Loading...
IDC Agenda 01-04-2005• AGENDA -ANNUAL MEETING ~'n~ MONTICELLO INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE Tuesday, January 4, 2005 - 7:00 a.m. Community Center, 515 Walnut Street, Suite 1, Monticello, MN MEMBERS: hair Tom Lindquis Vice C air Dan Olso r Bar er i 1 Ta per 'ck Van Allen Tom O ig, Don Robert ike Benedetto; arb ientek, Kelli Huxford, il, Don T Klein STAFF: Rick Wolfsteller, Jeff O'Neill, Fred Patch, and Ollie oropchak. GUESTS: Invitation t Clint Herbst Tom Perrault, an Wayne ayer. ~r ~~ IDC MISSION STATEMENT: To maintain and increase the industria a and to create jobs in the City of Monticello, Minnesota. 7:00 a.m. 1. Call to Order. (Please read the minutes and information prior to the meeting.) ~i ~© 7:05 2. Vote to approve the December 7, 2004 and December 13, 2004 IDC minutes. Wh ~ `l~j~'G' 7:08 3. Follow-up and discussion of the City Council action to authorize a purchase agreement for acquisition of industrial land. noti '~~~ t ~ ~- A. Minutes of the December 7 Planning Commission and December 13 City Council meetings relative to approval of I-lA zoning and proposed covenants for 120 acres of Otter Creek Crossing. B. Plat recorded, closing on Otter Creek Crossing, and acquisition of 35-acres took place December 22, 2004. C. Update on December 9 Marketing meeting -Lynne Dahl and Dan Olson. D. IDC discussion on the benefits of I-1 A zone and proposed covenants and its relationship to the Preferred Measures. E. Summary discussions and follow-up. 7:40 4. City Update: A. Proposed I-94 and County Road 18 Interchange. 7:42 5. Reports: A. Economic Development Report - Koropchak. 7:45 6. Review the draft copy of the January 4, 2005 Planning Commission Agenda for industrial related items. Discuss and vote on an IDC position or action if necessary. tlo'C ~Rv 4 ; 1 c,. ~~ e. `` 8:00 7. Annual Meeting: A. Accep~ta~ce of IDC membership, three-year term -Lindquis Ollig, ~ d ~ , ~ Robert, and Dahl: "~'y '~d ~,~,`~` B. Request for Standing Committee Members: President or Chair of ~~,N''~ __E,~' Chamber and Mayor of Monticello. "~,~ • u IDC Agenda -January 4, 2005 C'r ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~- ~ ~'`''`- C Page 2 ~--~-- ~ ~~~ ~, ~:.. 8:20 8:30 Y~1 ~J ~.~ C. Vote to elect 20051DC Officers: Chair, Vice Chair, and Secretary. Review and vote to amend or re-affirm the IDC 2004 Action Statement and Organizational and Membership Guidelines• for 2005. ~ 8. Other Business. A. Chamber Updates - Feaski -Chamber Annual Fundraiser (Theat~r and Sil lei t Action), Friday, January 21, 2005, Community Center. ~o~ '~-~ B. Next IDC meeting -February 1, 2005. ~'J' ~' 9. Adjournment. C ~ 4 ~ Vl-ia a'.o~ ~'~- . • MINUTES MONTICELLO INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE Tuesday, December 7, 2004 - 7:00 a.m. WSI INDUSTRIES' LUNCH ROOM - 213 CHELSEA ROAD • MEMBER S PRESENT: Chair Tom Lindquist, Vice Chair Dan Olson, Mary Barger, Bill Tapper, Dick Van Allen, Don Roberts, Mike Benedetto, Tom Feaski, Lynne Dahl, and Paul Kleinwachter. MEMBERS ABSENT: Tom Ollig, Barb Schwientek, Kelli Huxford, and Don Tomann. COUNCIL LIAISON: Glen Posusta. STAFF: Ollie Koropchak. GUESTS: Jay Morrell, JME of Monticello and Steve Budd, IRTI. Mike Pudil, President and CEO, WSI Industries, Inc. IDC MISSION STATEMENT: To maintain and increase the industrial tax base and to create jobs in the City of Monticello, Minnesota. Call to Order. (Please read the minutes and information prior to the meetin,~ With the tardiness of the Chair, Vice Chair Olson called the IDC meeting to order at 7:07 a.m. declaring a quorum. 2. Vote to approve the October 28 2004 IDC minutes Bill Tapper made a motion to approve the October 28, 2004 IDC minutes. Seconded by Mary Barger and with no corrections or additions, the minutes were approved as written. 3. Follow-up and discussion of the City Council action to authorize a purchase agreement for acquisition of industrial land. A. Preliminary and Final Plat for Otter Creek Crossing_a proposed commercial and industrial subdivision in the B-4 and A-O districts was approved by the Council on November 22.2004. B Motion recommending zoning for 120 acre s of Otter Creek Business Campus (Attached recommendation from Small Industrial Group and HRA Planning Commission December 7 6.00 p m and City Council December 13 7.00 p m The IDC reviewed the recommendations of the HRA and Small Industrial Group who both recommended the 120 acres of Otter Creek Business Campus be re-zoned from A-0 to I-lA (Light Industrial District.) The permitted uses are the same in an I-1 and I-1 A zone with the major difference being the higher standard for exterior building materials in the I-lA Zone: Any exposed metal or steel finish on all buildings shall be limited to no more than 50%. Tapper noted he recalled a difference in the retail sales area allowed within industrial zones. It appeared the IDC supported the IDC Minutes - 12/7/2004 area allowed within industrial zones. It appeared the IDC supported the recommendation of the HRA and the Small Industrial Group; however, no official motion of recommendation was made by the IDC for re-zoning of the 120 acres of Otter Creek Business Campus from A-O to I-IA. C. Motion recommending covenants, for 120 acres of Otter Ci°eek Business Campus (Attached recommendation from Small Industrial Group and HRA) City Council December 13. 7:00 p.m. Koropchak noted the recommendations for covenants by the HRA and Small Industrial Group were consistent except the Small hldustrial Group's recommended defining outdoor/open storage as allowed. The recommendations included their repective reasons. Attached in the agenda was a copy of Planner Grittman's definition of outdoor storage and landscape irrigation. * Irrigation System -After some discussion on landscape irrigation, Bill Tapper made a motion recommending to require installation of an irrigation system from the front perimeter of the building and public right-of=way with the exemption of prairie grass. Dick Van Allen seconded the motion and with no further discussion, the motion carried * Outdoor/open storage -Small Group representatives Barger and Van Allen mis- interrupted the definition of out-door storage as written by Grittman. Once it was determined that items a.- e. were not considered out-door storage, the IDC discussed each item. Items c, d, and e received the most attention with some deletions within Items c and d and to look at Item e for further detail. After some further discussion, Don Roberts made a motion: No Outdoor Storage Allowed On all lots, no owner, tenant, or other occupant shall store materials, equipment, or items outside of any building. The following exceptions are not to be considered storage, and may be located outside in compliance with other applicable regulations: a. Parking ofpassenger vehicles and light trucks, parked in compliance with the City of Monticello zoning regulations. b. Parking of company vehicles, including trucks, vans, and other similar vehicles, with the exception ofsemi-truck rigs which are subject to separate regulations. c. Semi-truck tractors and trailer rigs when such tractors and trailer rigs are parking in the side and rear yard. d Semi-truck trailers located in designated loading docks. e. Trash Handling equipment. Dick Van Allen seconded the motion and with no further discussion, the motion carried. * No metal or steel exterior building materials allowed -The Small Group and HRA both recommended no metal or steel exterior building materials. Barger expressed her point that the difference between the assessed value of a metal building verus a masonry building and its application to the Preferred Measures. Concluding that the Preferred Measures encourage masonry buildings; therefore, the existing zone allows flexibility. Koropchak noted if no recommendation is made, the 50% other than metal exterior material requirement within the I1-A Zone would be the recommendation. No official recommendation was made by the IDC. 2 1DC Minutes - 12/7/2004 * Landscaping - No official action for recommendation was made by the IDC. D. Preferred Measures -Presentation to Council December 13 6.00 p m The Preferred Measures will be presented to the City Council and Council-elect on December 13, 6:00 p.m. as a means of education and support. The package deal only works if there is consistency and support for the Preferred Measures, zoning, and covenants among staff, Council, and Planning . The package deal is offered to foster a higher quality business campus. The Preferred Measures are as follows: 8full-time equivalent jobs/acres, wages at least $16.00 per hour excluding benefits, l acre to 25% building ratio, and new market value of $435,600 per acre. E. Closing and purchase of 35 acres scheduled for December 9 or 10 2004 F. Marketing Committee meeting scheduled for December 9 2004 7.30 a m Appoint one new IDC representative. Koropchak noted that Tom Ollig resigned from the Marketing Subcommittee and requested a replacement. Koropchak suggested Dan Olson and Olson agreed. 