Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Planning Commission Agenda - 03/07/2023
AGENDA REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, March 7, 2023 - 6:00 p.m. Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center Commissioners: Paul Konsor, Andrew Tapper, Eric Hagen, Teri Lehner, Melissa Robeck Council Liaison: Charlotte Gabler Staff: Angela Schumann, Steve Grittman (NAC), Hayden Stensgard, and Ron Hackenmueller 1. General Business A. Call to Order B. Consideration of approving minutes a. Joint Workshop Meeting Minutes—February 7, 2023 b. Regular Meeting Minutes—February 7, 2023 C. Citizen Comments D. Consideration of adding items to the agenda E. Consideration to approve agenda 2. Public Hearings A. Consideration of an Amendment to the Monticello Zoning Ordinance Related to Retail Rental Uses Including, but not Limited to Definition, Zoning Districts and Standards Applicant: Michelle Rice B. Consideration of an Amendment to the Monticello Lakes Planned Unit Development District affecting parking, accessory buildings, lot coverage, and related site impacts. Applicant: Monticello Lakes, LLC. C. Consideration of an Amendment to the Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan (Comprehensive Plan), Chapter 3, "Land Use, Growth and Orderly Annexation", re -guiding certain parcels from their existing Industrial designations to alternative Industrial, Employment, and Commercial categories, and amending the text of the Plan to add flexibility for implementation of the Plan's goals and land use objectives. Applicant: City of Monticello D. Consideration of an Amendment to the Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan (Comprehensive Plan), Chapter 3, "Land Use, Growth and Orderly Annexation" as related to Future Land Use Designations and Map; Consideration of Rezoning 108 Thomas Circle from 1-1, Light Industrial District to Industrial Business Campus (IBC) District. Applicant: Darrin Juve 3. Regular Agenda A. Consideration of Community Development Director's Report 4. Added Items 5. Adjournment MINUTES JOINT WORKSHOP MEETING - MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION & CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 7, 2023 — 4:30 p.m. Bridge Room, Monticello Community Center Commissioners Present: Paul Konsor, Andrew Tapper, Teri Lehner Commissioners Absent: Eric Hagen, Melissa Robeck Councilmembers Present: Mayor Lloyd Hilgart, Charlotte Gabler, Lee Martie, Tracy Hinz Councilmembers Absent: Sam Murdoff Staff Present: Angela Schumann, Steve Grittman (NAC), Hayden Stensgard, Ron Hackenmueller 1. Call to Order Mayor Lloyd Hilgart called the joint workshop of the Monticello Planning Commission and City Council to order at 4:34 p.m. 2. Joint Workshop Agenda A. Land Use Basics Overview Community Development Director Angela Schumann provided an overview of the workshop agenda and introduced consulting City Planner Steve Grittman of Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc. (NAC), who provided a presentation covering land use basics. The topic of the workshop stemmed from a discussion at a prior Planning Commission meeting related to their workplan, and how City staff could assist with a base understanding of the land use process to the newly appointed Planning Commission and newly elected City Council. Steve Grittman presented on land use basics to the City Council, Planning Commission and public. Mr. Grittman covered topics such as the history of land use, meeting conduct, relevant definitions, land use process including timelines for agency action, and annexation. This presentation can be found on the Planning Commission agenda page on the City's website. On the topic of Variances and Conditional Use Permits, Mayor Lloyd Hilgart asked if Variances are considered more subjective, in terms of findings for a decision, than Conditional Use Permits, in terms of consistency with the Zoning Ordinance. Mr. Grittman clarified that was correct, as Variances are used when practical difficulties of a given site creates an inability to meet the standards of the Zoning Ordinance. Whereas a Conditional Use Permit and its standards are more clearly defined within the Zoning Ordinance. On the discussion of Interim Use Permits, Planning Commissioner Andrew Tapper asked if enforcement is not carried out shortly after an IUP's time period is over, does that give the holder of the IUP any leverage to continue with what was temporarily allowed. Mr. Grittman clarified that though lack of enforcement in a case like that can happen, it would not hold up against the Zoning Ordinance. Mr. Grittman highlighted that findings for approval or denial are typically initiated by City staff when it comes to decision making for the Planning Commission and City Council. Ms. Schumann added that if the recommendation by staff is different than the recommendation of the Planning Commission, the Planning Commission needs to state their findings for approval. Those findings would be included in the corresponding resolution and meeting minutes. Councilmember Gabler asked if it is necessary for Planning Commissioners who vote in dissent to state their reasons for voting against the recommendation. Mr. Grittman clarified that it is good for them to do so, though not necessary. It is more important for councilmembers to do so in that situation, rather than the Planning Commission. No action was taken on the item. 3. Adjournment By consensus, the meeting was adjourned at 5:50 p.m. MINUTES REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, February 7, 2023 - 6:00 p.m. Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center Commissioners Present: Paul Konsor, Teri Lehner, Melissa Robeck Commissioners Absent: Andrew Tapper, Eric Hagen Council Liaison Present: Charlotte Gabler Staff Present: Angela Schumann, Steve Grittman (NAC), Hayden Stensgard, Ron Hackenmueller 1. General Business A. Call to Order Chair Paul Konsor called the regular meeting of the Monticello Planning Commission to order at 6:05 p.m. B. Consideration of approving minutes a. Regular Meeting Minutes—January 3. 2023 MELISSA ROBECK MOVED TO APPROVE THE JANUARY 3, 2023 REGULAR MEETING MINUTES. TERI LEHNER SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, 3-0. C. Citizen Comments ►SAT D. Consideration of adding items to the agenda None E. Consideration to approve agenda TERI LEHNER MOVED TO APPROVE THE FEBRUARY 7, 2023 REGULAR MEETING AGENDA. PAUL KONSOR SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, 3-0. 2. Public Hearings A. Consideration of an Amendment to the Monticello Zoning Ordinance Related to Electric Vehicle Charging Stations as an Accessory Use Applicant: City of Monticello City Planner Steve Grittman provided an overview of the agenda to the Planning Commission and the public. In response to inquiries towards the City staff on introducing electric vehicle charging stations to the community, City planning staff had developed Zoning Ordinance language to recognize these stations as an accessory use. In terms of previously approved charging stations, such as the Cub Foods parking lot, were originally recognized as a subset of the Vehicle Fuel Sales as an Accessory Use. The proposed ordinance amendments clarify and designate "Electric Vehicle Charging Stations" as its own separate accessory use, with a respective definition, standards, and zoning regulations. The proposed ordinance amendments also include language related to alternative fuels beyond electric, such as hydrogen fuel, natural gas and etc. Councilmember Charlotte Gabler asked if Home Owner's Associations would be allowed to place stations in places like common elements. Mr. Grittman clarified that that specific language related to this ordinance amendment had not been originally considered. An example like Autumn Ridge Villas, their approved PUD would have the ability to amend it to include electric charging stations in those common element parking areas. Community Development Director Angela Schumann clarified that Councilmember Gabler's question is related to properties with an existing CUP or PUD, would be allowed 2 stations as permitted by proposed ordinance, and that an amendment to said CUP or PUD would be required for more than 2 stations. Ms. Schumann also clarified that Section 5, Sub -Section C of the proposed ordinance, that commercial and industrial properties are allowed 2-6 stations, provided that they are not open to the public. A Conditional Use Permit would be required if the property requests 7 or more stations to be installed for employee use only. If a commercial or industrial property is interested in using stations on site for a public use, the Vehicle Fuel Sales as an accessory use language would apply. Mr. Konsor asked if there is a practical difficulty in monitoring whether residential parcels use their charging stations for revenue. Mr. Grittman confirmed that there is a difficulty in that situation, at that point it comes down to a question of enforcement. The intent of the proposed ordinance is to not allow the use of charging stations in a residential district as a commercial/public use. Ms. Schumann clarified that the ordinance does not allow for public availability of 2 or fewer stations in residential districts. While 2 or fewer station in commercial or industrial districts may be publicly available. As the number of stations increases, more standards and regulations apply within this proposed ordinance amendment. Councilmember Gabler asked if schools are allowed to utilize charging stations on site, given the provided ordinance amendments. Mr. Grittman confirmed, provided they are not for public use and only allowed for staff and students. The school would not be allowed to utilize stations from a commercial standpoint. Mr. Konsor asked if there are provisions within the proposed ordinance that does not allow for charging stations to be the only thing on a given property. Mr. Grittman confirmed that all charging stations and fuel sales need to be associated with a building on the property that is accessible to the public, such as a convenience store or shopping facilities. The exception to this standard is if a public parking lot is the principal use of a property. Ms. Schumann further clarified that the proposed ordinance states the stations must be accessory to the principal use. The stations cannot be a separate principal use, where a building not routinely accessible to the public is not allowed to place stations in their parking lot for public use. Mr. Konsor asked if parks within the City have the ability to place charging stations in their public lots. Mr. Grittman confirmed that a situation like that would fall under the language associated with public uses within the proposed ordinance. Mr. Grittman made note that the inclusion of electric vehicle charging stations on a given site does not affect the parking calculations established by the Zoning Ordinance. Ms. Schumann reiterated the one amendment to the proposed ordinance that Planning Commission raised was as follows. Within Section 5, Sub -Section B, of said ordinance, to include the following language: "If the proposed accessory EV charging fueling station facility is of more than 2 chargers, and is to be located on property subject to a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) or Planned Unit Development (PUD), an amendment to such CUP or PUD shall be processed." If the number of stations proposed is 2 or fewer, Sub -section A of Section 5 within the proposed ordinance would apply. Mr. Konsor opened the public hearing portion of the agenda item. Mr. Konsor closed the public hearing portion of the agenda item. PAUL KONSOR MOVED TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. PC -2023-06, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE AMENDMENT RELATED TO VEHICLE FUEL SALES, WITH AN ADDED AMENDMENT TO THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE WITHIN SECTION "5", SUBSECTION "B" OF SAID ORDINANCE, BASED ON THE FINDINGS IN SAID RESOLUTION. TERI LEHNER SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, 3-0. 3. Regular Agenda A. Consideration of Communitv Development Director's Re Ms. Schumann provided an overview of the agenda item to the Planning Commission and the public. Included within the Director's Report was an update on Council action of items the Planning Commission had previously provided recommendations. The various zoning ordinance amendments that received a recommendation for approval by the Planning Commission on January 3, 2023 are expected to move forward to Council for final decision on February 27, 2023. 4. Added Items None 5. Adjournment TERI LEHNER MOVED TO ADJOURN THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION. PAUL KONSOR SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, 4-0, MEETING ADJOURNED AT 6:58 P.M. Planning Commission Agenda — 03/07/2023 2A. Public Hearing - Consideration of a request for Amendment to the Monticello Zoning Ordinance Related to Retail Rental Uses Including, but not Limited to Definition, Zoning Districts and Standards. Applicant: General Rental of Monticello. Prepared by: Meeting Date: Council Date (pending Northwest Associated Consultants Commission action): (NAC), Community Development 03/07/2023 03/27/23 Director Project Description: The applicant is General Rental, which rents and occasionally sells, Additional Analysis by: Chief Building & Zoning Official ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS 1. Motion to adopt Resolution No. PC -2023-07 recommending approval of the Ordinance No. X for Amendment to the Monticello Zoning Ordinance Related to Retail Rental Uses, Section 153.012, Definitions, based on findings in said resolution. 2. Motion to deny the adoption of Resolution No. PC -2023-07 recommending denial of the proposed amendment, based on findings to be made by the Planning Commission. 3. Motion to table action on Resolution No. PC -2023-07. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND Property: Legal Description: NA PID #: NA Planning Case Number: 2023-07 Request(s): Amendment to the Zoning Ordinance relating to rental goods in commercial zoning districts. Deadline for Decision: April 2, 2023 (60 -day deadline) June 1, 2023 (120 -day deadline) Project Description: The applicant is General Rental, which rents and occasionally sells, a variety of equipment to the public, as well as to commercial or industrial customers. At the current location at the corner of Chelsea Road and Highway 25, the property includes an area of indoor merchandise and outdoor display of mostly larger equipment. The applicant's business is seeking an expansion to better accommodate new and future business, which cannot be handled Planning Commission Agenda — 03/07/2023 on site. One of the components of the business is the continued rental of goods and materials. Under the current ordinance definitions, rental of goods is not accommodated under the present definitions. General Rental's existing location is therefore existing non -conforming. ANALYSIS: As noted above, due to the current definition for Retail Commercial Uses, rental of goods is not included as an allowable retail use. The only ordinance mention of commercial rental relates to Vehicle Sales and Rental, or rental of goods as an accessory Outdoor Sales use. Under the current ordinance, the applicant's existing commercial rental facility would be a legal non -conformity. It should also be noted that other businesses have, or do, provide rental services in the community now. The applicant has noted that due to business volume, the business needs additional space, but the current location cannot accommodate that increase in size. To resolve this, the applicant is seeking occupancy of a nearby existing building, just south of the current location. Both sites are zoned B-3, Highway Business. To address the applicant's proposed expansion location (and to address the existing location in part), the applicant has requested an amendment to the text of the zoning ordinance adding the ability to provide rental services. Retail uses are currently permitted in the B-3 (Highway Business) District. Under the ordinance definition in place prior to 2011, the definition for Retail uses incorporated an allowance for rental of goods. The current ordinance defines Retail Commercial uses as follows: RETAIL COMMERCIAL USES (OTHER): A commercial land use where the establishment is primarily engaged in the sale of goods and materials to the general public, accepts payment or orders for, and delivers to the end user a good or service. Elements of the retail business include stock -in -trade held on the premises in the case of goods or provides a service to the end user on the premises. Retail businesses may arrange for delivery of a good rather than deliver the good concurrent with the transaction, or may accept payment or orders electronically in advance, for delivery of the good or service in person at a later date. Retail commercial uses do not include those business engaged primarily in delivery of goods for further treatment or finishing, or the sale of goods to businesses for subsequent resale, sale of goods from moveable motorized vehicles, or medical clinics. Where the Zoning Ordinance establishes a separate class of use for a specific business, such business shall be subject to the specific regulations applicable to such use. 2 Planning Commission Agenda — 03/07/2023 To address the applicant's request there are two potential paths for the City to consider. The preferred path would be to add a rental component to the retail commercial definition cited above. In this way, a retailer could choose to sell or rent its goods. In a general sense, there is no inherent difference between retail sales and retail rental. For indoor retail transactions, there would seem to be little distinction between sales or rental, provided the services are located indoors. Even if outdoor delivery were a component of the transaction, such as goods are retrieved from the indoor location and carried out to the customer vehicle, this is already a growing component of many retail facilities already in place. As such, staff recommends an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance definition of Retail Commercial Uses, adding language as noted in redline below: RETAIL COMMERCIAL USES (OTHER): A commercial land use where the establishment is primarily engaged in the sale or rental of goods and materials to the general public, accepts payment or orders for, and delivers to the end user a good or service. Elements of the retail business include stock -in -trade held on the premises in the case of goods or provides a service to the end user on the premises. Retail businesses may arrange for delivery of a good rather than deliver the good concurrent with the transaction, or may accept payment or orders electronically in advance, for delivery of the good or service in person at a later date. Retail commercial uses do not include those business engaged primarily in delivery of goods for further treatment or finishing, or the sale of goods to businesses for subsequent resale, sale of goods from moveable motorized vehicles, or medical clinics. Where the Zoning Ordinance establishes a separate class of use for a specific business, such business shall be subject to the specific regulations applicable to such use. This use definition would be applicable as a permitted use in the B-3 and B-4 Districts, and no conditional use permit would be required. It is also further important to note that any outdoor sale or rental of goods is already regulated by the Accessory Use ordinances for Open Sales and Outdoor Sidewalk Sales and Display. Therefore, any allowance for outdoor rental of goods would be required to conform to the ordinance standards for that use in any district in which it is allowed. Open Sales as an accessory use currently includes rental of goods in its definition. This accessory use requires a Conditional Use Permit in the B-3 and B-4 Districts and is not allowed in the City's other commercial districts. The applicant is not proposing any outdoor storage for this site. The applicant has indicated that by relocating the party facilities to the new site, there would be no outdoor display of these items. The only outdoor activity would be the washing of used goods prior to re -storing them indoors at the new location. There would not appear to be any distinction in this aspect of the business, provided the washing of the goods does not constitute an outdoor display. Thus, if the activity is conducted away from the public right of way, no inconsistency with the zoning district, definition or intent is foreseen. Planning Commission Agenda — 03/07/2023 The second path would be to create a new land use category specifically addressing rental of goods or equipment, adding that use to the B-3 District (and perhaps the B-4). Given there is little to no difference in the land use impacts between the sale or rental of goods, staff has not proposed an ordinance alternative for this option. STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION Planning staff recommends approval of the proposed ordinance amendment. The rental of goods is a commercial retail activity. As noted, rental uses are common in certain retail sectors and virtually indistinguishable from a sales transaction for retail facilities. The proposed use would continue to meet the intent of the Comprehensive Plan, and the intent of the Zoning Ordinance in implementation of the Plan for commercial districts. SUPPORTING DATA A. Resolution PC -2023-07 B. Ordinance No. X, Draft C. Applicant Narrative D. Aerial Site Reference Image E. Ordinance Excerpts 4 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2023-07 RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE MONTICELLO CITY CODE CHAPTER 153, MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE, SECTION 153.012 DEFINITIONS RELATED TO THE DEFINITION OF "RETAIL COMMERCIAL USES" WHEREAS, the applicant proposes to occupy and remodel a commercially -zoned property as a rental equipment business; and WHEREAS, the current zoning ordinance defines Retail Commercial Uses as those that relate to "sales" of goods; and WHEREAS, the rental of such goods is indistinguishable from sales when storage, delivery, and transactions occur primarily indoors; and WHEREAS, many existing retail establishments do currently, or have in the past, made both sales and rental of goods a part of their businesses; and WHEREAS, the sales of goods and/or the rental thereof create no unexpected impacts on land uses not otherwise expected and planned for in Business Districts where such activities are allowed; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on March 7, 2023 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: 1. The zoning amendment provides an appropriate means of furthering the intent of the Comprehensive Plan for the site by accommodating the use of business property for either sales or rental transactions that are important for the local economy. 2. The proposed amendment makes no other changes to the nature of uses that would otherwise provide retail transactions to the general public. 3. The change in zoning language will continue to accommodate future retail growth and expansion, as envisioned by the City's economic development goals. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2023-07 4. The change in language will have expected impacts on public services, including sewer, water, stormwater treatment, and traffic which have been planned to serve the property for the development as proposed. 5.. The business uses resulting from rental transactions, in addition to sales transactions, are consistent with the intent of the City's economic development objectives, as well as with the intent of the proposed zoning regulations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, that the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the Monticello City Council approves the zoning ordinance amendment to include rental uses in the relevant definition of Retail Commercial Uses. ADOPTED this 7t" day of March, 2023, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION MI - ATTEST: Paul Paul Konsor, Chair Angela Schumann, Community Development Director 2 ORDINANCE NO. X AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE MONTICELLO CITY CODE XV, CHAPTER 153, MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE, SECTION 153.012 DEFINITIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO ORDAINS: SECTION 1. § 153.012 DEFINITIONS is hereby amended to read as follows: RETAIL COMMERCIAL USES (OTHER): A commercial land use where the establishment is primarily engaged in the sale or rental of goods and materials to the general public, accepts payment or orders for, and delivers to the end user a good or service. Elements of the retail business include stock -in -trade held on the premises in the case of goods or provides a service to the end user on the premises. Retail businesses may arrange for delivery of a good rather than deliver the good concurrent with the transaction, or may accept payment or orders electronically in advance, for delivery of the good or service in person at a later date. Retail commercial uses do not include those business engaged primarily in delivery of goods for further treatment or finishing, or the sale of goods to businesses for subsequent resale, sale of goods from moveable motorized vehicles, or medical clinics. Where the Zoning Ordinance establishes a separate class of use for a specific business, such business shall be subject to the specific regulations applicable to such use. SECTION 3. The City Clerk is hereby directed to make the changes required by this Ordinance as part of the Official Monticello City Code, Title XV, Chapter 153, Zoning Ordinance, and to renumber the tables and chapters accordingly as necessary to provide the intended effect of this Ordinance. The City Clerk is further directed to make necessary corrections to any internal citations that result from said renumbering process, provided that such changes retain the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance as has been adopted. SECTION 3. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage and publication. The ordinance in its entirety and map shall be posted on the City website after publication. Copies of the complete Ordinance and map are available online and at Monticello City Hal Lloyd Hilgart, Mayor ATTEST: Rachel Leonard, Administrator AYES: NAYS: Passed by the City Council of the City of _ County, Minnesota, this day of 12 ATTEST: , City Clerk 2 Mayor I, Michelle Rice am the current owner of the General Rental Center (GRC) of Monticello at 216 Sandberg Rd Monticello MN 55362. 1 lease the structure from Ron Chihos along with on offsite storage across Chelsea road. GRC has been in Monticello since 1978 and I purchased it in 2019. General Rental Center rents heavy machinery, small equipment and party supplies to homeowners and contractors. We have been fortunate enough to continue to grow the business in the community and want to expand to separate our Party and Equipment business. I am seeking to lease the space at 1201 Highway 25 S Monticello, MN to relocate our party business into it. This will not only allow us to grow our business but will also help with back ups in the small service drive that leads to other tenants that are in the area. We are upgrading our software to improve efficiencies at the same time and will place a sign in the front that's TBD but likely General Party Center so its simple to train our clients which building to go to. We will lease the showroom in the front of the building along with the warehouse as we sell retail items to go with our party items. Customers will check out their orders at the retail storefront and head to the warehouse for pick up. Handheld devices with our new upgrade will allow for faster return process with the clients as well. Hours of operation are seasonal but we typically operate between 7:30-5:30 in season and 9-3 in the off season. We are closed most Sundays and have shortened hours on Saturdays. We look forward to continuing to grow in the community, filling up a large empty storefront and helping to speed up the process at our other location with equipment helping the flow of traffic in the existing area that we work within. Thankyou Michelle Rice Google Earth Imagery date: 5/12. . . � �� ■ � � . y > . \ � , y 40m , Camera: 521 m 45-17'38"N 93'4K.. Active park facilities P P P P P P P § 153.091(D) (private) (1) Assisted living C I P C 1 C P § 153.091(D) facilities (2) Cemeteries C C C C C C C § 153.091(D) (3) C None Clinics/medical C P P services Essential P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P None services Hospitals C P P C § 153.091(D) (4) Nursing/ See § 153.091(D) convalescent C C C C C C C C C C P Table (5) home 5- 1A C None Passenger C C C terminal Passive parks and open P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P space § 153.091(D) Place of public C C C C CP C assembly (6) 153.091(D) Public buildings or C C C C C C C P C C P P C P P§ (7) uses Public § 153.091(D) warehousing I 1 1 (8) temporary C I I § 153.091(D) Schools, K-12 C C C C C (9) Schools, higher C education Utilities (major) C C C § 153.091(D) (10) TABLE 5-1: USES BY DISTRICT Use Types Base Zoning Districts Additional Requirements «P, _ Permitted "C„ _ Conditionally A R R R T M B 1 1 Permitted O A 1 2 N R3 R4 H 1 B2 B3 B4 CCD BC 11 2 "I" = Interim Permitted TABLE 5-1: USES BY DISTRICT Use Types Base Zoning Districts Additional Requirements "P" = Permitted «C" _ Conditionally Permitted A R R R T R3 R4 M B B2 B3 B4 CCD I 11 I O A 1 2 N H 1 BC 2 "I" = Interim Permitted Commercial Uses Adult uses P P § 153.046(T) Auction house C § 153.091(E) (2) P P § 153.091(E) Auto repair - C C minor 1(3) Automotive wash P C § 153.091(E) facilities (4) Bed and C C C C C § 153.091(E) breakfasts (5) Brew pub P P § 153.091(E) (6) P P P None Business support P P services Commercial C P P § 153.091(E) lodging (7) P § 153.091(F) Commercial self- C storage See (3) P P P § 153.091(E) Communications/ P Table broadcasting 5- (8) Convenience C P P P 1A § 153.091(E) retail (9) § 153.091(E) Country clubC (10) P C § 153.091(E) Day care centersC C P (11) Entertainment/ recreation, P P C C C§ 153.091(E) indoor (12) commercial Entertainment/ recreation, CC C C § 153.091(E) outdoor (13) commercial Event centerLLHL C C C § T(15) 153.091(E)14) Financial I �F P C P § 153.091(E) institution TABLE 5-1: USES BY DISTRICT Use Types Base Zoning Districts Additional Requirements "P„ _ Permitted «C„ _ Conditionally A R R R T M B 1 1 Permitted O A 1 2 N R3 R4 H 1 B2 B3 B4 CCD BC 11 2 "7" = Interim Permitted TABLE 5-1: USES BY DISTRICT Use Types Base Zoning Districts Additional Requirements Permitted „C„= Conditionally A R R R T R3 R4 M B B2 B3 B4 CCD 1 11 1 Permitted O A 1 2 N H 1 BC 2 "7” = Interim Permitted Commercial Uses Funeral P P § 153.091(E) services (16) Kennels C § 153.091(E) (commercial) (17) § 153.091(E) Landscaping/ nursery P (18) business Offices, commercial 153.091(E) and P P P P P P P§ (20) professional services Personal C P P P § 153.091(E) services (22) Production brewery or micro- p p § 153.091(F) distillery (12) without taproom See Production brewery or Table § 153.091(E) micro- C C 5 1A C C C (23) distillery with § 153.091(F) taproom or (13) cocktail room Recreational § 153.091(E) vehicle camp C (24) site Repair C P P P P§ 153.091(E) establishment (25) Restaurants C P P C § 153.091(E) (26) Retail commercial uses (other) P P P § 153.091(E) buildings less (27) than 10,000 sq. ft. Retail commercial § 153.091(E) uses (other) C P P (27) buildings over 10,000 sq. ft. TABLE 5-1: USES BY DISTRICT Use Types Base Zoning Districts Additional Requirements «P„ _ Permitted "C., _ Conditionally A R R R T M B 1 1 Permitted O A 1 2 N R3 R4 H 1 B2 B3 B4 CCD BC 11 2 "I" = Interim Permitted TABLE 5-1: USES BY DISTRICT Use Types yp Base Zoning Districts Additional Requirements consumption as growlers. A production brewer may not have an ownership interest in a brewery licensed under Minnesota Statutes. PROFESSIONAL OFFICE - SERVICES. A commercial use involving administrative, clerical, or professional operations, and routinely including direct transactions or consultations with clients for such services. Such uses commonly include legal, financial, insurance, or real estate services, among others, but do not include retail sales of stock -in -trade goods. PUBLIC BUILDING OR USE. Any facility, including but not limited to buildings and property that are leased or otherwise operated or funded by a governmental body or public entity. PUBLIC WAREHOUSING. The indoor storage of equipment and/or materials by a government agency which may, or may not, be related to other principal uses on the same property. PUBLIC WATERS. Any waters as defined in M.S. § 103G.005, subd. 15, 15a, as it may be amended from time to time. REACH (IN RELATION TO FLOODPLAINS).A hydraulic engineering term to describe a longitudinal segment of a stream or river influenced by a natural or man-made obstruction. In an urban area, the segment of a stream or river between two consecutive bridge crossings would most typically constitute a reach. REAL ESTATE OFFICE/MOBILE SALES HOME. A dwelling temporarily used as a sales office for a residential development under construction for on-site sales. RECREATIONAL VEHICLE CAMP SITE. A lot or parcel of land occupied or intended for occupancy by recreational vehicles for travel, recreational, or vacation usage for short periods of stay subject to the provisions of this chapter. RECYCLING AND SALVAGE CENTER. A facility engaged solely in the storage, processing, resale, or reuse of recyclable and recovered materials. REGIONAL FLOOD. A flood which is representative of large floods known to have occurred generally in Minnesota and reasonably characteristic of what can be expected to occur on an average frequency in the magnitude of the 100 -year recurrence interval. Regional flood is synonymous with the term "base flood" used in the flood insurance study. REGULATORY FLOOD PROTECTION ELEVATION. The regulatory flood protection elevation shall be an elevation no lower than one foot above the elevation of the regional flood plus any increases in flood elevation caused by encroachments on the floodplain that result from designation of a floodway. REPAIR ESTABLISHMENT. An establishment primarily engaged in the provision of repair services for TV's, bicycles, clocks, watches, shoes, guns, canvas products, appliances, and office equipment; including tailor; locksmith; and upholsterer. RESTAURANT. An establishment where meals or prepared food, including beverages and confections, are served to customers for consumption on or off the premises. Such a facility may include indoor and outdoor seating and/or drive through services. RETAIL COMMERCIAL USES (OTHER). A commercial land use where the establishment is primarily engaged in the sale of goods and materials to the general public, accepts payment or orders for, and delivers to the end user a good or service. Elements of the retail business include stock -in -trade held on the premises in the case of goods or provides a service to the end user on the premises. Retail businesses may arrange for delivery of a good rather than deliver the good concurrent with the transaction, or may accept payment or orders electronically in advance, for delivery of the good or service in person at a later date. Retail commercial uses do not include those business engaged primarily in delivery of goods for further treatment or finishing, or the sale of goods to businesses for subsequent resale, sale of goods from moveable motorized vehicles, or medical clinics. Where the Zoning Ordinance establishes a separate class of use for a specific business, such business shall be subject to the specific regulations applicable to such use. RETAIL SERVICE. A retail service establishment is a form of retail business that creates a product of value (either good or service) on site and delivers said good or service to the end user on site. Examples of retail services include businesses which fabricate and/or craft creative goods on site and both display and sell such goods to the end user at the retail location such as artist studios, bicycle shops, photography studios or similar uses. Where the Zoning Ordinance establishes a separate class of use for a specific business, such business shall be subject to the specific regulations applicable to such use. RIVER, AGRICULTURAL. Rivers that run through intensively cultivated areas, mainly in the southern and western area of Minnesota. RIVER, FORESTED. Rivers that are in forested, sparsely to moderately populated areas with some roads; typically found in northeast, southwest and north -central Minnesota RIVER, REMOTE. Rivers that are primarily in roadless, forested, sparsely populated areas in northeastern Minnesota. RIVER, TRANSITION. Rivers that are in a mixture of cultivated, pasture and forest lands. RIVER, TRIBUTARY. Rivers in the Protected Public Waters Inventory that are not classified by the DNR as an agricultural, forested, remote or transition river. ROOF. The exterior surface and its supporting structure on the top of a building or structure. The structural makeup of which conforms to the roof structures, roof construction and roof covering sections of the International Building Code. Planning Commission Agenda: 03/07/23 2B. Public Hearing - Consideration of an Amendment to the Monticello Lakes Planned Unit Development District affecting parking, accessory buildings, lot coverage, and related site impacts. Applicant: Monticello Lakes LLC Prepared by: Meeting Date: Council Date (pending Northwest Associated Consultants Commission action): (NAC) 03/07/2023 03/27/23 Additional Analysis by: Community Development Director, Chief Building & Zoning Official, Project Engineer ACTION REQUESTED 1. Motion to adopt Resolution No. PC -2023-08 recommending an amendment to the Monticello Lakes Planned Unit Development District amending the approved plans for said PUD, based on the findings in said resolution, and with conditions as listed in Exhibit Z of the staff report of March 7, 2023. 2. Motion to deny the adoption of Resolution No. PC -2023-08 recommending denial of the proposed amendment, based on findings to be made by the Planning Commission. 3. Motion to table action on Resolution No. PC -2023-08. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND Property: Legal Description: Lot 1, Block 1, Monticello Business Center Eighth Addition PID: 155269001010 Planning Case Number: 2023-09 Request(s): Amendment to the Monticello Lakes PUD District Assignment of Development Contract (City Council decision) For reference, the amendment to PUD is being requested to: (1) Remove multiple detached garage buildings on site. (2) Accommodate modified site plan changes in support of the garage removal and other minor amendments. Deadline for Decision: May 16, 2023 (60 -day deadline) July 15, 2023 (120 -day deadline) Land Use Designation: Commercial and Residential Flex 1 Planning Commission Agenda: 03/07/23 Located within The Pointes at Cedar District (PCD) Zoning Designation: Monticello Lakes Planned Unit Development District Overlays/Environmental Regulations Applicable: NA Current Site Uses: Vacant Interim Use Permit (IUP) granted for sand/soil extraction Surrounding Land Uses: North East: South West: Vacant Land, (B-4) Mixed Residential (R-2, PUD) Mid Density Residential (R-3) Commercial/Vacant (B-4) Project Description: The applicant proposes to develop the property under the PUD approvals as originally granted, but with modifications as noted herein. PRIOR BOARD CONDSIDERATION The City Council approved the Final Plat and Final Stage PUD of Monticello Business Center Eighth Addition and the Development Contract and PUD Agreement for Monticello Lakes on December 13, 2021. The approvals were made with a series of conditions. The approved project, adopted as the Monticello Lakes Planned Unit Development District, consists of two 100 -unit multi -family residential buildings with underground parking, sufficient surface parking to meet the likely demand of the tenant base, and a community building that would serve as a rental office and model unit, in addition to a swimming pool and recreation area. The project was also approved with a series of detached garage buildings for separate rent to tenants of the project. Associated grading, utility, architectural, and landscaping plans were a part of the original project PUD approval. Since that time, the applicant has been working to resolve the conditions listed in Exhibit Z of those approvals, including the City Engineer's comments. In August of 2022, the applicant explored division of the project into four separate 50 -unit buildings but chose not to pursue and formally withdrew that amendment. 2 Planning Commission Agenda: 03/07/23 ANALYSIS: The applicant, a new development party for the Monticello Lakes project, is seeking an amendment to the approved PUD district and the incorporated plans. The most impactful changes are summarized as follows: 1. Removal of the detached garages. These garages were arrayed in an informal line along the Edmonson Avenue NE frontage between the street and the remainder of the development. A planted berm was situated between the street and garages. The change deletes the garages and replaces those areas with lawn. The planted berm remains as proposed. 2. The office and unit model located within the clubhouse building have been revised slightly to reduce the model unit from a two-bedroom to a one -bedroom unit. The remainder of the common areas and proposed amenities are consistent with the original design. 3. A two -car detached garage reserved for maintenance use is the only remaining detached garage building in the northeast corner of the side. The proposed amendment to the approved Monticello Lakes project is located within The Pointes at Cedar planning area. As a component of The Pointes at Cedar Small Area Plan (SAP) district, the expectations for development include residential land uses which embrace the Small Area Plan goals and which are designed to make use of that project's central amenity system. It is also intended that developments facilitate the infrastructure needs (especially stormwater capture for the lake) and the public recreational objectives of The Pointes area, primarily connecting to the public open spaces and trails in and around the site. Further, The Pointes plan seeks specifically to encourage architecture, site planning, and landscape design that incorporates the directions of the Small Area Plan objectives and policies. The conditions identified with the original Final Stage approvals are intended to support alignment with the planning for The Pointes project and these goals, in addition to the required standards of the subdivision and zoning ordinance. The following summarizes the original conditions of Final Plat/Final PUD approval, and provides comment on each of the original conditions, and other issues as they may be apparent. Staff has outlined analysis for those conditions still requiring resolution, as well as any related analysis specific to the amended PUD plans. 3 Planning Commission Agenda: 03/07/23 Final Stage PUD and Final Plat Plans — Original Conditions of Approval and PUD Amendment Analysis Revise the central entrance drive to create an expanded sense of entry and terminal view through the project. Comment: The final stage PUD plans illustrated a shift in the buildings to try to address this comment. As such, the final stage PUD site plan was approved with this arrangement and is as shown in the revised site plan. a. Develop a more identifiable visual focus point between the two building garage entrances on the west area of the site. The intent of this condition is to enhance the sense of entry to the project, and provide visual focal cues to drivers entering the site of the public space beyond. The current design appears to point toward a corner of the building northerly building, and it is not clear from the layout how this condition is met, either through the architectural aspects or the site planting and grading layouts. Comment: This condition was considered to be met by the original approval. b. Revise landscaping plan accordingly to reflect additional upright plantings and consistency with the southerly Pointes biome. Comment: The final stage PUD landscaping plan met this condition for the purposes of the entry median area. However, with the proposed removal of the detached accessory structures, the landscaping plan is reviewed again for conformance to the southerly Pointes biome with comments below. Provide an updated site plan showing all amenities proposed by the development team. Comment: A slight modification has been made to the central community building reducing the size of the building to contain a one -bedroom model rather than the original two bedroom model. The roofline of the clubhouse building has also been modified to reflect greater consistency with the prairie -style architecture encouraged in this area of The Pointes. Other amenities within the clubhouse building and overall site plan remain consistent with the prior approval. 3. If accessory garage structures are to remain, supplement the site plan with proposed additional detail relating to the detached covered parking structures, including building materials, architecture, and other features that fit with the required The Pointes SAP theming on the site. This would include an emphasis on all four sides of these buildings, including the sides facing Edmonson Avenue. Comment: The prior approval incorporated the allowance for the accessory garages. With this submission, the applicant has requested removal of the detached garages from the site (with the exception of the 2 -car maintenance garage in the northeast 4 Planning Commission Agenda: 03/07/23 corner of the site). The maintenance garage appears to include brick/stone treatment on the faVade. Materials details are required as part of the conditions of approval. Staff has also reviewed the amended site plans for consistency with the approved planned unit development's parking requirements. The original PUD approval allowed for a total site parking ratio of 1.33 spaces per bedroom. This ratio exceeds the current code requirement of 1.2 spaces per bedroom. The proposed plan illustrates consistency with the approved PUD parking ratio of 1.33 spaces per bedroom. The site plan includes 200 stalls within the buildings, plus 202 surface stalls. This stall count is consistent with both the maximum of 1.1 stalls uncovered and the total ratio of 1.33 stalls required. Resultant impacts on the landscape are identified below. 