IDC Agenda 08-20-1987
.
AGENDA
MONTICELLO INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
Thursday. August 20. 1987 - 7:00AM
City Hall
Members: President Harvey Kendall. Shelly Johnson. Bud Schrupp.
Arve Grimsmo. Rick Wo1fste11er. Jay Morrell. Dale
Lungwitz. Bruce Gagn~lius. Ron Hoglund. Don Smith.
Joel Winkelman. and 11ie Koropchak.
1. Call to Order.
2. Approval of the July 16. 1987 IDC Minutes.
3. Review of the IDC Financi1 Statements.
4. Introduction and Welcome of Rick Wo1fste11er. City Administrator.
as a Member of the IDC.
5. Consideration of Comparisons of Local Property Estimated Market
Values and Assessed Values.
6.
Consideration to
Date for the 1988 IDC Banquet.
7. Consideration to Set Goals and Objectives for 1988.
.
8.
Consideration for Recomme dation of Nominees for the Non-Profit
Revolving Loan Fund Board.
9.
Reports:
Beverage Processing Company
Joint-Airport ommission
Extended Area Services
10. Other Business.
11. Adjournment.
.
.
MINUTES
MONTICELLO INDUSTRIAL D VELOPMENT COMMITTE
Thursday, July 1 , 1987 - 7:00AM
City Hall
Members Present: Bud Schrupp, oel Winkelman, Ron Hoglund, Jay
Morrell, Dale Lungwitz, Don Smith, and Ollie
Koropchak.
1. Call to Order.
In absence of the IDC Presi ent and Vice President, Ollie
Koropchak called the IDC me ting to order at 7:11AM.
2. A rova1 of the June 18, 19 7 IDC Minutes.
Ron Hoglund made a motion t approve the June 18th IDC
minutes, seconded by Bud Sc rupp.
3. Reports.
a) Beverage Processing Com any - Koropchak reported she
had received a letter f om the consultants of the
beverage company asking for the City of Monticello's
best and final offer. lans are for the consultants
to present their findin s to the beverage processing
company board of directors the last week in July.
.
b) NAWCO Minnesota, Inc. - ith the completion of the
Tax Increment District process and the acquisition
of the land, constructio began July I, 1987 in the
Oakwood Industrial Park or the proposed approximate
28,000 sq ft facility.
c)
Data Card Corporation -
company's plans for expa
"hold" until the pending
Computers is resolved.
oropchak reported that the
sion have been placed on
acquisition by National
d) Joint Airport Commission - Koropchak reported
Tom Creighton, his assoc ate, and herself met and
began preliminary drafti g for a "request for proposal"
which is the criteria to follow for hiring a design
engineer. This request or proposal must meet Federal
and State requirements t insure funding participation.
e)
Monticello Ford Inc. - K
negotiating with Mr. Fla
of the property located
time no purchase agreeme
plans include the demoli
.
f) Directors of Monticello
that City Attorney Pring
organizational structure
powers of the City to Ie
ropchak reported the HRA was
e for the possible acquisition
t 249 West Broadway. At this
t has been executed. The HRA
ion of said property.
evelopment - Koropchak reported
e's opinion of the DMD's
was that it was not within the
ally create such an organization.
IDC Minutes - 7/16/87
.
g) Fulfillment Systems, Inci. - Koropchak asked the conunittee
if they were aware of FSi 's expansion in St. Cloud? The
conunittee responded of a! rental expansion. The conunittee
further questioned the i crease in the assessed property
valuation for FSI. The. onunittee members logic states
if the city's assessed p operty valuation increased then
the mill rate should dec ease. The committee requested
a comparison of assessed property values and taxes over
a five year period. Joe Winkelman recommended Rick
Wolfs teller be a member f the IDC and felt an "
explanation of the asses ment process would benefit the
IDC. Seconded by Dale L ngwitz.
4. Other Business.
Jay Morrell felt the IDC sho'
Koropchak and IDC members to
political issues, lobby, and
representatives before the b
Suggestion was to invite Dis
luncheon meeting in November
ld become more politically active.
watch for business and commerical
person to person contact with
ginning of the legislature session.
rict representatives to an IDC
.
Don Smith expressed a welcom
to the IDC, and sees the
the City Administrator.
of Rick Wolfsteller as a member
for community involvement from
Ron Hoglund reported the wom gathering signatures on the
extended area service pe~iti
5.
Adjournment.
By concensus of the IDC, the eeting adjourned.
~-~O'\o
Ollie Koropchak
Executive Secretary
Monticello Industrial Development Committee
.
MONTICELLO INDUSTRIAL EVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
FINANCIAL IREPORT
August 15, !1987
Prepared by 011i~ Koropchak
.
Security Federal Savings & Loan Money Market:
Balance, July 24, 1987
Wright County State Bank Money
Balance, July 31, 1987
Wright County State Bank
Balance, July 31, 1987
TOTAL IDC ACCOUNTS
.
.
$ 3,427.06
9.308.95
129.43
$12,865.44
MONTICELLO INDUSTRIAL EVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
!