4. City Update: A. Mayor and Council-Elect have been goin though orientation and tour of the cites No updates given. 5. Reports: A. Economic Development Report -Written. 6. Review the draft copy of the December 7 2004 Planning Commission Agenda for industrial related items. Discuss and vote on an IDC position or action if necessary A. Continued Public Hearing -Consideration of an amendment to the Monticello Zoning Ordinance allowing Open and Outdoor Storage Applicant• City of Monticello (See attached letter.) Jay Morrell, JME, updated the IDC members of his concerns relative to the proposed amending of the ordinance allowing open and outdoor storage in an existing I-2 and I-1 zone. Due to the fact, the Recorder stepped out to inform those waiting for the tour, no minutes were recorded. Steve Budd, IRTI, was also present. B. Motion a ointin~ an IDC member to the Ad Hoc Subcommittee Mary Barger agreed to volunteer as the IDC representative to the Ad Hoc Subcommittee for discussion to consider amending the above ordinance. 7. Other Business. A. Chamber Updates - No updates. B. IDC Annual meeting Tuesday January 4 2004 IDC members whose term expires December 2004: Tom Lindquist, Tom Ollig, Don Roberts, and Lynne Dahl. Election of Officers for 2005. r1 ~J IDC Minutes -12/7/2004 Adiournment. At 8:20 a.m. the IDC members broke for a tour of WSI, Inc. with guides Mike Pudil and Paul Sheeley. The IDC meeting reconvened following the tour with a handful of members; therefore, the minutes may be written out of sequence. Adjournment approximately 10:15 a.m. ~~U~ Recorder s ~i 4 RECOMMENDATIONS • Approved December 7, 2004 BY THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE (IDC) for OTTER CREEK BUSINESS CAMPUS 1. RECOMMENDATION TO RE-ZONE THE 120 ACRES OF OTTER CREEK BUSINESS CAMPUS FROMA-O TO I-lA (Light Industrial District) 2. RECOMMENDATION TO ESTABLISH THE FOLLOWING COVENANTS FOR OTTER CREEKBUSINESS CAMPUS. A. Require installation of an irrigation system with the exemption of prairie grass. Landscaping Irrigation Required: On all lots on which a building is proposed to be constructed, the owner shall, prior to occupancy of said building, install, or cause to be installed, in-ground landscaping irrigation between the front building line and the public street. This requirement shall also apply to the side lot areas of corner lots which face a different street. In the case of rear lot areas that front on a public street, the owner shall install, or cause to be install, landscaping irrigation for all landscaped areas within 50 feet of said public street. Irrigation required by this restrictive covenant shall provide adequate irrigation water to all landscaped areas, including lawns, shrubs, tress, flower beds, or other similar features. This requirement also applies to the "boulevard" portion of the public right of way between the owner's property line and the curb line of the public street. B. No outdoor storage allowed. On all lots, no owner, tenant, or other occupant shall store materials, equipment, or items outside of any building. The following exceptions are not to be considered storage, and may be located outside in compliance with other applicable regulations: a. Parking of passenger vehicles and light trucks, parked in compliance with the City of Monticello zoning regulations. b. Parking of company vehicles, including trucks, vans, and other similar vehicles, with the exception of semi-truck rigs which are subject to separate regulations. c. Semi-truck tractors and trailer rigs when such tractors and trailer rigs are parking in the side and rear yard. d. Semi-truck trailers located in designated loading docks. e. Trash Handling equipment. 3. RECOMMENDATION TO RETAIN THE DESIGNAND SITE PLAN STANDARDS, ~BJ Building Type and Construction and Roof as required within the I-lA Light Industrial District. 4. RECOMMENDATION TO RETAIN THE EXISTING LANDSCAPING ORDINANCE. Reason for zoning recommendation: I-lA Zone is consistent with Monticello Commerce Center zone. (UMC, TCDC, Suburban area.) U MINUTES SPECIAL MEETING MONTICELLO INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE Monday, December 13, 7:00 a.m. City Hall -Academy Room MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Tom Lindquist, Vice Chair Dan Olson, Dick Van Allen, Mary Barger, Lynne Dahl, Bill Tapper, and Paul Kleinwachter. Vice Chair Olson said he called the special IDC meeting as he felt members left the December 7`" meeting confused about the recommendations and noted that the Otter Creek re-zoning and covenants are on the Council agenda of December 13. Otter Creek is the number-one mission of the IDC and we need some clarification. Olson had contacted all IDC members, some of which he left a message. Chair Lindquist called the IDC meeting to order at 7:00 a.m. Koropchak presented the members with a copy of the IDC recommendations (reviewed by Barger) which were submitted as supporting data in the Planning and Council agendas. The Planning Commission on December 7 approved the re-zone of the 120-acres of Otter Creek Business Campus from A-O to I-lA . Olson said he became more aware of the need to send a clear message to the Council supporting higher quality standards for Otter Creek. He said that message became evident at the Marketing Subcommittee. Koropchak explained, Item 3 of the covenant recommendations meant by not making a recommendation, it was interrupted the IDC supported the 50% other than metal exterior building material as defined within the I1-A Standards of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance. Members did not remember any formal action taken on the December 7`" and one thought the IDC was going to look into this further. Koropchak informed the IDC members that the minutes of December 7t" were not prepared. Upon continued discussions relative to the purchase cost of metal/steel today and the long-term value and benefits of masonry, Bill Tapper made a motion recommending to allow no metal or steel exterior sidewall building materials with the exception of architectural panels not-to-exceed 10%. Dick Ilan Allen seconded the motion, further noting that the majority of the IDC members would support this recommendation. Motion carried. The members then discussed the nature of the truck traffic created by ready-mix trucks, the value of the YMCA land for housing development, the economics of relocating the ready-mix plant from the perspective on the Council and Council-elect, and the need for consistent planning. Kleinwachter noted the IDC needs to send the right message and a clear message to Council that the City has the opportunity to do a higher standard business park and to do it right. The members re-affirmed their recommendation to re-zone the 120 acres of Otter Creek Business Campus from A-O to I-lA (Light Industrial District) and further suggested no re-zone from I-lA to I-2 (Heavy