HRA Agenda 11-06-2002
.
.
.
AGFNDA
MONTICELLO HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Wednesday, Novemher 6, 2002 - 6:00 p.m.
505 Walnut Street - Bridge Room
Comm issioners:
Chair Brad Barger, Vice Chair Steve Andrcws, Darrin Lahr, Dan Frie, and Bill
Fair.
Council Liaison:
Brian Stumpf.
Stafr Rick Wolfstellcr, Ollie Koropchak, and Lori Kracmer.
1. Call to Order.
2. Considcration to approve the October 2,2002 HRA minutcs.
3. Considcration of adding or rcmoving items from the agenda.
4.
Conscnt Agenda.
A. Considcration to approvc changcs to the Contract for Private Development by and
among the City, the I-IRA, and thc Central Minnesota Single Family Housing, LLC.
L:onsi~a~~l~pQ,(o~\a~nding the TIF District No. 1-22 expenditurc for thc
sldewal\.l'pWl\h\i'l\kh~u\l:Q1 Frcsh.
Consideration to approve changing thc date of the regu lar mecting of the II RA from
January l, 2003, to January 8,2003.
B.
c.
5.
Consideration to approve assignment of the Contract for Private Development between the HR^
and T. J. Martin, Inc. frotH T. J. Martin, Inc. to WHL Entcrprises, Inc. and to amend certain
conditions within the Contract.
6. Continucd _ Consideration to hear an update on thc progrcss for redevclopment of a portion of
Block 52.
7. Considcration to endorse the formation of a suhcomm ittee to complete the Business Park
Development 10 1 Exercise and to appoint a representative.
8. Consideration ofrequcst from IDC to re-instatc the usc of the liRA committed funds for
purchase of land for future industrial developmcnt.
9. Considcration to authorize paymcnt of HRA bills.
lO. Consideration of Executivc Director's Report.
11. Committec Reports.
12. Othcr Busincss.
13.
Adjournment.
.
.
.
MINUTES
MONTICELLO HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Wednesday, October 2,2002 - 6:00 p.m.
505 W~llnut Street - Bridge Room
Commissioners:
Chair Brad Barger. Vice Chair Steve Andrews, Darrin Lahr, Dan Frie,
Bill Fair and Council Liaison Brian Stumpf.
Rick Wolfsteller
Ollie Koropchak and Lori Kraemer
Absent:
Staff:
1. Call to Order.
Chair Barger called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.
2. Consideration to approve the September 4. 2002. HRA minutes.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY STEVE ANDREWS TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF
TI-IE SEPTEMBER 4.2002, REGULAR BRA MEETING. DARRIN LAHR
SECONDED T1IE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
...,
.).
Consideration of addinl! or removinl! items from the aQ.enda.
Koropchak added that the City had received a letter from DTED stating the grant had
been awarded to the City for Ultra Machine Company.
4. Consent ^\!enda.
A. Consideration to authorize execution of a Ouick Claim Deed from the HRA to the
City for the property described as Lots 1 ~5" Block 64, City of Monticello.
Recommendation: To approve authorization of execution of a Quick Claim Deed
from the HRA to the City for the property descrihed as Lots 1-5, Block 64, City-of
Monticello.
Steve Andrews asked Koropchak if this property becomes park land would they be
unahle to do anything else with it at another time and Koropchak advised they could not.
There was no further discussion.
A tvlOTION WAS MADI': BY STEVE ANDREWS TO APPROVE THE CONSENT
AGENDA AS WRITTEN. DARRIN LAHR SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION
CARRIED UNANIMOL'SL Y.
5.
Continued _ Consideratil)Il to hear an update on the prol!ress for redevelopment of a
portion or Block 52.
.
.
.
HRA Minutes - 10/02/02
Koropchak advised that Steve Johnson had contacted her stating he was not ready to
come back to the HRA at this time, but will be here in November. She also stated that
shc had heard that Heaton was having second thoughts on participating which would
change the project. Koropchak will call Heaton to confirm. She also advised Johnson
that construction would need to start in March of 2003.
Koropchak provided parking information regarding number of stalls available, as well as
a comparison of the dollar amount the HRA had given to the Amoco project, stating if
she used TIF cashflow of $185,000 and the price per square foot of $12.85, that would
mean up to $695,000 NPV. which is a little more than what Mark RufThad stated
previously. She suggested going with the $450,000 NPV pay as you go, along with
giving them the HRA lot. She also compared the offsitc parking using an average east
for the Amoco site of $1,750, and using the same scenario for this project it would
amount to $280,000 NPV for parking, assuming the project is the same as what was
initially presented.
There was further discussion on number of parking stalls and if all lots were eounted,
whieh Koropchak stated that all lots were not eounted in the feasibility analysis.
6.
Consideration to discuss local Fair HOllsine. issucs.
Koropchak advised the I-IRA that the reason they were asked to diseuss the local fair
housing issues was due to a grant reeeived for Twin City Die Castings. She explained
that becausc the dollars the City reccived was from the State, there is a great deal more
monitoring required of the State and the City. She added that the time frame was
extended for TCDC as they had not yet ereated their 85 jobs. Koropehak advised that
DTED only accepted 40 of the jobs created, as 20 were full time temporary jobs and the
grant calls for full time pennancnt jobs.
According to the grant agreement the BRA must continue to hold public meetings to
discuss local t~lir housing issues in the eommunity. Koropchak defined the civil rights
acts as it prohibits discrimination. Brian Stumpf asked about any deficiencies and
Koropchak stated she was not aware of any. and the HRA' s job is to make sure that the
City is aware of the need to follow the act. She also added that the fair housing aet's plan
of action includecl the HRA conducting the mcetings as requested per the agreement.
Under the population characteristics using the 1990 census, Koropchak stated that
minority population was approximately 1 % ancl the breakdown for household
characteristics was 56% owners. 44 % renters. Using the 2000 eensus, the minority
population had incrcased to 3% and 72% of total households are owners, 28% renters
which shows home ownership \vent up. Koropchak also went over the populations for
over 65, female hcad of households. commuting time, median income and poverty status.
Regarding rent. the greatest percentage was between $500 and $700.
2
H RA Minutes - 10/02/02
.
Koropchak also providcd information regarding DTED guidelines for businesses
receiving revolving loan funds including the pay scale criteria and the median income
levels for TIF housing districts. Barger asked what happens ifTCDC doesn't meet the 85
job creation requirement and Koropchak stated if they create 60 jobs they would have to
make up the difference in payment. More critical is the federal guidelines stating 51%
must be for low to moderate income persons. If they do not meet the 51 %, they would
have to pay the entire amount back. Koropchak felt it was discouraging to the City as
they would like to see higher paying jobs in Monticello. Andrews asked if it was the City
that would have to pay back the monies. Koropchak also noted that if the company did
not meet the requirement for jobs they still have the company located in Monticello.
Koropchak provided a copy of the building codes in regard to handicap requirements, as
well as a portion of the comprehensive plan. The City should monitor housing
development to provide a full range of housing. Also regarding the Affirmative Action
Plan. it was noted that the cities receiving federal funding need to work directly with the
Federal Agency from which funding is received to determine ifan affirmative action plan
is rcquircd. Koropchak briefly touched on thc fair housing issues in greater Minnesota,
noting the necd for employers to be consistent in participation with housing developments.
.
Koropchak stated that a summary of the information would be provided to the City
Council and Planning Commission to keep them aware of the tail' housing act.
7.
Consideration to authorize payment of HRA bills.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY BILL FAIR TO AUTHORIZE PAYMENT OF THE HRA
BILLS. BRAD BARGER SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED
UNANIMOUSL Y.
8. Consideration of Executive Director's Report.
. Koropchak providcd the report and reminded them ofUMC's groundbrcaking on
October 41h.
. "fhey also discussed a letter from the DA T to Barry Fluth regarding required
landscaping and that the DA T revicwed the tacade improvements to the carriagc
house. There is no brick on thc carriage houses.
. Koropchak asked the HRA what their feelings werc in regard to Steve Johnson's
project and moving it along. noting they still do not have a contract or deposit.
Lahr asked why Heaton would possibly back out and Koropchak stated Heaton
may be intercsted in pursuing something on his own. Lahr suggested the HRA
contact him. Koropchak stated she may also contact Pat Sa\\atzke.
9.
Committce Reports. Nonc
.
10. Other Business. Nonc
"'
J
.
.
.
11.
HRA Minutes - 10/02./02
Adiournment.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY BILL FAIR TO ADJOURN THE MEETING AT 6:40 P.M.
BRAD BARGER SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED.
Recorder
HRA Chair
4
.
.
.
4A.
HRA Agenda - 11/06/02
Consideration to approve ehangim! the Contract for Private Development bv and
amonl! the Citv. the HRA. and the Central Minnesota Single Familv Housinl!. LLC.
A. Reference and background:
As you recall, this is the TIF Contract for the redevelopment and workforce housing
project located on Minnesota Street between Sill and 6th Street.
The lIRA is requested to approved changing the Contract for Private Development. The
original contact states that "the land acquisition costs ($158,000) will be paid by the
Authority to the Developer within 30 days of the date on which the Developer provides
the Authority with a payment request certificate signed by its duly authorized
representative stating: (i) that the Developer has paid Land Acquisition Costs in at least
the amount 01'$158,000; (ii) that no Event of Default has occurred and is continuing
under this Agreement; and (iii) that the Developer has received a Certificate of
Completion for at least 11 houses on the Development Property..............
The request is to change the single payment of the $158,000 up-front TIF financing to
three payments or (iii) to read: first payment (~fS53,OOO paid upon the developer having
received a Certificate of'C'ompletionfur at least 3 houses, second payment ofS52,500
paid upon the developer having received a ('ertificate o{Completionfor at least an
additional 4 houses (total o{7), and third andfinal payment of'$52,500 paid upon the
developer having received a Certificate q{Completionfhr at least an additional 4 houses
(total of' J J). All 11 homes shall to completed by December 31,2003, per the Contract.
At a breakfast meeting on October 28, Sunny Fresh Foods and Cargill presented the
Central Minnesota Single family IIousing LLC with a check for $60,000. The City
Council approved changes to the contract on October 28, 2002.
B.
Alternative Action:
I.
A motion to approve changing the Contract for Private Development by and
among the City, the lIRA, and the Central Minnesota Single Family Housing,
LLC, as stated above.
2.
A motion to deny approval to change the Contract for Private Development by
and among the City, the lIRA, and the Central Minnesota Single family I lousing
LLC, as stated above.
3.
A motion to table any action.
1
HRA Agenda - 11/06/02
.
c.
Recommendation.
The City Administrator and HRA Executive Director recommend Alternative No.1.
This was an oversight by the Central Minnesota I lousing Partnership. The changes still
provide security to the I I RA that the homes are constructed and provides the developer
with necessary up-front dollars to assist with the construction fInancing.
D. Supportinl! Data.
None.
.
.
2
ARTICLE III
.
A(:CJuisition of Pro~_; Fin;tncial Assistanc~
Section 3.I.Section 3.1. ACSluisition a11d Convey~mce of the Developlnent Prope!:!y. As
of the date of this Agreement, the Developer has entered into one or more purchase agreements
for the acquisition of the Development Property from a third-party. Neither the City nor the
Authority shall have any obligation to acquire any part of the Development Property.
Section 3.2.Section 3.5. _$oil Conditions. The Developer acknowledges that neither the
Authority nor the City makes any representations or warranties as to the condition of the soils on
the Development Property or its fItness for construction of the Minimum Improvements or any
other purpose for which the Developer may make use of such property. The Developer further
agrees that it will indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the Authority, the City, and their
governing body members, offIcers, agents, servants, and employees, from any claims or actions
arising out of the presence, if any, of hazardous wastes or pollutants on the Development
Property. The Developer's obligations under this Section 3.2 shall survive termination of this
Agreement.
.
Section 3.3. Paymeryt of Adm i nistrati ve Costs. The Authority hereby agrees that it wi 11
pay its own Administrative Costs (as hereafter defined). For the purposes of this Agreement, the
term "Administrative Costs" means out-of-pocket eosts incurred by the Authority and
attributable to or incurrcd in connection with the ncgotiation and preparation of this Agreell1ent
and other documents and agrcements in connection with the development contemplated
hereunder.
Section 3.4. Land Acquisition. In order to make development of the Minimum
Improvements economically feasible, the Authority will reimburse the Developcr, in the manner
and amounts set forth herein, for up to $15&,000 of the Land Acquisition Costs, hereby defined
as up to $158,000 of the Developer's cost of acquiring the Development Property. Any costs in
excess of these respective amounts shall be the responsibility of the Developer. Neither the
Authority nor thc City shall havc any obligation to thc Dcveloper or to any third party with
respcct to any defects in the construction of the Minimum Improvements.
