The URL can be used to link to this page

Planning Commission Agenda 11-06-2006 Staff: Jeff O'Neill, Angela Schumann, Gary Anderson, Ollie Koropchak, Kimberly Holien and Steve Grittman - NAC - AGENDA MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday, November 6th 2006 6:00 PM Commissioners: Rod Dragsten, Lloyd Hilgart, William Spartz, Sandy Suchy, and Barry Voight Council Members: Mayor Clint Herbst, Wayne Mayer, Tom Perrault, Glen Posusta, and Brian Stumpf 1. Call to order. 2. Approval of the minutes ofthe Planning Commission meetings of October 3rd, 2006. 3. Consideration of adding items to the agenda. fI 4. Citizen comments. 5. Consideration to review for discussion a draft framework for an amendment to the Monticello Zoning Ordinance for Planned Unit Developments. (JOINT WORKSHOP WITH MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL) 6. Adjourn. e . . . Planning Commission Minutes - 10/03/06 MINUTES MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, October 3rd, 2006 6:00 PM Commissioners: Rod Dragsten, Lloyd Hilgart, William Spartz, and Sandy Suchy Council Liaison: Mayor Clint Herbst, Tom Perrault Staff: Jeff O'Neill, Angela Schumann, Gary Anderson, Ollie Koropchak, Kimberly Holien and Steve Grittman - NAC 1. Call to order. Chairman Dragsten called the meeting to order and declared a quorum. 2. Approval of the minutes ofthe Planning Commission meetings of September 5th. 2006. MOTION BY COMMISIONER SPARTZ TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE SEPTEMBER 5th, 2006 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. MOTION SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER HILGART. MOTION CARRIED, 4-0. 3. Consideration of adding items to the agenda. None. 4. Citizen comments. None. 5. Planning Commission Candidate Interviews The Planning Commission held interviews with the following candidates: Roger O'Dell Barry Voigt Idella Ziegler MOTION BY COMMISSIONER HILGART TO RECOMMEND APPOINTMENT OF BARRY VOIGHT AND IDELLA ZIEGLER AS PLANNING COMMISSIONERS. MOTION SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER SUCHY. MOTION CARRIED 3-1, WITH CHAIRMAN DRAGSTEN IN DISSENT. I . . . Planning Commission Minutes - 10/03/06 Chairman Dragsten indicated that his dissenting vote was due to the Ms. Ziegler's indication that she would possibility serve only one term. 6. Public Hearing - Consideration of a request for Conditional Use Permit for Development Stage Planned Unit Development for a restaurant use in a B-3 (Highwav Business) District. Applicant: Brendsel Properties. Inc. Holien presented the staff report, reviewing the proposed site plan details, including parking, access and circulation. She indicated that cross easements in place created an acceptable parking and access situation for the site. Holien noted that staff would encourage the applicant to pursue an alternate site for the monument sign. The proposed sign location prohibits the applicant from extending the sidewalk from the front door to the west end ofthe parking lot. She recommended that the applicant shift the sign approximately three feet to the north, to allow for the extension of the proposed sidewalk. In regard to the presented landscaping plan, Holien noted that the plan had been presented with the original PUD plan. At this time, staff would recommend nothing additional, with the exception of two overstory trees within the two parking islands. Holien reported that staffrecommends approval, subject to conditions in Exhibit Z. Dragsten inquired why the Commission didn't get colored renderings of the building. Rick Brendsel, applicant, responded that he hadn't chosen colors yet. However, the building materials were illustrated on the building elevations. Hilgart asked about landscaping requirements in terms of overstory trees on this specific site. Holien stated that the whole site was most likely considered in meeting landscaping minimums, versus individual lots. Holien noted that the individual site doesn't have its share oflandscaping, as it is most likely spread over the entire development. Spartz asked about landscaping in relationship to moving the sign. Holien clarified that it as it is surrounded by plantings, those would need to be moved with the sign. Suchy noted that at peak evening times, the adjacent strip center uses a lot of this parking. Holien stated that the cross easements to the north and south should prevent a problem. Dragsten asked about grading and drainage plans. Holien answered that grading and drainage are not expected to deviate from the original plans. As such, the developer is expected to develop the site in accordance with those plans, which were sufficient and approved previously. Dragsten asked for confirmation that there are no drive up windows. Holien confirmed that there are not. Chairman Dragsten opened the public hearing. Rick Brendsel addressed the Commission as applicant and site developer. Brendsel stated that they have addressed the monument sign. The patio was laid out to follow 2 Planning Commission Minutes - 10/03/06 . setback line and then curve. He stated that instead, they will mirror image the north and south sides to angle. It will open the area and allow for movement of the sign, along with landscaping. Dragsten asked ifthey will have sidewalk. Brendesl stated that it will run the length of the building as requested. Brendsel stated that in terms of parking, the site is 11 or 12 spaces short, but there are actually 12 more spaces than required in the north on strip center, plus the cross easements. Dragsten asked about grading and drainage. Brendsel stated that utilities are already in, everything else will occur to plan. Brendsel stated that in regard to the tree recommendation, he would propose to plant one of the recommended overstory trees in boulevard, as a flag pole exists in one of the island areas. He will plant the other in the island as requested. Staff agreed. Hilgart asked Brendsel to describe the restaurant. Brendsel described it as a casual sit down restaurant with on-site bar, which was how it was originally proposed. Suchy asked if there was a preferred style of how traffic will exit. Brendsel reported that it is designed to have traffic came around the Super Express. Suchy asked how it will be signed. Brendsel stated that it is designed to circle traffic and allow access from both sides. Suchy confirmed that won't close off any area. . Dragsten asked ifthere will be outdoor seating with landscaping. Brendsel confirmed that there would be and that they would maintain the landscaping as shown on the plan. Dragsten asked if Brendsel is satisfied with Exhibit Z. Brendsel confirmed. Hearing no further comment, Chairman Dragsten closed the public hearing. MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SUCHY TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE RESTAURANT SITE AND BUILDING PLANS AS RELATED TO A REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR DEVELOPMENT STAGE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR A RESTAURANT USE IN A B-3 (HlGHW A Y BUSINESS) DISTRICT, BASED ON A FINDING THAT THE PROPOSED USE MEETS THE INTENT OF THE PUD AND IS CONSISTENT WITH THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DISTRICT, SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS OUTLINED IN EXHIBIT Z AS FOLLOWS: I. The monument sign shall be relocated to allow the proposed sidewalk to extend to the west end of the parking lot. 2. The landscape plan shall be revised to provide two additional overstory trees, one in the west area of the site, adjacent to the patio, and one in the island on the east end of the south row of parking stalls. . 3. The applicant shall submit colored elevations, including details on proposed materials for the trash enclosure. 3 Planning Commission Minutes - 10/03/06 . MOTION SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER SPARTZ. MOTION CARRIED, 4-0. 7. Continued Public Hearing - Consideration to review for discussion an amendment to the Monticello Zoning Ordinance. Chapters 6A (R-lA Single Familv Residential District) and 7A (Single Familv Residential District). Applicant: Citv of Monticello MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SPARTZ TO TABLE DISCUSSION REGARDING AN AMENDMENT TO THE MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE, CHAPTERS 6A (R-lA SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT) AND 7 A (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT). MOTION SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER HILGART. MOTION CARRIED, 4-0. 8. Continued Public Hearing - Consideration of a request to amend Chapter 3 of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance regulating the height and area of signs in a freewav overlav zone within commercial districts. Applicant: Monticello Planning Commission Holien summarized the staff report, indicating that based on the discussion held at the previous Planning Commission meeting, revisions had been made to the proposed overlay map. The revised map allowed the Commission to select which areas to incorporate into an expansion of the freeway overlay zone. . Holien noted that the red area shown on the map is the demarcation of the current 800' freeway overlay district. Herbst stated that on east side of the City, there may be potential for commercial development, which should be considered in determining the overlay. O'Neill stated that if parcels are within 800', they would still be eligible for the increase. However, only properties zoned commercial would be eligible for the increase. Suchy asked where the area noted as District 2 would stop. Staff indicated that Royal Tire would be the last building eligible. Dragsten inquired about heights allowed if the overlay were extended to any of the additional areas. Holien stated that she believed the height would be extended to 32'. O'Neill stated that they are currently allowed to 22'. Dragsten sought confirmation that all the Commissioners still agreed that to be eligible for the size bonus within the 800', the property must be zoned commercial. Dragsten asked what applies to the Mielke site as a PUD. O'Neill stated that whatever was approved via their PUD would be their allowance. . Spartz asked if the orange area would include the Best Western. Holien confirmed. Spartz asked how an amended overlay could impact the north side of interstate. O'Neill referenced that the downtown redevelopment plan would regulate much of the signage to the north of the interstate. 4 Planning Commission Minutes - 10/03/06 . Dragsten stated that if the overlay included all the noted districts, it would simplify the ordinance. Suchy agreed. O'Neill stated that consistency is important. O'Neill stated that his only concern is that the yellow area seems like it might be more consistent with signage needs on School Boulevard versus freeway exposure. Hilgart stated that he doesn't have a problem with the yellow districts labeled as "2" and "3", but he is concerned about the area labeled ")", as it abuts residential. Dragsten clarified that he would also favor yellow areas 2 and 3, not 1. Dragsten asked about extensions on the east side to include O'Ryan's. Holien stated that these zones were based on area rather than by districts. Herbst asked how you justify the orange and yellow here, but not there. Dragsten echoed concerns. Herbst stated that if the residential factor on I applies to the west, and then it should apply on the east end, as well. O'Neill noted that some areas there stayed PZM. Dragsten inquired ifthere was consensus on including areas 2, 3 and all ofthe orange area. Spartz asked if the ordinance could state that the freeway bonus district go to 1000', but not within 300' of residential. Holien stated that could be added. O'Neill stated that by going by property lines or roads rather than distance, we get properties that are more alike. . Dragsten asked how Hilgart felt about) 000'. Hilgart and Suchy agreed on street lines. Dragsten stated that 2 should go all the way to Dundas. He commented that streets are natural breaks, and that there should be some setback from residential area. MOTION BY COMMISSIONER DRAGSTEN TO AMEND THE SIGN ORDINANCE TO EXTEND THE FREEWAY BONUS DISTRICT TO INCLUDE ALL OF THE AREA LABELED AS ORANGE ON THE FREEWAY OVERLAY DISTRICT MAP, AND TO INCLUDE YELLOW AREAS 2 AND 3, WITH THE EXTENSION OF AREA 2 TO DUNDAS ROAD. MOTION SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER SUCHY. MOTION CARRIED, 4-0. 9. Consideration to review for discussion a draft framework for an amendment to the Monticello Zoning Ordinance for Planned Unit Developments. Holien reviewed the staff report, which summarized the analysis ofrecent residential planned unit developments based on a theoretical points system. Holien explained that the analysis was completed based on approved plans and site visits. She noted that none studied met the 75% point threshold set. Holien commented on specific categories of deficiencies. . Schumann discussed the possibility of a workshop to review the outcomes of the analysis in terms of values and in relationship to the weights assigned to categories. Hilgart 5 . 10. Planning Commission Minutes - 10/03/06 recommended including the Keyland neighborhood for further comparison. The Commissioners agreed to hold a workshop on this topic within 3-6 weeks. Consideration to reschedule the November meeting ofthe Planning Commission due to General Elections. The Commissioners came to a consensus on shifting the regular November meeting to November 6th. 11. Adiourn . . MOTION TO ADJOURN BY COMMISSIONER SPARTZ. MOTION SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER SUCHY. MOTION CARRIED, 4-0. 6 Planning Commission Agenda - 1116/06 . 5. Consideration to review for discussion a draft framework for an amendment to the Monticello Zoninl!: Ordinance for Planned Unit Developments. (NAC/JO/AS) REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND Previously, staff had compiled findings related to a preliminary points system evaluation for planned unit developments. Staff have prepared a powerpoint presentation that places the point system and the analysis in the context of a broader evaluation ofPUDs. This powerpoint introduction will be presented at the beginning of Monday's workshop. Following the introductory presentation, the format will be an open discussion of the topics introduced. SUPPORTING DATA For reference during Monday's meeting, the following are included as supporting data. . A. Comprehensive Plan Input Summaries B. 2005 Twin Cities Metro Area Opinion Survey C. Central Region Maps/Information 1. Population Change 2. New Subdivision Lots 3. Jobs Per 100 Households 4. Projected Population Growth 5. Integration of Collar Counties D. Open Space Design/Conservation Development Model E. Economic Value of Water Quality F. Lino Lakes PowerPoint - Environmental Design Process G. Pioneer Press Articles - Lino Lakes Development Council members have also received the following (Planning Commissioners had received these items previously): H. PUD Points System Analysis 1. Autumn Ridge 2. Carlisle Village 3. Hillside Farm 4. Spirit Hills 5. Sunset Ponds 6. Timber Ridge . . . . Table 4 What are Ihe eight (8J best lhings about living In the part of Montiulll;l north of 1-941 Abilitytocomm"te Fr........}'."." ^""...tor..taunnlOthtucommunitypath. Ho'pir:a1 Better park. Ho"!'ir:a1acc.,undclinic, Cammunityballparks Le"mnge,tion Community Center - Senior Center - walkingpatru. Medical bdlitie, Easierfreewayao:e.. ~ontissippiPark E'tabJi.h.dneigbborhooa.. MontissippiParkw:illcingpath"l"t= Whydo you llv. In Monti,.llo? (Sollth NelghborhoDd only) 1l2waybetweenwork-convenient FamilyTies Ability to work in your community Far enough ou'ofCities Busin...location Becauseofbusin...andTai,ingycungmildreninaFoundatownhomelliked nke.nllironment C""...allylocatedTwinCiti..&St.doud Comrnunityf<oling Diffrrentthing';toffe.. Enjoy.rnalllowncommunity Freeway",""'" Friend, & church Goad Fire D.,,-.nt GoodSmoolSy'lem Goaa Sheriff & Officen Why do you live In the Monticello area? (Township only) 1/2waybotw..nparent.andfamilie, Didlike the town (2) 15yeaTSagoitwa.quiot affordability,familyhistory,IHko.rnalltown. bornb"'e bombere borabere borabere and family here cho,etomoveoutofthocity Clo,eenoughtoworkinthecitie,orSt.C1oud do.etohome do,etoMetrolo'atlons clo.etoMpl,StCloud closetoworkbere enjoy country living family family history farmedfor50years fu"job brought me hete Ireewayacce.. Iri,nd'at.he'e good.cl>ool, Grew up here ha""n'tdeddcclwberetomove,uotmetro stili ,mall-onetoone Haven'tmov""yet Imov,dou,foropenspac.and.maJItownfeeI W....t..ethe best qu..litiesofyuurneighborhood1 (South Nelghborho odonl)') Ability to visit witb neighbor. Friendlyneighhors.tp.otk...... A,C<!S5 to trails Goodbo""iull Church.. in area Goodp.ople Oo.eto bogpital I.argetlotsi"e Clo.etnShoppingCenter' LiketheLibrary CommunitylNeighborhooda'mospher. Monti Hill-bestview Cul-de-sac NeotneS5ordeanlin... Fanntieldlnbacky.rcl Noighbo<hoodPa<kslll ocrea8" What.rethe best qualities of the a.e~ w~re you liveol (Township only) a",,". to 94 go1f<ourse(Silv<rSprings) good fann land agland beautiful.spa<e,I"'ll"<loto,fbhing Best ofbotbwodd. <a'Yao:<e"" to citi.. canFindwhatwbeneedhere-don'tneedtotrovel to,hop,hospital/m,di<alspecialtie, <entr.lbetweenMonticelloandAlbertv111e c1o,e to city. 194. tteed lo',nexttopond,la'll"" ~" c1o,etometrobut.tinru:raJ.malltownieeUng c1o,eto.chools c1o'e to town conveniencew.lin30minofbrg.rcili.. f.milycl",e Fantlland &pea<:e & quiet fired.portmen' good neighbor good neighbors ween.pace huntingandwildliie infrastru<tll"<ei,topnotm Ia<kofbigcitycrim.,p-r...ut. Ie.. re,triction,.nd ordinan<.. Lik.havingehoi,ebetweenSt.Cloud&cities, pTIUCimity torinT .mall town living; knowing my neighbon lo<a1ho'pital Lctsofpadc. Lcwtownsbiptaxes loweTp-ropertytaxeain,ownship Migsissippirinr Addpavedt<ailsandm'b><kw<<dsontrails Whatthingscl;luldb~dl;lnetllm..keyournelghborhoodbetler1 North Lackofyard maintenance and oldp.otked..rs Betrorlighlingonstr..ts Citywid. _ miuimum standatd home maintenance Enforc:enon-workingnhid.oTdina=e Enforc:.yordupkecp Fo1lcwsprinklinllrul.. Incre..edpolioecowtoge.outhof94 K...pt,..rfic Iree flowing Label"",.t. on both ,ides MontkelloComprehl!llsivePbnUpd.te Lean morettee'llotowa:rdsdevelop.d Less carp.orking (notin IlOe) on streets Loud<adioinG'rs Maintainthepa:rk-8&23 Slowdown traffic (enrorc:el) Streetimprovem.nt"UTbandgoner Street mainlenan<e-poor rep.oiT Toobigbofspeed(oa<s)througbtown Moreoraquietneigbborhood Nkepo.rk'onriver PinewoodScl>oolandplayground Quie,,,,... Rcasonablyquiet -, -, Good Value-Cost Grandp.arent,-ImowdheT.tobeby grandcl>i1men G<.w up in are. Hometown Hou&ingreason.blermts ',b """ LoGationb.tweenCitie,&S,.Clond Neighborhood Meetings (August 2006)-Group Discussiom River ao:oe,aJnic.r homes River view SeniOTcenter Sw.ns W.llcinlltrail. W..tside.ow.arenot.ffectedbyHighway25 Plateof<mploymrnt QoalityofLife Raj,.dH<", Rai,ing<bilmenoutsid.of~et:ro Rocreation Schools Servioesavailable Sl...ofcormnunity job""luiremetnUveinMontl Initial1yfOTone peTSonpdce of new house followed rural anno'ph<<e byfindingalo<aljob paying equivalent to Twin Citie. like local re,ident Uker:hecountryturalfeelOnewantedoutoi HennepinintoTeasonablypric:edhou.ing Like r:he town loeation-didn'tliketbedty-farmkid, Myiamilyi,here Nkepo.rks,lo'alionofriver.Felt<o",munity offe,..dmor.th.nothe" proximitytocities/St,C1ood relatives here ruldlorea ruralar"",'peTe tuldlatmo'pbere Neighboto Opensp.o"'" P",klTrai], Pathways Peao:.&Quiet Pl.as.koep'MonteC\ubHill" Proximity to s<hool. rural<hararter, I ean have hor...., th.re are many oth.rhoTSe, here .chooldistrict .dlool.ysteln s<hooIsy,rem .malltownatm<>sphere .pace.appreoi.1terurallif..tylebornandrai..d ",re .tillbao.malltownatmo'pher. wantedruT.lIiving wantedwideopen.p.oc", W.know everyonein Monti wit. fami!y from bere work Qui<:kacoe.. to 1-94 Quiet Scbools Sidewalka T..-in Park & Pond Vbualbeauty-wa'.,.(ponds) W.lkingandhikingpath. natural environmeut, river, ,<enio quaUtie., lak.., quiet,ruralqua~ty openspa<< Natun is my bome - pea<efu], Iivinllin country, dosetoTwinCitie..nditoactivitie.. ncigbboTSlneigbborhood(r..ponaible) Open space (3) open.pace, open.pace, outofdtylimits PelkanLaIr. be.uty PeliGanLalrebunting&fishlng pe"onalfre.dom(1ackofoverTogo!ation) pollc..fi""ho.pital.ambulan<e privacy pnva<:J' privacy, wildlife, wate.- quiet South Adclitionalwowtboihomes development <ontinu.towow-odvertise Betternoiserontrol(noiseabatement,.ign.)of tram, rural&ao:oe"toiamilie,land rural ieel,le.. conll".ted than olhe.. Scbools smalltownatmospbete "Pad"". .till rUTa1. HOO!lingoutof.ight. townsbipgov't tre., uaually.",alItown ieel web.velot'ofaoreage wildlife Wrigbt County (policeprot.ctionj MontiClubHiII-pre,erv.natu<al,open'pote Mo,e expensive horn.. in "communitie.- with amenilie. SUm a,horsettail., barns, walking trail, and pools Bertortrail,to/from,idewalk, More.tTeetUght, DOlldoo and harking out oi control Moretreesinpa:rk.~F"ewayFie]d,) Fini,b PaTkin Groveland Neighborhoodcoorte'ieo Fbrmainag. pond.makei.look nk..(Hillsid,,) NeighborhoodCrime Watm Getridofd.ndelion, Rt>adb.irri.ronbikep.otb, Higbetp.oyingjobs,inc1udinglightinduotry Sidewalks Improve Edmunson Road & Fallon Road T""",puttogooduse In<:ceaseplaygroundequipm.ent(RiverMillrark) Traffi,Congestion K.'ptb.bu,line-neee.saryfo<senio," Trail,wnneotingweaterMontice1Io b.. reli.nce onautomobiIe.- more seli-wnt.imd T......'! neighborhood, Ligbting(Stteet)onS<hoolBoolevard MonteC\ubHill YMCAproperry.houldbecorneacouotyp.ork Pagelof6 SA . . - . Table 4 As future growth OC1::urs, whal ql,lalltln and characterlstks shollld be it part ofnew nllighborhoodd CTowns"'p onlyl ,jdowAlh,palh,iarbikes,eHyparh/trailsnearby Prm:imjtytog<lodjob,/goodpay appropriatehouslng to illnoighborhoods 0' connecttheJ>a'k'withlrails,playgmandsfor youngchildren,nelghborh""dwat,hgroup .afetyf..tur~.nearparhand"hools.lighling? keepilcoun(ry quaUty patktrails lawdem;tyhous., fewer.ta<terhmne"fewermuttifornily incorporate apensp>.ce pa.,k, Thoysbould'taYinlhedty Quality co"strnction, Jand'GOping(trees, gnen .tuft),willdnglbh:yclep.aths Shouldn'thavetogetinyou'...randdrive20 minutes forg""-neighborhoodg., station,-not justaneror.bu.i......""eaforgettingloafof bre.d. Sidewalks Iarg.rlot, NeighborhoodMe~ingS(August2006)_Group[)j~CUSSiom no more tawnhame. .lillillawa,reagelats Less congestion I"'rksfwaikingpalh. Mare parking an street:! (parkingwhen It mows) park< Neighl>orhoodmorelikehous""ins,udofg~rage' greensp,,,,, Bettertr.nsportatiooplonniog "'aintain~ndownerright./choi'.. Hwy25hy-p~..ofthedty tr~ffk""ntrol lotsize-larg.rl/4~<remin. 'ityautgrawthu.ethe""i.tingdowntawnallthe ronhou.oe,fard"".lopment nomare.partm.nts les;mldesac'rnorethrustre.ts nomoresrorterhames moremove-uphausing le..cang..tion morparksandrocr.ationaargeballfirld,) street lighting parks'ndpathw~l" Rffreationopportnnities.TechClology(broadbandcomp1etionofgr..n,pac.priortofinal..le .ce...) List things tlm: you like about Downtown Montk.llo. North Cenrerhoul.vardoonBro.dw.y Centerm.d:i=withtre"~nd.hrub. Com""'nitrC.nter CorncntoneCafe Cm'tini,esuunnt Libr.ty Liquorsto,. POst Office Pa.tOfficelocatioos Resr.ur.ults Rhonda',Cafe sm.Utownlook stre.tlighting Unique ,hap, WeknowaIlaftheoldbusine.,owners lessholdingpands_dange,ous South Antique Shop in Downtown Appe...nce of Downtown (light posts S..wnings) Attr.ctlvestreet..esp.Bro.dway Centermedi....flower.,tr... Community Center Cornmunit)'Center_agoodhub ComnlUnit)'Center/StripMall Cto,tini',_t..ringdown old-buUdingn.w Crootini',basbeen.u,cessfulo"wntown EIW.B:ridgeP.rkindo,epro:<imity Eas.ofpadting(lsckotbusiness) F.ctthatlilrra",.ndo:ommunitycent.'"eclose .^_.~^- ~ri.ndly,p'''onable Ustthlngs tht should be don~ to Improvl Downtown Monticello/make a better place to mop. North South TOWnship Addf.tnl.r'smarket.re. Afford.bl."ntand""incenliVe,ta.man,uniqueAIle'Wdowntowncon,ept bu.in.".. Addfe.dertout"" AdditionalMCPre,trictionsneedtob...mov<>;] Better.<<.., to I'ost Office Betterlo<.alparking Bringback.mall town local ,rore, Cleannptr..hfrom.partmento FilIvar.ntbuildingsf,"cr Improve traffic flow Incr....'..taur.ols L.okof,upportfrom'ityst.fftoh.lpdo,,'tIrown Parking Parki!l8onBro.dwayisveryh<ld .'erydangerous ProYidep.a.rking Replace empry l"t. Stoplightson25and75 volum.oft..ffi< Timingoflightsi,aprobl.m T..ffkimptov.ments Tt.mtsp..d.l.tkofpoliceenfom,ment Turnoldmovi.the.terintocOltlmunityth.."" U..v.cantbnilding.formndo. Ulilitywirepntundergronnd MonlkelloComprehe","'ePlanUpdate justgetridofdowntowoanduseth.".ato enh<lnceth.rivet.Abo.rdw.Ika:re.,etc Ni,he,ro,.." lack of parking Older horn.. ,houldb.com. 'IDallbusines... 1.",..tricliononTIFmoney Parking.Nonc L...tr.m"rnakebypas, Parking - one w.nts mare - 3 Want 1... - other _ just Lowe'. instead of Horn. D.pot right Remove"Chntch"lookingbnilding Rep..tbuoin..se.sdowntown_ar...ontakeep comingdowntawn(hai<<utploces,s.nd..hop" ga,.clotbing) similatto Sti1lw.ter Anotherri~er"o,.ing...torwestofMontic.Uo Anythingtoconve,ttoaninterestinghot.11 Bakery &fuh stor. Build on no.talgic are. ,hops Clothing 'tare,-boutiqu. type CondominiuJIl.Jlinsteadof.hop,_residential.... comme"ialor ,hops below/condo..bove Congest.dtraffi'-need..improvernentonth. major mods Dealwithis,neotparking Oo.omethingwithemptybuildings E.t.bli.htheriv..frontwithr~.tauTIlnts.dinner tb..ter,biJ.:e trail to St. Cloud,trollcy F~"liftDowntawn-redevclopm.ntbypriv.te investors W..ideaofDowntownbutnotu..h1e Makedowntown.funweekendd.stin>.tionfor p.oplef,Oltlthecity MoreDowntownbu,in.,se. Mor.p.,king Mor.'mallbu'in......op.nl.ter J,lov.,unnyfre,hro.nothcrarearo.ncaurag. themtogrowinM011l:ic.l1o N..dsb.tterp.a.tking Swanmerchandi,.for.ale Tornalreoldtheatreintocommnnity th..tre/pl.yhouse Tr.ffic'011g.,tion 1'T.ffi<onHwy25 Weekendd.stination ri.intoRiver? ;sa:...ibility'mor.parlring .fordablest.h'!l8 All th.trafficgoing to Broadww.y 125_ detriment.l bettera<ees. through rown (too ,low during evening'&weelrend, betterp.rking betterpa,king bettertr.ffi,flow dt)'give in<:entivesto downtown bu,jne"., rob. ili" clothing 'tore D-9C.t downtawnisd.adint.nn.oh.rnl,spl"U<ingup .nforcesp..dJimit fillnpthe.mpty'rote"a.ddmorephroailowarld'l """.. to be open hOltl.towngro,,",r imp'ov.parlting improv. traffic congestion Incentiv,", ",shapdowntown rnake downtown residontiil malreMontiaplac.tocametooIPors.hopplng moteloca1owners Moreprofession.loffices mor.qn.Utj.