Industrial.) IDC Minutes -12/13/04 The IDC members suggested inviting the Council and Council-elect to the next IDC meeting on Tuesday, January 4, 2005. The special IDC meeting adjourned by a census. Ul ~ C/~' Recorder 1 • 2 RECOMMENDATIONS • Approved December 7, 2004 Clarified December 13, 2004 BY THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE (IDC) for OTTER CREEK BUSINESS CAMPUS 1. RECOMMENDATION TO RE-ZONE THE 120 ACRES OF OTTER CREEK BUSINESS CAMPUS FROMA-O TO I-IA (Light Industrial District) 2. RECOMMENDATION TO ESTABLISH THE FOLLOWING COVENANTS FOR OTTER CREEK BUSINESS CAMPUS. A. Require installation of an irrigation system with the exemption of prairie grass. Landscaping Irrigation Required: On all lots on which a building is proposed to be constructed, the owner shall, prior to occupancy of said building, install, or cause to be installed, in-ground landscaping irrigation between the front building line and the public street. This requirement shall also apply to the side lot areas of corner lots which face a different street. In the case of rear lot areas that front on a public street, the owner shall install, or cause to be install, landscaping irrigation for all landscaped areas within 50 feet of said public street. Irrigation required by this restrictive covenant shall provide adequate irrigation water to all landscaped areas, including lawns, shrubs, tress, flower beds, or other similar features. This requirement also applies to the "boulevard" portion of the public right of way between the owner's property line and the curb line of the public street. B. No outdoor storage allowed On all lots, no owner, tenant, or other occupant shall store materials, equipment, or items outside of any building. The following exceptions are not to be considered storage, and may be located outside in compliance with other applicable regulations: a. Parking of passenger vehicles and light trucks, parked in compliance with the City of Monticello zoning regulations. b. Parking of company vehicles, including trucks, vans, and other similar vehicles, with the exception of semi-truck rigs which are subject to separate regulations. c. Semi-truck tractors and trailer rigs when such tractors and trailer rigs are parking in the side and rear yard. d. Semi-truck trailers located in designated loading docks. e. Trash Handling equipment. 3. RECOMMENDATION TO ALLOW NO METAL OR STEEL EXTERIOR • SIDEWALL BUILDING MATERIALS WITH THE EXCEPTION OF ARCHITECTURAL PANELS NOT-TO-EXCEED 10%. 4. RECOMMENDATION TO RETAIN THE EXISTING LANDSCAPING ORDINANCE. Reason for zoning recommendation: I-1 A Zone is consistent with Monticello Commerce Center zone. (UMC, TCDC, Suburban area.) No re-zoning from I-lA to I-2: Value of YMCA land for housing, consistency with surrounding communities, industrial park with higher quality, sets tone, next users??? l~ Council Minutes - 12/13/04 ~• W[TII GLEN POSUSTA VOTING IN OPPOSI"LION. I0. Consideration of au_thorizina AVAR utility studies and inte-°changc analysis for Herita«c llevelonment (Silver Springs Golf Course) Sub-items A B C' Approved with consent agenda. 11. Consideration to approve a rezone of Otter Creek Business Campus (Outlot H Outlot F Outlot B and Lot I, Block 2 of Otter Creel: Crossing from A-O (Agricultural/O ~cn Spaced to Il-A (L-~ht Industrial~pplicant• City of Monticello Otter Creels LLC The proposed rezoning would bring the City land into the I-lA zoning designation. It was noted that the rezoning applied only to the City owned land and did impact the land adjacent to the freeway which was previously rezoned to B-4 or Outlot F which would retain the AO classification. Bruce Thielen summarized discussion held by the Council at the workshop as it related to the rezoning of the Otter Creek plat. Part of the discussion centered around whether the industrial park could be considered as relocation site for the AVR Redi-mix plant and whether that use would be compatible with the IDC intended uses in the industrial park. Noting the position of the IDC, the Council felt there had to be some flexibility with the AVR relocation. When a decision is made on the AVR site, if it is to be relocated to the industrial park thei°e would a separate rezoning done but it would not need not be done at this time. Robbie Smith stated that although no rezoning was being done at this time to accommodate the possible relocation of the AVR Redi-mix plant to that site, IDC and others should understand that there could be a rezoning to I-2 in the future. BRIAN STUMPF MOVED TO APPROVE THE REZONING TO I-lA FOR OUTLOT H, OUTLOT E, OUTLOT B AND LOT 1, BLOCK 2 OF OTTER CREEK CROSSING BASED ON A FINDING THAT THIS DISTRICT IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE CITY'S LAND USE PLAN AND WOULD BE BEST SUITED TO FULFILL THE CITY'S INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES AND WITH THE POSSIBILITY EXISTING THAT A PORTION COULD BE REZONED IN THE FUTURE TO I-2 AS A POSSIBLE RELOCATION SITE FOR AVR REDI-MIX. GLEN POSUSTA SECONDED TIDE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 12. Consideration to authorize the City Attorney tod~repare appropriate documents for Otter Creel: Business Campus covenants As part of this item_ John Chadwick spoke to the Council about a few items remaining on the land acquisition. He noted the easement questions had been squared away. Sewer and water being brought to serve Outlot F is still a question. He would like to have sewer and water extended to the site with 18-24 months. John Chad~~ ick said the City could charge him interest from the day the pipe arrived and added that the agreement does not provide for them to pay interest. 10 Council Minutes - 12/l x/04 ~ • The alignment of pipe to serve this area was discussed. Glen Posusta stated that it appeared that the land could be serviced from the 90'x' Street line. Bret Weiss stated the lift station is going to be closer to County Road 39 than it is to this property. The question is who extends the pipe to the property line and who pays fir it. The City would have to upfront the cost of extending the line through a large area to get it to his property. Glen Posusta asked where School Boulevard hits 90''' Street. Bret Weiss indicated it was just before the Bondhus development. Glen Posusta questioned the time frame for serving annexed property. Rick Wolfsteller stated that if utilities are brought to the property line that meets the qualifications in the orderly annexation agreement. Rick Wolfsteller noted that these issues which are being brought up now were not part of the original purchase agreement and should not be part of the closing process. Rick Wolfsteller didn't feel this was any different than. the City requi~°ing the easements. Rick Wolfsteller stated the City has provided service when property owners have agreed to pay for it but he questioned whether the City should extend service lines without compensation. Bret Weiss stated a possible route to serve the property would be along the power line easement. Bret Weiss felt there could be a separate agreement prepared that would cover the issue of extension of service to the site and how it would be paid for. John Chadwick suggested striking the 24 month clause from the agreement and everything relating to extension of service. This will not be addressed as part of closing but will be covered in another agreement. BRIAN STUMPF MOVED TO DIRECT THE CITY ATTORNEY TO PREPARE RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS FOR RECORDING FOR THE CITY'S PORTION OF OTTER CREEK CROSSING RELATING TO: A) PROHIBITION AND DEFINITION OF OUTDOOR STORAGE, WITH ALLOWANCES FOR VEHICLE PARKING, TRASH HANDLING AND TRUCKING ACTIVITIES PER IDC RECOMMENDATION; B) REQUIREMENT FOR IRRIGATION OF LANDSCAPING AREAS BETWEEN THE BUILDING LINE AND THE STREET PER IDC RECOMMENDATION; C) PROHIBITION OF METAL EXTERIOR BUILDING MATERIALS WITH EXCEPTIONS FOR ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENTS ON ROOFS, DOORS, WINDOWS, OR SIMILAR ELEMENTS. GLEN POSUSTA SECONDED TIDE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 13. Consideration of a nreliminary plat and conditional use permit for develoa~ment stage planned unit development foi° 47 65 acre commercial/retail development Applicant Ryan Companies. The Planning Commission reviewed the preliminary plat and conditional use permit for Ryan Companies at their December 6, 2004 meeting and recommended approval with a number of conditions. According to Jeff O'Neill most of the conditions noted have been resolved. One of the items remaining is Outlot D which is at the enhance into the development and its proposed use. It could be considered as public space and it is located along the pathway syste~ii. The question is who is responsible for Iaaying for improvements related io it and who is responsible for maintaining it. Jeff O'Neill suggested the developer could provide fw~ds for the City for improvements to the Outlot D in exchange for a larger pylon sign. The Council Planning Commission Minutes 12/07/04 Hearing no further comments, Chairman Frie closed the public hearing. Frie asked what would eventually be adjacent to this property, in order to address landscaping and berming requirements. Grittman indicted that the current guide plan actually calls for residential development. As such, it would require significant buffering as outlined by the ordinance. Frie asked if when the comp plan was approved, it allowed for residential in this area. O'Neill indicated that a concept stage PUD plan had been approved allowing the residential use. O'Neill noted that along the YMCA property and other land to the south, there is a grade change that creates a natural separation. Frie asked if Chelsea Road would be completed as a part of the project. O'Neill stated that the finance plan in progress with the original landowner stipulates an arrangement of payment for construction of Chelsea. Frie asked Koropchak to review the IDCs recommendations. Koropchak referred to the three point outlined by the IDC. Koropchak stressed that the covenants recommended apply only to the Otter Creek parcel. Site plan and landscape standards would be as in current I-1 A zoning designation. Posusta addressed the outdoor storage issue, stating that he believes the recommendations are too restrictive. Koropchak explained that the Small Group Committee of the IDC had made the recommendation after defining what outdoor storage was. Koropchak reminded the Commission again that what has been proposed is only for Otter Creek Business Campus and will not be mixed with other industrial areas. Frie asked Grittman and Koropchak if TIF and HRA money would be going to this project and if so, are the covenants being proposed to support or justify these funds. Koropchak stated that a TIF district will be created that will pay the City back the cost of putting the improvements in. In exchange, prospective companies have to meet a certain standard. The package that the City has put together is attractive enough for the City to ask for something in return. Koropchak stated that she believes the standards and preferred measures have been drafted in such a way as to create a business park that the community can be proud o£ Frie asked for the general attitude of the HRA's input. Koropchak stated that the basic difference was the no outdoor storage requirement. Koropchak indicated that the HRA is also more knowledgeable about the application of tax increment financing and has researched surrounding communities in developing their standards. Posusta commented that AVR is looking at the southwest corner of the Otter Creek site for relocation purposes as part of the interchange project. Posusta noted that AVR is a heavy industrial use and he is concerned about the impacts of rezoning on this possibility. Grittman explained that when the interchange project happens, the City may identify this site as one possible site among others for relocation. If this is the chosen site, the City can review rezoning a smaller portion at that time. Grittman stated that the ,, -,,- Planning Commission Minutes 12/07/04 O'Neill referred to the public comment letter submitted to the Commission by Jay Morrell, which recommends the formation of a representative committee to review the Open and Outdoor Storage language in the ordinance. O'Neill stated that staff supports the recommendation. Frie asked if the Planning Commission and Council would have any representation and if there was a Council member already assigned to the committee. Posusta referred to Jay Morrell's letter which specifically requests Council representation. Posusta stated that a committee to develop a recommendation on possible ordinance amendments had been the consensus of the IDC, as well. Chairman Frie opened the public hearing. Jay Morrell, JME Enterprises of Monticello, addressed the Commission. Morrell indicated that he had attended the IDC meeting. It seemed that the IDC is in agreement that a committee should be formed to review what is current and what should be recommended in terms of an amendment. Morrell stated that he had spoken with a number of representatives from local industries who support the idea of sitting down to have an open discussion on concerns and how can we resolve them, while still maintaining outdoor storage. Frie stated that he would like to see the industrial group develop their own recommendations, as that could be more productive. The Commission would seek a reasonable amendment that is workable for all parties. Frie stated that he would seek a recommendation from the group by the February Commission meeting. Morrell noted that there is a need for input from staff, so that the group can address their specific issues. In the interim, businesses may carry on under the existing ordinance. Frie asked Grittman to clarify the process after the committee provides the Commission with a recommendation. Grittman stated that assuming that modification to the code is needed, staff will draft new language, a public hearing notice will be issued, the item will be heard at the Commission, and then a recommendation will proceed to Council. Frie asked if Morrell and Steve Budd, also present and representative of the industrial community, were willing to serve on the committee. Budd and Morrell stated that they would be. Carlson noted that the public hearing will involve the input of larger community, not just the industrial sector. Hearing no further comment, Chairman Frie closed the public hearing. MOTION BY COMMISSSIONER FRIE TO RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL THE FORMATION OF A COMMITTTE TO ESTABLISH A RECOMMENDATION FOR AN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT ON OPEN AND OUTDOOR STORAGE, TO BE HEARD AT THE FEBRUARY MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION. THE COMMITTEE SHOULD CONSIST OF MONTICELLO BUSINESS OWNERS December I ~ ~ ~ 0, _00~ MONTICELLO Mr. Kenneth E. Stabler Xcel Energy 4l4 Nicollet Mall, ~`'' Floor Minneapolis, MN ~~401 Re: Industrial Development Partnership Dear Mr. Stabler: The City of Monticello has a Purchase Agreement to acquire l20 acres of land for industrial development. The site, Otter Creek Business Campus, is located to the south off-9~1 and west of Trunk Flighway 2~ and is served by Xcel Energy. Construction of road and utility improvements will commence in spring 200 with a scheduled fall completion. The Marketing Subcommittee made up of members of the Monticello Inds-strial Development Committee and the Housing and Redevelopment Authority have prepared a Marketing Plan. For the first time, the Subcommittee can market a tangible product (land) in addition to Nlonticello's location and amenities. The strategy is to create a brand, to keep the essage simple, and to be repetitive. The plan includes ads in a manufacturing journal and classified ads in the Wall ~treet Journal and Star Tribune, design