. Security Federal Sa ings and Loan
Money Mar et
Balance, November 24, 1986 $ 3,309.33
DEPOSITS:
-0-
INTEREST:
December, 1986 $ 14.31
January, 1987 14.86
February, 1987 14.92
March, 1987 13.53
April, 1987 15.05
May, 1987 14.14
June, 1987 15.67
July, 1987 15.25
TOTAL INTEREST 117.73
TOTAL DEPOSITS AND INTEREST $ 117.73 $ 3,427.06
WITHDRAWALS:
-0-
. BALANCE, July 24, 1987 $ 3,427.06
.
MONTICELLO INDUSTRIAL D V ELOPMENT COMMITTEE
. Wright County St't e Bank
Money Mark t
Balance, October 31, 1986 $ 7,421. 02
DEPOSITS:
1986 Chamber Contribution
December 29, 1986 $ 2,500.00
1986 City Contribution
February 8, 1987 4,800.00
1987 Banquet
May 20. 1987 1,125.00
May 20. 1987 2.175.00
May 20. 1987 2.700.00
June 8, 1987 750.00
June 18, 1987 375.00
TOTAL DEPOSITS $ 4.425.00
INTEREST:
November, 1986 $ 29.72
December. 1986 32.96
January. 1987 44.57
February, 1987 34.76
March. 1987 15.29
April. 1987 15.36
. May. 1987 25.43
June. 1987 39.81
July. 1987 43.15
TOTAL INTEREST $ 281. 05
TOTAL DEPOSITS AND INTEREST $14,706.05 $22.127.07
WITHDRAWALS:
Transfer to Checking
11511 November 25, 1986 $ 300.00
City of Monticello
11512 February, 1987
1986 Salary 1 ,718.12
Transfer to Checking
11513 February 12. 1987 300.00
Transfer to Checking
11514 June 9. 1987 .500.00
TOTAL WITHDRAWALS $1 .818.12 $12,818.12 $ 9,308.95
BALANCE. July 31. 1987 $ 9,308.95
.
MONTICELLO INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
Wright County Stete Bank
Checking Accot nt
.
Balance, October 31, 1986
DEPOSITS:
Transfer from W.C.M.M.
November 26, 1986
Transfer from W.C.M.M.
February 13, 1987
Transfer from W.C.M.M.
June 10, 1987
TOTAL DEPOSITS
.
WITHDRAWALS:
TRAVEL, CONFERENCE, MEMBERSHI S
Ron Hoglund #267
December 22, 1986
MIDA It266
December 22, 1986
ENTERTAINMENT (Prospects)
Monticello Floral #264
November 25, 1986
River Inn #264
November 25, 1986
Ollie Koropchak #268
January 22, 1987
Ollie Koropchak #269
February 9, 1987
Ollie Koropchak #270
February 12, 1987
Dino's Catering #271
March 19, 1987
Ollie Koropchak #272
March 24, 1987
Ollie Koropchak #273
April 27, 1987
Ollie Koropchak #278
June 17, 1987
BANQUET
Monticello Office Products
June 9, 1987 #274
Wood type Minnesota
June 8, 1987 #275
Monticello Printing
June 1, 1987 #276
Monte Club
June 8, 1987 #277
MISCELLANEOUS
Monticello Printing #276
Letterhead & Envelopes
TOTAL WITHDRAWALS
-.
~. 300.00
I
300.00
1,500.00
2,100.00
25.00
95.00
63.60
217.35
15.00
16.47
73.50
50.00
30.34
28.75
14.77
10.36
48.00
31.06
1,324.75
68.58
~ 2,112.53
$ 2,100.00
$ 120.00
$ 509.78
$ 1,414.17
$ 68.58
$ 2,112.53
$ 150.96
$ 2,250.96
.
SERVICE CHARGE
November, 1986
December, 1986
January, 1987
February, 1987
March, 1987
April, 1987
May, 1987
June, 1987
July, 1987
TOTAL SERVICE CHARGE
1.00
.90
1.20
1.00
.80
.95
.80
1.55
.80
$ 9.00 $ 9.00
TOTAL WITHDRAWALS & SERVICE CRA GE
$ 2,121.53
BALANCE, July 31, 1987
.
.
Page 2
Checking Account
$ 2,121.53
$ 129.43
.
1987 IDe BANQUET SUMMARY
REVENUE:
98 tickets @ $75.00
EXPENSES:
Monticello Office Products
Woodtype Minnesota
Monticello Printing
Monte Club
Meal
Hors d'oeuvres
Bar (before)
Bar (after)
Gratuity
TOTAL EXPEN:sE
NET PROFIT
Prepared August 15. 1987
.
.
749.60
176.00
253.35
45.80
100.00
.324.75
$ 10.36
48.00
31. 06
$1.414.17
$7.350.00
$5.935.83
.
5.
CONSIDERATION OF COMPARISON'
MARKET VALUES AND ASSESSED
OF LOCAL PROPERTY ESTIMATED
ALUES.
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUN
Enclosed is the comparison
property market values and
Also, enclosed is a five ye
and the formulas used to de
Rick Wolfstel1er will be pr
any further questions.
IDC Agenda - 8/20/87
f twelve industrial and retail
ssessed values over five years.
r comparison of the mill rate
ermine the assessed values.
sent at the meeting to answer
6. CONSIDERATION TO SELECT THE DATE FOR THE 1988 IDC BANQUET.
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUm .
At several of the past IDC I eetings, the committee has talked
about a change of date for lur banquet. Previously, it has
been held the third Monday n May; however, with the ticket
sales down, difficulty in rl cruiting a speaker, and Maya
busy month in itself were Slme of the rationa1e,behind the
possible date change. The ommittee had asked myself to
write and invite Mr. Charli~ Herman of Josten's as the
potential 1988 guest speake . for this reason I would like
a decision on the date.
.
C 11988 C
JANUARY MAY SEPTEMBER
SMTWTF"S S M T W T F S 5M"fW'tf="S
I 2 I 2 ;]4567 I 2 3
3456789 8 9 10 II 12 13 14 45678910
10 II 12 13 14 15 16 15 16 , \7 18 19 20 21 II 12 13 14 15 16 17
17 18 19 20 21 22 23 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
24 25 26 27 28 29 30 29 30, 31 25 26 2728 29 30
31
FEBRUARY JUNE OCTOBER
123456 I 2 3 4 I
78910111213 5 6 7 8 9 10 II 2345678
14 15 16 17 18 19 20 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 9 10 II 12 \3 \4 \5
21 22 23 24 25 26 27 \9 20 21 22 23 24 25 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
28 29 2627 28 29 30 23 24 25 26 27 28 29
--l 30 31
;;r MARCH JULY NOVEMBER
in
Ui I 2 3 4 5 I 2 I 2 3 4 5
'" 6789101112 3 4 56789 6789101112
If 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 1011 12 13 \4 15 16 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 27 28 29 30
31
APRIL AUGUST DECEMBER
@ 1 2 123456 I 2 3
[ 3456789 7 8 9 10 II 12 13 45678910
10 II 12 13 14 15 16 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 II 12 13 14 15 16 17
!!l \7 18 19 20 21 22 23 2\ 22 23 24 25 26 27 18 19 20 2\ 22 23 24
24 25 26 27 28 29 30 28 29 30 31 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
<0
.
Year
~timated Market Value
Assessed Value,
'.
Fulfillment Systems, Inc. - Lauring Hi 1side 155-029-002060
002070
002080
1987
86
85
84
83
$1,152,400.00
1,078,400.00
33,100.00
24,000.00
24,000.00
$486,532.00
454,712.00
13,240.00
9,600.00
9,600.00
Bondus Corporation - Auditor's Subdivi ion 155-011-000031
Taxes
$43,609.34
36,004.56
1,076.48
786.78
811.86
1987 $ 522,300.00 $215,589.00 $19,323.88
86 264,700.00 104,821.00 8,299.84
85 261,900.00 103,617.00 8,424.58
84 261,900.00 108,117.00 8,860.84
83 261,905.00 111,119.00 9,396.90
Wrightco - Original Plat 155-010--018, 60
018; 80
1987 $ 766,500.00 $320,595.00 $28,735.92
86 564,500.00 233,735.00 18,507.40
85 564,500.00 233,735.00 19,003.84
84 560,100.00 232,815.00 19,080.60
83 540,650.00 229,803.00 19,433.54
. Larson Mfg. - Oakwood Industrial Park 155-018-001041
1987
86
85
84
83
$ 184,100.00
139,700.00
139,700.00
139,700.00
139,670
$ 70,163.00
51,071.00
51,071.00
55,571.00
58,558.00
$ 6,288.92
4,043.86
4,152.34
4,554.38
4,952.02
Perkins (De1rey Monticello Assoc.) - Original Plat
155-010-003010
1987
86
85
84
83
$ 331,300.00
289,700.00
289,700.00
289,700.00
289,687.00
$133,459.00
115,571. 00
115,571. 00
120,071.00
123,065.00
Security Federal - Original Plat 155 010-032010
1987
86
85
84
83
$ 370,500.00
70,400.00
130,700.00
1,434,049.00
1,434,049.00
$159,315.00
30,272.00
52,280.00
.
$11,962.34
9,151.04
9,396.50
9,840.54
10,407.12
$14,279.90
2,396.98
4,250.64
Year Estimated Market Value Assessed Value ~
. Coast to Coast - Original Plat 155-01 -031031
1987 $ 185,900.00 $ 70,937.00 $ 6,358.30
86 117,000.00 41,310.00 3,270.98
85 108.800.00 37,784.00 3,072.04
84 97,100.00 37,253.00 3,053.12
83 97,118.00 40,261. 00 3,474.72
Johnson's - Original Plat 155-010-052 31
1987 $ 149,700.00 $ 55,371. 00 $ 4,963.08
86 143,500.00 48,133.00 3,811. 22
85 143,500.00 48,133.00 3,913.46
84 131,900.00 48,689.00 3,990.36
83 131,408.00 51,520.00 4,356.84
Stella's - Original Plat 155-010-0351 1
1987 $ 65,900.00 $ 19,337.00 $ 1,733.24
86 37,800.00 10,584.00 838.06
85 37,800.00 10,584.00 860.54
84 32,200.00 10,948.00 897.26
83 32,170.00 12,868.00 1,088.20
Monticello Theater - Original Plat 15 -010-053050
. 1987 $ 202,800.00 $ 75,429.00 $ 6,760.94
86 180,100.00 63,673.00 5,041. 70
85 180,100.00 63,673.00 5,176.94
84 180,100.00 68,173.00 5,587.20
83 179,610.00 71,033.00 6,006.98
Flicker's - Original Plat 155-010-035 40
035 41
1987 $ 235,200.00 $ 92,136.00 $ 8,258.44
86 194,400.00 74,592.00 5,906.28
85 194,400.00 74,592.00 6,064.70
84 197,200.00 80,296.00 6,580.76
83 197,203.00 83,297.00 7,044.12
Foster's - Original Plat 155-010-0360 0
1987 $ 144,500.00 $ 51, 533.00 $ 4,619.06
86 95,000.00 28,892.00 2,287.70
85 95,000.00 28,892.00 2,349.06
84 81,200.00 28,220.00 2,312.80
83 81,120.00 31,192.00 2,637.78
.