-.tote. No 'shop,--...'ique'~ren'tshopping_ parking parkingbette< R7Ahausinglarge lot, largehouo. gr-nwn frorn within maintain am'munity armosphere RWerf.st,communityOutrogether nonswn.ighborhaod. greenspaceandpark,maintainedwerJand. preserved .tttacrnswbnaine" la:rgerlolS ups,al.housing notmorelowinoomehonsing Lib<ary l.ookofhowDowntownupd.ted Nostalgic....form.-w.lkingi,anic.ch.ng. Poorp.rking River River-&riverpark, S1.ddinghill Smallhnoin....resp.ci.ltytyp.bu'in..... Small town loo1c Still pot.nti.ltob.tter downtown Uniqu"stor...,..'taur.nts W.lnut5treetliesOown"'wntog.,her Page30fS . . . Tabl..4 Neighborhood Meeting\ (August 2006)-Group Discussions What n~tllral features of the .orderly annexation lI.e" need to be prenrved or protected from future development? (Township only) .U Monti Club Hill Pr..ervo the ,mall town atmosphere bypreventing wetland. high density housingandmog..tore, from coming <.mcelann"".tianagr'ffilent-g;vobackto township Developonmarginall.andyland KeepMonteClubhillmaybea,apatk landawne...bleto ,boose what to do with theiT ownpl"(lperty Loraud.re.. lettobewild Maint.ainhvnting in Pell(an Lako;md rivers MontlClubHill Flndyourfavorltepllrk. North CityB;illfieldo Country dub Manor Ellison hrk (8) Mjo;js,jppi Drive Park Montissil'P;Pork(2) Pion~.rPuk(2) Whalpilrklmprovementsareneededl North Continuea'phalttrail._.longRRtra(\o; Cuttrallweed.-RiverHiThl Drinking".,"er~tMontiosippi Keeptrail,clea,."dinwinlorforwalking Polic.entorcemffit-drugde.linginp.rk. Safelyoonneatrai13aroundn.wbo><otor..ond high.",oo!baUpark. V.rywellkept MontlcelloComprehen'i~ePlanUpd.'e Monti Club Hillrn Myfann!!' Pelic.nLake P.:!ic.anLak..... '" preserve w.clandore.u ('lMCA prop.) PreserveYMCA<ampasi.. ProtectlDon'td.velopYMCAarea River mountain sconic Pr...."..lligW""ds (mature ,re..) .hor.land. Pr..."". Monti C!ub Hill as i,orred"".lol"'dinto SilvcrSpringsGolfCour"" community/publicspac.i",park.t<:. p""'.rv.Pelio:.onL.ke .i..nflot. P"",.rvep.licanLa!reWa,ershed w.tlandaquil'er South CountryClubM.nor Ea.t Bridge P.rk Ellison Park (I2) premo-.y Fi.ld. Pork Mudow Oak. P.rk (4) Monti<ollo City B.llfield. Monti,.;ppiCounty P..k (5) PinneerPa,k(S) South 4thSt=tPark cleanup Acces.ibilitytoallofth.m Addition.lthings for "'"". at park Bettermain'enanceonallparks-mowing. cleaning..re Cnntinu. trail along t-94 toe.., Monte Club Hill as prim. parklandll (Differ:ing opininn.) E'urthordevelnpm.ntnfPinnoe,P.rk Groveland-parlcinglnl.ndb-ballcourt. Mont.C!ubHill-.houldh.veahUltoppark Mont.ClubHillisvery.pecial_!lhuuldnotb. totallyprivat..,omepubli[u..wouldbe appreciated MontiClubHillPark..spbalt&parlUng_add gr." & woodcbip trails MnntiHiIl-parking-acc.".gaz.bo tra,beaN Mor.improvementsinPion..rPark Mo..tr....tenni.murt.&.occerlballfield. Northside!RiverMillPark-mnrepaIM..\edding hill,totp.rk Otherpark-moreequipm.nt Planning. cnmbine de""loptogcthet Pun:h.,.YMCArorpark Reginnal.lifget R..tfonm.andpi<:nkt!lhl.. ShelterarGrnwland Similar.meniti..toEl\i!lOnPark play structure Spnnscrr.dParh(i...BoyScout.) "Adopt-..pa'k" Strucrure:; on M..dowPark Tennis<<>urtsandb..k.thallcourt, W.lkp.thon F<nningAv.. Township East Bridg. (2) Ellisnn(l1) M""",owOaks Mi..iuippiDriv. Monte Club Hill Monti..ippi(lS) Pion.... (2) PralrieW..t We.tBtidge YMCA (2) Town.hlp AlVlrail, connect all trails oonn.clingtr.iltoYMCA oontinu.tnexpandtrail"l"tem cnntinuou. trail th.-oughout don't u"" them nowliv. rural .xp.ndparks.ndtrail.toth..outbandwost Ertension of bike paths towards 25..nYMCA garbagecan.onwaikw.y..ndintheparks H..e on. big park and maintain tbe trails w. alre.dyhave keepbiker,w.lke..trofficoffth.,.".d(fenning) ,houlderit keep.ome 'l'o of pifks duringfutw:e growth malntain,Jri'tingsnowmobil.trail,ancirightoi way. moketrailmap.s.vailabl. Mor. blcyrle mils mnre picnic labl.. Mor. thing. add.d needmoreba'ebaUand.occerfiekl,butNOTin YMCAa..,a Onepe..nnleltstronglyw.haveenougbtrails.nd ,omeoneh..topayrorth,m Parkgrowtb!lhouldkeepp"ewithn.ighborho<>d growth Pinn..rParkmoreequipm.ntn.eded Pr..m-eYMCA,ttailalongriwr,tr,ilalongCtj< Road J9 Ea.. prot<ttnar"'.I....a.andwildlif.......near Manitou publk.beach Restri<lallp.tk.to non morori..dv.bicl..0' walking rivera<c....takeadvant.g.nfnurb..utifulriver (itsthe..,butignored) oidewals and.boulder. on Fenning to 85th wadingpoo1ju.stoomttlunity<enter waterarea.rbea<h/nutdoorpool W.t.rTowerPa,kdevelop.d YMCAlandacquioition YJ.1CA ~~ YMCA aU! YMCA m.keitintnapark YMCA land YMCA park YMCApt......ation Y:MCAptopetty Page4of8 . . . Table 4 Whal are the three (])wofStlocatlonsfortrafflcsafety? Nanh South B,oadwa~atF<nningAv.nu. Broadway at W. RiverStr<'" Broadway!CR7S.",,'ofl.g4 Elm S'rffl at 6th StfE'ot FenningAVEnue,outhofSchoo]BOOJlev..d STH25at6thStr..t STH25at7thStr..t 5TH 25at Broadw.y STH 2Sal Broadw.y STH25alCRll STH2Sat,outhl.94interrhange STH2SatW.RiverStr... PenningAveandScMolBoulevaTd PenningAv..outhofMonteClubHill Penning Avenue at School Boulev:ud Re,idenlialnoighbmhoodstr..',outhofFcoeway Fieldsl>ark STH25at7thStreet 5TH 25 at 7th Street STH25atBroadway STH2SatBT<'adway STH25.,Oro.od.w.y STH25.tC,,",1... STH2SatChel...Ro.d STH25 atChel...Boad STH 25 at CheL... Rc.d STH 25.t..ritfromwestbound t-94 STH25.tnvor What are the three (3)worstlocatlonsformfflccongestion? North South Broadwi.yfCR7Sea'tofl-94 S<.hcolBoul.v.rdatFalconAvenu~andHigh S<MolP.rkingLot SmoolBoulenrdoneither.ideofSTH25 STH 25 at 7th S",.et STH 25 at Bro.dway STH25>tBro.dway STH 25.t Bro.dway STH 25.t Broadway STH25.tCh.J.eaRoad STH25.tCRll STH25.t.oothl-94intermange STH 25.t.outh 1-94 intermange STIl 25.t 'onlh 1.94 intermange STII25.outhofSchoolBoukvard STH2Sat4thStre.tE STH2Sat7thStr..t STH 25 at Broadway 5TH 2S atBToadw.y STH25.tBToadw.-y STH 15 alCh.I... Road STH2SalCh.1s..Road STH25atexitfromwe.tboundl-94 STH25at~lfmlnw.,tboundI-94 STH25 alTiveT STH 25'1 S,hool Boul.nrd STH25onNE.id.ofrive>: What.rllth.. thru (3) but fCKlltion5 for future residential growth? (Township only) Downtown NWof5TH251CRll EaotofCit)'INorthofl.94(2) NWpartofOAA NW In OAA ea,t of Cam.ron OAA along CR 39 NWofCR39/Cameron(6) SEofCR39/Cameron Busin.", EastbridgeofI-94 [-fl4/STH 25.outh sid. School Boulevard...t ofFaI1on School Boulev""d e..t ofFaI1on Sthool Bou1evacd...t of Fallon SchoolBou1evaTdw."ofSTH25 STH 25/71h Streel STH25!6thStreet STH25/7thS"'eel STH25/7th5"'eet 5TH 25!7th5treet STH251Btoadway STH25/Broadway STIJ25!Ch.1seaRoad STH 25/CR 106 Business BroadwayeastofSTH25 S<hool:Bonlevarde.st of Fallon STH25atTailcro",ing STH25rive>:bridg. STH25riverbridg. STH2S16thSlreet STH2516thStreet STH2S/7thStl'CCt STH 2S/7th Street STH2S/Bro.dway 5TH 25IBro.dw.y STH25ICh.Js..Road 5TH 25/Chel,e. Road STI125/Ch.1s..Road STH 25/1-fl4north ,ide STH25/1.94.oulh.id. STH25/5moolBou1ev.td SEofOAA(8OthStr..tlGiffort} SEoutsid.ofOAA SE STIl 25!85th Street Llstthe facton that make these areas desirable for future usldentlill development [TDwnshlp only) n&4tobuildtowatd.metroareaandnearnew do..toah..dyd....lopedar.. goodroad.37&18 inletmang. acc..tomajorcoads,serv;c.,.odinttastrnctuc. do.. to me"'o acc...to road..nd..",ice. aCC'"to ,mool add fur Ditm 33 improvem.nts adj.<enl orin cit)' along 25 i,logica1 areas U& 2 toflllin near<it)' 00.0 to nalural featur.. Heritage/Jeffe",on.cces,tofreewaywouldbe ne.d.d mwngdt)',ervic., more p,"ctical do..to.moolsandbu.ine.....ndintr..tnlClun naturallinkw/albertvill. n.are:<i.tingd"".lop",ents North.id.ofYMCA,.".b~shed owner. arewilling to develop the golf[ourse mmm.ri<:ialand industrial sh<>u1dhewe.t [ompattedgrowth t:v.rrentlyuniund.rdeveloped Good..c... Are there places In Monticello where you do not feel safe1 North SoUlh Allrailroadtraclc,byH.wks!O'Ry.". Around Kjellberg',ParkAre. BackpackingIot.tJal.Peno', BurgerKingar...parlm.ntll Cros'ingHighw.y25 Mi..is.ippi Div.. drugbuslO,.tt. Downbyth.river Nooethatwe.reawar.of Empty 1015 on Broadwayal evening parkinglotbehindJP" Mobil. home p.rk.< Smool Boulevard 1'0 Cheb.. before & after 'mool N.a.Kjellbergtr.rilerpark TattooParloT-kid.hangingoulsidealllhetime. Vandah.<mlobusin.....atnight Undeme.tbbridgeb.tw..ntheBridgeP.rks WalJcingoff the beaten p.th.. uiltoad l..cko Walkway "'to'" ftom O'Ryam (no lighting) Mon~<.IIoComprehen,iv.PlanUpda1. Page S ola Neighborhood Meetings IAugusI2006)-Group Discu>slolls Town.hip 4thStreet/Walnut o 39/CametonSrr..t FenninglnorthofBSthStreet SmoolBlvd at High Smoo1 (3) Smool!!1vdlCR1l7 5moolBlvdIF.llon STH 25 arrr:idor (3) STH2S/4thSl,..,.t(2) STH2Sl7thSt,..,et STH 2S/Broadway (4) STH2S/Chel.e. STH25/CR1OO(9) STH2S/RiverStre.t STH2S/SmoolBlvd Township BroadwaylFenning 1-94 ioterchange (2) STH25<orrid<rr(2; STH 25 north riverbridg. (2) STH 25/4tb Street (2) STH25/7tbStre.c(4) STH25/BTOadway(4) STH2S/Chel...(4; STH2S/Ch.l.e..Schoo1(2) STH2S/CRlOO STIl25/011 STIl25/SeboolBlvd STH2S/.outbd"",bridge SWwithioCityhmits(S) W."of84tbStr.elIGiffort W."ofH.rdingAvenue Sandolgr.""l.open.pace.;contigiousto.>i.ting d....lopmenbl .om. nice amenilieo _ will bringnker born.. '''yo.otasthi.h.p.tbedailycOrrtmuto,,,,affiu from h.vinlltO",averseth.ctry T.m"bl.fo,uop. toth...slland....ailabiUry Trees closo to rnajorToad,cle.n up dead trees wlindtyboundari...lready Monlicello Comprehensive Plan Update Page60fB Table 4 Neighborhood Meetings lAugusl2006) - Group Dis(ussions . Whlltllreyourbiggnlconc"mslIboutlht!futureofMonllcellol North SOlJlh Business Bridge.long3S'ocrc"", Big Lake Arreos'cqualitym.d.icalrare dty.dmini'ltatcrwithexpericnc. Cityw:ilIfcrgetolderareasineagernes.fornew AddinglightlnduotrialalongHwy2S(southof community,ervice. developmen' town) will ,upport th. existing busines,...nd th. Mme. SE ofdowntown Commuter bus system from hererodtie, Commuting..,lutionto Minneapoli, Donotletitdeteriorate After all. i,l, natthe moot "scenic" end oftown. Competition with othermunidpalitles Areais"sw:king"busin..s.wayfmmdowntown condi'ion of the river Con""tve Monticello Townshlpforfarrnlng & mntinuation of"bedroom mmmunity" atmo"l'here wetland, Could there be controll.d acaoostO Hwy 25 controlt""., Downtownredevelopmentwithagoodpa<lring '"0 LccaJpubli<lnn,port.tion Couldwe "sell" the rivermore-tie Into ae.tingtblngsforkid,todo shoppingldininglontertainment..poeclof Downtown (',milarroStillwat.r) Lo..ofpropertyownenrightsthranghu""of ".min.ntdomain" Crime deterior.tian of downtown M"nta'nd"".lopm.nlintegrltyfornortbe."end D.nsityofh"".ing ofMontkel1o Old downtown will die D.v.lopment.longN7S.newinlerchange? en<ou'ag.curtontbusin....s'ohir.lccally Old parI would become a low inG<lm. .r.. prone to D...,.lopment <ontinues in. relative qnick m.nner. Growth of. dty with an Identity crIme-d.ferredmaintenaru:e P3YkingwiUbeworse Toommhdevelopmentwi,bou'traffi< con,ldention, di..ppe.ringofourdowntown E..t\1owEI.m.ntatyopening EkmentatyschooisCs<hooising.n.tal) Grcwthofindustrial ino:reasod,rime Traftkflow E'earthatllwllllooklike."o:>okiecutt.r".uburb maintaingcod..naecfcomltlutUty Pi.. protection f.om downtown 'tation Montic<illc d<>esn't re",gni~e its own po'ential and wethinktoosmall Pire,emce MonticeUomayha-veabiggerdrugprobkmthant w....wilIlngIO.dmit(jntb."hool.) Pix ro.doongestion NSJ>willdo,e-woulilcarne.lotofjobio", Futur.usages1eading,o.mor.,.If.wntain.dore.parkingldowntown Cthu,lessneedtollilethealre.dyconge..ed juncticnofHwy25/S4) Gr<>w,hofjobs"no'.noughprof.,oional-lilre poli.:elfire'tati<ln Bo,ronSdentifk Growdv'I)evelopwhottbeyhave Highw.y*2Sdeveioprnent-,."h.tioallyand Pro bllliinessattitwle-aIIrommunity boards publi,safetylaime-potentiallylookatownpoli" dept. restrlt"vepolicyofcity:tOningandstruoture ,obools _ main..'n program' that will attra<:t -""" otatu;ofXcel SIllJpport.ohOCllsystem tr.ftk tr.ftk-,owedon'ttumintoaSt.CIond ...ftklrongestion who will b. be whenwegrowup? Infrastructure Lowinrom.bou,ing.t..tu....tion More 4-w.i.y.tops th.nstoplight, :More parks-Mon'e Club Park Morerourulabontatm.jorro.dintersections Paint on onr.ide of town . Pa:rkdeveiopment-YMCApropetty Peopleneedagoodreosontodrivethisf.rfrom M.ro Toom.ny,topligh'" Xcel Energytuworkwith ,urrentindn'tryto..ve ~" Tr.ffit Trafficinaeasewnge<tion Traffic tong""tion"S",ide. Biginaeaseintraffi< dnetonewretail Traffictount'3S(w)on'ofdty Ttafflo'ncre.se TTaffi,on25 Uncon,rou"dg"'wth Wh.~'go'ng'ohapp=toe:<i,tinghousing' . . . . hble4 How would )Iou u'" $10,000,000 to milk. improvement In Monticello? North South Beoutify the area with flora Buildpod..trianb,idgeloconne<IHilkrut Additi=towalkingpath Cityd."..lopmentofare.b.hindhoopitalfur .pecialtydinics Develop MontiClub Hillinto Montkellolandmarl< Mote Downtownbllilin..ses Development of new bllilin... in 0]6: downtown Mass "....,ttl,.U read within Montkello and MonticeUoTown.hip Hire mor. county police to ..rut in the llu:rease in ~ib.r optit lines fOT TV /Communicationo cr;meinMonli,.Uo Impro-o.fiberoptic.andwirel... Bu,;n." T.xfr..mon"l'formoreindlliltrtalbusin....' ac<."lolightraiV.hutlle Help Downtown bu.in.".. update to.ttr.ct more Ad"erti,e, Gateway to Twin Citie, -promo1. mOlo",,",' Monticello Develop from inner dty and work out onather bridge west of downtown YMCA park anotherint.-rchangebyOtchardRoad alttattcommun;tytollagegetanewdtystaff Buildanoutdoorheatedwaterparl</spawith energyfromn"d"~plant.anattractionfotthc city! Bulld""edowntownandmaketheriveraforal point bypas,reXXXXXtraffic Downtown red,velopment incentiv", (,_dout- uniqu.) Maintainqualityofwatet Rlverenvironment Make 1... re,triction on inveoling in old oowntawn New river cro..ing ~walkingpathalongMontidubHi1l Lightrail/mmmutingdeveloped Mo~. FillunAvenue bridge to Highland Way Monti Hill Open Bastview s<:bool Groundwaterquality Paint the <WaIl. or 'ower Dve'l'.....Fallon PoIic.departm.nt Buy YMCA! lru:r....forpoliL. Power lines underground Pron>ot.Montic.Uotoincrea'.populatlonof f.mllies Reduce m't of governmen'to .Uowmor. .<on<>nricgtcwthand 'mployment !lfmovalofoldbuildingondredevelopm.nt parking on Highway 75 Sam', Club. FleetFann. Red Robin; incr..se bu,ines. Subsidi..,..developm.ntproject5 Buyoldth..ter& make i'an art5 Center B-l.oneforn.lghborhoodbu'in..,., MonticelloTriathlon R.cr..tional u,. of the River Sum"",rSwespearefestival Parker M[Don.ilil monum.nt atp"rk on Monti C1ubHiU Newdowntownbuilding,!! [aIlMapl.Grovew..ehowthoy'redoingit Center of Commerce rommerciallr..identialdowntown Fiber optic infrastructure fiberoprks PiberOptks Fire protection Highland Way interdl.ngebridge vo. Fallon Improve Transportation ke€pochoolxtr.cun:kul.rptogr.m..Goodthings fotkids to do. Notjust.thleli[S-arts etc. M.;nu;n pork,;. upgrado tor all age.s Newintercru.Ilj!eonHW)l'39-e>:itonW94to39 andentrance.....thound r.d....lopmentlnolddowntown P.g~7of8 Neighborhood Meetjngs(August2006)-GroupDiscussions Township addn1.FiTeStlltiononoouth.lde along the river-""..s forreotaurant. along river anoverpatlstoconnectChelseato7thStwil:hlorn acces,onlynot94 anoth..fire'tatlon,outhof94 bettor public tran'portation buildanoth.Tbrtdg.overriverbypa.. Buyuplandbyth.atreandbuildanicecityoenter Buy YMCA BuyYMCAlandanil turning it into a public park camp.lte. in YMCA create more green space in town downtown Monti encourage manufacturing development Enhance the RiverA..a(W.dd.ingo orp.rty) find.way to tie itallrogother with 'ome planning don. for tran:;port.tlon fotourcommun;ty fu<p.llonAve fu<thero.w. heolth""rvicelixparulioncanJp"sandaltheiltler dbtrict(welst.ad) Hireaqualifieddtyadmlnistrator ifltwouldbuyabridg..movethecommu'ingn traffic ""tof downtown improwdown'own ,....openth.}olont;C1ub!Nohousing!CbinYuen. waterparL.destinationpla,e Pilrparkinglo..-includingthoseownedby.to""'ll rev:tvedowntown L""dmarkMonteduhHiU schools continued as.istanre improvetr.fficcontrol Improve traffi<: flow thru town Lowintereotloa.ns for comm..cial redevelopmentldowntown:redevelop Mov.theF.illonAvebridgetoHighl.ndW.y PurdlaseYMCApark!! Develop riverfront to m.ke Monticello a d."ination Flanttreeo' Buildrharm Pedestri.nfriendl)' 94COTridori.am.ajorplus ..=.1-94cm..r~sforH....ylOand2S Whatfatton make Monticello a good plaeeto operal~ a retail businnll (BuIlnn. only) demographics fre.w"l'tramc affiuentdemographialinWrightCounty Chamber of Commerce commerci.ll..se'pace.vaiL&afford>hle conlinuedre,identialgrowth aitical",...s.enoughpeopleto,usrainbusi...... h....PopuJ...tiongrowth '''''tomers<lVi,o/base =tomors are GREAT! Mo"tic~lIoCompreheJlSlvePI."Upd.t~ fururegrowth gas pnc",.r.couTOgelocolmarketing goodporking goodquaUtyemploy<.ba.o .-> hlgbmmc homegrown.youthfulIahOTpool Improve the riverfront Stree,lighting-lighting7thst""'" fmmO'Ry""s Townsquare/gatewaytotheriver shultlebu.selVicetoBigLake.ndr\<!igbboring Improvewaystogetac",..towu communlti.. Hwy 75 aeros' ineroa.. public safetycollar more poUce time! Use to drawindustriol husineso indu'triallcommerciald."elopment(RogeTSgotit right) keepthelittl.c:ityhu' utilizetherive< M.keiteasierforpede<triaru;tocro,.Hwy25. YouthTeenag.pmgram. .ddedadd'lp,ogram. M.keJeffYoungthernayor (Old The.tr.) locatjon locotion locotion rnorenelghborood?arks [lloreoffsaIeU,enso. n>oretrails (bike.ndwalking) connecting neighborhoods Paydown debt tolower_e. hes.rveYMCAunits.ntirety Propertytoxrelief Rebw1dandrmtalize downtown buidings redevelop downtown Monti Reimbur""to",,,.hiplor_eslostby.nnexation revit.lise.ndren",.atedowntownbybuilding.nd drawing the downtown are. to th.rtver .,.nourownpolicedept. stopligh,!l106 street lighting at he.vy inteTSeclions streetlightlngfoT,.curity Synchroni.e.toplightson2S U,ethemoneyto.ddresstkbig""deficitofthe '0" "'" YMCAp:ojert lowerrental..te, newinterdlang€.uptr.fficflowandtruck/freight traffl, peopl.wantto.hoplocally location peTSontopeTSon,ervj,e location 194 population growth locationlproxirnity to 194 retllilspaoeislower$thaninthecitie. lot' of .ctiviti". hockey. school. etc. to draw more strong Chamberl custome'" lo.....unemploymen' widestteets . . . Table 4 Wht aretliecliallengesforoperatlng a retail business In Monticelllll [BIl .lnll5$only) challengetoget peole to ,hop downtown old hou';ngi.,Jo...;ng.I...rooflop' Monticello not enough variety Page80fS Neighbomood Meetings (August 2006) - Group Discussions signag. citysign>ge l,,",geproblems_Knownasabedrooln,orrn'Dunity parking-medotobebett.. competing ,,",h "bigbo~.," k..pingpeople in town. Theyl:<nd to h..d to parking in Hwy 25 - try,,, got parkingin the b.dr.- Maple GIDl'e.nd St. Cloud nos'lln.g. competition for Albertville, other '"",munitie, lack of "".'ulive style home. tornany law income permit f... are too high home. deaJingwithdtyrestrlrtinm downtownp.o.rking findinganiche lack of parking ....onable methods ofprop€rtyvalu., morenationalch.ms...,independentbusiness toad..,...".,.nl' N..duPl"'tendhowing.todrawintomwn signage Wlwlt should be done to make Downtown Monticello a better lout Ion for retail businessul (Business only) add "greonopac." downtown downtown need ro become ,at../traft" In'uff.lncon''''ni.ntparklng addre..parking enforce",,,,etype<>tbldgd.mgnguidelin"'Q laceofcratived.velopmentdowntnwn boJ'in.....mu.tm..tminlmumland'cap./outer appearance standard. bert<rparking exJ'iInd.dutiliaation<>tri-.e< Iarkofmunicipalpackinglot.maintenance bert..lignageo!bu.ine.......dparking bling......,;ce indu.try downtown cle""up, betrervi.ual land.scapingpre.ent.atlon conn.cttolightrm cr.at.adowntown'on<ept-areasontoshop dewlopahousingplanfmdowntown promote "'alking diverttrafficlbyP<''' faceUftw/atheme Facelifrl g.ta,onf<n.u.for.plan(reclefineplanJ get ridofDAT team' HRA program to help remodel buildingo improve<!iuot;on.l.ignage in'reaseparking po..iblynarrowing.om. ,ldewalks I... building cocle rutri,tion. mak.t.tail...oci.tionfor..ch'n.ighbmhood' retail.rea n..d. plan to.rtract.p.dalty.hops nohistori,buildlngsforadr.w-bulldo<or not c1e.ign.d to get.hopper' parkben,h".olltdoor<af<\ Whathctors make Monticello a good place to operate an Indllstrlal bllilness? (Business only) betweenT/C.ndSt.C1oud fr....aya<<..' layertaxbas.! building. hooked to dty""roi[Os guodacces.towork.thic.ndeducation locatlon-194.fr"w'ya<c... Bus,n...Ret.ntion-eg.HwindowsBuilding greatbuff..wnesbetweencomm.rdal.nd locationfreewil)l' re,idential Havehousingmixed capacity'V1lilable for utilities (=ept"water- related"indunri..)..aterpres'ure"ewer, .lectricity <ostpara".."ys.metro eg,lndu,trialPark decent.chool">,st.m "'SJ'''''''''.on&offthefree...y eclucated& good <mpplyofw<>rkfoJ'Ce establish.dinfras.,.uotu" ho.pital 1.94.free..ay.cc... landcost,ta>:es landfor.buck locationremovestheoommunityi,.u. locaton of94 freew"l' 101. oflndustrwland tobuild on manyutUityarecomp.titiy. pn>ximitytoMpls/St.P.ul WhatarethechallengllsforoperatinganlndustrlalbllslneS51nMontIcellol(BlI.lnessonly) aa....ibilityfromfr..w"l'toth.bulin... enYironm<."Iltalimp.ot-n.:tttore,idential-.of.. bckoffiberoptiu nap",bl.n;sexpeti.nced bothqu.lityandql1antityofworkfotce financial 'UppOI'l for "",.U bu.in<!".' (establishedj Li.Yingwag. communic.tion.othepublicknowsthey.reth.r. Gasprkes.locationloolcingforinduottywh.r. MinnesotataJreshigh tm.wouldbe1es,of.factor Competition from other communities ,omprehensin/consi,tentzoningbw ,onfliotingritypolides tonoistent,cIependab1entilities edutating the (ommunity on what "-~ey do healrh c... <o.ts op.rationsofdtyutility hourly wag. noweqnal to mpb parking ifthefuo:elO..ldoenotbecomecertifiedoutta>l..prop.rtytaxe, willgouplackof':<e<:ntivebouse, inabilitytoacces,h..lthr<'re (drug te'ting) rlve.crossmg What are the three (]) hut locatloni for future Industrial developmen tllBu5lnessonly] Adj"entofl,94atne"'westin'en:ba.nge(2) Ch.lo..Roild.....tof F.llon E...tofS11l2S.nd:sontbofCRI06 Adj.cen'ofl-94""",tof exi.tingcomme"ial (3) Ea..of:.ludLake South of Otter Creeklndu.trial I'ark (2) Adj"entofl-94--.tofgo]ftours.(2) Wllal are the most Important things tll actompllsh In updating the Comphrehen51ve Planl (Buslnus lInly) acWre..ingtr.fficandp.rking definitiveandb.l.n,edlandu..d.sign.t. l.ndu,. aw.reofcompetition.",nnd:ns d:et.rminingthewest.rlyinterch.ngesndriyer long tenn indw;triallandplanning crossing donotcondomndowntownbusine....atexpen.. ofh.lpingtraffic n""ibilityof.lngleu..bllSin",.lblgbox'rot.' buildin.budget and keep operatio=l tho plan canw.,upport&ehoo1'l'''em dty not to mkmmanag. regulation, Communityinput(twowaycommunication) ,ompreh.nsiv.guidelineforpladngind:u"'1'and re&idneti.linpropetgeographka",.. ,on,..ntion(mter .hould:b.b.loolringin'o po,sibility? bigh end houoing high end: indu,try higher.ndhom..! keopparks.ndp.th",.y, What can be dDne 10 attract more .Ilvlng wage~ JlIbs tll Montkellol (Business lInly) beaw.reoia>mpetitionio.jobs fiber optic. fiberopti",need.d betterd.oign,oadstofutnre Susrootes/.eroice-morepubUctransporta,;on business retention continuetogro..t.sid.nti.l.ndSlayinbal.nce Deyelopo>mmoJ'Ci.l.ndindu..rialb.se education MonticelloCompreh.nslvePIaIlUpd~te focu.cityfntureTIPin""..m.nttoinduSlry grow h.alth <are & 'upp<>rt.ervi<e growyourownlocalbusinesses;retainbnsin.."", high.ndindu.try-BostonSdentific,etc. lnvitemedic.allsped.lty mixeduo.oilanddowntown/u./.outhMonti; mor.flexibilityon.ignordinanc. morede6nedre,identi.l&cornm.rdalgwdelin.. .oMonti,ellocanbe"btanded" planforinfr...ru'tute prepare utility infrastructr. rublictran,port.tion-bu'roBigLakeetc.Al,<>. bu,terrninal-veter.ns buo "<>p from St Cloud '0 Mpl. are.-get.,topin Monticello ro.dplanninglttaffkcontrolthtoughdty les,restrictiyedtypolicy' moreupperendhou.sing qu.lityoflocaledu<atlon suppott&ehool.forhighqualityjobs.ndtr.inlng .upporteclint'r.stnI(ture.,dtygmw, technology Tochnology. fib.. opti<s Traffi( traffic traffic especiallyiordowntownbusine.se. trafficandp.rkingdowntown p.r""Ptionproblem traffic 'peed'oa f""t! promotejointcitylbus,,,,,,.lead.,.,hipgroup reU.....bottleneckttafHca'bridge/Hwy25 remove bump ont,/tr.., tak. aw.yparldngspace sndtr....block.ignage renovate retail. not hou.ing! mads d"igned togotofast slgn.ge take.dvantageofth.riy.r walk...ybridgeovor25 roomf<>tr...id.ntlalgrowth T;uclncentive. tax Intently.sIland $1.00 the new-park watertreatm.ntplsntthatcanhandl.n..dsand ~~'" workforce workforcehanlworking,d:edic.tedre&iden" "..,tkingonotherinfrastructure roada..emen.. .ocutityls.fotyi..u.. .kill.dbbor 'treetm.aintenan<elntonoinentbywher.you.re inMonti TilXln,entive, ta>les maybo higher tecbnology-fiberoptics W.,tofC.meron.!\venu.lNorthofCR3S W"toiSTH25and.outhofCRl06 oignage i..u..-bulin... friendly stoplightsfromhelll tak.ild.vantag.ofou.geogr.phiclorotion tak. care ofex:istingoriginal dtyof Montic.llo properrommerci.landr.oid.ntial T.k.inatcountanyinfringementonpublic wetlandsln.turalw.te....ys traffi, u.eoith.river-w,needtotake.dvant.geo!th. river!' wat.rI,ewer-pl.naheadforpubli,utilitie, therighthousingmix-"moy. up" hou'ing. Middle "hou'.. Tr.mc-kmkat.paedunit.-downscboolblyd:,up Ch.lse. n.ar River City Lanes training dollan to...i't employed: tr.nsportation workwithrorporatiorn(XXXXXX) workingwithexp.nding/grow.Compani.,wehaye http://www.embraceopenspace.org/EOSReport/EOSSurvey.htm 10/4/2006 EMBRACE 0 PEN SPA C E Page 1 of 1 e5B . 