and distribution of direct mail post cards, rental space at trade shows, lease of brllboards along I-94 and Highway 169./10, redesign of city industrial website, update of city brochure inserts, and hosting local promotional events. The total cost of the marketing plan is approximately $36,000 (see attached budget.) The Marketing Subcommittee would like to partner with Xcel Energy and is asking Xcel Energy for $1 x,000 to help defray design, set-up. artwork, print, distribution, and other costs associated with the Marketing Plan. In addition to the Marketing Plan, preferred measures, a Light Industrial Zone, and covenants are proposed for the Otter Creek Business Campus supporting the investments made by Xcel Energy and the City of Monticello. The Marketing Subcommittee is very optimistic that our efforts will be successful and spur growth which is positive for both Xcel Energy and the City. For additional information relating to the request, please call me at 763-271-3208. Thank you for consideration to partner with the City of Monticello. Sincerely, CITY OF MONTICELLO Ollie Koropchal<. ;conomic Development Director Attachment Monticello City Hill, 505 Walnut Street, Suite I, Monticello, MN 55362-8831. • (763) 295-271 f • Fax. (763) 295-4404 Office of Public Works, 909 Golf Course Rd., Monticello, MN 55362 • (763) 295-3170 • Fax: (763) 271-3272 ~~rrw ~7 /l~re,Energy~M Northern States tr ~ "'" Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ~s ~ Hospital Drive \ ~s ccn UaDo3775Vo d/ttla Xcel Ene gy „ a V an Wert 4H 45891\~ 414 Nicollet Mall , ,~or~ 56-382 _ Minneapolis, MN 55401 3os-62~z6aa Date 12 / 1.8 / 04 it2 9600'Q19'921 • $7500.00 U5D Pay SEVEN THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED & 00/100************************ DOLLARS VOID. IF NOT CASHED IN 90' DAYS To The Order. CITY OE' MONTICELLO ©f 505 WALNUT STREET SUITE 1 yIONTICELLO MN 55362 ~ Zj, \1'`~ _ a ra, r r' r- -r ~ r ~ ' r ~ a a ~ ~. 11'0000377 56011' i:04L203B24~:960001992~11' Payee CITY OF MONTICELI.O Vendor ID Employee # CITYMONTIC 01 Payment Ref Invoice No. PO/Contract 927907100000 121004 Pymt Comments: Marketing Plan Attn: 011ie Koropchak Monticello City Hall Check No. 0000377560 Disc/Wth .00 Date 12/18/04 Pay Amount $7500.00 * 000017 220596 IMPACT OF RE-ZONE TO I-2 (Heavy Industrial) Annual loss in wages - $1,946,880 Annual loss in taxes - $96,000 Cost of land, improvements and trunk fees - $1,259,820 The 7.5 million dollar investment of tax payers money was based on cash flows using at least 50,000 building per five acres. Return on investment and one Council member suggested we not just break even but have return for future investment. I-2 Zone (Heavy Industrial) Isolated from residential and commercial. Long range planning -Otter Creek Business Campus will be near center of city in the future. To South is R-1, to southwest is R-lA, and west current green space with potential re-zone in the future to residential (value of this land for high-end housing). Noise and dust. Truck Traffic: Proposed 150 daily (6 days a week, 6:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., sometimes longer) Types of truck include cement and belli trucks, the most undesired type of truck traffic (dirty) Impact to the neighboring areas: both residential and commercial. ~et tone for uses in Otter Creek Business Campus. (Reduce standards in Preferred Measure) Must have form of consistency. I-2 zone a City without a planned future (smoke stack versus high tech) Developers drive land uses (other examples Heritage and Gold Nugget) Driven by city obligation to relocate AVR (City buy-out and assist in finding alternative sites) Driven by interchange time frame (last minute) No previous plans. City Engineer Consultant doing negotiations not city staff. (Not invited to meeting with AVR and told Heritage mixed-use would be a nice park) Driven by interchange financing -Suggested re-zone of I-lA south of Chelsea Road to commercial. Not consistent with City Staff, HRA and IDC purpose to acquire land for development of a quality business park. Want to do it right? C] Page 1 of 1 Ollie Koropchak _ _ ~ _ ~ From: Ed Sorgatz [esorgatz@olsongc.com] Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2004 2:54 PM To: Ollie Koropchak Subject: Monticello Industrial Park Hi Ollie -------- After our visit I stopped by to say hello to Shawn Weinand. During the course of our visit, I asked him, "If you owned the proposed City Industrial Park, how would you deal with the question of whether or not the Readi Mix plant should be included within the Park". He responded that he definitely would not mix heavy industrial with light industrial for the same reasons we discussed. 1. It would have a major impact on the type of business you can attract to the park and ultimately significantly reduce the overall tax base of the park. 2. The problem created by the related trucking tied to the Readi Mix plant would not only affect neighboring businesses but also every other business up and down the road all the way out to highway 25. He indicated that at one point in time the nursery property south of town had been targeted as a relocation site for the Readi Mix plant. Apparently, the property could be acquired for far less than the developed cost of the Ind. Park, plus it is on the outskirts of town, has good access to 25 and also has a mining permit which could be attractive to the Readi Mix owners. He said he envisioned joining this with a neighboring parcel and creating both a home for Readi Mix as well as a Heavy Industrial park for other like users. He indicated that this property is now back on the market after having been sold earlier. This sounds like an ideal solution. I have learned over time that in business, the people who are successful at what they do, whatever the field, are generally good resources and worth listening too in areas in which they are knowledgeable. I personally don't know anyone any more knowledgeable than Shawn with regards to real estate development and would regard his input as worthy of consideration I don't mean to meddle in your business, but it sounded like you could use some help in supporting your position on this matter. Good to see you again. Ed Sorgatz 12/16/2004 p ._. n ,~ - ~ ~ • _ ~ s ~ ~~. ~,Mti ~ p ~ ~w ~' ' ~ ~ ^~~.ri ~i F r ~ ~ r ~ ' j: A ~/ I K~YV..,J.,:A. 1 ~" ~(. ~. X111/_'. ° "~f / ~ Sys , • '~'.~~ ~ i ~ r, ~;: ~ .,, I ~~ ~ ; ,,t ' 4. z ~a .:?,. ~ ~ a y T ~, ~. ..y .. = _ {{{ 1 ~ ; 4 n. - ; $ O k ~. ., • .~ .,, _ 4_ ~. .: ~.,,c4 ,'S.~ 'C~ ~w~ ~ ,~, .~{ ~~ 13 ~~ .. t4n ~ ...F'~ "r -j ~A{ N `^J41/'_ ~w~vtm'j Q V t .. ,• ,s ~~ a '~ , I ~-I ' .~yy~ax ` _ ~ lY x - ~/ "': • MO.~TI'ICELLO LONG ~V`G.E L~9[~"Vl3 L~T~.,~ '~; Low Oensiky Retldential { Expansbn Area .__ Low oe rnitY Reskierrtia! (R-1) Future Lind Use Qbjectives: .- __ ---, ~ ~ Low Denaky Rasiderrtial (R-1A) Medium Density (attached Mp.) ~ ~ I~Ow ~' a !?HNC C'/ ~/!iI Yii>~ Urban Mixed-Use pi~illVae •ltd I?~'tJl ~ l~ * Plbv~s C"~'d ~ ~ jQM'~ Comrnerciai Rvitttht r~nri c>harser~r sisal a arhnrtl~ lawn i~iM C inciwlrtal ~ iR/!~/1C! O 8 pen pe~ ! dYY~j,,..~.~~ ~;; ~ Mobge Home Park `~ ~~ __ . , IDC Agenda - 01/04/05 ~ `~~ v ~ SA. Economic Development Report .~ a) Industrial Leads - S~~'~~ * 28,000 sq ft manufacturing facility -The company abandoned their site search in Hanover. Search re-opened to Big Lake, Monticello, and Elk River. Rubber products and rubber coated rollers. 