Section 3.5. Financi~1g orLand Acquisition Costs. The Authority will reimburse the
Developer for the Land Acquisition Costs in accordance with the following terms and
conditions:
.
(a) Subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the Land Acquisition Costs
will be paid by the Authority to the Developer il! a_<:~_or4_l!Il~~~ith-JM,-!!!1l0~m~~~b,~-~YJ<:~JD
$53,0J)O~inlJ_~w,i~lwithin 30 days of the datc on which the Developer pro-vifle5 .bll~_r~c~y~d_
a CerJificat<: ofComnletion for__~t I~ast 3_l:lol!~es OJJ th~_-'Dey~lolli11e!1LPrQQt::!tY:-~It:;LuaJlLN
~,-e~iimJ{A4_9(thj1'Ag[~~II!~llii..-<iij .~~L~!Wi(ioDal-$5~,~Q9__~j-'l';~1~!i(LlVit~iI!~Jl Q~Y1L QLlb~
d llte__oIl___ wbi~h__JI"I~_De~_e1QP_~r-bl!~_T~_~~ivf.l,d ,JL~ert!J19!1~_ (IT. .~.~ 0 rn~leti~!LfoJ__ll! ..J~~~J.-~Il
. ",,' "'" "...
a_~dittQ}!,~l. 4__1:'-9 lI~_es (f()La _tot~!J_()f--7_H 0 IlS~J!} ol}____H!_~,-D~y~lQP_~en tXro~!!L-p~r!i--"-~!lt tQ
[)J( i-21633 7\5
MN 190-')')
7
LfA
.
.
~~l.:JiQ!, A~4__Qt thi~ Agr~cnlel}t;iJnd{iij) (1!ln_additj(Lfial$5,2,~OQwjHJ)e_l!~tid_within ~OdaysQf
tb <: ...(lat~_qn Jy_h ic h 7_.tbe-_I2-~y_~iop~r_ ..h_[l~'.. _r~c_~Jy~d_-~_Ce_rli ri~~t~_QLC:~n}pJ~i(~~~ rQr_-itI~~~L Kn~
~\(ldi!iQ~,~!I_ 4!lQ!ts~~-- (t!!t JL t()!~tL QfJJH mt~~~lC!ll_!ht?I2~Y_~\9PJ!!e_nJJ~X-9PJlXb'_- p-~Di!-l~,!!L!(!
~~~!!(tIl4_,~Qfthi~Agr~CI1!CIll, ,t\SJl pre~ondjJhHl t9 rcc~ivjng e~chlt~Y!ll~JltJwre1!ll{l<:r_,Jh_<:
pey~tQ_p~r:lJIj.~t piQ\'Jd~i) tile -At~th;rity ~ith ~--p~~yn~e)~t r~q~est e~rtiticat~ si-gn-;;d--by-it; d~ly
authorized representativc stating-c---fB10 that the Developer has paid Land Acquisition Costs in at
least the amount of $158,000;-{+i}lla~~12 that no Event of Default has occurred and is continuing
under _thi-5-MflWffi€Ht-;,-afH:i---{i-i-Y_13 Hwll4 ~-tBe--l-)@.L€4-el*l'---4as--rete-i-ve4-a--C-%r-l:i-t-i€-at€-{}-j::-GBn~p-I~
./-' l.~~ ' '(-;1 l-----tl l~,~ 16l\~"ol"r\~n "C'~"t;.. 4A17 "./-,IX h'
-1ef-at-tt-dst--- . -+- ouses OA-.tt-t~. ~>'::'B -\"fB~-ty--p-tIfErtIafl.H~m-. -tH- t lS
Agreement. The payment request cel1ifieate must be accompanied by evidence satisfactory to
the Authority that the Land Acquisition Costs have been incurred and paid by the Developer.
(b) The Authority shall not be obligated to make any payment under this Section if:
(i) there is an Event of Default on the Developer's part under this Agreement that has not been
cured; or (ii) the Dcveloper has failed to comply with the payment procedures described hcrein.
Section 3.6. fee Waivers. The City will forgive up to $42,750 of permit application and
other fees (thc "Fees") that would otherwise be due to the City and borne by the Developer in
connection with development of the Development Property, provided that if the Developer does
not reccive a CertifIcate of Completion for the Minimum Improvements pursuant to Section
4.4(a) of this Agreement, the Developer shall pay to the City any Fees forgiven pursuant to this
Section 3.6.
Section 3.7. ~usiness Subsidy ANeemcnt. The Business Subsidy Act does not apply to
this Agreement because the assistance being provided hereunder is to promote housing
opportunities within the City.
Section 3.&. Cit~nd AuthorityJntern~LYinancing Arra!:!gemen~. (a) In order to enable
the Authority to provide the Land Acquisition Costs financing to the Developer described herein,
the City shall loan the Authority $158,000 (the "Loan") on or before the date on which the
Authority becomes obligated to pay such amount to the Developcr. The Authority shall repay
the City for the Loan, with interest thereon at 5.00% per annum commencing to accrue on the
date such loan is made. Repayments will be made solely from and to the extent of Available Tax
Increment, hereby defined as 9m/o of Tax Increment, and will be paid by the Authority to the
City on each February 1 and August I (cach such datc a "Payment Date") commencing on
August 1, 2004 and terminating on the earlier of February 1, 2030 or thc date the Authority has
repaid the Loan in full pursuant to this Section 3.8.
(b) The Authority shall additionally reimburse the City for the Fees forgiven by the
City pursuant to Section 3.6 ofthis Agreement (the "Waived Amount"), with no interest accruing
on the Waived Amount. Such reimbursements shall be made from excess tax increment
generated by one or more of the Authority's other housing tax increment districts in the City to
the cxtent that such tax increment may lawfully used 1'01' such purpose and shall be made no later
than a reasonable time after thc Developer has received a Certificate of Completion for the
Minimum Improvcments.
.
O.lCi"2 I 6.137v5
MN 190-99
8
.
.
.
4B.
HRA Agenda -II /()6/02
Consideration to approve amendin1! the TIF District No. 1-22 expenditure for the
sidewalk/pathwav along Sunny Fresh.
A. Reference and back1!round:
This is a housekeeping item. At the time of the Sunny Fresh expansion a couple of years
ago, the I-IRA approved a TIF contribution of the proposed sidewalk/pathway along
Sunny fresh. The amount approved was up to $17,500, the estimated cost by WSB, Inc.
In 200 I, $16,340 was transferred from T'IF District No. 1-22 for the sidewalk/pathway.
At the City Council public hearing for adopting the proposed assessment roll for the
Walnut Corridor, the amount of the assessment for the eight foot pathway to the HRA
was $20,582.40. Therefore, the HRA is asked to approve the actual increase or
difTercnce of $4,242.40.
B. Alternative Action:
I. ^ motion to approve amending the TI F District No. 1-22 expenditure for the
sidewalk/pathway along Sunny Fresh to a total amount not to exceed $20,582,40.
2.
^ motion to deny amending TIF District No. 1-22 expenditure for the sidewalk/
pathway along Sunny fresh.
3. ^ motion to table any action.
C. Recommendation:
Recommendation is alternative no. 1.
D. Supportin1! Data:
Copy of assessment roll.
.~.
-r:<
;!::J
/::JJ)
0/ f,_~
otp~
() I'"
/ ...:;
..G
()
-tz
IO
m-t
-tm
0"
-t(J)
>c
,z
>z
0-<
O'TI
-;;0
::!m
O(J)
ZI
>I
,>
'TI(/)
0>
OG)
);!;;o
G)m
mm
-to
o-t
(/)0
c"O
z>
z-<
-<'TI
'TIO
;;0;;0
m-t
(/)I
Im
-(J)
(/)-
CIlO
CIlm
O~
r>
'n,
, ^
@>
<T>(/)
-...J(J)
Om
OO(/)
" (/)
~~
. Z
~-t
!'V'TI
000
0;;0
>"0
z>
0;;0
IO
>m
en,
OJ(/)
mz
~o
>~
O~
000
00>
m'!-^'
O~
-t_-...J
0<.0
"OC!
>-
;;og::
000
mw
,-...J
-",<.0
U1Qo
'f<.O
0<.0
-"'N
o
6
-'"
<D
o
CIl
o
Ioen
~-< <:
o ~
-0
s::...,
o C!>
:::I (1)
~ ^
00
~(1)
o <
Q~
~ ~
C!> :::I
..., (1)
~o
'TIC!>
<:: :::I
:::I ~
c..~
N
00
N
o
<T>VlU}
tft Sf> ~ ,CIl
"'<D",,-I>-
~::'ci~~
./:>. CIl' CIl
coo~o
t....
""
-~
VI_O
NU1
00>
- N
Ol-
eo-/>-
NO
~
o
-"'~.-"'-"'-"'-"'-"'-"'-"'-"'<.O
t;;~ :l't3~~~~~8~
-...J NNCIl-/>-OO>01<D
---30.~...... -""...l..
0101010101
0101010101
bbabe
---io.~...... .............Jo.
00000
bbbba
00000
CIlO1CIlCIl-...J
000-"'0
-/>-<DCIlOCIl
00000
.................. ---A..""""""............
01010101010101
'f 'f 'f 'f 'f 'f 'f "'0
0000000
o~~oao~ b
j I I I I I I
8~~~~88 z
o~~~~oo ~
-/>-CIlOOCIl-"'-/>-W
-"'000000
-t^S::S::[JJO'--.(J)(J)(J)(J)~~
"" 0 Cll Cll ro l"" 0 c: c: C <:: Cll Cll
ro3"'''''~r-<:J:J~::J:::J_~
~ ~ -g -g _(1)' 8. .~ R ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
!!!.~~~[!1S::>'TI'TI'TI'TI:;:;
:]~ CDCD~O<romCb@--
s. c.... CD []J ~ ~ S' en en U) t/J ~ ~
(J) 0 Cll Cll 0' :::J":::r :::r "" Cll Cll
(1)5::l:::l>(1)"""""
c5m?"?'coQogggg
:::I' s:: s:: < (J) 0. 0. 0. 0.
o 0 -t 0 =: p' .~ .en _en
:J::J2o::L_ _
g-ff'!!l.3j!iL'lgg
~ ~ 3> - , . ,
o 0 s-
-Z
()
(1)
::l
~
mommm~~~~~O')~O:;
01 O1CIlO1<J>ONO>-...JCIlOO
{FI<T>VlVI{FIffl&'lVl{FI{FI<T>VI&'l
-...J-...J""-...J-...J-...J-...J-...J-...J-...J-...J-...J""
0666606660066
000>0>0000(;00>0>00000>0>00
ffi ~E.AffiK1-E;A~(A~ffi{;A~
fA.p.. ""-.J ~ . ~ .J::i,..t. '.
~o (7).....It.CO-..."JOlmcocn<.OO
&l6&l""&l30>~~0:--'01Rl
r-..,oNNr-..,0'l0><.n6'-...iNCIl6
o oooOrnoO'l.l>-CIlDOOO
:I>
en
'" ~
cD
'" "0
en
3 Cll
cD g.
:::I
lit
>
'"
en
cD
'"
en
3
(1)
:::I "'0
....
~~ ;oCll
III <
WW .... cD
o 0 cD .,
-...J -...J 03
:l.
n
:1>'"
en
{FI en
cD
-'" VI '"
-...JW en
~u. 3
-/>-N
0> DO cD
~0 ;;;l
....
01 0
>
'"
en
~ cD -t
en @
i--v '"
3 cD
-...J
0 <D
:::I
01 ....
(FI ~VI Ul
-'" --'
W WW LV
0 66 0
-...J "" -...J ."
....
..... VI <T> VI ffl
..... W .... .... (..)
0 0 O-...J
). "./:>. -N--/>- N
0 O>./:>. ""
N W 0>00 0>
;.." 0, 6~ 01
<0 <D <001 -'"
VI 6'l (A
'" .I>- .I>-
~ N N
./:>. W <..)
0 01 01
~ 9 0
"0
III
n
!.
o
~
;;;l
cD
.,
"
.,
o
::!.
'TI
o
o
S'
(g
<D
C/l
is:
:1>(1)
'" :E
en III
<D -
'" '"
'" >
3 en
cD '"
;;;l <D
... '"
;;0'"
III 3
....<D
cD ::s
....
:I>
en
'"
cD
en
en
3
<D
::!.
3!:
o
:::I
c:
:E
en
OJ
"'IJ~en
a 0 c:
....... :3 III
Ill-:\:
~ o' ~
III ::0:-
Z="'IJ
~ .0 ...
.... ~.2.