2005 Twin Cities Metro Area Public Opinion Survey The public opinion survey is part of a comprehensive evaluation of the economic value of open space from the public education campaign, Embrace Open Space. It provides insight into how much Twin Citians value open space. Key Survey Findings: . Nearly two-thirds of Twin Cities residents would pay between 10 percent and 25 percent more for a home that was within walking distance to an open space. . Among all metro residents, 71 percent said they would pay at least 10 percent more for a home within walking distance of an open space. Among residents who have recently moved, 70 percent said they would pay at least 10 percent more; among those who intend to move soon, 69 percent said they would pay at least 10 percent more. . By a 70 percent - 24 percent margin, residents would support a $30 per year property tax increase to raise funds for purchasing, restoring, and maintaining natural areas in their county. . Residents reporting they are "velY satisfied" with nearby open space are more active in their communities. Residents who are "very satisfied" with the amount of nearby amount space also are more likely to have stronger ties to their entire community than others; 50 percent of those very satisfied with the nearby open space say they feel a real tie to their city or township compared to 40 percent of all respondents who felt close ties. . There is a similarity in the data between older, more affluent residents and younger, middle-income Twin Citians. .ifty-eight percent of residents between 35 and 54 were willing to pay between 10 percent and 25 percent more for a ome within walking distance of open space, compared to 53 percent of those 55 and older. . In 2002, Dakota County passed a referendum to raise property taxes for open space acquisition and preservation. Most Dakota County residents still see great value in preserving open space; for example, 73 percent agree with the statement, "even if the land acquired for preservation is not in my immediate area, Dakota County should preserve open space as a legacy for the future." . Most Dakota County residents think the referendum funds allowed preservation to occur in key parts of Dakota County. Bya 47 percent-7 percent margin, residents agree that the referendum allowed Dakota County to acquire and preserve open spaces in spite of significant development throughout the county. Methodology: This study was conducted by Decision Resources Ltd., a Minneapolis research firm. It contains the results of a telephone survey of 500 randomly selected residents of the eleven-county Metropolitan Area. In addition, a "balloon" sample of Dakota County residents was undertaken to bring their number to 400 respondents. Survey responses were gathered between August 15th and September 6th, 2005. In general, random samples such as this yield results projectable to the entire universe of adult Greater Metropolitan Area residents within :t.:4.5 % in 95 out of 100 cases; in the case of Dakota County residents, the results are projectable within x 5.0 % in 95 out of 100 cases. . DECISWN RESOURCES, L TD Page I of 5 . V&e1S1f>>t iIi!&StJU*Re&S, .L7D. REPORT OF FINDINGS Embrace Open Space 2005 Metropolitan Area Study 66 Methodology: This study contains the results of a telephone survey of 500 randomly selected residents of the eleven-county Metropolitan Area. In addition, a "balloon" sample of Dakota County residents was undertaken to bring their number to 400 respondents. Survey responses were gathered by professional interviewers between August 15th and September 6th, 2005. The average interview took twenty-two minutes. In general, random samples such as this yield results projectable to the entire universe of adult Greater Metropolitan Area residents within ,"4.5 % in 95 out of I 00 cases; in the case of Dakota County residents, the results are projectable within'" 5.0 % in 95 out of 100 cases. Residential Demographics: Nineteen percent of Greater Metropolitan Area residents rent their current residences. The median home value reported by owners is $271,000.00. Nineteen percent live in the core cities, while 58% are suburbanites, 11 % reside in small towns, and 12% live in rural areas. Twenty-nine percent report moving to their present residences within the past five years, while 19% lived there for more than 20 years. The median residential longevity is 9.2 years, indicative of an area with high mobility. Seventy-eight percent found the type of community they were looking for the last time they m., while 16% settled for living in another type of community. While 19% plan to move during the next five ye.52% report no plans to change their residences. Businesses or corporations employ 48% ofthe respondents. Twenty percent are retired, while 12% work for goverrunent agencies or political subdivisions. Nine percent are self-employed, seven percent do not work, and two percent work in the home. Twenty percent have yearly pre-tax household incomes ofless than $35,000.00; 39% report incomes of$35,000.00-$75,000.00; and, 33% post annual incomes over $75,000.00. Eight percent report their monthly expenses are exceeding their monthly income; 37% are meeting their monthly expenses but are putting aside little or no savings; 34% are managing comfOliably while putting some money aside, while 18% are managing very well. Thirty-eight percent repOli children under 18 years old live at home. Twenty-two percent of the respondents are 18-34 years old, while 50% are 35-54 years old, and 27%, over 55 years old. Thirty percent describe themselves as "born again" or evangelical Christians. Women outnumber men in the sample by two percent. Hennepin County residents account for 39% of the sample, with Ramsey County at 16%, Dakota County at 12% and Anoka County at 10%. Eight percent live in Washington County, while seven percent reside in Carver or Scott County. Isanti, Chis ago, Sherburne, and Wright County residents are eight percent of the sample. All demographic results of the sample are within acceptable statistical limits of the actual updated U.S. Census findings. Key Metropolitan Area Findings: I.. quality oflife rating residents award their communities is very positive. Eighty-nine percent rate the quality of life as either "excellent" or "good," with 10% rating it more negatively. During the past three years, 55% think the quality of life has "stayed the same," while 22% see an improvement and 20%, a decline. 2. For significant numbers of residents, the area closest to their homes is missing the following amenities: shops or http://www.embraceopenspace.orglEOSReport/2005MetAreaStudy.htm 10/4/2006 DECISION RESOURCES, LTD Page 2 of 5 restaurants within walking distance of their home, undeveloped land, public transportation within walking distance, and housing for people with low incomes. The table below arrays residential opinions about the availability of thirteen community characteristics in their immediate areas: http://www.embraceopenspace.org/EOSReport/2005MetAreaStudy.htm 10/4/2006 Too Much About Right Too Lit/Ie Shops or restaurants within walking distance of our house 2% 53% 44% Undevelo ed land Public trans ortation within walkin distance 1% 1% 4% 7% 0% 2% 2% 7% 0% 1% 16% 11% 53% 57% 51% 62% 72% 70% 74% 71% 79% 80% 68% 76% 43% 39% 35% 27% 25% 25% 20% 20% 19% 18% 13% 9% Lar e discount or warehouse stores Sidewalks Wetlands, reserves, and natural habitats Housin for eo Ie with moderate incomes New stores and offices bein built Parks and la ounds Places to walk, bike, and exercise outdoors for fun New houses and a artments bein built ws do not add to 100% because the percentage of re" res onses is excluded. A majority of residents are satisfied with the amount of open space close to where they live. Thirty-seven percent are "very satisfied," while 39% are "somewhat satisfied." Eighteen percent, though, are either "somewhat dissatisfied" or "very dissatisfied." Almost identical percentages of residents are also satisfied with the amount of open space generally available for public enjoyment. 3. Greater Metropolitan Area residents view preserving, acqniring and restoling open space in their areas as less imp011ant than four issues: "improving the health care system," "improving public education," "attracting business and creating jobs," and "lowering the crime rate." They also view the importance of open space at least on a par with three issues: "cutting government spending," "alleviating traffic congestion," and "providing more housing for people with moderate and low incomes." 4. The typical resident is willing to pay an additional 10% for a home within walking distance of open space. In fact, 19% of the sample are willing to pay at least 25% more for a home located within walking distance. The table below arrays residents' willingness to pay a premium for a home when located near to different types of open spaces: Within Walking JVithin Five Distance klinutes b ' Car 10% More 25% More 10% More 25% More 69% 27% 47% 13% Trails and bikewa s 68% 25% 46% 13% Lake, river, or stream 75% 36% 50% 15% DECISION RESOURCES, L TD Page 3 of5 WetIands, preserves, and natural habitats 66% 24% 43% 12% 54% 20% 35% 10% · ows do not add to 100% because the percentage of "unsure" responses is excluded. When asked about specific types of open space, residents are more apt to pay a premium for a house if it were in walking distance rather within driving distance. And, regardless of distance, residents are more apt to pay more for a home nearer to a body of water than any other type of open space. 5. The typical Greater Metropolitan Area would support a property tax increase of $26.80 per year to fund the protection of, and access to, open space in their area. But, 24% would support no property tax increase for this purpose, while 27% would support at least $50.00 annually for open space purposes. The table below arrays the willingness to pay additional property taxes for the acquisition and preservation ofland to be used for various purposes: http://www.embraceopenspace.org/EOSRepOti/2005MetAreaStudy.htm 10/4/2006 Parks and la rounds Trails and bikewa s Within Walking JVithin Five Distance Minutes b Car $25 er Year $50 er Year $25 er Year $50 er Year 60% 32% 43% 16% 56% 30% 43% 17% 60% 33% 45% 19% 55% 29% 43% 17% 42% 21% 34% 13% , river, or stream etlands, preserves, and natural habitats Undevelo ed land * Rows do not add to 100% because the percentage of "unsure" responses is excluded. Residents, again, are much more likely to support a property tax increase for open space acquisition and preservation when it is within walking distance oftheir homes. This time, however, bodies of water do not stand out in terms of its support levels - every type of purpose, except undeveloped land, elicits about the same levels of support. 6. By a solid 70%-24% margin, respondents support a $30.00 per year propeliy tax increase to raise funds for purchasing, restoring, and maintaining natural areas in their county. Enthusiastic support is 30%, while solid opposition is only 12%. Still, the advantage for passage of this bond referendum, assuming only strong supporters, but all opponents, vote, is a narrower +6%. 7. Residents rate the sense of community in their local area very favorably. Seventy-four percent rate it "excellent" or "good," while 21 % see it as "only fair" or "poor." They split, though, on their closest cOill1ection - 40% have "a real tie to their city or township," while 40% "have strong ties to their neighborhood, but weak ties to the rest of the community." 8. In repoliing patiicipation in different community activities, the average resident engaged in 4.5 out of a potential ll~ajorities report participating in: "voted in the 2004 Presidential Election between George W. Bush and John K." "voted in the last local election held in your community," "run, walk, or bike on local trails and paths," "attended a community-wide celebration or event during the past year," or "attended a neighborhood event during the past year." DECISION RESOURCES, L TO Key Dakota County Findings: Page 4 of 5 I. There was a high participation level in the 2002 Open Space Referendum in Dakota COW1ty. Forty-three percent of thApondents report voting in the November 2002 Dakota County Open Space Referendum. Among voters, 58% re~ supporting the ballot issue, 19% report opposing, and 23% are unsure of their vote. 2. Most residents see no improvements resulting from the ballot initiative. Forty-six percent think it has made "no difference," while 28% are "unsure" and four percent, a "negative impact." Only three percent report a "significant improvement" and 20% report a "minor improvement" in their local area. http://www.embraceopenspace.org/EOSReport/2005MetAreaStudy.htm 10/4/2006 3. Only one-third of Dakota County residents think the land parcels acquired for preservation were well planned for the future of the County. Twenty percent disagree, while almost one-half are uncertain. 4. A solid majority believes that "even if the land acquired for preservation is not in my immediate area, Dakota County should preserve open space as a legacy for the future." Seventy-three percent agree with this statement, while four percent disagree, and 23% are unsure. 5. Residents are split about the potential impact of the successful referendum. Bya 34%-26% margin, residents agree that "the amount ofland that can be purchased because of the Open Space Referendum is not enough to really positively impact the quality oflife for most County residents. Forty percent, though, are uncertain. 6. Most residents think the referendum n.mds allowed preservation to occur in key parts of Dakota County. By a 47%- 7% decision, residents agree "in view of the high rate of residential and commercial development in Dakota County, the Open Space Referendum has allowed us to acquire and preserve open spaces in key areas of the County." A large 46% are uncertain. 7. A majority of Dakota County residents are unable to comment on their judgment of the referendum. Only two peat think their expectations were "surpassed," while 26% judge them as being "met," and 17%, repOli "dJl!lllll!\'pointment." Fifty-five percent, though, came to no conclusion. 8. Support for another open space referendum, increasing property taxes by $30.00 annually, is lower than the Greater Metropolitan Area level, but still positive. Bya solid 62%-33% margin, respondents support a $30.00 per year property tax increase to raise funds for purchasing, restoring, and maintaining natural areas in their county. Enthusiastic support is 23%, while solid opposition is 16%. This time, the advantage for passage of this bond referendum, again assuming only strong supporters and all opponents vote, is - 10%, a formidable challenge in a non- presidential year election. . DECISION RESOURCES, L TO Page 5 of5 Conclusions: .. Respondents who are "very satisfied" with the amount of open space close to home rate the quality oflife in . their communities higher than others. Ninety-seven percent of this group rates it positively, in comparison with - 89% of the entire sample; and, 48% rate the quality oflife as "excellent" compared with 30% of the whole sample. Similarly, "very satisfied" residents are more apt to report the quality of life has "gotten better" _ 28% versus 22%. · Not surprisingly, majorities of residents "very satisfied" with the amount of open space close to home rate all but one of seven issues - providing more housing for people with moderate and low incomes - as "more important" than the preservation, acquisition, and restoration of open space in their local area. .. More "very satisfied" residents are unwilling to increase their property taxes to fund the protection and access to open space in their area - 32% versus 24%. Even so, they are no different than the sample as a whole in supporting a $30.00 per year property tax increase for this purpose. .. Respondents who are "very satisfied" with the amount of open space close to home rate the general sense of community in their local area higher than the overall sample. Eighty-four percent rate it "excellent" or "good," compared with 75% in the whole sample. Only 12% rate the sense of community negatively, in comparison to the 22% overall. lttp:/ /www.embraceopenspace.org/EOSReport/2005MetAreaStudy.htm 10/4/2006 .. "Very satisfied" residents also have stronger ties to their entire community: 50% versus 40%. Stronger ties to their neighborhood drops from 46% to 33% within this group. II Residents reporting they are "very satisfied" with nearby open space are more active in their communities. They report on average participating in 5.0 out of 11 activities; residents who are not "very satisfied" post a . lower mean participation rate of 4.16 activities. e Dakota County residents do not possess sufficient information to rate either the efforts or the impact of the 2002 Open Space Referendum. Except for those living nearby an acquired property, communications about the process appears severely limited. ~ DECISION RESOURCES, L TD Pagelof5 . V&e1S'lmt 1<&s()U~e&s, ,e7D, SUPPLEMENTARY REPORT OF FINDINGS Embrace Open Space 2005 Metropolitan Area Study Key Findings: The_Active I{ousing Market: The tables below alTay the willingness to pay a premium for a home when located near different types of open spaces among two key housing market groups - residents who have moved within the past two years and residents intending to move during the next two years: http://www.embraceopenspace.orglEOSReport/EmbraceOpenSpaceSurveybyDRL.htm 10/4/2006 Less than two years at present residence Within Walking Within Five Distance Minutes bv Car 10% More 25% More 10% More 25% More Parks and olay,grounds 54% 26% 38% 22% Trails and bikeways 50% 22% 40% 16% Lake, river, or stream 70% 38% 50% 16% IIlands, preserves, and natural 62% 22% 40% 12% [tats Undeveloned land 48% 20% 26% 8% Moving from current residence in two vears or less Within Walking Within Five Distance Minutes bv Car 10% More 25% More 10% More 25% More Parksandnlav~rounds 69% 31% 56% 13% Trails and bikeways 63% 28% 50% 13% Lake, river, or stream 81% 31% 63% 16% Wetlands, preserves, and natural 65% 19% 50% 13% habi tats Undeveloped land 56% 22% 41% 13% In both cases, majorities indicate a willingness to pay an additional 10% for a home within walking distance of most tY.f open space; sufficiently large percentages of each group are also willing to pay an additional 25% for nearby op pace. As expected, percentages decline somewhat if the open space is within driving distance rather than walking distance. Willingness. to SUj2port aIlD]:len Spil,:e RefeL~ndllJn: DECIsrON RESOURCES, L TD Page 2 of 5 The tables below array the willingness to support a $30.00 per year property tax increase for the acquisition, restoring, and maintaining of open space in their county by various demograhic groups: ~pport or Oppose $30.00 per Year Property Tax Increase for Maintaining Natural Areas in the County Support Oppose Unsure Hennepin County 74% 22% 4% Ramsey County 70% 24% 6% Anoka County 63% 31% 6% Dakota County 71% 21% 8% Washington County 68% 26% 5% Carver County* 79% 0% 21% Scott County 45% 45% 11% Isanti Countv* 83% 17% 0% Chisago Countv* 78% 22% 0% Sherburne Countv* 75% 25% 0% Wright County 65% 29% 6% * indicates subsample size of less than 15 respondents T.e major Metropolitan Area Counties show strong support for this type of referendum. One cautionary note, however: opposition reaches the 30% level in Anoka County, indicative of a rougher election. http://www.embraceopenspace.org/EOSReport/EmbraceOpenSpaceSurveybyDRL.htm 10/4/2006 Support or Oppose $30.00 per Year Property Tax Increase for Maintaining Natural Areas in the County Support Oppose Unsure Republican 72% 24% 4% Democrat 78% 18% 5% Independence 40% 40% 20% Green * 100% 0% 0% Independent 69% 29% 2% Other 53% 47% 0% Unsure/Refused 43% 34% 23% * indicates subsamnle size of less than 15 resDondents With the exception offndependence Party, all party groups decisively support an open space referendum at this price po.. Support or Oppose $30.00 per Year Property Tax Increase for Maintaining Natural Areas in the County DECISION RESOURCES, L TD Liberal Unsure/Refused Page 3 of 5 Su ort 0 ose Unsure 65% 31% 4% 76% 12% 9% 76% 19% 5% 43% 38% 19% * indicates subsllm le size 0 less than 15 res ondents Similarly, all ideology groups register strong support; even conservatives split by over two-to-one in favor ofthe referendum. lttp:/ /www.embraceopenspace.orglEOSReport/EmbraceOpenSpaceSurveybYDRL.htm 10/4/2006 . . DECIsrON RESOURCES, L TD Page 4 of5 DAKOTA COUNTY RESIDENTS ONLY .pport or Oppose $30.00 per Year Property ax Increase for Maintaining Natural Areas in the Countv Support Oppose Unsure Developing/Rosemount, Farmington, Hastings, and 71% 26% 3% Rural Early Stage Maturing/Eagan and Inver Grove 59% 34% 7% Heights Late Sta"e MaturinglBumsville and Apple Valley 63% 32% 5% Fully MaturelMendota, Mendota Heights, West 53% 44% 3% Saint Paul, and South Saint Paul * indicates subsamnle size of less than 15 respondents Support levels across Dakota County differ, although each tier registers a majority in favor of the proposal. The older, mature areas split 53%-44% in favor ofthe referendum, while the "tax sensitive" cities of Eagan and lnver Grove Heights register a weaker positive decision. Willingnes~to Pay Additional fOLa HousS<....t-rear Open Space: Residents were queried about the additional percentage they would pay for a house if it were near open spaces. The taWeIow shows the responses for two political demographics: Willing to Pav at least 10% for a house within Walking Distance of Ooen Soaces PercentaJ!e Republican 74% Democrat 73% Indenendence 40% Green* 100% lndenendent 77% Other 80% Unsure/Refused 52% Conservati ve 69% Moderate 73% Liberal 80% Unsure/Refused 57% ~cates subsamnle size ofless than 15 respondents All political party groups, except Independence Party members, register very high percentages of adherents willing to pay at least 10% more for a house near open spaces. Among the main ideological groups, similar significant percentages are registered. b.ttp:/ /www.embraceopenspace.org/EOSReport/EmbraceOpenSpaceSurveybyDRL.htm 10/4/2006 DECISION RESOURCES, L TD Page 5 of5 WjlliIlg!le.~~.JQ.SupportJ\.Iax InQrea!i~liLPI91ect Open Space: RAnts were queried about the size of the tax increase they would support to preserve open space in their county. Th'l!l!!l'ble below shows the responses for two political demographics: Willing to Pay at least $10.00 per Year More in Property Taxes for Onen Snace Protection Percental?e Renublican 60% Democrat 67% Indenendence 43% Green* 67% Indenendent 64% Other 46% Unsure/Refused 59% Conservative 55% Moderate 72% Liberal 64% tA-e/Refused 47% * indicates subsamnle size of less than 15 resnondents http://www.embraceopenspace.org/EOSReport/EmbraceOpenSpaceSurveybyDRL.htm 10/4/2006 The same pattern appears seen in the case of additional money for a home nearby open spaces. All party groups, with the exception of Independence Party members, post majorities in favor of at least a $10.00 per year property tax increase. Similarly, all ideological groups post majorities, but the lower majority among conservatives is noteworthy. The Impact ofSatisfactiQ!1 with OJ:len Spac:k.Q!lJh.~Qllality oLLife: In a standard regression analysis, higher levels of satisfaction with local area open space positively impacted the quality oflife rating of the community. In fact, satisfaction with area open space accounts for a significant 13% of the variation in quality oflife ratings. Consequently, this attribute should be cousidered a key contributor the general quality oflife in an area. . o o o N I o O"J O"J ...... 0:- ::> o <:<: c.'l '" U o ... '" >< '" Z o ~ ... ::> '" o '" z - ~ , ~ ~~ '" 'E.5 c ~ ~ j i]H.~ ~ ~I~H < . . ,. 8~ .. t;;~ i ~E .::; .5::1 ., 1 ; ! .. o "Iii ...., i ~ ~ ~ o ~om:t i ~~~~! l:~~'t j ., ~ .. .., "to:"":: :!H.~~ ~~~~~ ~ ... ~ ~~ .., joo> _ il- c .. "! .!~i~ XP..C"E a: :s;:5 :..,~~~~"'~ ... ~.lj!..:1.9:~E.f!~~.f! ~ ~~~!g.~~~~~~ ~ , . ~ ,> " " s~ titi g't~~H~ ~~.. ~:J:~:E c.!n:;r:;l:l3: ........,...... ::EZZZZZZ ; 1 t..fIlc "'''''''0 ~jjh 3J3~i . 1 .!:~ !(~j ~.!.! ~~g. '" . . . ~.'='& ;'~1il .H.s: ::Iii _0 ,., .' 0 i~~ ." . 'iii~ 5 :B:~ 'f . t~ ~~ ti.. i~:sr5~ 001:0""" ~..J <e"''S ~ .:!liiliilii&l'iil 3 ~~ 0" u ;5 zz i , ~~~~~~~~..Jj~~~3j~~::E~~ii~~~~~~z~~i~~~~~~~g~~~~a::~~~~~~~~~~~~&~~~~~~~~~~~5~~~~~~~;~ <:<: <: "' >< <:<: "' '" "' c.'l z ::: u '" c.'l f:i z '" u <:<: '" "- " ~ . ~ > ~ a I"" ~ ~J~i ~ ~I..I li..~l :i E Ct t!l "',_..... '" "' 'll ~;;; 0:1: .. 0"'> 0 cS~o.9"2c~:~~!:J:o "">]c~~oj~~~ c"Eo~~~~lu"~""i~o~5~e~t~E~~~ ~~s~~~~o8086~S~~ffi~~~~~~~~~~i .;; z o G "' e<:: ... <: <:<: f-< Z '" U e<:: Z Q g '" "' z z - :;; "'- R ;:; G;' 0;- 0;- R 0 ~ <Xl 0 '" M '" "' - - t:- ::;. C 8 C ~ <lJ ------- '. '" c: "'- "'- "'- "'- "'- m 0 0 0 c 0 - - '" ~ '" <lJ .c: ~ "tl U - '7 0 - N 0 C c: , E CIl 0 '" .'" 0 0 0 0 0 ~ CIl m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 /i ... :; "'- Cl. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 --"_~_.J 0- 0 ~ 0 ~ N M ro 0 , c: 'C .02 '" . II . . <lJ '" - p.. -< :;; '" 'S m "- ui :'! "" D C - ro ~ ~ ru 0 '" 0 c ro e ru t; D .~ ~ ~ :2' ro 0 S U ill .c: ~ .