4. Provide information on site lighting, including photometrics, wall lighting, and pole lighting details and height. Decorative lighting fixtures are strongly encouraged to accommodate The Pointes SAP theme. Comment: The applicant previously provided a photometric plan. The plan does not include specification or cut sheets for any pole standards or fixtures or building lighting fixtures. The applicant is required to provide this detail and meet the condition. This condition has not been met in the current plans, and is ongoing. 5. Provide information on site signage. Decorative sign plans and materials are strongly encouraged to accommodate The Pointes at Cedar SAP theme. Comment: No changes to the previously provided sign plan has been made to date. Condition is on-going. 6. Revise the proposed grading plans to accommodate the following objectives: a. Maximize capture and pre-treatment of stormwater, directing it to other basin locations along the powerline corridor and/or the northerly abutting gateway, as directed by the City Engineering department. Comment: The City Engineer's office has prepared a comment letter for review of the revised plans. Compliance and resolution of the City Engineer's comments is listed as an Exhibit Z condition. Revise the slopes on the outside exposure of the building walls to create an undulating, natural form rather than a straight-line geometric bank, and accommodate access from ground units to the exterior. Comment: The applicant had incorporated limited undulation to the slopes on the westerly edges adjacent to the buildings. However, the slope on the southwest edge of the project adjoining the power line easement continues to exist as a long flat embankment. The intent of this condition is to naturalize the grading pattern and avoid the highly engineered view of the sloped edges facing the Pointes at Cedar public area. Both slopes should be Planning Commission Agenda: 03/07/23 modified to meet this standard. As such, this condition has not been met and is a condition within Exhibit Z. 7. Compliance with fire code requirements as directed by the City, including those specifically identified in the letter of November 5t", 2021. These recommendations relate to ladder access on the perimeter of the buildings, hydrant spacing and other site circulation and internal building fire code compliance requirements. Comment: With the final plat and final stage PUD, the developer's architect has provided a comment response letter. The letter indicates that an NFPA 13 -type fire suppression system is planned as required. This condition remains on-going as the applicant and City continue to work through the noted items. 8. Revise building architecture to reflect Pointes at Cedar biome for the southern area. Incorporate prairie -style horizontal emphasis as reflected in the Community Building, including varying and interrupted roof planes, significant increase in the use of stone and/or brick above the garage -level exposures on all four facades, and additional glass where practical as suggested in this report. Comment: The building elevations approved with the original PUD detail additional brick treatment along all four facades, including the main entry. The roof sections are broken primarily at the building ends, but roofline variations through the center of building are provided. The applicant has not provided side view building elevations. This is a condition of approval to verify design and brick/stone coverage consistent with the original approval. The buildings elevations that have been provided are in the majority consistent with the original PUD approval. There are small variations in the window placement, but it does not appear to very in actual count. In addition, it appears that there may be a slight variation in the window projection roof pitch; the applicant should verify and confirm that the roof pitch on these elements match the main roofline. It is noted that the applicant has indicated in the elevation notes that they may utilize fiber cement material in some locations in lieu of steel siding. Planning staff views this as an equivalent or better change. The applicant should verify exact materials in each location for review. The new detached maintenance building is small in size but reflects the general intent of the architecture approved for the primary buildings in the project and as noted above, a condition is included to require verification of a brick/stone treatment consistent with the principal building on the front facade. a. Clarify materials for decking and garage facades. Comment: The revised plans do not appear to detail materials for the decks. Applicant shall provide detail. This condition is ongoing. 9. Modify the landscaping plan significantly to introduce more prairie -specific shrub and perennial species, along with oak clusters of different varieties, with particular emphasis 0 Planning Commission Agenda: 03/07/23 on the outer portions of the project exposed to the common areas of The Pointes at Cedar project. a. Landscaping and grading treatments with the Gateway area beneath the powerline shall demonstrate compliance with The Pointes at Cedar biome concept. The applicant had added clusters of staghorn sumac in this area, and the slope is dominated by a planting of dry prairie seed mix, consisting of a mix of grasses, wildflowers, and perennial forbs. Staff would encourage additional common prairie species to diversify the planting plan, including shrubs such as leadplant, prairie rose, and wolfberry. While the powerline limits the ability of the applicant to plant taller woody materials, these shrubs would help represent the biome themes, and add variety to the landscape. Comment: This condition was not met with the original approval, and the applicant must revise the landscape plans accordingly. In addition, several overstory trees that were shown on the plan with the garage buildings have been removed. The tree count along the Edmonson Avenue frontage was approved at a count of approximately 52 trees, plus 9 trees planted in the right of way. The revised plan has retained the right of way tree planting but reduced the other tree count along Edmonson to 37 trees, divided between the Norway Pine and White Oak species, as originally proposed. Staff would recommend restoration of the original count. In addition, the landscaping plan should be updated to utilize the most current site plan, denoting the accurate location of parking areas, sidewalks and pathways in order to accurately reflect planting locations. The former garage locations have been replaced by lawn. The original berms, planted with a mix of the trees noted above and two varieties of ornamental grasses, have changed only slightly, with the addition of a sumac cluster in the northeastern corner. As noted above, staff believes the project should incorporate a greater number of shrubs in this planting area, and in greater variety of species to add interest and greater change throughout the year. These landscaping recommendations are listed as a condition of approval. b. With the modified form of the landscape, incorporate a more extensive prairie/oak planting palette as identified in the staff report throughout the project, enhanced plantings on berms, significant attention to seasonal plantings consistent with The Pointes prairie -savanna biome, and additional site contouring. Comment: The applicant has added some clusters of Swamp White Oak to the landscape. The central portions of the project area continue to be dominated by linear patterns of Red Maple, interspersed in some areas with Norway Pine. See comments below in Note "d" in this regard. 7 Planning Commission Agenda: 03/07/23 Landscaping plans should be intentional and consistent with the grading plan. Comment: Because modification of the slopes facing the Pointes at Cedar public area require further contouring, the landscaping plan should be revised to acknowledge those changes and reflect the new grading plan. d. Shrub clusters in the southwesterly slope, and both shrub and oak tree clusters in the westerly slope, are an important component of the landscaping plan. The plans continue to show an "engineered" slope design, which staff recommends to be more contoured and naturalized, both in the southwest and west boundaries of the site. Comment: This condition has not been met, pending revision of the slopes and grading, and is a condition of approval. e. As with the previous comment above, staff encourages a greater variety of shrub species beyond the sumac. It is also noted that the sumac plantings will require some maintenance to contain their aggressive spreading growth habits. Comment: This condition has not been met and is a condition of approval. 10. Address all plat recommendations of the City Engineer, including internal and plat perimeter easements. Comment: The plat has been recorded and plat easement requirements have been met. 11. Address park dedication recommendations of the Parks, Arts, and Recreation Commission, including dedication of easement for pathway and appurtenant purposes along the powerline corridor. Comment: Park dedication requirements are met through a combination of cash and land dedication via easement. These requirements are detailed in the Development Contract and Planned Unit Development Agreement and remain applicable. 12. Work with the City to ensure that connections to the adjoining Gateway and Commons area open spaces and pathways are properly placed for design, function, accessibility. and materials. Direct connections to The Pointes should consider concrete pathways. a. Develop additional connection points from each of the two principal buildings to The Pointes public spaces. The applicant has provided an additional connection to The Pointes from each building. Construction of these connections are internal to the site and not eligible for park dedication. Maintenance of these pathway connections will be the responsibility of the developer and the developer shall execute a maintenance agreement for these systems. 0 Planning Commission Agenda: 03/07/23 Comment: The site plans detail pathway connections to the Pointes intended public areas from each building and from the central drive. The City Engineer will verify grades and design plans to ensure access and usability are achieved. b. Revise internal sidewalk access to the main pathway to the lake area per the recommendation of the Park & Recreation director. This original condition has been met per the submitted site plan and is subject to the design condition noted above. 13. Compliance with the terms of the City's engineering staff letter dated October 26th, 2021. Comment: The City Engineer's office has prepared a comment letter for review of the revised plans. The amendment is conditioned on compliance and resolution of the City Engineer's comments. 14. Addition of brick or stone consistent with the principal building shall be added to the detached garage front fagade and the front fagade of the community building. (Condition added by City Council on November 22, 2021). This original condition has been met for the front fagade of the community building and maintenance garage. The applicant shall detail materials for both the community building and maintenance garage. 15. Comments and recommendations of other staff and Planning Commission. None were added. PUD Zoning The project requires an amendment to the Monticello Lakes PUD District which is specific to Lot 1, Block 1 of the Monticello Business Center Eighth Addition plat. As a PUD District, the goals, standards, and intent of the project are set by the Monticello Lakes PUD zoning district language. The standard of review for the amendment is whether the changes proposed continue to support the requirements and goals of the Monticello Lakes PUD District. For Planned Unit Development, the City allows flexibility from certain zoning standards under an analysis where the City finds that the modifications result in an enhanced project that meets or exceeds the City's land use objectives and applicable standards for the area. The acceptance of the detached garages was an accommodation and modification to the earlier Development Stage PUD. The garages were not a desired aspect of the project from the City's point of view, and their removal is viewed as a positive for the PUD. With the revisions to the site and landscape plans as noted in the conditions, both original and updated, the views into the site from Edmonson should be attractive, and, especially with additional modulation to the significant slopes, the project should blend reasonably well with the Pointes at Cedar public 0 Planning Commission Agenda: 03/07/23 area. The compliance with the zoning district intent, as well as the overall consistency with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan (the Pointes at Cedar Small Area Plan in particular) is a key consideration in approval of any PUD, and relevant to the conditions that are addressed as part of the PUD approvals. The land use proposal for multi -family residential and the density is consistent with The Pointes SAP's general goals of multi -family housing along the Edmonson Avenue exposure. The applicant has also continued to refine the various plan components of grading, drainage, and stormwater management, site design, landscape treatments, public space connections, and architecture in satisfaction of the condition of approval and alignment with the goals of The Pointes SAP. Planned Unit Development At this time, the amendment to the PUD applies only to Lot 1, Block 1 of the Monticello Business Center Eighth Addition property. The development agreement notes that the PUD will control development for Lot 1, Block 1. Phased Development The developer is seeking to develop only Lot 1, Block 1 at this time. At such time as development is to occur within Outlot A, the owner and developer of that property will be required to file any required land use and plat applications. STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION Staff is supportive of the proposed PUD amendment, subject to a series of conditions listed in Exhibit Z of this report. Primarily, they relate to finalizing the conditions applied to the original PUD approval for consistency with the City Council's expectations for the project and The Pointes area. In that regard, and with the conditions identified in Exhibit Z, staff recommends approval of the amendment to the Monticello Lakes PUD District. SUPPORTING DATA A. Resolution PC -2023-08 B. Aerial Image C. Narrative, PUD Amendment D. Proposed Amendment PUD Plans, including: a. Revised Site Plan b. Revised Architectural Elevations and Floor Pans c. Revised Preliminary Construction Plans for Utilities d. Revised Grading Plan e. Revised Landscaping Plan E. Final Plat 10 Planning Commission Agenda: 03/07/23 F. Prior PUD Plans, including: a. Site Plan b. Architectural Elevations and Floor Plans c. Landscaping Plan G. City Engineer's Letter, dated March 2, 2023 H. Fire Chief & Fire Marshal's Letter, dated November 5th, 2021 Z. Conditions of Approval EXHIBIT Z Conditions of Approval Lot 1, Block 1, Monticello Business Center Eighth Addition Amendment to Monticello Lakes PUD 1. Provide information on site lighting, including photometrics, wall lighting, and pole lighting details and height. Decorative lighting fixtures are strongly encouraged to accommodate The Pointes SAP theme. 2. Provide information on site signage. Decorative sign plans and materials are strongly encouraged to accommodate The Pointes at Cedar SAP theme. 3. Revise the proposed grading plans to accommodate the following objectives: a. Meet the requirements of the City Engineer's report referenced herein, and management of stormwater to support the Pointes at Cedar surface water system. b. Modify the slopes facing the Pointes at Cedar public areas to the west and southwest by adding undulation to the grading, with the objective being to naturalize the grade and fit into the Pointes at Cedar public open space. 4. Compliance with fire code requirements as directed by the City, including those specifically identified in the letter of November 5th, 2021. These recommendations relate to ladder access on the perimeter of the buildings, hydrant spacing and other site circulation and internal building fire code compliance requirements. 5. Revise building elevations to illustrate side building views and to specify exact materials and location for principal building materials, including decking; these materials shall be equivalent in extent and quality as the prior PUD approval. 6. Verify and confirm that roof pitch on the window projection buildings elements match the main roofline of the principal building. 7. Detail material types on the community building and maintenance garage facade; these materials shall be consistent with the principal building. 11 Planning Commission Agenda: 03/07/23 8. Update the landscaping plan to utilize the most current site plan, denoting the accurate location of parking areas, sidewalks and pathways in order to accurately reflect planting locations. 9. Modify the landscaping plan significantly to introduce more prairie -specific shrub and perennial species, along with oak clusters of different varieties, with particular emphasis on the outer portions of the project exposed to the common areas of The Pointes at Cedar project. a. Landscaping and grading treatments with the Gateway area beneath the powerline shall demonstrate compliance with The Pointes at Cedar biome concept. b. With the modified form of the landscape, incorporate a more extensive prairie/oak planting palette as identified in the staff report throughout the project, enhanced plantings on berms, significant attention to seasonal plantings consistent with The Pointes prairie -savanna biome, and additional site contouring. c. Restore tree counts to be similar to those which were part of the original approval, prior to garage building removals. d. Continue to work toward diversifying the shrub and perennial plant lists beyond those listed on the current landscaping plans. e. Landscaping plans should be modified to be consistent with the grading plan, given the expected changes to the slopes and grading as noted herein. f. Shrub clusters in the southwesterly slope, and both shrub and oak tree clusters in the westerly slope should be diversified beyond sumac, as they are an important component of the landscaping plan and the site visibility from the public open space areas. Such areas should be designed to comply with other plant variety and quantity requirements noted in this report. 10. Compliance with the terms of the City's engineering staff letter dated March 2, 2023. 11. Comments and recommendations of Planning Commission and other staff. 12 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2023-08 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR MONTICELLO LAKES IN THE MONTICELLO LAKES PUD DISTRICT LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 1, Block 1, Monticello Business Center Eighth Addition PID: 155-269-001010 WHEREAS, the applicant proposes to construct a 200 unit multi -family residential project in the Monticello Lakes PUD District; and WHEREAS, the property is subject to a Planned Unit Development approval governing the uses, layout, site planning, architecture, and all other aspects of development within the district; and WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted a request to amend the PUD by incorporating changes to the previously authorized accessory buildings, parking, and site planning; and WHEREAS, the site is a part of the "Pointes at Cedar" development area, governed by the Pointes at Cedar Small Area Plan as a part of the City's Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendments to the site are consistent with the long-term use and development of the property for industrial use; and WHEREAS, the changes take into account the requirements of the Points at Cedar development objectives and requirements; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on March 7, 2023 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: 1. The PUD provides an appropriate an efficient modification of the development on the site and is consistent with the intent of the Zoning Ordinance requirements for the area, pending final plans consistent with the conditions of approval. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2023-08 2. The proposed improvements will benefit internal and external uses of the site through redefined parking and circulation definition, removal of external accessory buildings, and other changes. 3. The improvements will make more appropriate use of the open space, both public and private, within the Pointes at Cedar planning district. 4. The improvements will have impacts that take advantage of the existing improvements in the area, including traffic, visibility, and public safety which have been planned to serve the property for the development as proposed. 5. The PUD flexibility for the project, are not affected by the proposed amendment, and continue to be consistent with the intent of the City's economic development objectives, nor with the intent of the PUD zoning regulations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, that the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the Monticello City Council approves the amendment to the CUP -PUD, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit Z of the staff report as follows: 1. Provide information on site lighting, including photometrics, wall lighting, and pole lighting details and height. Decorative lighting fixtures are strongly encouraged to accommodate The Pointes SAP theme. 2. Provide information on site signage. Decorative sign plans and materials are strongly encouraged to accommodate The Pointes at Cedar SAP theme. 3. Revise the proposed grading plans to accommodate the following objectives: a. Meet the requirements of the City Engineer's report referenced herein, and management of stormwater to support the Pointes at Cedar surface water system. b. Modify the slopes facing the Pointes at Cedar public areas to the west and southwest by adding undulation to the grading, with the objective being to naturalize the grade and fit into the Pointes at Cedar public open space. 4. Compliance with fire code requirements as directed by the City, including those specifically identified in the letter of November 5t", 2021. These recommendations relate to ladder access on the perimeter of the buildings, hydrant spacing and other site circulation and internal building fire code compliance requirements. 5. Revise building elevations to illustrate side building views and to specify exact materials and location for principal building materials, including decking; these materials shall be equivalent in extent and quality as the prior PUD approval. 6. Verify and confirm that roof pitch on the window projection buildings elements match the main roofline of the principal building. 2 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2023-08 7. Detail material types on the community building and maintenance garage fagade; these materials shall be consistent with the principal building. 8. Update the landscaping plan to utilize the most current site plan, denoting the accurate location of parking areas, sidewalks and pathways in order to accurately reflect planting locations. 9. Modify the landscaping plan significantly to introduce more prairie -specific shrub and perennial species, along with oak clusters of different varieties, with particular emphasis on the outer portions of the project exposed to the common areas of The Pointes at Cedar project. a. Landscaping and grading treatments with the Gateway area beneath the powerline shall demonstrate compliance with The Pointes at Cedar biome concept. With the modified form of the landscape, incorporate a more extensive prairie/oak planting palette as identified in the staff report throughout the project, enhanced plantings on berms, significant attention to seasonal plantings consistent with The Pointes prairie -savanna biome, and additional site contouring. c. Restore tree counts to be similar to those which were part of the original approval, prior to garage building removals. d. Continue to work toward diversifying the shrub and perennial plant lists beyond those listed on the current landscaping plans. e. Landscaping plans should be modified to be consistent with the grading plan, given the expected changes to the slopes and grading as noted herein. Shrub clusters in the southwesterly slope, and both shrub and oak tree clusters in the westerly slope should be diversified beyond sumac, as they are an important component of the landscaping plan and the site visibility from the public open space areas. Such areas should be designed to comply with other plant variety and quantity requirements noted in this report. 10. Compliance with the terms of the City's engineering staff letter dated March 2, 2023. 11. Comments and recommendations of Planning Commission and other staff. ADOPTED this 7th day of March, 2023, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. 3 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2023-08 & Is] ►11[61=il�e1►101ILI106Ii1&IJ/II&IIs] 01 Z ATTEST: Paul Konsor, Chair Angela Schumann, Community Development Director ENGINEERING F'G_ Cubed SURVEYING PLANNING February 17, 2023 City of Monticello Attn: Angela Schumann 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1 Monticello, MN 55362 RE: Cover Letter - Applications for PUD Amendment - Monticello Lake Apartments Dear Ms. Schumann, As you are aware, Rise Capital Partners (Monticello Lakes, LLC) have a purchase agreement to buy the Monticello Lake Apartments project from Peter Stalland. Per our discussion during the Zoom meeting on February 14, 2023, the minor revisions that the project buyer wishes to make to the site plan will be best handled through the PUD Amendment process. This letter details the specific plan revisions that warrant the PUD Amendment. 1 - Removal of the 6 eight stall accessory garages. To account for the loss of parking stalls in those garages, surface parking spaces will need to be added which is outlined below. The removal of the garages will reduce the impervious surfacing as the garages took more space than the surface parking that replaces it. 2 - Addition of a maintenance garage. A two stall maintenance garage is proposed east of the north building. This building will be used for storage of equipment and maintenance materials which are otherwise located in the garage area of the building. The architectural components of the 2 stall garage will mimic the components of the previously approved eight stall garages. 3 - Traffic routing where garages were previously planned. Removing the garages did not affect the traffic routing in the site beyond allowing the northeast emergency vehicle turn around area to be reduced in overall length. The turnaround still meets MnFire Code. 4 - Grading where garages were previously planned. Removing the garages simplified where stormwater runoff is routed. Runoff that previously was dictated by building code provisions is now greenspace which can sheet flow to the intakes just as they were previously designed. The watershed calculations have been updated in the Drainage Report based on the new surface cover scenario. 5 - Community Building - amenities are not being reduced but the marketing model apartment is being reduced to one bedroom and interior configurations have been revised which reduces the footprint of the building. The exterior finishes/appearance has minimal change. 6 - Steel siding versus fiber cement board. An upgrade to a Hardy Board/LP Smartsiding finish is being priced. This is mentioned as an amendment item to provide the applicant flexibility based on product pricing. The final determination should be made prior to the Planning and City Council meetings. 7 - Landscaping - The landscape plan has been updated based on the current site plan along with revisions to adhere to the Points of Cedar PUD District standards. 14070 Highway 52 Southeast, Chatfield, Minnesota 55923 Phone 507-867-1666 ♦ Fax 507-867-1665 ♦ www.ggg.to Parking Calculations: The approved PUD noted that by code, 2.25 parking spaces per unit were required (450 spaces) and that a maximum of 1.1 per unit are allowed to be uncovered (surface parking spaces). Flexibility regarding the total required stalls was granted in the PUD based on maintaining 1.33 spaces per bedroom. In each building there are 13 studios, 36 one bedrooms, and 51 two bedrooms, which gives us 13 + 36 + 51(2) = 151 bedrooms per building and 302 for the site. Multiplying 1.33 parking spots per bedroom equates to 402 parking spaces. Each building provided 100 stalls in the garage for a total of 200 covers spaces, which matches the original PUD. The remaining 202 required spaces need to be exterior surface parking. Spaces added to achieve this count were 2 near the added maintenance garage, 3 at the front of the community building, and 19 on the inside of the triangle green space of the south building, opposite of the drive where the detached garage buildings were previously proposed. The 202 exterior surface parking spots calculate to remain under the 1.1 per unit maximum (220 allowed). Please accept the applications and supporting documents. We have included the updated grading and construction plans as well as a resubmittal letter addressing the most recent comments from staff and WSB. Feel free to call with any questions or comments. If you any questions or comments, feel free to call. Thank you, Mark R. Welch, PE Enclosures (numbering based on prior submittal numbering system) 1 - Land Use Applications - PUD Amendment 2 - PUD Checklists 6 - Amended PUD Site Plan for Monticello Meadow Apartments 7 - CRW Architects packet for Apartments, Clubhouse and Maintenance Garage 9 - Construction Plans for Public and Private Utilities dated 2-14-2023 10 - Grading Plan for Monticello Meadow Apartments dated 2-14-2023 11 - Final Drainage Report for Monticello Meadow Apartments dated 2-14-2023 12 - Landscape Plan Cc: Monticello Lake Apartments, LLC, - current property owner/seller/initial developer Monticello Lakes, LLC - buyer/developer G -Cubed Inc., 14070 Highway 52 Southeast, Chatfield, Minnesota 55923 Phone 507-867-1666 ♦ Fax 507-867-1665 ♦ www.ggg.to NM I WM NN IN. YlM WM NM va W. vm Vt. Va NM Km NM nm nm ra VIM r4M va � . Ol -„Din r M a ,e• NM MM WM - 0I M1 96 a Ln to O1 0) T EDMONSON AVE NE EDMONSON AVE NE + ,�— 131 l31 -131 131 l31 l 1 31 -131 131 131 131131l31 / l Lc)o HAO HA O ----------- - - -------------- - --- ----------------- C I I r BERM BERM /�° ° � BERM I I / / ' %�� `2s° o I I I Sol o/ % °// / ��°,�C°moo 5 i I /,�°�° / I O / I POOL I \ I LEGEND WATER HYDRANT & GATE VALVE \ O © SANITARY MANHOLE ®o STORM MANHOLE & CATCHBASIN SIGNS N)GAS //�`xZS / pd GAS VALVE `2C° ° El o 10, ELECTRIC POLE COMMUNICATIONS BOX /O LIGHT POLE/WALL MOUNT LIGHT MAJOR CONTOUR 4 i )1 O MINOR CONTOUR —SAN SANITARY SEWER •� 7 %/`� O O� / STORM SEWER OVHE OVERHEAD ELECTRIC LINES LL� tri_ O/��"A.�,, N ///a,ZS / UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINES L I 7 \ \ j y / / \/ ?O ° / �� RAILING, UNDERGROUND NOK FENCE COMMUNICATIONS LINE O — GAS — GAS LINE n r/+I •� wi Y/ " `����iii�O WATER SERVICE DRAIN TILE / SUBDRAIN /0 PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOUR PROPOSED MINOR CONTOUR T91'L --------EASEMENTUNE rk�l /a� � BITUMINOUS SURFACING r 1 1 < y' .j� CONCRETE SURFACING I O / 2r I 1 LOT 1 � / `tr � BUILDING o / �� L ,I1II ilr 10I'� 1II' iL�� �Li I I il_J I illi I I IIL J� I i1L� i�J \, BLOCK 1 F %�zS / .,: LANDSCAPING irLF-J 1 MONTICTER BUSINEIGHTH ESS CENTER W / % / PROPOSED BITUMINOUS SURFACING I — / I ' �� // � � _ I --------------L ----------------------� PROPOSED CONCRETE SURFACING - --------------------------------------------------- - - - - - - - - - - - - --- --- j� O I I / / / SILT FENCE (PER STD. PLATE 6006) �lo GRADING LIMITS ° FEET) Pu ic / X 1060.00 X 1060.00 2•DOR EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION PROPOSED SLOPE PAT WAY / O j `�,zi° O� / INLET BARRIER (PER STD. PLATE & 5) PROPOSED EROSION CONTROL BLANKET I I 7� / D /�p / - (PER MNDOT 3885 CAT. 3N) ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE K-D'�, I / O // / - L-". DATE: 3/5/2021 Prepared For: (PER STD. PLATE 6002 & 3) ��O BY DATE CITY OF MONTICELLO MONTICELLO LAKE APARTMENTS RESUBMITTAL o I I / O / - r RIP RAP (PER STD. PLATE 4009) RESUBMITTAL ADB / GRAPHIC SCALE — SURVEYING12/8/2021WRIGHT SOD/VEGETATED FILTER STRIP COUNTY PRELIMINARY PUD SITE PLAN CLUBHOUSE m 0 20 w m - L_ OOOOOOOGOO RETAINING WALL MARK R WELCH 42]3fi ���iii 14070 Hwy 52 S.E. Ph. 507-567-1666 Fax 507-867-1665 CHECKED MRWHBNCHMMK: BUFFERYARD LINE �lo ° FEET) \ AGGREGATE SURFACING (IN 1IN=40FT I BOULDER OR BIG BLOCK TRANSITION O LIJ HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, DATE: 3/5/2021 Prepared For: REVISED BY DATE CITY OF MONTICELLO MONTICELLO LAKE APARTMENTS RESUBMITTAL ADB 11/17/202- OR REPORT WAS PREPARED Y BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERMSION P ENGINEERING DESIGNED MRW RESUBMITTAL ADB AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAPIS OF Baldur Real Estate, LLC o —�� O (� 0 SURVEYING12/8/2021WRIGHT DRAWN ADB COUNTY PRELIMINARY PUD SITE PLAN CLUBHOUSE ADB /28/202 THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 19356 MEADOWRIDGE TRAIL N PLANNING MARK R WELCH 42]3fi MARINE ON ST. CROIX, MN 55047 14070 Hwy 52 S.E. Ph. 507-567-1666 Fax 507-867-1665 CHECKED MRWHBNCHMMK: RESUBMITTAL ADB s/a/2o22 SHEET 1 CHANGES ADB /14/2023 DATE REO. No. FILE NO.: 20-408 LAYOUT 3 GP & CP Chatfield, MN 55923 —999A.FISHER OF 1 SHEETS C/) z LU 0 J J W MAIN FLOOR APARTMENT PA1 architecture + design group 5 g 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 � 1 2 A3.3 A3.1 U) z w 75rr w Y J Q J J W U PARKING GARAGE PA2 architectureiggrw 9 group COLORS Dm Dm End Dm - ADA Dm Dm -ADA Dm & Den Dm & Den- Corner ,,a SECOND FLOOR APARTMENT PA3 architecture design group ,OLORS Jm Dm End Dm - ADA Dm Dm -ADA Dm & Den Dm & Den- Corner )a THIRD FLOOR APARTMENT PA4 architecture + design group 1,400 SF OF STONE SHOWN(SEE DASHED BOXES) NOTE RIDGE VARIES AT ENDS AND MIDDLE OF BUILDING 8,866 SF OF ELEVATION THIS SURFACE VARIATION OF SOFFIT HEIGHT ALONG ALL ELEVATIONS 1,860 SF OF STONE SHOWN(SEE DASHED BOXES) 9,657 SF OF ELEVATION THIS SURFACE STREET ELEVATION 1 1 " = 30'-0" EXTERIOR FINISHES - TRUSS BEARING A 131'-33/4" THIRD LEVEL � 122' - 3 3/4" 1 SECOND LEVEL � 111' - 1 7/8" MAIN LEVEL � 100'0" PARKING GARAGE 89'-0" V ROOF GAF TIMBERLINE COLOR TO BE SELECTED FASCIA AND SOFFIT EDCO PREFINISHED METAL SIDING EDCO BOARD AND BATTEN IN PREFINISHED METAL WINDOW FIBERGLASS OR VINYL WITH ENERGY STAR RATING ADD ALLOWANCE FOR: BAND TRIM AROUND WINDOWS THIN BRICK OR STONE FACE ACCENT PREFINISHED METAL MAY BE SUBSTITUTED WITH FIBER CEMENT SIDING PRODUCTS �w Y O J J W C.) H Z O APARTMENT BUILDING ELEVATIONS PA5 architectureiggrw 9 group 1,579 SF OF STONE SHOWN(SEE DASHED BOXES) NOTE RIDGE VARIES AT ENDS AND MIDDLE OF BUILDING 11,456 SF OF ELEVATION THIS SURFACE VARIATION OF SOFFIT HEIGHT ALONG ALL ELEVATIONS 1 STREET ELEVATION 2 1 " = 30'-0" 1,325 SF OF STONE SHOWN(SEE DASHED BOXES) 11.345 SF OF ELEVATION THIS SURFACE =ARING A 31'-33/4" 3D LEVEL 22'- 3 3/4" SID LEVEL 11' - 1 7/8" ►IN LEVEL 100'-0" GARAGE 89'-0" PARKLAND ELEVATION 2 1 " = 30'-0" L_ lwl w wl - I THIRD LEVEL 122'- 3 3/4" SECOND LEVEL I 111' - 1 7/8" MAIN LEVEL I 100'-0" =PARKING GARAGE 89' - 0" APARTMENT BUILDING ELEVATIONS PA6 w Q J 0 J J W C.) z architecture + design group 114 73'- 8" �0 MARKETING MODEL 00 ICE � MOVIE PARTY 77 15x17 23x17 STOR. _ ICE LOBBY HEARTH ROO 7x 26 /�� 26 0 o DO 0 ENTR 0 ° 0 0 0 F-1 0 JAN. Lu Lu M€N�) YOGA FITNESS 24 X 13 22 X 15 FAM. 0 0 OMNI 0 62'- 4" CLUBHOUSE PLAN PA7 architecture + design group ENTRY OF CLUBHOUSE 1/16" = 1'-0" SIDE ELEVATION OF CLUBHOUSE 1/16" = 1'-0" 2 PATIO ELEVATION OF CLUBHOUSE 1 /16" = 1'-0" n SIDE ENTRY ELEVATION OF CLUBHOUSE Y 1/16" = 1'-0" CLUBHOUSE ELEVATIONS LEVEL 100'-0" 1 LEVEL � 100'-0" 0 J J W PA8 +rcrrou designgroup N 28'- 1 1/4" J EXTERIOR GARAGES 1/8" = 1'-0" GARAGE FRONT ELEVATION 1/8" = 1 '-0" Min GARAGE END ELEVATION 2 1/8" = 1'-0" 12" n GARAGE BACK ELEVATION 1/8" = 1 '-0" n GARAGE END ELEVATION 1 /8" = 1 '-0" EXTERNAL GARAGE PA9 +rcrrou designgroup W ,ar• � � y ° >A �" i � � : 'a � x. ,�'++� C- rq. em1 ,fie 1 � RENDERING LU Q J PA 10 design 9 group WARNING BEFORE DIGGING CALL GOPHER STATE ONE CALL FOR LOCATIONS. DIAL — 1-800-252-1166 REQUIRED BY LAW W01111)�lYl',�If11Y[tll��,l��0[ilt#ll[�l1lY�101111[i71��i��6111�101OY1� I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. MARK R WELCH DATE X/X/XX REG. NO. 42736 DATE: 6/3/2021 Prepared For: Baldur Real Estate, LLC 19356 MEADOW RIDGE TRAIL N MARINE ON ST. CROIX, MN 55047 FILE NO.: 20-408 LAYOUT 3 GP & CP 14070 Hwy 52 S.E. Chatfield, MN 55923 ENGINEERING SURVEYING PLANNING Ph. 507-867-1666 Fax 507-867-1665 www.ggg.to APPROVED BY CITY ENGINEER DATE SHEET INDEX SHEET INDEX & VICINITY MAP EDULES & NOTES, DETAILS & TYPICAL SECTIONS FILE FOR PRIVATE UTILITIES STANDARD PLATES EROSION CONTROL PLAN VICINITY MAP T. 121 N., R. 25 W., SEC. 14 "NOT TO SCALE" DESIGNED MRW DRAWN ADB CHECKED MRW REVISED RESUBMITTAL RESUBMITTAL RESUBMITTAL RESUBMITTAL FISHER — PUD BY ADB1018i202 CITY OF MONTICELLO ADB 11/29/202 WRIGHT COUNTY ADB 12/6/2021 ADB 12/8/2022 BENCHMARK: 14 TOP NUT HYDRANT ON SCHOOL BOULEVARD 300' WEST OF ADB 2/14/2023 / / THE INTERSECTION WITH EDMONSON AVENUE NE, ELEV:965.13 MONTICELLO LAKE APARTMENTS TITLE SHEET SHEET I OF 15 SHEETS WARNING BEFORE DIGGING CALL GOPHER STATE ONE CALL FOR LOCATIONS. DIAL - 1-800-252-1166 REQUIRED BY LAW WATERMAIN SCHEDULE MONTICELLO LAKE APARTMENTS WATERMAIN NOTES NUMBER STATION Alignment ITEMS BREAKOFF ELEV W-1 11+51.72 - CL WATERMAIN LOOP 2 F&I: WET -TAP 8" LINE INTO EX 16" DIP MAIN Neenah Casting & Grates W-2 10+45.41 - CL WATERMAIN LOOP 2 F&I: 8" - 11.25° BEND STORM BASINS W-3 10+23.41 - CL WATERMAIN LOOP 2 F&I: 8"x8" TEE, 8"x6" REDUCER 3'W, 6" GATE VALVE 20'W, 6" HYDRANT 23'W 961.64 W-4 15+65.36 - 11.00' L APARTMENT SANITARY F&I: 8"x8" TEE, 8" GATE VALVE 3'W, 8" PLUG 55'W R -3067-V W-5 15+85.09 - 11.49'L APARTMENT SANITARY F&I: 8" - 45° BEND MH S-1 W-6 16+13.85 - 11.00' R APARTMENT SANITARY F&I: 8" - 45° BEND 15" HDPE W-7 12+62.75 - CL WATERMAIN LOOP F&I: 8"x8" CROSS, 2 - 8" 11.25° BEND TE & 2'W, 3-8' GATE VALVE 3'N TS & TW OF W BEND 10+94.43 W-8 21+33.68 - 11.00' R APARTMENT SANITARY F&I: 8"x6" TEE, 6' GATE VALVE 4'N, 6" HYDRANT 7'N 967.06 W-9 21+84.11 - 11.00' R APARTMENT SANITARY F&I: 8" - 45° BEND 0.40% W-10 12+96.46 - 11.00' R STORM MAIN F&I: 8" - 22.5° BEND CL W-11 13+21.31 - 11.00' R STORM MAIN F&I: 8"x8" TEE, 8"x6" REDUCER 54'W, 8' GATE VALVE 3'N, 6' GATE VALVE 57'W, 6" HYDRANT 60'W 961.32 W-12 12+50.75 - CL WATERMAIN LOOP F&I: 8" - 11.25° BEND MH S-4 W-13 10+00.00 - CL WATERMAIN LOOP F&I: 8" - 90° BEND, 8"x6" REDUCER 2'W, 6" GATE VALVE 5'W; 6" HYDRANT 8'W 968.23 W-14 14+72.17 - CL WATERMAIN LOOP F&I: WET -TAP 8" LINE INTO EX 16" DIP MAIN 963.00 *ALL WATERMAIN IS CL 52 DUCTILE IRON PIPE STORM SCHEDULE GOVERNING SPECIFICATIONS - CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL UTILITY CONNECTION PERMITS FROM THE CITY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. - THE CITY WILL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY ADDITIONAL COSTS INCURRED THAT IS ASSOCIATED WITH VARIATIONS IN THE UTILITY AS -BUILT ELEVATIONS. THESE ELEVATIONS SHALL BE VERIFIED IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. - THE PLANS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS IN THE CITY GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS ON THE COVER SHEET. - THE CITY SPECIFICATIONS REQUIRE THAT SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER REQUIRE TELEVISING. VIDEO FILES SHALL BE PROVIDED TO THE CITY FOR REVIEW. SERVICE SCHEDULE BUILDING 1 - SEE SHEETS 4 OR 5 BUILDING 2 - SEE SHEET 6 COMMUNITY BUILDING - SEE SHEET 6 MONTICELLO MEADOW APARTMENTS Structure Number Structure Type Casting Elevation Structure Outlet Elevation Linear Footage Pipe Size Gradient Percent Flow to Structure Number Downstream Structure Inlet Elevation Neenah Casting & Grates Station Offset from CL alignment Alignment Notes / Other Inverts STORM BASINS CB ED 1 Type 1 CB 966.41 962.41 94.43 15" HDPE 1.00% MH S-1 961.47 R -3067-V 10+00.00 CL STORM BASINS Casting MH S-1 Type 4 MH (48") 967.14 961.47 82.25 15" HDPE 1.00% CB 5 960.65 244.43 10+94.43 CL STORM BASINS 22+26.14 - CL CB 3 Type 4 CB (48") 966.02 958.27 74.97 24" RCP 0.40% CB 5 957.97 20.11 11+76.67 CL STORM BASINS APARTMENT SANITARY CB 5 Type 4 CB (48") 965.78 958.10 32.73 24" RCP 0.40% MH S-4 957.97 3001 12+18.91 CL STORM BASINS 0.40% MH S-2 Type 4 MH (48") 967.00 963.00 220.77 15" HDPE 1.80% MH S-4 959.03 941.78 14+72.41 CL STORM BASINS 8" PVC STORM MAIN MH S-3 Type 4 MH (48") 967.61 963.61 99.22 15" HDPE 1.00% MH S-4 962.62 10+00.00 CL STORM MAIN MH S-4 Type 4 MH (60") 966.15 957.97 121.36 24" RCP 0.49% MH S-5 957.37 10+99.22 CL STORM MAIN MH S-5 Type 4 MH (60") 966.43 955.00 176.90 36" RCP 0.57% MH S-6 954.00 12+20.58 CL STORM MAIN MH S-6 Type 4 MH (60") 960.95 954.00 146.39 36" RCP 1.02% OUTLET 1 952.50 13+97.48 CL STORM MAIN SOUTH BLD TRENCH DRAIN CB 1 Type 4 CB (48") 967.70 963.75 33.10 15" HDPE 2.27% MH S-5 963.00 10+00.00 CL SOUTH BLD TRENCH DRAIN CB 4 Type 4 CB (48") 966.75 963.00 39.83 15" HDPE 2.26% CB 1 962.10 10+33.10 CL SOUTH BLD TRENCH DRAIN TRENCH DRAIN 958.00 50.52 15" HDPE 1.33% MH S-5 957.33 11+23.45 CL SOUTH BLD TRENCH DRAIN CB ED 2 CB ED 2 Type 1 CB 963.39 959.39 72.00 15" RCP 0.54% OUTLET 2 959.00 R -3067-V 10+00.00 CL CB ED 2 POWERLINE STORM MH S-7 Type 4 MH (48") 960.70 957.82 460.00 18" RCP 0.50% MH S-8 955.50 10+00.00 CL POWERLINE STORM MH S-8 Type 4 MH (48") 966.10 955.50 200.00 18" RCP 1.50% OUTLET 3 952.50 14+60.00 CL POWERLINE STORM NORTH BLD TRENCH DRAIN TRENCH DRAIN 960.00 110.79 15" HDPE 0.40% CB 2 959.56 10+30.82 CL NORTH BLD TRENCH DRAIN CB 2 Type 4 CB (48") 967.86 959.56 162.84 15" HDPE 0.50% CB 3 958.75 11+41.61 CL NORTH BLD TRENCH DRAIN SANITARY SCHEDULE Monticello Meadow Apartments 12/6/2021 Structure Downstream Structure Structure Pipe Pipe Pipe Neenah Downstream Other Number Rim Inv In Inv Out Inv In Type Depth Length Size Slope Alignment Station - Offset Casting Structure Inverts MH No. 1 968.66 947.00 946.02 3001 21.66 244.43 8" PVC 0.40% APARTMENT SANITARY 22+26.14 - CL R-1916 MH No. 2 MH No. 2 966.03 946.02 945.92 944.32 3001 20.11 400.00 8" PVC 0.40% APARTMENT SANITARY 19+81.71 - CL R-1733 MH No. 3 MH No. 3 967.67 944.32 944.22 942.70 3001 23.45 376.20 8" PVC 0.40% APARTMENT SANITARY 15+81.71 - CL R-1733 MH No. 4 MH No. 4 960.10 942.70 942.60 941.78 3001 17.50 205.51 8" PVC 0.40% APARTMENT SANITARY 12+05.51 - CL R-1916 MH No. 5 MH No. 5 962.00 941.78 931.40 DROP 30.60 APARTMENT SANITARY 10+00.00 - CL R-1733 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. MARK R WELCH DATE X/X/XX REG. NO. 42736 DATE: 6/3/2021 Prepared For: Baldur Real Estate, LLC 19356 MEADOW RIDGE TRAIL N MARINE ON ST. CROIX, MN 55047 FILE NO.: 20-408 LAYOUT 3 GP & CP 14070 Hwy 52 S.E. Chatfield, MN 55923 ENGINEERING SURVEYING PLANNING Ph. 507-867-1666 Fax 507-867-1665 www.ggg.to DESIGNED MRW DRAWN ADB CHECKED MRW REVISED RESUBMITTAL RESUBMITTAL RESUBMITTAL RESUBMITTAL FISHER - PUD DRIVE B618 C&G >2% ENTRANCE TYPICAL NOT TO SCALE a _ � 1.5" BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE 1.5" BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE 19.0' n.0% SECTION 38' 19.0' 0, 0% -� 6" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE B618 C&G >2% *SEE CVT'S GEOTECHNICAL REPORT DRIVEAISLE TYPICAL SECTION 24' NOT TO SCALE I i 2 4.0' i i 1.5" BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE 1.5" BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE F�" r A�'� 5 \SE *SEE CVT'S GEOTECHNICAL REPORT EAST B618 C&G 6' 12' THRU LANE I - ------------------- 4.0 � 2.0 PAVEMENT SECTION SHALL CONFORM TO PLT. NO. 5003 EDMONSON AVE NE TYPICAL SECTION BY ADB 0/18DATE CITY OF MONTICELLO` ADB 1/29/202 WiRlIGHT COUNTY ADB 12/6/2021 ADB 12/8/2022 BENCHMARK: ADB 2/14/2023 TOP NUT HYDRANT ON SCHOOL BOULEVARD 300' WEST OF THE INTERSECTION WITH EDMONSON AVENUE NE, ELEV:965.13 NOT TO SCALE nTONTICPi,i3O LAKE APA-lk"ITMENTS DOTES, TYPICAL. & SECTIONS SHEET 2 OF 15 SHEETS FDIAL ARNING o IGGING CALL GOPHER -�Ld E CALL FOR LOCATIONS. J z -800-252-1166 0 BY LAW z O -� �z ww W-1 O Q STA: 11 +51.72 OFF: CL WATERMAIN LOOP 2 / . 5 z 7 F&I WET -TAP 8" LINE INTO _ o_ LLJ EX 16" DIP MAIN \+ --- _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ I W-2 - - / 3( fi- ( MSI S `0 STA: 10+45.41 OFF: CL / 82.25 LF 1 RCP @ 1.00% / F&I 94.43 LF 5 ' P WATERMAIN LOOP 2 F&I 8" - 11.25° BEND W-3 / o, / DEVELOPMENT STA: 10+23.41 OFF: CL / N ©/ SIGN 10.'0 WATERMAIN LOOP 2 // °v / LIJ F&I 8X8 TEE / 4 / 8"X6" REDUCER 3' W / -12 6" GATE VALVE 20' W / Wv � I 6 HYDRANT 23 W BREAKOFF ELEV: 961.64 / o�°// <W-7 H 2 W-7 ----- (v N • • STA: 12+62.75 OFF: CL I/ WATERMAIN LOOP 4�S_/4 S 3 F&I 8"X8" CROSS 8" - 11.25° BEND 3' E 12.0' 8" - 11.25° BEND 2' W ---- •• 8" GATE VALVE - 3' N 8" GATE VALVE - 3' S 8" GATE VALVE - 3' W OF W BEND 7 �6 7s,, Y w W-12 < STA: 12+50.75 OFF: CL ,� o WATERMAIN LOOP o F&I 8" - 11.25° BEND S-3 w :2 ED z W-14 0 STA: 14+72.17 OFF: CL 0< WATERMAIN LOOP z F&I WET -TAP 8" LINE INTO w 0 EX 16" DIP MAIN I � V� E R T I N C A L S C A L E N HORIZONTAL SCALE 10 0 5 10 20 T 20.00 i ROAD CLOSURE REQUIRED. COORDINATE WITH CITY OF MONTICELLO. ALL EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE SAWCUT, REMOVED, AND w REINSTALLED TO THE EXISTING CONDITION OR BETTER TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE CITY. SEE CITY PLATE NO. X 7006. G GL 30 54.82 J0 0 \� r- c� r- c� F- 12+00 DATE: 6/3/2021 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED Prepared For: BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT IAM A DULY LICENSED Baldur Real Estate, LLC PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 19356 MEADOW RIDGE TRAIL N MARK R WELCH MARINE ON ST. CROIX, MN 55047 DATE X/X/XX REG. NO. 42736 FILE NO.: 20-408 LAYOUT 3 GP & CP 12+50 13+00 14070 Hwy 52 S.E. Chatfield, MN 55923 13+50 ENGINEERING DESIGNED SURVEYING DRAWN PLANNING Ph. 507-867-1666 CHECKED Fax 507-867-1665 www.ggg.to 14+00 MRW ADB MRW 14+50 970 965 1 955 w 15+00 15+22.15 II cu 0 \ o W-2 \ 10+4+ W-3 0 OUTLET #2 \ STA: 10+72.00 ELEV: 959.00 \ F&I 15" RCP APRON & \ 5.1 CY CLASS III RIPRAP PER PLATE 4009 yti � o pis 975 970 Nl•11 11101 955 STA: 10 ELEV: G-) = ROADrCLOSURE REQUIRED. 0 COOR I ATE WIT11 CITY OF MONTI LLO. ALL EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE C-) SAWCU , REMOVED, AND wz RE10' LLED TO THE >� EXISTIN3 CONDITION OR 0m BETTER TO THE 3: m SATISFACTION 0 THE L/) CITY. EE CITY LATE NO. m 7006.0 F_ I >D 064.�4 ILLJ o 11+00 w W-1 1A+67 F- I I � 0C/)<::�E� --i>m> J r �r�rl<�m uM _ -m�70 rD 0 H U) 0 zoo=mz I O70f MF11 C) z < n F- --Im I m 0UmD0 D2 g+�5 X P' j o cn = I 1 0 0? 