872 $ 692 $ - $ - $ - $ City hall 193,186 190,833 189,780 63,149 72,810 59,683 (13,127) Prairie center building 14,409 13,327 8,917 17,202 17,753 25,232 7,479 Public safety Law Enforcement 1,098,403 1,174,439 1,212,080 1,257,194 1,360,197 1,362,411 2,214 Fire and rescue 306,780 309,970 289,010 350,891 414,328 435,068 20,740 Fire relief 108,186 120,027 123,656 125,764 120,000 132,874 12,874 Building inspections 266,544 304,858 350,304 381,260 399,409 351,511 (47,898) Civil defense 1,660 1,500 1,234 1,933 3,265 12,332 9,067 Animal control 49,439 48,754 46,943 48,166 51,796 46,608 (5,188) National Guard 14,061 13,438 13,550 13,520 14,500 13,649 (851) Public works Public works administration 122,151 124,504 126,327 120,785 201,955 196,851 (5,104) Engineering 195,841 110,555 111,795 130,325 165,492 126,179 (39,313) Public works inspecitons 36,867 32,084 62,100 62,882 119,967 83,560 (36,407) Streets and alleys 735,629 737,836 806,098 846,575 1,038,451 891,117 (147,334) Ice and snow 308,387 263,020 264,232 267,095 292,315 344,974 52,659 Shop and garage 177,644 185,837 171,079 200,690 207,046 168,049 (38,997) Stormwater 16,842 26,712 29,277 30,743 73,465 23,883 (49,582) Parking lots 3,814 2,030 - - - - Street lighting 195,695 226,485 231,976 245,296 270,500 244,478 (26,022) Sanitation Refuse and recycling collection 517,956 563,477 600,300 614,328 626,544 615,586 (10,958) Transit Bus service 10,000 40,000 41,250 3,191 30,000 18,333 (11,667) Recreation and culture Senior center 97,547 97,115 99,124 103,161 103,715 103,226 (489) Park operations 570,639 706,934 775,738 871,121 918,855 916,335 (2,520) Park ballfields 18,149 16,971 20,538 21,936 26,900 21,063 (5,837) Shade tree 68,891 104,990 75,802 80,922 75,050 80,916 5,866 Public arts - - - - - 29,876 29,876 Library 36,764 36,176 44,823 42,203 45,288 48,972 3,684 General unallocated Insurances and other 12,584 8,082 7,226 7,086 6,379 6,428 49 Transfers out and other uses Transfers out 293,000 297,012 - 300,000 - 700,000 700,000 Total expenditures & other uses $ 6,702,507 $ 7,012,381 $ 6,992,812 $ 7,742,697 $ 8,287,000 $ 8,624,408 $ 337,408 Revenue and other sources over expenditures and other uses $ 416,495 $ 655,738 $ 1,289,924 $ 752,373 $ - $ 80,385 80,385 78 Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance Budget and Actual - Minnesota Investment Fund For the Year Ended December 31, 2018 CITY OF MONTICELLO Variance with Final Budget $ (4,793) 58,237 (63,030) (232,946) (295,976) $ (295,976) 79 Orginal and Final Budget Actual Revenues Investment earnings $ 15,000 $ 10,207 Expenditures Current Economic development Repayment of program proceeds - 58,237 Excess (deficiency) of revenues over expenditures 15,000 (48,030) Other financing sources (uses) Transfers out - (232,946) Net change in fund balance 15,000 (280,976) Fund balance at beginning of year 1,153,959 1,153,959 Fund balance at end of year $ 1,168,959 $ 872,983 CITY OF MONTICELLO Variance with Final Budget $ (4,793) 58,237 (63,030) (232,946) (295,976) $ (295,976) 79 Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance Budget and Actual - Cemetery Fund For the Year Ended December 31, 2018 Revenues Charges for services Investment earnings Total revenues Expenditures Current Recreation and culture Cemetery operations Net change in fund balance Fund balance at beginning of year Fund balance at end of year Orginal and Final Budget $ 18,000 600 18,600 27,723 (9,123) 50,947 41,824 Actual 19,086 528 19,614 18,501 1,113 50,947 52,060 CITY OF MONTICELLO Variance with Final Budget $ 1,086 (72) 1,014 (9,222) 10,236 $ 10,236 M CITY OF MONTICELLO Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance Budget and Actual - CDBG-Revitalization Fund For the Year Ended December 31, 2018 Orginal and Final Variance with Budget Actual Final Budget Revenues Investment earnings $ - $ 11 $ 11 Fund balance at beginning of year 369 369 - Fund balance at end of year $ 369 $ 380 $ 11 81 Schedule of Assets, Liabilities, Deferred Inflows of Resources and Fund Balances Economic Development Authority December 31, 2018 ASSETS Cash and investments Receivables Unremitted taxes Delinquent taxes Accounts Intrafund receivable Prepaid items Notes receivable Land held for resale TOTAL ASSETS LIABILITIES Accounts and contracts payable Due to other governmental units Intrafund payable Unearned revenue Total liabilities DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES Unavailable revenue - property taxes FUND BALANCES Nonspendable Restricted Assigned Total fund balance TOTAL LIABILITIES, DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES, AND FUND BALANCES Required or Actual Decertification Date TIF District Type (d) = decertified CITY OF MONTICELLO (continued) 82 TIF 6 (d) TIF 19 TIF 20 (d) TIF 22 TIF 24 EDA General GMEF TIF Future Raindance MS Shores Prairie West Downtown St. Henry's $ 1,628,980 $ 982,652 $ $ 719,519 $ 251,820 $ 99,685 $ 133,475 $ 164,724 4,722 - - - - - - 849 2,601 373,911 2,383 - - 194,124 - 2,677,375 - - - - 163,200 - $ 4,690,821 $ 1,176,776 $ $ 719,519 $ 251,820 $ 99,685 $ 296,675 $ 164,724 $ 8,071 $ - $ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 29 - 44,497 - - - 163,200 8,100 44,497 163,200 849 - - 2,383 - - - - - - - 1,176,776 - 719,519 251,820 99,685 133,475 164,724 4,679,489 -(44,497) - - - - - 4,681,872 1,176,776 (44,497) 719,519 251,820 99,685 133,475 164,724 $ 4,690,821 $ 1,176,776 $ - $ 719,519 $ 251,820 $ 99,685 $ 296,675 $ 164,724 12/912013 12/31/2023 12110/2018 1213112024 1213112026 Redevelopment Housing Redevelopment Housing & Housing Redevelopment (continued) 82 Schedule of Assets, Liabilities, Deferred Inflows of Resources and Fund Balances Economic Development Authority December 31, 2018 (Continued) ASSETS Cash and investments Receivables Unremitted taxes Delinquent taxes Accounts Intrafund receivable Prepaid items Notes receivable Land held for resale TOTAL ASSETS LIABILITIES Accounts and contracts payable Due to other governmental units Intrafund payable Unearned revenue Total liabilities DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES Unavailable revenue - property taxes FUND BALANCES Nonspendable Restricted Assigned Total fund balance TOTAL LIABILITIES, DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES, AND FUND BALANCES Required or Actual Decertification Date TIF District Type (d) = decertified CITY OF MONTICELLO TIF 29 TIF 30 TIF 34 TIF 35 (d) TIF 39 TIF 40 GAAP Total Front Porch CMHP Interchange Landmark Otter Creek Briggs Reconciliation EDA $ 113,702 $ 103,980 $ 5,567 $ $ 56 $ $ $ 4,204,160 - - - - 4,722 849 2,601 (373,911) - 2,383 194,124 - - - - - 2,840,575 $ 113,702 $ 103,980 $ 5,567 $ $ 56 $ $ (373,9111 $ 7,249,414 $ - $ - $ - $ $ - $ $ - $ 8,071 - - 29 122,773 206,641 (373,911) - 163,200) 122,773 206,641 537,111) 8,100 - - - 849 - - - 2,383 113,702 (18,793) 5,567 (206,585) 163,200 2,603,090 - - - 4,634,992 113,702 (18,793) 5,567 (206,585) 163,200 7,240,465 $ 113,702 $ 103,980 $ 5,567 $ $ 56 $ $ (373,911) $ 7,249,414 12/31/2029 12/31/2029 12/31/2022 6/25/2018 12/31/2021 12/31/2045 Housing Housing Redevelopment Redevelopment Economic Housing Development 83 Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Other Financing Sources (Uses) Economic Development Authority For the Year Ended December 31, 2018 Revenues Property taxes Tax increments Investment earnings Interest on intrafund loans Other revenues Total revenues Expenditures: Current Salary and wages Benefits Professional services - legal Professional services - other LPV Insurance Legal and general publications Property taxes Marketing Dues and membership Utilities IT services Travel and conferences Land adjustment to market Other expenses Excess increments Interest on intrafund loans PAYG payments to third parties Total expenditures Excess (deficiency) of revenues over expenditures Other financing sources (uses) Transfers in Transfers out Total other financing sources (uses) Net change in fund balances Fund balance at beginning of year Fund balance at end of year Required or Actual Decertification Date TIF District Type (d) = decertified CITY OF MONTICELLO 84 TIF 6 (d) TIF 19 TIF 20 (d) TIF 22 TIF 24 EDA General GMEF TIF Future Raindance MS Shores Prairie West Downtown St. Henry's $ 323,186 $ $ $ $ - $ - $ - $ - - 32,187 18,909 263,401 43,271 17,343 9,702 6,578 2,155 703 3,610 1,309 12,795 - - - - - - 500 2,332 - - - - - 353,824 12,034 6,578 34,342 19,612 267,011 44,580 80,232 - - - - - - 31,731 24,152 - - - 62,515 100 1,000 100 1,011 - - - - 477 35 35 35 35 19,479 - - - - 3,584 6,295 - 1,149 198 3,486 - 1,387 461,513 - 10,406 - 227,167 - 16,739 126,245 - - 4,491 44,920 - 707,417 - - 35 21,365 399,565 135 (353,593) 12,034 6,578 34,307 (1,753) (132,554) 44,445 116,473 - - - - 116,473 - - - - (237,120) 12,034 6,578 34,307 (1,753) (132,554) 44,445 4,918,992 1,164,742 (44,497) 712,941 217,513 101,438 266,029 120,279 $ 4,681,872 $ 1,176,776 $ (44,497) $ 719,519 $ 251,820 $ 99,685 $ 133,475 $ 164,724 12/912013 1213112023 12/10/2018 1213112024 1213112026 Redevelopment Housing Redevelopment Housing & Housing Redevelopment (continued) 84 CITY OF MONTICELLO Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Other Financing Sources (Uses) Economic Development Authority For the Year Ended December 31, 2018 (Continued) 85 TIF 29 TIF 30 TIF 34 TIF 35 (d) TIF 39 TIF 40 GAAP Total Front Porch CMHP Interchange Landmark Otter Creek Briggs Reconciliation EDA Revenues Property taxes $ - $ - $ - $ $ - $ $ $ 323,186 Tax increments 26,144 10,883 201,516 41,967 638,278 Investment earnings 1,016 946 45 - 43,407 Interest on intrafund loans - - - (12,795) - Other revenues - - - - 2,832 Total revenues 27,160 11,829 201,561 41,967 (12,795) 1,007,703 Expenditures: Current Salary and wages - - - - 80,232 Benefits 31,731 Professional services - legal - - - 1,954 26,106 Professional services - other 100 100 90 - 64,005 LPV Insurance - - - - 1,011 Legal and general publications 35 35 35 35 757 Property taxes - - - - 19,479 Marketing 3,584 Dues and membership 6,295 Utilities 1,347 IT services 3,486 Travel and conferences 1,387 Land adjustment to market 461,513 Other expenses 237,573 Excess increments - - 142,984 Interest on intrafund loans - 3,233 9,562 (12,795) - PAYG payments to third parties 20,915 - - - - 70,326 Total expenditures 21,050 3,368 125 1,989 9,562 (12,795) 1,151,816 Excess (deficiency) of revenues over expenditures 6,110 8,461 201,436 (1,989) 32,405 (144,113) Other financing sources (uses) Transfers in - - - - 116,473 Transfers out (200,000) (200,000) Total other financing sources (uses) - - (200,000) - (83,527) Net change in fund balances 6,110 8,461 1,436 (1,989) 32,405 - (227,640) Fund balance at beginning of year 107,592 (27,254) 4,131 1,989 (238,990) 163,200 7,468,105 Fund balance at end of year $ 113,702 $ (18,793) $ 5,567 $ - $ (206,585) $ $ 163,200 $ 7,240,465 Required or Actual Decertification Date 12131/2029 12/31/2029 12/31/2022 6/25/2018 12/31/2021 12/31/2045 TIF District Type Housing Housing Redevelopment Redevelopment Economic Housing (d) = decertified Development 85 CITY OF MONTICELLO Schedule of Assets, Liabilities, Deferred Inflows of Resources and Fund Balances Debt Service Activities December 31, 2018 ASSETS Cash and cash equivalents Receivables Unremitted special assessments Deliquent special assessments Deferred special assessments Total assets LIABILITIES Accounts and contracts payable DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES Unavailable revenue - special assessments FUND BALANCES Restricted for debt service Total liabilities, deferred inflows of resources, and fund balances 0 General Obligation Bonds 2010A 2011A 2014A 20158 2016A 2017A 2018A Improvement Refunding Bonds Bonds Bonds Bonds Bonds Total $ 793,964 $ 896,565 $ 91,115 $ 94,324 $ 348,671 $ 150,790 $ 5,027 $2,380,456 8 - - - - 12,454 - 12,462 59 - - - - 702 761 77,383 2,570,679 - 120,365 614,712 382,993 - 3,766,132 $ 871,414 $3,467,244 $ 91,115 $ 214,689 $ 963,383 $ 546,939 $ 5,027 $6,159,811 $ 229 $ 229 $ 229 $ 229 $ 229 $ 229 $ - $ 1,374 77,442 2,570,679 - 120,365 614,712 383,695 - 3,766,893 793,743 896,336 90,886 94,095 348,442 163,015 5,027 2,391,544 $ 871,414 $3,467,244 $ 91,115 $ 214,689 $ 963,383 $ 546,939 $ 5,027 $6,159,811 0 Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Other Financing Sources (Uses) Debt Service Activities For the Year Ended December 31, 2018 Revenues Property taxes Special assessments Investment earnings Total revenues Expenditures Debt service Principal Interest and fiscal charges Total expenditures Excess (deficiency) of revenues over expenditures Other financing sources Transfers in Net change in fund balance Fund balance at begining of year Fund balance at end of year CITY OF MONTICELLO 87 General Obligation Bonds 2010A 2011A 2014A 2015B 2016A 2017A 2018A Improvement Refunding Bonds Bonds Bonds Bonds Bonds Total $ 40,000 $ 148,061 $ 537,586 $ 203,425 $ 407,769 $ 450,159 $ $ 1,787,000 41,106 58,260 - 24,417 127,157 76,171 327,111 8,542 9,107 3,150 2,033 6,585 4,330 27 33,774 89,648 215,428 540,736 229,875 541,511 530,660 27 2,147,885 275,000 720,000 355,000 160,000 435,000 340,000 - 2,285,000 25,503 60,054 157,665 55,979 92,829 130,190 522,220 300,503 780,054 512,665 215,979 527,829 470,190 2,807,220 (210,855) (564,626) 28,071 13,896 13,682 60,470 27 (659,335) 44,899 200,000 - - - - 5,000 249,899 (165,956) (364,626) 28,071 13,896 13,682 60,470 5,027 (409,436) 959,699 1,260,962 62,815 80,199 334,760 102,545 - 2,800,980 $ 793,743 $ 896,336 $ 90,886 $ 94,095 $ 348,442 $ 163,015 $ 5,027 $ 2,391,544 87 IZCITY OF MMontic110 (This page left blank intentionally) m # 4 r F 7�7�!,�.�'�y� ,t X47 iti4�'Y�• •� J�[� Sjp•� t STATISTICAL SECTION L �4 7TT�e r STATISTICAL SECTION The Statistical Section is included to provide detailed data on the physical, economic, social and political characteristics of the reporting government. It is intended to provide the user with a broader and more complete understanding of the government and its financial affairs than is possible from the basic financial statements and supplementary information included in the Financial Section. Paqe Financial trends Net Position by Component - Last Ten Fiscal Years 89 Changes in Net Position - Last Ten Fiscal years 90 General Governmental Tax Revenues by Source - Last Ten Fiscal Years 92 Fund Balances of Governmental Funds - Last Ten Fiscal Years 93 Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds - Last Ten Fiscal Years 94 Governmental Funds Tax Revenues by Source - Last Ten Fiscal Years 95 Revenue capacity Tax Capacity Value and Estimated Market Value of Taxable Property - Last Ten Fiscal Years 96 Property Tax Rates - All Direct and Overlapping Governments - Last Ten Fiscal Years 97 Property Tax Levies and Collections - Last Ten Fiscal Years 98 Principal Property Taxpayers - Current Year and Nine Years Ago 99 New Construction and Bank Deposits - Last Ten Fiscal Years 100 Water Sold by Customer Type (gallons) - Last Ten Fiscal Years 101 Water and Sewage Utility Rates - Last Ten Fiscal Years 102 Debt capacity Ratios of Outstanding Debt by Type - Last Ten Fiscal Years 103 Ratios of Net General Obligation Bonded Debt Outstanding - Last Ten Fiscal Years 104 Legal Debt Margin Information - Last Ten Fiscal Years 105 Computation of Direct and Overlapping Debt - As of December 31, 2018 106 Schedule of General Obligation Revenue Bond Coverage - Last Ten Fiscal Years 107 Economic and demographic information Demographic and Economic Statistics - Last Ten Fiscal Years 108 Principal Employers - Current Year and Nine Years Ago 109 Operating information City Government Employees by Function/Program - Last Ten Fiscal Years 110 Operating Indicators by Function - Last Ten Fiscal Years 111 Capital Assets Statistics by Function - Last Ten Fiscal Years 113 Schedule of Cash Flows Adjusted for Additional City Funding of Fiber Optics Fund -Last Four Fiscal Years 114 Net Position by Component Last Ten Fiscal Years (accrual basis of accounting) Governmental activities Net investment in capital assets Restricted Unrestricted Total governmental net position Business -type activities Net investment in capital assets Restricted Unrestricted Total business -type net position Primary government Net investment in capital assets Restricted Unrestricted Total primary government net position CITY OF MONTICELLO 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 $ 33,712,370 $ 31,901,676 $ 38,242,040 $ 40,525,009 $ 44,268,757 $ 48,253,810 $ 38,099,568 $ 41,077,683 $ 41,535,637 $ 43,517,983 17, 688,193 18, 337,866 16, 894,936 13, 061,044 18,118,070 10,453,449 12,633,770 10, 569,693 11, 599,951 9,649,085 28,183,161 26,876,421 24,758,269 25,119,107 13,487,299 14,792,521 18,144,067 20,824,170 20,899,110 23,422,548 $ 79,583,724 $ 77,115,963 $ 79,895,245 $ 78,705,160 $ 75,874,126 $ 73,499,780 $ 68,877,405 $ 72,471,546 $ 74,034,698 $ 76,589,616 $ 29,910,696 $ 28,556,355 $ 25,031,043 $ 23,698,091 $ 20,496,832 $ 42,117,264 $ 40,722,087 $ 41,014,122 $ 39,944,797 $ 39,250,211 19,350 19,350 19,350 19,350 - - - - - - 2,846,018 6,363,148 6,901,353 7,642,046 6,463,638 9,121,952 8,163,982 9,052,590 11,905,058 13,261,505 $ 32,776,064 $ 34,938,853 $ 31,951,746 $ 31,359,487 $ 26,960,470 $ 51,239,216 $ 48,886,069 $ 50,066,712 $ 51,849,855 $ 52,511,716 $ 63,623,066 $ 60,458,031 $ 63,273,083 $ 64,223,100 $ 64,765,589 $ 90,371,074 $ 78,821,655 $ 82,091,805 $ 81,480,434 $ 82,768,194 17, 707,543 18, 357,216 16, 914,286 13, 080,394 18,118,070 10,453,449 12,633,770 10, 569,693 11, 599,951 9,649,085 31,029,179 33,239,569 31,659,622 32,761,153 19,950,937 23,914,473 26,308,049 29,876,760 32,804,168 36,684,053 $ 112,359,788 $ 112,054,816 $ 111,846,991 $ 110,064,647 $ 102,834,596 $ 124,738,996 $ 117,763,474 $ 122,538,258 $ 125,884,553 $ 129,101,332 $100 Primary Government Net Position $80 ■ Net investment in c $60 capital assets ■ Restricted net $40 , position $20 _ ■ Unrestricted net position $Aal - 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Note 1: In fiscal years 2012 and 2013, the city had a change in accounting principle, a change in fund structure, and prior period adjustments. In addition, the city implemented GASB Statement No. 68 and GASB Statement No. 71 in fiscal year 2015, and GASB Statement No. 75 in fiscal year 2018. Prior years have not been adjusted to reflect these changes. 0 CITY OF MONTICELLO Changes in Net Position Last Ten Fiscal Years (accrual basis of accounting) Expenses 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Governmental activities General government $ 1,780,972 $ 2,065,463 $ 2,111,710 $ 2,103,737 $ 1,623,727 $ 1,488,243 $ 1,447,725 $ 1,694,111 $ 1,656,666 $ 1,614,613 Public safety 2,849,272 1,766,712 1,788,595 1,819,378 1,884,981 1,880,193 1,960,009 2,187,363 2,208,971 2,377,661 Public works 3,827,501 3,579,291 4,838,544 5,045,729 5,163,461 5,223,345 5,312,612 5,480,074 5,292,743 5,548,199 Sanitation 547,160 534,903 495,693 500,037 487,268 517,956 563,477 600,300 614,328 615,586 Transit - - - - - 10,000 40,000 41,250 3,191 18,333 Recreation and culture 2,855,682 2,636,088 1,753,197 2,719,730 2,875,260 2,882,127 3,524,979 3,998,945 3,521,756 3,460,887 Economic development 842,819 2,647,687 1,199,936 803,594 1,005,813 1,084,620 1,547,875 756,620 488,380 1,206,067 Interest and fiscal charges 1,673,431 1,464,012 1,248,716 1,298,869 235,265 649,854 735,753 565,774 514,558 617,344 Total governmental activities 14,376,837 14,694,156 13,436,391 14,291,074 13,275,775 13,736,338 15,132,430 15,324,437 14,300,593 15,458,690 Business -type activities Water utility 1,018,098 936,718 1,167,572 1,118,789 1,009,600 1,084,882 1,102,610 1,168,473 1,157,506 1,235,055 Sewage utility 2,074,447 2,495,976 2,340,555 2,480,657 2,466,660 2,762,357 2,661,990 2,618,887 2,708,053 2,932,413 Liquor 669,940 637,574 658,999 662,002 689,559 692,976 798,631 831,809 874,921 848,221 Fiber optics 2,792,813 3,815,377 5,702,480 5,228,428 5,240,871 2,919,170 2,536,461 2,483,262 2,252,287 2,276,015 Deputy registrar - - - - 293,531 300,236 313,968 345,492 390,658 421,662 Total business -type activities 6,555,298 7,885,645 9,869,606 9,489,876 9,700,221 7,759,621 7,413,660 7,447,923 7,383,425 7,713,366 Total primary government expenses $ 20,932,135 $ 22,579,801 $ 23,305,997 $ 23,780,950 $ 22,975,996 $ 21,495,959 $ 22,546,090 $ 22,772,360 $ 21,684,018 $ 23,172,056 Program Revenues Governmental activities Charges for services General government $ 443,976 $ 491,304 $ 521,182 $ 619,992 $ 147,244 $ 180,145 $ 214,087 $ 274,309 $ 239,460 $ 207,802 Public safety 155,036 96,293 202,237 179,540 163,366 164,616 320,158 894,311 851,307 780,236 Public works 744,241 1,556,098 508,077 383,066 544,404 371,671 521,697 527,425 283,241 217,675 Sanitation 167,119 165,387 52,304 53,077 16,653 48,385 104,786 89,956 80,774 169,337 Recreation and culture 1,139,199 1,153,113 1,240,970 1,150,273 1,307,149 1,331,581 1,488,197 1,437,659 1,493,651 1,630,915 Economic development 155,769 - - - - - 14,653 301,232 13,846 2,832 Operating grants and contributions 269,492 424,845 253,127 252,784 293,710 295,828 355,041 389,005 429,697 428,443 Capital grants and contributions 2,067,509 4,124,271 2,083,511 1,841,915 1,079,738 1,774,628 2,667,710 3,297,265 1,996,441 2,044,698 Total governmental activities program revenues 5,142,341 8,011,311 4,861,408 4,480,647 3,552,264 4,166,854 5,686,329 7,211,162 5,388,417 5,481,938 Business -type activities Charges for services Water utility 1,019,390 828,635 1,078,133 1,304,923 1,214,570 1,117,226 1,126,718 1,172,258 1,415,441 1,432,194 Sewage utility 1,371,776 1,470,537 1,712,058 1,850,919 1,981,491 2,081,660 2,083,122 2,223,252 2,472,774 2,581,833 Liquor 1,043,256 1,174,767 1,151,171 1,214,745 1,318,276 1,289,369 1,524,338 1,409,406 1,525,150 1,544,234 Fiber optics - 456,820 1,610,258 1,747,587 1,606,720 1,761,978 1,642,403 1,739,566 1,757,134 1,736,243 Deputy registrar - - - 456,285 497,798 535,931 562,891 594,777 694,263 Capital grants and contributions - - - - - 488,628 1,454,980 2,000,456 699,901 925,195 Total business -type activities program revenues 3,434,422 3,930,759 5,551,620 6,118,174 6,577,342 7,236,659 8,367,492 9,107,829 8,465,177 8,913,962 Total primary government program revenues $ 8,576,763 $ 11,942,070 $ 10,413,028 $ 10,598,821 $ 10,129,606 $ 11,403,513 $ 14,053,821 $ 16,318,991 $ 13,853,594 $ 14,395,900 (continued) M Changes in Net Position Last Ten Fiscal Years (accrual basis of accounting) Net (expense)/revenue Governmental activities Business -type activities Total primary government net expense General Revenues and Other Changes in Net Position Governmental activities Taxes Property taxes Tax increment Franchise taxes Unrestricted grants and contributions Investment earnings Other Gain on sale of capital assets Transfers Total governmental activities Business -type activities Investment earnings Miscellaneous Gain on extinguishment of debt Contribution of land to County Transfer of operations Transfers Total business -type activities Total primary government Changes in Net Position Governmental activities Business -type activities Total primary government CITY OF MONTICELLO 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 $ ((9,234,496) $ (((6,682,845) $ (((8,574,983) $ (((9,810,427) $ (((9,723,511) $ (9,,569,484) $ (9,446,101) $ (8,113,275) $ (8,912,176) $ (9,976,752) 3,954 86) 4,317,986 3371,702) $ (12,355,3721 $ (10,637,73 $ (12,892,96 $ (13,182,12 $ (12,846,3901 $ (10,092,4461 $ (8492,2691 $ (6,453,3691 $ (7,830,4241 $ (8,776,1561 $ 7,628,547 $ 7,105,319 $ 7,406,358 $ 7,722,214 $ 7,961,229 $ 8,393,374 $ 8,683,585 $ 9,270,592 $ 9,560,482 $ 9,972,166 1,193,021 1,155,386 1,044,791 1,024,134 965,935 826,363 727,617 668,352 648,031 638,278 48,517 371,258 341,362 339,518 320,640 357,409 333,484 412,217 436,248 386,622 406,735 37,665 19,359 38,618 65,228 27,502 - - - - 770,178 859,583 1,467,780 767,722 (189,128) 784,347 278,465 375,614 379,107 364,364 41,173 - - 11,575 3,885 217,643 30,473 11,180 - - 366,961 442,091 354,501 540,272 489,782 - - - 1,725 15,000 251,133 (5,774,257) 713,655 (2,420,489) 278,500 (3,411,500) 2,301,045 969,461 (550,265) 1,000,000 10,706,265 4,197,045 11,347,806 8,023,564 9,896,071 7,195,138 12,354,669 11,707,416 10,475,328 12,376,430 188,178 236,131 495,484 264,589 (117,175) 399,757 108,191 128,080 151,126 162,003 42,360 125,326 1,555,509 100,687 65,468 - 88,157 5,218 - 379,246 - - - - - 20,990,451 - - - - (5,511,547) - - - - 356,900 - (2(51,133) 5,774,257 (713,655) 2,420,489 (278,500) 3,411,500 (2,301,045) ((969,461) 550,265 (1,,000,000) 6,135,714 1,337,338 2,785,765 24,801,708 71,39 $ 10,685,670) $ 10,332,759 $ 12,685,144 $ 10,809,329 $ 9(565,864) $ 31,996,846 $ (4,738,425) $ 11,2'28,153) $ 11,176,7119 $ 11,917,679) $ 1,471,769 $ (2,485,800) $ 2,772,823 $ (1,786,863) $ 172,560 $ (2,374,346) $ 2,908,568 $ 3,594,141 $ 1,563,152 $ 2,399,678 3,141,471) 2,180,828 (2,980,648) 585,937 3,453,086) 24,278,746 6,662,412) 1,180,643 1,783,143 741,845 $ 1,669,702) $ (304,972) $ (207,825) $ (2, 72,800 $ 3,280,526) $ 21,904,400 $ 3,753,844) $ 4,774,784 $ 3,346,295 $ 3,141,523 Note 1: The City made a fund structure change for the period ending December 31, 2013. Prior year data has not been restated as a result of this change. Note 2: The city implemented GASB Statement No. 68 and GASB Statement No. 71 in fiscal year 2015, and GASB Statement No. 75 in fiscal year 2018. Prior years have not been adjusted to reflect these changes. 91 General Governmental Tax Revenues by Source Last Ten Fiscal Years (accrual basis of accounting) Year 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Change 2009-2018 Source: Finance Department CITY OF MONTICELLO Property Tax Franchise Tax Increment Tax Total $ 7,628,547 $ 1,193,021 $ 48,517 $ 8,870,085 7,105,319 1,155,386 371,258 8,631,963 7,406,358 1,044,791 341,362 8,792,511 7,722,214 1,024,134 339,518 9,085,866 7,961,229 965,935 320,640 9,247,804 8,393,374 826,363 357,409 9,577,146 8,683,585 727,617 333,484 9,744,686 9,270,592 668,352 412,217 10,351,161 9,560,482 648,031 436,248 10,644,761 9,972,166 638,278 386,622 10, 997,066 30.7% -46.5% $12 $10 N $8 c ° $6 $4 $2 ,- LL L 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Tax Revenues by Source 696.9% ■ Property Tax ■Tax Increment Franchise Tax 24.0% 92 CITY OF MONTICELLO Fund Balances of Governmental Funds Last Ten Fiscal Years (modified accrual basis of accounting) Note 1: The City made a fund structure change for the period ending December 31, 2013. Prior year data has not been restated as a result of this change. Note 2: The city implemented GASB 54 for the financial reporting period ending December 31, 2011. Prior years have not been restated as a result of this change. 93 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 General Fund Reserved $ 392,541 $ 336,286 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Unreserved 4,705,092 4,644,748 - Nonspendable - - 386,616 342,380 258,100 126,327 113,302 134,245 110,869 124,650 Restricted - - - - - - - - Committed 3,374,200 Assigned - - - - - - - - Unassigned 649,821 3,136,127 3,656,463 4,204,731 4,873,494 6,142,475 6,918,224 6,984,828 Total general fund $ 5,097,633 $ 4,981,034 $ 4,410,637 $ 3,478,507 $ 3,914,563 $ 4,331,058 $ 4,986,796 $ 6,276,720 $ 7,029,093 $ 7,109,478 All other governmental funds Reserved $10,280,326 $ 7,884,431 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Unreserved Special revenue 18,451,828 18,324,689 Capital projects (2,124,391) (1,532,220) - - - - - - - - Nonspendable 1,299,057 197,123 1,822,926 1,815,087 4,259,743 3,690,330 23,488 47,614 Restricted 22,140,662 21,480,938 10,928,985 10,453,449 8,619,905 6,987,234 7,924,461 5,867,997 Committed 2,662,124 - - - - - - - Assigned 9,138,626 8,655,488 6,485,727 7,321,744 11,109,806 13,320,718 16,910,080 17,145,463 Unassigned Special revenue (141,890) - - - - - - - Capital projects (1,435,666) - - - - - - - Total all other governmental funds $ 26,607,763 $ 24,676,900 $ 33,662,913 $ 30,333,549 $ 19,237,638 $ 19,590,280 $ 23,989,454 $ 23,998,282 $ 24,858,029 $ 23,061,074 Note 1: The City made a fund structure change for the period ending December 31, 2013. Prior year data has not been restated as a result of this change. Note 2: The city implemented GASB 54 for the financial reporting period ending December 31, 2011. Prior years have not been restated as a result of this change. 93 CITY OF MONTICELLO Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds Last Ten Fiscal Years (modified accrual basis of accounting) 94 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Revenues Property taxes $ 7,502,844 $ 7,319,154 $ 7,294,635 $ 8,234,086 $ 7,985,695 $ 8,407,627 $ 8,638,401 $ 9,295,983 $ 9,593,445 $ 9,967,550 Tax increments 1,193,021 1,155,386 1,044,791 1,024,134 965,935 826,363 727,617 668,352 648,031 638,278 Franchise taxes 48,517 371,258 341,362 339,518 320,640 357,409 333,484 412,217 436,248 386,622 Special assessments 2,462,673 1,465,264 1,856,134 1,902,871 2,065,944 1,912,932 3,318,901 984,390 946,669 700,190 Licenses and permits 266,797 217,184 249,999 275,699 331,711 378,810 461,049 668,602 600,933 504,464 Intergovernmental 1,688,895 1,620,771 1,434,420 540,475 1,264,781 732,366 1,520,239 2,041,362 1,340,094 911,477 Charges for services 2,518,548 2,890,006 2,239,584 2,076,834 1,846,919 1,722,974 2,063,520 2,222,475 1,909,357 2,098,362 Fines and forfeitures 1,220 205 85 14,338 1,725 1,900 42,474 30,656 36,702 45,350 Investment earnings 770,178 859,583 1,467,780 767,722 (183,242) 738,956 261,856 357,112 364,786 351,620 Other revenues 435,186 643,873 603,019 753,832 700,776 413,113 475,170 589,394 335,530 302,469 Total revenues 16,887,879 16,542,684 16,531,809 15,929,509 15,300,884 15,492,450 17,842,711 17,270,543 16,211,795 15,906,382 Expenditures General government 1,634,395 1,997,458 2,039,270 2,023,674 1,576,653 1,450,930 1,465,458 1,489,892 1,617,680 1,656,557 Public safety 2,738,768 1,684,296 1,728,409 1,735,579 1,805,434 1,845,073 1,972,986 2,036,777 2,178,728 2,354,453 Public works 2,074,811 1,562,155 1,675,222 1,703,849 1,707,576 1,793,162 1,734,562 1,941,750 2,009,481 2,079,305 Sanitation 547,160 534,903 495,693 500,037 505,996 517,956 563,477 600,300 614,328 615,586 Transit - - - - - 10,000 40,000 41,250 3,191 18,333 Culture and recreation 2,355,669 2,164,534 2,419,369 2,272,595 2,472,987 2,386,832 2,622,991 2,756,372 2,940,313 3,034,496 Economic development 842,819 2,647,687 1,198,449 800,540 1,011,961 1,084,620 1,237,107 530,746 486,706 1,210,053 Capital outlay 1,946,153 4,138,459 4,067,251 2,829,049 1,357,254 2,220,883 2,238,365 6,235,029 5,430,272 9,708,481 Debt service Principal 6,749,293 5,001,000 4,860,000 5,174,500 5,290,750 5,411,000 5,028,000 5,681,653 3,921,000 2,285,000 Interest and fiscal charges 1,801,392 1,553,661 1,383,095 1,290,430 930,982 658,983 570,753 529,116 470,508 522,220 Bond issuance costs - - - - - - 71,358 107,050 93,300 94,350 Total expenditures 20,690,460 21,284,153 19,866,758 18,330,253 16,659,593 17,379,439 17,545,057 21,949,935 19,765,507 23,578,834 Excess of revenues over (under) expenditures (3,802,581) (4,741,469) (3,334,949) (2,400,744) (1,358,709) (1,886,989) 297,654 (4,679,392) (3,553,712) (7,672,452) Other financing sources (uses) Long-term debt issued 3,255,000 10,735,000 6,080,000 2,605,000 4,900,000 5,000,000 5,000,000 Premium (discount) on debt issued (19,530) 301,910 (12,374) 46,898 97,503 78,814 40,882 Refunded bonds redeemed (865,000) - - (10,690,000) - - - - Sale of capital assets 62,496 67,569 - 11,575 12,428 - 30,473 11,180 1,725 15,000 Transfers in 10,172,878 4,687,126 5,710,819 9,990,120 6,906,770 4,914,385 4,261,817 2,192,636 1,029,628 2,082,845 Transfers out (9,921,745) (4,431,158) (4,997,164) (10,732,901) (7,158,933) (8,325,885) (2,186,930) (1,223,175) (944,335) (1,182,845) Total other financing sources (uses) 313,629 2,694,007 11,750,565 (731,206) (10,929,735) 2,656,126 4,757,258 5,978,144 5,165,832 5,955,882 Net change in fund balances $ (3,488,9521 $ (2,047,4621 $ 8,415,616 $ (3,131,9501 $ (12,288,4441 $ 769,137 $ 5,054,912 $ 1,298,752 $ 1,612,120 $(1,716,5701 Debt service as percentage of noncapital expenditures 45.6% 38.2% 42.6% 41.4% 41.7% 40.0% 35.1% 38.0% 30.4% 20.1% Note: The city made a fund structure change for the period ending December 31, 2013. Prior year data has not been modified to reflect this change. 94 Governmental Funds Tax Revenues by Source Last Ten Fiscal Years (modified accrual basis of accounting) Year 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Change 2009-2018 Source: Finance Department CITY OF MONTICELLO Property Tax Franchise Tax Increment Tax Total $ 7,502,844 $ 1,193,021 $ 48,517 $ 8,744,382 7,319,154 1,155,386 371,258 8,845,798 7,294,635 1,044,791 341,362 8,680,788 8,234,086 1,024,134 339,518 9,597,738 7,985,695 965,935 320,640 9,272,270 8,407,627 826,363 357,409 9,591,399 8,638,401 727,617 333,484 9,699,502 9,295,983 668,352 412,217 10,376,552 9,593,445 648,031 436,248 10,677,724 9,967,550 638,278 386,622 10,992,450 32.9% -46.5% Tax Revenues by Source 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 696.9% ■ Property Tax ■Tax Increment ■ Franchise Tax 25.7% 95 CITY OF MONTICELLO Tax Capacity Value and Estimated Market Value of Taxable Property Last Ten Fiscal Years $30 $25 $20 N C ° $15 $10 $5 $- 2009 Total Taxable Net Tax Capacity Value (Excludes Personal and Ag/Misc Property) 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Note 1: The fiscal year is for the values in the year levied for taxes collectible in the following year. Note 2: Tax exempt property values are not included in total taxable net tax capacity value. Source: Wright County Certificate of Taxes and Taxable Properties. ■ Residential ■ Commercial M Total Net Tax Real Property Taxable Net Capacity as a Residential %of Commercial %of Personal %of Ag/Misc %of Tax Capacity %of Total Direct Total Percentage of Year Property Total Property Total Property Total Property Total Value Total Tax Rate Market Value Market Value 2009 $ 7,506,973 41.8% $ 9,966,873 55.5% $ 174,223 1.0% $ 299,191 1.7% $ 17,947,260 100.0% 46.191 $ 1,245,407,600 1.4% 2010 6,165,704 35.4% 10,793,836 62.0% 189,563 1.1% 251,177 1.4% 17,400,280 100.0% 45.822 1,188,222,100 1.5% 2011 5,307,260 31.9% 10,897,898 65.5% 194,825 1.2% 229,016 1.4% 16,628,999 100.0% 46.729 1,106,541,400 1.5% 2012 4,611,403 23.6% 14,538,165 74.3% 235,633 1.2% 194,492 1.0% 19,579,693 100.0% 49.773 1,219,719,700 1.6% 2013 4,824,117 25.4% 13,793,916 72.5% 239,129 1.3% 164,609 0.9% 19,021,771 100.0% 42.234 1,201,075,800 1.6% 2014 5,408,138 21.9% 18,818,097 76.4% 235,713 1.0% 184,750 0.7% 24,646,698 100.0% 44.709 1,513,570,400 1.6% 2015 5,861,759 22.1% 20,316,219 76.4% 238,732 0.9% 164,516 0.6% 26,581,226 100.0% 35.737 1,712,125,200 1.6% 2016 6,505,649 23.0% 21,386,874 75.6% 248,668 0.9% 166,437 0.6% 28,307,628 100.0% 34.471 1,828,437,600 1.5% 2017 7,325,880 24.2% 22,510,588 74.4% 272,344 0.9% 141,596 0.5% 30,250,408 100.0% 33.172 1,962,020,100 1.5% 2018 8,086,159 27.1% 21,262,918 71.4% 286,580 1.0% 148,899 0.5% 29,784,556 100.0% 32.333 1,974,154,400 1.5% $30 $25 $20 N C ° $15 $10 $5 $- 2009 Total Taxable Net Tax Capacity Value (Excludes Personal and Ag/Misc Property) 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Note 1: The fiscal year is for the values in the year levied for taxes collectible in the following year. Note 2: Tax exempt property values are not included in total taxable net tax capacity value. Source: Wright County Certificate of Taxes and Taxable Properties. ■ Residential ■ Commercial M Property Tax Rates - All Direct and Overlapping Governments Last Ten Fiscal Years 0 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Special Districts 2.07 1.75 1.50 1.24 0.61 1.08 1.02 1.09 -6--Wright --*--District #882 City CITY OF MONTICELLO Total (1) Direct and Overlapping 106.91 108.34 114.57 122.72 113.36 116.43 99.21 96.38 90.03 88.99 Note 1: Information reflects total tax rates levied by each entity. Tax rates are expressed in terms of "net tax capacity." A property's tax capacity is determined by multiplying its taxable market value by a state determined class rate. Class rates vary by property type and change periodically based on state legislation. Components of the direct rate are not readily available. Source: Wright County 97 Overlapping Taxing Districts Monticello City Wright School Year of Monticello County District #882 2009 46.19 32.57 26.08 2010 45.82 35.82 24.95 2011 46.73 39.31 27.03 2012 49.77 43.45 28.26 2013 42.23 44.29 26.23 2014 44.71 43.45 28.27 2015 35.74 40.59 22.88 2016 34.47 39.97 20.86 2017 33.17 39.60 16.24 2018 32.33 39.95 15.62 Property Tax Rates For the three highest taxing authorities 60 40 v °C 20 7 0 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Special Districts 2.07 1.75 1.50 1.24 0.61 1.08 1.02 1.09 -6--Wright --*--District #882 City CITY OF MONTICELLO Total (1) Direct and Overlapping 106.91 108.34 114.57 122.72 113.36 116.43 99.21 96.38 90.03 88.99 Note 1: Information reflects total tax rates levied by each entity. Tax rates are expressed in terms of "net tax capacity." A property's tax capacity is determined by multiplying its taxable market value by a state determined class rate. Class rates vary by property type and change periodically based on state legislation. Components of the direct rate are not readily available. Source: Wright County 97 CITY OF MONTICELLO Property Tax Levies and Collections Last Ten Fiscal Years PROPERTY TAXES TAX INCREMENTS Collected within the Collected within the Total Collections Total Collections Total Tax Total Tax Net Levy Collections in Year of the Net Levy Collections in to Date Fiscal Abatements Total Uncollected Fiscal Levy for Tax Net % of % of Subsequent Year % of and Amount % of Year Fiscal Year Credits Levy Amount Net Levy Years Amount Net Levy Adjustments Amount Net Levy 2009 $ 7,750,119 $ 263,587 $ 7,486,532 $ 7,237,730 96.7% $ 215,996 $ 7,453,726 99.6% $ (32,806) $ 0.0% 2010 7,648,269 278,930 7,369,339 7,155,141 97.1% 187,503 7,342,644 99.6% (26,695) 0.0% 0.0% 2011 7,677,351 293,075 7,384,276 7,178,807 97.2% 185,426 7,364,233 99.7% (19,706) 337 0.0% 2012 7,850,042 - 7,850,042 7,759,174 98.8% 33,099 7,792,273 99.3% (57,415) 354 0.0% 2013 7,900,724 100.0% 7,900,724 7,827,356 99.1% 38,464 7,865,820 99.6% (33,113) 1,791 0.0% 2014 8,151,086 0.0% 8,151,086 8,109,373 99.5% 32,707 8,142,080 99.9% (7,012) 1,994 0.0% 2015 8,535,565 650,375 8,535,565 8,498,745 99.6% 21,126 8,519,871 99.8% (12,524) 3,170 0.0% 2016 9,205,700 638,278 9,205,700 9,177,787 99.7% 21,019 9,198,806 99.9% (3,572) 3,322 0.0% 2017 9,430,000 9,430,000 9,416,303 99.9% 10,054 9,426,357 100.0% (323) 3,320 0.0% 2018 9,870,000 9,870,000 9,850,163 99.8% - 9,850,163 99.8% - 19,837 0.2% TAX INCREMENTS Source: Wright County m Collected within the Total Collections Total Tax Year of the Net Levy Collections in to Date Abatements Total Uncollected Fiscal Levy for Tax Net % of Subsequent % of and % of Year Fiscal Year Credits Levy Amount Net Levy Years Amount Net Levy Adjustments Amount Net Levy 2009 $1,247,605 $ $ 1,247,605 $ 1,205,582 96.6% $ 39,200 $ 1,244,782 99.8% $ (2,823) $ 0.0% 2010 1,193,383 1,193,383 1,144,243 95.9% 36,309 1,180,552 98.9% (12,831) 0.0% 2011 1,071,686 1,071,686 1,044,309 97.4% 25,742 1,070,051 99.8% (1,635) 0.0% 2012 955,039 955,039 953,400 99.8% - 953,400 99.8% (1,639) 0.0% 2013 971,745 971,745 970,071 99.8% - 970,071 99.8% (1,674) 0.0% 2014 869,425 869,425 869,339 100.0% 60 869,399 100.0% (26) 0.0% 2015 729,130 729,130 727,558 99.8% - 727,558 99.8% (1,572) 0.0% 2016 668,351 668,351 668,351 100.0% 668,351 100.0% 0.0% 2017 650,375 650,375 648,033 99.6% 648,033 99.6% (2,342) 0.0% 2018 640,584 640,584 638,278 99.6% 638,278 99.6% (2,306) 0.0% Source: Wright County m CITY OF MONTICELLO Principal Property Taxpayers Current Year and Nine Years Ago (1) The market value and taxable net tax capacity value is for taxes levied in 2017, which are payable in 2018. Source: Wright County Certificate of Taxes and Taxable Properties and 2009 City of Monticello CAFR 0 2018 2009 Percentage of Percentage of (1) Taxable Net Tax Total Net Tax Taxable Net Tax Total Net Tax Taxpayer Market Value Capacity Value Rank Capacity Value Market Value Capacity Value Rank Capacity Value Xcel Energy (Northern States) $ 895,655,200 $ 17,906,151 1 59.2% $ 251,650,100 $ 5,025,557 1 29.0% IRET Properties 16,947,500 211,844 2 0.7% Walmart Real Estate Bus Trust 10,185,000 202,950 3 0.7% 12,869,100 253,830 3 1.5% Target Corporation 10,000,000 199,250 4 0.7% 13,161,600 262,482 2 1.5% CentraCare Medical Center (New River) 7,272,000 145,440 5 0.5% Home Depot USA, Inc. 6,501,500 129,280 6 0.4% 8,263,000 164,510 4 1.0% Mills Fleet Farm 7,755,400 128,368 7 0.4% Minnegasco Inc. 5,182,600 102,521 8 0.3% Spirit Master Funding (Muller Theatres) 5,156,300 101,626 9 0.3% 7,844,000 155,602 5 0.9% AX TC Retail, LP 4,092,900 81,858 10 0.3% Jacob Holdings of Sandberg Road 7,142,000 154,170 6 0.9% Jacob Holdings of Monticello, LLC 5,096,200 148,476 7 0.9% L&P Ventures, LLC 5,291,000 143,022 8 0.8% Ryan Companies 7,843,000 133,904 9 0.8% Tapper's Holdings, LLC 5,286,900 104,238 10 0.6% $ 968,748,400 $ 19,209,288 63.5% $ 324,446,900 $ 6,545,791 37.8% (1) The market value and taxable net tax capacity value is for taxes levied in 2017, which are payable in 2018. Source: Wright County Certificate of Taxes and Taxable Properties and 2009 City of Monticello CAFR 0 New Construction and Bank Deposits Last Ten Fiscal Years $25,000,000 $20,000,000 $15,000,000 $10,000,000 $5,000,000 2009 CITY OF MONTICELLO New Commercial Year Permits 2009 1 2010 3 2011 5 2012 2 2013 3 2014 3 2015 2 2016 7 2017 3 2018 4 $25,000,000 $20,000,000 $15,000,000 $10,000,000 $5,000,000 2009 CITY OF MONTICELLO New Residential and Commercial Construction _M —M 0. 1. 1. 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 ■ Residential ■ Commercial (1) Reported for Wright County as of June 30 Source: City of Monticello building department and FDIC Market Share Reports 1 2015 2016 2017 2018 100 Building Permits Bank Deposits (000s) New New New Total New Commercial Residential Residential Residential & Percent Value Permits Value Commercial Total (1) Change $ 1,346,120 9 $ 1,588,241 $ 2,934,361 $ 1,333,427 -0.9% 2,070,000 2 319,118 2,389,118 1,288,460 -3.4% 1,987,000 2 336,606 2,323,606 1,389,163 7.8% 880,000 22 3,520,415 4,400,415 1,407,421 1.3% 1,790,000 52 8,920,580 10,710,580 1,425,497 1.3% 2,106,000 72 12,317,617 14,423,617 1,486,376 4.3% 763,000 44 8,836,399 9,599,399 1,557,782 4.8% 19,425,000 61 12,750,071 32,175,071 1,643,984 5.5% 3,270,264 64 13,358,118 16,628,382 1,765,565 7.4% 6,783,829 58 12,148,575 18,932,404 1,827,691 3.5% New Residential and Commercial Construction _M —M 0. 1. 1. 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 ■ Residential ■ Commercial (1) Reported for Wright County as of June 30 Source: City of Monticello building department and FDIC Market Share Reports 1 2015 2016 2017 2018 100 Water Sold by Customer Type Last Ten Fiscal Years (gallons) Year 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 % of Residential Total 430,263,791 75.0% 376,687,840 67.1% 348,580,072 66.0% 426,358,402 69.0% 383,079,041 68.8% 328,835,772 68.2% 325,188,041 68.1% 329,068,876 67.7% 371,596,967 67.7% 352,322,681 67.3% 700 600 500 E 400 0 300 200 100 0 2009 CITY OF MONTICELLO Water Sold by Customer Type (gallons) Source: City of Monticello utility billing department 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 ■ Government Industrial Commercial ■ Residential 101 Total % of % of % of Water % of Commercial Total Industrial Total Government Total Sold Total 69,825,753 12.2% 38,713,057 6.8% 34,601,796 6.0% 573,404,397 100.0% 90,001,208 16.0% 47,225,176 8.4% 47,227,405 8.4% 561,141,629 100.0% 84,194,027 15.9% 50,971,196 9.7% 44,219,755 8.4% 527,965,050 100.0% 97,281,410 15.7% 46,654,712 7.5% 47,866,428 7.7% 618,160,952 100.0% 85,819,687 15.4% 45,954,136 8.2% 42,206,803 7.6% 557,059,667 100.0% 79,370,922 16.5% 38,308,124 7.9% 35,566,000 7.4% 482,080,818 100.0% 76,283,322 16.0% 38,897,216 8.1% 37,005,919 7.8% 477,374,498 100.0% 77,795,226 16.0% 42,407,860 8.7% 36,647,583 7.5% 485,919,545 100.0% 93,770,712 17.1% 43,220,312 7.9% 40,409,649 7.4% 548,997,640 100.0% 89,911,481 17.2% 43,067,083 8.2% 38,128,401 7.3% 523,429,646 100.0% Water Sold by Customer Type (gallons) Source: City of Monticello utility billing department 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 ■ Government Industrial Commercial ■ Residential 101 CITY OF MONTICELLO Water and Sewage Utility Rates Last Ten Fiscal Years N/A - Not Available Note: The city began billing monthly in 2017. Source: City of Monticello fee schedule 102 Water Sewage Residential Commercial Rate Tier 1 Rate Tier 2 Rate Tier 3 Rate Tier 4 Rate Tier 1 Rate Tier 2 Rate Tier 3 Rate Tier 4 Rate Tier 1 Rate Tier 1 Base Rate 501-4,000 4,001-13,369 Over 13,369 Base Rate 501-4,000 4,001-13,369 Over 13,369 Base Rate Over 500 Fiscal First 500 per 100 per 100 per 100 First 500 per 100 per 100 per 100 First 500 per 100 Year Cubic Feet Cubic Feet Cubic Feet Cubic Feet Cubic Feet Cubic Feet Cubic Feet Cubic Feet Cubic Feet Cubic Feet 2009 $ 12.40 $ 0.78 $ 0.88 N/A $ 12.40 $ 0.78 N/A N/A $ 14.45 $ 2.60 2010 13.00 0.85 0.95 N/A 14.75 0.95 N/A N/A 15.15 2.75 2011 14.30 0.95 1.10 1.20 14.30 0.95 1.10 1.20 16.75 3.00 2012 15.44 1.03 1.19 1.30 15.44 1.03 1.19 1.30 18.76 3.36 2013 17.00 1.13 1.31 1.43 17.00 1.13 1.31 1.43 20.65 3.70 2014 17.00 1.13 1.31 1.43 17.00 1.13 1.31 1.43 20.65 3.70 2015 17.85 1.19 1.38 1.50 17.85 1.19 1.38 1.50 21.69 3.89 2016 18.85 1.22 1.41 1.50 18.85 1.22 1.41 1.50 22.69 3.97 Water Sewage Residential Commercial Rate Tier 1 Rate Tier 2 Rate Tier 3 Rate Tier 4 Rate Tier 1 Rate Tier 2 Rate Tier 3 Rate Tier 4 Rate Tier 1 Rate Tier 1 Base Rate 1,001-10,000 10,001-33,000 Over 33,000 Base Rate 1,001-10,000 10,001-33,000 Over 33,000 Base Rate Over 1,000 Fiscal First 1,000 per 1,000 per 1,000 per 1,000 First 1,000 per 1,000 per 1,000 per 1,000 First 1,000 per 1,000 Year Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons 2017 6.45 1.66 1.92 2.09 6.45 1.66 1.92 2.09 8.05 5.48 2018 6.95 1.70 1.97 2.15 6.95 1.70 1.97 2.15 8.75 5.63 N/A - Not Available Note: The city began billing monthly in 2017. Source: City of Monticello fee schedule 102 Ratios of Outstanding Debt by Type Last Ten Fiscal Years Governmental activities General obligation bonds Special assessment Other Tax abatement Tax increment Net premium (discount) Total GO bonds Certificates of indebtedness Total general obligation debt Non -general obligation bonds Revenue Total governmental activites Business -type activities General obligation revenue bonds Non -general obligation Revenue bonds PFA loans Net premium (discount) Total business -type activities Total primary government % of personal income (1) Per capita debt (1) CITY OF MONTICELLO 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 $ 21,535,000 $ 21,320,000 $ 29,490,000 $ 26,625,000 $13,010,000 $12,203,653 $11,689,653 $12,730,000 $12,695,000 $10,925,000 12,822,903 11,531,903 10,196,903 8,877,403 7,506,653 10,487,000 9,563,000 7,686,000 5,785,000 5,375,000 - - - - - - - - 2,960,000 7,800,000 470,000 - - - - - - - - - 631,516 572,079 818,803 744,748 265,320 67,350 190,196 159,266 128,336 105,777 35,459,419 33,423,982 40,505,706 36,247,151 20,781,973 22,758,003 21,442,849 20,575,266 21,568,336 24,205,777 - - - - 445,000 385,000 325,000 265,000 200,000 135,000 35,459,419 33,423,982 40,505,706 36,247,151 21,226,973 23,143,003 21,767,849 20,840,266 21,768,336 24,340,777 5,209,011 4,612,454 3,690,898 2,739,341 1,782,784 985,000 - - - - $ 40,668,430 $ 38,036,436 $ 44,196,604 $ 38,986,492 $ 23,009,757 $ 24,128,003 $ 21,767,849 $ 20,840,266 $ 21,768,336 $ 24,340,777 $ 837,097 $ 747,097 $ 654,097 $ 568,597 $ 3,479,347 $ 3,206,347 $ 2,930,347 $ 2,460,000 $ 2,280,000 $ 2,095,000 26,445,000 26,445,000 26,445,000 26,445,000 26,445,000 - - - - - - - - - - 615,268 1,927,850 1,998,402 1,903,000 (479,980)_ (457,441)_ (434,904)_ (412,366)_ (360,211)_ 31,941 30,339 27,354 23,495 21,510 $26,802,117 $26,734,656 $26,664,193 $26,601,231 $29,564,136 $ 3,238,288 $ 3,575,954 $ 4,415,204 $ 4,301,897 $ 4,019,510 $ 67,470,547 $ 64,771,092 $ 70,860,797 $ 65,587,723 $ 52,573,893 $ 27,366,291 $ 25,343,803 $ 25,255,470 $ 26,070,233 $ 28,360,287 15.7% 15.8% 15.3% 13.2% 10.1% 5.1% 4.4% 4.2% 4.2% 4.4% $ 5,879 $ 5,632 $ 5,554 $ 5,071 $ 4,055 $ 2,106 $ 1,931 $ 1,899 $ 1,944 $ 2,115 (1) See the Schedule of Demographic and Economic Statistics. Source: Details regarding the city's outstanding debt can be found in the notes to basic financial statements. 103 CITY OF MONTICELLO Ratios of Net General Obligation Bonded Debt Outstanding Last Ten Fiscal Years (1) Does not include revenue bonds. (2) See the Schedule of Taxable Net Tax Capacity Value and Estimated Market Value of Taxable Property for the estimated actual market value. (3) See the Schedule of Demographic and Economic Statistics. Source: Details regarding the city's outstanding debt can be found in the notes to basic financial statements. 104 Percentage of Less Net Estimated General Position Actual Market Obligation Restricted for Value of Year Bonds (1) Debt Service Total Property (2) Per Capita (3) 2009 $ 36,296,516 $ 17,688,193 $ 18,608,323 1.49% $ 1,621 2010 34,171,079 18,337,866 15,833,213 1.33% 1,377 2011 41,159,803 16,894,936 24,264,867 2.19% 1,902 2012 36,815, 748 13,061,044 23,754,704 1.95% 1,836 2013 24,706,320 9,660,316 15,046,004 1.25% 1,161 2014 26,349,350 9,942,901 16,406,449 1.08% 1,263 2015 24,728,535 9,266,800 15,461,735 0.90% 1,178 2016 23,327,620 7,009,231 16,318,389 0.89% 1,227 2017 24,071,831 6,359,147 17,712,684 0.90% 1,321 2018 26,457,287 6,082,504 20,374,783 1.03% 1,503 (1) Does not include revenue bonds. (2) See the Schedule of Taxable Net Tax Capacity Value and Estimated Market Value of Taxable Property for the estimated actual market value. (3) See the Schedule of Demographic and Economic Statistics. Source: Details regarding the city's outstanding debt can be found in the notes to basic financial statements. 104 Legal Debt Margin Information Last Ten Fiscal Years CITY OF MONTICELLO Fiscal Year 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 $35,671,296 $45,407,112 $51,363,756 $54,853,128 $58,860,603 $ 59,224,632 6,200,000 10,872,000 9,888,000 7,951,000 8,945,000 13,310,000 $29,471,296 $34,535,112 $41,475,756 $46,902,128 $49,915,603 $ 45,914,632 17.4% 23.9% 19.3% 14.5% 15.2% 22.5% Legal Debt Margin Calculation for Fiscal Year 2018 Market value $ 1,974,154,400 Debt limit (3% of market value) $ 59,224,632 Debt applicable to limit General obligation bonds 26,330,000 Less amounts for general obligation bonds not subject to debt limit (13,020,000) Total net debt applicable to limit 13,310,000 Legal debt margin $ 45,914,632 Source: Details regarding the city's outstanding debt can be found in the notes to basic financial statements. Market value data provided in Wright County Certificate of Taxes and Taxable Properties. 105 2008 2009 2010 2011 Legal debt limit $38,074,842 $ 35,646,663 $33,196,242 $36,591,591 Total net debt applicable to debt limit 5,585,000 4,985,000 4,365,000 3,795,000 Legal debt margin $32,489,842 $30,661,663 $28,831,242 $32,796,591 Total net debt applicable to debt limit as a percentage of debt limit 14.7% 14.0% 13.1% 10.4% CITY OF MONTICELLO Fiscal Year 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 $35,671,296 $45,407,112 $51,363,756 $54,853,128 $58,860,603 $ 59,224,632 6,200,000 10,872,000 9,888,000 7,951,000 8,945,000 13,310,000 $29,471,296 $34,535,112 $41,475,756 $46,902,128 $49,915,603 $ 45,914,632 17.4% 23.9% 19.3% 14.5% 15.2% 22.5% Legal Debt Margin Calculation for Fiscal Year 2018 Market value $ 1,974,154,400 Debt limit (3% of market value) $ 59,224,632 Debt applicable to limit General obligation bonds 26,330,000 Less amounts for general obligation bonds not subject to debt limit (13,020,000) Total net debt applicable to limit 13,310,000 Legal debt margin $ 45,914,632 Source: Details regarding the city's outstanding debt can be found in the notes to basic financial statements. Market value data provided in Wright County Certificate of Taxes and Taxable Properties. 105 Computation of Direct and Overlapping Debt As of December 31, 2018 Jurisdiction DIRECT DEBT: City of Monticello OVERLAPPING DEBT: I.S.D. 882 Wright County Total Overlapping Debt Total direct and overlapping debt Gross bonded debt outstanding $ 24,340,777 47,345,000 95,840,000 Estimated percentage applicable to city (1) 100.0% 74.4% 17.5% CITY OF MONTICELLO Amount applicable to city $ 24,340,777 35,224,680 16,772,000 51,996,680 $ 76,337,457 (1) The percentage of overlapping debt applicable is estimated using taxable assessed property values. Applicable percentages were estimated by determining the portion of the government's taxable assessed value that is within the City's boundaries and dividing it by the government's total taxable assessed value. Note: Overlapping governments are those that coincide, at least in part, with the geographic boundaries of the City. This schedule estimates the portion of the outstanding debt of those overlapping governments that is borne by the residents and businesses of the City. This process recognizes that, when considering the government's ability to issue and repay long-term debt, the entire debt burden borne by the residents and businesses should be taken into account. However, this does not imply that every taxpayer is a resident and, therefore, responsible for repaying the debt of each overlapping government. Source: The Wright County auditor provided the debt outstanding and estimated applicable percentages for the school district and county. 106 CITY OF MONTICELLO Schedule of General Obligation Revenue Bond Coverage Last Ten Fiscal Years Sewaae Fund: Net Revenue Gross Operating Available for Debt Service Requirements (3) Year (3) Revenues (1) Expenses(2) Debt Service Principal Interest Total Coverage 2013 $2,006,718 $1,476,418 $ 530,300 $ - $ - $ - - 2014 2,081,660 1,570,197 511,463 273,000 91,963 364,963 140.1% 2015 2,083,122 1,479,157 603,965 276,000 84,158 360,158 167.7% 2016 2,223,252 1,411,831 811,421 570,830 78,002 648,832 125.1% 2017 2,472,774 1,552,617 920,157 289,000 63,823 352,823 260.8% 2018 2,581,833 1,674,428 907,405 287,149 81,125 368,274 246.4% (1) Total revenues does not include investment earnings. (2) Total operating expenses excluding depreciation. (3) The first year of bond payments is 2014. Schedule excludes telecommunications bonds. No other revenue bonds existed before 2013. Source: Finance Department 107 CITY OF MONTICELLO Demographic and Economic Statistics Last Ten Fiscal Years Notes/sources: (1) 2010 U.S. Bureau of Census; 2009 and 2011-2018 Minnesota State Demographic Center population estimates. (2) Annual average unemployment rate for Wright County provided by the Minnesota Department of Employment & Economic Development. (3) ISD No. 882 enrollment information was obtained from the District's CAFR for the year ended June 30, 2018. (4) This estimated personal income number is calculated by taking the per capita personal income and multiplying it by the city's population. Also see note (5) regarding the per capita personal income figures. (5) Per capita personal income data is provided by the Bureau of Economic Analysis. Monticello's estimates are based on Wright County information. Wright County, where Monticello is located, is the smallest, relevant statistical tracking area. Data is subject to annual revisions by the Bureau of Economic Analysis. 