~ " u 0 D ru Db c D -- ro '0 0 ru J'] 51 6 ~ i" u 0 rn ru u oS rn oS oS 'S ~ oS " ru ]; " 00 ru '" ~ .a ." g "" " >= "! ~ w '" 9 c ~ 0 rn " ro ~ ro t; m ~ ru oS ro S ro oS rn i" 6 ~ c ro c oS C D U ~ C m c 0 ~- ro Cl. e u .c: m " 1V ~ 0 E '" Db ru :2' u oS B ii c ~ ~ .c: '0 "" t ru 0 ~ 1" c t; c 0 W 0 u 'Qi;, :5 s i" 0 ru '" f; "" 6 u " ro E u ~ ~ D E ~ ~ D .a g ~ ~ ~ m .a ill OS i" m ro ~ m s ill U ~ oS Db ~ ~ '3 ru I ~ .a '" C 6 0 ~ E 0 ro 0 E N cD 0 U .D U C ~ ru m .D oS 0 ~ "" '" ~ ~ S W ru c 'S '" <lJ 0 ru B s D C 0 1V ro "' .a '" ~ ro D c W '" 0 > E ~ 0 ~ 0 c -ro 0 9 i" 0 ro ro Cl. 'S c " 0 ~ 0 ~ Cl. 0 ru u Cl. '" c ru e m E 1" .c: ro U '" c c; . ill- 00 . ~ C . .'3 '" 0 " .2 ;:t c ~ ,; ii N :0- N :0- ~ Q;' c ~ !:::- ~ L '" ::. ~ e (L ~ ::C w OJ U ~ L ~ C U ~ Z '" ". en " 0 W ~ M '" '" M W '~ ,;i "- 'tl " ~ .,. en L ';; "- I: ~' oj M' 0 '0 > ru w .. E .0 ~ E '" ~ ~ 2' .8 2 0 0 6 ~ en .. ~ ~ ~ z c; Z .... ~ 0: oi "- c 0 .,. '" M en '" w . " ~ " .,. '" " c -, :s - " N en M 0 CD V) N' ",' - I: ~ z ,; c ::: > .~ 0 Ci i5 <( '" w '" := 0. ro ~ w en " ~ 2:: x oi " '" c w E '{ "- ill Z " 0 ~ ~ " Z " - '" E - > . . en 00 , en .!! I c f- ;;: ~ ~ 0 ~ u .... .f5 ~ (L ~ w 0 w u in '" "5 l' '" 0 M '" U 0 C M ;;: ru ,,- := 00 en c Z c a .... " ~ is ~ TO :8 E ro 0 u f- m w " u " TO ~ ro "' ~ ru '" i; c c g .2 < ,< ro ru '" ~ > z . ~ ru '" "- ~ ~ - 0 "<::: ..q "- ::; . 1;; :=: 8. j 0 w U 0 E ~ C (L w ru ~ 0 0 , 1 E >- E '" " 00 " f- If') ~ c ~ ....:; L D - ::8 0 , ;;; ~ u TO 10 0 .. ru 0 ~--_.._----- ,;,; ~ 0 ~ N ~ S c >- I ,~ 0 f- ] - TO in Z 0: u c .~ 01 ~ :=: ro TO := ro .0 0 01 E ~ ~ '"" " ~ U ro ~ ;.:- ,,' ~ , U ru '"" f- .7 0 c 0 C ,E '"" ::; N 0 TO Db ~ en ~ , c c .Q '" < ro '~ f:: - 1 0 C u g <, ~~t 0 ru - -. '. 0 ~ ru U Z " , : 'I ~ .2' N .0 ,. o' -g~ :i - > j >< E := ~ ~~ c c Ii .., ~;;1i c " Z ;;: cu!js",s n: w 0 w g c [i: a t"E ~g ~ j ~ L~ ~~ 'S ~ ~ >- I :f~HH " ". U5!~ Ol '" m E- '" -------- .--- - --,-~.- iiii5tl5 :z:u...u....... o. >>. ilI.:H co 0: :8 ,..""""" " .<0 M (L ~ ~ . ~ '0 ,n.nTI III i ';-''':]''\""q:'!Jl?q " . " ~ ~; '" -e J r: ~ e j~~~ii~ ~j~j~~~ < . . ,. .!S'2 ~ilii~ ..."....! ... ~ -";tj ;:jJJ".:J . .~ E -; ! c ~ ~ j ~ ] ~..~].~ ~ "" 11: a; ~ & z 8So:c;:~ ". . ~:~.gh E..!~~~ ~ ~j~f~~ ,hi Iii oUU ~ 'i! -!... ~... 13 ~=~~~~~~ ~i~~~~~ i~~ Io-e -" i Z..~~t~"'~~~I=~~~ ~=~,~o ~ ~ JI!:!~51~5-,,~~i~i~~iil~i ! : ~t~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~g~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ /O~. ~ . '.~;~ ~ ~ J -- ~ ~. ~ "'~.~~~ ~ :t9j~~i 1: " " ~ ~ ,,~~ ~~~] !~K~~~~ ~...... .. ~ t' 'l: .. .. .. :I 0 '" .:.~.!].! ~0l"'.:E:E",:E r: ......" ... ~ :c :c :c !l: !l: t: ;!: i!~:U~iLHH!~~~ ~~~i~~S~...j~~~~~~~:E~~i~~~~i~~z~~i~~~~~~~8~~~~~~~~~m~~~~~~~~~~~~m~~~~~~~s~~~;~g~~~ M o o N :><- t: ....; '" Q, U - z ~ :E :>< '" en c:l ...l :2 ~ en - - o :I: o o ...... '" '" "- en '" o - . " 0 . . 'i! 2 ",;!i t ~ ~ ~ ~ ;~t- ~ ~~ ~ E~ ~] =Er: ~ ~..S'l:~! ..] !~~~ ~~:>p ~~~~s~1r:"':"~m.O "'~~r:"'~u~~~~ ~ .. E g g;~ 1: ~ 8'~:s! 1 ~ t:i i~ " ~ n s ~ t' ~ E:!i! t: ~ <~i~I~~o8086u5~~~~~~~~~~~8~i , , ~ 8 ~ ,0 _.J '0 '~ o " 8 ~ ~ " . " ~ o p. , E I~ o I ~ o ~ ID " " i -....1-.. ~ ~ " a ,~ o z o i3 '" ~ ...l '" '" f-< Z '" U ~ Z o < f- o en '" Z Z - ~ .. . ~ ! 0 , N e;;- M F:' e;;- N <Xl ~ 2- ~ [::, 0 :!- :!- !2 " ' ,M ~ ~g _N '" ~ .5 ~ .E!.;:l -,,< ~ , " "' ": N 0 "- ,~ ~ 0 "' "- 0 .0 :-'l:: I "tl " ~ N "' " '" " tH~; ~ ~ L .:liE C ~ 0.. ~ : " ro E '" > .8 .8 .8 .8 0.. E i; " ~ L .~ :: ...I ro 0.. l'J 0 N ~ N i,3g 2 0 0 "' m ~:a on 0 ~ ,..: '" ~ '" '0 " ~ N "' " '" 0.. l~ ""J '" ~ ~ z );:~ .. " . iii 0 0 . . 0 0" " , :@~ lfl "" '" :is -=---~" _""'__"~""'_~o,~...,. H"M'N_"N~ ~ > ro L " "" :c vi ro ~ .e ~ c c oj ~ u ~ .0 ro ro u ~ > ~ 21 ~ ~ '" -'" ro '0 ~ " u u c c E c c ~ " ~ ~ u u 0 c 0 '''' c OJ c c: ~ u E " 0 .~ c ij c 0 ro ~ ~" ~ -'" " c ~ > 0 " ~ 1D c ~ '" 0 0 " U I '" u ~ vi ~ u ~" m c 0 '0 c U) L e 0 'C" 00 ~ CL ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ c ~ U 0 L " 5 'C u5 0 w E S cO -E' " ~ 0 ~ tio > ~ Q 'E c ~ ~ ~ .0 0 C C "- ~ ~ g u - CD L .0 :"; t ,,,- ro ~ 0 c rn ru ~ u ~ c w 0 " M 2 ~ ro '6 ~ 0 '6 ~ j'; > ~ ro ~ U ~ ~ ro " c ,~ ~ ~ 0 00 vi ~ ;;; l' .e ~ ~ ~ .Q U '-' .0 m 2 5 ~ ~ ~ ~ 'C > m .e c 0 ~ ~ 2 .0 D ro > ~ " " ~ ~ U) ~ 'C :5 ~ " " D 0 "- 0.. ~ 2 D ~ ~ 0" m .0 0 C ~ "- 50 ro 2 rn c 0 or c c 00 " 'C 1" l' u ~ " '-' c " c 0.. ~ 5 ~ ~ u 0 E " " L 5 E f- " 0 " a vi u u ~ c ~ ~ ~ 0 5 0 u t c c ~ '-' ~ Q " ro c c ro -" ~ ~ u ~ ~ " 0 " ~ ~ 5 Q C D C ,g ~ c ro " u rn 5 ~ .0 5 "- 'C g ~ 0 ;;; ~ L ~ '-' ~ ~ E eo ~ 5 ~ -" a E ~ E L <u '" C vi l' m " .0 m :I D ,Q.. c "Vi , J;! co ~ c c ~ 5 0 .Q Q C Q 2 e "" ~ 2 1D m D Q.. ~ E 'u rn E ~ E " Q C L ~ E a f- " U ...., oR ~ 0' 0;- 0;- <<: 0 ~ <Xl en N ~g 0:: to M 2C en ~ <Xl ::'- ~ "0 e- M ~ .N Z fi5 '" Q) ~g I U '" .2::"- II c oR oR oR ~.5 ~ '" Q) 0 0 0 ~~ m m m Z "tI .c '" Q) C U c m m m ~ .g~ 0 4> c '" ~ M en 0 CI 0 .c E ~~ u f':i 4> :;:; B B B ~ oS" .... ~ Q) 0 '" .~ ~ 0 => > :;:; oR ~ " " 0- '" "~ <Xl '" 0 "" 0 0 0 0 0 "0 OJ "- '" ~g Z Q) 0 0 0 0 0 :g~ m z N " '" Z Z c " ~ , 0 :::s 0 ~ '" 0 o. . . II . Q) ~ '" Z , . , . . ~ ~~ ~~.; ~ ] e ];~i~e~~~~=5~]B ~~~~~~~~-;~~~z~~a~ e~~ ~ E~h !-g.: B~ ~ ~:H ~ ~%%~~XS~Sjj~jjSj~~ i ! '; 21 o ~ g Oi > . . . I, f z z 88 '" .~ .' . .., f",<t; ..<II a 1 '~i ; :B~ :l Q. '" ].l! ~ ~ ~ ~ ! P~~"~~~8 ~~:~ "~~zE~~~~i;.'i&~l .~lHr~.jgj~B~~ l!:::E:E%X::E::E::E:tzzzzz . ~ ~ ~~! i ~~i"~ ~~i ~~ ~ ~~~j.rPii;~ il ~~iji:nbf:":c~ <II "''''f-...;:I>>3:3::3::3:: ~~~~8f ~ ;-f~'i;;S1;l'a]=J:~ .. to ~:g.s~~hj:il}~ .~ ~ ~.s~.&~~~.~Il: ::E ".g ~~~d~;5j~:,g.~1ii Iii I:i " ~~: ~~~ '"" . .. HZ . :~ ~ g .. o <f) o N , <f) o o N ><- e- :J ~ u Z :0 :E >< '" "' e- <<: 0:: ::c e- ;;: o 0:: " Z o i= <<: ...., :0 "- o 0. o "' f-o U "' - o 0. ~~~i~~~~~~~~~3~~3%f~ff~it~~~z~~i~~~~~~~8g~~~~~~<II~:~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~;:'~>3::~~~gl~~ . . 0 . . . !!! ] ... 5 1;101..... e ~:.~ ,~~ ~" =Ee ~ : E€!S ~] ~=..~ ~!J~~ ;E~~~~1~~~]E~Xj ~~]e:~Oj~~~ 6 ~ E 0 !i::~ ~ 1;]'"j!:!! :; "''' ~= 0 5 5 1;' 3 'ij t: ,.. E:!! : ~ ~~~~:~J5Bu8oo5~~m~~~:~~~~~~i <~~~~~~58~~w~~s~w~~~~f~gij~~~ " 8 u :E ~ o ~ q -- . ~ ~ " .. " " ." " ~ ~ " ~ \7 q , j oi '" "" > C ~ ~ 0 U ~ eC- ru ~ oS 1" - q ~ '-0 2' C2 i" ~ 7 '" 8 Db 20 v: " u u w c; 0- W if, Db G m "' ~ :0 f-- 1" "' W :0 ~ u ~ c 0 0 ~ ~ ~ '" ru :0 ~ "- if, ~ C C ~ ru ~ :0 c 0 m ~ E 2 ru ~ oS ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0- .Q ~ J2 ~ " DO 0 c Db 1<j u ~ ru ro 1:3 > m ru 0 E e; ~ c- .~ 0 ro M D ~ Q.: :0 ru '" oS ro '" > ro "' to D Q) ~ D D ru ~ oS ru tC c D C 5' 0 ~ e; > ru u oS c ro " u D C ;0 0 u ru ill ~ ru B oS u E ru B u 0 ru ~ 1:3 ~ m "- ro x ~ ru Q 2 m U ro ru ~ 0 ro e; c c .~ Q "0 ;; "- ~ 2 0- W C "- E L ~ ~ ~ - e .. '" .5 .D ill VJ .~ '"::I ..0 r:n a ~ ~ o M .6 " "8 " ~ x " '" o :>, ii .0 (C .:::2 "".0 " U os i3 ~ <:i ..... ~.~ ] 0;:; l- t) 0 .E ..E U :::l ;:: ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ .g d en -5 U Q. ~ ClJ <:--. .5 8 C.l c: :3 . ~ rJJ ! e ~ .s E .s o 0 4-1 ~ ~ ~ ~ '5 .~ ~ ...:::l U ..c ci IJ.) '8 Cl .9 ~ <: -g 5 ~ ~ ~ c :s:: ~ "0 o @ u 2 .S ~ ~ ;: '" 6 '" ,. 2 "- .5 ~ " M '" -s M " " :;; "" " '" - ,9 ;:E ~ ~ :l ~ ~ :;; ~ '" M " ::: u 8 ~ .5 " .:2 -s " ~ ~ .g o M .S = E E o u ;: "0 " ~ ~ $ .~ o e.o 0 ::r: 'c;:. -S .0 'j o M M <"C Q) ... -< " <"C :~ "0 C- O ... +-' Q) ~ :>, oj 5 a ;5 ~ y 2 ;:: :s1 ~ ~ ~ ~ "0 - .~ -0 '" :>, u 6 iJ o " " "" 8 .S '" " '" o -5 '5iJ '" M M '" M M m' ~ .t C) ~ oS w .5 " -s ~ o '" u .- " ~ E ~ ~ u: 0.. ,~ .5 0. '" " '5iJ " '" .0 'j o M M '" ~ -B :;; .= "0 !?- " ;) 6 vo .:'!:: +-' o " ~ Q) ..c: +-' 4-; o ,... U <"C Q) 10:: ~ .5 vo <"C Q) ... u " ~ '" .0 .s ~ ...- o ~ I- ill C) ..... ;~-S~g t: .5 ~ :>, ;:: " " u ~ o ;J) .::;;:; CJ C ~ -s "S! g; ~ .~ ~ " :a o :>, .0 " ~ " v:. .:: (3 '0 u " ~ M "- 2 o " o u '" ~ c: ,.... ~ .B IJ.) .~ "0 -s - ;:E ~~~ ill ~ E S 53 '" ,. u t: c::; ..g Q) ..c: f-. ~ ~ ~ " ~ ~ ~ " M B ;:E "" ~ M " .:: .,.., '5 ~ .ss<a-B r:n 2 ~ .~ $: 8 ~ "0 ~gf~'8o t'-- ;e " .0 ~ :2 "0 "'6 'C;: g ~ ~ ~ N -s ..s "0 "0 IJ.) c: C a.: .~ ro .s 3 t g "0 co ro '" @ " .E en "0 8 2 ~ 'a) W E .s .0 .2. ~ M '" ;: " u ~ Q. b " ~ :>: ~ '"" o co ~ '51 -5 ~ ~ .s '" 0 gjj ~ :::l .5 ~ '" 8 -s ;: '" u ~ " m' :.0 " '" ~ .5 2 ~ '" u ",0 -a o '" "" " ;; ~ .0 .2. " ro u " '" M " " ,f ,g. = E ~ '" u ro " " .0 e- - " :>, -E ..0 ~ ~ " '" u '" " o " " ~ -5 '" " o 'M .5 '" 8 :) u ~ .~ ~ ,......1 '"d ::\:l 0 IJ.) o c "0 sr~~b ~.8 ill r:n 8 OJ $ ~ ~ .0 o IJ.) .~ o '0 13 g. '" a ill :s1 -s ~ M " ~ " ~ M .S ~ ~' c: ~ 'ill '6 Q E ro :.> ill >< ro u C) (3 '5iJ " M "0 3 ro " '" ',:r; '" y :) ~ " '" c ~ ." ;: C ill U -s g,n 'ji o M '" o " CD ro .:2 U '" (3 2 vi .0 .2. ~ .~ .~ " "0 .0 .2. '" 2 o " o u '" " .g c "" o = " 2 .0 'j " 5iJ ~ .~ ~ .s ~_'o .0 ~ -: (/) :-::: ~ " u ;; '" " ~ M B = U .0 .2. ~ :2 f- '" " .0 o f- 'Sc '" M ~ o "" " o M M '" 2 " ~ 2 M ~ '" '" ';/)-5w=2Cl.l ~.~-z~~ N c: v) ,;; crj , .9 t ii:i c: :a~E~$ ro u Ul ~ ~ ~ ..9 :a u v:. '" " 0 M " ~ 8 .s "tj " B '"2 ..!:i ~ ::; -i-' ~ ~ ~ .:: ~ S o u ~ .~ o ci U l'- co '" ~ 2 ~ o .5 .5 ~ .S ~r EO ." " ~ '" M .D .s., .D 2. vi @ '" :>, '0 ~ "" '" 0 .0 C :: 5D -2] f- M ~ Ow ~ -B " ou; ,..... " @ ...0 ...0 r.t:: ~ iJ ~ -g 5 oii VJ U U " '" " ~ -5 .5 c::: co;: ~ ~ u) .3 .5 1i3 ~ .~ :3 "5 u u ~ c .5 Ow ;:: "OJ ~ ~ ~ o :; u 0 o "0 ~ ~ .0 c .2- ~ :>, .0 "0 '" "" o o M OJ) ~ ~ ;: " u '" 'S .~ ~ ~ 0 u " ;:E "0 '" .0 f- " o ;:E '"0 .;!? o ~ ~ .~ c a ~ e: " ;:E "0 .0 'j o M bC .0 .2. cC OJ ~ -5 " '" M o U " " .= "5 "0 "" " 0 ro .t:: " 2 0: o "0 '" E M <8 M " "" .0 2. .0 .2. .0 .2. ~ ~ .:!, bC " ] ;: '" U M " "" W N a 0 o 0 J:: E .s -5 ;; 0 2 2 2 ~ 8' ..c; ~ ~ 0 ~ l o M ~ 8 ~ o C M 0: <l> C .0 0 5 '! 2 ~ .s -B .5 .5 ~ .0 .2. B ~ '0;; :>, "OJ " " .sEs ~ "0 " " ~ .] '" ~ " ;:; o c :r: u M tD ..:2 ~ a '"-> 03 u ~ .- -5 '0;; ] " . 'E ~ '" " .., o "0 .2 gf ~ OJ ] ~ -B EO ~ o ~ ~ :!, .9 :>, .D -c '" ~ " ~ u oS "d '" M ~ "" 2 E 8 ~ ~ M ~ ~ w w C ">::" S o u r.:. .s - 6 c C N :>, '" -0 o .., '" "" ~ .0 .2. _~"'.,.._'_..,~."v....,~__.__,..~~.~___ ......, .., '" ;: '" u .0 .2. ~ .0 o M o -c 1::.- Qj :B ~ g <11._ Qj ~-." c:: ::1.- _E::Ll oEo: ~o_ ",u 0 ~~b c . c ~"" ~ u " 0 ~~u -0 c _ ~ :B gf:! rl'Z 5 o:~o _Eu oEl'- ~8 Qj ~ ~u:; c ~ ~~~ &~- ~ ~ ~ :g ~ M5 O.S U ~ '5,..., -E~ ~ E 0 :28u ::Ll ~ 0: _ .s o o '<;j 0 0..' 0! o 0! <;j" (V) <;j" N o ,..., 0.J lD 00 (Y) en ~ Ln (V) \.0 ~ g r--- \.D N Vi o Lf) <:;J- <:;J- <;j" N o ,..., Vi (J) r----- 00 O'l N 0.J N N ~ ~ '" I:: (J) <;j" co N ;:!! r----.. Lf";. \.0 co U Ln (Y) r--- '<;j" ., o:?; 2l o r----.._ (V) o r-l r------ N~ ON"'" (Y) Lil ,..., (Y) r-l <;j" <;j" en r---. \.0_ t.q, Ol .-l r-l 0)- ~ :;; "" ~ ~ '" c. ~ "'" u ., or--- Lil 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ - c ~ ." .~ ~ 0: o ~ ~ ~ C1; Or--- 0 0 0.J ~f5~'~-~' :5 ~ R~~M~ en Ol. lor, 0 (J) r-1 Lil:n- '-D' {"I)- " c ~ &. (;j I:: ~ ..o.r:::. i5 ~ ('Q ~ ~ u U ~ (/) :> en 0 CD CD N m ~- fj' co N o '" "' co '" N '" "' ~ '" '" ai "' l'- N "' N N ai ~ ~ o '" "'. ~ "' .. ~ co '" '" "' co '" "_.c., ~ oi ~ c . u E' a g o S CD 0~ =0 " o 3 o co , , SHAVER & ASSOCIATES, LiD PUAIIC IANDl'Sf PlANNING AND IlfSIGN 6D CONTACT JEFF SCHDtNDAUER, SENIOR PRINCIPAL 95??H,0831 fXT 13 . OPEN SPACE DESIGN/CONSERVATION DEVELOPMENT MODEL Key Objective: Win-win-win outcomes for the lGU, developers, and regulatory agencies. resulting in developments that have enduring value and preserve the local sense of place and landscape character: Community Vi.ion And Value. Mu5t Be Clearly Defined And U.ed A5 the Ba.i. For The.e Plan. Porks, natural opcn spoces/grccnwoys and trails arc uscd os the primary underpinning for developing the Comprehensive Plan and rclated Growth Managemcnt Policies. . REGULATORY AND GROWTH CONTROL ApPROACH Value: . Creates baseline requirements for development . Ensures that any given development will achieve minimum public values in alignment with local regulatory authority . Sets strict controls on the rate or pace of development Challenges: . Strips out creativity due to highly scripted requirements . Imposes development risk and cost factors that have no public or private value, but still have to be accounted for in the development's economic pro forma . Regulatory requirements limit developer's incentive to provide any public value beyond the minimum Results: . Developments that meet minimal regulatory requirements . True vision of the community often not realized . Developments take on a "cookie-cutter" appearance . '* Note that public values can go beyond natural resource based values. Examples include affordable housing, various forms of housing, architectural standards, and improvements to community infrastructure, to name a few. Key Strategy: Leverage LGU's regulatory capacity (as defined by traditional development track) to entice developers into a collaborative process that results in higher public values within the context of the economic viability and marketability of the development. HEART OF THE MATTER LIES HERE! The greatest utility of the traditional development track is to establish the ground rules for development and then use them to enticc developers into a more collaborative approach that holds greater promise for win-win-win outcomesJ COLLABORATIVE AND PUBLIC VALUES-DRIVEN APPROACH Value: . Allows for more creativity in development planning . Based on development principles that define specific public values being sought consistent with the community's vision Challenges: . Requires a high degree of trust among players . Requires the city to think non-traditionally about managing development . Requires more flexibility and give and take on city side Results: . More creative development solutions offering higher public values . Greater realization of public vision without compromising the economic viability of the development Common Park, Natural Resource/Open Space, and Trail Values- Being Sought: . Preserving natural open spaces and greenways . Preserving or enhancing the quality of local ecological systems . Establishing a privately-funded endowment program for long-term natural resources stewardship. . Managing storrnwater!improving water quality through natural infiltration techniques . Providing public pari< and trail opportunities consistent with local and regional plans . Preserving the overall aesthetic quality of the area COPYR I GHT 2005 BY R RAUf R ~ A SS DC IATES. lTD. _ ALL RIGHTS RESfRVf 0 DPHJ SPACE DESIGN/CONSERVATION D[VElOPMErn PLANNING -1- . >t"A' "'Wf'>''''> <" ~. "- t!:l! ',';:i,''? f/V'\ Future water lovers will thank you. -"~ Introducing our Planning & Preservation Fund Ute !lCrln;UWll('(",f tilt' [Iliri;l~i\(' l'; ":,i'b,irlll. Till' PO\H'[".f ynllr ':Cl!i', [Jl\(,_,t ill i,\,'; bk\'~. rinT';, ::1>1 r()IIIlIIlI;llfIV" 1(1)' I'mm' ~'l'tWl:l!j"n-;. (:'>lH:KI elm ,It: i1i,' ):.!-'I'~\j 1.1r,-ILL:-., ,I:;'.! INITIATIVE FOUNDATION INmATIVE QUARTERLY ECONOMICS Depth Charges SE BY BRENDA MAAS New Research Places Price Tag on Water Quality magine searching for lakeshore prop- erty. A real estate agent takes you to two sites of equal iakeshare footage and price, The structures are identical on each site, bUlthey are on dIfferent lakes, SIte A has la..vn to the water's edge, a fIeldstone retaining wall, and an artifIcial beach, The water is green and murky. The SIte B property has as much "wild" space as well-kept lawn, mcluding the lakefronl. There are birds, squirrels, even a star- tled deer A heron takes off, \vhile the loons give a warn- ing, collect their young, and dive away. On the dock, you look down to see sunfIsh and blue gills among the aquatic plants; minnO\vs zigzag around; dragonflies hover looking across the lake and down the shore, you see similar scenes~native vegetation playing peek- a-boo "oth buildings so the lake, not the homes, remains the centerpiece. WhIch property would you buy' A recent study by Bemidji State University may help your decision. Retrofitting a study originally completed on lakes in Maine, researchers exam- ined thirty-seven lakes in the eight-county Mississippi Headwaters Board region and con- cluded that lake water clarity affects lake prop- erty prices, The study provides hard facts for a "direct and dramatic link bet\veen good stew- ardship practices' and property owners' pocket- books, according Hickman of the Initiative FoundatIOn's Healthy lakes and Rivers PartnershIp (HlRP) program Source: Bemidji State Uni....ersity study. Through HlRP grants and training, near- ly 1,200 citizen volunteers have created water management plans for 150 ~!innesota lakes and rivers, "Presmong water qualIty is always the number-one goal," adds Hickman, "We primari- ly work "ith shoreland property owners who have the most impact on the lake as well as the most to gain and the most to lose," The BemidJi State research team calculated how property pnces would change if water clar- Ity decreased by one meter Brainerd's Gull lake, for example, would decrease nearly $53 per frontage foot for a total change of more than $8,8 million across the entire lakefront By improving water quality, Gulls property prices could increase more than $39 per frontage foot for a lake-wide total of more than $6j million, Considering a lakehome as an asset, that's a seri- ous capital investment to protect. Looking beyond property values, water qualIty slIould be considered an mvaluable eco- . nomic asset [or the community. Dr. Harold Dziuk, of the Itasca Coalition of Lake Associations, examined the economic contribu- tion of ten lakes in the Turtle Lake Watershed in ltasca County He notes that property taxes on these lakes contributed less than 7 percent of the total annual mcome ($4,975,831) generat- ed. He attribntes the remaining 93 percent to consumer purchases by residents, their guests, and tourists buying items and services. If this is the impact of only ten lakes, what about thousands of others throughout the state' It is often said that time equals money The same is true for personal investments in lake water quality Preventative measures are one- tenth the cost of restoration projects, according to Hickman. "It's certainly in our interest to pre- eerve our water qualit)~" he says, and points to the HLRP program and the Minnesota DNRs "Top Ten" (see page 24) as ways for property mvners to invest their mVTl sweat equity. Garry Johanson, residential property developer "ith :.iaterra Land, has been involved "ith local and state policies for nearly twenty years. Many chents research a lake, especially its water quality, before even investigating the property itself. They want assurance that thm investment will appreciate. "If the lake turns green, who wants to live there'" asks Johanson. He provides clients "ith copies of local ordi- nances and lauds local, regional, and state rules, such as setbacks and septic compliance, initiat- ed to retain the value in Minnesota's lakes. Kenzie Phelps, president of the Briggs Lake Cbain Association believes that many Minnesotans care deeply aboUl theIr lake legacy but are unsure of the next step. "There's a criti- cal mass beginning to say Things aren't going the way we want them to. Maybe we should look at what's happening, pay more attention to water quality and not take our lake and water quality for granted,'" notes Phelps. "Theres a ,If-interest here and theres economics." Indeed. There is a price tag on Minnesotas _mious lakeside lifestyle-and It's time to put the money where the lake is. If;! '5E. Families are part of our electric co-op. Only your local electric co-op makes every customer an owner of the business. Unlike other electric utilities, your co-op exists to make sure your needs are always met, not to make a ptofit. And since every electric co-op is locally owned and operated, your co-op is always there with you, teinvesting in your communiry. That's why in an electric co-op, the people have the power. C,*W19U sgs !. ~~t~~ (0 ~ TOOlJ-\V,~PcNA ~J;~ ~.?; Your Touchstone Energy" Cooperaci ves FALL 2006 . . . &' ( tf . t\~' : ~~~~~ -P~1I- A Collaborative Approach to Development and Environmental Stewardship Most developments use a mathematic, geometric design formula: Jeff Smyser, Ale? Ciry Planner, City of Uno Lakes determine minimum lot size determine minimum ROW width calculate number of lots needed lor an economically viable project draw the lots and roads to meet the minimums grade 1h.8,site, fill wetlands, clear vegetation to meet lhese mlnlmums Jason Husveth, MS Critical Connections Ecological Services, Inc. the 'open space" is what's left over, dribbled around like a peslo sauce around !he edges of the plate [fhe presenlation is nice on a colored rendilion, but does it make the development any better once people are living there?) Traditional Development The only open space left is stormwater ponds or formal parks and trails, which means ongoing maintenance by . Process is developer driven: they submit application, city reviews it against the regulations . Design is regulation driven: zoning public works department parks department The design is mathematical. The process is mechanical. The process typically is adversarial. These are all public dollars. Mother Nature does not design using mathematical minimums, so the manmade environment screws up the natural resources. ...recreation fields... Open space should be more than... 6f 1 . . . ...and formal parks; ...and passive uses. Minnesota Land Cover Classification System - MLCCS Maps Land Cover Types - Natural - Semi-Naluraf - Culturat 5 Level System 200+ Land Cover Types Identified open space is also areas for nature... ~. IT't. Of IINOI KES Handbook for EnvironmerllalPlanning and Conservalion Development -- _.M-<O"""'_'........_.~"< P2rks,.~_lltu_T1l,I:;qpeii-._~pi/ci/ Greenw}aysaD~-T.r.ai'i-. ,. Systen{Pbri 2 . . . Create borderless park & greenway system,taced logetherwilh high value lrails. Establish a vision for natural resources stewardship and provide a lrameworkfor restoring and rnanagingthe resources. -~.,...-"'<....~~-,-,- ,,~ !..~~~~~~~~~:~+- ~~~~- ~ Growth Management Policy: conservation development public values allow exemptions to growth limits Preserving more natural open space than required under current ordinances and development policies Reducing the extent of impervious surfaces and size of the development footprint Restoring lenhancing ecological systems on the site as part of the development process Protecting off-site ecological systems through increased buffering ',~' J - ~ :,,,-;,~,,.,-,-;"";". 1j " -~ ~ 'I ~j """'~"""'_'~'m_ '::-:='1 11'~'"-1-.~ , . ... ~$ __...J __"~ '- '-- " .-::::::'.:;;::;:::" _t:::<_. -I'"I.G~.".'" ~!3! .. I.', ". ""~3_().o..t.~'!uiIL['Mm"""'''' The Parks/Open Space Plan recognizes that the City does not have the financial resources to do what is needed to achieve these goals. We need to collaborate with developers to get things done. Ensuring long-term natural resource stewardship through an endowment program sponsored by the Developer Providing public park and trail opportunities consistent with or in excess of the System Plan Managing stormwater (flow rates and quality) using natural infiltration and ecologically-based approaches Preserving the open space aesthetic to which community residences have become accustomed Maintaining natural buffer between established and new developments Hey, wait a minute-- haven't we seen this somewhere before? 3 . "-;:' r--:z_= 1])';- ">cY;,.c.'iilfYr~. . it )J;1r::; ~ k ~ I ;? , f\. 1 I ' . I \ . ,~ I wL" .. \.~ 11,,,,,, >=-='1 . ._-~ .....----. ff";'~-----_____ ~C-~-.. -_' 'D....;~..,-_c_.. 0". ..r:?"'"'l ~'~ . ...... I-I if!!;j;;{:~,~--.+ iJ.7t ~",--..~ Q \) ~-~. Jj ! \~"'- ./ .~ \ '-I~-'/" '. !\ \ ' - . - '--1 'l-:-________~~=J RanctalJArondl's approadl mrONE,,..,,r.... 14-;,r..l~'1'C<ww,""""""''''' Trpbll7~O_<<l""'"'rloc>l<oo...~.tp<<Qlr.""".,"""""""'. 'IgrJlcuo:""'TlI'".ptoptn)'>>Iuo>lld....;~"""=r,,..Of'I<j.- "1'""'."""""'....,.....""-~.TlI''''''t..butfill~.. ,tc~-.:lby_"':hi<""'P'<~'_n'Ppro<..~ Randal/Arendt's approach 5TB'ONtP"""", 1<."'IIfl"IPrmuyu.........""";o.,...:, . 4 Randa!1 Arerldrs ] STEP ONE. Parr Th",.