. ,., co .-i ~ I~
,., lr) ,..... .-i N
co 0'\ 0'\ N ~
0'\
.-i M 0 \.0 ,.,
N N ,.,
~
CO
0'\
.-i
o
CO
lr)
,.,
N
~
,.,
,.....
,.....
.-i
lr)
,.,
,.,
,.....
,.,
,.....
o
,.,
,.,
\.0
lr)
0'\
.-i
CO
,.....
CO
0'\
.-i
N
M
,.,
.-i
N
l1"\
.-i
,.....
lr)
.-i
co
~
.-i
CO
~
co
,.,
~
~
,.,
M
'"
0'\
CO
w
u
W OM
U ,..
OM W
,.. CIl
W OM
CIl Q
OM
Q .-i
(\l
. >. .-i W
W 0 OM ~
c: >. 0 p.
;:I W ,..c::: CIl H
0 OM U 0 0
U U (f.l 0:: E-<
USE THESE NEW CODES WHEN WORKING N FIELD BOOKS IN 1987
FARM
~.CF
OACF (Up to 320 Acres)
~~~
OBCF (321 Up to 640 Acres)
'.
RESIDENTIAL
0-65,000 --------------------------- ~ H-C
32,600 - 65,000 -------------------- H2CR
Over 68,100 ------------------------ H3-R
Up to 32,500 ----------------------- H1CR
65,100 - 68,000 -------------------- H3CR
COMMONLY USED CLASSES
BACF ----------- 5% of 32,500
14% of next 32,500
18% of excess over 65,000
R -N ----------------- 34%
F -N ----------------- 10%
S -N ----------------- 20%
- -S ----------------- 21%
HACF ----------- 14% of 65,000
18% of Balance
.
DACF ----------- 18% over 65,000
OBCF ----------- 18% over 65,000
DCCF ----------- 18% over 65,000
-A-F ----------- 18%
H-CR ----------.... 18% of 65,000
28% of Excess
H1CR ----------- 18%
H2CR ----------- 18%
H3-R ----------- 28%
1t - -C -------------- 28% of 1st
60,000
43% Balance
- -C ----------------- -43%
~ - -I ---------- 28% of 1st 60,000
: 43% of Balance
----------------- 43%
----------------- -43%
(Machinery 33 1/3)
----------------- 40%
B-CR ----------- 5% of 32,500
18% of next 32,500 & 29% of excess
D-CR -----------
5% of 32,500
18% of next 32,500
28% of excess
ental Farm Houses - Use the following:
R--R -----------
R4-R -----------
411t-R ---~-------
28%
34%
40%"
R-CF (With Credit)
RA-F (Excluding House/1 Acre)
R--F (No Credit)
9-23-86
IDC Agenda - 8/20/87
.
7. CONSIDERATION TO SET GOALS AND OBJECTIVES FOR 1988.
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROU D.
City staff members are in ~he process of formulating their
"wish list" for considerat .,on of the proposed 1988 City
Budget. What do you see a1 the future needs for economic
development in the City of 'onticello? Initial considerations
I have listed are for part! 1 monies or monies for a community
brochure, Revolving Loan F~ d seed money. Joint-Airport
Commission; thereafter, ref nded by the grant, subdivision
of City industrial lots, an streetscape project.
My personal objectives are
Loan Fund Program and encou
offica1s and staff, local b
Fund Board on the importanc
community.
o initiate and market the Revolving
age cooperation among the city
nkers, and the Revolving Loan
of economic development for this
.
1. City officals and staff
A. Importance of econo ic development
B. Review industrial w ter and sewer rates
C. Review increased pr perty valuations and mill rates (taxes)
D. Subdivide City indu trial lots
E. Long range plan for development of II and 12 property as
outlined within the City's Comphensive Plan.
2. Bankers
A. Importance of econo ic development
B. Market the RLF
C. Willingness to part cipate in economic development deals
3. Revolving Loan Fund
A. Importance of econo ic develpment
B. Market the RLF
Consideration of IDC object ves
1. Market Monticello
2. Political Involvement
3. Review City Rates, City Taxes, and Zoning Ordinance for the
purpose of economic dev lopment.
4. Initiate Revolving Loan Fund
5. Extended Area Service
6. Joint Airport Commissio
7. City Brochure and maili
8. IDC Banquet
Remember, the above listed 0 jectives are for consideration
and to stimulate opinions.
.
.
IDC Agenda - 8/20/87
8. CONSIDERATION FOR RECOMMEND TION OF NOMINEES FOR THE NON-PROFIT
REVOLVING LOAN FUND BOARD.
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROU
On Tuesday, August 4, 1987,
Joel Winkelman, Harvey Kend
preliminary draft of the ap
loan fund program. The pur
jobs by providing a financi
interest rate loans to new
within the boundaries of th
The status of the current M
a non-profit organization b
Therefore, the revolving 10
the name Monticello Enterpr
I.R.S. code 50l(3)(c) which
sources are available. The
foundations and corporate 0
deductible contributions to
not have to pay income taxe
have more money available t
.