~zl!:
UI -
,
o
o
N
C'
BRA Minutes - 01/05/00
.
Koropchak also provided a list of the BRA commissioners' terms after Council
appointment in January.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY BOB MURRAY AND SECONDED BY STEVE
ANDREWS TO RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL THE APPOINTMENT
OF BRAD BARGER FOR A FIVE YEAR HRA TERM. Motion carried.
5. Consideration of items removed from the consent al!enda for discussion.
None.
6. Consideration to hear and apProve a concept for use of TIF assistance for public and site
improvements associated with the Sunny Fresh Foods expansion.
Ollie Koropchak advised that Don Roberts of Sunny Fresh was not able to attend the
meeting. She gave a brief summary of Sunny Fresh's plans for expansion and their intent
for instaIJation of a sidewalk on Walnut Street, as weIJ as a possible pathway being
instaIJed. Sunny Fresh is not looking at TIF assistance for their expansion but for
improvements such as pathways and sidewalks which are consistent with downtown
revitalization plan.
.
Mark Ruff, Ehlers & Associates, addressed the members regarding the possibility of an
agreement between Sunny Fresh and the BRA for TIF assistance for some of their
improvements. Steve Bubul, Kennedy & Graven, advised that this particular project
would most likely qualify for TIF assistance, but advised the need to make sure that the
HRA looks at how this money is being spent, i.e. cleaning up blights, enhancing the area
and not just using TIF to provide assistance to a building in the district that does not meet
the blight test as that could create a problem. There needs to be a rationale that ties the
findings back to the original plan.
Jeff O'NeiIJ also advised that when the City did their redevelopment plan it was to
enhance the conditions such as pedestrian pathways/sidewalks and updated the
commissioners on the Planning Commission's approval for a concept plan for Sunny
Fresh at their meeting the previous night as weIJ as Sunny Fresh's willingness to pay their
portion of the improvements. O'Neill stated that he would like Sunny Fresh to sign a
petition to put in a sidewalk on Walnut Street with their portion of the cost being 25%.
.
The HRA approved using tax increment to assist with the construction of the foIJowing
public improvements: 75% of the cost associated with the sidewalk along the west side of
Walnut Street between 4th Street and the railroad track and the proposed pathway from 4th
Street southerly along Linn Street then easterly along the railroad tracks to Walnut Street.
It is anticipated the tax increment collected from the Sunny Fresh expansion of 17,000 sq.
ft. will cover these public improvement costs. The approval is consistent with the
-2-
yi?
~
,.
HRA Minutes - 01/05/00
.
Downtown Revitalization study, Planning Commission approval, allows for a safe
pedestrian route to the community center, and is endorsed by Sunny Fresh. Staff will be
working with Burlington Northern to obtain the go-ahead.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY BRAD BARGER AND SECONDED BY STEVE
ANDREWS TO APPROVE A CONCEPT FOR USE OF TIF ASSISTANCE FOR
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE SUNNY FRESH FOODS
EXP ANSI ON. Motion carried.
7. Consideration to adopt a resolution providintr for the Sale of $7,555.000 Public Proiect
Revenue Bonds, Series 2000A.
Mark Ruff, Ehlers & Associates, addressed the HRA regarding the refinancing of the
Community Center. The temporary bonds balloon in February 2001and are currently
caIJable in February 2000. A copy of the resolution for adoption by the HRA
determining it necessary to issue the Authority's Bonds to finance the Community Center
through the refinancing of the Temporary Bonds was provided as well as a copy of the
Bond Sale Report and resolution for adoption by the City Council
.
Mr. Ruffrecommended the City shorten up to 15 years and structure the payments around
the City's debt levies which gives a level predicable payment stream so that if the City
has other projects they won't make the payment go up and down.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY BRAD BARGER AND SECONDED BY STEVE
ANDREWS TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE SALE OF
$7,555,000 PUBLIC PROJECT REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 2000A. Motion
carried.
8. Consideration to adopt a resolution modifyinl! various budtrets ofTIF Districts and
modifying the Redevelopment Plan of Central Monticello Redevelopment Proiect No.1.
Mark Ruff, Ehler's and Associates, provided the members with the result of the Quick
TIF Program and the reports thereof generated, it was noted that some line-items within
the TIF budgets did not meet the line-item of the expenditures. It was suggested the HRA
modify the budget and plans for consistency between the plans and the reports to the
State Auditor.
.
Mark Ruff provided a handout on sources and uses of funds noting that each line should
have estimates. He will provide more information at the next meeting. The State Auditor
has taken the position that the HRA needs to formally modify the plans if the
expenditures are more or less than what was submitted previously. If the City would get
,.,
-.)-
.
.
.
HRA Agenda - 11/6/02
4C. Consideration to approve changine the date of the reeular meeting of the HRA from
January 1,2003. to .January 8, 2003.
A. Reference and background:
This a housekeeping item. Because the January I-IRA meeting falls on New Years Eve
Day, the 1 '\ please approve changing the date to the followi ng Wednesday.
B. Alternative Action:
1 . A motion to approve changi ng the date of the regular meeting of the HRA from
Wednesday, January 1,2003, to Wednesday, January 8, 2003.
2. A motion to approve changing the date of the regular meeting of the I-I RA from
January 1,2003, to
C. Recommendation:
Recommendation Alternative No.1.
.
.
.
2003 CALENDAR OF MEETING DA TES
*
1/1/2003 HRA - 6 p.m.
1/13/2003 Council- 7 pm.
1/23/2003 MCC - 4:30 p.m.
1/28/2003 EDA - 7 pm.
2/5/2003 HRA - 6 p.m.
2/13/2003 Parks Commission - 4:30 pm.
2/24/2003 Council - 7 p.m.
3/5/2003 HRA - 6 p.m.
3/20/2003 Parks Commission - 4:30 p.m.
3/27/2003 MCC - 4:30 pm.
4/2/2003 HRA - 6 pm.
4/17/2003 Parks Commission ~ 4:30 p.m.
4/24/2003 MCC - 4:30 p.m.
5/6/2003 Planning Commission- 7 p.m.
5/12/2003 Council - 7 pm.
5/22/2003 MCC - 4:30 p.m
6/3/2003 Planning Commission- 7 p.m.
6/9/2003 Council - 7 p.m.
6/23/2003 Council - 7 p.m
7/1/2003 Planning Commission- 7 p.m.
7/14/2003 Council - 7 pm.
7/24/2003 MCC - 4:30 p.m
8/5/2003 Planning Commission- 7 p.m.
8/11/2003 Council - 7 p.m.
8/21/2003 MCC - 430 p.m
9/2/2003 Planning Commission- 7 pm.
9/15/2003 Council - 7 p. m.
9/25/2003 MCC - 4:30 pm.
10/1/2003 HRA - 6 p.m
10/13/2003 Council ~ 7 p.m.
10/27/2003 Council - 7 p. m
11/5/2003 HRA - 6 p.m
11/20/2003 Parks Commission ~ 4:30 pm.
11/27/2003 MCC - 4:30 p.m.
12/3/2003 HRA - 6 pm.
12/18/2003 Parks Commission - 4:30 p.m. *
*
1/7/2003 Planning Commission - 7 pm.
1/16/2003 Parks Commission - 4:30 p.m.
1/27/2003 Council - 7 p.m.
2/4/2003 Planning Commission - 7 pm.
2/10/2003 Council - 7 p.m.
2/20/2003 MCC - 4:30 p.m.
3/4/2003 Planning Commission - 7 p.m.
3/10/2003 Council - 7 p.m.
3/24/2003 Council - 7 p.m.
4/1/2003 Planning Commission - 7 p.m.
4/14/2003 Council - 7 p.m
4/22/2003 EDA - 7 p.rn
4/28/2003 Council - 7 p.m
5/7/2003 HRA - 6 p.m
5/15/2003 Parks Commission - 4:30 p m.
5/26/2003 Council - 7 p.m.
6/4/2003 HRA - 6 p.m
6/19/2003 Parks Commission - 4:30 p.m.
6/26/2003 MCC - 4:30 pm.
7/2/2003 HRA - 6 p.m
7/17/2003 Parks Commission - 4:30 pm.
7/28/2003 Council - 7 pm.
8/6/2003 HRA - 6 p.m
8/14/2003 Parks Commission - 4:30 p.m
8/25/2003 Council - 7 p.m.
9/3/2003 HRA - 6 pm.
9/18/2003 Parks Commission - 4:30 pm.
9/29/2003 Council - 7 p.m
10/7/2003 Planning Commission - 7 pm.
10/16/2003 Parks Commission - 4:30 p.m.
11/4/2003 Planning Commission - 7 p.m
11/10/2003 Council-7 p.m.
11/24/2003 Council - 7 p.rn
12/2/2003 Planning Commission - 7 pm.
12/8/2003 Council - 7 pm.
12/25/2003 MCC - 4:30 p.m.
Trish: The above is a list of regularly scheduled meetings for 2003 Those with * may be changed
because they fall on a holiday and will either be switched to the next night or the same day the
following week.
Ltu
.
.
.
HRA Agenda - 11/6/02
5.
Consideration to approve assi2:nment of the Contract for Private Development
between the HRA and T. J. Martin, Inc. from T. J. Martin, Inc. to WHL
Enterprises, Inc. and amend certain conditions within the Contract
A. Reference and Background:
As you recall, the property taxes for TIF District No. 1-21 have been delinquent for a
couple of years plus the tax increment guarantee deficiency is delinquent. Lake Tool had
a liquidation sale in August and the real estate closing will take place in the next week or
so. The buyer is WHL Enterprises, Inc., P.O. Box 249, Monticello, MN 55362. The
WHL stands for Wayne, I lolli, and Lisa Hoglund. Mr. Hoglund has requested the
Contract be assigned to WilL Enterprises and will be present at the HRA meeting to
inform you of the nature of the business and the number of jobs and wages at the facility.
I believe the intended use of the building will no longer be for manufacturing. If that's
the case, the obligations of the contract will need to be met and the district terminated. If
the nature of the business is manufacturing, the HRA must have documentation that the
tax increment guarantee deficiency past due is paid and an escrow account is established
by the seller for future tax increment guarantee deficiencies. Mark Ruff will run
projected tax increment deficiencies.
I have requested I-IRA Attorney Greensweig to prepare an Assignment of the Contract
from 1. J. Martin, Inc. to WilL Enterprises, Inc. including certain changes to the
Contract. Available at HRA meeting.
Delinquent property taxes must be paid in full prior to transfer of the property. Attached
is a copy of the current and projected tax increment guarantee deficiency estimates
prepared by the Economic Development Director.
B. Alternative Action:
I. Consideration to approve assignment of the Contract fiJr Private Development
between the HRA and T. J. Martin, Inc. from T. J. Martin to WHL Enterprises,
Inc. and to amend certain conditions within the Contract.
2. Consideration to deny approval of assignment of the Contract t'cJr Private
Development between the HRA and T. J. Martin, Inc. from T. J. Martin to WHL
Enterprises, Inc.
3. Consideration to table any action.
HRA Agenda - 11/6/02
.
c.
Recommendation:
In the best interest orthe I-lRA and seller, recommendation is Alternative No. I.
D. Supporting Data:
Copy of the Assignment and tax increment guarantee estimates.
.
.
2
October 14, 2002
MONTICELLO
Mr. Gregory Smith
Attorney at Law
207 Walnut Street
P.O. Box 66R
Monticello. MN 55362
Dear ()reg:
In responsc to your letter of October 9,2002, enclosed is the estimated Tax Increment Deficiency
as to Oetobcr 14, 2002. In checking with the County on October 14, 2002, the property taxes for
payable 200 I (first-half) and payable 2002 (first-half) are delinquent with one day remaining on
the property tax payment due for the second-half 2002. The estimates assume no payment by
October 15. 2002.
.
In talking vvith thc current owners. it is my understanding there has been an escrow account
established t()r the purpose of the tax increment detkiency; however, I have no cvidence of this.
Also attached is an excerpt fi"Ol11 the Contract ft)I" Private Development between the Housing and
Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Monticello, Minnesota (BRA..) and
T. J. Martin. Inc. relative to Restrictions of Use. Should there be a potential buyer of the
property. the Contract can be assigned with approval of the commissioners of the HRA. The
HRA meets the first Wednesday of each month at 6:00 p.m. within the Monticello Community
Center.
Should you have further questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 763-271-3208.
Sincerely,
CITY OF MONTICELLO
rr... ..
'-.:..J Q9. ~ L,
~~~~~
Ollie Koropchak
Economic Development Director
Attachments
c:
TIF No. I -21 File
HRA Attorney Dan Greensweig, Kennedy & Graven
.