2 m m I 15 r J -72'0 4% F_ 9+85 10+00 REVISED BY DATE CITY OF M WRIGHT COUNTY RESUBMITTAL ADB 0/18/202 RESUBMITTAL ADB 11/29/202 RESUBMITTAL ADB 12/6/2021 RESUBMITTAL ADB 12/8/2022 BENCHMARK: TOP NUT HYDRANT ON SCHOOL BOULEVARD 300' WEST OF THE INTERSECTION WITH EDMONSON AVENUE NE, ELEV:965.13 FISHER - PUD ADB 2/14/2023 FIELD VER EDMONSON R/W EXISTING AVE NE /M ELEVA W/M 15" HDPE F&I 8 DIP W/M PR ATE F&I 8 DIP W M PRIVATE UTI ITY STA: 11+51.72 ELEV: 953.17 00.00 53.68 7.5' MIN. STA:10+45.41 ELEV: 953.64 EXCAVATION 95-168 W/M 95-1.67 952.62 W/M 951151 951140 W/M 9511.29 953.17 ro r-00 O r O rn W N 000 rrj rn a_ 00-t N O Co W 00 �� r- c j 0) (000 W Ln Ln ca rn W Ln N c0 rn C0 a- PER CITY PLATE NO. 7006 MINIMUM 18 F&I 4" RIGID SEPARATION INSTALLATION STA:1 +72.17 ELEV 956.54 FIELD V RIFY F 18 DIP WM PRIVATE EXISTING 16" D.I.P. W/M ELEVATION W/M 95-/.07 95-/.05 W/M 95-/.02 956.99 W/M 95C.94 95E.89 W/M 95E.84 95E.78 W/M 95E.73 95E.68 W/M 95E.63 ca I� N O N 't r') c0 r ca Ln ro � Ln 07 Ln co 07 r -O Ln O Ln �p ca Ln c0 0� Ln O N Ln (-o cD I� Q6 co 00 Co rn co ,Ij rn Lo Co co0) �j 0� (0 Ln co co (0 ,sj rn CD (D co Co or) CD Ln rn co co cfl co 0) co 0) Cfl co cfl co M Ln rl co X w X w w X00� M M Xcl� M M X 0-)0,) X 0_)0_) X O7 0) X 0) w w w w w w w w w w w 12+00 DATE: 6/3/2021 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED Prepared For: BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT IAM A DULY LICENSED Baldur Real Estate, LLC PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 19356 MEADOW RIDGE TRAIL N MARK R WELCH MARINE ON ST. CROIX, MN 55047 DATE X/X/XX REG. NO. 42736 FILE NO.: 20-408 LAYOUT 3 GP & CP 12+50 13+00 14070 Hwy 52 S.E. Chatfield, MN 55923 13+50 ENGINEERING DESIGNED SURVEYING DRAWN PLANNING Ph. 507-867-1666 CHECKED Fax 507-867-1665 www.ggg.to 14+00 MRW ADB MRW 14+50 970 965 1 955 w 15+00 15+22.15 II cu 0 \ o W-2 \ 10+4+ W-3 0 OUTLET #2 \ STA: 10+72.00 ELEV: 959.00 \ F&I 15" RCP APRON & \ 5.1 CY CLASS III RIPRAP PER PLATE 4009 yti � o pis 975 970 Nl•11 11101 955 STA: 10 ELEV: G-) = ROADrCLOSURE REQUIRED. 0 COOR I ATE WIT11 CITY OF MONTI LLO. ALL EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE C-) SAWCU , REMOVED, AND wz RE10' LLED TO THE >� EXISTIN3 CONDITION OR 0m BETTER TO THE 3: m SATISFACTION 0 THE L/) CITY. EE CITY LATE NO. m 7006.0 F_ I >D 064.�4 ILLJ o 11+00 w W-1 1A+67 F- I I � 0C/)<::�E� --i>m> J r �r�rl<�m uM _ -m�70 rD 0 H U) 0 zoo=mz I O70f MF11 C) z < n F- --Im I m 0UmD0 D2 g+�5 X P' j o cn = I 1 0 0? 2 m m I 15 r J -72'0 4% F_ 975 970 Nl�71 one 0 FY D.I.P. TION 955 950 10+50 11+00 11+50 11+66.72 M0VTICLLLO LAKE AP""AR"ITMENTS PLAN & PIRIOFtLE H'012 U'1'1LITIES SHEET 3 9+85 10+00 REVISED BY DATE CITY OF M WRIGHT COUNTY RESUBMITTAL ADB 0/18/202 RESUBMITTAL ADB 11/29/202 RESUBMITTAL ADB 12/6/2021 RESUBMITTAL ADB 12/8/2022 BENCHMARK: TOP NUT HYDRANT ON SCHOOL BOULEVARD 300' WEST OF THE INTERSECTION WITH EDMONSON AVENUE NE, ELEV:965.13 FISHER - PUD ADB 2/14/2023 FIELD VER EXISTING 12" /M ELEVA W/M F&I 8 DIP W/M PR ATE F&I 8 DIP W M PRIVATE STA: 11+51.72 ELEV: 953.17 00.00 53.68 STA: 10+23.41 ELEV: STA:10+45.41 ELEV: 953.64 95-168 W/M 95-1.67 952.62 W/M 951151 951140 W/M 9511.29 953.17 ro r-00 O r O rn W N 000 rrj rn a_ 00-t N O Co W 00 �� r- c j 0) (000 W Ln Ln ca rn W Ln N c0 rn C0 a- O X C0 w 0_ X w w 975 970 Nl�71 one 0 FY D.I.P. TION 955 950 10+50 11+00 11+50 11+66.72 M0VTICLLLO LAKE AP""AR"ITMENTS PLAN & PIRIOFtLE H'012 U'1'1LITIES SHEET 3 9+85 10+00 REVISED BY DATE CITY OF M WRIGHT COUNTY RESUBMITTAL ADB 0/18/202 RESUBMITTAL ADB 11/29/202 RESUBMITTAL ADB 12/6/2021 RESUBMITTAL ADB 12/8/2022 BENCHMARK: TOP NUT HYDRANT ON SCHOOL BOULEVARD 300' WEST OF THE INTERSECTION WITH EDMONSON AVENUE NE, ELEV:965.13 FISHER - PUD ADB 2/14/2023 975 970 Nl�71 one 0 FY D.I.P. TION 955 950 10+50 11+00 11+50 11+66.72 M0VTICLLLO LAKE AP""AR"ITMENTS PLAN & PIRIOFtLE H'012 U'1'1LITIES SHEET 3 �0�-cnD-wmv701- GL GL GL BEFORE DIGGING CALL GOPHER �� 000 O GL o STATE ONE CALL FOR LOCATIONS. N c� REQUIRED BY LAW o F O / 0 GL GL 7- �J1 1 �E Sl- u -N T 131 u PN I A v T 1 0 O �° �Bl X11 E1 °1B 1 -� ��l 711 F&I 20 LF 8" PVC Ca? 0.40% �Bl0/�/ c� F- 6' CONCRETE SIDEWHL�CBHAO � ' 12+ �1 +00 v> 0 ]HAOBHAO BH BHAO BHAO � *0 g g. ° � � � ° N -- - ------------------------- ------ ---------- K LOT 1, �T���° BERM° / // / 3 6.2° �F $ / z O F 8c 14� °° / cc):)) /=o Q o / / ° / � O NN o w ' / 0 O / SANITARY SEWER CONNECTION WILL o Z v J + 0 Q w o 0 ,,�� / ° ^`� �� / �° .�� / REQUIRE OPEN BOULEVARD. CUT OF SCHOOL DEPTH IS GREATER THAN 20 J a w / / V) J w o cn w L� �i o_ c), �° - 0 / �� ° / FEET WHICH COMPLIANCE WILL REQUIRE BOXING ANDLLJ WITH OSHA SLOPING Q _ l^ J �� / �� / / O �° / / STANDARDS. 40 FEET IN ALL IMPACTED AREA IS LIKELY DIRECTIONS OF THE MANHOLE. SEE CITY PLATE NO. 7006. O) LLJ LLJ i (�� O / cn z Q Li W-2 W-3 W-4 W-5 STA: 10+45.41 OFF: CL STA: 10+21-5.41 OFF: CL STA: 15+ 5.36 OFF: 11.00' L STA: 15+85.09 OFF: 11 49' L WATERMAIN LOOP 2 APARTMENT SANITARY APARTME T SANITARY APARTMENT SANITARY F&I 8" - 11.25° BEND F&I 8"x8" TEE F&I 8"x8" TEE F&I 8" 45° BEND 965 CVT SB#2 STA:15+08.39 8"x6" RED 6" GATE CER 3 0' W' 8" GATE VALVE 3' W � YDRA T 23' W BREAKOFF ELEV: 961.64 CVT SB#1 STA: 10+96.92 -- 7.5' MIN. _ 960 H 4 - PLT. NC. 3001 STORM TA:12+05.51 0 F:0.00'T Apartment Sanitary STORM IM: 960.10 STA:1 +65.36BUILD: 17.50 ELEV: 958.58 &I 8 DIP W M 8" INV IN: 942 70 955 STA: 15+00.00 ELEV: 95 .37 STA: 14+09.11 ELEV: 953.71 950 MH 5 - PLT. NO. 3002 STA:10+00.00 FF:0.00'T Apartment San tary SOUTH APA TMENT SERVICES RIM: 962.00 STA: 15+54. 6 0 BUILD: 30.60 ELEV: 944.11 N 8" INV IN: 9 1.78 "945 E 12" INV OUT: 931.40 0% PRIVATE F&I 76.20 LF 8 PV SDR 26 @ 0. 958.94 95E.08 95 .22 F&I 205.51 LF 8 PVC SD 26 ® 0.40% (PUBLIC 94 .19 94 .09 SAN SAN 94 .99 vv E R 940 1, C A L- S C A L E N kH 935 HORIZONTAL SCALE CONNECT MH -6 TO ,o a 5 ,o Zo EX. 2" RCP SANITARY SEWER LINE PER PLT. NO. 3002 95C.36 W/M 955.64 954.91 W/M 952-.18 94 .89 SAN 94 .79 94 .69 SAN 94 .59 94 .49 SAN 94--1.38 94--1.28 SAN 94 .18 94--1.08 SAN 94198 94188 SAN 94178 94158 SAN 94148 94138 SAN 94128 942. 18 SAN 94108 941.98 SAN 941.88 9 0 SAN CO O I� � N N 00 CO 00 co M O Ln N � Ln N 00 (.0 � � O O 0-) O C� � � � � CO 00 O 0) -j-00 07 n O c0 c.0 Ln CO N d7 [I -CD � O0 -t� O O nc0 Dao n� r1- N nN 00 ON nL 0)O O 0) MCO I� CO co rj CO (Dc0 0) rj c0 CO c� nc0 c0 c� � O d7 c0 O N O CD p c0 c0 Oj -;t O CD c))n Ln co pj N CD �j X W 0� B_ X W B_ CO 07 C0 07 X O CO D7 CO X 0) (.0 D7 CO 0) O X 07 (0 lY CO CT) X 0) (Y Cp D7 CO X M lY CO d7 CO X CO W CO 0) X 0) 0 D-' CO O X00� M 0 CO 0 X O Ln (D X 0 X W W W 11 W a_ W 11 W a- W W W a_ W a_ W a_ W W 15+50 15+00 14+50 14+00 13+50 13+00 12+50 12+00 11+50 11+00 10+50 10+00 9+75 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, DATE: 6/3/2021 Prepared For: REVISED BY DATE CITYOF MONTICELLO MONTICELLO L APARTMENTS SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED Ba dur Real Estate, LLC ENGINEERING SURVEYING DESIGNED MRW RESUBMITTAL ADB 0/18/202 1 Q� RESUBMITTAL ADB11/29/202'W��GHT PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF � O O DRAWN ADB COUNTY �(, PJQL�IOFtLE Fnulk�" UTILITIES RESUBMITTAL ADB 12/6/2021 THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 19356 MEADOW RIDGE TRAIL N PLANNING MARK R WELCH MARINE ON ST. CROIX, MN 55047 4070 Hwy 52 S.E. Ph. 5078671666 Fax 507-867-1665 CHECKED MRWBENCHMARK: RESUBMITTAL ADB 12/8/2022 SHEET T 4 DATE x/x/xx REG. NO. 42736 FILE NO.: 20-408 LAYOUT 3 GP & CP Chatfield, MN 55923 WwW.ggg TOP NUT HYDRANT ON SCHOOL BOULEVARD 300' WEST OF THE INTERSECTION WITH EDMONSON AVENUE NE, ELEV:965.13 OF 15 SHEETS FISHER - PUD ADB 2 14 2023 / / WARNI -------____ y 1 BEFORE DIGGING CALL GOPHER / / L>_1 - - - - STATE ONE CALL FOR LOCATIONS. _ _ _ DIAL - 1-800-252-1166 / REQUIRED BY LAW / -i LLJ BERM -------____ w - I I I I I I I _ N I I I I I I > 0-) I I I z 0 s• WV WV ..' 0-) I N N 00 p� I \ I = F&I 400.00 LF 8" PVC @ 0.40 _ - ----------- �19+000 19 00CD 18+00 17+00 16+0 gods 6� ' N 0 \ \ O -- 6b �z C=jgj W-4 W-5 W-7 W-12 STA: 15+65.3 OFF:11.00' STA: 15+85.0 OFF: 11.49' STA: 12+62.75 OFF: CL STA: 12+50.7 OFF: CL APARTMENT!SANITARY APARTMENT(SANITARY WATERMAIN LOOP WATERMAIN L.00P F&I 8"X8" TEE F&I 8" - 45 BEND F&I 8"X8" CROSS F&I 8" - 11.25° BEND 8" GATE VALVE 3' W 8" - 11.25° 3END 3' E 8 PLUG 55 W - - STA:16+13.8 OFF:11.00' R 8" GATE VALVE 3' N CVT SB#4 STA: 3+31.28 CVT SB#3 ST :19+67.86 F&I 8" - 45 BEND 8" GATE VALVE 3' W OF BEND 7. 5' MIN. 965 CVT SB#2 7.5' MIN. 24 RCP 15 DPE 15" HDPE F&I 4" RIGID O F&I 4" RIGID W �PR 18 DI W M PRIVATE F 14" RIGI F&I 8 �I STA:18 58.54 STALLATI ELEV: 59.73 MINI UM 18" STA: 16+13.85 SEPARATION a ELEV: 959.47 STA: 15+85.09 STA: 1 E +65.36 E ELEV: 959.29 ELEV: 58.58 STA: 20+55.91 MH 2 - PLT. NO. 3001 ELEV: 957.49 MINIMU 18" STA: 9+81.71 OFF: 0. 0'T I " MH 3 - PLT. 0. 3001 SEPAR ION N Apartment Sanitary a 1.71 0.0'T = RIM: 66.03 L Apartmen8t Sanitary LOWER W/M TO BUILD: 20.11 S RIM: 967.67 CLEAR STORM PIPE W 8 INV IN:946.02 A BUILD: 23.45 STA: 20+06.01 S 8„D INV OUT: 945.92 L N 8" INV IN: 944.32 ELE : 955.61 E " S 8" INV OUT: 944.22 950 HORIZONTAL SCALE 10 0 5 10 20 244.43 LF 8 PVC SDR 26 C�? 0.40 P IVATE SOUTH APARTMENT S STA: 15+54. 6 CLUBHOUSE SEF STA: 20 VICES 59.22 ELEV: 944.11 F&I 400.00 LT 8 PVC SDR 26 @0.40 PRI ATE ELEV: 46.33 95 .07 W/M 95 .86 95 .65 W/M 95 .27 95 .32 W/M 95 .90 95 .12 W/M 95 .68 95 .24 W/M 95 .80 95 .36 W/M 95 .72 95 .70 W/M 95 .67 w/M 95164 95 .62 W/M 95 .59 95 .56 w/M 95 .53 95 .51 w/M 95 .48 95 .38 w/M 95E.94 95 .08 W/M 95-/.22 94 .59 SAN 94 .49 94 .39 SAN 94 .29 94 .19 SAN 94 .09 94 .89 SAN 94 .79 94 .69 SAN 94 .59 94 .49 SAN 94 .39 94 .29 SAN 94 .19 SAN 94 .09 94 .99 SAN 94 .89 94 .79 SAN 94 .69 94 .59 SAN 941* 4 .49 94 .39 SAN 942-.19 4 941* .09 SAN 94 .99 LO- 0-) N r�Ln 't CON � I� N Ln 00 00 O U-) r- 0)n O -t 00 co 0-)N 00 N r- M 0-) O 0 �N -t N O NN N O 00N 0 0 O r� 1`0 co -t 0 r- NN � COCO � O � � O � N � O � N � O � I� � O N N O O � CO COO � 00 � O � 00 � O � 00 O `� � 17 O � � CO O �j O O O CO O O co co co O co co co O O 00 c0 O 00 cc) CO 4 00 co C0 00 CO C0 00 co co 4 00 co co co CO rrj co COO 0 O COO O O OO O O OCO O O OO O O OO O O OCO co O� (D O O OO 0) O OO O O co (0 O O Co C0 O CD OO X O_ X� O�� X O_ �� X O_ O�� X O_ O�� X O_ O�� X 0 X O_ �� X �� X Li W W a_ W a_ W a_ W a_ W 0- W a_ W a_ W a_ W a_ W O 21+00 20+50 20+00 19+50 19+00 18+50 18+00 17+50 17+00 16+50 16+00 15+50 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, DATE: 6/3/2021 Prepared Far: REVISED BY DATE CITY O MONTICELLO M CELL 0 L KE P�TSPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED Badur Real Estate, LLC ENGINEERING SURVEYING DESIGNED MRW RESUBMITTAL ADB 0/18/202 WRIGHT COUNTY Q� 1 RESUBMITTAL ADB 1/29/202 PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF � O O DRAWN ADB �J1 �y P LAN �(, PJR,0FILE FO-IR" UTILITIES RESUBMITTAL ADB 12/6/2021 THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 19356 MEADOW RIDGE TRAIL N PLANNING MARK R WELCH MARINE ON ST. CROIX, MN 55047 4070 Hwy 52 S.E. Ph. 5078671666 Fax 507-867-1665 CHECKED MRW 1 1 RESUBMITTAL ADB 12/8/2022 BENCHMARK: SHEET DATE x/x/xx REG. NO. 42736 Chatfield, MN 55923 WwW.ggg.to TOP NUT HYDRANT ON SCHOOL BOULEVARD 300' WEST OF OF 15 SHEETS FISHER - PUD ADB 2 14 2023 / / FILE NO.: 20-408 LAYOUT 3 GP & CP THE INTERSECTION WITH EDMONSON AVENUE NE, ELEV:965.13 WARNING BEFORE DIGGING CALL GOPHER STATE ONE CALL FOR LOCATIONS. DIAL - 1-800-252-1166 REQUIRED BY LAW W-7 STA: 12+62.75 OFF: CL WATERMAIN LOOP F&I 8"X8" CROSS 8" - 11.25° BEND 3' E 8" - 11.25' BEND 2' W 8" GATE VALVE 3' N 8" GATE VALVE 3' S 8" GATE VALVE 3' W OF W BEND W-8 STA: 21 +33.68 OFF: 11.00'R APARTMENT SANITARY F&I 8"X6" TEE 6" GATE VALVE 4' N 6" HYDRANT 7' N BREAKOFF ELEV: 967.06 W-9 STA: 21 +84.11 OFF: 11.00'R APARTMENT SANITARY F&I 8" - 45° BEND Ll v, ^ �o V- Ll El II �� I rem IIA I�. I . i i�li�liinnlu��u aliin�IrRuw�uu ul�u�lueuiiu�� L; UVIC II V�J c L I R L- i- * 9 7.5 -------- C13 3 LOT 1 BLOCK 1 i \ 9 sp ce Ay W-9 \ 3 I \F&I J§1 LF 15" HDPE @FJ.162% 4.43 LF 8" PVC -Q-0- ,+ 22 u0 -----------21-+9-0-------------- F&I 121.36 LF 4 RCP @ 0.49% W-10 r W-11 11.00' ,% 90 LF & U ' F8c1 g, ' / 6.3, o r--- I THE PRESERVES 54'-S6LMP'MIN. I I I I I I I I i W-10 STA:12+96.46 OFF:11.00'R STORM MAIN F&I 8" - 22.5° BEND W-11 STA: 13+ 21.31 OFF:11.00' R STORM MAIN F&I 8"X8" TEE 8"X6" REDUCER 54' W 8" GATE VALVE 3' N 6" GATE VALVE 57' W 6" HYDRANT 60' W BREAKOFF ELEV: 961.32 W-12 STA: 12+50.75 OFF: CL WATERM AI N LOOP F&I 8" - 11.25° BEND I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, DATE: 6/3/2021 SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED Prepared For: BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED Baldur Real Estate, LLC PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 19356 MEADOW RIDGE TRAIL N MARK R WELCH MARINE ON ST. CROIX, MN 55047 DATE X/X/XX REG. NO. 42736 FILE NO.: 20-408 LAYOUT 3 GP & CP 970 ti• BASEMENT ELEV: 962 955 950 945 9.50 O O 00 O O CD ADB O DO O O 00 O O O M O 00 S 8" 000 O O C(7 ENGINEERING 000 SURVEYING N OD N u� 6 N O CD 21+50 W W W..tO (-O(D 0') o-) X O Q) a X 0) (0 W 0) (.0 O o') W a- 22+76.14 C-)0-) 22+50 14070 Hwy 52 S.E. Chatfield, MN 55923 MINIMUM 18" SEPARATION LSTA 21+84.11 MH 1 - PLT. N0. 3001 ELE :958.57 Apartment So itary RIM: 968.66 BUILD: 21.66 E 8" INV OUT: 947.00 •,C e CD O O 00 O O CD ADB O DO O O CO O O O W 8" O X N I� S 8" W O 22+00 0) ENGINEERING O SURVEYING 0_ PLANNING N u� Ph. 507-867-1666 a_ Fax 507-867-1665 21+50 W W W..tO O Lc) 951.49 W/M 951.28 94 .79 SAN 94 .69 DRAWN CHECKED ADB MRW F&I 244. �cgti! �' Tic• y O� �, G' 90 7.5' MIN. STA' 20+ 5.91 ELEV: 9517.49 8" PVC SDR 26 @ 0.40% P KIVATE CLUBHOUSE SEF VICES STA:204 59.22 ELEV: 46.33 / 82.25 LF 1 RCP @ 1.00% 11+c / //K'/&0 / / o / / @ / 77 � // / p• / J �o - `�' 20+0o �S�-/4 0 0 CVT SU4 STA:Ip3+31.28 24" RCP F&I 4" RIGI STALLATI( ---MINIMU 18"-] SEPAR ION N LOWER W/ TO CLEAR STORM PIPE STA: 20+06.01 --„ ELEV: 955.61 7 • 0 0 •+ s 3 12.0' CVT SB3 ST :19+67.86 77- .15" HDI F&I 4" RIG MIN1"1181 J SEP RATION MH 2 - PLT. NO. 3001 STA: 9+81.71 OFF: 0. L0 O 0(-0 ADB 00 r - O N L6 (6 W 8" INV IN: 946.02 N I� S 8" CD O O 0) 0-)0') O X 0_ O N u� W a_ O O 21+50 O O Lc) DESIGNED MRW DRAWN CHECKED ADB MRW F&I 244. �cgti! �' Tic• y O� �, G' 90 7.5' MIN. STA' 20+ 5.91 ELEV: 9517.49 8" PVC SDR 26 @ 0.40% P KIVATE CLUBHOUSE SEF VICES STA:204 59.22 ELEV: 46.33 / 82.25 LF 1 RCP @ 1.00% 11+c / //K'/&0 / / o / / @ / 77 � // / p• / J �o - `�' 20+0o �S�-/4 0 0 CVT SU4 STA:Ip3+31.28 24" RCP F&I 4" RIGI STALLATI( ---MINIMU 18"-] SEPAR ION N LOWER W/ TO CLEAR STORM PIPE STA: 20+06.01 --„ ELEV: 955.61 7 • 0 0 •+ s 3 12.0' CVT SB3 ST :19+67.86 77- .15" HDI F&I 4" RIG MIN1"1181 J SEP RATION MH 2 - PLT. NO. 3001 STA: 9+81.71 OFF: 0. 0'T Apar ment Sanitary ADB RIM: 66.03 ADB BUILE: 20.11 r- r� W 8" INV IN: 946.02 N I� S 8" INV OUT: 945.9 I^ 95 .07 W/M 95 .86 95 .65 W/M 95 .27 95q.32 W/M 95 .90 95 .12 W/M 95 .68 94 .59 SAN 94 .49 94J.39 SAN 94129 946.19 SAN 94 .09 94 .89 SAN 94 .79 REVISED BY DATE CITY O MONTICELLO COUNTY RESUBMITTAL ADB 0/18/202 RESUBMITTAL ADB Lc) "t r- r- r� Ln CD N I� n L(-) 00 co I^ r" 00 O O N L6 O N u� O �j O O O 6(.0 O O Lc) O O CD (0 O O CD co 0) 0) (0 (0 0) 0) (.0 O o') o-)O O O O C-)0-) X O� O X D O X O_ O O X O_ W a- W a_ W 0_ W a_ 21 +00 20+50 20+00 19+50 REVISED BY DATE CITY O MONTICELLO COUNTY RESUBMITTAL ADB 0/18/202 RESUBMITTAL ADB 11/29/202'WRIGHT RESUBMITTAL ADB 12/6/2021 RESUBMITTAL ADB 12/8/2022 BENCHMARK: TOP NUT HYDRANT ON SCHOOL BOULEVARD 300' WEST OF THE INTERSECTION WITH EDMONSON AVENUE NE, ELEV:965.13 FISHER - PUD ADB 2/14/2023 95 .24 W/M 94 .69 SAN O Ln Lr) O O O O O V a E R T 1a C A L- S 0 C A L E N HORIZONTAL SCALE 10 0 5 10 20 MOVTICLLLO LAKE APA'--'TMENTS PLAN & PJQLLOFtLE H'012 U'1'1LITIES SHEET 6 F ARM G DIGGING AL G PER E CALL 0 L C TIONS. —800-2 2— 1BY LAW 17I W-7 BY DATE STA: 12+62.75 OFF: CL WATERMAIN LOOP RESUBMITTAL F&I 8"X8" CROSS 11/29/202 8" - 11.25° BEND 3' E 8" - 11.25° BEND 2' W 8" GATE VALVE 3' N 8" GATE VALVE 3' S 8" GATE VALVE 3' W OF W BEND °°z 00 o a- OQV o Q p � rn Of L d =LLI U W Z z r- CD z H- c� - 9 / 9+50 0+00 I 0 00 O z zoo O 0 oaf c� by �Qo�rn m Lu = w0wz / 0 L`wQ Z mH-cD F&I 110 1 @ 0.40W � I �- • W-12 STA: 12+50.75 OFF: CL WATERMAIN LOOP F&I 8" - 11.25° BEND W-13 STA:10+00.00 OFF: CL WATERMAIN LOOP F&I 8" - 90° BEND 8"X6" REDUCER 2' W 6" GATE VALVE 5' W 6" HYDRANT 8' W BREAKOFF ELEV:968.23 DATE: 6/3/2021 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED Prepared For: BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED Baldur Real Estate, LLC PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 19356 MEADOW RIDGE TRAIL N MARK R WELCH MARINE ON ST. CROIX, MN 55047 DATE X/X/XX REG. NO. 42736 FILE NO.: 20-408 LAYOUT 3 GP & CP 975 970 ••9 Ln Q0 X LLI BERM L � 9 of I I I � I I I I �CD I o - I � I >� I I w I I I I I I I � I I O I o I @ I � I I � I I LL I I L I N I I 00 I 12+001 I I N 3 = I I I S DJdS Z I Cp 17 HDPE @ 0-5U70 3 \ \ ®� LF \ F&I 162.84 LF 15 0 \\ 0 \ \ \ (1 I POOL I Tr T- V LCA O cis O o � J V) ^Q) 9+50 10+00 14070 Hwy 52 S.E. Chatfield, MN 55923 ENGINEERING SURVEYING PLANNING Ph. 507-867-1666 Fax 507-867-1665 www.ggg.to 10+50 DESIGNED DRAWN CHECKED 11+00 MRW ADB MRW 11+50 12+00 12+50 REVISED BY DATE CITY (Off Mu"'NTICELL U WRIGHT COUNTY RESUBMITTAL ADB 0/18/202 RESUBMITTAL ADB 11/29/202 RESUBMITTAL ADB 12/6/2021 RESUBMITTAL ADB 12/8/2022 BENCHMARK: TOP NUT HYDRANT ON SCHOOL BOULEVARD 300' WEST OF THE INTERSECTION WITH EDMONSON AVENUE NE, ELEV:965.13 FISHER — PUD ADB 2/14/2023 7.5' MIN. 15" HDPE STA: 10+00.00 ELEV:958.26 �i W/M 95E.26 95E.64 W/M 958.27 F&I 8 DIP W 95-/.97 PRIVATE W/M 95-/.67 95-/.37 W/M 95-/.07 MINIMUM 18 SEPARATIONINSTALLATION F&I 4" RIGID W/M 958.87 STA: 10+44.65 ELEV: 958.93 958.57 95-/.05 W/M 95-/.02 956.99 W/M 95E.94 O N (D r� co Lj OO 0_ r 7rq O cD co M O X LLI O cc) N O Lc� 0) OO O r-- r-) Ln co O O X LLI N Ln SCO co L6 m OO c O 0_ O co N Ln � O X LLI O O CD O O Lj m cDO (Y 0-) a_ O -t � Ln cD c0 O X LLI co � 00N co co LO OO (Y O a_ co � N Ln CO c0 O� X LLI N O 0\1 I'Dc0 c0 L6 d7 (Y O a- N-) Ln O O 0 X LL1 � c0 ( coO O a- I� O L LfJ Ln O X L -J co a- 9+50 10+00 14070 Hwy 52 S.E. Chatfield, MN 55923 ENGINEERING SURVEYING PLANNING Ph. 507-867-1666 Fax 507-867-1665 www.ggg.to 10+50 DESIGNED DRAWN CHECKED 11+00 MRW ADB MRW 11+50 12+00 12+50 REVISED BY DATE CITY (Off Mu"'NTICELL U WRIGHT COUNTY RESUBMITTAL ADB 0/18/202 RESUBMITTAL ADB 11/29/202 RESUBMITTAL ADB 12/6/2021 RESUBMITTAL ADB 12/8/2022 BENCHMARK: TOP NUT HYDRANT ON SCHOOL BOULEVARD 300' WEST OF THE INTERSECTION WITH EDMONSON AVENUE NE, ELEV:965.13 FISHER — PUD ADB 2/14/2023 13+00 W 40 • V� E R T I a C A L S C A L E a HORIZONTAL SCALE 10 0 s 10 20 M0NTICELLO LAKE APARTMENTS PLAN & PROFILE FOR UTILITIES SHEET 7 ARNING �� ��X I _ IGGING CALL GOPHER \ I !II J I E CALL FOR LOCATIONS. FDIAL I 11= Q I -800-252-1166 BY LAW I I � o I I w z I � I II � f z I z w � � 220.77 F 5HDPE 1.80 1" % 13+00 \ I 1 14+00 �j �' r 2 3 \ �\ I 14+97 - ------- A 0 � 9+75 �i - - F&I 94.43 LF 5I CD / F C 3 RC -_-- 19 00 CB 3 o � I / _-- �E�ELO � 00 ,� F&I 400.00 LF 8 PVC @ 0.40% AM nM L / • vI I @2' / �Q - 54.8 I © / I 12 •• � co O I � ' N // J � / VA 3 co �o S .. I L-1 0 C I c I w z w I w w O @2 4F 1. &\c I S-3 I z w I ___ I I @cif o I _ I 980W-7 980 W-12 V a STA: 12+62.75 OFF: CL STA: 12+50. 5 OFF: CL R WATERMAIN LOOP WATERMAIN LOOP I N F&I 8"X8" MOSS F&I 8" - 11 25° BEND A 8" - 11.25` BEND 3' E L 975 ,gyp _ . MH S-4 - PLT NO. 4001 so 9 5 8 GATE VALVE 3 N STA:12+51.64 FF: 0.00'T CB 5 - TYPE MH (48") A CB 3 - TYPE CB (48") CB ED1 - PLT. N0. 4002 8" GATE VALVE 3' S Storm Basins RIM: 965.32 STA:12+18.91 FF: 0.00'T E N STA: 11+76.67 FF:0.00'T STA: 10+00.00 FF:0.00'T 8" GATE VALVE 3' W OF BUILD: 7.35 Storm Basins GRATE: 965.78 xoi rrTaLscaiE Storm Basins GRATE: 966.02 Storm Basins W BEND S INV IN: 959.03 SE INV IN: 959.2 BUILD: 7.67 '0 ° 0 5 '0 20 BUILD: 7.75 R/W GRATE: 966.41 BUILD: 4.00 NE INV IN:957. 7 NE SW INV IN:958. INV OUT:95 0 .10 N INV IN:958. E INV IN:960.65 5 W INV OUT: 962.41 970 V INV OUT: 970 MH S-2 - TYPE 4 MH (48') STA: 14+72. 1 OFF: 0.00'T Storm Basins MH S-1 PLT. NO. 4001 RIM: 96 S :10+94.43 OFF:0.00'T 965 NBUILD: 3.rlo59 orm a Ins 965 (/) IM: 964.9 LJ BUILD: 3.49 E INV IN: 61�/A3__LF1 " F&I 220.77 m 'o ), 4.1 INV .q 0% (PUBLIC) LF 15" HDPE ® 1.80% (PRIVATE) m m U m U R p p 1.00% (PUBLIC) 2 U 960 960 RCP ® 0.40% (Pu LC) RCP @ 0.40% (PUBLIC) MIN p p 0. 0% (PUBLIC) MINIMUM 18" SE SEPARATION 8" D.I.P. " MINIM M W/M D.I.P. S F ATION F&I 4" RIGID &I 4" RIGID W/M I STALLATION I STALLATION STO 96160 962.15 STO 961.70 961.25 STO 96C.80 96C.35 STO 95 .90 95 .45 STO 95-/.97 95E.08 STO 958.18 95E.27 0 95 .18 958.27 STO 960.92 961.17 STO 96'. 41 961.66 STO 96'. 91 96 .16 STO 961.41 955 t� ro K) O CD O Ln cD L� O O O O O O (0 r7 cD r7 I� I_ T) r- � O r_ r- � � N � N LO N N N Ln N Ln N N Ln COco 0 CO CD 0 cD 0 co CO O O � O c0 LO O Ln Ln � � 0 n L6 LCj iCj iCj iCj cD di L O O di Lf j � L6 Lf) CD C0 CO C6 CO L6 cD CO cD CO 44 cD c0 Lo co CD ffj L6 cD c0 L6 0 cD co L.(7 cD (0 U-) c0 c0 Lfj Ln c0 (D Lfj U-) co CO Ln CO c0 Lrj U-) c0 c0 CO CO O 0) O� CD CO 0) a) CD CD a7 0) CD CD M CD LO a7 M CO CD M CD CO 0) CD CO 0) CO CO M CD CO M CD CO CD CO 6) X n_ 0)0) X O M X M M X O M X 0)0) X 0) 0) X 0- M M X M0) X �� X O� X 0)0) X X W n W 0_ W 0_ W 0_ W 0_ W 0_ W a- W n W n W n W 0_ W n W 14+50 14+00 13+50 13+00 12+50 12+00 12+00 11+50 11+00 10+50 10+00 9+75 14+97.41 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, DATE: 6/3/2021 Prepared Far:ENGINEERING�JJJLV��VV�J REVISED BY DATE T �4 CITY OF MO�\ S TI�l ELLO M� I C E LLO NT LAKE APAR"I'MENTS SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED Ba dur Real Estate, LLC SURVEYING DESIGNED MRW RESUBMITTAL ADB 0/18/202 WRIGHT COUNTY 1 Q� 1G�nu RESUBMITTAL ADB 1/29/202 PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 19356 MEADOW RIDGE TRAIL N � O O PLANNING DRAWN ADB JL JL (�(, PJR1OFtLE T � UTILITIES RESUBMITTAL ADB 12/6/2021 MARK R WELCH MARINE ON ST. CROIX, MN 55047 4070 Hwy 52 S.E. Ph. 5078671666 Fax 507-867-1665 CHECKED MRW RESUBMITTAL ADB 12/8/2022 BENCHMARK: SHEET T 8 DATE x/x/xx REG. NO. 42736 Chatfield, MN 55923 www.gggI TOP NUT HYDRANT ON SCHOOL BOULEVARD 300' WEST OF OF 15 SHEETS FISHER - PUD ADB 2 14 2023 / / FILE NO.: 20-408 LAYOUT 3 GP & CP THE INTERSECTION WITH EDMONSON AVENUE NE, ELEV:965.13 WARNING BEFORE DIGGING CALL GOPHER STATE ONE CALL FOR LOCATIONS. DIAL — 1-800-252-1166 REQUIRED BY LAW W-7 REVISED BY STA: 12+62.75 OFF: CL WATERMAIN LOOP CB 2 — TYPE F&I 8"X8" CROSS ADB 8" — 11.25° BEND 3' E 8" — 11.25° BEND 2' W 8" GATE VALVE 3' N 8" GATE VALVE 3' S 8" GATE VALVE 3' W OF W BEND WV W-12 STA: 12+50.75 OFF: CL WATERMAIN LOOP F&I 8" — 11.25° BEND W-13 STA: 10+00.00 OFF: CL WATERMAIN LOOP F&I 8" — 90° BEND 8"X6" REDUCER 2' W 6" GATE VALVE 5' W 6" HYDRANT 8' W BREAKOFF ELEV:968.23 DATE: 6/3/2021 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED Prepared For: BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED Baldur Real Estate, LLC PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 19356 MEADOW RIDGE TRAIL N MARK R WELCH MARINE ON ST. CROIX, MN 55047 DATE X/X/XX REG. NO. 42736 FILE NO.: 20-408 LAYOUT 3 GP & CP -, — — — — — — — — — — — — — ----- — ------ ------------------------------------- Ln 6 - BERM I I BERM I 0) 1 I L. I w I I a- 0 I 0- -i >� I I w I I I I I I � I I 00 O z 00 � O Q O O U CV O — Q Qpm 0-) I � W = � W0 UJ z 1 — � — — — — — —F — — — O �Li � Oin I ' /I co O z z oa o o OQ� I < 7D M I m F-- > 1 wUL z / 1 ``wQ I 9+75 10 c 02 O 0 I F&I 110 I Cb.40 I I I � `J CO I . 6.3' 6.0' o� f 975 970 965 ••11 O Ln O 07 X W ZA lftIOQ62.84 LF 15" HDPE Q 0.5076I POOL l 0 O 1 1 p � I � I I L I I LLn REVISED BY DATE CITY OF N T I C E LL WRIGHT COUNTY RESUBMITTAL ADB CB 2 — TYPE 4 CB (48") ADB 11/29/202 RESUBMITTAL CB 3 — TYPE 4 CB (48") RESUBMITTAL ADB I BENCHMARK: TOP NUT HYDRANT ON SCHOOL BOULEVARD 300' WEST OF THE INTERSECTION WITH EDMONSON AVENUE NE, ELEV:965.13 FISHER — PUD ADB I 00 STA: 11 +41.61 FF: 0.00'T WV FF: 0.00'T WV North Bld Trench N Storm Basins I N I GRATE: 967.86 3 = I I i 13+29 ;CAI©��F\� 9+75 10+00 10+50 ENGINEERING DESIGNED O O SURVEYING DRAWN PLANNING Ph. 507-867-1666 CHECKED 14070 Hwy 52 S.E. Fax 507-8671665 Chatfield, MN 55923 WWW. .to 11+00 MRW ADB MRW 11+50 12+00 12+50 REVISED BY DATE CITY OF N T I C E LL WRIGHT COUNTY RESUBMITTAL ADB CB 2 — TYPE 4 CB (48") ADB 11/29/202 RESUBMITTAL CB 3 — TYPE 4 CB (48") RESUBMITTAL ADB 12/8/2022 BENCHMARK: TOP NUT HYDRANT ON SCHOOL BOULEVARD 300' WEST OF THE INTERSECTION WITH EDMONSON AVENUE NE, ELEV:965.13 FISHER — PUD ADB 2/14/2023 STA: 11 +41.61 FF: 0.00'T STA: 11 +76.67 FF: 0.00'T North Bld Trench Drain Storm Basins GRATE: 967.86 GRATE: 966.02 BUILD: 8.28 N INV IN:959.55 S INV OUT: 959 56 BUILD: 7.75 N INV IN:958.7 E INV IN: 960.6 SW INV OUT:95 . N m U M m TRENCH DRAIN F&I 110.79 LF 15" HDPE ® 0.40% PRIVATE 50% (—PRIVATE) 95 .92 STO 95 .82 95 .73 STO 95163 95152 STO 95 .39 95127 STO 959.15 95102 STO 958.90 958.77 (D rn N Ln CD LD 0) M X W DO O 0) LD M O O 00 DO Ln O CD 0) X� W 0-) (D Ln LD 0) LD O a_ N �D 1-0 CD Ln O LD 07 07 X W 00 00 0) Cd N LO M (_0 c O a_ -0 d7 Ln Ln co O LD 07 X� W � Q0 O Dd CD Lcj M Lfl a_ -0 CD Ln Lfl O LD 0) 07 X� W N c0 00 CO O LO 0) (0 a_ M F n Ln (0 O LD 07 X11� W 00 O CC' LD Ln 0) CO 07 a_ N Ln Co Ln Ln CO CD 07 07 X11� W 0-) O (6 Ln CO Ln � O_ O Ln CD O� 9+75 10+00 10+50 ENGINEERING DESIGNED O O SURVEYING DRAWN PLANNING Ph. 507-867-1666 CHECKED 14070 Hwy 52 S.E. Fax 507-8671665 Chatfield, MN 55923 WWW. .to 11+00 MRW ADB MRW 11+50 12+00 12+50 REVISED BY DATE CITY OF N T I C E LL WRIGHT COUNTY RESUBMITTAL ADB 0/18/202 RESUBMITTAL ADB 11/29/202 RESUBMITTAL ADB 12/6/2021 RESUBMITTAL ADB 12/8/2022 BENCHMARK: TOP NUT HYDRANT ON SCHOOL BOULEVARD 300' WEST OF THE INTERSECTION WITH EDMONSON AVENUE NE, ELEV:965.13 FISHER — PUD ADB 2/14/2023 13+00 -1--" 970 965 ••e 55 O a7 (�o 00 Ln Ln O cD X O� W 13+29.45 0 N cn V� E R T I a C A L S� C A L E a HORIZONTAL SCALE 10 0 5 10 20 M0NTICELLO LAKE APARTMENTS PLAN & PROFILE FOR UTILITIES SHEET 9 WARNING BEFORE DIGGING CALL GOPHER ' STATE ONE CALL FOR LOCATIONS. DIAL - 1-800-252-1166 REQUIRED BY LAW POOL 0 � n,,� oaoo❑ 0 0 I� W-8 STA: 21 +33.68 OFF: 11.00'R APARTMENT SANITARY F&I 8"X6" TEE 6" GATE VALVE 4' N 6" HYDRANT 7' N BREAKOFF ELEV:967.06 W-9 STA: 21 +84.11 OFF: 11.00'R APARTMENT SANITARY F&I 8" - 45° BEND W-10 STA:12+96.46 OFF:11.00'R STORM MAIN F&I 8" - 22.5° BEND W-11 STA:13+21.31 OFF: 11.00'R STORM MAIN F&I 8"X8" TEE 8"X6" REDUCER 54' W 8" GATE VALVE 3' N 6" GATE VALVE 57' W 6" HYDRANT 60' W BREAKOFF ELEV:961.32 r�U nnnrl -o s�3pPs q� 975 970 ti•e O Ln QD 0) X W s�30as lqz FM -T - , I I �r 0 0 I 1 M U B 1 - TYPE 1 CB 0- H- U 00 M FM -T - , I I �r 0 0 I 1 M 9+75 10+00 10+50 11+00 11+50 12+00 970 965 ••16 OW N Q0 07 12+36.15 V� E R T I N c A L S O C A L E N HORIZONTAL SCALE 10 0 5 10 20 DATE: 6/3/2021 REVISED BY DATE CITY �I M C ELL HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, II1 MONTICELLO LKEAPARTMENTS SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED Prepared For: ENGINEERING RESUBMITTAL ADB 0 18 202 JL NTI BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION DESIGNED MRW / / AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED Ba dur Real Estate, LLC 0 O SURVEYING DRAWN ADB RESUBMITTAL ADB 1/29/202 WRIGHT C O �J N T� PLAN Q� PR�FILE FI UTILITIES PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF JL 1 v (�( THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 19356 MEADOW RIDGE TRAIL N PLANNING RESUBMITTAL ADB 12/6/2021 MARINE ON ST. CROIX, MN 55047 Ph. 507-867-1666 MARK R WELCH CHECKED MRW BENCHMARK: 4070 Hwy 52 S.E. Fax 507-867-1665 RESUBMITTAL ADB 12/8/2022 SHEET 1 0 DATE X/X/XX REG. NO. 42736 www..to FISHER - PUD ADB 2 14 2023 TOP NUT HYDRANT ON SCHOOL BOULEVARD 300' WEST OF FILE NO.: 20-408 LAYOUT 3 GP & CP Chatfield, MN 55923 / / THE INTERSECTION WITH EDMONSON AVENUE NE, ELEV:965.13 OF 15 SHEETS B 1 - TYPE 1 CB CB 4 - TYPE 1 CB TA:10+70.00 0 F:0.00'T STA:10+00.0 OFF:0.00'T South Bld Trench Drain South Bld Trench Drain RATE: 968.08 GRATE: 966.00 UILD: 7.08 BUILD: 4.00 INV OUT: 961.00 SW INV OUT: 62.00 MH S-5 - PLT. NO. 4001 STA:12+51.64 OFF: 121.36' RT Storm Basins RIM: 966.421 BUILD: 11.43 E INV IN: 57.37 SE INV -IN-957.3-3--- N V OUT: 955.00 U F 170.00 LF 15" TRENCH o `o I mum (n DRAIN F&I 59.81 LF 15" SEPARATION HDPE @ 1.67% (PRIVATE) F&I 0.52 LF 15 8" D. 1. HDPE @ I .33% (PKI Ri VA'I E W/M 96100 STO 961.64 961.29 STO 960.92 960.50 STO 96 95-/.60 STO 95-/.93 O O -t Co co Ln 00 N 0-) O r1- O O r O CO CD CO N I- 0) O N CO rl O� co 0-) Or-- Ln I� Ln CD L6 Cd 00 O L6 Q0, O) L6 Lf CO L6 co Ln cD cD cD Lcj Cp cD Lcj Co CO CD cD CD (-D (-D Lo CD 6) 6) � c9 6) CD CD 0-) M CD CD 0) 6] CD CD 0) 11'l y- X D X D' X D' X X O W O W a_ W a_ W O_ W O- W 9+75 10+00 10+50 11+00 11+50 12+00 970 965 ••16 OW N Q0 07 12+36.15 V� E R T I N c A L S O C A L E N HORIZONTAL SCALE 10 0 5 10 20 DATE: 6/3/2021 REVISED BY DATE CITY �I M C ELL HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, II1 MONTICELLO LKEAPARTMENTS SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED Prepared For: ENGINEERING RESUBMITTAL ADB 0 18 202 JL NTI BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION DESIGNED MRW / / AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED Ba dur Real Estate, LLC 0 O SURVEYING DRAWN ADB RESUBMITTAL ADB 1/29/202 WRIGHT C O �J N T� PLAN Q� PR�FILE FI UTILITIES PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF JL 1 v (�( THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 19356 MEADOW RIDGE TRAIL N PLANNING RESUBMITTAL ADB 12/6/2021 MARINE ON ST. CROIX, MN 55047 Ph. 507-867-1666 MARK R WELCH CHECKED MRW BENCHMARK: 4070 Hwy 52 S.E. Fax 507-867-1665 RESUBMITTAL ADB 12/8/2022 SHEET 1 0 DATE X/X/XX REG. NO. 42736 www..to FISHER - PUD ADB 2 14 2023 TOP NUT HYDRANT ON SCHOOL BOULEVARD 300' WEST OF FILE NO.: 20-408 LAYOUT 3 GP & CP Chatfield, MN 55923 / / THE INTERSECTION WITH EDMONSON AVENUE NE, ELEV:965.13 OF 15 SHEETS I F ARNING DIGGING CALL GOP R E CALL FOR LOCA ONS. -800-252-1166 BY LAW 10.00' STA: 15+ 5.36 ELEV: 95 .50 F&I 36" RCP PRON & 17.6 CY CLAS III RIPRAP PER PL TE 4 09 /F &I FL RED D PILING PER P ATE 4 08 I I 1541-80 L------- --- -- 1-20.0 ' 970 965 ••/ 955 RE NW 950 X LIJ 15+05&1 146.39 -OF -36" RCP bJ�� �-) I Iv/11VIUIL� U -1 1 ►� 40 DIN ELI - 4' R o] I J7 Ll I - FL 9: 1 LOT 1 11 1 // - BLOCK 1-- / Ko I *AW sp ce / e� // ► � LA'S' / S- 82.25 LF 1 RCP @ 1.00% -------------------- DEVELOPM SIGN - ► 9' _ I F&I WJ.§1 LF 15" / Wv IIS I I 1 HDPE ©F 16244.43 LF 8"PVC' n g.q_ ,-oo�// W-7 II I I I I I II II ' • , -- H 2 / ILLJ S- OW-10 f• 12+00 F&I 121.36 LF 4" RCP @ 0.49% 11 I------ --- 11.00' 10 D. ~ *005-- 20' D.E. & U. E. 1 �,6g0 LF 36 1 / 3`39S•• 7�'��FFjOC�j� y� 9 °C° ti0 X ' -Y�� (Y, 1 `��90 6 14+�0 (� / \\ THE PRESERVES I- -54-S 6LM P- MAI N . _ .• I I � i I � I � I In nn' E E R 12.0' S-3 W-7 W-8 W-9 W-11 -12 �" S --A: 12+62.75 FF: CL STA: 1 +33.68 OF : 11.00'R STA: 21 +84.11 OFF: 11.00'R STA: 13+21. 1 OFF: 11.00' STA: 12+50.75 OFF: CL AMH S-4 - PLT. NO. 4001 W TERMAIN LOOP APARTMENT SANIT4,RY APARTMENT SANITARY STORM MAIN WATERMAIN LOOP L STA: 10+99.22 OFF: 0.00'T F 18"X8" CROSS F&I "X6" TEE F&I 8" 45° BEND F&I 8"X8" EE F 1 8' - 11.2 °BEND � Storm Main A RIM: 965.32 MH S-3 - PLT. NO. 4001 8' - 11.25° BEND 3' E 6" GATE VALVE 4' N 8"X6" RED CER 54' W E BUILD: 7.35 STA: 10+00.00 OFF: 0.00'T > >, N 3 - Main 8' GATE VALVE3' N BREAKOFF ELEV:9 7.06 STA: 12+96.46 OFF: 11 00'R 6 GATE VALVE 57 W HORrzo '� TAL SCALE 5 '� �o SE INV IN:959.12 RIM: 964.87 8' GATE VALVE3' S STORM AIN 6" HYDRAN 60' W W INV IN: 957.7 W INV OUT:957.97 BUILD: 4.00 NW INV OUT:960.87 8 GATE VALVE 3 W OF F&I 8 22.5° BEND BREAKOFF LEV:961.32 W BEND I "MHS -5 - PLT. NO. 4001 STA: 12+20.58 OFF: 0.00'T Storm Mai RIM: 966.4 OUTLET 1 BUILD: 11. 3E STA: 15 07.01 INV IN: 57.37 I ELEV:9 2.50LO MH S-6 - TYPE 4 MH (84") v� INV (PR VATE) F&I 36" RCP APRON & THE PRESERVER SD1v�� MIN. NE INV IN:• 60 00 8cl 99.22 LF 15" HD -F&I E © 1.76% PER PLATE F&I FL 4009 RED END PILING � LF 24" RCP © 0.49% (PUBLIC) SEPARATION F&I 121.36 PER PLATE 4008 Storm Main �0 R M: 959.95 8" D.I.P. L 10.45 W/M E INV IN:954.00 INV F(. T1g,6q9 LF 36 RCP @ 0.57% (PUBLIC) F&I 146.39 LF 36 cn 10 AL ON 8" PVC :952.5 STO 952.69 952.95 STO 9511.21 95-1.46 STO 95--1.72 95 .9 STO 95A.13 954.27 STO 954.41 954.55 STO 954.69 954.83 STO 954.98 95-/.47 STO 95160 95172 STO 95-/.84 95197 STO 962.86 96 .11 STO 96 .36 9611.61 STO Ln O Ln O 0p 07 c0 N 0-) N o0 M 00 O Ln O I� CO CO O O 7 o0 00 o� 0-) 00 M 00 LO N Ln 00 N 00 07 0-) 07 Co M Co co 00 N CO CO O O Ln Ln d7 Ln Ln 00 CO LCi Ln � Ln Ln - 7 CO CO O O Ln Ln O Ln Ln 00 Ln Ln I� Ln Ln Ln Ln �% Ln CO CO Cp CO co Cfl co Cfl j Ln CO Cfl Ln co Cfl CO Cfl CD co 6 Cfl CO CO Ln Ln co Cfl L6 Ln CO CO L[j Ln CO CO L[j Ln co (D O CO Cn d7 CO CO a7 CO CO a7 CO cO 07 0) CO CO M a7 CO cD O CO Cfl d7 d7 CO a7 CO Cfl M d7 CO cD M M CO cD a7 (fl (D 0) X11� 07 X 07 CD X 07 M X11� O X X 07 CD X 0-) X M X Q O X D' O X O X Of X W 0_ W a_ W a_ W 0_ W a_ LTJ IZ W IZ W a_ W 0_ W 0_ W a_ W a_ W 975 970 965 960 955 00 N d7 15+80.36 15+50 15+00 14+50 14+00 13+50 13+00 12+50 12+00 11+50 11+00 10+50 10+00 9+75 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, DATE: 6/3/2021 REVISED BY DATE LAKE �SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED Prepared Far: CI�Y O�� I��LLO MOTTICELLO MENTS BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ENGINEERING DESIGNED MRW RESUBMITTAL ADB 0/18/202 AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED Ba dur Real Estate, LLC O O SURVEYING DRAWN ADB RESUBMITTAL ADB11/29/202'WRIGHT COUNTY PQ� P�OFILE Fnu� UTILITIES PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF � �(, THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 19356 MEADOW RIDGE TRAIL N PLANNING RESUBMITTAL ADB 12/6/2021 MARINE ON ST. CROIX, MN 55047 Ph. 5078671666 MARK R WELCH CHECKED MRW BENCHMARK: r� 14070 Hwy 52 S.E. Fax 507-867-1665 RESUBMITTAL ADB 12/8/2022 SHEET It DATE X/X/XX REG. NO. 42736 WWW. 1 FISHER - PUD ADB 2 14 2023 TOP NUT HYDRANT ON SCHOOL BOULEVARD 300' WEST OF FILE NO.: 20-408 LAYOUT 3 GP & CP Chatfield, MN 55923 / / THE INTERSECTION WITH EDMONSON AVENUE NE, ELEV:965.13 OF 15 SHEETS • I 'I•' 11 • IZI W _ •- �G oo �� . �G ■■ � - �� 1 .rl :1I1■w■: Cal ilkrIWA 1 1■ ■a ■ �_ r.T r.n■/ • �, �� I • � loh ■■ . ■■ SII = ■■ - = o '- .tANSFO; . PAD LOT 1 CD 00 00 s BLOCK 1 °° z 9ti T 0 � 01 MONTICELL\ F9��<1'OBUSINECC _ Z: m / J 13+00 F&I 460.00 LF 18" RCP @ 0.50%12+00 + 0 G> � 1 '00 9+75 S50001 40"E 365.00 ern r/\u I --11\u HAO HAO - HAO ` HAO ------�]H 0 HAO HAO �H - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --------- ------------------------------------------------------ �HAO HAO ----3HAO -----3HAO -----3HAO ---AHAO --3HAO -----3HAO ------ �3HACI --AHAO -----EHAO -----3HAO -----3HAO --�IHAO ------BHAO ------3HAO ----�IHAO AO HAO -----EHAO ---IHAO HAO ---AHAO -------3HAO -----3HAO ------IHAO ---AHAO ------3HAO ------EHAO -------IHAO -----3HAO -----EHAO HHAO 1*4�901 J �HA6 A3 -AHAO ------3HAO H 0 ------IHAO -----3HAO ---AHAO HAO ----�IHAO ---AHAO -----IHAO -�HAO -�IHAO ------3HAO ]HAO BHAO :1HA0 11HAO 3HAO ]HAO 11HAO :]HAO BHAO SHA03 A HAO -�HAO SHA( SHA HAO 11HAO 3HAO AHAO :1HA0 ----�]HAO -----DHAO ------3HAO -------IHAO -----3HAO ------DHAO -----IHAO -----AHAO ------IHAO --AHAO ------IHAO / �HAO �HAO oH/ 0 HA0 ----3H, 00 00 0 6r, %io 1%i 3 95C.05 STO 956.18 956.31 Ln STO 95E.43 00 M O� Ln co O� X W M O� O-) n Ln CD L(j O� co O' 0)0) 0 M Ln CO N CO 0') X W N CD 0') 0 N 0) 4 (0 mCT) N 0) Co 13+50 13+00 X O' DATE: 6/3/2021 M 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED Prepared For: BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT IAM A DULY LICENSED Baldur Real Estate, LLC PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 19356 MEADOW RIDGE TRAIL N MARINE ON ST. CROIX, MN 55047 MARK R WELCH DATE X/X/XX REG. NO. 42736 FILE NO.: 20-408 LAYOUT 3 GP & CP F&I 460.00 LF 18" RCP @ 0.50% (PUBLIC) 956.56 STO 956.69 12+50 956.81 STO 950.9 00 D2 o r`7 r'77 Ln Ln 00 00 4 co 4 CO -7 4 � J-) 0') (D(D n X O' a) M W W OD 12+50 956.81 STO 950.9 00 D2 o r`7 r'77 m a7 15' 1 0 9+75 v �\ y 04% /o x o CD Co r j n m 0) LD X � OD W W 12+00 14070 Hwy 52 S.E. Chatfield, MN 55923 V <- E R I N C A L S C A L E N HORIZ NTAL SCALE 10 o s 10 4 95106 STO 957. 19 a7 � N N I.r) r7 00 00 cD CO N rn rn X D W 0 11+50 ENGINEERING DESIGNED SURVEYING DRAWN PLANNING Ph. 507-867-1666 CHECKED Fax 507-867-1665 www..t0 95�.32 STO 9511.44 0) M Ln n O O N N n Ln cD CO c i N M 0) LD X D W 0 11+00 MRW I ADB MRW MH S-7 - TYPE 4 MH (48" STA:10+00.00 OFF:0.00'T Powerline Storm RIM: 960.70 BUILD: 2.88 NW INV OUT:957.82 975 965 955 I �\�-Oz) +09 W\3 os M9� S qT ;0 2 ECFV.9 +?2.00 0 I 5 &o5�5RCp Y PER PCA TE �S /I/ R0 �& o 009 AP *Mtrl o / CD U O / o 00LL- / J / O / �o IMPQu RO C CCO q C/T Sq WCU MENTS E (/S. EXl TlN CCEDM OV D,ggNC eETTE CONS/ THE Sq T/S T ° THE �N OR C/Ty CT/ON ° X006 S E CITYCo HE TE NO 964 \o w W- 7 \, 1711 �6 L` / o 0 / / n0 < "yam I I D2 o r`7 r'77 O 111F10�� F0 72,0 15' 1 0 9+75 v �\ y 04% /o x o \ / 0)� C�? �� 03 ti \ o 0 C �O 95�.32 STO 9511.44 0) M Ln n O O N N n Ln cD CO c i N M 0) LD X D W 0 11+00 MRW I ADB MRW MH S-7 - TYPE 4 MH (48" STA:10+00.00 OFF:0.00'T Powerline Storm RIM: 960.70 BUILD: 2.88 NW INV OUT:957.82 975 965 955 I �\�-Oz) +09 W\3 os M9� S qT ;0 2 ECFV.9 +?2.00 0 I 5 &o5�5RCp Y PER PCA TE �S /I/ R0 �& o 009 AP *Mtrl o / CD U O / o 00LL- / J / O / �o IMPQu RO C CCO q C/T Sq WCU MENTS E (/S. EXl TlN CCEDM OV D,ggNC eETTE CONS/ THE Sq T/S T ° THE �N OR C/Ty CT/ON ° X006 S E CITYCo HE TE NO 964 \o w W- 7 \, 1711 �6 L` / o 0 / / n0 < "yam I I D2 o r`7 r'77 O 111F10�� F0 72,0 15' 1 0 9+75 v �\ y 04% /o x o \ / 0)� C�? �� 03 ti \ o 0 C �O 11+00 MRW I ADB MRW MH S-7 - TYPE 4 MH (48" STA:10+00.00 OFF:0.00'T Powerline Storm RIM: 960.70 BUILD: 2.88 NW INV OUT:957.82 975 965 955 I �\�-Oz) +09 W\3 os M9� S qT ;0 2 ECFV.9 +?2.00 0 I 5 &o5�5RCp Y PER PCA TE �S /I/ R0 �& o 009 AP *Mtrl o / CD U O / o 00LL- / J / O / �o IMPQu RO C CCO q C/T Sq WCU MENTS E (/S. EXl TlN CCEDM OV D,ggNC eETTE CONS/ THE Sq T/S T ° THE �N OR C/Ty CT/ON ° X006 S E CITYCo HE TE NO 964 \o w W- 7 \, 1711 �6 L` / o 0 / / n0 < "yam I I D2 o r`7 r'77 O 111F10�� F0 72,0 15' 1 0 9+75 v �\ y 04% /o x o \ / 0)� C�? �� 03 ti \ o 0 C �O EWE 965 ••e 955 O 95-/.57 STO 957.69 95-/.82 0) X LD CD LD CD M M W Ln Ln r7 r7 N N 't � OUTLET #2 CB ED2 - TYPE 1 CB STA: 10+72.00 STA:10+00.00 OFF:0.00'T ELEV:959.00 CB ED2 F&I 15" RCP APRON & GRATE: 963.39 5.1 CY CLASS III RIPRAP BUILD: 5.24 PER PLATE 4 O9 W INV OUT:95 .39 LJ F&I 72.00 STO 959.12 95 .25 STO 95 .39 cD CD 00 0o O O CD O O 00 CO 00 00 I- O O n LnZc N N r) CO CDCO CO CO CO CD Mw 7D Co 7D1 MM M X Q' M CD X 0_ (n0') X 0_ X W W W W W W W N N CD Co N N `D Co `D `D 11+03,08 11+00 X D X Q X D W 0 W W W W 10+50 10+00 9+75 REVISED BY DATE CITY OF' M RESUBMITTAL ADB 10/18/202' RESUBMITTAL ADB 11 /29/202 WRIGHT COUNTY RESUBMITTAL ADB 12/6/2021 RESUBMITTAL ADB 12/8/2022 BENCHMARK: TOP NUT HYDRANT ON SCHOOL BOULEVARD 300' WEST OF FISHER - PUD ADB 2/14/2023 THE INTERSECTION WITH EDMONSON AVENUE NE, ELEV:965.13 10+50 975 Iwo] 965 Co W 10+00 9+75 MOVTICLLLO LAKE A7JI"'A-1-7\.TMENTS PLAN & PIRIOFtLE FO -IF" UTILITIES N N CD Co N N `D Co `D `D 11+03,08 11+00 X D X Q X D W 0 W W W W 10+50 10+00 9+75 REVISED BY DATE CITY OF' M RESUBMITTAL ADB 10/18/202' RESUBMITTAL ADB 11 /29/202 WRIGHT COUNTY RESUBMITTAL ADB 12/6/2021 RESUBMITTAL ADB 12/8/2022 BENCHMARK: TOP NUT HYDRANT ON SCHOOL BOULEVARD 300' WEST OF FISHER - PUD ADB 2/14/2023 THE INTERSECTION WITH EDMONSON AVENUE NE, ELEV:965.13 10+50 975 Iwo] 965 Co W 10+00 9+75 MOVTICLLLO LAKE A7JI"'A-1-7\.TMENTS PLAN & PIRIOFtLE FO -IF" UTILITIES 10+50 975 Iwo] 965 Co W 10+00 9+75 MOVTICLLLO LAKE A7JI"'A-1-7\.TMENTS PLAN & PIRIOFtLE FO -IF" UTILITIES WARNING BEFORE DIGGING CALL GOPHER STATE ONE CALL FOR LOCATIONS DIAL - 1-800-252-1166 / REQUIRED BY LAW / � A/ xlc\)� -R) - C� ��► _ _ \ ° :II- 1- I T 1- �O <� �;y �j ZX,O Q r� ` O i Eru==z --- �o r T o o > > o I I ° \ I I J- 32 - J ` X \ 1 - - - Q \ \ \ -� i I -1 1--- -- IL Jj F� xro0�0 PQ t'c� p 16 16+85 16+00 F&I 200.00 LF 18" RCP @ 1.50% 15+00 \ 14+00 " \ 13+00 F&I 460.00 LF 18 RCP @ 0.507-12+00 `\ S50001'40"E 365.00 �HAO HAO SHA H 0 HAOi-r/\0 HAO HAO HAO HAO HAO HAO HAO HAOHAO \ HAO HAO o �H -----IHAO HAO HAO ----------------------------------------------------- ---- HHAO �HAO �H 0 B AO HHAO BHAO �HAO HHAO �HAO BHAO BHAO BHAO BHAO HHAO C� HAO HAO HAO HHAO 3HAO HAO BHAO 11HAO HHAO BHAO HAO-]HAO HHAC 0 �' PM�HA� 3R/TO SHA AO 3H� �F AO �HTA0 �HAO �H/-0 �HAO BHAO �HAO BHAO �HAO HAO 0 HAO HAO --3HAO HAO --�IHAO -------IHAO -----�IHAO ---AHAO ------�IHAO -----3HAO BHAO ]HAO 3HAO :IHAO ---3HAO SHA ---AH 0 HAO HAO HAO HAO HAO HAO HAO HAO HAO \HAO ------IHAO 0 HAO --3HAO HAO HAO HAO --AHAO ------3HAO ------DHAO --AHAO -----3HAO ------E]HAO -------IHAO ------DHAO - --3HAO ----�]HAO AO HAO HAO HAO HAO ----3HAO HAO -----IHAO -----3HAO HAO HAO HAO HAO ----�IHAO HAO HAO SHA -----3HAO ---3HAO -----3HAO ---�HAO ------3HAO ------ �IHAO -----3HAO -------3HAO -----�IHAO -----3HAO 970 965 ••1 955 REGIC POI N WL: c 950 N E E R 16+85 16+50 16+00 15+50 15+00 14+50 14+00 13+50 13+00 12+50 12+00 DATE: 6/3/2021 REVISED BY DATE HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, CITY OF M MONTICELLO LAKE APAJDLII.TMENTS SPECIFICATION, FY REPORT WAS PREPARED Prepared Far: ENGINEERING �JJJJJ��L BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION DESIGNED MRW RESUBMITTAL ADB 0/18/202 AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED Ba dur Real Estate, LLC 0 O SURVEYING DRAWN ADB RESUBMITTAL ADB 1/29/202 WRIGHT COUNTY PQ� PJQLLOFtLE Fnulk�" UTILITIES PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF � �(, THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 19356 MEADOW RIDGE TRAIL N PLANNING RESUBMITTAL ADB 12/6/2021 MARINE ON ST. CROIX, MN 55047 Ph. 5078671666 MARK R WELCH CHECKED MRW BENCHMARK: r� 4070 Hwy 52 S.E. Fax 507-867-1665 RESUBMITTAL ADB 12/8/2022 SHEET 13 DATE x/x/xx REG. NO. 42736 www.ggg1 FISHER - PUD ADB 2 14 2023 TOP NUT HYDRANT ON SCHOOL BOULEVARD 300' WEST OF FILE NO.: 20-408 LAYOUT 3 GP & CP Chatfield, MN 55923 / / THE INTERSECTION WITH EDMONSON AVENUE NE, ELEV:965.13 OF 15 SHEETS I N C A L S C A L E a HORIZON AL SCALE 10 o s io 20 MH S-8 - TYPE 4 MH (48") STA 14+60.00 OFF: .00'T _ Powerline Storm RIM: 966.10 OUTLET #3 0o BUILD: 10.60 S A:16+60.001 SE NW NV IN:955.50 INV OUT:955.50 F 118" RCP APRON & 6 8 CY CLASS III RIPRAP P R PLATE 4009 F I FLARED END PILING F&I 460.00 LF 18" RCP @ 0.50% (PUBLIC) PER PLATE 4008 F&I 200.00 LF 18 NAL D 52.5 95 .65 STO 95 .02 95 .40 STO 95 .78 95z -,l5 STO 95 .52 95 .90 STO 95 .28 95 .55 STO 95 .68 95 .80 STO 95 .93 95 .05 STO 95 .18 95 .31 STO 95 .43 95 .56 STO 95E,69 956.81 STO 95C.94 X W r0 N a CO I�1`0r7 N cD O CO CO a7 X W � CO O Co CO 0_ �rn O_ O O O O Cfl CD X W OO c0 O cD cD cD � d7M D_ N O O O cD LD M X W N O (0 c0 CO M CO O� 00 O O O CO M X W 0o O Ln (0 N c0 CO 0) (0 f M D_ 1`0n L N N CO CD CO CO 0) rn X W CN � co CD 0) O 01 �� D_ d7 O CO O CO rn X W M CD Crj CO (�6� W N a) r7 Ln L6 Ln CD CO M X W N n N L6 CO � M O � DC7) W N Ln � CO LD X W Ln 00 (D � 07 �O) d O 00 � CO CO X W O a7 � �6 LO CO Mj O M6) W r 7 LO rr) CO 16+85 16+50 16+00 15+50 15+00 14+50 14+00 13+50 13+00 12+50 12+00 DATE: 6/3/2021 REVISED BY DATE HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, CITY OF M MONTICELLO LAKE APAJDLII.TMENTS SPECIFICATION, FY REPORT WAS PREPARED Prepared Far: ENGINEERING �JJJJJ��L BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION DESIGNED MRW RESUBMITTAL ADB 0/18/202 AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED Ba dur Real Estate, LLC 0 O SURVEYING DRAWN ADB RESUBMITTAL ADB 1/29/202 WRIGHT COUNTY PQ� PJQLLOFtLE Fnulk�" UTILITIES PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF � �(, THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 19356 MEADOW RIDGE TRAIL N PLANNING RESUBMITTAL ADB 12/6/2021 MARINE ON ST. CROIX, MN 55047 Ph. 5078671666 MARK R WELCH CHECKED MRW BENCHMARK: r� 4070 Hwy 52 S.E. Fax 507-867-1665 RESUBMITTAL ADB 12/8/2022 SHEET 13 DATE x/x/xx REG. NO. 42736 www.ggg1 FISHER - PUD ADB 2 14 2023 TOP NUT HYDRANT ON SCHOOL BOULEVARD 300' WEST OF FILE NO.: 20-408 LAYOUT 3 GP & CP Chatfield, MN 55923 / / THE INTERSECTION WITH EDMONSON AVENUE NE, ELEV:965.13 OF 15 SHEETS I 2 LAYERS OF W 2'- 6" AS REQUIRED 1( POLY (4 mIQ v x I .w DIAMETER BY 3' DEEP PIT INOER HYORANT FILLED WITH I MINIMUM OF I C.Y, OF 1 p 1/4 "STEEL VALVE BOX ADAPTOR -1/2" CLEAR STONE 14 - WITH PROTECTIVE COATING AS MANUFACTURED BY ADAPTOR INC. OR APPROVED EQUAL MEGALUG MEGALUG L GATE VALVE TEE THRUST MEGALUG BLOCKING BLOCKINGBEHIND BELOW GATE THRUST HYDRANT PRECAST CONCRETE BASE y�yE BLOCKING AS SPECIFIED (15% 15"x 4') BEHIND TEE BUILDING Standard Plate Library Typical Hydrant Installation City of Monticello Date: 03-05 Plate No. RelIsed:03-17 2001 INSTALLED BY PRIVATE CONTRACT :ER WIRE LOCATE BOX GROUND STREET INSTALLED AS PER CITY CONTRACT I I I TRACER WIRE SPLICE OR 5' IN RACK OF CURB � I COPPER -CLAD STEEL AWG 12 GAUGE) TRACER WIRE 30 MIL HIGH DENSITY CONCRETE WALK OR POLYETHYLENE GREEN COLORED JACKETI POLYETHYLENE GREEN COLORED JACKET BITUMINOUS PATH ARE HYDRAFINDER CONTRACT PRESENT FLAG MASONRY CONSTRUCTION WATEROUS MODEL 67 EXTERNAL CHIMNEY SEAL DRILL HYDRANT COPPER -CLAD STEEL AWG 12 GAUGE YELLOW OUT OF ORDER TAG TRACER WIRE 30MIL HIGH DENSITY �i TO BE INSTALLED ON PUMPER CONN. zl TO BE PROVIDED UNDER CITY CONTRACT AFTER BACK -FILL IZ SANITARY SERVICE MAINLINE 4" OR 6" PVC BRFAKOFF FLANGE EXISTING OR FUTURE STREET w 7" TO 2" MAXIMUM CURB OR GUTTER LINE aol PIPE SHALL BE COMPLETELY ENTRENCHED ABOVE BURY ONE (FINISHED GRADE)FINISHED s PRECAST PIPE, EXCEPT 48" DIA MAY BE GRADE VALVE BOX A$ WATERMAIN CONCRETE MORTAR ALL SIDES CY - SPECIFIED I"T02" .➢1Jn I 2 LAYERS OF W 2'- 6" AS REQUIRED 1( POLY (4 mIQ v x I .w DIAMETER BY 3' DEEP PIT INOER HYORANT FILLED WITH I MINIMUM OF I C.Y, OF 1 p 1/4 "STEEL VALVE BOX ADAPTOR -1/2" CLEAR STONE 14 - WITH PROTECTIVE COATING AS MANUFACTURED BY ADAPTOR INC. OR APPROVED EQUAL MEGALUG MEGALUG L GATE VALVE TEE THRUST MEGALUG BLOCKING BLOCKINGBEHIND BELOW GATE THRUST HYDRANT PRECAST CONCRETE BASE y�yE BLOCKING AS SPECIFIED (15% 15"x 4') BEHIND TEE BUILDING Standard Plate Library Typical Hydrant Installation City of Monticello Date: 03-05 Plate No. RelIsed:03-17 2001 INSTALLED BY PRIVATE CONTRACT :ER WIRE LOCATE BOX GROUND STREET INSTALLED AS PER CITY CONTRACT I I I TRACER WIRE SPLICE ADJUSTING RINGS CURB BOX STANDPIPE I COPPER -CLAD STEEL AWG 12 GAUGE) TRACER WIRE 30 MIL HIGH DENSITY 2' SPOOL COPPER -CLAD STEEL AWG 12 GAUGE TRACER WIRE 30 MIL HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE GREEN COLORED JACKETI POLYETHYLENE GREEN COLORED JACKET TO BE PROVIDED UNDER PRIVATE I TO BE PROVIDE UNDER CITY CONTRACT CONTRACT SEWER BRICK (MnDOT SPEC 3616) BLOCK � f MASONRY CONSTRUCTION ROADWAY SURFACE EXTERNAL CHIMNEY SEAL DRILL 1" COPPER WATERMAIN COPPER -CLAD STEEL AWG 12 GAUGE SEE MnDOT STANDARD PLATE 4020 TRACER WIRE 30MIL HIGH DENSITY �i POLYFTHLNF GREEN COLORED JACKET SHALL BE NEENAH R -3508-A2. TO BE PROVIDED UNDER CITY CONTRACT OR 6". NO ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION SHALL BE ALLOWED FOR CONCRETE ENCASEMENT OR PIPE BEDDING. SANITARY SERVICE MAINLINE 4" OR 6" PVC SANITARY SEWER Title: Tracer Wire Standard Plate Library (New Developments) City of Monticello Date: 03-08 Plate No. �- Revised: 3005 03-15 TIES REQUIRED TO CLEAN OUTS USE 4" OR 6" CISP PLUG AND CAP, TOP TO BE 1/2 " BELOW FINISHED GRADE r FINISHED GRADE VARIES 10' TO 20' 1/8 BEND 6" PVC RISER FOR NDN -RESIDENTIAL 4" PVC RISER FOR RESIDENTIAL 4" OR 6" VERTICAL WYE (PVC) CONCRETE ENCASEMENT 12" ALL AROUND (INCIDENTAL) r WATER TIGHT GASKET ` OR CEMENTED PLUG Plc HORIZONTAL WYE (PVC) THRUST BLOCKING FOR CLEANING EQUIPMENT % PAYMENT FOR 6" RISER PIPE, 6" VERTICAL WYE 45' BEND AND PLUG WILL BE PAID FOR AT UNIT PRICE BID PER EACH. 2. CLEAN -OUTS REQUIRED AT 70' INTERVALS FROM MAIN SEWER UNE. Title: Standard Plate Library Sanitary Clean -Out City of Monticello Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised:03-15 3006 GROUTING BETWEEN PIPE ANI MANHOLE BARRELSHALL BE WITH NON -SHRINKING CEMEN ALL MANHOLES WITH INSIDE DROP SECTION SHALL BE S' DLA (I.D.) MANHOLE SECTION TO BE ASTM C-478 CLASS II CIRCULAR REINF LATEST REVISION USE R-2 JOINT FOR ALL MANHOLE JOINTS "CRE-SEAL","RESEAL", OR APPROVED EQUAL PRECAST GASKET CONNECTION SHALL BE USED FOR CONNECTION PIPE TO MANHOLE -,, MAX. 24" 02 PRECAST BOTTOM SECTION WITH INVLRT #5 AT 12" OC EACH WAY SEALS (INTERNAL OR EXTERNAL) )R APPROVED EQUAL" STANDARD MANHOLE FRAME AND COVER ADJUSTING RINGS MIN 4" - MAX 12" STEPS AT 16" OC " 8 VARIABLE l 6" MIN STANDARD MANHOLE FOR SANITARY SEWER NO SCALE NOTES: Q1 MANHOLE STEPS SHALL BE CAST IRON OR MA MODEL PS -I -PF (DY MA INDUSTRIAL INC.) CONFORMING TO ALL OSHA REGULATIONS AND SPACED 16" OC. O2 IF DROP IS GREATER THAN 24' INCHES, USE OUTSIDE DROP. AStanPlate Library City of Monticello Title: Standard Sanitary Manhole late: 03-05 Plate No. Revised`03-15 3001 ."