The revolving loan program
the public/private sector.
but it also must have direc
government, financial insti
the board, economic develop
credibility is established,
federal agency support is s
commitments are maintained,
monitored, and problems are
recommends the board member
professions with some sugge
Banker - Dale Lungwitz
Business -
Elected official - Warr
Accountant - Joel Winke
Attorney - Pringle or S
Community representativ
City Department Head -
Inorder to proceed with the
status a decision and accep
should be made. Input and
the IDC.
Items to cover for the Revo
.
1. Organization Struct
A. Non-profit orga
1. Members
2. Role
the subcommittee of Shelly Johnson,
II, and myself met to review the
lication process for the revolving
ose of the program is to create
1 incentive of long term/low
nd existing small industrial businesses
City of Monticello.
nticello Development Corporation is
t without the I.R.S. code of 50l(3)(c).
n program will be incorporated under
se Fund as a non-profit organization
ensures that a number of funding
tax-exempt status allows private
individual donors to make tax-
the organization. Because it does
, the non-profit organization will
place in the loan fund pool.
as a board of directors selected from
The board must be a working board,
access to the top levels of
utions, and business sectors. Through
ent financing policy is formulated,
marketing strategies are adopted,
cured, private sector lender
goals and results are set and
surfaced and solved. The subcommittee
be representatives from the following
ted individuals:
Fran Fair, or Dan Blonigan
Ridgeway or Con Johnson
application non-profit organization
ance of individuals on the board
ecommendations are hereby open to
Loan Fund Program.
.
B. Economic Developmen Director
A. Role
2. Revolving Loan Funding ources
3. Administrative and cation Process
IDC Agenda - 8/20/87
4. Financing Methods, Use f Proceeds, Terms and Conditions,
and Collateral.
.
.
.
9. REPORTS.
IDC Agenda - 8/20/87
BEVERAGE PROCESSING COMPAN: The week of August 10th, Mr~
Jim Simpson, Consultant fo' the Beverage Processing Company,
telephoned for further inf .rmation and clarification of
Monticello's water and sew r rates to complete their comparison
process. I referred the telephone call to John Simola,
Public Works Director, as e knows the industrial rates and
computations better than I. I have not heard further. I did
hear, Sartell, was one of 0 r competitors and that the un-
disclosed beverage company a be Canada Dry.
JOINT AIRPORT COMMISSION:
August 19, 1987 at the Mont
elect new officers, discuss
drafting of the "request fO'
for hiring a design enginee
State regulations to ensure
August, Tom Creighton, atto
associate, and myself will
for guideline information a
.
EXTENDED AREA SERVICE: In
Diane Wells, Minnesota Publ
communities have consolidat
in March of 1988. These he
St Paul between the commiss
Attorney Humphrey; they are
weeks. We are welcome to h
however, without filing for
silent. Intervention filin
Administrative Law Judge.
last to file petitions. Th
petitions; however, a commu
to participate in the conso
hearing for community input
four weeks, providing all g
will make a recommendation
for a final decision. The
to August 21, 1987. If Mon
we would be number 17 on th
Praque, Cambridge, and Nort
attorney for representation
the decision from the March
guidelines for the boundari
.
he commission will meet Wednesday,
cello Council Chambers to reorganize,
budget, and review preliminary
proposal" which is the criteria
in accordance with Federal and
fundings. The last week in
ney for Hannon & O'Connor, his
eet with Federal and State personnel
d requirements.
recent telephone conversation with
c Utilities Commission, fourteen
d for the public hearings to begin
rings scheduled to take place in
on, telephone companies, and State
expected to run for three to six
ve someone set in on the hearing;
an intervention we must remain
may be done thru Dick DeLong,
atertown and Northfield were the
commission is still accepting
ity would need to file a request
idation process. The public
with start in May and run for
es well. Thereafter, the commission
o the administrative law judge
ntervention filing date was extended
icello filed their petition today
list. The communities of New
Branch have jointly hired an
at the hearings. Ms. Wells felt
hearings would probably set the
s of area metro service.
· f.
, .
1
.
~~ - I
. 1
.' '~'!'
.'........, .
.i...'~;~
~~.!.- ;
.'. ~
'- ,./"."
- - ...-..-- - ... ~
- ---- - - -
- -- - - .. .......
- -~- - ..... -.-...
- -- ...... - - --- ....... ,.
-- ... -_.
-...-. -- .... ...
- ....... ----.
- ... -
- ...-- -
- .- -
- ..- -
-- ..... -- August
-- ~- 1987
. there is no funding wit the program any
more.
What lies ahead fo Big Lake? "In a
community survey do e about two years
ago, about 80% said th y wanted to work
close to home," said ayor Bolin. "So
what we will continu trying to attract
will be small, clean lig t industrial com-
panies along with hea thy and growing
ma and pa operations" added King.
Availability of com ercial and indus-
trial land within the city could soon
become a problem and it is no secret that
the city has had disc ssions about an-
nexing portions of Bi Lake Township.
"The township is n t short-sighted,"
said King. "In the ne five to ten years
the two groups (city a d township) will
likely be working clo er and closer to-
gether," King continu d.