Monticello City Hall. 505 Walnut Street, Suite I, Monticello, MN 55362-8831 . (763) 295-2711 . Fax; (763) 295-4404
Office of Public Works, 909 Golf Course Rd., Monticello, MN 55362 . (763) 295-3170. Fax; (763) 271-3272
SA
-
~I
o.
,r,
r- ('"'I
. -.c c.c
c.c ('"'1
0 0 0
0 --
i.A > :>d -- r"1
('"'I
U :.J .....--- --
e: ,.... 01 "'1'"
t- V IlJ 0 0
0 :.J ,.... 0 0
0 I- e: 81 v;. "'l
....... >
0 V ~ 01
0 0 ~ i.A i.A
r-
01
i.A
>
~ (/"]
~ .~
?f:. u
c
V
CO U
('"'1 <n t;::: 0 CO 0, r- r- r"1 r"1 0 0
, 0 V t"- O O,~ CO -.c 1..0 0, c- 01 01
........ 0
........ 0 <n <n r.... r'l 'S. -.c~ <r;. <n
0 ........ ~ <n i.A 01 01 01 01
Z IlJ i.A i.A + i.A i.A i.A i.A i.A i.A i.A
Cd
f- :-
U ~
52 ~ c
f- a
t- ?f:. .....
C/) -.c c r- r- t"- r- r- r- r- r- r- r-
0 V 0 q 0, 0 o~ o~ 0, 0 0 0
-;- QJ
In <n In In <n <n <n In In <n
w.... ('"'1 0::: i.A i.A i.A i.A i.A i.A i.A i.A i.A i.A
[:: 0 0
0 0
I ('"'I 0 [::
r .,j 0
0 V
u :c
z :- i.A ~ 01 01 -;- "'1'" CO CO
. W V ^ r- In CO 0 0 r- r- <n <n
..D "@
a ':? <n q "1:. t;. t"- r.... r'1 'n 'n
U ;...
U o' -< 0 r') r- r') 0 r') r') 0 ('"'I 0 ('"'1 01 01
0 i.A i.A i.A i.A i.A i.A i.A i.A i.A i.A i.A i.A i.A
w.... 0 0
~ r')
0 -0
V
w.... 0 u
f= 0 2:!
0
-0 co -.c 0' -.c '-0 01 01 "'1'" -;-
0 0 -.c r.... '-0 -;- -;- r') r')
u...l 0 U O,~ CO CO ........ 'S 1..0 oc: co,
f- i.A f- 0 r.... r-.: r.... 0 ."r "'1'" 0 ('"'..1 0 01 01 01
-< V i.A i.A i.A i.A iA i.A iA i.A iA i.A i.A iA iA
~ (/"]
V
1= Cd I~I
C/) 0::: c- o 0 ....... 01 01 r') r') "'1'"
W 0' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(/"] c- O 0 0 0
(/"] 0 0 0 0 0
~ ('"'1 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 ('"'.1
U CJl ..D =n .0 CJl ..D CJl ..; ..D ..; CJl ..; ..D ..;
=: V =: 1) =: tl 1l =: '" IlJ (/"] =: (/"] V '"
-< w.... -< w.... -< ~ w.... -< W u.... '-Ll -< W w.... W
-.c
0,
0'
--- 0\ 0 01 r')
01 ; 0' c- o 0 0 0 01 0 r')
,.... c- O' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
....... V C' 01 0 01 0 01 0 01 0
:.J ~I~ 81 01 01 01 01
'C ~ U >-. ..... >-. ...... >-. ...... >-\ .....
..... ~ C':l U ~ U C':l U ~ U
(/"] ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ::E 0
0
w....
f-
-0 0 0 0 0 0
v 0 0 0 0 0
lC q :::? 0 "'l ?f:. 01 :::?
~I 0 0 :::? d :::? ?f:. r') ?f:. ';;!( 0 ?f:. 0' 0 :::?
....... <n 0 0
:- t"- o r- 0 CO '" 0 '"
V 01 "'1'" <n Cl "'1'" "1: 01"1: "'1'" r') 'n c: r') <n 0
. U i.A N r') i.A 01 r') i.A 01 r.... i.A 01 i.A 01
so
o 0
01 01
,,!, <n
01 (".1
fA <iA
r- r-
c;. c;.
<n 'n
fA <iA
'.II In
In 1'1
01 01
fA fA
"'1'" -;-
r'i r....
co co
(",1 ('"'I
<iA fA
"'1'" In
o 0
o 0
01 ('"'1
=tJ.....:..D.....
::l V'.J Q) U':l
<C~w....u...l
"'T
o
o
('"'I
>-.
C':l
~
-;-
o
o
01
.....
u
a
o
o
0l :::?
C'o?f:-
r') In 0
fA (".1
o 0
(",I 01
In <n
01 01
<iA fA
r- r-
o. 0
<n <n
fA <iA
In In
<n In
0,1 0.1
fA <iA
-;- -;-
r.... r....
co co
(,""I 01
<iA <iA
<n 1..0
g 0
01 ~
~ ..- ..0 ~
,....j r.n Ij) "'.!
<Cu...lC-.l..u...l
<n
o
o
01
>-.
C':l
~
'.II
o
o
01
.....
u
o
o
o
010 ::s:::0
do?f:-
r.... '.II c:
<iA 01
C/)
-.J
<
f-
a
f-
o
o
o
"'1'"
fA
C'
"'1'"~
0,
(",)
fA
-;-
C'
c;
o
r-
fA
'n
r-
<n
-;-
<iA
r'i
0-
........
~
-;-
<iA
.....
:::
v <C 01 r')
EciS2S2
~::C:~~
::: >-. r-
~..D~
...... r') C':l
C':lo""O
G' N ""@
[; ""0 2
._ v u
~ ~ ~
o>?f:-
~ 'n
1= v 01
........DCO
v 0
Cl..f--.
o
o
c;.,
I.n
<iA
>
""0
....
Ci3
o
o
01
1)
:c
C':l
>-..
C':l
0.
t-
eE
VJ
v
;<
C':l
f-
>-.
t8
[0
2 ('"'.1
Q..
:::
o
VJ
v
Cd
,.....
c:
.....
....
v
=:
0"
.S
1:)
o
tl
v
V
I-
C':l
V
r/l
V
,.....
f-
>-..
..D
U
~ 'C;:;
::: Cl..
:3 01
r/l0
r/lo
<01
01
o
--
01
--
01
Q
C':l
=
c:
~
.....,
v
.....
~
u
""@
=:
......
u
u
~
?f:-
<n
01
co
@)@)
r') r')
C' 0\
\C~I..O
01 01
Vl <iA
o
('"'I
trl
fA
o
~ V
d..D
~
r') >-..
<iA ,,~
4-
o CJl
> ~
~ :::
u...l ~[j
v
r/l..D
~ r/l
C':l 2:!
f- ~
2:\ =
t .2
0......
9 23
6:'-=
....... Or;)
c: VJ
v ~
~ u
;;r ,,-0
- 0"-
1:)0
"0 01
0"0
Z @
r/l?f:-
~ 'n
c
=
VJ
r/l
<C
r....
"0 0
....0
a ("1
f-
C/)
w.;
0:::
u...l
f--.
Z
f-
:J
o
:c
f-
~
r
u
z
u...l
"-
U
r;:
u...l
o
r::
-.J
-<
f-
a
f-
o
u...l
f-
<C
:2
1=
C/)
~
.
f-
C/)
u...l
0:::
u...l
f-
~
+
1..0
o
In
'n
('"'.1
fA
<n
o
o
01
1)
::0
~
>-.
~
,..,
--
....
"BJ
::l
o
:-
.c
.....
r'i
o
o
('"'1
1)
:c
~
>-.
~
~
CJl
c
:::
c
~j
1)
..D
o
o
0l
C'
.
r')
<iA
4-
o
>
:2
u...l
.....
,.....
a
tl
....
6
:.J
~
r/l
V
E
-'
r/l
r/l
<
.
.
~
.
.
j
~u J
l.J .
ARTICLE X
Additional Provisions
Section 10,1. Conflict of Interests: Authoritv Representatives Not Individually Liable.
The Authority and the Developer, to the best of their respective knowledge, represent and agree
that no member, official, or employee of the Authority shall have any personal interest, direct or
indirect, in the Agreement, nor shall any such member, official, or employee participate in any
decision relating to the Agreement which affects his or her personal interests or the interests of
any corporation, partnership, or association in which he or she is, directly or indirectly, interested.
No member, official, or employee of'the Authority shall be personally liable to the Developer,
or any successor in interest, in the event of any default or breach by the Authority or the County
or for any amount which may become due to the Developer or successor or on any obligations
under the terms of the Agreement.
Section 10.2. Equal Emplovment Opportunity. The Developer, for itself and its
successors and assigns, agrees that during the construction and operation of the Minimum
Improvements provided for in the Agreement it will comply with all applicable federal, state and
local equal employment and non-discrimination laws and regulations.
Section 10.3. Restrictions on Use. The Developer agrees that, during the term of this
Agreement, the Developer, and such successors and assigns, shall not unlawfully discriminate
upon the basis of race, color, creed, sex, national origin, or any other prohibited basis in the sale,
lease, or rental or in the use or occupancy of the Development Property or any improvements
erected or to be erected thereon, or any part thereof, and shall devote the Development Property
to the operation of the Minimum Improvements as a manufacturing facility.
Section IDA. Provisions Not Merged With Deed. None of the provisions of this
Agreement are intended to or shall be merged by reason of any deed transferring any interest in
the Development Property and any such deed shall not be deemed to affect or impair the
provisions and covenants of this Agreement.
-
Section 10.5, Titles of Articles and Sections. Any titles of the several parts, Articles, and
Sections of the Agreement are inserted for convenience of reference only and shall be disregarded
in construing or interpreting any of its provisions.
Section 10.6. Notices and Demands. Except as otherwise expressly provided in this
Agreement, a notice, demand, or other communication under the Agreement by either party to
the other shall be sufficiently given or delivered if it is dispatched by registered or certified mail,
postage prepaid, return receipt requested, or delivered personally; and
(a) in the case of the Developer, is addressed to or delivered personally to the
Developer at 1248 East Oakwood Drive, Monticello, Minnesota 55362, Attention: President;
and
DJGU1368
MN190-58
21
,i:
~~
I~~l~
~~'~
Wr
W
76
~.~t
,rd
I I
/<
r Ie
OIB
J~~li
~lrc
~I,
i lii
f/' .
Iq
pi ~l
~ hll
IF
rIp
1'i1C
1~1~
9~'
I .
f :~UI
Vi
f
.
.
.
HRA Agenda - 11/6102
6.
Continued _ Consideration to hear an update on the oro!!ress for redevelooment of a
portion of Block 52.
A. Reference and baek!!round:
With a COlnmencement construction date of March 2003 to meet the August 1,2004 I1F
expenditure date for up-front monies and no follow-up from McComb/Johnson, the
cOlnmissioners suggested Heaton and Sawatzke be contacted to present a project to the
I IRA if interested. Both Heaton, Sawatzke, and Dragsten have been encouraged to
attend the HRA meeting and present a concept to the HRA for downtown redevelopment
consideration.
At the August I-IRA meeting, the commissioners authorized entering into a Preliminary
Development Agreement with Johnson and Heaton. It is my understanding from both
parties last month, the proposed Johnson/Heaton partnership had dissolved. lleaton may
be interested in redevelopment of his property and the HRA lot. According to Johnson
the plan is no for Phase I to be developed by Johnson and Phase II maybe
Johnson/Heaton. Johnson plans to attend November BRA meeting to present refined
numbers. lie was again reminded of the deadline construction date of March 2003.
Attached is a list of things to accomplish in order to meet the deadline date.
.
.
.
Block 52 - Things to do.
Dctermine boundary of project for Phase I and Phase I I.
Dctermine developers of project for Phase I and Phase II.
Is liRA ok with perhaps Phase I developed only?
Execution of Preliminary Development Agreement and deposit of$5,OOO.
HRA and Planning/Building concept approval of project for Phase I and/or Phase II.
How is parking handled?
Level of Ill" assistance fiJr Phase I.
Developer financing in place.
Preparation and execution of Contract for Private Redevelopment prior to demolition permit.
Building/Site plan review and approvals. Development Agreement.
Building Demolition Permit. March 2003
lank Removal Permit.
Sui lding Permit.
TI F Up-front expenditures - July 31, 2004
Occupancy Permit. December 2004.
Phase II construction 2004.
Phase 1\ occupancy 2005.
(0
.
.
.
HRA Agenda. 11/6/02
7.
Consideration to endorse the formation of a subcommittee to complete the Business
Park Development 101 Exercise ~md to appoint a representative.
