Loading...
EDA Minutes 05-13-2020 (Workshop Meeting)MINUTES WORKSHOP MEETING - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (EDA) Wednesday, May 13thβ€” 5:00 p.m. Academy Room, Monticello Community Center Due to recommendations related to the COVID-19 virus, the EDA meeting was conducted as a remote/virtual meeting. Commissioners Present: Steve Johnson, Bill Tapper, Jon Morphew, Tracy Hinz, 011ie Koropchak-White, Lloyd Hilgart, and Jim Davidson Staff Present: Angela Schumann and Jim Thares 1. Call to Order Steve Johnson called the workshop meeting of the EDA to order at 5:07 p.m. 2. Roll Call 3. Emergency Loan Program Review Jim Thares introduced the proposed Emergency Loan Program. He explained that staff had previously (April 6, 2020) sent out a letter to local Monticello businesses indicating different financial assistance programs through the State and Federal governments. Staff have been taking follow-up calls in response to the letter and the needs of the local businesses. Thares provided the draft guidelines for the potential EDA business assistance grant program and it was noted that it utilized the City of St. Louis Park's model. Thares explained that many cities are doing similar grant programs. Thares recommended using a portion of the funds available in the Greater Monticello Enterprise Fund (GMEF) to provide up to a forgivable $5,000 grant per business. It was noted that there is a lot of money available in federal programs, but that many businesses don't fit the changing criteria of these programs. Angela Schumann added that it would be proposed to allocate up to $100,000 from the GMEF program to this grant program. It was mentioned that any of the proposed guidelines could be revised per the EDA and that staff were looking for specific feedback. The EDA's Attorney helped to review the draft guidelines. It was noted that staff tried to streamline the information needed to be completed by the businesses and that many of the items should be readily available if they applied for programs such as EIDL or PPP. Schumann noted that the proposed program would ensure that the grant recipient use the funds within three months and there would be one reporting requirement. There would also be the note that if any City bill was delinquent, the EDA would have the discretion to approve the grant to pay back that bill first. Economic Development Authority Minutes (Workshop Meeting) β€” May 13th, 2020 Page 113 Discussion pursued between the EDA members and staff. In summary, the EDA was supportive of the grant opportunity, but due to uncertainty and changing guidelines of the state and federal government, they requested tabling action on the item until the next EDA meeting on May 27, 2020. City staff would also be discussing with the Chamber's membership committee to provide feedback on what they are seeing, feeling, and their needs. The EDA felt that $5,000 would not be enough to help a business that is on the brink of closing permanently remain open. It was also noted that the program could see more than 20 businesses requesting the maximum funding amount. There was also a concern with the administration costs of the City to implement the program. The EDA also discussed using the program for property tax or utility forgiveness or structuring the grant towards innovation and implementation of new business plans during and after COVID-19. Bill Tapper, Jim Davidson, 011ie Koropchak-White, and Tracy Hinz all participated on a small business roundtable discussion with local businesses to understand their needs during this time. They noted each business has unique needs. 4. Housing Study RFO/P Review Jim Thares introduced the housing study proposals and asked the EDA if they were still interested in moving forward in light of the COVID-19 effects on the economy. It was noted that the timeline to complete the Study is late August, 2020 so it can inform the Monti204O + Comprehensive Plan update. Thares noted that the EDA has $18,000 budgeted from the general fund for this project and that most bids came close to that number. Angela Schumann explained each EDA member was provided copies of the proposals and a scoring sheets to help rank each firm. She also asked whether the EDA felt it wise to proceed, if they liked the proposals, and if modifications to the scope needed to occur. The EDA members noted that since 2017, there have been a variety of housing projects constructed or in the works. The housing study could help guide the decision making process for more housing in the downtown. There was the concern with the time and if the data would be good due to implications due to the pandemic. It was noted that the timeline for completing the updated housing study may need to be revised. Due to the short amount of discussion time in the workshop, staff recommended tabling action to allow the EDA more time to properly review, rank, and discuss each proposal. The EDA's consensus was to hold off on taking action in selecting a firm until the next EDA meeting on May 27, 2020. Economic Development Authority Minutes (Workshop Meeting) β€” May 13th, 2020 Page 2 13 5. Adjournment The EDA adjourned the meeting at 6:00 p.m. Recorder: Jacob Thunander Approved: June 10th, 2020 Attest: JiTha es, Economic Development Director Economic Development Authority Minutes (Workshop Meeting) β€” May 13', 2020 Page 3 13