108 Per Estimated Capita Unemployment School Personal Personal Year Population (1) rate (2) Enrollment (3) Income (4) Income (5) 2009 11,476 7.9% 3,928 $ 430,923,800 $ 37,550 2010 11,501 8.8% 3,932 410,758,215 35,715 2011 12,759 7.5% 3,921 462,041,667 36,213 2012 12,935 6.2% 3,989 498,178,590 38,514 2013 12,964 4.6% 4,031 520,193,464 40,126 2014 12,993 3.8% 4,010 531,660,567 40,919 2015 13,125 3.7% 4,115 570,058,125 43,433 2016 13,299 4.3% 4,119 603,960,786 45,414 2017 13,409 3.5% 4,074 620,461,248 46,272 2018 13,553 3.4% 4,157 644,811,081 47,577 Notes/sources: (1) 2010 U.S. Bureau of Census; 2009 and 2011-2018 Minnesota State Demographic Center population estimates. (2) Annual average unemployment rate for Wright County provided by the Minnesota Department of Employment & Economic Development. (3) ISD No. 882 enrollment information was obtained from the District's CAFR for the year ended June 30, 2018. (4) This estimated personal income number is calculated by taking the per capita personal income and multiplying it by the city's population. Also see note (5) regarding the per capita personal income figures. (5) Per capita personal income data is provided by the Bureau of Economic Analysis. Monticello's estimates are based on Wright County information. Wright County, where Monticello is located, is the smallest, relevant statistical tracking area. Data is subject to annual revisions by the Bureau of Economic Analysis. 108 CITY OF MONTICELLO Principal Employers Current Year and Nine Years Ago (1) The city estimates its workforce by using the city's percentage of total county population and multiplying that number by the county's total workforce. Source: City of Monticello 2018A Bond Statement and 2009 City of Monticello CAFR 109 2018 2009 Percentage of Percentage of Total City Total City Employer Employees Rank Employment (1) Employees Rank Employment (1) Xcel Energy (Northern States) 700 1 9.5% 422 3 7.1% ISD No. 882 (Monticello) 576 2 7.9% 455 2 7.6% CentraCare Medical Center (New River) 500 3 6.8% 515 1 8.6% Cargill Kitchen Solutions (Sunny Fresh) 433 4 5.9% 396 4 6.6% Wal-Mart Supercenter 325 5 4.4% 325 5 5.4% City of Monticello 188 6 2.6% 151 6 2.5% Home Depot 160 7 2.2% Target 150 8 2.0% Ultra Machine Corporation 140 9 1.9% 130 8 2.2% Cub Foods 100 10 1.4% 122 9 2.0% Denny Hecker Monticello 150 7 2.5% Monticello Clinic 98 10 1.6% 3,272 46.4% 2,764 44.8% (1) The city estimates its workforce by using the city's percentage of total county population and multiplying that number by the county's total workforce. Source: City of Monticello 2018A Bond Statement and 2009 City of Monticello CAFR 109 CITY OF MONTICELLO City Government Employees by Function/Program Last Ten Fiscal Years FT = Full-time PT = Part-time (1) Includes seasonal public works (2) Years 2007-2013 were estimated 2014 levels as data was not previously tracked. (3) Prior to 2013, the deputy registrar function was included with general government. Prior years were restated (4) Management and operations were contracted beginning July 1, 2016. Source: City of Monticello human resources department 110 Fiscal Year 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Employees by function General Fund General government 9.60 11.00 11.00 11.00 11.00 12.50 12.50 13.50 11.50 13.50 Public Safety Building Official 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 3.00 Public works Engineering 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Maintenance(1) 19.50 19.50 19.00 19.00 19.00 18.50 18.50 18.50 10.50 9.50 Culture and recreation Parks 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 13.00 10.00 Community development 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Special Revenue Funds Culture and recreation Community center -FT 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 7.50 7.50 7.50 7.50 7.50 Community center-PT(2) 36.50 36.50 36.50 36.50 36.50 36.50 36.50 36.50 38.00 40.00 Enterprise Funds Sewer/water 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 5.00 5.00 7.00 6.00 Deputy registrar(3) 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 7.50 7.00 Liquor store 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 11.50 11.50 11.50 16.00 17.00 FiberNet(4) 6.00 11.00 11.50 11.50 8.50 8.50 8.50 - - - Total 111.60 118.00 118.00 118.00 113.00 115.00 117.00 109.50 118.00 116.50 Employees by fund type General Fund 42.10 43.50 43.00 43.00 41.00 42.00 43.00 44.00 42.00 39.00 Special Revenue Funds 44.50 44.50 44.50 44.50 44.50 44.00 44.00 44.00 45.50 47.50 Enterprise Funds 25.00 30.00 30.50 30.50 27.50 29.00 30.00 21.50 30.50 30.00 111.60 118.00 118.00 118.00 113.00 115.00 117.00 109.50 118.00 116.50 FT = Full-time PT = Part-time (1) Includes seasonal public works (2) Years 2007-2013 were estimated 2014 levels as data was not previously tracked. (3) Prior to 2013, the deputy registrar function was included with general government. Prior years were restated (4) Management and operations were contracted beginning July 1, 2016. Source: City of Monticello human resources department 110 CITY OF MONTICELLO Operating Indicators by Function Last Ten Fiscal Years 111 Fiscal Year 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Function Fire Calls for service 375 282 284 237 270 286 262 270 312 265 Public works Salt (tons) 475 521 445 300 475 385 534 525 461 585 Sand (tons) 615 710 547 335 325 600 285 300 397 329 Crack sealant (pounds) 15,000 23,580 11,384 1,492 25,739 23,282 29,580 49,039 46,721 46,868 Asphalt repairs (tons of asphalt) 200 200 253 220 225 190 293 220 167 164 Culture and recreation Shade trees planted 425 150 140 220 275 270 257 280 320 305 Diseased trees removed 200 180 113 205 71 46 208 60 40 12 Trails maintained (miles) 17 17 17 17 17 18 18 20 40 40 Community center users 186,279 183,527 190,014 175,272 211,234 204,134 199,228 197,523 188,124 183,523 Program sales $ 149,829 $ 167,723 $ 168,159 $ 162,227 $ 192,708 $ 184,125 $ 213,924 $ 193,628 $ 162,461 $ 203,067 Rental revenue $ 127,612 $ 184,913 $ 154,962 $ 149,733 $ 163,329 $ 150,964 $ 154,938 $ 168,353 $ 190,343 $ 199,200 Economic development Permits issued 879 495 372 632 659 721 768 802 911 855 Permit valuation $ 11,630,000 $ 9,033,078 $ 5,333,124 $ 12,285,873 $ 15,821,223 $ 19,714,895 $ 36,242,742 $ 59,426,683 $ 43,853,123 $ 33,125,788 New single-family dwellings 9 2 2 22 52 72 44 61 64 58 Water Meters/remotes replaced 280 145 215 418 235 598 694 991 734 606 Curb box repairs (water valves) 200 200 200 100 100 100 100 100 100 50 Hydrant repair 175 175 430 300 300 203 430 250 177 159 Residential water gallons used 430,263,791 376,687,840 348,580,072 426,358,402 383,079,041 328,835,772 325,188,041 329,068,876 371,596,967 352,322,681 Avg. daily consumption (MG) 1.806 1.625 1.557 1.798 1.621 1.400 1.308 1.419 1.580 1.540 Max. daily gallons pumped (MG) 4.496 3.565 4.116 4.590 4.269 4.031 3.203 3.450 4.168 3.400 Sewer Sewage flow (MG) 390 398 431 408 392 435 417 432 445 434 Thickened sludge (wet tons) n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1,924 1,549 1,449 1,578 2,115 Thickened sludge (dry tons) n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 264 236 216 229 333 Dry tons as % of wet tons n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 0 14.9% 14.5% 15.7% Library Items checked out 219,694 248,327 228,886 237,938 263,220 199,182 195,235 190,433 182,986 182,691 Programs offered 170 164 153 149 173 169 167 212 290 287 Program participants 4,100 3,604 3,807 3,761 3,773 3,788 3,919 4,306 5,336 5,059 (continued) 111 Operating Indicators by Function Last Ten Fiscal Years (continued) Fiber optics Customers Service subscriptions TV customers Phone customers Internet customers Liquor store Transactions Average liquor sale transaction Beer sales Liquor sales Wine sales Other sales Gross profit margin % - beer Gross profit margin % - liquor Gross profit margin % - wine Annual sales increase Sunday sales (started July 2017) Deputy registrar (DMV) Motor vehicle transactions* DNR transactions Game/fish transactions Drivers licenses transactions Total transactions Dealerships serviced Net revenue per transaction CITY OF MONTICELLO N/A = Not Available MG = Millions of Gallons Notes: Indicators are not available for the general government function. State implementation of MNLARS changed how transactions are counted in 2018. Sources: Various city departments 112 Fiscal Year 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1,539 1,574 1,630 1,671 1,639 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2,755 2,656 2,589 2,528 2,388 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 813 714 641 543 458 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 582 518 461 431 386 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1,360 1,424 1,487 1,554 1,544 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 229,236 237,535 235,901 248,356 261,071 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 22 $ 22.42 $ 22.39 $ 22.42 $ 22.56 $ 2,187,948 $ 2,289,801 $ 2,328,735 $ 2,483,194 $ 2,539,168 $ 2,604,942 $ 2,763,478 $ 2,768,394 $ 2,933,853 $ 3,074,408 $ 1,214,817 $ 1,251,448 $ 1,343,109 $ 1,396,521 $ 1,506,776 $ 1,546,118 $ 1,634,198 $ 1,624,908 $ 1,739,562 $ 1,909,953 $ 575,521 $ 657,562 $ 748,908 $ 812,832 $ 860,817 $ 868,779 $ 927,732 $ 889,082 $ 894,151 $ 904,385 n/a n/a n/a n/a $ 138,854 $ 145,903 $ 166,654 $ 171,420 $ 192,615 $ 201,482 15.7% 20.4% 19.1% 20.3% 22.5% 21.4% 25.6% 21.1% 23.2% 21.4% 26.8% 29.6% 28.0% 29.3% 27.7% 30.3% 29.8% 29.0% 26.6% 29.0% 20.2% 26.8% 28.5% 31.4% 29.7% 30.7% 31.5% 32.5% 34.4% 32.5% 7.0% 2.9% 3.9% 4.1% 4.1% 2.4% 6.3% -0.7% 5.6% 5.7% n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a $ 316,281 $ 592,335 48,000 51,250 54,814 56,211 55,261 60,051 64,927 67,508 70,605 110,574 5,646 5,982 5,616 5,465 5,727 5,949 5,914 6,318 5,873 7,009 250 156 325 509 445 433 387 600 647 549 450 605 579 814 951 1,462 1,294 1,465 1,390 1,411 54,346 57,993 61,334 62,999 62,384 67,895 72,522 75,891 78,515 119,543 n/a n/a n/a n/a 19 19 19 21 26 26 n/a n/a $ 1.71 $ 2.75 $ 2.68 $ 2.91 $ 3.02 $ 3.05 $ 2.66 $ 2.21 N/A = Not Available MG = Millions of Gallons Notes: Indicators are not available for the general government function. State implementation of MNLARS changed how transactions are counted in 2018. Sources: Various city departments 112 Capital Assets Statistics by Function Last Ten Fiscal Years Function Public safety Fire Fire stations in service Number of volunteers Public works Streets (miles) Recreation and culture Parks acreage Parks Park buildings Community center (sq. ft.) Water Fire hydrants CITY OF MONTICELLO 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 68.0 68.0 68.0 68.0 68.0 68.0 68.0 68.0 69.0 70.0 180 509 635 635 696 860 326 367 367 404 20 28 28 28 28 30 30 30 30 30 11 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 18 81,000 81,000 81,000 81,000 82,000 82,000 82,000 82,000 82,000 82,000 700 700 700 700 700 700 700 700 700 700 Note: No capital asset indicators are available for the general government and economic development functions. Note: The city contributed jointly -owned land at the Bertram Chain of Lakes to Wright County in 2015. Source: Various city departments 113 CITY OF MONTICELLO Schedule of Cash Flows Adjusted for Additional City Funding of Fiber Optics Fund Last Four Fiscal Years Cash flows from operating activities Cash received from customers and users Cash paid to suppliers for goods and services Cash paid to employees Cash paid to other funds for services provided Net cash used by operating activities Cash flows from noncapital financing activities Transfers from other funds Cash flows from capital and related financing activities Sale of assets Cash flows from investing activities Interest on investments Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents Additional city funding Transfer from liquor fund 2014A debt service paid by property tax levy Adjusted net decrease in cash and cash equivalents Fiber Optics Fund Cash Flows $400,000 2016 $200,000 2018 $(200,000) $ 1,613,032 $(400,000) $ 1,679,899 $(600,000) (1,657,929) $(800,000) (1,877,048) $(1,000,000) (322,670) (18,367) 2015 2016 2015 2016 2017 2018 $ 1,733,236 $ 1,613,032 $ 1,886,377 $ 1,679,899 (1,332,231) (1,657,929) (1,955,033) (1,877,048) (565,657) (322,670) (18,367) (205) (24,291) (26,929) (1,530) (188,943) (394,496) (87,023) (198,884) 450,000 350,000 180,000 130,000 29,850 - - - 8,255 5,783 4,490 3,216 299,162 (38,713) 97,467 (65,668) (450,000) (350,000) (180,000) (130,000) (163,712) (515,519) (512,086) (512,665) $ (314,550) $ (904,232) $ (594,619) $ (708,333) 114 Net increase(decrease)in cash and . cash equivalents Transfer from liquor fund 2014A debt service paid by property tax levy Adjusted net decrease in cash and cash equivalents 2017 2018 114 BACK COVER CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA Special Purpose Audit Reports on Single Audit, Internal Controls, and Compliance With Laws and Regulations Year Ended December 31, 2018 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA Table of Contents Page Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Independent Auditor's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting and on Compliance and Other Matters Based on an Audit of Financial Statements Performed in Accordance With Government Auditing Standards 23 Independent Auditor's Report on Compliance for Each Major Federal Program; Report on Internal Control Over Compliance; and Report on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Required by the Uniform Guidance 4-6 Independent Auditor's Report on Minnesota Legal Compliance 7 Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs 8-9 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK CITY OF MONTICELLO Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Year Ended December 31, 2018 Federal Federal Grantor/Pass-Through Grantor/Program Title CFDA No. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Passed through Minnesota Public Facilities Authority Capitalization Grants for Clean Water State Revolving Funds 66.458 U.S. Department of Transportation Passed through Minnesota Department of Transportation Highway Planning and Construction 20.205 Total federal awards Federal Expenditures $ 1,006 2,100,000 $ 2,101,006 Note 1: The Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards is prepared on the accrual basis of accounting. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the OMB's Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. Therefore, some amounts presented in this schedule may differ from the amounts presented in, or used in the preparation of the City's basic financial statements. Note 2: All pass-through entities listed above use the same CFDA numbers as the federal grantors to identify these grants, and have not assigned any additional identifying numbers. Note 3: The City did not elect to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate. -1- THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK PRINCIPALS Thomas A. Karnowski, CPA Paul A. Radosevich, CPA Mt4KRWilliam J. Lauer, CPA James H. Eichten, CPA C E RT I F I E D PUBLIC Aaron J. Nielsen, CPA ACCOUNTANTS Victoria L. Holinka, CPA/CMA Jaclyn M. Huegel, CPA INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING AND ON COMPLIANCE AND OTHER MATTERS BASED ON AN AUDIT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS To the City Council and Management City of Monticello, Minnesota We have audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, the financial statements of the governmental activities, the business -type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City of Monticello, Minnesota (the City) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2018, and the related notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the City's basic financial statements, and have issued our report thereon dated May 22, 2019. INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements, we considered the City's internal control over financial reporting (internal control) to determine the audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances for the purpose of expressing our opinions on the financial statements, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the City's internal control. Accordingly, we do not express an opinion on the effectiveness of the City's internal control. A deficiency in internal control exists when the design or operation of a control does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or detect and correct, misstatements on a timely basis. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the City's financial statements will not be prevented, or detected and corrected, on a timely basis. A significant deficiency is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control that is less severe than a material weakness, yet important enough to merit attention by those charged with governance. Our consideration of internal control was for the limited purpose described in the first paragraph of this section and was not designed to identify all deficiencies in internal control that might be material weaknesses or significant deficiencies. Given these limitations, during our audit we did not identify any deficiencies in internal control that we consider to be material weaknesses. However, material weaknesses may exist that have not been identified. (continued) -2- Malloy, Montague, Karnowski, Radosevich & Co., P.A. 5353 Wayzata Boulevard • Suite 410 • Minneapolis, MN 55416 • Phone: 952-545-0424 • Fax: 952-545-0569 • www.mmkr.com COMPLIANCE AND OTHER MATTERS As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the City's financial statements are free from material misstatement, we performed tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements, noncompliance with which could have a direct and material effect on the determination of financial statement amounts. However, providing an opinion on compliance with those provisions was not an objective of our audit and, accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. The results of our tests disclosed no instances of noncompliance or other matters that are required to be reported under Government Auditing Standards. PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT The purpose of this report is solely to describe the scope of our testing of internal control and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the effectiveness of the City's internal control or on compliance. This report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards in considering the City's internal control and compliance. Accordingly, this report is not suitable for any other purpose. Minneapolis, Minnesota May 22, 2019 -3- Mt4KR CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT ON COMPLIANCE FOR PRINCIPALS Thomas A. Karnowski, CPA Paul A. Radosevich, CPA William J. Lauer, CPA James H. Eichten, CPA Aaron J. Nielsen, CPA Victoria L. Holinka, CPA/CMA Jaclyn M. Huegel, CPA EACH MAJOR FEDERAL PROGRAM, REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER COMPLIANCE, AND REPORT ON THE SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES OF FEDERAL AWARDS REOUIRED BY THE UNIFORM GUIDANCE To the City Council and Management City of Monticello, Minnesota REPORT ON COMPLIANCE FOR EACH MAJOR FEDERAL PROGRAM We have audited the City of Monticello, Minnesota's (the City) compliance with the types of compliance requirements described in the U.S. Office of Management and Budget Compliance Supplement that could have a direct and material effect on each of the City's major federal programs for the year ended December 31, 2018. The City's major federal programs are identified in the Summary of Audit Results section of the accompanying Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs. MANAGEMENT'S RESPONSIBILITY Management is responsible for compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of its federal awards applicable to its federal programs. AUDITOR'S RESPONSIBILITY Our responsibility is to express an opinion on compliance for each of the City's major federal programs based on our audit of the types of compliance requirements referred to above. We conducted our audit of compliance in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America; the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States; and the audit requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Those standards and the Uniform Guidance require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether noncompliance with the types of compliance requirements referred to above that could have a direct and material effect on a major federal program occurred. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence about the City's compliance with those requirements and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion on compliance for each major federal program. However, our audit does not provide a legal determination of the City's compliance. (continued) -4- Malloy, Montague, Karnowski, Radosevich & Co., P.A. 5353 Wayzata Boulevard • Suite 410 • Minneapolis, MN 55416 • Phone: 952-545-0424 • Fax: 952-545-0569 • www.mmkr.com OPINION ON EACH MAJOR FEDERAL PROGRAM In our opinion, the City complied, in all material respects, with the types of compliance requirements referred to on the previous page that could have a direct and material effect on each of its major federal programs for the year ended December 31, 2018. REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER COMPLIANCE Management of the City is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over compliance with the types of compliance requirements referred to on the previous page. In planning and performing our audit of compliance, we considered the City's internal control over compliance with the types of requirements that could have a direct and material effect on each major federal program to determine the auditing procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances for the purpose of expressing an opinion on compliance for each major federal program, and to test and report on internal control over compliance in accordance with the Uniform Guidance, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of internal control over compliance. Accordingly, we do not express an opinion on the effectiveness of the City's internal control over compliance. A deficiency in internal control over compliance exists when the design or operation of a control over compliance does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or detect and correct, noncompliance with a type of compliance requirement of a federal program on a timely basis. A material weakness in internal control over compliance is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over compliance, such that there is a reasonable possibility that material noncompliance with a type of compliance requirement of a federal program will not be prevented, or detected and corrected, on a timely basis. A significant deficiency in internal control over compliance is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over compliance with a type of compliance requirement of a federal program that is less severe than a material weakness in internal control over compliance, yet important enough to merit attention by those charged with governance. Our consideration of internal control over compliance was for the limited purpose described in the first paragraph of this section and was not designed to identify all deficiencies in internal control over compliance that might be material weaknesses or significant deficiencies. We did not identify any deficiencies in internal control over compliance that we consider to be material weaknesses. However, material weaknesses may exist that have not been identified. PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT The purpose of this report on internal control over compliance is solely to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over compliance and the results of that testing based on the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Accordingly, this report is not suitable for any other purpose. (continued) 511 REPORT ON SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES OF FEDERAL AWARDS REQUIRED BY THE UNIFORM GUIDANCE We have audited the financial statements of the governmental activities, the business -type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City as of and for the year ended December 31, 2018, and the related notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the City's basic financial statements. We issued our report thereon dated May 22, 2019, which contained unmodified opinions on those financial statements. Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming opinions on the financial statements that collectively comprise the basic financial statements. The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards is presented for purposes of additional analysis as required by the Uniform Guidance and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information is the responsibility of management and was derived from and relates directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the basic financial statements. The information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the financial statements and certain additional procedures, including comparing and reconciling such information directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the basic financial statements or to the basic financial statements themselves, and other additional procedures in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. In our opinion, the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the basic financial statements as a whole. 2�la&o7, Minneapolis, Minnesota May 22, 2019 -6- THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Mt4KR CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT ON MINNESOTA LEGAL COMPLIANCE To the City Council and Management City of Monticello, Minnesota PRINCIPALS Thomas A. Karnowski, CPA Paul A. Radosevich, CPA William J. Lauer, CPA James H. Eichten, CPA Aaron J. Nielsen, CPA Victoria L. Holinka, CPA/CMA Jaclyn M. Huegel, CPA We have audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, the financial statements of the governmental activities, the business -type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City of Monticello, Minnesota (the City) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2018, and the related notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the City's basic financial statements, and have issued our report thereon dated May 22, 2019. MINNESOTA LEGAL COMPLIANCE The Minnesota Legal Compliance Audit Guide for Cities, promulgated by the State Auditor pursuant to Minnesota Statutes § 6.65, contains seven categories of compliance to be tested: contracting and bidding, deposits and investments, conflicts of interest, public indebtedness, claims and disbursements, miscellaneous provisions, and tax increment financing. Our audit considered all of the listed categories. In connection with our audit, nothing came to our attention that caused us to believe that the City failed to comply with the provisions of the Minnesota Legal Compliance Audit Guide for Cities, except as described in the Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs as item 2018-001. However, our audit was not directed primarily toward obtaining knowledge of such noncompliance. Accordingly, had we performed additional procedures, other matters may have come to our attention regarding the City's noncompliance with the above referenced provisions. CITY'S RESPONSE TO FINDING The City's response to the legal compliance finding identified in our audit has been included in the Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs. The City's response was not subject to the auditing procedures applied in our audit of the financial statements and, accordingly, we express no opinion on it. PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT The purpose of this report is solely to describe the scope of our testing of compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on compliance. Accordingly, this report is not suitable for any other purpose. Minneapolis, Minnesota May 22, 2019 -7- Malloy, Montague, Karnowski, Radosevich & Co., P.A. 5353 Wayzata Boulevard • Suite 410 • Minneapolis, MN 55416 • Phone: 952-545-0424 • Fax: 952-545-0569 • www.mmkr.com CITY OF MONTICELLO Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs December 31, 2018 A. SUMMARY OF AUDIT RESULTS This summary is formatted to provide federal granting agencies and pass-through agencies answers to specific questions regarding the audit of federal awards. Financial Statements What type of auditor's report is issued? X Unmodified Qualified Adverse Disclaimer Internal control over financial reporting: Material weakness(es) identified? Significant deficiency(ies) identified? Noncompliance material to the financial statements noted? Federal Awards Internal controls over major federal award programs: Material weakness(es) identified? Significant deficiency(ies) identified? Type of auditor's report issued on compliance for major programs? Any audit findings disclosed that are required to be reported in accordance with 2 CFR 200.516(a)? Programs tested as major programs: Program or Cluster U.S. Department of Transportation Passed through Minnesota Department of Transportation Highway Planning and Construction Threshold for distinguishing between type A and B programs Does the auditee qualify as a low-risk auditee? Yes X No Yes X None reported Yes X No Yes X No Yes X None reported X Unmodified Qualified Adverse Disclaimer Yes X No CFDA No. 20.205 $ 750,000 Yes X No CITY OF MONTICELLO Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) December 31, 2018 B. FINANCIAL STATEMENT FINDINGS None. C. FEDERAL AWARD FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS None. D. MINNESOTA LEGAL COMPLIANCE FINDINGS 2018-001 UNTIMELY DISBURSEMENT TO VOLUNTEER FIRE RELIEF ASSOCIATION Criteria — Minnesota Statutes § 69.031 and § 423A.022, Subd. 2, states that annually, the commissioner of revenue shall allocate police and firefighter retirement state aid. Of the total amount appropriated as state aid, a percentage is paid to the executive director of the Public Employees Retirement Association for deposit in the Public Employees Police and Fire Retirement Fund. A percentage is then paid to municipalities that qualify to receive fire state aid in that calendar year. For municipalities that are allocated amounts for fire departments participating in the voluntary state-wide lump sum volunteer firefighter retirement plans, this balance is required to be paid to the treasurer of each municipality for transmittal within 30 days of receipt to the treasurer of the applicable volunteer firefighter relief association for deposit in its Special Fund. Condition — For the 2018 allocation of this aid to the City of Monticello, Minnesota (the City), the City did not pay the fire relief association prior to the 30 -day period set by Minnesota Statutes. Questioned Costs — None. Context — Pass-through payments to the fire relief pension were not made within the 30 -day required time period. Repeat Finding — This is a current year finding only. Cause — This was an oversight by city personnel. Effect — The City was not in compliance with Minnesota Statutes § 69.031 and § 423A.022, Subd. 2. Recommendation — We recommend that the City follow Minnesota Statutes § 69.031 and § 423A.022, Subd. 2 and disburse funds received from the state of Minnesota to the volunteer firefighter relief association within the 30 -day time period. View of Responsible Official and Planned Corrective Action — There is no disagreement with the audit finding. The payment of the balance required to be paid was made 37 days after receipt, 7 days beyond the 30 -day requirement. The City plans to comply with Minnesota Statutes § 69.031 and § 423A.022, Subd. 2 in the future. The City has separately issued a corrective action plan related to this finding. In THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Management Report for City of Monticello, Minnesota December 31, 2018 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Mt4KR CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS To the City Council and Management City of Monticello, Minnesota PRINCIPALS Thomas A. Karnowski, CPA Paul A. Radosevich, CPA William J. Lauer, CPA James H. Eichten, CPA Aaron J. Nielsen, CPA Victoria L. Holinka, CPA/CMA Jaclyn M. Huegel, CPA We have prepared this management report in conjunction with our audit of the City of Monticello, Minnesota's (the City) financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2018. We have organized this report into the following sections: • Audit Summary • Governmental Funds Overview • Enterprise Funds Overview • Government -Wide Financial Statements • Legislative Updates • Accounting and Auditing Updates We would be pleased to further discuss any of the information contained in this report or any other concerns that you would like us to address. We would also like to express our thanks for the courtesy and assistance extended to us during the course of our audit. The purpose of this report is solely to provide those charged with governance of the City, management, and those who have responsibility for oversight of the financial reporting process comments resulting from our audit process and information relevant to city finances in Minnesota. Accordingly, this report is not suitable for any other purpose. Minneapolis, Minnesota May 22, 2019 Malloy, Montague, Karnowski, Radosevich & Co., P.A. 5353 Wayzata Boulevard • Suite 410 • Minneapolis, MN 55416 • Phone: 952-545-0424 • Fax: 952-545-0569 • www.mmkr.com THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK AUDIT SUMMARY The following is a summary of our audit work, key conclusions, and other information that we consider important or that is required to be communicated to the City Council, administration, or those charged with governance of the City. OUR RESPONSIBILITY UNDER AUDITING STANDARDS GENERALLY ACCEPTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS, AND TITLE 2 U.S. CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS PART 200, UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS, COST PRINCIPLES, AND AUDIT REQUIREMENTS FOR FEDERAL AWARDS (UNIFORM GUIDANCE) We have audited the financial statements of the governmental activities, the business -type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City as of and for the year ended December 31, 2018. Professional standards require that we provide you with information about our responsibilities under auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, Government Auditing Standards, and the Uniform Guidance, as well as certain information related to the planned scope and timing of our audit. We have communicated such information to you verbally and in our audit engagement letter. Professional standards also require that we communicate the following information related to our audit. PLANNED SCOPE AND TIMING OF THE AUDIT We performed the audit according to the planned scope and timing previously discussed and coordinated in order to obtain sufficient audit evidence and complete an effective audit. AUDIT OPINION AND FINDINGS Based on our audit of the City's financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2018: • We have issued an unmodified opinion on the City's basic financial statements. Our report included a paragraph emphasizing the City's implementation of Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement No. 75, Accounting and Financial Reporting for Postemployment Benefits Other Than Pensions during the year ended December 31, 2018. Our opinion was not modified with respect to this matter. We reported no deficiencies in the City's internal control over financial reporting that we considered to be material weaknesses. The results of our testing disclosed no instances of noncompliance required to be reported under Government Auditing Standards. • We reported that the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the basic financial statements. • The results of our tests indicate that the City has complied, in all material respects, with the types of compliance requirements that could have a direct and material effect on each of its major federal programs. • We reported no deficiencies in the City's internal controls over compliance that we considered to be material weaknesses with the types of compliance requirements that could have a direct and material effect on each of its major federal programs. -1- • We reported one finding based on our testing of the City's compliance with Minnesota laws and regulations as follows: o Minnesota Statutes § 69.031 and § 423A.022, Subd. 2 states that annually, the commissioner of revenue shall allocate police and firefighter retirement supplemental state aid. Of the total amount appropriated as supplemental state aid, a percentage is paid to the executive director of the Public Employees Retirement Association for deposit in the Public Employees Police and Fire Retirement Fund. A percentage is then paid to municipalities that qualify to receive fire state aid in that calendar year. For municipalities that are allocated amounts for fire departments participating in the voluntary state-wide lump sum volunteer firefighter retirement plans, this balance is required to be paid to the treasurer of each municipality for transmittal within 30 days of receipt to the treasurer of the applicable volunteer firefighter relief association for deposit in its Special Fund. For the 2018 allocation of this aid to the City, the City did not pay the fire relief association prior to the 30 -day period set by Minnesota Statutes. The payment of the balance required to be paid was made 37 days after receipt, 7 days beyond the 30 -day requirement. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Management is responsible for the selection and use of appropriate accounting policies. The significant accounting policies used by the City are described in Note 1 of the notes to basic financial statements. No new accounting policies were adopted and the application of existing policies was not changed during the year ended December 31, 2018; however, the City implemented the following governmental accounting standards during the fiscal year: • GASB Statement No. 75, Accounting and Financial Reporting for Postemployment Benefits Other Than Pensions, which established new accounting and financial reporting requirements for governments whose employees are provided with other post -employment benefits (OPEB). • GASB Statement No. 85, Omnibus 2017, which addresses issues that have been identified during implementation and application of certain GASB statements. We noted no transactions entered into by the City during the year for which there is a lack of authoritative guidance or consensus. All significant transactions have been recognized in the financial statements in the proper period. ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES AND MANAGEMENT JUDGMENTS Accounting estimates are an integral part of the financial statements prepared by management and are based on management's knowledge and experience about past and current events and assumptions about future events. Certain accounting estimates are particularly sensitive because of their significance to the financial statements and because of the possibility that future events affecting them may differ significantly from those expected. The most sensitive estimates affecting the financial statements were: • Depreciation — Management's estimates of depreciation expense are based on the estimated useful lives of the assets. Other Post -Employment Benefit (OPEB) and Pension Liabilities — The City has recorded liabilities and activity for pension benefits and OPEB. These obligations are calculated using actuarial methodologies described in GASB Statement Nos. 68 and 75. These actuarial calculations include significant assumptions, including projected changes, healthcare insurance costs, investment returns, retirement ages, proportionate share, and employee turnover. -2- Land Held for Resale — These assets are stated at the lower of cost or acquisition value based on management's estimates. • Compensated Absences — Management's estimate is based on current rates of pay, and vacation, sick, paid time off, and compensation time balances. We evaluated the key factors and assumptions used by management to develop these estimates in determining that they are reasonable in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The financial statement disclosures are neutral, consistent, and clear. DIFFICULTIES ENCOUNTERED IN PERFORMING THE AUDIT We encountered no significant difficulties in dealing with management in performing and completing our audit. CORRECTED AND UNCORRECTED MISSTATEMENTS Professional standards require us to accumulate all known and likely misstatements identified during the audit, other than those that are clearly trivial, and communicate them to the appropriate level of management. There were no misstatements detected as a result of audit procedures that were material, either individually or in the aggregate, to each opinion unit's financial statements taken as a whole. DISAGREEMENTS WITH MANAGEMENT For purposes of this report, a disagreement with management is a financial accounting, reporting, or auditing matter, whether or not resolved to our satisfaction, that could be significant to the financial statements or the auditor's report. We are pleased to report that no such disagreements arose during the course of our audit. MANAGEMENT REPRESENTATIONS We have requested certain representations from management that are included in the management representation letter dated May 22, 2019. MANAGEMENT CONSULTATIONS WITH OTHER INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS In some cases, management may decide to consult with other accountants about auditing and accounting matters, similar to obtaining a "second opinion" on certain situations. If a consultation involves application of an accounting principle to the City's financial statements or a determination of the type of auditor's opinion that may be expressed on those statements, our professional standards require the consulting accountant to check with us to determine that the consultant has all the relevant facts. To our knowledge, there were no such consultations with other accountants. OTHER AUDIT FINDINGS OR ISSUES We generally discuss a variety of matters, including the application of accounting principles and auditing standards, with management each year prior to retention as the City's auditors. However, these discussions occurred in the normal course of our professional relationship and our responses were not a condition to our retention. OTHER MATTERS We applied certain limited procedures to the management's discussion and analysis (MD&A), the budgetary comparison schedules, and the pension and OPEB-related required supplementary information (RSI) that supplements the basic financial statements. Our procedures consisted of inquiries of management regarding the methods of preparing the information and comparing the information for consistency with management's responses to our inquiries, the basic financial statements, and other knowledge we obtained during our audit of the basic financial statements. We did not audit the RSI and do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on the RSI. We were engaged to report on the combining and individual fund financial statements and schedules accompanying the financial statements, and the separately issued Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards, which are not RSI. With respect to this supplementary information, we made certain inquiries of management and evaluated the form, content, and methods of preparing the information to determine that the information complies with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, the method of preparing it has not changed from the prior period, and the information is appropriate and complete in relation to our audit of the financial statements. We compared and reconciled the supplementary information to the underlying accounting records used to prepare the financial statements or to the financial statements themselves. We were not engaged to report on the introductory and statistical sections, which accompany the financial statements, but are not RSI. Such information has not been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, accordingly, we do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on it. -4- GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS OVERVIEW This section of the report provides you with an overview of the financial trends and activities of the City's governmental funds, which include the General, special revenue, debt service, and capital project funds. These funds are used to account for the basic services the City provides to all of its citizens, which are financed primarily with property taxes. The governmental fund information in the City's financial statements focuses on budgetary compliance, and the sufficiency of each governmental fund's current assets to finance its current liabilities. PROPERTY TAXES Minnesota cities rely heavily on local property tax levies to support their governmental fund activities. For the 2017 fiscal year, local ad valorem property tax levies provided 41.1 percent of the total governmental fund revenues for cities over 2,500 in population, and 37.4 percent for cities under 2,500 in population. Total property taxes levied by all Minnesota cities for taxes payable in 2018 increased 6.2 percent from the prior year, and total certified levies payable in 2019 are projected to increase by 5.6 percent. The total market value of property in Minnesota cities increased about 5.6 percent for the 2017 levy year (state-wide market value information for the 2018 levy year was not available at the time this report was issued). The market values used for levying property taxes are based on the previous fiscal year (e.g., market values for taxes levied in 2018 were based on assessed values as of January 1, 2017), so the trend of change in these market values lags somewhat behind the housing market and economy in general. The City's taxable market value increased 6.8 percent for taxes payable in 2017 and 7.3 percent for taxes payable in 2018. The following graph shows the City's changes in taxable market value over the past 10 years: $2,000,000,000 $1,800,000,000 $1,600,000,000 $1,400,000,000 $1,200,000,000 $1,000,000,000 $800,000,000 $600,000,000 $400,000,000 $200,000,000 Total Market Value 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 -5- Tax capacity is considered the actual base available for taxation. It is calculated by applying the state's property classification system to each property's market value. Each property classification, such as commercial or residential, has a different calculation and uses different rates. Consequently, a city's total tax capacity will change at a different rate than its total market value, as tax capacity is affected by the proportion of its tax base that is in each property classification from year-to-year, as well as legislative changes to tax rates. The City's tax capacity increased 6.5 percent and 6.9 percent for taxes payable in 2017 and 2018, respectively. The following graph shows the City's change in tax capacities over the past 10 years: Net Tax Capacity $35,000,000 $30,000,000 $25,000,000 $20,000,000 $15,000,000 $10,000,000 $5,000,000 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 The following table presents the average tax rates applied to city residents for each of the last three levy years: Rates Expressed as a Percentage of Net Tax Capacity City of Monticello 2016 2017 2018 Average tax rate City 34.5 33.2 32.3 County 40.0 39.6 40.0 School 20.9 16.2 15.6 Special taxing 1.1 1.0 1.1 Total 96.5 90.0 89.0 -6- GOVERNMENTAL FUND BALANCES The following table summarizes the changes in the fund balances of the City's governmental funds during the year ended December 31, 2018, presented both by fund balance classification and by major fund: Governmental Fund Changes in Fund Balance Fund balances of governmental funds Total by classification Nonspendable Restricted Assigned Unassigned Total governmental funds Total by fund Major funds General Community Center Economic Development Authority Debt Service Capital Projects Nonmaj or funds Total governmental funds Fund Balance as of December 31, Increase 2017 2018 (Decrease) $ 134,357 $ 172,264 $ 37,907 7,924,461 5,867,997 (2,056,464) 16,910,080 17,145,463 235,383 6,918,224 6,984,828 66,604 $ 31,887,122 $ 30,170,552 $ (1,716,570) $ 7,029,093 $ 7,109,478 $ 80,385 580,513 606,795 26,282 7,468,105 7,240,465 (227,640) 2,800,980 2,391,544 (409,436) 8,473,508 7,527,500 (946,008) 5,534,923 5,294,770 (240,153) $ 31,887,122 $ 30,170,552 $ (1,716,570) In total, the fund balances of the City's governmental funds decreased by $1,716,570 during the year ended December 31, 2018. The majority of the decrease was due to capital expenditures for the Fallon Avenue overpass project. de GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS REVENUE AND EXPENDITURES The following table presents the per capita revenue of the City's governmental funds for the past three years, along with state-wide averages. We have included the most recent comparative state-wide averages available from the Office of the State Auditor to provide a benchmark for interpreting the City's data. The amounts received from the typical major sources of governmental fund revenue will naturally vary between cities based on factors such as a city's stage of development, location, size and density of its population, property values, services it provides, and other attributes. It will also differ from year-to-year, due to the effect of inflation and changes in its operation. Also, certain data in these tables may be classified differently than how they appear in the City's financial statements in order to be more comparable to the state-wide information, particularly in separating capital expenditures from current expenditures. We have designed this section of our management report using per capita data in order to better identify unique or unusual trends and activities of the City. We intend for this type of comparative and trend information to complement, rather than duplicate, information in the MD&A. An inherent difficulty in presenting per capita information is the accuracy of the population count, which for most years is based on estimates. Governmental Funds Revenue per Capita With State -Wide Averages by Population Class The City has generated more property tax revenue from its governmental funds compared to the average Minnesota city. The City's per capita governmental funds revenue for 2018 was $1,174, a decrease of about 2.9 percent from the prior year. Intergovernmental revenue decreased $33 per capita, mainly due to a portion of the City's intergovernmental grants and aid not being recognized as revenue until available in calendar 2021. State -Wide City of Monticello Year December 31, 2017 2016 2017 2018 Population 2,500-10,000 10,000-20,000 20,000-100,000 13,299 13,409 13,553 Property taxes $ 474 $ 451 $ 475 $ 699 $ 715 $ 735 Tax increments 26 27 38 50 48 47 Franchise fees and other taxes 38 43 48 31 33 29 Special assessments 57 48 59 74 71 52 Licenses and permits 39 34 49 50 45 37 Intergovernmental revenues 322 276 147 153 100 67 Charges for services 108 103 103 167 142 155 Other 68 53 48 73 55 52 Total revenue $ 1,132 $ 1,035 $ 967 $ 1,297 $ 1,209 $ 1,174 The City has generated more property tax revenue from its governmental funds compared to the average Minnesota city. The City's per capita governmental funds revenue for 2018 was $1,174, a decrease of about 2.9 percent from the prior year. Intergovernmental revenue decreased $33 per capita, mainly due to a portion of the City's intergovernmental grants and aid not being recognized as revenue until available in calendar 2021. The expenditures of governmental funds will also vary from state-wide averages and from year-to-year, based on the City's circumstances. Expenditures are classified into three types as follows: • Current — These are typically the general operating type expenditures occurring on an annual basis, and are primarily funded by general sources, such as taxes and intergovernmental revenues. • Capital Outlay and Construction — These expenditures do not occur on a consistent basis, more typically fluctuating significantly from year-to-year. Many of these expenditures are project -oriented, and are often funded by specific sources that have benefited from the expenditure, such as special assessment improvement projects. • Debt Service — Although the expenditures for debt service may be relatively consistent over the term of the respective debt, the funding source is the important factor. Some debt may be repaid through specific sources, such as special assessments or redevelopment funding, while other debt may be repaid with general property taxes. The City's expenditures per capita of its governmental funds for the past three years, together with comparative state-wide averages, are presented in the following table: Governmental Funds Expenditures per Capita With State -Wide Averages by Population Class The City's governmental funds current per capita expenditures are higher than state-wide averages for cities in the same population class. The City's per capita expenditures for capital outlay and construction increased