~ approacll P,,'emi.1 Dt'lelop",,,,,,^,,,,,, --ro'Optlon,I,2.,ndS RiwdaHAreflO/'S lapproac~ 5HPTWO loC'.t1~lHou,.5I<.. . STEP THREE MgoJf>l:5"-'''''.ndT...;1:r ~dal}Are~~ STEP.FQUJ\. I ~;~~cad1 ~ D""Wln~ In dl.lo<Un.. . . . Most people think of conservation development for rural areas. But why can't we conserve valued natural features and open space in denser urban/suburban development? . Lot size minimums are pretty much arbitrary numbers. Why is 12,000 sf better than 10,800 sf, or 7,000 sf? . Even the 60' right of way and 32' pavement width should be questioned. Do you really need all that for every street? Why not "urban clustering"? . People fear density increase with smaller lots. official Plagiarism in Planning statement: But, if the density doesn't change and you have more open space, isn't that better? Our process is patterned after what we learned from the City of Minnetonka's conservation development projects, created under the guidance of Jeff Schoenbauer of Brauer & Associates, who also prepared our Parks/Open Space plan, and who is helping us on projects. Our process turns the normal development process upside down in many ways. How it works: . Developer contacts us This can be difficult for many developers, surveyors, planners, engineers, who have standardized their processes. We say "come talk to us: do not spend money on a layout yet" It's not just wetland fill/mitigation and tree replacement plans. . It's about collaboration 5 . . . " We meet with developer and discuss: -the Parks and Open Space Plan -our conservation development process -what we know about natural features: from our MLCCS andlor other info -site-specific information needs . The developer is responsible for hiring an ecological professional who can prepare the site specific inventory: rare plants, habitat, hydrology (Jason will explain more of this.) . Once the inventory is prepared, we get a copy of it and determine what is of public value and should be preserved. . It's now up to developer to start designing the site, along with the ecologist's input " We work with the developer to arrange development in between and around the valued natural features. . Must ensure that the project will be economically successful: -Developer creates a "yield plan" showing how the site could develop under standard zOrlirlg requirements. -This gives a site derlsity basis. . Now we meet with developer's team and discuss natural resources irlventory. That is, the City takes the lead irl the first part of site desigrl: Just what rlatural resources are Orl the site? What's out there that we value? Or, maybe create features not there now, restore natural features or functions that have been altered by human activity: - remove tiles draining wetfands to restore wetland hydrology - daylight tiled county "ditches" - transplant select vegetation to areas better suited and permanently preserved 6 . . . . Must ensure that the project will be economically successful: - Give stormwater fee credit for infiltration and other natural stormwater management design - Give park dedication fee credit for trails, other recreational amenities Traditional Deve/ODment: ConservatJonDeveJooment: Developer designs, cilyreacts City lakes lha teadand defines public values, developeraccommodales Design based ondevelopmerll controls Design based on naluraJ resourCB inlormation Regulation driven Design is malhemalical Whatislheoostdesign? Process is mechanical Pra<;ess is;nteractive, reilerative Procasstypicallyisadvefsarial Process is collaborative Jason Husveth Critical Connections Ecological Services, Inc. . Once we have a good site design, the city planning staff becomes the advocate for the project. Not adversarial, collaborative: -pursuit the public values and -ensure a financially viable project Once you have the valued natural features, the open space areas set aside, preserved in an easement, what happens to them then? We answered the question "what resources are on the site?". But what is needed to preserve and manage the resources over time? 7 . . . Foxborough _...... 5<10 .,...".,....-., ".., ~...N'<>.....I"-'} r..""'''''''''f''''tr'''''-'''' ..".,....,"'... """ ""......."""""",'*, MIl .-...............~-- ....-~..,,_.............. ~........-...~- [""",,-C_F_J>>%w fm Dt~ 0<....<>""", UNature'sRelugElH Delailfrom Parks and Opens Space Plan GENERAL SITE AREA of Foxborough " .. .m - _olPoopo<tr"","""", .........~'- m "'~..-ol.......'_ .-..--......- --......-.......-. ..-.--'''- ...---......... ~"....~~ F""DtNO!'>"""""",," Manaae slormwater (flow rates aualilv) I orolect off-site ecoloalcal systems Natural inliltration syslems will be used 10 manage stormwater to the degree possible. Roadways narrowed in width to reduce extent of lmpervioussurface. Provide oublic oark and trail opportunities consistent with the Parks Plan The development layout successfully accommodates key park, open space, and trail components deflned under the System Plan. Preserve ooen soace aesthetic Through protected conservation easements, all of the remaining natural opens pace will retain ;ls natural aeslhelic qvaliHe$ on into perpetuity. Mainlain natural buffer between established and new develoomenls The conservation easement serves the duel purpose 01 providing a substantial buffer between existing developments to the west. Development Proposal- Open Space Comparison "'"<'""'\"'- -';:;;; 8 . . . Legal/administrative structure: Funding: Developer contributes escrow tund . City holds escrow & invests like public fund Homeowners association owns open space land City holds conservation easement over open space . Implementing management plan is responsibility of homeowners association City holds funds . City monitors work and approves annual work plan . Escrow generates annual earnings which are used exclusively for implementing management plan Funding (conL): Each homeowner pays annual amount as part of homeowner association fees, association forwards this to City to go into fund for implementation. . The annual fee increases over time to match inflation. Optimal: do as much restoration work as possible up front, as part of initial site work This is the best investment of financial resources for restoration. Conditions of approval: to be done prior to final plat approval . management plan (with preliminary plat) . must submit conservation easement document (covenants and restriction) granting easement to city . documents must include specific things such as funding mechanism . must submit homeowners association documents to city for review . management plan y.....,....c....,,-....._.....,.., ..._......"'._,,_..,-_....~.. .............- I~.,.,;, k ~/ ~"'d !r~=_ 8G'0JI<;:;'!~ l. ._.--------.l 9 . . conservation easement and Homeowners Association Documents: homeowners documents should refer to the management plan 8.2 Payment of Assessments. Annual Assessments shall be due and . funding mechanism must be spelled payable... . The Annual Assessments out, including homeowner include a $100.00 per lot assessment to requirement to pay annual support the Foxborough Stewardship homeowner fee Fund, ... Homeowners Association Documents: Homeowners Association Documents: 12.8 Enforcement by City. The City may 11.1 Dissolution. The Association shall be . enforce the Conservation Easement dissolved only in accordance with Covenants and Restrictions (CECR) applicable law. The Association shall not and all provision in this Declaration dissolve without the-wJ'men consent OT me Cjj;J sf L;, ,u LaKes. I he Clfy shall be - relating to the CECR and Conservation ~ Area, including, without limitation, the nOlITlea or any meeting of the Association Stewardship Fund assessments... or its members at which dissolution of the Association shall be considered. Create a plan based on the resources you Communicate the needs to city attorney want to preserve, enhance, or create. Adopt the plan with a commitment to Ensure the documents address implement it. management plan funding Work with the developers: this means a homeowner association responsibilities lot of communication and understanding of city rights to enforce everyone's needs. . 10 . . . St. Paul Pioneer Press (MN) March 27,2006 St. Paul Edition, Local Section, Page B 1 A GREEN DEVELOPMENT Surrounded by wetlands and woods, Foxborough in Lino Lakes is just one ofthe environmentally friendly housing projects connecting suburbanites and nature. By Bob Shaw, Pioneer Press Mike Black isn't sure where nature begins and his back yards end. "1 think it's right there, but I don't know," Black said, pointing across a future lawn into a thicket of ash trees. But this confusion is exactly the point of his housing development -- blurring the line between people and nature. The development, Foxborough in Lino Lakes, is one of the environmentally friendly housing projects popping up across the metro area. These new "conservation developments" blend nature into residential areas. Some environmentalists are cheering. "This trend is showing that we can have our cake and eat it, too," said Harland Hiemstra, spokesman for the state Department of Natural Resources. He said the green-housing trend is more than building individual homes to save energy or water. It is planning neighborhoods around natural areas that the homeowners maintain as if they were private parks. The projects minimize the No.1 pollution problem from housing: rainwater that soaks up contaminants from roads and lawns and then pours into rivers and lakes. Hiemstra said the encouraging trend could help the metro area house the million-plus people expected to move here in the next 25 years while maintaining or even improving the environment. The projects also get qualified approval from the Sierra Club. "When developers start fighting about who is greener, that is a positive sign that the market is responding," said Frank Jossi, spokesman for the Sierra Club's North Star chapter. His one objection is that the conservation developments are usually in far-flung exurban areas, where large, unspoiled tracts of land are available. Any growth in the exurbs contributes to sprawl, congestion and pollution from vehicles, he said. But he noted the tree-hugger tracts do reduce the impact on land and water. Officials say there are now more than 20 conservation developments in Minnesota. There are about lOin the metro area in various stages of development, ranging from Wild Meadows in Medina to Tapestry in Lake Elmo to two others planned for Lino Lakes. Interest in green building is soaring, according to Remi Stone, public policy director for the Builders Association of tbe Twin Cities. Stone's group started tbe nonprofit Green Building Initiative last fall to encourage environmentally sound home construction. She said developers are responding to interest by cities and are eager to reflect interest by the home-buying public. "Weare not out to lunch. We are out to do the l'ight tbing," Stone said. sty . The state's first conservation development was Fields of St. Croix in Lake Elmo. It was built in the mid-1990s by a man Stone calls the "godfather" of conservation development n Bob Engstrom, owner of the Robert Engstrom Coso "That is our niche," Engstrom said. In that 240-acre site, homeowners share a common area maintained through a fund to which they contribute. The Minnesota Land Trust monitors the natural areas. After the success of Fields ofSt. Croix, a handful of others followed. But in the past year, Stone said, interest has exploded, in part because of a spirit of cooperation among city officials, developers and environmentalists. Increasingly, said Hiemstra, cities are realizing they can compromise with developers for a better environmental outcome. For example, many city rules boost run-off pollution -- such as requirements for large, lawn-covered lots, long driveways and wide streets. Hiemstra said officials are realizing that bending those rules can help the environment and give developers unique, attractive projects. "It has to be win-win," said Jeff Schoenbauer, an environmental consultant with Brauer & Associates who helped negotiate the deal to create Foxborough. He said, however, that the green-neighborhood movement is hurt by a lack of consistent rules. Each of the nearly 200 cities in the metro area has its own approach to environmental preservation, he said, and the result is scattershot. "We need a best-practices manual," Schoenbauer said. "It's just too much reinventing the wheel each time." The story of Foxborough is typical-- a development stalied by a loophole. Uno Lakes \vil1 permit only 147 new houses a year but allows more if developers abide by strict environmental rules. Schoenbauer said this provision piqued the interest of developers. "Uno Lakes is in the lead," Schoenbauer said. The city took charge by asking developers for environmentally friendly ideas, not passively waiting for developers to build what they liked. "It puts the city in a more advantageous position. They can batier," he said. At Foxborough, the batiering included an agreement to fill in wetlands that would have blocked a road and, in exchange, to create larger wetlands elsewhere on the site. The city's willingness to bargain attracted Black, the development manager of Royal Oaks Realty Co. of Shore view. As he drove through the area last week, the site looked like a Minnesota bayou, with 24 ponds and wetlands surrounding 57 home sites. Groves of ash trees, a boardwalk over wetlands and an oak savannah surrounded the four houses under construction. Black expects homes in the development to sell for $600,000 or more. The area is designed to minimize runoff pollution. About half the land has been left in its natural state, so rainwater seeps directly into the groundwater. The city allowed Black to build narrow, 30-foot-wide streets. This minimizes runoff and saves money -- both in street installation and maintenance. And the lawns are smaller. Each home has a back yard with a roughly 25-foot- wide strip that is pat1 of the natural easement area. . . "The useable area is not that much," Black said. "If you want to throw a football in the back yard, this might not be for you," he said. Instead, homebuyers get natural views of oak groves or wetlands from their back deck! "People just love it," Black said. Black said a fund to maintain the natural areas has been established with $100,000. Homeowners will add $200 per year apiece to the fund. At the end of his tour through the thickly wooded area, Black passed through a conventional Uno Lakes suburb, which looked bare and ordinary in . . . contrast. "Look at this," he said, waving to a street scene that could be taken from almost any suburb in the country. "No trees at all. And look at these big, wide streets." Bob Shaw can be reached at bshaw@pioneerpress.com or 651-228-5433. The Fields o/St. Croix, a Lake Elmo housing development built in the mid-1990s around a Civil War-era barn, was the state's first conservation develapment. Now, there are about 10 such environmentally friendly housing developments in the Twin Cities and 20 in Minnesota. Copyright 2006 Saint Paul Pioneer Press; Record Number: 0603270047 . St. Paul Pioneer Press (1'v!N) May 26, 2006 DEVELOPER WARMED TO GREEN IDEA Nature's Refuge project continues city's Earth-friendly trend By Bob Shaw, Pioneer Press John Peterson didn't set out to become the greenest developer in Lino Lakes. But city officials talked him into it. 'This is entirely new to us," said Peterson, who has agreed to build a 240-acre project called Nature's Refuge, which meets environmental standards that are tougher than city requirements. The development continues Lino Lakes' effort to encourage housing that doesn't hurt the environment. The city already hosts the Foxborough "conservation development" - a designation for projects that are especially Earth-friendly. Nature's Refuge will be the second one, about five times Foxborough's size and incorporating many of the same features, city officials say. Under city rules, developers can exceed Lino Lakes' cap on new housing construction if they agree to celiain criteria. The developers of Foxborough, for example, set aside far more natural space than would ordinarily be required. "We made the decision to try to move development down this path," said community development director Mike Grochala. . The Nature's Refuge parcel, laced with wetlands and woodlands, held special interest for city officials. But the developers never thought about going green until city officials approached them last year. "The usual process is that you go in, dig a hole and build a house," said Peterson's paliner, Rick Carlson. But not here. On this site, more than half the land will be untouched, and the neighborhood will be built to conserve land and water. "We think this is the right thing to do," said Peterson, president of Oakwood Land Development. Following the city rules, the 240-acre site would be expected to have about 330 houses. But the developers will set aside more open space and build only 278 homes. At a metro-average rate of about $100,000 a lot, the loss to the developer would be more than $5 million. So why do it? "I have asked myself that," said Carlson, president of the development company Richard S. Carlson and Associates. "Normally, you go into a community and you can take heat for a year and a half. In this case, there is a feeling of a team effort. I feel good about that." Peterson said he might make some of it up in higher lot prices. But still, going green will mean lower profits. "This is not about money," Peterson said. The biggest pollution problem from suburban projects is runoff from streets, driveways and rooftops. Nature's Refuge, like Foxborough, will have narrower streets and houses set closer to streets to shorten driveways. Almost al] back yards will blend into a common wilderness area. Work on the land might begin this fall, and houses are expected to range from the high $300,000s to about $700,000. . . Peterson gave credit for the project to city officials. "If we followed the squeeze-'em-in philosophy, there is no doubtthecitycould hold us to the building moratorium," Peterson said. "They should be proud. This idea originated with them." Bob Shaw can be reached at bshaw@pioneerpress.com or 651-228-5433. If you go: A public hearing on the Nature's Refuge development will be held at 6:30 p.m. May 31 in the Community Room at Lino Lakes City Hall, 600 Town Center Parkway. Scott McFetridge, Suburban team leader St. Paul Pioneer Press, 651-228-5447 . . . PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PROJECT POINTS SYSTEM AUTUMN RIDGE EVALUATION In order to qualify for the flexibility granted through PUD, projects must receive a minimum score of 75% of the applicable and attainable points for the development. These standards are in addition to the provisions of Chapter 20 of the Zoning Ordinance. Applicants must demonstrate that they have attempted to earn points in all applicable categories, and are encouraged to attain as many points as possible and not to merely clear the 75% threshold. A. Cateaorv: Open Space Preservation Open space is consolidated and usable Objective: To encourage all developers to have a unified open space plan that creates large areas of usable open space, accessible to residents of all units. . Percentage of Open Space: Open space can be achieved either by creating common open areas or by reserving specific amounts of open space on each lot other than a required yard (500 sq. ft. of usable open space per dwelling unit currently required). These open space requirements are in addition to any public park dedication required. At least 60% of the project area must be preserved for open space and all open space must be usable. Points are awarded for every 5% of additional open space permanently preserved, as follows: 65%-69.9% usable open space ' 70%-74.9% usable open space 75%-79.9% usable open space 80% usable open space or more 20 points maximum .open space areas reserved for storm water ponding may account for up to 10% of the usable open space if the ponding area serves as an amenity to the development (i.e. native plantings, trails, etc.). o points 5 points 10 points 15 points 20 points Contiguous Open Space: Open Spaces are connected with green corridors to reduce the occurrence of small or isolated open space areas. Points will be awarded for linking open space areas with natural corridors. A flat 10 points will be awarded for utilizing this technique. . 10 points maximum 10 points . B. Cateaorv: Pedestrian Qualitv The convenience of pedestrian movement through a neighborhood. . . . Objective: To locate all homes within a short walk to parks and open space and encourage pedestrian connections. Distance to parks and open space: Homes are located within a convenient distance to parks and open space. Points are awarded based on distance from units to a park, as measured along roadways or trails. Points are as follows: . % of units within a 500 foot walk to a park . % of units within a 1,000 foot walk from a park . 20 points maximum %/5 %/10 13.8 points (within 500 foot walk) 3.1 points (within a 1.000 foot walk 16.9 points Trail connections: Encouraging the creation of pedestrian trails or corridors within a neighborhood. Points will be awarded for the creation of trails that accommodate pedestrian and/or bicycle movement within a development. Points will only be awarded for trails provided in addition to required sidewalk. . 5 points per trail . 10 point maximum 5 points Public Access: Providing for access by the general public to trails, parks, or other recreational facilities. A flat 10 points will be awarded for providing convenient public access to trails, parks, and recreational facilities. . 10 point maximum 10 points C. Cateaory: Natural Resource Preservation Objective: To encourage the preservation of unique topographical features, trees, wetlands, and other natural features. Tree Preservation: Encouraging the preservation of trees located on a development site. A minimum of 70% total caliper inches must be preserved at the time of development. Bonus points will be awarded based on the percentage of . . . caliper inches preserved on top of the minimum requirement. Points are awarded as follows: . 40% of allowed removal preserved: . 45% of allowed removal preserved: . 50% of allowed removal preserved: . 55% of allowed removal preserved: . 60% or more preserved: 20 point maximum 5 points 10 points 15 points 20 points 20 points 'If less than 35% total caliper inches are preserved, negative points will be applied for this category. Information not available Natural Feature Preservation: To encourage the preservation of natural resources and minimize disruption of the surrounding environment. Qualifying sites will be reviewed on a case by case basis. A flat 10 points will be awarded for preserving natural features such as ravines, hilltops, oak savannahs, and other woodlands. . 10 point maximum Not applicable Natural Resource Restoration: To encourage developers to restore wetlands, wooded areas, and other natural resources, and remove invasive species. Points are awarded on a per acre basis. Two points will be awarded per acre of natural restoration work or invasive species removal. . 10 points maximum Information not available D. Cateaorv: Historic Preservation Objective: To encourage reusing existing buildings and structures or preserving specific site features which may be inventoried by the City, County, or State historical preservation office. Points will be awarded for each historic feature preserved. Five points will be awarded for small accessory structures, artifacts, and other small-scale historic elements. Ten points will be awarded for principal buildings and large accessory structures. Determination of point values will be evaluated on a case by case basis. . 10 points maximum Not applicable E. Cateaorv: Landscapina . . . Objective: To encourage extensive internal landscaping in excess of what is required by code. Points will be awarded based on % of landscaping units in excess of the minimum requirement for the underlying zoning district. . % of landscaping units/5= Point Value . 20 points maximum example: 100 units required, 120 units provided = 2 points o points- code landscaping F. Cateaorv: Architectural Elements The specific design elements of housing units that would be guaranteed by covenant. Objective: To encourage the production of homes with attractive architectural elements to add visual interest. Covenants shall be provided to ensure that architectural features for which points are sought will be built. Points will be awarded based on the percentage of units that will have a particular feature. Features and applicable points are as follows: Front Porches: To encourage the use of front porches. Porches are considered front porches only if they face a street or common open space. Points will be awarded at a rate of 1 point for every 10% of homes with a front porch. To qualify, porches must be a minimum of 5 feet deep and 7 feet wide. . 10 points maximum o points Garages: To encourage garages that are recessed from the front face of a home, or side loaded garages. Points will be awarded at a rate of 2 points for every 10% of detached units with a recessed garage or side-loaded garage. . 20 points maximum . Any garage not meeting this standard will result in negative points in this category. -20= all garage forward designs Building Materials: To encourage the use of brick, stone or other masonry construction as an accent or primary building material. Points will be awarded as follows: . · 1 point for every 10% of homes utilizing brick, stone, or masonry as an accent material on at least 35% of the front face of a unit. · 1 point for every 5% of homes utilizing brick, stone, or masonry as the primary building material. . 20 points maximum o points Building colors: To encourage building colors that are aesthetically pleasing and compatible with their surroundings. Points will be awarded based on visual interest of color palettes. A flat 10 points will be awarded when at least two colors are used on each wall with no color exceeding 70% of the total wall area. . 10 points maximum o points- all one color Roof Pitch: To add visual interest by encouraging steep roof pitches. 4112_______________ 'I"~ ::::~ 'I"/~~ 'i"/~~ 10/12/ ~ Points will be awarded based on the percentage of homes with roof pitches over 6/12. The point system is as follows: . · 7/12 2.5 points x % of homes · 8/12 5 points x % of homes · 9/12+ 10 points x % of homes 10 points maximum To be determined by building department Building Articulation: To encourage attached units that are articulated into smaller increments to add visual interest and variety by avoiding long, monotonous walls. . · Points will be awarded based on the combination of differences in walls, roofs, and architectural details. Five points for each of the following techniques, or a similar approach, on both front and rear walls. (To be eligible, a project must employ a technique on at least 75% of homes): o Stepping back of extending forward a portion of the fagade. 5 points o Use of multiple siding patterns, different textures or contrasting, but compatible, materials. o points o Window bays, gables, balconies, or similar ornamental features. 5 points- all units have decks Other architectural features: There are a great number of architectural features that are unique to specific styles that can be awarded points. They include, but are not limited to: · dormer balconies- 0 pOints · turrets- 0 points · cupolas- 0 points · decorative balustrades- 0 points · accent windows- 5 points · columns- 5 points · porticos- 0 points · pediments-O points . o Variations in rooflines to reinforce the articulation. 