� STRUCTURE • 8" POURED CONCRETE BASE, FOR ALTERNATE PRECAST CONCRETE BASE. SEE MnDOT STANDARD PLATE 4011 (MODIFY DIAMETER AND 2" RAISED AREA TO FIT REQUIRED DIAMETER. O1 REFER TO STANDARD PLANS FOR HEIGHT AND DIAMETER REQUIRED. O2 MANHOLE STEPS SHALL BE CAST IRON OR MA MODEL PS--I-PF (BY MA INDUSTRIAL INC.) CONFORMING TO ALL OSHA REGULATIONS AND SPACED 16" OC. © MINIMUM STEEL REINFORCEMENT ® EQUIVALENT STEEL AREA IN WIRE MESH MAY BE USED © GENERAL DIMENSIONS FOR CONCRETE APPLY TO BRICK AND CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT CONSTRUCTION ALSO, EXCEPT AS NOTED. ® 12" MINIMUM FOR PRECAST, 3 BRICKS OR 1 BLOCK MINIMUM FOR MASONRY CONSTUCTION © REINFORCEMENT AS PER MnDOT SPEC 3301, GRADE 60. Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Q CASTING ADJUSTING RINGS MANHOLE SECTIONS PLASTERED EXTERIOR 4" MIN - 12" MAX STANDARD FRAME & COVER DIA INSTALL INFRA SHIELD ADJUSTING RINGS SEWER BRICK (MnDOT SPEC 3616) BLOCK (OR APPROVED EQUAL) MASONRY CONSTRUCTION ROADWAY SURFACE EXTERNAL CHIMNEY SEAL DRILL DEPTH OF COVER OVER CASTING TO THE PRECAST SECTION SEE MnDOT STANDARD PLATE 4020 CATCH BASINS LOCATED IN DRIVEWAYS SHALL BE TYPE MnDOT �i FOR COVER REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE NEENAH R -3508-A2. TOP OF PIPE TO SUIT OR 6". NO ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION SHALL BE ALLOWED FOR CONCRETE ENCASEMENT OR PIPE BEDDING. 4" OR 6" PVC 4" 4" OR 6" PVC FIELD CONDITIONS WALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE CLASS II MIN MIN PIPE SHALL BE COMPLETELY ENTRENCHED i W �idiNNN PRECAST PIPE, EXCEPT 48" DIA MAY BE CONCRETE MORTAR ALL SIDES CY o .➢1Jn I yN ASTM C 478 CONCRETE PIPE. SEE MnDOT STANDARD oz z W 7y r o 8" CAST -IN-PLACE ANN PLATE 3000 (NO TONGUE OR GROOVE AT TOP w m ILL0 � Z CONCRETE )vmm OR BOTTOM OF THIS SECTION). CAST -IN-PLACE N�mhv.m o m U O Nm�mM1 CONNECT TO MANHOLE m CONCRETE OR MASONRY CONSTRUCTION o .. .. .. .. d O 4' TO 1p' 3.j4 (BRICK OR BLOCK) ALLOWED ONLY IF APPROVED Wm !O oi"i z :F a� BY ENGINEER z C7 p :•� a IN, CONCRETE DOGHOUSE REQUIRED ON EL mm-InmMcii OUTSIDE AND INSIDE OF STRUCTURE O - hw❑3��idvim :,���Z���aminma-�nmam,nmmam AND PIPE CONNECTION 2 oz t2 '44mN Q mRll G_ w � d � � x � � O] ups UU ."� STRUCTURE • 8" POURED CONCRETE BASE, FOR ALTERNATE PRECAST CONCRETE BASE. SEE MnDOT STANDARD PLATE 4011 (MODIFY DIAMETER AND 2" RAISED AREA TO FIT REQUIRED DIAMETER. O1 REFER TO STANDARD PLANS FOR HEIGHT AND DIAMETER REQUIRED. O2 MANHOLE STEPS SHALL BE CAST IRON OR MA MODEL PS--I-PF (BY MA INDUSTRIAL INC.) CONFORMING TO ALL OSHA REGULATIONS AND SPACED 16" OC. © MINIMUM STEEL REINFORCEMENT ® EQUIVALENT STEEL AREA IN WIRE MESH MAY BE USED © GENERAL DIMENSIONS FOR CONCRETE APPLY TO BRICK AND CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT CONSTRUCTION ALSO, EXCEPT AS NOTED. ® 12" MINIMUM FOR PRECAST, 3 BRICKS OR 1 BLOCK MINIMUM FOR MASONRY CONSTUCTION © REINFORCEMENT AS PER MnDOT SPEC 3301, GRADE 60. Standard Plate Library City of Monticello FOR COMPLETE TYPE "A" DROP SECTION UNIT PRICE SHALL INCLUDE ANY CUTTING INTO MANHOLE RASE REQUIRED, ELBOW, TEE, PIPE, SUPPORT AS REQUIRED. PRE -CAST CONCRETE OR MANHOLER:4CATCH-'�-. CATCH MANHOLE SECTIONS PLASTERED EXTERIOR BASIN ONE LENGTH (20'- 0') DEPRESSED 0.10' BELOW GUTTER DIA OF DIP IN LIEU OF PVC ADJUSTING RINGS SEWER BRICK (MnDOT SPEC 3616) BLOCK 4" MIN - 12" MAX MASONRY CONSTRUCTION FOR COMPLETE TYPE "A" DROP SECTION UNIT PRICE SHALL INCLUDE ANY CUTTING INTO MANHOLE RASE REQUIRED, ELBOW, TEE, PIPE, SUPPORT AS REQUIRED. Title: AStandard Plate Library Outside Drop Section for Sanitary Manhole City of Monticello Date: 03-04 Plate No. Revised. 3002 3002 D A 35 1/4 43" INLET FRAME AND GURB BOX NEEN O REENAH N0. R -3067-V PRE -CAST CONCRETE 4" CONCRETE COLLAR MANHOLE SECTIONS DUCTILE IRON TEE SHOWN ON THE PLANS HAVE BEEN ONE LENGTH (20'- 0') DEPRESSED 0.10' BELOW GUTTER EXTERNAL CHIMNEY SEAL OF DIP IN LIEU OF PVC ADJUSTING RINGS a "� 4" MIN - 12" MAX POUR A 3" TO 4" CONCRETE COLLAR ENCASE IN CONCRETE CORE DRILL DEPTH OF COVER OVER CASTING TO THE PRECAST SECTION CONN CT TO MANHOLE CATCH BASINS LOCATED IN DRIVEWAYS SHALL BE TYPE MnDOT �i CASTING SHALL BE NEENAH R -3508-A2. TOP OF PIPE TO SUIT OR 6". NO ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION SHALL BE ALLOWED FOR CONCRETE ENCASEMENT OR PIPE BEDDING. 4" OR 6" PVC 4" 4" OR 6" PVC FIELD CONDITIONS MIN MIN PIPE SHALL BE COMPLETELY ENTRENCHED i W �idiNNN CONCRETE HORSESHOE AND CONCRETE MORTAR ALL SIDES CY o .➢1Jn I yN x MVI� W 7y r o J INT AI W ANN MIN w m ILL0 � Z )vmm CORE DRILL N�mhv.m o m U O Nm�mM1 CONNECT TO MANHOLE m MAINLINE SEWER RISER BASE .. .. .. .. Title: AStandard Plate Library Outside Drop Section for Sanitary Manhole City of Monticello Date: 03-04 Plate No. Revised. 3002 3002 D A 35 1/4 43" INLET FRAME AND GURB BOX NEEN O REENAH N0. R -3067-V 24" 3'- 6" FINISH GRADE PLAN 4" CONCRETE COLLAR ALL STORM SEWER CASTING ELEVATIONS INSTALL INFRA SHIELD SHOWN ON THE PLANS HAVE BEEN (OR APPROVED EQUAL) DEPRESSED 0.10' BELOW GUTTER EXTERNAL CHIMNEY SEAL ELEVATION (SEE DETAIL 5003) ADJUSTING RINGS a "� 4" MIN - 12" MAX POUR A 3" TO 4" CONCRETE COLLAR ENCASE IN CONCRETE 6" COLLARUSE CONCRETE CURB MIX FOR COLLAR DEPTH OF COVER OVER 24" 3'- 6" FINISH GRADE / TO BE SET BY THE STEEL T -STYLE FENCE POST PAINTED - WYEELEV BASEMENTS AND SHALLOW SEWER AS 4" CONCRETE COLLAR DIRECTEO BY THE ENGINEER SECTION A MINIMUM 2" REFLECTORiZED TAPE TYPICAL SERVICE WHERE COVER OVER NOTES: a "� (ENGINEER GRADE) AT THE TOP OF THE POUR A 3" TO 4" CONCRETE COLLAR NOTES: AROUND RINGS EXTENDING FROM THE DEPTH OF COVER OVER CASTING TO THE PRECAST SECTION BE INSTALLED AT THE TIME OF SERVICE CATCH BASINS LOCATED IN DRIVEWAYS SHALL BE TYPE MnDOT DESIGN H. THE CASTING SHALL BE NEENAH R -3508-A2. TOP OF PIPE TO SUIT / TO BE SET BY THE STEEL T -STYLE FENCE POST PAINTED - WYEELEV BASEMENTS AND SHALLOW SEWER AS GREEN WITH AN OIL BASED PAINT AND A DIRECTEO BY THE ENGINEER TO VERIFY PRIOR TO BURY MINIMUM 2" REFLECTORiZED TAPE TYPICAL SERVICE WHERE COVER OVER MIN a "� (ENGINEER GRADE) AT THE TOP OF THE � N U NOTES: POST TO MARK THE SERVICE STUB TO DEPTH OF COVER OVER TOP OF PIPE TO SUIT BE INSTALLED AT THE TIME OF SERVICE DEPTH OF COVER QUER _ BENDS AND SPECIAL FITTINGS SHALL BE PAID FOR AT CONCRETE ENCASEMENT INSTALLATION (INCIDENTAL) TOP OF PIPE TO SUIT OR 6". NO ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION SHALL BE ALLOWED FOR CONCRETE ENCASEMENT OR PIPE BEDDING. 4" OR 6" PVC 4" 4" OR 6" PVC FIELD CONDITIONS MIN MIN PIPE SHALL BE COMPLETELY ENTRENCHED DISSIMILAR PIPES W �idiNNN AND SHALL RAVE CLASS "B" BEDDING CY Or✓1 .➢1Jn WHERE DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER yN ❑�wV MVI� W 7y r 6" J INT AI W ANN MIN SEE 0 PET L BELO TO BE SET BY THE PLACE NEARLY HORIZONTAL FOR LOW WYEELEV BASEMENTS AND SHALLOW SEWER AS Ksa DIRECTEO BY THE ENGINEER TO VERIFY PRIOR TO BURY �im�dNlo TYPICAL SERVICE WHERE COVER OVER MIN a "� TOP OF SEWER IS 12' OR LESS � N U NOTES: PVC - POLY -VINYL CHLORIDE SOR 26 DEPTH OF COVER OVER TOP OF PIPE TO SUIT ALL SERVICE CONNECTIONS INCLUDING NECESSARY FIELD CONDITIONS BENDS AND SPECIAL FITTINGS SHALL BE PAID FOR AT CONCRETE ENCASEMENT THE CONTRACT UNIT PRICE BID PER LINEAR FOOT OF 4" OR 6". NO ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION SHALL BE ALLOWED FOR CONCRETE ENCASEMENT OR PIPE BEDDING. (TYPICAL) 4" OR 6" PVC SEE DETAIL BELOW FOR 4' UTILITY EASEMENT LINE 1• LINE 2' 5' 45'BFND TYPICAL SERVICE WHERE COVER OVER ADAPTER TO BE RESILIENT TOP OF SEWER IS 12' OR MORE ASTM C425-64 TYPE III OR APPRCVED EQUAL FOR DISSIMILAR PIPES "•\—CONCRETE ENCASEMENT (TYPICAL) -kms PVC WYE �� VCP TO PVC FERNCO ENCASED IN CONCRETE SHALL BE REQUIRED - +::;�: WHEN CONNECTING TO EXISTING ''" /" "_ VCP SEWER MAIN (INCIDENTAL). )CRETE ENCASEMENT) . •���DEIA3L CRET THRUST BLOCKING FOR CLEANING EQUIPMENT Title: AStandard Plate Library Typical Service Connection City of Monticello Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised: 03-15 3004 H ELIH O L 0 U W Z Q CY LL 0 w w Q a7 TO BE SET BY THE �pG❑ N��F�hl'1mh.➢�ff -o�LL��N�i Nowa og WYEELEV ENGINEER - CONTRACTOR Ksa 4" TO VERIFY PRIOR TO BURY �im�dNlo ON MIN a "� PIPE SHALL BE COMPLETELY ENTRENCHED � N U AND SHALL HAVE CUSS "B" BEGGING s, WHERE DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER CONCRETE ENCASEMENT a���rRnNmm�om (TYPICAL) SEE DETAIL BELOW FOR CAULKING BETWEEN MIN DISSIMILAR PIPES 45'BFND TYPICAL SERVICE WHERE COVER OVER ADAPTER TO BE RESILIENT TOP OF SEWER IS 12' OR MORE ASTM C425-64 TYPE III OR APPRCVED EQUAL FOR DISSIMILAR PIPES "•\—CONCRETE ENCASEMENT (TYPICAL) -kms PVC WYE �� VCP TO PVC FERNCO ENCASED IN CONCRETE SHALL BE REQUIRED - +::;�: WHEN CONNECTING TO EXISTING ''" /" "_ VCP SEWER MAIN (INCIDENTAL). )CRETE ENCASEMENT) . •���DEIA3L CRET THRUST BLOCKING FOR CLEANING EQUIPMENT Title: AStandard Plate Library Typical Service Connection City of Monticello Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised: 03-15 3004 H ELIH O L 0 U W Z Q CY LL 0 w w Q a7 n ~O Q d vy Z }^ �u U ❑ �pG❑ N��F�hl'1mh.➢�ff -o�LL��N�i Nowa og w ❑ u]mm Ksa - ❑ ow � �im�dNlo ON ELI UT � N U n ~O Q d vy Z }^ �u U ❑ �pG❑ N��F�hl'1mh.➢�ff -o�LL��N�i Nowa og �ammaN �"' u]mm Ksa Gmm�m�.➢m0� �ri�mo"i Nemm�cmNm �nh�e�enm�N �NNnnaa �im�dNlo ON m h UT ���QNmmeNmmoa�amma a���rRnNmm�om N-mmNhon mO�wUNI'ld� J mwZ����NNI'IYNIOm W �idiNNN CY Or✓1 .➢1Jn yN ❑�wV MVI� W N f u V ANN Ou 0 ILL0 � ❑ )vmm N�mhv.m m U O Nm�mM1 m N O oh .Dd d O Nm �V 3.j4 Vl .G Wm !O oi"i ui-Nn�� a� U a EL mm-InmMcii O - hw❑3��idvim :,���Z���aminma-�nmam,nmmam fewHH�'in '44mN Q mRll G_ d � � SII ups UU CJ u❑ �mm�owmmn+�nonna vo -mmmmm Mo�ommoo�o�n 'nw �r'6 rum 66 of N W �. ]NNMduI � �Om�MID ❑rc Oi "]h�ON NMa ❑� U a �NNr]YY ❑ spa ❑�a zNmm�v ❑ Nam nmm n ~O Q d vy Z I o '-' o Fa=w>m�n a ❑ �mNamm"rmNmmvma0 u]mm NmmmmNd ON J ���QNmmeNmmoa�amma mO�wUNI'ld� W W �idiNNN CY yN MVI� W N f u V ILL0 � ❑ )vmm N�mhv.m Nm�mM1 m X a✓ mm-InmMcii O - hw❑3��idvim fewHH�'in '44mN Q mRll U3m d � � CJ u❑ �mm�owmmn+�nonna 'nw �r'6 rum 66 of Mi r. "s 4.tl' � ❑rc U NMa aYh a Q ❑ OL as a zNmw nmo�`��N 1 I LIG. I I N6, Standard Manhole for Standard Riprap Detail Standard Plate Library Standard Plate Library Storm Sewer � Catch Bann 03-05 Plate No. City of Monticello Date: 03-05 Plate No. City of Monticello Date: 03-05 Plate Na. ':03-17 0 4001 Revised: _ 4002 Revised; —15 4009 3 17 03 DATE: 6/3/2021 REVISED BY DATE HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, Prepared For:SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED CITY OF M MONTICELLO LAKE APAIR"TMENTS BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ENGINEERING DESIGNED MRW RESUBMITTAL ADB 0 18 AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED Baldur Real Estate, LLC OO SURVEYING RESUBMITTAL ADB11/29/202'WIIF-�IIGHT COUNTY MONTICELLO S PLATES PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF E=DRAWN ADB THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 19356 MEADOW RIDGE TRAIL N PLANNING RESUBMITTAL ADB 12/6/2021 MARINE ON ST. CROIX, MN 55047 Ph. 507867-1666 r 1 4 � MARK R WELCH 14070 Hwy 52 S.E. Fax 507-867-1665 CHECKED MRW RESUBMITTAL ADB 12/8/2022 BENCHMARK: ►J DATE X/X/XX REG. N0. 42736 www.gggFISHER — PUD ADB 2 14 2023 TOP NUT HYDRANT ON SCHOOL BOULEVARD 300' WEST OF cHE�JL FILE NO.: 20-408 LAYOUT 3 GP & CP Chatfield, MN 55923 / / THE INTERSECTION WITH EDMONSON AVENUE NE, ELEV:965.13 OF 15 SHEETS 1z• 3/4 ' /PER FT3. 1/2 R 1/2 R 3" �.} 7 -T L 2'- Q" MODIFIED DESIGN "D" 5 0- (TYPICAL) STANDARD FRAME & BOX FOR B618 CURB & GUTTER O m m MODIFIED DESIGN "D" CURB & 6618 � v GUTTER (TYPICAL. SEE ABOVE) o PLAN z MATCH MODIFIED DESIGN "D" CURB &GUTTER (TYPICAL) ° Rorgl� NOTE STORM SEWER TOP OF CASTING ELEVATION SHOWN ON THE PLANS INCLUDES A 0.10' DEPRESSION FROM THE PROPOSED CUTTER GRADE. THE CONCRETE CURB SHOULD BE TRANSITIONED FROM THE PROPOSED GUTTER GRADE TO THE CASTING ELEVATION 5 FEET ON EACH SIDE OF THE CENTER OF THE CASTING. AStanPlate Library City of Monticello BITUMINOUS TRAIL DESIGN OA — PATHWAY WIDTH 10 ft OB — SHOULDER WIDTH 1 ft MIN. 3" SP 9.5 WEARING 6' CL 5 AGGREGATE 12" SELECT GRANULA 6" MINIMUM SCARIFY (SUBGRADE PREP) FABRIC IF DIRECTED L. _....,__. NOTES: 1, TRAIL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WNH THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARD DETAIL PLATES. 2, PEDESTRIAN RAMPS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH TRUNCATED DOMES AND CONFORM TO ADA REQUIREMENTS. 3, MODIFY SURFACING, BASE, AND SUBGRADE DESIGN BASED ON EXPECTED VEHICULAR USE AND SUBGRADE SOILS. Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Title: Concrete Curb & Gutter at Catch Basin late' 03-05 Plate No. ReVie'd-03-15 5004 Title: Typical Trail Section )ate: 03-05 Plate No. Revised: 5 013 03-15 R,O,W PROPOSED UTILITY ,—CURB LINE 2' EXISTING UTILITY MILL 1 1/2 " BITUMINOUS TO LANE OR FOG LINE CURB LINE 2' EXISTING UTILITY CENTERLINE ROAD — MILL 1 1/2 " BITUMINOUS 2 FEET OUTSIDE OF EXCAVATION LIMITS OR AS DIRECTED BY ENGINEER BIT WEAR COURSE 2357 TACK COAT FULL DEPTH SAWCUT OF BITUMINOUS BASE WILL AND OVERLAY 2FT IS REQUIRED 1' AROUND EXCAVATION EDGE BEYOND EDGES OF EXCAVATION FOR BIT WEAR PLACEMENT BIT BASE COURSE 1' 1 1• CLASS 5 1, p p00—T-----�OAU�-d�Q 3• 100% STANDARD — PROCTOR DENSITY 95% STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY —_ —_ —_ EXCAVATION AREA (WIDTH VARIES) _ OSHA APPROVED SLOPES TO EXISTING UTILITY EXISTING UTILITY — Title: AStandard Plate Library Utility Excavation In City Streets 5 Years or Older City of Monticello Date:Q3_05 Plate No. Revised: Q3-1 7 7006 18' MIN �TANDARI STREET SECTION 60' NOTE: ISLAND CURB SHALL BE MODIFIED DESIGN "D" AS PER MONTICELLO DETAIL PLATE 5004 WITH MEDIAN NOSE AS PER MNDOT DETAIL PLATE 7113A 3'-4" (4" CURB) TOP OF FINISHED MEDIAN TOP OF FINISHED SURFACE PAVEMENT SURFACE 1: -. ,: -. 6"6" (+) HEIGHT TO TOP OF FISHED MEDIAN CONCRETE INFILL MODIFIED DESIGN "D" CURB AS PER MONTICELLO DETAIL PLATE 5004 --, 7 J M 6» m y A a d a -- �— MEDIAN NOSE AS PER MNDOT DETAIL—/ PLATE 1113A ATitle: Standard Plate Library Typical Concrete Median City of Monticello Date: 04-08 Plate No. Revised: 03 —15 5006 NOTE: MILL AND OVERLAY ALL EXCAVATION AREAS. THE LIMITS OF THE MILL AND OVERLAY SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: 1, MILL AND OVERLAY SHALL TAKE PLACE THE YEAR FOLLOWING EXCAVATION OPERATIONS 2. ALL AREAS SHALL BE MILLED 1-1/2" 3. ALL MILL AND OVERLAY SHALL BE TWICE THE WIDTH OF THE EXCAVATION MEASURED FROM EACH EDGE OF THE EXCAVATION LIMITS 4. ALL MILL AND OVERLAY SHALL BE FROM CENTERLINE OF ROAD TO THE FRONT EDGE OF CURB UNLESS EXCAVATION AREA ENCROACHES INTO THE OPPOSITE LANE OF TRAFFIC, THEN THE MILL AND OVERLAY SHALL INCLUDE THE RILL WIDTH OF THE STREET 5. MILLED AREA SHALL BE PERPENDICULAR TO THE CENTERLINE OF THE STREET 6. IF 3 OR MORE EXCAVATION AREAS OCCUR IN ONE BLOCK, THE ENTIRE BLOCK SHALL BE MILLED AND OVERLAYED R.O.W — CURB LINE (BOC) VA11ON AREA AND OVERLAY AREA — CENTERUNE ROAD SAWCUT BIT BASE 1' FROM EXCAVATION EDGE SAWCUT BIT WEAR 2' FROM EXCAVATION EDGE CURB LINE (BOC) — ..—..—..—. R.O.W — — — — — NOTE: MATCH THE EXISTING BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE THICKNESS OVERFILL THE EXISTING BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE THICKNESS 1/4' THE FOLLOWING YEAR THE AREA SHALL BE MILLED AND OVERLAY 2357 TACK COAT FULL DEPTH SAWCUT OF BITMINOUS BASE IS REQUIRED 1' AROUND EXCAVATION EDGE FULL DEPTH SAWCUT OF BTTMINOUS WEAR IS REQUIRED 2' AROUND EXCAVATION EDGE BIT WEAR 1' 1' COURSE WGI BIT BASE COURSE 1' 1. O �D T CLASS 5�'OLU�bcc) — 3• 1003 STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY 95% STANDARD PROCTOR _— —_ DENSNY —_ —_ —_ —_ EXCAVATION AREA {WIDTH VARIES) _ OSHA APPROVED SLOPES TO EXISTING UTILITY Title: AUtility Excavation in Streets Standard Plate Library that are Less than 5 Years Old City of Monticello Date: Plate No. 03-08 Revised: 03-17 7 7 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER n EXPANSION JOINTS EXPANSION JOINTS A B u 6' 4 y 4 CONCRETE TO BE EXPANSION POURED INTEGRALLY EXPANSION A JOINTS WITH CURB JOINTS /1 PLAN . �B618 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER d VARIABLE 114 PER /MIN � . 7" MIN. 7 �m �� 3/4 7" WIDTH VARIES 5' MIN. 1S" SECTION B—B SECTION A—A Title: Standard Plate Library Commercial Driveway Entrance City of Monticello Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised. 03-15 5008 NOTE: THIS DRAWING IS TYPICAL FOR ALL FLARED END SECTIONS 24" OR LARGER SHEET PILING AS SHOWN SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO FLARED END. NUTS AND BOLTS ON TRASH GUARD MUST REMAIN EXPOSED. 4000 PSI CONCRETE JSE (3) 1" BOLTS ABUTMENT l0 PSI CONCRETE #4 REBAR EACH FACE CONCRETE TO ATTACH TRASH GUARD ELEVATION Title: APiling for Flared Standard Plate Library End Section City of Monticello Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised: 03-17 4008 CONTRACTION JOINTS SIDEWALK DIMENSIONS WIDTH - 6' DEPTH — 6" FOR NEW DEVELOPMENTS *4" MINIMUM FOR EXISTING AREAS, 6" AT DRIVEWAYS AND CROSSWALKS GRANULAR BORROW DEPTH — 12" GRANULAR BORROW OR 6" CLASS 5 CONTRACTION JOINTS — 6' INTERVALS EXPANSION JOINTS — 60' INTERVALS (APPROX.) *MATCH EXISTING DEPTH, 4" MINIMUM INSTALL PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMPS AT ROADWAY INTERSECTIONS Title: Standard Plate Library Typical Sidewalk City of Monticello Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised: 03-17 5012 FACE OF CURB IS FLOWLINE OF CURB T r3/8" 28"R 66"R TOP OF BITUMINOUS MAT f 4 IIT } 6.5 A ,SLOPE 1/4" PER FOOT .. .. .. ... ........ .. .... .,. .. 3" MINIMUM iAGGREGATE BASE —F [^12" 17.5" 10.5" SURMOUNTABLE CURB NOTES: 1, FOR CATCH BASIN TRANSITIONS SEE PLATE NO, STR-07. 2. EXPANSION SHALL BE PLACED EVERY 200 LF, AT ALL CATCH BASIN TRANSITIONS, AND AT ALL BEGINNING RADII. 3. CONTRACTION JOINTS SHALL BE PLACED EVERY 10 FEET. 4, FOUR #4 REINFORCING RODS, TWO PER SIDE, AT ALL CATCH BASINS, MINIMUM 10 FEET. S. ONE #4 REINFORCING ROD IN FRONT OF CASTING, MINIMUM 5 FEET FOR SURMOUNTABLE CURB. CURB &GUTTER C1TY DR MVER GROVE ]EIGET PLATE NO. ENGIMR11 INC DEPARTMENT 1/17 STR-06 DATE: 6/3/2021 REVISED BY DATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED Prepared For: DESIGNED MRW RESUBMITTAL ADB10/18/202' CITY O MONTICELLO M LAKE A BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ENGINEERING AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED Baldur Real Estate, LLC O O SURVEYING RESUBMITTAL ADB11/29/202'V V �IGHT COUNTY MONTICELLO SPLATES PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF o DRAWN ADB �1 �1 1 � THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 19356 MEADOW RIDGE TRAIL N PLANNING RESUBMITTAL ADB 12/6/2021 MARINE ON ST. CROIX, MN 55047 Ph. 507867-1666 SHEET r� MARK R WELCH 4070 Hwy 52 S.E. Fax 507-867-1665 CHECKED MRW RESUBMITTAL ADB 12/8/2022 BENCHMARK: ►JHEEJL 15 DATE x/X/XX REG. N0. 42736 www.ggg1 FISHER — PUD ADB 2 14 2023 TOP NUT HYDRANT ON SCHOOL BOULEVARD 300' WEST OF FILE NO.: 20-408 LAYOUT 3 GP & CP Chatfield, MN 55923 / / THE INTERSECTION WITH EDMONSON AVENUE NE, ELEV:965.13 OF 15 SHEETS 0 0 WM WM WM— WM WM WM WM W1Gf 967 Wm dla.s1G WM WM — \ vim WM � WM WM WM WM WM WM ji UL UL— GL L — Lf) WM Ex i6• D I.P. W/M WM WM WM EDMONSON AVE NE — — — — GL GL GE (0 �C i — \ EDMONSON AVE NE -967 — — — — — — — — -965 1965- — — — — — — — — — 965 — o3 X1-- J _ I O --- 1 971 — �9----------- 97 rns 971 971 ---------- ---- — — — ----- \ 972 972 Z 973 —972 969 O 2 9_70 970 ' w I 968 X96 J / I - �/ o / IG w � ��,_'i'- N / / •� �O 9 I �. / < X00 O / / s ,r} 969 I POOL I L0 / O _ � l O / �� IaaeeeEDLlJ r U om j ,y,r 971 r _j _j El �° LEGEND i / s a WATER HYDRANT & GATE VALVE OO SANITARY MANHOLE Q STORM MANHOLE & CATCHBASIN c �O O s,aP V SIGNS 0 r d�, ° , O / / �� p m GAS VALVE Ifl COMMUNICATIONS BOX -962 o- C_Q, ELECTRIC POLE LIGHT POLE/WALL MOUNT LIGHT TREE • o / MAJOR CONTOUR 1 ' / MINOR CONTOUR WM WATERMAIN 9 I >• I 069> "19 96 1 °// O p SAN SANITARY SEWER — 9 � \ �,- � ` a �� � �G / •Z� �O 1 � STORM SEWER 96 • ° OVHE OVERHEAD ELECTRIC LINES d' ° �� UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINES O O / UNDERGROUND COMMUNICATIONS LINE r'• �p / `� Ix- RAILING, CHAINLINK FENCE GAS GAS LINE NNI�'� D� /C) 1 WATER SERVICE TILE DRAIN TILE / SUBDRAIN L i' i 1 PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOUR r _ \ � / � / PROPOSED MINOR CONTOUR — — — — — EASEMENT LINE IBITUMINOUS SURFACING Lc)o o o o > �� r /1 c) nm / a� CONCRETE SURFACING BUILDING \ I I I 1 1 LOT / �O �/ LANDSCAPING 000voovo O r ovoovoo I; B OCK 1 �� �O / PROPOSED BITUMINOUS SURFACING QVd WbO�SNMID TI ELL B \ `d SI PROPOSED CONCRETE SURFACING II I 971 970 EN ER IG�- --� - - - - 964 O SILT FENCE (PER STD. PLATE 6006) /� � �O � / GL GRADING LIMITS Ln X 1060.00 EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION X 1060.00 PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION 2.00% PROPOSED SLOPE 1 O INLET BARRIER �/ R PROPOSEDERO ION CONTROL BLANKET & 5) Pup4c / / I(PER MNDOT 3885 CAT. 3N 1 I \ \ \ I PAT WAY `� �� O O — / O PERK CON PLATE ON ENTRANCE �I \ \ \ / �• J O / I � / RIP RAP (PER STD. PLATE 4009) IIIQ GQ �(� ,ZOO p GRAPW SCALE SOD/VEGETATED FILTER STRIP II ��� 40 0 / 20 4V/ so RETAINING WALL O o BUFFERYARD LINE N I �/ \ 1 SCO�� (1N FEET) AGGREGATE SURFACING 1 [v = 40 NT / I� \ / BOULDER OR BIG BLOCK TRANSITION DATE: 6/3/2021 REVISED BY DATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, CITY OF MONTICELLO MONTICELLO LAKE APARTMENTS SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED Prepared For: BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ENGINEERING DESIGNED MRW RESUBMITTAL ADB 1 /17/202 AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED Badur Real Estate LLC be, OSURVEYING RESUBMITTAL ADB 12/6/2021 WRIGHT C0UNTY GRADING PLAN PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF DRAWN ADB THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 19356 MEADOW RIDGE TRAIL NPLANNING RESUBMITTAL ADB 6/8/2022 1 1 MARINE ON ST. CROIX, MN 55047 Ph. 507-867-1666 MARK R WELCH CHECKED MRW BENCHMARK: 4070 Hwy 52 S.E. Fax 507-867-1665 RESUBMITTAL ADB 12/9/2022 SHEET 1 DATE x�x�xx REG. No. 42736 WWW ggg t0 TOP NUT HYDRANT ON SCHOOL BOULEVARD 300' WEST OF FILE NO.: 20-408 LAYOUT 3 GP & CP Chatfield, MN 55923 FISHER - PUD ADB 2/14/2023 THE INTERSECTION WITH EDMONSON AVENUE NE, ELEV:965.13 OF 6 SHEETS o / GL - C[ - GL - GL -- 2 L LEGEND --- - - � - 55 _� �. 66'L i 66. ��• 6 66• fig- 6 ro � � � WATER HYDRANT &GATE VALVE i /; �� i 6 Ca 9 o OO Will SANITARY MANHOLE • / B.W. 965 - -- a TOP STORM MANHOLE & CATCHBASIN SIGNS r -962- - f - - - ----- --- - - ------- - - ------------------- � -- g - , �'�' 6' � � GAS VALVE `--964- - - - 1 rn 969 � • • rn 1.00% - � 1.00% �J Qj o -ELECTRIC COMMUNICATIONS BOX w 963- - I 65 - 971 2.00 r� °' �1 POLE LIGHT POLE/WALL TREE MOUNT LIGHT �AD 00 o O MAJOR CONTOUR 96 �_-_- -962- -- _ _ Ir °� _ -�=1 _�- �T �_ - - '_ _ _�I _ r e.W I L r- T. w. 9 5 �� X60 o 0.11 % + �� 9 1.80- 4. 1% I 96 .54 - WM SAN MINOR CONTOUR WATERMAIN SANITARY SEWER • ('L NOR BUILDING n I STORM SEWER - I -ern 6 ,0) 30 EET ACO 8" � ° N� 5 C C � TR CH DRAIN 6� CO OVHLC OVERHEAD ELECTRIC LINES ., 1 % GF 15 TE: 961.68 70FEET ACO 8 INV: 00 UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINES \ TRENCH DRAIN 100Y GRATE- 962.00 CP - UNDERGROUND COMMUNICATIONS LINE GRAPHIC SCALE .1 9 I p� �- ;, V c ] 1, q�6 961.\15�`y6: 7 J� sso.00 2 0 961.94+ 1 2 / I GAS RAILING, CHAINLINK FENCE GAS LINE 30 0 15 30 60 0 0U�O 4 -� \ ' W r - TILE WATER SERVICE DRAIN TILE / SUBDRAIN t C- _ w. 965. E 965.5 96 .43 PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOUR 69 - _ - F - J -------- PROPOSED MINOR CONTOUR (INFEET)- - 1 IN - 30 FT 0 1 EASEMENT LINE SURFACING a SBITUMINOUS l Li6 L 1 I ° 6 1 10I a a CONCRETE SURFACING I 2.00 0% 52 o 0 6 1 6 ��' XgX96 24p < BUILDING F L 1X9 6 X69'67/080 6 1.34 968.90 � I 1 S a c . � .03 �� � v°v°v°v° °°°°°°°° vvoovvoo LANDSCAPING 8 �° 2.000% 970 2. 0 % 60 1 I :, 96 1 o 0 PROPOSED BITUMINOUS SURFACING J 1 F 972.60 - o - o,`O �g N 96 0 I ,(nom ( j ib � Oz I PROPOSED CONCRETE SURFACING 973.321`1 O� 0 1 \ o C7 0 0 N A 2 0 0 / z c_ I I N 0,, 0 0'O S a C S ��� 4 X968.13 g6�o� I I 67. �9 0"GI < I SILT FENCE (PER STD. PLATE 6006) GRADING LIMITS CD p 6a. I I o 2. 0% 0% \ 0� I �9 z I X 1060.00 EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION 6 g6 8 I w 96-20 X 10600.00 PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION u 0 9 9 2. 9 6 g �� ° PROPOSED SLOPE 1 °u /9 � INLET (PER STD. PLATE 6004 & 5) / J : 1 � 9 06 0 I ROPOSEDRIER EROSION CONTROL BLANKET o � (PER MNDOT 3885 CAT. 3N) / ° 2.00% 2.10% _ or r I ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 1 2.00% 7 0 967.00 r 0,6 rn -) rn I (PER STD. PLATE 6002 & 3) 0 0 p 2.0 0X967.61 �°6lX967.9 I `� RIP RAP (PER STD. PLATE 4009) C 7 o N 0 'o O n v 0 1 I X967.51 �g6967.9 1 d I SOD/VEGETATED FILTER STRIP cV �. IIS 0 0 j 96 D9 1 i - - ° JII eo Q I © �-�' (98 i w RETAINING WALL 2.0 -° I- 2 I BUFFERYARD LINE Lj � 0 EL I 32-966 966 6 .196 1 AGGREGATE SURFACING � 1 L Iv) I � I 9 7.00 967. 6� BOULDER OR BIG BLOCK TRANSITION m C-)0,10 = 9 9. 7/ i C1 I l 96 E` 7 I < 00, 13 B ° 1 I o g6 X967.4 rn m � I 4.0 Lcn I h ' X966.0 I 96 7' g I 100YR I r HWL: 966.24 - ^I 969.57 l (u i\% M U N I 2.0 0 - I 0 --j °, 99� 00 0 'I ,6\°�_D I (� I I J G - �C/ 4 2.0 o v �� R o I ' AEE. 91,-%'. oc � t . 9 6 7.5 96 10 _ 96 .134 1 �� I �0) 01 I I 1 .47 c I 2.00% L� _ - ,� C �� _ = 967.00. 3 �6 966 I HWL: 966.09 1 rn 42 .� 9 c�rL, o g67•p0 - - 7n 10 ; < ° o ,, B 1 96 LOT 1 N 0 15 968.65 BLOCK 1 / �F8 8 LF 1 RCP - - - - - - - 51, ' C _ 6, 6E� a Lj N � �9 E.O.: _ -I 1. 1 I' .0 I IT ° 1 pilo 6 "-� I ��� X80 g$ 9 s ce // 967.36 66 p 2.00% D<<O 96 32 - �� 1 .00 E LOPMEN 8.0 SIGN 10. O 96 0 GL w� `II _ 96 .68 ��X966.57n�F �F _ 9.81 LF 15 �.���... '� ° _ J I 0 r O HDPE @1 67% J I Ip I �• - X66- 9,66-.4: 6.�r7X9 5.95 967.56 Q 9 20 66.13 96 . 6� _,,,--------------------- 0 966 .50 E.0.:966. �. `pe?; ;`� 6.01 1 l I ` oo `O - 21.36 RCP @0. 96 J lLnw I 3O v s 506 1 a 61.68 61.8 ._66."'2 966.6 y �s - - - �,- - - 64.01 - - - 400YR 66.95 a' c� 1 .s c CLAS II I RAP I Q _ °Jo -' - 966.87 s r� `� S s ° rn L: 965.6`0 2 LG9�� GTti 966. 6j " C 966.6200 96 d I r ' P&RF RTE ED4 I NG I ~ 2 E ATE 0/ ` F & H s_6 1 , 5 14 F " CP © 1 0 % PRE s qi .0 4.1 s.o :-..e'tv '90 �9 ° w• 96 j S �� T X X 6 �I '\ 96 4 I ' .39 HE ER E$ N. 1.92%^��' �,, _ ss 1 i rn 1 0R I H L 9E0.46 6.19 ��• �.�o, 9 °;o ps, •91 ��' � Of X96. 7 67. � 100YR °' �I 'I i F-I m •g �• I 9 r S 32 968.73 6� HWL: 965.60 1 I 1.00 61. � .84 0 o ' \ V 1 1 4.0q 0' 1 '966. 21 c-) F- 61 0 6, \ o \, g I 40' c X I � �� i u XE. 6 .� 61.00 . ! 0�0 \ �_ 6. ` 7 �8 X96.. 1 X s A: +so.o S L 952.50 Alll IPR I �9 1 • 0 J I 7 • , O c0 03' in �, O� 6� / ��° O��� \' 968. 0.: : 1 1 67. / ca• � J O c(T)I F- L L 0 F&I F E E DPI NG CD g II � � 1 0 � �/ �. "* ` r �J/ PER AT 08 �C HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, DATE: 6/3/2021 Prepared Far: REVISED BY DATE CITY OF M MONTICELLO LAKE APARTMENTS SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED Baldur Real Estate, LLC o ENGINEERING SURVEYING DESIGNED MRW RESUBMITTAL ADB 11 17 2021 / / WJDL�JGHT CO�JNTYPROFESSIONAL GRADING P RESUBMITTAL ADB 12/6/2021 ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 19356 MEADOW I I J I O O RIDGE TRAIL N ��� PLANNING DRAWN ADB RESUBMITTAL ADB 6/8/2022 MARK R WELCH MARINE ON ST. CROIX, MN 55047 14070 Hwy52 S.E. Ph. 507-867-1666 Fax 507-867-1665 CHECKED MRW RESUBMITTAL ADB 12/9/2022 BENCHMARK: SHEET cHE E T x/x/xx 42736 DATE REG. No. FILE NO.: 20-408 LAYOUT 3 GP & OP Chatfield, MN 55923 WWW•ggg•to TOP THE NUT HYDRANT INTERSECTION ON SCHOOL BOULEVARD 300' WEST OF WITH EDMONSON AVENUE NE, ELEV:965.13 OF 6 SHEETS FISHER - PUD ADB 2/14/2023 L • • all • • •,, ♦ ` • �, 1 •• ♦9PON-00001 PPANIVIN-A r.• ,• • EVE • ••• •. •• �. •,ems , • �- moi. �t� �`. �, �; ,, � - - ,,•1.. � ,, �`� �� � � • �I .111 •, �' • �i=''� �' =��� �lE � 22 •• � • • . 1 �P\`J�,\\ ^f, r���1,, •�' , ,1 �` • • • t loll , v> S tX i oo c LEGEND WATER HYDRANT & GATE VALVE \\ \ O SANITARY MANHOLE n� OO STORM MANHOLE & CATCHBASIN 6' `�� 51°`� SIGNS GV do p� pd GAS VALVE - D COMMUNICATIONS BOX \�\ co \ o�� \ o C-0 ELECTRIC POLE LIGHT POLE/WALL MOUNT LIGHT 6, 1 01 TREE m 0 C� �� MAJOR CONTOUR MINOR CONTOUR 9 j t`• c) \ WM WATERMAIN SAN SANITARY SEWER STORM SEWER OVHE OVERHEAD ELECTRIC LINES UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINES UNDERGROUND COMMUNICATIONS LINE RAILING, CHAINLINK FENCE \ ` \ GAS GAS LINE WATER SERVICE \ \ \ 7 TILE — DRAIN TILE / SUBDRAIN \ �y PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOUR �� \\ coo �o PROPOSED MINOR CONTOUR C – — — — — — — – EASEMENT + \ 0-) �� r D� GRAPHIC SCALE BITUMINOUS SURFACING \ \ LO \\ 30 0 15 30 60 a a \ a CONCRETE SURFACING BUILDING 0) \ °�� \ \ IN FEET °°°°°°°° C ( ) °°°°°°°° LANDSCAPING I IN= 30 FT CD \ PROPOSED BITUMINOUS SURFACING PROPOSED CONCRETE SURFACING SILT FENCE (PER STD. PLATE 6006) / S G/ GRADING LIMITS \ D� p 0-1/� X 1060.00 EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION �` \ m \ y� X 1060.00 PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION 2.00% PROPOSED SLOPE INLET BARRIER (PER STD. PLATE 6004 & 5) PROPOSED EROSION CONTROL BLANKET �� ® (PER MNDOT 3885 CAT. 3N) \ ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE S \(PER STD. PLATE 6002 & 3) \ RIP RAP (PER STD. PLATE 4009) �Z \ �� 1 \ SOD/VEGETATED FILTER STRIP 1 • 0 \ �� ra RETAINING WALL BUFFERYARD LINE `Z` \ AGGREGATE SURFACING BOULDER OR BIG BLOCK TRANSITION '0 —� o(b o° i p o �� 0 17 spat s o 96) % 0 00��01� X 01 9 0 86 \ of +�� �� 2.00% C](J:�,gyp • T� d sd 6� �O 0 9 5p oo .Qc o \ LJ \ I 1 �p 13 LPF% 17 1 6 ' 1 - - - - ANSFORM R g6 \ o o PAD &00 I970 ro g65 J \•°'� ��P �� \ c9 , 0 v 968 `�' � � � � h �'� 9� � BASIN ED -2 m \ \ 0. �. X. �� 959.0 100YR HWL: 960.9 I 0 966 &I 100. 0 L 18" RCS' .50% ,> \ F&I 460.00 LF 18 RCP \ H 0 H 0 -HAO HAO HAO HAO 111A0 ------------ iAO HAO H 0 gi�18 —�3 ACS3t+/AV F�-- 0 HAO ----- AO �HAO �HAO HAO H A �\ H D A 0 - --- ------ _ -- - ---------' �--- i- -- ------ ----- - - - - - - � ---- - U AO AO HAO �HAO �HAO �HAO �HAO HAO �HAO HA'5 —�HA0 -HA-0 HAO �HAO HAO �HAO �HAO �HAO �HAO �HAO �HA O _AO _ -�IHAO �HAO ] AO AO IHAOHAO SHA 0FAD � / H HA � HA HAO O �HAO �HAO �HAO �HAO �HAO �HAO �HAO �HAO �HAO HAO HAO �H�_ �H A. DATE: 6/3/2021 REVISED BY DATE HEREBY AN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED Prepared For: CITY OF MONTICELLO MONTICELLO SAKE APARTMENTS \ ' ENGINEERING RESUBMITTAL ADB 11/17/2021 BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION DESIGNED MRW AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED Baldur Real Estate, LLC o SURVEYING RESUBMITTAL ADB 12/6/2021 CO�JNTYPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF u O O DRAWN ADB WJDL�.IGHT GRADING P THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 19356 MEADOW RIDGE TRAIL N PLANNING RESUBMITTAL ADB 6/8/2022 MARINE ON ST. CROIX, MN 55047 Ph. 507-867-1666 c MARK R WELCH y CHECKED MRW RESUBMITTAL ADB 12/9/2022 BENCHMARK: SHEET x/x/xx 42736 14070 Hwy 52 S.E. Fax 507-867-1665 DATE REG. No. WWW•ggg.to TOP NUT HYDRANT ON SCHOOL BOULEVARD 300' WEST OF FILE NO.: 20-408 LAYOUT 3 GP & CP Chatfield, MN 55923 FISHER - PUD ADB 2/14/2023 THE INTERSECTION WITH EDMONSON AVENUE NE, ELEV:965.13 OF 6 SHEETS I � 0 WM WM WM WM WM WM WM W — WM HIM 'd'I'0 „91 x3 WM WM WM _ _ � WM WM WM Ij WM WM WM L I WM Ex is" D.I.P. W/M PNM WM WM EDMONSON AVE NE LGL GL GL — C C� 194- — \ EDMONSON AVE NE --�CL UL 77 _ — 0 L`�- � \ , � \ z o -- - � � 1 \ � — c X31 — — — — - _ — i I — ✓ - ��l X38 J - ------ --- Hno HAD p aZ o N I w I IKk / S spds a POOL I I S • / ° ° .� �� I - U) O / c I u I I Q O eases `4 I _ omSao //'� �� p LEGEND Q r�� o I /s i / �� ',0,,'WATER HYDRANT & GATE VALVE � E I / OO SANITARY MANHOLE II '� / �� O OO STORM MANHOLE & CATCHBASIN L - I / �SIGNS GV I II I I ° �\ / / ��O O GAS VALVE • I M` = / (] COMMUNICATIONS BOX I I II _ /gyp - o- `� ELECTRIC POLE LIGHT POLE/WALL MOUNT LIGHT _a I o ` / .�� O TREE .0U.- • MINOR CONTOUR � � � WM WATERMAIN NIS/ O SAN SANITARY SEWER STORM SEWER OVHE OVERHEAD ELECTRIC LINES UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINES UNDERGROUND COMMUNICATIONS LINE I �r� 1 s c% 1 d, � � J // �� O � RAILING, CHAINLINK FENCE S1 \ I o / �� / GAS GAS LINE /O 1 WATER SERVICE •l/�,-� .•�� / �� ° / / PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOUR — L _� _ — — — — — — — — — PROPOSED MINOR CONTOUR I �t r1l � � ��� ��'•,,j p/O � / EASEMENT LINE o Io �• — E •� ° /.�� ° / BITUMINOUS SURFACING CONCRETE SURFACING BUILDING o o ]o 3 o E I1wLANDSCAPING I -I t ILT I P i \ l 1 BOCK 1 p�0 / � PROPOSED BITUMINOUS SURFACING uvd l waOjSNd MO TI ELL SI � EN ER IG // `�_ / \ � PROPOSED CONCRETE SURFACING --- --- ---------------- --- ---- -- — p SILT FENCE (PER STD. PLATE 6006) GL GRADING LIMITS X 1060.00 EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION X 1060.00 PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION 2.00% PROPOSED SLOPE INLET\ \ (PER STD. PLATE 6004 P U I C / 1 �� ,ZOO / ► PROPOS EDRIER EROSION CONTROL BLANKET & 5) \ II I I \ \ / ° (PER MNDOT 3885 CAT. 3N) 1 l \ \ I PA 1 � ✓ �\\ � O / 0 ROCK TD. PLA EUCTION 3 'WAY) RIP RAP (PER STD. PLATE 4009) II o I �° p / — \ GRAPHIC SCA SOD/VEGETATED FILTER STRIP �O 40 0 / 20 80 RETAINING WALL BUFFERYARD LINE AGGREGATE SURFACING 1 l I I\ I ° O / (IN FEET) 1 IN= 40 FT BOULDER OR BIG BLOCK TRANSITION DATE: 6/3/2021 REVISED BY DATEN I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, Pre pared For: CITY OF M O TtCELL0 LAKE AT��� \�ENTS SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED P BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ENGINEERING DESIGNED MRW RESUBMITTAL ADB 11/17/2021 AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED Baldur Real Estate, LLC 0 O SURVEYING DRAWN ADB RESUBMITTAL ADB 12/6/2021 WIRItIGHT COUNTY EDOSION CONTQOL `LAN L/� 1�TPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF o 1� 1 \y THE STATE of MINNESOTA. 19356 MEADOW RIDGE TRAIL N PLANNING RESUBMITTAL ADB 6/8/2022 MARINE ON ST. CROIX, MN 55047 Ph. 5078671666 c MARK R WELCH y CHECKED MRW RESUBMITTAL ADB 12/9/2022 BENCHMARK: SHEET 4 x/x/xx 42736 14070 Hwy 52 S.E. Fax 507-867-1665 DATE REG. N0. WWWggg•t0 FISHER -PUD ADB 2 14 2023 TOP NUT HYDRANT ON SCHOOL BOULEVARD 300' WEST OF FILE NO.: 20-408 LAYOUT 3 GP & CP Chatfield, MN 55923 / / THE INTERSECTION WITH EDMONSON AVENUE NE, ELEV:965.13 OF 6 SHEETS GENERAL EROSION CONTROL AND CONSTRUCTION NOTES: LEGEND 1) PLACE MACHINE SLICED SILT FENCE AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS AND WHERE DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER, AT TOE OF FILL SLOPES AND MAINTAIN UNTIL TURF HAS BEEN WELL ESTABLISHED. (INSTALLATIONyo WATER HYDRANT &GATE VALVE H OF SILT FENCE MUST TAKE PLACE PRIOR TO DISTURBING THE WATERSHED). INSTALL AND MAINTAIN INLET PROTECTION AT ALL CATCHBASINS AND INLETS LOCATED WITHIN THE PROJECT AND IMMEDIATELY OO SANITARY MANHOLE DOWNSTREAM OF THE PROJECT. OWill 510P— STORM MANHOLE & CATCHBASIN PROJECT CALCULATIONS: SIGNS 2) CONSTRUCT AND MAINTAIN TEMPORARY ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE AT ALL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES USED DURING CONSTRUCTION TO CONTROL SEDIMENT FROM LEAVING SITE PER ROCHESTER STD. TOTAL PROJECT AREA: 10.73 ACRES Gv GAS VALVE PLATE 7-06, CLOSE OTHER ENTRANCES WITH SILT FENCE. TOTAL DISTURBED AREA: 13.16 ACRES 111 COMMUNICATIONS BOX 3) REMOVE ALL TOPSOIL AND ORGANIC MATERIAL. STOCKPILE IN APPROVED LOCATIONS ON—SITE. PROVIDE PERIMETER CONTROL AROUND ALL STOCKPILES. PROVIDE TEMPORARY COVER IF STOCKPILE WILL BE EXISTING IMPERVIOUS: 0.47 ACRES o- `Q.) ELECTRIC POLE LIGHT POLE/WALL MOUNT LIGHT INPLACE MORE THAN 14 DAYS. NEW IMPERVIOUS: 5.74 ACRES TREE 4) ALL EXCAVATED MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED ON SITE AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER OR HAULED TO AN APPROVED LOCATION. ANY TEMPORARY STOCKPILES SHALL HAVE SILT FENCE INSTALLED AROUND TOTAL IMPERVIOUS: 6.21 ACRES MAJOR CONTOUR MINOR CONTOUR THE DOWN SLOPE EDGE TO PREVENT DOWNSTREAM SEDIMENTATION. TEMPORARY COVER SHALL BE ESTABLISHED AFTER 14 DAYS. WETLANDS: 0.00 ACRES WM WATERMAIN 5) ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREAS MUST BE STABILIZED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE TO LIMIT SOIL EROSION BUT IN NO CASE LATER THAN SEVEN (7) DAYS AFTER THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IN THAT PORTION OF THE RIGHT OF WAY: 1.54 ACRES SAN SANITARY SEWER SITE HAS TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED.STORM OVHE SEWER OVERHEAD ELECTRIC LINES 6) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ROUTINELY INSPECT THE CONSTRUCTION SITE ONCE EVERY 7 DAYS DURING ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION AND WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER A RAINFALL EVENT GREATER THAN 0.5 INCHES IN UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINES 24 HOURS. ALL INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE CONDUCTED DURING CONSTRUCTION MUST BE RECORDED IN WRITING. UNDERGROUND COMMUNICATIONS LINE ^ RAILING, CHAINLINK FENCE 7) THIS PROJECT DOES REQUIRE AN NPDES PERMIT BASED ON AREA DISTURBED AND DOES REQUIRE A PERMANENT STORM WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM/TREATMENT DUE TO THE INCREASE IN IMPERVIOUS GAS GAS LINE SURFACING BEING MORE THAN ONE ACRE. A SWPPP HAS BEEN PREPARED FOR THIS PROJECT AND SHALL BE PART OF THESE PLANS. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES BEYOND WHAT MAY BE SHOWN ON IMPAIRED/SPECIAL WATERS WITHIN ONE MILE: WATER SERVICE THIS PLAN OR WITHIN THE SWPPP SHOULD BE CONSIDERED IF GRADING CAUSES EROSION NOT CONTAINED BY MEASURES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN. NONE DRAIN TILE / SUBDRAIN PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOUR 8) RESPREAD TOPSOIL (4" MIN.), FERTILIZE, SEED, & DISK ANCHOR MULCH ALL DISTURBED AREAS. SOD OR SEED WITH MNDOT MIXTURE 25-131 WITH THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONS. PROPOSED MINOR CONTOUR FERTILIZER SHALL BE 24-12-24 AND BE APPLIED AT A RATE OF 300 LBS/ACRE. - — — — — — — - EASEMENT LINE MIXTURE 25-131 SEEDING SHALL BE APPLIED AT A RATE OF 220 LBS/ACRE. BITUMINOUS SURFACING MIXTURE 33-261 SEEDING SHALL BE APPLIED AT A RATE OF 35 LBS/ACRES. (STORMWATER FACILITIES) a ° a CONCRETE SURFACING MULCH SHALL BE APPLIED AT A RATE OF 2 TONS/ACRE. BUILDING *THE SEASON FOR SEEDING SHALL BE FROM APRIL 1ST — JUNE 1ST AND JULY 20TH — SEPTEMBER 20TH, AND AS DORMANT SEEDING AFTER NOV. 1ST. ONLY TEMPORARY SEEDING WILL BE ALLOWED SEPT. OWNER 20TH — NOV. 1ST) (REFERENCE MNDOT SEEDING MANUAL FOR ADDITIONAL SEEDING INFORMATION) BALDUR REAL ESTATE, LLC 00000 o000o LANDSCAPING 9) TEMPORARY SEED WITH MNDOT MIX 22-111 (MAY 1ST THRU AUGUST 1ST) OR MNDOT MIX 22-112 (AUGUST 1ST THRU OCTOBER 1ST) AT A RATE OF 100LB/ACRE. INCLUDING DISK ANCHORED MULCH ON 19356 MEADOW RIDGE TRAIL N PROPOSED BITUMINOUS SURFACING ALL SLOPES GREATER THAN 200' OR 5%. MARINE ON ST. CROIX, MN 55047 10) PER CURRENT MPCA REQUIREMENTS. CONCRETE WASHOUTS, WHICH PROHIBIT WASHOUT LIQUID AND SOLID WASTES FROM CONTACTING THE GROUND AND ENTERING THE GROUNDWATER, MAY BE; APPROVED PROPOSED CONCRETE SURFACING ENGINEER & SURVEYOR FACILITIES OFFSITE, PORTABLE ONSITE FACILITIES, OR FACILITIES CONSTRUCTED ONSITE. ON SITE CONSTRUCTED FACILITIES SHALL HAVE A LEAK—PROOF, IMPERMEABLE LINER AND FOLLOW THE CUBED INC. CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE AND REMOVAL PROCESSES AS RECOMMENDED ON THE MPCA WEBSITE (HTTP: //WWW.PCA.STATE.MN.US/PUBLICATIONS/WQ—STRM2-24.PDF). SILT FENCE (PER STD. PLATE 6006) 14 14070 H WY. 52 SE 11) OWNER HAS BEEN MADE AWARE THAT THERE ARE DESIGN SLOPES LESS THAN 2% AND ACCEPTS ANY ISSUES THAT MAY RESULT FROM THIS DESIGN. CHATFIELD, MN 55923 G GRADING LIMITS 12) SLOPES STEEPER THAN 4:1 AND 4:1 SLOPES LONGER THAN 30' ARE SEEDED AND PROTECTED WITH EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS OR SODDED AND STAKED. BLANKET CATEGORY 3N PER MNDOT 3885. markw@ggg.to X 1060.00 x 1060.00 EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION SLOPES STEEPER THAN 4:1 ARE STABLE FROM LAND—SLIDING AND SURFACE EROSION. 2 00% PROPOSED SLOPE 13) MINIMIZE CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC OVER UNPAVED AREAS OF THE SITE. � INLET BARRIER (PER STD. PLATE 6004 & 5) PROPOSED EROSION CONTROL BLANKET 14) MAINTENANCE ACCESS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 12—FEET WIDE WITH 10% MAX SIDE SLOPES (PER MNDOT 3885 CAT. 3N) C� ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE O (PER STD. PLATE 6002 & 3) Specifications in Monticello RIP RAP (PER STD. PLATE 4009) 15) GOVERNING SPECIFICATIONS — THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO STANDARD DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS. THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 'STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION" SUBJECT TO ANY AMENDMENTS. ALONG WITH ANY DESIGN CRITERIA LOCATED WITHIN THE WRIGHT COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE. UNLESS ABBREVIATIONS DEFINED: SOD/VEGETATED FILTER STRIP OTHERWISE SPECIFIED WITHIN THIS PLAN. HP: HIGH POINT 16) CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL UTILITY CONNECTION PERMITS FROM THE CITY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. LP: LOW POINT RETAINING WALL E0: EMERGENCY OVERFLOW BUFFERYARD LINE AGGREGATE SURFACING G. F.: GARAGE FLOOR F. F.: FIRST FLOOR BOULDER OR BIG BLOCK TRANSITION INFILTRATION/WQV BASIN TYPICAL SECTION (NOT TO SCALE) BOUNCE PARKING/DRIVE EMERGENCY OVERFLOW 6.25% IMPERVIOUS (ELEVATION VARIES) (VARIES) NEENAH R-4324 GRATE 6•�'� 12" ��`P�L RIBBON CURB 9� cVEGETATED FILTER STRIP (15'-25' WIDE) 6"-12" TOPSOIL POORLY GRADED SAND STORMWATER CONTROL STRUCTURE DATE: 6/3/2021 REVISED BY DATE HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, CITY OF MONTICELLO MONTICELLO LAKE APARTMENTS SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED Prepared Far: ENGINEERING RESUBMITTAL ADB 11 17 2021 BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION DESIGNED MRW / / AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED Baldur Real Estate, LLC SURVEYING RESUBMITTAL ADB 12/6/2021 WRIG][�T COUNTY PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF u O O DRAWN ADB G"AT) PLAN THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 19356 MEADOW RIDGE TRAIL N PLANNING RESUBMITTAL ADB 6/8/2022 MARINE ON ST. CROIX, MN 55047Q Ph. 507-867-1666 c MARK R WELCH y CHECKED MRW RESUBMITTAL ADB 12/9/2022 BENCHMARK: SHEET x/x/xx 42736 14070 Hwy 52 S.E. Fax 507-867-1665 DATE REG. No. WWW.ggg.to TOP NUT HYDRANT ON SCHOOL BOULEVARD 300' WEST OF FILE NO.: 20-408 LAYOUT 3 GP & CP Chatfield, MN 55923 FISHER - PUD I ADB 2/14/2023 THE INTERSECTION WITH EDMONSON AVENUE NE, ELEV:965.13 OF 6 SHEETS Gravel pad(s) MnDOT Class CA -15 Bedding WIN NU or CA -25 IovERFLow slor IN SHROUD E o Geotextile fabric Original DlsruRBen AREA, �¢ m� ATTACHMENT HOOK grade CONSTRUCTION SITE, lI i L o STABILIZED STORAGE I AREA OR STAGING AREA SILT FABRIC SLEEVE SECTION B -B PER MnDOT SPECIAL a� 010 I (not t0 scale) EXISTING CURB • , PROVISION 3886 p^ li' EXISTING OVERFLOW IS OF • ® • w x PAVED 12' MIN CGNSTRUCTIDN MATS, WOVEN OR TRM THE CURB BOX HEIGHT 1 0 0 0 0 1 III Ribbed Or Carni ated steel plates 9 P ROADWAY ® ® w r o y a V 41 50' MIN L�1-I �o>3'z III N` QC_OOriginal -'�WwN°GeOte%tie fabric SECTION A -A grade END ❑VERLAP o�oo ~ (not to scale) ^18' MIN Zzzq aV om t5 mw Iii 11 NOTES: $SDE OVERLAP s- ` ° m a �" xa II LLt PLAN -4 w�o� zw ME �w II' H- o�Do. ao wy ma Z WIMCC ROAD DRAIN CG -23* HIGH FLOWwUF 4gW w�- xW oChonnelize runoff to sediment Sediment TraPPing Device INLET PROTECTION CURB AND GUTTER MODEL DEFLECTOR PLATE ' trapping device OR CITY APPROVED EQUAL. 15 II Y V) # w TRM END OVERLAP WITH SPIKES OR STAKES 2 rn II v E OVERFLOW IS OF .a a~ 0w THE CURB BOX HEIGHT YY •.....................• V w�JZ rrK Wq l NyKj O STRAP OVERFLOW AT TOP OF ��� 8 s U, N< WQ rN W CONNECTORS ?°mom Tia J- ISS �_ v� O FILTER ASSEMBLY w C a: �+ �° �F ro o Z qax JW W= W ��v'a H- �,rli c� rrc zW w3 mina m U URB w Ri- za6JJw�+D 72IS � d` 14 iCONSTRUCTION MAT END OVERLAP INTERLOCK WITH mqy F - p o STRAP CONNECTORS aa�cF n zm ww �� Q o 0:D z- `�� 11 °v U / ry Ribbed or Corrugated steel plates °Nam I'm Ng o Z4 �j m� zp am c O cv "zz a a z o� ml•' 2w afi [.1a Iii R a END OVERLAP 4z ��� DE o� B C, III cry m� -I o x = a m Iii w 0 V OVERFLOW SLOT IN SHROUD k�o� �a Fi a wS $ V z wN-'= CD FILTER ASSEMBLY SILT FABRIC SLEEVE 4��2 3wR) im� F mW WO �¢ OU �x W IF d©Off o W i1 PER OT SPECIAL " m° SIDE 'OISI s_o TU,ooW 0AT LOW POINT OVERLAP vl a I f HIGH-FLOW FABRIC ma<a N Mi Ili r ¢ * FOR THE NEW R -3290 -VB STANDARD $mo=w 77 5�Z B X > CGS 3290 10R CITYNSTALL IMCO z a i i 1 24' min. v o =3- wz Sloe awa from o a V,& o o-. L- I highway m �,J� zali c�5 "wpm Iii a X I P y a�85 CA wz *a z Ni 3 s G ijr J i„ I to 50' Iain, PAD AREA (ANY SIZE) y� T,� ao 19 Match Or Right Of Way wHo A CALL TO GOPHER STATE ONE (454-0002) ExlSting yy���nixm 15 REOUIRLD A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS Crude PLAN PRIOR TO PERFORMING ANY EXCAVATION. Title. Commercial Gravel Title. Title. Inlet Protection Title: Title: g Mud Mat Entrance Inlet Protection Residential Building Standard Plate Library Construction Entrance AStandard Plate Library 4Standard Plate Library Standard Plate Library Grate Inlet Cover Standard Plate Library Erosion Control Catch Bann Insert � Cit of Monticello Date: Plate No. City of Monticello Date: _ Plate No. City of Monticello Date: _ Plate No. City of Monticello Date: Plate No. City of Monticello Date: Plate No. y 03-05 ARevlsed:03-15 6002 Re�ised:06_14 6003 Revised:03-07 6004 Revised: 03— 6005 Revised: 6006 03-15 03-15 03-15 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. MARK R WELCH DATE X/X/XX REG. N0. 