25 jobs currently and estimate 20 new jobs within two years. Tour date December 21, 3:00 p.m. Unable to attend. • 20,000 sq ft manufacturing facility -looking to purchase existing buildin or acrea e f g g or future multi-use building. • 30,000 sq ft assembly and distribution facility with expansion up to 50 000 s ft - , q looking to build, 6 full-time employees, another 6 in two years. • 30,000-50,000 sq ft manufacturer of high-tech pumps, 3 full-time, another 7-15 in two years. • 15,000-20,000 sq ft heavy industrial zone -request 3-5 acres, out-door storage required for large pieces of equipment, 80 construction professionals. • Proposed 3 buildings of 8,000 to 13,000 sq ft each. Condo for sale or lease of 3,300 sq ft bays. Spring construction. Purchased lot from Ron and Dee Johnson next to ' `' ° }~ ~ ~ Polycast Specialities along Dundas Road. to , nu ~ - ~ a~ °-'P • Corner lot of Chelsea Road and Fallon Avenue sold for proposed wholesale home Liz ~ t 3 ~`"'~' "~~ ~~ ~ ' construction materials such as carpet, etc. '` ' b) Business and retention expansions • Suburban expansion -report from Mary Barger. 09` ""''"'~ ~`~~ Sunny Fresh -report from Don Roberts ~r~n..~-~°~-= h. Dahlheimer proposal -will report status at meeting. One manufacturer planning to expand by 10,000 sq ft in 2005. oyQ~.. ~ Another manufacturer planning an addition or relocation to business campus in 2005. ~°"~' Another manufacturer discussing long range plans. Another industrial business looking at an addition for possible lease. c) After the Chamber meeting in December, I spoke with Ed Sorgatz, Olson General Contractors, who constructed UMC and TCDC about his thoughts for a Heavy Industrial Use in Monticello or Otter Creek Business Campus. He did some additional research. See attachment 3D. d) UMC - I stopped by UMC to talk with Don Tomann. One to check on his and his father's recovery process and to check on their future plans. Don plans to attend the January IDC meeting. e) Marketing Committee met in December. Developed a marketing plan and budget. Requested $15,000 from Xcel Energy. Received $7,500 in 2004 and the other $7,500 forthcoming in 2005. See attachment 3C. f) Monticello Transformation Home Loan Program to be unveiled in January. g) Met with developer interested in purchase of Broadway theater building and possible redevelopment. h) Barry Fluth's Phase II redevelopment project proposed to move forward in 2005. IDC Agenda - 01./04/05 i) Semi-annual TIF payments ready for disbursement the 1 sr of February, 2005. j) Wright County Economic Development Partnership Annual Meeting, Friday, January 21, 7:45 a.m., Silver Springs Golf Course. Koropchak ends 2004 year as Chair and Nod Nikula,Wright-Hennepin Electric becomes Chair 2005. Guest speaker: Chris Berghoff, Entrepreneur of the Year Award Recipient. • CJ AGENDA REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION TUESDAY, JANURY 4TH, 2004 6:00 P.M Commissioners: Dick Frie, Richard Carlson, Rod Dragsten, Lloyd Hilgart, and William Spartz Council Liaison: Glen Posusta Staff: Jeff O'Neill, Fred Patch, Steve Grittman - NAC, and Angela Schumann Call to order. 2. Approval of the minutes of the regular Planning Commission meeting held Monday, December 7th, 2004. 3. Consideration of adding items to the agenda. 4. Citizen comments. 5, Public Hearmb Consideration of a request for rezoning from A-O (Agricultural- Open Space) to R-1 (Single-Family Residential) and a request for Preliminary Plat for Club West, an approximately 5 acre, 12-unit residential development. Applicant: Back Nine, LLC 6. Consideration of expiration of current term Planning Commissioners and recommendation to the City Council of appointment or reappointment of Commissioners. 7. Discussion Item -Summary of pending projects. 8. Adjourn. LJ • IDC MEMBERSHIP 2004 VOTING MEMBERS TERM December 2004 December 2005 December 2006 ME_ Tom Lindquist Tom Ollig Don Roberts Lynne Dahl Standing Member NON-VOTING MEMBERS City Council Liaison Executive Director Support Staff Bill Tapper Mike Benedetto Kelli Huxford Paul Kleinwachter Don Tomann Mary Barger Dick Van Allen Dan Olson Barb Schwientek Tom Feaski Bruce Thielen Ollie Koropchak Rick Wolfsteller Jeff O'Neill Fred Patch John Simola ~ A. OCCUPATION Service, Lender Service, Utility Industrial, Manufacturer ~l Service, Print/Marketing cr~v,Y Industrial, Manufacturer Education Service, Utility Service, Lender Industrial, Manufacturer Industrial, Manufacturer Industrial, Manufacturer Service, Insurance Health Care Chamber Past Chair Mayor ., 7:42 ~. Reports: A. Economic Development Report - Koropchak. 7:45 6. Review the draft copy of the December 7, 2004 Planning Commission Agenda for industrial related items. Discuss and vote on an IDC position or action if necessary. A. Continued Public Hearing -Consideration of an amendment to the Monticello Zoning Ordinance allowing Open and Outdoor Storage. Applicant: City of Monticello. (See attached letter.) Jay Morrell will update IDC members. ~''>3. J Motion appointing an IDC member to the Ad Hoc Subcommittee. --- ~~ g , 7:55 7. Other Business. day, January 4, 2004 IDC members whose term expires December 2004 n T_om Ol ' ,Dan Roberts, and Ly~nn~e•Dahi.~ f e S\ Election of Officers for 2005. Chamber Updates - Feaski B. IDC Annual meeting, Tues 8:00 8. Adjournment. THE TOUR AND RECEPTION FOR WSI INDU COUNCIL, COUNCIL-ELECT, CHAMBER BOA TIMES HAVE BEEN INVITED TO JOIN THE IJ '! T1"' ~~ T WIII oilie ~2-~-~y bC an va~~rf-oY+ Del'• 23-Jan•b ~- w~u ho+- Joe A,bl~ -~o a ~'k2 San • N zoo mcc~f~h~. Nawev~i, t w o ~ IdP I r ke ~b sev~e ~ ho-1'~o~c ~~ on ZiJC. 7ti~k Tom Lindquist, 'ES, INC. BEGINS AT 8:00 A.M. THE OF DIRECTORS, AND MONTICELLO yoti ~~~ • ~~ INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE IN AND FOR THE CITY OF MONTICELLO 2004 ACTION STATEMENT Mission Statement To maintain and increase the industrial tax base and to create jobs in the City of Monticello, Minnesota. Pur ose To operate as an independent lobbying organization structured to influence and assist industrial development in and for the City of Monticello, Minnesota. In the broadest context focus on overall industrial development and developers. Goals and Direction • 1. To provide a continuous stream of available industrial land with infrastructure potential. 2. To review and assess the implementation of-the industrial marketing plan developed in conjunction with the HRA for the City of Monticello. 3. To rate the effectiveness of the use of the industrial marketing plan. 4. To assign time and effort when and where it is deemed necessary to accomplish industrial development. MONTICELLOINDUSTRIAL ~ • DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE ORGANIZATIONAL AND MEMBERSHIP GUIDELINES I. Meeting Time and Place• Regular meetings are held the first Tuesday of each month at 7:00 a.m. in the Monticello City Hall, Academy Room. Special meetings may be called by the Chairperson and Executive Director. II. Objective: As written and adopted by the Annual Industrial Development Committee Action Statement. III. Committee Size• Whilethere is no set or definite size established, it is generally understood that the committee will not exceed 16-18 members. IV. Make-up the Committee• Committee members must either work or reside in the community of greater Monticello. Individuals who are involved in an occupation or profession that provides services to the community of Monticello but is not headquartered within the community may also serve as members of the committee. Standing Committee Members• President or Chair of the Monticello Area Chamber of Commerce. • Mayor of the City of Monticello. Non-voting. City Staff Members• Non-voting. Administrator of the City of Monticello. Assistant Administrator of the City of Monticello. Economic Development Director of the City of Monticello. Chief Building Official of the City of Monticello. V. Officers: The Chairperson, the Vice Chairperson, and the Secretary shall be elected annually at the January meeting. Length of office term shall not exceed three consecutive years. Minutes of each meeting are the responsibility of the Secretary. Committee correspondence are the responsibility of the Economic Development Director. VI. Length of Membershi Term• Members shall serve for three year terms on a three year rotating basis so that approximately one-third of the membership expires each year. Individuals wishing to continue serving on the committee may so indicate prior to the expiration of their term. Any member