5 points · 20 points maximum *double points will be awarded for 4-sided architecture 15 total points Demonstrated variety of: · shingle styles- 0 points · symmetrical & proportional window placement- 5 points This category is broad to encourage the application of compatible architectural features. The application of architectural features simply to get points will not be rewarded. . Points will be awarded based on percentage of homes with each feature. · % of units / 20= Point Value · 5 points maximum for each feature · 30 points maximum for other architectural features 15 total points G. Cateaorv: Roadwav Imaae The visual image of the development from public streets. Objective: To enhance visual interest of developments from public streets. Attached units: Attached townhome units are located on the interior of the development to reduce the amount of such units visible from roadways. Points will be awarded based on the percentage of attached townhome units located on the interior of the development. · % of interior attached units/10 . 10 points maximum 7.3 points- 73% on the interior . Home's front: The front of each home faces the street to create a more attractive streetscape. Points will be awarded based on the percentage of homes that face the road. . . . · % of homes that face the road 110= Point Value · 10 points maximum 'Each rear-loaded home shall result In negative points in this category 10 paints Rear Lanes: To create a traditional streetscape by encouraging utilization of rear lanes for vehicular access for single family detached homes. Points will be awarded based on the percentage of homes that are accessed by rear lanes. Rear lanes will need to be approved and have adequate setbacks to allow for safe passage of vehicles and pedestrians, and to allow for snow removal. . % of single family detached homes accessed by rear lanes/5= Point Value . 20 points maximum o points H. Cateaory: Housina Diversity The variety and quality of housing types within a neighborhood Objective: To encourage a wide variety of housing styles within a development. Style: To encourage a wide variety of models andlor elevations within a development. Points will be awarded based on the number of housing styles provided. · (Number of styleslnumber of buildings) x 20 · 10 points maximum o points- one housing style Pattern: To encourage diversity in housing through the separation of like models. Points will be awarded for a pattern which assures that models will not be repeated within X lots of each other. Point values are as follows: 4 lots between the same model 5 lots between the same model 6 lots between the same model 7 or more lots between the same model 10 points maximum 2.5 points 5 points 7.5 points 10 points A developer must propose an arrangement that contains at least 2 lots between the same model. Points will be awarded in accordance with any number of additional number of lots between the same model. Staff will consider patterns of repetition on both sides of the street. o points, all same model . . . I. Cateaorv: Liahtina Objective: To encourage the use appropriately scaled ornamental street lighting. A flat 10 points will be awarded if pedestrian friendly, ornamental street lighting is used in a development. · 10 points maximum 10 points J. Cateaorv: Pattern Book Objective: To encourage the creation of a formal book containing specific details on the entire development with descriptions and drawings of units, landscaping, and other designs referencing each section of the points system. A flat 10 points will be awarded for the creation of a detailed pattern book. · 10 points maximum Not applicable K. Cateaorv: Intearation with adiacent uses Objective: To encourage projects that connect to adjacent properties and uses. A flat ten points will be awarded for a project demonstrates a conscious effort to link the neighborhood to public or semi-public uses (schools, parks, community facilities). · 10 points Not applicable A flat ten points will be awarded for projects that connect to existing developments, or provide an opportunity to link to future developments. · 10 points 10 points TOTAL BASE POINTS POSSIBLE: 350 Points not applicable: 80 Total points available: 270 POINTS EARNED: 89.2 PERCENTAGE: 33% . BONUS POINT CATEGORIES: A project may only receive bonus points on one of the following categories: A. Cateaorv: Senior Housina Objective: To reward developments that provide senior housing Points will be awarded on a per unit basis. . 1 point for every 2 units . 20 Points maximum o points B. Cateaorv: Redevelopment Objective: To reward projects that redevelop blighted areas. A flat twenty points will be awarded for any redevelopment project in a blighted area. Qualification of a blighted area will be determined by the City. . 20 points maximum . . . . . AGENDA MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday, November 6th 2006 6:00 PM Commissioners: Rod Dragsten, Lloyd Hilgart, William Spartz, Sandy Suchy, and Barry Voight Council Members: Mayor Clint Herbst, Wayne Mayer, Tom Perrault, Glen Posusta, and Brian Stumpf Staff: Jeff O'Neill, Angela Schumann, Gary Anderson, Ollie Koropchak, Kimberly Holien and Steve Grittman - NAC I. Call to order. 2. Approval ofthe minutes of the Planning Commission meetings of October 3rd, 2006. 3. Consideration of adding items to the agenda. 4. Citizen comments. 5. Consideration to review for discussion a draft framework for an amendment to the Monticello Zoning Ordinance for Planned Unit Developments. (JOINT WORKSHOP WITH MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL) 6. Adjourn. . PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PROJECT POINTS SYSTEM CARLISLE VILLAGE EVALUATION In order to qualify for the flexibility granted through PUD, projects must receive a minimum score of 75% of the applicable and attainable points for the development. These standards are in addition to the provisions of Chapter 20 of the Zoning Ordinance. Applicants must demonstrate that they have attempted to earn points in all applicable categories, and are encouraged to attain as many points as possible and not to merely clear the 75% threshold. A. Cateaorv: Open Space Preservation Open space is consolidated and usable Objective: To encourage all developers to have a unified open space plan that creates large areas of usable open space, accessible to residents of all units. . Percentage of Open Space: Open space can be achieved either by creating common open areas or by reserving specific amounts of open space on each lot other than a required yard (500 sq. ft. of usable open space per dwelling unit currently required). These open space requirements are in addition to any public park dedication required. At least 60% of the project area must be preserved for open space and all open space must be usable. Points are awarded for every 5% of additional open space permanently preserved. as follows: 65%-69.9% usable open space 70%-74.9% usable open space 75%-79.9% usable open space 80% usable open space or more 20 points maximum .open space areas reserved for storm water ponding may account for up to 10% of the usable open space if the ponding area serves as an amenity to the development (i.e. native plantings, trails, etc.). 45% usable open space o points 5 points 10 points 15 points 20 points Contiguous Open Space: Open Spaces are connected with green corridors to reduce the occurrence of small or isolated open space areas. Points will be awarded for linking open space areas with natural corridors. A flat 10 points will be awarded for utilizing this technique. . 10 points maximum o points . B. Cateaorv: Pedestrian Qualitv . . . The convenience of pedestrian movement through a neighborhood. Objective: To locate all homes within a short walk to parks and open space and encourage pedestrian connections. Distance to parks and open space: Homes are located within a convenient distance to parks and open space. Points are awarded based on distance from units to a park, as measured along roadways or trails. Points are as follows: . % of units within a 500 foot walk to a park . % of units within a 1,000 foot walk from a park . 20 points maximum 100% within a 500 foot walk 20 points %/5 %/10 Trail connections: Encouraging the creation of pedestrian trails or corridors within a neighborhood. Points will be awarded for the creation of trails that accommodate pedestrian and/or bicycle movement within a development. Points will only be awarded for trails provided in addition to required sidewalk. . 5 points per trail . 10 point maximum 10 points Public Access: Providing for access by the general public to trails, parks, or other recreational facilities. A flat 10 points will be awarded for providing convenient public access to trails, parks, and recreational facilities. . 10 point maximum 10 points C. Cateaorv: Natural Resource Preservation Objective: To encourage the preservation of unique topographical features, trees, wetlands, and other natural features. Tree Preservation: Encouraging the preservation of trees located on a development site. A minimum of 70% total caliper inches must be preserved at the time of development. Bonus points will be awarded based on the percentage of . caliper inches preserved on top of the minimum requirement. Points are awarded as follows: . 40% of allowed removal preserved: . 45% of allowed removal preserved: . 50% of allowed removal preserved: . 55% of allowed removal preserved: . 60% or more preserved: 20 point maximum 5 points 10 points 15 points 20 points 20 points 'If less than 35% total caliper inches are preserved, negative points will be applied for this category. 49.4% preserved -10 points Natural Feature Preservation: To encourage the preservation of natural resources and minimize disruption of the surrounding environment. Qualifying sites will be reviewed on a case by case basis. A flat 10 points will be awarded for preserving natural features such as ravines, hilltops, oak savannahs, and other woodlands. . 10 point maximum . Not Applicable Natural Resource Restoration: To encourage developers to restore wetlands, wooded areas, and other natural resources, and remove invasive species. Points are awarded on a per acre basis. Two points will be awarded per acre of natural restoration work or invasive species removal. . 10 points maximum Tree Restoration required by the City, not eligible for points. D. Category: Historic Preservation Objective: To encourage reusing existing buildings and structures or preserving specific site features which may be inventoried by the City, County, or State historical preservation office. Points will be awarded for each historic feature preserved. Five points will be awarded for small accessory structures, artifacts, and other small-scale historic elements. Ten points will be awarded for principal buildings and large accessory structures. Determination of point values will be evaluated on a case by case basis. . 10 points maximum . Not applicable . E. Cateaory: Landscapina Objective: To encourage extensive internal landscaping in excess of what is required by code. Points will be awarded based on % of landscaping units in excess of the minimum requirement for the underlying zoning district. . % of landscaping units/5= Point Value . 20 points maximum 17.2 points- 86% in excess of requirement F. Cateaory: Architectural Elements The specific design elements of housing units that would be guaranteed by covenant. Objective: To encourage the production of homes with attractive architectural elements that add visual interest. Covenants shall be provided to ensure that architectural features for which points are sought will be built. Points will be awarded based on the percentage of units that will have a . particular feature. Features and applicable points are as follows: Front Porches: To encourage the use of front porches. Porches are considered front porches only if they face a street or common open space. Points will be awarded at a rate of 1 point for every 10% of homes with a front porch. To qualify, porches must be a minimurn of 5 feet deep and 7 feet wide. . 10 points maximum 5.7 points- 31/54 homes have front porches Garages: To encourage garages that are recessed from the front face of a home, or side loaded garages. Points will be awarded at a rate of 2 points for every 10% of detached units with a recessed garage or side-loaded garage. . 20 points maximum . Any garage not meeting this standard will result in negative points in this category. 11.8 points- 32 homes with recessed or side-loaded garages -8.2 ooints- 22 homes with aaraae forward desians 3.6 points . . Building Materials: To encourage the use of brick, stone or other masonry construction as an accent or primary building material. Points will be awarded as follows: . 1 point for every 10% of homes utilizing brick, stone, or masonry as an accent material on at least 35% of the front face of a unit. . 1 point for every 5% of homes utilizing brick, stone, or masonry as the primary building material. . 20 points maximum 4 points- 21 homes with 35% brick or more Building colors: To encourage building colors that are aesthetically pleasing and compatible with their surroundings. Points will be awarded based on visual interest of color palettes. A flat 10 points will be awarded when at least two colors are used on each wall with no color exceeding 70% of the total wall area. . 10 points maximum o points- Rear walls of all homes comprised of one color Roof Pitch: To add visual interest by encouraging steep roof pitches. 4112~ '/12~ ::~ ::::~ '0/12/ '" . Points will be awarded based on the percentage of homes with roof pitches over 6/12. The point system is as follows: . 7/12 2.5 points x % of homes . 8/12 5 points x % of homes . 9/12+ 10 points x % of homes 10 points maximum Not available, to be reviewed by building department Building Articulation: To encourage attached units that are articulated into smaller increments to add visual interest and variety by avoiding long, monotonous walls. . . Points will be awarded based on the combination of differences in walls, roofs, and architectural details. Five points for each of the following techniques, or a similar approach, on both front and rear walls (To be eligible, a project must employ a technique on at least 75% of homes): o Stepping back of extending forward a portion of the fa<;:ade. 5 points- 100% of homes o Use of multiple siding patterns, different textures or contrasting, but compatible, materials. Other architectural features: There are a great number of architectural features that are unique to specific styles that can be awarded points. They include, but are not limited to: · dormers- 1.3 pOints . turrets- 0 points · cupolas- 0 points · decorative balustrades- 2.85 points · accent windows- 5 points · columns- 3.6 points . porticos-.2 points · pediments- 0 points . 5 points- 94% of homes o Window bays, gables, balconies, or similar ornamental features. 5 points- 100% of homes o Variations in rooflines to reinforce the articulation. 5 points- 100% of homes . 20 points maximum *double points will be awarded for 4-sided architecture 20 points . Demonstrated variety of: · shingle styles- 5 points · symmetrical & proportional window placement- 5 points This category is broad to encourage the application of compatible architectural features. The application of architectural features simply to get points will not be rewarded. Points will be awarded based on percentage of homes with each feature. · % of units / 20= Point Value · 5 points maximum for each feature · 30 points maximum for other architectural features 22.5 total points G. Cateaorv: Roadwav Imaae The visual image of the development from public streets. Objective: To enhance visual interest of developments from public streets. Attached units: Attached town home units are located on the interior of the development to reduce the amount of such units visible from roadways. . Points will be awarded based on the percentage of attached town home units located on the interior of the development. · % of interior attached units/10 . 10 points maximum 6 points . . . Home's front: The front of each home faces the street to create a more attractive streetscape. Points will be awarded based on the percentage of homes that face the road. · % of homes that face the road /10= Point Value . 10 points maximum *Each rear-loaded home shall result in negative points in this category 10 points Rear Lanes: To create a traditional streetscape by encouraging utilization of rear lanes for vehicular access for single family detached homes. Points will be awarded based on the percentage of homes that are accessed by rear lanes. Rear lanes will need to be approved and have adequate setbacks to allow for safe passage of vehicles and pedestrians, and to allow for snow removal. . % of single family detached homes accessed by rear lanes/5= Point Value . 20 points maximum o points H. Cateaorv: Housina Diversity The variety and quality of housing types within a neighborhood Objective: To encourage a wide variety of housing styles within a development. Style: To encourage a wide variety of models and/or elevations within a development. Points will be awarded based on the number of housing styles provided. · (Number of styles/number of buildings) x 20 . 10 points maximum 10 points Pattern: To encourage diversity in housing through the separation of like models. Points will be awarded for a pattern which assures that models will not be repeated within X lots of each other. Point values are as follows: 4 lots between the same model 5 lots between the same model 6 lots between the same model 7 or more lots between the same model 10 points maximum 2.5 points 5 points 7.5 points 10 points . . . A developer must propose an arrangement that contains at least 2 lots between the same model. Points will be awarded in accordance with any number of additional number of lots between the same model. Staff will consider patterns of repetition on both sides of the street. o points- locations where same models are directly across from each other. I. Cateaorv: Liahtina Objective: To encourage the use appropriately scaled ornamental street lighting. A flat 10 points will be awarded if pedestrian friendly, ornamental street lighting is used in a development. . 10 points maximum 10 points J. Cateaorv: Pattern Book Objective: To encourage the creation of a formal book containing specific details on the entire development with descriptions and drawings of units, landscaping, and other designs referencing each section of the points system. A flat 10 points will be awarded for the creation of a detailed pattern book. . 10 points maximum Not applicable K. Cateaorv: Intearation with adiacent uses Objective: To encourage projects that connect to adjacent properties and uses. A flat ten points will be awarded for a project demonstrates a conscious effort to link the neighborhood to public or semi-public uses (schools, parks, community facilities). . 10 points Not applicable A flat ten points will be awarded for projects that connect to existing developments, or provide an opportunity to link to future developments. . 10 points 10 points . . . TOTAL BASE POINTS POSSIBLE: 350 Points not applicable: 50 Total points available for project: 300 POINTS EARNED: 157 PERCENTAGE: 52% BONUS POINT CATEGORIES: A project may only receive bonus points on one of the following categories: A. Cateaorv: Senior Housina Objective: To reward developments that provide senior housing Points will be awarded on a per unit basis. . 1 point for every 2 units . 20 Points maximum o points B. Cateaorv: Redevelopment Objective: To reward projects that redevelop blighted areas. A flat twenty points will be awarded for any redevelopment project in a blighted area. Qualification of a blighted area will be determined by the City. . 20 points maximum o points . . . HILLSIDE FARM PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT EVALUATION In order to qualify for the flexibility granted through PUD, projects must receive a minimum score of 75% of the applicable and attainable points for the development. These standards are in addition to the provisions of Chapter 20 of the Zoning Ordinance. Applicants must demonstrate that they have attempted to earn points in all applicable categories, and are encouraged to attain as many points as possible and not to merely clear the 75% threshold. A. Category: Open Space Preservation Open space is consolidated and usable Objective: To encourage all developers to have a unified open space plan that creates large areas of usable open space, accessible to residents of all units. Percentage of Open Space: Open space can be achieved either by creating common open areas or by reserving specific amounts of open space on each lot other than a required yard (500 sq. ft. of usable open space per dwelling unit currently required). These open space requirements are in addition to any public park dedication required. At least 60% of the project area must be preserved for open space and all open space must be usable. Points are awarded for every 5% of additional open space permanently preserved, as follows: 5 points 10 points 15 points 20 points 65%-69.9% usable open space 70%-74.9% usable open space 75%-79.9% usable open space 80% usable open space or more 20 points maximum .open space areas reserved for storm water ponding may account for up to 10% of the usable open space if the ponding area serves as an amenity to the development (i.e. native plantings, trails, etc.). N/A Contiguous Open Space: Open Spaces are connected with green corridors to reduce the occurrence of small or isolated open space areas. Points will be awarded for linking open space areas with natural corridors. A flat 10 points will be awarded for utilizing this technique. . 10 points maximum N/A B. Categorv: Pedestrian Quality The convenience of pedestrian movement through a neighborhood. . . . Objective: To locate all homes within a short walk to parks and open space and encourage pedestrian connections. Distance to parks and open space: Homes are located within a convenient distance to parks and open space. Points are awarded based on distance from units to a park, as measured along roadways or trails. Points are as follows: . % of units within a 500 foot walk to a park . % of units within a 1,000 foot walk from a park . 20 points maximum 14 points- 70% of homes within a 500 foot walk 3 points- 30% of homes within a 1,000 foot walk %/5 %/10 Trail connections: Encouraging the creation of pedestrian trails or corridors within a neighborhood. Points will be awarded for the creation of trails that accommodate pedestrian and/or bicycle movement within a development. Points will only be awarded for trails provided in addition to required sidewalk. . 5 points per trail . 10 point maximum o points Public Access: Providing for access by the general public to trails, parks, or other recreational facilities. A flat 10 points will be awarded for providing convenient public access to trails, parks, and recreational facilities. . 10 point maximum o points C. CateQorv: Natural Resource Preservation Objective: To encourage the preservation of unique topographical features, trees, wetlands, and other natural features. Tree Preservation: Encouraging the preservation of trees located on a development site. A minimum of 70% total caliper inches must be preserved at the time of development. Bonus points will be awarded based on the percentage of caliper inches preserved on top of the minimum requirement. Points are awarded as follows: . . . · 40% of allowed removal preserved: · 45% of allowed removal preserved: · 50% of allowed removal preserved: · 55% of allowed removal preserved: · 60% or more preserved: 20 point maximum 5 points 10 points 15 points 20 points 20 points N/A */f less than 35% total caliper inches are preserved, negative points will be applied for this category. Natural Feature Preservation: To encourage the preservation of natural resources and minimize disruption of the surrounding environment. Qualifying sites will be reviewed on a case by case basis. A flat 10 points will be awarded for preserving natural features such as ravines, hilltops, oak savannahs, and other woodlands. · 10 point maximum N/A Natural Resource Restoration: To encourage developers to restore wetlands, wooded areas, and other natural resources, and remove invasive species. Points are awarded on a per acre basis. Two points will be awarded per acre of natural restoration work or invasive species removal. · 10 points maximum N/A D. Cateaorv: Historic Preservation Objective: To encourage reusing existing buildings and structures or preserving specific site features which may be inventoried by the City, County, or State historical preservation office. Points will be awarded for each historic feature preserved. Five points will be awarded for small accessory structures, artifacts, and other small-scale historic elements. Ten points will be awarded for principal buildings and large accessory structures. Determination of point values will be evaluated on a case by case basis. · 10 points maximum N/A E. Cateaorv: Landscapina Objective: To encourage extensive internal landscaping in excess of what is required by code. . . . Points will be awarded based on % of landscaping units in excess of the minimum requirement for the underlying zoning district. · % of landscaping units/5= Point Value . 