42736 DATE: 6/3/2021 Prepared For: Baldur Real Estate, LLC 19356 MEADOW RIDGE TRAIL N MARINE ON ST. CROIX, MN 55047 FILE NO.: 20-408 LAYOUT 3 GP & CP 14070 Hwy 52 S.E. Chatfield, MN 55923 ENGINEERING SURVEYING PLANNING Ph. 50T867-1666 Fax 507-867-1665 www.ggg.to DESIGNED MRW DRAWN ADB CHECKED MRW REVISED RESUBMITTAL RESUBMITTAL RESUBMITTAL RESUBMITTAL FISHER — PUD BY DATE CITY OF MONTICELLO ADB 11/17/2021 ADB 12/6/2021 COUNTY ADB 6/8/2022 WIF"IGHT ADB 12/9/2022 BENCHMARK: 14 TOP NUT HYDRANT ON SCHOOL BOULEVARD 300' WEST OF ADB 2/14/2023 / / THE INTERSECTION WITH EDMONSON AVENUE NE, ELEV:965.13 ISI WI�I I� I�1 IICN�YII� STANDAlk'M PLATES SHEET 6 OF 6 SHEETS Emergency spillway crest D let POINT �AN OI P1 aO� 010 3.3' 20" 1.6, • • Anti seepage collar (typ.) 3.3. 3.3' STAKE TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION BASIN WITH OUTLET PIPE STRAW D FIBER J G' To ]' CIA. ROLL ENCLOSED IN 0.7 STAPLES PER SO. YO. 1.15 STAPLES PER SGL YD. 3.15 STAPLES PER So. YD. PLASTIC OR POLYESTER NETTING 4:1 SLOPES S_t$LOPE$ HIGH FLOW CHANNFLS SHORELINE DITCH TYPE 2Use BIOROLLON Emergency spillway crest ROUGH RA ED ! Perforated et Standpipe �: 1" X 2" X 18" LONG WOODEN STAKES AT 1' 0" SPACING MAXIMUM. STAKES SHALL BE ' PI DRIVEN THROUGH THE RACK HALF CF THE SIOROLL AT AN ANGLE OF 45 DEGREES WITH THE TOP OF THE STAKE POINTING UPSTREAM. B[OROLL PROVIDE 8" TO 10' Or EMBEDMENT DEPTH. 3B Anti seepage C011ar (typ.) — 45 -- 45• TEMPORARY SLDIMENTATION BASIN FLOW B' - 10' EMBEDMENT DEPTH I_ WITH STAND PIPE OUTLET 3A ¢ Emergency spillway O SIOROLL STAKING DETAIL e Perforate standpipe —1` ENTRENCH A MINIMUM OF 2' 5 3/4" rook cane 7— t, PREPPRE 501E BEFORE INSTALLING BLANKETS. INCLUPING ANY NECESSARY APPLICATION OF LIME, FERTILIZER, PNP SEED. 2. BEGIN ATTHETOPOFTHE SLOPE BYANCHORINGTHE BLANKET INAB'(15-1)DEEPX6'Il v) WIDETRENCH .. 1\ WITH APPROXIMATELY IF (30 - OF BLANKET EXTENDED BEYOND THE JI PORTION OF THE TRENCH. ANCHOR THE V * 1/3 Z a BLANKETWTHAROW OFSTAPLE TAIIESAFFROXINA7ELY12-(3 ) APART INTHE ROTIDMOFTHETRENGH BACKFILLANOCOMPACTTHETRENCHAFTERSTAPLING. APPLY SEED TO COMPACTED SCIL AND FOLD REMAINING I2{301.m) 1° holes spored 8N to 10° on center PORTON OF BLANKET BACK OVER SEED AND COMPAOTED$OIL. SECUREBI-ET OVER COMPACTED SOIL WITH ARO.OF STAPLE TAKES SPACED APPROXIMATELY IF (M-) APART ACROSS THE WIDTH OF THE BLANKET. a. ALAN TT HE SO SURETS ACE. AL OR (NKSTSHORIZONTALLY SECUROSSELY THE FASTEN PE. ELANKET5INILL UNR LACING STAKE PRIATESIDE AGAINST THE SOIL SURFACE. ALL BLANKETS MOST BE SECURELY FASTENED TO SOIL SURFACE BY PLACING 6TAPLESf3TPXE6 D =diameter of standpipe equal to diameter Of Alpe. IN INSTPXES NOTE: SHOILLDDBE PLACED TTFIROUGH EACH FCOLORED DOTS CORRESPONDING TOT EAPPRO APPROPRIATE STAPLE PATTERN PI I)e NOTE, 4.THE EDGES OFPAFXLEL BLANKETS MUST BESTAPLED WITH APPROXIMATELY25'{S m12.6 m)OVERLAPDEPENDING a mayerlal mast Til Id P L 9 WHEN MORE THAN 1 d1&ANKET TYPE. TO ENSURE PROPER SEAM ALIGNMENT. PLACE THE EDGE Or THE OVERLNPPING&ANKET IBLANKET BEING STAND PIPE DETAIL BIORDLL/COMPOST LOG IS INSTALLED ON TOP) EVEN WITH THE COLORED SEAM STTTCH ON THE PREVIOUSLY INSTALLED BLANKET. S CONSECU1lVP 61ANKETS SPLICED DOWN THE$LCPE MUST REPLACFDENGOVER END ISHINGLS STYLET WITH ANAPPROwMATE NEEDED, OVERLAP ENDS A 3'{I.a)OVER AP. STAPLE THROUGH OVERLAPPEOAREA, APPROXIMATELYI2'(30v)APART ACROSS ENTIRE BLANKET WIDTH. MINIMUM OF 6' AND STAKE NOTE: N LOOSE SOIL DONDITICNS, THE USE OF STAPLE ORSTAKE LFNGTHS GREATERTHAN $' (15 )MAY BE NFCE$, A TP PROPERLY SECURE THE BLANKETS. Title` Temporary Sediment Title. Bio Log Staking rte Erosion Control Blanket Standard Plate Library Basin Standard Plate Library Straw Wood Bio Roll Standard Plate Library or Stapling Patterns & Installation City of Monticello Date: Plate No. City of Monticello Date: Plate No. City of Monticello Date: Plate No. 03-07 03-08 03-08 6007r 6009 6011 Revised:03-15 Revised:03-15 J Revised'03-15 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. MARK R WELCH DATE X/X/XX REG. N0. 42736 DATE: 6/3/2021 Prepared For: Baldur Real Estate, LLC 19356 MEADOW RIDGE TRAIL N MARINE ON ST. CROIX, MN 55047 FILE NO.: 20-408 LAYOUT 3 GP & CP 14070 Hwy 52 S.E. Chatfield, MN 55923 ENGINEERING SURVEYING PLANNING Ph. 50T867-1666 Fax 507-867-1665 www.ggg.to DESIGNED MRW DRAWN ADB CHECKED MRW REVISED RESUBMITTAL RESUBMITTAL RESUBMITTAL RESUBMITTAL FISHER — PUD BY DATE CITY OF MONTICELLO ADB 11/17/2021 ADB 12/6/2021 COUNTY ADB 6/8/2022 WIF"IGHT ADB 12/9/2022 BENCHMARK: 14 TOP NUT HYDRANT ON SCHOOL BOULEVARD 300' WEST OF ADB 2/14/2023 / / THE INTERSECTION WITH EDMONSON AVENUE NE, ELEV:965.13 ISI WI�I I� I�1 IICN�YII� STANDAlk'M PLATES SHEET 6 OF 6 SHEETS 33" FES 17-1 INV: 954.42 BASIN BOTTOM 953.0 Sumac Grove Oo oQOof►4 O° OaOD wQOdf4 d`O d PO A O 00Oq Od0 O \ Lawn Berm 50.00' /W Lawn @ Lawn @ Walk \ Sumac Grove I \. @ Lawn Walk p a rt m le n ts 100 units Parking \ 0 O O Entry /c O C Lawn Walk o / o � � Parking Lawn O Lawn Berm O Garage Entry o Lawn Lawn _ Walk O Lawn Lawn O Garage Entry Lawn �0 Lawn 0 Sumac Grove Oak Grove Oak Grove., SI Slope i T 77-—-- �- r _. Peao Petio Apa tments 11�1� DOME IIT GRAPHIC SCALE 50 0 25 50 100 ( IN FEET) 1IN= 50 FT I I I I I I I I Parking EDMONSON AVE NE 3 d O Engineering: G -Cubed Inc. 285 Westview Dr. West St. Paul, MN 55118 f 796-300-1213 Monticello Lake Apartments Daniel Tilsen, Lead Design Project Manager OakTree Design 651-283-7546 Site Planning and Landscape Design: djtilsen@gmail.com aalac m loaw oen of >~ anlno m lows wwn mlr a ws 1 @g Jeff Weber - Landscape Designer MNLA ASLA r Geoffrey G. Griffin, Surveyor 9665 Howard Lake Dr. NE. Forest Lake, MN 55025 507-867-1666, ex 102 651-260-6206 jgwl@comcast.net as roan aow aalm� Mouo wa geoffg@ggg.to andscape ann i n a—c wwa art s aruv.E alwav asoll mr i s « xow ou. w�- mn rA n ewr nlw Mark Welch, Engineer�:� I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared uaxnr trm wo asrm amort «wvrtm� Ip m.� wp 507-867-1666 ex 105 by me or under supervision and I am duly licensed Professionalmarkwra°�oa m° enwerexr q aw w wno Develop ggg.to City of Monticello - Wright County SHRUB DETAIL i m�xo nai�6w maswmaa wm ruaw wwuo mrwa Designed :Jeff Weber n .aet woolloar Kol rsoaau4 i atwo mg ow xo mlw m �.a — omaaoa Developer: Monticello Meadows Town Homes, LLC Drawn:JeffWeber wawr4wraErwawlwmalweaoera. K.Peter Salland, Esq. DECIDUOUS TREE DETAIL 19356 Meadowridge Trail N., Marine Mn. 55047Revised By Date BENCHMARK: Cell: 651-245-7222 TOP NUT HYDRANT ON SCHOOL BOULEVARD 300' WEST OF Office 651-433-0155 Revised Landscape Jeff Weber Feb. 2023 THE INTERSECTION WITH EDMONSON AVENUE NE, ELEV:965.13 Peterstalland@hotmail.com Walk O G 11■I. qr 1 l Parking I ® Walk I® Material List I Lawn O �. °Oleg°r°6► ��OgpO O° • � - d0°O� �i���4�o0�aOq � 00 0000 POs Garage Entry Lawn 0° Lawn Slope �'C04aa i APS AM Walk O Oak Grove /Sumac Grove Fence Sumac Grove Symbol Plant Name Latin Name Size Number o Red Maple (Native Boulvard Tree) Acer rubrum 'Autumn Radiance' 2 1/2" Dia. 35 White Oak (Oak Savanna Tree) Quercus Bicolor Fast native Oak Tree 2" Dia 21 (planted in naturalized groves) growing Acer saccharum 'Barret Cole' 2" Dia 27 ® Columnar Apollo Maple Hybrid Narrow form of Sugar Maple Norway Pine (Minnesota State Tree) Pinus resinosa 8' tall 39 Juniper (Evergreen Shrub of Oak Savanna) Juniperus Sabina 'Broadmoor' #5 250 0 Hydrangea Quickfire H dran ea paniculata'Bulk' #5 81 (. Alpine Currant (short screening hedge) Ribes alpinum #5 250 Grass Flame Grass Miscanthus sinensis'Purpurascens' #1 246 Grass Big Bluestem 'Red October' Andropogon 'Red October' Native Prairie #1240 Daylilly (Mixed Colors)Hemerocallis varieties #1 56 • Catmint'Walkers Low' Nepeta faassenii'Walker's Low' #1 40 Praire Seed Mix with Straw Blanket (8) varieties Native Grasses and (20) varieties of Forbs of Oak Savanna Short Dr9AShOrt Pralre Seed NR-, 13'1,11 Native Staghorn Sumac Clusters awrwoho"r`�S,zeXcn o:a.e$.a.r.uxaexn.......xwsw ameea.br Rhus typhina #2 200 �ib'.4 4mna.Rvc •Iws.vr[.uwoa.twwm.sue..an.osbi..mr.oev. oO Parking Lot Lighting Drainage System KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That Ocello, LLC a Minnesota limited liability company, owner of the following described property, situated in the County of Wright, State of Minnesota, to wit: OUTLOT C, MONTICELLO BUSINESS CENTER, according to the recorded plat thereof, on file and of record at the office of the County Recorder, Wright County, Minnesota. Has caused the some to be surveyed and platted as MONTICELLO BUSINESS CENTER EIGHTH ADDITION and does hereby dedicate to the public for public use the drainage and utility easements as shown on this plat. In witness whereof said Ocello, LLC a Minnesota limited Iiabilit comp�an"y�,� has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this Q day of QN�oer____- 204L. Si ned: Ocello, LLC ,_���--a-------- Shawn Weinand, Chief Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ,y, This ins was cknowledged before me this AAay of _ _ 202.1 by Shawn Weinand, Chief Manager of Ocello, LLC a (MiMinnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the company. �r Sig ture fid,{t e aeift 9tio me Notary Public, _ County, Minnesota My commission expires: Qi�Sr_D�d1_ SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE I Geoffrey G Griffin do hereby certify that this plat was prepared by me or under my direct supervision; that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor in the State of Minnesota; that this plat is a correct representation of the boundary survey; that all mathematical data and labels are correctly designated on this plat; that all monuments depicted on this plat have been, or will be correctly set within one year; that all water boundaries and wet lands, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.01, Subd. 3, as of the date of this certificate are shown and labeled on this plat; and all public ways are shown and labeled on this plat. Dated this -`/ day of —e Fx.�'3t 2021 Geoffrey G Griff�censed Land Surveyor Minnesota License No. 21940 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF _Q�'[Qd ___ tI The regoln Surveyor's Certificate was acknowledged before me this J1 day of 201, by Geoffrey G Griffin, Land Surveyor, Minnesota License No. 21940 Signature Notary Public, (&A County. Mi��1nggs,,oto My commission expires: -otp, SZ:I�__ CITY OF MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION Printed Name Be it known that at a meeting held on this —5t day of _NoVtvYlW—Y—_-__-, 2011, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, did hereby review and approve this plat TICELLO BUSINESS CENTER EIGHTH ADDITION. -------------- -------- Chairp son Secreta Uyu CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA This plat of MONTICELLO BUSINESS CENTER EIGHTH ADDITION was approved and accepted by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, at a regular meeting thereof held this 0t%day of LiiVYI �, 20-U, and said plat is in compliance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.03, Subd. 2. ——� — -C-e� V � V•VI'W`�— WRIGHT COUNTY SURVEYOR I hereby certify that in accordance withy,Minnesota Sttgs, Section 505.021, Subd. 11, this plat has been reviewed and approved this A&Iday of e g 20' L% Wright County Surveyor WRIGHT COUNTY LAND RECORDS Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.021, Subd. 9, taxes payable for the year 2012-2 on the land hereinbefore described have been paid. Also, pursu to Minne c,11 t tes, Section 72.12, there are no delinquent taxes and transfer entered this da of _____ 20a . Wri t County and Records Administrator WRIGHT COUNTY RECORDER I hereby certify that this instrument was filed in the office of the County Recorder for record on this 1-- day of S,Jt7_v_Q.Y -------- 20d}, at 3 -Op o'lcllocck ? .M. and was duly recorded in Cabinet No. _ Sleeve�tQl-, as Document No. __1 \_I D=114 Wright (C�unty Recorder MONTICELLO VICINITY MAP (NOT TO SCALE) 041c (CA Plat BUSINESS CENTER EIGHTH ADDITION I r I n, L_C L_I v Fu -F �t 1 2 1 L- -L F-1 L_ i SW 1/4 OF SEC. 14, TWP. 121N, RGE. 25W WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA LEGEND VAMPED IRON PIPE WITH PLASTIC CAP 0 STAMPED LS 21940 SET FOUND MONUMENTS ARE 1/2 INCH IRON PIPES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED O WRIGHT COUNTY MONUMENT D.E. DRAINAGE EASEMENT U.E. UTILITY EASEMENT EASEMENT LINE UNDERLYING PLAT LINE SECTION LINE - CENTERLINE F- C) I <i I NOTE n ,� _ ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION LINE EASEMENT PER DOCUMENT T' NO. 587953 TO BE VACATED. c � � r BEARINGS ( ` cC ALL BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE NORTH LINE OUTLOT C, MONTICELLO BUSINESS CENTER, WHICH IS ASSUMED Cj TO BEAR S89°14'00"W/N89"14'00"E. / �� ./ �J \� 2� DRAINAGE EASEMENT DEFINED AN UNOBSTRUCTED EASEMENT FOR THE OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF ALL WATERWAYS, BOTH SURFACE AND UNDERGROUND RUNNING OVER, UNDER AND ACROSS SAID EASEMENT. UTILITY EASEMENT DEFINED AN UNOBSTRUCTED EASEMENT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE OF ALL NECESSARY UNDERGROUND OR SURFACE PUBLIC UTILITIES INCLUDING THE RIGHT TO CONDUCT DRAINAGE AND TRIMMING ON SAID EASEMENT. .: vrTV VL LjV VL_L-VI I\v O / nl ITII AN �- / r v I v VIIN i\ivv _ 50 50 <I r-Inl r -n pnA^ 1C (\L_L-IN\I\IVI �'ti�' \ �•W1i,`/\I `l L_Lr\�'. 1L)� nr, r,l I/l t`1 1" I� T I I I " I\ L-) /� U U I I�I�\rI I N </ J L 21 GRAPHIC SCALE 100 0 50 100 200 ( SCALE IN FEET) 1 INCH= 100 FEET NW 1/4 NE 1/4 SITE z &ro SE 1/4 SW 1/4 SW 1/4 OF SEC. 14, TWP. 121N, RGE. 25W WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA LEGEND VAMPED IRON PIPE WITH PLASTIC CAP 0 STAMPED LS 21940 SET FOUND MONUMENTS ARE 1/2 INCH IRON PIPES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED O WRIGHT COUNTY MONUMENT D.E. DRAINAGE EASEMENT U.E. UTILITY EASEMENT EASEMENT LINE UNDERLYING PLAT LINE SECTION LINE - CENTERLINE F- C) I <i I NOTE n ,� _ ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION LINE EASEMENT PER DOCUMENT T' NO. 587953 TO BE VACATED. c � � r BEARINGS ( ` cC ALL BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE NORTH LINE OUTLOT C, MONTICELLO BUSINESS CENTER, WHICH IS ASSUMED Cj TO BEAR S89°14'00"W/N89"14'00"E. / �� ./ �J \� 2� DRAINAGE EASEMENT DEFINED AN UNOBSTRUCTED EASEMENT FOR THE OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF ALL WATERWAYS, BOTH SURFACE AND UNDERGROUND RUNNING OVER, UNDER AND ACROSS SAID EASEMENT. UTILITY EASEMENT DEFINED AN UNOBSTRUCTED EASEMENT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE OF ALL NECESSARY UNDERGROUND OR SURFACE PUBLIC UTILITIES INCLUDING THE RIGHT TO CONDUCT DRAINAGE AND TRIMMING ON SAID EASEMENT. .: vrTV VL LjV VL_L-VI I\v O / nl ITII AN �- / r v I v VIIN i\ivv _ 50 50 <I r-Inl r -n pnA^ 1C (\L_L-IN\I\IVI �'ti�' \ �•W1i,`/\I `l L_Lr\�'. 1L)� nr, r,l I/l t`1 1" I� T I I I " I\ L-) /� U U I I�I�\rI I N </ J L 21 GRAPHIC SCALE 100 0 50 100 200 ( SCALE IN FEET) 1 INCH= 100 FEET 0 0 WM I WM WM WM NLN WM YYA W. rrx vxa WM WM WM O1 V4N NLN WM �N� vimWM VVA YyM YUA rimr4W WM tn EDMONSON AVE NE Of EOMONSON AVE NE Of 4m l31 l31 X31 l31 l 31 X31+lal l31 11-n---7��731 l31 �3� IliHAO 1131 �HAO �HAO HAO ---------------------------------- ----------BERM— -- ---- --- --BERM---- N j am+ - - 13 UNIT GABA( NI G AX N� G 4 / / � �0 0 �> I100R ELkW;E ,76 FU ELEV:118 /�°/%���°moo I o U== 1 / ro / I ZZ 298> I i 1 Cz 03 I LEGEND WATER HYDRANT & GATE VALVE © SANITARY MANHOLE L m�/p u�I I \\// ®o STORM MANHOLE & CATCHBASIN ®4 SIGNS GAS VALVE ElCOMMUNICATIONS BOX ELECTRIC POLE O \ fix/ ° LIGHT POLE/WALL MOUNT UGHT / TREE 1 IN PI) j n a �n h� 81 \ \ \ \ / p — CONTOUR 0y 0. / / ,�T O – MINOR CONTOUR c WM WATERMAIN \e—SAN SANITARY SEWER STORM SEWER OVHE OVERHEAD ELECTRIC ONES 1 0 OJ ''7 \ UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINES UNDERGROUND COMMUNICATIONS LINE Q2jr li Oi jy �/�° / �� RAILING, CHAINLINK FENCE — GAS — GAS LINE / I Z Li- \ i �� d v, • ° �% WATER SERVICE I ] a a. y 8 w • \ \ y0v ° / �j`/O /�jx� ° / DRAIN TILE/ SUBDRAIN PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOUR / PROPOSED MINOR CONTOUR I //" a� p -------- EASEMENT LINE = BITUMINOUS SURFACING 1 \\ / �p p / •�.". CONCRETE SURFACING BUILDING Oi I WA LANDSCAPING PROPOSED BITUMINOUS SURFACING Oo ^ --------------------------------------- – -- ---------- – ---------L---------dr° o / PROPOSED CONCRETE SURFACING ° SILT FENCE (PER STD. PLATE 6006) GRADING LIMITS C O X 1,"0.00 EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION X 108 ELEVATION PROPOSED SLOPE 0 INLET BARRIER (PER STD. PLATE NKE & 5) EROSIOCO BLANKET PROPOSED PUBLIC GREENSPACE /PARKPROPOSED / p / AND AMENITIES TO BE DETERMIN / ° /� � / (PERM DOT 3885NCATT..J N)L > c PERK TD PTLATE 6002& 3)TRANCE PATHWAYS RIP RAP (PER STD. PLATE 4009) / ° / GRAPHIC SCALE G 20 40 80 OOOOOOOGOO RETAINING WALL BUFFERYARD LINE O (IN FEET ) 1IN=40FT AGGREGATE SURFACING TRANSITION I BOULDER OR BIG BLOCK ISHEREBY CERTIFY THAT DATE: 3/5/2021 Prepared For: P REVISED BY DATE CITY OF MONTICELLO MONTICELLO LAKE APARTMENTS SUBMITTAL ADB 9/20/2021 T WPUN, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ENGINEERING DESIGNED MRW RESUBMITTAL ADBPRELIMINARY AND THAT I AM A DULY UNDER ENGINEER UNDER THE UWS Q Ba dur Real Estate, LLC SURVEYING10/18/2021WRIGHT � - �u O C� 0 DRAWN ADB COUNTY PUD SITE PLAN RESUBMITTAL ADB 11/17/202 THE STATE OF THE STATE oP MINNESOTA. 19356 MEADOWRIDGE TRAIL N PLANNING MARK R WELCH 4273fi MARINE ON ST. CROIX, MN 55047 Ph. 507-567-1666 14070 H 52 S.E. Fax 507-867-1665 CHECKED MRWBENCHMARK: RESUBMITTAL ADB 12/8/2021SHEET 1 DATE REG. NO. FILE NO.: 20-408 LAYOUT 3 GP & CP Chatfield, MN 55923 `"""'''t° OF 1 SHEETS MAIN FLOOR APARTMENT PA1 LU Q 0 J J W U 1 z O M k%.. architecture + design group 0 O - - 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 2 A3.1 z w 75rr a Q w Y Q J Q J J W ' U H • z �O PARKING GARAGE PA2 architecture design group p I I I I I I I I I I I I II^I I I ISI I I 2 A3.1 z w 75rr a Q w Y Q J Q J J W ' U H • z �O PARKING GARAGE PA2 architecture design group p SECOND FLOOR APARTMENT PA3 LU Y Q J ■ M k%.. architecture + design group THIRD FLOOR APARTMENT LU Y Q J 0 J J W U H z O 75 ■ M k%.. architecture + design group I "' 1,400 SF OF STONE SHOWN(SEE DASHED BOXES) 8,866 SF OF ELEVATION THIS SURFACE NOTE RIDGE VARIES AT ENDS AND MIDDLE OF BUILDING VARIATION OF SOFFIT HEIGHT ALONG ALL ELEVATIONS J � - PARKLAND ELEVATION 1 1 " = 301-011 1,860 SF OF STONE SHOWN(SEE DASHED BOXES) 9,657 SF OF ELEVATION THIS SURFACE L --i-------------- J L - - -J-J 287'- 6" STREET ELEVATION 1 1 " = 30'-0" EXTERIOR FINISHES - TRUSS BEARING A 131'-33/4" _ THIRD LEVE 122' - 3 3/4" SECOND LEVEL 111' - 1 7/8" MAIN LEVEL 100'-0" PARKING GARAGE 89'-0" TRUSS BEARING A 131'-33/4" _ THIRD LEVEL � 122' - 3 3/4" 1 SECOND LEVEL 111' - 1 7/8" MAIN LEVEL � 100'0 PARKING GARAGE 89'- 0.' �! ROOF GAF TIMBERLINE COLOR TO BE SELECTED FASCIA AND SOFFIT EDCO PREFINISHED METAL SIDING EDCO BOARD AND BATTEN IN PREFINISHED METAL WINDOW FIBERGLASS OR VYNIL WITH ENERGY STAR RATING ADD ALLOWANCE FOR: BAND TRIM AROUND WINDOWS THIN BRICK OR STONE FACE ACCENT APARTMENT BUILDING ELEVATIONS PA5 w Y Q J 0 J J W U A architecture + design group 1,579 SF OF STONE SHOWN(SEE DASHED BOXES) NOTE RIDGE VARIES AT ENDS AND MIDDLE OF BUILDING 11,456 SF OF ELEVATION THIS SURFACE VARIATION OF SOFFIT HEIGHT ALONG ALL ELEVATIONS n STREET ELEVATION 2 ' 1 " = 30'-0" 1,325 SF OF STONE SHOWN(SEE DASHED BOXES) 11.345 SF OF ELEVATION THIS SURFACE i _ THIRD LEVEL 122' - 3 3/4" SECOND LEVEL 111' - 1 7/8" MAIN LEVEL 100'-0" PARKING GARAGE 89'-0" THIRD LEVEL 1 122'-33/4" 1 SECOND LEVEL 1 111' - 1 7/8" AMAIN LEVEL 100' - 0" JPARKING GARAGE 1 89' - 0" I A ■ APARTMENT BUILDING ELEVATIONS PA6 architecture design group p 0 LO M 0 D C OFFI 31' - 11" L-1 �;MARKETI MODEL CONF 77' - 9" L RESIDENC OFFICE SPACE OFFICE F= _T=� ❑ ENTR LOBBY 27 x 26 ,1 -T -T-11 STORAGE GARBAGE RECYCLIN FITNESS 22X15 MOVIE 15 x 17 ,�71, �n n uLED u I ARTH ROOM L ---J 'x26 YOGA 15X13 AN. W04 t®® \-- .11 66'-6° 1 a� \EO PARTY 23x17 CLUBHOUSE PLAN M k%&A PA7architecture + design group n ENTRY OF CLUBHOUSE 1/16" = 1'-0" n SIDE ELEVATION OF CLUBHOUSE 1/16" = V-0" LEVEL &:) 00' - 0" PATIO ELEVATION OF CLUBHOUSE 1/16" = 1'-0" SIDE ENTRY ELEVATION OF CLUBHOUSE 1/16" = V-0" CLUBHOUSE ELEVATIONS LEVEL 100'-0" • w Y Q J 0 M k%&A architecture + design group .k t .$ 'Q. 33" FES 17-1 N Lawn INV: 954.42 BASIN BOTTOM 953.0 A partments 100 units 1 Qa^.o 0 .f Entry 0 Z ag ....................... ........... ....................... ....................... ..................... ................. . . ...... ...... ....................... ........................ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Garage Entry \ \ Walk �\ O r. Lawn 50.00'/W Engineering: G -Cubed Inc. 285 Westview Dr. West St. Paul, MN 55118 796-300-1213 Daniel Tilsen, Lead Design Project Manager 651-283-7546 djtilsen@gmail.com Geoffrey G. Griffin, Surveyor 507-867-1666, ex 102 geoffg@ggg.to Mark Welch, Engineer 507-867-1666 ex 105 markw@ggg.to Developer: Monticello Meadows Town Homes, LLC K.Peter Salland, Esq. 19356 Meadowridge Trail N., Marine Mn. 55047 Cell: 651-245-7222 Office 651-433-0155 Peterstalland@hotmail.com L IM a'�1%4�° d� --6►4:�9...��4�%�✓/J'��'�e�'.. � a►r_ ��.!�tr I 1►�..�%.+?r:a1R_n° �_QI�e�°.�G1s. �i?d� �o ���/ b�bJi1 aisisi"y"wr��i...R��.����ld���� e t : °ilt��o ��� �I���. �' �R•?r � �a � �,� 6p o��a /� ,p/ +i►11d9+.��"'IEi7i4 j`�7 r% �T'fpr � a I ►.tea ��/�VVAt- g���a'�'_!�lA6"A O 41 _� _�::iL'.ilc :w�:v.:..Y � :` "a:.h:n.:r� . +:P:a:w�v,:v.:a +��►��a rr• a"�w:P' "` "�` �av�:+tk:�:ar�:v�:�'.�:�:�*�ir•.�:�' � �w:�*.'IM��v� wlr► w.N.r �.:.il► il: �► i�::i �,S` btl� Walk 0 Lawn Walk Lawn Entry 0-) \-t @ )y I KNR Lawn MINIS Lawn Garage Entry Lawn O 8 Unit Garage *8 Unit GarageT-1 WM- ✓s�.. :.�.. - �p7r fO �: So- �'{'u_ � - ✓u k ��` '� �� 11'�%r rw• _ �1./.J:--�%1".�:�� ��t I I I I �,•. �, . - r Walk Lawn f @ OakTree Design Site Planning and Landscape Design: Jeff Weber - Landscape Designer MNLA ASLA 9665 Howard Lake Dr. NE. Forest Lake, MN 55025 651-260-6206 jgwl@comcast.net I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under supervision and I am duly licensed Professional Designed : Jeff Weber Drawn: Jeff Weber Revised By Date New Landscape Jeff Weber 1l1 Oct 21 Revised Landscape Jeff Weber 1 Dec 21 07 L @ Lawn GRAPHIC SCALE 50 0 25 50 100 ( IN FEET) IIN= 50 FT Monticello Lake Apartments Preliminary Landscape Planning City of Monticello -Wright County BENCHMARK: TOP NUT HYDRANT ON SCHOOL BOULEVARD 300' WEST OF THE INTERSECTION WITH EDMONSON AVENUE NE, ELEV:965.13 0 Walk ;w N P• w oo ul w m m m XXX NONE 00, 111 111 111 M. II�IC��_ �� ti�� =111 li�l= ,` • �� � � � 4�'4�'e� ■I� .L .... 1 1. ], ,y. .. . ,]...� ♦. 2,.. l ]. .. L.. ] lh,1�_ A ®O r� �a ra �a • 7Office and Events 111 111 ' � � •� �' � ��� �•� 1' O 0 111 111 111 111 111 ` 8 Unit Garage Parking 8 Unit Garage EDMONSON AVE NE mr a mor aru � Gw� � naac m Ew.. oa• art !WL E Lfl6 .nl.Fa EML16 oa nom ae•c wra, r tx arrc mw � surra Ex o� a nwr r camua• ram monm xaEFmo tww swoat Enure a r r /r nuE •uar •nose ak'ww.c1pP�x..s urt . E11b2 eusr nar aorm. arra a a�to�tt��.r�t ew wuM01ec awau •at E Eltlm a IrwID u•E su lIOMLY TMFID tt• MIE M/flaelF b FI/M E,rra Ea ,wa not m wcoaxr rrx�ir °moi ncmwrr SHRUB DETAIL O 11 ESB A IYEI IIIIR EY 6A •re Emo araw •x .... wE Emr x•E tE: WW1.9L�11�OFAl W M 961W EE FE•r E as v�.r�t�ta ooa.uwnwn•.n ton. � o tE EI®1E wE tFlal tErat EYYLE WI R.W W M M Y91BlL Y. DECIDUOUS TREE DETAIL Walk O Lawn ME Material List Symbol Plant Name Latin Name Size Number Red Maple (Native Boulvard Tree) Acer rubrum 'Autumn Radiance' 2 1/2" Dia. 35 White Oak (Oak Savanna Tree) Quercus Bicolor 2" Dia 32 (planted in naturalized groves) Fast growing native Oak Tree ® Acer saccharum 'Barret Cole' 2" Dia 27 Columnar Apollo Maple Hybrid Narrow form of Sugar Maple Norway Pine (Minnesota State Tree) Pinus resinosa 8' tall 32 0 Juniper (Evergreen Shrub of Oak Savanna) Juniperus Sabina 'Broadmoor' #5 250 ® H dran ea Quickfire Hydrangea aniculata'Bulk' #5 81 Alpine Currant (short screening hedge) Ribes alpinum #5 250 Grass Flame Grass Miscanthus sinensis'Purpurascens' #1 246 I ' Grass Big Bluesterl October' Andropogon'Red October' Native Prairie #1 240 Daylilly (Mixed Colors) Hemerocallis varieties #1 56 • Catmint'Walkers Low' Nepeta faassenii'Walker's Low' #1 40 Praire Seed Mix with Straw Blanket (8) varieties Native Grasses and (20) varieties of Forbs of Oak Savanna 6hort Dry/Short Prs;re Seal Mix 2-3'tA Pas��am aeE%xFvnMDF�eey� Native Staghorn Sumac Clusters Rhus typhina #2 300 Nesse Fo Aes.N Flmvrs m.snem.Usb �r�e� rsa�raasn�rc.aa.m, ancw�r.m;a..,.o...osncr,.,o.,osaw ® Parking Lot Llghting Drainage System Sheet 12 2 0 U 0 Z W M U) 0 00 0 CO 0 0 a LO z v; J 0 a a W Z Z 0 CO W F- D W D Z U-1 a a Z W X 0 wsb March 2, 2023 Matt Leonard City Engineer/Public Works Director City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1 Monticello, MN 55362 Re: Monticello Lake Apartments Final Plat, PUD, & Plan Review City Project No. 2021-037 WSB Project No. R-017894-000 Dear Mr. Leonard: We have reviewed the Monticello Lake Apartments final plat, construction plans, as well as grading and erosion control plans dated February 14, 2023. The applicant proposes to construct two separate 100 -unit apartment buildings on a site with approximately 10.8 acres. The engineering plans and documents were reviewed for general conformance with the City of Monticello's general engineering and stormwater treatment standards. We offer the following comments regarding these matters. General & Final Plat The City has prepared a Small Area Plan for the Pointes at Cedar (formerly Chelsea Commons) area improvements that includes a large stormwater ponding area, a network of trails/access, and other improvements adjacent to or within the applicant's property. See additional comments from City staff pertaining to what the expectations are for the applicant relating to these improvements. Grading of the proposed site will need to provide more detail meeting the intent of the City's vision and small area plan including continued undulation on the southwest and west boundaries. If the City proceeds with the Pointes at Cedar area improvements, grading and other improvements may need to occur within the applicant's property to achieve the City's vision. Provide permanent and/or temporary easements for this proposed work. In - progress, final requests/requirements will be provided by City staff under separate cover. 2. Grading of the site is proposed within the Great River Energy powerline easement. Provide confirmation from the power company that they have approved the proposed grading and other improvements within the easement. Complete, encroachment letter was received by the City. 3. There are improvements proposed to be constructed on the adjacent property to the west. Provide easement documents or a written agreement with the adjacent property owner. 4. Additional comments were provided directly on the plan sheets. Not all comments on the plan sheets have been summarized in this letter. K:\017894-000\Admin\Docs\2023-02-25 Submittal (Final Construction Plans)\_2023-03-02 LTR Monticello Lakes Apt - WSB Plan Review.docx Monticello Lake Apartments — WSB Engineering Plan Review March 2, 2023 Page 2 5. The City will require that the overhead powerlines along Edmonson Avenue are lowered and placed underground adjacent to the project area. 6. With Final Plat submittals include the following: a. Show and note drainage and utility easements on the final plat document. In - progress, updated easements on the plat to be drainage and utility easements. Verify easements are not needed for private sanitary or water. b. An existing conditions/demolition plan that includes the impacts related to the proposed utility connections in Edmonson Avenue and School Boulevard. Label existing utilities pipe sizes and material types and include hatching/notes for removals of all existing improvements (structures, curb, bituminous, concrete aprons, fences, etc.) proposed to be impacted with the project. C. iii iu rr.. �.ny —11 iu.... - UUL-.. rJiou.... Joici , moi iitary sewer, and storm sewer, etc. Provide typical section/detail for stormwater improvements, infiltration basin, and control structures. Include typical street/parking lot pavement section(s). Complete. d. Erosion/sediment control plans and SWPPP shee Complete. 7. Streetlights along Edmonson shall match the City light style. 8. It is difficult to read text shown within the building areas, reduce/eliminate the interior detail to provide more clarity on both the utility and grading plans. 9. The plans show the final grading design of the Pointes at Cedar pond, but do not consider what the interim condition might be until the City's improvements are complete. Provide a plan(s) showing what the interim condition will be for the proposed outlet and ponding area, meeting the required stormwater treatment standards for the site. Site Plan (Grading Set — Sheets 1) 10. Streets and utilities shall be designed in accordance with the applicable City Subdivision Ordinances and the City's General Specifications and Standard Details Plates for Street and Utility Construction Complete, acknowledged by applicant. 11. The applicant has shown a network of pedestrian path connections on tr^ Extend the trail along Edmonson Avenue south to School Boulevard There is an existing pedestrian path located on the north side of Farmstead Drive east of Edmonson Avenue; a connection to Edmondson Avenue on the north side of the site access should be provided. In progress, show existing (approximate) trail locations on the east side of Edmonson. Show and label all adjacent existing trails more clearly. 12. It is not clear on the plan whether concrete curb and gutter is proposed around the perimeter of the parking lot, access drives, and other areas. Provide more detail and notes on future plan submittals. Provide additional detail for ribbon curb proposed throughout the site. Identify when ribbon curb is tip in versus tip out. 13. The Pointes at Cedar (formerly Chelsea Commons) area improvement project proposed by the City includes the widening and reconstruction of Edmonson Avenue to include a center left turn lane. The applicant is proposing to widen Edmonson Avenue, confirm this meets the geometric requirements of this improvement Complete, applicant indicated in Monticello Lake Apartments — WSB Engineering Plan Review March 2, 2023 Page 3 response that all improvements to Edmonson Avenue are per the standards provided to us in an email dated March 18th, 2021 from the project engineer, Ryan Melhouse. 14. A 10 foot wide trail will be required along Edmonson, this is being reviewed with the Pointes at Cedar project and overall City vision. Path is currently not shown as 10' wide. 15. In general, clean up the site plan and legend on Sheet 1 of the Grading Plan set. It would be preferred to have a separate site plan that does not contain all the contour ;r`,.., 1. - ' .. ' -1 not all pavement types are correct and there is not distinction between trail and interior site bituminous pavements, the existing pavement is hatched on Edmonson and is the same hatch type as the proposed. 16. Confirm whether the fencing along the north edge of the property will be temporary or permanent. Utility Plans (Utility Set - Sheets 3 - 7) 17. Streets and utilities shall be designed in accordance with the applicable City Subdivision Ordinances and the City's General Specifications and Standard Details Plates for Street and Utility Construction Complete, City details included. 18. With final construction plans, provide confirmation of MDH (watermain) and MPCA (sanitary sewer) plan review and permitting. In -progress, the applicant indicated they have submitted for these permits and awaiting approval. 19. With final plat submittals add the following notes. Complete. a. The City will not be responsible for any additional costs incurred that is associated with variations in the utility as -built elevations. These elevations shall be verified in the field prior to construction. b. The plans shall comply with the requirements in the City General Specifications on the Cover Sheet. c. The City specifications require that sanitary sewer and storm sewer require televising. Video files shall be provided to the City for review. 20. The City's building department will review required fire hydrant location(s) and emergency vehicle access/circulation. Fire truck circulation will need to accommodate the City's ladder truck, provide an exhibit showing turning movements. No turning movements appear to be shown on the plan. a. There does not appear to be sufficient coverage with the proposed hydrant locations. An additional hydrant might be beneficial for the southern building. b. Hydrants should be located or watermain installed such that the hydrants are located at the system high -points to allow for proper air discharge/maintenance. 21. Watermain looping will be required through the site to provide adequate fire flow supply. Additional utility stubs to adjacent properties may also be required to accommodate future looping connections. The applicant has provided preliminary watermain and sanitary sewer plans showing a connection to the existing systems on School Boulevard to the south, Edmonson Boulevard to the east, and an extension north to the northerly property line. The applicant does not need to extend water or sewer main to the northerly property line; the northerly extension from the looping connection at the main driveway entrance can be utilized for building services and/or hydrants. Initial alignments acceptable, a final review will be conducted with future updates. Monticello Lake Apartments — WSB Engineering Plan Review March 2, 2023 Page 4 22. Sanitary public between MH 4 and MH 5 is currently labeled as private. If it is public confirm with adjacent property owner for sanitary stub location. Now labeled as public — no additional sanitary service stub provided. Label proposed service stub for adjacent property owner. 23. There appears to be a proposed storm sewer connecting the existing pond to the south of the site, but this is unclear whether this will be constructed with the project. Clarify on the plans. 24. With final plat submittal, provide the following: d. Provide an overall utility plan sheet. Not provided. e. Compieie water, sanitary sewer, storm sewer profiles. In -progress, a detailed review will be conducted with future submittals. Complete. f. Include crossing locations of utilities in profiles. Complete. g. Add notes at each pertinent crossing to the effect of "Maintain 18" Separation, ire+.,ii A" D;—„4 ire i + r„ o, -,..A,4„ ;r ;—,,,—,a,a;+;„r„i i + Complete. h. Provide water and sanitary sewer service locations to each lot along with standard elevation information. Provide service length, size, material type with grade/class, grade, etc. in plan view. j. Private utility conduit crossings shall be shown for the joint trench. This will be coordinated with the City and private utility companies prior to construction commencing. Not called out on plan. k. If dewatering is anticipated, provide a dewatering plan. No dewatering plan submitted. I. Note the material grade of the water and sanitary sewer pipe (CL52, SDR 35, SDR 26, etc). Provided for sanitary main. Provide for watermain, water services and sanitary sewer services. m. Watermain Bury Depth shall be 7.5' minimum, revise profiles and note correct dimension. Not updated, 7.0' minimum depth still shown. Complete. n. All public storm pipe shall use RCP. Storm sewer between CB ED1 and CB 3 - - --'- - `-,m Edmonson Avenue is public and shown as 15" HDPE (Sheet 8). Complete. o. Update utility elevations to match grading plan. I Sections & Construction Details (Utility Set — Sheets 2. 12. 1 25. Provide geotechnical report and pavement recommendations to confirm section proposed terior parkir and drive aisleF Complete, geotechnical report provided with drainage report with matching pavement section recommendations. 26. The typical street section for the portion of Edmonson Avenue will need to meet current City design standards. The detail should also show the saw -cutting of the existing pavement edge. 27. Flared end into lake will need sheet pile as shown on detail plate 4008. Detail plat( included but a reference is needed in the plan and/or profile view of sheet 1' Complete. Monticello Lake Apartments — WSB Engineering Plan Review March 2, 2023 Page 5 Grading Plans (Grading Set — Sheets 1 — 3) 28. Label elevations on proposed contours. 29. 1viaximum slope graae or 4:-1 is allowed per City Design Guidelines. Current plans are showing 6:1 or steeper, but not all slope areas are labeled. Revise grading to meet the 4:1 slope requirement where applicable or provide additional information on site constraints and proposed stabilization measures. In progress, contours near underground parking entrances are currently shown steeper than 3:1, label proposed berm slopes and areas behind the proposed garage to the north. Complete. 30. Provide more slope arrows/percent grades for grading along public boulevard areas to verify that there is a minimum of 4% grade from the righ* to back of curb. Vegetated swales shall have a minimum grade of 2.01i Complete. 31. Provide more arrows and grade percentages over the paved surfaces including the driveways down to the underground parking areas. This information has been provided, but some of the drive isle slopes are 12%, maximum grade for drive -isles should be 10%. 32. Show all storm sewer maintenance access routes for structures outside of public right of way, add a note saying that "maintenance access shall be a minimum of 12 -feet wide with 10% max side slopes" to the grading plan. 33. Provide profile grades/arrows for the trails to confirm they meet typical ADA standards. 34. Additional grading plan comments: a. The grading of the parking areas surrounding the pool and pool house location is being directed towards these buildings/structures. Accommodations to achieve positive drainage away from the building and conveying this to the treatment pond will be needed. , proposed elevations at building corners, and elevations at corners of pool. Provide EOF of CB 4 and compare to LOE of Community Building to ensure adequate freeboard. b. Review Grading near the entrance of the development. There appears to be a low area in the curb near MH 3 where water will pond. c. Some of the grading is shown offsite, provide confirmation that adjacent property owners have given permission. d. Label more contours on the grading plan inset sheets. e. It is difficult to read the LFE/FFE labels on the buildings. Reduce/eliminate the detail of the interior elements of the buildings on both the utility and grading plans. Erosion Control & SWPPP (Grading Set — Sheets 4 — 7) 35. An NPDES/SDS Construction Storm Water General Permit (CSWGP) shall be provided with the grading permit or with the building permit application for review, prior to construction commencing. In -progress, acknowledged by applicant. 36. A niure UeLailed review of erosion/sediment control plans will be conducted with future submittals (final plat). Provide a SWPPP meeting the requirements on the Minnesota Construction Storm Water General Permit. a. Include a SWPPP within the construction plans meeting all requirements of the stormwater permit. Monticello Lake Apartments — WSB Engineering Plan Review March 2, 2023 Page 6 b. Silt fence appears the same line -weight as the contouring and is difficult to see. Use a darker/thicker line -type to distinguish between the two. c. Final review of erosion control and SWPPP will be completed once all material is provided Storm Sewer & Stormwater Management 37. Because of the adjacent Pointes at Cedar (formerly Chelsea Commons) Pond project this project will only be required to meet 50% of water quality credit and abstraction volume onsite. The pointes pond will provide 100% of the water quality, abstraction, and volume control for this site. Complete. d. Remove infiltration basins from the proposed plan. Infiltration will not be required for this site. Instead provide pre-treatment in the form of filter strips and swales prior to discharging into the storm sewer. i. Revise grading of green space to provide a shallow depression to collect stormwater from the existing proposed low points. Outlets should be set at the bottom grade elevation. e. The rest of the water quality will be met within the Pointes pond. During the interim conditions a temporary infiltration will need to be provided onsite to treat the excess storm water until the Pontes pond is completed. For the permanent condition, consider a bypass piping system so that all excess stormwater can be routed to the future Pointes Pond and only the absolute minimum meeting the City's treatment requirements is treated onsite Complete. Include updated stormwater narrative and modeling information. Complete. 38. Label and include filter strips on plan where applicable; provide typical section/details. 39. Include abstraction volume onsite for future widening of Edmonson Road and turn lane improvements. Additional impervious area shall be accounted for with this project. Update impervious surface calculation to include all proposed impervious surfaces related to this project. In -progress, include catch basins to capture additional impervious areas along Edmonson south of the proposed driveway. Complete. 40. The minimum FFE for this site is 959.5 based on the Pointes stormwater management analysis. This includes meeting the required freeboard. Please provide final FFE elevations in relation to the adjacent Pointes Pond. Complete. 41. Provide modeling information for each individual infiltration bmp with drainage areas to each. Provide boundaries and drainage areas on plan to show drainage. Show time of draw down for each basin. Complete. 42. Pretreatment, in the form of ponds, forebays, filter strips, or other approved methods, shall be provided for all infiltration areas. Pretreatment upstream of volume management practices is a key element in the long-term viability of infiltration areas per city design guideline- Complete. 43. At least two feet of vertical separation is required from an area's emergency overflow elevation to the lowest opening of a building. In areas where this separation is not or cannot be provided, additional analysis is required showing that the 100 -year back-to- back storm event does not affect adjacent homes. Complete. Monticello Lake Apartments — WSB Engineering Plan Review March 2, 2023 Page 7 44. Per city design guidelines Two feet of free board is required to adjacent buildings, provide additional information to include adjacent low openings. Complete. 45. Show maintenance routes and access to all stormwater BMP's. Complete. 46. Provide HWL elevations for all stormwater BMP's. Include EOF's and HWL for all low areas. Provide 2' of freeboard from EOF to low opening of adjacent structures. Complete. 47. Show EOF's for all low points in the development inside and outside of the roadway. Provide directional flow arrows and show contours on grading plan for all low points. Complete. 48. Explain interim conditions for stormwater management until large regional pond is created with Pointes at Cedar (formerly Chelsea Commons). Modeling should be provided showing all conditions, including interim to show how run off will be handled during all stages of the project. Complete. f. Provide an outlet to the future Points Pond, temporary grading will need to be completed for interim conditions until the pond is completed. g. Soil borings will be provided showing soils and infiltration rates for interim conditions. Infiltration basin will be removed with future development 49. One catch basin on Edmonson road is being provided, look into other locations to extend the storm sewer to catch and direct as much water as possible into the future Pointes at Cedar (formerly Chelsea Commons) regional pond. There are south of the driveway is an additional location a catch basin should be explored to try and capture more runoff. Complete. There is a note on the plan stating the work will be completed by others for Edmonson Avenue. Provide clarification as to what the plan is for the widening of Edmonson and what the interim conditions will be for drainage. Complete. 50. Look at alternatives to ribbon curb to ensure that water is directed to the storm sewer and available for collection in the Pointes Pond. Complete. 51. Provide a trunk storm sewer from Edmonson to the regional basin. Remove proposed infiltration basins and connect directly to the storm sewer. Complete. h. Add a catch basin upstream of proposed Basin O -S. i. See attach plans with comments. 52. Provide actual HydroCAD model in future submittals so we can verify all modeling information was entered correctly. Complete. 53. Include detailed profiles on the grading plan of each infiltration area. Complete. 54. Provide information on all storm sewer structures and pipes. Narrative references pipe sizing information. Please provide calcs Complete. 55. Provide additional information on storm sewer and how drainage will be reaching the two infiltration basins. Currently grades show slop away from the North basin towards the building. Provide clear information on how the basins will be receiving water, pre- treatment, and information on outlet structures. Complete. Monticello Lake Apartments — WSB Engineering Plan Review March 2, 2023 Page 8 56. The development will need to maintain existing flow rates for the 2 -year, 10 -year, and 100 -yr rainfall events. Provide calculations for rate control for each drainage area leaving the site, including interim conditions before all storage offsite has been built. Update stormwater narrative to include increased rates to the pond. Increase in rates are allowed to the stormwater bmp as it will meet all requirements. 57. Refer to the City design guidelines for storm sewer requirements on sizing, slope, and maximum spacing. Complete. 58. The new site will need to provide onsite volume control for runoff of 1.1" over the new impervious area, Pre-treatment measures are required prior to discharging to the volume control BMPs. If the volume ce ' ' . lirement is met, the water quality control standard shall be considered satisfied Complete. 59. An operation and maintenance plan for all stormwater BMPs is required and should be submitted with the stormwater management report for review. 60. Add a storm manhole with a grit chamber, hydrodynamic separator, or SAFL baffle upstream of the discharge to the pond. j. MH S-4 should have a sump minimum of 4' in depth along with one of the above mentioned bmp's to remove as much sediment as possible before discharging to the regional basin k. Proposed swale can be replaced with additional pre-treatment from the development 61. Consider adding native seeding in low area around MH S-2 instead of turf grass to assist with filter parking lot runoff. 