significantly from the prior year and will vary on a yearly basis depending on current and ongoing capital projects. Debt service costs have been significantly higher than other cities state-wide, due to the stage of development of the City. IN State -Wide City of Monticello Year December 31, 2017 2016 2017 2018 Population 2,500-10,000 10,000-20,000 20,000-100,000 13,299 13,409 13,553 Current General government $ 147 $ 120 S 101 $ 112 $ 121 $ 122 Public safety 270 259 287 153 162 174 Street maintenance and lighting 128 127 101 146 150 153 Recreation and culture 96 112 99 207 219 224 All other 76 64 77 88 82 136 717 682 665 706 734 809 Capital outlay and construction 403 319 263 469 405 716 Debt service Principal 228 147 121 427 292 169 Interest and fiscal charges 44 35 32 48 42 45 272 182 153 475 334 214 Total expenditures $ 1,392 $ 1,183 $ 1,081 $ 1,650 $ 1,473 $ 1,739 The City's governmental funds current per capita expenditures are higher than state-wide averages for cities in the same population class. The City's per capita expenditures for capital outlay and construction increased significantly from the prior year and will vary on a yearly basis depending on current and ongoing capital projects. Debt service costs have been significantly higher than other cities state-wide, due to the stage of development of the City. IN GENERAL FUND The City's General Fund accounts for the financial activity of the basic services provided to the community. The primary services included within this fund are the administration of the municipal operation, police and fire protection, building inspection, streets and highway maintenance, and parks and recreation. The graph below illustrates the change in the General Fund financial position over the last five years. We have also included a line representing annual expenditures to reflect the change in the size of the General Fund operation over the same period. $9,000,000 $ 8,000,000 $7,000,000 $6,000,000 $5,000,000 $4,000,000 $3,000,000 $2,000,000 $1,000,000 Fund Balance O Cash Balance Expenditures General Fund Financial Position Year Ended December 31, 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 $4,331,058 $4,639,206 $6,409,507 $4,986,796 $5,649,254 $6,715,369 $6,276,720 $7,091,381 $6,992,812 $7,029,093 $8,130,998 $7,442,697 $ 7,109,478 $7,513,518 $7,924,408 The City's General Fund cash and investments balance at December 31, 2018 was $7,513,518, which decreased $617,480 from 2017 as escrow deposits declined in calendar 2018. Total fund balance at December 31, 2018 was $7,109,478, up $80,385 from the prior year. This fund balance level represents 89.7 percent of the City's annual General Fund expenditures, based on 2018 expenditure levels. The City's adopted fund balance policy requires that the City set aside fund balance to represent 75.0 percent of expenditures for working capital and contingencies. Having an appropriate fund balance is an important factor because a government, like any organization, requires a certain amount of equity to operate. Generally, the amount of equity required typically increases as the size of the operation increases. A healthy financial position also allows the City to avoid volatility in tax rates; helps minimize the impact of state funding changes; allows for the adequate and consistent funding of services, repairs, and unexpected costs; and can be a factor in determining the City's bond rating and resulting interest costs. -10- The following graph reflects the City's General Fund revenue sources for 2018 compared to budget: Property Taxes Licenses and Permits Intergovernmental Charges for Services Other General Fund Revenue Budget and Actual 000 s� 000 s00 ,°� ,s00 s00 000 °0 190 190 190 'O2 0 190 190 'Oo 190 190 'Oo 'Oo 'Oo 'Oo 0 0 0 0 0 ■ Budget ■ Actual Total General Fund revenues for 2018 were $8,689,793, which was $402,793 (4.9 percent) over the final budget. As reflected in the table above, charges for services were over budget by $111,064, which was due to an established residential garbage charge and an increase in rates at the community center. Other revenue also exceeded budgeted amounts by $106,243, due to conservative budgeting for contributions and reimbursements. The following graph presents the City's General Fund revenues by source for the last five years. The graph reflects the City's reliance on property taxes and other local sources of revenue. $7,000,000 $6,500,000 $6,000,000 $5,500,000 $5,000,000 $4,500,000 $4,000,000 $3,500,000 $3,000,000 $2,500,000 $2,000,000 $1,500,000 $1,000,000 $500,000 ■ 2014 ■ 2015 ❑ 2016 ■ 2017 M 201 General Fund Revenue by Source Year Ended December 31, Taxes Intergovernmental Other $5,527,958 $320,691 $1,270,353 $5,906,255 $354,679 $1,376,712 $6,204,429 $389,005 $1,678,122 $6,384,444 $429,697 $1,679,204 $6,634,769 $428,443 $1,626,581 The graph reflects the City's increasing reliance on taxes to finance its General Fund operations. Overall, General Fund revenues increased $196,448 (2.3 percent) from the previous year. Property taxes increased $250,325, due to an increase in the General Fund tax levy. -11- The following graphs illustrate the components of General Fund spending for 2018 compared to budget: General Government Public Safety Public Works Recreation and Culture Other General Fund Expenditures Budget and Actual ,r, T T T, T T T `8I T T `fid 'fid & o 2Cb �°0 60 °o O°o °o °o 00 00 00 00 o o°o o°o o°o o o o o ■ Budget ■ Actual Total General Fund expenditures for 2018 were $7,924,408, which was $362,592 (4.4 percent) under budget. The public works area was under budget by $290,100, mainly due to a partial -year position vacancy, savings from hiring an internal engineer, and overall conscious spending. The following graph presents the City's General Fund expenditures by function for the last five years: $2,500,000 $2,250,000 $2,000,000 $1,750,000 $1,500,000 $1,250,000 $1,000,000 $750,000 $500,000 $250,000 1112014 ■ 2015 ❑ 2016 ■ 2017 ■ 2018 General Fund Expenditures by Function Year Ended December 31, FM_] General Public Safety Public Works Recreation and Other Governmental Culture $1,450,930 $1,845,073 $1,792,870 $802,678 $517,956 $1,465,458 $1,972,986 $1,709,063 $964,385 $603,477 $1,489,892 $2,036,777 $1,802,884 $1,021,709 $641,550 $1,617,680 $2,178,728 $1,904,391 $1,124,379 $617,519 $1,656,557 $2,354,453 $2,079,091 $1,200,388 $633,919 Overall, General Fund expenditures increased $481,711 (6.5 percent) from the prior year. All General Fund expenditure functions increased in 2018, with the largest change in public safety ($175,725), due to an increase in police hours and contract rates, in addition to a new fire marshal position. Public works increased $174,700 for costs related to streets, and snow and ice removal. -12- ENTERPRISE FUNDS OVERVIEW The City maintains several enterprise funds to account for services the City provides that are financed primarily through fees charged to those utilizing the service. This section of the report provides you with an overview of the financial trends and activities of the City's enterprise funds, which includes the Water Utility, Sewage Utility, Liquor Operations, Fiber Optics, and Deputy Registrar Funds. ENTERPRISE FUNDS FINANCIAL POSITION The following table summarizes the changes in the financial position of the City's enterprise funds during the year ended December 31, 2018, presented both by classification and by fund: Enterprise Funds Change in Financial Position Net Position as of December 31, Increase 2017 2018 (Decrease) Net position of enterprise funds Total by classification Net investment in capital assets $ 39,944,797 $ 39,250,211 $ (694,586) Unrestricted 11,832,010 13,166,083 1,334,073 Total enterprise funds $ 51,776,807 $ 52,416,294 $ 639,487 Total by fund Water $ 14,823,165 $ 14,782,772 $ (40,393) Sewage 21,436,849 22,110,771 673,922 Liquor 1,626,362 1,776,378 150,016 Fiber Optics 13,050,807 12,643,701 (407,106) Deputy Registrar 839,624 1,102,672 263,048 Total enterprise funds $ 51,776,807 $ 52,416,294 $ 639,487 In total, the net position of the City's enterprise funds increased by $639,487 during the year ended December 31, 2018, which includes a change in accounting principle which decreased net position by $79,984. The decline in the net investment in capital assets relates to depreciation expense being higher than the payments on the related debt. The increase in unrestricted net position is a result of positive operations in these funds. -13- WATER ENTERPRISE FUND The following graph presents five years of comparative operating results for the City's Water Enterprise Fund: $1,500,000 $1,400,000 $1,300,000 $1,200,000 $1,100,000 $1,000,000 $900,000 $800,000 $700,000 $600,000 $500,000 $400,000 $300,000 $200,000 $100,000 $— Oper Rev 0 Oper Exp Oper Inc Before Dep Water Enterprise Fund Year Ended December 31, 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 $1,117,226 $1,126,718 $1,172,258 $1,415,441 $1,432,194 $1,086,006 $1,105,230 $1,172,236 $1,160,339 $1,238,586 $545,930 $535,302 $502,469 $778,909 $712,808 At December 31, 2018, the Water Enterprise Fund had a cash balance of $5,114,048 and a net position of $14,782,772. Net position consisted of $9,422,914 in net investment in capital assets and $5,359,858 in unrestricted net position. Operating revenue in the Water Enterprise Fund is $1,432,194, an increase of $16,753 from the prior year. Operating expenses for 2018 were $1,238,586, an increase of $78,247, due to higher material, supply, and other service costs. It is important that this fund continue to have positive operating results so as not to place an additional burden on other city funds. It is also important that the City continue to monitor water rates so that they are designed to also provide for future repairs and replacement of the infrastructure assets. -14- SEWAGE ENTERPRISE FUND The following graph presents five years of comparative operating results for the City's Sewage Enterprise Fund: $3,000,000 $2,750,000 $2,500,000 $2,250,000 $2,000,000 $1,750,000 $1,500,000 $1,250,000 $1,000,000 $750,000 $500,000 $250,000 Oper Rev o Oper Exp Oper Inc Before Dep Sewage Enterprise Fund Year Ended December 31, 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 $2,081,660 $2,083,122 $2,223,252 $2,472,774 $2,581,833 $2,676,729 $2,582,554 $2,554,310 $2,644,096 $2,857,968 $511,463 $603,965 $811,421 $920,157 $907,405 At December 31, 2018, the Sewage Enterprise Fund had a cash balance of $5,010,271 and a net position balance of $22,110,771. Net position consisted of $17,387,264 in net investment in capital assets and $4,723,507 of unrestricted net position. Sewage Enterprise Fund operating revenues for 2018 were $2,581,833, which is $109,059 more than the previous year, due to increased rates and usage. Operating expenses for 2018 were $2,857,968, which increased $213,872 from 2017 mainly from increased materials, supplies, and depreciation on capital assets. It is important that this fund continue to have positive operating results so as not to place an additional burden on other city funds. It is also important that the City continue to monitor sewage rates so they are designed to also provide for future repairs and replacement of infrastructure assets. -15- LIQUOR ENTERPRISE FUND The following graph presents five years of comparative operating results for the Liquor Enterprise Fund: Liquor Enterprise Fund Year Ended December 31, $6,400,000 $6,000,000 $5,600,000 $5,200,000 $4,800,000 $4,400,000 $4,000,000 $3,600,000 $3,200,000 $2,800,000 $2,400,000 $2,000,000 $1,600,000 $1,200,000 $800,000 $400,000 $— 1� Sales C-1 Cost of Sales Operating Expenses — Operating Income (Loss) 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 $5,165,737 $5,489,430 $5,448,584 $5,751,197 $6,086,293 $3,876,697 $3,969,587 $4,041,224 $4,230,016 $4,546,747 $694,567 $801,545 $836,048 $880,415 $854,218 $594,802 $722,793 $573,358 $644,735 $690,016 The Liquor Enterprise Fund ended 2018 with a net position balance of $1,776,378, an increase of $150,016 from the prior year, which includes a change in accounting principle. Of the net position balance, $139,210 represents the investment in liquor capital assets, leaving $1,637,168 of unrestricted net position. Liquor sales for 2018 were $6,086,293, an increase of $335,096 from last year. The Liquor Enterprise Fund generated a gross profit of $1,539,546 in 2018, or about 25.3 percent of gross sales, a slight decrease from 26.4 percent in 2017. Operating expenses for 2018 were $854,218, a decrease of $26,197 from last year. Iffel FIBER OPTICS ENTERPRISE FUND The following graph presents five years of comparative operating results for the Fiber Optics Enterprise Fund: $3,000,000 $2,500,000 71 $2,000,000 $1,500,000 $1,000,000 $500,000 $(500,000) Fiber Optics Enterprise Fund Year Ended December 31, $(1,000,000) 2017 2018 $1,739,566 2014 2015 Oper Rev $1,761,978 $1,642,403 0 Oper Exp $2,811,084 $2,429,792 Oper Inc (Loss) $(606,176) $(367,607) Before Dep 2016 2017 2018 $1,739,566 $1,757,134 $1,736,243 $2,490,920 $2,252,287 $2,276,565 $(331,799) $(82,234) $(141,524) At December 31, 2018, the Fiber Optics Enterprise Fund had a cash balance of $334,807 and a net position balance of $12,643,701. Net position consisted of $12,243,839 in net investment in capital assets and $399,862 of unrestricted net position. Operating revenue in this fund was $1,736,243, a decrease of $20,891, or 1.2 percent, in 2018. Operating expenses for 2018 were $2,276,565, an increase of $24,278 from last year. In 2018, the operating loss in this fund before depreciation was $141,524. This operating loss was higher by $59,290 in the current year, mostly related to increased operating expenses. We recommend the City continue to monitor the financial results of this fund. The continued monitoring of this fund would include a discussion on how the current financial results compare to the future strategic plan for this fund. -17- DEPUTY REGISTRAR ENTERPRISE FUND The following graph presents five years of comparative operating results for the City's Deputy Registrar Enterprise Fund: Deputy Registrar Fund Year Ended December 31, $750,000 $700,000 $650,000 $600,000 $550,000 $500,000 $450,000 $400,000 $350,000 $300,000 $250,000 $200,000 $150,000 $100,000 $50,000 Oper Rev Oper Exp Oper Inc (Loss) Before Dep 2014 2015 2016 $497,798 $535,931 $562,891 $302,709 $318,686 $352,117 $198,274 $220,430 $213,959 2017 2018 $594,777 $694,263 $398,054 $429,683 $201,132 $268,985 At December 31, 2018, the Deputy Registrar Enterprise Fund had a cash balance of $1,338,676 and a net position balance of $1,102,672. Net position consisted of $56,984 in net investment in capital assets and $1,045,688 of unrestricted net position. Deputy Registrar Enterprise Fund operating revenues for 2018 were $694,263, which is $99,486 more than the previous year, mostly due to an increase in charges for services. Operating expenses for 2018 were $429,683, which is $31,629 higher than 2017, due to increased personal services. at -M GOVERNMENT -WIDE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS In addition to fund -based information, the current reporting model for governmental entities also requires the inclusion of two government -wide financial statements designed to present a clear picture of the City as a single, unified entity. These government -wide financial statements provide information on the total cost of delivering services, including capital assets and long-term liabilities. STATEMENT OF NET POSITION The Statement of Net Position essentially tells you what the City owns and owes at a given point in time, the last day of the fiscal year. Theoretically, net position represents the resources the City has leftover to use for providing services after its debts are settled. However, those resources are not always in spendable form, or there may be restrictions on how some of those resources can be used. Therefore, net position is divided into three components: net investment in capital assets, restricted, and unrestricted. The following table presents the components of the City's net position as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, for governmental activities and business -type activities: December 31, 2017 Net position Governmental activities Net investment in capital assets $ 41,535,637 Restricted 11,599,951 Unrestricted 20,899,110 Total governmental activities 74,034,698 Business -type activities Net investment in capital assets 39,944,797 Unrestricted 11,905,058 Total business -type activities 51,849,855 Total net position $ 125,884,553 2018 $ 43,517,983 9,649,085 23,422,548 76,589,616 39,250,211 13,261,505 52,511,716 $ 129,101,332 Increase (Decrease) 1,982,346 (1,950,866) 2,523,438 2,554,918 (694,586) 1,356,447 661,861 3,216,779 The City's total net position at December 31, 2018 was $3,216,779 higher than the prior year. Of the increase, $2,554,918 came from governmental activities and $661,861 from business -type activities. The increase in net investment in capital assets and decrease in restricted net position in the governmental activities is mostly from the use of restricted assets for capital improvements. The changes in business -type activities net position were discussed earlier in this report. At the end of the current fiscal year, the City is able to present positive balances in all three categories of net position, both for the government as a whole, as well as for its separate governmental and business -type activities. The same situation held true for the prior year. IMI STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES The Statement of Activities tracks the City's yearly revenues and expenses, as well as any other transactions that increase or reduce total net position. These amounts represent the full cost of providing services. The Statement of Activities provides a more comprehensive measure than just the amount of cash that changed hands, as reflected in the fund -based financial statements. This statement includes the cost of supplies used, depreciation of long-lived capital assets, and other accrual -based expenses. The following table presents the change in the net position of the City for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017: Net (expense) revenue Governmental activities General government Public safety Public works Sanitation Transit Recreation and culture Economic development Interest and fiscal charges Business -type activities Water Sewage Liquor Fiber Optics Deputy Registrar Total net (expense) revenue General revenues Property taxes and tax increments Investment earnings Otherrevenues Total general revenues Change in net position 2018 2017 Program Expenses Revenues Net Change Net Change $ 1,614,613 $ 214,651 $ (1,399,962) $ (1,225,784) 2,377,661 995,275 (1,382,386) (1,150,500) 5,548,199 2,436,532 (3,111,667) (3,035,831) 615,586 189,315 (426,271) (479,673) 18,333 — (18,333) (3,191) 3,460,887 1,643,333 (1,817,554) (2,028,105) 1,206,067 2,832 (1,203,235) (474,534) 617,344 — (617,344) (514,558) 1,235,055 1,757,834 522,779 374,033 2,932,413 3,181,388 248,975 348,524 848,221 1,544,234 696,013 650,229 2,276,015 1,736,243 (539,772) (495,153) 421,662 694,263 272,601 204,119 $ 23,172,056 $ 14,395,900 (8,776,156) (7,830,424) 10,610,444 10,208, 513 526,367 530,233 780,868 437,973 11,917,679 11,176,719 $ 3,141,523 $ 3,346,295 Not reflected in the table above is a change in accounting principle totaling $75,256, increasing the beginning net position of this statement. One of the goals of this statement is to provide a side-by-side comparison to illustrate the difference in the way the City's governmental and business -type operations are financed. The table clearly illustrates the dependence of the City's governmental operations on general revenues, such as property taxes and unrestricted grants. It also shows that the City's business -type activities are, for the most part, generating sufficient program revenues (service charges and program -specific grants) to cover expenses. This is critical given the current downward pressures on the general revenue sources. KIM LEGISLATIVE UPDATES The 2018 legislative session, falling in the second half of the state's fiscal biennium, was a short session in which only two major finance -related bills were passed, omnibus bonding bills related to bonding, and pensions. The following is a brief summary of specific legislative changes from the 2018 session or previous legislative sessions potentially impacting Minnesota cities. Omnibus Bonding Bill — The omnibus bonding bill authorized financing for over $1.5 billion in capital improvements. Included in the approved funding was $542 million for various transportation infrastructure, $99 million for local city -related economic development projects, and appropriations for a number of different utility (water, sewer, wastewater, etc.) infrastructure improvement programs. Wastewater Investment Protection — Effective retroactively back to August 1, 2017, when a city builds a new wastewater treatment facility or upgrades one to meet current standards that exceed its previous performance, the investment in that facility would be considered adequate for a period of 16 years before a city could be required to upgrade the facility again to meet updated state wastewater facility standards. Competitive Bidding Threshold — Effective for contracts awarded on or after August 1, 2018, the dollar threshold at which Minnesota Statutes require the use of a sealed bidding process was raised from $100,000 to $175,000. This extends the dollar range for which contracts may be awarded using direct negotiation (obtaining two quotations) to contracts between $25,000 and $175,000. By reference, this change also increased the dollar threshold at which public contractors' performance and payment bonds are required for contracts over $175,000. Water Tank Maintenance Contracts — Effective for contracts awarded on or after September 1, 2018, multi-year service contracts for water tank maintenance work that were previously allowed to be awarded through direct negotiation, are required to be awarded through a sealed bid or best value bid procurement process when the total cost of the contract for the services and supplies is expected to exceed the competitive bid threshold of $175,000. Minnesota Licensing and Registration System (MNLARS) — The Legislature established the MNLARS steering committee, and a one-time appropriation of $9.65 million was approved for fiscal year 2018 to fund costs related to the continued development, improvement, operation, and deployment of the MNLARS. However, a bill to provide an additional proposed appropriation of $9 million to partially compensate deputy registrars throughout the state for financial losses related to the flawed rollout of the MNLARS was vetoed by the Governor. Pension Benefit Reforms — The 2018 pension bill included a number of reforms to the various defined benefit pension plans across the state, including the plans administered by the Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA). • Reforms impacting the PERA General Employees Retirement Fund (GERF) plan included: o Post-retirement cost of living adjustments (COLAs) will be equal to 50.0 percent of the annual increase for Social Security, but not less than 0.5 percent, and not more than 1.5 percent. o For early retirees that retire on or after January 1, 2024, COLAs are deferred until the retiree reaches the normal retirement age. o Phases in actuarial reduction factors over five year on early retirement benefits payable beginning July 1, 2019. o The rate of interest paid on refunds of employee contributions to former public employees was reduced from an annual rate of 4.0 percent to 3.0 percent. -21- • Reforms impacting the PERA Public Employees Police and Fire Fund (PEPFF) plan included: o Post-retirement COLAs were permanently set at 1.00 percent. o Employer contribution rates increase from the current 16.20 percent of covered salaries to 16.95 percent beginning January 1, 2019, and 17.70 percent beginning January 1, 2020. o Employee contribution rates increase from the current 10.80 percent of covered salaries to 11.30 percent beginning January 1, 2019, and 11.80 percent beginning January 1, 2020. o To reduce the need for additional contribution increases, the state will contribute an additional $4.5 million to the plan annually for fiscal years 2019 and 2020, increasing to $9.0 million annually thereafter through fiscal 2048, or until the plan is fully funded. o The rate of interest paid on refunds of employee contributions to former public employees was reduced from an annual rate of 4.00 percent to 3.00 percent. • Reforms impacting the volunteer firefighter relief associations plan included: o Added a requirement that the fire chief annually certify each firefighter's service credit to the relief association and the related municipality effective January 1, 2019. -22- ACCOUNTING AND AUDITING UPDATES GASB STATEMENT NO. 83, CERTAINASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS This statement addresses accounting and financial reporting for certain asset retirement obligations (ARO), which are legally enforceable liabilities associated with the retirement of a tangible capital asset. This statement establishes criteria for determining the timing and pattern of recognition of a liability and a corresponding deferred outflow of resources for ARO. A government that has legal obligations to perform future asset retirement activities related to its tangible capital assets should recognize a liability when it is both incurred and reasonably estimable. The measurement of an ARO is required to be based on the best estimate of the current value of outlays expected to be incurred, and a deferred outflow of resources associated with an ARO is required to be measured at the amount of the corresponding liability upon initial measurement. This statement requires the current value of a government's AROs to be adjusted for the effects of general inflation or deflation at least annually, and a government to evaluate all relevant factors at least annually to determine whether the effects of one or more of the factors are expected to significantly change the estimated asset retirement outlays. A government should remeasure an ARO only when the result of the evaluation indicates there is a significant change in the estimated outlays. Deferred outflows of resources should be reduced and recognized as outflows of resources in a systematic and rational manner over the estimated useful life of the tangible capital asset. If a government owns a minority interest in a jointly owned tangible asset where a nongovernmental entity is the majority owner or has operational responsibility for the jointly owned asset, the government's minority share of an ARO should be reported using the measurement produced by the nongovernmental majority owner or the nongovernmental minority owner that has operational responsibility, without adjustment to conform to the liability measurement and recognition requirements of this statement. The statement also requires disclosures of any funding or financial assurance requirements a government has related to the performance of asset retirement activities, along with any assets restricted for the payment of the government's AROs. This statement also requires disclosure of information about the nature of a government's AROs, the methods and assumptions used for the estimates of the liabilities, and the estimated remaining useful life of the associated tangible capital assets. If an ARO (or portions thereof) has been incurred by a government but is not yet recognized because it is not reasonably estimable, the government is required to disclose that fact and the reasons therefor. This statement requires similar disclosures for a government's minority shares of AROs. The requirements of this statement are effective for reporting periods beginning after June 15, 2018. Earlier application is encouraged. GASB STATEMENT NO. 84, FIDuaARYACTIVITIES This statement establishes criteria for identifying fiduciary activities of all state and local governments. The focus of the criteria generally is on (1) whether a government is controlling the assets of the fiduciary activity, and (2) the beneficiaries with whom a fiduciary relationship exists. Separate criteria are included to identify fiduciary component units and post -employment benefit arrangements that are fiduciary activities. -23- An activity meeting the criteria should be reported in a fiduciary fund in the basic financial statements, which should present a statement of fiduciary net position and a statement of changes in fiduciary net position. This statement describes four fiduciary funds that should be reported, if applicable: (1) pension (and other employee benefit) trust funds, (2) investment trust funds, (3) private -purpose trust funds, and (4) custodial funds. Custodial funds generally should report fiduciary activities that are not held in a trust or equivalent arrangement that meets specific criteria. A fiduciary component unit, when reported in the fiduciary fund financial statements of a primary government, should combine its information with its component units that are fiduciary component units and aggregate that combined information with the primary government's fiduciary funds. This statement also provides for recognition of a liability to the beneficiaries in a fiduciary fund when an event has occurred that compels the government to disburse fiduciary resources, defined as when a demand for the resources has been made or when no further action, approval, or condition is required to be taken or met by the beneficiary to release the assets. The requirements of this statement are effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018. Earlier application is encouraged. GASB STATEMENT NO. 87, LEASES A lease is a contract that transfers control of the right to use another entity's nonfinancial asset as specified in the contract for a period of time in an exchange or exchange -like transaction. Examples of nonfinancial assets include buildings, land, vehicles, and equipment. Any contract that meets this definition should be accounted for under the leases guidance, unless specifically excluded in this statement. Governments enter into leases for many types of assets. Under the previous guidance, leases were classified as either capital or operating depending on whether the lease met any of the four tests. In many cases, the previous guidance resulted in reporting lease transactions differently than similar nonlease financing transactions. The goal of this statement is to better meet the information needs of users by improving accounting and financial reporting for leases by governments. It establishes a single model for lease accounting based on the principle that leases are financings of the right -to -use an underlying asset. This statement increases the usefulness of financial statements by requiring recognition of certain lease assets and liabilities for leases that previously were classified as operating leases and recognized as inflows of resources or outflows of resources based on the payment provisions of the contract. Under this statement, a lessee is required to recognize a lease liability and an intangible right -to -use lease asset, and a lessor is required to recognize a lease receivable and a deferred inflow of resources, thereby enhancing the relevance and consistency of information about governments' leasing activities. To reduce the cost of implementation, this statement includes an exception for short-term leases, defined as a lease that, at the commencement of the lease term, has a maximum possible term under the lease contract of 12 months (or less), including any options to extend, regardless of their probability of being exercised. Lessees and lessors should recognize short-term lease payments as outflows of resources or inflows of resources, respectively, based on the payment provisions of the lease contract. The requirements of this statement are effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019. -24- GASB STATEMENT NO. 88, CERTAIN DISCLOSURES RELATED TO DEBT, INCLUDING DIRECT BORROWINGS AND DIRECT PLACEMENTS The primary objective of this statement is to improve the information that is disclosed in notes to government financial statements related to debt, including direct borrowings and direct placements. It also clarifies which liabilities governments should include when disclosing information related to debt. The requirements of this statement will improve financial reporting by providing users of financial statements with essential information that currently is not consistently provided. In addition, information about resources to liquidate debt and the risks associated with changes in terms associated with debt will be disclosed. As a result, users will have better information to understand the effects of debt on a government's future resource flows. This statement defines debt for purposes of disclosure in notes to financial statements as a liability that arises from a contractual obligation to pay cash (or other assets that may be used in lieu of cash) in one or more payments to settle an amount that is fixed at the date the contractual obligation is established. The statement requires that additional essential information related to debt be disclosed in notes to financial statements, including unused lines of credit; assets pledged as collateral for the debt; and terms specified in debt agreements related to significant events of default with finance -related consequences, significant termination events with finance -related consequences, and significant subjective acceleration clauses. It also requires that existing and additional information be provided for direct borrowings and direct placements of debt separately from other debt. The requirements of this statement are effective for reporting periods beginning after June 15, 2018. GASB STATEMENT NO. 89, ACCOUNTING FOR INTEREST COST INCURRED BEFORE THE END OF A CONSTRUCTIONPERIOD The objectives of this statement are to enhance the relevance and comparability of information about capital assets and the cost of borrowing for a reporting period and to simplify accounting for interest cost incurred before the end of a construction period. This statement requires that interest cost incurred before the end of a construction period be recognized as an expense in the period in which the cost is incurred for financial statements prepared using the economic resources measurement focus. As a result, interest cost incurred before the end of a construction period will no longer be included in the historical cost of a capital asset reported in a business -type activity or enterprise fund. This statement also reiterates that in financial statements prepared using the current financial resources measurement focus, interest cost incurred before the end of a construction period should continue to be recognized as an expenditure on a basis consistent with governmental fund accounting principles. The requirements of this statement are effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019. Earlier application is encouraged. The requirements of this statement should be applied prospectively. -25- GASB STATEMENT NO. 90, MAJORITY EQUITY INTEREST -AN AMENDMENT OF GASB STATEMENTS No. 14 AND No. 61 The primary objectives of this statement are to improve the consistency and comparability of reporting a government's majority equity interest in a legally separate organization and to improve the relevance of financial statement information for certain component units. It specifies that a majority equity interest in a legally separate organization should be reported as an investment if a government's holding of the equity interest meets the definition of an investment. It further specifies that such investments should generally be measured using the equity method, unless it is held by a special-purpose government engaged only in fiduciary activities, a fiduciary fund, or an endowment (including permanent and term endowments) or permanent fund, in which case the majority equity interest should be measured at fair value. All other holdings of a majority equity interest in a legally separate organization that do not meet the defmition of an investment result in the government being financially accountable for the legally separate organization and, therefore, the government should report that organization as a component unit, and should report an asset related to the majority equity interest using the equity method. This statement also requires that a component unit in which a government has a 100 percent equity interest account for its assets, deferred outflows of resources, liabilities, and deferred inflows of resources at acquisition value at the date the government acquired a 100 percent equity interest in the component unit. Transactions presented in flows statements of the component unit in that circumstance should include only transactions that occurred subsequent to the acquisition. The requirements of this statement are effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018. Earlier application is encouraged. The requirements should be applied retroactively, except for the provisions related to reporting a majority equity interest in a component unit and reporting a component unit if the government acquires a 100 percent equity interest, which should be applied prospectively. UNIFORM GUIDANCE, MICRO -PURCHASE THRESHOLD Under the Uniform Guidance for federal programs, a micro -purchase is one for goods or services that, due to its relatively low value, does not require the government to abide by many of its ordinary competitive procedures, including small business set -asides. Because the contract is theoretically such a low amount, the contracting officer can pick virtually whatever company and product he or she wants to satisfy the procurement, so long as the price is reasonable. The standard micro -purchase threshold has been amended to increase the threshold to $10,000, effective June 20, 2018. Entities are not required to increase the micro -purchase and simplified acquisition thresholds but, if they wish to do so, they must update their procurement policies and procedures to reflect the change in thresholds. They cannot retroactively make these changes effective prior to June 20, 2018. Wei City Council Agenda — 05/28/2019 4B. Consideration of a Request for Amendment to PUD and Development Stage PUD, and Preliminary Plat for the Development of Spirit Hills South, a 48 unit Single Familv Residential in an R -A (Residential Amenities) District Applicant: R.W. Land Holdings, LLC (NAC) Property: Planning Case Number: Legal: Outlot B, Spirit Hills PID: 155-199-001090 2019-011 A. REFERENCE & BACKGROUND Request(s): Amendment to a PUD, Rezoning from R -A, Residential Amenities to PUD, Planned Unit Development and a Preliminary Plat for a 48 -lot single family residential subdivision (Spirit Hills South) The Rezoning to PUD will be considered with the Final Plat and Final Stage PUD. Deadline for Decision: June 7th, 2019, extended to August 6, 2019 Land Use Designation: Places to Live Zoning Designation: R -A, Residential Amenities District. The purpose of the "R -A" residence district is to provide move up housing in the form of low density, single family, detached residential dwelling units and directly related complementary uses in areas of high natural residential amenities including such conditions as woodlands, wetlands, and significant views. Overlays/Environmental Regulations Applicable: NA Current Site Use: Vacant Surrounding Land Uses: North: Public Land/Communications Towers East: Single Family Residential South: Single Family Residential West: Vacant/Agricultural City Council Agenda — 05/28/2019 Project Description: The applicants propose to plat and develop a single- family subdivision on a 25 -acre property which is part of the Spirit Hills Planned Unit Development first approved by the City in 2003. The property was joined by PUD agreement to the Spirit Hills North Townhouse project located to the north along Fenning Avenue NE and County 18. The applicants propose to plat the property in a similar configuration to that originally proposed, although the proposed lot count has decreased from 50 to 48, and small changes have been made to portions of the street design. Procedurally, the City will amend the original Conditional Use Permit PUD by rezoning the project to a PUD District and processing the Development Stage PUD. As a part of the PUD, the applicants wish to depart from the R -A standards via shallower front setbacks (30 feet rather than average of 35 feet). This change (amendment) had originally been approved by the City Council as part of the 2003 PUD. ANALYSIS: Subdivision and Zoning Requirements Land Use. The required land use is low density residential in this area due to the PUD approved at the time of the original Preliminary Plat (2003). At that time, the City approved a 50 -lot single family subdivision upon the subject property (Spirit Hills South site). Such approval was made in connection with the townhouse development on Spirit Hills North, with the expectation that the overall average density on the two tracts would be no more than 3.5 units per acre. Streets. The proposed street configuration is generally similar to that illustrated on the preliminary plat approved in 2003. Fenning Avenue, which borders the site from the west, is presently under the jurisdiction of the City. Such street will, however, soon be under the jurisdiction of Wright County, which plans to improve and widen it. Access to the subdivision is to be provided from the west via Fenning Avenue and from the east via Wildwood Boulevard. The location of the Fenning Avenue access was previously approved by the City and deemed acceptable. To be noted that the preliminary plat includes 15 feet of additional right-of-way along Fanning Avenue. Such dedication responds to a request by Wright County. While the proposed street configuration circulates well and is responsive to site topography, the following street -related conditions are recommended as conditions of preliminary plat approval: K City Council Agenda — 05/28/2019 1. Bison Avenue, where it intersects with Wildwood Avenue in the east area of the site be shifted approximately 30 feet to the south such that traffic on such road will not directly face the home located upon Lot 6, Block 4. This would also have the effect of flattening the curve of Bison Avenue. 2. To accommodate a right turn lane into the subject site at Wildwood Boulevard (from Fenning Avenue), the applicant be responsible for the grading of that portion of Fenning Avenue within which the right turn lane is to be located. Such grading efforts should be subject to County and City Engineer review and approval. This condition has been revised based on the recommendation of the Wright County Highway Engineer. Wright County recommends the construction of a by-pass lane or left turn lane. See also the discussion noted as part of the Planning Commission consideration below. 3. The applicants grade and construct the proposed trail along the east side of Fenning Avenue (within the street right-of-way). This issue should be subject to further comment by the City Engineer and Wright County. 4. Recognizing that future access to the communication tower site is to be provided from the east via a westward extension of Wildwood Boulevard, existing ingress and egress easements to the site be terminated (released) or modified in the area of the public right of way and proposed lots. Block Layout. The block layout illustrated on the preliminary plat mimics the block layout on the 2003. It is Staff's opinion that the block layout and related street configuration respond well to various site features (topography, the gas easement, access limitations and the communication tower site). Entrance Monument. The applicants propose an entrance monument to the project to be located on Lot 1, Block 6 near Fenning Avenue. The applicants should supply a detail of this sign in compliance with the City's sign requirements, and a narrative describing how the monument will be maintained. As it is not located in the right of way, the City will not be responsible for its ongoing maintenance, but it will need to avoid conflicts with traffic sightlines. If located within the drainage and utility easement, an encroachment agreement will also be required. Lots Sizes. Within R -A zoning districts, the average lot size must not be less than 16,000 square feet and in no case may lots be less than 14,000 square feet in size. Further, at least 40% of all lots must be greater than 15,000 square feet in area. Thirty of the 48 lots exceed 15,000 square feet (62.5%), and the average lot size is in excess of 17,600 square feet. All lots have been found to comply with the applicable R -A District lot area requirements. For lot width, the requirement is an average of 100 feet of width, with no narrower than 90 feet, and at least 40% of all lots exceeding 100 feet of width. Again, the plat complies, with 48% of the lots exceeding 100 feet in width, and easily exceeding the average requirement. Other standards are required in the R -A District as shown in the following table: 3 City Council Agenda — 05/28/2019 REQUIRED YARDS [in feet) Max Minimum I Minimum Roof Height Minimum Floor Areas Building Pitch & Soffit ` Interior Street Front I gide [I] Side Rear � {storiesf (sq ft) Width {vertical rise) feet) (ft) horizontal run) Single Minimum foundation sizes 6 home type 6 12 Family 35 10 20 30 2.3 stories y24 y [2] 35 feet [3] no minimum Building soffit 2000 finishable [4] [1]: For interior lots in R-1 and R -A districts, attacher accessory structures may he allowed to meet a 6' setback, provided that the sum of both side yard setbacks shall be a minimum of 20 feet. [2]: The required rear yard shall consist of a space at least 30 -feet in depth across the entire width of the lot that is exclusive of wetlands, ponds, or slopes greater than 12 percent. [3]: 2400 square foot gross floor area excluding a basement or cellar for two story homes and a 1600 square foot foundation for multi-level, rambler and split entry homes. [4]: Finishable square footage is exclusive of attached accessory space. An attached garage shall be included with all principal residential structures in the R -A district. See Section 5.3fB) for all general standards and limitations on accessory structures. Accessory The minimum floor area for all attached accessory structures shall be 700 sq. ft. Structures No portion of any garage space may be more than five feet closer to the street than the front building line of the principal use (including porch). See footnote [1] above as related to setbacks for attached accessory structures on interior lots. Other Section 3.3, Common District Requirements Regulations Section 3,4f13). Standards ADDlicable to All Residential Base Zoning Districts to Consult Section 4.1 1, Building Materials (not all Section 4.8. Off -Street Parkin, inclusive) Section 4.1. Landscaping and Screening Standards Side Lot Lines. While the subdivision is considered well -conceived, some concerns exist related to the configuration of side lot lines which border the 95 -foot wide gas easement which traverses the subject site. As shown on the preliminary plat, side lot lines which encroach upon the easement are drawn parallel to the easement. This results in numerous site lot lines which are not perpendicular to the streets from corresponding lots which are provided access. According to Section 11-5-2.0 of the City's Subdivision Ordinance, side lines of lots must be approximately at right angles to street lines or radial to curved street lines. To address this concern, it is recommended that side lot lines of lots which border the gas easement be pivoted such that they are at right angles to adjacent to streets and retain conforming lot sizes and suitable building pads. These lots include the following: • Lots 4 and 5, Block 2 • Lots 6 and 7, Block 3 • Lots 11 and 12, Block 3 • Lots 5 and 6, Block 5 El City Council Agenda — 05/28/2019 An example of this recommendation is illustrated below: It is further recommended that the side lot line between Lots 2 and 3, Block 2 be shifted such that it meets the southwest corner of the communications tower site. Such change is intended to eliminate the oddly configured rear line of Lot 3, Block 2, illustrated as so; l � inn r a�r .oi '� i i I —' •— k I� y 4 ti I - 116 qk � II 1 �k .�'4!r' V f{ I 5 Iaa �r. ti � 7 I 12 � r•.r•, ;,M >-a . ��' �I ' alk � . a � •� � _ _ - ` t __' . _ .� r ... { =mow. i„ � + r •� — — —_ — _ —� �, it � 1 � � _ _ + •�_ k � ISW . It is further recommended that the side lot line between Lots 2 and 3, Block 2 be shifted such that it meets the southwest corner of the communications tower site. Such change is intended to eliminate the oddly configured rear line of Lot 3, Block 2, illustrated as so; Setbacks. Within R -A Districts, the following principal building setbacks apply: Front yard: 35 feet Side yard (interior): 10 feet Side yard (along streets): 20 feet Rear yard: 30 feet As indicated, the applicants wish to depart from the R -A standards via shallower front setbacks (30 feet rather than average of 35 feet). This change (amendment) had been 5 F C.41 y[n7 i&& 00 f' - 116 qk � II 1 �k .�'4!r' V f{ I 5 Setbacks. Within R -A Districts, the following principal building setbacks apply: Front yard: 35 feet Side yard (interior): 10 feet Side yard (along streets): 20 feet Rear yard: 30 feet As indicated, the applicants wish to depart from the R -A standards via shallower front setbacks (30 feet rather than average of 35 feet). This change (amendment) had been 5 City Council Agenda — 05/28/2019 approved by the City Council as part of the original PUD. Building setbacks are illustrated on the submitted preliminary plat. All lots illustrate an ability to meet required setbacks. House Design. A variety of home types are proposed within the subdivision. Specifically, homes with full basements, full basement walkouts and full basement lookouts are proposed. No request to alter the standards of the R -A District have been requested and therefore home development within the PUD will be required to meet all standards per ordinance for home design. Home types assigned to individual lots as well as building pads are illustrated on the submitted grading, drainage and erosion control plan. Tree Preservation. Appropriately, a tree preservation plan has been submitted for review. According to the Zoning Ordinance, all "specimen trees" must be protected in accordance with certain standards. A "specimen tree" is defined as a tree greater than 36 inches in DBH (diameter breast height). The removal of "specimen trees" is allowed but must meet certain replacement standards. In review of the tree preservation plan, existing trees are located primarily along the north, south and east boundaries of the subject site. It appears that a total of 11 trees are to be saved upon the subject site. There are no specimen trees on the property, however, a few of the larger oak trees along the northern boundary are being preserved per plan. The applicant should make every effort to protect trees when possible, subject to the review of the City Engineer and City Forester. Landscaping. The project has included a landscaping plan that includes two trees to be planted per lot. The zoning ordinance requires that these trees be planted in the boulevard of each parcel, between the front lot line and the street, or between the sidewalk and the street where sidewalks are included. The landscaping plan shall be revised to meet this requirement. Grading, Drainage and Utilities. Issues related to grading, drainage and utilities are subject to comment and recommendation by the City Engineer. Due to steep topography, several areas of steeper grading are proposed. The City's common requirement is to ensure that no grades steeper than 4:1 are proposed. In this project, 3:1 slopes are not uncommon due to the existing topography. The applicant should work with the City Engineer to ensure that all slopes are maintainable, and manage stormwater to avoid flooding or other negative impacts between properties. In regard to drainage, specific comment should be provided related to the intent and duration of the temporary drainage and utility easement illustrated upon Lot 1, Block 4 and Lot 9, Block 5. Trails. Trail connections to abutting properties to the north and south are proposed within Outlots A and B. While the trail linkage proposed within Outlot B in the extreme southeast corner of the site is considered satisfactory, some concern exists regarding the location of Outlot A. As shown on the preliminary plat, Outlot A is C City Council Agenda — 05/28/2019 located near the center of the site's northern boundary, between Lot 8, Block 1 and Lot 1, Block 2. To provide an opportunity for a direct pedestrian connection to the Fenning Avenue trail and to the City's Montiview Park property adjacent to the north in this area, it is recommended that Outlot A be shifted westward to lie between Lots 5 and 6, Block 1. This would entail shifting lot lines along the northern tier of lots to accommodate this change. Sidewalks. Appropriately, sidewalks are proposed on one side of all streets. Communication Tower Site Encroachment. As shown on the preliminary plat, a communications tower site exists along a portion of the subject site's northern boundary. As previously mentioned, access to the site from the east is intended to remain but will be provided via a public street rather than by ingress/egress easement. To be noted is that a portion of the tower sites gravel parking area encroaches upon adjacent Lot 2, Block 2. As a condition of preliminary plat approval, the tower site's parking area should be reconfigured to remove such parking area encroachment. Park Dedication. Park dedication requirements for the subdivision are proposed such that the dedication of trail outlots (Outlots A and B) and the construction of trails within such outlots will substantially fulfill the City's park dedication requirements, with some cash adjustments due to finalized construction cost estimates, including final recommendations related to Fenning Avenue trail improvements. The Park & Recreation Commission will review the plat on May 24th, 2019 for a final recommendation to the City Council. PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission reviewed the requests and held a public hearing on the, rezoning to PUD, amendment to PUD and development stage PUD, and preliminary plat on May 7th, 2019. During the public hearing, those addressing the Commission expressed concern regarding three primary issues. First, the residents of the Hillside Farm development expressed concern over the loss of the existing tree line on the southern edge of the VA F } I Arrea to 6e 77 sto I \ rl I .