So what does it ta e for a smaller
community to be succ ssful at economic
development? Cooper tive city officials,
availability of land an utilities, an ag-
gressive marketing c mpaign, a local
development team tha is dedicated and
takes the time to m e things happen.
King summed it all p when he said,
"There are good time in Big Lake be-
cause we're making tb m good times."
Big Lake
. from page 1
Inc., a premium redemption firm; Rus-
sell'sOn The Lake,. a supper club;
Paulson Engineering; Dairy Queen; Big
Lake Grain Company; Big Lake Funeral
Home; and the mini-mall at the inter-
section of Highway 10 and Eagle Lake
Road.
There are also several new projects
currently in the works. An eight lane
bowling alley will be built soon with
expansion potential of an additional
eight lanes. A 28 unit motel is planned
for next to Russell's with a town house
development to be built next to the
motel. The Development Achievement
Center is being expanded.
Big Lake is somewhat unique in that
they have done what they have pretty
much on their own. Many cities have
gone the route of the state's Star Cities
Program which sets out a blueprint of
activities a city must accomplish in or.
der to gear up for economic develop-
ment. According to Bill King, the Star
Cities Program "is an excellent program,
but would be a duplication of effort for
Big Lake. It organizes community devel-
opment efforts to attract business, but
Urban planners have predicted that in
the not too far distant future the High.
way 10 corridor between the Twin Cities
and St. Cloud. will be fully developed.
When asked about what he sees as an
ideal size for Big Lake, Mayor Ron Bolin
replied, "I don't think we have a choice
in size. But we do want to encourage
planning and development for the future;
if we don't do it, someone will do it for
us."
What is Big Lake doing to attract
development? A revised long range com-
munity development plan is in progress.
A non' profit 501-C3 Development Cor-
poration has been formed. Its seven
member advisory board meets every
week in order to be able to provide timely
assistance to new business and industry.
The Development Corporation facilitates
low interest loans, land write downs,
utility extensions and "whatever it takes
to do a deal," according to former city
administrator Bill King.
For new businesses seeking to relocate
in Big Lake and who are requesting some
form of assistance the Development
Corporation undertakes a thorough
screening process to determine the
amount of risk and the likelihood of
succeeding. Questions they seek answers
to include: are the owners committed to
_ the company; are they bleeding it dry; do
they pay their bills-what is their credit
history; what are the working capital
needs; what trends are evident from their
financial statements. They also do an
evaluation of the financial statements
for the last three to five years.
Big Lake's plan of action seems to be
working. Over the past couple of years
several new businesses have located in
the city including: Fulfillment Systems,
CODtlDued OD page 4
;.:
,
c.......
'.
. '7~
-','j
.'::';,;J
Big Lake
For Devel
by Larry P.
Big Lake is defin tely not a sleepy little
community comp acently waiting for
their ship to come n. Nestled along the
shores of severalla es, Big Lake is about
midpoint between St. Cloud and the
Twin City metro rea. Its population
doubled during th decade of the 70's
from 1,100 in 197 to 2,210 in 1980. By
1986 the popula ion showed steady
growth to 2,750.
.
I
.
j
.j
-.
'\":
.
Conference review
Economic development
initiatives - cooperative
ventures consolidated
approaches
Not all cooperative economic devel-
opment arises from periods of crisis.
Cities of all sizes, anticipating develop-
ment problems, are joining with other
cities, counties, and townships to
organize cooperative economic devel.
opment ventures.
Adequate staff and committment
from business and the governments
involved are vital to the success of
cooperative economic development
ventures. City officials themselves
should get involved in fundraising, not
just require their staffs to do it. Pre-
senters also advised leveraging addi-
tional staff from business and
community organizations.
"Short-term, doable goals that can
get results to encourage continued par-
ticipation, along with consensus for a
common vision" are also necessary for
fledgling cooperative ventures, advised
Harry Rosefelt of the Department of
Trade and Economic Development
(formerly DEED).
The joint Little Falls/Morrison
County economic development com-
mission depends on an active commit-
tee structure within its IS-member
board of directors. Patricia Spence,
mayor of Little Falls and a boardmem-
ber of the commission, believes her
group's keys to success include the
fact that economic development is a
top priority in the city.
Cooperative ventures can't satisfy all
of the economic needs of all of the
participating members, and they'll
occasionally find themselves competing
for funding or projects, warned Paul
Vanderlinde, city administrator of
Grand Rapids and boardmember of the
Itasca Development Corporation. But
one benefit of the approach, he said, is
it provides a single clearinghouse for
ideas - "the buck doesn't get
passed. "
Vanderlinde also encouraged devel-
opment organizations to "take the cre-
ation of jobs one at a time" through
recruiting smaller businesses, even
22
:",~,.",:...,;,,'ltA:"".;.If,"':~'I~"'" .:u:"""'_,. '....I,....~_ft.....:... -",;' ...........- '""'*~
Economic development
though it may be m re tempting to get
larger numbers of eople hired at one
time.
Tom MuIIins, exe tive vice president
of Rochester Area conomic Develop-
ment, Inc., who ha also worked with
the Itasca Develop ent Corporation,
said he judges suces s by the number of
new jobs created, e growth in tax
base, and the net in number of firms
in the development ea. These criteria
are for newly create industriaI develop.
ment. According to uIIins, retail devel-
opment is not gro , but rather cutting
the existing pie into s er pieces.