62. The trench drains appear to have large aeras draining to them, consider minimizing drainage areas to these locations to reduce potential for plugged drains and bypass of runoff. 63. Combine the proposed stormwater outfalls to the future Pointes at Cedar pond into one for the site. Traffic & Access 64. Based on the proposed site plan the anticipated traffic generation would be 1088 vehicle per day(vpd), 72 AM peak hour trips and 88 PM peak hour trips, assuming 200 apartment units on the site. The traffic generation would increase from the original townhor-- proposal by 356 daily trips, 26 AM peak hour trips and 32 PM peak hour trips. Complete. 65. The proposed access to the site is located on Edmonson Avenue at Farmstead Drive, approximately 900 ft north of School Boulevard. The existing width of Farmstead Drive is 38 ft. The plan shows a 24 ft width on the proposed Site access road approaching Edmondson Avenue. The width of the access road should be widened from Edmonson Avenue to the first circulation driveway, to match the existing Farmstead Avenue width. Complete. 66. Currently there are no turn lanes provided on Edmonson Avenue at the Farmstead Drive/Site access driveway. As part of the Pointes at Cedar (formerly Chelsea Commons) area improvement project a Traffic Study was completed with a recommendation to include a center left turn lane along Edmonson Avenue between Chelsea Road and Monticello Lake Apartments — WSB Engineering Plan Review March 2, 2023 Page 9 School Boulevard. The applicant proposes to widen Edmonson Avenue adjacent to the site to accommodate the future improvements, but it is not clear who will be performing the work. There is a note on the plan stating the work will be completed by others. Provide clarification as to what the plan is for the widening of Edmonson and what the interim conditions will be for drainage. With the additional trips generated by the proposed apartment project and as surrounding development increases in the future, a southbound right turn lane into the site driveway may need to be considered. It appears there is already a 50' section of half right of way for the westerly portion of Edmonson corridor which would accommodate a future turn lane, if needed. Complete. 67. A sight line analysis should be completed at the proposed site access/driveway. Provide a detail/exhibit with considerations for landscaping, monument sign(s) or other features that could limit sight distances. Wetland & Environmental 68. The site is within the DWSMA and is subject to the requirements of the City's Wellhead Protection Plan. 69. The air photos show a wetland signature just north of School Boulevard and one to the west of the project. This likely is a stormwater pond built when the road was built. However, the applicant should submit a Level 1 Desktop Delineation or other wetland review to provide documentation about the natural or incidental status of wetlands within the project area and extents of the full existing lot area Complete, we concur with the applicant that there are no wetlands on the site. Please have the applicant provide a written response addressing the comments above. Feel free to contact me at 612-419-1549 if you have any questions or comments regarding the engineering review. Sincerely, WSB �;� L James L. Stremel, P.E. Senior Project Manager CITY OF Monticello FIRE DEPARTME I November 5, 2021 Teresa Thoreson McCormack CRW Architecture + Design Group 211 lith AVE. NW Rochester, MN 55901 Re: Monticello Lakes Development City Planning File 2021-037 Dear Mrs. McCormack: PHONE: 763-295-4111 103 Chelsea Road, Monticello, MN 55362 www.ci.monticello.mn.us/montifire After review of the most recent land use application plans dated 10/18/2021 for the proposed development in the City of Monticello. We have determined the following based on the 2020 MN State Fire Code: 1. 503.1.2 allows the fire code official to require more access than Chapter 5 requires based on terrain/topography. Given the proposed site and area grading, there is not enough space on the two westerly sides of the building for construction of the preferred aerial access roads. The City will therefore require a 10 -foot -wide flat surface around the two westerly -facing sides of the two buildings. This would allow for placement of ground ladders if needed. The allowance is made under 503.1.1.1 Item 3. The applicant will verify that all access drive spacing in the front parking lots are at least 24ft wide for aerial apparatus access and circulation within these two lots. The allowed decrease is from the required 26 feet width specified in D105.2 3. The applicant will verify and provide full turning radius in the two front parking lots for the City's aerial apparatus as required in D103.3. Turning radius for the aerial apparatus is enclosed. 10 Due to concerns about the significantly limited access to the westerly facing two sides of . - -- -r - C..11 nirnn 9 �) F..,. ... r.,.r„r+o.,-, +hrni inkni It tLAT 1 C Et . ACI Montii�c�effo mmoom FIRE DEPARTMENT PHONE: 763-295-4111 103 Chelsea Road, Monticello, MN 55362 www.ci.monticello.mn.us/montifire 5. building is required (not a 13R fire suppression system). This is required under Section 503.1.2. 6. Due to rescue concerns with limited access on the westerly two sides of the building, we are requesting an HVAC system capable of removing smoke from all common hallways upon activation of the fire alarm system. We are requiring this under 503.1.1.1 number 3 and 503.1.2 7. Finally, we are requiring hydrant spacing at 400 feet based on 507.5.1 number 2. As a reminder, we want to emphasize these requirements only apply to the 200 units on the current plan. If at any time the unit count exceeds 200 units these items are subject to further review and a new discussion for requirements will need to occur. If you have any questions on this matter, please do not hesitate to reach out to Fire Marshal Dan Klein at 763-271-7463. Sincerely, A Mike Mossey Monticello Fire Chief Encl Dan Klein Fire Marshal c: Rachel Leonard, City Administrator Angela Schumann, Community Development Director Mark Welch, G -Cubed Engineering, Surveying and Planning —WrICet. MN State Fire Code 2020 503.1.2 Additional access. The fire code official is authorized to require more than one fire apparatus access road based on the potential for impairment of a single road by vehicle congestion, condition of terrain, climatic conditions or other factors that could limit access. 503.1.1.1 Increases allowed. The 150 -foot distance shall be permitted to be increased for the following: 1. When the building is equipped throughout with an approved automatic sprinkler system installed in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1, 903.3.1.2, or 903.3.1.3. 2. For Group R occupancies equipped throughout with an approved automatic sprinkler system installed in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1, 903.3.1.2, or 903.3.1.3, the fire apparatus access Road shall extend to within 600 feet (183 m). 3. Where fire apparatus access roads cannot be installed because of location on property, topography, waterways, nonnegotiable grades, or other similar conditions, and an approved alternative means of fire protection is provided, the fire apparatus access road shall extend to within 300 feet (91.4 m). 507.5.1 Where required. Where a portion of the facility or building hereafter constructed or moved into or within the jurisdiction is more than 300 feet (91.5 m) from a hydrant on a fire apparatus access road, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building, on-site fire hydrants and mains shall be provided where required by the fire code official. Exceptions: 1. For Group R-3 and Group U occupancies, the distance requirement shall be 400 feet (122 m). 2. For buildings equipped throughout with an approved automatic sprinkler system installed in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1 or 903.3.1.2, the threshold for requiring on site fire hydrants and mains shall be increased to 400 feet (122 m). 3. For Group R-3 buildings equipped throughout with an automatic sprinkler system installed in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1, 903.3.1.2, or 903.3.1.3, the threshold for requiring on-site fire Hydrants and mains shall be increased to 600 feet (183 m). D105.2 Width. Aerial fire apparatus access roads shall have a minimum unobstructed width of 26 feet (7925 mm), exclusive of shoulders, in the immediate vicinity of the building or portion thereof. D103.3 Turning radius. The minimum turning radius shall be determined by the fire code official. Planning Commission Agenda — 03/07/2023 2C. Public Hearing - Consideration of an Amendment to the Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan (Comprehensive Plan), Chapter 3, "Land Use, Growth and Orderly Annexation" re - guiding certain parcels from their existing Industrial designations to alternative Industrial and Employment categories, and amending the text of the Plan to add flexibility for implementation of the Plan's goals and land use objectives. Applicant: City of Monticello. Prepared by: Meeting Date: Council Date (pending Northwest Associated Consultants Commission action): (NAC), Community Development 03/07/2023 03/27/2023 Director Additional Analysis by: Chief Building & Zoning Official, Economic Development Manager ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS Decision 1: Consideration of Amendment to the Monticello Comprehensive Plan Reguiding Subject Properties from General Industrial to Light Industrial Park and Amending the Light Industrial Park Land Use Designation Text of The Monticello Comprehensive Plan - Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan 1. Motion to adopt Resolution No. PC -2023-09 recommending approval of Amendments to the Comprehensive Plan Land Use map and categories reguiding certain properties from General Industrial to Light Industrial Park, and amending the text of the Plan to add flexibility for implementation of the Plan's goals and land use objectives, based on findings in said resolution. 2. Motion to deny the adoption of Resolution No. PC -2023-09 recommending approval of Amendments to the Comprehensive Plan Land Use map and categories reguiding certain properties from General Industrial to Light Industrial Park, and amending the text of the Plan to add flexibility for implementation of the Plan's goals and land use objectives, based on findings to be made by the Planning Commission. 3. Motion to table action on Resolution No. PC -2023-09. Decision 2: Consideration of Amendment to the Monticello Comprehensive Plan — Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan Reguiding Subject Properties from General Industrial to Regional Commercial Planning Commission Agenda — 03/07/2023 1. Motion to adopt Resolution No. PC -2023-10 recommending approval of Amendments to the Comprehensive Plan Land Use map and categories reguiding certain properties from General Industrial to Regional Commercial for implementation of the Plan's goals and land use objectives, based on findings in said resolution. 2. Motion to deny the adoption of Resolution No. PC -2023-10 recommending approval of Amendments to the Comprehensive Plan Land Use map and categories reguiding certain properties from General Industrial to Regional Commercial for implementation of the Plan's goals and land use objectives, based on findings to be made by the Planning Commission. 3. Motion to table action on Resolution No. PC -2023-10. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND Property: Legal Description: Multiple Properties PID #: Multiple Properties Planning Case Number: 2023-10 Request(s): See attached aerial image Deadline for Decision: NA Land Use Designation: General Industrial Zoning Designation: 1-1 (Light Industrial) and B-4 (Regional Commercial) Districts Overlays/Environmental Regulations Applicable: NA Current Site Uses: Vacant Building Surrounding Land Uses: North: 1-94 East: Office South: Office -Industrial West: School Bus Storage Project Description: The current land use map in the Monticello Comprehensive Plan designates a large area of the City's industrial development for General Industrial, which per Comprehensive Plan text, refers to the 1-2 (Heavy Industrial) District as the companion zoning 2 Planning Commission Agenda — 03/07/2023 designation. Consistent with the City's goals for economic development, including tax base and employment in industrial districts, only a portion of this industrial area is intended to be utilized for heavy industrial uses. As such, this General Industrial designation appears to be an error in the original Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan land use map adoption. As such, the City is seeking amendments to the 2040 Plan to re -guide much of this area to be consistent with current and/or revised zoning. The City Council has called for a public hearing to be held by the Planning Commission on this item. ANALYSIS: This report addresses Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan land use designations for a specific subject area of the community lying east of State Trunk Highway 25 and south of Interstate 94. Land use designations are established by the City's adopted comprehensive plan, the Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan. Zoning districts are established through the City's adopted zoning ordinance and Official Zoning map. Land use designations provide the broad guidance and goals for growth and development for the city and its growth area, while the zoning ordinance provides the more specific and detailed regulatory standards intended to support the use and development of land with the Comprehensive Plan's goals. In reviewing a request to establish a commercial daycare facility in a vacant building at 108 Thomas Park Circle, City staff identified an issue relating to the Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan's adopted land use guidance for the subject area. The parcels within the area of Thomas Park Drive, and those north of Chelsea Road extending to the east of Fallon Avenue are nearly all currently zoned 1-1 (Light Industrial) District. However, the area is guided by the Comprehensive Plan for General Industrial land uses. But for a small handful of parcels (two owned by the City, including the Fire Department building, and a few commercial properties), the entire area from 1-94 south through the Oakwood Industrial Park is guided as General Industrial. The Monticello 2040 Plan's text cites that the General Industrial designation is intended to correlate to the 1-2 or Heavy Industrial zoning districts and its allowed uses, such as those that need separation from residential or commercial uses. The text of the 2040 Plan indicates that these areas may have the potential to generate off-site impacts including noise, odors, vibration and truck traffic and that buffering, screening and landscape treatments may be required to enhance public rights-of-way and ensure land use compatibility. The 1-2 (Heavy Planning Commission Agenda — 03/07/2023 Industrial) zoning district's permitted and conditional uses are therefore aligned with these types of land uses. Despite the General Industrial land use designation, only the parcels south of Chelsea Road are zoned 1-2, which is the zoning designation that the Comprehensive Plan identifies as being associated with the General Industrial category. Because the subject area proposed for re -guidance is predominately zoned 1-1 (Light Industrial) District and consists of a mix of interior industrial and office spaces not often considered as "heavy industrial" uses, and because much of the area abuts the freeway or other lands designated for commercial uses, staff believes that the appropriate land use designation for this area is Light Industrial Park or Employment Campus. These two land use classifications better align with the types of uses and the surrounding land uses in the area. In addition, the 1-1 (Light Industrial) District zoning designation is inconsistent with the General Industrial comprehensive plan designation's correlating zoning districts, which only lists the 1-2 district. Amending the 2040 land use plan to correct this discrepancy would clarify the City's land use goals, as well as the treatment of individual land use permitting in the area. Moreover, it would better coordinate the future land use with the reality of the district — both its existing use pattern and the neighboring land use pattern that serves as context. Within the subject area proposed for re -guidance, there are also a few commercially -zoned parcels. Those commercial parcels are used as an existing daycare site (located on the south side of Thomas Park Drive), and an office building at the southeast corner of Chelsea and Fallon Avenue. It is proposed that the Planning Commission consider three actions to address the noted issues: 1. Recommend approval of an amendment to the Monticello 2040 Land Use Map to re - guide the majority of parcels noted along Thomas Park Drive and east of Fallon Avenue to Light Industrial Park (LIP) consistent with their current 1-1 (Light Industrial) District zoning. a. In the alternative, the Planning Commission could recommend reguiding a portion of the properties along the freeway in the vicinity of Thomas Park Drive to Employment Campus and reguiding those parcels along the north side of Chelsea and east side of Fallon as Light Industrial Park. 2. Amend the Monticello 2040 Land Use text of the Light Industrial Park (LIP) land use designation to allow correlating zoning districts for both 1-1 (Light Industrial) and IBC (Industrial Business Campus) Districts. This expanded allowance to include IBC zoning 4 Planning Commission Agenda — 03/07/2023 provides the flexibility for the City to consider both light industrial uses, as well as a limited number of commercial uses which are compatible with and/or support industrial uses. The amendment also considers the area's proximity to other commercial uses and rights of way, providing for both appropriate transition uses and taking advantage of the city's freeway frontage. In this way, the City is able to determine on a case-by-case basis the precise implementation tool (that is, the zoning district and its regulations) that best meet the intent of the Comprehensive Plan for that area or site. 3. Recommend approval of an amendment to the Monticello 2040 Land Use Map to re - guide two parcels within the subject area to Regional Commercial consistent with their current B-4 (Regional Commercial) zoning. These are PIDs 155131001010 and 155018001011, as shown on Exhibit Z. STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION Planning staff recommends amendments to the Comprehensive Plan land use map, reguiding areas north of Chelsea Road and east of Fallon Avenue between Chelsea and Dundas from General Industrial to Light Industrial Park, and modification of the Light Industrial Park Comprehensive Plan text to add the IBC (Industrial Business Campus) District as an eligible zoning designation to its list of paired districts. This recommendation for amendment also incorporates a Community Commercial designation for the two parcels already zoned for commercial uses. Staff's recommendation is based on a finding that the proposed amendments achieve the following: 1. Corrects what staff believe to be an error in the adopted 2040 Land Use Map 2. Creates alignment between existing zoning and land use designations 3. Supports the City's Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan land use goals for business and employment areas, increasing opportunity for site utilization and providing for appropriate land uses along the 1-92 freeway frontage. SUPPORTING DATA A. Resolution PC -2023-09 B. Resolution PC -2023-10 C. Aerial Image D. Light Industrial Park—Proposed Parcels E. Regional Commercial — Proposed Parcels F. Excerpts, Monticello 2040 vision + Plan G. Monticello Official Zoning Map H. Monticello Zoning Ordinance, Excerpts 5 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2023-09 RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE MONTICELLO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REGUIDING SUBJECT PROPERTIES FROM GENERAL INDUSTRIAL TO LIGHT INDUSTRIAL PARK AND AMENDING THE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL PARK LAND USE DESIGNATION TEXT OF THE MONTICELLO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - MONTICELLO 2040 VISION + PLAN WHEREAS, within the Monticello 2040 Vison + Plan, the city's adopted comprehensive plan, the land use guidance for the subject parcels listed in Exhibit A is General Industrial; and WHEREAS, the General Industrial land use category is not supported by either the existing land uses, nor the existing zoning pattern and district; and WHEREAS, the subject parcels are situated in such a way that the appropriate land uses for the parcels, given surrounding conditions, freeway visibility, and other factors is directly aligned with the Monticello 2040 Vison + Plan's Light Industrial Park (LIP) land use designation; and WHEREAS, reguiding the subject property to Light Industrial Park implements the intent and goals of the Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, in concert with the reguidance of the subject parcels, the Light Industrial Park designation should be expanded to include the IBC (Industrial Business Park) District zoning to further the City's land use goals for industrial districts; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on March 7, 2023 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: 1. The change in land use category will continue to accommodate future and surrounding industrial use and development, as envisioned by the City's industrial and economic development goals. The change in use will have expected impacts on public services, including sewer, water, stormwater treatment, and traffic which have been planned to serve the property for the development as proposed. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2023-09 3. The industrial uses for the project area are consistent with the intent of the City's economic development objectives, as well as with the intent of the proposed zoning regulations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, that the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the Monticello City Council approves the amendment to the Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan's land use map on the subject parcels to Light Industrial Park (LIP), and to amend the text of the Monticello 2030 Vision + Plan to include the addition of IBC (Industrial Business Park) District as a correlating zoning district. ADOPTED this 7t" day of March, 2023, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. 1[�7►��[y����l]I�e1►1�11►[e��I�l► 11 I�Y.y[�1►1 Z ATTEST: Paul Konsor, Chair Angela Schumann, Community Development Director 2 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2023-09 EXHIBIT A - SUBJECT PARCELS REGUIDANCE FROM GENERAL INDUSTRIAL TO LIGHT INDSUTRIAL PARK 1. PID: 155-038-001060 Legal: Lot 6, Block 1, Thomas Park Address: 112 Thomas Park Circle, Monticello, MN 55362 2. PID: 155-038-001070 Legal: Lot 7, Block 1, Thomas Park Address: 114 Thomas Circle, Monticello, MN 55362 3. PID: 155-038-001080 Legal: Lot 8, Block 1, Thomas Park Address: 111 Thomas Park Drive, Monticello, MN 55362 4. PID: 155-038-001090 Legal: Lot 9, Block 1, Thomas Park Address: 113 Thomas Park Drive, Monticello, MN 55362 5. PID: 155-038-001100 Legal: Lot 10, Block 1, Thomas Park, except that part Lying East of the West 20.99 feet of said Lot 10. Address: 113 Thomas Park Drive, Monticello, MN 55362 6. PID: 155-038-001101 Legal: Lot 10, Block 1, Thomas Park, lying East of the West 20.99 feet of said Lot 10. Address: 115 Thomas Park Drive, Monticello, MN 55362. 7. PID: 155-038-001110 Legal: Lot 11, Block 1, Thomas Park Address: No Address 8. PID: 155-015-056000 Legal: Block 56, Lower Monticello, lying Easterly of Thomas Park Address: No Address 9. PID: 155-018-010021 Legal: North Half of Lot 2, Block 1, Oakwood Industrial Park Address: 119 Oakwood Drive East, Monticello, MN 55362 3 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2023-09 10. PID: 155-018-001031 Legal: North Half of Lot 3, Block 1, Oakwood Industrial Park Address: 114 Thomas Park Drive, Monticello, MN 55362 11. PID: 155-018-001030 Legal: Lot 3, Block 1, Oakwood Industrial Park, except the North Half of said Lot 3. Address: 113 Chelsea Road, Monticello, MN 55362 12. PID: 155-018-001041 Legal: Lot 4, Block 1, Oakwood Industrial Park Address: 201 Chelsea Road, Monticello, MN 55362 13. PID: 155-018-001050 Legal: Lot 5, Block 1, Oakwood Industrial Park Address: 203 Chelsea Road, Monticello, MN 55362 14. PID: 155-066-001010 Legal: Lot 1, Block 1, Remmele Addition Address: 213 Chelsea Road, Monticello, MN 55362 15. PID: 155-075-001010 Legal: Lot 1, Block 1, Barger Addition Address: 301 Chelsea Road, Monticello, MN 55362 16. PID: 155-085-001010 Legal: Lot 1, Block 1, Monticello Commerce Center 2nd Addition Address: 307 Chelsea Road, Monticello, MN 55362 17. PID: 155-131-001020 Legal: Lot 2, Block 1, Monticello Commerce Center 5t" Addition Address: No Address 18. PID: 155-131-001030 Legal: Lot 3, Block 1, Monticello Commerce Center 5t" Addition Address: 9696 Fallon Avenue NE, Monticello, MN 55362 19. PID: 155-092-002010 Legal: Lot 1, Block 2, Monticello Commerce Center 3rd Addition Address: 9668 Fallon Avenue NE, Monticello, MN 55362 20. PID: 155-092-001010 Legal: Lot 1, Block 1, Monticello Commerce Center Address: 9600 Fallon Avenue NE, Monticello, MN 55362 C! CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2023-09 21. PID: 155-081-001010 Legal: Lot 1, Block 1, Monticello Commerce Center 15` Addition Address: 9530 Fallon Avenue NF, Monticello, MN 55362 5 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2023-10 RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE MONTICELLO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN — MONTICELLO 2040 VISION + PLAN REGUIDING SUBJECT PROPERTIES FROM GENERAL INDUSTRIAL TO REGIONAL COMMERCIAL WHEREAS, within the Monticello 2040 Vison + Plan, the city's adopted comprehensive plan, the land use guidance for the subject parcels listed in Exhibit A is General Industrial; and WHEREAS, the General Industrial land use category is not supported by either the existing land uses, nor the existing zoning pattern and district; and WHEREAS, the subject parcels are situated in such a way that the appropriate land uses for the parcels, given surrounding conditions, freeway visibility, and other factors is directly aligned with the Monticello 2040 Vison + Plan's Regional Commercial land use designation; and WHEREAS, reguiding the subject property to Regional Commercial implements the intent and goals of the Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on March 7, 2023 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: The change in land use category will continue to accommodate existing and future regional commercial land use and development, as envisioned by the City's land use and economic development goals. The change in use will have expected impacts on public services, including sewer, water, stormwater treatment, and traffic which have been planned to serve the property for the development as proposed. 3. The commercial uses for the project area are consistent with the intent of the City's economic development objectives, as well as with the intent of the proposed zoning regulations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, that the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the Monticello City CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2023-10 Council approves the amendment to the Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan's land use map on the subject parcels to Regional Commercial (RC). ADOPTED this 7th day of March, 2023, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. 1[�7►��[y����l]I�e1►1�11►[e��I�l► 11 I�Y.y[�1►1 Paul Konsor, Chair ATTEST: Angela Schumann, Community Development Director EXHIBIT A - SUBJECT PARCELS REGUIDANCE FROM GENERAL INDUSTRIAL TO REGIONAL COMMERCIAL 2 Light Industrial Park - Proposed Parcels L___; City Boundary 1 in = 665 Ft 0 Parcels N CITY OF A �1 Monticello March 2, 2023 Map Powered By Datafi WS%, 1 w ❑ i fir. ir I/ 1 s•s2 H aytp �r 2 - • � 1•g� :yus _ � - _ i� 94 r 'r - .. - .. GhElSea Rd .. — _ .. •C;llr ti r�i R d - - -- RIJ r ►r 7 PE G66i se _ re Dundas Rd Dun Rd II. Tom IIS — aytp �r 2 - • � 1•g� :yus _ � - _ i� 94 r 'r - .. - .. GhElSea Rd .. — _ .. •C;llr ti r�i R d - - -- RIJ r ►r 7 PE G66i se _ re Dundas Rd Dun Rd i I CHAPTER 3: ND USE .. GROWTH AND ORDERLYANNEXATFON 47 FUTURE LAND USE MAP EMPLOYMENT AND INDUSTRIAL DESIGNATIONS Monticello currently contains approximately 194 acres of land used for industrial and employment purposes. The industrial land in Monticello is generally located in the Otter Creek Business Park, along Chelsea Road between Edmonson Avenue and Fenning Avenue, and the Cargill complex in downtown. The Future Land Use Map includes approximately 1,729 acres of industrial and employment designated land to promote a strong industrial business sector represented by increased jobs and tax revenue generated for Monticello. The goals for developing workforce and tax base are found in the Economic Development Chapter of this plan. Three designations classify industrial and employment generating uses. Light Industrial Park This designation encourages the broadest range of industrial related land uses, including warehousing and distribution. Three large areas of the City are designated as Light Industrial Park. This includes Otter Creek Business Park and parcels located directly to the north on Chelsea Road. Two large portions of the MOAA have also been designated as such, including portions of the Northwest Study Area and a large area just south of the city boundary on the east side of Highway 25. The planning objective for expanding the amount of industrially designated land is to increase the number and types of industrial and employment generating businesses in Monticello. General Industrial The General Industrial designation applies to areas centered along Chelsea and Dundas Roads. These areas include uses that may require automotive access for customer convenience, servicing of vehicles or equipment, loading or unloading, outdoor storage or parking of commercial service vehicles. Cargill's facility adjacent to the Downtown is also designated as General Industrial. Employment Campus An Employment Campus designation applies to areas of Monticello where a high concentration of jobs is desired. The design character of these areas includes site and building design elements that incorporate landscaping, screening, and building treatments that promote a high-quality visual environment. Open spaces and smaller commercial uses or restaurants may be intermixed to serve the employment base. Other permitted employment uses may include advanced manufacturing, research and development, technology and communications, and professional and corporate office uses. TABLE 3.4: FUTURE LAND USE EMPLOYMENT AND INDUSTRIAL ACREAGES Source: Cargill Kitchen Solutions Inc. Source: WGI Industries MONTICELLO 2040 VISION + PLAN 61 Commercial Designations Downtown Mixed -Use 4 Community Commercial fi Regional Commercial Commercial and Residential Flex 70 Industrial Designations Light Employment Industrial General Campus Park Industrial ■ Other Designations Public and Institutional Xcel Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant 1 sum (9 Commercial Commercial Commercial Commercial Employment Industrial Industrial Public Uses Nuclear Power �bZBZ�Z Cornerstone Cub Cafe and Target NA Foods Catering Co. MONTICELLO 2040 VISION + PLAN Otter Creek NA Polaris Crossing BZW Monticello Great River Xcel Regional Energy Library EMPLOYMENT CAMPUS (EC) This designation primarily applies to areas used for research and development, medical laboratories, advanced manufacturing, green technology, renewable energy, computer technology, professional and corporate offices and industrial engineering facilities. Some commercial uses such as restaurants and hotels are also allowed. Characteristics such as noise, vibration and odor do not occur or do not generate significant impacts. Hazardous materials handling and storage may also occur but must be stored indoors or screened from the public right-of-way. The Employment Campus designation is characterized by a campus -like environment of one and two-story buildings on large parcels. It also provides a high level of amenities including pedestrian connections and architectural and landscape treatment that maintain high standards of visual quality in a campus like environment. Employment Research and Development Advanced Manufacturing Green Technology Renewable Resources • Professional and Corporate Offices • Industrial Engineering Facilities Commercial • Restaurant • Convenience Retail • Corporate Hotel Recreational • Plaza • Public Space Primary Mode Vehicular with access to collectors and arterials �i Transit or shuttle service Secondary Mode Pedestrian -friendly streetscape Bicycle facilities and parking • Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 0.50 to 0.75 • Height - Up to 6 stories • Lot Area - N/A ♦� 2018 Correlating Zoning District IBC Business Campus District 80 t((� LAND USE, GROWTH AND ORDERLY ANNEXATION LIGHT INDUSTRIAL PARK (LIP) The Light Industrial designation accommodates uses such as process and production manufacturing which uses moderate amounts of partially processed materials, warehousing and distribution, research and development, medical laboratories, machine shops, computer technology, professional and corporate offices and industrial engineering facilities. Characteristics such as noise, vibration and odor do not occur or do not generate significant impacts. Hazardous materials handling and storage may also occur but must be stored indoors or screened from the public right-of-way. Activities such as the handling of hazardous materials and outdoor storage are limited. Industrial • Warehousing and Distribution • Manufacturing • Research and Development • Medical Laboratories • Computer Technology • Professional and Corporate Offices Commercial • Office • Service -based Secondary Mode Shared bike/ pedestrian facilities • Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 0.50 to 0.75 • Height - Up to 4 stories • Lot Area - N/A ♦\ 2018 Correlating J Zoning District 1-1 Light Industrial District MONTICELLO 2040 VISION + PLAN 81 Primary Mode Vehicular with access to collectors and arterials F� Transit or shuttle service Secondary Mode Shared bike/ pedestrian facilities • Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 0.50 to 0.75 • Height - Up to 4 stories • Lot Area - N/A ♦\ 2018 Correlating J Zoning District 1-1 Light Industrial District MONTICELLO 2040 VISION + PLAN 81 GENERAL INDUSTRIAL (GIS This designation includes manufacturing, wholesale trade, production brewing, corporation and contracting yards and other industrial uses that may need separation from residential or commercial uses. This designation also accommodates a variety of local -serving industrial uses which are generally oriented toward local businesses and residents. These include auto repair and servicing, machine shops, artisan, crafts, woodworking and metallurgy, construction and contracting, equipment and vehicle rental, small warehouse and delivery operations, self -storage facilities, small wholesalers, and other small-scale industrial operations. A limited number of offices, commercial uses, and production and assembly uses also occur within these areas. These areas may have the potential to generate off-site impacts including noise, odors, vibration and truck traffic. Buffering, screening and landscape treatments may be required to enhance public rights-of-way and ensure land use compatibility. Industrial • Light Manufacturing • Small warehouse and delivery operations • Recycling Facilities • Production Brewing • Construction and Contracting Yards Commercial • Accessory Uses • Office -AM ■■ LOT PATTERN Secondary Mode Shared bike/ pedestrian facilities • Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 0.50 to 0.75 • Height - Up to 2 stories • Lot Area - N/A '♦1 2018 Correlating J Zoning District 1-2 Heavy Industrial District 82 (« LAND USE, GROWTH AND ORDERLY ANNEXATION Primary Mode Vehicular with access to collectors and arterials 1F Transit or shuttle service Secondary Mode Shared bike/ pedestrian facilities • Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 0.50 to 0.75 • Height - Up to 2 stories • Lot Area - N/A '♦1 2018 Correlating J Zoning District 1-2 Heavy Industrial District 82 (« LAND USE, GROWTH AND ORDERLY ANNEXATION § 153.090 USE TABLE. (A) Explanation of use table structure. (1) Organization of Table 5-1. Table 5-1 organizes all principal uses by use classifications and use types. (a) Use classifications. The use classifications are: agricultural uses; residential uses; civic and institutional uses; office use; commercial uses; and industrial uses. The use classifications provide a systematic basis for assigning present and future land uses into broad general classifications (e.g., residential and commercial uses). The use classifications then organize land uses and activities into specific "use types" based on common functional, product, or physical characteristics, such as the type and amount of activity, the type of customers or residents, how goods or services are sold or delivered and site conditions. (b) Use types. The specific use types identify the specific uses that are considered to fall within characteristics identified in the use classifications. For example; detached dwellings, parks and recreational areas, and schools are "use types" in the Single-family Residence District. (2) Symbols used in Table 5-1 (a) Permitted Uses= P. A "P" indicates that a use is permitted by right, subject to compliance with all other applicable provisions of this chapter. Uses may be subject to special regulations as referenced in the "additional requirements" column. (b) Conditionally Permitted Uses = C. A "C" indicates that a use is permitted provided the city can establish conditions necessary to ensure the use is compatible to the proposed location and surrounding properties. Inability of the city to establish conditions to adequately control anticipated impacts is justification for denial of a conditionally permitted use. Conditional uses may also be subject to special regulations as referenced in the "additional requirements" column. (c) Interim Permitted Uses= /.An "I" indicates that a use maybe permitted for a brief period of time provided certain conditions are met, and a specific event or date can be established for discontinuance of the use. Inability of the city to establish conditions to adequately control anticipated impacts is justification for denial of an interim permitted use. Interim permitted uses may also be subject to special regulations as referenced in the "additional requirements" column. (d) Prohibited Uses = Shaded cel/s.A shaded cell indicates that the listed use is prohibited in the respective base zoning district. (e) Uses not provided for within zoning districts. In any zoning district, whenever a proposed use is neither specifically allowed nor denied, the Community Development Department shall determine if the proposed use is comparable in potential activities and impacts to a use listed within the zoning district and is acceptable related to land use compatibility, traffic, and/or nuisance issues and established conditions and standards relating to development of the use. Where such a determination is made, the requirements established for the listed use shall apply as minimum standards for the proposed use. Additional requirements may be applied to address differences between the listed use and the proposed use. If no comparable use determination can be made, the use will be considered prohibited in which case an amendment to the ordinance text would be required to clarify if, where and how a proposed use could be established. TABLE 5-1: USES BY DISTRICT Use Types Base Zoning Districts Additional Requirements «P„ _ Permitted "C., _ Conditionally A R R R T M B I I I Permitted O A 1 2 N R3 R4 H 1 B2 B3 64 CCD BC 1 2 "I" = Interim Permitted TABLE 5-1: USES BY DISTRICT Use Types Base Zoning Districts Additional Requirements «P„ _ Permitted «C„ _ Conditionally A R R R T M B I I I Permitted O A 1 2 N R3 R4 H 1 B2 B3 B4 CCD BC 1 2 "I" = Interim Permitted Agricultural Uses § 153.091(B) Agriculture P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P (1) Agricultural P § 153.091(B) Sales (2) Community P P P P P P P P P❑ § 153.091(B) Gardens () § 153.091(B) Stables CE❑ (4) Residential Uses § 153.091(C) (1) Attached Dwelling Types § 153.091(C)(2)(a ) Duplex P C § 153.091(C) See (2)(b ) Townhouse C PEIE E Table § 153.091(C) 5- 1A (2)(c ) Multiple- C P C C § 153.091(C) family (2)(d ) None Detached P P P P P P Dwelling Group residential P P P P P § 153.091(C) facility, single- (3) family Group residential C C C § 153.091(C) facility, multi- (3) family § 153.091(C) Mobile and manufactured C C C P C (4) home park TABLE 5-1: USES BY DISTRICT Use Types Base Zoning Districts Additional Requirements "P„ _ Permitted «C„ _ Conditionally A R R R T M B 1 1 Permitted O A 1 2 N R3 R4 H 1 B2 B3 B4 CCD BC 11 2 "I" = Interim Permitted TABLE 5-1: USES BY DISTRICT Use Types Base Zoning Districts Additional Requirements "Pyl Permitted „C„= Conditionally A R R R T M B 1 1 Permitted O A 1 2 N R3 R4 H 1 B2 B3 B4 CCD BC 11 2 "7” = Interim Permitted Civic and Institutional Uses Active park facilities P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P None (public) Active park facilities P P P P P P P § 153.091(D) (private) (1) Assisted living C I P C 1 C P § 153.091(D) facilities (2) Cemeteries C C C C C C C § 153.091(D) (3) C None Clinics/medical C P P services Essential P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P None services Hospitals C P P C § 153.091(D) (4) Nursing/ See § 153.091(D) convalescent C C C C C C C C C C P Table (5) home 5- 1A C None Passenger C C C terminal Passive parks and open P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P space § 153.091(D) Place of public C C C C CP C assembly (6) 153.091(D) Public buildings or C C C C C C C P C C P P C P P§ (7) uses Public § 153.091(D) warehousing I 1 1 (8) temporary C I I § 153.091(D) Schools, K-12 C C C C C (9) Schools, higher C education Utilities (major) C C C § 153.091(D) (10) TABLE 5-1: USES BY DISTRICT Use Types Base Zoning Districts Additional Requirements «P, _ Permitted "C„ _ Conditionally A R R R T M B 1 1 Permitted O A 1 2 N R3 R4 H 1 B2 B3 B4 CCD BC 11 2 "I" = Interim Permitted TABLE 5-1: USES BY DISTRICT Use Types Base Zoning Districts Additional Requirements "P" = Permitted «C" _ Conditionally Permitted A R R R T R3 R4 M B B2 B3 B4 CCD I 11 I O A 1 2 N H 1 BC 2 "I" = Interim Permitted Commercial Uses Adult uses P P § 153.046(T) Auction house C § 153.091(E) (2) P P § 153.091(E) Auto repair - C C minor 1(3) Automotive wash P C § 153.091(E) facilities (4) Bed and C C C C C § 153.091(E) breakfasts (5) Brew pub P P § 153.091(E) (6) P P P None Business support P P services Commercial C P P § 153.091(E) lodging (7) P § 153.091(F) Commercial self- C storage See (3) P P P § 153.091(E) Communications/ P Table broadcasting 5- (8) Convenience C P P P 1A § 153.091(E) retail (9) § 153.091(E) Country clubC (10) P C § 153.091(E) Day care centersC C P (11) Entertainment/ recreation, P P C C C§ 153.091(E) indoor (12) commercial Entertainment/ recreation, CC C C § 153.091(E) outdoor (13) commercial Event centerLLHL C C C § T(15) 153.091(E)14) Financial I �F P C P § 153.091(E) institution TABLE 5-1: USES BY DISTRICT Use Types Base Zoning Districts Additional Requirements "P„ _ Permitted «C„ _ Conditionally A R R R T M B 1 1 Permitted O A 1 2 N R3 R4 H 1 B2 B3 B4 CCD BC 11 2 "7" = Interim Permitted TABLE 5-1: USES BY DISTRICT Use Types Base Zoning Districts Additional Requirements Permitted „C„= Conditionally A R R R T R3 R4 M B B2 B3 B4 CCD 1 11 1 Permitted O A 1 2 N H 1 BC 2 "7” = Interim Permitted Commercial Uses Funeral P P § 153.091(E) services (16) Kennels C § 153.091(E) (commercial) (17) § 153.091(E) Landscaping/ nursery P (18) business Offices, commercial 153.091(E) and P P P P P P P§ (20) professional services Personal C P P P § 153.091(E) services (22) Production brewery or micro- p p § 153.091(F) distillery (12) without taproom See Production brewery or Table § 153.091(E) micro- C C 5 1A C C C (23) distillery with § 153.091(F) taproom or (13) cocktail room Recreational § 153.091(E) vehicle camp C (24) site Repair C P P P P§ 153.091(E) establishment (25) Restaurants C P P C § 153.091(E) (26) Retail commercial uses (other) P P P § 153.091(E) buildings less (27) than 10,000 sq. ft. Retail commercial § 153.091(E) uses (other) C P P (27) buildings over 10,000 sq. ft. TABLE 5-1: USES BY DISTRICT Use Types Base Zoning Districts Additional Requirements «P„ _ Permitted "C., _ Conditionally A R R R T M B 1 1 Permitted O A 1 2 N R3 R4 H 1 B2 B3 B4 CCD BC 11 2 "I" = Interim Permitted TABLE 5-1: USES BY DISTRICT Use Types yp Base Zoning Districts Additional Requirements Permitted "C„ _ Conditionally A R R R T R3 R4 M B B2 B3 B4 CCD 1 11 1 Permitted O A 1 2 N H 1 BC 2 "I" = Interim Permitted Commercial Uses Retail service in the Pointes P P P P § 153.048 at Cedar Specialty § 153.091(E) eating U C P P P (28) establishments I § 153.091(E) Vehicle fuel LIED 1C C C sales (29) § 153.091(E) Vehicle sales C and rental (30) Veterinary C § 153.091(E) facilities (rural) (31) § 153.091(E) Veterinary facilities C C C (31) (neighborhood) P P P None Wholesale EFLLL11 sales See Industrial Uses Auto repair -§ C P P 153.091(F) major Table 5- (1 ) Bulk fuel sales C § 153.091(F) and storage 1A (2) Contractor's § 153.091(F) yard, I I I (4) temporary I I § 153.091(F) Extraction of minerals (5) §) 53.091 (F) General��❑ warehousing C P P 6 §) 53.091 (F) Heavy���❑ manufacturing C 7 Industrial ��❑ C P None services § 153.091 (F) Industrial self- storage C C (8) facilities Land C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C§ 153.091(F) reclamation (9) TABLE 5-1: USES BY DISTRICT Use Types Base Zoning Districts Additional Requirements „P„ _ Permitted „C„ _ Conditionally A R R R T M B 1 1 Permitted O A 1 2 N R3 R4 H 1 B2 B3 B4 CCD BC 11 2 "I" = Interim Permitted TABLE 5-1: USES BY DISTRICT Use Types Base Zoning Districts Additional Riverfront (A) Broadway (B) Requirements «P„ _ General Notes Permitted Cedar (C) CCD Retail, Office, Entertainment «C„ _ supported large Housing, Use and open supported by by space supported Types space, entertainment; Conditionally A R R R T supported by housing 2nd M B retail and I retail I Permitted O A 1 2 N R3 R4 H 1 B2 B3 B4 CCD BC 11 2 walnut & "7" = Interim General Notes Cedar (C) (D) CCD Office, PermittedLLL Entertainment Retail, large Housing, and open Retail supported space supported Use Types space, supported by Industrial Uses Light by limited supported by entertainment; housing users, retail and retail housing 2nd and P PP § 153.091(F) manufacturing services retail service Additional use requirements applicable per § 153.091 Uses: Residential Uses Single- family (10) Machinery/truck CUP *Upper floors only Multi 3 du or P* CUP* § 153.091(F) repair and *Upper under floors only *Townhous C (11) sales es on Townhouse CUP CUP* CUP P Broadway See Recycling and only C § 153.091(F) salvage center Table 5- 1A (14) Truck or freight C § 153.091(F) 1(15) terminal Waste disposal C § 153.091(F) and incineration (16) Wrecker andP LCI § 153.091(F) towing services ---L (17) TABLE 5-1A: CENTRAL COMMUNITY DISTRICT (CCD) USES SUB -AREA Riverfront (A) Broadway (B) walnut & pine (D) General Notes Cedar (C) CCD Retail, Office, Entertainment Retail, supported large Housing, Use and open supported by by space supported Types space, entertainment; housing retail by limited supported by housing 2nd and users, retail and retail and retail services services service TABLE 5-1A: CENTRAL COMMUNITY DISTRICT (CCD) USES SUB -AREA Riverfront (A) Broadway (B) walnut & Pine General Notes Cedar (C) (D) CCD Office, Entertainment Retail, large Housing, and open Retail supported space supported Use Types space, supported by by retail by limited supported by entertainment; housing users, retail and retail housing 2nd and and services services retail service Additional use requirements applicable per § 153.091 Uses: Residential Uses Single- family P* CUP *Upper floors only Multi 3 du or P* CUP* P *Upper under floors only *Townhous es on Townhouse CUP CUP* CUP P Broadway east of Pine only Multi 4-12 du CUP CUP CUP CUP Multi 13+ du CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP *Allowed on ground floor for Ground floor CUP* P P townhouses on Broadway east of Pine Commercial Brew Pub P P P P <10,000 sq. ft. Brew Pub CUP P CUP P >10,000 sq. ft. Commercial CUP CUP P Day Care Commercial P CUP CUP P Lodging Uses: Commercial Entertainme nt/Recreation, Indoor CUP* CUP* CUP* CUP <10,000 sq. Commercial ft. only (including theaters) Entertainme nt/Recreation Outdoor Commercial Subject to § Event centers CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP 153.091(F) (14 ) Funeral CUP services Personal P P P P CUP services Places of public CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP assembly Production brewery/ P P P P taproom Micro - distillery/ P P P P cocktail room Professional Upper office — CUP* P P P P floors sere and preferred retail CUP* - not P/CUP* on P/CUP* Upper Commercial allowed on ground on P floors office ground floor floor ground preferred floor Financial P P P P Drive thru by CUP Restaurants, bars <10,000 P P P P CUP sq. ft. Restaurants, bars > 10,000 CUP P CUP P CUP sq. ft. Retail Sales <10,000 sq. ft. P P P P P Retail Sales CUP CUP CUP P CUP >10,000 sq. ft. Retail with CUP P P P P service Specialty Eating P P P P CUP Establishments <10,000 sq. ft. Vehicle fuel CUP sales Veterinary No outdoor facilities < CUP CUP CUP CUP 10,000 sq. ft. I I I I uses I Industrial Uses Industrial PUD PUD Only PUD Only Civic and Institutional Uses Clinics/ medical CUP CUP P P services Public buildings or P CUP P CUP CUP uses (incl. public parks) Schools Pre- CUP CUP CUP K-12 TABLE 544 THE POINTES AT CEDAR DISTRICT (PCD) See § 153.048 (Ord. 780, passed 7-25-2022; Ord. 791, passed 11-14-2022) Planning Commission Agenda — 03/07/2023 2D. Public Hearing - Consideration of an Amendment to the Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan (Comprehensive Plan), Chapter 3, "Land Use, Growth and Orderly Annexation" as related to Future Land Use Designations and Mar): Consideration of Rezoning 108 Thomas Circle from 1-1, Light Industrial District to Industrial Business Campus (IBC District. Applicant: Darrin Juve Prepared by: Meeting Date: Council Date (pending Northwest Associated Consultants Commission action): (NAC) 03/07/2023 03/27/2023 Additional Analysis by: Community Development Director, Chief Building & Zoning Official, Economic Development Manager ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS Decision 1: Consideration of an amendment to the Monticello Comprehensive Plan 1. Motion to adopt Resolution No. PC -2023-011 recommending approval of Amendment to the Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan (Comprehensive Plan), Chapter 3, "Land Use, Growth and Orderly Annexation" as related to Future Land Use Designations and Map, based on findings in said resolution. 