wishing to relinquish his/her position on the Industrial Development Committee may do so by submitting a letter of resignation. VII. Filling a Vacant Position• A list of potential committee members shall be kept by the Executive Director. The Industrial Development Committee must confirm all new members by a majority • IDC ORGANIZATIONAL/MEMBERSHIP GUIDELINES. PAGE 2 • vote. VIII. Membership Attendance• In order to make a positive contribution to the committee, each member is expected to attend at least 75% of the meetings in any given year. A year is defined as beginning on the 1st of January and ending the 31 th of December. • 2005 CITY OF MONTICELLO OTTER CREEK BUSINESS CAMPUS PREFERRED PACKAGE DEAL PREFERRED PRICE - $1.00 PER SQUARE FOOT UP-FRONT (CASH) NO 2005 IMPROVEMENT ASSESSMENTS, NO TRUNK FEES, AND NO PARK FEES ********* • Jobs per acre: Average hourly wage: Land to building ratio: Developed new market value Minimum size lot * $40 per sq ft. EXAMPLE: 50,000 sq ft building qualifies for 4.59 acres at preferred price (50,000 divided by 10,890.) New market value must be $1,999,404 (4.59 x $435,600.) Create at least 36.7 full-time jobs (8 x 4.59) at wage levels of $16.00 or greater excluding benefits. PREFERRED LAND PRICE: 4.59 acres or 199,940 sq ft @ $1.00 = $199,940 (Cash) PREFERRED MEASURES 8 full-time equivalent jobs/acre At least $16.00 ph excluding benefits 1 acre: 25% building (43,560 sq ft: 10,890 sq ft) $435,600 per acre* 2.5 acres X~:XXX)F iFXXX FORMULA FOR MAXIMUM ACREAGE TO SELL ONE USER (Property not intended for speculation) 1) Building size X 2 = max area for building 2) max area for building X 2 =area of parking. 3) 1 + 2 X 15% _ ? 4) 1 + 2 + 3 =Total maximum acreage to sell one user. EXAMPLE: 1) 50,000 X 2 = 100,000 sq. ft. 2) 100,000 x 2 = 200,000 sq ft. 3) 100,000 + 200,000 = 300,000 sq ft x .15% = 45,000 sq ft. 4) 100,000 sq ft + 200,000 sq ft + 45,000 sq ft. = 345,000 sq ft or 7.92 acres. • U • ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS OTTER CREEK BUSINESS CAMPUS Infrastructure Chelsea Road $ ;89,168 Miscellaneous $ 258,168 School Blvd $1,074,290 TIF Haul Road $ 858,750 TOTAL $2,580,376 Trunk Fees Water (120 @ $1,685) $ 202,200 Sanitary (120 @ $2,142) $ 257,040 TIF Storm Sewer (95 @ $6,497) $ 617,215 TOTAL $1,076,455 Land 120 acres @ $.58 per sq ft $3,031,776 UPFRONT Gradine $ 816,000 UPFRONT TOTAL COSTS $7,504,607 Divide by 95 acres $ 78,996 per acre or $1.81349 per sq ft 3 EXCESS LAND PRICE - $2.15 PER SQUARE FOOT U • "Excess Land" means the difference between maximum acreage less preferred acreage. The "Excess Land" is sold at market value. Developer pays for trunk fees on "Excess Land" at the current rate at time of expansion. No assessment for 2005 improvements and no park fees. "Excess Land" subject to five-year re-verter clause. EXAMPLE: 7.92 acres less 4.59 acres = 3.33 acres or 145,055 sq ft.@ $2.15 per sq ft = $311,868 (cash). ****************************************************************************** * $435,600 /acre market value x 4.59 acres = $1,999,404. Annual taxes $51,0091ess (5%)Adm $2,550 = TI $48,459 X 8 years = $387,672. $193,836 NPV. (Adm = $20,400) City Costs: $27,162 p/a infrastructure $11,331 p/a trunk fees $31,913 p/a land *** $ 8,590 p/a grading TOTAL $78,996 p/a ($ L81 per sq ft) Return:$43,560 p/a land ($1.00 sq. ft cash.) $42,230 p/a TIF TOTAL $85,790 p/a ($1.96 per sq ft) * * * Based on 95 net acres Purchase price $25,265 p/a or $.58 per sq ft for120 acres 2 2005 Market Values i 212-111-000161 PALP CO 16.18 deeded acres Land $ 340,500 Bldg $ 161,900 155-011-000151 PALP CO 2.12 deeded acres Land $ 69,100 18.30 deeded acres Total $571,500 155-143-001010 UMC 10.15 deeded acres 155-120-001010 TCDC 6.14 deeded acres Land $ 331,700 Bldg $3,126,700 (75,000 sq ft) Total $3,458,400 Land $ 200,500 Bldg $1,502,800 (36,000 sq ft) Total $1,703,300 County: new $5-$10 sq ft bin and $30-$35 sq ft facility • U RECOMMENDATIONS Approved December 7, 2004 Clarified December 13, 2004 BY THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE (IDC) for OTTER CREEK BUSINESS CAMPUS 1. RECOMMENDATION TO RE-ZONE THE 120 ACRES OF OTTER CREEK BUSINESS CAMPUS FROMA-O TO I-IA (Light Industrial District) 2. RECOMMENDATION TO ESTABLISH THE FOLLOWING COVENANTS FOR OTTER CREEK BUSINESS CAMPUS. A. Require installation of an irrigation system with the exemption of prairie grass. Landscaping Irrigation Required: On all lots on which a building is proposed to be constructed, the owner shall, prior to occupancy of said building, install, or cause to be installed, in-ground landscaping irrigation between the front building line and the public street. This requirement shall also apply to the side lot areas of corner lots which face a different street. In the case of rear lot areas that front on a public street, the owner shall install, or cause to be install, landscaping irrigation for all landscaped areas within 50 feet of said public street. Irrigation required by this restrictive covenant shall provide adequate irrigation water to all landscaped areas, including lawns, shrubs, tress, flower beds, or other similar features. This requirement also applies to the "boulevard" portion of the public right of way between the owner's property line and the curb line of the public street. B. No outdoor storage allowed On all lots, no owner, tenant, or other occupant shall store materials, equipment, or items outside of any building. The following exceptions are not to be considered storage, and may be located outside in compliance with other applicable regulations: a. Parking of passenger vehicles and light trucks, parked in compliance with the City of Monticello zoning regulations. b. Parking of company vehicles, including trucks, vans, and other similar vehicles, with the exception of semi-truck rigs which are subject to separate regulations. c. Semi-truck tractors and trailer rigs when such tractors and trailer rigs are parking in the side and rear yard. d. Semi-truck trailers located in designated loading docks. e. Trash Handling equipment. • 3. RECOMMENDATION TO ALLOW NO METAL OR STEEL EXTERIOR SIDEWALL B UILDING MATERIALS WITH THE EXCEPTION OF ARCHITECTURAL PANELS NOT-TO-EXCEED IO%. 4. RECOMMENDA TION TO RETAIN THE EXISTING LANDSCAPING ORDINANCE. Reason for zoning recommendation: I-lA Zone is consistent with Monticello Commerce Center zone. (UMC, TCDC, Suburban area.) No re-zoning from I-IA to I-2: Value of YMCA land for housing, consistency with surrounding communities, industrial park with higher quality, sets .tone, next users??? IDC worked long and hard, want to do it right. • How To Site and Develop Your Business In the City of Monticello, Minnesota A Location Site and Development Guide Jnti~niry 2005 Monticello City Hall, 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1, Monticello, MN 55362-8831 • (763) 295-2711 • Fax: (763) 295-4404 Office of Public Works, 909 Golf Course Rd., Monticello, MN 55362 • (763) 295-3170 • Fax: (763) 271-3272 MONTICELLO • How To Site Your Business In the City of Monticello A Location Site and Development Process Guide The Development Service Department of the City of Monticello developed this guide to assist you in the siting and the developing of your business in Monticello. We want you to understand the siting/development process in the City of Monticello so we can meet your needs and provide excellent service. The goal of the City of Monticello is to provide a service that is user-friendly and professional. Site selection and the development process can be challenging, time-consuming, and unique to each business. There are hundreds of details to consider. Therefore, the City of Monticello offers aPre- Design Consultation, an opportunity to gather information and exchange your business needs and the city requirements. • ~~ U CITY OF MONTICELLO How To Site And Develop Your Business In the City of Monticello, Minnesota A Location Site and Development Process Guide Phase I -Site