20 points maximum No Landscape Plan available, but the site does not appear to exceed the minimum requirement F. Cateaorv: Architectural Elements The specific design elements of housing units that would be guaranteed by covenant. Objective: To encourage the production of homes with attractive architectural elements that add visual interest. Covenants shall be provided to ensure that architectural features for which points are sought will be built. Points will be awarded based on the percentage of units that will have a particular feature. Features and applicable points are as follows: Front Porches: To encourage the use of front porches. Porches are considered front porches only if they face a street or common open space. Points will be awarded at a rate of 1 point for every 10% of homes with a front porch. To qualify, porches must be a minimum of 5 feet deep and 7 feet wide. . 10 points maximum 5.2 points Garages: To encourage garages that are recessed from the front face of a home, or side loaded garages. Points will be awarded at a rate of 2 points for every 10% of detached units with a recessed garage or side-loaded garage. . 20 points maximum · Any garage not meeting this standard will result in negative points in this category. 16.2 points (78% of homes have recessed garages) -3.8 points for qaraqe forward desiqns 12.4 points Building Materials: To encourage the use of brick, stone or other masonry construction as an accent or primary building material. Points will be awarded as follows: . 1 point for every 10% of homes utilizing brick, stone, or masonry as an accent material on at least 35% of the front face of a unit. . 1 point for every 5% of homes utilizing brick, stone, or masonry as the primary building material. . 20 points maximum 7.7 points- 77% of homes contain at least 35% brick . Building colors: To encourage building colors that are aesthetically pleasing and compatible with their surroundings. Points will be awarded based on visual interest of color palettes. A flat 10 points will be awarded when at least two colors are used on each wall with no color exceeding 70% of the total wall area. . 10 points maximum o points, all rear walls are one color Roof Pitch: To add visual interest by encouraging steep roof pitches. Points will be awarded based on the percentage of homes with roof pitches over 6/12. The point system is as follows: . . 7/12 2.5 points x % of homes . 8/12 5 points x % of homes . 9/12+ 10 points x % of homes 10 points maximum N/A- to be evaluated by building department 4J12~ 'f"~ :~ :::~ 1W12/ ~ Building Articulation: To encourage attached units that are articulated into smaller increments to add visual interest and variety by avoiding long, monotonous walls. . Points will be awarded based on the combination of differences in walls, roofs, and architectural details. Five points for each of the following techniques, or a similar approach, on both front and rear walls (To be eligible, a project must employ a technique on at least 75% of homes): o Stepping back of extending forward a portion of the fa<;:ade. 5 points o Use of multiple siding patterns, different textures or contrasting, but compatible, materials. 5 points o Window bays, gables, balconies, or similar ornamental features. 5 points o Variations in rooflines to reinforce the articulation. . . 5 points . 20 points maximum *double points will be awarded for 4-sided architecture 20 total points Other architectural features: There are a great number of architectural features that are unique to specific styles that can be awarded points. They include, but are not limited to: . Dormers- 3.65 points . Turrets- 0 points . cupolas- 0 points . decorative balustrades-1.6 points . accent windows- 5 points . columns- 3.45 points . porticos- .95 points . pediments- 0 points Demonstrated variety of: . shingle styles- .75 points . symmetrical & proportional window placement- 5 points This category is broad to encourage the application of compatible architectural features. The application of architectural features simply to get points will not be rewarded. . Points will be awarded based on percentage of homes with each feature. . % of units 1 20= Point Value . 5 points maximum for each feature . 30 points maximum for other architectural features 20.4 total points G. Cateaory: Roadwav Imaae The visual image of the development from public streets. Objective: To enhance visual interest of developments from public streets. Attached units: Attached townhome units are located on the interior of the development to reduce the amount of such units visible from roadways. Points will be awarded based on the percentage of attached town home units located on the interior of the development. . % of interior attached units/10 . 10 points maximum N/A- no attached units Home's front: The front of each home faces the street to create a more attractive streetscape. . Points will be awarded based on the percentage of homes that face the road. . % of homes that face the road 110= Point Value . . . . 10 points maximum 'Each rear-loaded home shall result in negative points in this category 10 points Rear Lanes: To create a traditional streetscape by encouraging utilization of rear lanes for vehicular access for single family detached homes. Points will be awarded based on the percentage of homes that are accessed by rear lanes. Rear lanes will need to be approved and have adequate setbacks to allow for safe passage of vehicles and pedestrians, and to allow for snow removal. . % of single family detached homes accessed by rear lanes/5= Point Value . 20 points maximum o points H. Cateaorv: Housina Diversitv The variety and quality of housing types within a neighborhood Objective: To encourage a wide variety of housing styles within a development. Style: To encourage a wide variety of models and/or elevations within a development. Points will be awarded based on the number of housing styles provided. · (Number of styles/number of buildings) x 20 . 10 points maximum 9.23 points Pattern: To encourage diversity in housing through the separation of like models. Points will be awarded for a pattern which assures that models will not be repeated within X lots of each other. Point values are as follows: 4 lots between the same model 5 lots between the same model 6 lots between the same model 7 or more lots between the same model 10 points maximum 2.5 points 5 points 7.5 points 10 points A developer must propose an arrangement that contains at least 2 lots between the same model. Points will be awarded in accordance with any number of additional number of lots between the same model. Staff will consider patterns of repetition on both sides of the street. o points, some models directly adjacent to each other . I. Cateaorv: Liahtina Objective: To encourage the use appropriately scaled ornamental street lighting. A flat 10 points will be awarded if pedestrian friendly, omamental street lighting is used in a development. · 10 points maximum 10 points J. Cateaorv: Pattern Book Objective: To encourage the creation of a formal book containing specific details on the entire development with descriptions and drawings of units, landscaping, and other designs referencing each section of the pOints system. A flat 10 points will be awarded for the creation of a detailed pattem book. · 10 points maximum N/A K. Cateaorv: Intearation with adiacent uses . Objective: To encourage projects that connect to adjacent properties and uses. A flat ten points will be awarded for a project demonstrates a conscious effort to link the neighborhood to public or semi-public uses (schools, parks, community facilities). · 10 points 10 points A flat ten points will be awarded for projects that connect to existing developments, or provide an opportunity to link to future developments. · 10 points 10 points TOTAL BASE POINTS POSSIBLE: 350 Points not applicable: 130 Total points available for project: 220 POINTS EARNED: 141.93 PERCENTAGE: 65% . BONUS POINT CATEGORIES: . A project may only receive bonus points on one of the following categories: A. Category: Senior Housing Objective: To reward developments that provide senior housing Points will be awarded on a per unit basis. · 1 point for every 2 units · 20 Points maximum B. Cateaory: Redevelopment Objective: To reward projects that redevelop blighted areas. A flat twenty points will be awarded for any redevelopment project in a blighted area. Qualification of a blighted area will be determined by the City. · 20 points maximum . . . PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PROJECT POINTS SYSTEM SPIRIT HILLS TOWN HOMES EVALUATION In order to qualify for the flexibility granted through PUD, projects must receive a minimum score of 75% of the applicable and attainable points for the development. These standards are in addition to the provisions of Chapter 20 of the Zoning Ordinance. Applicants must demonstrate that they have attempted to earn points in all applicable categories, and are encouraged to attain as many points as possible and not to merely clear the 75% threshold. A. Cateaorv: Open Space Preservation Open space is consolidated and usable Objective: To encourage all developers to have a unified open space plan that creates large areas of usable open space, accessible to residents of all units. . Percentage of Open Space: Open space can be achieved either by creating common open areas or by reserving specific amounts of open space on each lot other than a required yard (500 sq. ft. of usable open space per dwelling unit currently required). These open space requirements are in addition to any public park dedication required. At least 60% of the project area must be preserved for open space and all open space must be usable. Points are awarded for every 5% of additional open space permanently preserved, as follows: 65%-69.9% usable open space 70%-74.9% usable open space 75%-79.9% usable open space 80% usable open space or more 20 points maximum 'open space areas reserved for storm water ponding may account for up to 10% of the usable open space if the ponding area serves as an amenity to the development (i.e. native plantings, trails, etc.). o points- 26% usable open space 5 points 10 points 15 points 20 points Contiguous Open Space: Open Spaces are connected with green corridors to reduce the occurrence of small or isolated open space areas. Points will be awarded for linking open space areas with natural corridors. A flat 10 points will be awarded for utilizing this technique. . 10 points maximum o points . B. Cateaorv: Pedestrian Qualitv The convenience of pedestrian movement through a neighborhood. . . . Objective: To locate all homes within a short walk to parks and open space and encourage pedestrian connections. Distance to parks and open space: Homes are located within a convenient distance to parks and open space. Points are awarded based on distance from units to a park, as measured along roadways or trails. Points are as follows: · % of units within a 500 foot walk to a park · % of units within a 1,000 foot walk from a park . 20 points maximum 20 points- all homes within a 500 foot walk %/5 %/10 Trail connections: Encouraging the creation of pedestrian trails or corridors within a neighborhood. Points will be awarded for the creation of trails that accommodate pedestrian and/or bicycle movement within a development. Points will only be awarded for trails provided in addition to required sidewalk. . 5 points per trail . 10 point maximum 5 points Public Access: Providing for access by the general public to trails, parks, or other recreational facilities. A flat 10 points will be awarded for providing convenient public access to trails, parks, and recreational facilities. . 10 point maximum 10 points for access to park C. Cateaorv: Natural Resource Preservation Objective: To encourage the preservation of unique topographical features, trees, wetlands, and other natural features. Tree Preservation: Encouraging the preservation of trees located on a development site. A minimum of 70% total caliper inches must be preserved at the time of development. Bonus points will be awarded based on the percentage of caliper inches preserved on top of the minimum requirement. Points are awarded as follows: . 40% of allowed removal preserved: 5 points . . 45% of allowed removal preserved: . 50% of allowed removal preserved: . 55% of allowed removal preserved: . 60% or more preserved: 20 point maximum 10 points 15 points 20 points 20 points 'If less than 35% total caliper inches are preserved, negative points will be applied for this category. Information not available Natural Feature Preservation: To encourage the preservation of natural resources and minimize disruption of the surrounding environment. Qualifying sites will be reviewed on a case by case basis. A flat 10 points will be awarded for preserving natural features such as ravines, hilltops, oak savannahs, and other woodlands. . 10 point maximum Information not available Natural Resource Restoration: To encourage developers to restore wetlands, wooded areas, and other natural resources, and remove invasive species. . Points are awarded on a per acre basis. Two points will be awarded per acre of natural restoration work or invasive species removal. . 10 points maximum Information not available D. Cateaorv: Historic Preservation Objective: To encourage reusing existing buildings and structures or preserving specific site features which may be inventoried by the City, County, or State historical preservation office. Points will be awarded for each historic feature preserved. Five points will be awarded for small accessory structures, artifacts, and other small-scale historic elements. Ten points will be awarded for principal buildings and large accessory structures. Determination of point values will be evaluated on a case by case basis. . 10 points maximum Not applicable E. Cateaorv: Landscapina Objective: To encourage extensive internal landscaping in excess of what is required by code. . . . . Points will be awarded based on % of landscaping units in excess of the minimum requirement for the underlying zoning district. · % of landscaping units/5= Point Value . 20 points maximum example: 100 units required, 120 units provided = 2 points 20 points F. Cateaorv: Architectural Elements The specific design elements of housing units that would be guaranteed by covenant. Objective: To encourage the production of homes with attractive architectural elements that add visual interest. Covenants shall be provided to ensure that architectural features for which points are sought will be built. Points will be awarded based on the percentage of units that will have a particular feature. Features and applicable points are as follows: Front Porches: To encourage the use of front porches. Porches are considered front porches only if they face a street or common open space. Points will be awarded at a rate of 1 point for every 10% of homes with a front porch. To qualify, porches must be a minimum of 5 feet deep and 7 feet wide. . 10 points maximum o points Garages: To encourage garages that are recessed from the front face of a home, or side loaded garages. Points will be awarded at a rate of 2 points for every 10% of detached units with a recessed garage or side-loaded garage. . 20 points maximum · Any garage not meeting this standard will result in negative points in this category. 20 points Building Materials: To encourage the use of brick, stone or other masonry construction as an accent or primary building material. Points will be awarded as follows: · 1 point for every 10% of homes utilizing brick, stone, or masonry as an accent material on at least 35% of the front face of a unit. · 1 point for every 5% of homes utilizing brick, stone, or masonry as the primary building material. . 20 points maximum . o points Building colors: To encourage building colors that are aesthetically pleasing and compatible with their surroundings. Points will be awarded based on visual interest of color palettes. A flat 10 points will be awarded when at least two colors are used on each wall with no color exceeding 70% of the total wall area. . 10 points maximum 10 points Roof Pitch: To add visual interest by encouraging steep roof pitches. 4/12------------- ~,,~ 'I"~ 'I"~ :::~ 10/12/ ~ Points will be awarded based on the percentage of homes with roof pitches over 6/12. The point system is as follows: . 7/12 2.5 points x % of homes · 8/12 5 points x % of homes . 9/12+ 10 points x % of homes 10 points maximum . To be determined by building department Building Articulation: To encourage attached units that are articulated into smaller increments to add visual interest and variety by avoiding long, monotonous walls. . · Points will be awarded based on the combination of differences in walls, roofs, and architectural details. Five points for each of the following techniques, or a similar approach, on both front and rear walls. (To be eligible, a project must employ a technique on at least 75% of homes): o Stepping back of extending forward a portion of the fa<;:ade. 5 points o Use of multiple siding patterns, different textures or contrasting, but compatible, materials. 5 points o Window bays, gables, balconies, or similar ornamental features. 5 points o Variations in rooflines to reinforce the articulation. 5 points . 20 points maximum *double points will be awarded for 4-sided architecture . . . 20 points x 2 for 4-sided architecture= 40 points Other architectural features: There are a great number of architectural features that are unique to specific styles that can be awarded points. They include, but are not limited to: · dormer balconies- 0 points · turrets- 0 points · cupolas- 0 points · decorative balustrades- 5 points · accent windows- 5 points · columns- 5 points · porticos- 5 points · pediments Demonstrated variety of: · shingle styles- 5 points · symmetrical & proportional window placement- 5 points This category is broad to encourage the application of compatible architectural features. The application of architectural features simply to get points will not be rewarded. Points will be awarded based on percentage of homes with each feature. · % of units 1 20= Point Value · 5 points maximum for each feature · 30 points maximum for other architectural features 30 total points G. Cateaorv: Roadwav Imaae The visual image of the development from public streets. Objective: To enhance visual interest of developments from public streets. Attached units: Attached town home units are located on the interior of the development to reduce the amount of such units visible from roadways. Points will be awarded based on the percentage of attached town home units located on the interior of the development. · % of interior attached units/10 · 10 points maximum 4 points Home's front: The front of each home faces the street to create a more attractive streetscape. Points will be awarded based on the percentage of homes that face the road. · % of homes that face the road 110= Point Value · 10 points maximum 'Each rear-loaded home shall result in negative points in this category 10 paints . Rear Lanes: To create a traditional streetscape by encouraging utilization of rear lanes for vehicular access for single family detached homes. Points will be awarded based on the percentage of homes that are accessed by rear lanes. Rear lanes will need to be approved and have adequate setbacks to allow for safe passage of vehicles and pedestrians, and to allow for snow removal. . % of single family detached homes accessed by rear lanes/5= Point Value . 10 points maximum o points H. Cateaorv: Housina Diversitv The variety and quality of housing types within a neighborhood Objective: To encourage a wide variety of housing styles within a development. Style: To encourage a wide variety of models and/or elevations within a development. . Points will be awarded based on the number of housing styles provided. · (Number of styles/number of buildings) x 20 . 10 points maximum 3.08 points- 2 styles Pattern: To encourage diversity in housing through the separation of like models. Points will be awarded for a pattern which assures that models will not be repeated within X lots of each other. Point values are as follows: 4 lots between the same model 5 lots between the same model 6 lots between the same model 7 or more lots between the same model 10 points maximum 2.5 points 5 points 7.5 points 10 points A developer must propose an arrangement that contains at least 2 lots between the same model. Points will be awarded in accordance with any number of additional number of lots between the same model. Staff will consider patterns of repetition on both sides of the street. o points (models directly next door to and/or across from each other) . I. Cateaorv: Liahtina Objective: To encourage the use appropriately scaled ornamental street lighting. . . . A flat 10 points will be awarded if pedestrian friendly, ornamental street lighting is used in a development. · 10 points maximum 10 points J. Cateaorv: Pattern Book Objective: To encourage the creation of a formal book containing specific details on the entire development with descriptions and drawings of units, landscaping, and other designs referencing each section of the points system. A flat 10 points will be awarded for the creation of a detailed pattern book. . 10 points maximum Not applicable K. Cateaorv: Intearation with adiacent uses Objective: To encourage projects that connect to adjacent properties and uses. A flat ten points will be awarded for a project demonstrates a conscious effort to link the neighborhood to public or semi-public uses (schools, parks, community facilities). . 10 points 10 pOints A flat ten points will be awarded for projects that connect to existing developments, or provide an opportunity to link to future developments. . 10 points 10 points TOTAL BASE POINTS POSSIBLE: 350 Points not applicable: 70 Total points available: 290 POINTS EARNED: 182.08 PERCENTAGE: 63% . BONUS POINT CATEGORIES: A project may only receive bonus points on one of the following categories: A. Cateaory: Senior Housina Objective: To reward developments that provide senior housing Points will be awarded on a per unit basis. . 1 point for every 2 units . 20 Points maximum B. Cateaory: Redevelopment Objective: To reward projects that redevelop blighted areas. A flat twenty points will be awarded for any redevelopment project in a blighted area. Qualification of a blighted area will be determined by the City. . 20 points maximum . . . . . PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PROJECT POINTS SYSTEM SUNSET PONDS EVALUATION In order to qualify for the flexibility granted through PUD, projects must receive a minimum score of 75% of the applicable and attainable points for the development. These standards are in addition to the provisions of Chapter 20 of the Zoning Ordinance. Applicants must demonstrate that they have attempted to earn points in all applicable categories, and are encouraged to attain as many points as possible and not to merely clear the 75% threshold. A. Cateaorv: Open Space Preservation Open space is consolidated and usable Objective: To encourage all developers to have a unified open space plan that creates large areas of usable open space, accessible to residents of all units. Percentage of Open Space: Open space can be achieved either by creating common open areas or by reserving specific amounts of open space on each lot other than a required yard (500 sq. ft. of usable open space per dwelling unit currently required). These open space requirements are in addition to any public park dedication required. At least 60% of the project area must be preserved for open space and all open space must be usable. Points are awarded for every 5% of additional open space permanently preserved, as follows: 5 points 10 points 15 points 20 points 65%-69.9% usable open space 70%-74.9% usable open space 75%-79.9% usable open space 80% usable open space or more 20 points maximum 'open space areas reserved for storm water ponding may account for up to 10% of the usable open space if the ponding area serves as an amenity to the development (i.e. native plantings, trails, etc.). o points- 29% usable open space Contiguous Open Space: Open Spaces are connected with green corridors to reduce the occurrence of small or isolated open space areas. Points will be awarded for linking open space areas with natural corridors. A flat 10 points will be awarded for utilizing this technique. . 10 points maximum 10 points B. Cateaorv: Pedestrian Qualitv The convenience of pedestrian movement through a neighborhood. . . . Objective: To locate all homes within a short walk to parks and open space and encourage pedestrian connections. Distance to parks and open space: Homes are located within a convenient distance to parks and open space. Points are awarded based on distance from units to a park, as measured along roadways or trails. Points are as follows: . % of units within a 500 foot walk to a park . % of units within a 1,000 foot walk from a park . 20 points maximum 12.6 points- homes within a 500 foot walk 5.2 points- homes within a 1,000 foot walk %/5 %/10 Trail connections: Encouraging the creation of pedestrian trails or corridors within a neighborhood. Points will be awarded for the creation of trails that accommodate pedestrian and/or bicycle movement within a development. Points will only be awarded for trails provided in addition to required sidewalk. . 5 points per trail . 