A. Reference and back1!round:
The HRA had suggested the Economic Development Director attend the NAIIRO
Conference in September and to attend the Business Park Development 101 session.
Attachment A is an outline from this session. I believe the exercise has merit and would
prioritize sitcs for industrial development as identified in the Comp Plan amendment or
elsewhere. It is the IDe's objective and recommendation that the committed reserve
funds be us cd to purchase 200 acres of land for future industrial development. The IDC
on November 5 is requested to endorse the formation of a subcommittee, the same as the
HRA. The thought is to form a small group of a representative from the HRA, IDC,
Planning Commission or City Council, public utility representative, surveyor, and
consultant as needed.
When the Comp Plan was amended in August 2002 by the City CounciL discussion
centered around the Northwest Corridor and the need to establish a task force to
implement the Comp Plan and to determine infrastructure needs, capacity, costs, and
funding to serve thc area. Infrastructure mcaning water/sewer, transportation, and
interchange.
The 101 Excrcise prioritizes the industrial site options by answering the following
questions: Which piece of dirt, how do we pay for it, and how do we sell it?
B. Alternative Action:
I. ^ motion endorse the formation of a subcommittee to complete the Business Park
Development 101 Exercise and to appoint a representati ve.
2. A motion to not endorse the formation of a subcommittee to complete the
Business Park Development 101 Exercise.
3. A motion to table any action.
C. Recommendation:
The exercise would allow for a researched, documentated decision as to what site and
suggested ways to fund.
.
.
.
Business Park
Development
101
From Dirt to Bricks
...
....
.....
....
....a
....
..**
" '11\
Barsness ConsulUng Services, Inc.
D"nlgren, Snardlow /I. Uban
Three Phases of Development
...
....
.....
....
....iIl
....:i*
..~~
. .
. Planning - What piece of dirt?
. Financing - How do we pay for it?
. Marketing - How do we sell it?
. All phases are linked and interdependent.
. Can't do Just one and be successful.
Planning Phase
...
....
.....
..".
....*
.."~
"."'~
~~ *
. Identifying the site
. Target Audience
.Office- ~
. Industrial
. Location
. Visibility
. Access
:r-ql..\
1
1
.
.
.
Planning Phase
...
....
.....
....
..."''''
..IjI~'
".",rjt
. .
. Site Characteristics
. Soli Conditions
. Wetlands
. Topography
. Vegetation
. Net Developable Acreage
Planning Phase
. Surrounding Land Use
. Existing Neighbors
. Future Neighbors
. Buffers
. Screening
. Orientallon
" Communication
...
....
....iII.
.....
....:I!l
...,t
.1IiI~~
. .
Planning Phase
. Utilities
. On-site or near-by
. Extension needed?"
. Transportation Infrastructure'
. Telecommunications '\":1\.-
'Important for financing /I. marketing phases.
...
....
.....
....
..~.*'
...-1
... ~~ 'l:=
. "
~\A.\ ~ ~
~ - ~---^."
c (,...,. "~r '\ 0 )'<l \In Ii ..,........
2
.
.
.
Planning Phase
. Take a break and evaluate.
. Can we afford it?
. If no, then look for partners or a different site.
. Can we sell it to our target audience?
. If no, then either change site or change target.
If yes, then continue the planning process.
If no, start from the beginning.
...
....
.....
....
..*.~
""illS'
..I!>"!>
. .
Planning Phase
. Zoning
. Does the zoning & guide plan match?
. Is the zoning correct for your target?
. Does the zoning compliment surrounding land
uses?
. Lot dimensions
. What size lots does your target need?
. What size is your community?
...
....
.....
....
.....'"
...:fi:
..$'*l
" .
Planning Phase
...
....
.....
....
.....'"
...~
..~~~
~" j,
. Concept Plan
. Do's and Don'ts
. Phasing Plan
. Logical Absorption
. Leave option for larger user
. Plat
. Only what you need
. Flexibility -
S'f'io,.~'~ - ~ ?o'o()O
\- S
tA.~
SC\\.I~
\o~
\'So TO
~D 0 \0
\0"\ S
on. 6c)~
~
c;. ,'~
3 0 Cl C-"t
So 0 ~- "\
c~
nod. 0 0 f...L..,. t;. ~
.Jl.--v.-- "'\ -r- ,-)
\\0 S~t5'-'i- Aood
C \..,.J\ L <) ~ G
--'}
~
~--'\ 0 Q. d
\\<'t. u-L
~ra
,.., l
-.01
cr
~~
3
.
.
.
Financing Phase
...
....
.....
.."fP
....~'
....~
..'tI~
. .
. To develop or not to develop?
. HRA as Developer
. Private Sector Developer
. Partnerships
. Private/ Public
. Public/Public
Financing Phase
...
....
.....
....
....:;:;:
..eti<
~l!ii:l-:t<
~ ~~
. Costs to Consider
. Land Acquisition
. Holding Costs
. Utilities and Roads
. Fees
. SaclWac, Park, etc.
. Sales Commission
Financing Phase
...
....
.....
....,
....:it
./ittittli
... ii' ~~
-ii. ~
. Sources of Funds
. Cash
. Bonding
. CAB, TIF, Abatement. Assessment, Deferment
. Levy
('"". Grants /) '" o;,'.lv f\ ~
L . MIF, Federal EDA. US Rural Development
~artner with Land Owner-) ~
. Option
\(V\ ~ .L '" \J ~~d.,
~<1"' \ II' ~ Au... '5 '\ t'\ v 1..,.'\ v..)JU
-OA?
wW ~ <
~ N\ ~lJ\. {~
U~,
\A~
OA.J...
'^~
~
~o
"1Iu..A
~~1.
(/
..\c WI c;
.:if \ ( (b l) 6'\J
t~ 0...0. ~-:1e..--d-
~ ~~~ 5~
~O ~ Tl-Y.
't 1; ~ "'~ ~ ~ 2f.-
<(~ ~~~
~ tJ,.v- L () "b ~
t' 0 v.----\.~
\J::LJLd'~ Q ~ ~ 0-..,.. \...A.
~
~u~- \t1-~
\"- 0... A..- ^ b 0- ~
4
.
.
.
Financing Phase
...
....
.....
....
..III.~'
....liI
.11II\;>"1'
. .
I
. Financing projects - e t'J ......... ~ '" ~ ~
. TIF
. Abatement
. IDS's
. Loan Programs
. Regional - RDC, Initiative Foundation, County
. State - MIF, Challenge Grants
. Federal - SBA, USDA, Federal EDA
. Utilities - Local Cooperative or local utility
.; ~ ~~~ ----
Marketing Phase
..
..
.. .
..
.. .
..
..
~ *
. Research is Key
. SWOT Analysis
. Competitor Analysis
. Customer Analysis
. Market Conditions
. Competitive Advantage
. Price or product
. What makes us different or better
Marketing Phase
...
....
.....
....
....~
...""
..:1:> ~~
1$ ~~
. Resources
. Political Support
. Staff
. In-house and consulting
. Financial
. Strategic Partnership
. Financial
. Advocacy
. Lead Generation
o"c--~
~)
~~ ~~--
u..-- ......9.& ... cr.v..;..
\~
,t,,~
...
O~
5
.
.
.
Marketing Phase
...
....
.....
....
......,
.......
-:"":
. Promotion Strategy
. What is our message? (competitive advantage)
. Match audience with appropriate activity
. Print Media (I.e. brochures, fact sheets, direct mall)
. Public Relations
. Advertising
. Personal Selling
. Web Site
Marketing Phase
...
....
.....
....
....:i:i:
...$
."~$
. .
. Responding to Inquiries
. Be Knowledgeable
. Be Prepared
. Be Professional
. Be Timely
Do not lose a prospect to poor customer service!
This is the one area vou have control over.
~UL-"\ s.
6
.
.
.
BRA Agenda - 11/6/02
8.
Consideration of reQuest from I DC to re-instate the use of the BRA committed
funds for purchase of land for future industrial development.
A. Reference and baek!!f(mnd:
At the] DC meeting of October 17, the members made a motion to re-instate their
recommendation to the Planning Commission and City Council that the committed
reserve funds of the HRA and City be used to purchase 200 acres of land for future
industrial development. Additionally, they requested the l-lRA re-instate the same
recommendation and thereafter a letter be drafted to the Planning Commission, City
Council, and staff stating the positions of the IDC and I-IRA. This action resulted from
discussion at the Planning Commission/City Council that the use of the reserve funds be
for infrastructure development (water, sewer, roads, interchange).
For your infl1rmation, the IDC has changed their meeting date from the third Thursday of
each month to the first Tuesday of each month in order to improve communications
between the Planning Commission and the IDC relative to industrial items. The IDC will
he ahle to review the Planning Commission agenda for related industrial items, and
discuss for a decision whether an IDC position or action is necessary or whether there is a
need to attend the Planning Commission meeting.
I did visit with liRA Chair Barger about this item and Item 7. As stated in item 7, the
Chair felt completing the 101 exercise had merit. He recalled the HRA' s position for use
of their reserve funds as: for purchase/development of land for industrial use. His
thought was to table any action until the exercise was complete before specifying the use
of the committed funds. The resolution adopted by the H RA a few years back specified
the purchase of land with several reasons listed such as: control land prices, simplifies
deals, etc.
B. Alternative Action:
1. A motion recommending the use of the committed reserve funds of the HRA and
the City for the purchase of land for future industrial development.
2. A motion recommending the use of the committed reserve funds of the I IRA and
the City for purchase/development of land for industrial use.
3. A 1110tion to table any action.
BRA Agenda - 11/6/02
.
c.
Recommendation:
The HRA Chair and Executive Director recommend alternative no. 3. Upon completion
of the exercise, perhaps the consideration might be to partner with a land owner, some
sites may be cost prohibited, or do not meet the time fi:ame for development of industrial
land.
D. Supporting Data:
HRA resolution previously adopted.
.
.
2
.
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
IN AND FOR THE CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA
~
-.~
r
.,f!"
.
-!i-
t
t
:~
-$
'~
"
'{
t-
~
)~
RESOLUTION NO. 99-4
Resolution recommending the City Council actively pursue the acquisition of th.\>!'
Goeman/Chadwick properties for industrial development'
and authorize city staff to begin preparation thereof. .
WHEREAS, the Monticello Housing and Redevelopment Authority ("Authority")
endorses the City of Monticello Comprehensive Plan and the Community Vision and Govern""
Policies; and
WHEREAS, the Authority endorses the economic development efforts of the City of
Monticello through the administration of the Central Monticello Redevel.opment Project No. 1:
Plan and the Marketing Plan; and "
WHEREAS, the Authority previously committed a total of$150,000 toward the
acquisition or development of industrial land; and
.
WHEREAS, the Authority previously requested the City Council match the Authority'
$150,000 for acquisition or development of industrial land; and
WHEREAS, the City Council previously committed a total of $150,000 toward the
acquisition or development of industrial land; and
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Commissioners of the
Monticello Housing and Redevelopment Authority as follows:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
.
Acquisition of said properties will control land prices.
Acquisition of said properties will control and simplify development schedules.
Acquisition of said properties will diversify ownership of industrial lands.
Acquisition of said properties will provide for a competitive market.
Acquisition of said properties will allow for flexibility in deal structuring.
Preparation for acquisition of said properties places the City of Monticello tirst in~
line to acquire.
Cb
.
.
.
HRA Resolution No. 99-4
Page 2
Adopted by the Board of Commissioners of the Monticello Housing and Redevelopment
Authority this 9th day of June , 1999,
ATTEST:
u~,<fI)~ '
Executive Director
HRA Chair
.
.
.
HRA Agenda - 11/06/02
9.
Consideration to authorize payment of HRA bills.
You will note an agreed upon adjustment to the September 30,2002 invoice for General
/-IRA matters (duplication). J also checked on the August 31 invoice for acquisition of
21 g Front Street (1lennepin County). Was an error should be Wright County. Also not
happy although small amount relative to DTED Loan - TCOC. This is not billed to the
HRA. Invoice was for a copy of the filed UCC-l.
Recommend authorization to pay.
.
City of Monticello
Accounts Payable
505 Walnut Street, Suite 1
Monticello, MN 55362
Through September 30, 2002
Kennedy & Graven, Chartered
200 South Sixth Street
Suite 470
Minneapolis, MN 55402
(612) 337-9300
October 17, 2002
Statement No. 53722
MN190-00101 General HRA Matters
MN190-00099 TIF District 1/30/2002 Housing TIF
60.00
.
~C"\
(;1-6 .0 v
Total Current Billing: ~
f l ~O . -
I declare, under penalty of law, that this
account, claim or demand is just and correct
and that no' aid.
.