-L--km- �'4 o.I# Park Dedication. Park dedication requirements for the subdivision are proposed such that the dedication of trail outlots (Outlots A and B) and the construction of trails within such outlots will substantially fulfill the City's park dedication requirements, with some cash adjustments due to finalized construction cost estimates, including final recommendations related to Fenning Avenue trail improvements. The Park & Recreation Commission will review the plat on May 24th, 2019 for a final recommendation to the City Council. PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission reviewed the requests and held a public hearing on the, rezoning to PUD, amendment to PUD and development stage PUD, and preliminary plat on May 7th, 2019. During the public hearing, those addressing the Commission expressed concern regarding three primary issues. First, the residents of the Hillside Farm development expressed concern over the loss of the existing tree line on the southern edge of the VA City Council Agenda — 05/28/2019 proposed plat. The developer's engineer noted that the topography of the area required the tree removal to support stormwater management and grading and drainage for the site. It was noted by staff that as a condition of approval, the developer is to work with the City Forester (currently the Parks Superintendent) to minimize loss to the extent possible. The City Forester has noted that many of the trees are of a species and size not sufficient to support preservation. The second issue raised by both residents of Hillside Farm and township residents adjacent to the proposed development related to the proposed street access from Fenning Avenue into the development. Those addressing the Commission noted that both the speed and visibility for vehicles turning into the site from Fenning Avenue presents safety concerns. It was explained by staff that Fenning Avenue would become a County Road in 2019, with improvements to the road by Wright County planned for 2021. As such, staff consulted with the Wright County Highway Engineer's office on the proposed plat. Preliminarily, a right turn was recommended based on the number of housing units and the existing design factors for Fenning Avenue. That requirement was subsequently listed as a condition of approval for the plat. Residents at Hillside Farm also inquired as to the design and timing of a trail connection along Fenning Avenue, stating that walking or biking along Fenning is a serious safety concern. City staff explained that the developer of the proposed Spirit Hills project will be required to install the pathway along Fenning for the length of their development in satisfaction of the park dedication requirements. In addition, the City's Pathway Connection Guide map supports a connection through the Montiview Park along Fenning with the 2021 County improvement project. The planned improvements would also complete the section from Montiview Park to the Spirit Hills North townhome development, where the developer of that project completed the sub -grade for the trail. Brian Schultz, property owner adjacent to the plat to the north, also inquired about the configuration of the plat on the northeast corner in terms of the telecommunication tower access. It was noted that the proposed public street connection would provide access to the tower site and that a condition relating to the existing access easements is a condition of plat approval. In the Commission's discussion, the Commissioners and City Council representative Davidson noted their concern related to the speed and potential safety concern related to the access into the development. Following the conclusion of the public hearing and discussion, the Planning Commission recommended in a 2-1 vote the approval of the rezoning to PUD, amendment to PUD and development stage PUD and preliminary plat for Spirit Hills South. Commissioner Fyle voted in dissent, citing concern with the access from Fenning Avenue. ADDITIONAL ANALYSIS Since the time of the Planning Commission meeting, the City has received a formal review letter regarding the plat from the Wright County Highway Engineer's Office. City Council Agenda — 05/28/2019 The letter indicates that in lieu of a right turn lane, a by-pass lane (for south bound traffic on Fenning Avenue) is recommended to support the proposed development access. Alternatively, the developer can construct a left turn lane for the access. As such, staff has modified condition #2 for the requests to require that the developer work to address the safety concerns for the access in compliance with the Wright County Highway Engineer's letter. City staff will continue to work with the developer to address this item to the satisfaction of Wright County and in terms of the safety concerns raised during the public hearing. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS The Planning Commission recommended Alternative 1 in a 2-1 vote. 1. Motion to approve the PUD amendment and Development Stage PUD and Preliminary Plat for Spirit Hills South, based on the findings in Resolution No. PC -2019-012, subject to the revised conditions as incorporated in Exhibit Z. 2. Motion to deny Motion to table action on the requests, subject to additional information from the applicant and/or Staff. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The applicant's intent is to implement the southern phase of the Spirit Hills PUD which was approved by the City in 2003. The submitted preliminary plat is substantially similar to the preliminary plat in terms of design to that previously approved (48 single family lots verses 50 lots previously approved). With this in mind, Staff recommends approval of the PUD and preliminary plat subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit Z and based on the findings in the accompanying resolution. As noted, staff will continue to work with the developer on the access configuration from Fenning Avenue. D. SUPPORTING DATA A. Resolution PC -2019-012 B. Draft Ordinance No. 723 C. Aerial Site Image D. Applicant Narrative E. Approved Preliminary Plat (2003) F. Preliminary Plat G. Existing Conditions and Removals Plan H. Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plan I. Sanitary Sewer and Watermain Plans J. Street and Storm Sewer Plans K. Sanitary Sewer Plan L. Trail Plans M. Tree Preservation Plan N. Landscaping Plan and Revised Lot Tabulation O. Tree Inventory P. City Engineer's Letter, Dated May 1, 2019 G� City Council Agenda — 05/28/2019 Q. Wright County Highway Engineer's Letter, Dated May 16th, 2019 Z. Conditions of Approval 10 City Council Agenda — 05/28/2019 EXHIBIT Z Spirit Hills PUD Amendment, Development Stage PUD & Spirit Hills South Preliminary Plat Outlot B, Spirit Hills 1. Bison Avenue, where it intersects with Wildwood Avenue in the east area of the site shall be shifted approximately 30 feet to the south such that traffic on such road will not directly face the home located upon Lot 6, Block 4. 2. The developer will address the comments related to the proposed access to Wildwood Boulevard from Fenning Avenue per the Wright County Highway Engineer's letter dated May 16th, 2019. 3. The applicants grade the proposed trail route along the east side of Fenning Avenue (within the street right-of-way). This issue shall be subject to further comment by the City Engineer and Wright County. 4. Recognizing that future access to the communication tower site is to be provided from the east (via a westward extension of Wildwood Boulevard), existing ingress and egress easements to the site shall be terminated (released). 5. Side lot lines of lots which border the gas easement shall be pivoted such that they are at right angles to adjacent to streets and retain conforming lot sizes and suitable building pads. These lots include the following: • Lots 4 and 5, Block 2 • Lots 6 and 7, Block 3 • Lots 11 and 12, Block 3 • Lots 5 and 6, Block 5 6. To eliminate the oddly configured rear line of Lot 3, Block 2, the side lot line between Lots 2 and 3, Block 2 shall be shifted such that it meets the southwest corner of the corner of the communications tower site. 7. The submitted tree preservation plan shall be subject to review and comment by the City Forester. 8. Modification of the landscaping plan to show all required trees (2 per lot) to be located in the boulevard, per this report. 9. Compliance with comments related to grading, drainage and utilities shall be by the City Engineer. City Council Agenda — 05/28/2019 10. To provide an opportunity for a direct pedestrian connection to the Fenning Avenue trail, Outlot A shall be shifted westward to lie between Lots 5 and 6, Block 1. 11. The communication tower site's parking area shall be reconfigured to remove the existing encroachment into adjacent Lot 2, Block 2. 12. Execute a Development Agreement providing for the terms and conditions for the plat and Planned Unit Development. 13. Consideration of comments of other City Staff. 12 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2019-012 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) FOR A REZONING TO A PUD DISTRICT AFFECTING THE DEFINITIONS AND USES, THE SUBJECT ZONING DISTRICT, DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, PERMITTED USES, SITE PLAN, AND BUILDING PLANS AND DEVELOPMENT STAGE PUD AND PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR SPIRIT HILLS SOUTH PUD WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted a request to subdivide its property along Fenning Avenue NE, PID No. 155-199-001090 into forty-eight single family parcels and associated outlots, as well as dedication of public street rights of way; and WHEREAS, a previous owner had received original approvals for such subdivision and a PUD request related to density and relationship to an off-site development; and WHEREAS, the applicant is seeking amendments to the PUD setbacks and plat layout; and WHEREAS, the applicant concurrently proposes to develop the property for single family residential uses; and WHEREAS, the site is guided for residential uses under the label "Places to Live" in the City's Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the proposed PUD, along with the companion Plat, are consistent with the long-term use and development of the property for residential uses; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on May 7, 2019 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: The PUD provides an appropriate means of furthering the intent of the Comprehensive Plan for the site by putting the property to low density residential use. 2. The proposed improvements on the site under the PUD are consistent with the needs of the PUD in this location as a residential area. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2019-012 3. The improvements will have expected impacts on public services, including sewer, water, stormwater treatment, and traffic which have been planned to serve the property for the development as proposed. 4.. The PUD flexibility for the project, including altered front setback requirements, are consistent with the intent of the PUD zoning regulations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, that the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the Monticello City Council approves Ordinance No. 6X -X, an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance including the Zoning District Amendment, as well as the Development Stage PUD and Preliminary Plat as reviewed in the Staff Report for May 7, 2019, and subject to the conditions in Exhibit Z of said report, as follows: 1. Bison Avenue, where it intersects with Wildwood Avenue in the east area of the site shall be shifted approximately 30 feet to the south such that traffic on such road will not directly face the home located upon Lot 6, Block 4. 2. To accommodate a right turn lane into the subject site at Wildwood Boulevard, the applicant shall be responsible for the grading of that portion of Fenning Avenue within which the right turn lane is to be located. Such grading efforts shall be subject to County and City Engineer review and approval. 3. The applicants grade the proposed trail route along the east side of Fenning Avenue (within the street right-of-way). This issue shall be subject to further comment by the City Engineer and Wright County. 4. Recognizing that future access to the communication tower site is to be provided from the east (via a westward extension of Wildwood Boulevard), existing ingress and egress easements to the site shall be terminated (released). 5. Side lot lines of lots which border the gas easement shall be pivoted such that they are at right angles to adjacent to streets and retain conforming lot sizes and suitable building pads. These lots include the following: • Lots 4 and 5, Block 2 • Lots 6 and 7, Block 3 • Lots 11 and 12, Block 3 • Lots 5 and 6, Block 5 6. To eliminate the oddly configured rear line of Lot 3, Block 2, the side lot line between Lots 2 and 3, Block 2 shall be shifted such that it meets the southwest corner of the corner of the communications tower site. 2 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2019-012 7. The submitted tree preservation plan shall be subject to review and comment by the City Forester. 8. Modification of the landscaping plan to show all required trees (2 per lot) to be located in the boulevard, per this report. 9. Compliance with comments related to grading, drainage and utilities shall be by the City Engineer. 10. To provide an opportunity for a direct pedestrian connection to the Fenning Avenue trail, Outlot A shall be shifted westward to lie between Lots 5 and 6, Block 1. 11. The communication tower site's parking area shall be reconfigured to remove the existing encroachment into adjacent Lot 2, Block 2. 12. Execute a Development Agreement providing for the terms and conditions for the plat and Planned Unit Development. 13. Consideration of comments of other City Staff. ADOPTED this 70' day of May, 2019, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. ATTEST: MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMIS L Angela Sc Community Development Director f-1- ORDINANCE NO. 723 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 10 OF THE MONTICELLO CITY CODE, KNOWN AS THE ZONING ORDINANCE, BY ADDING THE "SPIRIT HILLS SOUTH PUD", A ZONING DISTRICT IN THE CITY OF MONTICELLO, SECTION 2.4(0): SPIRIT HILLS SOUTH THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO HEREBY ORDAINS: Section 1. Section 2.4(0 — Planned Unit Developments, Title 10 — Zoning Ordinance is hereby amended to read as follows: 22. Spirit Hills South PUD District (a) Permitted Uses. Permitted principal uses in the Spirit Hills South PUD District shall be: i. Those Uses as allowed in the R -A, Residential Amenities Zoning District. (b) Accessory Uses. Accessory uses in the Spirit Hills South PUD District shall be: i. Those Uses as allowed in the R -A, Residential Amenities Zoning District. (c) Conditional Uses. Conditional uses in the Spirit Hills South PUD District shall be: i. Those Uses as allowed in the R -A, Residential Amenities Zoning District. (d) District Performance Standards. The performance standards in the Spirit Hills South PUD District shall be those standards as applicable in the R -A, Residential Amenities District, with the following exceptions: i. Front Yard Setback: 30 feet ii. Standards and Conditions as illustrated on the approved Preliminary Plat for Spirit Hills South, dated , 2019. 1 ORDINANCE NO. 723 Section 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to make the changes required by this Ordinance as part of the Official Monticello City Code, Title 10, Zoning Ordinance, and to renumber the tables and chapters accordingly as necessary to provide the intended effect of this Ordinance. The City Clerk is further directed to make necessary corrections to any internal citations that result from said renumbering process, provided that such changes retain the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance as has been adopted. Section 3. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage and publication. The ordinance in its entirety and map shall be posted on the City website after publication. Copies of the complete Ordinance and map are available online and at Monticello City Hall for examination upon request. ADOPTED BY the Monticello City Council this day of , 2019. ATTEST: Jeff O'Neill, Administrator AYES: NAYS: Brian Stumpf, Mayor 2 RW Land Holdings LLC- Request for Amdt to CUP for PUD for a Rezoning, Dvlmpt PUD, Preliminary Plat Outlot B Spirit Hills I PID #155-152-000020 Created by: City of Monticello RUM RIVER LAND SURVEYORS & ENGINEERS P.O. Box 1044, Princeton, MN 55371 / Phone: 763/389-4476 / Fax: 763/427-0520 SPIRIT HILLS SOUTH SPIRIT HILLS SOUTH is a proposed 48 -lot single-family residential development on the Southeast side of the City of Monticello. The site is approximately 25 acres on the East side of Fenning Ave. NE, lying on the South side of the "old Monte Club" site. Tucked into the side of the highest hill in Wright County, SPIRIT HILLS SOUTH contains steep elevation changes that will surely showcase the higher end house that will be constructed on its oversized lots. SPIRIT HILLS SOUTH is being developed by RW Land Holdings, LLC of Princeton, MN. RW Land Holdings, LLC is owned by Roger Winkelman. Roger, through his company RW Builders Inc. has been building homes and developing property throughout Northern Sherburne County and the surrounding area for more than 40 years. Roger intends to build on a portion of the lots in SPIRIT HILLS SOUTH, as well as provide an opportunity for other local builders to purchase lots and construct their own homes. With his extensive experience in the land development business, Roger is familiar with the fees and expenses that accompany a development of the size and type of SPIRIT HILLS SOUTH. His goal is to provide a wonderful development that the future residents of Monticello will call home for numbers of years. SPIRIT HILLS SOUTH was originally part of the SPIRIT HILLS planned unit development proposed by Maplewood Development & Construction Inc. in 2003. According to City staff, the SPIRIT HILLS SOUTH property became zoned R-lA (Residential Amenities) as a "tradeoff' for the SPIRIT HILLS TOWNHOMES site in the Southeast corner of Fenning Ave. NE and Jason Ave. NE (Co. Hwy. No. 18). With the R-lA standards being generally followed, Maplewood Development proposed a 50 -lot single- family residential development on the SPIRIT HILLS SOUTH site. In 2005, Maplewood Development applied for and received a conditional use permit (Order #05-024) reducing the front setback to 30 feet, as well as amending the building standards and landscaping requirements. Also in 2005, Maplewood Development had a full set of engineering plans prepared, prior to selling the land to RW Land Holdings, LLC in September 2005. RW Land Holdings, LLC intended to develop the property shortly after purchasing it, however the massive recession/housing downturn made that not possible. In preparation of the current proposed SPIRIT HILLS SOUTH development, RW Land Holdings, LLC has tried to match as closely as possible the original lot layout of the previously approved plans. With the removal of the previously proposed "eyebrow" along Bison Avenue in the NW corner of the site, and rearrangement of the lots in the SE corner of the site to match the R -A lot size dimensions, the overall lot count was reduced from 50 lots to 48 lots. The road layout is the same as the previous design, which incorporates connections to HILLSIDE FARMS 4TH ADDITION to the South, WILDWOOD RIDGE to the East, as well as providing an additional access to Fenning Ave. NE, a critical artery for the area. The current proposal also plans to utilitze the reduction in front yard setback to 30 feet granted per CUP Order #05-024 due to the steep elevation changes. The development of SPIRIT HILLS SOUTH is intending to be constructed in one single phase. This single phase would include all site grading and installation of the public/private utilities. SPIRIT HILLS SOUTH --rnY vrc or mnm e. SP•er •Ass - -- NETOti',� 568 2929'E L -Y — S'30'25'E`+Cg�M N28.44SB'E BQ 77.54 ''�'' 2a'�-SW44'48'W 130.42-, _ S �T'q8• mlmu•- OF 15 Fool GAS wt EASO[NT , , WDIN000 R BLVD. R Ir ' WILEW1111 X4�44 9924'46-E ?f E _ PER 8" Te OF MSC. WCOROS PAS m - , 1'_41'E� g 10- Bois n' 48.3 N 2B � f -pd$g L AND PAi11N1Y RELEASED PER adC Na. , o ��etie•c 8 so-� 3s.`�- 72 , in.07 t -s>: oE.An. , 77.,7 �•4�—, r� I *Err ` ' is f�Q4L-� I I Y% 3 (� 1! -_- �--- -------- "' S !ac°38'SY E �� m lees 9 7 I g I .! �gl (; Qsr I / d T '-t— _ _ .. 11- —, �`Y 226E t , ]D`^ S54�� 3 "PS 6-E°43'OB'4 m� R-10aao Ia, rs Q, ml fZ 9 �(� Igo , I A �' Ig �= 6 8 = II say 8 /I •= l -'� I{ trfi��a I I 44►:�. 1 s H / Po A p,� �IP:�� ''.eJ L�• .r '� a, ( 1 22889 4�1 4'22'41 —7, — iae\ 1(0 5 S'II 7 "a 1I 8 r6_ee4e'00-E •a.. ;i¢ � ..� R 5 P R I N d L,p59 r 4^ \ig J"/�yt^A I { W yI� �s,�4��,4�_a- n • d4 c•' / �r — — -� ` ' C \ <' A \�'. a/ 1" '�L I I • ��g y a0 — �sea•sg'13•E -l$i a! �� I� �•0d�'lp.� `. , ! ` 2 / 91 3 40� / / 11 Sl t m y AO 21 I g��� �� ��,,� I I �+��,-�,,, 70 .°e•`- 1.24.72 >o 'I {S 3 iSC+\ \?8.. - L — .--.' 6� 1• 7D � l ' L o-,M'3or= n° _" 4' { {N °rs\ '\� 7n 4 . y �5*' 1 I:� f— g� t3. y1 F s ^ OW Y R �i_ 5*' Lo I A pl { ,,16• -"7'54_ p �S°�p 5 sa9•S9t3•E _t s e3;0e _ bb's\ seaµe� I I ${ o i4o,i red' R H I L L A` ��i I le I W L J 3 t -17.s1 rr \ \ % _LM -3-5 seers a s I o-7ro21s• 4 \/ / / `� r C ( I" L iee.e7 — —_ -- '° ; ��\ 4 / Z7•," " {MA 1 ' \ �L 9.87 ` 18 � r SEB•Ss�,s•Eh-22'54'27%'�' &IS {�4 �y07•E_ t-�-7� „• y� 5 r, �t / : 4 3 ; I 2 r4�- =�r 77 La_ _ War — ^/ \�\\ �' Z / /F '�+ (� :. � , _�l /L� z I— s�e•x saw J • tre-M71 ' ' � °i•�. !-/ / �4�0 \/ ,23gp _ �.NJ ( ,+ � _ -j ,n.� _ ' F --,Wow ' — °, y L > W 1 i te7.9e —& ;4;: a� +3• 3 J ' ` %_7j37 _ — r)�.4i,y J t_ saeseis'Ef r �• %�//% / r"'u'oe52•w »+.G7 7 �— '4i7 i I I I€ ml 3 15 14 f J / ((( / / I I {�' ' sm•ss 3s•E >n Rd E I 1013 35 b _ 8 12 30 A SIL e7 U 180.43 1 I� L tlZ 740• I b / / • bjl I I (4 r �I < I 'J �R Netc5rs.t Rzeo.n -' �-rn_.10 �' ,Sam 90.47 y,=s '.120001 1`4M5 15.2 J ,1 — J L J L00.o - - 140.°0 - �! 3 R R R 4' . — 12621 130.81 i 45.02 .0 )0 �$ro ,R� SBg•9E'33'E`1 30 30 I` 35—,te,.26— — r Lee8.�4� `tom 5 L R`r�.0a-2s�y20. V ` { I Awi 3'06 11 ,, I Y ` M M E R L t N R IN A Y t I u I t r�� � 1Nbt aI 1 os`I�_;31 2 bC• 4a a.;ws ���PI I s/ o;,.• t_ �I I I r dIr LB L Nm*57'34F I3 �oB9 8{ 18 104 gg I 7 g ';b���• � " `V II m 1 ElI I q l gl 1 n� �P J /^ �( ('`� 5 �I 2 IE 30MI��" JJ ( 11 L JL I NO SCALEDETAIL N W E s dt6+>a v M t Droinogs and Utility Easement. ora ehow,M in- -+ I- 6� f �-t2 12-11—_J L_ I — NO SCALE Being 12 feet in width and adjoining nght-of-way Rnm anten otherwise ind'uwted, and being 5 feet 1n width and adjoining lot linea, unleee otheniee indicated as .hewn on the dot. NOTES: 2 O DEMOM A IF • 14' PON RPE MAWM tR LCOME tR61e TUT .ly 9E SET WTHIN ONE YEM PL Or AMMONd THIS AT OR 500NM 1. • DENOTES tl10N MONUMENT FOUND A)� _ J L L ��,a_ ,2119_ _ — — — — — — — — — — lr- S88.5739•,M 1259.48 1- s unE or Du LoT 9. SPOT MLLS 1, F � —L _ SCHOELL A MADSON, INC. ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • PLANNERS SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS 0) 3 7 0 0 r1 / 0) 3 0 r M I n / 00 0 0 N E O 0 .-+ Y M U, -o DATE 33 213.100.241200 Craig A. & Shelley D. Boutain 213.100.241201 Craig A. & Shelley D. Boutain 213.100.243100 Rene & Linda McCullough I i / k \ 33 / / / / / / / � /--\I ITI /--\ -T- /N / UV I L_U I u I '1__1 \-/ / / I � 155.500.241102 1 / / 1 / 155.500.241103 City of Monticello / / 155.116.004010 City of Monticello I Zoning: A-0 1 155.152.000010 / / / Jeffrey A. Mason Zoning: A-0 Brian K. Shultz / / + Zoning: R-1 X60 � i ) I I_ ) I _T_ Zoning: R -A / / Electrical Distribution Easement --!\ - - __ - \ / P -OH I / per Doc. 674478 & \ / / \ 1 �--Utility Easement per Doc. 1189528 � I I I \ I I / / Ingress/Egress & Utility �\�/ / / \� / / //s / ,o,o / Ingress/Egress Lease per, / � \ y Easement per Doc. 674339. Y / �,I 3 q � o �.-Utility Easement per Doc. 1189528 Doc. 1072034_\\\ , i , / I I / / � / U) / 3 00 .°, / / / Ingress/Egress Easement \ � �\ \ \ \ / / / I 11 / \ -_ �/ / _ i p Electrical Distribution Easement -, p \ -\ N�17./0�+1��+E / I i / S$8'29 19 E \ \ / C\4 i , I / / /I -oy \ / per Doc. 667897 _ `i \ \�139.42 11 14" \ O I I � n / / / I \ per Doc. 674478 & \ / S9 - - - \ \ \ \ II- -- - v /X '1� I1I :'� L0, I CO I :t I / / / .( p, Ingress/Egress &Utility `I i \� I \ / 1 �A �� / 0 P -BUR / I I I I I o" I N d' � oy / 1 \I I 00 ✓ .i f c / N 0 II l i / I' I / Easement er Doc. 674339 I / 'L \ ^ '� - - 1 z K. i N V) cV S88'44'46jW /1 -/ o I I \ \� � �7 // // / , p 1 `I / ' _ � -,050 / -- , i 1\ / / / // ov4 �/ i I I 1 #424 r _ I I�\ 139 �2 //,I� 1� .r, / / // ° I � \-, `I � �/ / // ,� , I I I r,l��/\t I _ \ '4b"W I / 2 D� ,Q " i I I 7 - utilit ' / I I 1 I ' - /' ' / s - / , \ \ 1. \ �" /1 ISP8'24 46 W �I) \ / I / / I 8'11 // / 6 I I / 1� \\ _ I , 1 , , aser>'(ent per / o �S / 74' �( / / I I V IL_V VV L/��I-1 S \ S85°31 4�"W 38 / 101 30. „ / / , ` _ - / / ./ / I �I / / - I #42s / �LT�y ,rte v L r, / I I 4- 31- TI / _/ 8 I I +8 I I - ,. I Do A11828 fi N 5'24 58 _ E / 1 / I I 1- -, I ( 15' \\45 -- \ 7>. �\ W , - - --. /- - - \- 279. -,070 - �' / / / / I / I - / i --I- - / O J 49' I - o / - �- _ I 44.13 155.5(0.241104 89.26 /� _ � _ 1i0 - / I T I T n / I c\I - �lJ�-' / I I / I v \� \ \ \ �� , / / /� 31/ \ '� l r I / / U I L \-J I / �l i 1 - - _ - - / / (p ` `� ,� , -/w , i I I / ,h -B-R `. \ �_� / _ - I / O I I O T -BUR . I5 __\\\\\� \ _ s � 4 -1070 l/� o+ \ - - 14T i X11 / / / / / / 1 I - fi I / 0 15 \ \� \ \ ���\ _ \ �� 48_ _ _ _ X "'`o II ,( \ 42 # /i, / ' ' / / ' //- / o-�i� T `�'/------�'J..� $ I I I \ \ \ ���� a �__�_- ___-- _-_� 4 � `` y I . 4v - i I I / / / / / / / / I� - _ -� -� e BM#2� 4sr= = toso = _ - v� / # � \ \ i / / / � - - _J �� #a2s / I \ \ \ \ - - �__,�v - 43�$/ /� �� \ -� i �- T�=�� ¢r=�� f-� 1 r -. i- -_7 X•47' 74' x \ \ I I I I / #\ _brain --e- fie- IJ_Lili yfas&n,!!t- _ - � - -' _ - / Q 1 \ 24 I -I- _ r j I , » / _ i - [/LJ -1 - _ _ - - i 1 I 1 \ \ \ \ ---__ -_--- I I \ _\ \ -,T - --- .� 1 / - 1 S 9'a8 _E _ - -- ���� , �- I / r \ ` / _ \ \ \ - ----- o^ / .- \ \ \ \ % \ - �c I • I 1 \ \ � / ::..:...: ':..:.:....:.,.*, " . e .� - , I - - � 1 i - 228 7 / � �- I \ I I; \ \ k - �- ��-- ��-P ,F� I ,:.. . x x._. t X ..1 _ I / 1 ,/ o o / / \ /' I I' -�� \� \\ \ \ \ \\� \\ �-1060 ���_- - --�I II I I \ \ \ `�/ G / ;.:' .'. - .. .':.:. -- -- 11 J I - I I /\ \\ \ \ \ \\%\---%' _ _--I -' - .o I I \ 11/ \ 1 \ \ \ - //. / o�ti:FQ. .. I I 1 I / / I I 8 > I 1 \' 'I \ \ \ ` / - - - - ;n I � 7 - \ 8 0 \ Q / \ \ \ \ \ �// // / I .. .... :.�: o����::.`"' • 1 / / I I I I 11 \ e I p I / 0 I 1-1 \ \ \ \ \ _ ` -� i - _ -I- ' - - I- \ 1 n o \ 1 \ / :.:: -iq . • .. ;' .; : ; ..:01.:�v;'\ , :.:.., .x I I / I / \ I I � ca o) I °' � 14,00 /S .Ft. I rn I 155.116.003010 I I \ \ \ i 7 _ _ _ - 14y46�J Sq.Ft. I I I I 16,9�6Sq.Ft. I ^ \ \ // I �.....�ca .. • ,. I / / I / it \ I I q I Samuel J. & \ ::I / I I I '% .I 0. Acres 1 I 10N \ \ i I I - - 0.32 Acres 0.39 res 1 \ / / I . o ..,.:.::, .''' p; G•:•:..: / / \ \ I Q S I Nicole L. Burvee I 1 0 \ \ % 24,160 Sq_Ft_ - - I I . I \ 20,1�i Sq.Ft.\ / . / :,n..:.: • q"ta o " ' ` I/ /I I , II \ I \ Zonin R-1 \ \ O\ - - I I • / / 1 0.46 Acres / / - ti: " O :..:,...:.::I' I O 'n I �f/ \ �` \ / \ I I II of \ I I g: 5\ \ �?s�,� \-0.557�cres -- :I I -� I \ / I N':d' . ���..:. / -- --- _� \ 1 1 _ _ _ 1_1I I / I 1 \ \ / / 4r. k0.. ` `, - >..' ., :: ,.:.::j o � I \ \ \21 3 5 Sq.Ft. \ M ` _ W I \ I I \ / / \ - -,05o I I \ I I I / / I \ \ /,� . I c, .; ::.,�.I. I ,n \ / \ \ b. 9 Acres\ / \ 1: \ J \ - I III L' I ` 30,331 Sq.Ft\/ \ \ `\; \ "-��------/�-~T/-- --'- / I \ \ /ry / - / I \ I .;. , 1• :- .-.:.:...._.::: j: I I o / g \ \ \ I \ -I �- - -144" - - x I / 1 \ \ \ 0.70 Acres/\ \ � _ ,�� 90.0 909-' O 7 f \ \ / /�/ I .•.,.:I..::..., I I zl / � \ \\ /\ �\ II I � t', F - . � /' / I� 1 1 \ / \ \ \ /�- --- / -_' L--�- -� 3p \ / h�\' \ /. 1 .. I I I \ �\ 219 -\ �I- - m \ J�\ I; \ I �3�- ` I / I ��__ / \ �_.\ /� L 21 69 70 L_3p, � 90 ,\ �/ / 2 I_ I - 1 ,.� _JI I \ \ 75' \ \\ &: 4. . -- . -7_-\ 30 - \ - - 1 \ i \ 7 IL � ^\ \ r - I _ I \ / $ 1 / / / I \ \ f�/\ _ �/ - - - -I- - - "-T45 -GO-E I M \ _ \ / \ � / � 30 \ I V ro \ I / " / 1 L 155.116.003020 1 / ,6 / / / / I _ _ J Ronald D. Schultz / \ i C v \, / / o / / / / i -� � \ /. 18��S Ft. t, \ ki \ / M I I / / \ \ I` q / N _ _ J0�18t}- /\ c, \ \/ \ \ I \ I 14,000 q.Ft. rn / I Zonin R-1 - / \ �\ \O / / / r�/ / / / / \ �8, \ /\ - 0.44 Acres -4 - _ - - r /,\\ \ °1 1 0'\ I / I g: I , / \ / , a \ \ \ \ M 0.32 Acres-- - - i I / \ I / / _/ / \ / \ \ /� 35' - -115 / \ \ / \ \ I ^�LO X \ / \ / / / 139' / I \ / \ / / L--� \ \ 5 o / / o / / / / \ 7�7 � / \ / \ 19,1991 Sq.Ft. �' / rn i - - /_\ _ \ ; C" / I / / �o`' / /� / / / // \ l / / X02 / x\90 ^`' /-'. I I . . -\. -7 �, I / 10.441Acres ) h I/ / L-� --- ---� ; \r. / / -\_/ / / ,gT / / , 1 I / / \ / r FI / /\ �I I \ - f---155 --� I / \� -, �__ / v/ / ,/ i 74 / / _ 65' / X °° Ir. \ / �I I / I/ I 1. / / /J /� N �. .. - .. \I / C] \ V 69 �� /Q/ 1 \ / / / \ I I \ / � � / �`�/ / / � - / / / 71 r / \ � 4( / \ "// / I I I / \ � � I I/ I \ ; J / / � / Imo- I _ I x / / / - -- i / \ I \ I o %-/ �^� /// /_ /. / /. /II'SL' /� '/� '\ I \ / // 3 --_� -��\ 41 / (2, , \ I /I I �_\ ,o' \ ' / i/ / / I 6j\ 1 \ �\ I I ., [ i- I �� / \ I I I \ __ 1 / �/ /v 1 / / / / / l I l / / �\ / - I I I / \ / 1/ �.'� / / aQ i o / I 0 i \ I \ 1 155.116.003030 t \ // / / / / / / / / I I / I X _ / JI X78 S Ft. I I \ 24 018 S F� \ 1 / / / \ / ° / ' 14 000 S Ft. LO \ 4 / / I / / / o / / / I I / / \ _ _ / /% 0.32 Acres \ 0.55 Acres / I Cn I q' I a' I \ / - q II / o . / o \ o \ Dale A. Breiwick / I / \ \ Y / / / / / 0.32 Acres \ 1D Zoning: R-1 \ (0\ 1 \ f / / / .d, / / I I l / � \ / I I \ / \ 1 / ' ' / 14''I /I I \ I °' «� 1/ / / / / I I \" \ \�o / / 8 40.0 /W / / /.co I ____, \\ r w\ \ \_ i / \ ILLI 16,8\67-Sq.Ftr _ I I I� J / / I 1 / / / I / / I ,(• �, �� \ \ 1 0.39 Acres / \ I � / 1 / / / h / / I/ / I / W \ / __ _ ___ I I I /_---- \ / \ o / / ! 13aq / / o / / / I / \ I 1 T �` \ Z\ � 1 �� ��' ��/ / / /L / / /I t2 / / ' I / yo \ `is w -�--� 127.4 --,950-* ,I ---133 / \ -- ��6� \ \ / / / / / La/�------� -J \P \ \ \ 60 \ I _ - / / 20 41 s' Ft. / / I 3 / /� / � / 1 \ \ ` 1 - • 1 / q I / / \ _ J L----- 1 \ \ \ \ / ____ 156' o \ i II � - �_ - i� / 46 d%res / / I � / � \ / ��� ------ \ T \ / O \ X105 / L �\ _-/ \Q \ ��\------I--� /J / 1 / �__ I J 2131 S .Ft. / � �S S I 72' \68' I L=5 \ \ \ \ \ \ �-� ��-� / 30/ 30 r- ��--- a� �_ / \ 0 1 � ( / / q / ,� / % \ I / / t 10:0 \ \ o,\ _- J/ / �,0 \ \ I I \ � I \ 1 , // / / . y I / // 0.49 Acre] � (9 / / - - - _ - \ \ / \ \ \ , 50�� \ \ \� - \ / 1 / 1 / 1 I / - \ / 40\ \ o \ \ \- \ \ \ I / \\ �\ \ _-- / / \ \ \ 157 ---1 \ \ 30/ / `i/ / / -/I / �( / / -i /^ //.0 / -_ 0 '2 0� / \ \ 1 � I %IN, 1 x _-/ __� /r ' \ �-- I- - C- - - - \ 1 �\ 30/ \/ / / _! JJ / \ / / / \ ! / __ / \ \ \ 139 \ / �� ti� /\ \ � \' \ \ 1 I 1 I o /'o \I I \ o � o / / \ I \ \ I ( �, / / 1 / / /_ _ � _ - / \ / / / / / / �, \ \\ / �� - � / 0 \ P I\ \ . \- \ ) I I 1 I M ^. \ \ �2\ I \ \ I I 1 1 / - -140 _ - /'`\ / / / /�, = - ioso•� \ / 140' \ \ / \ �\ \ \ 1 \ \ 1 .01 I 1 I " 1 / 14.000�q�Et. I - �_ / I I I 1 0.32 Acres ti k -,8-° F1p30 / // ,� �z 'N `� \\ \3 II o I �/ / -" /� _ / -.two - /,-__ \ o - \ \ \ rk /'` I I i I I 1 // \�Ir \� /�� 0�� '' / \ / / ,2 I -- I-- �- I Z 'o I \ . \ / N �- - , - � , -1 k /` � X° / - - __ / I \ ��- / � ! I i i l'-- I -i-�- I I \ 30 � ,_ - \ - f \ I \ \ 14,826 Sq.Ft. \ o I w I - / I / LIJ \ 0.34 A res I / �i / / / � I- - - \ -,, /�- - _ % / \ �' \ __ ', 1 / 1 . / I I I . I / \ I / / / I / / / / I -- /� �/ ��� 11 �� / - �� - 10 ----125 \c, \ / \ / / I I I allo I /I / ��� iLLI/ -� ��'' /� �� \ 25 \ \ \I /- I I , / 1 , 4 � / -� �F /\ I/ \ ' / I I \ - \ \ -L -- -- -- 1- u \ / / / I / S / /f /-.- 9 1 I 149.0 \ \ \ ���1. j I / / I 1 I N 1 - ------ 25� �N / / \ \ \ \ \ \ \ �\ \ / / 17 8 S �t. / /' - \ �'' 16,12 Ft. / / ---___ L -� -� --- ----� - ---\ -N'� / 1 - __ I' /�. ' 18 6�3 S .Ft. I II I 1 � \ \ \ \ P . n / CJ, \ \ i \ I , �q / / \ - \ / , I \ - o� , - I� \ 172' \ I \ o \ \ \ b \ I / / Q.39 �es / I / o+ 0.37 Acres / I / I I ° 1 I \ / I i+� / 0/43 Adres / `1 \ i \ \ � / ,� \ --L-- _\ \ 1 I ` / /4 // / �,.o. // -/ I I 1 \\ I \ \ ' / %I' `° / / / / I ' ") \ \ 4 0 / ink \ � \ \ � - -moi -1 \ 1 / / '�` / \ \ �o ' ' I _ � _ 1 7 I I \ i \ I \ I � o / / N�?\ I \ \ \ \ � \ o � \ \ _' I I/ / / / I/ � - � __ .\\ I / ^/ I cJ / / I / / \\ 1 / \ �/ /.I ^ / / / / I I I \ o \e� \ \ I I z / N \ \_ . \ \ \ I \ . `� to \ \� I \ \-I -' / ' / / / I � - \ . \ I / / / I / � - / \ I 20, 7�Z . Fr. - / I / / I I I rn I k I 14\ 000 S J. Ft. I- -` I - / _ \ \ \ \ \ \ I \ 1 � Q \ \ \_ lI / / / ' \ \ / 114,025 Sq.F . I I/ \ I /� / / Q \1 \ 0.\32 Ac es � o \ 0 \ I \ \ \ o \ \ If \ I � / ---/- - - 9 / � � , � , 1. / / 0.32 Acre � I _` \ M I / 1 / / �/ 1 I \ p \ ,\o� - 0.48 Acres / I I y 9 I I o l v7 �) \ C \ \ , \ �. ^• / l \ _J \ -I- - .r T / / / / , - \ / I / 4s,463 Sq.Ft,r \ S9 I I / I / / 1 / / / I 0 \ \ I 1 I I 1 / � ; - - - - \ I I 14;I� 9 SgVit` \ I % \ \ \ \ / _ --,� 9 , � / I \ ' o. Acres \ I I / I / / X / - J 2 � / \ \ 0.3� cres z \ \ \ \ - 1/- -/- - /- � / i 4 � / I I' I / I / I/ / /_ - I y / 1 1 /1 /- �0 1--I----I-�- / �l_1/ \ I- �\ °. T \ ^ \ c / - / / 1 / // // J I I ' � �_�- / . l \ \ I I /\ x/ /r'O30\ \\ \ I \\ \\ \ i \\ / ,\\ \� \ \ _J I / / // / / 1/ /' \ / \\ \ \ L_--- 1 / / I � / �`� I I I /� --`,050 / _ % / 107' / - \ / -I -/_ 56' ) ,� -J " \ / \ \ \ L- O -----���\// \ \ \ \\ ` ^ \\/� / / / / ,�� -'�-Drainage \\ 131' �1--/-J lL- /- �\ c� I 1 1 Y -- /' / / / �j 1 \ ' �/� / / /' / / -- ' \ \ o / - I \ ,I f -_J \ /_I / /� / /' / I/ 1 / / / \-/ \ � I \ - - - , I \ \ 1 / o / / / / �- I Utility Easein \ -78 / I 1 174 / / / / \ �.� -153 __\ o \ \ o \ %\ 1 / I / ent \ o i" t I \ \ 1 1 91 / / / / / / / /' /i\\ \ \ \ --- / 1/ / / \ \ \ ) I/ / / 211 / \ / / / \ / // / i / I / I / / j r - -� I $ 1 ) ) \ / � / / /�'/ �� \ �- / ge 174' / \ \ 1 I 1 83'\ -' / /' / %s- Dr ihage &/ / i / / / / / / - / \ \ \ T �I I I I I�' I \/ \ / / \ \ \ Drama tg .I/ o / ' x /' � `I I _ \ 1� I TI�� / / �- - ib _ \ - Utillt o ) / / / / / Ility Easement - / / / / / a I / \ �\ ' 1 11. I I I I I o / \ . / I / / 5 / / / A°-, /- /� \ \ - -\ - - -1- f y Easement I /� / \ �I �`�' \ 1 I / / / / I / y / � � rn I /�' I / / / 1*0000 Sq'.1 / 1 rn / I \ 1 I. I `, / ; I \ 1 /26,5/12 s .Ft. / / / / \ /�\ \ f - _4 _ - - _ 1 / ^/ \ �'� / / / I / / o' - / /0.3 /Acres' / - - \ 1 I I I / ,4 I - \ I \ ,\V , \ \ \ - / / �' / - 1°i - '� / / . / \ : � \ 1 1 I I I fi I I I `� / 0.61 A res / / 7 �4 \ / \ \ / I/ I I / / � \ �\ . \ ' v � /' I/ �.\ \ / I _I / / �� / / I / - i / -i / / / / / / \ ,o 1 1 I o / / � \ \ I IIT 0T/ F \ / \ - � / / Imo- / o / - / / \ cNo t S;89D S .Ft. � I 1 / / 248 Sq`Ft. i\o �/ v I L _ �/ I / \ L� \ o o� \ - - - \ \ 1-1 / _ I . 0.361Ac s 1 Io II I I 1 / / / / / / / / /-� 7 Acres\ /� �� \ \ I 1 I / / // r\ \ \ �, =�T- M� // % I/I �� /'%''% 0 1 �� �i �� �I /\ \ / � \ \ \ I I I t / I - I/ / / I / / / /./ \ \ /. o I d / \ �, \ / \ __ I / / / / / / / o I / �►� 1 g / / \ � - - 10AA / / �J / \ 1 \ I I I \ � / / / / / / \ /\ S 1 ^ /' 11 I o � % \ I - I 0 / I I / / ,I / 1 -11- - I- -E 156 '- -�/ 15 1 \ I \ \ I / / / / \ / . / / rn / 1� 8ozisq.Ft! j T \ .; \�( / 25 . \ 1 1 1� \ I \ 3q \3o M'I _ /.I ./- f . / / / / \ \ �[ / \ \ / I 112/ / // \ \:? F� \" \fi 1'� - - -I- - �1 I/ / 0.43 Acres / 1 I / I I 1 / / \ / / \ 1 � 1 I '� \ � _ L - - - V i / / / \ / / \ 15,65 Sq. t. I I I I I Q � h1-1 9� Sq.Ft. L - L - TI 7- - -/ / ,<, \ X0.36` cre I 55 q.F / I 2 a �i \/ 6 273- F4: - � -I-I' 0.43 Ares �'I I /1 I / / / / I I / / I /I I I 1 / 1 I I I \ / -� - - - r ' - \ \ \ 0 - -59„ I / / / / L- ' / ' / / . \ 1 26.60 res �" \ - I 0/ 1 / \ \ / \ \ / / / �' / / - / / / / - 30 I 3 I / I i /9 I I \ 155.116.002010 \ / \ \ \ ' ` - - - _ I / / � ,9 \ I I / 1 I \� . \ \ 0 3ZAcres _ . I / I . / / / / / o / / / I I \ Alan S. & / \ \ \ \ 145 1 I\ \ \ o �3' / �^ \ \ / / / ` \ -. L I .- I/ �. 1 I � - / \\ \\ x� \/ -- / / - 1 / .o'I or � / I o 60 / \ \ I _ - / / / / / _ \ / / / / / \ _ _ ' I I _ - 1 /� / / / - � r / / 1 rn \ Kristin M. Warmka \ - , °tio \ \ o \ 1 1 \ 1 \ \ \ \ O / / C_S �__ \ l l \ \ \ \. 1� / -_ -J / / 11 I I l I ="\Q \ \ l\ \ - - - - - 1J 1 / ' / I � / ,`0Zo I / 1 / __ 14,060 ,S�.Ft. I / I 1 ` Zoning: R-1 / �` \ \ \� \ 1 I \ \ \ -- to __ / / �loe�\ / -___-- \ \ / / _ / / '(� \ \� ___-- I I - / / / i �/ I/ / 0132�crl�s I �� _ / \ - / \ \ t 1 \ \ - / / - / / _ O� /' C�4 �' \ 98.7 �-�L / - - cs -- - - � 1 / / / I <' � \ \ 89', , 11 - --- L.__ /- -r -- C- � y24.5 -- t - -90.0 / 1 / / /105.0 _ / / L \ / _ _ - - - - 1030 - / r- �i �1.� / /' \ \ \ \ I 191 1 \ \ \ \ ---,040-- o ��' �/ /�-3ti ? �� / \ ��-= \ �1 - _ J/ 15 .9/ / / / I I \� �,�_ _ ' J �1-/-�/,+` Imo- /. \ \ \ I o I \ \ M/ / \ \ -�: - L_- ----/- / / / / ---_�- _ ---- /1-r -r /� \ - \ L=10 - _ _ / / I - -90'- - - / / 76 / - o, /_ I / / i / I 155.116.002020 10 `� x,136'-- �o / ,---156-I--- �- \ �\ \ \ `-- ----� / / / / / - ' \ - - L / \ \ 1 \ / / / - \ 3' I - 129 - - --- _--:�( 1- / \ 1 1 1 \ / - e23 - - _-- - / / _ ii / �L� L- l / \ \\ \ \ \ 146' \ \_1� ��\ 30 I --- -' �// �/ LJ / - --' �\ \\ `\\�� \\�---- --- ��/ 0 / I / �_ \ ----' / / // / y'�%�/T -- �1 / / 1.1 I - I � �\ SherreeCraigA. Matson 15 l,_ - ,, 30 - C� 1 - - •a - - \ ' �- ' / 1f / I� / 1 I I I I I i ti ' /' \ Zoning: R-1 - - - �� / - B OU L-E�/A-R-D- _ / / r -/ 20 1\\ \\ \• �\ �__I ',1� / // // -ter_ s , \_ =R oo.o ---- �'--_-�'.- ' //' / _----- _ "I � / y I /�� /1/I/ I I I I II I : I ( /(\/1 \i I / \ 1 \ \ \ --_ I� I �/ / / - I I �\ _ �� _---------i__- -� /, - 430' / / / �� ,-I' / / / � X I-` I I I o I) I I \ I \ \ _ _ I _ -� �� _ �- i /o / I / / I _ I i \ \ - J/ \\ i\ \\ \\ \\��-�-_I - \�\\ `� I /1 // Z/' -I- N - 1��9\ �� -_-_------�--�1 -�/ //'� moi_-- -_ // // / M f' I/ ,/ / ,- �'/1 I/'I I I 111 I o , 1 / I - �f \ / ,. 00 \ \ \ I I \ I // / I �_ -7 l-_ L=8T-----r------ --- _ 41',/ f I I I / _ _,020 100 / 72 , (/ ! - 2 ,3p1 Scj Ft. 25 I / \\ �� I 1 299�q�t. I 1 �� __ -�� I 4;039 S� 'Ft. I 1 / / _- J-=45' ---- _/-105'-- /� -100 --- --- 100 --- - / t� + --�1� // ��/ )< \,' \ 1 '5� 4crfs I 1/ C I / / 1 / \I \ / 0.32/acres --- -- -----� / \ . \ 0.4Q\cres _ _+_ Z_ �I-�'' %'_f �_+ ---- fes- 9p.0 , r _ - �_. 100.0- I_ I__- _ I / x P G�'y \� \ \ I I I l� ' _- tl / / /_ �a-� / -- -� --1000 / I I 1 10 .1 / S/ ,�°, / '�_ I 1020- 111.3- __ �.� __ \� I \ \ \ I I .00 1 �' I I /. - / _ _ - _--1_45-2- - �- -----_----- --- -_ _-_ --- --./ r-� --4I� \ o I \ O°c Fos O, 1 I / / \ - _ - / - - I / �= ----�----------- _ _ fi 1 I 7 / I 1 I I o ,o. o,�\ \ '( p I'> / \ \�Q -I� - N- � L-���----1-� I / 1 / _ / I --_ �I I I I I �`\ , \ 761 ,09,, I I N <I� � f / / \ \ � �I____ I , _ 1 ,_127'' � I f 1� I / _----- -L- I I. I/ -1. I l \\\ I I, 1 / I / \ _11 � 14s' i _o - 1 X5,105 Sq.Ft. / /. I / /� / - / \ \ I I / I I 8 I \ \ \ \ \ _?o .- \ / \ \� 1k ) ., / \ _ � - - - - _ T - 03\ Acres �r ^ 4 / 6 1 I 7 I I _ \ \ \ \ � \ \ 1 / 1155.116.002030 / - \ �- - - - - - I i / / / \ I ao / 100 .. 1 . \ 20,924" F.rt \ \ - ` �� �/ q/ 1 / / \ / Paul A. & \ r \ I I / / / I '"� \ �_ I 14 805 S Ft. / \ I I ) / / � / / / � 18,982 Sq.Ft. I 14, q. '\ 1 / \ 805 S' Ft. � q• \ ` � _ \ I I I I 15,262 S Ft/ 20,360 S Ft. h - / 0.34 Acres- - - -1- -1'- - - 0.48 Ac1re� �o�o � - 6' / \ / \/ Elisa K. Kunde \ \ I / / q• / Sq.Ft./ / / 0.44 Acres - _D.34 Acres I 1 - _ - J I<11\1, Zoning: R-1 / `r 33\ \ _ / 7 \ _ \ 1 I \ I N 1 I �� / / 0.35 Acres` II / . 0.47 Acres T, / I I / - \ - - - �� s / \ I g: �,/J o \ �\ I o -� / / 3 / / -� -- --- � -9 �,c-; I / I \ o, o o I 14,032 Sq.Ft. \ I - _ I / //li S / J I 1L I �T------ ---�-I I �' - - ---- ; / / \ °� I I 14,852' Sq.Ft. o \ 1 0 \ I - \\ �,1 \ 0.32 Acres . , / 1\ #4os- _ _ / I / 1 J 1 \ \ ��yy o \ \ I \ / 4. S9 �c L - - - - - - - - #421 #422 ♦- \ 00 - "5'1 \ \ � I 0.34 Acres \ I - - - \ / / - -_ � Rrai?aV 7 2 1 �] / - _ _ _ _ - - 1 - - _ i�#419? � >� , D�alinage &\Utility Easement r7 r - I - _ / -/ _ �' _ _ , \ 1\ L _I_ \ I _J / / --k i - __ 0 416 M #420 Y \ \` -� - 4\ I M 406 1 ---7\ -- 1� \ -i-& #--#415--->_#41s --- 100'x^ * 100' -- / \ / 1 \ 14' _ � 407 #408 t411 / - � - - N - - - - - \ 211' -20-� __�- --�- \ \ , N 1 N \ I Uti/ Ease 10 '� c�123' i #1 157 --::s - - s =- _�� i f \\ 41 � \ / \ 15' L_ �--149''--' - 30',/ 30' \ I 1---� - \ -4s_ ---i i 103 #410_ ,t / � -`-------- --- ---I------- _ -_- _' - --' u o \ -/ / V / .�_ ___- --__ / 1256.48 ---- _--- _-- --- - \ \ � \ / / / _ _ N �.\ \ \v `�"J BM#1 - S o \ -_ / N88'57'39"E ' -- -- {-- _,o- -� -__ -_ - _--- _ _ v ox i I o l \ i/ii T v \ \ -- ____ ` - ) � -- - - � �_=- -�- -,000- \\ \ o o ,-) /� I I I I\ 1 / \ \ I \ \__ \�_ \\/ ---- �'�� / I//I I I 1 �}- \ 'IN I^,\ r�� T-- nom';- �-- I-) f��`-,� /� qll\_�. T IST\ I -I- \ \ Nw I \ �/ L_ L_ I I \l \7 \ \__ \ / \ \, F111V_L_���,-�� I,'�\1\XVI /I\LJ /\ I I\-/I-� � �� \1 ' I \ \ I I --I \ \ ' \ \ \ \� - r / - -1 1i : \ \ / v � ^ \/ // ////// fi \ /`\ / / _ - / 11010 --' -1_' -' / �\ (/ I I v // I - \ V, �a I 155.201.001070 _ o I I I/ \ \ / 1 / - - - - - _ / / / � - - - - � / Y //////� j'////////1 / _ __ \ v o i � _\ /`/ I o ""/' r , ' r Y / / 155.123.002010 155.123.002020 `/ 1_10.. I Progressive Builders v / I/ /� //� v I / / / - � / / - - / \ \ I I I �////� I / / �� Zoning: R -A � / 14" ^ /1<- / 1 \ / / / / David L. &Mar E. �I �� 155.201.002090 / / Y Angela K. Stillwell I %I I I 1 1 I � IJ J v �j. I lJ Aaron B. Stonestreet / / / / / `fi \_/ 1 I Field Zoning: R-1 F 1 I L - L _ � I L) L- 1 155.201.002100 Zoning: R -A Z / / / / / / \ 1 I 155.199.001040 I 155.199.001030 155.199.001020 155.199.001010 v v � - Zoning: R-1 213.100.241300 I -c - Brent &Alison \ / 155.199.001050 PPM Management, LLC Michael J. Ziegler Sr. Jim Leuer Jim Leuer v () James C. Shultz v r /\ ) I\ / / / \ \ I I I 1 / �� �� I 'I Donnay I- � Jeffrey M. & Zoning: R -A Zoning: R -A Construction, Inc Construction, Inc _ � Revocable trust Zoning: R -A I /-\ I \ I V I/ / / g g � - V V \J \J L) � f�� Lori J. Jacobson Zoning: R -A Zoning: R -A I / / / ../I IN // / // �, \ v \ Zoning: R -A I I I v _ S o / 155.199.001070 \ 155.199.001060 �_ I C, I - L I _ I - L - � 155.201.002080 / / \ �- �- �- � v � / Gregory J. & Zachariah McConnell - /\ � � I T I /� N I SarraAaroR. Cahill / Jennifer L. Pilon \ Zoning: R -A , � I /1 T I I � / Zoning: R -A z -j- 1 I () / \ LJ LJ I 1 I \� I v \ Zoning:R-A / - ` S < cp x\/11\ I /x/11 IL�T ry] I -,II,\ -J1 v `-,uvl \ 1 / / :: / � 33 50 60 - - - /___ / / / � ZY _ - F- - 1 REVISION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was DESIGNED BY: prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I BP �/� �T SPIRIT HILLS SOUTH am a duly Licensed ProfessionLand Surveyor under the RUM M MVER laws of the S11�10tat f Minn DRAWN BY: - FOR - M S S LAND SURVEYORS & ENGME M `HIAN FEHSON LS CHECKED BY: Po Box 1044 Telephone: (763) 389-4476 RA LAND HOLDINGS, LLC f Princeton, MN 55371 Fax: (763) 631-0376 Date 04/08/19 Lic. No. 49138 BP N VICINITY MAP SEC.24, T.121, R.25 NO SCALE --_F-- I I I I 185TH IST. NE N Z in 0 Z Z Z UJ U_ 50 0 50 100 I ON IA I SE 1I I I I SCALE IN FEET II I I L_-- -- -- -- / \ Municipality: City of Monticello Existing Zoning: PUD - Planned Unit Development R -A Residential Amenities District Proposed Zoning: PUD - Planned Unit Development R -A Residential Amenities District Proposed Use: Residential Road Mileage: 3,556 LF or 0.67 Miles Street Lighting as required Proposed Utilities: DENOTES FOUND IRON MONUMENT Sewer: Municipal (available) DENOTES Water: Municipal (available) Plat Area: DENOTES Total Area: 1,083,648 Sq.Ft. = 24.877 Acres Proposed ROW: 223,629 Sq.Ft. = 5.134 Acres Park Area: 0 Sq.Ft. = 0.00 Acres Building Setbacks: Front yard: 30 feet WATER LINE Side Corner: 20 feet DENOTES Rear yard: 30 feet ->- = Side yard: 10 feet Lot Summary: 48 Single Family Residential Lots DENOTES 2 Outlots Owner/Subdivider: R.W. Land Holdings, LLC STORM SEWER MANHOLE P.O. Box 206 DENOTES Princeton, MN 55371 © = (763) 389-1873 ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER Roger Winkelman Designer/Surveyor: Rum River Land Surveyors & Engineers. P.O. Box 1044 Princeton, MN 55371 (763) 389-4476 3601 Thurston Ave. Anoka, MN 5539=03 (763) 427-5860 brian@haa-inc.com \ / DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS: I I N -I- I---6 N 1 6-� -� --J L ---- (NOT TO SCALE) Being 12.00 feet in width and adjoining all right of way lines and rear lot lines unless otherwise shown on this plat and being 6.00 feet in width and adjoining all side lot lines unless otherwise shown on this plat. LEGEND O = DENOTES SET 1/2" x 14" IRON PIPE WITH PLASTIC CAP MARKED "RLS 18420" • = DENOTES FOUND IRON MONUMENT --920-- = DENOTES SURFACE CONTOUR (2 FT. INTERVAL) X = DENOTES GATE VALVE = DENOTES HYDRANT - I - = DENOTES WATER LINE Os = DENOTES SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE ->- = DENOTES SANITARY SEWER LINE ® ® = DENOTES CATCHBASIN = DENOTES STORM SEWER MANHOLE ->>- = DENOTES STORM SEWER LINE © = DENOTES ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER � = DENOTES LIGHT POLE b, = DENOTES UTILITY POLE ,L = DENOTES GUY WIRE -P-oH - = DENOTES OVERHEAD ELECTRIC FH_H1 Q = DENOTES HAND HOLE p = DENOTES TELEPHONE PEDESTAL 1-6 - DENOTES SIGN �� = DENOTES EDGE OF WOODS #425, = DENOTES TAGGED TREE (SEE LETTER) -w = DENOTES EDGE OF DELINEATED WETLAND = 1:1 DENOTES BITUMINOUS SURFACE ° ..< = DENOTES CONCRETE SURFACE = DENOTES GRAVEL SURFACE EXISTING PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: (PID NO. 155.152.000020) (PER COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE BY CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, ISSUED BY HOME SECURITY ABSTRACT & TITLE COMPANY EFFECTIVE FEBRUARY 7, 2019) Outlot B, Spirit Hills, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, Wright County, Minnesota. NOTES: 1. The professional surveyor has made no investigation or independent search for easements of record, encumbrance, restrictive covenants, ownership title evidence, or any other facts that an accurate and current title search may disclose. 2. The underground utilities shown have been located from field survey information per Gopher State One Call Ticket Nos. 190220779, 190220780, 190220781,190220785 and record plans. The surveyor makes no guarantees that the underground utilities shown comprise all such utilities in the area, either in service or abandoned. The surveyor further does not warrant that the underground utilities shown are in the exact location indicated although he does certify that they are located as accurately as possible from information available. The surveyor has not physically located the underground utilities. Prior to any excavation, contact Gopher State One Call for an on-site location (651-454-0002). The subsurface utility information on this survey is utility quality level D. This quality level was determined according to the guidelines of CI/ASCE 38-2, entitled "Standard Guidelines for the Collection and Depiction of Existing Subsurface Utility Data. 3. Bearings are based on the record plat of SPIRIT HILLS. 4. Project Benchmark: MnDOT Monument "BAUER MNDT AZ MK". Elevation = 957.05 (NGVD 1929) Site Benchmark #1: Top Nut Hydrant on the west side of Bison Avenue; 150 feet north of Bison Circle. Elevation = 1012.64 (NGVD 1929) Site Benchmark #2: Top Nut Hydrant in the southwest quadrant of Wildwood Way and Wildwood Boulevard. Elevation = 1034.15 (NGVD 1929) 5. Site contains no wetlands per City of Monticello staff. PRELIMINARY PLAT CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA SHEET 1 OF 1 SHEETS P-4367.01 /IA J W Cn 0 Z Q CY 0 z Q J W C� Z_ W W W Z CD z E W n 00 0-)� o� N W Ua o > ry L n Q J L�. \1; r 7nJ I ISI 0I 85TH STREET NE RUM RIVER LAND SURVEYORS & ENGINEERS PO Box 1044 Telephone: (763) 389-4476 Princeton, MN 55371 Fax: (763) 631-0376 lgTF 94 SPIRIT HILLS SOUTH SITE DEVELOPMENT AND CONSTRUCTION PLANS I FOR R.W. LAND HOLDINGS, LLC. IN THE CITY OF MONTICELLO THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION IN THIS PLAN IS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF CI/ASCE 38-02, ENTITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." GOVERNING SPECIFICATIONS ALL STREET CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO STANDARDS & SPECIFICATIONS. ALL SANITARY SEWER CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO STANDARDS & SPECIFICATIONS. ALL STORM SEWER CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO STANDARDS & SPECIFICATIONS. ALL WATER DISTRIBUTION CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO THE MOST �--� RECENT EDITION OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO STANDARDS & SPECIFICATIONS. �LA BENCHMARKS: 1Q TNH WEST SIDE OF BISON AVENUE, 160 FEET NORTH OF BISON CIRCLE. ELEV=1012.64 02 TNH IN THE SOUTHWEST QUADRANT OF WILDWOOD WAY AND WILDWOOD BOULEVARD. ELEV=1034.15 11 X DEVELOPER/OWNER R.W. LAND HOLDINGS, LLC. P.O. BOX 206 PRINCETON, MN 55371 ROGER WINKELMAN 763-389-1873 ENGINEER/SURVEYOR RUM RIVER LAND SURVEYORS AND ENGINEERS P.O. BOX 1044 PRINCETON, MN 55371 CRAIG J. JOCHUM, P.E. BRIAN PERSON, P.L.S. 763-427-5860 763-427-0520 (FAX) VI I I VI IVIVIV 1 IVLLL%, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA 600 0 600 1200 SCALE IN FEET PAVING SHALL NOT START UNTIL SUBGRADE COMPACTION TESTS HAVE BEEN TAKEN AND ROADWAY CONDITIONS ARE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. SHEET INDEX THIS PLAN CONTAINS 37 SHEETS SHEET NO. DESCRIPTION 1 TITLE SHEET 2 TYPICAL LOT SECTIONS AND FILTRATION BASIN DETAIL 3 LOT TABULATIONS 4-8 DETAILS 9 CONSTRUCTION AND GRADING NOTES 10-11 EXISTING CONDITIONS AND REMOVALS PLAN 12-13 GRADING, DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN 14-17 SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN—WILDWOOD BOULEVARD 18-20 SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN—BISON AVENUE 21-24 STREET AND STORM SEWER—WILDWOOD BOULEVARD 25-27 STREET AND STORM SEWER—BISON AVENUE 28 TRAI L—OUTLOT A & B 29-30 TRAIL—FENNING AVENUE 31-36 PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP DETAILS 37 TREE PRESERVATION PLAN I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed P fessiona Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. �. 23461 DATE 4/8/19 CRAIG JO HUM, f.E. LIC. NO. APPROVED BY CITY ENGINEER DATE REVISION DATE SHEET 1 OF 37 SHEETS P-4367.01 z Q J n / 0 z tY W W z z E Q! -to Ln I � I ED N 00 > o n, n n Q _ 30(MIN.) 1� _ EL. OF GROUND AT - -_ WALKOUT 7.7' BELOW 20' (MIN.) GARAGE SLAB UNLESS \ OTHERWISE NOTED. EL. OF GROUND AT 1 1 - 10 WALKOUT 8.2' BELOW i GARAGE SLAB UNLESS \ OTHERWISE NOTED. 4" TOPSOIL t \ .7 i \�J .10 _ ENGINEERED i �� III—III—III—III—III—III—III—III—I — II—III-1 50' - LOT PAD 2.0' HOLD DOWN Q� IMl FINISHED GRADE W SHOWN ON GRADING GARAGE FLOOR PLAN 6" TOPSOIL BASEMENT i — FLOOR_ / ENGINEERED FILL L 6" TOPSOIL IIS _ SUITABLE BEARING SOIL (TYP.) 1 2 30' (MIN.)1Q - EL. OF GROUND AT LOOKOUT 4.7' BELOW i 20' (MIN.) GARAGE SLAB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. \ EL. OF GROUND AT LOOKOUT 5.2' BELOW GARAGE SLAB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. i 4" TOPSOIL �. N:/ -,—ENGINEERED i CD �G :411= �ll.1ll.1JIll.Jl . II II,II II II II�_IH, TI R. 0. W. 30' I VARIES 17' INTERIMI GRADE 2% T6' TOPSOIL ENGINEERED FILL FULL BASEMENT WALKOUT SUITABLE BEARING SOIL (TYP.) R. 0. W. 50' - LOT PAD 30' I VARIES - - 17' 2.0 HOLD DOWN a M FINISHED GRADE Uj INTERIM SHOWN ON GRADING GARAGE FLOOR U' GRADE PLAN 2% �� L6" TOPSOIL ENGINEERED FILL �� 6 TOPSOIL Q I i -i I - BASEMENT I�II�II�II II �ILll i FLOOR_ / ENGINEERED FILL II III 111 n ll— I I i I II .I IIIEII�i11=1' =,//—ENGINEERED / SUITABLE BEARING SOIL (TYP.) L6" TOPSOIL / �iI�11J�lil iI II - SUITABLE BEARING SOIL (TYP.) FULL BASEMENT LOOKOUT NOTES: 1. SEE SHEET 9 FOR ADDITIONAL CONSTRUCTION AND GRADING INFORMATION. DATE REVISION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was DESIGNED BY: prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I CJJ am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the StateMinn ota. DRAWN BY: i MSS C AI ` J. - OCHUM, P.E. CHECKED BY: Date 4/8/19 Lic. No. 23461 TAE 30' (MIN.) 1� - 50' - LOT PAD 20' (MIN.) FINISHED GRADE — 2.0' HOLD DOWN Q� SHOWN ON GRADING m PLAN W GARAGE FLOOR Ul ---- °` -------- ------T- �. 6" TOPSOIL ^ENGINEERED ENGINEERED FILL - - -I FI LL _JJ111'' fi NON- _ __=1Ti-IIIIII _T- STRUCTURALIi=S III ISI IIIIIIiiii 11Th _ _ FI LL LL ' _I I SUITABLE BEARING SOIL (TYP.) -' ' SII 2 FULL BASEMENT 2 SILT FENCE RUM RIVER LAND SURVEYORS - ENGIlNBERS PO Box 1044 Telephone: (763) 389-4476 Princeton, MN 55371 Fax: (763) 631-0376 R. 0. W. 30' I INTERIM GRADE I VARIES 17' 2% L6" TOPSOIL ENGINEERED FILL CATEGORY 3 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET A MINIMUM OF 8 FEET WIDE TO FILTER THE STORMWATER PRIOR TO ENTERING THE FILTRATION BASIN — SEED BASIN BOTTOM WITH MIXTURE 33-262 ELEV=SEE GRADING PLAN— —1 INCH OF FREE DRAINING ON SITE 4:1 �` TOPSOIL r r T■ SUITABLE BEARING SOIL (TYP.) OFILTRATION BASIN SECTION NO SCALE SILT FENCE REFERENCE NOTES: 10 MAXIMUM GRADE OF 12 PERCENT A MINIMUM OF 30 FEET FROM BACK OF LOT PAD. 02 THE FILTRATION BASINS SHALL NOT BE COMPACTED. ONLY WIDE TRACK, LOW PRESSURE EQUIPMENT SHALL BE USED. CONTRACTOR SHALL SCARIFY THE TOP 3 FEET OF THE FILTRATION BASIN SUBGRADE SOIL AFTER GRADING IS COMPLETED BUT PRIOR TO ADDING THE FILTER MEDIA. SHEET TYPICAL LOT SECTIONS 2 SPIRIT HILLS SOUTH AND FILTRATION BASIN DETAIL of CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA 37 SHEETS P-4367.01 z Q J n CD z ry w w z CD E Qw n 0 0 DATE LOT BLOCK 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 6 6 HOUSE TYPE FBLO FBWO FBWO FBWO FBWO FB FB FB FB FB FB FB FB FB FBWO FBWO FBWO FBWO FBWO FBWO FBWO FBWO FB FB FB FB FB FB FBWO FBWO FBWO FBWO FBWO FBWO FBWO FBWO FBWO FB FBLO FBWO FBWO FBWO FBWO FBWO FBWO FBWO FBWO FBWO CENTERLINE OF STREET 1029.3 1035.9 1043.7 1050.8 1054.1 1055.9 1056.0 1054.4 1053.3 1053.6 1054.7 1054.9 1040.3 1038.9 1039.9 1055.9 1053.2 1054.0 1054.3 1054.8 1049.4 1043.4 1020.5 1023.1 1025.6 1030.4 1029.5 1027.9 1032.5 1018.7 1019.4 1023.4 1030.3 1037.2 1040.2 1040.1 1038.5 1016.0 1022.9 1028.2 1029.4 1030.4 1027.5 1024.7 1021.6 1019.1 1023.1 1015.8 ** DENOTES TWO (2) COURSE DROP REVISION LOT TABULATION GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION 1032.9 1039.5 1047.3 1053.5 1055.5 1058.6 1058.7 1057.1 1056.9 1057.2 1057.0 1057.2 1043.9 1042.5 1043.5 1057.2 1054.6 1055.3 1055.7 1056.2 1050.8 1044.8 1024.1 1026.7 1029.2 1034.0 1033.1 1031.5 1036.1 1020.0 1020.7 1024.7 1031.6 1038.6 1042.5 1043.3 1042.1 1019.6 1026.5 1029.6 1030.7 1031.8 1028.8 1026.0 1023.0 1020.5 1026.7 1019.4 DRIVEWAY GRADE 8.0% 8.0% 8.0% 6.0% 3.0% 6.0% 6.0% 6.0% 8.0% 8.0% 5.0% 5.0% 8.0% 8.0% 8.