2. Motion to deny the adoption of Resolution No. PC -2023-011 recommending approval of Amendment to the Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan (Comprehensive Plan), Chapter 3, "Land Use, Growth and Orderly Annexation" as related to Future Land Use Designations and Map based on findings to be made by the Planning Commission. 3. Motion to table action on Resolution No. PC -2023-011. Decision 2: Consideration of Rezoning 108 Thomas Circle from 1-1, Light Industrial District to Industrial Business Campus (IBC) 1. Motion to adopt Resolution No. PC -2023-012 recommending adoption of Ordinance No X, rezoning 108 Thomas Circle from 1-1, Light Industrial District to Industrial Business Campus (IBC), based on findings in said resolution. 2. Motion to deny the adoption of Resolution No. PC -2023-012 recommending Rezoning 108 Thomas Circle from 1-1, Light Industrial District to Industrial Business Campus (IBC), based on findings to be made by the Planning Commission. 3. Motion to table action on Resolution No. PC -2023-12. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND Property: Legal Description PID #: Planning Case Number: 2023-08 Planning Commission Agenda — 03/07/2023 Lot 5, Block 1, Thomas Park 155038001050 Request(s): 1. Amendment to the Monticello Comprehensive Plan to reguide the land use designation on the subject property from General Industrial to a category supporting the use of the property for childcare center. 2. Amendment to the Zoning Map to rezone the subject parcel from 1-1 to IBC to establish a zoning district on the subject property supporting the use of the property for childcare center. Deadline for Decision: April 7, 2023 (60 -day deadline) June 6, 2023 (120 -day deadline) Land Use Designation: General Industrial Zoning Designation: 1-1, Light Industrial Overlays/Environmental Regulations Applicable: NA Current Site Uses: Vacant Building Surrounding Land Uses: North: 1-94 East: Office South: Light Industrial/Office West: School Bus Storage Project Description: The applicant seeks amendments to the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning District maps and language to allow the use of the building and subject property as a childcare center. The current zoning limits childcare facilities as accessory uses to larger industrial operations under the 1-1 zoning district. In addition, the current land use designation directs the property to heavy industrial zoning. Modification of these designations would be required to 2 Planning Commission Agenda — 03/07/2023 accommodate the use on the property as a principal use, under the proposed Industrial Business Campus (IBC) zoning. ANALYSIS: Discussion about this issue began with the request to establish a commercial daycare facility in a vacant building at 108 Thomas Park Circle. The site is zoned 1-1 (Light Industrial) District, as are nearly all of the properties around Thomas Park, and those north of Chelsea Road extending to the east past Fallon Avenue. The area is guided by the Comprehensive Plan as General Industrial. But for a small handful of parcels (two owned by the City, including the Fire Department building, and a few commercial properties), the entire area from 1-94 south through the Oakwood Industrial Park is currently guided in General Industrial. Despite this land use designation, only the parcels south of Chelsea Road are zoned 1-2, which is the zoning designation that the Comprehensive Plan identifies as being associated with the General Industrial category. North of Chelsea, the primary zoning is the 1-1 Light Industrial designation as noted above, with a few commercially -zoned parcels. Those commercial parcels include the two City properties, and an existing daycare site on Thomas Park Drive, just a short block south of the subject property. Other uses in the area include a variety of office uses, a portion of the bus sales and bus service business and storage, and a self -storage facility, among other uses. The 108 Thomas Park Circle parcel in question gains its access from the Thomas Park Circle cul- de-sac, and abuts 1-94 on its rear property line, as do other parcels in the district. To accommodate a commercial day care facility in this location, the City needs to consider an amendment to its zoning regulations. As currently written, the 1-1 District allows day care by Conditional Use Permit, but only as an ancillary use to another industrial principal use. The limitation is as follows: (d) In addition to items (a) through (c) above, day care centers in the I-1 district, shall adhere to the following additional requirements: (i) Only be allowed as a secondary combination use which complements a primary business; (ii) Only be conducted in the principal building, and not exceed 20% of the total principal building square footage; (iii) Be physically separated from the other activities occurring in the principal building; Planning Commission Agenda — 03/07/2023 (iv) Not have a dedicated entrance (other than emergency exits) from the exterior of the principal building; (v) Not have dedicated off-street parking or signage. Day care uses are currently allowed in the IBC (Industrial Business Campus) zoning district as a permitted use, and in the City's Business zoning districts. The limitations above apply specifically to the 1-1 zoning district. They appear to have been designed to accommodate day care for Industrial users that provide daycare as an employment benefit on-site, but not available to other non-employee day care customers. In many ways, a commercial day care use in the proposed location appears to be an appropriate land use. It is in proximity to major employment generators, where day care is a significant need. It has freeway exposure which is valuable to such ventures. Staff believes that the use should be accommodated — it is the interrelated web of zoning district, zoning standards, and land use categories that require some sort of amendment. In researching the City's response to the request at 108 Thomas Park Circle, a review of the current land use and zoning patterns was undertaken. As noted in the staff report for Item 2C of the March 7, 2023 Commission agenda, and as discussed above, the land use and zoning designations do not match what the Comprehensive Plan envisions. Under the current structure, the 1-1 (Light Industrial) District is intended to be associated with the Light Industrial Park (LIP) land use designation. In this case, the 1-1 zoning dominates the area, but the guide plan calls for General Industrial, and therefore the 1-2 designation. As discussed in the companion City -initiated amendments to the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning regulations, staff believes that the land use and zoning patterns flowing from the prior Comprehensive Plan update project were incorrectly assigned. Rather than the General Industrial designation applied to the area (and the mismatched 1-1 zoning), the Plan should have identified the area as Light Industrial Park, or even Employment Campus. The former would have supported the 1-1 zoning that now exists —the latter would support the IBC zoning sought by the applicant. However, with the amendments as proposed in the City -initiated item, The Light Industrial Park (LIP) could also logically include a correlation to the IBC (Industrial Business Park) zoning district. Resolving the conflict on this particular site implicates a larger area, for reasons that include both the avoidance of a "spot -zoning" land use decision, but also because land use patterns should reflect the neighborhood in which they are located. The IBC zoning is viewed by staff as the appropriate zoning designation for this site, given the mix of office uses in the area, and exposure of many of the parcels to freeway visibility — an aspect of the IBC district that is intended to create a higher -finish presentation to passing traffic. 4 Planning Commission Agenda — 03/07/2023 As discussed in the City's application, the staff recommendation is to reguide the site (and the area) from the current General Industrial land use category to the designation that pairs with the IBC zoning — Light Industrial Park (LIP), and amend the Comprehensive Plan text for this category to add IBC to the current 1-1 zoning as an option for the land use implementation. Alternatively, the City could elect to guide portions of the area as Employment Campus (EC). Depending on the land use plan option chosen, both could lead to the IBC designation for the property in question, resulting in day care center as a permitted use of the existing building and site. STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION As noted, staff believes that the childcare use on this site is an appropriate use for its own purposes, as well as in support of other land uses in the immediate area that will benefit from this business use nearby. Staff therefore recommends approval of the rezoning to IBC from its current 1-1 district. The IBC best reflects the combination of factors that this site presents, which is a combined office -industrial land use pattern, with high freeway exposure, and very limited outdoor or heavy industrial activities. Depending on the City's decision related to the land use designation, staff further recommends amendment to the Comprehensive Plan as examined in the companion City -initiated amendment for the surrounding area. The option of reguiding the area, including the subject parcel to Light Industrial Park and adding the IBC to the Light Industrial Park text as a related zoning district would also accommodate the proposed childcare use. The alternative amendment to Employment Campus designation relates directly to the IBC (Industrial Business Campus) use. The decision for the City would be which land use category best reflects the long- term direction for the area overall. SUPPORTING DATA A. Resolution PC -2023-011, Comprehensive Plan Amendment B. Resolution PC -2023-012, Rezoning C. Ordinance No. X, Rezoning D. Aerial Site Image E. Applicant Narrative F. Except, Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan G. Rural Childcare Status Report, 2021 5 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2023-11 RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE MONTICELLO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REGUIDING THE SUBJECT PROPERTY GENERAL INDUSTRIAL TO LIGHT INDUSTRIAL PARK Lot 5, Block 1, Thomas Park PID: 155-038-001050 WHEREAS, the applicant proposes to occupy and remodel the existing property for Day Care (child care) use; and WHEREAS, the property is currently zoned 1-1 (Light Industrial) District, in which district Day Care (childcare) is allowed only in limited size as an accessory use; and WHEREAS, the site is guided for General Industrial uses in the City's Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the site is located in a district accommodates a variety of office and light industrial uses; and WHEREAS, the General Industrial land use category is not supported by either the existing land use, nor the existing zoning pattern; and WHEREAS, the subject property is situated in such a way that Day Care (childcare) is an appropriate land use for the site, given surrounding conditions, parcel site, freeway visibility, and other factors; and WHEREAS, the City's IBC District provides both an industrial use base, and the opportunity for Day Acre (childcare) uses on separate, but nearby, parcels; and WHEREAS, reguiding the subject property to Light Industrial Park, or a similar category that correlates to the IBC Zoning District implements the intent of the Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on March 7, 2023 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2023-11 1. The land use plan amendment provides an appropriate means of furthering the intent of the Comprehensive Plan for the site by accommodating the demand for child care services in proximity to major employment generators. 2. The proposed use on the site under the IBC Zoning District would be consistent with the needs of the development in this location and the adjoining surrounding industrial uses. 3. The change in land use category will facilitate the rezoning of the property as desired. 4. The change in land use category will continue to accommodate future and surrounding industrial use and development, as envisioned by the City's industrial and economic development goals. 5. The change in use will have expected impacts on public services, including sewer, water, stormwater treatment, and traffic which have been planned to serve the property for the development as proposed. 6. The industrial uses for the project area are consistent with the intent of the City's economic development objectives, as well as with the intent of the proposed zoning regulations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, that the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the Monticello City Council approves the amendment to the Comprehensive Plan's land use map on the subject property to Light Industrial Park and/or Employment Campus as needed to permit the child care use. ADOPTED this 7t" day of March, 2023, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION MI - ATTEST: Paul Paul Konsor, Chair Angela Schumann, Community Development Director 2 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2023-12 RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE MONTICELLO ZONING MAP, REZONING THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM 1-1, LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT TO IBC, INDUSTRIAL BUSINESS CAMPUS: Lot 5, Block 1, Thomas Park PID: 155-038-001050 WHEREAS, the applicant proposes to occupy and remodel the existing property for Day Care (childcare) use; and WHEREAS, the property is currently zoned 1-1 (Light Industrial) District, in which district a Day Care uses (childcare) is allowed only in limited size as an accessory use; and WHEREAS, the site is guided for General Industrial uses in the City's Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the site is located in a district accommodates a variety of office and light industrial uses; and WHEREAS, the City's IBC District provides both an industrial use base, and the opportunity for Day Care (childcare) uses on separate, but nearby, parcels; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on March 7, 2023 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: The Rezoning provides an appropriate means of furthering the intent of the Comprehensive Plan for the site by accommodating the demand for Day Care (childcare services) in proximity to major employment generators. The proposed use on the site under the IBC Zoning District would be consistent with the needs of the development in this location and the adjoining surrounding industrial uses. The change in zoning district will continue to accommodate future and surrounding industrial use and development, as envisioned by the City's industrial and economic development goals. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2023-12 4. The change in use will have expected impacts on public services, including sewer, water, stormwater treatment, and traffic which have been planned to serve the property for the development as proposed. 5.. The industrial uses for the project are consistent with the intent of the City's economic development objectives, as well as with the intent of the proposed zoning regulations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, that the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the Monticello City Council approves the rezoning of the subject property to IBC. Industrial Business Campus District. ADOPTED this 7t" day of March, 2023, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION IN ATTEST: Paul Konsor, Chair Angela Schumann, Community Development Director 2 ORDINANCE NO. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE XV OF THE MONTICELLO CITY CODE, KNOWN AS THE ZONING ORDINANCE, AMENDING THE MONTICELLO OFFICAL ZONING MAP BY REZONING THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY FROM 1-1, LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT TO IBC, INDUSTRIAL BUSINESS CAMPUS DISTRICT Lot 5, Block 1, Thomas Park PID: 155-038-001050 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO HEREBY ORDAINS: Section 1. The Official Zoning Map of the City of Monticello is hereby amended by rezoning of Lot 5, Block 1, Thomas Park (PID: 155-038-001050) from 1-1, Light Industrial District to IBC, Industrial Business Campus Section 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to mark the official zoning map to reflect this ordinance. The map shall not be republished at this time. Section 3. The City Clerk is hereby directed to make any changes required by this Ordinance as part of the Official Monticello City Code, Chapter XV Zoning Ordinance, and to renumber the tables and chapters accordingly as necessary to provide the intended effect of this Ordinance. The City Clerk is further directed to make necessary corrections to any internal citations that result from said renumbering process and map amendment, provided that such changes retain the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance as has been adopted. Section 5. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage and publication. The ordinance in its entirety and map shall be posted on the City website after publication. Copies of the complete Ordinance and map are available online and at Monticello City Hall for examination upon request. ADOPTED BYthe Monticello City Council this day of , 2023. ATTEST: Rachel Leonard, City Administrator Lloyd Hilgart, Mayor 1 ORDINANCE NO. AYES: NAYS: .. -■ter • �T.��, �Ty� �rysr yy. sT E I EQ'A E - 1.55029402DT4 155R 1.555001134Q3 l [oil 101 94 N� 15523740:1020 - 155237001'Q1Q 1555D0114401 � 155038Q01110 _ oy THWMAS PARK�DR moo 155018001050 1550660D1010 fry - VMS CHELSEA R1Q dip 155258 V 1552fi5000Q10 15501800202Q 155418002040 155258DD101D Z a �2 0 z O 155418002080 155230404010 O w ,jffFRAUENSHUH 17 COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE Narrative for the requested change and the reasons why the Comprehensive Plan should be amended per the request • Whether the proposed amendment corrects an error or addresses the need resulting from some changing condition, trend, or fact arising since the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan; Over time, this area has added various mixed uses within the designated zoning such as Kids Castle Daycare and Great River Soccer Club in nearby former industrial properties. The proposed zoning modification would help facilitate similar uses to further support the industrial companies and workers with childcare opportunities. We have been diligently working with the team from Tri -Valley Monticello Head Start Child & Family Program ("Tri - Valley") over the past five (5) months. Tri -Valley provides comprehensive child development services to children and families with a special emphasis on promoting children's school readiness. The program values parents and encourages them to become advocates for their children and for their community. They have been serving children in the Monticello area for over 20 years, leasing classrooms in the Eastview Education Center. Due to the growth of the Monticello School District, space has become limited for their programming, prompting them to find new space for program operations. The building in reference, 108 Thomas Circle in Monticello, fills that space need but is zoned as 1-1. Under the current zoning stipulations, this use is not allowed which is why we are seeking a rezoning to Business campus District ("IBC"). Whether the proposed amendment is consistent with the guiding principles of the Comprehensive Plan; Goals and Objectives of Comprehensive Plan (Pg.95)-Pertaining to land use and Zoning. 1: GROWTH AND CHANGE: A City that prioritizes growth inward by concentrating development activities within the existing city boundaries and grows or develops into the Orderly Annexation Area only when development is proposed or planned contiguous to city boundaries, sensitive open space lands are protected and thoughtfully incorporated into the development pattern, and the land is serviced by appropriate utility and transportation systems. As Monticello continues to grow, an IBC designation would provide for increased flexibility of supportive uses, like Tri - Valley, in this area. Without rezoning in this circumstance, local organizations like Tri -Valley would be forced to explore other market opportunities to support the needs of the residents in Monticello and the surrounding area. The building at 108 Thomas Circle sits in the heart of Monticello and has easy access to the surrounding roadways that connect it with the community making it an ideal candidate for this type of use; however, the current zoning of 1-1 does not permit this as currently written. If 108 Thomas Circle is rezoned as an IBC, later to become an Employment Campus (EC), it would permit daycare and childhood development centers to continue to operate and support the community. If Tri -Valley is permitted to occupy 108 Thomas Circle, they will continue their long legacy in the community to make sure no child is left behind! 2: COMPLETE NEIGHBORHOODS: A City that prioritizes growth inward by concentrating development activities within the existing city boundaries and grows or develops into the Orderly Annexation Area only when development is proposed or planned contiguous to city boundaries, sensitive open space lands are protected and thoughtfully incorporated into the development pattern, and the land is serviced by appropriate utility and transportation systems. An IBC/EC zoning allows a uses, such as Tri -valley, to further support the community and neighborhood like none other. Tri -Valley fills a tremendous void in the community by providing outstanding childcare for low-income families. This allows the parent(s) to stay within the workforce, while Tri -Care supports the family's needs and development, 952.829.3480 . frauenshuh.com 7101 West 781h Street • Minneapolis, MN 55439 Page 2 of 4 so no child is left behind. By bringing the youth of lower income families up to the education levels of their peers, Tri - Valley is helping to ensure the playing fields are leveled out. 3: SUCCESSFUL COMMERCIAL CORRIDORS AND CENTERS: Successful, vibrant commercial centers and corridors that can adapt over time and provide a place for shopping, services, civic activities, entertainment, and arts and culture. Rezoning 108 Thomas Circle will improve the vibrancy of the area through increased economic activity accompanied by the civic benefit of educated children and access to childcare for working parents. 4: REVITALIZED MIXED-USE DOWNTOWN: A revitalized mixed-use downtown that embraces the river and serves as the heart of the community and focus of civic activity that is lively throughout the day and night consisting of a variety of dining, shopping, recreation, celebrating, gathering, and living opportunities. Not applicable for this site. 5: ACTIVE EMPLOYMENT CENTERS: Monticello as a strong and growing regional employment center including a variety of economic sectors established as the preferred location for manufacturing, technology, research, and development, and home to a diverse mix of businesses and industries. By Rezoning 108 Thomas Circle to IBC, the city of Monticello is allowing uses consistent with the area's needs for regional employment and support for employees. It also will allow for this specific use which enables the continued operation of a non-profit whose role is childcare/early education in the community for free; allowing working parents to obtain employment in the nearby industries. Without Tri -Valley's active participation within the Monticello community many families will be left without attainable childcare and thus must remain home to care for their children and remove them from the workforce. In the last 10 years alone, Tri -Valley has been able to serve 1,123 low-income children and their families in Monticello. They additionally provide job opportunities to over 35 staff each year that includes PTO Accrual, 401 K/Roth IRA Contributions, Voluntary Benefits, and extensive Holiday Pay. They also not only provide care to the community's littlest and neediest learners but work with the parents to set and achieve goals that benefit their children, family and community. 6: NATURAL ENVIRONMENT, PARKS, AND OPEN SPACE: An open space "frame" around and woven through Monticello, complemented by the Mississippi River, Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park, other local and regional parks, trails and recreation areas which together protect the City's natural resources, lakes, wetlands and woodlands, and provide opportunities for recreation, enhance visual beauty, and shape the City's character. Rezoning 108 Thomas Circle into the IBC/EC would actively encourage a greener appearance especially with a daycare occupying the facility furthered by the incorporation of outdoor play areas and green spaces. 108 Thomas Circle sits with clear visibility to 1-94 and under its current zoning of 1-1/GI the site will remain a darkened building or an industrial use. • The extent to which the proposed amendment addresses a demonstrated community need; - A need to support and engage Active Employment Centers By Rezoning 108 Thomas Circle to IBC, the city of Monticello is allowing uses consistent with the area's needs for regional employment and support for employees. It also will allow for this specific use which enables the continued operation of a non-profit whose role is childcare/early education in the community for free; allowing working parents to obtain employment in the nearby industries. Without Tri -Valley's active participation within the Monticello Page 3 of 4 community many families will be left without attainable childcare and thus must remain home to care for their children and remove them from the workforce. In the last 10 years alone, Tri -Valley has been able to serve 1,123 low-income children and their families in Monticello. They additionally provide job opportunities to over 35 staff each year that includes PTO Accrual, 401 K/Roth IRA Contributions, Voluntary Benefits, and extensive Holiday Pay. They also not only provide care to the community's littlest and neediest learners, but work with the parents to set and achieve goals that benefit their children, family and community. Whether the proposed amendment will protect the health, safety, morals, and general welfare of the public; Tri -Valley address the mental/educational welfare of the lower income community of Monticello, but also the nutritional well-being of children is a vital component of the Head Start Program as well. Tri -Valley's classrooms implement Farm to Early Care sourcing local products when able to ensure children are provided homemade, nutrition meals while learning about food and nutrition within their classroom. They also recognize that health is at the foundation of school readiness. Their goal is to ensure that all child health and developmental concerns are identified. To help children thrive, health staff ensure that children are up to date on immunizations as well as child checkups, dental exams and learning healthy habits. Families are also linked to an ongoing source of continuous, accessible care in the community to meet their health needs. • The impacts on the natural and built environments, including air, water, noise, stormwater management, wildlife habitat, water quality, vegetation, drainage, streets, and other engineering design or environmental factors; 108 Thomas Circle sits adjacent to 1-94 making it one of the buildings that tens of thousands drive by each day. Rezoning the site to IBC will allow for more uses than the current zoning of 1-1/GI would permit, allowing for more opportunities to allow for safer, cleaner, and beautiful uses along 1-94 that will further define the city of Monticello. An IBC with a future designation of EC makes logical sense to allow for increased use options that improve the overall environment in Monticello since the use is no longer manufacturing or industrial related. Industrial buildings often are low energy efficiency buildings that do little to promote community engagement. 1-94 connects Monticello with the rest of the state of Minnesota and therefore we propose an IBC/EC zoning to allow more uses to showcase Monticello and its growth from darkened industrial buildings to green and welcoming office/mixed-used engineering feats. • Whether the proposed amendment is compatible with existing and proposed uses surrounding the subject property; whether the proposed design and land uses are appropriate for the land; and whether the proposed amendment will maintain or improve compatibility among uses and ensure efficient development within the City; This immediate area has been trending towards more mixed-use development, including Kids Castle Daycare and Great River Soccer Club in nearby former industrial properties. The proposed zoning modification would help facilitate uses that arise from this trend. One of the adjacent sites is occupied by Hogland Bus Company, an outside storage use, and the other site is occupied by Twin City Staffing, an office use. Both are zoned 1-1. While the Hogland Bus company does represent some of the industrial in the area, the Twin City Staffing building plus the other additional sites around 108 Thomas Circle represent more of a mixed-use trend making an IBC/EC a logical fit as it can accommodate more use types, and thus making it more compatible with its surrounding uses. Whether the proposed amendment will result in a logical, orderly and predictable development pattern; and Page 4 of 4 As the Monticello community continues to grow, especially the industries, the need will arise for more mixed -used development along the 1-94 Corridor. Childcare needs will especially take off as the number of adults in the workforce will increase as the city grows. The current zoning will not allow such uses, as well as many other complimentary/supportive services that are necessary for the attraction and retention of workers. Rezoning is logical to keep many different uses in the community as they are serving a need that comes with the development and growth of a community and its workforce. Whether the proposed amendment is consistent with the purpose of this ordinance. Not Applicable for this site. JffFRAUENSHUH + COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE See below for the legal description of all real property located at 108 Thomas Circle, Monticello MN 55362: • Sect -11 Twp -121 Range -025 THOMAS PARK Lot -005 Block -001 108 THOMAS CIR MONTICELLO MN 55362 952.829.3480 : frauenshuh.com 7101 West 78t1 Street # Minneapolis, MN 55439 �1 FRAUENS HUH r COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE The existing and proposed land use and zoning designations for all properties proposed to change Current existing Land Use and Zoning Designation for 108 Thomas Circle, Monticello MN 55362 • Existing Land Use: Office • Existing Zoning: 108 Thomas Circle is currently zoned Light Industrial(I-1) as shown by the Official Zoning Map below: Legend Base Zoning Districts Residential Districts Business and Mixed - RA Use Districts R-1 C &1 r- 62 0 0.2 &3 Water Booies Regional Commercial (RC) �R'3 CCD- I Development Reserve (DR) �fcD' M� Overlay Districts h0 r Paned 0-1.y D� Industrial DWiets O seaelbd D, -- ® a =-: spe>d urc Dela Estate Resioenaal(ER) r -.Y-- pNM1.1,— • 3-2-_, - k pec'k."'b . & F x 5— Sign r Deva PODS Sw, Rlw � Twn pea Mv�lydo Fllph Stlml � lK N6 Fli F— Ebnmroo Rdpe I� Ra0lboetl Ewpr 11 dieon Spa1h IntluIDnl Pnk d.n" *.W E1pnKAo ARndWi. Si -+q" lillils 9"q IRpok MWpe H. -Mu L.11 - R— siM S H.O.W Rus PRrk matt - o M !bd S2 Drpi,, • _------�.�`� C—. aue w 2,d Add,!— City of Monticello Official Zoning .. I • Existing 2040 Zoning: The 2040 Land Use guide has 108 Thomas Circle guided as General Industrial as shown by the Official 2040 Zoning Map below: cels Manufactured Home lMH) I. streets ® Doantorm Mixed USE, (DMU) ++E* Railroad Community Commercial(CCi Water Booies Regional Commercial (RC) I Development Reserve (DR) Commeroa and Resdenl,a' PI Open Space and Resource Conservator CSRC) � Employm"I Campus (ECI r guided J Site IIS guided Gry Parks and Recreation (PR) Light Industrial Para (LIP) -1 Estate Resioenaal(ER) Genera lndusmal(GI) l� Low Density Residential (LDR) public and In5LID0oaal (P) D Traditional Resdential (TRI Xce Mom,el 0 Nuclear Generating Plant 0 North 952.829.3480 frauenshuh.com ' 7101 West 78t1 Street - Minneapolis, MN 55439 Site is currently 1-1 Page 2 of 3 Official breakdown of the Light Industrial District: Section 3.6 1.1 Light Industrial District The purpose of the "i-1," light industrial, district is to provide for the establishment of warehousing and light industrial development. City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 12- Page 3 of 3 Proposed Land Use and Zoning designation for 108 Thomas Circle: • Proposed Land Use: Day Care Centers • Proposed Zoning designation: We propose to change the future Zoning designation for 108 Thomas Circle to Indusrial and Business Campus District: Official breakdown of the Industrial and Business Campus District: Section 3.6 IBCIndustrial and Business Campus District The purpose of the "IBC" industrial business campus district is to provide for the establishment of limited light industrial business offices, limited light manufacturing, wholesale showrooms and related uses in an environment which provides a high level of amenities, including landscaping, preservation of natural features, architectural controls, and other features. Base Lot Area • Minimum = 8,000 sq ft. Base Lot Width • Minimum = 100 ft. Typid 1K Lot ionfitiaatioa Typi -1 1 := E_ Iz,r„ �F - s FRAUENSHUHTIP COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE A map of the properties to be modified to a different land use category, showing the address and land uses for adjacent properties. "y of Monticello So.—.,) Monticello Orderly Annexation Area (MORA) Parcels Streets +�+► Railroad Water Bodies ® Development Reserve(DR) Open Space and Resource Conservation (OSRC) City Parks and Recreation (PR) D Estate Residential (ER) Q Low -Density Residential (LDR) ® Traditional Residential (TR) 952.829.3480 + frauenshuh.com + 7101 West 78Ith Street + Minneapolis, MN 55439 Mixed Neighborhood MINI Moved -Density Residential (MDR) Manufactured Home (MH) ® Downtown Mixed-Use(DMUI Community Commercial (CC) Regional Commercial (RC) Commercial and Revilential Flex (CRF) Employment Campus (EC) Light Indusldal Park (LIP) General Industrial (GI) Pubic and Institutional (P) Xcel Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant (MNGP) CITY •�OF Monticello Applicant Name: CITY OF MONTICELLO Community Development 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1 Map or/& Text Ordinance Monticello, MN 55362 (763) 295-2711 . info&ci.monticello.mn.us Application Checklist Thomas Circle LLC Office Use Only Application Date: Application Review Date: APPLICANT APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS CITY CHECK-IN CHECK-IN VApplication A completed City of Monticello Land Use form, including full legal description of property V Completed checklist form (this document) with all required items from below Supporting title information establishing interests in the property Vownership (a title commitment and/or signature of fee title property owner) A narrative explaining the requested modification and the reason(s) why the changes are supported by the Comprehensive Plan V The legal description of all real property proposed for change (if applicable) The existing and proposed land use and zoning designations for all properties proposed to change (if applicable) A map of the property or properties to be modified to a different zoning designation, showing the addresses and zoning designations for the subject properties and the adjacent properties, if applicable; The location and text language of the proposed text to be added, amended, or deleted in this ordinance, if applicable. Electronic copies of all written narratives and plan sets required above V Submit electronic sets via flash/jump drive or.ftp only / ation fees and escrow per Land Use E ation form ZONING TDCf OR MAP Revised 11/18/2022 Base Plan Set Requirements One (1) Reduced Plan set —11" x 17" Electronic copies of all Plan sets — submit electronic sets via flash/jump drive or .ftp only *If application is incomplete, full set of revised submittals are required for re -submittal of application. Complete Application Required The review and consideration of an application submitted shall only occur if such application includes all items that are required in support of the application and is deemed complete by the Community Development Department. Application Submission Schedule Application, required information, and payment must be submitted no later than 28 days prior to the regularly -scheduled Planning Commission meeting, per the submission schedule maintained by the Community Development Department. Application submittals are due by 4 p.m. on the deadline date. INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED. Ordinance Amendment Approval Criteria Recommendations and decisions on Ordinance Amendments shall be based on consideration of the following criteria: • Whether the proposed amendment corrects an error in the original text or map; or • Whether the proposed amendment addresses needs arising from a changing condition, trend, or fact affecting the subject property and surrounding area. ® Whether the proposed amendment is consistent with achieving the goals and objectives outlined in the comprehensive plan. Planning Commission Consideration • Applicants will be notified in writing when their application is considered complete. Applicants may be asked to supply additional information beyond required list above. A public hearing will be scheduled only when it has been verified that the application is complete. • A complete application will be scheduled for an Application Review Conference between staff and the applicant, which typically occurs one week prior to the Planning Commission meeting. • Applicant will receive a final copy of staff's recommendation to the Planning Commission on the Friday preceding the meeting. • Before any amendment is adopted, the Planning Commission shall hold at least one public hearing after proper notice has been issued in accordance with Section 2.3(1) of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance. Following the hearing, the Planning Commission shall adopt findings and recommendations on the proposed amendment as soon as practical. • Planning Commission meetings are conducted at 6 p.m. on the first Tuesday of each month. City Council Consideration • After consideration of the Planning Commission recommendation and/or hearing, if applicable, the City Council may adopt the amendment or any part thereof as it deems advisable. • Approval of an amendment shall require a majority vote of all members of the City Council except for amendments which change all or part of the existing classification of a zoning district from residential to either commercial or industrial which will require the approval of four-fifths of all the members of the City Council. • Council consideration of Land Use Applications typically occurs on the 4th Monday of each month. Revised 11/18/2022 FRAUENS HUH COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE Narrative for the requested Zoning Modifications and the reasons why the changes are supported by the Comprehensive Plan. Ordinance Amendment Approval Criteria — Please find our responses in red. • Whether the pmpesed arn8Rdmen+ nnrrents an error in the nrininnl text nr mon• nr c-Propovca Rll IGT'fQTTTGTR ppffGplTGfTT'rif'I�1TT[RCp7'7s77lgiZG7R�fTliQ�r • Whether the proposed amendment addresses needs arising from a changing condition, trend, or fact affecting the subject property and surrounding area. Over time, this area has added various mixed uses within the designated zoning such as Kids Castle Daycare and Great River Soccer Club in nearby former industrial properties. The proposed zoning modification would help facilitate similar uses to further support the industrial companies and workers with childcare opportunities. We have been diligently working with the team from Tri -Valley Monticello Head Start Child & Family Program ("Tri - Valley") over the past five (5) months. Tri -Valley provides comprehensive child development services to children and families with a special emphasis on promoting children's school readiness. The program values parents and encourages them to become advocates for their children and for their community. They have been serving children in the Monticello area for over 20 years, leasing classrooms in the Eastview Education Center. Due to the growth of the Monticello School District, space has become limited for their programming, prompting them to find new space for program operations. The building in reference, 108 Thomas Circle in Monticello, fills that space need but is zoned as 1-1. Under the current zoning stipulations, this use is not allowed which is why we are seeking a rezoning to Business campus District ("IBC"). Whether the proposed amendment is consistent with achieving the goals and objectives outlined in the comprehensive plan. Goals and Objectives of Comprehensive Plan (Pg.95) 1: GROWTH AND CHANGE: A City that prioritizes growth inward by concentrating development activities within the existing city boundaries and grows or develops into the Orderly Annexation Area only when development is proposed or planned contiguous to city boundaries, sensitive open space lands are protected and thoughtfully incorporated into the development pattern, and the land is serviced by appropriate utility and transportation systems. As Monticello continues to grow, an IBC designation would provide for increased flexibility of supportive uses, like Tri - Valley, in this area. Without rezoning in this circumstance, local organizations like Tri -Valley would be forced to explore other market opportunities to support the needs of the residents in Monticello and the surrounding area. The building at 108 Thomas Circle sits in the heart of Monticello and has easy access to the surrounding roadways that connect it with the community making it an ideal candidate for this type of use; however, the current zoning of 1-1 does not permit this as currently written. If 108 Thomas Circle is rezoned as an IBC, later to become an Employment Campus (EC), it would permit daycare and childhood development centers to continue to operate and support the community. If Tri -Valley is permitted to occupy 108 Thomas Circle, they will continue their long legacy in the community to make sure no child is left behind! 