.
City of Monticello
September 30,2002
MN190-00101
Page: 2
Kennedy & Graven, Chartered
200 South Sixth Street
Suite 470
Minneapolis, MN 55402
r :, 0 ''{CO
'?:;e \ ~
L.,t\o
?-\~
~
General HRA Matters
Through September 30, 2002
For All Legal Services As Follows:
9/4/2002 DJG Telephone conference with O. Koropchak regarding Front
Porch recording issues, H Windows conveyance issues,
Lake Tool security issues
OJG Telephone confe~ with O. Koropchak regarding H
Windows conv~~ issues, Lake Tool security issues
OJG Telephone conference with O. Koropchak regarding
various matters
~ · c. ;SCiJ
C -..l '<<' 9/4/2002
.
.
9/24/2002
Total Services:
Hours
Amount
75.00
0.50
0.50
7~
0.30
45.00
$
195.00
Total Services and Disbursements: $
\ ?-~ ...0 0
~
.
Kennedy & Graven, Chartered
200 South Sixth Street
Suite 470
Minneapolis, MN 55402
(612) 337-9300
41-1225694
October 17, 2002
Invoice # 53722
City of Monticello
Accounts Payable
505 Walnut Street, Suite 1
Monticello, MN 55362
c ~ 0 . ~ tJ \.,\ 0
\4~-"
"'1-'\ "'? .
MN190-00099 TIF District 1/30/2002 Housing TIF
Through September 30,2002
For All Legal Services As Follows:
9/16/2002 OJG Revise contract for private development
Total Services:
Hours
OAO
$
Amount
60.00
60.00
.
Total Services and Disbursements: $
60.00
.
.
City of Monticello
Accounts Payable
505 Walnut Street, Suite 1
Monticello, MN 55362
Through August 3'1, 2002
MN190-00001 General
Kennedy & Graven, Chartered
200 South Sixth Street
Suite 470
Minneapolis, MN 55402
(612) 337-9300
September 16,2002
Statement No. 53327
MN190-00084 DTED Loan - Twin City Die Casting
MN190-00089 Acquisition of 218 Front Street/O'Connor
MN190-00098 Hans Hagen TIF Contract
MN190-00099 TIF District 1/30/2002 Housing TIF
. MN190-00101 General HRA Matters
MN190-00103 Wurm Partnership Project- TIF 1-32
.
Total Current Billing:
I declare, under penalty of law, that this
account, claim or demand is just and correct
and that no art of it has been paid.
M
7.00
2.14
22.00
77.22
45.00
45.00
45.00
243.36
.
City of Monticello
Accounts Payable
505 Walnut Street. Suite 1
Monticello, MN 55362
MN190-00001 General
For All Disbursements As Follows:
.
.
Kennedy & Graven, Chartered
200 South Sixth Street
Suite 470
Minneapolis, MN 55402
(612) 337-9300
41-1225694
September 16,2002
Invoice # 53327
;~.
~ ~ -:'0 \. ? () '1 0
?\'b .
Photocopies
Total Disbursements:
Total Services and Disbursements: $
$
7.00
7.00
7.00
.
.
.
City of Monticello
August31,2002
MN190-00084
Page: 2
Kennedy & Graven, Chartered
200 South Sixth Street
Suite 470
Minneapolis, MN 55402
~ - Q- S t) ~ L.( ~ So \ . '3> () '10
DTED Loan - Twin City Die Casting
For All Disbursements As Follows:
Postage
Photocopies
0.74
1.40
2.14
Total Disbursements:
$
Total Services and Disbursements: $
2.14
.
Page: 3
Kennedy & Graven, Chartered
200 South Sixth Street
Suite 470
Minneapolis, MN 55402
City of Monticello
August31,2002
Ll ~ S '8:' . ~ 0 l.{ 0
? \ '"':> .
MN190-00089
Acquisition of 218 Front StreeUO'Connor
For All Disbursements As Follows:
8/1/02 \...9~pin County Recorder - Recording Fees - Final Cert
Parcel 96-5 #745564
22.00
Total Disbursements:
$
22.00
Total Services and Disbursements: $ 22.00
.
.
.
Page: 4
Kennedy & Graven, Chartered
200 South Sixth Street
Suite 470
Minneapolis, MN 55402
City of Monticello
Lt~S&3.?OYO
?\ '3 .
August 31,2002
MN190-00098 Hans Hagen TIF Contract
Through August 31, 2002
For All Legal Services As Follows:
8/7/02 CBR IC; e-mails re contract
8/8/02
CBR Revise document; fax to client; e-mail document
Total Services:
Hours
0.30
0.40
$
Amount
28.50
38.00
66.50
For All Disbursements As Follows:
.
7/31/02
Fax
Catherine B. Rocklitz - Mileage Expense
Total Disbursements:
$
1.00
9.72
10.72
Total Services and Disbursements: $ 77 .22
.
.
Page: 5
Kennedy & Graven, Chartered
200 South Sixth Street
Suite 470
Minneapolis, MN 55402
City of Monticello
~ 0 1.../'0
~l,S ~O .
?)'O ~
August31,2002
MN190-00099 TIF District 1/30/2002 Housing TIF
Through August 31, 2002
For All Legal Services As Follows:
8/29/02 DJG Telephone conference with O. Koropchak regarding
various issues
Total Services:
Hours
0.30
$
Amount
45.00
45.00
Total Services and Disbursements: $ 45.00
.
.
.
Page: 6
Kennedy & Graven, Chartered
200 South Sixth Street
Suite 470
Minneapolis, MN 55402
City of Monticello
'";2\3.
l{ (,.. ?O I . ~o l..{ 0
August 31, 2002
MN190-00101 General HRA Matters
Through August 31,2002
For All Legal Services As Follows:
8/13/02 DJG Telephone conference with O. Koropchak regarding
various matters
Hours
0.30
Amount
45.00
Total Services:
$
45.00
.
Total Services and Disbursements: $ 45.00
.
.
Page: 7
Kennedy & Graven, Chartered
200 South Sixth Street
Suite 470
Minneapolis, MN 55402
City of Monticello
August31,2002
C"~"'2 .?oYo
'-I C- ~
?\~ .
MN190-00103
Wurm Partnership Project- TIF 1-32
Through August 31,2002
For All Legal Services As Follows:
8/8/02 DJG Revise contract for private development job requirements
Total Services:
Hours
0.30
$
Amount
45.00
45.00
Total Services and Disbursements: $ 45.00
.
.
.
10.
.
.
HRA Agenda - 1116/02
Executive Director's Renort.
a) Aroplax Corporation - Copy of Jetter to the Schoen's relative to past due payment of
tax increment deficiency. Have heard no response. Also noted on the assessment roll for
delinquent utilities was Aroplax - $583.78 which includes penalty.
b) After further discussion with the HRA, MN Real Estate Journal and Wright County
Partnership, the decision was f()f the City of Monticello to jointly participate in the North
by Northwest - Site Selection Conference scheduled for November 22,2002, 8:00-12:00
noon at the Northland Inn. Our contribution of $1 ,000 is subject to the Wright County
Partnership soliciting two other communities. Benefits: The city will share in the county
booth marketing the City of Monticello and the County Executive Director will
participate in the round table panel discussions. Other scheduled participants are St.
Cloud, Chisago County, and Sherburne County. The program for the event is being
coordinated by St. Thomas University and will consist of four speakers. Without the
program agenda being finalized, the HRA elected to wait and independently participate at
the annual conference in October if the opportunity arises. 10/31/02 - County Executive
Director unable to solicit additional funding.
c) Sunny Fresh Expansion - Consideration of amendment to conditional use permit for
planned unit development ........ on the Planning Commission and City Council agendas
October 28, 2002. Amendment approved subject to certain conditions. Partial set of
building plans submitted, building permit not issued. Footing permit issued.
d) Sunny Fresh/Cargill presented the Central Minnesota Housing Partnership with a
check for $60,000 at a breakhlst on October 28. The redevelopment and workforce
housing project is ajoint effort between the City, the HRA, Sunny Fresh, and the CMl-lP.
The project would not have proceeded without the contribution from Sunny Fresh. The
corporate contribution enhances the quality of the finished product while still meeting the
targeted income levels.
e) Tax Abatement - Rick Wolfstel1er and myself attended a workshop among County
Commissioners on October 29 as they discuss the county's position relative to use of tax
abatement. Tax abatement is a financial tool available to cities, counties, etc. It works
much like TIf but is less restrictive and the tax increment revenue is generally less. This
depends on the number of taxing jurisdictions participating. Criteria must be established
prior to use. At this point, the City of Monticello has not developed nor approved any
criteria. This tool was established by Legislation a few years ago, as the TIF rules
become more restrictive. Received a copy of the county policy proposed hy Heidi
Pepper for use of state/county aid road in Albertville. Next county meeting
Novemher 19, 10:30 a.m. Rick/I have questions on the proposed policy.
f) UMC - Building plans submitted, building permit not issued, grading permit issued.
Couple of issues brought up by Don Tomann. 1. Relative to landscaping and grading
near ponding casement. Engineer Consultant comment "Do not encroach or berm in our
easement" A ponding easement (1/2 to 1 acre) exists on the southerly portion of the lot
HRA Agenda - 11/6/02
.
purchased from PfefTer. This unknown to Tomann until plat filed. Tomann position - if
he had to purchase ($32,500 to $65,000) the property, he felt they could landscape and
construct a pathway around the pond fiJr employee use; otherwise, the city can purchase
the property from UMC. Check on storm fee credits and Tomann talking to Weinend. 2.
Installation of fire hydrant along Chelsea Road. Surprise to UMC. Two fire hydrant will
be installed on site. What is the purpose of the Chelsea Road hydrant and why is it the
obligation of the buyer (business) and not the seller? 3. The building size has grown
from 60,000 to 64,000 sq It plus a 8,000 sq ft mezzanine. With the growth of the
building size, will the estimated market value increase to allow for additional TIF
assistance? Building plans at County Assessor to caleulate estimated market value of
bui lding.
g) October 23, met with Mike Hammer and Chuck Van Heel relative to proposed East 7
Street project and Fallon Avenue building. Discussed 1. Proposed County Road 18
interchange. 2. Use ofTIF for East 7 Street project - Suggested meeting with Mark Ruff
relative to potential use ofTIF. 3. Discussed fall on Avenue TIF Contract. Can they buy
down TI F debt ($] 23,411 - 12/31/02) or amend restricti ve use clause. Both are options,
suggested to approach the lIRA for authorization. 4. Reduced price on Fallon A venue
building. 5. Marketing tool: Trunk fees paid unless wet industry. 6. East 7 Street
assessments. Public hearing October 28 at Council and referred to Rick.
h) Summary of the fair Housing Discussion prepared for the Planning Commissioners
and City Council and to submit to MN Dept of TED. Note Suggested Strategies on page
3 of summary.
.
.
2
~
( , .']
) .
. J
Octo her 25. 2002
--
MONTICELLO
Paul and Steve Schoen
Aroplax Corporation
200 Chelsea Road
Monticello, MN 55362
Dear Paul and Steve:
It bas been brought to my attention tbat the final payment of $5,3 71.18 for the Tax Increment
Guarantee Deticiency for TIF District No. 1-12 is past due. If the City of Monticello records are
in error or if you have questions, please call me at 763-271-3208.
.
For your information TIF District No. 1-12 was decertified in June 2001. The district balance is
insufficient. without the tax increment guarantee deficiency payment, to cover the last bond
payment. Tbe HRA sold a bond in 1992 to provide up-front financial assistance to the Aroplax
Corporation.
Attached is a copy of the July 2002 invoice and a letter dated January 8, 2001. Thank you for
your immediate attention to this matter.
Sincercly,
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
IN AND FOR THE CITY OF MONTICELLO. MINNESOTA
0:)~ ~~6~--0~
Ollie Koropchak
Executivc Director
Attachments
c: Roger Belsaas. Mayor
Rick Wolfsteller, City Administrator
Tlf File
.
Monticello City Hall, 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1, Monticello, MN 55362-8831' (763) 295-2711 . Pax: (763) 295-4404
Office of Public Works, 909 Golf Course Rd., Monticello, MN 55362' (763) 295-3170' Fax: (763) 271-3272
J,~
..,,':.\
" .
:7.'
~"-',.."-.~
.'.. ,", ..
. ,
;. \
! t
CITY OF MONTICELLO
505 Walnut Street. Suite 1
Monticello, MN
55362
I f I I
Phone: (763) 295-2711
Fax: (763) 295-4404
.
CUSTOMER ADDRESS
Aroplax
Jerry Schoen
200 Chelsea Road
Monticello
MN 55362
DESCRIPTION
PLEASE RETURN PINK COpy
WITH PAYMENT
TIF Deficiency Repayment #1-12
2002 Installment-Final Payment
155-018-002030
.