-S.H.
Improving th rural
economy
"In spite of the fact that national
publications aren't focusing on the
problems of the rural economy as much
as they have in the st, we aren't out
of the woods yet," arned Tom Stin-
son, the new state economist and a
professor in the dep ent of agricul-
tural and applied e onomics at the
University of Minnes ta.
Stinson said th U . S. needs a
"national rural polic to improve the
long-term viability 0 the rural econ-
omy," because reso ce.based econ-
omies are in trou Ie all over the
country. Losses are ot equally distrib-
uted across the coun . The Midwest,
including Minnesota, is suffering the
greatest hardships. S ch a policy, said
Stinson, would need to include pro-
grams for long-term revitalization of
agriculture and preve tion of the seem-
ingly irreversible dec" e of communi-
ties in non-metropoli America.
Stinson described the "new rural
poor" emerging from the financial cri-
sis facing farm familie , and the ripple
effect it has for reside ts of small cities
due to the interdepen ence of the farm
and main street econo 'es. The migra-
tion of these new al poor means
major losses of human and financial
resources to the local economies that
they leave behind. The problem is
compounded when they move to large
cities, where they compete with the
urban poor for the use of costly social
services.
The federal response to these prob-
lems of rural city governments has
been to cut general revenue sharing
and increase mandates, such as new
regulations from the Enviromental Pro-
tection Agency. Stinson told the audi-
ence the "farm block" is no longer
powerful in Congress, and said there's
a real need for coalition building at the
federal level.
Jim Nichols, Minnesota Commis-
sioner of Agriculture, contributed his
view of the farm crisis as a full-time
farmer, and discussed the federal poli-
cies he believes are compounding the
problem. Between 15,000 and 20,000
Minnesota farmers have gone out of
business in the last several years, and
another 10,000 of the 103,000 farmers
in the state may lose their farms before
the farm economy improves, he said.
Nichols criticized the federal price sup-
port and PIK programs, saying they
aren't accomplishing their proposed
goals and that farmers don't want to be
dependent on governmental support.
Over 12 percent of Minnesota farmers
have more debt than assets, he noted,
and a full third have a 70 percent debt/
assest ratio.
"The American agricultural economy
doesn't have a production problem, it
has a distribution problem," Nichols
said. In Minnesota, this is compounded
by the underpricing of raw commodi-
ties. He supports the Harkin farm bilI
before Congress, which proposes to
return a fair and competitive balance to
farming and eliminate subsidies, to
allow farmers to earn competitive
incomes.
Overproduction for the available
market, government subsidies, and the
intervention of companies that profit
from storing surplus commodities com-
bine to make the farmers, main street
store owners, and taxpayers the los-
ers. "And, consumers don't win
either, " Nichols concluded. - S.H.
Minnesota Cities
~
I
I
.
.
Conference review
Economic development
tools-an update
City officials in this session were
guided through the labyrinth of federal
and state laws which enhance as well
as hinder the economic development
tools available to cities.
Gene Ranieri, a development spe-
cialist with the law firm of Holmes and
Graven, provided a historical perspec-
tive on development issues. Starting
with the 1937 Federal Housing Act, he
traced the evolution of federally backed
development programs and highlighted
the changing rationales for those
programs.
Ranieri began his discussion of Min-
nesota development programs with the
early port authorities created in the
1920s for the ports of Minneapolis, St.
Paul, and Duluth, and led up to the
present-day economic development
authorities and tax increment financing.
The 1987 Legislature took action with
the Rural Development Act that seems
to signal a trend toward emphasizing
state loans, rather than grants, for
funding development projects, Ranieri
said. He also described the powers and
expected activities of the Greater Min-
nesota Corporation and Regional
Development Boards.
Participants also learned about spe-
cifics of the Minnesota Economic
Development Authority (EDA) law
from Gary Currie, legislative analyst
for the House research department.
Currie identified the mounting pressure
in 1985 for special economic develop-
ment legislation as the impetus for
developing general legislation benefit-
ing a broader spectrum of cities.
Currie also explained the substantive
differences between port authorities
and economic development authorities.
Most important of them is~eater
authority rriven city councils in the
-actIvities of economic development
-authontIes. However, EJ2As must hOTd
elections to issue bonds. In contrast,
port authorities have no such election
requirement. Currie also outlined the
impact on cities of the ~arginal and
blighteum' restriction imposed on
EDA development districts. - L.F.H.
Economic development
What makes sense for
your city?
Gary Stout, a evelopment consult-
ant with Public-P vate Ventures, led a
discussion on ec nomic development
strategy. "I want you to learn how to
outline problems, not just react to
solutions," he sal . "This will be the
beginning of an eonomic development
strategy appropri te to your city." In
developing a str tegy, cities should
enumerate opport nities to be pursued
and problems to e' . ate. From these
ideas, you shoul write a single or
prioritized strate . "Keep it brief-a
page is almost to much, " cautioned
Stout.
He explained t t although it's diffi-
cult to come up 'th a single written
policy, it will help in the long run to
clarify disagreem nts and misunder-
standings, and to d velop a clear direc-
tion for your city. written strategy is
a tool to get other, eople involved. .
Stout conclude by saying cities
should not make development deals
just because they' e there, but should
proceed in a pa ticular direction
because it meets t e strategy the city
has set for itself. J.A.