Selection Site Selection Components Identify Client Components Show Appropriate Sites Select Site Information Needed For Business To Do: * Complete and submit the Customer Requirement Worksheet * Visit industrial sites with Economic Development Director * Attend luncheon with Prospect Team (optional) * Select site * Attend Pre-Design Consultation * Provide all preliminary project i level projections * Execute and submit Preliminary * Submit Preliminary Loan Applic For City of Monticello To Do: between business and city development service staff nformation including preliminary building sketch and job and wage Development Agreement and non-refundable deposit anon, if applicable * Show industrial sites and provide infrastructure capacity * Understand all of business needs * Host business luncheon between business and Prospect team (optional) * Visit existing facility, it applicable (Prospect Team) * Develop a land acquisition proposal based project benefit * Schedule Pre-Design Consultation between business and city development service staff * Review project development requirements with business * Provide all relevant development information - Construction - Financing * Execute Preliminary Development Agreement . DEFINE AND INSERT TIME TABLE Phase II -Project Approval Project Approval Components Site/Building Plans Platting Environmental Financial/Land Closing Information Needed For Business To Do: Provide and submit complete, detailed Site and Building Plans - Site Plan (illustrating circulation, parking, and dimensions) - Landscape/Lighting/Sign Plan - Grading/Drainage/Utility Plans - Floor Plans and Building Elevations - Certified Site Survey - Obtain Necessary Regulatory Approvals * Provide and submit Financing Information • -Evidence of Construction Financing - Letter of Commitment from Lender - Job and Wage Level Commitment - Historical and Current Financial Statements, if applicable - Certificate of Liability Insurances Attend meeting, if applicable - Planning Commission, first Tuesday of the month, 6:00 p.m. - City Council, second and fourth Monday of the month, 7:00 p.m. - Housing & Redevelopment Authority (HRA), first Wednesday of the month, 6:00 p.m. - Economic Development Authority (EDA), 4:00 p.m. as called Attend Closing and Execute documents - Contract for Private Development including land acquisition (Purchase Agreement) - Loan Agreement, if applicable and submit payment of legal fees - Collateral for Loan. * Complete and submit all pertinent applications and fees - Building Permit (including WAC/SAC) Fees - Landscape Bond - Loan Application Fee i • FOR CITY OF MONTICELLO TO DO. - Ensure project stays on time-line through approval process - Provide business with one-stop shop, user-friendly service - Authorize establishment of an Economic TIF District - Authorize preparation of the Contract for Private Development including land acquisition (Purchase Agreement) - Authorize preparation of Preliminary/Final Plat (include necessary easements) (Both Preliminary and Final Plat require 5 paper plan sets + 20 reduced) - Authorize preparation of the Loan Agreement, if applicable - Review and approve Site Plans at development service staff level or at planning review, if applicable. - Approval of Building Plans by Chief Building Official. - Arrange and achieve development and financing approvals from all required city departments and commissions/council - Prepare Final Plat Mylars (3 mylars, 1 retained by City) - Record Final Plat at County - Schedule closing and execution of Contract for Private Development including land acquisition and Loan Agreement, if applicable. - Record necessary closing documents . DEFINE AND INSERT TIME TABLE Phase III -Construction Construction Components Permitting Inspection Permitting needs to be completed before construction begins. All development approvals and financing closing/recording must be completed prior to permitting. FOR B USINESS TO DO: - Ensure that the site and building meets City Code requirements - Pick-up necessary Building Permits. - Schedule Groundbreaking Celebration (optional.) - Call and schedule inspections and final inspection. - Comply with documentation and reporting requirements outlined in the Contract for Private Development and Loan Agreement, if applicable. FOR CITY OF MONTICELLO TO DO: • -Verify all fees are collected and verify financing and closing documentation is executed and recorded. - Host Groundbreaking Celebration Reception (optional) - Building/grading permit issued by Chief Building Official. - Complete inspections on a timely basis - If site does not comply, write to business requesting correction and re-inspection - Issue Certificate of Occupancy - Issue Certificate of Completion. If you have any questions about Phases I, II, or III described in this guide or have any questions about the site selection and development process, please contact the City of Monticello Economic Development Director. City of Monticello Office of Economic Development Director Direct: 763-271-3208 City of Monticello Main: 763-295-2711 Website: www. monticello. mn. us DEFINE AND INSERT TIME TABLE U DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Pnone: ~763> 271-32os Economic Development Services Fax: (763) 29~-4404 E-mail: Ollie.koropchak@ci.monticello.us Return to City of Monticello, Office of Economic Development SOS Walnut Street, Suite 1, Monticello, MN 55362 MONTICELLO CUSTOMER REQUIREMENT WORKSHEET Name of Company: Address: Phone: Fax Email Contact person: Title: • Nature of the business: Number of existing jobs and wage levels to be retained: Complete attached. Type of jobs: Number of workers per shift: Number of new jobs and wage levels to be created: Complete attached. Expansion: Relocation: If relocation, from where: Proposed size of new facility: Office sq. ft.: Manufacturing sq. ft.: Warehousing sq. ft.: Proposed exterior material: Acreage requested: Zoning: I1 A -Light Industrial/Business Campus Monticello City Hall, 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1, Monticello, MN 55362-8831 • (763) 295-2711 • Fax: (763) 295-4404 Office of Public Works, 909 Golf Course Rd., Monticello, MN 55362 • (763) 295-3170 • Fax: (763) 271-3272 1!/IATTT/~TT T n Customer Requirement Worksheet -Page 2 Timetable for occupancy: Wet industry: Potential Environmental Impact: _ Anticipated consumption of water? Special needs within Facility: Overhead Doors Clean Area Utilities Other Garage Doors Paint Area Public Improvements Outdoor/open storage requirements? Are you looking at other communities? How can we assist you? How did you select Monticello as a possible site location? What are you looking for from the community? Age of company? History of Company? How do you market your product? What is your market area? Expected company growth in five years? Expected company growth in ten years? Name & address of architect and general contractor? Can we visit your existing site?_ Level of Confidentiality Required? Misc/Customer requiremenL2004 Dry industry: Set Date: DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Phone: (763) z7~-3zoa Economic Development Director Fax: (763) 29~-4404 Email: ollie.koronchal:r~i~ci monticelk~ mn us CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA .10B AND WAGE LEVEL -EXISTING .10BS Please indicate number of current employees at each level and indicate the corresponding benefit level. Number of Jobs Hourly Wage Hourly Value Level of Voluntary Benefits (S) Full-time Part-time (Excl. benefits) Less than $7.00 $7.00 to $7.99 $8.00 to $9.99 $10.00 to $1 1.99 $12.00 to $13.99 $]4.OOto$15.99 $ l 6.00 to $17.99 $18.00 to $19.99 $20.00 to $21.99 $22.00 and higher Company Name JO[3S WAGFEXISTI NG.FORM i Monticello City Hall, 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1, Monticello, MN 55362-8837 • (763) 295-2711 • Fax: (763) 295-4404 Office of Public Works, 909 Golf Coarse Rd., Monticello, MN 55362 • (763) 295-3170 • Fax: (763) 271-3272 MONTICELLO