.
I[ N V 0 I. C E
I DATE [ NUMBER j
1/22/2002 1009
8/22/2002
)
213.31154
(
PAYMENT DUE
(1% interest per month will be charged
after due date.)
Make checks payable to City of Monticello.
CUSTOMER ACCOONT 5034
J
PROJECT
PID NUMBER 155018002030
AMOONT
CATEGORY
MISC -TIF12
5371.18
TOTAL TO PAY
5311.18 *
.
.
January 8, 2001
MONTICELLO
Jerald 1. and Mary E. Schoen
Aroplax Corporation
200 Chelsea Road
Monticello, MN 55362
Dear Jerry and Mary:
Through a letter dated April 6, 2000, Aroplax Corporation was advised of the action taken by the
BRA Commissioners at their meeting of April 5, 2000. The Commissioners had made a motion
authorizing the following payment schedule for the Tax Increment Guarantee Deficiency relative
to the Contract for Private Redevelopment between the HRA and Jerald 1. and Mary E. Schoen
for TIF District No. 1-12:
Due May 5, 2000 - $6,213.40 paid May 16,2000
Due May 5, 2001 - $6,213.40 v.J." .. \ ~ - "':J-G .. \
Due May 5, 2002 - Tax Increment Guarantee Deficiency for Taxes
Payable 2000
On April 6, 2000, the cumulative Tax Increment Guarantee Deficiency through calender year
1999 was $12,426.80 and the Commissioners agreed to a payment schedule without interest as .
outlined above. The amount of tax increment collected by the City Administrator of the City of
Monticello from the Auditor of the County of Wright for Taxes Payable 2000 was $16,128.82.
Therefore, the Tax Increment Guarantee Deficiency for calendar year 2000 is $5,371.18 (Tax
Increment Guarantee $21,500 less Tax Increment collected $16,128.82.) This amount
($5,371.18) is due May 5, 2002. TIF District No. 1-12 will decertify on June 10,2001, and the
Authority shall not collect Tax Increment for Taxes Payable 2001 and thereafter.
Via a telephone conversation with Steve Schoen on AprilS, 2000, Schoen agreed this was an
Monticello City Hall. 250 E. Broadway. PO Box 1147. Monticello, MN 55362-9245 . (612) 295-2711 . Fax: (612) 295-4404
Office of Public Works. 909 Golf Course Rd.. Monticello, MN 55362' (612) 295-3170' Fax: (612) 271-3272
.
.
.
Jerald 1. and Mary E. Schoen
January 8, 2001
Page 2
acceptable solution to an unpredictable and unfortunate situation. Should you have any questions,
please do not hesitate to call me at 763-271-3208.
Respectfully,
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
IN AND FOR THE CITY OF MONTICELLO
G <L~ ""~o\ e,Jl <-~
Ollie Koropchak
Executive Director
c:
Roger Belsaas, Mayor
Rick Wolfsteller, City Administrator
File
.
SUMMARY OF THE FAIR HOUSING DISCUSSION
AT THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING
OF OCTOBER 2,2002.
As part ofthc grant application suhmitted to thc Minnesota Department of Trade and Economic
Development hy the City of Monticello for the Twin City Die Castings Company project and
because the grant dollars allocated to the City were HUD/Federal dollars, the HRA is to continue
to conduct public meetings to discuss local Fair Housing issues in the community and develop
strategies to meet any deficiencies. The commissioners also reviewed the Community FHEO
Summary Sheet submitted with the application. The following is a summary of the discussion:
Council member Brian Stumpf asked the Executive Director if she was aware of any
deficiencies? The Executive Director of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority responded
that she was unaware of any discrimination in the sale or rental of housing within the City of
Monticello. As far as any deficiencies in choice of housing? Housing permits within the last
year included: A range in value of owner~occupied , single-family housing permits (two
developments created within TIF Housing Districts) and the Landmark Square and East Th Street
rental housing permits.
I.
Definition Fair Housing Act: Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968, most commonly
known as the Fair Housing Act, prohibits discrimination in the sale or rental of housing
on the basis of race, color. religion. sex. and national origin. The Act was amended in
1988 to provide stiffer penalties and expand coverage to prohibit discrimination on the
basis of familial status ami handicap. In addition to prohibiting a wide range of
discriminatory practices. the Act requires that HUD programs be administered in a
manner that aftirmatively furthers fair housing.
.
2. Fair housing activities that may be undertaken. One such activity listed was to conduct
public mectings (city Council, county commission, housing and redevelopment
authorities. regional developmcnt commissions. realtors, landlords. and citizen groups) to
discuss fair housing issues in your community.
3. The commissioners compared the 1990 and 2000 City of Monticello population
characteristics. The source being the US Census. The individual population in 1990
was 4.941 with approximately 1 % minority and 99% non-minority. The individual
population in 2000 was 7,868 with approximately 3% minority and 97% non-minority.
The greatest change in population by race/ethnic characteristics between 1990 and 2000
were: Hispanic 25 and 153, and Asian 26 and 43. Next the commissioners compared the
1990 and 2000 City of Monticello household characteristics. Number of units in 1990
was 1.908 units with 56% o\vners and 37% renters. Number female head of households,
235. and over 65 age. 283. Number or units in 2000 was 2.944 \-vith 72% owners and
28(i'l, renters. Number female head of households, 380. and over 65 age. 234.
.
.
.
.
4.
The commissioners then looked at a Profile of Selected Economic Characteristics, 2000,
for City of Monticello. See Attachment A. Noted was the mean travel time to work, 26
minutes: median household income, $45,384: median family income, $53,566; median
earnings for male, $4 \,057 and female, $25,854: poverty status in 1999 - families 89 and
families with female householder, no husband present. 43: median value of specified
owner-occupied units, $130.200: and median gross rent of specified renter-occupied
units. $57 I.
5.
Reviewed excerpts from the City of Monticello Building Code and Comprehensive Plan
Goals and Policies: The City should monitor housing development in an effort to provide
a full range of housing choices.
6.
From the League of Minnesota Cities: The Federal Government Of1ice of Federal
Contract Compliance has advised that cities receiving federal funding need to work
directly with the Federal Agency from which funding is received to determine if an
aUirmative action plan is required.
7.
Reviewed fair housing issues or impediments in Greater Minnesota as listed in the
statewide Analysis of Fair Housing conducted by the Minnesota Department of Housing
Finance.
FAIR HOUSING ACTIVITIES COMPLETED
WITHIN THE CITY OF MONTICELLO
I.
In 200 I, the Monticello IIousing and Redevelopment Authority authorized the Central
Minnesota Housing Partnership to conduct a housing plan for the City of Monticello as
part of the Wright County Housing Plan.
2.
In 200 I, a joint meeting was held among the Monticello City Council. HRA. Planning
Commission, and other community leaders to hear the results of the housing plan as
presented by the Central Minnesota Housing Partnership.
.,
.J.
Working with the Central Minnesota Housing Partnership, the City of Monticello
submitted an application for funding to the Minnesota I-lousing Finance Agency. An
application were submitted in April 2001 and again, in September 2001. Both times the
application was denied.
4.
Although denied funding, the proposed low to moderate income, single-family, owner-
occupied housing and redevelopment project has proceed through the joint funding
efforts ofthc City. HRA. Sunny Fresh Foods. Inc. (employer contribution), CMHP, and
the Greater Minnesota Housing Agency. Groundbreaking anticipated by mid October,
2002.
2
.
.
.
5.
The City of Monticello Comprehensive Plan was amended in 2002 and one of the
housing goals remain: The City should monitor housing development in an effort to
provide a full range of housing choices.
SUGGESTED STRATEGIES
I. Provide the Planning Commission and City Council with a definition of the Fair Housing
Act as a means of promoting the Fair Housing Act.
2. Submit a summary of the HRA' s discussion on local housing issues to the Planning
Commission and City Council suggesting the continued monitoring of housing
development in an effort to provide a full range of housing choices. Are there any
deficieneies in housing choices?
3. Suggest the City Councilor Administration work directly with the Federal Agency from
which funding was received to determine if an affirmative action plan is required for the
City of Monticello.
"
.J
Jun 11 02 05:01p
Central MN Hcusin, Ptnsp
320 259-9590
W-.
p.2
.
Table DP-3. Profile of Selected Economic Characteristics: ZOoo
Geographic area: Monticello city, Minnesota
(Data based on a sample. For information on confidentiality protection. sampling error, nonsarnpling error, and definitions, see text]
Subject
*"
EMPLOYMENT STATUS
Population 16 yuns and over. . . . . . . . . .. .
In labor forca . .. .................,......,...
Civilian labor fon::e. . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
EmployOld . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . , .
Un8mployed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. . ..
Percent of civilian labor force. . . . . . . . . . . .
Armed Forces. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Not In laoor foroe. .. ... . . . . . . ...... ...........
Females 16 y<isns and over . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
In labor 10rce . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Civilian labor foree. . . . . . , , . , . , . . . . . . . . . . . .. .
Employed. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . .. . . . ...
OWn chlld.....n under 6 years. .. . . . . . . .. . . .
An parents in family in labor force . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
COMMUTING TO WORK
Wonc8f"5 16 years and over .. .. .. . .. .. . ..
Cat. tNCk, or van . - drove alone. . . . . . . . . . . . .. .
Car, truck. or van . . carpooled. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Public transportation (including taxicab) . . . . . . . ..
Walked. ...................................,
Other m88ns. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . .. . . ...
Worked at home . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
M....n travel lime to work (minutes)' ... . .. ... ...
.
Employed civilian population
16 years and over. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .
OCCUPATION
Managem8nt. professional. and related
occupations ,.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Service occupations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . , . .
Sales and offica occupations ...... . . . . , , . . . . . .
Farming. fishing, and for8Stry occupations.......
COIlstrudlOn, extr.'lction. and maintenance
oceupatlom; ....... ........................
Produdion. transportation. and material moving
occupations .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
INDUSTRY
Agriculture, forestry, fiShing and hunting,
and mining ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Construction. . . . . , . . . . . . . . , . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Manufacturing. . . . . . . . , . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Whole&ille trade. .. . , . , . . . . . .. . .. . . . . . .. . . .. . .
Retail trade . . . . . . . . . , . . , . . . , . . . . . . . . , , . . .. ...
Transportation and warehousing. and ulllili... . .. .
Information. . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . .
Finance. Insurance, real estate, and ren~ and
leasing. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . , . . . . . . . .
ProfElssional. scientific, management, admlnis-
tralive, and Wallie management services. . . . . . .
Educational. health and social sDl'llices ... . . . . ..
Arts. entertainment, recreation, accornmodallon
and food $f3l'Vices . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . .. . ...
Other 88rviQ8G (a_pt pl.Iblic adminisolion) ....
PUblic adminlstratJon. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , .. ...
CLASS OF WORKER
Private wage and salary workers. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Government worker.;:. . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . , . .
SeIf-ernployed workern in OWO not incorporated
business . . . . . . . . , . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . , . , . . . . . . .
Unpaid family workers . . . . . . , , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Number Percent
5,77:1
4,498
4,498
4,359
139
3.1
1,229
2.994
2. 174
2.174
2. 112
998
764
4,262
3,521
524
13
-48
28
128
2S.0
4,359
1,243
655
1,273
17
446
725
25 0.6
325 7.5
821 18.8
196 4.5
686 15.7
213 4.9
89 2..0
.
294 6.7
319 7.3
825 18.9
344 7.9
138 3.2
84 1.9
3.741 85.8
430 9.9
165 3.8
23 0.5
Subject
INCOME IN 1999
100.0 H_holds....... .............. ... .....
7B.5 LeS$ 1han $10.000. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . .. . .. . ,
78.5 $10,000 to $14.999.... .......... .............
76.1 $15,000 to 524,999. .. ... . ..... .. . .. . . .. .. . .. .
2.4 525,000 10 $34,999. .. . .. ..... ... . .. . . . .. . . .. .
(X) $35,000 10 549,999. ................ ..........
. $50,000 to 574,999. . . . .. .. . .. . .. . .. .. .. .. . .. .
21.5 $75,000 to 599,999. . , . . . . .. .. . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . .
100.0 $100.000 to $149,999. . ......, . . . . . . .. .. . ... ..
72.6 $150.000 to $1'89,999. . ....... .. . .. . .. .. . .. . ..
72.6 5200.000 or more. , . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .
70.5 Median hOU$8hold income (dollars). . . . . . . . . .. . .
100.0 With earnings. .. . .. . . . ... ..... .. . . .. . .. . .....
76.6 Mean earnings (doIlan;:)' .... .. .. . .. . .. . .. ...
With Social Security Incorne . .. . .. . . . . . . .. . .. . .