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 8.0% 8.0% 8.0% 8.0% 8.0% 8.0% 8.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 5.0% 7.0% 8.0% 8.0% 8.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 8.0% 8.0% LOWEST LIVABLE FLOOR ELEVATION 1025.15 1031.77 1039.63 1045.77 1047.78 1050.91 1051.00 1049.38 1049.17 1049.46 1049.27 1049.47 1036.22 1034.81 1035.79 1049.52 1046.87 1047.63 1047.99 1048.48 1043.09 1037.05 1016.35 1018.95 1021.50 1026.25 1025.42 1023.77 1028.37 1012.34 1013.01 1017.02 1023.91 1030.86 1034.76 1035.56 1035.77 1011.91 1018.83 1021.86 1023.03 1024.05 1021.14 1018.33 1015.29 1012.78 1018.97 1011.65 LOWEST OPENING ELEVATION 1028.15 1031.77 1039.63 1045.77 1047.78 1058.61 1058.70 1057.08 1056.87 1057.16 1056.97 1057.17 1043.92 1042.51 1035.79 1049.52 1046.87 1047.63 1047.99 1048.48 1043.09 1037.05 1024.05 1026.65 1029.20 1033.95 1033.12 1031.47 1028.37 1012.34 1013.01 1017.02 1023.91 1030.86 1034.76 1035.56 1035.77 1019.61 1021.83 1021.86 1023.03 1024.05 1021.14 1018.33 1015.29 1012.78 1018.97 1011.65 I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State Minn ota. i ��C-Al J. JOCHUM, P.E. Date 4�8�19 Lic. No. 23461 DESIGNED BY: CJJ RUM RIVER DRAWN BY: MSS LAND SURVEYORS & ENGINEERS CHECKED BY:Po Box 1044 Telephone: (763) 389-4476 TAE 7�1Princeton, MN 55371 Fax: (763) 631-0376 SPIRIT HILLS SOUTH LOT TABULATIONS CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA SHEET 3 37 SHEETS z Q J n z Fy w w z CD E aw L o DATE MANHOLE STEPS SHALL BE CAST IRON OR MA MODEL PS -I -PF (BY MA INDUSTRIAL INC.) CONFORMING TO ALL OSHA REGULATIONS AND SPACED 16" OC. GROUTING BETWEEN PIPE AND MANHOLE BARREL SHALL BE WITH NON -SHRINKING CEMENT U EM O O USE R-2 JOINT FOR ALL MANHOLE JOINTS BARREL TO CONFORM TO ASTM C-478 LATEST REVISION STANDARD MANHOLE FRAME AND COVER ADJUSTING RINGS MIN 4" - MAX 12" 27" DIA WITH EXTERNAL OR o INTERNAL CHIMNEY SEAL C I 8 48" DIA Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Title: Cone Section, Casting Steps, and Adjusting Rings Date:03-05 Plate No. Revised: (J3 —15 100 1 O - O 1 NOTE: JJ 1. STRUCTURE MARKER SIGNS AND 3" TUBING WITH 2-1- REFLECTORIZED STRIPS SHALL BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED FOR ALL STRUCTURES LOCATED OFF THE STREET SURFACE. (INCIDENTAL) �J 2.:i" TUBING SHALL BE ATTACHED TO SIGN POST 3. THE SIGNS MAYBE OMITTED AS PER THE ENGINEER 4. 1HE SIGNS SHALL BE BURIED 2' BELOW FINISHED GRADE WI7}I 4' OF POST EXPOSED 5. SIGNS SHALL FACE TRAFFIC 0.063" THICK ALUMINUM SIGN. BLACK LETTERS ON WHITE HIGH INTENSITY REFLECTORIZED BACKGROUND. U—CHANNEL POST, MINIMUM 1.2 L.B./FT. 6' LONG, GALVANIZED. Structure Marker Standard Plate Library Sign City of Monticello Date: (J3-05 Plate No. �—�- Revised: 1005 03-15 REVISION /r USE NEENAH R -1642—A FOR LOW PROFILE APPLICATIONS USE NEENAH R1755—G FOR WATERTIGHT APPLICATIONS LETTERING TO READ: SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER OR WATER MAIN WHICH EVER IS APPLICABLE. "'«"'^H R-1642 WITH 3 SOLID LID VE BEARING OR 4'x4 25 3/4 " BEARINP SURFACE TO BE MACHINED COVER CONCEALED PICKHOLES (2) EAT OPPOSITE SI EXCEPT FOR LETTERI L 24" 28 1/2 36" Title: FRAME Standard Frame Indard Plate Library and Cover City of Monticello Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised: 1002 03-15 STEEL T -STYLE FENCE POST PAINTED BLUE WITH AN OIL BASED PAINT FOR WATERMAIN STUB PAINTED GREEN WITH AN OIL BASED PAINT FOR SANITARY AND/OR STORM SEWER STUB AND A MINIMUM 2" REFLECTORIZED TAPE (ENGINEER GRADE) AT THE TOP OF THE POST POST SHALL BE BURIED 2' BELOW FINISHED GRADE WITH 4' ABOVE FINISHED GRADE (INCIDENTAL) Standard Plate Library City of Monticello EET !E STORM SEWER WATERMAIN MAINLINE SANITARY SEWER Title: Utility Stub Markers Date: 04-08 Plate No. Revised:1006 o3-15 I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was DESIGNED BY: prepared by me or under my direct supervision am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under and that I the laws CJJ of the State Minn ota. j DRAWN BY: MSS JI \ "J. �C_ AI Date 4/8/19 JOCHUM, P.E. Lic. No. 23461 CHECKED BY: TAE NOTE: CASTINGS AND VALVE BOXES NOT ADJUSTED WITHIN THE TOLERANCES SHOWN SHALL BE READJUSTED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. FINISHED BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE GRADE 3/8"MIN. 5/8 MAX. FRAME CASTING AND GATE VALVE NOT ON CENTERLINE ROADWAY FINISHED BITUMINOUS WEAR 5/8 MIN COURSE GRADE 3/8 " MIN. 3/4 MAX 2 00$ 5/8 MAXI FRAME CASTING ON CENTERLINE: Standard Plate Library City of Monticello TOP OF PROPOSED SUBGRADE Title: Adjustment of Standard Frame and Cover Date: Plate No. 03—C)5 Revised: 03-15 '1003 THE TOP 3' SHALL BE COMPACTED AT A MIN OF 100% OF STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY (MN/DOT 2105) O A MAX OF 2' LIFTS TO BE WETTED AND CONSOLIDATED BY VIBRATORY MEANS AND COMPACTED TO A MIN OF 95% OF STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY (MN/DOT 2105) 4' COVER COMPACTED TO 95% OF STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY WITHOUT THE USE OF HEAVY ROLLER EQUIPMENT U GRANULAR BEDDING AS PER MN/DOT 3149.2F GRANULAR FOUNDATION WHERE ORDERED BY THE ENGINEER SHOVEL, PLACE, AND HAND COMPACT AROUND PIPE TO 12" ABOVE PIPE. VIBRATORY COMPACTION REQUIRED EACH SIDE OF PIPE, AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. Standard Plate Library City of Monticello --- RUM PJIVER LAND SURVEYORS & ENGINEERS PO Box 1044 Telephone: (763) 389-4476 Princeton, MN 55371 Fax: (763) 631-0376 Title: Typical Trench Compaction and Class B Bedding Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised: 03 —15 1007 SPIRIT HILLS SOUTH /r 3d 5d 3/8" MIN, 5/8" MAX. BITUMINOUS NON -WEAR COURSE BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE ADJUSTMENT DETAIL F9S SUPER GLUE )HESIVE OR ENGINEER APPROVED )DIVALENT (1/4" BEAD, 360 DEG.) BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE NOTES: 1. THE HEIGHT OF THE CAST IRON OR DUCTILE IRON ADJUSTMENT RING IS DETERMINED BY THE THICKNESS OF THE OVERLAY. 2. CAST IRON OR DUCTILE IRON ADJUSTMENT RINGS TO BE INSTALLED AS PER MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDATION. 3. A 5 YEAR WARRANTY IS REQUIRED FOR ADJUSTMENT RINGS INCLUDING LABOR & MATERIALS BITUMINOUS NON—WEAR COURSE CAST IRON OR DUCTILE IRON ADJUSTMENT RING AS MANUFACTRURED BY ESS BROTHERS AND SONS INC. OR ENGINEER APPROVED EQUAL BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE ADJUSTMENT DETAIL Title: Standard Plate Library Metal Casting Ring Adjustment Detail City of Monticello Date:03_U8 Plate No. G \ Revised: 03-15 1004 SHEET DETAILS 4 CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA 37 SHEETS P-4367.01 O .. Pl OR 5' IN BACK OF CI M IF OONCRETE WALM OR B17JJNINCUB PATH ARE NYDRAFINDER PRESEKT r WA7ZFZ 11ACHL a7 HYDRANYELLDW OUT OF 01100 TO TD BE INSTALLM ON PUF.dPPpR CONN, O ER BACK -FILL 9 EAIMFF FLANDE EmSTIND OR FUTURE 1' TG r hk)*AUM CURB OR GUTTER LINE ABOVE BURY UNE [FIMISHEG ORADE7 r FINISHED GRADE VALYE Boil AS ; NATE N SPECIFIED 7S l "TS' , 2 LAYER$ Of - I- 2'- It. AX RE9.1ijaz 7� POLY 0 enl.) - IY�;AL 3 I i }' DIAkFTER BY V DEEP PIT , UNDER *WNIT FILLED WITH = 1/4 "STEEL vAL1�E BOX ADAPT"A 1�i MUM ❑F 1 C,Y. OF 1 1-11ir CLEAR STONE 'V17H PR07WTJA OZATJ40 AS � MPi9APPR IIREG ADAPTOR IMP. � � � OR APP3lOVEA EQ42JLIAL MERALUO MEDAiLUO THRUSTj '' MESALUG L SATE VALVE L 7EE 81.0014110 9LOCKING BEHINT ®ELOY1 GATE T.NRUNT HYDRANT PRECW GONCAIETE BA#E 6Li}ptlh3 AS SPECIFIED i13 w ON 41 kri;ry. Standard Plate Library Typical Hydrant Installation Cit of Monticello a0t*: 03-03 P143t4;! rte, �• Revised: 2001 03-1 7 � B'X 12' INSULA7JM AT P19O GRGSSiNO VX 20' INSULA71ON SEE PLATE 2=6 LY,A MTLli it ALL PIPE CIN73 WITHIN I D' OF A IID SHALL BE RESTRAINED USINO TIE A003, PROPOSE) STORAd SES+T71R 41r NNOS 'B" ME�iLUl3� ' 11' 1 � � PA' � �f TEE ARID END dpS3ALUlI SID r' RAP PLU3 WITH i MIL, POLY ' PLUG PLUG NOTM 1, THRUST BLDCONO TO BE USED FOR BEND 12 1/2 mo OVER PIPE 311E BEAR11I0 AREA 3, 74RAT SLCCNIND SH&L Dfivf EE USED WHERE 1YARKi10 afLIAE8 ARE LESS THAN tErO PBI, I ` - ts^ ( a. 714111UNT BLOCKS MIARINC AREA TO RE FZU1 M CIO SC FT AGAINST UNDISTURBED SOIL, 4. PC+1 is OCA1C19lRE RL=INO ._ _77 SHALL X USED FOR 10 OR LAI$ fR DIAMF71!R WATFRMWN ALL PIKE ,1CINTS WITHIN 10 PT. Of A BEND SHALL BE FSBTA114ED UPW TIE ROIDS Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Title: Blocking for aterrnain l)ott:: 03-05 Plate No, Ray'lood:03-17 2002 STEEL T -STYLE FENOE POST PAINTED BLUE WITH AN OIL BASED PAINT AND MINIMUM 8" REFIEGTORIIED TAPE r N4ilNEEi4 iiRAGE AT THE TOP OF THE PCS7 7O MARK OURS STOP. TG BE INSTA AT THE TIME OF CURS 3701P INSTALLATION SRIGICENTALJ —Ir 4' V STf7 73' 12' " AsRQVRED AS REQUIRED - GROUND LINE As fl"/—GRGUNC LINE 2' L� 2' rNMALU7 CURB SOX WITH 1'- 1 1/4 'STANDPIPE AND STATIONARY ROD y_ a, WIN 1' CORP'. COCK �IAR� �- OR1214 1" COPPER; 1" COPPRIG ER - Bk 4' k +B' k rWATEFVAN V IN E" X 2" CAP CURB STOP �Y TH BLANK SLUG tTYPICALr NOTE, ATTACH SHUT OF POD 70 CURS =P SEE SPEC. TR)9: I standard Plate LibraryVatermain let Citi of Monticello, O3—,� 11� Na �i�:03-17 00 DATE REVISION Standard Plate Library Clity of Monticello Title: Typical ''dater Service kt"' 03-05 Pats No- R1mud''03-1 2006 I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was DESIGNED BY: prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I CJJ am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the StateMinn ota. i DRAWN BY: MSS AI J. JOCHUM, P.E. CHECKED BY: Date 4/8/19 Lic. No. 23461 TAE ° EXhTTIND L+R FINISHED) DRAOE PLUDRA:G ENG 4' NOSES, 1, REUSE E1:'1B'T1N0 AUR BLEED LINES AND PLUOS 1' �RPGRA7ICN STO4 GH PROPOSED YN55. INSTALLATION TO UE MADE AT NO ADD MNAL 4OOMPENSAIICN, FURNISH NEW GASKETS WERE REQUIRED. L .NEW UNEI 'NLL BE PAID FOR AT UNIT PRICE DD FOR I" COPPER AND 1" OORPDRATICN SM12. ALL OTHER WATERMAIH 'HONK TO BE INCIDENTAL TO THE PROJEV, ti L I' CABER PLUMED ENG AIR BLEED GETAI L STEEL T -STYLE FENCE POST PAINTED BaLUE'NTH AN OIL BASED PA147 AND MINIMUM 2' REFLW70RIZM TAPE {ENOINEER GRACE) AT THE TOP OF THE POST TO }BARK VALVE BOX. T9 BE INSTALLED AT THE TIME OF VALW BCM a, INSTALLATION {INCIDENTAL} NOTE flRGUNIf LINE IF GATE VALVE ARE EXTENDED, THERE SHALL BE A {SATE VALVE NUT EK7ENSION T4 WITHIN 7.E° OF FINISHED GRADE AND ATTADHED 1 TO THE GATE VALVE NUT t 1 VALVE BOX 1 1/2" RUE4M GASKET INST LLED BETWEEN THE GATE VALVE ANI} GATE VALVE ADAPTOR 1/1 CA!. VD. ORAVEL —,I 1 GATE vALW WIN7 ){UHLE98 OTHBVM MM r 1, 4" STEEL IiALVE BOX ADAPTOR WITH PROTECTIVE COATING AS WANUFACTURED BY ADAPTOR INC. OR APPROVED EQUAL VALVE BOX INSTALLA MN Standard Plate Library City of Monticello RUM RIVER LAND SURVEYORS & ENGIlNBERS PO Box 1044 Telephone: (763) 389-4476 Princeton, MN 55371 Fax: (763) 631-0376 WATERMAIN Title; Air Bleed Detail And Valve Box Installation 03-05 Iata1l�, R"Bod'03-15 2003 N SPIRIT HILLS SOUTH GRASSY AREA :_ TT 8'WIDE - }"THICK LESS THAN B' IM'RCFDAM HI -38 BRANT EQUAL FOM OR APPRE 00br.RETE CR ftjj affl UR SURFACE ti B'r 4' a 4' THI X LESS THAN 4, STAGGER SHEE-S d-' LENGTH vASE ALIO 2' 'WIDTH 'h1SE N070 INSULATION XQUIRED FOR WA7ERJvWN WUH LESS MA41 V CCVCR IN OR.ASSY AREAS AND V CCER UNDER PAYED SURFACES. Title: Insulation Standard Plate Library Detail City of Monticello: 03_05 I "", R""a:03-1 5 2004 SHEET DETAILS 5 CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA 3 SHEEE TS P-4367.01 Z Q J n / z 1r W W z Ew o / 00 � D 0-) nI 0/ NW Q �> 0n, L_ n n Q DATE MU71NO SET"NEEM PIPE AND FAAMNOLE BARREL SHALL SE W17H NON-SHRINKIHO CEMENT ALL MANHDLES WTH INSIDE RO DP SEUTiON SHALL HE 8' CIA OA.) CHIMSESi *ALB OWER0! - DR FXTK MNk) "MtEY ISP. APPFF*iEG EQUAL" i STANDARD mANHOLE i FF:AME ANA OCYER J. — v. �' • AflrUSTING 14JWS WIN 4" - MAX 1.7.' I 27' DIA c � 1 FAANHCL.E SECTXDN TA BE ��°�• F:' AM C-478 OL41 II CIRCULAR REINF 4• �;� T LATEST REVISICW �v F: i; LSE R -T MINT FOR All MANHOLE JOINTS y 4 STEPS AT v� ' ,. 1 B° OD r ; "EIRE-SEAL",'RESEAL OR AFRMT ,tD EWA PRECAST GIAIKEr CONNECTION 94A,LL BE USED ;•� ; FOR CON.NECTICN PIPE TO MAFINULf drUl64@L.E 5r i MAX. 24" z MIN PRECAST B017GM SECTION MtlTH INVERT #5 AT 12° 0 EACH WAY STANDARD MANHOLE FOR SANITARY SEWER NO SCALE NOTES: C,' FAANHOLE STEPS SHALL BE CAST IRON OR MA MODEL PS -I -PF ATA INDUSTRItk INC.) OCTNTORM43 T4 AI -L OSHA RMLATJON6 C SPACED 16 flC IF CROP 18 GREATER THAN E4" INCHES, USE OUTSIDE DRCP, Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Title: Standard Sanitary Manhole DTtL 03-05 I DIt�! lea, ReAlmd=03-15 3001 li' ALL AROUND �INCIDENTAQ 3 ''WATER TIGHT GASNET ` II OR CEMENTED PLUG: — I � -- — 4 Y FIX 4DRIIONTAL WYE {P1+Gj THRUST BLOWIND FGR OLEANINQ EQUIPMENT 1. PAYMENT FOR 6" RISER PIPE 4" VERTICAL WYE 4B' SEND AMD PLUG WILL BE PAID MR AT UNIT PRICE E4 D PER EACH. T. CLFM-CUTS REQUIRED AT 70' INTERVALS FROM AGAIN SEWER UNE. Standard Plate Library City of Monticello REVISION Title: Sanitary Clean -Out Datc 03i -0,q Re> eead:0113-15 PIIia No. 3006 FOR COMPLETE TYPE "A" DROP SE; T,VDN UNIT PAIGE SHAD 11}OLUCE AW OJI70 INTO MASE BAK PEOAJIREG, EU�Zw, TEE PIPE, SLIPIPW7 A8 REQUIRM PRE yAST �40RErE MANIHME mpC-NS DUCTILE FRGNI TEEONE LE)ATH _ s OF DO N UEU 13F emCAL O]L "---I I- ---- NDGr TC AWHDLE T_ _—�— .e .A ti ,ETE HDRIMIOE 40 CD11D1lETI MORTAR ALL SIDES 'S�I }a }} .z i_ }L m ]El ri° ME DRILL i5:Y �CT TO MANHOLE OILIER EASE Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Tfft Outside Drop Sr%.tion for Sonitary Manhole cam. X33-04Ptati �, P"4":03-15 3002 I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State Minn ota. LC Al J. HUM, P.E. Date 4/8/19Lic. No. 23461 DESIGNED BY: CJJ DRAWN BY: MSS CHECKED BY: TAE LEPTil CF COVER i31F}k TAP OF PIPE TO SUIT FIELD OCNDRION9 PIPE SHALL BE ODUPLETELY ENTRENCHED�I AND 'SHALL HAWSE CLASS 'a' BEDDING VMERE DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER TIES RIMIREG TO :LEAN OUT$ USE 4' OR I" CISP PLUG AND OAP, ; MINIMUM Z' REFLEATCRIYED TAPE TOP Ti} BEI f2 ' BELOW FlNdHEl7 SAE �E]dGINEERF�vAG�E AT THE PDP OF THE PP +SSii TDI MARK 77HHE SERVICE STUB M J � FINISHED GONE i INSTALLATION {INCIDENTAL,) 4' OR 6" PVC . YJ" PYC RESER FOR NAW-RESIGENTUL 4" PVC RIMR FM IRSOICENTIAL VARIES IV TC Z8' #' OGS J" YERITC�,L. WYE {P1FCj 1�d BEND Q — CCNTCtlETE ENCA.S8 ENT li' ALL AROUND �INCIDENTAQ 3 ''WATER TIGHT GASNET ` II OR CEMENTED PLUG: — I � -- — 4 Y FIX 4DRIIONTAL WYE {P1+Gj THRUST BLOWIND FGR OLEANINQ EQUIPMENT 1. PAYMENT FOR 6" RISER PIPE 4" VERTICAL WYE 4B' SEND AMD PLUG WILL BE PAID MR AT UNIT PRICE E4 D PER EACH. T. CLFM-CUTS REQUIRED AT 70' INTERVALS FROM AGAIN SEWER UNE. Standard Plate Library City of Monticello REVISION Title: Sanitary Clean -Out Datc 03i -0,q Re> eead:0113-15 PIIia No. 3006 FOR COMPLETE TYPE "A" DROP SE; T,VDN UNIT PAIGE SHAD 11}OLUCE AW OJI70 INTO MASE BAK PEOAJIREG, EU�Zw, TEE PIPE, SLIPIPW7 A8 REQUIRM PRE yAST �40RErE MANIHME mpC-NS DUCTILE FRGNI TEEONE LE)ATH _ s OF DO N UEU 13F emCAL O]L "---I I- ---- NDGr TC AWHDLE T_ _—�— .e .A ti ,ETE HDRIMIOE 40 CD11D1lETI MORTAR ALL SIDES 'S�I }a }} .z i_ }L m ]El ri° ME DRILL i5:Y �CT TO MANHOLE OILIER EASE Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Tfft Outside Drop Sr%.tion for Sonitary Manhole cam. X33-04Ptati �, P"4":03-15 3002 I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State Minn ota. LC Al J. HUM, P.E. Date 4/8/19Lic. No. 23461 DESIGNED BY: CJJ DRAWN BY: MSS CHECKED BY: TAE LEPTil CF COVER i31F}k TAP OF PIPE TO SUIT FIELD OCNDRION9 PIPE SHALL BE ODUPLETELY ENTRENCHED�I AND 'SHALL HAWSE CLASS 'a' BEDDING VMERE DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER SEE ,1CINT DETAIL BELOW MIN PLACE NEARLY HDROONTAL FOR LOW 1 EASEMEMiB AHC SHALLOW SEINER AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER TYPICAL SERXE WHpE CSER 0VER TOP OF SEWER IS 12 OR LESS NOTES; PVC - POLY -MM CHLORIDE 'IDR 26 DEPTH OF CCVER OVER TOP OF PIPE TO $LIT ALL 9ERYICE CCNNEGi14Nd INCLUDINO NECEd'SARY FIELD OOFMDITFOARB SENDS AND SPECIAL FTTTINOS SHALL BE PAID FOR AT THE SDNTRACT UNIT PRICE DID PER LINEAR FOOT OF 4" OR 8 . NO ADDITICNAL CZWPENEAT404 814ALL BE ALLOWED FCR CGSNORM FN04ENPIt AR PIPE t't MING• �r CSI ENCASEMENT B. AKIN 4" OR B" PVC i DF'RA1N1 AND WnWTi' EASEMENT r' 0. `411�7 ELEV TO BE SET BY THE ENGINEER - CONTRAMM TO VERIFY P1dOR 70 BURY PIPE 'SHALL BE t LETELY ENTRENCHED AND SMALL NAME CLASS 'S' SEMOING YMERE DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER SEE DETAIL BELOW FOR G4DUCNG 13ETWEEN DISSIMILAR PIPES ADAPTOR TO BE RESILIENT 1 'TOP OF OF S EREI S12 OR�MORE OVER ASTM C4" -Ai T17E nl OR APPROVED FAUAL FOR DISSiM1LAR PIPES CCNDRETE U40ASEMENT 3F � PUC WE F— I/CF TO PIC FEiNCO ENCASED IN i cONC11=7E 81 -ALL BE NECUIREC ;: ;?' ,'';?•�; WHEN CONNECTI YG TO EXISTING ' Ir ET %JCF 5E35=R A4P1N (IN.ICE.N"pl)- O RE[E ENCASEMENT •� \_TMUST TANG FOR CLEANING EQUIPMENT Standard Plate Library City of Monticello RUM RIVER LAND SURVEYORS & ENGIlNM S PO Box 1044 Telephone: (763) 389-4476 Princeton, MN 55371 Fax: (763) 631-0376 43'B.NG Title; Typical Service Connection Dat*` 03-05 r&1nd:'03-15 P1Tate Iia. 3004 SPIRIT HILLS SOUTH 91JIL9W4 INSTALLEC BY =RIVATE CONTRACT —7WER 'FAIRE LOCATE BOX h BUND LINE I J J J COPPEIB-CLAD STEEL AWO 12 G"E TRACER WRE 39 MIL HI➢H DENSM POLYETHYLENE 4REEN COLOREC ,I"ET TO BE PROADED UNDER PF4VATE CONTRACTJ INBTAI=D AS PER CITY CZN-RACT L� NIII�TRACFR WOE 3PLICF CURB SON STANDPIPE P' SPOOL COPPER -CLAD STEEL AWG 12 J +3ALME TRACER WRE 30 }AIL 1H10H DENSITY PCLTETWLENE tMIZN COLORED 04XFT 79 BE PR3NDE UNDER CITY 0 ORACT I" COPPER WATEF# A% COPPER -CLAD STEEL AWA 12 CAU# TRACER WRE 30 }AIL HIDH DENSITY PCL'PFTH"F GRFFN COI-CRFI) JACKF7 TC FSE PROM= UNDER CITY CZCFLICT N SANITARY SERVICE NLINE SANITARY SEWER r1 Tracer Wire Standard Plan Library (New Developments) City of Monticello ute: 03-08 PlTate No. .� ""s"03-15 3005 SHEET DETAILS 6 CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA37 SHEETS P-4367.01 STEEL T -ME FENCE PAST PAINTED Df4EEN WM I AN OIL BASED PAINT AND A MINIMUM Z' REFLEATCRIYED TAPE �E]dGINEERF�vAG�E AT THE PDP OF THE PP +SSii TDI MARK 77HHE SERVICE STUB M BE INSTALLED AT THE TIME GF TiMZE INSTALLATION {INCIDENTAL,) 4' OR 6" PVC . S SEE ,1CINT DETAIL BELOW MIN PLACE NEARLY HDROONTAL FOR LOW 1 EASEMEMiB AHC SHALLOW SEINER AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER TYPICAL SERXE WHpE CSER 0VER TOP OF SEWER IS 12 OR LESS NOTES; PVC - POLY -MM CHLORIDE 'IDR 26 DEPTH OF CCVER OVER TOP OF PIPE TO $LIT ALL 9ERYICE CCNNEGi14Nd INCLUDINO NECEd'SARY FIELD OOFMDITFOARB SENDS AND SPECIAL FTTTINOS SHALL BE PAID FOR AT THE SDNTRACT UNIT PRICE DID PER LINEAR FOOT OF 4" OR 8 . NO ADDITICNAL CZWPENEAT404 814ALL BE ALLOWED FCR CGSNORM FN04ENPIt AR PIPE t't MING• �r CSI ENCASEMENT B. AKIN 4" OR B" PVC i DF'RA1N1 AND WnWTi' EASEMENT r' 0. `411�7 ELEV TO BE SET BY THE ENGINEER - CONTRAMM TO VERIFY P1dOR 70 BURY PIPE 'SHALL BE t LETELY ENTRENCHED AND SMALL NAME CLASS 'S' SEMOING YMERE DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER SEE DETAIL BELOW FOR G4DUCNG 13ETWEEN DISSIMILAR PIPES ADAPTOR TO BE RESILIENT 1 'TOP OF OF S EREI S12 OR�MORE OVER ASTM C4" -Ai T17E nl OR APPROVED FAUAL FOR DISSiM1LAR PIPES CCNDRETE U40ASEMENT 3F � PUC WE F— I/CF TO PIC FEiNCO ENCASED IN i cONC11=7E 81 -ALL BE NECUIREC ;: ;?' ,'';?•�; WHEN CONNECTI YG TO EXISTING ' Ir ET %JCF 5E35=R A4P1N (IN.ICE.N"pl)- O RE[E ENCASEMENT •� \_TMUST TANG FOR CLEANING EQUIPMENT Standard Plate Library City of Monticello RUM RIVER LAND SURVEYORS & ENGIlNM S PO Box 1044 Telephone: (763) 389-4476 Princeton, MN 55371 Fax: (763) 631-0376 43'B.NG Title; Typical Service Connection Dat*` 03-05 r&1nd:'03-15 P1Tate Iia. 3004 SPIRIT HILLS SOUTH 91JIL9W4 INSTALLEC BY =RIVATE CONTRACT —7WER 'FAIRE LOCATE BOX h BUND LINE I J J J COPPEIB-CLAD STEEL AWO 12 G"E TRACER WRE 39 MIL HI➢H DENSM POLYETHYLENE 4REEN COLOREC ,I"ET TO BE PROADED UNDER PF4VATE CONTRACTJ INBTAI=D AS PER CITY CZN-RACT L� NIII�TRACFR WOE 3PLICF CURB SON STANDPIPE P' SPOOL COPPER -CLAD STEEL AWG 12 J +3ALME TRACER WRE 30 }AIL 1H10H DENSITY PCLTETWLENE tMIZN COLORED 04XFT 79 BE PR3NDE UNDER CITY 0 ORACT I" COPPER WATEF# A% COPPER -CLAD STEEL AWA 12 CAU# TRACER WRE 30 }AIL HIDH DENSITY PCL'PFTH"F GRFFN COI-CRFI) JACKF7 TC FSE PROM= UNDER CITY CZCFLICT N SANITARY SERVICE NLINE SANITARY SEWER r1 Tracer Wire Standard Plan Library (New Developments) City of Monticello ute: 03-08 PlTate No. .� ""s"03-15 3005 SHEET DETAILS 6 CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA37 SHEETS P-4367.01 1 J Q LIJ O Z Q n z n, III LLJ z CDz cV O O l t DATE rn nI o� (V W �a o ry L n n_,- < 8" POURED CONCRETE BASE, FOR ALTERNATE PRECAST CONCRETE BASE. SEE MnDOT STANDARD PLATE 4011 (MODIFY DIAMETER AND 2" RAISED AREA TO FIT REQUIRED DIAMETER. REFER TO STANDARD PLANS FOR HEIGHT AND DIAMETER REQUIRED. MANHOLE STEPS SHALL BE CAST IRON OR MA MODEL PS -I -PF (BY MA INDUSTRIAL INC.) CONFORMING TO ALL OSHA REGULATIONS AND SPACED 16" OC. MINIMUM STEEL REINFORCEMENT EQUIVALENT STEEL AREA IN WIRE MESH MAY BE USED GENERAL DIMENSIONS FOR CONCRETE APPLY TO BRICK AND CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT CONSTRUCTION ALSO, EXCEPT AS NOTED. 12" MINIMUM FOR PRECAST, 3 BRICKS OR 1 BLOCK MINIMUM FOR MASONRY CONSTUCTION REINFORCEMENT AS PER MnDOT SPEC 3301, GRADE 60. Standard Prate Library City of Monticello p VI� 14�1.^­ Fro Ja0- CD < O r� �zc'a z �a� v Cf z~ 0 ¢ aJ MANHOLE MANHOLE,-'. OR PLASTERED OR CATCH EXTERIOR CATCH .r BASIN BASIN DIA SEWER BRICK (MnDOT SPEC 3616) BLOCK MASONRY CONSTRUCTION — Title: Standard Manhole for Storm Sewer Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised' 4-001 '03-17 )°C�C (- N I1 a- ~ C CASTING ADJUSTING RINGS 4" MIN - 12" MAX STANDARD FRAME & COVER W INSTALL INFRA SHIELD (OR APPROVED EQUAL) EXTERNAL CHIMNEY SEAL I W IY O W I� r ROADWAY SURFACE ! nMrnnIolnloaornvCov(oaov =�I SEE MnDOT STANDARD PLATE 4020 __j g 1� FOR COVER REQUIREMENTS q I- f — WALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE CLASS II -r PRECAST PIPE, EXCEPT 48" DIA MAY BE O o Z. a 0 ASTM C 478 CONCRETE PIPE. SEE MnDOT STANDARD z y z ~ 8" CAST -IN-PLACE PLATE 3000 (NO TONGUE OR GROOVE AT TOP G. 0 LO © CONCRETE OR BOTTOM OF THIS SECTION). CAST --IN-PLACE 0 0 1* o- ~ iv 4' TO 10' CONCRETE OR MASONRY CONSTRUCTION (BRICK OR BLOCK) ALLOWED ONLY IF APPROVED Y N Z (n 9: BY ENGINEER 00 J0 Fn M U _, �- CONCRETE DOGHOUSE REQUIRED ON a gr N OUTSIDE AND INSIDE OF STRUCTURE vxzz 0 U � AND PIPE CONNECTION O U U Ld O W wW 2 Lo Y as IR } U_ ¢ Cn N p a m Om N� M O J 1I 0)� Z = C STRUCTURE - 00 8" POURED CONCRETE BASE, FOR ALTERNATE PRECAST CONCRETE BASE. SEE MnDOT STANDARD PLATE 4011 (MODIFY DIAMETER AND 2" RAISED AREA TO FIT REQUIRED DIAMETER. REFER TO STANDARD PLANS FOR HEIGHT AND DIAMETER REQUIRED. MANHOLE STEPS SHALL BE CAST IRON OR MA MODEL PS -I -PF (BY MA INDUSTRIAL INC.) CONFORMING TO ALL OSHA REGULATIONS AND SPACED 16" OC. MINIMUM STEEL REINFORCEMENT EQUIVALENT STEEL AREA IN WIRE MESH MAY BE USED GENERAL DIMENSIONS FOR CONCRETE APPLY TO BRICK AND CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT CONSTRUCTION ALSO, EXCEPT AS NOTED. 12" MINIMUM FOR PRECAST, 3 BRICKS OR 1 BLOCK MINIMUM FOR MASONRY CONSTUCTION REINFORCEMENT AS PER MnDOT SPEC 3301, GRADE 60. Standard Prate Library City of Monticello p VI� 14�1.^­ Fro Ja0- CD < O r� �zc'a z �a� v Cf z~ 0 ¢ aJ MANHOLE MANHOLE,-'. OR PLASTERED OR CATCH EXTERIOR CATCH .r BASIN BASIN DIA SEWER BRICK (MnDOT SPEC 3616) BLOCK MASONRY CONSTRUCTION — Title: Standard Manhole for Storm Sewer Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised' 4-001 '03-17 )°C�C (- N I1 a- ~ INSTALL INFRA SHIELD SHOWN ON THE PLANS HAVE BEEN (OR APPROVED EQUAL) i DEPRESSED 0.10' BELOW GUTTER W 9 m b` I W IY O W I� nMrnnIolnloaornvCov(oaov N M __j g 1� g" q W 'V) z NNM o Z. a 0 f0 °D O Mtn Q I oo a 0 LO '\ Q v W it v Z (n 9: U II Z _, U53 gr N CN> _ H 0 U � Q U O U U Ld O W wW O H Q as IR U< w N p ~� Om N� M O J 1I 0)� Z = > z OU 00 w1l a K w n O ���0)Om00 N MMIn D rn Zam j W� LU oz 8 _r, W =spa INSTALL INFRA SHIELD SHOWN ON THE PLANS HAVE BEEN (OR APPROVED EQUAL) i DEPRESSED 0.10' BELOW GUTTER EXTERNAL CHIMNEY SEAL ELEVATION (SEE DETAIL 5003) nMrnnIolnloaornvCov(oaov 0) 0) N Qq 0! N 4q qNd' g" q .-a F r Wa ? � NNM 71n f0 °D O Mtn OONNMM M M't ' �U � 0OUa U II 0 U � — O H Q as IR N0 N<0 m COR mNm Om V Lb N W 0_ M O Y,n 1I 0)� MIS t0� �N NM 0"!MN n't 00 w1l a K U n O ���0)Om00 N MMIn (01,1,0) rn Zam j W� U �N H M I� N C0 10 � a (0 N17 tp O. 0 M MtU N I`1 O M ' N Q �:3--NNM) In OD 00 d'I. N N � II g O — U 0 =a a �<ON m rnOa_�1000R YO)t0 - O' ] a H� >-,q qtR 0!n CAN I.IO LIJ wa pF aNn O -*owm W M w an NN ISN NMMd'In . I, CCI 1 U K O =o �gWa� V co K) CD V M 7 In OD d' 0) In N Ie Om - ^ -m O)m N� -�N(V 4,06 00 Oi �I°i In NN II C0 o n n 0 M K)I`1 m N - 0) LL1 a Fr Ua IL N N M In In In 1l m x aga Q!RRgo)MOlonoao00701n O Lo W d aNNM�Lnw m� M LOCA MI- - OIC p U �.-.-.-NNM�� Q d O o a ZNInO� .-NNN QIP I O<0 N 00� MM �Ln OfON t0 tD 1�m V O W N W z _ Ld v N Z (A 3 as a (if� o_ a �w 2z Nw z a ww �m w � J w3: of I- 0 z Standard Plate Library Riprap Detail City of Monticello Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised: 4009i 0.5)-15 REVISION A O A L=D=_1 35 1/4 ' 43" CURB INLET FRAME AND CURB BOX = /% NEENAH NO. R -3067-V u PLAN 4" CONCRETE COLLAR ALL STORM SEWER CASTING ELEVATIONS INSTALL INFRA SHIELD SHOWN ON THE PLANS HAVE BEEN (OR APPROVED EQUAL) i DEPRESSED 0.10' BELOW GUTTER EXTERNAL CHIMNEY SEAL ELEVATION (SEE DETAIL 5003) d25 0) 0) N Qq 0! N 4q qNd' g" q 0 N r Wa ? � N V tG 00 -MIL) 00 N M M M't > � 0OUa Z N u s Ln 0 U D- O (n CL am NC O (0a le mf04 m 00 Nwa OMO1M n O ���0)Om00 N MMIn (01,1,0) rn Zam U �N y_ J Hj W O W Z J YNIn �<ON m rnOa_�1000R YO)t0 - O' ] a O N M '1M W W � �NNNM LIJ O N II U O =o o a �� O)m N� m 1�0)O)N m7 q (n W d a�t0'0 n 0 M K)I`1 m N N O)M 0) LL1 a Fr U N N M In In In 1l m x O M of H W Y aD O) In m M O) t0 N m 0 t0 <O,N O - ^ QZl~Ji (Oj�N.l In tO OD O)�cONNN0 � -o Q N II oM a- D_'o a o ina� � aa, 7 O R In m M'tIn O M M't r W O- am OM)(5 m �M f00)MNM�O)� ~Q I ¢ jd ZN000 N Oza M ro )n MODNIn N O r m 0 N007 N M In N W z _ Ld v N Z (A 3 as a (if� o_ a �w 2z Nw z a ww �m w � J w3: of I- 0 z Standard Plate Library Riprap Detail City of Monticello Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised: 4009i 0.5)-15 REVISION A O A L=D=_1 35 1/4 ' 43" CURB INLET FRAME AND CURB BOX = /% NEENAH NO. R -3067-V u PLAN 4" CONCRETE COLLAR ALL STORM SEWER CASTING ELEVATIONS INSTALL INFRA SHIELD SHOWN ON THE PLANS HAVE BEEN (OR APPROVED EQUAL) i DEPRESSED 0.10' BELOW GUTTER EXTERNAL CHIMNEY SEAL ELEVATION (SEE DETAIL 5003) ADJUSTING RINGS 4" MIN - 12" MAX ENCASE IN CONCRETE g" COLLAR USE CONCRETE I CURB MIX FOR COLLAR , 24" FINISH GRADE 31" 2" �- -� 3 - 6 _ / 5" 4" MIN.-/;' �--. 34" I• 4" MIN.- ��. _ 4" CONCRETE COLLAR NOTES: SECTION A -A POUR A 3" TO 4" CONCRETE COLLAR AROUND RINGS EXTENDING FROM THE CASTING TO THE PRECAST SECTION CATCH BASINS LOCATED IN DRIVEWAYS SHALL BE TYPE MnDOT DESIGN H. THE CASTING SHALL BE NEENAH R -3508-A2. R NV Standard Plate Library City of Monticello 12' OR 14' 6"�{ F� M� 4.00% I I 1 4" TOPSOIL, SEED, J/ AND MULCH OR SOD 1D 4 Title:: Standard Catch Basin Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised: 03-17 4OO2 60' rL I 30', 32' OR 36' (FACE 'TO FACE) MODIFIED DESIGN D CURB & GUTTER 2.00% 2.00% R /W VARIES SLO 4.00% A'1 (TYPICAL) 2' 1 1/2 "TYPE 2360 BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE - TACK COAT MNDOT 2357 — 2" TYPE 2360 BITUMINOUS NON -WEARING COURSE 6" CLASS V GRAVEL (MODIFIED) 12" TO 24" SELECT GRANULAR BORROW (2'- 6" BEHIND CURB) �2 6" MINIMUM SCARIFY AND COMPACT SUBGRADE TYPICAL SECTION URBAN RESIDENTIAL 1D 2 ROLLS OF SOD TO BE PLACED BEHIND CURB AND SIDEWALK/TRAIL. 2Q THE USE AND THICKNESS OF SELECT GRANULAR BORROW IS BASED ON EXISTING SOIL CONDITIONS 14S DETERMINED BY THE CITY ENGINEER. Q3 STREET WIDTH TO BE DETERMINED BY THE CITY ENGINEER. ® 15" PERFORATED P.E. PIPE WITH FABRIC. INSTALL WHERE CLAY SOILS ARE ENCOUNTERED IN THE ROADWAY SUBGRADE OR AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. SEE PLATE 4006 FOR DETAILS Title: Standard Prate Library Typical Street Residential (Minor) City of Monticello' Date: 03_05 Plate No. Revised: 5002 03-17 I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was DESIGNED BY: prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I CJJ am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State Minn ota. DRAWN BY: MSS CHECKED BY: �C_ Al J. JOCHUM, P.E. Date 4/8/19 Li C. No. 23461 TAE PLAN CASTING TO BE SET 0.10' BELOW GUTTER ELEVATION INSTALL INFRA SHIELD CURB INLET FRAME AND CURB BOX (OR APPROVED EQUAL) STANDARD CASTING - NEENAH R -3067-V EXTERNAL CHIMNEY SEAL ADJUSTING RINGS 4" MIN - 12" MAX ENCASE WITH CONCRETE /r MANHOLE COVER TO BE 48" DIA COLLAR 6" / OPE CRETEX TYPE II WITH 24"x 36" I *15" 1 24" 1 9" CONCRETE DOGHOUSE REQUIRED ON OUTSIDE AND INSIDE OF STRUCTURE w x *48"(TYP) .AND PIPE CONNECTION > *DIMENSION VARIES O BASED ON STRUCTURE DIAMETER \1 -- I RCP PIPE ,( I r (ll CONCRETE CATCH BASIN MANHOLE J NOTES: AND BASE TO BE CIRETEX TYPE 4338 OR APPROVED EQUAL 1. BASE TO BE GROUTED TO FORM A SMOOTH INVERT TO OUTLET. SECTION 2. PIPE CUT-OUTS TO BE LOCATED WHERE REQUIRED. CATCH BASIN MANHOLES REQUIRED IN GREEN SPACES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF PRECAST CONCRETE ONLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH Mn/DOT STANDARD PLATE 4006L. THE CASTING SHALL BE NEENAH R-4342. CATCH BASIN MANHOLES LOCATED IN DRIVEWAYS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH AN ECCENTRIC TOP SLAB WITH A 27" ROUND OPENING. THE CASTING SHALL BE NEENAH R -3508-A2. Title: Standard Prate Library City of Monticello Catch Basin Manhole _ Date: 015-05 Plate No. Revised: 0 -, 4003 12" 3/4 PER FT 3" 1/2 R 1/2 R _ 3" 3:1 7" �2� MODIFIED DESIGN "D" 7Yp1�L MATCH MODIFIED DESIGN "D" CURB & GUTTER (TYPICAL) B61 NOTE: STORM SEWER TOP OF CASTING ELEVATION SHOWN ON THE PLANS INCLUDES A 0.10' DEPRESSION FROM THE PROPOSED GUTTER GRADE. THE CONCRETE CURB SHOULD BE TRANSITIONED FROM THE PROPOSED GUTTER GRADE TO THE CASTING ELEVATION 5 FEET ON EACH SIDE OF THE CENTER OF THE CASTING. Standard Plate Library City of Monticello �— RUM RINER LAND SURVEYORS &ENGINEERS PO Box 1044 Telephone: (763) 389-4476 Princeton, MN 55371 Fax: (763) 631-0376 Title: Concrete Curb & Gutter at Catch Basin Date: 03-05 I Plate NO. Revised: 5004 03-15 SPIRIT HILLS SOUTH TRANSVERSE & LONGITUDINAL BARS 5/8 FOR 18" TO 27" APRONS 3/4 FOR 30" & LARGER APRONS. 6" MAX 6" ANCHOR TOP & BOTH ENDS NOTE: 1. ALL TRASH GUARDS SHALL BE GALVANIZED AFTER FABRICATION PER MNDOT SPEC. 3392 & 3394. 2. APPLIES TO FLARED END SECTIONS 12" OR LARGER. 3. ALL NUTS AND BOLT ATTACHING TRASH GUARD TO THE FLARED END SECTION SHALL BE LEFT' EXPOSED Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Title: Trash Guard for End Section Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised: 03-15 4007 SAME SLOPE AS ROADWAY HORIZONTAL _ (FORMS MAY BE TILTED) REVERSE SLOPE GUTTER SECTION DIVIDER PLATE 3"R 1 0 1/2 " 3"R 3 SLOPE 0.06 FT/FT 6" 13 1/2 " C SLOPE OR 6. 2" MIN I'2" 7"TII{// Y �2 / 0 I`Z" HORIZONTAL / LINE MNDOT SLOPE 0.06 FT/FT NORMAL, UNLESS STANDARD PLATE NO. 7100 H OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. IF A DIFFERENT SPECIFICATION REFERENCE 2531 GUTMAYTER BE TLOPE TED IS PERMITTED, THE FORM CONCRETE - 8612 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER CONCRETE - 21.1 Fr U CU. DS. LIN 861ZB612) DIVIDER PLATE 3"R 1 1/2 " 3"R 3� 6" 13 1/2 " O SLOPE 0.06 FT/FT SLOPE OR 1 2" MIN 2" 7" / 8 HORIZONTAL LINE MNDOT © SLOPE 0.06 FT/FT NORMAL, UNLESS STANDARD PLATE NO. 7100 H OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. IF A DIFFERENT SPECIFICATION REFERENCE 2531 GUTTER SLOPE IS PERMITTED, THE FORM CONCRETE - 0.0582 CU YDS / LIN FT (6618) MAY BE TILTED B618 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER CONCRETE - 17.2 FT / CU.YDS. (II 12- 3/4 " / PER FT 3" 1/2 " R 1/2 R 3" 3:1 7" 10" HORIZONTAL - - - - - - LINE - L 2'- 0" MODIFIED DESIGN "D" CURB & GUTTER Title: Standard Plate Library Concrete Curb & Gutter for Streets City of Monticello Date; 03-05 Plate No. 5005 Fr - Revised: 03-15 SHEET DETAILS 7 CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA 37 SHEETS P-4367.01 0 CONTRACTION JOINTS 1' 8' CRD9d S .M p '•. • �. o. •'•. �' i'" .�.. .:: i' ��••�°�• '�• Via••' �}'. Iso , ir1�1,2• • +;,.,� r }y�. y ii,!•. 12" GRANULAR BORROW OR $I CLASS 5 - 4" OR $" CONCRETE WALK BOULEVARD WIDTH VARIES(AVEIRAGE B') SIDEWALK DIMENSIONS WII)TH - 5' DEPTH - Bm FOR NEW DEVELOPMENTS - *4" MINIMUM FOR EXISTING AREAS. S" AT DRIVEWAYS AND CROSSWALKS GRANULAR SORROW DEPTH - 12B GRANVLAR BORROW OR B" CLASS 5 CONTRACTION JOINTS - B' INTERVALS EXPANSION JOINTS - BO' INTERVALS (APPROX.) "MATCH EXISTING DEPTH. 4" MINIMUM INSTALL PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMPS AT ROADWAY INTERSECTIONS ' nft Typical Sidewalk City Library City of Monticello I Date; 03-05 Plate N*, 'e'0*3-17 0 12 ,f "RFLiOW$LOT IN SHROUD OVERFLOW IL07 IN SHROUD Standard. Plate Library City of !Monticello REVISION A q. YANG NUT ATTACHMENT HOOD SILT F.AERI0SLEEVE PER MnDAT SPECIAL PROVISION Hat SILT FABRIO SLEVE PER MnDOT SPRIAL PROVISION $888 ,ntl*: Inlet Protection Orate Inlet Cover Dice:O —O7 I Plate No. Revl�le�; 03-156 00 5 BITUMINOUS TRAIL DESIGN I — PATHWAY WIDTH 10 ft — SHOULDER WIDTH 1 fit MIN. 1 10 1 31 SP 9.5 WEARM COURSE MN'TL;m 1La) 3' OL 6 AWREGATE BASE ;}, WIFIED) 19" SELECT GRANULAR SORROW S' MINIMUM SCARIFY AND RE COEFAV SUB DE PREP) FASMIC IF DIRECTED BY E"NFM MOTES: 1. TRAIL WNSTIRUDTION SHALL. BE WITH THE }AOS. REWIT EDITION OF THE 017Y DF UN710ELL-0 GENERAL SPEMDATTANS AND STANCLARD DErAIL PLATES. 2. PEDESTRIAN RAMPS SH&L EE 0AgB114SJG1iED 'PATH TRUNCATED COMM AND -CONFD.AM 70 AAA RMW1RF-MTS, 3, MODIFY SURFACIN0, BABE, AND VAWkOE )ESION BLED ON iXRS TED �,EHICULAR USE AND "MACE WILE. Standard Plate Library City of Monticello 3' To 6' Title: Typical Trail Section Date: 03-05 plot* »o. s�.03— 5013 , - Emergency spillways crest �B PT Anti seepage collar (typ,) TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION BASIN WITH OUTLET PIPE Emargancy spTllwcy crest Perforated -at Standpipe ti _ pipe Ant! Seepage collar (typ,) 1 TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION BASIN WITH STAND PIPE OUTLET Ernargancy spillway V 1 ■ D • 1 ., . Perforate etandpips z3f Y L 4a Y 441 3/4" ruck coria T *14 1/3 zT .,, D hales spaced 8" to 10" on center NOTE• D = dlarrieter of standpipe equal to diameter of plpe. • Pipe r'rinterial must be rigid STAND PIPE [DETAIL Title: T"emporare irnent Stan�dar�d Plate Library basin i f Mon i lI Date; 03-07 Plate No. Ravilmd., 00 03-15 I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was DESIGNED BY: prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I CJJ am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State nn ota. i DRAWN BY: MSS ��C`Al CHECKED BY: J. JOCHUM, P.E. Date 4/8/19Lic. No. 23461 TAE SPECIAL HOTE: SPECIAL ATTENTION SHALL BE PAID WHEN INSTALLING DRIVEWAYS TO NOT UNDERMINE OR DANAG€ EXISTING SI DEVVALI<S. I 3" OF 1-1/2- 2" ROCK SB CRUSHED CONCRETE"OR I APPROVED EQUIVXtNT / I TAPER l DEPTH AND WIDTH IN 10' S IDENALK Standard Plate Library City of !Monticello CURB +fit GUTTER I I � -Y OF 1-1/2" ROCK OR $" CRUSHED CONCRETE Title: Residential Gravel Construction Entrance Dlrtel: 03-05 Plate No, 03-15 6001 POINT—, ,3. - STAKE STRAW OR 'II FIBER J a• TD 7" DIA. ROLL E4CI-390 IN PLASTIC CR POLYES7ER NETTI413 TYPE 21 BIOPOLL CATCH CHECK USE CN R GUOI GRADED AREAS 1" X 2" X 18' LONG WOODEN STAKES A- 1' O' SPACING LMAXINJM. STARES 314AL- BE 7RA/M THROUGH THE BACK HALF OF THE 01 --DROLL AT AN ANGLE OF 43 CEOREES 'WITH TIE TOP OF -HE STAKE POINTING UPSTREAV PROYIOE B. -0 10' 0= EN3E31IENT DEPTH. =Ln'� I�� :INT� A „ L'1 I' _B' EIBEOMENT DE3TH 8IGROLL STAKING DETAI- NOTE, WHEN MORE THAN 1 8ICRaLL'CWPI Laa I1S WEt7EI), OVERLAP ENDS A MINIMUM CF S• .AND STAKE Standard Plate Library City of Monticello RUM RIVER LAND SURVEYORS & ENGIlNM S PO Box 1044 Telephone: (763) 389-4476 Princeton, MN 55371 Fax: (763) 631-0376 ENTRENCH A MINIMUM ff E' Titl>r: Bio Log Staling Straw or Wood Pio Roll Date. 03-08P Na. Il Med'03-15 600 �. SPIRIT HILLS SOUTH EXISTING CURB ELI 'AIMCD ROAD DRAIN CC -23r' HIGH -LC-'R INLET PROTECTON CL1R3 AND GJTT--R MODEL CDR CITY APPROVED EQUAL. OVERFLOW IS ;j Q= THE CURB BOX HEIGA- 7EFLEC70A ")LATE cF FOR THE 4E„ R -3239—V3 STANDARD CASTING, INSTALL 'r'IMCC RCA] DRAIN CG—,3280 OR CITY .APPROVEG ECLAL. Standard Plate Library City of !Monticello r Title: Inlet Protection Catch Basin Insert Q1xte; 03-07 Pete No. O— 6004 15 t .Y -1,8IJ X11 it '1 If 3T5kNI&EKIS3.M. L't 4TOLESPEASCO)a 4;1 iL9P®i y.' SAFE G*4 >i a.Ta ITAFLESISEKSI.V. H �-1 PL'.S'vY CNF3I tl14 S BXpRLlYi v •• r a a••• r c a r •• a Y�Y�IV�MYhIV�MY�aS•l�{' ,�� �VA�i�'.�`�.'1�1� }�}�'('•}'{h�' �, PRi�41RlIFCULIPCI{Z 1hSTA.LLiAL IlLWIl9ETE. PIDL�DihIDAnPyCLL31414Y PPPLIQATJCf! �• uLa PGCnLE!!l,Al� cera L. 5145..7 THE TaP OF TO I!LPN BY' Afli9IL'91IN9 THE LLAwET IN A 11' i1w CLLP % 3' 71.1lIA1 i':01 7;1H sMTHVPV4NN1LTnLY 124ti "Ln JIL? qN= UnhoO i JPdLCPL PGRTICrI DP THETW4W. ANCHOR THE 1611AY.irkwkAIII 'If LTAPLVdLr.4mAPPRCXWTLLYit, iuw }API,rINTHEL:Tra,'•dOFTHEmraw. dAGIFL L AM WNPAGr THE TfflN1>4.AFTER1 SWL NO. >AIIII 38W -75 WARAr1TE6=11., 1: FMD PEEAAIAM 1P ?M=4 00ralOF" IMT NMltCMP 40aWloil3ldPAiJ 6:11.ISM ESLA fPvlMS7CAPI3TEDW1LwrrmAWIN VF SUPI. 047.aAIN AII0 APPII.4&7 LY Ir OWN APART VAM-XE-,VUn1 CP TFi ELAWITT. 9. k:,U7ME ELSflRETStI*iCCY,'X{�A 1r! J FIL'i1 7roTr1LL'lADRv$E TIT! iLt3FE, ELAI,Y.ETi45iL JP.NGLLbYTTX APFACFKWTEI E Add!NLr Ili LCL LLIAFAC9. PLL ILA rVM NAT 1111SEW MLY FAIrl PAD Til EAIL&MRAGL EY PI XG LTJ,PL 1"T4432 IN 0"994'1 WDAT.Ip 6-'11 NDW p IN TAI STAP19 PA77M sally€. b" H JINN 9'GN AL DOTi+STPIA, WARANTNSEE 1II91aLDEEPLArM7II E4110P71101=19EGOMMMMPONDIA13TO748APPRWRIATEETAPLEOV,71M. 4. TH E C DL EL SIF P+1lALLEL X81, W" DUET BE 9T.m.PL ED PITH APPAp1Jr IATEL•, T.D' �Wa-lk.;pn; OVEIII npahDl4 CT! ELATIXErTfPE. Ti! EA911r&E PROEM SEAw PLISN 6I=PIT, PuAZ THE EDOE XTME 17,,E RLAPPri1G fiLAr�l!ET 4L4N RET B --M IWALM ON 77Pj LVLN °„TTM THE-2MORM L l.S.r,' ISrIT2!1 V-. THL PRINIOUW1 I MEr7LLID L LFT11ir. E CDHL E9 JTrrs ILaRATL W.ICLD C Ci 4I Tw MlPP Wr N PL:,CDD Ola a'NMR ENO !7l#Y” &-- 'W WTH AN APPMX kAATE VA 4LAF. LT APL E THII H AV:"PE D MEA, rPPWMINI47ELY r2• INW} APARTAOMS ENT RE BL.}raHlr�,^nrrm, nm� 9M L=L ND1L = 1: "101411. -10 YBL OF STAPLE CR,11 I LEIOTH1i i1?IATLRTHPA 9"{'MO r,%Ir 0 HLCHSAW TD PrlDPCRLX3GWRC'.R3G DVANPTS Title: Erosion Control Blanket Standard Plate Libnary Stapling Patterns & Installation it'�Moniicello Dote:,—$ Plats No. Rsvl■ed:03-1 5 X01 SHEET DETAILS g CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA 37 SHEETS P-4367.01 z Q rr Z Q J 0 z ry w w z Ew a� �o 6V I � 0 nI o N W 00a n, 0 �n Q GENERAL CONSTRUCTION AND SOILS NOTES: 1. STRIP AND REUSE ALL INPLACE TOPSOIL IN AREAS TO BE DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION. 2. STREET AND LOT FILL SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH ENGINEERED FILL. ALL EXCAVATION, SOIL CORRECTIONS AND FILL SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. ENGINEERED FILL FOR THIS PROJECT IS DEFINED IN THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT. 3. SAWCUT AND MILL WHEN PLACING NEW PAVEMENT ADJACENT TO INPLACE PAVEMENT AND AT TERMINI OF CONSTRUCTION TO ENSURE A UNIFORM JOINT. 4. BITUMINOUS, CONCRETE AND ALL OTHER REMOVAL ITEMS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH MN/DOT SPEC. 2104. 5. USE TACK COAT BETWEEN ALL BITUMINOUS MIXTURES. THE BITUMINOUS TACK COAT MATERIAL SHALL BE APPLIED AT A UNIFORM RATE OF 0.05 GAL/SY TO 0.07 GAL/SY BETWEEN BITUMINOUS LAYERS. THE APPLICATION RATES ARE FOR UNDILUTED EMULSIONS. TACK COAT SHALL BE INCIDENTAL. 6. PERFORMANCE GRADED (PG) ASPHALT BINDER PG 58S-28, SPEC 3151, SHALL BE USED FOR ALL BITUMINOUS MIXES ON THE PROJECT. SPECIFIC PG GRADES ARE SHOWN AT THE END OF THE MIX DESIGNATION NUMBER SHOWN ON THE TYPICAL SECTION. 7. THE BITUMINOUS MIXTURES SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF SPECIFICATIONS 2360 AND 3139. 8. IF NECESSARY, THE UTILITY COMPANIES WILL RELOCATE THEIR FACILITIES CONCURRENTLY WITH THE CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS. CONTRACTOR SHALL SCHEDULE CONSTRUCTION IN COOPERATION WITH UTILITY RELOCATION. 9. EROSION CONTROL SHALL CONFORM TO THE MN/DOT EROSION CONTROL HANDBOOK. 10. ALL STORM SEWER SHALL BE REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE. 11. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL POST THE SWPPP AND OTHER REQUIRED DOCUMENTS ON SITE. THE METHOD OF POSTING SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. 12. ALL LABOR, MATERIAL, EQUIPMENT AND WORK REQUIRED TO PROTECT THE CONCRETE CURB AGAINST COLD WEATHER SHALL BE INCIDENTAL. 13. ALL DISTURBED AREAS, SHALL BE RESTORED PER THE CITY STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. 14. THE FINAL GRADES SHOWN ASSUME A 20 PERCENT SOIL COMPACTION FACTOR ON THE TOTAL FILL. IF ACTUAL COMPACTION FACTOR IS GREATER THAN OR LESS THAN 20 PERCENT, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL WORK WITH THE ENGINEER DURING THE GRADING OPERATION TO ADJUST THE FINAL GRADES AS NECESSARY TO BALANCE THE EARTHWORK. ADJUSTMENT TO FUTURE LOT GRADES AND STREETS WILL BE MADE AS NECESSARY. 15. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL STRIP AND TEMPORARILY STOCKPILE ALL EXISTING TOPSOIL FOR REUSE. SALVAGING TOPSOIL IS INCLUDED AS COMMON EXCAVATION. PLACING 6 INCHES OF SALVAGED TOPSOIL OVER THE DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE INCIDENTAL. IF MORE THAN 6 INCHES OF TOPSOIL IS ONSITE THIS MATERIAL SHALL BE USED AS FILL OUTSIDE THE RIGHT OF WAY AND BUILDING PAD AREAS. 16. ALL TEMPORARY SOIL STABILIZATION AND SEEDING NECESSARY TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE PROJECT MANUAL, MPCA NPDES CONSTRUCTION PERMIT AND MN/DOT STANDARD SPECIFICATION SHALL BE INCIDENTAL. 17. PRIOR TO PAVING THE WEARING COURSE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ADJUST THE MANHOLE CASTINGS AND VALVE BOXES TO THE FINISHED HEIGHT OF THE WEARING COURSE, ADJUSTMENT OF THE CASTINGS SHALL BE WITH CONCRETE RINGS. VALVE BOXES SHALL BE ADJUSTED WITH THE SCREW ADJUSTMENT. ALL WORK REQUIRED FOR CASTINGS AND VALVE BOX ADJUSTMENTS SHALL BE INCIDENTAL. 18. EXTRA DEPTH WATERMAIN IS REQUIRED AS INDICATED ON THE PLANS. THIS WORK SHALL BE INCIDENTAL. 19. THE BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE SHALL NOT BE PLACED UNTIL THE YEAR 2020. DATE REVISION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State Minn ota. i C AI J. ;JOCHUM, P.E. Date 4/8/19 Lic. No. 23461 r� 41 LG4MMM 0R5MXS3 ANO REMM MAMMY LTIL TY EASEMEKT P/L11,_1 S, 13' t-4 L07 sT��- � $1L'BLREEr TYPICAL TYPICAL "7— 3rmxrruu anre - 1 Ali, ar An I't 01 iE'ff_6 ItMLL r y'yIL� EABE.hAEkT INS7AI.I.ALIflN ➢RNK�AE ilrLlTy SEWER AND WATER STUBBED EASEMENT LINE 11' INSIDE PPk23PE19TY LIRE TELEPHONE, TV OR FI13ER 1 ELEPHOINE, TV CR neER PEOEBTAL h P FRFsETA - o d CENTERLINE 114 THE EVENT OF A HMRANT 7R31ffi ,21wr TRENCH A7 A PROPERTY �CZANER, MOVE E DETAILt�]AMM ELED, TRANS, AND PECES7PL8 SAOR ' TD MAINTAIN 10, OLEeN SPACE RRBMT nF ;Mn- TRANq PROPERTY LINE lrS� �,. iii••, I'i�UB1�' L •I�v TREE PLANTING AREA STREET UflHTIND :7REET UOMN* _TI EET lel MNO- h M1h -R&CK OF CURB ALL FAD DROSSIMN TO BE RIGID NIAG CCHO-UM Rid' TO R/W �MRE SIDEWALK OR PA7HWAY 18 INSTALLED. Standard Plate Library City sof Monticello Title - joint 'Trench Utility for New Residential Developments 03-08 Platy o, Rsa:03-15 7002 Standard Plate Library City of Monticello DESIGNED BY: C J J RUM RIVER DRAWN BY: MSS LAND SURVEYORS & ENGINEERS CHECKED BY: PO sox 1044 Telephone: (763) 389-4476 TAE Princeton, MN 55371 Fax: (763) 631-0376 T�#IIe: Service Drop Locations for all Developments Qat*: 0.3-05 Plan "0' Revi"a: 03-15 7005 SPIRIT HILLS SOUTH r� AL EOMM 4 20F U ifl 0WV 97H XY E.OMMM 0A5) b4XES ANO MUM MAlWM P907 FAW P12" WM DFRX 12, PSL l]TE.iTY EASEMENT 11'_1y' ►' 21 S s' a 1' TYPICAL TYP}DAL I ySTKU r` :2. Standard Plate Library City sof Monticello t 0 z Title: Non .joint Trench Utility for Commercial/Industrial lie ve to pmenti Data` 03-05 Plate No' Pae' 7003 RPM Standard Plate Library City sof Monticello ra a m ft 6 1W A CALL T4 OOPHER STATE ONE {S4 -➢OC➢) IS REQ11l 1RED A MINIML OF 4A HOURS PRIOR TO PERFORMIND ANY EMCAVAMON. Title: Residential Building Erosion Control Dot*, 03-05 Revi"d' 03-15 CONSTRUCTION AND GRADING NOTES CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA Plata No, 6006 X P -4367.01 ELEC OAL TRMSFORId ERB ARE TMOALLY PL4OE➢ V4THIN 1E' OF THE BUILDIN-3 -DRAINI�x a: Lel." EASEMEN7 LINE S 0IR AND WATER STUBBED 11' INSIDE PROPIL Y LINE )-E;i, OR FIBER PEDEZrAL FIRER CPTID L J ?�7ELEPHONE '1 1 Q ' F � FI I F � r -RIC � NNN A E 1I E T RAS -T£IEPI KINE r� o a / Ir T T _T T — TELEVISION PROPERLY LiUBE TY P" TV Lei I �f••�f• �f• :f'• �]••�1• �1•'. i• '•f••�f••�f• Vii'• �]••�1 .1 •' Vii: �f� ��� �i� �]� �1� �i: :f: �,: ' S' t:OHDRT E . TREE PLANTWO AREA � i IEET UONTINB ZMEET L1p'1TIH8 i"TREET UgiLiM— — BACK OF cure f ALL ROR.D s "aS TO BE RIGID mmo mmDuITS —� " TO f1fv,' "v ERE SIDE't4" OR PATHWAY IS INSTALLED, :2. Standard Plate Library City sof Monticello t 0 z Title: Non .joint Trench Utility for Commercial/Industrial lie ve to pmenti Data` 03-05 Plate No' Pae' 7003 RPM Standard Plate Library City sof Monticello ra a m ft 6 1W A CALL T4 OOPHER STATE ONE {S4 -➢OC➢) IS REQ11l 1RED A MINIML OF 4A HOURS PRIOR TO PERFORMIND ANY EMCAVAMON. Title: Residential Building Erosion Control Dot*, 03-05 Revi"d' 03-15 CONSTRUCTION AND GRADING NOTES CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA Plata No, 6006 X P -4367.01 Cn X w 0 r - i CD z Q 0 z Q J i c� z ry W w z c� Ez �w L o o� DATE I w o N w 00 n, o �n n Q J► K 50 0 50 100 SCALE IN FT. LEGEND -----856---- EXISTING CONTOUR > EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EXISTING WATERMAIN >> EXISTING STORM SEWER G EXISTING GAS T—BUR EXISTING TELEPHONE U -OH EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITY P—BUR EXISTING UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC N EXISTING GATE VALVE EXISTING HYDRANT ® EXISTING STORM STRUCTURE Qs EXISTING SANITARY STRUCTURE W DELINEATED WETLAND EXISTING TREELINE EXISTING BITUMINOUS SURFACE CLEAR & GRUB TREES/BRUSH X REMOVE TAGGED TREE ---------- FULL DEPTH SAWCUT ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ SILT FENCE SEE CITY PLATE NO. 6006 ON SHEET 9 0000°° 00000000000000000 °0000 CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE °o°o°o°o°o°o°o°o° SEE CITY PLATE NO. 6001 ON SHEET 8 ON Y, 11 zf / I �I p,ay / CLEAR_ AND GRUB 0.29 ACRES lbdl / PROTECT GAS MARKER/SIGN �- ;,05? \ \ \ \ / / / I — 14" �p� p\O \ C- 4 REMOVE 19LF BLOCK WALL /I 11, / /� ��� ,/ " 4 _ o / /Ilr'',/ '1° o/ �' / / / / I I I iVILDWOd ce\ 1070- — /1°° / \ / / 5 �UL�V�► _ p I 31 I. I . /� i l _- J T -BURT_ _ 2II1° ° \ - -/ /6 /\ K #427 x1068` -1064 TJ 426 CLEAR AND GRUB 0.05 ACRES -1058- -1056- 1054- 1058--1056-1054- \ 04 ACRES AND GRUB 0. _ '0048, 0g a 060 M 0-1058- 0 1058 Ile -1056-PROTECT GAS MARKER/SIGN -AJ fi1P AlLLI ,\ X1036- LLJ Q1p48_ IN, Z / o1038 o c 104\ CLEAR AND GRUB 0.59 ACRES LLJ o 1026, 1036— 4 \ 11054-- I I 1024� 1p34. o M � �1 042 a1o22/ -1052. 1032 107-11 1--, / _I � - / �- _ / // /3 703 °4a8 Oo 4� PROTECT GAS MARKER/SIGN 1 o /,030 \ —1036 1-1 , /'011, 1034- 10 ,O'oma 1032- 10 \70 °-10A,0/VI 10 1o2a 3/ /\ / — 1 — \ 1 I \ 1048---- / 3R \ \ \ \ I I l I � I \ �\ T\ �'�/ '0a4 \ \ 1 1 I \ \ \ I I I I /1 I\ \ -1o3a ivl l \ I -1036- -1044 '° \ \ \\ \\ �\ \1042/ // / 11 I l I \\\� \ --------__—•1034 / / / / / / i // // / / °I I \� REVISION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was DESIGNED BY: SHEET prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I �/� F" EXISTING CONDITIONS am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws CJJ RO.0UM lri iti r ER � O of the State Minn ata. ' DRAWN SPIRIT HILLS SOUTH AND REMOVALS PLAN of LAND SURVEYORS &ENGINEERS CHECKED BY: Po B. 1044 Telephone: (763) 389-4476 37 c AI .J. JOCHUM, P.E. Princeton, MN 55371 Fax: (763) 631-0376 CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA Date 4/8/19 Lic. No. 23461 TAE SHEETS P-4367.01 a� Cn X Li _I O r - (D Cn CD z Q z Q J C7 z CY w w z c� Ez 0w L/ L o o� DATE I w o / N W 00 Q n, 0 n Q LEGEND REFERENCE NOTES: - - - - - 856- - - - EXISTING CONTOUR W DELINEATED WETLAND > EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EXISTING TREELINE TALL CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC SHALL EXISTING WATERMAIN ENTER/EXIT SITE AT THIS LOCATION J 1 >> EXISTING STORM SEWER I EXISTING BITUMINOUS SURFACE G EXISTING GAS T—BUR EXISTING TELEPHONE CLEAR & GRUB TREES/BRUSH U -OH EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITY CEM2) P—BUR EXISTING UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC X REMOVE TAGGED TREE 50 0 50 100 D4 EXISTING GATE VALVE FULL DEPTH SAWCUT ---------- SCALE IN FT. EXISTING HYDRANT ® EXISTING STORM STRUCTURE ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ SILT FENCE SEE CITY PLATE NO. 6006 ON SHEET 9 Qs EXISTING SANITARY STRUCTURE o°o°o°o°o°o°o°o°o °o°°°°°°°°°°°°°°° CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE °°o°o°°o°°o°°o°o°°o°°o° SEE CITY PLATE NO. 6001 ON SHEET 8 10 \ \ // i/ / / // / / / / / °�o`� / / I / �------1050 0 \'off \ I / / \ % 040°0/ // / 1048—o--- �,'� I 1038- loco------ —1046, /// 1p56/' \ \ \ �o \ / / / 4g, \ / / \° / / I I I I I I I / � 1026 /1036— \ \\ \ \\ As \\ 1\ % � o o I, 46 \ / 4 \ \1054 / / / / / / I I I I \ \ \ \ \ \ 1 p24� — X1024' 034. \ \ \ \ \ \ RR\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ / / / / / \ I C� 0 /\104 / \\ \ I 1/ \ // / // / / / / i a o� �o \1022/ I 2_1052.- / // / / / // I I \ g\ 1032� \\\\\�\\\ \ Q`\'�I -I——•I _-_ I ////\/// o//\ / /// l / / /c / / /l // / // �1I\ 11/ 4/� mo` " o`' °1,�\�°\ti1\8dJ6 \\\\0_\�. \�iI\ \\ I\ \\\\ \\\ \ \ \ \\ \I\1\\ \ \\ \ \\\\ \ \\\\ 0 \ \ \\\\\2\I\I\ °4 \\?\ ' \\\06 2\\ \-8\ \ \\ \ \\ \\ —\\\\\\\` \\\\ \\\ \ \\ \\\\` \ \\\\ `r�-\� \, _1\o \ _ "\>\\ /- I0.\ 1 \\ 1 /► \ \ -\I\\\ \ \/I\\I1—\ 1i 1/ 1 \\ \I\O1/` \1 \\\\ Ii 1 1\ \1 \ I\\ \ 1\_ I II 1II 1 I\—\\_ — —\\ \\ - \\\-I\I— I 1I 5 I �I \ _ \\ —\\ I \\I\I\o\I _ / I \\ \ \/I\ \I\1I \ \ I\ xI i\\I \ \I I \\\1I \ \1 — \ I I\vQ4I ')\ `— z j—\ I\I \ —� \-I\-\—I \ \_�I L ,\� \ \— _ II I I 1I \ \\\ \u\\ \ - \\ \\ ` I _\ -'/ °_/1 / `._/J\ '\/ - I\/ \/// 1`/ - /\ \// /\//////i//J/ I — / \/ / /// // //' //// // / //\—/ �///// / //-/ //II / // /// // /// //_ /// // / /// i/�/_//Ij I l / /_l // / // / /// /\/ / l/ /^// //////// // /\// / //// \// // 1// ///!/ // �// / /1// /�'/ / //—// / // // //// / / //7 \///r //� // // / / /— ////// ' // /// / /—/__ /'/// /// /i / ///— _ f /// ///\\--/�//—/—// o / ryI—�1/,I /ti/°I .I//I ,I• tiI I 1 I^/ � oI�/—/,// III II II /1 / / / \\� \/ \ I i \/ \ 1/1 \0 01/\ 'a '° � , 703 \°8\ ° / � 4\ PROTECT GAS MARKER/SIGN -1036 31 o/ \\;° -1034- ,0 '0?�°& z1032- iS ° \ 10 026 \10`� o /I \ \/ \I% - � 1O /o W102 '° -1048 -1o3a�Z/1022 CONSTRUCTION \LLI Z 1086z ENTRANCE 11-1 "1, /CLEAR AND GRUB 0.59 ACRES �-1044 — Oi -1p42 -1042-- ,032 00 00 0 O m M " \ 0, o 0 00000°c 00000c0 0N 1040- -- 1038,_ AON 1038--—•1o3s-- o25 -1026 1034-- � < 1036- -1026 10,32- 1034 032- 1034— 030— 103?` -1024 1030, 0-1026— 21028 MARKER/SIGN REMOVE GAS -----1024----- o 1020 00 0/ -------------1022----I---- --/-- / I / / / // N< 00 o00 X- 7024,_ —102Top of1e -1020- flev1=997.2 (02 j/1s) Jv ?�-.1018- oCLEAR AND GRUB 0.52 ACRES, CLEAR AND GRUB 0.27 ACRES 'O?o\ CLEAR AND GRUB 0.38 ACRES PROTECT GAS MARKER/SIGN # -1018- 1 006 004-- —1016— —1002- -1014 — 1002--1014— — _loos — S D -1012-T_F— \ \\ 012 - IN, / 0" REVISION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was DESIGNED BY: SHEET 00 prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I / , — / /— �/� ��% EXISTING CONDITIONS am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws CJJ RUM lri iti r ER 1 1 of the State nn ata. i DRAWN BY: SPIRIT HILLS SOUTH AND REMOVALS PLAN OF ��C`AIGV—J. LAND SURVEYORS & ENGINEERS . JOCH U M, P.E. CHECKED BY: Princeton, MN 5537 Fax: (763) 63103769-4476 37 Date 4/8/19 Lic. No. 23461 TAE CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA SHEETS P-4367.01 0 z 0 Q CD 0 0 z Q ry 0 z Q J c� z it w w z z Ew a! �a o r; I � I o N W oo > o ry �n n Q 1 lh 50 0 50 100 SCALE IN FT. ----900-- 900 G T -BUR U -OH P -BUR -DT< -DT<- - ® 0 O LEGEND (SHEETS 12-13) I / � EXISTING CONTOUR 0000000000 SILT FENCE SEE CITY PLATE NO. 6006 ON SHEET 9 PROPOSED CONTOUR 1 I 1 EXISTING SANITARY SEWER INLET PROTECTION SEE CITY PLATE NO. 6004 ON SHEET 8 I III 1\ EXISTING WATERMAIN 0°0°0°0°0°0°0°0° CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE I ` I EXISTING STORM SEWER TOP OF FE °°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°° °°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°° SEE CITY PLATE NO. 6001 ON SHEET 8 ff R MNDOT STANDARD EXISTING GAS 414E AWD`-4o� 3E f IN (S)=103 .00 LOWEST OPENING ELEVATION EXISTING TELEPHONE 2 TREE PRESERVATION AREA 974.0 5) ® 3.$P°( EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITY z �\ HOUSE TYPE EXISTING UNDERGROUND ELECTRICFB=FULL <; FLOW DIRECTION FB BASEMENT z 1 z FBWO=FULL BASEMENT WALKOUT PROPOSED STORM SEWER W BASEMENT LOOKOUT- PROPOSED 4" CPEP DRAIN TILE X EOF=928.0 EMERGENCY OVERFLOW 974.0----FBLO=FULL (E)=100.00 \ '--- GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION PROPOSED STORM SEWER STRUCTURES vn I I p,oH 1 / / P -0y : 31 SLOPE 1 / 291 LF 15" IR�CP (CIJ 5) ® �'b9�/� I / I 1 / FES67 / \ INV=1018.20_ 25LF 15" RCP--r- (CL (CL 5) @ 4.30/ I / DATE REVISION 31 9 10110 0 0 6_4 - = 4 -ST - 66 3T_ 1058- \ \ ------T _ 4- � ' I I I 10,57.1 IE _. I 1058.7 i I= j I 1057.1 I ' 5- • - \ 1� - _-,oa6.�_ - L_ - 105 V I� 1�+0 1 >/ Y05/7.2// O 40. / I �10 p l �dsst� /.11,�"' S .6' \ M o + - I 1052 / �� U�}y• \ Li / 105C 1043 M I V_ �- �- o I I o �04Ar � o De NOTES: 1. SEE SHEET 9 FOR CONSTRUCTION AND GRADING NOTES. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN INLET PROTECTION THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE PROJECT. SEE CITY PLATE 6004 AND 6005 ON SHEET 8. CB 78 \ TOP OF FRAME=1053.00 OUTLET STRUCTURE PER�,oN MNDOT STANDARD PLATE °M __ ta" P -4 43E AND 4003E i / _ _ -' �,oy\ �� \� �� .I•__ G P -BURS / J.NV -1050.00 -7 _ /�04 I I 0 / I - e - / - > s 148LF 15" �P // �/ // / // /� 1 /I /1 / L /__ //// // \� , J / = I - I I �-� � -� 1 1 �Q-5)j ® 2.5 0 / / , /' / / / / / / / �_- __-� // / _ � � ..,,,... �-T-BUR n I 427 ' � -g=R ' o-� -X_103 1---- x X. I l / l / I,/ I I/ / / �1040, 1 o ... k . I / X. / os 1042 I I� \ \ ,os 1055. I I r I ,jos LO $Ln to I o I 1 N I * I 1 1 \ o I.. L I L 1 Ob \7 703 L `u+ c, o� " - - \'lf + 00 W 1057.2 I / ° I LO I M \ I .. I v \ I \I \ / / FB I ItB 1 / \ 1 / o, IIj_ CD - -10,52.0 1 1057 � I 2 / \ / 6x 1-10507- �\\ I_ V -1036rto / 13+00 14+00 \ / 1\ Q\� . 8 \ n I 120 \ , M � Fo T.!OP / moi/r 1027.0BISON AVENUE o - INV 1 .0 I L- - ===--- J \ //\O�UTLFl UCTURE PER ---- M�I�C%T/ ANDARD PLATE r / / / /I I 55•7 /�i I ,\ / / \�.0224I / ND 4003E 1 oso 0300o2s�' 1056.2II 10 w 1 026FBW M024 -,022 ' FE O �Y / / / v .09 1 b I / �' 104 I 1 a / I / �► / �- __ 2� ALF 15 H PE • , � / / / ��g lam/ � I �/ , � / � / / O � I i / \ 7 '036• / / / / / / I '`� �` `' \ 1 / / �A ,' I / .1ok� 1 3 ,y�L/ - 1- 0� / - ,a - .22% 1032 J r t / - /�o 104 L -pkv y103 Leo / � 04 / ' � � /102 102 Q,1 / / o� �/� \ - _ 1038 1 I /I' /F k ' / i i i / 1°0 %]' - 103, I / \ �I 1036 ,°°� /1024 / _ b " I/ NOS '� \ \-I\\ -10,4, \ �0 x'13 \ \ I _ �, \ CJ 0 0 / / / / .° °, \ O 2 X/ 8r=o-��// 'oma S / . i�; d / \ 102 1i�,� / I ' 422 �1 /�/ \ •L R\ l� \ \ ��I I I l ,p r\ (�Q , I� // ,/ , - -- --�-� v \ 3 _ 3$' I 1 Q24� I 1 F / / \ l� 1 X034 // / I ,fi02�.7 104. / L -I / / / �° \ 33 I 1 / \ \L029_2 I I 1 // / I 1 I 1 I 1 / �"- X03 �2\ \ \ \ �' \� I I 10}34.0 / II 1 // 1 ° \\ �\ -- 1 192 ' �•S \ 1. �� �I I� / �I / I �\ \ - --L I._,- I I / c� -- F I- - - _1034- - - / / / /� / I / ' I I - 11,/ LL_ / I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was DESIGNED BY: SHEET prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I GRADING DRAINAGE AND am a dulyLicensed Professional Engineer under the laws CJJ 12 of the State Minn ota. ' 9 DRAWN BY: RUM RIVER 14 EROSION CONTROL PLAN of MSS LAND SURVEYORS & ENGINEERSCHECKED BY: O Box T044Telephone: (763) 389-4476 37 �C_ AI J. JOCHUM, P.E. Princeton, MN 55371 Fax: (763) 631-0376 CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA Date 4/8/19 Lic. No. 23461 TAE SHEETS P-4367.01 Iq I I / � I 1 p \ I 1 I 1 � I , II 11 I III 1\ I \. I ` I I CB '05 TOP OF FE AME=10421.Qb OUTLET STRUCTURE ff R MNDOT STANDARD PITE 414E AWD`-4o� 3E f IN (S)=103 .00 2 11_F 15" IZCP_ (CL 5) ® 3.$P°( z �\ Z e ` LLJ/ \V z 1 z \ W CB 06 RIM=1033.69 I(N)=1030.00 ZNV (E)=100.00 \ 291 LF 15" IR�CP (CIJ 5) ® �'b9�/� I / I 1 / FES67 / \ INV=1018.20_ 25LF 15" RCP--r- (CL (CL 5) @ 4.30/ I / DATE REVISION 31 9 10110 0 0 6_4 - = 4 -ST - 66 3T_ 1058- \ \ ------T _ 4- � ' I I I 10,57.1 IE _. I 1058.7 i I= j I 1057.1 I ' 5- • - \ 1� - _-,oa6.�_ - L_ - 105 V I� 1�+0 1 >/ Y05/7.2// O 40. / I �10 p l �dsst� /.11,�"' S .6' \ M o + - I 1052 / �� U�}y• \ Li / 105C 1043 M I V_ �- �- o I I o �04Ar � o De NOTES: 1. SEE SHEET 9 FOR CONSTRUCTION AND GRADING NOTES. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN INLET PROTECTION THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE PROJECT. SEE CITY PLATE 6004 AND 6005 ON SHEET 8. CB 78 \ TOP OF FRAME=1053.00 OUTLET STRUCTURE PER�,oN MNDOT STANDARD PLATE °M __ ta" P -4 43E AND 4003E i / _ _ -' �,oy\ �� \� �� .I•__ G P -BURS / J.NV -1050.00 -7 _ /�04 I I 0 / I - e - / - > s 148LF 15" �P // �/ // / // /� 1 /I /1 / L /__ //// // \� , J / = I - I I �-� � -� 1 1 �Q-5)j ® 2.5 0 / / , /' / / / / / / / �_- __-� // / _ � � ..,,,... �-T-BUR n I 427 ' � -g=R ' o-� -X_103 1---- x X. I l / l / I,/ I I/ / / �1040, 1 o ... k . I / X. / os 1042 I I� \ \ ,os 1055. I I r I ,jos LO $Ln to I o I 1 N I * I 1 1 \ o I.. L I L 1 Ob \7 703 L `u+ c, o� " - - \'lf + 00 W 1057.2 I / ° I LO I M \ I .. I v \ I \I \ / / FB I ItB 1 / \ 1 / o, IIj_ CD - -10,52.0 1 1057 � I 2 / \ / 6x 1-10507- �\\ I_ V -1036rto / 13+00 14+00 \ / 1\ Q\� . 8 \ n I 120 \ , M � Fo T.!OP / moi/r 1027.0BISON AVENUE o - INV 1 .0 I L- - ===--- J \ //\O�UTLFl UCTURE PER ---- M�I�C%T/ ANDARD PLATE r / / / /I I 55•7 /�i I ,\ / / \�.0224I / ND 4003E 1 oso 0300o2s�' 1056.2II 10 w 1 026FBW M024 -,022 ' FE O �Y / / / v .09 1 b I / �' 104 I 1 a / I / �► / �- __ 2� ALF 15 H PE • , � / / / ��g lam/ � I �/ , � / � / / O � I i / \ 7 '036• / / / / / / I '`� �` `' \ 1 / / �A ,' I / .1ok� 1 3 ,y�L/ - 1- 0� / - ,a - .22% 1032 J r t / - /�o 104 L -pkv y103 Leo / � 04 / ' � � /102 102 Q,1 / / o� �/� \ - _ 1038 1 I /I' /F k ' / i i i / 1°0 %]' - 103, I / \ �I 1036 ,°°� /1024 / _ b " I/ NOS '� \ \-I\\ -10,4, \ �0 x'13 \ \ I _ �, \ CJ 0 0 / / / / .° °, \ O 2 X/ 8r=o-��// 'oma S / . i�; d / \ 102 1i�,� / I ' 422 �1 /�/ \ •L R\ l� \ \ ��I I I l ,p r\ (�Q , I� // ,/ , - -- --�-� v \ 3 _ 3$' I 1 Q24� I 1 F / / \ l� 1 X034 // / I ,fi02�.7 104. / L -I / / / �° \ 33 I 1 / \ \L029_2 I I 1 // / I 1 I 1 I 1 / �"- X03 �2\ \ \ \ �' \� I I 10}34.0 / II 1 // 1 ° \\ �\ -- 1 192 ' �•S \ 1. �� �I I� / �I / I �\ \ - --L I._,- I I / c� -- F I- - - _1034- - - / / / /� / I / ' I I - 11,/ LL_ / I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was DESIGNED BY: SHEET prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I GRADING DRAINAGE AND am a dulyLicensed Professional Engineer under the laws CJJ 12 of the State Minn ota. ' 9 DRAWN BY: RUM RIVER 14 EROSION CONTROL PLAN of MSS LAND SURVEYORS & ENGINEERSCHECKED BY: O Box T044Telephone: (763) 389-4476 37 �C_ AI J. JOCHUM, P.E. Princeton, MN 55371 Fax: (763) 631-0376 CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA Date 4/8/19 Lic. No. 23461 TAE SHEETS P-4367.01 Iq z Q J n c� z it w w z c� z LJ ca_ Q! m o o r; co D� o � NW 00> o ry �n n Q NOTES: LEGEND (SHEETS 12-13) 1. SEE SHEET 9 FOR CONSTRUCTION AND GRADING NOTES. ----900- EXISTING CONTOUR ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ SILT FENCE SEE CITY PLATE NO. 6006 ON SHEET 9 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN INLET PROTECTION 900 PROPOSED CONTOUR INLET PROTECTION SEE CITY PLATE N0 6004 ON SHEET 8 THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE PROJECT. SEE CITY > EXISTING SANITARY SEWER . PLATE 6004 AND 6005 ON SHEET 8. 1 I EXISTING WATERMAIN 00000000000000000 CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE LOWEST OPENING ELEVATION >> EXISTING STORM SEWER 00000000000000000 SEE CITY PLATE NO. 6001 ON SHEET 8974.0----- G EXISTING GAS HOUSE TYPE T -BUR EXISTING TELEPHONE TREE PRESERVATION AREAFB FULL BASEMENT FB FBWO=FULL BASEMENT WALKOUT REFERENCE NOTES: u -OH EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITY 50 0 50 100 FBLO-FULL BASEMENT LOOKOUT P -BUR EXISTING UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC <� FLOW DIRECTION 974.0 - SCALE IN FT. >> PROPOSED STORM SEWER GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION 1� ALL CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC SHALL -DT<- -DT<- - PROPOSED 4" CPEP DRAIN TILE X EOF=928.0 EMERGENCY OVERFLOW ENTER/EXIT SITE AT THIS LOCATION ® ® OD PROPOSED STORM SEWER STRUCTURES \ vel I 00 LO pj + - 10.52 / I�/ �^ / I \ ` v / \-1050]J---- !1 I II J/ \ / / �6k u� L I � a' A \ \ 1\042 v 1 /� / // // /i. // .j �oo� O / - -1048_ _ / 5k�� / \� \ c� v ,°��- / 04 'y - �\ 1p40 / / r ,� \ / / / \ \ / \co rn I _� \i 13+00 14+0 \ / 1\ . .8 \ 1 10001,311-1Iop -a\ \y �2-- �/ r 7F - ___ \ 7\� -'c\ Q 1 1 .t /I M M I \ / 10 CB � 1TI W= 110 Ic '°Al „\ I o / 04 "oe �'oou'� / OS \� ,/ I.-1a�024.0 \ � o I.1po�u' � a - _ - . \ . _ .. \+ � � � I / / I I L- -------- � \ /10Z \ Li. /` / CB 106 1 ` ( \- J G /� of /\r__-----�77105 \ o\// oI ' , I /1°26 103ZA13'r.� I \ m / / / / I 105 (' , - r- ------ - RIM =10 69l /^I �� �_ / a'Usi i , I I \ 1030 / ' 10 } nA2 _ - N M/ r / / t / 1 �SJr, I �' I ' 4 / /I . i I. \ 1028 - IN (N)=10 0.00 103 �- �/ / 7 / 1056 2- / / 1 I / / / �- \ v 1 �4 I o / 1 / / / 1 I / hI / d, J \ to 1026 1 / IN E=10a0�00 \ \ \ 032-- -} -I �/ �. , IA, Cp p I , 10 I o / ( ) \ \ \ I / / / D� / / / I yV I �I r L / o`er I / 2/ / I •I / / y, M X1024, J -1022' / / - � 13r-�'� ^oma / I / /`p2� I - - ffLF .15" ICP \\I_ �\o �,�-//,�o��//�__/ o�----� » 1�Il/I 2� LF 15 H7E (5) G-.'6 9�/� \ Ir\ 1 \ \ , \ �03 / / / �o o� �e \ I a Q I I °k� 1 3 - / p / - ®, 7.22% \ I e _ _ 1032- 1 \\ �-�-/oma 042- - x \c� 11�2II - �o�b , /103 � `/moo � ��/ �' �/ 'U / i 9 \ X10 4 Off` / ' / / , 102 i �, I o i 1 �. x 6 /\ °," \ -C- -- 103C I / '\ �I1036 / X77 1024 // /- 'I//N1�Ai \ cd \ O I - i\ / 4 I 1 �\\ ^ / / '°� / / o ��\ n \�� \ / \ pM�' / 103'4 __I / n/ \\ ` 03 �� ' // // / // / // //✓ /�/ oma. �01� 16,/ �/ -1074\ \ 0 \ CIO � J N I I I J / v� �' / / t \ / " ^ I I - - \ �J 0 3'"ri kti / / / / / / `° o ° \ 1 m I 4� I / I I I // / Q3 /- Z__ // / ? o I \ ; 1 o , I I 1��' / �s\ Y' �\ Q s - - j FES 67--\ 7 / �_`'02sa : \\ I I \ I 1 1 'Ind / / / /1 'oma/ V / / Q3�•s / / / \ I I I / / `" / -I �L.,o�' / I / �' / /ISI /�- ,L' INV=1018.20 / \ I �I I l / / 1 / / / / / R \ \\\ li X02 , ��� / 1� / / �/ / / - -- --�- 7 ''024 I \ I I \ -I ' / ' / / o / F ` / 1 I I '0 r \ - -1924 I I - v - � , 1- v \N C H 121 t o3 lI I - - 1 -029 7 �1 I, 1024. / / _\� / / o T OF FRAM=1007.5 'o Q33.1 1 I \ 029.2 / I I 1 1 I I / '022,-L-7-� d4�0 / l0 3� \ \ \ 1 10}34.0 I lI I \ L---- II II ,��I /I / / 1 �-CITi -- � / 4 3 \ \ \ � 1 I I �1 6 i / " � / I � 1 \ (N)= 1 004.5\ 25LF 15" RCP / \ \ \ - ! 192 / �.S \ 1. \ �l / l I I �� �� \- -- �- 1' 1 / / ,.,I _/ I \ / I I I I �� F f 1' / /�� dNV (S)=1004.4 (CL 5) @ 4. 0% / I I _ \ / . \ \ �I I / 11 I I I ` \ l\ . ` - - - _ _ -1034- - / / / / I D I /. I '/0 / I I I TLET STRUCTU PER -� \ \ ` 2+Q0 `- / �4+�0 �\ l 10 \ -� / / l 1 \ \ >\ - I I 102 7- V 1�, / 124'1 I o// '' / i/ / I I \- T STANDARD 0+00 ° ° + \ 1 I\ \ I L'.� 1034.4 1022- - T rt - _, I ,I / ' / �o / / \ \ \ ---1034-7 i / / I \ %� - -1 I' /+`/ / / _ cv Pr, P L 4143E AND >� >> o -- :�. S \ \�� T --_� / / / / I I \�i=___�- _ --=1030 �1/' moo - J 603E/ \ \ ' . / 1 02 .4` Xp T� _ -J - 32 /�� _' - 104 / / / ,�O / / - I o �-... / / 00-00 CONSTRUCTION - - - -� - - FT ,�o - / +00 - I /�/ 7S LF HDPE / '(L / 6+00 i - 0-+0 1 1 / 5/ �.-; I I I w ENTRANCE 1 W \ \ �O y� - - _ _ / / J 9±00- - - - o / I I `0:50 Z 1 \ 02 \ _ I'�-� / 02� ,I - I 7+00 -, - 7�°Za 80 / I I - I / 1 // / �'� / �� c/ IW I 11 1 �\ / w / e \ \ _ - / / / 1 �: \ _ WTLDWO�� UI,EV�cRI� / » f - E / / / �, I I I o�ES -'I g2 / I I I �\ _ - -� -, f � '" '?--'�:�. / INV=1004.0 / > �, I �\ r4 I v I ,tea �- /�'I' I I 1 / 630 - a•-------- - e �� 702 'o �'°? / + p2 %� / co r - X \ CB 1252 - \ \ '°2 / 1 _ _ _ ss - / _ I 1 / I I / I I I e \ / / TOP �F� FR ME=1004.0 / 1030• I t / I I 1020.5 1 I l l Z I 1.01 -1 / 7 - _,o,- I I 1026.0 I _ _ I \ ° \ �o� -L / I I� % - / 1028.8 I 1023.0/ ., �o Is 10 s I W - 001.0 Z \ \ \ J - , , . I 1031.8 / / I I I - / o00 • I OUTLET STR T RE W /\ o, L_ 101 ---_ - - I �_ / C I I r I I I 101 I I i 'v I/ ` LL. / \ R�-tu1 \ -.000, - - \-- - I \ 1.. 3 // ,0, FIR I I� �i F��Wwr-� `. \�'�,1A�\ �� 968 J \/ I PER IJINDOT STANDARD r. p�`ti ,��000- PLATE4143E AND 2C �n�� ; I .®J ho 1111' \ \ _ 100?'IN/ �__ \ I i o1�� qhs• I .k v / / / 2 1 _ �/ III �/ 4003E (J �- I / 024 / - _ I I s� 100,9-L �)� •• I co co i / `t I I / /r - �� 1 I > < I _ '01�\ \ / I o Qi m rn I / / 1016 �/ 1 F 15 HDPE O) -� - I 022 �[1 - - - -1010 - / o e m o \ \ _ \ <) o I _ - I 102 -'/ / - 1014 �� 1010.5 EOF=1012 ® 12.35/ \ I \ I 0 - 1012 - s - < 01 Q '-� _ > I �> > DR ' \ _-r= - _ - <- �4i6 - _ _ - D \ >> \\ EOF=1004.0 T1� 10l - - _ _ o I 101 C / - - - - - - _ 9 y "' B►'=y1 0 y I � ►. 1014 � � �- /- - - - � - � >7 DR > » > >Z \ - 008- 12 - \ _I U 1 2 f « Y� # 15 \ / ---- `-1QiQ \ __-----'----------- -,00a� / STMH 124 - - / '° -�-- 4 ___1018- / / - - - _--- = ------ 1006 3C�B_�- x RIM -1003.2 `- _ _ S o �\ �- _1016- - / EOF= ,'\O�T�� 10 0:5---- __ -�_ _ - - --- - __ --1002--RIM 10_0_2:9 _ INV (SE)=99M MW .8 t47LF 151 RCP = _ -1014- /�/ \ ` I -' ��- = C6-fi � _ -_ - �~ _ _ -loo?NV-(=999.34 \ \ \ \ , INV (NW)=998.9 -1 CL -5 ® �.06 - - -1012 - 1 = kLDPE ®21 % ``1- - _ \ I \ 1 012- ( ,� � / \- � \ �\ / \ \� / // //�' TO,F�\0 FRAME -1012.0 \ I � g9a-' -_- \-� INV (NE)=10 0.2 \ _/ I I\ \ \� I \ I --I 1 1 / i/ //// \ \\ �/� // ,o°a // I V (E)-1007.0 �/ /' - �\ INV (W)-10010.2 `I I I I I/^� / ` / ---/ -/ /' '//\/ / TLE TR--IUFC/ / /- `10^ r////, CB 16 / /- / / / / °�. / M OT STANDARD PLATE //// ,4- o I� TOP OF FRAME=10 6.0 / / / /' /' / / \ 41E AND 4003E EX. MH 9 / l I 1 INV(W)=1013. � / � / /' // � v RIM 102_84 INV (NW) -998.52 OUTLET STRUCTURE PER // / /' - / I I ' � MNDOT STANDARD PLATE / / INV (W)�994.60I INV (S)7994.60 14143E A'1ID 4003E / / fi REVISION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was DESIGNED BY: SHEET prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I GRADING DRAINAGE AND am a dulyLicensed Professional Engineer under the laws CJJ "000/ of the State Minn ota. ' 9 DRAWN BY: RUM RIVER 13 EROSION CONTROL PLANMSS LAND SURVEYORS & ENGINEERSCHECKED BY: O Box,o44Telephone: (763) 389-4476�C_ AI J. JOCHUM, P.E. Princeton, MN 55371 Fax:(763)631-0376 CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA Date 4/8/19 Lic. No. 23461 TAE 37 SHEETS P-4367.01 11 0+I00 I I I I z Q J n 1-110 z it w w z Ez n 0 N I� DATE ED N 00 > 0n, n n Q I I v NI I z I I I _-----------� z I HYDRANT AND 6" GATE I d . L _ _ _ -12" GATE VALVE AND L / I VALVE AND BOX I �° - a _ : BOX SEE SHEET 5 I 12LF 6" DIP_ I - 12 DIP BEND zj SEE SHEET 5 __--___----- J << 12" DIP BEND r^ Z I _ / 12 DIP BEND _ I I ► i 12" DIP BEND 12"X8"DIP CROSS 1 -- 1 4+00 --------- 12"X6" DIP TEE " I — < I < 1 3+00 ,� SMH 24 I <� SMH 25 v- I y I _ 12" DIP • I 1 2+00 _ I SMH , 10 SMH 26 - S *00 PLUG _ I - » > 1+00 LO SMH 27 6+00 w >> V _ w 12" GATE VALVE AND > >> d ° °�I ____--------------' < �N_ BOX SEE SHEET 5 wMH 28 41 a _ N I I I \ ri -- I z - I I I c I I REFERENCE NOTES: I I I I 1Q CONSTRUCT WATER SERVICE PER CITY I I I V I I STANDARD PLATE 2006 ON SHEET 5. I o I I 2 CONSTRUCT SEWER SERVICE PER CITY I STANDARD PLATE 3004 ON SHEET 6. I I I a I 33 CONSTRUCT SANITARY MANHOLE PER CITY I I I I I STANDARD PLATE 3001 ON SHEET 6. I I I ..1...040.... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .� . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........................................ 1040 .._x...0.35.... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . a, 0) . . . . . . . . . ... M . . . . . . . . 0 00 Oo 1._0-3..5 to \ o rn 00 to / �`n Oofoo foo N N O) r, .� p N II 0 � rz UA M O O co � I I to N NC14 11 � w .._x....30.... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . N . MLfj— — LO Nw = II 0 0 0 It C*4 01-I � w \ = I I . � � > > 1030 New = II > > oo:�:::: II.... > z z = Ilzv� MM> > Nom? / 1025 N z z Z 1025 ............................................................................... O 1020 �L 12 — " DIP WATERMAIN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.5' MIN. 1020 89LF 8" PVC SDR35 ® 0.50% - 52LF 8" PVC 59LF 8" PVC — 66LF 8" PVC SDR35 ® 0.50% i SDR35 ® 0.50% SDR35 ® 0.50% 1015 .................................... . f 12" DIP WATERMAIN 1010 ........................................ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Il' N O cel ^ 0.0 7 C-4 O. ' rn. U). M. ai.N N N M N N o N o N o N o O O O O O 1005 0 1 2 REVISION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was DESIGNED BY: prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I CJJ am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the StateMinn ota. i DRAWN BY: MSS CHECKED BY: AI J. JOCHUM, P.E. Date 4/8/19 Lic. No. 23461 TAE RUM RIVER LAND SURVEYORS & ENGIlNBERS PO Box 1044 Telephone: (763) 389-4476 Princeton, MN 55371 Fax: (763) 631-0376 1015 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ......................................... V- 110. N N O 00 06 M M M^ N C N o.N o.N o.N o.N o N O O O O O 1005 4 5 5 SHEET SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN 14 SPIRIT HILLS SOUTH WILDWOOD BOULEVARD CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA 37 SHEETS P-4367.01 q HYDRANT AND 6" GATE / VALVE AND BOX I 1 13LF 6" DIP / 1 SEE SHEET 5 / ----' L-- ------- 12" DIP BEND / 12"X6" DIP TEE / SMH 27 i cv 6+00 W SMH 28 SMH 29 / fd d d ° / / I / / 1 / / 1 � � 1 / 1 / I / I / 1 / I / 1 / 1 / 1 / 1 0 r - CD z Q CY 0 z Q J / z CY w w z c� Ew N I, DATE o/ N W 00> n, 0 n Q 1035 A r4l ------------------J 1 / I / 1 / 1 / I / 1 / 1 / I / 1 / I / 1 / 1 / 1 / I n9n 83LF 8" PVC SDR35 ® 0.50% / 78LF 8" PVC SDR35 ® 0.50% — —`O M M O M N rn vi o 00T_ Ir - .1 ..__._5. o 0 0) o:: 0004 N�� o 11 =�:2z M:2> > tn�— 1010 N Fx z z 0 / HYDRANT AND 6" GATE - VALVE AND BOX / 12LF 6" DIP / SEE SHEET 5 �-------------------- / SMH 44 9+00 > I ? / D >> M I I I I I I I I I I I L— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — -- 12"X6" 12"X6" DIP TEE I (REFERENCE NOTES: 1Q CONSTRUCT WATER SERVICE PER CITY STANDARD PLATE 2006 ON SHEET 5. jQ2 CONSTRUCT SEWER SERVICE PER CITY STANDARD PLATE 3004 ON SHEET 6. IQ3 CONSTRUCT SANITARY MANHOLE PER CITY STANDARD PLATE 3001 ON SHEET 6. I L— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — I I I I I 10+00 > I - >I > 1 » » » » » n LA�'— A 11 + DO Ln OD 51 ° ° d 4 n n n / MS - -� r------------------ --I r------------------ ---�---------- - - - - - - /------------ 1005 ........................................ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . co^ nN MN rn� cow n� N00 N� NO NO Nrn Nao o o.0 o.0 o.0 o.� o.� 1000 ........................................ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 6 7 8 REVISION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was DESIGNED BY: prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I CJJ am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State Minn Uta. DRAWN BY: MSS ` C AI J. OCHUM, P.E. CHECKED BY: Date 4/8/19 Lic. No. 23461 TAE a 0 N o.C*4 1035 1030 J–L 1025 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . \ ...�._�_2.......... 1953LF.12 „ DIP WATERMAIN–TOTAL FOR WILpyV00p B0U LEVARD 1015 RUM RIVER (�S 7PPo S& ENGINEERS ox 1044 Telephone: (763) 389-4476 eton, MN 55371 Fax: (763) 631-0376 256LF 8„ PVC SDR 3.00% 1010 1005 co to W 10 M p o �.� �. N N N N N N N N N N � 0.� 0.C4 o.C4 0.0 0:; �O 1000 9 10 11 SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN SPIRIT HILLS SOUTH WILDWOOD BOULEVARD CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA SHEET 15 37 SHEETS P-4367.01 I I I I I I I i I V — I 1 � 12" DIP BEND I SEE SHEET 15 I + —. IU, \ I �� SMH 43 \ I--------------------- I .12" DIP 450 BEND I MH 42 I , I 12" DIP BEND I ° 0 I � 12+00 13+00 � � / —<!_ G b, SMH 4a - 1030 I � << u I � D ° ° °. n � --� �— I I I I I I , I I I I I I I I I I I I rn rn CO M N a) OC -4 N � 0 O O p� M �O O 1...025.. o 0 0 coo o a, 0 0 rnII II 00II,IIS LOo� M p W N W^ W Z N I I = ...1..020... cMi��? ? �.�z z z Naz z N�--- /. 1..0..1..5..: . — 0 7.5' MIN.. z 1010 -- < PVC Q 26LF 8„ 4835 ® 4.19% ��DR35 ®3 VC0 SD 0 00 0 CYi 1005 o UCD z .._1...0.0.0.... . . . Q 0 z Q J 95... ...........9 . . z_ w o� 0 MW 00. w z co co . Cd ai . 06 C) 0 0.0 0� .... 990 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NO 11 12 �(D I- DATE REVISION o N W 00> on, n REFERENCE NOTES: 1Q CONSTRUCT WATER SERVICE PER CITY \\ \ I STANDARD PLATE 2006 ON SHEET 5. \ \\ CONSTRUCT SEWER SERVICE PER CITY \ \ I I 1 STANDARD PLATE 3004 ON SHEET 6.Ln 1 Q3 CONSTRUCT SANITARY MANHOLE PER CITY \\ n Z \ 1 STANDARD PLATE 3001 ON SHEET 6. 1 HYDRANT AND 6" GATE I I 11� 11 VALVE AND BOX I 15LF 6" DIP I I 1 \\ 1 1 SEE SHEET 5 I I 11 HYDRANT AND 6" GATE 1 11 I 1 VALVE AND BOX 12" GATE VALVE AND BOX 1 I I 1 12LF 6" DIP SEE SHEET 5 1 I I SEE SHEET 5 1----------- ------------------------ c -----� �— - — — v � _ �� 12"X6" DIP TEE " — v I - 12"X6" DIP TEE I I I 15+00 16+00 IW I I 14+00 I < I < I SMH- 46 < I < < 17+00 I — - N — < -F— LU « << << << << 12"X8" DIP TEE 77 h — r— ---------------i r--- -------- -------------- ---i i— ---------_ —___ I I I I I I I I I I I I - I I i I i i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i i I 1045 10101025 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...1..0.0.5.... .._1..020.. — . R35. 0. 4.190/ — 392LF $» PVC SD 10001015 9951010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ................................................................................ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.Nco ^ M M M LO W) � M N W N p N N in M SO W) W) W) o.NO o.N o NO o NO 0. W) o.O o.0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...990............ ..1...005.. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 13 13 14 15 1 hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was DESIGNED BY: prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I CJJ �/� MV am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State Minn otlri % R V iti rERa. i DRAWN BY: SPIRIT HILLS SOUTH MSS 1 LA7PPo SURVEYORS & ENGINEERS CHECKED BY: ox 1044Telephone: (763) 389-4476 C AI J. JOCHUM, P.E. eton, MN 55371 Fax: (763) 631-0376 Date 4/8/19 Lic. No. 23461 TAE 1030 0 1025 co '-* Uri rnN N N . . . . . .. 0 0 0 . . . ....10.2.0. mil it it co ^ ^ ^ Boz 3 cn > > ?? 1015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ....10._1.0 . ooh c-Wj nW) M O M Cd O O 1005 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 16 SHEET SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN 16 OF WILDWOOD BOULEVARD 37 CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA SHEETS P-4367.01 0 1050 12"X12" DIP TEE 12" PLUG HYDRANT AND 6" GATE— VALVE AND BOX 12LF 6" DIP SEE SHEET 5 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATERMAIN 12" GATE VALVE AND BOX SEE SHEET 5 \ \ y i p REFERENCE NOTES: CONSTRUCT WATER SERVICE PER CITY / STANDARD PLATE 2006 ON SHEET 5. \\ \ 2 CONSTRUCT SEWER SERVICE PER CITY AeG� O STANDARD PLATE 3004 ON SHEET 6. \ 14 CONSTRUCT SANITARY MANHOLE PER CITY STANDARD PLATE 3001 ON SHEET 6. a LIZ \`OW 000 W21 i W 2 v 1� OX 41 L � �3 \ ,\ L / J c / \ 1050 M N 1045 UA � 00 10-45 M CV �y . �O O WT- T �N HOZ (nCo uj0 PO 1040 ` \ > > . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . "' -1.0-4.0 . . Nom?.?. of �> O IL w z 10351035 .... .. ............................... ......� ....�.......... �-WxZ Q F— o — Q _ O n,i .._1.._0.30.... i 7.5 I N. ......... ' M 12" DIP WATERMAIN CD 185LF 8" PVC SDR35 ® 0.50% 93LF 8" PVC SDR35 ® 0.50°0 z .._1.-025. ] ' ATERMAIN EXISTING 12' DIP W 1025 Q ry0 z Q J n �a 1...020... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... 102..................................... 0 f-Kz J nM N^ ao<G �to N O oO 06 oll o o 0 00 0 0 o 1.0.1.5 1015 Nr- 16 17 18 19 20 21 CD q DATE REVISION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was DESIGNED BY: SHEET � It DATE prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I °' am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws CJJ RVlrl itiVER SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN 7 of the State Minn ota. DRAWN BY: SPIRIT HILLS SOUTH OF 00 >LC r vn svRv oRs �vGnvMSWILDW00D BOULEVARD O Box 1044 Telephone: (763) 389-4476 37AI �J. HUM, P.E. CHECKED BY: Princeton, MN Fax: (763, 631-0376 CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA Q Date 4/8/19 Lic. No. 23461 TAE SHEETS P-4367.01 \ \ \ \ \ \ CONNECT TO EXISTING WATERMAIN 12" GATE VALVE AND BOX SEE SHEET 5 \ \ y i p REFERENCE NOTES: CONSTRUCT WATER SERVICE PER CITY / STANDARD PLATE 2006 ON SHEET 5. \\ \ 2 CONSTRUCT SEWER SERVICE PER CITY AeG� O STANDARD PLATE 3004 ON SHEET 6. \ 14 CONSTRUCT SANITARY MANHOLE PER CITY STANDARD PLATE 3001 ON SHEET 6. a LIZ \`OW 000 W21 i W 2 v 1� OX 41 L � �3 \ ,\ L / J c / \ 1050 M N 1045 UA � 00 10-45 M CV �y . �O O WT- T �N HOZ (nCo uj0 PO 1040 ` \ > > . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . "' -1.0-4.0 . . Nom?.?. of �> O IL w z 10351035 .... .. ............................... ......� ....�.......... �-WxZ Q F— o — Q _ O n,i .._1.._0.30.... i 7.5 I N. ......... ' M 12" DIP WATERMAIN CD 185LF 8" PVC SDR35 ® 0.50% 93LF 8" PVC SDR35 ® 0.50°0 z .._1.-025. ] ' ATERMAIN EXISTING 12' DIP W 1025 Q ry0 z Q J n �a 1...020... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... 102..................................... 0 f-Kz J nM N^ ao<G �to N O oO 06 oll o o 0 00 0 0 o 1.0.1.5 1015 Nr- 16 17 18 19 20 21 CD q DATE REVISION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was DESIGNED BY: SHEET � It DATE prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I °' am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws CJJ RVlrl itiVER SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN 7 of the State Minn ota. DRAWN BY: SPIRIT HILLS SOUTH OF 00 >LC r vn svRv oRs �vGnvMSWILDW00D BOULEVARD O Box 1044 Telephone: (763) 389-4476 37AI �J. HUM, P.E. CHECKED BY: Princeton, MN Fax: (763, 631-0376 CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA Q Date 4/8/19 Lic. No. 23461 TAE SHEETS P-4367.01 I V I I I I I REFERENCE NOTES: CONSTRUCT WATER SERVICE PER CITY \ I I I I STANDARD PLATE 2006 ON SHEET 5. CONSTRUCT SEWER SERVICE PER CITY I I j I I Q STANDARD PLATE 3004 ON SHEET 6. I i v 00 (3) CONSTRUCT SANITARY MANHOLE PER CITY STANDARD PLATE 3001 ON SHEET 6. I I I I I 0 I I I I C: <_ I 8"X12" DIP TEE I I I_ _----------_I I I" I I I I I I 8" DIP BEND I I --------------J 8" DIP L HYDRANT AND 6" GATE CONNECT TO EXISTING WATERMAIN I _-_ J �--- ------ BEND VALVE AND BOX I j 8" DIP BEND 8" GATE VALVE AND BOXI------------- - L — DIP SEE SHEET 5 �p SEE SHEET 5-- J L v - 8" GATE VALVE AND BOX V SEE SHEET 5 (TYPICAL) 8"X6" DIP TEE v _ I� I v 4+00 SMH 11 / 8" DIP BEND <� � I I I 3+00 2+00 — .< I < SMH 10 < < 1 +00, < < < — I « v . << « c 5 00 I I , 6+00 = _ - _ « _ SMH 12 - SMH 13 << / N �=B _ .p ° G G P —BUR —G 'BUR ° p _G� I p� �, I 8" GATE VALVE AND BOX " _ I i I SEE SHEET 5 \\\1 I I I - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1.. 0.3...5.... . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . 1..0....3...5 1.0.45.. . . . . . . . ... . . . . � . 10.45 `°U-)04 C1q / MNN �M O O c0 �� � N 0II0 1030.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 030 10.40.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.......0...........4......_0 __M '.:: ZN . / Z Z � N Nom— — Nom— — O O 1.._0.25. 1.0...2..5 1.03.5.. V- V. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1..0.35 N II II / JL 0)N0 oz c^ (Mo o o o N ? ? 10201020 1030o ... 8, 'ERMP\N 1030 ......... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . �'5' MIN. _.._..._... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..... t tito / 0 00 a > > > -- O C) 00 N FXZ Z Z z 1015-�( O� P`Fo R e\SoN n 1 � 8.00 0� 1025 ...... N`_1.0.1.5 . ..... ZN > >QF 7.5' MIN. O ? 1010. . . 1010 1020 1020 , oP . . . Ps... 6a,, CD .... Pvc50R3%100LF 8" PVC SDR35 @0.50%Qz 5.9� 015; 10151005. . . . . . . . . . .005 1.._.......... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ......... i Q a, E��STING 25�\-F 8 Q pIP W ATERMAIN J n 10.00 1000 10.10 10.10 n77 Ln 00 0 0 LO O 00 00 rn to W-- W d O O . rn M O w O cC O r, W cG 00 M 0) N LOLorn z O i N �.� N.0 N.M M M Ui d•. U% d•.� d•.O d .� Ln. L N O O o O N O N O N O N M O M O M O z 0 0 0 0 0 9.9....5.... . . . . . . . . . ..... . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . Ln 995 1005 1005 NC� 0 1 2 3 3 4 5 6 ro DATE REVISION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was DESIGNED BY: SHEET prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I °' am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws CJJ RVlrl RIVER SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN 18 of the Stateq_iAI nn ota. � DRAWN BY: SPIRIT HILLS S 0 U T H °F 00 ;_I r vn svRv oRs wGnvM S BISON AVENUE O tY CHECKED BY: Po Box 1044 Telephone: (763) 389-4476 L �J. JOCHUM, P.E. Princeton, MN 5537 Fax: (763) 631-0376 CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA 37 Q Date 4/8/19 Lic. No. 23461 TAE SHEETS P-4367.01 HYDRANT AND 6" GATE � ��\ VALVE ANDBOX'S 8"X6" DIP TEE 8" DIP BEND / �� %N115LF 6" DIP � SEE SHEET 5 \ � \�� \\�IN, 8" DIP BEND J \ SMHS 16 8" DIP BEND 9 f O0 / IN. "I SMH 15 v: / v 00 \ SMH 17 Q) \ \. �\ SMH 18 \ /// REFERENCE NOTES: / / Q CONSTRUCT WATER SERVICE PER CITY STANDARD PLATE 2006 ON SHEET 5. CONSTRUCT SEWER SERVICE PER CITY STANDARD PLATE 3004 ON SHEET 6. CONSTRUCT SANITARY MANHOLE PER CITY / STANDARD PLATE 3001 ON SHEET 6. I a l j a SMH 19 8" DIP BEND — v I __ __ SEE SHEET 18 A i --- _--/ , SEE SHEET 20 1065. . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . ... CD�. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.._0.65 . LOo o It 0 0 CS co o_ 00 O O M N O M � 1060 II II o•lW-I. N \ � � � � C� .................................10 .. �o � (o Lo � / �. o . o . Moo � � It M ��> > in FE Z / r-0Ld � �LO�� p01 to p N�Z Z ���� ON Z N Z 1.._05.5... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . t. �. Z .Z . » » 1..._05.5 �ozv J�L / �"r_ _ V)Mz cnMz z >.> (nmz 1....05.0... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1....05.0 7 5 MIN / .. ... .. 8" DIP WATERMAI.N 1045 1045z ....... Q In M 0 PVC �i 5LF . 65LF 8" PVC SDR35 ® 0.50% 1040... �400% i ....... SpR35o CD z 1035 a o _ CY SOR35 � 1\S 1....030... z_It this plan, specification, or report was .00 prepared by me or am a duly Licensed under my direct supervision Professional Engineer under and that I the laws CJJ of the State Minn ry M O rn 00 i p n ^ 00 N w -4 N Ln M p Ln. 00 O It. n �. M ^ N It. rn It. p z 0 0 0 0 0 0 1025 Nr- 6 7 8 DATE REVISION o� N W 00> n, O n Q I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was DESIGNED BY: prepared by me or am a duly Licensed under my direct supervision Professional Engineer under and that I the laws CJJ of the State Minn ota. DRAWN BY: �CAIGVIJOCHUM, i MSS W Date 4/8/19 P.E. Lic. No. 23461 CHECKED BY: TAE 177LF .8". PVC . SDR35 .0 .0.50% M (pp � O . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . 9 RUM RIVER 7PPo S& ENGINEERS ox 1044 Telephone: (763) 389-4476 eton, MN 55371 Fax: (763) 631-0376 58LF 8" PVC SDR35 ® 0.50% co ^ co OR n N rn rn O O O 10 SPIRIT HILLS SOUTH ....................................... 54LF 8" PVC 57LF 8" PVC! SDR35 ® 0.50% SDR35 ® 0.50% . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . ..1....040 1035 1....030 nM to Lo. o LO O � p 1025 . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . ......................................... 11 11 SHEET SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN 19 OF BISON AVENUE 37 CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA SHEETS P-4367.01 1060 8"X12" DIP TEE v v 8" GATE VALVE AND BOX - SEE SHEET 5 / 8" DIP BEND REFERENCE NOTES:// / v / v CONSTRUCT WATER SERVICE PER CITY / ���/ p 17+3 .' \ 8" DIP BEND I I STANDARD PLATE 2006 ON SHEET 5. / / 17+p 410 CONSTRUCT SEWER SERVICE PER CITY / / > I SMH 46 I I STANDARD PLATE 3004 ON SHEET 6. / SMH 49 _ > I 3 CONSTRUCT SANITARY MANHOLE PER CITY < HYDRANT AND 6 GATE 8" DIP BEND I I O I VALVE AND BOX I I STANDARD PLATE 3001 ON SHEET 6. / » (D) / 91-F 6" DIP I I / // p0 7 / SEE SHEET 5 „ � a � - Q 8"X6" DIP TEE I I / 8 DIP BEND / ° a _ v v ° / / I I /oo 20 J------------� / SMH 50 a d 8„ DIP ---------- f o BEND 7 „ 8" DIP BEND / V 8 DIP / I v a BEND / / a SMH 51 // I > / w SMH 21 �/ I m a 13+00 14+00 / — / — SMH ° 2� SMH 22 - / / ° � I I 13 ° I I o / CD V 1060 1 04... 48LF 8" PVC 33LF 8" PVC z 1..0.....3.....0. OR � N O� SDR35 ® 0.50% ` DR35 ® 0.50 �� s z 1040 N Cq O c0 °'• O.O N ....................................... . N.N� - 00 O NO d. O M OO I� O 1..._....0....._25. I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was o Lo^ 00W II ^ N^�LL; 040(nZ N 0^ N W _ 3 Z 1035 N N .... z V- %-..,-10 II � __ O C........................................ r- M. �I M M>> . = Z Nom— Z > N Z > Z rq NEZ Z 11 — N I, i z 1..0.....3.....0. OR � N O� . Q �� �� �� 0 O.O 0. U) z O.Ln Q 13 J 14 1..._....0....._25. I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was DESIGNED BY: � W � O z N � o O z 0 j 1......0......2 0 DRAWN BY: .. —0 11 MSS N I, DATE REVISION WP.E. o� N W 23461 TAE 00> n, O n Q 7.5' MIN. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . �. 146LF 8 PVC SDR35 ® 0..50% L O . . 0)0 . . M Lo 04 > N � Z O O \. LO `O 0) M II C) \ \ CD II 8„ DIP WA T, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ERYAIN :2 :2 > Z 0 SD rn o R35 ® � VC 2Q 0 O � c . . . . . . . . ^ . . . . . . O cn 74tr .8,; Lj �Oz �oPVC SDR3 72 N Z 6^� �% 0�3w . LO 0 (n Z . :22> > NFxZ Z 00 O Ln —.Wi OO .O .O 15 RUM RIVER 7PPo S& ENGINEERS ox 1044 Telephone: (763) 389-4476 eton, MN 55371 Fax: (763) 631-0376 00 N � 00 O.O O.O 16 SPIRIT HILLS SOUTH n 1055 1050 IQO� d - 'I ori d: MCN NN O 1045 6v"-0 O Boz 3 N Z >> .1040 .1........0.....35 P U I �— VC SDR35 . ® 1030 . 00 . . . . Lo 0 .1..._0.25 IN. O 'n N 14) N M O O.O O.O 1020 17 17 Iq SHEET SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN 20 OF BISON AVENUE 37 CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA SHEETS P-4367.01 N OR � N O� nM �� �� �� O.O O.O 0. U) O.� O.Ln 12 13 14 I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was DESIGNED BY: prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I CJJ am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State Minn ota. DRAWN BY: i �CAIGVIJOCHUM, MSS CHECKED BY: WP.E. Date 4/8/19 Lic. No. 23461 TAE O O \. LO `O 0) M II C) \ \ CD II 8„ DIP WA T, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ERYAIN :2 :2 > Z 0 SD rn o R35 ® � VC 2Q 0 O � c . . . . . . . . ^ . . . . . . O cn 74tr .8,; Lj �Oz �oPVC SDR3 72 N Z 6^� �% 0�3w . LO 0 (n Z . :22> > NFxZ Z 00 O Ln —.Wi OO .O .O 15 RUM RIVER 7PPo S& ENGINEERS ox 1044 Telephone: (763) 389-4476 eton, MN 55371 Fax: (763) 631-0376 00 N � 00 O.O O.O 16 SPIRIT HILLS SOUTH n 1055 1050 IQO� d - 'I ori d: MCN NN O 1045 6v"-0 O Boz 3 N Z >> .1040 .1........0.....35 P U I �— VC SDR35 . ® 1030 . 00 . . . . Lo 0 .1..._0.25 IN. O 'n N 14) N M O O.O O.O 1020 17 17 Iq SHEET SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN 20 OF BISON AVENUE 37 CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA SHEETS P-4367.01 I I I I BEGIN STREET CONSTRUCTION STA 0+45 0+�00 I I 0 z a J n z w w z Ew n N I� DATE ED N 00> 0n, �n n Q 1040 1035 1030 1025 1020 1015 1010 1005 0 REVISION i FES 67 i INV=1018.20 C 66 34' BACK TO BACK -- RP 1021.72 STREET (TYPICAL) _ J I Ca INjJ (NW)=1017.11 SEE SHEET 7 _--- INV '�/-27LF 15" RCP (CL 5) 0 0.50% I —I 1+00 — I 4— _I 2+00 I 4 >> ,c a d o a � � u s �7LF 15" RCP (CL 5) ® 3.00% 57 SF — 6" _ CONCRETE I \------------ WALK I r BEGIN SIDEWALK 12SF M I TRUNCATED CONSTRUCTION I I DOMES STA 0+97 N I I cn ICB 65 I wI M= 1021.76 I = NV (N)=1017.22 I cn I I I w I I .01 I I I I � I I I I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . N /O M It N �.� .� + O N co I-- c0 0 C /II 0 LO 0 0 O O qt H II p!�^n > -i II CL LLI FEZ Z Z n 20OLF 15" RCP (CL 5) ® 0.50% V � -I 3+00 �I MH 63 i I I 57 SF — 6" I CONCRETE WALK ' I I � I I 12SF TRUNCATED DOMES I CB 69 RIM= 1024.82-------- 'jT02J INV-fE1_.55 L — INV (S)=1.022.50 0 rri LO GG G G M I � I I I g 4+00 < I 32LF 15" RCP (CL 5) ® 3.00% CBMH 68 ° ° L=131.37 R=290.00 &=25'57'21, °V o A d . 4 . a.. — —� V 24SF __------------- TRUNCATED ---- f DOMES 6' WIDE - 4" I \ I CONCRETE WALK N I 126 SF - 6" (TYPICAL) SEE SHEET 8 I z I CONCRETE I WALK I ri I ri V I I I I I I I I I I I a I I a I� N O N^ O Ln N C; . O.Lo. M.. N N M Ni.N 0. 04 o.N t-0 t-0 o.N O � O � O � O � O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 2 1 hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was DESIGNED BY: prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I CJJ am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the StateMinn ota. DRAWN BY: MSS CHECKED BY: AI J. JOCHUM, P.E. Date 4/8/19 Lic. No. 23461 TAE '* OR��� � � O � uA 00�N�� MO000 O 000 N00— II ^^^^ V , II II N^� O MO�vZ V) =�Z V Z — Z Z — — Z Z FE Z F n 0 28LF 0 (CL 5) ® 3.00% ° _ o I '�/-27LF 15" RCP (CL 5) 0 0.50% I —I 1+00 — I 4— _I 2+00 I 4 >> ,c a d o a � � u s �7LF 15" RCP (CL 5) ® 3.00% 57 SF — 6" _ CONCRETE I \------------ WALK I r BEGIN SIDEWALK 12SF M I TRUNCATED CONSTRUCTION I I DOMES STA 0+97 N I I cn ICB 65 I wI M= 1021.76 I = NV (N)=1017.22 I cn I I I w I I .01 I I I I � I I I I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . N /O M It N �.� .� + O N co I-- c0 0 C /II 0 LO 0 0 O O qt H II p!�^n > -i II CL LLI FEZ Z Z n 20OLF 15" RCP (CL 5) ® 0.50% V � -I 3+00 �I MH 63 i I I 57 SF — 6" I CONCRETE WALK ' I I � I I 12SF TRUNCATED DOMES I CB 69 RIM= 1024.82-------- 'jT02J INV-fE1_.55 L — INV (S)=1.022.50 0 rri LO GG G G M I � I I I g 4+00 < I 32LF 15" RCP (CL 5) ® 3.00% CBMH 68 ° ° L=131.37 R=290.00 &=25'57'21, °V o A d . 4 . a.. — —� V 24SF __------------- TRUNCATED ---- f DOMES 6' WIDE - 4" I \ I CONCRETE WALK N I 126 SF - 6" (TYPICAL) SEE SHEET 8 I z I CONCRETE I WALK I ri I ri V I I I I I I I I I I I a I I a I� N O N^ O Ln N C; . O.Lo. M.. N N M Ni.N 0. 04 o.N t-0 t-0 o.N O � O � O � O � O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 2 1 hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was DESIGNED BY: prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I CJJ am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the StateMinn ota. DRAWN BY: MSS CHECKED BY: AI J. JOCHUM, P.E. Date 4/8/19 Lic. No. 23461 TAE '* OR��� � � O � uA 00�N�� MO000 O 000 N00— II ^^^^ — II , II II N^� O MO�vZ V) =�Z =�Z ��— Z — Z Z — — Z Z FE Z F n 0 28LF _ O 15'' RCP (CL 5) ® 3.00% o �1— Lo U oL -I d 7. cV R= 400.00 I A=25"57'21 »6+00 _ w V)so v N I A .d d °. d d I 1 --- I I I 1 1 I I GENERAL NOTE (SHEETS 21-27): 1. SEE SHE 31 -36 -FOR PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP DETAILS. I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I � 1 I I 1015 1010 04 NO Q O N � to 110. N N O 00 o N o N o N o N o N o N 0 0 0 0 0 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1005 3 4 5 5 RUM RIVER STREET AND STORM SEWER armsURv oRs-E"'C CRs SPIRIT HILLS SOUTH WILDWOOD BOULEVARD PO Box 1044 Telephone: (763) 389-4476 Princeton, MN 55371 Fax: (763) 631-0376 CITY OF M O N T I C E L LO, MINNESOTA SHEET 21 37 SHEETS P-4367.01 q L 1 I 1 / -----' L -- --------- ------- N h / 0000 / ori / 81 00 d�•57'21»6+00 CL — / I I — / I I I I I o — o PT = 11 98.744 / 34' BACK TO BACK / STREET (TYPICAL) / SEE SHEET 7 / --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - L --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - atk�- -i L - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 7 / '_7 // V vz LO Q o �� 00 rt, Q-�ro CB 91 r II LA U �`$+00 �/ J 9+00 10+00 1 1+ SO Lon o In MH 89 MH 88 / u >> >> >> >> >> >> >> a� w _ d \ / p n n n / - 61-F 15" RCP (CL 5) ® -1. 0% 1 44-------- — ---------J /--------------1 ----------------- ---1 r------------------ ---�----------------- / 6' WIDE - 4" CONCRETE CB 90 I I 1 RIM=1025.83 I I WALK (TYPICAL) INV (N)=1021.77 SEE SHEET 8 I I 1 I CD 1..040.. 150' VC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1040 O o HIGH POINT ELEV = 1030.48 U') + Mo HIGH POINT STA = 6+89.51 O cd PVI STA = 7+15+ o 1035II II PVI ELEV = 1031.23 � ,n co 1035 ........................................ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .A.D. 4.53%. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ......................................... LO v v K = 33.10 II II PROPOSED GRADE Cv 00 cV m m U U �O 00 o N W W C-4 cow II 1.0.30... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . � ...... 0 —. rn II.. ��z.�w 1030 �> II > ��z =M> z > (n z - z °' rn - + o O .._1...0.2.5..... .......... ..................... ................... 1025 � � 3.04% (n W M m , ..1..020.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . LF 1 . . . . . . . . . . . \ . ......................................... LF 15' RCP 226 1020 \ EXISTING GRADE (CL 5) ® 1.50% 8 RCP (CL 5) ®o 2.75/ 1015 1015 z Q J z CY w w z cD Ez n o! N O N I-� DATE o� N W 00> n, o n Q 1 ........................................ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . p . . to T- co ^ 1".. N M N rn N00 N� d d Nao o o.0 o.0 o.0 o.� o.� 1005 d p 7 8 REVISION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was DESIGNED BY: prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I CJJ am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State Minn ota. DRAWN BY: i �CAIGVI MSS ` JOCHUM, P.E. CHECKED BY: d — / I I — / I I I I I o — o PT = 11 98.744 / 34' BACK TO BACK / STREET (TYPICAL) / SEE SHEET 7 / --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - L --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - atk�- -i L - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 7 / '_7 // V vz LO Q o �� 00 rt, Q-�ro CB 91 r II LA U �`$+00 �/ J 9+00 10+00 1 1+ SO Lon o In MH 89 MH 88 / u >> >> >> >> >> >> >> a� w _ d \ / p n n n / - 61-F 15" RCP (CL 5) ® -1. 0% 1 44-------- — ---------J /--------------1 ----------------- ---1 r------------------ ---�----------------- / 6' WIDE - 4" CONCRETE CB 90 I I 1 RIM=1025.83 I I WALK (TYPICAL) INV (N)=1021.77 SEE SHEET 8 I I 1 I CD 1..040.. 150' VC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1040 O o HIGH POINT ELEV = 1030.48 U') + Mo HIGH POINT STA = 6+89.51 O cd PVI STA = 7+15+ o 1035II II PVI ELEV = 1031.23 � ,n co 1035 ........................................ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .A.D. 4.53%. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ......................................... LO v v K = 33.10 II II PROPOSED GRADE Cv 00 cV m m U U �O 00 o N W W C-4 cow II 1.0.30... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . � ...... 0 —. rn II.. ��z.�w 1030 �> II > ��z =M> z > (n z - z °' rn - + o O .._1...0.2.5..... .......... ..................... ................... 1025 � � 3.04% (n W M m , ..1..020.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . LF 1 . . . . . . . . . . . \ . ......................................... LF 15' RCP 226 1020 \ EXISTING GRADE (CL 5) ® 1.50% 8 RCP (CL 5) ®o 2.75/ 1015 1015 z Q J z CY w w z cD Ez n o! N O N I-� DATE o� N W 00> n, o n Q 1 ........................................ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . to T- co ^ 1".. N M N rn N00 N� NO NO N� Nao o o.0 o.0 o.0 o.� o.� 1005 5 6 7 8 REVISION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was DESIGNED BY: prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I CJJ am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State Minn ota. DRAWN BY: i �CAIGVI MSS ` JOCHUM, P.E. CHECKED BY: Date 4/8/19 Lic. No. 23461 TAE a o N o.0 RUM RIVER (�S 7PPo S& ENGINEERS ox 1044 Telephone: (763) 389-4476 eton, MN 55371 Fax: (763) 631-0376 ;1010 0 00co to W 10 110.0 o L0 N�N N N N T o.N 0. C4 o.N o.N o O O O O O 1005 9 10 11 STREET AND STORM SEWER SPIRIT HILLS SOUTH WILDWOOD BOULEVARD CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA SHEET 22 37 SHEETS P-4367.01 11 I I I C\ RI INV (NE '101 I 16LF�15" FCP (CL 5) 1® 2.50% i / / / / / / / / / 1035 1030 d "t V I 1 n \ I 1 I 11 -z� 11 I >EE SHEET 22 0 1 57 SF - 6" CONCRETE WALK 1 \ G 1 CB 101 I I +CB 87 I 1 88 1 -PC 1+05--4. RIM=1018.61 1 1 1 11 RIM=1040.03 I 1 INV (SE) -1014.36 I 1 CB 97 1 L - - INV (SW)=1031.61 1 34' BACK TO BACK 1 = RIM _1034_30 - - - - 12SF - - - - - - 26LF 15" RCP (CL 5) @ 1.30% I L----------------------- -<<- - ----J L-- ---------- ------- STREET (TYPICAL) INV (E)=1031.16 TRUNCATED ' « - - - - SEE SHEET 7 DOMES V ply M _ 26LF 15" RCP (CL 5) ® -7.23% V 0 V ` `0 I I / L MH 5 I I I I I I I 16400 I I W ► UI 15+00 c _ I - w II - �- 14+00 c I c < I < < L=87.94 N- o -I 17+00 0 1°2+00 13+00 c I < I c c I < - K=t 15.54 - < --E+- _ I - MH 94 « « (QMH 8 « °=g'3�0'31" W < MH 92 « « « << I << << -- - - a ,. Q A _ 7�/ 12SF TRUNCATED DOMES ----------� -1 - - - - - - - 1 I 6' WIDE - 4" CONCRETE 136 SF - 6" CONCRETE WALK I I WALK (TYPICAL) I I SEE SHEET 8 I I I - I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I LOW POINT ELEV = 1018.65 .LOW .POINT S.TA. =. 11+63.77. 0 1035 Lam PVI STA = 12+20 't LO PVI ELEV = 1015.90 /_ + N A.D. = 11.04% K = 22.65 ' II 1030 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .250' .VC . . . . . . . . . . . . �. . . . . . cv I- vi / PROPOSED GRADE w w -,% O rn aoO O DE O EXISTING GRA/ ori � rri Ki ,f' `� � � 1025 1025. �. o . 0 . . . o 0 0 O . . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .-------- rn 11 cow r--, o T- 04Q 06 11 II II II II II %-.0'-% 00 �I �� _^ HOZ N z (W co 0^� = 1020 E z z o0 II %_1 %--., 1-1 > > N �. (n / M Lr - �i 100` rn 0 � N N O M C6 O N II II N 1015 - �. i �. 38LF 18" RCP O II> 0 13 (CL 5) ® 1.U0 100 1 hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was DESIGNED BY: ry and that 1 CJJ 0 Professional Engineer under the laws z of the State Minn ota. ' n 1-1 CD 995 z r o LO N w Z co � � � � � O Z E L'j 990 0 ------ N� 11 �Q0 t DATE oI- N W F-- 00> -,% O rn aoO O DE O EXISTING GRA/ ori � rri Ki ,f' `� � � 1025 1025. �. o . 0 . . . o 0 0 O . . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .-------- rn 11 cow r--, o T- 04Q 06 11 II II II II II %-.0'-% 00 �I �� _^ HOZ N z (W co 0^� = 1020 E z z o0 II %_1 %--., 1-1 > > N �. (n / M Lr - �i 100` rn 0 � N N O M C6 O N II II N 1015 - �. i �. 38LF 18" RCP O II> 0 13 (CL 5) ® 1.U0 100 1 hereby certify that this plan, specification, or 1010 --- . . . . REVISION O46LF 18 RCP (CL 5) ® 2.00% 0 n -W W.rn O.O O.O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 1020 279LF 18 RCP (CL 5) ® 1.93% -------1015 1010 100` 1000 A 61-F 15" RCP (CL 5) ® 1.94%-/ ------7 I I I I I � - I I I I I I I I 4 O 0 Lr) L0 0 M 04 �i 100` rn 0 � N N O M C6 O N II II N O �. i �. 990 CD II> 0 13 13 1000 1 hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was DESIGNED BY: ry and that 1 CJJ 0 Professional Engineer under the laws z of the State Minn ota. ' n 1-1 CD 995 z r o LO N w Z co � � � � � O Z E L'j 990 0 ------ N� 11 �Q0 t DATE oI- N W F-- 00> Dry �n Q� Q REVISION O46LF 18 RCP (CL 5) ® 2.00% 0 n -W W.rn O.O O.O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 1020 279LF 18 RCP (CL 5) ® 1.93% -------1015 1010 100` 1000 A 61-F 15" RCP (CL 5) ® 1.94%-/ ------7 I I I I I � - I I I I I I I I 1055 1050 1045 1040 - � EXISTING GRADE 1035 1030 4 O 995 Lr) L0 ^ M 04 00 04 cfl rn N C O.cVOO.04 � N N O M C6 O N II II N O �. �. 990 rr)If II It z II> 0 13 13 1 hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was DESIGNED BY: prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that 1 CJJ am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State Minn ota. ' DRAWN BY: �LC MSS C AI J. HUM, P.E. CHECKED BY: Date 4/8/19 Lic. No. 23461 TAE 1055 1050 1045 1040 - � EXISTING GRADE 1035 1030 -4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - � CB 96 j -RIM=1034.30 I INV (W)=1030.20 I I I 1 1 I I i I I I I I I I I I I I HIGH POINT ELEV = 1040.07 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .HIGH . POINT STA = 1.5+65. . . . . . . . PVI STA = 15+15 PVI ELEV = 1039.50 A.D. _ -6.86% K = 14.57 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .100' VC. ®M 1025 PROPOSED GRADE 1020 1015 0 O O.O 1010 �. .� 13 14 RUM RIVER 4 LAND SURVEYORS & ENGINEERS PO Box 1044 Telephone: (763) 389-4476 Princeton, MN 55371 Fax: (763) 631-0376 4 O F II N4 II Lr) L0 A to + h -4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - � CB 96 j -RIM=1034.30 I INV (W)=1030.20 I I I 1 1 I I i I I I I I I I I I I I HIGH POINT ELEV = 1040.07 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .HIGH . POINT STA = 1.5+65. . . . . . . . PVI STA = 15+15 PVI ELEV = 1039.50 A.D. _ -6.86% K = 14.57 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .100' VC. ®M 1025 PROPOSED GRADE 1020 1015 0 O O.O 1010 �. .� 13 14 RUM RIVER 4 LAND SURVEYORS & ENGINEERS PO Box 1044 Telephone: (763) 389-4476 Princeton, MN 55371 Fax: (763) 631-0376 O 0 O UJ U-) O O F II N4 II Lr) L0 to + Lr; M 00 04 O O UA � LO M N 6 CS N II II d. 0 0. 0- (N w rr)If II It z II> 0 > m Uj > > ��z z O 0 O UJ U-) O d O00 o 0 o F II N4 II 00 z N > > A 4 V Q 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 I HIGH POINT ELEV = 1040.42 HIGH POINT .STA = .16+2.1.34. 1055 PVI . STA = 16+45 PVI ELEV = 1040.98 A.D. _ -3.33% K = 45.10 1050 150' VC 1045 > > ME z z z 1,14% 11040 0 gLF 15" RCP. (CL 9 5 15 SPIRIT HILLS SOUTH co-� N � j .4 0; M O O O O 16 STREET AND STORM SEWER WILDWOOD BOULEVARD CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA 1030 1025 1020 1015 d' d, O Or 1010 16 SHEET 23 37 SHEETS P-4367.01 0) n n Q 0 Q 0 ry i 0 i 0 z Q ry 0 z Q n 0 z it w w Z_ C7 Z E W o N � I � I o� N W OCT> Dry L n Q,,- Q Y 1 DATE REVISION 1050 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .>_ 00 O M + M I1- O 1045 N w / W W ` M II II D o w N^ 1040 \ .. EXISTING GRADE 1035 1030 1025 1020 M n M 2 27 4L 15" RCP (CL 5) CSD .��.� 34' BACK TO BACK STREET (TYPICAL) SEE SHEET 7 END STREET CONSTRUCTION / STA 20+25 WpOD WAY * ��0 \ L / r � / END SIDEWALK CONSTRUCTION ` STA 20+25 00 00 00 0 O) O MN N O a? N Imo' 00 O KjN N •o O O C4 to N + M M II II D o w N^ M II EXISTING GRADE N M O.O r PROPOSED GRADE II 17 Z J L UEZ O—Z U W— N w �� -2.19% > w . . . . . . . . . F1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .a w _ .F 1 199 RCP 3 "5 1 � (CL 5) '?.00% (Cl ) M 00 0 O N' ^ 00' (p Imo' I M M O.O r O.O r O.O r O.O r 17 18 1 hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was DESIGNED BY: prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I CJJ am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State Minn ota. DRAWN BY: i MSS C AI ` J. JOCHUM, P.E. CHECKED BY: Date 4/8/19 Lic. No. 23461 TAE 19 RUM RIVER (4 LA7PP SURVEYORS & ENGINEERS ox 1044Telephone: (763) 389-4476 eton, MN 55371 Fax: (763) 631-0376 15 N o.0 o.0 r � 20 SPIRIT HILLS SOUTH L � / 1050 1040 1035 1030 1025 1020 1015 21 STREET AND STORM SEWER WILDWOOD BOULEVARD CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA SHEET 24 37 SHEETS P-4367.01 I i I 1 I I I II 57 SF 6" CONCRETE WALKI I I� v I CB 72 v I RIM=1025.88 I INV (E)=1022.00 12SF I < - I-------- CB 62 I I 34' BACK TO BACK TRUNCATED I -RIM= 1012.41 I _ - - I 1 STREET (TYPICAL) DOMES _ J ` ° v 26LF RCP (CL 5) ® 3.00% L - I INV (E)=1008.09_________j �--- SE-E-S+fEEfi�--- \ BEGIN STREET L_-- CONSTRUCTION- L \ STA 0+71 - o -----� v 26LF 15" RCP CL 5 ® 6.00% -'� `bpi ( ) + l +�r I I I V' 4+00 R=225.0 3+00 o I < _ > )! (o + / I04 85.54 �- /` I 2+00 MH 73 Q- - � � `MH 70 << « 5 00 ., 6+00 =250.00 °- < — i — MH 63 o I L= 1.46 I v 1 +00, < < CBMH 1 15 « _ R=1'75.00 N 4=19'36 —{- - _ 0 — << EX. MH 5 « « « « ................. 6LF 15" RCP CL 5) ® 3.0 /� C �r� - 564 ;� w MH 60 «_ N . 4 MH 75 jib, i MH 74 IMA a G �P a _CB 71------- 4 ° 4 p p ° G BUR 4 4 - R� RIM=1025.88 G - o INV (W)=1022.00 _ ° 4 G - 6LF 15 RCP (CL 5) CSD 6.00/--------- I °p I �� ------------------� �- 24SF I BEGIN SIDEWALK CB 1 I TRUNCATED I 57 SF - 6" I DOMES I CONCRETE WALK 6' WIDE - 4" CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION -RIMS 1012.41 I I STA 0+68 INV 1(W)-1008.09 6 WIDE - 4 CONCRETE lily _ n I WALK (TYPICAL) I I I - WALK (TYPICAL) I I SEE SHEET 8 I I I \ SEE SHEET 8 - 12SF TRUNCATED DOMES I II II \ i 126 SF 6" CONCRETE WALK I o I I 1 I I I I I \ � 1035 HIGH POINT ELEV = 1025.32 1035 1045 1045 HIGH POINT STA = 3+15. / �. PVI STA = 2+40 - / 100' VC N N PVI ELEV = 1024.50 A.D. _ -7.29% - / LOW POINT ELEV =. 1025.59 rn o No 1030 K = 20.59 1030 1040 LOW POINT STA = 3+40 Lo 1040 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . / . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PVI STA = 3+90 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,,� II I.I . . . . . . o . . . . . . 150' VC / PVI ELEV = 1026.14 O 't z N B.0 o/O N A.D. = 6.91 % ,n L + o PROPOSED GRADE > > K = 14.48 O O + 0 _- Lo 00 z z 1025 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ± o . . . . . . . . . . � . . . . . _ 1025 1035 N . . . . LO . .N .N o . . . . . . .. o . li . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1035 O N W II II / J L �o u7 (n �! CO rn rn NII II 00 N O O�� i N w + O + O �N N N N M�Z N W W �. 0 0 M M 00 00 O I I v v 1020 M °° °° 1020 1030 II II N o•^^ Z %� . ? ? . 1 g°° . RSP . . . . . . . -1030 � O O O �o v v v v _ 49L5 3,50 + O LOO o• o o >> m m m>>>> (CL ® O o+ o N II II • II II PROPOSED GRADE W W :2-z z z z L 5) (� 3.50% - 0 0 0 3 W; z c i _.. LF 18" RCP (C ' 1015 II (O II 1015 1025 1.09/ f 82 _ — II . _ z z z z B•3$o� EXISTING GRADE � . F 24" RCP 61 LF 18 0 . 1025 M N > M E _ -.- - 47L ,L (moo o (moo Q G - �oo� o W O (o O O N O o� 1010 1010 1020 ;M^^^. 1020 RCP O QO (o N 42LF 24 ^. CY) CD I I K; M 1 LF 24 CL 5) (CL 5 ► CSD 1.75% 0 „ RCP ( rn (o O =• � > > > Cn 0 18 M•- Z Z Z z 1005 0 1005 1015 — 1015 Q`OMI II I /. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .coo O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . o =OZ N RCP o �N^^ �� ^ O ozN oor,r z II _ � CL 5) �. 2'7 5 n zz mm» L00000 1000 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . �. z ? . 1000 1010 �. it it it 1010 . co . Ln . 00 O O N w 0 ^ I� �n O C9 00 O?. LA M O w Z (/) 00 ^ �`� 0 O?. . 01 ? C7 w O ca O r, (D cO (0 C 0) z o — �.N �.0 N.O N.M M 0 M II �.� �.^ It. �.� �n.0 n N o o o o N o N o N o N 2 m>>>> o N o N o M o M o M o� z .0 �.0 �.0 —.O O O Z Z Z Z —.O �.O —.O �.O �.O —0 w 995 995 1005 1005 coo N 0 1 2 3 3 4 5 6 DATE REVISION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was DESIGNED BY: SHEET prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I STREET AND STORM SEWER �77 7D - am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws CJJ 25 LiJ of the State Minn ota. DRAWN �SS RUM RINER SPIRIT HILLS SOUTH °F 00 > LAND SURVEYORS & ENGIIVEERS O Fy PO Box 1044 Telephone: (763) 389-4476 BISON AVENUE Q� �CAI .J. JOCHUM, P.E. CHECKED BY: Princeton, MN 55371 Fax: (763) 631-0376 CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA 37 Q Y Date 4/8/19 Lic. No. 23461 TAE SHEETS P-4367.01 z Q J / z CY w w z c� Ez n (n N O N I-� I � o / N W 00> n, O n Q / IN, / IN, I I I I I I I I I 1065 1...0.. 6.0... EXISTING GRADE 1........0.....55.... . 105.0 1045 1040 ........................................ 1035 WE 6+.1 1.-9,3 0 0y SEE SHEET 25 s PROPOSED GRADE RCP (CL 5) 0 3.50 1..._03.0 F 1$ M O CY) N M (G 1025 6 DATE REVISION v I ' I f I I ' I a o I 200' VC . . . . . . . . HIGH POINT ELEV = 1056.26 HIGH POINT STA = 8+48.10 PVI STA = 7+85 PVI ELEV = 1057.74 . . . ... . . . A.D. = -9.81% . . . . . . . . K = 20.39 J c *00 cc MH 80 CB 83 RIM -105 85 / ° \ INV (SW )= 48.7// a / a E B `� 34' BACK TO BACK �� °• °° • / STREET (TYPICAL) N o°° SEE SHEET 7 ��\ 71 MH 1 \ CB 82 �\ �6LF 115" RCP (CL 0 5.00% / / RIM= 1052.85 \ / / I V (NE)=1048.73 / 61-F 15" RC (CL 5) 0 5.0 a I / I / / / / I PRC = / / I 1 +33. 7 i SEE SHEET 27 I / ■ s M 100 VC ... . . . . . 0). ... . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.._0.65 U-) Ui + o 00 LOW POINT ELEV = 1053.22 0 00 00 ,� LOW POINT STA = 10+71.90 00 K? II II + o PVI STA = 10+48 + \ ELEVPVI 18 o O cn w _1..._0.6.0 A.D. = .2.45% . K = 4.0.83 II II W L CO + rn O LQ V) C14 MO M (O C) C) / 6' 11 0, O II — LI I I o II (D z (n ^�zV)� Li '�- _—> > > > >> . . . . . . . 