Promoting s
buisness .
"Don't give UPI" was the advice
development-mind d city officials took
away from this sa sion. City officials
need patience, tena ity, and courage to
show small busines es that their com-
munity is seriou' about economic
development, acco . g to Gary Stout,
a consultant with ublic-Private Ven-
tures. Stout em asized the impor-
tance of e tab s . g a revo vmg fund
to assist sm us' esses, and mtro-
duce severa 0 1 la s whose cities
have been partie arly successful at
attracting businesse .
Robert Kessler, assistant to the
mayor of St. Paul d a small business
specialist, claimed city's economic
development direct r must be "part
planner, part vacuu cleaner salesman,
and part banker." e also underlined
August 1987
the importance of setting up revolving
funds and cooperating with local banks
to provide loans to small businesses.
Many cities confuse economic develop-
ment with real estate development, he
said, but there's a big distinction
between those two activities. Eco-
nomic development mainly involves
providing cheap, clean space and ser-
vices to small businesses.
John Galles, Sr., mayor of Windom
(population 4,166), explained how eco-
nomic development can succeed in a
small city. His city began by hiring an
economic development director and
creating a department with a $60,000
budget in 1985. Not everyone in the
community agreed with that move, he
said. The city was experiencing difficul-
ties, with many stores standing empty
and a plant closing eliminating 23 jobs.
But once businesses heard of the
city's commitment to economic devel-
opment, Galles said, many local firms
contacted the city about expanding.
The city worked with a Pamida store
that wanted to double its size, provid-
ing tax increment financing and assist-
ance in purchasing of the property,
local utilities, and other services. The
project posed difficult problems, but
Galles noted the economic develop-
ment director didn't give up, and the
store opened last November. "Expan-
sion begets expansion," he said, and
other local businesses have asked for
the city's help to expand.
Roseville is another city with an
active economic development program.
Craig Waldron, economic development
director, explained how development
began in one of the city's targeted
areas. Waldron's department worked
with a restaurant which wanted to
relocate in Roseville from a neighboring
city. The city paid to correct the soils
at the site, created a tax increment
district, bought the right of way, and
helped the restaurant buy the land.
The new restaurant then served as a
catalyst for further development in that
area. Waldron said it's important for a
city to "have a plan in place and a
strong idea of strategy, so that every-
one in the city is pulling in the same
direction." -E.L.
23
~."~~", ~;;~.~5jt~
.5~~:~""'-
~"...."" ~ "J' ["' I
":'u) :,' ,~,. ,'. n
.'.....,,'~~b, .
.
.
Montic 110
Industrial Development Committee
250 East Bra dway
Monticello, Minnesota 55362
Phone (612) 2 5-2711
July 23, 19 7
Dear Industrial Development
Upon Mr. Bob Rierson's invit
Development Committee is inv
Telephone Company Conference
of area extended services.
with coffee and rolls is sch
July 27, 1987 at 7:30AM.
It is of the opinion of Pres
myself that the IDC respond
to cooperate with the teleph
our efforts for area extende
Please RSVP to my office.
Sincerely,
~ \~~C~~
Ollie Koropchak
Industrial Development Commi tee
Executive Secretary
cc: File
ommittee Member:
tion the Industrial
ted to the Bridgewater
Room for an "update"
he meeting served
duled for Monday,
dent Kendall and
avorably and continue
ne company in
services.
smliRf
gg
. ,
fOR "
ICOIO.IC
C DEY!lD'.UT
1987 IDC Banque
.
.
1 Gene Walters
1 Gene Fair
2 Wright County State Bank
2 Loch Jewelers
1 Kjellberg's
2 Jones Cable TV
2 Gruys & Johnson
2 AME Ready Mix
2 Johnson Store
2 Peterson Const., Buffalo
2 Mattson Weg1etmeyer-Abendrath
Architects, Mp1s
1 Ron Hoglund
1 Monticello Office Product
2 OSM, Mp1s.
1 Shelly Johnson
1 Springsted, Inc. Mp1s.
2 Dahlheimer Distrib.
2 Coast to Coast
1 Monticello Floral
2 Dave Peterson's Ford
2 First National Bank
2 Mosford, Barthel
2 Maus Foods
1 Mark's Realty
1 Country Travel Store
1 Foster, Franzen, Carlson
2 Lincoln Properties, Mp1s.
2 Gould Brothers Chev.
2 Snyder Drug
.
1 George Philips
1 Dale Lungwitz
2 Henning & Assoc, Mp1s.
2 NSP
2 Monte Club
1 Floyd Mark1ing
2 First American Bank, St. Cloud
2 Joyners Lane
2 Ben Franklin
2 ADS (Direct Market Media)
2 Rainbow Enterprises
2 Winkelman Building Corporation, St. Cloud
2 Holmes & Graven, Mp1s.
2 TCF Banking, St. Cloud
2 Viet Construction, Loretta
2 National Bushing
2 Security Federal
1 Golden Valley Furniture
2 Larson Mfg.
2 Fulfillment Systems,Inc.
2 Monticello Times
1 Little Mountain Floral
1 James & Gruber
1 Smith, Pringle, Hayes
1 Ben Smith
2 Fab-con Inc. Chaska
4 Monticello-Big Lake Hospital District
2 Bridgewater Telephone Co.
1 Moon Motors