Mean Social Security Income (dollar.l)'
With Supplemental Security Income . . . . . . . . , . . .
Mean Supplemental SeClJrity Income
(dollars)' . .. . .. . .. .. .... .. .... .. . .. .. . .. ..
Wilh public assistance income. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
Mean public aS$islance income (dOllars)'
With retirement income....... . . . . .. . . . .. . .. . .
Mean retirement income (dollars)' . .. . .. . .. .. .
100.0
82.6
12.3
0.3
1.1
0.7
3.0
(X)
Families . .. . .. . . . .. .. . . . . .. . . . . . .. . .. . . .
Less 1han $10.000. . .. ... ..... .. . .. . .. . .. .....
100.0 510.000 to $14,999....... ....................
515.000 to $24,999.. . . ...... .. .. . .. . .. ... . .. .
$25.000 to $34.999. . , . . . . .. ., . , . . . . . . . . . . . .. .
28.5 535,000 to $49.999. .. . .. ... .. . .. . .. . .. .. .. . ..
15,0 550.000 to $74,999. .. .... .. .. ... . .. . .. , .. . .. .
29.2 575,000 to S99.999. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
0,4 $100.000 to $149,999.. .. ... .. .. . .. . .. ... .....
$150.000 to $199.999......... .. . .. . .. .. ... ...
10.2 5200,000 or more . . . . . .. .. .. . .. . . . . . . . .. . .. ..
Median farnily income (dollars). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
16.6
Psr capita income (doUalS)' .... .. . .. .. . .. . .. ..
Med~n NnrJngs (do/~rs):
Male full-time, year-round INClrkers. . . . . . . .. .....
Female full-time. year-round workers .. . . , . . . . ..
Number P8l'oent
2,977
113
170
317
449
592
739
382
195
10
10
45,384
2,628
51,461
544
10.167
86
7,066
128
2.150
333
10,537
2,122
31
73
187
299
35C
635
353
166
10
10
53.566
19.229
41,057
25,854
100.0
3.8-
5.7
10.6.
~>>-
24.8
12.8
6.6
0.3
0.3
(X)af
88.3
(X)
18.3
(Xl
2.9
(X)
4.3
(Xl
11.2
(Xl
100.0
1.5
3.4
8.8
14.1
16.8
29.9
16.6
7.9
0.5
0.5
(X) ~
(X)
(X)
(X)
Number Percent
below lMlow
poverty pol/erty
level level
89 4.2 '(J
65 4.6
39 6.0
43 13.1 f-
A.3 15.8
17 23.6
367 4,6
230 4.3
4S 7.4
121 4.8
85 5.0
117 9.2
.Repres8nts zero or rounds to ZenJ. (Xl Not lIflplicable.
'11 tho denominator of a mean value or per capilli value i. Iua 1han 30. tnen :nat value Is calculated using a rounded aggnlgate in tne numerator.
See ted.
Source: U S. Bureau of the Census. Census 2000.
.
u.s. Ccnsu!. 9uru",
Subject
POVeRTY STATUS IN 1t9t
Families . . . . .. .. . . . . .. . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .
With related children under 18 yeal'll. . . . . . . . . . ..
With related chiidren under 5 yearn. . . . . . . . . . .
Families with fltrna" ~oIcI... no
husband pnlsenl.......................
With related children under 18 yeers. . . . . . . . . . . .
Wi1h related children under 5 years...........
Individuals. . .. ..... ..... ... ... ...... ....
18 yealS and over. . . . .. . ..... . . . .. . .. . .. . ....
55 years and over. . .. .. ..... . . . . .. . .. . .....
Rlllatad children under 18 years...............
Related children 5 to 17 y_no . .. . . . . .. .. . .. .
Unrelated indiYlduels 15 y""l'!l and over. . . . . . . . .
3
Jun 11 02 05:01p
Central MN Housing Ptnsp
320 259-9590
H.
p.3
Table DP-4. Profile 01 Selected Housing Characteristics: 2000
Geographic a.rea: Monticello city. Minnesota
. [Data based on a sample. For information on confidentiality protection. sampling error, nonsampling error. and definitions. see text)
Subject
Total housing uni". . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . .
UNITS IN STRUCTURE
1.unit. detached, , , , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . , . . , . . . .
1-UI1il. artacned . . . , . . , . . , . . , . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . ,
2 units . . . . .. . , . .. . .. . . .... . . . . , . . . . .. . ..... .
3 or 4 unilll . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5 to 9 unita , .. . .. . .. .. . .. .. . . .. . .. . .. . . .... ..
10 to 19 units. . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. .. .
20 or mall! uniL$ . .. . .. . .. .. . . .. .. . .. ... . .. . ..
Mobile 1'\om8......,.... .......,.." .... ,.....
Scat, RV, van. ale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . , . . . . . . . . .
YEAR STRUCTURE BUILT
1999 10 March 2000 . . , . .. . ..... . h.. . ..... ...
1995 10 1998 ,.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. . .. .. .
1990 to 1994 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. , .. .. .
1980 to 1989 , ....,.',.......................
1970 10 1979 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... .. . '. . .. ... .. .
1960 to '969 . . .. .. .. . .. .. .. . . . .. . .. . .. .. .. . .
1940 to 1959 . ...... "........, ..... . ...., ,. .
1939 or earlier. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . , .. . . . . . .
.
ROOUS
1 room. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2 rooms. . , , . . , . . . . . . . . . . , .. , , , . . . , . . .. . .. . . .
3 rooms. , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . .. . . .
4 rooms. . . . . . . . .. . . . .. . .. .. . .. . . . . .. .. . .. . ..
5 rooms. . . , .. . .. .. . ... ... .. . .. . .. . . . .. ... .. .
6 rooms, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. . ..
7 rooms. .. . . .. .. .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . . . .. ... .. .
8 rooms......,...................".........
9 or more rooms , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Median (rooms) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Oc:c:upied housing units. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
YEAR HOUSEHOLDER MOVED INTO UNIT
1999 to March 2000 . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . .. . .. . .. . . .
1995 to 1998 . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . ..... . . . . . . ... .. .
1990 to 1994 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. , . .
1980 to 1989 . .. __ . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. _ .. .. .. . .
1970 to 1979 . . . . . . . .. . , . . . . .. . . , . . . . , . . .. . . .
1969 or earlier............... ................
VEHICLES AVAILABLE
None .......................................
1 .. . . , . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . __. __
2.......... ... ........,........... .... ......
3 or more. .. . . . . , . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . , .
HOUse HEATING FUEL
Utility gas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . , .
80med. tank, or LP gas. , . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
ElectriCity. . . . . . , , , , , , . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , , .
Fuel oil, kerosene. ete . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , , . . . . . .
Coal or coke... ......,............., .........
Wood. . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . , , . . .. .. . .
Solar energy. . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . , , . . . . .
Other fuel . , .. .. . .. , .. .. .. .. . .. . . . .. . .. .. . .. .
No fuel used. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . .
SELECTED CHARACTERlSl1CS
Lacking complete plumbing facilities, . . . . . . ,. . . .
Lacking complete kitchen facilities... ...........
No telephone service . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
-Repll!ssnlS zero or rounds to zero. (X) Not applicable.
Source: U.S. 8ureau of the Census, Census 2000.
.4
3,005
Numbolr Percent
1,771
347
33
112
53
185
294
210
222
678
351
798
418
130
186
222
26 0.9
90 3.0
240 8.0
529 17.6
480 16.0
390 13.0
524 17.4
386 12.8
340 11.3
5.9 (Xl
2.927 100.0
774 26.4
1,131 38.6
486 16.6
330 11.3
125 4.3
81 2.8
172
902
1,430
423
-
2.230
51
534
84-
.
. -
-
8
20
.
-
61
100.0
Subject
OCCUPANTS PER ROOM
Oce<.apled houalng WIlts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1.00 or less. . . . .. . .. . .. ... ... .. . .. . .. , .. . .. ..
1.01 10 1.50 .................. .. . . , . . . . . . . . . .
1,51 or more............,.......... .......".
58.9
11.5
1.1
3.7
1.8 Speclfl_ owmrr-oc:cupl_ Lln...... . .. . .
6.2 VALUE
9.8 LeG than $50,000. . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . .
7.0 550,000 to $99,999. .. . . . . .. . , . . . . . , . .. . .. . . . ,
- 5100,000 to 5149,999, .. . .. . .. .. . .. . . . .. , .. .. ,
5150.000 [05199,999............... .. ... .. . ,.
$200 .000 to 5299.999. . .. .. .. .. .. .. . . . .. . .. . . .
7.4 $300.000 to $499,999. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . ,. . ..
22.6 $500 ,000 to S999,999.. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. ..
11.7 $1.000,000 or moll!. .. . ..., . ., . .. . . .. .. . ... ...
26.6 Median (dollars). .. .. . . .. .. . . .. .. . . . . . . . .. . .. .
13.9
4.3
6.2
7.4
MORTGAGE STATUS AND SELECTED
MONTHLY OWNER COSTS
With a mortgage . .. .. .. .. .. . .. . .. .. . , . . .. .. ..
Less than $300 ... . .. . .. . . . . , . .. . . .. .. . . .
$300 to $499 . .. . .. .. . .. .. . .. .. .. . . .. .. . .
S500 to 5699 . .. . . . . .. .. .. . . .. . .. .. . . .. . .
$700 to $999 . .. . .. .. . .. . .. h.. .. .. . . .. . .
$1,000 to $1,499 , .. . ,. ..... ... . . . . .. , .. . ,
$1,500 to $1.999 . .. . h . .. .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . .
$2,000 or more .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Median (dollars)......... ......... ........
Not mortgaged. . .. . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . ... .. ,.,
Median (dollal1!ll. . . . .. . .. . .. . , . .. . .. . .. . . ,
SELECTED MONTHLY OWNER COSTS
AS A PERCENTAGE OF HOUSEHOLD
INCOME IN 1999
Less than 15,0 percent. ..,.,.",..,..... ... ...
15.0 to 19.9 percent. . , . . . , , . . . , . . . . . . . . . . , , . ,
20.0 10 24.9 P8lt:8Ot . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . , . . . , , , . , . ,
25.0 10 29.9 percant . . , . . . , , . , . . . . . . . . . , . , . . . .
30.0 to 34.9 percent. . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
35.0 percent or more . . . . . , . . , . . . . . . , , . . , . . . . .
Not computed. , , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . , . . , . . . . . . .
Speclfled renw-occuplttd units. .... . . .
5.9 GROSS RENT
30.8 Less than $200 . .. . . .. .. .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. .. ..
48.9 5200 ro 5299 .. . . .. .. _ .... .... .. ... . .. .......
14.5 5300 to $499 .. .. . .. . .. . .. . . .. .. . .. . .. .. .. .. _
5500 ro 5749 ........ ........................
5750 to $999 ,. . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
76.2 51,000 to $1,499 . .. . .. . .. .. h' . . .. ........ . ..
1.7 $1,500 or more .... ....... h... h............
18.2 No cash rent. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . .
2.9 Median (dollars), . . . , . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. .
- GROSS RENT AS A PERCENTAGE OF
. HOUSEHOLD INCOME IN 1999
0.3 Less than 15.0 pen:.ent. . . __ . . .. .. . . . . . . . . .. .. .
0,7 15,0 to 19,9 pen;ent..........................
20,0 to 24.9 percent. .. . .. . .. .. . .. . .. . .. .. . ...
25.0 to 29.9 p"rcant . .. . .. . .. . . . .. . .. . .. ... ...
. 30.0 to 34.9 percent. . . . .. . .. . . . .. . .. . .. . .. , . ,
_ 35.0 percent or more. . . . . . .. . .. . .. .. . . . .. . . . .
2.1 NOI computed. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . .
Number Perceru
2,927 100.0
2,822 96.4
77 2.6
28 1.0
1,810 100.0
6 0.3
262 14.5
1,026 56.7
370 20.4
121 6.7
16 0.9
. -
9 0.5
130,200 (X)
1.560 86.2
8 0.4
65 3.6
112 6.2
437 24,1
788 43.5
116 6.4
34 1.9
1,079 (X)
250 13.8
309 (X)
454 25.1
378 20.9
375 20.7
ZTO 14.9
116 6,4
217 12.0
. -
821 100.0
74 9.0
55 6.7
140 17,1
483 58 8
21 2.6
22 2.7
7 0.9
19 2.3
571 (X)
208 25,3
138 16.8
117 14.3
101 12.3
42 5.1
196 23.9
19 2.3
U4S. Cenl...fi Bureau