9 PROPOSED GRADE RCP (CL 5) 0 3.50 1..._03.0 F 1$ M O CY) N M (G 1025 6 DATE REVISION v I ' I f I I ' I a o I 200' VC . . . . . . . . HIGH POINT ELEV = 1056.26 HIGH POINT STA = 8+48.10 PVI STA = 7+85 PVI ELEV = 1057.74 . . . ... . . . A.D. = -9.81% . . . . . . . . K = 20.39 J c *00 cc MH 80 CB 83 RIM -105 85 / ° \ INV (SW )= 48.7// a / a E B `� 34' BACK TO BACK �� °• °° • / STREET (TYPICAL) N o°° SEE SHEET 7 ��\ 71 MH 1 \ CB 82 �\ �6LF 115" RCP (CL 0 5.00% / / RIM= 1052.85 \ / / I V (NE)=1048.73 / 61-F 15" RC (CL 5) 0 5.0 a I / I / / / / I PRC = / / I 1 +33. 7 i SEE SHEET 27 I / ■ s M 100 VC ... . . . . . 0). ... . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.._0.65 U-) Ui + o 00 LOW POINT ELEV = 1053.22 0 00 00 ,� LOW POINT STA = 10+71.90 00 K? II II + o PVI STA = 10+48 + \ ELEVPVI 18 o O cn w _1..._0.6.0 A.D. = .2.45% . K = 4.0.83 II II . . . . . . . 4p1"F 15 5.00% C . . . . . „RCP (cu. 5) 4.00% . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72U 18 00 W FL. �(D O0 O Lui. Lr; M M O / M 00 0 O C) C) / 6' 11 rn 4.II ^ U-) II 3 0) C) /. . . . . . . . . ow �- ^�zV)� - �- '�- _—> > Fyz z — �Fxz z . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . ... 8 . . . . . . . 4p1"F 15 5.00% C . . . . . „RCP (cu. 5) 4.00% . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72U 18 00 W LOc0 MLO 0 U') 1- O0 O O 00 n O V) 00 O n M n Vi > > � O � O � O ... . . . 7 . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . ... 8 . . . . . . . 9 1 hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was DESIGNED BY: prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I CJJ RUM RIVER am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws SURVEYORS & ENGINEERS of the State Minn ota. BIS0N AVENUE DRAWN BY: ox 1044Telephone: (763) 389-4476 r7PPoet°°, MN 5537 Pax: (763) 631-0376 i �CAIGVI CITY OF M O N T I C E L LO, MINNESOTA MSS ` JOCHUM, P.E. CHECKED BY: Date 4/8/19 Lic. No. 23461 TAE 4LIA rz 06 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .LF 15" . RCP . . . . . ... .o 0 54 LF (CL 5) 3.50 % O Kim^� 0 s U-) W �v ) z ® 4.50'0 - i_ = n. > 15,E RCp (C1 5) z z z 1 gOLF LO W LOc0 MLO 0 U') 1- O0 O Wi n^ La _ II .. O V) M m \ > > -1.81 % A. 1025 4LIA rz 06 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .LF 15" . RCP . . . . . ... .o 0 54 LF (CL 5) 3.50 % O Kim^� 0 s U-) W �v ) z ® 4.50'0 - i_ = n. > 15,E RCp (C1 5) z z z 1 gOLF LO W M LA LOc0 MLO 0 U') 1- O0 O Wi n^ La _ II .. O V) V- 0o 11 � Lo.M o f =�>Z> M LO 1 0.....55 105.0 1035 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 ...................................... 00 N M ((p cC ^ (C 00p �A N M It.O Ln.� Ln.� o f o f o f Lo.M o f Lo Lo.M L o� o o M LO 1025 9 10 11 11 STREET AND STORM SEWER Iq SHEET 26 RUM RIVER SURVEYORS & ENGINEERS SPIRIT HILLS S 0 U T H BIS0N AVENUE °F ox 1044Telephone: (763) 389-4476 r7PPoet°°, MN 5537 Pax: (763) 631-0376 CITY OF M O N T I C E L LO, MINNESOTA 37 SHEETS P-4367.01 s— �� _ CBN H 100 1 >� RINI 1040.21 I I INV (NE)=1031.50 v n ' \ // i i / INV (S)=1031.40 v 00 33LF 15" RCP—(CL 5) 0 0.40% V 26 V \ SEE SN 3, 7 1 / / I I / v 1+3 C � 17+00 � 17+3 a —O CBMH 99 >' ° 7 M 98 ' 7 - — V \ a d \ 34' BACK TO BACK I I // // s� r' ° n I 1 v v STREET (TYPICAL) SEE SHEET 7----J ----------- / I j ���s3 C° V �' _ / 7 57 SF — 6" CONCRETE WALK — 'p �9 r_:/ N \ / I o _ a' c 1p0 ao V r� a /�� I Q loll oC14 0° / a 12SF TRUNCATED DOMES —j O '� 14+00 m a i a 13+00o0 S a ��� I I I 3 V I 1 3 i da 6' WIDE — 4" CONCRETE WALK (TYPICAL) I v l SEE SHEET 8' --------------------7 / 1 1065 1060 PROPOSED GRADE EXISTING GRADE O 175' VC Do— o—NLO rn HIGH POINT ELEV = 1055.04 + -4 HIGH POINT STA = 13+76.47 r� o PVI STA = 14+50 PVI ELEV = 1055.55 H ii A.D. = —8.01 cn w K = 21.86. M m . . . . . . . . . . . . r1-- n1......0........4....5..; n 1060 Ki. M 'It. 00 to 0 W 0 0000 0 06.4 (64 1040 ........................................ 0 0 0 0.0 CD 0.0 . . . . . . . . 12 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 4 . . . CD > Z: 1035 DESIGNED BY: LJ J W ........................................ prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I CJJ 0 1....05.0 z the laws J n + M o of the State Minn ota. 1030 DRAWN BY: ........................ o II z_ w M O 0N M Li z C'4 o N �' Ez ..1..045 o L%1025.. rn�z�� N................................ 23461 TAE N I� 11 670 R...........0.....4.....0 00% 2.00% DATE z z \ o� N 00 > 0n, n n Q 1035 PROPOSED GRADE EXISTING GRADE O 175' VC Do— o—NLO rn HIGH POINT ELEV = 1055.04 + -4 HIGH POINT STA = 13+76.47 r� o PVI STA = 14+50 PVI ELEV = 1055.55 H ii A.D. = —8.01 cn w K = 21.86. M m . . . . . . . . . . . . 00 0.0 LOW POINT ELEV = 1039.92 LOW POINT STA = 17+10 PVI STA = 16+35 PVI ELEV = 1041.92 . . . . . . . . . o A.D. 4.70%. LO O K = 31.91 / CD L 150' VC O / LO o\ + N W II II \ W W N W > > \M m 37/ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O � (D.-: 0.0 15 RUM RIVER LAND SURVEYORS & ENGIlNBERS PO Box 1044 Telephone: (763) 389-4476 Princeton, MN 55371 Fax: (763) 631-0376 00 L 'O 7 (? I-, � 00 0 0 0 0 16 SPIRIT HILLS SOUTH 1065 LO M r1-- 1060 Ki. r- p�j 'It. 00 to IN. O W 0 0000 M 06.4 (64 Cd 0.0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . . . . . . . . 12 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 4 . . . REVISION > I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was DESIGNED BY: LJ J W prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I CJJ 1....05.0 am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws + M o of the State Minn ota. O O" DRAWN BY: NOp rn� �I II II II o II i M O 0N MSS NII ` CAI J. JOCHUM, P.E. ..1..045 CHECKED BY: rn�z�� Date 4/8/19 Lic. No. 23461 TAE 00 0.0 LOW POINT ELEV = 1039.92 LOW POINT STA = 17+10 PVI STA = 16+35 PVI ELEV = 1041.92 . . . . . . . . . o A.D. 4.70%. LO O K = 31.91 / CD L 150' VC O / LO o\ + N W II II \ W W N W > > \M m 37/ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O � (D.-: 0.0 15 RUM RIVER LAND SURVEYORS & ENGIlNBERS PO Box 1044 Telephone: (763) 389-4476 Princeton, MN 55371 Fax: (763) 631-0376 00 L 'O 7 (? I-, � 00 0 0 0 0 16 SPIRIT HILLS SOUTH 1065 LO M 1060 Ki. + � 0000 rn M II o . . . . . . . ._..1...._055 � II N > > a- LJ J W O 1....05.0 N N + M o +Lo O � O O" O O O NOp rn� �I II II II o II -to ON coo M O 0N NII ^ ..1..045 w w rn�z�� M�> > z z w 670 R...........0.....4.....0 00% 2.00% :71 ? z z \ n �— 1035 . . . . . . . . . 491-1715" . . . RCP . . . . ........................................ �— L 5 ® 0.40% 1030 00 N O N N O 1.._0.25 17 17 SHEET STREET AND STORM SEWER 27 OF BISON AVENUE CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA 3 SHEEE TS P-4367.01 Iq I I I 1 I M < J < i 0 CD It i CD z < rr 0 L z J rz c� z it w w z CD �z n r1)� �o CD t DATE 0� 00 > on, �n n < 1070 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 11 1 1 1 I 1 1 < T X I I --------------------------------- I BEGIN TRAIL x----� / CONSTRUCTION II / STA 0+17 10' BITUMINOUS TRAIL— PER / PER CITY PLATE NO. I 5013 ON SHEET 8 I / II / 1 III #iA '� II � II #428 1 1 � II / II / II < II I II I IXI 1045 1040 ca LO 0 .1035. 0 REVISION PROPOSED GRADE 1.67% . F 15" RCP (CL 5) 2.50% 148E O O o ILO 00 U-) II 00 N F, m m > U E Z 1 (D 2 v 1 2 00 2+124 I 1 I \\—END TRAIL CONSTRUCTION STA 1+99 1 2 O I I n rn . co . . + in LO II � Z Q� rn . . . . >. L z J rz c� z it w w z CD �z n r1)� �o CD t DATE 0� 00 > on, �n n < 1070 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 11 1 1 1 I 1 1 < T X I I --------------------------------- I BEGIN TRAIL x----� / CONSTRUCTION II / STA 0+17 10' BITUMINOUS TRAIL— PER / PER CITY PLATE NO. I 5013 ON SHEET 8 I / II / 1 III #iA '� II � II #428 1 1 � II / II / II < II I II I IXI 1045 1040 ca LO 0 .1035. 0 REVISION PROPOSED GRADE 1.67% . F 15" RCP (CL 5) 2.50% 148E O O o ILO 00 U-) II 00 N F, m m > U E Z 1 (D 2 v 1 2 00 2+124 I 1 I \\—END TRAIL CONSTRUCTION STA 1+99 1 2 O M rn . co . . + LO II � rn . . . . >. > J � w EXISTING GRADE 1070 1065 emo f 1055 1045 O N O Ln O o 00 r co. �.� �.� ca. o.� o.� o.� o. O � O � O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1035 1 2 2 I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was DESIGNED BY: prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I CJJ am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the Stateq_AI nn ota. i DRAWN BY: MSS CHECKED BY: J. JOCHUM, P.E. Date 4/8/19 Lic. No. 23461 TAE 1 V < V v _ _MH 85 �I / / 1 � / I / / \ BEGIN TRAIL CONSTRUCTION \ STA 0+29 \ \ \ cn III U >> SMH 40 > > S / SMH 41 1035HIGH POINT ELEV = 1019.09 HIGH POINT STA = 0+30.40 PVI STA = 0+55.40 PVI ELEV = 1018.70 A.D. _ -7.42% 10' BITUMINOUS TRAIL— PER RAIL PER CITY PLATE N0. i 5013 ON SHEET 8 � i i i i i i 1030 0_ K - 6.74 50'. VC op- N O +O O O O + O � LO 1025II o . . II II II 000. �. + o N W U ULJ 0 > _j> > II II a w m m 1...020... .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _1.158% w w IL PROPOSED GRADE 1015 .................................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . \ o rn co Co rn d'MMUi N �9• 000 r�0000 0 .................................... .11 .11 06-11 o - � o z V) z \ Lo N Z � (n Co _ M z z> Z z EXISTING GRADE 1005 - �� — 0 i \» 253LF 24 RCP (CL 5) ® 1.7 1000 995 236LF. 8" PVC (CL 3)® 0.50% O .00CO (0 .00 o vi o 00 00 . rn.rn. 0 0.0 rn� rn� 985 0 1 -RUM RIVER LAND SURVEYORS & ENGIlNBERS PO Box 1044 Telephone: (763) 389-4476 Princeton, MN 55371 Fax: (763) 631-0376 SPIRIT HILLS SOUTH /EX. CB 8 RIM= 1002.94 INV (E)=999.34 END TRAIL CONSTRUCTION STA 2+66 LOW POINT ELEV = 1003.06 LOW POINT STA = 2+48.57 PVI. STA. _. 2+23.5.7 PVI ELEV = 1003.56 A.D. = 7.00% K = 7.14 ,00 . 50' VC rn +O r- O o N In II II � o �U N N N O M m II II II U U H II ILL! w w w � 0 �-2• �0% 00 co JZ' Orn 0) 0) M. 0 ��, I I X M> Z > w�Z — z 22-F 8" P1/C s (3L 3)® 0. 0% M M c0 M N NN N O O N (Op. �� O M O O� � o. o C:) o Kj O 0� I I 0 0 ��Z N C) C) ��Z N . .g:X> > . .MM> > . . 2 N�Z Z NFIR Z Z TRAIL PLAN OUTLOT A AND B TRAILS CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA X�• 1035 1030 1025 1020 1015 1010 1005 1000 995 ••1 985 3 SHEET 28 37 SHEETS P-4367.01 q n n Q ry 0 z z z w w i 0 CD CD z Q ry 0 z Q J n 1-110 z it w w z Ez n (! �o N I� DATE ED N 00 > on, �n n Q BEGIN TRAIL CONSTRUCTION STA 0+25 14" —*„ 0 REVISION 1040 1035 1030 1025 1020 1015 1010 1005 1� /o i I _ i FENNING AVENUE NE 1T FUTURE 10' BITUMINOUS TRAIL SEE CITY PLATE NO. 5013 ON SHEET 8 ---------------------i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I FES 67 CB 65 MH 64 CB 63 3+00 V I V 1� FUTURE 10' BITUMINOUS TRAIL SEE CITY PLATE NO. 5013 ON SHEET 8 SII �noo0wZ o� II II jl N^ II PVI ELEV = 1030.94 ^ ,n z o,�^^ ^ II o `` A.D. _ -3.70% CO II coo , z�� o z^ 25LF 15" RCP K = 17.11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . EXISTING GRADE . . . . . . . . . . . . . L) � z = M > > > `o II (CL 3) ® 4.30% MEZ Z. Z mm> > 0 E Z Z 7LF 15"RCP (CL 3) ® 3.00% co to * I' in W O N.4 .4.R O.O O.O o.O 1 2 1 hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was DESIGNED BY: prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I CJJ am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State Minn ota. LC DRAWN BY: MSS CHECKED BY: AI J. HUM, P.E. Date 4/8/19 Lic. No. 23461 TAE 0 o 0000 O Cd 0. C4 o 0 3 RUM RIVER LAND SURVEYORS & ENGIlNBERS PO Box 1044 Telephone: (763) 389-4476 Princeton, MN 55371 Fax: (763) 631-0376 27LF 15" RCP (CL 3) 0 0.50% co v� C) U-) N NCd C4 o.0 F" SPIRIT HILLS SOUTH 0 M o+uu w Lj >R. V I CB 106 ----------------- - F- I I I I I I I REFERENCE NOTES: I 1� THIS PROJECT INCLUDES CONSTRUCTION I OF THE SUBGRADE FOR THE TRAIL ONLY. I AGGREGATE BASE AND BITUMINOUS PAVING WILL BE CONSTRUCTED IN THE I FUTURE BY OTHERS. I I I I 1000 . . . . . . . . . . ......................................... 00 L? N O � O 995 5 TRAIL PLAN FENNING AVENUE TRAIL CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA SHEET 29 4- 37 SHEETS P-4367.01 q 0 O M Va V > r- ----------------------� O 00 Ldm I M Oo00 ^ , 00 Co d, 00 N j NNNN N 0 0 3 I V + I V M Co POINT ELEV = 1011.42 < N I I I I I � SII �noo0wZ o� II II jl N^ II PVI ELEV = 1030.94 ^ ,n z o,�^^ ^ II o `` A.D. _ -3.70% CO II coo , z�� o z^ 25LF 15" RCP K = 17.11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . EXISTING GRADE . . . . . . . . . . . . . L) � z = M > > > `o II (CL 3) ® 4.30% MEZ Z. Z mm> > 0 E Z Z 7LF 15"RCP (CL 3) ® 3.00% co to * I' in W O N.4 .4.R O.O O.O o.O 1 2 1 hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was DESIGNED BY: prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I CJJ am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State Minn ota. LC DRAWN BY: MSS CHECKED BY: AI J. HUM, P.E. Date 4/8/19 Lic. No. 23461 TAE 0 o 0000 O Cd 0. C4 o 0 3 RUM RIVER LAND SURVEYORS & ENGIlNBERS PO Box 1044 Telephone: (763) 389-4476 Princeton, MN 55371 Fax: (763) 631-0376 27LF 15" RCP (CL 3) 0 0.50% co v� C) U-) N NCd C4 o.0 F" SPIRIT HILLS SOUTH 0 M o+uu w Lj >R. V I CB 106 ----------------- - F- I I I I I I I REFERENCE NOTES: I 1� THIS PROJECT INCLUDES CONSTRUCTION I OF THE SUBGRADE FOR THE TRAIL ONLY. I AGGREGATE BASE AND BITUMINOUS PAVING WILL BE CONSTRUCTED IN THE I FUTURE BY OTHERS. I I I I 1000 . . . . . . . . . . ......................................... 00 L? N O � O 995 5 TRAIL PLAN FENNING AVENUE TRAIL CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA SHEET 29 4- 37 SHEETS P-4367.01 q O O M O O 00 M Oo00 ^ , 00 Co d, 00 N NNNN N Co � II II II + 0 M Co POINT ELEV = 1011.42 < N II � II Cn N N II ri o / / coo 1,0NHIGH HIGH POINT STA = 1+06.29 w w w a II / + o PVI STA = 0+87.24 CL w w w N 26% 8' ttoo V) PVI ELEV = 1010.30 J II II A.D. = -7.32/ PROPOSED GRADE_5.23i a w + Cd o (n Uj K = 5.19 M r-- 38' VC m� -2.00% FL II II W W o CQ N . O + O 00> > 0/- i _ o m m 63' VC 00 I I I I 6.51 0 I I s oo ov v N 00 °. O o0 W V) HIGH POINT ELEV = 1032.38 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . co to . . . � to . . . . . . . . . . HIGH POINT STA = 4+60:13 O ,>,, ,>,, 0 to rn N o N> PVI STA = 4+28.46 SII �noo0wZ o� II II jl N^ II PVI ELEV = 1030.94 ^ ,n z o,�^^ ^ II o `` A.D. _ -3.70% CO II coo , z�� o z^ 25LF 15" RCP K = 17.11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . EXISTING GRADE . . . . . . . . . . . . . L) � z = M > > > `o II (CL 3) ® 4.30% MEZ Z. Z mm> > 0 E Z Z 7LF 15"RCP (CL 3) ® 3.00% co to * I' in W O N.4 .4.R O.O O.O o.O 1 2 1 hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was DESIGNED BY: prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I CJJ am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State Minn ota. LC DRAWN BY: MSS CHECKED BY: AI J. HUM, P.E. Date 4/8/19 Lic. No. 23461 TAE 0 o 0000 O Cd 0. C4 o 0 3 RUM RIVER LAND SURVEYORS & ENGIlNBERS PO Box 1044 Telephone: (763) 389-4476 Princeton, MN 55371 Fax: (763) 631-0376 27LF 15" RCP (CL 3) 0 0.50% co v� C) U-) N NCd C4 o.0 F" SPIRIT HILLS SOUTH 0 M o+uu w Lj >R. V I CB 106 ----------------- - F- I I I I I I I REFERENCE NOTES: I 1� THIS PROJECT INCLUDES CONSTRUCTION I OF THE SUBGRADE FOR THE TRAIL ONLY. I AGGREGATE BASE AND BITUMINOUS PAVING WILL BE CONSTRUCTED IN THE I FUTURE BY OTHERS. I I I I 1000 . . . . . . . . . . ......................................... 00 L? N O � O 995 5 TRAIL PLAN FENNING AVENUE TRAIL CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA SHEET 29 4- 37 SHEETS P-4367.01 q 1T FUTURE 10' BITUMINOUS TRAIL SEE CITY PLATE NO. 5013 ON SHEET 8 O N W b+UU Ld N � I O N W N CB 106 << << << ------------------ � ----------------- I I I I I I j I I I n n J Q 0 z z z w i 0 co cn CD z Q ry 0 z a J n / 0 z w w z Ez n r! �o N I� DATE 0/ N 00 > on, �n n Q REVISION 1065 FENNING AVENUE NE 4— END TRAIL CONSTRUCTION CTA Qir,7 +82 X X REFERENCE NOTES: 1� THIS PROJECT INCLUDES CONSTRUCTION OF THE SUBGRADE FOR THE TRAIL ONLY. AGGREGATE BASE AND BITUMINOUS r PAVING WILL BE CONSTRUCTED IN THE FUTURE BY OTHERS. O M II II — 1* M to nco v) 0)N N to O� o N M o0 M^ 01 L O L N W It It It 04 o M II o M o.� o.11 o� o� o� O m> > O O O O O O O O 1025 U (rz z — — 5 6 7 8 9 I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was DESIGNED BY: prepared by me or am a duly Licensed under my direct supervision Professional Engineer under and that I the laws CJJ HIGH POINT ELEV = 1046.32 ota. DRAWN BY: MSS n� C_ AI Date 4/8/19 J. JOCHUM, P.E. Lic. No. 23461 CHECKED BY: TAE HIGH POINT STA = 7+29.14 HIGH POINT ELEV = 1045.13 1..-0.x.0... PVI STA 7+03 03 H + . VI ELEV 1048.35 P = = LOW POINT ELEV 1042.56 _ PVI STA - 9+33.05 A.D. _ -12.31% LOW POINT STA = 8+64.64 PVI ELEV = 1044.81 K 12.19 PVI STA = 8+67.43 A.D. _ -2.10% LOW POINT ELEV = 1035.77 PVI ELEV = 1041.76 K = 11.89 LOW POINT STA = 5+34.45 s 50' V ' A.D. = 8.67% 1...0.55... . . . . . . . . . . PVI . STA _ .5+71..99 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . N . . . . . . . . . . . K = 8.65 . . . . . . . . . 25' VC u-) M + PVI ELEV = 1037.48 '� � M_ LO r'o `n �. rn � A.D. = 3.74% + o rn 75' VC rn o � � II o K = 20.07 N N N M ro + o o� + o s PROPOSED GRADE II II + 0 N ................................... . . . . . . . . 75' VC . . . . . . . . . . . Q, N1050 Ln . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Co00 O � � II II . rn O 0 co o > > II II II II N W W II II N w 4� co 0 o II � II w W N W > > U >> 104 `n II II U U U m U m .0 W W 2 �Fj% ' ..................5.. M `n U U m m -0� = . .6 + o w w LA o � EXISTING GRADE 1040 ................................... .N U .W .. U � . M m - -- O � o o O M 1035 _................................. . _ O O N �f N � O (n m02 OMM 0 02 z 1030.. cooOO _. ..................... MT-— O M II II — 1* M to nco v) 0)N N to O� o N M o0 M^ 01 L O L N W It It It 04 o M II o M o.� o.11 o� o� o� O m> > O O O O O O O O 1025 U (rz z — — 5 6 7 8 9 I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was DESIGNED BY: prepared by me or am a duly Licensed under my direct supervision Professional Engineer under and that I the laws CJJ of the StateMinn ota. DRAWN BY: MSS n� C_ AI Date 4/8/19 J. JOCHUM, P.E. Lic. No. 23461 CHECKED BY: TAE RUM RIVER LAND SURVEYORS & ENGIlNBERS PO Box 1044 Telephone: (763) 389-4476 Princeton, MN 55371 Fax: (763) 631-0376 SPIRIT HILLS SOUTH 1065 1060 1055 1050 1045 1040 1035 1030 N N ori Ui 0.0 1025 10 TRAIL PLAN FENNING AVENUE TRAIL CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA SHEET 30 37 SHEETS P-4367.01 Iq n Q 0 III n 0 0 z i CD z Q ry 0 z Q J n z cy w w z z Ew C3 `�_ o �Q0 0-)� o� NW 00 > Dry �n n Q FLARE � FLARE BACK OF CURB FLOW LINE 0 0" 0" O1 FRONT OF GUTTER A PERPENDICULAR A� F F NON—WALKABLE OR S NON—WALKABLE OR WALKABLE SURFACE 4 4 WALKABLE SURFACE FLARE FLARE O O o„ o„ O O A� TIERED PERPENDICULAR C--*- 7 )� .. 0 0„ 0„ C PARALLEL �0 j H 0 CURB OR VAR. 4' 0" MIN_ CURB AND GUTTE RAMP REQUIRED LANDING 0.02 FT. /FT. MAX. o ° o > 0.05 FT. /FT. AND CONCRETE <_ 0.083 FT./FT PREFERRED WALK SECTION A— A PERPENDICULAR/TIERED/DIAGONAL CURB OR CURB AND GUTTER VAR. 4' n" MIN- 1/4" IN_1/4" R. RAMP REQUIRED LANDING 0.02 FT. /FT. MAX. CONCRETE > 0.02 FT. /FT. AND WALK <0.05 FT./FT PREFERRED REVISION: APPR VED: JANUARY 23, 2017 OPERATIONS ENGINEER SECTION B—B 4' 0" MIN. REQUIRED LANDING FAN 1/4" R. -- - - - -- CURB OR J 6 CURB AND GUTTER CONCRETE 0.02 FT./FT. MAX. WALK SECTION C— C PARALLEL/DEPRESSED CORNER STRAIGI- MAY E 0 3" 0 O 3 " IV FAN 10 MODIFIED FAN 10 USED WHEN RIGHT—OF—WAY IS CONSTRAINED 0" / I DEPRESSED CORNER STANDARD PLAN 5-297.250 NON—WALKABLE OR WALKABLE SURFACE 2% MAX. Li J W M J Q m W Y Q U < _j b- Q Z� Of 00 2% MAX. 8%-10% FLARE mi DIAGONAL 0» SHALL ONLY BE USED AFTER ALL P OTHER CURB RAMP TYPES HAVE BEEN EVALUATED AND DEEMED IMPRACTICAL 8%-10% FLARE NOTES: LANDINGS SHALL BE LOCATED ANYWHERE THE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ROUTE (PAR) CHANGES DIRECTION, AT THE TOP OF RAMPS THAT HAVE RUNNING SLOPES GREATER THAN 5.0%, AND IF THE APPROACHING WALK IS INVERSE GRADE GREATER THAN 2%. INITIAL CURB RAMP LANDINGS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITHIN 15' FROM THE BACK OF CURB, WITH 6' FROM THE BACK OF CURB BEING THE PREFERRED DISTANCE, ONLY APPLICABLE WHEN THE INITIAL RAMP RUNNING SLOPE IS OVER 5.0%. SECONDARY CURB RAMP LANDINGS ARE REQUIRED FOR EVERY 30" OF VERTICAL RISE WHEN THE LONGITUDINAL RUNNING SLOPE IS GREATER THAN 5.0%. CONTRACTION JOINTS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED ALONG ALL GRADE BREAKS WITHIN THE PAR. 1/4" DEEP VISUAL JOINTS SHALL BE USED AT THE TOPS OF CONCRETE FLARES ADJACENT TO WALKABLE SURFACES - ALL GRADE BREAKS WITHIN THE PAR SHALL BE PERPENDICULAR TO THE PATH OF TRAVEL. THUS BOTH SIDES OF A SLOPED WALKING SURFACE MUST BE EQUAL LENGTH. (EXCEPT AS STATED IN © BELOW. TO ENSURE INITIAL RAMPS AND INITIAL LANDINGS ARE PROPERLY CONSTRUCTED, LANDINGS SHALL BE CAST SEPARATELY. FOLLOW SIDEWALK REINFORCEMENT DETAILS ON SHEET 6 AND THE ADA SPECIAL PROVISIONS — PROSECUTION OF WORK (ADA). TOP OF CURB SHALL MATCH PROPOSED ADJACENT WALK GRADE. WHEN THE BOULEVARD IS 4' WIDE OR LESS, THE TOP OF CURB TAPER SHALL MATCH THE RAMP SLOPES TO REDUCE NEGATIVE BOULEVARD SLOPES FROM THE TOP BACK OF CURB TO THE PAR. ALL RAMP TYPES SHOULD HAVE A MINIMUM 3' LONG RAMP LENGTH. 4' MINIMUM WIDTH OF DETECTABLE WARNING IS REQUIRED FOR ALL RAMPS. DETECTABLE WARNINGS SHALL CONTINUOUSLY EXTEND FOR A MIN. OF 24" IN THE PATH OF TRAVEL. DETECTABLE WARNING TO COVER ENTIRE WIDTH OF SHARED—USE PATHS AND THE ENTIRE PAR WIDTH OF THE WALK. DETECTABLE WARNING SHOULD BE 6" LESS THAN THE PAR/TRAIL WIDTH. ARC LENGTH OF RADIAL DETECTABLE WARNINGS SHOULD NOT BE GREATER THAN 20 FEET. RECTANGULAR DETECTABLE WARNINGS SHALL BE SETBACK 3" FROM THE BACK OF CURB. RADIAL DETECTABLE WARNINGS SHALL BE SETBACK 3" MINIMUM TO 6" MAXIMUM FROM THE BACK OF CURB. O1 MATCH FULL HEIGHT CURB. 20 4' MINIMUM DEPTH LANDING REQUIRED ACROSS TOP OF RAMP. 30 3" HIGH CURB WHEN USING A 3' LONG RAMP, 4" HIGH CURB WHEN USING A 4' LONG RAMP. ® SEE SHEET 4 OF 6, TYPICAL SIDE TREATMENT OPTIONS, FOR DETAILS ON FLARES AND RETURNED CURBS, WHEN INITIAL LANDING IS AT FULL CURB HEIGHT. O DETECTABLE WARNINGS MAY BE PART OF THE 4' X 4' MIN. LANDING AREA IF IT IS NOT FEASIBLE TO CONSTRUCT THE LANDING OUTSIDE OF THE DETECTABLE WARNING AREA. © THE GRADE BREAK SHALL BE PERPENDICULAR TO THE BACK OF WALK. THIS WILL ENSURE THAT THE GRADE BREAK IS PERPENDICULAR TO THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL. (TYPICAL FOR ALL) 70 WHEN ADJACENT TO GRASS, GRADING SHALL ALWAYS BE USED WHEN FEASIBLE. V CURB, IF USED, SHALL BE PLACED OUTSIDE THE SIDEWALK LIMITS WHEN RIGHT OF WAY ALLOWS. WHEN ADJACENT TO PARKING LOTS, CONCRETE OR BITUMINOUS TAPERS SHOULD BE USED OVER V CURB TO REDUCE TRIPPING HAZARDS AND FACILITATE SNOW & ICE REMOVAL. ® A 7' MIN TOP RADIUS GRADE BREAK REQUIRED TO BE CONSTRUCTIBLE. O9 PAVE FULL WALK WIDTH. 10 "S" SLOPES ON FANS SHALL ONLY BE USED WHEN ALL OTHER FEASIBLE OPTIONS HAVE BEEN EVALUATED AND DEEMED IMPRACTICAL. 411e1:42191 THESE LONGITUDINAL SLOPE RANGES SHALL BE THE STARTING POINT. IF SITE CONDITIONS WARRANT, LONGITUDINAL SLOPES UP TO 8.3% OR FLATTER ARE ALLOWED. S INDICATES PEDESTRIAN RAMP — SLOPE SHALL BE BETWEEN 5.0% MINIMUM AND 8.3% MAXIMUM IN THE DIRECTION SHOWN AND THE CROSS SLOPE SHALL NOT EXCEED 2.0%. F INDICATES PEDESTRIAN RAMP — SLOPE SHALL BE GREATER THAN 2.0% AND LESS THAN 5.0% IN THE DIRECTION SHOWN AND CROSS SLOPE SHALL NOT EXCEED 2.0%. LANDING AREA — 4' X 4' MIN. (5' X 5' MIN. PREFERRED) DIMENSIONS AND MAX 2.0% SLOPE IN ALL DIRECTIONS. LANDING SHALL BE FULL WIDTH OF INCOMING PARS. X" CURB HEIGHT 1 OF 6 APPROVED: 1 —23-2017 MINNeSOTA REVISED: DEPARTMENT I OF ` TRANSPORTATION STATE DE N ENGINEER PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP DETAILS SHEET NO 31 OF 37 SH EETS n Q 0 III n 0 0 z CD z Q ry 0 z Q J n / 0 z cy w w z 0 z Ew 00 N �'o o / NW 00> o ry �n n Q WALKABLE SURFACE 0 OF 6 O � 2' MAX 0„ 10 j 099 ® S NON—WALKABLE ® SURFACE o• %G 7 5' MAX O 10 COMBINED DIRECTON AL O 10 O NON—WALKABLE SURFACE 5' MAX 0-1 0" O — O 0" 0 BACK OF CURB FLOW LINE FRONT OF GUTTER IF NON—CONCRETE BLVD. IS CONSTRUCTED AND IS LESS THAN 2' IN WIDTH AT TOP OF CURB TRANSITION, PAVE CONCRETE RAMP WIDTH TO ADJACENT BACK OF CURB. STANDARD ONE—WAY DI RECT ON AL O9 D" REVISION: APPR VED: JANUARY 23, 2017 OPERATIONS ENGINEER 0 RAMP NON—WALKABLE OR WALKABLE SURFACE BACK OF CURB U" FLOW LINE FRONT OF GUTTER IC7_l,l% 8% TO 10% SLOPE DIRECTONAL RAMP WALKABLE FARE o SLOPE 'ECTIONS \ nn A rnr I DETECTABLE WARNING PLACEMENT WHEN SETBACK CRITERIA IS EXCEEDED 12 ONE—WAY DIRECTIONAL W TH DETECTABLE WARN NG AT BACK OF CURB 1.0% MIN. s 2.0% M AX um --s VAR. RAMP p o.. a p o.. a o p o a o p •o.. a 4: .o. . 4 •a �� � a � �4 �0 4 � a 4 I � � a n • • 6" CONCRETE WALK 2.0%-3.0% GUTTER SLOPE SECTION D—D CURB FOR DIRECTIONAL RAMPS 14 Do - ; SLOPE ECTI ON S 6" CONCRETE WALK 3" MINIMUM CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE � I a � � . �. v a° Q . O ° Q ° a .°. a.•• o.a o.• a.• .o .a TYPICAL SIDEWALK SECTION WITHIN INTERSECTION CORNER NOTES: LANDINGS SHALL BE LOCATED ANYWHERE THE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ROUTE (PAR) CHANGES DIRECTION, AT THE TOP OF RAMPS THAT HAVE RUNNING SLOPES GREATER THAN 5.0%, AND IF THE APPROACHING WALK IS INVERSE GRADE. INITIAL CURB RAMP LANDINGS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITHIN 15' FROM THE BACK OF CURB, WITH 6' FROM THE BACK OF CURB BEING THE PREFERRED DISTANCE, ONLY APPLICABLE WHEN THE INITIAL RAMP RUNNING SLOPE IS OVER 5.0%. SECONDARY CURB RAMP LANDINGS ARE REQUIRED FOR EVERY 30" OF VERTICAL RISE WHEN THE LONGITUDINAL SLOPE IS GREATER THAN 5.0%. CONTRACTION JOINTS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED ALONG ALL GRADE BREAKS WITHIN THE PAR. 1/4" DEEP VISUAL JOINTS SHALL BE USED AT THE TOP GRADE BREAK OF CONCRETE FLARES ADJACENT TO WALKABLE SURFACES. ALL GRADE BREAKS WITHIN THE PAR SHALL BE PERPENDICULAR TO THE PATH OF TRAVEL. THUS BOTH SIDES OF A SLOPED WALKING SURFACE MUST BE EQUAL LENGTH. TO ENSURE INITIAL RAMPS AND INITIAL LANDINGS ARE PROPERLY CONSTRUCTED, LANDINGS SHALL BE CAST SEPARATELY. FOLLOW SIDEWALK REINFORCEMENT DETAILS ON SHEET 6 AND THE ADA SPECIAL PROVISION (PROSECUTION OF WORK). TOP OF CURB SHALL MATCH PROPOSED ADJACENT WALK GRADE. WHEN THE BOULEVARD IS 4' WIDE OR LESS, THE TOP OF CURB TAPER SHALL MATCH THE RAMP SLOPES TO REDUCE NEGATIVE BOULEVARD SLOPES FROM THE TOP BACK OF CURB TO THE PAR. ALL RAMP TYPES SHOULD HAVE A MINIMUM 3' LONG RAMP LENGTH. 4' MINIMUM WIDTH OF DETECTABLE WARNING IS REQUIRED FOR ALL RAMPS. DETECTABLE WARNINGS SHALL CONTINUOUSLY EXTEND FOR A MIN. OF 24" IN THE PATH OF TRAVEL. DETECTABLE WARNING TO COVER ENTIRE WIDTH OF SHARED—USE PATH AND THE ENTIRE PAR WIDTH OF THE WALK. DETECTABLE WARNING SHOULD BE 6" LESS THAN THE PAR/PATH WIDTH. ARC LENGTH OF RADIAL DETECTABLE WARNINGS SHOULD NOT BE GREATER THAN 20 FEET. RADIAL DETECTABLE WARNINGS SHALL BE SETBACK 3" MINIMUM TO 6" MAXIMUM FROM THE BACK OF CURB. SEE NOTES 10 8c 11 FOR INFORMATION REGARDING RECTANGULAR DETECTABLE WARNING PLACEMENT. O1 MATCH FULL CURB HEIGHT. O2 3" HIGH CURB WHEN USING A 3' LONG RAMP 4" HIGH CURB WHEN USING A 4' LONG RAMP. O 3" MINIMUM CURB HEIGHT (5.5' MIN. DISTANCE REQUIRED BETWEEN DOMES) 4" PREFERRED (7' MIN. DISTANCE REQUIRED BETWEEN DOMES). ® THE "BUMP" IN BETWEEN THE RAMPS SHOULD NOT BE IN THE PATH OF TRAVEL FOR COMBINED DIRECTIONAL RAMPS. IF THIS OCCURS MODIFY THE RAMP LOCATION OR SWITCH RAMP TO A FAN/DEPRESSED CORNER. O5 WHEN USING CONCRETE PAVED FLARES ON THE OUTSIDE OF DIRECTIONAL RAMPS, AND ADJACENT TO A WALKABLE SURFACE, DIRECTIONAL RAMP FLARES SHOULD BE USED. SEE THE DETAIL ON THIS SHEET. © GRADING SHALL ALWAYS BE USED WHEN FEASIBLE. V CURB, IF USED, SHALL BE PLACED OUTSIDE THE SIDEWAL LIMITS WHEN RIGHT OF WAY ALLOWS. WHEN ADJACENT TO PARKING LOTS, CONCRETE OR BITUMINOUS TAPERS SHOULD BE USED OVER V CURB TO REDUCE TRIPPING HAZARDS AND FACILITATE SNOW & ICE REMOVAL. O7 MAX. 2.0% SLOPE IN ALL DIRECTIONS IN FRONT OF GRADE BREAK AND DRAIN TO FLOW LINE. SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED INTEGRAL WITH CURB AND GUTTER. ® 8% TO 10% WALKABLE FLARE. O9 PLACE DOMES AT THE BACK OF CURB WHEN ALLOWABLE SETBACK CRITERIA IS EXCEEDED. 10 FRONT EDGE OF DETECTABLE WARNING SHALL BE SET BACK 2' MAXIMUM WHEN ADJACENT TO WALKABLE SURFACE, AND 5' MAXIMUM WHEN ADJACENT TO NON—WALKABLE SURFACE WITH ONE CORNER SET 3" FROM BACK OF CURB. A WALKABLE SURFACE IS DEFINED AS A PAVED SURFACE ADJACENT TO A CURB RAMP WITHOUT RAISED OBSTACLES THAT COULD MISTAKENLY BE TRAVERSED BY A USER WHO IS VISUALLY IMPAIRED. 11 RECTANGULAR DETECTABLE WARNINGS MAY BE SETBACK UP TO 9" FROM THE BACK OF CURB WITH CORNERS SET 3" FROM BACK OF CURB. IF 9" SETBACK IS EXCEEDED USE RADIAL DETECTABLE WARNINGS. 12 FOR DIRECTIONAL RAMPS WITH THE DETECTABLE WARNINGS PLACED AT THE BACK OF CURB, THE DETECTABLE WARNINGS SHALL COVER THE ENTIRE WIDTH OF THE WALK/PATH. THIS ENSURES A DETECTABLE EDGE AND HELPS ELIMINATE THE CURB TAPER OBSTRUCTING THE PATH OF PEDESTRIAN TRAVEL. 13 THE CONCRETE WALK SHALL BE FORMED AND CONSTRUCTED PERPENDICULAR TO THE BACK OF CURB. MAINTAIN 3" BETWEEN EDGE OF DOMES AND EDGE OF CONCRETE. 14 TO BE USED FOR ALL DIRECTIONAL RAMPS, EXCEPT WHERE DOMES ARE PLACED ALONG THE BACK OF CURB. ml STANDARD PLAN 5-297.250 LEGEND THESE LONGITUDINAL SLOPE RANGES SHALL BE THE STARTING POINT. IF SITE CONDITIONS WARRANT, LONGITUDINAL SLOPES UP TO 8.3% OR FLATTER ARE ALLOWED. s INDICATES PEDESTRIAN RAMP — SLOPE SHALL BE BETWEEN 5.0% MINIMUM AND 8.3% MAXIMUM IN THE DIRECTION SHOWN AND THE CROSS SLOPE SHALL NOT EXCEED 2.0%. F INDICATES PEDESTRIAN RAMP — SLOPE SHALL BE GREATER THAN 2.0% AND LESS THAN 5.0% IN THE DIRECTION SHOWN AND CROSS SLOPE SHALL NOT EXCEED 2.0%. LANDING AREA — 4' X 4' MIN. (5' X 5' MIN. PREFERRED) DIMENSIONS AND MAX 2.0% SLOPE IN ALL DIRECTIONS. LANDING SHALL BE FULL WIDTH OF INCOMING PARS. X" CURB HEIGHT 2 of 6 PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP DETAILS APPROVED: 1 -23-2017 1NI eSOTAK__REVISED: DEPARTMENT r�r� Y OF ` TRANSPORTATION STATE DE N ENGINEER SHEET NO 32 OF 37 SHEETS FRONT OF GUTTER INSET A ® 0 �1/4" F LOW LINE 2-5� c o 24" 8-12" c, A 7" ►- -, ,- PERPENDICULAR ( INSET B VAR. RAMP 6" CONCRETE WALK INSET A FRONTOF UTTER O BACK OF CURB/ 4 7 EDGE OF WALK 1 /4" FLOW LINE 0 _ 2-3% 0 0 .o o o. o .:°. o 24" 8-12" PROJECTED BACK OF CURB/ --FRONT OF GUTTER FLOW LINE 1 /4" EDGE OF WALK 1 4" O 0 5% MAX- + / — u D• ° D p ° 'o � .0 '0 0 0 'o o ' z Q J i 0 z cy w w z z Ew U% N � 6� REVISION: i � APPR VED: JANUARY 23, 2017 co> 0 Q OPERATIONS ENGINEER 24" INSET B OUTFLOW GUTTER 8-12" 1 20' MAX. RECOMMENDEC TO NOT AFFECT PARKIN HOLD TANGENT 5' PAST OUTSIDE ZERO 1:3 MIN. TAPER (DOWNSTREAM SIDE)— INSET A FRONT OF GUTTER BACK OF CURB/ ®O7 FLOW LINE EDGE OF WALK � 1 /4" 0 ® 3% ° °. o . 0 0 •o 24" 8-12" NON PERPENDICULAR ( PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ROUTE CURB & GUTTER DETAIL 1/4" MIN. TO 1/2" MAX. p •a •0 .4 • a.: 4 : •a :o .a• a.: 4 : v :� . . .D• o .D• 0..0. o . N SET A 1:3 MIN. TAPER 1:5 PREFERRED TAPER (UPSTREAM SIDE) HOLD TANGENT 5' PAST OUTSIDE ZERO ADA CURB EXTENSION WITH COMPOUND RADIUS (BUMP OUT)>> DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC s MAIN STREET MILL VERTICAL EDGE EXISTING BIT. PAVEMENT FOR CURB MACHINE PLACEMENT AROUND RADIUS (REGARDLESS OF RAMP TYPE) 2" BITUMINOUS MILL & PATCH o o. .'o o 0' .0 ' o .0 4 °• 4. o. 4 °. 4. o. 4 °, 4. a Q °• 4. o Q °• 4. a 4 0 4• .v o. 4 0. 4, .v o. 4 'v 4• .a o. 4 Q. 4• 4'pa 4'°.. Q•°o. Q•a.. Q•°o. Q•a.. Q•°o. Q•a.. Q•°a. Q•° p �• o, n o_ D• p 0 o �I 24"MIN. BACK OF CURB/ EDGE OF WALK 1/4't �° �� 13o'o'D•°�: 0 0 ° ° 0 z Lo 6„ �I OPTIONAL SILL CURB WHEN SIDEWALK IS AT BACK OF CURB CONCRETE SILL TO BE USED ONLY WHEN SPECIFIED IN THE PLAN. SAWCUT BIT. PAVEMENT O & EXISTING BIT. REMOVE & REPLACE PAVEMENT I BIT. PAVEMENT ,o •o o ,o 24"MIN. SAWCUT SAWCUT BIT. VARIABLE DEPTH CONCRETE PAVEMENT PAVEMENT CONCRETE BASE EXISTING EXISTING BIT.CONCR TE PAVEMENT PAVEMENT 2 BIT. PATCH 4 4' �, o• o � o• � o � �. o•� .� o � o• � .� o o• o .4�•0: .Q'a.. .d •��: .a'°.. .4 �o: .a 'a . .d •�a: .a'°.. Q'� O D D D D D D D O D C t a s p. ° •4 .a a °. ° '4 ° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4. 'a Q ° 4. '4 a 4° '4 a Q a o. a .o '4 0' t/2 a � 4:' o o.: 4 ;. 'o. o.' 4: 'o. a.' 4: 'o. • o.' 4: o. o.' 4: •. '4 •.' '4 •. p p � •o.. a . p Q � �o.. a . ° Q •o.. � . p Q o., a . 1 '°. a 'A a '°.. a ' a 'a. n ' g" 24 MIN. ONLY ALLOWED PER ENGINEER'S APPROVAL PAVEMENT TREATMENT OPTIONS IN FRONT OF CURB 8c GUTTER FOR USE ON CURB RAMP RETROFITS SMALL RADIUS 2'-10' TYPICAL COMBINED DIRECTIONAL 10 (COMPOUND RAD US) NOTES: POSITIVE FLOW LINE DRAINAGE SHALL BE MAINTAINED THROUGH THE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ROUTE (PAR) AT A 2% MAXIMUM. NO PONDING SHALL BE PRESENT IN THE PAR. ANY VERTICAL LIP THAT OCCURS AT THE FLOW LINE SHALL NOT BE GREATER THAN 1/4 INCH. O1 FOR USE AT CURB CUTS WHERE THE PEDESTRIAN'S PATH OF TRAVEL IS ASSUMED PERPENDICULAR TO THE GUTTER FLOW LINE. RAMP TYPES INCLUDE: PERPENDICULAR, TIERED PERPENDICULAR, PARALLEL, AND DIAGONAL RAMPS. O2 FOR USE AT CURB RAMPS WHERE THE PEDESTRIAN'S PATH OF TRAVEL IS ASSUMED NON PERPENDICULAR TO THE GUTTER FLOW LINE. RAMP TYPES INCLUDE: FANS & DEPRESSED CORNERS. BEGIN GUTTER SLOPE TRANSITION 10' OUTSIDE OF ALL CURB RAMPS. ® THERE SHALL BE NO VERTICAL DISCONTINUITIES GREATER THAN 1/4". O5 ELEVATION CHANGE TAKES PLACE FROM THE EXISTING TO NEW FRONT OF GUTTER. PATCH IS USED TO MATCH THE NEW GUTTER FACE INTO THE EXISTING ROADWAY. © VARIABLE WIDTH FOR DIRECTIONAL CURB APPLICATIONS. SEE SHEET 2 FOR DIRECTIONAL CURB SLOPE REQUIREMENTS. O7 TOP FRONT OF GUTTER SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED FLUSH WITH PROPOSED ADJACENT PAVEMENT ELEVATION. TOP 1.5" OF THE GUTTER FACE MUST BE A FORMED EDGE. PAR GUTTER SHALL NOT BE OVERLAID. ® SHOULD BE USED AT VERTICALLY CONSTRAINED AREAS WHEN AT A DRAINAGE HIGH POINT OR SUPER ELEVATED ROADWAY SEGMEI O9 DRILL AND GROUT NO. 4 EPDXY—COATED 18" LONG TIE BARS AT 30" CENTER TO CENTER INTO EXISTING CONCRETE PAVEMENT 1' MINIMUM FROM ALL JOINTS. 10 HELPS PROVIDE TWO SEPARATE RAMPS, REDUCES THE DOME SETBACK LENGTH AND MINIMIZES DIRECTIONAL CURB. THIS RADIUS DESIGN CLOSELY FOLLOWS THE TURNING VEHICLE PATH WHILE OPTIMIZING CURB RAMP LENGTH. 11 CURB EXTENSIONS SHOULD BE USED IN VERTICALLY CONSTRAINED AREAS, USUALLY IN DOWNTOWN ROADWAY SEGMENTS WHERE ON—STREET PARKING IS AVAILABLE. CURB EXTENSIONS SHOULD BE CONSIDERED FOR APS INTERSECTIONS WHERE SPACE IS LIMITEC PUSH BUTTONS MUST MEET APS CRITERIA AS DESCRIBED IN THE PUSH BUTTON LOCATION DETAIL SHEET. 12 PLACE BOND BREAKER BETWEEN WALK AND TOP OF SILL. 13 1/2" PREFORMED JOINT FILLER PER MNDOT SPEC. 3702. 14 DIMENSION TO BE SAME AS SIDEWALK THICKNESS, 4" MIN. STANDARD PLAN 5-297.2501 3 OF 6 nii /I- A APPROVED: 1 -23-2017 MINN@SOTA In _ REVISED: DEPARTMENT I VV OF ` TRANSPORTATION STATE DE N ENGINEER PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP DETAILS SHEET NO 33 OF 37 SHEETS SMALL RADIUS c� 2'-10' TYPICAL w a � � ~ w w w 0 � z 0 w 0 F-- vn LARGE RADIUS w 20'-40' TYPICAL � D r ADA CURB EXTENSION WITH COMPOUND RADIUS (BUMP OUT)>> DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC s MAIN STREET MILL VERTICAL EDGE EXISTING BIT. PAVEMENT FOR CURB MACHINE PLACEMENT AROUND RADIUS (REGARDLESS OF RAMP TYPE) 2" BITUMINOUS MILL & PATCH o o. .'o o 0' .0 ' o .0 4 °• 4. o. 4 °. 4. o. 4 °, 4. a Q °• 4. o Q °• 4. a 4 0 4• .v o. 4 0. 4, .v o. 4 'v 4• .a o. 4 Q. 4• 4'pa 4'°.. Q•°o. Q•a.. Q•°o. Q•a.. Q•°o. Q•a.. Q•°a. Q•° p �• o, n o_ D• p 0 o �I 24"MIN. BACK OF CURB/ EDGE OF WALK 1/4't �° �� 13o'o'D•°�: 0 0 ° ° 0 z Lo 6„ �I OPTIONAL SILL CURB WHEN SIDEWALK IS AT BACK OF CURB CONCRETE SILL TO BE USED ONLY WHEN SPECIFIED IN THE PLAN. SAWCUT BIT. PAVEMENT O & EXISTING BIT. REMOVE & REPLACE PAVEMENT I BIT. PAVEMENT ,o •o o ,o 24"MIN. SAWCUT SAWCUT BIT. VARIABLE DEPTH CONCRETE PAVEMENT PAVEMENT CONCRETE BASE EXISTING EXISTING BIT.CONCR TE PAVEMENT PAVEMENT 2 BIT. PATCH 4 4' �, o• o � o• � o � �. o•� .� o � o• � .� o o• o .4�•0: .Q'a.. .d •��: .a'°.. .4 �o: .a 'a . .d •�a: .a'°.. Q'� O D D D D D D D O D C t a s p. ° •4 .a a °. ° '4 ° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4. 'a Q ° 4. '4 a 4° '4 a Q a o. a .o '4 0' t/2 a � 4:' o o.: 4 ;. 'o. o.' 4: 'o. a.' 4: 'o. • o.' 4: o. o.' 4: •. '4 •.' '4 •. p p � •o.. a . p Q � �o.. a . ° Q •o.. � . p Q o., a . 1 '°. a 'A a '°.. a ' a 'a. n ' g" 24 MIN. ONLY ALLOWED PER ENGINEER'S APPROVAL PAVEMENT TREATMENT OPTIONS IN FRONT OF CURB 8c GUTTER FOR USE ON CURB RAMP RETROFITS SMALL RADIUS 2'-10' TYPICAL COMBINED DIRECTIONAL 10 (COMPOUND RAD US) NOTES: POSITIVE FLOW LINE DRAINAGE SHALL BE MAINTAINED THROUGH THE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ROUTE (PAR) AT A 2% MAXIMUM. NO PONDING SHALL BE PRESENT IN THE PAR. ANY VERTICAL LIP THAT OCCURS AT THE FLOW LINE SHALL NOT BE GREATER THAN 1/4 INCH. O1 FOR USE AT CURB CUTS WHERE THE PEDESTRIAN'S PATH OF TRAVEL IS ASSUMED PERPENDICULAR TO THE GUTTER FLOW LINE. RAMP TYPES INCLUDE: PERPENDICULAR, TIERED PERPENDICULAR, PARALLEL, AND DIAGONAL RAMPS. O2 FOR USE AT CURB RAMPS WHERE THE PEDESTRIAN'S PATH OF TRAVEL IS ASSUMED NON PERPENDICULAR TO THE GUTTER FLOW LINE. RAMP TYPES INCLUDE: FANS & DEPRESSED CORNERS. BEGIN GUTTER SLOPE TRANSITION 10' OUTSIDE OF ALL CURB RAMPS. ® THERE SHALL BE NO VERTICAL DISCONTINUITIES GREATER THAN 1/4". O5 ELEVATION CHANGE TAKES PLACE FROM THE EXISTING TO NEW FRONT OF GUTTER. PATCH IS USED TO MATCH THE NEW GUTTER FACE INTO THE EXISTING ROADWAY. © VARIABLE WIDTH FOR DIRECTIONAL CURB APPLICATIONS. SEE SHEET 2 FOR DIRECTIONAL CURB SLOPE REQUIREMENTS. O7 TOP FRONT OF GUTTER SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED FLUSH WITH PROPOSED ADJACENT PAVEMENT ELEVATION. TOP 1.5" OF THE GUTTER FACE MUST BE A FORMED EDGE. PAR GUTTER SHALL NOT BE OVERLAID. ® SHOULD BE USED AT VERTICALLY CONSTRAINED AREAS WHEN AT A DRAINAGE HIGH POINT OR SUPER ELEVATED ROADWAY SEGMEI O9 DRILL AND GROUT NO. 4 EPDXY—COATED 18" LONG TIE BARS AT 30" CENTER TO CENTER INTO EXISTING CONCRETE PAVEMENT 1' MINIMUM FROM ALL JOINTS. 10 HELPS PROVIDE TWO SEPARATE RAMPS, REDUCES THE DOME SETBACK LENGTH AND MINIMIZES DIRECTIONAL CURB. THIS RADIUS DESIGN CLOSELY FOLLOWS THE TURNING VEHICLE PATH WHILE OPTIMIZING CURB RAMP LENGTH. 11 CURB EXTENSIONS SHOULD BE USED IN VERTICALLY CONSTRAINED AREAS, USUALLY IN DOWNTOWN ROADWAY SEGMENTS WHERE ON—STREET PARKING IS AVAILABLE. CURB EXTENSIONS SHOULD BE CONSIDERED FOR APS INTERSECTIONS WHERE SPACE IS LIMITEC PUSH BUTTONS MUST MEET APS CRITERIA AS DESCRIBED IN THE PUSH BUTTON LOCATION DETAIL SHEET. 12 PLACE BOND BREAKER BETWEEN WALK AND TOP OF SILL. 13 1/2" PREFORMED JOINT FILLER PER MNDOT SPEC. 3702. 14 DIMENSION TO BE SAME AS SIDEWALK THICKNESS, 4" MIN. STANDARD PLAN 5-297.2501 3 OF 6 nii /I- A APPROVED: 1 -23-2017 MINN@SOTA In _ REVISED: DEPARTMENT I VV OF ` TRANSPORTATION STATE DE N ENGINEER PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP DETAILS SHEET NO 33 OF 37 SHEETS F J LANDING WALKABLE —V - -- FLARE RAMP WALKABLE SURFACE 8-10% CONCRETE FLARE 8-10% --ONCRE' FLARE WALKABLE FLARE WALKABLE SURFACE PAVED FLARES ADJACENT TO WALKABLE SURFACE F J LANDING NON—WALKABLE RAMP NON—WALKABLE SURFACE SURFACE /1: 6 1:6\ CONCRETE CONCRETE FLARE FLARE 1' MINIMUM 3 1 3 2 PAVED FLARES ADJACENT TO NON—WALKABLE SURFACE r � LANDING J RAMP \� NON—WALKABLE i SURFACE i X1:6 1:6\ GRADED GRADED FLARE FLARE NON—WALKABLE SURFACE 3 1 3 GRADED FLARES F J LANDING CURB DESIGN V CURB DESIGN V SEE PEDESTRIAN RAMP SEE PEDESTRIAN APPROACH NOSE APPROACH NOSE n DETAIL DETAIL NON—WALKABLE NON—WALKABLE o SURFACE SURFACE 0 2 1 2 ry i c� z Q RETURNED CURB ( 0 Q TYPICAL SIDE TREATMENT OPTIONS ® 11 z ry w w z c� z Ew EDN N �'o n REVISION: Ld APPR VED : JANUARY 23, 2017 00> ory Q � OPERATIONS ENGINEER KAATrW INlpl ArF c�Re T�pER O CURB TjApER 3" MINIMUM CURB HEIGHT, 4" PREFERRED (MEASURED AT FRONT FACE OF CURB) FOR A MIN. 6" LENGTH (MEASURED ALONG FLOW LINE) MATCH INPLACE O RB j PPR 1 CoRB APER DETECTABLE EDGE WITH CURB AND GUTTER IGE OF ROAD RADIAL DETECTABLE WARNING EDGE OF ROAD .us FACE OF CURB/PROJECTED FACE OF CURB I I I I I PLACE DETECTABLE WARNINGS ENTIRE WALK/PATH WIDTH DETECTABLE WARNINGS I I D' Q p o ' . ' . . -. D• . Q � o I 4' 8.5" °o o CROSSING °. D° SURFACE I •. o o. o o o •o . o �.:. o .� .° ° I I PEDESTRIAN GATE ARM I I RAILROAD C GATE ARM I 4.5' 4.25'-- 8.75' I 16 00 12 NEAREST RAIL 13 DETECTABLE 2' WARNINGS RAILROAD CROSSING PLAN VIEW NOTES: SEE STANDARD PLATE 7038 AND THIS SHEET FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS ON DETECTABLE WARNING. RECTANGULAR DETECTABLE WARNING A WALKABLE SURFACE IS DEFINED AS A PAVED SURFACE ADJACENT TO A CURB RAMP WITHOUT RAISED OBSTACLES THAT COULD MISTAKENLY BE TRAVERSED BY A USER WHO IS VISUALLY IMPAIRED. DETECTABLE EDGE WITHOUT CURB AND GUTTER CONCRETE FLARE LENGTHS ADJACENT TO NON—WALKABLE SURFACES SHOULD BE LESS THAN 8' LONG 6„ VAR. 4„ TURF OR CONCRETE TOP OF GUTTER 7„ SECTION A—A TURF OR 6" CONCRETE TOP OF sidewalk h h /2 P » a 6 9 � 3 SECTION B—B PEDESTRIAN APPROACH NOSE DETAIL (FOR RETURNED CURB SIDE TREATMENT) 14 CROSSING SURFACE SHALL EXTEND 2' MINIMUM PAST THE OUTSIDE EDGE OF WALK OR SHARED—USE PATH. s 15 15 3' FOR MEDIANS AND SPLITTER ISLANDS. NOSE CAN BE REDUCED TO 2' ON FREE RIGHT ISLANDS. 16 SIDEWALK TO BE PLACED 8.75' MIN. FROM THE FACE OF CURB/PROJECTED FACE OF CURB. THIS ENSURES MIN. CLEARANCE BETWEEN THE SIDEWALK AND GATE ARM COUNTERWEIGHT SUPPORTS. niiSTANDARD PLAN 5-297.250 4 OF 6 PEDESTR AN CURB RAMP DETAILS APPROVED: 1 —23-2017 MII IN=SOTA REVISED: DEPARTMENT I TRANS ORTATION STATE DE N ENGINEER SHEET N 0 34 0 F 37 SHEETS MEASURED ALONG THE RAMPS FROM THE BACK OF CURB. O1 0" CURB HEIGHT. O2 FULL CURB HEIGHT. O 2' FOR 4" HIGH CURB AND 3' FOR 6" HIGH CURB. ® SIDE TREATMENTS ARE APPLICABLE TO ALL RAMP TYPES AND SHOULD BE IMPLEMENTED AS NEEDED AS FIELD CONDITIONS DICTATE. THE ENGINEER SHALL DETERMINE THE RAMP SIDE TREATMENTS BASED ON MAINTENANCE OF BOTH ROADWAY AND SIDEWALK, ADJACENT PROPERTY CONSIDERATIONS, AND MITIGATING CONSTRUCTION IMPACTS. g O5 TYPICALLY USED FOR MEDIANS AND ISLANDS. WHEN NO CONCRETE FLARES ARE PROPOSED, THE CONCRETE WALK SHALL BE FORMED AND CONSTRUCTED PERPENDICULAR TO THE EDGE OF ROADWAY. MAINTAIN 3" MAX. BETWEEN EDGE OF DOMES AND EDGE OF CONCRETE. O7 IF NO CURB AND GUTTER IS PLACED IN RURAL SECTIONS, DETECTABLE WARNINGS SHALL BE PLACED 1' FROM THE EDGE OF BITUMINOUS ROADWAY AND/OR BITUMINOUS SHARED—USE PATH TO PROVIDE VISUAL CONTRAST. 2 ® ALL CONSTRUCTED CURBS MUST HAVE A CONTINUOUS DETECTABLE EDGE FOR THE VISUALLY IMPAIRED. THIS DETECTABLE EDGE REQUIRES DETECTABLE WARNINGS WHEREVER THERE IS ZERO—INCH HIGH CURB. CURB TAPERS ARE CONSIDERED A DETECTABLE EDGE WHEN THE TAPER STARTS WITHIN 3" OF THE EDGE OF THE DETECTABLE WARNINGS AND UNIFORMLY RISES TO A 3—INCH MINIMUM CURB HEIGHT. ANY CURB NOT PART OF A CURB TAPER AND LESS THAN 3 INCHES IN HEIGHT IS NOT CONSIDERED A DETECTABLE EDGE AND THEREFORE IS NOT COMPLIANT WITH ACCESSIBILITY STANDARDS. DRILL AND GROUT 1 — NO. 4 12" LONG REINFORCEMENT BAR (EPDXY COATED) WITH 3" MIN. COVER. CURB REINFORCEMENT BARS ARE NOT NEEDED IF THE APPROACH NOSE IS POURED INTEGRAL WITH THE V CURB. DESIGN V 10 DRILL AND GROUT 2 — NO. 4 12" LONG REINFORCEMENT BARS (EPDXY COATED) WITH 3" MIN. COVER. REINFORCEMEN B B BARS ARE NOT NEEDED IF THE APPROACH NOSE IS POURED INTEGRAL WITH THE CURB AND GUTTER. 11 SIDE TREATMENT EXAMPLES SHOWN ARE WHEN THE INITIAL LANDING IS APPROXIMATELY LEVEL WITH THE FULL A HEIGHT CURB (I.E. 6' LONG RAMP FOR 6" HIGH CURB). WHEN THE INITIAL LANDING IS MORE THAN 1" BELOW FULL HEIGHT CURB REFER TO SHEETS 1 & 2 TO MODIFY THE CURB HEIGHT TAPERS AND MAINTAIN POSITIVE CURB & O2 BOULEVARD DRAINAGE. , GUTTER ,� 12 NEAREST EDGE OF DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACES SHALL BE PLACED 12' MINIMUM TO 15' MAXIMUM FROM THE 2' NEAREST RAIL. FOR SKEWED RAILWAYS IN NO INSTANCE SHALL THE DETECTABLE WARNING BE CLOSER THAN 12' MEASURED PERPENDICULAR TO THE NEAREST RAIL. WHEN PEDESTRIAN GATES ARE PROVIDED, DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACES SHALL BE PLACED ON THE SIDE OF THE GATES OPPOSITE THE RAIL, 2' FORM THE APPROACHING SIDE OF THE GATE ARM. THIS O O A CRITERIA GOVERNS OVER NOTE 12. PEDESTRIAN APPROACH NOSE DETAIL (FOR RETURNED CURB SIDE TREATMENT) 14 CROSSING SURFACE SHALL EXTEND 2' MINIMUM PAST THE OUTSIDE EDGE OF WALK OR SHARED—USE PATH. s 15 15 3' FOR MEDIANS AND SPLITTER ISLANDS. NOSE CAN BE REDUCED TO 2' ON FREE RIGHT ISLANDS. 16 SIDEWALK TO BE PLACED 8.75' MIN. FROM THE FACE OF CURB/PROJECTED FACE OF CURB. THIS ENSURES MIN. CLEARANCE BETWEEN THE SIDEWALK AND GATE ARM COUNTERWEIGHT SUPPORTS. niiSTANDARD PLAN 5-297.250 4 OF 6 PEDESTR AN CURB RAMP DETAILS APPROVED: 1 —23-2017 MII IN=SOTA REVISED: DEPARTMENT I TRANS ORTATION STATE DE N ENGINEER SHEET N 0 34 0 F 37 SHEETS n Q rK r) w n O 0 z i CD z Q 0 V CURB ADJACENT TO LANDSCAPE CURB WITHIN SIDEWALK LIMITS ' EXISTING \ 1/2" R. _ WALK ao.a o' :D .°�� �Qava °�"ti 0 � ,p �.'p °.' p.� . ♦..' r p ° j V CURB ADJACENT TO LANDSCAPE CURB OUTSIDE SIDEWALK LIMITS 4' MIN. LANDING VARIABLE HEIGHT H *91 VARIABLE HEIGHT H 1-' B DISTANCE FROM APS PUSH 6" WIDE 7_r BUTTON TO EDGE OF SIDEWALK V—CURB MUST NOT EXCEED 10 INCHES 1:2 1:2 6" WIDE V—CURB 30" X 30" SQUARE 4" PEDESTAL POLE J B PEDESTAL FOUNDATION (LINE UP CENTER OF POLE (MUST BE FLUSH WITH WITH THE BACK OF V—CURB) PLAN VIEW THE SURROUNDING WALK) APS PUSH BUTTON MOUNTING SPACERS (SADDLE ADAPTORS) ° ° 6" WIDE V—CURB 15" TOP OF WALKI I V/1 SECTION B—B SIGNAL PEDESTAL & PUSH BUTTON (V REVISION: APPR VED : JANUARY 23, 2017 OPERATIONS ENGINEER 1/2 R. V CURB INTERSECTION 1 EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING WALK, ' �'' 3 o V CURB ADJACENT TO BUILDING OR BARRIER CONCRETE CURB DESIGN V CURB HEIGHT CURB WIDTH H W < 6" 4" _> 6" 6" VARIABLE HEIGHT H a 4' MIN. LANDING DISTANCE FROM APS PUSH 6" WIDE BUTTON TO EDGE OF SIDEWALK V—CURB A-7 MUST NOT EXCEED 10 INCHES II 6" WIDE V—CURB 4" PUSH BUTTON 18" WIDE BY 18" LONG, STATION POLE A MIN. 12" THICK CONCRETE. MODIFY THE PUSH BUTTON PLAN VIEW STATION TO ALLOW A SQUARE FOUNDATION. APS PUSH BUTTON _ MOUNTING SPACERS (SADDLE ADAPTORS)\� 18" WIDE CONCRETE TO MATCH HEIGHT OF ADJACENT 6" WIDE V—CURB I 1 9 TOP OF WALK I \ � I V SECTION A—A CURB) PUSH BUTTON STATION (V—CURB) s 2' MIN 2' s = - 0--." PEEESTRIAN WALKABLE 9' ' EXISTING 1,.,3 1/2" R. 3 r . WALK ... ,... oma.° 4'0o ` ` � aid `` DO � Q.p✓� � � /, \ D ° o \ < v. �.0 0 ♦.:. ... Q� C ,off. V CURB ADJACENT TO LANDSCAPE CURB WITHIN SIDEWALK LIMITS ' EXISTING \ 1/2" R. _ WALK ao.a o' :D .°�� �Qava °�"ti 0 � ,p �.'p °.' p.� . ♦..' r p ° j V CURB ADJACENT TO LANDSCAPE CURB OUTSIDE SIDEWALK LIMITS 4' MIN. LANDING VARIABLE HEIGHT H *91 VARIABLE HEIGHT H 1-' B DISTANCE FROM APS PUSH 6" WIDE 7_r BUTTON TO EDGE OF SIDEWALK V—CURB MUST NOT EXCEED 10 INCHES 1:2 1:2 6" WIDE V—CURB 30" X 30" SQUARE 4" PEDESTAL POLE J B PEDESTAL FOUNDATION (LINE UP CENTER OF POLE (MUST BE FLUSH WITH WITH THE BACK OF V—CURB) PLAN VIEW THE SURROUNDING WALK) APS PUSH BUTTON MOUNTING SPACERS (SADDLE ADAPTORS) ° ° 6" WIDE V—CURB 15" TOP OF WALKI I V/1 SECTION B—B SIGNAL PEDESTAL & PUSH BUTTON (V REVISION: APPR VED : JANUARY 23, 2017 OPERATIONS ENGINEER 1/2 R. V CURB INTERSECTION 1 EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING WALK, ' �'' 3 o V CURB ADJACENT TO BUILDING OR BARRIER CONCRETE CURB DESIGN V CURB HEIGHT CURB WIDTH H W < 6" 4" _> 6" 6" VARIABLE HEIGHT H a 4' MIN. LANDING DISTANCE FROM APS PUSH 6" WIDE BUTTON TO EDGE OF SIDEWALK V—CURB A-7 MUST NOT EXCEED 10 INCHES II 6" WIDE V—CURB 4" PUSH BUTTON 18" WIDE BY 18" LONG, STATION POLE A MIN. 12" THICK CONCRETE. MODIFY THE PUSH BUTTON PLAN VIEW STATION TO ALLOW A SQUARE FOUNDATION. APS PUSH BUTTON _ MOUNTING SPACERS (SADDLE ADAPTORS)\� 18" WIDE CONCRETE TO MATCH HEIGHT OF ADJACENT 6" WIDE V—CURB I 1 9 TOP OF WALK I \ � I V SECTION A—A CURB) PUSH BUTTON STATION (V—CURB) s 2' MIN 2' s = - 0--." PEEESTRIAN WALKABLE 9' 4 __11110- 3 r WALKABLE FLARE I SEMI—DIRECTIONAL RAMP (3,4,9) 3' DOME SETBACK, 4' LONG RAMP AND PUSH BUTTON 9' FROM THE BACK OF CURB PRIMARILY USED FOR APS APPLICATIONS WHERE THE PAR DOES NOT CONTINUE PAST THE PUSH BUTTON (DEAD—END SIDEWALK) PEDESTRIAN PATH — — OF TRAVEL INSET A EXISTING SIDEWALK LANDING RAMP OT RAMP LENGTH ■� i 1.5% 4.5% O (VAR.) r r 6.0' (VAR.) INSET A TRANSITION PANEL ®® NOTES: A WALKABLE FLARE IS AN 8-10% CONCRETE FLARE THAT IS REQUIRED WHEN THE FLARE IS ADJACENT TO A WALKABLE SURFACE, OR WHEN THE PEDESTRIAN PATH OF TRAVEL OF A PUSH BUTTON TRAVERSES THE FLARE. ALL V CURB CONTRACTION JOINTS SHALL MATCH CONCRETE WALK JOINTS. WHERE RIGHT—OF—WAY ALLOWS, USE OF V CURB SHOULD BE MINIMIZED. GRADING ADJACENT TURF OR SLOPING ADJACENT PAVEMENT IS PREFERRED. V CURB SHALL BE PLACED OUTSIDE THE SIDEWALK LIMITS WHEN RIGHT OF WAY ALLOWS. V CURB NEXT TO BUILDING SHALL BE A 4" WIDTH AND SHALL MATCH PREVIOUS TOP OF SIDEWALK ELEVATIONS. O1 END TAPERS AT TRANSITION SECTION SHALL MATCH INPLACE SIDEWALK GRADES. O ALL V CURB SHALL MATCH BOTTOM OF ADJACENT WALK. O EDGE BETWEEN NEW V CURB AND INPLACE STRUCTURE SHALL BE SEALED AND BOND BREAKER SHALL BE USED BETWEEN EXISTING STRUCTURE AND PLACED V—CURB. ® THE MAX. RATE OF CROSS SLOPE TRANSITIONING IS 1 LINEAR FOOT OF SIDEWALK PER HALF PERCENT CROSS SLOPE. WHEN PAR WIDTH IS GREATER THAN 6' OR THE RUNNING SLOPE IS GREATER THAN 5%, DOUBLE THE CALCULATED TRANSITION LENGTH. O TRANSITION PANELS ARE TO ONLY BE USED AFTER THE RAMP, OR IF NEEDED, LANDING AREA AT THE FULL CURB HEIGHT (TYPICAL SECTION). © EXISTING CROSS SLOPE GREATER THAN 2.0%. LEGEND THESE LONGITUDINAL SLOPE RANGES SHALL BE THE STARTING POINT. IF SITE CONDITIONS WARRANT, LONGITUDINAL SLOPES UP TO 8.3% OR FLATTER ARE ALLOWED. s INDICATES PEDESTRIAN RAMP — SLOPE SHALL BE BETWEEN 5.0% MINIMUM AND 8.3% MAXIMUM IN THE DIRECTION SHOWN AND THE CROSS SLOPE SHALL NOT EXCEED 2.0%. LANDING AREA — 4' X 4' MIN. (5' X 5' MIN. PREFERRED) DIMENSIONS AND MAX 2.0% SLOPE IN ALL DIRECTIONS. LANDING SHALL BE FULL WIDTH OF INCOMING PARS. 0 TRANSITION PANEL(S) — TO BE USED FOR TRANSITIONING THE CROSS—SLOPE OF A RAMP TO THE EXISTING WALK CROSS—SLOPE. RATE OF TRANSITION SHOULD BE 0.5% PER 1 LINEAR FOOT OF WALK. SEE THIS SHEET FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. 11 STANDARD PLAN 5- rn MINN@SOTA DEPARTMENT I OF ` TRANSPORTATION STATE DE N ENGINEER 297.250 1 5 OF 6 APPROVED: 1 —23-2017 REVISED: PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP DETAILS SHEET N 0 35 OF 37 SHEETS LANDING \ \ \ \ \ \\\ 0 \ \ ALLOWABLLE \ w \ \ TABLING \ \ O \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \AREA \ \ \ w \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \\ \ \ \\\\\\ w \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ EDGE OF THROUGH LANE 1.0% MIN. 5.0% MAX. 1.0% MIN. 5.0% MAX. EDGE OF THROUGH LANE 2' \ \ \ \\\\\\ \ \ \ \ \ TYPICAL\ ABLIAIG AREA \ \ \ 1.0% MIN. 5.0% MAX. 0 NON -CONCRETE BOULEVARD 0 LANDING CONCRETE BOULEVARD EXPANSION MATERIAL PLACEMENT FOR CONCRETE AND BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS 0 NON-( BOULE 0 OPTIONAL CURB LINE REINFORCEMENT O PLACEMENT ON BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS 4 Z PEDESTRIAN RAMP PEDESTRIAN RAMP J s UP TO 2.0%'s .0% MAX. OR UP s UP TO 2.0% 's 's UP TO 2.0%' CHANGE TO 4% CHANGE 2.0% MAX. OR UP 0 CHANGE TO 4% CHANGE CHANGE D O ry ~ FLOW LINE PROFILE "TABLE" - TWIN PERPENDICULARS w O PEDESTRIAN RAMP s no -s no -s \ \ \ o Do - HD TO 2.0% 2.0% MAX. OR UP UP TO 2.0% \ \ \ CHANGE TO 4% CHANGE CHANGE \ \ \ FLOW LINE PROFILE "TABLE" - FAN LANDING � 10% MIN. \ 5 . .0% MAX. \ PEDESTRIAN RAMP \ \ \ s ss ss \ 1.0% MIN. 1.0% MIN. 1.0% MIN. \ 5.0% MAX. 1.5% PREFERRED 5.0% MAX. \ PEDESTRIAN RAMP >_s sm--s s 1.0% MIN. 1.0% MIN. 1.5% PREFERRED 5.0% MAX. \ FLOW LINE PROFILE RAISE - TWIN PERPENDICULARS \ \ PEDESTRIAN RAMP low- \ s 1.0% MIN. -s 1.0% MIN. -s 1.0% MIN. \ 5.0% MAX. 1.5% PREFERRED 5.0% MAX. n 2\ ~' FLOW LINE PROFILE RAISE - FAN T/2r PLAN VIEW 12" MIN. 2 EXISTING 36" SIDEWALK SIDEWALK MAX. REPLACEMENT 2 EXISTING SIDEWALK SAW CONCRETE SIDEWALK FULL DEPTH ON EXISTING JOINT (INCIDENTAL) PROFILE VIEW T/ T/2!` 4" SIDEWALK (TYPICAL) OPTIONAL SIDEWALK REINFORCEMENT SIDEWALK REINFORCEMENT TO BE USED ONLY WHEN SPECIFIED IN THE PLAN. PROPOSEn PAR CURB ANI PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER SAWCUT EXISTING CURI AND GUTTER 3" MIN. S3" MIN.o,a .°.a°a AWCUT FOR USE ON CURB RAMP RETROFITS CURB AND GUTTER O REINFORCEMENT OPTIONAL CURB LINE REINFORCEMENT DETAILS OO 12" LANDING ° 0 0 opo � c . p � p p D D 0 o p D 12" 12" 3" SEPARATE LANDING POUR REINFORCEMENT 3" r o LANDING o: � p po C. p p 12" ° ° 1\ o 36" MAX. / D 36" MAX. 36" MAX. 12" 36" MAX. 36" MAX. 12" 3" NOTES: O1 TO ENSURE RAMPS AND LANDINGS ARE PROPERLY CONSTRUCTED, ALL INITIAL LANDINGS AT A TOP OF A RAMPED SURFACE (RUNNING SLOPE GREATER THAN 2%) SHALL BE FORMED AND PLACED SEPARATELY IN AN INDEPENDENT CONCRETE POUR. FOLLOW SIDEWALK REINFORCEMENT DETAILS ON THIS SHEET FOR ALL SEPARATELY POURED INITIAL LANDINGS. O2 DRILL AND GROUT NO. 4 12" LONG REINFORCEMENT BARS AT 36" MAXIMUM CENTER TO CENTER (EPDXY COATED). BARS TO BE ADJUSTED TO MATCH RAMP GRADE. DRILL AND GROUT 2 - NO. 4 X 12" LONG REINFORCEMENT BARS (EPDXY COATED). REINFORCEMENT REQUIRED FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION JOINTS WITHIN RADIUS. ® THIS OPTIONAL CURB LINE REINFORCEMENT DETAIL SHOULD ONLY BE USED ON BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS WHEN SPECIFIED IN THE PLAN. 1/2 IN. PREFORMED JOINT FILLER MATERIAL PER MNDOT SPEC. 3702. niiSTANDARD PLAN 5-297.250 6 OF 6 A APPROVED: 1-23-2017 MINN@SOTA REVISED: DEPARTMENT I V I Y TRANS ORTATION STATE DE N ENGINEER PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP DETAILS SHEET NO 36 OF 37 SHEETS CURB LINE AND ROAD CROSSING ADJUSTMENTS o n o "TABLING" OF CROSSWALKS MEANS MAINTAINING LESS THAN 2% CROSS SLOPE WITHIN A CROSSWALK, o IS REQUIRED WHEN A ROADWAY IS IN A STOP OR YIELD CONDITION AND THE PROJECT SCOPE ALLOWS. z RECONSTRUCTION PROJECTS: ON FULL PAVEMENT REPLACEMENT PROJECTS z "TABLING" OF ENTIRE CROSSWALK SHALL OCCUR WHEN FEASIBLE. MILL & OVERLAY PROJECTS: "TABLING" OF FLOW LINES, IN FRONT OF THE PEDESTRIAN RAMP, IS REQUIRED WHEN THE EXISTING FLOW LINE IS GREATER THAN 2%. WARPING OF THE BITUMINOUS Q PAVEMENT CAN NOT EXTEND INTO THE THROUGH LANE. TABLE THE FLOW LINE TO 2% OR AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE WHILE ADHERING TO THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA; 1) 1.0% MIN. CROSS -SLOPE OF THE ROAD c� z 2) 5.0% MAX. CROSS -SLOPE OF THE ROAD cy 3) "TABLE" FLOW LINE UP TO 4% CHANGE FROM EXISTING SLOPE IN FRONT OF PEDESTRIAN RAMP z 4) UP TO 2% CHANGE IN FLOW LINE FROM EXISTING SLOPE BEYOND THE PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP c� z E STAND-ALONE ADA RETROFITS: FOLLOW MILL & OVERLAY CRITERIA ABOVE HOWEVER ALL PAVEMENT N o WARPING IS DONE WITH BITUMINOUS PATCHING ON BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS AND FULL -DEPTH APRON REPLACEMENT ON CONCRETE ROADWAYS. N � REVISION: RAISING OF CURB LINES SHOULD OCCUR IN VERTICALLY CONSTRAINED AREAS. RAISE THE CURB LINES ENOUGH TO o ALLOW COMPLIANT RAMPS OR AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE WHILE ADHERING TO THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA; NI- LJAPPR VED : JANUARY 23, 2017 1) 1.0% MIN. AND 5.0% MAXIMUM CROSS -SLOPE OF THE ROAD 00 > 0 cy 2) 1.0% MIN. FLOW LINE (ON EITHER SIDE OF PEDESTRIAN RAMP) TO MAINTAIN POSITIVE DRAINAGE 3 5.0% RECOMMENDED MAX. FLOW LINE Q _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ OPERATIONS ENGINEER 4) LONGITUDINAL THROUGH LANE ROADWAY TAPERS SHOULD BE 1" VERTICAL PER 15' HORIZONTAL T/2r PLAN VIEW 12" MIN. 2 EXISTING 36" SIDEWALK SIDEWALK MAX. REPLACEMENT 2 EXISTING SIDEWALK SAW CONCRETE SIDEWALK FULL DEPTH ON EXISTING JOINT (INCIDENTAL) PROFILE VIEW T/ T/2!