2: COMPLETE NEIGHBORHOODS: A City that prioritizes growth inward by concentrating development activities within the existing city boundaries and grows or develops into the Orderly Annexation Area only when development is proposed or planned contiguous to city boundaries, sensitive open space lands are protected and thoughtfully incorporated into the development pattern, and the land is serviced by appropriate utility and transportation systems. 952.829.3480 • frauenshuh.com - 7101 West 78`h Street - Minneapolis, MN 55439 Page 2 of 2 An IBC/EC zoning allows uses, such as Tri -Valley, to further support the community and neighborhood like none other. Not only are they helping to provide for low-income families by taking the childcare away so the parent may return to the workforce, but they are engaging youth that would otherwise be left behind. By bringing the youth of lower income families up to education levels of their peers Tri -Valley is helping to ensure the playing fields are leveled out. 3: SUCCESSFUL COMMERCIAL CORRIDORS AND CENTERS: Successful, vibrant commercial centers and corridors that can adapt over time and provide a place for shopping, services, civic activities, entertainment, and arts and culture. Rezoning 108 Thomas Circle will improve the vibrancy of the area through increased economic activity accompanied by the civic benefit of educated children and access to childcare for working parents. 4: REVITALIZED MIXED-USE DOWNTOWN: A revitalized mixed-use downtown that embraces the river and serves as the heart of the community and focus of civic activity that is lively throughout the day and night consisting of a variety of dining, shopping, recreation, celebrating, gathering, and living opportunities. Not applicable for this site. 5: ACTIVE EMPLOYMENT CENTERS: Monticello as a strong and growing regional employment center including a variety of economic sectors established as the preferred location for manufacturing, technology, research, and development, and home to a diverse mix of businesses and industries. By Rezoning 108 Thomas Circle to IBC, the city of Monticello is allowing uses consistent with the area's needs for regional employment and support for employees. It also will allow for this specific use which enables the continued operation of a non-profit whose role is childcare/early education in the community for free; allowing working parents to obtain employment in the nearby industries. Without Tri -Valley's active participation within the Monticello community many families will be left without attainable childcare and thus must remain home to care for their children and removing them from the workforce. In the last 10 years alone, Tri -Valley has been able to serve 1,123 low- income children and their families in Monticello. They additionally provide job opportunities to over 35 staff each year that includes PTO Accrual, 401 K/Roth IRA Contributions, Voluntary Benefits, and extensive Holiday Pay. They also not only provide care to the community's littlest and neediest learners but work with the parents to set and achieve goals that benefit their children, family and community. 6: NATURAL ENVIRONMENT, PARKS, AND OPEN SPACE: An open space "frame" around and woven through Monticello, complemented by the Mississippi River, Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park, other local and regional parks, trails and recreation areas which together protect the City's natural resources, lakes, wetlands and woodlands, and provide opportunities for recreation, enhance visual beauty, and shape the City's character. Rezoning 108 Thomas Circle into the IBC/EC would actively encourage a greener appearance especially with a daycare occupying the facility furthered by the incorporation, of outdoor play areas and green spaces. 108 Thomas Circle sits with clear visibility to 1-94 and under its current zoning of I-1/GI the site will remain a darkened building or an industrial use. tmill FRAUENS HUH COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE See below for the legal description of all real property located at 108 Thomas Circle, Monticello MN 55362: • Sect -11 Twp -121 Range -025 THOMAS PARK Lot -005 Block -001 108 THOMAS CIR MONTICELLO MN 55362 952.829.3480 , frauenshuh.com 7101 West 781h Street Minneapolis, MN 55439 J FRAU ENS HUH COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE The existing and proposed land use and zoning designations for all properties proposed to change Current existing Land Use and Zoning Designation for 108 Thomas Circle, Monticello MN 55362 • Existing Land Use: Office • Existing Zoning: 108 Thomas Circle is currently zoned Light Industrial(I-1) as shown by the Official Zoning Map below: 952.829.3480 + frauenshuh.com + 7101 West 78th Street + Minneapolis, MN 55439 Page 2 of 3 Official breakdown of the Light Industrial District: Section 3.6 1.1 Light Industrial District The purpose of the "I-1," light industrial. district is to provide for the establishment of warehousing and light industrial development. City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 12? Page 3 of 3 Proposed Land Use and Zoning designation for 108 Thomas Circle: Proposed Land Use: Day Care Centers Proposed Zoning designation: We propose to change the future Zoning designation for 108 Thomas Circle to Indusrial and Business Campus District: Official breakdown of the Industrial and Business Campus District: Section 3.6 (C) IBCIndustrial and Business Campus District The purpose of the "IBC" industrial business campus Typical K Building Types district is to provide for the establishment of limited light industrial business offices, limited light manufacturing, wholesale showrooms and related uses s in an environment which provides a high level of «t amenities, including landscaping, preservation of natural features, architectural controls, and other features. Base Lot Area • Minimum = 8,000 sq ft. Base Lot Width • Minimum = 100 ft. Typial & Lot CanfilwA6M 1 ��l ji:�FRAUENSHUH Bugnf s and Mixed- -. R -R Use DistrKts + COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE A map of the properties to be modified to a different zoning designation, showing the address and zoning designations for the subject and adjacent properties. Legend Base Zoning Districts Residential Districts Bugnf s and Mixed- -. R -R Use DistrKts -RRU �a1 �RI E= rFn Overlay Districts � R-0 -. r�.wxnwcc ea.m Industrial Distncts O sna.�na uum•• oa[ so�vY� PUDs HaNRtXo saw z �' Nik Fleef farm � Fdriwmn 0.ttge N[0 Rm� EpYpnnR I.tlaR.a� � spwn rrowa+ai Rwt c—,.v Mtrb SarayWN MaMrClo Lm m Nfe'Eaple 4.aage 4un bent YAa t� � � � wannuao ores li RAatvwn Suva � �b bs Parl. laG NaOreb 0.V � Bbtl. 52 {Qh � CaMry OW Nana' 2nd 952.829.3480 • frauenshuh.com • 7101 West 781h Street • Minneapolis, MN 55439 IMPLEMENTATION CHART: LAND USE, GROWTH AND ORDERLY ANNEXATION SHORT- I LONG- ONGOING THEME TERM TERM MONTICELLO 2040 VISION + PLAN P011cy 5.7. Strategy5.7.1- Encourage businesses which Local Employment Opportunities Support Services support employee needs, such as access to health care, child care and education O ((( ))) and opportunities. Develop opportunities, such as business incubators, for locally owned business whenever possible. Strategy 5.7.2- Allow a small range of non -industrial commercial uses that provide Provide small business support necessary services for workers in industrial or services, business development employment designated areas. Appropriate workshops and other tools to non -industrial uses may include restaurants, encourage Monticello residents to small retail or service area, ATMs, gas stations O establish new business enterprises and similar uses serving the local workforce. Such uses should be clustered in centers In the community. within industrial areas rather than dispersed in numerous locations. Policy 5.8. Xcel Energy Strategy5.8.1- Continue discussions and planning in conjunction with Xcel Energy Continue to support Xcel Energy regarding the location and development of the O and recognize its facility as a unique northwest interchange. use in the City. Buffer their lands from outside development and Strategy 5.8.2- Begin conversations regarding include them in the review of any the company's long-term land use plans O O proposed land use changes in the after decommissioning. vicinity of their facility, and the in the development of an interchange at Strategy5.8.3- Partner with Xcel Energy to Orchard Road. leverage resources for economic development O opportunity and legislative support for transition tools. Strategy 5.8.4- Sustain partnerships with other utility to collectively address the impacts and opportunities associated with hosting large- scale utilities. This includes a continued effort to manage major shifts in property tax for utility facilities. MONTICELLO 2040 VISION + PLAN P.O. Box 3185 center for rural policy Mankato, MN 56002-3185 (507)934-7700 and development riruralmn.org www.ruralmn.org Child care in rural Minnesota after 2020: A unique opportunity February 2021 By Marnie Werner, Director of Research A unique opportunity? After a year of COVID, spiking unemployment, closed schools, and restricted businesses, rural Minnesotans may be looking at a unique opportunity in economic development. Since the Great Recession, rural employers have been dealing with an ever-growing job vacancy rate, which we discussed in our recent report, "The pandemic paints a different employment picture in Greater Minnesota." Now, at the beginning of 2021, we've been presented with a new and rare opportunity: we also have a larger -than -usual pool of unemployed workers. We now have the chance to match workers without job to jobs that need workers. But a few things stand in the way of taking full advantage of this opportunity. The first issue we addressed in last month's report. Most of Minnesota's unemployed workers' skills don't match up with the skills rural employers currently need in health care services and our growing manufacturing sector. Many of the needed skills require training, and therefore, we need to make sure our retraining programs are ready for the challenge. Matching the right people with the right training programs to get them into good jobs would be a boon to young families looking to move to a community for the rural lifestyle. The other piece, though, is much tougher to fix, and that piece is child care. The one thing holding rural Minnesota back from taking a serious leap forward economically is the lack of workers, and there are three things getting in the way of fixing that: a lack of child care, a lack of affordable housing, and a lack of transportation. The biggest of these is child care. The trends Last year finally brought into sharp focus just how important child care is to maintaining a functioning economy. As we noted in our original report on child care, "A Quiet Crisis," in nearly 80% of Minnesota families, all parents work, and child care issues are the primary cause © Center for Rural Policy & Development CKcenter for rural policy and development ruralmn.org of absenteeism among American workers. Child care is indeed the infrastructure that keeps America working, and COVID-19 and 2020 made this painfully clear. Licensed child care comes in two forms: center -based child care (CCC) and family, or in-home, child care (FCC). Because of economies of scale, family child care is far more prevalent in areas of sparse population, while child care centers are much more common in urban and suburban areas. In Minnesota, both types were growing fairly steadily until 2000. Around that time, something happened. The number of licensed centers kept growing, albeit modestly, particularly in urban areas, but the number of licensed family care providers started to plummet (Figure 1 & Table 1). 60% 30% 0% -30% Change in provider licenses and capacity, 2000 - 2019 2005 2010 2015 2020 CCC Capacity CCC Licenses FCC Capacity — FCC Licenses Figure 1: Change in CCC and FCC providers, year-end, 2000-2020. 2 © Center for Rural Policy & Development enter for rural policy 1r((1 nd development uralmn. org Table 1: Change in center and family licenses statewide, 2000-2020. Data source: MN Dept. of Human Services Child Care Type Change in Change in licenses capacity Family child care -50% -47% Center child care 8% 6% In the Twin Cities, growth in center capacity between 2000 and 2019 was almost able to make up for the loss in family -based child care. The metro area ended 2019 with a net of -1,462 spaces (FCC and CCC capacity combined). 2020 set things back further with a net loss of an additional 1,200 spaces. In Greater Minnesota, the net loss of child care capacity was much larger: more than 20,000 space were lost, even though population in most Greater Minnesota counties grew during that time. 2020 was barely a blip in the downward trend in child care capacity (Table 2). 3 © Center for Rural Policy & Development center for rural policy Ir(I nd development uralmn. org Table 2: Net change in child care capacity, 2000-2020. Data source: MN Dept. of Human Services Greater MN Net change Family child care 90,686 55,231 -35,455 Center child care 25,730 40,933 15,203 Twin Q+ioc morn N Family child care 68,845 29,120 -39,725 Center child care 60,779 97,816 37,037 Total Greater MN 116,416 96,164 -20,252 capacity Total Twin Cities capacity 129,624 126,936 -2,688 The loss in family child care is particularly troubling for rural areas. The sparse populations that characterize rural places make it more difficult to open child care centers, which usually require more children to achieve the level of revenue needed to pay for the higher startup and ongoing operating costs of a center. Family providers, who care for children in their homes, don't require the building or the staff that centers do and therefore can operate financially with fewer children. For this reason, family child care has been the foundation of child care in rural Minnesota much more so than centers. While centers have been growing, family child care capacity has been falling faster. While center capacity increased as a share of overall capacity in Greater Minnesota, the number of centers actually fell, from 692 in 2000 to 625 in 2012, back up to 674 in 2019, then back down to 654 at the end of 2020. What this trend overall implies is that on average each center is getting bigger, but we are not necessarily getting more of them. Child care centers in the seven -county metro area are getting bigger on average as well, but while their numbers also dropped for a while between 2000 and 2010, they started increasing again, peaking at 1,104 in 2019, only to drop back to 1,072 in 2020. 4 © Center for Rural Policy & Development 4 center for rural policy and development ruralmn.org In Greater Minnesota, larger but fewer centers means that child care is concentrating in areas that can support them, larger towns and cities with an ample pool of families. That doesn't help families that live outside those centers' range. Adding capacity in Mankato doesn't help a family fifty miles away in rural Mountain Lake unless one of the parents works in or near Mankato. This is the reason we hear so many firsthand experiences of parents driving their child 30 miles to a provider, then 20 miles back in to get to work. Regional loss In 2016, we presented a graphic showing the shortfall in child care capacity for each region of the state. Figure 2 shows that graphic and an updated version. In four of the seven regions, the child care shortage and the amount the region would need to grow its child care capacity stayed fairly steady, not much better and not much worse. In three regions, however—Central, West Central and Northwest, the shortfall truly intensified. Table 3 also illustrates the trend by region between 2000 and 2020. In the Twin Cities area, capacity grew, but so did the region's population of under -6 children. In the West Central region, the estimated number of children needing child care also grew, by more than 1,100, but child care capacity dropped by over 500 spaces. As of 12/31/15 As of 12/31/20 Northeast 54% Northeast 55% 2,538 3,414 7,201 6,087 Northwestern 35% 4,956 Northwestern 56% 4,787 9,139 8,656 1,963 3,628 9,758 9,197 14,055 Central 48% 15,393 Central 56% West Central 20% West Central 39% 29,496 27,534 44,476 50,997 3,016 122,007 3,134 126,936 12,646 Twin Cities 36% 11,845 Twin Cities 40% Southwestern 24% 8,691 Southwestern 27% 7,912 33,819 32,845 Southern 26% Southern 24% Figure 2: Child care capacity, shortfall, and the amount needed to grow capacity to make up for that shortfall, by Minnesota Initiative Foundation region, 2015 and 2020. Licensed child care capacity versus the estimated number of children under 6 with both or al 5 © Center for Rural Policy & Development center for rural policy nd development uralmn. org Table 3: Net change in center and family child care capacity by region, 2000-2020 Wr Change in center Change in family Change in MIF Region capacity child care capacity combined capacity is East Central 60% -35% -13% Northeast 37% -54% -27% Northwest -3% -36% -30% Southern 104% -41% -10% Southwest 34% -40% -25% West Central 16% -32% -22% Twin Cities 61% -58% -2% What happened in 2020? 2020 was a particularly rough year for child care (see Table 4). As businesses and schools shut down, everything suddenly moved to the home. Child care providers found themselves adapting quickly to new rules that would allow them to stay open to care for the children of essential workers, even while they faced a substantial loss in revenue. Table 4: Net change in center and family licenses and capacity between year-end 2019 and year-end 2020. Center child Family child Center child Family child care licenses care licenses care capacity care capacity East Central -6 -61 115 -788 Northeast -7 -29 -141 -345 Northwest 2 -30 117 -363 Southern -3 -62 464 -777 6 0 Center for Rural Policy & Development center for rural policy Ir', nd development uralmn. org Center child 'W Family child Center child Family child care licenses care licenses care capacity care capacity Southwest -5 -27 89 -252 West Central -1 2 144 -54 Twin Cities -32 -138 287 -1,513 Tota 1 -52 -345 1,075 -4,092 Parents kept their children home from child care for a number of reasons: the parent(s) lost their jobs and couldn't afford child care anymore; they were working from home and decided to save on child care costs by keeping the kids home, too; they feared they or their children would be infected; or their child was sick or quarantined due to exposure to COVID and had to stay home. Often, though, the reason their children stayed home was because their child care was no longer available. And COVID added a new quirk to the problem. In normal times, a family that couldn't access child care would often call on friends or family for help. In the pandemic, though, families have become reluctant to ask the grandparents for help because of a fear of infecting them, thus closing off that avenue as well. For child care centers, restrictions on the number of people per room—group limits—had the potential for the largest impact (see Figure 4). Under normal circumstances, state child care quotas limit the number of children per adult in a child care facility, with different numbers for different age groups. For example, the quota for the preschool age group is ten children per adult. Therefore, a typical classroom might have twenty preschoolers and two teachers, a lead teacher and an assistant teacher. Mandating a 10 -persons -per -room limit would have wreaked havoc on centers' revenue and staffing and was therefore strongly recommended but not required by state health officials. Using the preschool classroom above, restricting the number of people in a room to ten would mean the classroom the classroom could have only nine children and one teacher, the lead teacher. If the center has an extra room, another lead teacher (not the assistant teacher) could take another nine children. But that would still leave two children without a classroom and the assistant teacher without a role. If the center didn't have the extra room, the leftover children would be out of luck and have to stay home.' © Center for Rural Policy & Development center for rural policy ir(, nd development uralmn. org Group limits COVID group limit: 10 people per room Classroom loses 11 students and assistant teacher Normal center preschool classroom: 20 children 1 lead teacher 1 assistant teacher C� 0000 QPW 0000 Figure 3: Group limits and their impact on centers. For family providers, group limits weren't as much of an issue since they generally care for fewer than ten children at any one time. They faced other issues, however: children kept home were a big issue, but school closures also created difficulties. Providers were asked to look after school-age children who would normally be in school, and providers often felt obligated to help them with their online classes. School-age children also brought with them higher expenses in food and other supplies needed for this different age group. Anticipating the impact on child care revenue, the state issued emergency child care grants in three rounds to center and family providers using federal CARES Act funds. The Minnesota Initiative Foundations also created a fund and awarded grants. These grants didn't save every provider, but they seem to have limited the damage in Minnesota considerably compared to other states. 8 © Center for Rural Policy & Development o 0 001000 �W J 0 J 0 0 0 0 0000 9k -UN 0000 qkYWN 0000 %VP COVID group limit: 10 people per room Classroom loses 11 students and assistant teacher Normal center preschool classroom: 20 children 1 lead teacher 1 assistant teacher C� 0000 QPW 0000 Figure 3: Group limits and their impact on centers. For family providers, group limits weren't as much of an issue since they generally care for fewer than ten children at any one time. They faced other issues, however: children kept home were a big issue, but school closures also created difficulties. Providers were asked to look after school-age children who would normally be in school, and providers often felt obligated to help them with their online classes. School-age children also brought with them higher expenses in food and other supplies needed for this different age group. Anticipating the impact on child care revenue, the state issued emergency child care grants in three rounds to center and family providers using federal CARES Act funds. The Minnesota Initiative Foundations also created a fund and awarded grants. These grants didn't save every provider, but they seem to have limited the damage in Minnesota considerably compared to other states. 8 © Center for Rural Policy & Development enter for rural policy 1r((1 nd development uralmn. org Moving on from 2020: Quick fixes for 2021 to keep child care intact The tribulations of 2020 aren't over for child care providers. As more people are vaccinated and once unemployment benefits end, there will be a rush of people wanting to get back to work and back to workplaces, but the child care shortage will still be with us. We may also have to deal with intermittent waves of COVID infections as new variants roll through, requiring some restrictions again, albeit on a smaller scale. And Greater Minnesota still sits with thousands of open jobs and shrinking child care capacity. Around the state, thousands of workers will be looking for new and maybe even better jobs than they had before, hopefully in Greater Minnesota. Will the child care providers who closed in 2020 reopen? What will incentivize new providers to step up? Greater Minnesota will need a robust workforce development system to match people with jobs and a robust child care network to make it possible for workers and their families to take the jobs of their choice and live in the community of their choice without the stress of wondering what they will do for child care. So what do we do next? First, we make sure our current child care system stays intact. The emergency child care grants awarded by the state and the Initiative Foundations during 2020 have been a lifeline for providers, said Lynn Haglin, vice president and KIDS PLUS director at the Northland Foundation in Duluth, one of the six Minnesota Initiative Foundations. With very little margin for error, both family and center -based providers needed the monthly infusion of cash to be able to keep the doors open to care for the children of essential workers. Until group limits are lifted and providers can operate at normal enrollments again, continuing these grants will be crucial. Currently the state is counting on another round of COVID emergency money from the federal government to provide dollars for future emergency grants after the current round of grants run out. If those federal funds don't materialize, a priority will be to find funds to keep as many providers as possible in business. The private sector can help. While many businesses around the state are struggling to stay afloat, others are doing well. One suggestion would be for them to form a special child care philanthropy fund, perhaps working with the Initiative Foundations or other community foundations around the state to help disburse grants to child care providers. Also, once restrictions are lifted and unemployment benefits end, there will be a need to match workers with jobs. As our workforce report pointed out, many of those workers may want to explore the vacant jobs waiting for them in Greater Minnesota. Those workers, however, probably don't have the skills needed for those jobs. The state already has a robust system of 9 © Center for Rural Policy & Development enter for rural policy 1r((1 nd development uralmn. org workforce development and training programs around the state that will play a big role in making these matches work. However, workers with families may need help paying for child care while they participate in retraining and other education programs. Programs like the Minnesota Family Investment Program provide subsidies to very low-income families to pay for child care while the parent is retraining. However, the scope of the MFIP subsidy and that of the other CCAP programs may need to be expanded to avoid income cliffs. If a family's income excludes them from using MFIP or the Basic Sliding Fee child care program but they still can't afford child care or can't find it, it could be a major deterrent for them. Usually, a family is tapered off child care subsidies as their income increases, until at some point they are earning enough to not qualify for subsidies at all. However, their income may still not be high enough to afford child care in their area. At that point, they are out of luck and so are the businesses that may have hired these workers. Here is another opportunity for not just the state, but local businesses and even communities to sponsor potential workers by supporting their retraining and the move to their new community by helping them find and pay for child care. Beyond 2020: How do we fix child care for the long term? As we get through 2021 and 2022 and things get back to normal, what then? Is "normal" where child care is concerned where we want to be? Here again we have another opportunity staring us in the face: the opportunity to fix child care altogether. That may sound outrageous—after all, the solution to our child care crisis has eluded not just policy makers in Minnesota but all over the United States. But historically, times of great upheaval can turn out to be times of great opportunity for those who are prepared and looking out for it. After the pandemic, we'll be focusing on fixing our economy, and child care will have to be a part of that. But it can't be an afterthought. Bringing it back to 2019 levels of providers is still far below 2000 levels and below what would be deemed adequate. To fix child care and not just continue to patch it, we may need something akin to a Marshall Plan, which will require concentrated focus, a lot of money, and a great deal of will and commitment to get it done. Right now, we have some breathing space before people need to find jobs and get back to work. Now is a good time to work on the beginnings of a permanent solution instead of once again reaching for the band-aids. Here are some places we recommend starting. 10 © Center for Rural Policy & Development enter for rural policy 1r((1 nd development uralmn. org 1. Decide what child care is. Is it a business? Is it a school? Can it be both? Can it be one or the other? Is child care a highly regulated private business or an underfunded public school? One or the other—or variations in between—might work better for some communities than others, but whatever it is, we need to decide, even if that's deciding to let communities decide. Providers live with a great deal of ambiguity that adds stress to an already stressful job. 2. Continue to monitor child care policy for usefulness and unintended side effects. Our survey of providers taken in 2018 recorded numerous examples of regulations that, though they were well intended, ended up adding levels of hassle to already -stressed providers. In 2019, the Minnesota Legislature passed policy that addressed many of the hassle factors. From making it legal for providers to allow their kids to reuse their own reusable water bottles and sippy cups to determining that a family child care provider's own children who live in the same home with her don't need to have background checks except under very specific circumstances, the responsiveness of the Legislature is to be commended. The changes went a long way in addressing many policies that may have seemed inconsequential to someone not in child care but were adding to both center and family providers' stress. Once the Legislature can move on to non- emergency policies, we recommend regularly monitoring existing policy and screening proposed policy from the perspective of the provider, the child and their family, all while maintaining safety. Click here for a more extensive summary of policy changes made in 2019 and 2020. 3. Remember family providers. Family providers are the backbone of child care in Greater Minnesota, and yet we have half the number today that we had in 2000, leaving most rural regions child care deserts, even though Greater Minnesota's population has increased. Until it becomes more affordable and feasible to start centers in areas of sparse population, family providers will continue to be needed. Another creation of the 2019 legislative session was the Family Child Care Task Force, a legislative task force made up of child care experts, state officials, child care providers and parents. Their task was to discuss the many identified problems contributing to the decrease in family child care numbers and to figure out some solutions. Despite being interrupted by COVID, the FCCTF met on a regular basis and just recently turned in their final report— on time. 4. Don't allow reimbursement rates to stagnate again. The "reimbursement rate" refers to Child Care Assistance Program subsidies that help low-income families pay for child care. Instead of going directly to the family, this subsidy is paid directly to the provider on behalf of the family. It is an important source of revenue, especially in child care deserts, where families tend to be lower income. Since 2003, providers who depend on child care reimbursement rates have had a rocky path. That year, rates were frozen 11 © Center for Rural Policy & Development center for rural policy and development ruralmn.org through 2005 while the Office of the Legislative Auditor investigated suspect practices by state agencies in disbursing CCAP payments. Rates were unfrozen in 2005 and raised slightly in 2006, but then they were reduced by 2.5% in 2011. In 2014, rates were raised back to their 2006 level with a slight increase for some counties. Finally, in 2020, reimbursement rates were given a substantial boost. But rates stayed essentially the same or decreased for providers for 14 years between 2006 and 2020. The legislation also allocated funds for fiscal years 2021, 2022 and 2023. 5. Child care desert premium. Right now, it's difficult to determine the impact the new higher reimbursement rates might be having since the pandemic has been keeping revenue artificially low for many providers. Once things return to normal, though, the new higher rates may still not be enough for providers in child care deserts to survive. To help with the dysfunctional markets that create child care deserts in rural communities and urban neighborhoods, we propose exploring the idea of adding a child care desert premium or differential to the current reimbursement rate, similar to and on top of the premium a provider receives for Parent Aware Star ratings. It would be an additional boost for providers in those areas where child care facilities have particular difficulty developing naturally, and it would not only help existing providers stay in business, it could incentivize new providers to enter the business. 6. Involve all stakeholders in community discussions, especially private -sector businesses. Child care shortages will often need to be solved at the community level, with all stakeholders coming together to discuss the issue and look for solutions. Rarely has one sector been able to solve the problem itself. Employers especially need to be involved. Employers have high stakes in the child care infrastructure. The number of stories are rising of employers who have finally found someone to fill an important, long -vacant position at their company only to have the family leave because they couldn't find child care locally. Child care, along with housing and transportation, are the three biggest barriers to finding workers right now, says Vicki Leaderbrand of the Rural Minnesota Concentrated Employment Program in Detroit Lakes. RMCEP provides services to help match employers with potential employees through retraining, career counseling and other programs. Without child care, workers are cut off from what could be a new career. It also cuts off Greater Minnesota employers, from manufacturers to colleges to clinics and hospitals, from the people they need to grow their businesses. Despite how important child care is to employees, though, employers in general have been slow to step in and get involved with finding solutions. Some of Minnesota's largest companies do help with child care. Taylor Corporation, a major employer in south central Minnesota, has been providing deeply subsidized child care as a benefit to its employees for forty years. The center's staff are Taylor Corporation employees. Harmony Industries in Harmony, MN, built it's own daycare center in 2016, as did 12 © Center for Rural Policy & Development enter for rural policy 1r((1 nd development uralmn. org Gardonville Telecom in Brandon, MN, in 2014. Not every business can afford to open its own center, especially smaller companies, but there are other ways employers can contribute to creating a stable environment for child care providers: "reserving" slots with a local provider, contributing funds or space or other resources to a community project, or providing a child care allowance to employees. 7. Allow for creativity. In an effort to keep children safe and increase learning standards, sometimes policy can become too rigid, as we saw in policy issues that were addressed in 2019. In a situation where regular market forces don't work, however, businesses need to be able to think creatively to come up with ideas that solve problems. For example, child care in or connected to schools and senior living facilities are serving infants to preschoolers by helping reduce expensive overhead, allowing the provider to spend more on staff wages. In some models where the school becomes the child care provider, the child care staffers are also employees of the school district and are eligible for health benefits, a rare thing in child care, while in other models, they are not employees but may still have access to benefits. 8. Allow for flexibility. The pod model is a new type of license for family child care providers that allows multiple providers to operate in one building without operating as a center. Providers run their programs separately, but they share the overhead costs that can make opening and operating a center prohibitively expensive in rural areas. This model could be more attractive to potential providers who don't want to start a center but also don't want to operate their child care business in their homes. This kind of flexibility in policy makes innovation possible, and that leads to solutions. 9. Allow for experimentation. One of the most exciting developments in child care is the partnership that has developed between eight north central Minnesota counties and Sourcewell, a regional service cooperative located in Staples. The idea came out of routine meeting of county social service directors discussing whether they could combine their resources in some way to provide better county licensing services. Most of the five counties in Sourcewell's region could devote only part of a full-time position to county licensing, whose primary role is to help family child care providers become licensed and to conduct inspections. They eventually approached Sourcewell to see if their service coop could help somehow. Regional service coops have been offering bulk purchasing and technical support to school districts and counties throughout Minnesota for decades. Working together with the Minnesota Department of Human Services, the counties and Sourcewell eventually developed a formal partnership. Sourcewell now provides the licensing and inspections, coaching services, and even an annual conference for family providers. The partnership has expanded from the original five counties in Sourcewell's region to include three more counties. While the counties are 13 © Center for Rural Policy & Development enter for rural policy 1r((1 nd development uralmn. org still responsible for the enforcement of any infractions, Sourcewell is able to provide the full attention county licensing requires. Is it time? Child care is no longer a luxury. It is an economic development tool and an indispensable part of our economic infrastructure, especially in Greater Minnesota. We are at a point where with focus, motivation and will, we could have real impact on our child care crisis. ' Grunewald, Rob, "How a COVID-19 10 -person group limit affects Minnesota's child care providers," Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, June 24, 2020. 14 © Center for Rural Policy & Development Planning Commission Agenda — 03/07/23 3A. Community Development Director's Report Council Action on/related to Commission Recommendations Consideration to approve an Amendment to the Monticello Zoning Ordinance Related to Vehicle Fuel Sales as a Principal and Accessory Use, Electric Vehicle Charging Stations, Vehicle Fuel Sales including Electric Vehicle Charging Stations as an Accessory Use, Definitions relating to Vehicle Fuel Sales Uses, including Electric Vehicle Charging Stations, and other related language. Applicant: City of Monticello Approved as part of the consent agenda of City Council on February 13, 2023, following removal for addition of definition of fuel pumps and clarifications. Consideration to approve Ordinance No. 799 and Summary Ordinance No. 799A for Amendments to the Monticello City Code XV, Chapter 153, Monticello Zoning Ordinance, Various Sections. Applicant: City of Monticello Approved as part of the consent agenda of City Council on February 27, 2023, following removal for discussion and clarification. Personnel Update — Development Services Team The Building Department is pleased to announce that inspector Bob Ferguson has been promoted to the position of Building Official/Fire Inspector. In addition to continuing his work with the department on building plan review and inspection, Bob will be taking on the responsibility of continuing the City's fire inspection program. The fire inspection program was initiated to maintain fire safety and code compliance within the community. In addition to this internal promotion, the Department of Building Safety & Code Enforcement will be working toward the addition of a third Building Inspector in the near future. City Improvement and Other Projects Planning Commission members can find out more about City public improvement projects and other major community -wide project initiatives on the following page of the City website: Protects I Monticello, MN Or, just click on the green circle labeled "Projects" on the home page. Communications and staff team will be working to add more information on this page. Project Update List March's updated project listing will be posted on March 7t", 2023 as an addition to the agenda packet. Deephaven Apartments Residential 1255 Edmonson Ave NE 3 apartment buildings totalling 165 units 1/30/2020 Completed Take 5 Car Wash Commercial 4008 Deegan Court New construction car wash (4,146 sq ft) 9/27/2021 Under Construction/Awaiting Equipment Monticello Lakes Apartments Residential Southeast area of The Pointes at Cedar 2 100 unit multi -family apartments 12/13/2021 Yet to Break Ground Runnings Expansion Commercial 300 7th St W Expansion of current facility (13,962 sq ft) 12/13/2021 Completed Twin Pines Apartments Residential South Side of School Blvd. East of Wal-Mart 96 multi -family unit apartment building 2/28/2022 Yet to Break Ground Block 52 Redevelopment Mixed -Use NE Corner of Highway 25 and Broadway St 87 multi -family units with rougly 30,000 sq ft of 1st floor commercial 9/30/2022 Demo Completed/Under Construction Featherstone 6th Addition Residential North of 85th St NE and West of Highway 25 21 Single-family lots with commercially guided outlots for future development 8/24/2022 Under Construction Tesla Stations at Cub Foods Commercial 206 7th St W Installation of 8 charging ports in the Cub Foods parking lot 7/12/2022 Completed Taco Bell Remodel Commercial 124 7th St E Remodel of existing building and expansion of 724 sq ft 9/30/2022 Completed Haven Ridge 2nd Addition Residential South of Farmstead Ave and West of Fallon Ave NE 59 Single -Family Lot Development 10/26/2022 Yet to Break Ground Headwaters West Development Residential Along South side of 7th St W between Elm St and Golf Course Rd 102 apartment unit & 60 townhome Senior 55+ Development 9/26/2022 Townhomes Under Construction Sunny Days Therapy Commercial Along South side of 7th St E West of Old McDonald's Location Development of an Occupational Child Therapy Facility 8/22/2022 Under Construction Camping World Commercial 3801 Chelsea Rd W Installation of an attached paint booth (1,100 sq ft) 8/22/2022 Yet to Break Ground Electro Industries Expansion Commercial 2150 River St W Expansion of current facility (4,300 sq ft) 9/26/2022 Yet to Break Ground Wiha Tools USA Industrial Along South Side of 7th St E across from Wright St and Ramsey St New construction light manufacturing (72,540 sq ft) 11/28/2022 Yet to Break Ground Kwik Trip #345 Commercial 9440 State Highway 25 Expansion of current facility (520 sq ft) 1/23/2023 Under Construction Scooter's Coffee Commercial 100 7th St W. New Construction of Drive -Through Coffee Shop 1/23/2023 Yet to Break Ground From: Haley Foster To: Angela Schumann; Jim Thares Subject: IMCP Council Connection info Date: Monday, February 6, 2023 1:26:00 PM Attachments: MMA Slides. Updated2.ing Here's the recap I provided to council in the Council Connection —Angela, I know you had some questions about what it entails, hopefully this breaks it down a bit further. Feel free to share with the IEDC/EDA/Planning Commission as well, and I'm available if you need help with any questions from our committees. Preparing for Launch: The 2023 Integrated Marketing and Communications Plan As part of the 2022 Community Economic Transition (CET) Grant, we budgeted for an integrated marketing and communications plan. The purpose is to create a plan that will assist in achieving Monticello's economic development goals. With the help of the EDA, local businesses, and area youth we were able to identify these priorities for the campaign. 1. Employee Recruitment & Retention 2. Executive Leadership Positions Recruitment 3. Manufacturer Retention, Recruitment, and Attraction 4. Redevelopment & Revitalization 5. Relationship Building We will be launching a 6 -month campaign at the end of March/beginning of April. We used CET funds to pre -purchase the following advertising, and the campaign goals they align with: $5,850 for for pre -pay advertising in the states of MN, SD, and ND — they offer digital ads (banner ads, like the one shown here, that will display on various websites) and geotargeting ads (targeting people in specific area based on their location and interests, primarily displayed on cell phones). We will be targeting several Manufacturer and Entrepreneur specific events and meetings with the geofence. (Goals 1, 2, 3) $2,150 for )iamond Sponsor Packaae with Midwest Manufacturers (MMA), (Goals 3, 4, 5). This promotes to ALL affiliates - MMA, CMMA, & TSMA - and includes: • Home Page Slider Ad • Enhanced Membership Listing Newsletter Ads 1 Dedicated E -blast to Memberships • 1 Dedicated Post on Facebook, Instagram, and Linkedln $2,000 for the Manufacturers Alliance Custom Bundle (Goals 3, 4, 5) • 3 webinar ads - example below (Slide in the webinars and the host reads a provided script from sponsor, tag in Social Media post. Typical webinar hosts 50-100 virtual attendees). 0 2 podcast ads (Host to read provided script from the sponsor at beginning of each podcast, tag in Social Media post. Average 4,700+ listeners each month). 1 bonus podcast guest episode (Be a guest on one podcast episode. Includes a Podcast topic planning meeting). Jim, Angela, & Haley will be on the podcase in June 2023. A podcast planning session will be in May. 1 service company membership (One year of company membership for the calendar year of 2023). Memberships also give us access to the MFRALL Directory for potential contacts. Haley Foster Communications & Marketing Specialist City of Monticello 763-271-3202 www.ci.monticello.mn.us Email correspondence to and from the City of Monticello government offices is subject to the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act and may be disclosed to third parties,