10 point maximum o points Public Access: Providing for access by the general public to trails, parks, or other recreational facilities. A flat 10 points will be awarded for providing convenient public access to trails, parks, and recreational facilities. . 10 point maximum 10 points for access to park C. Cateaorv: Natural Resource Preservation Objective: To encourage the preservation of unique topographical features, trees, wetlands, and other natural features. Tree Preservation: Encouraging the preservation of trees located on a development site. A minimum of 70% total caliper inches must be preserved at the time of development. Bonus points will be awarded based on the percentage of caliper inches preserved on top of the minimum requirement. Points are awarded as follows: . . . · 40% of allowed removal preserved: · 45% of allowed removal preserved: · 50% of allowed removal preserved: · 55% of allowed removal preserved: · 60% or more preserved: 20 point maximum 5 points 10 points 15 points 20 points 20 points */f less than 35% total caliper inches are preserved, negative points will be applied for this category. Information not available Natural Feature Preservation: To encourage the preservation of natural resources and minimize disruption of the surrounding environment. Qualifying sites will be reviewed on a case by case basis. A flat 10 points will be awarded for preserving natural features such as ravines, hilltops, oak savannahs, and other woodlands. · 10 point maximum Not applicable Natural Resource Restoration: To encourage developers to restore wetlands, wooded areas, and other natural resources, and remove invasive species. Points are awarded on a per acre basis. Two points will be awarded per acre of natural restoration work or invasive species removal. · 10 points maximum Information not available D. Cateaorv: Historic Preservation Objective: To encourage reusing existing buildings and structures or preserving specific site features which may be inventoried by the City, County, or State historical preservation office. Points will be awarded for each historic feature preserved. Five points will be awarded for small accessory structures, artifacts, and other small-scale historic elements. Ten points will be awarded for principal buildings and large accessory structures. Determination of point values will be evaluated on a case by case basis. · 10 points maximum Not applicable E. Cateaorv: LandscaDina Objective: To encourage extensive internal landscaping in excess of what is required by code. . Points will be awarded based on % of landscaping units in excess of the minimum requirement for the underlying zoning district. · % of landscaping units/5= Point Value · 20 points maximum example: 100 units required, 120 units provided = 2 points 19.8 points- 99% over minimum requirement F. Cateaorv: Architectural Elements The specific design elements of housing units that would be guaranteed by covenant. Objective: To encourage the production of homes with attractive architectural elements that add visual interest. Covenants shall be provided to ensure that architectural features for which points are sought will be built. Points will be awarded based on the percentage of units that will have a particular feature. Features and applicable points are as follows: Front Porches: To encourage the use affront porches. Porches are considered front porches only if they face a street or common open space. . Points will be awarded at a rate of 1 point for every 10% of homes with a front porch. To qualify, porches must be a minimum of 5 feet deep and 7 feet wide. · 10 points maximum o points Garages: To encourage garages that are recessed from the front face of a home, or side loaded garages. Points will be awarded at a rate of 2 points for every 10% of detached units with a recessed garage or side-loaded garage. · 20 points maximum · Any garage not meeting this standard will result in negative points in this category. 4.2 points- recessed or side loaded garages -15.8 points- front loaded qaraqes -11.6 Bui/ding Materials: To encourage the use of brick, stone or other masonry construction as an accent or primary building material. . Points will be awarded as follows: · 1 point for every 10% of homes utilizing brick, stone, or masonry as an accent material on at least 35% of the front face of a unit. . o points- utilized on less than 10% . 1 point for every 5% of homes utilizing brick, stone, or masonry as the primary building material. o points . 20 points maximum o points Building colors: To encourage building colors that are aesthetically pleasing and compatible with their surroundings. Points will be awarded based on visual interest of color palettes. A flat 10 points will be awarded when at least two colors are used on each wall with no color exceeding 70% of the total wall area. . 10 points maximum o points: town homes, one color used Single family- rear and side walls all one color Roof Pitch: To add visual interest by encouraging steep roof pitches. 4112-------------- ~,,~ 'I"~ 'I"~ :::~ '0/12/ ~ . Points will be awarded based on the percentage of homes with roof pitches over 6/12. The point system is as follows: . 7/12 2.5 points x % of homes . 8/12 5 points x % of homes . 9/12+ 10 points x % of homes 10 points maximum To be determined by building department Building Articulation: To encourage attached units that are articulated into smaller increments to add visual interest and variety by avoiding long, monotonous walls. . . Points will be awarded based on the combination of differences in walls, roofs, and architectural details. Five points for each of the following techniques, or a similar approach, on both front and rear walls. (To be eligible, a project must employ a technique on at least 75% of homes): o Stepping back of extending forward a portion of the fagade. 5 points o Use of multiple siding patterns, different textures or contrasting, but compatible, materials. o points, majority of townhomes one siding pattern and texture. Did not achieve 75% . . . o Window bays, gables, balconies, or similar ornamental features. o points- used on only 5% of homes o Variations in rooflines to reinforce the articulation. o points- used on only 23% of homes . 20 points maximum *double points will be awarded for 4-sided architecture 5 Total Points Other architectural features: There are a great number of architectural features that are unique to specific styles that can be awarded points. They include, but are not limited to: . dormer balconies- 0 points . turrets- 0 points . cupolas- 0 points . decorative balustrades- .25 points . accent windows- 5 points . columns-.45 points . porticos- .25 points . pediments- 0 points Demonstrated variety of: . shingle styles- 0 points . symmetrical & proportional window placement- 1 .15 points This category is broad to encourage the application of compatible architectural features. The application of architectural features simply to get points will not be rewarded. Points will be awarded based on percentage of homes with each feature. . % of units / 20= Point Value . 5 points maximum for each feature . 30 points maximum for other architectural features 7.1 Total Points G. Cateaorv: Roadwav Imaae The visual image of the development from public streets. Objective: To enhance visual interest of developments from public streets. Attached units: Attached town home units are located on the interior of the development to reduce the amount of such units visible from roadways. Points will be awarded based on the percentage of attached townhome units located on the interior of the development. . % of interior attached units/10 . 10 points maximum 5.5 points- 64 of 117 town home units located on the interior of the development . Home's front: The front of each home faces the street to create a more attractive streetscape. Points will be awarded based on the percentage of homes that face the road. . % of homes that face the road /10= Point Value . 10 points maximum 'Each rear-loaded home shall result in negative points in this category 10 points Rear Lanes: To create a traditional streetscape by encouraging utilization of rear lanes for vehicular access for single family detached homes. Points will be awarded based on the percentage of homes that are accessed by rear lanes. Rear lanes will need to be approved and have adequate setbacks to allow for safe passage of vehicles and pedestrians, and to allow for snow removal. . % of single family detached homes accessed by rear lanes/5= Point Value . 10 points maximum o points H. Cateaorv: Housina Diversitv . The variety and quality of housing types within a neighborhood Objective: To encourage a wide variety of housing styles within a development. Style: To encourage a wide variety of models and/or elevations within a development. Points will be awarded based on the number of housing styles provided. . (Number of styles/number of buildings) x 20 . 10 points maximum 3.79 points- 34 Single Family buildings/9 styles 24 Tawnhame buildings/2 styles Pattern: To encourage diversity in housing through the separation of like models. Points will be awarded for a pattern which assures that models will not be repeated within X lots of each other. Point values are as follows: . 4 lots between the same model 5 lots between the same model 6 lots between the same model 7 or more lots between the same model 10 points maximum 2.5 points 5 points 7.5 points 10 points . . . A developer must propose an arrangement that contains at least 2 lots between the same model. Points will be awarded in accordance with any number of additional number of lots between the same model. Staff will consider patterns of repetition on both sides of the street. o points (some models directly next door to or across from each other) I. Cateaory: Liahtina Objective: To encourage the use appropriately scaled ornamental street lighting. A flat 10 points will be awarded if pedestrian friendly, ornamental street lighting is used in a development. . 10 points maximum 10 points J. Category: Pattern Book Objective: To encourage the creation of a formal book containing specific details on the entire development with descriptions and drawings of units, landscaping, and other designs referencing each section of the points system. A flat 10 points will be awarded for the creation of a detailed pattern book. . 10 points maximum Not applicable K. Category: Integration with adiacent uses Objective: To encourage projects that connect to adjacent properties and uses. A flat ten points will be awarded for a project demonstrates a conscious effort to link the neighborhood to public or semi-public uses (schools, parks, community facilities). . 10 points Not applicable A flat ten points will be awarded for projects that connect to existing developments, or provide an opportunity to link to future developments. . 10 points 10 points . . . TOTAL BASE POINTS POSSIBLE: Points Not Applicable: Points Possible: 350 80 270 POINTS EARNED: 117.39 PERCENTAGE: 43% BONUS POINT CATEGORIES: A project may only receive bonus points on one of the following categories: A. Cateaorv: Senior Housina Objective: To reward developments that provide senior housing Points will be awarded on a per unit basis. . 1 point for every 2 units . 20 Points maximum o points B. Cateaorv: Redevelopment Objective: To reward projects that redevelop blighted areas. A flat twenty points will be awarded for any redevelopment project in a blighted area. Qualification of a blighted area will be determined by the City. . 20 points maximum o points . . . PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PROJECT POINTS SYSTEM TIMBER RIDGE EVALUATION In order to qualify for the flexibility granted through PUD, projects must receive a minimum score of 75% of the applicable and attainable points for the development. These standards are in addition to the provisions of Chapter 20 of the Zoning Ordinance. Applicants must demonstrate that they have attempted to earn points in all applicable categories, and are encouraged to attain as many points as possible and not to merely clear the 75% threshold. A. Cateaorv: Open Space Preservation Open space is consolidated and usable Objective: To encourage all developers to have a unified open space plan that creates large areas of usable open space, accessible to residents of all units. Percentage of Open Space: Open space can be achieved either by creating common open areas or by reserving specific amounts of open space on each lot other than a required yard (500 sq. ft. of usable open space per dwelling unit currently required). These open space requirements are in addition to any public park dedication required. At least 60% of the project area must be preserved for open space and all open space must be usable. Points are awarded for every 5% of additional open space permanently preserved, as follows: 5 points 10 points 15 points 20 points 65%-69.9% usable open space 70%-74.9% usable open space 75%-79.9% usable open space 80% usable open space or more 20 points maximum 'open space areas reserved for storm water ponding may account for up to 10% of the usable open space if the ponding area serves as an amenity to the development (i.e. native plantings, trails, etc.). o points Contiguous Open Space: Open Spaces are connected with green corridors to reduce the occurrence of small or isolated open space areas. Points will be awarded for linking open space areas with natural corridors. A flat 10 points will be awarded for utilizing this technique. . 10 points maximum o points . B. Cateaorv: Pedestrian Qualitv The convenience of pedestrian movement through a neighborhood. Objective: To locate all homes within a short walk to parks and open space and encourage pedestrian connections. Distance to parks and open space: Homes are located within a convenient distance to parks and open space. Points are awarded based on distance from units to a park, as measured along roadways or trails. Points are as follows: . % of units within a 500 foot walk to a park . % of units within a 1,000 foot walk from a park . 20 points maximum %/5 %/10 13.2 points (within 500 foot walk) 4.4 points (within a 1.000 foot walk 17.6 points Trail connections: Encouraging the creation of pedestrian trails or corridors within a neighborhood. . Points will be awarded for the creation of trails that accommodate pedestrian and/or bicycle movement within a development. Points will only be awarded for trails provided in addition to required sidewalk. . 5 points per trail . 10 point maximum o points Public Access: Providing for access by the general public to trails, parks, or other recreational facilities. A flat 10 points will be awarded for providing convenient public access to trails, parks, and recreational facilities. . 10 point maximum 10 points C. Cateaorv: Natural Resource Preservation Objective: To encourage the preservation of unique topographical features, trees, wetlands, and other natural features. Tree Preservation: Encouraging the preservation of trees located on a . development site. . . . A minimum of 70% total caliper inches must be preserved at the time of development. Bonus points will be awarded based on the percentage of caliper inches preserved on top of the minimum requirement. Points are awarded as follows: . 40% of allowed removal preserved: . 45% of allowed removal preserved: . 50% of allowed removal preserved: . 55% of allowed removal preserved: . 60% or more preserved: 20 point maximum 5 points 10 points 15 points 20 points 20 points */f less than 35% total caliper inches are preserved, negative points will be applied for this category. Information not available Natural Feature Preservation: To encourage the preservation of natural resources and minimize disruption of the surrounding environment. Qualifying sites will be reviewed on a case by case basis. A flat 10 points will be awarded for preserving natural features such as ravines, hilltops, oak savannahs, and other woodlands. . 10 point maximum Not applicable Natural Resource Restoration: To encourage developers to restore wetlands, wooded areas, and other natural resources, and remove invasive species. Points are awarded on a per acre basis. Two points will be awarded per acre of natural restoration work or invasive species removal. . 10 points maximum Information not available D. Categorv: Historic Preservation Objective: To encourage reusing existing buildings and structures or preserving specific site features which may be inventoried by the City, County, or State historical preservation office. Points will be awarded for each historic feature preserved. Five points will be awarded for small accessory structures, artifacts, and other small-scale historic elements. Ten points will be awarded for principal buildings and large accessory structures. Determination of point values will be evaluated on a case by case basis. . 10 points maximum Not applicable . . . E. Cateaorv: Landscapina Objective: To encourage extensive internal landscaping in excess of what is required by code. Points will be awarded based on % of landscaping units in excess of the minimum requirement for the underlying zoning district. . % of landscaping units/5= Point Value . 20 points maximum example: 100 units required, 120 units provided = 2 points Landscape plan not available F. Cateaorv: Architectural Elements The specific design elements of housing units that would be guaranteed by covenant. Objective: To encourage the production of homes with attractive architectural elements to add visual interest. Covenants shall be provided to ensure that architectural features for which points are sought will be built. Points will be awarded based on the percentage of units that will have a particular feature. Features and applicable points are as follows: Front Porches: To encourage the use of front porches. Porches are considered front porches only if they face a street or common open space. Points will be awarded at a rate of 1 point for every 10% of homes with a front porch. To qualify, porches must be a minimum of 5 feet deep and 7 feet wide. . 10 points maximum o points Garages: To encourage garages that are recessed from the front face of a home, or side loaded garages. Points will be awarded at a rate of 2 points for every 10% of detached units with a recessed garage or side-loaded garage. . 20 points maximum . Any garage not meeting this standard will result in negative points in this category. -20= all garage forward designs Building Materials: To encourage the use of brick, stone or other masonry construction as an accent or primary building material. . Points will be awarded as follows: . 1 point for every 10% of homes utilizing brick, stone, or masonry as an accent material on at least 35% of the front face of a unit. . 1 point for every 5% of homes utilizing brick, stone, or masonry as the primary building material. . 20 points maximum o points Building colors: To encourage building colors that are aesthetically pleasing and compatible with their surroundings. Points will be awarded based on visual interest of color palettes. A flat 10 points will be awarded when at least two colors are used on each wall with no color exceeding 70% of the total wall area. . 10 points maximum o points- Rear and side walls all one color Roof Pitch: To add visual interest by encouraging steep roof pitches. 4/12--------------- ~,,~ 'I"~ ::::~ 'i"/~~ 1W12/ '" Points will be awarded based on the percentage of homes with roof pitches over 6/12. The point system is as follows: . . 7/12 2.5 points x % of homes . 8/12 5 points x % of homes . 9/12+ 10 points x % of homes 10 points maximum To be determined by building department Building Articulation: To encourage attached units that are articulated into smaller increments to add visual interest and variety by avoiding long, monotonous walls. . . Points will be awarded based on the combination of differences in walls, roofs, and architectural details. Five points for each of the following techniques, or a similar approach, on both front and rear walls. (To be eligible, a project must employ a technique on at least 75% of homes): o Stepping back of extending forward a portion of the fa<fade. 5 points o Use of multiple siding patterns, different textures or contrasting, but compatible, materials. 5 points o Window bays, gables, balconies, or similar ornamental features. . . . 5 points- all units have decks o Variations in rooflines to reinforce the articulation. 5 points . 20 points maximum *double points will be awarded for 4-sided architecture 20 Total Points Other architectural features: There are a great number of architectural features that are unique to specific styles that can be awarded points. They include, but are not limited to: . dormer balconies- 0 points . turrets- 0 points . cupolas- 0 points . decorative balustrades- 5 points . accent windows- 5 points . columns- 5 points . porticos- 5 points . pediments-O points Demonstrated variety of: . shingle styles- 5 points . symmetrical & proportional window placement- 5 points This category is broad to encourage the application of compatible architectural features. The application of architectural features simply to get points will not be rewarded. Points will be awarded based on percentage of homes with each feature. . % of units / 20= Point Value . 5 points maximum for each feature . 30 points maximum for other architectural features 30 Total Points G. Cateaorv: Roadwav Imaae The visual image of the development from public streets. Objective: To enhance visual interest of developments from public streets. Attached units: Attached townhome units are located on the interior of the development to reduce the amount of such units visible from roadways. Points will be awarded based on the percentage of attached town home units located on the interior of the development. . % of interior attached units/10 . 10 points maximum 8.8 points- 115 interior units Home's front The front of each home faces the street to create a more attractive streetscape. . . . Points will be awarded based on the percentage of homes that face the road. . % of homes that face the road 110= Point Value . 10 points maximum *Each rear-loaded home shall result in negative points in this category 10 points Rear Lanes: To create a traditional streetscape by encouraging utilization of rear lanes for vehicular access for single family detached homes. Points will be awarded based on the percentage of homes that are accessed by rear lanes. Rear lanes will need to be approved and have adequate setbacks to allow for safe passage of vehicles and pedestrians, and to allow for snow removal. . % of single family detached homes accessed by rear lanes/5= Point Value . 20 points maximum o points H. Cateaorv: Housina Diversitv The variety and quality of housing types within a neighborhood Objective: To encourage a wide variety of housing styles within a development. Style: To encourage a wide variety of models and/or elevations within a development. Points will be awarded based on the number of housing styles provided. . (Number of styles/number of buildings) x 20 . 10 points maximum 1.21 points- 33 buildings, 2 models Pattern: To encourage diversity in housing through the separation of like models. Points will be awarded for a pattern which assures that models will not be repeated within X lots of each other. Point values are as follows: 4 lots between the same model 5 lots between the same model 6 lots between the same model 7 or more lots between the same model 10 points maximum 2.5 points 5 points 7.5 points 10 points A developer must propose an arrangement that contains at least 2 lots between the same model. Points will be awarded in accordance with any number of additional number of lots between the same model. Staff will consider patterns of repetition on both sides of the street. . . . o points- like models next door to and/or across from each other I. Cateaorv: Liahtina Objective: To encourage the use appropriately scaled ornamental street lighting. A flat 10 points will be awarded if pedestrian friendly, ornamental street lighting is used in a development. . 10 points maximum 10 points J. Cateaorv: Pattern Book Objective: To encourage the creation of a formal book containing specific details on the entire development with descriptions and drawings of units, landscaping, and other designs referencing each section of the points system. A flat 10 points will be awarded for the creation of a detailed pattern book. . 10 points maximum Not applicable K. Cateaorv: Intearation with adiacent uses Objective: To encourage projects that connect to adjacent properties and uses. A flat ten points will be awarded for a project demonstrates a conscious effort to link the neighborhood to public or semi-public uses (schools, parks, community facilities). . 10 points Not applicable A flat ten points will be awarded for projects that connect to existing developments, or provide an opportunity to link to future developments. . 10 points 10 points . . . TOTAL BASE POINTS POSSIBLE: Points not applicable: Total points available: 350 90 260 POINTS EARNED: PERCENTAGE: 97.61 38% BONUS POINT CATEGORIES: A project may only receive bonus points on one of the following categories: A. Cateaorv: Senior Housina Objective: To reward developments that provide senior housing Points will be awarded on a per unit basis. . 1 point for every 2 units . 20 Points maximum Not applicable B. Cateaorv: Redevelopment Objective: To reward projects that redevelop blighted areas. A flat twenty points will be awarded for any redevelopment project in a blighted area. Qualification of a blighted area will be determined by the City. . 20 points maximum Not applicable