` 4" SIDEWALK (TYPICAL) OPTIONAL SIDEWALK REINFORCEMENT SIDEWALK REINFORCEMENT TO BE USED ONLY WHEN SPECIFIED IN THE PLAN. PROPOSEn PAR CURB ANI PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER SAWCUT EXISTING CURI AND GUTTER 3" MIN. S3" MIN.o,a .°.a°a AWCUT FOR USE ON CURB RAMP RETROFITS CURB AND GUTTER O REINFORCEMENT OPTIONAL CURB LINE REINFORCEMENT DETAILS OO 12" LANDING ° 0 0 opo � c . p � p p D D 0 o p D 12" 12" 3" SEPARATE LANDING POUR REINFORCEMENT 3" r o LANDING o: � p po C. p p 12" ° ° 1\ o 36" MAX. / D 36" MAX. 36" MAX. 12" 36" MAX. 36" MAX. 12" 3" NOTES: O1 TO ENSURE RAMPS AND LANDINGS ARE PROPERLY CONSTRUCTED, ALL INITIAL LANDINGS AT A TOP OF A RAMPED SURFACE (RUNNING SLOPE GREATER THAN 2%) SHALL BE FORMED AND PLACED SEPARATELY IN AN INDEPENDENT CONCRETE POUR. FOLLOW SIDEWALK REINFORCEMENT DETAILS ON THIS SHEET FOR ALL SEPARATELY POURED INITIAL LANDINGS. O2 DRILL AND GROUT NO. 4 12" LONG REINFORCEMENT BARS AT 36" MAXIMUM CENTER TO CENTER (EPDXY COATED). BARS TO BE ADJUSTED TO MATCH RAMP GRADE. DRILL AND GROUT 2 - NO. 4 X 12" LONG REINFORCEMENT BARS (EPDXY COATED). REINFORCEMENT REQUIRED FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION JOINTS WITHIN RADIUS. ® THIS OPTIONAL CURB LINE REINFORCEMENT DETAIL SHOULD ONLY BE USED ON BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS WHEN SPECIFIED IN THE PLAN. 1/2 IN. PREFORMED JOINT FILLER MATERIAL PER MNDOT SPEC. 3702. niiSTANDARD PLAN 5-297.250 6 OF 6 A APPROVED: 1-23-2017 MINN@SOTA REVISED: DEPARTMENT I V I Y TRANS ORTATION STATE DE N ENGINEER PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP DETAILS SHEET NO 36 OF 37 SHEETS w w I 0 i CD z Q ry 0 z Q J n z it w w z Ez 0 W Ln L o o � I rq I o N W 00> o ry �n n Q DATE 18" MIN. I 1. SIGN TO BE PLACE 100' O.C. ALONG FENCE THRU WOODED LOT AREA, ON INDIVIDUAL SPECIMENS WHERE NOTED, AND LEGEND l ONE ON EACH TREE LINE AREA TO BE SAVED. SIGNS TO BE 4"_ TREE SAVEAFFIXED TO STEEL POSTS. 12 MIN. TREE REMOVAL AREA 2, ALL PASSIVE TREE PROTECTION MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY � \ AREA "KEEP OUT" OR "TREE SAVE AREA" SIGNAGE. TYPICAL SIGN NO SCALE TREE SAVE AREA 80 0 I 80 160 — TREE PROTECTION 10 SCALE IN FT. DELINEATION 10 P—OH P- 0 / !! " / T---� P I I I or I / //III; z/ ` o � CS _ / Post/ //jlkf \\—X060_—_— � /"---1050 /"O` i--1050 �, 0 \ SITE BOUNbARY w Ld / ///i' Z er ILAJ-Z � � � 1 I I `fi( / / / / _� \ \ \ \ / wl /�� \��0`�a\1//// / \\ j �� -AO IN, \\ I 1 I I \\ \\\\\ \_ /'// \\\ \\ \\ \��� % /� % I/III-------�_J/ oti`r \ \ I 1 —/ / / / / 'o \ \ \ \� \ lam__--- / / ' / i 1 1 \ / / \ \ \ 1 --- _� / / 1_i / °*O --1oao--���/// 1030.—\/�//' ��_��_�---1030-- —�=_� /' \\��// / / ' �i/� j j I// /I \-I' � \ \ \ \���� ���-- ---1020--/_�--__ // % I I I/ II / i°p ofy15\\I IIS I, EIIe��L497.2 (o �M)11P� I oma/ / / � � \ — 14 I � I 1 / / / / / / I I So i \i / / I I REVISION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State Minn ota. i C AI J. JOCHUM, P.E. Date 4/8/19 Lic. No. 23461 REMOVE TAGGED TREE DESIGNED BY: CJJ RUM RIVER DRAWN BY: MSS LAND SURVEYORS & ENGINEERS CHECKED BY: Po Box 1044 Telephone: (763) 389-4476 TAE Princeton, MN 55371 Fax: (763) 631-0376 I—L TREELINE ELEVATION VIEW NO SCALE TREE PROTECTION DELINEATION �-6' MIN TREE PROTECTION DELINEATION DELINEATION OF TREE LINE PROTECTION SHALL IDEALLY BE LOCATED AT THE OUTER PERIMETER OF THE DRIPLINE. WOODLOT 6' MIN TREE PROTECTION DELINEATION 1. STANDARD 48" HIGH SNOW FENCE OR ORANGE SAFETY FENCE. 2. CAUTION RIBBON 4" WIDE MAY BE USED AS PASSIVE TREE PROTECTION OR APPROVED EQUAL. PASSIVE TREE PROTECTION MAY ONLY BE UTILIZED TO DELINEATE TREE SAVE AREAS WHICH ARE REMOTE FROM AREAS OF LAND DISTURBANCE. 3. STEEL POSTS AS NEEDED. 4. DELINEATION OF TREE LINE PROTECTION SHALL EXTEND CONTINUOUSLY THROUGH PROTECTION AREAS, TOTALLY SURROUND INDIVIDUAL SPECIMENS AS NOTED, OR EXTEND ACROSS THE FACE AND THE ENDS SHALL EXTEND 6' BACK FOR INDIVIDUAL TREE LINE PROTECTION. GENERAL NOTES: 1. ALL TREES SHOWN IN THE TREE SAVE AREA SHALL BE PROTECTED. 2. NO STORAGE OF MATERIALS, OPERATION OF MACHINERY, OR DEVELOPMENT OF ANY SORT WILL OCCUR WITHIN THE WOODLAND SIDE OF PROTECTIVE DELINEATION WITHOUT APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER. 3. ERECT PROTECTIVE DELINEATION CONTINUOUSLY ALONG DRIP LINE OF SIGNIFICANT TREES CLOSEST TO STREET RIGHTS—OF—WAY. FINAL LOCATION OF DELINEATION SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY ENGINEER IN THE FIELD. SECURE DELINEATION TO METAL POSTS AT A HEIGHT OF 4 FEET. 4. GRADING SHALL COMMENCE ONLY AFTER PROTECTIVE MEASURES HAVE BEEN COMPLETED AND ALL CONTRACTORS HAVE BEEN BRIEFED ON PRESERVATION TECHNIQUES AND PROCEDURES. 5. NO TRENCH FOR UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHALL BE PERMITTED ON THE WOODLAND SIDE OF PROTECTIVE DELINEATION. 6. IF PRUNING IS NECESSARY, PRUNING WILL BE DONE BY PROFESSIONALS DURING APPROPRIATE PRUNING SEASON FOR SPECIES. 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL COSTS OF TREE REPLACEMENT RESULTING FROM DAMAGE TO TREES WITHIN PROTECTED AREAS. 8. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING PROTECTIVE DELINEATION AND SIGNS IN GOOD REPAIR THROUGHOUT DURATION OF PROJECT. 9. ALL UTILITIES INSTALLED AS PART OF THE DEVELOPMENT WILL BE WITHIN STREET RIGHTS—OF—WAY OR UTILITY EASEMENTS. 10. CONTACT THE CITY FORESTER (ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT) AT 755-5100 TO ARRANGE A PRECONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE WITH THE CITY FORESTER/TREE INSPECTOR PRIOR TO ANY LAND DISTURBANCE. 11. ALL TREE PROTECTION MEASURES SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO BUILDING CONSTRUCTION. 12. ORANGE POLY SAFETY FENCE OR ORANGE SILT FENCE SHALL BE LOCATED AT THE OUTER PERIMETER OF THE DRIPLINE OR AS DIRECTED BY CITY FORESTER. REFERENCE NOTES: 10 ALL OTHER TREE PROTECTION SHALL BE PASSIVE. SPIRIT HILLS SOUTH SHEET TREE PRESERVATION PLAN 37 CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA 37 SHEETS P-4367.01 0 3 / z z Of w w RUM RIVER N tD r7 LAND SURVEYORS & ENTCI N FIRS a / PO Box 1044 Telephone: (763) 389-4476 N Princeton, MN 55371 Fax: (763) 631-0376 SPIRIT HILLS SOUTH SITE DEVELOPMENT AND CONSTRUCTION PLANS FOR R.W. LAND HOLDINGS, I.I.C. IN THE CIN OF MONTICELLO PROJECT LOCATION au✓���ii i if�i THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION IN THIS PLAN IS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF CI/ASCE 38-02, ENTITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." BENCHMARKS: 1Q TNH WEST SIDE OF BISON AVENUE, 160 FEET NORTH OF BISON CIRCLE. ELEV=1012.64 02 TNH IN THE SOUTHWEST QUADRANT OF WILDWOOD WAY AND WILDWOOD BOULEVARD. ELEV=1034.15 DEVELOPER/OWNER R.W. LAND HOLDINGS, LLC. P.O. BOX 206 PRINCETON, MN 55371 ROGER WINKELMAN 763-389-1873 ENGINEER/SURVEYOR RUM RIVER LAND SURVEYORS AND ENGINEERS P.O. BOX 1044 PRINCETON, MN 55371 CRAIG J. JOCHUM, P.E. BRIAN PERSON, P.L.S. 763-427-5860 763-427-0520 (FAX) z-, CITY OF MONTICELLO, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA �1 1� 600 0 600 1200 SCALE IN FEET GOVERNING SPECIFICATIONS ALL STREET CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO STANDARDS & SPECIFICATIONS. ALL SANITARY SEWER CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO STANDARDS & SPECIFICATIONS. ALL STORM SEWER CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO STANDARDS & SPECIFICATIONS. ALL WATER DISTRIBUTION CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO STANDARDS & SPECIFICATIONS. PAVING SHALL NOT START UNTIL SUBGRADE COMPACTION TESTS HAVE BEEN TAKEN AND ROADWAY CONDITIONS ARE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Pofe ssiona Engine r under the laws of the State of Minnesota.. I. � 23461 DATE 4/8/19 CRAIGI. JO HUM, E. LIC. NO. APPROVED BY CITY ENGINEER DATE REVISION 4/19/19 ADD PLANTING PLAN DATE SHEET 1 OF 37 SHEETS P-4367.01 SHEE INDEX THIS PLAN CONTAINS 39 SHEETS SHEET NO. DESCRIPTION 1 TITLE SHEET 2 TYPICAL LOT SECTIONS AND FILTRATION BASIN DETAIL 3 LOT TABULATIONS 4-8 DETAILS 9 CONSTRUCTION AND GRADING NOTES 10-11 EXISTING CONDITIONS AND REMOVALS PLAN 12-13 GRADING, DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN 14-17 SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN—WILDWOOD BOULEVARD 18-20 SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN—BISON AVENUE 21-24 STREET AND STORM SEWER—WILDWOOD BOULEVARD 25-27 STREET AND STORM SEWER—BISON AVENUE 28 TRAIL—OUTLOT A & B 29-30 TRAIL—FENNING AVENUE 31-36 PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP DETAILS 37 TREE PRESERVATION PLAN L1 PLANTING PLAN L2 MONUMENT AND PLANTING PLAN I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Pofe ssiona Engine r under the laws of the State of Minnesota.. I. � 23461 DATE 4/8/19 CRAIGI. JO HUM, E. LIC. NO. APPROVED BY CITY ENGINEER DATE REVISION 4/19/19 ADD PLANTING PLAN DATE SHEET 1 OF 37 SHEETS P-4367.01 3 w �I 0 r, Co M i 0 z z a 0 z a J CL z z Of w w z PCDo oCD M I? o� N a; aa - Y ** DENOTES TWO (2) COURSE DROP DATE REVISION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I DEM gf; SHEET LOT TABULATION C�� R r n T�� LOT TABULATIONS 3 of the State ��nnT ppb"By.�J RUM M j� �/Mss SPIRIT HILLS SOUTH °F(� GARAGE DRIVEWAY LOWEST LOWEST Dote 4/8/19 Lic. No. 23461 TAE HOUSE CENTERLINE P-4367.01 LOT AREA LOT BLOCK FLOOR GRADE LIVABLE FLOOR OPENING TYPE OF STREET (SQ. FT.) ELEVATION (%) ELEVATION ELEVATION 1 1 FBLO 1029.3 1032.9 8.0% 1025.15 1 1028.15 15890 2 1 FBWO 1035.9 1039.5 8.0% 1031.77 I 1031.77 14879 3 1 FBWO 1043.7 I 1047.3 8.0% 1039.63 1 1039.63 14826 4 I 1 FBWO 1 1050.8 1 1053.5 6.0% 1045.77 1 1045.77 16867 5 1 1 FBWO 1 1054.1 1055.5 3.0% 1047.78 I 1047.78 1 30331 6 1 FB 1 1055.9 , 1058.6 6.0% ' 1050.91 I 1058.61 1 24160 7 ' 1 FB I 1056.0 I 1058.7 1 6.0% ( 1051.00 1 1058.70 1 14469 8 I 1 I FB 1054.4 I 1057.1 I 6.0% 1049.38 1057.08 I 16965 1 I 2 I FB 1053.3 ( 1056.9 I 8.0% 1049.17 I 1056.87 I 20171 2 I 2 I FB 1053.6 I 1057.2 I 8.0% 1049.46 1057.16 18971 3 1 2 I FB 1 1054.7 1 1057.0 1 5.0% 1049.27 i 1056.97 1 14078 4 I 2 FB 1 1054.9 1057.2 1 5.0% 1 1049.47 I 1057.17 1 24018 5 1 2 1 FB 1 1040.3 1 1043.9 i 8.0% 1 1036.22 1 1043.92 1 19199 6 1 2 I FB 1 1038.9 1 1042.5 1 8.0% 1 1034.81 1 1042.51 1 21355 1 1 3 1 FBWO 1 1039.9 1 1043.5 1 8.0% 1 1035.79 1 1035.79 1 17008 2 I 3 1 FBWO 1 1055.9 1 1057.2 1 3.0% 1049.52 I 1049.52 1 20041 3 1 3 1 FBWO 1053.2 I 1054.6 i 3.0% ' 1046.87 1 1046.87 1 21316 4 ( 3 ( FBWO ' 1054.0 I 1055.3 1 3.0% 1 1047.63 1 1047.63 16120 5 I 3 FBWO 1 1054.3 1055.7 1 3.0% 1 1047.99 1047.99 , 14025 6 I 3 , FBWO 1 1054.8 ' 1056.2 1 3.0% 1048.48 I 1048.48 1 19463 7 1 3 I FBWO 1 1049.4 I 1050.8 1 3.0% ' 1043.09 1043.09 1 20777 8 1 3 ( FBWO 1 1043.4 1044.8 1 3.0% I 1037.05 1037.05 1 18653 9 I 3 1 FB 1 1020.5 , 1024.1 1 8.0% 1 1016.35 1024.05 1 18802 10 I 3 FB 1 1023.1 1 1026.7 1 8.0% I 1018.95 1 1026.65 1 14908 11 1 3 FB 1 1025.6 I 1029.2 1 8.0% I 1021.50 1 1029.20 1 16273 12 I 3 ( FB I 1030.4 1 1034.0 1 8.0% 1 1026.25 1 1033.95 1 26255 13 I 3 1 FB I 1029.5 1 1033.1 I 8.0% 1 1025.42 I 1033.12 1 15655 14 I 3 1 FB 1 1027.9 1 1031.5 I 8.0% 1023.77 I 1031.47 1 16248 15 1 3 1 FBWO 1 1032.5 1 1036.1 1 8.0% , 1028.37 1 1028.37 1 26522 1 I 4 1 FBWO I 1018.7 1 1020.0 I 3.0% 1 1012.34 I 1012.34 1 22301 2 I 4 1 FBWO I 1019.4 1020.7 I 3.0% 1 1013.01 I 1013.01 1 14000 3 4 FBWO 1 1023.4 ' 1024.7 1 3.0% 1 1017.02 1 1017.02 1 14000 4 4 , FBWO 1 1030.3 I 1031.6 1 3.0% I 1023.91 1 1023.91 14000 5 4 1 FBWO 1 1037.2 1 1038.6 1 3.0% 1 1030.86 1030.86 , 14000 6 I 4 1 FBWO i 1040.2 1042.5 1 5.0% 1 1034.76 I 1034.76 1 14000 7 I 4 1 FBWO 1 1040.1 ' 1043.3 1 7.0% 1 1035.56 1 1035.56 1 14000 8 1 4 1 FBWO ** 1038.5 1 1042.1 1 8.0% 1 1035.77 1 1035.77 1 14000 1 5 1 FB 1016.0 1 1019.6 8.0% 1 1011.91 I 1019.61 1 14032 2 5 1 FBLO 1 1022.9 1 1026.5 , 8.0% 1 1018.83 I 1021.83 1 14039 3 I 5 1 FBWO 1 1028.2 1 1029.6 1 3.0% 1 1021.86 1 1021.86 1 15105 4 5 FBWO 1 1029.4 I 1030.7 1 3.0% 1023.03 1 1023.03 1 15262 5 I 5 FBWO 1 1030.4 1 1031.8 I 3.0% 1024.05 I 1024.05 1 20360 6 I 5 1 FBWO I 1027.5 1028.8 I 3.0% 1 1021.14 1021.14 1 18982 7 I 5 1 FBWO 1 1024.7 1026.0 1 3.0% 1 1018.33 I 1018.33 1 14805 8 I 5 1 FBWO 1 1021.6 I 1023.0 1 3.0% 1 1015.29 1 1015.29 1 14805 9 5 1 FBWO 1 1019.1 1 1020.5 3.0% 1 1012.78 I 1012.78 1 20924 1 6 1 FBWO 1 1023.1 1 1026.7 ' 8.0% ( 1018.97 1 1018.97 1 17299 2 I 6 1 FBWO 1 1015.8 1 1019.4 1 8.0% I 1011.65 I 1011.65 1 14852 ** DENOTES TWO (2) COURSE DROP DATE REVISION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I DEM gf; SHEET 4/19/19 ADD LOT AREA am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws C�� R r n T�� LOT TABULATIONS 3 of the State ��nnT ppb"By.�J RUM M j� �/Mss SPIRIT HILLS SOUTH °F(� ta'P.E. LAND SURVEYORS 8t ENGINS6R.SAI.VOCHUM, i Pnn 1..,MN 55371 1- 763)63 -03763) 694476 7 Dote 4/8/19 Lic. No. 23461 TAE CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA SHEETS P-4367.01 i 1 50 0 I 50 100 SCALE IN FT. LEGEND PROPOSED TREE LOCATION 0 -SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET MTREE PRESERVATION AREA DATE REVISION ma o � N F_ > 01 > Ir La a� Q Y GENERAL NOTES: 1. THE DEVELOPER WILL ARRANGE TO HAVE TREES PLANTED IN THE APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS AS SHOWN. TO PREVENT DAMAGE TREES WILL BE PLANTED ON EACH LOT AS THE HOMES ARE CONSTRUCTED. REFERENCE NOTES: 1T TREES SHALL BE 2" ACI MINIMUM. 02 FINAL ENTRANCE MONUMENT SIZE AND MATERIAL TO BE DETERMINED BY OWNER I 1 I L---------- r-------------- 1 L9j I I I I I I ! 2 ---J I I p r 1 L--------- m / ! I I I I I I I ! I I I ! I ! L ----------J L ---------j „ A/ --0' 8741 STAKE � j 18' POLYPROPYLENE OR — POLYETHYLENE (40 MIL 1 -1/2 - WIDE STRAP TYP.) DOUBLE STRAND 14 GA. WIRE — 3' O 120' INTERVAL (TYP.) TREE WRAP TO FIRST BRANCH TURNBUCKLE WITH DOUBLE STRAND /14 GAUGE WIRE — 3 PER TREE 4'-8' LAYER OF SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH IN SAUCER—EXTEND PAST STAKE FINAL GRADE OF PLANT TO EQUAL ORIGINAL GRADE 2'x2'x30' STAKES SET 120' APART OUTSIDE THE BALL AT ANGLE — 3 PER TREE i—BACKFu_ WITH PLANTING SOIL MAINTAIN PEDESTAL OF NOTES TWO ALTERNATE METHODS OF TREE STAKING ARE SHOWN. IT 15 THE CONTRACTOR'S OPTION TO STAKE TREES HOWEVER, THE CONTRACTOR S RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTAINING TREES IN A PLUMB POSITION THROUGHOUT THE GUARANTEE PERIOD. SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF HOLE PRIOR TO PLANTING. DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL i `> _ 1 / / 1 1 / J W / z W I PROPOSED ENTRANCE I r , I MONUMENT �2 I I I ��\ WILDWOOD BOULEVARD / z I I I I z w -- I r IL----------� L----- 7F777 "A I hereby certify that this plan specification or report was DESIQIm gP• / PLANTING NOTES: 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ONE YEAR GUARANTEE OF ALL PLANT MATERIALS. THE GUARANTEE BEGINS ON THE DATE OF THE OWNER'S ACCEPTANCE OF THE INITIAL PLANTING. REPLACEMENT PLANT MATERIALS SHALL ALSO HAVE A ONE YEAR GUARANTEE COMMENCING UPON PLANTING. 2. ALL PLANTS TO BE NORTHERN—GROWN AND HARDY. PLANTS TO BE INSTALLED AS PER STANDARD AAN PLANTING PRACTICES. 3. USE MINIMUM 12" LOAM PLANTING SOIL ON TREES. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATIONS WITH ALL UTILITIES PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF PLANTS. 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL WATER ALL NEW PLANTS UNTiL ACCEPTED BY BY THE OWNER. 6. STAKING OF TREES OPTIONAL; REPOSITION IF NOT PLUMB AFTER ONE YEAR. 7. WRAP ALL SMOOTH—BARKED TREES—FASTEN TOP AND BOTTOM. REMOVE BY APRIL 1. 6. PRUNE PLANTS AS NECESSARY — PER STANDARD NURSERY PRACTICE. 9. HOME OWNER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTENANCE AFTER EXPIRATION OF THE 1 YEAR WARRANTY. 10. PLANTS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY PLANTED UPON ARRIVAL AT SITE. PROPERLY HEEL—IN MATERIALS IF NECESSARY. 11. FIELD ADJUST TREES TO FIT UTILITY LOCATIONS AND ANY CHANGES THAT MAY HAVE OCCURED TO THE GRADING PLAN. 12. BOULEVARD TREES SHALL BE PLANTED A DISTANCE AT LEAST SIX FEET BUT LESS THAN TWELVE FEET FROM BEHIND THE CURB. ----------- ;-1< 1 I I I I n I A i `L•- / I m O L-------- J %_j / 3 r - - - - - - - - - - - -- L- I I ---- T ------- i r ---------I L------------ / I I I I I r I I I I I I I I I I ---J L -------J L -------J/ / L -----------J r ------------, I I I I ------T i---------� r ---------T r-------�\ J L --------J L----------------� 4 / I L ---------J I — J prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I C� J of a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws RUM � RI�/�( E of the State qj Minn ota, ppp�( BY: �1�/1 Ill MSS LAIC SURVEYORS & 124Ci�S PO Box 1044 Telephone: (763) 389-4476 CRAY J. CHUM, P.E. ��' Princeton, MN 55371 Fax: (763) 631-0376 Date 4/19/19 Uc. No. 23461 TAE SPIRIT HILLS SOUTH MONUMENT AND PLANTING PLAN CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA SHEET L2 OF n SHEE S P-4367.01 3 Z z a a_ LL O CID r n 0 0 LO LT r wa a Q CL CL E i 0 T 0 C a a� I o U o E N N Q1 � to Q / U DATE 1 GENERAL NOTES: 1. THE DEVELOPER WILL ARRANGE TO HAVE TREES PLANTED IN THE APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS AS SHOWN. TO PREVENT DAMAGE TREES WILL BE PLANTED ON EACH LOT AS THE HOMES ARE I CONSTRUCTED. 50 0 150 100 SCALE IN FT. REFERENCE NOTES: (j)TREES SHALL BE 2" ACI MINIMUM. LEGEND Ah PROPOSED TREE LOCATION 0 —SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET TREE PRESERVATION AREA W Z W Z W a REVISION F-------------- I � 1 I � 1 I 1 I 1 I i L---------- ---� -------- I I I I I I � I 2 I J s L--------- --� o m f ~ I� F--------� I I I I I I I I I / /--------------- I \ I I I I I I I I I i 2 I I I I I Il II ( II A I I \ r- I / 1 1 / I I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the StategrjyMM,nn ota. �ll Al r J. OCHUM, P.E. Date 4/19/19 LIC. No. 23461 -9' STEEL STAKE r� G G e / 8 Fi 1s• mm 18• POLYPROPYLENE OR - POLYETHYLENE (40 MIL 1-1/2• WIDE STRAP TYP.) DOUBLE STRAND 14 GA. WIRE - 3' O 120• INTERVAL (TYP.) TREE WRAP TO FIRST BRANCH _TURNBUCKLE WITH DOUBLE STRAND 014 GAUGE WIRE - 3 PER TREE 4•-6• LAYER OF SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH IN SAUCER -DCT M, PAST STAKE FINAL GRADE OF PLANT TO EOUAL ORIGINAL GRADE 2•.2•x30• STAKES SET 120' APART OUTSIDE THE BALL AT ANGLE - 3 PER TREE -BACKFILL WITH PLANTING SOIL MAINTAIN PEDESTAL OF NOTES TWO ALTERNATE METHODS OF TREE STAKING ARE SHOWN. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S OPTION TO STAKE TREES HOWEVER. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTAINING TREES IN A PLUMB POSITION THROUGHOUT THE GUARANTEE PERIOD. SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF HOLE PRIOR TO PLANTING DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL PLANTING NOTES: 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ONE YEAR GUARANTEE OF ALL PLANT MATERIALS. THE GUARANTEE BEGINS ON THE DATE OF THE OWNER'S ACCEPTANCE OF THE INITIAL PLANTING. REPLACEMENT PLANT MATERIALS SHALL ALSO HAVE A ONE YEAR GUARANTEE COMMENCING UPON PLANTING. 2. ALL PLANTS TO BE NORTHERN -GROWN AND HARDY. PLANTS TO BE INSTALLED AS PER STANDARD AAN PLANTING PRACTICES. 3. USE MINIMUM 12" LOAM PLANTING SOIL ON TREES. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATIONS WITH ALL UTR)TIES PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF PLANTS. 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL WATER ALL NEW PLANTS UNTIL ACCEPTED BY BY THE OWNER. 6. STAKING OF TREES OPTIONAL; REPOSITION IF NOT PLUMB AFTER ONE YEAR. 7. WRAP ALL SMOOTH -BARKED TREES -FASTEN TOP AND BOTTOM. REMOVE BY APRIL 1. B. PRUNE PLANTS AS NECESSARY - PER STANDARD NURSERY PRACTICE. 9. HOME OWNER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTENANCE AFTER EXPIRATION OF THE 1 YEAR WARRANTY. 10. PLANTS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY PLANTED UPON ARRIVAL AT SITE. PROPERLY HEEL -IN MATERIALS IF NECESSARY. 11. FIELD ADJUST TREES TO FIT UTTUTY LOCATIONS AND ANY CHANGES THAT MAY HAVE OCCURED TO THE GRADING PLAN. 12. BOULEVARD TREES SHALL BE PLANTED A DISTANCE AT LEAST SIX FEET BUT LESS THAN TWELVE FEET FROM BEHIND THE CURB. 14' 8 00 --_ � I I --- I '01 I I / F----------� L/ ----- — % V /f / n I > I---------- / I --- `\ I L ----------- J ✓ / I I A / \L- / _ J 1 i L-----------� / I � I I I I I I I / I UESIGNm BY. CJJ DR" Of: RUM RIVER SPIRIT HILLS SOUTH M...SS — _. _. .... VSYORle 8ENGINffi2S P., PO Box 1044 Telephone: (763) 369-4476 TAE Prineeron,MN 55371 F-(763)631-0376 F ----- I � I I I I I i I I � I L ----------- J 0 > I m r ;;g��r,�II 0 I I I 0 L------------ 0 J F--e---------� I I I i I PLANTING PLAN I CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA X P -4367.01 RUM RIVER `�S LAND SURVEYORS & L1V'GMEERS P.O. Box 1044, Princeton, MN 55371 / Phone: 763/389-4476 / Fax: 763/427-0520 April 8, 2019 City of Monticello Community Development 505 Walnut Street Monticello, MN 55362 Dear Ms. Angela Schumann: A tree survey was conducted on January 22, 2019 for Spirit Hills South Single Family Development located on PID 155152000020 within the City of Monticello. The landscape consists of rolling hills scattered with shrubs and tree canopies lining the northern, southern, and eastern parcel boundary. The shrubs scattered throughout the middle of the parcel are mainly evergreens and Siberian elms. The southern tree line is dominated by boxelders, hackberries, and black cherries. Between the scattered shrubs and the southern tree line a dense thicket of boxelder new growth. The northern tree line is dominated by oaks. The eastern tree line consists of boxelders, elms, and new growth oak. As specified in the Monticello Subdivision Ordinance 11-4-1.(B).12, trees were identified and tagged. The identified trees with their diameter and tag number are listed in the table below. Tag number Tree species Diameter 405 Hackberry 9 406 Hackberry 12 407 Black cherry 18 408 Black cherry 7 409 Hackberry 11 410 Hackberry 8 411 Hackberry 6 412 Hackberry 9 413 Hackberry 6 414 Black cherry 8 415 Hackberry 10 416 Hackberry 12 417 Hackberry 7 418 Hackberry 10 419 Hackberry 8 420 Hackberry 8 421 Black cherry 8 422 Black cherry 6,8 Tag number Tree species Diameter 423 Black cherry 7 424 Ironwood 6 425 Black cherry 13 426 Red oak 18 427 Red eastern cedar 13 428 Red eastern cedar 8 429 Buroak 24 430 Hackberry 15 431 Hackberry 8 433 Buroak 15 434 Buroak 10 435 Buroak 11 436 Buroak 6 437 Buroak 7 438 Buroak 30 439 Buroak 28 Table 1. Trees identified on site No canopy trees larger than 36" in diameter were found on site, nor were there any understory trees larger than 10" in diameter on the property. The 1991 aerial photo from Google Earth show this site was previously farm land, but trees still lined the property lines. Most of the area was previously disturbed, and the abundance of boxelders and new growth on the property agrees with this observation. If you have any questions, please contact me at (763) 852-0496 or kacifnhaa-inc.com Sincerely, Kaci Fisher Environmental Specialist Rum River Land Surveyors & Engineers RUM RIVER 4 LAND SURVEYORS St ENGINEERS 2 0 U 0. z W m U) 0 00 a a M z U) J 0 CL a LU z z 0 M W to T LU Z) z W a a z W x 0 I wsb May 1, 2019 Ms. Angela Schumann Community Development Director City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1 Monticello, MN 55362 Re: Spirit Hills South Plan Review City Project No. 2019-11 WSB Project No. R-013917-000 Dear Ms. Schumann: We have reviewed the preliminary plat, street and utility plans and Stormwater Management Plan dated April 8, 2019 as prepared by Rum River Land Surveyors and Engineers and offer the following comments: Preliminary Plat 1. Several lots have building pads encroaching or very close to the Northern Natural gas line easement that may limit flexibility with building construction. Lot 6, Block 3 and Lot 5, Block 5, among others, appear to have building pads encroaching on the gas line easement. 2. The gravel pad for the electrical tower site encroaches on Lot 2, Block 2. The applicant shall indicate how this encroachment will be removed. 3. City staff indicates that the trail within Outlot A shall be shifted to the side yard between Lots 5 and 6, Lot 1. 4. 10 -foot wide side yard drainage and utility easements are noted for each lot on Lots 2-6, Block 4 and Lots 4-6, Bloc, instead of the required 6 -foot easement. The applicant shall identify why additional easement is needed as storm sewer is not located in these areas. 5. Lots 1-5, Block 1 have the incorrect rear yard dimension noted. Existing Conditions and Removal Plan 6. The existing 12" storm sewer in the southeast corner of the plat shall be removed and replaced with the proposed grading and storm sewer. Gradinq, Drainaqe and Erosion Control Plan Wright County will be taking over jurisdiction of Fenning Avenue and will require a right turn lane be constructed at the access point to the development based on MnDOT access management guidelines. The County plans to complete improvements to the roadway in 2021. The developer shall grade the right turn lane with the development and the County will pave it. Future grades for the Fenning Avenue shall be considered in the grading design of the Fenning Avenue trail, access points from Fenning Avenue and adjacent lots impacts. C:\Users\Jennifer.Burrows\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\4HYUK2V2\Exh P.Ltr-a-schumann Spirit Hills Review REV.DOCX Spirit Hills South Plan Review May 1, 2019 Page 2 The City is coordinating with Wright County on these matters. 8. Provide verification from Northern Natural gas regarding acceptance of proposed grading and clearance requirements in the yard and street areas that encroach on the gas easement. 9. Provide elevations for each lot corner. 10. Provide elevations of the lowest opening for off-site structures on the adjacent lots along the east side of the plat. 11. It appears several yard slopes are greater than the maximum 4:1 slope requirement for the following, but not limited to, lots: Block 1, lot 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8 Block 3, lot 1, 3, 4, 5, 11, 15 Block 4, lot 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8 Block 5, lot 5, 6, 7, 8 Block 6, lot 1, 2 Please revise to meet the 4:1 slope requirement. 12. Drainage swales shall be contained within drainage and utility easements along side yards between lots so that drainage is not draining directly to the adjacent home outside of the easements. This appears to be the case on Lots 1-4, Block 1: Lots 1,2, Block 6; Lots 1-2, 7- 8,15, Block 3; Lots 1-3, Block 5. Please review all lots to comply with this requirement and provide defined drainage swales within the easements. 13. Label all EOF elevations and drainage routes with drainage arrows. 14. A minimum vertical separation of 1.5 feet must be provided between the EOF and the low opening of a building. Block 3, Lot 15 does not meet this requirement. Provide documentation that all lots meet this requirement. 15. All drainage swales should have a minimum 2% grade and noted as such on the plans. 16. Show HWL and storage volume for each of the filtration ponds on the grading plan. 17. Driveway locations and grades shall be shown on the plan in addition to the lot tabulation table. 18. The typical section should be shown on the grading plan and street and storm sewer plan sheets. Draintile shall be included in the typical section. 19. All flared -end section shall include riprap. 20. Verify that each lot has a minimum 30 -foot yard area at a maximum 8:1 slope. 21. Show storm sewer maintenance access routes for structures outside of the street. Sanitary Sewer and Watermain Plan Spirit Hills South Plan Review May 1, 2019 Page 3 22. Label lots and blocks. 23. Provide vicinity or location maps on the street and utility sheets with reference/shading on the map for that sheet's plan view. 24. Label garage and low floor elevations. 25. Show the gas main depth, size and type in the profile view. 26. Gate valves located at intersections shall be in line with the right of way. 27. Hydrants from the 12" watermain shall be placed at high and low points for air relief and cleanout purposes. 28. All hydrants shall be located at property lines with a maximum 500 -foot spacing. 29. All watermain bend degrees shall be noted on the plans and not exceed 45 degrees. 30. It appears that a few sanitary manholes could be eliminated to keep within a reasonable distance along centerline and maintain 10 -feet of separation from the watermain and storm sewer mains. 31. All sewer services shall have service lengths labeled and wye stationing. 32. All water services shall have curb stop locations with stations identified. 33. Hydrants, gate valves and all fittings shall have stationing identified Street and Storm Sewer Plan 34. Label lots and blocks. 35. Provide vicinity or location maps on the street and utility sheets with reference/shading on the map for that sheet's plan view. 36. Show all storm sewer in profile view. There are missing segments, including the backyard areas and some CB leads. 37. The minimum storm sewer size required is 15 -inch. The plans shows several 12 -inch pipe that do not meet this requirement. 38. The minimum catch basin depth is 4 -ft. Several catch basins do not meet this requirements. Plans should be revised to meet this requirement. 39. Show storm sewer structure sizes on the profile view. 40. Wildwood Blvd should be extended to the west to serve the property to the north as a public street access. 41. The proposed sidewalks are to have a 6" depth of concrete per the city detail for new development and shall be located 1 foot inside the right of way. Spirit Hills South Plan Review May 1, 2019 Page 4 42. Extend sidewalk to connect to the existing sidewalk along Wildwood Way. 43. Label street widths as 32 -foot face to face of curb and the right of way width. 44. Include the typical section on each plan sheet. 45. Show the driveway locations. 46. Identify locations of conduit crossings for private utilities in the joint trench and for street lighting. 47. Add notes for adjoining plan sheet numbers at intersections. 48. Add all structure numbers at intersections. 49. Label all street profile grades on all sheets. 50. Show the gas main depth, size and type in the profile view. 51. The storm sewer pipe run between CB 100 and CB 101 shall be within the street and not located in the boulevard. 52. Provide a table identifying how the vertical curve data was determined for stopping sight distance. 53. The maximum street grade is 8% per city standards. Bison Ave does not meet this standard. 54. Verify there is a maximum 2% approach grade for the first 100 -feet of any intersection approach. Stormwater Manaqement Plan 55. The site was planned to drain to the Hillside Farms development stormwater pond located to the south. This pond was sized to provide water quality and rate control. The volume control requirement of 1.1" off new impervious must be constructed onsite. Due to clay soils onsite, filtration is proposed to meet the volume control standard. Three filtration basins are shown to meet the volume capacity, however the impervious areas need to be routed to these basins. The current runoff routed to the pond areas is back yard drainage. Streets and front yards are routed to storm sewer that runs directly to the Hillside pond and therefore not treated prior to discharge. 56. Pretreatment is required prior to discharge into the filtration basin. A 4 -foot deep sump manhole is required in the last structure that drains the street to a filtration basin. 57. Show draintile in the filtration basin detail on sheet 2. 58. Provide a breakout of the volume treated for each filtration basin 59. Provide rational method calculations confirming adequacy of the storm sewer design for the 10 -year storm event and connection to the existing storm sewer system. Calculations should adhere to the following guidelines: Spirit Hills South Plan Review May 1, 2019 Page 5 a. The rational method runoff coefficient (c) is designated by land use and should be assigned a value no less than 0.7. b. Minimum allowable velocity in closed conduit = 3.0 fps c. Maximum allowable velocity in closed conduit = 12.0 fps 60. An NPDES/SDS Construction Storm Water General Permit (CSWGP) shall be provided with the grading permit or with the building permit application for review, prior to construction commencing. 61. A stormwater maintenance agreement will be required. A template will be provided to the applicant. HydroCAD Model 62. The Atlas 14 distribution should be MSE type 3 for the HydroCAD model. 63. Provide a proposed drainage map showing the site grading and improvements, labeling the filtration ponds. 64. In HydroCAD, add a starting elevation to the filtration basin ponds to be the invert of the beehive. 65. Soil borings onsite indicate type D soils, the model should reflect this. 66. Provide explanation for using different exfiltration rates (0.45 in/hr and 0.8 in/hr) for the filtration basins. 67. Provide details for outlet control structure. 68. In HydroCAD, model the directly connected impervious should be model separated, not a weighted CN. SWPPP 69. If this project required an environmental review and/or any stormwater mitigation measures as part of environmental, endangered species, archeological or other required reviews, then include mitigation measures in the SWPPP. If not, include a statement that a review and/or mitigation measures are not required. (Part 5.16) 70. For the proposed filtration areas, include information in the SWPPP that the filter media will not be installed until the drainage area to each basin is stabilized; or, if the filter media is installed before the drainage area is fully stabilized, implement rigorous erosion prevention and sediment controls to keep all runoff and sediment out of the filtration practice. (Part 17.3). 71. Slopes that are 3:1 and ditches with a continuous slope of greater than 2% require stabilization with more robust controls than type 1 mulch. Describe how these areas will be stabilized in temporary erosion control applications. 72. Include estimated quantities for all proposed temporary and permanent erosion and sediment control practices. (Part 5.7) Trail Plan Spirit Hills South Plan Review May 1, 2019 Page 6 73. Trail profiles shall meet ADA requirements. The 9% trail grades noted are non-compliant. 74. The developer shall construct all trail segments, including the trail along Fenning Ave, as part of the development. 75. Provide defined drainage swales on either side of the trails located within Outlot A and B. 76. ADA compliant pedestrian ramps shall be provided where the trail connects at Wildwood Blvd. 77. Extend the Fenning Avenue trail to the driveway located on the adjacent property to the north. 78. The trail plans show storm sewer and sanitary sewer extensions that should be include with the sanitary sewer/watermain and street/storm sewer plan sheets. 79. The north arrow direction is incorrect. OTHER 80. Provide an overall utility layout sheet for all utilities (storm sewer, sanitary sewer and watermain). 81. Check for and identify any utility mainline and service crossing conflicts. 82. Provide a street lighting plan. 83. Mailbox locations will need to be coordinated with the post master and City street superintendent. 84. A note should be added to the plans that the City will not be responsible for any additional costs incurred that is associated with variations in the utility as -built elevations. These elevations shall be verified in the field prior to construction Please have the applicant provide a written response addressing the comments above. Please give me a call at 612-360-1304 if you have any questions or comments regarding this letter. Sincerely, WSB Shibani K. Bisson, PE Senior Project Manager Wright County Highway Department 3600 Braddock Ave NE Buffalo, MN 55313 Ph: (763)682-7383 Fax: (763)682-7313 VIRGIL HAWKINS, P.E. Highway Engineer CHAD HAUSMANN, P.E. Assistant Highway Engr. STEVE MEYER Maintenance Superintendent JEREMY CARLSON, P.L.S. Right -of -Way Agent SARA BUERMANN, P.E. Traffic Engineer May 16, 2019 Mr. Mathew Leonard, P.E. Monticello City Engineer 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1 Monticello, MN 55362 RE: Preliminary Plan Review — Spirit Hills Dear Mr. Leonard, We have received the Preliminary Plans for the proposed Spirit Hills development along Fenning Avenue NE in the City of Monticello. We appreciate your invitation to offer comments on this pending development as Fenning Avenue NE is in the process of transferring jurisdiction to the County (and will be designated as County Road 118 within the next month or so). We offer the following comments: 1) It is our understanding that the City of Monticello has approved the access location along Fenning Avenue NE and conditions for access as part of the Planning Commission and City Council approval of the development. 2) It is our understanding that the City has required that a right -turn lane be constructed along Fenning Avenue (soon to be CR 118) as part of a condition for the new access. We would recommend that a by-pass lane be constructed for this access instead of a right -turn lane. Most of the traffic going to/from this access will be from the north, so a by-pass lane would offer the best safety mitigation for the impacts of the new access. Alternatively, a dedicated left turn lane could be constructed (if there is an issue with right-of-way for constructing the by-pass lane). 3) The proposed pedestrian trail should be constructed completely within the outer 15 feet of the roadway right-of-way along Fenning Avenue NE (future CR 118). 4) Any proposed work within the CR 118 right of way will require a Right of Way permit from our office. 5) No increase to the peak runoff to the CR 118 right of way should result from this development project. Please contact us at 763-682-7383 if you have any questions or need further clarification. Sincerely, Virgil G. Hawkins, P.E. County Highway Engineer Cc: Chad Hausmann, Assistant County Engineer Sara Buermann, Traffic Engineer An Equal Opportunity Employer Council Agenda: 05/28/2019 4C. Consideration of authorizing members of the Citv Council to participate in the I-94 Coalition lobbving effort July 24-25, 2019 in Washington D.C. at an estimated cost of $1,000 per participant (JO) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The I-94 Coalition is gearing up again to send a team of representatives to Washington DC on July 24 & 25, 2019 to help lobby for improvements to the I-94 corridor. As a member of the coalition, Monticello again has the opportunity to send one or more representatives to be part of the team going to Washington DC. Al. Budget Impact: City Council travel budget is sufficient to cover this request which is estimated at $1,000 per participant. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to authorize one or more members of Council to participate in the effort. 2. Motion to not approve the contribution and return the funds to the donors. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends alternative 1. It is up to Mayor Stumpf and City Council to decide who should go. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • None CITYOF Monticeflo Council Connection May 28, 2019 CITY OF M %4i6eflo DEPARTMENET OF BUILDING SAFTY Commercial Construction Update The commercial projects are starting to move some dirt, which is always nice to see at this time of year. The new fire station is underway. We are having a preconstruction meeting on Wednesday with Kinghorn Construction, for the new Monticello RV Center. They will be moving dirt as soon as possible. Rivertown Residential Suites started on the footings last week. This project will be in full swing this week. Also, the school district is updating the ventilation system at Pinewood elementary this summer. We have a few new buildouts at certain tenant spaces. Among the new buildouts is a new Mexican grocery/deli store at 512 Pine Street. Residential Update A quick summary of the developments and the number of lots available are as follows. • Featherstone 3rd: 12 lots available, and roads are being installed for the 4th • Spirit Hills: 3 building sites for 21 dwelling units. • Hillside Farms: 1 lot available. • Autumn Ridge Villas: 27 lots available. • Timber Ridge: 0 lots available, we are finishing up the last few units. • Carlisle Village 6t": 16 building sites with 72 townhome sites available. Single family home construction thus far this year: 4 detached SFH; 13 single family attached homes, with a total construction valuation of $ 3,121,900. The total valuation of all new construction thus far this year is at $8,471,983. Blighted properties So far this year we have issued 17 violation notices, compared to 23 in 2018. Rental License Program update This year has been another strong year thus far for compliant rental units. We only have 4 properties that have yet to apply for their license. We are working with those property owners, and we should receive their applications in the next few days. Also, we only have 15 properties that have not passed their inspections yet this year. Staff believes this number is down compared to other years. In summary, new construction has been down from the last few years, but we have a few more projects we are working on that will become reality in a short period of time. I believe we will end the year with a strong push of new construction. CITY OF �r1t1C��� ............� Transactions April 2019, the DMV processed 13,710 transactions 2,533 more than April 2018. DMV year -to date revenue is $277,041.11 an increase of $26,983.34 or 10.8% over the same period last year. Please see the following graphs for more detail. $80,000 $70,000 $60,000 $50,000 $40,000 $30,000 $20,000 $10,000 16,000 14,000 12,000 10,000 8,000 6,000 4,000 2,000 $300,000 $250,000 $200,000 $150,000 $100,000 $50,000 60,000 50,000 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 DMV Revenue Comparison Apr 2011 Apr 2012 Apr 2013 Apr 2014 Apr 2015 Apr 2016 Apr 2017 Apr 2018 Apr 2019 DMV Transaction Comparison 13,710 Apr 2011 Apr 2012 Apr 2013 Apr 2014 Apr 2015 Apr 2016 Apr 2017 Apr 2018 Apr 2019 DMV Year -to -Date Revenue Comparison yL//,U41 Apr 2011 Apr 2012 Apr 2013 Apr 2014 Apr 2015 Apr 2016 Apr 2017 Apr 2018 Apr 2019 DMV Year -to -Date Transaction Comparison 50,649 Apr 2011 Apr 2012 Apr 2013 Apr 2014 Apr 2015 Apr 2016 Apr 2017 Apr 2018 Apr 2019 CITY OF 04keflo HI -WAY LIQUORS Sales through April 30, 2019 Attached is the data for total sales in each major category through the end of April 2019. Hi -Way Liquors Sales Report 4/30/2019 Total Sales Month 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 CYM-LYM Y -T -D Jan $ 316,280.10 $ 300,631.85 $ 296,838.64 $ 302,114.52 $ 328,004.13 $ 355,029.76 $ 380,425.45 $ 364,675.32 $ 356,295.18 $ 403,520.92 $ 413,534.20 2.5% 2.5% Feb 284,988.38 285,584.50 315,239.00 307,385.41 337,923.99 333,487.18 347,777.77 362,746.98 364,836.39 390,050.52 408,769.22 4.8% 3.6% Mar 318,050.39 324,062.21 335,032.60 388,195.21 408,071.17 377,391.62 388,003.16 401,256.91 417,005.50 473,811.33 477,467.15 0.8% 2.6% Apr 346,738.34 369,112.88 389,543.24 347,321.09 388,395.50 389,250.82 421,280.89 428,729.44 448,141.63 467,192.12 489,072.87 4.7% 3.1% May 384,337.08 399,489.67 409,309.12 433,829.01 436,195.21 498,095.67 523,401.05 482,917.95 503,867.81 549,206.70 - Jun 381,782.23 377,458.15 409,726.07 461,423.68 440,255.04 426,392.73 474,203.81 470,585.33 521,559.76 561,287.34 Jul 430,838.23 466,122.69 466,738.15 447,452.18 485,459.76 479,174.06 542,973.27 527,519.46 563,935.31 571,270.49 Aug 383,523.07 386,245.30 408,734.83 445,158.94 503,181.84 484,955.71 470,505.22 462,669.36 497,201.21 544,029.21 Sep 346,900.80 346,557.62 373,719.64 390,399.33 379,381.19 397,495.82 439,444.29 448,218.93 501,126.67 481,663.70 Oct 360,742.04 375,367.40 365,702.14 372,676.23 396,328.87 409,967.74 460,096.82 454,442.30 461,549.38 467,600.32 Nov 341,875.49 360,661.96 376,855.40 421,960.12 424,038.37 465,299.53 474,241.74 444,533.08 495,519.24 527,900.06 Dec 454,982.63 485,617.01 505,482.70 527,865.36 518,379.58 549,200.76 569,707.38 605,509.16 629,143.57 652,695.25 Total $ 4,351,038.78 $ 4,476,911.24 $ 4,652,921.53 $ 4,845,781.08 $ 5,045,614.65 $ 5,165,741.40 $ 5,492,060.85 $ 5,453,804.22 $ 5,760,181.65 $ 6,090,227.96 $ 1,788,843.44 Change $ 283,853.59 $ 125,872.46 $ 176,010.29 $ 192,859.55 $ 199,833.57 $ 120,126.75 $ 326,319.45 $ (38,256.63) $ 306,377.43 $ 330,046.31 $ (4,301,384.52) Change 7.0% 2.9% 3.9% 4.1% 4.1% 2.4% 6.3% -0.7% 5.6% 5.7% -70.6% $700,000 $600,000 $500,000 $400,000 $300,000 $200,000 $100,000 R Monthly Hi -Way Sales Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec ■ 2009 ■ 2010 ■ 2011 ■ 2012 ■ 2013 ■ 2014 ■ 2015 ■ 2018 ■ 2019 Hi -Way Liquors Sales Report 4/30/2019 Beer Month 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 CYM-LYM Jan $ 157,849.78 $ 146,246.32 $ 143,906.08 $ 149,406.45 $ 160,903.32 $ 173,814.13 $ 191,370.26 $ 176,483.68 $ 174,846.99 $ 198,202.11 $ 197,270.15 -0.5% Feb 137,055.23 140,624.54 150,075.08 150,589.28 162,865.75 161,168.63 164,508.11 175,055.27 179,346.12 187,042.58 196,211.84 4.9% Mar 155,196.13 164,157.70 163,595.55 203,957.25 192,607.52 185,325.68 192,955.79 199,141.66 208,926.70 233,971.24 232,963.84 -0.4% Apr 178,834.20 189,978.23 194,504.16 179,486.77 186,134.31 198,195.77 219,756.39 228,133.10 234,069.51 224,348.27 244,892.28 9.2% May 210,097.48 223,678.47 208,963.65 227,664.73 234,738.30 256,188.77 259,306.91 250,403.11 262,275.25 306,245.55 Jun 207,793.83 206,043.42 224,769.03 259,671.21 243,389.79 238,322.11 263,421.95 263,264.15 296,531.85 309,163.93 Jul 229,199.79 260,971.50 258,734.60 253,648.64 273,319.54 265,555.32 301,867.65 296,513.68 315,848.83 314,343.95 Aug 203,222.86 211,996.32 216,546.53 242,179.20 281,577.25 267,802.95 253,141.21 250,255.41 268,173.42 292,626.23 Sep 183,586.32 183,865.70 199,170.24 208,974.88 202,213.80 211,854.94 233,215.56 238,333.55 270,898.13 257,557.44 Oct 179,873.10 190,893.27 180,043.06 187,386.57 191,764.20 210,454.13 234,882.09 224,253.93 228,484.62 230,112.85 Nov 154,584.13 168,265.14 171,866.27 195,276.37 192,162.71 202,081.91 207,055.40 213,333.23 222,993.99 238,870.03 Dec 190,655.19 203,080.13 216,560.71 224,952.83 217,491.21 234,178.12 241,996.27 253,223.11 271,457.72 281,924.05 Total $ 2,187,948.04 $ 2,289,800.74 $ 2,328,734.96 $ 2,483,194.18 $ 2,539,167.70 $ 2,604,942.46 $ 2,763,477.59 $ 2,768,393.88 $ 2,933,853.13 $ 3,074,408.23 $ 871,338.11 Change $ 121,411.43 $ 101,852.70 $ 38,934.22 $ 154,459.22 $ 55,973.52 $ 65,774.76 $ 158,535.13 $ 4,916.29 $ 165,459.25 $ 140,555.10 $ (2,203,070.12) Change 5.9% 4.7% 1.7% 6.6% 2.3% 2.6% 6.1% 0.2% 6.0% 4.8% -71.7% $350,000 $300,000 $250,000 $200,000 $150,000 $100,000 $50,000 II�11� PIIll I Monthly Beer Sales Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct ■ 2009 ■ 2010 ■ 2011 ■ 2012 ■ 2013 ■ 2014 lilt. 2015 ■ 2018 ■ 2019 Nov Dec Y -T -D -0.5% 2.1% 1.2% 3.3% Hi -Way Liquors Sales Report 4/30/2019 Liquor Month 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 CYM-LYM Jan $ 92,370.42 $ 91,472.50 $ 91,279.01 $ 93,085.69 $ 103,977.89 $ 113,943.25 $ 118,577.85 $ 118,211.20 $ 114,509.99 $ 133,589.33 $ 142,171.51 6.4% Feb 83,513.27 85,484.92 96,541.21 92,489.93 106,387.16 107,609.55 112,198.85 113,060.59 117,361.15 128,952.50 142,327.58 10.4% Mar 88,569.65 93,133.42 101,047.04 112,244.43 124,487.55 116,316.49 118,269.49 118,839.79 131,238.09 151,716.52 159,432.14 5.1% Apr 90,627.19 95,025.54 110,898.81 98,080.67 113,594.37 115,579.47 123,841.34 126,073.89 130,114.53 136,883.13 147,197.73 7.5% May 102,041.75 106,395.62 111,586.59 114,299.35 127,622.31 135,370.38 140,116.66 129,009.36 142,237.28 160,936.65 Jun 103,580.02 102,086.20 115,136.72 128,604.32 124,019.90 120,291.71 136,716.81 135,763.26 147,813.59 168,769.36 J u I 118,883.98 122,861.98 130,624.19 123,672.73 139,270.04 139,967.77 155,436.54 150,173.35 160,220.37 170,108.99 Aug 103,977.01 101,487.43 113,869.37 126,065.14 141,197.73 138,660.76 136,440.40 135,841.14 144,263.78 164,013.08 Sep 94,335.50 94,528.17 103,373.64 109,153.56 107,605.71 115,119.19 129,195.42 130,101.01 143,252.37 147,649.35 Oct 102,236.90 102,983.14 103,533.14 106,326.73 116,677.74 124,271.15 140,198.97 128,290.50 145,864.34 150,852.02 Nov 90,996.73 102,298.02 105,501.75 120,127.29 126,412.24 134,241.85 132,261.11 134,208.12 149,468.96 167,360.12 Dec 143,684.12 153,690.60 159,717.50 172,370.96 175,523.36 184,746.26 190,944.24 205,335.83 213,217.73 229,121.92 Total $ 1,214,816.54 $ 1,251,447.54 $ 1,343,108.97 $ 1,396,520.80 $ 1,506,776.00 $ 1,546,117.83 $ 1,634,197.68 $ 1,624,908.04 $ 1,739,562.18 $ 1,909,952.97 $ 591,128.96 ChangE $ 85,465.80 $ 36,631.00 $ 91,661.43 $ 53,411.82 $ 110,255.21 $ 39,341.83 $ 88,079.85 $ (9,289.64) $ 114,654.14 $ 170,390.79 $ (1,318,824.01) ChangE 7.6% 3.0% 7.3% 4.0% 7.9% 2.6% 5.7% -0.6% 7.1% 9.8% -69.1% Monthly Liquor Sales $250,000 $200,000 $150,000 $100,000 — i $50,000 — Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun 4- 11 Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec ■ 2009 ■ 2010 ■ 2011 ■ 2012 ■ 2013 ■ 2014 ■ 2015 ■ 2018 ■ 2019 Y -T -D 6.4% 8.4% 7.2% 7.3% Hi -Way Liquors Sales Report 4/30/2019 Wine Month 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 CYM-LYM Y -T -D Jan $ 41,810.19 $ 43,324.18 $ 48,437.59 $ 50,238.83 $ 54,949.83 $ 59,391.16 $ 61,128.65 $ 60,454.56 $ 57,275.16 $ 60,047.20 $ 61,183.52 1.9% 1.9% Feb 39,410.85 42,230.84 52,847.05 54,642.27 60,573.12 57,228.51 62,600.47 64,797.38 58,664.45 62,027.36 58,391.94 -5.9% -2.0% Mar 45,525.38 46,165.18 54,639.16 57,735.22 77,810.58 66,425.24 67,121.51 71,840.82 64,286.75 74,221.20 70,209.75 -5.4% -3.3% Apr 48,303.48 61,146.04 62,289.18 57,973.74 79,736.19 63,101.05 63,285.56 61,268.24 69,415.79 93,299.96 83,324.61 -10.7% -5.7% May 40,963.86 45,733.08 68,701.95 78,740.40 62,491.07 92,083.62 109,512.94 87,333.35 82,724.29 61,684.97 Jun 37,522.00 44,211.14 49,089.65 56,607.74 59,523.15 54,270.56 59,036.14 54,889.39 58,623.08 61,777.09 Jul 41,813.65 48,334.93 49,664.45 54,467.20 57,115.44 57,743.98 66,029.11 60,750.62 64,034.24 64,494.29 Aug 41,333.00 46,871.28 53,172.68 61,825.30 64,057.61 62,446.04 63,546.01 60,015.78 66,304.12 67,701.51 Sep 39,798.20 47,859.52 53,916.37 60,317.17 59,121.12 59,409.30 62,210.27 65,294.31 68,220.79 59,923.84 Oct 48,422.79 58,081.87 60,949.40 66,423.82 75,606.28 63,659.41 70,038.32 89,005.29 70,516.61 70,894.54 Nov 66,331.86 71,928.30 85,933.28 97,249.52 96,824.40 117,402.23 122,947.90 83,896.45 109,969.88 107,567.02 Dec 84,285.84 101,676.19 109,267.01 116,610.70 113,008.24 115,617.50 120,274.96 129,536.28 124,115.79 120,746.12 Total $ 575,521.10 $ 657,562.55 $ 748,907.77 $ 812,831.91 $ 860,817.03 $ 868,778.60 $ 927,731.84 $ 889,082.47 $ 894,150.95 $ 904,385.10 $ 273,109.82 ChangE $ 83,338.23 $ 82,041.45 $ 91,345.22 $ 63,924.14 $ 47,985.12 $ 7,961.57 $ 58,953.24 $ (38,649.37) $ 5,068.48 $ 10,234.15 $ (631,275.28) ChangE 16.9% 14.3% 13.9% 8.5% 5.9% 0.9% 6.8% -4.2% 0.6% 1.1% -69.8% Monthly Wine Sales $140,000 $120,000 — ■ 2009 ■ 2010 $100,000 ■ 2011 $80,000 , ■ 2012 $60,000 – ■ 2013 r ■ 2014 $40,000 ■ 2015 $20,000 ■ 2018 ■ 2019 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec $6.5 $6.0 $5.5 $5.0 tA C 0 $4.5 $4.0 $3.5 $3.0 Liquor Store Sales - Rolling 12 Month Periods D v v oCD < Z3 v v o D v v� o D v v� o Z3 v v o D v v� o D v v� o D v v o Z3 v v o D v v� o D v Q0 0 N N W � Cn 00 l0 CITY OF 04keflo MONTICELLO COMMUNITY CENTER Transactions and visits Year to date (04.30.19), the MCC processed 31,654 transactions compared to 34,861 transactions last year. The MCC year to date revenue is up from the previous year by $39,076, totaling $564,776. Year to date membership visits are up by 769, totaling 56,592 visits. Members are at a total of 5,253 compared to 5,878 last year at this time. MCC 4/30 YTD Activity 70000 60000 50000 40000 30000 20000 10000 0 YTD Transactions YTD Member Visits $600,000 $500,000 $400,000 $300,000 $200,000 $100,000 ■ 2017 ■ 2018 ■ 2019 MCC 4/30 YTD Revenue ■ 2017 ■ 2018 ■ 2019 MCC 4/30 Members 7000 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 a 2017 ■ 2018 ■ 2019 Program updates Council Connection - 05/28/19 The Monticello Community Center was awarded a grant from the Central MN Arts Board in the amount of $9,400 for artist D. Helene Woods to create and install a mural series on the exterior of the community center building designed to depict healthy activity opportunities available in the center. On Friday, April 12, one hundred children registered and participated in the Egg Dive event. Plastic eggs were dropped in the pool, kids collected the eggs and turned them in for prizes. The event was so popular we may choose to run two dates next spring. Adult Sports Leagues: Men's spring hockey is just wrapping up for the season. Nine teams participated this year. This hockey league is coordinated collaboratively with the ice arena and Monticello schools. Men's spring softball league began on April 23 and we have twelve teams participating this year. 200 people attended our first Pet Expo held on Saturday, May 11 in the gymnasium. We had twelve exhibitors offer a variety of products, pet adoptions, and demonstrations. The exhibitors were pleased with the community participation and would like to see this event continue annually. The Farmers Market opens for the outdoor season on Thursday, May 23 and we have a full house with twenty vendors participating. The popular Power of Produce kid's program will begin July 11 once more produce is available to purchase. Music on the Mississippi kicks off this season with the Shane Martin Band on Thursday, May 30. Several sponsors make the concerts possible. A big thank you to Central MN Arts Board, Monticello Lions, Bursch Travel, Costco of St. Cloud, Galindo Real Estate Group, All Elements, Quinlivan and Hughes, and CentraCare Health -Monticello. Council Connection - 05/28/19 Maintenance Updates MCC Maintenance staff secured quotes and coordinated with contractors to remove the old neon lighting system and update the Hi -Way Liquors sign to a LED lighting system.